Agenda packet — Ontario City Council, April 19, 2022 (part 8 of 12)

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 2523
Lanes and Geometrics Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 12: Milliken Avenue & Inland Empire Boulevard 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 125 130 255 210 330 160 200 120
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3072 3539 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3072 3539 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 354 197 564 193
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 523 447 1114 993
Travel Time (s) 11.9 10.2 25.3 22.6
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
2524
Volume Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 12: Milliken Avenue & Inland Empire Boulevard 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Volume (vph) 251 417 382 504 195 191 488 1643 1112 200 1948 157 Future Volume (vph) 251 417 382 504 195 191 488 1643 1112 200 1948 157 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr)
Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 259 430 394 520 201 197 503 1694 1146 206 2008 162 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 259 430 394 520 201 197 503 1694 1146 206 2008 162 Intersection Summary
2525
Timings Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 12: Milliken Avenue & Inland Empire Boulevard 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 251 417 382 504 195 191 488 1643 1112 200 1948 157 Future Volume (vph) 251 417 382 504 195 191 488 1643 1112 200 1948 157 Turn Type Prot NA Free Prot NA Free Prot NA Free Prot NA Free Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free Free Free Free
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 21.0 22.5 22.7 24.2 23.0 47.8 17.0 41.8 Total Split (%) 19.1% 20.5% 20.6% 22.0% 20.9% 43.5% 15.5% 38.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None Min None Min
Act Effct Green (s) 14.0 16.8 108.8 18.2 21.0 108.8 18.5 44.4 108.8 11.4 37.3 108.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.15 1.00 0.17 0.19 1.00 0.17 0.41 1.00 0.10 0.34 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.79 0.25 1.01 0.29 0.12 0.96 0.65 0.72 0.64 0.91 0.10 Control Delay 53.3 55.6 0.4 88.6 39.5 0.2 77.0 27.7 2.9 56.2 42.0 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 53.3 55.6 0.4 88.6 39.5 0.2 77.0 27.7 2.9 56.2 42.0 0.1

LOS D E A F D A E C A E D A
Approach Delay 35.0 58.9 26.6 40.4
Approach LOS C E C D
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 110
Actuated Cycle Length: 108.8
Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01
Intersection Signal Delay: 35.9 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 12: Milliken Avenue & Inland Empire Boulevard 2526
Queues Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 12: Milliken Avenue & Inland Empire Boulevard 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 259 430 394 520 201 197 503 1694 1146 206 2008 162 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.79 0.25 1.01 0.29 0.12 0.96 0.65 0.72 0.64 0.91 0.10 Control Delay 53.3 55.6 0.4 88.6 39.5 0.2 77.0 27.7 2.9 56.2 42.0 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 53.3 55.6 0.4 88.6 39.5 0.2 77.0 27.7 2.9 56.2 42.0 0.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 90 154 0 ~202 64 0 184 282 0 72 393 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 131 210 0 #309 101 0 #292 324 0 111 #451 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 443 367 1034 913
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 130 255 210 330 160 200 120
Base Capacity (vph) 465 585 1583 514 682 1583 522 2614 1583 353 2197 1583 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.74 0.25 1.01 0.29 0.12 0.96 0.65 0.72 0.58 0.91 0.10 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
2527
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 12: Milliken Avenue & Inland Empire Boulevard 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 251 417 382 504 195 191 488 1643 1112 200 1948 157 Future Volume (veh/h) 251 417 382 504 195 191 488 1643 1112 200 1948 157 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 259 430 0 520 201 0 503 1694 0 206 2008 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 323 514 525 746 534 2778 265 2219
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.00 0.17 0.21 0.00 0.17 0.43 0.00 0.09 0.34 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3092 3554 1585 3092 3554 1585 3092 6434 1585 3092 6434 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 259 430 0 520 201 0 503 1694 0 206 2008 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1546 1777 1585 1546 1777 1585 1546 1609 1585 1546 1609 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.8 12.6 0.0 18.0 5.1 0.0 17.2 21.8 0.0 7.0 31.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.8 12.6 0.0 18.0 5.1 0.0 17.2 21.8 0.0 7.0 31.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 323 514 525 746 534 2778 265 2219 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.84 0.99 0.27 0.94 0.61 0.78 0.90
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 476 597 525 746 534 2778 361 2240 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.9 44.6 0.0 44.4 35.4 0.0 43.8 23.5 0.0 48.0 33.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.0 9.0 0.0 36.6 0.2 0.0 25.3 0.4 0.0 7.2 5.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.6 6.2 0.0 9.5 2.2 0.0 8.4 8.1 0.0 2.9 13.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.9 53.6 0.0 81.0 35.6 0.0 69.1 23.9 0.0 55.2 39.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D F D E C E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 689 A 721 A 2197 A 2214 A
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.3 68.3 34.2 40.6
Approach LOS D E C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.7 50.8 22.7 20.0 23.0 41.4 15.7 27.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 43.3 18.2 18.0 18.5 37.3 16.5 19.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.0 23.8 20.0 14.6 19.2 33.8 10.8 7.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 12.5 0.0 0.9 0.0 3.1 0.4 0.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.1
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 2528
Lanes and Geometrics Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 13: Haven Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 175 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.925 0.850
Flt Protected 0.976
Satd. Flow (prot) 3091 1441 6408 0 0 6408
Flt Permitted 0.976
Satd. Flow (perm) 3091 1441 6408 0 0 6408
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 1
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 592 1067 1034
Travel Time (s) 13.5 24.3 23.5
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
2529
Volume Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 13: Haven Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Traffic Volume (vph) 339 677 2709 0 0 1817
Future Volume (vph) 339 677 2709 0 0 1817
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.98 0.98
Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr)
Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 346 691 2764 0 0 1854
Shared Lane Traffic (%) 50%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 692 345 2764 0 0 1854
Intersection Summary
2530
Timings Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 13: Haven Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 339 677 2709 1817
Future Volume (vph) 339 677 2709 1817
Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA
Protected Phases 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 8
Detector Phase 8 8 2 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 36.0 36.0
Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 60.0% 60.0%
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None Min Min
Act Effct Green (s) 17.5 17.5 31.6 31.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.54 0.54
v/c Ratio 0.74 0.79 0.79 0.53
Control Delay 23.7 34.1 13.2 9.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 23.7 34.1 13.2 9.6

LOS C C B A
Approach Delay 27.2 13.2 9.6
Approach LOS C B A
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 58.1
Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.6 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 13: Haven Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps
2531
Queues Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 13: Haven Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 692 345 2764 1854
v/c Ratio 0.74 0.79 0.79 0.53
Control Delay 23.7 34.1 13.2 9.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 23.7 34.1 13.2 9.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 109 118 221 118
Queue Length 95th (ft) 162 #249 271 148
Internal Link Dist (ft) 512 987 954
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175
Base Capacity (vph) 1040 485 3482 3482
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.71 0.79 0.53
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
2532
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 13: Haven Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 339 677 2709 0 0 1817
Future Volume (veh/h) 339 677 2709 0 0 1817
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1772 1870 1870 0 0 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 346 691 2764 0 0 1854
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.98 0.98
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 0 0 2
Cap, veh/h 473 888 3587 0 0 3587
Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.56
Sat Flow, veh/h 1688 3170 6958 0 0 6958
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 346 691 2764 0 0 1854
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1688 1585 1609 0 0 1609
Q Serve(g_s), s 10.3 11.1 18.5 0.0 0.0 9.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.3 11.1 18.5 0.0 0.0 9.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 473 888 3587 0 0 3587
V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.78 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.52
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 593 1115 3655 0 0 3655
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.1 18.4 9.5 0.0 0.0 7.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.5 2.8 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 2.6
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.6 21.2 10.5 0.0 0.0 7.7
LnGrp LOS C C B A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1037 2764 1854
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.3 10.5 7.7
Approach LOS C B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.4 35.4 20.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 31.5 19.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.5 11.9 13.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 10.4 13.6 2.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.6
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 2533
Lanes and Geometrics Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 50 50 190 235 585 150 500 50
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3072 1863 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3072 1863 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 95 155 125 55
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 411 496 902 1114
Travel Time (s) 9.3 11.3 20.5 25.3
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
2534
Volume Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Volume (vph) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Future Volume (vph) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr)
Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 Intersection Summary
2535
Timings Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Future Volume (vph) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 7
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 3 1 6 7
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 35.5 34.5 34.5 23.5 22.5 22.5 16.0 43.0 23.5 19.0 46.0 35.5 Total Split (%) 29.6% 28.8% 28.8% 19.6% 18.8% 18.8% 13.3% 35.8% 19.6% 15.8% 38.3% 29.6% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None None Min None Act Effct Green (s) 31.0 30.3 30.3 18.7 18.0 18.0 11.5 38.5 61.7 14.5 41.5 77.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.32 0.51 0.12 0.35 0.64 v/c Ratio 1.28 0.73 0.42 0.87 0.98 0.42 1.07 1.00 0.72 1.24 0.72 1.16 Control Delay 171.5 51.7 22.0 68.9 85.8 10.7 124.8 60.2 23.4 171.6 36.5 105.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 171.5 51.7 22.0 68.9 85.8 10.7 124.8 60.2 23.4 171.6 36.5 105.4

LOS F D C E F B F E C F D F
Approach Delay 126.1 68.7 59.3 80.9
Approach LOS F E E F
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.28
Intersection Signal Delay: 80.0 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 2536
Queues Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 v/c Ratio 1.28 0.73 0.42 0.87 0.98 0.42 1.07 1.00 0.72 1.24 0.72 1.16 Control Delay 171.5 51.7 22.0 68.9 85.8 10.7 124.8 60.2 23.4 171.6 36.5 105.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 171.5 51.7 22.0 68.9 85.8 10.7 124.8 60.2 23.4 171.6 36.5 105.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~511 246 63 163 213 0 ~140 459 298 ~227 312 ~1089 Queue Length 95th (ft) #641 356 134 #247 #328 60 #233 #555 449 #333 356 #1353 Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 416 822 1034
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50 190 235 585 150 500 50
Base Capacity (vph) 793 469 470 486 530 369 294 2055 878 371 2216 1035 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.28 0.73 0.42 0.86 0.98 0.42 1.07 1.00 0.72 1.24 0.72 1.16 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
2537
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Future Volume (veh/h) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 799 482 408 466 533 238 296 2064 747 374 2225 958 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 3092 1870 1585 3092 3554 1585 3092 6434 1585 3092 6434 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1546 1870 1585 1546 1777 1585 1546 1609 1585 1546 1609 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 31.0 20.1 12.6 15.9 17.5 11.1 11.5 38.1 38.5 14.5 26.0 41.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 31.0 20.1 12.6 15.9 17.5 11.1 11.5 38.1 38.5 14.5 26.0 41.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 799 482 408 466 533 238 296 2064 747 374 2225 958 V/C Ratio(X) 1.27 0.71 0.48 0.89 0.98 0.65 1.07 0.99 0.85 1.23 0.72 1.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 799 482 408 490 533 238 296 2064 747 374 2225 958 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.5 40.5 37.7 50.0 50.8 48.0 54.2 40.6 27.9 52.8 34.2 23.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 130.0 5.0 0.9 18.2 32.6 6.2 71.0 18.3 9.0 124.3 1.2 123.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 26.2 9.9 5.0 7.3 10.2 4.8 7.4 17.5 17.4 12.1 10.3 57.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 174.5 45.5 38.6 68.2 83.4 54.2 125.2 58.9 36.8 177.0 35.3 146.7 LnGrp LOS F D D E F D F E D F D F
Approach Vol, veh/h 1552 1092 3000 3261
Approach Delay, s/veh 128.8 73.5 61.2 96.3
Approach LOS F E E F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.0 43.0 22.6 35.4 16.0 46.0 35.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.5 38.5 19.0 30.0 11.5 41.5 31.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.5 40.5 17.9 22.1 13.5 43.5 33.0 19.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 87.3
HCM 6th LOS F
Notes
User approved changes to right turn type.
2538
Lanes and Geometrics Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 15: Haven Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 230 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.86 0.86 1.00
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.992 0.850
Flt Protected 0.955
Satd. Flow (prot) 3243 1441 0 6408 6408 0
Flt Permitted 0.955
Satd. Flow (perm) 3243 1441 0 6408 6408 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 1
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 521 1400 1067
Travel Time (s) 11.8 31.8 24.3
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
2539
Volume Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 15: Haven Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Traffic Volume (vph) 1437 752 0 2079 1704 0
Future Volume (vph) 1437 752 0 2079 1704 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr)
Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 1481 775 0 2143 1757 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%) 10%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1559 697 0 2143 1757 0
Intersection Summary
2540
Timings Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 15: Haven Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBR NBT SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1437 752 2079 1704
Future Volume (vph) 1437 752 2079 1704
Turn Type Prot Perm NA NA
Protected Phases 4 2 6
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 4 4 2 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 37.0 37.0 28.0 28.0
Total Split (%) 56.9% 56.9% 43.1% 43.1%
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None Min Min
Act Effct Green (s) 32.5 32.5 23.5 23.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.36 0.36
v/c Ratio 0.96 0.97 0.93 0.76
Control Delay 32.4 45.3 28.7 20.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.4 45.3 28.7 20.9

LOS C D C C
Approach Delay 36.4 28.7 20.9
Approach LOS D C C
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97
Intersection Signal Delay: 29.2 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 15: Haven Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps
2541
Queues Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 15: Haven Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBR NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1559 697 2143 1757
v/c Ratio 0.96 0.97 0.93 0.76
Control Delay 32.4 45.3 28.7 20.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.4 45.3 28.7 20.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 284 272 230 173
Queue Length 95th (ft) #452 #525 #315 215
Internal Link Dist (ft) 441 1320 987
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230
Base Capacity (vph) 1622 721 2316 2316
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.96 0.97 0.93 0.76
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
2542
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 15: Haven Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1437 752 0 2079 1704 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 1437 752 0 2079 1704 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1772 1870 0 1870 1870 0
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1502 752 0 2143 1757 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 0 2 2 0
Cap, veh/h 1684 791 0 2329 2329 0
Arrive On Green 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3375 1585 0 6958 6958 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1502 752 0 2143 1757 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1688 1585 0 1609 1609 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 26.0 29.3 0.0 20.6 15.5 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 26.0 29.3 0.0 20.6 15.5 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1684 791 0 2329 2329 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.95 0.00 0.92 0.75 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1693 795 0 2334 2334 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.6 15.5 0.0 19.8 18.1 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.4 20.8 0.0 6.6 1.4 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.8 13.3 0.0 8.0 5.4 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.1 36.2 0.0 26.3 19.6 0.0
LnGrp LOS C D A C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 2254 2143 1757
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.1 26.3 19.6
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.0 36.8 28.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.5 32.5 23.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.6 31.3 17.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 1.0 4.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.3
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 2543
Lanes and Geometrics Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 16: Milliken Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1700 1900 1700 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 50 0 295 85
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.86 1.00
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3072 1583 3072 6408 6408 1583
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3072 1583 3072 6408 6408 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 51
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 413 606 902
Travel Time (s) 9.4 13.8 20.5
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
2544
Volume Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 16: Milliken Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Traffic Volume (vph) 1243 310 221 1617 1183 912
Future Volume (vph) 1243 310 221 1617 1183 912
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr)
Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 1281 320 228 1667 1220 940
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1281 320 228 1667 1220 940
Intersection Summary
2545
Timings Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 16: Milliken Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1243 310 221 1617 1183 912
Future Volume (vph) 1243 310 221 1617 1183 912
Turn Type Prot pm+ov Prot NA NA pm+ov
Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 4
Permitted Phases 4 6
Detector Phase 4 5 5 2 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 39.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 24.0 39.0
Total Split (%) 52.0% 16.0% 16.0% 48.0% 32.0% 52.0%
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None Min Min None
Act Effct Green (s) 34.0 46.0 7.5 31.3 19.3 57.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.62 0.10 0.42 0.26 0.78
v/c Ratio 0.91 0.33 0.74 0.62 0.73 0.76
Control Delay 30.4 7.9 48.6 18.1 28.3 9.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 30.4 7.9 48.6 18.1 28.3 9.1

LOS C A D B C A
Approach Delay 25.9 21.8 20.0
Approach LOS C C B
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 75
Actuated Cycle Length: 74.3
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91
Intersection Signal Delay: 22.3 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 16: Milliken Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps
2546
Queues Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 16: Milliken Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1281 320 228 1667 1220 940
v/c Ratio 0.91 0.33 0.74 0.62 0.73 0.76
Control Delay 30.4 7.9 48.6 18.1 28.3 9.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 30.4 7.9 48.6 18.1 28.3 9.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 271 62 54 170 150 155
Queue Length 95th (ft) #413 105 #105 206 188 296
Internal Link Dist (ft) 333 526 822
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 295 85
Base Capacity (vph) 1426 979 310 2716 1681 1253
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.33 0.74 0.61 0.73 0.75
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
2547
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 16: Milliken Avenue & I-10 EB Ramps 09/15/2021
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1243 310 221 1617 1183 912
Future Volume (veh/h) 1243 310 221 1617 1183 912
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1870 1673 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1281 320 228 1667 1220 940
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1393 870 304 2743 1714 1137
Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.10 0.43 0.27 0.27
Sat Flow, veh/h 3092 1585 3092 6696 6696 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1281 320 228 1667 1220 940
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1546 1585 1546 1609 1609 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 28.4 8.3 5.3 14.7 12.6 19.5
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.4 8.3 5.3 14.7 12.6 19.5
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1393 870 304 2743 1714 1137
V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.37 0.75 0.61 0.71 0.83
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1458 903 317 2770 1714 1137
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.9 9.3 32.1 16.2 24.3 5.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.5 0.3 9.2 0.4 1.4 5.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.9 9.5 2.3 5.0 4.7 18.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.3 9.6 41.3 16.6 25.7 10.9
LnGrp LOS C A D B C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1601 1895 2160
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 19.6 19.2
Approach LOS C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.7 37.5 11.7 24.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 34.5 7.5 19.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.7 30.4 7.3 21.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 10.1 2.5 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.9
HCM 6th LOS C
2548
Appendix J
Intersection LOS Analysis Sheets
Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions
With Improvements
2549
Lanes and Geometrics Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report AM Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1600 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 50 50 190 235 585 150 500 50
Storage Lanes 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 4202 1863 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 4202 1863 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 186 205 473 162
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 411 496 902 1114
Travel Time (s) 9.3 11.3 20.5 25.3
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
2550
Volume Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report AM Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Volume (vph) 852 125 332 227 259 48 216 1256 421 117 835 354 Future Volume (vph) 852 125 332 227 259 48 216 1256 421 117 835 354 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr)
Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 957 140 373 255 291 54 243 1411 473 131 938 398 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 957 140 373 255 291 54 243 1411 473 131 938 398 Intersection Summary
2551
Timings Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report AM Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 852 125 332 227 259 48 216 1256 421 117 835 354 Future Volume (vph) 852 125 332 227 259 48 216 1256 421 117 835 354 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 7
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 3 1 6 7
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 23.0 31.2 31.2 14.3 22.5 22.5 11.5 25.0 14.3 9.5 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 28.8% 39.0% 39.0% 17.9% 28.1% 28.1% 14.4% 31.3% 17.9% 11.9% 28.8% 28.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None None Min None Act Effct Green (s) 18.5 21.0 21.0 9.5 11.9 11.9 7.0 20.5 34.5 5.0 18.5 41.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.28 0.28 0.13 0.16 0.16 0.09 0.28 0.47 0.07 0.25 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.27 0.64 0.65 0.51 0.13 0.84 0.79 0.48 0.63 0.58 0.41 Control Delay 41.9 21.9 16.8 40.0 31.5 0.6 59.9 29.4 3.3 49.8 26.5 7.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.9 21.9 16.8 40.0 31.5 0.6 59.9 29.4 3.3 49.8 26.5 7.2

LOS D C B D C A E C A D C A
Approach Delay 33.6 32.3 27.1 23.3
Approach LOS C C C C
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 80
Actuated Cycle Length: 74
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91
Intersection Signal Delay: 28.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 2552
Queues Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report AM Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 957 140 373 255 291 54 243 1411 473 131 938 398 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.27 0.64 0.65 0.51 0.13 0.84 0.79 0.48 0.63 0.58 0.41 Control Delay 41.9 21.9 16.8 40.0 31.5 0.6 59.9 29.4 3.3 49.8 26.5 7.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.9 21.9 16.8 40.0 31.5 0.6 59.9 29.4 3.3 49.8 26.5 7.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 148 50 70 57 64 0 56 170 0 30 108 50 Queue Length 95th (ft) #250 91 153 #103 98 0 #127 235 49 #72 154 124 Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 416 822 1034
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50 190 235 585 150 500 50
Base Capacity (vph) 1052 673 691 407 862 540 291 1778 995 207 1605 960 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.91 0.21 0.54 0.63 0.34 0.10 0.84 0.79 0.48 0.63 0.58 0.41 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
2553
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report AM Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 852 125 332 227 259 48 216 1256 421 117 835 354 Future Volume (veh/h) 852 125 332 227 259 48 216 1256 421 117 835 354 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1575 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 957 140 373 255 291 54 243 1411 473 131 938 398 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1079 512 434 342 460 205 310 1879 638 204 1659 813 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 4230 1870 1585 3092 3554 1585 3092 6434 1585 3092 6434 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 957 140 373 255 291 54 243 1411 473 131 938 398 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1410 1870 1585 1546 1777 1585 1546 1609 1585 1546 1609 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.2 4.1 15.6 5.6 5.4 2.1 5.4 13.9 17.8 2.9 8.9 11.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.2 4.1 15.6 5.6 5.4 2.1 5.4 13.9 17.8 2.9 8.9 11.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1079 512 434 342 460 205 310 1879 638 204 1659 813 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.27 0.86 0.75 0.63 0.26 0.78 0.75 0.74 0.64 0.57 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1120 715 606 434 915 408 310 1888 640 221 1703 824 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.1 19.9 24.1 30.1 28.8 27.4 30.7 22.4 17.8 31.8 22.5 11.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.6 0.3 8.8 5.2 1.4 0.7 12.4 1.7 4.6 5.5 0.4 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.6 1.7 6.5 2.2 2.3 0.8 2.5 5.1 6.7 1.2 3.2 3.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.7 20.2 32.9 35.4 30.3 28.1 43.1 24.1 22.4 37.4 22.9 11.5 LnGrp LOS C C C D C C D C C D C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1470 600 2127 1467
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.2 32.2 25.9 21.1
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.1 24.9 12.2 23.6 11.5 22.5 22.3 13.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 20.5 9.8 26.7 7.0 18.5 18.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 19.8 7.6 17.6 7.4 13.4 17.2 7.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.2 1.5 0.0 3.3 0.6 1.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved changes to right turn type.
2554
Lanes and Geometrics Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report PM Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1600 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 50 50 190 235 585 150 500 50
Storage Lanes 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 4202 1863 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 4202 1863 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 142 177 143 55
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 411 496 902 1114
Travel Time (s) 9.3 11.3 20.5 25.3
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
2555
Volume Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report PM Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Volume (vph) 1162 275 332 354 421 89 337 1441 634 465 1572 670 Future Volume (vph) 1162 275 332 354 421 89 337 1441 634 465 1572 670 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr)
Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 1210 286 346 369 439 93 351 1501 660 484 1638 698 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1210 286 346 369 439 93 351 1501 660 484 1638 698 Intersection Summary
2556
Timings Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report PM Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1162 275 332 354 421 89 337 1441 634 465 1572 670 Future Volume (vph) 1162 275 332 354 421 89 337 1441 634 465 1572 670 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 7
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 3 1 6 7
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 39.0 32.7 32.7 28.8 22.5 22.5 19.2 34.5 28.8 24.0 39.3 39.0 Total Split (%) 32.5% 27.3% 27.3% 24.0% 18.8% 18.8% 16.0% 28.8% 24.0% 20.0% 32.8% 32.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None None Min None Act Effct Green (s) 34.5 31.3 31.3 20.7 17.5 17.5 14.7 30.0 55.2 19.5 34.8 73.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.25 0.46 0.16 0.29 0.62 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.59 0.67 0.69 0.85 0.24 0.93 0.93 0.82 0.97 0.88 0.70 Control Delay 67.9 45.2 30.6 53.4 65.9 1.5 83.8 55.3 30.6 82.6 46.8 18.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 67.9 45.2 30.6 53.4 65.9 1.5 83.8 55.3 30.6 82.6 46.8 18.8

LOS E D C D E A F E C F D B
Approach Delay 57.4 54.2 52.8 46.0
Approach LOS E D D D
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 119.5
Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00
Intersection Signal Delay: 51.6 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 2557
Queues Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report PM Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 1210 286 346 369 439 93 351 1501 660 484 1638 698 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.59 0.67 0.69 0.85 0.24 0.93 0.93 0.82 0.97 0.88 0.70 Control Delay 67.9 45.2 30.6 53.4 65.9 1.5 83.8 55.3 30.6 82.6 46.8 18.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 67.9 45.2 30.6 53.4 65.9 1.5 83.8 55.3 30.6 82.6 46.8 18.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~333 194 143 139 175 0 140 332 349 194 352 317 Queue Length 95th (ft) #438 298 262 186 #254 0 #232 #404 500 #302 401 464 Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 416 822 1034
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50 190 235 585 150 500 50
Base Capacity (vph) 1213 488 519 625 532 388 378 1609 851 501 1866 998 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.00 0.59 0.67 0.59 0.83 0.24 0.93 0.93 0.78 0.97 0.88 0.70 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
2558
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report PM Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1162 275 332 354 421 89 337 1441 634 465 1572 670 Future Volume (veh/h) 1162 275 332 354 421 89 337 1441 634 465 1572 670 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1575 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1210 286 346 369 439 93 351 1501 660 484 1638 698 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1227 546 462 435 506 225 382 1623 623 507 1883 924 Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 4230 1870 1585 3092 3554 1585 3092 6434 1585 3092 6434 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1210 286 346 369 439 93 351 1501 660 484 1638 698 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1410 1870 1585 1546 1777 1585 1546 1609 1585 1546 1609 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 33.8 15.2 23.5 13.8 14.4 6.4 13.3 27.1 30.0 18.5 28.7 34.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 33.8 15.2 23.5 13.8 14.4 6.4 13.3 27.1 30.0 18.5 28.7 34.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1227 546 462 435 506 225 382 1623 623 507 1883 924 V/C Ratio(X) 0.99 0.52 0.75 0.85 0.87 0.41 0.92 0.92 1.06 0.95 0.87 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1227 546 462 632 538 240 382 1623 623 507 1883 924 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.0 35.2 38.2 49.9 49.9 46.5 51.5 43.4 36.1 49.3 39.9 18.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 22.3 0.9 6.6 7.3 13.6 1.2 26.7 9.4 52.9 28.8 4.7 3.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 14.1 7.1 9.9 5.8 7.3 2.6 6.6 11.7 26.7 9.1 11.9 14.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 64.2 36.1 44.8 57.1 63.5 47.7 78.2 52.8 89.0 78.1 44.6 22.1 LnGrp LOS E D D E E D E D F E D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1842 901 2512 2820
Approach Delay, s/veh 56.2 59.3 65.8 44.8
Approach LOS E E E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.0 34.5 21.2 39.2 19.2 39.3 39.0 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 30.0 24.3 28.2 14.7 34.8 34.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.5 32.0 15.8 25.5 15.3 36.8 35.8 16.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 55.6
HCM 6th LOS E
2559
Lanes and Geometrics Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1600 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 1700 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 50 50 190 235 585 150 500 50
Storage Lanes 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 4202 1863 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 4202 1863 1583 3072 3539 1583 3072 6408 1583 3072 6408 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 95 155 125 55
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 411 496 902 1114
Travel Time (s) 9.3 11.3 20.5 25.3
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
2560
Volume Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Traffic Volume (vph) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Future Volume (vph) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr)
Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 Intersection Summary
2561
Timings Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Future Volume (vph) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 7
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 3 1 6 7
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 38.0 35.1 35.1 25.4 22.5 22.5 17.8 40.5 25.4 19.0 41.7 38.0 Total Split (%) 31.7% 29.3% 29.3% 21.2% 18.8% 18.8% 14.8% 33.8% 21.2% 15.8% 34.8% 31.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None None Min None Act Effct Green (s) 33.5 31.5 31.5 20.0 18.0 18.0 13.3 36.0 60.5 14.5 37.2 75.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.30 0.50 0.12 0.31 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.70 0.40 0.81 0.98 0.42 0.93 1.07 0.74 1.24 0.81 1.19 Control Delay 49.9 49.3 21.5 61.7 85.8 10.7 87.0 81.6 24.4 171.6 41.9 117.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.9 49.3 21.5 61.7 85.8 10.7 87.0 81.6 24.4 171.6 41.9 117.1

LOS D D C E F B F F C F D F
Approach Delay 46.2 65.9 70.1 87.9
Approach LOS D E E F
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.24
Intersection Signal Delay: 71.9 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 2562
Queues Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.70 0.40 0.81 0.98 0.42 0.93 1.07 0.74 1.24 0.81 1.19 Control Delay 49.9 49.3 21.5 61.7 85.8 10.7 87.0 81.6 24.4 171.6 41.9 117.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.9 49.3 21.5 61.7 85.8 10.7 87.0 81.6 24.4 171.6 41.9 117.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 264 245 63 160 213 0 126 ~510 301 ~227 330 ~1108 Queue Length 95th (ft) 321 354 133 #222 #328 60 #214 #586 454 #333 378 #1372 Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 416 822 1034
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50 190 235 585 150 500 50
Base Capacity (vph) 1173 489 485 535 530 369 340 1922 871 371 1986 1012 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.86 0.70 0.40 0.78 0.98 0.42 0.93 1.07 0.73 1.24 0.81 1.19 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
2563
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development TIS (JN:2957-2021-01) 14: Milliken Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps/Ontario Mills Parkway 09/15/2021 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions - With Improvements Synchro 10 Report Saturday Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Future Volume (veh/h) 941 320 182 388 484 144 294 1907 589 427 1489 1117 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1575 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 1673 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1116 493 418 475 544 243 350 1971 729 382 2037 920 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 4230 1870 1585 3092 3554 1585 3092 6434 1585 3092 6434 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1012 344 196 417 520 155 316 2051 633 459 1601 1201 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1410 1870 1585 1546 1777 1585 1546 1609 1585 1546 1609 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 27.2 19.5 12.2 15.5 17.1 10.8 11.9 36.0 36.0 14.5 26.6 37.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 27.2 19.5 12.2 15.5 17.1 10.8 11.9 36.0 36.0 14.5 26.6 37.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1116 493 418 475 544 243 350 1971 729 382 2037 920 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.70 0.47 0.88 0.96 0.64 0.90 1.04 0.87 1.20 0.79 1.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1206 493 418 550 544 243 350 1971 729 382 2037 920 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.9 39.1 36.4 48.7 49.4 46.7 51.5 40.8 28.5 51.5 36.5 24.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.6 4.3 0.8 13.6 27.6 5.5 25.6 31.7 10.9 113.8 2.1 145.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.4 9.5 4.8 6.9 9.6 4.6 5.8 18.4 17.7 11.6 10.6 60.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.4 43.4 37.2 62.3 77.0 52.2 77.0 72.4 39.4 165.3 38.6 170.0 LnGrp LOS D D D E E D E F D F D F
Approach Vol, veh/h 1552 1092 3000 3261
Approach Delay, s/veh 47.8 67.8 66.0 104.8
Approach LOS D E E F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.0 40.5 22.5 35.5 17.8 41.7 35.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.5 36.0 20.9 30.6 13.3 37.2 33.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.5 38.0 17.5 21.5 13.9 39.2 29.2 19.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.9 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 77.3
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
User approved changes to right turn type.
2564
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix B

APPENDIX B

AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS

IMPACT STUDY
2565
group, inc.
engineering

TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACT STUDY
City of Ontario
2566
BE:/rk16669.doc
JN:2957-2021-03

TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACT STUDY
City of Ontario, California
Prepared for:

Mr. Robert Montano

ADEPT DEVELOPMENT
388 Cordova Street, Suite 280
Pasadena, CA 91101
Prepared by:

RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Bryan Estrada, AICP, PTP
Darshan Shivaiah, M.S
June 4, 2021
2567
Table of Contents
Section Page

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 Site Location 1-1

1.2 Project Description 1-1

1.3 Sensitive Receptors 1-2

1.4 Summary of Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impacts 1-3

1.5 Recommended Design Features 1-4

2.0 Air Quality Setting .................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Description of Air Pollutants 2-1

2.2 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards 2-4

2.3 Attainment Status 2-6

2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2-7

2.4.1 SCAQMD Rules and Regulations 2-8

2.5 Local Climate and Meteorology 2-9

2.6 Local Air Quality 2-10

3.0 Global Climate Change Setting ............................................................... 3-1

3.1 Greenhouse Gases 3-2

3.2 GHG Regulatory Setting – State of California 3-4

3.3 GHG Emissions Inventory 3-4

4.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions ................................................. 4-1

4.1 Construction Assumptions 4-1

4.2 Operational Assumptions 4-2

4.2.1 Mobile Source Emissions 4-2

5.0 Significance Thresholds............................................................................ 5-1

5.1 Air Quality Regional Significance Thresholds 5-1

5.3 City of Ontario General Plan 5-1

5.4 City of Ontario Community Climate Action Plan 5-2

6.0 Air Quality Impact Analysis ...................................................................... 6-1

6.1 Short-Term Air Quality Impacts - Construction 6-1

6.1.1 Regional Emissions - Construction 6-1

6.1.2 Fugitive Dust - Construction 6-3

6.1.3 Odors - Construction 6-4

6.1.4 Asbestos - Construction 6-4

6.1.5 Diesel Particulate Matter - Construction 6-5
2568
Table of Contents (continued)
Section Page

6.2 Long Terms Air Quality Impacts - Operation 6-7

6.2.1 Daily Emissions - Operation 6-7

6.2.2 Odors – Operation 6-9

6.2.3 Toxic Air Contaminants – Operation 6-10

6.3 Health Impacts from Air Quality Exceedances 6-10

6.4 SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan Consistency 6-11

6.4.1 Criteria 1 – Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations 6-12

6.4.2 Criteria 2 – Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP 6-12

7.0 Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis ............................................................ 7-1

2569
List of Attachments
Exhibits
Location Map ........................................................................................................... A Site Plan ................................................................................................................... B Tables
Land Use Summary ................................................................................................... 1 CEQA Air Quality Impact Criteria ............................................................................... 2 CEQA GHG Impact Criteria ........................................................................................ 3 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) .......................................... 4 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status ................................................................... 5 Meteorological Summary .......................................................................................... 6 Local Air Quality ....................................................................................................... 7 Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases ........................................................ 8 GHG Emissions Inventory .......................................................................................... 9 Trip Generation Rates ............................................................................................... 10 Operational Vehicle Miles Traveled ............................................................................ 11 SCAQMD Regional Significance Air Quality Thresholds ............................................... 12 Daily Construction Emissions ..................................................................................... 13 Daily Operational Emissions ...................................................................................... 14 Appendices
Daily Emission Calculations Outputs (CalEEMod) ....................................................... A Community Climate Action Plan Screening Tables ...................................................... B 2570
1-1

1.0 Introduction
The purpose of this air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) impact study is to determine whether the estimated criteria air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions generated from the construction and operation of the proposed Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development (hereinafter referred to as project) would cause significant impacts to air resources.

