Agenda packet, first session — Ontario City Council, September 15, 2026 (part 2 of 4)

Executed on this ___ day of ___________________________, 2026 by:

Client: Populous
Sanjiv Bajaj
Walter P Moore and Associates, Inc.:

Joseph Moody, S.E.

Managing Director | Principal

177
Department: Community Life & Culture
Prepared By: Lacey A Rightmer
Staff Member Presenting: Helen McAlary,
Executive Director Community Life and Culture
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 12
SUBJECT:

AMERICORPS STATE CONTINUATION GRANT FOR 2026-27

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
September 15, 2026
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute grant documents and accept a $368,000 AmeriCorps Continuation Grant for the October 2026 through September 2027 program year to support the Ontario Promise Corps Program.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Pursue City's Goals and Objectives by Working with Other Governmental Agencies Encourage, Provide or Support Enhanced Recreational, Educational, Cultural and Healthy City Programs, Policies and Activities
FISCAL IMPACT:

The Community Life & Culture Agency has been awarded $368,000 from AmeriCorps, a federal agency, to continue the Ontario Promise Corps Program during Fiscal Year 2026-27. If approved, the grant revenue will be included in the Grants Fund at a future quarterly budget update for City Council approval. The FY 2026-27 Adopted Budget includes General Fund appropriations for the City's required cash match. The Ontario-Montclair Schools Foundation, the program partner, will reimburse the City $15,000 toward the City's cash match obligation.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

On August 20, 2019, the City Council approved a 12-month AmeriCorps State Planning Grant. This grant was used to develop Ontario Promise Corps, a cradle- to-career program designed to support local residents from early childhood through college and career. The program focuses on improving school readiness and attendance, and increasing access to and success in college. AmeriCorps grants are administered in California by California Volunteers, an office of the Governor of the State of California.

In 2020, the City received additional funding to implement Ontario Promise Corps. On August 4, 2020, the City Council approved the ﬁrst 12-month program funded through an AmeriCorps State Formula Grant. The City Council has since approved additional grants for Fiscal Years 2021 through 2026.

The Ontario Promise Corps program recruits 16 full-time AmeriCorps members each program year.

Members provide one-on-one educational support to low-income and at-risk students, build positive relationships with students and families, and provide information and resources on college 178
and other higher education opportunities for Ontario residents. The program operates in partnership with Ontario-Montclair Schools Foundation and the Ontario City Library.

Ontario Promise Corps provides AmeriCorps members with an opportunity to gain professional experience while serving the local community. Members receive training, professional development, and mentorship to help them build leadership skills and prepare for future careers.

Since the program began, 63 AmeriCorps members have participated in Ontario Promise Corps, with many serving for more than one year. Through their service, members have gained valuable professional experience and developed skills that have helped them prepare for careers in teaching, counseling, law, and nursing. Many former members have gone on to pursue higher education and careers, with many continuing to work in Ontario and throughout the local region after completing their service. Three former Ontario Promise Corps members have gone on to work in City positions, illustrating how the program can develop and retain local talent.

Since its inception, Ontario Promise Corps has served 13,343 participants through a variety of educational and college and career-readiness activities. These activities include workshops for families with children ages 0 to 5 that provide parents and caregivers with tools to become their child's ﬁrst teacher and support early literacy; presentations for 6th grade students featuring local business leaders who share their personal journeys and experiences on the path to a successful career; and college ﬁeld trips that 8th grade students an opportunity to explore higher education and learn about the college experience. High School students receive college and career support, including ﬁnancial aid workshops, assistance with college applications, and continued support through students' ﬁrst year of college. Together, these activities connect students and families with resources, mentors, and real-world experiences that support educational success and help participants prepare for their future.

For the 2026-27 program year, AmeriCorps has awarded the Community Life & Culture Agency a $368,000 AmeriCorps Continuation Grant to continue the Ontario Promise Corps. The grant will support program activities from October 2026 through September 2027.

Highlights of the grant
budget include funding for a full-time Administrative Specialist who is 100% dedicated to managing the day-to-day operations of the grant, with a total salary and beneﬁts cost of $132,548. The grant also provides annual living allowances of $30,000 for each of the 16 AmeriCorps members, as well as funding for healthcare, oﬃce supplies, training, and equipment. Additionally, the grant funds a part-time Program Specialist who supports community outreach and program activities.

Staﬀ recommends that the City Council approve the execution of the 2026-27 AmeriCorps grant documents, accept the grant funds, and approve the City's cash match for the 2026-27 Ontario Promise Corps program year.
179
Department: Public Works
Prepared By: Adrian Escamilla
Staff Member Presenting: Tito Haes, Executive
Director Public Works
Reviewed By: Rene Guerrero, Jacqueline Leon
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 13
SUBJECT:

A CHANGE ORDER TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH K.C. RESTORATION CO., INC. FOR THE EMMONS BUILDING (GRANADA THEATER) HISTORIC

REHABILITATION PROJECT

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
September 15, 2026
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council take the following actions:

A
.

Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Change Order No. 2 to Construction Contract No. D&C25-003 with K.C. Restoration CO., Inc., of Gardena, California, for the Emmons Building (Granada Theater) Historic Rehabilitation Project Phase 1 in the amount of $17,667, utilizing $9,332 in available project contingency and increasing the contract amount by $8,335, for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $1,312,825; and B
.

Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all documents required for the completion of the project including, but not limited to, contracts, agreements, assessments, easements, reduction of retention accounts, and ﬁling a notice of completion at the conclusion of all construction-related activities.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Invest in the City's Infrastructure (Water, Streets, Sewers, Parks, Storm Drains and Public Facilities)
FISCAL IMPACT:

The recommended Change Order No. 2 to the Construction Contract with K.C.

Restoration CO., Inc., is in the amount of $17,667. The project has $9,332 available in existing contingency funds, resulting in an additional funding need of $8,335, for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $1,312,825. The Fiscal Year 2026-27 Adopted Budget includes appropriations in the Capital Projects - Measure Q Fund for the Emmons Building (Granada Theater) Historic Rehabilitation Project Phase 1.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

On January 20, 2026, the City Council approved a Construction Contract with K.C. Restoration Co., Inc. for Phase 1 of the Emmons Building (Granada Theater) Historic Rehabilitation Project. Phase 1 includes exterior improvements consisting of removal of the existing coating, lead mitigation, painting, window restoration, and restoration of the marquee sign. 180
Since construction began, unforeseen conditions associated with the building’s age and historic character have been identiﬁed, resulting in additional work necessary to safely and properly complete the project. During removal of the existing coating from the building’s decorative concrete elements, Staﬀ and the contractor discovered spalling, cracking, deterioration, and separation of several decorative exterior elements surrounding the second and third ﬂoors. This is particularly evident in the large decorative pendant located above the restored marquee sign.

Change Order No. 2 provides for additional work that was not included in the original contract but is necessary to address these unforeseen conditions. The additional scope includes repairing cracks and preparing several smaller decorative elements and one large decorative pendant for 3-D scanning and precast mold fabrication. Once the scanning and mold fabrication are completed, the deteriorated decorative elements will be removed due to their existing condition and inadequate attachment to the building. The aﬀected elements will be electronically documented and cataloged for potential future restoration as part of Phase 2 of the project, subject to available funding.

The total cost of the additional work is $17,667. Of this amount, $9,332 will be funded through the remaining project contingency, resulting in an additional contract authorization of $8,335 for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $1,312,825. Staﬀ recommends approving Change Order No. 2 to Construction Contract No. D&C25-003 with K.C. Restoration Co., Inc. to address the unforeseen conditions and ensure completion of the Phase 1 rehabilitation work in accordance with project requirements. Completion of Phase 1 is scheduled for November 2026. 181
PCO #7
To: City of Ontario July 8, 2026
303 E B St
Ontario, CA 91764
Attn: Adrian Escamilla
Granada Theater - PCO #7 - Pre-cast demo, mold making, and 3-D scanning On Site Labor Mhrs Rate Labor $
Fabricate mold PCM-1 at PC-1 6 $ 80.69 484.14 $ Demo and skim of PC-3 4 $ 80.69 322.76 $
Demo and skim of PC-6 4 $ 80.69 322.76 $
Fabricate mold PCM-7 at PC-7 6 $ 80.69 484.14 $ Fabricate mold PCM-8 at PC-8 6 $ 80.69 484.14 $ Demo and skim of PC-15 4 $ 80.69 322.76 $
Demo and skim of PC-16 4 $ 80.69 322.76 $
Demo and skim of PC-23 4 $ 80.69 322.76 $
Fabricate mold PCM-24 at PC-24 16 $ 80.69 1,2 91.04 $ Demo and skim of PC-24
(Big 3-panel friezes)
24 $ 80.69 1,936.56 $
Fabricate mold PCM-25 at PC-25 6 $ 80.69 484. 14 $ Fabricate mold PCM-29 at PC-29 6 $ 80.69 484. 14 $ Demo and skim of PC-31 4 $ 80.69 322.76 $
Off Site Labor Mhrs Rate Total Cost
Materials Qty Unit Cost Material $
Mold-making kit 6 $ 552.46 3,314.76 $
Subcontractors Cost
AQYER - 3-D Scanning
(Single visit, pieces noted, files furnished
to Owner)
$ 4,200.00
Other Costs Cost
Subtotal Labor, Materials, Subcontractors $ 15,099.62 OH&P @ 15% $ 2,264.94 Bond @ 2% $ 301.99 Total Cost 17,666.56 $
See extensive write-up attached.
1514 W 130th St, Gardena, CA 90249 (310) 280-059 7 CA CL # 637240 182 1 2
3 4
5 GRANADA THEATER

PRECAST NUMBERS
183
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 GRANADA THEATER

PRECAST NUMBERS
184
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31

GRANADA THEATER

PRECAST NUMBERS
185

BB&K (2024) 1 CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDER
46700.00100\40935197.1

CITY OF ONTARIO

CHANGE ORDER

Project: D&C25 -003 Emmons Bldg (Granada Theater
Project Phase 1

Contract Date: 3/18/26

Change Order Number: 2

Change Order Date: 8/26/26

To: K.C. Restoration CO., Inc.
1514 W 130th St
Gardena, CA 90249
Attention: Steve Lehne, President

THIS CHANGE ORDER FORM SHALL BE USED FOR ALL CHANGE ORDER S ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK.

NO ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS FORM SHALL BE ALLOWED, EXCEPT WITH PERMISSION OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO.

The Contract is changed as follows:

PCO # 7 Pre-cast demo, mold making and 3-D Scanning $17,666.56

Contractor agrees to furnish all labor, materials, equipment and services to perform the Work, modified as described herein, in accordance with the Contract Documents as revised by this Change Order.

NOT VALID UNTIL SIGNED BY OWNER

In consideration of the change(s) described above, the Contract Price is adjusted as follows:

The original Contract Price was $____1,087,075.00______ Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $____208,082.53______ The Contract Price prior to this Change Order was $____1,295,157.53______ The Contract Price will be changed by this Change Order in the amount of $__ __17,666.56_______ The new Contract Price including this Change Order will be $____1,312,824.09_________

PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR

DEBRA PORADA

MAYOR PRO TEM

ALAN D. WAPNER
JIM W. BOWMAN

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK

JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
186

BB&K (2024) 2 CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDER
46700.00100\40935197.1

In consideration of the change(s) described above, the Contract Time is adjusted as follows:

The Contract Time will be: increased decreased unchanged by _0 Days The Contract Time prior to this Change Order was _240_ _ Days The new Contract Time including this Change Order will be _240___ Days

Attachments: PCO #07
Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated herein as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising from this Change Order . The adjustments to the Contract Price and Contract Time in this Change Order constitutes the entire compensation and/or adjustment thereto due to Contractor , including direct, indirect, consequential, and overhead (field and home office) costs, due to Contractor arising out of or related to the c hange in the Work covered by this Change Order . By signing this Change Order, Contractor agrees to accept the amount of the adjustment to the Contract Price, and the adjustment of the Contract Time, as payment in full for all costs, including direct, indirect, consequential, and overhead (field and home office) costs, related to the change in the Work covered by this Change Order.

Accepted:

(Signature) Steve Lehne, President Date

Approved:

(Signature) Tito Haes, Executive Director Public Works Date

Approved:

(Signature) Scott Ochoa, City Manager Date

187
Department: Utilities
Prepared By: Thomas Palmieri
Staff Member Presenting: Scott Burton, Utilities
General Manager
Reviewed By: Dennice Raygoza, Courtney
Jones, Michael Sigsbee
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 14
SUBJECT:

AMENDMENTS TO THE DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH ARDURRA GROUP, INC., AND FEHR & PEERS, INC., AMENDMENTS TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MOOTE COMPANIES, LLC., AND A DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WESTLAND GROUP, INC., FOR THE

ONTARIO RANCH ROAD AND GROVE AVENUE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT AND A RESOLUTION MAKING A DECLARATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE

TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
September 15, 2026
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council take the following actions:

A
.

Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 6 to the Design Services Agreement with Ardurra Group, Inc. (Ardurra), of Newport Beach, California, to provide on-call design services for the Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue Corridor Improvement Project in the amount of $7,455,068 for a new total revised not-to-exceed amount of $13,231,839, and a term of June 4, 2024 to June 4, 2029.

B
.

Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Design Services Agreement with Fehr & Peers, Inc. (Fehr & Peers), of Irvine, California, to provide on-call transportation planning and traﬃc engineering design services for the Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue Corridor Improvement Project in the amount of $22,000 for a new total revised not-to-exceed amount of $686,211, and a term of April 2, 2024 to April 2, 2027.

C
.

Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates, Inc. (Harris and Associates), of Concord, California, to provide professional engineering plan check services for the Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue Corridor Improvement Project in the amount of $2,394,972 for a new total revised not-to-exceed amount of $5,394,972, and a term of July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2028.

D
.

Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Moote Companies, LLC. (Moote), of Irvine, California, to provide on- call project management services for the Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue Corridor Improvement Project in the amount of $10,359,875 for a new total revised not-to-exceed amount of $10,459,875, and a term of April 4, 2023 to March 31, 2028. 188
E
.

Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Design Services Agreement with Westland Group, Inc. (Westland), of Rancho Cucamonga, California, to provide design services for the Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue Corridor Improvement Project for a total not- to-exceed amount of $7,540,552, and a term of September 15, 2026 to August 31, 2031.

F
.

Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents required for the completion of the project which may include, but are not limited to, agreements, assessments, easements, reduction of retention accounts, contract amendments within the authorization limits, and submitting required documents with appropriate agencies.

G
.

Consider and adopt a Resolution making a declaration of intent to issue tax-exempt obligations.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy Invest in the City's Infrastructure (Water, Streets, Sewers, Parks, Storm Drains and Public Facilities)
Ensure the Development of a Well Planned, Balanced, and Self-Sustaining Community in Ontario Ranch
FISCAL IMPACT:

The Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue Corridor Improvement Project (Project) consists of various improvements along Ontario Ranch Road from Euclid Avenue to Archibald Avenue and Grove Avenue from Riverside Drive to Eucalyptus Avenue (ORR and Grove Corridors). These improvements will include, but not be limited to, street improvements, undergrounding and relocation of existing utilities, and new storm drain, sewer, water, recycled water, and ﬁber optic improvements (Infrastructure Improvements).

Approval of the proposed amendments to the Design Services Agreements and Professional Services Agreements with Ardurra, Fehr & Peers, Harris & Associates, and Moote and approval of the Professional Services Agreement with Westland amounts to a total of $27,772,467.

Project appropriations are required for this project and will be updated, as necessary, to reﬂect current and planned expenses from Capital Projects – Measure Q Fund, Water Capital Fund, Sewer Capital Fund, Ontario Ranch Development Impact Fees Fund, Storm Drain Fund, Streets Fund, and Fiber Optic Fund. If approved, additional appropriations will be included in future quarterly budget updates to City Council for approval as needed. Additionally, The City intends to ﬁnance the acquisition, construction, and installation of certain public capital improvements with the proceeds of the sale of tax-exempt obligations. Staﬀ recommends approval of a Reimbursement Resolution, which permits the City to reimburse itself for certain costs incurred prior to the issuance of bonds, as allowed under the Internal Revenue Code.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

Ontario Ranch Road from Euclid Avenue to Archibald Avenue and Grove Avenue from Riverside Drive to Eucalyptus Avenue are identiﬁed in The Ontario Plan (TOP) as two of the principal arterial roads central to Ontario Ranch West (see Exhibit A). The proposed street and infrastructure improvement projects along these two corridors will provide the essential 189
backbone infrastructure to support continued development in the western half of Ontario Ranch and provide critical access to the future Fire Station 11/Public Safety Center.

The Project will evaluate the existing right-of-way, include coordination with public and private agencies and land owners, and complete the design of the necessary street, transportation, median, bridge, storm drain, sewer, water, recycle water, ﬁber optic, and other improvements along Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue as speciﬁed in the TOP and various facilities Master Plans.

The scope of work includes preparation of a Preliminary Design Report, utility research and potholing, geotechnical investigations, permitting, right-of-way assessment, property appraisal and acquisition, construction and permanent easement dedications, preparation of plans and speciﬁcations, and bid phase support services. Environmental review will be conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

Between May and June 2026, Staﬀ from Community Development, Public Works, and the Ontario Municipal Utilities Company reviewed and evaluated the performance of several qualiﬁed design consultants with active or recent project experience within the immediate area of the corridors and have demonstrated a proven track record to deliver successful projects. Qualiﬁed consultants include Ardurra for the Grove Avenue design package, Westland for the Ontario Ranch Road design package, and Harris & Associates for plan check services, Moote for project management services, and Fehr & Peers for traffic analysis for both corridors.

On April 4, 2023, the City Council awarded On-Call Professional Services Agreements to Moote and four other consultants for project management services. Moote was selected for this task based on the ﬁrm’s extensive knowledge of Ontario Ranch and the City of Ontario, as demonstrated through its prior work managing and coordinating the design and construction of over $300 million of Ontario Ranch backbone infrastructure through development projects such as the Merrill Commerce Center. This familiarity with the City’s land development processes, planning objectives, and development patterns in Ontario Ranch will support the eﬃcient and eﬀective completion of the requested services.

On April 2, 2024, the City Council awarded On-Call Transportation Planning and Traﬃc Engineering Design Services Agreements to Fehr & Peers and ﬁve other consultants for transportation planning and traﬃc engineering design services. Fehr & Peers was selected for this task based on the ﬁrm's extensive knowledge of Ontario Ranch and the City of Ontario, as demonstrated through its prior work preparing traﬃc studies for the Ontario Sports Empire, the TOP 2050 Update, the Downtown Euclid Corridor, and multiple Speciﬁc Plans within the Ontario Ranch area. This familiarity with the City's transportation network, planning objectives, and development patterns will support the efficient and effective completion of the requested services.

On June 4, 2024, the City Council awarded On-Call Design Services Agreements to Ardurra and four other consultants for design services. Ardurra was selected for this task because of the ﬁrm’s extensive knowledge of Ontario Ranch and the City of Ontario, and through its prior work preparing utility infrastructure packages for Ontario Ranch Phase 2 water improvements, which constructed a 30” water main in Grove from Chino Avenue to Eucalyptus Avenue, and for Sports Empire along Riverside Drive. Additionally, Ardurra is currently working on the Western Trunk Sewer (WTS) project, which will use the Grove Avenue corridor as the alignment for the WTS. This familiarity with the City’s design and planning objectives along Grove Ave will support the eﬃcient and eﬀective 190
completion of the requested services.

On July 1, 2025, the City Council awarded On-Call Engineering Plan Check Professional Services Agreements to Harris & Associates and one other consultant for professional engineering plan check services. Harris & Associates was selected for this task based on the ﬁrm's extensive knowledge of Ontario Ranch and the City of Ontario, as demonstrated through its prior work preparing accelerated and comprehensive plan check review for the City. This familiarity with the City's plan check processes and objectives, and land development patterns will support the eﬃcient and effective completion of the requested services.

For the Ontario Ranch Road Corridor, Staﬀ recommends proceeding with a non-competitive Design Services Agreement with Westland. Westland has already completed the utility research, potholing, and potable water and storm drain design for approximately 40% (1.25 miles) of the proposed 3.25- mile Ontario Ranch Road corridor under the Center-Park Speciﬁc Plan. Retaining Westland as the engineer of record will prevent duplication of design eﬀorts, maintain consistency in technical assumptions, and expedite project delivery by up to one year based on the preliminary engineering already completed while ensuring eﬃcient use of City resources and supporting timely project advancement. Furthermore, Westland has a proven history of delivering complex infrastructure projects within the City of Ontario through large-scale oﬀ-site improvement initiatives, including engineering design, surveying, and construction support for corridor-wide upgrades along key avenues such as Merrill Avenue, Eucalyptus Avenue, Grove Avenue, and Euclid Avenue. Their portfolio encompasses more than 100,000 linear feet of new utility systems and features comprehensive drainage analyses, utility enhancements, traﬃc signal designs, and roadway widening for Ontario projects such as Merrill Commerce Center Speciﬁc Plan, Ontario Ranch Business Park Speciﬁc Plan, West Ontario Commerce Center Speciﬁc Plan, Euclid Mixed Use Speciﬁc Plan, and State Street/Bon View Avenue Improvements. These projects required coordination with local agencies, utility companies, Caltrans, and private developers, as well as the preparation of detailed construction documents, right-of-way analyses, and record drawings. Westland’s collaborative approach and technical expertise have been instrumental in the successful planning, permitting, and construction of critical public infrastructure, supporting Ontario’s ongoing growth and development.

Additionally, Westland will provide non-destructive utility locating services for both Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue corridors. Early utility veriﬁcation is essential to ensure a high-quality and timely design. Westland’s familiarity with City standards and their specialized team increase the likelihood of efficient and successful project delivery.

Between June and August 2026, Staﬀ and the Consultants in a good faith eﬀort navigated the complexities of this Project to develop a scope of services for the Consultants as a baseline to develop and submit their specific proposals for their section of the project.

Staﬀ has reviewed the proposals and recommends Ardurra for the Grove Avenue design package, Fehr & Peers for traﬃc analysis, Harris & Associates for plan check services, Moote for project management services and Westland for the Ontario Ranch Road design package. These vendors have been selected based upon their understanding of the project scope, the City's needs, criteria speciﬁed in the scope of services, technical approach, relevant experience, qualiﬁcations of the proposed project team, fee proposal, and references.
191
192

193

BB&K (2024) 1 AMENDMENT TO NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414

PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR

DEBRA PORADA

MAYOR PRO TEM

ALAN D. WAPNER
JIM W. BOWMAN

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK

JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER

AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND
ARDURRA GROUP, INC.

1. Parties and Date.

This Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement (as defined herein) is made and entered as of _____________________, by and between the City of Ontario (“City”) and Ardurra Group, Inc., a CORPORATION (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. Recitals.

2.1 Agreement. The City and Consultant have entered into an agreement entitled “Design Services Agreement” dated June 4, 2024 (“Agreement”).

2.2 Amendment Purpose. The City and Consultant desire to amend the Agreement to revise the scope of services for the Grove Ave Corridor Improvement project, increase the compensation by Seven million four hundred fifty-five thousand sixty-eight dollars ($7,455,068), for a total-not-to-exceed compensation of Thirteen million two hundred thirty-one thousand eight hundred thirty-nine dollars ($13,231,839). This increase in compensation is to accommodate the additional scope of work listed in the attached Consultants’ Proposal for the Grove Avenue Corridor Improvement Project dated July 24, 2026. Parties have heretofore entered into that Amendment No. 1 dated July 16, 2024, Amendment No. 2 dated November 19, 2024, Amendment No. 3 dated October 7, 2025, Amendment No. 4 dated April 7, 2026, and Amendment No. 5 dated June 2, 2026.

2.3 Amendment Authority. This Amendment No. 6 is authorized pursuant to Section 3 of the Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Amendment.

194
BB&K (2024) 2 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414

Section 3.1.1 Scope of Services of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

3.1.1 Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional architectural and related services necessary for the full and adequate completion of the Project consistent with the provisions of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Services”). The Services are more particularly described throughout this Agreement, including Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, any exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules, and regulations. All Services performed by Consultant shall be subject to the sole and discretionary approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Additionally, Consultant shall comply with all Federal requirements applicable to the Services as set forth in Exhibit “A”.

Section 3.10.1, Consultant’s Compensation for Basic Services of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

3.10.1 Consultant’s Compensation for Basic Services. City shall pay to Consultant, for the performance of all Services rendered under this Agreement, the total not to exceed amount of Thirteen million two hundred thirty-one thousand eight hundred thirty-nine dollars ($13,231,839). (“Total Compensation”). This Total Compensation amount shall be based upon, and may be adjusted according to, the fee schedule and related terms and conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference. The Total Compensation, as may be adjusted upon mutual agreement, shall constitute complete and adequate payment for Services under this Agreement.

Exhibit “A” - SCOPE OF SERVICES is hereby amended to add Attachment A which is hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All other previously added or deleted scope of services are retained in their entirety.

Exhibit “B” – SCHEDULE OF SERVICES is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Attachment B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 6, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 6. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 6, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 6.

3.3 Adequate Consideration. The Parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 6.

3.4 Severability. If any portion of this Amendment No. 6 is declared invalid, illegal, or 195
BB&K (2024) 3 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414

otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

196
BB&K (2024) 4 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE DESIGN SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO
AND ARDURRA GROUP, INC.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment No. 6 as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ONTARIO ARDURRA GROUP, INC.

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]

Approved By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
Approved as to Form:

_____________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

Attested By:

City Clerk

197
BB&K (2024) 5 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
Attachment A
Exhibit “A” – SCOPE OF SERVICES
198
3737 Birch Street, Suite 250 | Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.529.2190 | www.ardurra.com A
ugust 10, 2026
Omar Gonzalez, CIP Manager
OMUC
1333 S. Bon View Avenue
Ontario, CA 91761
SUBJECT: Proposal for Engineering Services for Ontario Ranch West
Grove Avenue Improvements
Dear Mr. Gonzalez:

T
hank you for the privilege to work with the City on this exciting, fast-tracked project. For your review and consideration, we prepared a scope, estimated design fee, and design schedule for the project. The table below shows a rough order of magnitude (ROM) for the Construction Value for the full-width improvements along Grove Avenue.

Construction Value Improvement
$22,300,000 Street and Drainage Improvements
$5,000,000 Traffic/Fiber Broadband Improvements
$25,000,000 Wet Utilities Improvements
$8,000,000 Landscape Improvements
$4,500,000 OH to UG SCE Conversion
$9,000,000(1) OH to OH SCE Transmission Relocation
$73.8 million Opinion of Probable Construction Value
(1) Ardurra will seek to utilize the City’s one time re location clause for SCE to pay the relocation O
ur fee reflects our On-Call Services Agreement 2024 Billing Rates escalated to 2027. Per our on-call contract terms, we will update our billing rates annually by 3%. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information at 661.748.3893 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Dolores Salgado, PE
Project Director
Enclosures:

Exhibit “A” Scope of Work (written scope, tabulated scope, scope exhibit) Exhibit “B” Fee Schedule
Exhibit "C” Design Schedule
199
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 2 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com Exhibit “A” - Scope of Work
Ontario Ranch West
Engineering Services for Grove Avenue Improvements

Ardurra will create a Sharepoint folder to facilitate the timely coordination and completion of this project.

Ardurra also recommends utilizing Bluebeam sessions to collaborate with the City during the Citywide Plan Check. This will be discussed with the City Project Manager at the project kick-off meeting.

Task 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

Project Management & Administration, Progress Reporting, Invoicing Progress Reporting: Ardurra shall prepare progress reports with monthly invoices. Ardurra shall prepare, submit, and maintain a current, detailed design sch edule for the duration of the project using Microso ft Project. The schedule shall be updated regularly an d submitted to the City. In addition, Ardurra shall provide bi-weekly emails to the City’s PM to report progress, potential issues and resolutions.

Bi-Weekly Progress Meetings
Bi-Weekly Progress Meetings: Ardurra shall attend p rogress and coordination meetings with the City throughout the project via TEAMS or other virtual platform. For purposes of this proposal, we assumed one-hour, bi-weekly meetings at a project duration of 14-months (30-meetings total). Ardurra shall prepare meeting minutes to document key decisions and distribute copies to attendees for review.

Project Decision/Risk Management Log
Ardurra will track major decisions and risk managem ent concerns for the purpose of seamlessly coordinating with the multidisciplinary teams, multiple City Departments, multiple City’s consultants, and managing the scope of work to meet the City’s expec tations, with the expedited project schedule. The Log will be created using Microsoft Excel and will be shared using Sharepoint to allow multiple participants to have the most current version at all times.

Stakeholder Coordination
Ardurra will schedule stakeholder meetings throughout the duration of the project. This scope assumes one meeting per milestone submittal, total of ten (10) meetings, during preliminary and final design phase of the project. The following stakeholders were identified:

• Southern California Edison
• Inland Empire Utilities Agency
• San Bernardino County Flood Control District
• Southern California Gas Company
• Spectrum/Charter
• Private Property Owners

Coordination Meetings with other City Consultants
This scope assumes a total of ten (10) meetings for City Consultants. Due to the expedited project schedule, this scope includes ongoing meetings, phone discussions, coordination efforts via email and in the field with various other consultants as identified herein:
200
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 3 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com • Engineer of Record for Ontario Ranch Road (Westlands) • Citywide planchecker (Harris and Associates)
• Program Manager (TBD)
• Traffic Engineers (Fehr and Peers)

Task 2 – DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW

Data Collection and Review
Ardurra assumes the City will provide available rec ord drawings and relevant reports within the Projec t limits. Ardurra will review available records and perform field investigations to determine the location of existing facilities for preparation of a complete a nd accurate set of project contract documents. Exis ting facilities shall include, but not be limited to, de veloper plans, streets and drainage plans, traffic signal plans, wet and dry utilities, Master Plans, Westlan ds design drawings for Ontario Ranch Road, City hydraulic models, County facilities including Grove Avenue Drain and drainage basins, and other relevant City records. IEUA’s master plans and other relevant reports and future improvements.

Ardurra assumes the City will provide City’s Utilit y Atlas Map for Sewer Mains, Domestic Water Mains, Recycled Water and Storm drains in electronic forma t. Collected as-built information will be compiled , reviewed, and catalogued and provided to the City during milestone submittals.

Utility Research and Coordination
Ardurra will establish contact with existing utility companies in the project Vicinity. Existing utilities shall include, but are not limited to, water, recycled wa ter, sewer, storm drain, gas, electric, fuel lines, telephone, cable, and fiber optic cables. Ardurra w ill prepare and submit utility information requests to utility owners with facilities in the project vicin ity. Ardurra shall provide copies of requests sent to all affected parties to the City for their records. Ardurra will prepare and submit utility verification requests along with plan sets to utility owners with facilit ies in the project vicinity at each milestone. Ardu rra will prepare and submit utility conflict notices to util ity owners with facilities impacted by the proposed project and provide the City will correspondence between Ardurra and each utility company.

Utility Potholing
Following a desktop investigation of the existing utilities in the project area, Ardurra will prepare a specific Utility Pothole Plan. Areas of special concern will be the interface locations with existing major uti lities including water, sewer, storm water, electrical power, and instrumentation. For the purpose of providing a fee for this scope, it was assumed that up to fifty (50 potholes) will be performed along Grove Avenue.

BESS will perform utility potholes using air-vacuum excavation and prepare a Utility Pothole Report. BESS will obtain required permits to perform work within the project area. This scope includes repairing th e potholes by filling the hole with slurry cement and patching per the City’s requirements. This scope includes preparation of traffic control plans for t he potholing signed by a CA Registered Traffic Engineer.

This scope assumes no hot patch asphalt mix.

