Urgency Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD
ORDINANCE NO. ____________
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING CHAPTER 22, ARTICLE VIII OF THE OXNARD CITY CODE TO COMPLY
WITH AND ENFORCE EMERGENCY DROUGHT-RELATED WATER USE RESTRICTIONS WHEREAS, the Oxnard City Council adopted a water waste ordinance, codified in Chapter 22, Article VIII of the Oxnard City Code (OCC), and in 2020 adopted a Water Shortage Contingency Plan; and
WHEREAS, OCC Chapter 22 Article VIII includes permanent water waste measures, and the City Council desires to implement emergency water waste measures; and WHEREAS good cause exists pursuant to Government Code section 36937, subdivision (b), to implement Ordinance No._______ as an Urgency Ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 36934 for the reasons listed below; and
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency exists in all California counties due to ongoing drought conditions; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2022 the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) declared that State Water Project (SWP) allocations would be reduced from 15% to 5%; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2022, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-7-22 requiring all water providers to implement, at minimum, Stage 2 of their Water Shortage Contingency Plans (WSCP) and reduce water use by 20-30%; and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2022, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Board (MWD) adopted an Emergency Water Conservation Program, declaring a Water Shortage Emergency in SWP dependent areas due to insufficient supplies to meet current water demands and that the Emergency Water Conservation Program shall continue through June 30, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on April 27, 2022, Calleguas Municipal Water District (CMWD), a SWP dependent agency, declared a Stage 3 Water Shortage requiring all water users within the service area to immediately reduce water use by up to 30%; and
WHEREAS, the City receives up to 40% of its water from the CMWD; and 326
Urgency Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
WHEREAS, on May 17, 2022, the Oxnard City Council approved Resolution No. 15,569 declaring a Stage 2 water shortage exists within the city; and WHEREAS, on June 10 2022, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted an emergency regulation, effective immediately, prohibiting the irrigation of non-functional turf with potable water at commercial, industrial, and institutional sites including homeowners’ associations, condominiums, retirement communities, and other housing developments comprised of individually owned units and shared facilities. The SWRCB regulation defines non-functional turf as turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events; and WHEREAS, the City intends to reduce customer water use during emergency drought conditions to comply with state and local water conservation mandates, in addition to the conservation measures listed in the Oxnard Water Shortage Contingency Plan, by implementing this Urgency Ordinance which limits outdoor irrigation and implements other water conservation measures; and
WHEREAS, all other permanent water conservation measures in the Oxnard City Code remain in effect; and
WHEREAS, the State of California, MWD, and/or CMWD will likely issue additional water use restrictions , and the City Manager / Director of Emergency Services is authorized to implement those requirements and shall submit additional water conservation measures to the City Council for ratification in its discretion at a future meeting; and WHEREAS, Any violation of this Urgency Ordinance shall be subject to civil fines and administrative review and appeal procedures set forth in OCC Chapter 7, Article III; and WHEREAS, The City Council determines that the OCC must be further reviewed and possibly revised to protect the public against potential negative health, safety, and welfare impacts associated with the severe water shortage if water conservation goals are not achieved or additional conservation measures are mandated; and
WHEREAS, The City intends to study, within a reasonable time, amendments required to the OCC to effectively meet state and local water conservation mandates; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 36937 authorizes the adoption of an urgency ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
327
Urgency Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
Part 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The findings and determinations reflected above are true and correct, and are incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein as the cause and foundation for the action taken by and through this Urgency Ordinance.
Part 2. Codified Amendment. The City Clerk is directed to request that the publisher of the City Code add thereto the amendments listed in Part 3 of this Ordinance to Chapter 22, Article VIII as set forth below.
Part 3. Addition to the Oxnard Municipal Code. The Oxnard Municipal Code is amended by renumbering current Sections 22-137 through 22-142 to read as Sections 22-138 through 22-143 in Chapter 22, Article VIII; creating a new Section 22-137 to include emergency water waste provisions; and amending new Sections 22-138, 22-139, 22-140 (formerly Sections 22-137, 22-138, 22-139) in Chapter 22 Article VIII to read as follows:
ARTICLE VIII. WATER WASTE
SEC. 22-137 WATER WASTE PROHIBITED – EMERGENCY PROVISIONS (A) The city council further declares during emergency drought conditions when the city council has adopted a declaration or resolution declaring a water shortage emergency that further emergency water conservation measures shall be mandatory on all persons using city water within city limits, and persons using city water outside the city limits but within the Oxnard Municipal Water’s service area, and are in addition to the conservation measures in Section 22-136.
(B) Therefore, the city council orders the emergency restrictions on water use as specified below:
(1) Stage 1 (10% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a stage 1 water supply condition:
(a) Water Days. Outdoor Irrigation is limited to three days per week using a landscape irrigation system or a watering device. The outdoor irrigation measures set forth in Section 22-136(B)(1) through (4) apply to this provision.
These outdoor irrigation restrictions do not apply to the following categories:
(i) The hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with use of a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a positive self closing shut-off nozzle;
(ii) The use of drip irrigation systems to apply water at a weekly volume consistent with the three days per week watering restriction; (iii) Irrigation of sport activity fields as necessary to maintain playing surface quality.
(2) Stage 2 (10-20% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 2 water supply condition:
328
Urgency Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
(a) Water Days. Outdoor Irrigation is limited to two days per week using a landscape irrigation system or a watering device for no more than 10 minutes per day per station. The outdoor irrigation measures set forth in Section 22- 136(B)(1),(2) and (4) apply to this provision. These outdoor irrigation restrictions do not apply to the following categories:
(i) The hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with use of a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a positive self closing shut-off nozzle;
(ii) The use of drip irrigation systems to apply water at a weekly volume consistent with the two days per week watering restriction; (iii) Irrigation of sport activity fields as necessary to maintain playing surface quality.
(b) Watering of non-functional turf, which is turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events at commercial, industrial and institutional properties, including Home Owners Associations (“HOAs”) is prohibited.
(c) Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired promptly, and in no event more than 48 hours after discovery or receipt of notice from the City. (d) Limits on Filling Ornamental Ponds or Fountains. Filling or refilling ornamental lakes or fountains is prohibited, except to the extent needed to sustain aquatic life, provided that aquatic life has been actively managed within the ornamental pond or fountain prior to declaration of a stage 2 water supply condition.
(3) Stage 3 (20-30% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 3 water supply condition:
(a) Water Days. Outdoor Irrigation is limited to one day per week, using a landscape irrigation system or a watering device for no more than 10 minutes per station. The outdoor irrigation measures set forth in Section 22-136(B)(1), (2) and (4) apply to this provision. These restrictions do not apply to the following categories:
(i) The hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with use of a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a positive self closing shut-off nozzle;
(ii) The use of drip irrigation systems to apply water at a weekly volume consistent with the one day per week watering restriction; (iii) Irrigation of sport activity fields as necessary to maintain playing surface quality.
(b) Watering of non-functional turf, which is turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events, at commercial, industrial and institutional properties, including Home Owners Associations (“HOAs”) is prohibited.
329
Urgency Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
(c) Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired promptly, and in no event more than 24 hours after discovery or receipt of notice from the City. (d) Limits on Filling Ornamental Ponds or Fountains. Filling or refilling ornamental lakes or fountains is prohibited, except to the extent needed to sustain aquatic life, provided that aquatic life has been actively managed within the ornamental pond or fountain prior to declaration of a stage 3 water supply condition.
(4) Stage 4 (30-40% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 4 water supply condition:
(a) Water Days. Outdoor Irrigation is prohibited. This restriction does not apply to the following category:
(i) The hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with use of a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a positive self closing shut-off nozzle.
(ii) The use of drip irrigation systems to apply water as needed for trees, food plants or other perennials.
(b)Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired promptly, and in no event more than 24 hours after discovery or receipt of notice from the City. (c)Limits on Filling Ornamental Ponds or Fountains. Filling or refilling ornamental lakes or fountains is prohibited, except to the extent needed to sustain aquatic life, provided that aquatic life has been actively managed within the ornamental pond or fountain prior to declaration of a stage 4 water supply condition.
(5) Stage 5 (40-50% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 5 water supply condition:
(a) Water. Watering with potable water is prohibited. This restriction does not apply to the following categories:
(i) Maintenance of vegetation, including trees and food plants; (ii) Maintenance of existing landscape necessary for fire protection; (iii) Maintenance of existing landscape for erosion control; (iv) Maintenance of plant materials identified to be rare or essential to the well-being of protected species;
(b) Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired promptly, and in no event more than 24 hours after discovery or receipt of notice from the City. (6) Stage 6 (Greater than 50% reduction in available supplies) the following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 6 water supply condition:
(a) Water. Outdoor Irrigation with potable water is prohibited. 330
Urgency Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
(b) Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired immediately upon discovery or receipt of notice from the City.
SEC. 22-138. FAILURE TO COMPLY
Any violation of the provisions of this article shall be prosecuted as an administrative citation, pursuant to Chapter 7, Article III or as a criminal citation pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 1, Section 1-10 as determined by the City Attorney. The following administrative remedies shall be imposed against any person for violation(s) of this Article:
(A) For the first violation, a written warning shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring.
(B) For the second violation during a 12-month period, a written notice to correct the violation shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring. (C) For the third violation during a 12-month period, an administrative citation and fine in the amount of $100.00 shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring. (D) For the fourth violation during a 12-month period an administrative citation and fine in the amount of $300.00 shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring. (E) For the fifth violation during a 12-month period an administrative citation and fine in the amount of $700.00 shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring. (F) (1) For a Sixth violation during a 12-month period, and upon a written notice of violation, the city shall be able to install, at the expense of the responsible person or entity, a flow-restricting device of one gallon per minute capacity on the location receiving water service through up to 1½-inch size distribution systems and comparatively sized restricting devices on locations receiving water service through larger distribution systems. These devices shall be installed for a period of not less than 48 hours on the service of the responsible person or entity at the location at which the violation occurred or is occurring. (2) The charge for installation of such a flow-restricting device shall be based upon the size of the responsible person's or entity’s meter and the actual cost of installation. (3) The flow-restricting device shall remain installed until removed as authorized by the city manager. The charge for removal of the flow-restricting device and restoration of normal service shall be based on the city's actual cost.
(4) For any violations after the sixth violation during a 12-month period, the city may discontinue water service to the violator at the location at which the violation(s) occurred, or impose such other penalty as deemed appropriate by the city manager, until such time that the city manager determines that further violations are not likely to occur.
SEC. 22-139. NOTICE TO CUSTOMER.
331
Urgency Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
(A) The city shall provide notice of each violation of this article to the responsible person or entity at the location where the violation occurred, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 7, Article III, Sections 7-54 and 7-55 and as follows:
(1) For a first violation and subsequent violations, the city shall give written notice of the fact of such violation to the responsible person by personal service, by delivery through regular United States mail addressed to the customer's residence, or any other means reasonably designed to notify the responsible person of the violation. (2) If the installation of a flow restrictor is scheduled, or the discontinuance of water service to the responsible person for any period of time may occur, advance notice shall be given in the following manner:
(a) Written notice to the responsible person by personal service; (b) If the responsible person is absent from or unavailable at either the customer's residence or place of business, by leaving a copy of the notice with an adult at either location, and by delivery of the notice through regular United States mail addressed to the customer at either the responsible person's place of business or residence; or (c) If such residence or place of business cannot be ascertained, or an adult cannot be found at the location of the violation, then by affixing a copy of the notice in a conspicuous place at the location where the violation has occurred, and by delivery of a copy of the notice through regular United States mail addressed to the responsible person at the responsible person's water utility billing address and to the subject location. (B) All notices shall contain, in addition to the facts of the violation, a statement of the possible remedies for each violation, a statement informing the responsible person of his/her right to an administrative hearing on the violation, the amount of the fine, the date and time the water flow shall be restricted, or the water service discontinued.
SEC. 22-140. RIGHT TO HEARING.
(A) Any responsible person against whom a fine has been issued or on whose water service is scheduled for flow restriction, or whose water service may be discontinued, shall have a right to a hearing to be conducted by a person selected by the city manager. The responsible person shall file the written request for a hearing or complete an administrative hearing request form with the city manager's designee within 30 days of the date of notification of the violation and intended remedy. All hearings shall be conducted in conformity with the provisions of this Section, Chapter 7, Article III, Sections 7-58 through 7-63, and Chapter 1 Article III.
(B) A responsible person against whom a fine has been issued may request a waiver of fine deposit pursuant to Chapter 7, Article III, section 7-59. (C) (1) The hearing shall be conducted promptly following the request for hearing. The responsible person may present any relevant evidence at the hearing which tends to show that the alleged violation has not occurred.
(2) The formal rules of evidence shall not apply and all relevant evidence customarily relied upon by reasonable persons in the conduct of serious business affairs shall be admissible, unless a sound objection warrants its exclusion. 332
Urgency Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
(3) The decision of the city manager's designee shall be final and exhaust the administrative process.
(D) The responsible person may seek judicial review of the hearing officer's decision by filing an appeal with the Ventura County Superior Court Clerk within 20 calendar days after the responsible person receives a copy of the notice of decision in accordance with Cal. Gov't Code, Section 53069.4. Any appeal filed with the superior court shall contain a proof of service showing that a copy of the appeal was served upon the city. The responsible person must pay the appropriate filing fees.
SEC. 22-141. RESTORATION OF DISCONTINUED WATER SERVICE.
When water service is discontinued, the service shall be restored upon the following conditions:
(A) Proof submitted by the violator of correction of the condition or activity satisfactory to the city manager or his designee; and
(B) Payment of the estimated restoration charge, including the cost of any inspection fees or required staff time, and all other fees and charges still outstanding, including, but not limited to, fines and/or installation and removal charges for flow restrictors.
SEC. 22-142. LIMITATIONS ON CURTAILMENT.
Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to allow the city to curtail the supply of water to any customer when, in the discretion of the city manager or Ventura County Environmental Health Department, such water is required by that customer to maintain a minimum level of public health and safety.
SEC. 22-143. ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL.
The employees of the police, fire, development services and public works departments and other designated persons shall be responsible for enforcement of the various sections of this article under their respective authority or as is specifically assigned to them by the city manager.
Part 4. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City Council exercises its independent judgment and finds that this Urgency Ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, sections: 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment); 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378); and 15061(b)(3), because the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that will have a significant effect on the environment. There is no possibility that the passage of this ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA.
Part 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent 333
Urgency Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Urgency Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The Council of the City of Oxnard hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Urgency Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Urgency Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.
Part 6. Pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code Section 36933(c)(1), the City Attorney was designated to prepare, and the City Clerk published, a summary of this ordinance, and a certified copy of the Urgency Ordinance was posted in the Office of the City Clerk a minimum of five days before the City Council’s adoption of the Ordinance.
Part 7. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the summary thereof to be published within fifteen (15) days of the adoption and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933. Urgency Ordinance No. ________was first read on November 1, 2022, and adopted on November 1, 2022, and is effective immediately.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________________
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________________
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________________
Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney
334
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY
WHEREAS climate change continues to intensify the impacts of droughts on our communities, environment, and economy, and California is in a second consecutive year of dry conditions, resulting in drought in all parts of the State and extreme or exceptional drought in most of the State; and
WHEREAS the meteorological summer in California and the rest of the western United States was the hottest on record; and WHEREAS on April 12, 2021, May l 0, 2021, and July 8, 2021, I proclaimed states of emergency to exist in the counties of Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Marin, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Benito, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, and Yuba, due to severe drought conditions; and WHEREAS since my July 8, 2021 Proclamation, sustained and extreme high temperatures have increased water loss from reservoirs and streams, increased demands by communities and agriculture, and further depleted California's water supplies; and
WHEREAS the counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, and Ventura are now experiencing severe drought conditions; and
WHEREAS long-term weather forecasts for the winter rainy season, dire storage conditions of California's largest reservoirs, low moisture content in native vegetation, and parched soils, magnify the likelihood that drought impacts will continue in 2022 and beyond; and WHEREAS the increasing frequency of multiyear droughts presents a significant risk to California's ability to ensure adequate water supplies for communities, agriculture, and fish and wildlife; and
WHEREAS the most impactful action Californians can take to extend available supplies is to re-double their efforts to voluntarily reduce their water use by 15 percent from their 2020 levels by implementing the commonsense measures identified in operative paragraph l of my July 8, 2021 Executive Order N-10-21; and
WHEREAS it is necessary to expeditiously mitigate the effects of the drought conditions to ensure the protection of health, safety, and the environment; and
WHEREAS under Government Code Section 8558(b), I find that the conditions caused by the drought, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single local government and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to appropriately respond; and 335
WHEREAS under Government Code Section 8625( c), I find that local authority is inadequate to cope with the drought conditions; and WHEREAS to protect public health and safety, it is critical the State take certain immediate actions without undue delay to prepare for and mitigate the effects of the drought conditions, and under Government Code Section 8571, I find that strict compliance with various statutes and regulations specified in this Proclamation would prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the drought conditions.
NOW THEREFORE, I, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, in accordance with the authority vested in me by the State Constitution and statutes, including the California Emergency Services Act, and in particular, Section 8625, HEREBY PROCLAIM A STATE OF EMERGENCY to exist in the State due to drought in the remaining counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, and Ventura, such that the drought state of emergency is now in effect statewide.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. All agencies of the state government are to utilize and employ state personnel, equipment, and facilities for the performance of any and all activities consistent with the direction of the Governor's Office of Emergency Services and the State Emergency Plan. Also, to protect their safety, all residents are to obey the direction of emergency officials with regard to this emergency in order to protect their safety.
2. The orders and provisions contained in my April 21, 2021, May 10, 2021, and July 8, 2021 Proclamations remain in full force and effect, except as modified herein. State agencies shall continue to implement all directions from those Proclamations and accelerate implementation where feasible.
3. Operative paragraphs 3, 5, 6, and 10 of my July 8, 2021 Proclamation are withdrawn and replaced with paragraphs 4 through 8 below.
4. Consistent with the policies stated in Water Code Section 1Ol 1.5(a), local agencies are encouraged to take actions to coordinate use of their available supplies and to substitute an alternate supply of groundwater from existing groundwater wells for the unused portion of surface water that the local agency is otherwise entitled to use.
For actions taken pursuant to this paragraph, the provisions of Chapter 3 ( commencing with Section 85225) of Part 3 of Division 35 of the Water Code and regulations adopted pursuant thereto are suspended for any (a) actions taken by state agencies pursuant to this paragraph, (b) actions taken by a local agency where the state agency with primary responsibility for implementing the directive concurs that local action is required, and (c) permits or approvals necessary to carry out actions under (a) or (b). The entities implementing this paragraph shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals that rely on the suspension of the foregoing Water Code provisions.
336
5. To support voluntary approaches where hydrology and other conditions allow, the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) shall expeditiously consider water transfer requests. For purposes of carrying out this paragraph, the following requirements of the Water Code are suspended:
a. Section l 726(d) requirements for written notice and newspaper publication, provided that the Water Board shall post notice on its website and provide notice through
electronic subscription services where interested persons can request information about temporary changes; and
b. Section l 726(f) requirement of a 30-day comment period, provided that the Water Board shall afford a 15-day
comment period.
6. As necessary to assist local governments and for the protection of public health and the environment, state agencies shall enter into contracts to arrange for the procurement of materials, goods, and services necessary to quickly assist with the response to and recovery from the impacts of the drought. Applicable provisions of the Government Code and the Public Contract Code, including but not limited to travel, advertising, and competitive bidding requirements, are suspended to the extent necessary to address the effects of the drought. Approval of the Department of Finance is required prior to the execution of any contract entered into pursuant to this provision.
7. To proactively prevent situations where a community runs out of drinking water, the Water Board, the Department of Water Resources, the Office of Emergency Services, and the Office of Planning and Research shall assist local agencies with identifying acute drinking water shortages in domestic water supplies, and shall work with local agencies in implementing solutions to those water shortages.
8. To preserve the State's surface and groundwater supplies and better prepare for the potential for continued dry conditions next year, local water suppliers are directed to execute their urban Water Shortage Contingency Plans and agricultural Drought Plans at a level appropriate to local conditions that takes into account the possibility of a third consecutive dry year. Suppliers shall ensure that Urban and Agricultural Water Management Plans are up to date and in place.
9. The Water Board may adopt emergency regulations, as it deems necessary, to supplement voluntary conservation by prohibiting certain wasteful water practices. Wasteful water uses include:
a. The use of potable water for washing sidewalks, driveways, buildings, structures, patios, parking lots, or _other hardsurfaced areas, except in cases where health and safety are at risk.
b. The use of potable water that results in flooding or runoff in gutters or streets.
337
c. The use of potable water, except with the use of a positive shut-off nozzle, for the individual private washing of motor vehicles.
d. The use of water to irrigate turf and ornamental landscapes during and within 48 hours after measurable rainfall of at least one-fourth of one inch of rain.
e. The use of potable water for irrigation of ornamental turf on public street medians.
f. The use of potable water for street cleaning or construction purposes, unless no other source of water or other method can be used or if necessary, to protect the health and safety of the public.
g. The use of potable water for decorative fountains or the filling or topping-off of decorative lakes or ponds, with exceptions for those decorative fountains, lakes, or ponds which utilize recycled water.
10.The California Department of Food and Agriculture, in collaboration with other relevant state agencies, shall evaluate water efficiency measures implemented in California agriculture over the past · several years and develop a report with recommendations on how to further increase efficiencies.
11. The Office of Emergency Services shall provide assistance under the authority of the California Disaster Assistance Act, Government Code section 8680 et seq., and California Code of Regulations, title 19, section 2900 et seq., as appropriate to provide for, or in support of, the temporary emergency supply, delivery, or both of drinking water or water for sanitation purposes.
12. For purposes of carrying out or approving any actions contemplated by the directives in operative paragraphs 5, 6, and 9, the environmental review by state agencies required by the California Environmental Quality Act in Public Resources Code, Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought.
For purposes of carrying out the directive in operative paragraph 4 and 7, for any (a) actions taken by the listed state agencies pursuant to that directive, (b) actions taken by a local agency where the Office of Planning and Research concurs that local action is required, and (c) permits necessary to carry out actions under (a) or (b), Public Resources Code, Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought. The entities implementing these directives shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals for which these provisions are suspended.
This Proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any rights or benefits, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against the State of California, its agencies, departments, entities, officers, employees, or any other person.
338
I FURTHER DIRECT that as soon as hereafter possible, this Proclamation be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State and that widespread publicity and notice be given of this Proclamation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have
hereunto set my hand and caused
the Great Seal of the State of
Ca · · ixed this 19th day
er
overnor of California
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY N. WEBER, PH..D.
Secretary of State
339
State of California DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES California Natural Resources Agency
CALIFORNIA STATE WATER PROJECT
NOTICE TO STATE WATER PROJECT CONTRACTORS
DWR 9625 (Rev. 3/12) Page 1 of 1
Date: March 18, 2022
Number: 22-03
Subject: 2022 State Water Project Table A Allocation Decrease from 15 to 5 Percent .
From: Original signed by
Ted Craddock
Deputy Director, State Water Project
Department of Water Resources
Based on the driest January and February in more than 100 years and other aspects of current water supply conditions, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) is decreasing the State Water Project (SWP) Table A Allocation from 15 percent to 5 percent of most SWP long-term contractors’ 2022 requested Table A amounts. Attached is the revised 2022 SWP allocation table.
In addition, DWR will continue to allocate water to meet the human health and safety (HH&S) needs as defined in NTC 21-07 issued on December 1, 2021. Please note that this revised Table A Allocation will continue to reduce, on a 1:1 basis, any HH&S need volumes that were previously identified in the SWP contractors’ submittals to DWR.
This Table A Allocation decrease is made consistent with the long-term water supply contracts, legal requirements, and public policy. In determining available SWP supplies, DWR has considered several factors including SWP contractors’ 2022 demand, existing storage in SWP conservation reservoirs, estimates of future runoff under very dry conditions, SWP operational and regulatory constraints such as, federal Endangered Species Act, California Endangered Species Act requirements, and water rights obligations under the State Water Resources Control Board’s authority. DWR may revise this and any subsequent allocations if warranted by the year’s developing hydrologic conditions and available SWP water supplies.
To develop the 5 percent water delivery schedule, DWR will utilize the SWP Contractors’ 5 percent schedules that were submitted in October 2021 (as part of initial requests), including any subsequent updates that may have been provided to DWR. If a Contractor foresees significant changes to previously submitted schedules (including HH&S needs), they are requested to communicate such changes to DWR at the earliest possible time.
DWR will provide approved monthly water delivery schedules to the SWP Contractors.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact John Leahigh, Water Operations Executive Manager, at (916) 902-9876.
Attachment
340
Attachment
2022 STATE WATER PROJECT ALLOCATION
SWP CONTRACTORS TABLE A
(Acre-Feet)
(1)
INITIAL REQUEST
(Acre-Feet)
(2)
APPROVED
ALLOCATION
(Acre-Feet)
(3)
PERCENT INITIAL
REQUEST
APPROVED
(4) = (3)/(2)
FEATHER RIVER
County of Butte 27,500 27,500 3,000 11%
Plumas County FC&WCD 2,700 2,700 135 5%
City of Yuba City 9,600 9,600 1,440 15%
Subtotal 39,800 39,800 4,575
NORTH BAY
Napa County FC&WCD 29,025 29,025 4,354 15%
Solano County WA 47,756 47,756 7,164 15%
Subtotal 76,781 76,781 11,518
SOUTH BAY
Alameda County FC&WCD, Zone 7 80,619 80,619 4,031 5%
Alameda County WD 42,000 42,000 2,100 5%
Santa Clara Valley WD 100,000 100,000 5,000 5%
Subtotal 222,619 222,619 11,131
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY
Oak Flat WD 5,700 5,700 285 5%
County of Kings 9,305 9,305 466 5%
Dudley Ridge WD 41,350 41,350 2,068 5%
Empire West Side ID 3,000 3,000 150 5%
Kern County WA 982,730 982,730 49,137 5%
Tulare Lake Basin WSD 87,471 87,471 4,374 5%
Subtotal 1,129,556 1,129,556 56,480
CENTRAL COASTAL
San Luis Obispo County FC&WCD 25,000 25,000 1,250 5%
Santa Barbara County FC&WCD 45,486 45,486 2,275 5%
Subtotal 70,486 70,486 3,525
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Antelope Valley-East Kern WA 144,844 144,844 7,243 5%
Santa Clarita Valley WA 95,200 95,200 4,760 5%
Coachella Valley WD 138,350 138,350 6,918 5%
Crestline-Lake Arrowhead WA 5,800 5,800 290 5%
Desert WA 55,750 55,750 2,788 5%
Littlerock Creek ID 2,300 2,300 115 5%
Metropolitan WDSC 1,911,500 1,911,500 95,575 5%
Mojave WA 89,800 89,800 4,490 5%
Palmdale WD 21,300 21,300 1,065 5%
San Bernardino Valley MWD 102,600 102,600 5,130 5%
San Gabriel Valley MWD 28,800 28,800 1,440 5%
San Gorgonio Pass WA 17,300 17,300 865 5%
Ventura County WPD 20,000 20,000 1,000 5%
Subtotal 2,633,544 2,633,544 131,679
TOTAL 4,172,786 4,172,786 218,908 5%
341
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXECUTIVE ORDER N-7-22
WHEREAS on April 12, 202 l, May l 0, 2021, July 8, 202 l, and October 19, 2021, I proclaimed states of emergency that continue today and exist across all the counties of California, due to extreme and expanding drought conditions; and
WHEREAS climate change continues to intensify the impacts of droughts on our communities, environment, and economy, and California is in a third consecutive year of dry conditions, resulting in continuing drought in all parts of the State; and
WHEREAS the 21st century to date has been characterized by record warmth and predominantly dry conditions, and the 2021 meteorological summer in California and the rest of the western United States was the hottest on record; and
WHEREAS since my October 19, 2021 Proclamation, early rains in October and December 2021 gave way to the driest January and February in recorded history for the watersheds that provide much of California's water supply; and WHEREAS the ongoing drought will have significant, immediate impacts on communities with vulnerable water supplies, farms that rely on irrigation to grow food and fiber, and fish and wildlife that rely on stream flows and cool water; and
WHEREAS the two largest reservoirs of the Central Valley Project, which supplies water to farms and communities in the Central Valley and the Santa Clara Valley and provides critical cold-water habitat for salmon and other anadromous fish, have water storage levels that are approximately l .1 million acre-feet below last year's low levels on this date; and WHEREAS the record-breaking dry period in January and February and the absence of significant rains in March have required the Department of Water Resources to reduce anticipated deliveries from the State Water Project to 5 percent of requested supplies; and
WHEREAS delivery of water by bottle or truck is necessary to protect human safety and public health in those places where water supplies are disrupted; and
WHEREAS groundwater use accounts for 41 percent of the State's total water supply on an average annual basis but as much as 58 percent in a critically dry year, and approximately 85 percent of public water systems rely on groundwater as their primary supply; and
WHEREAS coordination between local entities that approve permits for new groundwater wells and local groundwater sustainability agencies is important to achieving sustainable levels of groundwater in critically overdrafted basins; and
342
WHEREAS the duration of the drought, especially following a multiyear drought that abated only five years ago, underscores the need for California to redouble near-, medium-, and long-term efforts to adapt its water management and delivery systems to a changing climate, shifting precipitation patterns, and water scarcity; and
WHEREAS the most consequential, immediate action Californians can take to extend available supplies is to voluntarily reduce their water use by 15 percent from their 2020 levels by implementing the commonsense measures identified in operative paragraph 1 of Executive Order N-10-21 (July 8, 2021 ); and
WHEREAS to protect public health and safety, it is critical the State take certain immediate actions without undue delay to prepare for and mitigate the effects of the drought conditions, and under Government Code section 8571, I find that strict compliance with various statutes and regulations specified in this Proclamation would prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the drought conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, in accordance with the authority vested in me by the State Constitution and statutes, including the California Emergency Services Act, and in particular, Government Code sections 8567, 8571, and 8627, do hereby issue the following Order to become effective immediately:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The orders and provisions contained in my April 21, 2021, May 10, 2021, July 8, 2021, and October 19, 2021 Proclamations remain in fu ll force and effect, except as modified by those Proclamations and herein.
State agencies shall continue to implement all directions from those Proclamations and accelerate implementation where feasible.
2. To help the State achieve its conservation goals and ensure sufficient water for essential indoor and outdoor use, I call on all Californians to strive to limit summertime water use and to use water more efficiently indoors and out. The statewide Save Our Water conservation campaign at SaveOurWater.com provides simple ways for Californians to reduce water use in their everyday lives. Furthermore, I encourage Californians to understand and track the amount of water they use and measure their progress toward their conservation goals.
3. By May 25, .2022, the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) shall consider adopting emergency regulations that include all of the following:
a. A requirement that each urban water supplier, as defined in section 10617 of the Water Code, shall submit to the Department of Water Resources a preliminary annual water supply and demand assessment consistent with section 10632.1 of the Water Code no later than June 1, 2022, and submit a final annual water 343
supply and demand assessment to the Department of Water Resources no later than the deadline set by section 10632.1 of the Water Code;
b. A requirement that each urban water supplier that has submitted a water shortage contingency plan to the
Department of Water Resources implement, at a minimum, the shortage response actions adopted under section 10632 of the Water Code for a shortage level of up to twenty percent (Level 2), by a date to be set by the Water Board; and
c. A requirement that each urban water supplier that has not submitted a water shortage contingency plan to the
Department of Water Resources implement, at a minimum,
shortage response actions established by the Water Board, which shall take into consideration model actions that the Department of Water Resources shall develop for urban water supplier water shortage contingency planning for Level 2, by a date to be set by the Water Board.
To further conserve water and improve drought resiliency if the drought lasts beyond this year, I encourage urban water suppliers to conserve more than required by the emergency regulations described in this paragraph and to voluntarily activate more stringent local requirements based on a shortage level of up to thirty percent (Level 3).
4. To promote water conservation, the Department of Water Resources shall consult with leaders in the commercial, industrial, and institutional sectors to develop strategies for improving water conservation, including direct technical assistance, financial assistance, and other approaches. By May 25, 2022, the Water Board shall consider adopting emergency regulations defining "non-functional turf" (that is, a definition of turf that is ornamental and not otherwise used for human recreation purposes such as school fields, sports fields, and parks) and banning irrigation of non-functional turf in the commercial, industrial, and institutional sectors except as it may be required to ensure the health of trees and other perennial non-turf plantings.
5. In order to maximize the efficient use of water and to preserve water supplies critical to human health and safety and the environment, Public Resources Code, Division 13 (commencing with section 21000) and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division are hereby suspended, with respect to the directives in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Order and any other projects and activities for the purpose of water conservation to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought, and any permits necessary to carry out such projects or activities. Entities that desire to conduct activities under this suspension, other than the directives in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Order, shall first request that the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency make a determination that the proposed activities are eligible to be conducted under this suspension. The Secretary shall use sound discretion in applying this Executive Order to ensure that the suspension serves the purpose of accelerating conservation projects that are necessary to address impacts of the drought, while at the same time 344
protecting public health and the environment. The entities implementing these directives or conducting activities under this suspension shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals for which these provisions are suspended.
6. To support voluntary approaches to improve fish habitat that would require change petitions under Water Code section 1707 and either Water Code sections 1425 through 1432 or Water Code sections 1725 through 1732, and where the primary purpose is to improve conditions for fish, the Water Board shall expeditiously consider petitions that add a fish and wildlife beneficial use or point of diversion and place of storage to improve conditions for anadromous fish. California Code of Regulations, title 23, section 1064, subdivisions ( a) ( 1) (A) (i)-(ii) are suspended with respect to any petition that is subject to this paragraph.
7. To facilitate the hauling of water for domestic use by local communities and domestic water users threatened with the loss of water supply or degraded water quality resulting from drought, any ordinance, regulation, prohibition, policy, or requirement of any kind adopted by a public agency that prohibits the hauling of water out of the water's basin of origin or a public agency's jurisdiction is hereby suspended. The suspension authorized pursuant to this paragraph shall be limited to the hauling of water by truck or bottle to be used for human consumption, cooking, or sanitation in communities or residences threatened with the loss of affordable safe drinking water.
Nothing in this paragraph limits any public health or safety requirement to ensure the safety of hauled water.
8. The Water Board shall expand inspections to determine whether illegal diversions or wasteful or unreasonable use of water are occurring and bring enforcement actions against illegal diverters and those engaging in the wasteful and unreasonable use of water. When access is not granted by a property owner, the Water Board may obtain an inspection warrant pursuant to the procedures set forth in Title 13 (commencing with section 1822.50) of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure for the purposes of conducting an inspection pursuant to this directive.
9. To protect health, safety, and the environment during this drought emergency, a county, city, or other public agency shall not:
a. Approve a permit for a new groundwater well or for alteration of an existing well in a basin subject to the Sustainable
Groundwater Management Act and classified as medium- or high-priority without first obtaining written verification from a Groundwater Sustainability Agency managing the basin or area of the basin where the well is proposed to be located that groundwater extraction by the proposed well would not be inconsistent with any sustainable groundwater management program established in any applicable Groundwater
Sustainability Plan adopted by that Groundwater Sustainability 345
Agency and would not decrease the likelihood of achieving a sustainability goal for the basin covered by such a plan; or b. Issue a permit for a new groundwater well or for alteration of an existing well without first determining that extraction of groundwater from the proposed well is (1) not likely to interfere with the production and functioning of existing nearby wells, and (2) not likely to cause subsidence that would adversely impact or damage nearby infrastructure.
This paragraph shall not apply to permits for wells that will provide less than two acre-feet per year of groundwater for individual domestic users, or that will exclusively provide groundwater to public water supply systems as defined in section 116275 of the Health and Safety Code.
10. To address household or small community drinking water shortages dependent upon groundwater wells that have failed due to drought conditions, the Department of Water Resources shall work with other state agencies to investigate expedited regulatory pathways to modify, repair, or reconstruct failed household or small community or public supply wells, while recognizing the need to ensure the sustainability of such wells as provided for in paragraph 9.
11. State agencies shall collaborate with tribes and federal, regional, and local agencies on actions related to promoting groundwater recharge and increasing storage.
12. To help advance groundwater recharge projects, and to demonstrate the feasibility of projects that can use available high water flows to recharge local groundwater while minimizing flood risks, the Water Board and Regional Water Quality Control Boards shall prioritize water right permits, water quality certifications, waste discharge requirements, and conditional waivers of waste discharge requirements to accelerate approvals for projects that enhance the ability of a local or state agency to capture high precipitation events for local storage or recharge, consistent with water right priorities and protections for fish and wildlife. For the purposes of carrying out this paragraph, Division 13 (commencing with section 21000) of the Public Resources Code and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division, and Chapter 3 ( commencing with section 85225) of Part 3 of Division 35 of the Water Code and regulations adopted pursuant thereto are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought. This suspension applies to (a) any actions taken by state agencies, (b) any actions taken by local agencies where the state agency with primary responsibility for the implementation of the directives concurs that local action is required, and (c) permits necessary to carry out actions under (a) or (b). The entities implementing these directives shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals for which these provisions are suspended.
13. With respect to recharge projects under either Flood-Managed Aquifer Recharge or the Department of Water Resources Sustainable 346
Groundwater Management Grant Program occurring on open and working lands to replenish and store water in groundwater basins that will help mitigate groundwater conditions impacted by drought, for any (a) actions taken by state agencies, (b) actions taken by a local agency where the Department of Water Resources concurs that local action is required, and (c) permits necessary to carry out actions under (a) or (b), Public Resources Code, Division 13 (commencing with section 21000) and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought. The entities implementing these directives shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals for which these provisions are suspended.
