Agenda packet — Ontario City Council, April 19, 2022 (part 2 of 12)

EXHIBIT A— PROJECT LOCATION MAP
261
Amendment to Piemonte Overlay – Report Exhibits
File No.: PSPA21-001
April 19, 2022

Page 2 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT B— SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USE
Existing Land Use General Plan
Designation Zoning Designation Specific Plan Land Use
Site Office, Commercial,
Arena, Hotel, Vacant Mixed Use
Piemonte Overlay of the
Ontario Center Specific
Plan
Mixed-use, Office,
Residential,
Commercial, Special
Use
North
Industrial, Office,
Commercial,
Residential, Vacant
(City of Rancho
Cucamonga)
Industrial Park, Mixed
Use, Open Space
(City of Rancho
Cucamonga)
Industrial Park, Mixeduse Retail, IASP SubArea 18 Specific Plan (City of Rancho
Cucamonga)
Mixed Use, Village
Neighborhood
South Office, Commercial,
Vacant Mixed Use The Ontario Center Specific Plan
Urban Commercial,
Garden Commercial,
Open Space
East Commercial Mixed Use The Ontario Center
Specific Plan Urban Commercial
West Residential, Commercial High Density Residential,
Office Commercial
The Ontario Center
Specific Plan Urban Commercial
262
Amendment to Piemonte Overlay – Report Exhibits
File No.: PSPA21-001
April 19, 2022

Page 3 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT C—EXISTING BOUNDARY AND LAND USE MAP
263
Amendment to Piemonte Overlay – Report Exhibits
File No.: PSPA21-001
April 19, 2022

Page 4 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT D—PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND LAND USE MAP
264
Amendment to Piemonte Overlay – Report Exhibits
File No.: PSPA21-001
April 19, 2022

Page 5 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT E—EXISTING AND PROPOSED SUBAREAS
Existing
Proposed
Addition to Overlay
Project Area
265
Case Planner: Edmelynne V. Hutter, AICP Hearing Body Date Decision Action Planning Director
Approval:

DAB N/A N/A N/A
PC 3/22/2022 Recommend
Submittal Date: N/A CC TBD Final
FILE NO: PSPA21-001
SUBJECT: A public hearing to consider an Amendment to the Piemonte Overlay at Ontario Center Specific Plan, including [1] revising the overlay boundary to add approximately 24.9 acres, comprising of the property located at 4000 Ontario Center Parkway, to the overlay area, [2] changing the land use designation on approximately

4.9 acres of land from Office and Entertainment/Retail to Mixed Use, in an area bounded by Fourth Street to the north, Concours Street and Ontario Center Parkway to the south, Via Alba to the east, and the Camden Landmark Apartment and vacant land to the west, and [3] establishing development standards and design guidelines for the Mixed Use land use area within the Piemonte Overlay at Ontario Center Specific Plan; (APN(s):
0210-204-12, 0210-204-13, 0210-204-14, 0210-204-15, 0210-204-17, 0210-204-18, 0210-204- 20, 0210-204-21, 0210-204-22, 0210-204-23, 0210-204-23, 0210-204-24, 0210-204-25, 0210- 204-26, 0210-204-28, 0210-204-36, 0210-204-37, 0210-204-37, 0210-204-38, 0210-204-39, 0210-204-40, 0210-204-41, 0210-531-06, 0210-531-07, 0210-531-08, 0210-531-09, 0210-531- 10, 0210-231-11, 0210-231-12, 0210-231-13, 0210-231-14, 0210-231-15, 0210-231-16, and 0210-205-01). City initiated. City Council action required.

PROPERTY OWNERS: Lewis Piemonte Land LLC; San Juan Owners LLC; Piemonte on 4th LLC; SL & C Ontario LLC; SMG; LCD Residential at Ontario, LLC; Dekalb Properties LLC; Target Corporation; Ontario Covenant Group LLC; City of Ontario RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Planning Commission consider and recommend that the City Council approve the use of an Addendum to The Ontario Center Environmental Impact Report (State Clearing House No. 89041009) and approve the amendment to the Piemonte Overlay at The Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No. PSPA21-001), pursuant to the facts and reasons contained in the staff report and attached resolutions.

PROJECT SETTING: The Project site is comprised of 119.8 acres of land located at the northerly boundary of the City of Ontario, south of Fourth Street, east of Haven Avenue, west of Milliken Avenue, and north of Concours Street, within the Piemonte Overlay at The Ontario Center Specific Plan and The Ontario Center Specific Plan zoning districts, and is depicted in Figure 1: Project Location, below. The Project site is surrounded by residential, office, and commercial properties on land that is generally topographically flat. In addition to the existing surrounding developments, there are also vacant parcels along the Project boundary. The existing surrounding land uses, zoning, and general plan 303 East B Street, Ontario, California 91764 Phone: 909.395.2036 / Fax: 909.395.2420

PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
March 22, 2022
266
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 2 of 17 ends

and specific plan land use designations are summarized in the “Surrounding Zoning & Land Uses” table located in the Technical Appendix of this report.

PROJECT ANALYSIS:
(1) Background — In 2006, the City Council approved the creation of the Piemonte Overlay at The Ontario Center Specific Plan (“Piemonte Overlay”) within the Urban Commercial land use district of The Ontario Center Specific Plan, establishing a master plan for the development of approximately 1.3 million square feet of retail, office, hotel, and entertainment uses, and more than 800 multiple-family dwelling units on the 84-acre Project site. The Piemonte Overlay was delineated into fifteen subareas, with land use designations of Commercial, Entertainment/Retail, Office, Special Use and Residential (See Exhibit B, Existing Boundary and Land Use Map, attached). The current Overlay area covers approximately 92 acres of land, with at least 48 acres being vacant land.

In 2017, the City Council approved an amendment to the Piemonte Overlay document (File No. PSPA16-003) to reduce the number of residential units, reduce the maximum number of hotel rooms, designate plaza areas to accommodate outdoor events, and expand the design concept from the original Tuscan-influenced architecture to allow more contemporary architectural design concepts.

In 2020, the City Council approved an amendment to the Piemonte Overlay document (File No. PSPA19-009) to allow required residential parking spaces to be provided as tandem parking spaces.

Figure 1: Project Location
267
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 3 of 17 ends

The City of Ontario Economic Development Department and a land developer are coordinating to bring a mixed-use development adjacent to the Toyota Arena. The proposed Amendment to the Piemonte Overlay of the Ontario Center Specific Plan would help facilitate the development of underutilized and vacant parcels. (2) Specific Plan Amendment — The proposed Amendment to the Piemonte Overlay at the Ontario Center Specific Plan (“Overlay Amendment”) is focused on incorporating more opportunities for vibrant, mixed-use developments that allow for entertainment, dining and housing. The Overlay Amendment would expand the Project boundary, revise the Entertainment/Retail land use designation to Mixed-Use, establish new development standards and guidelines for mixed-use developments, and implement associated minor text amendments. The proposed boundary and land use plan are provided in Exhibit C, Proposed Boundary and Land Use Map, attached. A “track-changes” document has been prepared that shows the proposed changes in the Piemonte Overlay at The Ontario Center Specific Plan, which is attached to the Specific Plan Amendment action resolution provided with this report.
(a) Overlay Boundary Expansion – The Piemonte Overlay boundary would be expanded to include the property located at 4000 Ontario Center Parkway, which is developed with the Toyota Arena sports and entertainment venue and surrounding parking lots. This additional land area is comprised of 24.9 acres of land, which would be delineated into four new subareas and designated with the Mixed-Use land use. The new proposed Subareas (“SA”) include SA16, SA17, SA18, and SA19 (See Exhibit D, Existing and Proposed Subareas, attached). SA18 is developed with the Toyota Arena building and the other three areas are developed with parking lots. The Overlay Amendment anticipates that SA16 and SA17 will be developed with service commercial uses on the ground floor and multiple-family residential complexes on the upper floors. (b) Land Use Plan / Mixed-use Land Use – In addition to expanding the Piemonte Overlay boundary, the areas currently designated as Entertainment/Retail would be recategorized as Mixed-Use, which would allow for residential uses in addition to commercial uses. It is anticipated that SA8 and SA11 (See Exhibit D, Existing and Proposed Subareas, attached) will be developed with ground floor retail and residential units above. The incorporation of residential uses into these areas introduces a use not previously anticipated and requires analysis of potential impacts to infrastructure and services. Therefore, an Addendum to The Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 89041009) was prepared and will be discussed further in this report. In summary, the Addendum analyses the future development of 691 residential units and approximately 71,000 square feet of retail space. The development plan review for the residential and retail uses will be processed in future Development Plan applications.

Land use revisions proposed in the Overlay Amendment involve changing areas currently designated as Entertainment/Retail, to Mixed-Use. The revision affects Subareas 8 and 11, 268
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 4 of 17 ends

as well as new Subareas 16, 17, 18, and 19. The Mixed-Use land use designation allows for residential, entertainment, retail, dining, and other commercial uses. (c) Development Standards and Guidelines – The Overlay Amendment will establish development standards and guidelines for the Mixed-Use areas, which address site and building designs that can successfully blend residential and commercial uses with pedestrian oriented spaces, providing opportunities for service commercial uses within proximity to residential uses and a large entertainment venue.

The Overlay Amendment incorporates various standards and guidelines that address elements such as site plan design, building design, building materials, parking structures, plaza areas, signage, residential open spaces, and parking requirements.

The development standards for Mixed-Use areas require 15-foot building setbacks along the private streets, as measured from the curb face, to allow for pedestrian oriented corridors. The setback requirements, however, do allow flexibility along Via Piemonte in that the building setbacks can be as little as 5 feet from curb face if an average 15-foot setback is provided along the building frontage. The setback flexibility along Via Piemonte will allow variations in building façades and footprint in order to create pedestrian spaces that are ideal for outdoor activities such as dining, people watching, and shopping.

Development standards for Mixed-Use areas include requirements for private and common open space for residential developments, mandating a minimum 50 square feet of private open space per dwelling unit and a minimum 150 square feet per dwelling unit for common open space.

The design guidelines address design goals for mixed-use developments. The Contemporary architectural style, for instance, can give architects and designers flexibility and creative leeway to design a truly unique and successful mixed-use project that can accommodate residential living, entertainment and dining experiences, and opportunities for retail businesses.

The Overlay Amendment includes the addition of design guidelines for parking structures in anticipation of future parking structures to support higher levels of residential and commercial activities than what currently exists. The design guidelines encourage parking structure designs that are compatible with surrounding buildings, aesthetically pleasing, safe for pedestrians, and visually unobtrusive. (3) Circulation Concept — The overall circulation concept in the Piemonte Overlay remains largely unchanged. The Piemonte Overlay area is accessed from the surrounding public streets: Haven Avenue, Fourth Street, Milliken Avenue, Concours Street and Ontario Center Parkway. Internal circulation is provided through the existing private streets: Via Piemonte, Via Villagio, Via Asti and Via Alba. 269
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 5 of 17 ends

The Overlay Amendment envisions that the main retail and mixed-use corridor will be oriented in a north-south direction, along Via Piemonte, instead of the east-west Via Villagio, as shown in the current Piemonte Overlay concept. The north-south orientation will make Via Piemonte, a private street, as the primary north access point from Fourth Street and will terminate at Ontario Center Parkway to the south. A pedestrian corridor along Via Piemonte will continue south of Ontario Center Parkway as a pedestrian-only area that connects to the Toyota Arena, future service commercial uses, and residential uses.

The Circulation Concept, including the street plans and sections shown as Figures in the Overlay Amendment, are considered conceptual in nature and final street designs may have minor variations from these Figures as development plan applications and designs are refined.
(4) Landscaping — The landscape and streetscape design guidelines have been revised to reflect new streetscape requirements along the internal private streets.

Primarily, the Via Piemonte streetscape design was revised to be the main pedestrian and passenger vehicle corridor for the mixed-use development, with curb-adjacent parkway landscape areas and wider pedestrian walkways.

Streetscape designs along Fourth Street, Concours Street, and Ontario Center Parkway remain largely the same, with the exception of a new drop-off and pick-up zone on the south side of Ontario Center Parkway, at the Via Piemonte intersection and just north of the Toyota Arena building. This new zone would allow for taxi or car-service drop-off and pick-up, providing a convenient arrival/departure point for visitors to the mixed-use areas and the Arena.
(5) Infrastructure and Services — The proposed Overlay Amendment does not propose specific changes in the infrastructure and services in relation to the Mixed-use land use designation. As part of the development plan review process, infrastructure demand and capacity of future projects will be analyzed during the planning entitlement process. Specific requirements in infrastructure sizing, location, etc. will be addressed in the development plan design and conditions of approval. (6) Signage — The Piemonte Overlay requires that development projects prepare a Master Sign Program for the development prior to installing any identification or business signage. In addition to the current sign requirements and guidelines in the Piemonte Overlay, the proposed Overlay Amendment includes a section on Digital Advertising Signs and would limit such signs to the pedestrian corridor area east of the Arena building.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE ONTARIO PLAN: The proposed Project is consistent with the principles, goals and policies contained within the Vision, Governance, Policy Plan (General Plan), and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan (TOP). More specifically, the goals and policies of TOP that are furthered by the proposed Project are as follows:
270
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 6 of 17 ends

(1) City Council Goals.
 Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City’s Economy  Operate in a Businesslike Manner
 Focus Resources in Ontario’s Commercial and Residential Neighborhoods (2) Vision.

Distinctive Development:
 Commercial and Residential Development
 Development quality that is broadly recognized as distinctive and not exclusively tied to the general suburban character typical of much of Southern California. (3) Governance.

Decision Making:
 Goal G1: Sustained decision-making that consistently moves Ontario towards its Vision by using The Ontario Plan as a framework for assessing choices.  G1-2 Long-term Benefit. We require decisions to demonstrate and document how they add value to the community and support the Ontario Vision (4) Policy Plan (General Plan)
Land Use Element:
 Goal LU1: A community that has a spectrum of housing types and price ranges that match the jobs in the City and that make it possible for people to live and work in Ontario and maintain a quality of life.
 LU1-1 Strategic Growth. We concentrate growth in strategic locations that help create place and identity, maximize available and planned infrastructure, and foster the development of transit.
 LU1-6 Complete Community: We incorporate a variety of land uses and building types in our land use planning efforts that result in a complete community where residents at all stages of life, employers, workers and visitors have a wide spectrum of choices of where they can live, work, shop and recreate within Ontario. (Refer to Complete Community Section of Community Economics Element).  Goal LU2: Compatibility between a wide range of uses. 271
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 7 of 17 ends

 LU2-6: Infrastructure Compatibility: We require infrastructure to be aesthetically pleasing and in context with the community character.  Goal LU3: Staff, regulations and processes that support and allow flexible response to conditions and circumstances in order to achieve the vision.  LU3-1: Development Standards: We maintain clear development standards which allow flexibility to achieve our Vision.
 LU3-3: Land Use Flexibility: We consider uses not typically permitted within a land use category if doing so improves livability, reduces vehicular trips, creates community gathering places and activity nodes, and helps create identity.

Housing Element:
 Goal H2: Diversity of types of quality housing that are affordable to a range of household income levels, accommodate changing demographics, and support and reinforce the economic sustainability of Ontario.
 H2-3 Ontario Airport Metro Center. We foster a vibrant, urban, intense and highly amenitized community in the Ontario Airport Metro Center Area through a mix of residential, entertainment, retail and office-oriented uses.  H2-5 Housing Design. We require architectural excellence through adherence to City design guidelines, thoughtful site planning, environmentally sustainable practices and other best practices.
 H2-6 Infill Development. We support the revitalization of neighborhoods through the construction of higher-density residential developments on underutilized residential and commercial sites.
 Goal H3: A City regulatory environment that balances the need for creativity and excellence in residential design, flexibility and predictability in the project approval process, and the provision of an adequate supply and prices of housing.  H3-2 Flexible Standards. We allow flexibility in the application of residential and mixed-use development standards in order to gain benefits such as exceptional design quality, economic advantages, sustainability, or other benefits that would otherwise be unrealized.
 Goal H5: A full range of housing types and community services that meet the special housing needs for all individuals and families in Ontario, regardless of income level, age or other status.
272
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 8 of 17 ends

 H5-2 Family Housing. We support the development of larger rental apartments that are appropriate for families with children, including, as feasible, the provision of services, recreation and other amenities.

Community Economics Element:
 Goal CE1: A complete community that provides for all incomes and stages of life.
 CE1-6 Diversity of Housing. We collaborate with residents, housing providers and the development community to provide housing opportunities for every stage of life; we plan for a variety of housing types and price points to support our workforce, attract business and foster a balanced community.
 Goal CE2: A City of distinctive neighborhoods, districts, and corridors, where people choose to be.
 CE2-1 Development Projects. We require new development and redevelopment to create unique, high-quality places that add value to the community.  CE2-2 Development Review. We require those proposing new development and redevelopment to demonstrate how their projects will create appropriately unique, functional and sustainable places that will compete well with their competition within the region.
 CE2-4 Protection of Investment. We require that new development and redevelopment protect existing investment by providing architecture and urban design of equal or greater quality.
 CE2-5 Private Maintenance. We require adequate maintenance, upkeep, and investment in private property because proper maintenance on private property protects property values.

Safety Element:
 Goal S1: Minimized risk of injury, loss of life, property damage and economic and social disruption caused by earthquake-induced and other geologic hazards.  S1-1 Implementation of Regulations and Standards. We require that all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the most recent California Building Code adopted by the City, including provisions regarding lateral forces and grading.

Community Design Element:
273
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 9 of 17 ends

 Goal CD1: A dynamic, progressive city containing distinct neighborhoods and commercial districts that foster a positive sense of identity and belonging among residents, visitors, and businesses.
 CD1-1 City Identity. We take actions that are consistent with the City being a leading urban center in Southern California while recognizing the diverse character of our existing viable neighborhoods.
 CD1-2 Growth Areas. We require development in growth areas to be distinctive and unique places within which there are cohesive design themes.  Goal CD2: A high level of design quality resulting in public spaces, streetscapes, and developments that are attractive, safe, functional and distinct.  CD2-1 Quality Architecture. We encourage all development projects to convey visual interest and character through:
• Building volume, massing, and height to provide appropriate scale and proportion;
• A true architectural style which is carried out in plan, section and elevation through all aspects of the building and site design and appropriate for its setting; and
• Exterior building materials that are visually interesting, high quality, durable, and appropriate for the architectural style.
 CD2-2 Neighborhood Design. We create distinct residential neighborhoods that are functional, have a sense of community, emphasize livability and social interaction, and are uniquely identifiable places through such elements as:
• A pattern of smaller, walkable blocks that promote access, activity and safety;
• Variable setbacks and parcel sizes to accommodate a diversity of housing types;
• Traffic calming measures to slow traffic and promote walkability while maintaining acceptable fire protection and traffic flows; • Floor plans that encourage views onto the street and de-emphasize the visual and physical dominance of garages (introducing the front porch as the “outdoor living room”), as appropriate; and
• Landscaped parkways, with sidewalks separated from the curb.  CD2-4 Mixed Use, Urban Office and Transit Service Areas. We require mixed use, urban office and transit service areas to be designed and developed as pedestrian oriented “villages” that promote a vibrant, comfortable and functional environment. 274
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 10 of 17 ends

 CD2-7 Sustainability. We collaborate with the development community to design and build neighborhoods, streetscapes, sites, outdoor spaces, landscaping and buildings to reduce energy demand through solar orientation, maximum use of natural daylight, passive solar and natural ventilation, building form, mechanical and structural systems, building materials and construction techniques.  CD2-8 Safe Design. We incorporate defensible space design into new and existing developments to ensure the maximum safe travel and visibility on pathways, corridors, and open space and at building entrances and parking areas by avoiding physically and visually isolated spaces, maintenance of visibility and accessibility, and use of lighting.
 CD2-9 Landscape Design. We encourage durable landscaping materials and designs that enhance the aesthetics of structures, create and define public and private spaces, and provide shade and environmental benefits.  CD2-10 Surface Parking Areas. We require parking areas visible to or used by the public to be landscaped in an aesthetically pleasing, safe and environmentally sensitive manner. Examples include shade trees, pervious surfaces, urban run-off capture and infiltration, and pedestrian paths to guide users through the parking field.  CD2-11 Entry Statements. We encourage the inclusion of amenities, signage and landscaping at the entry to neighborhoods, commercial centers, mixed use areas, industrial developments, and public places that reinforce them as uniquely identifiable places.
 CD2-12 Site and Building Signage. We encourage the use of sign programs that utilize complementary materials, colors, and themes. Project signage should be designed to effectively communicate and direct users to various aspects of the development and complement the character of the structures.  CD2-13 Entitlement Process. We work collaboratively with all stakeholders to ensure a high degree of certainty in the efficient review and timely processing of all development plans and permits.
 Goal CD3: Vibrant urban environments that are organized around intense buildings, pedestrian and transit areas, public plazas, and linkages between and within developments that are conveniently located, visually appealing and safe during all hours.
 CD3-1 Design. We require that pedestrian, vehicular, bicycle and equestrian circulation on both public and private property be coordinated and designed to maximize safety, comfort and aesthetics.
275
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 11 of 17 ends

 CD3-2 Connectivity Between Streets, Sidewalks, Walkways and Plazas. We require landscaping and paving be used to optimize visual connectivity between streets, sidewalks, walkways and plazas for pedestrians.
 CD3-3 Building Entrances. We require all building entrances to be accessible and visible from adjacent streets, sidewalks or public open spaces.  CD3-5 Paving. We require sidewalks and road surfaces to be of a type and quality that contributes to the appearance and utility of streets and public spaces.  CD3-6 Landscaping. We utilize landscaping to enhance the aesthetics, functionality and sustainability of streetscapes, outdoor spaces and buildings.  Goal CD5: A sustained level of maintenance and improvement of properties, buildings and infrastructure that protects the property values and encourages additional public and private investments.
 CD5-1 Maintenance of Buildings and Property. We require all public and privately owned buildings and property (including trails and easements) to be properly and consistently maintained.
 CD5-2 Maintenance of Infrastructure. We require the continual maintenance of infrastructure.

HOUSING ELEMENT COMPLIANCE: The Project is consistent with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan (General Plan) component of The Ontario Plan. The Project site contains four properties listed in the Available Land Inventory contained in Table A-3 (Available Land by Planning Area) of the Housing Element Technical Report Appendix. The proposed changes affect two of the four properties listed in the Available Land Inventory (Subareas 8 and 11; Map ID No. 124 and 125). The residential capacity proposed in this Project is consistent with the number of dwelling units (198) and density (48 DU/AC) specified in the Available Land Inventory.

AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY PLAN (ALUCP) COMPLIANCE: The California State Aeronautics Act (Public Utilities Code Section 21670 et seq.) requires that an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan be prepared for all public use airports in the State; and requires that local land use plans and individual development proposals must be consistent with the policies set forth in the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. On April 19, 2011, the City Council of the City of Ontario approved and adopted the Ontario International Airport Land use Compatibility Plan (“ALUCP”), establishing the Airport Influence Area for Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and limits future land uses and development within the Airport Influence Area, as they relate to noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity. The proposed Project is located 276
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 12 of 17 ends

within the Airport Influence Area of Ontario International Airport and was evaluated and found to be consistent with the policies and criteria of the ALUCP.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: In 1980, the City Council certified The Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearing House No. 80062538), in relation to the adoption of The Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No. 2254-SP) (“OCSP”), which was adopted in 1981. Over the years, several amendments to the OCSP have been approved along with appropriate environmental review. On March 19, 1991, a subsequent EIR (State Clearing House No. 89041009) (“Certified EIR”) was certified in association with an amendment to the OCSP (File No. 4059-SPA). In 2016, the City approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) in association with an amendment to the Piemonte Overlay (File No. PSPA16-003).

In association with the proposed Overlay Amendment, staff collaborated with consultant Kimley-Horn to prepare an Addendum to the Certified EIR, as amended, and found that all potential adverse direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts were thoroughly analyzed and discussed in the Certified EIR, as amended, including, but not limited to potential aesthetic, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, transportation and tribal cultural resources impacts, and all feasible mitigation has been identified and will be incorporated into the proposed Project. This Project does not contemplate any actions that would require the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental environmental document under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 or 15163, as it is consistent with the development scenario identified within the Certified EIR. Furthermore, this Project introduces no new significant environmental impacts and no further environmental review is required. A copy of the Addendum and previous MND Mitigation Measures table are included as attachments to the environmental action resolution provided with this report.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Overlay Amendment is City-initiated and no conditions of approval are associated with this Project.
277
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 13 of 17 ends

TECHNICAL APPENDIX:

Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:

Existing Land Use General Plan
Designation Zoning Designation Specific Plan Land Use
Site Office, Commercial,
Arena, Hotel, Vacant Mixed Use
Piemonte Overlay of the
Ontario Center Specific
Plan
Mixed-use, Office,
Residential,
Commercial, Special
Use
North
Industrial, Office,
Commercial,
Residential, Vacant
(City of Rancho
Cucamonga)
Industrial Park, Mixed
Use, Open Space
(City of Rancho
Cucamonga)
Industrial Park, Mixeduse Retail, IASP SubArea 18 Specific Plan (City of Rancho
Cucamonga)
Mixed Use, Village
Neighborhood
South Office, Commercial,
Vacant Mixed Use The Ontario Center Specific Plan
Urban Commercial,
Garden Commercial,
Open Space
East Commercial Mixed Use The Ontario Center
Specific Plan Urban Commercial
West Residential, Commercial High Density Residential,
Office Commercial
The Ontario Center
Specific Plan Urban Commercial
278
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 14 of 17 ends

EXHIBIT A—PROJECT LOCATION MAP
279
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 15 of 17 ends

EXHIBIT B—EXISTING BOUNDARY AND LAND USE MAP
280
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 16 of 17 ends

EXHIBIT C—PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND LAND USE MAP
281
Planning Commission Staff Report
File No.: PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 17 of 17 ends

EXHIBIT D—EXISTING AND PROPOSED SUBAREAS
Existing
Proposed
Addition to Overlay
Project Area
282
RESOLUTION NO. PC22-014

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

ONTARIO APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE ONTARIO CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, PURSUANT TO

THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT, AS AMENDED, FOR FILE NO. PSPA21-001.

WHEREAS, the City of Ontario (hereinafter referred to as "City") has initiated a Specific Plan Amendment, File No. PSPA21-001, which consists of an Amendment to the Piemonte Overlay of the Ontario Center Specific Plan, in the City of Ontario, California (hereinafter referred to as "Application" or "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 89041009) was certified on March 19, 1991, (hereinafter referred to as “Certified EIR”), in which development and use of the Project site was discussed in the Amendment to the Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No. 4059-SPA); and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was subsequently adopted on May 16, 2017, (hereinafter referred to as “MND”), in which development and use of the Project site was discussed in association with an Amendment to the Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No. PSPA16-003); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director of the City of Ontario has prepared and approved for attachment to the certified EIR and adopted MND, an Addendum to the Certified EIR and MND (hereinafter collectively referred to as “EIR Addendum”) in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, together with State and local guidelines implementing said Act, all as amended to date (collectively referred to as “CEQA”); and
WHEREAS, the EIR Addendum concluded that implementation of the Project could result in a number of significant effects on the environment that were previously analyzed in the Certified EIR and MND, and that the Certified EIR and MND identified mitigation measures that would reduce each of those significant effects to a less-thansignificant level; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a), a lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary to a project, but the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b), an addendum to an adopted MND may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary but the preparation of a subsequent EIR or MND is not required; and 283
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, the City determined that none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or MND would occur from the Project, and that preparation of an Addendum to the Certified EIR and MND was appropriate; and WHEREAS, the City of Ontario is the lead agency on the Project, and the Planning Commission is the recommending authority for the requested approval to undertake the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the EIR Addendum for the Project, has concluded that none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent of supplemental EIR or MND have occurred, and intends to take actions on the Project in compliance with CEQA and state and local guidelines implementing CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the EIR Addendum for the Project is on file in the Planning Department, located at 303 East B Street, Ontario, CA 91764, is available for inspection by any interested person at that location and are, by this reference, incorporated into this Resolution as if fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED, AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario, as follows:

SECTION 1: Environmental Determination and Findings. As the recommending authority for the Project, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the administrative record for the Project. Based upon the facts and information contained in the administrative record, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
(1) The environmental impacts of this project were reviewed in conjunction with an Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 89041009), certified by the Ontario City Council on March 19, 1991, in conjunction with File No. 4059-SPA; and
(2) The environmental impacts of this project were reviewed in conjunction with a Mitigated Negative Declaration, adopted by the Ontario City Council on May 17, 2017, in conjunction with File No. PSPA16-003; and
(3) The EIR Addendum and administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Ontario Local CEQA Guidelines; and
284
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 3 ends

(4) The City's "Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" provide for the use of a single environmental assessment in situations where the impacts of subsequent projects are adequately analyzed. This Application introduces no new significant environmental impacts. (5) All previously adopted mitigation measures shall be a condition of project approval, as they are applicable to the Project, and are incorporated herein by this reference.
(6) The EIR Addendum contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project, and reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and
(7) There is no substantial evidence in the administrative record supporting a fair argument that the project may result in significant environmental impacts.

SECTION 2: Additional Environmental Review Not Required. Based on the Addendum, all related information presented to the Planning Commission, and the specific findings set forth in Section 1, above, the Planning Commission finds that the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or MND is not required for the Project, as the Project:
(1) Does not constitute substantial changes to the Certified EIR or MND that will require major revisions to the Certified EIR or MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
(2) Does not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Certified EIR or MND were prepared, that will require major revisions to the Certified EIR or MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; and. (3) Does not contain new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Certified EIR or MND were certified/adopted, that shows any of the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Certified EIR or MND; or
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the Certified EIR or MND; or
285
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 4 ends

(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the City declined to adopt such measures; or (d) Mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the Certified EIR or MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the City declined to adopt.

SECTION 3: Planning Commission Action. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1 and 2, above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council finds that based upon the entire record of proceedings before it, and all information received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will constitute substantial changes to the Certified EIR or MND, and does hereby recommend the City Council approve the use of the EIR Addendum, attached hereto as “Attachment A,” and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 4: Indemnification. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Ontario or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Ontario or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval. The City of Ontario shall promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and the City of Ontario shall cooperate fully in the defense.

SECTION 5: Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Ontario City Hall, 303 East “B” Street, Ontario, California 91764. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City of Ontario.

SECTION 6: Certification to Adoption. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
286
287
288
RESOLUTION NO. PC22-015

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILE NO. PSPA21-001, AN

AMENDMENT TO THE PIEMONTE OVERLAY AT THE ONTARIO
CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN, [1] REVISING THE OVERLAY BOUNDARY TO ADD APPROXIMATELY 24.9 ACRES, COMPRISING OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4000 ONTARIO CENTER PARKWAY, TO THE OVERLAY AREA, [2] CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON
APPROXIMATELY 4.9 ACRES OF LAND FROM OFFICE AND

ENTERTAINMENT/RETAIL TO MIXED USE, IN AN AREA BOUNDED BY

FOURTH STREET TO THE NORTH, CONCOURS STREET AND

ONTARIO CENTER PARKWAY TO THE SOUTH, VIA ALBA TO THE

EAST, AND THE CAMDEN LANDMARK APARTMENTS AND VACANT
LAND TO THE WEST, [3] ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE MIXED USE LAND USE AREA

WITHIN THE PIEMONTE OVERLAY AT ONTARIO CENTER SPECIFIC
PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0210- 204-12, 0210-204-13, 0210-204-14, 0210-204-15, 0210-204-17, 0210-204- 18, 0210-204-20, 0210-204-21, 0210-204-22, 0210-204-23, 0210-204-23, 0210-204-24, 0210-204-25, 0210-204-26, 0210-204-28, 0210-204-36, 0210-204-37, 0210-204-37, 0210-204-38, 0210-204-39, 0210-204-40, 0210-204-41, 0210-531-06, 0210-531-07, 0210-531-08, 0210-531-09, 0210-531-10, 0210-231-11, 0210-231-12, 0210-231-13, 0210-231-14, 0210-231-15, 0210-231-16, 0210-205-01.

Page 2 ends

Specific Plan zoning district, and are developed with residential and commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2006, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2006-11, approving the creation of the Piemonte Overlay at the Ontario Center Specific Plan within the Urban Commercial land use district of the Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No.

PSPA05-003), establishing a master plan for the development of 84 acres of land, which was the former 800-acre Ontario Motor Speedway. The racing facility was completed in 1970 and closed approximately 10 years later. The facility was razed in 1981 and remained vacant until 2006, following the approval of the Piemonte at the Ontario Center Project, which established the Piemonte Overlay, allowing for the development of approximately 1.3 million square feet of retail, office, hotel, and entertainment uses, and more than 800 multiple-family dwelling units on the project site; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2017, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017-041, approving an Amendment to the Piemonte Overlay of the Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No. PSPA16-003) to reduce the development intensity of the project area, designate plaza areas, and expand the design concept to include more contemporary architectural design concepts; and
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-065, approving and Amendment to the Piemonte Overlay at the Ontario Center Specific Plan within the Urban Commercial land use district of the Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No. PSPA19-009) to allow required residential parking to be provided as tandem parking spaces; and
WHEREAS, the Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 89041009) was certified on March 19, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as “Certified EIR”), in which development and use of the Project site was discussed; and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted on May 16, 2017, (hereinafter referred to as “MND”), in association with an Amendment to the Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No. PSPA16-003); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director of the City of Ontario prepared and approved for attachment to the certified EIR and adopted MND, an Addendum to the Certified EIR and MND (hereinafter collectively referred to as “EIR Addendum”) in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, together with State and local guidelines implementing said Act, all as amended to date (collectively referred to as “CEQA”); and
WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of this project were thoroughly analyzed in the EIR Addendum, which concluded that implementation of the Project could result in a 290
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 3 ends

number of significant effects on the environment that were previously analyzed in the Certified EIR, and that the Certified EIR identified mitigation measures that would reduce each of those significant effects to a less-than-significant level; and WHEREAS, the City's "Local Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" provide for the use of a single environmental assessment in situations where the impacts of subsequent projects are adequately analyzed; and
WHEREAS, the Application is a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act — Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. — (hereinafter referred to as "CEQA") and an EIR Addendum has been prepared to determine possible environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, Ontario Development Code Table 2.02-1 (Review Matrix) grants the Planning Commission the responsibility and authority to review and make recommendation to the City Council on the subject Application; and WHEREAS, the Project has been reviewed for consistency with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan component of The Ontario Plan, as State Housing Element law (as prescribed in Government Code Sections 65580 through 65589.8) requires that development projects must be consistent with the Housing Element, if upon consideration of all its aspects, it is found to further the purposes, principals, goals, and policies of the Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, the Project is located within the Airport Influence Area of Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and is subject to, and must be consistent with, the policies and criteria set forth in the Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (hereinafter referred to as “ALUCP”), which applies only to jurisdictions within San Bernardino County, and addresses the noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity; and
WHEREAS, City of Ontario Development Code Division 2.03 (Public Hearings) prescribes the manner in which public notification shall be provided and hearing procedures to be followed, and all such notifications and procedures have been completed; and
WHEREAS, as the first action on the Project, on March 22, 2022, the Planning Commission issued a Resolution recommending the City Council approve the EIR Addendum, finding that the proposed Project introduces no new significant environmental impacts and applying all previously adopted mitigation measures to the Project, which were incorporated by reference; and
291
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 4 ends

WHEREAS, on March 22, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the Project, and concluded said hearing on that date; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED, AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario, as follows:

SECTION 1: Environmental Determination and Findings. As the recommending body for the Project, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Addendum, the initial study, and the administrative record for the Project, including all written and oral evidence provided during the comment period. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Addendum, the initial study, and the administrative record, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
(1) The environmental impacts of the Project were reviewed in conjunction with an Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 89041009), certified by the Ontario City Council on March 19, 1991 in conjunction with File No. 4059-SPA, in combination with an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, adopted by the Ontario City Council on May 17, 2017 in conjunction with File No. PSPA16-003; and
(2) The EIR Addendum and administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Ontario Local CEQA Guidelines; and
(3) The City's "Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" provide for the use of a single environmental assessment in situations where the impacts of subsequent projects are adequately analyzed. This Application introduces no new significant environmental impacts; and (4) All previously adopted mitigation measures shall be a condition of project approval, as they are applicable to the Project, and are incorporated herein by this reference; and
(5) The EIR Addendum contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project, and reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and
292
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 5 ends

(6) There is no substantial evidence in the administrative record supporting a fair argument that the project may result in significant environmental impacts.

SECTION 2: Subsequent or Supplemental Environmental Review Not Required. Based on the EIR Addendum, all related information presented to the Planning Commission, and the specific findings set forth in Section 1, above, the Planning Commission finds that the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Certified EIR is not required for the Project, as the Project:
(1) Does not constitute substantial changes to the Certified EIR that will require major revisions to the Certified EIR or MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
(2) Does not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Certified EIR or MND were prepared, that will require major revisions to the Certified EIR or MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; and. (3) Does not contain new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Certified EIR or MND were certified/adopted, that shows any of the following:
(a) The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Certified EIR or MND; or
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the Certified EIR or MND; or
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the City declined to adopt such measures; or Mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the Certified EIR or MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the City declined to adopt.

SECTION 3: Housing Element Compliance. Pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 3, Article 10.6, commencing with Section 65580, as the recommending body for the Project, the Planning Commission finds that based upon the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation, at the time of Project implementation, the project is consistent with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan (General Plan) component of The Ontario Plan. The project site contains 293
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 6 ends

four properties listed in the Available Land Inventory contained in Table A-3 (Available Land by Planning Area) of the Housing Element Technical Report Appendix. The proposed changes affect two of the four properties listed in the Available Land Inventory (Subareas 8 and 11; Map ID No. 124 and 125). The residential capacity proposed in this Project is consistent with the number of dwelling units (198) and density (48 DU/AC) specified in the Available Land Inventory.

SECTION 4: Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (“ALUCP”) Compliance. The California State Aeronautics Act (Public Utilities Code Section 21670 et seq.) requires that an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan be prepared for all public use airports in the State; and requires that local land use plans and individual development proposals must be consistent with the policies set forth in the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. On April 19, 2011, the City Council of the City of Ontario approved and adopted the ALUCP, establishing the Airport Influence Area for Ontario International Airport (hereinafter referred to as “ONT”), which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and limits future land uses and development within the Airport Influence Area, as they relate to noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity. As the recommending authority for the Project, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation against the ALUCP compatibility factors, including [1] Safety Criteria (ALUCP Table 2-2) and Safety Zones (ALUCP Map 2-2), [2] Noise Criteria (ALUCP Table 2-3) and Noise Impact Zones (ALUCP Map 2-3), [3] Airspace protection Zones (ALUCP Map 2-4), and [4] Overflight Notification Zones (ALUCP Map 2-5). As a result, the PLANNING COMMISSION, therefore, finds and determines that the Project, when implemented in conjunction with the conditions of approval, will be consistent with the policies and criteria set forth within the ALUCP.

SECTION 5: Concluding Facts and Reasons. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced hearing, and upon the specific findings set forth in Sections 1 thru 4, above, the Planning Commission hereby concludes as follows:
(1) The proposed Specific Plan, or amendment thereto, is consistent with the goals, policies, plans and exhibits of the Vision, Policy Plan (General Plan), and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the Vision, Policy Plan (General Plan), and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan, in that the Specific Plan Amendment contributes toward the legislative framework for the implementation of The Ontario Plan components, guiding growth and development within the project area to achieve optimum results from the City’s physical, economic, environmental, and human resources. 294
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA21-001
March 22, 2022

Page 7 ends

(2) The proposed Specific Plan, or amendment thereto, would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City. The development standards and guidelines established by the proposed Specific Plan Amendment have been created with the intent to safeguard and further the public interest, health, safety, convenience, and/or general welfare, and to ensure that the purposes of The Ontario Plan and the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, are maintained.
(3) The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the harmonious relationship with adjacent properties and land uses. The location of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, and the proposed conditions under which future developments will be constructed and maintained, is consistent with the Policy Plan component of The Ontario Plan and the City’s Development Plan, and, therefore, will not adversely affect the harmonious relationship with adjacent properties and land uses. (4) In the case of an application affecting specific properties, the subject site is physically suitable, including, but not limited to, parcel size, shape, access, and availability of utilities, for the request and anticipated development. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed by all City departments, which have established that the project site is physically suitable for the anticipated development in terms of parcel size, shape, and availability of utilities.

SECTION 6: Planning Commission Action. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1 through 5, above, the Planning Commission hereby RECOMMENDS THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE the herein described Application.

SECTION 7: Indemnification. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Ontario or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Ontario or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval. The City of Ontario shall promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and the City of Ontario shall cooperate fully in the defense.

SECTION 8: Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Ontario City Hall, 303 East “B” Street, Ontario, California 91764. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City of Ontario.

SECTION 9: Certification to Adoption. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
295
296
297
RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE ONTARIO CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, PURSUANT TO

THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT, AS AMENDED, FOR FILE NO PSPA21-001.

WHEREAS, THE CITY OF ONTARIO (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant") has initiated a Specific Plan Amendment, File No. PSPA21-001, which consists of an Amendment to the Piemonte Overlay of the Ontario Center Specific Plan, in the City of Ontario, California (hereinafter referred to as "Application" or "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 89041009) was certified on March 19, 1991, (hereinafter referred to as “Certified EIR”), in which development and use of the Project site was discussed in the Amendment to the Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No. 4059-SPA); and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was subsequently adopted on May 16, 2017, (hereinafter referred to as “MND”), in which development and use of the Project site was discussed in associated with an Amendment to the Ontario Center Specific Plan (File No. PSPA16-003); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director of the City of Ontario has prepared and approved for attachment to the certified Environmental Impact Report, an Addendum to the Certified EIR (hereinafter referred to as “EIR Addendum”) in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, together with State and local guidelines implementing said Act, all as amended to date (collectively referred to as “CEQA”); and
WHEREAS, the EIR Addendum concluded that implementation of the Project could result in a number of significant effects on the environment that were previously analyzed in the Certified EIR and MND, and that the Certified EIR and MND identified mitigation measures that would reduce each of those significant effects to a less-thansignificant level; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a), a lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary to a project, but the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(B), an addendum to an adopted MND may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary but the preparation of a subsequent EIR or MND is not required; and 298
WHEREAS, the City determined that none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or MND would occur from the Project, and that preparation of an Addendum to the Certified EIR and MND was appropriate; and WHEREAS, on March 22, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the Addendum and concluded said hearing on that date, voting to issue Resolution No. PC22-014 recommending that the City Council conclude that none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR have occurred, and further recommending that the City Council take actions on the Project in compliance with CEQA and state and local guidelines implementing CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ontario is the lead agency on the Project, and the City Council is the decision-making authority for the requested approval to construct and otherwise undertake the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the EIR Addendum for the Project, has concluded that none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or MND have occurred, and intends to take actions on the Project in compliance with CEQA and state and local guidelines implementing CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the EIR Addendum for the Project is on file in the Planning Department, located at 303 East B Street, Ontario, CA 91764, are available for inspection by any interested person at that location and are, by this reference, incorporated into this Resolution as if fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED, AND RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario, as follows:

SECTION 1. Environmental Determination and Findings. As the decisionmaking authority for the Project, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the administrative record for the Project. Based upon the facts and information contained in the administrative record, including all written and oral evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council finds as follows:
(1) The environmental impacts of this project were reviewed in conjunction with an Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 89041009), certified by the Ontario City Council on March 19, 1991, in conjunction with File No. 4059-SPA; and
(2) The environmental impacts of this project were reviewed in conjunction with a Mitigated Negative Declaration, adopted by the Ontario City Council on May 17, 2017, in conjunction with File No. PSPA16-003; and
299
(3) The EIR Addendum and administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Ontario Local CEQA Guidelines; and
(4) The City's "Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" provide for the use of a single environmental assessment in situations where the impacts of subsequent projects are adequately analyzed. This Application introduces no new significant environmental impacts; and (5) All previously adopted mitigation measures shall be a condition of project approval, as they are applicable to the Project, and are incorporated herein by this reference; and
(6) The EIR Addendum contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project, and reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and
(7) There is no substantial evidence in the administrative record supporting a fair argument that the project may result in significant environmental impacts.

SECTION 2. Additional Environmental Review Not Required. Based on the Addendum, all related information presented to the City Council, and the specific findings set forth in Section 1, above, the City Council finds that the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report is not required for the Project, as the Project:
(1) Does not constitute substantial changes to the Certified EIR or MND that will require major revisions to the Certified EIR or MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
(2) Does not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Certified EIR or MND was prepared, that will require major revisions to the Certified EIR or MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; and. (3) Does not contain new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Certified EIR or MND was certified/adopted, that shows any of the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Certified EIR or MND; or
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the Certified EIR or MND; or
300
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the City declined to adopt such measures; or (d) Mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the Certified EIR or MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the City declined to adopt.

SECTION 3. City Council Action. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1 and 2, above, the City Council hereby finds that based upon the entire record of proceedings before it, and all information received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will constitute substantial changes to the Certified EIR, and does hereby approve the EIR Addendum, attached hereto as “Attachment A,” and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 4. Indemnification. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Ontario or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Ontario or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval. The City of Ontario shall promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and the City of Ontario shall cooperate fully in the defense.

SECTION 5. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Ontario City Hall, 303 East “B” Street, Ontario, California 91764. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City of Ontario.

The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of April 2022. _____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
301
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________

BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLC

CITY ATTORNEY
302

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held April 19, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2022- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held April 19, 2022. _________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
303
ATTACHMENT A:

Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report
(Addendum to follow this page)
304
Addendum
to the
Ontario Center
Specific Plan EIR
for the
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022
305
Addendum
to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
(EIR No. 88-2, SCH No. 89041009)
Prepared for:

The City of Ontario
303 East “B” Street
Ontario, California 91764
Technical Assistance Provided By:

Kimley-Horn and Associates
3880 Lemon Street, Suite 420
Riverside, California 92501
March 2022
306
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 i Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................... 1-2

1.3 PURPOSE.......................................................................................................... 1-2

1.4 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION............................................................................ 1-3

1.5 CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................................. 1-4

1.6 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES FROM THE ONTARIO CENTER CERTIFIED EIR...................................................................................... 1-4

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................ 2-1

2.1 SETTING ........................................................................................................... 2-1 Surrounding Land Uses...................................................................... 2-1

2.2 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS.............................................................................. 2-1 Development Concept....................................................................... 2-3

2.3 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................ 2-3 Adept-Piemonte Land Uses and Development Components.............. 2-3 Development Intensity ...................................................................... 2-3 Circulation Plan Concept.................................................................... 2-6 Vehicular Circulation ......................................................................... 2-6

2.4 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT ...................................................................................... 2-7

2.5 PROJECT PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE........................................ 2-7 Buildings and Facilities....................................................................... 2-7 Utilities and Infrastructure................................................................. 2-7 Parks and Open Space ....................................................................... 2-7

2.6 INTENDED USE OF THIS ADDENDUM, PROJECT DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS ....... 2-7 Use of this Addendum ....................................................................... 2-7 Project Discretionary Actions, Permits, Consultation ......................... 2-7

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 3-1

3.2 ALLOWED AND PROPOSED MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY .................. 3-1

3.3 ALLOWED AND PROPOSED LAND USES ............................................................ 3-1

3.4 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION, DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.................................................................................................. 3-2

3.5 ENVIRONMENTAL TOPICS ................................................................................ 3-3 Land Use and Planning....................................................................... 3-4 307
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 ii Table of Contents
Socioeconomics................................................................................. 3-7 Public Services................................................................................... 3-8 Utilities.............................................................................................. 3-8 Traffic and Circulation...................................................................... 3-13 Biological Resources........................................................................ 3-19 Air Quality ....................................................................................... 3-19 Noise ............................................................................................... 3-22 Aesthetics........................................................................................ 3-32 Seismicity ........................................................................................ 3-32 Hydrology........................................................................................ 3-32 Water Quality .................................................................................. 3-33 Alternatives..................................................................................... 3-33 Cumulative Impacts......................................................................... 3-33

4.0 DETERMINATION ........................................................................................................ 4-1 Major EIR Revisions Not Required .................................................................... 4-1 No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions .......... 4-1 No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects
than Identified in the EIR.................................................................................. 4-1 No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects Identified in the EIR.......................................................................................... 4-1 Appendices
Appendix A: RK Engineering. July 2021. Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix B: RK Engineering. June 2021. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Appendix C: RK Engineering. May 2021. Noise Impact Study Appendix D: RK Engineering. June 2021. Energy Study
Appendix E: Other CEQA Topics/Environmental Analysis Checklist 308
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 iii Table of Contents
List of Tables
Table 1-1: The Ontario Center EIR Mitigation Measures Monitoring and Reporting Program .. 1-5 Table 2-1: Proposed Project Summary..................................................................................... 2-2 Table 2-2: Previous Projects vs. Proposed Project Comparison Summary ................................ 2-2 Table 2-3: Detailed Project Land Use Summary ....................................................................... 2-4 Table 2-4: Estimated Water Demand....................................................................................... 2-5 Table 3-1: Summary of OCSP Trip Generation ....................................................................... 3-14 Table 3-2: Summary of OCSP Project Trip Generation Available for Future Land Uses........... 3-14 Table 3-3: Comparison of Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation ............................................ 3-17 Table 3-4: Parcel Numbers .................................................................................................... 3-18 Table 3-5: Operational Vehicle Miles Traveled ...................................................................... 3-20 Table 3-6: SCAQMD Regional Significance Air Quality Thresholds.......................................... 3-21 Table 3-7: Daily Construction Emissions ................................................................................ 3-22 Table 3-8: Typical Construction Noise Levels......................................................................... 3-24 Table 3-9: Project Construction Noise Levels – Residential Uses to the North ....................... 3-25 Table 3-10: Typical Construction Vibration Levels.................................................................. 3-26 Table 3-11: Construction Vibration Impact Analysis .............................................................. 3-27 Table 3-12: Stationary Noise Impact Analysis1....................................................................... 3-28 Table 3-13: Future Traffic Noise Levels1................................................................................. 3-29 Table 3-14: Preliminary Interior Noise Impact Analysis.......................................................... 3-29 List of Figures
Figure 1: Regional Vicinity Location....................................................................................... 1-12 Figure 2: The Ontario Center Specific Plan (OCSP)................................................................. 1-13 Figure 3: Local Vicinity Map..................................................................................................... 2-9 Figure 4: Development Concept – Lot A ................................................................................ 2-10 Figure 5: Development Concept – Lot B ................................................................................ 2-11 Figure 6: Development Concept – Lot C................................................................................. 2-12 Figure 7: Development Concept – Lot D ................................................................................ 2-13 Figure 8: Community Events Center Addendum (CECA) - 2006 ................................................ 3-1 Figure 9: Project Site Plan (Lots A and B) ................................................................................. 3-2 Figure 10: Project Site Plan (Lots C and D) ............................................................................... 3-3 Figure 11: Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum (POCA) Specific Plan - 2006 ...................... 3-4 Figure 12: Piemonte Overlay at Ontario Center (POOC) Specific Plan – 2017........................... 3-5 Figure 13: Elevations (Lots A and B)......................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 14: Elevations (Lots C and D)......................................................................................... 3-7 309
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Introduction

1.0 Introduction
310
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-1 Introduction

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Addendum to the Certified Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report No. 88-2 (Certified EIR) has been prepared in response to an application for the construction and operation of approximately 71,200 square feet (SF) of retail and 694 Multi-Family Residential Dwelling Units (DU) (540,373 SF) and approximately 998 parking spaces in the City of Ontario; refer to Figure 1, Regional Vicinity Location.