201
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 4 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com Review Westlands GPR and Implement Findings
Ardurra will review the Ground Penetrating Radar re ports provided by Westlands and perform field investigations to refine the location of existing u tilities in the project vicinity. Ardurra will per form field investigations after each milestone submittal to ve rify utility mapping, potential conflicts, and iden tify potential utility pothole locations. Ardurra colle cted utility mapping and potholing data as part of the UT1050 project and will apply that information duri ng preliminary design. The data will be verified a nd updated accordingly.

Surveying and Mapping
O’Day Consultants will provide the following servic es for the Grove Avenue alignment, from Riverside Drive to Eucalyptus Avenue, approximately 2 miles:
• Establish horizontal and vertical control per NAD 8 3 Zone 5, and NGVD 29 or as otherwise indicated by client
• Set and tie in 10 aerial panels
• Prepare 250-foot-wide orthophoto at 0.25-foot ground sample distance • Survey monuments to determine street right of way between Riverside Drive and Chino Avenue • Prepare 250-foot-wide aerial topo at 40-scale with one-foot contour interval

Supplemental field survey:
• All surface utilities or structures, including valve covers, water boxes, utility risers, etc. • Existing signs, power poles, and guy wires
• Locations of trees 4 inches in diameter or greater
• Rim elevations and invert depths of sewer and storm drain manholes and catch basins (locked manholes and manholes with oversized lids will need to be opened by City or utility owner) • Utility markings by USA or Westlands GPR within project limits • Detailed field topo at cross streets 100 feet on each side of Grove Avenue

Note: There is significant overlap between the surv eying and mapping for this Project and the UT1096 Western Trunk Sewer (WTS) alignment. This scope ass umes the City selects Grove Avenue as the WTS alignment, therefore the surveying and mapping of t he segment of Grove Ave between Chino Ave and Eucalyptus Ave is included in the WTS project. Our scope and fee includes an additional 50-foot wide strip beyond the City’s ultimate ROW to design the transitions to existing. Our assumption is that the 250- foot wide strip will be flown at the same time.

Geotechnical Investigation
Converse Consultants will perform the geotechnical investigations and provide project recommendations for the anticipated deep sewer manholes, retaining walls, pavement design, trenchless crossings, trenching for utilities, unsuitable or unstable soi l removal and import, and other project specific de sign recommendations. This scope includes drilling six (6) borings 25-feet deep, six (6) borings 35-feet d eep, and two (2) borings 40-feet deep for a total of 14 borings.

202
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 5 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com The borings will be backfilled with soil/cement mix and the pavement section will be replaced with Aquaphalt. Aquaphalt is a high-performance, eco-fri endly, water-activated repair material designed for permanent fixes on asphalt and concrete surface, such as potholes, driveways, and utility cuts.

This scope includes a draft and final geotechnical report and obtaining permits for field work.

TASK 3 – RIGHT OF WAY SERVICES

O’Day Consultants will provide exhibits showing the existing City right of way (ROW) and the ultimate ROW. The property owners will be tabulated by asse ssor’s parcel numbers, property owner’s name and contact information, and required ROW for ultimate street improvements. Clark Land Solutions will then prepare a ROW assessment to provide the City with the information necessary to identify the ROW needs and potential costs. This scope assumes thirty-two (31) parcels, with approximately 23 larger parcels considering contiguity and unity of highest and best use (HBU). This is inclusive of permanent right of way and temporary construction easements. This scope a ssumes that Clark Land Solutions will coordinate with the City’s real estate department and once the City’s PM authorizes Ardurra to oroceed with acquisition, this scope includes, contacting the pr ivate property owners, obtaining market value appraisals, negotiating with private property owner s, and closing the sale. This scope assumes a 45-d ay negotiation period.

Plat and Legal Documents (31 parcels)
Prepare plat and legal descriptions for 31 parcels, these can be either temporary construction easements, or street dedications per the City of Ontario’s sta ndards, including lot closure calculations, support ing maps, preliminary title reports, and obtaining appr ovals through City-wide plancheck processes and procedures.

TASK 4 – PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND 30% PLANS

Ardurra will prepare a series of Technical Memorandums (TM) to address the topics below. Each TM will conclude with a summary of design recommendations, City-approved variances and deviations from standards, and memorialize technical decisions that may be needed during future phases of the project or during City-wide plan checking processes.

The preliminary design phase will establish the eng ineering basis for the interim and build-out of Gro ve Avenue per the City’s Streets Master Plans for stre ets, water, sewer, recycled water, storm drains, an d general plan.

• Tech Memo - Construction Cost Analysis for Last Lane Improvements • Tech Memo - Existing Conditions Constraints
• Tech Memo - Design Criteria
• Tech Memo - Environmental Clearance (CEQA IS/MND)
• Tech Memo - Right of Way Assessment
• Tech Memo - Utility Impacts
• Tech Memo - Permit Workplan
• Tech Memo - Hydraulic Analysis (Water, Sewer, Recycled Water) 203
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 6 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com • Tech Memo - Hydraulic Analysis (Storm Drains)
• Tech Memo - Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
• Tech Memo - Opinion of Construction Schedule

Environmental CEQA Clearance
As noted in the City’s scope of work, proposed impr ovements are understood to be constructed in accordance with The Ontario Plan, and CEQA complian ce is anticipated to be addressed either via a Categorical Exemption (CE) or Mitigated Negative De claration (MND). Ardurra will prepare supporting environmental documentation for the City’s consider ation, including a CEQA-compliant project description, evaluation of the exceptions to catego rical exemptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2, supporting biological, cultural, tribal cu ltural, paleontological, and hazardous materials documentation, and an Environmental Commitments Mem orandum to identify measures to be incorporated into the project design and construction documents, as applicable.

In support of that documentation, Ardurra will eval uate the project against the list of exceptions, as applicable and outlined in Section 15300.2 of the C EQA Guidelines, along with supporting technical memoranda for biological resources and cultural res ources, and a hazards database search. Ardurra will draft a CEQA-compliant project description that identifies the project’s physical components, summarizes existing and surrounding land uses, and describes the construction and operational characteristics of the project. Construction details will include equipmen t, duration of various activities, and any related demolition, grading, and construction phases. A regional location and local vicinity map will be prepared.

ELMT, will prepare a Biological Resources Report th at encompasses a literature review, database searches, wetlands/jurisdictional waters review, an d field investigation including documentation of th e presence/absence of special-status resources such a s western burrowing owl and Delhi Sands flower- loving fly. The report will document observed plant /wildlife species and jurisdictional drainage featu res and will include a brief analysis of the project’s potential to impact biological resources, suggestio ns for further studies and focused surveys that may be needed prior to development, mitigation measures, and permit requirements, if needed. The final report will be sufficient to satisfy CEQA requirements.

BCR, will prepare a Cultural Resources Assessment t hat includes a records search at the South-Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at CSU Fullerton . The results will be summarized to characterize th e status and extent of previous cultural resource studies completed in the project area (including a one-mile radius), and to help predict resources expected within the project alignment. Additional land use history research will be performed through local repositori es (including the Ontario Library and San Bernardin o County Assessor records. BCR field staff will perfo rm a pedestrian cultural resources survey of the accessible project alignment.

Based on review of the draft project description, we anticipate analysis of a 124-foot right of way centered on the existing Grove Avenue from Riverside Drive o n the north to Eucalyptus Avenue on the south (approximately 2.0 miles). A preliminary review of aerial photographs from 1977 and 1980 have shown that six historic-period (i.e. 45+ years old) resou rces are located within the proposed impact area.

California Register of Historical Resources (Califo rnia Register) eligibility evaluations are necessar y to determine significance under CEQA. Preliminary information from the City of Ontario indicates that three of these resources have previously been evaluated f or California Register listing eligibility/CEQA significance. As such, these three resources will n ot require further consideration under this scope o f work. The remaining three will require eligibility evaluation. Existing and proposed evaluations will be 204
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 7 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com used to recommend historic significance through the City’s tier system, based on The Ontario Plan 2050 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program . For the purposes of this proposal, a maximum of s ix historic-period resources will be photographed and documented (including updates for three previously recorded resources and intensive coverage for the remaining three).

Results from the activities described above will be summarized in a Cultural Resources Report. The report will include a project description, cultural setting, methods, results, California Register and City eligibility evaluations, and recommendations sections. Relevant maps and photographs will also be included.

Department of Park and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms w ill be completed for a maximum of six historic- period cultural resources.

A paleontological overview for the project will be initiated with the Western Science Museum with results included in an appendix to the Cultural Resources R eport. Tribal cultural resources will be assessed b y contacting the Native American Heritage Commission to request a Sacred Lands File (SLF) Search. The results of the SLF will be appended to the Report. AB 52 Native American consultation outreach letters will be drafted for the City to send to Native Amer ican entities that have requested participation. Th e potential for impacts to buried cultural resources is assumed to be negative.

Technical information from online research and fiel d surveys, along with Best Management Practices (BMPs) incorporated into an environmental complianc e memorandum, which will document the CEQA NOE or MND finding. The Draft CEQA documentation will be submitted to the City review and comment.

Hazardous Materials Technical Memorandum
Ardurra will prepare a Hazardous Materials Technical Memorandum to support the CEQA evaluation and inform project design and construction planning. Th e memorandum will include a desktop review of readily available federal, state, and local environ mental records and databases for the project corrid or and surrounding area, including, as applicable, DTS C EnviroStor, State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker, Cortese-listed sites, leaking undergrou nd storage tank records, cleanup sites, hazardous waste facilities, and other reasonably available regulatory sources.

The memorandum will summarize known or potential ha zardous materials concerns within or near the project limits that could affect excavation, utilit y relocation, potholing, geotechnical investigation , soil management, dewatering, worker health and safety, or construction sequencing. The review will focus on identifying recognized environmental constraints relevant to the proposed roadway, drainage, wet utility, dry utility, utility undergrounding, and right-of-way improvements.

The memorandum will provide recommendations for con struction-phase avoidance, minimization, and management measures, if warranted, such as soil obs ervation protocols, procedures for encountering stained or odorous soil, suspect debris, underground storage tanks, contaminated groundwater, or other indications of contamination, and recommendations f or additional investigation if higher-risk areas ar e identified. The memorandum will also identify hazardous materials-related commitments that should be incorporated into the environmental compliance memo randum and, where appropriate, the project specifications or contractor requirements.

205
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 8 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com Environmental Compliance Memorandum and Mitigation Plan Ardurra will prepare an environmental compliance memorandum and mitigation plan (if required) and to identify, consolidate, and track environmental commitments, avoidance and minimization measures, best management practices, and mitigation measures developed through the CEQA evaluation and supporting technical studies. The memorandum will compile measures identified in the Biological Resources Report, Cultural Resources Assessment, paleontological over view, tribal cultural resources review, hazardous materials review, and other applicable environmental analyses prepared for the project.

The memorandum will identify the responsible party, timing of implementation, applicable project phase, and method of incorporation into the project plans, specifications, estimates, and/or contractor requirements, as appropriate. Measures may include, but are not limited to, biological resource protection measures, cultural and tribal cultural r esource inadvertent discovery procedures, paleontological resource procedures, hazardous mate rials handling protocols, stormwater and erosion control BMPs, construction-related avoidance measures, and permit-related conditions, if applicable.

Ardurra will coordinate with the civil design team to identify environmental commitments that should be incorporated into the PS&E package, including general notes, special provisions, plan notes, bid items, or other contract-document mechanisms. The environment al compliance memorandum will be submitted to the City for one round of review and comment. Revisions will be incorporated into a final memorandum for use by the City and design team during final design, bidding, and construction coordination.

Assumptions
• The City will serve as CEQA lead agency and will be responsible for making the final CEQA determination and filing the Notice of Exemption; t herefore, the City will assume CEQA lead agency responsibility, final CEQA determination, an d filing of the Notice of Exemption will be performed by the City, and provided by Ardurra.
• The project will not require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). • Ardurra’s environmental scope is limited to prepara tion of supporting CEQA documentation, technical studies, hazardous materials desktop review, environmental commitments tracking, and coordination with the design team for incorporation of applicable environmental commitments into the project plans and specifications.
• This scope does not include a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Phase II subsurface investigation, soil or groundwater sampling, hazard ous building materials survey, waste characterization, remediation design, or agency cas e closure support. If the desktop review identifies conditions that warrant additional inves tigation or specialized hazardous materials services, Ardurra will notify the City and prepare a proposal for the additional scope work upon request.
• The Draft CEQA documentation will be submitted to t he City for one round of review and comment. Revisions will be incorporated into the Final CEQA documentation. • The City will be responsible for any and all filing fees payable to the San Bernardino County Clerk or other agencies.
• Coordination with public agencies is limited to the assumed scope above and budgeted hours provided.

Ardurra will provide draft and final Technical Memorandums for the City’s review and approval. Following the City’s approval of the TMs recommendations, Ardurra will prepare a preliminary design report (PDR) and 30% design drawings. Ardurra will provide a draft and final PDR for the City’s review and approval. 206
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 9 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com

Ardurra will prepare the 30% design drawings for the full width improvement of Grove Avenue from curb to curb. The 30% design drawings will consist of these disciplines:

• Roadway
• Drainage
• Potable Water
• Recycled Water
• Sewer

The other disciplines will be added to the 60% drawings, including Traffic Signal Plans, Signing and Striping Plans, Street Light Plans, Fiber Broadband Plans, and Structural Plans.

Task 5 – DRAWING SET - FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENTS (CURB TO CURB ONLY)

NOTE: This scope assumes that all deliverables will be submitted electronically. The City has moved t o processing all reviews, planchecks, encroachment pe rmits, bidding the project, etc. via their online system.

Plans, Specs, and Estimates (60%, 90%, 100%) (No Bid Package) The approved preliminary design will be advanced th rough the 60%, 90%, 100% milestones to prepare complete plans, specifications, and engineer’s opin ion of probable construction cost (PS&E) for the fu ll width improvements (curb to curb only, no parkways, driveways, or sidewalks). Once the 100% PS&E for the full-width improvements are approved by the Cit y, Ardurra will prepare a single Bid Package under Task 6. Ardurra assumes that the full-width improv ements will include ultimate ROW limits (either through dedications, acquisition, or eminent domain ). In addition, the full-width improvements will include the SCE Rule 20 undergrounding located behi nd the parkways, the SCE high voltage power poles relocation to behind the ultimate location of the c urb. This assumption provides a clear corridor for the necessary utility improvements per the City’s Standards.

Ardurra assumes the existing driveways will be designed to City Standards in their existing location. Under Task 6, at locations where the City provides Developer approved plans, the new driveways will be moved to their ultimate location shown by the Developer’s plans (if available).

The subsequent milestones will include these disciplines plan sets, each with specific general sheets.

• Roadway Improvement Plans
• Drainage Improvement Plans
• Traffic Signal Plans
• Signing and Striping Plans
• Street Light Plans
• Fiber Broadband Plans
• Landscape Plans
• Sewer Improvement Plans
• Water Improvement Plans
207
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 10 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com • Recycled Water Improvement Plans
• Structural Plans

Additional clarifications where needed are described below to provide clear scope of work:

Traffic Signal Plans
Ardurra will prepare permanent traffic signal desig n plans (assuming three) and temporary traffic sign al design plans for the intersection of Grove Ave. at E. Riverside Dr. (existing traffic signal location) . Safety lighting and CCTV coverage at intersections will be incorporated into the traffic signal design plans.

Ardurra will coordinate with the dry utilities subcontractor for electrical services to the traffic signals, and for vertical clearance with the SCE overhead power lines to the traffic signal poles. Design will be based on City standards and guidelines, CalTrans standard s and guidelines, CA MUTCD, and Federal MUTCD as applicable.

Signing and Striping Plans
Ardurra will prepare signing and striping plans based on City standards and guidelines, CalTrans standards and guidelines, CA MUTCD, and Federal MUTCD as applicable.

Streetlight Plans
Ardurra will prepare plans for corridor streetlight s. Corridor streetlighting design will be based on City standards for luminaire wattage and pole placement per roadway widths. Ardurra will coordinate with the dry utilities subcontractor for electrical serv ices to streetlighting and for SCE overhead lines v ertical clearance to streetlight poles. Ardurra will perfor m voltage drop and electrical load calculations for streetlights.

Fiber Broadband Plans
Ardurra will provide basemaps of the improvements, including the ROW at the time of construction, to the City’s Broadband Team. It is our understanding that the City’s Broadband Team will provide the Fiber layout, number of fibers, handhole locations, handhole sizing, and specifications to Ardurra. Ardurra will prepare detailed design plans for fiber broadband. Fiber design will be based on City’s layout, standards, and specifications.

Landscape Plans
KTUA will develop construction drawings for the 28-foot wide median. The plans will include irrigation of planting areas at 20' scale, specifically calling out all pipe and equipment sizing and types, and will include legend and details required to install the irrigati on system. A Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet sh all be provided inclusive of the Hydrozone information table and Water budget calculations (MAWA, ETWU) as required by City. This also includes the recycle d water title sheet required for the irrigation sys tem.

Planting Plans and Details will graphically locate and identify planting materials at 20' scale, inclu ding specific quantities, sizes and varieties, and will include details and a planting legend to install th e plant materials.
208
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 11 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com Ardurra will prepare design plans for electrical and communications connections to irrigation controllers (up to four). Ardurra will coordinate with landscap e architect, KTUA, for the location of irrigation controllers. Ardurra will coordinate with dry utilities subcontractor, Moran Utilities, for electrical services to irrigation controllers.

Structural Plans and Details – Basic Services
Ardurra will advance the preliminary structural design into final Construction Documents for the Ultimate Improvements. Structural Plans and Details will co nsist of large diameter piping (below grade); modifications to existing retaining wall adjacent to existing detention pond that is south-east of Riverside Drive; and up to 1,000 lineal feet of retaining walls (retained height up to 6’).

TASK 6 – BID PACKAGE - EXCLUDING LAST LANE IMPROVEMENTS

Plans, Specs, and Estimates (Draft and Final Bid Package) (Assumed One Bid Package) This scope includes updating the 100% plans approve d by the City under Task 5 to screen the improvements of the last lane improvements. This c hange will result in major revisions to the plans t o ensure constructability of the various improvements , utilities, etc. The full-width improvements developed under Task 5 will be screened back and sh own as future improvements. This scope also includes redesign of the roadway, drainage, and uti lities since some transitions may require major redesign efforts. Ardurra anticipates the revision s to the plans will include, but not limited, to, t he following major items:

• Screen back curb and gutter and last lane road pavement and change construction notes to state future improvements
• Screen back streetlights, broadband, dry utilities, and other last lane improvements and change construction notes to state future improvements
• Signing and striping plans will be updated to show exclusion of last lane and transitions to existing conditions
• New utilities will need to be redesigned if they ar e located outside the City’s existing ROW that will not be dedicated, acquired or taken possession of through eminent domain. • Where SCE has existing power lines, redesign will b e necessary to avoid the poles during the interim condition.

The last lane improvements included in the Bid Pack age will be those improvements along roadway segments where participating developers (DIF funds) will reimburse the City for constructing the last lane improvements. We assume the City will advise Ardur ra of the participating developers prior to the development of the draft Bid Package. Ardurra has assumed two City reviews since the plans will require major revisions to screen back future improvements and update the designs to accommodate the various transitions and existing conditions. The last lane improvements will be limited to:

209
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 12 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com • Widen pavement from the center lane to the new curb and gutter • Curb and gutter improvements (no parkway, no sidewalk) • Grading transitions and interim retaining walls where required • Temporary v-ditches or gutters to transition full-width improvements to interim improvements • Streetlights (may be installed the entire length if they do not conflict with SCE, existing infrastructure, and the City obtains the ROW necessary--- TBD) • Fiber Broadband improvements plans. Ardurra assumes that the City of Ontario Broadband group OntarioNet will perform fiber network design, splicing design, and field splicing.

The subsequent milestones will include these disciplines plan sets, each with specific general sheets.

Drainage Improvement Plans
The interim drainage design will establish interim grading, storm drain alignments, hydraulic grade lines, inlet locations, structures, downstream connections, and transition improvements necessary to maintain positive drainage throughout the interim condition. The approved hydraulic design prepared for the full- width improvements will be evaluated and updated, as necessary, to verify adequate performance of the phased drainage system while maintaining compatibil ity with the full-width improvements. The design will accommodate future frontage improvements by allowing construction of ultimate drainage facilities while maintaining hydraulic continuity with the int erim drainage system and minimizing future reconstruction.

Streetlight Plans
Based on the segments of four lanes development ver sus two lanes, it is our understanding that some portions of the corridor may need interim lighting. Ardurra will evaluate options and discuss with the City to provide interim lighting either on SCE poles or by installing permanent poles, if feasible, to mini mize rework for full width construction. Ardurra will pe rform voltage drop and electrical load calculations for streetlights.

210
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 13 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com TASK 7 – PERMITS

Permit Workplan and Log
Ardurra will track key decisions, contact information, permit requirements, and approvals throughout the duration of the project. The Log will be created using Microsoft Excel and will be shared using Sharepoint with the City PM. The following permitting requirements were identified:
• Water Quality Management Plan
• Engineering Report for Use of Recycled Water
• Division of Drinking Water
• Inland Empire Utilities Agency
• San Bernardino County Flood Control District

TASK 8 – SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AND FRANCHISE UTILITIES

Moran Utility Services will begin their scope with the initial Master Planning efforts to ensure each dry utility company is prepared to engage in the coordination of needs as a result of the widening efforts. This includes acquisition of facility maps, team and utility meetings, coordination of project exhibits, as well as site visits. This initial planning effort will incorporate the City’s overall project needs along with identifying associated utility company requirements.

Once this initial effort is complete, Moran will develop applicable design concepts and layouts for the dry utility systems, including both the overhead relocation and the ultimate underground conversion. This is an iterative process that includes the integration of several disciplines, and an ongoing participatio n in design team meetings. This consultant coordination begins at project inception and continues through issuance of final schematic design documents. Moran will prepare dry utility composite design consisting of applicable civil base files; electric and gas, and cable television facilities duct and structure plans, trench path and specifications.

Moran will coordinate with electric, gas, telecommu nications, and cable television through final approvals, contracts, invoices, and easements. As the project progresses, the dry utility layout continues to be updated and distributed to the assigned design team members for review and input. Ultimately, the final composite will reflect all final site designs and will be a valuable plan during the construction phase.

It will also be submitted to electric and gas to fa cilitate their design development and speed up the turnaround times of their final designs.

Based of the initial assumptions and project description, Moran Utilities identified the anticipated work orders (or scope) needed to provide dry utility services to the project.

WORK ORDER 1 – MASTER PLANNING
This work order supports the master planning effort s at the start of the project to ensure aspects of the project’s scope are understood. Includes field visi ts, team meetings, master planning exhibit(s), gene ral project oversight and coordination with stakeholder s during initial phase(s), evaluation of the ultima te relocation of the transmission poles and the possib le need to maintain a separate distribution system to serve existing properties and provide service to new city owned pedestals. 211
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 14 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com

WORK ORDER 2 – OVERHEAD TO OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION RELOCATION This work order supports the relocation of approxim ately 6,000 linear feet of existing overhead SCE transmission facilities. The relocation will commence just north of Riverside Dr and will conclude just east and west of Grove Ave. at Schaefer. Scope includes consulting, coordination, and dry utility composite plan. Includes up to one (1) independent relocation work order. If additional work orders are required to support the planned improvements, an addendum will be provided.

WORK ORDER 3 – OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION AND COMMUNICATION CONVERSION This work order supports the effort to coordinate t he conversion of approximately 9,000 linear feet of existing overhead SCE distribution and communicatio n facilities to an underground joint trench system.

The conversion will commence just north of Riverside Dr. and will conclude just south of Edison Ave. Scope includes consulting, coordination, dry utility comp osite plan, and SCE applicant design assist service s.

Includes up to two (2) independent conversion work orders. If additional work orders are required to support the planned improvements, an addendum will be provided.

WORK ORDER 4 – OVERHEAD TO OVERHEAD SCE DISTRIBUTION AND COMMUNICATIONS RELOCATION IF NEEDED , this work order supports the effort to relocate approximately 9,000 linear feet of existing SCE overhead distribution and communication lines. If n eeded, the relocation will commence just north of Riverside Dr. and will conclude just south of Edison Ave. Scope includes consulting, coordination, and dry utility composite plan. Includes up to two (2) inde pendent relocation work orders. If additional work orders are required to support the planned improvements, an addendum will be provided.

WORK ORDER 5 – SCE TRANSMISSION CONSENT TO CONSTRUCT
This work order supports the consulting and coordin ation associated with obtaining SCE’s consent to construct within their prescriptive rights and/or e asement(s) associated with the 66kV and 2x 200kV transmission systems adjacent to Grove Ave. Additionally, all improvements planned within the 2x-220kV easement(s) crossing Grove Ave. approximately 875’ north of Schaefer Ave will require review and approval of land use conformance by SCE. Includes up to one (1) independent consent submittal package.

If additional consent submittals are required to support the planned improvements, an addendum will be provided.

WORK ORDER 6 – SCE DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT AND QUITCLAIM COORDINATION This work order supports the consulting and coordin ation associated with granting easements for all of SCE’s distribution equipment being relocated or installed within areas without prior rights. This work order will also support any quitclaims that become availa ble as a result of relocating SCE’s existing facili ties.

Includes two (2) independent easement and quitclaim requests. If additional requests are required to support the planned improvements, an addendum will be provided.

WORK ORDER 7 - EXISTING CUSTOMER DRY UTILITY SERVICE REFEEDS This work order supports the research, consulting, and coordination of all dry utility service refeeds associated with the relocation of existing systems. Includes electric, communication, and natural gas service refeeds as needed. There are approximately thirty-two (32) properties that may require coordination to support the revised dry utility ser vices. This work order includes up to thirty-two (3 2) requests.

212
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 15 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com WORK ORDER 8 – NEW SERVICES FOR PROPOSED IRR/TC/SLTL PEDESTALS This work order supports new business line and service extensions to proposed irrigation, traffic control, and streetlight pedestals. Scope includes consultin g, coordination, applicant design services, and processing of meter applications. Includes up to th ree (3) independent work orders. If additional work orders are required to support the planned improvements, an addendum will be provided.

TEAM MEETINGS
We have included a separate item to allow for team meeting participation. This will be billed monthly on an hourly basis only as meetings occur. Includes si xty (60) hours. If additional time is needed for te am meetings, an addendum will be provided.

TASK 9 – BID PHASE SUPPORT SERVICES

During bidding, Ardurra will provide interpretation and consultation regarding questions and/or requests for clarification to the plans and specifications. Ardurra will assist and support the City by taking the lead in preparing bid addenda as required to provide cla rification to contract documents and responses to Requests for Information (RFI). Ardurra will help C ity staff with technical details required for the s taff report to the City Council. For scope purposes, it is assumed that bid phase services will be limited to one bid package.

Pre-Bid Conference
Ardurra will attend one (1) pre-bid meeting and ans wer questions from potential bidders. Ardurra will facilitate, prepare agenda, prepare meeting minutes, and distribute meeting minutes to City for publishing on its electronic bid management system, PlanetBids.

Request for Information (10 total)
Ardurra will respond to questions as directed by the City.

Prepare and Issue Addenda (3 total)
Ardurra will prepare up to three (3) addenda as required. The addenda will be submitted to City Staff for review and publishing on PlanetBids.

Review/Evaluate Bidder Qualifications
Ardurra will contact Bidders reference and review t heir qualifications meet the contract document requirements.

Bid Review & Recommendation for Award
Ardurra will perform a bid evaluation for the two lowest bids including, review of bid documents to ensure all forms were submitted and complete, contact refe rences, and verify contractor and subcontractor’s State licenses. Consultant will provide to the City , a written recommendation for award to the lowest responsible Bidder.

Conformed Documents
Ardurra will incorporate any design changes and/or clarifications arising from the biding phase questions and/or amendments into the contract documents to form a set of conformed documents. The conformed documents will be forward to the City in electronic format. City will print the necessary copies for Contractor’s use and other project team members.
213
Mr. Gonzalez
August 10, 2026

Page 16 of 16 ends

3737 Birch Street, Suite 250
| Newport Beach, CA 92660 | 661.748.3893 | www.ardurra.com

Task 10 – ADDITIONAL SERVICES

Additional Services (10%)
Additional services will be provided upon the City’ s request, up to an amount equal to 10% of the contracted fee. Work under this task will be pre-a pproved and defined by the Ardurra and the City in advance.

EXCLUSIONS:

Exclusions stated herein can easily be added upon t he City’s request. They are listed here for clarit y on the division of work, scope of work understanding, and based on previous scoping meetings with the City.