This assessment was conducted within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.). The methodology follows the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and City of Ontario recommendations for quantification of emissions and evaluation of potential impacts.

1.1 Site Location

The proposed project site is located adjacent to the Toyota Arena, north of Concourse Street and south of Fourth Street, in the City of Ontario.

The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), the SCAQMD San Bernardino Valley General Forecast Area, and the Southwest San Bernardino Valley Air Monitoring Area-33.

The project site is located within the Ontario Center Specific Plan and zoned for Urban Commercial use. The City of Ontario General Plan land use map designates the project site as Mixed Use.

The project location map is provided in Exhibit A.

1.2 Project Description
The project consists of construction and operation of a mixed use town center development with residential and commercial/retail land use within four development lots.

The proposed project includes a total of 691 residential dwelling units, 71,200 square feet of commercial/retail uses and the demolition and relocation of approximately 1,170 surface parking spaces. The total project site area is approximately 18.73 acres.

The site plan used for this analysis, provided by the applicant, is illustrated in Exhibit B.

Table 1 summarizes the land use assumptions used for this analysis. 2571
1-2
Table 1
Land Use Summary
Lot Dwelling Units Retail (SF)1 Parking Spaces
A 359 25,256 4772
B 98 20,802 1302
C 107 11,047 1422
D 127 14,095 1702
E & F -- -- 1,170
Total 691 71,200 2,089
1 S.F. – Square Feet
2 Parking Structure
Construction of the project is estimated to begin in the year 2021 and last approximately 21 months. Construction activities are expected to consist of demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The project is expected to demolish an existing asphalt surface parking lot of approximately 7.48 acres within Lot A and Lot B.

The project is not expected to require the import or export of earthwork materials; preliminary grading estimates show a balanced site. The project is expected to be operational in the year 2023.

1.3 Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive receptors are considered land uses or other types of population groups that are more sensitive to air pollution exposure. Sensitive population groups include children, the elderly, the acutely and chronically ill, and those with cardio-respiratory diseases. For CEQA purposes, the SCAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be a location where a sensitive individual could remain for 24-hours or longer, such as residences, hospitals, and schools (etc), as described in the Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (SCAQMD 2008a, page 3-2).

The nearest sensitive land uses to the project site include the following:
2572
1-3
 Existing residential dwelling units located approximately 150 feet north of Lot G, across Fourth Street.
 Existing residential dwelling units located approximately 475 feet to the west of Lot F.

1.4 Summary of Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impacts
Table 2 provides a summary of the CEQA air quality impact analysis results.

Table 2
CEQA Air Quality Impact Criteria
Air Quality Impact Criteria Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Conflict with, or obstruct implementation of, the
applicable air quality plan? X
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is in non-attainment under an applicable
Federal or State ambient air quality standard?
X
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? X
e) Result in other emissions (such as those leading
to odors) adversely affecting a substantial
number of people?
X
Table 3 provides a summary of the CEQA GHG impact criteria analysis results. 2573
1-4
Table 3
CEQA GHG Impact Criteria
GHG Impact Criteria Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
X
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
emissions of greenhouse gases?
X

1.5 Recommended Design Features
This section provides a summary of the recommended design features that are expected to be included as part of the project description and design and have been identified to help reduce the project’s impact from air quality and GHG emissions. The recommended project design features include several standard rules and requirements, best practices, and common project design features for reducing air quality emissions.

Construction Design Features:

DF-1 Prepare and implement a Construction Management Plan which will include Best Available Control Measures to be submitted to the City of Ontario.

DF-2 Follow the standard SCAQMD rules and requirements with regards to fugitive dust control, which includes, but are not limited to the following:

1. All active construction areas shall be watered two (2) times daily.

2. Speed on unpaved roads shall be reduced to less than 15 mph.

3. Any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway shall be swept or washed at the site access points within 30 minutes.

4. Any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material shall be covered or watered twice daily.

5. All operations on any unpaved surface shall be suspended if winds exceed 15 mph.

6. Access points shall be washed or swept daily.

7. Construction sites shall be sandbagged for erosion control. 2574
1-5

8. Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers’ specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more).

9. Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, and maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard space in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114.

10. Pave or gravel construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road and use gravel aprons at truck exits.

11. Replace the ground cover of disturbed areas as quickly possible.

12. A fugitive dust control plan should be prepared and submitted to SCAQMD prior to the start of construction.

DF-4 Construction equipment shall be maintained in proper tune.

DF-5 All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five (5) minutes or longer.

DF-6 Minimize the simultaneous operation of multiple construction equipment units.

DF-7 The use of heavy construction equipment and earthmoving activity shall be suspended during Air Alerts when the Air Quality Index reaches the “Unhealthy” level.

DF-8 Establish an electricity supply to the construction site and use electric powered equipment instead of diesel-powered equipment or generators, where feasible.

DF-9 Utilize zero VOC and low VOC paints and solvents, wherever possible.

Operational Design Features:

DF-10 Implement the GHG Reduction Measures from the Ontario County Climate Action Plan (CAP) Screening Tables to achieve at least 100 points, per the requirements for Mixed Use Projects.
2575
1-6
DF-11 Comply with the mandatory requirements of California Building Standards Code Title 24 Part 6 (Energy Code) and Title 24 Part 11 (CAL Green).

DF-12 Implement water conservation strategies, including low flow fixtures and toilets, water efficient irrigation systems, drought tolerant/native landscaping, and limit the amount of turf/sod, per CAL Green and City of Ontario requirements.

DF-13 Implement zero waste strategies, recycling and composting programs for residential and non-residential uses.

DF-14 Encourage residents and landscape maintenance crews to use electric landscaping equipment, such as lawn mowers and leaf blowers, wherever feasible.

DF-15 No natural gas or wood burning fireplaces shall be installed in any residential dwelling.

DF-16 Implement trip reduction measures that reduce the number of auto-based trips and encourage the use of transit, bicycling, and walking. Such as;

1. Improve the walkability and design of the project by including pedestrian and bicycling connections within the project site and to adjacent off-site facilities (i.e. sidewalks, crosswalks, foot paths, protected bike lanes, multi-purpose trails, direct parcel-to-parcel connections, wayfinding signage, etc.).

2. Provide traffic calming measures (i.e. marked crosswalks, raised crosswalks, raised intersections, count-down signal timers, curb extensions, speed tables, median islands, tight corner radii, roundabouts or mini-circles, on-street parking, planter strips with street trees, chicanes/chokers, etc.)

3. Provide bicycle racks for the retail and commercial uses and secure bicycle parking areas for the office and residential uses.

DF-17 Provide electric vehicle charging stations per the requirements of CALGreen. 2576
2-1

2.0 Air Quality Setting
The Federal Clean Air Act (§ 7602) defines air pollution as any agent or combination of such agents, including any physical, chemical, biological, or radioactive substance which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air. Household combustion devices, motor vehicles, industrial facilities and forest fires are common sources of air pollution. Air pollution can cause disease, allergies and even death. It affects soil, water, crops, vegetation, manmade materials, animals, wildlife, weather, visibility, and climate. It can also cause damage to and deterioration of property, present hazards to transportation, and negatively impact the economy.

This section provides background information on criteria air pollutants, the applicable federal, state and local regulations concerning air pollution, and the existing physical setting of the project within the context of local air quality.

2.1 Description of Air Pollutants1.

The following section describes the air pollutants of concern related to the project. Criteria air pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the federal and state governments have established air quality standards for outdoor or ambient concentrations to protect public health. The following descriptions of criteria air pollutants have been provided by the SCAQMD.
 Carbon Monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless, toxic gas produced by incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels (e.g., gasoline, diesel fuel, and biomass).

Sources include motor vehicle exhaust, industrial processes (metals processing and chemical manufacturing), residential wood burning, and natural sources. CO is somewhat soluble in water; therefore, rainfall and fog can suppress CO conditions.

CO enters the body through the lungs, dissolves in the blood, and competes with oxygen, often replacing it in the blood, thus reducing the blood's ability to transport oxygen to vital organs in the body. The ambient air quality standard for carbon monoxide is intended to protect persons whose medical condition already compromises their circulatory system's ability to deliver oxygen. These medical conditions include certain heart ailments, chronic lung diseases, and anemia. Persons with these conditions have reduced exercise capacity even when exposed to relatively low levels of CO. Fetuses are at risk because their blood has an even greater affinity to bind with CO. Smokers are also at risk from ambient CO levels because smoking 1 SCAQMD. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning (May 6, 2005)
2577
2-2
increases the background level of CO in their blood. The South Coast basin has recently achieved attainment status for carbon monoxide by both USEPA and CARB.

 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) is a byproduct of fuel combustion. The principal form of nitrogen oxide produced by combustion is nitric oxide (NO), but NO reacts quickly to form NO2, creating the mixture of NO and NO2 commonly called NOx. NO2 acts as an acute irritant and, in equal concentrations, is more injurious than NO. At atmospheric concentrations, however, NO2 is only potentially irritating. There is some indication of a relationship between NO2 and chronic pulmonary fibrosis. Some increase in bronchitis in young children has also been observed at concentrations below 0.3 parts per million (ppm). NO2 absorbs blue light which results in a brownish red cast to the atmosphere and reduced visibility. Although NO2 concentrations have not exceeded national standards since 1991 and the state hourly standard since 1993, NOx emissions remain of concern because of their contribution to the formation of O3 and particulate matter.

 Ozone (O3) is one of several substances called photochemical oxidants that are formed when volatile organic compounds (VOC) and NOx react in the presence of ultraviolet sunlight. O3 concentrations in the South Coast basin are typically among the highest in the nation, and the damaging effects of photochemical smog, which is a popular name for a number of oxidants in combination, are generally related to the concentrations of O3. Individuals exercising outdoors, children, and people with preexisting lung disease, such as asthma and chronic pulmonary lung disease, are considered to be the subgroups most susceptible to O3 effects. Short-term exposures (lasting for a few hours) to O3 at levels typically observed in southern California can result in breathing pattern changes, reduction of breathing capacity, increased susceptibility to infections, inflammation of the lung tissue, and some immunological changes. In recent years, a correlation between elevated ambient O3 levels and increases in daily hospital admission rates, as well as mortality, has also been reported. The South Coast Air Basin is designated by the USEPA as an extreme nonattainment area for ozone. Although O3 concentrations have declined substantially since the early 1990s, the South Coast basin continues to have peak O3 levels that exceed both state and federal standards.
 Fine Particulate Matter (PM10) consists of extremely small, suspended particles or droplets 10 microns or smaller in diameter that can lodge in the lungs, contributing to respiratory problems. PM10 arises from such sources as re-entrained road dust, diesel soot, combustion products, tire and brake abrasion, construction operations, and fires. It is also formed in the atmosphere from NOx and SO2 reactions with ammonia. PM10 scatters light and significantly reduces visibility. Inhalable particulates 2578
2-3
pose a serious health hazard, alone or in combination with other pollutants. More than half of the smallest particles inhaled will be deposited in the lungs and can cause permanent lung damage. Inhalable particulates can also have a damaging effect on health by interfering with the body’s mechanism for clearing the respiratory tract or by acting as a carrier of an absorbed toxic substance. The South Coast basin has recently achieved federal attainment status for PM10, but is non-attainment based on state requirements.
 Ultra-Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) is defined as particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 microns and is a subset of PM10. PM2.5 consists mostly of products from the reaction of NOx and SO2 with ammonia, secondary organics, finer dust particles, and the combustion of fuels, including diesel soot. PM2.5 can cause exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patients with respiratory or cardiovascular disease, declines in pulmonary function growth in children, and increased risk of premature death from heart or lung diseases in the elderly. Daily fluctuations in PM2.5 levels have been related to hospital admissions for acute respiratory conditions, school absences, and increased medication use in children and adults with asthma. The South Coast basin is designated as non-attainment for PM2.5 by both federal and state standards.
 Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, pungent gas formed primarily by the combustion of sulfur-containing fossil fuels. Health effects include acute respiratory symptoms and difficulty in breathing for children. Individuals with asthma may experience constriction of airways with exposure to SO2. Though SO2 concentrations have been reduced to levels well below state and federal standards, further reductions in SO2 emissions are needed because SO2 is a precursor to sulfate and PM10. The South Coast basin is considered a SO2 attainment area by USEPA and CARB.  Lead (Pb) is a toxic heavy metal that can be emitted into the air through some industrial processes, burning of leaded gasoline and past use of lead-based consumer products. Lead is a neurotoxin that accumulates in soft tissues and bones, damages the nervous system, and causes blood disorders. It is particularly problematic in children, in that permanent brain damage may result, even if blood levels are promptly normalized with treatment. Concentrations of lead once exceeded the state and federal air quality standards by a wide margin, but as a result of the removal of lead from motor vehicle gasoline, ambient air quality standards for lead have not been exceeded since 1982. Though special monitoring sites immediately downwind of lead sources recorded localized violations of the state standard in 1994, no violations have been recorded since. Consequently, the South Coast basin is designated as an attainment area for lead by both the USEPA and CARB. This report 2579
2-4
does not analyze lead emissions from the project, as it is not expected to emit lead in any significant measurable quantity.
 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), although not actually a criteria air pollutant, VOCs are regulated by the SCAQMD because they cause chemical reactions which contribute to the formation of ozone. VOCs are also transformed into organic aerosols in the atmosphere, contributing to higher PM10 and lower visibility levels.

Sources of VOCs include combustion engines, and evaporative emissions associated with fuel, paints and solvents, asphalt paving, and the use of household consumer products such as aerosols. Although health-based standards have not been established for VOCs, health effects can occur from exposures to high concentrations of VOC. Some hydrocarbon components classified as VOC emissions are hazardous air pollutants. Benzene, for example, is a hydrocarbon component of VOC emissions that are known to be a human carcinogen. The term reactive organic gases (ROG) are often used interchangeably with VOC.
 Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) are defined as air pollutants which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or serious illness, or which may pose a hazard to human health, and for which there is no concentration that does not present some risk. This contrasts with the criteria pollutants, in that there is no threshold level for TAC exposure below which adverse health impacts are not expected to occur. The majority of the estimated health risk from TACs can be attributed to a relatively few compounds, the most common being diesel particulate matter (DPM) from diesel engine exhaust. In addition to DPM, benzene and 1,3-butadiene are also significant contributors to overall ambient public health risk in California.

2.2 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards
The Federal Clean Air Act, which was last amended in 1990, requires the EPA to set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for criteria pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment. The State of California has also established additional and more stringent California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) in addition to the seven criteria pollutants designated by the federal government.

AAQS are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The standards are divided into two categories, primary standards, and secondary standards. Primary standards are implemented to provide protection for the “sensitive” populations such as those with asthma, or the children and elderly. Secondary standards are to provide protection against visible pollution as well as damage to the surrounding environment, including animals, crops, and buildings. 2580
2-5
Table 4 shows the Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Table 4
Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS)1 Air Pollutant Averaging Time 2 Federal Standard
(NAAQS)2
California Standard
(CAAQS)2
Ozone
1 Hour -- 0.09 ppm
8 Hour 0.070 ppm 0.070 ppm
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
1 Hour 35 ppm 20 ppm
8 Hour 9 ppm 9 ppm
Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2)
1 Hour 0.100 ppm 0.18 ppm
Annual 0.053 ppm 0.030 ppm
Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2)
1 Hour 0.075 ppm 0.25 ppm
3 Hour 0.5 ppm3 --
24 Hour -- 0.04 ppm
Particulate Matter
(PM10)
24 Hour 150 μg/m³ 50 μg/m³
Mean -- 20 μg/m³
Particulate Matter
(PM2.5)
24 Hour 35 μg/m³ --
Annual 12 μg/m³ 12 μg/m³
Lead
30-day -- 1.5 μg/m
Quarter 1.5 μg/m --
3-month average 0.15 μg/m --
Visibility reducing
particles 8 Hour -- 0.23/km extinction coefficient. (10-mile visibility standard) Sulfates 24 Hour -- 25 μg/m
Vinyl chloride 24 Hour -- 0.01 ppm
Hydrogen sulfide 24 Hour -- 0.03 ppm
1 Source: USEPA: https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table and CARB: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/california-ambient-air-quality-standards 2 ppm = parts per million of air, by volume; μg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; Annual = Annual Arithmetic Mean; 30-day = 30-day average; Quarter = Calendar quarter. 3 Secondary standards
2581
2-6
Several pollutants listed in Table 4 are not addressed in this analysis. Lead is not included because the project is not anticipated to emit lead. Visibility-reducing particles are not explicitly addressed in this analysis because particulate matter is addressed. The project is not expected to generate or be exposed to vinyl chloride because proposed project uses do not utilize the chemical processes that create this pollutant and there are no such uses in the project vicinity. The proposed project is not expected to cause exposure to hydrogen sulfide because it would not generate hydrogen sulfide in any substantial quantity.

2.3 Attainment Status
The Clean Air Act requires states to prepare a State Implementation Plan (SIP) to ensure air quality meets the NAAQS. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) provides designations of attainment for air basins where AAQS are either met or exceeded. If the AAQS are met, the area is designated as being in “attainment”, if the air pollutant concentrations exceed the AAQS, than the area is designated as being “nonattainment”. If there is inadequate or inconclusive data to make a definitive attainment designation, the area is considered “unclassified.”
National nonattainment areas are further designated as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, or extreme as a function of deviation from standards. Each standard has a different definition, or ‘form’ of what constitutes attainment, based on specific air quality statistics.

For example, the Federal 8-hour CO standard is not to be exceeded more than once per year; therefore, an area is in attainment of the CO standard if no more than one 8-hour ambient air monitoring values exceeds the threshold per year. In contrast, the federal annual PM2.5 standard is met if the three-year average of the annual average PM2.5 concentration is less than or equal to the standard.

When a state submits a request to the EPA to re-designate a nonattainment area to attainment, the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A(a) requires that the state (or states, if the area is a multi-state area) submit a maintenance plan ensuring the area can maintain the air quality standard for which the area is to be re-designated for at least 10 years following the effective date of re-designation.

Table 5 lists the attainment status for the criteria pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB).
2582
2-7
Table 5
South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status1
Pollutant State Status National Status
Ozone Nonattainment Nonattainment (Extreme)2
Carbon monoxide Attainment
Attainment
(Maintenance)
Nitrogen dioxide Attainment
Attainment
(Maintenance)
PM10 Nonattainment
Attainment
(Maintenance)
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
Lead Attainment Nonattainment (Partial)3
1 Source: California Air Resources Board. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm 2 8-Hour Ozone.
3 Partial Nonattainment designation – Los Angeles County portion of Basin only.

2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The agency responsible for air pollution control for the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) is the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationary sources. SCAQMD maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the SCAB. SCAQMD, in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments, is also responsible for developing, updating, and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SCAB. An AQMP is a plan prepared and implemented by an air pollution district for a county or region designated as nonattainment of the federal and/or California ambient air quality standards. The term nonattainment area is used to refer to an air SCAB where one or more ambient air quality standards are exceeded.

The latest version is the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP is a regional blueprint for achieving the federal air quality standards and healthful air. While air quality has dramatically improved over the years, the SCAB still exceeds federal public health standards for both ozone and particulate matter (PM) and experiences some of the worst air pollution in the nation. The 2016 AQMP includes both stationary and mobile source strategies to ensure that rapidly approaching attainment deadlines are met, that public health is protected to the maximum extent feasible, and that the region is not faced with burdensome sanctions if the Plan is not approved or if the NAAQS are not met on time.

According to the 2016 AQMP, the most significant air quality challenge in the SCAB is to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions sufficiently to meet the upcoming ozone standard deadlines. Based on the inventory and modeling results, 522 tons per day (tpd) of total 2583
2-8
SCAB NOx 2012 emissions are projected to drop to 255 tpd and 214 tpd in the 8-hour ozone attainment years of 2023 and 2031 respectively, due to continued implementation of already adopted regulatory actions (“baseline emissions”). The analysis suggests that total SCAB emissions of NOx must be reduced to approximately 141 tpd in 2023 and 96 tpd in 2031 to attain the 8-hour ozone standards. This represents an additional 45 percent reduction in NOx in 2023, and an additional 55 percent NOx reduction beyond 2031 levels.2

2.4.1 SCAQMD Rules and Regulations
The SCAQMD establishes a program of rules and regulations to obtain attainment of the state and federal standards in conjunction with the AQMP. Several of the rules and regulations that may be applicable to this project include, but are not limited to, the following:
 SCAQMD Rule 402 prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.
 SCAQMD Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction and operation activities. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Management Practices, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites.  SCAQMD Rule 445 restricts wood burning devices from being installed into any new development and is intended to reduce the emissions of particulate matter for wood burning devices.
 SCAQMD Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coating and limits the VOC content in paints and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paints available during construction. Therefore, all paints and 2 SCAQMD. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-airplans/air-quality-mgt-plan/final-2016-aqmp 2584
2-9
solvents used during construction and operation of project must comply with Rule 1113.
 SCAQMD Rule 1143 governs the manufacture, sale, and use of paint thinners and solvents used in thinning of coating materials, cleaning of coating application equipment, and other solvent cleaning operations by limiting their VOC content.

This rule regulates the VOC content of solvents used during construction. Solvents used during the construction phase must comply with this rule.  SCAQMD Rule 1186 limits the presence of fugitive dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets certification protocols and requirements for street sweepers that are under contract to provide sweeping services to any federal, state, county, agency or special district such as water, air, sanitation, transit, or school district.

2.5 Local Climate and Meteorology
The project is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). Climatological data from the nearest weather station to the project site is summarized in Table 6.

Table 6
Meteorological Summary1
Month Temperature (˚F) Mean Precipitation
(inches) Max. Min. Mean
January 66.8 44.0 55.5 3.65
February 69.4 45.0 57.2 2.85
March 70.1 46.3 58.2 2.80
April 74.5 48.4 61.5 1.13
May 79.9 52.6 66.2 0.26
June 86.7 56.6 71.7 0.04
July 95.0 62.2 78.6 0.01
August 94.4 62.9 78.7 0.11
September 91.3 61.3 76.3 0.34
October 83.0 55.4 69.2 0.34
November 73.6 48.5 61.0 1.72
December 68.3 44.4 56.3 2.07
Annual 79.4 52.3 65.9 15.32
1 Source: Western Regional Climate Center 2012. Averages derived from measurements recorded from 1951 to 1984 at Fontana Kaiser Station No. 043120.
2585
2-10

2.6 Local Air Quality
The air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air basin. Estimates of the existing emissions in the Basin provided in the Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan, prepared by SCAQMD, March 2017, indicate that collectively, mobile sources account for 60 percent of the VOC, 90 percent of the NOx emissions, 95 percent of the CO emissions and 34 percent of directly emitted PM2.5, with another 13 percent of PM2.5 from road dust.

The SCAQMD has divided the SCAB into fourteen general forecasting areas and thirty eight Source Receptor Areas (SRA) for monitoring and reporting local air quality. The SCAQMD provides daily reports of the current air quality conditions in each general forecast area and SRA. The monitoring areas provide a general representation of the local meteorological, terrain, and air quality conditions within the SCAB.

The project is located within the San Bernardino Valley general forecasting area and Southwest San Bernardino Valley (SRA-33). The Southwest San Bernardino Valley has been divided into two (2) regions; I-10 Near Road and CA-60 Near Road. Due to the close proximity of the project site to the I-10 Road, published air quality monitoring data has been used from this location.

Table 7 summarizes the published air quality monitoring for the most recent 3-year period available. These pollutant levels were used to comprise a “background” for the project location and existing local air quality. For criteria pollutants not monitored near the site, data from the nearest monitoring station with a comparable setting were used. 2586
2-11
Table 7
Local Air Quality
Air Pollutant
Location
Averaging
Time Item 2017 2018 2019
Carbon
Monoxide
--
I-10 Near Road
1 Hour
Max 1-Hour (ppm) 4.2 1.6 1.5
Exceeded State Standard (20 ppm) No No No
Exceeded National Standard (35 ppm) No No No
8 Hour
Max 8 Hour (ppm) 1.3 1.3 1.1
Exceeded State Standard (9 ppm) No No No
Exceeded National Standard (9 ppm) No No No
Ozone
--
Central San
Bernardino Valley-1
1 Hour Max 1-Hour (ppm) 0.137 0.141 0.124
Days > State Standard (0.09 ppm) 33 38 41
8 Hour
Max 8 Hour (ppm) 0.118 0.116 0.114
Days > State Standard (0.07 ppm) 49 69 67
Days >National Standard (0.070 ppm) 49 69 67
Nitrogen Dioxide
--
I-10 Near Road
1 Hour Max 1-Hour (ppm) 0.086 0.0883 0.0863
Exceeded State Standard (0.18 ppm) No No No
Annual
Annual Average (ppm) 0.0288 0.0272 0.0276
Exceeded >State Standard (0.030 ppm) No No No
Exceeded >National Standard (0.053 ppm) No No No
Sulfur Dioxide
--
Central San
Bernardino Valley-1
1 Hour
Max 1 Hour (ppm) 0.0039 0.0029 0.0024
Exceed State Standard (0.25 ppm) No No No
Exceed National Standard (0.075 ppm) No No No
Coarse Particles
(PM10)
--
Central San
Bernardino Valley-1
24 Hour
Max 24-Hour (μg/m³) 75 64 88
Days > State Standard (50 μg/m³) 2 9 12
Days >National Standard (150 μg/m³) 0 0 0
Annual Annual Average (μg/m³) 39.3 34.1 34.8
Exceeded State Standard (20 μg/m³) Yes Yes Yes
Fine Particulates
(PM2.5)
--
Central San
Bernardino Valley-1
24 Hour
Max 24-Hour (μg/m³) 39.2 29.2 46.5
Days >National Standard (35 μg/m³) 1 0 2
Annual
Annual Average (μg/m³) 12.04 11.13 10.84
Exceeded State Standard (12 μg/m³) No No No
Exceeded National Standard (15 μg/m³) No No No
Source : https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/historical-air-quality-data/historical-data-by-year μg/m³ = micrograms per cubic meter
ARB = California Air Resource Board
EPA= Environmental Protection Agency
ppm = part per million
(- -) = Data not provided
2587
3-1

3.0 Global Climate Change Setting
Global climate change is the change in the average weather of the earth that is measured by such things as alterations in temperature, wind patterns, storms, and precipitation.

Current data shows that the recent period of warming is occurring more rapidly than past geological events. The average global surface temperature has increased by approximately

1.4° Fahrenheit since the early 20th Century. 1.4° Fahrenheit may seem like a small change, but it's an unusual event in Earth's recent history, and as we are seeing, even small changes in temperature can cause enormous changes in the environment.

The planet’s climate record, preserved in tree rings, ice cores, and coral reefs, shows that the global average temperature has been stable over long periods of time. For example, at the end of the last ice age, when the Northeast United States was covered by more than 3,000 feet of ice, average global temperatures were only 5° to 9° Fahrenheit cooler than today. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which includes more than 1,300 scientists from the United States and other countries, forecasts a temperature rise of

2.5° to 10° Fahrenheit over the next century. Therefore, significant changes to the environment are expected in the near future.

The consequences of global climate change include more frequent and severe weather, worsening air pollution by increasing ground level ozone, higher rates of plant and animal extinction, more acidic and oxygen depleted oceans, strain on food and water resources, and threats to densely populated coastal and low lying areas from sea level rise.

The impacts of climate change are already visible in the Southwest United States. In California, the consequences of climate change include;  A rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of coastal businesses and residencies
 A reduction in the quality and supply of water from the Sierra snowpack  Increased risk of large wildfires
 Exacerbation of air quality problems
 Reductions in the quality and quantity of agricultural products  An increased temperature and extreme weather events
 A decrease in the health and productivity of California’s forests 2588
3-2

3.1 Greenhouse Gases
GHGs comprise less than 0.1 percent of the total atmospheric composition, yet they play an essential role in influencing climate. Greenhouse gases include naturally occurring compounds such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), water vapor (H2O), and nitrous oxide (N2O), while others are synthetic. Man-made GHGs include the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and Perfluorocarbons (PFCs), as well as sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Different GHGs have different effects on the Earth's warming. GHGs differ from each other in their ability to absorb energy (their "radiative efficiency") and how long they stay in the atmosphere, also known as the "lifetime".

The Global Warming Potential (GWP) was developed to allow comparisons of the global warming impacts of different gases. Specifically, it is a measure of how much energy the emissions of 1 ton of a gas will absorb over a given period of time, relative to the emissions of 1 ton of CO2. The larger the GWP, the more that a given gas warms the Earth compared to CO2 over that time period. The time period usually used for GWPs is 100 years. GWPs provide a common unit of measure, which allows analysts to add up emissions estimates of different gases and allows policymakers to compare emissions reduction opportunities across sectors and gases.

Table 8 lists the 100-year GWP of GHGs from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fifth assessment report (AR5).
2589
3-3
Table 8
Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases1, 2
Gas Name Formula Lifetime (years) GWP
Carbon Dioxide CO2 1
Methane CH4 12 28
Nitrous Oxide N2O 114 265
Sulphur Hexafluoride SF6 3200 23,500
Nitrogen Trifluoride NF3 740 16,100
Hexafluoroethane (PFC-116) C2F6 10,000 11,100
Octafluoropropane (PFC-218) C3F8 2,600 8,900
Octafluorocyclobutane (PFC-318) C4F8 3,200 9,540
Tetrafluoromethane (PFC-14) CF4 50,000 6,630
Hydrofluorocarbon 125 HFC-125 29 3,170
Hydrofluorocarbon 134a HFC-134a 14 1,300
Hydrofluorocarbon 143a HFC-143a 52 4,800
Hydrofluorocarbon 152a HFC-152a 1 138
Hydrofluorocarbon 227ea HFC-227ea 34 3,350
Hydrofluorocarbon 23 HFC-23 270 12,400
Hydrofluorocarbon 236fa HFC-236fa 240 8,060
Hydrofluorocarbon 245fa HFC-245fa 8 858
Hydrofluorocarbon 32 HFC-32 5 677
Hydrofluorocarbon 365mfc HFC-365mfc 9 804
Hydrofluorocarbon 43-10mee HFC-43-10mee 16 1,650
1 Source: IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_Chapter08_FINAL.pdf 2 GWPs are used to convert GHG emission values to "carbon dioxide equivalent" (CO2e) units

3.2 GHG Regulatory Setting – State of California
The State of California has been a leader in climate change legislation and has passed numerous bills to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across all sectors of the economy.

Some of the key climate legislation in the State include the following:
2590
3-4
 Assembly Bill (AB) 32, California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 set the stage for the State’s transition to a sustainable, low-carbon future. AB 32 was the first program in the country to take a comprehensive, long-term approach to addressing climate change.3

 Senate Bill (SB) 375, Sustainable Communities & Climate Protection Act of 2008. SB 375 requires the Air Resources Board to develop regional greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for passenger vehicles GHG reduction targets for 2020 and 2035 for each region covered by the State's 18 metropolitan planning organizations.4
 Senate Bill (SB) 100, California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. SB 100 established a landmark policy requiring renewable energy and zero-carbon resources supply 100 percent of electric retail sales to end-use customers by 2045.5

3.3 GHG Emissions Inventory
Table 9 shows the latest GHG emission inventories at the national, state, regional and local levels.

Table 9
GHG Emissions Inventory1
United States
(2018)2
State of California
(2018)3
SCAG
(2020)4
City of Ontario
(2020)5
6,678 MMTCO2e 425 MMTCO2e 216.4 MMTCO2e 3.12 MMTCO2e
1 MMTCO2e = Million Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent 2 https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks 3 https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/pubs/reports/2000_2018/ghg_inventory_trends_00-18.pdf 4 http://www.scag.ca.gov/programs/Pages/GreenhouseGases.aspx 5 City of Ontario Community Climate Action Plan, November 2014. Estimated value. 3 California Air Resources Board. AB 32 Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/fact-sheets/ab-32-global-warming-solutions-act-2006 4 California Air Resources Board. Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Program. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/sustainable-communities-climate-protection-program/about 5 California Energy Commission. SB 100 Joint Agency Report. https://www.energy.ca.gov/sb100 2591
4-1

4.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions
The California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2020.4.0 (CalEEMod) was used to calculate criteria air pollutants and GHG emissions from the construction and operation of the project. CalEEMod is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions.

The model quantifies direct emissions from construction and operation activities (including vehicle use), as well as indirect emissions, such as GHG emissions from off-site energy generation, solid waste disposal, vegetation planting and/or removal, and water use. The model also identifies design features to reduce criteria pollutant and GHG emissions. The model was developed for the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) in collaboration with the California air districts.

4.1 Construction Assumptions
Construction of the project is estimated to begin in the year 2021 and last approximately 21 months. Construction activities are expected to consist of demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The project is expected to be operational in the year 2023. For purposes of this analysis, construction phases are not expected to overlap.

The project is expected to demolish an existing asphalt surface parking lot of approximately

7.48 acres within Lot A and Lot B. The project is not expected to require the import or export any earthwork material during grading phase; preliminary earthwork estimates show a balanced site.

Assumptions for off-road equipment usage, soil disturbance area, worker and vendor trips, paving, and architectural coatings utilize the CalEEMod defaults.

The project will be required to comply with several standard fugitive dust control measures, per SCAQMD Rule 403. The following key inputs are utilized in CalEEMod and are based upon data provided from SCAQMD6
:
 Utilize soil stabilizers - 30% PM10 and PM2.5 reduction. 6 SCAQMD. Fugitive Dust Mitigation Measures. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/airquality-analysis-handbook/mitigation-measures-and-control-efficiencies/fugitive-dust 2592
4-2
 Replace ground cover - 15% PM10 and PM2.5 reduction.
 Water exposed areas 2x per day.
 Unpaved road moisture content – 25%.
 Unpaved road vehicle speed – 15 mph.

4.2 Operational Assumptions
Operational emissions occur over the life of the project and are considered “long-term” sources of emissions. Operational emissions include both direct and indirect sources. This section briefly describes the operational sources of emissions analyzed for the project.

4.2.1 Mobile Source Emissions
Mobile source emissions are the largest source of long-term air pollutants from the operation of the project. Mobile sources are direct sources of project emissions that are primarily attributed to tailpipe exhaust and road dust (tire, brake, clutch, and road surface wear) from motor vehicles traveling to and from the site.