14. To increase resilience of.state water supplies during prolonged drought conditions, the Department of Water Resources shall prepare for the potential creation and implementation of a multi-year transfer program pilot project for the purpose of acquiring water from willing partners and storing and conveying water to areas of need.
15. By April 15, 2022, state agencies shall submit to the Department of Finance for my consideration proposals to mitigate the worsening effects of severe drought, including emergency assistance to communities and households and others facing water shortages as a result of the drought, facilitation of groundwater recharge and wastewater recycling, improvements in water use efficiency, protection of fish and wildlife, mitigation of drought-related economic or water-supply disruption, and other potential investments to support short- and long-term drought response.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as soon as hereafter possible, this Order be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State and that widespread publicity and notice be given of this Order.
This Order is not intended to, and does not, create any rights or benefits, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against the State of California, its agencies, departments, entities, officers, employees, or any other person.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set
my hand and caused the Great Seal of the
State of California to be affixed this 28th
day of March 2022.
I I
,:, .
l · I'
t (.1 I
l~~-~-- GAVIN NEWSOM
Governor of California
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY N. WEBER, PH.D.
Secretary of State
347
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION 9305
DECLARING A WATER SHORTAGE EMERGENCY CONDITION AND IMPLEMENTING AN
EMERGENCY WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM IN PORTIONS OF ITS SERVICE AREA WHEREAS, Severe Drought Conditions Are Constraining Available Water Supplies from Northern California.
Beginning in water year 2020 (October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020), the watersheds supplying the California State Water Project (SWP) received below-average precipitation. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) classified water years 2020 and 2021 as dry and critically dry, respectively. Persistent dry conditions will likely result in a critically dry designation for water year 2022.
The three-year sequence of water years 2020 - 2022 (October 1, 2019, through September 30, 2022) is projected to be the driest on record in California for statewide precipitation. Precipitation in Northern California during the three months from January through March 2022 was the driest on record for that region.
In addition to reduced precipitation since 2020, California’s climate is transitioning to a warmer setting in which historical relationships among temperature, precipitation, and runoff are changing. In 2021, the DWR’s snowmelt runoff forecast over-estimated the runoff that occurred by 68 percent. In 2022, DWR’s median runoff forecast for the Sacramento River dropped from 16.7 to 9.7 million acre-feet, a reduction of 42 percent.
WHEREAS, Governor Newsom Has Declared a State of Emergency to Exist in All California Counties Due to These Severe Drought Conditions.
On October 19, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency to exist in all California counties due to worsening drought conditions. This proclamation follows other increasingly expansive drought declarations and executive orders that have been issued since April 2021.
At that time, Governor Newsom called on Californians to re-double their efforts to reduce water use by 15 percent and for local and regional water agencies to implement their Water Shortage Contingency Plans (WSCPs) “at a level appropriate to local conditions that takes into account the possibility of a third consecutive dry year.”
WHEREAS, Governor Newsom Has Issued an Executive Order Calling on Urban Water Suppliers to Activate Their Water Shortage Contingency Plans.
As part of their Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs), local and regional water providers are required to prepare and adopt WSCPs. These plans identify voluntary and mandatory response actions that will be taken under various water shortage conditions. These actions may include mandatory conservation activities to reduce water use by 10 to 50 percent, depending on the severity of the shortage.
Due to worsening drought conditions, including a record-breaking dry period in January and February, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-7-22 on March 28, 2022, specifically requiring all urban water suppliers to implement, at a minimum, the response actions identified in their WSCPs for a shortage level of up to 20 percent (Level 2).
This executive order further encouraged urban water suppliers to conserve more than the minimum required and to voluntarily activate more stringent local requirements based on a shortage level of up to 30 percent (Level 3).
1 348
WHEREAS, Metropolitan’s State Water Project Supplies Have Been and Are Being Curtailed.
On March 18, 2022, DWR reduced the SWP Table A allocation for 2022 from 15 to only five percent of contract amounts. Table A allocations for 2020 and 2021 were 20 and five percent, respectively. The last three years marks the lowest three-year combined deliveries of allocated water in the history of the SWP.
Three consecutive years of low Table A allocations have strained water supplies for portions of Metropolitan’s service area that currently are served primarily through the SWP. Referred to as the “SWP Dependent Area,” this area has limited or no access to Colorado River Supplies.
As a result, there will be insufficient SWP supplies this year to meet the minimum human health and safety (HH&S) needs in the SWP Dependent Area. HH&S needs are defined as “the amount of water necessary for prevention of adverse impacts to human health and safety, for which there is no feasible alternative supply.” In general, HH&S needs are limited to domestic supply, sanitation, public health and fire protection purposes, and cannot exceed 55 gallons per person per day.
To supplement the low Table A allocation, DWR has agreed to provide additional SWP supplies to SWP contractors if necessary to fulfill their unmet HH&S needs. However, DWR is requiring any SWP contractor receiving such supplies to impose mandatory restrictions on water use within its service area consistent with these emergency circumstances. DWR also is requiring any SWP water accessed for HH&S purposes be returned to the state within five years or as wetter conditions return.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan’s SWP Supplies Are Essential to Meet the Total Demands of Its Member Agencies.
Over the past 20 years, the SWP has provided about 30 percent of the region’s total water needs and a portion of the supply delivered to each of Metropolitan’s 26 Member Agencies.
Diamond Valley Lake, Metropolitan’s largest surface water reservoir and source of dry-year and emergency water supplies, has only been replenished with SWP supplies since the discovery of Quagga mussels in Colorado River water in Jan. 2007.
Under a five percent Table A allocation, Metropolitan cannot meet normal demands in the SWP Dependent Area, serve SWP supplies to other Member Agencies, or replenish storage in Diamond Valley Lake.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan, Its Member Agencies, and Others in the Region Have Taken Extraordinary Steps to Reduce Demands and Bolster Supplies.
In conjunction with its Member Agencies, counties, cities, and wholesale and retail water suppliers, Metropolitan decreased potable water demands within the service area by 40 percent, roughly 80 gallons per person per day, since 1990.
Metropolitan has invested $1.5 billion in conservation, local water recycling, and local groundwater recovery since 1990, resulting in a cumulative savings of nearly 7.6 million acre-feet.
Metropolitan has invested more than $3 billion in increasing storage capacity with Diamond Valley Lake and conveyance capacity with the Inland Feeder to capture SWP supply when available for later use in dry years.
Local water suppliers and communities have also made multi-billion-dollar strategic and forward-looking investments in water conservation (within and outside the MWD service area), water recycling, stormwater capture and reuse, groundwater storage, seawater desalination and other strategies to improve drought resilience.
Water conserved throughout the service area, among other things, has helped preserve storage in Metropolitan’s diverse storage portfolio during these dry conditions.
Continued action by Southern California residents to conserve water and extend local groundwater and surface water supplies will provide greater resilience if the drought continues in future years. 2 349
Metropolitan established the Member Agency Administered Program (MAAP) to assist Member Agencies in implementing local conservation activities. A portion of the funded projects can be used when water savings are not readily quantifiable, such as drought messaging and local water-use related code enforcement programs.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan and Its Member Agencies Have Taken Specific Actions to Preserve SWP Supplies.
Metropolitan and its Member Agencies have invested billions of dollars to preserve and enhance the availability and utilization of local supplies and, in turn, to decrease the overall use of Metropolitan’s imported supplies.
Metropolitan has established water management programs to increase Member Agency flexibility to shift from or temporarily defer taking Metropolitan’s supply from the SWP.
In 2021 and 2022, Metropolitan made targeted investments in its delivery system to reduce Member Agency dependency on SWP supplies. These investments have significantly improved operational flexibility, allowing delivery of water from either of Metropolitan’s two imported supply sources to most of the service area.
Metropolitan’s Member Agencies have, where feasible, operated their systems to reduce dependency on Metropolitan’s supply delivered through service connections fed from the SWP system.
On August 17, 2021, Metropolitan’s Board adopted a resolution declaring a “Condition 2 – Water Supply Alert” to preserve Metropolitan’s supply for the region.
On November 9, 2021, Metropolitan’s Board adopted a resolution recognizing the statewide drought emergency, declaring specified emergency conditions to exist within portions of its service area, and calling on Member Agencies to take various actions to preserve Metropolitan’s supply from the SWP. Among other things, Member Agencies were urged to make all reasonably practicable changes in their operations and to implement mandatory conservation and efficiency measures to reduce the use of SWP supplies.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan Has Determined that It Must Take Additional Actions Immediately to Conserve the Remaining Available SWP Supplies.
In December 2014, Metropolitan’s Board adopted a revised Water Supply Allocation Plan (WSAP) pursuant to which it may determine that a regional shortage exists, establish a regional shortage level, and impose an Allocation Surcharge on Member Agencies for water use above a predetermined allotment. The WSAP was designed and intended only for use during periods of regionwide water shortages and requires a more extended period to implement. As such, the current WSAP cannot effectively or efficiently address the water shortages anticipated to occur this year in the SWP Dependent Area.
Likewise, while actions being taken pursuant to the November 9, 2021, Board resolution are helpful, they are not sufficient to address in a timely manner the urgent circumstances present in the SWP Dependent Area.
That resolution specifically noted that if drought conditions persisted or worsened, Metropolitan’s Board would consider declaring a Water Shortage Emergency Condition and imposing appropriate regulations, restrictions and penalties to conserve Metropolitan’s water supplies.
Unfortunately, drought conditions have persisted, and the water supply outlook has worsened, particularly with respect to SWP supplies. Accordingly, Metropolitan believes it is necessary, desirable, and in the best interests of Metropolitan and its Member Agencies to declare that a Water Shortage Emergency Condition exists in the SWP Dependent Area, to adopt the framework for an Emergency Water Conservation Program encompassing the SWP Dependent Area, and to take certain other actions as set forth below and described in Board Letter 7-1 dated April 26, 2022, so as to reduce water use and preserve remaining SWP supplies.
Adopting an Emergency Water Conservation Program is consistent with actions taken by our Member Agencies and other retail agencies and will assist Metropolitan and its Member Agencies in public outreach efforts to communicate the severity of the current drought and the need for conservation and collective action. 3 350
Metropolitan further believes that it is necessary, desirable, and in the best interest of Metropolitan to work closely with Member Agencies to identify near-term actions to address this drought emergency and to grant the General Manager certain additional powers and authorities to assist in carrying out such activities promptly.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan Is Authorized and Required to Take These Additional Actions.
Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution requires all water resources in the state to be put to beneficial use and prohibits the waste or unreasonable use of such resources. What constitutes reasonable use is dependent on exigent circumstances, and may change during periods of drought.
Water Code Section 350 et seq. requires the distributor of a public water supply to declare that a water shortage emergency condition exists “whenever it finds and determines that the ordinary demands and requirements of water consumers cannot be satisfied without depleting the water supply needed for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection.” Upon making such a declaration, the water supplier is authorized to adopt such regulations and restrictions as will, in its sound discretion, “conserve the water supply for the greatest public benefit with particular regard to domestic use, sanitation, and fire protection.” Water Code Section 375 et seq. authorizes retail and wholesale water providers to adopt water and enforce conservation programs, which may include specific water-use limitations. Water providers may impose civil and criminal penalties for violating the requirements of such programs and/or may enforce water-use limitations by imposing “a volumetric penalty in an amount established by the public entity.” Water Code Section 10620 et seq. requires every urban water supplier to prepare and adopt an UWMP, which must include a WSCP to be implemented during times of shortage. Governor Newsom has directed all urban water suppliers to implement, at a minimum, the response actions identified in their WSCPs for a shortage level of up to 20 percent (Level 2).
DWR is requiring any SWP contractor receiving HH&S supplies to impose mandatory restrictions on water use within its service area consistent with these emergency circumstances.
The Metropolitan District Act and Metropolitan’s Administrative Code authorize and support taking specific actions to address the current drought emergency. In particular, Administrative Code Section 4512 provides that deliveries of water “shall be subject to operational, supply or demand conditions, as determined by the General Manager.”
WHEREAS, Metropolitan Held a Noticed Public Hearing to Receive Input on These Additional Actions.
On April 26, 2022, a public hearing was held to receive input, comments, and/or protests on the proposed declaration of a Water Shortage Emergency Condition and adoption of the framework of an Emergency Water Conservation Program for the SWP Dependent Area, as well as the other actions set forth below and described in Board Letter 7-1 dated April 26, 2022. A copy of Board Letter 7-1 was posted on Metropolitan’s website (https://mwdh2o.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx) and was available for review prior to the hearing.
Notice of this hearing was published on April 14, 2022, in six different newspapers of general circulation encompassing all six counties within Metropolitan’s service area: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles County), Orange County Register (Orange County), Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (San Bernardino County), Ventura County Star (Ventura County), Press Enterprise (Riverside County), and San Diego Union Tribune (San Diego County).
At this public hearing, Metropolitan’s Board received information, comments, testimony, and other evidence provided by Board members, Member Agency representatives, staff, and the public pertaining to these matters, and all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California hereby declares a Water Shortage Emergency Condition to exist in the SWP Dependent Area. Per this declaration, the Board calls on all Member Agencies to:
4 351
(1) Make all possible changes in their operations to reduce their use of Metropolitan’s SWP supplies. (2) Immediately mandate and implement such conservation requirements, water-use efficiency measures, and drought-related limitations consistent with their WSCPs and substantively conforming to the Emergency Water Conservation Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to finalize and implement an Emergency Water Conservation Program in the SWP Dependent Area, subject to the following conditions:
(1) The Emergency Water Conservation Program shall conform to the framework outlined in Board Letter 7-1, dated April 26, 2022. (A copy of this Board Letter may be accessed through Metropolitan’s website at https://mwdh2o.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx.) This framework includes volumetric penalties for non-compliance of up to $2,000 per acre-foot for use exceeding specified allocation limits.
(2) The Emergency Water Conservation Program shall include a provision for Member Agencies in the SWP Dependent Area to use 100 percent of their MAAP allocations for any conservation-related activities and projects, even where the water savings from such activities and projects are not readily quantifiable. Uses of MAAP funding could include drought-related actions, messaging, and code enforcement. Upon termination of the Emergency Water Conservation Program, the MAAP allocations would revert back to the previously established formula for non-documented water-saving program funding requests.
(3) The General Manager shall consult with all affected Member Agencies on the final terms of the Emergency Water Conservation Program.
(4) The General Manager shall finalize the Emergency Water Conservation Program within 30 days of Board adoption of this resolution.
(5) The Emergency Conservation Program shall continue through Jun. 30, 2023, unless otherwise terminated as described below.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is hereby directed to continue the actions and activities specified in August 17, 2021, and November 9, 2021, Board resolutions, except as expanded or limited herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby declares Metropolitan’s support for the Governor’s Executive Order N-7-22 and directs staff to work with the relevant state agencies to implement the Executive Order.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, should drought conditions persist in the coming months, or should demand management actions not sufficiently preserve available supplies, the General Manager may impose additional conditions or requirements as part of the Emergency Water Conservation Program described in Board Letter 7-1, which may include a prohibition on all outdoor uses of water or a requirement for affected Member Agencies to conform to specified volumetric limits.
5 352
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California at its meeting held on Apr. 26, 2022.
Secretary of the Board of Directors
of The Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California
6 353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
State of California
Office of Administrative Law
In re:
State Water Resources Control Board
NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EMERGENCY
REGULATORY ACTION
Regulatory Action:
Title 23, California Code of Regulations
Adopt sections: 996
Amend sections:
Repeal sections:
Government Code Sections 11346.1 and
11349.6
OAL Matter Number: 2022-0606-03
OAS Makter Type: Emergency (E)
This emergency action by the State Water Resources Control Board adopts a new regulation which .requires urban water suppliers to submit preliminary supply and demand assessments to the Department of Water Resources and to implement Level 2 demand reduction actions (actions intended to result in a 10 to 20 percent savings).
The regulation bans the irrigation of non-functional turf with potable water in commercial, industrial, and institutional. sectors and establishes that such irrigation is an infraction punishable by a fine of up to five hundred dollars for each day in which. the violation occurs pursuant to Water Code section 1058.5(d).
OAL approves this emergency regulatory action pursuant to sections 11346.1 and 11349.6 of the Government Gode. Pursuant to Water Code section 1058.5(b}, the Finding of Emergency in this matter was exempt from Office of Administrative Law Review.
This emergency regulatory action is effective on 6/10/2022 and, pursuant to Water Cade section 1058.5(c), will expire on 6/1 Q/2023. The Certificate of Compliance far this action is due no later than 6/9/2023.
Date: June 10, 2022 ~ ~~„~, ~~-,
Dale Mentink`
Assistant Chief Counsel
For: Kenneth J. Pogue
Director
Original: Eileen Sobeck, Executive
Director
Copy: Garrett Lenahan
364
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—OPfICEOFADMINiSTRA E~nw
NOTICE PUBLIC/~TIOIV For use by Secretary of State only ~n,
sr~.aootRev.ionor9l ~
~f1L FILE N07ICE FILE NUMBER REGULATORY ACTION NUMBEgR~ g~ ~g EMER~GEi NyC~Y NUMBER N1Jt~/I$~f~'a" ~~ e~
For use by Once of Administrative law (OAL)
~X ~ ~d ~ S7 ll ~ '~ ~ r ,~ ~ ~~~li~ ~~i" °• _ «<-~ only ~,'.;?~ bffi~e c u ~ ~.e~ ,'~;1 ~,° ~;,;. _ ~(fhv S~.~ of ~~~nmi~
~~~~ s~,~, jm~ rti r ~a-s~
NOTICE REGULATIONS
AGENCY WITH RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
State Water AGENCY FILE NUMBER (if any) Resources Control Board A. PUBLICATION OF NOTICE (Complete for publication in Notice Register)
1. SUBJECT OF NOTICE TITLES) FIRST SECTION AFFECTED 2. REQUESTED PUBLICATION DATE
3. NOTICE TYPE - 4. AGENCY CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER (Optional) ❑ Notice re Proposed ("—►
Re ulato tither `Action L_~
OAL USE ACTION ON PRppgSFD NOTICE
~~~Y HPP~oveaas
NOTICE. R_FGISTER NUMBER '. Pl!BUCATlpN bATE APp~cvyas t" DisapProvh~+~ S~bnnroea ~ MorliheU ~ Witharawn B. SUBMISSION OF REGULATIONS (Complete when submitting regulations) 1a. SUBJECT OF REGULATION{S) ib. ALL PREVIOUS RELATED OAL REGULATORY ACTION NUMBERS) Water Demand Reduction Emergency Regulation
2. SPECIFY CALIFORNIA CODE Of REGULATIONS TITLES) AND SECTIONS) (including title 26, if toxics related) SECTIONS} AFFECTED A°oPT
{List all section number{s) 996
`individually. Attach aMeNo
_~cidi~a~al:_sF~eeh_6f~reeded.} __~_._ _--- ____ _._ ----_ ____ -- TITLE(S) REPEAL 23 3. TYPE OF FILING
Code
Regular
§11346)
Rulemaking {Gov. ❑Certificate of Compliance: The agency officer named ~ Emergency Readopt ~ Changes Without below certifies that this agency complied with the (Gov. Code, §11346.1 (h}) Regulatory Effect {CaL Resubmittal of disapproved provisions of Gov. Code §§11346.2-11347.3 either Code Regs., title 1, §100} or withdrawn nonemergency before the emergency regulation was adopted or filing (Gov. Code §§11349.3, within the time period required by statute. 11349.4) ❑File &Print ~ Print Oniy
§11346.1(b))
Emergency (Gov. Code, ~
emergency
Resubmittal
filing
of disapproved
(Gov. Code,
or
§11346.1)
withdrawn o ocher {sPe~~~> Wafer Code Section 1058.5
4. ALL BEGINNING AND ENDING DATES OF AVAILABILITY OF MODIFIED REGULATIONS AND/OR MATERIAL ADDED TO THE RULEMAKING FILE (Cal. Code Regs. line 1, §44 and Gov. Code §11347.1)
5. EFFECTIVE DATE OF CHANGES (Gov. Code, §§ 11343.4, 11346.1(d}; Cai. Code Regs., title 1, §100 ) Effective January 1, April 1, July 1, or x Effective on filing with §100 Changes Without Effective other October 1 (Gov. Code §11343.4(a)) ❑Secretary of State ❑Regulatory Effect ❑(Specify)
6. CHECK IF THESE REGULATIONS REQUIRE NOTICE T0, OR REVIEW, CONSULTATION, APPROVAL OR CONCURRENCE BY, ANOTHER AGENCY OR ENTITY Department of Fnance (Form STD. 399) {SAM §6660) ~ Fair Political Practices Commission ~ State Fire Marshal Other {Specify)
7. CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER {Optional) E-MAIL ADdRESS (Optional) Garrett Lenahan 916 341-5179
8. (certify
of the regulation{s)
that the attached
identified
copy
on
of the regulations) is a true and correct copy For use by Office of Administrative Law (OAL) only this form, that the information specified on this form is true and correct, and #hat I am the head of the agency taking this action, or a designee of the head of the agency, and am authori2ed to make this certification.
SIGNATURE OF AGENCY HEAD OR DESIGNEE PATE
Eric Oppenheimer °'g J.~te:20]IA6➢614:24:44 7a1ySgnedbyEncOp°~ibe -0]'00'1nef 6/612022
TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNATORY
Eric Oppenheimer, Chief Deputy Director, State Water Resources Control Board 365
ADOPTED EMERGENCY REGULATION TEXT
Title 23. Waters
Division 3. State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Quality Control Boards
Chapter 3.5. Urban Water Use Efficiency and Conservation Article. 2. Prevention of Drought Wasteful Water Uses
996. Urban Drought Response Actions
~a) As used in this section:
(1) "Commercial, industrial and institutionaP' refers to commercial water users, industrial water users, and .institutional water users as respectively defined in Water Code, section 10608:12. subdivisions (e), {i ,and (j), and includes homeowners' associations, common interest developments, community service organizations, and other similar entities but does not include the residences of these entities' members or separate interests. ~2) "Common interest development' has the same meaning as in section 4100 of the Civil Code.
~3) "Community service organization or similar entity" has the same meaning as in :section 4110 of the Civi( Code.
~4) "Homeowners' association" means an "association" as defined in section 4080 of the Civil Code.
(5} "Non-functional turf" means turf that is solely ornamental and not rec~ularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events. Non-functional turf does not include sports fields and turF that is regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events.
(6} "Plant factor" has the same meaninct as in section 491. ~7) "Separate interest" has the same meaning as in section 4185 of the Civil Code. (8) "Turf" has the same meaning as in section 491.
(9} "Urban water supplier" has the same meaning as Water Code section 10617. (10) "Water shortage contingenc rLplan" means the plan required by Water Cade section 10632.
(b) Each urban water supplier shall submit to the Department of Water Resources a preliminary annual water su~ply and demand assessment consistent with section 10632.1 366
of the Water Cade no later than June 1 2022 or the effective date of this section whichever comes later, and submit a final annual water supply and demand assessment to the Department of Water Resources no later than the deadline set by section 10632.1 of the Water Code.
(i) The supplier's annual water supply and demand assessment submitted to the Department of Water`Resources demonstrates an ability to maintain reliable suppix until September 30, 2023.
Department of Water Resources.
(iii) The supplier's average number of gallons of water used per person per day by to twenty (20) gercent (Level ~, implement at a minimum the following actions:
(1) Initiate a public information and outreach campaign for water conservation and promptly and effectively reach the supplier's customers, using efforts such as ema papermail, bill inserts, customer app notifications, news articles, websites, comma events radio and television billboards and social media. potable water befinreen the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
Level 2~
(2 Notwithstanding subdivision (c)(1), urban water suppliers shall not be required to implement new residential connection moratoria pursuant to this section. residential customers for the year 2020 is below 55 gallons, as reported to the Board in the :Electronic Annual Report.
367
has authority to enforce, as infractions, the prohibitions in section 995 and takes enforcement against violations.
(e) t1) To prevent the unreasonable use of water and to promote water conservation, the use: of potable water is prohibited for the irrigation of non-functional turf at commercial, industrial and institutional sites.
(2~ Notwithstanding subdivision (e)(1~, the use of water is not prohibited by this section to the extent necessary to ensure the health of trees and other perennial non-turf plantings or to the extent necessary to address an immediate health and safety need. (3) Notwithstanding subdivision (e)(1 ~, an urban water supplier may approve a request for continued irrigation of non-functional turFwhere the user certifies that the turf is a low water use plant with a plant factor of 0.3 or less, and demonstrates the actual use is less than 40% of reference evapotranspiration.
criminal
(g) A decision or order issued under this section ~ the Board, or an officer or employee the Board, is subject to reconsideration under article 2 (commencing with section 1122) c chapter 4 of part 1 of division 2 of the Water Code.
Authority: Section 105$.5, Water Code.
References: Article X Section 2 California Constitution' Sections 4080 4100 4110 and 4185 Civil Gode~ Section 8627.7 Government Code' Sections 102 104 105 275 350
3.77, 491, 1058.5, 1122. 10608.12, 10617, 10632, and 10632.1, Water Code; Lic~hf v. Sf~ Water Resources Control Board (2Q14) 226 Cal.App.4th 1463; Stanford Vina Ranch lrrigation Co. v. State of California (20201 50 Cal.App.5th 976 368
Urgency Ordinance Amending Chapter 22,
Article VIII of the Oxnard City Code Regarding
Water Waste
City Council
November 1, 2022
Stephen Fischer
City Attorney
369
That the City Council introduce for first reading by title only and adopt an Urgency Ordinance pursuant to Government Code
section 36937, amending certain sections of Article VIII of Chapter 22 of the Oxnard City Code and implementing water conservation measures that is entitled: “AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING
CHAPTER 22, ARTICLE VIII OF THE OXNARD CITY CODE TO
COMPLY WITH AND ENFORCE EMERGENCY
DROUGHT-RELATED WATER USE RESTRICTIONS”.
RECOMMENDATION 2
370
• March 18, 2022: Department of Water Resource (DWR)
announced that State Water Project (SWP) allocations would be 5%, down from 15% the previous year
• March 28, 2022: Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-7-22 in response to the historic drought conditions
• April 26, 2022: Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) adopted a framework for an Emergency
Water Conservation Program (EWCP)
• May 17, 2022: City Council proclaimed in Resolution No. 15,569 the existence of a local emergency due to water shortage conditions and adopted new mandatory water conservation measures
BACKGROUND 3
371
• June 23, 2022: City issued Director Order 20-03 establishing a 10 minute per day per station irrigation limit with the exception of the hand watering of food plants outside of the designated watering period with use of a container or hose with a shut off nozzle in line with MWD’s EWCP
• Efficient enforcement of water conservation measures require amending certain sections in article VIII of Chapter 22 of the Oxnard City Code (OCC)
• The Urgency Ordinance provides for new water conservation measures and enforcement procedures, keeping the City in compliance with state and local mandates and helping reduce water use
BACKGROUND 4
372
• The Urgency Ordinance
• Updates the City’s Water Waste code by implementing emergency water conservation measures that apply only when the City Council or the Director of Emergency Services declares a drought emergency in the City
• Updates the enforcement mechanism for water waste violators, by issuing administrative citations for violations of permanent and emergency water conservation measures
• Allows for the hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a shut-off nozzle
• Updates the Water Waste Code to be in conformity with Oxnard’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP)
• Amends certain sections in Article VIII of Chapter 22 in the OCC.
First, the Urgency Ordinance creates a new Section 22-137 entitled “Water Waste Prohibited - Emergency Provisions”
DISCUSSION 5
373
• The financial impact of adopting this ordinance is unknown • City staff, particularly code compliance officers and water utility staff, will spend additional time investigating water waste violations, issuing water waste citations, and participating in the review hearing process
FINANCIAL IMPACT 6
374
QUESTIONS
7 375
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.4
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen Fischer, City Attorney, (805) 385-7483, [email protected] SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Chapter 22, Article VIII of the Oxnard City Code Regarding Water Waste (NonUrgency). (20 minutes)
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council introduce for first reading by title only an Ordinance amending certain sections of Article VIII of Chapter 22 of the Oxnard City Code and implementing water conservation measures that is entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING CHAPTER 22, ARTICLE
VIII OF THE OXNARD CITY CODE TO COMPLY WITH AND ENFORCE EMERGENCY DROUGHT-RELATED WATER USE RESTRICTIONS”.
(This item did not originate in Committee.)
Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video:
https://youtu.be/GeD2lAVRq1Y
BACKGROUND
California is experiencing a drought emergency following the three driest years on record.
On March 18, 2022, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) announced that State Water Project (SWP) allocations would be 5%, down from 15% the previous year. Following the announcement, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) indicated that SWP dependent regions of its service area have insufficient supplies to meet current water demands.
The Calleguas Municipal Water District (CMWD) receives most of its water from MWD via the SWP, receiving 80% of its water from outside sources. The City of Oxnard receives up to 40% of its water from CMWD.
On March 28, 2022, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-7-22 in response to the historic drought conditions.
The Order requires all water providers to implement a minimum Stage 2 of their Water Shortage Contingency Plans (WSCP). On April 6, 2022, CMWD declared a Stage 3 Water Shortage and called on all water users within its service area to immediately reduce water use by up to 30%.
On April 26, 2022 MWD adopted a framework for an Emergency Water Conservation Program (EWCP) to reduce nonessential water use and preserve available supply for the greatest public benefit in SWP dependent areas. The framework includes two paths for affected MWD Member Agencies to reduce the use of SWP supplies: 1) reduce outdoor watering to one-day per week or 2) meet a monthly allocation limit. Thereafter, CMWD adopted an Emergency Water Conservation Program including the two path compliance framework consistent with that of MWD. 376
On May 17, 2022 City Council proclaimed in Resolution No. 15,569 the existence of a local emergency due to water shortage conditions and adopted new mandatory water conservation measures consistent with Stage 2 of the City’s WSCP. One week later, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted an emergency regulation implementing a statewide ban on the use of potable water for irrigating non-functional turf at commercial, industrial and institutional properties, including Home Owners Associations (“HOAs”). The SWRCB has defined non-functional turf as “turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events.” The SWRCB regulation will remain in effect for one year, unless the SWRCB modifies, readopts, or lifts the regulation before then.
In response, the City issued Director Order 20-03 on June 23, 2022, establishing a 10 minute per day per station irrigation limit with the exception of the hand watering of food plants outside of the designated watering period with use of a container or hose with a shut off nozzle in line with MWD’s EWCP. The Director Order also banned the use of potable water for irrigation of non-functional turf at Commercial, Industrial and Institutional properties, including Home Owner Associations (HOA) in line with SWRCB’s emergency regulation.
Efficient enforcement of water conservation measures requires amending certain sections in article VIII of Chapter 22 of the Oxnard City Code (OCC). The Ordinance provides for new water conservation measures and enforcement procedures, keeping the City in compliance with state and local mandates and helping reduce water use.
DISCUSSION
This Ordinance is also before the Council as Agenda Item L.2, which is proceeding as an Urgency Ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 36937, subdivision (b). The Ordinances and their amendments to Chapter 22, Article VIII are identical. The Urgency Ordinance, if adopted by the Council, will go into effect immediately. Whereas the earliest the regular ordinance could go into effect is January of 2023. The Urgency Ordinance provides the City with the immediate ability to comply with and enforce water waste prohibitions and water conservation measures required during a declared drought emergency, while the Regular Ordinance is pending before the Council.
The Ordinance updates the City’s Water Waste Code by implementing emergency water conservation measures that apply only when the City Council or the Director of Emergency Services declares a drought emergency in the City.
Additionally, the Ordinance updates the enforcement mechanism for water waste violators, by issuing administrative citations for violations of permanent and emergency water conservation measures. The water conservation measures set forth in the Ordinance implement restrictions on the watering of non-functional turf—defined as turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events, and limiting outdoor irrigation to a certain number of days per week.
The Ordinance allows for the hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a shut-off nozzle. The use of drip irrigation or other high-efficiency irrigation systems to apply water at a weekly volume consistent with the watering restriction is allowed. Sports activity fields may irrigate more frequently, but only as necessary to maintain the playing surface quality and is dependent upon the drought stage as declared by the City Council or Director of Emergency Services.
The Ordinance also updates the Water Waste Code to be in conformity with Oxnard’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP). The WSCP created six stages of drought and corresponding water conservation measures for the City to apply depending on the drought stage the City is facing. Currently, the City is in a Stage 2 drought.
This Ordinance amends certain sections in Article VIII of Chapter 22 in the OCC. First, the Ordinance creates a new Section 22-137 entitled “Water Waste Prohibited - Emergency Provisions”. This section addresses day-to-day water waste prohibitions that correspond to a particular drought stage. Second, sections 22-138 and 139 replace the prior enforcement scheme and create an administrative violation process. The first two violation notices are informational. The administrative fine scheme in Section 22-138 is for repeat and egregious offenders. The fine amounts are as follows:
$100 for a third violation, $300 for a fourth violation and $700 for a fifth violation. Additional violations could be subject to the installation of flow restricting devices. The City is currently responding to water waste violations with an informational approach, and has gained compliance with this method.
The water waste prohibitions shall only be in effect when the City Council or Director of Emergency Services proclaim a drought emergency. If and when the proclamation of a drought emergency ceases or is rescinded by City Council, these 377
prohibitions, while still available in the OCC, will not be in effect or enforced. Conversely, the permanent water waste provisions in Section 22-136 shall apply at all times and will be enforced under the same administrative process and fine schedule as the emergency water waste provisions.
Provided there is an operative motion by Council on this Ordinance at the November 1, 2022 council meeting, this item will be brought to Council at the December 6, 2022 meeting for consideration by the Council for adoption of the Ordinance. Staff will continue to implement a vigorous public information campaign to notify City water customers of the increased level of water conservation requirements with a focus on gaining willful compliance. The City will increase the level of monitoring, notification, and enforcement as necessary and may assess fines and penalties for violations of the Ordinance. Staff will be seeking funding from MWD to aid in the enforcement activities, such as water waste patrols.
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports the Infrastructure and Natural Resources strategy. The purpose of the Infrastructure and Natural Resources strategy is to preserve and improve our roads, utilities, parks, trees, water supply and natural resources through effective planning, prioritization, and an equitable and efficient use of available funding.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The financial impact of adopting this ordinance is unknown. City staff, particularly code compliance officers and water utility staff will spend additional time investigating water waste violations, issuing water waste citations, and participating in the review hearing process. These activities will occur in the normal course of duty, but may result in increased expenditures associated with water conservation compliance efforts.
COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee.
Prepared by: Chelsey Ballot, Deputy City Attorney, Michelle McCarron, Assistant City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS
1. Water Waste Regular Ordinance
2. 10.19.21-Drought-SOE-1
3. 22-03 2022 SWP Allocation Decrease 5 Percent 031822
4. March-2022-Drought-EO
5. MET Resolution-9305-signed
6. Calleguas Reso 2042_042722
7. Oxnard Reso 15,569
8. 2022-0606-03E-Approval
9. Water Waste Ordinance Presentation
378
Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD
ORDINANCE NO. ____________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING CHAPTER 22, ARTICLE VIII OF THE OXNARD CITY CODE TO COMPLY WITH AND
ENFORCE EMERGENCY DROUGHT-RELATED WATER USE RESTRICTIONS WHEREAS, the Oxnard City Council adopted a water waste ordinance, codified in Chapter 22, Article VIII of the Oxnard City Code (OCC), and in 2020 adopted a Water Shortage Contingency Plan; and
WHEREAS, OCC Chapter 22 Article VIII includes permanent water waste measures, and the City Council desires to implement emergency water waste measures; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency exists in all California counties due to ongoing drought conditions; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2022 the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) declared that State Water Project (SWP) allocations would be reduced from 15% to 5%; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2022, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-7-22 requiring all water providers to implement, at minimum, Stage 2 of their Water Shortage Contingency Plans (WSCP) and reduce water use by 20-30%; and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2022, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Board (MWD) adopted an Emergency Water Conservation Program, declaring a Water Shortage Emergency in SWP dependent areas due to insufficient supplies to meet current water demands and that the Emergency Water Conservation Program shall continue through June 30, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on April 27, 2022, Calleguas Municipal Water District (CMWD), a SWP dependent agency, declared a Stage 3 Water Shortage requiring all water users within the service area to immediately reduce water use by up to 30%; and
WHEREAS, the City receives up to 40% of its water from the CMWD; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2022, the Oxnard City Council approved Resolution No. 15,569 declaring a Stage 2 water shortage exists within the city; and 379
Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
WHEREAS, on June 10 2022, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted an emergency regulation, effective immediately, prohibiting the irrigation of non-functional turf with potable water at commercial, industrial, and institutional sites including homeowners’ associations, condominiums, retirement communities, and other housing developments comprised of individually owned units and shared facilities. The SWRCB regulation defines non-functional turf as turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events; and WHEREAS, the City intends to comply with state and local water conservation mandates, in addition to the conservation mandates as stated in the Oxnard Water Shortage Contingency Plan by implementing this Urgency Ordinance to facilitate the reduction of water use during emergency drought conditions, by limiting outdoor irrigation and implementing other water conservation measures as set forth in the Urgency Ordinance; and WHEREAS, all other permanent water conservation measures in the Oxnard City Code remain in effect; and
WHEREAS, additional water use restrictions are anticipated to be issued by the State of California, MWD, and/or CMWD, therefore the City Manager / Director of Emergency Services is authorized to implement those requirements and shall submit additional water conservation measures to the City Council for ratification in its discretion at a future meeting; and
WHEREAS, Any violation of this Urgency Ordinance shall be subject to civil fines and administrative review and appeal procedures set forth in OCC Chapter 7, Article III; and WHEREAS, The City Council determines that the OCC must be further reviewed and possibly revised to protect the public against potential negative health, safety, and welfare impacts associated with the severe water shortage if water conservation goals are not achieved or additional conservation measures are mandated; and
WHEREAS, The City intends to study, within a reasonable time, amendments required to the OCC to effectively meet state and local water conservation mandates.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Part 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The findings and determinations reflected above are true and correct, and are incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein as the cause and foundation for the action taken by and through this Ordinance. 380
Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
Part 2. Codified Amendment. The City Clerk is directed to request that the publisher of the City Code add thereto the amendments listed in Part 3 of this Ordinance to Chapter 22, Article VIII as set forth below.
