Ontario City Council
April 16, 2024

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
• Application of Best Available Retrofit Control Technology to existing sources; • Developing control programs for area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and solvents) and indirect sources (e.g. motor vehicle use generated by residential and commercial development);
• A District permitting system designed to allow no net increase in emissions from any new or modified permitted sources of emissions;
• Implementing reasonably available transportation control measures and assuring a substantial reduction in growth rate of vehicle trips and miles traveled; • Significant use of low emissions vehicles by fleet operators; • Sufficient control strategies to achieve a 5% or more annual reduction in emissions or 15% or more in a period of three years for ROGs, NOX, CO and PM10. However, air basins may use alternative emission reduction strategy that achieves a reduction of less than 5% per year under certain circumstances.

AQMP
Currently, the NAAQS and CAAQS are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMP to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards (9). AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy.

APPLICABLE REGULATORY REQUIRMENTS
SCAQMD Rules that are currently applicable during construction activity for this Project include but are not limited to Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) and Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) (10) (11).

SCAQMD Rule 403
This rule is intended to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (human-made) fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent and reduce fugitive dust emissions. Rule 403 applies to any activity or human-made condition capable of generating fugitive dust and requires best available control measures to be applied to earth moving and grading activities. This rule is intended to reduce PM10 emissions from any transportation, handling, construction, or storage activity that has the potential to generate fugitive dust. PM10 suppression techniques are summarized below. • Portions of a construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three months will be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized. • All onsite roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically stabilized.
• All material transported offsite will be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
• The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations will be minimized at all times.
1858
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
• Where vehicles leave a construction site and enter adjacent public streets, the streets will be swept daily or washed down at the end of the workday to remove soil tracked onto the paved surface.

SCAQMD Rule 1113
This rule serves to limit the volatile organic compound (VOC) content of architectural coatings used on projects in the SCAQMD. Any person who supplies, sells, offers for sale, or manufactures any architectural coating for use on projects in the SCAQMD must comply with the current VOC standards set in this rule.

METHODOLOGY
In May 2022, the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) in conjunction with other California air districts, including SCAQMD, released the latest version of the CalEEMod Version 2022.1. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and operationalsource criteria pollutant (VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5) and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources; and quantify applicable air quality and GHG reductions achieved from mitigation measures (12). Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used for this Project to determine construction and operational air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Standards of Significance
The criteria used to determine the significance of potential Project-related air quality impacts are taken from the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) (14 CCR §§15000, et seq.). Based on these thresholds, a project would result in a significant impact related to air quality if it would (13):
• Threshold 1: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. • Threshold 2: Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.
• Threshold 3: Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. • Threshold 4: Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

AIR QUALITY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS
The SCAQMD has developed regional significance thresholds for criteria pollutants, as summarized at Table 1 (14). The SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Significance Thresholds (April 2019) indicate that any projects in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) with daily emissions that exceed any of the indicated thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact.
1859
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
TABLE 1: MAXIMUM DAILY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS
Pollutant Construction Operations
NOX 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
PM10 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day
PM2.5 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
SOX 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day
CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day
lbs/day – Pounds Per Day

AIR QUALITY LOCALIZED EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS
For this Project, the appropriate SRA for the LST analysis is the SCAQMD Southwest San Bernardino Valley monitoring station (SRA 33). LSTs apply to CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. The SCAQMD produced look-up tables for projects less than or equal to 5 acres in size. The SCAQMD’s screening look-up tables are utilized in determining localized impacts. It should be noted that since the look-up tables identify thresholds at only 1 acre, 2 acres, and 5 acres, linear regression has been utilized to determine localized significance thresholds. Consistent with SCAQMD guidance, the thresholds presented in Table 2 were calculated by interpolating the threshold values for the Project’s disturbed acreage.

The acres disturbed is based on the equipment list and days in the demolition, site preparation, and grading phase according to the anticipated maximum number of acres a given piece of equipment can pass over in an 8-hour workday. The equipment-specific grading rates are summarized in the CalEEMod user’s guide, Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod (15). It should be noted that the disturbed area per day is representative of a piece of equipment making multiple passes over the same land area. In other words, one Rubber Tired Dozer can make multiple passes over the same land area totaling 0.5 acres in a given 8-hour day. Appendix A of the CalEEMod User Manual only identifies equipment-specific grading rates for Crawler Tractors, Graders, Rubber Tired Dozers, and Scrapers; therefore, Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes equipment that was included in the demolition, site preparation and grading phase was replaced with Crawler Tractors. For analytical purposes, emissions associated with peak site demolition, preparation, and grading activities are considered for purposes of localized significance thresholds (LSTs) since this phase represents the maximum localized emissions that would occur.

The Project’s construction activities could disturb a maximum of approximately 1 acre per day for demolition, 3.5 acres per day for site preparation and 4 acres per day for grading activities. Any other construction phases of development would result in lesser emissions and consequently lesser impacts than what is disclosed herein. As such, Table 2 presents thresholds for localized construction and operational emissions.
1860
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
TABLE 2: MAXIMUM DAILY LOCALIZED EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS
Source Activity
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX PM10 PM2.5
Construction
Demolition 118 lbs/day 863 lbs/day 92 lbs/day 28 lbs/day Site Preparation 220 lbs/day 1,713 lbs/day 95 lbs/day 36 lbs/day Grading 237 lbs/day 1,873 lbs/day 106 lbs/day 38 lbs/day Operations N/A 270 lbs/day 2,193 lbs/day 31 lbs/day 10 lbs/day 1 Source of localized significance threshold (LSTs) is provided on page 20.

CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
Construction activities associated with the Project would result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction activities:
• Demolition
• Site Preparation
• Grading (Import/Export)
• Building Construction
• Paving
• Architectural Coating

DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES
The Project site has existing uses that are currently active by a telecommunication company with vehicle maintenance operations on-site which will be demolished, resulting in approximately 25,000 square feet of demolished material.

GRADING ACTIVITIES
Dust is typically a major concern during grading activities. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called “fugitive emissions”. Fugitive dust emissions rates vary as a function of many parameters (soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, etc.). CalEEMod was utilized to calculate fugitive dust emissions resulting from this phase of activity. Per client provided data, this analysis assumes that earthwork activities are expected to balance on site and no import or export of soils would be required. The CalEEMod default trip length of 20-miles will be used to analyze the emissions associated with export activities. 1861
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

ON-ROAD TRIPS
Construction generates on-road vehicle emissions from vehicle usage for workers, vendors, and haul trucks commuting to and from the site. Worker and hauling trips are based on CalEEMod defaults. It should be noted that for vendor trips, specifically, CalEEMod only assigns vendor trips to the Building Construction phase. Vendor trips would likely occur during all phases of construction. As such, the CalEEMod defaults for vendor trips have been adjusted based on a ratio of the total vendor trips to the number of days of each subphase of activity.

CONSTRUCTION DURATION
For purposes of analysis, construction of Project is expected to commence in August 2024 and would last through August 2025. The construction schedule utilized in the analysis represents a “worst-case” analysis scenario should construction occur any time after the respective dates since emission factors for construction decrease as time passes and the analysis year increases due to emission regulations becoming more stringent2. The duration of construction activity and associated equipment represents a reasonable approximation of the expected construction fleet as required per CEQA Guidelines (16).

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
CalEEMod default parameters for equipment has been used. Consistent with industry standards and typical construction practices, each piece of equipment will operate up to a total of eight (8) hours per day, or more than two-thirds of the period during which construction activities are allowed pursuant to the code.

REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY
The estimated maximum daily construction emissions are summarized on Table 3, and as shown, the Project construction-source emissions would not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. Thus, the Project would result in a less than significant impact associated with construction activities.

Detailed construction model outputs are presented in Attachment A. 2 As shown in the CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2022.1, Section 4.3 “Off-Road Equipment” as the analysis year increases, emission factors for the same equipment pieces decrease due to the natural turnover of older equipment being replaced by newer less polluting equipment and new regulatory requirements. 1862
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
TABLE 3: REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Source
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
2024 3.74 36.04 34.41 0.06 7.49 4.21
2025 13.45 20.42 29.39 0.04 1.53 0.95
Winter
2024 3.62 34.44 31.47 0.06 4.39 2.38
2025 1.33 11.73 15.82 0.03 0.88 0.53
Maximum Daily Emissions 13.45 36.04 34.41 0.06 7.49 4.21 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
1 PM10 and PM2.5 source emissions reflect 3x daily watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 for fugitive dust.

REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Operational activities associated with the Project would result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5. Operational related emissions are expected from the following primary sources:
area source emissions, energy source emissions, and mobile source emissions.

The Project related operational air quality impacts derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project. Trip characteristics available from the First Grove Addendum Trip Generation Assessment were utilized in this analysis (17).

To determine emissions from trucks for the proposed industrial uses, the analysis incorporated the SCAQMD recommended truck trip length 15.3 miles for 2-axle (LHDT1, LHDT2) trucks, 14.2 miles 3-axle (MHDT) trucks and 39.9 miles for 4+-axle (HHDT) trucks and weighting the average trip lengths using the traffic trip percentages taken from the First Grove Addendum Trip Generation Assessment (17). The trip length function for trucks in CalEEMod has been revised to 28.72 miles, with an assumption of 100% primary trips for the proposed industrial land uses. This trip length assumption is higher than the CalEEMod defaults for trucks.

It is common for warehouse buildings to require the operation of exterior yard trucks or cargo handling equipment (CHE) to move empty containers and empty chassis in the building’s truck court areas. The cargo handling equipment is assumed to have a horsepower (hp) range of approximately 175 hp to 200 hp. Based on the latest available information from SCAQMD (18); for example, warehouse projects typically have 3.6-yard trucks/CHE per million square feet of building space. For this Project, on-site modeled operational equipment conservatively includes 1863
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
up to one (1) 200 horsepower (hp), compressed natural gas or gasoline-powered tractors/loaders/backhoes operating at 4 hours a day3 for 365 days of the year.

The estimated operation-source emissions from the Project are summarized on Table 4. Detailed operation model outputs are presented in Attachment B. As shown on Table 4, operationalsource emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds for emissions of any criteria pollutant.

TABLE 4: TOTAL PROJECT REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Source
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
Mobile Source 1.09 2.02 11.03 0.03 1.01 0.21
Area Source 1.86 0.02 2.69 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy Source 0.03 0.46 0.38 0.00 0.03 0.03
On-site Equipment Source 0.12 0.38 16.44 0.00 0.03 0.03 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 3.09 2.88 30.55 0.04 1.08 0.28 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Winter
Mobile Source 1.03 2.15 9.30 0.03 1.01 0.21
Area Source 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy Source 0.03 0.46 0.38 0.00 0.03 0.03
On-site Equipment Source 0.12 0.38 16.44 0.00 0.03 0.03 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 2.59 2.98 26.13 0.03 1.08 0.27 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
THE ONTARIO PLAN (TOP) 2050
The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (August 2022) designates the Project site as Business Park uses. Per the adopted TOP 2050, the Project site could be developed with up to 109,817 square feet of industrial use (assuming a 4.2-acre site and a floor-to-area-ratio of 0.60). The estimated operation-source emissions based on the TOP 2050 adopted Industrial land use designation are summarized on Table 5. Detailed operation model outputs for the TOP 2050 adopted Industrial land use designation are presented in Attachment D. 3 Based on Table II-3, Port and Rail Cargo Handling Equipment Demographics by Type, from CARB’s Technology Assessment: Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment document, a single piece of equipment could operate up to 2 hours per day (Total Average Annual Activity divided by Total Number Pieces of Equipment). As such, the analysis conservatively assumes that the tractor/loader/backhoes would operate up to 4 hours per day. 1864
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
The Project related operational air quality impacts derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project. Trip characteristics available from the First Grove Addendum Trip Generation Assessment were utilized in this analysis (17).

To determine emissions from trucks for the TOP 2050 industrial uses, the analysis incorporated the SCAQMD recommended truck trip length 15.3 miles for 2-axle (LHDT1, LHDT2) trucks, 14.2 miles 3-axle (MHDT) trucks and 39.9 miles for 4+-axle (HHDT) trucks and weighting the average trip lengths using the traffic trip percentages taken from the First Grove Addendum Trip Generation Assessment (17). The trip length function for trucks in CalEEMod has been revised to 29.84 miles, with an assumption of 100% primary trips for the TOP 2050 industrial land uses. This trip length assumption is higher than the CalEEMod defaults for trucks.

It is common for warehouse buildings to require the operation of exterior yard trucks or cargo handling equipment (CHE) to move empty containers and empty chassis in the building’s truck court areas. The cargo handling equipment is assumed to have a horsepower (hp) range of approximately 175 hp to 200 hp. Based on the latest available information from SCAQMD (18); for example, warehouse projects typically have 3.6-yard trucks/CHE per million square feet of building space. For the TOP 2050 land use, on-site modeled operational equipment conservatively includes up to one (1) 200 horsepower (hp), compressed natural gas or gasolinepowered tractors/loaders/backhoes operating at 4 hours a day4 for 365 days of the year.

TABLE 5: TOP 2050 REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Source
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
Mobile Source 2.13 4.10 22.43 0.06 1.80 0.38
Area Source 3.28 0.04 4.77 0.00 0.01 0.01
Energy Source 0.04 0.81 0.68 0.00 0.06 0.06
On-site Equipment Source 0.12 0.38 16.44 0.00 0.03 0.03 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 5.57 5.33 44.33 0.07 1.89 0.47 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
4 Based on Table II-3, Port and Rail Cargo Handling Equipment Demographics by Type, from CARB’s Technology Assessment: Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment document, a single piece of equipment could operate up to 2 hours per day (Total Average Annual Activity divided by Total Number Pieces of Equipment). As such, the analysis conservatively assumes that the tractor/loader/backhoes would operate up to 4 hours per day. 1865
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
Source
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Winter
Mobile Source 2.01 4.36 18.84 0.06 1.80 0.38
Area Source 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy Source 0.04 0.81 0.68 0.00 0.06 0.06
On-site Equipment Source 0.12 0.38 16.44 0.00 0.03 0.03 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 4.67 5.54 35.97 0.06 1.89 0.47 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
PROJECT NET NEW OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS – COMPARISON TO TOP 2050 As shown in Table 6, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate less emissions per day for pollutants of VOC, NOX, CO, SOX, and PM2.5 as compared to emissions generated by the TOP 2050 adopted Industrial land use designation, and operational-source emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds.