Estimates of mobile source emissions require information on four parameters: trip generation, trip length, vehicle/fleet mix, and emission factors (quantity of emission for each mile traveled or time spent idling by each vehicle).

The trip generation rates, trip length and trip percentages for this project are based on the latest version of the Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development Traffic Impact Study Scoping Agreement, by RK, May 2021 and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) VMT Tool7
.

The Emission Factors (EMFAC2017) 2017 model and off-model adjustments factors to account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule is used to estimate the mobile source emissions are embedded in the CalEEMod emissions model. No adjustments have been made to default emission factors.

The project’s total vehicle miles traveled estimated by CalEEMod is shown in the Table 10 for this project.
7 SBCTA VMT Screening Tool. https://devapps.fehrandpeers.com/sbctavmt/ 2593
4-3
Table 10
Operational Vehicle Miles Traveled
Land Use Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT)
Multifamily Mid-Rise1 5,682,657
Commercial/Retail Center 4,539,098
Total 10,221,754
1 The VMT estimates for residential home-based trips are based on estimates from the SBCTA VMT Tool, which shows daily home-based VMT per capita for TAZ 53690101 of 7.9 VMT per population for model year 2023.

The operational vehicle fleet mix has been adjusted to reflect vehicle types used for typical residential home-based trips and the commercial/retail and office trips generated by the project. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) regional travel demand model does not include heavy-duty trucks, buses or other large vehicles that would require passenger car equivalent (PCE) adjustments for residential home-based trips.

The project does not consist of land uses that would typically require PCE adjustments to account for large trucks, such as warehousing.

To be conservative, the Air Quality/GHG analysis has assumed that 2% of the total residential home-based trips and commercial/retail and office trips will include trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 10,000 pound or greater. This includes LHD2, MHD, HHD, OBUS, UBUS, and SBUS vehicles. The 2% mix is also consistent with the default Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) assumptions. The adjusted vehicle mix is proportioned according to the default CalEEMod vehicle mix.

Table 11 summarizes vehicle mix used for this project.
2594
4-4
Table 11
Vehicle Mix for Trips1
YUY Vehicle Mix (%)
Light Duty Automobile (LDA) 55.05%
Light Duty Truck (LDTI) 5.72%
Light Duty Truck (LDT2) 17.64%
Medium Duty Truck (MDV) 14.23%
Light Heavy Truck (LHD1) 2.76%
Light Heavy Truck (LHD2) 0.34%
Medium Heavy Truck (MHD) 0.53%
Heavy Heavy Truck (HHD) 0.81%
Other Bus (OBUS) 0.03%
Urban Bus (UBUS) 0.01%
Motorcycle (MCY) 2.59%
School Bus (SBUS) 0.04%
Motor Home (MH) 0.24%
Total 100.0%
1 Adjusted fleet mix to include 2% total trucks over 10,000 lbs GVWR. (LHD2, MHD, HHD, OBUS, UBUS,

SBUS, MH)
2595
5-1

5.0 Significance Thresholds

5.1 Air Quality Regional Significance Thresholds
The SCAQMD has established air quality emissions thresholds for criteria air pollutants for the purposes of determining whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment per Section 15002(g) of the Guidelines for implementing CEQA. By complying with the thresholds of significance, the project would be in compliance with the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and the federal and state air quality standards.

Table 12 lists the air quality significance thresholds for the six air pollutants analyzed in this report. Lead is not included as part of this analysis as the project is not expected to emit lead in any significant measurable quantity.

Table 12
SCAQMD Regional Significance Air Quality Thresholds
Pollutant Construction (lbs/day) Operation (lbs/day)
NOX 100 55
VOC 75 55
PM10 150 150
PM2.5 55 55
SOX 150 150
CO 550 550
1 Source: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significancethresholds.pdf

5.2 City of Ontario General Plan
The City of Ontario describes several goals and policies for addressing air quality and greenhouse gas in the General Plan ER4 Air Quality. The following policy goals are aimed at providing guidance and policy direction in providing better indoor and outdoor air quality for Ontario and the air basin will improve the quality of life of residents, workers and visitors, decrease health care costs and make Ontario more prosperous by making the City a more desirable place to be.
2596
5-2
GOAL ER4: Improved indoor and outdoor air quality and reduced locally generated pollutant emissions
ER4-1 Land Use. We reduce GHG and other local pollutant emissions through compact, mixed use, and transit-oriented development and development that improves the regional jobs-housing balance.

ER4-2 Sensitive Land Uses. We prohibit the future siting of sensitive land uses, within the distances defined by the California Air Resources Board for specific source categories, without sufficient mitigation.

ER4-3 Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Emissions Reductions. We will reduce GHG emissions in accordance with regional, state and federal regulations.

ER4-4 Indoor Air Quality. We will comply with State Green Building Codes relative to indoor air quality.

ER4-5 Transportation. We promote mass transit and non-motorized mobility options (e.g. walking, biking) to reduce air pollutant emissions.

ER4-6 Particulate Matter. We support efforts to reduce particulate matter to meet State and Federal Clean Air Standards.

ER4-7 Other Agency Collaboration. We collaborate with other agencies within the South Coast Air Basin to improve regional air quality at the emission source.

5.4 City of Ontario Community Climate Action Plan
The City of Ontario has adopted the Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP) to help reduce citywide GHG emissions and align the City with the statewide Scoping Plan GHG reduction efforts.

The CCAP has established Screening Tables, which are setup similar to a checklist, with points allocated to certain elements of the project that would contribute to reduced GHG emissions. If a project garners 100 points (by including enough GHG reducing elements), then the project is consistent with Ontario City’s Community Climate Action Plan for reducing emissions and the impact may be considered less than significant for purposes of CEQA.
2597
6-1

6.0 Air Quality Impact Analysis
Consistent with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, a significant impact related to air quality would occur if the proposed project is determined to:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard.
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

6.1 Short Term Air Quality Impacts - Construction

6.1.1 Daily Emissions - Construction
Daily air quality emissions include both on-site and off-site emissions associated with construction of the project. Regional daily emissions of criteria pollutants are compared to the SCAQMD thresholds of significance.

As shown in Table 13, daily emissions of criteria pollutants are expected to be below the allowable thresholds of significance.

CalEEMod daily emissions outputs are provided in Appendix A. 2598
6-2
Table 13
Daily Construction Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1, 2
Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Demolition 0.91 14.16 26.89 0.09 7.84 1.56
Site Preparation 0.55 2.08 21.68 0.04 7.78 3.98
Grading 0.85 3.36 33.90 0.06 3.85 1.56
Building Construction 4.86 17.12 60.88 0.16 11.46 3.28
Paving 1.29 1.25 17.86 0.02 0.21 0.08
Architectural Coating 70.26 0.56 8.39 0.02 1.96 0.53
Maximum1 70.26 17.12 60.88 0.16 11.46 3.98
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No
1 Maximum daily emission during summer or winter; includes both on-site and off-site project emissions. 2 Includes fugitive dust control measures and Tier 4 engine requirements.

The project must follow mandatory SCAQMD rules and requirements with regards to fugitive dust control, as described in Section 6.1.3. Compliance with the standard dust control measures is considered to be part of the conditions of approval for the project and built into the design features.

Table 13 shows that, the project’s daily construction emissions will be below the applicable SCAQMD air quality standards and thresholds of significance. As a result, the project would not contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation.

Furthermore, by complying with the SCAQMD standards, the project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors).

The project’s short-term construction impact on regional air resources is less than significant.
2599
6-3

6.1.2 Fugitive Dust - Construction
The Project is required to comply with regional rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions associated with suspended particulate matter, also known as fugitive dust. Fugitive dust emissions are commonly associated with land clearing activities, cutand-fill grading operations, and exposure of soils to the air and wind. SCAQMD Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust is controlled with best-available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 require implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site.

The following recommendations are listed to ensure full compliance with the applicable dust control standards.

DF-1 Prepare and implement a Construction Management Plan which will include Best Available Control Measures to be submitted to the City of Ontario.

DF-2 Follow the standard SCAQMD rules and requirements with regards to fugitive dust control, which includes, but are not limited to the following:

1. All active construction areas shall be watered two (2) times daily.

2. Speed on unpaved roads shall be reduced to less than 15 mph.

3. Any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway shall be swept or washed at the site access points within 30 minutes.

4. Any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material shall be covered or watered twice daily.

5. All operations on any unpaved surface shall be suspended if winds exceed 15 mph.

6. Access points shall be washed or swept daily.

7. Construction sites shall be sandbagged for erosion control.

8. Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers’ specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more).

10. Pave or gravel construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road and use gravel aprons at truck exits.

11. Replace the ground cover of disturbed areas as quickly possible. 2600
6-4

12. A fugitive dust control plan should be prepared and submitted to SCAQMD prior to the start of construction.

6.1.3 Odors - Construction
Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction will emit odors; however, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed.

The project is required to comply with Rule 402 during construction, which states that a person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed Project.

Therefore, the project impact from odor emissions is less than significant.

6.1.4 Asbestos - Construction
Asbestos is a carcinogen and is categorized as a hazardous air pollutant by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Asbestos fibers imbedded within construction materials become a health hazard once they are disturbed and rendered airborne, such as through physical contact like building renovation and demolition activities. Asbestos is regulated through the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and SCAQMD is the local enforcement authority for asbestos.

The project is not expected to require the demolition of existing building or structures.

Therefore, the potential risk from exposure to asbestos during construction is small.

Asbestos also occurs naturally in serpentine and ultramafic rock. Based on the California Division of Mines and Geology General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California - Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos, naturally occurring asbestos has not been shown to occur within in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small.

In the event asbestos is found on the site, the project will be required to comply with SCAQMD and NESHAP standards and protocols. SCAQMD Rule 1403 establishes the survey requirements, notification, and work practice requirements to prevent asbestos emissions 2601
6-5
during construction activities. By following the required asbestos abatement protocols, the project impact from asbestos would be less than significant.

6.1.5 Diesel Particulate Matter - Construction
The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions from the project would be related to diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions associated with heavy diesel equipment used during construction. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of “individual cancer risk”. “Individual Cancer Risk” is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of toxic air contaminants over a 30-year lifetime will contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk-assessment methodology.

The proposed project’s construction activity is not expected to be a long-term (i.e., 30 years) source of toxic air contaminant emissions, thus the individual cancer risk is greatly reduced.

However, given the close proximity of the project to nearest sensitive receptors (residential homes to the north), several measures are provided to help ensure the potential health risk associated with DPM during construction is reduced to the maximum extent feasible. This includes a requirement for Tier 4 engines on all diesel-powered construction equipment.

Tier 4 engines, along with the latest national fuel standards, have been shown to yield PM reductions of over 95% from the typical Tier 2 and Tier 3 engines8.

It is presumed that with the recommended design features and Tier 4 engines in place that the potential short term construction health risks will be adequately reduced to be less than significant. It should be noted however, that a quantified diesel health risk assessment (HRA) has not been prepared as part of the scope of this analysis.

The following design features are recommended to help ensure the project does not expose receptors to substantial pollution concentrations during construction:

DF-3 All diesel construction equipment shall have Tier 4 low emission “clean diesel” engines (OEM or retrofit) that include diesel oxidation catalysts and diesel particulate filters that meet the latest CARB best available control technology.
8 EPA. Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel; Final Rule. (40 CFR Parts 9, 69, et al.)
2602
6-6
DF-4 Construction equipment shall be maintained in proper tune.

DF-5 All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five (5) minutes or longer.

DF-6 Minimize the simultaneous operation of multiple construction equipment units.

DF-7 The use of heavy construction equipment and earthmoving activity shall be suspended during Air Alerts when the Air Quality Index reaches the “Unhealthy” level.

DF-8 Establish an electricity supply to the construction site and use electric powered equipment instead of diesel-powered equipment or generators, where feasible.

DF-9 Utilize zero VOC and low VOC paints and solvents, wherever possible.

6.2 Long Term Air Quality Impacts - Operation

6.2.1 Daily Emissions - Operation
Long-term operational air pollutant impacts from the project are shown in Table 14. The project is not expected to exceed any of the allowable daily emissions thresholds for criteria pollutants at the regional level. CalEEMod daily emissions outputs are provided in Appendix A.

The project’s daily operational emissions will be below the applicable SCAQMD air quality thresholds of significance and the project would not contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Furthermore, by complying with the SCAQMD standards, the project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors).

The project related long-term air quality impacts are less than significant. 2603
6-7
Table 14
Daily Operational Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1
Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Mobile Sources 17.27 14.68 127.09 0.24 23.87 6.46
Energy Sources 0.30 2.55 1.10 0.02 0.21 0.21
Area Sources 19.70 10.40 61.39 0.07 1.10 1.10
Total 37.26 27.64 189.58 0.32 25.18 7.77
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No
1 Maximum daily emission during summer or winter; includes both on-site and off-site project emissions. 2 Daily emissions reports are provided in Appendix A.

6.2.2 Odors - Operation
Land uses that commonly receive odor complaints include agricultural uses (farming and livestock), chemical plants, composting operations, dairies, fiberglass molding facilities, food processing plants, landfills, refineries, rail yards, and wastewater treatment plants. The proposed project does not contain land uses that would typically be associated with significant odor emissions.

The project will be required to comply with standard building code requirements related to exhaust ventilation, as well as comply with SCAQMD Rule 402. Rule 402 requires that a person may not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. Project related odors are not expected to meet the criteria of being a nuisance. The project’s operation would result in less than significant odor impacts.
2604
6-8

6.2.3 Toxic Air Contaminants - Operations
The project would consist of commercial/retail and residential land uses. These types of projects do not include major sources of toxic air contaminants (TAC) emissions that would result in significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

Therefore, the project impact is considered less than significant. 2605
7-1

7.0 Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
Consistent with CEQA Guidelines, a significant impact related to greenhouse gas would occur if the proposed project is determined to:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.

For purposes of this project, the City of Ontario CCAP establishes the requirements for determining whether a project would have a significant impact to GHG emissions under CEQA.

The CCAP uses Screening Tables, which are setup similar to a checklist, with points allocated to certain elements of the project to reduce GHG emissions. If a project garners 100 points (by including enough GHG reducing elements), then the project is consistent with CCAP and the impact may be considered less than significant for purposes of CEQA.

The proposed project is expected to comply with the CCAP by implementing the Screening Table requirements into the project design. To help ensure the project adheres to the CCAP requirements, the following project design feature is provided:

DF-10 Implement the GHG Reduction Measures from the Ontario County Climate Action Plan (CAP) Screening Tables to achieve at least 100 points, per the requirements for Mixed Use Projects.

As described in Appendix B of the CCAP, for mixed use projects, both the residential and non-residential screening tables shall be completed. Mixed use Projects that garner at least 100 points will be consistent with the reduction quantities in the City’s CAP and are considered less than significant for GHG emissions.

Therefore, with the implementation of the CCAP Screening Tables, the project is not expected to generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that would cause a significant impact on the environment. Also, by complying with the CCAP, the project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases and the impact is considered less than significant. 2606
7-2
Furthermore, since the purpose of the City’s CCAP is to ensure compliance with the state’s climate initiatives for reducing GHG emissions, by complying with the CCAP, the project will also be in compliant with the broader statewide goals for combating climate change; such as those required in the CARB Scoping Plan and AB 32.

The mixed use project is also located within close proximity to high quality transit, located in a low VMT zone, and offers high-density residential development near commercial uses.

The project will include pedestrian friendly and walkable design that will encourage fewer auto-based trips. The following project design features will be provided to further help reduce GHG emissions:

DF-11 Comply with the mandatory requirements of California Building Standards Code Title 24 Part 6 (Energy Code) and Title 24 Part 11 (CAL Green).

DF-13 Implement zero waste strategies, recycling and composting programs for residential and non-residential uses.

DF-14 Encourage residents and landscape maintenance crews to use electric landscaping equipment, such as lawn mowers and leaf blowers, wherever feasible.

DF-15 No natural gas or wood burning fireplaces shall be installed in any residential dwelling.

DF-16 Implement trip reduction measures that reduce the number of auto-based trips and encourage the use of transit, bicycling, and walking. Such as;

2. Provide traffic calming measures (i.e. marked crosswalks, raised crosswalks, raised intersections, count-down signal timers, curb 2607
7-3
extensions, speed tables, median islands, tight corner radii, roundabouts or mini-circles, on-street parking, planter strips with street trees, chicanes/chokers, etc.)

3. Provide bicycle racks for the retail and commercial uses and secure bicycle parking areas for the office and residential uses.

DF-17 Provide electric vehicle charging stations per the requirements of CALGreen. 2608
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Exhibits
2609
engineering
group, inc.

N
Location Map
Exhibit A
TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AIR QUALITY AND GHG IMPACT STUDY, City of Ontario, CA 2957-2021-03
Lot-F Lot-G
Lot-A
Lot-B
Lot-C Lot-D
2610
engineering group, inc.

N
Site Plan
Exhibit B
TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AIR QUALITY AND GHG IMPACT STUDY, City of Ontario, CA2957-2021-03 2611
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Appendices
2612
Appendix A

Daily Emissions Calculations Output
(CalEEMod)
2613
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - The proposed project consists of a mixed-use town center development with 691 multifamily DU and 71,200 square feet of commercial/retail land uses on approximately 18.73 acres.

Construction Phase - The project's architectural coating phase will be extended to 75 days.

Demolition - The project is proposing to demolish approximetely 326,026 square feet of surface asphalt parking lot.

Vehicle Trips - The trip generation rates have been updated to reflect Toyota Arena TIA Scoping Agreement, by RK, May 25, 2021 and Traffic Impact Study and SANBAG VMT Model.

Fleet Mix - Operational fleet mix adjusted to equal 2% trucks with GVWR > 10,000 lbs.

Woodstoves - SCAQMD Rule 445 restricts wood burning hearths/fireplaces from being installed in new development.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust control.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Apartments Mid Rise 691.00 Dwelling Unit 11.47 691,000.00 1976 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 919.00 Space 0.00 367,600.00 0 Parking Lot 1,170.00 Space 7.26 468,000.00 0
Regional Shopping Center 71.20 1000sqft 0.00 71,200.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
531.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2614
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2615
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 75.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/13/2023 6/29/2023
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 34.55 0.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 8.0940e-003
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 0.02
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 0.02
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 8.0940e-003
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.55
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.54
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.54
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.55
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.18
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.17
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.17
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.18
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 3.3700e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 7.1960e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2616
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 7.1960e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 3.3700e-003
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 2.3750e-003
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 5.0710e-003
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 5.0710e-003
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 2.3750e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 5.3340e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 0.01
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 0.01
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 5.3340e-003
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 2.6200e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 5.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 5.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 2.6200e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 4.4700e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 9.5400e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 9.5400e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 4.4700e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 1.1900e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 2.5400e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 2.5400e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2617

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 1.1900e-004
tblLandUse LotAcreage 18.18 11.47
tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.27 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 10.53 7.26
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.63 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 4.37
tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP 40.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.37
tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP 19.20 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 4.37
tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 40.20 100.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 5.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 46.12 36.38
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 5.17
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 5.17
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 37.75 29.77
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2618

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 6.4347 46.4611 59.9899 0.1622 19.8582 2.0456 21.9038 10.1558 1.8819 12.0378 0.0000 16,507.47 78 16,507.47
78 1.9489 0.9233 16,807.91
57 2022 5.7820 27.6734 55.8128 0.1582 11.1581 0.9758 12.1338 2.9915 0.9189 3.9104 0.0000 16,137.59 84 16,137.59
84 0.9697 0.8848 16,425.50
12 2023 70.4209 24.2267 52.3577 0.1536 11.1580 0.8064 11.9644 2.9915 0.7587 3.7502 0.0000 15,714.52 65 15,714.52
65 0.9318 0.8384 15,987.67
09 Maximum 70.4209 46.4611 59.9899 0.1622 19.8582 2.0456 21.9038 10.1558 1.8819 12.0378 0.0000 16,507.47 78 16,507.47
78 1.9489 0.9233 16,807.91
57 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.8616 16.4282 60.8749 0.1622 11.1581 0.2990 11.4571 3.9176 0.2858 3.9807 0.0000 16,507.47 78 16,507.47
78 1.9489 0.9233 16,807.91
57 2022 4.4036 14.2925 56.9096 0.1582 11.1581 0.2076 11.3656 2.9915 0.1985 3.1900 0.0000 16,137.59 84 16,137.59
84 0.9697 0.8848 16,425.50
12 2023 70.2589 12.0766 53.5740 0.1536 11.1580 0.1474 11.3054 2.9915 0.1410 3.1326 0.0000 15,714.52 65 15,714.52
65 0.9318 0.8384 15,987.67
09 Maximum 70.2589 16.4282 60.8749 0.1622 11.1581 0.2990 11.4571 3.9176 0.2858 3.9807 0.0000 16,507.47 78 16,507.47
78 1.9489 0.9233 16,807.91
57 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2619
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

3.77 56.49 -1.90 0.00 20.63 82.92 25.81 38.65 82.43 47.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2620

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Energy 0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 Mobile 17.2690 13.8038 127.0914 0.2363 23.6977 0.1690 23.8666 6.3029 0.1573 6.4602 24,255.58 34 24,255.58
34 1.5947 1.1054 24,624.86
18 Total 37.2623 26.7575 189.5821 0.3178 23.6977 1.4792 25.1768 6.3029 1.4675 7.7704 0.0000 40,050.44 29 40,050.44
29 1.9954 1.3931 40,515.46
82 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Energy 0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 Mobile 17.2690 13.8038 127.0914 0.2363 23.6977 0.1690 23.8666 6.3029 0.1573 6.4602 24,255.58 34 24,255.58
34 1.5947 1.1054 24,624.86
18 Total 37.2623 26.7575 189.5821 0.3178 23.6977 1.4792 25.1768 6.3029 1.4675 7.7704 0.0000 40,050.44 29 40,050.44
29 1.9954 1.3931 40,515.46
82 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2621

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2021 10/28/2021 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/29/2021 11/11/2021 5 10 3 Grading Grading 11/12/2021 12/23/2021 5 30
4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/24/2021 2/16/2023 5 300 5 Paving Paving 2/17/2023 3/16/2023 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/17/2023 6/29/2023 5 75 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 1,399,275; Residential Outdoor: 466,425; Non-Residential Indoor: 106,800; Non-Residential Outdoor: 35,600; Striped Parking Area: 50,136 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 7.26
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2622

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 1,483.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 871.00 222.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 174.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2623

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 16.0493 0.0000 16.0493 2.4300 0.0000 2.4300 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 16.0493 1.5513 17.6006 2.4300 1.4411 3.8711 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2624

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.3825 11.5481 2.9311 0.0448 1.2986 0.1738 1.4724 0.3561 0.1663 0.5224 4,874.060 9 4,874.060
9 0.2123 0.7723 5,109.509
6 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0689 0.0459 0.6786 1.6000e0030.1677 9.4000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.6000e0040.0453 161.8483 161.8483 4.5800e0034.2800e003163.2380 Total 0.4515 11.5940 3.6097 0.0464 1.4662 0.1748 1.6410 0.4006 0.1672 0.5677 5,035.909 2 5,035.909
2 0.2169 0.7766 5,272.747
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.1388 0.0000 6.1388 0.9295 0.0000 0.9295 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4623 2.0032 23.2798 0.0388 0.0616 0.0616 0.0616 0.0616 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 0.4623 2.0032 23.2798 0.0388 6.1388 0.0616 6.2005 0.9295 0.0616 0.9911 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2625

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 19.6570 2.0445 21.7015 10.1025 1.8809 11.9834 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2626

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0827 0.0551 0.8143 1.9200e0030.2012 1.1300e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0400e0030.0544 194.2180 194.2180 5.5000e0035.1300e003195.8856 Total 0.0827 0.0551 0.8143 1.9200e0030.2012 1.1300e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0400e0030.0544 194.2180 194.2180 5.5000e0035.1300e003195.8856 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.5188 0.0000 7.5188 3.8642 0.0000 3.8642 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4656 2.0175 20.8690 0.0380 0.0621 0.0621 0.0621 0.0621 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 0.4656 2.0175 20.8690 0.0380 7.5188 0.0621 7.5809 3.8642 0.0621 3.9263 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2627

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 9.2036 1.9853 11.1889 3.6538 1.8265 5.4803 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2628

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0919 0.0612 0.9048 2.1300e0030.2236 1.2500e0030.2248 0.0593 1.1500e0030.0604 215.7978 215.7978 6.1100e0035.7000e003217.6506 Total 0.0919 0.0612 0.9048 2.1300e0030.2236 1.2500e0030.2248 0.0593 1.1500e0030.0604 215.7978 215.7978 6.1100e0035.7000e003217.6506 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.5204 0.0000 3.5204 1.3976 0.0000 1.3976 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0620 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0620 3.5204 0.1015 3.6219 1.3976 0.1015 1.4991 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2629

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2630

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.5310 11.5275 4.0099 0.0425 1.4223 0.2037 1.6261 0.4096 0.1949 0.6045 4,556.120 8 4,556.120
8 0.1292 0.6749 4,760.466
3 Worker 4.0029 2.6661 39.4047 0.0928 9.7357 0.0545 9.7902 2.5820 0.0502 2.6321 9,397.993 1 9,397.993
1 0.2662 0.2485 9,478.685
1 Total 4.5338 14.1935 43.4147 0.1353 11.1581 0.2582 11.4163 2.9915 0.2451 3.2366 13,954.11 39 13,954.11
39 0.3954 0.9233 14,239.15
14 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2631

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2632

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3869 9.7214 3.5677 0.0414 1.4223 0.1157 1.5380 0.4096 0.1107 0.5202 4,441.528 1 4,441.528
1 0.1200 0.6573 4,640.396
2 Worker 3.6889 2.3364 35.8817 0.0899 9.7357 0.0511 9.7868 2.5820 0.0471 2.6290 9,141.736 7 9,141.736
7 0.2377 0.2275 9,215.472
9 Total 4.0757 12.0578 39.4494 0.1313 11.1581 0.1668 11.3248 2.9915 0.1577 3.1492 13,583.26 48 13,583.26
48 0.3577 0.8848 13,855.86
90 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2633

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2634

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2599 7.7868 3.2674 0.0397 1.4223 0.0585 1.4808 0.4096 0.0560 0.4655 4,260.583 6 4,260.583
6 0.1114 0.6292 4,450.860
6 Worker 3.4058 2.0551 32.8463 0.0870 9.7357 0.0481 9.7838 2.5820 0.0443 2.6262 8,898.733 0 8,898.733
0 0.2126 0.2093 8,966.404
2 Total 3.6656 9.8419 36.1137 0.1267 11.1580 0.1066 11.2647 2.9915 0.1003 3.0918 13,159.31 66 13,159.31
66 0.3239 0.8384 13,417.26
48 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2635

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.9511 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.9838 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2636

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e0030.1677 8.3000e0040.1685 0.0445 7.6000e0040.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e0033.6000e003154.4157 Total 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e0030.1677 8.3000e0040.1685 0.0445 7.6000e0040.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e0033.6000e003154.4157 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.2805 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.9511 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2315 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2637

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 69.5489 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 69.7405 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2638

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.6804 0.4105 6.5617 0.0174 1.9449 9.6100e0031.9545 0.5158 8.8400e0030.5246 1,777.703 3 1,777.703
3 0.0425 0.0418 1,791.222
0 Total 0.6804 0.4105 6.5617 0.0174 1.9449 9.6100e0031.9545 0.5158 8.8400e0030.5246 1,777.703 3 1,777.703
3 0.0425 0.0418 1,791.222
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 69.5489 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 69.5786 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2639

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2640
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 17.2690 13.8038 127.0914 0.2363 23.6977 0.1690 23.8666 6.3029 0.1573 6.4602 24,255.58 34 24,255.58
34 1.5947 1.1054 24,624.86
18 Unmitigated 17.2690 13.8038 127.0914 0.2363 23.6977 0.1690 23.8666 6.3029 0.1573 6.4602 24,255.58 34 24,255.58
34 1.5947 1.1054 24,624.86
18 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2641
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.550545 0.057163 0.176442 0.142301 0.027646 0.003370 0.005334 0.008094 0.000262 0.000119 0.025903 0.000447 0.002375 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Parking Lot 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Regional Shopping Center 0.550545 0.057163 0.176442 0.142301 0.027646 0.003370 0.005334 0.008094 0.000262 0.000119 0.025903 0.000447 0.002375

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2642

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
27227.6 0.2936 2.5092 1.0678 0.0160 0.2029 0.2029 0.2029 0.2029 3,203.248 8 3,203.248
8 0.0614 0.0587 3,222.284
1 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center
429.151 4.6300e0030.0421 0.0353 2.5000e0043.2000e0033.2000e0033.2000e0033.2000e00350.4883 50.4883 9.7000e0049.3000e00450.7883 Total 0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2643

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

27.2276 0.2936 2.5092 1.0678 0.0160 0.2029 0.2029 0.2029 0.2029 3,203.248 8 3,203.248
8 0.0614 0.0587 3,222.284
1 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center

0.429151 4.6300e0030.0421 0.0353 2.5000e0043.2000e0033.2000e0033.2000e0033.2000e00350.4883 50.4883 9.7000e0049.3000e00450.7883 Total 0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2644
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Unmitigated 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

1.4291 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

15.3875 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.1402 9.7431 4.1460 0.0622 0.7877 0.7877 0.7877 0.7877 0.0000 12,438.00 00 12,438.00
00 0.2384 0.2280 12,511.91
28 Landscaping 1.7383 0.6593 57.2416 3.0300e0030.3164 0.3164 0.3164 0.3164 103.1224 103.1224 0.1000 105.6212 Total 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2645

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

1.4291 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

15.3875 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.1402 9.7431 4.1460 0.0622 0.7877 0.7877 0.7877 0.7877 0.0000 12,438.00 00 12,438.00
00 0.2384 0.2280 12,511.91
28 Landscaping 1.7383 0.6593 57.2416 3.0300e0030.3164 0.3164 0.3164 0.3164 103.1224 103.1224 0.1000 105.6212 Total 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2646

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 9:43 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2647
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - The proposed project consists of a mixed-use town center development with 691 multifamily DU and 71,200 square feet of commercial/retail land uses on approximately 18.73 acres.

Construction Phase - The project's architectural coating phase will be extended to 75 days.

Demolition - The project is proposing to demolish approximetely 326,026 square feet of surface asphalt parking lot.

Vehicle Trips - The trip generation rates have been updated to reflect Toyota Arena TIA Scoping Agreement, by RK, May 25, 2021 and Traffic Impact Study and SANBAG VMT Model.

Fleet Mix - Operational fleet mix adjusted to equal 2% trucks with GVWR > 10,000 lbs.