1. Scope of services not listed above.

2. Onsite improvements

3. Multipurpose Trail is deferred to a later phase of this project

4. Traffic control plans will be prepared by the Contractor

5. Traffic study and traffic signal warrant analysis will be provided by the City

6. Design of the gas line

7. Escrow fees and title insurance, assumed the City will pay these directly

8. Permit fees, assumed the City will pay these directly

214
Design Fee Proposal
Grove Avenue Improvements
Surveyor Potholing Geotech Landscape Dry Utilities Biologist Archeologist Land Acquisition Project
Director
Quality
Control
Project
Manager
Assistant
Project
Manager
Roadway
Lead
Traffic
Lead
OMUC Utilities
Lead
Storm
Drain Lead Electrical Lead Permit
Coordinator
Utility
Coordinato
r
Structural
Lead
Project
Engineer V
Project
Engineer IV
Project
Engineer II Engineer I Project
Designer V
CAD
Designer III
CAD
Designer II Admin Labor Hrs Labor Costs O'Day BESS Converse KTUA Moran ELMT BCR Clark Land Solutions 10%
2027 Billing Rates (2024 Rates Escalated 3%
Annually) $360 $317 $306 $220 $273 $273 $273 $273 $273 $229 $229 $220 $27 3 $229 $186 $180 $190 $169 $153 $124 TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND

ADMINISTRATION
PM & Admin, Progress Reporting, Invoicing 40 80 120 60 6 0 40 400 103,000 $ - $ 103,000 $ Bi-Weekly Progress Meetings 40 80 120 100 60 100 24 40 564 14 7,772 $ - $ 147,772 $ Project Decision Log 40 80 120 24 40 304 76,792 $ - $ 76,792 $ Stakeholder Coordination Meetings 40 80 120 12 40 292 73,5 16 $ - $ 73,516 $ Coordination Meetings with Other City's
Consultants 120 120 120 80 40 80 24 40 624 172,432 $ - $ 172,4 32 $ 573,512 $
TASK 2 DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW
Data Collection and Review 2 4 4 40 24 74 19,000 $ - $ $1,200 20,200 $ Utility Research and Coordination 2 4 4 120 11 1 142 33,236 $ - $ 33,236 $ Utility Potholing (50 total) 2 4 4 17 16 16 1 60 14,034 $ $99,000 9,900 $ 122,934 $ Review Westlands GPR and Implement Findings 2 4 4 16 16 1 6 58 13,592 $ - $ $1,200 14,792 $ Surveying and Mapping 2 4 4 16 16 42 9,656 $ $109,0 00 10,900 $ 129,556 $ Geotechnical Investigation (14 borings) 2 4 4 16 26 6,952 $ $65,000 6,500 $ 78,452 $ 399,170 $
TASK 3 RIGHT OF WAY SERVICES
Right of Way Assessment (2 miles of Grove
Avenue) 12 4 12 8 8 44 11,012 $ - $ 11,012 $ Property Appraisals and Acquisition (23 parcels) 12 4 16 4,552 $ $317,000 31,700 $ 353,252 $ Plat and Legal Documents (31 total) 12 4 8 20 32 76 18,148 $ $214,000 21,400 $ 253,548 $ 617,812 $
TASK 4 PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND 30% PLANS
Tech Memo - Construction Cost Analysis for
Last Lane Improvements 4 2 12 4 8 16 8 44 44 5 147 35,389 $ - $ 35,389 $ Tech Memo - Existing Conditions Constraints 4 2 12 2 4 8 7 2 24 32 17 177 42,319 $ - $ 42,319 $ Tech Memo - Design Criteria 4 2 12 2 6 4 14 16 24 16 1 101 24,62 7 $ - $ 24,627 $ Tech Memo - Environmental CEQA Clearance 4 2 12 24 80 16 2 4 162 40,080 $ $7,000 $18,000 2,500 $ 67,580 $ Tech Memo - Right of Way Assessment 4 2 12 24 42 10,016 $ - $ 10,016 $ Tech Memo - Utility Impacts 4 2 12 16 24 40 98 21,824 $ - $ 21,824 $ Tech Memo - Permit Workplan 4 2 12 24 42 10,016 $ - $ 10,016 $ Tech Memo - Hydraulic Analysis (Water,
Sewer, Recycled Water) 4 2 12 60 78 20,900 $ - $ 20,900 $ Tech Memo - Hydraulic Analysis (Storm
Drains) 6 2 12 8 20 128 196 28 400 88,930 $ - $ 88,930 $ Tech Memo - Opinion of Probable
Construction Cost 4 2 12 4 4 16 4 28 24 40 4 142 33,420 $ - $ 33,420 $ Tech Memo - Opinion of Construction
Schedule 4 2 12 1 2 16 1 14 24 30 106 24,878 $ - $ 24,878 $ Preliminary Construction Plans (30%) 21 2 12 14 16 20 80 40 208 180 220 813 164,627 $ $23,000 2,300 $ $500 190, 427 $ Draft Preliminary Design Report 27 2 12 2 16 4 32 80 64 3 242 5 7,284 $ - $ 57,284 $ Final Preliminary Design Report 24 2 12 1 16 2 28 80 58 223 52 ,799 $ - $ 52,799 $ 680,409 $
TASK 5 DRAWING SET - FULL WIDTH

IMPROVEMENTS (CURB TO CURB ONLY)
Plans, Specs, and Estimates (60%, 90%, 100%)
(No Bid Package)
Roadway Improvement Plans 60 2 160 360 680 20 400 1682 359,4 72 $ - $ 359,472 $ Drainage Improvement Plans 16 2 80 160 280 20 200 200 958 191 ,484 $ - $ 191,484 $ Traffic Signal Plans 2 40 210 150 20 422 100,562 $ - $ 100,562 $ Signing and Striping Plans 2 40 140 80 20 282 68,432 $ - $ 68,432 $ Street Light Plans 2 20 120 60 20 222 53,792 $ - $ 53,792 $ Fiber Broadband Plans 2 20 90 60 20 192 45,602 $ - $ 45,602 $ Landscape Plans 2 8 30 16 20 76 17,762 $ $208,000 20,8 00 $ 246,562 $ Sewer Improvement Plans 60 2 16 48 80 120 120 120 80 646 131,2 16 $ - $ 131,216 $ Water Improvement Plans 60 2 16 48 80 120 120 120 80 646 131,2 16 $ - $ 131,216 $ Recycled Water Improvement Plans 60 2 16 48 80 120 120 120 8 0 646 131,216 $ - $ 131,216 $ Structural Plans 2 80 82 18,212 $ - $ 18,21 2 $ Quality Control and Interdisciplinary Reviews 180 2 12 2 80 2 4 4 286 85,080 $ - $ 85,080 $ Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) 8 2 12 4 12 24 12 44 26 144 36,832 $ - $ 36,832 $ Opinion of Construction Schedule 4 2 12 4 4 24 12 24 6 92 24,2 00 $ - $ 24,200 $ Public Works Contract (Front End) 4 2 12 4 24 12 24 6 88 23,1 08 $ - $ 23,108 $ Technical Specifications 20 2 12 4 16 24 12 28 16 134 35,500 $ - $ 35,500 $ Comment Review Workshop 2 12 4 8 12 2 22 16 78 19,332 $ - $ 19,332 $ Comment Log Input and Responses 4 2 12 4 8 12 12 36 22 112 28, 268 $ - $ 28,268 $ 1,730,086 $
TASK 6 BID PACKAGE - EXCLUDING LAST LANE

IMPROVEMENTS
Plans, Specs, and Estimates (Draft, Final, and
Approved Bid Package) (Assumed One Bid
Package)
Roadway Improvement Plans 24 2 160 360 680 20 400 1646 348,0 60 $ - $ 348,060 $ Drainage Improvement Plans 16 2 80 160 280 20 200 200 958 191 ,484 $ - $ 191,484 $ Traffic Signal Plans 2 20 120 120 20 282 64,952 $ - $ 64,952 $ Signing and Striping Plans 2 30 160 100 20 312 74,882 $ - $ 74,882 $ Street Light Plans 2 20 140 80 20 262 62,972 $ - $ 62,972 $ Fiber Broadband Plans 2 10 70 40 20 142 33,692 $ - $ 33,692 $ PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND 30% PLANS

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW

RIGHT OF WAY SERVICES

DRAWING SET - FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENTS (CURB TO CURB ONLY) TOTAL Task Item
Labor Hours
Sub
Markup Direct Costs Subconsultants
Grove Avenue Improvements_Fee Proposal Page 1 of 2 8/10/2026 215
Design Fee Proposal
Grove Avenue Improvements
Surveyor Potholing Geotech Landscape Dry Utilities Biologist Archeologist Land Acquisition Project
Director
Quality
Control
Project
Manager
Assistant
Project
Manager
Roadway
Lead
Traffic
Lead
OMUC Utilities
Lead
Storm
Drain Lead Electrical Lead Permit
Coordinator
Utility
Coordinato
r
Structural
Lead
Project
Engineer V
Project
Engineer IV
Project
Engineer II Engineer I Project
Designer V
CAD
Designer III
CAD
Designer II Admin Labor Hrs Labor Costs O'Day BESS Converse KTUA Moran ELMT BCR Clark Land Solutions 10%
2027 Billing Rates (2024 Rates Escalated 3%
Annually) $360 $317 $306 $220 $273 $273 $273 $273 $273 $229 $229 $220 $27 3 $229 $186 $180 $190 $169 $153 $124 TOTAL Task Item
Labor Hours
Sub
Markup Direct Costs Subconsultants
Landscape Plans 2 8 30 16 20 76 17,762 $ $16,000 1,600 $ 35,362 $ Sewer Improvement Plans 60 2 16 48 80 120 120 120 80 646 131,2 16 $ - $ 131,216 $ Water Improvement Plans 60 2 16 48 80 120 120 120 80 646 131,2 16 $ - $ 131,216 $ Recycled Water Improvement Plans 60 2 16 48 80 120 120 120 8 0 646 131,216 $ - $ 131,216 $ Structural Plans 2 80 82 18,212 $ - $ 18,21 2 $ Quality Control and Interdisciplinary Reviews 192 2 2 1 00 2 4 4 306 91,704 $ - $ 91,704 $ Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) 8 2 12 4 8 2 4 12 40 26 136 34,648 $ - $ 34,648 $ Opinion of Construction Schedule 4 2 12 4 4 24 12 4 6 72 18,74 0 $ - $ 18,740 $ Public Works Contract (Front End) 4 2 12 4 24 12 48 6 112 29, 660 $ - $ 29,660 $ Technical Specifications 20 2 12 4 16 24 12 52 16 158 42,052 $ - $ 42,052 $ Comment Review Workshop 2 12 4 8 12 2 22 16 78 19,332 $ - $ 19,332 $ Comment Log Input and Responses 4 2 12 4 8 12 12 36 22 112 28, 268 $ - $ 28,268 $ BID PACKAGE - EXCLUDING LAST LANE IMPROVEMENTS 1,487 ,668 $ TASK 7 PERMITS
Permit Workplan and Log 2 4 8 80 24 118 26,460 $ - $ 26,460 $ Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 2 4 16 12 20 20 20 94 2 2,368 $ - $ 22,368 $ Engineering Report (Recycled Water) 2 4 12 18 4,240 $ - $ 4,240 $ Division of Drinking Water 2 4 8 12 24 16 24 90 18,952 $ - $ 18,952 $ Inland Empire Utilities Agency 2 4 8 12 24 16 24 90 18,952 $ - $ 18,952 $ San Bernardino County Flood Control District 2 2 4 8 10 1 2 18 24 46 24 150 32,810 $ - $ $500 33,310 $ 124,282 $
TASK 8 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AND

FRANCHISE UTILITIES
Master Planning 12 12 3,672 $ $25,000 2,500 $ 31,172 $ OH to OH SCE Transmission Relocation 12 12 3,672 $ $126,000 12,600 $ 142,272 $ OH to UG SCE Distribution and Comm
Conversion 12 12 3,672 $ $270,000 27,000 $ 300,672 $ OH to OH SCE Distribution and Comm
Relocation 12 12 3,672 $ $207,000 20,700 $ 231,372 $ SCE Transmission Consent to Construct 12 12 3,672 $ $36,000 3,600 $ 43,272 $ SCE Distribution Easement and Quitclaim 12 12 3,672 $ $25,000 2,500 $ 31,172 $ Existing Customer Dry Ut Service Refeed (32
total) 13 13 3,978 $ $121,000 12,100 $ 137,078 $ New City Services (Irr/TC/Street Lights) (3
total) 14 14 4,284 $ $50,000 5,000 $ 59,284 $ Meetings (60 total) 15 15 4,590 $ $20,000 2,000 $ 26,590 $ 1,002,884 $
TASK 9 BID PHASE SUPPORT SERVICES
Pre-Bid Conference 2 2 2 1 1 1 9 2,330 $ - $ 2,330 $ Miscellaneous Bid Phase Services
Request for Information (10) 2 12 2 10 12 2 13 6 2 61 15,353 $ - $ 15,353 $ Prepare and Issue Addenda (3) 2 12 2 6 12 1 27 12 4 78 19,264 $ - $ 19,264 $ Review/Evaluate Bidder Qualifications 2 2 2 8 8 22 5,966 $ - $ 5,966 $ Bid Review & Recommendation for Award 2 2 2 4 1 5 1 17 4,514 $ - $ 4,514 $ Conformed Documents 2 4 2 2 12 1 14 4 24 8 73 16,611 $ - $ 16,611 $ 64,038 $
TASK 10 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Street Light Plans (TBD) 0 - $ - $ - $ Fiber Optic Plans (TBD) 0 - $ - $ - $ Title Reports (31 total) 0 - $ $27,000 2,70 0 $ 29,700 $ Additional Services (10%) 745,507 $
775,207 $
280 1048 726 1114 668 676 752 641 48 164 120 160 3362 1020 4492 72 0 1228 1590 400 680 19889 100,800 $ 332,216 $ 222,156 $ 245,080 $ 182 ,364 $ 184,548 $ 205,296 $ 174,993 $ 13,104 $ 37,556 $ 27,480 $ 35,200 $ 917,826 $ 233,580 $ 835,512 $ 129,600 $ 23 3,320 $ 268,710 $ 61,200 $ 84,320 $ 4,524,861 $ 3 50,000 $ 99,000 $ 65,000 $ 247,000 $ 880,000 $ 7 ,000 $ 18,000 $ 317,000 $ 198,300 $ 3,400 $ 7,455,068 $

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AND FRANCHISE UTILITIES

ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Total Hours:

Total Fee Proposal

PERMITS

BID PHASE SUPPORT SERVICES
Grove Avenue Improvements_Fee Proposal Page 2 of 2 8/10/2026 216
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Grove Avenue Improvements 359 days Tue 9/8/26 Fri 2/11/28 2 Task 1 - Project Management 1 day Tue 9/8/26 Tue 9/8/26 3 Project Kickoff Meeting 1 day Tue 9/8/26 Tue 9/8/26
4 Task 2 - Data Collection and Investigations 166 days Tue 9/8/26 Tue 5/11/27 5 Data Collection and Review 10 days Tue 9/8/26 Mon 9/21/26 6 Utility Research and Coordination 20 days Tue 9/8/26 Mon 10/5/26 7 Potholing 35 days Wed 3/24/27 Tue 5/11/27 31
8 Surveying and Mapping 50 days Tue 9/8/26 Wed 11/18/26 9 Geotechnical Investigation 60 days Mon 11/30/26 Mon 3/1/27 19 10 Task 3 - Right of Way Services 200 days Mon 5/3/27 Fri 2/11/28 11 Right of Way Acquisition 200 days Mon 5/3/27 Fri 2/11/28 78FF 12 Task 4 - Preliminary Design and 30% Plans 144 days Tue 9/22/26 Fri 4/23/27 13 Draft Technical Memos 25 days Tue 9/22/26 Tue 10/27/26 14 Prepare Internal Submittal 15 days Tue 9/22/26 Tue 10/13/26 5 15 QC Review 5 days Wed 10/14/26 Tue 10/20/26 14
16 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Wed 10/21/26 Tue 10/27/26 15 17 Submit Draft Technical Memos 0 days Tue 10/27/26 Tue 10/27/26 16 18 City Review 15 days Wed 10/28/26 Wed 11/18/26 17
19 Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 5 days Thu 11/19/26 Wed 11/25/26 18 20 Final Technical Memos 25 days Mon 11/30/26 Thu 1/7/27 21 Prepare Internal Submittal 15 days Mon 11/30/26 Fri 12/18/26 19 22 QC Review 5 days Mon 12/21/26 Tue 12/29/26 21
23 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Wed 12/30/26 Thu 1/7/27 22 24 Submit Final Technical Memos 3 days Fri 1/8/27 Tue 1/12/27 23 25 Draft Preliminary Design Report and 30% Plans 30 days Wed 1/13/27 Thu 2/25/27 26 Prepare Internal Submittal 20 days Wed 1/13/27 Wed 2/10/27 24 27 QC Review 5 days Thu 2/11/27 Thu 2/18/27 26
28 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Fri 2/19/27 Thu 2/25/27 27 29 Submit Draft Preliminary Design Report and 30% Plans 3 days Fri 2/26/27 Tue 3/2/27 28 30 City Review 10 days Wed 3/3/27 Tue 3/16/27 29
31 Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 5 days Wed 3/17/27 Tue 3/23/27 30 32 Final Preliminary Design and 30% Plans 20 days Wed 3/24/27 Tue 4/20/27 33 Prepare Internal Submittal 10 days Wed 3/24/27 Tue 4/6/27 31 34 QC Review 5 days Wed 4/7/27 Tue 4/13/27 33
35 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Wed 4/14/27 Tue 4/20/27 34 36 Submit Final Preliminary Design Report and 30% Plans 3 days Wed 4/21/27 Fri 4/23/27 35 37 Task 5 - Drawing Set - Full Width Improvements (Curb to Curb) 104 days Mon 4/26/27 Tue 9/21/27 38 60% Design 20 days Mon 4/26/27 Fri 5/21/27 36
39 Prepare Internal Submittal 10 days Mon 4/26/27 Fri 5/7/27 40 QC Review 5 days Mon 5/10/27 Fri 5/14/27 39
41 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Mon 5/17/27 Fri 5/21/27 40 42 Submit 60% Design 3 days Mon 5/24/27 Wed 5/26/27 41
43 City Review 15 days Thu 5/27/27 Thu 6/17/27 42
44 Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 5 days Fri 6/18/27 Thu 6/24/27 43 45 90% Design 20 days Fri 6/25/27 Fri 7/23/27
46 Prepare Internal Submittal 10 days Fri 6/25/27 Fri 7/9/27 44 47 QC Review 5 days Mon 7/12/27 Fri 7/16/27 46
48 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Mon 7/19/27 Fri 7/23/27 47 49 Submit 90% Design 3 days Mon 7/26/27 Wed 7/28/27 48
50 City Review 10 days Thu 7/29/27 Wed 8/11/27 49
51 Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 5 days Thu 8/12/27 Wed 8/18/27 50 52 100% Design 20 days Thu 8/19/27 Thu 9/16/27
53 Prepare Internal Submittal 10 days Thu 8/19/27 Wed 9/1/27 51 54 QC Review 5 days Thu 9/2/27 Thu 9/9/27 53
55 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Fri 9/10/27 Thu 9/16/27 54 56 Submit 100% Design 3 days Fri 9/17/27 Tue 9/21/27 55 57 Drawing Set - Full Width Improvements - COMPLETE 0 days Tue 9/21/27 Tue 9/21/27 56 58 Task 6 - Bid Package - Excluding Last Lane Improvements 101 days Wed 9/22/27 Fri 2/11/28 59 60% Bid Documents 20 days Wed 9/22/27 Wed 10/20/27
60 Prepare Internal Submittal 10 days Wed 9/22/27 Tue 10/5/27 57 61 QC Review 5 days Wed 10/6/27 Wed 10/13/27 60
62 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Thu 10/14/27 Wed 10/20/27 61 63 Submit Draft Bid Documents 0 days Wed 10/20/27 Wed 10/20/27 62 64 City Review 10 days Thu 10/21/27 Wed 11/3/27 63
65 Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 5 days Thu 11/4/27 Wed 11/10/27 64 66 100% Bid Documents 20 days Fri 11/12/27 Thu 12/9/27 65 67 Prepare Internal Submittal 10 days Fri 11/12/27 Thu 11/25/27 68 QC Review 5 days Fri 11/26/27 Thu 12/2/27 67
69 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Fri 12/3/27 Thu 12/9/27 68 70 Submit 100% Bid Documents 3 days Fri 12/10/27 Tue 12/14/27 69 71 City Review 10 days Wed 12/15/27 Tue 12/28/27 70
72 Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 5 days Wed 12/29/27 Tue 1/4/28 71 73 Final Bid Documents 20 days Wed 1/5/28 Tue 2/1/28 72 74 Prepare Internal Submittal 10 days Wed 1/5/28 Tue 1/18/28 75 QC Review 5 days Wed 1/19/28 Tue 1/25/28 74
76 Incorporate Review Comments 5 days Wed 1/26/28 Tue 2/1/28 75 77 Submit Final Bid Documents 3 days Wed 2/2/28 Fri 2/4/28 76 78 City Upload Bid Documents to PlanetBids 5 days Mon 2/7/28 Fri 2/11/28 77 79 Task 7 - Permits 190 days Mon 5/10/27 Fri 2/4/28
80 Division of Drinking Water 90 days Thu 9/30/27 Fri 2/4/28 77FF 81 Inland Empire Utilities Agency 90 days Thu 9/30/27 Fri 2/4/28 77FF 82 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 190 days Mon 5/10/27 Fri 2/4/28 77FF Project Kickoff Meeting 9/8
Data Collection and Review 9/21
Utility Research and Coordination 10/5
Potholing 5/11
Surveying and Mapping 11/18
Geotechnical Investigation 3/1
Right of Way Acquisition 2/11
Prepare Internal Submittal 10/13
QC Review 10/20
Incorporate Review Comments 10/27
10/27
City Review 11/18
Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 11/25
Prepare Internal Submittal 12/18
QC Review 12/29
Incorporate Review Comments 1/7
Submit Final Technical Memos 1/12
Prepare Internal Submittal 2/10
QC Review 2/18
Incorporate Review Comments 2/25
Submit Draft Preliminary Design Report and 30% Plans 3/2 City Review 3/16
Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 3/23
Prepare Internal Submittal 4/6
QC Review 4/13
Incorporate Review Comments 4/20
Submit Final Preliminary Design Report and 30% Plans 4/23 Prepare Internal Submittal 5/7
QC Review 5/14
Incorporate Review Comments 5/21
Submit 60% Design 5/26
City Review 6/17
Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 6/24
Prepare Internal Submittal 7/9
QC Review 7/16
Incorporate Review Comments 7/23
Submit 90% Design 7/28
City Review 8/11
Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 8/18
Prepare Internal Submittal 9/1
QC Review 9/9
Incorporate Review Comments 9/16
Submit 100% Design 9/21
9/21
Prepare Internal Submittal 10/5
QC Review 10/13
Incorporate Review Comments 10/20
10/20
City Review 11/3
Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 11/10
Prepare Internal Submittal 11/25
QC Review 12/2
Incorporate Review Comments 12/9
Submit 100% Bid Documents 12/14
City Review 12/28
Comment Review and Schedule Workshop 1/4
Prepare Internal Submittal 1/18
QC Review 1/25
Incorporate Review Comments 2/1
Submit Final Bid Documents 2/4
City Upload Bid Documents to PlanetBids 2/11
Division of Drinking Water 2/4
Inland Empire Utilities Agency 2/4
San Bernardino County Flood Control District 2/4
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Qtr 3, 2025 Qtr 4, 2025 Qtr 1, 2026 Qtr 2, 2026 Qtr 3, 2026 Qtr 4, 2026 Qtr 1, 2027 Qtr 2, 2027 Qtr 3, 2027 Qtr 4, 2027 Qtr 1, 2028 Qtr 2, 2028 Ontario Ranch West
Grove Avenue Improvements
217
BB&K (2024) 6 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414

Attachment B

Exhibit “B” – SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
218
Vendor Name:

Agreement Type:

Description of Scope:

Documents Date ExecutedTask No. Agreement Value Total Not to Exceed Limit Fee Description PO No.

Original Agreement6/4/2024 0.0 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ On-Call Engineering Design Services N/A Task Order No. 0.1 1.0 200,000.00$ 400,000.00$ Task Order 0.1 authorizes the consultant to use
$25,000 to Provide as-needed engineering design
services for Regional Sports Complex - Sewer
Improvements at Vineyard.

Task Order No. 0.2 2.0 400,000.00$ 400,000.00$ Provide as-needed engineering design services for
UT1097 Western Trunk Sewer - Interim Diversion07166
Task Order No. 0.3 3.0 400,000.00$ 400,000.00$ Provide as-needed engineering design services for
UT1065 Water Main Improvements.

Task Order No. 0.4 4.0 600,000.00$ 600,000.00$ Provide as-needed engineering design services for
UT1097 Western Trunk Sewer - Interim Diversion08507
Amendment No.1 7/16/2024 1,784,432.00 $ 2,384,432.00$ D&C23-025 Sport Complex Offsites - revise the
scope of services and add funds
Amendment No.2 11/19/2024 72,780.00 $ 2,457,212.00$ D&C23-025 Sports Complex Offsites Amendment No.3 10/7/2025 588,842.00 $ 3,046,054.00$ D&C23-025c Sports Complex Offsites, Phase 2 Amendment No.4 4/7/2026 2,066,021.00 $ 5,112,075.00$ Engineering design services for UT1096 Western
Trunk Sewer Project 08367
Amendment No. 5 6/2/2026 664,696.00 $ 5,776,771.00$ D&C23-025 Sports Complex Offsites - revise the
scope of services and add funds
Amendment No. 6 9/15/2026 7,455,068.00 $ 13,231,839.00$ UT1103 Grove Avenue Corridor Improvements
TBD
13,231,839.00$
Total Not to Exceed Fee
Exhibit B
Ardurra Group
DSA - Amendment 5.0 to the On-Call Design Services
Professional Engineering Design Services for Grove Avenue Corridor Project 219
BB&K (2024) 1 AMENDMENT TO NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
AME
NDMENT NO. 2 TO THE DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND

FEHR & PEERS

1. Parties and Date.

This Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (as defined herein) is made and entered as of ____________, by and between the City of Ontario (“City”) and Fehr & Peers, an S Corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. Recitals.

2.1 Agreement. The City and Consultant have entered into an agreement entitled “Design Services Agreement for Services” dated April 2, 2024 (“Agreement”).

2.2 Amendment Purpose. The City and Consultant desire to amend the Agreement to provide additional On-Call Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Design Services for the Ontario Ranch West – Traffic Study for Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue Corridors for a revised cumulative contract total not-to-exceed amount of Six Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand, Two Hundred Eleven Dollars ($686,211). The Parties have heretofore entered into that Amendment No. 1 dated April 7, 2026.

2.3 Amendment Authority. This Amendment No. 2 is authorized pursuant to Section 3.8 of the Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Amendment. Section 3.10.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"3.10.1 Consultant’s Compensation for Basic Services. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The maximum compensation for Services to 220
BB&K (2024) 2 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
be
provided pursuant to each Task Order shall be set forth in the relevant Task Order. The total compensation for all Task Orders issued hereunder shall not exceed Six Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand, Two Hundred Eleven Dollars ($686,211) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. The Total Compensation, as may be adjusted upon mutual agreement, shall constitute complete and adequate payment for Services under this Agreement."

3.2 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 2, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 2. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 2, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 2.

3.4 Severability. If any portion of this Amendment No. 2 is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.5 Integration. This Amendment represents the entirety of the Parties’ understanding relating to the subject of this Amendment, including written or verbal communications between the Parties, which shall have no relevance unless expressly incorporated herein. This is an integrated amendment.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 221
BB&K (2024) 3 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE DESIGN SERVICES

AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO

AND FEHR & PEERS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment No. 2 as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ONTARIO FEHR & PEERS
By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

Approved By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
Approved as to Form:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
Attested By:

City Clerk
222
EXHIBIT "B"

SEE ATTACHMENT
223
3880 Lemon Street
, Suite 420 Riverside, CA 92501
July 8, 2026
Jay Bautista, P.E., T.E.

Traffic/Transportation Manager
City of Ontario
303 East B Street
Ontario, CA 91764
Subject: Proposal for Ontario Ranch West Tra ffic Study Task Order – 01 Ontario Ranch Road Corridor
Dear Jay:

Thank you for contacting Fehr & Peers to assist you with traffic analysis support for the Ontario Ranch West Traffic Study. As requested, we have prepared three separate task orders for the requested three corridors, which can be found at the following link:
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1nWMUkN62jscHfx20ZugFm9lIyWXVD0A&usp=sharing [google.com]
This task order is for the Ontario Ranch Road corridor which consists of nine intersections. Our proposed scope of work, schedule, and fee estimate are described below.

Scope of Work
TASK 1 – DATA REVIEW AND FORECASTING PREPARATION
Fehr & Peers will prepare traffic analysis to support the intersection designs at nine intersections along Ontario Ranch Road.

Fehr & Peers utilize available recent traffic studies, available traffic count data, and the SBTAM+ model created and recently updated to account for the City’s General Plan Update and recent General Plan Amendments to support the development of weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic forecasts for a 2050 buildout year. It is expected that some minor intersections will not have available data and traffic will be estimated by balancing between intersections with data. This scope assumes that no new model runs will be needed.

Fehr & Peers will summarize the data and new forecasts into a Draft Traffic Data and Forecasting Technical Memorandum for review and comment by the City of Ontario. We will respond to one round of comments and begin Task 2.

TASK 2 – TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
Fehr & Peers will use the Synchro 12 Software to prepare the AM and PM peak hour traffic operations assessment at each intersection. This analysis will confirm lane configurations and turn pocket lengths against the City’s Street Standards and identify if additional lanes, special traffic signal phasing, extended turn pockets, or other modifications are needed at each location. 224
July 8, 2026 | 2
Fehr & Peers will summarize the analysis into draft Traffic Operations and Design Recommendations Technical Memorandum that will include traffic volume figures with lane configurations and turn pocket lengths. We will respond to one round of comments and resubmit as final.

Fee and Schedule
Fehr & Peers will perform this work for a fixed fee of $16,000.

We will submit the draft letter report within four weeks following receipt of written authorization to proceed. Invoices will be submitted monthly for services rendered and are due and payable upon receipt.

If the terms of this proposal are acceptable to you, this letter can serve as our contractual agreement.

In that case, please return a signed copy of this letter to us.

We look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Paul Herrmann at (949) 308-6318.

Sincerely,

FEHR & PEERS
Paul Herrmann, T.E.

Principal
OC26-P3004.01
225
3880 Lemon Street
, Suite 420 Riverside, CA 92501
July 8, 2026
Jay Bautista, P.E., T.E.

Traffic/Transportation Manager
City of Ontario
303 East B Street
Ontario, CA 91764
Subject: Proposal for Ontario Ranch West Traffic Study Task Order – 02 Grove Avenue Corridor
Dear Jay:

Thank you for contacting Fehr & Peers to assist you with traffic analysis support for the Ontario Ranch West Traffic Study. As requested, we have prepared three separate task orders for the requested three corridors, which can be found at the following link:
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1nWMUkN62jscHfx20ZugFm9lIyWXVD0A&usp=sharing [google.com]
This task order is for the Grove Avenue corridor which consists of four intersections. Our proposed scope of work, schedule, and fee estimate are described below.

Scope of Work
TASK 1 – DATA REVIEW AND FORECASTING PREPARATION
Fehr & Peers will prepare traffic analysis to support the intersection designs at four intersections along Grove Avenue.

TASK 2 – TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
Fehr & Peers will use the Synchro 12 Software to prepare the AM and PM peak hour traffic operations assessment at each intersection. This analysis will confirm lane configurations and turn pocket lengths against the City’s Street Standards and identify if additional lanes, special traffic signal phasing, extended turn pockets, or other modifications are needed at each location. 226
July 8, 2026 | 2
Fehr & Peers will summarize the analysis into draft Traffic Operations and Design Recommendations Technical Memorandum that will include traffic volume figures with lane configurations and turn pocket lengths. We will respond to one round of comments and resubmit as final.

Fee and Schedule
Fehr & Peers will perform this work for a fixed fee of $6,000.

If the terms of this proposal are acceptable to you, this letter can serve as our contractual agreement.

In that case, please return a signed copy of this letter to us.

We look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Paul Herrmann at (949) 308-6318.

Sincerely,

FEHR & PEERS
Paul Herrmann, T.E.

Principal
OC26-P3004.02
227
BB&K (2024) 1 AMENDMENT TO NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414

AM
END
MENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

1. Parties and Date.

This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (as defined herein) is made and entered as of ____________, by and between the City of Ontario (“City”) and Harris & Associates, Inc, a California Corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. Recitals.

2.1 Agreement. The City and Consultant have entered into an agreement entitled “Professional Services Agreement” dated July 1, 2025 (“Agreement”).

2.2 Amendment Purpose. The City and Consultant desire to amend the Agreement to provide additional Professional Engineering Plan Check services for the Ontario Ranch West – Engineering Design of Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue Corridors for a revised cumulative contract total not-to-exceed amount of Five Million, Three Hundred and Ninety-Four Thousand, Nine Hundred and Seventy-Two Dollars ($5,394,972).

2.3 Amendment Authority. This Amendment No. 1 is authorized pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Amendment. Section 3.2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"3.2.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed five million, three hundred and ninety-four thousand, nine hundred and seventy-two PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR

DEBRA PORADA

MAYOR PRO TEM
ALAN D.WAPNER
JIM W. BOWMAN

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK
JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
228
BB&K (2024) 2 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
dollars ($5,394,972) without written approval by the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement."

3.2 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 1. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 1, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 1.

3.4 Severability. If any portion of this Amendment No. 1 is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.5 Integration. This Amendment represents the entirety of the Parties’ understanding relating to the subject of this Amendment, including written or verbal communications between the Parties, which shall have no relevance unless expressly incorporated herein. This is an integrated amendment.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
229
BB&K (2024) 3 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment No. 1 as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ONTARIO HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

Approved By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
Approved as to Form:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
Attested By:

City Clerk
230
101 Progress, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92618  p: 949.655.3900  www.WeAreHarris.com August 13, 2026
Mr. Jeffrey Tang, PE
Principal Engineer
City of Ontario
Engineering Department
303 East B Street
Ontario, CA 91764
RE: Ontario Ranch Road / Grove Corridor Plan Check Proposal Dear Jeff,
Pursuant to your request by email dated July 28, 2026, we understand that OMUC is leading an effort to design and improve Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue throughout the Ontario Ranch West development. OMUC has solicited a proposal from WestLAND Group, Inc. (WLG) to prepare designs for infrastructure improvements for Ontario Ranch Road and a proposal from Ardurra to prepare designs for infrastructure improvements for Grove Avenue.

In preparing this proposal we were provided with a portion of WLG’s and Ardurra’s proposals to OMUC to review their scopes of work, deliverables and schedule. We are also provided a proposal from Scott D. Walker with Danken Construction Engineering Group (DCEG) to provide constructability review services for the Ontario Ranch Road Bridge – Phase 2 (as described in their letter dated August 11, 2026).