1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
The City of Ontario approved the Ontario Center Specific Plan (OCSP) in August 1981. As adopted in 1981, the OCSP provided for up to 1,530 residential units, close to seven million square feet of commercial development, and nearly two million square feet of industrial uses on approximately 600 acres. Several amendments to the 1981 OCSP, along with appropriate environmental review, have been approved by the City since its adoption. Specifically, EIR 80-3 (State Clearinghouse No. 80062538), which evaluated the original OCSP along with development proposals for adjacent areas totaling more than 1,500 acres (the “Ontario International Center” project), was certified by the City in 1980. EIR 88-2 (the Certified EIR considered by this Addendum, State Clearinghouse (No. 89041009) was certified in 1990 as a “Subsequent EIR” to EIR 80-3. The analysis presented in the Certified EIR was limited to those undeveloped portions of the OCSP remaining as of 1990, comprising approximately 495 acres located between Fourth Street and Interstate 10, and between Turner Avenue and Interstate 15.

The Project Description from the Certified EIR includes the following:

Certified Ontario Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report 88-2 (Certified EIR) EIR 88-2 was prepared to review and update, where necessary, existing environmental conditions, to address the proposed redistribution of allowable building density within The Ontario Center, and to address expected impacts of a proposed regional shopping center within the Center. (EIR 88-2, page II-1).

The regional shopping center referenced above was developed in the mid-1990s as the “Ontario Mills,” revising the OCSP’s original concept to implement industrial uses between Milliken and the I-15. The remaining portions of the OCSP, designated for commercial and residential uses, have largely been developed. In recent years, multi-family residential development to the north of Fourth Street has occurred rapidly and has been accompanied by multiple commercial infill projects along the Milliken Avenue and Fourth Street corridors. Two multi-family residential projects totaling approximately 800 units on 32 acres, known as the Fairfield and Sares-Regis projects, are currently under construction south of Fourth Street and east of Haven Avenue. The Project described within this Addendum will account for the majority of the remaining undeveloped areas of the original OCSP; refer to Figure 2, The Ontario Center Specific Plan (OCSP).

As noted above, since the Certification of the Certified EIR, several addenda to the original EIR have been adopted. The following three amendments to the original Certified EIR have been certified by the City:
311
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-2 Introduction
1) The Community Events Center Addendum (CECA), 2006, which consisted of a request for approval to construct a 9,000-seat Community Events Center, a multi-purpose stadium totaling 214,420 square feet (SF) on approximately 24.5 acres, located at the northeast corner of Concours Street and Mercedes Lane, within the Urban Commercial land use district and within the OCSP in the southernmost portion of Statistical Area “E.”
2) The Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum to the Certified EIR (POCA), 2006, was permitted to realize approximately 1,292,068 SF of mixed retail, commercial, office, and hotel uses; and up to 806 condominium/apartment units. Excluding the Project’s proposed residential uses. 3) The 2017 Piemonte Overlay at Ontario Center (POOC) Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (PSPA 16-003) proposed approximately 1.3 million SF of retail, office, hotel, and entertainment uses; however, 791 multiple-family DU were proposed. These are summarized in Section 3.4 below and are incorporated by reference.

1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY
The proposed Project consists of a request for approval to construct 694 Multi-family DUs (540,373 SF), 71,20071,200 SF of commercial and approximately 998 parking spaces, all within Statistical Area “E”; refer to Figure 2. Because the proposed Project Statistical Area “E” footprint was separately amended by the previously identified CECA, POCA and the POOC MND, the proposed Project will cite to these various documents where appropriate to adequately note how the proposed Project’s footprint was previously amended. The Project consists of construction and operation of a mixed-use town center development with residential and commercial/retail land use within six development areas/lots (A, B, C, D, F, and G).

More specifically, the proposed Project Lots A and B will be developed in the portion of the STATISTICAL AREA “E” originally amended by the CECA. Lots C, D, F and G of the proposed Project will occur just north of Lots A and B within the portion of STATISTICAL AREA “E” previously amended by the POCA and later amended by the POOC. Refer to Section 2.0, Project Description, of this addendum. Refer to Table 2-1, Detailed Proposed Project Summary, and Table 2-2, Land Use Comparison Summary.

1.3 PURPOSE
The purpose of this EIR Addendum is to define, describe, compare, and contrast potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project in the context of the environmental impacts associated with the OCSP (March 1990), as assessed in the Certified EIR. In so doing, this Addendum will provide environmental documentation for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project at the Ontario Center consistent with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be prepared “if some changes or additions [to a Certified EIR] are necessary, but none of the conditions described in [CEQA Guidelines] Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines identifies the conditions that require preparation of a subsequent EIR as follows:

No subsequent EIR shall be prepared for a project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that one or more of the following conditions are met:
312
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-3 Introduction
• Substantial changes are proposed in the project that require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; • Substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; or New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, shows any of the following:
• The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; • Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than identified in the previous EIR;
• Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; • Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives.

This Addendum to the Certified EIR describes the Project and substantiates how the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project are appropriately and adequately addressed in the Certified EIR and the aforementioned certified addenda and MND. The focus of the analysis is the adequacy of the previously Certified EIR, addenda and MND, relative to the Project in its current environmental context.

1.4 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION
This Addendum is presented in four (4) sections, as follows:
• Section 1.0, “Introduction,” provides an overview of the Project, its context, and environmental documentation applicable to the proposed development. A table summarizing impacts and mitigation from the Ontario Center Certified EIR is included in this section, and mitigation measures applicable to the Project are identified. No new or substantially modified mitigation measures are required.
• Section 2.0, “Project Description,” presents the Project in greater detail, and describes its relationship to existing and anticipated vicinity development. • Section 3.0, “Environmental Analysis,” assesses potential environmental impacts of the Project.

The analysis considers potential effects of the Project for all environmental topics addressed in the Certified EIR.
• Section 4.0, “Determination,” presents the determination regarding the appropriate environmental document for the Project.
313
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-4 Introduction

1.5 CONCLUSIONS
The analysis presented in this document substantiates that the Certified EIR for the Ontario Center is sufficient to satisfy CEQA requirements for the approval of the proposed Project at the OCSP. That is, implementation and operation of the proposed Project described herein would not result in any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts than were previously considered and addressed in the Certified EIR, or in the previously noted CECA, POCA, and POOC. Further, the Project would implement all applicable mitigation measures presented in the Certified EIR. As such, potential environmental impacts of the Project are considered to be adequately and appropriately addressed by analysis presented in the Certified EIR. The Project does not require any major revision of the Certified EIR, nor would the Project result in conditions that would require preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR as described in Sections 15162 and 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines.

1.6 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES FROM THE

ONTARIO CENTER CERTIFIED EIR
The following Table 1-1, The Ontario Center EIR Mitigation Measures, is excerpted from the Certified EIR (SCH No. 89041009) and includes a summary of impacts and mitigation measures associated with that project. To the satisfaction of the City, the proposed Project will implement all applicable mitigation measures. As substantiated within Section 3.0 of this Addendum, no new or modified or modified mitigation measures are required.
314
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-5 Introduction
Table 1-1: The Ontario Center EIR Mitigation Measures Monitoring and Reporting Program Timing Responsible Entity/Agency Mitigation Measures Draft EIR Page

FIRE PROTECTION

1. Prior to issuance of a
building permit
Developer
The developer will pay a fair share of "in-lieu" fees to subsidize additional facilities and equipment as mutually agreed upon by both the developer and the City of Ontario.

III-20

2. At the time of Water Master
Plan Update
Developers within TOC
All new development will participate in updating the City of Ontario Water Master Plan and will contribute on a "fair share" basis toward implementation of Master Plan programs.

III-20

3. Prior to issuance of a
building permit
Ontario Fire
Department/Developers
within TOC
Ontario Fire Department and project developer will provide, in writing, assurance of water supply adequacy from local water purveyor. III-20

4. During site plan review Ontario Fire Department
Design features at the site plan level will reduce risk of fire hazard. Site plan proposals will be reviewed during site plan review by Ontario Fire Department (OFD). Protection measures recommended by the OFD will be implemented by project proponent.

III-20

LAW ENFORCEMENT

1. At the issuance of a building
permit
Developer
If a proposed ordinance is adopted, the regional center builder/developer may be required to pay a one-time developer assessment fee to the Police Department at the time of issuance of a building permit. This developer fee will mitigate the fiscal impact incurred by the Police Department.

Due to the projected increase in police calls for service to be generated by the development. The amount of this fee will be established by the Ontario Police Department based on land use and projected calls-forservice from that use.

III-23

2. During site plan review for
individual projects
Developers within TOC
Each individual project within The Ontario Center will incorporate on-site security measures. These measures will be reviewed by the Ontario Police Department. They will include, but not be limited to, limited-height landscaping, exterior lighting, security hardware.

III-23

3. During site plan review for
individual projects
Developers within TOC
In addition to these physical security and lighting requirements, the Police Department requests that the developer submit a plan delineating which functions are to be addressed by on-site private security and what functions are to be served by the Police Department. This plan may include III-23
315
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-6 Introduction
Timing Responsible Entity/Agency Mitigation Measures Draft EIR Page personnel selection and training and physical security measures, i.e., video surveillance, emergency call boxes, communication and alarms. This plan shall be approved by the Police Department prior to implementation.

SCHOOLS

1. Prior to the issuance of a
building permit
Residential Developers
within TOC
Developers of residential projects within The Ontario Center will pay required school impact mitigation fees of $29,000 per gross acre to Cucamonga School District per agreement reached between the District and the developer dated December 31, 1986.

III-26

2. Prior to the issuance of a
building permit
Residential Developers
within TOC
Developers of projects within The Ontario Center will pay fees, as noted below, to the Chaffey Joint Unified School District:

Residential $.48/square foot
Commercial/Industrial/Office $.08/square foot
III-26

PARKS AND RECREATION

1. Prior to the issuance of a
building permit if a County
ordinance is adopted
Developers within TOC
Regional Parks: The responsibility for rehabilitating existing regional parks and/or building new facilities, rests with the County of San Bernardino Parks Department. A Draft Ordinance has been prepared by the County Parks Department which will require developers to pay fees for future parks and open space. Developers within The Ontario Center shall comply with the City of Ontario’s implementation of the County’s fee ordinance for the collection of development fees for regional parks, trails, and open space if and when it is enacted.

III-30

2. At the time of issuance of
building permit
Developers within TOC
Local Parks: A Park Development Fund Fee of $802/single family detached unit and $700/multiple family unit will be paid at the time of issuance of building perm its.

III-30

3. During site plan review for
individual projects
Developers within TOC
Private recreational opportunities shall be encouraged for the commercial retail/industrial use areas. III-30

WATER SUPPLY

1. During site plan review
Developer and Ontario
Municipal Utilities Company
All existing and future users will share in costs of supplemental city-wide water supply system III-34

2. During site plan review for
individual projects when
water is available
Developers within TOC
Reclaimed water, as it is available from CBMWD Regional Plan No. 4, will be used for open space irrigation when economically feasible. III-34 316
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-7 Introduction
Timing Responsible Entity/Agency Mitigation Measures Draft EIR Page

3. Ongoing Developers within TOC
Cooperation between CBMWD, the City of Ontario, developers of The Ontario Center and other landowners will be necessary to ensure adequate capacity.

III-34

WASTEWATER

1. During site plan review of
individual project
Developer and Ontario
Municipal Utilities
Company
Design and construction of wastewater collection facilities within the Ontario Center will be completed under the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario.

III-38

2. Ongoing and during site plan
review of individual projects
Developer and Ontario
Municipal Utilities
Company
Any plans for use of the non-reclaimable waste line (NRW) system will be made known to the City and CBMWD. III-39

3. Prior to issuance of
construction permits
Developer
Wastewater collection facilities will be designed so that all parcels can be served by gravity mains without pumping. III-39

4. Ongoing
Developer and Ontario
Municipal Utilities
Company
The Ontario Center project development will coordinate construction activities with the City of Ontario and CBMWD to assure adequate interceptor, trunk sewer and treatment plant capacity is available as development proceeds.

III-39

5. Ongoing
Developer and Ontario
Municipal Utilities
Company
Continued coordination between CBMWD, the City, the developers of The Ontario Center, and other property owners/developers will occur to assure adequate capacity is available in the Cucamonga Interceptor as development occurs within the tributary area.

III-39

SOLID WASTE

1. 2-3 Years
City of Ontario Community
Facilities Department,
Integrated Waste
Department
Solid waste will be disposed of in Milliken Landfill. Upon closing of the Milliken Landfill, waste will be disposed of at the San Timoteo Landfill. A transfer station for the City will be constructed by the City in the next 2 to 3 years to transport waste from Ontario to the San Timoteo Landfill.

III-44, III-45

2. Ongoing
Developers within TOC/City
of Ontario Community
Facilities Department,
Integrated Waste
Department
Reusable materials will be recycled. Trash compactors will be used. III-45 317
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-8 Introduction
Timing Responsible Entity/Agency Mitigation Measures Draft EIR Page

3. During site plan review of
individual projects
Developers within TOC
Site plans shall address the use of trash bins (dumpsters) provided for office, commercial, industrial, residential other land uses. III-45

4. Prior to ultimate build-out
City of Ontario Community
Facilities Department,
Integrated Waste Department
One (1) additional commercial trash vehicle will be required to serve The Ontario Center at ultimate development. III-45

5. Ongoing Developers within TOC
A recycling program will be undertaken within The Ontario Center to encourage the economic re-use of such items as paper, glass, metal and other salvageable material.

III-45

TELEPHONE

1. When needed Developer
New facilities are proposed, including a switching station and a remote switching station. Supporting Structure expenses will be shared by GTE (the telephone services provider) and the developer.

III-46

2. Ongoing Developers within TOC
Ultimate phasing of telephone improvements shall be consistent with the development of land uses in the Center. III-47

3. Prior to installation
City of Ontario Engineering
Department
All substructure and supporting structures shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. III-47

4. Prior to building occupancy GTE
GTE (telephone services provided) will place cable and wire to each unit at its own expense and there will be no charges by GTE to individual subscribers other than normal connection charges. New connections will be provided by GTE under contract to any new clients will-serve basis.

III-47

TRAFFIC

1. As warranted by traffic
volume
TOC and Developers within
TOC
Buildout in the project vicinity of the proposed circulation system defined in the Specific Plan Amendment will occur. III-60

2. When peak hour traffic
reaches LOS C as determined
by City Engineer
TOCOA/City of Ontario
Engineering Department
Development and implementation of a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) program with a goal of a ten percent reduction in peak hour trips will occur as defined in the Specific Plan Amendment.

III-63

3. Prior to issuance of building
permits
Developer(s) within and
adjacent to The Ontario
Center
Applicants for all future specific plans and specific plan amendments in the vicinity of The Ontario Center project will be required to complete traffic impact and mitigation studies to ensure that the forty (40) intersections studied this EIR will not exceed an intersection capacity utilization greater than Level of Service E.

III-63
318
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-9 Introduction
Timing Responsible Entity/Agency Mitigation Measures Draft EIR Page

AIR QUALITY

1. During construction
Ontario Building Department,
TOC, Developers within TOC
and contractor(s)
Regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust control measures defined in SCAQM D Rule 403 will occur during construction. III-86

2. During construction
Developer and
contractor(s)
Construction equipment will be maintained in proper tune to minimize the volume of equipment exhaust emissions. III-86

3. When peak hour traffic
reaches LOS C as determined
by City Engineer
TOC, TOCOA, Developers
within TOC/City of Ontario
Engineering Department
Comprehensive ridesharing incentive program will be developed as part of a Transportation System Management. III-87

4. During site review of
individual projects
Developers within TOC/City
of Ontario Engineering
Department
Orientation of project for transit convenience and accessibility will occur in design phase; provision of easy pedestrian access will occur in design phase; provision of bus shelters, benches and bus pockets on streets.

III-87

5. During site review of
individual projects
Developers within TOC/City
of Ontario Engineering
Department
Provision of traffic flow improvements will occur as buildout of project occurs. III-87

6. During design phase Developers within TOC
Inclusion of solar and other energy-saving devices in residences and businesses including:
• Delamping
• increased building insulation
• heating/ventilation/air conditioning Improvements
• solar heaters
• utilization of landscape features to shade buildings
III-87

7. During construction
Developers within TOC and
contractor(s)
Construction activities should avoid high ozone days and discontinue construction during second stage alerts. After grading, seed and water until vegetation cover is established.

III-87

8. During construction
TOC, Developers and
contractor(s)
Wet area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pickup by the wind.

III-87

9. During construction Contractor(s) within TOC
Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust from being raised beyond site operations. W et construction areas down in the late morning and after work is completed in the day.

III-87
319
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-10 Introduction
Timing Responsible Entity/Agency Mitigation Measures Draft EIR Page

10. During construction
TOC, Developers and
contractor(s)
Use low sulfur fuel for construction equipment (0.5 percent by w eight). III-87 NOISE

1. During construction
City of Ontario Building
Department
The City of Ontario will enforce the City's noise ordinance during all phases of construction which limits the hours construction to normal weekday working hours.

III-98

2. Prior to issuance of building
permit
Developers with TOC, City of
Ontario Building Department
Project applicants will design private offices to 40 50 Leq (l 2), general offices and retail uses to 45 55 Leq (l 2), and industrial buildings to 55-65 Leq (l ). Interior noise levels will be in accordance with the City's interior noise requirement for commercial uses.

III-98

3. Prior to issuance of building
permit
Developers with TOC, City of
Ontario Building Department
The project applicant will specify measures to comply with the 45 CNEL interior noise standards for residences at the time of building permit application.

III-98

4. During site plan review
Developers within TOC/City of
Ontario Building Department
Locate truck access routes and loading areas away sensitive land uses such as residential areas. III-98

5. During site plan review
Developers within TOC/City of
Ontario Building Department
Locate mechanical equipment such as ventilation and air conditioning units away from sensitive receptors and install equipment with proper acoustical shielding.

III-98

6. During site plan review
Developer within TOC, City of
Ontario Building Department
Minimize noise impacts through proper selection of such ventilation and air conditioning equipment. III-98

7. Prior to issuance of building
permit
Developers within TOC, City
of Ontario Building
Department
The project applicants will design all structures in accordance with the most recent revision of the Uniform Building Code and will implement measures to reduce noise to acceptable levels where residential buildings are proposed within the 65 CNEL contours.

III-99

8. Prior to issuance of building
permit
Developers within TOC, City
of Ontario Building
Department
The City will review the design of proposed structures to ensure that adequate noise mitigation measures have been incorporated. III-99

AESTHETICS

1. During site plan review and
prior to issuance of building
permit
Developers within TOC/City of
Ontario Planning Department
Design and construction standards as defined in the Specific Plan shall be adhered to. III-104
320
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 1-11 Introduction
Timing Responsible Entity/Agency Mitigation Measures Draft EIR Page

SEISMICITY

1. Prior to issuance of building
permit
Developers within TOC/City of
Ontario Building Department
The potential for groundshaking, associated with seismic activity in the region exists and is unavoidable. All requirements of the Uniform Building Code shall be met in the design and engineering of buildings on site in order to minimize the effects of seismic activity.

III-104

HYDROLOGY

1. Prior to issuance of grading
permit
Developers within TOC/City
of Ontario Engineering
Department
On-site drainage plans will be designed, submitted to, and approved by the City of Ontario prior to the issuance of a grading permit. III-110

2. Prior to construction
Developers with TOC, City of
Ontario Engineering
Department
Proposed storm drainage facilities to be installed as The Ontario Center develops, will be placed in public streets. W here storm drains must be placed in areas other than public streets, a drainage easement will be dedicated as needed.

III-111

3. Prior to issuance of
occupancy permit
Developers with TOC, City of
Ontario Engineering
Department
Some modification will be necessary to existing drainage facilities. No existing facility will be removed without replacement by another structure to serve the particular condition.

III-111

4. During construction
Developers within TOC/City
of Ontario Engineering
Department
As development proceeds, there will be a need for temporary siltation basins to reduce sedimentation from construction activities. These will be located in specific areas of construction and sized in accordance with City of Ontario criteria.

III-111

WATER QUALITY

1. During construction
Developers within TOC and
contractors, City of Ontario
Engineering Department
During construction, a variety of temporary structural measures such as velocity dissipators, siltation fences or basins and. vegetative buffer zones will be used to reduce siltation and sedimentation runoff from construction sites.

III-115

2. Prior construction
Developers with TOC,
contractors/City of Ontario
Public Works Agency.

Periodic cleaning of storm drains and inlets, construction of pervious pavement surfaces in areas designated by the City, periodic street sweeping.

III-115

3. Ongoing
City of Ontario Public
Works Agency/Developers
within TOC/TOCOA
Periodic street sweeping will be conducted by the City of Ontario for streets dedicated to the City. Periodic vacuum sweeping will be conducted by the owners of individual sites.

III-115
Source: Final Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Ontario Center Specific Plan. SCH No. 89041009. Dated October 12, 1990. 321
Figure 1: Regional Vicinity Map
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
Project Site
322
Figure 2: The Ontario Center Specific Plan (OCSP)
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario 323
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Project Description

2.0 Project Description
324
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 2-1 Project Description

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 SETTING
The Project site consists of approximately 19 acres of fully developed and previously graded land located at the northerly boundary of the City of Ontario, south of Fourth Street, north of Concours Street, between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue, and less than one-quarter mile north of Interstate 10 (I-10); refer to Figure 1.

Regional access to the Project site and vicinity is provided by the I-10 and Interstate 15 (I-15) freeways, which converge approximately one mile southeasterly of the Project site. Local access to I-10 is provided at Milliken and Haven Avenues, and access to I-15 is available from Fourth Street. Supplementing freeway and surface street access, a Metrolink transit station is located approximately 1.5 miles northerly of the Project site, west of Milliken Avenue at Eighth Street.

Surrounding Land Uses
Figure 3, Local Vicinity, provides an aerial view of the Project site and surrounding land uses. Local context of the Project is described below.

Fourth Street, which forms the site's northerly boundary, is also the corporate boundary dividing the cities of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga. Multi-family residential uses (apartments) and a small retail/restaurant development are located northerly of the Project site across Fourth Street, in Rancho Cucamonga.

To the east, across Milliken Avenue, is the Ontario Mills Shopping Center, comprised of a central mall surrounded by free-standing commercial, entertainment, and restaurant uses. The Kohl’s department store is located between the Project site and Milliken Avenue, at the southwest corner of Milliken and Fourth Street.

To the southeast, across Concours, additional existing retail uses are located adjacent to Milliken Avenue.

Directly within the Project area is the existing multi-purpose Toyota Arena along with its supporting facilities. To the west, on both sides of Duesenberg Drive between Fourth Street and Concours, is the 800-unit Fairfield/Sares-Regis multi-family residential complex.

2.2 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
The proposed Project is the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project, which is composed of the following six Lots:

A, B, C, D, F and G, see Figure 2. Lots A and B are currently developed as vehicle parking areas serving the Toyota Arena (formerly the Citizens Business Bank Arena) and developed under the CECA. Lots C, D, F and G are vacant, but have been previously graded and are located north of Lots A and B. Lots C, D, F and G do not contain native habitat, they are fenced and are bounded by a fully developed internal roadway system. To this day, other development has occurred mostly within the western portion of Statistical Area E, see Figure 2.
325
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 2-2 Project Description
The proposed Project includes a total of 694 multi-family residential DUs, 71,200 square feet of retail uses and approximately 998 parking spaces on the approximately 19-acre site. The site plan used for this analysis is provided in Figures 9 and 10 Also refer to Table 2-1, Proposed Project Summary, and Table 2-2, Previous Projects vs. Proposed Project Comparison Summary.

Table 2-1: Proposed Project Summary
Lot Commercial (SF) DU (SF) Parking Area (SF) Dwelling Units Parking Stalls A 25,870 268,181 153,284 384 504
B 20,802 111,021 47,526 112 194
C 11,047 75,866 37,192 94 138
D 14,095 85,305 40,966 104 162
TOTAL 71,200 540,373 278,968 694
998
Notes:

DU: Dwelling Unit(s)
SF: Square Feet
Table 2-2: Previous Projects vs. Proposed Project Comparison Summary Land Use
Certified EIR/
OCSP
(Statistical Area
“E”)
CECA
(Statistical Area
“E”)
POCA
(Statistical Areas
“D” & “E”)
POOC
(Statistical Areas
“D” & “E”)
Proposed Project
(Statistical Area
“E”)
Commercial/
Entertainment (SF) - 214,420 (Arena) 447,313 562,068 -
Urban Commercial
(SF)
2,200,000
(Statistical Area
“E”)
- - - 71,200
Hotel (SF) - -
290,400
(336 rooms)
180,000
(236 rooms) -
Office (SF) - - 554,355 550,000 -
Multi-Family
Residential (DU) - - 806 791 694
Total 2,200,000 SF 214,420 SF
1,292,068 SF
& 806 DU
1,292,068 SF
& 791 DU
71,200 SF
& 694 DU
Notes:

DU: Dwelling Unit(s)
SF: Square Feet
CECA: Community Events Center Addendum
POCA: Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum to the Certified EIR POOC: Piemonte Overlay at Ontario center Mitigated Negative Declaration Construction of the proposed Project is estimated to occur in one phase and is anticipated to begin in the last quarter of 2022 and last approximately 21 months. Construction activities are expected to consist of demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The proposed Project is anticipated to demolish an existing asphalt surface parking lot of approximately

7.5 acres within Lots A and B. The proposed Project is not expected to require the import or export of earthwork materials; preliminary grading estimates show a balanced site. The Project is expected to be operational in the year 2023.
326
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 2-3 Project Description
Development Concept
The proposed Project development concept is illustrated in Figure 4, Development Concept – Lot A through Figure 7, Development Concept – Lot D. The overall design concept for the proposed Project depicts a contemporary, pedestrian-oriented development, with an emphasis on wide sidewalks, outdoor seating, retail, dining areas, and landscape.

The central corridor or spine of the Project development concept is established by the north-south Via Piemonte roadway which traverses the Project site and Fourth street on the north, and terminates at Ontario Center Parkway, just north of Lots A and B. Via Piemonte is currently anchored by offices to the south and the Toyota Area and other uses further south and commercial to the east.

The proposed Project will incorporate varied landscape/hardscape features and pedestrian-oriented activity areas. Building mass and placement along Via Piemonte will be used to create interesting spaces, to include courtyards and outdoor seating areas. In so doing, the Via Piemonte development concept (Lots C and D) will provide a visually and spatially varied streetscape. Similarly, the development of Lots A and B will provide visually and spatially varied street scape visible from Concours Street and Ontario Center Parkway; refer to Figures 4 – 9.

Lots A and B are designed to emphasize dining and entertainment opportunities and will be delineated by decorative pavement and other defining landscape/hardscape treatments. This central core area is also designed to encourage visitors to move in a north/south direction, thereby fostering interaction with the hotel use and office uses located in the south and central portion of the Project site. Via Piemonte will allow for direct connectivity between all of the proposed developments. The various land use components within the Project will be connected by a series of defined pedestrian walkways. Pedestrian links have also been designed to allow workers, residents, and visitors to move through the site.

The Project will provide ample parking located in Lots E and F, abutting Fourth Street. As indicated in Figures 4 through 9, the proposed Project will integrate residential and commercial uses seamlessly to provide an active area that is utilized to its potential.

2.3 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
Adept-Piemonte Land Uses and Development Components
At completion, the Project will realize more than six-hundred thousand square feet of development, as summarized in Table 2-1.

Development Intensity
The proposed Project is proposed within Statistical Area “E” of the OCSP. Statistical Area “E” is made up of Planning Areas (PAs) 8-10, totals 153.25 acres, and was originally approved for 2,200,000 square feet (SF) of urban commercial; refer to Figure 2.

Table 2-1 shows a breakdown of the proposed Project features. Also refer to Table 2-2 for a comparison between the proposed Project and previous Projects approved on the site. Additionally, refer to Table 2-3, 327
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 2-4 Project Description
Detailed Project Land Use Summary, for a specific breakdown of the proposed Project uses. As shown in Table 2-2, the Project is anticipated to develop the Project site with much less intensity compared than the previously analyzed and approved uses in the Certified EIR/OCSP, CECA, POCA, and POOC.

Table 2-3: Detailed Project Land Use Summary
Lot Land Use Units Residential Square Feet
(SF)
Commercial
(SF) Parking Spaces
A
Residential
2 Bedroom
1 Bedroom
Studio
120
180
84 268,181 - 504
Retail - - 25,256 -
B
Residential
3 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
1 Bedroom
19 63
30 111,021 - 194
Retail - - 20,802 -
C
Residential
2 Bedroom
1 Bedroom
Studio
44 32
18 75,866 - 138
Retail - - 11,047 -
D
Residential
2 Bedroom
1 Bedroom
Studio
58 42
4 85,305 - 162
Retail - - 14,095 -
Project Total 694 540,373 71,200 998
Source: Adept-Piemonte Overlay at Ontario Center Project Site Plan Concept, March 2022.

As noted above in Table 2-3, the proposed Project would realize approximately 71,200 SF of mixed retail, 694 multi-family DUs (540,373 SF) and would include approximately 998 vehicle parking spaces. The proposed commercial/retail/residential uses that would be realized under the proposed Project are consistent with uses envisioned under the Certified EIR and OCSP and would comprise 611,573 of combined SF or 1,588,427 SF less than the originally approved 2.2 million SF of allowable maximum development intensity for Statistical Area “E” which was anticipated to be a composition of urban commercial under the original OCSP and the Certified EIR, and later amended by the CECA, POCA, and POOC addendums to allow residential/ commercial/entertainment/retail, urban commercial, and office.

The subsequent addendums to the OCSP and the Certified EIR introduced a multi-family residential component which allowed up to 806 apartments within the POCA and 791 apartments within the POOC, but these amendments also included Statistical Area “D” in their analysis which is a smaller portion of the OCSP. Statistical Area “D” was also originally planned for urban commercial uses. Statistical Area “D” and 328
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 2-5 Project Description
will occasionally be referenced throughout this addendum for reference purposes only in order to accurately reference the POCA and POOC projects.

Because the 694 multi-family DUs proposed by the Project would be less intense than that previously approved for the site and based on the 1,548,710 SF balance of development SF referenced above, it can be reasonably anticipated that the proposed Project in total would not exceed the remaining allowable maximum development intensity for Statistical Area E, as noted in the Certified EIR.

Additionally, an approximation of relative development intensity can be discerned by comparing defining characteristics of land uses, such as traffic generation, water demand, and wastewater generation rates.

These factors are particularly appropriate when assessing the Project’s relative development intensity, in that the upper limit of development intensity defined for the OCSP is founded largely on estimated roadway and water/sewer carrying capacities. In short, the forecast trip generation from the proposed Project is anticipated to be well-below the trips available for future use within Statistical Area “D and E” of the OCSP. The proposed Project is anticipated to generate approximately 94 percent less weekday trips, approximately 86 percent less weekday AM Peak Hour trips and approximately 84 percent less weekday PM Peak Hour trips than the total trips available for future uses within Statistical Areas D and E, as noted in Table 3-3.

As noted above, traffic generation rates would be reduced because of the Project’s lower overall proposed development intensity compared to the approved development under the POOC. Similarly, water demands, and wastewater generation rates would be much lower when compared to the maximum allowable development from the OCSP on the same acreage. More specifically, it is anticipated that 694 apartment units would result in mean annual water demands of approximately 298,420 gallons per day (GPD) and 71,200 SF of commercial is anticipated to demand approximately 34,309 GPD, for a total combination of 332,729 GPD for the proposed Project. In contrast, if the same acreage was developed with commercial uses at the maximum allowable development intensity of the remaining 1,772,000 SF of urban commercial as permitted under the OCSP, water demands would be approximately 855,876 GPD1.

Under the POCA, the site was proposed to include approximately 1.3 million square feet of mixed commercial, hotel, and office uses, as well as up to 806 condominium/apartment units would have been implemented. Total water demands of these uses were forecast at 727,888 GPD. Compared to the previously approved POCA, the proposed Project would reduce water consumption by approximately 55 percent. Total water demands of the proposed Project land uses are summarized in Table 2-4, Estimated Water Demand.

Table 2-4: Estimated Water Demand
Land Use 1 Units Demand Factor 2 Total Dem and
Commercial 71,200 TSF 483 GPD/TSF 34,389 GPD
Residential 694 DU 430 GPD/DU 298,420 GPD
Total Water Demand 332,729 GPD
1 Ontario Center Specific Plan. Page 122
329
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 2-6 Project Description
Sources:
1Land uses from: Piemonte at Ontario Center Development Concept, February 2006. 2Water demand rates from Preliminary Sewer and Water Demand Study for Rancho Piemonte (SB&O, Inc.) January 2006. 3Commercial water demand rate of 483 GPD/thousand square feet (TSF) derived from Final Environmental Impact Report #88-2 for the Ontario Center (P&D Technologies) October 1990, SCH #890410009, Table III-6, “Domestic Water Consumption Ultimate Development,” Page III, and the POCA, Table 2-2, Estimated Water Demand Piemonte at Ontario Center Project Additionally, maximum allowable building coverage for the Project site under the adopted OCSP is 60 percent, as averaged over the net area of each urban commercial PA. Based on the Project proposed 71,200SF of combined commercial development as shown in Table 2-3, and compared to the maximum allowable commercial development intensity of the remaining 1,772,000 SF of urban commercial as permitted under the OCSP, the Project proposed a building coverage for the Project site of 4.0 percent, or 56 percent less commercial building coverage than permitted under the OCSP.

Based on the preceding discussions, development intensities realized under the proposed Project would be no greater than those anticipated under the adopted OCSP. Further, related environmental effects of the proposed Project would be no greater than, and would be reduced, when compared to anticipated environmental effects that would result under commercial development of the site envisioned under the adopted OCSP, and also the POCA and POOC as these last two originally proposed greater development intensity of the site than the proposed Project.

Circulation Plan Concept
The Project would utilize the existing private and public circulation system (namely Ontario Center Parkway, Via Piemonte, Via Asti, Concours Street, and Fourth Street) and would follow the established design standards for vehicular and pedestrian movement. Following are summary descriptions of both the vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems.

Vehicular Circulation
Primary accessto the Project would be provided via public roadways that border the Project site, including Haven Avenue to the west, Concours Street to the south, and Fourth Street to the north. Within the Project site, access to individual uses would be provided by privately owned and maintained streets, as well as the public Ontario Center Parkway. Private streets within the Project site would provide for and incorporate necessary access/public utilities easements.

Pedestrian Circulation
The proposed Project will make use of the existing pedestrian network which provides connections, to and supports interaction, between the various Project land uses. The Project pedestrian network largely parallels the serving roadway network, with additional internal pedestrian linkages providing connections between the Project land uses. Defined connections are also provided where the Project pedestrian network connects to other existing pedestrian paths.

The pedestrian network will be enhanced with landscaping and would typically include ornamental grasses, groundcover, and shrubs, all of which are thematically employed throughout the Project site. 330
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 2-7 Project Description

2.4 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
Figures 9 and 10 provide a sense of landscaping features and their locations within the proposed Project.

The proposed landscape would be consistent with the design guidelines of the Specific Plan, specifically as noted as Operational Design Features E-DF-4, and those design elements as noted in Table 1-1.

2.5 PROJECT PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
Buildings and Facilities
Construction of the proposed Project may occur in more than one phase. Construction is anticipated to begin during year 2022.

Utilities and Infrastructure
The Project site and its vicinity is fully developed, and utilities infrastructure have been previously installed and fitted to accommodate the maximum planned development under the CECA, POCA, and POOC.

According to the OCSP and the Certified EIR, maximum allowed development intensity within Statistical Area “E” was 2,200,000 SF, while Statistical Area “D” maximum allowed intensity was 640,000 SF. As previously noted, the proposed Project would introduce a mixed-use development with a lower development intensity of 71,200 SF of commercial and 694 multi-family apartment units. All roadway improvements (public and private) have been previously developed with the implementation of the existing uses.

Parks and Open Space
Public and private urban open/common space areas within the Project would be completed concurrent with, and largely as a consequence of, completion of adjacent building and facilities within the Project area. In this sense, open/common space areas would support and complement other aspects of the Project in a manner and fashion consistent with likely demands for, and use of, these facilities. In addition, the Project would comply with applicable City/OCSP park dedication/in-lieu fee payment requirements.

2.6 INTENDED USE OF THIS ADDENDUM, PROJECT DISCRETIONARY

ACTIONS
Use of this Addendum
This EIR Addendum will serve as the City of Ontario’s environmental review of the Project as required under CEQA. The City may also employ this Addendum EIR in any subsequent review or consideration of the individual development proposals within the Project area.

Project Discretionary Actions, Permits, Consultation
Discretionary actions, permit and related consultation(s) necessary to approve and implement the Project include, but are not limited to, the following.

2.6.2.1 Discretionary Actions
331
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 2-8 Project Description
CEQA Section 15124 states in pertinent part that if “a public agency must make more than one decision on a project, all its decisions subject to CEQA should be listed.” Requested decisions, or discretionary actions, necessary to realize the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project at The Ontario Center include the following:
• Certification of this Addendum to the Ontario Center EIR; • Adoption of the -Piemonte Overlay at Ontario Center Specific Plan Amendment (File no. PSPA21-001);
• Approval of Parcel Maps;
• Approval of Tract Map(s) for condominium purposes;
• Development Plan Approvals for various development parcels; • Approval of the Project Development Agreement;
• Approval of Infrastructure Improvement Plan, including but not limited to: roads, sewer, water, and stormwater management systems;
• Approval of Conditional Use Permit(s).

2.6.2.2 Consultation and Permits
CEQA Section 15124 also states that environmental documentation should, to the extent known, list other permits or approvals required to implement the Project. Based on the current Project design concept, in addition to City permits and approvals, anticipated permits necessary to realize the proposal will likely include, but are not limited to the following:
• Permitting may be required by/through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) pursuant to requirements of the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit;
• Permitting may be required by/through the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for certain equipment or land uses that may be implemented within the Project area. • Various construction, grading, and encroachment permits allowing implementation of the Project facilities.
332
Figure 3: Local Vicinity Map
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
F G
C D
A
B
333
Figure 4: Development Concept - Lot A
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
Unit Count - Total 384
120 - 2 Bedroom
180 - 1 Bedroom
84 - Studio
Parking Count - Total: 504
Retail Area: 25,870 ft²
Net Residential Area: 268,181 ft²
A
□ 1
ann
m \
[/%
-
\ A
a
z-4*t
i
>■?
£
a --
&
yvM; sSfeSL
s^f* A: .U
\
^4^ P
\
$
■■$■ 4 Sf§ 'P
o
/
tfl M* u
3 \ ; X .
m ,#; flv p
/ r
: V" _ - Vi
■■ ''V' --
v
/ N
S
'W.
■ y
X v
v Pf.-T'
WEtiW I
VS S28>4
'ii
l
'7
V
_ ___ ___
Kimley»>Horn
334
Figure 5: Development Concept - Lot B
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
Unit Count - Total 112
19 - 3 Bedroom
63 - 2 Bedroom
30 - 1 Bedroom
Parking Count - Total: 194
Retail Area: 20,802 ft²
B Net Residential Area: 111,021 ft²
Il 1
,'
3,A
I • mm if
I
% V
L«- m
A
ifl ■
**
* tv t
* * .j i
A mmrgv •t:
isfepi x
-A /;/
% *•. '/.-a Lfc H
c' 4
#
, v
r
/ V or
K v
T
x
. _ ____
Kimley»>Horn
335
Figure 6: Development Concept - Lot C
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
C
Unit Count - Total 94
44 - 2 Bedroom
32 - 1 Bedroom
18 - Studios
Parking Count - Total: 138
Retail Area: 11,047 ft²
Net Residential Area: 75,866 ft²
B n
i
-
tK
VC';
■ p<t9
1^ i- up
W\w & hi
mhh iUm
yMd i.
\A
W \ * i
w Kib
mdbl
A / WP
o
7 ^ i w
\
m>- t} ■' m. r
i£ ti A •:
*
n
,
r.
iTrSisa^-.
-f% to
.>
_ Ji. _
Kimley»>Hor
336
Figure 7: Development Concept - Lot D
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
Unit Count - Total 104
58 - 2 Bedroom
42 - 1 Bedroom
4 - Studios
Parking Count - Total: 162
Retail Area: 14,095 ft²
Net Residential Area: 85,305 ft²
D
f
1NR 1 0
h
..
\/%
%
r
.
£
/ A '
fiW 1" m Vr
j* m 'y
t w y r •-
i
.'
Ulb .
b ,
lb ,n
i"
-jjr w y
V
S’
/ . r
■*
•?V ^
A
<\ or J
Kimley»>Horn
337
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
February 2022 Environmental Analysis

3.0 Environmental Analysis
338
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-1 Environmental Analysis

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

3.1 INTRODUCTION
Land uses and development characteristics of the proposed Project are similar in scope but lower in intensity to development of the subject site anticipated under the OCSP, the CECA, POCA, and POOC.

Potential environmental impacts of the OCSP were comprehensively assessed in the Certified EIR for the Ontario Center, State Clearinghouse No. 89041009 (Certified EIR). The following discussions summarize potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project within the context of the environmental analysis presented in the Certified EIR. As demonstrated by the subsequent environmental analysis, the Project would not result in any new, different, or substantially increased impacts than those that were considered and addressed in the Certified EIR, CECA, POCA, or the POOC.

3.2 ALLOWED AND PROPOSED MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
The proposed Project will occupy a portion of Statistical Area “E” of the OCSP. The Certified EIR addressed potential impacts that would result from implementation of a calculated maximum allowable development intensity of the Statistical Area “E,” as provided for under the OCSP. The referenced maximum allowable development intensity considered in the Certified EIR included up to 2,200,000 SF of regional retail center.

The proposed Project would realize a different mix of urban commercial uses than those originally envisioned under the OCSP as well as the proposed Project would incorporate multi-family residential units which is a consistent use for the site based on the previously approved CECA, POCA, and POOC.

However, as demonstrated within this Addendum, development intensity of the proposed Project will not exceed the maximum allowable development intensity considered under the Certified EIR, the CECA, POCA, and POOC for both the multi-family and commercial components.

3.3 ALLOWED AND PROPOSED LAND USES
The Project site was originally designated as “Urban Commercial” by the OCSP. Permitted uses within the Urban Commercial land use designation include retail and service-oriented businesses; administrative, professional and medical offices; institutional, financial and governmental facilities; indoor and outdoor restaurants and cocktail lounges; theaters and entertainment complexes; parking lots and parking facilities; outdoor vendors; automobile services and service stations; hotels, motels and motor inns; conference and convention facilities; medical and hospital facilities; residential dwellings (above the ground floor); trade schools; and community facilities, such as libraries, police or fire stations.

As presented in Addendum Section 2.0, Project Description, the CECA, POCA, and later the POOC amended the original OCSP which proposed uses that were consistent with the Urban Commercial land use designation and intent of the OCSP to provide for an integrated mixed-use urban commercial center within the City while also adding multi-family residential uses. As such, in order to realize the Project as proposed in the POCA, certain development standards of the OCSP were amended to allow for specific facilities configurations and design elements proposed by the POCA. As discussed subsequently in this Addendum, land uses realized under the proposed Project would not generate any new or additional 339
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-2 Environmental Analysis
environmental impacts that were not previously considered and addressed in the Certified EIR, the CECA, POCA, or the POOC.

3.4 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION, DOCUMENTS

INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Section 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines permits and encourages that an environmental document incorporate by reference other documents that provide relevant data. The documents outlined in this section are hereby incorporated by reference, and the pertinent material from each is summarized throughout this Addendum. All documents incorporated by reference are available from the Planning Department at the City of Ontario, located at 303 East “B” Street, Ontario, CA 91764. • Ontario General Plan Final EIR/Master Environmental Assessment. The Ontario General Plan Final EIR/Master Environmental Assessment provides an overall description of City’s environmental setting; addresses potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the City General Plan under buildout conditions; and identifies applicable policies and implementation programs which act to reduce potentially significant environmental effects resulting from General Plan implementation/buildout. Background information and areawide analyses presented in the Ontario General Plan Final EIR/Master Environmental Assessment provide context for the Piemonte at Ontario Center Project and its potential environmental effects.
• Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) No. 88-2 (Certified EIR) for The Ontario Center Specific Plan (OCSP), 1990. The Final Environmental Impact Report for the OCSP identifies anticipated environmental impacts resulting from the Specific Plan and presents a responsive Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) or Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The MMP/MMRP was developed to avoid or minimize the extent and severity of anticipated impacts of the Specific Plan.

Information and analysis presented in the Final EIR including the MMP provide the basis and context for evaluation of the Adept-Piemonte at Ontario Center Project’s (proposed Project) potential environmental impacts. As discussed in this Addendum, the proposed Project will not result in any new or substantially different environmental impacts than were previously considered and addressed in the Final EIR for the OCSP. As also presented in this Addendum, the proposed Project would comply with, and implement all applicable mitigation measures presented in the OCSP Final EIR MMP/MMRP.
• Community Event Center Addendum to the Certified EIR. The Community Events Center Addendum (CECA) to the Certified EIR was certified February 1, 2006, and is relevant to the proposed Project in that it was prepared in response to an application for the development of the City of Ontario Community Events Center. This project proposed the development of a 214,420 square foot multi-purpose indoor stadium and events center, with fixed seating for approximately 9,000 persons, associated pedestrian plazas, landscaping, off-street parking facilities for approximately 2,100 automobiles and a truck loading/unloading area, with related truck parking and outdoor storage areas and provides an updated description of the encompassing OCSP and establishes a general framework for comparative analysis resulting from recent and previous 340
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-3 Environmental Analysis
amendment(s) to the Specific Plan; refer to Figure 8, Community Events Center Specific Plan (CECA). The CECA area is currently developed with the Toyota Arena and vehicle parking areas.

The CECA eastern vehicle parking areas are anticipated to host the proposed Project portions identified as Lots “A and B”; refer to Figure 9, Project Site Plan (Lots A and B) and Figure 10, Project Site Plan (Lots C and D).
• Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum to the Certified EIR. The Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum (POCA) to the Certified EIR project was certified in February 2006 and is relevant to the proposed Project in that it amended Statistical Areas “D and E.” In 2004, an application was made by Panattoni Development to the City of Ontario for an urban character mixed-use project, to be constructed on an approximately 88-acre site located between Fourth Street and I-10, exclusive of the then approved Fairfield/Sares-Regis residential project, and west of the existing Kohl’s retail center. The POCA provides an updated description of the encompassing OCSP and establishes a general framework for comparative analysis resulting from recent and previous amendment(s) to the Specific Plan; refer to Figure 11, Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum Specific Plan (POCA). The POCA encompassed a large northeast portion of the OCSP Statistical Area “E.” This area is anticipated to host Lots C, D, F, and G of the proposed Project; refer to Figure

5. • Piemonte Overlay at OCSP (PSPA 16-003). More recently, the Piemonte Overlay at Ontario Center (POOC) Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (PSPA 16-003) was certified on May 16, 2017, and is relevant to the proposed Project in that it also amended Statistical Areas “D and E.” The project proponent submitted a request for approval of an amendment to the OCSP, which revised the land use map and development concept of the POCA area to facilitate the development of the balance of the 84-acre site. Like the POCA, this amendment proposed approximately 1.3 million square feet of retail, office, hotel, and entertainment uses and 791 multi-family DUs. The 791 multi-family DUs were slightly fewer DU than the quantity allowed by the POCA. The POOC amended the land use configuration of the same footprint considered in the POCA. The POCA provides an updated description of the encompassing OCSP and establishes a general framework for comparative analysis resulting from recent and previous amendment(s) to the OCSP; refer to Figure 12, Piemonte Overlay at Ontario Center Specific Plan (POOC). Identical to the POCA project area, the POOC MND encompassed the same large portion of the OCSP Statistical Areas “D and E.” The portion of the OCSP that is within Statistical Area “E” is anticipated to host Lots C, D, F, and G of the proposed Project, as shown in Figure 2.

3.5 ENVIRONMENTAL TOPICS
The Certified EIR addressed the following major environmental topics: land use and planning, socioeconomics, public services, public utilities, traffic and circulation, biology, air quality, noise, aesthetics, seismicity, hydrology, and water quality. As presented in Table 1-1 of this Addendum, the Certified EIR proposed mitigation measures for all potentially significant impacts. All applicable mitigation measures identified in Table 1-1 will be implemented by the Adept-Piemonte at Ontario Center Project.

For each environmental topic presented in the Certified EIR, the following analyses substantiate the proposed Project’s consistency with development envisioned under the OCSP Project and analyzed in the Certified EIR.
341
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-4 Environmental Analysis
Land Use and Planning
The Certified EIR considered potential land use/planning impacts of the OCSP. The current General Plan Land Use designation is “Mixed Use Ontario Center” and the subject site has a specific plan land use of “OCSP, Urban Commercial Land Use – Piemonte Overlay.” As previously noted, under this General Plan Land Use designation, a maximum of 2,840,000 square-feet (SF) of Urban Commercial uses are permitted within Statistical Areas D and E combined or 2,200,000 SF of Urban Commercial within Statistical Area E only, of the encompassing OCSP. As discussed in the Certified EIR for the OCSP, this upper limit of development intensity is based primarily on the carrying capacities of the Specific Plan roadways and utilities systems.

The OCSP Urban Commercial land use designation provides for development of tourist-related commercial uses, high and medium-rise office buildings, entertainment/recreation clusters, and highdensity residential uses integrated with adjacent uses. The Project proposes land uses and development concepts that are consistent with development envisioned under and encouraged by the Urban Commercial land use designation but would amend the OCSP to establish the definitive mix of uses in the proposed Adept-Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum EIR Project.

3.5.1.1 Development Intensity
According to the POCA, under the adopted OCSP, the Statistical Areas D and E could accommodate up to 2,840,000 SF of development intensity.2 Of the maximum 2,840,000 SF of development intensity allowed within Statistical Areas “D and E,” an estimated 1,068,000 SF existed at the time the POCA was certified, or was anticipated under other development proposals.3The remaining approximately 1,772,000 SF of allowable development intensity provides a baseline for comparison of development intensities that could be realized under the current OCSP, vis-a-vis development that is proposed under the Project.

As currently envisioned, the proposed Project would realize approximately 71,200 SF of commercial and 540,373 SF of multi-family residential (694 units). Excluding the Project’s proposed residential uses, the approximately 71,200 SF of commercial uses that would be realized under the Project are consistent with uses envisioned under the OCSP, and would comprise 1,700,800 SF less than the calculated 1,772,000 SF of remaining allowable maximum development intensity for Statistical Areas D and E. Therefore, because of the 694 multi-family DUs proposed, the Project is determined to be no more intense than the 1,700,800 SF balance referenced above, it can be reasonably inferred that the Project in total would not exceed the remaining allowable maximum development intensity for Statistical Areas D and E, refer to Table 2-3.