Woodstoves - SCAQMD Rule 445 restricts wood burning hearths/fireplaces from being installed in new development.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust control.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
531.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2648
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2649
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 75.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/13/2023 6/29/2023
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 34.55 0.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 8.0940e-003
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 0.02
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 0.02
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 8.0940e-003
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.55
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.54
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.54
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.55
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.18
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.17
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.17
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.18
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 3.3700e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 7.1960e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2650
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 7.1960e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 3.3700e-003
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 2.3750e-003
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 5.0710e-003
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 5.0710e-003
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 2.3750e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 5.3340e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 0.01
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 0.01
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 5.3340e-003
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 2.6200e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 5.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 5.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 2.6200e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 4.4700e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 9.5400e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 9.5400e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 4.4700e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 1.1900e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 2.5400e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 2.5400e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2651

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 1.1900e-004
tblLandUse LotAcreage 18.18 11.47
tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.27 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 10.53 7.26
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.63 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 4.37
tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP 40.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.37
tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP 19.20 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 4.37
tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 40.20 100.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 5.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 46.12 36.38
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 5.17
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 5.17
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 37.75 29.77
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2652

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 6.2538 46.4642 53.0187 0.1535 19.8582 2.0456 21.9038 10.1558 1.8819 12.0378 0.0000 15,621.50 62 15,621.50
62 1.9489 0.9324 15,924.58
46 2022 5.6217 28.2785 49.5312 0.1498 11.1581 0.9761 12.1342 2.9915 0.9192 3.9107 0.0000 15,280.39 11 15,280.39
11 0.9684 0.8933 15,570.80
09 2023 70.3959 24.7705 46.6465 0.1455 11.1580 0.8066 11.9646 2.9915 0.7589 3.7504 0.0000 14,888.15 18 14,888.15
18 0.9311 0.8471 15,163.86
76 Maximum 70.3959 46.4642 53.0187 0.1535 19.8582 2.0456 21.9038 10.1558 1.8819 12.0378 0.0000 15,621.50 62 15,621.50
62 1.9489 0.9324 15,924.58
46 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.6807 17.1150 53.9038 0.1535 11.1581 0.2995 11.4576 3.9176 0.2863 3.9807 0.0000 15,621.50 62 15,621.50
62 1.9489 0.9324 15,924.58
46 2022 4.2433 14.8976 50.6281 0.1498 11.1581 0.2079 11.3660 2.9915 0.1988 3.1904 0.0000 15,280.39 11 15,280.39
11 0.9684 0.8933 15,570.80
09 2023 70.2340 12.6203 47.8627 0.1455 11.1580 0.1477 11.3057 2.9915 0.1413 3.1328 0.0000 14,888.15 18 14,888.15
18 0.9311 0.8471 15,163.86
76 Maximum 70.2340 17.1150 53.9038 0.1535 11.1581 0.2995 11.4576 3.9176 0.2863 3.9807 0.0000 15,621.50 62 15,621.50
62 1.9489 0.9324 15,924.58
46 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2653
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

3.78 55.15 -2.14 0.00 20.63 82.89 25.81 38.65 82.40 47.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2654

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Energy 0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 Mobile 14.6266 14.6824 116.7457 0.2181 23.6977 0.1691 23.8667 6.3029 0.1574 6.4603 22,396.74 06 22,396.74
06 1.6802 1.1415 22,778.90
89 Total 34.6199 27.6361 179.2364 0.2996 23.6977 1.4793 25.1769 6.3029 1.4676 7.7705 0.0000 38,191.60 01 38,191.60
01 2.0809 1.4292 38,669.51
53 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Energy 0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 Mobile 14.6266 14.6824 116.7457 0.2181 23.6977 0.1691 23.8667 6.3029 0.1574 6.4603 22,396.74 06 22,396.74
06 1.6802 1.1415 22,778.90
89 Total 34.6199 27.6361 179.2364 0.2996 23.6977 1.4793 25.1769 6.3029 1.4676 7.7705 0.0000 38,191.60 01 38,191.60
01 2.0809 1.4292 38,669.51
53 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2655

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 1,399,275; Residential Outdoor: 466,425; Non-Residential Indoor: 106,800; Non-Residential Outdoor: 35,600; Striped Parking Area: 50,136 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 7.26
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2656

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 1,483.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 871.00 222.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 174.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2657

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 16.0493 0.0000 16.0493 2.4300 0.0000 2.4300 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 16.0493 1.5513 17.6006 2.4300 1.4411 3.8711 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2658

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.3721 12.1085 2.9946 0.0448 1.2986 0.1740 1.4726 0.3561 0.1665 0.5226 4,876.631 1 4,876.631
1 0.2118 0.7727 5,112.189
0 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0661 0.0483 0.5563 1.4500e0030.1677 9.4000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.6000e0040.0453 146.5366 146.5366 4.5600e0034.4200e003147.9673 Total 0.4382 12.1568 3.5508 0.0463 1.4662 0.1750 1.6412 0.4006 0.1674 0.5679 5,023.167 7 5,023.167
7 0.2163 0.7771 5,260.156
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.1388 0.0000 6.1388 0.9295 0.0000 0.9295 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4623 2.0032 23.2798 0.0388 0.0616 0.0616 0.0616 0.0616 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 0.4623 2.0032 23.2798 0.0388 6.1388 0.0616 6.2005 0.9295 0.0616 0.9911 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2659

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 19.6570 2.0445 21.7015 10.1025 1.8809 11.9834 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2660

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0793 0.0580 0.6675 1.7400e0030.2012 1.1300e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0400e0030.0544 175.8439 175.8439 5.4700e0035.3000e003177.5607 Total 0.0793 0.0580 0.6675 1.7400e0030.2012 1.1300e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0400e0030.0544 175.8439 175.8439 5.4700e0035.3000e003177.5607 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.5188 0.0000 7.5188 3.8642 0.0000 3.8642 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4656 2.0175 20.8690 0.0380 0.0621 0.0621 0.0621 0.0621 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 0.4656 2.0175 20.8690 0.0380 7.5188 0.0621 7.5809 3.8642 0.0621 3.9263 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2661

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 9.2036 1.9853 11.1889 3.6538 1.8265 5.4803 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2662

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0881 0.0644 0.7417 1.9300e0030.2236 1.2500e0030.2248 0.0593 1.1500e0030.0604 195.3821 195.3821 6.0800e0035.8900e003197.2897 Total 0.0881 0.0644 0.7417 1.9300e0030.2236 1.2500e0030.2248 0.0593 1.1500e0030.0604 195.3821 195.3821 6.0800e0035.8900e003197.2897 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.5204 0.0000 3.5204 1.3976 0.0000 1.3976 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0620 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.1015 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 0.7616 3.3000 32.9991 0.0620 3.5204 0.1015 3.6219 1.3976 0.1015 1.4991 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2663

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2664

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.5177 12.0752 4.1438 0.0425 1.4223 0.2042 1.6266 0.4096 0.1954 0.6050 4,559.252 9 4,559.252
9 0.1286 0.6758 4,763.854
3 Worker 3.8352 2.8050 32.2997 0.0840 9.7357 0.0545 9.7902 2.5820 0.0502 2.6321 8,508.889 4 8,508.889
4 0.2646 0.2566 8,591.966
1 Total 4.3529 14.8803 36.4435 0.1265 11.1581 0.2587 11.4168 2.9915 0.2456 3.2371 13,068.14 23 13,068.14
23 0.3932 0.9324 13,355.82
04 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2665

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2666

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3718 10.2054 3.6933 0.0415 1.4223 0.1160 1.5383 0.4096 0.1110 0.5206 4,446.427 2 4,446.427
2 0.1193 0.6584 4,645.616
5 Worker 3.5437 2.4575 29.4745 0.0814 9.7357 0.0511 9.7868 2.5820 0.0471 2.6290 8,279.630 3 8,279.630
3 0.2371 0.2349 8,355.552
2 Total 3.9155 12.6629 33.1678 0.1229 11.1581 0.1671 11.3252 2.9915 0.1580 3.1496 12,726.05 75 12,726.05
75 0.3564 0.8933 13,001.16
87 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2667

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2668

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2418 8.2248 3.3683 0.0398 1.4223 0.0588 1.4811 0.4096 0.0562 0.4658 4,270.916 0 4,270.916
0 0.1105 0.6311 4,461.753
2 Worker 3.2807 2.1608 27.0342 0.0788 9.7357 0.0481 9.7838 2.5820 0.0443 2.6262 8,062.025 9 8,062.025
9 0.2128 0.2160 8,131.708
4 Total 3.5225 10.3856 30.4025 0.1186 11.1580 0.1069 11.2649 2.9915 0.1005 3.0920 12,332.94 19 12,332.94
19 0.3233 0.8471 12,593.46
15 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 0.3278 2.2347 17.4603 0.0269 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2669

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.9511 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.9838 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2670

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e0030.1677 8.3000e0040.1685 0.0445 7.6000e0040.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e0033.7200e003140.0409 Total 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e0030.1677 8.3000e0040.1685 0.0445 7.6000e0040.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e0033.7200e003140.0409 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.2805 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.9511 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2315 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2671

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 69.5489 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 69.7405 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2672

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.6554 0.4317 5.4006 0.0157 1.9449 9.6100e0031.9545 0.5158 8.8400e0030.5246 1,610.554 0 1,610.554
0 0.0425 0.0432 1,624.474
5 Total 0.6554 0.4317 5.4006 0.0157 1.9449 9.6100e0031.9545 0.5158 8.8400e0030.5246 1,610.554 0 1,610.554
0 0.0425 0.0432 1,624.474
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 69.5489 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 69.5786 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2673

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2674
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 14.6266 14.6824 116.7457 0.2181 23.6977 0.1691 23.8667 6.3029 0.1574 6.4603 22,396.74 06 22,396.74
06 1.6802 1.1415 22,778.90
89 Unmitigated 14.6266 14.6824 116.7457 0.2181 23.6977 0.1691 23.8667 6.3029 0.1574 6.4603 22,396.74 06 22,396.74
06 1.6802 1.1415 22,778.90
89 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2675
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.550545 0.057163 0.176442 0.142301 0.027646 0.003370 0.005334 0.008094 0.000262 0.000119 0.025903 0.000447 0.002375 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Parking Lot 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Regional Shopping Center 0.550545 0.057163 0.176442 0.142301 0.027646 0.003370 0.005334 0.008094 0.000262 0.000119 0.025903 0.000447 0.002375

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2676

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
27227.6 0.2936 2.5092 1.0678 0.0160 0.2029 0.2029 0.2029 0.2029 3,203.248 8 3,203.248
8 0.0614 0.0587 3,222.284
1 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center
429.151 4.6300e0030.0421 0.0353 2.5000e0043.2000e0033.2000e0033.2000e0033.2000e00350.4883 50.4883 9.7000e0049.3000e00450.7883 Total 0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2677

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

0.429151 4.6300e0030.0421 0.0353 2.5000e0043.2000e0033.2000e0033.2000e0033.2000e00350.4883 50.4883 9.7000e0049.3000e00450.7883 Total 0.2983 2.5513 1.1031 0.0163 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 0.2061 3,253.737 1 3,253.737
1 0.0624 0.0597 3,273.072
5 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2678
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Unmitigated 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

1.4291 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

15.3875 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.1402 9.7431 4.1460 0.0622 0.7877 0.7877 0.7877 0.7877 0.0000 12,438.00 00 12,438.00
00 0.2384 0.2280 12,511.91
28 Landscaping 1.7383 0.6593 57.2416 3.0300e0030.3164 0.3164 0.3164 0.3164 103.1224 103.1224 0.1000 105.6212 Total 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2679

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

1.4291 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

15.3875 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.1402 9.7431 4.1460 0.0622 0.7877 0.7877 0.7877 0.7877 0.0000 12,438.00 00 12,438.00
00 0.2384 0.2280 12,511.91
28 Landscaping 1.7383 0.6593 57.2416 3.0300e0030.3164 0.3164 0.3164 0.3164 103.1224 103.1224 0.1000 105.6212 Total 19.6950 10.4024 61.3876 0.0652 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 1.1041 0.0000 12,541.12 24 12,541.12
24 0.3383 0.2280 12,617.53
40 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 34 Date: 6/2/2021 10:00 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2680

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

City of Ontario
Community Climate Action Plan Screening Table
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix C

APPENDIX C

NOISE IMPACT STUDY
2697
group, inc.
engineering

TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

NOISE IMPACT STUDY
City of Ontario
2698
rk16656.doc
JN:2957-2021-02

TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

NOISE IMPACT STUDY
City of Ontario, California
Prepared for:

Mr. Robert Montano

ADEPT DEVELOPMENT
388 Cordova Street, Suite 280
Pasadena, CA 91101
Prepared by:

RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Bryan Estrada, AICP
Darshan Shivaiah, M.S.

May 28, 2021
2699
Table of Contents
Section Page

1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives 1-1

1.2 Site Location 1-1

1.3 Project Description 1-1

1.4 Summary of Analysis Results 1-2

1.5 Recommended Project Design Features 1-3

2.0 Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration .................................................. 2-1

2.1 Sound, Noise and Acoustics 2-1

2.2 Frequency and Hertz 2-1

2.3 Sound Pressure Levels and Decibels 2-1

2.4 Addition of Decibels 2-1

2.5 Human Responses to Changes in Noise Levels 2-2

2.6 Noise Descriptors 2-2

2.7 Sound Propagation 2-5

2.8 Vibration Description 2-7

2.9 Vibration Perception 2-7

2.10 Vibration Propagation 2-8

2.10 Construction Related Vibration Level Prediction 2-8

3.0 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................. 3-1

3.1 Federal Regulations 3-1

3.2 State Regulations 3-2

3.3 City of Ontario Noise Regulations 3-3

3.3.1 City of Ontario Municipal Code Noise Standards 3-3

3.3.2 City of Ontario General Plan 3-3

3.4 CEQA Thresholds of Significance 3-4

4.0 Study Method and Procedures .............................................................. 4-1

4.1 Measurement Procedures and Criteria 4-1

4.2 Stationary Noise Modeling 4-2

4.3 Construction Noise Modeling 4-2

4.4 Construction Vibration Modeling 4-3

5.0 Existing Noise Environment................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Long-Term (24-Hour) Noise Measurement Results 5-1
2700
Table of Contents (Cont.)
Section Page

6.0 Operational Noise Impacts .................................................................... 6-1

6.1 Stationary Noise Source Impacts 6-1

6.2 Preliminary Interior Noise Analysis 6-3

6.3 Los Angeles Ontario International Airport (LAONT) 6-5

6.4 Recommended Operational Design Features 6-5

7.0 Construction Noise and Vibration Impacts ........................................... 7-1

7.1 Typical Construction Noise Levels 7-1

7.2 Construction Noise Impact Analysis 7-2

7.3 Construction Vibration 7-4

7.4 Construction Project Design Features 7-6
2701
List of Attachments
Exhibits
Location Map ........................................................................................................... A Site Plan ................................................................................................................... B Noise Monitoring Locations ...................................................................................... C LAONT Airport Noise Contour Map ........................................................................... C Tables
Land Use Summary ................................................................................................... 1 CEQA Noise Impact Criteria ....................................................................................... 2 Vibration Annoyance Potential Criteria ...................................................................... 3 Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria ........................................................... 4 Suggested "n" Values Based on Soil Classes ................................................................ 5 City of Ontario Municipal Code Exterior Noise Standards ........................................... 6 City of Ontario Municipal Code Interior Noise Standards ........................................... 7 Noise/Land Use Compatibility Guidelines ................................................................... 8 Stationary Source Noise Levels .................................................................................. 9 24 Noise Measurements Results LT-1 ........................................................................ 10 24 Noise Measurements Results LT-2 ........................................................................ 11 24 Noise Measurements Results LT-3 ........................................................................ 12 24 Noise Measurements Results LT-3 ........................................................................ 13 Stationary Noise Impact Analysis ............................................................................... 14 Future Traffic Noise Levels ......................................................................................... 15 Preliminary Interior Noise Impact Analysis .................................................................. 16 2702
List of Attachments (Cont.)
Tables (Cont.)
Typical Construction Noise Levels .............................................................................. 17 Project Construction Noise Levels – Residential Uses to the North .............................. 18 Typical Construction Vibration Levels ......................................................................... 19 Construction Vibration Impact Analysis ..................................................................... 20 Appendices
City of Ontario Noise Standards ............................................................................... A Field Data and Photos ............................................................................................... B Stationary Noise Calculation Result Sheets ................................................................. C Construction and Vibration Noise Calculation Result Sheets ....................................... D 2703
1-1

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the potential noise impacts from the proposed Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development (project) and provide recommendations, if necessary, to minimize any project noise impacts. The assessment was conducted within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and utilizes the noise standards set forth by the applicable Federal, State, and local agencies.

The following is provided in this report:
 A description of the study area and the proposed project  Information regarding the fundamentals of noise
 Identification of the regulatory setting and applicable noise standards  Analysis of the existing noise environment
 Analysis of the project’s operational noise impact to adjacent receptors  Analysis of the project’s construction noise and vibration impact to adjacent sensitive receptors
 Summary of recommended mitigation measures and project design features to reduce noise level impacts.

1.2 Site Location
The proposed Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development project site is located adjacent to the Toyota Arena, north of Concourse Street and south of Fourth Street, in the City of Ontario.

The project site is located approximately 1,013 feet above sea level and the topography is relatively flat.

The project site location map is provided in Exhibit A.

The project site is located within the Ontario Center Specific Plan and zoned for Urban Commercial use. The City of Ontario General Plan land use map designates the project site as Mixed Use.

1.3 Project Description
The project consists of construction and operation of a mixed use town center development with residential and commercial/retail land use within four development lots. 2704
1-2
The proposed project includes a total of 691 residential dwelling units, 71,200 square feet of commercial/retail uses and the demolition and relocation of approximately 1,170 surface parking spaces. The total project site area is approximately 18.73 acres.

The site plan used for this analysis, provided by the applicant, is illustrated in Exhibit B.

Table 1 summarizes the proposed project land uses.

Table 1
Land Use Summary
Lot Dwelling Units Retail (SF)1 Parking Spaces
A 359 25,256 4772
B 98 20,802 1302
C 107 11,047 1422
D 127 14,095 1702
F & G -- -- 1,170
Total 691 71,200 2,089
1 S.F. – Square Feet
2 Parking Structure
This report analyzes long-term and short-term noise impacts associated with the day-to-day operation of the project. The primary sources of long-term noise impacts would be on-site circulation and parking lot noise and HVAC units.

1.4 Summary of Analysis Results
Table 2 provides a summary of the noise analysis results, per the CEQA impact criteria checklist. With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the project is not expected to result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. 2705
1-3
Table 2
CEQA Noise Impact Criteria
Noise Impact Criteria Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project result in?
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
X
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? X
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
X

1.5 Recommended Project Design Features
The following recommended project design features include standard rules and requirements, best practices and recognized design guidelines for reducing noise levels.

Design features are assumed to be part of the conditions of the project and integrated into its design. Design features are not typically considered mitigation under CEQA.

Operational Design Features

DF-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project shall prepare a final acoustical study that demonstrates building construction will achieve the minimum interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL for all residential units located along arterial roadways and/or adjacent to industrial uses, per the California Building Standards Code. The following noise control measures may be required for dwelling units located near adjacent roadways and industrial uses:
 Install sound barriers between residences and noise sources.  Install double-paned or similar sound rated windows.
2706
1-4
 Provide sound insulating exterior walls and roofing systems.  Locate and/or design attic vents to minimize sound propagation into each home.
 Provide forced-air ventilation systems.
 Place dwellings as far as practical from the noise source

DF-2 The project shall comply with California Title 24 building insulation requirements for exterior walls, roofs and common separating assemblies (e.g. floor/ceiling assemblies and demising walls).

DF-3 For proper acoustical performance, all exterior windows, doors, and sliding glass doors should have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum.

DF-4 The final building plans shall ensure that HVAC units are not located within an area of the project site that would contribute to a noise level exceedance at any adjacent property line, per the City of Ontario Municipal Code requirements. To meet the City’s noise standards the following measures should be followed:
 All HVAC equipment shall be shielded or enclosed from the line of sight of adjacent residential uses.

Construction Design Features
DF-5 Prepare a construction management plan and obtain a construction work permit from the City of Ontario prior to starting construction. The construction management plan shall ensure all contractors implement construction best management practices to reduce construction noise levels.

Best management practices shall include the following:
 All construction equipment shall be equipped with muffles and other suitable noise attenuation devices (e.g., engine shields).

2707
1-5
 Grading and construction contractors shall use quieter equipment as opposed to noisier equipment (such as rubber-tired equipment rather than track equipment), to the maximum extent feasible.
 If feasible, electric hook-ups shall be provided to avoid the use of generators. If electric service is determined to be infeasible for the site, only whisper-quiet generators shall be used (i.e., inverter generators capable of providing variable load.
 Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible.
 Locate staging area, generators and stationary construction equipment as far from the adjacent residential homes as feasible.  Construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes.
 Provide notifications and signage in readily visible locations along the perimeter of construction sites that indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where neighbors can enquire about the construction process and register complaints to a designated construction noise disturbance coordinator.
 Construction activities shall not take place between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and Saturday or Sunday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.

DF-6 No impact pile driving or blasting activities shall be permitted on the project site during construction. If impact pile driving or blasting is required, a follow-up noise and vibration impact assessment shall be conducted prior to start of any activity.
2708
2-1

2.0 Fundamentals of Noise
This section of the report provides basic information about noise and vibration and presents some of the terms used in the report.

2.1 Sound, Noise, and Acoustics
The sound is a disturbance created by a moving or vibrating source and is capable of being detected by the hearing organs. The sound may be thought of as mechanical energy of a moving object transmitted by pressure waves through a medium to a human ear. For traffic or stationary noise, the medium of concern is air. Noise is defined as sound that is loud, unpleasant, unexpected, or unwanted.

2.2 Frequency and Hertz
A continuous sound is described by its frequency (pitch) and its amplitude (loudness).

Frequency relates to the number of pressure oscillations per second. Low-frequency sounds are low in pitch (bass sounding) and high-frequency sounds are high in pitch (squeak).

These oscillations per second (cycles) are commonly referred to as Hertz (Hz). The human ear can hear from the bass pitch starting out at 20 Hz all the way to the high pitch of 20,000 Hz.

2.3 Sound Pressure Levels and Decibels
The amplitude of a sound determines its loudness. The loudness of sound increases or decreases, as the amplitude increases or decreases. Sound pressure amplitude is measured in units of micro-Newton per square inch meter (N/m2), also called micro-Pascal (μPa).

One μPa is approximately one hundred billionths (0.00000000001) of normal atmospheric pressure. Sound pressure level (SPL or Lp) is used to describe in logarithmic units the ratio of actual sound pressures to a reference pressure squared. These units are called decibels and abbreviated as dB.

2.4 Addition of Decibels
Because decibels are on a logarithmic scale, sound pressure levels cannot be added or subtracted by simple plus or minus addition. When two (2) sounds of equal SPL are combined, they will produce an SPL 3 dB greater than the original single SPL.

In other words, sound energy must be doubled to produce a 3dB increase. 2709
2-2
If two (2) sounds differ by approximately 10 dB the higher sound level is the predominant sound.

2.5 Human Response to Changes in Noise Levels1
In general, the healthy human ear is most sensitive to sounds between 1,000 Hz and 5,000 Hz, (A-weighted scale) and it perceives a sound within that range as being more intense than a sound with a higher or lower frequency with the same magnitude. For purposes of this report as well as with most environmental documents, the A-scale weighing is typically reported in terms of A-weighted decibel (dBA). Typically, the human ear can barely perceive the change in the noise level of 3 dB. A change in 5 dB is readily perceptible, and a change in 10 dB is perceived as being twice or half as loud. As previously discussed, a doubling of sound energy results in a 3 dB increase in sound, which means that a doubling of sound energy (e.g. doubling the volume of traffic on a highway), would result in a barely perceptible change in sound level.

2.6 Noise Descriptors
Noise in our daily environment fluctuates over time. Some noise levels occur in regular patterns, others are random. Some noise levels are constant, while others are sporadic. Noise descriptors were created to describe the different time-varying noise levels.

Following are the most commonly used noise descriptors along with brief definitions.

A-Weighted Sound Level
The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighted filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high-frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear. A numerical method of rating human judgment of loudness.

Ambient Noise Level
The composite of noise from all sources, near and far. In this context, the ambient noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location. 1 Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. 2710
2-3
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)
The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of five (5) decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 to 10:00 PM and after addition of ten (10) decibels to sound levels in the night before 7:00 AM and after 10:00 PM.

Decibel (dB)
A unit for measuring the amplitude of a sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is 20 micro-pascals.
dB(A)
A-weighted sound level (see definition above).

Equivalent Sound Level (LEQ)

The sound level corresponding to a steady noise level over a given sample period with the same amount of acoustic energy as the actual time-varying noise level. The energy average noise level during the sample period.

Habitable Room

Any room meeting the requirements of the Uniform Building Code or other applicable regulations which is intended to be used for sleeping, living, cooking or dining purposes, excluding such enclosed spaces as closets, pantries, bath or toilet rooms, service rooms, connecting corridors, laundries, unfinished attics, foyers, storage spaces, cellars, utility rooms, and similar spaces.

L(n)
The A-weighted sound level exceeded during a certain percentage of the sample time. For example, L10 in the sound level exceeded 10 percent of the sample time. Similarly, L50, L90, and L99, etc.
2711
2-4
Noise
Any unwanted sound or sound which is undesirable because it interferes with speech and hearing, or is intense enough to damage hearing, or is otherwise annoying. The State Noise Control Act defines noise as “...excessive undesirable sound...”.

Percent Noise Levels

See L(n).

Sound Level (Noise Level)
The weighted sound pressure level obtained by use of a sound level meter having a standard frequency-filter for attenuating part of the sound spectrum.

Sound Level Meter
An instrument, including a microphone, an amplifier, an output meter, and frequency weighting networks for the measurement and determination of noise and sound levels.

Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL)
The dBA level which, if it lasted for one (1) second, would produce the same A-weighted sound energy as the actual event.

2.7 Sound Propagation
As sound propagates from a source it spreads geometrically. The sound from a small, localized source (i.e., a point source) radiates uniformly outward as it travels away from the source in a spherical pattern. The sound level attenuates at a rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance. The movement of vehicles down a roadway makes the source of the sound appear to propagate from a line (i.e., line source) rather than a point source. This line source results in the noise propagating from a roadway in a cylindrical spreading versus a spherical spreading that results from a point source. The sound level attenuates for a line source at a rate of 3 dB per doubling of distance.
2712
2-5
As noise propagates from the source, it is affected by the ground and atmosphere. Noise models use the hard site (reflective surfaces) and soft site (absorptive surfaces) to help calculate predicted noise levels. Hard site conditions assume no excessive ground absorption between the noise source and the receiver. Soft site conditions such as grass, soft dirt or landscaping attenuate noise at an additional rate of 1.5 dB per doubling of distance. When added to the geometric spreading, the excess ground attenuation results in an overall noise attenuation of 4.5 dB per doubling of distance for a line source and 6.0 dB per doubling of distance for a point source.

Research has demonstrated that atmospheric conditions can have a significant effect on noise levels when noise receivers are located 200 feet and greater from a noise source.

Wind, temperature, air humidity, and turbulence can further impact how far sound can travel.

Figure 1 shows typical sound levels from indoor and outdoor noise sources. 2713
2-6
Figure 12
2 Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. 2714
2-7

2.8 Vibration Descriptors
Ground-borne vibrations consist of rapidly fluctuating motions within the ground that have an average motion of zero. The effects of ground-borne vibrations typically only cause a nuisance to people, but at extreme vibration levels, damage to buildings may occur.

Although ground-borne vibration can be felt outdoors, it is typically only an annoyance to people indoors where the associated effects of the shaking of a building can be notable.

Ground-borne noise is an effect of ground-borne vibration and only exists indoors since it is produced from noise radiated from the motion of the walls and floors of a room and may also consist of the rattling of windows or dishes on shelves.

Several different methods are used to quantify vibration amplitude.

PPV
Known as the peak particle velocity (PPV) which is the maximum instantaneous peak in vibration velocity, typically given in inches per second.

RMS
Known as the root mean squared (RMS) can be used to denote vibration amplitude.

VdB
A commonly used abbreviation to describe the vibration level (VdB) for a vibration source.

2.9 Vibration Perception
Typically, developed areas are continuously affected by vibration velocities of 50 VdB or lower. These continuous vibrations are not noticeable to humans whose threshold of perception is around 65 VdB. Outdoor sources that may produce perceptible vibrations are usually caused by construction equipment, steel-wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads, while smooth roads rarely produce perceptible ground-borne noise or vibration. To counter the effects of ground-borne vibration, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has published guidance relative to vibration impacts.
2715
2-8

2.10 Vibration Propagation
There are three main types of vibration propagation: surface, compression, and shear waves. Surface waves, or Rayleigh waves, travel along the ground’s surface. These waves carry most of their energy along an expanding circular wavefront, similar to ripples produced by throwing a rock into a pool of water. P-waves, or compression waves, are body waves that carry their energy along an expanding spherical wavefront. The particle motion in these waves is longitudinal (i.e., in a “push-pull” fashion). P-waves are analogous to airborne sound waves. S-waves, or shear waves, are also body waves that carry energy along an expanding spherical wavefront. However, unlike P-waves, the particle motion is transverse, or side-to-side and perpendicular to the direction of propagation.

As vibration waves propagate from a source, the vibration energy decreases in a logarithmic nature and the vibration levels typically decrease by 6 VdB per doubling of the distance from the vibration source. As stated above, this drop-off rate can vary greatly depending on the soil but has been shown to be effective enough for screening purposes, in order to identify potential vibration impacts that may need to be studied through actual field tests.

2.11 Construction Related Vibration Level Prediction3
Operational activities are separated into two different categories. The vibration can be transient or continuous in nature. Each category can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment used on the site. Operation of equipment causes ground vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance.

Buildings in the vicinity of the project area site respond to these vibrations with varying results ranging from no perceptible effects at the low levels to slight damage at the highest levels. The thresholds from Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, April 2020, in the table below provide general guidelines as to the maximum vibration limits for when vibration becomes potentially annoying. 3 Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, April 2020 2716
2-9
Table 3
Vibration Annoyance Potential Criteria
Human Response
PPV (in/sec)
Transient Sources Continuous/Frequent
Intermittent Sources
Barely perceptible 0.04 0.01
Distinctly perceptible 0.25 0.04
Strongly perceptible 0.90 0.10
Severe 2.00 0.40
Note: Transient sources create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls. Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogostick compactors, crack-and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment.

The Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, April 2020 provides general thresholds and guidelines as to the vibration damage potential from vibratory impacts. The table below provides general vibration damage potential thresholds:

Table 4
Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria
Structure and Condition
PPV (in/sec)
Transient Sources Continuous/Frequent
Intermittent Sources
Extremely fragile historic buildings ruin ancient
monuments 0.12 0.08
Fragile buildings 0.20 0.10
Historic and some old buildings 0.50 0.25
Older residential structures 0.50 0.30
New residential structures 1.00 0.50
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.00 0.50
Soil conditions have an impact on how vibration propagates through the ground. The Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, April 2020 provides suggested “n” values based on soil class. The table below outlines the manual’s suggested values and description.
2717
2-10
Table 5
Suggested “n” Values Based on Soil Classes
Soil Class Description of Soil Material Suggested Value of “n” I
Weak or soft soils: loose soils, dry or partially
saturated peat and muck, mud, loose beach sand,
and dune sand.

1.4 II Most sands, sandy clays, silty clays, gravel, silts, weathered rock. 1.3
III
Hard soils: densely compacted sand, dry
consolidated clay, consolidated glacial till, some
exposed rock.

1.1 IV Hard, component rock: bedrock, freshly exposed
hard rock. 1.0
2718
3-1

3.0 Regulatory Setting
The proposed project is located in the City of Ontario and noise regulations are addressed through the various federal, state, and local government agencies. The agencies responsible for regulating noise are discussed below.

3.1 Federal Regulations
The adverse impact of noise was officially recognized by the federal government in the Noise Control Act of 1972, which serves three (3) purposes:
 Publicize noise emission standards for interstate commerce  Assist state and local abatement efforts
 Promote noise education and research
The Federal Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ONAC) was originally tasked with implementing the Noise Control Act. However, it was eventually eliminated leaving other federal agencies and committees to develop noise policies and programs. Some examples of these agencies are as follows: The Department of Transportation (DOT) assumed a significant role in noise control through its various agencies. The Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) is responsible to regulate noise from aircraft and airports. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is responsible to regulate noise from the interstate highway system.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is responsible for the prohibition of excessive noise exposure to workers.

The Federal government and the State advocate that local jurisdiction use their land use regulatory authority to arrange new development in such a way that “noise sensitive” uses are either prohibited from being constructed adjacent to a highway or, or alternatively that the developments are planned and constructed in such a manner that potential noise impacts are minimized.

Since the Federal government and the State have preempted the setting of standards for noise levels that can be emitted by the transportation source, the City is restricted to regulating the noise generated by the transportation system through nuisance abatement ordinances and land use planning.
2719
3-2

3.2 State Regulations
Established in 1973, the California Department of Health Services Office of Noise Control (ONC) was instrumental in developing regularity tools to control and abate noise for use by local agencies. One significant model is the “Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Matrix.” The matrix allows the local jurisdiction to clearly delineate compatibility of sensitive uses with various incremental levels of noise.

The State of California has established noise insulation standards as outlined in Title 24 and the Uniform Building Code (UBC) which in some cases requires acoustical analyses to outline exterior noise levels and to ensure interior noise levels do not exceed the interior threshold. The State mandates that the legislative body of each county and city adopt a noise element as part of its comprehensive general plan. The local noise element must recognize the land use compatibility guidelines published by the State Department of Health Services. The guidelines rank noise land use compatibility in terms of normally acceptable, conditionally acceptable, normally unacceptable, and clearly unacceptable.

Noise insulation design standards for residences have been established by the State of California Uniform Building Code (UBC) Chapter 12, Division II and by the Title 24 noise insulation standards of the California Administrative Code. The City is required by the State Housing Law to adopt these State codes as minimum performance standards. The City may enact stricter noise standards throughout the city or on a case-by-case basis if deemed necessary. In brief, the Title 24 noise standards require the following for multi-family dwellings:

1. Party wall and floor-ceiling assembly designs must provide a minimum STC of 50, based on lab tests. Field tested assemblies must provide a minimum noise isolation class (NIC) of 45.

2. Floor-ceiling assembly designs must provide for a minimum impact insulation class (IIC) of 50, based on lab tests. Field tested assemblies must provide a minimum FIIC of

45. 3. Entry doors from interior corridors must provide an STC of 26 or more.

4. Penetrations or openings in sound rated assemblies must be treated to maintain required ratings.
2720
3-3

5. Interior noise levels due to exterior sources must not exceed a community noise equivalent level (CNEL) or a day-night level (LDN) of 45 dBA, in any habitable room.

Thus, the interior limit is 45 dBA CNEL between dwelling units and from exterior noise sources to interior living spaces.

3.3 City of Ontario Noise Regulations
The project is required to comply with the noise standards and thresholds established within the City of Ontario Municipal Code and the Ontario Plan. The noise standards from the Municipal Code and the Ontario Plan are provided in Appendix A.

3.3.1 City of Ontario Municipal Code Noise Standards
The City of Ontario Municipal Code, Chapter 29: Noise, requires that a project shall not create loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise that disturbs the peace or quiet of any neighborhood, or that causes discomfort or annoyance to any person of normal sensitiveness.

Exterior Noise Standards:

Noise standards are defined in Section 5-29.04, Exterior Noise Standards of the Noise chapter of the Municipal Code and are applicable to the project site and surrounding noise sensitive uses.

Table 6 shows the exterior noise standards from the City of Ontario Municipal Code Chapter 29: Noise Exterior Noise Standards for the project site and surrounding residential land uses.

Table 6
City of Ontario Municipal Code Exterior Noise Standards Land Use
7:00 AM – 10:00 PM 10:00 PM – 7:00 AM
Leq (dBA) Leq (dBA)
Multi-Family Residential 65 50
Residential Portion of Mixed Use 70 70
Commercial Property 65 60
1 Applies to that portion of residential property falling within 100 feet of a commercial property use, if the noise originates from that commercial property use.
2721
3-4
Interior Noise Standards:

Noise standards are defined in Section 5-29.05 Interior Noise Standards of the Noise chapter of the Municipal Code and are applicable to the project site and surrounding noise sensitive uses.

Table 7 shows the exterior noise standards from the City of Ontario Municipal Code Chapter 29: Noise Interior Noise Standards for the project land uses.

Table 7
City of Ontario Municipal Code Interior Noise Standards Land Use
7:00 AM – 10:00 PM 10:00 PM – 7:00 AM
Leq (dBA) Leq (dBA)
Multi-Family Residential 45 40
Residential Portion of Mixed Use1 45 40
1 Applies to that portion of residential property falling within 100 feet of a commercial property use, if the noise originates from that commercial property use.

Construction Noise Regulations
Chapter 29: Noise, Section 5-29.06 of the City’s municipal code states that the following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of the noise code;  Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition or grading of any real property. Such activities shall instead be subject to the following provisions of § 5-29.09;
i. No person, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition or any other related building activity, shall operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner that produces loud noise that disturbs a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, or a Police or Code Enforcement Officer, on any weekday except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. or on Saturday or Sunday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
ii. No landowner, construction company owner, contractor, subcontractor, or employer shall permit or allow any person or persons working under their 2722
3-5
direction and control to operate any tool, equipment or machine in violation of the provisions of this section.

3.3.2 City of Ontario General Plan (The Ontario Plan)
The Ontario Plan establishes planning criteria for determining a development’s noise/land use compatibility based on the community noise equivalent level (CNEL). CNEL noise levels are typically used to evaluate mobile source noise impacts such as from roadways, airports and rail lines.

Table 8 summarizes the City’s Noise/Land Use Compatibility guidelines for the project and surrounding land uses.

Table 8
Noise/Land Use Compatibility Guidelines
Land Use
Noise Limit (CNEL)
Normally
Acceptable
Conditionally
Acceptable
Normally
Unacceptable
Clearly
Unacceptable
Residential – Multiple Family <60 60-65 65-75 >75
Commercial – Retail <70 70-75 75-80 >80
Clearly Acceptable: No special noise insulation required, assuming buildings of normal conventional construction.

Normally Acceptable: Acoustical reports will be required for major new residential construction. Conventional construction with closed windows and fresh air supply systems of air conditioning will normally suffice.

Normally Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally be discouraged.

If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included.