TABLE 6: PROJECT NET NEW REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
Proposed Project 3.09 2.88 30.55 0.04 1.08 0.28
TOP 2050 5.57 5.33 44.33 0.07 1.89 0.47
Net Emissions (Proposed – TOP 2050) -2.48 -2.45 -13.78 -0.03 -0.81 -0.20 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Winter
Proposed Project 2.59 2.98 26.13 0.03 1.08 0.27
TOP 2050 4.67 5.54 35.97 0.06 1.89 0.47
Net Emissions (Proposed – TOP 2050) -2.08 -2.56 -9.84 -0.03 -0.81 -0.19 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
1866
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

EXISTING BUILDING OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
The site is occupied by existing uses that are currently active by a telecommunication company with vehicle maintenance operations on-site, which are approximately 25,000 square feet combined. The estimated operation-source emissions from the existing building are summarized on Table 7. Detailed operation model outputs for the existing use are presented in Attachment E.

The Project related operational air quality impacts derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project. Trip characteristics available from the First Grove Addendum Trip Generation Assessment were utilized in this analysis (17).

To determine emissions from trucks for the existing industrial uses, the analysis incorporated the SCAQMD recommended truck trip length 15.3 miles for 2-axle (LHDT1, LHDT2) trucks, 14.2 miles 3-axle (MHDT) trucks and 39.9 miles for 4+-axle (HHDT) trucks and weighting the average trip lengths using the traffic trip percentages taken from the First Grove Addendum Trip Generation Assessment (17). The trip length function for trucks in CalEEMod has been revised to 15.28 miles, with an assumption of 100% primary trips for the existing industrial land uses. This trip length assumption is higher than the CalEEMod defaults for trucks.

TABLE 7: EXISTING BUILDING REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
Mobile Source 1.40 3.85 13.93 0.04 1.46 0.34
Area Source 0.77 0.01 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy Source 0.01 0.13 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.01
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 2.18 3.98 15.12 0.04 1.47 0.35 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Winter
Mobile Source 1.33 4.07 12.05 0.04 1.46 0.34
Area Source 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy Source 0.01 0.13 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.01
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 1.93 4.20 12.16 0.04 1.47 0.35 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
1867
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
PROJECT NET NEW OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS – COMPARISON TO EXISTING BUILDING As shown in Table 8, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate less emissions per day for pollutants of VOC, NOX, CO, and PM2.5 as compared to emissions generated by the existing buildings and operational-source emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds.

TABLE 8: PROJECT NET NEW REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
Proposed Project 3.09 2.88 30.55 0.04 1.08 0.28
Existing Building 2.18 3.98 15.12 0.04 1.47 0.35
Net Emissions (Proposed – Existing) 0.91 -1.11 15.43 -0.01 -0.39 -0.08 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Winter
Proposed Project 2.59 2.98 26.13 0.03 1.08 0.27
Existing Building 1.93 4.20 12.16 0.04 1.47 0.35
Net Emissions (Proposed – Existing) 0.66 -1.22 13.97 -0.01 -0.39 -0.08 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO

LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
The analysis makes use of methodology included in the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology) (19). The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the federal and/or state ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS). Collectively, these are referred to as Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). The SCAQMD established LSTs in response to the SCAQMD Governing Board’s Environmental Justice Initiative I-45. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard at the sensitive receptor. 5 The purpose of SCAQMD’s Environmental Justice program is to ensure that everyone has the right to equal protection from air pollution and fair access to the decision-making process that works to improve the quality of air within their communities. Further, the SCAQMD defines Environmental Justice as “…equitable environmental policymaking and enforcement to protect the health of all residents, regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location, from the health effects of air pollution.” 1868
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
The SCAQMD states that lead agencies can use the LSTs as another indicator of significance in its air quality impact analyses.

The SCAQMD recommends that the nearest sensitive receptor be considered when determining the Project’s potential to cause an individual or cumulatively significant impact. The nearest land use where an individual could remain for 24 hours to the Project site has been used to determine localized construction and operational air quality impacts for emissions of PM10 and PM2.5 (since PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds are based on a 24-hour averaging time). The nearest receptor used for evaluation of localized impacts of PM10 and PM2.5 is location R1, represented by the existing residence at 2125 S Cucamonga Ave, approximately 596 feet (182 meters) southwest of the Project site. Receptors in the Project study area shown on Exhibit 2.

As previously stated, and consistent with LST Methodology, the nearest industrial/commercial use to the Project site is used to determine construction and operational LST air impacts for emissions of NOX and CO as the averaging periods for these pollutants are shorter (8 hours or less) and it is reasonable to assume that an individual could be present at these sites for periods of one to 8 hours. The nearest receptor used for evaluation of localized impacts of NOX and CO is location R6, represented by Tech Industrial Machine Corp at 2124 S Grove Ave Unit J, adjacent south of the Project site.

It should be noted that the LST Methodology explicitly states that “It is possible that a project may have receptors closer than 25 meters. Projects with boundaries located closer than 25 meters to the nearest receptor should use the LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters (19).” As such, for evaluation of localized NOx and CO, a 25-meter distance will be used. 1869
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
EXHIBIT 2: SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS

1870
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
Table 9 identifies the localized impacts at the nearest receptor location in the vicinity of the Project. Outputs from the model runs for construction LSTs are provided in Attachment A. For analytical purposes, emissions associated with peak demolition, site preparation and grading activities are considered for purposes of LSTs since these phases represent the maximum localized emissions that would occur. Any other construction phases of development that overlap would result in less emissions and consequently lesser impacts than what is disclosed herein. As shown in Table 9, emissions resulting from the Project construction will not exceed the numerical thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD for any criteria pollutant. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur for localized Project-related construction-source emissions and no mitigation is required.

TABLE 9: PROJECT LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS
On-Site Emissions Emissions (lbs/day)
NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Demolition
Maximum Daily Emissions 24.89 21.74 1.90 1.10
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 118 863 92 28
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO
Site Preparation
Maximum Daily Emissions 35.95 32.93 7.26 4.16
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 220 1,713 95 36
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO
Grading
Maximum Daily Emissions 34.29 30.17 4.12 2.31
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 237 1,873 106 38
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO

LOCALIZED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Table 10 identifies the localized operational impacts at the nearest receptor location in the vicinity of the Project. In an effort to establish a maximum potential impact scenario for analytical purposes, the emissions shown on Table 10 represent all on-site Project-related stationary (area) sources and on-site mobile source emissions. It should be noted that the longest on-site distance is roughly 0.13 miles for both trucks and passenger vehicles. As such, a separate CalEEMod run for operational LSTs has been prepared which accounts for the 0.13-mile on-site travel distance.

Outputs from the model runs for operational LSTs are provided in Attachment C. As shown in Table 10, emissions resulting from the Project operation will not exceed the numerical localized thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD for any criteria pollutant. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur for localized Project-related operational-source emissions and no mitigation is required.
1871
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
TABLE 10: PROJECT LOCALIZED OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
On-Site Emissions Emissions (lbs/day)
NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Daily Emissions 1.19 21.47 0.08 0.07
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 2,193 31 10
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO
AIR QUALITY IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 1
Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The Project site is located within the SCAB, which is characterized by relatively poor air quality.

The SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an approximately 10,743 square-mile area consisting of the four-county Basin and the Los Angeles County and Riverside County portions of what use to be referred to as the Southeast Desert Air Basin. In these areas, the SCAQMD is principally responsible for air pollution control, and works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, local governments, as well as state and federal agencies to reduce emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards.

Currently, these state and federal air quality standards are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB.

In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMPs to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards. AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy.

In December 2022, the SCAQMD released the Final 2022 AQMP (2022 AQMP). The 2022 AQMP continues to evaluate current integrated strategies and control measures to meet the CAAQS, as well as explore new and innovative methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive programs, recognizing existing co-benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair-share reductions at the federal, state, and local levels (20). Similar to the 2016 AQMP, the 2022 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, a planning document that supports the integration of land use and transportation to help the region meet the federal CAA requirements (21). The Project’s consistency with the AQMP will be determined using the 2022 AQMP as discussed below.

Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the 1993 CEQA Handbook (22). These indicators are discussed below.

The proposed Project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP.

The violations that under this criterion refer to are the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded. 1872
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded. As evaluated, the Project’s regional and localized construction and operational-source emissions would not exceed applicable regional significance thresholds. As such, a less than significant impact is expected.

On the basis of the preceding discussion, the Project is determined to be consistent with the first criterion.

The Project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of Project buildout phase.

The 2022 AQMP demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the timeframes required under federal law. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district are provided to the SCAG, which develops regional growth forecasts, which are then used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Development consistent with the growth projections in City of Ontario General Plan is considered to be consistent with the AQMP.

Peak day emissions generated by construction activities are largely independent of land use assignments, but rather are a function of development scope and maximum area of disturbance.

Irrespective of the site’s land use designation, development of the site to its maximum potential would likely occur, with disturbance of the entire site occurring during construction activities. As such, when considering that no emissions thresholds will be exceeded, a less than significant impact would result.

The TOP 2050 adopted by the City in August 2022, designates the Project site as “Business Park (BP)” land uses. The BP designation allows for a maximum FAR of 0.60 for employee-intensive office uses including corporate offices, technology centers, research and development, “clean” industry, light manufacturing, and supporting retail within a business park setting (23).

The proposed Project includes the development of 61,867 square foot industrial warehouse building on 4.20 acres. As previously stated, the Project is consistent with the current land use and zoning designation. As such, the proposed Project would not conflict with the goals and objectives of the AQMP. Furthermore, the Project, as evaluated herein would not exceed the regional or localized air quality significance thresholds.

On the basis of the preceding discussion, the Project is determined to be consistent with the AQMP and a less than significant impact is expected.

AIR QUALITY IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 2
Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
The CAAQS designate the Project site as nonattainment for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 while the NAAQS designates the Project site as nonattainment for O3 and PM2.5.

The SCAQMD has published a report on how to address cumulative impacts from air pollution:

White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution (24). In this report the SCAQMD clearly states (Page D-3):
1873
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
“…the SCAQMD uses the same significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts for all environmental topics analyzed in an Environmental Assessment or EIR. The only case where the significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts differ is the Hazard Index (HI) significance threshold for TAC emissions. The project specific (project increment) significance threshold is HI > 1.0 while the cumulative (facility-wide) is HI > 3.0. It should be noted that the HI is only one of three TAC emission significance thresholds considered (when applicable) in a CEQA analysis. The other two are the maximum individual cancer risk (MICR) and the cancer burden, both of which use the same significance thresholds (MICR of 10 in 1 million and cancer burden of 0.5) for project specific and cumulative impacts.

Projects that exceed the project-specific significance thresholds are considered by the SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable. This is the reason project-specific and cumulative significance thresholds are the same. Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project-specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant.” Therefore, this analysis assumes that individual projects that do not generate operational or construction emissions that exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended daily thresholds for projectspecific impacts would also not cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which SCAB is in nonattainment, and, therefore, would not be considered to have a significant, adverse air quality impact. Alternatively, individual project-related construction and operational emissions that exceed SCAQMD thresholds for project-specific impacts would be considered cumulatively considerable.

Construction Impacts
The Project‐specific evaluation of emissions presented in the preceding analysis demonstrates that proposed Project construction-source air pollutant emissions would not result in exceedances of regional thresholds. Therefore, proposed Project construction-source emissions would be considered less than significant on a project-specific and cumulative basis.

Operational Impacts
The Project‐specific evaluation of emissions presented in the preceding analysis demonstrates that proposed Project operational-source air pollutant emissions would not result in exceedances of regional thresholds. Therefore, the proposed Project operational-source emissions would be considered less than significant on a project-specific and cumulative basis.

AIR QUALITY IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 3
Would the expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The potential impact of Project-generated air pollutant emissions at sensitive receptors has also been considered. Results of the LST analysis indicate that the Project will not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds during construction. Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during Project construction.

Additionally, the Project will not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds during operational activity. Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations as the result of Project operations.
1874
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
CO “HOT SPOT” ANALYSIS
As discussed below, the Project would not result in potentially adverse CO concentrations or “hot spots.” Further, detailed modeling of Project-specific CO “hot spots” is not needed to reach this conclusion. An adverse CO concentration, known as a “hot spot”, would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur.

It has long been recognized that CO hotspots are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when idling at congested intersections. In response, vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly stringent in the last twenty years. Currently, the allowable CO emissions standard in California is a maximum of 3.4 grams/mile for passenger cars (there are requirements for certain vehicles that are more stringent). With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of increasingly sophisticated and efficient emissions control technologies, CO concentration in the SCAB is now designated as attainment. To establish a more accurate record of baseline CO concentrations affecting the SCAB, a CO “hot spot” analysis was conducted in 2003 for four busy intersections in Los Angeles at the peak morning and afternoon time periods6. This “hot spot” analysis did not predict any exceedance of the 1-hour (20.0 ppm) or 8-hour (9.0 ppm) CO standards, as shown on Table 11.

