Oakland City Council
July 21, 2026

Ci
ty of Oakland, California
Jestin Johnson, City Administrator

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
for
City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments
Ci
ty Project Number: 1008000
Federal Project No.: DE-SE0000418
Oakland Public Works (OPW) Bureau of Design and Construction Project and Grant Management Division
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 4314, Oakland, CA 94612 Project Manager: Samah Itani
[email protected]
Phone No.: (510) 238-7116
December 2025
Attachment A
RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SEC
TION
I Project Information
A. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NOTICE ....................................................................... 1 B. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 2 C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 2 D. SCOPE OF SERVICES .............................................................................................. 2 II S
ubmittal Requirements .............................................................................................. 5 III Sel
ection Process
A. PROPOSAL EVALUATION ...................................................................................... 8 B. INTERVIEW OF SHORT-LISTED FIRMS ................................................................... 8 C. CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS .................................................................................. 9 D. CONTRACT AWARD ............................................................................................. 10 E. PROJECT TIMELINE .............................................................................................. 11 IV N
otice to Proposers DBE Information ....................................................................... 13 V Man
datory Policies and Programs .............................................................................. 17 VI A
ppendices
APPENDIX A: City Schedules and Federal Exhibits:

Part 1 - Due with Proposal
Part 2 - Due During Contract Execution Phase
Part 3 – Documents for Project Close-Out Phase
APPENDIX B: Sample Professional Agreement
APPENDIX C: Schedule Q – Professional Services Insurance Requirements APPENDIX D: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Eligible Activities and Program
APPENDIX E: FY25-27 Adopted CIP Budget
APPENDIX F: Condensed City of Oakland CIP List of Funded and Unfunded Projects FY25-27
APPENDIX G: EECBG Grant Department of Energy Award Docs RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments SECTION I. Project Information
A. REQ

UEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NOTICE
CI

TY OF OAKLAND, CA

OAKLAND PUBLIC WORKS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Pr
oject No. 1008000
Project Name: City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments Description:

The City of Oakland’s Project and Grant Management Division (PGMD) is seeking a qualified consultant team to conduct energy assessments and audits for City-owned facilities and building sites. This work will be funded through the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) program. Due to budget constraints, it is anticipated that the selected consultant will be able to complete no more than 25–30 energy assessments for City-owned facilities. Facilities for assessment will be drawn from the approved list of funded and unfunded City of Oakland Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects for FY25–27. The City intends to enter into a one (1) year contract in an amount not-to-exceed $365,000.

RFP Documents and AB 2036 Compliance: RFP documents are only available digitally and provided free of charge through the website listed below.

1. iSupplier: https://cooisupplierprd.oaklandca.gov/OA_HTML/AppsLocalLogin.jsp OR

2. RFP and Contracts Opportunities: https://apps.oaklandca.gov/ContractOpportunities/ Pr
e-Proposal Meeting: January 12, at 10:00 AM. The voluntary pre-proposal meeting will be held via Microsoft Teams only.
https
://teams.microsoft.com
Meeting ID: 244 930 018 303 09
Passcode: 52ke7ZP3
Questions Due: January 22, by 2:00 PM email to [email protected], cc the Project Manager. When sending emails, please use the following naming convention: “Project 1008000 - City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments”. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to ensure that the email is received by Capital Contract Division.

Addendum: Any addendum that materially changes the RFP invitation shall be issued no less than 72 hours before the proposal opening, unless the proposal opening is extended by said addendum.

Proposals Due: February 5, by 2:00 PM. Proposals may either be uploaded into the City’s iSupplier online portal or may be mailed, or hand delivered to the City Clerk’s Office at 1

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Room 101, Oakland, CA 94612 prior to the proposal due date and time. Late submissions will not be accepted and will be returned unopened.

Federal DBE Goal: None
Contract Term and Amount: Estimated Term: One (1) year. Estimated Amount: $ 365,000 Contact Information:

OPW Project Manager: Samah Itani, [email protected], (510) 238-7116 Capital Contracts: [email protected]
Department of Workplace and Employment Standards: [email protected] Asha Reed, City Clerk and Clerk of the City Council
Newspaper publication date: December 19, 2025
B. INTRODUCTION
The
City of Oakland’s Project and Grant Management Division (PGMD) is seeking a qualified consultant team to conduct energy assessments and audits for City-owned facilities and building sites. This work will be funded through the U.S. Department of Energy’ s Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) program. Due to budget constraints, it is anticipated that the selected consultant will be able to complete no more than 25 –30 energy assessments for City- owned facilities. Facilities for assessment will be drawn from the approved list of funded and unfunded City of Oakland Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects for FY25 –27. The City intends to enter into a one (1) year contract in an amount not-to-exceed $365,000.

C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The
City of Oakland’s Project and Grant Management Division (PGMD) is seeking a qualified consultant team to conduct energy assessments and audits for City-owned facilities and building sites. This work will be funded through the U.S. Department of Energy’ s Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) program. Due to budget constraints, it is anticipated that the selected consultant will be able to complete no more than 25 –30 energy assessments for City- owned facilities. Facilities for assessment will be drawn from the approved list of funded and unfunded City of Oakland Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects for FY25 –27. The City intends to enter into a one (1) year contract in an amount not-to-exceed $365,000 to provide the services described below.

D. SCOPE OF SERVICES

1. En
ergy Assessments and Audits
a. Conduct energy assessments for up to 25–30 City-owned facilities, prioritizing facilities listed in the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects for RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

F
Y25–27, whether funded or unfunded.
b. Perform on-site audits and review facility energy data, including building systems, HVAC, lighting, controls, and other relevant energy-using equipment. c. Identify energy efficiency, resilience, and electrification opportunities, including low-cost measures, retrofits, and potential renewable energy integration. d. Provide recommendations to optimize energy performance and reduce overall facility energy consumption.

2. T
echnical Analysis and Roadmapping
a. Analyze energy data and calculate key energy metrics for each facility, including baseline energy consumption, peak load, and other relevant performance indicators.
b. Develop customized facility roadmaps outlining phased implementation paths, planning-level cost estimates for recommended measures at each building or facility, projected energy savings, benefits, and timelines for recommended upgrades and resilience measures.
c. Provide guidance on prioritization of improvements based on implementation cost estimates, feasibility, and alignment with City energy goals.

3. C
ollaboration and Support
a. Work closely with City staff throughout the audit process, including planning, data collection, draft reviews, and final report delivery. b. Identify opportunities to coordinate with other City programs, projects, and funding sources to maximize the impact of proposed energy improvements.

4. Ot
her Tasks
a. Conduct research and benchmarking as needed to inform recommendations. b. Prepare supporting materials such as diagrams, tables, charts, or visualizations that enhance understanding of energy efficiency opportunities. c. Other tasks as assigned by City.

E. DELIVERABLES

1. Pr
oject Coordination
a. Conduct a project kickoff meeting and provide a detailed work schedule with key milestones and deliverables.
b. Participate in bi-weekly progress meetings with City staff and submit meeting minutes documenting decisions and next steps.

2. M
unicipal Facility Energy Assessment Plan
a. Energy Assessment Reports: A report for each facility including audit findings, energy output calculations, system assessments, and tailored recommendations for energy efficiency, electrification, and resilience upgrades. b. Facility Energy Assessment Plan: A consolidated plan summarizing findings for all RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

as
sessed facilities, including low-cost and long-term improvement strategies. c. Customized Energy Roadmaps: Individual facility roadmaps outlining phased implementation plans, estimated costs, projected savings, benefits, and timelines for recommended upgrades and resilience measures. d. Implementation Support Materials: Documentation, guidance, and recommendations to assist City staff with potential implementation of energy efficiency and resilience measures.
e. Supporting Analysis and Visuals: Data tables, charts, and diagrams that summarize energy use, improvement opportunities, and roadmap strategies, along with supporting visuals such as floor plans, site layouts, and photographs of relevant building systems or energy-related equipment. f. Provide a draft Plan for City staff review and feedback prior to submission of the final report.

3. O
ther deliverables associated with tasks as assigned by City.

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

SECTION II. Submittal Requirements

Proposals shall be submitted electronically via iSupplier the City’s online procurement system or by mail, or hand-delivered to the City Clerk at 1 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Room 101, Oakland, CA 94612 before the proposal deadline specified in this RFP, subject to Addenda issued.

Proposals not received by the deadline may not be considered for evaluation and award.

The proposal should be organized in the order in which the required elements are presented below. Elements to be included in the proposal are described below.

1. Transmittal or Cover Letter
a. To the attention of: Samah Itani, Project Manager, Project and Grant Management Division, Oakland Public Works, 250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, Suite 4314, Oakland, CA 94612.
b. Signed by an office of the prime consultant. In case of joint venture or other joint-prime relationship, an officer of each venture partner shall sign.

2. Acknowledgement of Addenda
a. If any addenda are issued, you must acknowledge your receipt of them either by including a statement in your transmittal letter or by returning signed addenda with the proposal.

3. Firm Profile (Suggested Limit - 2 pages)
a. The prime consultant and sub-consultants (if applicable) must be able to demonstrate expertise, experience, and the ability to provide the services and complete the tasks described in the Section I. Include a brief description of the prime consultant firm (firm) and sub-consultant team (if applicable), including number of employees and years in business, as well as the firm’s overall approach and strategy to working directly with communities. b. Provide an organizational chart of the team, including project manager(s) and lead technical staff.
c. Provide resume or summary qualifications of the lead technical staff who may be assigned to this project. Staff qualifications should include a brief description of relevant experience in the project areas and services listed in this RFP, proposed role, length of work experience, and any areas of expertise. Resumes may be included as an appendix.

4. Relevant Experience – Prime Consultant and Sub-Consultants (Suggested Limit – 4 pages)
a. Briefly describe three relevant projects coordinated by the project team that will demonstrate the competence of the team to perform the work specified in this RFP. The consultant qualification statements shall emphasize RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

experience in highlighting experience specific to energy audits and similar facility assessment projects.
b. Documentation of each project must include the following:
i.Agency or company for which the work was performed;
ii.General description of the scope of work;
iii.Examples of data collected from assessments ad overview of the final plans/and or reports.
iv.Name of agency or company representative responsible for project review and whom to contact as a reference.

5. Project Approach and Organization (Suggested Limit – 2 pages) a. Describe the method and tools the project team would employ to effectively and efficiently complete the scoped tasks and accomplish the deliverables listed in Section I.
b. Include a timeline for the proposed services organized to address the phases involved in accomplishing the scoped tasks related to facility assessments, energy data analysis, roadmap and plan development, coordination with City staff, and preparation of supporting materials. Pro vide estimated hours and costs associated with each of the scoped tasks and summarized in a cost proposal

6. References (Suggested Limit - 1 page)
a. Prime Consultant and Sub-Consultants: Three business related references, giving name, company, address, telephone number and business relationship to firm(s).

7. Cost Proposal and Hourly Billing Rates (Suggested Limit - 3 pages) a. The prime consultant shall provide a cost proposal to accomplish each deliverable and phased task. The prime consultant may propose time and materials and/or fixed-cost estimates.
i.If the cost proposal is based on hourly rates, the prime consultant and sub-consultants shall provide a complete list of all staff hourly rates of the positions that would be invoiced, i.e., Principal, Project Manager, Administrative Support, etc. Hourly rates shall be itemized and all-inclusive, i.e., base salary, fringe benefits, overhead, indirect cost surcharges, profit, etc.
b. The prime consultant shall provide a monthly invoice with supporting documentation that shows the hours billed to specific tasks executed and services provided if the task is based on time and materials or reference to the deliverable completed if the task is based on a fixed price as determined in the scope of work.
c. Mark-up on all reimbursable expenses, i.e., subconsultant fee, printing, production costs, photography, equipment rental, mailing/postage, use of vehicle, software procurement, materials acquisition, etc., shall be individually negotiated and shall be subject to the City’s approval, but may not in any case exceed 10%.

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

d. The contract amount will be a maximum not -to-exceed amount. During the one (1) year contract term, there is no provision for hourly billing rate increases or adjustments. If an amendment to extend the contract expiration becomes necessary, hourly billing rate increases/adjustments may be permitted in accordance with the annual increase stipulated each July 1 by the City’s Living Wage Ordinance (Chapter 2.28 of the Oakland Municipal Code).

4. City Schedules and Federal Exhibits (see APPENDIX A, PART 1) RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

SECTION III. Selection Process

A. PROPOSAL EVALUATION
A panel of minimum three reviewers will review and evaluate the Proposals. Members of the panel may include professionals from outside agencies and from the City of Oakland. Proposals will be evaluated and scored using the criteria described below for a possible total of 100 points.

Evaluation Criteria Points
Approach and Strategy: Clarity and effectiveness of the firm’s overall approach, methodology, and project management strategy, and budget approach to complete the work within the requested timeframe and funding constraints.

25 Experience and Past Performance: Demonstrated success conducting municipal or public facility energy assessments within budget and grant program requirements, with strong references for quality, scope, and schedule adherence.

20 Technical Expertise and Capacity: Depth of staff, resources, and technical capabilities in energy modeling, analysis, and development of facility energy roadmaps; proven ability to deliver high-quality work under tight timelines.

20 Sustainability and Resilience: Experience developing implementable strategies supporting electrification, HVAC optimization, renewable energy integration, and other municipal energy priorities.

20 Collaboration and Communication: Ability to work effectively with City staff, facility managers, and other stakeholders, translating technical findings into clear, actionable recommendations.

15 Total 100

Based on an evaluation of the proposals, the City will develop a “short list” of firms to be considered for further evaluation, possibly including oral interviews. References, including past performance on City projects completed by the firms, if applicable, may be considered in the evaluation process.

B.

INTERVIEW OF SHORT-LISTED FIRMS
If needed, oral interviews may be conducted to help with the selection of the final firm. Up to three teams may be invited to final interviews, resulting in the selection of one firm. The City will negotiate a mutually agreeable contract for the services described in this RFP with the successful proposer.

If interviews are needed, the teams selected for interviews will be notified in writing. It is presently anticipated that the interviews will be conducted within three weeks of notification.

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

The interviews will last approximately 30 minutes, with 15 minutes allocated for the consultant's presentation and the remaining time for a question and answer period. Interviews will be held at a City office (exact location to be determined). The proposer will be required to provide all equipment necessary to make their presentation. The proposal scores will have no bearing on the interview scores.

The City reserves the right to select consultants based solely on the proposals, and not conduct oral interviews.

C.

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS

1. The completion of the interview process will result in the firms being numerically ranked. The City will initiate contract negotiations in order of the ranking. Should the City and a firm not be able to reach an agreement as to contract terms within a reasonable time frame, the City may terminate negotiation at the City’s sole discretion.

2. All RFP responses become the property of the City.

3. The City reserves the right to negotiate the final scope of services and will not be bound by the scope of services presented in the RFP nor by the scope of services in the consultant’s proposal.

4. The RFP does not commit the City to award an agreement or to pay any cost incurred in the preparation of the proposal.

5. The City reserves the unqualified right without liability or commitment to any party, firm, or organization, whether or not minimum proposals are met:
a. to evaluate each proposal and to accept or reject any or all proposals received; b. to modify, suspend, or terminate at its sole discretion any and all aspects of the RFP and/or RFP process, to obtain further information from any and all consultant teams, and to waive any defects as to form or content of the RFP or any responses by any consultant teams obligation;
c. to reject any or all proposals and to suggest that individual members of teams collaborate to form new consultant teams; and
d. to require a service provider to participate in negotiations and submit technical information or other revisions to the service provider’s qualifications as may result from negotiations.

6. In finalizing the scope of services, the City may request that the consultant add, delete, or replace sub-consultants with those from other teams that submitted proposals. Such changes will be bound to the project DBE requirements.

7. The contract amount (including reimbursable expenses) will be a maximum not-to- exceed amount on the tasks described in Chapter 1 and the cost proposal or hourly rates submitted under Chapter 2, or lesser rates mandated by the City. Reimbursable expenses are subject to prior approval of the City. The amount for such expenses will be RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

included in the maximum not-to-exceed amount. Note: Firms will be required to maintain their billing rates for this period. Should the term of the Agreement need to be extended, rate increases will be allowed at that time.

D. CONTRACT AWARD

1. Upon successful completion of the negotiations, City staff will seek City Council authorization to award a professional services agreement to the selected consulting firm. Upon authorization to award the contract by the City Council and upon execution of the contract, the City shall issue an Authorization to Proceed to the selected consulting firms.

2. The selected consulting firm shall be required to maintain auditable records, documents, and papers for inspection by authorized local, state and federal representatives. Therefore, the consulting team may be required to undergo an evaluation to demonstrate that the firm uses recognized accounting and financial procedures.

3. Sample Professional Services Agreement
Consultants are advised to review the sample Professional Services Agreement (see Appendices). Consultants will be required to execute this agreement and the City is not inclined to make any modifications to its terms and conditions. Submittal of a proposal shall demonstrate the consultant’s understanding and acceptance of the terms of the agreement.

4. Insurance Requirements
The awarded consultant will be required to provide proof of insurance in accordance with Schedule Q prior to execution of a contract. (see Appendices)

5. Business Tax Certificate
The consultant awarded this contract shall obtain or provide proof of having a current City of Oakland Business Tax Certificate prior to contract execution and shall maintain a current tax certificate for the duration of the contract.

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

E. PROJECT TIMELINE
The following is an approximate and estimated linear timeframe and it is for information only.

The Consultant shall not be entitled for additional compensation if this timeline is not met or if the actual project’s schedule differs from this timeline.

ACTIVITY ESTIMATED TIMEFRAME
RFP Issued December 19, 2025
Pre-Proposal Meeting January 12, 2026
Question Due January 22, 2026
Proposals Due February 5, 2026
RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

SECTION IV. Notice to Proposers DBE Information
(AKA FEDERAL EXHIBIT 10-I)

DBE GOALS NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS CONTRACT

1. Terms As Used In This Document
• “consultant”, “prime consultant” and “proposer” are defined as a professional services consultant.
• “Disadvantaged Business Enterprise” or “DBE” means a for-profit small business concern owned and controlled by a socially and economically disadvantaged person(s) as defined in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 26.5. • “agreement” also means “contract.”
• “Agency” also means the local entity entering into this contract with the contractor or consultant.
• “Small Business” or “SB” is as defined in 49 CFR 26.65.

2. Protest Procedures
In accordance with 49 CFR 18.36(b)(12), the City shall have protest procedures to handle and resolve disputes relating to their procurements and shall in all instances disclose information regarding the protest to the awarding agency (i.e. Caltrans Local Assistance). A protestor must exhaust all administrative remedies with the City before pursuing a protest with the Federal agency. Reviews of protests by the Federal agency will be limited to: (i) Violations of Federal law or regulations and the standards of this section (violations of State or local law will be under the jurisdictio n of State or local authorities) and (ii) Violatio ns of the City ’s protest procedures for failure to review a complaint or protest. Protests received by the Federal agency other than those specified above will be referred to the City.

Any proposer desiring to protest any RFP must file a written protest with the Office of the City Clerk within five (5) working days of the RFP submittal deadline. For example, for RFPs due between 2:00 -3:00 p.m. on Thursdays, the Protest Deadline is 3:00 p.m. the following Thursday. The written protest must comply with the following requirements:

A. Only a prime consultant who has actually submitted a proposal for the subject project is eligible to submit a protest. Subconsultants are not eligible to submit protests. A proposer may not rely on the protest submitted by another proposer, but must timely pursue its own protest.

B. The protest must contain a complete statement of the basis for the protest and all supporting documentation. Material submitted after the Protest Deadline will not be considered. The protest must refer to the specific portion(s) of the Contract Documents upon which the protest is based. The protest must contain the project number and project name. The protest must contain the name, address and telephone number of the person representing the protesting proposer.

C. The procedures and time limits set forth in this section are mandatory and are the proposer’s sole and exclusive remedy in the event of protest. The proposer ’s failure to comply with these procedures shall constitute a waiver of any right to further pursue a protest, including filing a Government Code Claim or initiation of legal RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

proceedings.

D. In all cases, the first level of review of any protest shall be conducted by OPW Contract Services department which shall, within 48 hours of receiving a protest from the City Clerk’s office, will acknowledge receipt of protest in writing to the protesting proposer. As appropriate, the City Clerk, the Project Manager, the Contract Compliance Officer, and/or the City Attorney will be consulted to resolve the protest.

E. The City shall make their best effort to resolve the protest within twenty-five (25) working days after the protest is filed. A written determination of the protest will be issued to the protesting proposer by the OPW Contract Services department on behalf of the City.

F. The City may not award the contract pending the City’s determination of the protest unless the contract award is justified for urgent and compelling reasons or is determined to be in the best interest of the City. Such justification or determination shall be approved by the Director of the Public Works Department, or the designee.

3. Authority and Responsibility
A. DBEs and other small businesses are strongly encouraged to participate in the performance of Contracts financed in whole or in part with federal funds (See 49 CFR 26, “Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs”). The Consultant must ensure that DBEs and other small businesses have the opportunity to participate in the performance of the work that is the subject of this solicitation and should take all necessary and reasonable steps for this assurance. The proposer must not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of subcontracts.

B. Proposers are encouraged to use services offered by financial institutions owned and controlled by DBEs.

4. Submission of DBE Information (not required for this contract) A. Exhibit 10- O1 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment : The proposer must submit Exhibit 10-O1 with their proposal. In order for a proposer to be considered responsible and responsive, the proposer must make good faith efforts to meet the go al established for the contract. All DBE participation will be counted towards the contract goal; therefore, all DBE participation shall be collected and reported.

B. Exhibit 10- O2 Consultant Contract DBE Information: This Exhibit is due from the successful proposer and shall be submitted after negotiations are completed. Even if no DBE participation will be reported, the successful proposer must execute and return this Exhibit.

C. Exhibit 15-H DBE Information – Good Faith Efforts: It is highly recommended that proposers submit Exhibit 15 -H even if they believe they have met the DBE goal. If a proposer fails to meet the DBE goal and does not submit Exhibit 15 -H, their proposal will be deemed non- responsive. If a proposer fails to meet the DBE goal and doe s submit Exhibit 15 -H with compelling documentation of good faith efforts, their proposal c ould be deemed responsive. If a proposer meets the DBE goal and does not submit Exhibit 15-H, their proposal will be deemed responsive. Proposers may submit RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

Exhibit 15-H with their proposal or NO LATER THAN 4:00 PM on the 4th working day after proposal d ue date. Submit by mail, messenger or email to Capital Contracts Division, 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 4314, Oakland, CA 94612; to the attention of Dasco Munoz. See Request for Proposals fo r contact information.

5. DBE Participation General Information (not required for this contract) It is the proposer’s responsibility to be fully informed regarding the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 26, and the Department’s DBE program developed pursuant to the regulations. Particular attention is directed to the following:

A. A DBE must be a small business firm defined pursuant to 13 CFR 121 and be certified through the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP).

B. A certified DBE may participate as a prime consultant, subconsultant, joint venture partner, as a vendor of material or supplies, or as a trucking company.

C. A DBE proposer not proposing as a joint venture with a non- DBE, will be required to document one or a combination of the following:

1. The proposer is a DBE and will meet the goal by performing work with its own forces.

2. The proposer will meet the goal through work performed by DBE subconsultants, suppliers or trucking companies.

3. The proposer, prior to proposing, made adequate good faith efforts to meet the goal. Refer to Exhibit 15-H for further information.

D. A DBE joint venture partner must be responsible for specific contract items of work or clearly defined portions thereof. Responsibility means actually performing, managing, and supervising the work with its own forces. The DBE joint venture partner must share in the capital contribution, control, management, risks and profits of the joint venture commensurate with its ownership interest.

E. A DBE must perform a commercially useful function pursuant to 49 CFR 26.55, that is, a DBE firm must be responsible for the execution of a distinct element of the work and must carry out its responsibility by actually performing, managing and supervising the work.

F. The proposer shall list only one subconsultant for each portion of work as defined in their proposal and all DBE subconsultants should be listed in the bid/cost proposal list of subconsultants.

G. A prime consultant who is a certified DBE is eligible to claim all of the work in the Contract toward the DBE participation except that portion of the work to be performed by non-DBE subconsultants.

6. Resources
A. The CUCP database includes the certified DBEs from all certifying agencies participating in the CUCP. If you believe a firm is certified that cannot be located on the database, please contact the Caltrans Office of Certification toll free number 1 - 866-810-6346 for assistance.

B. Access the CUCP database from the Department of Transportation, Office of Business and Economic Opportunity Web site at: https://ucp.dot.ca.gov/licenseForm.htm i. Click on the link titled Disadvantaged Business Enterprise;

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

ii. Click on Search for a DBE Firm link;

iii. Click on Access to the DBE Query Form located on the first line in the center of the page.

Searches can be performed by one or more criteria. Follow instructions on the screen.

7. Materials or Supplies Purchased From DBEs Count Towards The DBE Goal Under the Following Conditions (not required for this contract)
A. If the materials or supplies are obtained from a DBE manufacturer, count 100 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies. A DBE manufacturer is a firm that operates or maintains a factory, or establishment that produces on the premises the materials, supplies, articles, or equipment required under the Contract and of the general character described by the specifications.

B. If the materials or supplies purchased from a DBE regular dealer, count 60 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies. A DBE regular dealer is a firm that owns, operates or maintains a store, warehouse, or other establishment in which the materials, supplies, articles or equipment of the general character described by the specifications and required under the Contract are bought, kept in stock, and regularly sold or leased to the public in the usual course of business. To be a DBE regular dealer, the firm must be an established, regular business that engages, as its principal business and under its own name, in the purchase and sale or lease of the products in question. A person may be a DBE regular dealer in such bulk items as petroleum products, steel, cement, gravel, stone or asphalt without owning, operating or maintaining a place of business provided in this section.

C. If the person both owns and operates distribution equipment for the products, any supplementing of regular dealers’ own distribution equipment shall be, by a long-term lease agreement and not an ad hoc or Agreement-by-Agreement basis. Packagers, brokers, manufacturers’ representatives, or other persons who arrange or expedite transactions are not DBE regular dealers within the meaning of this section.

D. Materials or supplies purchased from a DBE, which is neither a manufacturer nor a regular dealer, will be limited to the entire amount of fees or commissions charged for assistance in the procurement of the materials and supplies, or fees or transportation charges for the delivery of materials or supplies required on the job site, provided the fees are reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees charged for similar services.

8. Financial Management and Accounting System Requirements Contracts will not be awarded to a consultant without an adequate financial management and accounting system as required by 48 CFR Part 16.301 -3, 49 CFR Part 18 and 48 CFR Part

31. Prime consultants with a proposed contract totaling $150,000 or more, and any subconsultants listed on the contract, must certify the accuracy of their contract costs and adequacy of their financial management systems (see Appendices for Exhibit 10-K “Consultant Certification of Contract Costs and Financial Management System”).

Components include certification that:

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

• All costs included in the proposed contract to establish final indirect cost rate (ICR) are allowable in accordance with the cost principle of the FAR, 48 CFR, Part 31. • The proposed contract does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of the FAR, 48 CFR, Part 31.
• All known material transactions or events that have occurred affecting the firm’s ownership, organization, and ICRs have been disclosed.
• The consultant’s financial management system meets the standards for financial reporting, accounting records, internal and budget controls set forth in the FAR 49 CFR, Part 18.20.
• The consultant has provided the approximate dollar amount of all A&E contracts awarded by Caltrans or a California local agency to the consultant within the last three calendar years, and for all state DOTs and local agency contracts, and the number of states in which the firm does business.
• All direct costs included in the proposed contract are reasonable, allowable, and allocable in accordance with FAR 48 CFR, Part 31, in compliance with applicable accounting principles, and in compliance with the terms of the proposed contract.

Consultants must also ensure their ICRs are prepared in the acceptable ICR scheduled format, see AASHTO Uniform Audit & Accounting Guide, Chapter 5 tables.

S
ubconsultants are required to follow all the state, federal and contract requirements outlined above. In addition, all subconsultants are required to:
• Certify their contract costs and financial management system (Exhibit 10-K “Consultant Certification of Contract Costs and Financial Management System”) when the total contract between the prime consultant and the local agency is $150K or more. (23 U.S.C. 112(b)(2)(B)).
• Use the accrual basis of accounting when developing their ICRs. • Have an adequate job costing system.

9. Prompt Payment of Funds Withheld to Subcontractors
Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all of the provisions of this section.

No retainage will be held by the City from progress payments due the prime consultant. Any retainage held by the prime consultant or subconsultants from progress payments due subconsultants shall be promptly paid in full to subconsultants within 30 days after the subconsultant’s work is satisfactorily completed. Federal law (49 CFR26.29) requires that any delay or postponement of payment over the 30 days may take place only for good cause and with the City’s prior written approval. Any violation of this provision shall subject the violating prime consultant or subconsultant to the penalties, sanctions and other remedies specified in Section 7108.5 of the Business and Professions Code. These requirements shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies, otherwise available to the prime consultant or subconsultant in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by the prime consultant, deficient subconsultant performance, or noncompliance by a subconsultant. This provision applies to both DBE and non- DBE prime consultants and subconsultants.

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

SECTION V. Mandatory Policies and Programs

<<< City Schedules E (Federal) and O shall be submitted with the proposal. (APPENDIX A, PART 1) >>>

All other City Schedules referenced below are not required with the proposal. These schedules will only be required of the contractor receiving the award and will be provided during the contract execution phase (APPENDIX A, PART 2). Further description of these Schedules, policies, programs, and ordinances referenced in this section can be found at:

https://www.oaklandca.gov/documents/contracts-and-compliance-forms-and-schedules

Please carefully review all the terms and conditions described below. The City shall award contracts only to firms that can achieve full comp liance.

1. Definitions for this section:
• “contractor”, “consultant”, “firm”, “prime consultant” and “proposer” are defined as a professional services consultant.

2. Pre-Proposal/Pre-Submittal Meeting Information
Section I.A. Request for Proposals Notice and legal advertisement will indicate whether a pre-proposal/pre-submittal meeting is scheduled, and if it is voluntary or mandatory. If mandatory, Prime Proposers who fail to attend the pre- proposal/pre-submittal meeting are disqualified from submitting a proposal/statement of qualifications . Topics discussed at the meeting may include, but are not limited to, general or technical project information, compliance requirements for programs such as the City’s Local/Small Local Business Enterprise Program, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise provisions, or supplemental HUD funding provisions, the Local Employment Program, the Oakland Apprenticeship Workforce Development Partnership System, Prompt Payment Ordinance , Equal Benefits Ordinance, Border Wall Prohibition, minimum wage ordinance, living wage ordinance , and prevailing wages.

3. Proposal Documents and Addenda
Proposal Documents and Addenda are available digitally only and provided free of charge through two websites listed below. Hard copies are NOT available for purchase from the City.

Courtesy notifications for Public Works Department contracting opportunities are only emailed to vendors registered in iSupplier and the City’s Contract Opportunities site.

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

a. iSupplier System (City’s official site):
http://www2.oaklandnet.com/Government/o/CP/s/ContractingPurchasingOpportunities/index.htm Registration in iSupplier, the City’s payment and procurement system, is required in order to receive a contract, payments and notifications of contracting opportunities.

New registrants can email [email protected]
for registration instructions.

Allow three working days for approval to access bid documents through iSupplier.

Without proper registration, your firm may not be receiving notifications from iSupplier regarding contracting opportunities. We recommend updating your firm’s primary email contact regularly and confirming the “Products and Services” section of your profile is correctly filled out. For further information, refer to the following link for detailed iSupplier registration instructions.
http://www2.oaklandnet.com/oakca1/groups/contracting/documents/webcontent/oak039337.pdf The iSupplier system assigns a unique “Request for Quotation” number solely used for reference or tracking within the iSupplier system. This number need not be referenced in your submittal.

b. Bids and Contracts Opportunities:
https://apps.oaklandca.gov/ContractOpportunities/

4. Public Records Act or Sunshine Ordinance
Once a final award is made, all RFP responses except financial and proprietary information become a matter of public record and shall be regarded by the City as public records. Firms may label individual pages as "confidential" or "proprietary" informatio n to indicate their desire to withhold financial or proprietary information. The City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records or portions thereof if the disclosure is made pursuant to a request under the Public Records Act or the City of Oakland Sunshine Ordinance. Disclosure of any such records is at the City's discretion, based on the potential impact of the public's interest.

5. Rejection of Proposal Elements
A proposal RISKS BEING REJECTED for any of the following reasons:
 Proposal received after designated time and date.
 Proposal received at other than the designated location.  Proposal not meeting the Federal DBE goal as indicated in Section I.  Proposal not containing the required elements or exhibits, or not organized in the required format.
 Proposal containing excess or extraneous material not called for in the RFP.  Proposal considered not fully responsive to this RFP.

6. Non-Discrimination/Equal Employment Practices
Consultant shall not discriminate or permit discrimination against any person or group of persons in any manner prohibited by federal, state or local laws. During the performance of this contract, Consultant agrees as follows:

a. The consultant and its sub-consultants shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, marital status, religion, gender, sexual RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

preference, race, creed, color, national origin, Acquired-Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), AIDS-Related Complex (ARC), or disability. This nondiscrimination policy shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, failure to promote, demotion or transfer, recruitment advertising, layoffs, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

b. The consultant and its sub-consultants shall state in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the consultant that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to age, marital status, religion, gender, sexual preference, race, creed, color, national origin, Acquired -Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), AIDS-Related Complex (ARC) or disability.

c. Consultant shall make its goods, services, and facilities accessible to people with disabilities and shall verify compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act by executing Declaration of Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

d. If applicable, the consultant will send to each labor union or representative of workers with whom consultant has a collective bargaining agreement or contract or understanding, a notice advising the labor union or workers’ representative of consultant’s commitments under this nondiscrimination clause and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

e. Consultant shall submit information concerning the ownership and workforce composition of Contractor’s firm as well as its sub -Contractors and suppliers, by completing the Ownership, Ethnicity and Gender Questionnaire.

f. The Project Consultant Team attached and incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement, Exit Report and Affidavit, attached and incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement.

g. All affirmative action efforts of contractors are subject to tracking by the City . The information or data shall be used for statistical purposes only. All consultants are required to provide data regarding the make -up of their subcontractors who will perform City contracts, including the race and gender of each employee and/or subcontractor and his or her job title or function and the methodology used by the contractor to hire and/or contract with the individual or entity in question.

h. In the recruitment of sub -consultants, the City requires all consultants to undertake nondiscriminatory and equal outreach efforts, which include outreach to minorities and women -owned businesses as well as other segments of Oakland’s business community. The City Administrator will track the City’s minority and women -owned business utilization to ensure the absence of unlawful discrimination on the basis of age, marital status, religion, gender, sexual preference, race, creed, color, national origin, Acquired-Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), AIDS -Related Complex (ARC), or disability.

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

i. The City will immediately report evidence or instances of apparent discrimination in City contracts to the appropriate State and Federal agencies, and will take action against consultants who are found to be engaging in discriminatory acts or practices by an appropriate State or Federal agency or court of law, up to and including termination or debarment.

j. In the recruitment of sub-Contractors, the City of Oakland requires all Contractors to undertake nondiscriminatory and equal outreach efforts, which include outreach to minorities and women- owned businesses as well as other segments of Oakland’s business community. The City Administrator will track the City’s MBE/WBE utilization to ensure the absence of unlawful discrimination on the basis of age, marital status, religion, gender, sexual preference, race, creed, color, national origin, Acquired-Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), AIDS-Related Complex (ARC) or disability.

k. In the use of such recruitment, hiring and retention of employees or sub-Contractors, the City of Oakland requires all Contractors to undertake nondiscriminatory and equal outreach efforts which include outreach to minorities and women as well as other segments of Oakland’s business community.

7. Violation Of Federal, State, City/Agency Laws, Programs Or Policies The City may, in their sole discretion, consider violations of any programs and policies described or referenced in this section a material breach and may take enforcement action provided under the law, programs or policies, and/or terminate the contract, debar consultants from further contracts with City and/or take any other action or invoke any other remedy available under law or equity.

8. Conflict of Interest / Confidentiality
Consultant shall avoid all conflicts of interest and respect its relationship with the City by maintaining confidentiality of materials deemed confidential by law.

According to the City’s Purchasing System (OMC 2.04.050.C), “No person, firm or corporation shall be allowed to make or file or be interested in more than one bid for the same supplies, services or both.” To clarify, a firm (including, but not limited to licensed contractors and professional service providers) may not submit a proposal as a prime consultant or contractor if they are being listed as a sub-consultant or subcontractor on another proposal or bid for the same solicitation.

Exceptions include:
a. A firm may be listed on more than one proposal or bid if they are proposing under separate legal entities.
b. A firm, if not submitting as a prime consultant or contractor, may be listed as sub - consultant or subcontractor on more than one proposal or bid. c. In the case of an RFQ for On-Call Construction Services, a firm may be listed as a prime contractor or subcontractor in more than one submittal provided each submittal is for a different contractor license type (e.g. A, B, C10, C -27, etc..) or service type at the RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

sole discretion of the City.
d. No officer, director, employee or member of a Mentor- Protégé team, as defined by the LBE/SLBE Program, shall be allowed to bid or otherwise participate independently on a city contract where the mentor -protégé team is bidding or otherwise participating. E ach party is prohibited from submitting multiple bids on a city contracts.

Consultant specifically agrees to the following:

a. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest, and shall not have any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required under this project. Without limitation, the consultant represents to and agrees with the City that no conflict of interest is created between providing the City services hereunder and any interest consultant may have with respect to any other person or entity (including but not limited to any federal or state regulatory agency) which has any interest adverse or potentially adverse to the City.

b. Consultant understands and agrees to successfully provide the services requested by the project. In addition, every communication between the consultant and the City or its special counsel shall be considered to be a confidential communication between client and lawyer (see California Evidence Code Section 952), and the confidential work product of the City Administrator, City Attorney and the City’s special counsel, respectively, and therefore shall be held in strict confidence. All reports, analysis, maps, diagrams or any documents prepared or assisted in the preparation of or by the consultant, shall be considered to be prepared pursuant to said lawyer -client relationship. All of the above mentioned documents are also considered the work product of the City Administrator and shall not be communicated to any person except as specifically authorized in writing signed by the City Administrator and City Attorney.

c. The Fair Political Practices Act and/or California Government Code Section 1090, among other statutes and regulations may prohibit the City from contracting with a service provider if the service provider or an employee, officer or director of the service providers’ firm, or any immediate family of the preceding, or any sub - consultant or consultant of the service provider, is serving as a public official, elected official, employee, board or commission member of the City who will award or influence the awarding of the contract or otherwise participate in the making of the contract. The making of a contract includes actions that are preliminary or preparatory to the selection of a consultant such as, but not limited to, involvement in the reasoning, planning and/or drafting of solicitations for bids and RFPs/RFQs, feasibility studies, master plans or preliminary discussions or negotiations.