Clearly Unacceptable: No new construction should be permitted. 2723
4-1

4.0 Study Method and Procedures
The following section describes the measurement procedures, measurement locations, and noise modeling procedures and assumptions used in the noise analysis.

4.1 Measurement Procedures and Criteria
Noise measurements are taken to determine the existing noise levels. A noise receiver or receptor is any location in the noise analysis in which noise might produce an impact. The following criteria are used to select measurement locations and receptors:
 Locations expected to receive the highest noise impacts, such as the first row of houses
 Locations that are acoustically representative and equivalent of the area of concern  Human land usage
 Sites clear of major obstruction and contamination
RK conducted the sound level measurements in accordance with Caltrans technical noise specifications. All measurement equipment meets American National Standards Institute (ANSI) specifications for sound level meters (S1.4: Specification of Sound Level Meters, 1983).

A Piccolo-II Type 2 integrating-averaging level meter was used to conduct long-term (24- hour) noise measurements at the project site and property boundaries.

The Leq, Lmin, Lmax, L2, L8, L25, and L50 statistical data were recorded over the measurement time period intervals and the information was utilized to define the noise characteristics for the project. The following gives a brief description of the Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement procedures for sound level measurements:
 Microphones for sound level meters were placed five (5) feet above the ground for long-term noise measurements
 Sound level meters were calibrated before and after each measurement  Following the calibration of equipment, a windscreen was placed over the microphone
 Frequency weighting was set on “A” and slow response
 Temperature and sky conditions were observed and documented 2724
4-2
Appendix B includes photos, field sheets, and measured noise data.

4.2 Stationary Noise Modeling
The stationary noise was projected using a computer program that replicates the FHWA Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). The FHWA model arrives at the predicted noise level through a series of adjustments to the reference energy noise level. For stationary source, the following noise level was applied to the model. The model outputs the projected noise level based on the following key parameters:
 Referenced noise level – (e.g. how loud a source is at a specific distance)  Vertical and horizontal distances (sensitive receptor distance from noise source)  Noise barrier vertical and horizontal distances (noise barrier distance from sound source and receptor).
 Typical noise source spectra
 Topography
Table 9 indicates the referenced noise level used in this analysis.

Table 9
Stationary Source Noise Level
Source Distance from Source (feet) Noise Levels (dBA)
Leq
HVAC Condenser Unit 3.0 77.0
Parking Lot 6.0 63.8
To estimate the future noise levels during typical conditions, RK adjusted the reference noise levels from noise source to the nearest receptors. Adjusted noise levels are based on the distance of the receptor location relative to the noise source and local topography. The noise levels assume that the stationary sources are operating continuously when in reality not all noise sources will operate continuously throughout the day and night.

4.3 Construction Noise Modeling
The construction noise analysis utilizes the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model, together with several key construction parameters.

Key inputs include distance to the sensitive receiver, equipment usage, and baseline 2725
4-3
parameters for the project site. This study evaluates the potential exterior noise impacts during each phase of construction. Noise levels were projected at an average distance of 160 feet to the nearest residential (to the north of Log F and Lot G) sensitive receptor of equipment operating over an 8-hour period from to the nearest sensitive receptor property line
 Construction phasing and equipment usage assumptions are referenced from the Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development AQ & GHG Study, by RK Engineering, June 2021.

4.4 Interior Noise Modeling
The interior noise level is the difference between the projected exterior noise level at the structure’s façade and the noise reduction provided by the structure itself. Typical building construction will provide a conservative 12 dBA noise level reduction with a “windows open” condition and a very conservative 20 dBA noise level reduction with “windows closed”. RK estimated the interior noise level by subtracting the building shell design from the estimated exterior noise level.

The interior noise analysis is based on industry standards for building noise reduction established by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the 2013 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (TeNS), the California Office of Noise Control Catalog of STC and IIC Ratings for Wall and Floor/Ceiling Assemblies, and the California Building Standards Code, Title 24.

The TeNS manual shows that the noise reduction due to building exteriors with ordinary sash windows (windows closed) is at least 20 decibels. By providing upgraded STC rated windows, the project design is considered adequate to meet interior noise standards. The building’s exterior walls will be constructed per the latest building code insulation requirements and provide occupants with the most protection from exterior noise.

Insulated exterior walls, designed per the latest California Building Standards, would provide a minimum of STC 35-40. Windows, on the other hand, are one of the acoustically weakest parts of the structure. Therefore, for a conservative estimate of preliminary interior noise, the building’s noise reduction potential is limited to the STC of the windows.

4.5 Construction Vibration Modeling
The construction vibration assessment is based on the methodology set-forth within the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. The 2726
4-4
vibration impacts from vibratory rollers and compactors, heavy truck loading and bulldozer activity is analyzed. All vibratory activity is analyzed as a continuous and/or frequent event and is required to comply with the applicable guidance thresholds criteria. It is expected that vibration levels will be highest during paving phase. No impact pile driving is expected as part of this project.

Vibratory impacts were calculated from the site area property line to the closest sensitive receptors and structures using the reference vibration levels, soil conditions and the reference equation PPV= PPV ref (25/D)^n (in/sec) (from Caltrans Manual) where:

PPV = reference measurement at 25 feet from vibration source D = distance from equipment to property line
n= vibration attenuation rate through ground (n=1.0 was utilized for this study) 2727
5-1

5.0 Existing Noise Environment
The existing noise environment for the project site and surrounding area has been established based on noise measurement data collected by RK.

5.1 Long-Term (24-Hour) Noise Measurement Results
To determine the existing noise level environment, RK conducted four (4) 24-hour noise measurements at the project study area.

Noise levels were measured on April 7, 2021 using a Piccolo-II Type 2 integrating-averaging sound level meter. The information was utilized to establish the noise characteristics of the existing ambient environment.

The noise monitoring locations were selected based on the proximity and location to adjacent sensitive receptors. Exhibit C graphically illustrates the location of the long-term measurements.
 Long-term noise monitoring location one (LT-1) was taken along southwest corner of Fourth Street and Via Piemonte approximately 140 feet south of the centerline of Fourth Street.
 Long-term noise monitoring location two (LT-2) was taken east of Porsche Way, approximately 60 feet north of the La Quinta Inn property line.  Long-term noise monitoring location three (LT-3) was taken northwest corner of Concours Street and Ferrari Street, approximately 110 feet to the west from the centerline of Concours Street.
 Long-term noise monitoring location four (LT-4) was taken in the parking lot, approximately 450 feet to the north from the centerline of Concours Street.

Long term noise monitoring locations represent the existing noise levels near the adjacent noise sensitive land uses. Long-term noise measurement results are summarized in Table 10, Table 11, Table 12 and Table 13. Appendix B includes photographs, field sheets and measured noise data.
2728
5-2
Table 10
24 Noise Measurement Results LT-11

Time Leq (dBA) Time Leq (dBA)
12:00 AM 52.5 12:00 PM 58.9
1:00 AM 49.3 1:00 PM 59.5
2:00 AM 50.7 2:00 PM 57.4
3:00 AM 51.5 3:00 PM 58.4
4:00 AM 53.4 4:00 PM 62.6
5:00 AM 59.2 5:00 PM 59.9
6:00 AM 58.2 6:00 PM 59.8
7:00 AM 59.1 7:00 PM 58.6
8:00 AM 57.4 8:00 PM 58.2
9:00 AM 55.3 9:00 PM 56.2
10:00 AM 58.6 10:00 PM 55.1
11:00 AM 57.8 11:00 PM 51.8
24-Hour CNEL 62.5
1 LT-1 was taken along southwest corner of Fourth Street and Via Piemonte approximately 140 feet south of the centerline of Fourth Street. LT-1 was recorded on 04/07/2021.

Table 11
24 Noise Measurement Results, LT-21
Time Leq (dBA) Time Leq (dBA)
12:00 AM 50.1 12:00 PM 50.2
1:00 AM 49.4 1:00 PM 50.8
2:00 AM 49.7 2:00 PM 52.3
3:00 AM 50.5 3:00 PM 52.8
4:00 AM 49.5 4:00 PM 53.8
5:00 AM 57.7 5:00 PM 53.4
6:00 AM 54.7 6:00 PM 52.1
7:00 AM 53.0 7:00 PM 52.6
8:00 AM 50.1 8:00 PM 56.1
9:00 AM 48.5 9:00 PM 49.7
10:00 AM 50.5 10:00 PM 50.8
11:00 AM 50.6 11:00 PM 50.3
24-Hour CNEL 59.2 1 LT-2 was taken east of Porsche Way, approximately 60 feet north of La Quinta Inn property line. LT-2 was recorded on 04/07/2021.
2729
5-3
Table 12
24 Noise Measurement Results, LT-31

Time Leq (dBA) Time Leq (dBA)
12:00 AM 52.5 12:00 PM 56.2
1:00 AM 45.8 1:00 PM 56.8
2:00 AM 49.0 2:00 PM 55.1
3:00 AM 49.8 3:00 PM 58.1
4:00 AM 51.7 4:00 PM 57.3
5:00 AM 52.3 5:00 PM 59.2
6:00 AM 54.8 6:00 PM 57.1
7:00 AM 55.8 7:00 PM 57.2
8:00 AM 55.0 8:00 PM 56.7
9:00 AM 57.6 9:00 PM 53.1
10:00 AM 58.1 10:00 PM 53.0
11:00 AM 55.7 11:00 PM 57.5
24-Hour CNEL 60.6
1 LT-3 was taken northwest corner of Concours Street and Ferrari Street, approximately 110 feet to the west from the centerline of Concours Street. LT-2 was recorded on 04/07/2021.

Table 13
24 Noise Measurement Results, LT-41
Time Leq (dBA) Time Leq (dBA)
12:00 AM 39.2 12:00 PM 44.5
1:00 AM 38.8 1:00 PM 43.8
2:00 AM 40.0 2:00 PM 43.8
3:00 AM 39.1 3:00 PM 46.7
4:00 AM 38.6 4:00 PM 44.8
5:00 AM 40.5 5:00 PM 43.3
6:00 AM 44.0 6:00 PM 42.2
7:00 AM 44.8 7:00 PM 40.8
8:00 AM 48.4 8:00 PM 39.8
9:00 AM 59.3 9:00 PM 39.9
10:00 AM 50.7 10:00 PM 39.3
11:00 AM 44.9 11:00 PM 40.5
24-Hour CNEL 49.9
1 LT-4 was taken in the parking lot, approximately 450 feet to the north from the centerline of Concours Street. LT-4 was recorded on 04/07/2021.
2730
6-1

6.0 Operational Noise Impacts
This assessment analyzes the anticipated noise levels generated by the project. The main sources of noise generated by the project would include vehicular traffic noise along the adjacent roadways. Noise level impacts are compared to the City of Ontario noise standards.

The project must demonstrate that noise levels generated by the project site would not result in a permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.

6.1 Stationary Source Noise Impacts
The project is not expected to consist of significant sources of stationary noise. The main sources of potential stationary noise impacts from the project would mainly include on-site circulation and parking lot noise, HVAC units and outdoor conversational noise.

The types of on-site noise from the project are typically considered compatible with other adjacent commercial/mixed use and would not typically be categorized as loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise that disturbs the peace or quiet of any neighborhood, or that causes discomfort or annoyance to any person of normal sensitiveness. In particular, social activities and vehicular related noise are generally substantially less during the noise sensitive nighttime hours. Although, mechanical HVAC equipment does have the potential to operate 24-hours a day.

Rooftop mechanical HVAC equipment are expected to be located at the center of each building. The nearest noise sensitive residential receptors are located approximately 750 feet away to the west of the proposed Lot C HVAC units and the noise impacts from the operation of mechanical HVAC equipment is expected to be not significant at this distance.

Therefore, a preliminary evaluation of noise impacts at the adjacent commercial uses has been provided.

Parking lot noise would occur from vehicle engine idling and exhaust, doors slamming, tires screeching, people talking, and the occasional horn honking. Parking lot noise is expected to occur on Lot F and Lot G and is conservatively assessed from the first parking space to northern residential properties; approximately 160 feet away. 2731
6-2
The proposed site plan shows commercial/retail uses will face Via Piemonte and would be mostly shielded from the line of sight from the adjacent receptor property lines. Therefore, the outdoor conversational noise from the commercial/retail uses would not substantially contribute noise impacts to adjacent properties and was not included as a part of this analysis.

Table 14
Stationary Noise Impact Analysis1
Receptor Stationary Noise Source
Combined Exterior
Noise Level (Leq) dBA
Number2 Land Use Location
Noise
Level
(Leq)
dBA Daytime4 Nighttime4 Source Location Distance3
1 Residential
North of
Lot F &
Lot G
Parking
Lot
Lot F &
Lot G 160 34.8 34.8 34.8
2 Residential West of
Lot C
HVAC Lot C 510 32.2

32.6 32.6 Parking
Lot Lot F 735 21.9
City of Ontario Residential Exterior Standard Levels 65.0 50.0 Noise Level Exceeds Standard (?) No No
3 Commercial
South of
Lot C and
Lot D
HVAC Lot A 213 39.6

43.7 43.7
HVAC Lot C 243 38.5
HVAC Lot D 243 38.5
Parking
Lot
Lot F &
Lot G 530 24.7
4 Commercial East of
Lot D
HVAC Lot D 485 32.7

36.6 36.6 Parking
Lot Lot G 170 34.3
5 Commercial East of
Lot A
HVAC Lot A 213 39.6

42.4 42.4
HVAC Lot B 525 39.1
6 Commercial South of
Lot B
HVAC Lot A 580 31.1

39.0 39.0
HVAC Lot B 250 38.2
City of Ontario Commercial Exterior Standard Levels 65.0 60.0 Noise Level Exceeds Standard (?) No No
1 Stationary noise calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix C. 2 Refer Exhibit A for Receptor Location.
3 Distance from the receptor to the nearest noise source. 4 Daytime: (7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M.); Nighttime: (10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.) 2732
6-3
As shown in Table 14, operational noise levels generated by the project are not expected to exceed the City’s daytime standards and nighttime noise standards at the nearest receptor property line for both commercial and residential uses. Stationary noise calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix C.

6.2 Preliminary Interior Noise Analysis
Traffic noise along the adjacent roadways is expected to be the primary source of ambient noise impacting future residents at the project site. Traffic noise is analyzed to determine the project’s noise/land use compatibility setting and to determine future noise levels to habitable exterior and interior areas on the project site. This section of the analysis does not necessarily apply to CEQA, as recent court rulings have indicated that CEQA is primarily concerned with the project’s impact of the environment, not the environment’s impact on a project.

Future traffic noise along the roadways is obtained from The Ontario Plan Figure S-3a, Future Roadway Noise Contours and represents the noise levels at the project site.

Table 15 shows the estimated future traffic noise levels at the project site and the noise/land use compatibly rating based on the City of Ontario General Plan Table LU-7 standards. The Ontario Plan Noise Level Exposure and Land Use Compatibility Guidelines is provided in Appendix A.

Table 15
Future Traffic Noise Levels1
Receptor Exterior Noise Level (Ldn)
(dBA CNEL)
Noise/Land Use
Compatibility
Multifamily Residential 65-70 Normally Unacceptable
Retail 65-70 Normally Acceptable
1 Source: The City of Ontario General Plan Table LU-7
The project may experience noise levels that fall within the normally unacceptable range (65-75 CNEL) for the residential part of the project and clearly acceptable (65-70 CNEL) for the retail part of the project. Hence, upgraded building construction techniques are expected to be required to achieve interior noise level standards for the residential uses. 2733
6-4
Based on Section 5, the existing noise levels (CNEL) nearest the project site range from 60.6 CNEL to 62.5 CNEL. It should be noted that the existing noise levels were taken during typical weekday conditions and do not include noise levels during an event at the Toyota Arena event center, which may further increase noise levels (i.e., traffic) in the area.

Therefore, in order to be conservative, the higher limit of the future traffic noise levels at the project site (70 dBA CNEL) has been utilized to conduct preliminary interior noise analysis.

A preliminary interior noise analysis has been prepared for the sensitive receptor locations using a typical "windows open" and "windows closed" condition. A "windows open" condition assumes 12 dBA of noise attenuation from the exterior noise level. A "windows closed" condition" assumes 20 dBA of noise attenuation from the exterior noise level.

Table 16 indicates the interior noise levels for the residential uses on the project site.

Table 16
Preliminary Interior Noise Impact Analysis
Receptor Location
Exterior
Noise
Level at
Building
Facade
(CNEL)
Interior
Noise
Standard
(CNEL)
Required
Building
Shell
Noise
Reduction
(CNEL)
Interior Noise Level
with Standard
California
Construction
Windows (STC > 25)
STC
Rating for
Windows
Facing
Subject
Roadway "Windows
Open" 1
"Windows
Closed" 2
Multifamily Residential 70 45.0 25 58 50 28
1 A minimum of 12 dBA noise reduction is assumed with the "windows open" condition. 2 A minimum of 20 dBA noise reduction is assumed with the "windows closed" condition.

The project is expected to require a "windows closed" condition and upgraded STC rated windows to meet the City/State interior noise standard of 45 dBA. To accommodate a windows closed conditions, all units shall be equipped with adequate fresh air ventilation, per the requirements of the California Uniform Building Code (UBC).

Prior to issuance of building permits, the project proponent should demonstrate to the City building department that the proposed building shell and window assemblies will achieve exterior to interior noise reduction necessary to meet the State of California and City of Ontario requirements.

Furthermore, the project shall comply with California Title 24 insulation building requirements for multi-family dwelling units for common separating assemblies (e.g. floor/ceiling assemblies and demising walls).
2734
6-5

6.3 Los Angeles Ontario International Airport (LAONT)
The Los Angeles Ontario International Airport (LAONT) is centrally located in the City of Ontario. The airport is a medium-hub, full-service airport. Traffic at the airport includes general aviation, commercial passenger aviation, and air cargo freight movement. LAONT is a member of the Los Angeles World Airport (LAWA) system. LAWA is currently developing a Master Land Use Plan for LAONT that will provide a framework for the airport’s development and use through the year 2030.

The LAONT is located approximately one and a quarter (1.25) miles to the northeast of the project site. A noise/land use compatibility assessment has been performed based on the project’s location to the LAONT Airport. The noise contour maps for the LAONT Airport are provided in Exhibit D.

The project is located outside of the 60 dB Ldn noise contour limit; therefore, the exterior noise impact from the airport would be within the allowable limits for residential land uses and the project is considered compatible with the surrounding land use and noise environment. Noise from airport operations is expected to generate a less than significant on the proposed project.

6.4 Recommended Operational Design Features
The following recommended project design features include standard rules and requirements, best practices and recognized design guidelines for reducing noise levels.

Design features are assumed to be part of the conditions of the project and integrated into its design. Design features are not typically considered mitigation under CEQA.

DF-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project shall prepare a final acoustical study that demonstrates building construction will achieve the minimum interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL for all residential units located along arterial roadways and/or adjacent to industrial uses, per the California Building Standards Code. The following noise control measures may be required for dwelling units located near adjacent roadways and industrial uses:
 Install sound barriers between residences and noise sources.  Install double-paned or similar sound rated windows.
 Provide sound insulating exterior walls and roofing systems. 2735
6-6
 Locate and/or design attic vents to minimize sound propagation into each home.
 Provide forced-air ventilation systems.
 Place dwellings as far as practical from the noise source

DF-2 The project shall comply with California Title 24 building insulation requirements for exterior walls, roofs and common separating assemblies (e.g. floor/ceiling assemblies and demising walls).

DF-3 For proper acoustical performance, all exterior windows, doors, and sliding glass doors should have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum.

7.0 Construction Noise and Vibration Impacts
Temporary construction noise and vibration impacts have been assessed from the project site to the nearest sensitive residential use to the north of Lot F and Lot G. The degree of construction noise will vary depending on the type of construction activity taking place and the location of the activity relative to the surrounding properties.

Chapter 29: Noise, Section 5-29.06 of the City’s municipal code states that the following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of the noise code;  Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition or grading of any real property. Such activities shall instead be subject to the following provisions of § 5-29.09;
i. No person, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition or any other related building activity, shall operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner that produces loud noise that disturbs a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, or a Police or Code Enforcement Officer, on any weekday except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. or on Saturday or Sunday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
ii. No landowner, construction company owner, contractor, subcontractor, or employer shall permit or allow any person or persons working under their direction and control to operate any tool, equipment or machine in violation of the provisions of this section.

To help further assess potential construction noise level impacts under CEQA, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2006) criteria is used as a referenced threshold of significance in this report. The FTA provides reasonable criteria for assessing construction noise impacts based on the potential for adverse community reaction. For residential uses, the daytime noise threshold is 80 dBA Leq for an 8-hour period. In compliance with the City’s Municipal Code, it is assumed construction would not occur during the noise-sensitive nighttime hours.

7.1 Typical Construction Noise Levels
Table 17 shows typical construction noise levels compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for common type construction equipment. Typical construction noise levels 2737
7-2
are used to estimate potential project construction noise levels at the adjacent sensitive receptors.

Table 17
Typical Construction Noise Levels1
Type Noise Levels (dBA) at 50 Feet
Earth Moving
Compactors (Rollers) 73 - 76
Front Loaders 73 - 84
Backhoes 73 - 92
Tractors 75 - 95
Scrapers, Graders 78 - 92
Pavers 85 - 87
Trucks 81 - 94
Materials Handling
Concrete Mixers 72 - 87
Concrete Pumps 81 - 83
Cranes (Movable) 72 - 86
Cranes (Derrick) 85 - 87
Stationary
Pumps 68 - 71
Generators 71 - 83
Compressors 75 - 86
Impact Equipment
Pneumatic Wrenches 82 - 87
Jack Hammers, Rock Drills 80 - 99
Pile Drivers (Peak) 95-105
Other
Vibrators 68 - 82
Saws 71 - 82
1 Referenced Noise Levels from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

7.2 Construction Noise Impact Analysis
This assessment analyzes potential noise impacts during all expected phases of construction, including; demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Construction phasing and equipment usage assumptions are referenced from:
2738
7-3
• Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development AQ & GHG Impact Study, by RK Engineering Group, June 2021.

The project’s estimated construction noise levels have been calculated using the Federal Highway Administration Roadway Construction Noise Model Version 1.1. Tables 18 show the noise level impacts to the nearest residential property lines to the north at 160 feet.

Construction noise calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix D.

Table 18
Project Construction Noise Levels – Residential Uses to the North Phase Equipment Quantity
Equipment
Noise Level
at 160ft
(dBA Leq)
Combined
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saw 1 72.5
Excavator 3 66.6 76.3
Rubber Tired Dozer 2 67.6
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 67.6

77.5 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 69.9
Grading
Excavators 2 66.6

78.1 Graders 1 70.9
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 67.6
Scrappers 2 69.5
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 69.9
Building
Construction
Cranes 1 62.5

76.2 Forklifts 3 60.9
Generator Sets 1 67.5
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 69.9
Welders 1 59.9
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixer 2 64.7
Pavers 2 64.1 71.8
Paving Equipment 2 62.9
Architectural
Coating Air Compressors 1 63.6 63.6
Worst Case Construction Phase Noise Level - Leq (dBA) 78.1 FTA Construction Noise Criteria (Detailed Assessment: 8-Hour Leq) 80.0 Noise level exceeds FTA criteria? No
2739
7-4
As shown in Table 18, project construction noise levels are expected to be below the recommended 8-hour construction noise threshold provided by the FTA for adverse community reaction at the adjacent residential uses.

7.3 Construction Vibration
To determine the vibratory impacts during construction, reference construction equipment vibration levels were utilized and then extrapolated to the façade of the nearest adjacent structures. The nearest sensitive receptors are the commercial/retail structures located adjacent to the project site. All structures surrounding the project site are “new structures”.

No historical or fragile buildings are known to be located within the vicinity of the site.

The construction of the proposed project is not expected to require the use of substantial vibration inducing equipment or activities, such as pile drivers or blasting. The main sources of vibration impacts during construction of the project would be the operation of equipment such as bulldozer activity during demolition, loading trucks during grading and excavation, and vibratory rollers during paving.

The construction vibration assessment utilizes the referenced vibration levels and methodology set-forth within the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Federal Transit Administration, September 2018.

Table 19 shows the referenced vibration levels.
2740
7-5
Table 19
Typical Construction Vibration Levels1
Equipment Peak Particle Velocity (PPV)
(inches/second) at 25 feet
Approximate Vibration Level
(LV) at 25 feet
Piledriver (impact) 1.518 (upper range) 112

0.644 (typical) 104
Piledriver (sonic) 0.734 upper range 105

0.170 typical 93
Clam shovel drop (slurry wall) 0.202 94
Hydromill 0.008 in soil 66
(slurry wall) 0.017 in rock 75
Vibratory Roller 0.210 94
Hoe Ram 0.089 87
Large bulldozer 0.089 87
Caisson drill 0.089 87
Loaded trucks 0.076 86
Jackhammer 0.035 79
Small bulldozer 0.003 58
1 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Federal Transit Administration, September 2018 Table 20 shows the project’s construction-related vibration analysis at the nearest structures to the project construction area. Construction impacts are assessed from the closest area on the project site to the nearest adjacent structure at approximately 50 feet.

The worst case vibratory impact from the site is estimated to be 0.098 PPV (in/sec) at the structures to the west. No damage potential is expected.

Table 20
Construction Vibration Impact Analysis
Construction
Activity
Distance to
Nearest
Structure
(ft)
Duration
Calculated
Vibration
Level - PPV
(in/sec)
Damage Potential
Level
Annoyance
Criteria
Level
Large
Bulldozer 50 Continuous/Frequent 0.042 No Impacts Distinctly Perceptible
Vibratory
Roller 50 Continuous/Frequent 0.035 No Impacts Barely
Perceptible
Loaded Trucks 50 Continuous/Frequent 0.098
Extremely Fragile
Buildings, Ruins
Ancient Monuments
Distinctly
Perceptible
Caisson
Drilling 50 Continuous/Frequent 0.042 No Impacts Distinctly Perceptible
2741
7-6
As shown in Table 20, project related construction activity is not expected to cause any potential damage to the nearest structures. The annoyance potential of vibration from construction activities would range from “distinctly perceptible” to “Barely perceptible”.

Construction vibration calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix D.

7.4 Recommended Construction Design Features
The following recommended project design features include standard rules and requirements, best practices and recognized design guidelines for reducing noise levels.

Design features are assumed to be part of the conditions of the project and integrated into its design. Design features are not typically considered mitigation under CEQA DF-7 Prepare a construction management plan and obtain a construction work permit from the City of Ontario prior to starting construction. The construction management plan shall ensure all contractors implement construction best management practices to reduce construction noise levels.

Best management practices shall include the following:
 All construction equipment shall be equipped with muffles and other suitable noise attenuation devices (e.g., engine shields).

 Grading and construction contractors shall use quieter equipment as opposed to noisier equipment (such as rubber-tired equipment rather than track equipment), to the maximum extent feasible.
 If feasible, electric hook-ups shall be provided to avoid the use of generators. If electric service is determined to be infeasible for the site, only whisper-quiet generators shall be used (i.e., inverter generators capable of providing variable load.
 Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible.
 Locate staging area, generators and stationary construction equipment as far from the adjacent residential homes as feasible.  Construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes.
2742
7-7
 Provide notifications and signage in readily visible locations along the perimeter of construction sites that indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where neighbors can enquire about the construction process and register complaints to a designated construction noise disturbance coordinator.
 Construction activities shall not take place between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and Saturday or Sunday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.

DF-8 No impact pile driving or blasting activities shall be permitted on the project site during construction. If impact pile driving or blasting is required, a follow-up noise and vibration impact assessment shall be conducted prior to start of any activity.
2743
Exhibits
2744
engineering
group, inc.

N
Location Map
Exhibit A
TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT NOISE IMPACT STUDY, City of Ontario, CA 2957-2021-02
Lot-F Lot-G
Lot-A
Lot-B
Lot-C Lot-D
1 2
3 4
5 6
Legend:
1 = Receptor Location
2745
engineering group, inc.

N
Noise Monitoring Locations
Exhibit C
TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT NOISE IMPACT STUDY, City of Ontario, CA2957-2021-02 2746
engineering group, inc.

N
Noise Monitoring Locations
Exhibit C
Legend:

LT-1 = Long Term (24-Hr) Noise Monitoring Location
LT-1
LT-4
LT-2
LT-3
TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT NOISE IMPACT STUDY, City of Ontario, CA2957-2021-02 2747
engineering group, inc.

N
LAONT Airport Noise Contours
Exhibit D
TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT NOISE IMPACT STUDY, City of Ontario, CA2957-2021-02 SITE
2748
Appendices
2749
Appendix A

City of Ontario
Noise Standards
2750
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 1/13 CHAPTER 29: NOISE
5-29.01 Declaration of findings and policy
5-29.02 Definitions
5-29.03 Designated noise zones
5-29.04 Exterior noise standards
5-29.05 Interior noise standards
5-29.06 Exemptions
5-29.07 Loud and disturbing noise
5-29.08 Real property maintenance noise regulations
5-29.09 Construction activity noise regulations
5-29.10 Other public agency exceptions
5-29.11 Schools, day care centers, churches, libraries, museums, health care institutions; Special provisions
5-29.12 Sound amplifying equipment
5-29.13 Amplified sound
5-29.14 Motor vehicles
5-29.15 Noise level measurement
5-29.16 Prima facie violation
5-29.17 Penalty
5-29.18 Enforcement and administration
5-29.19 City Manager waiver
5-29.20 Noise abatement program
Sec. 5-29.01. Declaration of findings and policy.

It is hereby found and declared that:
(a) The making and creation of excessive, unnecessary or unusually loud noises within the limits of the City is a condition that has existed for some time, however, the extent and volume of such noises is increasing;
(b) The making, creation or maintenance of such excessive, unnecessary, unnatural or unusually loud noises that are prolonged, unusual and unnatural in their time, place and use affect and are a detriment to public health, comfort, convenience, safety, welfare and prosperity of the residents of the City; and
(c) The necessity in the public interest for the provisions and prohibitions hereinafter contained and enacted, is declared as a matter of legislative determination and public policy, and it is further declared 2751
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 2/13 that the provisions and prohibitions hereinafter contained and enacted are in pursuance of and for the purpose of securing and promoting the public health, comfort, convenience, safety, welfare and prosperity and the peace and quiet of the residents of the City. (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.02. Definitions.

As used in this chapter, specific words and phrases are defined as follows:
(a) "Ambient noise level" shall mean the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given environment and is a composite of sounds from all sources, excluding the alleged offensive noise or excessive sound, at the location and approximate time at which a comparison with the alleged offensive noise is to be made.
(b) "Applicable (noise) zone" shall mean the noise zone category based on the actual use of the property, provided that the actual use is a legal use in the City. (c) "A-weighted sound level" shall mean the sound pressure level in decibels (dBAs) as measured with a sound level meter using the A-weighted filter network (scale) at slow response and at a pressure of twenty (20) micropascals. The A-weighted filter de-emphasizes the very low and a very high frequency component of sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear, and is a numerical method of rating human judgment of loudness.
(d) "Decibel (dBA)" shall mean a unit for measuring the amplitude of a sound, equal to twenty (20) times the logarithm to the base ten (10) of the ratio of pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure of twenty (20) micropascals.
(e) "Equivalent sound or noise level (Leq)" shall mean the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60804 Standard for measurement, or the most recent revision thereof, for the sound level corresponding to a steady state noise level over a given sample period with the same amount of acoustic energy as the actual time varying noise level or the energy average noise level during the sample period. The measurement period for the purposes of this chapter is fifteen (15) minutes.
(f) "Impulsive noise" shall mean a noise of short duration usually less than one (1) second and of high intensity, with an abrupt onset and rapid decay. Such objectionable noises may also be repetitive.
(g) "Intrusive noise" shall mean that noise that intrudes over and above the ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duration, frequency, time of occurrence and tonal information content, as well as the prevailing ambient noise level. (h) "Maintenance" shall mean the upkeep, repair or preservation of existing property or structures. (i) "Noise" shall mean any unwanted sound or sound that is undesirable because it interferes with speech and hearing, or is intense enough to damage hearing or is otherwise annoying. (j) "Noise level (sound level)" shall mean the weighted sound pressure level obtained by use of a sound level meter having a standard frequency filter for attenuating part of the sound spectrum. For purposes of this chapter, all noise levels (sound levels) shall be A-weighted sound pressure level. (k) "Noise (sound) level meter" shall mean an instrument, including a microphone, an amplifier, an output meter and frequency weighting networks for the measurement and determination of noise and sound levels. For the purposes of this chapter, the sound level meter must meet the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60651 and 60804 Standards, or the most recent revisions thereof, for Type 1 sound level meters or an instrument and the associated recording and analyzing equipment that will provide equivalent data.
2752
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 3/13 (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.03. Designated noise zones.

The properties hereinafter described shall be assigned to the following noise zones:

Noise Zone I: All single-family residential properties; Noise Zone II: All multi-family residential properties and mobile home parks;
Noise Zone III: All commercial property;
Noise Zone IV: The residential portion of mixed use properties; Noise Zone V:

All manufacturing or industrial properties and all other uses.

The actual use of the property, and not necessarily its zoning designation, shall be the determining factor in establishing whether a property is in Noise Zone I, II, III, IV or V, provided that the actual use is a legal use within the applicable zone.
(§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.04. Exterior noise standards.
(a) The following exterior noise standards, unless otherwise specifically indicated, shall apply to all properties within a designated noise zone.

Allowable Exterior Noise Level (1) Allowed Equivalent Noise Level, Leq. (2)
Noise
Zone Type of Land Use 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.

I Single-Family Residential 65 dBA 45 dBA
II Multi-Family Residential, Mobile
Home Parks 65 dBA 50 dBA
III Commercial Property 65 dBA 60 dBA
IV Residential Portion of Mixed Use 70 dBA 70 dBA
V
Manufacturing and Industrial, Other
Uses 70 dBA 70 dBA
(1) If the ambient noise level exceeds the resulting standard, the ambient noise level shall be the standard.
(2) Measurements for compliance are made on the affected property pursuant to § 5-29.15. (b) It is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the City to create noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person, which noise causes the noise level, when measured at any location on any other property, to exceed either of the following:
2753
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 4/13 (1) The noise standard for the applicable zone for any fifteen-minute (15) period; and (2) A maximum instantaneous (single instance) noise level equal to the value of the noise standard plus twenty (20) dBA for any period of time (measured using A-weighted slow response). (c) In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the noise standard, the maximum allowable noise level under such category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level. (d) The Noise Zone IV standard shall apply to that portion of residential property falling within one hundred (100) feet of a commercial property or use, if the noise originates from that commercial property or use.
(e) If the measurement location is on a boundary between two (2) different noise zones, the lower noise level standard applicable to the noise zone shall apply. (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.05. Interior noise standards.
(a) The following interior noise standards, unless otherwise specifically indicated, shall apply to all properties within a designated noise zone.