WLG identified the following for Ontario Ranch Road:

Ontario Ranch Road: Euclid Ave. to Archibald Ave. (17,500 linear feet) S
treet Improvements
• U ltimate Improvement Plans: 160’ ultimate R/W width / 130’ curb-curb roadway width with 26’ landscaped median; 4 travel lanes in each direction
• C onstruction Plans: Initial construction phase without last-lane improvements to include 3 travel lanes in each direction omitting future outer lane, curb/gutter/sidewalk and parkway improvements • I ncludes traffic signals, signing, striping, and if required by traffic study – bicycle lane striping/pavement markings; and schematic layout of street lights only Domestic Water Improvements
• O RR from Euclid Ave. to Bon View Ave.; from Grove Ave. to west of Cucamonga Channel Recycled Water Improvements
• O RR from Euclid Ave. to west of Cucamonga Channel
Sewer Improvements
• S ewer Study of potential east-west public sewer improvements along the ORR corridor EXHIBIT "C"
231
Mr. Jeffrey Tang
August 13, 2026

Page 2 ends

2 Storm Drain Improvements
• M aster-planned drainage facilities within ORR from Euclid Ave. to Archibald Ave.

Hydrology/Drainage Studies
• O ffsite Hydrology Analysis, Roadway Hydrology, Conceptual Drainage/WQP, Hydrology/Hydraulic Report, WQMP
(Note certain optional services are listed in WLG’s scope that may be added to our proposal subject to OMUC and the City agreeing to the inclusion of those optional services in the future.) Ontario Ranch Road Bridge – Phase 2
• S tructural bridge plans
Harris will include DCEG as a subconsultant Harris to provide the scope of services identified in their August 11, 2026, proposal. It is our understanding that DCEG will be added to our team via this proposal and the associated City amendment to our on-call agreement with the City. DCEG will provide the following scope of review: Evaluate the bridge design documents to identify potential construction issues, assess site conditions and access, analyze construction methods and sequencing, review specifications for clarity and feasibility, identifying potential cost and schedule risks, suggest design modifications to improve buildability, and provide recommendations to optimize the project for efficient construction, all with the goal of minimizing change orders and delays during the construction phase. It is understood that a formal third-party structural engineering review is not contemplated by DCEG’s review.

ORR Deliverables:
• P reliminary Design Report (30%), Technical Memorandum and Reports • 6 0% Design Submittal (Ultimate Improvement)
• 6 0% Design Submittal (Interim Construction)
• 9 0% Design Submittal (Ultimate Improvement)
• 9 0% Design Submittal (Interim Construction)
• 1 00% Design Submittal (Ultimate Improvement)
• 1 00% Design Submittal (Interim Construction)
A schedule was not provided for Ontario Ranch Road in the WLG document provided to us. 232
Mr. Jeffrey Tang
August 13, 2026

Page 3 ends

3 Ardurra identified the following for Grove Avenue:

Grove Avenue: Riverside Ave. to Eucalyptus Ave. (2 miles)

Roadway Improvement Plans (curb-curb only)
• (Assumed Master Planned Ultimate Improvements as Other Principal Arterial):
124’ ultimate R/W width / 84’ curb-curb roadway width with 28’ landscaped median; 2 travel lanes in each direction
• Construction Plans: Initial construction phase without last-lane improvements to include 1 travel lane in each direction omitting future outer lane, curb/gutter/sidewalk and parkway improvements Drainage Improvement Plans
• Master-planned drainage facilities within Grove Avenue from Ontario Ranch Road to Eucalyptus Ave. (the segment north of Ontario Ranch Road is subject to SBCFC review/approval) Traffic Signal Plans
• Three traffic signals at unspecified intersections along the corridor, and 1 temporary traffic signal design at Grove Ave./Riverside Ave.

Signing and Striping Plans
• Signing / striping plans along the corridor
Street Light Plans
• Street light plans along the corridor
Fiber Broadband Plans
• Fiber broadband plans along the corridor
Landscape Plans
• Median landscape plans along the corridor
Sewer Improvement Plans
• Public sewer system improvements along the corridor
Water Improvement Plans
• Public water system improvements along the corridor
Recycled Water Improvement Plans
• Public recycled water system improvements along the corridor Structural Plans
• Large diameter piping (Below grade), modifications to existing retaining wall adjacent to existing detention pond southeast of Riverside Drive, and up to 1,000 LF of retaining walls (up to 6’ height). *Note Harris is excluding structural engineering review services of Ardurra’s plans from this proposal, and it is our understanding these plans will be reviewed through the City’s internal plan check process.

Grove Avenue Deliverables:
• Preliminary Design (30%) / Tech Memos
• 60% Design Submittal (Ultimate Improvement)
• 90% Design Submittal (Ultimate Improvement)
• 100% Design Submittal (Ultimate Improvement)
• 60% Design Submittal (Interim Construction)
• 100% Design Submittal (Interim Construction)
233
Mr. Jeffrey Tang
August 13, 2026

Page 4 ends

4 Ardurra identified the following schedule for Grove Avenue:

• 10/27/26: Delivery of Draft Technical Memos
• 10/28/26 to 11/18/26: 15 Day City Review **
• 3/2/27: Submit PDR / 30% Plans
• 3/3/27 to 3/16/27: 10 Day City Review **
• 4/23/27: Submit Final PDR / Final 30% Plans
• 5/26/27: Submit 60% Plans
• 5/27/27 to 6/17/27: 15 Day City Review **
• 7/28/27: Submit 90% Plans
• 7/29/27 to 8/11/27: 10 Day City Review **
• 9/21/27: Submit 100% Plans
• 10/20/27: Submit 60% Interim Plans
• 10/21/27 to 11/3/27: 10 Day City Review **
• 12/14/27: Submit 100% Interim Plans
• 12/15/27 to 12/28/27: 10 Day City Review **

234
Mr. Jeffrey Tang
August 13, 2026

Page 5 ends

5 Proposed Plan Check Fee Estimate

Our effort for plan check services is generally developed in accordance with the estimated construction costs associated with the public improvements. As the public improvement quantities and costs are unknown at this time, we developed a preliminary construction cost estimate for the various public improvements using geometric assumptions for the full-width corridor improvements and generally understood City standards for utility infrastructure improvements. Enclosed herewith is the full spreadsheet we have developed documenting our preliminary estimate of the value of the anticipated public improvements and summarized below.

Our proposal is contingent on the understanding that our preliminary estimate of the quantities of the public improvements may be refined and updated with each milestone submittal made by WLG and Ardurra, and that this proposal may be subject to revision based on future revalidation of their respective quantities developed with the updated infrastructure improvement plans.

Based on the preliminary estimates shown above, the City’s plan check fee – and corresponding Harris plan check fee at 70% of the City fee – is summarized below.

We propose an initial estimated plan check fee of $1,577,942 for review of the full width ultimate street improvement plans and associated infrastructure plans based on our very preliminary estimate of the quantities of public improvements.

A. ONTARIO RANCH ROAD (WestLAND Group) - 17,500 LF
Street $25,512,500
Potable Water $3,893,541
Recycled Water $3,895,761
Sanitary Sewer (analysis / tech memo only - no plans) - Storm Drain $3,857,529
Street Lighting $1,660,443
Fiber Optic $1,111,067
Subtotal - Ontario Ranch Road $39,930,841
B. GROVE AVENUE (Ardurra) - 10,560 LF (2.0 miles)
Street (incl. landscape, street lighting, fiber optic) $13,312,970 Potable Water $1,917,107
Recycled Water $2,053,246
Sanitary Sewer $1,672,169
Storm Drain $3,384,445
Subtotal - Grove Avenue $22,339,937
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST - BASE SCOPE $62,270,778 A. Ontario Ranch Road
Estimated value of public improvements $39,930,841
City plan check fee $1,445,496
Harris plan check fee (70% of City plan check fee) $ 1,011,848 B. Grove Avenue
Estimated value of public improvements $22,339,937
City plan check fee $808,706
Harris plan check fee (70% of City plan check fee) $ 566,094 C. Combined program
Estimated value of public improvements $62,270,778
City plan check fee $2,254,202
HA RRIS PLAN CHECK FEE - PROPOSED $1,577,942
235
Mr. Jeffrey Tang
August 13, 2026

Page 6 ends

6 Constructability review of the Ontario Ranch Road Bridge (Phase 2) performed by DCEG:
• DCEG T&M NTE fee: $34,120
• Harris 10% Mark-Up: $3,412
• Total: $37,352

To the extent that the City requests Harris to review subsequent construction phase “Interim” improvement plans, where the ultimate street improvement plans are reconfigured to eliminate the outer right lane and parkway improvements, we have also prepared a preliminary estimate of the quantities of the interim street improvements. Considering our prior review of the ultimate street improvement plans, we propose a 75% discounted plan review fee (equal to 25% of the regular plan review fee). Based on the preliminary quantities, and the corresponding City plan check fee we propose a discounted 25% supplemental plan check fee of $206,750 for review of the reconfigured Interim street improvement plans as summarized below.

As the plans are submitted with each milestone, a revalidation of the assumed quantities of the public improvements included herein may be completed, and an update to the City plan check fee and corresponding Harris plan check fee may be submitted to the City for consideration and review as an amendment to this proposal.

Additionally, the WLG and Ardurra scopes of work identify an estimated 56 parcels of rights-of-way that may be required. Accordingly, we have included the corresponding Harris easement/deed review fee of $2,800 per document for a total of $156,800 as shown below (based on 70% of the City plan check fee of $4,000 per document).

Separate street improvement valuation excluding the last right-hand lane in each direction and the cur b and gutter improvements in each direction. Street improvements only.

A . Ontario Ranch Road (Interim)
Estimated value of public improvements $21,659,551
City plan check fee $784,076
Harris plan check fee (70% of City plan check fee) $548,853 Discounted Harris plan check fee @ 25% $137,213
B. Grove A venue (Interim)
Estimated value of public improvements $10,976,543
City plan check fee $397,351
Harris plan check fee (70% of City plan check fee) $278,146 Discounted Harris plan check fee @ 25% $69,536
C. Combined program (Interim Street Plans)
Estimated value of public improvements $32,636,094
City plan check fee $1,181,427
Harris plan check fee (70% of City plan check fee) $ 826,999 HARRIS PLA N CHECK FEE @ 25% - PROPOSED $206,750
Corridor No. of Descriptions City Fee
Harris Fee @
70% Source
Ontario Ranch Road (WestLAND Group) 25 $100,000 $70,000 WLG scope:
approx. 25
parcels
Grove Avenue (Ardurra) 31 $124,000 $86,800 Ardurra scope:
31 parcels
Total - ROW description review / plan check 56 $224,000 $156,800 236
Mr. Jeffrey Tang
August 13, 2026

Page 7 ends

7 The WLG and Ardurra scopes of work identify several technical memoranda and studies that will require peer review. We have evaluated the types of memoranda and studies to be developed and have excluded most of them from our review with our understanding they are normally reviewed by OMUC or the City based on our previous experience. Our assumption is that Harris will peer review the following technical memoranda:
• Ontario Ranch Road – Hydrology and Hydraulic Report (ORR); Preliminary Engineer’s Cost Estimate; Preliminary Design Report (30%)
• Grove Avenue – Construction Cost Analysis; Right of Way Assessment; Hydraulic Analysis (Storm Drain); Opinion of Probable Construction Cost; Preliminary Design Report (30%)

We have estimated the number of hours associated with our review (see detailed backup assumptions in the enclosed spreadsheet). Accordingly, we have included our T&M estimate of $150,030 based on 2026/2027 Harris billing rates summarized below.

Finally, the WLG scope for Ontario Ranch Road references optional infrastructure improvement plans associated with sewer lines located in Euclid Ave., Sultana Ave., Campus Ave., Walker Ave., and Baker Ave. generally between Eucalyptus Ave. and Ontario Ranch Road. Also identified as optional infrastructure improvement plans are master-planned storm drain lines in Euclid Ave., Campus Ave., Bon View Ave., Walker Ave., and Hellman Ave. generally located between Eucalyptus Ave. and Ontario Ranch Road. We have developed a very preliminary estimate of the value of the optional sewer and storm drain improvements as shown below.

We propose an initial estimated optional plan check fee of $266,098 for review of these optional infrastructure plans based on our very preliminary estimate of the quantities of public improvements.

If authorized, as the quantities for these optional public improvements are submitted with each milestone, a revalidation of the quantities of the public improvements may be completed, and an update to the City plan check fee and corresponding Harris plan check fee (at 70%) may be submitted to the City for consideration and review as an amendment to this proposal.

Ontario Ranch Road - technical memoranda and reports $73,039 Grove Avenue - technical memoranda and reports $76,9 91 Harris T&M estimate - base scope (billed as incurred) $150,030 Total estimated hours 638
City fee schedule: 'Misc. / Special Technical Repor t Review Fee - Actual Cost at contract hourly rates.

Optional Scope Item Estimated Value
City Fee @

3.62%
Harris Fee @
70%
ORR - Optional sanitary sewer (15" VCP, 6 side
streets, Eucalyptus to ORR) $2,237,331 $80,991 $56,694
ORR - Optional storm drain (Euclid 102", Campus
60", Bon View 96", Walker 108", Hellman 11'x6' RCB) $8,263,774 $299,149 $209,404 Subtotal - optional scope (if all tasks authorized) $10,501,104 $380,140 $266,098 237
Mr. Jeffrey Tang
August 13, 2026

Page 8 ends

8 Summary

In summary, we propose an initial estimate of $2,394,972 for the following plan check fees for review of the various deliverables identified herein for the Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue corridor improvements:

Assumptions/Exclusions
• Fee covers plan check of the deliverables identified in the WestLAND Group ORR scope and the Ardurra Grove Avenue scope: technical memoranda / preliminary design reports (as listed in the enclosed detail assumptions), 30% PDR, and 60% / 90% / 100% submittal for the ultimate construction sets – except as specifically excluded herein.
• Fee assumes the plan check cycle is an iterative coordinated process in collaboration with the Engineer of Work and their respective submittal milestone (30% PDR/60%/90%/100%). Submittal of subsequent milestone deliverables that are deemed incomplete or non-responsive to plan check comments are subject to additional plan check fees.
• Our initial estimate of public improvements is a planning-level (Class 4) estimate developed from the published unit cost schedule and the scopes of work. Our initial estimate will be reconciled against the Engineer of Work's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost at the 30% PDR / 60% / 90% / 100% milestone, and the corresponding plan check fee adjusted accordingly.
• Except for the constructability review services performed by DCEG of the Ontario Ranch Road Bridge (Phase 2) structural plans, structural reviews are excluded and performed by others. • Right-of-way description review is billed per legal description submitted, at the Harris fee of $2,800. Estimate is based on Scopes of Work provided; Harris will bill only descriptions submitted. Descriptions requiring more than two review cycles are billable as additional services. • Technical memoranda and special technical report review is limited to those reports not otherwise identified as excluded on the enclosed Table, and is billed time and materials at actual cost against the estimated budget; to the extent actual hours may exceed estimated hours, Harris reserves the right to request additional budget with reasonable justification therefore. • Technical report review of Cucamonga Creek hydraulic analysis / hydraulic report is excluded and performed by others subject to SBCFCD review.
• Traffic study, regional traffic analysis and environmental clearance review are excluded and performed by others.
• Utility pole relocation and undergrounding plan review is excluded and performed by others.

Ultimate Improvement Street/Infrastructure Plans $1, 577,942 Ontario Ranch Road Bridge (Phase 2) Constructability Review $37,352 Interim Sstreet Improvement Plan Check $206,750
ROW Description Review $156,800
Technical memoranda / special technical report review $150,030 Optional Sewer / Storm Drain Plan Check $266,098
TOTAL PROPOSED HARRIS FEE - BASE SCOPE $2,394,972

TOTAL PROPOSED HARRIS FEE
238
Mr. Jeffrey Tang
August 13, 2026

Page 9 ends

9 Payments

Our on-call contract generally has a 2-milestone billing frequency on typical plan check assignments, with 75% upon Plan Check 1, and 25% upon final approval of the item. Given that the plan check services provided hereunder are City initiated, and involve an iterative milestone submittal process, we request consideration of an alternative billing and payment frequency based on the various milestone submittals by WLG and Ardurra, as follows:

Ontario Ranch Road (WLG)
• Ultimate Improvement Plans may be billed at 25% increments corresponding to the 30% / 60% / 90% / and 100% (Final) milestone submittals
• Interim Construction Plans may be billed at 33% increments corresponding to the 60% / 90% / 100% (Final) milestone submittals

Grove Avenue (Ardurra)
• Ultimate Improvement Plans may be billed at 25% increments corresponding to the 30% / 60% / 90% / and 100% (Final) milestone submittals
• Interim Construction Plans may be billed at 50% increments corresponding to the 60% / 100% (Final) milestone submittals

Right of Way Documents
Review of legal descriptions/exhibits associated with various parcels of right-of-way acquisition are anticipated to be reviewed in a 2-cycle process and may be billed at 50% increments corresponding to Plan Check 1 and Plan Check 2.

Technical Report Review
Time and material basis reviews of various technical reports may be billed on a monthly basis for the actual hours incurred in the review in the preceding month.

We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to continue providing these important peer review and plan check services to the City of Ontario on this important City-initiated infrastructure improvement project for the Ontario Ranch West development area. If you have any questions regarding our assumptions and approach to developing our plan check fee proposal, please let us know.

Best regards,

Marcus Fuller, PE, PLS, MPA
Vice President – Engineering
760.217.3460 | [email protected]

Enclosures
Summary Fee Table, Ontario Ranch Road Estimate, Grove Avenue Estimate, Technical Memoranda Review Assumptions
239
46700.00100\33287662.1
PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR

DEBRA PORADA

MAYOR PRO TEM
ALAN D. WAPNER
JIM W. BOWMAN

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK
JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND

MOOTE COMPANIES, LLC

1. Parties and Date.

This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (as defined herein) is made and entered as of ____________, by and between the City of Ontario (“City”) and Moote Companies, LLC, a California Corporation, “Consultant”. City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. Recitals.

2.1 Agreement. The City and Consultant have entered into an agreement entitled “D&C22-19 On-Call Project Management Services” dated April 4, 2023 (“Agreement”).

2.2 Amendment Purpose. The City and Consultant desire to amend this Agreement to increase the compensation by Ten million three hundred fifty-nine thousand eight hundred seventy-five dollars ($10,359,875) for a total-not-to-exceed compensation of Ten million four hundred fifty-nine thousand eight hundred seventy-five dollars ($10,459,875), include additional project specific proposal to Exhibit B, and extend the time of performance to March 31, 2028. This increase in compensation is for the additional scope of work listed in the attached Consultants’ Proposal titled “Proposal for Cost Estimating, Scheduling, Bid Support, Project Management & Construction Management Services — Ontario Ranch West: Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue Improvements (Ref. SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26)” and dated August 7, 2026.

2.3 Amendment Authority. This Amendment No. 1 is authorized pursuant to Section

3.1.2 and 3.2.4 of the Agreement.

3. Terms.
240
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 2 of 5 ends

BB&K 2020

3.1 Amendment. Sections 3.1.2 and 3.2.1, Exhibit B through Exhibit C of the Agreement are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows:

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from April 4, 2023 to March 31, 2028, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if necessary to complete the Services.

3.2.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed Ten million four hundred fifty-nine thousand eight hundred seventy- five dollars ($10,459,875) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

Exhibit “B” - SCEDULE OF SERVICES is hereby amended to add Attachment B which is hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All other previously added or deleted scope of services are retained in their entirety.

Exhibit “C” – COMPENSATION is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Attachment C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

241
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 3 of 5 ends

BB&K 2020

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO

AND MOOTE COMPANIES, LLC

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment No. 1 as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ONTARIO MOOTE COMPANIES, LLC
By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]

Approved By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
Approved as to Form:

_____________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

Attested By:

City Clerk

242
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 4 of 5 ends

BB&K 2020

Attachment B

Exhibit “B” – SCHEDULE OF SERVICES

243
60 Corporate Park, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92606
(949) 428-1400
www.moote.com
Land Development & Infrastructure Consultants
August 7, 2026
Omar Gonzalez, Principal Engineer
Ontario Municipal Utilities Company / City of Ontario
1333 S. Bon View Avenue
Ontario, CA 91761
Re: Proposal for Cost Estimating, Scheduling, Bid Support, Project Management & Construction Management Services — Ontario Ranch West: Ontario Ranch Road, Grove Avenue, and Chino / Vineyard Sewer (Ref. SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26)
Dear Mr. Gonzalez:

Pursuant to the City's request and the draft Scope of Work dated June 23, 2026 (SOW 1.2), Moote Companies is pleased to submit this proposal to serve as the City's Owner's Representative for the Ontario Ranch West corridor improvements. Since 1974, Moote has provided cost estimating, public and private bidding, project management and construction management services on more than 7,500 projects throughout California, including extensive work within the Inland Empire and Ontario Ranch.

Our proposal is organized around four core services — Cost Estimating, Bid Support, Project Management, and Construction Management — and draws on extensive experience delivering public infrastructure within the City of Ontario and Ontario Ranch, including DIF-eligible improvements procured under public contracting guidelines. It was prepared without the benefit of plans or exhibits; the package structure, durations, and staffing levels presented herein are the product of Moote's own analysis of the Scope of Work, documented in Sections 2 and 5 so the City can see precisely what we assumed and where those assumptions are most likely to move.

Ontario Ranch West is familiar ground for Moote. We are currently delivering the Merrill Commerce Center backbone program in Ontario alongside Westland, the City’s Engineer of Record for Ontario Ranch Road, and over the past decade have managed approximately $300 million of Ontario Ranch backbone infrastructure — the same corridors, purveyors, agencies, and standards this program will run through — from first estimate through final acceptance and DIF reimbursement.

We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to serving as an extension of City staff on this landmark program.

Sincerely,
Eric Nutter
Principal
[email protected] | 714-925-2011
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 1 244

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Project Understanding........................................................................................................................... 3

2. Basis of Proposal.................................................................................................................................... 4

3. Scope of Services.................................................................................................................................... 6

4. Anticipated Bid Packages..................................................................................................................... 11

5. Preliminary Program Schedule............................................................................................................ 13

6. Project Team and Rate Schedule......................................................................................................... 16

7. Qualifications and References............................................................................................................. 17

8. Fee Proposal......................................................................................................................................... 20

9. Assumptions and Exclusions................................................................................................................ 26

10. Payment Terms and Acceptance....................................................................................................... 27 Exhibit A — Assumed Infrastructure by Discipline (Sheets A-1 to A-6)...................................................... 29 Exhibit B — Preliminary Program Schedule
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 2 245

1. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Ontario is implementing the ultimate widening and master-planned backbone infrastructure for two arterial corridors serving Ontario Ranch West:
 Edison Avenue / Ontario Ranch Road (ORR) — Euclid Avenue to Archibald Avenue (±3.3 miles): 160' right-of-way, 130' curb-to-curb, eight lanes with a 26' landscaped median. Design is sole-sourced to Westland, including the entirety of the ORR / Grove intersection. Moote and Westland are currently delivering the Merrill Commerce Center offsite backbone program together in Ontario (see Section 7).
 Grove Avenue — Riverside Drive to Eucalyptus Avenue (±2.0 miles): 124' right-of-way, 84' curb-to- curb, four lanes with a 28' landscaped median. Design is sole-sourced to Ardurra.  Chino Avenue and Vineyard Avenue Sanitary Sewer (±1.5 miles): approximately 1.5 miles of 21-inch VCP sanitary sewer — Chino Avenue from Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue (±1.0 mile) and Vineyard Avenue from Chino Avenue to Riverside Drive (±0.5 mile) — added to the program by City direction subsequent to SOW 1.2. The City only needs project management and construction management services for this added sewer and it is sequenced ahead of the two arterial corridors.

Key elements of the program, per SOW 1.2, include:
 Two plan sets for the roadway improvements — an ultimate set (full width to curb and gutter, supporting SCE pole relocation and parkway improvements) and a construction set excluding last- lane construction. Streetlights and fiber optic are optional tasks tied to a potential last-lane directive.
 Concrete intersections designed per TOP Mobility truck routes (generally east/west along ORR), and potential full intersection improvements at ORR / Euclid requiring a cooperative funding agreement with the City of Chino.
 The westbound half of the ORR / Cucamonga Channel bridge, with SBCFCD and/or USACE coordination.
 Master-planned wet utilities: domestic water (925 PZ on ORR including the Euclid loop; 1010 PZ on Grove), sanitary sewer (full length of Grove; ORR conveyance dependent on the north/south segment design to Eucalyptus), recycled water (new main for the full length of ORR; 930/1050 PZ on Grove), and storm drain (hydraulic continuity with downstream segments, interim “leave dry” facilities, and the Grove gap between ORR and Eucalyptus, coordinated with the SBCFCD Grove Avenue Basin project). See Exhibit A for the infrastructure assumed in this proposal.  Dry utility relocations — undergrounding of SCE facilities up to 34.5 kV, relocation of facilities above

34.5 kV to ultimate locations, undergrounding of cable television and telecommunications, and coordination with SoCal Gas, Kinder Morgan, and Zenith.  Traffic signals (assumed four on ORR and three on Grove) and signing and striping designed by the Engineers of Record based on a third-party Regional Traffic Analysis managed by Public Works.  Environmental compliance under adopted master plans and the TOP exemption, with cultural resources mitigation, biological and cultural surveys, and tribal consultation; right-of-way assessment, appraisal, acquisition, and construction and permanent easements.  Extensive agency and stakeholder coordination: City of Ontario, City of Chino, County of San Bernardino, SBCFCD, USACE, IEUA, OMUC, SCE, gas, telecommunications, Kinder Morgan, Zenith, developers, property owners, and regional transportation agencies.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 3 246
The City will hold the design contracts with the Engineers of Record and the construction contracts with the successful bidders — in each case the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Moote's role is that of the City's Owner's Representative: providing independent cost estimating at each design milestone, program budgeting and master scheduling, public bid administration for each package of work, project management, construction management, and complete project documentation from pre-construction through closeout. Construction support services by the Engineers of Record will be provided under separate contracts and are not part of this proposal.

2. BASIS OF PROPOSAL
Moote believes the City is best served by a proposal that states plainly what it is built on. The following is offered in that spirit.

Information Available at the Time of Proposal
The scope documentation available to Moote in preparing this proposal was the five-page draft Scope of Work (SOW 1.2, dated June 23, 2026), together with the City’s subsequent direction to add the Chino Avenue and Vineyard Avenue sanitary sewer. No plans, exhibits, plan and profile sheets, alignments, invert depths, pipe diameters, materials, structural sections, or right-of-way exhibits were available for review.

Accordingly, the anticipated bid package structure, estimating hours, construction durations, staffing levels, and program duration presented in this proposal are Moote's independent professional judgment, developed from the written scope and from our direct experience delivering comparable backbone infrastructure within Ontario Ranch and the Inland Empire. They are not derived from a review of design documents, because none exist at this time.

Re-Validation at the 30% / PDR Milestone
Moote will re-validate the bid package count, program duration, and fee at the 30% / PDR design milestone, when the corridor limits, utility alignments, depths, and materials are first defined. Should the package count, corridor limits, or program duration change materially from the assumptions stated herein, Moote will bring that to the City's attention in writing at that milestone and address it by amendment at the rates contained in this proposal. Moote will not seek an adjustment for refinements that fall within the assumptions stated below.

Scope Elements Most Likely to Affect Fee and Duration
 Chino / Vineyard Sanitary Sewer — carried at approximately 1.5 miles of 21-inch VCP at an assumed production rate of 50 linear feet per working day for the full length, yielding 159 working days. No plans, alignments, invert depths, or geotechnical data were available. Depth, dewatering, shoring, pipe-zone backfill and cure requirements, trenchless crossings, and traffic control restrictions are the variables most likely to move this duration; a material change will be brought to the City in writing at the 30% / PDR milestone.
 ORR Sanitary Sewer — no scope is currently defined. The north/south conveyance alignment to Eucalyptus governs whether an ORR sewer package exists at all. Excluded from the base fee and carried under the Task 5 Reserve.
 Streetlights and Fiber Optic — optional packages dependent on a City last-lane directive. Excluded from the base fee and carried under the Task 5 Reserve.  ORR / Euclid Intersection — extent of improvements is contingent on the cooperative funding agreement with the City of Chino. Sequenced late in the program for that reason.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 4 247
 Euclid / ORR Traffic Signal — no modification of the existing traffic signal at Euclid / ORR is included in the base scope. Should the City direct a signal modification, it would be added as a bid package under the Task 5 Reserve process.
 Traffic Signal Interconnect — traffic signals are assumed not to require fiber optic interconnect.

Fiber optic remains an optional package tied to a City last-lane directive and is excluded from the base fee.
 ORR Storm Drain — carried as a 125-working-day allowance. Actual scope, alignment, and hydraulic continuity with downstream segments are undefined.
 Right-of-Way — the program schedule assumes all proposed right-of-way is acquired or dedicated in time to permit construction in the sequence shown.
 Traffic Control and Phasing — final phasing will be governed by what the City will permit through traffic control approvals, which directly drives construction duration.

Moote would welcome the opportunity to refine this proposal once plans or exhibits become available.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 5 248

3. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 — Cost Estimating & Master Schedule
 Prepare independent infrastructure cost estimates for each plan set at each design milestone — PDR/30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% submittals.
 Produce Bluebeam exhibits with each update confirming the scope of work and quantities.  Provide independent review of the last-lane improvements cost analysis technical memorandum to support the City's go / no-go decision.
 Reconcile estimates at each PDR/30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% submittal; identify scope gaps, quantity discrepancies, and cost drivers.
 Develop and maintain the overall program budget, including per-package budgets, contingency tracking, and cash-flow projections for CIP / DIF programming.  Develop and maintain the master schedule, sequencing design, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, bidding, and construction across all packages to maximize corridor continuity and minimize re-mobilization.
 Perform independent constructability review of plan sets at each design milestone, per SOW 1.2's independent-party requirement, including review of the ultimate versus construction-set split for gaps, overlaps, and re-biddability.
 Provide recommendations on bid package structure and contracting strategy, packaged by trade, corridor, and schedule readiness.

Task 2 — Public and Private Bid Administration and Bid Support Moote will provide public or private bid administration for the City in accordance with public contracting guidelines. Services are provided for each separate bid package / plan set and include:
 Preparation of project-specific Bid Proposal and Specifications; incorporation of the City's subcontractor agreement, Invitation to Bid, Special Conditions, Bid Proposal forms, and Contract Price Schedule (Excel format) with line items and final bidding quantities.  Colored take-off exhibits defining each package's limits of work, with scope review by the City prior to advertisement (if required).
 Bidder outreach and prequalification, and active promotion of competition among qualified contractors.
 Public advertisement per agency guidelines; coordination of pre-bid meetings, job walks, bidder RFIs, and addenda with the Engineers of Record during the bid period.  Public bid opening; validation of each bidder's bid package to confirm all required documents were submitted (bonds, DIR registration, addenda acknowledgment, and similar) and that no mathematical errors exist; bid tabulation and bid spread analysis; reference checks; and a written award recommendation.
 Final contract package provided to the City for award. The lowest responsive, responsible bidder's contract documents will be provided to the City to proceed with contracting, including exhibits, detailed construction schedule, T&M rate sheet, and contractor qualification documents.  Hand-off meeting with the City and the construction management team, with colored exhibits, contractor contacts, and schedule.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 6 249
 Coordination with the City to produce a letter of intent authorizing the prime contractor to begin producing material submittals — particularly long-lead materials — for review and approval during the contracting process.