Part 3. Addition to the Oxnard Municipal Code. The Oxnard Municipal Code is amended by renumbering current Sections 22-137 through 22-142 to read as Sections 22-138 through 22-143 in Chapter 22, Article VIII; creating a new Section 22-137 to include emergency water waste provisions; and amending new Sections 22-138, 22-139, 22-140 (formerly Sections 22-137, 22-138, 22-139) in Chapter 22 Article VIII to read as follows:
ARTICLE VIII. WATER WASTE
SEC. 22-137 WATER WASTE PROHIBITED – EMERGENCY PROVISIONS (A) The city council further declares during emergency drought conditions when the city council has adopted a declaration or resolution declaring a water shortage emergency that further emergency water conservation measures shall be mandatory on all persons using city water within city limits, and persons using city water outside the city limits but within the Oxnard Municipal Water’s service area, and are in addition to the conservation measures in Section 22-136.
(B) Therefore, the city council orders the emergency restrictions on water use as specified below:
(1) Stage 1 (10% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a stage 1 water supply condition:
(a) Water Days. Outdoor Irrigation is limited to three days per week using a landscape irrigation system or a watering device. The outdoor irrigation measures set forth in Section 22-136(B)(1) through (4) apply to this provision.
These outdoor irrigation restrictions do not apply to the following categories:
(i) The hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with use of a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a positive self closing shut-off nozzle;
(ii) The use of drip irrigation systems to apply water at a weekly volume consistent with the three days per week watering restriction; (iii) Irrigation of sport activity fields as necessary to maintain playing surface quality.
(2) Stage 2 (10-20% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 2 water supply condition:
(a) Water Days. Outdoor Irrigation is limited to two days per week using a landscape irrigation system or a watering device for no more than 10 minutes per day per station. The outdoor irrigation measures set forth in Section 22- 136(B)(1),(2) and (4) apply to this provision. These outdoor irrigation restrictions do not apply to the following categories:
(i) The hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with use of 381
Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a positive self closing shut-off nozzle;
(ii) The use of drip irrigation systems to apply water at a weekly volume consistent with the two days per week watering restriction; (iii) Irrigation of sport activity fields as necessary to maintain playing surface quality.
(b) Watering of non-functional turf, which is turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events at commercial, industrial and institutional properties, including Home Owners Associations (“HOAs”) is prohibited.
(c) Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired promptly, and in no event more than 48 hours after discovery or receipt of notice from the City. (d) Limits on Filling Ornamental Ponds or Fountains. Filling or refilling ornamental lakes or fountains is prohibited, except to the extent needed to sustain aquatic life, provided that aquatic life has been actively managed within the ornamental pond or fountain prior to declaration of a stage 2 water supply condition.
(3) Stage 3 (20-30% reduction in available supplies) The following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 3 water supply condition:
(a) Water Days. Outdoor Irrigation is limited to one day per week, using a landscape irrigation system or a watering device for no more than 10 minutes per station. The outdoor irrigation measures set forth in Section 22-136(B)(1), (2) and (4) apply to this provision. These restrictions do not apply to the following categories:
(i) The hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with use of a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a positive self closing shut-off nozzle;
(ii) The use of drip irrigation systems to apply water at a weekly volume consistent with the one day per week watering restriction; (iii) Irrigation of sport activity fields as necessary to maintain playing surface quality.
(b) Watering of non-functional turf, which is turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events, at commercial, industrial and institutional properties, including Home Owners Associations (“HOAs”) is prohibited.
(c) Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired promptly, and in no event more than 24 hours after discovery or receipt of notice from the City. (d) Limits on Filling Ornamental Ponds or Fountains. Filling or refilling ornamental lakes or fountains is prohibited, except to the extent needed to sustain aquatic life, provided that aquatic life has been actively managed within the ornamental pond or fountain prior to declaration of a stage 3 water supply condition.
382
Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
(4) Stage 4 (30-40% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 4 water supply condition:
(a) Water Days. Outdoor Irrigation is prohibited. This restriction does not apply to the following category:
(i) The hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with use of a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a positive self closing shut-off nozzle.
(ii) The use of drip irrigation systems to apply water as needed for trees, food plants or other perennials.
(b) Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired promptly, and in no event more than 24 hours after discovery or receipt of notice from the City. (c) Limits on Filling Ornamental Ponds or Fountains. Filling or refilling ornamental lakes or fountains is prohibited, except to the extent needed to sustain aquatic life, provided that aquatic life has been actively managed within the ornamental pond or fountain prior to declaration of a stage 4 water supply condition.
(5) Stage 5 (40-50% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 5 water supply condition:
(a) Water. Watering with potable water is prohibited. This restriction does not apply to the following categories:
(i) Maintenance of vegetation, including trees and food plants; (ii) Maintenance of existing landscape necessary for fire protection; (iii) Maintenance of existing landscape for erosion control; (iv) Maintenance of plant materials identified to be rare or essential to the well-being of protected species;
(b) Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired promptly, and in no event more than 24 hours after discovery or receipt of notice from the City. (6) Stage 6 (Greater than 50% reduction in available supplies). The following water conservation requirements apply during a declared stage 6 water supply condition:
(a) Water. Outdoor Irrigation with potable water is prohibited. (b) Prompt Leak Repair. All leaks, breaks or malfunction within a plumbing or water distribution system shall be repaired immediately upon discovery or receipt of notice from the City.
SEC. 22-138. FAILURE TO COMPLY
Any violation of the provisions of this article shall be prosecuted as an administrative citation, pursuant to Chapter 7, Article III or as a criminal citation pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 1, Section 1-10 as determined by the City Attorney. The following administrative remedies shall be imposed against any person for violation(s) of this Article:
383
Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
(A) For the first violation, a written warning shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring.
(B) For the second violation during a 12-month period, a written notice to correct the violation shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring. (C) For the third violation during a 12-month period, an administrative citation and fine in the amount of $100.00 shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring. (D) For the fourth violation during a 12-month period an administrative citation and fine in the amount of $300.00 shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring. (E) For the fifth violation during a 12-month period an administrative citation and fine in the amount of $700.00 shall be issued to the responsible person or entity listed on the water service record for the location where the violation occurred or is occurring. (F) (1) For a Sixth violation during a 12-month period, and upon a written notice of violation, the city shall be able to install, at the expense of the responsible person or entity, a flow-restricting device of one gallon per minute capacity on the location receiving water service through up to 1½-inch size distribution systems and comparatively sized restricting devices on locations receiving water service through larger distribution systems. These devices shall be installed for a period of not less than 48 hours on the service of the responsible person at the location at which the violation occurred. (2) The charge for installation of such a flow-restricting device shall be based upon the size of the responsible person's or entity’s meter and the actual cost of installation. (3) The flow-restricting device shall remain installed until removed as authorized by the city manager. The charge for removal of the flow-restricting device and restoration of normal service shall be based on the city's actual cost.
(4) For any violations after the sixth violation during a 12-month period, the city may discontinue water service to the violator at the location at which the violation(s) occurred, or impose such other penalty as deemed appropriate by the city manager, until such time that the city manager determines that further violations are not likely to occur.
SEC. 22-139. NOTICE TO CUSTOMER.
(A) The city shall provide notice of each violation of this article to the responsible person or entity at the location where the violation occurred, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 7, Article III, Sections 7-54 and 7-55 and as follows:
(1) For a first violation and subsequent violations, the city shall give written notice of the fact of such violation to the responsible person by personal service, by delivery through regular United States mail addressed to the customer's residence, or any other means reasonably designed to notify the responsible person or entity of the violation. (2) If the installation of a flow restrictor is scheduled, or the discontinuance of water service to the responsible person for any period of time may occur, advance notice shall be given in the following manner:
384
Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
(a) Written notice to the responsible person by personal service; (b) If the responsible person is absent from or unavailable at either the customer's residence or place of business, by leaving a copy of the notice with an adult at either location, and by delivery of the notice through regular United States mail addressed to the customer at either the responsible person's place of business or residence; or (c) If such residence and place of business cannot be ascertained, or an adult cannot be found at the location of the violation, then by affixing a copy of the notice in a conspicuous place at the location where the violation has occurred, and by delivery of a copy of the notice through regular United States mail addressed to the responsible person at the responsible person's water utility billing address and to the subject location. (B) All notices shall contain, in addition to the facts of the violation, a statement of the possible remedies for each violation, a statement informing the responsible person of his/her right to an administrative hearing on the violation, the amount of the fine, the date and time the water flow shall be restricted, or the water service discontinued.
SEC. 22-140. RIGHT TO HEARING.
(A) Any responsible person against whom a fine has been issued or on whose water service is scheduled for flow restriction, or whose water service may be discontinued, shall have a right to a hearing to be conducted by a person selected by the city manager. The responsible person shall file the written request for a hearing or complete an administrative hearing request form with the city manager's designee within 30 days of the date of notification of the violation and intended remedy. All hearings shall be conducted in conformity with the provisions of this Section, Chapter 7, Article III, Sections 7-58 through 7-63, and Chapter 1 Article III.
(B) A responsible person against whom a fine has been issued may request a waiver of fine deposit pursuant to Chapter 7, Article III, section 7-59. (C) (1) The hearing shall be conducted promptly following the request for hearing. The responsible person may present any relevant evidence at the hearing which tends to show that the alleged violation has not occurred.
(2) The formal rules of evidence shall not apply and all relevant evidence customarily relied upon by reasonable persons in the conduct of serious business affairs shall be admissible, unless a sound objection warrants its exclusion. (3) The decision of the city manager's designee shall be final and exhaust the administrative process.
(D) The responsible person may seek judicial review of the hearing officer's decision by filing an appeal with the Ventura County Superior Court Clerk within 20 calendar days after the responsible person receives a copy of the notice of decision in accordance with Cal. Gov't Code, Section 53069.4. Any appeal filed with the superior court shall contain a proof of service showing that a copy of the appeal was served upon the city. The responsible person must pay the appropriate filing fees.
SEC. 22-141. RESTORATION OF DISCONTINUED WATER SERVICE. 385
Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
When water service is discontinued, the service shall be restored upon the following conditions:
(A) Proof submitted by the violator of correction of the condition or activity satisfactory to the city manager or his designee; and
(B) Payment of the estimated restoration charge, including the cost of any inspection fees or required staff time, and all other fees and charges still outstanding, including, but not limited to, fines and/or installation and removal charges for flow restrictors.
SEC. 22-142. LIMITATIONS ON CURTAILMENT.
Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to allow the city to curtail the supply of water to any customer when, in the discretion of the city manager or Ventura County Environmental Health Department, such water is required by that customer to maintain a minimum level of public health and safety.
SEC. 22-143. ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL.
The employees of the police, fire, development services and public works departments and other designated persons shall be responsible for enforcement of the various sections of this article under their respective authority or as is specifically assigned to them by the city manager.
Part 4. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City Council exercises its independent judgment and fins that this ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, sections: 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment); 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378); and 15061(b)(3), because the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies on to projects that will have a significant effect on the environment. There is no possibility that the passage of this ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA.
Part 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The Council of the City of Oxnard hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.
Part 6. Pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code Section 36933(c)(1), the City Attorney was designated to prepare, and the City Clerk published, a summary of this ordinance, and a certified copy of the ordinance was posted in the Office of the City Clerk a minimum of five days before the City Council’s adoption of the ordinance.
386
Ordinance No._______
November 1, 2022
Part 7. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the summary thereof to be published within fifteen (15) days of the adoption and shall post a certified copy of this ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933. Ordinance No. ________was first read on November 1, 2022, and finally adopted on ___________________, 2022 to become effective thirty days thereafter.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________________
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________________
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________________
Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney
387
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY
WHEREAS climate change continues to intensify the impacts of droughts on our communities, environment, and economy, and California is in a second consecutive year of dry conditions, resulting in drought in all parts of the State and extreme or exceptional drought in most of the State; and
WHEREAS the meteorological summer in California and the rest of the western United States was the hottest on record; and WHEREAS on April 12, 2021, May l 0, 2021, and July 8, 2021, I proclaimed states of emergency to exist in the counties of Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Marin, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Benito, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, and Yuba, due to severe drought conditions; and WHEREAS since my July 8, 2021 Proclamation, sustained and extreme high temperatures have increased water loss from reservoirs and streams, increased demands by communities and agriculture, and further depleted California's water supplies; and
WHEREAS the counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, and Ventura are now experiencing severe drought conditions; and
WHEREAS long-term weather forecasts for the winter rainy season, dire storage conditions of California's largest reservoirs, low moisture content in native vegetation, and parched soils, magnify the likelihood that drought impacts will continue in 2022 and beyond; and WHEREAS the increasing frequency of multiyear droughts presents a significant risk to California's ability to ensure adequate water supplies for communities, agriculture, and fish and wildlife; and
WHEREAS the most impactful action Californians can take to extend available supplies is to re-double their efforts to voluntarily reduce their water use by 15 percent from their 2020 levels by implementing the commonsense measures identified in operative paragraph l of my July 8, 2021 Executive Order N-10-21; and
WHEREAS it is necessary to expeditiously mitigate the effects of the drought conditions to ensure the protection of health, safety, and the environment; and
WHEREAS under Government Code Section 8558(b), I find that the conditions caused by the drought, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single local government and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to appropriately respond; and 388
WHEREAS under Government Code Section 8625( c), I find that local authority is inadequate to cope with the drought conditions; and WHEREAS to protect public health and safety, it is critical the State take certain immediate actions without undue delay to prepare for and mitigate the effects of the drought conditions, and under Government Code Section 8571, I find that strict compliance with various statutes and regulations specified in this Proclamation would prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the drought conditions.
NOW THEREFORE, I, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, in accordance with the authority vested in me by the State Constitution and statutes, including the California Emergency Services Act, and in particular, Section 8625, HEREBY PROCLAIM A STATE OF EMERGENCY to exist in the State due to drought in the remaining counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, and Ventura, such that the drought state of emergency is now in effect statewide.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. All agencies of the state government are to utilize and employ state personnel, equipment, and facilities for the performance of any and all activities consistent with the direction of the Governor's Office of Emergency Services and the State Emergency Plan. Also, to protect their safety, all residents are to obey the direction of emergency officials with regard to this emergency in order to protect their safety.
2. The orders and provisions contained in my April 21, 2021, May 10, 2021, and July 8, 2021 Proclamations remain in full force and effect, except as modified herein. State agencies shall continue to implement all directions from those Proclamations and accelerate implementation where feasible.
3. Operative paragraphs 3, 5, 6, and 10 of my July 8, 2021 Proclamation are withdrawn and replaced with paragraphs 4 through 8 below.
4. Consistent with the policies stated in Water Code Section 1Ol 1.5(a), local agencies are encouraged to take actions to coordinate use of their available supplies and to substitute an alternate supply of groundwater from existing groundwater wells for the unused portion of surface water that the local agency is otherwise entitled to use.
For actions taken pursuant to this paragraph, the provisions of Chapter 3 ( commencing with Section 85225) of Part 3 of Division 35 of the Water Code and regulations adopted pursuant thereto are suspended for any (a) actions taken by state agencies pursuant to this paragraph, (b) actions taken by a local agency where the state agency with primary responsibility for implementing the directive concurs that local action is required, and (c) permits or approvals necessary to carry out actions under (a) or (b). The entities implementing this paragraph shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals that rely on the suspension of the foregoing Water Code provisions.
389
5. To support voluntary approaches where hydrology and other conditions allow, the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) shall expeditiously consider water transfer requests. For purposes of carrying out this paragraph, the following requirements of the Water Code are suspended:
a. Section l 726(d) requirements for written notice and newspaper publication, provided that the Water Board shall post notice on its website and provide notice through
electronic subscription services where interested persons can request information about temporary changes; and
b. Section l 726(f) requirement of a 30-day comment period, provided that the Water Board shall afford a 15-day
comment period.
6. As necessary to assist local governments and for the protection of public health and the environment, state agencies shall enter into contracts to arrange for the procurement of materials, goods, and services necessary to quickly assist with the response to and recovery from the impacts of the drought. Applicable provisions of the Government Code and the Public Contract Code, including but not limited to travel, advertising, and competitive bidding requirements, are suspended to the extent necessary to address the effects of the drought. Approval of the Department of Finance is required prior to the execution of any contract entered into pursuant to this provision.
7. To proactively prevent situations where a community runs out of drinking water, the Water Board, the Department of Water Resources, the Office of Emergency Services, and the Office of Planning and Research shall assist local agencies with identifying acute drinking water shortages in domestic water supplies, and shall work with local agencies in implementing solutions to those water shortages.
8. To preserve the State's surface and groundwater supplies and better prepare for the potential for continued dry conditions next year, local water suppliers are directed to execute their urban Water Shortage Contingency Plans and agricultural Drought Plans at a level appropriate to local conditions that takes into account the possibility of a third consecutive dry year. Suppliers shall ensure that Urban and Agricultural Water Management Plans are up to date and in place.
9. The Water Board may adopt emergency regulations, as it deems necessary, to supplement voluntary conservation by prohibiting certain wasteful water practices. Wasteful water uses include:
a. The use of potable water for washing sidewalks, driveways, buildings, structures, patios, parking lots, or _other hardsurfaced areas, except in cases where health and safety are at risk.
b. The use of potable water that results in flooding or runoff in gutters or streets.
390
c. The use of potable water, except with the use of a positive shut-off nozzle, for the individual private washing of motor vehicles.
d. The use of water to irrigate turf and ornamental landscapes during and within 48 hours after measurable rainfall of at least one-fourth of one inch of rain.
e. The use of potable water for irrigation of ornamental turf on public street medians.
f. The use of potable water for street cleaning or construction purposes, unless no other source of water or other method can be used or if necessary, to protect the health and safety of the public.
g. The use of potable water for decorative fountains or the filling or topping-off of decorative lakes or ponds, with exceptions for those decorative fountains, lakes, or ponds which utilize recycled water.
10.The California Department of Food and Agriculture, in collaboration with other relevant state agencies, shall evaluate water efficiency measures implemented in California agriculture over the past · several years and develop a report with recommendations on how to further increase efficiencies.
11. The Office of Emergency Services shall provide assistance under the authority of the California Disaster Assistance Act, Government Code section 8680 et seq., and California Code of Regulations, title 19, section 2900 et seq., as appropriate to provide for, or in support of, the temporary emergency supply, delivery, or both of drinking water or water for sanitation purposes.
12. For purposes of carrying out or approving any actions contemplated by the directives in operative paragraphs 5, 6, and 9, the environmental review by state agencies required by the California Environmental Quality Act in Public Resources Code, Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought.
For purposes of carrying out the directive in operative paragraph 4 and 7, for any (a) actions taken by the listed state agencies pursuant to that directive, (b) actions taken by a local agency where the Office of Planning and Research concurs that local action is required, and (c) permits necessary to carry out actions under (a) or (b), Public Resources Code, Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought. The entities implementing these directives shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals for which these provisions are suspended.
This Proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any rights or benefits, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against the State of California, its agencies, departments, entities, officers, employees, or any other person.
391
I FURTHER DIRECT that as soon as hereafter possible, this Proclamation be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State and that widespread publicity and notice be given of this Proclamation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have
hereunto set my hand and caused
the Great Seal of the State of
Ca · · ixed this 19th day
er
overnor of California
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY N. WEBER, PH..D.
Secretary of State
392
State of California DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES California Natural Resources Agency
CALIFORNIA STATE WATER PROJECT
NOTICE TO STATE WATER PROJECT CONTRACTORS
DWR 9625 (Rev. 3/12) Page 1 of 1
Date: March 18, 2022
Number: 22-03
Subject: 2022 State Water Project Table A Allocation Decrease from 15 to 5 Percent .
From: Original signed by
Ted Craddock
Deputy Director, State Water Project
Department of Water Resources
Based on the driest January and February in more than 100 years and other aspects of current water supply conditions, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) is decreasing the State Water Project (SWP) Table A Allocation from 15 percent to 5 percent of most SWP long-term contractors’ 2022 requested Table A amounts. Attached is the revised 2022 SWP allocation table.
In addition, DWR will continue to allocate water to meet the human health and safety (HH&S) needs as defined in NTC 21-07 issued on December 1, 2021. Please note that this revised Table A Allocation will continue to reduce, on a 1:1 basis, any HH&S need volumes that were previously identified in the SWP contractors’ submittals to DWR.
This Table A Allocation decrease is made consistent with the long-term water supply contracts, legal requirements, and public policy. In determining available SWP supplies, DWR has considered several factors including SWP contractors’ 2022 demand, existing storage in SWP conservation reservoirs, estimates of future runoff under very dry conditions, SWP operational and regulatory constraints such as, federal Endangered Species Act, California Endangered Species Act requirements, and water rights obligations under the State Water Resources Control Board’s authority. DWR may revise this and any subsequent allocations if warranted by the year’s developing hydrologic conditions and available SWP water supplies.
To develop the 5 percent water delivery schedule, DWR will utilize the SWP Contractors’ 5 percent schedules that were submitted in October 2021 (as part of initial requests), including any subsequent updates that may have been provided to DWR. If a Contractor foresees significant changes to previously submitted schedules (including HH&S needs), they are requested to communicate such changes to DWR at the earliest possible time.
DWR will provide approved monthly water delivery schedules to the SWP Contractors.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact John Leahigh, Water Operations Executive Manager, at (916) 902-9876.
Attachment
393
Attachment
2022 STATE WATER PROJECT ALLOCATION
SWP CONTRACTORS TABLE A
(Acre-Feet)
(1)
INITIAL REQUEST
(Acre-Feet)
(2)
APPROVED
ALLOCATION
(Acre-Feet)
(3)
PERCENT INITIAL
REQUEST
APPROVED
(4) = (3)/(2)
FEATHER RIVER
County of Butte 27,500 27,500 3,000 11%
Plumas County FC&WCD 2,700 2,700 135 5%
City of Yuba City 9,600 9,600 1,440 15%
Subtotal 39,800 39,800 4,575
NORTH BAY
Napa County FC&WCD 29,025 29,025 4,354 15%
Solano County WA 47,756 47,756 7,164 15%
Subtotal 76,781 76,781 11,518
SOUTH BAY
Alameda County FC&WCD, Zone 7 80,619 80,619 4,031 5%
Alameda County WD 42,000 42,000 2,100 5%
Santa Clara Valley WD 100,000 100,000 5,000 5%
Subtotal 222,619 222,619 11,131
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY
Oak Flat WD 5,700 5,700 285 5%
County of Kings 9,305 9,305 466 5%
Dudley Ridge WD 41,350 41,350 2,068 5%
Empire West Side ID 3,000 3,000 150 5%
Kern County WA 982,730 982,730 49,137 5%
Tulare Lake Basin WSD 87,471 87,471 4,374 5%
Subtotal 1,129,556 1,129,556 56,480
CENTRAL COASTAL
San Luis Obispo County FC&WCD 25,000 25,000 1,250 5%
Santa Barbara County FC&WCD 45,486 45,486 2,275 5%
Subtotal 70,486 70,486 3,525
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Antelope Valley-East Kern WA 144,844 144,844 7,243 5%
Santa Clarita Valley WA 95,200 95,200 4,760 5%
Coachella Valley WD 138,350 138,350 6,918 5%
Crestline-Lake Arrowhead WA 5,800 5,800 290 5%
Desert WA 55,750 55,750 2,788 5%
Littlerock Creek ID 2,300 2,300 115 5%
Metropolitan WDSC 1,911,500 1,911,500 95,575 5%
Mojave WA 89,800 89,800 4,490 5%
Palmdale WD 21,300 21,300 1,065 5%
San Bernardino Valley MWD 102,600 102,600 5,130 5%
San Gabriel Valley MWD 28,800 28,800 1,440 5%
San Gorgonio Pass WA 17,300 17,300 865 5%
Ventura County WPD 20,000 20,000 1,000 5%
Subtotal 2,633,544 2,633,544 131,679
TOTAL 4,172,786 4,172,786 218,908 5%
394
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXECUTIVE ORDER N-7-22
WHEREAS on April 12, 202 l, May l 0, 2021, July 8, 202 l, and October 19, 2021, I proclaimed states of emergency that continue today and exist across all the counties of California, due to extreme and expanding drought conditions; and
WHEREAS climate change continues to intensify the impacts of droughts on our communities, environment, and economy, and California is in a third consecutive year of dry conditions, resulting in continuing drought in all parts of the State; and
WHEREAS the 21st century to date has been characterized by record warmth and predominantly dry conditions, and the 2021 meteorological summer in California and the rest of the western United States was the hottest on record; and
WHEREAS since my October 19, 2021 Proclamation, early rains in October and December 2021 gave way to the driest January and February in recorded history for the watersheds that provide much of California's water supply; and WHEREAS the ongoing drought will have significant, immediate impacts on communities with vulnerable water supplies, farms that rely on irrigation to grow food and fiber, and fish and wildlife that rely on stream flows and cool water; and
WHEREAS the two largest reservoirs of the Central Valley Project, which supplies water to farms and communities in the Central Valley and the Santa Clara Valley and provides critical cold-water habitat for salmon and other anadromous fish, have water storage levels that are approximately l .1 million acre-feet below last year's low levels on this date; and WHEREAS the record-breaking dry period in January and February and the absence of significant rains in March have required the Department of Water Resources to reduce anticipated deliveries from the State Water Project to 5 percent of requested supplies; and
WHEREAS delivery of water by bottle or truck is necessary to protect human safety and public health in those places where water supplies are disrupted; and
WHEREAS groundwater use accounts for 41 percent of the State's total water supply on an average annual basis but as much as 58 percent in a critically dry year, and approximately 85 percent of public water systems rely on groundwater as their primary supply; and
WHEREAS coordination between local entities that approve permits for new groundwater wells and local groundwater sustainability agencies is important to achieving sustainable levels of groundwater in critically overdrafted basins; and
395
WHEREAS the duration of the drought, especially following a multiyear drought that abated only five years ago, underscores the need for California to redouble near-, medium-, and long-term efforts to adapt its water management and delivery systems to a changing climate, shifting precipitation patterns, and water scarcity; and
WHEREAS the most consequential, immediate action Californians can take to extend available supplies is to voluntarily reduce their water use by 15 percent from their 2020 levels by implementing the commonsense measures identified in operative paragraph 1 of Executive Order N-10-21 (July 8, 2021 ); and
WHEREAS to protect public health and safety, it is critical the State take certain immediate actions without undue delay to prepare for and mitigate the effects of the drought conditions, and under Government Code section 8571, I find that strict compliance with various statutes and regulations specified in this Proclamation would prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the drought conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, in accordance with the authority vested in me by the State Constitution and statutes, including the California Emergency Services Act, and in particular, Government Code sections 8567, 8571, and 8627, do hereby issue the following Order to become effective immediately:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The orders and provisions contained in my April 21, 2021, May 10, 2021, July 8, 2021, and October 19, 2021 Proclamations remain in fu ll force and effect, except as modified by those Proclamations and herein.
State agencies shall continue to implement all directions from those Proclamations and accelerate implementation where feasible.
2. To help the State achieve its conservation goals and ensure sufficient water for essential indoor and outdoor use, I call on all Californians to strive to limit summertime water use and to use water more efficiently indoors and out. The statewide Save Our Water conservation campaign at SaveOurWater.com provides simple ways for Californians to reduce water use in their everyday lives. Furthermore, I encourage Californians to understand and track the amount of water they use and measure their progress toward their conservation goals.
3. By May 25, .2022, the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) shall consider adopting emergency regulations that include all of the following:
a. A requirement that each urban water supplier, as defined in section 10617 of the Water Code, shall submit to the Department of Water Resources a preliminary annual water supply and demand assessment consistent with section 10632.1 of the Water Code no later than June 1, 2022, and submit a final annual water 396
supply and demand assessment to the Department of Water Resources no later than the deadline set by section 10632.1 of the Water Code;
b. A requirement that each urban water supplier that has submitted a water shortage contingency plan to the
Department of Water Resources implement, at a minimum, the shortage response actions adopted under section 10632 of the Water Code for a shortage level of up to twenty percent (Level 2), by a date to be set by the Water Board; and
c. A requirement that each urban water supplier that has not submitted a water shortage contingency plan to the
Department of Water Resources implement, at a minimum,
shortage response actions established by the Water Board, which shall take into consideration model actions that the Department of Water Resources shall develop for urban water supplier water shortage contingency planning for Level 2, by a date to be set by the Water Board.
To further conserve water and improve drought resiliency if the drought lasts beyond this year, I encourage urban water suppliers to conserve more than required by the emergency regulations described in this paragraph and to voluntarily activate more stringent local requirements based on a shortage level of up to thirty percent (Level 3).
4. To promote water conservation, the Department of Water Resources shall consult with leaders in the commercial, industrial, and institutional sectors to develop strategies for improving water conservation, including direct technical assistance, financial assistance, and other approaches. By May 25, 2022, the Water Board shall consider adopting emergency regulations defining "non-functional turf" (that is, a definition of turf that is ornamental and not otherwise used for human recreation purposes such as school fields, sports fields, and parks) and banning irrigation of non-functional turf in the commercial, industrial, and institutional sectors except as it may be required to ensure the health of trees and other perennial non-turf plantings.
5. In order to maximize the efficient use of water and to preserve water supplies critical to human health and safety and the environment, Public Resources Code, Division 13 (commencing with section 21000) and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division are hereby suspended, with respect to the directives in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Order and any other projects and activities for the purpose of water conservation to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought, and any permits necessary to carry out such projects or activities. Entities that desire to conduct activities under this suspension, other than the directives in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Order, shall first request that the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency make a determination that the proposed activities are eligible to be conducted under this suspension. The Secretary shall use sound discretion in applying this Executive Order to ensure that the suspension serves the purpose of accelerating conservation projects that are necessary to address impacts of the drought, while at the same time 397
protecting public health and the environment. The entities implementing these directives or conducting activities under this suspension shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals for which these provisions are suspended.
6. To support voluntary approaches to improve fish habitat that would require change petitions under Water Code section 1707 and either Water Code sections 1425 through 1432 or Water Code sections 1725 through 1732, and where the primary purpose is to improve conditions for fish, the Water Board shall expeditiously consider petitions that add a fish and wildlife beneficial use or point of diversion and place of storage to improve conditions for anadromous fish. California Code of Regulations, title 23, section 1064, subdivisions ( a) ( 1) (A) (i)-(ii) are suspended with respect to any petition that is subject to this paragraph.
7. To facilitate the hauling of water for domestic use by local communities and domestic water users threatened with the loss of water supply or degraded water quality resulting from drought, any ordinance, regulation, prohibition, policy, or requirement of any kind adopted by a public agency that prohibits the hauling of water out of the water's basin of origin or a public agency's jurisdiction is hereby suspended. The suspension authorized pursuant to this paragraph shall be limited to the hauling of water by truck or bottle to be used for human consumption, cooking, or sanitation in communities or residences threatened with the loss of affordable safe drinking water.
Nothing in this paragraph limits any public health or safety requirement to ensure the safety of hauled water.
8. The Water Board shall expand inspections to determine whether illegal diversions or wasteful or unreasonable use of water are occurring and bring enforcement actions against illegal diverters and those engaging in the wasteful and unreasonable use of water. When access is not granted by a property owner, the Water Board may obtain an inspection warrant pursuant to the procedures set forth in Title 13 (commencing with section 1822.50) of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure for the purposes of conducting an inspection pursuant to this directive.
9. To protect health, safety, and the environment during this drought emergency, a county, city, or other public agency shall not:
a. Approve a permit for a new groundwater well or for alteration of an existing well in a basin subject to the Sustainable
Groundwater Management Act and classified as medium- or high-priority without first obtaining written verification from a Groundwater Sustainability Agency managing the basin or area of the basin where the well is proposed to be located that groundwater extraction by the proposed well would not be inconsistent with any sustainable groundwater management program established in any applicable Groundwater
Sustainability Plan adopted by that Groundwater Sustainability 398
Agency and would not decrease the likelihood of achieving a sustainability goal for the basin covered by such a plan; or b. Issue a permit for a new groundwater well or for alteration of an existing well without first determining that extraction of groundwater from the proposed well is (1) not likely to interfere with the production and functioning of existing nearby wells, and (2) not likely to cause subsidence that would adversely impact or damage nearby infrastructure.
This paragraph shall not apply to permits for wells that will provide less than two acre-feet per year of groundwater for individual domestic users, or that will exclusively provide groundwater to public water supply systems as defined in section 116275 of the Health and Safety Code.
10. To address household or small community drinking water shortages dependent upon groundwater wells that have failed due to drought conditions, the Department of Water Resources shall work with other state agencies to investigate expedited regulatory pathways to modify, repair, or reconstruct failed household or small community or public supply wells, while recognizing the need to ensure the sustainability of such wells as provided for in paragraph 9.
11. State agencies shall collaborate with tribes and federal, regional, and local agencies on actions related to promoting groundwater recharge and increasing storage.
12. To help advance groundwater recharge projects, and to demonstrate the feasibility of projects that can use available high water flows to recharge local groundwater while minimizing flood risks, the Water Board and Regional Water Quality Control Boards shall prioritize water right permits, water quality certifications, waste discharge requirements, and conditional waivers of waste discharge requirements to accelerate approvals for projects that enhance the ability of a local or state agency to capture high precipitation events for local storage or recharge, consistent with water right priorities and protections for fish and wildlife. For the purposes of carrying out this paragraph, Division 13 (commencing with section 21000) of the Public Resources Code and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division, and Chapter 3 ( commencing with section 85225) of Part 3 of Division 35 of the Water Code and regulations adopted pursuant thereto are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought. This suspension applies to (a) any actions taken by state agencies, (b) any actions taken by local agencies where the state agency with primary responsibility for the implementation of the directives concurs that local action is required, and (c) permits necessary to carry out actions under (a) or (b). The entities implementing these directives shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals for which these provisions are suspended.
13. With respect to recharge projects under either Flood-Managed Aquifer Recharge or the Department of Water Resources Sustainable 399
Groundwater Management Grant Program occurring on open and working lands to replenish and store water in groundwater basins that will help mitigate groundwater conditions impacted by drought, for any (a) actions taken by state agencies, (b) actions taken by a local agency where the Department of Water Resources concurs that local action is required, and (c) permits necessary to carry out actions under (a) or (b), Public Resources Code, Division 13 (commencing with section 21000) and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to address the impacts of the drought. The entities implementing these directives shall maintain on their websites a list of all activities or approvals for which these provisions are suspended.
14. To increase resilience of.state water supplies during prolonged drought conditions, the Department of Water Resources shall prepare for the potential creation and implementation of a multi-year transfer program pilot project for the purpose of acquiring water from willing partners and storing and conveying water to areas of need.
15. By April 15, 2022, state agencies shall submit to the Department of Finance for my consideration proposals to mitigate the worsening effects of severe drought, including emergency assistance to communities and households and others facing water shortages as a result of the drought, facilitation of groundwater recharge and wastewater recycling, improvements in water use efficiency, protection of fish and wildlife, mitigation of drought-related economic or water-supply disruption, and other potential investments to support short- and long-term drought response.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as soon as hereafter possible, this Order be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State and that widespread publicity and notice be given of this Order.
This Order is not intended to, and does not, create any rights or benefits, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against the State of California, its agencies, departments, entities, officers, employees, or any other person.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set
my hand and caused the Great Seal of the
State of California to be affixed this 28th
day of March 2022.
I I
,:, .
l · I'
t (.1 I
l~~-~-- GAVIN NEWSOM
Governor of California
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY N. WEBER, PH.D.
Secretary of State
400
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION 9305
DECLARING A WATER SHORTAGE EMERGENCY CONDITION AND IMPLEMENTING AN
EMERGENCY WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM IN PORTIONS OF ITS SERVICE AREA WHEREAS, Severe Drought Conditions Are Constraining Available Water Supplies from Northern California.
Beginning in water year 2020 (October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020), the watersheds supplying the California State Water Project (SWP) received below-average precipitation. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) classified water years 2020 and 2021 as dry and critically dry, respectively. Persistent dry conditions will likely result in a critically dry designation for water year 2022.
The three-year sequence of water years 2020 - 2022 (October 1, 2019, through September 30, 2022) is projected to be the driest on record in California for statewide precipitation. Precipitation in Northern California during the three months from January through March 2022 was the driest on record for that region.
In addition to reduced precipitation since 2020, California’s climate is transitioning to a warmer setting in which historical relationships among temperature, precipitation, and runoff are changing. In 2021, the DWR’s snowmelt runoff forecast over-estimated the runoff that occurred by 68 percent. In 2022, DWR’s median runoff forecast for the Sacramento River dropped from 16.7 to 9.7 million acre-feet, a reduction of 42 percent.
WHEREAS, Governor Newsom Has Declared a State of Emergency to Exist in All California Counties Due to These Severe Drought Conditions.
On October 19, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency to exist in all California counties due to worsening drought conditions. This proclamation follows other increasingly expansive drought declarations and executive orders that have been issued since April 2021.
At that time, Governor Newsom called on Californians to re-double their efforts to reduce water use by 15 percent and for local and regional water agencies to implement their Water Shortage Contingency Plans (WSCPs) “at a level appropriate to local conditions that takes into account the possibility of a third consecutive dry year.”
WHEREAS, Governor Newsom Has Issued an Executive Order Calling on Urban Water Suppliers to Activate Their Water Shortage Contingency Plans.