An approximation of relative development intensity was typically discerned by comparing defining characteristics of land uses, such as traffic generation, water demand, and wastewater generation rates.

These factors were particularly appropriate when assessing the Project’s relative development intensity, in that the upper limit of development intensity defined for the OCSP is founded largely on estimated 2 Ontario Center Specific Plan, Page 15, Table 3-A “Development Intensity.” 3 Approximately 108,000 s.f. is developed as “Khol’s”; an estimated 530,000 s.f. in development intensity is allocated for the 32-acre Fairfield/Sares-Regis residential project; and an estimated 430,000 s.f. is allocated for the 28.85-acre future OCEC project. Assumes an average

0.38 FAR over aggregated Statistical Areas D and E, based on maximum allowable development intensity of 2.86 million square feet on approximately 153.25 acres.
342
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-5 Environmental Analysis
roadway and water/sewer carrying capacities. Water/sewer demands of the Project, as compared to water/sewer demands resulting from correlating maximum buildout of urban commercial uses per the adopted OCSP are summarized below.

Regarding traffic/trip generation, in response to Senate Bill (SB) 743, the California Natural Resource Agency (CNRA) certified and adopted new CEQA Guidelines in December 2018 which now identify Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate metric to evaluate any give project's transportation impact under CEQA (Section 15064.3). Effective July 1, 2020, the previous CEQA metric of Level of Service (LOS), typically measured in terms of automobile delay, roadway capacity and congestion, generally will no longer constitute a significant environmental impact. The City of Ontario has adopted guidelines to provide recommendations in the form of and methodology and thresholds of significance for identifying VMT related impacts. The proposed Project is subject to a VMT analysis and will adhere to the recommendations and practices described in the City of Ontario Planning Commission Resolution No. PC20-021 (May 26, 2020).

As discussed in greater detail at Section 3.5.5, Traffic and Circulation, total average daily traffic that would be generated by the Project is approximately 95 percent less than would otherwise result under buildout of the subject site per the maximum development intensities allowed under the OCSP. Development intensity of the Project, as characterized by traffic generation, is therefore substantially reduced when compared to maximum allowable development intensities identified under the OCSP. This reduction in traffic generation rates is due largely to the fact that the Project will implement an integrated residential component, which would result in substantially reduced daily trips, and p.m. peak-hour trip generation rates compared to trip generation rates that would result from maximum allowable commercial intensities on the same acreage. Relative traffic generation rates would be substantially reduced because of the Project’s residential component.

Similarly, because of the large difference in development intensities between the maximum allowed under the OCSP and the Certified EIR and the proposed Project, it is anticipated that water demands and wastewater generation rates when compared to maximum allowable commercial intensities on the same acreage would also be reduced. More specifically, it is anticipated that 694 multi-family units and 71,200 SF of commercial uses would result in mean annual water demands of approximately 332,729 GPD; refer to Table 2-4. In contrast, if the same acreage was developed with Urban Commercial uses at the maximum allowable development intensity of 1,772,000 SF (2,200,000 SF – 428,000 SF of existing development = 1,772,000 SF of remaining buildable SF), water demands would be approximately 855,876 GPD.

As wastewater generation is a direct function of water consumption, it can be anticipated that the Project’s residential component would also result in lower wastewater generation than would result under maximum development of the same acreage with commercial uses, or under the previously approved CECA, POCA, or POOC which all assumed a higher development intensity than the proposed Project, as shown in Table 2-2.

If considered independently then, the Project’s residential uses would result in decreased water/sewer demands compared to maximum development of the same acreage with commercial uses. When 343
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-6 Environmental Analysis
considered in the context of the total Project, the calculated water and sewer demands resulting from the Project residential land uses are minimal relatively to the permitted development under the approved OCSP. Total water demands of the Project land uses are summarized in Table 2-4.

Based on the preceding discussions, development intensities realized under the proposed Project would be no greater than those anticipated under the adopted OCSP. Further, related environmental effects of the proposed Project would be no greater than, and would likely be reduced, when compared to anticipated environmental effects that would result under commercial development of the site envisioned under the adopted OCSP.

3.5.1.2 Development Standards and Land Use Compatibility The Project proposes commercial and residential uses similar to those allowed for and envisioned under the OCSP Urban Commercial land use designation and under the POCA and POOC. Further, development concepts and plans articulated for the proposed Project are considered to be substantially consistent with the themes and standards of the approved OCSP, the General Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance. The Project does, however, propose to amend the OCSP to allow for facilities, configurations and design elements specific to the proposed Project.

As discussed previously in this Section, Statistical Areas “D and E” of the OCSP are designated as Urban Commercial land uses. Within the Urban Commercial land use designation, permitted uses include “high density residential uses integrated with adjacent uses.” [Ontario Center Specific Plan, Page 10] The Urban Commercial land use designation does not specify an upper limit to residential development densities, other than such development may not exceed the maximum allowable development intensity for the encompassing Statistical Area.

Further, all proposed residential units will be designed and constructed to achieve noise standards contained in the Ontario Municipal Code, as required under 4.2.1.13 (B). As presented above in Addendum Section 3.5.1.1, “Development Intensity,” the Project in total will not exceed the maximum allowable development intensity for Statistical Areas D and E, including water and sewer demands. Design and construction of water and sewer services available to the Project land uses will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of development permits, consistent with the requirements of

4.2.1.13 (C).

Multi-story, high-density residential development as proposed by the Project supports the intent of the OCSP to provide:
• A balance of employment, shopping, and housing opportunities, reducing the need for long commutes.
and
• A higher density housing orientation, recognizing trends toward smaller household size. [Ontario Center Specific Plan, Page 8]
More specifically, the considered residential units will be located immediately adjacent to the commercial/retail types of uses, and in this sense, the Project provides for an integrated balance of 344
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-7 Environmental Analysis
employment, shopping, and housing opportunities, and establishes a sense of community through collocation of residential uses and supporting retail/commercial/entertainment uses.

Association of the Project’s urban residential densities with commercial uses also promotes, and makes feasible pedestrian access throughout the Project area, acting to reduce reliance on private automobiles.

This is consistent with the intent of the OCSP to reduce dependence on private automobiles, with correlating reductions in VMT.

Residential development will reflect architectural themes and hardscape/landscape elements evidenced throughout the Project area, acting to visually tie these residential uses to other Project land uses. A direct visual/architectural tie is made between abutting residential areas. Multi-story residential uses will also reflect urban themes, building heights, and building masses evidenced elsewhere within the Project; refer to Figure 13, Elevations (Lots A and B) and Figure 14, Elevation (Lots C and D).

Lastly, it is noted that residential densities proposed by the Project (at least 40 units per acre) provide for efficient use of available land and recognize local and regional demographic trends towards smaller household sizes. As noted previously in this Section, proposed residential densities as described are achieved within the maximum allowable development intensities for Statistical Areas “D and E.” Summary
Development intensities proposed by the proposed Project are less than the maximum allowable development intensities considered in the Certified EIR. It will not be necessary for the proposed Project to modify the OCSP as the POCA was previously amended it in February 2006 and the POOC further amended it in May 2017 to allow for specific Project facilities configurations and design elements, to include certain allowances for construction of multi-story residential DUs, with ground floor units at a greater intensity than the currently proposed Project.

Land uses proposed by the proposed Project are considered to be consistent with the mix of land uses and development intent of the OCSP, POCA, and POOC, and would not result in land use impacts not already considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. On the basis of the preceding discussions, the Project will not create new, additional, or substantially different land use impacts than those identified within the Certified EIR. Therefore, no changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary.

Socioeconomics
The Certified EIR considered potential socioeconomics impacts of the OCSP. As a general note, it is recognized that the 2004 CEQA Guidelines no longer reflect “socioeconomics” as an environmental topic.

The relevant areas of discussion addressed previously under the heading of socioeconomics are now reflected in consideration of potential population, housing, and jobs/housing balance impacts, and related transportation and air quality impacts. Economic effects of the proposed Project would be considered only to the extent that they may result in adverse physical impacts.

Of the above considerations, localized effects of the Project will include increased housing availability, combined with supporting commercial, office, recreation, and entertainment uses. Localized effects will 345
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-8 Environmental Analysis
also include new employment potentials accruing from the Project’s non-residential land uses. Increased employment and housing availability resulting from the Project reflect areawide projections for continuing population and jobs growth within the City and region.

By integrating residential and business/commercial land uses, the Project supports City and areawide goals and policies providing for a balance of jobs and housing. One of the primary benefits of a balanced jobs/housing ratio within the region is a potential reduction in commute distances, as places of employment will be located closer to residential areas.

As the Project proposes land uses consistent with those allowed by the OCSP and would not result in development intensities greater than those considered in the Certified EIR, the Project will not result in any new or substantially different socioeconomic considerations than were addressed in the Certified EIR.

No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary, nor is there a need for any additional mitigation measures. Please also refer to Section 3.5.1, “Land Use.” Public Services
The Certified EIR considered potential public services impacts of the OCSP. As discussed under Addendum Section 3.5.1, “Land Use,” the Project proposes land use categories and development intensities contemplated under the adopted OCSP and Certified EIR. As land use categories and development intensities largely define demands for public services, it is anticipated that public services demand from the proposed Project would not exceed, nor be substantially different than, those considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. On this basis, the Project will not result in any new or substantially different public services impacts than were addressed in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary, nor is there a need for any additional mitigation measures. Please refer also to Addendum Section 3.5.1, “Land Use and Planning.”
Utilities
The Certified EIR considered potential utilities impacts of the OCSP. Defining examples of utilities demands of the Project, as compared to demands anticipated under the Certified EIR are presented in Addendum Section 3.5.1, “Land Use and Planning.” Under the cited topical areas of traffic generation, water demand, and wastewater generation, it is anticipated that impacts of the proposed Project would be less than those addressed under the maximum development intensities considered in the Certified EIR. It is anticipated that impacts to all other utilities would be similarly reduced under the proposed Project when compared to utilities demands resulting from maximum allowable development intensities for the subject site.

3.5.4.1 Infrastructure
Extensive utility infrastructure surrounds, and is available to, the Project site. In general, the existing infrastructure serving the Project site and vicinity has been sized to accommodate anticipated future development of the area and is adequately sized to serve the Project. Because the Project site has been previously developed with various uses, infrastructure is already in place. This section describes the existing backbone infrastructure system available to the Project site. Infrastructure systems described 346
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-9 Environmental Analysis
within this section include wastewater collection/ treatment, potable water distribution, recycled water distribution, and stormwater management/treatment.

3.5.4.2 Wastewater
Wastewater treatment services for the City of Ontario and other nearby communities are provided by Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). This Agency is responsible for treatment of wastewater generated by the Project. Wastewater will be transported to IEUA Regional Plant No. 1 (RP-1) via the City of Ontario wastewater collection and conveyance system. IEUA Regional Plant No. 1 is located south of the Pomona Freeway (SR-60) and west of Archibald Avenue. The backbone sanitary sewer system for the Project site and vicinity is made up of private and public sewer system components. Along the Project perimeter, public streets would accommodate sewer system improvements to be implemented by the Project.

A 24-inch IEUA sewer interceptor exists in Fourth Street along the northerly boundary of the Project site.

This interceptor captures all wastewater from north of Fourth Street within Rancho Cucamonga and transfers it west along Fourth Street. Therefore, the Project area does not accept any off-site wastewater from the north. All wastewater flows generated by the Project would be transported via 8-to-10- inch sewer lines to Concours Street. At Concours Street, these lines would connect to the existing 8-to-12- inch sewer mains. These mains currently connect to an 18-inch main, that in turn connects to the Inland Empire Boulevard sewer main to the south.4
The collection sewer main to the south of the Project site, originally called the Ontario Motor Speedway Outfall, was sized to handle flows from the site. This outfall line ultimately flows west along Inland Empire Boulevard then proceeds south beneath I-10. Sanitary sewer facilities constructed south of I-10 have previously been upgraded and sized to adequately handle development of the Project site and surrounding area.

With regard to Project-related wastewater system requirements, based on information presented in the POCA, the existing receiving wastewater transmission facilities within Concours Street have enough overall capacity to adequately convey wastewater generated by the POCA project as proposed. More specifically, as concluded in the POCA, the depth to diameter (d/D) design standard of 0.50 for these transmission facilities was maintained even with the addition of wastewater generated by the POCA project. The POCA further noted that it conservatively assumed 2.7 persons per dwelling unit, with a calculated wastewater generation rate of 100 gpd/person, or 270 gpd/DU which would have resulted in approximately 217,620 GPD of wastewater. However, approximately one-half of the Project dwelling units where originally anticipated to be of single bedroom configuration(s), and as such would have likely resulted in reduced overall resident populations with correlating reductions in wastewater generation.

The Project proposes to construct 694 multi-family DU (111 DU less than the previously approved by the POCA) and at the 270 gpd/DU would equate to approximately 186,570 GPD of wastewater. Based on the previous data, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate approximately nine percent less GPD of wastewater compared to the POCA. As wastewater generation is a direct function of water consumption, it can be anticipated that the Project would similarly result in less wastewater generation than would the 4 Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) No. 88-2 (Certified EIR) for The Ontario Center Specific, 1990. 347
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-10 Environmental Analysis
maximum development of the same acreage with commercial-office uses or compared to the OCSP, POCA, and POOC since these all proposed a greater development intensity than the Project site.

3.5.4.3 Water Service
Water service to the Project site is provided by the City of Ontario. Existing water facilities include mains located in both Fourth Street and Concours Street. A 12-inch main in Fourth Street serves properties north of the Project site, in Rancho Cucamonga. An existing City of Ontario 18-inch main located in Fourth Street serves the Project site. Fourth Street also contains a 36-inch City of Ontario transmission main.

Additionally, Concours Street contains a 16-inch water main that is used to serve the Project site. The POCA concludes that the existing water system infrastructure surrounding the general site is adequate to serve the Project area. Existing water infrastructure will be utilized to provide water to the proposed Project buildings.5

3.5.4.4 Recycled/Reclaimed Water System
Overview
The use of recycled water is regulated through the California Code of Regulations (CCR). Pertinent excerpts from Titles 17 and 22 of the CCR statutes are compiled in the California Health Laws related to Recycled Water, also referred to as "The Purple Book," which was updated in June 2001. The California Water Code (Section13550) states that use of potable water in instances where non-potable water applications are appropriate and feasible is “a waste of water if recycled water is of adequate quality and is available for these (non- potable) uses and can be furnished at a reasonable cost to the user.” Use of recycled water is also feasible and recommended if it “is not detrimental to public health and will not adversely affect downstream water rights, degrade water quality, and is not injurious to plant life, fish, and wildlife.” In this regard, regulations and guidelines for recycled water and recycled water purveyors have been established by the California Department of Health Services (DHS) and are published in the CCR. These regulations and guidelines establish recycled water treatment requirements, quality standards, and source reliability criteria, thereby ensuring protection and preservation of the public health and welfare. The IEUA provides reclaimed water to the City of Ontario.

Water demands (potable and non-potable) are expected to increase in the City of Ontario concurrent with ongoing and increasing development pressures. Accordingly, and to release potable water supplies for applications where it is required, reclaimed water should increasingly replace use of potable water where use of non-potable water is determined to be feasible and appropriate. Non-potable water applications typically include irrigation, recreation lakes and ponds, cooling towers, air conditioners, evaporative condensers, flushing toilets, decorative fountains, commercial laundries, commercial car washes, washing down roads or sidewalks, and firefighting. The IEUA treats its wastewater to tertiary treatment standards including disinfections at four treatment plants.
5 Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) No. 88-2 (Certified EIR) for The Ontario Center Specific, 1990. 348
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-11 Environmental Analysis
Existing Reclaimed Water System
Nearest to the Project are the IUEA reclaimed water main which is installed in Sixth Street, a short segment of reclaimed water line in Haven Avenue between Sixth and Fourth Streets, with another segment located within Fourth Street west of Haven Avenue. More specifically, a 30-inch reclaimed water main exists in Haven Avenue, turning west in Fourth Street. A 12-inch reclaimed water lateral exists in Milliken that terminates near Fourth Street. An 8-inch dry reclaimed water line has been installed in the east portion of Concours, from station 65+09.72 near Founder’s Park extending to Milliken Avenue. This dry reclaimed water line was installed as part of the Concours street improvements in 2002.

Reclaimed Water System Improvements
The POCA project constructed new reclaimed water facilities within the Project site, as well as construction of the remaining planned connecting segment(s) in Milliken, Concours and Haven. Reclaimed water system improvements realized under the POCA include the following:
• An extension of the reclaimed water lateral from Milliken Avenue and Fourth Street, connecting to the dry reclaimed water line in Concours Street.
• Construction of the remaining portion of the reclaimed water main in Concours Street from Haven Avenue, extending to station 65+09.72 near Founder’s Fountain. • Completed the reclaimed water loop by constructing a segment from Haven Avenue and Fourth Street extending to Concours Street.
• Construct a reclaimed water loop in Public Street “A” to each intersection of Concours Street. • Reclaimed water distribution lines will be extended northerly from Concours Street into the Project site and will be located within Street “A” and Street “C.” Reclaimed water lines within public streets are maintained by the City of Ontario. According to the POCA, the ownership and maintenance of common reclaimed water system components and lines within the Project site will be the responsibility of the Piemonte at Ontario Center Property Owners Association, established pursuant to the Piemonte Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R’s).

3.5.4.5 Stormwater Management
The following discussions describe existing stormwater management facilities serving the Project area and identify stormwater conveyance facilities and stormwater quality treatment systems and management practices required of the Project. As a general note, Project-related improvements and connections located within public streets are maintained by the City. However, the ownership and maintenance of common stormwater system components and lines, as well as water quality treatment facilities within the Project site, are the responsibility of the Project.

3.5.4.6 Stormwater Collection and Conveyance Facilities The proposed Project comprises the central portion of the OCSP. Drainage in the area flows in a generally north to south direction. North of the Project site, an existing storm drain is located in Fourth Street. This storm drain collects and transports all drainage flows from the north and west to Guasti Park. As such, the Project would not have to accommodate stormwater flows from the north. Stormwater runoff from the 349
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-12 Environmental Analysis
Project site would drain southerly to Concours Street. Receiving reinforced concrete pipe(rcp) drainage facilities are located within Concours Street, and range in size from 48-inches in diameter to 72-inches in diameter. Flows from these Concours facilities empty into a 9-foot by 6-foot reinforced concrete box (rcb).

Flows then continue southerly toward Inland Empire Boulevard, then westerly to Mercedes Lane, and then southerly beneath I-10 in a 12-foot by 7-foot rcb to Lower Deer Creek Channel. Lower Deer Creek Channel confluences with Cucamonga Creek Channel and flows to the Prado Basin.6 The POCA concluded that the existing storm drainage facilities serving the Project site and vicinity have been previously sized to accommodate the proposed development. The POCA noted that as part of the site development, there would be construction of additional internal drainage system improvements, which connect to the existing area-wide drainage system. Connection points to the existing system would have been located so as to take full advantage of available carrying capacities. Because the POCA proposed a higher intensity than the proposed Project, it is anticipated that stormwater collection and conveyance facilities would be adequate to accommodate the proposed Project.

3.5.4.7 Stormwater Treatment/Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) In addition to construction of required stormwater conveyance facilities described above, the City of Ontario and the governing Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) require that the Project incorporate certain stormwater quality treatment facilities and water quality management practices, as discussed below.

Overview
The Santa Ana RWQCB, under Order Number R8- 2002-0012, NPDES Permit No. CAS618036, requires postconstruction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented for new development and significant redevelopment, for both private and public agency projects. The purpose of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is to develop and implement a program, including application of BMPs, which minimizes the potential detrimental effects of urban stormwater runoff on the beneficial uses of receiving waters, including potential effects of increased pollutant loads and changes in hydrology.

Potentially adverse effects on receiving waters may be minimized through the implementation of site designs which minimize impervious surface areas and maximize onsite infiltration, resulting in corollary reductions in total stormwater runoff discharge volumes and rates and associated pollutant transport.

Potential impacts to receiving waters are further reduced through implementation of source control BMPs, on-site structural treatment control BMPS, and participation in regional or watershed based structural treatment control BMPs.

Previous development of the site realized under the POCA met applicable RWQCB criteria for preparation and implementation of a WQMP. In this regard, the proposed Project will also incorporate any combination of site designs, source controls, and/or treatment control BMPs. Stormwater quality and 6 Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) No. 88-2 (Certified EIR) for The Ontario Center Specific, 1990. 350
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-13 Environmental Analysis
treatment requirements may also be realized through Project participation in a regionally-based treatment program which addresses all identified pollutants and hydrologic conditions of concerns.

Project-related Stormwater Treatment Requirements
The proposed Project is located within the Santa Ana Basin, designated as Region 8 by the RWQCB, and is tributary to Lower Deer Creek, the Chris Basin, Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, Mill Creek, the Prado Flood Control Basin, and finally the Santa Ana River. In accordance with the Clean Water Act, the State of California maintains a list of impaired water bodies and the pollutant causing the impairment.

The Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel is included on the State’s list of impaired water bodies because of high coliform content. Mill Creek is also included on the impaired water body’s list for nutrients, suspended solids, and pathogens. Because these receiving waters (which are tributary to the Project) are impaired, the Project must incorporate BMPs that are rated high to medium in effectiveness for reducing the impairments. This assures a no net loading on the affected tributaries and ensures that there are no additional pollutants added to the already impaired water bodies. Additionally, this Project is subject to the latest trash capture requirements from the State and RWQCB.

Project-Related Stormwater Treatment Improvements
The proposed Project would accomplish mandated stormwater quality standards and mitigate pollutants of concern through the use of stormwater clarifiers and underground infiltration systems on each individual parcel. All proposed treatment facilities would be designed and implemented consistent with City and RWQCB requirements. Additionally, this Project shall implement the appropriate trash capture devices in order to comply with the latest trash capture requirements.

Based on the preceding discussion, the proposed Project would not result in any new, increased or substantially different impacts to utilities than those considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary, nor is there a need for any additional mitigation measures. Please refer also to Addendum Section 3.5.1, Land Use and Planning.

Traffic and Circulation
The Certified EIR considered potential traffic/circulation impacts of the OCSP. To determine relative traffic impacts resulting from the Project vis-a-vis traffic/circulation impacts identified in the Certified EIR, a detailed analysis was conducted to determine the number of vehicular trips that will be generated by the proposed Project (please refer to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated September 17, 2021, included in this Addendum as Appendix A). This trip generation was then compared to the potential trip generation of correlating maximum development intensities considered in the Certified EIR.

Specifically, Statistical Area “E” is listed in the OCSP as having an allowable maximum development intensity of 2,200,000 SF, while Statistical Area “D” is listed as having an allowable maximum development intensity of 640,000 SF. Land uses in both Statistical Areas are defined as “Urban Commercial.” For the purposes of developing correlating trip generation rates, Project-related trip generation calculations 351
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-14 Environmental Analysis
exclude areas within Statistical Areas E and D that are currently developed. As noted in the Statistical Areas included below:
• A 32-acre site between Fourth Street and Concours Street, on either side of Duesenberg Drive (known as the Fairfield/Sares-Regis development which includes 800 multi-family DUs located within Statistical Area D).
• An approximately 26-acre parcel (Parcel 7) north of Concours Street that has been developed by the City of Ontario with an arena within Statistical Area E. • A site in the south-west quadrant of the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Fourth Street, which has been developed with just under 108,000 square feet of retail/restaurant uses anchored by a Kohl’s’ department store located within Statistical Area E.

Traffic generation for the OCSP is shown in Table 3-1, Summary of OCSP Trip Generation, below:

Table 3-1: Summary of OCSP Trip Generation
Development Land Use
(ITE Code) Quantity Units2
AM PM Daily
In Out Total In Out Total
OCSP Assumptions
Urban Commercial
(OCSP Stat. Area E) General Retail 2,220.000 TSF 1,382 884 2,266 3,960 4,290 8,250 94,468 Urban Commercial
(OCSP Stat. Area D) General Retail 640.000 TSF 402 257 659 1,152 1,248 2,400 27,482 Specific Plan Trip Generation Total 1,784 1,141 2,925 5,112 5,538 10,650 121,950 1 Source:

Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum. February 2006. Table 1, Ontario Center Specific Plan (OCSC) Project Trip Generation, pag e 136. 2021 ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition)
2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
DU = Dwelling Units
3 Source: 2017 ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition) As noted in Table 3-2, above, Statistical Areas “ D and E” were anticipated to generate 121,950 weekly trips, with 2,925 Weekday AM Peak Hour trips and 10,650 Weekday PM Peak Hour trips. Table 3-2, Summary of OCSP Project Trip Generation Available for Future Land Uses, shows the trip generation assumed to be available for other/new projects to be developed within Statistical Areas “D and E” of the OCSP. In this instance, the proposed Project’s forecast trip generation would be compared against the trip generation assumed to be available for other/new projects, as shown in Table 3-2, below.

Table 3-2: Summary of OCSP Project Trip Generation Available for Future Land Uses Development Land Use
(ITE Code) Quantity Units2
AM PM
Daily In Out Total In Out Total
OCSP Assumptions
Urban Commercial
(OCSP Stat. Area E) General Retail 2,220.000 TSF 1,382 884 2,266 3,960 4,290 8,250 94,468 Urban Commercial
(OCSP Stat. Area D)
General Retail 640.000 TSF 402 257 659 1,152 1,248 2,400 27,482 Specific Plan Trip Generation Total 1,784 1,141 2,925 5,112 5,538 10,650 121,950 352
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-15 Environmental Analysis
Development Land Use
(ITE Code) Quantity Units2
AM PM
Daily In Out Total In Out Total
OCSP Assumptions
Developed / Planned Areas
955 N. Diesenberg Dr.
(Vintage Apartments)
Multifamily
Housing (LowRise) (220)309 DU 30 94 124 99 58 157 2,083 950 N. Diesember Dr.
(Camden Landmark
Apartments)
Multifamily
Housing (LowRise) (220)491 DU 47 149 196 158 93 251 3,309 4000 E. Ontario Center
Parkway (Arena) Arena (460)3 8,000 Seats NA NA NA 374 666 1,040 NA 901 N. Via Piemonte
(5-Story Office)
General Office
(710) 125.685 TSF 168 23 191 31 150 181 1,362
900 N. Via Piemonte
(Marriott - Element
Ontario Hotel)
Hotel (310) 131 Rooms 34 27 61 39 38 77 1,047
1051 N. Milliken Ave.
(Kohl's)
Shopping
Center
(820)

96.736 TSF 50 31 81 158 171 329 3,580
1041 N. Milliken Ave.
(Starbucks) 1.500 TSF 1 0 1 2 3 5 56
1021 N. Milliken Ave.
(Applebee's) 4.603 TSF 2 1 3 8 8 16 170
4290 E. Fourth St.
(El Pollo Loco)

2.406 TSF 1 1 2 4 4 8 89
4275 E. Concours St.
(Home
Thai/Professional
Nail/Sunrise
Optometry)

8.528 TSF 4 3 7 14 15 29 316
4295 E. Concours St.
(Comerica Bank) 3.262 TSF 2 1 3 5 6 11 121
4150 E. Fourth St.
(Spa/Wax
Center/Weight
Watchers)

8.385 TSF 4 3 7 14 15 29 310
4190 E. Forth St.
(Jeweler/Hair
Salon/Dentist)

7.320 TSF 4 2 6 12 13 25 271
4240 E. Fourth St.
(Wells Fargo) 4.845 TSF 3 2 5 8 9 17 179
4120 E. Fourth St. (Big
Al's/Petsmart/DSW
Shoes)

91.280 TSF 48 29 77 149 161 310 3,378
4200 E. Fourth St.
(Target and Garden
Center)
151.741 TSF 79 48 127 248 268 516 5,616
SWC of N. Via Alba &
E. Via Villagio
Multifamily
Housing (LowRise) (220)72 DU 7 22 29 23 14 37 485
NEC of Ontario
Center Parkway & N.

Multifamily
Housing (Low110 DU 11 33 44 35 21 56 741
353
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-16 Environmental Analysis
Development Land Use
(ITE Code) Quantity Units2
AM PM
Daily In Out Total In Out Total
OCSP Assumptions
Via Alba Rise) (220)
Used-Up Allocation of Trips Total 495 469 964 1,381 1,713 3,094 23,113 Trips Available for Future Uses 1,289 672 1,961 3,731 3,825 7,556 98,837 1 Source:

As discussed within this Addendum Section 3.0, “Environmental Analysis,” total average daily traffic that would be generated by the proposed Project is forecast at 6,447 Weekday Daily Trips which include approximately 315 AM Peak Hour Trips and approximately 575 PM Peak Hour Trips. Additionally, the proposed Project is forecast to generate approximately 6,677 Saturday daily trips which include approximately 624 Saturday Peak Hour Trips.

After accounting for internal trip capture and applicable Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) pass-by trip rates, the proposed Project is forecast to generate approximately 5,691 Weekday Daily Trips with 300 Weekday AM Peak Hour Trips, and approximately 458 Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips. An internal trip capture reduction is applicable when a project site has more than one destination (such as the proposed Project), in which a person visits more than one destination onsite during the same visit.

Additionally, the proposed Project is forecast to generate approximately 5,813 Saturday daily trips which include approximately 490 Saturday Peak Hour trips. Compared to the originally anticipated and approved trip generation forecast for the Certified EIR/OCSP, the proposed Project would generate approximately

4.6 percent of the overall weekday daily trips and only 4.7 percent of Saturday trips compared to the Certified EIR/OCSP approved project.

Regarding the overall development intensity, the proposed Project is anticipated to be approximately 72 percent less intense than the OCSP, or only about 28 percent of the intensity would otherwise result under buildout of the Project site under the proposed Project per the maximum development intensities allowed under the OCSP for Statistical Areas “D and E.” Development intensity of the Project site, as characterized by traffic generation and intensity, is therefore substantially reduced when compared to maximum allowable development intensities identified under the OCSP. This reduction in traffic generation rates is due largely to the fact that the Project will implement an integrated lower residential component than the originally allowed under the OCSP, the POCA and the POOC, which would result in substantially reduced Daily and, AM and PM Peak Hour Trip generation rates compared to trip generation rates that would result from maximum allowable commercial intensities on the same acreage under the Certified EIR and the subsequently approved addendums. 354
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-17 Environmental Analysis
In accordance with the Project site plan and land use concepts, the proposed Project will realize a mixeduse development of approximately 71,200 SF of commercial and up to 694 multi-family units. Detailed trip generation calculations for the Project land uses are included in the Traffic Impact Analysis, provided as Appendix A to this Addendum, and the relevant trip generation information is summarized in Table 3-3, Comparison of Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation.

Table 3-3: Comparison of Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Trip Generation Comparison Daily A.M.

Peak Hour
P.M.

Peak Hour
Allowable trips per Ontario Center Specific Plan (OCSP) 1 98,837 1,961 7,556 Total Net Adept-Piemonte Trips 2 5,691 300 458
Trip Generation Difference Between OCSP and Adept-Piemonte 93,146 1,661 7,098 Percent of Trips Used by Adept-Piemonte Project 6.1% 18% 6.4% Source: Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum. 2006. Table 3-2, Comparison of Weekday Trip Generation. Page 3-16.

As presented in Table 3-3, above, total average daily trips generated by the Project is approximately 95 percent less than would otherwise result under buildout of the subject site per the maximum development intensities allowed under the OCSP and considered in the Certified EIR. Project related AM Peak Hour Trip generation is forecast to be only 18 percent of the allowable trips or 82 percent less than the maximum allowed under the OCSP. Similarly, the PM Peak Hour Trip generation forecast for the Project is 6.4 percent of the allowable trips or 93.6 percent less than the maximum development allowed under the OCSP.

The trip generation data summarized in Table 3-3 indicates that the Project would not exceed the total daily, nor peak-hour trip generation estimates resulting from maximum allowable development intensities considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. On this basis, the Project will not generate new or additional traffic or transportation impacts that were not previously identified in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary, nor is there a need for any additional mitigation measures.

3.5.5.1 CEQA VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ANALYSIS
In response to SB 743, the CNRA certified and adopted new CEQA Guidelines in December 2018 which now identify VMT as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's transportation impact under CEQA (Section 15064.3).

Effective July 1, 2020, the previous CEQA metric of LOS, typically measured in terms of automobile delay, roadway capacity and congestion, generally will no longer constitute a significant environmental impact.

The City of Ontario has adopted guidelines to provide recommendations and methodology and thresholds of significance for identifying VMT related impacts. The proposed Project is subject to a VMT analysis and will adhere to the recommendations and practices described in the City of Ontario Planning Commission Resolution No. PC20-021 (May 26, 2020).

Based on the analysis methodology described in the City of Ontario’s adopted Planning Commission Resolution regarding VMT, project screening procedures have been implemented to identify projects that may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary and 355
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-18 Environmental Analysis
will be exempted from further project-level VMT assessment. According to the City’s guidelines, land use projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) and that have the following characteristics are presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary:
• Has a Floor Area Ratio of 0.75 or higher;
• Includes no more parking for residents, customers, or employees than the City Development Code mandates;
• Is consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as determined by the City with input from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) or San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA); and
• If there are existing affordable residential units, replaces those residential units with at least as many similarly affordable units and not with a smaller number of moderate or high-income residential units.

Based on the Project site plan, the proposed Project encompasses the following Assessor Parcel Numbers shown in Table 3-4, Parcel Numbers.

Table 3-4: Parcel Numbers
Lot Assessor Parcel Number (APN)
A & B 021-020-501
C 021-020-438
D 021-020-438
F 021-020-412-15
G 021-020-420-25
Hence, the VMT analysis examined in this study focuses on the land use components from Lot A, Lot B, Lot C, and Lot D. After utilizing the SBCTA VMT Screening Tool, all Project parcels, with the exception of a portion of Parcel F of the proposed Project, are located within a TPA and therefore do not require a VMT analysis.

The portion of Parcel F which is not within the TPA is not planned to consist of any trip-generating land uses as those portions of the site will only be used to relocate some of the existing parking capacity on the Project site. Hence, those non-TPA areas are not subject to VMT analysis. Additionally, the proposed Project is expected to implement the following design features identified in the Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study, City of Ontario, California, June 4, 2021. The following Project design features are trip reduction measures to reduce the number of auto-based trips and encourage the use of transit, bicycling, and walking:
1 Improve the walkability and design of the Project by including pedestrian and bicycling connections within the Project site and to adjacent off-site facilities (i.e., sidewalks, crosswalks, footpaths, protected bike lanes, multi-purpose trails, direct parcel-to-parcel connections, wayfinding signage, etc.).
2 Provide traffic calming measures (i.e., marked crosswalks, raised crosswalks, raised intersections, count-own signal timers, curb extensions, speed tables, median islands, tight 356
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-19 Environmental Analysis
corner radii, roundabouts or mini-circles, on-street parking, planter strips with street trees, chicanes/chokers, etc.).
3 Provide bicycle racks for the retail and commercial uses and secure bicycle parking areas for the office and residential uses.

In addition, the PA VMT Per Population and PA VMT Per Worker is lower than the jurisdiction average VMT. Therefore, the proposed Project is found to have a less than significant VMT impact.

Biological Resources
The Certified EIR addressed potential biological resources impacts of the OCSP, including potential impacts to native plants and wildlife species. Due to the site’s previous uses (including operation of the Ontario Motor Speedway, along with agricultural and industrial uses) the site was found to be extremely disturbed. The Certified EIR notes that “Due to the lack of native vegetation and the disturbed nature of the site, no unique (listed or candidate) species of plants or animals were observed or are anticipated.” (EIR 88-2, Page III-65). No impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures were proposed.

The scope and character of the proposed Project development are consistent with the type and scope of development considered in the Certified EIR, and as such would not result in new, additional, or different impacts to biological resources than were considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary.

Air Quality
A Project specific Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. Findings are summarized herein, and the technical study is available as Appendix B of this Addendum.

The Certified EIR considered potential air quality impacts resulting from the OCSP. Temporary air quality impacts were anticipated to result from Project construction activities, which include preparation of the Project site, and construction of the proposed commercial, residential, and supporting facilities. During construction, air pollutants would be emitted by construction equipment. Dust (PM10 emissions) would also be generated by grading and site preparation activities.

The Certified EIR addresses construction-related air quality impacts as follows:
“Construction emissions will be short-term. Pollutants from construction-related activities are from final site development on 560 acres over an undefined time period.

The Ontario Center will ultimately be a mixed-use development on 700 acres. The generally referenced full buildout date is 2010. Presently, portions of the site are in varying stages of development including constructed buildings and roadways.

Additionally, the entire site has already been “rough” graded, meaning approximately 75 percent of construction-related activities have been conducted (i.e., excavations, the removal and transport of material and the construction of building pads). (The Ontario Center EIR, page III-13).”
357
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-20 Environmental Analysis
As noted in the discussion of traffic and circulation presented in Addendum Section 3.5.5, a reduction in traffic is projected to occur when comparing the proposed Project operations to maximum development intensities considered in the Certified EIR; thus, no increase in mobile air emissions is expected to occur.

Operational emissions resulting from the consumption of natural gas and electricity by new projectrelated land uses (area sources) were also estimated within the Certified EIR. As the proposed Project would realize an overall reduction in development intensity when compared to the maximum allowable intensities considered in the Certified EIR, area source emissions would be no greater than, and would likely be reduced when compared to emissions estimates presented in the Certified EIR. It is also noted that on a project-by-project basis, area source emissions are incrementally insignificant when compared to mobile source emissions, and typically account for less than one percent of a given project’s total operational emissions. Therefore, any potential increase in area source emissions resulting from the proposed Project would be more than offset by the projected reduction in mobile source emissions. It is further noted, that in providing an integrated mix of residential and commercial products, the proposed Project establishes and supports land use plans that act to reduce commute distances, with correlating reductions in vehicle source emissions. The Project specific Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study concluded the following regarding Mobile Source Emissions:

Mobile Source Emissions
Mobile source emissions are the largest source of long-term air pollutants from the operation of the Project. Mobile sources are direct sources of Project emissions that are primarily attributed to tailpipe exhaust and road dust (tire, brake, clutch, and road surface wear) from motor vehicles traveling to and from the site. Estimates of mobile source emissions require information on four parameters: trip generation, trip length, vehicle/fleet mix, and emission factors (quantity of emission for each mile traveled or time spent idling by each vehicle). The trip generation rates, trip length and trip percentages for the Project are based on the latest version of the Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development Traffic Impact Study Scoping Agreement, by RK, May 2021 and SBCTA VMT Tool7.7 The Emission Factors (EMFAC2017) 2017 model and off-model adjustments factors to account for the Statistical AreaFE Vehicle Rule is used to estimate the mobile source emissions that are embedded in the CalEEMod emissions model. No adjustments have been made to default emission factors. The Project’s total VMT estimated by CalEEMod is shown in the Table 3-5, Operational Vehicle Miles Traveled, for this project.

Table 3-5: Operational Vehicle Miles Traveled
Land Use Annual VMT
Multi-family Mid-Rise1
5,682,657
Commercial/Retail Center 4,539,098
Total 10,221,755
Source: RK Engineering. Air Quality and GHG Analysis. Table 10, Operational Vehicle Miles Traveled. 1 The VMT estimates for residential home-based trips are based on estimates from the SBCTA VMT Tool, which shows daily home-based VMT per capita for TAZ 53690101 of 7.9 VMT per population for model year 2023. 7 SBCTA VMT Screening Tool. https://devapps.fehrandpeers.com/sbctavmt/ 358
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-21 Environmental Analysis
The operational vehicle fleet mix has been adjusted to reflect vehicle types used for typical residential home-based trips and the commercial/retail and office trips generated by the Project. The SCAG regional travel demand model does not include heavy-duty trucks, buses or other large vehicles that would require passenger car equivalent (PCE) adjustments for residential home-based trips.

The proposed Project does not consist of land uses that would typically require PCE adjustments to account for large trucks, such as warehousing. To be conservative, the Air Quality/GHG analysis has assumed that two percent of the total residential home-based trips and commercial/retail and office trips will include trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 10,000 pound or greater. This includes LHD2, MHD, HHD, OBUS, UBUS, and SBUS vehicles. The 2% mix is also consistent with the default Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) assumptions. The adjusted vehicle mix is proportioned according to the default CalEEMod vehicle mix.

Air Quality Regional Significance Thresholds
The SCAQMD has established air quality emissions thresholds for criteria air pollutants for the purposes of determining whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment per Section 15002(g) of the Guidelines for implementing CEQA. By complying with the thresholds of significance, the Project would be in compliance with the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and the federal and state air quality standards. Table 3-6, SCAQMD Regional Significance Air Quality Thresholds, lists the air quality significance thresholds for the six air pollutants analyzed in this report. Lead is not included as part of this analysis as the Project is not expected to emit lead in any significant measurable quantity.

Table 3-6: SCAQMD Regional Significance Air Quality Thresholds Pollutant Construction (lbs/day) Operation (lbs/day)
NOx 100 55
VOC 75 55
PM10 150 150
PM2.5 55 55
SOx 150 150
CO 550 550
Source: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-qualitysignificancethresholds.pdf Short Term Air Quality Impacts – Construction
Daily Emissions - Construction
Daily air quality emissions include both on-site and off-site emissions associated with construction of the Project. Regional daily emissions of criteria pollutants are compared to the SCAQMD thresholds of significance.

As shown in Table 3-7, Daily Construction Emissions, daily emissions of criteria pollutants are expected to be below the allowable thresholds of significance. CalEEMod daily emissions outputs are provided in Appendix A of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Study, provided as Appendix B to this Addendum.
359
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-22 Environmental Analysis
Table 3-7: Daily Construction Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1,2
Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 MP10 PM2.5
Demolition 0.91 14.16 26.89 0.09 7.84 1.56
Site Preparation 0.55 2.08 21.68 0.04 7.78 3.98
Grading 0.85 3.36 33.90 0.06 3.85 1.56
Building Construction 4.86 17.12 60.88 0.16 11.46 3.28
Paving 1.29 1.25 17.86 0.02 0.21 0.08
Architectural Coating 70.26 0.56 8.39 0.02 1.96 0.53
Maximum1 70.26 17.12 60.88 0.16 11.46 3.98
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source: RK Engineering. Air Quality and GHG Analysis. Table 13, Daily Construction Emissions.

Notes:

DU: Dwelling Unit(s)
SF: Square Feet
The Project must follow mandatory SCAQMD rules and requirements with regards to fugitive dust control, as described in Section 6.1.3 of the SCAQMD rules. Compliance with the standard dust control measures is considered to be part of the conditions of approval for the Project and built into the design features.

Table 3-7, above, shows that, the Project’s daily construction emissions would be below the applicable SCAQMD air quality standards and thresholds of significance. As a result, the Project would not contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation.

Furthermore, by complying with the SCAQMD standards, the Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors). The Project’s short-term construction impact on regional air resources would be less than significant.

On the basis of the preceding discussions, the proposed Project does not create new, additional, or substantially different air quality impacts than were considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary.

Noise
A Project specific Noise Impact Study was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. Findings are summarized herein, and the technical study is available as Appendix C to this Addendum.

The Certified EIR considered potential noise impacts resulting from implementation and operations of the OCSP and identified two characteristic noise sources typically identified with land use intensification.

These include construction activities, especially heavy equipment, which will create short-term noise increases, and operational noise, including noise generated by traffic (mobile sources) and on-site facilities (area sources). In addition, sources of existing noise affecting the Project area are assessed, including vehicular noise from surrounding roadways.
360
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-23 Environmental Analysis

3.5.8.1 Potential Off-site Noise Impacts
Since the Certified EIR was adopted, numerous development projects have been approved and constructed in the Project vicinity, including residential uses, which are considered to be noise-sensitive receptors. Residential uses that may be affected by Project-related noise include the adjacent Fairfield/Sares-Regis residential project, and to lesser extent, residential uses located northerly of Fourth Street within the neighboring City of Rancho Cucamonga.

Potential Construction Noise and Vibration Impacts
Construction equipment, activities, and techniques required to construct the Project are consistent with the character and extent of construction methodologies considered in the Certified EIR. That is, the Project would not require, nor employ extraordinary construction techniques nor unusual construction equipment that would generate noise not previously considered in the Certified EIR. Nor would the Project result in construction beyond the physical limits of construction considered in the Certified EIR. As such, construction-related noise sources and noise levels would not be substantially greater, nor different than, those previously considered and addressed in the Certified EIR.

It is also important to note that noise-intensive construction activities are limited in duration to the construction period; and, except in unusual circumstances, noise-producing construction activities typically end by 4:00 p.m. The Project is also required to comply with construction time limitations established by the City Noise Ordinance, which limitations act to reduce the extent, intensity, and duration of construction noise during noise-sensitive morning and evening hours, as well as on weekends and holidays. On the basis of the preceding discussions, the proposed Project would not result in new, additional, or substantially different off-site construction-related noise impacts than were considered and addressed in the Certified EIR.

Construction and Vibration Impacts
Temporary construction noise and vibration impacts have been assessed from the Project site to the nearest sensitive residential use to the north of Lot F and Lot G. The degree of construction noise would vary depending on the type of construction activity taking place and the location of the activity relative to the surrounding properties. Chapter 29: Noise, Section 5-29.06 of the City’s municipal code states that the following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of the noise code. • Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition or grading of any real property. Such activities shall instead be subject to the following provisions of § 5-29.09; ▪ No person, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition or any other related building activity, shall operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner that produces loud noise that disturbs a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, or a Police or Code Enforcement Officer, on any weekday except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. or on Saturday or Sunday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
361
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-24 Environmental Analysis
▪ No landowner, construction company owner, contractor, subcontractor, or employer shall permit or allow any person or persons working under their direction and control to operate any tool, equipment, or machine in violation of the provisions of this section.

To help further assess potential construction noise level impacts under CEQA, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2006) criteria is used as a referenced threshold of significance in this report. The FTA provides reasonable criteria for assessing construction noise impacts based on the potential for adverse community reaction. For residential uses, the daytime noise threshold is 80 dBA Leq for an 8-hour period. In compliance with the City’s Municipal Code, it is assumed construction would not occur during the noise-sensitive nighttime hours.

Typical Construction Noise Levels
Table 3-8, Typical Construction Noise Levels, shows typical construction noise levels compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for common type construction equipment. Typical construction noise levels are used to estimate potential project construction noise levels at the adjacent sensitive receptors.

Table 3-8: Typical Construction Noise Levels
Type Noise Levels (dBA) at 50 Feet
Earth Moving
Compactors (Rollers) 73 – 76
Front Loaders 73 – 84
Backhoes 73 – 92
Tractors 75 - 95
Scrapers, Graders 78 – 92
Pavers 85 – 87
Trucks 81 – 94
Materials Handling
Concrete Mixers 72 – 87
Concrete Pumps 81 – 83
Cranes (Movable) 72 – 83
Cranes (Derrick) 85 – 87
Stationary
Pumps 68 - 71
Generators 71 – 83
Compressors 75 - 86
Impact Equipment
Pneumatic Wrenches 82 – 87
Jack Hammers, Rock Drills 80 – 99
Pile Drivers (Peak) 95 – 105
Other
Vibrators 62 – 82
Saws 71 - 82
Source: RK Engineering. Noise Analysis. Table 17, Typical Construction Noise Levels.

Referenced Noise Levels from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 362
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-25 Environmental Analysis
Construction Noise Impact Analysis
The assessment analyzed potential noise impacts during all expected phases of construction, including:
demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating.

Construction phasing and equipment usage assumptions are referenced from the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study provided as Appendix B to this Addendum.

The Project’s estimated construction noise levels have been calculated using the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) Roadway Construction Noise Model Version 1.1. Table 3-9, Project Construction Noise Levels – Residential Uses to the North, shows the noise level impacts to the nearest residential property lines to the north at 160 feet.

Table 3-9: Project Construction Noise Levels – Residential Uses to the North Phase Equipment Quantity
Equipment
Noise Level at 160 ft
(dBA Leq)
Combined Noise
Level (dBA Leq)
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saw 1 72.5
Excavator 3 66.6 76.3
Rubber Tired Dozer 2 67.6
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 67.6

77.5 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 69.9
Grading
Excavators 2 66.6

78.1 Graders 1 70.9
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 67.6
Scrappers 2 69.5
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 69.9
Building
Construction
Cranes 1 62.5

78.1 Forklifts 3 60.9
Generator Sets 1 67.5
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 69.9
Welders 1 59.9
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixer 2 64.7
Pavers 2 64.1 71.8
Paving Equipment 2 62.9
Architectural
Coating Air Compressor 1 63.6 63.6
Worst Case Construction Phase Noise Level – Leq (dBA) 78.1 FTA Construction Noise Criteria (Detailed Assessment: 8 Hour Leq) 80.0 Noise Level Exceeds FTA Criteria? No
Source: RK Engineering. Noise Analysis. Table 18, Project Construction Noise Levels – Residential Uses to the North.

As shown in Table 3-9, above, Project construction noise levels are expected to be below the recommended 8-hour construction noise threshold provided by the FTA for adverse community reaction at the adjacent residential uses.
363
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-26 Environmental Analysis
Construction Vibration
To determine the vibratory impacts during construction, reference construction equipment vibration levels were utilized and then extrapolated to the façade of the nearest adjacent structures. The nearest sensitive receptors are the commercial/retail structures located adjacent to the Project site. All structures surrounding the Project site are “new structures.” No historical or fragile buildings are known to be located within the vicinity of the site.

The construction of the proposed Project is not expected to require the use of substantial vibration inducing equipment or activities, such as pile drivers or blasting. The main sources of vibration impacts during construction of the Project would be the operation of equipment such as bulldozer activity during demolition, loading trucks during grading and excavation, and vibratory rollers during paving. The construction vibration assessment utilizes the referenced vibration levels and methodology set forth within the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, FTA, September 2018. Table 3-10, Typical Construction Vibration Levels, shows the referenced vibration levels.

Table 3-10: Typical Construction Vibration Levels
Equipment
Peak Particle Velocity (PPV)
(inches/seconds) at 25 feet
Approximate Vibration
Level (LV) at 25 feet
Piledriver (impact)

1.518 (upper range) 112

0.664 (typical) 104
Piledriver (sonic)

0.734 upper range 105

0.170 typical 93
Clam shovel drop 0.202 94
Hydromill 0.008 in soil 66
(slurry wall) 0.017 in rock 75
Vibratory roller 0.210 94
Hoe ram 0.089 87
Large bulldozer 0.089 87
Caisson drill 0.089 87
Loaded trucks 0.076 86
Jackhammer 0.035 79
Small bulldozer 0.003 58
Source: RK Engineering. Noise Analysis. Table 19, Typical Construction Vibration Levels. 1 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Federal Transit Administration, September 2018 Table 3-11, Construction Vibration Impact Analysis, shows the Project’s construction-related vibration analysis at the nearest structures to the Project construction area. Construction impacts are assessed from the closest area on the Project site to the nearest adjacent structure at approximately 50 feet. The worstcase vibratory impact from the site is estimated to be 0.098 PPV (in/sec) at the structures to the west. No damage potential is expected.
364
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-27 Environmental Analysis
Table 3-11: Construction Vibration Impact Analysis
Construction
Activity
Distance
Nearest
Structure (ft)
Duration
Calculated
Vibration Level -
PPV (in/sec)
Damage Potential
Level
Annoyance
Criteria Level
Large Bulldozer 50 Continuous/Frequent 0.042 No Impacts Distinctly Perceptible
Vibratory Roller 50 Continuous/Frequent 0.035 No Impacts Barely Perceptible Loaded Trucks 50 Continuous/Frequent 0.098
Extremely Fragile
Buildings, Ruins,
Ancient
Mountains
Distinctly
Perceptible
Caisson Drilling 50 Continuous/Frequent 0.042 No Impacts Distinctly Perceptible
Source: RK Engineering. Noise Analysis. Table 20, Construction Vibration Impact Analysis.