Task 3 — Project Management
Pre-Construction
 Assist in registering each project with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and provide the prime contractor with the DIR number so that the prime and its subcontractors can upload certified payroll directly.
 Process all material submittals with the Engineer of Record and the public agency, maintaining an updated submittal log documenting the status of each.
 Coordinate with the prime contractor to confirm it holds all documentation required to be added to the City's encroachment permit, and assist in providing that documentation to the Engineering Department.
 Coordinate, schedule, and conduct the pre-construction meeting with all related agencies, consultants, and contractors.
 Establish procedures with the project team for preparing and processing project documentation, including plan logs, submittal logs, RFI logs, COR logs, and pay applications.  Conduct weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly meetings with the project team as needed.

During Construction
 Enforce compliance with the executed contract, the bid specifications, and the Greenbook where applicable.
 Review, process, and obtain Engineer of Record and agency approval of all Requests for Information.  Administer change orders — review for validity, confirm scope, quantities, and credits, and negotiate with the prime contractor prior to submitting to the City for formal review and approval.  Administer monthly invoices — review with the on-site management team, establish quantities, obtain lien releases, and review prior to City processing.  Collect and document certified payroll reports on a monthly basis.  Identify constructability issues and coordinate with the design and construction teams on solutions.  Serve as the City's single point of contact for all construction-related matters, resolving field issues, coordinating between the Engineers of Record, contractors, agencies, and utility purveyors, and driving open questions to closure so that field progress is not interrupted.  Conduct weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly meetings with the project team, communicating construction status, budget, schedule, and risk.
 Update the master project schedule on a monthly basis.

Post-Construction
 Work with the agency to establish the punch list and coordinate with the prime contractor to schedule and complete punch list items.
 Facilitate as-built plan approval and processing with the Engineer of Record and the agency.  Obtain unconditional final lien releases and final certified payroll reports.  Assist in filing the Notice of Completion with the County.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 7 250
 Track and obtain the Letter of Acceptance from the agency.  Conduct closeout meetings with the project team as needed.

Task 4 — Construction Management
 Provide qualified construction management staff to schedule, coordinate, and expedite the work of all trades and utility companies associated with the contracted scope of work.  Conduct pre-construction conferences with the City, public agencies, utility companies, design engineers, and contractors.
 Maintain daily written job reports and photographic documentation, communicate daily with the City, and attend meetings as required.
 Verify and field-approve invoice quantities for monthly progress payments, and recommend approval or disapproval of change orders and extra work authorizations.  Coordinate field survey, geotechnical observation and materials testing (by others), and special mitigations related to field conditions.
 Maintain excellent public relations with residents and business owners adjacent to the work, and coordinate traffic control and access.
 Maintain a red-lined set of construction prints reflecting field changes, with formal as-built drawings prepared by the contractor.
 Resolve disputes with contractors regarding interpretation of plans and specifications, progress, or adequacy of performance, and provide continuous consultation to the City on job problems, schedules, and costs.
 Assist the City in obtaining approval and acceptance by agencies having jurisdiction over the various work elements.

The Construction Manager is not responsible for controlling the contractors' construction means or methods, and does not replace City inspection of record or specialty inspection.

Basis of Compensation
All Moote services are priced from the Moote time-and-materials rate schedule in Section 6, at the rate in effect for the year in which the services are performed. Task 3 is invoiced on a time-and-materials basis at those rates for hours actually worked. Task 4 is invoiced as a monthly fixed fee built from the same rate schedule — each assigned position at its Section 6 hourly rate for the applicable year, at forty (40) hours per week for four (4) weeks — so the monthly fee is a full-time monthly rate for the field team actually deployed, and carries no lump sum, multiplier, or markup. Task 1 is invoiced on a time- and-materials basis at those same rates against an allowance, and Task 2 is a fixed fee per bid package.

Duration of Services and Extensions
Tasks 3 and 4 are scoped and budgeted for the sixty-four (64) month program duration presented in Section 5 and Exhibit B — April 2027 through July 2032 — which includes the twelve (12) month period added at the City’s request. Services required beyond that period, for reasons outside Moote’s control, are not included in the base fee and will be authorized by change order or contract amendment before they are performed, at the Section 6 rates in effect at the time the services are furnished. Moote will notify the City in writing in advance of any anticipated extension, with the projected duration and cost, so that the City can process the authorization without an interruption in services.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 8 251
Alternate Add Services
Safety Inspection Services
At the City's option, Moote will provide a dedicated Site Safety Manager for the duration of construction to monitor contractor safety-plan compliance, conduct site safety walks and documentation, enforce safety compliance, and coordinate incident reporting across all active contracts.  Conduct an initial site meeting with the superintendent and review any safety issues arising since the prior visit.
 Perform periodic jobsite safety audits and provide continuous safety oversight to maintain safe working conditions, striving for zero injuries to on-site workers and staff.  Assess the site for OSHA and Cal/OSHA compliance, confirm adequate and timely action is taken to correct hazards, and stop work when significant hazards are not corrected.  Meet with each contractor's and subcontractor's safety representatives and trade foremen present at the time of the visit to address issues, concerns, and assistance required.  Review contractors' written safety policies and procedures, Site-Specific Safety Plans (SSSPs), and IIPPs, and confirm required PPE is worn by all project personnel.  Conduct Job Hazard Analyses (JHAs) prior to the start of work and whenever conditions change, and confirm daily posting of the JHA at the jobsite entry for worker review and sign-off.  Confirm site-specific safety training is provided to all workers, including subcontractors, covering site-specific requirements, plans, and applicable regulations.  Confirm incident reporting procedures are in place and understood, and provide incident, accident, and near-miss reporting.
 Attend and support daily and monthly project safety meetings, including participation by subcontractor safety personnel, and track and document meetings, rosters, training, tailgate meetings, and inspection sheets.
 Provide fire watch monitors as needed or requested.
 Prepare and submit written reports detailing the findings and recommendations of each visit, and provide daily, weekly, and monthly project safety-status reports as the City requests.

Cost Reconciliation & Reimbursement Package
Final project documentation supporting DIF credits, developer reimbursements, and any cooperative- agreement true-ups (including the City of Chino), prepared to audit-ready standards. Each package includes:
 Review of the applicable agreement
 Table of contents and reimbursement summary
 Summary of direct costs, reconciled on an invoice-by-invoice basis  Copies of contracts and change orders, and a change order summary  Check and invoice summaries
 Unconditional final lien release listing
 Certified payroll listing
 Proof of public bid documentation
 Notice of Completion
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 9 252
 Review of supporting paperwork and correspondence
 Exhibits (vicinity map, location map, facility exhibits)  Delivery of the completed package to all parties
Prevailing Wage Compliance
At the City’s option, Moote will provide dedicated prevailing wage compliance services across all active construction contracts, invoiced on a time-and-materials basis at $100.00 per hour. Services include:
 Confirmation of prime contractor and subcontractor DIR registration and project registration.  Collection and audit of certified payroll reports against daily reports and the on-site workforce.  Collection of one-time and periodic labor compliance documentation required by applicable labor law.
 On-site worker interviews and resolution of discrepancies with the contractor.  Maintenance of audit-ready compliance files and support for responses to DIR and agency inquiries.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 10 253

4. ANTICIPATED BID PACKAGES
Based on SOW 1.2 and our independent packaging analysis, Moote anticipates eighteen (18) public bid packages across the two corridors, organized by corridor as follows:

Ontario Ranch Road (9 packages) Euclid Avenue (1 package) Grove Avenue (8 packages) Storm Drain Domestic Water — Eucalyptus to
ORR Sanitary Sewer
Domestic Water Storm Drain
Recycled Water Domestic Water
Dry Utilities Recycled Water
Traffic Signals (4) Dry Utilities
Streets Traffic Signals (3)
Landscape — Medians Streets
Bridge — Cucamonga Channel Landscape — Medians
ORR / Euclid Intersection
Currently undefined packages are excluded from the base fee and are carried under the Task 5 Reserve described in Section 8: ORR Sanitary Sewer (pending design of the north/south conveyance segments to Eucalyptus), Streetlights (optional — last-lane directive only), and Fiber Optic (optional — last-lane directive only).

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 11 254
Estimating Effort by Design Milestone
Separately from the package structure above, the following table presents the anticipated cost estimating effort for each bid package at each design milestone — PDR/30%, 60%, 90%, and 100%.

Hours shown are total estimating team hours per milestone estimate and support the Task 1 allowance of 765 hours in Section 8.

Bid Package PDR/30% 60% 90% 100% Total Hrs
ORR Storm Drain 20 16 12 12 60
ORR Domestic Water 8 8 8 8 32
ORR Recycled Water 8 6 6 6 26
ORR Dry Utilities 8 6 6 6 26
ORR Traffic Signals (4) 8 6 6 6 26
ORR Streets 24 20 20 20 84
ORR Landscape — Medians 4 3 3 3 13
ORR Bridge — Cucamonga Channel 40 20 20 20 100
ORR / Euclid Intersection 20 16 16 16 68
Euclid Domestic Water 8 6 6 6 26
Grove Sanitary Sewer 16 16 16 16 64
Grove Storm Drain 8 8 8 8 32
Grove Domestic Water 6 6 6 6 24
Grove Recycled Water 10 10 10 10 40
Grove Dry Utilities 10 10 10 10 40
Grove Traffic Signals (3) 6 6 6 6 24
Grove Streets 16 16 16 16 64
Grove Landscape — Medians 4 4 4 4 16
TOTAL ESTIMATING HOURS (18
packages) 224 183 179 179 765
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 12 255

5. PRELIMINARY PROGRAM SCHEDULE
To establish a defensible basis for the program duration reflected in our fee, Moote prepared a preliminary construction schedule for all corridors, including the Chino / Vineyard sanitary sewer added by City direction. It is attached as Exhibit B and summarized below.

The schedule is built from an assumed construction start of May 3, 2027 on the Chino / Vineyard sanitary sewer, with preconstruction beginning April 2027, and runs through July 2032 — a program duration of sixty-four (64) months, or 1,344 working days at 21 working days per month. That duration is the sum of the corridor durations outlined herein and the twelve (12) month period added at the City’s request. Per City direction, Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue are sequenced to begin in January 2028, following completion of the Chino / Vineyard sewer. The corridor durations are driven by the Ontario Ranch Road corridor, and specifically by the half-width bridge at the Cucamonga Channel, which is sequenced last because of SBCFCD and USACE permitting duration.

Corridor Summary
Corridor / Period Limits or Basis Length Window Working Days
Preconstruction
Submittals, permits, and
preconstruction meeting ahead of
the sewer start — Tasks 3 and 4 only
— Apr 2027 21
Chino Avenue Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue ±1.0 mi May 2027 – Sep 2027 106
Vineyard Avenue Chino Avenue to Riverside Drive ±0.5 mi Oct 2027 – Dec 2027 53
Ontario Ranch Road Euclid Ave to Archibald Ave ±3.3 mi Jan 2028 – Jul 2031 875
Euclid Avenue Eucalyptus Ave to ORR ±0.5 mi Oct 2028 – Jan 2029 60
Grove Avenue Riverside Dr to Eucalyptus Ave ±2.0 mi Jan 2028 – Feb 2030 530
City-Requested Extension Program-wide — per City direction, Tasks 3 and 4 only — Aug 2031 – Jul
2032 252
PROGRAM — 64 MONTHS
Corridor durations outlined herein
plus the twelve (12) month period
added at the City’s request
±7.3 mi Apr 2027 – Jul
2032 1,344
Working days shown for the individual corridors are production days for that corridor and overlap where corridors are built concurrently, so they do not sum to the program total. The program total of 1,344 working days is the sixty-four (64) month duration at 21 working days per month.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 13 256
Activity Durations
Activity Duration (Working Days)
CHINO AVENUE — Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue (±1.0 mile) Sanitary Sewer — 21" VCP, 5,280 LF 106
VINEYARD AVENUE — Chino Avenue to Riverside Drive (±0.5 mile) Sanitary Sewer — 21" VCP, 2,640 LF 53
ONTARIO RANCH ROAD — Euclid Avenue to Archibald Avenue (±3.3 miles) Storm Drain — miscellaneous scope, carried as allowance 125 Domestic Water — two headings 150
Recycled Water — two headings 150
Joint Trench / Dry Utilities 115
Streets — south half width plus one lane 300
Traffic Signals (4 each) 80
Euclid / ORR Intersection 91
Half-Width Bridge at Cucamonga Channel 225
Streets — existing half width plus one lane to ultimate 200 Median Street and Landscape / Irrigation 60
Sanitary Sewer TBD — no scope defined

EUCLID AVENUE
Domestic Water — Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR 60
GROVE AVENUE — Riverside Drive to Eucalyptus Avenue (±2.0 miles) Sanitary Sewer — Eucalyptus Avenue to Riverside Drive 225 Storm Drain — Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR 80
Domestic Water — Chino Avenue to Riverside Drive 35
Recycled Water — Eucalyptus Avenue to Riverside Drive 105 Joint Trench / Dry Utilities 70
Streets — full width, Eucalyptus Avenue to Riverside Drive 315 Traffic Signals (3 each) 60
Median Landscape / Irrigation 45
Sequencing Logic and Critical Drivers
 The Chino / Vineyard sanitary sewer is sequenced first, beginning May 2027, and is installed with a single dedicated crew running continuously from Grove Avenue east along Chino Avenue to Vineyard Avenue, then north along Vineyard Avenue to Riverside Drive. Per City direction, Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue is assumed to begin in January 2028, after the sewer is complete.  The Cucamonga Channel bridge governs the program end date and is sequenced last to allow for SBCFCD and USACE permitting.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 14 257
 The ORR / Euclid intersection is sequenced late because it is contingent on execution of a cost-share agreement with the City of Chino.
 A plug date is carried for completion of the SCE transmission line relocation, which gates widening of ORR to its ultimate section.
 On Grove, sanitary sewer is the lead activity and is scheduled with a single dedicated crew running continuously from Eucalyptus Avenue to Riverside Drive. Once that crew clears the Grove / ORR intersection, a separate storm drain crew mobilizes at Grove / Eucalyptus.  Joint trench must be among the first utilities installed in order to start the SCE removal clock; otherwise street construction is delayed or must be built around existing overhead poles.  Domestic water from Chino Avenue to Riverside Drive begins immediately upon sanitary sewer completion; Grove recycled water follows storm drain completion through ORR.

Schedule Assumptions
 No sanitary sewer is included on Ontario Ranch Road; the scope is currently undefined.  The Chino / Vineyard sanitary sewer is carried at 50 linear feet per working day for the full 1.5-mile length, with no separate allowance for mobilization, testing, restoration, paving, punch list, or weather; those activities are assumed to be absorbed within the production rate. No plans, alignments, invert depths, or geotechnical data were available.  The Chino / Vineyard sewer package is assumed to be publicly bid and awarded in time to support a May 2027 construction start, with preconstruction beginning April 2027.  Per City direction, Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue construction is assumed to begin January 2028, following completion of the Chino / Vineyard sanitary sewer. The two arterial corridors are not sequenced concurrently with the sewer.
 No streetlights or fiber optic are included in this Scope of Work.  Domestic water and recycled water are assumed not to conflict with existing overhead poles.  All proposed right-of-way is assumed to be acquired or dedicated in time to permit construction within the proposed right-of-way.
 East/west storm drain on ORR is carried as a 125-working-day allowance pending design.  Final phasing and schedule will ultimately be dictated by what the City permits through traffic control and phasing approvals.
 The overhead power poles adjacent to the proposed sanitary sewer alignment on Grove will require either jack-and-bore installation or completion of the Rule 20 joint trench first. If jack-and-bore is the selected method, the Engineer of Record should strategically locate the proposed sewer manholes far enough from the poles to accommodate jacking and receiving pits.

This schedule is preliminary and is offered to demonstrate the basis for the 64-month program duration. It will be replaced by a fully resource-loaded master schedule under Task 1 once design documents become available.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 15 258

6. PROJECT TEAM AND RATE SCHEDULE
Moote proposes the following key staff for this program:

Role Staff Commitment
Principal-in-Charge Eric Nutter 20 hrs/week through Dec 2027; 35 hrs/week thereafter
Senior Project Manager Emily Gorman 30 hrs/week through Dec 2027; full time thereafter
Senior Construction Manager Mike Magana Full time
Construction Manager Robert Thacker Full time
Assistant Construction Manager TBD Full time — as corridors require Moote’s time-and-materials rate schedule is set forth below. It runs from 2026 through 2032, which spans the sixty-four (64) month program duration presented in Section 5 and Exhibit B. Rates escalate three percent (3%) annually as shown, and that three percent (3%) annual escalation continues for each subsequent year for the life of the contract; Moote will furnish the City an updated rate schedule for any year beyond 2032 upon request. Hourly services are invoiced at the rate in effect at the time the services are performed, and the Task 4 monthly fixed fee is built from these same rates at forty (40) hours per week for four (4) weeks. Rates are fully burdened and include normal reproduction, mobile communications, and vehicle costs.

Classification (hourly) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Principal $215.00 $221.00 $228.00 $235.00 $242.00 $249.00 $257.00 Senior Project Manager $175.00 $180.00 $186.00 $191.00 $197.00 $203.00 $209.00 Senior Construction Manager $175.00 $180.00 $186.00 $191.00 $197.00 $203.00 $209.00 Estimator $165.00 $170.00 $175.00 $180.00 $186.00 $191.00 $197.00 Construction Manager $150.00 $155.00 $159.00 $164.00 $169.00 $174.00 $179.00 Project Administrator $145.00 $149.00 $154.00 $158.00 $163.00 $168.00 $173.00 Site Safety Manager $125.00 $129.00 $133.00 $137.00 $141.00 $145.00 $149.00 Assistant Construction
Manager $115.00 $118.00 $122.00 $126.00 $129.00 $133.00 $137.00 Prevailing Wage Compliance $100.00 $103.00 $106.00 $109.00 $113.00 $116.00 $119.00 Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 16 259

7. QUALIFICATIONS AND REFERENCES
The following qualifications are submitted in support of this proposal. Since 1974, Moote has provided cost estimating, public and private bidding, project management, and construction management services on more than 7,500 projects throughout California, including backbone infrastructure within the City of Ontario and Ontario Ranch.

Relevant Experience
Representative programs comparable in scope, contracting method, and agency environment to the Ontario Ranch West corridors are listed below. Moote has delivered approximately $300 million of offsite backbone infrastructure within the City of Ontario over the past ten years. Values are approximate and stated per Moote's project records. Two of these programs — Merrill Commerce Center and Ontario DC16 (final acceptance June 2026) — were delivered jointly with Westland (WLG), the City's Engineer of Record for the Ontario Ranch Road corridor. The City would begin this program with an Owner's Representative and a design team that have already delivered Ontario backbone infrastructure together.

Program Construction
Value Moote's Role Outcome
Merrill Commerce Center — offsite
backbone (Prologis), 2021–Present ~$200,000,000
Estimating, schedules,
public & private
bidding, PM, CM,
reimbursements — full
offsite backbone incl.

3.5 mi of 30' deep
sanitary sewer, ~4 mi
major storm drain,
domestic & recycled
water, streets, signals,
joint trench, fiber
optics; delivered jointly
with Westland (WLG)
as Engineer of Record
In progress —
approximately 6 months to
City acceptance
Ontario Commerce Center (Crow
Industrial), 2023–2025 ~$18,000,000
Estimating, schedules,
public & private
bidding, PM, CM, DIF
reimbursements —
storm drain, domestic
& recycled water, joint
trench, streetlights,
fiber optics, signals,
streets, landscape
Final acceptance received
2025
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 17 260
Esperanza — Bellegrave, Hamner,
Mill Creek & Eucalyptus (Lennar),
2017–2020
~$11,400,000
Estimating, schedules,
public bidding, PM,

CM, DIF
reimbursements —
sanitary sewer, storm
drain, domestic &
recycled water, signals,
streetlights, fiber
optics, streets
Delivered 2017–2020; DIF
reimbursements
administered
Colony Commerce Center West,
PM-19643 (CapRock Partners),
2019–2021
~$7,000,000
Estimating, schedules,
public bidding, PM,
CM, reimbursements
— sanitary sewer incl.
30' deep, storm drain,
domestic & recycled
water; streets incl.

Archibald Ave
Final acceptance received
Nov 2021
Grand Park — Archibald Ave &
Ontario Ranch Rd (Lennar), 2021–
2023
~$2,900,000
Estimating, schedules,
public bidding, PM,

CM, DIF
reimbursements —
traffic signal, streets,
landscape on the
Ontario Ranch Road
corridor
Delivered 2021–2023; DIF
reimbursements
administered
Key Personnel
The individuals below are the named team carried in the Task 3 and Task 4 staffing plans in Section 8.

Team composition will not change without City concurrence. Full resumes are available upon request.  Eric Nutter — Principal / Principal-in-Charge. Eric will direct the program, serve as the City’s primary point of contact, and lead cost estimating, bid administration, and program-level budget and schedule control, committed at a minimum of 30 hours per week for the program duration and budgeted at an average of 35 hours per week. Eric has been an integral part of Moote Companies since 2014, steadily advancing from Assistant Project Manager to Project Manager, Director of Operations, and now Principal. His leadership and expertise have been instrumental in the company’s continued success, particularly in large scale infrastructure development. Eric has had the privilege of working with some of the top industrial developers in Southern California managing the offsite infrastructure for over 20 million square feet of industrial space, totaling more than $300 million in offsite infrastructure improvements. Beyond project execution, Eric has played a crucial role in due diligence, public and private bidding processes, project and construction management, and post-construction reimbursements.
 Emily Gorman — Senior Project Manager. Emily will manage day-to-day project management across all concurrent bid packages under Task 3, including submittals, RFIs, change order administration, pay applications, certified payroll collection, and agency coordination, committed at thirty (30) hours per week during the initial Chino / Vineyard sanitary sewer phase and full time at forty (40) hours per week from program-wide mobilization in January 2028 forward. Emily brings ten Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 18 261
years of land development and construction experience across the Inland Empire, the last four with Moote Companies. She currently manages all the day to day project management duties at Prologis’s Merrill Commerce Center which consists of $200 million of offsite infrastructure. She recently completed the offsites for a 1.2 million square foot Good Year building, Ontario DC 16 offsites and the Ontario Ranch Business Park. Prior to Moote she managed entitlements, CEQA processing, and pre-construction on more than 3.5 million square feet of industrial development in Ontario, Moreno Valley and Jurupa Valley.
 Mike Magana — Senior Construction Manager. Mike will lead field construction management under Task 4, full time for the construction duration, including contractor scheduling and coordination, daily reporting and photographic documentation, quantity verification, and agency acceptance. Mike has been the lead Senior Construction Manager for Moote Companies on the Prologis Merrill Commerce Center project in Ontario since the inception of the project in 2021. Mike coordinates with all the prime contractor, subcontractors, Geotech’s, surveyors, inspectors, neighbors, homeowners, businesses and all other parties related to the project. He drives the schedule, identifies potential issues before they become a roadblock in the field. Prior to Moote Mike was a land development construction manager with Brookfield Properties where he managed some of Brookfields projects in the NMC and prior to that Mike was with Lennar and Cal Atlantic.

Mike is well versed in offsite land development infrastructure and his knowledge and experience is invaluable to a project of this size and magnitude, especially since he is the one who managed all the regional backbone infrastructure this project is tying into.  Robert Thacker — Construction Manager. Robert will provide full-time field construction management under Task 4 alongside the Senior Construction Manager, including daily job reports, red-lined field prints, traffic control coordination, and resident and business owner relations. Robert brings more than three decades of construction field experience, including twenty years as a forman and superintendent and over sixteen years in construction health and safety leadership on major Southern California programs including SoFi Stadium, the LAX Midfield Satellite Concourse, and UCLA. He has been on the Merrill Commerce Center backbone program in Ontario since its inception, providing site safety and construction management support under Mike Magana. A Construction Health and Safety Technician (CHST) and OSHA 500 authorized construction instructor with extensive Cal/OSHA compliance experience, Robert gives the City field management with safety discipline built in.
 The following references have direct knowledge of Moote’s performance on comparable public infrastructure programs
Name Title Agency / Organization Contact
Sam Cho Director of Development Prologis 470-349-0153
[email protected]
Jason Lee
VP Land Acquisition,
Development &
Entitlements
RCCD 714-412-6263
[email protected]
Miguel Sotomayor Principal Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 909-774-4330
Miguel.Sotomayor@city
ofrc.us
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 19 262
Insurance and Compliance
 Insurance. Moote maintains commercial general liability, workers’ compensation and employer’s liability, and professional liability coverage, and will furnish certificates and endorsements — including additional insured endorsements in favor of the City — meeting the requirements of the City’s standard professional services agreement upon selection.

Organization Chart
Moote reports directly to the City’s Principal Engineer and functions as an extension of City staff.

Reporting lines are as follows:
 City of Ontario / OMUC — Principal Engineer: program direction and all City approvals.  Eric Nutter, Principal-in-Charge: single point of accountability to the City; directs all Moote tasks.  Emily Gorman, Senior Project Manager: Task 3 project management; reports to the Principal-in- Charge.
 Mike Magana, Senior Construction Manager; Robert Thacker, Construction Manager; and an Assistant Construction Manager (TBD): Task 4 field construction management; report to the Principal-in-Charge and coordinate daily with the Senior Project Manager.  Interfaces: Engineers of Record (Westland — Ontario Ranch Road; Ardurra — Grove Avenue) under separate City design and construction support contracts; City inspection of record and materials testing by others; utility purveyors and outside agencies coordinated through Moote.

8. FEE PROPOSAL
 Task 1 (Cost Estimating and Master Schedule) is proposed on a time-and-materials basis against an allowance.
 Task 2 (Public and Private Bid Administration and Bid Support) is proposed as a fixed fee per bid package.
 Task 3 (Project Management) is proposed on a time-and-materials basis at the Section 6 rate schedule.
 Task 4 (Construction Management) is proposed as a full-time monthly fixed fee built from the Section 6 rate schedule.
 Task 5 (Reserve for Additional Bid Packages) is an allowance drawn only upon written City authorization.

Task 1 — Cost Estimating and Master Schedule
Position Rate Estimated Hours Total T&M Allowance
Principal $215.00 215 $46,225.00
Estimator $165.00 300 $49,500.00
Project Administrator $145.00 250 $36,250.00
Program Scheduling, Planning,
Strategy & Coordination Section 6 rates — $50,000.00
PROGRAM TOTAL 765 $181,975.00
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 20 263
TASK 1 TOTAL — T&M Allowance of $181,975.00. Moote will invoice only for time actually spent producing estimates, budgets, schedules, updates, and program planning. The allowance includes $50,000.00 for program scheduling, planning, strategy, and coordination meetings over and beyond milestone estimate production. Hours are invoiced at the Section 6 rates in effect at the time services are performed. Moote holds an existing $100,000.00 contract with the City that may be applied to offset this allowance, reducing the net new authorization required to approximately $81,975.00.

Task 2 — Public and Private Bid Administration and Bid Support Fixed fee of $15,000.00 per public bid package, inclusive of specification preparation, take-offs, Contract Price Schedule, advertisement, addenda, bid opening, bid analysis, and contract assembly. The ORR Bridge package carries a fixed fee of $25,000.00 to account for the additional specification, permitting coordination, and bid analysis effort associated with the structure.

Package Type Qty Total
Standard bid packages @ $15,000.00 each 17 $255,000.00
ORR Bridge — Cucamonga Channel @ $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 TASK 2 TOTAL 18 $280,000.00
Task 3 — Project Management — Dedicated Program Team (T&M) A dedicated, named program team providing continuous project management across all concurrent bid packages for the full program duration.

Position / Staff Rate Hrs / Week Monthly (2026
Rates) 64-Month Total
Principal — Eric Nutter $215.00 20 / 35 $17,200.00 –
$30,100.00 —
Senior Project Manager —
Emily Gorman $175.00 30 / 40 $21,000.00 –
$28,000.00 —
TOTAL $38,200.00 –
$58,100.00 $3,934,020.00
Monthly amounts are calculated on the basis of weekly hours × four weeks at the Section 6 rates in effect for each year, and represent a planning average, not a fixed monthly charge. At the City’s request, Tasks 3 and 4 are budgeted across the full sixty-four (64) month program duration — April 2027 through July 2032 — as presented in Section 5 and Exhibit B. The Principal and Senior Project Manager are engaged one month ahead of the Chino / Vineyard sewer start to carry planning, coordination, submittals, permits, and the preconstruction meeting. During the initial Chino / Vineyard sanitary sewer phase — April 2027 through December 2027 — the Principal is budgeted at an average of twenty (20) hours per week and the Senior Project Manager at an average of thirty (30) hours per week. From program-wide mobilization in January 2028 through the balance of the program, the Principal is budgeted at an average of thirty-five (35) hours per week and the Senior Project Manager full time at forty (40) hours per week. Minimum commitments during the sewer phase are fifteen (15) hours per week for the Principal and twenty-five (25) hours per week for the Senior Project Manager; thereafter the Principal is committed at a minimum of thirty (30) hours per week and the Senior Project Manager full time, so the allowance absorbs the weeks this program demands more without a change order. For budgeting: (9 × $39,280.00 in 2027) + (12 × $61,680.00 in 2028) + (12 × $63,460.00 in 2029) + (12 × $65,400.00 in 2030) + (12 × $67,340.00 in 2031) + (7 × $69,420.00 in 2032) = $3,934,020.00. Task 3 is invoiced monthly on a time-and-materials basis for hours actually worked, against the allowance shown. Team composition may be rebalanced with City concurrence as program phases shift.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 21 264
Project management for the City-directed Chino Avenue and Vineyard Avenue sanitary sewer is carried inside this Task 3 allowance and is not a separate add. It is identified here for the City’s records. The sewer is the only corridor in construction from April 2027 through December 2027 — one month of preconstruction plus eight months of construction — and the Task 3 cost of that window is nine (9) months × $39,280.00 = $353,520.00.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 22 265
Task 4 — Construction Management — Dedicated Program Team (Monthly Fixed Fee) Position / Staff Rate Hrs /
Week Monthly (2026 Rates) 64-Month Total
Senior Construction
Manager — Mike Magana $175.00 40 $28,000.00 —
Construction Manager —
Robert Thacker $150.00 40 $24,000.00 —
Assistant Construction
Manager — TBD $115.00 40 $18,400.00 —
TOTAL $46,400.00 –
$70,400.00 $4,282,720.00
Construction Management staffing scales with the number of corridors in construction — not the number of contractors, which does not change the fee. With one corridor in construction, the City is invoiced a fixed monthly fee for the Senior Construction Manager and Assistant Construction Manager; when a second corridor is in construction concurrently, the Construction Manager is added. As each corridor reaches completion its Construction Manager rolls off and the monthly fee steps back down — the City pays only for the field team actually deployed. The Senior Construction Manager mobilizes one full month ahead of the Chino / Vineyard sewer start, shown below as April 2027, so that Construction Management and Project Management are budgeted across the same sixty-four (64) months. Construction management during the period the sewer is the only corridor in construction — April 2027 through December 2027 — is $410,240.00; combined with the $353,520.00 identified under Task 3, that window accounts for $763,760.00 of the base fee. Monthly fees are built at the Section 6 rates in effect for each year. At the City’s request, Task 4 is budgeted across the full sixty-four (64) month program duration presented in Section 5 and Exhibit B, carrying the full three-person Construction Management team:

Period Corridors Team Monthly Fee Months Total
2027 (Apr) Sewer —
precon Sr. CM $28,800.00 1 $28,800.00
2027 (May–
Dec) Sewer Sr. CM + Asst. CM $47,680.00 8 $381,440.00
2028 ORR +
Grove Sr. CM + CM + Asst. CM $74,720.00 12 $896,640.00
2029 ORR +
Grove Sr. CM + CM + Asst. CM $76,960.00 12 $923,520.00
2030 (Jan–Feb) ORR +
Grove Sr. CM + CM + Asst. CM $79,200.00 2 $158,400.00
2030 (Mar–
Dec) ORR only Sr. CM + Asst. CM $52,160.00 10 $521,600.00 2031 (Jan–Jul) ORR only Sr. CM + Asst. CM $53,760.00 7 $376,320.00 2031 (Aug–
Dec) — Ext.