9. Prevailing
Wage Rates
This project is subject to State of California Labor Code Sections 1770 -1781, 1813, and 1815 requiring the payment of prevailing wages and compliance with other applicable requirements. Prevailing wage information, including wage rates, can be found at the RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

California Department of Industrial Relations website: https://www.dir.ca.gov/public- works/prevailing-wage.html

Depending upon the scope of work, the required contract provisions may need to include the California State Prevailing Wages (Federal “Payment of Predetermined Minimum Wage” applies only to federal-aid construction contracts). Prevailing wages will apply if the services to be performed will involve land surveying (such as flag persons, survey party chief, rodman or chainman), materials sampling and testing (such as drilling rig operators, pile driving, crane operators), inspection work, soils or foundation investigations, environmental hazardous materials and so forth. California State Prevailing Wage information is available through the California Department of Industrial Relations web site at: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/statistics_research.html.

Federally-funded projects are subject to the Davis -Bacon Act. The payment of predetermined minimum wages on Federal- aid contracts is derived from the Davis -Bacon Act of 1931 and is prescribed by 23 USC 113. Federal wage rates are not required to be physically included in the contract advertising package provided they are referenced to an Internet web site address where they can be found. However, these wage rates must be physically inserted in the final contract package signed by the City and the contractor on all Federal-aid highway construction projects exceeding $2,000 and to all related subcontracts, except for projects located on roadways classified as local roads or rural minor collectors, which are exempted.

The federal minimum wage rates are available directly from the Department of Labor Home Page under https://beta.sam.gov/ . Click on and navigate through “Search Wage Determinations”. The most current federal minimum wage rates in effect when these bid documents were advertised are:

General Decision Number CA20250018,
Modification Number 21, Revised 12/19/2025

For conformance with the federal “10-day rule,” the City shall access the federal wage rates within ten days prior to bid opening to see if updated rates have been posted. If the updated wage rates have been posted, the City shall to issue an addendum. Addenda are issued only to official plan holders of the Bid book (those who have directly obtained the bid book from iSupplier).

10. Minimum Wage Ordinance
The City’s Minimum Wage Ordinance, effective March 2, 2015, establishes a minimum hourly wage rate, requires paid sick leave, and requires payment of service charges to hospitality workers. Employers must notify employees of the annually adjusted rates by each December 15 th and prominently display notices at the job site.

Employers located in Oakland are subject to federal, state and local minimum wage laws. In RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

the event of conflicting requirements, employers shall follow the stricter requirement by paying the higher rate. For further information, please refer to:
https://library.municode.com/ca/oakland/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT5BUTAPE RE_CH5.92CIMIWASILEOTEMST

11. Prompt Payment Ordinance OMC Section 2.06.070
The Ordinance requires that consultant and its sub-consultants shall pay undisputed invoices of their sub -consultants for goods and/or services within twenty (20) business days of submission of invoices, unless specific exemptions apply, or unless the Consultant or its sub- consultants notify the City’s Prompt Payment Liaison in writing within five (5) business days that there is a bona fide dispute between the consultant or its sub -consultant and claimant.

In this case the Consultant or its sub-consultant may withhold the disputed amount but shall pay the undisputed amount.

Disputed payments are subject to investigation by the Liaison upon the filing of a compliant.

Consultant or its sub-consultants opposing payment shall provide security in the form of cash, certified check or bond to cover the disputed amount and penalty during the investigation. If Consultant or its sub-consultant fails or refuses to deposit security, the City will withhold an amount sufficient to cover the claim from the next progress payment. The City, upon a determination that an undisputed invoice or payment is late, will release security deposits or withholds directly to claimants for valid claims.

Consultant and its sub-consultants shall not be allowed to retain monies from sub-consultant payments for goods as project retention, and are required to release sub -consultant project retention in proportion to the sub -consultant services rendered, for which payment is due and undisputed, within five (5) business days of payment. Consultant and its sub-consultants shall be required to pass on to and pay sub -consultants’ mobilization fees within five (5) business days of being paid such fees by the City.

For the purpose of posting on the City's website, consultant and its sub-consultants, are required to file notice with the City of release of retention and payment of mobilization fees, within five (5) business days of such payment or release; and, consultants are required to file an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, that he or she ha s paid all sub-consultants, within five (5) business days following receipt of payment from the City. The affidavit shall provide the names and address of all sub-consultants and the amount paid to each.

Consultant and its sub -consultants shall include the same or similar provisions as those set forth above in this section in any contract with a consultant or sub -consultant that delivers goods and/or services pursuant to or in connection with a City of Oakland purchase contract.

Invoice and claim inquiries should be directed to [email protected] .

12. Arizona and Arizona-Based Businesses
In accordance with Resolution No. 82727 C.M.S., the consultant agrees that neither it nor any of its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents that will provide services under this agreement is currently headquartered in the State of Arizona, and shall not establish an Arizona business headquarters for the duration of this agreement with the City of Oakland or until Arizona RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

r
escinds SB 1070.

T
he consultant acknowledges its duty to notify Contracts and Compliance Division, Office of the City Administrator, if it’s Business Entity or any of its subsidiaries affiliates or agents subsequently relocates its headquarters to the State of Arizona. Such relocation shall be a basis for termination of this contract or agreement.

13. Nuclear Free Zone
Consultant confirms that it has read and understood Ordinance No. 11478 C.M.S., titled “An Ordinance Declaring the City of Oakland a Nuclear Free Zone and Regulating Nuclear Weapons Work and City Contracts with and Investment in Nuclear Weapons Makers,” which restricts the City from entering into professional service agreements with nuclear weapons makers unless an exemption applies. Under Ordinance No. 11478 C.M.S., it is t he City’s policy to minimize the expenditure of City funds on goods and services produced by nuclear weapons makers and Contractor is urged to comply with this policy in making purchases and subcontracts. Contractor agrees to comply with Ordinance N o. 11478 C.M.S. in the provision of services under this Agreement and certifies that it is not a nuclear weapons maker.

14. Ownership, Ethnicity and Gender Questionnaire – Schedule D The consultant shall submit information concerning the ownership and workforce composition of its firm.

15. Project Consultant Team Listing – Schedule E
This preliminary project team shall reflect the prime consultant’s understanding of the services required under this RFP or RFQ. List the prime consultant and all sub-consultants along with the anticipated percentage of work distribution. Upon completion of contract negotiations, the awarded consultant shall update this project team and work distribution by submitting a final Schedule E upon request by the City.

16. Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance – Schedule I Neither this Business Entity nor any of its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents are under contract with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement (HHS/ORR) to provide services or goods for data collection or immigration detention facilities.

17. Consultant Performance Evaluation – Schedule L1
At the end of the project, the City Project Manager will evaluate the consultant’s performance in accordance with the Consultant Performance Evaluation form.

18. Progress Payment Form – Schedule G
This Agreement is subject to the reporting of subcontractor progress payments monthly. The Schedule G form can be found on our website at
https://www.oaklandca.gov/documents/contracts-and-compliance-forms-and-schedules.

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

19. Consultant’s Proposals - Schedule M, Part A
Consultant represents that:
 Consultant has the Proposals and skills necessary to perform the services under this contract in a competent and professional manner without the advice or direction of the City; and
 the services will be performed in accordance with the generally accepted principles and practices applicable to consultant’s trade or profession; and  Consultant and its employees and sub -consultants are properly licensed, registered, and/or certified as may be required under any applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to performance of the services; and
 all services provided pursuant to this contract shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations; and
 Consultant will promptly advise City of any change in the applicable laws, regulations, or other conditions that may affect City’s program.
 This means Consultant is able to fulfill the requirements of this contract. Failure to perform all of the services required under this contract will constitute a material breach of the contract and may be cause for termination of the contract. Consultant has complete and sole discretion for the manner in which the work under this contract is performed.

20. The City’s Living Wage Ordinance – Schedule N
The selected proposer will be required to agree to comply fully with and be bound by the Living Wage Ordinance as set forth by the Oakland Municipal Code (OMC), Chapter 2.28.

Generally, the ordinance requires that, unless specific exemptions apply or a waiver is granted, all employers contracted to provide services amounting to or exceeding $25,000, shall provide nothing less than a prescribed minimum level of compensation (a living wage), as well as the provision of at least twelve (12) days off per year for sick leave.

If applicable, the selected proposer must agree to comply with the requirements and agree that it has a duty to promptly provide the City with any documents and information requested verifying its compliance, including the completion and submission of a Declaration of Compliance with the Living Wage Ordinance (Schedule N).

Oakland employers are also subject to the City of Oakland Minimum Wage law (Oakland Municipal Code section 5.92) and must pay employee wages and provide benefits consistent with the Minimum Wage law, Oakland Living Wage Ordinance, whichever are greater.

21. Equal Benefits Ordinance - Schedule N-1
The selected Contractor will be subject to the Equal Benefits Ordinance (OMC Chapter 2.32) and its implementing regulations if it receives $25,000 or more for public works or improvements to be performed or for goods or services to be purchased or grants to be provided at the expense of the city or to be paid out of moneys deposited in the treasury or out of trust moneys under the control of or collected by the city, unless specific exemptions RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

apply or a waiver is granted. The Equal Benefits Ordinance prohibits the City from contracting with entities that discriminate in the provision of employee benefits between employees with spouses and employees with domestic partners, and/or between domestic partners and spouses of such employees.

The Ordinance shall only apply to those portions of selected Contractor’s operations that occur (1) within the City of Oakland; (2) on real property outside the City of Oakland if the property is owned by the City or if the City has a right to occupy the property, and if the contract’s presence at that location is connected to a contract with the City; and (3) elsewhere in the United States where work related to a City contract is being performed.

The requirements shall not apply to subcontracts or subgrantees of the selected Bidder.

If applicable, the selected Bidder/Contractor must agree to comply with the requirements of OMC Chapter 2.32, and agree it has a duty to promptly provide the City with any documents and information requested verifying its compliance, including the completion and submission of Schedule N-1.

22. City of Oakland Campaign Contribution Limits – Schedule O This Agreement is subject to the City of Oakland Campaign Reform Act of Chapter 3.12 of the Oakland Municipal Cod e. The Campaign Reform Act prohibits consultants that are doing business or seeking to do business with the City from making campaign contributions to Oakland candidates between commencement of negotiations and either 180 days after completion of, or termination of, contract negotiations. All prime consultants must complete the Acknowledgment of Campaign Contribution Limits Form.

23. Border Wall Prohibition
– Schedule W
This contract is subject to the Border Wall Ordinance of Oakland Municipal Code, Ordinance 13459 C.M.S. The ordinance mandates and directs the City Administrator, when there is no significant additional cost (to be defined in regulations) or conflict with law, to refrain from entering into new or amended contracts to purchase professi onal, technical, scientific or financial services, goods, construction labor and materials or other services, or supplies from businesses that enter into contracts to provide such services, goods, materials or supplies to build the U.S. - Mexico border wall.

The City of Oakland shall be prohibited from entering into any contractual agreement for the purchase of services, goods, equipment, cyber network or cloud computing, internet, or cloud-based computer technology or services with any "BORDER WALL ENTITY" individual, firm, or financial institution who provides any services, goods, equipment, or information technology or cloud-based technology or services, to construct any part of the U.S. - Mexico border wall.

Schedule W shall be submitted by the Prime with its bid. All subcontractors shall be required to submit Schedule W during the contract execution process.

24. Exit Report and Affidavit – Schedule F
This Agreement is subject to the Exit Reporting and Affidavit form. The Schedule F form can RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

be found on our website at https://www.oaklandca.gov/documents/contracts-and- compliance-forms-and-schedules.
• The Prime Contractor/Consultant/Grantee must complete this form as part of the close- out process. Each LBE/SLBE sub-contractor/sub-consultant and sub-grantee (including lower tier LBE/SLBE sub-contractors/sub-consultants, sub-grantees, suppliers and truckers). The Exit Report and Affidavit must be submitted to Department of Workplace and Employment Standards (DWES) with the final progress payment application. (Remember to please complete an L/SLBE Exit Report for each listed L/SLBE sub- contractor/sub-consultant or sub-grantee).

END OF RFP
RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

APPENDICES

 APPENDIX A: City Schedules and Federal Exhibits
Part 1 - Due with Proposal
Part 2 - Due During Contract Execution Phase
Part 3 – Documents for Project Close-Out Phase
 APPENDIX B: Sample Professional Agreement
 APPENDIX C: Schedule Q – Professional Services Insurance Requirements  APPENDIX D: (other attachments)

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

APPENDIX A
PART 1 - DUE WITH PROPOSAL

City Schedules and Federal Exhibits
 Schedule E Preliminary Consultant Team Listing – Federal  Schedule I Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance  Schedule O Campaign Contribution Limits
 Schedule W Border Wall Prohibition (from Prime)
 Schedule Z Certification of Debarment and Suspension
 Exhibit 10-O1 Local Agency Consultant DBE Commitment
 Exhibit 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

Note: DATE:

SIGNED:

Attach additional page(s) if necessary.

Contractors are required to identify the ethnicity and gender of all listed firms majority owner. This information will be used for tracking purposes only. * (AA=African American) (AI=Asian Indian) (AP=Asian Pacific) (C=Caucasian) (H=Hispanic) (NA=Native American) (O=Other) (NL=Not Listed) ** (M = Male) (F = Female)
Company Name
PRIME CONSULTANT:

Address and City
Phone
Nu
mber
% of Project
Work

SCHEDULE E - FEDERAL

PROJECT CONSULTANT TEAM LISTING (PRELIMINARY)
Subconsultant
D B E
Type of Work
For Professional Services Contracts Only - To be completed by prime consultants only. The prime herewith must list al
l subconsultants regardless of tier and their respective percentages of the project work. No other subconsultants, other than those listed below shall be used without prior written approval by the City of Oakland. Provide all information listed and check the appropriate boxes. Firms must be certified with the City of Oakland in order to receive Local/Small Local Business Enterprise credits.
* Ethnicity
** Gender
not used
NAME OF RFP OR RFQ:

1 | P a g e

______________________________________________________________________

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement (HHS/ORR) Prohibition.

This Schedule must be submitted with all proposals or bids by all contractors/Consultants and their sub-contractors/subconsultants, and all vendors seeking to do business with the City of Oakland.

Compliance must be established prior to full contract execution.

I, (name)___________________________, the undersigned, _____________________________ of (Position/Title
_____________________________________________________________________________ (Business Entity) - hereinafter referred to as Business Entity and duly authorized to attest on behalf of the business Entity), declare the following:

1. Neither this Business Entity nor any of its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents are under contract with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement (HHS/ORR) to provide services or goods for data collection or immigration detention facilities. The term “data collection” includes the collection of information (such as personal information about consumers) for another purpose from that which it is ultimately used, datamining in large data bases for trends and information, threat-modeling to identify probable attackers to computer systems, predictive risk analysis to predict future events, and similar services. Additionally, this business entity does not anticipate a contract with ICE, CBP, or HHS/ORR for such work for the duration of a contract/contracts with the City of Oakland.

2. The appropriate individuals of authority are cognizant of their responsibility to notify the City’s Project Manager and invoice reviewer or the City Administrator’s Office, Chief Privacy Officer if any of this Business Entity’s subsidiaries, affiliates, or agents are under contract with ICE, CBP, or HHS/ORR for the purposes listed above.

3. To maintain compliance, upon review and approval of invoices, the contractors/vendors hereby agree to submit a declaration on company stationery attached to each invoice that the company remains in compliance with the ICE, CBP, and HHS/ORR Prohibition and will not seek or secure a contract with ICE, CBP, or HHS/ORR.

4. Upon close out or completion of deliverables and prior to issuance of final payment (while honoring the Prompt Payment Ordinance), this business entity agrees to submit a statement attached to the final invoice, under penalty of perjury, declaring full compliance with the ICE, CBP, and HHS/ORR Prohibition. I understand that an invoice is not declared fully complete and accepted unless and until the declaration of compliance is accepted.

5. If this business entity fails to disclose a contract with ICE, CBP, or HSS/ORR to provide services for data collection or immigration detention facilities, the relevant persons may be guilty of a misdemeanor and up to a $1,000 fine. Additionally, the City Administrator may to the extent permissible by law, remedy any such violations and may use all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void contracts in violation.

6. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above will not, have not, and do not plan to contract with ICE, CBP, or HHS/ORR to provide services or goods for data collection or immigration detention facilities.

Schedule I
“Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance”

2 | P a g e

PLEASE COMPLETE AND SIGN

 I declare that I understand Ordinance #13540 C.MS. Based on my understanding the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

or
 I declare that I understand Ordinance # 13540 C.MS. Based on my understanding all or a portion of the above is not true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

(Printed Name and Signature of Business Owner) (Date)

(Name of Business Entity) (Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code )

(Name of Parent Company) (If applicable)

Contacts:

Office Phone: __________________ Cell Phone:_______________ email: _____________________

For Office Use Only:

Approved/Denied/Waived

(signed) _________________________________________ ____________________ Authorized Representative Date

SCHEDULE I DB/DM 2019

SCHEDULE O
To be completed by City Representative prior to distribution to Contractor City Representative ________________________________________ Phone ___________________________ Project Spec No. ______________ Department ________________________________ Contract/Proposal Name _________________________________________________________ Contractor Name __________________________________________________________________Phone ________-________-________ Street Address ______________________________________________ City ________________, State _______ Zip __________ Type of Submission (check one) ______ Bid ______Proposal ______ Qualification ______ Amendment Individual or Business Name ________________________________________________ Phone ________-________-________ Street Address ______________________________________________ City ________________, State _______ Zip __________ The undersigned Contractor's Representative acknowledges by his or her signature the following:
_______/________/________
Signature Date
Print Name of Signer Position
To be Completed by City of Oakland after completion of the form Date Received by City: _______/________/________ By ___________________________________________________ Date Entered on Contractor Database: _______/_______/_______ By ____________________________________________________

CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CITY OF OAKLAND CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS I have read Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 3.12, including section 3.12.140, the contractor provisions of the Oakland Campaign Reform Act and certify that I/we have not knowingly, nor will I /we make contributions during the period specified in the Act.

I understand that the contribution restrictions also apply to entities/persons affiliated with the contractor as indicated in the Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 3.12.080.

If there are any changes to the information on this form during the contribution-restricted time period, I will file an amended form with the City of Oakland.

This is an ______ Original ______ Revised form (check one). If Original, complete all that applies. If Revised, complete Contractor name and any changed data.

Majority Owner (if any). A majority owner is a person or entity who owns more than 50% of the contracting firm or entity.

The Oakland Campaign Reform Act limits campaign contributions and prohibits contributions from contractors doing business with the City of Oakland and the Oakland Redevelopment Agency during specified time periods. Violators are subject to civil and criminal penalties.

FOR CONSTRUCTION, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE & PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS rev.42016

Minor Revisions: DB -3/8/2018

SCHEDULE W

BORDER WALL PROHIBITION
(This form is to be completed by Contractors and their sub-contractors, and all Vendors seeking to do business with the City of Oakland)

I, , the undersigned, a
(Name)

of
(Title) (Business Entity)

(hereinafter referred to as Business Entity am duly authorized to attest on behalf of the business Entity)

I. Neither this Business Entity nor any of its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents are under contract with any branch of the federal government to plan, design, build, support, repair and/or maintain any part of the border wall nor do we anticipate entering or competing for such work for the duration of a contract or contracts with the City of Oakland.

II. The appropriate individuals of authority are cognizant of their responsibility to notify the city contact person/Project Manager, invoice reviewer or the City Administrator’s Office of Contracts and Compliance if any of the identified above decide to compete, plan, design, build, support, repair and/or maintain any part of work or servicing the border wall.

III. To maintain compliance, upon review and approval of invo ices, the contractors/vendors hereby agree to submit attached to each invoice, a declaration on company stationery that the company remains in compliance with the Border Wall Prohibition and will not seek or secure a contract related to all aspects of the Border Wall
IV. Upon close out or completion of deliverables and prior to issuance of final payment (while honoring the Prompt Payment Ordinance) I agree to submit a statement attached to the final invoice, under penalty of perjury, declaring full compliance with the Border Wall Prohibition. I understand that an invoice is not declared fully complete and accepted unless and until the declaration of compliance is accepted.

V. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above will not, have not and do not plan to participate in the building, servicing, maintenance of the operations of the so called “Border Wall”.

 I declare that I understand Ordinance #13459 C.MS. Based on my understanding the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
 I declare that I understand Ordinance #13459 C.MS. Based on my understanding all or a portion of the above is not true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

(Printed Name and Signature of Business Owner) (Date)

(Name of Business Entity) (Street Address City, State and Zip Code)

(Name of Parent Company)

Schedule Z
Certification of Debarment and Suspension

Under the requirements of OMB Circular A-133 Supplement, part 3, Section 1, the City is required to obtain certifications that contractors and sub-grantees receiving awards exceeding $100,000 have not been suspended or debarred from participating in federally funded procurement activities.

1. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that its principals:

a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal debarment or agency.

b) Have not within a 3 year period preceding this proposal, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction under a public transaction or contract.

c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal State or local) with commission of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and

d) Have not within a 3-year period preceding th is application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default.

2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

By signing and submitting this form the prospective primary participant’s authorized representative hereby obligates the proposer(s) to the above stated conditions.

Company Name Signature of Authorized Representative

Address Type or Print Name

Area Code Phone Date Type or Print Title

Instructions for Certification A

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prosp ective primary participant is providing the certification set out below.

2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below The certification or explanation will be considered in connection w ith the department or agency’s determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the primary participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary participant know ingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Fede ral Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause of default.

4. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department/agency to whom this proposal is subm itted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns that its certification was err oneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

5. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is de barred, suspended, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covere d transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.

6. The terms “covered transaction,” “debarred,” “suspended,” “ineligible,” “lower tier covered transaction,” “participant,” “person,” “primary” covered transaction,” “principal,” “proposal” and “voluntarily excluded,” as used in this clause, ha ve the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549: 49CFR Part 76. You may contact the person to which this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

7. The prospective primary participant further agr ees by submitting this proposal that it will included the clause titled” Certification Regard ing Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion – Lower Tier Covered Transact ion,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without m odification, to all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.

8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it know s that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines this eligibility of its principals.

9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph (6) of these instru ctions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lowe r tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Fede ral Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause of default.

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

APPENDIX A
PART 2 - DUE DURING CONTRACT EXECUTION PHASE

City Schedules and Federal Exhibits

 Schedule E Federal - Project Consultant Team Listing (Final)  Schedule W Border Wall Prohibition (from all subconsultants)  Combined Schedules D&M
 Schedule N
 Schedule N-1
 Schedule S
 Exhibit 10-K Consultant Certification of Contract Costs and Financial Management System
 Exhibit 10-O2 Local Agency Consultant DBE Information

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

APPENDIX A
PART 3 – DOCUMENTS FOR PROJECT CLOSE-OUT PHASE

 Exhibit 17-F Final Report – Utilization of DBEs
 Exhibit 10-S Mandatory Consultant E valuation

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

APPENDIX B

Sample Professional Services Agreement

RFP Name
Project Name Page 1 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024

CITY OF OAKLAND

CONTRACT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF OAKLAND
AND

INSERT FULL LEGAL NAME IN ALL CAPS (NAME OF CONTRACTOR)

PARTIES AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This Professional Service Agreement (“Agreement” or “Contract”) is made by and between the CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation (“City”) and [CONTRACTOR’s FULL LEGAL NAME] (“Contractor”) (collectively the “Parties”) and shall be effective on the date the Agreement is executed by all Parties (“Effective Date”).

RECITALS

A. The City wishes to [insert a short description of services required].

B. This Agreement was competitively procured as required by Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 2.04. [or state the exception to competitive procurement and how waiver granted].

C. The City Council approved this Agreement by Resolution No. [] C.M.S. on [DATE].

D. The City Administrator has determined that this Agreement is for services that are professional, scientific, or technical and temporary in nature and that this Agreement will not result in the loss of employment or salary by any person having permanent sta tus in the competitive service.

E. Funds are available for this Agreement in [ insert Department Name] Fund ( insert fund number), [insert Project Number, if applicable].

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties to this Agreement covenant as follows:

AGREEMENT PROVISIONS

1. Scope of Services

Contractor agrees to perform the services specified in Schedule A, Scope of Services attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein by reference.

Contractor shall designate an individual who shall be responsible for communications with the City for the duration of this Agreement. The Project Manager for the City shall be Project Manager.

2. Time of Performance

RFP Name
Project Name Page 2 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024

The time for performance under this Agreement (“Term”) shall begin on Month, Day, Year and shall end Month, Day, Year. The City’s Project Manager shall issue a formal Notice to Proceed to the Consultant. Until the Consultant receives a formal Notice to Proceed, any Services the Consultant performs prior cannot be considered eligible Agreement costs for compensation.

3. Compensation and Method of Payment

Consultant shall be compensated for Services set forth in Exhibit A performed after receipt of a formal Notice to Proceed from the City’s Project Manager during the Agreement Term in accordance with Exhibit B , Billing Rates, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Payments shall be based on actual, eligible costs incurred by Consultant in performance of the Services under this Agreement but shall be capped so as not to exceed CONTRACT AMOUNT (“Capped Amount”). The maximum amount paid for the performance of Services under this Agreement shall not exceed the Capped Amount, even if the Consultant’s actual costs exceed the Capped Amount.

Consultant is to submit to the City’s Project Manager, within fifteen (15 days) of receipt of the Notice to Proceed, whether for a single project Professional Services Agreement or for discrete projects issued under On-Call Professional Services Agreements as Task Order (s), a detailed list of measurable deliverables with associated timeline for the City’s Project Manager’s approval. Payment shall be based on the City- approved list of measurable deliverables.

In the aggregate, progress payments will not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the total amount of the Contract, with the balance to be paid upon satisfactory completion of the entire Contract or task.

All invoices shall be submitted for payment on a monthly basis (unless approved otherwise in writing by the City’s Project Manager) and shall identify the completed Services along with any required supporting documentation or deliverable(s) based upon Exhibit A and the approved budget by task phase/deliverable and billing rates in Exhibit B – Billing Rates, attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein by reference. Billing Rates shall remain the same for the Agreement Term unless otherwise approved by the City’s Capital Contracts Division and entered as an amendment to this Agreement.

All invoices shall state a description of the deliverable(s) and/or Service(s) completed or provided, time period covered, the amount due and supporting documents such as time sheets for hours being billed, with billing rates, and receipts for reimbursable expenses. Payment shall be due upon City’s approval of completed work, acceptance of the deliverables, and approval of Consultant’s invoice and associated documentation. Any invoiced item that is not adequately documented or substantiated, shall be removed, or disallowed, from the approved total amount invoiced. The Consultant may resubmit request for payment of the disallowed item(s) with the next month’s (31 days) invoice with required and approved substantiating documentation.

RFP Name
Project Name Page 3 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
Progress, or other payments, shall be based on at least equivalent Services rendered, and will not be made in advance of Services rendered. In computing the amount of any progress payment (this includes any partial payment of the contract price during the progress of the work, even though the work is broken down into clearly identifiable stages, or separate tasks), the City will determine the amount that the consultant has earned during the period for which payment is being made based on the Agreement.

Eligible Consultant costs shall consist of the all Services performed under Exhibit A and at the Billing Rates shown in Exhibit B . Reasonable administrative costs may be included as part of the Exhibit B and will depend on the complexity of the Services’ preparation, planning, coordination and other activities required to complete a task, deliverable, any portion thereof, or this Agreement. Reimbursable administrative expenses are the necessary costs incidentally, but directly related to the project including the portion of overhead and administrative expenses that are directly related to t he Services provided under this Agreement in accordance with the standard accounting practices of the Consultant. The maximum markup permitted to the Consultant for subconsultant management under this agreement is ten percent (10%) and is applied at the time of invoice submission to the City.

Costs that are not eligible for reimbursement with City funds include, but are not limited to the following items:

Costs incurred by the Consultant prior to receipt of the City’s Notice to Proceed.

Travel and per diem costs (per diem includes subsistence and other related costs).

Overhead not directly related to Agreement Service(s) costs.

4. Independent Contractor

a. Rights and Responsibilities

It is expressly agreed that in the performance of the services necessary to carry out this Agreement, Contractor shall be, and is an independent contractor, and is not an employee of the City. Contractor has and shall retain the right to exercise full control and supervision of the services, and full control over the employment, direction, compensation, and discharge of all persons assisting Contractor in the performance of Contractor’s services hereunder.

Contractor shall be solely responsible for all matters relating to the payment of his/her employees, including compliance with social security, withholding, and all other regulations governing such matters, and shall be solely responsible for Contractor’s own acts and those of Contractor’s subordinates and employees. Contractor will determine the method, details, and means of performing the services described in Schedule A.

b. Contractor’s Qualifications

Contractor represents that Contractor has the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the services under this Agreement in a competent and professional manner without the advice or direction of the City. Contractor warrants that the Contractor, and the Contractor’s employees and sub-consultants are properly licensed, registered, and/or certified as may be required under any applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules,

RFP Name
Project Name Page 4 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
and regulations relating to Contractor’s performance of the Services. All Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations.

Contractor will promptly advise City of any change in the applicable laws, regulations, or other conditions that may affect City’s program. Failure to perform all of the Services required under this Agreement will constitute a material breach of the Agreement and may be cause for the City’s termination of the Agreement. Contractor has complete and sole discretion for the manner in which the work under this Agreement is performed. Prior to execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall complete and submit Schedule M, Part A, Independent Contractor Questionnaire, which shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein.

c. Payment of Income Taxes

Contractor is responsible for paying, when due, all income taxes, including estimated taxes, incurred as a result of the compensation paid by the City to Contractor for services under this Agreement. On request, Contractor will provide the City with proof of timely payment.

Contractor agrees to indemnify the City for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by the City resulting from Contractor’s failure to comply with this provision.

d. Non-Exclusive Relationship

Contractor may perform services for, and contract with, as many additional clients, persons, or companies as Contractor, in Contractor’s sole discretion, sees fit.

e. Tools, Materials, and Equipment

Contractor will supply all tools, materials, and equipment required to perform the services under this Agreement.

f. Cooperation of the City

The City agrees to comply with all reasonable requests of Contractor necessary to the performance of Contractor’s duties under this Agreement.

g. Extra Work

Contractor will do no extra work under this Agreement without first receiving prior written authorization from the City.

5. Proprietary or Confidential Information of the City

Contractor understands and agrees that, in the performance of the work or services under this Agreement or in contemplation thereof, Contractor may have access to private or confidential information which may be owned or controlled by the City and that suc h information may

RFP Name
Project Name Page 5 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
contain proprietary or confidential details, the disclosure of which to third parties may be damaging to the City. Contractor agrees that all information received from the City, or collected on behalf of the City, including personal identifying data, shall be held in confidence and used only in the performance of the Agreement. Contractor shall exercise the same standard of care to protect such information as a reasonably prudent contractor would use to protect its own proprietary data.

6. Ownership of Results

Any interest of Contractor or its Subcontractors, in specifications, studies, reports, memoranda, computations, drawings, plans, sheets , or other documents prepared by Contractor or its Subcontractors in connection with services to be performed under this Agreement shall be assigned and transmitted to the City. However, Contractor may retain and use copies for reference and as documentation of its experience and capabilities.

7. Copyright

Contractor shall timely execute and provide to the City all necessary documents to assign to the City the copyright to works created pursuant to this Agreement.

8. Audit

Contractor shall maintain (a) a full set of accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and procedures for all funds received under this Agreement; and (b) full and complete documentation of performance related matters such as benchmarks and deliverables associated with this Agreement.

Contractor shall (a) permit the City to have access to those records for the purpose of making an audit, examination, or review of financial and performance data pertaining to this Agreement; and (b) maintain such records for a period of four years following the last fiscal year during which the City paid an invoice to Contractor under this Agreement.

In addition to the above, Contractor agrees to comply with all audit, inspection, recordkeeping, and fiscal reporting requirements incorporated by reference.

9. Agents/Brokers

Contractor warrants that Contractor has not employed or retained any subcontractor, agent, company, or person other than bona fide, full-time employees of Contractor working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any subcontractor, agent, company or persons other than bona fide emplo yees any fee, commission, percentage, gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, or gift.

RFP Name
Project Name Page 6 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024

10. Assignment

Contractor shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights, duties, obligations, or interest in this Agreement or arising hereunder to any person, persons, entity, or entities whatsoever without the prior written consent of the City and any attempt to assign or transfer without such prior written consent shall be void. Consent to any single assignment or transfer shall not constitute City’s consent to any further assignment or transfer.

11. Publicity

Any publicity generated by Contractor for the project funded pursuant to this Agreement, during the term of this Agreement or for one year thereafter, will make reference to the contribution of the City of Oakland in making the project possible. The words “City of Oakland” will be explicitly stated in all pieces of publicity, including but not limited to flyers, press releases, posters, brochures, public service announcements, interviews, and newspaper articles.

City staff will be available whenever possible at the request of Contractor to assist Contractor in generating publicity for the project funded pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor further agrees to cooperate with authorized City officials and staff in a ny City -generated publicity or promotional activities undertaken with respect to this project.

12. Title of Property

Title to all property, real and personal, acquired by the Contractor from City funds shall vest in the name of the City of Oakland and shall be accounted for by means of a formal set of property records. Contractor acknowledges it is responsible for the protection, maintenance , and preservation of all such property held in custody for the City during the term of the Agreement.

The Contractor shall, upon expiration of termination of this Agreement, deliver to the City all of said property and documents evidencing title to same. In the case of lost or stolen items or equipment, the Contractor shall immediately notify the Police Department, obtain a written police report, and notify the City in accordance with “Notice” section of this Agreement.

Contractor shall provide to the City Auditor all property-related audit and other reports required under this Agreement.

Contractor shall obtain the City’s approval prior to the disposition or sale of any real or personal property acquired with City funds.

13. Insurance

Unless a written waiver is obtained from the City’s Risk Manager, Contractor must acquire and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, the policies of insurance identified in Schedule Q, Insurance Requirements, attached hereto and incorporated herein. Contractor must submit proof of insurance, which shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein.

RFP Name
Project Name Page 7 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024

14. Indemnification

a. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Contractor will indemnify and hold harmless (and at City’s request, defend) City, and each of their respective Councilmember’s, officers, partners, agents, and employees (each of which persons and organizations are referred to collectively herein as "Indemnitees" or individually as "Indemnitees") from and against any and all liabilities, claims, lawsuits, losses, damages, demands, debts, liens, costs, judgments, obligations, administrative or regulatory fines or penalties, actions or causes of action, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor.

b. City will give Contractor prompt written notice of any such claim of loss or damage and will cooperate with Contractor, in the defense and all related settlement negotiations to the extent that cooperation does not conflict with City's interests.

c. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City shall have the right if Contractor fails or refuses to defend City with Counsel acceptable to City to engage its own counsel for the purposes of participating in the defense. In addition, City shall have the right to wit hhold any payments due Contractor in the amount of anticipated defense costs plus additional reasonable amounts as security for Contractor's obligations under this Section 15. In no event shall Contractor agree to the settlement of any claim described herein without the prior written consent of City.

d. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that it has an immediate and independent obligation to indemnify and defend Indemnitees from any actions or claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contrac tor, which obligation shall arise at the time any action or claim is tendered to Contractor by City and continues at all times thereafter, without regard to any alleged or actual contributory negligence of any Indemnitees.

e. All of Contractor’s obligations under this Section 15 are intended to apply to the fullest extent permitted by law (including, without limitation, California Civil Code Sections 2782 and 2782.8) and shall survive the expiration or sooner termination of thi s Agreement.

f. The indemnity set forth in this Section 15 shall not be limited by the City’s insurance requirements contained in Schedule Q hereof, or by any other provision of this Agreement. City’s liability under this Agreement shall be limited to payment of Contractor in accord to the terms and conditions under this Agreement and shall exclude any liability whatsoever for consequential or indirect damages even if such damages are foreseeable.

15. Right to Offset Claims for Money

RFP Name
Project Name Page 8 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
All claims for money due or to become due from City shall be subject to deduction or offset by City from any monies due Contractor by reason of any claim or counterclaim arising out of: a) this Agreement; b) any purchase order; or c) any other transaction with Contractor.

16. Prompt Payment Ordinance

Contractor shall comply with the City’s Prompt Payment Ordinance, Title 2, Chapter 2.06 of the Oakland Municipal Code. The Ordinance requires that, unless specific exemptions apply, the Contractor and its subcontractors shall pay undisputed invoices of their subcontractors for goods and/or services within twenty (20) business days of receipt of invoices unless the Contractor or its subcontractors notify the City of Oakland Liaison within the Department of Workplace and Employment Standards (“Liaison”) in writing within five (5) business days that there is a bona fide dispute between the Contractor or its subcontractor and claimant, in which case the Contractor or its subcontractor may withhold the disputed amount but shall pay the undisputed amount.

Disputed payments are subject to investigation by the Liaison upon the filing of a complaint.

Contractor or its subcontractors opposing payment shall provide security in the form of cash, certified check, or bond to cover the disputed amount and penalty during the investigation. If Contractor or its subcontractor fails or refuses to deposit security, the City will withhold an amount sufficient to cover the claim from the next Contractor progress payment. The City, upon a determination that an undisputed invoice or payment is late, will release security deposits or withholds directly to claimants for valid claims.

Contractor and its subcontractors shall not be allowed to retain monies from subcontractor payments for goods as project retention, and are required to release subcontractor project retention in proportion to the subcontractor services rendered, for which payment is due and undisputed, within five (5) business days of payment. Contractor and its subcontractors shall be required to pass on to and pay subcontractors mobilization fees within five (5) business days of being paid such fees by the City. For the purpose of posting on the City’ s website, Contractor and its subcontractors, are required to file notice with the City of the release of retention and payment of mobilization fees, within five (5) business days of such payment or release; and, Contractor is required to file an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, that Contractor has paid all subcontractors, within five (5) business days following receipt of payment from the City. The affidavit shall provide the names and addresses of all subcontractors and the amount paid to each.

If any amount due by a prime contractor or subcontractor to any claimant for goods and/or services rendered in connection with a purchase contract is not timely paid in accordance with the Prompt Payment ordinance, the prime Contractor or subcontractor shall owe and pay to the claimant interest penalty in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the improperly withheld amount per year for every month that payment is not made, provided the clai mant agrees to release the prime contractor or subcontractor from any and all further interest penalty that may be claimed or collected on the amount paid. Claimants that receive interest payments for late payment under the Prompt Payment Ordinance may not seek further interest penalties on the same late payment in law or equity.

RFP Name
Project Name Page 9 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
Contractor and its subcontractors shall include the same or similar provisions as those set forth above in this section in any contract with another contractor or subcontractor that delivers goods and/or services pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement.

Prompt Payment invoice and claim forms are available at the following City of Oakland website: https://www.oaklandca.gov/resources/prompt-payment-forms or in the Department of Workplace and Employment Standards, 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 3341, Oakland, CA 94612. Invoice and claim inquiries should be emailed to [email protected].