TABLE 11: CO MODEL RESULTS
Intersection Location
CO Concentrations (ppm)
Morning 1-hour Afternoon 1-hour 8-hour
Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue 4.6 3.5 3.7
Sunset Boulevard/Highland Avenue 4 4.5 3.5
La Cienega Boulevard/Century Boulevard 3.7 3.1 5.2
Long Beach Boulevard/Imperial Highway 3 3.1 8.4
Notes: Federal 1-hour standard is 35 ppm and the deferral 8-hour standard is 9.0 ppm.

Based on the SCAQMD's 2003 AQMP and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan), peak carbon monoxide concentrations in the SCAB were a result of unusual meteorological and topographical conditions and not a result of traffic volumes and congestion at a particular intersection. As evidence of this, for example, 8.4 ppm 8-hr CO concentration measured at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection (highest CO generating intersection within the “hot spot” analysis), only 0.7 ppm was attributable to the traffic volumes and congestion at this intersection; the remaining 7.7 ppm were due to the ambient air measurements at the time the 2003 AQMP was prepared (25). In contrast, an adverse CO concentration, known as a “hot spot”, would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur.

Similar considerations are also employed by other Air Districts when evaluating potential CO concentration impacts. More specifically, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District 6 The CO “hot spot” analysis conducted in 2003 is the most current study used for CO “hot spot” analysis in the SCAB. 1875
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
(BAAQMD) concludes that under existing and future vehicle emission rates, a given project would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour (vph)—or 24,000 vph where vertical and/or horizontal air does not mix—in order to generate a significant CO impact (26). Traffic volumes generating the CO concentrations for the “hot spot” analysis is shown on Table 12. The busiest intersection evaluated was at Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue, which had AM/PM traffic volumes of 8,062 vph and 7,719 vph respectively (27). The 2003 AQMP estimated that the 1-hour concentration for this intersection was 4.6 ppm; this indicates that, should the hourly traffic volume increase four times to 32,248 vehicles per hour, CO concentrations (4.6 ppm x 4 = 18.4 ppm) would still not likely exceed the most stringent 1-hour CO standard (20.0 ppm). Although the intersection at Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue is near the Project site, there would be a negligible increase in trips at any study area intersection as the trip generation is significantly low. Since the Project will generate a reduction in approximately -66 net ADT, the Project would not generate sufficient ADT to cause a CO hotspot.

TABLE 12: CO MODEL RESULTS
Intersection Location
Peak Traffic Volumes (vph)
Eastbound
(AM/PM)
Westbound
(AM/PM)
Southbound
(AM/PM)
Northbound
(AM/PM)
Total
(AM/PM)
Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue 4,954/2,069 1,830/3,317 721/1,400 560/933 8,062/7,719 Sunset Boulevard/Highland Avenue 1,417/1,764 1,342/1,540 2,304/1,832 1,551/2,238 6,614/5,374 La Cienega Boulevard/Century Boulevard 2,540/2,243 1,890/2,728 1,384/2,029 821/1,674 6,634/8,674 Long Beach Boulevard/Imperial Highway 1,217/2,020 1,760/1,400 479/944 756/1,150 4,212/5,514 AIR QUALITY IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 4
Would the Project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
The potential for the Project to generate objectionable odors has also been considered. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include:
• Agricultural uses (livestock and farming)
• Wastewater treatment plants
• Food processing plants
• Chemical plants
• Composting operations
• Refineries
• Landfills
• Dairies
• Fiberglass molding facilities
1876
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
The Project does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors.

Potential odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) associated with the proposed Project’s (long-term operational) uses. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction and is thus considered less than significant. It is expected that Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the solid waste regulations. The proposed Project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the proposed Project construction and operations would be less than significant and no mitigation is required (28).

PROJECT GHG ANALYSIS

CLIMATE CHANGE SETTING
Global climate change (GCC) is the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to temperature, precipitation, and storms. The majority of scientists believe that the climate shift taking place since the Industrial Revolution is occurring at a quicker rate and magnitude than in the past. Scientific evidence suggests that GCC is the result of increased concentrations of GHGs in the earth’s atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and fluorinated gases. The majority of scientists believe that this increased rate of climate change is the result of GHGs resulting from human activity and industrialization over the past 200 years.

An individual project like the proposed Project evaluated in this memo cannot generate enough GHG emissions to affect a discernible change in global climate. However, the proposed Project may participate in the potential for GCC by its incremental contribution of GHGs combined with the cumulative increase of all other sources of GHGs, which when taken together constitute potential influences on GCC. Because these changes may have serious environmental consequences, this memo will evaluate the potential for the proposed Project to have a significant effect upon the environment as a result of its potential contribution to the greenhouse effect.

GCC refers to the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to temperature, wind patterns, precipitation and storms. Global temperatures are regulated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases such as water vapor, CO2, N2O, CH4, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). These particular gases are important due to their residence time (duration they stay) in the atmosphere, which ranges from 10 years to more than 100 years. These gases allow solar radiation into the earth’s atmosphere, but prevent radiative heat from escaping, thus warming the earth’s atmosphere. GCC can occur naturally as it has in the past with the previous ice ages.

Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are often referred to as GHGs. GHGs are released into the atmosphere by both natural and anthropogenic activity. Without the natural GHG effect, the earth’s average temperature would be approximately 61 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) cooler than it is 1877
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
currently. The cumulative accumulation of these gases in the earth’s atmosphere is considered to be the cause for the observed increase in the earth’s temperature.

For the purposes of this analysis, emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O were evaluated because these gases are the primary contributors to GCC from development projects. Although there are other substances such as fluorinated gases that also contribute to GCC, these fluorinated gases were not evaluated as their sources are not well-defined and do not contain accepted emissions factors or methodology to accurately calculate these gases.

REGULATORY SETTING
Executive Order S-3-05
Former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced on June 1, 2005, through Executive Order S-3-05, the following reduction targets for GHG emissions:
• By 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels.
• By 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels.
• By 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels.

The 2050 reduction goal represents what some scientists believe is necessary to reach levels that will stabilize the climate. The 2020 goal was established to be a mid-term target. Because this is an executive order, the goals are not legally enforceable for local governments or the private sector.

Assembly Bill (AB) 32
The California State Legislature enacted AB 32, which requires that GHGs emitted in California be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. “GHGs” as defined under AB 32 include CO2, CH4, N2O, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since AB 32 was enacted, a seventh chemical, nitrogen trifluoride, has also been added to the list of GHGs.

CARB is the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of GHGs. Pursuant to AB 32, CARB adopted regulations to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and costeffective GHG emission reductions. AB 32 states the following:
“Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems.”
CARB approved the 1990 GHG emissions level of 427 million metric ton of CO2 equivalent per year (MMTCO2e) on December 6, 2007 (29). Therefore, emissions generated in California in 2020 are required to be equal to or less than 427 MMTCO2e. Emissions in 2020 in a “business as usual” (BAU) scenario were estimated to be 596 MMTCO2e, which do not account for reductions from AB 32 regulations (30). At that level, a 28.4% reduction was required to achieve the 427 MMTCO2e 1990 inventory. In October 2010, CARB prepared an updated BAU 2020 forecast to account for the recession and slower forecasted growth. The forecasted inventory without the benefits of 1878
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
adopted regulation is now estimated at 545 MMTCO2e. Therefore, under the updated forecast, a

21.7% reduction from BAU is required to achieve 1990 levels (31).

Progress in Achieving AB 32 Targets and Remaining Reductions Required The State has made steady progress in implementing AB 32 and achieving targets included in Executive Order S-3-05. The progress is shown in updated emission inventories prepared by CARB for 2000 through 2012 (32). The State has achieved the Executive Order S-3-05 target for 2010 of reducing GHG emissions to 2000 levels. As shown below, the 2010 emission inventory achieved this target.
• 1990: 427 MMTCO2e (AB 32 2020 target)
• 2000: 463 MMTCO2e (an average 8% reduction needed to achieve 1990 base) • 2010: 450 MMTCO2e (an average 5% reduction needed to achieve 1990 base) CARB has also made substantial progress in achieving its goal of achieving 1990 emissions levels by 2020. As described earlier in this section, CARB revised the 2020 BAU inventory forecast to account for new lower growth projections, which resulted in a new lower reduction from BAU to achieve the 1990 base. The previous reduction from 2020 BAU needed to achieve 1990 levels was 28.4% and the latest reduction from 2020 BAU is 21.7%. • 2020: 545 MMTCO2e BAU (an average 21.7% reduction from BAU needed to achieve 1990 base)
Senate Bill (SB) 32
On September 8, 2016, Governor Jerry Brown signed the SB 32 and its companion bill, AB 197. SB 32 requires the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, a reduction target that was first introduced in Executive Order B-30-15. The new legislation builds upon the AB 32 goal of 1990 levels by 2020 and provides an intermediate goal to achieving S-3- 05, which sets a statewide GHG reduction target of 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. AB 197 creates a legislative committee to oversee regulators to ensure that CARB not only responds to the Governor, but also the Legislature (33).

AB 197
A condition of approval for SB 32 was the passage of AB 197. AB 197 requires that CARB consider the social costs of GHG emissions and prioritize direct reductions in GHG emissions at mobile sources and large stationary sources. AB 197 also gives the California legislature more oversight over CARB through the addition of two legislatively appointed members to the CARB Board and the establishment a legislative committee to make recommendations about CARB programs to the legislature.

Executive Order B-55-18 and SB 100
Executive Order B-55-18 and SB 100. SB 100 and Executive Order B-55-18 were signed by Governor Brown on September 10, 2018. Under the existing RPS, 25% of retail sales are required to be from renewable sources by December 31, 2016, 33% by December 31, 2020, 40% by December 31, 2024, 45% by December 31, 2027, and 50% by December 31, 2030. SB 100 raises California’s RPS requirement to 50% renewable resources target by December 31, 2026, and to achieve a 60% target by December 31, 2030. SB 100 also requires that retail sellers and local 1879
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
publicly owned electric utilities procure a minimum quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources so that the total kilowatt hours of those products sold to their retail end-use customers achieve 44% of retail sales by December 31, 2024, 52% by December 31, 2027, and 60% by December 31, 2030. In addition to targets under AB 32 and SB 32, Executive Order B55-18 establishes a carbon neutrality goal for the state of California by 2045; and sets a goal to maintain net negative emissions thereafter. The Executive Order directs the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA), California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), the Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), and CARB to include sequestration targets in the Natural and Working Lands Climate Change Implementation Plan consistent with the carbon neutrality goal.

Title 24 California Code of Regulations (CCR)
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: The California Energy Code was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.

The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficient technologies and methods. CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, industrial, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on August 1, 2009, and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission.

CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2022 California Green Building Code Standards that was effective on January 1, 20237. As construction of the Project is anticipated to be completed in 2025, the Project would be required to comply with the Title 24 standards in place at that time.

SCAQMD
SCAQMD is the agency responsible for air quality planning and regulation in the SCAB. The SCAQMD addresses the impacts to climate change of projects subject to SCAQMD permit as a lead agency if they are the only agency having discretionary approval for the project and acts as a responsible agency when a land use agency must also approve discretionary permits for the project. The SCAQMD acts as an expert commenting agency for impacts to air quality. This expertise carries over to GHG emissions, so the agency helps local land use agencies through the development of models and emission thresholds that can be used to address GHG emissions.

In 2008, SCAQMD formed a Working Group to identify GHG emissions thresholds for land use projects that could be used by local lead agencies in the SCAB. The Working Group developed several different options that are contained in the SCAQMD Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold, that could be applied by lead agencies. The working group has not provided additional guidance since release of the interim guidance in 2008. The SCAQMD Board has not approved the thresholds; however, the Guidance Document provides substantial evidence supporting the approaches to significance of GHG emissions that can be considered by the lead agency in adopting its own threshold. The current interim thresholds consist of the following tiered approach:
7 The 2022 California Green Building Standard Code will be published July 1, 2022. 1880
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
• Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA.
• Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a GHG reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local GHG reduction plan, it does not have significant GHG emissions.
• Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant:
o Residential and commercial land use: 3,000 metric ton of CO2 equivalent (MTCO2e/yr)
o Industrial land use: 10,000 MTCO2e/yr
o Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e/yr; commercial: 1,400 MTCO2e/yr; or mixed use: 3,000 MTCO2e/yr
• Tier 4 has the following options:
o Option 1: Reduce Business-as-Usual (BAU) emissions by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined.
o Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures o Option 3: 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employees: 4.8 MTCO2e per SP per year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e per SP per year for plans;
o Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e per SP per year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e per SP per year for plans
• Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold.

The SCAQMD’s interim thresholds used the Executive Order S-3-05-year 2050 goal as the basis for the Tier 3 screening level. Achieving the Executive Order’s objective would contribute to worldwide efforts to cap CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm, thus stabilizing global climate.

SCAQMD only has authority over GHG emissions from development projects that include air quality permits. At this time, it is unknown if the project would include stationary sources of emissions subject to SCAQMD permits. Notwithstanding, if the Project requires a stationary permit, it would be subject to the applicable SCAQMD regulations.

SCAQMD Regulation XXVII, adopted in 2009 includes the following rules:
• Rule 2700 defines terms and post global warming potentials. • Rule 2701, Southern California (SoCal) Climate Solutions Exchange, establishes a voluntary program to encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified GHG emission reductions in the SCAQMD.
1881
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
• Rule 2702, GHG Reduction Program created a program to produce GHG emission reductions within the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties.

SCAQMD is the agency responsible for air quality planning and regulation in the SCAB. The SCAQMD addresses the impacts to climate change of projects subject to SCAQMD permit as a lead agency if they are the only agency having discretionary approval for the project and acts as a responsible agency when a land use agency must also approve discretionary permits for the project. The SCAQMD acts as an expert commenting agency for impacts to air quality. This expertise carries over to GHG emissions, so the agency helps local land use agencies through the development of models and emission thresholds that can be used to address GHG emissions.