As part of their Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs), local and regional water providers are required to prepare and adopt WSCPs. These plans identify voluntary and mandatory response actions that will be taken under various water shortage conditions. These actions may include mandatory conservation activities to reduce water use by 10 to 50 percent, depending on the severity of the shortage.
Due to worsening drought conditions, including a record-breaking dry period in January and February, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-7-22 on March 28, 2022, specifically requiring all urban water suppliers to implement, at a minimum, the response actions identified in their WSCPs for a shortage level of up to 20 percent (Level 2).
This executive order further encouraged urban water suppliers to conserve more than the minimum required and to voluntarily activate more stringent local requirements based on a shortage level of up to 30 percent (Level 3).
1 401
WHEREAS, Metropolitan’s State Water Project Supplies Have Been and Are Being Curtailed.
On March 18, 2022, DWR reduced the SWP Table A allocation for 2022 from 15 to only five percent of contract amounts. Table A allocations for 2020 and 2021 were 20 and five percent, respectively. The last three years marks the lowest three-year combined deliveries of allocated water in the history of the SWP.
Three consecutive years of low Table A allocations have strained water supplies for portions of Metropolitan’s service area that currently are served primarily through the SWP. Referred to as the “SWP Dependent Area,” this area has limited or no access to Colorado River Supplies.
As a result, there will be insufficient SWP supplies this year to meet the minimum human health and safety (HH&S) needs in the SWP Dependent Area. HH&S needs are defined as “the amount of water necessary for prevention of adverse impacts to human health and safety, for which there is no feasible alternative supply.” In general, HH&S needs are limited to domestic supply, sanitation, public health and fire protection purposes, and cannot exceed 55 gallons per person per day.
To supplement the low Table A allocation, DWR has agreed to provide additional SWP supplies to SWP contractors if necessary to fulfill their unmet HH&S needs. However, DWR is requiring any SWP contractor receiving such supplies to impose mandatory restrictions on water use within its service area consistent with these emergency circumstances. DWR also is requiring any SWP water accessed for HH&S purposes be returned to the state within five years or as wetter conditions return.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan’s SWP Supplies Are Essential to Meet the Total Demands of Its Member Agencies.
Over the past 20 years, the SWP has provided about 30 percent of the region’s total water needs and a portion of the supply delivered to each of Metropolitan’s 26 Member Agencies.
Diamond Valley Lake, Metropolitan’s largest surface water reservoir and source of dry-year and emergency water supplies, has only been replenished with SWP supplies since the discovery of Quagga mussels in Colorado River water in Jan. 2007.
Under a five percent Table A allocation, Metropolitan cannot meet normal demands in the SWP Dependent Area, serve SWP supplies to other Member Agencies, or replenish storage in Diamond Valley Lake.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan, Its Member Agencies, and Others in the Region Have Taken Extraordinary Steps to Reduce Demands and Bolster Supplies.
In conjunction with its Member Agencies, counties, cities, and wholesale and retail water suppliers, Metropolitan decreased potable water demands within the service area by 40 percent, roughly 80 gallons per person per day, since 1990.
Metropolitan has invested $1.5 billion in conservation, local water recycling, and local groundwater recovery since 1990, resulting in a cumulative savings of nearly 7.6 million acre-feet.
Metropolitan has invested more than $3 billion in increasing storage capacity with Diamond Valley Lake and conveyance capacity with the Inland Feeder to capture SWP supply when available for later use in dry years.
Local water suppliers and communities have also made multi-billion-dollar strategic and forward-looking investments in water conservation (within and outside the MWD service area), water recycling, stormwater capture and reuse, groundwater storage, seawater desalination and other strategies to improve drought resilience.
Water conserved throughout the service area, among other things, has helped preserve storage in Metropolitan’s diverse storage portfolio during these dry conditions.
Continued action by Southern California residents to conserve water and extend local groundwater and surface water supplies will provide greater resilience if the drought continues in future years. 2 402
Metropolitan established the Member Agency Administered Program (MAAP) to assist Member Agencies in implementing local conservation activities. A portion of the funded projects can be used when water savings are not readily quantifiable, such as drought messaging and local water-use related code enforcement programs.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan and Its Member Agencies Have Taken Specific Actions to Preserve SWP Supplies.
Metropolitan and its Member Agencies have invested billions of dollars to preserve and enhance the availability and utilization of local supplies and, in turn, to decrease the overall use of Metropolitan’s imported supplies.
Metropolitan has established water management programs to increase Member Agency flexibility to shift from or temporarily defer taking Metropolitan’s supply from the SWP.
In 2021 and 2022, Metropolitan made targeted investments in its delivery system to reduce Member Agency dependency on SWP supplies. These investments have significantly improved operational flexibility, allowing delivery of water from either of Metropolitan’s two imported supply sources to most of the service area.
Metropolitan’s Member Agencies have, where feasible, operated their systems to reduce dependency on Metropolitan’s supply delivered through service connections fed from the SWP system.
On August 17, 2021, Metropolitan’s Board adopted a resolution declaring a “Condition 2 – Water Supply Alert” to preserve Metropolitan’s supply for the region.
On November 9, 2021, Metropolitan’s Board adopted a resolution recognizing the statewide drought emergency, declaring specified emergency conditions to exist within portions of its service area, and calling on Member Agencies to take various actions to preserve Metropolitan’s supply from the SWP. Among other things, Member Agencies were urged to make all reasonably practicable changes in their operations and to implement mandatory conservation and efficiency measures to reduce the use of SWP supplies.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan Has Determined that It Must Take Additional Actions Immediately to Conserve the Remaining Available SWP Supplies.
In December 2014, Metropolitan’s Board adopted a revised Water Supply Allocation Plan (WSAP) pursuant to which it may determine that a regional shortage exists, establish a regional shortage level, and impose an Allocation Surcharge on Member Agencies for water use above a predetermined allotment. The WSAP was designed and intended only for use during periods of regionwide water shortages and requires a more extended period to implement. As such, the current WSAP cannot effectively or efficiently address the water shortages anticipated to occur this year in the SWP Dependent Area.
Likewise, while actions being taken pursuant to the November 9, 2021, Board resolution are helpful, they are not sufficient to address in a timely manner the urgent circumstances present in the SWP Dependent Area.
That resolution specifically noted that if drought conditions persisted or worsened, Metropolitan’s Board would consider declaring a Water Shortage Emergency Condition and imposing appropriate regulations, restrictions and penalties to conserve Metropolitan’s water supplies.
Unfortunately, drought conditions have persisted, and the water supply outlook has worsened, particularly with respect to SWP supplies. Accordingly, Metropolitan believes it is necessary, desirable, and in the best interests of Metropolitan and its Member Agencies to declare that a Water Shortage Emergency Condition exists in the SWP Dependent Area, to adopt the framework for an Emergency Water Conservation Program encompassing the SWP Dependent Area, and to take certain other actions as set forth below and described in Board Letter 7-1 dated April 26, 2022, so as to reduce water use and preserve remaining SWP supplies.
Adopting an Emergency Water Conservation Program is consistent with actions taken by our Member Agencies and other retail agencies and will assist Metropolitan and its Member Agencies in public outreach efforts to communicate the severity of the current drought and the need for conservation and collective action. 3 403
Metropolitan further believes that it is necessary, desirable, and in the best interest of Metropolitan to work closely with Member Agencies to identify near-term actions to address this drought emergency and to grant the General Manager certain additional powers and authorities to assist in carrying out such activities promptly.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan Is Authorized and Required to Take These Additional Actions.
Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution requires all water resources in the state to be put to beneficial use and prohibits the waste or unreasonable use of such resources. What constitutes reasonable use is dependent on exigent circumstances, and may change during periods of drought.
Water Code Section 350 et seq. requires the distributor of a public water supply to declare that a water shortage emergency condition exists “whenever it finds and determines that the ordinary demands and requirements of water consumers cannot be satisfied without depleting the water supply needed for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection.” Upon making such a declaration, the water supplier is authorized to adopt such regulations and restrictions as will, in its sound discretion, “conserve the water supply for the greatest public benefit with particular regard to domestic use, sanitation, and fire protection.” Water Code Section 375 et seq. authorizes retail and wholesale water providers to adopt water and enforce conservation programs, which may include specific water-use limitations. Water providers may impose civil and criminal penalties for violating the requirements of such programs and/or may enforce water-use limitations by imposing “a volumetric penalty in an amount established by the public entity.” Water Code Section 10620 et seq. requires every urban water supplier to prepare and adopt an UWMP, which must include a WSCP to be implemented during times of shortage. Governor Newsom has directed all urban water suppliers to implement, at a minimum, the response actions identified in their WSCPs for a shortage level of up to 20 percent (Level 2).
DWR is requiring any SWP contractor receiving HH&S supplies to impose mandatory restrictions on water use within its service area consistent with these emergency circumstances.
The Metropolitan District Act and Metropolitan’s Administrative Code authorize and support taking specific actions to address the current drought emergency. In particular, Administrative Code Section 4512 provides that deliveries of water “shall be subject to operational, supply or demand conditions, as determined by the General Manager.”
WHEREAS, Metropolitan Held a Noticed Public Hearing to Receive Input on These Additional Actions.
On April 26, 2022, a public hearing was held to receive input, comments, and/or protests on the proposed declaration of a Water Shortage Emergency Condition and adoption of the framework of an Emergency Water Conservation Program for the SWP Dependent Area, as well as the other actions set forth below and described in Board Letter 7-1 dated April 26, 2022. A copy of Board Letter 7-1 was posted on Metropolitan’s website (https://mwdh2o.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx) and was available for review prior to the hearing.
Notice of this hearing was published on April 14, 2022, in six different newspapers of general circulation encompassing all six counties within Metropolitan’s service area: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles County), Orange County Register (Orange County), Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (San Bernardino County), Ventura County Star (Ventura County), Press Enterprise (Riverside County), and San Diego Union Tribune (San Diego County).
At this public hearing, Metropolitan’s Board received information, comments, testimony, and other evidence provided by Board members, Member Agency representatives, staff, and the public pertaining to these matters, and all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California hereby declares a Water Shortage Emergency Condition to exist in the SWP Dependent Area. Per this declaration, the Board calls on all Member Agencies to:
4 404
(1) Make all possible changes in their operations to reduce their use of Metropolitan’s SWP supplies. (2) Immediately mandate and implement such conservation requirements, water-use efficiency measures, and drought-related limitations consistent with their WSCPs and substantively conforming to the Emergency Water Conservation Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to finalize and implement an Emergency Water Conservation Program in the SWP Dependent Area, subject to the following conditions:
(1) The Emergency Water Conservation Program shall conform to the framework outlined in Board Letter 7-1, dated April 26, 2022. (A copy of this Board Letter may be accessed through Metropolitan’s website at https://mwdh2o.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx.) This framework includes volumetric penalties for non-compliance of up to $2,000 per acre-foot for use exceeding specified allocation limits.
(2) The Emergency Water Conservation Program shall include a provision for Member Agencies in the SWP Dependent Area to use 100 percent of their MAAP allocations for any conservation-related activities and projects, even where the water savings from such activities and projects are not readily quantifiable. Uses of MAAP funding could include drought-related actions, messaging, and code enforcement. Upon termination of the Emergency Water Conservation Program, the MAAP allocations would revert back to the previously established formula for non-documented water-saving program funding requests.
(3) The General Manager shall consult with all affected Member Agencies on the final terms of the Emergency Water Conservation Program.
(4) The General Manager shall finalize the Emergency Water Conservation Program within 30 days of Board adoption of this resolution.
(5) The Emergency Conservation Program shall continue through Jun. 30, 2023, unless otherwise terminated as described below.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is hereby directed to continue the actions and activities specified in August 17, 2021, and November 9, 2021, Board resolutions, except as expanded or limited herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby declares Metropolitan’s support for the Governor’s Executive Order N-7-22 and directs staff to work with the relevant state agencies to implement the Executive Order.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, should drought conditions persist in the coming months, or should demand management actions not sufficiently preserve available supplies, the General Manager may impose additional conditions or requirements as part of the Emergency Water Conservation Program described in Board Letter 7-1, which may include a prohibition on all outdoor uses of water or a requirement for affected Member Agencies to conform to specified volumetric limits.
5 405
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California at its meeting held on Apr. 26, 2022.
Secretary of the Board of Directors
of The Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California
6 406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
State of California
Office of Administrative Law
In re:
State Water Resources Control Board
NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EMERGENCY
REGULATORY ACTION
Regulatory Action:
Title 23, California Code of Regulations
Adopt sections: 996
Amend sections:
Repeal sections:
Government Code Sections 11346.1 and
11349.6
OAL Matter Number: 2022-0606-03
OAS Makter Type: Emergency (E)
This emergency action by the State Water Resources Control Board adopts a new regulation which .requires urban water suppliers to submit preliminary supply and demand assessments to the Department of Water Resources and to implement Level 2 demand reduction actions (actions intended to result in a 10 to 20 percent savings).
The regulation bans the irrigation of non-functional turf with potable water in commercial, industrial, and institutional. sectors and establishes that such irrigation is an infraction punishable by a fine of up to five hundred dollars for each day in which. the violation occurs pursuant to Water Code section 1058.5(d).
OAL approves this emergency regulatory action pursuant to sections 11346.1 and 11349.6 of the Government Gode. Pursuant to Water Code section 1058.5(b}, the Finding of Emergency in this matter was exempt from Office of Administrative Law Review.
This emergency regulatory action is effective on 6/10/2022 and, pursuant to Water Cade section 1058.5(c), will expire on 6/1 Q/2023. The Certificate of Compliance far this action is due no later than 6/9/2023.
Date: June 10, 2022 ~ ~~„~, ~~-,
Dale Mentink`
Assistant Chief Counsel
For: Kenneth J. Pogue
Director
Original: Eileen Sobeck, Executive
Director
Copy: Garrett Lenahan
417
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—OPfICEOFADMINiSTRA E~nw
NOTICE PUBLIC/~TIOIV For use by Secretary of State only ~n,
sr~.aootRev.ionor9l ~
~f1L FILE N07ICE FILE NUMBER REGULATORY ACTION NUMBEgR~ g~ ~g EMER~GEi NyC~Y NUMBER N1Jt~/I$~f~'a" ~~ e~
For use by Once of Administrative law (OAL)
~X ~ ~d ~ S7 ll ~ '~ ~ r ,~ ~ ~~~li~ ~~i" °• _ «<-~ only ~,'.;?~ bffi~e c u ~ ~.e~ ,'~;1 ~,° ~;,;. _ ~(fhv S~.~ of ~~~nmi~
~~~~ s~,~, jm~ rti r ~a-s~
NOTICE REGULATIONS
AGENCY WITH RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
State Water AGENCY FILE NUMBER (if any) Resources Control Board A. PUBLICATION OF NOTICE (Complete for publication in Notice Register)
1. SUBJECT OF NOTICE TITLES) FIRST SECTION AFFECTED 2. REQUESTED PUBLICATION DATE
3. NOTICE TYPE - 4. AGENCY CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER (Optional) ❑ Notice re Proposed ("—►
Re ulato tither `Action L_~
OAL USE ACTION ON PRppgSFD NOTICE
~~~Y HPP~oveaas
NOTICE. R_FGISTER NUMBER '. Pl!BUCATlpN bATE APp~cvyas t" DisapProvh~+~ S~bnnroea ~ MorliheU ~ Witharawn B. SUBMISSION OF REGULATIONS (Complete when submitting regulations) 1a. SUBJECT OF REGULATION{S) ib. ALL PREVIOUS RELATED OAL REGULATORY ACTION NUMBERS) Water Demand Reduction Emergency Regulation
2. SPECIFY CALIFORNIA CODE Of REGULATIONS TITLES) AND SECTIONS) (including title 26, if toxics related) SECTIONS} AFFECTED A°oPT
{List all section number{s) 996
`individually. Attach aMeNo
_~cidi~a~al:_sF~eeh_6f~reeded.} __~_._ _--- ____ _._ ----_ ____ -- TITLE(S) REPEAL 23 3. TYPE OF FILING
Code
Regular
§11346)
Rulemaking {Gov. ❑Certificate of Compliance: The agency officer named ~ Emergency Readopt ~ Changes Without below certifies that this agency complied with the (Gov. Code, §11346.1 (h}) Regulatory Effect {CaL Resubmittal of disapproved provisions of Gov. Code §§11346.2-11347.3 either Code Regs., title 1, §100} or withdrawn nonemergency before the emergency regulation was adopted or filing (Gov. Code §§11349.3, within the time period required by statute. 11349.4) ❑File &Print ~ Print Oniy
§11346.1(b))
Emergency (Gov. Code, ~
emergency
Resubmittal
filing
of disapproved
(Gov. Code,
or
§11346.1)
withdrawn o ocher {sPe~~~> Wafer Code Section 1058.5
4. ALL BEGINNING AND ENDING DATES OF AVAILABILITY OF MODIFIED REGULATIONS AND/OR MATERIAL ADDED TO THE RULEMAKING FILE (Cal. Code Regs. line 1, §44 and Gov. Code §11347.1)
5. EFFECTIVE DATE OF CHANGES (Gov. Code, §§ 11343.4, 11346.1(d}; Cai. Code Regs., title 1, §100 ) Effective January 1, April 1, July 1, or x Effective on filing with §100 Changes Without Effective other October 1 (Gov. Code §11343.4(a)) ❑Secretary of State ❑Regulatory Effect ❑(Specify)
6. CHECK IF THESE REGULATIONS REQUIRE NOTICE T0, OR REVIEW, CONSULTATION, APPROVAL OR CONCURRENCE BY, ANOTHER AGENCY OR ENTITY Department of Fnance (Form STD. 399) {SAM §6660) ~ Fair Political Practices Commission ~ State Fire Marshal Other {Specify)
7. CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER {Optional) E-MAIL ADdRESS (Optional) Garrett Lenahan 916 341-5179
8. (certify
of the regulation{s)
that the attached
identified
copy
on
of the regulations) is a true and correct copy For use by Office of Administrative Law (OAL) only this form, that the information specified on this form is true and correct, and #hat I am the head of the agency taking this action, or a designee of the head of the agency, and am authori2ed to make this certification.
SIGNATURE OF AGENCY HEAD OR DESIGNEE PATE
Eric Oppenheimer °'g J.~te:20]IA6➢614:24:44 7a1ySgnedbyEncOp°~ibe -0]'00'1nef 6/612022
TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNATORY
Eric Oppenheimer, Chief Deputy Director, State Water Resources Control Board 418
ADOPTED EMERGENCY REGULATION TEXT
Title 23. Waters
Division 3. State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Quality Control Boards
Chapter 3.5. Urban Water Use Efficiency and Conservation Article. 2. Prevention of Drought Wasteful Water Uses
996. Urban Drought Response Actions
~a) As used in this section:
(1) "Commercial, industrial and institutionaP' refers to commercial water users, industrial water users, and .institutional water users as respectively defined in Water Code, section 10608:12. subdivisions (e), {i ,and (j), and includes homeowners' associations, common interest developments, community service organizations, and other similar entities but does not include the residences of these entities' members or separate interests. ~2) "Common interest development' has the same meaning as in section 4100 of the Civil Code.
~3) "Community service organization or similar entity" has the same meaning as in :section 4110 of the Civi( Code.
~4) "Homeowners' association" means an "association" as defined in section 4080 of the Civil Code.
(5} "Non-functional turf" means turf that is solely ornamental and not rec~ularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events. Non-functional turf does not include sports fields and turF that is regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events.
(6} "Plant factor" has the same meaninct as in section 491. ~7) "Separate interest" has the same meaning as in section 4185 of the Civil Code. (8) "Turf" has the same meaning as in section 491.
(9} "Urban water supplier" has the same meaning as Water Code section 10617. (10) "Water shortage contingenc rLplan" means the plan required by Water Cade section 10632.
(b) Each urban water supplier shall submit to the Department of Water Resources a preliminary annual water su~ply and demand assessment consistent with section 10632.1 419
of the Water Cade no later than June 1 2022 or the effective date of this section whichever comes later, and submit a final annual water supply and demand assessment to the Department of Water Resources no later than the deadline set by section 10632.1 of the Water Code.
(i) The supplier's annual water supply and demand assessment submitted to the Department of Water`Resources demonstrates an ability to maintain reliable suppix until September 30, 2023.
Department of Water Resources.
(iii) The supplier's average number of gallons of water used per person per day by to twenty (20) gercent (Level ~, implement at a minimum the following actions:
(1) Initiate a public information and outreach campaign for water conservation and promptly and effectively reach the supplier's customers, using efforts such as ema papermail, bill inserts, customer app notifications, news articles, websites, comma events radio and television billboards and social media. potable water befinreen the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
Level 2~
(2 Notwithstanding subdivision (c)(1), urban water suppliers shall not be required to implement new residential connection moratoria pursuant to this section. residential customers for the year 2020 is below 55 gallons, as reported to the Board in the :Electronic Annual Report.
420
has authority to enforce, as infractions, the prohibitions in section 995 and takes enforcement against violations.
(e) t1) To prevent the unreasonable use of water and to promote water conservation, the use: of potable water is prohibited for the irrigation of non-functional turf at commercial, industrial and institutional sites.
(2~ Notwithstanding subdivision (e)(1~, the use of water is not prohibited by this section to the extent necessary to ensure the health of trees and other perennial non-turf plantings or to the extent necessary to address an immediate health and safety need. (3) Notwithstanding subdivision (e)(1 ~, an urban water supplier may approve a request for continued irrigation of non-functional turFwhere the user certifies that the turf is a low water use plant with a plant factor of 0.3 or less, and demonstrates the actual use is less than 40% of reference evapotranspiration.
criminal
(g) A decision or order issued under this section ~ the Board, or an officer or employee the Board, is subject to reconsideration under article 2 (commencing with section 1122) c chapter 4 of part 1 of division 2 of the Water Code.
Authority: Section 105$.5, Water Code.
References: Article X Section 2 California Constitution' Sections 4080 4100 4110 and 4185 Civil Gode~ Section 8627.7 Government Code' Sections 102 104 105 275 350
3.77, 491, 1058.5, 1122. 10608.12, 10617, 10632, and 10632.1, Water Code; Lic~hf v. Sf~ Water Resources Control Board (2Q14) 226 Cal.App.4th 1463; Stanford Vina Ranch lrrigation Co. v. State of California (20201 50 Cal.App.5th 976 421
Ordinance Amending Chapter 22, Article VIII of
the Oxnard City Code Regarding Water Waste
City Council
November 1, 2022
Stephen Fischer
City Attorney
422
That the City Council introduce for first reading by title only and adopt an Ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 36937, amending certain sections of Article VIII of Chapter 22 of the Oxnard City Code and implementing water conservation measures that is entitled: “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING CHAPTER 22, ARTICLE VIII
OF THE OXNARD CITY CODE TO COMPLY WITH AND
ENFORCE EMERGENCY DROUGHT-RELATED WATER USE
RESTRICTIONS”.
RECOMMENDATION 2
423
• March 18, 2022: Department of Water Resource (DWR)
announced that State Water Project (SWP) allocations would be 5%, down from 15% the previous year
• March 28, 2022: Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-7-22 in response to the historic drought conditions
• April 26, 2022: Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) adopted a framework for an Emergency
Water Conservation Program (EWCP)
• May 17, 2022: City Council proclaimed in Resolution No. 15,569 the existence of a local emergency due to water shortage conditions and adopted new mandatory water conservation measures
BACKGROUND 3
424
• June 23, 2022: City issued Director Order 20-03 establishing a 10 minute per day per station irrigation limit with the exception of the hand watering of food plants outside of the designated watering period with use of a container or hose with a shut off nozzle in line with MWD’s EWCP
• Efficient enforcement of water conservation measures require amending certain sections in article VIII of Chapter 22 of the Oxnard City Code (OCC)
• The Ordinance provides for new water conservation measures and enforcement procedures, keeping the City in compliance with state and local mandates and helping reduce water use BACKGROUND 4
425
• The Water Waste Ordinance:
• Amends certain sections in Article VIII of Chapter 22 in the OCC.
First, the Ordinance creates a new Section 22-137 entitled “Water Waste Prohibited - Emergency Provisions”
• Updates the City’s Water Waste code by implementing emergency water conservation measures that apply only when the City Council or the Director of Emergency Services declares a drought emergency in the City
• Updates the enforcement mechanism for water waste violators, by issuing administrative citations for violations of permanent and emergency water conservation measures
• Allows for the hand watering of trees, food plants or other perennials with a container (e.g. bucket or watering can) or a hose fitted with a shut-off nozzle
DISCUSSION 5
426
• The Water Waste Ordinance:
• Updates the Water Waste Code to be in conformity with Oxnard’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP)
• Amends certain sections in Article VIII of Chapter 22 in the OCC.
First, the Ordinance creates a new Section 22-137 entitled “Water Waste Prohibited - Emergency Provisions”
• Shall only be in effect when the City Council or Director of Emergency Services proclaim a drought emergency
DISCUSSION 6
427
• The financial impact of adopting this ordinance is unknown • City staff, particularly code compliance officers and water utility staff, will spend additional time investigating water waste violations, issuing water waste citations, and participating in the review hearing process
FINANCIAL IMPACT 7
428
QUESTIONS
8 429
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.5
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Michael Wolfe, Public Works Director, (805) 385-8055, [email protected] SUBJECT: Recommended Speed Limits-2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey Results and Amending Section 8-2 of Article I of Chapter 8 of the Oxnard City Code. (15 minutes)
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Receive and comment on the 2022 speed limit survey results on 49 streets (175 roadway segments) in the City of Oxnard; and
2. Approve introduction of the 2022 Speed Limit Ordinance for the first reading by title only waiving further reading of the ordinance amending Section 8-2 of Article I of Chapter 8 of the Oxnard City Code. (Public Works and Transportation Committee approved 2-0.) Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/70iF72zJL8
BACKGROUND
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and as recommended by the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), requires that speed limits be established based on an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS). However, per CVC Section 40802(c) the established speed limits may remain enforceable for a total of seven (7) years if the arresting officer has completed a radar operating course of not less than 24 hours. In addition, CVC Section 40802(c) states that the enforceable speed limits may be extended to 10 years if a registered engineer has reviewed the selected roadway segments and determined that no significant changes to the roadway or traffic conditions have occurred since the prior Engineering and Traffic Survey was approved.
A speed limit ordinance (Ordinance No. 2941) was enacted in May 2018 based on the speed surveys conducted in 2017 and 2018 by the City Consultant and Police staff. If an E&TS is not completed every five to ten years, it inhibits the City’s ability to effectively enforce and prosecute speeding violations. Radar enforcement is specifically prohibited on any street segment without a current E&TS.
CVC 627 defines the requirements of an E&TS:
The accident record for the surveyed street segments for the most recent three years; Highway, traffic, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver; Prevailing speeds of free-flowing traffic as determined by traffic engineering measurements or samplings; and Additional factors to consider: residential and business density and pedestrian and bicycle safety. 430
According to the 2019 Caltrans California Manual for Setting Speed Limits, speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile speed conform to the consensus of drivers of reasonable and prudent speed, rather than the judgment of one or few drivers. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who do not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.
When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest five-mph increment to the 85th percentile speed, rounding as standard mathematical rounding directs. However, under some circumstances, the posted speed limit may be reduced by five-mph from the 85th percentile speed. If a 5-mph reduction is justified, the E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The factors justifying such a reduction include the collision history, any unusual road characteristics, residential and business density, and pedestrian and bicycle safety in accordance with CVC 627.
CVC 21400 (b) allows for setting the speed limit at the five-mph increment below the 85th percentile even if mathematical rounding would require the speed to be posted above the 85th percentile. However, if this option is used, then the additional five-mph reduction mentioned above cannot be applied. In effect, this law allows an engineer to round down to the nearest increment of the 85th instead of up but does not allow the engineer to take a further reduction.
State Assembly Bill No. 43 became law on January 1, 2022, and following are some of the key elements of the bill:
This bill would authorize local authorities to consider the safety of vulnerable pedestrian groups, as specified. This bill would establish a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on state highways located in any business or residence district and would authorize the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to change the speed limit on any such highway, as prescribed, including erecting signs to give notice thereof. This bill would additionally authorize Caltrans and a local authority to declare a speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, as specified, on these highways.
The bill would, in some circumstances, authorize the reduction of a speed limit beginning June 30, 2024, or when the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating traffic infraction violations, whichever is sooner.
This bill would extend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted more than 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years.
DISCUSSION
The California Manual for Setting Speed Limits was utilized in this Study. It involves three major data collection and analysis categories: roadway characteristics, collision rate, and spot speed survey.
Streets are typically split into sections that have similar physical attributes. Please note that not all streets are required to have speed surveys done to determine the speed limit. Streets are selected City-wide that have non-statutory speed limits.
Typically, all arterials and collector streets are included in the speed survey. New street segments are added for the speed survey due to the change in the roadway segments and/or recommendations from the Police staff.
Also, State Assembly Bill No. 43 legislation was considered along with the recently completed traffic speed surveys and analysis of collision data and field conditions to set the speed limits that staff recommend for 175 road segments on 49 streets located citywide in Oxnard.
Roadway Characteristics
As a part of this Study, the following were recorded: roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, type of area adjoining the street (school zone, parks, residential, commercial, etc.), and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, bicycle lanes, sidewalks, etc.). The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine the recommended speed limits in accordance with CVC Section 627. The surveyed roadway characteristics are indicated for each road segment in the attached E&TS Summary (Exhibit A). 431
Collision Rate Analysis
The collision rate for the roadway sections was analyzed based on the most recent collision records from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) as required by CVC Section 627. Based on a review of the collision records from January 2017 to December 2019, mid-block collision rates were calculated for each street segment.
The results of the collision rate calculations, including the Average Expected Accident Rates for each type of roadway facility, are shown in the attached E&TS Summary (Exhibit A). The table below lists the Average Expected Accident Rates based on the latest average rate for each type of roadway in the City of Oxnard, derived from the 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans.
Table 1.
Roadway Type Average Expected Accident Rate
5-6 lanes divided (<45mph) 1.06
5-6 lanes divided (>=45mph) 1.00
5-6 lanes undivided (<45mph) 1.37
5-6 lanes undivided (>=45mph) 3.02
4 lanes divided (<45mph) 0.91
4 lanes divided (>=45mph) 0.90
4 lanes undivided (<45mph) 0.94
4 lanes undivided (>=45mph) 0.67
3 lanes 1.17
2 lanes (<45mph) 1.20
2 lanes (>=45mph) 0.82
The mid-block collision rate in terms of “collision per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel” for each street surveyed was calculated and the collision rates for each segment are shown in the attached E&TS Summary (Exhibit A).
Speed Survey
The E&TS and Spot Speed Survey (Engineering and Speed Survey) were conducted by the City’s on-call traffic engineering firm, LSY Enterprise, Inc., and under the supervision of a registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. Spot speed surveys were conducted at each roadway segment to establish a reasonable and prudent speed limit based on the premise that the established speed limit conforms to most motorists' actual behavior.
The summary of the Engineering and Traffic Survey data and analysis for each of the surveyed 175 roadway segments is provided in Exhibit A.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO SPEED LIMITS
The “existing speed vs. proposed speed limits” table provided in Exhibit A identifies the streets surveyed for this update and provides a comparison to current speed limits. Based on the E&TS study for the 175 roadway segments, staff recommend:
Decrease speed limit for 10 roadway segments,
Establish new speed limits for 3 roadway segments, and 432
Current speed limits be re-established for the remaining 162 roadway segments.
Table 2.
Decrease Speed Limit
Street From To Posted Speed Limit
(mph)
Recommended Speed
Limit (mph)
Del Norte
Blvd
Fifth St Camino Del Sol 50 45
Gonzales
Rd
Ventura Rd H St 45 40
Gonzales
Rd
H St Oxnard Blvd 45 40
Hemlock
St
Victoria Ave Patterson Rd 40 35
Lombard
St
Gonzales Rd 150 feet n/o of
Posada Dr
35 30
Oxnard
Blvd
Town Center Dr Wagon Wheel Rd 50 45
Oxnard
Blvd
Wagon Wheel Rd Vineyard Ave 50 45
Oxnard
Blvd
Rose Ave Channel Islands
Overcrossing
55 50
Oxnard
Blvd
Channel Islands
Overcrossing
Pleasant Valley Rd 60 55
Ventura
Blvd
Vineyard Ave Balboa St 40 35
Table 3.
Establish New Speed Limit
Street From To Posted Speed Limit
(mph)
Recommended Speed Limit
(mph)
Etting Rd Pleasant Valley
Rd
East City Limit N/A 30
Fifth St Rice Ave Del Norte Blvd N/A 55
Maulhardt
Rd
Dodge Rd Pleasant Valley
Rd
N/A 25
Provided there is an operative motion by Council on this Ordinance at the November 1, 2022 council meeting, this item will be brought to Council at the December 6, 2022 meeting for consideration by the Council for adoption of the Ordinance.
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
433
This agenda item supports the Infrastructure and Natural Resources strategy. The purpose of the Infrastructure and Natural Resources strategy is to preserve and improve our roads, utilities, parks, trees, water supply and natural resources through effective planning, prioritization, and an equitable and efficient use of available funding.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The estimated cost for changing and/or adding speed limit signs for the 13 roadway segments is $5,000, which includes the cost of new signs and staff time. Funds are available in the approved FY 2022-23 Adopted General Fund Budget of the Streets Division to sufficiently cover the estimated costs of the signs.
COMMITTEE OUTCOME
The Public Works and Transportation Committee approved 2-0 on October 11, 2022 to approve the staff recommendation and to forward the item for Council approval.