17. Arizona and Arizona-Based Businesses

Contractor confirms that it has read and understood City Resolution No. 82727 C.M.S., which urges City Departments to the extent practicable and in instances where there is no significant additional cost to the City of conflict with the law, to refrain fro m entering into new or amended contracts to purchase goods or services from any company that is headquartered in Arizona, and urges companies to also boycott the State of Arizona and Arizona -based businesses until Arizona repeals SB 1070. Contractor agrees , in accordance with City Resolution No. 82727 C.M.S., that Contractor is not currently headquartered in the State of Arizona and shall not establish an Arizona business headquarters for the duration of this Agreement or until Arizona rescinds SB 1070.

18. Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance

Contractor confirms that it has read and understood Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 2.23, Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance , which prohibits the City from contracting with any person or entity that provides the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement (HHS/ORR) with any “data broker,” “extreme vetting,” or “detention facilities” services (as defined in Oakland Municipal Code Section 2.23.020) unless the prohibition is waived.

Contractor certifies that it has completed a Declaration of Compliance with the Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance (Schedule I) to secure this Agreement, incorporated herein, and agrees, as a material condition of this Agreement, that Contractor and its agents or subcontractors that provide goods or services to or for the City under this Agreement have not been contracted to provide ICE, CBP, or the HHS/ORR with data broker, extreme vetting, or immigration detention facilities services , and that the City, in its sole discretion shall determine such failure.

19. Border Wall Ordinance

Contractor confirms that it has read and understood Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 2.22, Border Wall Ordinance, which prohibits the City from entering into any contractual agreement for the purchase of services, goods, equipment, cyber network or cloud computing, int ernet, or cloud-based computer technology or services with any “BORDER WALL ENTITY” (as defined by Section 2.22.020 of the Oakland Municipal Code), individual, firm, or financial

RFP Name
Project Name Page 10 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
institution who provides any services, goods, equipment or information technology or cloud- based technology or services, to construction of a wall along any part of the United States - Mexico border unless the prohibition is waived.

Contractor certifies that it has completed a Declaration of Compliance with the Border Wall Ordinance ( Schedule W ) to secure this Agreement, incorporated herein, and agrees, as a material condition of this Agreement, that Contractor and its agents or subcontractors that provide goods or services to or for the City under this Agreement have not been hired to provide services, goods, products, equipment, or information or cyber technology, construction, architectural, engineering, or any professional services for the construction of the Border Wall, or any Border Wall Work or provide such services for the duration this Agreement. Contractor stipulates that failure to comply with the requirements of Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 2.22 shall constitute a material breach by Contractor of this Agreement. The City in its sole discretion shall determine such failure.

20. Dispute Disclosure

Contractors are required to disclose pending disputes with the City of Oakland. Contractor agrees to disclose and has disclosed, any and all pending disputes with the City in writing to the Project Manager. Failure to disclose pending disputes prior to execution of this Agreement or any subsequent amendment shall be a basis for termination of the Agreement.

21. Events of Default and Remedies

A. The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute a material default and breach of this Agreement by Contractor:

1. Failure to adequately perform the Work set forth in the Scope of Work;

2. The use or expenditure of funds , property, and/or information provided under this Agreement by Contractor in any manner that is not consistent with the purpose of this Agreement or in compliance with the Scope of Work attached hereto;

3. Failure of Contractor to comply with any obligations under this Agreement, or to observe or perform any other material provision of this Agreement; or

4. Contractor’s (a ) filing for bankruptcy, dissolution, or reorganization, or failure to obtain a full dismissal of any such involuntary filing brought by another party before the earlier of final relief or 60 days after the filing; ( b) making a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; ( c) applying for the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian, or liquidator, or failure to obtain a full dismissal of any such involuntary application brought by another party before the earlier of final relief or 60 days after the filing; (d) insolvency; or (e) failure, inability or admission in writing of its inability to pay its debts as they become due.

B. The City shall give written notice to Contractor of any default by specifying the nature of the event or deficiency giving rise to the default, the action required to cure the deficiency, if an action to cure is possible, and a date, which shall be not less than 30 calendar days

RFP Name
Project Name Page 11 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
from the mailing of the notice, by which such action to cure, if a cure is possible, must be undertaken. Contractor shall not be in default if Contractor cures such default within the specified cure period, or, if such default is not reasonably capable of cure within the specified period, Contractor begins to cure the default within the cure period and thereafter diligently pursues the cure to completion. Following any notice of an event of default, the City may suspend payments under this Agreement pendi ng Contractor’s cure of the specified breach. Upon an event of default that has not been cured by Contractor, the City, in its discretion, may take any of the following actions:

1. Terminate this Agreement in whole or in part;

2. Suspend payments under this Agreement;

3. Demand immediate reimbursement of any funds disbursed under this Agreement;

4. Bring an action for equitable relief (i) seeking the specific performance by Contractor of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, and/or ( ii) enjoining, abating, or preventing any violation of said terms and conditions, and/or (iii) seeking declaratory relief;

5. Bar Contractor from future funding by the City; and/or

6. Pursue any other remedy available at law or in equity.

22. Termination on Notice

The City may terminate this Agreement immediately with or without cause upon giving thirty (30) calendar days written notice to Contractor. Unless otherwise terminated as provided in this Agreement, this Agreement will terminate on Month, Day, Year.

23. Conflict of Interest

a. Contractor

The following protections against conflict of interest will be upheld:

i. Contractor certifies that no member of, or delegate to the Congress of the United States shall be permitted to share or take part in this Agreement or in any benefit arising therefrom.

ii. Contractor certifies that no member, officer, or employee of the City or its designees or agents, and no other public official of the City who exercises any functions or responsibilities with respect to the programs or projects covered by this Agreement, shall have any interest, direct or indirect in this Agreement, or in its proceeds during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.

RFP Name
Project Name Page 12 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
iii. Contractor shall immediately notify the City of any real or possible conflict of interest between work performed for the City and for other clients served by Contractor.

iv. Contractor warrants and represents, to the best of its present knowledge, that no public official or employee of City who has been involved in the making of this Agreement, or who is a member of a City board or commission which has been involved in the making of this Agreement whether in an advisory or decision- making capacity, has or will receive a direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the rules contained in California Government Code Section 1090 et seq., pertaining to conflicts of interest in public contracting. Contractor shall exercise due diligence to ensure that no such official will receive such an interest.

v. Contractor further warrants and represents, to the best of its present knowledge and excepting any written disclosures as to these matters already made by Contractor to City, that (1) no public official of City who has participated in decision-making concerning this Agreement or has used his or her official position to influence decisions regarding this Agreement, has an economic interest in Contractor or this Agreement, and (2) thi s Agreement will not have a direct or indirect financial effect on said official, the official’s spouse or dependent children, or any of the official’s economic interests. For purposes of this paragraph, an official is deemed to have an “economic interest” in any (a) for-profit business entity in which the official has a direct o r indirect investment worth $2,000 or more, (b) any real property in which the official has a direct or indirect interest worth $2,000 or more, (c) any for-profit business entity in which the official is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or m anager, or (d) any source of income or donors of gifts to the official (including nonprofit entities) if the income or value of the gift totaled more than $500 the previous year.

Contractor agrees to promptly disclose to City in writing any information it may receive concerning any such potential conflict of interest.

Contractor’s attention is directed to the conflict of interest rules applicable to governmental decision- making contained in the Political Reform Act (California Government Code Section 87100 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 18700 et seq.).

vi. Contractor understands that in some cases Contractor or persons associated with Contractor may be deemed a “city officer” or “public official” for purposes of the conflict of interest provisions of Government Code Section 1090 and/or the Political Reform Act. Contractor further understands that, as a public officer or official, Contractor or persons associated with Contractor may be disqualified from future City contracts to the extent that Contractor is involved in any aspect of the making of that future contract (including preparing plans and specifications or performing design work

RFP Name
Project Name Page 13 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
or feasibility studies for that contract) through its work under this Agreement.

vii. Contractor represents and warrants to the best of its present knowledge, that in addition to the State statutes, regulations, local ordinances, municipal code , and Charter provisions referenced in this s ection, Contractor has read and is aware of the City of Oakland Government Ethics Act (Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 2.25), including, without limitation, the provisions prohibiting Conflicts of Interest and Personal Gain set forth at OMC 2.25.040, and those prohibiting (a) the influencing of contracts with former employers and (b) nepotism, as set forth in OMC

2.25.070. Contractor agrees and acknowledges that Contractor shall adhere to the City of Oakland Government Ethics Act, to the extent Contractor is deemed a Public Servant thereunder.

viii. Contractor shall incorporate or cause to be incorporated into all subcontracts for work to be performed under this Agreement a provision governing conflict of interest in substantially the same form set forth herein. “Contractor/consultant’s duties and services under this agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering this agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project.

Contractor/consultant’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Contractor/consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this agreement.”

ix. “Contractor/consultant’s duties and services under this agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering this agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project.

Contractor/consultant’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Contractor/consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this agreement.”

RFP Name
Project Name Page 14 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024

b. No Waiver

Nothing herein is intended to waive any applicable federal, state , or local conflict of interest law or regulation

c. Remedies and Sanctions

In addition to the rights and remedies otherwise available to the City under this Agreement and under federal, state, and local law, Contractor understands and agrees that, if the City reasonably determines that Contractor has failed to make a good faith effort to avoid an improper conflict of interest situation or is responsible for the conflict situation, the City may (1) suspend payments under this Agreement, (2) terminate this Agreement, and/or (3) require reimbursement by Contractor to the City of any amounts disbursed under this Agreement. In addition, the City may suspend payments or terminate this Agreement whether or not Contractor is responsible for the conflict of interest situation.

24. Non-Discrimination/Equal Employment Practices

Contractor shall not discriminate or permit discrimination against any person or group of persons in any manner prohibited by federal, state , or local laws . During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor agrees as follows:

a. Contractor and Contractor’s subcontractors, if any, shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, marital status, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, race, creed, color, national origin, mental or physical disability (including but not limited to Acquired-Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), and AIDS- Related Complex (ARC)), military or military veteran status, or any other legally-protected class. This nondiscrimination policy shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
employment, upgrading, promotion or failure to promote, demotion or transfer, recruitment advertising, layoffs, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

b. Contractor and Contractor’s Subcontractors shall state in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Contractor that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to age, marital status, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, race, creed, color, national origin, mental or physical disability (including by not limited to AIDS, and ARC), military or military veteran status, or any other legally-protected class.

c. Contractor shall make its goods, services, and facilities accessible to people with disabilities and shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and all other applicable federal, state, and local disability rights legislation.

RFP Name
Project Name Page 15 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
d. If applicable, Contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with whom Contractor has a collective bargaining agreement or contract or understanding, a notice advising the labor union or workers’ representative of Contractor’s commi tments under this nondiscrimination clause and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

e. Contractors are required to disclose any disciplinary or investigatory actions against the Contractor by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Department of Fair Employment & Housing (DFEH), or the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP). Contractor agrees to disclose and has disclosed, any and all such disciplinary or investigatory actions in writing to the Project Manager. Failure to disclose such action prior to execution of this Agreement or any subsequent amendment shall be a basis for termination of the Agreement.

25. Local and Small Local Business Enterprise Program (L/SLBE) Contractor shall comply with the City of Oakland’s Local and Small Local Business Enterprise Program (L/SLBE). The City’s current L/SLBE Program guidelines may be accessed via the following link:
https://cao-94612.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/City-of-Oakland-Local-Small- Local-Business-Program-10-2-2024.pdf

Contractor understands and agrees to the following:

a. Preference Points – Preference points are awarded based on the level of local, small local and very small local business participation that is proposed by contractors during the competitive solicitation process.

b. Maintaining Participation – As a condition of the award of this Contract, Contractor must achieve and maintain the levels of local, small local, or very small local business participation for which preference points were earned during the competitive solic itation process or the levels of participation agreed upon by the Parties during negotiation of this Agreement. Failure to achieve and maintain the proposed levels of participation may result in the imposition of penalties as set forth in the above -referenced Local and Small Local Business Enterprise Program guidelines.

c. Contractor shall submit information concerning the ownership and workforce composition of Contractor’s firm as well as its subcontractors and suppliers, by completing Schedule D, Ownership, Ethnicity, and Gender Questionnaire, and Schedule E, Project Consultant Team, which shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein.

26. Living Wage Ordinance

If the contract amount of this Agreement is equal to or greater than $25,000, Contractor must comply with the Oakland Living Wage Ordinance , Title 2, Chapter 2.28 of the Oakland Municipal Code. The Living Wage Ordinance requires that nothing less than a prescribed minimum level of compensation (a living wage) be paid to, among others, employees of

RFP Name
Project Name Page 16 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
service contractors (consultants) of the City. Oakland employers are also subject to the City of Oakland Minimum Wage law (see next section ) and must pay employees wages and provide benefits consistent with the Minimum Wage law or Oakland Living Wage Ordinance, whichever are greater.

If applicable, Contractor certifies that it has submitted a completed Declaration of Compliance with the Living Wage Ordinance (Schedule N ) to secure this Agreement, which is incorporated herein, and, unless specific exemptions apply or a waiver is granted, Contractor agrees that it must provide the following to its employees who perform services under or related to this Agreement:
a. Minimum compensation and Health Benefits – Effective July 1 st of each year,
Contractor shall pay adjusted Living Wage rates, dependent on whether health benefits are included . The current Living Wage Rates for each year can be found at https://www.oaklandca.gov/departments/workplace-employment-standards.

Contractor agrees to pay the rates as upwardly adjusted each year no later than April 1 in proportion to the increase at the immediately preceding December 31 over the year earlier level of the Bay Region Consumer Price Index as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor . Contractor shall provide proof that health benefits are in effect for those employees at the lower living wage rate no later than 30 days after execution of the Contract.

b. Compensated days off – Said employees shall be entitled to twelve compensated days off per year for sick leave, vacation, or personal necessity at the employee's request, and ten uncompensated days off per year for sick leave. Employees shall accrue one compensated day off per month of full time employment. Part-time employees shall accrue compensated days off in increments proportional to that accrued by full -time employees. The employees shall be eligible to use accrued days off after the first six months of employment or consistent with company policy, whichever is sooner. Paid holidays, consistent with established employer policy, may be counted toward the provision of the required 12 compensated days off. Ten uncompensated days off shall be made available, as needed, for personal or immediate family illness after the employee has exhausted his or her accrued compensated days off for that year.

c. Federal Earned Income Credit - To inform employees that he or she may be eligible for Earned Income Credit (“EIC”) and shall provide forms to apply for advance EIC payments to eligible employees. There are several websites and other sources available to assist Contractor. Web sites include but are not limited to: http://www.irs.gov for current guidelines as prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service.

d. Contractor shall provide to all employees written notice of its obligation to eligible employees under the City’s Living Wage requirements. Said notice shall be posted prominently in communal areas of the work site(s) and shall include the above-referenced information.

e. Contractor shall provide all of the above required written notices and forms in English, Spanish or other languages spoken by a significant number of employees within 30 days of each employee’s start of work under or related to this Agreement.

RFP Name
Project Name Page 17 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024

f. Reporting – Contractor shall maintain a listing of the name, address, hire date, occupation classification, rate of pay, and benefits for each of its employees. Contractor shall provide a copy of said list to the Department of Workplace and Enforcement Standards , on a quarterly basis, by March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 for the applicable compliance period. Failure to provide said list within five days of the due date will result in a penalty of five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each day that the list remains outstanding (OMC Section 2.28.110.C) . Contractor shall maintain employee payroll and related records for a period of three (3) years after expiration of the compliance period.

g. Contractor shall require subcontractors that provide services under or related to this Agreement to comply with all of the foregoing Living Wage provisions. Contractor shall include the above-referenced provisions in its subcontracts and by signature confirms subcontractor compliance.

27. Minimum Wage Ordinance

Oakland employers are subject to Oakland’s Minimum Wage Law, Chapter 5.92 of the Oakland Municipal Code, whereby Oakland employees must be paid the City’s current Minimum Wage rate. Employers must notify employees of the annually adjusted rates by each December 15
th and prominently display notices at the job site. The law also requires paid sick leave for employees and payment of service charges collected for their services. This contract is also subject to Oakland’s Living Wage Ordinance (see previous section) and must pay employees wages and provide benefits consistent with the City’s Living Wage Ordinance or the Minimum Wage Law , whichever are greater. For further information, please visit the following website: https://www.oaklandca.gov/topics/minimum-wage-paid- leave-service-charges

28. Equal Benefits Ordinance
If the contract amount of this Agreement is equal to or greater than $25,000, t his Agreement is subject to the City’s Equal Benefits Ordinance (“EBO”), Title 2, Chapter 2.32 of the Oakland Municipal Code and its implementing regulations , which prohibits the City from contracting with entities that discriminate in the provision of employee benefits between employees with spouses and employees with domestic partners, and/or between domestic partners and spouses of such employees.

The EBO only applies to those portions of a contractor’s operations that occur (1) within the City of Oakland; (2) on real property outside the City if the property is owned by the City or if the City has a right to occupy the property, and if the contractor’s presence at that location is connected to a contract with the C ity; and (3) elsewhere in the United States where work related to a city contract is being performed. The requirements of the EBO shall not apply to subcontracts or subcontractors of any contractor.

If applicable, Contractor agrees to comply with the requirements of Oakland Municipal Code, Chapter 2.32, and agrees it has a duty to promptly provide to the C ity documents and information verifying its compliance.

RFP Name
Project Name Page 18 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024

29. City of Oakland Campaign Contribution Limits
If this Agreement requires Council approval, it is subject to the City’s Campaign Reform Act, Title 3, Chapter 3.12 of the Oakland Municipal Code, and its implementing regulations. The City of Oakland Campaign Reform Act prohibits contractors that are doing business or seeking to do business with the City of Oakland from making campaign contributions to Oakland candidates between commencement of negotiations and either 180 days after completion of or termination of, contract negotiations. If applicable, Contractor certifies that it has completed a signed certification form (Schedule O, Acknowledgment of Campaign Contribution Limits) to secure this Agreement, incorporated herein, and agrees to comply with Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 2.32.

30. Nuclear Free Zone Ordinance

Contractor confirms that it has read and understood Ordinance No. 11478 C.M.S., titled “An Ordinance Declaring the City of Oakland a Nuclear Free Zone and Regulating Nuclear Weapons Work and City Contracts with and Investment in Nuclear Weapons Makers,” which restricts the City from entering into professional service agreements with nuclear weapons makers unless an exemption applies. Under Ordinance No. 11478 C.M.S., it is the City’s policy to minimize the expenditure of City funds on goods and services produced by nuclear weapons makers and Contractor is urged to comply with this policy in making purchases and subcontracts. Contractor agrees to comply with Ordinance No. 11478 C.M.S. in the provision of services under this Agreement and certifies that it is not a nuclear weapons maker.

31. Slavery Era Disclosure

Contractor confirms that it has read and understood the Slavery Era Disclosure Ordinance, Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 9.60, which requires contractor s providing (1) insurance services or (2) financial services to the city of Oakland (including, but not limited to, any bank in which the city deposits public funds and any investment managers), whether subject to a competitive bid or not, and (3) each textile, tobacco, railroad, shipping, rice and/or sugar company doing business with the city, including but not limited to, such businesses with a city franchise, to disclose information related to the legacy of slavery.

If applicable, Contractor certifies that it has completed a signed Slavery Era Disclosure Affidavit (Schedule S) to secure this Agreement, incorporated herein, and agrees to comply with Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 9.60.

32. Political Prohibition

Subject to applicable State and Federal laws, Contractor agree that moneys paid pursuant to this Agreement shall not be used for political purposes, sponsoring or conducting candidate ’s meetings, engaging in voter registration activity, nor for publicity or propaganda purposes designed to support or defeat legislation pending before federal, state or local government.

33. Religious Prohibition

RFP Name
Project Name Page 19 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
Contractor understands and agrees that t here shall be no religious worship, instruction, or proselytization as part of, or in connection with the performance of this Agreement.

34. Business Tax Certificate

Contractor shall obtain and provide proof of a valid City business tax certificate. Said certificate must remain valid for the duration of this Agreement.

35. Compliance with State and/or Federal Standards

By executing this Agreement, Contractor certifies that Contractor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal or state assistance programs. Contractor has submitted Schedule Z , Certification of Debarment and Suspension, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

36. Abandonment/Termination of Project

The City may abandon or indefinitely postpone the project or the services for any or all of the projects under this Agreement at any time. In such event, the City shall give Contractor thirty (30) days written notice of such abandonment and termination of Agreement. In the event of abandonment prior to completion of the final drawings, if applicable, and cost estimates, Contractor shall have the right to expend a reasonable amount of additional time to assemble work in progress for the purpose of proper filing and closing the job. Prior to expending said time, Contractor shall present to the City a complete report of said proposed job closure and its costs, and the City may approve or reject all or any part of said proposed costs . Such additional time shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total time expended to the date of notice of termination. All charges thus incurred and approved by the City, together with any other charges outstanding at the time of termination, shall be payable by the City within thirty (30) days following submission of a final statement by Contractor.

Should the project or any portion thereof be abandoned, the City shall pay the Contractor for all services performed up to the effective date of termination due to abandonment in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

37. Validity of Contracts

This Agreement shall not be binding or of any force or effect until it is: a) approved by resolution of the City Council if required by the Oakland City Charter, Oakland Municipal Code Title 2.04 or Oakland City Council Rules of Procedure, b) approved as to form and legality by the Office of the City Attorney, and c) signed by the City Administrator or his or her authorized designee.

38. Governing Law

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

39. Notice

RFP Name
Project Name Page 20 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024
If either party shall desire or be required to give disclosures or notice to the other, such disclosure or notice shall be given in writing, via facsimile , email, or other electronic transmission and concurrently by prepaid U.S. certified or registered mail, addressed to the recipient as follows:

City of Oakland Legal Name of Contractor in CAPS
OPW Capital Contracts Division Principal’s Name
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 4314 Address
Oakland, CA 94612 City State Zip
Email: [email protected] Email:

Attn: Project Manager Phone#:

Any party to this Agreement may change the name or address of representatives for the purpose of this Notice Section by providing written notice to all other parties ten (10) business days before the change is deemed effective.

40. Entire Agreement of the Parties

This Agreement supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or written, between the parties with respect to the rendering of services by Contractor for the City and contains all of the representations, covenants, and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of those services. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any parties, which are not contained in this Agreement, and that no other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement will be valid or binding.

41. Modification

Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing and signed by all parties to this Agreement.

42. Severability/Partial Invalidity

If any term or provision of this Agreement, or the application of any term or provision of this Agreement to a particular situation, shall be finally found to be void, invalid, illegal , or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, then notwithstanding such determination, such term or provision shall remain in force and effect to the extent allowed by such ruling and all other terms and provisions of this Agreement or the application of this Agreement to other situation shall remain in full force and effect.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any material term or provision of this Agreement or the application of such material term or condition to a particular situation is finally found to be void, invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, then the Parties hereto agree to work in good faith and fully cooperate with each other to amend this Agreement to carry out its intent.

43. Time of the Essence
Contractor agrees that time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

RFP Name
Project Name Page 21 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024

44. Commencement, Completion, and Closeout

It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to coordinate and schedule the work to be performed so that commencement and completion take place in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

Any time extension granted to Contractor to enable Contractor to complete the work must be in writing by the City and shall not constitute a waiver of rights the City may have under this Agreement.

If Contractor fails to complete the work by the scheduled date or by an extended date, the City shall be released from all of its obligations under this Agreement.

Within thirty (30) days of completion of the performance under this Agreement, Contractor shall make a determination of any and all final costs due under this Agreement and shall submit a requisition to the City for such final and complete payment (including without limitations any and all claims relating to or arising from this Agreement). Contractor’s failure to timely submit a complete and accurate requisition for final payment shall relieve the City of any further obligations under this Agreement, including, without limitation, any obligation for payment of work performed or payment of claims by Contractor.

45. Counterpart Signatures

This Contract may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be an original and such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Contract. The parties shall be entitled to electronically sign and transmit this Contract (whether by facsimile, PDF, or other email transmission), which signature shall be binding on the signing party or the party on whose behalf the document has been signed. Any party providing an electronic signature agrees to prompt ly execute and deliver to the other parties an original signed Contract upon request.

46. Authority

The persons signing below represent and warrant that they have authority to bind their respective party, and all necessary approvals to sign on behalf of their respective party have been obtained.

47. Inconsistency

If there is any inconsistency between this Agreement and the attachments/exhibits hereto, the text of this main Agreement shall prevail.

[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]

RFP Name
Project Name Page 22 of 25 Rev. 12/1/2024

City:

CITY OF OAKLAND,
a California municipal corporation

END OF ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING ON-CALL SERVICE AGREEMENT

Contractor:

INSERT FULL LEGAL NAME IN ALL
CAPS,
a California corporation [CONFIRM
CORPORATE STATUS]

___________________________________
Signature (Date)

___________________________________
Print Name

___________________________________
Title

_______________________________
City Administrator’s Office (Date)

_______________________________
Department Head (Date)

Approved for form and legality:

_______________________________
City Attorney’s Office (Date)

City Resolution No. _________________
Account No.:

Business License No. :

RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

A PPENDIX C
Schedu
le Q – Professional Services Insurance Requirements
Schedule Q REVISED 09122019: ASL
Schedule Q INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS (Revised 09/12/2019) a. General Liability, Professional Liability Contractor shall procure, prior to commencement of service, and keep in force for the term of this contract, at Contractor's own cost and expense, the following policies of insurance or certificates or binders as necessary to represent that coverage as specified below is in place with companies doing business in California and acceptable to the City. If requested, Contractor shall provide the City with copies of all insurance policies. The insurance shall at a minimum include: i. Commercial General Liability insurance shall cover bodily injury, property damage and personal injury liability for premises operations, independent contractors, products-completed operations personal & advertising injury and contractual liability. Coverage shall be on an occurrence basis and at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence Form CG 00 01) Limits of liability: Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability (CGL) and, if necessary, commercial umbrella insurance with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence. If such CGL insurance contains a general aggregate limit, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. ii. Automobile Liability Insurance. Contractor shall maintain automobile liability insurance for bodily injury and property damage liability with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident. Such insurance shall cover liability arising out of any auto (including owned, hired, and non- owned autos). Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001. iii. Compensation insurance as required by the laws of the State of California, with statutory limits, and statutory coverage may include Liability coverage, with limits not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 policy limit bodily injury by disease, and $1,000,000 each employee bodily injury by disease. The Contractor certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of section 3700 of the California Labor Code, which requires every employer to provide Workers' Compensation coverage, or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code. The Contractor shall comply with the provisions of section 3700 of the California Labor Code before commencing performance of the work under this Agreement and thereafter as required by that code.

Schedule Q REVISED 09122019: ASL
Professional Liability/ Errors and Omissions insurance, if determined to be required by HRM/RMD, appropriate to the with limits not less than $2,000,000 each claim and $2,000,000 aggregate.If the professional liability/errors and omissions insurance is written on a claims- made form:The retroactive date must be shown and must be before the date of thecontract or the beginning of work.Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must beprovided for at least three (3) years after completion of the contractwork.If coverage is cancelled or non-renewed and not replaced with anotherclaims made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contracteffective date, the contractor must purchase extended period coverage for a minimum of three (3) years after completion of work.Liability Insurance: If the Contractor is engagedin: environmental remediation, emergency response, hazmat cleanup orpickup, liquid waste remediation, tank and pump cleaning, repair orinstallation, fire or water restoration or fuel storage dispensing, then forsmall jobs (projects less than $500,000), the Contractor must maintainPollution Liability Insurance of at least $00,000 for eachoccurrence and in the aggregate. If the Contractor is engaged inenvironmental sampling or underground testing, then Contractor must alsomaintain Errors and Omissions (Professional Liability) of $00,000 peroccurrence and in the aggregate.Sexual/Abuse insurance. If Contractor will have contact with personsunder the age of 18 years, or provides services to persons with or Dementia, or provides Case Management services, or provides Housingservices to vulnerable groups (i.e., homeless persons) Contractor shallmaintain sexual/molestation/abuse insurance with a limit of not less than$1,000,000 each occurrence and $1,000,000 in the aggregate. Insurancemust be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for atleast three (3) years after completion of the contract work.vii.Technology Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) OR CyberLiability Insurance, if determined to be required by HRM/RMD,$2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Consultant in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, alteration of electronic information, extortion and network security. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines and Schedule Q REVISED 09122019: ASL
penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.viii.Commercial Crime Insurance, if determined to be required byHRM/RMD,shall cover loss due to employee dishonesty, computer andfunds transfer fraud, forgery or alteration, money and securities, and theft of asis with limits not lessthan $1,000,000 each occurrence.Terms Conditions and EndorsementsThe aforementioned insurance shall be endorsed and have all the followingconditions:Insured Status (Additional Insured): Contractor shall provide insured status naming the City of Oakland, its Councilmembers, directors, officers, agents, employees and volunteers as insureds under theCommercial General Liability policy. General Liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 (11/85) or both CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 forms, if later revisions used). If Contractor submits the ACORDInsurance Certificate, the insured status endorsement must be set forth on an ISO form CG 20 10 (or equivalent). A STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INSURED STATUS ON THE ACORD INSURANCE CERTIFICATE FORM IS INSUFFICIENT AND WILL BE REJECTEDAS PROOF OF MEETING THIS REQUIREMENT; andCoverage afforded on behalf of the City, Councilmembers, directors,officers, agents, employees and volunteers shall be primary insurance.Any other insurance available to the City Councilmembers, directors,officers, agents, employees and volunteers under any other policies shallbe excess insurance (over the insurance required by this Agreement); andCancellation Notice: Each insurance policy required by this clause shallprovide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to theEntity; andThepolicy shall be endorsed with a waiver ofsubrogation in favor of the City for all work performed by the contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors; andCertificate holder is to be the same person and address as indicated in theof this Agreement; andInsurer shall carry insurance from admitted companies with an A.M. BestRating of A VII, or better.

Schedule Q REVISED 09122019: ASL
c. Replacement of Coverage In the case of the breach of any of the insurance provisions of this Agreement, the City may, at the City's option, take out and maintain at the expense of Contractor, such insurance in the name of Contractor as is required pursuant to this Agreement, and may deduct the cost of taking out and maintaining such insurance from any sums which may be found or become due to Contractor under this Agreement. d. Insurance Interpretation All endorsements, certificates, forms, coverage and limits of liability referred to herein shall have the meaning given such terms by the Insurance Services Office as of the date of this Agreement. e. Proof of Insurance Contractor will be required to provide proof of all insurance required for the work policies if, and when, requested. Failure to provide the insurance proof requested or failure to do so in a timely manner shall constitute ground for rescission of the contract award. f. Subcontractors Should the Contractor subcontract out the work required under this agreement, they shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall maintain separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. As an alternative, the Contractor may require all subcontractors to provide at their own expense evidence of all the required coverages listed in this Schedule. If this option is exercised, both the City of Oakland and the Contractor shall be named as additional insured under the Liability policy. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all the requirements stated herein. The City reserves the right to perform an insurance audit during the project to verify compliance with requirements. g. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its Councilmembers, directors, officers, agents, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.

Schedule Q REVISED 09122019: ASL
h. Waiver of Subrogation Contractor waives all rights against the City of Oakland and its Councilmembers, officers, directors, employees and volunteers for recovery of damages to the extent these damages are covered by the forms of insurance coverage required above. i. Evaluation of Adequacy of Coverage The City of Oakland maintains the right to modify, delete, alter or change these requirements, with reasonable notice, upon not less than ninety (90) days prior written notice. J. Higher Limits of Insurance If the contractor maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, The City shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the contractor. End of Schedule Q RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

APPENDIX D
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG)
Eligible Activities and Program
EECBG PROGRAM NOTICE 23-01
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25, 2023

SUBJECT: GUIDANCE FOR ELIGIBILITY OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND

CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
Contents
PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................2 SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................2 LEGAL AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................2 GUIDANCE .....................................................................................................................................2 ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY CATEGORIES ......................................................................................................6 Category (1) Strategy Development and Implementation ................................................................7 Category (2) Retaining Technical Consulting Services .......................................................................8 Category (3) Residential and Commercial Building Audits .............................................................. 10 Category (4) Financial Incentives for Energy Efficiency ................................................................... 12 Category (5) Energy Efficiency Retrofit Grants for Government Agencies and Nonprofit Organizations ............................................................................................................................... 14 Category (6) Energy Efficiency and Conservation Programs for Buildings and Facilities ................... 16 Category (7) Conservation of Transportation Energy ..................................................................... 18 Category (8) Building Codes and Inspection Services ...................................................................... 20 Category (9) Energy Distribution Technologies .............................................................................. 22 Category (10) Material Conservation Programs ............................................................................. 24 Category (11) Reduction, Capture, and Use of Landfill Gases ......................................................... 25 Category (12) Replacement of Traffic Signals and Street Lighting ................................................... 26 Category (13) On-site Renewable Energy On or In a Government Building ..................................... 28 Category (14) Programs for Financing, Purchasing, and Installing Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy, and Zero-emission Transportation (and associated infrastructure) Measures and Capital Investments, Projects, and Programs for Leveraging Public and Private Sector Funds ..................... 30 LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF EECBG PROGRAM FUNDS ................................................................ 33

Page | 2

PURPOSE
To provide guidance on the eligibility of activities under the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program.

SCOPE
The provisions of this guidance apply to recipients of Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) EECBG Program funds.

LEGAL AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND
The EECBG Program is authorized under Title V, Subtitle E of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), as amended,1 and signed into Public Law (PL 110-140) on December 19, 2007. All awards made under this program shall comply with applicable laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 CFR Part 200 and 2 CFR Part 910 and Section 40552 of IIJA.

GUIDANCE
The purpose of the EECBG Program is to assist eligible state, local, and tribal governments (collectively referred to as “eligible entities”) in implementing strategies to:
• Reduce fossil fuel emissions in a manner that is environmentally sustainable and, to the maximum extent practicable, maximizes benefits for local and regional communities; • Reduce the total energy use of the eligible entities; • Improve energy efficiency in the transportation sector, the building sector, and other appropriate sectors;2
• Build a clean and equitable energy economy that prioritizes disadvantaged communities and promotes equity and inclusion in workforce opportunities and deployment activities, consistent with the Justice40 Initiative.

These stated purposes describe the overall intent of the EECBG Program. Entities may develop various programs and projects that address one or more of the purposes and each activity an entity undertakes is not required to meet all the stated purposes. Entities may choose from a range of eligible activities, as defined in Section 544 of EISA
3 as amended by Section 40552(a) of the IIJA (Public Law 117-58).

DOE updated this guidance from the version issued in 2011 (EECBG Program Notice 10-021) to reflect the changes Congress made to EISA when it signed IJJA into law. This updated version provides guidance to EECBG Program grantees regarding the types of eligible activities that are considered allowable use of funds under one or more of the 14 eligible activity categories for the EECBG Program.4 Recipients of EECBG Program grants (including entities receiving sub-grants) or vouchers can use this guidance to determine eligible activities that support EECBG Program goals and implementation strategies. The

1 42 U.S.C. 17151 et seq.
2 42 U.S.C. 17152(b).
3 42 U.S.C. 17154
4 This guidance only addresses categories 1-14 outlined in Section 544 of EISA. Category 15 is defined in law as “any other appropriate activity, as determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.”
Page | 3

guidance also identifies activities that are prohibited or where limitations on use of funds exist, as established by the EECBG statute or determined by DOE. This guidance is not intended to be exhaustive.

If an eligible entity has a question regarding the eligibility of a specific activity, the eligible entity should contact the EECBG Program at [email protected] or their Project Officer.

In general, the overall objective of each eligible activity should be the attainment of, or the plan to attain, increased energy efficiency and conservation, or fossil fuel reduction. These activities should bear in mind an equitable distribution of community investment and projects serving disadvantaged communities, in line with the Justice40 Initiative.

Projects related to regular maintenance or repairs are not eligible. Eligible entities may apply their funds to one or more projects, as long as each project falls within one of the 14 categories of eligible uses of funds.

Equity and Environmental Justice
Per President Biden’s Executive Order 14008, the Federal Government has established the goal that 40 percent of the overall benefits of certain Federal investments flow to disadvantaged communities 5 (“DACs”).6 This government-wide effort is called the Justice40 Initiative. The EECBG Program is a Justice40-covered program and thus contributes to the goal that 40 percent of the overall benefits of federal investments in clean energy and climate solutions flow to DACs. DOE has released General Guidance on Justice40 Implementation designed to help eligible entities and other interested parties incorporate Justice40 Initiative goals into DOE-funded projects. 7 DOE has identified the following benefits that can flow to DACs as a result of EECBG Program funding.

Specifically, benefits include, but are not limited to measurable direct or indirect or positive project outcomes that achieve or contribute to the following in DACs:
1) a decrease in energy burden;
2) a decrease in environmental exposure and burdens;
3) an increase in access to low-cost capital;
4) an increase in job creation, the clean energy job pipeline, and job training for individuals; 5) increases in clean energy enterprise creation and contracting (e.g., minority-owned or disadvantaged business enterprises);
6) increases in energy democracy, including community ownership; 7) increased parity in clean energy technology access and adoption; and 8) an increase in energy resilience.

5 Also referred to as underserved, overburdened, and frontline communities. 6 Pursuant to Executive Order (EO) 14008, “Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad,” January 27, 2021, and the Office of Management and Budget’s Interim Justice40 Implementation Guidance M -21-28, DOE recognizes DACs as defined and identified by the White House Council of Environmental Quality’s Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST), which can be located at https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/. 7 Final DOE Justice40 General Guidance 072522.pdf (energy.gov) Page | 4

Further, the EECBG Program encourages eligible entities to include the participation of underserved communities8 and underrepresented groups in the activities they undertake with EECBG Program funds.

EECBG Program eligible entities are highly encouraged to include contractors and sub-contractors from historically underrepresented groups9,10 in their project scoping. Further, Minority Serving Institutions,11 Minority Business Enterprises, Minority Owned Businesses, Woman Owned Businesses, Veteran Owned Businesses, or entities located in an underserved community that meet EECBG Program eligibility requirements are encouraged to be considered as sub-recipients for proposed EECBG Program-funded projects.

Blueprints and Technical Assistance
DOE has developed or identified resources to assist EECBG Program recipients with development of their energy efficiency and conservation strategies and project implementation plans, including Blueprints and Technical Assistance available from the EECBG Program and other DOE programs. These resources are intended to supplement the award funding received through either a formula or competitive award from DOE.

Blueprints are step-by-step roadmaps of energy project and programs that guide EECBG Program entities to success. While not an exclusive list, the blueprints highlight a select number high-impact projects and programs based on proven practices that entities can choose to follow. Though entities may use their EECBG Program funds for a wide array of energy-related activities, those that choose to spend their EECBG Program funds exclusively on “key activities” listed in the blueprints should expect a streamlined and expedited application review because these key activities fall within eligible uses of EECBG Program funds, and most of the blueprint activities are covered by NEPA Statements of Work.