As shown in Table 3-11, above, Project related construction activity is not expected to cause any potential damage to the nearest structures. The annoyance potential of vibration from construction activities would range from “distinctly perceptible” to “barely perceptible.” Construction vibration calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix D of the Noise Study, provided as Appendix C of this Addendum.

Operational Noise
With regard to operational noise, land uses proposed by the Project are consistent with development envisioned under the OCSP, and overall development intensities resulting from the Project are less than the maximum allowable development intensities for Statistical Areas D and E, as assessed in the Certified EIR. As such, the traffic and attendant vehicular noise from both passenger vehicles and delivery operational noise can be expected to be similar, but not greater than that presented in the Certified EIR.

Stationary Source Noise Impacts
The Project is not expected to consist of significant sources of stationary noise. The main sources of potential stationary noise impacts from the Project would mainly include on-site circulation and parking lot noise, Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units and outdoor conversational noise.

The types of on-site noise from the Project are typically considered compatible with other adjacent commercial/mixed use and would not typically be categorized as loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise that disturbs the peace or quiet of any neighborhood, or that causes discomfort or annoyance to any person of normal sensitiveness. In particular, social activities and vehicular related noise are generally substantially less during the noise sensitive nighttime hours. Although, mechanical HVAC equipment does have the potential to operate 24-hours a day.

Rooftop mechanical HVAC equipment are expected to be located at the center of each building. The nearest noise sensitive residential receptors are located approximately 750 feet away to the west of the proposed Lot C HVAC units and the noise impacts from the operation of mechanical HVAC equipment is expected to not be significant at this distance. Therefore, a preliminary evaluation of noise impacts at the adjacent commercial uses has been provided.
365
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-28 Environmental Analysis
Parking lot noise would occur from vehicle engine idling and exhaust, doors slamming, tires screeching, people talking, and the occasional horn honking. Parking lot noise is expected to occur on Lot F and Lot G and is conservatively assessed from the first parking space to northern residential properties; approximately 160 feet away. The site plan shows commercial/retail uses would face Via Piemonte and would be mostly shielded from the line of sight from the adjacent receptor property lines. Therefore, the outdoor conversational noise from the commercial/retail uses would not substantially contribute noise impacts to adjacent properties and was not included as a part of this analysis. Refer to Table 3-12, Stationary Noise Impact Analysis.

Table 3-12: Stationary Noise Impact Analysis1
Receptor Stationary Noise Source Combined Exterior
Noise Level (Leq) dBA
Number2LU Location Source Location Distance3 Noise Level (Leq) dBA Daytime4 Nighttime4
1 R
North of Lot F
& G Parking Lot Lot F & G 160 34.8 34.8 34.8
2 R West of Lot C
HVAC Lot C 510 32.2

32.6 32.6
Parking Lot Lot F 735 21.9
City of Ontario Residential Exterior Standard Levels 65.0 50.0 Noise Level Exceed Standard (?) No No
3 C
South of Lot C
& D
HVAC Lot A 213 39.6

43.7 43.7
HVAC Lot C 243 38.5
HVAC Lot D 243 38.5
Parking Lot Lot F & G 530 24.7
4 C East of Lot D
HVAC Lot D 485 32.7

36.6 36.6
Parking Lot Lot G 170 34.3
5 C East of Lot A
HVAC Lot A 213 39.6

42.4 42.4
HVAC Lot B 525 39.1
6 C South of Lot B
HVAC Lot A 580 31.1

39.0 39.0
HVAC Lot B 250 38.2
City of Ontario Residential Exterior Standard Levels 65.0 60.0 Noise Level Exceed Standard (?) No No
Source: RK Engineering. Noise Analysis. Table 14, Stationary Noise Impact Analysis. 1 Stationary noise calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix C. 2 Refer Exhibit A for Receptor Location.
3 Distance from the receptor to the nearest noise source. 4 Daytime: (7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M.); Nighttime: (10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.

As shown in Table 3-12, above, operational noise levels generated by the proposed Project are not expected to exceed the City’s daytime standards and nighttime noise standards at the nearest receptor property line for both commercial and residential uses. Stationary noise calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix C of the Noise Impact Study provided as Appendix C of this Addendum.

Preliminary Interior Noise Analysis
Traffic noise along the adjacent roadways is expected to be the primary source of ambient noise impacting future residents at the Project site. Traffic noise is analyzed to determine the Project’s noise/land use compatibility setting and to determine future noise levels to habitable exterior and interior areas on the 366
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-29 Environmental Analysis
Project site. This section of the analysis does not necessarily apply to CEQA, as recent court rulings have indicated that CEQA is primarily concerned with the project’s impact of the environment, not the environment’s impact on a Project.

Future traffic noise along the roadways is obtained from The Ontario Plan Figure S-3a, Future Roadway Noise Contours and represents the noise levels at the Project site. Table 3-13 shows the estimated future traffic noise levels at the Project site and the noise/land use compatibly rating based on the City of Ontario General Plan Table LU-7 standards; refer to Table 3-13, Future Traffic Noise Levels. The Ontario Plan Noise Level Exposure and Land Use Compatibility Guidelines is provided in Appendix A of the Noise Analysis Study, provided as Appendix C of this Addendum.

Table 3-13: Future Traffic Noise Levels1
Receptor
Exterior Noise Level (Ldn)
(dBA CNEL)
Noise/Land Use Compatibility
Multifamily Residential 65-70 Normally Unacceptable
Retail 65-70 Normally Acceptable
1 Source: The City of Ontario General Plan Table LU-7
The Project may experience noise levels that fall within the normally unacceptable range (65-75 CNEL) for the residential part of the Project and clearly acceptable (65-70 CNEL) for the retail part of the Project.

Hence, upgraded building construction techniques are expected to be required to achieve interior noise level standards for the residential uses. Based on the existing noise levels (CNEL) nearest the Project site range from 60.6 CNEL to 62.5 CNEL. It should be noted that the existing noise levels were taken during typical weekday conditions and do not include noise levels during an event at the Toyota Arena event center, which may further increase noise levels (i.e., traffic) in the area. Therefore, in order to be conservative, the higher limit of the future traffic noise levels at the Project site (70 dBA CNEL) has been utilized to conduct preliminary interior noise analysis.

A preliminary interior noise analysis has been prepared for the sensitive receptor locations using a typical "windows open" and "windows closed" condition. A "windows open" condition assumes 12 dBA of noise attenuation from the exterior noise level. A "windows closed" condition" assumes 20 dBA of noise attenuation from the exterior noise level. Table 3-14, Preliminary Interior Noise Impact Analysis, indicates the interior noise levels for the residential uses on the Project site.

Table 3-14: Preliminary Interior Noise Impact Analysis
Receptor
Location
Exterior Noise
Level at
Building
Façade
Interior Noise
Standard
Required Building
Shell Noise
Reduction
Interior Noise Level with Standard
California Construction Windows
(STC > 25)
STC Rating for
Windows Facing
“Windows Subject Roadway
Open”1
“Windows
Closed”2
Multifamily
Residential
70 45.0 25 58 50 28
Source: RK Engineering. Noise Analysis. Table 16, Preliminary Interior Noise Impact Analysis. 1 A minimum of 12 dBA noise reduction is assumed with the "windows open" condition. 2 A minimum of 20 dBA noise reduction is assumed with the "windows closed" condition. 367
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-30 Environmental Analysis
The Project is expected to require a "windows closed" condition and upgraded STC rated windows to meet the City/State interior noise standard of 45 dBA. To accommodate a “windows closed” conditions, all units shall be equipped with adequate fresh air ventilation, per the requirements of the California Uniform Building Code (UBC). Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project proponent should demonstrate to the City building department that the proposed building shell and window assemblies would achieve exterior to interior noise reduction necessary to meet the State of California and City of Ontario requirements. Furthermore, the Project shall comply with California Title 24 insulation building requirements for multi-family dwelling units for common separating assemblies (e.g., floor/ceiling assemblies and demising walls).

Los Angeles Ontario International Airport (LAONT)
The Los Angeles Ontario International Airport (LAONT) is centrally located in the City of Ontario. The airport is a medium-hub, full-service airport. Traffic at the airport includes general aviation, commercial passenger aviation, and air cargo freight movement. LAONT is a member of the Los Angeles World Airport (LAWA) system. LAWA is currently developing a Master Land Use Plan for LAONT that will provide a framework for the airport’s development and use through the year 2030.

The LAONT is located approximately 1.25 miles to the southwest of the Project site. A noise/land use compatibility assessment has been performed based on the Project’s location to the LAONT Airport. The noise contour maps for the LAONT Airport are provided in Exhibit D of the Noise Impact Study, provided as Appendix C of this Addendum. The Project is located outside of the 60 dB Ldn noise contour limit; therefore, the exterior noise impact from the airport would be within the allowable limits for residential land uses and the Project is considered compatible with the surrounding land use and noise environment.

Noise from airport operations is expected to generate a less than significant on the proposed Project.

Design Features
The following recommended Project design features include standard rules and requirements, best practices and recognized design guidelines for reducing noise levels.

Design features are assumed to be part of the conditions of the proposed Project and integrated into its design. Design features are not typically considered mitigations under CEQA.

Operational Design Features
NOI-DF-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Project shall prepare a final acoustical study that demonstrates building construction will achieve the minimum interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL for all residential units located along arterial roadways and/or adjacent to industrial uses, per the California Building Standards Code. The following noise control measures may be required for dwelling units located near adjacent roadways and industrial uses:
▪ Install sound barriers between residences and noise sources. ▪ Install double-paned or similar sound rated windows.
▪ Provide sound insulating exterior walls and roofing systems. 368
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-31 Environmental Analysis
▪ Locate and/or design attic vents to minimize sound propagation into each home. ▪ Place dwelling as far as practical from the noise source.

NOI-DF-2 The Project shall comply with California Title 24 building insulation requirements for exterior walls, roofs and common separating assemblies (e.g., floor/ceiling assemblies and demising walls).

NOI-DF-3 For proper acoustical performance, all exterior windows, doors, and sliding glass doors should have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum.

NOI-DF-4 The final building plans shall ensure that HVAC units are not located within an area of the project site that would contribute to a noise level exceedance at any adjacent property line, per the City of Ontario Municipal Code requirements. To meet the City’s noise standards the following measures should be followed:
▪ All HVAC equipment shall be shielded or enclosed from the line of sight of adjacent residential uses.

Construction Design Features
NOI-DF-5 Prepare a construction management plan and obtain a construction work permit from the City of Ontario prior to starting construction. The construction management plan shall ensure all contractors implement construction best management practices to reduce construction noise levels. Best management practices shall include the following:
▪ All construction equipment shall be equipped with mufflers and other suitable noise attenuation devices (e.g., engine shields).
▪ Grading and construction contractors shall use quieter equipment as opposed to noisier equipment (such as rubber-tired equipment rather than track equipment), to the maximum extent feasible.
▪ If feasible, electric hook-ups shall be provided to avoid the use of generators. If electric service is determined to be infeasible for the site, only whisper-quiet generators shall be used (i.e., inverter generators capable of providing variable load). ▪ Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible.
▪ Locate staging area, generators and stationary construction equipment as far from the adjacent residential homes as feasible.
▪ Construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than five minutes. ▪ Provide notifications and signage in readily visible locations along the perimeter of construction sites that indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where neighbors can inquire about the construction process and register complaints to a designated construction noise disturbance coordinator.
369
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-32 Environmental Analysis
▪ Construction activities shall not take place between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and Saturday or Sunday between the hours of 6:00 p.m and 9:00 a.m.

NOI-DF-6 No impact pile driving or blasting activities shall be permitted on the Project site during construction. If impact pile driving or blasting is required, a follow-up noise and vibration impact assessment shall be conducted prior to start of any activity.

Aesthetics
The proposed Project reflects development and design standards envisioned under the OCSP. (Please refer to the SPA document for a comprehensive listing of proposed design standards.) Prior to issuance of building permits, the City would review Project facilities’ designs for consistency with the OCSP. On this basis, the Project would not result in new, additional, or different impacts than were considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary.

Seismicity
In terms of seismicity, the Certified EIR indicates that although active earthquake faults are known to exist within the general Project vicinity, no known faults traverse the site. The uses proposed by the Project would result in localized increased exposure of persons and structures to potential seismic hazards.

However, the risk at the Project site is considered no greater than that experienced throughout other areas of southern California.

Application of the latest applicable established uniform building code (UBC) seismic design, engineering, and construction standards would ensure that, short of a catastrophic event, Project structures and infrastructure systems would withstand anticipated seismic activity. As such, the Project would not result in new, additional, or different impacts than were considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary.

Hydrology
The Certified EIR indicates that extensive regional drainage improvements had been constructed since the original approval of the OCSP. These improvements included the Day Creek Channel, Deer Creek Channel, Turner Basins, and the Fourth Street Interceptor. The Certified EIR stated that, “with the exception of Day Creek, all downstream drainage systems have been upgraded to accept the predicted fully developed runoff from The Ontario Center. Day Creek improvements were funded and scheduled to be constructed in the near future, as of the approval of the Certified EIR, which would have updated the mainline systems below The Ontario Center.”
The Project developer was required to install new storm drainage facilities pursuant to adopted drainage plans if necessary, and, if modifying existing drainage facilities, must have ensured that no facility was removed without replacement by another functionally equivalent facility. Easements are required for drainage facilities placed outside of public streets. As required under adopted BMPs, temporary siltation basins and/or similar facilities would be implemented as a means of reducing siltation during construction activities.
370
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-33 Environmental Analysis
Application of the above-noted and similar measures as required by the City and RWQCB, would ensure that storm drainage flows do not adversely affect land uses on-site, or “downstream” properties or watercourses, either through potential flooding, erosion, or water quality impacts.

Additionally, the Certified EIR addressed groundwater recharge, stating, “The proposed development will not significantly change groundwater recharge conditions. Recharge is currently limited on the site due to runoff rates and soil conditions. Overland flows across the pervious sections of the site are not expected to infiltrate to a depth where an effect on groundwater storage is significant.” The Project does not propose elements or aspects that would materially affect these conclusions.

On the basis of the preceding discussions, the Project would not result in new, additional, or different hydrology impacts than were considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary.

Water Quality
The Certified EIR addresses the potential for impacts to regional groundwater resulting from urbanization of the OCSP site. As noted previously, adopted BMPs require provision of temporary structural measures, (such as velocity dissipators, siltation fences or basins, and vegetative buffer zones), along with periodic cleaning of storm drains and street sweeping, thereby reducing siltation and sedimentation runoff during construction. Further, the Project would implement all long-term and operational requirements of the RWQCB, including those that may have been developed subsequent to adoption of the OCSP and Certification of the EIR. On this basis, the proposed Project would not result in new, additional, or different impacts than were considered and addressed in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary.

Alternatives
The proposed Project is consistent with the development concepts and land uses for the Project site as presented within the Certified EIR and would result in overall reduced development intensities when compared to the maximum allowable development intensities considered in the Certified EIR.

On this basis, potential impacts of the proposed Project would constitute a “Reduced Intensity Alternative,” and would be considered within the scope and range of impacts that would result from the Alternatives considered in the Certified EIR. As such, implementation of the proposed Project would have no discernible effect on analyses or conclusions regarding development alternatives considered in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary.

Cumulative Impacts
As demonstrated in the preceding discussions, the proposed Project would result in comparable impacts, but in no case would exceed the scope or intensity of environmental impacts considered and addressed in the Certified EIR, the CECA, POCA, or POOC. Similarly, potential cumulative impacts of the Project would be comparable to, but no greater in scope or intensity than, cumulative impacts as presented in the Certified EIR. On this basis, the Project would have no discernible effect on analyses or conclusions 371
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 3-34 Environmental Analysis
regarding cumulative impacts considered in the Certified EIR. No changes or additions to the Certified EIR analysis are necessary.
372
Figure 8: Community Events Center Addendum (CECA) - 2006 Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario

EVENTS CENTER WAY

PIEMONTE

PRIVADO
373
Figure 9: Site Plan (Lots A and B)
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
PG. 10

LOT A & B

PROPOSED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1/32” = 1’-0”
N

EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN
(PROTECT & INTEGRATE)

PROPOSED PUBLIC PLAZA & LANDSCAPE

EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
(PROTECT & INTEGRATE)

PROPOSED BUILDING
Commercial Area** 23,660 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 35,772 SF Wrap Level ‐ 1st Residential Floor 21,553 SF
2nd Level 91,960 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 259,164 SF
TOTAL* 408,449 SF
Parking Area* 153,284 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 561,733 SF
Units
Studio 84 units
1‐bedroom 180 units
2‐bedroom 120 units
Total Unit Count 384 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 264 stalls
2‐bedroom 240 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 504 stalls
Parking Provided (without lifts) 447 stalls
Proposed Lifts 57 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 504 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 18,759 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 24,853 SF 2nd Level 37,849 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 109,686 SF
TOTAL* 172,388 SF
Parking Area* 47,526 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 219,914 SF
Units
1‐bedroom 30 units
2‐bedroom 63 units
3‐bedroom 19 units
Total Unit Count 112 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 30 stalls
2‐bedroom & 3‐bedroom 164 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 194 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 115 stalls
Proposed Lifts 79 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 194 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 6,336 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 10,223 SF 2nd Level 25,025 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 79,956 SF
TOTAL* 115,204 SF
Parking Area* 37,192 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 152,396 SF
Units
Studio 18 units
1‐bedroom 32 units
2‐bedroom 44 units
Total Unit Count 94 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 50 stalls
2‐bedroom 88 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 138 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 99 spaces
Proposed Lifts 39 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 138 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 6,332 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 11,134 SF 2nd Level 30,056 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 87,672 SF
TOTAL* 128,862 SF
Parking Area* 40,966 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 169,828 SF
Units
Studio 4 units
1‐bedroom 42 units
2‐bedroom 58 units
Total Unit Count 104 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 46 stalls
2‐bedroom 116 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 162 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 105 spaces
Proposed Lifts 57 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 162 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking LOT A
LOT B
LOT C
LOT D
Commercial Area** 23,660 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 35,772 SF Wrap Level ‐ 1st Residential Floor 21,553 SF
2nd Level 91,960 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 259,164 SF
TOTAL* 408,449 SF
Parking Area* 153,284 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 561,733 SF
Units
Studio 84 units
1‐bedroom 180 units
2‐bedroom 120 units
Total Unit Count 384 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 264 stalls
2‐bedroom 240 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 504 stalls
Parking Provided (without lifts) 447 stalls
Proposed Lifts 57 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 504 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 18,759 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 24,853 SF 2nd Level 37,849 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 109,686 SF
TOTAL* 172,388 SF
Parking Area* 47,526 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 219,914 SF
Units
1‐bedroom 30 units
2‐bedroom 63 units
3‐bedroom 19 units
Total Unit Count 112 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 30 stalls
2‐bedroom & 3‐bedroom 164 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 194 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 115 stalls
Proposed Lifts 79 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 194 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 6,336 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 10,223 SF 2nd Level 25,025 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 79,956 SF
TOTAL* 115,204 SF
Parking Area* 37,192 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 152,396 SF
Units
Studio 18 units
1‐bedroom 32 units
2‐bedroom 44 units
Total Unit Count 94 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 50 stalls
2‐bedroom 88 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 138 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 99 spaces
Proposed Lifts 39 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 138 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 6,332 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 11,134 SF 2nd Level 30,056 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 87,672 SF
TOTAL* 128,862 SF
Parking Area* 40,966 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 169,828 SF
Units
Studio 4 units
1‐bedroom 42 units
2‐bedroom 58 units
Total Unit Count 104 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 46 stalls
2‐bedroom 116 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 162 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 105 spaces
Proposed Lifts 57 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 162 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking LOT A
LOT B
LOT C
LOT D

EXISTING TOYOTA ARENA
188,636.2 sf
73,270.09 sf

EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN
(PROTECT & INTEGRATE)

PROPOSED PUBLIC PLAZA & LANDSCAPE

EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
(PROTECT & INTEGRATE)

PROPOSED BUILDING
LEGEND 374

PROPOSED PUBLIC PLAZA, SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE

PROPOSED NEW STREET IMPROVEMENT

PROPOSED BUILDING
Figure 10: Site Plan (Lots C and D)
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
PG. 23

LOT C & D

GROUND FLOOR
SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”
N

PROPOSED PUBLIC PLAZA, SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE

PROPOSED NEW STREET IMPROVEMENT

PROPOSED BUILDING
TOTAL* 172,388 SF
Parking Area* 47,526 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 219,914 SF
Units
1‐bedroom 30 units
2‐bedroom 63 units
3‐bedroom 19 units
Total Unit Count 112 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 30 stalls
2‐bedroom & 3‐bedroom 164 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 194 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 115 stalls
Proposed Lifts 79 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 194 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 6,336 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 10,223 SF 2nd Level 25,025 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 79,956 SF
TOTAL* 115,204 SF
Parking Area* 37,192 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 152,396 SF
Units
Studio 18 units
1‐bedroom 32 units
2‐bedroom 44 units
Total Unit Count 94 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 50 stalls
2‐bedroom 88 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 138 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 99 spaces
Proposed Lifts 39 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 138 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 6,332 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 11,134 SF 2nd Level 30,056 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 87,672 SF
TOTAL* 128,862 SF
Parking Area* 40,966 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 169,828 SF
Units
Studio 4 units
1‐bedroom 42 units
2‐bedroom 58 units
Total Unit Count 104 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 46 stalls
2‐bedroom 116 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 162 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 105 spaces
Proposed Lifts 57 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 162 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls LOT C
LOT D
172,388
Parking Area* 47,526 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 219,914 SF
Units
1‐bedroom 30 units
2‐bedroom 63 units
3‐bedroom 19 units
Total Unit Count 112 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 30 stalls
2‐bedroom & 3‐bedroom 164 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 194 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 115 stalls
Proposed Lifts 79 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 194 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 6,336 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 10,223 SF 2nd Level 25,025 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 79,956 SF
TOTAL* 115,204 SF
Parking Area* 37,192 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 152,396 SF
Units
Studio 18 units
1‐bedroom 32 units
2‐bedroom 44 units
Total Unit Count 94 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 50 stalls
2‐bedroom 88 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 138 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 99 spaces
Proposed Lifts 39 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 138 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls Commercial Area** 6,332 SF
Gross Area*
Ground (incl. commercial, lobby, utilities, stairs, etc) 11,134 SF 2nd Level 30,056 SF
3rd ‐ 5th Level 87,672 SF
TOTAL* 128,862 SF
Parking Area* 40,966 SF
TOTAL AREA* (with parking) 169,828 SF
Units
Studio 4 units
1‐bedroom 42 units
2‐bedroom 58 units
Total Unit Count 104 units
Parking Required
Studio & 1‐bedroom 46 stalls
2‐bedroom 116 stalls
TOTAL REQUIRED 162 stalls
Parking Count (without lifts) 105 spaces
Proposed Lifts 57 stalls
TOTAL PROVIDED 162 stalls
*Gross Area: everything to the outside of the exterior walls, excluding parking **Commercial Area: measured within the exterior/boundary walls LOT C
LOT D
52,000.62 sf
47,415.92 sf
LEGEND
375
Figure 11: Piemonte at Ontario Center Addendum (POCA) - 2006 Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
Ontario Mills
Shopping Center
Commercial Uses
Residential
Uses
Empire Lakes
Golf Course
Residential
Uses

PROJECT SITE
4th Street
onc sC our
Haven Aven
ue
i i v
n M ll ken A e ue
Office Uses
Commercial Uses
Industrial Uses Commercial
Uses
Commercial
Uses
Office &
Hotel Uses
376
Figure 12: Piemonte Overlay at Ontario Center (POOC) - 2017 Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
377
Figure 13: Elevations (Lots A and B)
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario

GARAGE GARAGE
63’-6” 105’-0”

CONCOUR ST

ONTARIO CENTER PKWY
63’-6”
SECTION 1-1
SCALE: 1/32” = 1’-0”
SECTION 2-2
SCALE: 1/32” = 1’-0”

LOT A LOT B

LOT B LOT A

CONCOUR ST
GARAGE

NEW DEVELOPED COURTYARD
LOT A

CONCOURS ST

ONTARIO CENTER PKWY
30’-0”

TO STREET
30’-0”

TO STREET
32’-0”

TO STREET
16’-0”
16’-0”
66’-0” 16’-0”
66’-0”
26’-0”
66’-0”
16’-0”
378
Figure 14: Elevations (Lots C and D)
Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project Addendum EIR
City of Ontario
SECTION 1-1
SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0”
ELEVATION CD-1 GARAGE
LOT C
GARAGE
LOT D

LOT D LOT C
GARAGE
ENTRY
GARAGE
ENTRY
25’-0” PARKING & SIDEWALK
75’-0”

VIA PIEMONTE

VIA PIEMONTE
25’-0”
77’-9”

PARKING & SIDEWALK PARKING & SIDEWALK

PARKING & SIDEWALK
379
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Determination

4.0 Determination
380
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 4-1 Determination

4.0 DETERMINATION
As supported by the analysis presented in this Addendum, the potential environmental effects of the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project at the Ontario Center Specific Plan, and associated required discretionary actions, have been adequately addressed in the Certified EIR for the OCSP (EIR 88-2, SCH No. 89041009).

Additionally, this Addendum to the Certified EIR provides minor changes to the Certified EIR analysis which reflect certain facilities configurations and development standards presented in the CECA, POCA, and POOC. As such, preparation of any further information and analysis (e.g., preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR) is not warranted.

Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA Section 15162 and 15164, the following determinations have been made:

Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the preceding analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the Certified EIR are required. Comparison of the previous project with the Project described in this Addendum indicates that there is no new significant or more severe environmental impact, and that the approval of the Project described herein would have the same or reduced impacts as those described in the Certified EIR prepared for the OCSP.

No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to the Certified EIR.

No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Identified in the EIR
This Addendum has considered all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information, that was not available at the time the OCSP EIR was certified, that may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the Certified EIR. As supported by the analysis presented in this Addendum, there is no substantial new information, that was not available at the time the OCSP was certified, indicating that there will be a new, significant impact requiring major revisions of the EIR.

No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects Identified in the EIR
The Addendum analysis substantiates that there are no significant impacts requiring identification of new or additional alternatives to the Project, or consideration of new or additional mitigation measures, in order to reduce one or more of the significant effects identified in the EIR. 381
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix A

APPENDIX A

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
382
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix B

APPENDIX B

AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS

IMPACT STUDY
383
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix C

APPENDIX C

NOISE IMPACT STUDY
384
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix D

APPENDIX D

ENERGY STUDY
385
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E

APPENDIX E

OTHER CEQA TOPICS/ENVIRONMENTAL

ANALYSIS CHECKLIST
386
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E

UPDATES TO THE CEQA GUIDELINES
The State of California adopted revisions to the CEQA Guidelines which became effective on January 1, 2019. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15007(d), the City of Ontario must comply with the new Guidelines 120 days after they become effective, which in this case is May 1, 2019. City staff have provided the following supplemental discussion of CEQA Guidelines Appendix G topics where appropriate.

Additionally, this section includes a discussion of the CEQA Environmental Checklist.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CHECKLIST
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?

2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as
defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
387
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.

Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
388
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?

6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation:
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficient:

7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?

8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
389
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of greenhouse
gases?

9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within the safety zone of the airport land use compatibility plan for ONT or Chino Airports, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?

10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any other water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or potential for discharge of storm water
pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or
equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance
(including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
390
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site or volume of storm water runoff to cause environmental harm or potential for
significant increase in erosion of the project site or
surrounding areas?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site or potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of storm water runoff to cause
environmental harm?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff during construction and/or post- construction activity? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality or potential for discharge of storm water to affect the beneficial uses of receiving water?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Expose people or structures to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?

11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, airport land use compatibility plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?

12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
391
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

13. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within the noise impact zones of the airport land use compatibility plan for ONT and Chino
Airports, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?

14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?

15. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
i. Fire protection?
ii. Police protection?
iii. Schools?
iv. Parks?
v. Other public facilities?
392
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

16. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment?

17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated
roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?

18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074?

19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? In making this
determination, the City shall consider whether the project is 393
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
subject to the water supply assessment requirements of
Water Code Section 10910, et seq. (SB 610), and the
requirements of Government Code Section 664737 (SB 221). e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?

20. WILDFIRE. Would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope, or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?

21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term
environmental goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
394
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E

EXPLANATION OF THRESHOLDS

1. AESTHETICS
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Discussion of Effects: The Policy Plan (General Plan) does not identify scenic vistas within the City.

However, the Policy Plan (Policy CD1-5) requires all major north-south streets to be designed and redeveloped to feature views of the San Gabriel Mountains located to the east. The Project site is located south of Fourth Street, north of Concours Street, between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue, and less than one-quarter mile north of Interstate 10 (I-10); refer to Figure 1. The Project site is not located in a major north-south arterial street as identified in the Functional Roadway Classification Plan (Figure M-2) of the Mobility Element within the General Plan.

Additionally, implementation of the proposed Project would result in development of commercial/retail and residential uses that are similar in scale, character, and intensity to those envisioned under the adopted OCSP and assessed in the Certified EIR. On this basis, the Project is not anticipated to result in different or greater aesthetic impacts than those identified in the Certified EIR. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated in relation to the Project.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, tress, rock outcroppings and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Discussion of Effects: The City of Ontario is served by three freeways: I-10, I-15, and SR-60. I-10 and SR-60 traverse the northern and central portion of the City, respectively, in an east–west direction. I-15 traverses the northeastern portion of the City in a north–south direction. These segments of I-10, I-15, and SR-60 have not been officially designated as scenic highways by the California Department of Transportation. In addition, there are no historic buildings, or any scenic resources identified on or in the vicinity of the Project site. Therefore, it would not result in adverse environmental impacts.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project would not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site or its surroundings. The Project site is located in an area that is characterized by a mix of commercial, entertainment retail, office, and high-density residential land uses, and is surrounded by commercial and office land uses.

The proposed Project would substantially improve the visual quality of the area through development of the site with a mix of commercial, entertainment retail, office, and high-density residential land uses, which would be consistent with the policies of the Community Design Element of the Policy Plan (General Plan) and zoning designations on the property, as well as with the commercial and office development in the surrounding area. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
395
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Discussion of Effects: New lighting would be introduced to the site with the development of the proposed Project. Pursuant to the requirements of the City’s Development Code, Project on-site lighting would be shielded, diffused or indirect, to avoid glare to pedestrians or motorists. In addition, lighting fixtures would be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the Project site and minimize light spillage.

Site lighting plans would be subject to review by the Planning Department and Police Department prior to issuance of building permits (pursuant to the City’s Building Security Ordinance). Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Discussion of Effects: The site is presently vacant and does not contain any agricultural uses. Further, the site is identified as “Other Land” and “Urban and Built-Up Land” on the map prepared by the California Resources Agency, pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. The “Other Land” consists of vacant and nonagricultural land that is greater than 40 acres in area and is surrounded on all sides by urban development. As a result, no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Discussion of Effects: The Project site is not zoned for agricultural use. The project site is zoned SP (Specific Plan) and is located within the Urban Commercial land use district and the Piemonte Overlay district of the OCSP, which is intended for development with a mix of commercial, entertainment retail, office, and high density residential land uses. The proposed Project is consistent with the development standards and allowed land uses of the proposed land use district. Furthermore, there is no Williamson Act contract in effect on the subject site. Therefore, no impacts to agricultural uses are anticipated, nor would there be any conflict with existing or Williamson Act contracts.

Mitigation: None required.
396
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project is intended for development with a mix of commercial, entertainment retail, office, and high-density residential land uses. The proposed Project is consistent with the Land Use Element (Figure LU-6) of the Policy Plan (General Plan) and the development standards and allowed land uses of the Urban Commercial land use district and the Piemonte Overlay district of the OCSP. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Discussion of Effects: There is currently no land in the City of Ontario that qualifies as forest land as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g). Neither The Ontario Plan nor the City’s Zoning Code provide designations for forest land. Consequently, the proposed Project would not result in the loss or conversion of forest land.

Mitigation: None required.
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project site is not designated as Farmland is currently zoned Specific Plan, and is located within the Urban Commercial land use district and the Piemonte Overlay district of the OCSP, which is intended for development with a mix of commercial, entertainment retail, office, and high-density residential land uses. The proposed Project site is currently partly vacant, but previously graded, on the northern portion of the site and fully developed with parking areas currently utilized for the Toyota Arena. There are no agricultural uses occurring onsite. As a result, to the extent that the Project would result in changes to the existing environment those changes would not result in loss of Farmland to non-agricultural use.

Additionally, there is currently no land in the City of Ontario that qualifies as forest land as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g). Neither The Ontario Plan nor the City’s Zoning Code provide designations for forest land. Consequently, to the extent that the proposed Project would result in changes to the existing environment, those changes would not impact forest land.

Mitigation Required: None required.

3. AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Discussion of Effects: The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of any air quality plan. As noted in The Ontario Plan FEIR (Section 5.3), pollutant levels in the Ontario area already exceed Federal and State standards. To reduce pollutant levels, the City of Ontario is actively participating in 397
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
efforts to enhance air quality by implementing Control Measures in the Air Quality Management Plan for local jurisdictions within the South Coast Air Basin.

The proposed Project is consistent with The Ontario Plan, for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Furthermore, the Project is consistent with the City's participation in the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP).

Additionally, implementation of the Project would result in the construction of commercial/retail and residential uses in a much lower scope and character to those assessed in the Certified EIR. As such, construction-related air pollutant emissions would be lower to than those considered in the Certified EIR.

Further, shown in Table 3-7, the proposed Project would not exceed any construction emission thresholds.

Additionally, as discussed in the Addendum, a reduction in total average daily traffic generation is anticipated under the Project. As a result, reductions in vehicle pollutant emissions are anticipated. Based on the preceding discussion, the proposed Project would not result in different or greater air quality impacts than those identified in the Certified EIR. Please refer also to Addendum Section 3.5.3, “Air Quality.” A less than significant impact would occur.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?
Discussion of Effects: Short term air quality impacts will result from construction related activities associated with construction activity, such as excavation and grading, machinery and equipment emissions, vehicle emissions from construction employees, etc. The daily emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulates from resulting grading and vehicular emissions may exceed threshold levels of the South SCAQMD.

The Project must follow mandatory SCAQMD rules and requirements with regards to fugitive dust control, as described in Section 6.1.3 of the SCAQMD rules. Compliance with the standard dust control measures is considered to be part of the conditions of approval for the Project and built into the design features.

Table 3-7, shows that, the Project’s daily construction emissions would be below the applicable SCAQMD air quality standards and thresholds of significance. As a result, the Project would not contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. As noted in Table 1-1, the Certified EIR include a set of mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Project.

Mitigation: Air Quality
MM-AQ-1 Regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust control measures defined in SCAQMD Rule 403 will occur during construction.

MM-AQ-2 Construction equipment will be maintained in proper tune to minimize the volume of equipment exhaust emissions.

MM-AQ-3 Comprehensive ridesharing incentive program will be developed as part of a Transportation System Management.

MM-AQ-4 Orientation of Project for transit convenience and accessibility will occur in design phase; provision of easy pedestrian access will occur in design phase; provision of bus shelters, benches and bus pockets on streets.

MM-AQ-5 Provision of traffic flow improvements will occur as buildout of project occurs. 398
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
MM-AQ-6 Inclusion of solar and other energy-saving devices in residences and businesses including:
• delamping
• increased building insulation
• heating/ventilation/air conditioning improvements
• solar heaters
• utilization of landscape features to shade buildings
MM-AQ-7 Construction activities should avoid high ozone days and discontinue construction during second stage alerts. After grading, seed and water until vegetation cover is established.

MM-AQ-8 Wet area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pickup by the wind.

MM-AQ-9 Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust from being raised beyond site operations. Wet construction areas down in the late morning and after work is completed in the day.

MM-AQ-10 Use low sulfur fuel for construction equipment (0.5 percent by weight).

As noted in the Certified EIR, a less than significant impact will occur with implementation of the applicable mitigation measures.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
Discussion of Effects: The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality because of the limited size and scope of the project. Although no impacts are anticipated, the Project would still comply with the air quality standards of the TOP FEIR and the SCAQMD resulting in impacts that are less than significant [please refer also to Addendum Section 3.5.3, “Air Quality.”] A less than significant impact would occur.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Discussion of Effects: Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within one-quarter mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401.

Given the close proximity of the project to nearest sensitive receptors (residential homes to the north), several measures are provided to help ensure the potential health risk associated with Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) during construction is reduced to the maximum extent feasible. This includes a requirement for Tier 4 engines on all diesel-powered construction equipment. Tier 4 engines, along with the latest 399
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
national fuel standards, have been shown to yield PM reductions of over 95 percent from the typical Tier 2 and Tier 3 engines8.

It is presumed that with the recommended design features and Tier 4 engines in place that the potential short term construction health risks would be adequately reduced to be less than significant. Design features DF-3 through DF-9 are recommended to help ensure the Project does not expose receptors to substantial pollution concentrations during construction. However, these are not considered mitigation measures. A less than significant impact would occur.

Mitigation: None required.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Discussion of Effects: The uses proposed on the subject site, as well as those permitted within the Urban Commercial land use district and the OCSP, do not create objectionable odors. Further, the Project shall comply with the policies of the Ontario Municipal Code and the General Plan. Additionally, as noted in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis, the Project’s operations would result in less than significant odor impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service?
Discussion of Effects: The site is located within an area that has historically been found to contain Delhi Soils, which is potential habitat for the Delhi Sand Flower-loving Fly (DSF), a federally listed endangered species. However, as a result of previous development, grading, and land uses on the Project site, including construction and operation of the Ontario Motor Speedway (razed in 1981), and more recently, construction activity associated with the phased development of approximately 1.3 million square feet of retail, office, hotel, and entertainment uses, and 800 multiple-family dwelling units, including mass grading of the entire Project area, the installation of public utilities, and the construction of street improvements, have left the Project site in an extremely disturbed state. This determination is supported by previous environmental reports addressing the Project site, including Ontario International Centre EIR 80-3 (SCH No. 80062538), Certified EIR 88-2 (SCH No. 89041009), and the POCA, all of which have found the Project site to be in an extremely disturbed state, with no native soils or native vegetation on the site.

The Project site has not been designated as a planned recovery zone for the DSF, and in its current condition, does not provide suitable habitat. No impact would occur.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 8 EPA. Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel; Final Rule. (40 CFR Parts 9, 69, et al.) 400
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Discussion of Effects: The Project site does not contain any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified by the California Department of Fish & Wildlife, or U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.

Therefore, no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Discussion of Effects: No wetland habitat is present on site. Therefore, Project implementation would have no impact on these resources.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Discussion of Effects: The Project site is a mixed vacant and fully developed property that is bounded on all four sides by development. As a result, there are no wildlife corridors connecting this site to other areas. Therefore, no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Discussion of Effects: The City of Ontario does not have any ordinances protecting biological resources.

Further, the site does not contain any mature trees necessitating the need for preservation. As a result, no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Discussion of Effects: The site is not part of an adopted HCP, NCCP or other approved habitat conservation plan. As a result, no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

5. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
Discussion of Effects: The Project site does not contain any buildings, structures, or objects. Additionally, as part of the Project site development during the OCSP, CECA, POCA, POOSCP, the Project site has been previously disturbed and fully graded. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 401
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Mitigation: None required.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
Discussion of Effects: The Ontario Plan FEIR (Section 5.5) indicates no archeological sites or resources have been recorded in the City with the Archeological Information Center at San Bernardino. As noted above, because the site has been previously fully disturbed and graded and no historical structures existing on-site, no adverse change in significance or an archaeological resource is anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Discussion of Effects: As described in the Certified EIR, cultural resources were not anticipated to be affected by the OCSP. As previously noted, the Project site has been previously graded. As such, the proposed Project would not affect areas or resources not previously considered in the Certified EIR. No additional or different impacts have been identified based on the Project Mitigation: None required.
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project is in an area that has been previously disturbed by development. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the Project area. Thus, human remains are not expected to be encountered during any construction activities. However, in the unlikely event that human remains are discovered, existing regulations, including the California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, would afford protection for human remains discovered during development activities.

Furthermore, standard conditions have been imposed on the Project that in the event of unanticipated discoveries of human remains are identified during excavation, construction activities, the area shall not be disturbed until any required investigation is completed by the County Coroner and/or Native American consultation has been completed, if deemed applicable.

Mitigation: None required.

6. Energy
Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation:

A Project specific Energy Study was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. Findings are summarized herein, and the technical study is available as Appendix D of this Addendum.

Discussion of Effects: As described in the Certified EIR, the Project’s impact is considered less than significant with the inclusion of the mandatory requirements of California’s Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and Green Building Standards (CALGreen, Title 24, Part 11). California’s building energy efficiency standards are some of the strictest in the nation and the Project’s compliance with California’s building code would ensure that wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy 402
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
is minimized. The building standards code is designed to reduce the amount of energy needed to heat or cool a building and reduce energy usage for lighting and appliances.

The proposed Project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact on energy. The following recommended energy design features (DF) are provided to further reduce wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary consumption of energy. Design features are consistent with the recommended design features provided with Air/GHG study. These DF are not considered mitigation measures.

Construction Energy Design Features
E-DF-1 Establish an electricity supply to the construction site and use electric powered equipment instead of diesel-powered equipment or generators, where feasible.

Operational Design Features
E-DF-2 Implement the GHG Reduction Measures from the Ontario County Climate Action Plan (CAP) Screening Tables to achieve at least 100 points, per the requirements for Mixed Use Projects.

E-DF-3 Comply with the mandatory requirements of California Building Standards Code Title 24 Part 6 (Energy Code) and Title 24 Part 11 (CAL Green).

E-DF-4 Implement water conservation strategies, including low flow fixtures and toilets, water efficient irrigation systems, drought tolerant/native landscaping, and limit the amount of turf/sod, per CAL Green and City of Ontario requirements.

E-DF-5 Implement zero waste strategies, recycling and composting programs for residential and nonresidential uses.

E-DF-6 Encourage residents and landscape maintenance crews to use electric landscaping equipment, such as lawnmowers and leaf blowers, wherever feasible.

E-DF-7 No natural gas or wood burning fireplaces shall be installed in any residential dwelling.

E-DF-8 Implement trip reduction measures that reduce the number of auto-based trips and encourage the use of transit, bicycling, and walking. Such as;

1. Improve the walkability and design of the project by including pedestrian and bicycling connections within the project site and to adjacent off-site facilities (i.e., sidewalks, crosswalks, foot paths, protected bike lanes, multi-purpose trails, direct parcel-to-parcel connections, wayfinding signage, etc.).

2. Provide traffic calming measures (i.e., marked crosswalks, raised crosswalks, raised intersections, count-down signal timers, curb extensions, speed tables, median islands, tight corner radii, roundabouts or mini-circles, on-street parking, planter strips with street trees, chicanes/chokers, etc.)

3. Provide bicycle racks for the retail and commercial uses and secure bicycle parking areas for the office and residential uses.

E-DF-9 Provide electric vehicle charging stations per the requirements of CALGreen.

A less than significant impact would occur.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficient:
403
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project’s impact is considered less than significant as the Project would purchase electricity through Southern California Edison which is subject to the requirements of California Senate Bill 100 (SB 100). SB 100 is the most stringent and current energy legislation in California; requiring that renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources supply 100 percent of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers and 100 percent of electricity procured to serve all state agencies by December 31, 2045.1 The Project would further comply with the mandatory requirements of California’s Green Building and Building Energy Efficiency standards that promote renewable energy and energy efficiency. A less than significant impact would occur.

Mitigation: None required.

7. GEOLOGY & SOILS
Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.

Discussion of Effects: There are no active faults known on the site and the Project site is located outside the Fault Rapture Hazard Zone (formerly Alquist-Priolo Zone). The Ontario Plan FEIR (Section 5.7/ Figure 5.7-2) identifies eight active or potentially active fault zones near the City. Given that the closest fault zone is located more than ten miles from the Project site, fault rupture within the Project area is not likely. All development would comply with the UBC seismic design standards to reduce geologic hazard susceptibility. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Discussion of Effects: There are no active faults known on the site and the Project site is located outside the Fault Rapture Hazard Zone (formerly Alquist-Priolo Zone). The Land Use Plan (Figure LU-6) of the Policy Plan (General Plan) FEIR (Section 5.7/Figure 5.7-2) identifies eight active or potentially active fault zones near the City. The closest fault zone is located more than ten miles from the Project site. The proximity of the site to the active faults would result in ground shaking during moderate to severe seismic events. All construction would be in compliance with the California Building Code (CBC), the Ontario Municipal Code, The Ontario Plan and all other ordinances adopted by the City related to construction and safety. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Discussion of Effects: As identified in the TOP FEIR (Section 5.7), groundwater saturation of sediments is required for earthquake induced liquefaction. In general, groundwater depths shallower than 10 feet to the surface can cause the highest liquefaction susceptibility. According to the POOC MND, depth to ground water at the Project site during the winter months is estimated to be between 250 to 450 feet below ground surface. Therefore, the liquefaction potential within the Project area is minimal. 404
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Implementation of The Ontario Plan strategies, UBC and Ontario Municipal Code would reduce impacts to a less than significant level.

Mitigation: None required.
iv) Landslides?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project would not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides because the relatively flat topography of the Project site (less than two percent slope across the City) makes the chance of landslides remote. Implementation of The Ontario Plan strategies, UBC and OMC would reduce impacts to a less than significant level.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project would not result in significant soil erosion or loss of topsoil because of the previously disturbed and developed nature of the Project site and the limited size and scope of the Project. Grading increases the potential for erosion by removing protective vegetation, changing natural drainage patterns, and constructing slopes. However, compliance with the CBC and review of grading plans by the City Engineer would ensure no significant impacts would occur. In addition, the City requires an erosion/dust control plan for projects located within this area. Implementation of a NPDES program, the Environmental Resource Element of the General Plan strategies, UBC, and OMC would reduce impacts to a less than significant level.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Discussion of Effects: The Project site would not result in the location of development on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable because as previously discussed, the potential for liquefaction and landslides associated with the Project site is less than significant. The Ontario Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The Project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. Further, implementation of The Ontario Plan strategies, UBC and OMC would reduce impacts to a less than significant level.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Discussion of Effects: The majority of Ontario, including the Project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits.

These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
405
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Discussion of Effects: The area is served by the local sewer system and the use of alternative systems is not necessary. There would be no impact to the sewage system.

Mitigation: None required.

8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Discussion of Effects: The impact of buildout of The Ontario Plan on the environment due to the emission of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) was analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for the Policy Plan (General Plan). According to the EIR, this impact would be significant and unavoidable. (Recirculated Portions of the Ontario Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, p. 2-118). This EIR was certified by the City on January 27, 2010, at which time a statement of overriding considerations was also adopted for The Ontario Plan’s significant and unavoidable impacts, including that concerning the emission of GHGs.

Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.3, this impact need not be analyzed further, because (1) the proposed project would result in an impact that was previously analyzed in The Ontario Plan EIR, which was certified by the City; (2) the proposed project would not result in any greenhouse gas impacts that were not addressed in The Ontario Plan EIR; (3) the proposed project is consistent with The Ontario Plan.

A Project-specific Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study was prepared. The results are provided herein, and the technical study is included as Appendix B of this Addendum. For purposes of this Project, the City of Ontario, Ontario County Climate Action Plan (CCAP) establishes the requirements for determining whether a project would have a significant impact to GHG emissions under CEQA.

The CCAP uses Screening Tables, which are setup similar to a checklist, with points allocated to certain elements of the Project to reduce GHG emissions. If a project garners 100 points (by including enough GHG reducing elements), then the project is consistent with CCAP and the impact may be considered less than significant for purposes of CEQA.

The proposed Project is expected to comply with the CCAP by implementing the Screening Table requirements into the Project design. To help ensure the Project adheres to the CCAP requirements, the following GHG Project DFs GHG-DF-10 through GHG-DF-17 are provided:

Design Features
GHG-DF-10 Implement the GHG Reduction Measures from the CCAP Screening Tables to achieve at least 100 points, per the requirements for Mixed Use Projects.

As described in Appendix B of the CCAP, for mixed use projects, both the residential and non-residential screening tables shall be completed. Mixed use Projects that garner at least 100 points will be consistent with the reduction quantities in the City’s CAP and are considered less than significant for GHG emissions.

Therefore, with the implementation of the CCAP Screening Tables, the Project is not expected to generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that would cause a significant impact on the environment. 406
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Also, by complying with the CCAP, the Project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases and the impact is considered less than significant.

Furthermore, since the purpose of the City’s CCAP is to ensure compliance with the state’s climate initiatives for reducing GHG emissions, by complying with the CCAP, the Project will also be in compliant with the broader statewide goals for combating climate change; such as those required in the CARB Scoping Plan and AB 32.

The mixed-use Project is also located within close proximity to high quality transit, located in a low VMT zone, and offers high-density residential development near commercial uses. The Project will include pedestrian friendly and walkable design that will encourage fewer auto-based trips. The following Project design features will be provided to further help reduce GHG emissions:

GHG-DF-11 Comply with the mandatory requirements of California Building Standards Code Title 24 Part 6 (Energy Code) and Title 24 Part 11 (CAL Green).

GHG-DF-12 Implement water conservation strategies, including low flow fixtures and toilets, water efficient irrigation systems, drought tolerant/native landscaping, and limit the amount of turf/sod, per CAL Green and City of Ontario requirements.

GHG-DF-13 Implement zero waste strategies, recycling and composting programs for residential and non-residential uses.

GHG-DF-14 Encourage residents and landscape maintenance crews to use electric landscaping equipment, such as lawn mowers and leaf blowers, wherever feasible.

GHG-DF-15 No natural gas or wood burning fireplaces shall be installed in any residential dwelling.

GHG-DF-16 Implement trip reduction measures that reduce the number of auto-based trips and encourage the use of transit, bicycling, and walking. Such as;

3. Provide bicycle racks for the retail and commercial uses and secure bicycle parking areas for the office and residential uses.

GHG-DF-17 Provide electric vehicle charging stations per the requirements of CALGreen.