Prepared by: Tatiana Arnaout, City Engineer
ATTACHMENTS
1. Proposed 2022 Speed Limit Ordinance
2. Speed Limit Ordinance - 2941 (May 22, 2018)
3. Exhibit A 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey
4. Presentation
434
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD
ORDINANCE NO. ___
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OXNARD AMENDING SPEED LIMITS
WHEREAS, speed limits on streets that do not have statutory speed limits are required to be surveyed every 5 years by California Vehicle Code Sections 627 and 40802, with the ability to extend to 7 years and 10 years provided conditions have not changed significantly; and
WHEREAS, residential streets, commercial (downtown) districts, alleys and freeways have statutory speed limits; and
WHEREAS, the 85th-percentile speed, which is the speed at which 85% of vehicles during a survey travel, is what the City uses to establish speed limits on streets that do not have prima facie speed limits set by the Vehicle Code; and WHEREAS, City Consultant conducted Engineering and Traffic Surveys in June and July of 2022 to determine the 85th-percentile speed; and WHEREAS, several elements of State Assembly Bill 43 was used in determining the proposed changes to speed limits; and
WHEREAS, based on those speed surveys, City staff prepared recommendations for changes to existing speed limits; and WHEREAS, the Oxnard City Council now wishes to amend the speed limits in the City of Oxnard listed in Oxnard City Code Section 8-2.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Oxnard does ordain as follows:
Part 1: The chart in City Code Section 8-2 is hereby amended to read as follows
Street From To Speed Limit
(mph)
A Street First Street Robert Avenue 25
Auto Center Drive Rose Avenue Paseo Mercado 40
Paseo Mercado Santa Clara 40
Bard Road J Street Saviers Road 30
Saviers Road San Juan Avenue 35
San Juan Avenue Rose Avenue 35
435
Ordinance No. ______
Rose Avenue Pleasant Valley
Road
35 C Street Pleasant Valley
Road
Bard Road 25
Bard Road Channel Islands
Boulevard
25 Channel Islands
Boulevard
Elm Street 30
Elm Street Wooley Road 30
Wooley Road Second Street 30
Second Street Doris Avenue 30
Doris Avenue Glenwood Drive 30
Glenwood Drive Gonzales Road 30
Gonzales Road Citrus Grove Lane 30
Citrus Grove Lane C Street Oxnard Boulevard 30
Camino Del Sol Entrada Drive Rose Avenue 45
Rose Avenue Lombard Street 45
Lombard Street Rice Avenue 45
Rice Avenue Kinetic Drive 45
Kinetic Drive Del Norte
Boulevard
45 Channel Islands
Boulevard
Harbor Boulevard Victoria Avenue 45
Ventura Road J Street 35
J Street Saviers Road 35
Saviers Road Paula Street 35
Paula Street Oxnard Boulevard 40
Oxnard Boulevard Rice Avenue 40
Del Norte
Boulevard
Fifth Street Camino Del Sol 45
Camino Del Sol Lunar Court 50
Lunar Court Highway 101 50
Doris Avenue Patterson Road Ventura Road 45
Ventura Road F Street 25
E Street Wooley Road Fifth Street 25
Eastman Avenue Lombard Street Rice Avenue 40
Rose Avenue Lombard Street 40
Emerson Avenue Pacific Avenue Rose Avenue 40
Rose Avenue El Dorado Avenue 40
Etting Road Pleasant Valley
Road
East City Limits 30
Fifth Street Victoria Avenue Ventura Road 45
Ventura Road C Street 35
Oxnard Boulevard Rail Road Tracks 35
Rail Road Tracks Richmond Avenue 35
436
Ordinance No. ______
Richmond Avenue Rose Avenue 35
Rose Avenue Rice Avenue 55
Rice Avenue Del Norte
Boulevard
55 Gary Drive Albany Drive Rose Avenue 30
Gonzales Road Victoria Avenue Merion Way 45
Merion Way Patterson Road 45
Patterson Road Ventura Road 45
Ventura Road H Street 40
H Street Oxnard Boulevard 40
Oxnard Boulevard Snow Avenue 45
Snow Avenue Rose Avenue 45
Rose Avenue Lombard Street 45
Lombard Street Rice Avenue 45
Graves Avenue Celsius Avenue Latigo Avenue 40
Latigo Avenue Wankel Way 40
H Street Violet Way Vineyard Avenue 40
Vineyard Avenue Gonzales Road 40
Gonzales Road Doris Avenue 30
Doris Avenue Second Street 30
Second Street Fifth Street 30
Harbor Boulevard Bluefin Circle La Brea Street 40
La Brea Street Channel Islands
Boulevard
40 Channel Islands
Boulevard
Eastbourne Bay 50
Eastbourne Bay Wooley Road 50
Wooley Road Fifth Street 50
Harbor Boulevard
Frontage
Beach Way Wooley Road 15
Wooley Road Channel Way 15
Hemlock Street Victoria Avenue Patterson Road 35
Patterson Road Ventura Road 35
Hobson Way Ninth Street Fifth Street 30
Hueneme Road J Street Saviers Road 45
Saviers Road Edison Drive 45
J Street Hueneme Road Pleasant Valley
Road
30 Pleasant Valley
Road
Bard Road 30
Bard Road Teakwood Street 30
Teakwood Street Channel Islands
Boulevard
30 437
Ordinance No. ______
Channel Islands
Boulevard
Hill Street 30
Hill Street Ninth Street 30
Lockwood Street Rose Avenue Eastern Terminal 35
Lombard Street Gonzales Road 150' n/o Posada
Drive
30 Eastman Avenue Camino Del Sol 40
Mandalay Beach
Road
Beach Way Wooley Road 25
Wooley Road Fifth Street 25
Maulhardt Road Dodge Road Pleasant Valley
Road
25 Ninth Street Ventura Road Hobson Way 40
Olds Road Sanford Street Etting Road 25
Oxnard Boulevard Forest Park Blvd Town Center Drive 35
Town Center Drive Wagon Wheel
Road
45 Wagon Wheel Road Vineyard Avenue 45
Vineyard Avenue Gonzales Road 45
Gonzales Road Robert Avenue 45
Robert Avenue Second Street 35
Second Street Seventh Street 30
Seventh Street Wooley Road 30
Wooley Road Rail Road Tracks 40
Rail Road Tracks Rose Avenue 45
Rose Avenue Channel Islands
Overpass
50 Channel Islands
Overpass
Pleasant Valley
Road
55 Pacific Avenue Statham Boulevard Wooley Road 35
Wooley Road Fifth Street 35
Patterson Road Doris Avenue Gonzales Road 40
Gonzales Road Vineyard Avenue 40
Hemlock Street Wooley Road 45
Wooley Road Fifth Street 45
Peninsula Road South Terminal Channel Islands
Road
25 Perkins Road Hueneme Road Pleasant Valley
Road
25 Pleasant Valley
Road
J Street Saviers Road 35
Saviers Road Squires Drive 35
Squires Drive Rose Avenue 45
Rose Avenue Bard Road 45
Bard Road SR-1 45
Rice Avenue Fifth Street Camino Del Sol 50
438
Ordinance No. ______
Camino Del Sol Latigo Avenue 50
Latigo Avenue Gonzales Road 50
Gonzales Road 101 South Bound 50
101 South Bound City Limits 40
Rose Avenue Sanford Street Bard Road 45
Bard Road Channel Islands
Boulevard
45 Channel Islands
Boulevard
Emerson Avenue 45
Emerson Avenue Wooley Road 45
Wooley Road Fifth Street 45
Fifth Street Camino Del Sol 40
Camino Del Sol Gonzales Road 45
Gonzales Road Highway 101 40
Highway 101 Collins Street 40
Saviers Road Hueneme Road Pleasant Valley
Road
40 Pleasant Valley
Road
Bard Road 40
Bard Road Channel Islands
Boulevard
40 Channel Islands
Boulevard
Elm Street 40
Elm Street Wooley Road 40
Second Street Ventura Road H Street 35
Statham
Boulevard
Channel Islands
Boulevard
Oxnard Boulevard 40
Sturgis Road Lombard Street Elevar Street 40
Elevar Street Del Norte
Boulevard
40 Teal Club Road Victoria Avenue Patterson Road 35
Patterson Road Ventura Road 35
Third Street A Street Juanita Avenue 35
Juanita Avenue Rose Avenue 40
Ventura
Boulevard
Auto Center Drive Santa Clara
Avenue
35 Vineyard Avenue Balboa Street 35
Balboa Street Rose Avenue 40
Ventura Road Channel Islands
Boulevard
Hemlock Street 45
Hemlock Street Wooley Road 45
Wooley Road Fifth Street 45
Fifth Street Second Street 45
Second Street Doris Avenue 45
439
Ordinance No. ______
Doris Avenue Gonzales Road 45
Gonzales Road Vineyard Avenue 45
Vineyard Avenue RR Crossing 50
RR Crossing Town Center Drive 40
Victoria Avenue Santa Clara River
Bridge
Gonzales Road 55
Gonzales Road Doris Avenue 55
Doris Avenue Teal Club Road 55
Teal Club Road Fifth Street 55
Fifth Street Wooley Road 50
Wooley Road Hemlock Street 50
Hemlock Street Curlew Way 50
Curlew Way Lake Shore Drive 50
Vineyard Avenue City Limits Forest Park
Boulevard
45 Forest Park
Boulevard
Highway 101 35
Highway 101 Oxnard Boulevard 35
Oxnard Boulevard H Street 45
H Street Ventura Road 40
Ventura Road Patterson Road 40
Wooley Road Harbor Boulevard Tradewinds Drive 45
Tradewinds Drive Victoria Avenue 45
Victoria Avenue Patterson Road 45
Patterson Road Ventura Road 45
Ventura Road H Street 40
E Street Oxnard Boulevard 40
Oxnard Boulevard Richmond Avenue 40
Richmond Avenue Rose Avenue 40
Part 2: If for any reason this ordinance is held invalid or unenforceable, the City Council intends that the ordinance provisions which would have been repealed by this ordinance remain in effect as if this ordinance had not been adopted.
Part 3: If for any reason any part of this ordinance is held invalid or unenforceable, the Council intends that the remaining parts of this ordinance remain in effect.
Part 4: This ordinance shall be codified.
Part 5: Pursuant to Government Code section 36933(c)(1), the City Attorney was designated to prepare, and the City Clerk published, a summary of this 440
Ordinance No. ______
ordinance, and a certified copy of the ordinance was posted in the Office of the City Clerk a minimum of five days before the City Council’s adoption of the ordinance.
Part 6: The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the summary thereof to be published within 15 calendar days of the adoption and shall post a certified copy of this ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code section 36933. Ordinance No. ________ was first read on _______________, 2022, finally adopted on ______________, 2022, and will become effective 30 days after final adoption.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this ____ day of ______________, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
Existing Speed vs. Proposed Speed Limit
448
1 A Street First Robert Ave 25 25
2 Auto Center Dr Rose Ave Paseo Mercado 40 40
3 Auto Center Dr Paseo Mercado Santa Clara 40 40
4 Bard Rd J Street Saviers Rd 30 30
5 Bard Rd Saviers Rd San Juan Ave 35 35
6 Bard Rd San Juan Ave Rose Ave 35 35
7 Bard Rd Rose Ave Pleasant Valley Rd 35 35
8 C Street Pleasant Valley Rd Bard Rd 25 25
9 C Street Bard Rd Channel Islands 25 25
10 C Street Channel Islands Blvd Elm St 30 30
11 C Street Elm St Wooley Rd 30 30
12 C Street Wooley Rd Second St 30 30
13 C Street Second St Doris Ave 30 30
14 C Street Doris Ave Glenwood Dr 30 30
15 C Street Glenwood Dr Gonzales Rd 30 30
16 C Street Gonzales Rd Citrus Grove Ln 30 30
17 Citrus Grove Ln C Street Oxnard Blvd 30 30
18 Camino Del Sol Entrada Dr Rose Ave 45 45
19 Camino Del Sol Rose Ave Lombard St 45 45
20 Camino Del Sol Lombard St Rice Ave 45 45
21 Camino Del Sol Rice Ave Kinetic Dr 45 45
22 Camino Del Sol Kinetic Dr Del Norte Blvd 45 45
23 Channel Islands Bl Harbor Blvd Victoria Ave 45 45
24 Channel Islands Bl Ventura Rd J Street 35 35
25 Channel Islands Bl J Street Saviers Rd 35 35
26 Channel Islands Bl Saviers Rd Paula St 35 35
27 Channel Islands Bl Paula St Oxnard Blvd 40 40
28 Channel Islands Bl Oxnard Blvd Rice Ave 40 40
29 Del Norte Blvd Fifth St Camino Del Sol 50 45
30 Del Norte Blvd Camino Del Sol Lunar Ct 50 50
31 Del Norte Blvd Lunar Ct Highway 101 50 50
32 Doris Ave Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 45 45
33 Doris Ave Ventura Rd F Street 25 25
Existing vs. Proposed Speed Limit
Segment No. Street From To Posted Speed Limit (mph) Recommended Speed Limit (mph) 449
Existing vs. Proposed Speed Limit
Segment No. Street From To Posted Speed Limit (mph) Recommended Speed Limit (mph) 34 E Street Wooley Rd Fifth St 25 25
35 Eastman Ave Lombard St Rice Ave 40 40
36 Eastman Ave Rose Ave Lombard St 40 40
37 Emerson Ave Pacific Ave Rose Ave 40 40
38 Emerson Ave Rose Ave El Dorado Ave 40 40
39 Etting Rd Pleasant Valley Rd East City Limits None 30 40 Fifth Street Victoria Ave Ventura Rd 45 45
41 Fifth Street Ventura Rd C Street 35 35
42 Fifth Street Oxnard Blvd RR Tracks 35 35
43 Fifth Street RR Tracks Richmond Ave 35 35
44 Fifth Street Richmond Ave Rose Ave 35 35
45 Fifth Street Rose Ave Rice Ave 55 55
46 Fifth Street Rice Ave Del Norte Blvd None 55
47 Gary Dr Albany Dr Rose Ave 30 30
48 Gonzales Rd Victoria Ave Merion Way 45 45
49 Gonzales Rd Merion Way Patterson Rd 45 45
50 Gonzales Rd Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 45 45
51 Gonzales Rd Ventura Rd H Street 45 40
52 Gonzales Rd H Street Oxnard Blvd 45 40
53 Gonzales Rd Oxnard Blvd Snow Ave 45 45
54 Gonzales Rd Snow Ave Rose Ave 45 45
55 Gonzales Rd Rose Ave Lombard St 45 45
56 Gonzales Rd Lombard St Rice Ave 45 45
57 Graves Ave Celsius Ave Latigo Ave 40 40
58 Graves Ave Latigo Ave Wankel Way 40 40
59 H Street Violet Way Vineyard Ave 40 40
60 H Street Vineyard Ave Gonzales Rd 40 40
61 H Street Gonzales Rd Doris Ave 30 30
62 H Street Doris Ave Second St 30 30
63 H Street Second St Fifth St 30 30
64 Harbor Blvd Bluefin Cir La Brea St 40 40
65 Harbor Blvd La Brea St Channel Islands Blvd 40 40
66 Harbor Blvd Channel Islands Blvd Eastbourne Bay 50 50 450
Existing vs. Proposed Speed Limit
Segment No. Street From To Posted Speed Limit (mph) Recommended Speed Limit (mph) 67 Harbor Blvd Eastbourne Bay Wooley Rd 50 50
68 Harbor Blvd Wooley Rd Fifth St 50 50
69 Harbor Blvd Frontage Beach Way Wooley Rd 15 15
70 Harbor Blvd Frontage Wooley Rd Channel Way 15 15
71 Hemlock Street Victoria Ave Patterson Rd 40 35
72 Hemlock Street Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 35 35
73 Hobson Way Ninth St Fifth St 30 30
74 Hueneme Rd J Street Saviers Rd 45 45
75 Hueneme Rd Saviers Rd Edison Dr 45 45
76 J Street Hueneme Rd Pleasant Valley Rd 30 30
77 J Street Pleasant Valley Rd Bard Rd 30 30
78 J Street Bard Rd Teakwood St 30 30
79 J Street Teakwood St Channel Islands Blvd 30 30
80 J Street Channel Islands Blvd Hill St 30 30
81 J Street Hill St Ninth St 30 30
82 Lockwood St Rose Ave Eastern Terminal 35 35
83 Lombard St Gonzales Rd 150' n/o Posada Dr 35 30
84 Lombard St Eastman Ave Camino Del Sol 40 40
85 Mandalay Beach Rd Beach Way Wooley Rd 25 25
86 Mandalay Beach Rd Wooley Rd Fifth St 25 25
87 Maulhardt Rd Dodge Rd Pleasant Valley Rd None 25
88 Ninth St Ventura Rd Hobson Way 40 40
89 Olds Rd Sanford St Etting Rd 25 25
90 Oxnard Blvd Forest Park Blvd Town Center Drive 35 35 91 Oxnard Blvd Town Center Drive Wagon Wheel Rd 50 45
92 Oxnard Blvd Wagon Wheel Rd Vineyard Ave 50 45
93 Oxnard Blvd Vineyard Ave Gonzales Rd 45 45
94 Oxnard Blvd Gonzales Rd Robert Ave 45 45
95 Oxnard Blvd Robert Ave Second St 35 35
96 Oxnard Blvd Second St Seventh St 30 30
97 Oxnard Blvd Seventh St Wooley Rd 30 30
98 Oxnard Blvd Wooley Rd RR Tracks 40 40
99 Oxnard Blvd RR Tracks Rose Ave 45 45
451
Existing vs. Proposed Speed Limit
Segment No. Street From To Posted Speed Limit (mph) Recommended Speed Limit (mph) 100 Oxnard Blvd Rose Ave Channel Islands Overpass 55 50 101 Oxnard Blvd Channel Islands Overpass Pleasant Valley Rd 60 55 102 Pacific Ave Statham Blvd Wooley Rd 35 35
103 Pacific Ave Wooley Rd Fifth St 35 35
104 Patterson Rd Doris Ave Gonzales Rd 40 40
105 Patterson Rd Gonzales Rd Vineyard Ave 40 40
106 Patterson Rd Hemlock St Wooley Rd 45 45
107 Patterson Rd Wooley Rd Fifth St 45 45
108 Peninsula Rd So Terminal Channel Islands 25 25
109 Perkins Rd Hueneme Rd Pleasant Valley Rd 25 25
110 Pleasant Valley Rd J Street Saviers Rd 35 35
111 Pleasant Valley Rd Saviers Rd Squires Dr 35 35
112 Pleasant Valley Rd Squires Dr Rose Ave 45 45
113 Pleasant Valley Rd Rose Ave Bard Rd 45 45
114 Pleasant Valley Rd Bard Rd SR-1 45 45
115 Rice Ave Fifth St Camino Del Sol 50 50
116 Rice Ave Camino Del Sol Latigo Ave 50 50
117 Rice Ave Latigo Ave Gonzales Rd 50 50
118 Rice Ave Gonzales Rd 101 S/B 50 50
119 Rice Ave 101 S/B City Limits 40 40
120 Rose Ave Sanford St Bard Rd 45 45
121 Rose Ave Bard Rd Channel Islands Blvd 45 45
122 Rose Ave Channel Islands Blvd Emerson Ave 45 45
123 Rose Ave Emerson Ave Wooley Rd 45 45
124 Rose Ave Wooley Rd Fifth St 45 45
125 Rose Ave Fifth St Camino Del Sol 40 40
126 Rose Ave Camino Del Sol Gonzales Rd 45 45
127 Rose Ave Gonzales Rd Highway 101 40 40
128 Rose Ave Highway 101 Collins St 40 40
129 Saviers Rd Hueneme Rd Pleasant Valley Rd 40 40
130 Saviers Rd Pleasant Valley Rd Bard Rd 40 40
131 Saviers Rd Bard Rd Channel Islands Blvd 40 40
132 Saviers Rd Channel Islands Blvd Elm St 40 40
452
Existing vs. Proposed Speed Limit
Segment No. Street From To Posted Speed Limit (mph) Recommended Speed Limit (mph) 133 Saviers Rd Elm St Wooley Rd 40 40
134 Second St Ventura Rd H St 35 35
135 Statham Blvd Channel Islands Blvd Oxnard Blvd 40 40 136 Sturgis Rd Lombard St Elevard St 40 40
137 Sturgis Rd Elevard St Del Norte Blvd 40 40
138 Teal Club Rd Victoria Ave Patterson Rd 35 35
139 Teal Club Rd Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 35 35
140 Third Street A St Juanita Ave 35 35
141 Third Street Juanita Rose Ave 40 40
142 Ventura Blvd Auto Center Dr Santa Clara Ave 35 35
143 Ventura Blvd Vineyard Ave Balboa St 40 35
144 Ventura Blvd Balboa St Rose Ave 40 40
145 Ventura Rd Channel Islands Blvd Hemlock St 45 45
146 Ventura Rd Hemlock St Wooley Rd 45 45
147 Ventura Rd Wooley Rd Fifth St 45 45
148 Ventura Rd Fifth St Second St 45 45
149 Ventura Rd Second St Doris Ave 45 45
150 Ventura Rd Doris Ave Gonzales Rd 45 45
151 Ventura Rd Gonzales Rd Vineyard Ave 45 45
152 Ventura Rd Vineyard Ave RR Crossing 50 50
153 Ventura Rd RR Crossing Town Center Dr 40 40
154 Victoria Ave Santa Clara River Bridge Gonzales Rd 55 55 155 Victoria Ave Gonzales Rd Doris Ave 55 55
156 Victoria Ave Doris Ave Teal Club Rd 55 55
157 Victoria Ave Teal Club Rd Fifth St 55 55
158 Victoria Ave Fifth St Wooley Rd 50 50
159 Victoria Ave Wooley Rd Hemlock St 50 50
160 Victoria Ave Hemlock St Curlew Way 50 50
161 Victoria Ave Curlew Way Lake Shore Dr 50 50
162 Vineyard Ave City Limits Forest Park Blvd 45 45
163 Vineyard Ave Forest Park Blvd US 101 35 35
164 Vineyard Ave US 101 Oxnard Blvd 35 35
165 Vineyard Ave Oxnard Blvd H St 45 45
453
Existing vs. Proposed Speed Limit
Segment No. Street From To Posted Speed Limit (mph) Recommended Speed Limit (mph) 166 Vineyard Ave H St Ventura Rd 40 40
167 Vineyard Ave Ventura Rd Patterson Rd 40 40
168 Wooley Rd Harbor Blvd Tradewinds Dr 45 45
169 Wooley Rd Tradewinds Dr Victoria Ave 45 45
170 Wooley Rd Victoria Ave Patterson Rd 45 45
171 Wooley Rd Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 45 45
172 Wooley Rd Ventura Rd H St 40 40
173 Wooley Rd E St Oxnard Blvd 40 40
174 Wooley Rd Oxnard Blvd Richmond Ave 40 40
175 Wooley Rd Richmond Ave Rose Ave 40 40
454
Spot Speed Data Calculations Summary
455
1 A Street First Robert Ave 26-Apr 21-30 87.8% 26 30 25 2 Auto Center Dr Rose Ave Paseo Mercado 30-Mar 33-42 85.3% 38 41 40 3 Auto Center Dr Paseo Mercado Santa Clara 30-Mar 31-40 77.6% 37 40 40 4 Bard Rd J Street Saviers Rd 8-Mar 29-38 82.0% 32 37 30 5 Bard Rd Saviers Rd San Juan Ave 8-Mar 33-42 86.2% 38 42 35 6 Bard Rd San Juan Ave Rose Ave 8-Mar 32-41 90.8% 37 40 35 7 Bard Rd Rose Ave Pleasant Valley Rd 28-Jun 32-41 90.5% 36 39 35 8 C Street Pleasant Valley Rd Bard Rd 26-Apr 28-37 78.3% 33 37 25 9 C Street Bard Rd Channel Islands 26-Apr 26-35 75.6% 33 38 25 10 C Street Channel Islands Blvd Elm St 8-Mar 28-37 85.5% 33 37 30 11 C Street Elm St Wooley Rd 8-Mar 26-35 87.2% 31 35 30 12 C Street Wooley Rd Second St 8-Mar 26-35 86.7% 29 34 30 13 C Street Second St Doris Ave 8-Mar 27-36 82.6% 31 35 30 14 C Street Doris Ave Glenwood Dr 8-Mar 28-37 87.2% 32 35 30 15 C Street Glenwood Dr Gonzales Rd 8-Mar 27-36 88.5% 32 35 30 16 C Street Gonzales Rd Citrus Grove Ln 8-Mar 25-34 87.2% 29 33 30 17 Citrus Grove Ln C Street Oxnard Blvd 29-Jun 25-34 93.2% 29 33 30 18 Camino Del Sol Entrada Dr Rose Ave 25-Mar 32-41 72.8% 39 45 45 19 Camino Del Sol Rose Ave Lombard St 25-Mar 39-48 75.7% 43 49 45 20 Camino Del Sol Lombard St Rice Ave 22-Mar 39-48 76.6% 44 48 45 21 Camino Del Sol Rice Ave Kinetic Dr 25-Mar 38-47 78.0% 43 48 45 22 Camino Del Sol Kinetic Dr Del Norte Blvd 19-Apr 38-47 71.1% 42 47 45 23 Channel Islands Bl Harbor Blvd Victoria Ave 14-Apr 35-44 78.3% 40 45 45 24 Channel Islands Bl Ventura Rd J Street 11-Mar 31-40 80.1% 36 40 35 25 Channel Islands Bl J Street Saviers Rd 22-Mar 30-39 85.6% 35 39 35 26 Channel Islands Bl Saviers Rd Paula St 3/11&14 32-41 85.9% 36 39 35 27 Channel Islands Bl Paula St Oxnard Blvd 22-Mar 33-42 81.8% 38 42 40 28 Channel Islands Bl Oxnard Blvd Rice Ave 11-Mar 36-45 81.1% 40 45 40 29 Del Norte Blvd Fifth St Camino Del Sol 25-Mar 33-42 82.2% 39 43 50 30 Del Norte Blvd Camino Del Sol Lunar Ct 25-Mar 43-52 77.8% 48 52 50 31 Del Norte Blvd Lunar Ct Highway 101 25-Mar 43-52 75.5% 49 53 50 32 Doris Ave Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 14-Mar 40-49 76.5% 45 49 45 33 Doris Ave Ventura Rd F Street 17-May 25-34 86.3% 30 34 25 34 E Street Wooley Rd Fifth St 17-May 23-32 86.4% 26 30 25 35 Eastman Ave Lombard St Rice Ave 19-Apr 32-41 73.7% 37 42 40 36 Eastman Ave Rose Ave Lombard St 19-Apr 33-42 79.1% 38 43 40 37 Emerson Ave Pacific Ave Rose Ave 19-Apr 33-42 87.4% 38 41 40 38 Emerson Ave Rose Ave El Dorado Ave 19-Apr 33-42 88.9% 38 42 40 Spot Speed Data Calculation
10-Mile Pace
(mph) Segment No. Street From To Survey Date % in 10-Mile Pace 50th Percentile Speed (mph)
85th Percentile
Speed (mph)
Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
456
Spot Speed Data Calculation
10-Mile Pace
(mph) Segment No. Street From To Survey Date % in 10-Mile Pace 50th Percentile Speed (mph)
85th Percentile
Speed (mph)
Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
39 Etting Rd Pleasant Valley Rd East City Limits 22-Apr 24-33 81.0% 29 34 None 40 Fifth Street Victoria Ave Ventura Rd 29-Mar 40-49 88.3% 44 48 45 41 Fifth Street Ventura Rd C Street 29-Jun 30-39 78.3% 36 41 35 42 Fifth Street Oxnard Blvd RR Tracks 22-Apr 28-37 75.9% 33 37 35 43 Fifth Street RR Tracks Richmond Ave 22-Apr 35-44 71.8% 40 46 35 44 Fifth Street Richmond Ave Rose Ave 22-Apr 31-40 74.8% 36 41 35 45 Fifth Street Rose Ave Rice Ave 22-Apr 45-54 61.1% 49 55 55 46 Fifth Street Rice Ave Del Norte Blvd 22-Apr 47-56 61.9% 52 56 None 47 Gary Dr Albany Dr Rose Ave 4/22 &5/18 24-33 79.0% 28 33 30 48 Gonzales Rd Victoria Ave Merion Way 12-Apr 40-49 76.2% 44 49 45 49 Gonzales Rd Merion Way Patterson Rd 12-Apr 38-47 79.6% 43 48 45 50 Gonzales Rd Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 29-Mar 38-47 83.1% 43 46 45 51 Gonzales Rd Ventura Rd H Street 29-Mar 34-43 73.1% 38 43 45 52 Gonzales Rd H Street Oxnard Blvd 29-Mar 33-42 80.9% 39 43 45 53 Gonzales Rd Oxnard Blvd Snow Ave 29-Mar 39-48 83.0% 43 46 45 54 Gonzales Rd Snow Ave Rose Ave 29-Mar 38-47 78.4% 42 47 45 55 Gonzales Rd Rose Ave Lombard St 29-Mar 38-47 81.3% 42 47 45 56 Gonzales Rd Lombard St Rice Ave 29-Mar 38-47 78.7% 42 46 45 57 Graves Ave Celsius Ave Latigo Ave 5-Apr 32-41 68.2% 36 41 40 58 Graves Ave Latigo Ave Wankel Way 5-Apr 30-39 75.0% 36 41 40 59 H Street Violet Way Vineyard Ave 3-May 32-41 73.6% 36 41 40 60 H Street Vineyard Ave Gonzales Rd 14-Mar 36-45 80.8% 40 43 40 61 H Street Gonzales Rd Doris Ave 14-Mar 29-38 83.7% 33 37 30 62 H Street Doris Ave Second St 14-Mar 27-36 91.0% 33 35 30 63 H Street Second St Fifth St 14-Mar 28-37 88.8% 32 36 30 64 Harbor Blvd Bluefin Cir La Brea St 12-Apr 32-41 77.3% 37 41 40 65 Harbor Blvd La Brea St Channel Islands Blvd 12-Apr 33-42 79.1% 38 42 40 66 Harbor Blvd Channel Islands Blvd Eastbourne Bay 12-Apr 45-54 79.6% 49 53 50 67 Harbor Blvd Eastbourne Bay Wooley Rd 4/12 &4/26/202 46-55 78.7% 50 54 50 68 Harbor Blvd Wooley Rd Fifth St 4/12 &4/26/202 45-54 78.6% 49 53 50 69 Harbor Blvd Frontage Beach Way Wooley Rd X 15
70 Harbor Blvd Frontage Wooley Rd Channel Way X 15
71 Hemlock Street Victoria Ave Patterson Rd 22-Mar 33-42 82.5% 39 42 40 72 Hemlock Street Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 22-Mar 31-40 78.9% 34 39 35 73 Hobson Way Ninth St Fifth St 14-Apr 26-35 88.4% 30 33 30 74 Hueneme Rd J Street Saviers Rd 18-May 37-46 67.5% 42 48 45 75 Hueneme Rd Saviers Rd Edison Dr 22-Apr 37-46 72.6% 42 47 45 76 J Street Hueneme Rd Pleasant Valley Rd 11-Mar 27-36 90.1% 32 35 30 457
Spot Speed Data Calculation
10-Mile Pace
(mph) Segment No. Street From To Survey Date % in 10-Mile Pace 50th Percentile Speed (mph)
85th Percentile
Speed (mph)
Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
77 J Street Pleasant Valley Rd Bard Rd 11-Mar 29-38 84.0% 34 38 30 78 J Street Bard Rd Teakwood St 11-Mar 29-38 73.3% 33 39 30 79 J Street Teakwood St Channel Islands Blvd 11-Mar 28-37 84.5% 32 36 30 80 J Street Channel Islands Blvd Hill St 11-Mar 27-36 82.0% 31 36 30 81 J Street Hill St Ninth St 11-Mar 26-35 88.0% 31 35 30 82 Lockwood St Rose Ave Eastern Terminal 18-May 30-39 75.4% 34 39 35 83 Lombard St Gonzales Rd 150' n/o Posada Dr 18-May 23-32 84.0% 27 32 35 84 Lombard St Eastman Ave Camino Del Sol 5-Apr 33-42 75.6% 37 41 40 85 Mandalay Beach Rd Beach Way Wooley Rd 17-May 18-27 89.1% 23 26 25 86 Mandalay Beach Rd Wooley Rd Fifth St 17-May 19-28 85.5% 23 26 25 87 Maulhardt Rd Dodge Rd Pleasant Valley Rd 15-Apr 20-29 91.7% 26 29 None 88 Ninth St Ventura Rd Hobson Way 14-Apr 33-42 84.8% 36 41 40 89 Olds Rd Sanford St Etting Rd 18-May 26-35 71.3% 31 37 25 90 Oxnard Blvd Forest Park Blvd Town Center Drive 15-Apr 27-36 89.0% 32 35 35 91 Oxnard Blvd Town Center Drive Wagon Wheel Rd 15-Apr 41-50 71.5% 45 49 50 92 Oxnard Blvd Wagon Wheel Rd Vineyard Ave 15-Apr 41-50 77.1% 46 51 50 93 Oxnard Blvd Vineyard Ave Gonzales Rd 15-Apr 39-48 79.0% 42 46 45 94 Oxnard Blvd Gonzales Rd Robert Ave 15-Apr 36-45 70.8% 42 46 45 95 Oxnard Blvd Robert Ave Second St 15-Apr 29-38 73.2% 34 39 35 96 Oxnard Blvd Second St Seventh St 15-Apr 28-37 70.9% 33 37 30 97 Oxnard Blvd Seventh St Wooley Rd 15-Apr 29-38 81.8% 34 38 30 98 Oxnard Blvd Wooley Rd RR Tracks 15-Apr 33-42 77.1% 38 42 40 99 Oxnard Blvd RR Tracks Rose Ave 15-Apr 39-48 80.5% 43 48 45 100 Oxnard Blvd Rose Ave Channel Islands Overpass 15-Apr 44-53 74.1% 50 55 55 101 Oxnard Blvd Channel Islands Overpass Pleasant Valley Rd 16-Aug 50-59 80.3% 56 59 60 102 Pacific Ave Statham Blvd Wooley Rd 19-Apr 29-38 72.1% 36 42 35 103 Pacific Ave Wooley Rd Fifth St 19-Apr 26-35 75.0% 30 36 35 104 Patterson Rd Doris Ave Gonzales Rd 17-Mar 37-46 83.5% 41 45 40 105 Patterson Rd Gonzales Rd Vineyard Ave 17-Mar 33-42 85.0% 39 42 40 106 Patterson Rd Hemlock St Wooley Rd 22-Mar 38-47 78.3% 44 48 45 107 Patterson Rd Wooley Rd Fifth St 17-Mar 39-48 87.7% 45 47 45 108 Peninsula Rd So Terminal Channel Islands 26-Apr 23-32 75.5% 29 33 25 109 Perkins Rd Hueneme Rd Pleasant Valley Rd 18-May 22-31 87.7% 28 31 25 110 Pleasant Valley Rd J Street Saviers Rd 22-Mar 30-39 83.6% 35 38 35 111 Pleasant Valley Rd Saviers Rd Squires Dr 22-Mar 30-39 88.6% 35 38 35 112 Pleasant Valley Rd Squires Dr Rose Ave 22-Mar 39-48 79.4% 43 46 45 113 Pleasant Valley Rd Rose Ave Bard Rd 15-Apr 41-50 78.7% 46 50 45 114 Pleasant Valley Rd Bard Rd SR-1 22-Mar 38-47 79.1% 43 47 45 458
Spot Speed Data Calculation
10-Mile Pace
(mph) Segment No. Street From To Survey Date % in 10-Mile Pace 50th Percentile Speed (mph)
85th Percentile
Speed (mph)
Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
115 Rice Ave Fifth St Camino Del Sol 30-Mar 43-52 72.7% 48 52 50 116 Rice Ave Camino Del Sol Latigo Ave 30-Mar 42-51 65.0% 47 53 50 117 Rice Ave Latigo Ave Gonzales Rd 30-Mar 43-52 67.2% 48 53 50 118 Rice Ave Gonzales Rd 101 S/B 30-Mar 44-53 74.0% 49 53 50 119 Rice Ave 101 S/B City Limits 30-Mar 37-46 78.5% 40 44 40 120 Rose Ave Sanford St Bard Rd 30-Mar 37-46 84.8% 42 46 45 121 Rose Ave Bard Rd Channel Islands Blvd 30-Mar 39-48 81.2% 44 48 45 122 Rose Ave Channel Islands Blvd Emerson Ave 30-Mar 41-50 84.2% 45 49 45 123 Rose Ave Emerson Ave Wooley Rd 30-Mar 41-50 79.8% 45 50 45 124 Rose Ave Wooley Rd Fifth St 30-Mar 37-46 70.0% 43 48 45 125 Rose Ave Fifth St Camino Del Sol 30-Mar 35-44 80.8% 39 43 40 126 Rose Ave Camino Del Sol Gonzales Rd 30-Mar 39-48 77.5% 43 48 45 127 Rose Ave Gonzales Rd Highway 101 30-Mar 32-41 85.0% 37 41 40 128 Rose Ave Highway 101 Collins St 25-Mar 33-42 80.6% 39 43 40 129 Saviers Rd Hueneme Rd Pleasant Valley Rd 14-Mar 36-45 76.6% 41 45 40 130 Saviers Rd Pleasant Valley Rd Bard Rd 14-Mar 35-44 85.4% 39 43 40 131 Saviers Rd Bard Rd Channel Islands Blvd 22-Apr 33-42 91.0% 38 41 40 132 Saviers Rd Channel Islands Blvd Elm St 22-Apr 33-42 81.8% 38 42 40 133 Saviers Rd Elm St Wooley Rd 14-Mar 35-44 83.1% 39 43 40 134 Second St Ventura Rd H St 14-Mar 29-38 88.2% 34 38 35 135 Statham Blvd Channel Islands Blvd Oxnard Blvd 22-Apr 33-42 76.9% 36 40 40 136 Sturgis Rd Lombard St Elevard St 19-Apr 36-45 78.5% 40 45 40 137 Sturgis Rd Elevard St Del Norte Blvd 19-Apr 36-45 75.2% 41 45 40 138 Teal Club Rd Victoria Ave Patterson Rd 26-Apr 38-47 62.5% 43 49 35 139 Teal Club Rd Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 3-May 33-42 56.3% 39 46 35 140 Third Street A St Juanita Ave 5-Apr 33-42 81.0% 37 41 35 141 Third Street Juanita Rose Ave 17-May 35-44 86.0% 40 44 40 142 Ventura Blvd Auto Center Dr Santa Clara Ave 14-Apr 31-40 81.4% 36 39 35 143 Ventura Blvd Vineyard Ave Balboa St 26-Apr 29-38 81.5% 34 38 40 144 Ventura Blvd Balboa St Rose Ave 26-Apr 34-43 76.2% 38 42 40 145 Ventura Rd Channel Islands Blvd Hemlock St 14-Apr 37-46 82.2% 41 45 45 146 Ventura Rd Hemlock St Wooley Rd 14-Apr 36-45 82.0% 42 46 45 147 Ventura Rd Wooley Rd Fifth St 37-46 83.9% 43 46 45
148 Ventura Rd Fifth St Second St 14-Apr 40-49 84.1% 45 48 45 149 Ventura Rd Second St Doris Ave 14-Apr 39-48 78.2% 44 48 45 150 Ventura Rd Doris Ave Gonzales Rd 14-Apr 39-48 81.5% 45 48 45 151 Ventura Rd Gonzales Rd Vineyard Ave 17-Mar 39-48 74.5% 43 48 45 152 Ventura Rd Vineyard Ave RR Crossing 14-Apr 42-51 67.7% 48 52 50 459
Spot Speed Data Calculation
10-Mile Pace
(mph) Segment No. Street From To Survey Date % in 10-Mile Pace 50th Percentile Speed (mph)
85th Percentile
Speed (mph)
Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
153 Ventura Rd RR Crossing Town Center Dr 14-Apr 35-44 79.5% 40 44 40 154 Victoria Ave Santa Clara River Bridge Gonzales Rd 14-Apr 51-60 77.3% 54 59 55 155 Victoria Ave Gonzales Rd Doris Ave 22-Mar 47-56 84.2% 53 57 55 156 Victoria Ave Doris Ave Teal Club Rd 22-Mar 47-56 76.6% 51 56 55 157 Victoria Ave Teal Club Rd Fifth St 29-Mar 47-56 75.0% 52 56 55 158 Victoria Ave Fifth St Wooley Rd 29-Mar 43-52 83.7% 48 51 50 159 Victoria Ave Wooley Rd Hemlock St 29-Mar 43-52 77.6% 47 52 50 160 Victoria Ave Hemlock St Curlew Way 29-Mar 42-51 82.8% 46 51 50 161 Victoria Ave Curlew Way Lake Shore Dr 29-Mar 43-52 77.7% 47 51 50 162 Vineyard Ave City Limits Forest Park Blvd 22-Apr 37-46 73.2% 44 48 45 163 Vineyard Ave Forest Park Blvd US 101 22-Apr 31-40 72.6% 36 40 35 164 Vineyard Ave US 101 Oxnard Blvd 22-Apr 30-39 82.9% 36 39 35 165 Vineyard Ave Oxnard Blvd H St 22-Apr 37-46 72.6% 42 46 45 166 Vineyard Ave H St Ventura Rd 22-Apr 39-48 76.9% 42 48 40 167 Vineyard Ave Ventura Rd Patterson Rd 1-Aug 38-47 74.7% 44 49 40 168 Wooley Rd Harbor Blvd Tradewinds Dr 17-Mar 36-45 82.2% 40 45 45 169 Wooley Rd Tradewinds Dr Victoria Ave 17-Mar 41-50 75.6% 46 50 45 170 Wooley Rd Victoria Ave Patterson Rd 17-Mar 42-51 76.2% 46 50 45 171 Wooley Rd Patterson Rd Ventura Rd 17-Mar 41-50 74.2% 46 51 45 172 Wooley Rd Ventura Rd H St 14-Apr 37-46 82.7% 41 45 40 173 Wooley Rd E St Oxnard Blvd 17-Mar 36-45 84.2% 40 45 40 174 Wooley Rd Oxnard Blvd Richmond Ave 17-Mar 36-45 74.4% 42 46 40 175 Wooley Rd Richmond Ave Rose Ave 17-Mar 35-44 83.1% 39 44 40 460
Spot Speed Survey Study Summary
and
Survey Data Calculations
461
CITY OF OXNARD 1
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/26/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:35-3:10p 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 26 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 30 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 21 To 30 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87.8%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.21
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 4000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3000
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 48'-48'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial/Residential
Comments
ID:
A St First St / Robert Ave
at Palm Dr
CVC 22358.8(a), high collision rate, keep
existing speed limit
462
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: A St
Location: at Palm Dr
Between: First St / Robert Ave Ref. # 1
Cumulative Date: 4/26/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 3 1.83% 1.83%
21 6 3.66% 5.49%
22 9 5.49% 10.98% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 19 11.59% 22.56% Mean Speed: 26
24 22 13.41% 35.98% Standard Deviation: 3
25 21 12.80% 48.78% Standard error of the mean: 0.23
26 26 15.85% 64.63% 50th Percentile: 26
27 12 7.32% 71.95% 85th Percentile: 30
28 9 5.49% 77.44% 97th Percentile: 34
29 10 6.10% 83.54% 10 Mile Pace: 21 to 30
30 10 6.10% 89.63% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 87.80% 31 5 3.05% 92.68% Comments:
32 3 1.83% 94.51%
33 3 1.83% 96.34%
34 5 3.05% 99.39%
35 0 0.00% 99.39%
36 0 0.00% 99.39%
37 0 0.00% 99.39%
38 1 0.61% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 164 100%
spd_form.xls
2:35-3:10p
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
463
CITY OF OXNARD 2
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wedneday Hours: 3:40-4:00 PM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85.3%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.07
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 17155
Traffic Control Type Traffice signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4000
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 80'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2 /direction/Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments
ID:
Auto Center Drive Rose Ave/Paseo Mercado
e/o Collins St.