8 The Office of Management and Budget Interim Implementation Guidance for Justice40 defines a disadvantaged community as either: (1) a group of individuals living in geographic proximity (such as census tract), or (2) a geographically dispersed set of individuals (such as migrant workers or Native Americans), where either type of group experiences common conditions.
9 According to the National Science Foundation’s 2019 report titled, “Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering”, women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minority groups— blacks or African Americans, Hispanics or Latinos, and American Indians or Alaska Natives—are vastly underrepresented in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields that drive the energy sector. For example, in the U.S., Hispanics, African Americans and American Indians or Alaska Nat ives make up 24 percent of the overall workforce, yet only account for 9 percent of the country’s science and engineering workforce. DOE seeks to inspire underrepresented Americans to pursue careers in energy and support their advancement into leadership positions. https://www.energy.gov/articles/introducing-minorities-energy-initiative 10 Note that Congress recognized in section 305 of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act of 2017, Public Law 114-329: “[I]t is critical to our Nation’s economic leadership and global competitiveness that the United States educate, train, and retain more scientists, engineers, and computer scientists; (2) there is currently a disconnect between the availability of and growing demand for STEM-skilled workers; (3) historically, underrepresented populations are the largest untapped STEM talent pools in the United States; and (4) given the shifting demographic landscape, the United States should encourage full participation of individuals from underrepresented populations in STEM fields.”
11 Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs), including Historically Black Colleges and Universities/Other Minority Institutions as educational entities recognized by the Office of Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education, and identified on the OCR's Department of Education U.S. accredited postsecondary minorities’ institution list.

Page | 5

The blueprints span a wide variety of topic areas: energy planning, energy efficiency, renewable energy, transportation infrastructure, workforce development, and financing. For more information, see the Blueprints webpage.

Blueprint Topics:12
• Blueprint 1. Energy Planning
• Blueprint 2A. Energy Efficiency - Energy Audits and Building Upgrades • Blueprint 2B: Energy Efficiency and Electrification in Buildings - Energy Savings Performance Contracts:
• Blueprint 2C: Building Efficiency & Electrification Campaign • Blueprint 2D: Building Performance Standards & Stretch Codes • Blueprint 3A: Solar + Storage Power Purchase Agreements and Direct Ownership • Blueprint 3B: Community Solar
• Blueprint 3C: Solarize Campaign
• Blueprint 3D: Renewable Resource Planning
• Blueprint 4A: Electric Vehicles for Fleets and Fleet Electrification • Blueprint 4B: Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure for the Community • Blueprint 5: Unlocking Sustainable Financing Solutions for Energy Projects and Programs - Revolving Loan Funds
• Blueprint 6: Workforce Development Community

National Environmental Protection Act Requirements
DOE must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) prior to authorizing the use of Federal funds. DOE must also consider the effects on historic properties, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Additionally, DOE must consider the impacts to floodplains and wetlands, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 1022—Compliance with Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements. To streamline these required reviews, DOE carries out each of these reviews under the umbrella of its NEPA review. Grantees should review and follow the NEPA determination (the form that DOE uses to document NEPA reviews) in their award documents for restrictions, and the list of activities that have been categorically excluded from further NEPA review.

NEPA Statements of Work (SOW) have been created and placed on the EECBG Program Formula Application Hub webpage to provide expedited reviews of blueprints and other activities. The NEPA SOWs apply to different applicants and include either ground disturbing activities or nonground disturbing activities. Applicants should review the SOWs to ensure the correct one is selected, if applicable. SOWs with ground disturbing activities require quarterly reporting for all activities. DOE staff will require submission of an Environmental Questionnaire (EQ1) for a NEPA review through the Project Management Center (PMC) if a NEPA SOW is not utilized.

12 This list shows proposed Blueprints by topic area as of April 2023. Blueprint topic areas may be added or revised, based on grantee and stakeholder interests, and effectiveness in achieving program goals. For additional information, visit the Blueprints webpage.

Page | 6

ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY CATEGORIES
EISA, as revised by Section 40552 of IIJA, specifies 14 categories of eligible uses of EECBG Program funds.

DOE is providing guidance below regarding the types of eligible activities that are covered by the 14 categories, including examples of eligible activities, technical assistance opportunities, and items for consideration. This guidance on eligible activities is not intended to be comprehensive. If an eligible entity has a question regarding the eligibility or allowability of a specific activity, the eligible entity should contact their Project Officer, or email the EECBG Program at [email protected].

Page | 7

Category (1) Strategy Development and Implementation

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Development and implementation of an energy efficiency and conservation strategy

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• This category only applies to eligible local and tribal governments. State governments are ineligible to apply their EECBG Program funds to strategy development. • The activity must be for the development, in support of the development, or in support of the implementation of either a strategy submitted pursuant to the EECBG Program or a general strategy that outlines goals for energy efficiency or conservation.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Development of an energy efficiency and conservation strategy if one is not submitted with application
• Development of the energy efficiency and conservation elements of an energy-related plan such as a climate action plan or local or tribal government’s sustainability plan • Expansion of an existing strategy to address new goals

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES
• Blueprint 1: Energy Planning
• The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is providing interested EECBG Program grantees one-on-one technical assistance and customized support to develop their Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategies. Grantees can sign up by emailing NREL directly at:

[email protected]. Funding is limited; requests will be considered based on available funding and type of support requested.

IITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
• Develop strategies around clearly defined, measurable, and ambitious goals for advancing energy efficiency and clean energy.
• Ensure that strategies are informed by stakeholder feedback and include opportunities for continued stakeholder engagement, with a particular focus on soliciting feedback from underrepresented and disadvantaged communities. EECBG Program recipients are encouraged to actively seek participation and feedback from a diverse range of stakeholders that reflects the demographics of their community.
• Incorporate equity and environmental justice objectives in developing energy efficiency and conservation goals and associated implementation strategies. • Take a holistic approach that incorporates a variety of technologies and addresses the needs of different populations within the community leveraging tools such as the DOE State and Local Planning for Energy (SLOPE) Platform, a free, easy-to-use online platform to support data-driven state and local energy and decarbonization planning.

Page | 8

Category (2) Retaining Technical Consulting Services

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Retaining technical consultant services to assist the eligible entity in the development of such a strategy, including—
A. Formulation of energy efficiency, energy conservation, and energy usage goals; B. Identification of strategies to achieve those goals— a. through efforts to increase energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption; and b. by encouraging behavioral changes among the population served by the eligible entity; C. Development of methods to measure progress in achieving the goals; D. Development and publication of annual reports to the population served by the eligible entity describing—
a. the strategies and goals; and
b. the progress made in achieving the strategies and goals during the preceding calendar year; and
E. Other services to assist in the implementation of the energy efficiency and conservation strategy

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• This activity area refers to retaining technical consultant services to assist the eligible entity in the development and implementation of an energy efficiency and conservation strategy, including developing methods to measure progress in achieving the goals identified in the strategy, and developing and publishing annual reports, such as dissemination of energy plans and progress updates.
• This category is only available to eligible entities that are units of local government or tribes that received funds under the EECBG Program.
• The activity for which the eligible entity is seeking to retain technical consulting services must support one or more elements of strategy development and implementation developed under Category 1.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Formulation of energy efficiency, energy conservation, and energy usage goals, methods to achieve those goals or measure progress, and the publication of annual reports discussing progress
• Identification and development of an equity-centered strategy to achieve 2030 carbon neutral goals through the energy efficiency and conservation strategy • Developing a detailed roadmap, as part of the energy efficiency and conservation strategy, to reduce costs and improve energy efficiency in communities and households with high energy burdens
• Development of internal metrics and evaluation system for strategies and measures in the energy efficiency and conservation strategy that address clean energy and climate resiliency objectives in the community
• Strategic planning for electrification of government transportation fleets Page | 9

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES
• Blueprints 1-6: Each of these blueprints can be used as a guide towards select EECBG Program activities. The key activities described in each blueprint, including planning and data analysis, can be conducted either by a member of the EECBG Program grantee’s internal staff or by external contractors or consultants.
• The National Renewable Energy Laboratory can provide interested EECBG Program eligible entities with direct technical assistance and customized support around energy planning including goal development and options analysis. Eligible entities can submit a request for TA by emailing NREL directly at [email protected]. Funding is limited; requests will be considered based on available funding and type of support requested. • The technical assistance voucher pathway may also be a good option for entities that are primarily interested in obtaining technical support services, such as planning, analysis, and strategy development related to this category.13
• Additional technical assistance around specific technology areas is available through various DOE offices and national laboratories. For additional information, visit the EECBG Technical Assistance webpage.

ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
• Consider local objectives, staff capacity, and support needs when selecting consultants. Look for firms with prior expertise and knowledge of local or tribal government energy efficiency, renewable energy, electrification or sustainability programs, including development of place- based strategies.
• Consider selecting eligible firms that reflect diversity in their business ownership and staff, understand local community needs, and are experienced in place-based approaches. • Engage underrepresented or underserved groups to ensure that their needs are considered and addressed during technical consultant service delivery (e.g., community input sessions, equitable access to programs and financial opportunities.)

13 For formula-eligible local governments and tribes only. Entities must select either a grant or voucher for their EECBG formula award.

Page | 10

Category (3) Residential and Commercial Building Audits

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Conducting residential and commercial building energy audits

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity should be for conducting energy audits of residential and commercial buildings;14,15 • The activity must occur within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity; and • Upgrades or improvements to buildings associated with the audits are an eligible use of funds.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Energy assessments to understand usage patterns in a portfolio of buildings and benchmark performance, including benchmarking building energy performance in the ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager Tool
• Installing energy upgrades in homes or commercial businesses recommended as the result of an audit
• Any activities that support or facilitate the conduct of energy assessments of residential or commercial buildings

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES
• Blueprint #2A: Energy Efficiency - Energy Audits and Building Upgrades • The federal government maintains several tools to assist with building energy efficiency, which are described in the blueprint, including ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager, DOE Building Energy Asset Score, and Home Energy ScoreTM, which are online platforms to collect, organize and analyze energy data for commercial and residential buildings, and identify and prioritize energy efficiency improvements. In addition, DOE developed the Energy Data Management Guide designed to support state and local governments in developing a data-driven approach to energy management.

ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
• Consider ensuring that energy assessments are implemented in communities that have traditionally experienced energy injustice or have disproportionate energy burdens by using

14 Energy audits include assessments of residential and commercial buildings to evaluate the energy performance of the building, and identify and prioritize energy savings opportunities, including operational or behavioral changes.

Assessments may include recommendations for installation of energy efficiency measures, renewable energy and/or grid-interactive systems, such as battery storage, and energy monitoring systems. 15 For the purpose of eligibility under the EECBG Program, “building” generally means a usually roofed and walle d structure built for permanent use. Commercial buildings include all buildings in which at least half of the of floor space is used for a purpose that is not residential (used as a dwelling for one or more households), manufacturing/industrial (used for processing or procurement of goods, merchandise, raw materials or food) or agricultural (used for the production, processing, sale, storage, or housing of agriculture process, including livestock), so they include building types that might not traditionally be considered “commercial,” such as schools, correctional institutions, and building uses for religious worship.

Page | 11

tools such as the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool and Low-Income Energy Affordability Data (LEAD) Tool and partnering with relevant community stakeholders. • Coordinate energy assessment activities with existing federal, state, local, and utility energy efficiency programs, as well as existing and anticipated sources of additional funding. Many utilities offer free or discounted energy assessments (i.e., ‘audits’) for residential and commercial buildings. Energy assessments can serve as a first step to further energy-saving, clean energy, and electrification measures that could be otherwise publicly funded. • Coordinate energy assessment activities with energy efficiency and conservation elements of any existing or planned energy-related plan, such as a climate action plan or local or tribal government’s sustainability plan. Factor in the energy impacts of long-lifetime building upgrades, and their implications for existing climate or sustainability plans. • Consider conducting an initial energy assessment to better understand energy usage patterns across a given portfolio of buildings and identify and prioritize buildings for further assessment.

Page | 12

Category (4) Financial Incentives for Energy Efficiency

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Establishment of financial incentive programs for energy efficiency improvements

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity must be for a financial incentive program, such as a rebate, loan, energy savings performance contracts, or other financing program.
• The financial incentive program must be for the purpose of improving energy efficiency; and • The financial incentives must be limited to resident, non-profits, government entities, or businesses within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity. • The activity may include financial incentive programs established by states, including sub-grants from states to local governments or tribes, such as a revolving loan fund. • For local governments and Indian tribes only: there is a limitation on utilizing EECBG Program formula grant funds for the development and capitalization of a Revolving Loan Fund of the greater of 20% of the award allocation or $250,000. Eligible entities may contribute grant funding to an existing revolving loan fund – they need not establish a new one. • EECBG Program funds used for financing programs must be tracked and reported separately from non-EECBG Program funds, including other federal financing programs, such as the Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund Capitalization Grant Program available to States. • While this Category addresses financial incentives specifically for energy efficiency, financing for renewable energy systems may be an eligible activity under Category 14.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs)
• Loan programs such as: revolving loan funds, loan guarantees, loan-loss reserves or credit enhancements, on-bill financing, and energy efficient mortgage programs • Non-loan financial assistance programs such as: grants, rebates, tax credits, tax exemptions, fee waivers, interest rate buydowns, bonds
• Other financial incentive program for energy efficiency improvements, such as formulation of 501(c)3 Green Bank Entities

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES
• Blueprint #2B: Energy Efficiency and Electrification in Buildings - Energy Savings Performance Contracts
• Blueprint #2C: Building Electrification Campaign
• Blueprint #5: Unlocking Sustainable Financing Solutions for Energy Projects and Programs – Revolving Loan Funds

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• Financial incentive programs should be designed to be self-sustaining. • Consider opportunities to leverage or coordinate EECBG formula funds with rebates, financial incentives and financing programs funded by the IIJA or Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), such as Page | 13

SEP Revolving Loan Funds, Home Energy Rebates, and the U.S. EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Fund.
• Leverage private capital to achieve greater impact by partnering with non-profit Green Banks or other sources of private capital.
• Coordinate financial incentive activities with energy efficiency and conservation elements of any existing energy-related plan, such as a climate action plan or local or tribal government’s sustainability plan. Factor in the energy impacts of long-lifetime building upgrades, and their implications for existing climate or sustainability plans. • Seek to design programs to mitigate historical inequities in access to capital and financing to further environmental justice by addressing barriers to accessing capital, such as credit score and debt-to-income ratios. See the State and Local Solution Center for program design resources and examples, such as:
o Clean Energy for Low-Income Communities Accelerator (CELICA) Toolkit; o State and Local Planning for Energy (SLOPE) Platform; and o Energy Efficiency Financing for Low- and Moderate-Income Households: Current State of the Market, Issues, and Opportunities.

Page | 14

Category (5) Energy Efficiency Retrofit Grants for Government Agencies and Nonprofit Organizations

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
The provision of grants to nonprofit organizations and governmental agencies for the purpose of performing energy efficiency retrofits

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity is for energy efficiency retrofits performed by government agencies or nonprofit organizations (these retrofits may be in residential buildings as long as the government or nonprofit is performing the retrofit). The retrofit may be of equipment (e.g., an HVAC system and associated controls, appliances, or lighting) or a building; • The retrofit must result in energy savings (e.g., kwh/BTUs) or improved energy efficiency; • The activity must not be for new construction or non-replacement equipment; • The activity must occur within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Energy efficiency retrofit measures, including weatherization, installation of efficient heating and cooling systems and appliances, cool roofs, and water efficiency measures • Energy management systems, including grid-interactive equipment such as smart thermostats, battery storage systems, and building energy management systems • Building electrification measures, including the installation of heat pumps, heat pump water heaters, residential or commercial cooking equipment, and associated wiring and panel upgrades

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES
• Blueprint #2A: Energy Efficiency - Energy Audits and Building Upgrades • Blueprint #2B: Energy Efficiency and Electrification in Buildings - Energy Savings Performance Contracts
• Blueprint #5: Unlocking Sustainable Financing for Energy Projects and Programs – Revolving Loan Funds

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• Take a whole-building approach to retrofits that recognizes the interactive effects and co- benefits of different technologies, rather than focusing on a specific technology or end use. • Consider coordinating (also referred to as ‘braiding’) EECBG Program grant funding with other local, state, and federal programs such as the Better Buildings Initiative, Weatherization Assistance Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Climate Pollution Reduction Grants, IRA Home Energy Rebates (forthcoming), federal tax incentives or USDA’s Community Facilities Program; or utility energy efficiency programs, including financing and incentives for energy efficiency improvements.
• Consider the energy impacts of long-lifetime building retrofits and their broader implications for existing climate or sustainability plans. Perform energy assessments and retrofits in Page | 15

communities that have traditionally experienced energy injustice or have disproportionate household energy burdens by using tools such as the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool and Low-Income Energy Affordability Data (LEAD) Tool and partnering with relevant community stakeholders.

Page | 16

Category (6) Energy Efficiency and Conservation Programs for Buildings and Facilities

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Development and implementation of energy efficiency and conservation programs for buildings and facilities within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity, including— A. Design and operation of the programs;
B. Identifying the most effective methods for achieving maximum participation and efficiency rates;
C. Public education;
D. Measurement and verification protocols; and
E. Identification of energy efficient technologies

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity must be for the development and/or implementation of an energy efficiency or energy conservation program. An eligible use of funds may include the design and operation of the program and installation of energy efficiency equipment, including building energy management systems and controls.
• The activity must be related to buildings or facilities;16 and • The activity must impact buildings or facilities within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Workforce development/training programs supporting eligible activities, such as training community members on green technology installation or residential and commercial energy audits
• Programs for public education including training or workshops • Development and implementation of building performance standards, including benchmarking and disclosure requirements for the purpose of promoting energy efficiency in commercial buildings
• Development and implementation of measures and verification protocols • Programs to partner with local non-profits and community organizations to support weatherization, efficiency retrofits and technologies, and installations • Programs to promote architecture, design, and engineering work for energy efficient buildings • Non-capital strategies to improve facility efficiency through an Energy Data Management Program and/or operations and maintenance strategies such as Strategic Energy Management (or similar methods)
• Development of an energy rating, disclosure and/or labeling system for the purpose of promoting energy efficiency in residential or commercial buildings

16 For the purpose of eligibility under the EECBG Program, “facility” generally means an installation, building, group of buildings, or group of structures designed to support a related purpose.

Page | 17

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES
• Blueprint 2A: Energy Efficiency – Energy Assessments and Building Upgrades • Blueprint 2B: Efficiency for portfolio of government buildings: Energy Saving Performance Contracts
• Blueprint 2C: Building Electrification Campaign
• Blueprint 3: Building Performance Standards and Stretch Codes • Blueprint 5: Unlocking Sustainable Financing Solutions for Energy Projects and Programs - Revolving Loan Funds
• In addition to providing one-on-one customized technical assistance for governments pursuing building code updates, the DOE Building Energy Codes Program also provides technical assistance for jurisdictions interested in exploring Building Performance Standards programs. • The federal government maintains several tools to assist with building energy efficiency, which are described in the blueprints, including ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager and DOE Building Energy Asset Score which are online platforms to collect and organize building energy data. In addition, DOE developed the Energy Data Management Guide designed to support state and local governments in developing a data-driven approach to energy management.

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• Achieve a double bottom line of economic justice and energy justice by prioritizing disadvantaged communities in workforce development training programs. • Design programs that can leverage other local, state, and federal funding, such as the DOE Better Buildings Initiative, Weatherization Assistance Program, and EPA Climate Pollution Reduction Grants.
• Coordinate buildings and facilities programs with energy efficiency and conservation elements of any existing energy-related plan such as a climate action plan or local or tribal government’s sustainability plan. Factor in the energy impacts of long-lifetime building upgrades and their implications for existing climate or sustainability plans.

Page | 18

Category (7) Conservation of Transportation Energy

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Development and implementation of programs to conserve energy used in transportation, including— A. Use of flex time by employers;
B. Satellite work centers;
C. Development and promotion of zoning guidelines or requirements that promote energy efficient development;
D. Development of infrastructure, such as bike lanes and pathways and pedestrian walkways; E. Synchronization of traffic signals; and
F. Other measures that increase energy efficiency and decrease energy consumption

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity must result in or support the conservation of transportation fuel within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity.
• Conservation of transportation fuel may be for the population (e.g., privately owned vehicles) within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity or for government purposes (e.g., government fleets) • Eligible alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) can span a range of transportation fuel conservation technologies and fuel types (e.g., light and medium duty electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid vehicles).
• A reduction in greenhouse gas emissions that result from transportation fuel may also be considered conservation of transportation fuel.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Improvement of energy efficiency of government vehicle fleets through the purchase of electric, hybrid, or alternative fuel vehicles such as buses, recycling / waste collection vehicles, etc. • Micromobility programs, devices and associated facilities, including conventional bicycles, e- bicycles, e-scooters, and other personal transport devices for public use17 • Addition of bike lanes, pathways, or other alternative transportation infrastructure • Geomapping for ideal placement of electric vehicle charging stations and infrastructure • Purchase and installation of electric vehicle charging stations and equipment • Enhancing commuter lots to encourage increased use of public transportation • Strategies to reduce vehicle miles travelled, including the use of satellite offices, flex time, telecommuting policies, and implementation of carpooling or vanpooling strategies • Development and promotion of zoning and siting guidelines or requirements that promote energy efficient development
• Implementing planning measures to improve transportation efficiency, including the development and promotion of alternative transportation infrastructure, synchronizing traffic

17 For more information on micromobility devices and transportation systems, see:
https://highways.dot.gov/public-roads/spring-2021/02# and https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26386/transit-and-micromobility Page | 19

signals, and mapping the ideal placement of vehicle charging and other alternative fueling infrastructure

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES
• Blueprint #5: Unlocking Sustainable Financing Solutions for Energy Projects and Programs – Revolving Loan Funds

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• For a project to qualify for EECBG Program funds under Category 7, its focus must be for the conservation of transportation fuel within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity. • Consider equity and environmental justice in determining placement of EV charging stations and ensure stations are affordable and accessible to all residents (including multifamily households), to promote equitable access to electric vehicle charging infrastructure. • An alternative fuel vehicle (AFV) refers to a vehicle that does not rely on traditional gasoline, but rather other power sources, including battery electric vehicles (BEVs), plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) and hybrid vehicles. Vehicles utilizing biodiesel, ethanol, or natural gas are also considered alternative fuel vehicles.18 When determining AFVs for purchase, be sure to consider which have the lowest carbon emissions and operational costs. • Complementary federal funding for transportation efficiency and electrification measures may become available from additional programs, including grant programs administered by DOE, the DOE/DOT Joint Office of Energy and Transportation, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
• Many current state and federal programs offer funds for the development and placement of electric vehicle charging. Efforts to place additional alternative fueling infrastructure should be in coordination with these programs to ensure rural and disadvantaged communities and households not yet being served are prioritized.

18 For additional information on alternative fuel vehicles by fuel type and technology, visit the Alternative Fuels Data Center at: https://afdc.energy.gov/.

Page | 20

Category (8) Building Codes and Inspection Services

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Development and implementation of building codes and inspection services to promote building energy efficiency

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity must be for the development, adoption and/or implementation of building codes, inspection services or trainings/workshops to promote building energy efficiency. • Programs for development, adoption and implementation of stretch codes that exceed baseline energy codes, such as green building standards, are eligible under this category. • The development of energy efficiency rating and/or labeling systems for the purpose of promoting energy efficient devices, equipment, or buildings are eligible under this category. • The activity must occur within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Adoption and implementation of building energy codes, including supporting the adoption and implementation of model building energy codes or stretch codes for energy efficient residential and commercial buildings
• Training and certification support for architects, builders, building inspectors, code officials, and other stakeholders that are responsible for implementing building codes • Development, adoption, and implementation of a Building Performance Standard, including benchmarking and disclosure requirements
• Conducting an energy code field study, which would document typical design and construction practices, target areas for improvement through workforce education and training initiatives, and quantify energy efficiency and environmental impacts in buildings

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES
• Blueprint #2D: Building Performance Standards & Stretch Codes • The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) provides technical assistance grants to support the implementation of updated building energy codes to encourage more efficient and resilient buildings. For more information on EERE funding opportunities and resources available to support implementation of updated building energy codes, visit: the EERE Building Codes webpage.
• The Office of State and Community Energy Programs (SCEP) plans to provide technical assistance grants to assist states and units of local government that have authority to adopt and implement the latest model energy codes (i.e., 2021 IECC & ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2019), zero energy building codes, or other codes or standards that achieve equivalent or greater energy savings. Up to $1 billion in funding is available, through 9/30/29. • The DOE Building Energy Codes Program provides $225 million in technical assistance grants to support building code development and implementation, as well as promoting alignment about building codes and performance standards.

Page | 21

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• The legal authority for local government entities to develop, adopt, or implement more stringent building energy codes varies by state, with some states prohibiting or limiting local code adoption, whereas others delegate code adoption to local jurisdictions. Other states may provide either a uniform model Stretch Energy Code for municipal adoption, or Reach Codes, which provide optional standards for energy efficiency that exceed the state’s mandatory code requirements.19 The DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) provides information on state and local code adoption, including information on the status of code adoption by state20 and state code adoption laws (which also includes status of code adoption by jurisdiction).21 BECP has also developed stretch code modules based on technologies, measures, or practices (or optimized combinations) that can be adopted as a stretch code or directly into state and local building energy codes.22
• Due to the limited capacity of local code enforcement officials, eligible entities may consider energy codes with alternative compliance pathways or explore strategies to reduce building officials’ workload, such as third-party enforcement procedures. • Prioritize resources to increase inspection capacity in historically energy-burdened and disadvantaged communities as identified using the Justice40 tools, such as CEJEST.

19 For additional information on stretch and reach codes, see Stretch Codes (Advanced Codes) - New Buildings Institute. https://newbuildings.org/code_policy/stretch-codes-advanced-codes/ 20 BECP Status of State Energy Code Adoption: https://www.energycodes.gov/state-portal 21 BECP Municipal Building Energy Policies: https://public.tableau.com/views/Top100MetroDatabase - PrimaryCityCode-V4/MetroResidentialCodeMinandHR_1?:language=en- US&:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link
22 BECP Stretch Codes: https://www.energycodes.gov/stretch-codes Page | 22

Category (9) Energy Distribution Technologies

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Application and implementation of energy distribution technologies that significantly increase energy efficiency, including—
A. Distributed resources; and
B. District heating and cooling systems

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The application and implementation of energy distribution technologies that significantly increase energy efficiency, including distributed resources and district heating and cooling systems.
• The activity must result in a significant increase in energy efficiency within the jurisdiction of the eligible activity.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Microgrid technologies
• District heating and cooling systems
• Combined heat and power systems (CHP)
• Cogeneration systems
• Energy Storage systems

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITY
• Blueprint: Solar + Storage: Power Purchase Agreements and Direct Ownership • Blueprint 6: Unlocking Sustainable Financing for Energy Projects and Programs - Revolving Loan Funds
• Resources around CHP are available from DOE Better Buildings Program can be found here. • Resources around grid modernization are available through the DOE Grid Deployment Office can be found here.
• Additional technical assistance around specific technology areas may be available through various DOE offices and national laboratories. For the latest, visit the EECBG Technical Assistance webpage.

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• Renewable energy, storage, and CHP can provide revenue streams while grid-connected, and these energy and cost savings may lower the overall cost of a microgrid and allow for the incorporation of additional microgrid components. When integrated into a microgrid, distributed energy technologies can also increase survival time during a grid outage when fuel supplies are limited.

Page | 23

• Implementing energy efficiency measures in conjunction with renewable energy, storage, and/or CHP can reduce the cost of each of these systems by allowing a smaller system to meet the reduced energy needs of the facility.
• Leverage federal tax incentives where feasible, such as the Inflation Reduction Act Home Energy Credits.
• CHP technologies are most applicable to sites that have a reliable gas supply and steady thermal and electric loads such as industrial operations; commercial operations such as hospitals, nursing homes, or hotels; and institutional and residential sites such as schools, universities, prisons, or multi-family buildings. If CHP with gas is considered, be sure to consider the expected lifetime of the CHP system and how it aligns with broader jurisdictional goals in existing climate and/or sustainability plans.
• Consider district heating configurations that further reduce emissions, such as combined renewable energy configurations (e.g., solar, wind, steam, sustainably sourced fuels) and power systems or geothermal district heating.
• Prioritize sites that directly serve the community and that provide one or more infrastructure and services to the community, such as community centers, water and wastewater treatment facilities, police and fire stations, schools, libraries, and other facilities. These sites could benefit from microgrid, CHP and/or storage systems by lowering energy costs and enhancing community resilience, such as providing backup power or emergency shelter in the event of a natural disaster or extended power outage, especially when combined with onsite renewable investments described in Category 14.

Page | 24

Category (10) Material Conservation Programs

STATUTORY LANGAUGE
Activities to increase participation and efficiency rates for material conservation programs, including source reduction, recycling, and recycled content procurement programs that lead to increases in energy efficiency

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity must be for the purpose of increasing the participation in and/or the efficiency rates of a material conservation program (e.g., source reduction, recycling, and recycled content procurement programs); and
• The activity must occur within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity. • If the activity is a recycled content procurement program within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity, there must be an associated increase in energy efficiency and/or conservation of fuel.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• The cost of vehicles required for a materials conservation/recycling program, such as recycling trucks
• Municipal waste reduction programs, including education and outreach • Establishing or expanding policies and programs for materials reuse and recycling, including equipment and facilities and associated tracking and reporting systems. • Organic and food waste recovery and recycling via food waste recovery programs, and organics recycling, such as composting, and anaerobic digesters for clean renewable electricity generation)
• Expanding infrastructure and/or participation in existing recycling programs

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• Consider the energy consumption associated with producing and recycling different materials, as well as the environmental implications of their disposal. • Consider coordination with other local jurisdictions to develop facilities that can serve multiple jurisdictions.

Page | 25

Category (11) Reduction, Capture, and Use of Landfill Gases

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
The purchase and implementation of technologies to reduce, capture, and, to the maximum extent practicable, use methane and other greenhouse gases generated by landfills or similar sources

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity must be for the purchase and implementation of technology, for the purpose of reducing, capturing, or using methane or other greenhouse gases generated by landfills or similar sources; and
• The activity must occur within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Reducing the carbon emissions of landfills or similar waste-related sources, including wastewater treatment plants, operations producing food waste, dairy farms, and other animal operations, through measures to reduce, capture and use methane and other greenhouse gases • Anaerobic digestion systems
• Utilization of landfill gas for electricity generation • Direct use of landfill gas to offset the use of other fuels • Conversion of landfill gas to renewable natural gas

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• Activities in this category may present an opportunity to lessen the burden of environmental regulatory requirements through the reduction, capture, and use of landfill gases. • Cogeneration systems, like those discussed in Category 9 of this document, can use landfill gas to generate electricity and thermal energy.
• Additional information, including tools and resources for reducing or avoiding landfill methane emissions, is available from the U.S. EPA’s Landfill Methane Outreach Program (LMOP).

Additional information on renewable natural gas systems and a database of renewable natural gas projects are available from the Alternative Fuels Data Center and the Renewable Natural Gas Database.

Page | 26

Category (12) Replacement of Traffic Signals and Street Lighting

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Replacement of traffic signals and street lighting with energy efficient lighting technologies, including— A. Light emitting diodes; and
B. Any other technology of equal or greater energy efficiency

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity must be for the replacement of traffic signals, street lights23 or street signs; • The replacement of traffic signals or street lights must be light emitting diodes (LEDs) or other technology of equal or greater energy efficiency. Traffic signals and street light replacements may include solar panels that power the street lights so long as the panels are part of a replacement effort that installs LEDs or other technology of equal or greater efficiency for lamps;
• Generally, only the cost of replacement lamp is eligible unless replacement/upgrade of supporting structure (e.g., posts) is necessary to support the replacement of the lamps. • The activity must occur within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• LEDs and any other technology of equal or greater energy efficiency • Computerized traffic management systems, installed on street lights, to minimize vehicle-based traffic congestion during peak driving hours

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITY
• The Better Buildings Outdoor Lighting Accelerator Toolkit provides tools and resources, including a decision tree for upgrading or replacing public outdoor lighting systems, technical support resources, and lessons learned.
• The Municipal Solid-State Street Lighting Consortium (MSSLC) helps local governments make informed decisions on the purchase of LED street lighting and maximize the energy savings.

Resources include lighting specifications, financing resources, technical reports, presentations, and FAQs on outdoor street lighting, including resources on lighting selection and design considerations.

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• The replacement of a lighting fixture, an arm, a pole, or any part of a light is an eligible use of funds if the more efficient lighting technology necessitates such a replacement. However, regular maintenance is an ineligible cost. For example, EECBG Program funds cannot be used to replace a rotten pole due to insufficient maintenance. LED lights should be procured with strong

23 A “street light” is an outdoor source of light that is raised and that is intended to provide functional illumination to the area below the light.

Page | 27

warranty terms and meet certifications (e.g., ENERGY STAR or otherwise) to ensure energy performance, longevity and lighting quality over time.
• When considering which locations to make street light improvements, consider incorporating approaches to ensure equitable access to street light improvements, such as scoring criteria that consider equity, safety, and access.

Page | 28

Category (13) On-site Renewable Energy On or In a Government Building

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Development, implementation, and installation on or in any government building of the eligible entity of onsite renewable energy technology that generates electricity from renewable resources, including— A. Solar energy;
B. Wind energy;
C. Fuel cells; and
D. Biomass.

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• The activity must be for the development, implementation, and installation of onsite renewable energy technology (e.g., solar energy, wind energy, fuel cells, or biomass); • The installation of the renewable energy technology must be on, in or under a government building24 of the eligible entity (the renewable technology is considered installed on a government building if it is installed on a government-owned site and connected to the government building behind the meter); and
• The renewable energy technology must be for the generation of electricity, or result in more efficient heating/cooling. The renewable energy source need not provide a building’s entire electricity usage and not all of the electricity needs to physically go into the government building.
• The installation of renewable energy technologies on commercial buildings, or other non- government buildings or sites, is not an eligible use of funds under Category 13. Renewable energy technologies, however, are eligible for installation on non-governmental buildings under Category 14, as part of programs for financing and installing energy efficiency, renewable energy, and zero emissions transportation systems, including financing programs, grants, incentives or rebates.25

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
• Financing mechanisms that enable this activity such as power purchase agreements for solar PV installations on multiple government buildings

24 For the purpose of eligible under the EECBG Program, “government building of the eligible enti ty” generally means a building built by or for the use of the government that is the grantee/recipient of award funds. This includes buildings owned or leased by the eligible entity. This does NOT include state, Federal, or other government buildings that are not government buildings of the eligible entity.

In the case of tribal governments, exclusions from the definition of tribal government buildings are privately owned tribal housing and commercial buildings; facilities owned by 501(c) (3) entities (unl ess the organization was chartered and delegated by the Tribe to act on its behalf); and those owned by a Federal Agency (e.g., U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, etc.) 25 Entities proposing to purchase and install renewable energy technologies on government buildings may include the proposed activities under either Category 13 or 14.

Page | 29

• Installation of renewable energy technologies (e.g., solar energy, wind energy, fuel cells, or biomass) at or on government property

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITY
• Blueprint 4A: Solar + Storage - Power Purchase Agreements and Direct Ownership • Blueprint 4D: Renewable Resource Planning
• National Renewable Energy Lab provide technical assistance to Local Governments around Waste-to-Energy
• Additional technical assistance around specific technology areas, including solar, may be available through various DOE offices and national laboratories. For the latest, visit the EECBG Technical Assistance webpage.

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• In addition to locational and structural characteristics (such as roof conditions, shading, orientation, etc.), considering the projects’ proximity to electrical infrastructure is critical for solar and wind projects (behind-the-meter projects exempted). • Leveraging eligible energy efficiency and conservation activities can reduce the cost of on-site renewable energy investments by meeting a government building’s energy requirements with less on-site generation capacity.
• Activities under this category should align with the local policy context, including siting limitations; utility-specific requirements for interconnections; state policies and programs such as renewable energy credits, rebates, and net metering; and available federal incentives, including tax credits.26
• Prioritize sites that directly serve the community and that provide one or more infrastructure and services to the community. For example, consider community centers, water and wastewater treatment facilities, police and fire stations, schools, libraries, and other facilities that could benefit from on-site renewable energy systems by lowering energy costs, and enhancing community resilience, such as providing backup power or emergency shelter in the event of a natural disaster or extended power outage (including when combined with energy storage systems, as described in Category 9).

26 Consider exploring siting resources provided by the National Renewable Energy Laborator y, such as the Clean Energy to Communities Program.

Page | 30

Category (14) Programs for Financing, Purchasing, and Installing Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy, and Zero-emission Transportation (and associated infrastructure) Measures and Capital Investments, Projects, and Programs for Leveraging Public and Private Sector Funds

STATUTORY LANGUAGE
Programs for financing energy efficiency, renewable energy, and zero-emission transportation (and associated infrastructure), capital investments, projects, and programs, which may include loan programs and performance contracting programs, for leveraging of additional public and private sector funds, and programs that allow rebates, grants, or other incentives for the purchase and installation of energy efficiency, renewable energy, and zero-emission transportation (and associated infrastructure) measures

PROGRAM GUIDANCE
• This category may include the purchase and deployment of energy efficiency, renewable energy, and zero emissions technologies. This may include technologies that promote the electrification of buildings and transportation.
• Projects and programs in this category include efforts to develop and/or implement programs that encourage and promote the use of energy efficiency, renewable energy, and zero emissions technologies. These programs may also include financing and loan programs to support energy efficiency, renewable energy, and zero emissions transportation. • Projects may leverage public and private funds, including partnerships with third-party lenders, co-lending, third-party administration of loans, loan loss reserves, and partnerships with utilities.
• Equipment acquisitions and installations for infrastructure projects will be subject to restrictions and review as outlined in statute under the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). NEPA will apply to equipment acquisition and installation, and to all other activities outlined in the Administrative and Legal Requirements Document.
• Equipment acquisitions and installations may also be subject to restrictions and review as outlined in statute under the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA). When necessary, exemptions under BABA may be possible.

EXAMPLE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES:

Transportation:
• Infrastructure development to support electric vehicles (EV), EV charging stations, rural EV infrastructure, and increasing EV charging access in underserved communities and communities with high energy burdens
• The purchase or lease of zero-emission vehicles, including electric buses, bikes, and scooters, as well as the acquisition, construction, and leasing of required supporting facilities Energy Efficient & Renewable Technology
• Pre-development planning costs for further energy efficiency and conservation projects and programs.