Program-
wide Sr. CM + CM + Asst. CM $81,600.00 5 $408,000.00
2032 (Jan–Jul)
— Ext.

Program-
wide Sr. CM + CM + Asst. CM $84,000.00 7 $588,000.00
TASK 4 TOTAL 64 $4,282,720.00
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 23 266
Task 5 — Reserve for Additional Bid Packages (Allowance) Three potential packages are identified in SOW 1.2 but are not currently defined: ORR Sanitary Sewer, Streetlights, and Fiber Optic. Rather than require a contract amendment should the City elect to proceed with any of them, Moote proposes a reserve allowance that the City may draw against by written authorization.

Package Basis Allowance
ORR Sanitary Sewer $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Streetlights (last-lane directive only) $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Fiber Optic (last-lane directive only) $15,000.00 $15,000.00 TASK 5 RESERVE 3 packages $45,000.00
Task 5 covers bid administration only. Associated project management effort for any authorized package is invoiced on a time-and-materials basis at the rates in Section 6. No portion of Task 5 is invoiced unless the City authorizes the package in writing.

Alternate Add Services
Site Safety Manager — $125.00 per hour (2026 rate), 40 hours per week: $20,000.00 per month at 2026 rates. If engaged for the full sixty-four (64) month budgeting period at the Section 6 rates in effect each year: $1,420,160.00.

Cost Reconciliation & Reimbursement Package — fixed fee of $12,000.00 per package. If engaged for all eighteen (18) bid packages: $216,000.00.

Prevailing Wage Compliance — $100.00 per hour. Dedicated prevailing wage compliance services beyond the certified payroll collection included in Task 3, as described in Section 3, invoiced on a time- and-materials basis.

City-Directed Subconsultants and Vendors
At the City’s written direction, Moote will contract with City-designated or City-approved subconsultants and vendors — utility locating and potholing, SWPPP, and similar professional and field support services — and administer their work as part of the program. Pass-through work is invoiced at actual cost plus a 10% administration fee, which covers procurement, contract administration, insurance verification, scheduling, invoice review, and collection of lien releases and certified payroll. Each pass-through firm must meet the City’s insurance requirements, name the City and Moote as additional insureds, and comply with prevailing wage and DIR registration requirements; responsibility for performance remains with the performing firm. Construction trade work remains within the publicly bid packages under Task 2, and no pass-through cost is incurred without the City’s prior written approval of the firm, scope, and cost.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 24 267
Fee Summary
Component Fee Basis
Task 1 — Estimating, Budget & Master Schedule $181,975.00 T&M Allowance Task 2 — Public and Private Bid Administration (18
packages) $280,000.00 Fixed Fee per Package
Task 3 — Project Management (64 months) $3,934,020.00 T&M Task 4 — Construction Management (64 months) $4,282,720.00 Fixed Fee per Month SUBTOTAL — BASE SERVICES $8,678,715.00
ALLOWANCES AND ALTERNATES — IF AUTHORIZED
Task 5 — Reserve for Additional Bid Packages (3) $45,000.00 Allowance Alternate Add — Site Safety Manager (64 months) $1,420,160.00 T&M Alternate Add — Cost Reconciliation &
Reimbursement (18) $216,000.00 Fixed Fee per Package
Alternate Add — Prevailing Wage Compliance $100.00 / hour T&M — As Requested Subcontractor or Vendor Pass Through 10% Markup Cost Plus

TOTAL IF ALL ALLOWANCES AND ALTERNATES
AUTHORIZED $10,359,875.00
Base services of $8,678,715.00 represent approximately 4.57% of an anticipated program value of approximately $190 million, which does not yet include the construction value of the Chino / Vineyard sanitary sewer. Full-service program and construction management on public infrastructure of this scale commonly ranges from eight to twelve percent of construction value.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 25 268

9. ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
This section should be read together with Section 2, Basis of Proposal, and the schedule assumptions in Section 5.
 A duration of sixty-four (64) months is assumed for budgeting Tasks 3 and 4 — April 2027 through July 2032 — being the program duration shown in Section 5 and Exhibit B, which includes the twelve (12) month period added at the City’s request. Task 1 and Task 2 are not duration-dependent: Task 1 is invoiced on a time-and-materials basis against an allowance, and Task 2 is a fixed fee per bid package earned as each package is bid. Task 3 begins upon completion of the first bid and is invoiced on a time-and-materials basis. Task 4 begins at construction commencement and is invoiced as a monthly fixed fee. Should the construction duration extend beyond the 64-month budgeting period for reasons outside Moote’s control, Tasks 3 and 4 will be extended by change order or contract amendment as described in Section 3, at the Section 6 rates in effect at the time the services are performed.
 Engineering design (PS&E), survey, geotechnical investigation, environmental documentation, right- of-way appraisal and acquisition services, and Engineer of Record construction support are by others under separate City contracts. Moote does not provide engineering design.  The Regional Traffic Analysis is by others; Moote will coordinate with and incorporate its outputs.  City inspection of record, specialty and deputy inspection, and materials testing are by others; Moote will coordinate with all third-party consultants.  The base fee includes eighteen (18) bid packages. ORR Sanitary Sewer, Streetlights, and Fiber Optic packages, and any others directed by the City, are carried under the Task 5 Reserve at $15,000.00 per package for bid administration, plus project management on a time-and-materials basis.  The Chino Avenue and Vineyard Avenue sanitary sewer is included in Tasks 3 and 4 only. At the City’s direction, Moote’s scope on that package is project management and construction management; cost estimating, master scheduling, and bid administration for it are excluded from Tasks 1 and 2 and are not included in the base fee. If later directed, that effort would be added by amendment at the Task 2 fixed fee per package plus estimating effort at the Section 6 rates.  Labor compliance services do not include collection of one-time or monthly documentation otherwise required by associated labor laws, nor on-site worker interviews; those services are available as an Alternate Add at the hourly rate in Section 6.  Services assume an eight-hour workday, Monday through Friday. Overtime, night, holiday, or weekend work requested by the City or required by contractor operations will be addressed by change order.
 City-furnished items include plan reproduction for bidding, project accounting, legal review of contracts, and permit fees.
 Field office, trailer, utilities, and internet, if required, will be provided at cost as a reimbursable or alternate item.
 The Construction Manager is not responsible for contractors' means, methods, or jobsite safety programs, or for the adequacy of contractor performance. Contractors remain solely responsible for their work.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 26 269

10. PAYMENT TERMS AND ACCEPTANCE
INVOICING. Moote will invoice monthly for services performed during the preceding month, with supporting detail by task. Invoices will identify the task, the personnel and hours applied for time-and- materials tasks, and the milestone or period earned for fixed-fee tasks.

PAYMENT. Payment terms will follow the payment provisions of the City's standard professional services agreement. In the absence of such provisions, invoices are payable within forty-five (45) days of receipt. Moote will administer invoicing consistent with the California Prompt Payment Act and the City's normal accounts payable cycle.

DISPUTED AMOUNTS. If the City disputes any portion of an invoice, Moote requests that the City pay the undisputed portion in the normal course and notify Moote in writing of the disputed portion so that it can be reviewed and resolved promptly. Moote will work cooperatively with City staff to resolve any billing question without interruption to services.

AGREEMENT FORM. Moote is prepared to execute the City's standard professional services agreement and to provide certificates of insurance and any other documentation the City requires. The signature block below is provided for the City's convenience and may be replaced in its entirety by the City's own agreement form.

We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to being included on your professional team.

MOOTE COMPANIES LLC
BY: ______________________________
Eric Nutter
Principal
DATE: ____________________________

CITY OF ONTARIO
BY: ______________________________
NAME: ____________________________
TITLE: ____________________________
DATE: ____________________________
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 27 270

EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are attached to and made part of this proposal:
 Exhibit A — Assumed Infrastructure by Discipline (Sheets A-1 through A-6)  Exhibit B — Preliminary Program Schedule
Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 28 271
EXHIBIT A — ASSUMED INFRASTRUCTURE BY DISCIPLINE
The following sheets, one per discipline and covering the program corridors, are attached following this page:
 Exhibit A-1 — Sanitary Sewer
 Exhibit A-2 — Storm Drain
 Exhibit A-3 — Domestic Water
 Exhibit A-4 — Recycled Water
 Exhibit A-5 — Joint Trench / Rule 20 Dry Utilities
 Exhibit A-6 — Street Improvements
Alignments shown are assumed for scoping and pricing purposes, prepared without plans or exhibits from the five-page Scope of Work (SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26); final alignments are by the Engineers of Record.

Moote Companies | Ontario Ranch West Program & Construction Management Proposal | Page 29 272
Grove - SS - Eucalyptus to
Riverside Dr.

SANITARY SEWER
ORR - SS - Euclid to Cucamonga
Channel - TBD N/S Segments (not
included in schedule / proposal)
Chino- SS - Grove to
Vineyard
Vineyard - SS - Chino to
Riverside Dr.

ONTARIO RANCH WEST
Ontario Ranch Rd, Grove Ave & Chino /
Vineyard Sewer — City of Ontario / OMUC
EXHIBIT A-1

SANITARY SEWER
Ontario Ranch West: Ontario Ranch Road, Grove
Avenue and Chino / Vineyard Sewer Improvements
Assumed infrastructure — for proposal basis only. Prepared without plans or exhibits from the five-page Scope of Work (SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26). Alignments shown are assumed for scoping and pricing; final alignments are by the Engineers of Record.

Ref. proposal Section 2 (Basis of Proposal) and Section 5.

Base imagery: Google Earth.

Moote Companies LLC
August 7, 2026 — Proposal 2026-0807
273

STORM DRAIN
Grove - SD - Eucalyptus to ORR
ORR - SD - Euclid to Cucamonga Channel - TBD -
INCLUDED 125 DAYS OF SD

ONTARIO RANCH WEST
Ontario Ranch Rd, Grove Ave & Chino /
Vineyard Sewer — City of Ontario / OMUC
EXHIBIT A-2

STORM DRAIN
Ontario Ranch West: Ontario Ranch Road, Grove
Avenue and Chino / Vineyard Sewer Improvements
Assumed infrastructure — for proposal basis only. Prepared without plans or exhibits from the five-page Scope of Work (SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26). Alignments shown are assumed for scoping and pricing; final alignments are by the Engineers of Record.

Ref. proposal Section 2 (Basis of Proposal) and Section 5.

Base imagery: Google Earth.

Moote Companies LLC
August 7, 2026 — Proposal 2026-0807
274

DOMESTIC WATER
Grove - DW - Chino to Riverside Dr.

ORR - DW - Euclid to Cucamonga Channel
Euclid - DW - Euclayptus to ORR

ONTARIO RANCH WEST
Ontario Ranch Rd, Grove Ave & Chino /
Vineyard Sewer — City of Ontario / OMUC
EXHIBIT A-3

DOMESTIC WATER
Ontario Ranch West: Ontario Ranch Road, Grove
Avenue and Chino / Vineyard Sewer Improvements
Assumed infrastructure — for proposal basis only. Prepared without plans or exhibits from the five-page Scope of Work (SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26). Alignments shown are assumed for scoping and pricing; final alignments are by the Engineers of Record.

Ref. proposal Section 2 (Basis of Proposal) and Section 5.

Base imagery: Google Earth.

Moote Companies LLC
August 7, 2026 — Proposal 2026-0807
Eucalyptus
275

RECYCLED WATER
Grove - RW - Eucalyptus to
Riverside Dr.

ORR - RW - Euclid to Cucamonga Channel

ONTARIO RANCH WEST
Ontario Ranch Rd, Grove Ave & Chino /
Vineyard Sewer — City of Ontario / OMUC
EXHIBIT A-4

RECYCLED WATER
Ontario Ranch West: Ontario Ranch Road, Grove
Avenue and Chino / Vineyard Sewer Improvements
Assumed infrastructure — for proposal basis only. Prepared without plans or exhibits from the five-page Scope of Work (SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26). Alignments shown are assumed for scoping and pricing; final alignments are by the Engineers of Record.

Ref. proposal Section 2 (Basis of Proposal) and Section 5.

Base imagery: Google Earth.

Moote Companies LLC
August 7, 2026 — Proposal 2026-0807
276

ONTARIO RANCH WEST
Ontario Ranch Rd, Grove Ave & Chino /
Vineyard Sewer — City of Ontario / OMUC
EXHIBIT A-5
JOINT TRENCH / RULE 20 DRY UTILITIES
Ontario Ranch West: Ontario Ranch Road, Grove
Avenue and Chino / Vineyard Sewer Improvements
Assumed infrastructure — for proposal basis only. Prepared without plans or exhibits from the five-page Scope of Work (SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26). Alignments shown are assumed for scoping and pricing; final alignments are by the Engineers of Record.

Ref. proposal Section 2 (Basis of Proposal) and Section 5.

Base imagery: Google Earth.

Moote Companies LLC
August 7, 2026 — Proposal 2026-0807
277
Ultimate Bridge Reconstruction - Westbound Only

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Grove - Streets - Eucalyptus to
Riverside Dr.

ORR - Streets - Euclid to Cucamonga
Channel
Euclid / ORR Intersection w/ Chino

ONTARIO RANCH WEST
Ontario Ranch Rd, Grove Ave & Chino /
Vineyard Sewer — City of Ontario / OMUC
EXHIBIT A-6

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Ontario Ranch West: Ontario Ranch Road, Grove
Avenue and Chino / Vineyard Sewer Improvements
Assumed infrastructure — for proposal basis only. Prepared without plans or exhibits from the five-page Scope of Work (SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26). Alignments shown are assumed for scoping and pricing; final alignments are by the Engineers of Record.

Ref. proposal Section 2 (Basis of Proposal) and Section 5.

Base imagery: Google Earth.

Moote Companies LLC
August 7, 2026 — Proposal 2026-0807
278
Jan
2027
Jul
2027
Jan
2028
Jul
2028
Jan
2029
Jul
2029
Jan
2030
Jul
2030
Jan
2031
Jul
2031
CHINO AVENUE ±1.0 mi (Grove Ave to Vineyard Ave)
Sanitary Sewer 21" VCP, 5,280 LF (106 WD)
VINEYARD AVENUE ±0.5 mi (Chino Ave to Riverside Dr)
Sanitary Sewer 21" VCP, 2,640 LF (53 WD)
ONTARIO RANCH ROAD ±3.3 mi (Euclid Ave to Archibald Ave) Storm Drain misc. scope (allowance)
Domestic Water 2 headings
Recycled Water
Joint Trench / Dry Utilities
Streets south half width + 1 lane
Traffic Signals (4 EA)
Euclid / ORR Intersection
Half-Width Bridge @ Cucamonga Channel
Streets half width + 1 lane to ultimate
Median Street & Landscape / Irrigation

EUCLID AVENUE
Domestic Water Eucalyptus Ave to ORR
GROVE AVENUE ±2.0 mi (Eucalyptus Ave to Riverside Dr) Sanitary Sewer Eucalyptus Ave to Riverside Dr
Storm Drain Eucalyptus Ave to ORR
Domestic Water Chino Ave to Riverside Dr
Recycled Water
Joint Trench / Dry Utilities
Streets full width
Traffic Signals (3 EA)
Median Landscape / Irrigation
147 CD
73 CD
177 CD
214 CD
228 CD
162 CD
440 CD
113 CD
139 CD
327 CD
293 CD
83 CD
97 CD
322 CD
112 CD
62 CD
161 CD
112 CD
475 CD
97 CD
75 CD
SCE Transmission
Relocation (plug date)

CITY-REQUESTED EXTENSION
+12 months Jul 2031 to Jul 2032
T asks 3 & 4 budgeted across the full 64-month
program duration at Section 6 annual rates.

See proposal Sections 5 and 8.

EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PROGRAM SCHEDULE
Ontario Ranch West: Ontario Ranch Road, Grove Avenue and Chino / Vineyard Sanitary Sewer Improvements Assumed program start 04/2027 (preconstruction) corridor completion 07/09/2031 City-requested 12-month extension to 07/2032 64-month program duration Chino / Vineyard Sewer Ontario Ranch Road Euclid Avenue Grove Avenue Preliminary and for proposal basis only. Prepared without plans or exhibits from the five-page Scope of Work (SOW 1.2, dated 6/23/26). Durations shown in calendar days; see proposal Section 5 for working-day durations, assumptions, and clarifications requested.

Excludes ORR Sanitary Sewer (no scope defined), Streetlights, and Fiber Optic. Moote Companies LLC. REV 6 carries the City-directed Chino Avenue and Vineyard Avenue sanitary sewer (±1.5 mi of 21" VCP, 159 working days at 50 LF per day) as the first construction activity; Ontario Ranch Road, Euclid Avenue and Grove Avenue shift 364 calendar days to a 01/03/2028 start per City direction. The corridor durations shown plus the City-requested twelve (12) month extension (Jul 2031 Jul 2032) = a sixty-four (64) month program duration. 279
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 5 of 5 ends

BB&K 2020

Attachment C

Exhibit “C” – COMPENSATION

280

60 Corporate Park, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92606
(949) 428-1400
www.moote.com

2026 TIME & MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
Classification (per hour) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Principal $215.00 $221.00 $228.00 $235.00 $242.00 $249.00 $257.00 Senior Project Manager $175.00 $180.00 $186.00 $191.00 $197.00 $203.00 $209.00 Senior Construction Manager $175.00 $180.00 $186.00 $191.00 $197.00 $203.00 $209.00 Estimator $165.00 $170.00 $175.00 $180.00 $186.00 $191.00 $197.00 Construction Manager $150.00 $155.00 $159.00 $164.00 $169.00 $174.00 $179.00 Project Administrator $145.00 $149.00 $154.00 $158.00 $163.00 $168.00 $173.00 Site Safety Manager $125.00 $129.00 $133.00 $137.00 $141.00 $145.00 $149.00 Assistant Construction Manager $115.00 $118.00 $122.00 $126.00 $129.00 $133.00 $137.00 Prevailing Wage Compliance $100.00 $103.00 $106.00 $109.00 $113.00 $116.00 $119.00

Notes
Annual escalation. Rates escalate three percent (3%) year over year as shown above, and continue to escalate three percent (3%) annually beyond 2032 if services extend further. Hourly services are invoiced at the rate in effect at the time services are performed.

Fully burdened. Rates are fully burdened and include normal reproduction, mobile communications, and vehicle costs.

Extended team. Additional classifications required by the program, if any, will be proposed at market rates subject to City approval and will follow the same three percent (3%) annual escalation.

Pass-through work. Client-directed subconsultant and vendor pass-through work is invoiced at actual cost plus a ten percent (10%) administration fee.

Moote Companies LLC • 2026 Time & Materials Rate Schedule 281
46700.00100\40935196.1
BB&K (2024) -1-

CITY OF ONTARIO

DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into as of ____________, by and between the City of Ontario, a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 303 East “B” Street, Ontario, California 91764 - 4196, County of San Bernardino, State of California (“City”), and WestLAND Group, Inc. , a California Corporation, with its principal place of business at 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (hereinafter referred to as “ Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. RECITALS.

2.1 City. City is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of California, with power to contract for services necessary to achieve its purpose.

2.2 Consultant. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional engineering design services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant warrants that it is fully licensed, qualified, and willing to perform the services required by this Agreement; provided, however, that if Consultant is a corporation or other organization, the Project Consultant designated pursuant to Section 3.2, and not the Consultant itself, shall be fully licensed to practice as an engineer in the State of California.

2.3 Project. City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the Ontario Ranch Road Corridor Improvement Project ("Project") as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS

3.1 Employment of Consultant.

DEBRA PORADA

MAYOR PRO TEM
ALAN D. WAPNER
JIM W. BOWMAN

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

ENTER DATE

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK
JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
282
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -2-

(hereinafter referred to as “Services”). The Services are more particularly described throughout this Agreement, including Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance wit h, this Agreement, any exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. All Services performed by Consultant shall be subject to the sole and discretionary approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from September 15, 2026 to August 31, 2031 , unless earlier terminated as provided herein . Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

3.2 Project Consultant; Key Personnel.

3.2.1 Engineer of Record. Consultant shall name a specific individual to act as Project Consultant, subject to the approval of City. Consultant hereby designates Siara MacKinney (License No. 85559) to act as the Engineer of Record for the Project. The Engineer of Record shall: (1) maintain oversight of the Services; (2) have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement; (3) supervise and direct the Services using his or her best skill and attention; (4) be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures used for the Services; (5) adequately coordinate all portions of the Services; and (6) act as principal contact with City and all contractors, consultants, engineers and inspectors on the Project. Any change in the Engineer of Record shall be subject to the City’s prior written approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The new Engineer of Record shall be of at least equal competence as the Engineer of Record. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of a new Engineer of Record, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause.

3.2.2 Key Personnel. In addition to the Engineer of Record , Consultant has represented to the City that certain additional key personnel, engineers and consultants will perform the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel, engineers or consultants become unavailable, Consultant may substitute others of at least equal competence upon written approval of the City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, engineers or consultants, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. The key additional personnel, engineers and consultants for performance of this Agreement are as follows: N/A

3.3 Hiring of Consultants and Personnel.

3.3.1 Right to Hire or Employ . Consultant shall have the option, unless City objects in writing after notice, to employ at its expense architects, engineers, experts or other consultants qualified and licensed to render services in connection with the planning and/or administration of the Project , and to delegate to them such duties as Consultant may delegate without relieving Consultant from administrative or other responsibility under this Agreement.

Consultant shall be responsible for the coordination and cooperation of Consultant’s architects, engineers, experts or other consultants. All consultants, including changes in consultants, shall be subject to approval by City in its sole and reasonable discretion. Consultant shall notify City of the identity of all consultants at least fourteen (14) days prior to their commencement of work to allow City to review their qualifications and approve to their participation on the Project in its sole and reasonable discretion.
283
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -3-

3.3.2 Qualification and License . All architects, engineers, experts and other consultants retained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be qualified to perform the Services assigned to them, and shall be licensed to practice in their respective professions, where required by law.

3.3.3 Standards and Insurance . All architects, engineers, experts and other consultants hired by Consultant shall be required to meet all of the same standards and insurance requirements set forth in this Agreement, unless other standards or requirements are approved by the City in writing. Unless changes are approved in writing by the City, Consultant’s agreements with its consultants shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.

3.3.4 Assignments or Staff Changes . Consultant shall promptly obtain written City approval of any assignment, reassignment or replacement of such architects , engineers, experts and consultants, or of other staff changes of key personnel working on the Project. As provided in the Agreement, any changes in Consultant’s consultants and key personnel shall be subject to approval by City.

3.3.5 Draftsman and Clerical Support. Draftsmen and clerical personnel shall be retained by Consultant at Consultant’s sole expense.

3.4 Standard of Care.

3.4.1 Standard of Care . Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals qualified to perform the Services in the same discipline in the State of California, and shall be responsible to City for damages sustained by the City and delays to the Project as specified in the indemnification provision of this Agreement. Without limiting the foregoing, Consultant shall be fully responsible to the City for any increased costs incurred by the City as a result of any such delays in the design or construction of the Project. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents that all of its employees, architects, engineers, experts and other consultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees, architects, engineers, experts and other consultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services assigned to or rendered by them and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein.

3.4.2 Performance of Employees . Any employee or consultant who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee or consultant who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.
284
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -4-

3.5 Laws and Regulations.

3.5.1 Knowledge and Compliance. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Services or the Project, and shall give all notices required of the Consultant by law. Consultant shall be liable, pursuant to the standard of care and indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with its Services. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.5.2 Drawings and Specifications . Consultant shall cause all drawings and specifications to conform to any applicable requirements of federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including the Uniform Building Code, in effect as of the time the drawings and specifications are prepared or revised during the latest phase of the Services described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto. Any significant revisions made necessary by changes in such laws, rules and regulations after this time may be compensated as Additional Services which were not known or reasonably should not have been known by Consultant. Consultant shall cause the necessary copies of such drawings and specifications to be filed with any governmental bodies with approval jurisdiction over the Project, in accordance with the Services described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto. For the preparation of al l such drawings and specifications, the Consultant shall use Computer Aided Design Drafting (“CADD”) (e.g., AutoCAD) or other technology acceptable to the Consultant and City.

3.5.3 Americans with Disabilities Act . Consultant will use its best professional efforts to interpret all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations with respect to access, including those of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Consultant shall inform City of the existence of inconsistencies of which it is aware or reasonably should be aware between federal and state accessibility laws, rules and regulations, as well as any other issues which are subject to conflicting interpretations of the law, and shall provide the City with its interpretation of such inconsistencies and conflicting interpretations. Unless Consultant brings such inconsistencies and conflicting interpretations to the attention of the City and requests City’s direction on how to proceed, the Consultant’s interpretation of such inconsistencies and conflicting interpretations shall be the sole responsibility and liability of Consultant, and the Consultant shall correct all plans, specifications and other documents prepared for the Project at no additional cost if its interpretations are shown to be incorrect. In the event that the Consultant request’s City’s direction on how to proceed with respect to any inconsistent and/or conflicting interpretation, the Consultant shall be responsible to the City only pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement.

3.5.4 Permits, Approvals and Authorizations. Consultant shall provide City with a list of all permits, approvals or other authorizations required for the Project from all federal, state or local governmental bodies with approval jurisdiction over the Project. Consultant shall then assist the City in obtaining all such permits, approvals and other authorizations. The costs of such permits, approvals and other authorizations shall be paid by the City.

3.5.5 Water Quality Management and Compliance. Consultant shall keep itself and all subcontractors, staff, and employees fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations that may impact, or be implicated by the performance of the Services including, without limita tion, all applicable provisions of the City’s ordinances 285
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -5-

regulating water quality and storm water; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.); the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Cal Water Code §§ 13000- 14950); and any and all regulations, policies, or permits issued pursuant to any such authority.

Consultant shall additionally comply with the lawful requirements of the City, and any other municipality, drainage district, or other local agency with jurisdiction over the location where the Services are to be conducted, regulating water quality and storm water d ischarges. Failure to comply with laws, regulations, and ordinances listed in this Section is a violation of federal and state law.

3.6 Independent Contractor.

3.6.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates . City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an employee of City. Consultant is not an employee for state tax, federal tax or any other purpose, and is not entitled to the rights or benefits afforded to City’s employees. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City, and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.7 Schedule of Services.

3.7.1 Consultant Services. Consultant shall fully and adequately complete the Services described in this Agreement and in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

3.7.2 Timely Performance Standard . Consultant shall perform all Services hereunder as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care, as well as the orderly progress of the Project work so as not to be the cause, in whole or in part, of delays in the completion of the Project or in t he achievement of any Project milestones, as provided herein.

Specifically, Consultant shall perform its Services so as to allow for the full and adequate completion of the Project within the time required by the City and within any completion schedules adopted for the Project. Consultant agrees to coordinate with City’s staff, contractors and consultants in the performance of the Services, and shall be available to City’s staff, contractors and consultants at all reasonable times.

3.7.3 Performance Schedule . Consultant shall prepare an estimated time schedule for the performance of Consultant’s Services, to be adjusted as the Project proceeds.

Such schedule shall be subject to the City’s review and approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, and shall include allowances for periods of time required for City’s review and approval of submissions, and for approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over Project approval and funding. If City and Consultant cannot mutually agree on a performance schedule, City shall have the authority to immediately terminate this Agreement. The schedule shall not be exceeded by Consultant without the prior written approval of City. If the Consultant’s Services are not completed within the time provided by the agreed upon performance schedule, or any milestones established therein, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the City will suffer damage for which the Consultant will be responsible.
286
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -6-

3.7.4 Excusable Delays . Any delays in Consultant’s work caused by the following may be added to the time for completion of any obligations of Consultant: (1) the actions of City or its employees; (2) the actions of those in direct contractual relationship with City; (3) the actions of any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the Project; (4) the actions of any parties not within the reasonable control of the Consultant; and (5) any Force Majeure Event (as defined herein) or other unforeseen occurrence not due to any fault or negligence on the part of Consultant. Neither the City nor the Consultant shall be liable for damages, liquidated or otherwise, to the other on account of such delays.

3.7.5 Force Majeure Events. Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non -performing Party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include a Force Majeure Event. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects a Party’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the services); (4) strikes and other organized labor action occurring at the site and the effects thereof on the services, only to the extent such strikes and other organized labor action are beyond the control of Consultant and its subcontractors, and to the extent the effects thereof cannot be avoided by use of replacement workers; and (5) pandemics, epidemics or quarantine restrictions. For purposes of this section, “orders of governmental authorities,” includes ordinances, emergency proclamations and orders, rules to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and other actions of a public agency applicable to the Services and Agreement. Should a Force Majeure Event occur, the non- performing Party shall, within fifteen (15) calendar days of the beginning of an Force Majeure Event, give written notice to the other Party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. Force Majeure Events shall not entitle Consultant to any additional compensation. Notwithstanding the foregoing in this section, the City may still terminate this Agreement in accordance with the termination provisions of this Agreement.

3.7.6 Request for Excusable Delay Credit . The Consultant shall, within fifteen (15) calendar days of the beginning of any excusable delay, notify the City in writing of the causes of delay (unless City grants in writing a further period of time to file such notice prior to the date of final payment under the Ag reement). City will then ascertain the facts and the extent of the delay, and grant an extension of time for completing the Services when, in its sole judgment, the findings of fact justify such an extension. The City’s findings of fact thereon shall be final and conclusive on the Parties. Extensions of time shall apply only to that portion of the Services affected by the delay and shall not apply to other portions of the Services not so affected. The sole remedy of Consultant for extensions of time shall be an extension of the performance time at no cost to the City. If Additional Services are required as a result of an excusable delay, the Parties shall mutually agree thereto pursuant to the Additional Services provision of this Agreement. Should Consultant make an application for an extension of time, Consultant shall submit evidence that the insurance policies required by this Agreement remain in effect during the requested additional period of time.

3.8 Additional Services.

3.8.1 Request for Services . At City’s request, Consultant may be asked to perform services not otherwise included in this Agreement, not included within the basic services 287
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -7-

listed in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, and/or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted architectural practice.

3.8.2 Definition. As used herein, “Additional Services” mean: (1) any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary for the Consultant to perform at the execution of this Agreement; or (2) any work listed as Additional Services in Exhibit “A” attached hereto. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Additional Services without prior written authorization from City and without an agreement between the City and Consultant as to the compensation to be paid for such services. City shall pay Consultant for any approved Additional Services, pursuant to the compensation provisions herein, so long as such services are not made necessary through the fault of Consultant pursuant to the indemnification provision of this Agreement.

3.8.3 Examples of Additional Services . Such Additional Services shall not include any redesign or revisions to drawings, specifications or other documents when such revisions are necessary in order to bring such documents into compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations or codes of which Consultant was aware or should have been aware pursuant to the laws and regulations provision of this Agreement above. Such Additional Services may include, but shall not be limited to:
(a) Separately Bid Portions of Project . Plan preparation and/or administration of work on portions of the Project separately bid. (b) Furniture and Interior Design. Assistance to City, if requested, for the selection of moveable furniture, equipment or articles which are not included in the Construction Documents.
(c) Fault of Contractor . Services caused by delinquency, default or insolvency of contractor, or by major defects in the work of the contractor, provided that any such services made necessary by the failure of Consultant to detect and report such matters when it reasonably should have done so shall not be compensated. (d) Inconsistent Approvals or Instructions . Revisions in drawings, specifications or other documents when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given and are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. (e) Legal Proceedings. Serving as an expert witness on City's behalf or attending legal proceedings to which the Consultant is not a party. (f) Damage Repair. Supervision of repair of damages to any structure. (g) Extra Environmental Services . Additional work required for environmental conditions (e.g. asbestos or site conditions) not already contemplated within the Consultant's services for the Project.