City of Ontario Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP)
The Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP) contains further guidance on the City of Ontario’s GHG Inventory reduction goals, policies, guidelines, and implementation programs. The purpose of the CCAP is to provide guidance on how to analyze GHG emissions and determine significance during the CEQA review of proposed development projects within the City of Ontario (34). The CCAP builds upon the Reduction Plan to address City-specific information and City-specific GHG reduction measures. To address the state’s requirement to reduce GHG emissions, the CCAP was prepared with the goal of reducing GHG emissions within the City by 15% below 2008 levels by the year 2020. The City’s target is consistent with the AB 32 target and ensures that the City of Ontario achieves GHG reductions locally that complement and are consistent with state efforts to reduce GHG emissions.

As part of the CCAP, the City of Ontario published a guidance document titled “Greenhouse Gas Emissions, CEQA Thresholds and Screening Tables” (December 2014). As part of this guidance, the CCAP determined that if GHG emissions of a given project exceeds 3,000 MTCO2e/yr, then project emissions would need to be reduced by 25 percent when compared to year 2008 emissions levels. Alternatively, the project would need to achieve a minimum of 100 points pursuant to measures identified in the Screening Tables.

The 2022 update to the Ontario Plan includes an update to the City’s CCAP which was originally adopted on December 16, 2014. As stated in The Ontario Plan 2050 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), the measures included in the 2022 update to the CCAP are not substantially different than that of the 2014 CCAP and therefore there is no change in the environmental impacts associated with the CCAP.

GHG IMPACTS
Standards of Significance
According to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G thresholds, to determine whether impacts from GHG emissions are significant. Would the project:
• Threshold 1: Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
• Threshold 2: Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs?
1882
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
The evaluation of an impact under CEQA requires measuring data from a project against both existing conditions and a “threshold of significance.” For establishing significance thresholds, the Office of Planning and Research’s amendments to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(c) state “[w]hen adopting thresholds of significance, a lead agency may consider thresholds of significance previously adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts, provided the decision of the lead agency to adopt such thresholds is supported by substantial evidence.”
Discussion on Establishment of Significance Thresholds
As previously stated, SEIR identifies that the measures included in the 2022 update to the CCAP are not substantially different than that of the 2014 CCAP and therefore there is no change in the environmental impacts associated with the CCAP. As such, and consistent with the 2014 CCAP, this analysis relies on the annual screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr to define small projects that are considered less than significant and do not require further GHG emissions calculations or analysis. Projects that do not exceed an annual 3,000 MTCO2e/yr are therefore considered less than significant and would not require further analysis or mitigation.

GHG IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 1
Would the Project have the potential to generate direct or indirect GHG emissions that would result in a significant impact on the environment?

PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS
The estimated GHG emissions for the Project land use are summarized on Table 13. The estimated GHG emissions include emissions from Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), Nitrous Oxide (N2O), and Refrigerants (R). As shown on Table 13, the Project would generate a total of approximately 929.68 MTCO2e/yr. Detailed operation model outputs for the proposed Project are presented in Attachment A.

TABLE 13: TOTAL PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS
Source Emission (lbs/day)
CO2 CH4 N2O R Total CO2e
Annual construction-related emissions
amortized over 30 years 16.23 7.19E-04 3.42E-04 3.84E-03 16.35 Mobile Source 522.99 0.03 0.04 0.80 537.00
Area Source 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.26
Energy Source 266.25 0.02 0.00 0.00 267.52
Water 20.26 0.47 0.01 0.00 35.28
Waste 6.85 0.68 0.00 0.00 23.95
Refrigerants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.96
On-Site Equipment Source 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.37
Total CO2e (All Sources) 929.68
1883
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
TOP 2050 GHG EMISSIONS
The estimated GHG emissions from the TOP 2050 adopted Industrial land use designation are summarized on Table 14. Detailed operation model outputs for the TOP 2050 adopted Industrial land use designation are presented in Attachment D.

TABLE 14: TOP 2050 GHG EMISSIONS
Source Emission (lbs/day)
CO2 CH4 N2O R Total CO2e
Mobile Source 967.23 0.06 0.08 1.63 993.85
Area Source 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.24
Energy Source 462.97 0.04 0.00 0.00 465.16
Water 35.39 0.83 0.02 0.00 62.06
Waste 12.15 1.21 0.00 0.00 42.51
Refrigerants 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70 1.70
On-Site Equipment Source 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.37
Total CO2e (All Sources) 1,614.88
PROJECT NET NEW GHG EMISSIONS – COMPARISON TO TOP 2050
Table 15 shows the Project is anticipated to generate less GHG emissions per day as compared to emissions generated by the TOP 2050 adopted Industrial land use designation.

TABLE 15: PROJECT NET NEW GHG EMISSIONS
Emission Source Total CO2e
Proposed Project 929.68
TOP 2050 1,614.88
Net Emissions (Proposed – TOP 2050) -685.20

EXISTING BUILDING GHG EMISSIONS
The estimated GHG emissions from the existing buildings are summarized on Table 16. Detailed operation model outputs for the existing buildings are presented in Attachment E. 1884
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
TABLE 16: EXISTING BUILDING GHG EMISSIONS
Source Emission (lbs/day)
CO2 CH4 N2O R Total CO2e
Mobile Source 660.39 0.02 0.04 2.02 674.32
Area Source 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51
Energy Source 43.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.65
Water 8.06 0.19 0.00 0.00 14.13
Waste 2.10 0.21 0.00 0.00 7.34
Refrigerants 660.39 0.02 0.04 2.02 674.32
Total CO2e (All Sources) 739.94
PROJECT NET NEW GHG EMISSIONS – COMPARISON TO EXISTING BUILDING Table 17 shows the Project is anticipated to generate more GHG emissions per day as compared to emissions generated by the existing building, additionally; the proposed Projects emissions would still be less than the applicable thresholds.

TABLE 17: PROJECT NET NEW GHG EMISSIONS
Emission Source Total CO2e
Proposed Project 929.68
Existing Building 739.94
Net Emissions (Proposed – Existing) 189.74
As discussed within the CCAP, projects that generate less than 3,000 MTCO2e/yr would have a less-than-significant GHG emissions impact. As shown on Table 17, the proposed Project would generate a total of 189.74 MTCO2e/yr and would therefore not exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e/yr significance threshold and a less than significant impact is expected.

GHG IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 2
Would the Project have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs? Pursuant to 15604.4 of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency may rely on qualitative analysis or performance-based standards to determine the significance of impacts from GHG emissions (35).

The 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality (2022 Scoping Plan) lays out a path to achieve targets for carbon neutrality and reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 85 percent below 1990 levels no later than 2045, as directed by Assembly Bill 1279. The actions and outcomes in the plan will achieve significant reductions in fossil fuel combustion by deploying clean technologies and fuels, further reductions in short-lived climate pollutants, support for sustainable development, increased action on natural and working lands to reduce emissions and sequester carbon, and the capture and storage of carbon (36). 1885
Nicole Morse, T&B Planning, Inc.

June 8, 2023

15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment
Finally, the Project is consistent with the general plan land use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in SCAG's Sustainable Community Strategy/Regional Transportation Plan, which pursuant to SB 375 calls for the integration of transportation, land-use and housing policies to plan for achievement of the GHG-emissions target for the region. Thus, a less than significant impact related to GHG emissions from Project construction and operation would occur and no mitigation is required.

CONCLUSION
Results of the assessment indicate that the Project is not anticipated to result in a significant impact during construction or operational activities associated with air quality and greenhouse gases.

1886
15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

REFERENCES

1. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Southern California Air Basins. [Online] https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onroad/porttruck/maps/scabc7map.pdf.

2. Ralph Propper, Patrick Wong, Son Bui, Jeff Austin, William Vance, Alvaro Alvarado, Bart Croes, and Dongmin Luo. Ambient and Emission Trends of Toxic Air Contaminants in California. American Chemical Society: Environmental Science & Technology. 2015.

3. United States Environmental Protection Agency. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). [Online] 1990. https://www.epa.gov/environmental-topics/air-topics.

4. Environmental Protection Agency. Air Pollution and the Clean Air Act. [Online] http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/.

5. 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment Summary: Title I. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/cleanair-act-overview/1990-clean-air-act-amendment-summary-title-i.

6. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment Summary: Title II. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/1990- clean-air-act-amendment-summary-title-ii.

7. Air Resources Board. California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). [Online] 2009. [Cited: April 16, 2018.] http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/caaqs.htm.

8. Environmental Protection Agency. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). [Online] 1990. https://www.epa.gov/environmental-topics/air-topics.

9. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. [Online] April 2016. http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf.

10. South Coast Air Quality Management District. RULE 403. FUGITIVE DUST. [Online] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule403.pdf?sfvrsn=4.

11. —. RULE 1113. Architectural Coatings. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf.

12. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). [Online] May 2022. www.caleemod.com.

13. State of California. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020.

14. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

15. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod. CalEEMod. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6.

16. State of California. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020. 1887
15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

17. Urban Crossroads, Inc. First Grove Addendum Trip Generation Assessment. 2023.

18. South Coast Air Quality Management District. SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results. 2014.

19. —. Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology. s.l. : South Coast Air Quality Managment District, 2003.

20. —. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). [Online] March 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-qualitymanagement-plans/2016-air-quality-management-plan/final-2016- aqmp/final2016aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=11.

21. Southern California Association of Governments. 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. [Online] September 2020. https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocalplan_0.pdf?1606001176.

22. South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993). 1993.

23. City of Ontario. TOP 2050. [Online] 2022.
https://www.ontarioca.gov/sites/default/files/OntarioFiles/Planning/The%20Ontario%20Plann/Land%20Use/Figure%20LU02%20%20Land%20Use%20Designations%20Summary%20Table_1.pdf.

24. Goss, Tracy A and Kroeger, Amy. White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution. [Online] South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2003.
http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/ciwg/final_white_paper.pdf.

25. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2003 Air Quality Management Plan. [Online] 2003. https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-plans/airquality-mgt-plan/2003-aqmp.

26. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. [Online] http://www.baaqmd.gov/.

27. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2003 Air Quality Management Plan. [Online] 2003. https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-plans/airquality-mgt-plan/2003-aqmp.

28. —. RULE 402 NUISANCE. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rulebook/rule-iv/rule-402.pdf.

29. California Air Resources Board. GHG 1990 Emissions Level & 2020 Limit. California Air Resources Board. [Online] https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ghg-2020-limit.

30. —. Climate Change Draft Scoping Plan. 2008.

31. —. STATUS OF SCOPING PLAN RECOMMENDED MEASURES. [Online] [Cited: September 19, 2019.]
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/status_of_scoping_plan_measures.pdf.

32. —. First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan. 2014. 1888
15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

33. California Legislative Information. Senate Bill No. 32. [Online] September 8, 2016. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB3

2. 34. City of Ontario. City of Ontario Climate Action Plan. 2014.

35. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2018 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2018.

36. California Air Resources Board. 2022 Scopuing Plan Documents. [Online] https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/ab-32-climate-change-scopingplan/2022-scoping-plan-documents. 1889
15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

ATTACHMENT A

CALEEMOD PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL

OUTPUTS
1890
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 1 / 33
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.11. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
1891
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 2 / 33

3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
1892
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 3 / 33

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
1893
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 4 / 33

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
1894
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 5 / 33

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Construction Start Date 8/1/2024
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 2042 S Grove Ave, Ontario, CA 91761, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5296
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.13

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Industrial Park 61.9 1000sqft 1.42 61,867 23,452 — — —
1895
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 6 / 33
Parking Lot 100 Space 0.90 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

1.88 Acre 1.88 0.00 0.00 — — —
User Defined
Industrial

61.9 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.44 13.5 36.0 34.4 0.06 1.60 5.89 7.49 1.47 2.74 4.21 — 6,917 6,917 0.28 0.15 3.11 6,946 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.30 3.62 34.4 31.5 0.06 1.45 2.94 4.39 1.33 1.04 2.38 — 6,893 6,893 0.28 0.07 0.06 6,921 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.86 1.58 6.71 8.19 0.01 0.28 0.48 0.76 0.26 0.16 0.43 — 1,619 1,619 0.07 0.03 0.44 1,631 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.16 0.29 1.22 1.49 < 0.005 0.05 0.09 0.14 0.05 0.03 0.08 — 268 268 0.01 0.01 0.07 270

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
1896
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 7 / 33
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 4.44 3.74 36.0 34.4 0.06 1.60 5.89 7.49 1.47 2.74 4.21 — 6,917 6,917 0.28 0.15 2.37 6,946 2025 2.87 13.5 20.4 29.4 0.04 0.86 0.67 1.53 0.79 0.16 0.95 — 5,217 5,217 0.22 0.10 3.11 5,254 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 4.30 3.62 34.4 31.5 0.06 1.45 2.94 4.39 1.33 1.04 2.38 — 6,893 6,893 0.28 0.07 0.06 6,921 2025 1.60 1.33 11.7 15.8 0.03 0.47 0.41 0.88 0.43 0.10 0.53 — 3,213 3,213 0.14 0.07 0.05 3,238 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.86 0.72 6.71 6.75 0.01 0.28 0.48 0.76 0.26 0.16 0.43 — 1,322 1,322 0.06 0.03 0.25 1,331 2025 0.82 1.58 6.00 8.19 0.01 0.24 0.20 0.45 0.22 0.05 0.27 — 1,619 1,619 0.07 0.03 0.44 1,631 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.16 0.13 1.22 1.23 < 0.005 0.05 0.09 0.14 0.05 0.03 0.08 — 219 219 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 220 2025 0.15 0.29 1.10 1.49 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.05 — 268 268 0.01 0.01 0.07 270