The Project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. Additionally, with implementation of the Project DF, the Project would continue to have a less than significant impact on GHG. 407
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E

9. HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials?
Discussion of Effects: The Project is not anticipated to involve the transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials during either construction or Project implementation. Typical construction activities involve the use and handling of solvents, paints, and other chemicals. However, none of the proposed uses involve the use or handling of dangerous chemicals that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Additionally, the Project site have been previously graded, and no hazardous materials exist onsite. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. However, in the unlikely event of an accident, implementation of the strategies included in The Ontario Plan would decrease the potential for health and safety risks from hazardous materials to a less than significant impact.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. In addition, there are no known stationary commercial or industrial land uses within close proximity to the subject site, which use/store hazardous materials to the extent that they would pose a significant hazard to visitors/occupants to the subject site, in the event of an upset condition resulting in the release of a hazardous material. No impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project does not include the use, emissions or handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project site is not listed on the hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Therefore, the Project would not create a hazard to the public or the environment and no impact is anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
e) For a project located within the safety zone of the airport land use compatibility plan for ONT or Chino Airports, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
408
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Discussion of Effects: According to Land Use Element (Exhibit LU-06 Airport Environs) of the General Plan, the Project site is located within the airport land use plan. However, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people working or residing in the Project area because it would not obstruct aircraft maneuvering because of the Project's low elevation and the architectural style of the Project. Additionally, the Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Noise Impacts (Table LU-08) shows the proposed use as normally accepted in the 65 CNEL. The proposed use would comply with standards for mitigating noise.

Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Discussion of Effects: The Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Discussion of Effects: The City's Safety Element, as contained within The Ontario Plan, includes policies and procedures to be administered in the event of a disaster. The Ontario Plan seeks interdepartmental and inter-jurisdictional coordination and collaboration to be prepared for, respond to, and recover from everyday and disaster emergencies. In addition, the Project would comply with the requirements of the Ontario Fire Department and all City requirements for fire and other emergency access. Because the Project is required to comply with all applicable City codes, any impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level.

Mitigation: None required.
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Discussion of Effects: The Project site is not located in or near wildlands. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

10. HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
a) Violate any other water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or potential for discharge of storm water pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas?
Discussion of Effects: The Project site is served by City water and sewer service and would not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Discharge of storm water pollutants from areas of 409
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing, waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work) areas could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids, trash and debris, oil and grease, organic compounds, pesticides, nutrients, heavy metals and bacteria pathogens in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is required to comply with the statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Industrial Activities Stormwater Permit, the San Bernardino County Area-Wide Urban Runoff Permit (MS4 permit) and the City of Ontario’s Municipal Code (Title 6, Chapter 6 (Stormwater Drainage System)). In addition to the NPDES, MS4, and other permits listed in this section, this site is required to comply with the latest trash capture requirements from the State and RWQCB. This would reduce any impacts to below a level of significance. However, as part of the Certified EIR, the following Mitigation Measures (MMs) were imposed as part of the development of the OCSP:

Mitigation: Hydrology
MM-HYD-1 On-site drainage plans will be designed, submitted to, and approved by the City of Ontario prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

MM-HYD-2 Proposed storm drainage facilities to be installed as The Ontario Center develops, will be placed in public streets. W here storm drains must be placed in areas other than public streets, a drainage easement will be dedicated as needed.

MM-HYD-3 Some modification will be necessary to existing drainage facilities. No existing facility will be removed without replacement by another structure to serve the particular condition.

MM-HYD-4 As development proceeds, there will be a need for temporary siltation basins to reduce sedimentation from construction activities. These will be located in specific areas of construction and sized in accordance with City of Ontario criteria.

With implementation of the applicable Certified EIR MMs, the Project would have a less than significant impact.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
Discussion of Effects: No increases in the current amount of water flow to the Project site are anticipated, and the proposed Project would not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge. The water use associated with the proposed use of the property would be negligible. The development of the site would require the grading of the site and excavation is expected to be less than three feet and would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 230 to 250 feet below the ground surface. No adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site or volume of storm water runoff to cause environmental 410
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
harm or potential for significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas?
Discussion of Effects: It is not anticipated that the Project would alter the drainage pattern of the site or area, in a manner that would result in erosion, siltation or flooding on-or-off site nor would the proposed Project increase the erosion of the subject site or surrounding areas. The existing drainage pattern of the Project site would not be altered, and it would have no significant impact on downstream hydrology.

Stormwater generated by the Project would be discharged in compliance with the statewide NPDES General Construction Activities Stormwater Permit and San Bernardino County MS4 permit requirements.

With the full implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) developed in compliance with the General Construction Activities Permit requirements, the BMPs included in the SWPPP, and a stormwater monitoring program would reduce any impacts to below a level of significance.

No streams or streambeds are present on the site. No changes in erosion off-site are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site or potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of storm water runoff to cause environmental harm?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project is not anticipated to increase the flow velocity or volume of storm water runoff to cause environmental harm from the site and would not create a burden on existing infrastructure. Furthermore, with the implementation of an approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) developed for the site, in compliance with the San Bernardino County MS4 Permit requirements, stormwater runoff volume shall be reduced to below a level of significance.

Mitigation: None required.
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff (a&b) during construction and/or post-construction activity? Discussion of Effects: It is not anticipated that the Project would create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or create or contribute stormwater runoff pollutants during construction and/or post-construction activity. Pursuant to the requirements of The Ontario Plan, the City’s Development Code, and the San Bernardino County MS4 Permit’s WQMP, individual developments must provide site drainage and WQMP plans according to guidelines established by the City’s Engineering Department. If master drainage facilities are not in place at the time of Project development, then standard engineering practices for controlling post-development runoff may be required, which could include the construction of on-site storm water detention and/or retention/infiltration facilities. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality or potential for discharge of storm water to affect the beneficial uses of receiving water?
411
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Discussion of Effects: Activities associated with the construction period, could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is required to comply with the statewide NPDES General Construction Permit and the City of Ontario’s Municipal Code (Title 6, Chapter 6 (Stormwater Drainage System)) to minimize water pollution. Thus, it is anticipated that there is no potential for discharges of stormwater during construction that would affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters.

However, with the General Construction Permit requirement and implementation of the policies in The Ontario Plan, any impacts associated with the Project would be less than significant. However, as part of the Certified EIR, the following MMs were imposed as part of the development of the OCSP:

Mitigation: Water Quality
MM-WQ-1 During construction, a variety of temporary structural measures such as velocity dissipators, siltation fences or basins and. vegetative buffer zones will be used to reduce siltation and sedimentation runoff from construction sites.

MM-WQ-2 Periodic cleaning of storm drains and inlets, construction of pervious pavement surfaces in areas designated by the City, periodic street sweeping.

MM-WQ-3 Periodic street sweeping will be conducted by the City of Ontario for streets dedicated to the City. Periodic vacuum sweeping will be conducted by the owners of individual sites. g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Discussion of Effects: The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map.

Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area, structures that would impede or redirect flood flows?
Discussion of Effects: As identified in the Safety Element (Exhibit S-2) of the Policy Plan (General Plan), the site lies outside of the 100-year flood hazard area. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Discussion of Effects: As identified in the Safety Element (Exhibit S-2) of The Ontario Plan, the site lies outside of the 100-year flood hazard area. No levees or dams are located near the Project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
j) Expose people or structures to inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? 412
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Discussion of Effects: There are no lakes or substantial reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche are not anticipated. The City of Ontario has relatively flat topography, less than two percent across the City, and the chance of mudflow is remote. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

11. LAND USE & PLANNING
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
Discussion of Effects: The Project site is located in an area that is currently developed with urban land uses. This Project would be of similar design and size to surrounding development. The Project would become a part of the larger commercial, entertainment retail, office, and high-density residential communities, which surround the Project site. No adverse impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of agencies with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to general plan, airport land use compatibility plan, specific plan, or development code) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project is consistent with The Ontario Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?
Discussion of Effects: There are no adopted habitat conservation plans in the Project area. As such no conflicts or impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

12. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
Discussion of Effects: The Project site is located within a mostly developed area surrounded by urban land uses. There are no known mineral resources in the area. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Discussion of Effects: There are no known mineral resources in the area. No impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
413
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E

13. NOISE
Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Discussion of Effects: As noted in Section 3.5.8, Noise, and as shown in Tables 3-8 and 3-9, the Project would not expose people to or generate noise levels in excess of standards as established in The Ontario Plan FEIR (Section 5.12). No additional analysis would be required at the time of site development review.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Discussion of Effects: The uses associated with this Project normally do not induce groundborne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. Typical construction vibration is shown on Tables 3-10 and 3-11 which conclude that Project vibration would not expose persons or generate excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels.

Mitigation: None required.
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Discussion of Effects: The Project would not be a significant permanent noise generator and would not cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels because of the limited size and scope of the Project. Moreover, the proposed use would be required to operate within the noise levels permitted for commercial development, pursuant to City of Ontario Development Code. The Project would create typical construction noise as shown in Tables 3-8 and 3-9. Therefore, no increases in noise levels within the vicinity of the project are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Discussion of Effects: Temporary construction activities would minimally impact ambient noise levels. All construction machinery would be maintained according to industry standards to help minimize the impacts. Normal activities associated with the Project are unlikely to increase ambient noise levels. As shown in Tables 3-12, 3-13, and 3-14 show that the Project would not create substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise. A less than significant impact is anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
e) For a project located within the noise impact zones of the airport land use compatibility plan for ONT and Chino Airports, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Discussion of Effects: According to the Safety Element in The Ontario Plan and the Noise Impact Analysis, the proposed site is located within the airport land use plan. However, the Project is located outside of 414
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
the 60 CNEL noise contour. Therefore, the exterior noise impact from the airport would be within the allowable limits for residential land uses and the Project is considered compatible with the surrounding land use and noise environment. Noise from airport operations is expected to generate a less than significant on the proposed Project.

Mitigation: None required.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion of Effects: The Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

14. POPULATION & HOUSING
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)?
Discussion of Effects: The Project is located in a developed area and would not induce population growth as the proposed multi-family DUs have been previously analyzed as part of the OCSP development in the Certified EIR and population growth as part of the OCSP has already been assumed and accounted for in the General Plan and regionally. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated Mitigation: None required.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Discussion of Effects: The Project site is currently undeveloped. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Discussion of Effects: The Project site is currently undeveloped. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

15. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
415
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
i) Fire protection?
Discussion of Effects: The site is in a developed area currently served by the Ontario Fire Department. As previously noted, the site has already been accounted for in the General Plan that it will be developed to include a greater amount of commercial SF and a larger amount of multi-family DUs. The Project would not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. No impacts are anticipated.

However, as part of the development of the OCSP, the Certified EIR noted that the following MMs would be applicable to the development of the OCSP:

Mitigation: Fire Protection
MM-PS-1 The developer will pay a fair share of "in-lieu" fees to subsidize additional facilities and equipment as mutually agreed upon by both the developer and the City of Ontario.

MM-PS-2 All new development will participate in updating the City of Ontario Water Master Plan and will contribute on a "fair share" basis toward implementation of Master Plan programs.

MM-PS-3 Ontario Fire Department and project developer Will provide, in writing, assurance of water supply adequacy from local water purveyor.

MM-PS-4 Design features at the site plan level will reduce risk of fire hazard. Site plan proposals will be reviewed during site plan review by Ontario Fire Department (OFD). Protection measures recommended by the OFD will be implemented by project proponent.

With implementation of MMs PS-1 through PS-4, a less than significant impact on fire services would occur.
ii) Police protection?
Discussion of Effects: The site is in a developed area, currently served by the Ontario Police Department.

The Project would not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities and no impact are anticipated on police protection services. However, as part of the development of the OCSP, the Certified EIR noted that the following MMs would be applicable to the development of the OCSP:

Mitigation: Law Enforcement
MM-PS-5 If a proposed ordinance is adopted, the regional center builder/developer may be required to pay a one-time developer assessment fee to the Police Department at the time of issuance of a building permit. This developer fee will mitigate the fiscal impact incurred by the Police Department.

Due to the projected increase in police calls for service to be generated by the development.

The amount of this fee will be established by the Ontario Police Department based on land use and projected calls-for-service from that use.

MM-PS-6 Each individual project within The Ontario Center will incorporate on-site security measures.

These measures will be reviewed by the Ontario Police Department. They will include, but not be limited to, limited-height landscaping, exterior lighting, security hardware.

MM-PS-7 In addition to these physical security and lighting requirements, the Police Department requests that the developer submit a plan delineating which functions are to be addressed by on-site private security and what functions are to be served by the Police Department. This 416
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
plan may include personnel selection and training and physical security measures, i.e., video surveillance, emergency call boxes, communication and alarms. This plan shall be approved by the Police Department prior to implementation.

With implementation of MMs PS-5 through PS-7, a less than significant impact on police services would occur.
iii) Schools?
Discussion of Effects: The Project would be required to pay school fees as prescribed by state law prior to the issuance of building permits. However, as part of the development of the OCSP, the Certified EIR noted that the following MMs would be applicable to the development of the OCSP:

Mitigation: School
MM-PS-8 Developers of residential projects within The Ontario Center will pay required school impact mitigation fees of $29,000 gross acre to Cucamonga School District per agreement reached between the District and the developer dated December 31, 1986.

MM-PS-9 Developers of projects within The Ontario Center will pay fees, as noted below, to the Chaffey Joint Unified School District:

Residential $.48/square foot
Commercial/Industrial/Office $.08/square foot
iv) Parks?
Discussion of Effects: The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Ontario. The Project would not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. However, as part of the development of the OCSP, the Certified EIR noted that the following MMs would be applicable to the development of the OCSP:

Mitigation: Parks and Recreation
MM-PS-10 Regional Parks: The responsibility for rehabilitating existing regional parks and/or building new facilities, rests with the County of San Bernardino Parks Department. A Draft Ordinance has been prepared by the County Parks Department which will require developers to pay fees for future parks and open space. Developers within The Ontario Center shall comply with the City of Ontario’s implementation of the County’s fee ordinance for the collection of development fees for regional parks, trails, and open space if and when it is enacted.

MM-PS-11 Local Parks: A Park Development Fund Fee of $802/single family detached unit and $700/multiple family unit will be paid at the time of issuance of building permits.

MM-PS-12 Private recreational opportunities shall be encouraged for the commercial retail/industrial use areas.
v) Other public facilities?
Discussion of Effects: The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Ontario. The Project would not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. No impacts are anticipated.
417
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Mitigation: None required.

16. RECREATION
Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion of Effects: This Project is not proposing any significant new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of neighborhood parks or other recreational facilities that have not already been analyzed as part of the OCSP or the Certified EIR and/or considered in the General Plan. Implementation of the proposed Project would not require the construction of neighborhood parks or other recreational facilities. No impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
Would the project:

A Project-specific Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by RK Engineering Group. The results are provided herein, and the technical study is included as Appendix A of this Addendum. a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Discussion of Effects: The Project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. As noted in Table 3-3, the number of vehicle trips per day is forecast at 5,691 daily trips or 5.4 percent compared to the allowable 105,332 daily trips allowable per the OCSP for the site. Therefore, as noted in Section 3.5.5, Traffic and Circulation, the Project would not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections and would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, transit, roadway, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. However, as part of the Certified EIR, the following MMs were imposed as part of the development of the OCSP:

Mitigation: Traffic and Transportation
MM-TRF-1 Buildout in the project vicinity of the proposed circulation system defined in the Specific Plan Amendment will occur.

MM-TRF-2 Development and implementation of a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) program with a goal of a ten percent reduction in peak hour trips will occur as defined the Specific Plan Amendment.

MM-TRF-3 Applicants for all future specific plans and specific plan amendments in the vicinity of The Ontario Center project will be required to complete traffic impact and mitigation studies to ensure that the forty (40) intersections studied this EIR will not exceed an intersection capacity utilization greater than Level of Service E.
418
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
With implementation of the applicable Certified EIR MMs, the Project would have a less than significant impact.
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Discussion of Effects: As noted in Section 3.5.5.1, CEQA Vehicle Miles Traveled, the Project is found to have a less than significant impact regarding VMT.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Discussion of Effects: The Project would not create a substantial safety risk or interfere with air traffic patterns at Ontario International Airport as it either is outside of areas with FAA-imposed height restrictions or is under such height restrictions. No impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Discussion of Effects: The Project is in an area that is mostly developed. All street improvements are complete, and no alterations are proposed for adjacent intersections or arterials. The Project would, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature. No impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Discussion of Effects: The Project would be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and would therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project is in an area that has been previously disturbed by development. No known Tribal Cultural Resource sites exist within the Project area. Thus, tribal artifacts are not expected to be encountered during any excavation, grading, or construction activities.

Mitigation: None required.

19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
419
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project is served by the City of Ontario sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and/or RP-5 treatment plant. The Project is required to meet the requirements of the Ontario Engineering Department regarding wastewater.

Additionally, as noted in Section 2.3, Land Use and Development, the proposed Project would implement a Project at a much lower development intensity than the originally approved project under the OCSP and the Certified EIR. As such, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project is served by the City of Ontario sewer system and which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and/or RP-5 treatment plant. RP-1 and/or RP-5 is not at capacity and this Project would not cause RP-1 and/or RP-5 to exceed capacity. The Project would, therefore, not require the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities, or the expansion of existing facilities. No impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project is served by the City of Ontario. The Project is required to meet the requirements of the Ontario Engineering Department regarding storm drain facilities. Because the Project is much less intense than the previously approved project on the same footprint, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? In making this determination, the City shall consider whether the project is subject to the water supply assessment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, et seq. (SB 610), and the requirements of Government Code Section 664737 (SB 221).

Discussion of Effects: The Project is served by the City of Ontario water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Ontario to serve this project. Additionally, as noted in Table 2-4, the Project is anticipated to require 316,027 GPD compared to the 727,888 GPD of the originally approved project and analyzed under Certified EIR. The proposed Project would require approximately 54 percent of the originally accounted for water demand. Although a less than significant impact is anticipated in this regard, the Certified EIR included the following MMs as part of the original OCSP analysis.

Mitigation: Water Supply
MM-UTL-1 All existing and future users will share in costs of supplemental city-wide water supply system.
420
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
MM-UTL-2 Reclaimed water, as it is available from CBMWD Regional Plant No. 4, will be used for open space irrigation when economically feasible.

MM-UTL-3 Cooperation between CBMWD, the City of Ontario, developers of The Ontario Center and other landowners will be necessary to ensure adequate capacity.

A less than significant impact would occur with implementation of MMs UTL-1 through UTL-3. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
Discussion of Effects: The proposed Project is served by the City of Ontario sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and/or RP-5 treatment plant. RP-1 and/or RP-5 is not at capacity and this project would not cause RP-1 and/or RP-5 to exceed capacity. Although no impact is anticipated in this regard, the Certified EIR included the following MMs as part of the original OCSP analysis.

Mitigation: Wastewater
MM-UTL-4 Design and construction of wastewater collection facilities within the Ontario Center will be completed under the jurisdiction of the City of Ontario.

MM-UTL-5 Any plans for use of the non-reclaim able waste line (NRW ) system will be made known to the City and CBMWD.

MM-UTL-6 Wastewater collection facilities will be designed so that all parcels can be served by gravity mains without pumping.

MM-UTL-7 The Ontario Center project development will coordinate construction activities with the City of Ontario and CBMWD to assure adequate interceptor, trunk sewer and treatment plant capacity is available as development proceeds.

MM-UTL-8 Continued coordination between CBMWD, the City, developers of The Ontario Center, and other property owners/developers will occur to assure adequate capacity is available in the Cucamonga Interceptor as development occurs within the tributary area.

A less than significant impact would occur with implementation of MMs UTL-4 through UTL-8. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
Discussion of Effects: City of Ontario serves the proposed Project. Currently, the City of Ontario contracts with a waste disposal company that transports trash to a landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City’s solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. Although no impact is anticipated in this regard, the Certified EIR included the following MM as part of the original OCSP analysis.

Mitigation: Solid Waste
MM-UTL-9 Solid waste will be disposed of in Milliken Landfill. Upon closing of the Milliken Landfill, waste will be disposed of at the San Timoteo Landfill. A transfer station for the City will be constructed by the City in the next 2 to 3 years to transport waste from Ontario to the San Timoteo Landfill.
421
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
A less than significant impact would occur with implementation of MM UTL-9. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Discussion of Effects: This Project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.

20. Wildfire
Would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Discussion of Effects: According to the General Plan and CAL FIRE, the Project site is not located within a Very High, High, or Medium Fire Hazard area. The Project would not interfere with the City’s Emergency Management Plan because it does not contain any features that would prohibit the execution of such plans. The Project would maintain the existing ingress and egress which were designed to accommodate existing and future growth of the site. No impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation: None required.
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Discussion of Effects: Like most of southern California, the City of Ontario faces a diverse array of potential natural hazards. The General Plan notes that severe windstorms can pose a significant risk to property and life in the region by creating conditions that disrupt essential systems such as public utilities, telecommunications, and transportation routes. High winds, including Santa Ana winds, can cause damage to homes, businesses, landscaping, public property, and utilities, and pose threats to public safety, including accelerating a fire. The alluvial sand that underlies the majority of Ontario is generally granular, poorly consolidated, and very susceptible to erosion. In strong winds this sand can impact property, air quality and visibility. However, no special circumstances occur on the Project that do not occur in the rest of the City of region. No impact from wind hazards is anticipated to occur.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Discussion of Effects: All proposed Project components would be within the Project site property lines, and impacts associated with the development of the Project within this footprint area analyzed throughout this document and has been previously analyzed in the Certified EIR. No impacts are anticipated to occur.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope, or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? 422
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E
Discussion of Effects: As previously analyzed in the Certified EIR, the Project site is not located in a landslide hazard area or a floodplain. No changes in findings in this regard would occur compared to those findings in the Certified EIR for the Project site. As such, no impact in this regard would occur.

Mitigation: None required.

21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat or a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Discussion of Effects: The site is located within an area that has been previously heavily disturbed, mass graded, and partially developed with various uses including multi-family residential DUs and commercial.

The Project is not anticipated to have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or reduce the overall habitat as there is no native habitat.
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals?
Discussion of Effects: The Project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. As shown throughout this addendum, the Project would not cause any more intense impacts than those already previously considered in the Certified EIR, CEA, POCA, and POOC environmental documents.

Mitigation: None required.
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects.) Discussion of Effects: The Project does not have impacts that are cumulatively considerable that have not already been considered in the Certified EIR, CEA, POCA, and POOC environmental documents.

Mitigation: None required.
d) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Discussion of Effects: The Project does not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.

Mitigation: None required.
423
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix A

APPENDIX A

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
424
RK16883
JN:2957-2021-01

TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
City of Ontario, California
Prepared for:

ADEPT DEVELOPMENT
388 Cordova Street, Suite 280
Pasadena, CA 91101
Prepared by:

RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Alex Tabrizi, P.E., T.E.

Michael Torres, E.I.T.

Elias Bandek, E.I.T.

Nhi Ly, E.I.T.

September 17, 2021
425
Table of Contents
Section Page

1.0 Introduction........................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives 1-1

1.2 Site Location & Project Description 1-1

2.0 Study Area & Analysis Methodologies .................................................. 2-1

2.1 Study Area 2-1

2.2 Study Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Analysis Methodology 2-3

2.3 Study Intersection Level of Service (LOS)
Performance Criteria & Thresholds for requiring Improvements 2-5

2.4 VMT Analysis Methodology, Performance Criteria, &
Thresholds of Significance 2-6

3.0 Existing Traffic Volumes & Circulation System ..................................... 3-1

3.1 Existing Traffic Controls and Intersection Geometrics 3-1

3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes 3-1

3.3 City of Ontario Circulation Element 3-4

4.0 Projected & Future Traffic Volumes ...................................................... 4-1

4.1 Project Traffic Conditions 4-1

4.1.1 Trip Generation 4-1

4.1.2 Trip Distribution 4-2

4.1.3 Modal Split 4-2

4.1.4 Project Traffic Volumes/Assignment 4-3

4.2 Existing Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 4-3

4.3 Background Traffic 4-3

4.3.1 Method of Projection 4-3

4.3.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic 4-4

4.4 Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 4-4

4.5 Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 4-5

4.6 Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 4-5

4.7 Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 4-5
426
Table of Contents (Continued)
Section Page

4.8 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 4-6

4.9 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 4-7

5.0 Study Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Analysis........................ 5-1

5.1 Existing Conditions
Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS 5-1

5.2 Existing Plus Project Conditions
Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS 5-1

5.3 Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS 5-2

5.4 Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS 5-2

5.5 Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS 5-3

5.6 Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS 5-4

5.7 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions
Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS 5-5

5.8 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions
Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS 5-6

6.0 CEQA Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis......................................... 6-1

7.0 Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations ......................................... 7-1

7.1 Purpose of Report, Study Objectives & Proposed Project 7-1

7.2 Project Trip Generation 7-2

7.3.1 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Existing Conditions 7-3

7.3.2 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Existing Plus Project Conditions 7-3

7.3.3 Level of Service Analysis Summary
Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions 7-4

7.3.4 Level of Service Analysis Summary
Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions 7-4

7.3.5 Level of Service Analysis Summary
Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions 7-5 427
Table of Contents (Continued)
Section Page

7.3.6 Level of Service Analysis Summary
Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions 7-5

7.3.7 Level of Service Analysis Summary
Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions 7-6

7.3.8 Level of Service Analysis Summary
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions 7-8

7.4 CEQA VMT Analysis Summary 7-9
428
List of Attachments
Exhibits
Location Map ........................................................................................................... 1-1 Site Plan ................................................................................................................... 1-2 Existing Lane Geometry & Traffic Controls ................................................................. 3-1 Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes – Weekday ......................................................... 3-2 Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday.......................................................... 3-3 City of Ontario Typical Street Cross Sections.............................................................. 3-4 City of Ontario Master Plan of Streets and Highways................................................. 3-5 City of Ontario Truck Routes ..................................................................................... 3-6 Outbound Project Trip Distribution............................................................................ 4-1 Inbound Project Trip Distribution .............................................................................. 4-2 Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday............................................................................ 4-3 Project Traffic Volumes – Saturday ............................................................................ 4-4 Existing Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes – Weekday ....................................... 4-5 Existing Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday ....................................... 4-6 Cumulative Projects Location Map............................................................................. 4-7 Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes – Weekday ........................................................ 4-8 Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes – Saturday......................................................... 4-9 Opening Year Without Related Projects
Without Projects Conditions Traffic Volumes – Weekday............................................ 4-10 Opening Year Without Related Projects
Without Projects Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday ............................................ 4-11 429
List of Attachments (Continued)
Exhibits
Opening Year Without Related Projects
With Projects Conditions Traffic Volumes – Weekday................................................. 4-12 Opening Year Without Related Projects
With Projects Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday ................................................. 4-13 Opening Year With Related Projects
Without Projects Conditions Traffic Volumes – Weekday............................................ 4-14 Opening Year With Related Projects
Without Projects Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday ............................................ 4-15 Opening Year With Related Projects
With Projects Conditions Traffic Volumes – Weekday................................................. 4-16 Opening Year With Related Projects
With Projects Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday ................................................. 4-17 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes – Weekday ............. 4-18 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday.............. 4-19 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes – Weekday .................. 4-20 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday................... 4-21 Transit Priority Area .................................................................................................. 6-1 SBCTA VMT Screening Tool Output........................................................................... 6-2 Recommendations.................................................................................................... 7-1 430
List of Attachments (Continued)
Tables
ITE Trip Generation Rates.......................................................................................... 4-1 Proposed Project Trip Generation .............................................................................. 4-2 Cumulative Projects Trip Generation.......................................................................... 4-3 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Existing Conditions .................................................................................................. 5-1 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Existing Plus Project Conditions ................................................................................ 5-2 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Project Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions ............... 5-3 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Project Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions..................... 5-4 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Project Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions..................... 5-5 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Project Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions.......................... 5-6 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions ....................................................... 5-7 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions ............................................................ 5-8 Project Fair-Share Contribution Summary
Opening year With Related Projects With Project Conditions...................................... 7-1 Project Fair-Share Contribution Summary
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions ............................................................ 7-2 431
List of Attachments (Continued)
Appendices
Traffic Counts........................................................................................................... A Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Existing Conditions ................................................................................................... B Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Existing Plus Project Conditions................................................................................. C Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions........................... D Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions................................ E Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions................................ F Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions ..................................... G Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions ....................................................... H Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions ............................................................ I Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions With Improvements ............................. J 432
1-1

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives
The purpose of this traffic study is to assess the impacts of the proposed Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development (hereinafter referred to as project) from a traffic and circulation stand point.

This study has been conducted in accordance with the guidelines detailed in The Ontario General Plan Update Transportation Technical Report (March 19, 2009) and recommendations and practices described in the City of Ontario Planning Commission Resolution No. PC20-021 (May 26, 2020).

The study has been prepared in accordance with the scope of work discussed and approved by City staff prior to initiating the analysis.

1.2 Site Location & Project Description
The proposed project is located adjacent to the Toyota Arena, north of Concours Street and south of 4
th Street, in the City of Ontario.

The land uses surrounding the site include residential uses to the north, commercial uses to the south and west, and commercial and retail uses to the east at the Ontario Mills Shopping Center. The proposed project consists of the construction and operation of a mixed-use town center development with residential and commercial/retail land uses. The following is a breakdown of the project’s development plan:

Proposed Development Plan
Lot Dwelling Units (DU) Retail (SF) Parking Spaces
A 359 25,256 477*
B 98 20,802 130*
C 107 11,047 142*
D 127 14,095 170*
F & G - - - - 1,170
Total 691 71,200 2,089
* Parking structure
433
1-1
Main access for the project is planned via the following:
 One (1) signalized intersection at Cleveland Avenue – Via Asti / 4th Street;  One (1) signalized intersection at Resort Parkway – Via Piemonte / 4th Street;  One (1) right-in/right-out access driveway along 4th Street; and The project is planned to open in 2023 and will be evaluated in one single phase.

The project site’s location map is shown in Exhibit 1-1. The project site plan is shown in Exhibit 1-2.
434
435
436
2-1

2.0 Study Area & Analysis Methodologies
This section of the report presents the analysis study area and the methodologies used to perform the traffic analyses summarized in this report in accordance with the City of Ontario requirements.

Furthermore, this section of the report also discusses the agency-established performance criteria and thresholds of significance for the study facilities.

2.1 Study Area
The traffic analysis study area includes intersections where the proposed project may potentially create traffic impacts to traffic operations and conditions.

The traffic impact analysis evaluates the following study area intersections:

1. Haven Avenue (NS) / 4TH Street (EW);

2. Cleveland Avenue – Via Asti (NS) / 4
th Street (EW);

3. Resort Parkway – Via Piemonte (NS) / 4
th Street (EW);

4. Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW);

5. Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4
th Street (EW);

6. I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4
th Street (EW);

7. I-15 NB Ramps (NS) / 4
th Street (EW);

8. Haven Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW);

9. Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW);

10.Milliken Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW);

11.Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW);
437
2-2

12.Milliken Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW);

13.Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 WB Ramps (EW);

14.Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps (EW);

15.Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW); and

16.Milliken Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW).

The study evaluates the following study scenarios for AM, PM, and Saturday peak hour conditions:
 Existing Conditions;
 Existing Plus Project Conditions;
 Project Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions;  Project Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions;  Project Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions;  Project Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions;  Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions; and
 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions.

The analysis evaluates the following time frames:
 Weekday AM peak period of 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM
 Weekday PM peak period of 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
 Saturday mid-day peak period of 12:45 PM to 2:45 PM (Saturday peak period of traffic was determined by review of existing 24-hour volumes in the project site vicinity)
438
2-3

2.2 Study Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Analysis Methodology In accordance with The Ontario General Plan Update Transportation Technical Report (March 19, 2009), the Highway Capacity Manual Sixth Edition (HCM 6) is utilized as the technical guide in the evaluation of traffic operations.

The HCM defines level of service as a qualitative measure which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of factors such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety.

The criteria used to evaluate LOS (Level of Service) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted.

The definitions of level of service for uninterrupted flow (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices) are:
 LOS A represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream.
 LOS B is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver.  LOS C is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream.
 LOS D represents high-density but stable flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience.
 LOS E represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow will cause breakdowns in traffic movement.
 LOS F is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. 439
2-4
The level of service is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The levels of service determined in this study are calculated using the HCM methodology.

For signalized intersections, average control delay per vehicle is used to determine the level of service. Levels of service at signalized study intersections have been evaluated using the HCM intersection analysis program.

Study area intersections, which are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only, have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these intersections, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected, describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at these locations, the level of service has been calculated. The level of service is determined based on the worst individual movement or movements sharing a single lane. The relationship between level of service and delay is different than for signalized intersections.

Table 2-1 shows the level of service criteria based on the HCM methodology.

Table 2-1
HCM Level of Service – Vehicle Delay
LOS
Intersection LOS Criteria
Signalized Delay
(Seconds)
Unsignalized Delay
(Seconds)
A 0.00 - 10.00 0.00 - 10.00
B 10.01 - 20.00 10.01 - 15.00
C 20.01 - 35.00 15.01 - 25.00
D 35.01 - 55.00 25.01 - 35.00
E 55.01 - 80.00 35.01 - 50.00
F >80.01 >50.01
This analysis also utilizes recommended saturation flow rate described in the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program 2016 Update, June 2016, 2021. The 440
2-5
following saturation flow rates were utilized in the evaluation of LOS for Existing, Opening Year, and Horizon Year (2040) scenarios:

Existing and Opening Year Scenarios
 Exclusive Thru: 1,800 vehicles per hour green per lane (vphgpl)  Exclusive Left: 1,700 vphgpl
 Exclusive Right: 1,800 vphgpl
 Exclusive Double Left: 1,600 vphgpl
 Exclusive Triple Left: 1,500 vphgpl
Horizon Year (2040) Scenarios
 Exclusive Thru: 1,900 vphgpl
 Exclusive Left: 1,800 vphgpl
 Exclusive Right: 1,900 vphgpl
 Exclusive Double Left: 1,700 vphgpl
 Exclusive Triple Left: 1,600 vphgpl

2.3 Study Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Performance Criteria & Thresholds for Requiring Improvements
The following is a summary of the performance criteria adopted by the City of Ontario.

Performance Criteria:

The acceptable LOS for intersections in the City of Ontario is LOS E or better as established in the City’s General Plan. Any intersection operating at a LOS F is considered deficient.
441
2-6
Threshold for Requiring Level of Service Improvements:

Any study intersection operating at a deficient LOS (LOS F) will require improvements to restore the intersection to acceptable conditions (LOS E).

2.4 VMT Analysis Methodology, Performance Criteria, & Thresholds of Significance
Effective July 1st, 2020, the longstanding metric of roadway level of service (LOS), which is typically measured in terms of vehicle delay, roadway capacity and congestion, will no longer be considered a significant impact under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.3, VMT is now the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts.

The City of Ontario follows the guidelines detailing the appropriate VMT methodologies, thresholds of significance, and feasible mitigation measures as described in the City of Ontario Planning Commission Resolution No. PC20-021 (May 26, 2020).

This analysis follows the practices and recommendations in the City of Ontario Planning Commission Resolution No. PC20-021 (May 26, 2020).
442
3-1

3.0 Existing Traffic Volumes & Circulation System
This section provides a discussion of existing study area conditions and traffic volumes.

3.1 Existing Traffic Controls and Intersection Geometrics Exhibit 3-1 identifies the existing roadway conditions within the study area. The number of through traffic lanes for existing roadways and existing intersection controls are identified.

The type of traffic control and number of lanes at an intersection are key inputs for the calculation of level of service.

3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes
Due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, collection of new and valid traffic counts may not be feasible. After discussions with City staff, methodologies were approved to utilize historical traffic data that predate the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic after application of a two percent (2%) growth rate per year to derive existing (2021) traffic conditions.

As previously noted, the analysis evaluates the following time frames:
 Weekday AM peak period of 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM
 Weekday PM peak period of 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
 Saturday mid-day peak period of 12:45 PM to 2:45 PM (Saturday peak period of traffic was determined by review of existing 24-hour volumes in the project site vicinity)
Existing Conditions – Weekday:

After reviewing available pre-pandemic traffic count data provided by RK’s traffic count sub-consultants, pre-pandemic traffic counts (years vary) were identified for all study area intersections with exception to the following. For all the locations that pre-pandemic data was available, RK derived Existing 2021 non pandemic conditions traffic volumes by applying an annual growth rate of 2 percent per year to bring the older counts to 2021 conditions.
443
3-2
 Cleveland Avenue – Via Asti (NS) / 4th Street (EW);
 Resort Parkway – Via Piemonte (EW);
 Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW); and
 Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW).

As a result, the following methodology was performed to derive valid weekday conditions existing (2021) traffic count data for the aforementioned study intersections.

1. Collect 2021 Field Counts: Existing (2021) traffic count data were collected at the following intersections:
 Cleveland Avenue – Via Asti (NS) / 4
th Street (EW);
 Resort Parkway – Via Piemonte (NS) / 4th Street (EW);  Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW);
 Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW); and  The nearby intersection of Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)

2. Derive 2021 Counts from Pre-Pandemic Counts: Using the available prepandemic conditions traffic counts from 2016 at the nearby Milliken Avenue / 4th Street intersection, RK projected 2021 traffic count data for the Milliken Avenue / 4th Street intersection from the 2016 pre-pandemic counts by applying a growth rate of two percent (2%) per year for five (5) years.

3. Determine Adjustment Factor for Converting Pandemic Conditions to Nonpandemic Conditions: RK compared the 2021 field collected counts at the nearby intersection of Milliken Avenue / 4th Street as part of Step 1 to the derived 2021 traffic count volumes at this intersection from Step 2 and determine an appropriate adjustment factor to convert between pandemic and non-pandemic conditions. 444
3-3

4. Derive 2021 Non-Pandemic Conditions Counts at the Study Intersection:

Using the adjustment factor derived as part of Step 3, RK converted the 2021 counts collected at the other four (4) study intersections defined in Step 1 into nonpandemic traffic volumes for 2021.

Exhibit 3-2 shows the weekday conditions existing (2021) conditions traffic volumes for the study area.

Existing Conditions – Saturday:

No historical pre-pandemic traffic count data was available for Saturday Conditions. As a result, the following methodology was performed to derive valid Saturday conditions existing (2021) traffic count data.

In order to determine the Saturday two-hour timeframe to evaluate traffic conditions for the proposed project, a newly collected 24-hour Saturday ADT was obtained along the segment of:
 4
th Street from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue.

The Saturday peak two-hour time frame was identified from the newly collected 24-hour Saturday ADT, RK utilized the following methodology in order to derive valid existing Saturday (2021) traffic count data for the sixteen (16) study area intersections.

1. Collect 24-Hour ADT Counts: A newly collected 24-hour ADT along the segment of 4
th Street from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue was performed to determine the Saturday two-hour timeframe of analysis.

2. Collect 2021 Field Counts: Existing Saturday (2021) traffic count data was newly collected at all study area intersections.

3. Utilize Adjustment Factor for Converting Pandemic Conditions to Nonpandemic Conditions: Utilizing the adjustment factor derived in Step 3 of the weekday conditions traffic count methodology, RK converted the newly collected existing Saturday (2021) pandemic conditions counts to existing Saturday (2021) non-pandemic conditions.
445
3-4
Exhibit 3-3 shows the Saturday conditions existing (2021) conditions traffic volumes for the study area.

The weekday and Saturday traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix A.

3.3 City of Ontario Circulation Element
The City of Ontario Typical Street Cross Sections are shown in Exhibit 3-4.

The City of Ontario Master Plan of Streets and Highways are shown in Exhibit 3-5.

The City of Ontario Trucks Routes are shown in Exhibit 3-6. 446
447
448
449
450
451
452
4-1

4.0 Projected & Future Traffic Volumes
This section of the report provides a discussion on methodologies utilized to derive future traffic volumes for the study area.

4.1 Project Traffic Conditions

4.1.1 Trip Generation
Trip generation represents the amount of traffic that is attracted and produced by a development. The trip generation for the project is based upon the specific land uses that have been planned for this development.

Trip generation is typically estimated based on the trip generation rates from the latest Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017). This publication provides a comprehensive evaluation of trip generation rates for a variety of land uses.

Table 4-1 shows the ITE trip generation rates for the trip generation analysis of the project land uses.

Utilizing the trip generation rates from Table 4-1, Table 4-2 summarizes the daily and peak hour trip generation for weekday and Saturday conditions for the proposed project.

As shown in Table 4-2, based on the ITE trip generation rates:
 The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 6,447 weekday daily trips which include approximately 315 weekday AM peak hour trips, approximately 575 weekday PM peak hour trips.
 The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 6,677 Saturday daily trips which include approximately 624 Saturday peak hour trips.

An internal trip capture reduction is applicable when a project site has more than one destination (such as the proposed project), in which a person visits more than one destination onsite during the same visit. The project site’s retail component will 453
4-2
provide various land uses which will allow a patron to visit more than one destination on a single trip.

Furthermore, a portion of these trips (pass-by trips) are already on the roadway network making an intermediate stop on their way to a primary destination.

Therefore, as also shown in Table 4-2, after accounting for internal trip capture and applicable ITE pass-by trips rates:
 The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 5,691 weekday daily trips which include approximately 300 weekday AM peak hour trips, approximately 458 weekday PM peak hour trips.
 The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 5,813 Saturday daily trips which include approximately 490 Saturday peak hour trips.

4.1.2 Trip Distribution
Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. Trip distribution is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site and the proximity to the regional freeway system. The directional orientation of traffic was determined by evaluating existing and proposed land uses and highways within the study area.

The project outbound trip distribution is shown in Exhibit 4-1.

The project inbound trip distribution is shown in Exhibit 4-2.

4.1.3 Modal Split
Modal split denotes the proportion of traffic generated by a project that would use any of the transportation modes, namely buses, cars, bicycles, motorcycles, trains, carpools, etc. The traffic-reducing potential of public transit and other modes is significant. However, the traffic projections in this study are conservative in that public transit and alternative transportation may be able to reduce the traffic volumes, but, no modal split reduction is applied to the projections. With the implementation of transit service and provision of alternative transportation ideas and incentives, the automobile traffic demand can be reduced significantly. 454
4-3

4.1.4 Project Traffic Volumes/Assignment
The assignment of project traffic to the adjoining roadway system is based upon the project’s trip generation, trip distribution, arterial highway, and local street systems that would be in place by the time of initial occupancy of the site.

Weekday project traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 4-3. Saturday project traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 4-4.

4.2 Existing Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes
Weekday Existing Plus Project Conditions traffic volumes consist of the summation of the weekday existing traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 3-2 and the weekday project traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4-3.

Weekday Existing Plus Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-5.

Saturday Existing Plus Project Conditions traffic volumes consist of the summation of the Saturday existing traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 3-3 and the Saturday project traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4-4.

Saturday Existing Plus Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-6.

4.3 Background Traffic

4.3.1 Method of Projection
To assess future conditions, project traffic is combined with existing traffic and areawide growth. As directed by City staff, to account for area-wide/ambient growth in the study area, an annual growth rate of two percent (2%) per year has been applied to the existing (2021) traffic volumes over a 2-year period from 2021 to opening year (2023). Similarly, an annual growth rate of two percent (2%) per year has been applied to the existing (2021) traffic volumes over a 19-year period from 2021 to horizon year (2040).
455
4-4

4.3.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic
Information on future projects in the vicinity of the study area has been provided by City of Ontario and City of Rancho Cucamonga staff for inclusion in this analysis and is shown in Table 4-3.

The list of cumulative projects provided are for projects that have been officially submitted for land use review, are waiting public hearing approval, or have been approved by the public hearing body.

Table 4-3 shows the land uses, weekday and Saturday trip generation for the nearby cumulative projects provided by the public agencies.

A location map of the cumulative projects is shown in Exhibit 4-7.

Weekday cumulative projects traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 4-8. Saturday cumulative projects traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 4-9.

In reality, some of the cumulative projects may be downsized or may not be developed by project opening year (2023). In addition, many of the related projects have been or will be subject to a variety of mitigation measures that will reduce the potential environmental impacts associated with those projects. However, those mitigation measures have not been taken into account in projecting the environmental impact of the related projects.

Therefore, the cumulative analyses set forth below are conservative and could result in greater impacts than actually anticipated. Additionally, the analysis utilizes a growth rate of two percent (2%) per year for project opening year (2023) conditions, which would already capture and account for most projects in the area.

The growth rate methodology is considered conservative since it is applied to all movements in all the study intersections.

4.4 Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes
Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions traffic volumes consist of two (2) years of annual growth on top of existing (2021) traffic volumes at two percent (2%) per year.
456
4-5
Weekday Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-10.

Saturday Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-11.

4.5 Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes
Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions traffic volumes consist of two (2) years of annual growth on top of existing (2021) traffic volumes at two percent (2%) per year, plus the traffic generated by the proposed project.

Weekday Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-12.

Saturday Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-13.

4.6 Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes
Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions traffic volumes consist of two (2) years of annual growth on top of existing (2021) traffic volumes at two percent (2%) per year, plus the traffic generated by the cumulative projects.

Weekday Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-14.

Saturday Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-15.

4.7 Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes
Weekday Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions traffic volumes consist of two (2) years of annual growth on top of existing (2021) traffic volumes at two 457
4-6
percent (2%) per year, plus the traffic generated by the cumulative projects and proposed project.

Weekday Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-16.

Saturday Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-17.

4.8 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions traffic volumes consist of nineteen (19) years of annual growth on top of existing (2021) traffic volumes at two percent (2%) per year.

Weekday Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-18.

Saturday Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-19.

4.9 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions traffic volumes are derived by adding the project-generated traffic to Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions traffic volumes.

Weekday Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-20.

Saturday Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-21.
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Multifamily Housing (Medium Rise) DU 221 0.09 0.27 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.44 5.44 0.22 0.22 0.44 4.91 Retail TSF 820 0.58 0.36 0.94 1.83 1.98 3.81 37.75 2.34 2.16 4.50 46.12 1 Source: 2017 ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition). 2 DU = Dwelling Units
TSF= Thousand Square Feet.
3 ITE Saturday peak hour of generator trip rates utilized.

PM
Daily
Table 4-1
ITE Trip Generation Rates1
AM SAT3
Daily
Land Use Units2ITE Code
Weekday Weekend
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01 480
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Multifamily Housing (Medium Rise) (221) 691 DU 65 184 249 185 119 304 3,759 149 155 304 3,393 -3 -9 -12 -9 -6 -15 -188 -7 -8 -15 -170
62 175 237 176 113 289 3,571 142 147 289 3,223
Retail (820) 71.2 TSF 41 25 66 130 141 271 2,688 167 154 320 3,284 -2 -1 -3 -7 -7 -14 -134 -8 -8 -16 -164
39 24 63 123 134 257 2,554 159 146 304 3,120
0 0 0 -42 -46 -88 -434 -54 -50 -103 -530
39 24 63 81 88 169 2,120 105 96 201 2,590
106 209 315 315 260 575 6,447 316 309 624 6,677
101 199 300 257 201 458 5,691 247 243 490 5,813
1 Source: 2017 ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition). 2 DU = Dwelling Units
TSF= Thousand Square Feet.

Internal Trip Capture (5% AM, 5% PM, 5% Sat, 5% Daily)
Table 4-2
Proposed Project Trip Generation1
AM SAT
Daily
PM
Daily
Land Use (ITE Code) Quantity Units2
Weekday Weekend
Project Trip Generation (Without Pass-by or Internal Capture) Subtotal Residential
Internal Trip Capture (5% AM, 5% PM, 5% Sat, 5% Daily)
Subtotal after Internal Trip Capture
Pass-by (0% AM, 34% PM, 34% SAT, 17% Daily)
Subtotal Retail
Project Trip Generation With Internal Capture and Pass-By j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01
481
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
RC 1 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2019-00371 General Office 12.000 TSF 12 2 14 2 12 14 3 3 6 117 General Office 184.364 TSF 184 30 214 34 178 212 53 45 98 1,796 Retail 15.811 TSF 9 6 15 29 31 60 50 50 100 597
205 38 243 65 221 286 106 98 204 2,510
Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 207 DU 22 73 95 73 43 116 72 72 145 1,515 Retail 14.300 TSF 8 5 13 26 28 54 45 45 91 540
30 78 108 99 71 170 117 117 236 2,055
RC 4 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2019-00766 Warehousing 143.014 TSF 19 6 25 7 20 27 5 3 7 249 RC 6 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2020-00026 Warehousing 23.380 TSF 3 1 4 1 3 4 1 0 1 41 22 7 29 8 23 31 6 3 8 290
RC 5 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2018-00529 Industrial 198.000 TSF 122 17 139 16 109 125 38 43 81 982 RC 7 Rancho Cucamonga 5th and Hermosa Warehouse Warehousing 140.000 TSF 18 5 23 7 19 26 4 3 7 244 140 22 162 23 128 151 42 46 88 1,226
RC 8 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2017-00925 Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 296 DU 31 105 136 104 61 165 104 104 207 2,167 RC 9 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2018-00784 Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 135 DU 14 48 62 48 28 76 47 47 95 988 RC 10 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2018-00851 Single Family Homes 80 DU 15 44 59 50 29 79 40 34 74 755 RC 11 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2019-00674 Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 867 DU 92 307 399 306 180 486 303 303 607 6,346 152 504 656 508 298 806 494 488 983 10,256
RC 12 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2020-00212 High Cube Warehouse 2,200.000 TSF 136 40 176 62 158 220 132 132 264 3,080 136 40 176 62 158 220 132 132 264 3,080
O 1 Ontario Top Golf - Recreation Golf Course 13.800 ACRES 2 1 3 1 3 4 1 3 4 52 2 1 3 1 3 4 1 3 4 52
O 2 Ontario File No. 21-013 Retail 91.163 TSF 53 33 86 167 181 348 289 289 579 3,441 53 33 86 167 181 348 289 289 579 3,441
O 3 Ontario File No. PDEV19-054 Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 72 DU 8 26 34 25 15 40 25 25 50 527 O 4 Ontario File No. PDEV19-061 Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 110 DU 12 39 51 39 23 62 39 39 77 805 20 65 85 64 38 102 64 64 127 1,332
O 5 Ontario File No. PDEV21-021 Hotel 138 RM 38 27 65 42 41 83 39 39 77 1,154 38 27 65 42 41 83 39 39 77 1,154
O 6 Ontario File No. PDEV19-024 Retail 329.850 TSF 192 118 310 603 653 1,256 1,047 1,047 2,095 12,452 192 118 310 603 653 1,256 1,047 1,047 2,095 12,452
O 7 Ontario File No. PDEV19-067 Hotel 265 RM 73 51 124 81 78 159 74 74 148 2,215 O 8 Ontario File No. PDEV17-016 Hotel 124 RM 34 24 58 38 36 74 35 35 69 1,037 107 75 182 119 114 233 109 109 217 3,252
O 9 Ontario File No. PDEV20-008 High Cube Warehouse 200.000 TSF 12 4 16 6 14 20 12 12 24 280 O 10 Ontario File No. PDEV21-018 Warehousing 168.000 TSF 22 7 29 9 23 32 5 3 8 292 34 11 45 15 37 52 17 15 32 572
1,131 1,019 2,150 1,776 1,966 3,742 2,463 2,450 4,914 41,672 1 Cumulative Projects information provided by the City of Ontario and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet;
DU = Dwelling Units;
RM = Rooms.