Allowable Interior Noise Level (1) Allowed Equivalent Noise Level, Leq. (2) Noise Zone Type of Land Use 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.

I Single-Family Residential 45 dBA 40 dBA
II Multi-Family Residential, Mobile
Home Parks 45 dBA 40 dBA
IV Residential Portion of Mixed Use 45 dBA 40 dBA
(1) If the ambient noise level exceeds the resulting standard, the ambient noise level shall be the standard.
(2) Measurements for compliance are made on the affected property pursuant to § 5-29.15. (b) It is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the City to create noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person, which noise causes the noise level, when measured at any location on any other property, to exceed either of the following:
(1) The noise standard for the applicable zone for any fifteen-minute (15) period; (2) A maximum instantaneous (single instance) noise level equal to the value of the noise standard plus twenty (20) dBA for any period of time (measured using A-weighted slow response). (c) In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the noise standard, the maximum allowable noise level under such category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level. (d) The Noise Zone IV standard shall apply to that portion of residential property falling within one hundred (100) feet of a commercial property or use, if the noise originates from that commercial property or use.
(e) If the measurement location is on a boundary between two (2) different noise zones, the lower noise level standard applicable to the noise zone shall apply. 2754
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 5/13 (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.06. Exemptions.

The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of this chapter:
(a) Any activity conducted on public property, or on private property with the consent of the owner, by any public entity or its officers, employees, representatives, agents, subcontractors, permittees, licensees or lessees that the public entity has authorized are exempt from the provisions of this chapter. This includes, without limitation, sporting and recreational activities that are sponsored, cosponsored, permitted or allowed by the City or any school district within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. This also includes, without limitation, occasional outdoor gatherings, public dances, shows or sporting and entertainment events, provided such events are conducted pursuant to an approval, authorization, contract, lease, permit or sublease by the appropriate public entity, specifically the planning commission or City Council;
(b) Occasional outdoor gatherings, public dances, show, sporting and entertainment events, provided said events are conducted pursuant to a permit or license issued by the appropriate jurisdiction relative to the staging of said events;
(c) Any mechanical device, apparatus or equipment used, related to or connected with emergency machinery, vehicle, work or warning alarm or bell, provided the sounding of any bell or alarm on any building or motor vehicle shall terminate its operation within forty-five (45) minutes in any hour of its being activated;
(d) Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition or grading of any real property. Such activities shall instead be subject to the provisions of § 5-29.09; (e) Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition or grading of public rights-of-way or during authorized seismic surveys;
(f) All mechanical devices, apparatus or equipment associated with agriculture operations provided that:
(1) Operations do not take place between 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.; (2) Such operations and equipment are utilized for the protection or salvage of agricultural crops during periods of potential or actual frost damage or other adverse weather conditions; or (3) Such operations and equipment are associated with agricultural pest control through pesticide application, provided the application is made in accordance with permits issued by or regulations enforced by the California Department of Agriculture;
(g) Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property. Such activities shall instead be subject to the provisions of § 5-29.08;
(h) Any activity to the extent regulation thereof has been preempted by state or federal law; (i) Any noise sources associated with people and/or music associated with a party at a residential property. Such noise shall be subject to the provisions of OMC § 5-29.07; (j) Any noise source emanating from an ice cream truck within the City. Such noise shall be subject to the provisions of OMC § 4-18.04;
(k) Any noise sources associated with barking dogs or other intermittent noises made by animals on any properly within the City. Such noise shall be subject to the provisions of OMC Chapter 1, Title 6;
2755
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 6/13 (l) Noise sources related to uses approved by a permit or development agreement adopted prior to the date of adoption of this chapter and that contains acoustic or noise standard conditions of approval. This exemption shall only be applicable during the effective period of the City-approved permit or development agreement.
(§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.07. Loud and disturbing noise.
(a) It is unlawful for any person or property owner within the City to make, cause or allow to be made any loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive noise, disturbance or commotion that disturbs the peace or quiet of any area or that causes discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivities in the area, after a Police or Code Enforcement Officer has first requested that the person or property owner cease and desist from making such noise. The types of loud, disturbing, excessive, impulsive or intrusive noise may include, but shall not be limited to, yelling, shouting, hooting, whistling, singing, playing a musical instrument, or emitting or transmitting any loud music or noise from any mechanical or electrical sound making or sound-amplifying device. (b) The factors, standards, and conditions that may be considered in determining whether a violation of the provisions of this section has been committed, included, but not limited to, the following:
(1) The level of the noise;
(2) The level and intensity of the background (ambient) noise, if any; (3) The proximity of the noise to residential or commercial sleeping areas; (4) The nature and zoning of the area within which the noise emanates; (5) The density of inhabitation of the area within which the noise emanates; (6) The time of day and night the noise occurs;
(7) The duration of the noise;
(8) Whether the noise is constant, recurrent or intermittent; (9) Whether the noise is produced by a commercial or noncommercial activity; and (10) Whether the use is lawful under the provisions of Title 5 of this Code and whether the noise is one that could reasonably be expected from the activity or allowed use. (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.08. Real property maintenance noise regulations. (a) No person, while engaged in maintenance of real property, shall operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner that produces loud noise that disturbs a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, or a Police or Code Enforcement Officer, except between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
(b) Trimming or pruning that requires the use of chainsaws or mulching machines shall only be allowed between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on a weekday and between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday or Sunday.
(c) The use of electrical or gasoline powered blowers, such as commonly used by gardeners or other persons for cleaning lawns, yards, driveways, gutters and other property shall only be allowed between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on a weekday and between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday or Sunday.
2756
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 7/13 (d) No landowner, gardener, property maintenance service, contractor, subcontractor or employer shall permit or allow any person or persons working under his or her direction or control to operate any tool, equipment or machine in violation of the provisions of this section. (e) Exceptions. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the following:
(1) Emergency property maintenance required by the building official; (2) The maintenance, repair or improvement of any public work or facility by public employees, by any person or persons acting pursuant to a public works contract, or by any person or persons performing such work or pursuant to the direction of, or on behalf of, any public agency; provided, however, this exception shall not apply to the City, or its employees, contractors or agents, unless:
(i) The City Manager or department head determines that the maintenance, repair or improvement is immediately necessary to maintain public service, (ii) The maintenance, repair or improvement is of a nature that cannot feasibly be conducted during normal business hours, or
(iii) The City Council has approved project specifications, contract provisions, or an environmental document that specifically authorizes maintenance during hours of the day that would otherwise be prohibited pursuant to this section; and
(3) Any maintenance that complies with the noise limits specified in § 5-29.04. (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.09. Construction activity noise regulations.
(a) No person, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition or any other related building activity, shall operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner that produces loud noise that disturbs a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, or a Police or Code Enforcement Officer, on any weekday except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. or on Saturday or Sunday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. (b) No landowner, construction company owner, contractor, subcontractor, or employer shall permit or allow any person or persons working under their direction and control to operate any tool, equipment or machine in violation of the provisions of this section. (c) Exceptions.
(1) The provisions of this section shall not apply to emergency construction work performed by a private party when authorized by the City Manager or his or her designee; (2) The maintenance, repair or improvement of any public work or facility by public employees, by any person or persons acting pursuant to a public works contract, or by any person or persons performing such work or pursuant to the direction of, or on behalf of, any public agency; provided, however, this exception shall not apply to the City, or its employees, contractors or agents, unless:
(i) The City Manager or a department head determines that the maintenance, repair or improvement is immediately necessary to maintain public services, (ii) The maintenance, repair or improvement is of a nature that cannot feasibly be conducted during normal business hours, or
(iii) The City Council has approved project specifications, contract provisions, or an environmental document that specifically authorizes construction during hours of the day that would otherwise be prohibited pursuant to this section; and
(3) Any construction that complies with the noise limits specified in §§ 5-29.04 or 5-29.05. 2757
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 8/13 (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.10. Other public agency exceptions.

The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed to prohibit any work at different hours by or under the direction of any other public agency or public or private utility companies in cases of necessity or emergency.
(§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.11. Schools, day care centers, churches, libraries, museums, health care institutions; Special provisions.

It is unlawful for any person to create any noise that causes the outdoor noise level at any school, day care center, hospital or similar health care institution, church, library or museum while the same is in use, to exceed the noise standards specified in § 5-29.04 prescribed for the assigned Noise Zone I. (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.12. Sound amplifying equipment.

Loudspeakers, sound amplifiers, public address systems or similar devices used to amplify sounds shall be subject to the provisions of § 5-29.13. Such sound amplifying equipment shall not be construed to include electronic devices, including but not limited to, radios, tape players, tape recorders, compact disc players, MP3 players, electric keyboards, music synthesizers, record players or televisions, which are designed and operated for personal use, or used entirely within a building and are not designed or used to convey the human voice, music or any other sound to an audience outside such building, or which are used in vehicles and heard only by occupants of the vehicle in which installed.
(§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.13. Amplified sound.
(a) The City Council enacts the following legislation for the sole purpose of securing and promoting the public health, comfort, safety and welfare for its citizenry. While recognizing that the use of sound amplifying equipment may be entitled to certain protection by the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and assembly, the City Council finds that in order to protect the public safety and the correlative rights of the citizens of this community to privacy and freedom from public nuisance of loud and unnecessary noise, reasonable regulation of the time, place and manner of the use of amplifying equipment is necessary. In no event shall approval or authorization required herein be withheld by reason of the constitutionally protected content of any material proposed to be broadcast through amplifying equipment.
(b) It is unlawful for any person, other than personnel of law enforcement or governmental agencies, to install, use or operate a loudspeaker or sound amplifying device in a fixed or movable position or mounted upon any vehicle within the City for the purpose of giving instructions, directions, talks, addresses or lectures to any persons or assemblages of persons in or upon any street, alley, sidewalk, park, place or public property without a permit to do so from the Police Chief or his or her designee. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the provisions of this section shall also apply to the use of sound amplifying equipment upon public or private property when used in connection with outdoor or indoor public or private events, whether or not admission is charged or food or beverages are sold, when such activity is to be attended by more than one hundred (100) persons and the noise emanating from the event will be audible at the property plane, or in the case of a street dance or concert on the nearest residential property. Those activities listed in § 5-29.06(a) are exempt from the requirements of this section.
2758
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 9/13 (c) The Police Chief or his or her designee is authorized to approve and issue permits under this section.
(d) An application for a permit required by this section shall be filed with the Police Chief at least sixteen (16) days and no more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the date on which the sound amplifying equipment is intended to be used. Applications for events covered by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution are exempt from the time requirements of this section if it is shown that circumstances require a shorter filing period and the event will not constitute an unsafe condition. The application shall contain the following information:
(1) The name, address and telephone number of both the owner and the user of the sound amplifying equipment;
(2) The license number, if a sound truck is to be used; (3) A general description of the sound amplifying equipment which is to be used; (4) Whether sound amplifying equipment will be used for commercial or noncommercial purpose; (5) The dates and times upon and within which, and the streets or property over or upon which, the equipment is proposed to be operated;
(6) The name or names of one (1) or more persons who will be present during the conduct of any activities for which registration is sought and who will have authority to reduce the volume of any sound amplifying equipment during the course of the activities if required pursuant to this chapter and, otherwise, to insure compliance with the provisions of this chapter; (7) A statement by the applicant that he or she is willing and able to comply with the provisions of this chapter and the conditions of the permit; and
(8) A sketch of the area or facilities within which the activities are to be conducted, with approximate dimensions and illustration of the location and orientation of all sound-amplifying equipment.
(e) The Police Chief shall deny the permit application or revoke any permit if the chief finds any of the following:
(1) The application contains materially false or intentionally misleading information; (2) The use of sound amplifying equipment at an event or activity proposed will be located in or upon a premises, building or structure that is hazardous to the health or safety of the employees or patrons of the premises, business, activity, or event, or the general public, under the standards established by the Uniform Building or Fire Codes, or other applicable codes, as set forth in OMC Titles 4 and 8;
(3) The use of sound amplifying equipment at an event or activity proposed in or upon a premises, building or structure that lacks adequate on-site parking for participants attending the proposed event or activity under the applicable standards set forth in OMC Title 9; (4) The conditions of any motor vehicle movement are such that, in his or her opinion, the use of the equipment would constitute an unreasonable interference with traffic safety; (5) The conditions of pedestrian movement are such that the use of the equipment would constitute a detriment to traffic safety;
(6) The application submitted by the applicant reveals that the applicant would violate the provisions of this section or any other provision of federal, state and/or local law; (7) The applicant is unwilling or unable to comply with the provisions of this chapter or any conditions imposed upon any permit issued;
2759
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 10/13 (8) There had already been a permitted event at the intended location, or within a two hundred (200) yard radius of the intended location and the prior permitted event was located on residentially zoned property or on a street, alley, public parking lot or neighborhood park within three (3) months prior to the intended event. Community parks are exempt from this subsection (8); or (9) The applicant or location has had previous violations within the past calendar year, and in the judgment of the Police Chief, issuance would be contrary to the intent of this section. (f) In determining whether the use of the equipment would constitute an unreasonable interference with or detriment to traffic safety, the Police Chief shall consider, but shall not necessarily be limited to:
(1) The volumes, patterns and speed of vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the proposed area of use;
(2) The relationship of the proposed use of equipment and potential impacts upon traffic patterns; (3) Availability of sufficient room for the operation of the equipment without significantly interfering with the traffic patterns;
(4) Proximity to schools, playgrounds and similar facilities where use of such equipment might attract children into traffic patterns; or
(5) Proximity to busy intersections or other potentially hazardous conditions where use of such equipment might constitute a hazard by reason of its tendency to distract drivers of vehicles or pedestrians.
(g) Issuance or denial.
(1) If the application is approved, the Police Chief shall return an approved copy of the application to the applicant and shall issue a permit. The permit shall constitute permission for the use of the sound amplifying equipment as requested.
(2) Any application filed shall be either approved or disapproved within five (5) days of the filing thereof.
(3) If the application is disapproved, the Police Chief shall return a disapproved copy forthwith to the applicant with a written statement on the reason for disapproval. (i) Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Police Chief or his or her designee may file an appeal to the City Manager. A complete and proper appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of the action that is the subject of the appeal. If the applicant fails to file an appeal within the ten (10) day filing period provided herein, denial shall take effect immediately upon expiration of such filing period. All appeals shall be in writing and shall contain the following information: (a) name(s) of the person filing the appeal, (b) a brief statement in ordinary and concise language of the relief sought, and (c) the signatures of all parties named as appellants and their mailing addresses. After receiving the appeal, the City Clerk shall immediately forward the matter to the City Manager for handling.
(ii) The City Manager shall, upon receipt of the appeal, set the matter for hearing before the City Manager or a hearing officer. Any hearing officer shall be a licensed attorney or recognized mediator designated by the City Manager. The hearing shall be set for not more than ten (10) calendar days after the receipt of the appeal unless a longer time is requested or consented to by the appellant. Notice of such hearing shall be given in writing and mailed at least five (5) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, by U.S. mail, with a proof of service attached, addressed to the address listed on the permit application, or the written appeal if different from the permit application.

The notice shall state the grounds of the complaint or reason for the denial and shall state the time and place where such hearing will be held.
2760
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 11/13 (iii) The City Manager or hearing officer shall, within ten (10) calendar days following the conclusion of the hearing, make a written finding and decision, which shall be delivered to the City and the appellant by first class mail. Notwithstanding any provision in this Code, the decision of the City Manager or hearing officer shall be the final administrative decision of the City. Any party dissatisfied with the decision of the City Manager or hearing officer may seek review of such decision under the provisions of Code Civil Procedure, §§ 1094.5 and 1094.8, as amended from time to time. (h) In addition to any other provisions of this Code, the use of sound-amplifying equipment and sound trucks in the City shall be subject to the following regulations:
(1) The only sounds permitted are music and human speech; (2) Sound shall not be emitted within one hundred (100) yards of hospitals, churches, schools and City Hall;
(3) The volume of sound shall be controlled so that it will not be audible for a distance in excess of one hundred (100) feet from the sound amplifying equipment or sound truck, and so that the volume is not unreasonably loud, raucous, jarring, disturbing or a nuisance to persons within the range of allowed audibility; or
(4) The sound amplifying equipment or sound truck shall not be used between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.
(§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.14. Motor vehicles.

The use of any motor vehicle in such a condition as to create excessive, impulsive or intrusive noises is prohibited. The discharge into the open air of the exhaust of any internal combustion engine, stationary or mounted on wheels, motorboat or motor vehicle, including motor cycle, whether or not discharged through a muffler or other similar device, which discharge creates excessive, unusual, impulsive or intrusive noise is prohibited. Motor vehicles shall comply with the noise regulations of the California Vehicle Code.
(§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.15. Noise level measurement.
(a) The location selected for measuring exterior noise levels in a residential area shall be at any part of a private yard, patio, deck or balcony normally used for human activity and identified by the owner or, if occupied by someone other than the owner, the occupant of the affected property as suspected of exceeding the noise level standard. This location may be the closest point in the private yard or patio, or on the deck or balcony, to the noise source, but should not be located in nonhuman activity areas such as trash container storage areas, planter beds, above or contacting a property line fence, or other areas not normally used as part of the yard, patio, deck or balcony. The location selected for measuring exterior noise levels in a nonresidential area shall be at the closest point to the noise source. The measurement microphone height shall be five (5) feet above finish elevation or, in the case of a deck or balcony, the measurement microphone height shall be five (5) feet above the finished floor level.
(b) The location selected for measuring interior noise levels shall be made within the affected residential unit. The measurements shall be made at a point at least four (4) feet from the wall, ceiling or floor, or within the frame of a window opening, nearest the noise source. The measurements shall be made with windows in an open position.
(c) Any decibel measurement made pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be measured in decibels (dBAs) as measured with a sound level meter using the A-weighted sound pressure level. 2761
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 12/13 (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.16. Prima facie violation.

Any noise exceeding the noise level standard as specified in §§ 5-29.04 and 5-29.05, shall be deemed to be prima facie evidence of a violation of the provisions of this chapter. (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.17. Penalty.
(a) Any person who negligently or knowingly violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of an infraction and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine specified in OMC § 1-2.01. Each day a violation occurs shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. (b) Any person who negligently or knowingly violates any provision of this chapter may also be subject to fine(s) specified in the administrative citation schedule of fines set forth in OMC § 1-5.04.

The manner of issuing administrative citations shall comply with all the procedures specified in OMC Chapter 5, Title 1.
(c) As an additional remedy, the operation or maintenance of any device, instrument, vehicle or machinery in violation of any provisions of this chapter, which operation or maintenance causes or creates sound levels exceeding the allowable standards as specified in this chapter, shall be deemed and is declared to be a public nuisance and may be subject to abatement by a restraining order or injunction issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. (d) Any violation of this chapter is declared to be a public nuisance and may be abated in accordance with law. The expense of enforcing this chapter is declared to be public nuisance and may be by resolution of the City Council declared to be a lien and special assessment against the property on which such nuisance is maintained, and any such charge shall also be a personal obligation of the property owner.
(§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.18. Enforcement and administration.
(a) It shall be the responsibility of Police or Code Enforcement Officers to enforce the provisions of this chapter and to perform all other functions required by this chapter. Such duties shall include, but not be limited to investigating potential violations, issuing warning notices and citations, and providing evidence to the City prosecutor for legal action.
(b) For violations of § 5-29.07, Police or Code Enforcement Officers shall obtain a declaration under penalty of perjury from two (2) declarants living in separate households within a sixty (60) day period stating in detail all of the following:
(1) That the declarant is a resident of a residential neighborhood located within two hundred (200) yards of the noise source; and
(2) Within the past month declarant has heard noise for substantially long periods to the extreme annoyance of the declarant.
(3) Declarations from two (2) declarants are required to prove a violation of § 5-29.07, but are not required to prove that a person has violated any other provision of this chapter. (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.19. City Manager waiver.
2762
5/26/2021 https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/bfe3da73-3e5d-4122-8f14-5815d50fca09/download/ 13/13 The City Manager is authorized to grant a temporary waiver to the provisions of this chapter for a period of time necessary to correct the violations of this chapter, if such temporary waiver would be in the public interest and there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the activity, or the method of conducting the activity, for which the temporary waiver is sought. This time period may include a commitment to a program that includes placing necessary orders and entering into necessary contracts within thirty (30) days for repair or installation. (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
Sec. 5-29.20. Noise abatement program.
(a) In circumstances where adopted community-wide noise standards and policies prove impractical in controlling noise generated from a specific source, the City Council may establish a noise abatement program that recognizes the characteristics of the noise source and affected property and that incorporates specialized mitigation measures.
(b) Noise abatement programs shall set forth in detail the approved terms, conditions and requirements for achieving maximum compliance with noise standards and policies. Said terms, conditions and requirements may include, but shall not be limited to, limitations, restrictions, or prohibitions on operating hours, location of operations, and the types of equipment. (§ 2, Ord. 2888, eff. March 6, 2008)
2763
NOISE LEVEL EXPOSURE AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES Table LU-7 Note: For noise compatibility criteria and contours for Ontario International Airport refer to the adopted ALUCP for ONT.

LAND USE CATEGORIES COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVEL (CNEL) Category Land Use
Residential/
Lodging
Single Family / Duplex
Multi-Family
Mobile Homes
Hotel/Motels
Public/Institutional Schools/Hospitals
Churches/ Libraries
Auditoriums/Concert Halls
Commercial Offices
Retail
Industrial Manufacturing
Warehousing
Recreational/
Open Space
Parks/Playgrounds
Golf Courses/ Riding Stables
Outdoor Spectator Sports
Outdoor Music Shells/
Amphitheaters
Livestock/Wildlife Preserves
Crop Agriculture
55 60 65 70 75 80
LEGEND
No special noise insulation required, assuming buildings of normal conventional construction.

Acoustical reports will be required for major new residential construction. Conventional construction with closed windows and fresh air supply systems of air conditioning will normally suffice.

New construction should be discouraged. Noise/aviation easements required for all new construction. If new construction does proceed, a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements must be made and necessary noise insulation features included.

No new construction should be permitted.

Clearly
Acceptable:

Normally
Acceptable:

Normally
Unacceptable:

Clearly
Unacceptable:
2764
2765
Appendix B

Field Data and Photos
2766
Project: Engineer: M. Torres Date: 4/7/2021
JN: 2957-2021-02
Measurement Address: City: Site No.:

Toyota Arena Ontario
Sound Level Meter: Calibration Record: Notes:

Piccolo II Input, dB/ Reading, dB/ Offset, dB/ Time
Serial # P0218042101 1 94.0 9:47 AM Temp: 55
Serial # P0218092808 2 94.0 10:18 AM Windspeed: 8 MPH
Serial # P0221010801 3 94.0 10:47 AM Direction: SSW
Serial # P0221010802 4 94.0 10:54 AM Skies: and Partly Cloudy Calibrator: Camera:

Photo Nos.

Serial # 500732
Notes: Measurement Type:

Long-term X
Short-term
Field Sheet
1 Meter Settings:
 A-WTD  LINEAR  SLOW  1/1 OCT  INTERVALS ___60____- MINUTE  C-WTD  IMPULSE  FAST  1/3 OCT  LN PERCENTILE VALUES Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
CA114 Sound Calibrator
1 c
c
c
c
2 3
4 2767
Project: Engineer: M. Torres Date: 4/7/2021
JN: 2957-2021-02
Measurement Address: City: Ontario Site No.:

Southwest Corner of Via Piemonte and Fourth Street.

47.0 Field Sheet - ST1 Location Photos
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
1 2768
PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2957‐2021‐02 NOISE METER Piccolo II SLM, 24‐Hour Measurement DATE: 07‐Apr‐21LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Resort Way and Haven Avenue BY: M. Torres Time Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50
12:00 AM 52.5 70.9 46.7 59.5 54.7 51.9 50.3
1:00 AM 49.3 70.7 43.1 56.2 52.1 48.4 46.42:00 AM 50.7 71.9 44.3 56.9 53.5 50.3 48.23:00 AM 51.5 71.0 45.2 58.0 54.0 51.0 49.24:00 AM 53.4 71.2 45.7 59.8 56.4 53.5 51.75:00 AM 59.2 87.4 49.7 62.4 57.8 55.3 53.66:00 AM 58.2 78.2 50.4 65.1 60.5 57.9 55.67:00 AM 59.1 78.4 46.5 67.3 61.6 57.4 54.78:00 AM 57.4 78.0 46.4 66.4 58.3 54.9 52.29:00 AM 55.3 77.5 45.8 63.3 57.1 53.8 51.4 10:00 AM 58.6 85.1 45.4 65.4 58.3 54.6 52.011:00 AM 57.8 80.5 46.1 66.6 59.9 55.3 52.8 12:00 PM 58.9 80.9 47.0 67.3 59.9 55.6 53.4
1:00 PM 59.5 77.9 48.2 68.2 62.7 57.6 54.72:00 PM 57.4 82.2 46.4 64.9 59.5 55.8 53.03:00 PM 58.4 77.6 48.3 66.4 61.8 57.2 54.54:00 PM 62.6 79.1 48.8 69.6 66.5 63.1 59.95:00 PM 59.9 77.0 49.3 67.7 63.1 59.6 56.96:00 PM 59.8 74.2 50.8 67.3 63.3 59.7 57.47:00 PM 58.6 76.9 50.2 66.1 61.3 57.7 55.58:00 PM 58.2 77.7 49.4 65.9 60.3 57.0 55.09:00 PM 56.2 77.0 46.5 63.8 57.1 54.0 51.8 10:00 PM 55.1 77.6 45.1 63.5 56.8 52.8 50.311:00 PM 51.8 70.8 44.8 57.8 54.4 51.6 49.4 Daytime 58.7 85.1 45.1 66.6 61.3 57.5 54.9Nighttime 54.7 87.4 43.1 60.5 56.2 53.5 51.5 2769

0.0 20.040.060.080.0
100.0
12:00 AM
1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
6:00 AM
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
Decibel (dB)
Time
24 Hour Noise Monitoring Results (Leq, Ln)
Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50
2770

0.0 10.020.030.040.050.060.070.0
12:00 AM
1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
6:00 AM
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
Noise Level (dBA)
SLM‐1: 24‐Hour Sound Level Measurement
Leq CNEL
2771
Project: Engineer: M. Torres Date: 4/7/2021
JN: 2957-2021-02
Measurement Address: City: Ontario Site No.:

East of Porsche Way, North of La Quinta Inn Site

47.0 Field Sheet - ST2 Location Photos
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
2 2772
PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2957‐2021‐02 NOISE METER Piccolo II SLM, 24‐Hour Measurement DATE: 07‐Apr‐21LOCATION: East of Porsche Way, North of La Quinta Inn Site BY: M. Torres Time Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50
12:00 AM 50.1 62.5 43.2 56.4 54.0 50.9 47.6
1:00 AM 49.4 62.8 40.5 54.9 53.2 50.6 47.62:00 AM 49.7 64.1 41.5 55.5 53.7 50.9 47.33:00 AM 50.5 65.9 41.9 56.1 53.8 51.2 48.54:00 AM 49.5 60.6 44.0 54.3 52.2 50.2 48.55:00 AM 57.7 81.9 45.0 63.6 54.0 50.8 48.66:00 AM 54.7 67.2 46.7 61.7 59.6 54.2 51.67:00 AM 53.0 73.5 46.4 57.8 55.3 53.0 50.48:00 AM 50.1 72.5 43.9 54.7 51.0 49.5 48.09:00 AM 48.5 62.3 42.9 55.7 51.2 48.6 46.8 10:00 AM 50.5 71.2 43.8 57.1 53.2 50.1 48.011:00 AM 50.6 70.2 44.4 56.1 52.4 49.9 48.3 12:00 PM 50.2 66.2 45.9 55.1 52.4 50.4 49.2
1:00 PM 50.8 70.5 45.1 55.4 52.6 50.7 49.42:00 PM 52.3 77.5 43.8 58.9 52.9 49.7 48.33:00 PM 52.8 66.5 45.4 58.9 57.1 52.7 50.64:00 PM 53.8 70.8 47.8 59.1 56.1 53.8 52.35:00 PM 53.4 71.6 46.3 59.9 55.9 52.7 50.96:00 PM 52.1 67.4 47.6 56.6 54.0 52.3 51.27:00 PM 52.6 72.3 47.3 58.6 53.8 51.8 50.88:00 PM 56.1 81.6 47.6 60.1 54.6 52.2 50.89:00 PM 49.7 68.1 43.4 55.4 52.0 49.4 47.5 10:00 PM 50.8 70.4 43.6 55.0 52.9 50.2 47.811:00 PM 50.3 66.0 43.2 55.4 53.6 51.2 48.6 Daytime 52.1 81.6 42.9 57.5 53.9 51.3 49.7Nighttime 52.7 81.9 40.5 58.7 54.9 51.4 48.7 2773

0.0 10.020.030.040.050.060.070.0
12:00 AM
1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
6:00 AM
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
Noise Level (dBA)
24‐Hour Noise Monitoring Result (CNEL)
Leq CNEL
2775
Project: Engineer: M. Torres Date: 4/7/2021
JN: 2957-2021-02
Measurement Address: City: Ontario Site No.:

Northwest Corner of Concours Street and Ferrari Lane

47.0 Field Sheet - ST3 Location Photos
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
3 2776
PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2957‐2021‐02 NOISE METER Piccolo II SLM, 24‐Hour Measurement DATE: 07‐Apr‐21LOCATION: Northwest Corner of Concours Street and Ferrari Lane BY: M. Torres Time Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50
12:00 AM 52.5 69.4 45.2 60.0 55.0 51.9 50.1
1:00 AM 45.8 68.9 41.3 51.3 47.0 44.9 44.02:00 AM 49.0 67.3 42.4 56.5 52.4 48.1 46.23:00 AM 49.8 72.6 43.0 56.2 52.5 47.9 46.54:00 AM 51.7 72.0 44.4 59.3 52.6 49.9 48.85:00 AM 52.3 69.0 46.1 60.1 55.4 51.1 49.56:00 AM 54.8 70.0 47.2 61.9 58.6 54.7 52.67:00 AM 55.8 74.4 45.2 63.0 59.5 55.3 52.28:00 AM 55.0 77.7 45.5 62.2 59.2 54.6 50.49:00 AM 57.6 83.6 44.7 62.6 59.0 54.6 51.2 10:00 AM 58.1 82.2 45.7 64.3 59.8 55.5 51.911:00 AM 55.7 72.1 46.5 63.1 59.8 55.6 52.0 12:00 PM 56.2 72.4 47.4 62.7 59.9 56.9 53.9
1:00 PM 56.8 75.7 47.1 63.0 59.8 56.9 54.52:00 PM 55.1 79.1 46.4 61.5 58.5 55.1 52.33:00 PM 58.1 89.2 48.4 61.7 58.7 55.7 53.34:00 PM 57.3 72.7 50.3 63.3 60.5 57.7 55.55:00 PM 59.2 87.9 47.2 64.8 60.6 57.3 54.46:00 PM 57.1 71.9 50.3 63.0 60.3 57.4 55.47:00 PM 57.2 80.6 49.0 62.8 59.7 56.9 55.08:00 PM 56.7 75.7 49.6 62.8 59.7 56.2 54.09:00 PM 53.1 71.2 44.6 60.2 56.8 53.3 50.4 10:00 PM 53.0 74.1 43.6 64.6 54.5 48.8 46.911:00 PM 57.5 67.8 43.8 66.2 65.7 52.0 50.2 Daytime 56.7 89.2 43.6 63.0 59.4 55.9 53.2Nighttime 52.9 72.6 41.3 60.8 58.5 50.9 49.2 2777

0.0 10.020.030.040.050.060.070.0
12:00 AM
1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
6:00 AM
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
Noise Level (dBA)
24‐Hour Noise Monitoring Result (CNEL)
Leq CNEL
2779
Project: Engineer: M. Torres Date: 4/7/2021
JN: 2957-2021-02
Measurement Address: City: Ontario Site No.:

In the parking lot along Western Project Site Boundary

47.0 Field Sheet - ST4 Location Photos
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
4 2780
PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2957‐2021‐02 NOISE METER Piccolo II SLM, 24‐Hour Measurement DATE: 07‐Apr‐21LOCATION: In the parking lot, along Western Project Site Boundary BY: M. Torres Time Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50
12:00 AM 51.7 66.2 46.6 57.2 54.4 51.9 50.3
1:00 AM 45.0 57.3 38.9 50.4 49.3 44.9 43.32:00 AM 49.4 61.7 41.5 55.4 52.1 49.9 48.13:00 AM 49.3 64.0 42.8 55.5 52.1 50.0 47.04:00 AM 51.1 60.2 44.3 54.7 53.6 52.5 50.45:00 AM 53.6 62.1 49.5 56.9 55.6 54.3 53.06:00 AM 54.9 69.3 48.0 60.1 57.6 55.1 53.67:00 AM 54.1 64.4 46.2 60.8 58.5 54.2 51.88:00 AM 53.0 67.6 47.4 58.4 54.7 53.2 52.19:00 AM 54.3 75.2 44.3 61.2 57.0 53.9 51.8 10:00 AM 57.0 74.1 46.7 66.5 60.8 55.4 52.411:00 AM 64.1 80.6 48.1 72.3 70.7 65.1 56.8 12:00 PM 56.1 63.9 49.9 61.3 59.7 57.0 54.4
1:00 PM 57.4 70.8 47.6 63.1 61.3 58.6 55.82:00 PM 52.2 64.3 47.5 56.8 53.9 52.6 51.73:00 PM 52.9 63.1 48.3 57.0 55.1 53.5 52.24:00 PM 55.8 70.6 51.4 59.9 57.9 56.2 55.15:00 PM 56.5 73.2 48.9 61.9 58.2 56.3 54.66:00 PM 56.7 65.3 52.4 60.0 59.0 57.5 56.17:00 PM 55.8 67.1 50.8 59.3 57.5 56.3 55.38:00 PM 55.8 72.5 49.9 62.4 57.1 55.2 54.19:00 PM 54.2 75.7 45.5 60.4 55.8 53.9 51.1 10:00 PM 51.0 73.2 43.2 54.4 51.5 49.3 47.611:00 PM 51.4 64.7 45.8 56.3 54.4 51.9 50.5 Daytime 56.7 80.6 43.2 63.6 61.2 57.2 53.9Nighttime 51.6 69.3 38.9 56.5 54.2 52.1 50.5 2781

0.0 10.020.030.040.050.060.070.0
12:00 AM
1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
6:00 AM
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
Noise Level (dBA)
24‐Hour Noise Monitoring Result (CNEL)
Leq CNEL
2783
Appendix C