3.9 City Responsibilities. City’s responsibilities shall include the following:

3.9.1 Data and Information. City shall make available to Consultant all necessary data and information concerning the purpose and requirements of the Project, including scheduling and budget limitations, objectives, constraints and criteria. As part of the budget 288
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -8-

limitation information, the City shall provide the Consultant with a preliminary construction budget (“City’s Preliminary Construction Budget”).

3.9.2 Project Survey . If required pursuant to the scope of the Project and if requested by Consultant, City shall furnish Consultant with, or direct Consultant to procure at City’s expense, a survey of the Project site prepared by a registered surveyor or civil engineer, any other record documents which shall indicate existing structures, land features, improvements, sewer, water, gas, electrical and utility lines, topographical information and boundary dimensions of the site, and any other such pertinent information.

3.9.3 Bid Phase. Distribute Construction Documents to bidders and conduct the opening and review of bids for the Project.

3.9.4 Testing. Retain consultant(s) to conduct chemical, mechanical, soils, geological or other tests required for proper design of the Project, and furnish such surveys, borings, test pits, and other tests as may be necessary to reveal conditions of the site which must be known to determine soil condition or to ensure the proper development of the required drawings and specifications.

3.9.5 Required Inspections and Tests. Retain consultant(s) to conduct materials testing and inspection or environmental/hazardous materials testing and inspection pursuant to any applicable laws, rules or regulations.

3.9.6 Fees of Reviewing or Licensing Agencies . Directly pay or reimburse the payment of all fees required by any reviewing or licensing agency, or other agency having approval jurisdiction over the Project.

3.9.7 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. The City Manager hereby designates Dennis Mejia, PE, Utilities Engineering Manager, or his or her designee, as the City’s contact for the implementation of the Services hereunder. Contractor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.9.8 Review and Approved Documents . Review all documents submitted by Consultant, including change orders and other matters requiring approval by the City Council or other officials. City shall advise Consultant of decisions pertaining to such documents within a reasonable time after submission, so as not to cause unreasonable delay as provided in the excusable delay provisions of this Agreement above.

3.10 Compensation.

3.10.1 Consultant’s Compensation for Basic Services . City shall pay to Consultant, for the performance of all Services rendered under this Agreement, the total not to exceed amount of Seven Million, Five Hundred Forty Thousand, Five Hundred Fifty-Two Dollars ($7,540,552) (“Total Compensation”). This Total Compensation amount shall be based upon, and may be adjusted according to, the fee schedule and related terms and conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference. The Total Compensation, as may be adjusted upon mutual agreement, shall constitute complete and adequate payment for Services under this Agreement.
289
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -9-

3.10.2 Payment for Additional Services . At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Additional Services. As used herein, Additional Services means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement . Any additional work in excess of this amount must be approved by the City . If authorized, such Additional Services will be compensated at the rates and in the manner set forth in Exhibit “ B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, unless a flat rate or some other form of compensation is mutually agreed upon by the Parties. If City requires Consultant to hire consultants to perform any Additional Services, Consultant shall be compensated therefore at the rates and in the manner set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, unless a flat rate or some other form of compensation is mutually agreed upon by the Parties. City shall have the authority to review and approve the rates of any such consultants. In addition, Consultant shall be reimbursed for any expenses incurred by such consultants pursuant to the terms and conditions of Section 3.10.3.

3.10.3 Reimbursable Expenses . Reimbursable expenses are in addition to compensation for the Services and Additional Services. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City, which approval may be evidenced by inclusion in Exhibit “B” attached hereto. Such reimbursable expenses shall include only those expenses which are reasonably and necessarily incurred by Consultant in the interest of the Project.

Consultant shall be required to acquire prior written consent in order to obtain reimbursement for the following: (1) extraordinary transportation expenses incurred in connection with the Project; (2) out-of-town travel expenses incurred in connection with the Project; (3) fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project; (4) bid document duplication cost s in excess of $1,000; and (5) other costs, fees and expenses in excess of $1,000.

3.10.4 Payment to Consultant. Consultant’s compensation and reimbursable expenses shall be paid by City to Consultant no more often than monthly. Such periodic payments shall be made based upon the percentage of work completed, and in accordance with the phasing and funding schedule provided in Exhibit “B” and the compensation rates indicated in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In order to receive payment, Consultant shall present to City an itemized statement which indicates Services performed, percentage of Services completed, method for computing the amount payable, and the amount to be paid. The statement shall describe the amount of Services provided since the i nitial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement, as well as those expenses for which reimbursement is requested for that statement period. The amount paid to Consultant shall never exceed the percentage amounts authorized by the phasing and funding schedule located in Exhibit “B” attached hereto. City shall, within thirty (30) days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon pu rsuant to the provisions of Civil Code Section 3320. Disputed amounts shall be resolved by the Parties in a mutually agreeable manner.

Payments made for Additional Services shall be made in installments, not more often than monthly, proportionate to the degree of completion of such services or in such other manner as the Parties shall specify when such services are agreed upon, and in accordance with any authorized fee or rate schedule. In order to receive payment, Consultant shall present to City an itemized statement which indicates the Additional Services performed, percentage of Additional Services completed, method for computing the amount payable, and the amount to be paid. The statement shall describe the amount of Add itional Services provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within thirty (30) days of receiving such statement, review 290
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -10-

the statement and pay all approved charges thereon pursuant to the provisions of Civil Code Section 3320. Disputed amounts shall be resolved by the Parties in a mutually agreeable manner.

Upon cancellation or termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated as set forth in the termination provision herein.

3.10.5 Withholding Payment to Consultant. The City may withhold payment, in whole or in part, to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the City from claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages, or injuries of any kind to the extent arising out of or cau sed by the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct protected under the indemnification provisions of this Agreement. Failure by City to deduct any sums from a progress payment shall not constitute a waiver of the City’s right to such sums. The Ci ty may keep any moneys which would otherwise be payable at any time hereunder and apply the same, or so much as may be necessary therefor, to the payment of any expenses, losses, or damages as determined by the City, incurred by the City for which Consultant is liable under the Agreement or state law. Payments to the Consultant for compensation and reimbursable expenses due shall not be contingent on the construction, completion or ultimate success of the Project. Payment to the Consultant shall not be withheld, postponed, or made contingent upon receipt by the City of offsetting reimbursement or credit from Parties not within the Consultant’s reasonable control.

3.10.6 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects. Since the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with and to require its consultants to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement.

Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the Project site. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all subconsultants to comply with all California Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records ( Labor Code Section s 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815) and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1). The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Cod e Section 1771.4.

Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure of the Consultant or its consultants to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
(a) Registration/DIR Compliance. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works project” of over $25,000 when the project is for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work, or a public works project of over $15,000 when the project is for maintenance work, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such Services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). Consultant shall maintain 291
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -11-

registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants. This project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements, including the submission of payroll records directly to the DIR. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subconsultant that affect Consultant’s performance of services, including any delay, shall be Consul tant’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Consultant caused delay and shall not be compensable by the City. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subconsultant.

3.10.7 Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) payments. It is the City’s policy to pay its consultant invoices via electronic fund transfers through the ACH network. All payments due and owing pursuant to a properly issued and correct invoice or under this Agreement shall be made through electronic ACH transfers, un less otherwise agreed upon by both Parties in writing. Consultant shall provide the City with ACH payment details whereby the City shall initiate the ACH transfers to Consultant in the amount required pursuant to a properly issued and correct invoice or under this Agreement. Each Party shall undertake any and all required actions and execute any required documents, instruments, or agreements required to effectuate the requirements of this Section. In the event the City erroneously deposits funds into an account, or otherwise deposits funds to which Consultant is not entitled: (1) Consultant shall immediately notify the City and the financial institution; (2) Consultant shall not withdraw any of the funds which were erroneously deposited or to which Consultant is not entitled; and (3) Consultant authorizes both the City and financial institution to take all actions necessary to correct the error and return to the City all funds erroneously deposited or to which Consultant is not entitled.

3.11 Notice to Proceed.

Consultant shall not proceed with performance of any Services under this Agreement unless and until the City provides a written notice to proceed.

3.12 Termination, Suspension and Abandonment.

3.12.1 Grounds for Termination; Consultant’s Termination for Cause. City hereby reserves the right to suspend or abandon, at any time and for any reason, all or any portion of the Project and the construction work thereon, or to terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Consultant shall be provided with at least seven (7) days advanced written notice of such suspension, abandonment or termination. In the event of such suspension, abandonment or termination, Consultant shall be paid for Services and reimbursable expenses rendered up to the date of such suspension, abandonment or termination, pursuant to the schedule of payments provided for in this Agreement, less any claims against or damages suffered by City as a resu lt of the default, if any, by Consultant. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement, except as set forth herein, in the event of such suspension, abandonment or termination. Consultant may terminate this Agreement for substantial breach of performance by the City such as failure to make payment to Consultant as provided in this Agreement.

3.12.2 City’s Suspension of Work. If Consultant’s Services are suspended by City, City may require Consultant to resume such Services within ninety (90) days after written notice 292
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -12-

from City. When the Project is resumed, the Total Compensation and schedule of Services shall be equitably adjusted upon mutual agreement of the City and Consultant.

3.12.3 Documents and Other Data . Upon suspension, abandonment or termination, Consultant shall provide to City all preliminary studies, sketches, working drawings, specifications, computations, and all other Project Documents, as defined below, to which City would have been entitled at the completion of Consultant’s Services under this Agreement. Upon payment of the amount required to be paid to Consultant pursuant to the termination provisions of this Agreement, City shall have the rights, as provided in this Agreement hereinafter, to use such Project Documents prepared by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement.

Consultant shall make such documents available to City upon request and without additional compensation other than as may be approved as a reimbursable expense.

3.12.4 Employment of other Consultants. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.13 Ownership and Use of Documents; Confidentiality.

3.13.1 Ownership. All plans, specifications, original or reproducible transparencies of working drawings and master plans, preliminary sketches, architectural presentation drawings, structural computations, estimates and any other documents prepared pursuant to this Agre ement, including, but not limited to, any other works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression such as writings, physical drawings and data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes (hereinafter referred to as the “Project Do cuments”) shall be and remain the property of City. Although the official copyright in all Project Documents shall remain with the Consultant or other applicable subcontractors or consultants, the Project Documents shall be the property of City whether or not the work for which they were made is executed or completed. Within thirty (30) calendar days following completion of the Project, Consultant shall provide to City copies of all Project Documents required by City. In addition, Consultant shall retain copies of all Project Documents on file for a minimum of fifteen (15) years following completion of the Project, and shall make copies available to City upon the payment of reasonable duplication costs. Before destroying the Project Documents following this retention period, Consultant shall make a reasonable effort to notify City and provide City with the opportunity to obtain the documents.

3.13.2 Right to Use. Consultant grants to City the right to use and reuse all or part of the Project Documents, at City’s sole discretion and with no additional compensation to Consultant, for the following purposes:
(a) The construction of all or part of this Project.
(b) The repair, renovation, modernization, replacement, reconstruction or expansion of this Project at any time;
(c) The construction of another project by or on behalf of the City for its ownership and use;
City is not bound by this Agreement to employ the services of Consultant in the event such documents are used or reused for these purposes. City shall be able to use or reuse the Project Documents for these purposes without risk of liability to the Consultant or third parties with respect 293
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -13-

to the condition of the Project Documents, and the use or reuse of the Project Documents for these purposes shall not be construed or interpreted to waive or limit City’s right to recover for latent defects or for errors or omissions of the Consultant.

Any use or reuse by City of the Project Documents on any project other than this Project without employing the services of Consultant shall be at City’s own risk with respect to third parties. If City uses or reuses the Project Documents on any project other than this Project, it shall remove the Consultant’s seal from the Project Documents and hold harmless Consultant and its officers, directors, agents and employees from claims arising out of the negligent use or re-use of the Project Documents on such other project.

3.13.3 License. This Agreement creates a non -exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify or reuse any and all Project Documents and any intellectual property rights therein. Consultant shall require any and all subcontractors and consultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non -exclusive and perpetual license for the work of such subcontractors or consultants performed pursuant to this Agreement.

3.13.4 Right to License. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all copyrights, designs and other intellectual property embodied in the Project Documents that Consultant prepares or causes to be prepared pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement for any breach of this Section. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to previously prepared designs, plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates or other documents that were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant and provided to Consultant by City.

3.13.5 Confidentiality. All Project Documents, either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement, shall be held confidential by Consultant to the extent they are not subject to disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Act. All Project Documents shall not, without the written consent of City, be used or reproduced by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not disclose, cause or facilitate the disclosure of the Project Documents to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the written consent of City.

3.14 Indemnification.

3.14.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consul tant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses except such loss or damage caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall 294
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -14-

survive expiration or termination of this Agreement and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

3.14.2 If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2 782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

3.15 Insurance.

Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this Section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.15.1 Types of Insurance Required . As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of the Agreement the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the insurance requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so.

3.15.2 Additional Insured. The City of Ontario, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on Consultant’s and its subconsultants’ policies of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance using the endorsements and forms specified herein or exact equivalents.

3.15.3 Commercial General Liability
(a) The Consultant shall take out and maintain, during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (b) Coverage for Commercial General Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as the following: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent. Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for the following:
(i) Bodily Injury and Property Damage
(ii) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury
(iii) Premises/Operations Liability
(iv) Products/Completed Operations Liability
295
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -15-

(v) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project
(vi) Explosion, Collapse and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted
(vii) Contractual Liability with respect to this Contract (viii) Broad Form Property Damage
(ix) Independent Consultants Coverage
(c) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement.
(d) The policy shall give City, the City Council and each member of the City Council, its officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage.
(e) The general liability program may utilize either deductibles or provide coverage excess of a self -insured retention, subject to written approval by the City, and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured.

3.15.4 Automobile Liability
(a) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage including coverage for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City.
(b) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto).
(c) The policy shall give City, the City Council and each member of the City Council, its officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status.
(d) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles, provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention.

3.15.5 Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability
(a) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement.
296
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -16-

(b) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement, at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement, all in accordance with the “Workers’ Compensation and Insurance Act,” Division IV of the Labor Code of the Sta te of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer’s Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain, for the period required by this Agreement, workers’ compensation coverage of the same type a nd limits as specified in this Section.

3.15.6 Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions)
(a) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement the Consultant shall maintain professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein. This insurance shall be written on a policy form cover age specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend.

3.15.7 Minimum Policy Limits Required
(a) The following insurance limits are required for the Agreement:

Coverage Combined Single Limit
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence/ $4,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal
injury, and property damage
Automobile Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage
Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence
Professional Liability $2,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions)

(b) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits. (c) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement.

3.15.8 Evidence Required
(a) Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance required herein. Such evidence shall include original copies of the ISO CG 00 01 (or insurer’s equivalent) signed by the insurer’s repr esentative and Certificate of Insurance (Acord 297
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -17-

Form 25-S or equivalent), together with required endorsements. All evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insured s, where appropriate, the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance.

3.15.9 Policy Provisions Required
(a) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration.
(b) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant’s policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.
(c) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims -made policy with a re troactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement.
(d) All required insurance coverages, except for the professional liability coverage, shall contain or be endorsed to waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
(e) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability.

Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law.

3.15.10 Qualifying Insurers
(a) All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies, as determined by the City, which satisfy the following minimum requirements: Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or 298
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -18-

otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

3.15.11 Additional Insurance Provisions
(a) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the City, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification.
(b) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.
(c) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (d) Neither the City nor the City Council, nor any member of the City Council, nor any of the officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement.

3.15.12 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements
(a) Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this Section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants.

3.16 Records.

Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable.

Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of five (5) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.17 Standardized Manufactured Items.

Consultant shall cooperate and consult with City in the use and selection of manufactured items on the Project, including but not limited to, paint, hardware, plumbing, mechanical and electrical equipment, fixtures, roofing materials and floor coverings. All such manufactured items 299
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -19-

shall be standardized to City’s criteria to the extent such criteria do not interfere with building design.

3.18 Limitation of Agreement.

This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the Project described herein. Any additional or subsequent construction at the site of the Project, or at any other City site, will be covered by, and be the subject of, a separate Agreement for engineering services between City and the Consultant chosen therefor by City.

3.19 Mediation.

Disputes arising from this Agreement may be submitted to mediation if mutually agreeable to the Parties hereto. The type and process of mediation to be utilized shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Parties.

3.20 Successors and Assigns.

This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators and assigns of each Party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void.

3.21 Asbestos Certification.

Consultant shall certify to City, in writing and under penalty of perjury, that to the best of its knowledge, information and belief no asbestos -containing material or other material deemed to be hazardous by the state or federal government was specified as a buildi ng material in any construction document that the Consultant prepares for the Project. Consultant shall require all consultants who prepare any other documents for the Project to submit the same written certification. Consultant shall also assist the City in ensuring that contractors provide City with certification, in writing and under penalty of perjury, that to the best of their knowledge, information and belief no material furnished, installed or incorporated into the Project contains asbestos or any other material deemed to be hazardous by the state or federal government. These certifications shall be part of the final Project submittal. Consultant shall include statements in its specifications that materials containing asbestos or any other material deemed to be hazardous by the state or federal government are not to be included.

3.22 No Third Party Rights.

This Agreement shall not create any rights in, or inure to the benefits of, any third party except as expressly provided herein.

3.23 Governing Law.

This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in San Bernardino County. 300
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -20-

3.24 Exhibits and Recitals.

All exhibits and recitals contained herein and attached hereto are material parts of this Agreement and are incorporated as if fully set forth.

3.25 Severability.

Should any provision in the Agreement be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.26 Non-Waiver.

None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either Party, unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing.

3.27 Safety.

Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of its employees, consultant and subcontractors appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed.

3.28 Harassment Policy.

Consultant shall provide a copy of the City's Harassment Policy to each of its employees assigned to perform the tasks under this Agreement. Consultant shall submit to the City's Personnel Manager a statement signed by each of its employees who are assigned to perform the Services under this Agreement certifying receipt of City's Harassment Policy and certifying that they have read the Harassment Policy. A finding by the City that any of Consultant's employees has harassed a City employee shall be grounds for appropriate discipline, up to and including such employee's removal from performance of this Agreement at City's request.

3.29 Delivery of Notices.

All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective Parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective Parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

CITY:

City of Ontario
303 East “B” Street
Ontario, CA 91764
Attn: Dennis Mejia, P.E., Utilities Engineering
Manager, OMUC
CONSULTANT:
8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

Attn: Matt Kunkle

Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the Party 301
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -21-

at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.30 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.31 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants.

City reserves right to employ other consultants, including designers, in connection with this Project or other projects.

3.32 Prohibited Interests.

3.32.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.

3.32.2 Conflict of Interest . For the term of this Agreement, no director, official, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.33 Equal Opportunity Employment.

Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or any other classification protected by federal or state law.

Such non -discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s minority business enterprise program, affirmative action plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.34 Labor Certification.

By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.35 Subcontracting.

As specified in this Agreement, Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to each and every provision of this Agreement.
302
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -22-

3.36 Supplemental Conditions.

Any supplemental conditions shall be attached as an exhibit to this Agreement, and that exhibit shall be incorporated herein by reference.

3.37 Entire Agreement.

This Agreement, with its exhibits, contains the entire agreement of the Parties hereto, and supersedes any and all other prior or contemporaneous negotiations, understandings and oral or written agreements between the Parties hereto. Each Party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. Furthermore, any modification of this Agreement shall only be effective if in writing signed by all Parties hereto.

SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE
303
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) -23-

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO
AND WESTLAND GROUP, INC.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF ONTARIO WestLAND Group, Inc.

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND
Secretary OR Treasurer REQUIRED]

Approved By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
Approved as to Form:

_____________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

Attested By:

City Clerk

304
46700.00100\40935196.1

BB&K (2024) Exhibit A-1

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.

1.1 Basic Services. Consultant agrees to perform all the necessary professional architectural, engineering (e.g. mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural, site engineering, and any other necessary engineering services mutually agreeable to the Parties) and construction administration services for the Project in a timely and professional manner, consistent with the standards of the profession, including those provided for herein.

1.2 Exclusions from Basic Services. The following services shall be excluded from the basic services listed above: “N/A”, Not applicable

1.3 Communication with City. Consultant shall participate in consultations and conferences with authorized representatives of City and/or other local, regional, or state agencies concerned with the Project, which may be necessary for the completion of the Project or the development of the drawi ngs, specifications and documents in accordance with the applicable standards and requirements of law and the City. Such consultations and conferences shall continue throughout the planning and construction of the Project and the contractor’s warranty period. Consultant shall take direction only from the City’s Representative, or any other representative specifically designated by the City for this Project, including any construction manager hired by the City.

1.4 Coordination and Cooperation with Construction Manager. The City may hire a construction manager to administer and coordinate all or any part of the Project on its behalf. If the City does so, it shall provide a copy of its agreement with the construction manager so that the Consultant will be fully aware of the duties and responsibilities of the construction manager.

The Consultant shall cooperate with the construction manager and respond to any requests or directives authorized by the City to be made or given by the construction manager. The Consultant shall request clarification from the City in writing if the Consultant should have any questions regarding the authority of the construction manager. 305

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

Omar Gonzalez
Ontario Municipal Utilities Company
1333 S Bon View Avenue,
Ontario, CA 91761

Re: WLG’s Ontario Ranch Road (ORR) Scope of Work

WestLAND Group, Inc. (WLG) is pleased to submit its Scope of Work and Fees for the Ontario Ranch Road (ORR) Design Services project. The proposed services are intended to support the design survey, utility locating, planning, engineering design, utility coordination, environmental compliance, right-of-way, and final PS&E development necessary to advance this critical infrastructure corridor.

As a long-standing partner to the City of Ontario, WLG understands the importance of the Ontario Ranch buildout and the infrastructure improvements needed to support the City's continued growth. WLG appreciates the opportunity to continue contributing to the success of this transformative area and looks forward to supporting OMUC and the City of Ontario in delivering this important project.

To provide a comprehensive and multidisciplinary team, WLG has assembled a highly qualified group of subconsultants to support key project components. The team includes JLC for hydrology and drainage engineering; HELIX Environmental Planning for environmental review, permitting, and regulatory compliance; Converse Consultants (Converse) for geotechnical engineering; Rende Consulting Group (RCG) and SPECS for bridge, tunnel, retaining wall, and structural engineering; Epic Land Solutions for right-of-way acquisition support; Hunter Landscape for landscape architecture and irrigation design; Salas O'Brien for architectural lighting and electrical engineering; Craftwater for Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Section 408 coordination and permitting support; and Moran Utility Services (Moran) for dry utility planning, coordination, and relocation services.

Together, this team provides the specialized expertise necessary to successfully deliver the roadway, utility, bridge, drainage, environmental, and right-of-way components of the Ontario Ranch Road improvements.

The proposal is signed by one of WLG's owners, Glenn Chung, PE, QSD/P. Should there be any questions regarding the proposal, please contact Siara MacKinney, PE, Director of Land Development, at 909.403.5647 or [email protected].

WLG appreciates OMUC's consideration and looks forward to the opportunity to be of service.

Sincerely,

Glenn M. Chung PE, QSD/P
President / Principal
306

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

Ontario Ranch Road (ORR) Scope of Work

Project Administration

Project Management
WLG’s Project Manager will serve as the primary point of contact for the City throughout the duration of the project. The Project Manager will lead coordination with the City, WLG’s design team, and subconsultants; manage staffing and scheduling; monitor project controls; and facilitate resolution of design, technical, schedule, and budget-related items. WLG will conduct coordination meetings at key project milestones and as needed to review design progress, discuss technical reports, address plan check comments, and confirm action items.

WLG’s Project Manager will prepare and submit progress reports summarizing completed work, project issues, schedule status, budget status, upcoming tasks, and required City or consultant action items. At a minimum, progress reporting will include project schedule updates, percentage of task completion, budget status, out-of- scope authorizations, design consultant action items, and City action items.

Project Meetings
WLG will attend and facilitate project meetings during all phases of the project, including but not limited to field review, design development, agency coordination, and plan review. Meetings may be held at City offices, virtually, or in the field, as needed, to review technical findings, confirm design direction, resolve project constraints, and coordinate upcoming submittals. WLG will prepare meeting agendas and meeting minutes documenting key decisions, discussion items, and action items.

Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
WLG will implement a formal QA/QC process throughout the design and project management phases. A qualified WLG quality control engineer with relevant roadway, drainage, utility, and construction experience will review the design documents at established milestones. The QA/QC process will include interdisciplinary reviews of plans, technical reports, calculations, subconsultant work products, utility coordination items, constructability considerations, and consistency with City standards and project requirements.

As-Built Data Collection and Research
WLG will compile and review available record information provided by the City and applicable agencies to establish a comprehensive project database for the Ontario Ranch Road corridor. This effort will include review of available street, storm drain, sewer, domestic water, recycled water, utility, right-of-way, tract map, and record drawing information. WLG will also request and catalog available atlas maps, conduit maps, and utility records from applicable utility owners for use in preparing the project basemap and identifying potential utility conflicts.

WLG will prepare preliminary utility findings and coordinate with utility owners and applicable agencies for review prior to final design. Utility coordination is anticipated to include, but may not be limited to, coordination 307

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

California Class A General Engineering Contractor License, CSLB# 1152732 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P: 888.787.1668 | www.westlandgroup.net
Page | 3
Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning | Utility Locating | Potholing A Certified CPUC MBE Engineering Firm
with IEUA, City of Chino, Zenith Pipeline, San Bernardino County, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, regional transportation agencies, dry utility providers, and other affected utility owners.

Design Engineering Services

Street Improvements
WLG will provide roadway design services for Ontario Ranch Road (ORR) from Euclid Avenue to Archibald Avenue, encompassing approximately 17,500 linear feet of ultimate corridor improvements. Design services will include preparation of plan and profile improvement plans and supporting engineering documents required for project approval and construction.

Consistent with the City's requirements, WLG will prepare two separate PS&E packages:

Ultimate Improvement Plans depicting the full build-out condition based on a 160-foot ultimate right- of-way, 130-foot curb-to-curb roadway width, a 26-foot landscaped median, and four travel lanes in each direction.

Construction Plans depicting the initial construction phase without last-lane improvements. The construction plans will generally include three travel lanes in each direction and omit the future outer lane improvements, curb and gutter, sidewalk, parkway improvements, parkway landscaping, neighborhood edge improvements, street lighting, and fiber optic infrastructure associated with future development.

Roadway design will include all intersections along the ORR corridor, including Euclid, Sultana, Campus, Bon View, Grove, Walker, Baker, Vineyard, Carpenter, and Hellman. Intersection design will incorporate required roadway transitions, connections to existing and planned north-south facilities, future paper streets, and temporary barricade treatments where applicable. Street cross-sections will be provided at 50’ intervals along the entire length of Ontario Ranch Road, from Euclid Avenue to the join west of Archibald Avenue.

WLG will coordinate roadway geometry, intersection layouts, and future transit accommodations with the City, Regional Transportation Agencies, and the traffic engineering consultant. Traffic signal design, signing, and striping recommendations will be incorporated based on the recommendations of the City's separately retained traffic consultant. If required by the traffic study, bicycle lane striping and associated pavement markings will be incorporated into the final roadway design. A schematic layout for the street lights will also be shown for reference on the street improvement plans for future development coordination.

Domestic Water
WLG will provide plan and profile design services for the domestic water system improvements in Euclid Avenue from Eucalyptus Avenue to Ontario Ranch Road and will continue along Ontario Ranch Road (ORR) from Euclid Avenue to the City of Ontario CIP line at Bon View Avenue, then it will continue from Grove Avenue to the existing potable water facilities west of the Cucamonga Channel. Design services will include a single domestic water transmission main, utility crossings, appurtenances, and connections to existing and planned facilities.

308

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

California Class A General Engineering Contractor License, CSLB# 1152732 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P: 888.787.1668 | www.westlandgroup.net
Page | 4
Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning | Utility Locating | Potholing A Certified CPUC MBE Engineering Firm
The design will incorporate required fire hydrants, blowoffs, air release valves, and other system appurtenances necessary to support operation of the transmission main. Side-street water main extensions beyond those necessary for system connectivity are excluded from this scope.

WLG will prepare a hydraulic modeling analysis in accordance with City of Ontario Water Master Plan criteria to evaluate ultimate maximum day, peak hour demand, and maximum day plus fire flow conditions. The hydraulic model will generally be bounded by Euclid Avenue, Archibald Avenue, Eucalyptus Avenue, and Schaefer Avenue.

The design will incorporate and coordinate with previously designed Center Park Project water improvements between Grove Avenue and Walker Avenue. Metered service applications and utility agency approvals will be coordinated through the City.

Plan design will include layout of water appurtenances (FH, BO, AV) and street connection stubs to Sultana, Campus, Bon View, Grove, Walker, Vineyard, Carpenter, and Hellman. Water connections to side streets will extend north and south of the CL of ORR to the ultimate ECR/BCR. All stubs provided will be per City of Ontario master plan location and size as required.

Pressure reducing valve (PRV) design is excluded from this scope.

Recycled Water
WLG will provide plan and profile design services for recycled water improvements along ORR from Euclid Avenue to the existing recycled water facilities west of the Cucamonga Channel. Design services will include pipeline alignments, recycled water appurtenances, utility crossings, and future service connections.

The recycled water system will include connection stubs at Euclid, Bon View, Grove, Walker, Vineyard, Carpenter, and Hellman. Side-street improvements will extend to accommodate ultimate roadway and development conditions. All stubs provided will be per City of Ontario master plan location and size as required.

A new recycled water loop connection will be evaluated and designed within Euclid Avenue between Eucalyptus Avenue and ORR. Hydraulic modeling will be performed utilizing current City of Ontario Water Master Plan criteria to evaluate future demand conditions, and ultimate system performance within the project area.

The design will include coordination with the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) and the City to establish required system connections, utility clearances, and operating requirements. Applications for recycled water service connections will be coordinated through the City.

Pressure reducing valve (PRV) design is excluded from this scope.

Sewer
WLG will provide a sewer study to evaluate potential east-west public sewer improvements requested to serve the ORR corridor and adjacent development areas. Final limits and system requirements will be coordinated with Ontario Municipal Utilities Company (OMUC).

309

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

California Class A General Engineering Contractor License, CSLB# 1152732 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P: 888.787.1668 | www.westlandgroup.net
Page | 5
Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning | Utility Locating | Potholing A Certified CPUC MBE Engineering Firm
WLG will prepare a sewer hydraulic capacity analysis and technical memorandum utilizing master-planned sewer flow projections provided by OMUC. The hydraulic evaluation will confirm system capacity requirements, identify downstream constraints, and establish pipe sizing recommendations for the proposed sewer network.

Optional Sewer Improvements
WLG may provide final plan and profile design services for the following master-planned sewer improvements with extension of public sewer facilities from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR and generally extending north beyond the ultimate ECR/BCR to get the final manhole out of the intersections. All stubs provided will be per City of Ontario master plan location and size as required.

Euclid Avenue: Design of the proposed 15-inch VCP sewer collection system from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR. Portions of this design have been initiated under Project PM 20714 and may be advanced to final design and approval.

Sultana Avenue: Design of the proposed 15-inch VCP sewer collection system from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR.

Campus Avenue: Design of the proposed 15-inch VCP sewer collection system from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR. Existing Center Park design efforts may be incorporated and advanced to completion if not previously approved.

Walker Avenue: Design of the proposed 15-inch VCP sewer collection system from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR. Existing Center Park design efforts may be incorporated and advanced to completion if not previously approved.