TAZ 13
TAZ 13 Total
Total Cumulative Projects Trip Generation
TAZ 12 Total
TAZ 7
TAZ 7 Total
TAZ 8
TAZ 8 Total
TAZ 9
TAZ 9 Total
TAZ 10
TAZ 10 Total
TAZ 11
TAZ 11 Total
TAZ 12
TAZ 6 Total
RC 3 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2017-00654
TAZ 2 Total
TAZ 3
TAZ 3 Total
TAZ 4
TAZ 4 Total
TAZ 5
TAZ 5 Total
TAZ 6
TAZ 2

AM PM SAT
TAZ 1
RC 2 Rancho Cucamonga DRC2018-00889
TAZ 1 Total
Table 4-3
Cumulative Projects Trip Generation1
ID No. Jurisdiction Project Name /
Case Number Land Use Quantity Units2
Peak Hour
Daily
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01
482
5-1

5.0 Study Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Analysis

5.1 Existing Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS Existing Conditions level of service (LOS) calculations for the study intersections are shown in Table 5-1 and are based upon the existing (2021) traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 3-2 and Exhibit 3-3, as well as the existing geometry shown in Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-1, the study intersections are all currently operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Existing Conditions with exception of the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4
th Street (EW)
o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (82.4 secs)
Detailed LOS analysis sheets for Existing Conditions are contained in Appendix B.

5.2 Existing Plus Project Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS Existing Plus Project Conditions level of service (LOS) calculations for the study intersections are shown in Table 5-2 and are based upon the Existing Plus Project Conditions traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4-5 and Exhibit 4-6, as well as the existing geometry shown in Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-2, the study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project Conditions with exception of the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (82.7 secs)
483
5-2
As also shown in Table 5-2, based on agency-established thresholds, the proposed project is required to contribute to improvements at the following study intersection for Existing Plus Project Conditions:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) After review of the existing roadway conditions at this intersection, no feasible intersection improvements can be identified for this study intersection to achieve acceptable level of service (LOS E or better) for Existing Plus Project Conditions.

Detailed LOS analysis sheets for Existing Plus Project Conditions are contained in Appendix C.

5.3 Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS
Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions level of service (LOS) calculations for the study intersections are shown in Table 5-3 and are based upon the Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4-10 and Exhibit 4-11, as well as the existing geometry shown in Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-3, the study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions with exception of the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (90.4 secs)
Detailed LOS analysis sheets for Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions are contained in Appendix D.

5.4 Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS
Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions level of service (LOS) calculations for the study intersections are shown in Table 5-4 and are based upon the Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4-12 and Exhibit 4-13, as well as the existing geometry shown in Exhibit 3-1. 484
5-3
As shown in Table 5-4, the study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions with exception of the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (90.8 secs)
As also shown in Table 5-4, based on agency-established thresholds, the proposed project is required to contribute to improvements at the following study intersection for Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) After review of the existing roadway conditions at this intersection, no feasible intersection improvements can be identified for this study intersection to achieve acceptable level of service (LOS E or better) for Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions.

Detailed LOS analysis sheets for Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions are contained in Appendix E.

5.5 Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS
Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions level of service (LOS) calculations for the study intersections are shown in Table 5-5 and are based upon the Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4-14 and Exhibit 4-15, as well as the existing geometry shown in Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-5, the study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions with exception to the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (94.4 secs)
485
5-4
o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (113.9 secs)
Detailed LOS analysis sheets for Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions are contained in Appendix F.

5.6 Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS
Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions level of service (LOS) calculations for the study intersections are shown in Table 5-6 and are based upon the Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4-16 and Exhibit 4-17, as well as the existing geometry shown in Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-6, the study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions with exception to the following study intersections:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (97.0 secs)
o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (116.1 secs)
As also shown in Table 5-6, based on agency-established thresholds, the proposed project is required to contribute to improvements at the following study intersection for Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) After review of the existing roadway conditions at this intersection, no feasible intersection improvements can be identified for this study intersection to achieve acceptable level of service (LOS E or better) for Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions.

Detailed LOS analysis sheets for Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions are contained in Appendix G.
486
5-5

5.7 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions
Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS
Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions level of service (LOS) calculations for the study intersections are shown in Table 5-7 and are based upon the weekday and Saturday Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4-18 and Exhibit 4-19, as well as the existing geometry shown in Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-7, the study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions with exception to the following study intersection:
 Int #1: Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (98.0 secs)
 Int #4: Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (51.9 secs)
 Int #5: Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (103.9 secs)
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o AM Peak Hour LOS – F (118.2 secs)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (149.3 secs)
o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (180.2 secs)
 Int #11: Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW) o PM Peak Hour LOS – F (134.7 secs)
487
5-6
 Int #14: Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (82.2 secs)
Detailed LOS analysis sheets for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions are contained in Appendix H.

5.8 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions
Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions level of service (LOS) calculations for the study intersections are shown in Table 5-8 and are based upon the weekday and Saturday Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4-20 and Exhibit 4-21, as well as the existing geometry shown in Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-8, the study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions with exception to the following study intersections:
 Int #1: Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (102.3 secs)
 Int #4 Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (73.8 secs)
 Int #5: Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (109.7 secs)
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o AM Peak Hour LOS – F (119.0 secs)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (152.9 secs)
o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (184.8 secs)
488
5-7
 Int #11: Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW) o PM Peak Hour LOS – F (136.5 secs)
 Int #14: Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (87.3 secs)
As also shown in Table 5-8, based on agency-established thresholds, the proposed project is required to contribute to improvements at the following study intersection for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions:
 Int #1: Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #4: Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #5: Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW)  Int #11: Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)  Int #14: Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps (EW) After review of the existing roadway conditions at these study intersections, no feasible intersection improvements can be identified for the following study intersections to achieve acceptable level of service (LOS E or better) for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions.
 Int #1: Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #4: Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #5: Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) 489
5-8
 Int #11: Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW) The following recommended improvements are identified to restore the intersection of Milliken Avenue / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps to acceptable conditions (LOS E for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions:

Intersection Improvement #1 Int 14 – Milliken Avenue / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps: Make
a fair-share contribution to widen the
eastbound off-ramp approach from two
left turn lanes, one through lane and one
right turn lane to three left turn lanes, one
through lane, and one right turn lane.

Detailed LOS analysis sheets for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions are contained in Appendix I.

Detailed LOS analysis sheets for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions With Improvements are contained in Appendix J.
490

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT

1. TS 29.3 46.0 27.4 C D C

2. TS 10.2 9.4 7.9 B A A

3. TS 7.9 6.7 7.5 A A A

4. CSS 11.0 23.2 15.0 B C B

5. TS 27.4 48.1 39.7 C D D

6. TS 49.3 67.1 82.4 D E F

7. TS 21.1 32.5 29.7 C C C

8. TS 14.5 13.0 12.0 B B B

9. TS 8.0 7.7 4.4 A A A

10. TS 13.3 20.2 19.7 B C B

11. TS 21.4 53.3 19.6 C D B

12. TS 15.3 22.9 25.2 B C C

13. TS 21.6 9.5 8.0 C A A

14. TS 21.2 36.0 38.4 C D D

15. TS 24.8 9.6 12.9 C A B

16. TS 15.1 11.6 13.1 B B B
1 2
3 CSS = Cross-Street Stop
Cleveland Avenue - Via Asti (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Intersection Traffic
Control3
Delay
(Secs)1,2 Level of Service
Table 5-1
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Existing Conditions
Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway - I-10 WB Ramps (EW) Resort Parkway - Via Piemonte (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) I-15 NB Ramps (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 WB Ramps (EW)
Deficient operation shown in Bold.

TS = Traffic Signal
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
HCM Analysis Software: Synchro, Version 10.0. Per the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all-way stop control. For intersections with cross-street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01 491

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT

1. TS 29.3 46.0 27.4 C D C 30.3 48.6 29.6 1.0 2.6 2.2 C D C NO NO NO

2. TS 10.2 9.4 7.9 B A A 11.4 10.1 9.4 1.2 0.7 1.5 B B A NO NO NO

3. TS 7.9 6.7 7.5 A A A 8.3 8.0 8.3 0.4 1.3 0.8 A A A NO NO NO

4. CSS 11.0 23.2 15.0 B C B 11.3 26.4 16.3 0.3 3.2 1.3 B D C NO NO NO

5. TS 27.4 48.1 39.7 C D D 27.7 49.9 41.6 0.3 1.8 1.9 C D D NO NO NO

6. TS 49.3 67.1 82.4 D E F 50.1 67.7 82.7 0.8 0.6 0.3 D E F NO NO YES

7. TS 21.1 32.5 29.7 C C C 21.5 34.0 31.2 0.4 1.5 1.5 C C C NO NO NO

8. TS 14.5 13.0 12.0 B B B 14.5 13.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 B B B NO NO NO

9. TS 8.0 7.7 4.4 A A A 10.1 10.3 7.1 2.1 2.6 2.7 B B A NO NO NO

10. TS 13.3 20.2 19.7 B C B 14.1 21.9 21.3 0.8 1.7 1.6 B C C NO NO NO

11. TS 21.4 53.3 19.6 C D B 21.5 53.6 19.7 0.1 0.3 0.1 C D B NO NO NO

12. TS 15.3 22.9 25.2 B C C 15.5 23.2 25.6 0.2 0.3 0.4 B C C NO NO NO

13. TS 21.6 9.5 8.0 C A A 21.7 9.5 8.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 C A A NO NO NO

14. TS 21.2 36.0 38.4 C D D 21.7 38.8 40.9 0.5 2.8 2.5 C D D NO NO NO

15. TS 24.8 9.6 12.9 C A B 25.2 10.0 13.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 C A B NO NO NO

16. TS 15.1 11.6 13.1 B B B 15.1 11.9 13.5 0.0 0.3 0.4 B B B NO NO NO 1 2
3 CSS = Cross-Street Stop
Table 5-2
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Existing Plus Project Conditions
Increase in Delay Level of Service
Requires
Improvement?
Existing Conditions Existing Plus
Project Conditions
Delay
(Secs)1,2 Level of Service
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Deficient operation shown in Bold.

TS = Traffic Signal
Delay
(Secs)1,2
Intersection Traffic
Control3
HCM Analysis Software: Synchro, Version 10.0. Per the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all-way stop control. For intersections with cross-street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown.

Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 WB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway - I-10 WB Ramps (EW) Resort Parkway - Via Piemonte (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) I-15 NB Ramps (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Cleveland Avenue - Via Asti (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01
492

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT

1. TS 30.4 49.0 28.3 C D C

2. TS 10.1 9.4 7.8 B A A

3. TS 7.9 6.8 7.5 A A A

4. CSS 11.1 24.5 15.5 B C C

5. TS 28.9 51.6 42.4 C D D

6. TS 54.4 73.7 90.4 D E F

7. TS 22.0 35.1 31.6 C D C

8. TS 14.9 13.5 12.2 B B B

9. TS 8.0 7.8 4.4 A A A

10. TS 13.5 20.8 20.2 B C C

11. TS 22.4 58.6 20.4 C E C

12. TS 15.6 23.9 26.6 B C C

13. TS 23.3 10.0 8.3 C A A

14. TS 22.0 38.3 41.2 C D D

15. TS 27.4 10.2 13.7 C B B

16. TS 15.9 12.1 13.8 B B B
1 2
3 CSS = Cross-Street Stop
TS = Traffic Signal
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 WB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway - I-10 WB Ramps (EW) Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Deficient operation shown in Bold.

HCM Analysis Software: Synchro, Version 10.0. Per the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all-way stop control. For intersections with cross-street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown.

Milliken Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Cleveland Avenue - Via Asti (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Resort Parkway - Via Piemonte (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) I-15 NB Ramps (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Table 5-3
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Project Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions Intersection Traffic
Control3
Delay
(Secs)1,2 Level of Service
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01 493

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT

1. TS 30.4 49.0 28.3 C D C 31.4 51.8 30.6 1.0 2.8 2.3 C D C NO NO NO

2. TS 10.1 9.4 7.8 B A A 11.3 10.1 9.4 1.2 0.7 1.6 B B A NO NO NO

3. TS 7.9 6.8 7.5 A A A 8.3 8.0 8.3 0.4 1.2 0.8 A A A NO NO NO

4. CSS 11.1 24.5 15.5 B C C 11.4 28.3 16.8 0.3 3.8 1.3 B D C NO NO NO

5. TS 28.9 51.6 42.4 C D D 29.2 53.6 44.2 0.3 2.0 1.8 C D D NO NO NO

6. TS 54.4 73.7 90.4 D E F 55.3 74.6 90.8 0.9 0.9 0.4 E E F NO NO YES

7. TS 22.0 35.1 31.6 C D C 22.4 36.8 33.3 0.4 1.7 1.7 C D C NO NO NO

8. TS 14.9 13.5 12.2 B B B 14.9 13.5 12.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 B B B NO NO NO

9. TS 8.0 7.8 4.4 A A A 10.1 10.4 7.0 2.1 2.6 2.6 B B A NO NO NO

10. TS 13.5 20.8 20.2 B C C 14.2 22.7 21.8 0.7 1.9 1.6 B C C NO NO NO

11. TS 22.4 58.6 20.4 C E C 22.5 59.0 20.6 0.1 0.4 0.2 C E C NO NO NO

12. TS 15.6 23.9 26.6 B C C 15.7 24.2 27.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 B C C NO NO NO

13. TS 23.3 10.0 8.3 C A A 23.4 10.0 8.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 C A A NO NO NO

14. TS 22.0 38.3 41.2 C D D 22.6 41.5 43.8 0.6 3.2 2.6 C D D NO NO NO

15. TS 27.4 10.2 13.7 C B B 27.8 10.6 14.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 C B B NO NO NO

16. TS 15.9 12.1 13.8 B B B 15.9 12.4 14.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 B B B NO NO NO 1 2
3 CSS = Cross-Street Stop
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Deficient operation shown in Bold.

TS = Traffic Signal
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway - I-10 WB Ramps (EW) Resort Parkway - Via Piemonte (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) I-15 NB Ramps (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 WB Ramps (EW)
Cleveland Avenue - Via Asti (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Table 5-4
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Project Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions Intersection Traffic
Control3
Project Opening Year
Without Related Projects
Without Project Conditions
Project Opening Year
Without Related Projects
With Project Conditions
Delay
(Secs)1,2 Level of Service Delay(Secs)1,2 Increase in Delay Level of Service Requires
Improvement?
1 Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01
494

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT

1. TS 33.3 66.6 38.9 C E D

2. TS 14.8 12.7 11.7 B B B

3. TS 7.8 6.9 7.5 A A A

4. CSS 12.3 30.0 18.9 B D C

5. TS 33.1 62.9 54.9 C E D

6. TS 67.8 94.4 113.9 E F F

7. TS 24.8 54.3 54.0 C D D

8. TS 16.4 17.8 16.3 B B B

9. TS 8.0 7.8 4.4 A A A

10. TS 14.2 22.2 21.6 B C C

11. TS 24.6 74.6 25.8 C E C

12. TS 16.7 25.3 28.4 B C C

13. TS 25.7 10.7 8.8 C B A

14. TS 23.4 45.0 48.4 C D D

15. TS 30.1 12.0 15.4 C B B

16. TS 15.8 12.8 14.4 B B B
1 2
3 CSS = Cross-Street Stop
TS = Traffic Signal
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 WB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway - I-10 WB Ramps (EW) Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Deficient operation shown in Bold.

Milliken Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Cleveland Avenue - Via Asti (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Resort Parkway - Via Piemonte (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) I-15 NB Ramps (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Table 5-5
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Project Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions Intersection Traffic
Control3
Delay
(Secs)1,2 Level of Service
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01 495

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT

1. TS 33.3 66.6 38.9 C E D 35.0 71.9 42.8 1.7 5.3 3.9 C E D NO NO NO

2. TS 14.8 12.7 11.7 B B B 15.0 13.3 12.2 0.2 0.6 0.5 B B B NO NO NO

3. TS 7.8 6.9 7.5 A A A 8.2 8.2 8.3 0.4 1.3 0.8 A A A NO NO NO

4. CSS 12.3 30.0 18.9 B D C 12.8 36.0 21.1 0.5 6.0 2.2 B E C NO NO NO

5. TS 33.1 62.9 54.9 C E D 33.4 66.5 57.1 0.3 3.6 2.2 C E E NO NO NO

6. TS 67.8 94.4 113.9 E F F 68.9 97.0 116.1 1.1 2.6 2.2 E F F NO YES YES

7. TS 24.8 54.3 54.0 C D D 25.1 58.4 58.8 0.3 4.1 4.8 C E E NO NO NO

8. TS 16.4 17.8 16.3 B B B 16.4 17.8 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 B B B NO NO NO

9. TS 8.0 7.8 4.4 A A A 10.1 10.5 7.1 2.1 2.7 2.7 B B A NO NO NO

10. TS 14.2 22.2 21.6 B C C 15.0 24.3 23.3 0.8 2.1 1.7 B C C NO NO NO

11. TS 24.6 74.6 25.8 C E C 24.8 75.7 25.9 0.2 1.1 0.1 C E C NO NO NO

12. TS 16.7 25.3 28.4 B C C 16.8 25.7 29.0 0.1 0.4 0.6 B C C NO NO NO

13. TS 25.7 10.7 8.8 C B A 25.8 10.7 8.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 C B A NO NO NO

14. TS 23.4 45.0 48.4 C D D 24.1 48.8 54.3 0.7 3.8 5.9 C D D NO NO NO

15. TS 30.1 12.0 15.4 C B B 30.5 12.7 15.6 0.4 0.7 0.2 C B B NO NO NO

16. TS 15.8 12.8 14.4 B B B 16.1 13.5 14.7 0.3 0.7 0.3 B B B NO NO NO 1 2
3 CSS = Cross-Street Stop
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Deficient operation shown in Bold.

TS = Traffic Signal
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway - I-10 WB Ramps (EW) Resort Parkway - Via Piemonte (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) I-15 NB Ramps (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 WB Ramps (EW)
Cleveland Avenue - Via Asti (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Table 5-6
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Project Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions Intersection Traffic
Control3
Project Opening Year
With Related Projects
Without Project Conditions
Project Opening Year
With Related Projects
With Project Conditions
Delay
(Secs)1,2 Level of Service Delay(Secs)1,2 Increase in Delay Level of Service Requires
Improvement?
Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01
496

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT

1. TS 43.1 98.0 43.7 D F D

2. TS 14.8 13.6 11.8 B B B

3. TS 7.8 7.5 7.5 A A A

4. CSS 12.4 51.9 21.1 B F C

5. TS 43.9 103.9 71.0 D F E

6. TS 118.2 149.3 180.2 F F F

7. TS 58.9 73.5 75.9 E E E

8. TS 20.4 21.6 17.2 C C B

9. TS 7.9 9.3 4.4 A A A

10. TS 15.4 28.4 26.9 B C C

11. TS 39.9 134.7 28.9 D F C

12. TS 18.8 38.2 42.3 B D D

13. TS 56.4 17.3 11.5 E B B

14. TS 31.4 71.4 82.2 C E F

15. TS 64.6 16.7 23.6 E B C

16. TS 26.9 17.3 20.6 C B C
1 2
3 CSS = Cross-Street Stop
TS = Traffic Signal
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 WB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway - I-10 WB Ramps (EW) Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Deficient operation shown in Bold.

Milliken Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Cleveland Avenue - Via Asti (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Resort Parkway - Via Piemonte (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) I-15 NB Ramps (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Table 5-7
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions
Intersection Traffic
Control3
Delay
(Secs)1,2 Level of Service
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01 497

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT

1. TS 43.1 98.0 43.7 D F D 45.0 102.3 46.8 1.9 4.3 3.1 D F D NO YES NO

2. TS 14.8 13.6 11.8 B B B 15.0 14.2 12.3 0.2 0.6 0.5 B B B NO NO NO

3. TS 7.8 7.5 7.5 A A A 8.2 9.6 8.4 0.4 2.1 0.9 A A A NO NO NO

4. CSS 12.4 51.9 21.1 B F C 12.8 73.8 24.3 0.4 21.9 3.2 B F C NO YES NO

5. TS 43.9 103.9 71.0 D F E 44.5 109.7 74.5 0.6 5.8 3.5 D F E NO YES NO

6. TS 118.2 149.3 180.2 F F F 119.0 152.9 184.8 0.8 3.6 4.6 F F F YES YES YES

7. TS 58.9 73.5 75.9 E E E 59.9 78.7 77.9 1.0 5.2 2.0 E E E NO NO NO

8. TS 20.4 21.6 17.2 C C B 20.5 21.7 17.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 C C B NO NO NO

9. TS 7.9 9.3 4.4 A A A 10.2 12.6 6.8 2.3 3.3 2.4 B B A NO NO NO

10. TS 15.4 28.4 26.9 B C C 16.1 31.1 28.8 0.7 2.7 1.9 B C C NO NO NO

11. TS 39.9 134.7 28.9 D F C 41.1 136.5 29.2 1.2 1.8 0.3 D F C NO YES NO

12. TS 18.8 38.2 42.3 B D D 19.0 38.9 43.1 0.2 0.7 0.8 B D D NO NO NO

13. TS 56.4 17.3 11.5 E B B 57.0 17.5 11.6 0.6 0.2 0.1 E B B NO NO NO TS 31.4 71.4 82.2 C E F 32.4 77.1 87.3 1.0 5.7 5.1 C E F NO NO YES TS - - - - - - - - - - - - 27.0 55.6 77.3 -4.4 -15.8 -4.9 C E E NO NO NO

15. TS 64.6 16.7 23.6 E B C 65.6 17.2 24.3 1.0 0.5 0.7 E B C NO NO NO

16. TS 26.9 17.3 20.6 C B C 32.3 18.4 20.9 5.4 1.1 0.3 C B C NO NO NO 1 2
3 CSS = Cross-Street Stop

14. Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Deficient operation shown in Bold.

TS = Traffic Signal
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway - I-10 WB Ramps (EW) Resort Parkway - Via Piemonte (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) I-15 NB Ramps (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Concours Street (NS) / Ontario Center Parkway (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Concours Street (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Milliken Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)
Haven Avenue (NS) / I-10 WB Ramps (EW)
With Improvements
Cleveland Avenue - Via Asti (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
Table 5-8
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions
Intersection Traffic
Control3
Horizon Year (2040)
Without Project Conditions
Horizon Year (2040)
With Project Conditions
Delay
(Secs)1,2 Level of Service Delay(Secs)1,2 Increase in Delay Level of Service Requires
Improvement?
Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01
498
6-1

6.0 CEQA Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
In response to Senate Bill (SB) 743, the California Natural Resource Agency certified and adopted new CEQA Guidelines in December 2018 which now identify Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's transportation impact under CEQA (§ 15064.3).

The City of Ontario has adopted guidelines to provide recommendations in the form of and methodology and thresholds of significance for identifying VMT related impacts. The proposed project is subject to a VMT analysis and will adhere to the recommendations and practices described in the City of Ontario Planning Commission Resolution No. PC20-021 (May 26, 2020).

According to the City’s guidelines, land use projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) and that have the following characteristics are presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary:
 Has a Floor Area Ratio of 0.75 or higher;
 Includes no more parking for residents, customers, or employees than the City Development Code mandates;
 Is consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as determined by the City with input from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) or San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA); and 499
6-2
 If there are existing affordable residential units, replaces those residential units with at least as many similarly affordable units and not with a smaller number of moderate or high-income residential units.

Based on the project site plan, the proposed project encompasses the following Assessor Parcel Numbers:

LOT Assessor Parcel Number
(APN)
LOT A & B APN 021020501
LOT C APN 021020438
LOT D APN 021020439
LOT F APN 021020412-15
LOT G APN 021020420-25
Hence, the VMT analysis examined in this study focuses on the land use components from Lot A, Lot B, Lot C, and Lot D.

After utilizing the SBCTA VMT Screening Tool, all project parcels with the exception of a portion of Parcel F of the proposed project are located within a Transit Priority Area as shown in Exhibit 6-1 and are presumed to maintain the aforementioned characteristics.

The portion of Parcel F which is not within the TPA is not planned to consist of any tripgenerating land uses as those portions of the site will only be used to relocate some of the existing parking capacity on the project site. Hence, those non-TPA areas are not subject to VMT analysis.
500
6-3
Additionally, the proposed project is expected to implement the following design features identified in the Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study, City of Ontario, California, June 4th, 2021. The following project design features are trip reduction measures to reduce the number of auto-based trips and encourage the use of transit, bicycling, and walking:

1. Improve the walkability and design of the project by including pedestrian and bicycling connections within the project site and to adjacent off-site facilities (i.e. sidewalks, crosswalks, foot paths, protected bike lanes, multi-purpose trails, direct parcel-to-parcel connections, wayfinding signage, etc.)

2. Provide traffic calming measures (i.e. marked crosswalks, raised crosswalks, raised intersections, count-own signal timers, curb extensions, speed tables, median islands, tight corner radii, roundabouts or mini-circles, on-street parking, planter strips with street trees, chicanes/chokers, etc.)

3. Provide bicycle racks for the retail and commercial uses and secure bicycle parking areas for the office and residential uses.

It should be also noted that the SBCTA VMT Screening Tool additionally generates various project VMT metrics per traffic analysis zone (TAZ) such as:
 Productions and Attractions (PA) VMT Per Population
o Residential VMT;
 PA VMT Per Worker; and
 PA VMT Per Service Population
o Residential VMT, Worker VMT, and Customer VMT
Based on the outputted VMT metrics for the project TAZ, it appears that the project’s PA VMT Per Population and PA VMT Per Worker is lower than the jurisdictional average.

However, when accounting for the Customer VMT in the PA Per Service Population VMT, the project TAZ’s VMT is greater than the jurisdictional average. As a result, the project is in not within a low VMT generating area.
501
6-4
However, it is still noteworthy that the PA VMT Per Population and PA VMT Per Worker is lower than the jurisdiction average VMT.

SBCTA VMT Screening Tool output is shown in Exhibit 6-2.

In summary, the proposed project is found to have a less than significant VMT impact.

502
503
504
7-1

7.0 Findings & Conclusions

7.1 Purpose of Report, Study Objectives & Proposed Project The purpose of this traffic study is to assess the impacts of the proposed Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development (hereinafter referred to as project) from a traffic and circulation stand point.

The study has been prepared in accordance with the scope of work discussed and approved by City staff prior to initiating the analysis.

The proposed project is located adjacent to the Toyota Arena, north of Concours Street and south of 4th Street, in the City of Ontario.

Proposed Development Plan
Lot Dwelling Units (DU) Retail (SF) Parking Spaces
A 359 25,256 477*
B 98 20,802 130*
C 107 11,047 142*
D 127 14,095 170*
F & G - - - - 1,170
Total 691 71,200 2,089
* Parking structure
505
7-2
Main access for the project is planned via the following:
 One (1) signalized intersection at Cleveland Avenue – Via Asti / 4th Street;  One (1) signalized intersection at Resort Parkway – Via Piemonte / 4th Street;  One (1) right-in/right-out access driveway along 4th Street; and The project is planned to open in 2023 and will be evaluated in one single phase.

7.2 Project Trip Generation:

Based on the ITE trip generation rates:
 The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 6,447 weekday daily trips which include approximately 315 weekday AM peak hour trips, approximately 575 weekday PM peak hour trips.
 The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 6,677 Saturday daily trips which include approximately 624 Saturday peak hour trips.

After accounting for internal trip capture and applicable ITE pass-by trips rates:
 The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 5,691 weekday daily trips which include approximately 300 weekday AM peak hour trips, approximately 458 weekday PM peak hour trips.
 The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 5,813 Saturday daily trips which include approximately 490 Saturday peak hour trips. 506
7-3

7.3.1 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Existing Conditions:

The study intersections are all currently operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Existing Conditions with exception of the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (82.4 secs)

7.3.2 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Existing Plus Project Conditions:

The study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project Conditions with exception of the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (82.7 secs)
Based on agency-established thresholds, the proposed project is required to contribute to improvements at the following study intersection for Existing Plus Project Conditions:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) After review of the existing roadway conditions at this intersection, no feasible intersection improvements can be identified for this study intersection to achieve acceptable level of service (LOS E or better) for Existing Plus Project Conditions. 507
7-4

7.3.3 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions:

The study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year Without Related Projects Without Project Conditions with exception of the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (90.4 secs)

7.3.4 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions:

The study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions with exception of the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (90.8 secs)
Based on agency-established thresholds, the proposed project is required to contribute to improvements at the following study intersection for Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) After review of the existing roadway conditions at this intersection, no feasible intersection improvements can be identified for this study intersection to achieve acceptable level of service (LOS E or better) for Opening Year Without Related Projects With Project Conditions.
508
7-5

7.3.5 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions:

The study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year With Related Projects Without Project Conditions with exception to the following study intersection:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (94.4 secs)
o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (113.9 secs)

7.3.6 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions:

The study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions with exception to the following study intersections:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (97.0 secs)
o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (116.1 secs)
Based on agency-established thresholds, the proposed project is required to contribute to improvements at the following study intersection for Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions:
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) After review of the existing roadway conditions at this intersection, no feasible intersection improvements can be identified for this study intersection to achieve acceptable level of service (LOS E or better) for Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions. 509
7-6

7.3.7 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions:

The study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions with exception to the following study intersection:
 Int #1: Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (98.0 secs)
 Int #4: Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (51.9 secs)
 Int #5: Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (103.9 secs)
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o AM Peak Hour LOS – F (118.2 secs)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (149.3 secs)
o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (180.2 secs)
 Int #11: Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW) o PM Peak Hour LOS – F (134.7 secs)
 Int #14: Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (82.2 secs)
510
7-7

7.3.8 Level of Service Analysis Summary – Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions:

The study intersections are all forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better) during the peak hours for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions with exception to the following study intersections:
 Int #1: Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (102.3 secs)
 Int #4 Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (73.8 secs)
 Int #5: Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (109.7 secs)
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW) o AM Peak Hour LOS – F (119.0 secs)
o PM Peak Hour – LOS F (152.9 secs)
o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (184.8 secs)
 Int #11: Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW) o PM Peak Hour LOS – F (136.5 secs)
 Int #14: Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps (EW) o SAT Peak Hour – LOS F (87.3 secs)
511
7-8
Based on agency-established thresholds, the proposed project is required to contribute to improvements at the following study intersection for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions:
 Int #1: Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #4: Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #5: Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW)  Int #11: Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)  Int #14: Milliken Avenue (NS) / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps (EW) After review of the existing roadway conditions at these study intersections, no feasible intersection improvements can be identified for the following study intersections to achieve acceptable level of service (LOS E or better) for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions.
 Int #1: Haven Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #4: Project Access 3 (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #5: Milliken Avenue (NS) / 4th Street (EW)
 Int #6: I-15 SB Ramps – Ontario Mills Drive (NS) / 4th Street (EW)  Int #11: Haven Avenue (NS) / Inland Empire Boulevard (EW) The following recommended improvements are identified to restore the intersection of Milliken Avenue / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps to acceptable conditions (LOS E for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions:

Intersection Improvement #1 Int 14 – Milliken Avenue / Ontario Mills Parkway – I-10 WB Ramps: Make
a fair-share contribution to widen the
512
7-9
eastbound off-ramp approach from two
left turn lanes, one through lane and one
right turn lane to three left turn lanes, one
through lane, and one right turn lane.

Exhibit 7-1 shows the recommended
improvement.

Table 7-1 shows the project’s fair share traffic contribution to the deficiently-operating study intersections for Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions.

Table 7-2 shows the project’s fair share traffic contribution to the deficiently-operating study intersections for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions.

7.4 CEQA VMT Analysis Summary
The proposed project is found to have a less than significant VMT impact.

513
514

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT
3,526 5,357 5,889 4,177 6,356 7,004 651 999 1,115 75 115 123 11.52% 11.51% 11.03% 1 6. I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) /
4th Street (EW)
Table 7-1
Project Fair-Share Contribution Summary1
Opening Year With Related Projects With Project Conditions Traffic Intersection
Existing Conditions Traffic
Opening Year
With Related Projects
With Project Conditions
Traffic
Growth in Traffic Project Traffic Project Fair-Share
Project Fair-Share Contribution represents the project's traffic contribution at each impacted study area intersection as a percentage of the overall growth in traffic for Horizon Year (2040) With Project ConditionsThis table is for informational purposes only and is not tied to any mitigation.
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01
515

AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT
4,807 5,788 4,513 7,083 8,566 6,723 2,276 2,778 2,210 80 134 148 3.51% 4.82% 6.70% 1,199 2,901 2,094 1,807 4,336 3,169 608 1,435 1,075 60 110 118 9.87% 7.67% 10.98% 4,850 6,586 5,510 7,170 9,785 8,235 2,320 3,199 2,725 105 191 208 4.53% 5.97% 7.63% 3,526 5,357 5,889 5,212 7,919 8,702 1,686 2,562 2,813 75 115 123 4.45% 4.49% 4.37% 5,093 6,430 4,672 7,464 9,436 6,879 2,371 3,006 2,207 45 69 73 1.90% 2.30% 3.31% 3,389 5,211 5,568 5,042 7,751 8,282 1,653 2,540 2,714 105 160 171 6.35% 6.30% 6.30% 1 Table 7-2
Project Fair-Share Contribution Summary1
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions
Intersection
Existing Conditions Traffic Horizon Year (2040)
With Project Conditions Traffic Growth in Traffic Project Traffic Project Fair-Share