85th percentile speed
464
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Auto Center Drive
Location: e/o Collins St.
Between: Rose Ave/Paseo Mercado Ref. # 2
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY/AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 38
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.24
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 38
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 41
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 45
29 2 1.28% 1.28% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 0 0.00% 1.28% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 85.26%
31 1 0.64% 1.92% Comments:
32 5 3.21% 5.13%
33 10 6.41% 11.54%
34 13 8.33% 19.87%
35 8 5.13% 25.00%
36 15 9.62% 34.62%
37 19 12.18% 46.79%
38 19 12.18% 58.97%
39 24 15.38% 74.36%
40 13 8.33% 82.69%
41 5 3.21% 85.90%
42 7 4.49% 90.38%
43 4 2.56% 92.95%
44 5 3.21% 96.15%
45 4 2.56% 98.72%
46 2 1.28% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 156 100%
spd_form.xls
3:40-4:00 PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
465
CITY OF OXNARD 3
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 3:10-3:35 PM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 40 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 31 To 40 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77.6%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 17155
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2700
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 80'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments
ID:
Auto Center Drive Paseo Mercado / Santa Clara
300 ft E of Los Olivos
85th percentile speed
466
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Auto Center Drive
Location: 300 ft E of Los Olivos
Between: Paseo Mercado / Santa Clara Ref. # 3
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY/AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.33
26 1 0.68% 0.68% 50th Percentile: 37
27 1 0.68% 1.36% 85th Percentile: 40
28 1 0.68% 2.04% 97th Percentile: 44
29 5 3.40% 5.44% 10 Mile Pace: 31 to 40
30 5 3.40% 8.84% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 77.55%
31 9 6.12% 14.97% Comments:
32 5 3.40% 18.37%
33 11 7.48% 25.85%
34 12 8.16% 34.01%
35 8 5.44% 39.46%
36 15 10.20% 49.66%
37 16 10.88% 60.54%
38 13 8.84% 69.39%
39 12 8.16% 77.55%
40 13 8.84% 86.39%
41 3 2.04% 88.44%
42 9 6.12% 94.56%
43 2 1.36% 95.92%
44 2 1.36% 97.28%
45 3 2.04% 99.32%
46 1 0.68% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 147 100%
spd_form.xls
3:10-3:35 PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
467
CITY OF OXNARD 4
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 9:50-10:20 AM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 32 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 29 To 38 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 4
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.94
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8233
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2500
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 60'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction /TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type uncontrolled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residential /high school
Comments Hueneme High/uncontrolled crosswalk
ID:
Bard Road J St / Saviers Rd
200 ft E of F St
CVC 22358.8(a), high collision rate, school
safety, keep existing speed
468
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Bard Road
Location: 200 ft E of F St
Between: J St / Saviers Rd Ref. # 4
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks: Hueneme HS
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 33
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 4 3.01% 3.01% 50th Percentile: 32
27 6 4.51% 7.52% 85th Percentile: 37
28 7 5.26% 12.78% 97th Percentile: 40
29 16 12.03% 24.81% 10 Mile Pace: 29 to 38
30 9 6.77% 31.58% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 81.95%
31 12 9.02% 40.60% Comments:
32 13 9.77% 50.38%
33 14 10.53% 60.90%
34 12 9.02% 69.92%
35 9 6.77% 76.69%
36 9 6.77% 83.46%
37 7 5.26% 88.72%
38 8 6.02% 94.74%
39 2 1.50% 96.24%
40 3 2.26% 98.50%
41 0 0.00% 98.50%
42 0 0.00% 98.50%
43 1 0.75% 99.25%
44 1 0.75% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 133 100%
spd_form.xls
9:50-10:20 AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
469
CITY OF OXNARD 5
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 9:15-9:45 AM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.50
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 11956
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2400
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 75'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2 /direction /Painted
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type Uncontrolled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residentail /Jr High
Comments Charles Blackstock Jr.High / Uncontrolled school crosswalk ID:
Bard Road Saviers Rd / San Juan Ave
500 ft W of Justin Way
CVC 22358.8(a), school safety, keep existing
speed limit
470
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Bard Road
Location: 500 ft W of Justin Way
Between: Saviers Rd / San Juan Ave Ref. # 5
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 39
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.34
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 38
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 42
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 48
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 1 0.72% 0.72% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 86.23%
31 1 0.72% 1.45% Comments:
32 2 1.45% 2.90%
33 8 5.80% 8.70%
34 5 3.62% 12.32%
35 3 2.17% 14.49%
36 25 18.12% 32.61%
37 13 9.42% 42.03%
38 15 10.87% 52.90%
39 16 11.59% 64.49%
40 10 7.25% 71.74%
41 10 7.25% 78.99%
42 14 10.14% 89.13%
43 4 2.90% 92.03%
44 0 0.00% 92.03%
45 4 2.90% 94.93%
46 0 0.00% 94.93%
47 2 1.45% 96.38%
48 3 2.17% 98.55%
49 1 0.72% 99.28%
50 1 0.72% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 138 100%
spd_form.xls
9:15-9:45 AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
471
CITY OF OXNARD 6
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 10:25-10:55 AM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 40 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 32 To 41 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 91%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.13
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 11956
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal / Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3200
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 75'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2 /direction /raised & painted median Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type Controlled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residentail /Elementary
Comments Fred Williams Elementary School, School crosswalk (stop controlled) ID:
Bard Road San Juan Ave / Rose Ave
300 ft W of Rose Ave
CVC 22358.8(a), school safety, keep existing
speed limit
472
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Bard Road
Location: 300 ft W of Rose Ave
Between: San Juan Ave / Rose Ave Ref. # 6
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks: School
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 37
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.26
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 37
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 40
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 43
29 1 0.76% 0.76% 10 Mile Pace: 32 to 41
30 2 1.53% 2.29% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 90.84%
31 2 1.53% 3.82% Comments:
32 4 3.05% 6.87%
33 7 5.34% 12.21%
34 12 9.16% 21.37%
35 16 12.21% 33.59%
36 15 11.45% 45.04%
37 17 12.98% 58.02%
38 22 16.79% 74.81%
39 13 9.92% 84.73%
40 8 6.11% 90.84%
41 5 3.82% 94.66%
42 2 1.53% 96.18%
43 3 2.29% 98.47%
44 0 0.00% 98.47%
45 1 0.76% 99.24%
46 0 0.00% 99.24%
47 1 0.76% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 131 100%
spd_form.xls
10:25-10:55 AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
473
CITY OF OXNARD 7
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 6/28/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:30 - 4:00p Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 32 To 41 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 91%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 9500
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2250
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 75'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2 /direction /Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /city college
Comments Oxnard city college
ID:
CVC 22358.6, Oxnard City College traffic
safety
Bard Road Rose Ave / Pleasant Valley Rd
e/w/o Simpson
474
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Bard Road
Location: e/w/o Simpson
Between: Rose Ave / Pleasant Valley Rd Ref. # 7
Cumulative Date: 6/28/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks: Oxnard City College
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.28
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 36
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 39
28 2 1.72% 1.72% 97th Percentile: 42
29 3 2.59% 4.31% 10 Mile Pace: 32 to 41
30 0 0.00% 4.31% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 90.52%
31 2 1.72% 6.03% Comments:
32 5 4.31% 10.34%
33 10 8.62% 18.97%
34 7 6.03% 25.00%
35 13 11.21% 36.21%
36 17 14.66% 50.86%
37 16 13.79% 64.66%
38 13 11.21% 75.86%
39 15 12.93% 88.79%
40 3 2.59% 91.38%
41 6 5.17% 96.55%
42 1 0.86% 97.41%
43 3 2.59% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 116 100%
spd_form.xls
3:30 - 4:00p
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
475
CITY OF OXNARD 8
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/26/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 1:45 - 2:25P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 28 To 37 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.52
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2300
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 48'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type Uncontrolled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use School /Commercial /Residential
Comments Hueneme High /uncontrolled school crosswalk
ID:
C Street Pleasant Valley Rd / Bard Rd
n/o Van Ness Ave
22358.8(a), school safety, keep existing
speed limit
476
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: C Street
Location: n/o Van Ness Ave
Between: Pleasant Valley Rd / Bard Rd Ref. # 8
Cumulative Date: 4/26/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks: Hueneme Hgh School
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 32
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 7 6.60% 6.60% Standard error of the mean: 0.39
26 1 0.94% 7.55% 50th Percentile: 33
27 3 2.83% 10.38% 85th Percentile: 37
28 5 4.72% 15.09% 97th Percentile: 39
29 11 10.38% 25.47% 10 Mile Pace: 28 to 37
30 10 9.43% 34.91% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.30% 31 9 8.49% 43.40% Comments:
32 6 5.66% 49.06%
33 10 9.43% 58.49%
34 12 11.32% 69.81%
35 5 4.72% 74.53%
36 10 9.43% 83.96%
37 5 4.72% 88.68%
38 4 3.77% 92.45%
39 7 6.60% 99.06%
40 1 0.94% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 106 100%
spd_form.xls
1:45 - 2:25P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
477
CITY OF OXNARD 9
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/26/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 1:45 - 2:25P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 26 To 35 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.11
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 18983
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4665
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 50'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /school /city park
Comments Green Jr.High /City park /uncontrolled school crosswalk ID:
C Street Bard Rd / Channel Islands
at Willow St
CV 22358.8(a), school safety, keep existing
speed limit
478
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: C Street
Location: at Willow St
Between: Bard Rd / Channel Islands Ref. # 9
Cumulative Date: 4/26/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks: Green Jr. High, City Park
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 33
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 2 1.53% 1.53% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 7 5.34% 6.87% 50th Percentile: 33
27 4 3.05% 9.92% 85th Percentile: 38
28 3 2.29% 12.21% 97th Percentile: 42
29 9 6.87% 19.08% 10 Mile Pace: 26 to 35
30 7 5.34% 24.43% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 75.57%
31 12 9.16% 33.59% Comments:
32 12 9.16% 42.75%
33 22 16.79% 59.54%
34 15 11.45% 70.99%
35 8 6.11% 77.10%
36 3 2.29% 79.39%
37 5 3.82% 83.21%
38 6 4.58% 87.79%
39 4 3.05% 90.84%
40 4 3.05% 93.89%
41 3 2.29% 96.18%
42 5 3.82% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 131 100%
spd_form.xls
1:45 - 2:25P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
479
CITY OF OXNARD 10
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 11:02 - 11:32a 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 28 To 37 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.16
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 18983
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3260
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 50'-60'
Parking Restriction some near Channel Island
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction /TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /city park /school
Comments Residential /commercial /Santa Clara High /Rudolph Beck Memorial Park ID:
C Street Channel Islands / Elm St
at Juniper St
CVC 22358.8(a), school safety, keep existing
speed limit
480
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: C Street
Location: at Juniper St
Between: Channel Islands / Elm St Ref. # 10
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks: Santa Clara High, city park
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 33
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.31
26 1 0.61% 0.61% 50th Percentile: 33
27 4 2.42% 3.03% 85th Percentile: 37
28 8 4.85% 7.88% 97th Percentile: 41
29 16 9.70% 17.58% 10 Mile Pace: 28 to 37
30 12 7.27% 24.85% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 85.45% 31 16 9.70% 34.55% Comments:
32 21 12.73% 47.27%
33 26 15.76% 63.03%
34 18 10.91% 73.94%
35 10 6.06% 80.00%
36 8 4.85% 84.85%
37 6 3.64% 88.48%
38 2 1.21% 89.70%
39 7 4.24% 93.94%
40 5 3.03% 96.97%
41 3 1.82% 98.79%
42 0 0.00% 98.79%
43 0 0.00% 98.79%
44 1 0.61% 99.39%
45 1 0.61% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 165 100%
spd_form.xls
11:02 - 11:32a
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
481
CITY OF OXNARD 11
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 11:35AM-12:05PM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 31 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 26 To 35 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 6
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.95
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13019
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2340
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 50'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
C Street Elm St / Wooley Rd
200 ft S of Hill St
CVC 22358.8(a), high collision rate, keep
existing speed limit
482
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: C Street
Location: 200 ft S of Hill St
Between: Elm St / Wooley Rd Ref. # 11
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 1 0.75% 0.75% Mean Speed: 31
24 0 0.00% 0.75% Standard Deviation: 3
25 2 1.50% 2.26% Standard error of the mean: 0.26
26 10 7.52% 9.77% 50th Percentile: 31
27 6 4.51% 14.29% 85th Percentile: 35
28 9 6.77% 21.05% 97th Percentile: 39
29 17 12.78% 33.83% 10 Mile Pace: 26 to 35
30 17 12.78% 46.62% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 87.22% 31 12 9.02% 55.64% Comments:
32 13 9.77% 65.41%
33 17 12.78% 78.20%
34 7 5.26% 83.46%
35 8 6.02% 89.47%
36 7 5.26% 94.74%
37 1 0.75% 95.49%
38 2 1.50% 96.99%
39 1 0.75% 97.74%
40 2 1.50% 99.25%
41 1 0.75% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 133 100%
spd_form.xls
11:35AM-12:05PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
483
CITY OF OXNARD 12
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 12:10-12:40PM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 29 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 34 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 26 To 35 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 11
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.52
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8260
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4230
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 50'-60'
Parking Restriction Partial
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments Driffill Elementary school
ID:
C Street Wooley Rd / Second St
200 ft S of Sixth St
CVC 22358.6, high collision rate, school
safety, keep existing speed limit
484
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: C Street
Location: 200 ft S of Sixth St
Between: Wooley Rd / Second St Ref. # 12
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks: Driffill Elementary School
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 3 1.73% 1.73% Mean Speed: 30
24 8 4.62% 6.36% Standard Deviation: 3
25 3 1.73% 8.09% Standard error of the mean: 0.23
26 10 5.78% 13.87% 50th Percentile: 29
27 16 9.25% 23.12% 85th Percentile: 34
28 14 8.09% 31.21% 97th Percentile: 36
29 34 19.65% 50.87% 10 Mile Pace: 26 to 35
30 22 12.72% 63.58% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 86.71% 31 14 8.09% 71.68% Comments:
32 7 4.05% 75.72%
33 15 8.67% 84.39%
34 12 6.94% 91.33%
35 6 3.47% 94.80%
36 5 2.89% 97.69%
37 2 1.16% 98.84%
38 0 0.00% 98.84%
39 1 0.58% 99.42%
40 1 0.58% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 173 100%
spd_form.xls
12:10-12:40PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
485
CITY OF OXNARD 13
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:08-3:40PM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 31 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 27 To 36 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.51
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8260
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal/ Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2300
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 50'-40'
Parking Restriction Partial
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class III
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Commercial /park
Comments Wilson Park
ID:
C Street Second St / Doris Ave
at Palm Dr
CVC 22358.8(a), city park, keep existing
speed limit
486
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: C Street
Location: at Palm Dr
Between: Second St / Doris Ave Ref. # 13
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks: City park
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 1 0.58% 0.58% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.58% Mean Speed: 31
24 4 2.33% 2.91% Standard Deviation: 4
25 6 3.49% 6.40% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 8 4.65% 11.05% 50th Percentile: 31
27 7 4.07% 15.12% 85th Percentile: 35
28 8 4.65% 19.77% 97th Percentile: 38
29 27 15.70% 35.47% 10 Mile Pace: 27 to 36
30 15 8.72% 44.19% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 82.56% 31 23 13.37% 57.56% Comments:
32 15 8.72% 66.28%
33 22 12.79% 79.07%
34 6 3.49% 82.56%
35 8 4.65% 87.21%
36 11 6.40% 93.60%
37 5 2.91% 96.51%
38 1 0.58% 97.09%
39 1 0.58% 97.67%
40 1 0.58% 98.26%
41 1 0.58% 98.84%
42 0 0.00% 98.84%
43 0 0.00% 98.84%
44 2 1.16% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 172 100%
spd_form.xls
3:08-3:40PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
487
CITY OF OXNARD 14
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:35-3:05PM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 32 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 28 To 37 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.52
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8260
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2235
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 40'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class III
Crosswalks/Type Uncontrolled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments Uncontrolled school crosswalk
ID:
C Street Doris Ave / Glenwood Dr
S of Robert Ave
CVC 22358.8(a), school safety, keep existing
speed limit
488
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: C Street
Location: S of Robert Ave
Between: Doris Ave / Glenwood Dr Ref. # 14
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 1 0.56% 0.56% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 1 0.56% 1.11% Mean Speed: 32
24 0 0.00% 1.11% Standard Deviation: 3
25 2 1.11% 2.22% Standard error of the mean: 0.22
26 9 5.00% 7.22% 50th Percentile: 32
27 4 2.22% 9.44% 85th Percentile: 35
28 10 5.56% 15.00% 97th Percentile: 38
29 21 11.67% 26.67% 10 Mile Pace: 28 to 37
30 20 11.11% 37.78% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 87.22% 31 19 10.56% 48.33% Comments:
32 23 12.78% 61.11%
33 25 13.89% 75.00%
34 16 8.89% 83.89%
35 8 4.44% 88.33%
36 10 5.56% 93.89%
37 5 2.78% 96.67%
38 3 1.67% 98.33%
39 0 0.00% 98.33%
40 1 0.56% 98.89%
41 2 1.11% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 180 100%
spd_form.xls
2:35-3:05PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
489
CITY OF OXNARD 15
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:00-2:30PM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 32 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 27 To 36 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.31
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8260
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1860
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 40'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class III
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
C Street Glenwood Dr / Gonzales Rd
at Ivywood Dr
CVC 22358.8(a), keep existing speed limit
490
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: C Street
Location: at Ivywood Dr
Between: Glenwood Dr / Gonzales Rd Ref. # 15
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00% 30 mph
21 0 0.00% 0.00% CVC 22358.8(a), keep existing speed limit 22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 32
24 1 0.55% 0.55% Standard Deviation: 3
25 4 2.19% 2.73% Standard error of the mean: 0.22
26 8 4.37% 7.10% 50th Percentile: 32
27 6 3.28% 10.38% 85th Percentile: 35
28 6 3.28% 13.66% 97th Percentile: 38
29 22 12.02% 25.68% 10 Mile Pace: 27 to 36
30 21 11.48% 37.16% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 88.52% 31 23 12.57% 49.73% Comments:
32 22 12.02% 61.75%
33 26 14.21% 75.96%
34 14 7.65% 83.61%
35 8 4.37% 87.98%
36 14 7.65% 95.63%
37 2 1.09% 96.72%
38 1 0.55% 97.27%
39 2 1.09% 98.36%
40 3 1.64% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 183 100%
spd_form.xls
2:00-2:30PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
491
CITY OF OXNARD 16
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 12:45-1:00PM / 3:43-4:00PM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 29 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 25 To 34 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.62
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8260
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 720
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 64'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction /TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments
ID:
C Street Gonzales Rd / Citrus Grove Ln
350' n/o Gonzales Rd
CVC 22358.6
492
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: C St / Citrus Grove
Location: 350' n/o Gonzales Rd
Between: Gonzales Rd / Citrus Grove Ln Ref. # 16
Cumulative Date: 3/8/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 4 2.84% 2.84% Mean Speed: 29
24 3 2.13% 4.96% Standard Deviation: 3
25 12 8.51% 13.48% Standard error of the mean: 0.25
26 19 13.48% 26.95% 50th Percentile: 29
27 10 7.09% 34.04% 85th Percentile: 33
28 17 12.06% 46.10% 97th Percentile: 36
29 15 10.64% 56.74% 10 Mile Pace: 25 to 34
30 14 9.93% 66.67% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 87.23% 31 12 8.51% 75.18% Comments:
32 9 6.38% 81.56%
33 6 4.26% 85.82%
34 9 6.38% 92.20%
35 2 1.42% 93.62%
36 6 4.26% 97.87%
37 2 1.42% 99.29%
38 0 0.00% 99.29%
39 1 0.71% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 141 100%
spd_form.xls
12:45-1:00PM / 3:43-4:00PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
493
CITY OF OXNARD 17
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 6/29/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 10:30 - 11:10 A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 29 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 25 To 34 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 93%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 4000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1130
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 38'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments
ID:
Citrus Grove C St / Oxnard Bl
500' w/o Oxnard Bl
CVC 22358.6
494
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Citrus Grove
Location: 500' w/o Oxnard Bl
Between: C St / Oxnard Bl Ref. # 17
Cumulative Date: 6/29/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 30
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 15 14.56% 14.56% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 8 7.77% 22.33% 50th Percentile: 29
27 8 7.77% 30.10% 85th Percentile: 33
28 9 8.74% 38.83% 97th Percentile: 36
29 15 14.56% 53.40% 10 Mile Pace: 25 to 34
30 13 12.62% 66.02% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 93.20% 31 8 7.77% 73.79% Comments:
32 8 7.77% 81.55%
33 8 7.77% 89.32%
34 4 3.88% 93.20%
35 2 1.94% 95.15%
36 3 2.91% 98.06%
37 0 0.00% 98.06%
38 0 0.00% 98.06%
39 1 0.97% 99.03%
40 0 0.00% 99.03%
41 0 0.00% 99.03%
42 1 0.97% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 103 100%
spd_form.xls
10:30 - 11:10 A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
495
CITY OF OXNARD 18
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 9:55-10:40AM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 45 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 32 To 41 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.47
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4370
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 80'-92'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Park
Comments Del Sol Park
ID:
Camino Del Sol Entrada Dr / Rose Ave
at Village of San Miguel
85th percentile speed
496
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Camino Del Sol
Location: at Village of San Miguel
Between: Entrada Dr / Rose Ave Ref. # 18
Cumulative Date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 39
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.39
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 39
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 45
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 47
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 32 to 41
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 72.82%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 4 3.88% 3.88%
33 7 6.80% 10.68%
34 4 3.88% 14.56%
35 4 3.88% 18.45%
36 9 8.74% 27.18%
37 10 9.71% 36.89%
38 11 10.68% 47.57%
39 10 9.71% 57.28%
40 7 6.80% 64.08%
41 9 8.74% 72.82%
42 3 2.91% 75.73%
43 3 2.91% 78.64%
44 6 5.83% 84.47%
45 4 3.88% 88.35%
46 4 3.88% 92.23%
47 5 4.85% 97.09%
48 1 0.97% 98.06%
49 1 0.97% 99.03%
50 0 0.00% 99.03%
51 0 0.00% 99.03%
52 1 0.97% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 103 100%
spd_form.xls
9:55-10:40AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
497
CITY OF OXNARD 19
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 10:45-11:15Am Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 39 To 48 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 6
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.98
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 9000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3280
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 64'-80'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Industrial /Farm
Comments Proposed high school site / Del Sol High school ID:
Camino Del Sol Rose Ave / Lombard St
300 ft W of Gibraltar St
CVC 22358.6, high collision rate
498
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Camino Del Sol
Location: 300 ft W of Gibraltar St
Between: Rose Ave / Lombard St Ref. # 19
Cumulative Date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 44
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.38
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 43
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 49
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 56
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 39 to 48
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 75.72%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 1 0.58% 0.58%
35 2 1.16% 1.73%
36 3 1.73% 3.47%
37 6 3.47% 6.94%
38 4 2.31% 9.25%
39 11 6.36% 15.61%
40 11 6.36% 21.97%
41 9 5.20% 27.17%
42 23 13.29% 40.46%
43 19 10.98% 51.45%
44 11 6.36% 57.80%
45 12 6.94% 64.74%
46 21 12.14% 76.88%
47 7 4.05% 80.92%
48 7 4.05% 84.97%
49 8 4.62% 89.60%
50 4 2.31% 91.91%
51 3 1.73% 93.64%
52 1 0.58% 94.22%
53 2 1.16% 95.38%
54 1 0.58% 95.95%
55 1 0.58% 96.53%
56 1 0.58% 97.11%
57 2 1.16% 98.27%
58 3 1.73% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 173 100%
spd_form.xls
10:45-11:15Am
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
499
CITY OF OXNARD 20
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 11:18-11:45AM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 44 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 39 To 48 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.20
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 12000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2000
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 82'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Camino Del Sol Lombard St / Rice Ave
at Graves Ave
CVC 22358.6
500
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Camino Del Sol
Location: at Graves Ave
Between: Lombard St / Rice Ave Ref. # 20
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 44
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.4
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 44
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 48
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 53
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 39 to 48
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 76.62%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 1 0.65% 0.65%
34 4 2.60% 3.25%
35 0 0.00% 3.25%
36 3 1.95% 5.19%
37 1 0.65% 5.84%
38 7 4.55% 10.39%
39 9 5.84% 16.23%
40 8 5.19% 21.43%
41 7 4.55% 25.97%
42 17 11.04% 37.01%
43 14 9.09% 46.10%
44 11 7.14% 53.25%
45 6 3.90% 57.14%
46 16 10.39% 67.53%
47 14 9.09% 76.62%
48 16 10.39% 87.01%
49 4 2.60% 89.61%
50 6 3.90% 93.51%
51 2 1.30% 94.81%
52 2 1.30% 96.10%
53 2 1.30% 97.40%
54 2 1.30% 98.70%
55 0 0.00% 98.70%
56 1 0.65% 99.35%
57 1 0.65% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 154 100%
spd_form.xls
11:18-11:45AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
501
CITY OF OXNARD 21
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 11:50AM-12:20PM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 38 To 47 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.72
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2880
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 94'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Camino Del Sol Rice Ave / Kinetic Dr
at Elevar St
CVC 22358.6
502
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Camino Del Sol
Location: at Elevar St
Between: Rice Ave / Kinetic Dr Ref. # 21
Cumulative Date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 43
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.4
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 43
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 48
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 54
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 38 to 47
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 77.99%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 1 0.63% 0.63%
35 1 0.63% 1.26%
36 5 3.14% 4.40%
37 3 1.89% 6.29%
38 13 8.18% 14.47%
39 14 8.81% 23.27%
40 8 5.03% 28.30%
41 10 6.29% 34.59%
42 14 8.81% 43.40%
43 15 9.43% 52.83%
44 12 7.55% 60.38%
45 12 7.55% 67.92%
46 15 9.43% 77.36%
47 11 6.92% 84.28%
48 5 3.14% 87.42%
49 4 2.52% 89.94%
50 4 2.52% 92.45%
51 3 1.89% 94.34%
52 3 1.89% 96.23%
53 1 0.63% 96.86%
54 2 1.26% 98.11%
55 1 0.63% 98.74%
56 2 1.26% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 159 100%
spd_form.xls
11:50AM-12:20PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
503
CITY OF OXNARD 22
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 11:50AM-12:20PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 47 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 38 To 47 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.53
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1830
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 94'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Camino Del Sol Kinetic Dr / Del Norte Bl
btw Kinetic and Del Norte
85th percentile speed
504
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Camino Del Sol
Location: btw Kinetic and Del Norte
Between: Kinetic Dr / Del Norte Bl Ref. # 22
Cumulative Date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 42
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.41
26 1 0.66% 0.66% 50th Percentile: 42
27 1 0.66% 1.32% 85th Percentile: 47
28 0 0.00% 1.32% 97th Percentile: 53
29 0 0.00% 1.32% 10 Mile Pace: 38 to 47
30 1 0.66% 1.97% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 71.05%
31 0 0.00% 1.97% Comments:
32 3 1.97% 3.95%
33 4 2.63% 6.58%
34 3 1.97% 8.55%
35 0 0.00% 8.55%
36 6 3.95% 12.50%
37 3 1.97% 14.47%
38 6 3.95% 18.42%
39 12 7.89% 26.32%
40 13 8.55% 34.87%
41 8 5.26% 40.13%
42 15 9.87% 50.00%
43 9 5.92% 55.92%
44 13 8.55% 64.47%
45 16 10.53% 75.00%
46 12 7.89% 82.89%
47 4 2.63% 85.53%
48 4 2.63% 88.16%
49 5 3.29% 91.45%
50 0 0.00% 91.45%
51 3 1.97% 93.42%
52 4 2.63% 96.05%
53 3 1.97% 98.03%
54 2 1.32% 99.34%
55 0 0.00% 99.34%
56 1 0.66% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 152 100%
spd_form.xls
11:50AM-12:20PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
505
CITY OF OXNARD 23
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/14/2022 Day: Thursday Hours: 1:50-2:10PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 40 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 45 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 35 To 44 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.26
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 20563
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2670
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 86'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Commercial
Comments
ID:
Channel Islands Blvd Harbor Bl / Victoria Ave
at Peninsula Rd
85th percentile speed
506
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Channel Islands Blvd
Location: at Peninsula Rd
Between: Harbor Bl / Victoria Ave Ref. # 23
Cumulative Date: 4/14/2022 Day: Thursday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY/AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 41
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.32
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 40
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 45
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 49
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 35 to 44
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.34%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 4 2.55% 2.55%
34 1 0.64% 3.18%
35 7 4.46% 7.64%
36 11 7.01% 14.65%
37 14 8.92% 23.57%
38 17 10.83% 34.39%
39 18 11.46% 45.86%
40 11 7.01% 52.87%
41 7 4.46% 57.32%
42 18 11.46% 68.79%
43 9 5.73% 74.52%
44 11 7.01% 81.53%
45 6 3.82% 85.35%
46 10 6.37% 91.72%
47 4 2.55% 94.27%
48 2 1.27% 95.54%
49 4 2.55% 98.09%
50 1 0.64% 98.73%
51 2 1.27% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 157 100%
spd_form.xls
1:50-2:10PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
507
CITY OF OXNARD 24
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 2:20-2:55PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 40 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 31 To 40 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 14
No. with Speed violations 3
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.97
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.67
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 26087
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2655
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 86'-60'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Commercial
Comments
ID:
Channel Islands Blvd Ventura Rd / J Street
at M Street
CVC 22358.8(a), high collision rate, keep
existing speed limit
508
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Channel Islands Blvd
Location: at M Street
Between: Ventura Rd / J Street Ref. # 24
Cumulative Date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.32
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 36
27 3 1.92% 1.92% 85th Percentile: 40
28 1 0.64% 2.56% 97th Percentile: 46
29 6 3.85% 6.41% 10 Mile Pace: 31 to 40
30 3 1.92% 8.33% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 80.13%
31 7 4.49% 12.82% Comments:
32 5 3.21% 16.03%
33 15 9.62% 25.64%
34 14 8.97% 34.62%
35 14 8.97% 43.59%
36 20 12.82% 56.41%
37 16 10.26% 66.67%
38 8 5.13% 71.79%
39 15 9.62% 81.41%
40 11 7.05% 88.46%
41 4 2.56% 91.03%
42 6 3.85% 94.87%
43 1 0.64% 95.51%
44 0 0.00% 95.51%
45 1 0.64% 96.15%
46 2 1.28% 97.44%
47 2 1.28% 98.72%
48 1 0.64% 99.36%
49 0 0.00% 99.36%
50 0 0.00% 99.36%
51 1 0.64% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 156 100%
spd_form.xls
2:20-2:55PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
509
CITY OF OXNARD 25
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 1:10-1:40PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 30 To 39 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 18
No. with Speed violations 6
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.18
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.67
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 26087
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2830
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 60'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial/ Residential
Comments
ID:
Channel Islands Blvd J Street / Saviers Rd
200 ft S of Maywood Way
CVC 22358.6, high collision rate
510
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Channel Islands Blvd
Location: 200 ft S of Maywood Way
Between: J Street / Saviers Rd Ref. # 25
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 35
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.21
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 35
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 39
28 1 0.48% 0.48% 97th Percentile: 41
29 8 3.85% 4.33% 10 Mile Pace: 30 to 39
30 8 3.85% 8.17% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 85.58%
31 7 3.37% 11.54% Comments:
32 13 6.25% 17.79%
33 30 14.42% 32.21%
34 24 11.54% 43.75%
35 16 7.69% 51.44%
36 26 12.50% 63.94%
37 23 11.06% 75.00%
38 12 5.77% 80.77%
39 19 9.13% 89.90%
40 8 3.85% 93.75%
41 7 3.37% 97.12%
42 4 1.92% 99.04%
43 1 0.48% 99.52%
44 1 0.48% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 208 100%
spd_form.xls
1:10-1:40PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
511
CITY OF OXNARD 26
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/11 & 14/2022 Day: Fri /Mon Hours: 9:30-10:00AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 32 To 41 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 12
No. with Speed violations 3
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.80
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.91
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 28451
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2530
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 68'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Commercial
Comments
ID:
Channel Islands Blvd Saviers Rd / Paula St
at Gisler Ave
CVC 22358.6
512
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Channel Islands Blvd
Location: at Gisler Ave
Between: Saviers Rd / Paula St Ref. # 26
Cumulative Date: 3/11 & 14/202Day: Fri /Mon
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.24
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 36
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 39
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 43
29 4 2.56% 2.56% 10 Mile Pace: 32 to 41
30 5 3.21% 5.77% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 85.90%
31 1 0.64% 6.41% Comments:
32 10 6.41% 12.82%
33 15 9.62% 22.44%
34 17 10.90% 33.33%
35 12 7.69% 41.03%
36 26 16.67% 57.69%
37 14 8.97% 66.67%
38 15 9.62% 76.28%
39 15 9.62% 85.90%
40 5 3.21% 89.10%
41 5 3.21% 92.31%
42 6 3.85% 96.15%
43 3 1.92% 98.08%
44 1 0.64% 98.72%
45 0 0.00% 98.72%
46 1 0.64% 99.36%
47 0 0.00% 99.36%
48 1 0.64% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 156 100%
spd_form.xls
9:30-10:00AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
513
CITY OF OXNARD 27
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 12:10-12:40PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 9
No. with Speed violations 3
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.44
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.91
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 28451
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3500
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 90'
Parking Restriction S/S
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial/ Residential
Comments
ID:
Channel Islands Blvd Paula St / Oxnard Blvd
200 ft E of Rose Ave
85th percetile speed
514
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Channel Islands Blvd
Location: 200 ft E of Rose Ave
Between: Paula St / Oxnard Blvd Ref. # 27
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 1 0.65% 0.65% Mean Speed: 38
24 0 0.00% 0.65% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.65% Standard error of the mean: 0.32
26 0 0.00% 0.65% 50th Percentile: 38
27 0 0.00% 0.65% 85th Percentile: 42
28 0 0.00% 0.65% 97th Percentile: 46
29 0 0.00% 0.65% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 1 0.65% 1.30% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 81.82%
31 1 0.65% 1.95% Comments:
32 3 1.95% 3.90%
33 8 5.19% 9.09%
34 8 5.19% 14.29%
35 13 8.44% 22.73%
36 20 12.99% 35.71%
37 12 7.79% 43.51%
38 13 8.44% 51.95%
39 13 8.44% 60.39%
40 14 9.09% 69.48%
41 11 7.14% 76.62%
42 14 9.09% 85.71%
43 8 5.19% 90.91%
44 7 4.55% 95.45%
45 2 1.30% 96.75%
46 2 1.30% 98.05%
47 1 0.65% 98.70%
48 0 0.00% 98.70%
49 1 0.65% 99.35%
50 1 0.65% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 154 100%
spd_form.xls
12:10-12:40PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
515
CITY OF OXNARD 28
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 3:00-3:40PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 40 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 45 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 36 To 45 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.22
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.17
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 14204
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4530
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 26'-60'
Parking Restriction S/S
No. Lanes and Median 1/ EB 1-2/ WB
Improvement (SW, C & G) Partial
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II/ WB
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Commercial/ Farm land
Comments No improvement w/o El Dorado Ave
Class II bike for WB between Oxnard and El Dorando
ID:
Channel Islands Blvd Oxnard Blvd / Rice Ave
at Merced Pl
CVC 22358.8(a), keep existing speed limit
516
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Channel Islands Blvd
Location: at Merced Pl
Between: Oxnard Blvd / Rice Ave Ref. # 28
Cumulative Date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 41
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.29
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 40
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 45
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 52
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 36 to 45
30 1 0.54% 0.54% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 81.08%