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1897
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 8 / 33
Off-Road 3.12 2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06 — 1.06 0.98 — 0.98 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Equipment
Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.84 0.84 — 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.26 0.22 2.05 1.79 < 0.005 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 282 282 0.01 < 0.005 — 282 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.07 0.07 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.37 0.33 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 46.6 46.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 46.8 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.07 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 216 216 0.01 0.01 0.86 219 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.4 31.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 32.9 Hauling 0.09 0.01 0.83 0.46 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 676 676 0.07 0.11 1.42 712 1898
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 9 / 33
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 16.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.7 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.58 2.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.70 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 55.6 55.6 0.01 0.01 0.05 58.4 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.73 2.73 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.77 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.43 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.45 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.20 9.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.67

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.34 3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 5.66 5.66 — 2.69 2.69 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1899
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 10 / 33
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.99 0.90 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 145 145 0.01 < 0.005 — 146 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.16 0.16 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.18 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 24.0 24.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.08 1.48 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 252 252 0.01 0.01 1.01 256 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.42 6.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.51 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1900
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 11 / 33
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.06 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.08 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.19 3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.67 2.67 — 0.98 0.98 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.19 3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.67 2.67 — 0.98 0.98 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1901
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 12 / 33
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.19 1.88 1.65 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 362 362 0.01 < 0.005 — 363 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.04 0.34 0.30 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 59.9 59.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 60.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.10 1.69 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 288 288 0.01 0.01 1.15 292 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.4 31.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 32.9 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.11 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 264 264 0.01 0.01 0.03 267 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.4 31.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 32.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1902
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 13 / 33
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 14.9 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.72 1.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.80 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.43 2.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.46 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.55 1.30 12.2 14.2 0.03 0.54 — 0.54 0.49 — 0.49 — 2,630 2,630 0.11 0.02 — 2,639 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.18 1.64 1.92 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 355 355 0.01 < 0.005 — 356 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1903
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 14 / 33
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.30 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 58.8 58.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 59.0 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.14 0.13 0.15 1.66 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.08 0.08 — 343 343 0.02 0.01 0.04 347 Vendor 0.03 0.01 0.30 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 251 251 0.02 0.04 0.02 263 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 47.0 47.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 47.6 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.9 33.9 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 35.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.77 7.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.88 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.61 5.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.87 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1904
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 15 / 33
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

1.45 1.21 11.3 14.1 0.03 0.47 — 0.47 0.43 — 0.43 — 2,630 2,630 0.11 0.02 — 2,639 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.45 1.21 11.3 14.1 0.03 0.47 — 0.47 0.43 — 0.43 — 2,630 2,630 0.11 0.02 — 2,639 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.68 0.57 5.29 6.62 0.01 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 1,230 1,230 0.05 0.01 — 1,234 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.97 1.21 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 204 204 0.01 < 0.005 — 204 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.13 0.12 0.11 2.02 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.08 0.08 — 366 366 0.02 0.01 1.36 372 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.27 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 247 247 0.02 0.04 0.69 259 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1905
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 16 / 33
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.12 0.11 0.13 1.53 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.08 0.08 — 336 336 0.02 0.01 0.04 340 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.29 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 247 247 0.02 0.04 0.02 259 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 159 159 0.01 0.01 0.27 161 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.13 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 115 115 0.01 0.02 0.14 121 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.4 26.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 26.7 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.1 19.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 20.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.95 0.80 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 — 0.35 0.32 — 0.32 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1906
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 17 / 33
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.41 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 82.8 82.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 83.1 Paving — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.7 13.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.8 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.07 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 211 211 0.01 0.01 0.78 215 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.8 10.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 10.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1907
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 18 / 33
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.78 1.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.81 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.17 1.18 1.52 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 178 178 0.01 < 0.005 — 179 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 10.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.10 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.6 14.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.7 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1908
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 19 / 33
Off-Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.42 2.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.43 Equipment
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 73.2 73.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.27 74.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.60 5.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.68 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.93 0.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.94 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
1909
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 20 / 33

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1910
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 21 / 33

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1911
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 22 / 33
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 8/1/2024 9/11/2024 5.00 30.0 20
Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/12/2024 9/25/2024 5.00 10.0 5 Grading Grading 9/26/2024 10/23/2024 5.00 20.0 8
Building Construction Building Construction 10/24/2024 8/27/2025 5.00 220 230 Paving Paving 7/31/2025 8/27/2025 5.00 20.0 18
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/17/2025 8/27/2025 5.00 30.0 18

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 1912
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 23 / 33
Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor 1.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 9.60 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 1913
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 24 / 33
Site Preparation Vendor 0.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 1.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 26.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 8.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 5.20 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 1914 15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 25 / 33

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 92,801 30,934 7,268

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Building Square Footage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000 —
Site Preparation — — 35.0 0.00 —
Grading — — 80.0 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.78

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Industrial Park 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 0.90 100%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.88 100%
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0%
1915
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 26 / 33

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
1916
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 27 / 33
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 19.8 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 4.05 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.
1917
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 28 / 33
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 98.2
AQ-DPM 94.5 1918
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 29 / 33
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 22.4
Pesticides 34.9
Toxic Releases 83.5
Traffic 85.4
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 88.1
Groundwater 60.6
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 93.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 83.3
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 61.6
Cardio-vascular 82.1
Low Birth Weights 56.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 71.6
Housing 51.4
Linguistic 58.2
Poverty 47.3
Unemployment 92.6

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 42.07622225
1919
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 30 / 33
Employed 49.30065443
Median HI 32.60618504
Education—
Bachelor's or higher 10.88156037
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 1.873476197
Transportation—
Auto Access 33.77389965
Active commuting 11.89529065
Social—
2-parent households 89.77287309
Voting 48.35108431
Neighborhood—
Alcohol availability 44.18067496
Park access 9.70101373
Retail density 93.04504042
Supermarket access 21.12151931
Tree canopy 18.42679328
Housing—
Homeownership 49.89092776
Housing habitability 60.20787887
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 26.43397921 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 91.81316566
Uncrowded housing 22.82817914
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 47.32452201
Arthritis 11.9
1920
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 31 / 33
Asthma ER Admissions 41.5
High Blood Pressure 31.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 34.7
Coronary Heart Disease 12.2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 20.5
Diagnosed Diabetes 27.5
Life Expectancy at Birth 37.4
Cognitively Disabled 80.8
Physically Disabled 10.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.5
Mental Health Not Good 42.4
Chronic Kidney Disease 20.1
Obesity 41.7
Pedestrian Injuries 68.3
Physical Health Not Good 35.8
Stroke 22.5
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 48.9
Current Smoker 43.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 41.3
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 62.5
Elderly 16.2
English Speaking 89.3
1921
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 32 / 33
Foreign-born 46.0
Outdoor Workers 59.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 33.2
Traffic Density 84.7
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 63.9
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 63.4

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 96.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 30.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 1922
15067 - 2042 S Grove (Proposed Construction) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 33 / 33

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Construction: Construction Phases Data provided by client Building, Paving, and Architectural Coating overlap to present a conservative analysis Construction: Off-Road Equipment T/L/B replaced with Crawler Tractor to accurately calculate disturbance for Site Preparation and Grading phases.

Standard 8 hours work days
Construction: Trips and VMT Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for Demolition, Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction Construction: Architectural Coatings SCAQMD Rule 1113
1923
15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

ATTACHMENT B

CALEEMOD PROPOSED OPERATION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
1924
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 1 / 32
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
1925
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 2 / 32

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 1926
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 3 / 32

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
1927
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 4 / 32

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
1928
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 5 / 32

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
1929
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 6 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed)
Operational Year 2025
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 2042 S Grove Ave, Ontario, CA 91761, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5296
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.13

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Industrial Park 61.9 1000sqft 1.42 61,867 23,452 — — —
1930
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 7 / 32
Parking Lot 100 Space 0.90 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

1.88 Acre 1.88 0.00 0.00 — — —
User Defined
Industrial

61.9 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.81 2.97 2.50 14.1 0.04 0.07 0.98 1.05 0.07 0.18 0.25 68.8 5,204 5,272 7.29 0.34 17.7 5,575 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.27 2.47 2.60 9.69 0.03 0.06 0.98 1.05 0.06 0.18 0.25 68.8 5,029 5,098 7.29 0.35 6.09 5,390 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.52 2.71 2.53 11.3 0.03 0.07 0.92 0.99 0.06 0.17 0.24 68.8 4,870 4,938 7.28 0.33 10.6 5,230 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.28 0.49 0.46 2.06 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.01 0.03 0.04 11.4 806 818 1.21 0.06 1.76 866

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
1931
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 8 / 32
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.28 1.09 2.02 11.0 0.03 0.03 0.98 1.01 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 3,489 3,489 0.19 0.26 11.9 3,584 Area 0.48 1.86 0.02 2.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.1 Energy 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,608 1,608 0.15 0.01 — 1,616 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total 1.81 2.97 2.50 14.1 0.04 0.07 0.98 1.05 0.07 0.18 0.25 68.8 5,204 5,272 7.29 0.34 17.7 5,575 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.22 1.03 2.15 9.30 0.03 0.03 0.98 1.01 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 3,326 3,326 0.19 0.27 0.31 3,411 Area — 1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,608 1,608 0.15 0.01 — 1,616 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total 1.27 2.47 2.60 9.69 0.03 0.06 0.98 1.05 0.06 0.18 0.25 68.8 5,029 5,098 7.29 0.35 6.09 5,390 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.14 0.96 2.05 9.08 0.03 0.03 0.92 0.95 0.03 0.17 0.20 — 3,159 3,159 0.18 0.25 4.84 3,243 Area 0.33 1.72 0.02 1.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.58 7.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.61 Energy 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,608 1,608 0.15 0.01 — 1,616 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 1932
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 9 / 32
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total 1.52 2.71 2.53 11.3 0.03 0.07 0.92 0.99 0.06 0.17 0.24 68.8 4,870 4,938 7.28 0.33 10.6 5,230 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.21 0.18 0.37 1.66 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.17 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 — 523 523 0.03 0.04 0.80 537 Area 0.06 0.31 < 0.005 0.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 266 266 0.02 < 0.005 — 268 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 4.54 15.7 20.3 0.47 0.01 — 35.3 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 6.85 0.00 6.85 0.68 0.00 — 23.9 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.96 0.96
Total 0.28 0.49 0.46 2.06 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.01 0.03 0.04 11.4 806 818 1.21 0.06 1.76 866

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

1.13 1.05 0.53 10.2 0.02 0.01 0.75 0.76 0.01 0.13 0.14 — 2,076 2,076 0.08 0.05 7.41 2,101 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1933
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 10 / 32
User 0.15 0.04 1.49 0.87 0.01 0.02 0.23 0.25 0.02 0.05 0.07 — 1,414 1,414 0.11 0.21 4.48 1,483 Defined
Industrial
Total 1.28 1.09 2.02 11.0 0.03 0.03 0.98 1.01 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 3,489 3,489 0.19 0.26 11.9 3,584 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

1.07 0.99 0.59 8.43 0.02 0.01 0.75 0.76 0.01 0.13 0.14 — 1,912 1,912 0.09 0.06 0.19 1,932 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial

0.15 0.04 1.56 0.87 0.01 0.02 0.23 0.25 0.02 0.05 0.07 — 1,414 1,414 0.11 0.21 0.12 1,479 Total 1.22 1.03 2.15 9.30 0.03 0.03 0.98 1.01 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 3,326 3,326 0.19 0.27 0.31 3,411 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.18 0.17 0.10 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 302 302 0.01 0.01 0.50 306 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial

0.03 0.01 0.27 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 221 221 0.02 0.03 0.30 231 Total 0.21 0.18 0.37 1.66 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.17 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 — 523 523 0.03 0.04 0.80 537

4.2. Energy
1934
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 11 / 32

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,031 1,031 0.10 0.01 — 1,037
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 32.8 32.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.0 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,064 1,064 0.10 0.01 — 1,070 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,031 1,031 0.10 0.01 — 1,037
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 32.8 32.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.0 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,064 1,064 0.10 0.01 — 1,070 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1935
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 12 / 32
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 171 171 0.02 < 0.005 — 172
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5.43 5.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.46 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 176 176 0.02 < 0.005 — 177

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 544 544 0.05 < 0.005 — 546 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 544 544 0.05 < 0.005 — 546 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1936
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 13 / 32
Industrial 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 544 544 0.05 < 0.005 — 546 Park
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 544 544 0.05 < 0.005 — 546 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 90.1 90.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.3 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 90.1 90.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.3

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1937
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 14 / 32
Consum — 1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
er
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.48 0.44 0.02 2.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.1 Total 0.48 1.86 0.02 2.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.1 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Total 0.06 0.31 < 0.005 0.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
1938
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 15 / 32

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1939
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 16 / 32
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 4.54 15.7 20.3 0.47 0.01 — 35.3
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4.54 15.7 20.3 0.47 0.01 — 35.3

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 1940
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 17 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 6.85 0.00 6.85 0.68 0.00 — 23.9
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 6.85 0.00 6.85 0.68 0.00 — 23.9

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 1941
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 18 / 32
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.96 0.96
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.96 0.96

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1942
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 19 / 32
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1943
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 20 / 32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 1944
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 21 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1945
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 22 / 32
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Industrial Park 286 230 227 98,391 2,810 2,259 2,230 966,820 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

18.0 14.5 14.3 6,194 517 416 410 177,885
1946
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 23 / 32

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 92,801 30,934 7,268

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Industrial Park 1,079,696 349 0.0330 0.0040 1,697,632
Parking Lot 34,343 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
1947
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 24 / 32

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Industrial Park 14,306,744 376,619
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Industrial Park 76.7 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —
User Defined Industrial 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Industrial Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
User Defined 750 0.30 4.00 4.00 18.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor 1948 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 25 / 32

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration
1949
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 26 / 32

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 19.8 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 4.05 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
1950
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 27 / 32
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details
1951
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 28 / 32

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 98.2
AQ-DPM 94.5
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 22.4
Pesticides 34.9
Toxic Releases 83.5
Traffic 85.4
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 88.1
Groundwater 60.6
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 93.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 83.3
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 61.6
Cardio-vascular 82.1
Low Birth Weights 56.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 71.6
Housing 51.4
Linguistic 58.2
Poverty 47.3
1952
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 29 / 32
Unemployment 92.6

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 42.07622225
Employed 49.30065443
Median HI 32.60618504
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 10.88156037
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 1.873476197
Transportation —
Auto Access 33.77389965
Active commuting 11.89529065
Social —
2-parent households 89.77287309
Voting 48.35108431
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 44.18067496
Park access 9.70101373
Retail density 93.04504042
Supermarket access 21.12151931
Tree canopy 18.42679328
Housing —
Homeownership 49.89092776
1953
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 30 / 32
Housing habitability 60.20787887
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 26.43397921 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 91.81316566
Uncrowded housing 22.82817914
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 47.32452201
Arthritis 11.9
Asthma ER Admissions 41.5
High Blood Pressure 31.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 34.7
Coronary Heart Disease 12.2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 20.5
Diagnosed Diabetes 27.5
Life Expectancy at Birth 37.4
Cognitively Disabled 80.8
Physically Disabled 10.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.5
Mental Health Not Good 42.4
Chronic Kidney Disease 20.1
Obesity 41.7
Pedestrian Injuries 68.3
Physical Health Not Good 35.8
Stroke 22.5
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 48.9
Current Smoker 43.7
1954
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 31 / 32
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 41.3
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 62.5
Elderly 16.2
English Speaking 89.3
Foreign-born 46.0
Outdoor Workers 59.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 33.2
Traffic Density 84.7
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 63.9
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 63.4

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 96.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 30.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 1955 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 32 / 32

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Taken from site plan
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Trip Generation Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, MCY).