Stationary Noise Analysis Results
2784
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Parking Lot F and Parking Lot G DATE: 27‐May‐21 LOCATION: Residential Uses to the north of Lot F & G BY: D. Shivaiah NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 170.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 170.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 0.0 NOISE HTH EL= 3.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 6 63.8
PROJ  LEVEL 170 34.8
SHIELDING 170 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 170 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.8 0.0
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐29.0459534
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2785
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot C HVAC DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Residential West of Lot C BY: D. Shivaiah
NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 520.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 520.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 3 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
PROJ  LEVEL 520 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2
SHIELDING 520 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 520 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐44.7776418
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2786
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot F Parking Lot DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Residential West of Lot C BY: D. Shivaiah
NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 745.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 745.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 6 63.8
PROJ  LEVEL 745 ‐41.9 ‐41.9 ‐41.9 ‐41.9 21.9 ‐41.9
SHIELDING 745 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 745 ‐41.9 ‐41.9 ‐41.9 ‐41.9 21.9 ‐41.9
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐41.8801004
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2787
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot A HVAC DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial South of Lot C and Lot D BY: D. Shivaiah NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 223.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 223.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 3 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
PROJ  LEVEL 223 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6
SHIELDING 223 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 223 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐37.4236722
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2788
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot C HVAC DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial South of Lot C and Lot D BY: D. Shivaiah NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 253.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 253.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 3 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
PROJ  LEVEL 253 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5
SHIELDING 253 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 253 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐38.5199853
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2789
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot D HVAC DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial South of Lot C and Lot D BY: D. Shivaiah NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 253.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 253.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 3 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
PROJ  LEVEL 253 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5
SHIELDING 253 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 253 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐38.5199853
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2790
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot F & G Parking Lot DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial South of Lot C and Lot D BY: D. Shivaiah NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 540.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 540.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 6 63.8
PROJ  LEVEL 540 ‐39.1 ‐39.1 ‐39.1 ‐39.1 24.7 ‐39.1
SHIELDING 540 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 540 ‐39.1 ‐39.1 ‐39.1 ‐39.1 24.7 ‐39.1
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐39.0848502
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2791
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot D HVAC DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial East of Lot D BY: D. Shivaiah
NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 495.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 495.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 3 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
PROJ  LEVEL 495 32.7 32.7 32.7 32.7 32.7 32.7
SHIELDING 495 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 495 32.7 32.7 32.7 32.7 32.7 32.7
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐44.3496789
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2792
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot G Parking Lot DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial East of Lot D BY: D. Shivaiah
NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 180.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 180.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 6 63.8
PROJ  LEVEL 180 ‐29.5 ‐29.5 ‐29.5 ‐29.5 34.3 ‐29.5
SHIELDING 180 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 180 ‐29.5 ‐29.5 ‐29.5 ‐29.5 34.3 ‐29.5
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐29.5424251
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2793
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot A HVAC DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial East of Lot A BY: D. Shivaiah
NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 223.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 223.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 3 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
PROJ  LEVEL 223 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6
SHIELDING 223 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 223 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐37.4236722
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2794
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot B HVAC DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial East of Lot A BY: D. Shivaiah
NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 235.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 235.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 3 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
PROJ  LEVEL 235 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.1
SHIELDING 235 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 235 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.1
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐37.8789322
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2795
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot B HVAC DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial South of Lot B BY: D. Shivaiah
NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 590.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 590.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 3 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
PROJ  LEVEL 590 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1
SHIELDING 590 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 590 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐45.8746151
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2796
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS ‐ BASED UPON FHWA ‐ RD‐77‐108 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2964‐2021‐02 SOURCE: Lot B HVAC DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: Commercial South of Lot B BY: D. Shivaiah
NOISE INPUT DATA
OBS DIST= 260.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 260.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ********
BARRIER = 0.0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 3.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL  = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 55.0 NOISE HTH EL= 58.0
DROP‐OFF= 20.0   (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF  LEVEL 3 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
PROJ  LEVEL 260 38.2 38.2 38.2 38.2 38.2 38.2
SHIELDING 260 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ  LEVEL 260 38.2 38.2 38.2 38.2 38.2 38.2
NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION DUE TO DISTANCE = ‐38.7570419
NOISE OUTPUT DATA (dBA)
2797
NOISE INTERVAL AVERAGER (2.0)
PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2957‐2021‐2 LOCATION: Receptor 2 DATE: 27‐May‐21
SOURCE: Combined Noise Levels BY: D.Shivaiah
LEQ L(MAX) L(2) L(8) L(25) L(50)
1 32.2
2 21.9
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! 32.6 #NUM!
NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS (dBA)
NOISE SOURCE
Lot C
Lot F
TOTAL
2798
NOISE INTERVAL AVERAGER (2.0)
PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2957‐2021‐2 LOCATION: Receptor 3 DATE: 27‐May‐21
SOURCE: Combined Noise Levels BY: D.Shivaiah
LEQ L(MAX) L(2) L(8) L(25) L(50)
1 39.6
2 38.5
3 38.5
4 24.7
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 TOTAL #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! 43.7 #NUM!
Lot D
Lot F & Lot G
NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS (dBA)
NOISE SOURCE
Lot A
Lot C
2799
NOISE INTERVAL AVERAGER (2.0)
PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2957‐2021‐2 LOCATION: Receptor 4 DATE: 27‐May‐21
SOURCE: Combined Noise Levels BY: D.Shivaiah
LEQ L(MAX) L(2) L(8) L(25) L(50)
1 32.7
2 34.3
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 TOTAL #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! 36.6 #NUM!
NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS (dBA)
NOISE SOURCE
Lot D
Lot G
2800
NOISE INTERVAL AVERAGER (2.0)
PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2957‐2021‐2 LOCATION: Receptor 5 DATE: 27‐May‐21
SOURCE: Combined Noise Levels BY: D.Shivaiah
LEQ L(MAX) L(2) L(8) L(25) L(50)
1 39.6
2 39.1
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 TOTAL #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! 42.4 #NUM!
NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS (dBA)
NOISE SOURCE
Lot A
Lot B
2801
NOISE INTERVAL AVERAGER (2.0)
PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #: 2957‐2021‐2 LOCATION: Receptor 6 DATE: 27‐May‐21
SOURCE: Combined Noise Levels BY: D.Shivaiah
LEQ L(MAX) L(2) L(8) L(25) L(50)
1 31.1
2 38.2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 TOTAL #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! 39.0 #NUM!
NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS (dBA)
NOISE SOURCE
Lot A
Lot B
2802
Appendix D

Construction Noise and Vibration
Analysis Results
2803
Report date: 5/27/2021
Case Description: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Demolition Residential 80 60 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 160 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 160 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 160 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 160 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 160 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 160 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Concrete Saw 79.5 72.5
Excavator 70.6 66.6
Dozer 71.6 67.6
Excavator 70.6 66.6
Excavator 70.6 66.6
Dozer 71.6 67.6
Total 79.5 76.3
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
2804
Report date: 5/27/2021
Case Description: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Site Preparation Residential 80 60 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Dozer No 40 81.7 160 0
Tractor No 40 84 160 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 160 0
Tractor No 40 84 160 0
Tractor No 40 84 160 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 160 0
Tractor No 40 84 160 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Dozer 71.6 67.6
Tractor 73.9 69.9
Dozer 71.6 67.6
Tractor 73.9 69.9
Tractor 73.9 69.9
Dozer 71.6 67.6
Tractor 73.9 69.9
Total 73.9 77.5
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
2805
Report date: 5/27/2021
Case Description: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Grading Residential 80 60 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Excavator No 40 80.7 160 0
Grader No 40 85 160 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 160 0
Scraper No 40 83.6 160 0
Tractor No 40 84 160 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 160 0
Scraper No 40 83.6 160 0
Tractor No 40 84 160 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Excavator 70.6 66.6
Grader 74.9 70.9
Dozer 71.6 67.6
Scraper 73.5 69.5
Tractor 73.9 69.9
Excavator 70.6 66.6
Scraper 73.5 69.5
Tractor 73.9 69.9
Total 74.9 78.1
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
2806
Report date: 5/27/2021
Case Description: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Building Construction Residential 80 60 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 160 0
Pickup Truck No 40 75 160 0
Generator No 50 80.6 160 0
Tractor No 40 84 160 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 160 0
Pickup Truck No 40 75 160 0
Pickup Truck No 40 75 160 0
Tractor No 40 84 160 0
Tractor No 40 84 160 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Crane 70.4 62.5
Pickup Truck 64.9 60.9
Generator 70.5 67.5
Tractor 73.9 69.9
Welder / Torch 63.9 59.9
Pickup Truck 64.9 60.9
Pickup Truck 64.9 60.9
Tractor 73.9 69.9
Tractor 73.9 69.9
Total 73.9 76.2
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
2807
Report date: 5/27/2021
Case Description: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Paving Residential 80 60 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 160 0
Paver No 50 77.2 160 0
Roller No 20 80 160 0
Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 160 0
Paver No 50 77.2 160 0
Roller No 20 80 160 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Concrete Mixer Truck 68.7 64.7
Paver 67.1 64.1
Roller 69.9 62.9
Concrete Mixer Truck 68.7 64.7
Paver 67.1 64.1
Roller 69.9 62.9
Total 69.9 71.8
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
2808
Report date: 5/27/2021
Case Description: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Architectural Coating Residential 80 60 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 160 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Compressor (air) 67.6 63.6
Total 67.6 63.6
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
2809
VIBRATION IMPACTS FROM CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #:

Nearest Structure at 50 Feet
PPV = 0.042 in/sec
Equipment Type = 3
PPVref = 0.089
D = 50.00
n = 1.10
Type
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Jackhammer 0.035
Small Bulldozer 0.003
Crack and Seat 2.400
Large Bulldozer 0.089
Caisson Drilling 0.089
Loaded Trucks 0.076
Distance from Equipment to receiver in ft.

Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
EQUIPMENT PPV REFERENCE LEVELS
Equipment Reference PPV
at 25 ft. (in/sec)
Vibratory Roller 0.210
OTHER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
PPV = PPVref(25/D)n
(in/sec)
Caisson Drilling
Reference PPV at 25 ft.

LOCATION: ENGINEER: D. Shivaiah
VIBRATION INPUT/OUTPUT DATA
PROJECT: 2957‐2021‐02
ACTIVITY: Caisson Drilling DATE: 27‐May‐21
1 of 2
2810
VIBRATION IMPACTS FROM CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development JOB #:

Nearest Structure at 50 Feet
PPV = 0.042 in/sec
Equipment Type = 2
PPVref = 0.089
D = 50.00
n = 1.10
Type
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 PROJECT: 2957‐2021‐02
ACTIVITY: Large Bulldozer DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: ENGINEER: D. Shivaiah
VIBRATION INPUT/OUTPUT DATA
OTHER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
PPV = PPVref(25/D)n
(in/sec)
Large Bulldozer
Reference PPV at 25 ft.

EQUIPMENT PPV REFERENCE LEVELS
Equipment Reference PPV
at 25 ft. (in/sec)
Distance from Equipment to receiver in ft.

Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
Vibratory Roller 0.210
Caisson Drilling 0.089
Large Bulldozer 0.089
Crack and Seat 2.400
Loaded Trucks 0.076
Jackhammer 0.035
Small Bulldozer 0.003
1 of 2
2811
VIBRATION IMPACTS FROM CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS
JOB #:

Nearest Structure at 50 Feet
PPV = 0.035 in/sec
Equipment Type = 4
PPVref = 0.076
D = 50.00
n = 1.10
Type
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 PROJECT: 2957‐2021‐02
ACTIVITY: Loaded Truck DATE: 27‐May‐21
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
LOCATION: ENGINEER: D. Shivaiah
VIBRATION INPUT/OUTPUT DATA
OTHER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
PPV = PPVref(25/D)n
(in/sec)
Loaded Trucks
Reference PPV at 25 ft.

EQUIPMENT PPV REFERENCE LEVELS
Equipment Reference PPV
at 25 ft. (in/sec)
Distance from Equipment to receiver in ft.

Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
Vibratory Roller 0.210
Caisson Drilling 0.089
Large Bulldozer 0.089
Crack and Seat 2.400
Loaded Trucks 0.076
Jackhammer 0.035
Small Bulldozer 0.003
1 of 2
2812
VIBRATION IMPACTS FROM CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS
JOB #:

Nearest Structure at 50 Feet
PPV = 0.098 in/sec
Equipment Type = 1
PPVref = 0.210
D = 50.00
n = 1.10
Type
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 PROJECT: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development 2957‐2021‐02 ACTIVITY: Vibratory Roller DATE: 27‐May‐21
LOCATION: ENGINEER: D. Shivaiah
VIBRATION INPUT/OUTPUT DATA
OTHER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
PPV = PPVref(25/D)n
(in/sec)
Vibratory Roller
Reference PPV at 25 ft.

Distance from Equipment to receiver in ft.

Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
EQUIPMENT PPV REFERENCE LEVELS
Equipment Reference PPV
at 25 ft. (in/sec)
Vibratory Roller 0.210
Large Bulldozer 0.089
Caisson Drilling 0.089
Loaded Trucks 0.076
Jackhammer 0.035
Small Bulldozer 0.003
Crack and Seat 2.400
1 of 2
2813
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix D

APPENDIX D

ENERGY STUDY
2814
group, inc.
engineering

TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

ENERGY CONSERVATION ANALYSIS
City of Ontario
2815
BE:/rk16668.doc
JN:2957-2021-03

TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

ENERGY CONSERVATION ANALYSIS
City of Ontario, California
Prepared for:

Mr. Robert Montano

ADEPT DEVELOPMENT
388 Cordova Street, Suite 280
Pasadena, CA 91101
Prepared by:

RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Bryan Estrada, AICP, PTP
Darshan Shivaiah, M.S
June 4, 2021
2816
Table of Contents
Section Page

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives 1-1

1.2 Site Location 1-1

1.3 Project Description 1-2

1.4 Utility Providers 1-2

1.5 Summary of CEQA Impacts 1-3

1.6 Recommended Project Design Features 1-3

2.0 Regulatory Setting.................................................................................... 3-1

2.1 Federal Regulations 3-1

2.2 State of California Regulations 3-3

3.0 Project Energy Consumption ................................................................. 4-1

3.1 Energy Consumption Methodology 4-1

3.2 Electricity Consumption 4-1

3.3 Natural Gas Consumption 4-2

3.4 Petroleum Consumption 4-3

3.4.1 Petroleum Consumption - Construction 4-3

3.4.2 Petroleum Consumption - Operation 4-6

3.5 Summary of Project Energy Consumption 4-7

4.0 Energy Impacts ...................................................................................... 5-1

4.1 Energy Impact Criteria 5-1

4.2 Energy Impact – 1 5-1

4.3 Energy Impact – 2 5-2

2817
List of Attachments
Tables
Land Use Summary ................................................................................................... 1 Utility Providers ......................................................................................................... 2 CEQA Energy Impact Criteria ..................................................................................... 3 U.S. Energy Policy Legislative Acts ............................................................................. 4 California Energy Policy Legislative Acts and Regulations ............................................ 5 Project Electricity Consumption ................................................................................. 6 Project Natural Gas Consumption.............................................................................. 7 Construction Off-Road Equipment Energy Consumption ............................................ 8 Construction On-Road Trips Energy Consumption ..................................................... 9 Operational Trips Energy Consumption – Annual ....................................................... 10 Total Project Energy Consumption – Annual .............................................................. 11 Appendices
CalEEMod Annual Emissions Report .......................................................................... A EMFAC2014 Vehicle Consumption Data .................................................................... B 2818
1-1

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives
The purpose of this energy conservation analysis is to review the energy implications of the proposed Toyota Arena Mixed-Use Development (project) and provide recommendations to reduce wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary consumption of energy during construction and operation. This analysis has been prepared within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.).

CEQA Guidelines, Appendix F, Energy Conservation, describes the framework within which energy conservation should be analyzed. Conserving energy implies the wise and efficient use of energy through decreasing overall per capita energy consumption, decreasing reliance on fossil fuels (such as coal, natural gas and oil), and increasing reliance on renewable energy sources. This analysis considers energy impacts to include:

1. The project’s energy requirements and its energy use efficiencies by amount and fuel type for each stage of the project including construction and operation.

2. The effects of the project on local and regional energy supplies and on requirements for additional capacity.

3. The effects of the project on peak and base period demands for electricity and other forms of energy.

4. The degree to which the project complies with existing energy standards.

5. The effects of the project on energy resources.

1.2 Site Location

The proposed project site is located adjacent to the Toyota Arena, north of Concourse Street and south of Fourth Street, in the City of Ontario.

The project site is located with Ontario Center Specific Plan and zoned for Urban Commercial within the Specific Plan. The City of Ontario General Plan land use map designates the project site as Mixed Use.
2819
1-2
The project location map is provided in Exhibit A.

1.3 Project Description
The project consists of construction and operation of a mixed use town center development with residential and commercial/retail land use within four development lots.

The site plan used for this analysis, provided by the applicant, is illustrated in Exhibit B.

Table 1 summarizes the land use assumptions used for this analysis.

Table 1
Land Use Summary
Lot Dwelling Units Retail (SF)1 Parking Spaces
A 359 25,256 4772
B 98 20,802 1302
C 107 11,047 1422
D 127 14,095 1702
E & F -- -- 1,170
Total 691 71,200 2,089
1 S.F. – Square Feet
2 Parking Structure
The site plan used in this analysis was provided by the applicant, and is illustrated in Exhibit B.

1.4 Utility Providers
The project will be served by the following utility providers, as shown in Table 2. 2820
1-3
Table 2
Utility Providers
Utility Provider
Electricity Southern California Edison
Natural Gas Southern California Gas Company
Water Ontario Public Works & OMUC
Sewer Ontario Public Works & OMUC
Telephone Frontier Communications
Cable Frontier Communications

1.5 Summary of CEQA Impacts
Table 3 provides a summary of the project’s impact to Energy resources, per the impact criteria described in CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G.

Table 3
CEQA Energy Impact Criteria
Energy Impact Criteria Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
X
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
X
2821
1-4

1.6 Project Design Features
The following project design features are considered standard building code requirements and best practices that will be included in the project design to will help reduce energy consumption. Design features are not typically considered mitigation under CEQA.

Construction Design Features
DF-1 Establish an electricity supply to the construction site and use electric powered equipment instead of diesel-powered equipment or generators, where feasible.

Operational Design Features
DF-2 Implement the GHG Reduction Measures from the Ontario County Climate Action Plan (CAP) Screening Tables to achieve at least 100 points, per the requirements for Mixed Use Projects.

DF-3 Comply with the mandatory requirements of California Building Standards Code Title 24 Part 6 (Energy Code) and Title 24 Part 11 (CAL Green).

DF-4 Implement water conservation strategies, including low flow fixtures and toilets, water efficient irrigation systems, drought tolerant/native landscaping, and limit the amount of turf/sod, per CAL Green and City of Ontario requirements.

DF-5 Implement zero waste strategies, recycling and composting programs for residential and non-residential uses.

DF-6 Encourage residents and landscape maintenance crews to use electric landscaping equipment, such as lawn mowers and leaf blowers, wherever feasible.

DF-7 No natural gas or wood burning fireplaces shall be installed in any residential dwelling.

DF-8 Implement trip reduction measures that reduce the number of auto-based trips and encourage the use of transit, bicycling, and walking. Such as; 2822
1-5

3. Provide bicycle racks for the retail and commercial uses and secure bicycle parking areas for the office and residential uses.

DF-9 Provide electric vehicle charging stations per the requirements of CALGreen. 2823
2-1

2.0 Regulatory Setting
Energy is controlled through various federal and state laws and regulations. This section provides a brief overview of key energy legislation and policies at the federal and state levels over the past 50 years.

2.1 Federal Regulations
Table 4
U.S. Energy Policy Legislative Acts
Date Legislative Act and Description
1975 Energy Policy and Conservation Act
Established the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and mandated vehicle fuel economy standards 1978 National Energy Act
Established tax incentives and disincentives, alternative fuel programs, energy efficiency initiatives, and other regulatory and market-based initiatives in response to the oil crisis earlier in the decade.

Comprised of 5 statutes:

Energy Tax Act
Created the Gas Guzzler tax for vehicles with mileage below specified levels and offered income tax credit for citizens using solar, wind, or geothermal energy sources at home Natural Gas Policy Act
Set up wellhead pricing maximums, rules for allocating costs of high-cost gas to industrial consumers, and provided authority to high priority users in times of supply emergency; gave FERC jurisdiction over almost all natural gas production National Energy Conservation Policy Act
Replaced Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) set forth in the EPCA of 1975, changed energy standards from voluntary to mandatory, Required federal agencies to do energy audits of their operations, Provided loans for families to purchase solar heating or cooling systems, and Established grants for schools, hospitals, local governments, and public housing authorities willing to use energy conservation measures Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act
Restricted construction of power plants fueled primarily by oil or natural gas and instead encouraged power plants fueled by coal, nuclear, and alternative fuels and restricted use of oil and natural gas in industrial boilers. Repealed in 1987 with the Natural Gas Utilization Act Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act
Promoted use of renewable energy, encouraged cogeneration plants. 1980 Energy Security Act
Title I: US Synthetic Fuels Corporation Act
Established the Synthetic Fuels Corporation (which only existed until 1985) for the purpose of partnering with industry for the creation of a market for domestically-produced synthetic liquid fuels; moved research and development for synthetic fuels away from the Department of Energy and into this public-private partnership with the hopes of speeding up results.

Title II: Biomass Energy and Alcohol Fuels Act
Provided loan guarantees for small-scale biomass energy projects; established the Office of Alcohol Fuels, the Office of Energy from Municipal Waste. 2824
2-2
Table 4
U.S. Energy Policy Legislative Acts
Date Legislative Act and Description
Title III: Energy Targets
Required the submission of energy targets for net imports.

Title IV: Renewable Initiatives
Established incentives for the use of renewable energy resources Title V: Solar Energy and Energy Conservation
Encouraged energy conservation and the use of solar energy, reducing dependence on foreign energy supplies.

Title VI: Geothermal Energy Act
Authorized loans from the Geothermal Resources Development Fund for exploration and determination of economic viability of a geothermal reservoir, cancels loan if reservoir is deemed unacceptable for development.

Title VII: Acid Precipitation Program
Established a task force to study the causes and risks of acid precipitation Title VIII: Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Established that 500,000,000 barrels of crude oil must be in storage before any can be sold and calls for the reserve to increase its supply 100,000 barrels per day until the storage capacity is reached
1992 Energy Policy Act
Amended the National Energy Conservation Policy Act of 1978. Created framework for wholesale electricity generation. Provided financial incentives to users/developers of clean-fuel vehicles; repealed alternative minimum tax for some producers. Intended to expand the use of natural gas. 2002 Farm Security and Rural Investment Act (Farm Bill) Included $405 million in mandatory funding over the following 5 years for the procurement of bio-based products, grants and loans for renewable energy and energy efficiency projects, research and development and the bioenergy program. Included, for reasons of national energy and security, rural economic development, and environmental sustainability in light of climate change impacts.
2005 Energy Policy Act
Offers tax benefits to individuals who increase energy efficiency in existing homes, buy or lease hybrid/alternative vehicles, required all public utilities to offer net metering on request, increased required amounts of renewable fuel in gasoline sold in the US, and encourages more domestic energy production
2007 Energy Independence and Security Act
Increased CAFE standards to 35 mpg (fleet-wide for passenger autos and light trucks) by 2020; instituted new conservation measures for federal fleet vehicles; authorized increased taxpayerfunded biofuel production (36 billion gallons by 2022 - 21 billion of which must be derived from non-cornstarch products).

Revised standards for appliances and lighting; all federal buildings must use Energy Star lighting products; training for green jobs; loans for small business energy efficiency improvements. 2008 Food, Conservation, and Energy Act (Farm Bill)
Includes provisions for loan guarantees for bio-refineries, payments to support expansion of advanced biofuels, expands the existing Rural Energy for America Program, provides grant monies for biofuel and bio-based product research and development 2009 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 2825
2-3
Table 4
U.S. Energy Policy Legislative Acts
Date Legislative Act and Description
$800 billion economic stimulus package aimed at job creation and the promotion of investment and consumer spending; included $4.3 billion in tax credits to homeowners for energy efficiency improvements in 2009-2010, $300 million for reducing diesel engine emissions, $21.5 billion for energy infrastructure, $27.2 billion for energy efficiency and renewable energy research and investment, $2 billion in research for DOE, $600 million in research for NOAA 2015 The Clean Power Plan
The first comprehensive plan to reduce carbon emissions from power plants by 32% in 2030, compared to 2005 levels. The plan was repealed under the Trump Administration. The Biden Administration has recently said it will not try to resurrect the plan, but will instead be proposing a new rule aimed at limiting GHG emissions from power plants. 1 Source: Robinson, Brandi. Penn State University. https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog432/node/116

2.2 State of California Regulations
California has a long-standing history of support for energy conservation and renewable energy.

Table 5 provides a summary of some of the key legislative acts, policies and regulations in the State of California for encouraging energy conservation and renewable energy. 2826
2-4
Table 5
California Energy Policy Legislative Acts and Regulations Date Legislative Act and Description
1974 Warren-Alquist Act
Established the California Energy Commission (CEC) as the state’s primary energy policy and planning agency. Responsible for preparing State Energy Plan. CEC’s goals are to reduce energy costs and environmental impacts of energy use, while ensuring a safe, resilient, and reliable supply of energy.
1978 Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations
Establishes the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) program, requiring 20% of retail sales from renewable energy by 2017.
2002 Senate Bill 1078
Required 20% of retail sales from renewable energy by 2017. 2003 Energy Action Plan I
Accelerated the 20% renewable deadline to 2010.
2005 Energy Action Plan II
Recommended further goal of 33% renewable by 2020.
2006 Senate Bill 107
Codified the accelerated 20% renewable by 2010 deadline into law. 2008 Executive Order S-14-08
Signed by Gov. Schwarzenegger, requires 33% renewables by 2020. 2009 Executive Order S-21-09
Directs the California Air Resources Board, under its AB 32 authority, to adopt regulations by July 31, 2010, consistent with the 33% renewable energy target established in Executive Order S-14-

08. 2011 Senate Bill X1-2
Signed by Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., codifies 33% renewable by 2020 RPS 2015 Senate Bill 350 – Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 Signed by Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. codifies 50% by 2030 RPS 2018 Senate Bill 100
Signed by Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. codifies 60% by 2030 & 100% by 2045 RPS 1 Source: California Energy Commission. https://www.energy.ca.gov/renewables/index.html 2827
3-1

3.0 Project Energy Consumption

3.1 Energy Consumption Methodology
The three (3) main types of energy expected to be consumed by the project include electricity, natural gas and petroleum products in the form of gasoline and diesel fuel.

Energy usage for the proposed project is calculated based on the CalEEMod and Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated June 2021 (Air/GHG Study).

The California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2020.4.0 (CalEEMod) is used to calculate energy usage from project construction and operational activities.

The CalEEMod Annual Reports for the project are provided in Appendix A.

3.2 Electricity Consumption
The project will use electricity for many different operational activities including, but not limited to, building heating and cooling, lighting, appliances, electronics, mechanical equipment, electric vehicle charging, and parking lot lighting. Indirect electricity usage will also be required to supply, distribute, and treat water and wastewater. Electricity will be provided to the site by Southern California Edison.

Temporary electricity usage for construction activities may include lighting, electric equipment and mobile office uses, however, CalEEMod does not calculate electricity usage during construction. Electricity usage during construction is expected to be short-term and relatively minor compared to the operational demand, and therefore electricity usage during construction is not counted in this analysis.

Table 6 shows the project’s estimated operational electricity consumption in kilowatt-hours per year (kWh/year) and millions of Btu per year.
2828
3-2
Table 6
Project Electricity Consumption
Land Use/Activity
Electricity Consumption1
(kWhr/yr)2 (MBtu/yr)2
Apartments Mid Rise 2,736,370.00 9,336.49
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 1,999,740.00 6,823.11
Parking Lot 163,800.00 558.89
Regional Shopping Center 864,368.00 2,949.22
Water Supply and Treatment 1,066,561.70 3,639.11
Total 6,830,839.70 23,306.83
1 Source: CalEEMod Defaults. Refer Appendix A
2 kWhr/yr = Kilowatt Hours per Year
MBtu/yr = Million British Thermal Units per Year

3.3 Natural Gas Consumption
The project will use natural gas for such things as building heating and cooling, cooking, kitchen appliances, and gas water heaters. Natural gas is not expected to be used during construction in any significant quantities and is not included in the overall calculation of the project’s natural gas consumption.

Table 7 shows the project’s estimated operational natural gas consumption in millions of Btu per year.

Table 7
Project Natural Gas Consumption
Land Use/Activity Natural Gas Consumption1
(MBtu/yr)2
Apartments Mid Rise 9,938.08
Regional Shopping Center 156.64
Total 10,094.72
1 Source: CalEEMod Defaults. Refer Appendix A
2 MBtu/yr = Millions of British Thermal Units per Year
2829
3-3

3.4 Petroleum Consumption
The project’s energy consumption from petroleum products is primarily associated with transportation related activities. This includes gasoline and diesel fuel usage for auto and truck trips during construction and operation and off-road equipment usage during construction.

3.4.1 Petroleum Consumption - Construction
Construction of the project is estimated to last approximately 21 months and consist of demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating phases. Construction activities will consume energy in the form of motor vehicle fuel (gasoline and diesel) for off-road construction equipment and on-road vehicle trips.

Vehicle trips include workers and vendors traveling to and from the job-site.

Table 8 shows the project’s energy consumption for all off-road equipment during construction. For purposes of this analysis, all off-road equipment is assumed to run on diesel fuel. Table 9 shows the project’s energy consumption from on-road vehicle trips during construction.
2830
Phase1
Phase
Duration
(Days)1
Equipment1 Amount1 Hours/ Day1 Horspower (HP)1 Load Factor1 HP-hrs2 Fuel
Consumption
Rate3
(hp-hr/gal)
Diesel Fuel
Consumption
(gal.)
Diesel Fuel
Consumption
by Phase
(gal.)
MBtu4
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.73 9,460.8 511.4Excavators 3 8 158 0.38 28,819.2 1,557.8 Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 247 0.40 31,616.0 1,709.0
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 247 0.40 23,712.0 1,281.7
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 97 0.37 11,484.8 620.8
Excavators 2 8 158 0.38 28,819.2 1,557.8
Graders 1 8 187 0.41 18,400.8 994.6
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.40 23,712.0 1,281.7
Scrapers 2 8 367 0.48 84,556.8 4,570.6
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 97 0.37 17,227.2 931.2
Cranes 1 7 231 0.29 140,679.0 7,604.3Forklifts 3 8 89 0.20 128,160.0 6,927.6Generator Sets 1 8 84 0.74 149,184.0 8,064.0Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 97 0.37 226,107.0 12,222.0Welders 1 8 46 0.45 49,680.0 2,685.4 Pavers 1 6 130 0.42 6,552.0 354.2Paving Equipment 1 8 132 0.36 7,603.2 411.0Rollers 1 7 132 0.36 6,652.8 359.6 Architectural Coating 75 Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48 16,848.0 910.7 910.7 125.113 54,555.4 7,494.875
1 Source: Appendix A Annual Results Sheet. (CalEEMod v.2020.4.0)2 HP-hrs = Horsepower Hours.3 Source: Carl Moyer Program Guidelines. 2017 Revisions. Table D-21. https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/moyer/guidelines/current.htm4 Mbtu = Millions of Btu; assuming 1 gallon of diesel fuel = 137,381 Btu. 5,152.233
154.520
TABLE 8
Construction Off-Road Equipment Energy Consumption
Demolition 3,778.2Grading 9,336.0
519.048
1,282.589
2030
Site Preparation 10 1,902.5 261.371
Total Energy Requirements
Building Construction 37,503.2
Paving 1,124.8
300
20 18.5
3-4
2831
Fuel Split2
Fuel
Consumption
by Veh. Class
(gal.)
Fuel
Consumption
by Phase
(gal.) Fuel Split2
Fuel
Consumption
by Veh. Class
(gal.)
Fuel
Consumption
by Phase
LDA 0.50 32.59 0.9938 67.24 0.0062 0.42
LDT1 0.25 27.46 0.9996 40.13 0.0004 0.02LDT2 0.25 25.60 0.9947 42.84 0.0053 0.23 LDA 0.50 32.59 0.9938 40.34 0.0062 0.25
LDT1 0.25 27.46 0.9996 24.08 0.0004 0.01LDT2 0.25 25.60 0.9947 25.70 0.0053 0.14 LDA 0.50 32.59 0.9938 134.48 0.0062 0.84
LDT1 0.25 27.46 0.9996 80.27 0.0004 0.03LDT2 0.25 25.60 0.9947 85.68 0.0053 0.46 LDA 0.50 32.59 0.9938 58,565.44 0.0062 365.37
LDT1 0.25 27.46 0.9996 34,956.06 0.0004 13.99LDT2 0.25 25.60 0.9947 37,312.03 0.0053 198.81 LDA 0.50 32.59 0.9938 67.24 0.0062 0.42
LDT1 0.25 27.46 0.9996 40.13 0.0004 0.02LDT2 0.25 25.60 0.9947 42.84 0.0053 0.23 LDA 0.50 32.59 0.9938 2,924.91 0.0062 18.25
LDT1 0.25 27.46 0.9996 1,745.80 0.0004 0.70LDT2 0.25 25.60 0.9947 1,863.46 0.0053 9.93 138,058.66 610.10 16,710.08
MHDT 0.50 9.58 0.2679 6,425.41 0.7321 17,558.94
HHDT 0.50 6.94 0.0010 33.11 0.9990 33,074.96
Demolition 20 1,483 20.0 593,200 HHDT 1.00 6.94 0.0010 85.48 85.48 0.9990 85,390.03 85,390.03 11,741.26 144,602.65 136,634.02 36,185.27
1 Source: Appendix A Annual Results Sheet. (CalEEMod v.2020.4.0) 2 Source: EMFAC2017 Web Database. https://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2017/. (See Appendix B for more details.)3 Mbtu = Millions of Btu; assuming 1 gallon of gasoline fuel = 120,429 Btu and 1 gallon of diesel fuel = 137,381 Btu

14.7 4,410 150.21
Gasoline Diesel

0.66 Trip Length Phase VMT 1

18.18 Total MBtu3
Average Fuel
Economy
(MPG)2
Vehicle
Mix1 Vehicle Class1
Phase
Duration
(Days)1
Construction
Phase1
Grading 30 20
Trips /Day1
Demolition 20 15
Site
Prerparation 10 18
8,820 300.42 1.33 36.36
Building
Construction 300 871 14.7 3,841,110 130,833.53

14.7 578.17 15,835.58
Paving 20 15 14.7 4,410 150.21 0.66 18.18
790.87
Diesel (gal.)
6,534.17
Sub-Total Worker Trips Energy Consumption Gasoline (gal.) Architectural
Coating 75 174 14.7 191,835
Table 9
Construction On-Road Trips Energy Consumption
Total On-Road Construction Trips Energy Consumption Gasoline (gal.) Diesel (gal.) 50,633.90 7,733.93
Hauling Trips
Vendor TripsWorker Trips
Building
Construction 300 222 6.9 459,540 6,458.51

28.88 14.7 2,646 90.13 0.40 10.91
3-5
2832
3-6

3.4.2 Petroleum Consumption - Operation
The project is expected to consume energy from auto and truck trips generated by the proposed land uses, as described in the Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development Traffic Impact Study Scoping Agreement, by RK, May 2021 and the Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated June 2021. Operational vehicle trips are associated with workers, customers and vendors/non-workers (i.e., delivery, service, maintenance vehicles, etc.) traveling to and from the site.