31 0 0.00% 0.54% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.54%
33 2 1.08% 1.62%
34 5 2.70% 4.32%
35 5 2.70% 7.03%
36 15 8.11% 15.14%
37 9 4.86% 20.00%
38 16 8.65% 28.65%
39 27 14.59% 43.24%
40 20 10.81% 54.05%
41 18 9.73% 63.78%
42 18 9.73% 73.51%
43 7 3.78% 77.30%
44 11 5.95% 83.24%
45 9 4.86% 88.11%
46 4 2.16% 90.27%
47 4 2.16% 92.43%
48 0 0.00% 92.43%
49 2 1.08% 93.51%
50 0 0.00% 93.51%
51 5 2.70% 96.22%
52 5 2.70% 98.92%
53 2 1.08% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 185 100%
spd_form.xls
3:00-3:40PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
517
CITY OF OXNARD 29
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 1:00 - 1:40P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 4
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.45
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13012
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3300
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 90'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW, no sidewalk e/s Sturgies-5th Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial and Farm Land
Comments RR crossing at 5th St
ID:
Del Norte Blvd Fifth St / Camino Del Sol
500' s of Sturgis Rd
85th percentile speed, Reduce speed limit
518
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Del Norte Blvd
Location: 500' s of Sturgis Rd
Between: Fifth St / Camino Del Sol Ref. # 29
Cumulative Date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 50 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 39
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.37
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 39
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 43
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 49
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 82.20%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 4 3.39% 3.39%
34 3 2.54% 5.93%
35 8 6.78% 12.71%
36 13 11.02% 23.73%
37 10 8.47% 32.20%
38 12 10.17% 42.37%
39 15 12.71% 55.08%
40 13 11.02% 66.10%
41 12 10.17% 76.27%
42 7 5.93% 82.20%
43 4 3.39% 85.59%
44 3 2.54% 88.14%
45 5 4.24% 92.37%
46 3 2.54% 94.92%
47 1 0.85% 95.76%
48 1 0.85% 96.61%
49 2 1.69% 98.31%
50 2 1.69% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 118 100%
spd_form.xls
1:00 - 1:40P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
519
CITY OF OXNARD 30
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 1:45 - 2:20P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 52 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 43 To 52 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.54
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13012
Traffic Control Type None
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2040
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 90'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type ClassII
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Del Norte Blvd Camino Del Sol / Lunar Ct
at Jupiter Ct
85th percentile speed
520
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Del Norte Blvd
Location: at Jupiter Ct
Between: Camino Del Sol / Lunar Ct Ref. # 30
Cumulative Date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
20 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
21 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
22 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 50 mph
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 0 0.00% 0.00%
27 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
28 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 47
29 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
30 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.31
31 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 48
32 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 52
33 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 55
34 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 43 to 52
35 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 77.84%
36 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
37 1 0.60% 0.60%
38 1 0.60% 1.20%
39 3 1.80% 2.99%
40 2 1.20% 4.19%
41 4 2.40% 6.59%
42 9 5.39% 11.98%
43 8 4.79% 16.77%
44 13 7.78% 24.55%
45 15 8.98% 33.53%
46 15 8.98% 42.51%
47 10 5.99% 48.50%
48 16 9.58% 58.08%
49 25 14.97% 73.05%
50 9 5.39% 78.44%
51 9 5.39% 83.83%
52 10 5.99% 89.82%
53 7 4.19% 94.01%
54 2 1.20% 95.21%
55 3 1.80% 97.01%
56 1 0.60% 97.60%
57 1 0.60% 98.20%
58 0 0.00% 98.20%
59 2 1.20% 99.40%
60 1 0.60% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 167 100%
spd_form.xls
1:45 - 2:20P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
521
CITY OF OXNARD 31
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 2:30 - 3:05P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 53 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 43 To 52 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.20
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 12557
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3900
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 75'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) None
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Farm Land
Comments
ID:
Del Norte Blvd Lunar Ct / Hwy 101
at Sakikoa Dr
CVC 22358.6
522
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Del Norte Blvd
Location: at Sakikoa Dr
Between: Lunar Ct / Hwy 101 Ref. # 31
Cumulative Date: 3/25/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
20 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
21 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
22 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 50 mph
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 0 0.00% 0.00%
27 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
28 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 49
29 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
30 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.33
31 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 49
32 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 53
33 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 58
34 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 43 to 52
35 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 75.50%
36 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
37 0 0.00% 0.00%
38 0 0.00% 0.00%
39 2 1.32% 1.32%
40 3 1.99% 3.31%
41 2 1.32% 4.64%
42 5 3.31% 7.95%
43 6 3.97% 11.92%
44 9 5.96% 17.88%
45 10 6.62% 24.50%
46 13 8.61% 33.11%
47 11 7.28% 40.40%
48 11 7.28% 47.68%
49 24 15.89% 63.58%
50 9 5.96% 69.54%
51 13 8.61% 78.15%
52 8 5.30% 83.44%
53 3 1.99% 85.43%
54 7 4.64% 90.07%
55 3 1.99% 92.05%
56 6 3.97% 96.03%
57 0 0.00% 96.03%
58 2 1.32% 97.35%
59 2 1.32% 98.68%
60 1 0.66% 99.34%
61 1 0.66% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 151 100%
spd_form.xls
2:30 - 3:05P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
523
CITY OF OXNARD 32
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday Hours: 12:55-1:25PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 45 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 40 To 49 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.17
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal/ stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4000
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 60'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ WB, 1/EB
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW on N/S, None on S/S
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II /WB
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential N/S & Farm land S/S
Comments
ID:
Doris Ave Patterson Rd / Ventura Rd
at Coronado Pl
CVC 22358.6
524
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Doris Ave
Location: at Coronado Pl
Between: Patterson Rd / Ventura Rd Ref. # 32
Cumulative Date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 45
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 45
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 49
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 55
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 40 to 49
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 76.52%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 0 0.00% 0.00%
36 3 2.27% 2.27%
37 4 3.03% 5.30%
38 2 1.52% 6.82%
39 5 3.79% 10.61%
40 6 4.55% 15.15%
41 10 7.58% 22.73%
42 9 6.82% 29.55%
43 11 8.33% 37.88%
44 14 10.61% 48.48%
45 16 12.12% 60.61%
46 15 11.36% 71.97%
47 5 3.79% 75.76%
48 6 4.55% 80.30%
49 9 6.82% 87.12%
50 3 2.27% 89.39%
51 3 2.27% 91.67%
52 5 3.79% 95.45%
53 1 0.76% 96.21%
54 0 0.00% 96.21%
55 3 2.27% 98.48%
56 2 1.52% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 132 100%
spd_form.xls
12:55-1:25PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
525
CITY OF OXNARD 33
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/17/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:50 - 3:30P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 30 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 34 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 25 To 34 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 5
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.19
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal/ Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2900
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (Ventura /M St) Road Width 50'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction, no median
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential / Commercial
Comments
ID:
Doris Ave Ventura Rd / F Street
between M St & H St
CVC 22358.8(a), high collison rate, keep
existing speed limit
526
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Doris Ave
Location: between M St & H St
Between: Ventura Rd / F Street Ref. # 33
Cumulative Date: 5/17/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 2 1.44% 1.44% Mean Speed: 30
24 3 2.16% 3.60% Standard Deviation: 3
25 9 6.47% 10.07% Standard error of the mean: 0.25
26 10 7.19% 17.27% 50th Percentile: 30
27 8 5.76% 23.02% 85th Percentile: 34
28 13 9.35% 32.37% 97th Percentile: 36
29 14 10.07% 42.45% 10 Mile Pace: 25 to 34
30 25 17.99% 60.43% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 86.33% 31 10 7.19% 67.63% Comments:
32 6 4.32% 71.94%
33 15 10.79% 82.73%
34 10 7.19% 89.93%
35 5 3.60% 93.53%
36 5 3.60% 97.12%
37 1 0.72% 97.84%
38 2 1.44% 99.28%
39 0 0.00% 99.28%
40 1 0.72% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 139 100%
spd_form.xls
2:50 - 3:30P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
527
CITY OF OXNARD 34
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/17/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 10:50-11:10A /1:45-2 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 26 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 30 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 23 To 32 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.05
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal/ Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2750
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 50'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction, no median
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
E Street Wooley Rd / Fifth St
at Seventh St
Cvc 22358.8(a), hight collision rate, keep
existing speed limit
528
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: E Street
Location: at Seventh St
Between: Wooley Rd / Fifth St Ref. # 34
Cumulative Date: 5/17/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 1 1.52% 1.52% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 1.52%
20 0 0.00% 1.52%
21 5 7.58% 9.09%
22 1 1.52% 10.61% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 9 13.64% 24.24% Mean Speed: 26
24 3 4.55% 28.79% Standard Deviation: 3
25 5 7.58% 36.36% Standard error of the mean: 0.37
26 11 16.67% 53.03% 50th Percentile: 26
27 8 12.12% 65.15% 85th Percentile: 30
28 6 9.09% 74.24% 97th Percentile: 33
29 5 7.58% 81.82% 10 Mile Pace: 23 to 32
30 3 4.55% 86.36% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 86.36%
31 3 4.55% 90.91% Comments:
32 4 6.06% 96.97%
33 2 3.03% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 66 100%
spd_form.xls
10:50-11:10A /1:45-2:40P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
529
CITY OF OXNARD 35
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 9:50-10:35AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 32 To 41 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type None
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2000
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 48'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Eastman Ave Lombard St / Rice Ave
at 2340 Eastman Ave
85th percentile speed
530
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Eastman Ave
Location: at 2340 Eastman Ave
Between: Lombard St / Rice Ave Ref. # 35
Cumulative Date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 38
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 1 0.88% 0.88% Standard error of the mean: 0.47
26 2 1.75% 2.63% 50th Percentile: 37
27 0 0.00% 2.63% 85th Percentile: 42
28 0 0.00% 2.63% 97th Percentile: 47
29 0 0.00% 2.63% 10 Mile Pace: 32 to 41
30 3 2.63% 5.26% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 73.68%
31 1 0.88% 6.14% Comments:
32 7 6.14% 12.28%
33 7 6.14% 18.42%
34 3 2.63% 21.05%
35 9 7.89% 28.95%
36 15 13.16% 42.11%
37 10 8.77% 50.88%
38 5 4.39% 55.26%
39 12 10.53% 65.79%
40 10 8.77% 74.56%
41 6 5.26% 79.82%
42 7 6.14% 85.96%
43 2 1.75% 87.72%
44 6 5.26% 92.98%
45 1 0.88% 93.86%
46 3 2.63% 96.49%
47 1 0.88% 97.37%
48 1 0.88% 98.25%
49 2 1.75% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 114 100%
spd_form.xls
9:50-10:35AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
531
CITY OF OXNARD 36
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 9:15-9:45AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 4
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.17
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type None
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3300
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 48'-50'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Eastman Ave Rose Ave / Lombard St
at Hearst Dr
CVC 22358.6, high collision rate
532
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Eastman Ave
Location: at Hearst Dr
Between: Rose Ave / Lombard St Ref. # 36
Cumulative Date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 38
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 1 0.87% 0.87% Standard error of the mean: 0.37
26 0 0.00% 0.87% 50th Percentile: 38
27 1 0.87% 1.74% 85th Percentile: 43
28 0 0.00% 1.74% 97th Percentile: 46
29 0 0.00% 1.74% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 1 0.87% 2.61% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 79.13%
31 1 0.87% 3.48% Comments:
32 2 1.74% 5.22%
33 8 6.96% 12.17%
34 5 4.35% 16.52%
35 10 8.70% 25.22%
36 9 7.83% 33.04%
37 11 9.57% 42.61%
38 14 12.17% 54.78%
39 12 10.43% 65.22%
40 8 6.96% 72.17%
41 6 5.22% 77.39%
42 8 6.96% 84.35%
43 5 4.35% 88.70%
44 3 2.61% 91.30%
45 2 1.74% 93.04%
46 5 4.35% 97.39%
47 2 1.74% 99.13%
48 0 0.00% 99.13%
49 0 0.00% 99.13%
50 1 0.87% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 115 100%
spd_form.xls
9:15-9:45AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
533
CITY OF OXNARD 37
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:30-3:10PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1560
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 60'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) None
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Emerson Ave Pacific Ave / Rose Ave
at Statham Blvd
85th percentile speed
534
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Emerson Ave
Location: at Statham Blvd
Between: Pacific Ave / Rose Ave Ref. # 37
Cumulative Date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 38
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.28
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 38
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 41
28 1 0.84% 0.84% 97th Percentile: 43
29 1 0.84% 1.68% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 0 0.00% 1.68% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 87.39%
31 2 1.68% 3.36% Comments:
32 4 3.36% 6.72%
33 10 8.40% 15.13%
34 2 1.68% 16.81%
35 5 4.20% 21.01%
36 18 15.13% 36.13%
37 12 10.08% 46.22%
38 11 9.24% 55.46%
39 21 17.65% 73.11%
40 3 2.52% 75.63%
41 12 10.08% 85.71%
42 10 8.40% 94.12%
43 4 3.36% 97.48%
44 1 0.84% 98.32%
45 0 0.00% 98.32%
46 1 0.84% 99.16%
47 1 0.84% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 119 100%
spd_form.xls
2:30-3:10PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
535
CITY OF OXNARD 38
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:15-3:55PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3300
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 24'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW on S/S only
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Farm Land
Comments
ID:
Emerson Ave Rose Ave / El Dorado Ave
at Dupont St
85th percentile speed
536
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Emerson Ave
Location: at Dupont St
Between: Rose Ave / El Dorado Ave Ref. # 38
Cumulative Date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 38
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.38
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 38
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 42
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 44
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 1 0.93% 0.93% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 88.89%
31 2 1.85% 2.78% Comments:
32 1 0.93% 3.70%
33 7 6.48% 10.19%
34 10 9.26% 19.44%
35 5 4.63% 24.07%
36 13 12.04% 36.11%
37 11 10.19% 46.30%
38 8 7.41% 53.70%
39 13 12.04% 65.74%
40 12 11.11% 76.85%
41 6 5.56% 82.41%
42 11 10.19% 92.59%
43 3 2.78% 95.37%
44 2 1.85% 97.22%
45 0 0.00% 97.22%
46 2 1.85% 99.07%
47 0 0.00% 99.07%
48 0 0.00% 99.07%
49 0 0.00% 99.07%
50 1 0.93% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 108 100%
spd_form.xls
3:15-3:55PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
537
CITY OF OXNARD 39
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 3:30-4:10PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 29 Existing Speed Zone None 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 34 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 24 To 33 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2300
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 24'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) None
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type Uncontrolled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Farm Land
Comments Laguna Vista Elementary school
School crosswalk (uncontrolled)
ID:
Etting Rd Pleasant Valley Rd / East City Limits
at Olds Rd
CVC 22358.6
538
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Etting Rd
Location: at Olds Rd
Between: Pleasant Valley Rd / East City Limits Ref. # 39 Cumulative Date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: None
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 1 1.00% 1.00%
21 1 1.00% 2.00%
22 0 0.00% 2.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 1 1.00% 3.00% Mean Speed: 30
24 4 4.00% 7.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 8 8.00% 15.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.4
26 7 7.00% 22.00% 50th Percentile: 29
27 9 9.00% 31.00% 85th Percentile: 34
28 13 13.00% 44.00% 97th Percentile: 38
29 13 13.00% 57.00% 10 Mile Pace: 24 to 33
30 5 5.00% 62.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 81.00%
31 5 5.00% 67.00% Comments:
32 8 8.00% 75.00%
33 9 9.00% 84.00%
34 4 4.00% 88.00%
35 4 4.00% 92.00%
36 3 3.00% 95.00%
37 1 1.00% 96.00%
38 2 2.00% 98.00%
39 1 1.00% 99.00%
40 1 1.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 100 100%
spd_form.xls
3:30-4:10PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
539
CITY OF OXNARD 40
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:35 -4:10P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 44 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 40 To 49 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88.3%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 16
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.68
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 14364
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 7920
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (Patterson/Ventura) Road Width 89'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Airport/ Park/ School
Comments Juan Lagunas Sori Elem School no crosswalk
ID:
Fifth Street Victoria Ave / Ventura Rd
300' w of Patterson Rd
CVC 22358.6
540
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Fifth Street
Location: 300' w of Patterson Rd
Between: Victoria Ave / Ventura Rd Ref. # 40
Cumulative Date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 45
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.28
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 44
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 48
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 51
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 40 to 49
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 88.29%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 0 0.00% 0.00%
36 0 0.00% 0.00%
37 1 0.90% 0.90%
38 2 1.80% 2.70%
39 2 1.80% 4.50%
40 4 3.60% 8.11%
41 3 2.70% 10.81%
42 14 12.61% 23.42%
43 14 12.61% 36.04%
44 17 15.32% 51.35%
45 11 9.91% 61.26%
46 18 16.22% 77.48%
47 5 4.50% 81.98%
48 5 4.50% 86.49%
49 7 6.31% 92.79%
50 2 1.80% 94.59%
51 3 2.70% 97.30%
52 1 0.90% 98.20%
53 0 0.00% 98.20%
54 1 0.90% 99.10%
55 0 0.00% 99.10%
56 1 0.90% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 111 100%
spd_form.xls
3:35 -4:10P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
541
CITY OF OXNARD 41
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 6/29/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 9:00 -9:30A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 30 To 39 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.3%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.18
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.17
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13152
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4150
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (D St/ C St)
Road Width 79'-61'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2-1 /direction, Raised/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
Fifth Street Ventura Rd / C Street
at Hobson / F St
CVC 22358.8(a), keep existing speed limit
542
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Fifth Street
Location: at Hobson / F St
Between: Ventura Rd / C Street Ref. # 41
Cumulative Date: 6/29/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.37
26 1 0.83% 0.83% 50th Percentile: 36
27 0 0.00% 0.83% 85th Percentile: 41
28 2 1.67% 2.50% 97th Percentile: 44
29 0 0.00% 2.50% 10 Mile Pace: 30 to 39
30 4 3.33% 5.83% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.33%
31 7 5.83% 11.67% Comments:
32 6 5.00% 16.67%
33 5 4.17% 20.83%
34 9 7.50% 28.33%
35 12 10.00% 38.33%
36 16 13.33% 51.67%
37 12 10.00% 61.67%
38 13 10.83% 72.50%
39 10 8.33% 80.83%
40 4 3.33% 84.17%
41 4 3.33% 87.50%
42 7 5.83% 93.33%
43 3 2.50% 95.83%
44 3 2.50% 98.33%
45 2 1.67% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 120 100%
spd_form.xls
9:00 -9:30A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
543
CITY OF OXNARD 42
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 11:50AM-12:10PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 28 To 37 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75.9%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.19
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13152
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1965
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (C St/ A St)
Road Width 61'
Parking Restriction Yes, Diagonal parking allowed
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments
ID:
Fifth St Oxnard Blvd / RR Tracks
at Meta St
85th percentile speed
544
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Fifth St
Location: at Meta St
Between: Oxnard Blvd / RR Tracks Ref. # 42
Cumulative Date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 1 0.69% 0.69% Mean Speed: 33
24 2 1.38% 2.07% Standard Deviation: 4
25 2 1.38% 3.45% Standard error of the mean: 0.33
26 5 3.45% 6.90% 50th Percentile: 33
27 5 3.45% 10.34% 85th Percentile: 37
28 9 6.21% 16.55% 97th Percentile: 40
29 11 7.59% 24.14% 10 Mile Pace: 28 to 37
30 14 9.66% 33.79% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 75.86% 31 9 6.21% 40.00% Comments:
32 13 8.97% 48.97%
33 20 13.79% 62.76%
34 8 5.52% 68.28%
35 9 6.21% 74.48%
36 10 6.90% 81.38%
37 7 4.83% 86.21%
38 7 4.83% 91.03%
39 3 2.07% 93.10%
40 6 4.14% 97.24%
41 1 0.69% 97.93%
42 1 0.69% 98.62%
43 0 0.00% 98.62%
44 2 1.38% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 145 100%
spd_form.xls
11:50AM-12:10PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
545
CITY OF OXNARD 43
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 12:13-12:33PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 40 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 35 To 44 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13277
Traffic Control Type None
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1650
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal
Road Width 61'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Painted
Improvement (SW, C & G) Partial
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial/ RR tracks
Comments
ID:
Fifth St RR Tracks / Richmond Ave
W of Richmond Ave
CVC 22358.8(a), railroad crossing, keep
existing speed limit
546
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Fifth St
Location: W of Richmond Ave
Between: RR Tracks / Richmond Ave Ref. # 43
Cumulative Date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 40
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.41
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 40
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 46
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 51
29 1 0.67% 0.67% 10 Mile Pace: 35 to 44
30 0 0.00% 0.67% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 71.81%
31 3 2.01% 2.68% Comments:
32 3 2.01% 4.70%
33 6 4.03% 8.72%
34 2 1.34% 10.07%
35 5 3.36% 13.42%
36 11 7.38% 20.81%
37 11 7.38% 28.19%
38 14 9.40% 37.58%
39 16 10.74% 48.32%
40 16 10.74% 59.06%
41 14 9.40% 68.46%
42 10 6.71% 75.17%
43 3 2.01% 77.18%
44 7 4.70% 81.88%
45 4 2.68% 84.56%
46 6 4.03% 88.59%
47 10 6.71% 95.30%
48 1 0.67% 95.97%
49 0 0.00% 95.97%
50 1 0.67% 96.64%
51 1 0.67% 97.32%
52 1 0.67% 97.99%
53 3 2.01% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 149 100%
spd_form.xls
12:13-12:33PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
547
CITY OF OXNARD 44
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 12:37-12:55P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 31 To 40 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.25
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.17
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13277
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2950
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (road tighten) Road Width 61'-32'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 2-1/ direction/ Painted
Improvement (SW, C & G) None
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial/ RR tracks
Comments
ID:
Fifth St Richmond Ave / Rose Ave
E of Diez
CVC 22358.8(a), railroad crossing, keep
existing speed limit
548
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Fifth St
Location: E of Diez
Between: Richmond Ave / Rose Ave Ref. # 44
Cumulative Date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 1 0.72% 0.72% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.72% Standard Deviation: 5
25 1 0.72% 1.44% Standard error of the mean: 0.42
26 2 1.44% 2.88% 50th Percentile: 36
27 1 0.72% 3.60% 85th Percentile: 41
28 2 1.44% 5.04% 97th Percentile: 47
29 2 1.44% 6.47% 10 Mile Pace: 31 to 40
30 2 1.44% 7.91% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 74.82%
31 8 5.76% 13.67% Comments:
32 8 5.76% 19.42%
33 11 7.91% 27.34%
34 12 8.63% 35.97%
35 10 7.19% 43.17%
36 14 10.07% 53.24%
37 11 7.91% 61.15%
38 10 7.19% 68.35%
39 12 8.63% 76.98%
40 8 5.76% 82.73%
41 4 2.88% 85.61%
42 6 4.32% 89.93%
43 3 2.16% 92.09%
44 1 0.72% 92.81%
45 1 0.72% 93.53%
46 3 2.16% 95.68%
47 3 2.16% 97.84%
48 2 1.44% 99.28%
49 1 0.72% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 139 100%
spd_form.xls
12:37-12:55P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
549
CITY OF OXNARD 45
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 1:00-1:20PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Existing Speed Zone 55 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 55 Proposed Speed Zone 55 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 45 To 54 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 61%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 7
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.48
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13277
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 5275
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 40'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) None
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Farm land/ RR tracks
Comments
ID:
Fifth St Rose Ave / Rice Ave
2000 ft E of Rose Ave
85th percentile speed
550
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Fifth St
Location: 2000 ft E of Rose Ave
Between: Rose Ave / Rice Ave Ref. # 45
Cumulative Date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
20 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
21 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
22 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 55 mph
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00%
26 0 0.00% 0.00%
27 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
28 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 49
29 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 6
30 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.49
31 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 49
32 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 55
33 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 59
34 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 45 to 54
35 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 61.07%
36 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
37 3 2.01% 2.01%
38 5 3.36% 5.37%
39 2 1.34% 6.71%
40 5 3.36% 10.07%
41 0 0.00% 10.07%
42 3 2.01% 12.08%
43 10 6.71% 18.79%
44 3 2.01% 20.81%
45 7 4.70% 25.50%
46 15 10.07% 35.57%
47 6 4.03% 39.60%
48 9 6.04% 45.64%
49 15 10.07% 55.70%
50 5 3.36% 59.06%
51 7 4.70% 63.76%
52 12 8.05% 71.81%
53 9 6.04% 77.85%
54 6 4.03% 81.88%
55 7 4.70% 86.58%
56 7 4.70% 91.28%
57 5 3.36% 94.63%
58 2 1.34% 95.97%
59 5 3.36% 99.33%
60 0 0.00% 99.33%
61 0 0.00% 99.33%
62 0 0.00% 99.33%
63 0 0.00% 99.33%
66 1 0.67% 100.00%
Total: 149 100%
spd_form.xls
1:00-1:20PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
551
CITY OF OXNARD 46
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 1:25-1:40PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 52 Existing Speed Zone None 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 56 Proposed Speed Zone 55 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 47 To 56 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 62%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 5
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.41
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13277
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4450
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 40'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) None
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Farm Land/ RR tracks
Comments
Dirt shoulder
ID:
Fifth St Rice Ave / Del Norte Blvd
2500 ft E of Rice Ave
85th percentile speed
552
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Fifth St
Location: 2500 ft E of Rice Ave
Between: Rice Ave / Del Norte Blvd Ref. # 46
Cumulative Date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
26 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
27 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: None
28 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
29 0 0.00% 0.00%
30 0 0.00% 0.00%
31 0 0.00% 0.00%
32 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
33 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 51
34 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 6
35 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.51
36 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 52
37 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 56
38 1 0.72% 0.72% 97th Percentile: 63
39 1 0.72% 1.44% 10 Mile Pace: 47 to 56
40 2 1.44% 2.88% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 61.87%
41 6 4.32% 7.19% Comments:
42 3 2.16% 9.35%
43 2 1.44% 10.79%
44 4 2.88% 13.67%
45 4 2.88% 16.55%
46 10 7.19% 23.74%
47 8 5.76% 29.50%
48 10 7.19% 36.69%
49 7 5.04% 41.73%
50 6 4.32% 46.04%
51 3 2.16% 48.20%
52 15 10.79% 58.99%
53 7 5.04% 64.03%
54 8 5.76% 69.78%
55 8 5.76% 75.54%
56 14 10.07% 85.61%
57 3 2.16% 87.77%
58 2 1.44% 89.21%
59 4 2.88% 92.09%
60 3 2.16% 94.24%
61 3 2.16% 96.40%
62 0 0.00% 96.40%
63 1 0.72% 97.12%
64 1 0.72% 97.84%
65 1 0.72% 98.56%
66 0 0.00% 98.56%
67 0 0.00% 98.56%
68 2 1.44% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 139 100%
spd_form.xls
1:25-1:40PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
553
CITY OF OXNARD 47
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/22 & 5/18 Day: Fri / Wed Hours: 2:10-3:00P / 8:20-8:5 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 28 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 24 To 33 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.65
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 4000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1850
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (at Frankfort) Road Width 36'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ High school/ Park
Comments Channel Islnds High school, uncontrolled crosswalk ID:
Gary Dr Albany Dr / Rose Ave
at Boston Dr
CVC 22358.6
554
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gary Dr
Location: at Boston Dr
Between: Albany Dr / Rose Ave Ref. # 47
Cumulative Date: 4/22 & 5/18 Day: Fri/Wed
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY/EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 3 3.00% 3.00%
22 3 3.00% 6.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 2 2.00% 8.00% Mean Speed: 29
24 4 4.00% 12.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 6 6.00% 18.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.4
26 13 13.00% 31.00% 50th Percentile: 28
27 12 12.00% 43.00% 85th Percentile: 33
28 12 12.00% 55.00% 97th Percentile: 39
29 9 9.00% 64.00% 10 Mile Pace: 24 to 33
30 6 6.00% 70.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 79.00%
31 9 9.00% 79.00% Comments:
32 5 5.00% 84.00%
33 3 3.00% 87.00%
34 3 3.00% 90.00%
35 1 1.00% 91.00%
36 3 3.00% 94.00%
37 1 1.00% 95.00%
38 0 0.00% 95.00%
39 3 3.00% 98.00%
40 1 1.00% 99.00%
41 1 1.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 100 100%
spd_form.xls
2:10-3:00P / 8:20-8:55A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
555
CITY OF OXNARD 48
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 11:17-11:35AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 44 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 40 To 49 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76.2%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.14
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 15883
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2130
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 84'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Farm land/ High school
Comments
ID:
Gonzales Rd Victoria Ave / Merion Way
300 ft W of Merion Way
CVC 22358.6
556
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gonzales Rd
Location: 300 ft W of Merion Way
Between: Victoria Ave / Merion Way Ref. # 48
Cumulative Date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: DR /JR
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 44
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.36
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 44
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 49
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 53
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 40 to 49
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 76.19%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 3 2.38% 2.38%
36 2 1.59% 3.97%
37 2 1.59% 5.56%
38 3 2.38% 7.94%
39 7 5.56% 13.49%
40 9 7.14% 20.63%
41 9 7.14% 27.78%
42 13 10.32% 38.10%
43 14 11.11% 49.21%
44 6 4.76% 53.97%
45 9 7.14% 61.11%
46 13 10.32% 71.43%
47 9 7.14% 78.57%
48 5 3.97% 82.54%
49 9 7.14% 89.68%
50 2 1.59% 91.27%
51 3 2.38% 93.65%
52 3 2.38% 96.03%
53 4 3.17% 99.21%
54 0 0.00% 99.21%
55 1 0.79% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 126 100%
spd_form.xls
11:17-11:35AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
557
CITY OF OXNARD 49
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 11:40-11:55AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 38 To 47 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.5%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.29
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 15883
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2120
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 84'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction /Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Fam Land/ High school/ Elem school Comments Oxnard High school crosswalk controlled
Thurgood Marshall Elem crosswalk controlled
ID:
Gonzales Rd Merion Way / Patterson Rd
300' e/o Campus
CVC 22358.6
558
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gonzales Rd
Location: 300' e/o Campus
Between: Merion Way / Patterson Rd Ref. # 49
Cumulative Date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: DR /JR
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 44
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 43
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 48
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 54
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 38 to 47
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 79.55%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 1 0.76% 0.76%
36 2 1.52% 2.27%
37 1 0.76% 3.03%
38 8 6.06% 9.09%
39 9 6.82% 15.91%
40 7 5.30% 21.21%
41 11 8.33% 29.55%
42 11 8.33% 37.88%
43 16 12.12% 50.00%
44 13 9.85% 59.85%
45 10 7.58% 67.42%
46 13 9.85% 77.27%
47 7 5.30% 82.58%
48 7 5.30% 87.88%
49 4 3.03% 90.91%
50 3 2.27% 93.18%
51 3 2.27% 95.45%
52 1 0.76% 96.21%
53 0 0.00% 96.21%
54 3 2.27% 98.48%
55 0 0.00% 98.48%
56 0 0.00% 98.48%
57 1 0.76% 99.24%
58 1 0.76% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 132 100%
spd_form.xls
11:40-11:55AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
559
CITY OF OXNARD 50
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:08-3:25pm 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 38 To 47 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83.1%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.09
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 14741
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3790
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 80'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
Gonzales Rd Patterson Rd / Ventura Rd
E of Gallatin Pl
85th percentile speed
560
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gonzales Rd
Location: E of Gallatin Pl
Between: Patterson Rd / Ventura Rd Ref. # 50
Cumulative Date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 43
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 43
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 46
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 49
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 38 to 47
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 83.06%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 2 1.09% 1.09%
34 1 0.55% 1.64%
35 1 0.55% 2.19%
36 5 2.73% 4.92%
37 4 2.19% 7.10%
38 11 6.01% 13.11%
39 16 8.74% 21.86%
40 11 6.01% 27.87%
41 12 6.56% 34.43%
42 21 11.48% 45.90%
43 19 10.38% 56.28%
44 18 9.84% 66.12%
45 20 10.93% 77.05%
46 17 9.29% 86.34%
47 7 3.83% 90.16%
48 7 3.83% 93.99%
49 6 3.28% 97.27%
50 2 1.09% 98.36%
51 1 0.55% 98.91%
52 1 0.55% 99.45%
53 0 0.00% 99.45%
54 0 0.00% 99.45%
55 0 0.00% 99.45%
56 0 0.00% 99.45%
57 1 0.55% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 183 100%
spd_form.xls
3:08-3:25pm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
561
CITY OF OXNARD 51
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:45-3:02PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 34 To 43 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73.1%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 10
No. with Speed violations 4
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.64
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 30360
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2480
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (Ventura/Lobelia Dr) Road Width 80'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Commercial
Comments
ID:
Gonzales Rd Ventura Rd / H St
at Lantana St
CVC 22358.6, Reduce speed limit
562
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gonzales Rd
Location: at Lantana St
Between: Ventura Rd / H St Ref. # 51
Cumulative Date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 38
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.4
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 38
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 43
28 2 1.28% 1.28% 97th Percentile: 48
29 3 1.92% 3.21% 10 Mile Pace: 34 to 43
30 5 3.21% 6.41% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 73.08%
31 7 4.49% 10.90% Comments:
32 2 1.28% 12.18%
33 5 3.21% 15.38%
34 7 4.49% 19.87%
35 9 5.77% 25.64%
36 16 10.26% 35.90%
37 11 7.05% 42.95%
38 11 7.05% 50.00%
39 19 12.18% 62.18%
40 10 6.41% 68.59%
41 10 6.41% 75.00%
42 12 7.69% 82.69%
43 9 5.77% 88.46%
44 2 1.28% 89.74%
45 6 3.85% 93.59%
46 5 3.21% 96.79%
47 0 0.00% 96.79%
48 1 0.64% 97.44%
49 3 1.92% 99.36%
50 0 0.00% 99.36%
51 1 0.64% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 156 100%
spd_form.xls
2:45-3:02PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
563
CITY OF OXNARD 52
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:20-2:40PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 19
No. with Speed violations 8
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.09
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 30360
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2775
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (C St/ Oxnard) Road Width 80'-100'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2-3/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW, No sidewalk S/S between Frontage/Dover St Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Commercial
Comments
ID:
Gonzales Rd H St / Oxnard Blvd
at Ginger St
CVC 22358.6, high collision rate, reduce
speed limit
564
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gonzales Rd
Location: at Ginger St
Between: H St / Oxnard Blvd Ref. # 52
Cumulative Date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 39
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 39
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 43
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 47
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 1 0.58% 0.58% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 80.92%
31 0 0.00% 0.58% Comments:
32 3 1.73% 2.31%
33 10 5.78% 8.09%
34 3 1.73% 9.83%
35 10 5.78% 15.61%
36 20 11.56% 27.17%
37 14 8.09% 35.26%
38 9 5.20% 40.46%
39 32 18.50% 58.96%
40 15 8.67% 67.63%
41 11 6.36% 73.99%
42 16 9.25% 83.24%
43 7 4.05% 87.28%
44 6 3.47% 90.75%
45 4 2.31% 93.06%
46 5 2.89% 95.95%
47 2 1.16% 97.11%
48 1 0.58% 97.69%
49 2 1.16% 98.84%
50 0 0.00% 98.84%
51 1 0.58% 99.42%
52 1 0.58% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 173 100%
spd_form.xls
2:20-2:40PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
565
CITY OF OXNARD 53
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:03-2:15PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 39 To 48 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 9
No. with Speed violations 4
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.34
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 36169
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3540
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 125'-100'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Farm land
Comments RR crossing at Oxnard Blvd.