Truck Fleet Mix based on 2, 3 and 4 axle trucks
Operations: Architectural Coatings SCAQMD Rule 1113
Operations: Refrigerants Beginning 1 January 2025, all new air conditioning equipment may not use refrigerants with a GWP of 750 or greater.
1956
15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

ATTACHMENT C

CALEEMOD PROPOSED OPERATIONAL LST EMISSIONS MODEL

OUTPUTS
1957
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 1 / 32
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
1958
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 2 / 32

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 1959
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 3 / 32

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
1960
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 4 / 32

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
1961
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 5 / 32

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
1962
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 6 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Operational Year 2025
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 2042 S Grove Ave, Ontario, CA 91761, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5296
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.13

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Industrial Park 61.9 1000sqft 1.42 61,867 23,452 — — —
1963
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 7 / 32
Parking Lot 100 Space 0.90 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

1.88 Acre 1.88 0.00 0.00 — — —
User Defined
Industrial

61.9 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.40 2.73 0.81 5.02 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 68.8 1,814 1,883 7.16 0.11 5.90 2,100 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.87 2.23 0.81 2.63 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 68.8 1,802 1,871 7.16 0.11 5.79 2,087 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.14 2.48 0.80 4.34 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 68.8 1,804 1,873 7.16 0.11 5.83 2,089 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.21 0.45 0.15 0.79 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 11.4 299 310 1.19 0.02 0.97 346

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
1964
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 8 / 32
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.87 0.84 0.34 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 100 100 0.05 0.02 0.12 109 Area 0.48 1.86 0.02 2.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.1 Energy 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,608 1,608 0.15 0.01 — 1,616 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total 1.40 2.73 0.81 5.02 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 68.8 1,814 1,883 7.16 0.11 5.90 2,100 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.82 0.79 0.35 2.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 98.9 98.9 0.06 0.03 < 0.005 108 Area — 1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,608 1,608 0.15 0.01 — 1,616 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total 0.87 2.23 0.81 2.63 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 68.8 1,802 1,871 7.16 0.11 5.79 2,087 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.76 0.73 0.33 2.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 93.4 93.4 0.06 0.02 0.05 102 Area 0.33 1.72 0.02 1.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.58 7.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.61 Energy 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,608 1,608 0.15 0.01 — 1,616 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 1965
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 9 / 32
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total 1.14 2.48 0.80 4.34 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 68.8 1,804 1,873 7.16 0.11 5.83 2,089 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.14 0.13 0.06 0.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.5 15.5 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 16.9 Area 0.06 0.31 < 0.005 0.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 266 266 0.02 < 0.005 — 268 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 4.54 15.7 20.3 0.47 0.01 — 35.3 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 6.85 0.00 6.85 0.68 0.00 — 23.9 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.96 0.96
Total 0.21 0.45 0.15 0.79 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 11.4 299 310 1.19 0.02 0.97 346

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.85 0.83 0.17 1.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 74.4 74.4 0.04 0.02 0.10 81.7 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1966
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 10 / 32
User 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 25.8 25.8 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 27.4 Defined
Industrial
Total 0.87 0.84 0.34 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 100 100 0.05 0.02 0.12 109 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.80 0.78 0.18 2.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 72.9 72.9 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 80.4 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial

0.02 0.01 0.17 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.1 26.1 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 27.7 Total 0.82 0.79 0.35 2.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 98.9 98.9 0.06 0.03 < 0.005 108 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.14 0.13 0.03 0.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.4 11.4 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 12.6 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.04 4.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.30 Total 0.14 0.13 0.06 0.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.5 15.5 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 16.9

4.2. Energy
1967
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 11 / 32

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,031 1,031 0.10 0.01 — 1,037
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 32.8 32.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.0 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,064 1,064 0.10 0.01 — 1,070 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,031 1,031 0.10 0.01 — 1,037
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 32.8 32.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.0 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,064 1,064 0.10 0.01 — 1,070 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1968
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 12 / 32
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 171 171 0.02 < 0.005 — 172
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5.43 5.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.46 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 176 176 0.02 < 0.005 — 177

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 544 544 0.05 < 0.005 — 546 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 544 544 0.05 < 0.005 — 546 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1969
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 13 / 32
Industrial 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 544 544 0.05 < 0.005 — 546 Park
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.05 0.03 0.46 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 544 544 0.05 < 0.005 — 546 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 90.1 90.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.3 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 90.1 90.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.3

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1970
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 14 / 32
Consum — 1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
er
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.48 0.44 0.02 2.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.1 Total 0.48 1.86 0.02 2.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.1 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Total 0.06 0.31 < 0.005 0.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
1971
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 15 / 32

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 27.4 94.9 122 2.82 0.07 — 213 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1972
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 16 / 32
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 4.54 15.7 20.3 0.47 0.01 — 35.3
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4.54 15.7 20.3 0.47 0.01 — 35.3

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 1973
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 17 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 41.3 0.00 41.3 4.13 0.00 — 145 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 6.85 0.00 6.85 0.68 0.00 — 23.9
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 6.85 0.00 6.85 0.68 0.00 — 23.9

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 1974
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 18 / 32
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.78 5.78
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.96 0.96
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.96 0.96

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 19 / 32
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1976
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 20 / 32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 1977
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 21 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 22 / 32
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Industrial Park 286 230 227 98,391 37.2 29.9 29.5 12,791 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

18.0 14.5 14.3 6,194 2.34 1.88 1.86 805
1979
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 23 / 32

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 92,801 30,934 7,268

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Industrial Park 1,079,696 349 0.0330 0.0040 1,697,632
Parking Lot 34,343 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
1980
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 24 / 32

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Industrial Park 14,306,744 376,619
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Industrial Park 76.7 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —
User Defined Industrial 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Industrial Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
User Defined 750 0.30 4.00 4.00 18.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor 1981 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 25 / 32

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration
1982
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 26 / 32

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 19.8 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 4.05 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
1983
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 27 / 32
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details
1984
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 28 / 32

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 98.2
AQ-DPM 94.5
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 22.4
Pesticides 34.9
Toxic Releases 83.5
Traffic 85.4
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 88.1
Groundwater 60.6
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 93.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 83.3
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 61.6
Cardio-vascular 82.1
Low Birth Weights 56.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 71.6
Housing 51.4
Linguistic 58.2
Poverty 47.3
1985
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 29 / 32
Unemployment 92.6

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 42.07622225
Employed 49.30065443
Median HI 32.60618504
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 10.88156037
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 1.873476197
Transportation —
Auto Access 33.77389965
Active commuting 11.89529065
Social —
2-parent households 89.77287309
Voting 48.35108431
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 44.18067496
Park access 9.70101373
Retail density 93.04504042
Supermarket access 21.12151931
Tree canopy 18.42679328
Housing —
Homeownership 49.89092776
1986
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 30 / 32
Housing habitability 60.20787887
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 26.43397921 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 91.81316566
Uncrowded housing 22.82817914
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 47.32452201
Arthritis 11.9
Asthma ER Admissions 41.5
High Blood Pressure 31.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 34.7
Coronary Heart Disease 12.2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 20.5
Diagnosed Diabetes 27.5
Life Expectancy at Birth 37.4
Cognitively Disabled 80.8
Physically Disabled 10.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.5
Mental Health Not Good 42.4
Chronic Kidney Disease 20.1
Obesity 41.7
Pedestrian Injuries 68.3
Physical Health Not Good 35.8
Stroke 22.5
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 48.9
Current Smoker 43.7
1987
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 31 / 32
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 41.3
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 62.5
Elderly 16.2
English Speaking 89.3
Foreign-born 46.0
Outdoor Workers 59.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 33.2
Traffic Density 84.7
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 63.9
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 63.4

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 96.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 30.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 1988 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Proposed Operational LSTs) Detailed Report, 5/22/2023 32 / 32

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Taken from site plan
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Trip Generation Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, MCY).

Truck Fleet Mix based on 2, 3 and 4 axle trucks
Operations: Architectural Coatings SCAQMD Rule 1113
Operations: Refrigerants Beginning 1 January 2025, all new air conditioning equipment may not use refrigerants with a GWP of 750 or greater.
1989
15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

ATTACHMENT D
CALEEMOD TOP 2050 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MODEL

OUTPUTS
1990
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 1 / 31
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
1991
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 2 / 31

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 1992
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 3 / 31

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
1993
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 4 / 31

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
1994
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 5 / 31

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
1995
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 6 / 31

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050)
Operational Year 2023
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 2042 S Grove Ave, Ontario, CA 91761, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5296
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.13

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Industrial Park 110 1000sqft 2.52 109,817 0.00 — — —
1996
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 7 / 31
User Defined
Industrial
110 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

1.68 Acre 1.68 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.46 5.45 4.95 27.9 0.07 0.12 1.74 1.86 0.12 0.32 0.45 122 9,434 9,556 13.0 0.64 34.4 10,105 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.49 4.55 5.17 19.5 0.06 0.12 1.74 1.86 0.12 0.32 0.44 122 9,108 9,230 13.0 0.65 10.9 9,758 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.92 4.96 5.01 22.4 0.06 0.12 1.64 1.76 0.12 0.31 0.42 122 8,817 8,939 13.0 0.62 20.1 9,468 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.53 0.91 0.91 4.08 0.01 0.02 0.30 0.32 0.02 0.06 0.08 20.2 1,460 1,480 2.15 0.10 3.33 1,568

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 1997 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 8 / 31
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.52 2.13 4.10 22.4 0.06 0.06 1.74 1.80 0.05 0.32 0.38 — 6,453 6,453 0.39 0.49 24.2 6,634 Area 0.85 3.28 0.04 4.77 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 19.6 19.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.7 Energy 0.09 0.04 0.81 0.68 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 2,796 2,796 0.26 0.02 — 2,810 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 48.7 165 214 5.01 0.12 — 375 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 0.00 73.4 7.33 0.00 — 257 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.3 10.3
Total 3.46 5.45 4.95 27.9 0.07 0.12 1.74 1.86 0.12 0.32 0.45 122 9,434 9,556 13.0 0.64 34.4 10,105 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.40 2.01 4.36 18.8 0.06 0.06 1.74 1.80 0.05 0.32 0.38 — 6,147 6,147 0.40 0.50 0.63 6,307 Area — 2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.09 0.04 0.81 0.68 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 2,796 2,796 0.26 0.02 — 2,810 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 48.7 165 214 5.01 0.12 — 375 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 0.00 73.4 7.33 0.00 — 257 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.3 10.3
Total 2.49 4.55 5.17 19.5 0.06 0.12 1.74 1.86 0.12 0.32 0.44 122 9,108 9,230 13.0 0.65 10.9 9,758 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.25 1.88 4.17 18.4 0.06 0.05 1.64 1.69 0.05 0.31 0.36 — 5,842 5,842 0.37 0.48 9.84 6,003 Area 0.58 3.04 0.03 3.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 — 13.5 13.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.5 Energy 0.09 0.04 0.81 0.68 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 2,796 2,796 0.26 0.02 — 2,810 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 48.7 165 214 5.01 0.12 — 375 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 0.00 73.4 7.33 0.00 — 257 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.3 10.3
1998
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 9 / 31
Total 2.92 4.96 5.01 22.4 0.06 0.12 1.64 1.76 0.12 0.31 0.42 122 8,817 8,939 13.0 0.62 20.1 9,468 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.41 0.34 0.76 3.36 0.01 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 967 967 0.06 0.08 1.63 994 Area 0.11 0.55 0.01 0.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.23 2.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.24 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.12 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 463 463 0.04 < 0.005 — 465 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 8.06 27.3 35.4 0.83 0.02 — 62.1 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 12.2 0.00 12.2 1.21 0.00 — 42.5 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.70 1.70
Total 0.53 0.91 0.91 4.08 0.01 0.02 0.30 0.32 0.02 0.06 0.08 20.2 1,460 1,480 2.15 0.10 3.33 1,568