Page | 31

• Infrastructure improvements to support the deployment of energy efficiency measures, renewable energy, and sustainable transportation
• The purchase, deployment, and infrastructure development of energy efficient and renewable energy technologies, including projects occurring in or on non-government buildings or privately owned land and facilities.
• The purchase and deployment of a battery storage system if combined with a renewable energy generation system and/or energy efficiency at government and/or non-government buildings or facilities
• Grid modernization efforts necessary to support renewable energy and electrification initiatives, such as upgrading metering infrastructure, grid-interactive equipment and appliances, and interconnection of local renewable energy systems (e.g., community solar systems, wind turbines and other renewable energy systems)
Clean Energy Programs
• Loan programs, such as revolving loan funds, on-bill financing programs, energy savings performance contracting, or solar lending programs
• Credit enhancements, such as loan loss reserves and financial incentives, interest rate buy downs, or rebates
• Programs for public education, training, workshops, technical assistance, measurement and verification, and energy management systems to support the use of energy efficiency, renewable energy and zero emissions transportation
• Innovative deployment and financing models for renewable energy, including community solar and solarize campaigns

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES
• Blueprint 2A: Energy Efficiency – Energy Assessments and Building Upgrades • Blueprint 2B: Efficiency and Electrification of Buildings -- Energy Savings Performance Contracts • Blueprint 2C: Building Electrification Campaign
• Blueprint 3A: Solar + Storage - Power Purchase Agreements and Direct Ownership • Blueprint 3B: Community Solar
• Blueprint 3C: Solarize Campaign
• Blueprint 3D: Renewable Resource Planning
• Blueprint 4A: Electric Vehicles and Fleet Electrification • Blueprint 4B: EV Charging Infrastructure for Communities • Blueprint 5: Unlocking Sustainable Financing Solutions for Energy Projects and Programs – Revolving Loan Funds
• Blueprint 6: Workforce Development
• Additional technical assistance may be available through various DOE offices and national laboratories. For the latest, visit the EECBG Technical Assistance webpage.

Page | 32

ITEMS TO CONSIDER
• Community solar projects mitigate some of the physical and siting barriers to solar installation by enabling multiple subscriber customers to receive bill credits for electricity generated from solar power without having to host a solar installation on their property. DOE resources for community solar projects are available through the National Community Solar Partnership. • Seek opportunities to leverage EECBG Program funds with private capital or design programs to deliver ongoing energy savings by reinvesting funds from loans or energy savings (e.g., a municipal revolving loan fund or energy savings performance contracting). • Larger-scale installation projects may require extended time to go through the NEPA review and approval process. Be sure to schedule in ample time for this important process. • Entities pursuing EV charging projects under this category should consider strategies to ensure equitable distribution of EV infrastructure to disadvantaged communities. Likewise, EV charging placement would ideally align with other state and federal efforts per category 7 above.

Page | 33

LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF EECBG PROGRAM FUNDS
There are several limitations on the use of EECBG Program funds. Eligible entities must consult their award agreements for more information about those limitations.

Limitations for funds:

Local and tribal governments:
• Use up to 20 percent or $250,000, whichever is greater, of the grant funds for the establishment of revolving loan funds.
• Use up to 20 percent or $250,000, whichever is greater, of grant funds for the provision of sub- grants to nongovernmental organizations for the purpose of assistance with overseeing, establishing, and monitoring the EECBG Program activities of the applicant.

Sub-granting Requirements & Notes:
o This limitation applies only to subgrants. Sub-contracts to address specific needs of the recipient to fully implement its energy efficiency and conservation strategy are not bound by this limitation, subject to approval by DOE. However, recipients must ensure that the majority of the grant funding is used to achieve the objectives of their EECBG Program grant.
o In addition, funding that is intended to be used for implementation of measures described in the recipients EECS and / or grant award may be passed-through a support subgrantee without counting against the limitation on subgrants. o All pass-through entities are responsible for administration of sub-granted funds, including flow-down requirements (i.e., award special terms & conditions), monitoring and oversight and reporting on sub-grantee activities.
27 • Use up to 10% or $75,000 of their funds for administrative expenses (excluding the cost of the reporting requirements).
28 States and territories:
• Are required to subgrant not less than 60% of the amount provided to the State to ineligible local governments within the state.
o American Samoa, Guam, Hawaii, the Commonwealth of the Mariana Islands, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands are exempt from the 60% sub-grant requirement.
• Use up to 10% of their funds for administrative expenses.

27 Requirements for pass-through entities may be found in 2 CFR 200.332. 28 Grantees should use their established definitions of “administrative expenses”. States may not use more than 10 percent of amounts provided under the program for administrative expenses (42 USC 17155 (c)(4)). Units of local government and Indian tribes may not use more than 10 percent or $75,000, whichever is greater, for administrative expenses (42 USC 17155 (b)(3)(A)). EECBG funds may be used for compensation of employees or contractors. Whether or not the administrative cost cap applies depends on the nature of the responsibilities of the staff hired. Administrative activities are those that cannot be identified with any single program but are necessary to the general conduct of the activities of the entity organization; this could include such items as the overall direction of the organization, record keeping, budgeting, and business management.

Page | 34

Programs or Activities Using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds:

For recipients that are administering programs or activities through EECBG Program funds received under ARRA, such as financing programs, the ARRA prohibitions on use of funds still apply. Specifically, ARRA prohibits, without exception, the use of funds for any casino or other gambling establishment, aquarium, zoo, golf course, or swimming pool. Any buildings or infrastructure supporting the above establishments are also ineligible.

Questions regarding the eligibility of a specific activity, measure, or program under the EECBG Program should directed to the EECBG Program Project Officer assigned to your award.

Michael Li
Acting Deputy Director, Community Energy Programs
Office of State and Community Energy Programs
/s/ Michael Li
RFP 1008000 – City of Oakland Municipal Facility Energy Assessments

APPENDIX E
FY 25-27 Adopted CIP Budget
ADOPTED | Fiscal Year 2025 - 2027

MISSION STATEMENT
The City of Oakland is committed to the delivery of effective, courteous and responsible service. Citizens and employees are treated with fairness, dignity and respect. Civic and employee pride are accomplished through constant pursuit of excellence and a workforce that values and reflects the diversity of the Oakland community. "Oakland’s Capital Improvement Program embodies the priorities our community has championed through years of engagement with the City: equity and safety. I am deeply grateful to our community for making these critical capital investments possible through their support of Measure KK and Measure U. I also commend our dedicated City staff for their collaborative efforts across departments to ensure our resources are deployed strategically and efficiently. Together, we will continue delivering the safe streets, quality public facilities, and essential infrastructure that our community relies on every day." - Josh Rowan, Director of OakDOT and Interim Director of Oakland Public Works Introduction
The City of Oakland’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) guides the City’s decisions regarding the renovation and replacement of City-owned assets including libraries, public safety facilities, sewers, recreation centers and parks, and streets. The City develops a new CIP Budget every two years for inclusion in the overall City Budget, and the assets identified for renovation, replacement, or purchase in a budget cycle become CIP Projects.

The Fiscal Year (FY) 25-27 CIP Budget seeks to balance the need to renovate and replace existing assets with delivering new assets where they are most needed. It represents a major investment in infrastructure and assets that reflects the overall priorities of the City and has an enormous impact on the health and vibrancy of our community. The CIP links long-range strategic plans and goals with current resources and needs. Capital projects included in a CIP are defined as any long-term investment that builds, replaces or improves an asset, such as buildings, roads, parks, traffic signals, sewers and drainage lines. CIP projects typically have a useful design life of at least ten years and a minimum cost of approximately $100,000.

Policies
Several policy documents guided the overall preparation of the City’s CIP. These include (click on blue dot for link to document or page):

Capital Improvement ProgramCapital Improvement Program
Adopted | Fiscal Year 25-27Adopted | Fiscal Year 25-27
1 2023 Oakland General Plan Land Use and Transportation Element (LUTE) Update ( Resolution 89907 C.M.S.)
2022 Infrastructure Bond, Measure U (
Resolution 89314 C.M.S.)
2022 5-Year Paving Plan (
Resolution
88975 C.M.S.)
2020 Oakland Equitable Climate Action Plan (
Resolution 88267 C.M.S.)
2020 Carbon Neutrality (
Resolution 88268 C.M.S.)
2019 Infrastructure Bond, Approved CIP Projects (
Resolution 87981 C.M.S.)
2018 Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Process ( Resolution 87376 C.M.S.)
2017 Infrastructure Bond, Approved CIP Projects (
Resolution 86773 C.M.S.)
2016 Infrastructure Bond, Measure KK (
Resolution 86335 C.M.S.)
2016 Park Project Prioritization List (
Resolution 86003 C.M.S.)
2016 Racial Equity Ordinance (
14-0457, O.M.C. 2.29.170,
Resolution 13319 C.M.S.)
1998 Oakland General Plan Land Use and Transportation Element (LUTE) 1989 Public Art Ordinance (11086 C.M.S., 1989)
CIP Book Contents
CIP Prioritization Process
Development of the CIP Prioritization Process Prioritization Factors Citywide Prioritization Factors & Ranking System
Department of Race & Equity (DRE) Guidance
Past Outreach & CIP Development
Updates & Improvements to the FY 25-27 CIP Cycle
FY 25-27 CIP Cycle Framework
Alignment with the General Plan Update Phase II: Infrastructure and Facilities Element Coordination with Other City Planning Efforts
Oakland Infrastructure Bond Funding – Challenges and Opportunities CIP Highlights: Recently Completed Projects
Transportation Projects
Public Works Projects
CIP Funding Sources
CIP & Infrastructure Bonds
Internal Sources
Other Funding Sources | CIP Grant Strategy
CIP Project Types
Projects Recommended for Funding
Mandatory Projects Recommended for Funding
Unfunded Projects
Planning For The Future
Please click
here for PDF version of FY25-27 Adopted CIP Budget Book. 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE CIP PRIORITIZATION PROCESS
Like many older cities, Oakland has aging infrastructure and a significant backlog of deferred maintenance.

Key facilities such as police and fire stations, recreation facilities, libraries and parks need to be rehabilitated or replaced. With each biennial budget cycle, Oakland has more capital needs than the City has resources available to implement.

In 2016, the passage of Measure KK—a $600 million infrastructure bond funding transportation, infrastructure, and affordable housing—elevated public engagement and advocacy around capital investment in the City. In the past, only a small set of factors were considered when determining which projects moved forward and received funding. The City Council, City Administrator, and Department Directors considered several determinants, such as legal and regulatory requirements and asset conditions, along with limited funding availability to determine which CIP projects would be included in a budget cycle.

Moreover, the CIP process previously only allowed for public input during a limited number of City Council meetings and hearings.

During the FY 17-19 CIP budget process, the need for a more accessible and comprehensive approach to public input that also incorporated the mandates of the Measure KK Infrastructure Bond and racial equity became apparent. The updated CIP Development Process provided a means to receive public requests for capital projects ideas directly from communities. This update was facilitated by the formation of the Capital Improvement Program Working Group (CIPWG) comprised of Oakland Public Works (OPW), Oakland Department of Transportation (OakDOT) and Department of Race & Equity (DRE) staff. The goals of this group were as follows:
✦ Improve the quality and consistency of Departmental and public input on capital projects; ✦ Improve the transparency of the CIP prioritization/decision-making process; ✦ Ensure that the process is data-driven by identifying, applying and adhering to clear, well- defined and consistent factors;
✦ Streamline the process to improve efficiency and expenditure of staff time and resources; ✦ Filter physical and programmatic needs through the lens of community values and City goals

CITYWIDE PRIORITIZATION FACTORS AND RANKING SYSTEM
The CIPWG reviewed available existing City documents including the Mayor and Council priority documents, General Plans and Specific Plans, Council adopted plans, Departmental Strategic Plans and Measure KK Guiding Principles, along with public input to formulate nine Citywide Capital Prioritization Factors. Additionally, staff researched existing CIP processes from various cities and organizations to review best practices, challenges, lessons learned, and tools/software used to manage capital improvement programs.

CIP Prioritization
3 As detailed further in the Past Outreach and CIP Development section, the updated CIP prioritization framework, guided by values shared by community members, proposed the use of nine factors for project prioritization: 1) Equity, 2) Health & Safety, 3) Economy, 4) Environment, 5) Improvement, 6) Existing Conditions, 7) Shovel Ready, 8) Collaboration, and 9) Required Work.

CIP projects are assigned a score out of 100 points based on the weighting of the nine factors shown in the rubric below. Not only is equity considered as a standalone factor, but it is also an additional subfactor evaluated under six of the nine factors (Health & Safety, Existing Conditions, Economy, Environment, Improvement, and Collaboration).

Many City Departments are ‘asset owners’ of buildings, parks and other facilities covered by the CIP, and are thus integral partners in the CIP prioritization process. The CIPWG collaborates with Department representatives to incorporate their technical expertise into the CIP evaluation and scoring. All capital project submissions are scored and prioritized using the same equity-based scoring system.

DEPARTMENT OF RACE & EQUITY GUIDANCE
Throughout 2017-2018, the Department of Race and Equity (DRE), a City department formed in 2015 to evaluate the equity implications of city programs, provided technical assistance on various elements of the prioritization process. DRE’s involvement ensured the updated CIP incorporated equity in a manner that was meaningful and in alignment with City objectives, as well as including subsequent performance measures to assess equitable outcomes. Throughout the CIP development process, DRE was consulted to align the CIPWG mission with the following equity goals:

Eliminating systemic causes of racial disparities in City Government by supporting staff to use analytical tools to identify the impacts of systemic racism and create solutions to address it; Promoting inclusion and full participation for all residents of the City through inclusive engagement strategies that give voice to communities which are under- served as a result of disparities in services create by structural racism;
Reducing race-based disparities in our communities by using data to show how underserved communities are impacted by disparities  and how community input in those areas was used to inform and shape the prioritization factors and project recommendations for funding.

The CIP prioritization model, driven by both qualitative and quantitative data, has been recognized nationally. At the federal level, DRE was invited to present the CIP prioritization model and its results at the White House Equitable Data Roundtable on March 24, 2023. Federal agencies across the administration were represented. At this event, DRE shared how the process has helped Oakland advance racial equity through capital infrastructure investments. There were over 500 people in attendance. More recently, the model was presented to twenty different cities from across the country at the 2024 All American City Awards, where
Oakland was recognized for the CIP engagement and prioritization process for its innovation in engaging Oakland communities in the CIP process strengthening democratic participation 4 and inclusive engagement in City affairs earning Oakland the Title of one of the best ten cities  in the country in these areas.

During the development of the proposed FY 25-27 CIP, DRE continued its active participation in the CIPWG and CIP community engagement framework strategy. Further information on the FY25-27 CIP process is detailed later in this narrative.

PAST OUTREACH AND CIP DEVELOPMENT
In 2018, as part of the City’s commitment to inclusive community engagement, the CIPWG dedicated a Community Outreach Coordinator to work closely with and support fostering relationship building as well as encouraging public involvement. During the FY 19-21 budget cycle, the CIPWG implemented public outreach in two phases. In Phase 1, through a series of community meetings, and online and paper surveys, the City gathered community input on how to develop a CIP process, rooted in shared City and community values and priorities.

The information collected in Phase 1 was used to develop a weighting system for the nine prioritization factors, which based on a scoring scale from zero to one hundred, resulted in also uplifting the voices of Black and Hispanic or Latino/a/e participants. This step was intentional and necessary given that the data collected through outreach events revealed that Black and Hispanic or Latino/a/e participation was not representative of Oakland demographics. This was addressed by statistically weighting the responses on the evaluation factors of these ethnic groups. A key outcome of this step was equity rising to the top as one of the most valued factors by Oaklanders, followed by health and safety.

Phase 2 utilized the adopted factors and weighting system to develop the CIP Budget, while continuing community engagement to initiate a first-of-its-kind path forward for the public to request their own capital project ideas. Public intake forms were distributed and received through the City’s website, email, standard mail, and in community meetings. The public form included five simplified questions about CIP Project requests, and was translated into Vietnamese, Chinese and Spanish. In subsequent engagement cycles, Arabic, Khmer, Korean, and Tagalog were added to the
public intake form.

With every CIP cycle, the community outreach and engagement process has evolved. Throughout the prior three CIP cycles (FY 19-21, FY 21-23, FY 23-25), the City has collaborated with community-based organizations (CBOs) to help facilitate the development of CIP proposals and have informed the City of community member priorities. This FY 25-27 budget cycle represents the fourth cycle of implementing the adopted CIP prioritization weighting system, providing a framework for a robust project ranking process that is heavily weighted toward equity, to develop recommendations for funding allocations. 5 The City’s CIP process allows for flexibility to continually improve and adapt to change. This section will provide an overview of the FY 25-27 CIP cycle.

FY 25-27 CIP CYCLE FRAMEWORK
Leading up to this CIP cycle, staff from the CIPWG, General Plan Update Team, and Department of Finance jointly developed the City’s FY 25-27 CIP framework based on these guiding goals:

Support a transparent and equitable process that builds on engagement and equity work performed to date
Encourage further community participation where it can meaningfully inform City policy and investment decisions
Reduce redundant processes across different city efforts Set appropriate expectations for the City’s financial realities.

These goals synthesized lessons learned and feedback from Community-Based Organizations (including the City’s CIP Community Consultants) as well as the City’s current fiscal capacity. Feedback received on the CIP process has reflected public process fatigue. CIP Community Consultants have previously raised that community members often feel tapped out or confused about how CIP engagement connects with other City planning processes, which is exacerbated by rigid budget timelines and relatively short duration over which CIP engagement has historically taken place. Moreover, the CIPWG learned from Community Consultants that developing a capital project proposal is a heavy lift for community members, who may not have expertise on specific types of asset improvements, let alone the time or resources to provide this level of input. In response to this input, the CIPWG made the decision to temporarily pause the solicitation of new capital project ideas and is considering different community engagement models for future CIP cycles.

Given past community feedback and the City’s limited financial capacity, the FY 25-27 CIP framework is focused on delivering and funding the City’s existing priority list of more than 100 in-progress projects. This approach allows the City to prioritize existing grant-funded and “shovel ready” projects that can move forward expeditiously to maximize project delivery within budget constraints.

Alignment With The General Plan Update Phase II:  Infrastructure And Facilities Element In alignment with the FY25-27 CIP framework, the City partnered with the General Plan Update Team to align the CIP process with the planning and community engagement process for the 2045 General Plan
Update Infrastructure and Capital Facilities Element (or topic), which is a longer-term capital planning process over a twenty-year time horizon.

Oakland’s General Plan Update (GPU) is a collaborative citywide planning process to plan for a vibrant future for all residents. Through this process, the City will create the roadmap to more livable and connected Updates & Improvements for FY 25-27
6 neighborhoods where community members can access what they want and need, like grocery stores, arts and entertainment, retail, libraries, parks, and safe and reliable transportation.

Phase 1 of the General Plan Update (GPU) concluded in October 2023 with the adoption of the Housing, Safety and Environmental Justice Elements. GPU Phase 2 will include Oakland’s first ever Infrastructure and Facilities Element, addressing the policy framework to support and guide the City’s capital planning over a twenty-year time horizon.

The GPU team initiated Phase 2 in Fall 2024 including: a virtual town hall on September 26, 2024, in-person pop-up event tabling, and a survey open through October 20, 2024 to share community input on a full range of topics shaping the physical layout of the City.

The GPU Phase 2, which will continue through October 2026, is a well-timed opportunity for the City and Oakland community members to build upon past CIP cycles and contribute to a longer-range approach to capital planning. The resulting new General Plan Element will provide the policy framework to support and guide the City’s CIP planning process going forward, including providing a more systematic approach to project prioritization that incorporates the existing “unfunded” list. Once Phase 2 of the General Plan Update (GPU) is adopted in 2026, the updated General Plan will guide citywide development over the following two decades, with a focus on creating an equitable and just city.

Coordination With Other City Planning Efforts
Leading up to the FY 25-27 CIP cycle, OakDOT conducted a review of transportation project recommendations from adopted City planning documents from the past five years to ensure that these plans are more closely integrated within the CIP. Staff held a series of internal workshops and stakeholder outreach, vetting projects based on the following factors:

Equity Priority Neighborhoods
Overlap with the 2024 High Injury Network
Level of community support based on past public engagement Coordination with existing CIP projects
Project readiness and feasibility
After completing this review process, staff finalized a list of 20 projects originating from recommendations from the
Downtown Specific Plan,
Chinatown Complete Streets Plan,
East Oakland Neighborhood
Initiative,
East Oakland Mobility Action Plan,
Grand Avenue Mobility Plan, and
Transit Action Strategy.

This list of 20 projects was subsequently scored and evaluated based on the nine prioritization factors described under the CIP Prioritization Process, resulting in each project being assigned a CIP score out of 100 points. CIP scores also underwent a normalization process for consistency across the past four cycles.

After the ranking process was completed, all projects were run through a funding availability analysis.

Through this review and ranking process, projects were sorted into four categories:

Recommended for Funding: highly ranked CIP projects and existing grant-funded projects that are recommended to be funded in the FY 25-27 CIP
Existing CIP: project ideas that are already captured by an existing CIP project or process Unfunded: project ideas that are not recommended for funded in the FY 25-27 due to lack of available funding and/or because they received a low ranking CIP score Non CIP: project ideas that are not categorized as capital projects (i.e., maintenance, projects outside of the City’s jurisdiction, etc.)
The City aims to fund as many projects as it can for which funding is available and can be delivered using available resources. The projects included in the CIP reflect these policies and the constraints of existing funding sources. They also place a priority on preserving the City’s significant investment in existing infrastructure assets.
7 Oakland Infrastructure Bond Funding - Challenges And Opportunities Both OakDOT and OPW rely on infrastructure bonds—including Measure DD, Measure KK, and Measure U— to deliver the City’s CIP. Bond funding also boosts the City’s competitiveness for external regional, state, and federal grants by providing a funding source for local match commitments.

As of spring 2025, OakDOT has spent and encumbered more than 95% of the $350 million available for transportation Measure KK. Measure U, Measure KK’s successor, included $290 million for transportation, but OakDOT has not received any Measure U funds to date. Under the FY 23-25 CIP, work supporting the 5YP implementation was originally funded by Measure KK and Measure U. The FY 25 budget for Measure U for Transportation was originally established at $55.1 million, with street resurfacing as its largest component at $51.75M. This budget was then reduced to $0 as part of the FY25 contingency budget that went into effect in October 2024.

Following these reductions, OakDOT, Finance, and the City Administrators Office took various administrative actions in Fall 2024 to minimize impacts to the paving program. These included reallocating $5M in funds from OakDOT projects with excess near-term cash, reallocating $12.7M in Measure KK funds from Oakland Public Works CIP projects with excess near-term cash, and seeking Council Approval to appropriate $3M in Measure BB Fund Balance towards the paving program. These measures allowed key paving contracts to proceed. However, there is no available funding for further administrative actions. As a result, as of January 2025 all pending paving projects have been deferred until a bond sale is completed.

As of the development of the proposed CIP budget in spring 2025, the timing of the next bond sale has yet to be determined. Without a new bond sale of Measure U, OakDOT cannot initiate new contract paving projects and is in danger of delaying grant-funded, shovel-ready streetscape projects. If the Measure U bond issuance is delayed, construction cost escalation will generate significant additional costs for planned capital projects. From 2021-2025, the State of California Department of General Services’ “ California Construction
Cost Index” estimated that construction costs inflated by an average of 8.7% annually. While inflation fell in 2024, tariff-related uncertainty poses a severe threat to construction costs The City Administrator’s Office and Finance Department are actively working to ensure that the City is able to issue bonds in FY26 to avoid negative financial and operational impacts. In order to successfully sell bonds the City must demonstrate: stable governance and management, improved immediate financial position, and that it has a plan for sustained improvement in finances and reserves; in addition to completing the required legal disclosures and operational steps.

Finally, the City’s project delivery functions continue to face two main challenges: hiring and procurement.

Some divisions responsible for project delivery have a vacancy rate exceeding 50%, limiting the number of projects that can move forward and slowing down the projects that remain. In addition, cumbersome procurement processes overlaid with strict local business requirements result in bidding processes that are longer than desired.
8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
This page shows examples of recently completed capital projects in Oakland . Please click on the images below for links to the respective project websites.

West Street Road Diet Lakeside Green Street LAMMPS Phase 1 Completed CIP Projects
9 Telegraph Avenue Corridor
Improvements (KONO)
Crossing To Safety (Park
Boulevard/E38th Street)
8th Street West Oakland Traffic
Calming
OakDOT Paving Plan
In Fiscal Year 2023-24, OakDOT paved a record high of 47 miles of streets. For more information, please visit:
www.oaklandca.gov/news/safer-smoother-streets-in-oakland-as-city-repaves-record-high-of-47-miles.

Main Library Improvements Downtown Oakland Senior Center Improvements
Mini Parks Beautification Projects
10 Holly Mini Park Large Trash Capture Devices At
Cary Ave & Mandela Pkwy
Fox Theater HVAC Controls
Replacement
11 CIP & INFRASTRUCTURE BONDS
On July 11, 2022, the Oakland City Council adopted Resolution No. 89314 C.M.S, which placed the 2022 Affordable Housing Infrastructure Bond Measure on the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election ballot. On December 20, 2022, the Oakland City Council adopted Resolution No. 89543 C.M.S, which certified the election results from the November 8, 2022, specifically the approval of the 2022 Affordable Housing & Infrastructure Bond Measure (Measure U).

Measure U Bond proceeds improve public safety and invest in Oakland by creating affordable housing for Oaklanders, increasing housing for homeless Oaklanders, repaving streets to remove potholes, improving traffic/pedestrian safety, and updating fire stations and other public facilities.

CIP FUNDING SOURCES
There are limited sources of internal funding available for capital improvements, typically with restrictions on their use within broad categories, which are described below. For this reason, outside grants are a significant source of funding for capital projects and are typically needed to advance major capital investments.

INTERNAL SOURCES
Capital Improvement Impact Fee (Fund 2421) Limited to funding capital improvements within the City’s Capital Improvement Program that supports fire, police, library, parks and recreation, or storm drain services to improve or expand the City’s public facilities to accommodate service demands from new development.

The funds may not be used for rehabilitation, maintenance or operating costs.

Measure BB - Bicycle and Pedestrian (Fund 2219) Limited to funding bicycle and pedestrian safety and accessibility improvements within the public right-of-way.  Funded through the additional half- cent sales tax passed in November 2014.

Measure BB – Local Streets and Roads (Fund 2218) Limited to funding improvements and maintenance of local streets and roads, sidewalks, traffic safety and related work within the public right-of-way. Funded through the additional half-cent sales tax passed in November 2014.

Measure F – Vehicle Registration Fee (Fund 2215) Limited to funding maintenance of local streets and roads, relieve congestion, improve traffic signal and commuter information technology systems, and improve bicycle and pedestrian travel.

Measure DD - 2002 Oakland Trust for Clean Water and Safe Parks (Fund 5322/532X) Limited to clean water, parks and open space.

CIP Funding Sources
12 Measure HH – 2017 Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Distribution Tax (Fund 1030) Limited to funding projects and programs that: reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages; and that support health education and physical activity programs to improve the health of Oakland residents, especially for those most impacted by health disparities and the chronic diseases associated with the consumption of sugar.

Measure KK – Infrastructure I-Bond (Fund 5330/5332/5335/5337/5338) Limited to funding streets and sidewalk repairs, city facilities, parks and open space, and affordable housing.

Measure Q – Parks & Recreation Preservation, Litter Reduction and Homeless Measure (Fund 2244) Limited to funding local water quality improvements that clean storm systems and park creeks.

Measure U – 2022 Affordable Housing and Infrastructure Bond (Fund 5340/5342) Measure to improve public safety and invest in Oakland by creating affordable housing for Oaklanders, increasing housing for homeless Oaklanders, repaving streets to remove potholes, improving traffic/pedestrian safety, and updating fire stations and other public facilities, by issuing $850,000,000 in general obligation bonds, raising approximately $85,000,000, passed in November 2022.

State of California Gas Tax (Fund 2230) Limited to funding basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads system.

State of California Gas Tax – SB1 Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation Account (Fund 2232) Funded through 2017 Senate Bill (SB) 1 to address deferred maintenance on the State Highway System and local streets and roads.  Similar to Fund 2230, this fund is limited to funding basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads system.

Transportation Impact Fee (Fund 2420) Funds improvements and expansion to the citywide transportation infrastructure to address and manage additional travel demand from new development for all travel modes.

The funds may not be used for rehabilitation, maintenance, or operating costs.

OTHER FUNDING SOURCES | CIP GRANT STRATEGY
Oakland receives a significant amount of funding from sources outside the biennially adopted CIP. While by their nature, these grants are only available for specific projects and purposes, and are often cyclical and competitive, they represent a significant addition to local funds. Grants are the most viable source to fund new improvements and allow internal funds to be kept available for existing assets. Internal funds are also necessary for leverage and grant matching fund requirements.

The CIP prioritization process is integral to the City's grant pursuit strategy. CIP scores serve as the foundation for identifying priority projects for new funding opportunities. However, since the vast majority of grant sources are competitive, the City must filter its capital needs through the lens of funding criteria set by grantors. By striking a balance between prioritizing the highest-ranked CIP projects and advancing the most competitive CIP projects for different grant opportunities, the City is able to maximize its competitiveness for grant awards. OakDOT's grant strategy first prioritizes partially funded projects already included in the CIP, followed by high scoring, unfunded CIP projects; in doing so, OakDOT seeks to fill funding gaps for in- progress projects while also identifying grant opportunities for new CIP projects that are both highly ranked and well-aligned with grant criteria.

The City continues to aggressively seek grants for a wide variety of needs to meet the City’s need to address unfunded priorities. Over the past five years, the City has secured over $300 million in competitive grants to implement the CIP. In 2024 alone, OakDOT submitted 23 grant applications for capital funding. 13 The adopted CIP is divided into projects recommended for funding, mandatory projects recommended for funding, and unfunded projects. Each is described in more detail below.

PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING
This category includes high scoring projects, grouped by program or asset category, and ranked by their score based on the adopted policies referenced above. It also includes current CIP projects that have partial funding available and were included in the adopted CIPs in fiscal years 2015-17 through 2023-25 budgets.

Because of limited new funding, existing projects in need of funding to complete construction have been prioritized for this budget cycle.

MANDATORY PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING
These are projects mandated by court order or other legislation (e.g., sanitary sewer capital improvements; construction of curb ramps, bridge rehabilitation, emergency roadway rehabilitation, etc.) or projects that require local match from grants previously received and approved by the City Council.

UNFUNDED PROJECTS
This category includes all other requests for capital projects for which a funding source is not presently known. This includes projects that replace or renovate assets that are either structurally or functionally obsolete or have deferred maintenance issues that negatively value the asset, for which no funding is available such as:

Major projects that improve or replace key assets: Examples include emergency services facilities such as the Police Administration Building and some fire stations that do not meet the mandate of essential service facilities (fully operational after an earthquake or similar disaster) or have significant deferred maintenance items that impact their operational status. Additionally, many older City owned buildings, such as the Main Library, have surpassed their operational life expectancy.

Minor Capital Improvements which would fund renovations or replacement of assets that are not planned, but are of an urgent nature, have been minimally funded through the previous Operating Budget at $1 million annually. These include urgent projects such as roof reconstruction and replacement; hot water heater, chiller and boiler replacement; appliance replacement; mold, asbestos and lead paint abatement; HVAC major renovation and/or replacement; electrical panel upgrades; sewer line/lateral replacements.

Critically unfunded are projects with no available funding that are described by departments as urgent.

Examples include fire station facility improvements, parks and recreation restroom and facility renovations, CIP Project Types
14 storm drainage system improvements, and water quality/trash capture projects are required to meet various regulations and requirements. Other types of projects include elevator upgrades, implementation of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan, and the renovation of pool facilities and locker rooms.

While no funding source has been identified, these projects are presented for consideration should funding become available.

Requests from Prior Years: The CIP unfunded list documents outstanding capital project requests from past adopted CIPs.
15 Citywide long-term capital project planning is required for the ongoing management of Oakland’s complete inventory of assets. Many of our assets have reached the end of their useful life and need replacement. Others have historic value or other intrinsic value to the community that should be considered for preservation. The adopted CIP Budget includes funding for a small portion of the City’s asset renovation or replacement needs and reflects the limits of existing fund sources.

Due to limited funding, a strategic approach to prioritizing remaining unmet needs is essential. A careful assessment of core City programs and services and the assets and facilities needed to support those services is required to inform a strategic approach. Comprehensive physical condition assessments of City assets are required to develop preliminary project scopes and to determine budget need. These assessments would in turn inform a long-term funding strategy to address those assets considered critical to core functions and future growth, which could include future General Obligation Bond(s) or other revenue measures. Comprehensive assessment and inventory of City facilities will also inform planning for adequate operations and maintenance budgets and funding mechanisms. The effort to implement a comprehensive, strategic, and sustainable approach to capital planning is a citywide endeavor that spans Departments and budget cycles. Following are a few of the initiatives underway to help meet these long-term goals:

Citywide Facilities Energy & Building Code Compliance Assessments and Improvements – The FY25-27 CIP Budget includes requests to fund two projects that will conduct Citywide Facilities assessments, identify critical improvements required to comply with energy & building code, and provide preliminary cost estimation and prioritization for implementation. Highest priority improvements will proceed with design, permitting and construction as funding allows, and future funding needs will be identified to inform capital improvement program planning.

The Equitable Climate Action Plan (ECAP) establishes the City’s comprehensive policies to address climate change, including Action Item A-1: Fund Creation and Operation of Resilience Hubs. Resilience Hubs are facilities designated to serve broad community needs related to the shocks and stresses resulting from a changing climate. These needs include physical and operational design features like solar energy systems, energy storage, advanced HVAC, green infrastructure, and charging systems for medical equipment and emergency response supplies. Resilience Hubs will become a core part of the City’s emergency response capabilities, as well as serving needs during smoke days, extreme heat events, power outages, and natural disasters. The CIP includes costs associated with the creation of Resilience Hubs at municipal buildings across Oakland.

Oakland’s General Plan Update (GPU) is a collaborative citywide planning process to plan for a vibrant future for all residents (see Updates & Improvements for FY
25-27 section for additional detail).

Future goals include development of a comprehensive asset management system to provide key data and information on all City owned assets to inform maintenance and investment strategies that optimize asset maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement over time.

Building an effective and efficient Capital Improvement Program will require multiple process improvements over time. It is essential that Oaklanders have a high level of confidence that City infrastructure projects will be completed in a timely and professional manner. City staff and leadership continue to seek and implement ways to improve effectiveness and efficiency.

Planning for the Future
16 17

ADOPTED PROJECTS BY CATEGORY
Updated On 27 Aug, 2025
Back Reset
Broken down by
Category
SearchSearch in table Showing 96 rows
 
Visualization

2025-26 2026-27
0 50M
100M
150M
200M
250M
Transportation
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Buildings & Facilities
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Parks & Open Spaces
Sort Large to Small 
         
Download  Help  Share 
Transportation
Projects in this category include street paving and rehabilitation, streetscape projects, sidewalk repair, curb ramp construction, bridge repair, traffic calming, safe routes to schools, pedestrian safety, bicycle improvements, and traffic signals and operations. These programs are designed to address the maintenance backlog of City streets and sidewalks and to improve the safety of all modes of travel, including people walking, biking, driving and taking transit.

Category Project Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal Year
Council
District Location
Transportation Bike Plan
Implementation Transportation
2218 - Measure
BB Local
Streets &
Roads
550,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Financial Summaries
18 Category Project Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal Year
Council
District Location
Transportation Bridge
Rehabilitation Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
2215 - Vehicle
Registration
Funds
62,765 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
2218 - Measure
BB Local
Streets &
Roads
9,470,406 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
2219 - Measure
BB Bicycle &
Pedestrian
186,557 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation 2230 - State
Gas Tax 388,313 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
2232 - State
Gas Tax SB1
RMRA
3,131,490 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
50,500,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Citywide Street
Resurfacing (In-
House
Materials)
Transportation
2232 - State
Gas Tax SB1
RMRA
1,500,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Community
Transportation
Plans & Project
Development
Transportation
2218 - Measure
BB Local
Streets &
Roads
750,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation 2230 - State
Gas Tax 1,888,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation
2232 - State
Gas Tax SB1
RMRA
1,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation
2420 -
Transportation
Impact Fee
1,912,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation
2420 -
Transportation
Impact Fee
750,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
13,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Curb Ramps Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
9,500,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Emergency
Roadway
Reconstruction
Transportation
2232 - State
Gas Tax SB1
RMRA
1,000,000 2026
Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Emergency
Roadway
Reconstruction
Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
3,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Pedestrian Plan
Implementation Transportation
2218 - Measure
BB Local
Streets &
Roads
250,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Pedestrian Plan
Implementation Transportation
2219 - Measure
BB Bicycle &
Pedestrian
300,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Sidewalk
Reconstruction Transportation
2232 - State
Gas Tax SB1
RMRA
3,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Speed Bump
Program Transportation
2232 - State
Gas Tax SB1
RMRA
750,450 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Traffic Safety
Program Transportation
2218 - Measure
BB Local
Streets &
Roads
1,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Traffic Signal
Capital Program Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,500,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Transportation
Grant Matching Transportation
2215 - Vehicle
Registration
Funds
900,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Bridge
Rehabilitation Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
2215 - Vehicle
Registration
Funds
51,720 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
52,000,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
19 Category Project Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal Year
Council
District Location
Transportation
Community
Transportation
Plans & Project
Development
Transportation
2218 - Measure
BB Local
Streets &
Roads
750,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation
2420 -
Transportation
Impact Fee
3,470,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
12,250,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Curb Ramps Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
9,500,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Emergency
Roadway
Reconstruction
Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Safe Routes to
Schools Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Speed Bump
Program Transportation
2232 - State
Gas Tax SB1
RMRA
726,872 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Traffic Signal
Capital Program Transportation
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
191,538,573
Buildings And Facilities
Projects in this category include new construction, expansion, and replacement or improvement of recreation centers, fire stations, community centers, and other City buildings, facilities, and structures.

Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Buildings & Facilities
Brookdale
Recreation
Center
Expansion &
Park
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
3,000,000 2026 5 2535 High
Street
Buildings & Facilities
East Oakland
Senior Center
Renovation
Human Services
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2026 7
9255
Edes
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Museum
Collection
Center
Seismic
Improvement
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,999,885 2026 3 1000 Oak
Street
Buildings & Facilities Museum
Improvements Public Works
1010 -
General
Purpose
Fund
319,268 2026 3 1000 Oak
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Oakland Ice
Center
Refrigeration
Equipment
Economic
Workforce
Development
5343 -
Measure
U
(Taxable)
10,000,000 2026 3 519 18th
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Oakland Tool
Lending
Library at
Temescal
Library
Library
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2026 1
5205
Telegraph
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Arroyo Viejo
Center
Recreation
Master Plan
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 6
7701
Krause
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Brookdale
Recreation
Center
Expansion &
Park
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,600,000 2027 5 2535 High
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Citywide
Facilities
Energy &
Building Code
Compliance
Improvements
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Buildings & Facilities
Citywide Fire
Station Energy
& Building
Code
Compliance
Improvements
Fire
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
20 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Buildings & Facilities
Fire Station 29
& TREC
Training
Facility
Fire
5338 -
Measure
KK
12,720,500 2027 6 1016 66th
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Fire Station 29
& TREC
Training
Facility
Fire
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
22,279,500 2027 6 1016 66th
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities Fox Theatre
Improvements
Economic
Workforce
Development
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
4,600,000 2027 3
1807
Telegraph
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Library Energy
Assessments
& Upgrades to
MLK Jr.,
Golden Gate,
Temescal &
Lakeview
Branch
Libraries
Library
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Buildings & Facilities Malonga
Center
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 3 1428 Alice
Street
Buildings & Facilities Museum
Improvements Public Works
1010 -
General
Purpose
Fund
326,930 2027 3 1000 Oak
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Tassafaronga
Recreation
Center
Upgrades
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 7 975 85th
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
West Oakland
Resilience
Hub
Library, Parks &
Recreation,
Human Services
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 3
1801
Adeline
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Willie Keyes
Recreation
Center
Parks &
Recreation/Library
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 3
3131
Union
Street
73,346,083
Parks And Open Spaces
Projects in this category include improvements to playgrounds and tot lots, park and recreation facilities, sports fields, and City swimming pools; and improvements to Oakland’s waterways.

Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Parks & Open Spaces
10th & 12th
Street
Remediation
at Peralta Park
Parks &
Recreation
532X -
Measure
DD
750,000 2026 2 10th & 12th
Street
Parks & Open Spaces
Caldecott
Trailhead
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,850,000 2026 4 6900
Broadway
Parks & Open Spaces
Lake Merritt
Channel Trail
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
532X -
Measure
DD
3,250,000 2026 3 Lake Merritt
Parks & Open Spaces San Antonio
Park
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,850,000 2026 2 1701 E19th
Street
Parks & Open Spaces Estuary Park Parks &
Recreation
532X -
Measure
DD
6,000,000 2027 5 5
Embarcadero
14,700,000
Sanitary Sewer & Wastewater
Projects in this category primarily include reconstruction of sewer mains throughout the City as required by an Administrative Order issued to Oakland and other Bay Area communities by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the State of California. The Order requires the City to plan and implement capital repairs and replacements to the aging sewer facilities and implement maintenance 21 practices that prevent sewage discharges into creeks, lakes, and the San Francisco Bay. Funding for emergency repair and replacement of sewer facilities is also included Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Emergency
Sewer
Repairs
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
2,000,000 2026 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater Hotspot
Sewer Repair
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
3,000,000 2026 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Root
Foaming
FY25-27
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
600,000 2026 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
56-02
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
2,950,000 2026 5 Sausal Creek
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
60-03/07
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
4,680,000 2026 2 Rancho San
Antonio
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
81-002
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
4,070,858 2026 5
High Street
and
International
Blvd.

Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-004
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
1,150,000 2026 6 Arroyo Viejo
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-101
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
7,390,000 2026 6 Coliseum &
Hegenberger
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-102
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
6,820,000 2026 6 Coliseum &
Hegenberger
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-211
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
1,700,000 2026 7 Webster
Street
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-231
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
3,575,000 2026 7
Sheffield
Village -
Marlowe
Drive
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Emergency
Sewer
Repairs
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
2,060,000 2027 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater Hotspot
Sewer Repair
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
3,090,000 2027 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Root
Foaming
FY25-27
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
618,000 2027 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
56-02
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
13,600,000 2027 5 Sausal Creek
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
62-02
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
1,080,000 2027
5 North
Kennedy
Tract
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
80-001
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
570,000 2027 5 St. Elizabeth
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
81-001
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
570,000 2027 5 Fruitvale
Station
22 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
83-201
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
370,000 2027 6 Seminary
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-004
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
6,800,000 2027 6 Arroyo Viejo
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-102
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
820,000 2027 7 North
Stonehurst
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-211
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
6,800,000 2027 7 Webster
Street
74,313,858
Storm Drainage And Watershed
Projects in this category primarily include reconstruction of failing storm drain facilities and implementation of projects that protect and improve watersheds throughout the City such as creek restoration, green infrastructure, and other stormwater pollution prevention projects to meet water quality regulations. Funding for emergency repair and replacement of storm drain facilities is also included.

Category Project Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal Year
Council
District Location
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Beaconsfield
Canyon Storm
Drain Inlet
Replacement
& Creek
Enhancement
Public
Works
2244 -
Measure Q 109,375 2026 4 Beaconsfield
Canyon Park
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Chelsea Drive
at Longcroft
Storm Drain
Inlet
Improvement
Public
Works
2244 -
Measure Q 190,497 2026 4
SD Inlet on
Chelsea
Drive at
Longcroft
Drive
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Empire Road
Storm Drain
Improvement
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,443,750 2026 7
Empire
Road
between
Cairo Rd &
Tunis Rd
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Glen Echo
Creek
Restoration
Public
Works
532X -
Measure DD 485,188 2026 7
Croxton
Avenue &
Richmond
Blvd.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
High Street
Storm
Drainage
Improvements
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,113,281 2026 5 & 6
High Street
between
Wattling St.
and
Tidewater
Ave
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Richmond
Blvd. Culvert
Repair
Public
Works
2244 -
Measure Q 240,198 2026 3
3021
Richmond
Blvd.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
Stormwater
Capital
Improvements
Public
Works
2421 - Capital
Improvements
Impact Fee
Fund
1,435,896 2026 Citywide Various
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Bernhardt
Drive Storm
Drainage
Improvement
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
2,062,500 2027 7
Bernhardt
Dr. from
Ghormley
Avenue to
Union
Pacific
Railroad
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Broken Weirs
Replacement
- 73rd and
International
Large Trash
Capture
Device
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,729,021 2027 6
73rd Ave &
International
Blvd.
23 Category Project Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal Year
Council
District Location
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Citywide
Storm
Drainage
Replacement
(eg. Joaquin
Miller Park
Storm Drain,
Moraga Ave
and Masonic
Ave Storm
Drain)
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Storm Drainage & Watershed
High Street
Storm
Drainage
Improvements
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
4,687,500 2027 5 & 6
High Street
between
Wattling St.
and
Tidewater
Ave
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Rehab Storm
Drain under
International
Blvd. between
57th and 62nd
Avenues
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
351,563 2027 6
Under
International
Blvd from
57th to 62nd
Avenues.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
Richmond
Blvd. Culvert
Repair
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
4,700,000 2027 3
3021
Richmond
Blvd.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
Stormwater
Capital
Improvements
Public
Works
2421 - Capital
Improvements
Impact Fee
Fund
2,205,613 2027 Citywide Various
21,754,382

PROJECTS BY FUND
Please click on the link for
Projects by Fund.

HTTPS://WWW.OAKLANDCA.GOV/TOPICS/CAPITAL-IMPROVEMENT-PROGRAM contact us at: [email protected]
24 ADOPTED PROJECTS BY FUND
Updated On 27 Aug, 2025
Back Reset
Broken down by
Fund Number
SearchSearch in table Showing 96 rows
 
Visualization

2025-26 2026-27
0 50M
100M
150M
200M
250M
5342 - Measure U (T ax Exe…
3100 - Sewer Service Fund
2218 - Measure BB Local St…
5338 - Measure KK
2232 - State Gas T ax SB1 R…
532X - Measure DD
5343 - Measure U (T axable)
Sort Large to Small 
         
Download  Help  Share 
Fund 1010 - General Purpose Fund
Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Buildings & Facilities Museum
Improvements
Public
Works
1010 -
General
Purpose
Fund
319,268 2026 3 1000 Oak
Street
Buildings & Facilities Museum
Improvements
Public
Works
1010 -
General
Purpose
Fund
326,930 2027 3 1000 Oak
Street
646,198
Fund 2215 - Measure F - Vehicle Registration Fee
Financial SummariesFinancial Summaries
25 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Transportation
Citywide
Street
Resurfacing
Transportation
2215 -
Vehicle
Registration
Funds
62,765 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Transportation
Grant
Matching
Transportation
2215 -
Vehicle
Registration
Funds
900,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Citywide
Street
Resurfacing
Transportation
2215 -
Vehicle
Registration
Funds
51,720 2027 Citywide Citywide
1,014,485
Fund 2218 - Measure BB - Local Streets & Roads
Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Transportation Bike Plan
Implementation Transportation
2218 -
Measure
BB
Local
Streets
& Roads
550,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
2218 -
Measure
BB
Local
Streets
& Roads
9,470,406 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Community
Transportation
Plans & Project
Development
Transportation
2218 -
Measure
BB
Local
Streets
& Roads
750,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Pedestrian Plan
Implementation Transportation
2218 -
Measure
BB
Local
Streets
& Roads
250,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Traffic Safety
Program Transportation
2218 -
Measure
BB
Local
Streets
& Roads
1,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Community
Transportation
Plans & Project
Development
Transportation
2218 -
Measure
BB
Local
Streets
& Roads
750,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
12,770,406
Fund 2219 - Measure BB - Bike & Pedestrian
Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
2219 -
Measure
BB Bicycle
&
Pedestrian
186,557 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Pedestrian Plan
Implementation Transportation
2219 -
Measure
BB Bicycle
&
Pedestrian
300,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
486,557
Fund 2230 - State Gas Tax
Category Project
Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Transportation
Citywide
Street
Resurfacing
Transportation
2230 -
State
Gas Tax
388,313 2026 Citywide Citywide
26 Category Project
Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Transportation
Complete
Streets
Capital
Transportation
2230 -
State
Gas Tax
1,888,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
2,276,313
Fund 2232 - Gas Tax RMRA
Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
2232 -
State
Gas Tax
SB1
RMRA
3,131,490 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Citywide Street
Resurfacing
(In-House
Materials)
Transportation
2232 -
State
Gas Tax
SB1
RMRA
1,500,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation
2232 -
State
Gas Tax
SB1
RMRA
1,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Emergency
Roadway
Reconstruction
Transportation
2232 -
State
Gas Tax
SB1
RMRA
1,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Sidewalk
Reconstruction Transportation
2232 -
State
Gas Tax
SB1
RMRA
3,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Speed Bump
Program Transportation
2232 -
State
Gas Tax
SB1
RMRA
750,450 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Speed Bump
Program Transportation
2232 -
State
Gas Tax
SB1
RMRA
726,872 2027 Citywide Citywide
11,108,812
Fund 2244 - Measure Q - Parks & Recreation
Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Beaconsfield
Canyon Storm
Drain Inlet
Replacement
& Creek
Enhancement
Public
Works
2244 -
Measure
Q
109,375 2026 4 Beaconsfield
Canyon Park
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Chelsea Drive
at Longcroft
Storm Drain
Inlet
Improvement
Public
Works
2244 -
Measure
Q
190,497 2026 4
SD Inlet on
Chelsea
Drive at
Longcroft
Drive
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Richmond
Blvd. Culvert
Repair
Public
Works
2244 -
Measure
Q
240,198 2026 3
3021
Richmond
Blvd.
540,070
Fund 2420 - Transportation Impact Fee
Category Project
Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Transportation
Complete
Streets
Capital
Transportation
2420 -
Transportation
Impact Fee
1,912,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Complete
Streets
Capital
Transportation
2420 -
Transportation
Impact Fee
750,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
27 Category Project
Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Transportation
Complete
Streets
Capital
Transportation
2420 -
Transportation
Impact Fee
3,470,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
6,132,000
Fund 2421- Capital Improvements Impact Fee Fund
Category Project Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal Year
Council
District Location
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Stormwater
Capital
Improvements
Public
Works
2421 - Capital
Improvements
Impact Fee
Fund
1,435,896 2026 Citywide Various
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Stormwater
Capital
Improvements
Public
Works
2421 - Capital
Improvements
Impact Fee
Fund
2,205,613 2027 Citywide Various
3,641,509
Fund 3100 - Sewer Service Fund
Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Emergency
Sewer
Repairs
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
2,000,000 2026 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater Hotspot
Sewer Repair
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
3,000,000 2026 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Root
Foaming
FY25-27
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
600,000 2026 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
56-02
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
2,950,000 2026 5 Sausal Creek
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
60-03/07
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
4,680,000 2026 2 Rancho San
Antonio
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
81-002
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
4,070,858 2026 5
High Street
and
International
Blvd.

Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-004
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
1,150,000 2026 6 Arroyo Viejo
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-101
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
7,390,000 2026 6 Coliseum &
Hegenberger
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-102
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
6,820,000 2026 6 Coliseum &
Hegenberger
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-211
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
1,700,000 2026 7 Webster
Street
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-231
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
3,575,000 2026 7
Sheffield
Village -
Marlowe
Drive
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Emergency
Sewer
Repairs
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
2,060,000 2027 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater Hotspot
Sewer Repair
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
3,090,000 2027 Citywide Various
28 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Root
Foaming
FY25-27
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
618,000 2027 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
56-02
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
13,600,000 2027 5 Sausal Creek
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
62-02
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
1,080,000 2027 5
North
Kennedy
Tract
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
80-001
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
570,000 2027 5 St. Elizabeth
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
81-001
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
570,000 2027 5 Fruitvale
Station
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
83-201
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
370,000 2027 6 Seminary
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-004
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
6,800,000 2027 6 Arroyo Viejo
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-102
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
820,000 2027 7 North
Stonehurst
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-211
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
6,800,000 2027 7 Webster
Street
74,313,858
Fund 532X - Measure DD
Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Parks & Open Spaces
10th & 12th
Street
Remediation
at Peralta Park
Parks &
Recreation
532X -
Measure
DD
750,000 2026 2 10th & 12th
Street
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Glen Echo
Creek
Restoration
Public
Works
532X -
Measure
DD
485,188 2026 7
Croxton
Avenue &
Richmond
Blvd.

Parks & Open Spaces
Lake Merritt
Channel Trail
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
532X -
Measure
DD
3,250,000 2026 3 Lake Merritt
Parks & Open Spaces Estuary Park Parks &
Recreation
532X -
Measure
DD
6,000,000 2027 5 5
Embarcadero
10,485,188
Fund 5338 - Measure KK Infrastructure Bonds
Category Project
Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Buildings & Facilities
Fire
Station 29
& TREC
Training
Facility
Fire
5338 -
Measure
KK
12,720,500 2027 6 1016 66th
Avenue
12,720,500
Fund 5342 - Measure U Affordable Housing & Infrastructure Bonds (Tax Exempt)
29 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Transportation Bridge
Rehabilitation Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Buildings & Facilities
Brookdale
Recreation
Center
Expansion &
Park
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
3,000,000 2026 5 2535 High
Street
Parks & Open Spaces
Caldecott
Trailhead
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,850,000 2026 4 6900
Broadway
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
50,500,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
13,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Curb Ramps Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
9,500,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Buildings & Facilities
East Oakland
Senior Center
Renovation
Human Services
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2026 7 9255 Edes
Avenue
Transportation
Emergency
Roadway
Reconstruction
Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
3,000,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Empire Road
Storm Drain
Improvement
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,443,750 2026 7
Empire
Road
between
Cairo Rd &
Tunis Rd
Storm Drainage & Watershed
High Street
Storm
Drainage
Improvements
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,113,281 2026 5 & 6
High Street
between
Wattling St.
and
Tidewater
Ave
Buildings & Facilities
Museum
Collection
Center Seismic
Improvement
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,999,885 2026 3 1000 Oak
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Oakland Tool
Lending
Library at
Temescal
Library
Library
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2026 1
5205
Telegraph
Avenue
Parks & Open Spaces San Antonio
Park
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,850,000 2026 2 1701 E19th
Street
Transportation
Traffic Signal
Capital
Program
Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2026 Citywide Citywide
Buildings & Facilities
Arroyo Viejo
Center
Recreation
Master Plan
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 6 7701 Krause
Avenue
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Bernhardt
Drive Storm
Drainage
Improvement
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,062,500 2027
7 Bernhardt
Dr. from
Ghormley
Avenue to
Union
Pacific
Railroad
Transportation Bridge
Rehabilitation Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Broken Weirs
Replacement -
73rd and
International
Large Trash
Capture Device
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,729,021 2027 6
73rd Ave &
International
Blvd.

Buildings & Facilities
Brookdale
Recreation
Center
Expansion &
Park
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,600,000 2027 5 2535 High
Street
30 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Buildings & Facilities
Citywide
Facilities
Energy &
Building Code
Compliance
Improvements
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Buildings & Facilities
Citywide Fire
Station Energy
& Building
Code
Compliance
Improvements
Fire
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Citywide Storm
Drainage
Replacement
(eg. Joaquin
Miller Park
Storm Drain,
Moraga Ave
and Masonic
Ave Storm
Drain)
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Transportation Citywide Street
Resurfacing Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
52,000,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Complete
Streets Capital Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
12,250,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation Curb Ramps Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
9,500,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Transportation
Emergency
Roadway
Reconstruction
Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Buildings & Facilities
Fire Station 29
& TREC
Training
Facility
Fire
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
22,279,500 2027 6 1016 66th
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities Fox Theatre
Improvements
Economic
Workforce
Development
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
4,600,000 2027 3
1807
Telegraph
Avenue
Storm Drainage & Watershed
High Street
Storm
Drainage
Improvements
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
4,687,500 2027 5 & 6
High Street
between
Wattling St.
and
Tidewater
Ave
Buildings & Facilities
Library Energy
Assessments &
Upgrades to
MLK Jr.,
Golden Gate,
Temescal &
Lakeview
Branch
Libraries
Library
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Buildings & Facilities Malonga
Center
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 3 1428 Alice
Street
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Rehab Storm
Drain under
International
Blvd. between
57th and 62nd
Avenues
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
351,563 2027 6
Under
International
Blvd from
57th to 62nd
Avenues.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
Richmond
Blvd. Culvert
Repair
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
4,700,000 2027 3
3021
Richmond
Blvd.

Transportation Safe Routes to
Schools Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Buildings & Facilities
Tassafaronga
Recreation
Center
Upgrades
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027
7 975 85th
Avenue
Transportation
Traffic Signal
Capital
Program
Transportation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 Citywide Citywide
Buildings & Facilities West Oakland
Resilience Hub
Library, Parks &
Recreation,
Human Services
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 3 1801 Adeline
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Willie Keyes
Recreation
Center
Parks &
Recreation/Library
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 3 3131 Union
Street
229,517,000
31 Fund 5343 - Measure U Affordable Housing & Infrastructure Bonds (Taxable)
Category Project
Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Buildings & Facilities
Oakland Ice
Center
Refrigeration
Equipment
Economic
Workforce
Development
5343 -
Measure
U
(Taxable)
10,000,000 2026 3 519 18th
Street
10,000,000
32 OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS
City of Oakland transportation projects are organized into the 12 CIP Program categories below. For more information about individual projects, click on the photos below to visit the respective program page. Each program page includes details such as project titles, general locations, CIP prioritization scores, and proposed capital budget allocations.

The City of Oakland Department of Transportation manages CIP projects that include street paving and rehabilitation, streetscape projects, sidewalk reconstruction, curb ramp reconstruction, bridge rehabilitation, traffic calming, safe routes to schools, pedestrian safety, bicycle improvements, and traffic signals and operations. These programs aim to address the maintenance backlog of City streets and sidewalks and to improve the safety of all modes of travel, including people walking, biking, driving and taking transit.

Please note that the timeline for implementation of CIP projects is contingent on project feasibility, staff capacity, and funding availability.

Bike & Ped Plan
Implementation
Bridge Rehabilitation Citywide Street Resurfacing
Transportation | Adopted FY 2025-27 Capital Improvement ProgramTransportation | Adopted FY 2025-27 Capital Improvement Program 33 Community Transportation
Plans & Project
Development
Complete Streets Capital Curb Ramps
Emergency Roadway
Reconstruction
Sidewalk Reconstruction Safe Routes To Schools /
Speed Bumps
Traffic Safety Program Traffic Signal Capital
Program
Transportation Grant
Matching
34 FUNDING SUMMARY BY PROGRAM
The following table summarizes adopted FY 2025-27 CIP funding by transportation program. Note: For information about Buildings & Facilities, Parks & Open Spaces, Sanitary Sewer/Wastewater, and Storm Drainage & Watershed projects, please click here.

Transportation Funded by CIP Program
Project Name 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide Street Resurfacing 63,739,531 52,051,720 115,791,251 Complete Streets Capital 18,550,000 15,720,000 34,270,000 Curb Ramps 9,500,000 9,500,000 19,000,000
Emergency Roadway Reconstruction 4,000,000 1,500,000 5,500,000 Traffic Signal Capital Program 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 Sidewalk Reconstruction 3,000,000 0 3,000,000
Bridge Rehabilitation 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
Safe Routes to Schools 0 1,500,000 1,500,000
Community Transportation Plans & Project
Development 750,000 750,000 1,500,000
Citywide Street Resurfacing (In-House
Materials) 1,500,000 0 1,500,000
Speed Bump Program 750,450 726,872 1,477,322
Traffic Safety Program 1,000,000 0 1,000,000
Transportation Grant Matching 900,000 0 900,000
Bike Plan Implementation 550,000 0 550,000
Pedestrian Plan Implementation 550,000 0 550,000
TOTAL 107,289,981 84,248,592 191,538,573Transportation Funding Sources Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 78,500,000 79,250,000 157,750,000 2218 - Measure BB Local Streets & Roads 12,020,406 750,000 12,770,406 2232 - State Gas Tax SB1 RMRA 10,381,940 726,872 11,108,812 2420 - Transportation Impact Fee 2,662,000 3,470,000 6,132,000 2230 - State Gas Tax 2,276,313 0 2,276,313
2215 - Vehicle Registration Funds 962,765 51,720 1,014,485 2219 - Measure BB Bicycle & Pedestrian 486,557 0 486,557 TOTAL 107,289,981 84,248,592 191,538,573
35 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program funds planning, evaluation, project development, design, outreach, and construction for implementing the Bicycle Plan, Pedestrian Plan, and Stairs and Paths historic preservation program.

Program activities include: (1) pedestrian improvements, bikeways, bicycle parking, and signage and (2) bicycling and walking promotion activities including education classes, encouragement events, and equipment/materials.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements/amenities under this program may lead to a minimal increase in maintenance costs. Planning and outreach efforts under this program do not impact operations or maintenance costs.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2026 Total
Pedestrian Plan Implementation 550,000 550,000
Bike Plan Implementation 550,000 550,000
TOTAL 1,100,000 1,100,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2026 Total
2218 - Measure BB Local Streets & Roads 800,000 800,000 2219 - Measure BB Bicycle & Pedestrian 300,000 300,000
TOTAL 1,100,000 1,100,000
Bike and Pedestrian Plan Implementation Program

Transportation | Citywide
36 ACTIVE FUNDED PROJECTS
Bicycle Plan
Implementation
Pedestrian Plan
Implementation
Stairs & Paths Program
This program funds project
development, design, outreach,
and construction of: (1) bikeways;
(2) upgrades to existing bikeways;
(3) bicycle parking; and (4)
installation of signage along
Oakland's bikeway network. The
project also funds bicycling
promotion activities including
bicycle safety education classes
and equipment, and bicycle
encouragement events and
materials. This project funds
quick-build bikeway
improvements that do not
require a major capital
investment or paving project.

This program funds the
implementation of Oakland's
Pedestrian Plan, including the
design and construction of
pedestrian safety improvements,
planning, evaluation, promotion,
and education. Funding may be
used for: (1) implementing
pedestrian safety improvements;
(2) planning, data collection, and
community outreach; (3)
education, promotion, and event
sponsorships; (4) supporting the
Paint the Town community street
mural program; and (5) updating
Oakland’s Pedestrian Plan.

This program implements repairs
and renovations (such as
accessibility, lighting, and other
safety improvements) to
approximately 220 citywide
pedestrian stairs and pathways.

CIP funds supplement grant
funding from the Transportation
Development Act (TDA) Article 3.
37 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program fulfills rehabilitation recommended by Caltrans Bridge Inspection Reports for 38 City-owned bridges. CIP funds provide local match for bridge seismic retrofit projects, largely funded by the federal Highway Bridge Program. Due to the urgent nature of bridge rehabilitation projects for public safety, projects within this program are considered required work and must be prioritized for funding.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Bridge rehabilitation work reduces maintenance costs such as repair of deck surface cracks and joints.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Bridge Rehabilitation 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
TOTAL 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 TOTAL 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
Bridge Rehabilitation

Transportation | Citywide (see map below)
38 Berkeley
Emeryville
Piedmont
Alameda
San Leandro
Joaquin Miller
Park
Holy Names
University
Joaquin Miller
Elementary
Oakland
Tech
Claremont
Middle
Skyline High
School
Mills
College
King Estate
Park
Castlemont
High
Merritt Community
College
2025-27 Priority Bridge Projects Department of
Transportation
Bridges
Parks
Schools
N

ADELINE BRIDGE
23RD AVE BRIDGE

LEIMERT BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT
98TH AVE BRIDGE

EDGEWATER DR BRIDGES

BEACH ST BRIDGE

PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program addresses pavement rehabilitation, reconstruction, and preventive maintenance of Oakland's 850 centerline miles of paved roadway. Prioritized street segments follow the 2022 Five-Year Paving Plan adopted by City Council. This work is also coordinated with utility companies through cost-share agreements. As feasible, OakDOT will seek future funding opportunities for the unfunded major street resurfacing priorities listed in Attachment B
here.

Please note that the timeline for implementation of paving projects is contingent on staff capacity and funding availability.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: While repaving streets reduces ongoing costs for short-term maintenance (i.e. filling potholes), to assist with meeting the City’s trash load reduction mandate imposed by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board), this program will include the installation of small trash capture devices. This mandate will increase O&M costs significantly.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide Street Resurfacing 63,739,531 52,051,720 115,791,251 Citywide Street Resurfacing (In-House
Materials) 1,500,000 0 1,500,000
TOTAL 65,239,531 52,051,720 117,291,251
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 50,500,000 52,000,000 102,500,000 2218 - Measure BB Local Streets & Roads 9,470,406 0 9,470,406 2232 - State Gas Tax SB1 RMRA 4,631,490 0 4,631,490
2230 - State Gas Tax 388,313 0 388,313
2219 - Measure BB Bicycle & Pedestrian 186,557 0 186,557 2215 - Vehicle Registration Funds 62,765 51,720 114,485 TOTAL 65,239,531 52,051,720 117,291,251
Citywide Street Resurfacing

Transportation | Citywide
40 California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NAS… About
The City of Oakland's 2022 5-Year Paving Plan
began on July 1, 2022. Further information about
the plan can be viewed
here:
https://www.oaklandca.gov/projects/20225yp
In the new 5-Year Paving Plan, the City of Oakland
will aim to group streets together geographically in
order to repair streets in the same area at once. The
paving schedule will aim to balance local streets
construction across every planning area while
increasing efficiency and saving costs by reducing
the need to move equipment across the city for the
same project.

Please report potholes and street deterioration to
Oak311: https://www.oaklandca.gov/services/oak31

1. This is our one-stop shop for requests, and it's
the best way we have for logging, tracking, and
prioritizing maintenance requests.
1mi 1mi1mi 1mi1mi
 Find address or place
loading...
+
–
2022 5-Year Paving Plan Schedule (Subject to Change) City of Oakland Legend
2022 Five Year Paving Plan
Construction Year
FY 2022
FY 2023
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2026
FY 2027
FY 2028
Pavement Moratorium (Paved Within Last 5
Years)
41 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program develops community-fueled planning efforts with strong local partnerships. Through these planning processes, OakDOT aims to build consensus on transportation priorities and develop conceptual designs to support grant applications and implement community-generated projects.

OakDOT's priority projects for this program are listed below with project descriptions and CIP scores reflective of the community's input into the budget process.

Please note that the timeline for
implementation of these projects is contingent on project feasibility, staff capacity, and funding availability.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Neutral. Planning projects under this program do not impact operations or maintenance costs.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Community Transportation Plans & Project
Development 750,000 750,000 1,500,000
TOTAL 750,000 750,000 1,500,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2218 - Measure BB Local Streets & Roads 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 TOTAL 750,000 750,000 1,500,000

ACTIVE FUNDED PROJECTS
Community Transportation Plans & Project Development

Transportation | Citywide
42 Fruitvale Connections MacArthur – Lakeshore To
East Oakland
Oakland TDM And Parking
Update Project
Current Phase: Planning
Plan/design bike route
improvements on 38th Avenue
between E12th Street and
MacArthur Boulevard as well as
conduct a traffic study on lower
High Street between E12th and
Foothill Blvd. This planning study
is funded through an MTC
(Metropolitan Transportation
Commission) grant.

Current Phase: Planning
This project will engage
communities along MacArthur
Boulevard to develop multimodal
transportation improvements.

This is a multi-year, multi-phased
project that will involve applying
for outside grant funding for
construction, and working deeply
with all of the communities on
this corridor. This planning
process includes the LAMMPS
design process and the SLOW
Laurel planning process.

Current Phase: Planning
Support compliance with MTC's
Transit-Oriented Communities
(TOC) Policy Parking
Management requirements
through: (1) review and analysis of
existing off-street parking
requirements; (2) review of
Oakland’s existing TDM policies
and requirements for
development project conditions
of approval; (3) review of
OakDOT’s TDM plan monitoring
process; and (4) community and
stakeholder engagement to
develop an Ordinance to
implement any
recommendations.

PRIORITY PROJECTS FOR FUTURE FUNDING
The following projects are unfunded high scoring projects for which OakDOT is actively seeking grants to fund. Additional projects from the CIP Unfunded List will be included as new funding opportunities are identified.

43 5th Avenue Streetscape 85th Avenue Pedestrian &
Bicyclist Path
9th St Complete Streets In
Chinatown
Current Phase: Seeking Grant
Funding
Improve pedestrian, bicyclist, and
vehicular access to the
waterfront/Oakland Estuary
shoreline in the 22 block area
extending from East 18th Street
to the waterfront area along 5th
Avenue.

Current Phase: Seeking Grant
Funding
This project is envisioned as a 0.6-
mile pedestrian and bicyclist path
that will join equity priority
communities to upcoming
transformational bikeways and
the waterfront. 85th Ave will
provide the link between
waterfront trails, community
facilities, and the upcoming East
Bay Greenway and Calm East
Oakland Streets projects.

Current Phase:  Seeking Grant
Funding
9th Street (from Castro St to
Fallon St) was identified as a
priority in the Chinatown
Complete Streets Plan. Initial
designs currently propose a lane
reduction and added managed
loading and parking throughout
the corridor. Designs also include
widened sidewalks in the
Chinatown core from Broadway
to Harrison St and protected bike
lanes from Harrison to Fallon.

East Oakland Neighborhood
Initiative (EONI)
Transportation
Grand Ave Mobility Plan Harrison Complete Streets
Current Phase: Project
Development
Planning and development of
transportation projects and
greening improvements
recommended in EONI. As
individual projects are advanced,
they will be included in the CIP as
standalone projects. This includes
consideration of previous public
submissions for Upper 105th Ave
Green St Connections, 98th Ave
Pedestrian Connections, and
Sidewalk for 42nd Ave.

Current Phase: Project
Development
Project development for the
Grand Ave Mobility Plan
recommendations at: (1) Mandela
Parkway to San Pablo Avenue, (2)
San Pablo Avenue to Broadway,
(3) Broadway to Harrison Street,
(4) Harrison Street to MacArthur
Boulevard.

Current Phase: Project
Development
Harrison St (from 6th St to 14th
St) was identified as a priority in
the Chinatown Complete Streets
Plan. Initial designs currently
propose a lane reduction and
added managed loading and
parking throughout the corridor.

Designs also include angled
parking in the Chinatown core
from 8th to 11th Street and
protected bike lanes from 11th
Street to 14th Street.
44 Hegenberger Complete
Streets Plan
San Antonio & Jingletown
Neighborhood Connections
Plan
San Leandro Railroad
Crossing Improvements
Current Phase: Seeking Grant
Funding
This planning process includes
the following objectives: partner
with community-based
organizations from East Oakland,
identify baseline mobility needs
on Hegenberger Road, collect
existing conditions data and
conduct a racial equity impact
analysis, and develop up to four
design concepts.

Current Phase: Seeking Grant
Funding
Through this planning effort, the
City will collaborate with
community-based organizations,
stakeholder agencies, residents,
and businesses in San Antonio
and Jingletown to identify a set of
key corridors, facilitate
engagement, and collaboratively
develop conceptual designs that
reflect community priorities.

Current Phase: Project
Development
This project aims to upgrade
railroad crossings at locations on
San Leandro St (parallel to the
UPRR freight line) to improve
walking/biking connections to
Coliseum BART and the future
East Bay Greenway. This project
may include applying for a
Consolidated Rail Infrastructure &
Safety Improvements (CRISI)
grant.

Transit Action Strategy Webster Complete Streets
Current Phase: Project
Development
This program captures future
work towards implementing
capital improvements identified
in the OakDOT's Transit Action
Strategy. Project Corridors
include: Foothill Boulevard, 40th
Street, Telegraph Avenue,
MacArthur Boulevard, and
Fruitvale Avenue.

Current Phase: Project
Development
Webster St (from 6th St to 14th
St) was identified as a priority in
the Chinatown Complete Streets
Plan. Initial designs currently
propose a lane reduction and
added managed loading and
parking throughout the corridor.

Designs also include widened
sidewalks in the Chinatown core
from 8th to 11th St and protected
bike lanes from 11th St to 14th St.

CIP Project Scores
Project Score
East Oakland Neighborhood Initiative (EONI)
Transportation Planning And Greening 100
Harrison Complete Streets 100
Webster Complete Streets 97.5
9th St Complete Streets in Chinatown 96
Fruitvale Connections (Lower High St
Complete Streets) 91.5
San Leandro Railroad Crossing
Improvements 89
Grand Avenue Mobility Plan 88.5
85th Avenue Pedestrian and Bicyclist Path 87
Hegenberger Complete Streets Plan 86.5
San Antonio and Jingletown Neighborhood
Connections Plan 86.5
Transit Action Strategy 84
Fruitvale Connections (38th Ave
Neighborhood Bike Route) 82.5
MacArthur – Lakeshore To East Oakland 75.5
5th Avenue Streetscape 75
45 REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION
OakDOT planning staff also participate in interagency coordination on regional projects involving Oakland.

Due to limited capacity, staff resources are prioritized in alignment with the CIP prioritization values.

Projects/lead agencies include, but not limited to:
3rd St Corridor Streetscape Improvements | Port of Oakland 7th St Wood to Bay Gap Closure | Port of Oakland
Adeline Streetscape | Port of Oakland
Doolittle Drive Bay Trail | Lead TBD
East Bay Greenway - Fruitvale to San Leandro Border | Alameda CTC East Oakland AB617 | BAAQMD
Foothill Complete Streets | AC Transit
I-580 Truck Access Study | Caltrans
Link21 | BART
Oakland Alameda Access Project | Alameda CTC
Oakland Alameda Estuary Bridge | City of Alameda
San Pablo Corridor Project | Alameda CTC
Vision I-980 | Caltrans
West Oakland Link | MTC
46 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program implements transportation projects that meet complete street standards. It ensures design guidelines and standards are met while providing engineering support for grant applications and transportation project development. CIP funds under this program provide local match for grants (e.g., Active Transportation Program (ATP), Affordable Housing & Sustainable Communities (AHSC), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA), etc.) from external funding agencies, including but not limited to the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC), Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA), California Transportation Commission (CTC), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), Strategic Growth Council (SGC), and U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT).

OakDOT's priority projects for this program are listed below with project descriptions and CIP scores reflective of the community's input into the budget process.

Please note that the timeline for
implementation of these projects is contingent on project feasibility, staff capacity, and funding availability.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Neutral. While new Complete Streets improvements may increase maintenance costs, extending the useful life of existing assets can decrease maintenance costs.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Complete Streets Capital 18,550,000 15,720,000 34,270,000 TOTAL 18,550,000 15,720,000 34,270,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 13,000,000 12,250,000 25,250,000 2420 - Transportation Impact Fee 2,662,000 3,470,000 6,132,000 2230 - State Gas Tax 1,888,000 0 1,888,000
2232 - State Gas Tax SB1 RMRA 1,000,000 0 1,000,000
TOTAL 18,550,000 15,720,000 34,270,000

ACTIVE FUNDED PROJECTS
Complete Streets Capital Program

Transportation | Citywide
47 14th Avenue Streetscape
Phases 1 & 3; Gap Closure
14th Street Safety Project 18th Street Bikeway (AHSC)
Current Phase: Construction
Improve safety for all
transportation modes through
reduction of the travel way from 4
to 2 lanes and addition of
buffered bike lanes on both sides
of the street. This project will
create a bike connection
between Foothill Blvd and
Highland Hospital. CIP funds
supplement a grant from
Alameda CTC.

Current Phase: Construction
On 14th St between Brush St and
Oak St, reduce travel lanes from
four to two; add Class IV
protected bicycle lanes separated
from travel by curbs and parked
cars; implement transit boarding
islands; install green stormwater
infrastructure; and improve
pedestrian facilities. CIP funds
supplement ATP, TFCA, MTC
Quick Strike, and AHSC grant
funds.

Current Phase: Paused*
Improve bike and pedestrian
safety by implementing a road
diet, installing Class II and Class III
bikeways with high visibility
crosswalks and addressing poor
road conditions due to
abandoned rail tracks in the
streets.
*This project is currently paused
until the AHSC-funded affordable
housing development secures full
financing.
27th Street Complete Streets 2nd Street Transportation
Hub And Bike Gap Closure
7th Street Connections
Project
Current Phase: Bid Award
Create a combination of a
protected bikeway and buffered
bike lane between the already-
implemented protected bikeway
on Telegraph Avenue Complete
Streets Project and the future
bikeway on Grand Avenue. The
project includes new curb ramps,
new pedestrian signal heads, and
enhanced cross- walks. CIP funds
supplement an AHSC and
Alameda CTC grant.

Current Phase: Design
To support the southern terminus
of new bus-only lanes on
Broadway between Embarcadero
& Grand Ave and connect to the
Oakland Ferry Terminal, install
bus shelters, real-time transit
arrival info, pedestrian-scale
lighting, landscaping, and
wayfinding signage on 2nd St.

This project will fill the existing
Class II bike lane gap on 2nd St
between Harrison and Alice St.

Current Phase: Design
Create a safe route for people
walking, biking, taking transit,
and driving on 7th Street
between West Oakland BART and
Downtown Oakland on 7th St.

Replace broken, cracked, or
obstructed sidewalks, install new
curb ramps, add pedestrian
lighting, shorten crossings at
major intersections, and upgrade
traffic signals with accessible
pedestrian signalization. CIP
funds supplement REAP 2.0,
federal earmark, CalSTA, and ATP
grant funds.
48 Bancroft Greenway Broadway Streetscape
Improvements
Calm East Oakland Streets |
East Oakland Neighborhood
Bike Routes
Current Phase: Design
Reactivate the central median on
Bancroft Ave from 73rd St to
106th St, including potentially
widening the median and re-
landscaping it to accommodate a
multi-use bicycle and pedestrian
path, while also providing
accessible open green space. CIP
funds supplement an ATP grant.

Current Phase: Design
Construct new bus-only lanes,
sidewalks, underpass
improvements, signal
improvements, and wayfinding to
improve connectivity between
Downtown & Jack London
Square.

Current Phase: Design
Construct six miles of
neighborhood bike routes in East
Oakland on four corridors,
connecting schools, retail, transit
and community centers. In
alignment with neighborhood-
specific projects identified
through EONI and requests from
the public, this project will also
include signage along Black
Cultural Zone areas (International
Blvd from 79th to 92nd Ave). CIP
funds supplement an ATP grant.