1. Haven Avenue (NS) /
4th Street (EW)

4. Project Access 3 (NS) /
4th Street (EW)

5. Milliken Avenue (NS) /
4th Street (EW)

6. I-15 SB Ramps - Ontario Mills Drive (NS) /
4th Street (EW)

11. Haven Avenue (NS) /
Inland Empire Boulevard (EW)

14. Milliken Avenue (NS) /
Ontario Mills Parkway - I-10 WB Ramps (EW)
Project Fair-Share Contribution represents the project's traffic contribution at each impacted study area intersection as a percentage of the overall growth in traffic for Horizon Year (2040) With Project ConditionsThis table is for informational purposes only and is not tied to any mitigation.
j:\rktables\RK16883TB.xlsx
JN:2957-2021-01
516
Appendices
517
Appendix A
Traffic Count Data
518
File Name : ONTHA4TAM
Site Code : 04216488
Start Date : 9/13/2016
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 8 225 9 242 40 88 19 147 32 232 80 344 8 32 35 75 808 07:15 AM 20 237 12 269 45 81 33 159 33 321 84 438 13 36 17 66 932 07:30 AM 19 287 12 318 68 107 40 215 32 298 95 425 14 59 20 93 1051 07:45 AM 23 285 15 323 49 123 25 197 56 361 138 555 19 84 23 126 1201 Total 70 1034 48 1152 202 399 117 718 153 1212 397 1762 54 211 95 360 3992 08:00 AM 21 248 12 281 45 107 30 182 47 365 101 513 24 69 24 117 1093 08:15 AM 14 254 9 277 51 118 20 189 47 316 86 449 24 49 22 95 1010 08:30 AM 20 245 10 275 48 97 22 167 49 315 61 425 11 43 22 76 943 08:45 AM 23 230 13 266 25 74 28 127 41 344 76 461 13 62 26 101 955 Total 78 977 44 1099 169 396 100 665 184 1340 324 1848 72 223 94 389 4001 Grand Total 148 2011 92 2251 371 795 217 1383 337 2552 721 3610 126 434 189 749 7993 Apprch % 6.6 89.3 4.1 26.8 57.5 15.7 9.3 70.7 20 16.8 57.9 25.2 Total % 1.9 25.2 1.2 28.2 4.6 9.9 2.7 17.3 4.2 31.9 9 45.2 1.6 5.4 2.4 9.4 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 19 287 12 318 68 107 40 215 32 298 95 425 14 59 20 93 1051 07:45 AM 23 285 15 323 49 123 25 197 56 361 138 555 19 84 23 126 1201 08:00 AM 21 248 12 281 45 107 30 182 47 365 101 513 24 69 24 117 1093 08:15 AM 14 254 9 277 51 118 20 189 47 316 86 449 24 49 22 95 1010 Total Volume 77 1074 48 1199 213 455 115 783 182 1340 420 1942 81 261 89 431 4355 % App. Total 6.4 89.6 4 27.2 58.1 14.7 9.4 69 21.6 18.8 60.6 20.6 PHF .837 .936 .800 .928 .783 .925 .719 .910 .813 .918 .761 .875 .844 .777 .927 .855 .907 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
519
File Name : ONTHA4TAM
Site Code : 04216488
Start Date : 9/13/2016
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Haven Avenue
Right
48 Thru
1074
Left
77 Out In Total
1536 1199 2735
Right
115
Thru
455
Left
213
Out Total In
758 783 1541
Left
182
Thru
1340
Right
420
Out In Total
1376 1942 3318
Left
81 Thru
261
Right
89 Total Out In
685 431 1116
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 19 287 12 318 68 107 40 215 32 298 95 425 14 59 20 93 +15 mins. 23 285 15 323 49 123 25 197 56 361 138 555 19 84 23 126 +30 mins. 21 248 12 281 45 107 30 182 47 365 101 513 24 69 24 117 +45 mins. 14 254 9 277 51 118 20 189 47 316 86 449 24 49 22 95 Total Volume 77 1074 48 1199 213 455 115 783 182 1340 420 1942 81 261 89 431 % App. Total 6.4 89.6 4 27.2 58.1 14.7 9.4 69 21.6 18.8 60.6 20.6 PHF .837 .936 .800 .928 .783 .925 .719 .910 .813 .918 .761 .875 .844 .777 .927 .855 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
520
File Name : ONTHA4TPM
Site Code : 04216488
Start Date : 9/13/2016
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 32 324 69 425 14 139 28 181 46 338 28 412 83 121 40 244 1262 04:15 PM 32 343 66 441 13 110 21 144 50 302 22 374 83 126 41 250 1209 04:30 PM 32 355 64 451 24 126 19 169 51 300 39 390 65 110 40 215 1225 04:45 PM 23 310 60 393 35 106 26 167 45 318 28 391 80 126 45 251 1202 Total 119 1332 259 1710 86 481 94 661 192 1258 117 1567 311 483 166 960 4898 05:00 PM 39 345 97 481 26 148 23 197 62 341 46 449 73 174 45 292 1419 05:15 PM 35 325 83 443 22 126 19 167 57 342 42 441 77 150 53 280 1331 05:30 PM 30 299 82 411 24 132 21 177 55 329 39 423 87 148 45 280 1291 05:45 PM 28 309 64 401 21 118 9 148 40 313 43 396 65 135 38 238 1183 Total 132 1278 326 1736 93 524 72 689 214 1325 170 1709 302 607 181 1090 5224 Grand Total 251 2610 585 3446 179 1005 166 1350 406 2583 287 3276 613 1090 347 2050 10122 Apprch % 7.3 75.7 17 13.3 74.4 12.3 12.4 78.8 8.8 29.9 53.2 16.9 Total % 2.5 25.8 5.8 34 1.8 9.9 1.6 13.3 4 25.5 2.8 32.4 6.1 10.8 3.4 20.3 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 23 310 60 393 35 106 26 167 45 318 28 391 80 126 45 251 1202 05:00 PM 39 345 97 481 26 148 23 197 62 341 46 449 73 174 45 292 1419 05:15 PM 35 325 83 443 22 126 19 167 57 342 42 441 77 150 53 280 1331 05:30 PM 30 299 82 411 24 132 21 177 55 329 39 423 87 148 45 280 1291 Total Volume 127 1279 322 1728 107 512 89 708 219 1330 155 1704 317 598 188 1103 5243 % App. Total 7.3 74 18.6 15.1 72.3 12.6 12.9 78.1 9.1 28.7 54.2 17 PHF .814 .927 .830 .898 .764 .865 .856 .898 .883 .972 .842 .949 .911 .859 .887 .944 .924 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
521
File Name : ONTHA4TPM
Site Code : 04216488
Start Date : 9/13/2016
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Haven Avenue
Right
322
Thru
1279
Left
127
Out In Total
1736 1728 3464
Right
89 Thru
512
Left
107
Out Total In
880 708 1588
Left
219
Thru
1330
Right
155
Out In Total
1574 1704 3278
Left
317
Thru
598
Right
188
Total Out In
1053 1103 2156
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 04:45 PM
+0 mins. 32 355 64 451 35 106 26 167 62 341 46 449 80 126 45 251 +15 mins. 23 310 60 393 26 148 23 197 57 342 42 441 73 174 45 292 +30 mins. 39 345 97 481 22 126 19 167 55 329 39 423 77 150 53 280 +45 mins. 35 325 83 443 24 132 21 177 40 313 43 396 87 148 45 280 Total Volume 129 1335 304 1768 107 512 89 708 214 1325 170 1709 317 598 188 1103 % App. Total 7.3 75.5 17.2 15.1 72.3 12.6 12.5 77.5 9.9 28.7 54.2 17 PHF .827 .940 .784 .919 .764 .865 .856 .898 .863 .969 .924 .952 .911 .859 .887 .944 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
522
File Name : 02_ONT_Cleveland_4th_AM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Cleveland Avenue / Via Asti
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Cleveland Avenue
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Via Asti
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 0 2 3 0 98 8 106 0 0 0 0 5 66 2 73 182
07:15 AM 1 0 0 1 0 108 8 116 0 0 0 0 4 67 2 73 190
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 122 9 132 2 1 0 3 11 78 5 94 229
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 136 11 147 0 0 0 0 8 100 3 111 258
Total 2 0 2 4 1 464 36 501 2 1 0 3 28 311 12 351 859
08:00 AM 0 0 2 2 0 110 8 118 0 0 0 0 3 74 3 80 200
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 116 12 128 0 0 1 1 5 99 4 108 237
08:30 AM 2 0 2 4 0 106 5 111 2 0 1 3 2 96 2 100 218
08:45 AM 4 0 0 4 0 114 4 118 1 0 1 2 7 97 3 107 231
Total 6 0 4 10 0 446 29 475 3 0 3 6 17 366 12 395 886
Grand Total 8 0 6 14 1 910 65 976 5 1 3 9 45 677 24 746 1745 Apprch % 57.1 0 42.9 0.1 93.2 6.7 55.6 11.1 33.3 6 90.8 3.2 Total % 0.5 0 0.3 0.8 0.1 52.1 3.7 55.9 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 2.6 38.8 1.4 42.8 Cleveland Avenue
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Via Asti
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 122 9 132 2 1 0 3 11 78 5 94 229
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 136 11 147 0 0 0 0 8 100 3 111 258
08:00 AM 0 0 2 2 0 110 8 118 0 0 0 0 3 74 3 80 200
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 116 12 128 0 0 1 1 5 99 4 108 237
Total Volume 0 0 2 2 1 484 40 525 2 1 1 4 27 351 15 393 924 % App. Total 0 0 100 0.2 92.2 7.6 50 25 25 6.9 89.3 3.8 PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .250 .890 .833 .893 .250 .250 .250 .333 .614 .878 .750 .885 .895 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
523
File Name : 02_ONT_Cleveland_4th_AM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Cleveland Avenue / Via Asti
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Cleveland Avenue
4th Street
4th Street
Via Asti
Right
2 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
68 2 70
Right
40 Thru
484
Left
1 Out Total In
352 525 877
Left
2 Thru
1 Right
1 Out In Total
16 4 20
Left
27 Thru
351
Right
15 Total Out In
488 393 881
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
08:00 AM 07:30 AM 08:00 AM 07:45 AM
+0 mins. 0 0 2 2 1 122 9 132 0 0 0 0 8 100 3 111
+15 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 136 11 147 0 0 1 1 3 74 3 80
+30 mins. 2 0 2 4 0 110 8 118 2 0 1 3 5 99 4 108
+45 mins. 4 0 0 4 0 116 12 128 1 0 1 2 2 96 2 100
Total Volume 6 0 4 10 1 484 40 525 3 0 3 6 18 369 12 399 % App. Total 60 0 40 0.2 92.2 7.6 50 0 50 4.5 92.5 3
PHF .375 .000 .500 .625 .250 .890 .833 .893 .375 .000 .750 .500 .563 .923 .750 .899 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
524
File Name : 02_ONT_Cleveland_4th_PM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Cleveland Avenue / Via Asti
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Cleveland Avenue
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Via Asti
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 6 1 3 10 0 199 0 199 1 0 0 1 1 276 1 278 488
04:15 PM 6 0 1 7 0 190 1 191 1 0 0 1 3 290 3 296 495
04:30 PM 10 0 2 12 1 190 1 192 2 0 3 5 1 330 1 332 541
04:45 PM 5 0 1 6 0 206 2 208 1 0 3 4 0 286 0 286 504
Total 27 1 7 35 1 785 4 790 5 0 6 11 5 1182 5 1192 2028 05:00 PM 22 0 3 25 0 192 2 194 2 0 2 4 2 326 1 329 552
05:15 PM 5 0 2 7 0 189 1 190 3 0 0 3 0 292 1 293 493
05:30 PM 1 0 1 2 0 181 2 183 2 0 2 4 0 333 0 333 522
05:45 PM 5 0 3 8 1 208 5 214 3 0 3 6 1 326 2 329 557
Total 33 0 9 42 1 770 10 781 10 0 7 17 3 1277 4 1284 2124 Grand Total 60 1 16 77 2 1555 14 1571 15 0 13 28 8 2459 9 2476 4152 Apprch % 77.9 1.3 20.8 0.1 99 0.9 53.6 0 46.4 0.3 99.3 0.4 Total % 1.4 0 0.4 1.9 0 37.5 0.3 37.8 0.4 0 0.3 0.7 0.2 59.2 0.2 59.6 Cleveland Avenue
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Via Asti
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 22 0 3 25 0 192 2 194 2 0 2 4 2 326 1 329 552
05:15 PM 5 0 2 7 0 189 1 190 3 0 0 3 0 292 1 293 493
05:30 PM 1 0 1 2 0 181 2 183 2 0 2 4 0 333 0 333 522
05:45 PM 5 0 3 8 1 208 5 214 3 0 3 6 1 326 2 329 557
Total Volume 33 0 9 42 1 770 10 781 10 0 7 17 3 1277 4 1284 2124 % App. Total 78.6 0 21.4 0.1 98.6 1.3 58.8 0 41.2 0.2 99.5 0.3 PHF .375 .000 .750 .420 .250 .925 .500 .912 .833 .000 .583 .708 .375 .959 .500 .964 .953 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
525
File Name : 02_ONT_Cleveland_4th_PM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Cleveland Avenue / Via Asti
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Cleveland Avenue
4th Street
4th Street
Via Asti
Right
9 Thru
0 Left
33 Out In Total
13 42 55
Right
10 Thru
770
Left
1 Out Total In
1317 781 2098
Left
10 Thru
0 Right
7 Out In Total
5 17 22
Left
3 1277
Thru Right
4 Total Out In
789 1284 2073
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:15 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 6 0 1 7 0 199 0 199 2 0 2 4 2 326 1 329
+15 mins. 10 0 2 12 0 190 1 191 3 0 0 3 0 292 1 293
+30 mins. 5 0 1 6 1 190 1 192 2 0 2 4 0 333 0 333
+45 mins. 22 0 3 25 0 206 2 208 3 0 3 6 1 326 2 329
Total Volume 43 0 7 50 1 785 4 790 10 0 7 17 3 1277 4 1284 % App. Total 86 0 14 0.1 99.4 0.5 58.8 0 41.2 0.2 99.5 0.3 PHF .489 .000 .583 .500 .250 .953 .500 .950 .833 .000 .583 .708 .375 .959 .500 .964 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
526
File Name : 03_ONT_Resort_4th_AM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Resort Pkwy / Via Piemonte
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Resort Parkway
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Via Piemonte
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 4 1 5 10 1 104 10 115 0 0 2 2 5 59 3 67 194
07:15 AM 7 1 3 11 2 105 13 120 6 1 3 10 7 52 0 59 200
07:30 AM 7 0 2 9 3 133 6 142 0 0 1 1 1 81 0 82 234
07:45 AM 6 0 3 9 4 130 2 136 4 1 0 5 3 99 1 103 253
Total 24 2 13 39 10 472 31 513 10 2 6 18 16 291 4 311 881 08:00 AM 4 1 4 9 1 107 3 111 2 0 6 8 3 72 1 76 204
08:15 AM 7 1 3 11 3 128 3 134 0 1 1 2 3 96 1 100 247
08:30 AM 3 0 1 4 5 112 7 124 0 0 0 0 2 96 0 98 226
08:45 AM 7 0 1 8 5 121 5 131 0 0 0 0 1 100 3 104 243
Total 21 2 9 32 14 468 18 500 2 1 7 10 9 364 5 378 920
Grand Total 45 4 22 71 24 940 49 1013 12 3 13 28 25 655 9 689 1801 Apprch % 63.4 5.6 31 2.4 92.8 4.8 42.9 10.7 46.4 3.6 95.1 1.3 Total % 2.5 0.2 1.2 3.9 1.3 52.2 2.7 56.2 0.7 0.2 0.7 1.6 1.4 36.4 0.5 38.3 Resort Parkway
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Via Piemonte
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 7 0 2 9 3 133 6 142 0 0 1 1 1 81 0 82 234
07:45 AM 6 0 3 9 4 130 2 136 4 1 0 5 3 99 1 103 253
08:00 AM 4 1 4 9 1 107 3 111 2 0 6 8 3 72 1 76 204
08:15 AM 7 1 3 11 3 128 3 134 0 1 1 2 3 96 1 100 247
Total Volume 24 2 12 38 11 498 14 523 6 2 8 16 10 348 3 361 938 % App. Total 63.2 5.3 31.6 2.1 95.2 2.7 37.5 12.5 50 2.8 96.4 0.8 PHF .857 .500 .750 .864 .688 .936 .583 .921 .375 .500 .333 .500 .833 .879 .750 .876 .927 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
527
File Name : 03_ONT_Resort_4th_AM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Resort Pkwy / Via Piemonte
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Resort Parkway
4th Street
4th Street
Via Piemonte
Right
12 Thru
2 Left
24 Out In Total
26 38 64
Right
14 Thru
498
Left
11 Out Total In
380 523 903
Left
6 Thru
2 Right
8 Out In Total
16 16 32
Left
10 Thru
348
Right
3 Total Out In
516 361 877
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:15 AM 08:00 AM
+0 mins. 4 1 5 10 3 133 6 142 6 1 3 10 3 72 1 76
+15 mins. 7 1 3 11 4 130 2 136 0 0 1 1 3 96 1 100
+30 mins. 7 0 2 9 1 107 3 111 4 1 0 5 2 96 0 98
+45 mins. 6 0 3 9 3 128 3 134 2 0 6 8 1 100 3 104
Total Volume 24 2 13 39 11 498 14 523 12 2 10 24 9 364 5 378 % App. Total 61.5 5.1 33.3 2.1 95.2 2.7 50 8.3 41.7 2.4 96.3 1.3 PHF .857 .500 .650 .886 .688 .936 .583 .921 .500 .500 .417 .600 .750 .910 .417 .909 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
528
File Name : 03_ONT_Resort_4th_PM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Resort Pkwy / Via Piemonte
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Resort Parkway
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Via Piemonte
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 9 0 6 15 0 184 5 189 5 0 6 11 1 271 1 273 488
04:15 PM 5 0 0 5 1 199 8 208 0 0 3 3 4 289 1 294 510
04:30 PM 12 1 5 18 2 190 6 198 1 0 1 2 5 352 0 357 575
04:45 PM 6 0 6 12 0 203 7 210 4 0 8 12 10 287 3 300 534 Total 32 1 17 50 3 776 26 805 10 0 18 28 20 1199 5 1224 2107 05:00 PM 7 0 3 10 1 178 6 185 3 0 2 5 2 361 2 365 565
05:15 PM 8 0 4 12 1 184 9 194 1 1 1 3 2 289 0 291 500
05:30 PM 5 0 2 7 2 174 8 184 3 0 2 5 7 324 1 332 528
05:45 PM 12 0 4 16 1 204 9 214 2 0 3 5 3 335 4 342 577
Total 32 0 13 45 5 740 32 777 9 1 8 18 14 1309 7 1330 2170 Grand Total 64 1 30 95 8 1516 58 1582 19 1 26 46 34 2508 12 2554 4277 Apprch % 67.4 1.1 31.6 0.5 95.8 3.7 41.3 2.2 56.5 1.3 98.2 0.5 Total % 1.5 0 0.7 2.2 0.2 35.4 1.4 37 0.4 0 0.6 1.1 0.8 58.6 0.3 59.7 Resort Parkway
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Via Piemonte
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 5 0 0 5 1 199 8 208 0 0 3 3 4 289 1 294 510
04:30 PM 12 1 5 18 2 190 6 198 1 0 1 2 5 352 0 357 575
04:45 PM 6 0 6 12 0 203 7 210 4 0 8 12 10 287 3 300 534 05:00 PM 7 0 3 10 1 178 6 185 3 0 2 5 2 361 2 365 565
Total Volume 30 1 14 45 4 770 27 801 8 0 14 22 21 1289 6 1316 2184 % App. Total 66.7 2.2 31.1 0.5 96.1 3.4 36.4 0 63.6 1.6 97.9 0.5 PHF .625 .250 .583 .625 .500 .948 .844 .954 .500 .000 .438 .458 .525 .893 .500 .901 .950 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
529
File Name : 03_ONT_Resort_4th_PM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Resort Pkwy / Via Piemonte
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Resort Parkway
4th Street
4th Street
Via Piemonte
Right
14 Thru
1 Left
30 Out In Total
48 45 93
Right
27 Thru
770
Left
4 Out Total In
1333 801 2134
Left
8 Thru
0 Right
14 Out In Total
11 22 33
Left
21 1289
Thru Right
6 Total Out In
792 1316 2108
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 12 1 5 18 0 184 5 189 5 0 6 11 2 361 2 365
+15 mins. 6 0 6 12 1 199 8 208 0 0 3 3 2 289 0 291
+30 mins. 7 0 3 10 2 190 6 198 1 0 1 2 7 324 1 332
+45 mins. 8 0 4 12 0 203 7 210 4 0 8 12 3 335 4 342
Total Volume 33 1 18 52 3 776 26 805 10 0 18 28 14 1309 7 1330 % App. Total 63.5 1.9 34.6 0.4 96.4 3.2 35.7 0 64.3 1.1 98.4 0.5 PHF .688 .250 .750 .722 .375 .956 .813 .958 .500 .000 .563 .583 .500 .907 .438 .911 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
530
File Name : 04_ONT_Project Access_4th_AM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Project Access 3
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
4th Street
Westbound
Via Piemonte
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 108 108 0 0 0 63 0 63 171
07:15 AM 0 115 115 0 0 0 65 0 65 180
07:30 AM 0 131 131 0 0 0 88 0 88 219
07:45 AM 0 135 135 0 0 0 101 5 106 241
Total 0 489 489 0 0 0 317 5 322 811
08:00 AM 0 109 109 0 0 0 83 2 85 194
08:15 AM 0 128 128 0 0 0 94 4 98 226
08:30 AM 0 121 121 0 2 2 97 4 101 224
08:45 AM 0 128 128 0 0 0 98 7 105 233
Total 0 486 486 0 2 2 372 17 389 877
Grand Total 0 975 975 0 2 2 689 22 711 1688
Apprch % 0 100 0 100 96.9 3.1
Total % 0 57.8 57.8 0 0.1 0.1 40.8 1.3 42.1
4th Street
Westbound
Via Piemonte
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM 0 135 135 0 0 0 101 5 106 241
08:00 AM 0 109 109 0 0 0 83 2 85 194
08:15 AM 0 128 128 0 0 0 94 4 98 226
08:30 AM 0 121 121 0 2 2 97 4 101 224
Total Volume 0 493 493 0 2 2 375 15 390 885
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 96.2 3.8
PHF .000 .913 .913 .000 .250 .250 .928 .750 .920 .918
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
531
File Name : 04_ONT_Project Access_4th_AM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Project Access 3
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
4th Street
4th Street
Via Piemonte
Thru
493
Left
0 Out Total In
377 493 870
Left
0 Right
2 Out In Total
15 2 17
Thru
375
Right
15 Total Out In
493 390 883
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:45 AM 07:45 AM
+0 mins. 0 131 131 0 0 0 101 5 106
+15 mins. 0 135 135 0 0 0 83 2 85
+30 mins. 0 109 109 0 0 0 94 4 98
+45 mins. 0 128 128 0 2 2 97 4 101
Total Volume 0 503 503 0 2 2 375 15 390
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 96.2 3.8
PHF .000 .931 .931 .000 .250 .250 .928 .750 .920
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
532
File Name : 04_ONT_Project Access_4th_PM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Project Access 3
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
4th Street
Westbound
Via Piemonte
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 185 185 0 1 1 271 6 277 463
04:15 PM 0 201 201 0 7 7 283 19 302 510
04:30 PM 0 197 197 0 7 7 347 6 353 557
04:45 PM 0 203 203 0 3 3 303 8 311 517
Total 0 786 786 0 18 18 1204 39 1243 2047
05:00 PM 0 181 181 0 2 2 361 12 373 556
05:15 PM 0 190 190 0 9 9 294 16 310 509
05:30 PM 0 179 179 0 3 3 293 19 312 494
05:45 PM 0 207 207 0 3 3 331 9 340 550
Total 0 757 757 0 17 17 1279 56 1335 2109
Grand Total 0 1543 1543 0 35 35 2483 95 2578 4156
Apprch % 0 100 0 100 96.3 3.7
Total % 0 37.1 37.1 0 0.8 0.8 59.7 2.3 62
4th Street
Westbound
Via Piemonte
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 0 201 201 0 7 7 283 19 302 510
04:30 PM 0 197 197 0 7 7 347 6 353 557
04:45 PM 0 203 203 0 3 3 303 8 311 517
05:00 PM 0 181 181 0 2 2 361 12 373 556
Total Volume 0 782 782 0 19 19 1294 45 1339 2140
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 96.6 3.4
PHF .000 .963 .963 .000 .679 .679 .896 .592 .897 .961
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
533
File Name : 04_ONT_Project Access_4th_PM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Project Access 3
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
4th Street
4th Street
Via Piemonte
Thru
782
Left
0 Out Total In
1313 782 2095
Left
0 Right
19 Out In Total
45 19 64
1294
Thru Right
45 Total Out In
782 1339 2121
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 0 185 185 0 7 7 347 6 353
+15 mins. 0 201 201 0 3 3 303 8 311
+30 mins. 0 197 197 0 2 2 361 12 373
+45 mins. 0 203 203 0 9 9 294 16 310
Total Volume 0 786 786 0 21 21 1305 42 1347
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 96.9 3.1
PHF .000 .968 .968 .000 .583 .583 .904 .656 .903
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
534
File Name : RNCMI4TAM
Site Code : 04216253
Start Date : 7/6/2016
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Milliken Avenue
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Milliken Avenue
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Milliken Avenue
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 36 120 16 172 62 125 57 244 33 93 20 146 17 40 13 70 632 07:15 AM 36 128 15 179 76 152 71 299 28 103 12 143 20 40 19 79 700 07:30 AM 35 170 9 214 90 238 73 401 56 143 16 215 22 46 25 93 923 07:45 AM 57 179 14 250 84 278 87 449 53 197 31 281 27 65 25 117 1097 Total 164 597 54 815 312 793 288 1393 170 536 79 785 86 191 82 359 3352 08:00 AM 29 131 9 169 77 176 77 330 31 149 30 210 22 41 19 82 791 08:15 AM 32 131 17 180 88 207 66 361 39 122 25 186 29 49 26 104 831 08:30 AM 37 126 11 174 103 231 61 395 35 110 35 180 30 45 24 99 848 08:45 AM 47 123 22 192 77 226 82 385 45 128 30 203 28 50 24 102 882 Total 145 511 59 715 345 840 286 1471 150 509 120 779 109 185 93 387 3352 Grand Total 309 1108 113 1530 657 1633 574 2864 320 1045 199 1564 195 376 175 746 6704 Apprch % 20.2 72.4 7.4 22.9 57 20 20.5 66.8 12.7 26.1 50.4 23.5 Total % 4.6 16.5 1.7 22.8 9.8 24.4 8.6 42.7 4.8 15.6 3 23.3 2.9 5.6 2.6 11.1 Milliken Avenue
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Milliken Avenue
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 35 170 9 214 90 238 73 401 56 143 16 215 22 46 25 93 923 07:45 AM 57 179 14 250 84 278 87 449 53 197 31 281 27 65 25 117 1097 08:00 AM 29 131 9 169 77 176 77 330 31 149 30 210 22 41 19 82 791 08:15 AM 32 131 17 180 88 207 66 361 39 122 25 186 29 49 26 104 831 Total Volume 153 611 49 813 339 899 303 1541 179 611 102 892 100 201 95 396 3642 % App. Total 18.8 75.2 6 22 58.3 19.7 20.1 68.5 11.4 25.3 50.8 24 PHF .671 .853 .721 .813 .942 .808 .871 .858 .799 .775 .823 .794 .862 .773 .913 .846 .830 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
535
File Name : RNCMI4TAM
Site Code : 04216253
Start Date : 7/6/2016
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Milliken Avenue
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Milliken Avenue
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Milliken Avenue
Right
49 Thru
611
Left
153
Out In Total
1014 813 1827
Right
303
Thru
899
Left
339
Out Total In
456 1541 1997
Left
179
Thru
611
Right
102
Out In Total
1045 892 1937
Left
100
Thru
201
Right
95 Total Out In
1127 396 1523
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM
+0 mins. 36 120 16 172 90 238 73 401 56 143 16 215 27 65 25 117 +15 mins. 36 128 15 179 84 278 87 449 53 197 31 281 22 41 19 82 +30 mins. 35 170 9 214 77 176 77 330 31 149 30 210 29 49 26 104 +45 mins. 57 179 14 250 88 207 66 361 39 122 25 186 30 45 24 99 Total Volume 164 597 54 815 339 899 303 1541 179 611 102 892 108 200 94 402 % App. Total 20.1 73.3 6.6 22 58.3 19.7 20.1 68.5 11.4 26.9 49.8 23.4 PHF .719 .834 .844 .815 .942 .808 .871 .858 .799 .775 .823 .794 .900 .769 .904 .859 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
536
File Name : RNCMI4TPM
Site Code : 04216253
Start Date : 7/6/2016
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Milliken Avenue
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Milliken Avenue
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Milliken Avenue
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 87 176 18 281 82 127 64 273 58 238 77 373 89 150 95 334 1261 04:15 PM 95 140 23 258 75 124 80 279 68 229 76 373 120 250 72 442 1352 04:30 PM 103 202 42 347 83 114 61 258 45 263 77 385 77 194 58 329 1319 04:45 PM 108 202 28 338 71 134 69 274 52 279 78 409 75 215 48 338 1359 Total 393 720 111 1224 311 499 274 1084 223 1009 308 1540 361 809 273 1443 5291 05:00 PM 133 197 38 368 93 110 58 261 80 309 82 471 83 271 64 418 1518 05:15 PM 120 176 27 323 81 129 69 279 75 374 93 542 102 295 86 483 1627 05:30 PM 90 166 30 286 84 127 68 279 78 311 99 488 113 246 49 408 1461 05:45 PM 103 156 27 286 80 115 52 247 58 275 74 407 96 174 51 321 1261 Total 446 695 122 1263 338 481 247 1066 291 1269 348 1908 394 986 250 1630 5867 Grand Total 839 1415 233 2487 649 980 521 2150 514 2278 656 3448 755 1795 523 3073 11158 Apprch % 33.7 56.9 9.4 30.2 45.6 24.2 14.9 66.1 19 24.6 58.4 17 Total % 7.5 12.7 2.1 22.3 5.8 8.8 4.7 19.3 4.6 20.4 5.9 30.9 6.8 16.1 4.7 27.5 Milliken Avenue
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Milliken Avenue
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 108 202 28 338 71 134 69 274 52 279 78 409 75 215 48 338 1359 05:00 PM 133 197 38 368 93 110 58 261 80 309 82 471 83 271 64 418 1518 05:15 PM 120 176 27 323 81 129 69 279 75 374 93 542 102 295 86 483 1627 05:30 PM 90 166 30 286 84 127 68 279 78 311 99 488 113 246 49 408 1461 Total Volume 451 741 123 1315 329 500 264 1093 285 1273 352 1910 373 1027 247 1647 5965 % App. Total 34.3 56.3 9.4 30.1 45.7 24.2 14.9 66.6 18.4 22.6 62.4 15 PHF .848 .917 .809 .893 .884 .933 .957 .979 .891 .851 .889 .881 .825 .870 .718 .852 .917 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
537
File Name : RNCMI4TPM
Site Code : 04216253
Start Date : 7/6/2016
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Milliken Avenue
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Milliken Avenue
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Milliken Avenue
Right
123
Thru
741
Left
451
Out In Total
1910 1315 3225
Right
264
Thru
500
Left
329
Out Total In
1830 1093 2923
Left
285
Thru
1273
Right
352
Out In Total
1317 1910 3227
Left
373 1027
Thru Right
247
Total Out In
908 1647 2555
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 04:45 PM
+0 mins. 103 202 42 347 71 134 69 274 52 279 78 409 75 215 48 338 +15 mins. 108 202 28 338 93 110 58 261 80 309 82 471 83 271 64 418 +30 mins. 133 197 38 368 81 129 69 279 75 374 93 542 102 295 86 483 +45 mins. 120 176 27 323 84 127 68 279 78 311 99 488 113 246 49 408 Total Volume 464 777 135 1376 329 500 264 1093 285 1273 352 1910 373 1027 247 1647 % App. Total 33.7 56.5 9.8 30.1 45.7 24.2 14.9 66.6 18.4 22.6 62.4 15 PHF .872 .962 .804 .935 .884 .933 .957 .979 .891 .851 .889 .881 .825 .870 .718 .852 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
538
File Name : ONT_Milliken_4th_AM
Site Code : 10521447
Start Date : 8/31/2021
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Milliken Avenue
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Milliken Avenue
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Milliken Avenue
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 31 90 5 126 94 172 46 312 22 101 28 151 20 51 20 91 680 07:15 AM 38 111 11 160 80 158 57 295 30 113 21 164 21 38 20 79 698 07:30 AM 35 127 17 179 84 245 79 408 28 156 32 216 16 69 16 101 904 07:45 AM 38 164 15 217 99 190 72 361 40 194 30 264 37 67 18 122 964 Total 142 492 48 682 357 765 254 1376 120 564 111 795 94 225 74 393 3246 08:00 AM 31 121 15 167 80 217 74 371 32 156 24 212 32 60 16 108 858 08:15 AM 36 167 20 223 64 183 53 300 41 156 17 214 19 73 22 114 851 08:30 AM 37 165 17 219 82 196 52 330 28 114 20 162 20 58 18 96 807 08:45 AM 49 133 19 201 84 192 71 347 27 148 23 198 33 78 21 132 878 Total 153 586 71 810 310 788 250 1348 128 574 84 786 104 269 77 450 3394 Grand Total 295 1078 119 1492 667 1553 504 2724 248 1138 195 1581 198 494 151 843 6640 Apprch % 19.8 72.3 8 24.5 57 18.5 15.7 72 12.3 23.5 58.6 17.9 Total % 4.4 16.2 1.8 22.5 10 23.4 7.6 41 3.7 17.1 2.9 23.8 3 7.4 2.3 12.7 Milliken Avenue
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Milliken Avenue
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 35 127 17 179 84 245 79 408 28 156 32 216 16 69 16 101 904 07:45 AM 38 164 15 217 99 190 72 361 40 194 30 264 37 67 18 122 964 08:00 AM 31 121 15 167 80 217 74 371 32 156 24 212 32 60 16 108 858 08:15 AM 36 167 20 223 64 183 53 300 41 156 17 214 19 73 22 114 851 Total Volume 140 579 67 786 327 835 278 1440 141 662 103 906 104 269 72 445 3577 % App. Total 17.8 73.7 8.5 22.7 58 19.3 15.6 73.1 11.4 23.4 60.4 16.2 PHF .921 .867 .838 .881 .826 .852 .880 .882 .860 .853 .805 .858 .703 .921 .818 .912 .928 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
539
File Name : ONT_Milliken_4th_AM
Site Code : 10521447
Start Date : 8/31/2021
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Milliken Avenue
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Milliken Avenue
4th Street
4th Street
Milliken Avenue
Right
67 Thru
579
Left
140
Out In Total
1044 786 1830
Right
278
Thru
835
Left
327
Out Total In
512 1440 1952
Left
141
Thru
662
Right
103
Out In Total
978 906 1884
Left
104
Thru
269
Right
72 Total Out In
1043 445 1488
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:45 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 08:00 AM
+0 mins. 38 164 15 217 84 245 79 408 28 156 32 216 32 60 16 108 +15 mins. 31 121 15 167 99 190 72 361 40 194 30 264 19 73 22 114 +30 mins. 36 167 20 223 80 217 74 371 32 156 24 212 20 58 18 96 +45 mins. 37 165 17 219 64 183 53 300 41 156 17 214 33 78 21 132 Total Volume 142 617 67 826 327 835 278 1440 141 662 103 906 104 269 77 450 % App. Total 17.2 74.7 8.1 22.7 58 19.3 15.6 73.1 11.4 23.1 59.8 17.1 PHF .934 .924 .838 .926 .826 .852 .880 .882 .860 .853 .805 .858 .788 .862 .875 .852 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
540
File Name : ONT_Milliken_4th_PM
Site Code : 10521447
Start Date : 8/31/2021
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Milliken Avenue
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Milliken Avenue
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Milliken Avenue
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 71 125 24 220 92 114 44 250 45 247 77 369 71 187 36 294 1133 04:15 PM 88 116 22 226 72 137 44 253 52 230 66 348 58 207 37 302 1129 04:30 PM 83 167 23 273 77 122 46 245 45 256 68 369 60 192 45 297 1184 04:45 PM 86 138 19 243 84 174 56 314 63 240 47 350 79 163 30 272 1179 Total 328 546 88 962 325 547 190 1062 205 973 258 1436 268 749 148 1165 4625 05:00 PM 81 206 22 309 52 127 38 217 46 296 77 419 84 188 43 315 1260 05:15 PM 60 135 35 230 71 159 46 276 45 244 67 356 85 215 41 341 1203 05:30 PM 79 173 26 278 54 140 55 249 60 275 68 403 61 194 32 287 1217 05:45 PM 89 134 22 245 61 121 47 229 59 236 64 359 65 186 41 292 1125 Total 309 648 105 1062 238 547 186 971 210 1051 276 1537 295 783 157 1235 4805 Grand Total 637 1194 193 2024 563 1094 376 2033 415 2024 534 2973 563 1532 305 2400 9430 Apprch % 31.5 59 9.5 27.7 53.8 18.5 14 68.1 18 23.5 63.8 12.7 Total % 6.8 12.7 2 21.5 6 11.6 4 21.6 4.4 21.5 5.7 31.5 6 16.2 3.2 25.5 Milliken Avenue
Southbound
4th Street
Westbound
Milliken Avenue
Northbound
4th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 86 138 19 243 84 174 56 314 63 240 47 350 79 163 30 272 1179 05:00 PM 81 206 22 309 52 127 38 217 46 296 77 419 84 188 43 315 1260 05:15 PM 60 135 35 230 71 159 46 276 45 244 67 356 85 215 41 341 1203 05:30 PM 79 173 26 278 54 140 55 249 60 275 68 403 61 194 32 287 1217 Total Volume 306 652 102 1060 261 600 195 1056 214 1055 259 1528 309 760 146 1215 4859 % App. Total 28.9 61.5 9.6 24.7 56.8 18.5 14 69 17 25.4 62.6 12 PHF .890 .791 .729 .858 .777 .862 .871 .841 .849 .891 .841 .912 .909 .884 .849 .891 .964 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
541
File Name : ONT_Milliken_4th_PM
Site Code : 10521447
Start Date : 8/31/2021
Page No : 2
City of Ontario
N/S: Milliken Avenue
E/W: 4th Street
Weather: Clear
Milliken Avenue
4th Street
4th Street
Milliken Avenue
Right
102
Thru
652
Left
306
Out In Total
1559 1060 2619
Right
195
Thru
600
Left
261
Out Total In
1325 1056 2381
Left
214
Thru
1055
Right
259
Out In Total
1059 1528 2587
Left
309
Thru
760
Right
146
Total Out In
916 1215 2131
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
05:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 81 206 22 309 92 114 44 250 46 296 77 419 84 188 43 315 +15 mins. 60 135 35 230 72 137 44 253 45 244 67 356 85 215 41 341 +30 mins. 79 173 26 278 77 122 46 245 60 275 68 403 61 194 32 287 +45 mins. 89 134 22 245 84 174 56 314 59 236 64 359 65 186 41 292 Total Volume 309 648 105 1062 325 547 190 1062 210 1051 276 1537 295 783 157 1235 % App. Total 29.1 61 9.9 30.6 51.5 17.9 13.7 68.4 18 23.9 63.4 12.7 PHF .868 .786 .750 .859 .883 .786 .848 .846 .875 .888 .896 .917 .868 .910 .913 .905 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]
542
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle Trucks I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 46 27 153 226 18 161 27 206 16 10 12 38 69 67 8 144 614 07:15 AM 38 44 150 232 28 197 21 246 21 8 15 44 74 75 9 158 680 07:30 AM 25 56 198 279 16 266 33 315 15 14 9 38 68 64 13 145 777 07:45 AM 39 63 220 322 27 290 31 348 17 16 20 53 59 81 19 159 882 Total 148 190 721 1059 89 914 112 1115 69 48 56 173 270 287 49 606 2953 08:00 AM 33 43 141 217 35 264 22 321 14 15 18 47 56 70 10 136 721 08:15 AM 26 24 165 215 14 262 24 300 14 14 18 46 56 64 8 128 689 08:30 AM 27 36 129 192 24 233 36 293 22 5 23 50 50 65 27 142 677 08:45 AM 28 40 146 214 40 214 35 289 13 10 12 35 47 69 5 121 659 Total 114 143 581 838 113 973 117 1203 63 44 71 178 209 268 50 527 2746 Grand Total 262 333 1302 1897 202 1887 229 2318 132 92 127 351 479 555 99 1133 5699 Apprch % 13.8 17.6 68.6 8.7 81.4 9.9 37.6 26.2 36.2 42.3 49 8.7 Total % 4.6 5.8 22.8 33.3 3.5 33.1 4 40.7 2.3 1.6 2.2 6.2 8.4 9.7 1.7 19.9 Passenger Vehicles 234 330 1285 1849 198 1763 168 2129 128 87 120 335 400 497 94 991 5304 % Passenger Vehicles 89.3 99.1 98.7 97.5 98 93.4 73.4 91.8 97 94.6 94.5 95.4 83.5 89.5 94.9 87.5 93.1 Large 2 Axle Vehicles 2 3 4 9 3 40 18 61 3 3 5 11 36 27 4 67 148 % Large 2 Axle Vehicles 0.8 0.9 0.3 0.5 1.5 2.1 7.9 2.6 2.3 3.3 3.9 3.1 7.5 4.9 4 5.9 2.6 3 Axle Vehicles 1 0 1 2 1 15 4 20 1 1 0 2 2 5 0 7 31
% 3 Axle Vehicles 0.4 0 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.8 1.7 0.9 0.8 1.1 0 0.6 0.4 0.9 0 0.6 0.5 4+ Axle Trucks 25 0 12 37 0 69 39 108 0 1 2 3 41 26 1 68 216 % 4+ Axle Trucks 9.5 0 0.9 2 0 3.7 17 4.7 0 1.1 1.6 0.9 8.6 4.7 1 6 3.8 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 25 56 198 279 16 266 33 315 15 14 9 38 68 64 13 145 777 07:45 AM 39 63 220 322 27 290 31 348 17 16 20 53 59 81 19 159 882 08:00 AM 33 43 141 217 35 264 22 321 14 15 18 47 56 70 10 136 721 08:15 AM 26 24 165 215 14 262 24 300 14 14 18 46 56 64 8 128 689 Total Volume 123 186 724 1033 92 1082 110 1284 60 59 65 184 239 279 50 568 3069 % App. Total 11.9 18 70.1 7.2 84.3 8.6 32.6 32.1 35.3 42.1 49.1 8.8 PHF .788 .738 .823 .802 .657 .933 .833 .922 .882 .922 .813 .868 .879 .861 .658 .893 .870 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
543
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
724
Thru
186
Left
123
Out In Total
408 1033 1441
Right
110
Thru
1082
Left
92 Out Total In
467 1284 1751
Left
60 Thru
59 Right
65 Out In Total
328 184 512
Left
239
Thru
279
Right
50 Total Out In
1866 568 2434
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Passenger Vehicles
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
3 Axle Vehicles
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 07:00 AM
+0 mins. 46 27 153 226 16 266 33 315 17 16 20 53 69 67 8 144 +15 mins. 38 44 150 232 27 290 31 348 14 15 18 47 74 75 9 158 +30 mins. 25 56 198 279 35 264 22 321 14 14 18 46 68 64 13 145 +45 mins. 39 63 220 322 14 262 24 300 22 5 23 50 59 81 19 159 Total Volume 148 190 721 1059 92 1082 110 1284 67 50 79 196 270 287 49 606 % App. Total 14 17.9 68.1 7.2 84.3 8.6 34.2 25.5 40.3 44.6 47.4 8.1 PHF .804 .754 .819 .822 .657 .933 .833 .922 .761 .781 .859 .925 .912 .886 .645 .953 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
544
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles
I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 40 26 152 218 18 153 21 192 16 10 11 37 56 58 8 122 569 07:15 AM 35 44 149 228 27 192 14 233 21 6 15 42 65 68 9 142 645 07:30 AM 23 55 196 274 16 249 25 290 15 13 9 37 57 59 12 128 729 07:45 AM 34 63 219 316 27 280 24 331 17 15 20 52 52 76 19 147 846 Total 132 188 716 1036 88 874 84 1046 69 44 55 168 230 261 48 539 2789 08:00 AM 29 43 139 211 33 246 17 296 12 15 18 45 48 62 9 119 671 08:15 AM 26 24 163 213 14 246 18 278 13 14 14 41 48 58 8 114 646 08:30 AM 23 36 127 186 24 216 23 263 21 5 21 47 41 57 25 123 619 08:45 AM 24 39 140 203 39 181 26 246 13 9 12 34 33 59 4 96 579 Total 102 142 569 813 110 889 84 1083 59 43 65 167 170 236 46 452 2515 Grand Total 234 330 1285 1849 198 1763 168 2129 128 87 120 335 400 497 94 991 5304 Apprch % 12.7 17.8 69.5 9.3 82.8 7.9 38.2 26 35.8 40.4 50.2 9.5 Total % 4.4 6.2 24.2 34.9 3.7 33.2 3.2 40.1 2.4 1.6 2.3 6.3 7.5 9.4 1.8 18.7 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 23 55 196 274 16 249 25 290 15 13 9 37 57 59 12 128 729 07:45 AM 34 63 219 316 27 280 24 331 17 15 20 52 52 76 19 147 846 08:00 AM 29 43 139 211 33 246 17 296 12 15 18 45 48 62 9 119 671 08:15 AM 26 24 163 213 14 246 18 278 13 14 14 41 48 58 8 114 646 Total Volume 112 185 717 1014 90 1021 84 1195 57 57 61 175 205 255 48 508 2892 % App. Total 11 18.2 70.7 7.5 85.4 7 32.6 32.6 34.9 40.4 50.2 9.4 PHF .824 .734 .818 .802 .682 .912 .840 .903 .838 .950 .763 .841 .899 .839 .632 .864 .855 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
545
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
717
Thru
185
Left
112
Out In Total
346 1014 1360
Right
84 Thru
1021
Left
90 Out Total In
428 1195 1623
Left
57 Thru
57 Right
61 Out In Total
323 175 498
Left
205
Thru
255
Right
48 Total Out In
1795 508 2303
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Passenger Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 23 55 196 274 16 249 25 290 15 13 9 37 57 59 12 128 +15 mins. 34 63 219 316 27 280 24 331 17 15 20 52 52 76 19 147 +30 mins. 29 43 139 211 33 246 17 296 12 15 18 45 48 62 9 119 +45 mins. 26 24 163 213 14 246 18 278 13 14 14 41 48 58 8 114 Total Volume 112 185 717 1014 90 1021 84 1195 57 57 61 175 205 255 48 508 % App. Total 11 18.2 70.7 7.5 85.4 7 32.6 32.6 34.9 40.4 50.2 9.4 PHF .824 .734 .818 .802 .682 .912 .840 .903 .838 .950 .763 .841 .899 .839 .632 .864 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
546
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle Vehicles
I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 1 0 1 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 8 4 0 12 17
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 6 0 1 0 1 6 5 0 11 18
07:30 AM 0 1 1 2 0 3 3 6 0 1 0 1 3 4 1 8 17
07:45 AM 1 0 0 1 0 4 2 6 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 9
Total 1 2 1 4 1 12 9 22 0 3 0 3 18 13 1 32 61
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 7 1 0 0 1 3 4 1 8 16
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 8 1 0 3 4 6 4 0 10 22
08:30 AM 0 0 2 2 0 5 2 7 1 0 2 3 3 3 1 7 19
08:45 AM 1 1 1 3 1 12 4 17 0 0 0 0 6 3 1 10 30
Total 1 1 3 5 2 28 9 39 3 0 5 8 18 14 3 35 87
Grand Total 2 3 4 9 3 40 18 61 3 3 5 11 36 27 4 67 148
Apprch % 22.2 33.3 44.4 4.9 65.6 29.5 27.3 27.3 45.5 53.7 40.3 6 Total % 1.4 2 2.7 6.1 2 27 12.2 41.2 2 2 3.4 7.4 24.3 18.2 2.7 45.3 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 1 1 2 0 3 3 6 0 1 0 1 3 4 1 8 17
07:45 AM 1 0 0 1 0 4 2 6 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 9
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 7 1 0 0 1 3 4 1 8 16
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 8 1 0 3 4 6 4 0 10 22
Total Volume 1 1 1 3 1 18 8 27 2 2 3 7 13 12 2 27 64
% App. Total 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.7 66.7 29.6 28.6 28.6 42.9 48.1 44.4 7.4 PHF .250 .250 .250 .375 .250 .750 .667 .844 .500 .500 .250 .438 .542 .750 .500 .675 .727 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
547
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
1 Thru
1 Left
1 Out In Total
23 3 26
Right
8 Thru
18 Left
1 Out Total In
16 27 43
Left
2 Thru
2 Right
3 Out In Total
4 7 11
Left
13 Thru
12 Right
2 Total Out In
21 27 48
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 0 1 1 2 0 3 3 6 0 1 0 1 3 4 1 8
+15 mins. 1 0 0 1 0 4 2 6 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
+30 mins. 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 7 1 0 0 1 3 4 1 8
+45 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 8 1 0 3 4 6 4 0 10
Total Volume 1 1 1 3 1 18 8 27 2 2 3 7 13 12 2 27
% App. Total 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.7 66.7 29.6 28.6 28.6 42.9 48.1 44.4 7.4 PHF .250 .250 .250 .375 .250 .750 .667 .844 .500 .500 .250 .438 .542 .750 .500 .675 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
548
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 3 Axle Vehicles
I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Total 1 0 0 1 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 8
08:00 AM 0 0 1 1 1 5 1 7 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 3 8
Total 0 0 1 1 1 12 3 16 1 1 0 2 1 3 0 4 23
Grand Total 1 0 1 2 1 15 4 20 1 1 0 2 2 5 0 7 31
Apprch % 50 0 50 5 75 20 50 50 0 28.6 71.4 0
Total % 3.2 0 3.2 6.5 3.2 48.4 12.9 64.5 3.2 3.2 0 6.5 6.5 16.1 0 22.6 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
08:00 AM 0 0 1 1 1 5 1 7 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
Total Volume 0 0 1 1 1 9 2 12 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 17
% App. Total 0 0 100 8.3 75 16.7 100 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .250 .450 .500 .429 .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .750 .000 .750 .472 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
549
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
1 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
2 1 3
Right
2 Thru
9 Left
1 Out Total In
3 12 15
Left
1 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
1 1 2
Left
0 Thru
3 Right
0 Total Out In
11 3 14
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
3 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
+15 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
+30 mins. 0 0 1 1 1 5 1 7 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
+45 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Total Volume 0 0 1 1 1 9 2 12 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3
% App. Total 0 0 100 8.3 75 16.7 100 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .250 .450 .500 .429 .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .750 .000 .750 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
550
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle Trucks
I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 5 0 1 6 0 5 5 10 0 0 1 1 4 5 0 9 26
07:15 AM 3 0 1 4 0 2 4 6 0 1 0 1 3 2 0 5 16
07:30 AM 2 0 1 3 0 12 4 16 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 27
07:45 AM 4 0 1 5 0 6 5 11 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 10 26
Total 14 0 4 18 0 25 18 43 0 1 1 2 21 11 0 32 95
08:00 AM 4 0 1 5 0 8 3 11 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 9 25
08:15 AM 0 0 2 2 0 8 4 12 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 3 18
08:30 AM 4 0 0 4 0 11 9 20 0 0 0 0 6 5 1 12 36
08:45 AM 3 0 5 8 0 17 5 22 0 0 0 0 7 5 0 12 42
Total 11 0 8 19 0 44 21 65 0 0 1 1 20 15 1 36 121
Grand Total 25 0 12 37 0 69 39 108 0 1 2 3 41 26 1 68 216 Apprch % 67.6 0 32.4 0 63.9 36.1 0 33.3 66.7 60.3 38.2 1.5 Total % 11.6 0 5.6 17.1 0 31.9 18.1 50 0 0.5 0.9 1.4 19 12 0.5 31.5 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 2 0 1 3 0 12 4 16 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 27
07:45 AM 4 0 1 5 0 6 5 11 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 10 26
08:00 AM 4 0 1 5 0 8 3 11 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 9 25
08:15 AM 0 0 2 2 0 8 4 12 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 3 18
Total Volume 10 0 5 15 0 34 16 50 0 0 1 1 21 9 0 30 96
% App. Total 66.7 0 33.3 0 68 32 0 0 100 70 30 0
PHF .625 .000 .625 .750 .000 .708 .800 .781 .000 .000 .250 .250 .656 .563 .000 .750 .889 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
551
File Name : RNC15S4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
5 Thru
0 Left
10 Out In Total
37 15 52
Right
16 Thru
34 Left
0 Out Total In
20 50 70
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
1 Out In Total
0 1 1
Left
21 Thru
9 Right
0 Total Out In
39 30 69
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 2 0 1 3 0 12 4 16 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8
+15 mins. 4 0 1 5 0 6 5 11 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 10
+30 mins. 4 0 1 5 0 8 3 11 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 9
+45 mins. 0 0 2 2 0 8 4 12 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 3
Total Volume 10 0 5 15 0 34 16 50 0 0 1 1 21 9 0 30
% App. Total 66.7 0 33.3 0 68 32 0 0 100 70 30 0
PHF .625 .000 .625 .750 .000 .708 .800 .781 .000 .000 .250 .250 .656 .563 .000 .750 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
552
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle Trucks I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 17 52 113 182 61 163 85 309 29 54 54 137 196 197 24 417 1045 04:15 PM 20 53 96 169 42 187 68 297 24 55 66 145 174 238 18 430 1041 04:30 PM 14 51 116 181 47 170 54 271 22 47 89 158 192 216 31 439 1049 04:45 PM 17 51 121 189 46 178 67 291 24 46 69 139 196 194 19 409 1028 Total 68 207 446 721 196 698 274 1168 99 202 278 579 758 845 92 1695 4163 05:00 PM 12 66 112 190 55 212 81 348 28 88 74 190 210 271 19 500 1228 05:15 PM 14 77 124 215 38 189 79 306 30 77 97 204 221 294 34 549 1274 05:30 PM 20 64 112 196 41 209 62 312 29 55 67 151 200 219 31 450 1109 05:45 PM 19 54 144 217 55 198 39 292 31 39 56 126 169 231 16 416 1051 Total 65 261 492 818 189 808 261 1258 118 259 294 671 800 1015 100 1915 4662 Grand Total 133 468 938 1539 385 1506 535 2426 217 461 572 1250 1558 1860 192 3610 8825 Apprch % 8.6 30.4 60.9 15.9 62.1 22.1 17.4 36.9 45.8 43.2 51.5 5.3 Total % 1.5 5.3 10.6 17.4 4.4 17.1 6.1 27.5 2.5 5.2 6.5 14.2 17.7 21.1 2.2 40.9 Passenger Vehicles 105 467 922 1494 383 1420 515 2318 215 459 571 1245 1529 1810 190 3529 8586 % Passenger Vehicles 78.9 99.8 98.3 97.1 99.5 94.3 96.3 95.5 99.1 99.6 99.8 99.6 98.1 97.3 99 97.8 97.3 Large 2 Axle Vehicles 8 0 2 10 1 31 4 36 1 1 0 2 3 13 2 18 66 % Large 2 Axle Vehicles 6 0 0.2 0.6 0.3 2.1 0.7 1.5 0.5 0.2 0 0.2 0.2 0.7 1 0.5 0.7 3 Axle Vehicles 0 1 1 2 1 11 1 13 1 1 1 3 1 13 0 14 32
% 3 Axle Vehicles 0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.7 0 0.4 0.4 4+ Axle Trucks 20 0 13 33 0 44 15 59 0 0 0 0 25 24 0 49 141 % 4+ Axle Trucks 15 0 1.4 2.1 0 2.9 2.8 2.4 0 0 0 0 1.6 1.3 0 1.4 1.6 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 12 66 112 190 55 212 81 348 28 88 74 190 210 271 19 500 1228 05:15 PM 14 77 124 215 38 189 79 306 30 77 97 204 221 294 34 549 1274 05:30 PM 20 64 112 196 41 209 62 312 29 55 67 151 200 219 31 450 1109 05:45 PM 19 54 144 217 55 198 39 292 31 39 56 126 169 231 16 416 1051 Total Volume 65 261 492 818 189 808 261 1258 118 259 294 671 800 1015 100 1915 4662 % App. Total 7.9 31.9 60.1 15 64.2 20.7 17.6 38.6 43.8 41.8 53 5.2 PHF .813 .847 .854 .942 .859 .953 .806 .904 .952 .736 .758 .822 .905 .863 .735 .872 .915 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
553
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
492
Thru
261
Left
65 Out In Total
1320 818 2138
Right
261
Thru
808
Left
189
Out Total In
1374 1258 2632
Left
118
Thru
259
Right
294
Out In Total
550 671 1221
Left
800 1015
Thru Right
100
Total Out In
1418 1915 3333
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Passenger Vehicles
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
3 Axle Vehicles
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
05:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 12 66 112 190 55 212 81 348 22 47 89 158 210 271 19 500 +15 mins. 14 77 124 215 38 189 79 306 24 46 69 139 221 294 34 549 +30 mins. 20 64 112 196 41 209 62 312 28 88 74 190 200 219 31 450 +45 mins. 19 54 144 217 55 198 39 292 30 77 97 204 169 231 16 416 Total Volume 65 261 492 818 189 808 261 1258 104 258 329 691 800 1015 100 1915 % App. Total 7.9 31.9 60.1 15 64.2 20.7 15.1 37.3 47.6 41.8 53 5.2 PHF .813 .847 .854 .942 .859 .953 .806 .904 .867 .733 .848 .847 .905 .863 .735 .872 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
554
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles
I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 14 52 109 175 61 154 81 296 28 54 54 136 189 193 24 406 1013 04:15 PM 16 53 95 164 42 170 63 275 24 55 65 144 173 231 17 421 1004 04:30 PM 9 50 115 174 46 159 53 258 22 47 89 158 187 211 30 428 1018 04:45 PM 13 51 120 184 45 163 64 272 24 46 69 139 195 189 19 403 998 Total 52 206 439 697 194 646 261 1101 98 202 277 577 744 824 90 1658 4033 05:00 PM 8 66 108 182 55 202 77 334 27 87 74 188 206 265 19 490 1194 05:15 PM 13 77 123 213 38 183 79 300 30 77 97 204 218 282 34 534 1251 05:30 PM 18 64 110 192 41 200 59 300 29 55 67 151 196 215 31 442 1085 05:45 PM 14 54 142 210 55 189 39 283 31 38 56 125 165 224 16 405 1023 Total 53 261 483 797 189 774 254 1217 117 257 294 668 785 986 100 1871 4553 Grand Total 105 467 922 1494 383 1420 515 2318 215 459 571 1245 1529 1810 190 3529 8586 Apprch % 7 31.3 61.7 16.5 61.3 22.2 17.3 36.9 45.9 43.3 51.3 5.4 Total % 1.2 5.4 10.7 17.4 4.5 16.5 6 27 2.5 5.3 6.7 14.5 17.8 21.1 2.2 41.1 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 8 66 108 182 55 202 77 334 27 87 74 188 206 265 19 490 1194 05:15 PM 13 77 123 213 38 183 79 300 30 77 97 204 218 282 34 534 1251 05:30 PM 18 64 110 192 41 200 59 300 29 55 67 151 196 215 31 442 1085 05:45 PM 14 54 142 210 55 189 39 283 31 38 56 125 165 224 16 405 1023 Total Volume 53 261 483 797 189 774 254 1217 117 257 294 668 785 986 100 1871 4553 % App. Total 6.6 32.7 60.6 15.5 63.6 20.9 17.5 38.5 44 42 52.7 5.3 PHF .736 .847 .850 .935 .859 .958 .804 .911 .944 .739 .758 .819 .900 .874 .735 .876 .910 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
555
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
483
Thru
261
Left
53 Out In Total
1296 797 2093
Right
254
Thru
774
Left
189
Out Total In
1333 1217 2550
Left
117
Thru
257
Right
294
Out In Total
550 668 1218
Left
785
Thru
986
Right
100
Total Out In
1374 1871 3245
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Passenger Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
05:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 8 66 108 182 55 202 77 334 24 46 69 139 206 265 19 490 +15 mins. 13 77 123 213 38 183 79 300 27 87 74 188 218 282 34 534 +30 mins. 18 64 110 192 41 200 59 300 30 77 97 204 196 215 31 442 +45 mins. 14 54 142 210 55 189 39 283 29 55 67 151 165 224 16 405 Total Volume 53 261 483 797 189 774 254 1217 110 265 307 682 785 986 100 1871 % App. Total 6.6 32.7 60.6 15.5 63.6 20.9 16.1 38.9 45 42 52.7 5.3 PHF .736 .847 .850 .935 .859 .958 .804 .911 .917 .761 .791 .836 .900 .874 .735 .876 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
556
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle Vehicles
I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 2 0 0 2 0 3 1 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 8
04:15 PM 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 11
04:30 PM 3 0 1 4 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 13
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 7
Total 7 0 1 8 1 18 2 21 1 0 0 1 2 5 2 9 39
05:00 PM 1 0 1 2 0 4 2 6 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 11
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 7
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 6
Total 1 0 1 2 0 13 2 15 0 1 0 1 1 8 0 9 27
Grand Total 8 0 2 10 1 31 4 36 1 1 0 2 3 13 2 18 66
Apprch % 80 0 20 2.8 86.1 11.1 50 50 0 16.7 72.2 11.1
Total % 12.1 0 3 15.2 1.5 47 6.1 54.5 1.5 1.5 0 3 4.5 19.7 3 27.3 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 7
05:00 PM 1 0 1 2 0 4 2 6 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 11
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 7
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
Total Volume 1 0 1 2 0 14 3 17 0 1 0 1 1 7 0 8 28
% App. Total 50 0 50 0 82.4 17.6 0 100 0 12.5 87.5 0
PHF .250 .000 .250 .250 .000 .700 .375 .708 .000 .250 .000 .250 .250 .583 .000 .500 .636 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
557
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
1 Thru
0 Left
1 Out In Total
5 2 7
Right
3 Thru
14 Left
0 Out Total In
8 17 25
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Out In Total
0 1 1
Left
1 Thru
7 Right
0 Total Out In
15 8 23
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:45 PM 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
+15 mins. 1 0 1 2 0 4 2 6 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 4
+30 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
+45 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total Volume 1 0 1 2 0 14 3 17 0 1 0 1 1 8 0 9
% App. Total 50 0 50 0 82.4 17.6 0 100 0 11.1 88.9 0
PHF .250 .000 .250 .250 .000 .700 .375 .708 .000 .250 .000 .250 .250 .667 .000 .563 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
558
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 3 Axle Vehicles
I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 4
04:30 PM 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total 0 1 0 1 1 5 0 6 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 4 12
05:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 3 1 4 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 7
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 5
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 3 5
Total 0 0 1 1 0 6 1 7 1 1 0 2 1 9 0 10 20
Grand Total 0 1 1 2 1 11 1 13 1 1 1 3 1 13 0 14 32
Apprch % 0 50 50 7.7 84.6 7.7 33.3 33.3 33.3 7.1 92.9 0 Total % 0 3.1 3.1 6.2 3.1 34.4 3.1 40.6 3.1 3.1 3.1 9.4 3.1 40.6 0 43.8 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 3 1 4 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 7
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 5
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 3 5
Total Volume 0 0 1 1 0 6 1 7 1 1 0 2 1 9 0 10 20
% App. Total 0 0 100 0 85.7 14.3 50 50 0 10 90 0
PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .500 .250 .438 .250 .250 .000 .500 .250 .450 .000 .500 .714 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
559
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
1 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
3 1 4
Right
1 Thru
6 Left
0 Out Total In
9 7 16
Left
1 Thru
1 Right
0 Out In Total
0 2 2
Left
1 Thru
9 Right