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

2.22 2.05 1.14 20.7 0.04 0.02 1.33 1.35 0.02 0.23 0.24 — 3,866 3,866 0.17 0.11 16.4 3,920 User
Defined
Industrial

0.30 0.07 2.97 1.70 0.02 0.04 0.41 0.45 0.04 0.10 0.13 — 2,587 2,587 0.22 0.38 7.72 2,714 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2.52 2.13 4.10 22.4 0.06 0.06 1.74 1.80 0.05 0.32 0.38 — 6,453 6,453 0.39 0.49 24.2 6,634 1999
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 10 / 31
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

2.10 1.94 1.26 17.1 0.04 0.02 1.33 1.35 0.02 0.23 0.24 — 3,560 3,560 0.18 0.12 0.43 3,600 User
Defined
Industrial

0.30 0.07 3.10 1.70 0.02 0.04 0.41 0.45 0.04 0.10 0.13 — 2,587 2,587 0.22 0.38 0.20 2,707 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2.40 2.01 4.36 18.8 0.06 0.06 1.74 1.80 0.05 0.32 0.38 — 6,147 6,147 0.40 0.50 0.63 6,307 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.36 0.33 0.22 3.07 0.01 < 0.005 0.23 0.23 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 — 563 563 0.03 0.02 1.11 571 User
Defined
Industrial

0.05 0.01 0.54 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.02 — 404 404 0.03 0.06 0.52 423 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.41 0.34 0.76 3.36 0.01 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 967 967 0.06 0.08 1.63 994

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2000
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 11 / 31
Industrial — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,831 1,831 0.17 0.02 — 1,841 Park
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,831 1,831 0.17 0.02 — 1,841 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,831 1,831 0.17 0.02 — 1,841
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,831 1,831 0.17 0.02 — 1,841 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 303 303 0.03 < 0.005 — 305
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 303 303 0.03 < 0.005 — 305

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 2001 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 12 / 31
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.09 0.04 0.81 0.68 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 966 966 0.09 < 0.005 — 968 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.09 0.04 0.81 0.68 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 966 966 0.09 < 0.005 — 968 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.09 0.04 0.81 0.68 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 966 966 0.09 < 0.005 — 968 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.09 0.04 0.81 0.68 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 966 966 0.09 < 0.005 — 968 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park

0.02 0.01 0.15 0.12 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 160 160 0.01 < 0.005 — 160 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 2002
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 13 / 31
Total 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.12 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 160 160 0.01 < 0.005 — 160

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.85 0.78 0.04 4.77 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 19.6 19.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.7 Total 0.85 3.28 0.04 4.77 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 19.6 19.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 14 / 31
Consum — 0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
er
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.11 0.10 0.01 0.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.23 2.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.24 Total 0.11 0.55 0.01 0.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.23 2.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.24

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 48.7 165 214 5.01 0.12 — 375
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 48.7 165 214 5.01 0.12 — 375 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 48.7 165 214 5.01 0.12 — 375
2004
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 15 / 31
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 48.7 165 214 5.01 0.12 — 375 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 8.06 27.3 35.4 0.83 0.02 — 62.1
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 8.06 27.3 35.4 0.83 0.02 — 62.1

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 0.00 73.4 7.33 0.00 — 257
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
2005
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 16 / 31
Other — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt
Surfaces
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 0.00 73.4 7.33 0.00 — 257 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 0.00 73.4 7.33 0.00 — 257
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 0.00 73.4 7.33 0.00 — 257 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.2 0.00 12.2 1.21 0.00 — 42.5
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 12.2 0.00 12.2 1.21 0.00 — 42.5

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 2006
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 17 / 31
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.3 10.3
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.3 10.3
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.3 10.3
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.3 10.3
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Industrial
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.70 1.70
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.70 1.70

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 18 / 31
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 19 / 31
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 2009
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 20 / 31
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2010
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 21 / 31
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Industrial Park 508 410 404 174,894 4,992 4,025 3,974 1,718,574 User Defined
Industrial

30.0 24.2 23.8 10,319 895 721 711 307,906
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2011
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 22 / 31

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 164,726 54,909 4,391

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Industrial Park 1,916,514 349 0.0330 0.0040 3,013,380
User Defined Industrial 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
2012
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 23 / 31
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Industrial Park 25,395,181 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Industrial Park 136 —
User Defined Industrial 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Industrial Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
User Defined 750 0.30 4.00 4.00 18.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources
2013
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 24 / 31

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year) 2014
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 25 / 31

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 19.8 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 4.05 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
2015
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 26 / 31
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract 2016
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 27 / 31
Exposure Indicators—
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 98.2
AQ-DPM 94.5
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 22.4
Pesticides 34.9
Toxic Releases 83.5
Traffic 85.4
Effect Indicators—
CleanUp Sites 88.1
Groundwater 60.6
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 93.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 83.3
Sensitive Population—
Asthma 61.6
Cardio-vascular 82.1
Low Birth Weights 56.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators—
Education 71.6
Housing 51.4
Linguistic 58.2
Poverty 47.3
Unemployment 92.6

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
2017
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 28 / 31
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 42.07622225
Employed 49.30065443
Median HI 32.60618504
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 10.88156037
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 1.873476197
Transportation —
Auto Access 33.77389965
Active commuting 11.89529065
Social —
2-parent households 89.77287309
Voting 48.35108431
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 44.18067496
Park access 9.70101373
Retail density 93.04504042
Supermarket access 21.12151931
Tree canopy 18.42679328
Housing —
Homeownership 49.89092776
Housing habitability 60.20787887
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 26.43397921 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 91.81316566
Uncrowded housing 22.82817914 2018
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 29 / 31
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 47.32452201
Arthritis 11.9
Asthma ER Admissions 41.5
High Blood Pressure 31.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 34.7
Coronary Heart Disease 12.2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 20.5
Diagnosed Diabetes 27.5
Life Expectancy at Birth 37.4
Cognitively Disabled 80.8
Physically Disabled 10.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.5
Mental Health Not Good 42.4
Chronic Kidney Disease 20.1
Obesity 41.7
Pedestrian Injuries 68.3
Physical Health Not Good 35.8
Stroke 22.5
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 48.9
Current Smoker 43.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 41.3
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
2019
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 30 / 31
Children 62.5
Elderly 16.2
English Speaking 89.3
Foreign-born 46.0
Outdoor Workers 59.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 33.2
Traffic Density 84.7
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 63.9
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 63.4

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 96.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 30.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
2020
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (TOP 2050) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 31 / 31
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip characteristics based on information provided by trip generation Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, MCY). Truck Fleet Mix based on 2, 3 and 4 axle trucks Operations: Architectural Coatings SCAQMD Rule 1113
Operations: Refrigerants Beginning 1 January 2025, all new air conditioning equipment may not use refrigerants with a GWP of 750 or greater.
2021
15067-02 AQ & GHG Assesment

ATTACHMENT E

CALEEMOD EXISTING MODEL OUTPUTS
2022
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 1 / 32
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
2023
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 2 / 32

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 2024
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 3 / 32

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
2025
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 4 / 32

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
2026
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 5 / 32

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
2027
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 6 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing)
Operational Year 2023
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 2042 S Grove Ave, Ontario, CA 91761, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5296
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.13

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

25.0 1000sqft 0.57 25,000 0.00 — — —
2028
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 7 / 32
User Defined
Industrial

25.0 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

3.63 Acre 3.63 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.75 2.18 3.98 15.1 0.04 0.07 1.40 1.47 0.07 0.29 0.35 23.7 4,500 4,524 2.54 0.26 28.8 4,693 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.49 1.93 4.20 12.2 0.04 0.07 1.40 1.47 0.07 0.29 0.35 23.7 4,338 4,362 2.55 0.26 0.75 4,505 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.59 2.02 4.20 13.0 0.04 0.07 1.38 1.44 0.07 0.28 0.35 23.7 4,292 4,316 2.55 0.26 12.2 4,469 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.29 0.37 0.77 2.38 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.06 3.93 711 715 0.42 0.04 2.02 740

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 2029 15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 8 / 32
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.55 1.40 3.85 13.9 0.04 0.06 1.40 1.46 0.06 0.29 0.34 — 4,196 4,196 0.11 0.23 28.8 4,295 Area 0.19 0.77 0.01 1.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.47 4.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.49 Energy 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 263 263 0.02 < 0.005 — 264 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11.1 37.6 48.7 1.14 0.03 — 85.3 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 12.7 0.00 12.7 1.27 0.00 — 44.3 Total 1.75 2.18 3.98 15.1 0.04 0.07 1.40 1.47 0.07 0.29 0.35 23.7 4,500 4,524 2.54 0.26 28.8 4,693 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.48 1.33 4.07 12.1 0.04 0.06 1.40 1.46 0.06 0.29 0.34 — 4,038 4,038 0.12 0.23 0.75 4,112 Area — 0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 263 263 0.02 < 0.005 — 264 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11.1 37.6 48.7 1.14 0.03 — 85.3 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 12.7 0.00 12.7 1.27 0.00 — 44.3 Total 1.49 1.93 4.20 12.2 0.04 0.07 1.40 1.47 0.07 0.29 0.35 23.7 4,338 4,362 2.55 0.26 0.75 4,505 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.44 1.30 4.07 12.2 0.04 0.06 1.38 1.43 0.05 0.28 0.34 — 3,989 3,989 0.12 0.23 12.2 4,073 Area 0.13 0.71 0.01 0.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.06 3.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.07 Energy 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 263 263 0.02 < 0.005 — 264 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11.1 37.6 48.7 1.14 0.03 — 85.3 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 12.7 0.00 12.7 1.27 0.00 — 44.3 Total 1.59 2.02 4.20 13.0 0.04 0.07 1.38 1.44 0.07 0.28 0.35 23.7 4,292 4,316 2.55 0.26 12.2 4,469 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.26 0.24 0.74 2.22 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 660 660 0.02 0.04 2.02 674 2030
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 9 / 32
Area 0.02 0.13 < 0.005 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.51 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.51 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 43.5 43.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.7 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1.83 6.22 8.06 0.19 < 0.005 — 14.1 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 2.10 0.00 2.10 0.21 0.00 — 7.34 Total 0.29 0.37 0.77 2.38 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.06 3.93 711 715 0.42 0.04 2.02 740

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

1.14 1.05 0.58 10.6 0.02 0.01 0.68 0.69 0.01 0.12 0.13 — 1,986 1,986 0.09 0.06 8.45 2,014 User
Defined
Industrial

0.41 0.35 3.26 3.28 0.02 0.05 0.72 0.77 0.05 0.17 0.22 — 2,209 2,209 0.03 0.17 20.3 2,282 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.55 1.40 3.85 13.9 0.04 0.06 1.40 1.46 0.06 0.29 0.34 — 4,196 4,196 0.11 0.23 28.8 4,295 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2031
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 10 / 32
Unrefrige
Warehouse-No
Rail

1.08 0.99 0.65 8.81 0.02 0.01 0.68 0.69 0.01 0.12 0.13 — 1,829 1,829 0.09 0.06 0.22 1,849 User
Defined
Industrial

0.40 0.34 3.42 3.24 0.02 0.05 0.72 0.77 0.05 0.17 0.22 — 2,209 2,209 0.03 0.17 0.53 2,262 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.48 1.33 4.07 12.1 0.04 0.06 1.40 1.46 0.06 0.29 0.34 — 4,038 4,038 0.12 0.23 0.75 4,112 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.19 0.18 0.12 1.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.12 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 301 301 0.01 0.01 0.59 305 User
Defined
Industrial

0.07 0.06 0.62 0.58 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 359 359 < 0.005 0.03 1.43 369 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.26 0.24 0.74 2.22 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 660 660 0.02 0.04 2.02 674

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2032
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 11 / 32
Unrefrige———————————— 110 110 0.01 < 0.005— 111
rated
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total———————————— 110 110 0.01 < 0.005— 111
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————— 110 110 0.01 < 0.005— 111
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total———————————— 110 110 0.01 < 0.005— 111
Annual——————————————————
Unrefrige rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————— 18.3 18.3 < 0.005 < 0.005— 18.4
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
2033
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 12 / 32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 18.3 18.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.4

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 152 152 0.01 < 0.005 — 153 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 152 152 0.01 < 0.005 — 153 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 152 152 0.01 < 0.005 — 153 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 2034
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 13 / 32
Total 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 152 152 0.01 < 0.005 — 153 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 25.2 25.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 25.3 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 25.2 25.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 25.3

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.19 0.18 0.01 1.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.47 4.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.49 Total 0.19 0.77 0.01 1.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.47 4.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.49 2035
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 14 / 32
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.51 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.51 Total 0.02 0.13 < 0.005 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.51 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.51

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2036
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 15 / 32
Unrefrige——————————— 11.1 37.6 48.7 1.14 0.03— 85.3
rated
Warehou
Rail
User
Defined
Industrial
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 11.1 37.6 48.7 1.14 0.03— 85.3
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 11.1 37.6 48.7 1.14 0.03— 85.3
User
Defined
Industrial
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 11.1 37.6 48.7 1.14 0.03— 85.3
Annual——————————————————
Unrefrige rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 1.83 6.22 8.06 0.19 < 0.005— 14.1
User
Defined
Industrial
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
2037
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 16 / 32
Other — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt
Surfaces
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 1.83 6.22 8.06 0.19 < 0.005 — 14.1

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.7 0.00 12.7 1.27 0.00 — 44.3
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 12.7 0.00 12.7 1.27 0.00 — 44.3 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.7 0.00 12.7 1.27 0.00 — 44.3
2038
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 17 / 32
User — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Defined
Industrial
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 12.7 0.00 12.7 1.27 0.00 — 44.3 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.10 0.00 2.10 0.21 0.00 — 7.34
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.10 0.00 2.10 0.21 0.00 — 7.34