Comstock Stair Path East 12th Street Bikeway East Bay Greenway Segment II & Coliseum Connections
Bike Lanes
Current Phase: Design
Rehabilitate the existing concrete
steps and install ADA compliant
handrails along both sides of the
path between East 23rd and East
24th Streets, beginning at 14th
Ave and ascending to 17th Ave.

CIP funds supplement
Transportation Development Act
(TDA) Article 3 funds.

Current Phase: Design
Complete the remaining gap for
a continuous bikeway from
downtown Oakland through East
Oakland. Install buffered bike
lanes, traffic circles and upgraded
ADA curb ramps. CIP funds
supplement a grant from
Alameda CTC.

Current Phase: Construction
Complete a shared bicyclist and
pedestrian path parallel to San
Leandro St from Seminary Ave to
69th Ave and install bike lane
striping on San Leandro from
69th Ave to 75th Ave. CIP funds
supplement AHSC, FTA, and TFCA
grant funding.
49 Embarcadero West Rail
Safety And Access
Improvements
Fruitvale Alive! Gap Closure HSIP 10 14th Street
Pedestrian Crossing
Improvements And Road
Diet
Current Phase: Design
Located on Embarcadero West
and contiguous block segments,
between Adeline Street and Oak
Street, the project will deliver
complex transportation
infrastructure elements to
improve safety, strengthen
connectivity, and increase access
to Oakland’s Downtown, West
Oakland, the Port of Oakland and
the historic waterfront. The
project is funded by a Trade
Corridor Enhancement Grant
from CTC and CalSTA.

Current Phase: Construction
Install raised cycle tracks (Class 4)
between Alameda Avenue and
E.12th Street along Fruitvale
Avenue; widen sidewalks and
improve pedestrian crossings;
add pedestrian scale lighting and
landscaped buffers; and remove
conflicting vehicular through and
slip turn lanes to increase safety.

CIP funds supplement an ATP
grant.

Current Phase: Design
Install Rapid Rectangular
Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), left-
turn only signal phases,
pedestrian countdown heads,
and leading pedestrian indicators
at 4 intersections on 14th Street
with a history of pedestrian
collisions. Implement a road diet
on 14th St between Mandela
Parkway and I-980. CIP funds
supplement HSIP grant funds.

HSIP 10 98th Avenue HSIP 10 Systemic
Improvements
HSIP 11 90th Avenue
Current Phase: Design
Install side street signal mast
arms, leading pedestrian
intervals, flashing beacons
pedestrian refuge islands, and
left-turn-only phases at
pedestrian collision locations on
98th Avenue. CIP funds
supplement HSIP grant funds.

Current Phase: Design
Install Rapid Rectangular
Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and
Intersection Lighting at six
intersections in the City of
Oakland with a history of
pedestrian collisions. CIP funds
supplement HSIP grant funds.

Current Phase: Design
Enhance pedestrian safety and
accessibility by adding leading
pedestrian intervals, pedestrian
countdown signal heads,
protected left turns, and other
safety upgrades at two major
corridor intersections on 90th
Ave. CIP funds supplement HSIP
grant funds.

HSIP 11 Leading Pedestrian
Interval Improvements
HSIP 11 Major Crossing
Improvements
HSIP 12 Neighborhood Bike
Route Major Crossings Safety
Improvements
Current Phase: Design
Enhance pedestrian safety and
accessibility by adding leading
pedestrian intervals, longer
pedestrian clearance times,
pedestrian countdown signal
heads, and updates to accessible
pedestrian signals within
Oakland’s priority equity
neighborhoods. CIP funds
supplement HSIP grant funds.

Current Phase: Design
Enhance pedestrian and bicycle
safety by installing Rectangular
Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs),
refuge islands, and bulb-outs,
and install/upgrade crosswalks
and curb ramps at non-signalized
locations that cross major arterial
and collector streets. CIP funds
supplement HSIP grant funds.

Current Phase: Planning
Install Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacons (RRFBs),
upgraded pedestrian crossings,
and raised medians/pedestrian
refuge islands at 13 citywide
priority locations. CIP funds
supplement HSIP grant funds.
50 HSIP 12 Senior Safety
Improvements
I-880/42nd/High Freeway
Access Project
Intermodal Terminal
Coliseum BART
Improvements
Current Phase: Planning
Install a protected left-turn phase,
intersection mast-arms, raised
median/pedestrian refuge
islands, and upgraded pedestrian
crossings at four priority
locations. CIP funds supplement
HSIP grant funds.

Current Phase: Right of Way
Design and construct safety
improvements at the intersection
of 42nd and High Street,
including roadway
connection/extension of 42nd
Ave; street improvements along
High Street; new roadway
connection/extension at Jensen
St; signal modifications along
High Street; and new traffic signal
and intersection improvements
at Alameda Ave/42nd. CIP funds
supplement a grant from
Alameda CTC.

Current Phase: Design
Connect streetscape and
pedestrian improvements to a
major transit village project at the
Coliseum BART Station.

Improvements include lighting,
sidewalk widening, landscaping,
and pavement rehabilitation. CIP
funds supplement federal
earmark funds.

Lakeshore Ave Separated
Bike Lanes
Lakeside Dr/Lake Merritt
Blvd Complete Streets
Paving Project
Lakeside Family Streets
Current Phase: Construction
Install a completely separated
two-way pathway for people
biking on Lakeshore Avenue
between El Embarcadero and
E18th Street, along with traffic-
calming and pedestrian safety
improvements
Current Phase: Bid Award
Construct a network of protected
bike lanes, two-way cycletracks,
buffered bike lanes, pedestrian
safety upgrades, and transit-only
lanes on Lakeside Drive between
14th Street and Madison Street,
and on Lake Merritt Blvd between
Lakeside Drive and 1st
Street/International Blvd. CIP
funds supplement grant funds
from BART.

Current Phase: Construction
Construct a raised median to
protect existing two-way cycle
track on the eastern side of
Harrison between Lakeside and
Grand on the south side of Grand
between Harrison and Bay Pl,
adjacent to Lake Merritt. North of
Grand, the project will implement
parking protected bikeways
delineated by concrete curb
medians from Harrison at Grand
to Harrison at 27th, along with a
protected intersection treatment
at Grand/Harrison. CIP funds
supplement a One Bay Area
Grant (OBAG).
51 LAMMPS Phase II & Phase III MacArthur Smart City
Corridor Phase I
Martin Luther King Jr Way
Streetscape Improvements
Current Phase: Design
Building off of the LAMMPS
Community Based Transportation
Planning process from 2010, this
project will construct a Class I off-
street walking and biking path,
close sidewalk gaps, install
lighting, and install bus shelters
along MacArthur Blvd between
Richards Rd and Camden St and
Seminary Ave between Camden
St and Sunnymere Blvd. CIP
funds supplement AHSC,
Alameda CTC, and TFCA grants.

Current Phase: Design
Extend existing Intelligent
Transportation System (ITS)
network with fiber cable to 62
traffic signals along MacArthur
Blvd and adjacent roadways.

Improvements will enhance
mobility for all modes, including
queue jump lanes and transit
signal priority for bus; pedestrian,
bicycle and vehicle detection for
enhanced signal performance;
curb ramp & sidewalk for
pedestrian accessibility;
communications for remote
traffic operations, monitoring and
signal maintenance. CIP funds
supplement a grant from
Alameda CTC.

Current Phase: Design
Construct buffered Class II and/or
Class IV bike lanes, install
sidewalk improvements and
pedestrian amenities; and
improve traffic signals to support
multimodal connectivity between
Downtown Oakland and the
waterfront.

OakPARK+ Sobrante Park-To-Brookfield
Village Neighborhood Bike
Route
Undercrossing
Improvements
Current Phase: Design
Implement various parking and
transportation demand
management programs in
Oakland including: expanding
demand-responsive parking
pricing to all metered areas,
piloting the installation of parking
sensors in high-value metered
spaces to efficiently collect
occupancy data, implementing
all-week retail-friendly metered
parking, adding 500 new
metered parking spaces, and
creating a permanent Universal
Basic Mobility Program. CIP funds
supplement an MTC grant.

Current Phase: Design
This project will implement a
neighborhood bike route (NBR)
community request. This project
envisions a "Wiggle"-style
neighborhood bike route, with
wayfinding and traffic calming.

This NBR would provide access to
the several schools west of Edes
Ave (Madison Park Academy,
Aspire Academy, Brookfield
Elementary) and to Patterson
Park/Ira Jinkins/East Oakland
Sports Center. This NBR would
utilize the paving program to
provide a route from Brookfield
Village to Sobrante Park.

Current Phase: Design
Reconnect communities by
delivering lighting, wayfinding,
and placemaking elements at I-
880/Broadway, I-
880/Washington, I-880/MLK and
I-980/7th
52 West Oakland Community
Action Plan | Transit Access
Improvements (WOTI)
Current Phase: Design
Plan, design and implement
strategies identified in the West
Oakland Community Action Plan,
including installation of sidewalk
reconstruction and street
improvements, urban greening
and vegetation, bus stop
improvements, and truck
management. CIP funds
supplement grants from the
California Air Resources Board
and Alameda CTC.
53 PRIORITY PROJECTS FOR FUTURE FUNDING
The following projects are unfunded high scoring projects for which OakDOT is actively seeking grants to fund.

73rd Avenue Safe Routes To
Transit
7th Street (MLK To Fallon)
Paving Improvement Project
8th Street Corridor
Improvements
Current Phase: Design | Seeking
Grants
Provide a safer connection for
people walking and biking to
Eastmont Transit Center,
International BRT, Coliseum
BART, and bus stops along 73rd
Ave. Enhancements will make it
safer to travel along and cross
73rd Ave. Preliminary scope
includes upgrading and installing
bike lanes, transit boarding
islands and pedestrian and
bicycle crossings.

Current Phase: Project
Development
Augmentation of existing
prioritized paving project to
deepen community
engagement, expand conceptual
design, and deliver complex
complete streets construction
scope.

Current Phase: Planning |
Seeking Grants
Base scope: construct new
pedestrian and transit
improvements to provide better
connectivity between Lake
Merritt BART, Chinatown,
Downtown. Improve existing
sidewalk conditions, daylight
intersections, expand accessible
passenger loading zones, bus
loading at Oak St. Additional
scope elements may be
considered depending on
outcomes of the initial planning
phase.
54 Coliseum BART To Bay Trail
(66th Avenue)
Franklin (6th To 22nd St)
Paving Improvement
Cycletrack Project
Foothill Complete Streets
Project
Current Phase: Design | Partially
Funded
Create a connection from East
Oakland to the MLK, Jr. Regional
Shoreline for people walking and
biking - on 66th Ave between San
Leandro St and Oakport St.

Provide a direct bicycle
connection to the eastern end of
the project area at 66th and San
Leandro St. CIP funds
supplement an Alameda CTC
grant for the design phase.

Current Phase: Design | Seeking
Grants
Repurpose one lane of vehicle
traffic on Franklin St from 11th St
to Broadway to narrow this high-
speed roadway, calm traffic,
install pedestrian safety
improvements, and implement
separated bike lanes on Franklin
Street between 11th St and 22nd
St/Broadway.

Current Phase: Project
Development
Complete Streets improvements
in coordination with the repaving
of Foothill Blvd (23rd Ave to
Fruitvale and High St to
MacArthur)
Grand Ave Complete Streets
Repaving Project
Current Phase: Design
Grand Ave from Broadway to
Elwood Avenue is set to be
repaved by the City of Oakland's
paving program. This segment of
Grand is a vital transit connection
for thousands of bus riders every
day, a key link in the City's
Bikeway Network, and a thriving
commercial corridor. This project
is also informed by the Grand Ave
Mobility Plan. Potential
improvements along this corridor
include protected bike lanes,
pedestrian safety measures, and
traffic calming measures.

Market St Streetscape /
Priority HIN Corridor / Paving
Coordination
Current Phase: Project
Development
Improve safety for all modes on
Market St between 3rd St and
San Pablo Ave as an
augmentation of the existing
prioritized paving project. Market
St is also a priority corridor on the
High Injury Network. South of
18th St, the wide roadway width
and lack of driveways are ideal
conditions for converting the
existing buffered bikeways to
separated facilities.

Martin Luther King Jr Way
Complete Streets Project
Current Phase: Design | Seeking
Grants
In coordination with the repaving
of MLK Jr Way between 47th and
61st St, implement a road diet,
parking protected bike lanes, and
pedestrian safety improvements
55 Telegraph Avenue Paving
Improvement Project
Current Phase: Design
This project will design and install
complete streets improvements
on Telegraph Ave from 52nd St to
the Berkeley City border,
including bus boarding islands
and other transit improvements,
protected bike lanes, underpass
crossing enhancements, parking
and loading changes, and
pedestrian safety upgrades
including new curb ramps.

CIP Project Scores
Project Score
8th Street Corridor Improvements 91
14th Street Safety Project 88.5
Broadway Streetscape Improvements 87
Franklin (6th to 22nd St) Paving
Improvement Cycletrack Project 86.5
Market St Streetscape / Priority HIN Corridor /
Paving Coordination 86.5
Sobrante Park-to-Brookfield Village
Neighborhood Bike Route 86
Bancroft Greenway 85.5
Martin Luther King Jr Way Complete Streets
Project 84.5
Undercrossing Improvements 84
HSIP 11 Projects 82.5
Martin Luther King Jr Way Streetscape
Improvements 82.5
18th Street Bikeway (AHSC) 82
7th Street (MLK to Fallon) Paving
Improvement Project 81.5
Lakeside Dr/Lake Merritt Blvd Complete
Streets Paving Project 80
HSIP 10 14th Street Pedestrian Crossing
Improvements And Road Diet 79
West Oakland Community Action Plan |
Transit Access Improvements (WOTI) 79
Coliseum BART To Bay Trail (66th Avenue) 78.5
HSIP 12 Safe Oakland Streets Neighborhood
Bike Route Major Crossings Safety
Improvements
78 7th Street Connections Project 77.5
East Bay Greenway Segment II 77.5
14th Avenue Streetscape Phases 1 & 3; Gap
Closure 77
I-880/42nd/High Freeway Access Project 77
73rd Avenue Active Routes to Transit 76
Embarcadero West Rail Safety and Access
Improvements 75
Grand Avenue Complete Streets Repaving
Project 75
Fruitvale Alive! Gap Closure 75
East 12th Street Bikeway 73.5
LAMMPS Phase II 73.5
27th Street Complete Streets 73
Comstock Way Stair Reconstruction 72
56 Project Score
Lakeshore Avenue Separated Bike Lanes
Project 71.5
Calm East Oakland Streets | East Oakland
Neighborhood Bike Routes 71
Garfield Elementary Pedestrian
Improvements 70
2nd Street Transportation Hub And Bike Gap
Closure 69.5
Coliseum Connections Bike Lanes 69.5
Lakeside Family Streets 69
LAMMPS Phase III 69
MacArthur Smart City Corridor 1 68.5
HSIP 12 Safe Oakland Streets Senior Safety
Improvements 67.5
Intermodal Terminal Coliseum BART
Improvements 66.5
Telegraph Avenue Paving Improvement
Project 66
HSIP 10 98th Avenue Crossing Improvements 59
HSIP 10 Systemic Crossing Improvements on
Local Streets 45
57 LAMMPS PHASE I
HSIP 8 BANCROFT
HSIP 8

DOWNTOWN
HSIP 7 VARIOUS

LOCATIONS
HSIP 7 MARKET

SAN PABLO
HSIP 7 SHATTUCK
& CLAREMONT AVE
HSIP 8 GUARDRAILS

OAKLAND HILLS

LOWER PARK BLVD BIKE & PED ENHANCEMENTS

LAKESIDE

GREENSTREET

ROCKRIDGE BART SAFE

ROUTES TO TRANSIT
I-880 UNDERCROSSING

IMPROVEMENTS

LAKE MERRITT TO BAY

TRAIL PED BRIDGE
ESTUARY PARK TRANSP.

IMPROVEMENTS
HSIP 8

FRUITVALE
HSIP 8 HIGH ST
HSIP 8 35TH AVE
19 TH ST BART TO LAKE

MERRITT URBAN GREENWAY
FY 2025-27 Complete Streets Capital Projects Department of Transportation
Projects*
Parks
Schools
N
*The following citywide projects are not shown on this map: HSIP 10 Systemic Crossing Improvements, HSIP 11 Projects, HSIP 12 Projects, OakPARK+*The following citywide projects are not shown on this map: HSIP 10 Systemic Crossing Improvements, HSIP 11 Projects, HSIP 12 Projects, OakPARK+

GRAND VIEW DR

NORTH HILL CT

MILES AVE

BUCKEYE AVE

HERMOSA AVE

THORNHILL DR

SARONI DR

CHAMBERS LN

VILLANOVA DR

SNAKE RD

MOUNTAIN

BLVD CRESTMONT DR

VICTOR AVE

PAMPAS AVE

PENNIMAN AVE

FULLINGTON ST

LEIMERT BLVD

CASTERLINE RD

TOMPKINS AVE

WHITTLE AVE

KNOLL AVE

LAGUNA AVE
55TH AVE
39TH AVE
52ND AVE
11TH AVE
10TH AVE
4TH AVE
12TH AVE
13TH AVE
98TH AVE
97TH AVE
86TH AVE76TH AVE

ROYAL ST

ASHTON AVE
83RD AVE81ST AVE
82ND AVE OAK KNOLL
BLVD
64TH AVE
69TH AVE61ST AVE63RD AVE
23RD AVE
23RD AVE
24TH AVE
26TH AVE
37TH AVE
E 9TH ST
E 28TH STE 30TH ST
29TH AVE
73RD AVE64TH AVE65TH AVE

EDWARDS AVE

HAVENSCOURT BLVD
72ND AVE
87TH AVE
102ND AVE104TH AVE
109TH AVE

ST ELMO DR

CARY AVE

TOPANGA DRCATRON DR

ESTEPA DR
36TH ST
12TH ST
28TH ST
24TH ST

APGAR ST
46TH ST
26TH ST
7TH ST
5TH ST
8TH ST
12TH ST
10TH ST
10TH ST
14TH ST
14TH ST
BAY PL

W GRAND AVE

ELYSIAN

FIELDS DR
42ND ST
61ST ST
62ND ST

ALCATRAZ AVE
YERBA

BUENA AVE

CARRINGTON
ST
44TH ST
43RD ST

CLAREMONT AVE

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

INTERNATIONAL BLVD BRT-SUPPORTIVE PED IMPROVEMENT PHASE IISAN ANTONIO WAY

PLYMOUTH ST

BANCROFT AVE

STEARNS AVE

BURR ST

SUNNYSIDE ST

HILLSIDE ST

HARVEY AVE

EDES AVEWALTER AVE

FOOTHILL BLVD

FOOTHILL BLVD
E 15TH ST
E 15TH ST
E 19TH ST

VICKSBURG AVE

COOLIDGE AVE

KINGSLAND AVE

CAMDEN ST

HALLIDAY AVE

HILLSIDE ST

TELEGRAPH AVE

TELEGRAPH AVE

WESTALL AVE MACARTHUR BLVD

MACARTHUR BLVDHAROLD ST

PARK BLVD

TELEGRAPH AVE

WEST ST
ELM ST

BROOK ST

JEFFERSON ST

PINE ST

WOOD ST

POPLAR ST

ADELINE ST

FRANKLIN STALICE STBROADWAY

KELLER AVE

FONTAINE ST

UTAH ST

GRANADA AVE

HOLLIS ST

OAKPORT ST

COLISEUM WAY

COLLEGE AVE

LOWELL ST

GRAND AVE

OAKLAND AVE

ESTEPA DR
12TH ST

APGAR ST
26TH ST
28TH ST
BAY PL

ELYSIAN

FIELDS DR

GREENVIEW DR
42ND ST
54TH ST
65TH ST

POIRIER ST
62ND ST

ALCATRAZ AVE
YERBA

BUENA AVE

CARRINGTON
ST
44TH ST
43RD ST
Knowland
Park

SUMMIT ST

GLEASON WAY
E 18TH ST
E 21ST ST

FRUITVALE ALIVE

GAP CLOSURE

MARR AVE KNOLL AVE
55TH AVE
39TH AVE
52ND AVE
11TH AVE
10TH AVE
12TH AVE
13TH AVE
98TH AVE
76TH AVE ROYAL ST

ASHTON AVE
82ND AVE
64TH AVE
69TH AVE61ST AVE63RD AVE
23RD AVE
BRIDGE
23RD AVE
24TH AVE
26TH AVE
37TH AVE
E 28TH STE 30TH ST
HSIP 8 FRUITVALE
73RD AVE

EDWARDS AVE

HOLMES AVE

GREENRIDGE DR

HAVENSCOURT BLVD
72ND AVE
87TH AVE

ST ELMO DR

CARY AVE

TOPANGA DRCATRON DR

WEST ST

JEFFERSON ST

ADELINE ST

BROADWAY

KELLER AVE

SHETLAND AVE

PERALTA

OAKS CT

FONTAINE ST

UTAH ST

HOLLIS ST

OAKPORT ST

COLISEUM WAY

GRAND VIEW DR

MILES AVE

THORNHILL DR

THORNHILL DR

SNAKE RD
CASTLE

PARK WAY

LA CUESTA ST

KLAMATH ST

BALMORAL DR

MOUNTAIN
BLVD

MOUNTAIN
BLVD

MOUNTAIN
BLVD

ST PAUL CT

SHERIDAN RD

OSTRANDER RD

LAMMPS PHASE I

FULLINGTON ST

TOMPKINS AVEWHITTLE AVE

HEARST AVE FLORIDA ST

SAN LUIS
AVE

CLAREMONT AVE

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

SAN ANTONIO WAY

PLYMOUTH ST

STEARNS AVE

SUNNYSIDE ST

HARVEY AVE

EDES AVE

EDES AVE

WALTER AVE

EMPIRE RD
42ND HIGH ST
I-880 ACCESS

FOOTHILL BLVD
E 15TH ST
E 15TH ST
E 19TH ST

CONGRESS AVE

COOLIDGE AVE

KINGSLAND AVE

CAMDEN ST

HALLIDAY AVE

HILLSIDE ST

COLLEGE AVE

BENVENUE AVE

REGENT ST

CANNING ST

LOWELL ST

GRAND AVE

OAKLAND AVE

MACARTHUR BLVD

MACARTHUR BLVDHAROLD ST

PARK BLVD
Berkeley
Emeryville
Piedmont
Alameda
San Leandro
Joaquin Miller
Park
Holy Names
University
Joaquin Miller
Elementary
Oakland
Tech
Claremont
Middle
Skyline High
School
Mills
College
King Estate
Park
Merritt Community
College
Castlemont
High
42ND HIGH ST
I-880 ACCESS

FRUITVALE ALIVE

GAP CLOSURE

INTERMODAL

COLISEUM
BART
2ND ST

TRANSPORTATION HUB
& BIKE GAP CLOSURE
SURE
73RD AVE TRANSIT
CO

NNECTIO
NS
H
SIP 10 98TH A
VE IM
P.

W. OAKLAND

COMMUNITY

ACTION PLAN/

TRANSIT ACCESS
18TH ST BIKEWAY
HSIP 10 14TH ST
7TH ST CONNECTION

FRANKLIN
CYCLETRACK14TH ST SAFETY PROJ.
8TH ST CORRIDOR IMPS.
14TH AVE
ST
REETS

CAPE & GAP CL
O

MACARTHUR SMART CITY CORRIDOR
E OAKLAND NEIGHBORHOOD BIKE RTES.

EAST BAY GREENWAY SEG. 2/COLISEUM PLACE BIKE LANES
LAKESIDE FAMILY27TH ST CO MPLETE ST COMSTOCK

STAIR PATH

BANCROFT AVE GREENWAY

LAKESHORE AVE

BIKE LANES

LAMMPS PHASE II, III

MLK JR WAY

COMPLETE STREETS
E 12TH BIKEWAY

BROADWAY

STREETSCAPE

MLK JR WAY

STREETSCAPE

UNDERCROSSING

IMPROVEMENTS

COLISEUM BART

TO BAY TRAIL
(66TH AVE)

EMBARCADERO

WEST RAIL SAFETY

LAKESIDE DR/

LAKE MERRITT BLVD

COMPLETE ST
58 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program will implement the Council-adopted ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan and install curb ramps along the designated corridors prioritized in the Council-adopted Sidewalk Prioritization Plan, and in coordination with the disabled parking zone program. Based on the Americans Disability Act (ADA) of 1990, Oakland is under a legal mandate to take proactive steps to improve ADA access in the public way.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Neutral. No additional operating or maintenance impacts identified at this time. This program brings City curb ramps up to current ADA standards.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Curb Ramps 9,500,000 9,500,000 19,000,000
TOTAL 9,500,000 9,500,000 19,000,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 9,500,000 9,500,000 19,000,000 TOTAL 9,500,000 9,500,000 19,000,000
Curb RampsCurb Ramps

TransportationTransportation || CitywideCitywide
59 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program provides engineering design services for issues such as stabilizing collapsed roadways, sinkhole rehabilitation, construction of retaining walls, backfill and compaction of landslide areas, and repaving to re-open affected roadways. The program also funds a large contract to resolve storm-related damage. Based on the severity of the storm, this program allows OakDOT to match FEMA funds to complete work in affected locations. This program is required to maintain basic function of city roadways and preserve safety.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Emergency repairs may reduce future maintenance costs.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Emergency Roadway Reconstruction 4,000,000 1,500,000 5,500,000 TOTAL 4,000,000 1,500,000 5,500,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 3,000,000 1,500,000 4,500,000 2232 - State Gas Tax SB1 RMRA 1,000,000 0 1,000,000
TOTAL 4,000,000 1,500,000 5,500,000
Emergency Roadway Repair

Transportation | Citywide
60 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
The OakDOT Traffic Safety Request Program works to deliver quick-build and low-cost improvements— typically using traffic signs, pavement markings, and small-scale traffic calming devices—to improve traffic safety by reducing traffic speeds and calming driving behavior. OakDOT receives approximately 1,000 requests each year via 311 to improve traffic safety. Examples of improvements include installing traffic signals, adding a bicycle lane, installing visible crosswalks and yield markings, eliminating left turns, painting curb extensions, and enlarging medians.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Program improvements, such as new traffic signals, signage, and painted crosswalks, may lead to minimal increases in operations/maintenance costs.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2026 Total
Traffic Safety Program 1,000,000 1,000,000
TOTAL 1,000,000 1,000,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2026 Total
2218 - Measure BB Local Streets & Roads 1,000,000 1,000,000 TOTAL 1,000,000 1,000,000
Traffic Safety Program

Transportation | Citywide
61 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program implements tools to calm traffic based on adopted engineering standards and public support.

Program activities include collaboration with Alameda CTC and Oakland Unified to identify school safety improvements, speed bump implementation, and community violence prevention. Slower traffic in neighborhoods enhance public safety and overall quality of life. Traffic calming projects will explore adding cultural elements and multilingual signage as feasible.

OakDOT's priority projects for this program are listed below. Please note that the timeline for implementation of these projects is contingent on project feasibility, staff capacity, and funding availability.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Typical improvements within this program include traffic signs, pavement markings, and small-scale traffic calming devices, all of which may lead to minimal increases in operations/maintenance costs.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name FY2026 FY2027
Budget
Speed Bump Program 750,450 726,872
Safe Routes to Schools 0 1,500,000
BUDGET 750,450 2,226,872
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number FY2026 FY2027
Budget
2232 - State Gas Tax SB1 RMRA 750,450 726,872
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 0 1,500,000
BUDGET 750,450 2,226,872
Safe Routes to Schools / Speed Bumps Program

Transportation | Citywide
62 ACTIVE FUNDED PROJECTS
Community Safety Program Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
Program
Speed Bump Program
Current Phase: Operations
This program funds OakDOT's
collaboration with other City
departments (i.e., Violence
Prevention, Police, Fire, and the
City Administrator's Office) to
address community issues
involving elements of social
behavior, public health, and
street design. Through
engineering design, the program
aims to tackle issues such as
sideshows, human and drug
trafficking, public nuisance, and
driver violence. The areas of
primary focus are defined by the
NEST (Neighborhood Enhanced
Service Team) initiative in police
beats that experience the highest
levels of violence.

Current Phase:

Planning/Design/Construction
Deliver roadway safety
improvements for K-12 schools in
Oakland, with an emphasis on
pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure. Recommended
measures were developed in
partnership with school
communities and include bulb-
outs, raised crosswalks, traffic
circles, curb ramps, protected
bike lanes, and rectangular rapid
flashing beacons. Projects
encompassed by this program
will implement
recommendations developed
through walk audits in
partnership with Alameda CTC
and Oakland Unified.

Current Phase:

Investigation/Design/Construction
Install speed bumps citywide
annually in response to petitions
received from the public. Oakland
installs speed bumps on
residential streets to encourage
motorists to travels at safe
speeds. For more info,
please
click here.
63 PRIORITY PROJECTS FOR FUTURE FUNDING
The following projects are unfunded high scoring projects for which OakDOT is actively seeking grants to fund.

Bancroft Pedestrian
Crossing Improvements
Elmhurst Traffic Calming East Oakland Traffic Calming
Current Phase: Not Started
Traffic study of unsignalized
intersections on Bancroft
between 47th and 67th Ave,
exploring opportunities for
pedestrian safety improvements.

Current Phase: Not Started
Traffic study to plan for traffic
calming improvements in the
lettered streets (A through G) in
the Elmhurst neighborhood.

Current Phase: Not Started
Traffic study to plan for
improvements to calm traffic and
address "donuts" at the
intersections of Wentworth and
Fairfax; Wentworth and 55th Ave;
Princeton and Fairfax; and
Princeton and 55th Ave.

Roosevelt Middle School
Traffic Calming
Sobrante Park Traffic
Calming Project
Current Phase: Not Started
Traffic study to plan for
improvements around the
intersection of 18th Ave and East
20th St across from Roosevelt
Middle School.

Current Phase: Not Started
This project focuses on streets
within Sobrante Park where
speed bumps have not been
installed due to overlap with AC
Transit bus routes. Modified
speed bump designs that
accommodate buses will be
explored that meet AC Transit
consent, resident petition, vehicle
speed, street width and grade
requirements.
64 CIP Project Scores
Project Score
Elmhurst Traffic Calming 92
Bancroft Pedestrian Crossing Improvements 89.5
East Oakland Traffic Calming 78.5
Roosevelt Middle School Traffic Calming
Island 77
Sobrante Park Traffic Calming Project 77
65 Berkeley
Emeryville
Piedmont
Alameda
San Leandro
Joaquin Miller
Park
Holy Names
University
Joaquin Miller
Elementary
Oakland
Tech
Claremont
Middle
Skyline High
School
Mills
College
King Estate
Park
Castlemont
High
Merritt Community
College
2025-27 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Project Sites Department of Transportation
Major Streets
SRTS Sites
Parks
Other Schools
N

SANKOFA

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

KIPP BRIDGE

ACADEMY

OAKLAND SCHOOL

FOR THE ARTS
DEWEY ACADEMY/slash.case

LA ESCUELITA ELEMENTARY

COMMUNITY SCHOOL

FOR CREATIVE EDUCATION

MANZANITA

COMMUNITY SCHOOL

SEQUOIA

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

REDWOOD HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

SKYLINE HIGH

OAKLAND

CHARTER ACADEMY

BRIDGES ACADEMY

AT MELROSE

LOCKWOOD

STEAM ACADEMY

RUDSDALE

CONTINUATION SCHOOL

ELMHURST

MIDDLE SCHOOL

ESPERANZA

ELEMENTARY

PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program reconstructs official tree-damaged sidewalks, rehabilitates sidewalk damage at City facilities, and facilitates private property sidewalk reconstruction. The Council-adopted Sidewalk Prioritization Plan (2008) establishes a policy framework for prioritizing sidewalk reconstruction along identified transit corridors, addressing residential sidewalks and incorporating a liability reduction program. This program will increase ADA compliance, reduce trip and fall liability, and address sidewalk damage through proactive inspection, rather than relying on reactive responses to resident complaints.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Program improvements are anticipated to reduce ongoing costs due to the reduction of trip and fall claims as well as reduction of rehabilitation costs associated with drainage issues such as flooding due to uneven gutters
ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2026 Total
Sidewalk Reconstruction 3,000,000 3,000,000
TOTAL 3,000,000 3,000,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2026 Total
2232 - State Gas Tax SB1 RMRA 3,000,000 3,000,000
TOTAL 3,000,000 3,000,000
Sidewalk Reconstruction

Transportation | Citywide
66 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program funds various safety, access and mobility projects that include the following:
1) Implementation of safety, access and mobility capital projects, including automated speed enforcement 2) Traffic signal operation
3) Operation and maintenance of the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) 4) Traffic signal upgrades and modernization
5) Planning and development of traffic capital projects 6) Various responses and investigations for concerns of community members and advocates Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Typical improvements within this program include traffic signal upgrades and modernization, which may lead to a minimal increase in operations/maintenance costs.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
DOT Program - Traffic Signal
Project Name 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Traffic Signal Capital Program 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 TOTAL 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 TOTAL 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000
Traffic Signal Capital Program

Transportation | Citywide
67 PROGRAM OVERVIEW
This program funds local match for grant-funded transportation projects. Local match funding is required for most federal, state, and county transportation grants. This funding source can be used for existing grant funded projects or new grants.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) impact: Neutral. While new grant-funded transportation improvements may increase maintenance costs, extending the useful life of existing assets can decrease maintenance costs.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Name 2026 Total
Transportation Grant Matching 900,000 900,000
TOTAL 900,000 900,000
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2026 Total
2215 - Vehicle Registration Funds 900,000 900,000
TOTAL 900,000 900,000
Transportation Grant Matching

Transportation | Citywide
68 OVERVIEW OF CATEGORIES
City of Oakland Public Works projects are organized into the 4 CIP categories below. For more information about the projects in the categories, click on the photos below to visit the respective category page. Each category page includes details such as project titles, descriptions, CIP prioritization scores, and proposed capital budget allocations.

Buildings & Structures Parks & Open Spaces
Sanitary Sewer & Wastewater Storm Drainage & Watershed
Public Works | FY 2025-27 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects 69 70

CATEGORY OVERVIEW
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Impacts
New Buildings: The overall O&M costs would increase due to the added costs of new staffing to operate and maintain the facility, insurance premiums, property taxes, maintenance/cleaning, repairs and utilities. Energy efficiency measure required in new construction will help reduce the City's operating budget with the reduction in utility costs.

Building Renovations: The overall O&M costs for renovations of an existing facility are anticipated to remain neutral. Normal routine increased costs for staffing, insurance premiums, property taxes and utilities would be offset by reductions in repairs, maintenance, and utility costs for projects that incorporate renewable energy generation and/or building envelope upgrades.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Funding
Category 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Buildings & Facilities 18,819,153 54,526,930 73,346,083 TOTAL 18,819,153 54,526,930 73,346,083
Project Fund Source
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 8,499,885 41,479,500 49,979,385 5338 - Measure KK 0 12,720,500 12,720,500
5343 - Measure U (Taxable) 10,000,000 0 10,000,000
1010 - General Purpose Fund 319,268 326,930 646,198
TOTAL 18,819,153 54,526,930 73,346,083

ADOPTED PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS &
SCORES
Buildings & StructuresBuildings & Structures

Public WorksPublic Works || Citywide Citywide (see map below)(see map below) 71 Arroyo Viejo Center
Recreation Master Pan
Brookdale Recreation Center
Expansion & Park
Improvements
Citywide Facilities Energy &
Building Code Compliance
Improvements
Project Score: 103
Master Plan entire park and
possible expansion or
replacement of the existing
recreation center, Head start
facilities based on
facility/department needs.

Project Score: 104

Complete site Master Plan for
renovation/expansion of existing
recreation center and Science
Discovery Center and renovation
of ballfield/courts/playground.

Implement Phase 1 site
improvement work.

Project Score: N/A

Citywide Facilities assessments,
identification of critical
improvements required to
comply with energy & building
code, cost estimation and
prioritization for implementation.

Citywide Fire Station Energy
& Building Code Compliance
Improvements
East Oakland Senior Center
Renovation
Fire Station #29 (New) &
TREC Training Facility
Project Score: N/A
Citywide Fire Station building
assessments, identification of
critical improvements required to
comply with energy & building
code,  cost estimation and
prioritization for implementation.

Highest priority improvements
will proceed with design,
permitting and construction as
funding allows, and future
funding needs will be identified.

Project Score: 73.2

Demolition and renovation of
ground floor spaces including
kitchens, lavatories, dining rooms,
classrooms, canteen/lounge,
hallways and storage areas. Prep
kitchens and install new
appliances and equipment to
improve food safety and food
preparation; energy upgrades,
lighting wiring controller for areas
of improvement and 2 historic
exterior light fixtures.

Project Score: 103

Design and construction of a new
relocated Fire Station #29.
72 Fox Theatre Improvements Library Energy Assessments
& Upgrades To MLK Jr.,
Golden Gate, Temescal &
Lakeview Branch Libraries
Malonga Center
Project Score: 45.7
Completion of urgent major roof
repairs and HVAC system
upgrades in the City-owned Fox
Oakland Theater.

Project Score: 104

Energy assessments and
upgrades to branches to mitigate
air quality and meet ECAP.

Project Score: N/A

Update building systems,
including structural and MEP to
meet current code compliance,
enhance accessibility, renovate
existing performance arts spaces
to support arts programming,
increase exhibit space, provide
new signage, and renovate
residential units to support full
occupancy.
73 Museum Collection Center
Seismic Improvements
Museum Improvements  Oakland Ice Center
Refrigeration Equipment
Project Score: 21.5
To protect the City’s irreplaceable
collection and provide a safe and
secure environment for the
people who work in this building,
repairs must be done to at least
the most vulnerable
truss members, the exterior walls,
and their connection to the roof.

The Museum has conducted four
independent studies from
structural engineers to determine
the best approach to these
repairs. A targeted approach to
the joists that carry the most load
and are in the worst condition,
coupled with reinforcement of
the exterior walls with steel
columns is necessary to maintain
the structural integrity of the
building.

Project Score: N/A

Fund allocation to perform
improvements per Museum's
discretion.

Project Score: N/A

Design, construct and installation
of a complete and independent
Tool Lending Library space
behind the Temescal Branch
Library with associated site work.

Units may be prefabricated.
74 Oakland Tool Lending Library At Temescal
Library
Tassafaronga Recreation Center Upgrades
Project Score: 104
Design, construct and installation of a complete and
independent Tool Lending Library space behind the
Temescal Branch Library with associated site work.

Units may be prefabricated.

Project Score: 76.2
Facility improvements to make the site Emergency
Respite Center ready.  Improvements may include
replacing the roof at the gym building, evaluating
and upgrades to the existing air condition unit and
ventilation system.

West Oakland Resilience Hub Willie Keyes Recreation Center Project Score: 103
Study 3 City facilities - WO Library, WO Senior Center
and DeFremery to create new West Oakland Hub
and complete 35% design.

Project Score: 75.2
Facility improvements to make the site Emergency
Respite Center ready.  Improvements to existing
systems may include electrical, heating, ventilation
and air conditioning.

Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Buildings & Facilities
Brookdale
Recreation
Center
Expansion &
Park
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
3,000,000 2026 5 2535 High
Street
Buildings & Facilities
East Oakland
Senior Center
Renovation
Human Services
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2026 7
9255
Edes
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Museum
Collection
Center
Seismic
Improvement
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,999,885 2026 3 1000 Oak
Street
Buildings & Facilities Museum
Improvements Public Works
1010 -
General
Purpose
Fund
319,268 2026 3 1000 Oak
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Oakland Ice
Center
Refrigeration
Equipment
Economic
Workforce
Development
5343 -
Measure
U
(Taxable)
10,000,000 2026 3 519 18th
Street
75 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Buildings & Facilities
Oakland Tool
Lending
Library at
Temescal
Library
Library
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2026 1
5205
Telegraph
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Arroyo Viejo
Center
Recreation
Master Plan
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 6
7701
Krause
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Brookdale
Recreation
Center
Expansion &
Park
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,600,000 2027 5 2535 High
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Citywide
Facilities
Energy &
Building Code
Compliance
Improvements
Public Works
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Buildings & Facilities
Citywide Fire
Station Energy
& Building
Code
Compliance
Improvements
Fire
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Buildings & Facilities
Fire Station 29
& TREC
Training
Facility
Fire
5338 -
Measure
KK
12,720,500 2027 6 1016 66th
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Fire Station 29
& TREC
Training
Facility
Fire
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
22,279,500 2027 6 1016 66th
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities Fox Theatre
Improvements
Economic
Workforce
Development
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
4,600,000 2027 3
1807
Telegraph
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
Library Energy
Assessments
& Upgrades to
MLK Jr.,
Golden Gate,
Temescal &
Lakeview
Branch
Libraries
Library
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Buildings & Facilities Malonga
Center
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,500,000 2027 3 1428 Alice
Street
Buildings & Facilities Museum
Improvements Public Works
1010 -
General
Purpose
Fund
326,930 2027 3 1000 Oak
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Tassafaronga
Recreation
Center
Upgrades
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 7 975 85th
Avenue
Buildings & Facilities
West Oakland
Resilience
Hub
Library, Parks &
Recreation,
Human Services
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 3
1801
Adeline
Street
Buildings & Facilities
Willie Keyes
Recreation
Center
Parks &
Recreation/Library
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 3
3131
Union
Street
73,346,083
76 Legend - Buildings & Structures
Legend Category Project Title Project
Number Location
1 Buildings &
Facilities
Citywide Facilities
Energy & Building Code
Compliance
Improvements
1008051 Citywide
2 Buildings &
Facilities
Citywide Fire Station
Energy & Building Code
Compliance
Improvements
1008052 Citywide
3 Buildings &
Facilities
Library Energy
Assessments and
Upgrades
1005867 Citywide
4 Buildings &
Facilities
Oakland Tool Lending
Library 1004983 5205 Telegraph
Avenue
5 Buildings &
Facilities
West Oakland
Resilience Hub 1005872 1801 Adeline Street
6 Buildings &
Facilities
East Oakland Senior
Center Renovation 1004852 9255 Edes Avenue
7 Buildings &
Facilities
Willie Keyes Recreation
Center 1005866 3131 Union Street
8 Buildings &
Facilities
Brookdale Recreation
Center Expansion &
Park Improvements
1004849 2535 High Street
9 Buildings &
Facilities
Arroyo Viejo Center
Recreation Master Plan 1004848 7701 Krause Avenue
10 Buildings &
Facilities
Fox Theatre
Renovations 1005784 1807 Telegraph
Avenue
11 Buildings &
Facilities Malonga Center 1006040 1428 Alice Street
12 Buildings &
Facilities
Museum Collection
Center Seismic
Improvement
1004861 1000 Oak Street
13 Buildings &
Facilities
Tassafaronga
Recreation Center
Upgrades
1005865 975 85th Avenue
77 Legend Category Project Title Project
Number Location
17 Buildings &
Facilities Museum Improvements 1004222 1000 Oak Street
18 Buildings &
Facilities Fire Station 29 1004854 1016 66th Avenue
21 Buildings &
Facilities
Oakland Ice Center
Refrigeration
Equipment
1000010 519 18th street

78 Berkeley
Emeryville
Piedmont
Alameda
San Leandro
Joaquin Miller
Park
Holy Names
University
Joaquin Miller
Elementary
Oakland
Tech
Claremont
Middle
Skyline High
School
Mills
College
King Estate
Park
Castlemont
High
Merritt Community
College
580
80 980
13 880
880
580
24 880

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

BANCROFT AVE

EDES AVE

FOOTHILL BLVD
E 15TH ST
E 19TH ST

COOLIDGE AVE

COLLEGE AVE

GRAND AVE

OAKLAND AVE

MACARTHUR BLVD

MACARTHUR BLVD

PARK BLVD

WEST ST

ADELINE ST

BROADWAY

OAKPORT ST

COLISEUM WAY

THORNHILL DR

MOUNTAIN
BLVD
23RD AVE
37TH AVE
55TH AVE
13TH AVE
98TH AVE
97TH AVE
86TH AVE
76TH AVE
82ND AVE
64TH AVE
61ST AVE
E 28TH STE 30TH ST

FRUITVALE
73RD AVE
12TH ST
BAY PL
65TH ST

ALCATRAZ AVE
Knowland
Park
E 18TH ST

TELEGRAPH AVE

SNAKE RD
23RD AVEE 9TH ST
109TH AVE
24TH ST
7TH ST
5TH ST12TH ST
10TH ST
14TH ST
14TH ST

W GRAND AVE
42ND ST

HILLSIDE ST

FOOTHILL BLVD

WOOD ST

FRANKLIN STALICE ST

KELLER AVECLAREMONT AVE

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

SAN PABLO AVE
14 4
7 15
8 9
13 6
16 10 11
12/175
18 19/20
21 1 - 3 Citywide
2025-27 Funded Public Work Projects
Buildings and Parks
Public Works
Department
Parks
Building Improvement
Schools
Location to be Determined
N
Park Improvement
*

CATEGORY OVERVIEW
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Impacts
New Open Spaces: The overall O&M costs for brand-new or expanded park open space (including play areas) would increase due to the added costs of staffing, insurance premiums, property taxes, maintenance/cleaning, equipment, fuel, repairs, utilities.

Open Space Improvements: The overall O&M costs for renovations of an existing park open space (including play areas) are anticipated to remain neutral or decrease. Routine or annual increases in costs for staffing, maintenance/cleaning, insurance premiums, property taxes and utilities would be offset by reductions in repairs, equipment, utility costs for projects that incorporate renewable energy generation.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Funding
Category 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Parks & Open Spaces 8,700,000 6,000,000 14,700,000
TOTAL 8,700,000 6,000,000 14,700,000
Project Fund Source
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
532X - Measure DD 4,000,000 6,000,000 10,000,000
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 4,700,000 0 4,700,000
TOTAL 8,700,000 6,000,000 14,700,000

ADOPTED PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS &
SCORES
Parks & Open Spaces

Public Works | Citywide (see map below)
79 10th & 12th Street Remediation at Peralta
Park
Caldecott Trailhead Improvements Estuary Park
Project Score: N/A
Revegetation/replanting of
Peralta Park as required by the
environmental regulatory
agencies with annual monitoring
and reporting for 10 years.

Project Score: N/A

Renovate parking lot and
trailhead area.

Project Score: 103

Planning, design and
construction of new Park and Bay
Trail.  Phase 1 renovation of
existing park improvements
identified in the adopted Estuary
Park Master Plan. Phase 1 area
may include the shoreline and
Bay Trail, and amenities such as
picnic areas as funding allows.

Lake Merritt Channel Trail Improvements San Antonio Park Project Score: N/A
Tunnel trail improvements at Lake Merritt channel
tide gates.  Plant restoration and renovations at the
Lake Merritt channel pathway and of the East
Estuary pathway.

Project Score: 103
Renovation and expansion of the playground as
envisioned and prioritized in the approved San
Antonio Park Master Plan.

Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Parks & Open Spaces
10th & 12th
Street
Remediation
at Peralta Park
Parks &
Recreation
532X -
Measure
DD
750,000 2026 2 10th & 12th
Street
Parks & Open Spaces
Caldecott
Trailhead
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
2,850,000 2026 4 6900
Broadway
Parks & Open Spaces
Lake Merritt
Channel Trail
Improvements
Parks &
Recreation
532X -
Measure
DD
3,250,000 2026 3 Lake Merritt
Parks & Open Spaces San Antonio
Park
Parks &
Recreation
5342 -
Measure
U (Tax
Exempt)
1,850,000 2026 2 1701 E19th
Street
80 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Parks & Open Spaces Estuary Park Parks &
Recreation
532X -
Measure
DD
6,000,000 2027 5 5
Embarcadero
14,700,000
Legend - Parks & Open Spaces
Legend Category Project Title Project
Number Location
14 Parks & Open
Spaces
Caldecott Trailhead
Improvements 1001412 6900 Broadway
15 Parks & Open
Spaces San Antonio Park 1004863 1701 E19th Street
16 Parks & Open
Spaces Estuary Park 1000858 5 Embarcadero
19 Parks & Open
Spaces
10th & 12th Street
Remediation at Peralta
Park
1000693 10th & 12th Street
20 Parks & Open
Spaces
Lake Merritt Channel
Trail Improvements 1008073 Lake Merritt Channel
Tunnel

81 Berkeley
Emeryville
Piedmont
Alameda
San Leandro
Joaquin Miller
Park
Holy Names
University
Joaquin Miller
Elementary
Oakland
Tech
Claremont
Middle
Skyline High
School
Mills
College
King Estate
Park
Castlemont
High
Merritt Community
College
580
80 980
13 880
880
580
24 880

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

BANCROFT AVE

EDES AVE

FOOTHILL BLVD
E 15TH ST
E 19TH ST

COOLIDGE AVE

COLLEGE AVE

GRAND AVE

OAKLAND AVE

MACARTHUR BLVD

MACARTHUR BLVD

PARK BLVD

WEST ST

ADELINE ST

BROADWAY

OAKPORT ST

COLISEUM WAY

THORNHILL DR

MOUNTAIN
BLVD
23RD AVE
37TH AVE
55TH AVE
13TH AVE
98TH AVE
97TH AVE
86TH AVE
76TH AVE
82ND AVE
64TH AVE
61ST AVE
E 28TH STE 30TH ST

FRUITVALE
73RD AVE
12TH ST
BAY PL
65TH ST

ALCATRAZ AVE
Knowland
Park
E 18TH ST

TELEGRAPH AVE

SNAKE RD
23RD AVEE 9TH ST
109TH AVE
24TH ST
7TH ST
5TH ST12TH ST
10TH ST
14TH ST
14TH ST

W GRAND AVE
42ND ST

HILLSIDE ST

FOOTHILL BLVD

WOOD ST

FRANKLIN STALICE ST

KELLER AVECLAREMONT AVE

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

SAN PABLO AVE
14 4
7 15
8 9
13 6
16 10 11
12/175
18 19/20
21 1 - 3 Citywide
2025-27 Funded Public Work Projects
Buildings and Parks
Public Works
Department
Parks
Building Improvement
Schools
Location to be Determined
N
Park Improvement
*

CATEGORY OVERVIEW
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Impacts
The overall O&M costs for the rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer system are anticipated to be neutral. If installation of the new trash capture devices are included with the rehabilitation, maintenance costs will increase and while the overall repairs for this renovated infrastructure will decrease.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Funding
Category 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater 37,935,858 36,378,000 74,313,858 TOTAL 37,935,858 36,378,000 74,313,858
Project Fund Source
Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
3100 - Sewer Service Fund 37,935,858 36,378,000 74,313,858 TOTAL 37,935,858 36,378,000 74,313,858

ADOPTED PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS &
SCORES
Sanitary Sewers & Wastewater

Public Works | Citywide (see map below)
82 Emergency Sewer Repairs Hotspot Sewer Repair Root Foaming FY25-27 Project Score: N/A
These emergency on-call projects
will rehabilitate the sanitary
sewer system on an as-needed
basis to repair acute defect pipes
within one year of identification
and other sewer main defects,
and infiltration and inflow sources
in compliance with the Consent
Decree requirement.

Project Score: N/A

These emergency on-call projects
will rehabilitate the sanitary
sewer system on an as-needed
basis to repair acute defect pipes
within one year of identification
and other sewer main defects,
and infiltration and inflow sources
in compliance with the Consent
Decree requirement.

Project Score: N/A

Under the Consent Decree, the
City is required to reduce
infiltration to the sanitary sewer
system and thereby reduce the
discharge of untreated sewage
into local creeks, lakes, and the
Bay. In support of a regional
program, this annual program
will fund root foaming of selected
sewer pipes (TBD) at various
locations throughout the City.
83 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 56-
02 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 60-
03/17
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 62-
02 Project Score: 97
Under the Consent Decree, the
City is mandated to rehabilitate 13
miles of the aging sewer
collection system annually. The
rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer
infrastructures within the sub-
basin are substandard and
prioritized for improvement. This
project will replace/repair 6 miles
of sewer mains and associated
maintenance holes as well as the
lower sewer laterals located
within right-of-way (ROW).

Project Score: 93

Under the Consent Decree, the
City is mandated to rehabilitate 13
miles of the aging sewer
collection system annually. The
rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer
infrastructures within the sub-
basin are substandard and
prioritized for improvement. This
project will replace/repair 2.88
miles of sewer mains and
associated maintenance holes as
well as the lower sewer laterals
located within right-of-way
(ROW).

Project Score: 93

Under the Consent Decree, the
City is mandated to rehabilitate 13
miles of the aging sewer
collection system annually. The
rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer
infrastructures within the sub-
basin are substandard and
prioritized for improvement. This
project will replace/repair 3.8
miles of sewer mains and
associated maintenance holes as
well as the lower sewer laterals
located within right-of-way
(ROW).
84 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 80-
001
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 81-
001
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 81-
002
Project Score: 97
Under the Consent Decree, the
City is mandated to rehabilitate 13
miles of the aging sewer
collection system annually. The
rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer
infrastructures within the sub-
basin are substandard and
prioritized for improvement. This
project will replace/repair 2 miles
of sewer mains and associated
maintenance holes as well as the
lower sewer laterals located
within right-of-way (ROW).

Project Score: 93

Under the Consent Decree, the
City is mandated to rehabilitate 13
miles of the aging sewer
collection system annually. The
rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer
infrastructures within the sub-
basin are substandard and
prioritized for improvement. This
project will replace/repair 2 miles
of sewer mains and associated
maintenance holes as well as the
lower sewer laterals located
within right-of-way (ROW).

Project Score: 97

Under the Consent Decree, the
City is mandated to rehabilitate 13
miles of the aging sewer
collection system annually. The
rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer
infrastructures within the sub-
basin are substandard and
prioritized for improvement. This
project will replace/repair 5.3
miles of sewer mains and
associated maintenance holes as
well as the lower sewer laterals
located within right-of-way
(ROW).
85 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 83-
201
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 84-
004
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 84-
101
Project Score: 97
Under the Consent Decree, the
City is mandated to rehabilitate 13
miles of the aging sewer
collection system annually. The
rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer
infrastructures within the sub-
basin are substandard and
prioritized for improvement. This
project will replace/repair 1.3
miles of sewer mains and
associated maintenance holes as
well as the lower sewer laterals
located within right-of-way
(ROW).

Project Score: 97

Under the Consent Decree, the
City is mandated to rehabilitate 13
miles of the aging sewer
collection system annually. The
rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer
infrastructures within the sub-
basin are substandard and
prioritized for improvement. This
project will replace/repair 3 miles
of sewer mains and associated
maintenance holes as well as the
lower sewer laterals located
within right-of-way (ROW).

Project Score: 97

Under the Consent Decree, the
City is mandated to rehabilitate 13
miles of the aging sewer
collection system annually. The
rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer
infrastructures within the sub-
basin are substandard and
prioritized for improvement. This
project will replace/repair 2.8
miles of sewer mains and
associated maintenance holes as
well as the lower sewer laterals
located within right-of-way
(ROW).
86 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 84-102 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 85-102 Project Score: 97
Under the Consent Decree, the City is mandated to
rehabilitate 13 miles of the aging sewer collection
system annually. The rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer infrastructures within
the sub-basin are substandard and prioritized for
improvement. This project will replace/repair 3.1
miles of sewer mains and associated maintenance
holes as well as the lower sewer laterals located
within right-of-way (ROW).

Project Score: 97
Under the Consent Decree, the City is mandated to
rehabilitate 13 miles of the aging sewer collection
system annually. The rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer infrastructures within
the sub-basin are substandard and prioritized for
improvement. This project will replace/repair 3.1
miles of sewer mains and associated maintenance
holes as well as the lower sewer laterals located
within right-of-way (ROW).

Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 85-211 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin 85-231 Project Score: 93
Under the Consent Decree, the City is mandated to
rehabilitate 13 miles of the aging sewer collection
system annually. The rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer infrastructures within
the sub-basin are substandard and prioritized for
improvement. This project will replace/repair 3 miles
of sewer mains and associated maintenance holes
as well as the lower sewer laterals located within
right-of-way (ROW).

Project Score: 81
Under the Consent Decree, the City is mandated to
rehabilitate 13 miles of the aging sewer collection
system annually. The rehabilitation is organized at a
sub-basin level, where sewer infrastructures within
the sub-basin are substandard and prioritized for
improvement. This project will replace/repair 4.6
miles of sewer mains and associated maintenance
holes as well as the lower sewer laterals located
within right-of-way (ROW).

Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
87 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Emergency
Sewer
Repairs
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
2,000,000 2026 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater Hotspot
Sewer Repair
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
3,000,000 2026 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Root
Foaming
FY25-27
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
600,000 2026 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
56-02
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
2,950,000 2026 5 Sausal Creek
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
60-03/07
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
4,680,000 2026 2 Rancho San
Antonio
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
81-002
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
4,070,858 2026 5
High Street
and
International
Blvd.

Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-004
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
1,150,000 2026 6 Arroyo Viejo
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-101
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
7,390,000 2026 6 Coliseum &
Hegenberger
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-102
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
6,820,000 2026 6 Coliseum &
Hegenberger
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-211
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
1,700,000 2026 7 Webster
Street
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-231
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
3,575,000 2026 7
Sheffield
Village -
Marlowe
Drive
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Emergency
Sewer
Repairs
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
2,060,000 2027 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater Hotspot
Sewer Repair
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
3,090,000 2027 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Root
Foaming
FY25-27
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
618,000 2027 Citywide Various
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
56-02
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
13,600,000 2027 5 Sausal Creek
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
62-02
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
1,080,000 2027
5 North
Kennedy
Tract
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
80-001
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
570,000 2027 5 St. Elizabeth
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
81-001
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
570,000 2027 5 Fruitvale
Station
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
83-201
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
370,000 2027 6 Seminary
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
84-004
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
6,800,000 2027 6 Arroyo Viejo
88 Category Project Name Department Fund
Number Budget Fiscal
Year
Council
District Location
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-102
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
820,000 2027 7 North
Stonehurst
Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater
Sanitary
Sewer
Rehabilitation
- Sub-Basin
85-211
Public
Works
3100 -
Sewer
Service
Fund
6,800,000 2027 7 Webster
Street
74,313,858
Legend - Sanitary Sewers & Wastewater
Legend Category Project Title Project Number Location
1, 2 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
84-004
1007527 Arroyo Viejo
3, 4 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
85-211
1008042 Webster Street
5, 6 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
56-02
1007528 Sausal Creek
7 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
80-001
1008043 St. Elizabeth
8 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
81-001
1008044 Fruitvale Station
9 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
85-102
1008045 North Stonehurst
10 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
83-201
1008046 Seminary
89 Legend Category Project Title Project Number Location 11 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
62-02
1008047 North Kennedy Tract
12 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
84-102
1007526 Coliseum & Hegenberger
13 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
84-101
1007529 Coliseum & Hegenberger
14 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
60-03 & 60-07
1007530 Rancho San Antonio
15 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
85-231
1006970 Sheffield Village - Marlowe
Drive
16 Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation - Sub-Basin
81-002
1006971 High Street and
International Blvd.
17, 18 Sewer Hotspot Sewer Repair 1008048 Citywide
19, 20 Sewer Emergency Sewer Repairs 1008049 Citywide
21, 22 Sewer Root Foaming FY25-27 1008050 Citywide

90 CHAMBERS LN

SNAKE RD

SARONI DR

VILLANOVA DR

CHAMBERS LN
CASTLE

PARK WAY

LA CUESTA ST

KLAMATH ST

BALMORAL DR

CRESTMONT DR

LEIMERT BLVD VICTOR AVE

LAMMPS PHASE I

HEARST AVE FLORIDA ST

KNOLL AVE
39TH AVE

CASTERLINE RD

WHITTLE AVE

KNOLL AVE

LAGUNA AVE

KELLER AVE

SHETLAND AVE

ELYSIAN

FIELDS DR

STEARNS AVE

EDWARDS AVE

OAK KNOLL
BLVD

EDWARDS AVE

BURR ST

FONTAINE ST

UTAH ST

GRANADA AVE
PLYMOUTH ST87TH AVE

ST ELMO DRTOPANGA DRCATRON DR

ESTEPA DR

ROYAL ST

EDES AVE

WALTER AVE

ASHTON AVE
CARY AVE42ND HIGH ST
I-880 ACCESS

HILLSIDE ST

CAMDEN ST
64TH AVE65TH AVE
83RD AVE81ST AVE
69TH AVE
72ND AVE
63RD AVE

HAVENSCOURT BLVD

HARVEY AVECONGRESS AVE

KINGSLAND AVE

CARRINGTON
ST

FULLINGTON ST

HAROLD ST

GLEASON WAY
24TH AVE
26TH AVE
26TH AVE
11TH AVE
10TH AVE
12TH AVE
4TH AVE

BROOK ST
8TH ST10TH STPINE ST

BENVENUE AVE

REGENT ST

CANNING ST

MILES AVE

APGAR ST
54TH ST

POIRIER ST
44TH ST
43RD ST
36TH ST
46TH ST
61ST ST

JEFFERSON ST

ADELINE ST

POPLAR ST

HOLLIS ST
26TH ST
28TH ST

LOWELL ST
62ND ST
28TH ST
E 21ST ST

SAN ANTONIO WAY
E 15TH ST
52ND AVE

BUCKEYE AVE

HERMOSA AVE

ST PAUL CT

SHERIDAN RD

GRAND VIEW DR

NORTH HILL CT

PENNIMAN AVE

MOUNTAIN
BLVD
29TH AVE

MARR AVE
Berkeley
Emeryville
Piedmont
Alameda
San Leandro
Joaquin Miller
Park
Holy Names
University
Joaquin Miller
Elementary
Oakland
Tech
Claremont
Middle
Skyline High
School
Mills
College
King Estate
Park
Castlemont
High
Merritt Community
College

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

BANCROFT AVE

EDES AVE

FOOTHILL BLVD
E 15TH ST
E 19TH ST

COOLIDGE AVE

COLLEGE AVE

GRAND AVE

OAKLAND AVE

MACARTHUR BLVD

MACARTHUR BLVD

PARK BLVD

WEST ST

ADELINE ST

BROADWAY

OAKPORT ST

COLISEUM WAY

THORNHILL DR

MOUNTAIN
BLVD

MOUNTAIN
BLVD
23RD AVE
37TH AVE
55TH AVE
13TH AVE
98TH AVE
97TH AVE
86TH AVE
76TH AVE
82ND AVE
64TH AVE
61ST AVE
E 28TH STE 30TH ST

FRUITVALE
73RD AVE
102ND AVE104TH AVE
12TH ST
BAY PL
65TH ST

ALCATRAZ AVE
Knowland
Park
E 18TH ST

TELEGRAPH AVE

SNAKE RD
23RD AVEE 9TH ST
109TH AVE
24TH ST
7TH ST
5TH ST12TH ST
10TH ST
14TH ST
14TH ST

W GRAND AVE
42ND ST

HILLSIDE ST

FOOTHILL BLVD

WOOD ST

FRANKLIN STALICE ST

KELLER AVECLAREMONT AVE

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

SAN PABLO AVE
580
80 980
13 880
880
580
24 880
8 10
23 Citywide
9 11
7 17 - 22 Citywide
3-4
12 13
1-2
16 5-6
14 15
24 31 Citywide
25 26
27 28
29 30
32 33
2025-27 Funded Public Work Projects
Sewer and Watershed
Public Works
Department
Parks
Watershed Improvement 2026
Schools
N
Sewer Improvement 2026
Sewer Improvement 2027
Watershed Improvement 2027

CATEGORY OVERVIEW
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Impacts
Installation of Small Trash Capture Devices: To assist with meeting the City’s trash load reduction mandate imposed by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board), General Small Trash Capture Project and associated trash capture implementation projects will install approximately 1900 small trash capture devices. This mandate will increase O&M costs significantly. Approximately 10.5 FTE will be needed by Public Works Infrastructure Maintenance Division to maintain these devices. To maintain the approximately 1900 new small trash capture devices, a one-time capital investment of $3.2 to 4 million is needed for four zero-emissions vehicle Hydro Vactor/flusher trucks to increase the Infrastructure Division’s operational efficiency. Additional operational costs will apply. Installing approximately 1900 small trash capture devices will satisfy Water Board requirements triggered by City of Oakland’s FY24-25 Capital Improvement Program, inclusive of OPW and DOT CIP projects and programs, but will not cover the associated and ongoing O&M costs.

Pump Station Repairs: The O&M costs for a new pump station that replaces an existing facility would not change or may decrease due to fewer mechanical and other issues. A new pump station device would also be more energy efficient which would reduce utility costs.

Storm Drainage Pipe Repairs: The O&M costs associated with a repaired storm drainage pipe/culvert and associated infrastructure, such as manholes and inlets, would not change or would decrease due to fewer urgent repairs and maintenance requests caused by deficiencies.

Large Storm Drainage Improvement Projects: This project is designed to alleviate flooding and thus should decrease O&M costs by increasing the capacity of the storm drainage system to handle larger storms and by reducing the number of street and property flooding events that the City would need to respond to.

ADOPTED 2-YEAR BUDGET
Project Funding
Category 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Storm Drainage & Watershed 5,018,185 16,736,197 21,754,382 TOTAL 5,018,185 16,736,197 21,754,382
Project Fund Source
Storm Drainage & WatershedStorm Drainage & Watershed

Public WorksPublic Works || Citywide Citywide (see map below)(see map below) 91 Funding Source(s)
Fund Number 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5342 - Measure U (Tax Exempt) 2,557,031 14,530,584 17,087,615 2421 - Capital Improvements Impact Fee
Fund 1,435,896 2,205,613 3,641,509
2244 - Measure Q 540,070 0 540,070
532X - Measure DD 485,188 0 485,188
TOTAL 5,018,185 16,736,197 21,754,382

ADOPTED PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS &
SCORES
Beaconsfield Canyon Storm Drain Inlet
Replacement
Bernhardt Drive Storm Drain Improvement Broken Weirs Replacement - 73rd & International Large Capture Trash Device
Project Score: N/A
Replace storm drainage and
enhance creek to protect
infrastructure. Remove hazardous
erosion condition at storm drain
inlet/manhole in Beaconsfield
Canyon Park.

Project Score: 71

Drainage improvements near
Bernhardt Drive to address
flooding as frequent as in a two-
year storm. Early conceptual
project design includes bypass
pipe system from Ghormley
Avenue to the Union Pacific
Railroad (UPRR) along Bernhardt
Drive and then along the UPRR
easement southerly. Design
includes new outfall structure
through which storm water will
discharge into San Leandro
Creek. Bypass pipe system will
travel under the Interstate 880
overpass along the UPRR
easement.

Project Score: N/A

Bendable weirs at 73rd
St./International Blvd. existing
large trash capture device are
stuck in open position but should
collapse downward to allow
floodwater flow downstream.

Project will excavate, shore, and
backfill roadway, modify existing
underground concrete structures,
and replace weirs. Trash capture
device, needed to comply with
City's municipal regional
stormwater permit, requires
partial reconstruction to ensure
proper function.
92 Chelsea Drive at Longcroft Storm Drain Inlet
Improvement
Citywide Storm Drainage Replacement Empire Road Storm Drain Improvement Project Score: N/A
Replace storm drainage inlet on
Chelsea Dr. at Longcroft to
reduce sediment clogging that
has caused significant flooding
and sedimentation of
downstream creek. Two small
creeks converge upstream of
inlet and overwhelm inlet with
sediment during large storms.

Project Score: N/A

Replace storm drainage
infrastructure at various locations
Citywide. City assessing list of
proposed projects and prioritizing
based on risk, equity, and
technical criteria. Projects near/in
creeks require environmental
permits.

Project Score: 67

Drainage Improvements near
Empire Road to address flooding
as frequent as in a two-year
storm. Early conceptual project
design includes a bypass (dual 18”
storm drain pipe system) along
Cairo Road that works with the
existing storm drainage system to
collect and divert flows westward
into channelized waterway.

Would require dredging 700 feet
channel south of Cairo Road to
form a deeper trapezoidal
channel. Alternative will require
routine vegetation clearing to
maintain channel capacity.
93 Glen Echo Creek Restoration High Street Storm Drainage Improvements Rehab Of International Blvd. Storm Drain Culvert
Project Score: 76
The project will restore three
creek sections that flow above-
ground through Oak Glen Park
and a downstream portion of city-
owned land. The creek runs
parallel to Richmond Boulevard
between MacArthur Boulevard
and Frisbee St and then
continues downstream to 29th.

The restoration project will
stabilize and repair steep and
eroding creek banks to protect
property and public roadways,
reduce flood risk, and improve
water quality. The project will also
restore native riparian vegetation
to create habitat and incorporate
park enhancements designed to
connect the community to the
creek in a visually appealing way
to improve recreation and
education opportunities and
reduce illegal dumping .

Project Score: N/A

High Street between Wattling
and Tidewater Avenue - Improve
storm drainage system to prevent
flooding and improve
effectiveness of downstream
trash capture device.

Project Score: 63

Urgent repair of significantly
deteriorated storm drainage
culvert under International
Boulevard between 55th and
62nd Avenues. More than 75% of
the culvert is in poor to severe
condition.
94 Richmond Blvd. Stormwater Culvert Repair Stormwater Capital Improvements Project Score: 67
Urgent stormwater infrastructure repair. Structurally
deteriorated 110-foot reinforced City-owned concrete
box culvert section is located on a private residential property. A 52-foot unreinforced arched culvert
section in poor condition crosses Richmond
Boulevard and discharges into Glen Echo Creek.

Project Score: N/A
Replace storm drainage infrastructure at various
locations Citywide. City assessing list of proposed
projects and prioritizing based on risk, equity, and
technical criteria. Projects near/in creeks require
environmental permits.

Category Project Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal Year
Council
District Location
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Beaconsfield
Canyon Storm
Drain Inlet
Replacement
& Creek
Enhancement
Public
Works
2244 -
Measure Q 109,375 2026 4 Beaconsfield
Canyon Park
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Bernhardt
Drive Storm
Drainage
Improvement
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
2,062,500 2027 7
Bernhardt
Dr. from
Ghormley
Avenue to
Union
Pacific
Railroad
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Broken Weirs
Replacement
- 73rd and
International
Large Trash
Capture
Device
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,729,021 2027 6
73rd Ave &
International
Blvd.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
Chelsea Drive
at Longcroft
Storm Drain
Inlet
Improvement
Public
Works
2244 -
Measure Q 190,497 2026 4
SD Inlet on
Chelsea
Drive at
Longcroft
Drive
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Citywide
Storm
Drainage
Replacement
(eg. Joaquin
Miller Park
Storm Drain,
Moraga Ave
and Masonic
Ave Storm
Drain)
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,000,000 2027 Citywide Various
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Empire Road
Storm Drain
Improvement
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,443,750 2026 7
Empire
Road
between
Cairo Rd &
Tunis Rd
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Glen Echo
Creek
Restoration
Public
Works
532X -
Measure DD 485,188 2026 7
Croxton
Avenue &
Richmond
Blvd.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
High Street
Storm
Drainage
Improvements
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
1,113,281 2026 5 & 6
High Street
between
Wattling St.
and
Tidewater
Ave
95 Category Project Name Department Fund Number Budget Fiscal Year
Council
District Location
Storm Drainage & Watershed
High Street
Storm
Drainage
Improvements
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
4,687,500 2027 5 & 6
High Street
between
Wattling St.
and
Tidewater
Ave
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Rehab Storm
Drain under
International
Blvd. between
57th and 62nd
Avenues
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
351,563 2027 6
Under
International
Blvd from
57th to 62nd
Avenues.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
Richmond
Blvd. Culvert
Repair
Public
Works
2244 -
Measure Q 240,198 2026 3
3021
Richmond
Blvd.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
Richmond
Blvd. Culvert
Repair
Public
Works
5342 -
Measure U
(Tax Exempt)
4,700,000 2027 3
3021
Richmond
Blvd.

Storm Drainage & Watershed
Stormwater
Capital
Improvements
Public
Works
2421 - Capital
Improvements
Impact Fee
Fund
1,435,896 2026 Citywide Various
Storm Drainage & Watershed
Stormwater
Capital
Improvements
Public
Works
2421 - Capital
Improvements
Impact Fee
Fund
2,205,613 2027 Citywide Various
21,754,382
Legend - Storm Drainage & Watershed
Legend Category Project Title Project
Number Location
23 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
Citywide Storm Drainage
Replacement/Stormwater
Capital Improvements
1008053 Citywide
24 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
High Street Storm
Drainage Improvements 1008055
High Street between
Wattling St. and
Tidewater Ave
96 Legend Category Project Title Project
Number Location
25 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
Chelsea Drive at
Longcroft Storm Drain
Inlet Improvement
1007235 Inlet on Chelsea Drive
at Longcroft Drive
26 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
Beaconsfield Canyon
Storm Drain Inlet
Replacement & Creek
Enhancement
1008054 Beaconsfield Canyon
Park
27 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
Empire Road Storm
Drain Improvement 1007056
Empire Road
between Cairo Rd &
Tunis Rd
28 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
Glen Echo Creek
Restoration 1006070 Croxton Avenue &
Richmond Blvd.
29 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
Richmond Blvd. Culvert
Repair 1006261 3021 Richmond Blvd.
30 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
Bernhardt Drive Storm
Drainage Improvement 1007055
Bernhardt Dr. from
Ghormley Avenue to
Union Pacific
Railroad
32 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
Rehab Storm Drain
under International Blvd.
between 57th and 62nd
Avenues
1007057
Under International
Blvd from 57th to
62nd Avenues
33 Storm Drainage &
Watershed
Replace Broken Weirs -
73rd and International
Large Trash Capture
Device
1008057 73rd Ave &
International Blvd.

97 CHAMBERS LN

SNAKE RD

SARONI DR

VILLANOVA DR

CHAMBERS LN
CASTLE

PARK WAY

LA CUESTA ST

KLAMATH ST

BALMORAL DR

CRESTMONT DR

LEIMERT BLVD VICTOR AVE

LAMMPS PHASE I

HEARST AVE FLORIDA ST

KNOLL AVE
39TH AVE

CASTERLINE RD

WHITTLE AVE

KNOLL AVE

LAGUNA AVE

KELLER AVE

SHETLAND AVE

ELYSIAN

FIELDS DR

STEARNS AVE

EDWARDS AVE

OAK KNOLL
BLVD

EDWARDS AVE

BURR ST

FONTAINE ST

UTAH ST

GRANADA AVE
PLYMOUTH ST87TH AVE

ST ELMO DRTOPANGA DRCATRON DR

ESTEPA DR

ROYAL ST

EDES AVE

WALTER AVE

ASHTON AVE
CARY AVE42ND HIGH ST
I-880 ACCESS

HILLSIDE ST

CAMDEN ST
64TH AVE65TH AVE
83RD AVE81ST AVE
69TH AVE
72ND AVE
63RD AVE

HAVENSCOURT BLVD

HARVEY AVECONGRESS AVE

KINGSLAND AVE

CARRINGTON
ST

FULLINGTON ST

HAROLD ST

GLEASON WAY
24TH AVE
26TH AVE
26TH AVE
11TH AVE
10TH AVE
12TH AVE
4TH AVE

BROOK ST
8TH ST10TH STPINE ST

BENVENUE AVE

REGENT ST

CANNING ST

MILES AVE

APGAR ST
54TH ST

POIRIER ST
44TH ST
43RD ST
36TH ST
46TH ST
61ST ST

JEFFERSON ST

ADELINE ST

POPLAR ST

HOLLIS ST
26TH ST
28TH ST

LOWELL ST
62ND ST
28TH ST
E 21ST ST

SAN ANTONIO WAY
E 15TH ST
52ND AVE

BUCKEYE AVE

HERMOSA AVE

ST PAUL CT

SHERIDAN RD

GRAND VIEW DR

NORTH HILL CT

PENNIMAN AVE

MOUNTAIN
BLVD
29TH AVE

MARR AVE
Berkeley
Emeryville
Piedmont
Alameda
San Leandro
Joaquin Miller
Park
Holy Names
University
Joaquin Miller
Elementary
Oakland
Tech
Claremont
Middle
Skyline High
School
Mills
College
King Estate
Park
Castlemont
High
Merritt Community
College

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

BANCROFT AVE

EDES AVE

FOOTHILL BLVD
E 15TH ST
E 19TH ST

COOLIDGE AVE

COLLEGE AVE

GRAND AVE

OAKLAND AVE

MACARTHUR BLVD

MACARTHUR BLVD

PARK BLVD

WEST ST

ADELINE ST

BROADWAY

OAKPORT ST

COLISEUM WAY

THORNHILL DR

MOUNTAIN
BLVD

MOUNTAIN
BLVD
23RD AVE
37TH AVE
55TH AVE
13TH AVE
98TH AVE
97TH AVE
86TH AVE
76TH AVE
82ND AVE
64TH AVE
61ST AVE
E 28TH STE 30TH ST

FRUITVALE
73RD AVE
102ND AVE104TH AVE
12TH ST
BAY PL
65TH ST

ALCATRAZ AVE
Knowland
Park
E 18TH ST

TELEGRAPH AVE

SNAKE RD
23RD AVEE 9TH ST
109TH AVE
24TH ST
7TH ST
5TH ST12TH ST
10TH ST
14TH ST
14TH ST

W GRAND AVE
42ND ST

HILLSIDE ST

FOOTHILL BLVD

WOOD ST

FRANKLIN STALICE ST

KELLER AVECLAREMONT AVE

INTERNATIONAL BLVD

SAN PABLO AVE
580
80 980
13 880
880
580
24 880
8 10
23 Citywide
9 11
7 17 - 22 Citywide
3-4
12 13
1-2
16 5-6
14 15
24 31 Citywide
25 26
27 28
29 30
32 33
2025-27 Funded Public Work Projects
Sewer and Watershed
Public Works
Department
Parks
Watershed Improvement 2026
Schools
N
Sewer Improvement 2026
Sewer Improvement 2027
Watershed Improvement 2027