0 Total Out In
8 10 18
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
3 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:45 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
+15 mins. 0 0 1 1 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
+30 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
+45 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 3
Total Volume 0 0 1 1 1 7 1 9 1 1 0 2 1 9 0 10
% App. Total 0 0 100 11.1 77.8 11.1 50 50 0 10 90 0
PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .250 .583 .250 .563 .250 .250 .000 .500 .250 .450 .000 .500 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
560
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle Trucks
I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 1 0 4 5 0 6 3 9 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 9 23
04:15 PM 2 0 1 3 0 9 5 14 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 22
04:30 PM 2 0 0 2 0 6 1 7 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 14
04:45 PM 4 0 1 5 0 8 2 10 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 20
Total 9 0 6 15 0 29 11 40 0 0 0 0 12 12 0 24 79
05:00 PM 3 0 2 5 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 7 16
05:15 PM 1 0 1 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 6 11
05:30 PM 2 0 2 4 0 5 3 8 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 18
05:45 PM 5 0 2 7 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 6 17
Total 11 0 7 18 0 15 4 19 0 0 0 0 13 12 0 25 62
Grand Total 20 0 13 33 0 44 15 59 0 0 0 0 25 24 0 49 141 Apprch % 60.6 0 39.4 0 74.6 25.4 0 0 0 51 49 0
Total % 14.2 0 9.2 23.4 0 31.2 10.6 41.8 0 0 0 0 17.7 17 0 34.8 I-15 Southbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Ontario Mills Drive
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 4 0 1 5 0 8 2 10 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 20
05:00 PM 3 0 2 5 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 7 16
05:15 PM 1 0 1 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 6 11
05:30 PM 2 0 2 4 0 5 3 8 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 18
Total Volume 10 0 6 16 0 19 6 25 0 0 0 0 11 13 0 24 65
% App. Total 62.5 0 37.5 0 76 24 0 0 0 45.8 54.2 0
PHF .625 .000 .750 .800 .000 .594 .500 .625 .000 .000 .000 .000 .688 .813 .000 .857 .813 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
561
File Name : RNC15S4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Southbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Ontario Mills Drive
Right
6 Thru
0 Left
10 Out In Total
17 16 33
Right
6 Thru
19 Left
0 Out Total In
23 25 48
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
11 Thru
13 Right
0 Total Out In
25 24 49
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
05:00 PM 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 3 0 2 5 0 8 2 10 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 7
+15 mins. 1 0 1 2 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 6
+30 mins. 2 0 2 4 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 6
+45 mins. 5 0 2 7 0 5 3 8 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 6
Total Volume 11 0 7 18 0 19 6 25 0 0 0 0 13 12 0 25
% App. Total 61.1 0 38.9 0 76 24 0 0 0 52 48 0
PHF .550 .000 .875 .643 .000 .594 .500 .625 .000 .000 .000 .000 .813 .750 .000 .893 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
562
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle Trucks I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 63 19 129 211 13 75 10 98 13 10 10 33 41 67 15 123 465 07:15 AM 36 16 158 210 8 70 9 87 18 1 8 27 47 75 8 130 454 07:30 AM 62 18 193 273 9 109 13 131 29 3 13 45 32 61 12 105 554 07:45 AM 79 16 194 289 9 112 7 128 24 5 16 45 41 80 23 144 606 Total 240 69 674 983 39 366 39 444 84 19 47 150 161 283 58 502 2079 08:00 AM 86 9 202 297 15 87 16 118 23 6 9 38 43 67 18 128 581 08:15 AM 83 12 215 310 4 84 16 104 16 4 10 30 36 65 11 112 556 08:30 AM 53 11 182 246 11 79 13 103 23 6 10 39 39 60 16 115 503 08:45 AM 67 11 184 262 12 93 14 119 19 10 6 35 35 56 11 102 518 Total 289 43 783 1115 42 343 59 444 81 26 35 142 153 248 56 457 2158 Grand Total 529 112 1457 2098 81 709 98 888 165 45 82 292 314 531 114 959 4237 Apprch % 25.2 5.3 69.4 9.1 79.8 11 56.5 15.4 28.1 32.7 55.4 11.9 Total % 12.5 2.6 34.4 49.5 1.9 16.7 2.3 21 3.9 1.1 1.9 6.9 7.4 12.5 2.7 22.6 Passenger Vehicles 453 105 1373 1931 74 611 74 759 159 42 77 278 293 459 111 863 3831 % Passenger Vehicles 85.6 93.8 94.2 92 91.4 86.2 75.5 85.5 96.4 93.3 93.9 95.2 93.3 86.4 97.4 90 90.4 Large 2 Axle Vehicles 18 1 24 43 5 34 9 48 2 2 1 5 13 21 1 35 131 % Large 2 Axle Vehicles 3.4 0.9 1.6 2 6.2 4.8 9.2 5.4 1.2 4.4 1.2 1.7 4.1 4 0.9 3.6 3.1 3 Axle Vehicles 5 1 3 9 1 15 0 16 1 1 1 3 0 6 1 7 35
% 3 Axle Vehicles 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.4 1.2 2.1 0 1.8 0.6 2.2 1.2 1 0 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.8 4+ Axle Trucks 53 5 57 115 1 49 15 65 3 0 3 6 8 45 1 54 240 % 4+ Axle Trucks 10 4.5 3.9 5.5 1.2 6.9 15.3 7.3 1.8 0 3.7 2.1 2.5 8.5 0.9 5.6 5.7 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 62 18 193 273 9 109 13 131 29 3 13 45 32 61 12 105 554 07:45 AM 79 16 194 289 9 112 7 128 24 5 16 45 41 80 23 144 606 08:00 AM 86 9 202 297 15 87 16 118 23 6 9 38 43 67 18 128 581 08:15 AM 83 12 215 310 4 84 16 104 16 4 10 30 36 65 11 112 556 Total Volume 310 55 804 1169 37 392 52 481 92 18 48 158 152 273 64 489 2297 % App. Total 26.5 4.7 68.8 7.7 81.5 10.8 58.2 11.4 30.4 31.1 55.8 13.1 PHF .901 .764 .935 .943 .617 .875 .813 .918 .793 .750 .750 .878 .884 .853 .696 .849 .948 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
563
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
804
Thru
55 Left
310
Out In Total
222 1169 1391
Right
52 Thru
392
Left
37 Out Total In
631 481 1112
Left
92 Thru
18 Right
48 Out In Total
156 158 314
Left
152
Thru
273
Right
64 Total Out In
1288 489 1777
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Passenger Vehicles
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
3 Axle Vehicles
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 62 18 193 273 9 109 13 131 29 3 13 45 47 75 8 130 +15 mins. 79 16 194 289 9 112 7 128 24 5 16 45 32 61 12 105 +30 mins. 86 9 202 297 15 87 16 118 23 6 9 38 41 80 23 144 +45 mins. 83 12 215 310 4 84 16 104 16 4 10 30 43 67 18 128 Total Volume 310 55 804 1169 37 392 52 481 92 18 48 158 163 283 61 507 % App. Total 26.5 4.7 68.8 7.7 81.5 10.8 58.2 11.4 30.4 32.1 55.8 12 PHF .901 .764 .935 .943 .617 .875 .813 .918 .793 .750 .750 .878 .867 .884 .663 .880 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
564
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles
I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 56 17 122 195 11 66 10 87 13 9 9 31 34 58 15 107 420 07:15 AM 35 15 154 204 8 61 4 73 18 1 8 27 42 69 8 119 423 07:30 AM 53 18 181 252 9 96 10 115 27 3 12 42 32 55 12 99 508 07:45 AM 70 14 189 273 8 104 6 118 23 5 14 42 40 71 22 133 566 Total 214 64 646 924 36 327 30 393 81 18 43 142 148 253 57 458 1917 08:00 AM 79 7 193 279 14 74 12 100 21 5 8 34 41 56 18 115 528 08:15 AM 72 12 204 288 4 73 13 90 16 4 10 30 34 56 11 101 509 08:30 AM 40 11 169 220 11 63 9 83 23 6 10 39 36 50 15 101 443 08:45 AM 48 11 161 220 9 74 10 93 18 9 6 33 34 44 10 88 434 Total 239 41 727 1007 38 284 44 366 78 24 34 136 145 206 54 405 1914 Grand Total 453 105 1373 1931 74 611 74 759 159 42 77 278 293 459 111 863 3831 Apprch % 23.5 5.4 71.1 9.7 80.5 9.7 57.2 15.1 27.7 34 53.2 12.9 Total % 11.8 2.7 35.8 50.4 1.9 15.9 1.9 19.8 4.2 1.1 2 7.3 7.6 12 2.9 22.5 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 53 18 181 252 9 96 10 115 27 3 12 42 32 55 12 99 508 07:45 AM 70 14 189 273 8 104 6 118 23 5 14 42 40 71 22 133 566 08:00 AM 79 7 193 279 14 74 12 100 21 5 8 34 41 56 18 115 528 08:15 AM 72 12 204 288 4 73 13 90 16 4 10 30 34 56 11 101 509 Total Volume 274 51 767 1092 35 347 41 423 87 17 44 148 147 238 63 448 2111 % App. Total 25.1 4.7 70.2 8.3 82 9.7 58.8 11.5 29.7 32.8 53.1 14.1 PHF .867 .708 .940 .948 .625 .834 .788 .896 .806 .850 .786 .881 .896 .838 .716 .842 .932 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
565
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
767
Thru
51 Left
274
Out In Total
205 1092 1297
Right
41 Thru
347
Left
35 Out Total In
556 423 979
Left
87 Thru
17 Right
44 Out In Total
149 148 297
Left
147
Thru
238
Right
63 Total Out In
1201 448 1649
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Passenger Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 53 18 181 252 9 96 10 115 27 3 12 42 32 55 12 99 +15 mins. 70 14 189 273 8 104 6 118 23 5 14 42 40 71 22 133 +30 mins. 79 7 193 279 14 74 12 100 21 5 8 34 41 56 18 115 +45 mins. 72 12 204 288 4 73 13 90 16 4 10 30 34 56 11 101 Total Volume 274 51 767 1092 35 347 41 423 87 17 44 148 147 238 63 448 % App. Total 25.1 4.7 70.2 8.3 82 9.7 58.8 11.5 29.7 32.8 53.1 14.1 PHF .867 .708 .940 .948 .625 .834 .788 .896 .806 .850 .786 .881 .896 .838 .716 .842 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
566
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle Vehicles
I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 2 0 1 3 2 4 0 6 0 1 1 2 3 1 0 4 15
07:15 AM 1 0 2 3 0 4 3 7 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 6 16
07:30 AM 4 0 1 5 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 13
07:45 AM 0 0 2 2 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7
Total 7 0 6 13 2 15 5 22 0 1 1 2 7 7 0 14 51
08:00 AM 1 1 2 4 1 4 1 6 1 0 0 1 1 3 0 4 15
08:15 AM 2 0 4 6 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 8 20
08:30 AM 3 0 4 7 0 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 5 17
08:45 AM 5 0 8 13 2 7 0 9 1 1 0 2 1 3 0 4 28
Total 11 1 18 30 3 19 4 26 2 1 0 3 6 14 1 21 80
Grand Total 18 1 24 43 5 34 9 48 2 2 1 5 13 21 1 35 131 Apprch % 41.9 2.3 55.8 10.4 70.8 18.8 40 40 20 37.1 60 2.9 Total % 13.7 0.8 18.3 32.8 3.8 26 6.9 36.6 1.5 1.5 0.8 3.8 9.9 16 0.8 26.7 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 4 0 1 5 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 13
07:45 AM 0 0 2 2 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7
08:00 AM 1 1 2 4 1 4 1 6 1 0 0 1 1 3 0 4 15
08:15 AM 2 0 4 6 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 8 20
Total Volume 7 1 9 17 1 16 4 21 1 0 0 1 4 12 0 16 55
% App. Total 41.2 5.9 52.9 4.8 76.2 19 100 0 0 25 75 0
PHF .438 .250 .563 .708 .250 .800 1.00 .875 .250 .000 .000 .250 .500 .500 .000 .500 .688 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
567
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
9 Thru
1 Left
7 Out In Total
8 17 25
Right
4 Thru
16 Left
1 Out Total In
19 21 40
Left
1 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
2 1 3
Left
4 Thru
12 Right
0 Total Out In
26 16 42
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 4 0 1 5 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
+15 mins. 0 0 2 2 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
+30 mins. 1 1 2 4 1 4 1 6 1 0 0 1 1 3 0 4
+45 mins. 2 0 4 6 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 8
Total Volume 7 1 9 17 1 16 4 21 1 0 0 1 4 12 0 16
% App. Total 41.2 5.9 52.9 4.8 76.2 19 100 0 0 25 75 0
PHF .438 .250 .563 .708 .250 .800 1.000 .875 .250 .000 .000 .250 .500 .500 .000 .500 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
568
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 3 Axle Vehicles
I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:30 AM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
07:45 AM 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 5
Total 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 1 3 10
08:00 AM 1 0 2 3 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 8
08:15 AM 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
08:30 AM 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
08:45 AM 1 0 0 1 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 9
Total 5 0 2 7 1 12 0 13 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 4 25
Grand Total 5 1 3 9 1 15 0 16 1 1 1 3 0 6 1 7 35
Apprch % 55.6 11.1 33.3 6.2 93.8 0 33.3 33.3 33.3 0 85.7 14.3 Total % 14.3 2.9 8.6 25.7 2.9 42.9 0 45.7 2.9 2.9 2.9 8.6 0 17.1 2.9 20 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
07:45 AM 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 5
08:00 AM 1 0 2 3 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 8
08:15 AM 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
Total Volume 2 1 3 6 0 7 0 7 1 1 1 3 0 2 1 3 19
% App. Total 33.3 16.7 50 0 100 0 33.3 33.3 33.3 0 66.7 33.3 PHF .500 .250 .375 .500 .000 .438 .000 .438 .250 .250 .250 .750 .000 .500 .250 .375 .594 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
569
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
3 Thru
1 Left
2 Out In Total
1 6 7
Right
0 Thru
7 Left
0 Out Total In
5 7 12
Left
1 Thru
1 Right
1 Out In Total
2 3 5
Left
0 Thru
2 Right
1 Total Out In
11 3 14
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
3 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
+15 mins. 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2
+30 mins. 1 0 2 3 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
+45 mins. 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Total Volume 2 1 3 6 0 7 0 7 1 1 1 3 0 2 1 3
% App. Total 33.3 16.7 50 0 100 0 33.3 33.3 33.3 0 66.7 33.3 PHF .500 .250 .375 .500 .000 .438 .000 .438 .250 .250 .250 .750 .000 .500 .250 .375 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
570
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle Trucks
I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 5 2 6 13 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 11 28
07:15 AM 0 1 2 3 0 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 5 15
07:30 AM 5 0 10 15 0 8 2 10 1 0 1 2 0 3 0 3 30
07:45 AM 9 1 3 13 1 4 0 5 1 0 1 2 0 8 0 8 28
Total 19 4 21 44 1 21 4 26 2 0 2 4 6 21 0 27 101
08:00 AM 5 1 5 11 0 5 3 8 1 0 1 2 1 8 0 9 30
08:15 AM 8 0 7 15 0 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 24
08:30 AM 8 0 9 17 0 10 2 12 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 9 38
08:45 AM 13 0 15 28 0 8 4 12 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 7 47
Total 34 1 36 71 0 28 11 39 1 0 1 2 2 24 1 27 139
Grand Total 53 5 57 115 1 49 15 65 3 0 3 6 8 45 1 54 240 Apprch % 46.1 4.3 49.6 1.5 75.4 23.1 50 0 50 14.8 83.3 1.9 Total % 22.1 2.1 23.8 47.9 0.4 20.4 6.2 27.1 1.2 0 1.2 2.5 3.3 18.8 0.4 22.5 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 5 0 10 15 0 8 2 10 1 0 1 2 0 3 0 3 30
07:45 AM 9 1 3 13 1 4 0 5 1 0 1 2 0 8 0 8 28
08:00 AM 5 1 5 11 0 5 3 8 1 0 1 2 1 8 0 9 30
08:15 AM 8 0 7 15 0 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 24
Total Volume 27 2 25 54 1 22 7 30 3 0 3 6 1 21 0 22 112 % App. Total 50 3.7 46.3 3.3 73.3 23.3 50 0 50 4.5 95.5 0 PHF .750 .500 .625 .900 .250 .688 .583 .750 .750 .000 .750 .750 .250 .656 .000 .611 .933 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
571
File Name : RNC15N4AM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
25 Thru
2 Left
27 Out In Total
8 54 62
Right
7 Thru
22 Left
1 Out Total In
51 30 81
Left
3 Thru
0 Right
3 Out In Total
3 6 9
Left
1 Thru
21 Right
0 Total Out In
50 22 72
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 5 0 10 15 0 8 2 10 1 0 1 2 0 3 0 3
+15 mins. 9 1 3 13 1 4 0 5 1 0 1 2 0 8 0 8
+30 mins. 5 1 5 11 0 5 3 8 1 0 1 2 1 8 0 9
+45 mins. 8 0 7 15 0 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total Volume 27 2 25 54 1 22 7 30 3 0 3 6 1 21 0 22
% App. Total 50 3.7 46.3 3.3 73.3 23.3 50 0 50 4.5 95.5 0 PHF .750 .500 .625 .900 .250 .688 .583 .750 .750 .000 .750 .750 .250 .656 .000 .611 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
572
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle Trucks I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 27 11 139 177 17 165 55 237 21 16 10 47 157 113 16 286 747 04:15 PM 27 12 131 170 20 149 36 205 21 18 11 50 169 138 29 336 761 04:30 PM 31 14 139 184 18 143 36 197 28 14 9 51 174 142 20 336 768 04:45 PM 34 8 126 168 18 167 42 227 20 12 12 44 174 116 14 304 743 Total 119 45 535 699 73 624 169 866 90 60 42 192 674 509 79 1262 3019 05:00 PM 34 14 143 191 18 146 43 207 26 19 10 55 175 137 23 335 788 05:15 PM 21 21 115 157 12 168 22 202 25 19 18 62 173 195 24 392 813 05:30 PM 26 11 131 168 14 159 40 213 18 16 15 49 154 132 19 305 735 05:45 PM 29 10 135 174 14 143 24 181 17 15 15 47 147 140 16 303 705 Total 110 56 524 690 58 616 129 803 86 69 58 213 649 604 82 1335 3041 Grand Total 229 101 1059 1389 131 1240 298 1669 176 129 100 405 1323 1113 161 2597 6060 Apprch % 16.5 7.3 76.2 7.8 74.3 17.9 43.5 31.9 24.7 50.9 42.9 6.2 Total % 3.8 1.7 17.5 22.9 2.2 20.5 4.9 27.5 2.9 2.1 1.7 6.7 21.8 18.4 2.7 42.9 Passenger Vehicles 200 96 1020 1316 129 1178 280 1587 170 129 99 398 1310 1049 158 2517 5818 % Passenger Vehicles 87.3 95 96.3 94.7 98.5 95 94 95.1 96.6 100 99 98.3 99 94.2 98.1 96.9 96 Large 2 Axle Vehicles 8 1 8 17 2 21 2 25 3 0 1 4 2 21 2 25 71 % Large 2 Axle Vehicles 3.5 1 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.7 0.7 1.5 1.7 0 1 1 0.2 1.9 1.2 1 1.2 3 Axle Vehicles 5 4 4 13 0 12 4 16 1 0 0 1 1 8 1 10 40
% 3 Axle Vehicles 2.2 4 0.4 0.9 0 1 1.3 1 0.6 0 0 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.7 4+ Axle Trucks 16 0 27 43 0 29 12 41 2 0 0 2 10 35 0 45 131 % 4+ Axle Trucks 7 0 2.5 3.1 0 2.3 4 2.5 1.1 0 0 0.5 0.8 3.1 0 1.7 2.2 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 31 14 139 184 18 143 36 197 28 14 9 51 174 142 20 336 768 04:45 PM 34 8 126 168 18 167 42 227 20 12 12 44 174 116 14 304 743 05:00 PM 34 14 143 191 18 146 43 207 26 19 10 55 175 137 23 335 788 05:15 PM 21 21 115 157 12 168 22 202 25 19 18 62 173 195 24 392 813 Total Volume 120 57 523 700 66 624 143 833 99 64 49 212 696 590 81 1367 3112 % App. Total 17.1 8.1 74.7 7.9 74.9 17.2 46.7 30.2 23.1 50.9 43.2 5.9 PHF .882 .679 .914 .916 .917 .929 .831 .917 .884 .842 .681 .855 .994 .756 .844 .872 .957 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
573
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
523
Thru
57 Left
120
Out In Total
903 700 1603
Right
143
Thru
624
Left
66 Out Total In
759 833 1592
Left
99 Thru
64 Right
49 Out In Total
204 212 416
Left
696
Thru
590
Right
81 Total Out In
1246 1367 2613
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Passenger Vehicles
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
3 Axle Vehicles
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:15 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 27 12 131 170 17 165 55 237 26 19 10 55 174 142 20 336 +15 mins. 31 14 139 184 20 149 36 205 25 19 18 62 174 116 14 304 +30 mins. 34 8 126 168 18 143 36 197 18 16 15 49 175 137 23 335 +45 mins. 34 14 143 191 18 167 42 227 17 15 15 47 173 195 24 392 Total Volume 126 48 539 713 73 624 169 866 86 69 58 213 696 590 81 1367 % App. Total 17.7 6.7 75.6 8.4 72.1 19.5 40.4 32.4 27.2 50.9 43.2 5.9 PHF .926 .857 .942 .933 .913 .934 .768 .914 .827 .908 .806 .859 .994 .756 .844 .872 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
574
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles
I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 23 11 129 163 16 162 50 228 21 16 10 47 156 106 16 278 716 04:15 PM 21 12 125 158 19 138 32 189 20 18 11 49 165 128 29 322 718 04:30 PM 29 11 134 174 18 136 36 190 25 14 9 48 174 134 19 327 739 04:45 PM 33 8 120 161 18 156 41 215 20 12 12 44 171 110 13 294 714 Total 106 42 508 656 71 592 159 822 86 60 42 188 666 478 77 1221 2887 05:00 PM 29 14 140 183 18 140 42 200 24 19 9 52 173 132 22 327 762 05:15 PM 19 21 113 153 12 162 20 194 25 19 18 62 172 184 24 380 789 05:30 PM 21 9 127 157 14 147 39 200 18 16 15 49 153 126 19 298 704 05:45 PM 25 10 132 167 14 137 20 171 17 15 15 47 146 129 16 291 676 Total 94 54 512 660 58 586 121 765 84 69 57 210 644 571 81 1296 2931 Grand Total 200 96 1020 1316 129 1178 280 1587 170 129 99 398 1310 1049 158 2517 5818 Apprch % 15.2 7.3 77.5 8.1 74.2 17.6 42.7 32.4 24.9 52 41.7 6.3 Total % 3.4 1.7 17.5 22.6 2.2 20.2 4.8 27.3 2.9 2.2 1.7 6.8 22.5 18 2.7 43.3 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 29 11 134 174 18 136 36 190 25 14 9 48 174 134 19 327 739 04:45 PM 33 8 120 161 18 156 41 215 20 12 12 44 171 110 13 294 714 05:00 PM 29 14 140 183 18 140 42 200 24 19 9 52 173 132 22 327 762 05:15 PM 19 21 113 153 12 162 20 194 25 19 18 62 172 184 24 380 789 Total Volume 110 54 507 671 66 594 139 799 94 64 48 206 690 560 78 1328 3004 % App. Total 16.4 8 75.6 8.3 74.3 17.4 45.6 31.1 23.3 52 42.2 5.9 PHF .833 .643 .905 .917 .917 .917 .827 .929 .940 .842 .667 .831 .991 .761 .813 .874 .952 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
575
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
507
Thru
54 Left
110
Out In Total
893 671 1564
Right
139
Thru
594
Left
66 Out Total In
718 799 1517
Left
94 Thru
64 Right
48 Out In Total
198 206 404
Left
690
Thru
560
Right
78 Total Out In
1195 1328 2523
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Passenger Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 29 11 134 174 18 136 36 190 25 14 9 48 174 134 19 327 +15 mins. 33 8 120 161 18 156 41 215 20 12 12 44 171 110 13 294 +30 mins. 29 14 140 183 18 140 42 200 24 19 9 52 173 132 22 327 +45 mins. 19 21 113 153 12 162 20 194 25 19 18 62 172 184 24 380 Total Volume 110 54 507 671 66 594 139 799 94 64 48 206 690 560 78 1328 % App. Total 16.4 8 75.6 8.3 74.3 17.4 45.6 31.1 23.3 52 42.2 5.9 PHF .833 .643 .905 .917 .917 .917 .827 .929 .940 .842 .667 .831 .991 .761 .813 .874 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
576
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle Vehicles
I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 3 3 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 7
04:15 PM 3 0 2 5 1 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 1 5 0 6 16
04:30 PM 1 1 0 2 0 5 0 5 2 0 0 2 0 4 1 5 14
04:45 PM 1 0 1 2 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 8
Total 5 1 6 12 2 12 2 16 3 0 0 3 2 11 1 14 45
05:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 3 6
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 10
05:30 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
05:45 PM 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 8
Total 3 0 2 5 0 9 0 9 0 0 1 1 0 10 1 11 26
Grand Total 8 1 8 17 2 21 2 25 3 0 1 4 2 21 2 25 71
Apprch % 47.1 5.9 47.1 8 84 8 75 0 25 8 84 8
Total % 11.3 1.4 11.3 23.9 2.8 29.6 2.8 35.2 4.2 0 1.4 5.6 2.8 29.6 2.8 35.2 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 1 1 0 2 0 5 0 5 2 0 0 2 0 4 1 5 14
04:45 PM 1 0 1 2 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 8
05:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 3 6
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 10
Total Volume 2 1 2 5 0 16 0 16 2 0 1 3 1 11 2 14 38
% App. Total 40 20 40 0 100 0 66.7 0 33.3 7.1 78.6 14.3 PHF .500 .250 .500 .625 .000 .800 .000 .800 .250 .000 .250 .375 .250 .550 .500 .700 .679 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
577
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
2 Thru
1 Left
2 Out In Total
1 5 6
Right
0 Thru
16 Left
0 Out Total In
14 16 30
Left
2 Thru
0 Right
1 Out In Total
3 3 6
Left
1 Thru
11 Right
2 Total Out In
20 14 34
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 1 1 0 2 0 5 0 5 2 0 0 2 0 4 1 5
+15 mins. 1 0 1 2 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
+30 mins. 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 3
+45 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
Total Volume 2 1 2 5 0 16 0 16 2 0 1 3 1 11 2 14
% App. Total 40 20 40 0 100 0 66.7 0 33.3 7.1 78.6 14.3 PHF .500 .250 .500 .625 .000 .800 .000 .800 .250 .000 .250 .375 .250 .550 .500 .700 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
578
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 3 Axle Vehicles
I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2
04:15 PM 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4
04:30 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
04:45 PM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 4
Total 1 2 1 4 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 6 13
05:00 PM 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3
05:30 PM 2 2 2 6 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 13
05:45 PM 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6
Total 4 2 3 9 0 9 4 13 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 27
Grand Total 5 4 4 13 0 12 4 16 1 0 0 1 1 8 1 10 40
Apprch % 38.5 30.8 30.8 0 75 25 100 0 0 10 80 10
Total % 12.5 10 10 32.5 0 30 10 40 2.5 0 0 2.5 2.5 20 2.5 25 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
04:45 PM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 4
05:00 PM 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3
Total Volume 1 2 1 4 0 3 2 5 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 5 15
% App. Total 25 50 25 0 60 40 100 0 0 20 60 20
PHF .250 .250 .250 .500 .000 .375 .500 .417 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .375 .250 .625 .750 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
579
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
1 Thru
2 Left
1 Out In Total
3 4 7
Right
2 Thru
3 Left
0 Out Total In
4 5 9
Left
1 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
3 1 4
Left
1 Thru
3 Right
1 Total Out In
5 5 10
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
3 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
+15 mins. 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
+30 mins. 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
+45 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total Volume 1 2 1 4 0 3 2 5 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 5
% App. Total 25 50 25 0 60 40 100 0 0 20 60 20
PHF .250 .250 .250 .500 .000 .375 .500 .417 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .375 .250 .625 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
580
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle Trucks
I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 4 0 7 11 0 3 4 7 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 22
04:15 PM 2 0 4 6 0 7 3 10 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 7 23
04:30 PM 1 0 5 6 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 12
04:45 PM 0 0 4 4 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 7 17
Total 7 0 20 27 0 17 8 25 1 0 0 1 5 16 0 21 74
05:00 PM 4 0 2 6 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 5 15
05:15 PM 2 0 2 4 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 11
05:30 PM 3 0 1 4 0 6 1 7 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 16
05:45 PM 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 9 15
Total 9 0 7 16 0 12 4 16 1 0 0 1 5 19 0 24 57
Grand Total 16 0 27 43 0 29 12 41 2 0 0 2 10 35 0 45 131 Apprch % 37.2 0 62.8 0 70.7 29.3 100 0 0 22.2 77.8 0
Total % 12.2 0 20.6 32.8 0 22.1 9.2 31.3 1.5 0 0 1.5 7.6 26.7 0 34.4 I-15 Northbound On / Off
Ramps
Southbound
Fourth Street
Westbound
Driveway
Northbound
Fourth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 1 0 5 6 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 12
04:45 PM 0 0 4 4 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 7 17
05:00 PM 4 0 2 6 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 5 15
05:15 PM 2 0 2 4 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 11
Total Volume 7 0 13 20 0 11 2 13 2 0 0 2 4 16 0 20 55
% App. Total 35 0 65 0 84.6 15.4 100 0 0 20 80 0
PHF .438 .000 .650 .833 .000 .550 .500 .542 .500 .000 .000 .500 .500 .667 .000 .714 .809 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
581
File Name : RNC15N4PM
Site Code : 09814452
Start Date : 11/20/2014
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
E/W: Fourth Street
Weather: Clear
I-15 Northbound On / Off Ramps
Fourth Street
Fourth Street
Driveway
Right
13 Thru
0 Left
7 Out In Total
6 20 26
Right
2 Thru
11 Left
0 Out Total In
23 13 36
Left
2 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 2 2
Left
4 Thru
16 Right
0 Total Out In
26 20 46
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 1 0 5 6 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3
+15 mins. 0 0 4 4 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 7
+30 mins. 4 0 2 6 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 5
+45 mins. 2 0 2 4 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5
Total Volume 7 0 13 20 0 11 2 13 2 0 0 2 4 16 0 20
% App. Total 35 0 65 0 84.6 15.4 100 0 0 20 80 0
PHF .438 .000 .650 .833 .000 .550 .500 .542 .500 .000 .000 .500 .500 .667 .000 .714 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92787
(951) 268-6268
582
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle Trucks Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 19 312 6 337 38 7 0 45 12 350 24 386 2 5 19 26 794 07:15 AM 16 337 9 362 50 11 4 65 16 329 22 367 4 2 17 23 817 07:30 AM 13 315 10 338 35 16 3 54 11 381 32 424 4 10 23 37 853 07:45 AM 35 331 17 383 39 19 2 60 16 466 41 523 7 13 19 39 1005 Total 83 1295 42 1420 162 53 9 224 55 1526 119 1700 17 30 78 125 3469 08:00 AM 25 288 4 317 27 9 7 43 22 494 31 547 4 16 16 36 943 08:15 AM 19 278 5 302 18 14 4 36 16 399 35 450 1 6 16 23 811 08:30 AM 17 262 5 284 31 9 3 43 12 385 22 419 3 10 21 34 780 08:45 AM 22 238 9 269 15 5 3 23 21 421 20 462 4 3 15 22 776 Total 83 1066 23 1172 91 37 17 145 71 1699 108 1878 12 35 68 115 3310 Grand Total 166 2361 65 2592 253 90 26 369 126 3225 227 3578 29 65 146 240 6779 Apprch % 6.4 91.1 2.5 68.6 24.4 7 3.5 90.1 6.3 12.1 27.1 60.8 Total % 2.4 34.8 1 38.2 3.7 1.3 0.4 5.4 1.9 47.6 3.3 52.8 0.4 1 2.2 3.5 Passenger Vehicles 163 2201 64 2428 248 89 26 363 123 3076 223 3422 29 64 144 237 6450 % Passenger Vehicles 98.2 93.2 98.5 93.7 98 98.9 100 98.4 97.6 95.4 98.2 95.6 100 98.5 98.6 98.8 95.1 Large 2 Axle Vehicles 2 67 0 69 4 1 0 5 2 79 4 85 0 0 1 1 160 % Large 2 Axle Vehicles 1.2 2.8 0 2.7 1.6 1.1 0 1.4 1.6 2.4 1.8 2.4 0 0 0.7 0.4 2.4 3 Axle Vehicles 1 10 0 11 1 0 0 1 1 12 0 13 0 1 0 1 26
% 3 Axle Vehicles 0.6 0.4 0 0.4 0.4 0 0 0.3 0.8 0.4 0 0.4 0 1.5 0 0.4 0.4 4+ Axle Trucks 0 83 1 84 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 58 0 0 1 1 143
% 4+ Axle Trucks 0 3.5 1.5 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 0 1.6 0 0 0.7 0.4 2.1 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 16 337 9 362 50 11 4 65 16 329 22 367 4 2 17 23 817 07:30 AM 13 315 10 338 35 16 3 54 11 381 32 424 4 10 23 37 853 07:45 AM 35 331 17 383 39 19 2 60 16 466 41 523 7 13 19 39 1005 08:00 AM 25 288 4 317 27 9 7 43 22 494 31 547 4 16 16 36 943 Total Volume 89 1271 40 1400 151 55 16 222 65 1670 126 1861 19 41 75 135 3618 % App. Total 6.4 90.8 2.9 68 24.8 7.2 3.5 89.7 6.8 14.1 30.4 55.6 PHF .636 .943 .588 .914 .755 .724 .571 .854 .739 .845 .768 .851 .679 .641 .815 .865 .900 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
583
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
40 Thru
1271
Left
89 Out In Total
1705 1400 3105
Right
16 Thru
55 Left
151
Out Total In
256 222 478
Left
65 Thru
1670
Right
126
Out In Total
1497 1861 3358
Left
19 Thru
41 Right
75 Total Out In
160 135 295
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Passenger Vehicles
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
3 Axle Vehicles
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 19 312 6 337 38 7 0 45 11 381 32 424 4 2 17 23 +15 mins. 16 337 9 362 50 11 4 65 16 466 41 523 4 10 23 37 +30 mins. 13 315 10 338 35 16 3 54 22 494 31 547 7 13 19 39 +45 mins. 35 331 17 383 39 19 2 60 16 399 35 450 4 16 16 36 Total Volume 83 1295 42 1420 162 53 9 224 65 1740 139 1944 19 41 75 135 % App. Total 5.8 91.2 3 72.3 23.7 4 3.3 89.5 7.2 14.1 30.4 55.6 PHF .593 .961 .618 .927 .810 .697 .563 .862 .739 .881 .848 .888 .679 .641 .815 .865 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
584
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 19 288 6 313 37 7 0 44 11 332 24 367 2 5 19 26 750 07:15 AM 16 320 9 345 50 11 4 65 15 317 22 354 4 1 17 22 786 07:30 AM 13 300 10 323 35 16 3 54 11 371 31 413 4 10 23 37 827 07:45 AM 34 312 17 363 39 19 2 60 16 454 41 511 7 13 19 39 973 Total 82 1220 42 1344 161 53 9 223 53 1474 118 1645 17 29 78 124 3336 08:00 AM 25 271 4 300 26 8 7 41 22 466 30 518 4 16 16 36 895 08:15 AM 18 259 4 281 18 14 4 36 16 383 35 434 1 6 16 23 774 08:30 AM 17 234 5 256 29 9 3 41 12 362 21 395 3 10 20 33 725 08:45 AM 21 217 9 247 14 5 3 22 20 391 19 430 4 3 14 21 720 Total 81 981 22 1084 87 36 17 140 70 1602 105 1777 12 35 66 113 3114 Grand Total 163 2201 64 2428 248 89 26 363 123 3076 223 3422 29 64 144 237 6450 Apprch % 6.7 90.7 2.6 68.3 24.5 7.2 3.6 89.9 6.5 12.2 27 60.8 Total % 2.5 34.1 1 37.6 3.8 1.4 0.4 5.6 1.9 47.7 3.5 53.1 0.4 1 2.2 3.7 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 AM to 08:00 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 16 320 9 345 50 11 4 65 15 317 22 354 4 1 17 22 786 07:30 AM 13 300 10 323 35 16 3 54 11 371 31 413 4 10 23 37 827 07:45 AM 34 312 17 363 39 19 2 60 16 454 41 511 7 13 19 39 973 08:00 AM 25 271 4 300 26 8 7 41 22 466 30 518 4 16 16 36 895 Total Volume 88 1203 40 1331 150 54 16 220 64 1608 124 1796 19 40 75 134 3481 % App. Total 6.6 90.4 3 68.2 24.5 7.3 3.6 89.5 6.9 14.2 29.9 56 PHF .647 .940 .588 .917 .750 .711 .571 .846 .727 .863 .756 .867 .679 .625 .815 .859 .894 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
585
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
40 Thru
1203
Left
88 Out In Total
1643 1331 2974
Right
16 Thru
54 Left
150
Out Total In
252 220 472
Left
64 Thru
1608
Right
124
Out In Total
1428 1796 3224
Left
19 Thru
40 Right
75 Total Out In
158 134 292
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Passenger Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 AM to 08:00 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 16 320 9 345 50 11 4 65 15 317 22 354 4 1 17 22 +15 mins. 13 300 10 323 35 16 3 54 11 371 31 413 4 10 23 37 +30 mins. 34 312 17 363 39 19 2 60 16 454 41 511 7 13 19 39 +45 mins. 25 271 4 300 26 8 7 41 22 466 30 518 4 16 16 36 Total Volume 88 1203 40 1331 150 54 16 220 64 1608 124 1796 19 40 75 134 % App. Total 6.6 90.4 3 68.2 24.5 7.3 3.6 89.5 6.9 14.2 29.9 56 PHF .647 .940 .588 .917 .750 .711 .571 .846 .727 .863 .756 .867 .679 .625 .815 .859 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
586
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 10 0 10 1 0 0 1 1 8 0 9 0 0 0 0 20
07:15 AM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 17
07:30 AM 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 8 0 0 0 0 14
07:45 AM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 13
Total 0 32 0 32 1 0 0 1 1 29 1 31 0 0 0 0 64
08:00 AM 0 4 0 4 1 1 0 2 0 11 1 12 0 0 0 0 18
08:15 AM 1 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 17
08:30 AM 0 13 0 13 2 0 0 2 0 13 1 14 0 0 0 0 29
08:45 AM 1 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 19 1 21 0 0 1 1 32
Total 2 35 0 37 3 1 0 4 1 50 3 54 0 0 1 1 96
Grand Total 2 67 0 69 4 1 0 5 2 79 4 85 0 0 1 1 160
Apprch % 2.9 97.1 0 80 20 0 2.4 92.9 4.7 0 0 100
Total % 1.2 41.9 0 43.1 2.5 0.6 0 3.1 1.2 49.4 2.5 53.1 0 0 0.6 0.6 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 AM to 08:00 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 17
07:30 AM 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 8 0 0 0 0 14
07:45 AM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 13
08:00 AM 0 4 0 4 1 1 0 2 0 11 1 12 0 0 0 0 18
Total Volume 0 26 0 26 1 1 0 2 0 32 2 34 0 0 0 0 62
% App. Total 0 100 0 50 50 0 0 94.1 5.9 0 0 0
PHF .000 .813 .000 .813 .250 .250 .000 .250 .000 .727 .500 .708 .000 .000 .000 .000 .861 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
587
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
0 Thru
26 Left
0 Out In Total
32 26 58
Right
0 Thru
1 Left
1 Out Total In
2 2 4
Left
0 Thru
32 Right
2 Out In Total
27 34 61
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
1 0 1
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 AM to 08:00 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0
+15 mins. 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 8 0 0 0 0
+30 mins. 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0
+45 mins. 0 4 0 4 1 1 0 2 0 11 1 12 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 26 0 26 1 1 0 2 0 32 2 34 0 0 0 0
% App. Total 0 100 0 50 50 0 0 94.1 5.9 0 0 0
PHF .000 .813 .000 .813 .250 .250 .000 .250 .000 .727 .500 .708 .000 .000 .000 .000 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
588
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 3 Axle Vehicles
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
07:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3
07:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
07:45 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
Total 1 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 6 0 1 0 1 13
08:00 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
08:30 AM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
08:45 AM 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Total 0 5 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 13
Grand Total 1 10 0 11 1 0 0 1 1 12 0 13 0 1 0 1 26
Apprch % 9.1 90.9 0 100 0 0 7.7 92.3 0 0 100 0
Total % 3.8 38.5 0 42.3 3.8 0 0 3.8 3.8 46.2 0 50 0 3.8 0 3.8 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 AM to 08:00 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3
07:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
07:45 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
08:00 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
Total Volume 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 6 0 1 0 1 11
% App. Total 25 75 0 0 0 0 16.7 83.3 0 0 100 0
PHF .250 .750 .000 1.00 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .625 .000 .750 .000 .250 .000 .250 .917 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
589
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
1 Out In Total
5 4 9
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
2 0 2
Left
1 Thru
5 Right
0 Out In Total
3 6 9
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Total Out In
1 1 2
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
3 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 AM to 08:00 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
+15 mins. 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
+30 mins. 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
+45 mins. 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 6 0 1 0 1
% App. Total 25 75 0 0 0 0 16.7 83.3 0 0 100 0
PHF .250 .750 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .625 .000 .750 .000 .250 .000 .250 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
590
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle Trucks
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 19
07:15 AM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 11
07:30 AM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 10
07:45 AM 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 16
Total 0 38 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 56
08:00 AM 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 27
08:15 AM 0 10 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 18
08:30 AM 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 1 1 23
08:45 AM 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 19
Total 0 45 1 46 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 40 0 0 1 1 87
Grand Total 0 83 1 84 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 58 0 0 1 1 143
Apprch % 0 98.8 1.2 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
Total % 0 58 0.7 58.7 0 0 0 0 0 40.6 0 40.6 0 0 0.7 0.7 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 AM to 08:00 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 11
07:30 AM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 10
07:45 AM 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 16
08:00 AM 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 27
Total Volume 0 39 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 0 0 0 0 64
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .813 .000 .813 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .417 .000 .417 .000 .000 .000 .000 .593 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
591
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours AM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
0 Thru
39 Left
0 Out In Total
25 39 64
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
25 Right
0 Out In Total
39 25 64
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 AM to 08:00 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0
+15 mins. 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
+30 mins. 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0
+45 mins. 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 39 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 0 0 0 0
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .813 .000 .813 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .417 .000 .417 .000 .000 .000 .000 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
592
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle Trucks Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 15 400 4 419 22 14 16 52 8 503 71 582 7 11 16 34 1087 04:15 PM 21 346 2 369 28 9 25 62 16 521 45 582 2 7 4 13 1026 04:30 PM 13 435 7 455 38 15 28 81 3 593 39 635 6 4 7 17 1188 04:45 PM 7 398 4 409 43 23 16 82 12 531 55 598 5 8 14 27 1116 Total 56 1579 17 1652 131 61 85 277 39 2148 210 2397 20 30 41 91 4417 05:00 PM 10 489 7 506 39 26 21 86 8 502 40 550 5 11 20 36 1178 05:15 PM 10 440 8 458 44 23 24 91 21 546 35 602 8 14 19 41 1192 05:30 PM 11 318 5 334 31 33 31 95 15 496 31 542 5 10 12 27 998 05:45 PM 8 317 11 336 40 16 30 86 11 500 43 554 7 6 10 23 999 Total 39 1564 31 1634 154 98 106 358 55 2044 149 2248 25 41 61 127 4367 Grand Total 95 3143 48 3286 285 159 191 635 94 4192 359 4645 45 71 102 218 8784 Apprch % 2.9 95.6 1.5 44.9 25 30.1 2 90.2 7.7 20.6 32.6 46.8 Total % 1.1 35.8 0.5 37.4 3.2 1.8 2.2 7.2 1.1 47.7 4.1 52.9 0.5 0.8 1.2 2.5 Passenger Vehicles 94 3045 47 3186 281 158 191 630 94 4078 355 4527 45 70 102 217 8560 % Passenger Vehicles 98.9 96.9 97.9 97 98.6 99.4 100 99.2 100 97.3 98.9 97.5 100 98.6 100 99.5 97.4 Large 2 Axle Vehicles 1 40 1 42 4 0 0 4 0 44 4 48 0 1 0 1 95 % Large 2 Axle Vehicles 1.1 1.3 2.1 1.3 1.4 0 0 0.6 0 1 1.1 1 0 1.4 0 0.5 1.1 3 Axle Vehicles 0 9 0 9 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 20
% 3 Axle Vehicles 0 0.3 0 0.3 0 0.6 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0.2 4+ Axle Trucks 0 49 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 60 0 0 0 0 109
% 4+ Axle Trucks 0 1.6 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 1.4 0 1.3 0 0 0 0 1.2 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 13 435 7 455 38 15 28 81 3 593 39 635 6 4 7 17 1188 04:45 PM 7 398 4 409 43 23 16 82 12 531 55 598 5 8 14 27 1116 05:00 PM 10 489 7 506 39 26 21 86 8 502 40 550 5 11 20 36 1178 05:15 PM 10 440 8 458 44 23 24 91 21 546 35 602 8 14 19 41 1192 Total Volume 40 1762 26 1828 164 87 89 340 44 2172 169 2385 24 37 60 121 4674 % App. Total 2.2 96.4 1.4 48.2 25.6 26.2 1.8 91.1 7.1 19.8 30.6 49.6 PHF .769 .901 .813 .903 .932 .837 .795 .934 .524 .916 .768 .939 .750 .661 .750 .738 .980 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
593
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
26 Thru
1762
Left
40 Out In Total
2285 1828 4113
Right
89 Thru
87 Left
164
Out Total In
246 340 586
Left
44 Thru
2172
Right
169
Out In Total
1986 2385 4371
Left
24 Thru
37 Right
60 Total Out In
157 121 278
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Passenger Vehicles
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
3 Axle Vehicles
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 05:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:45 PM
+0 mins. 13 435 7 455 39 26 21 86 8 503 71 582 5 8 14 27 +15 mins. 7 398 4 409 44 23 24 91 16 521 45 582 5 11 20 36 +30 mins. 10 489 7 506 31 33 31 95 3 593 39 635 8 14 19 41 +45 mins. 10 440 8 458 40 16 30 86 12 531 55 598 5 10 12 27 Total Volume 40 1762 26 1828 154 98 106 358 39 2148 210 2397 23 43 65 131 % App. Total 2.2 96.4 1.4 43 27.4 29.6 1.6 89.6 8.8 17.6 32.8 49.6 PHF .769 .901 .813 .903 .875 .742 .855 .942 .609 .906 .739 .944 .719 .768 .813 .799 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
594
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 14 381 4 399 21 13 16 50 8 487 70 565 7 11 16 34 1048 04:15 PM 21 336 2 359 28 9 25 62 16 509 45 570 2 7 4 13 1004 04:30 PM 13 419 7 439 37 15 28 80 3 575 39 617 6 4 7 17 1153 04:45 PM 7 390 4 401 43 23 16 82 12 517 54 583 5 8 14 27 1093 Total 55 1526 17 1598 129 60 85 274 39 2088 208 2335 20 30 41 91 4298 05:00 PM 10 484 7 501 38 26 21 85 8 493 40 541 5 11 20 36 1163 05:15 PM 10 425 7 442 44 23 24 91 21 531 33 585 8 14 19 41 1159 05:30 PM 11 305 5 321 31 33 31 95 15 481 31 527 5 9 12 26 969 05:45 PM 8 305 11 324 39 16 30 85 11 485 43 539 7 6 10 23 971 Total 39 1519 30 1588 152 98 106 356 55 1990 147 2192 25 40 61 126 4262 Grand Total 94 3045 47 3186 281 158 191 630 94 4078 355 4527 45 70 102 217 8560 Apprch % 3 95.6 1.5 44.6 25.1 30.3 2.1 90.1 7.8 20.7 32.3 47 Total % 1.1 35.6 0.5 37.2 3.3 1.8 2.2 7.4 1.1 47.6 4.1 52.9 0.5 0.8 1.2 2.5 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 13 419 7 439 37 15 28 80 3 575 39 617 6 4 7 17 1153 04:45 PM 7 390 4 401 43 23 16 82 12 517 54 583 5 8 14 27 1093 05:00 PM 10 484 7 501 38 26 21 85 8 493 40 541 5 11 20 36 1163 05:15 PM 10 425 7 442 44 23 24 91 21 531 33 585 8 14 19 41 1159 Total Volume 40 1718 25 1783 162 87 89 338 44 2116 166 2326 24 37 60 121 4568 % App. Total 2.2 96.4 1.4 47.9 25.7 26.3 1.9 91 7.1 19.8 30.6 49.6 PHF .769 .887 .893 .890 .920 .837 .795 .929 .524 .920 .769 .942 .750 .661 .750 .738 .982 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
595
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
25 Thru
1718
Left
40 Out In Total
2229 1783 4012
Right
89 Thru
87 Left
162
Out Total In
243 338 581
Left
44 Thru
2116
Right
166
Out In Total
1940 2326 4266
Left
24 Thru
37 Right
60 Total Out In
156 121 277
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Passenger Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 13 419 7 439 37 15 28 80 3 575 39 617 6 4 7 17 +15 mins. 7 390 4 401 43 23 16 82 12 517 54 583 5 8 14 27 +30 mins. 10 484 7 501 38 26 21 85 8 493 40 541 5 11 20 36 +45 mins. 10 425 7 442 44 23 24 91 21 531 33 585 8 14 19 41 Total Volume 40 1718 25 1783 162 87 89 338 44 2116 166 2326 24 37 60 121 % App. Total 2.2 96.4 1.4 47.9 25.7 26.3 1.9 91 7.1 19.8 30.6 49.6 PHF .769 .887 .893 .890 .920 .837 .795 .929 .524 .920 .769 .942 .750 .661 .750 .738 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
596
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 1 9 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 9 1 10 0 0 0 0 21
04:15 PM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 8
04:30 PM 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 11
04:45 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 8 0 0 0 0 10
Total 1 18 0 19 2 0 0 2 0 27 2 29 0 0 0 0 50
05:00 PM 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 7
05:15 PM 0 8 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 13
05:30 PM 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 8
05:45 PM 0 7 0 7 1 0 0 1 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 17
Total 0 22 1 23 2 0 0 2 0 17 2 19 0 1 0 1 45
Grand Total 1 40 1 42 4 0 0 4 0 44 4 48 0 1 0 1 95
Apprch % 2.4 95.2 2.4 100 0 0 0 91.7 8.3 0 100 0
Total % 1.1 42.1 1.1 44.2 4.2 0 0 4.2 0 46.3 4.2 50.5 0 1.1 0 1.1 Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 11
04:45 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 8 0 0 0 0 10
05:00 PM 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 7
05:15 PM 0 8 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 13
Total Volume 0 17 1 18 2 0 0 2 0 18 3 21 0 0 0 0 41
% App. Total 0 94.4 5.6 100 0 0 0 85.7 14.3 0 0 0
PHF .000 .531 .250 .500 .500 .000 .000 .500 .000 .643 .375 .656 .000 .000 .000 .000 .788 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
597
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
1 Thru
17 Left
0 Out In Total
18 18 36
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
2 Out Total In
3 2 5
Left
0 Thru
18 Right
3 Out In Total
19 21 40
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
1 0 1
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0
+15 mins. 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 8 0 0 0 0
+30 mins. 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0
+45 mins. 0 8 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 17 1 18 2 0 0 2 0 18 3 21 0 0 0 0
% App. Total 0 94.4 5.6 100 0 0 0 85.7 14.3 0 0 0
PHF .000 .531 .250 .500 .500 .000 .000 .500 .000 .643 .375 .656 .000 .000 .000 .000 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
598
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 3 Axle Vehicles
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
04:15 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
04:30 PM 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 8
04:45 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 6 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 11
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
05:15 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 5
05:30 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 9
Grand Total 0 9 0 9 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 20
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
Total % 0 45 0 45 0 5 0 5 0 50 0 50 0 0 0 0
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 8
04:45 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
05:15 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 5
Total Volume 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 15
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .438 .000 .438 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .469 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
599
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
0 Thru
7 Left
0 Out In Total
8 7 15
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
8 Right
0 Out In Total
7 8 15
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
3 Axle Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0
+15 mins. 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
+30 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
+45 mins. 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .438 .000 .438 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
600
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle Trucks
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 17
04:15 PM 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 13
04:30 PM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 16
04:45 PM 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 12
Total 0 29 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 29 0 0 0 0 58
05:00 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 7
05:15 PM 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 15
05:30 PM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 18
05:45 PM 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 11
Total 0 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 31 0 0 0 0 51
Grand Total 0 49 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 60 0 0 0 0 109
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
Total % 0 45 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 55 0 0 0 0
Haven Avenue
Southbound
Concours Street
Westbound
Haven Avenue
Northbound
Concours Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 16
04:45 PM 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 12
05:00 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 7
05:15 PM 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 15
Total Volume 0 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 30 0 0 0 0 50
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .625 .000 .625 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .000 .000 .000 .781 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
601
File Name : 04_RNC_Haven_Concours PM
Site Code : 99919439
Start Date : 5/23/2019
Page No : 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N/S: Haven Avenue
E/W: Concours Street
Weather: Clear
Haven Avenue
Concours Street
Concours Street
Haven Avenue
Right
0 Thru
20 Left
0 Out In Total
30 20 50
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
30 Right
0 Out In Total
20 30 50
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
4+ Axle Trucks
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0
+15 mins. 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0
+30 mins. 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0
+45 mins. 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 30 0 0 0 0
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .625 .000 .625 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .000 .000 .000 Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
602
File Name : 09_ONT_Concours_Ontario Center_AM
Site Code : 10521235
Start Date : 5/27/2021
Page No : 1
City of Ontario
N/S: Concours Street
E/W: Ontario Center Parkway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Concours Street
Southbound
Driveway
Westbound
Concours Street
Northbound
Ontario Center Parkway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 98 8 106 0 0 0 0 5 66 2 73 1 0 2 3 182
07:15 AM 0 108 8 116 0 0 0 0 4 67 2 73 1 0 0 1 190
07:30 AM 1 122 9 132 2 1 0 3 11 78 5 94 0 0 0 0 229
07:45 AM 0 136 11 147 0 0 0 0 8 100 3 111 0 0 0 0 258
Total 1 464 36 501 2 1 0 3 28 311 12 351 2 0 2 4 859
08:00 AM 0 110 8 118 0 0 0 0 3 74 3 80 0 0 2 2 200
08:15 AM 0 116 12 128 0 0 1 1 5 99 4 108 0 0 0 0 237
08:30 AM 0 106 5 111 2 0 1 3 2 96 2 100 2 0 2 4 218
08:45 AM 0 114 4 118 1 0 1 2 7 97 3 107 4 0 0 4 231
Total 0 446 29 475 3 0 3 6 17 366 12 395 6 0 4 10 886
Grand Total 1 910 65 976 5 1 3 9 45 677 24 746 8 0 6 14 1745 Apprch % 0.1 93.2 6.7 55.6 11.1 33.3 6 90.8 3.2 57.1 0 42.9 Total % 0.1 52.1 3.7 55.9 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 2.6 38.8 1.4 42.8 0.5 0 0.3 0.8 Concours Street
Southbound
Driveway
Westbound
Concours Street
Northbound
Ontario Center Parkway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 1 122 9 132 2 1 0 3 11 78 5 94 0 0 0 0 229
07:45 AM 0 136 11 147 0 0 0 0 8 100 3 111 0 0 0 0 258
08:00 AM 0 110 8 118 0 0 0 0 3 74 3 80 0 0 2 2 200
08:15 AM 0 116 12 128 0 0 1 1 5 99 4 108 0 0 0 0 237
Total Volume 1 484 40 525 2 1 1 4 27 351 15 393 0 0 2 2 924 % App. Total 0.2 92.2 7.6 50 25 25 6.9 89.3 3.8 0 0 100 PHF .250 .890 .833 .893 .250 .250 .250 .333 .614 .878 .750 .885 .000 .000 .250 .250 .895 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

Ontario City CouncilApril 19, 2022

Ontario City Council
April 19, 2022