Table 10 shows the project’s petroleum energy consumption for all operational trips generated by the project on an annual basis.

Table 10
Operational Trips Energy Consumption - Annual
Vehicle
Class
Vehicle
Mix
Average
Fuel
Economy
(MPG)
Mitigated
Annual
VMT
Gasoline Diesel
Fuel Split MBtu
Fuel
Consumption
(gal.) Fuel Split
Fuel
Consumption
(gal.)
LDA 55.05% 32.59
10,221,754

0.9938 171,606.07 0.0062 1,070.60 20,813.43
LDT1 5.72% 27.46 0.9996 21,269.87 0.0004 8.51 2,562.68
LDT2 17.64% 25.60 0.9947 70,077.78 0.0053 373.39 8,490.69 MDV 14.23% 20.81 0.9815 68,604.36 0.0185 1,293.10 8,439.60 LHD1 2.76% 13.81 0.7188 14,708.48 0.2812 5,754.07 2,561.83 LHD2 0.34% 14.18 0.5328 1,294.18 0.4672 1,134.84 311.76 MHD 0.53% 9.58 0.2679 1,524.84 0.7321 4,166.97 756.10
HHD 0.81% 6.94 0.0010 11.92 0.9990 11,909.43 1,637.56
OBUS 0.03% 5.11 1.0000 523.61 0.0000 0.00 63.06
UBUS 0.01% 5.18 0.9866 231.56 0.0134 3.15 28.32
MCY 2.59% 36.38 1.0000 7,278.11 0.0000 0.00 876.50
SBUS 0.04% 8.15 0.3076 172.34 0.6924 387.94 74.05
MH 0.24% 6.07 0.8447 3,377.72 0.1553 621.00 492.09
Total Operational Trips Energy Usage
Gasoline
Consumption
(gal.)
360,680.84
Diesel
Consumption
(gal.)
26,723.00 47,107.67
1 Source: Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis, by RK Engineering Group, Inc. (CalEEMod .2020.4.0) 2 Source: EMFAC2017 Web Database. https://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2017/. (See Appendix B for more details.) 3 MBtu/yr = Millions of Btu per year; assuming 1 gallon of gasoline fuel = 120,429 Btu and 1 gallon of diesel fuel = 137,381 Btu 2833
3-7

3.5 Summary of Project Energy Consumption
Table 11 provides a summary of the project’s annual operational energy consumption.

Table 11
Annual Energy Consumption
Activity
Energy Consumption
(MBtu/yr)1
Total Annual Operational Energy Consumption 80,509.21
Electricity 23,306.83
Natural Gas 10,094.72
Petroleum 47,107.67
1 MBtu/yr = Millions of Btu per year. Operational activities only. 2834
4-1

4.0 Energy Impacts

4.1 Energy Impact Criteria
This analysis has been prepared within the context of the CEQA Guidelines, Appendix F, Energy Conservation, and Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form. According to CEQA, the goal of conserving energy implies the wise and efficient use of energy through decreasing overall per capita energy consumption, decreasing reliance on fossil fuels (such as coal, natural gas and oil), and increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.

A significant environmental impact would result if the project would; a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation, or;
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

4.2 Energy Impact – 1
Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
The project’s impact is considered less than significant with the inclusion of the mandatory requirements of California’s Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and Green Building Standards (CALGreen, Title 24, Part 11). California’s building energy efficiency standards are some of the strictest in the nation and the project’s compliance with California’s building code will ensure that wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy is minimized. The building standards code is designed to reduce the amount of energy needed to heat or cool a building, reduce energy usage for lighting and appliances.

The following recommended design features are provided to reduce wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary consumption of energy. Design features are consistent with the recommended design features provided with Air/GHG study. 2835
4-2
Construction Design Features
DF-1 Establish an electricity supply to the construction site and use electric powered equipment instead of diesel-powered equipment or generators, where feasible.

DF-3 Comply with the mandatory requirements of California Building Standards Code Title 24 Part 6 (Energy Code) and Title 24 Part 11 (CAL Green).

DF-5 Implement zero waste strategies, recycling and composting programs for residential and non-residential uses.

DF-6 Encourage residents and landscape maintenance crews to use electric landscaping equipment, such as lawn mowers and leaf blowers, wherever feasible.

DF-7 No natural gas or wood burning fireplaces shall be installed in any residential dwelling.

DF-8 Implement trip reduction measures that reduce the number of auto-based trips and encourage the use of transit, bicycling, and walking. Such as;

3. Provide bicycle racks for the retail and commercial uses and secure bicycle parking areas for the office and residential uses.

DF-9 Provide electric vehicle charging stations per the requirements of CALGreen.

4.3 Energy Impact – 2
Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
The project’s impact is considered less than significant as the project will purchase electricity through Southern California Edison which is subject to the requirements of California Senate Bill 100 (SB 100). SB 100 is the most stringent and current energy legislation in California; requiring that renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers and 100% of electricity procured to serve all state agencies by December 31, 2045.1

The project will further comply with the mandatory requirements of California’s Green Building and Building Energy Efficiency standards that promote renewable energy and energy efficiency.
1 SB-100 California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB100 2837
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Exhibits
2838
engineering
group, inc.

N
Location Map
Exhibit A
TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT ENERGY CONSERVATION ANALYSIS, City of Ontario, CA 2957-2021-03
Lot-F Lot-G
Lot-A
Lot-B
Lot-C Lot-D
2839
engineering group, inc.

N
Site Plan
Exhibit B
TOYOTA ARENA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT ENERGY CONSERVATION ANALYSIS, City of Ontario, CA2957-2021-03 2840
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Appendices
2841
Appendix A

CalEEMod Annual Emissions Output
2842
Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - The proposed project consists of a mixed-use town center development with 691 multifamily DU and 71,200 square feet of commercial/retail land uses on approximately 18.73 acres.

Construction Phase - The project's architectural coating phase will be extended to 75 days.

Demolition - The project is proposing to demolish approximetely 326,026 square feet of surface asphalt parking lot.

Vehicle Trips - The trip generation rates have been updated to reflect Toyota Arena TIA Scoping Agreement, by RK, May 25, 2021 and Traffic Impact Study and SANBAG VMT Model.

Fleet Mix - Operational fleet mix adjusted to equal 2% trucks with GVWR > 10,000 lbs.

Woodstoves - SCAQMD Rule 445 restricts wood burning hearths/fireplaces from being installed in new development.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust control.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
531.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2843
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2844
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 75.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/13/2023 6/29/2023
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 34.55 0.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 8.0940e-003
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 0.02
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 0.02
tblFleetMix HHD 0.00 8.0940e-003
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.55
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.54
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.54
tblFleetMix LDA 0.00 0.55
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.00 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.18
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.17
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.17
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.00 0.18
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 3.3700e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 7.1960e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2845
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 7.1960e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 0.00 3.3700e-003
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.00 0.03
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.00 0.14
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 2.3750e-003
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 5.0710e-003
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 5.0710e-003
tblFleetMix MH 0.00 2.3750e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 5.3340e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 0.01
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 0.01
tblFleetMix MHD 0.00 5.3340e-003
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 2.6200e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 5.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 5.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 0.00 2.6200e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 4.4700e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 9.5400e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 9.5400e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 0.00 4.4700e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 1.1900e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 2.5400e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 2.5400e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2846

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblFleetMix UBUS 0.00 1.1900e-004
tblLandUse LotAcreage 18.18 11.47
tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.27 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 10.53 7.26
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.63 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 4.37
tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP 40.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.37
tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP 19.20 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 4.37
tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 40.20 100.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 5.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 46.12 36.38
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 5.17
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 5.17
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 37.75 29.77
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2847

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1379 1.4343 0.9987 2.4700e0030.4484 0.0609 0.5093 0.1435 0.0564 0.1999 0.0000 224.5415 224.5415 0.0463 9.7200e003228.5934 2022 0.6978 3.6944 6.6165 0.0197 1.4235 0.1269 1.5504 0.3823 0.1195 0.5017 0.0000 1,821.185 0 1,821.185
0 0.1147 0.1062 1,855.707
7 2023 2.7410 0.5904 1.2453 3.4500e0030.2593 0.0218 0.2812 0.0694 0.0206 0.0900 0.0000 318.7457 318.7457 0.0230 0.0147 323.7039 Maximum 2.7410 3.6944 6.6165 0.0197 1.4235 0.1269 1.5504 0.3823 0.1195 0.5017 0.0000 1,821.185 0 1,821.185
0 0.1147 0.1062 1,855.707
7 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.0376 0.2555 1.0489 2.4700e0030.2033 5.1200e0030.2085 0.0635 5.0000e0030.0685 0.0000 224.5413 224.5413 0.0463 9.7200e003228.5933 2022 0.5186 1.9549 6.7591 0.0197 1.4235 0.0270 1.4506 0.3823 0.0258 0.4081 0.0000 1,821.184 7 1,821.184
7 0.1147 0.1062 1,855.707
3 2023 2.7062 0.2501 1.2939 3.4500e0030.2593 3.4000e0030.2627 0.0694 3.2600e0030.0727 0.0000 318.7457 318.7457 0.0230 0.0147 323.7038 Maximum 2.7062 1.9549 6.7591 0.0197 1.4235 0.0270 1.4506 0.3823 0.0258 0.4081 0.0000 1,821.184 7 1,821.184
7 0.1147 0.1062 1,855.707
3 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2848
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

8.79 56.98 -2.72 0.00 11.50 83.06 17.91 13.45 82.65 30.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 10-1-2021 12-31-2021 1.5660 0.2892
2 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 1.0897 0.6152
3 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 1.0873 0.6076
4 7-1-2022 9-30-2022 1.0992 0.6143
5 10-1-2022 12-31-2022 1.1139 0.6289
6 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 1.0104 0.6811
7 4-1-2023 6-30-2023 2.3186 2.2757
Highest 2.3186 2.2757
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2849

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 3.3006 0.2042 7.2070 1.1600e0030.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0000 152.7384 152.7384 0.0140 2.5900e003153.8599 Energy 0.0544 0.4656 0.2013 2.9700e0030.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0000 1,929.625 1 1,929.625
1 0.0966 0.0203 1,938.100
0 Mobile 2.4002 2.4859 20.0954 0.0365 3.8326 0.0279 3.8605 1.0209 0.0260 1.0469 0.0000 3,401.239 8 3,401.239
8 0.2559 0.1743 3,459.566
8 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 79.6983 0.0000 79.6983 4.7100 0.0000 197.4492 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 15.9564 242.7848 258.7412 1.6539 0.0405 312.1654 Total 5.7552 3.1557 27.5037 0.0406 3.8326 0.1149 3.9475 1.0209 0.1130 1.1339 95.6547 5,726.388 1 5,822.042
9 6.7306 0.2377 6,061.141
4 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2850

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2851
4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/24/2021 2/16/2023 5 300 5 Paving Paving 2/17/2023 3/16/2023 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/17/2023 6/29/2023 5 75 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 1,399,275; Residential Outdoor: 466,425; Non-Residential Indoor: 106,800; Non-Residential Outdoor: 35,600; Striped Parking Area: 50,136 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 7.26
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2852

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 1,483.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 871.00 222.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 174.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2853

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1605 0.0000 0.1605 0.0243 0.0000 0.0243 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e0040.0155 0.0155 0.0144 0.0144 0.0000 34.0008 34.0008 9.5700e0030.0000 34.2400 Total 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e0040.1605 0.0155 0.1760 0.0243 0.0144 0.0387 0.0000 34.0008 34.0008 9.5700e0030.0000 34.2400 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.7800e0030.1221 0.0296 4.5000e0040.0128 1.7400e0030.0145 3.5100e0031.6600e0035.1700e0030.0000 44.2265 44.2265 1.9200e0037.0100e00346.3629 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.1000e0045.1000e0045.8300e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.3559 1.3559 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.3693 Total 4.3900e0030.1226 0.0354 4.6000e0040.0144 1.7500e0030.0162 3.9500e0031.6700e0035.6200e0030.0000 45.5824 45.5824 1.9600e0037.0500e00347.7322 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2854

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0614 0.0000 0.0614 9.2900e0030.0000 9.2900e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.6200e0030.0200 0.2328 3.9000e0046.2000e0046.2000e0046.2000e0046.2000e0040.0000 34.0007 34.0007 9.5700e0030.0000 34.2400 Total 4.6200e0030.0200 0.2328 3.9000e0040.0614 6.2000e0040.0620 9.2900e0036.2000e0049.9100e0030.0000 34.0007 34.0007 9.5700e0030.0000 34.2400 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.7800e0030.1221 0.0296 4.5000e0040.0128 1.7400e0030.0145 3.5100e0031.6600e0035.1700e0030.0000 44.2265 44.2265 1.9200e0037.0100e00346.3629 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.1000e0045.1000e0045.8300e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.3559 1.3559 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.3693 Total 4.3900e0030.1226 0.0354 4.6000e0040.0144 1.7500e0030.0162 3.9500e0031.6700e0035.6200e0030.0000 45.5824 45.5824 1.9600e0037.0500e00347.7322 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2855

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0194 0.2025 0.1058 1.9000e0040.0102 0.0102 9.4000e0039.4000e0030.0000 16.7179 16.7179 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8530 Total 0.0194 0.2025 0.1058 1.9000e0040.0983 0.0102 0.1085 0.0505 9.4000e0030.0599 0.0000 16.7179 16.7179 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8530 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e0043.0000e0043.5000e0031.0000e0059.9000e0041.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0040.0000 0.8136 0.8136 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8216 Total 3.7000e0043.0000e0043.5000e0031.0000e0059.9000e0041.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0040.0000 0.8136 0.8136 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8216 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2856

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0376 0.0000 0.0376 0.0193 0.0000 0.0193 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3300e0030.0101 0.1043 1.9000e0043.1000e0043.1000e0043.1000e0043.1000e0040.0000 16.7178 16.7178 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8530 Total 2.3300e0030.0101 0.1043 1.9000e0040.0376 3.1000e0040.0379 0.0193 3.1000e0040.0196 0.0000 16.7178 16.7178 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8530 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e0043.0000e0043.5000e0031.0000e0059.9000e0041.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0040.0000 0.8136 0.8136 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8216 Total 3.7000e0043.0000e0043.5000e0031.0000e0059.9000e0041.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0040.0000 0.8136 0.8136 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8216 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2857

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1381 0.0000 0.1381 0.0548 0.0000 0.0548 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0629 0.6960 0.4632 9.3000e0040.0298 0.0298 0.0274 0.0274 0.0000 81.7425 81.7425 0.0264 0.0000 82.4034 Total 0.0629 0.6960 0.4632 9.3000e0040.1381 0.0298 0.1678 0.0548 0.0274 0.0822 0.0000 81.7425 81.7425 0.0264 0.0000 82.4034 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2300e0031.0100e0030.0117 3.0000e0053.2900e0032.0000e0053.3100e0038.7000e0042.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 2.7118 2.7118 8.0000e0058.0000e0052.7386 Total 1.2300e0031.0100e0030.0117 3.0000e0053.2900e0032.0000e0053.3100e0038.7000e0042.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 2.7118 2.7118 8.0000e0058.0000e0052.7386 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2858

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0528 0.0000 0.0528 0.0210 0.0000 0.0210 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0114 0.0495 0.4950 9.3000e0041.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0030.0000 81.7424 81.7424 0.0264 0.0000 82.4033 Total 0.0114 0.0495 0.4950 9.3000e0040.0528 1.5200e0030.0543 0.0210 1.5200e0030.0225 0.0000 81.7424 81.7424 0.0264 0.0000 82.4033 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2300e0031.0100e0030.0117 3.0000e0053.2900e0032.0000e0053.3100e0038.7000e0042.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 2.7118 2.7118 8.0000e0058.0000e0052.7386 Total 1.2300e0031.0100e0030.0117 3.0000e0053.2900e0032.0000e0053.3100e0038.7000e0042.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 2.7118 2.7118 8.0000e0058.0000e0052.7386 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2859

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.7000e0030.0523 0.0497 8.0000e0052.8800e0032.8800e0032.7000e0032.7000e0030.0000 6.9491 6.9491 1.6800e0030.0000 6.9910 Total 5.7000e0030.0523 0.0497 8.0000e0052.8800e0032.8800e0032.7000e0032.7000e0030.0000 6.9491 6.9491 1.6800e0030.0000 6.9910 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.5700e0030.0364 0.0122 1.3000e0044.2000e0036.1000e0044.8100e0031.2100e0035.9000e0041.8000e0030.0000 12.4033 12.4033 3.5000e0041.8400e00312.9601 Worker 0.0107 8.8300e0030.1016 2.6000e0040.0287 1.6000e0040.0288 7.6100e0031.5000e0047.7600e0030.0000 23.6201 23.6201 7.3000e0047.2000e00423.8534 Total 0.0123 0.0453 0.1138 3.9000e0040.0329 7.7000e0040.0336 8.8200e0037.4000e0049.5600e0030.0000 36.0234 36.0234 1.0800e0032.5600e00336.8135 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2860

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.8000e0046.7000e0030.0524 8.0000e0051.2000e0041.2000e0041.2000e0041.2000e0040.0000 6.9491 6.9491 1.6800e0030.0000 6.9910 Total 9.8000e0046.7000e0030.0524 8.0000e0051.2000e0041.2000e0041.2000e0041.2000e0040.0000 6.9491 6.9491 1.6800e0030.0000 6.9910 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.5700e0030.0364 0.0122 1.3000e0044.2000e0036.1000e0044.8100e0031.2100e0035.9000e0041.8000e0030.0000 12.4033 12.4033 3.5000e0041.8400e00312.9601 Worker 0.0107 8.8300e0030.1016 2.6000e0040.0287 1.6000e0040.0288 7.6100e0031.5000e0047.7600e0030.0000 23.6201 23.6201 7.3000e0047.2000e00423.8534 Total 0.0123 0.0453 0.1138 3.9000e0040.0329 7.7000e0040.0336 8.8200e0037.4000e0049.5600e0030.0000 36.0234 36.0234 1.0800e0032.5600e00336.8135 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2861

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e0030.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2428 301.2428 0.0722 0.0000 303.0471 Total 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e0030.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2428 301.2428 0.0722 0.0000 303.0471 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0492 1.3293 0.4713 5.3900e0030.1820 0.0151 0.1971 0.0525 0.0144 0.0669 0.0000 524.0510 524.0510 0.0141 0.0776 547.5317 Worker 0.4268 0.3350 4.0179 0.0108 1.2415 6.6400e0031.2482 0.3297 6.1200e0030.3359 0.0000 995.8912 995.8912 0.0284 0.0286 1,005.128 9 Total 0.4760 1.6644 4.4892 0.0162 1.4236 0.0217 1.4452 0.3823 0.0205 0.4028 0.0000 1,519.942 2 1,519.942
2 0.0425 0.1062 1,552.660
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2862

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0426 0.2905 2.2698 3.5000e0035.3000e0035.3000e0035.3000e0035.3000e0030.0000 301.2425 301.2425 0.0722 0.0000 303.0467 Total 0.0426 0.2905 2.2698 3.5000e0035.3000e0035.3000e0035.3000e0035.3000e0030.0000 301.2425 301.2425 0.0722 0.0000 303.0467 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0492 1.3293 0.4713 5.3900e0030.1820 0.0151 0.1971 0.0525 0.0144 0.0669 0.0000 524.0510 524.0510 0.0141 0.0776 547.5317 Worker 0.4268 0.3350 4.0179 0.0108 1.2415 6.6400e0031.2482 0.3297 6.1200e0030.3359 0.0000 995.8912 995.8912 0.0284 0.0286 1,005.128 9 Total 0.4760 1.6644 4.4892 0.0162 1.4236 0.0217 1.4452 0.3823 0.0205 0.4028 0.0000 1,519.942 2 1,519.942
2 0.0425 0.1062 1,552.660
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2863

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0267 0.2445 0.2762 4.6000e0040.0119 0.0119 0.0112 0.0112 0.0000 39.4068 39.4068 9.3700e0030.0000 39.6412 Total 0.0267 0.2445 0.2762 4.6000e0040.0119 0.0119 0.0112 0.0112 0.0000 39.4068 39.4068 9.3700e0030.0000 39.6412 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.2600e0030.1392 0.0564 6.8000e0040.0238 1.0000e0030.0248 6.8700e0039.5000e0047.8200e0030.0000 65.7744 65.7744 1.7100e0039.7200e00368.7139 Worker 0.0516 0.0385 0.4818 1.3700e0030.1624 8.2000e0040.1632 0.0431 7.5000e0040.0439 0.0000 126.8010 126.8010 3.3300e0033.4400e003127.9095 Total 0.0559 0.1778 0.5382 2.0500e0030.1862 1.8200e0030.1880 0.0500 1.7000e0030.0517 0.0000 192.5754 192.5754 5.0400e0030.0132 196.6233 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2864

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.5700e0030.0380 0.2968 4.6000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0040.0000 39.4068 39.4068 9.3700e0030.0000 39.6411 Total 5.5700e0030.0380 0.2968 4.6000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0040.0000 39.4068 39.4068 9.3700e0030.0000 39.6411 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.2600e0030.1392 0.0564 6.8000e0040.0238 1.0000e0030.0248 6.8700e0039.5000e0047.8200e0030.0000 65.7744 65.7744 1.7100e0039.7200e00368.7139 Worker 0.0516 0.0385 0.4818 1.3700e0030.1624 8.2000e0040.1632 0.0431 7.5000e0040.0439 0.0000 126.8010 126.8010 3.3300e0033.4400e003127.9095 Total 0.0559 0.1778 0.5382 2.0500e0030.1862 1.8200e0030.1880 0.0500 1.7000e0030.0517 0.0000 192.5754 192.5754 5.0400e0030.0132 196.6233 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2865

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Paving 9.5100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0198 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e0043.9000e0044.8800e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.4000e0040.0000 1.2845 1.2845 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.2958 Total 5.2000e0043.9000e0044.8800e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.4000e0040.0000 1.2845 1.2845 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.2958 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2866

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.8000e0030.0122 0.1730 2.3000e0043.7000e0043.7000e0043.7000e0043.7000e0040.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Paving 9.5100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0123 0.0122 0.1730 2.3000e0043.7000e0043.7000e0043.7000e0043.7000e0040.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e0043.9000e0044.8800e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.4000e0040.0000 1.2845 1.2845 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.2958 Total 5.2000e0043.9000e0044.8800e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.4000e0040.0000 1.2845 1.2845 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.2958 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2867

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 2.6081 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.1900e0030.0489 0.0679 1.1000e0042.6600e0032.6600e0032.6600e0032.6600e0030.0000 9.5747 9.5747 5.7000e0040.0000 9.5890 Total 2.6153 0.0489 0.0679 1.1000e0042.6600e0032.6600e0032.6600e0032.6600e0030.0000 9.5747 9.5747 5.7000e0040.0000 9.5890 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0227 0.0170 0.2123 6.0000e0040.0715 3.6000e0040.0719 0.0190 3.3000e0040.0193 0.0000 55.8774 55.8774 1.4700e0031.5200e00356.3659 Total 0.0227 0.0170 0.2123 6.0000e0040.0715 3.6000e0040.0719 0.0190 3.3000e0040.0193 0.0000 55.8774 55.8774 1.4700e0031.5200e00356.3659 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2868

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 2.6081 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1100e0034.8300e0030.0687 1.1000e0041.5000e0041.5000e0041.5000e0041.5000e0040.0000 9.5747 9.5747 5.7000e0040.0000 9.5890 Total 2.6092 4.8300e0030.0687 1.1000e0041.5000e0041.5000e0041.5000e0041.5000e0040.0000 9.5747 9.5747 5.7000e0040.0000 9.5890 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0227 0.0170 0.2123 6.0000e0040.0715 3.6000e0040.0719 0.0190 3.3000e0040.0193 0.0000 55.8774 55.8774 1.4700e0031.5200e00356.3659 Total 0.0227 0.0170 0.2123 6.0000e0040.0715 3.6000e0040.0719 0.0190 3.3000e0040.0193 0.0000 55.8774 55.8774 1.4700e0031.5200e00356.3659 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2869

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 2.4002 2.4859 20.0954 0.0365 3.8326 0.0279 3.8605 1.0209 0.0260 1.0469 0.0000 3,401.239 8 3,401.239
8 0.2559 0.1743 3,459.566
8 Unmitigated 2.4002 2.4859 20.0954 0.0365 3.8326 0.0279 3.8605 1.0209 0.0260 1.0469 0.0000 3,401.239 8 3,401.239
8 0.2559 0.1743 3,459.566
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 3,572.47 3,572.47 3572.47 5,682,657 5,682,657 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Regional Shopping Center 2,119.62 2,590.26 1502.32 4,539,098 4,539,098 Total 5,692.09 6,162.73 5,074.79 10,221,754 10,221,754
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 4.37 4.37 4.37 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2870
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.550545 0.057163 0.176442 0.142301 0.027646 0.003370 0.005334 0.008094 0.000262 0.000119 0.025903 0.000447 0.002375 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Parking Lot 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Regional Shopping Center 0.550545 0.057163 0.176442 0.142301 0.027646 0.003370 0.005334 0.008094 0.000262 0.000119 0.025903 0.000447 0.002375

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2871
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,390.932
4 1,390.932
4 0.0863 0.0105 1,396.206
1 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,390.932
4 1,390.932
4 0.0863 0.0105 1,396.206
1 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0544 0.4656 0.2013 2.9700e0030.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0000 538.6927 538.6927 0.0103 9.8800e003541.8939 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0544 0.4656 0.2013 2.9700e0030.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0000 538.6927 538.6927 0.0103 9.8800e003541.8939 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2872

9.93808e
+006

0.0536 0.4579 0.1949 2.9200e0030.0370 0.0370 0.0370 0.0370 0.0000 530.3338 530.3338 0.0102 9.7200e003533.4853 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center
156640 8.4000e0047.6800e0036.4500e0035.0000e0055.8000e0045.8000e0045.8000e0045.8000e0040.0000 8.3589 8.3589 1.6000e0041.5000e0048.4086 Total 0.0544 0.4656 0.2013 2.9700e0030.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0000 538.6927 538.6927 0.0103 9.8700e003541.8939 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2873

9.93808e
+006

0.0536 0.4579 0.1949 2.9200e0030.0370 0.0370 0.0370 0.0370 0.0000 530.3338 530.3338 0.0102 9.7200e003533.4853 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center
156640 8.4000e0047.6800e0036.4500e0035.0000e0055.8000e0045.8000e0045.8000e0045.8000e0040.0000 8.3589 8.3589 1.6000e0041.5000e0048.4086 Total 0.0544 0.4656 0.2013 2.9700e0030.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0376 0.0000 538.6927 538.6927 0.0103 9.8700e003541.8939 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2874

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

2.73637e
+006
660.2910 0.0410 4.9600e003662.7945
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

2.73637e
+006
660.2910 0.0410 4.9600e003662.7945
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

1.99974e
+006
482.5424 0.0299 3.6300e003484.3719
Parking Lot 163800 39.5253 2.4500e0033.0000e00439.6751 Regional
Shopping Center
864368 208.5738 0.0129 1.5700e003209.3646
Total 1,390.932
4 0.0863 0.0105 1,396.206
1 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2876
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 3.3006 0.2042 7.2070 1.1600e0030.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0000 152.7384 152.7384 0.0140 2.5900e003153.8599 Unmitigated 3.3006 0.2042 7.2070 1.1600e0030.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0000 152.7384 152.7384 0.0140 2.5900e003153.8599

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.2608 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

2.8082 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0143 0.1218 0.0518 7.8000e0049.8500e0039.8500e0039.8500e0039.8500e0030.0000 141.0446 141.0446 2.7000e0032.5900e003141.8827 Landscaping 0.2173 0.0824 7.1552 3.8000e0040.0396 0.0396 0.0396 0.0396 0.0000 11.6939 11.6939 0.0113 0.0000 11.9772 Total 3.3006 0.2042 7.2070 1.1600e0030.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0000 152.7384 152.7384 0.0140 2.5900e003153.8599 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2877

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.2608 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

2.8082 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0143 0.1218 0.0518 7.8000e0049.8500e0039.8500e0039.8500e0039.8500e0030.0000 141.0446 141.0446 2.7000e0032.5900e003141.8827 Landscaping 0.2173 0.0824 7.1552 3.8000e0040.0396 0.0396 0.0396 0.0396 0.0000 11.6939 11.6939 0.0113 0.0000 11.9772 Total 3.3006 0.2042 7.2070 1.1600e0030.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0494 0.0000 152.7384 152.7384 0.0140 2.5900e003153.8599 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2878
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 258.7412 1.6539 0.0405 312.1654
Unmitigated 258.7412 1.6539 0.0405 312.1654

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

45.0214 /

28.3831
231.8315 1.4805 0.0363 279.6546
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center

5.27396 /

3.23243

26.9097 0.1734 4.2500e00332.5109
Total 258.7412 1.6539 0.0405 312.1654
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 37 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2879

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

45.0214 /

28.3831
231.8315 1.4805 0.0363 279.6546
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center

5.27396 /

3.23243

26.9097 0.1734 4.2500e00332.5109
Total 258.7412 1.6539 0.0405 312.1654
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 38 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2880
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 79.6983 4.7100 0.0000 197.4492
Unmitigated 79.6983 4.7100 0.0000 197.4492
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
317.86 64.5227 3.8132 0.0000 159.8523
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center

74.76 15.1756 0.8969 0.0000 37.5969
Total 79.6983 4.7100 0.0000 197.4492
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 39 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2881

74.76 15.1756 0.8969 0.0000 37.5969
Total 79.6983 4.7100 0.0000 197.4492
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 41 of 41 Date: 6/2/2021 10:01 AM Toyota Arena Mixed Use Development - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2883
Appendix B
EMFAC2017 Vehicle Consumption Data
2884
EMFAC2017 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Air District
Region: South Coast AQMD
Calendar Year: 2023
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011Categories
Units: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass Fuel Population VMT Fuel_Consumption Fuel Split
(Gas:Diesel)
MPG,
by Fuel Type
MPG,
Average
SOUTH COAST AQMD 2023 LDA GAS 6635002.295 252710542.7 7971.24403 99.38% 31.70 32.59 South Coast AQMD 2023 LDA DSL 62492.97958 2469815.67 49.3916685 0.62% 50.00 South Coast AQMD 2023 LDA ELEC 150700.3971 6237105.777 0 South Coast AQMD 2023 LDT1 GAS 758467.6481 27812996.47 1023.913006 99.96% 27.16 27.46 South Coast AQMD 2023 LDT1 DSL 360.7799144 8408.618214 0.366459477 0.04% 22.95 South Coast AQMD 2023 LDT1 ELEC 7122.93373 303507.5334 0 South Coast AQMD 2023 LDT2 GAS 2285150.139 85272415.53 3338.798312 99.47% 25.54 25.6 South Coast AQMD 2023 LDT2 DSL 15594.68309 650362.8069 17.73812611 0.53% 36.66 South Coast AQMD 2023 LDT2 ELEC 28809.63735 917592.8423 0 South Coast AQMD 2023 MDV GAS 1589862.703 55684188.36 2693.883526 98.15% 20.67 20.81 South Coast AQMD 2023 MDV DSL 36128.1019 1425691.372 50.65281491 1.85% 28.15 South Coast AQMD 2023 MDV ELEC 16376.67653 537591.7438 0 South Coast AQMD 2023 LHD1 GAS 174910.3847 6216642.74 583.3851736 71.88% 10.66 13.81 South Coast AQMD 2023 LHD1 DSL 125545.0822 4994753.051 228.1779285 28.12% 21.89 South Coast AQMD 2023 LHD2 GAS 30102.75324 1034569.096 111.5753864 53.28% 9.27 14.18 South Coast AQMD 2023 LHD2 DSL 50003.13116 1935029.912 97.84811618 46.72% 19.78 South Coast AQMD 2023 MHDT GAS 25624.3151 1363694.415 265.2060557 26.79% 5.14 9.58 South Coast AQMD 2023 MHDT DSL 122124.488 8120623.353 724.7695868 73.21% 11.20 South Coast AQMD 2023 HHDT GAS 75.10442936 8265.097091 1.936286145 0.10% 4.27 6.94 South Coast AQMD 2023 HHDT DSL 115130.71 13671497.32 1970.514243 99.90% 6.94 South Coast AQMD 2023 OBUS GAS 5955.291639 245774.0168 48.07750689 100.00% 5.11 5.11 South Coast AQMD 2023 OBUS DSL 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00
South Coast AQMD 2023 UBUS GAS 957.7686184 89782.63172 17.62416327 98.66% 5.09 5.18 South Coast AQMD 2023 UBUS DSL 13.00046095 1416.621572 0.239500509 1.34% 5.91 South Coast AQMD 2023 UBUS ELEC 16.11693886 1320.163255 0 South Coast AQMD 2023 SBUS GAS 2783.643068 112189.6089 12.19474692 30.76% 9.20 8.15 South Coast AQMD 2023 SBUS DSL 6671.825716 210853.9115 27.44411242 69.24% 7.68 South Coast AQMD 2023 MCY GAS 305044.5141 2104623.657 57.849018 100.00% 36.38 36.38 South Coast AQMD 2023 MH GAS 34679.50542 330042.9197 63.26295123 84.47% 5.22 6.07 South Coast AQMD 2023 MH DSL 13122.69387 124302.0239 11.63031832 15.53% 10.69 2885
Addendum to the Ontario Center Specific Plan EIR
City of Ontario for the Adept-Piemonte Overlay Project
March 2022 Appendix E

APPENDIX E

Ontario City CouncilApril 19, 2022

Ontario City Council
April 19, 2022