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2039
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 18 / 32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 2040
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 19 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
2041
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 20 / 32

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2042
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 21 / 32

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2043
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 22 / 32
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
261 245 244 93,534 2,565 2,406 2,397 919,096
User Defined
Industrial
109 102 102 39,062 1,666 1,562 1,557 596,860
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 37,500 12,500 9,477
2044
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 23 / 32

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
115,468 349 0.0330 0.0040 475,267
User Defined Industrial 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 5,781,250 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
2045
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 24 / 32
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 23.5 —
User Defined Industrial 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —
2046
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 25 / 32

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 19.8 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 4.05 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
2047
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 26 / 32
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
2048
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 27 / 32
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 98.2
AQ-DPM 94.5
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 22.4
Pesticides 34.9
Toxic Releases 83.5
Traffic 85.4
Effect Indicators —
2049
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 28 / 32
CleanUp Sites 88.1
Groundwater 60.6
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 93.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 83.3
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 61.6
Cardio-vascular 82.1
Low Birth Weights 56.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 71.6
Housing 51.4
Linguistic 58.2
Poverty 47.3
Unemployment 92.6

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 42.07622225
Employed 49.30065443
Median HI 32.60618504
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 10.88156037
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 1.873476197
2050
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 29 / 32
Transportation—
Auto Access 33.77389965
Active commuting 11.89529065
Social—
2-parent households 89.77287309
Voting 48.35108431
Neighborhood—
Alcohol availability 44.18067496
Park access 9.70101373
Retail density 93.04504042
Supermarket access 21.12151931
Tree canopy 18.42679328
Housing—
Homeownership 49.89092776
Housing habitability 60.20787887
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 26.43397921 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 91.81316566
Uncrowded housing 22.82817914
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 47.32452201
Arthritis 11.9
Asthma ER Admissions 41.5
High Blood Pressure 31.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 34.7
Coronary Heart Disease 12.2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 20.5
2051
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 30 / 32
Diagnosed Diabetes 27.5
Life Expectancy at Birth 37.4
Cognitively Disabled 80.8
Physically Disabled 10.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.5
Mental Health Not Good 42.4
Chronic Kidney Disease 20.1
Obesity 41.7
Pedestrian Injuries 68.3
Physical Health Not Good 35.8
Stroke 22.5
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 48.9
Current Smoker 43.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 41.3
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 62.5
Elderly 16.2
English Speaking 89.3
Foreign-born 46.0
Outdoor Workers 59.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity—
Impervious Surface Cover 33.2
Traffic Density 84.7
Traffic Access 23.0
2052
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 31 / 32
Other Indices —
Hardship 63.9
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 63.4

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 96.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 30.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Taken from site plan
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip characteristics provided by information based on trip generation 2053
15067 - 2042 S Grove Ave (Existing) Detailed Report, 6/5/2023 32 / 32
Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, MCY). Truck Fleet Mix based on 2, 3 and 4 axle trucks Operations: Architectural Coatings SCAQMD Rule 1113
2054
RESOLUTION NO. PC24-009

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF FILE NO. PSPA22-007, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GROVE AVENUE SPECIFIC PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF 4.20

ACRES OF LAND FROM OFFICE/COMMERCIAL TO BUSINESS PARK
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2042 S. GROVE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0105-049-111.

WHEREAS, First Industrial Realty Trust (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant") has filed an Application for the approval of a Specific Plan Amendment, File No. PSPA22-007, as described in the title of this Resolution (hereinafter referred to as "Application" or "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Application applies to 4.20 acres of land generally located north of Philadelphia Street and west of Grove Avenue, at 2042 S. Grove Avenue within the Office/Commercial land use designation of the Grove Avenue Specific Plan, and is presently improved with an existing office and warehouse/storage building with surface parking; and
WHEREAS, the properties to the north and east of the Project site are within the Business Park land use designation of the Grove Avenue Specific Plan and are developed with industrial business parks. The property to the south is within the Office/Commercial land use designation of the Grove Avenue Specific Plan and is developed with business park buildings. The properties to the west are within the General Industrial (IG) zoning designation, and are developed with industrial structures, outdoor storage yards and RV parking; and
WHEREAS, the Grove Avenue Specific Plan was adopted in 1993 to help facilitate development of the Grove Avenue corridor as a light industrial and limited commercial business park. The specific plan covers approximately 250 acres of land along the east and west side of Grove Avenue between Mission Boulevard to the north and State Route 60 (Pomona Freeway) to the south. At the time of the specific plan’s establishment, there were several driving factors that helped form the specific plan, such as the direct connection to the Ontario Airport and the increasing growth of industrial development; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment to the Grove Avenue Specific Plan will change the land use designation on the subject site from Office/Commercial to Business Park. This Specific Plan Amendment will facilitate the future development of a new 61,867 square foot industrial building with associated site improvements on the 4.20-acre Project site. The requested land use change will coordinate well with the existing land uses to the 2055
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA22-007
March 26, 2024

north and east, as they are currently designated for Business Park and are improved with business park industrial uses; and
WHEREAS, to analyze the traffic impacts of the requested land use change, a Trip Generation Assessment was prepared in accordance with the traffic study requirements of the City of Ontario and the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) Congestion Management Program (CMP). As a result, the Project is anticipated to generate 204 fewer two-way trips per day as compared to the adopted TOP 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364) certified by the Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, the applicant has also submitted a Development Plan application (File No. PDEV22-040) to demolish an existing office and warehouse/storage building and construct a new 61,867 square-foot industrial building with associated site improvements within the 4.20-acre Project site located at 2042 S. Grove Avenue; and
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2024, the Development Advisory Board conducted a hearing regarding the related Development Plan (File No. PDEV22-040) and approved the Project, subject to City Council approval of this Specific Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364) certified by the Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022 (hereinafter referred to as "Certified EIR"), in which development and use of the Project site was discussed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director of the City of Ontario prepared and approved for attachment to the certified Environmental Impact Report, an Addendum to the Certified EIR (hereinafter referred to as "EIR Addendum") in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, together with State and local guidelines implementing said Act, all as amended to date (collectively referred to as "CEQA"); and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of this project were thoroughly analyzed in the EIR Addendum, which concluded that implementation of the Project could result in a number of significant effects on the environment that were previously analyzed in the Certified EIR, and that the Certified EIR identified mitigation measures that would reduce each of those significant effects to a less-than-significant level; and WHEREAS, the City's "Local Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" provide for the use of a single environmental assessment in situations where the impacts of subsequent projects are adequately analyzed; and
2056
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA22-007
March 26, 2024

WHEREAS, the Application is a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act — Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. — (hereinafter referred to as "CEQA") and an EIR Addendum has been prepared to determine possible environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, Ontario Development Code Table 2.02-1 (Review Matrix) grants the Planning Commission the responsibility and authority to review and make recommendation to the City Council on the subject Application; and WHEREAS, the Project has been reviewed for consistency with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan component of The Ontario Plan, as State Housing Element law (as prescribed in Government Code Sections 65580 through 65589.8) requires that development projects must be consistent with the Housing Element, if upon consideration of all its aspects, it is found to further the purposes, principals, goals, and policies of the Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, the Project is located within the Airport Influence Area of Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and is subject to, and must be consistent with, the policies and criteria set forth in the Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (hereinafter referred to as "ALUCP"), which applies only to jurisdictions within San Bernardino County, and addresses the noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity; and
WHEREAS, City of Ontario Development Code Division 2.03 (Public Hearings) prescribes the manner in which public notification shall be provided and hearing procedures to be followed, and all such notifications and procedures have been completed; and
WHEREAS, as the first action on the Project, on March 26, 2024, the Planning Commission issued a Resolution recommending the City Council adopt the EIR Addendum, finding that the proposed Project introduces no new significant environmental impacts and applying all previously adopted mitigation measures to the Project, which were incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the Project, and concluded said hearing on that date; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED, AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario, as follows:
2057
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA22-007
March 26, 2024

SECTION 1: Environmental Determination and Findings. As the recommending body for the Project, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Addendum, the initial study, and the administrative record for the Project, including all written and oral evidence provided during the comment period. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Addendum, the initial study, and the administrative record, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
(1) The environmental impacts of this project were reviewed in conjunction with an Addendum to The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364), certified by the Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022 related to File No. PGA20-002; and
(2) The EIR Addendum and administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Ontario Local CEQA Guidelines; and
(3) The City's "Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" provide for the use of a single environmental assessment in situations where the impacts of subsequent projects are adequately analyzed. This Application introduces no new significant environmental impacts; and (4) All previously adopted mitigation measures shall be a condition of project approval, as they are applicable to the Project, and are incorporated herein by this reference; and
(5) The EIR Addendum contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project, and reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and
(6) There is no substantial evidence in the administrative record supporting a fair argument that the project may result in significant environmental impacts.

SECTION 2: Subsequent or Supplemental Environmental Review Not Required. Based on the EIR Addendum, all related information presented to the Planning Commission, and the specific findings set forth in Section 1, above, the Planning Commission finds that the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Certified EIR is not required for the Project, as the Project:
(1) Does not constitute substantial changes to the Certified EIR (The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364) certified by Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022) that will require major 2058
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA22-007
March 26, 2024

revisions to the Certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
(2) Does not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Certified EIR (The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364) certified by Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022) was prepared, that will require major revisions to the Certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; and (3) Does not contain new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Certified EIR (The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364) certified by Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022) was certified/adopted, that shows any of the following:
(a) The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Certified EIR (The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364) certified by Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022); or
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the Certified EIR (The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364) certified by Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022); or
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the City declined to adopt such measures; or (d) Mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the Certified EIR (The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364) certified by Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022) would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the City declined to adopt.

SECTION 3: Housing Element Compliance. Pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 3, Article 10.6, commencing with Section 65580, as the recommending body for the Project, the Planning Commission finds that based upon the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation, at the time of Project implementation, the Project is consistent with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan (General Plan) component of The Ontario Plan, as the project site is not 2059
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA22-007
March 26, 2024

one of the properties in the Housing Element Sites Inventory contained in Tables B-1 and B-2 of the Housing Element Technical Report.

SECTION 4: Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ("ALUCP") Compliance.

The California State Aeronautics Act (Public Utilities Code Section 21670 et seq.) requires that an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan be prepared for all public use airports in the State; and requires that local land use plans and individual development proposals must be consistent with the policies set forth in the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.
(1) On April 19, 2011, the City Council of the City of Ontario approved and adopted the Ontario International Airport Land use Compatibility Plan, establishing the Airport Influence Area for Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and limits future land uses and development within the Airport Influence Area, as they relate to noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity. As the recommending body for the Project, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation against the ONT ALUCP compatibility factors, including [1] Safety Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-2) and Safety Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-2), [2] Noise Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-3) and Noise Impact Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-3), [3] Airspace protection Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-4), and [4] Overflight Notification Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-5). As a result, the Planning Commission, therefore, finds and determines that the Project, when implemented in conjunction with the conditions of approval, will be consistent with the policies and criteria set forth within the ONT ALUCP; and SECTION 5: Concluding Facts and Reasons. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced hearing, and upon the specific findings set forth in Sections 1 through 4, above, the Planning Commission hereby concludes as follows:
(1) The proposed Specific Plan, or amendment thereto, is consistent with the goals, policies, plans and exhibits of the Vision, Policy Plan (General Plan), and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan. The proposed Amendment to the Grove Avenue Specific Plan will change the land use designation on 4.20 acres of land from Office/Commercial to Business Park for property located at 2042 S. Grove Avenue. The proposed amendment is consistent with TOP’s Vision, which states “in order to take advantage opportunities or remove impediments to achieving our Vision, we need the ability to quickly respond to changing market needs,” and TOP’s Policy Plan (General Plan) goals and policies, which states “LU3-3 Land Use Flexibly. We consider uses not typically permitted within a land use category if doing so improves livability, reduces vehicular trips, creates community gathering places and activity nodes, and helps create identity;” and
2060
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA22-007
March 26, 2024

(2) The proposed Specific Plan, or amendment thereto, would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City. With the proposed amendments to the Grove Avenue Specific Plan, the proposed land use change will be in conformance with The Ontario Plan (TOP) Policy Plan Land Use Plan and will comply with the Policy Plan goals and policies applicable to the Specific Plan. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City because it will provide a land use that is consistent with the surrounding area to the north and east, that is currently improved with business park and industrial developments; and (3) In the case of an application affecting specific property(ies), the proposed Specific Plan, or amendment thereto, will not adversely affect the harmonious relationship with adjacent properties and land uses. The proposed amendment will modify the land use from Office/Commercial to Business Park, which aligns with surrounding land uses and allows for similar development intensities under the Business Park designation; and
(4) In the case of an application affecting specific property(ies), the subject site is physically suitable, including, but not limited to, parcel size, shape, access, and availability of utilities, for the request and anticipated development.

The proposed amendment will allow for light industrial uses on the subject site under the Business Park land use designation of the Grove Avenue Specific Plan. The project site is suitable in size and shape, and contains adequate street frontage along Grove Avenue for sufficient access and availability of utilities to accommodate a light industrial development that is similar in scale and intensity to other existing developments within the Specific Plan area and under the Business Park designation; and SECTION 6: Planning Commission Action. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1 through 5, above, the Planning Commission hereby RECOMMENDS THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE the herein described Application, subject to each and every condition set forth in the Department reports attached hereto as "Attachment A," and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 7: Indemnification. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Ontario or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Ontario or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval. The City of Ontario shall promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and the City of Ontario shall cooperate fully in the defense.

SECTION 8: Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located 2061
2062
2063
Planning Commission Resolution
File No. PSPA22-007
March 26, 2024