Baker Avenue: Design of the proposed 15-inch VCP sewer collection system from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR.

Storm Drain
WLG will provide storm drain design services for the master-planned drainage facilities within ORR from Euclid Avenue to Archibald Avenue. Design services will include the preparation of storm drain improvement plans, hydrologic analyses, hydraulic calculations, utility coordination, and supporting technical documentation.

The storm drain system will be designed to connect to the Euclid, Campus, Bon View, Grove, Walker, Hellman, and Cucamonga Channel drainage systems and will incorporate dry-line provisions for future master-planned facilities not yet constructed. WLG will evaluate both ultimate and interim drainage conditions to ensure compatibility with planned regional infrastructure and future development. All stubs provided will be per City of Ontario master plan location and size as required.

The storm drain design will incorporate previously completed Center Park drainage improvements between Campus Avenue and Walker Avenue and will evaluate future downstream conveyance requirements where master-planned facilities remain incomplete.

Optional Storm Drain Improvements
WLG may provide final design services for the following master-planned storm drain improvements:

310

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

California Class A General Engineering Contractor License, CSLB# 1152732 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P: 888.787.1668 | www.westlandgroup.net
Page | 6
Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning | Utility Locating | Potholing A Certified CPUC MBE Engineering Firm
Euclid Avenue: Design of the proposed 102-inch RCP storm drain from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR.

Portions of this design have been initiated under Project PM 20714 and may be advanced to final design and approval.

Campus Avenue: Design of the proposed 60-inch RCP storm drain from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR.

Existing Center Park design efforts may be incorporated and advanced to completion if not previously approved.

Bon View Avenue: Design of the proposed 96-inch RCP storm drain from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR.

Existing Center Park design efforts may be incorporated and advanced to completion if not previously approved.

Walker Avenue: Design of the proposed 108-inch RCP storm drain from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR.

Existing Center Park design efforts may be incorporated and advanced to completion if not previously approved.

Hellman Avenue: Design of the proposed master-planned 11-foot by 6-foot storm drain facility from Eucalyptus Avenue to ORR.

Hydrology/Drainage

Drainage Research and Review - Under WLG's direction, the drainage team will compile and review available drainage studies, approved tentative maps, storm drain plans, hydrology reports, and watershed documentation to identify existing drainage constraints and establish design criteria for the project.

Offsite Hydrology Analysis – WLG’s subconsultant will perform watershed analyses for approximately 1,500 to 2,000 acres tributary to ORR. The analysis will evaluate both existing and ultimate development conditions and quantify potential impacts to upstream and downstream properties. Hydrologic modeling will be prepared in accordance with the latest San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual.

Roadway Hydrology - WLG’s subconsultant will evaluate runoff generated within the proposed roadway corridor and develop hydrologic models for approximately 17,500 feet of roadway improvements.

Analyses will include drainage area delineation, inlet spacing evaluations, and roadway drainage capacity assessments for both 10-year and 100-year storm events.

Conceptual Drainage and Water Quality Plan - WLG’s subconsultant will prepare a conceptual drainage and water quality plan identifying required storm drain infrastructure, water quality treatment measures, interim drainage solutions, and future facility connections necessary to support corridor improvements.

Hydrology and Hydraulic Report - WLG’s subconsultant will prepare a comprehensive Hydrology and Hydraulic Report documenting watershed analyses, runoff calculations, storm drain sizing, inlet design, hydraulic modeling, street capacity evaluations, and supporting mapping exhibits.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) - WLG’s subconsultant water quality team will prepare a Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the current MS4 Permit and City of Ontario requirements. The WQMP will identify permanent BMPs, treatment sizing calculations, operations and maintenance requirements, and long-term compliance measures. Infiltration testing for proposed BMP facilities will be provided by the City.

311

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

California Class A General Engineering Contractor License, CSLB# 1152732 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P: 888.787.1668 | www.westlandgroup.net
Page | 7
Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning | Utility Locating | Potholing A Certified CPUC MBE Engineering Firm
Optional Hydraulic Analysis & Reports
WLG may provide the following services:

Cucamonga Creek Hydraulic Analysis - WLG's hydraulic team will prepare a detailed HEC-RAS hydraulic analysis of approximately 3,000 feet of the Cucamonga Creek Channel to evaluate existing and proposed bridge crossing conditions. Analyses will be prepared in accordance with USACE requirements and coordinated with San Bernardino County Flood Control District.

Cucamonga Creek Technical Hydraulic Report - A separate technical report will document pre-project and post-project hydraulic performance of the proposed Cucamonga Creek crossing and demonstrate no adverse impacts to channel operations, conveyance capacity, or regulatory requirements.

ACOE Support Services
WLG, in partnership with its subconsultant, Craftwater, will provide technical review support associated with Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Section 408 permitting requirements for improvements within and adjacent to the Cucamonga Creek Channel.

Craftwater will review and provide technical comments on up to three ACOE Section 408 permit submittal packages prior to submission to the ACOE for review and approval. Anticipated submittals include geotechnical investigations associated with the proposed bridge abutment locations, demolition of the existing Ontario Ranch Road Bridge crossing over the Cucamonga Creek Channel, and construction of the proposed replacement bridge crossing.

Craftwater will coordinate with WLG and the project team to review permit documentation for consistency with ACOE Section 408 requirements and provide technical input to support permit application package development prior to agency submittal.

Environmental Services
WLG, in partnership with its environmental subconsultant, HELIX Environmental Planning, will provide environmental planning, documentation, permitting, and regulatory coordination services for the Ontario Ranch Road (ORR) corridor from Euclid Avenue to Archibald Avenue. Environmental services will support roadway widening, utility improvements, drainage facilities, bridge replacement, right-of-way acquisition, and associated infrastructure improvements and will be integrated with WLG's engineering design effort to facilitate project delivery, environmental clearance, and agency approvals.

WLG and HELIX will review available environmental documentation, planning studies, technical reports, utility master plans, and City records to identify environmental constraints, permitting requirements, and regulatory considerations associated with the proposed improvements. Environmental services will support both the geotechnical investigation phase and ultimate project implementation phase, including environmental clearances necessary for field investigations, bridge design, utility investigations, roadway improvements, and permitting activities.

HELIX will prepare environmental documentation in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as applicable. Services may include preparation of a CEQA 312

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

California Class A General Engineering Contractor License, CSLB# 1152732 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P: 888.787.1668 | www.westlandgroup.net
Page | 8
Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning | Utility Locating | Potholing A Certified CPUC MBE Engineering Firm
Notice of Exemption (NOE) for preliminary geotechnical investigations, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Environmental Assessment (EA), supporting technical studies, mitigation measures, agency coordination, public review support, responses to comments, and final environmental documentation necessary to support project approval and implementation.

Environmental services will support both the geotechnical investigation phase and final project entitlements.

Early environmental efforts will include biological constraints analyses, environmental clearances, jurisdictional delineations, and regulatory permitting necessary to facilitate geotechnical investigations within the Cucamonga Creek corridor and bridge replacement area. Subsequent environmental services will support CEQA/NEPA compliance, environmental impact analyses, mitigation development, and regulatory approvals for the ultimate roadway, bridge, drainage, and utility improvements.

Biological resource services may include general biological surveys, jurisdictional delineations, biological constraints analyses, focused species surveys, nesting bird surveys, burrowing owl surveys, bat surveys, rare plant surveys, tree inventories, biological technical reports, biological monitoring, and environmental compliance support during construction. Biological services will support environmental clearance, impact assessments, regulatory permitting, and project implementation activities within the roadway corridor and Cucamonga Creek bridge replacement area.

Cultural resource services may include archaeological surveys, records searches, Native American Heritage Commission coordination, cultural resources technical reports, historical resource assessments, DPR documentation, Section 106 consultation support, and evaluation of the existing Ontario Ranch Road Bridge and Cucamonga Creek Channel for potential historic significance. Services may also include tribal coordination and Assembly Bill 52 consultation support, as requested by the City, and preparation of documentation necessary to support CEQA, NEPA, and federal permitting requirements.

Additional environmental technical studies may include paleontological resources assessments, air quality and greenhouse gas analyses, noise and vibration studies, conformity analyses, and other supporting environmental studies necessary to support CEQA, NEPA, and regulatory permitting requirements. Environmental evaluations will include assessment of project impacts, development of mitigation measures, and preparation of supporting technical documentation required by reviewing agencies.

For the proposed Cucamonga Creek Bridge improvements, WLG and HELIX will provide permitting support and agency coordination associated with applicable Section 401, Section 404, Section 1602, and Section 408 approvals, including coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and other applicable agencies. Services may include jurisdictional delineations, permit application preparation, permit processing support, regulatory agency coordination, permit compliance documentation, pre-application meetings, permit negotiations, Section 408 environmental compliance support, environmental assessments, and preparation of environmental information necessary to facilitate agency approvals and permit authorizations.

As an optional service, WLG and HELIX may provide construction-phase environmental compliance support, including worker environmental awareness training (WEAP), biological monitoring, nesting bird and species 313

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

California Class A General Engineering Contractor License, CSLB# 1152732 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P: 888.787.1668 | www.westlandgroup.net
Page | 9
Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning | Utility Locating | Potholing A Certified CPUC MBE Engineering Firm
compliance surveys, permit compliance verification, agency coordination, environmental inspections, and construction-phase environmental documentation.

Right-Of-Way Services
WLG will provide right-of-way engineering and acquisition support services for the Ontario Ranch Road corridor from Euclid Avenue to Archibald Avenue. Services will include preparation of survey control, right-of-way mapping, property impacts, easement documentation, and acquisition exhibits necessary to support ultimate roadway improvements.

WLG will prepare a centerline study, record of survey, and comprehensive right-of-way mapping for the Ontario Ranch Road corridor from Euclid Avenue to Archibald Avenue. Services will include records research and review of available maps, deeds, record drawings, and right-of-way documentation from the City of Ontario, City of Chino, San Bernardino County Surveyor, and other applicable agencies to support boundary, right-of-way, and acquisition determinations. Right-of-way mapping will identify existing dedications, easements, property boundaries, and ultimate roadway requirements. Based on preliminary evaluations, approximately 25 parcels may require additional right-of-way dedication; however, the final number may be reduced as adjacent development projects dedicate right-of-way consistent with approved development conditions.

WLG will prepare plats, legal descriptions, irrevocable offers of dedication (IODs), temporary construction easements (TCEs), permanent easements, and supporting right-of-way documents necessary to facilitate property acquisition activities.

Under WLG's direction, the right-of-way team will coordinate title research, valuation support, property owner notifications, acquisition exhibits, and offer package preparation. Negotiation support services will include coordination with property owners, preparation of revised exhibits, and participation in project meetings as necessary to facilitate right-of-way acquisition.

Condemnation proceedings and eminent domain actions, if required, will be performed by the City and are excluded from this scope.

Right-Of-Way Acquisition Support
WLG, in partnership with its right-of-way acquisition subconsultant, Epic Land Solutions will provide right-of-way acquisition support services necessary to facilitate implementation of the Ontario Ranch Road corridor improvements between Euclid Avenue and the bridge west of Archibald Avenue.

Epic Land Solutions will assist the City with acquisition of required right-of-way dedications, temporary construction easements (TCEs), and other property interests necessary to support roadway construction activities. Services will include coordination with affected property owners, tenants, City staff, and the project team to facilitate right-of-way acquisition efforts and support timely project implementation.

Epic Land Solutions will also include review and coordination of project-related impacts with affected property owners and tenants, including impacts to fencing, existing structures, access, drainage features, temporary berms or basins, and other site-specific improvements associated with project construction. 314

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

Epic Land Solutions will participate in meetings and discussions with property owners, tenants, City staff, and WLG to review proposed improvements, address property-specific concerns, coordinate acquisition requirements, and facilitate implementation of the corridor improvements.

Epic Land Solutions will provide appraisal services to support acquisition activities associated with the Ontario Ranch Road corridor improvements between Euclid Avenue and the bridge west of Archibald Avenue. Services will include coordination and attendance at a pre-appraisal meeting with the City, preparation of Notices of Decision to Appraise (NODA), property inspections, market research and analysis, investigation of property characteristics and applicable land use information, and preparation of up to twenty-five (25) USPAP-compliant appraisal reports to provide opinions of fair market value for proposed acquisitions and support the City's determination of just compensation. These services will support the property acquisition activities necessary for project implementation.

Structural Engineering Services
WLG's structural engineering subconsultants, Rende Consulting Group (RCG) and SPECS, will provide structural engineering services supporting the Ontario Ranch Road improvements at the Cucamonga Creek crossing. RCG will serve as the lead bridge structural engineer for the replacement of the existing westbound Cucamonga Creek Bridge, while SPECS will provide structural engineering services for the bicycle and pedestrian tunnel extension and associated Redi-Rock retaining walls adjacent to the bridge crossing.

RCG will coordinate with WLG, the geotechnical engineer, hydraulic engineer, SPECS, and the City throughout project development. Structural services will include bridge type selection, preliminary engineering, final bridge design, independent check calculations, structural calculations, bridge demolition plans, cost estimating, technical special provisions, and agency coordination. RCG will prepare a Structure Type Selection Study and Memorandum, General Plan Sheet, and General Plan Estimate to evaluate and recommend a bridge configuration consistent with the recently completed eastbound Cucamonga Creek Bridge. Evaluations will consider constructability, utility constraints, environmental impacts, maintenance of traffic, permitting requirements, and overall project implementation strategies.

Final bridge design will include demolition of the existing westbound bridge and construction of a replacement single-span structure designed in accordance with current Caltrans and AASHTO design standards, applicable geotechnical recommendations, hydraulic requirements, and regulatory agency criteria. Structural design services will include preparation of bridge plans, design calculations, independent check calculations, quantity calculations, engineer's estimates, and technical special provisions necessary to support project approval, bidding, and construction. The bridge design will be coordinated with WLG's roadway, drainage, utility, environmental, and permitting teams to ensure compatibility with project requirements and regulatory approvals.

SPECS will provide structural design services for the extension of the existing bicycle and pedestrian tunnel and associated Redi-Rock retaining walls adjacent to the Cucamonga Creek crossing. Services will include civil design coordination, geotechnical coordination, project meetings, preparation of structural calculations, tunnel and retaining wall plans, technical specifications, QA/QC reviews, quantity calculations, and engineer's cost estimates. Tunnel improvements will include structural plans, foundation plans, sections, details, and end 315

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

WLG will prepare project-level engineer's estimates, bid quantities, special technical provisions, and contract documents consistent with City of Ontario standards, Caltrans Standard Specifications, and applicable structural design requirements.

Supporting the bridge improvements, WLG’s subconsultant, Salas O’Brien, will provide architectural lighting design as well as electrical engineering services for the proposed westbound ORR bridge. All lighting will be coordinated with the eastbound bridge to ensure continuity.

Dry Utility Coordination Services
WLG's dry utility subconsultant, Moran Utility Services (Moran), will provide comprehensive dry utility planning, coordination, and utility relocation support services for the Ontario Ranch Road (ORR) corridor between Euclid Avenue and Archibald Avenue. Services will include master planning, utility research, field investigations, stakeholder coordination, utility relocation planning, and preparation of dry utility composite exhibits to support roadway, bridge, utility, and infrastructure improvements.

Under WLG's management and coordination, Moran will work closely with Southern California Edison (SCE), telecommunication providers, cable television providers, Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), and other affected utility owners to identify existing facilities, evaluate relocation requirements, assess service impacts, and support future infrastructure planning. Dry utility coordination efforts will consider ultimate roadway improvements, transmission and distribution system relocations, service continuity requirements, future development needs, and opportunities for consolidated utility corridors.

Moran will support the relocation of SCE transmission facilities, evaluate overhead-to-underground conversion opportunities for distribution and communication systems, prepare dry utility composite plans, and provide applicant design coordination services associated with utility relocation improvements. Services will also include bridge utility coordination, support for SCE consent-to-construct requirements, easement coordination, and coordination of dry utility improvements associated with the Cucamonga Creek crossing. Additionally, Moran will provide research, consulting, and coordination for dry utility service refeeds associated with the relocation of existing systems, including electric, communication, and natural gas services as needed. Efforts will include coordination for approximately 50 properties that may require revised dry utility service connections, with support for up to 50 individual service refeed requests.

Moran will coordinate existing customer service refeeds associated with electric, communication, and natural gas facilities impacted by utility relocations. Services will also include coordination of new utility service connections, service extensions, meter applications, and utility requirements for irrigation controllers, traffic signal infrastructure, street lighting facilities, and other public improvements within the project corridor.

Services will include support for SoCalGas transmission line clearance requirements, consent-to-construct reviews, and future gas infrastructure planning within the project corridor. Efforts will include evaluation of main extensions and service stub opportunities necessary to support future development along Ontario Ranch Road.
316

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

Ultimate roadway lighting systems outside of the bridge limits are excluded from this scope and may be incorporated as a future phase or optional task. Lighting associated with the proposed westbound Cucamonga Creek Bridge improvements will be incorporated into the bridge design and coordinated with the structural engineering team.

Moran will support the development of constructable designs for the City’s fiber system. The fiber system design will be provided by others, with Moran’s efforts focused on accommodating the engineering of City-approved designs to support the construction of associated Ontario Fiber improvements. Services will include consulting, coordination, preparation of dry utility composite plans, specifications, and cost estimates, with locations coordinated directly with the City of Ontario broadband team. This effort includes support for up to two independent work orders; should additional work orders be required to support the planned improvements, an addendum will be provided.

Geotechnical Engineering Services
WLG's geotechnical engineering subconsultant, Converse Consultants (Converse), will provide geotechnical engineering services to support roadway, utility, drainage, bridge, retaining wall, and associated infrastructure improvements throughout the Ontario Ranch Road (ORR) corridor. Services will include existing document review, project setup, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, water percolation testing, and preparation of geotechnical recommendations to support final design.

Under WLG's direction, Converse will perform field investigations to evaluate subsurface conditions, pavement support characteristics, utility trench conditions, and earthwork requirements within the project limits. Field exploration is anticipated to include approximately 48 borings distributed throughout the corridor, bridge crossing, and proposed detention/retention basin locations. Borings will be alternated between eastbound and westbound roadway alignments to obtain representative subsurface data and support infrastructure design throughout the corridor.

Laboratory testing will be performed on collected soil samples to evaluate engineering properties and develop recommendations for pavement design, utility trench construction, earthwork, foundation support, and project constructability. Additional investigations will include water percolation testing to support drainage and detention/retention basin design.

For the proposed Cucamonga Creek Bridge improvements, Converse will perform subsurface investigations and provide foundation recommendations to support bridge, retaining wall, and associated structural improvements. Services will include preparation of foundation design parameters, seismic design criteria, earthwork recommendations, and construction considerations necessary to support final structural design.

Converse will prepare a Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) for roadway and utility improvements and a separate Bridge Foundation Report (BFR) for the proposed bridge improvements. Converse will also review 90% completed plans and specifications to confirm incorporation of geotechnical recommendations and provide a certification letter documenting conformance with the geotechnical design criteria.

317

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

Survey control will be established utilizing existing City benchmarks, monumentation, and State Plane Coordinate System control points. Horizontal and vertical control networks will support design development, utility mapping, right-of-way evaluations, and construction document preparation. WLG will coordinate with the Ardurra Group’s team regarding survey control, horizontal and vertical control networks, base mapping development, and integration of survey data necessary to support corridor design and utility coordination efforts.

Topographic surveying will be performed throughout the ORR corridor, adjacent intersections, side streets, utility crossings, bridge improvement areas, and the Cucamonga Creek channel crossing to document existing roadway conditions, utilities, drainage infrastructure, vegetation, structures, property features, and other improvements necessary for final design.

All survey data will be collected digitally and processed for integration into AutoCAD Civil 3D design platforms.

Deliverables will include topographic mapping, digital terrain models, control information, utility mapping, and record survey documentation.

Utility Locating Services
WLG will perform subsurface utility engineering (SUE) investigations and utility locating services to support design development and utility conflict resolution throughout the project corridor.

Utility locating services will include ground penetrating radar (GPR), electromagnetic locating, utility mapping, and field verification of existing underground utility infrastructure along Ontario Ranch Road between Euclid Avenue and Archibald Avenue, as well as key intersecting corridors. Utility investigations will be performed within roadway, intersection, and utility crossing areas necessary to support final design.

WLG will prepare utility base mapping and conflict identification exhibits documenting utility ownership, location, depth, size, and potential conflicts with proposed improvements. Findings will be incorporated into utility coordination and final design activities.

In addition, WLG will perform utility locating services along Grove Avenue between Riverside Drive and Eucalyptus Avenue to supplement corridor design efforts and support utility coordination for the proposed improvements. Services will include GPR, electromagnetic locating, utility mapping, and field verification of existing underground utility infrastructure within roadway, intersection, and utility crossing areas. Findings will be incorporated into utility base mapping.

Potholing Services
To support utility verification, the project includes an allowance for approximately 50 potholes at critical utility crossings, connections, and potential conflict locations. Potholing locations will be finalized during design based on utility coordination findings and SUE investigations. 318

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

Services will include development of two conceptual landscape alternatives for City review and selection, preparation of irrigation plans, landscape details, planting plans, and special feature enhancements consistent with City standards and corridor aesthetics.

Landscape improvements will focus on the proposed center median improvements, including special signage, gateway features, and wayfinding elements where appropriate.

Landscape and irrigation design within roadway parkways and future outer lane improvements is excluded from this scope.

Cost Estimating and Project Controls
WLG will prepare and maintain engineering cost estimates and coordinate with City’s construction management team throughout project development to support decision-making, budgeting, and project planning.

Cost estimates will be developed at key design milestones and refined as the project advances from preliminary engineering through final design. Estimates will generally range from Class 3 planning-level estimates to Class 1 definitive estimates for final PS&E submittals.

Separate cost opinions will be prepared for the ultimate roadway improvements, the initial construction-phase roadway improvements and Last Lane Improvements to support the City's implementation strategy.

Project controls will include schedule monitoring, budget tracking, milestone evaluations, risk identification, and regular reporting through WLG's project management process.

Contract Bid Specifications
WLG will provide final technical and special provisions for use by the City in preparing the contract bid package to cover site-specific work improvements. Final specifications will be presented in both book format and plan presentation for civil, structural, landscape, and electrical work. WLG and its design team will prepare bid schedules, engineer's estimates, and supporting documents necessary for project bidding and construction.

Separate special provision specifications will be prepared for each construction operation including Street, Sewer, Domestic Water, Recycled Water, and Storm Drain improvements. Bid schedules will be provided and separated by project work limits, project phasing requirements, or other means required to provide a comprehensive construction bid package.

Contract specifications for landscape, bridge construction, and City Fiber Optic systems will be provided by the project team and incorporated into the final bid specifications packages for City review and use.

319

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

California Class A General Engineering Contractor License, CSLB# 1152732 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P: 888.787.1668 | www.westlandgroup.net
Page | 15
Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning | Utility Locating | Potholing A Certified CPUC MBE Engineering Firm
Specifications will be consistent with City of Ontario standards, applicable utility requirements, Greenbook standard specifications, Caltrans special provisions, and industry’s best practices. Technical specifications will be coordinated across all design disciplines to provide a comprehensive and constructible set of contract documents supporting successful project delivery.

Bid Support Services
Upon completion of the final design phase, WLG and its subconsultants will provide bid support services to assist the City during project advertisement and procurement. Services may include preparation of addenda, responses to contractor requests for information (RFIs), clarification of design intent, and revisions to plans or specifications as directed by the City.

Construction Support Services
As an optional service, WLG and its subconsultants may provide construction support services during project implementation. Services may include responses to contractor RFIs, review of submittals, design clarifications, attendance at construction meetings, site visits, preparation of plan revisions, and review of record drawings and as-built documentation as requested by the City.

Assumptions and Exclusions
The following assumptions and exclusions apply to this scope of services:

Traffic forecasting and regional traffic analysis will be provided by the City's traffic engineering consultant.

Detailed dry utility design will be provided by the respective utility owners.

Construction surveying is excluded.

Geotechnical testing and observation during construction are excluded.

Bid support services are limited to the plan sets prepared under this contract.

WLG will prepare technical specifications and special provisions utilizing City of Ontario standards and applicable agency requirements.

Environmental studies during construction are not included at this time, they can be provided after more detailed phasing has been established.

Any well relocations are not part of the scope of services and will be considered as part of the additional services.

Deliverables
WLG will provide the following deliverables throughout the course of the project:

Preliminary Design Report (30%), Technical Memoranda and Reports Cost Analysis for last lane improvements
Existing Conditions and Constraints Memorandum
Design Criteria Memorandum
Environmental Constraints Memorandum – included as part of HELIX scope of services Utility Conflict and Relocation Memorandum
Utility Coordination Memorandum
320

Shaping communities by providing infrastructure solutions.

California Class A General Engineering Contractor License, CSLB# 1152732 8885 Haven Ave, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
P: 888.787.1668 | www.westlandgroup.net
Page | 16
Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning | Utility Locating | Potholing A Certified CPUC MBE Engineering Firm
Sewer Technical Memorandum
Hydrology and Hydraulic Report
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
IS/MND and Environmental Clearance Documentation – included as part of HELIX scope of services Hydraulic Modeling Analyses (Water and Recycled Water)
Survey Base Map – Included as part of the above services Utility Investigation Report – Included as part of the above services Utility Mapping – Included as part of the above services Preliminary Project Schedule – Included as part of the above services Preliminary Engineer's Cost Estimate – Included as part of the above services Recommend Street Layout
Recommend Utility Layout

Final Design Deliverables
Ultimate Improvement PS&E Package
Interim Construction PS&E Package
Water Improvement Plans
Recycled Water Improvement Plans
Sewer Improvement Plans
Drainage Improvement Plans
Bridge Type Selection Exhibit
Bridge Design Plans
Landscape and Irrigation Plans
Right-of-Way Acquisition Packages and Easement Documents Utility Clearance Documentation
60% Design Submittal
90% Design Submittal
100% Design Submittal
Final Engineer's Estimate
Technical Specifications
Special Provisions
Bid Schedule and Contract Documents

321
ID
Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Notice to Proceed Mon 10/12/26
2 Project Management 426 days Mon 10/12/26Mon 5/29/28
3 Data Research 130 days Mon 10/12/26Fri 4/9/27
4 Kick off Meeting 1 day Mon 10/12/26Mon 10/12/26
5 Right of Way Research/Control 15 days Mon 10/26/26Fri 11/13/26 6 Topographic Survey/Data Processing 25 days Mon 11/16/26Fri 12/18/26 7 Field Investigation 10 days Mon 12/21/26Fri 1/1/27
8 Utility Research 50 days Mon 11/9/26Fri 1/15/27
9 GPR Field Investigation/Processing 20 days Mon 12/14/26Fri 1/8/27 10 Dry Utility Planning 50 days Mon 11/9/26Fri 1/15/27
11 Prepare Base Plans 20 days Mon 1/4/27Fri 1/29/27
12 ACOE Preliminary Design Research 20 days Mon 11/23/26Fri 12/18/26 13 Geotechnical Field Exploration 30 days Mon 1/4/27Fri 2/12/27 14 Envrionmental Technical Studies 60 days Mon 1/18/27Fri 4/9/27 15 Preliminary Design (30%) 110 days Mon 2/1/27Fri 7/2/27 16 Street Improvement Conceptual Development50 days Mon 2/1/27Fri 4/9/27 17 Geotechnical - Office Testing 50 days Mon 2/15/27Fri 4/23/27 18 Prepare Hydrology Report 60 days Mon 2/8/27Fri 4/30/27 19 Prepare Record of Survey 35 days Mon 2/15/27Fri 4/2/27 20 DW Hydraulic Study 30 days Mon 2/22/27Fri 4/2/27
21 RW Hydraulic Study 25 days Mon 3/1/27Fri 4/2/27
22 Sewer Hydraulic Study 20 days Mon 3/8/27Fri 4/2/27
23 Preliminary DW Pipeline Design 30 days Mon 4/5/27Fri 5/14/27 24 Preliminary RW Pipeline Design 30 days Mon 4/5/27Fri 5/14/27 25 Preliminary Sewer Pipeline Design 30 days Mon 4/5/27Fri 5/14/27 26 Preliminary Storm Drain Pipeline Design45 days Mon 5/3/27Fri 7/2/27 27 Cucamonga Creek Bridge Selection Study40 days Mon 2/15/27Fri 4/9/27 28 Prepare Median Landscape Concepts20 days Mon 4/12/27Fri 5/7/27 29 Dry Utility Desgin Concepts 60 days Mon 4/12/27Fri 7/2/27 30 Environmental Report Processing/Approvals60 days Mon 4/12/27Fri 7/2/27 31 Project Study Report 25 days Mon 5/31/27Fri 7/2/27
32 City Review and Comments 20 days Mon 7/5/27Fri 7/30/27 33 Design Development (60%) 120 days Mon 7/5/27Fri 12/17/27 34 Street Improvement Development 90 days Mon 7/5/27Fri 11/5/27 35 DW Improvement Plans 60 days Mon 7/19/27Fri 10/8/27
36 RW Improvement Plans 45 days Mon 7/19/27Fri 9/17/27
37 Sewer Improvement Plans 40 days Mon 7/19/27Fri 9/10/27 38 Storm Drain Improvement Plans 50 days Mon 8/16/27Fri 10/22/27 39 SD Hydraulic Report 20 days Mon 9/20/27Fri 10/15/27
40 Prepare ROW Acquistion Documents (IOD)25 days Mon 8/23/27Fri 9/24/27 41 ROW Appraisal Services 60 days Mon 9/27/27Fri 12/17/27 42 Cucamonga Creek Bridge Plan Develeopment80 days Mon 8/16/27Fri 12/3/27 43 Retaining Wall/Bike Trail Tunnel Plan Development60 days Tue 9/7/27 Mon 11/29/27 44 Complete Utility Pothole Verification20 days Mon 9/20/27Fri 10/15/27 45 Draft Contract Specs/ Bid Schedule 25 days Mon 11/8/27Fri 12/10/27 46 ACOE Permit Review 80 days Mon 11/1/27Fri 2/18/28
47 City Review and Comments 20 days Mon 12/20/27Fri 1/14/28 48 Final Design (90%) 65 days Mon 12/20/27Fri 3/17/28
49 Street Improvement Design 60 days Mon 12/20/27Fri 3/10/28 50 DW Improvements 50 days Mon 12/20/27Fri 2/25/28
51 RW Improvements 50 days Mon 12/20/27Fri 2/25/28
52 Sewer Improvements 50 days Mon 12/20/27Fri 2/25/28
53 Storm Drain Improvements 45 days Mon 12/20/27Fri 2/18/28 54 Dry Utility Design 45 days Mon 1/17/28Fri 3/17/28
55 Contract Bid Documents 25 days Mon 2/14/28Fri 3/17/28 56 City Review and Comments 30 days Mon 3/20/28Fri 4/28/28 57 Final Plan Submittal (100%) 50 days Mon 3/20/28Fri 5/26/28 58 Final Street Plans 50 days Mon 3/20/28Fri 5/26/28
59 AOCE Permit Processing 50 days Mon 3/20/28Fri 5/26/28 60 Final Contract Bid Documents 20 days Mon 5/1/28Fri 5/26/28 61 Final Contract Document Submittal 1 day Mon 5/29/28Mon 5/29/28 Oct '26 Nov '26 Dec '26 Jan '27 Feb '27 Mar '27 Apr '27 May '27 Jun '27 Jul '27 Aug '27 Sep '27 Oct '27 Nov '27 Dec '27 Jan '28 Feb '28 Mar '28 Apr '28 May '28 Jun '28 Jul '28 Aug '28 Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Progress
Manual Progress
City of Ontario
Ontrio Ranch Street Improvements
Eulcid Ave to Archibald Ave

Page 1 ends

Ontario City CouncilSeptember 15, 2026

Ontario City Council
September 15, 2026