Pacific High school crosswalk controlled
ID:
Gonzales Rd Oxnard Blvd / Snow Ave
at Indiana Dr
85th percentile speed
566
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gonzales Rd
Location: at Indiana Dr
Between: Oxnard Blvd / Snow Ave Ref. # 53
Cumulative Date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 43
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 43
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 46
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 50
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 39 to 48
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 82.97%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 1 0.55% 0.55%
34 0 0.00% 0.55%
35 1 0.55% 1.10%
36 8 4.40% 5.49%
37 3 1.65% 7.14%
38 6 3.30% 10.44%
39 8 4.40% 14.84%
40 11 6.04% 20.88%
41 17 9.34% 30.22%
42 33 18.13% 48.35%
43 17 9.34% 57.69%
44 20 10.99% 68.68%
45 16 8.79% 77.47%
46 17 9.34% 86.81%
47 5 2.75% 89.56%
48 7 3.85% 93.41%
49 3 1.65% 95.05%
50 4 2.20% 97.25%
51 0 0.00% 97.25%
52 3 1.65% 98.90%
53 1 0.55% 99.45%
54 0 0.00% 99.45%
55 0 0.00% 99.45%
56 0 0.00% 99.45%
57 1 0.55% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 182 100%
spd_form.xls
2:03-2:15PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
567
CITY OF OXNARD 54
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 1:42-2:00PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 47 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 38 To 47 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 7
No. with Speed violations 3
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.44
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 36169
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2100
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 100'-105'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/ direction(#1 land to left turn E/B to Rose N/B)/ Raised Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Commercial
Comments
ID:
Gonzales Rd Snow Ave / Rose Ave
at Almanor St
85th percentile speed
568
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gonzales Rd
Location: at Almanor St
Between: Snow Ave / Rose Ave Ref. # 54
Cumulative Date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 42
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.31
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 42
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 47
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 51
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 38 to 47
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.40%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 2 1.23% 1.23%
35 2 1.23% 2.47%
36 7 4.32% 6.79%
37 5 3.09% 9.88%
38 7 4.32% 14.20%
39 18 11.11% 25.31%
40 16 9.88% 35.19%
41 18 11.11% 46.30%
42 16 9.88% 56.17%
43 9 5.56% 61.73%
44 14 8.64% 70.37%
45 10 6.17% 76.54%
46 11 6.79% 83.33%
47 8 4.94% 88.27%
48 5 3.09% 91.36%
49 9 5.56% 96.91%
50 0 0.00% 96.91%
51 2 1.23% 98.15%
52 1 0.62% 98.77%
53 1 0.62% 99.38%
54 1 0.62% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 162 100%
spd_form.xls
1:42-2:00PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
569
CITY OF OXNARD 55
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 1:13-1:30PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 47 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 38 To 47 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.15
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 23271
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2710
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 105'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial/ Industrial/ Residential
Comments
ID:
Gonzales Rd Rose Ave / Lombard St
at Williams Dr
85th percentile speed
570
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gonzales Rd
Location: at Williams Dr
Between: Rose Ave / Lombard St Ref. # 55
Cumulative Date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 42
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 42
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 47
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 50
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 38 to 47
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 81.32%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 2 1.10% 1.10%
34 0 0.00% 1.10%
35 2 1.10% 2.20%
36 8 4.40% 6.59%
37 4 2.20% 8.79%
38 10 5.49% 14.29%
39 24 13.19% 27.47%
40 14 7.69% 35.16%
41 12 6.59% 41.76%
42 28 15.38% 57.14%
43 13 7.14% 64.29%
44 15 8.24% 72.53%
45 5 2.75% 75.27%
46 15 8.24% 83.52%
47 12 6.59% 90.11%
48 6 3.30% 93.41%
49 5 2.75% 96.15%
50 3 1.65% 97.80%
51 1 0.55% 98.35%
52 2 1.10% 99.45%
53 0 0.00% 99.45%
54 0 0.00% 99.45%
55 0 0.00% 99.45%
56 0 0.00% 99.45%
57 0 0.00% 99.45%
58 1 0.55% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 182 100%
spd_form.xls
1:13-1:30PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
571
CITY OF OXNARD 56
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 12:45-1:05PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 38 To 47 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.7%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 5
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.47
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 23271
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2200
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 105'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Gonzales Rd Lombard St / Rice Ave
w/o Solar Dr
85th percentile speed
572
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Gonzales Rd
Location: w/o Solar Dr
Between: Lombard St / Rice Ave Ref. # 56
Cumulative Date: 3/29/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY/AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 42
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 42
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 46
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 52
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 38 to 47
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.65%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 1 0.56% 0.56%
33 1 0.56% 1.12%
34 1 0.56% 1.69%
35 5 2.81% 4.49%
36 8 4.49% 8.99%
37 6 3.37% 12.36%
38 7 3.93% 16.29%
39 22 12.36% 28.65%
40 11 6.18% 34.83%
41 15 8.43% 43.26%
42 22 12.36% 55.62%
43 5 2.81% 58.43%
44 17 9.55% 67.98%
45 16 8.99% 76.97%
46 15 8.43% 85.39%
47 10 5.62% 91.01%
48 4 2.25% 93.26%
49 2 1.12% 94.38%
50 1 0.56% 94.94%
51 3 1.69% 96.63%
52 1 0.56% 97.19%
53 3 1.69% 98.88%
54 1 0.56% 99.44%
55 0 0.00% 99.44%
56 0 0.00% 99.44%
57 1 0.56% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 178 100%
spd_form.xls
12:45-1:05PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
573
CITY OF OXNARD 57
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/5/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 10:18-10:55A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 32 To 41 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68.2%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2775
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Camino Del Sol/ Celsius) Road Width 48'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW, no sidewalk E/S 275' S of Latigo Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial/ Residential
Comments
ID:
Graves Avenue Celsius Ave / Latigo Ave
200' w/o Camino Del Sol
85th percentile speed
574
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Graves Avenue
Location: 200' w/o Camino Del Sol
Between: Celsius Ave / Latigo Ave Ref. # 57
Cumulative Date: 4/5/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 1 0.93% 0.93% Standard error of the mean: 0.48
26 1 0.93% 1.87% 50th Percentile: 36
27 1 0.93% 2.80% 85th Percentile: 41
28 1 0.93% 3.74% 97th Percentile: 49
29 6 5.61% 9.35% 10 Mile Pace: 32 to 41
30 7 6.54% 15.89% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 68.22%
31 5 4.67% 20.56% Comments:
32 5 4.67% 25.23%
33 9 8.41% 33.64%
34 7 6.54% 40.19%
35 7 6.54% 46.73%
36 8 7.48% 54.21%
37 4 3.74% 57.94%
38 7 6.54% 64.49%
39 5 4.67% 69.16%
40 10 9.35% 78.50%
41 11 10.28% 88.79%
42 4 3.74% 92.52%
43 2 1.87% 94.39%
44 0 0.00% 94.39%
45 2 1.87% 96.26%
46 0 0.00% 96.26%
47 0 0.00% 96.26%
48 0 0.00% 96.26%
49 2 1.87% 98.13%
50 1 0.93% 99.07%
51 1 0.93% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 107 100%
spd_form.xls
10:18-10:55A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
575
CITY OF OXNARD 58
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/5/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 9:40-10:15AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 30 To 39 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2120
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (at Wankel Way)
Road Width 48'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW, no sidewalk E/S Wankel/ Santiago Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial/ Residential
Comments
ID:
Graves Ave Latigo Ave / Wankel Way
at Pajaro St
85th percentile speed
576
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Graves Ave
Location: at Pajaro St
Between: Latigo Ave / Wankel Way Ref. # 58
Cumulative Date: 4/5/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.38
26 1 0.93% 0.93% 50th Percentile: 36
27 2 1.85% 2.78% 85th Percentile: 41
28 1 0.93% 3.70% 97th Percentile: 45
29 4 3.70% 7.41% 10 Mile Pace: 30 to 39
30 3 2.78% 10.19% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 75.00%
31 5 4.63% 14.81% Comments:
32 4 3.70% 18.52%
33 10 9.26% 27.78%
34 12 11.11% 38.89%
35 7 6.48% 45.37%
36 14 12.96% 58.33%
37 10 9.26% 67.59%
38 8 7.41% 75.00%
39 8 7.41% 82.41%
40 2 1.85% 84.26%
41 4 3.70% 87.96%
42 4 3.70% 91.67%
43 2 1.85% 93.52%
44 3 2.78% 96.30%
45 1 0.93% 97.22%
46 2 1.85% 99.07%
47 1 0.93% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 108 100%
spd_form.xls
9:40-10:15AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
577
CITY OF OXNARD 59
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/3/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:45-4:20PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 32 To 41 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73.6%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2725
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 40'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Cemetery
Comments
ID:
H Street Violet Way / Vineyard Ave
at Rosebud Dr
85th percentile speed
578
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: H Street
Location: at Rosebud Dr
Between: Violet Way / Vineyard Ave Ref. # 59
Cumulative Date: 5/3/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.39
26 1 0.94% 0.94% 50th Percentile: 36
27 0 0.00% 0.94% 85th Percentile: 41
28 3 2.83% 3.77% 97th Percentile: 44
29 3 2.83% 6.60% 10 Mile Pace: 32 to 41
30 5 4.72% 11.32% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 73.58%
31 2 1.89% 13.21% Comments:
32 10 9.43% 22.64%
33 5 4.72% 27.36%
34 8 7.55% 34.91%
35 7 6.60% 41.51%
36 12 11.32% 52.83%
37 7 6.60% 59.43%
38 5 4.72% 64.15%
39 12 11.32% 75.47%
40 8 7.55% 83.02%
41 4 3.77% 86.79%
42 5 4.72% 91.51%
43 2 1.89% 93.40%
44 4 3.77% 97.17%
45 1 0.94% 98.11%
46 0 0.00% 98.11%
47 2 1.89% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 106 100%
spd_form.xls
3:45-4:20PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
579
CITY OF OXNARD 60
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday Hours: 10:00-10:30AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 40 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 36 To 43 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80.8%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.56
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3700
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 63'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
H Street Vineyard Ave / Gonzales Rd
at Holly Ave
CVC 22358.6
580
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: H Street
Location: at Holly Ave
Between: Vineyard Ave / Gonzales Rd Ref. # 60
Cumulative Date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 40
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.37
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 40
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 43
28 1 0.83% 0.83% 97th Percentile: 48
29 0 0.00% 0.83% 10 Mile Pace: 36 to 45
30 0 0.00% 0.83% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 80.83%
31 0 0.00% 0.83% Comments:
32 2 1.67% 2.50%
33 7 5.83% 8.33%
34 2 1.67% 10.00%
35 4 3.33% 13.33%
36 8 6.67% 20.00%
37 9 7.50% 27.50%
38 10 8.33% 35.83%
39 15 12.50% 48.33%
40 10 8.33% 56.67%
41 12 10.00% 66.67%
42 15 12.50% 79.17%
43 7 5.83% 85.00%
44 5 4.17% 89.17%
45 6 5.00% 94.17%
46 2 1.67% 95.83%
47 1 0.83% 96.67%
48 1 0.83% 97.50%
49 1 0.83% 98.33%
50 1 0.83% 99.17%
51 0 0.00% 99.17%
52 1 0.83% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 120 100%
spd_form.xls
10:00-10:30AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
581
CITY OF OXNARD 61
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday Hours: 10:35-11:05AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 29 To 38 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83.7%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 4
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.65
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal/ Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4230
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Gonzales/Ivywood Rd) Road Width 63'-49'
Parking Restriction Partial
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type Uncontrolled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residential/ School/ Park
Comments Oxnard Freemont school uncontrolled crosswalk
ID:
H Street Gonzales Rd / Doris Ave
at Glenwood Dr
22358.8(a), school safety, keep existing
speed limit
582
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: H Street
Location: at Glenwood Dr
Between: Gonzales Rd / Doris Ave Ref. # 61
Cumulative Date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 33
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.36
26 3 2.44% 2.44% 50th Percentile: 33
27 4 3.25% 5.69% 85th Percentile: 37
28 2 1.63% 7.32% 97th Percentile: 41
29 8 6.50% 13.82% 10 Mile Pace: 29 to 38
30 7 5.69% 19.51% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 83.74%
31 10 8.13% 27.64% Comments:
32 17 13.82% 41.46%
33 14 11.38% 52.85%
34 15 12.20% 65.04%
35 12 9.76% 74.80%
36 10 8.13% 82.93%
37 5 4.07% 86.99%
38 5 4.07% 91.06%
39 4 3.25% 94.31%
40 1 0.81% 95.12%
41 3 2.44% 97.56%
42 3 2.44% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 123 100%
spd_form.xls
10:35-11:05AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
583
CITY OF OXNARD 62
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday Hours: 11:10-11:40AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 27 To 36 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 91.0%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.91
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2280
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Beverly/Magnolia) Road Width 49'
Parking Restriction Partial
No. Lanes and Median 1/direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
H Street Doris Ave / Second St
at Beverly Dr
22358.8(a), high collision rate, keep existing
speed limit
584
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: H Street
Location: at Beverly Dr
Between: Doris Ave / Second St Ref. # 62
Cumulative Date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 32
24 1 0.65% 0.65% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.65% Standard error of the mean: 0.24
26 4 2.58% 3.23% 50th Percentile: 33
27 7 4.52% 7.74% 85th Percentile: 35
28 7 4.52% 12.26% 97th Percentile: 37
29 9 5.81% 18.06% 10 Mile Pace: 27 to 36
30 16 10.32% 28.39% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 90.97% 31 6 3.87% 32.26% Comments:
32 23 14.84% 47.10%
33 34 21.94% 69.03%
34 15 9.68% 78.71%
35 12 7.74% 86.45%
36 12 7.74% 94.19%
37 6 3.87% 98.06%
38 0 0.00% 98.06%
39 1 0.65% 98.71%
40 0 0.00% 98.71%
41 0 0.00% 98.71%
42 0 0.00% 98.71%
43 1 0.65% 99.35%
44 1 0.65% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 155 100%
spd_form.xls
11:10-11:40AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
585
CITY OF OXNARD 63
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday Hours: 11:45AM-12:15PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 32 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 28 To 37 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88.8%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.47
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign/ Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1470
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 49'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential E/S
Comments
ID:
H Street Second St / Fifth St
200 ft s/o Third Street
22358.8(a), keep existing speed limit,
continuation of speed
586
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: H Street
Location: 200 ft s/o Third Street
Between: Second St / Fifth St Ref. # 63
Cumulative Date: 3/14/2022 Day: Monday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 33
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.24
26 1 0.66% 0.66% 50th Percentile: 32
27 3 1.97% 2.63% 85th Percentile: 36
28 6 3.95% 6.58% 97th Percentile: 39
29 19 12.50% 19.08% 10 Mile Pace: 28 to 37
30 16 10.53% 29.61% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 88.82% 31 13 8.55% 38.16% Comments:
32 19 12.50% 50.66%
33 19 12.50% 63.16%
34 10 6.58% 69.74%
35 14 9.21% 78.95%
36 12 7.89% 86.84%
37 7 4.61% 91.45%
38 6 3.95% 95.39%
39 3 1.97% 97.37%
40 3 1.97% 99.34%
41 0 0.00% 99.34%
42 0 0.00% 99.34%
43 1 0.66% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 152 100%
spd_form.xls
11:45AM-12:15PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
587
CITY OF OXNARD 64
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:30-4:00PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 32 To 41 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.36
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type None
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2700
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Los Feliz/ La Brea) Road Width 58'
Parking Restriction Yes, No parking E/S
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW except no SW W/S of Las Palmas /Bluefin Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Commercial
Comments
ID:
Harbor Blvd Bluefin Cir / La Brea St
at Cabezone Cir
85th percentile speed
588
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Harbor Blvd
Location: at Cabezone Cir
Between: Bluefin Cir / La Brea St Ref. # 64
Cumulative Date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 37
24 1 0.91% 0.91% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.91% Standard error of the mean: 0.38
26 1 0.91% 1.82% 50th Percentile: 37
27 1 0.91% 2.73% 85th Percentile: 41
28 0 0.00% 2.73% 97th Percentile: 43
29 5 4.55% 7.27% 10 Mile Pace: 32 to 41
30 4 3.64% 10.91% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 77.27%
31 3 2.73% 13.64% Comments:
32 5 4.55% 18.18%
33 7 6.36% 24.55%
34 4 3.64% 28.18%
35 7 6.36% 34.55%
36 12 10.91% 45.45%
37 7 6.36% 51.82%
38 14 12.73% 64.55%
39 10 9.09% 73.64%
40 8 7.27% 80.91%
41 11 10.00% 90.91%
42 4 3.64% 94.55%
43 3 2.73% 97.27%
44 1 0.91% 98.18%
45 1 0.91% 99.09%
46 1 0.91% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 110 100%
spd_form.xls
3:30-4:00PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
589
CITY OF OXNARD 65
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:00-3:30PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.1%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1965
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical to Horizontal (La Brea/ Channel Islands) Road Width 58'-50'
Parking Restriction Yes, No parking E/S
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Commercial
Comments
ID:
Harbor Blvd Channel Islands Blvd / La Brea St
300 ft N of La Brea St
85th percentile speed
590
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Harbor Blvd
Location: 300 ft N of La Brea St
Between: Channel Islands Blvd / La Brea St Ref. # 65
Cumulative Date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 38
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.38
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 38
27 1 0.91% 0.91% 85th Percentile: 42
28 0 0.00% 0.91% 97th Percentile: 45
29 4 3.64% 4.55% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 0 0.00% 4.55% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 79.09%
31 2 1.82% 6.36% Comments:
32 5 4.55% 10.91%
33 4 3.64% 14.55%
34 7 6.36% 20.91%
35 8 7.27% 28.18%
36 11 10.00% 38.18%
37 10 9.09% 47.27%
38 13 11.82% 59.09%
39 10 9.09% 68.18%
40 9 8.18% 76.36%
41 6 5.45% 81.82%
42 9 8.18% 90.00%
43 4 3.64% 93.64%
44 2 1.82% 95.45%
45 2 1.82% 97.27%
46 2 1.82% 99.09%
47 1 0.91% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 110 100%
spd_form.xls
3:00-3:30PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
591
CITY OF OXNARD 66
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:20-2:50PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 53 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 45 To 54 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.5%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.18
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.91
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 18431
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2900
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Channel Islands/ Meridian) Road Width 96'
Parking Restriction No parking W/S
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW on W/S. C&G on E/S
Bicycle lanes/Type Class Ii
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Park
Comments Park on Eastbourne has no crosswalk
ID:
Harbor Blvd Eastbourne Bay / Channel Islands Blvd
at Costa De Oro
CVC 22358.6
592
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Harbor Blvd
Location: at Costa De Oro
Between: Eastbourne Bay / Channel Islands Blvd Ref. # 66 Cumulative Date: 4/12/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 50 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 49
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 49
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 53
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 56
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 45 to 54
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 79.55%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 1 0.76% 0.76%
36 1 0.76% 1.52%
37 1 0.76% 2.27%
38 0 0.00% 2.27%
39 1 0.76% 3.03%
40 3 2.27% 5.30%
41 1 0.76% 6.06%
42 5 3.79% 9.85%
43 3 2.27% 12.12%
44 4 3.03% 15.15%
45 3 2.27% 17.42%
46 11 8.33% 25.76%
47 14 10.61% 36.36%
48 13 9.85% 46.21%
49 18 13.64% 59.85%
50 9 6.82% 66.67%
51 11 8.33% 75.00%
52 11 8.33% 83.33%
53 10 7.58% 90.91%
54 5 3.79% 94.70%
55 2 1.52% 96.21%
56 2 1.52% 97.73%
57 3 2.27% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 132 100%
spd_form.xls
2:20-2:50PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
593
CITY OF OXNARD 67
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/12&4/26/22 Day: Tuesday Hours: 9:00-9:40A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 50 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 54 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 46 To 55 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.7%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 6
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.53
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.91
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 18431
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2935
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 96'-80'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G W/S only. E/S none
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ River Bank
Comments
ID:
Harbor Blvd Eastbourne Bay /Wooley Rd
at Natilus
CVC 22358.6
594
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Harbor Blvd
Location: at Natilus
Between: Eastbourne Bay /Wooley Rd Ref. # 67
Cumulative Date: 4/12&4/26/22 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY/AY
19 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 50 mph
20 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00%
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 50
26 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
27 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 50
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 54
30 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 58
31 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 46 to 55
32 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.74%
33 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 0 0.00% 0.00%
36 1 0.79% 0.79%
37 1 0.79% 1.57%
38 0 0.00% 1.57%
39 2 1.57% 3.15%
40 0 0.00% 3.15%
41 1 0.79% 3.94%
42 3 2.36% 6.30%
43 4 3.15% 9.45%
44 4 3.15% 12.60%
45 4 3.15% 15.75%
46 9 7.09% 22.83%
47 8 6.30% 29.13%
48 6 4.72% 33.86%
49 16 12.60% 46.46%
50 12 9.45% 55.91%
51 12 9.45% 65.35%
52 14 11.02% 76.38%
53 7 5.51% 81.89%
54 10 7.87% 89.76%
55 6 4.72% 94.49%
56 2 1.57% 96.06%
57 0 0.00% 96.06%
58 2 1.57% 97.64%
59 2 1.57% 99.21%
60 1 0.79% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 127 100%
spd_form.xls
9:00-9:40A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
595
CITY OF OXNARD 68
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/12&4/26/22 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:30-2:45PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 53 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 45 To 54 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.6%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.09
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.91
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 18431
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2900
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 80'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G W/S only. E/S none
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ River Bank
Comments
ID:
Harbor Blvd Fifth Street / Wooley Rd
s/o Drift Way
CVC 22358.6
596
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Harbor Blvd
Location: s/o Drift Way
Between: Fifth Street / Wooley Rd Ref. # 68
Cumulative Date: 4/12&4/26/22 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY/AY
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 50 mph
19 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00%
23 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 49
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
26 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 49
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 53
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 57
30 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 45 to 54
31 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.63%
32 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 0 0.00% 0.00%
36 0 0.00% 0.00%
37 0 0.00% 0.00%
38 0 0.00% 0.00%
39 2 1.53% 1.53%
40 0 0.00% 1.53%
41 4 3.05% 4.58%
42 5 3.82% 8.40%
43 5 3.82% 12.21%
44 3 2.29% 14.50%
45 8 6.11% 20.61%
46 8 6.11% 26.72%
47 15 11.45% 38.17%
48 8 6.11% 44.27%
49 14 10.69% 54.96%
50 10 7.63% 62.60%
51 15 11.45% 74.05%
52 12 9.16% 83.21%
53 7 5.34% 88.55%
54 6 4.58% 93.13%
55 0 0.00% 93.13%
56 4 3.05% 96.18%
57 2 1.53% 97.71%
58 0 0.00% 97.71%
59 2 1.53% 99.24%
60 1 0.76% 100.00%
Total: 131 100%
spd_form.xls
2:30-2:45PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
597
CITY OF OXNARD 71
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 11:35AM-12:05PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 6
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.05
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3940
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 64'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type Uncontrolled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments Uncontrolled school crosswalk
ID:
Hemlock St Victoria Ave / Patterson Rd
at Masthead Dr
CVC 22358.6, high collision rate, school
safety, bicycle safety, reduce speed limit
598
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Hemlock St
Location: at Masthead Dr
Between: Victoria Ave / Patterson Rd Ref. # 71
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 39
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 39
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 42
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 46
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 82.49%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 5 2.82% 2.82%
33 14 7.91% 10.73%
34 11 6.21% 16.95%
35 9 5.08% 22.03%
36 16 9.04% 31.07%
37 16 9.04% 40.11%
38 9 5.08% 45.20%
39 22 12.43% 57.63%
40 17 9.60% 67.23%
41 11 6.21% 73.45%
42 21 11.86% 85.31%
43 10 5.65% 90.96%
44 5 2.82% 93.79%
45 5 2.82% 96.61%
46 2 1.13% 97.74%
47 3 1.69% 99.44%
48 0 0.00% 99.44%
49 1 0.56% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 177 100%
spd_form.xls
11:35AM-12:05PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
599
CITY OF OXNARD 72
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 11:00-11:30AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 34 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 31 To 40 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.9%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.34
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4015
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 49'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes, except no SW between Bolker Dr/ Dunsmuir Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type Uncontrolled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments Uncontrolled school crosswalk
ID:
Hemlock St Patterson Rd / Ventura Rd
at McLoughlin Ave
CVC 22358.6, school safety
600
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Hemlock St
Location: at McLoughlin Ave
Between: Patterson Rd / Ventura Rd Ref. # 72
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 35
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.38
26 1 0.92% 0.92% 50th Percentile: 34
27 2 1.83% 2.75% 85th Percentile: 39
28 2 1.83% 4.59% 97th Percentile: 45
29 5 4.59% 9.17% 10 Mile Pace: 31 to 40
30 2 1.83% 11.01% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.90%
31 6 5.50% 16.51% Comments:
32 9 8.26% 24.77%
33 15 13.76% 38.53%
34 13 11.93% 50.46%
35 11 10.09% 60.55%
36 13 11.93% 72.48%
37 3 2.75% 75.23%
38 5 4.59% 79.82%
39 7 6.42% 86.24%
40 4 3.67% 89.91%
41 2 1.83% 91.74%
42 1 0.92% 92.66%
43 0 0.00% 92.66%
44 3 2.75% 95.41%
45 4 3.67% 99.08%
46 0 0.00% 99.08%
47 0 0.00% 99.08%
48 0 0.00% 99.08%
49 1 0.92% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 109 100%
spd_form.xls
11:00-11:30AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
601
CITY OF OXNARD 73
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/14/2022 Day: Thursday Hours: 10:00-10:30AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 30 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 26 To 35 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88.4%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.34
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2015
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Fifth /Ninth)
Road Width 49'-65'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction /TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Park
Comments
ID:
Hobson Way Ninth St / Fifth St
at Seventh St
CVC 22358.6
602
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Hobson Way
Location: at Seventh St
Between: Ninth St / Fifth St Ref. # 73
Cumulative Date: 4/14/2022 Day: Thursday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 1 0.83% 0.83% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 2 1.65% 2.48% Mean Speed: 30
24 3 2.48% 4.96% Standard Deviation: 3
25 1 0.83% 5.79% Standard error of the mean: 0.27
26 15 12.40% 18.18% 50th Percentile: 30
27 5 4.13% 22.31% 85th Percentile: 33
28 11 9.09% 31.40% 97th Percentile: 37
29 14 11.57% 42.98% 10 Mile Pace: 26 to 35
30 16 13.22% 56.20% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 88.43% 31 12 9.92% 66.12% Comments:
32 12 9.92% 76.03%
33 11 9.09% 85.12%
34 6 4.96% 90.08%
35 5 4.13% 94.21%
36 3 2.48% 96.69%
37 3 2.48% 99.17%
38 0 0.00% 99.17%
39 1 0.83% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00%
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 121 100%
spd_form.xls
10:00-10:30AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
603
CITY OF OXNARD 74
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 12:30-12:50PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 37 To 46 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.41
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 14073
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2503
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 83'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW except no SW S/S between Perking Rd/ Saviers Rd Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial/ Farm Land
Comments High truck traffic
ID:
Hueneme Rd J Street / Saviers St
500' e/o Perkins Rd
CVC 22358.6
604
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Hueneme Rd
Location: 500' e/o Perkins Rd
Between: J Street / Saviers St Ref. # 74
Cumulative Date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 43
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.39
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 42
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 48
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 52
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 37 to 46
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 67.47%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 1 0.60% 0.60%
33 0 0.00% 0.60%
34 3 1.81% 2.41%
35 5 3.01% 5.42%
36 9 5.42% 10.84%
37 8 4.82% 15.66%
38 6 3.61% 19.28%
39 13 7.83% 27.11%
40 10 6.02% 33.13%
41 11 6.63% 39.76%
42 21 12.65% 52.41%
43 10 6.02% 58.43%
44 9 5.42% 63.86%
45 11 6.63% 70.48%
46 13 7.83% 78.31%
47 6 3.61% 81.93%
48 7 4.22% 86.14%
49 9 5.42% 91.57%
50 5 3.01% 94.58%
51 4 2.41% 96.99%
52 3 1.81% 98.80%
53 1 0.60% 99.40%
54 0 0.00% 99.40%
55 0 0.00% 99.40%
56 1 0.60% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 166 100%
spd_form.xls
12:30-12:50PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
605
CITY OF OXNARD 75
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 3:10-3:25PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 47 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 37 To 46 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72.6%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.11
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 13351
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3400
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 70'-90'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/ direction/ Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Industrial
Comments RR crossing (Salvador Dr/ Arcturns Ave and Arcturns Ave/ Edison Dr) high truck traffic
ID:
Hueneme Rd Saviers Rd / Edison Dr
300' w/o Arcturus Ave
85th percentile speed
606
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Hueneme Rd
Location: 300' w/o Arcturus Ave
Between: Saviers Rd / Edison Dr Ref. # 75
Cumulative Date: 4/22/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY / AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 42
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.43
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 42
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 47
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 50
29 1 0.74% 0.74% 10 Mile Pace: 37 to 46
30 0 0.00% 0.74% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 72.59%
31 0 0.00% 0.74% Comments:
32 1 0.74% 1.48%
33 3 2.22% 3.70%
34 2 1.48% 5.19%
35 4 2.96% 8.15%
36 5 3.70% 11.85%
37 8 5.93% 17.78%
38 9 6.67% 24.44%
39 9 6.67% 31.11%
40 6 4.44% 35.56%
41 11 8.15% 43.70%
42 15 11.11% 54.81%
43 7 5.19% 60.00%
44 10 7.41% 67.41%
45 10 7.41% 74.81%
46 13 9.63% 84.44%
47 2 1.48% 85.93%
48 4 2.96% 88.89%
49 7 5.19% 94.07%
50 5 3.70% 97.78%
51 1 0.74% 98.52%
52 2 1.48% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 135 100%
spd_form.xls
3:10-3:25PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
607
CITY OF OXNARD 76
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 1:30-2:10PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 32 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 27 To 36 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 90.1%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 4
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.04
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2640
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 110'-120'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction/ stormwater channel median (70' width) Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
J Street Hueneme Rd / Pleasant Valley Rd
s/o Shoreline Cove Center
22358.8(a), high collision rate, keep existing
speed limit
608
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: J Street
Location: s/o Shoreline Cove Center
Between: Hueneme Rd / Pleasant Valley Rd Ref. # 76
Cumulative Date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 32
24 1 0.99% 0.99% Standard Deviation: 4
25 2 1.98% 2.97% Standard error of the mean: 0.4
26 0 0.00% 2.97% 50th Percentile: 32
27 8 7.92% 10.89% 85th Percentile: 35
28 8 7.92% 18.81% 97th Percentile: 38
29 12 11.88% 30.69% 10 Mile Pace: 27 to 36
30 10 9.90% 40.59% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 90.10% 31 5 4.95% 45.54% Comments:
32 15 14.85% 60.40%
33 15 14.85% 75.25%
34 6 5.94% 81.19%
35 5 4.95% 86.14%
36 7 6.93% 93.07%
37 2 1.98% 95.05%
38 2 1.98% 97.03%
39 1 0.99% 98.02%
40 0 0.00% 98.02%
41 0 0.00% 98.02%
42 1 0.99% 99.01%
43 0 0.00% 99.01%
44 0 0.00% 99.01%
45 0 0.00% 99.01%
46 1 0.99% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 101 100%
spd_form.xls
1:30-2:10PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
609
CITY OF OXNARD 77
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 11:50AM-12:30PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 34 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 29 To 38 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.0%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.30
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal/ Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2300
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 110'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction, Stormwater channel median (55' width) Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class Ii
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential/ Park
Comments
ID:
J Street Pleasant Valley Rd / Bard Rd
at Sycamore Dr
22358.8(a), keep existing speed limit
610
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: J Street
Location: at Sycamore Dr
Between: Pleasant Valley Rd / Bard Rd Ref. # 77
Cumulative Date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 35
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.58
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 34
27 2 2.67% 2.67% 85th Percentile: 38
28 0 0.00% 2.67% 97th Percentile: 50
29 4 5.33% 8.00% 10 Mile Pace: 29 to 38
30 6 8.00% 16.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 84.00%
31 3 4.00% 20.00% Comments:
32 4 5.33% 25.33%
33 9 12.00% 37.33%
34 12 16.00% 53.33%
35 5 6.67% 60.00%
36 10 13.33% 73.33%
37 5 6.67% 80.00%
38 5 6.67% 86.67%
39 3 4.00% 90.67%
40 1 1.33% 92.00%
41 0 0.00% 92.00%
42 1 1.33% 93.33%
43 0 0.00% 93.33%
44 1 1.33% 94.67%
45 1 1.33% 96.00%
46 0 0.00% 96.00%
47 0 0.00% 96.00%
48 0 0.00% 96.00%
49 0 0.00% 96.00%
50 2 2.67% 98.67%
51 0 0.00% 98.67%
52 1 1.33% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 75 100%
spd_form.xls
11:50AM-12:30PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
611
CITY OF OXNARD 78
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 10:50-11:40AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 29 To 38 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73.3%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.59
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3475
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 105'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction, stormwater channel median (52' width) Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
J Street Bard Rd / Teakwood St
at Polaris Way
22358.8(a), keep existing speed limit
612
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: J Street
Location: at Polaris Way
Between: Bard Rd / Teakwood St Ref. # 78
Cumulative Date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 34
24 1 0.99% 0.99% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.99% Standard error of the mean: 0.5
26 2 1.98% 2.97% 50th Percentile: 33
27 3 2.97% 5.94% 85th Percentile: 39
28 4 3.96% 9.90% 97th Percentile: 44
29 10 9.90% 19.80% 10 Mile Pace: 29 to 38
30 7 6.93% 26.73% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 73.27%
31 12 11.88% 38.61% Comments:
32 7 6.93% 45.54%
33 12 11.88% 57.43%
34 6 5.94% 63.37%
35 4 3.96% 67.33%
36 6 5.94% 73.27%
37 5 4.95% 78.22%
38 5 4.95% 83.17%
39 6 5.94% 89.11%
40 1 0.99% 90.10%
41 3 2.97% 93.07%
42 3 2.97% 96.04%
43 0 0.00% 96.04%
44 2 1.98% 98.02%
45 0 0.00% 98.02%
46 2 1.98% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 101 100%
spd_form.xls
10:50-11:40AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
613
CITY OF OXNARD 79
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 10:05-10:45AM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 32 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 28 To 37 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.5%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.38
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign /Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1825
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Redwood/ Channel islands) Road Width 49'-105'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction , Stormwater channel median (52' width) Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
J Street Teakwood St / Channel Islands Blvd
near Spruce St
CVC 22358.8(a), keep existing speed limit
614
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: J Street
Location: near Spruce St
Between: Teakwood St / Channel Islands Blvd Ref. # 79
Cumulative Date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 32
24 1 0.97% 0.97% Standard Deviation: 3
25 4 3.88% 4.85% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 2 1.94% 6.80% 50th Percentile: 32
27 2 1.94% 8.74% 85th Percentile: 36
28 7 6.80% 15.53% 97th Percentile: 39
29 12 11.65% 27.18% 10 Mile Pace: 28 to 37
30 7 6.80% 33.98% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 84.47%
31 12 11.65% 45.63% Comments:
32 14 13.59% 59.22%
33 17 16.50% 75.73%
34 6 5.83% 81.55%
35 3 2.91% 84.47%
36 4 3.88% 88.35%
37 5 4.85% 93.20%
38 3 2.91% 96.12%
39 2 1.94% 98.06%
40 1 0.97% 99.03% S
41 1 0.97% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 103 100%
spd_form.xls
10:05-10:45AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
615
CITY OF OXNARD 80
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 9:33-10:03AM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 31 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 27 To 36 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82.0%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 7
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.13
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal/ Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4250
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Channel Islands) ( Juniper /Cedar) Road Width 49'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1/ direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class Ii
Crosswalks/Type Controlled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residential /School
Comments Kamila Elem STOP controlled crosswalk
ID:
J Street Channel Islands Blvd / Hill St
at Fir Ave
CVC 22358.8(a), high collision rate, school
safet, keep existing speed limit
616
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: J Street
Location: at Fir Ave
Between: Channel Islands Blvd / Hill St Ref. # 80
Cumulative Date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 31
24 1 0.82% 0.82% Standard Deviation: 4
25 2 1.64% 2.46% Standard error of the mean: 0.36
26 7 5.74% 8.20% 50th Percentile: 31
27 6 4.92% 13.11% 85th Percentile: 36
28 15 12.30% 25.41% 97th Percentile: 40
29 10 8.20% 33.61% 10 Mile Pace: 27 to 36
30 15 12.30% 45.90% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 81.97% 31 12 9.84% 55.74% Comments:
32 11 9.02% 64.75%
33 12 9.84% 74.59%
34 8 6.56% 81.15%
35 3 2.46% 83.61%
36 8 6.56% 90.16%
37 1 0.82% 90.98%
38 2 1.64% 92.62%
39 4 3.28% 95.90%
40 2 1.64% 97.54% S
41 1 0.82% 98.36%
42 1 0.82% 99.18%
43 0 0.00% 99.18%
44 0 0.00% 99.18%
45 0 0.00% 99.18%
46 1 0.82% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 122 100%
spd_form.xls
9:33-10:03AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
617
CITY OF OXNARD 81
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 8:55-9:30AM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 31 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 26 To 35 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 5
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.55
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign /Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2225
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Hill) (Wooley/9th) Road Width 58'-49'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments RR crossing at Wooley Rd
ID:
J Street Hill St / Ninth St
300 ft N of Wooley
CVC 22358.8(a), high collision rate, keep
existing speed limit
618
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: J Street
Location: 300 ft N of Wooley
Between: Hill St / Ninth St Ref. # 81
Cumulative Date: 3/11/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 31
24 1 0.80% 0.80% Standard Deviation: 3
25 2 1.60% 2.40% Standard error of the mean: 0.27
26 7 5.60% 8.00% 50th Percentile: 31
27 7 5.60% 13.60% 85th Percentile: 35
28 14 11.20% 24.80% 97th Percentile: 37
29 19 15.20% 40.00% 10 Mile Pace: 26 to 35
30 11 8.80% 48.80% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 88.00% 31 7 5.60% 54.40% Comments:
32 16 12.80% 67.20%
33 10 8.00% 75.20%
34 9 7.20% 82.40%
35 10 8.00% 90.40%
36 4 3.20% 93.60%
37 5 4.00% 97.60%
38 1 0.80% 98.40%
39 1 0.80% 99.20%
40 0 0.00% 99.20% S
41 0 0.00% 99.20%
42 1 0.80% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 125 100%
spd_form.xls
8:55-9:30AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
619
CITY OF OXNARD 82
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 3:10-3:50PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 34 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 30 To 39 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.27
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3625
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (Williams /Eastern Terminal) Road Width 63'-44'
Parking Restriction Yes between Rose/ Williams
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G all. Sidewalk except between Hosler /Williams Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial /Industrial
Comments
ID:
Lockwood St Rose Ave / Eastern Terminal
at Williams Dr
CVC 22358.6
620
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Lockwood St
Location: at Williams Dr
Between: Rose Ave / Eastern Terminal Ref. # 82
Cumulative Date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY/EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 3 2.24% 2.24% Mean Speed: 34
24 0 0.00% 2.24% Standard Deviation: 4
25 1 0.75% 2.99% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 4 2.99% 5.97% 50th Percentile: 34
27 2 1.49% 7.46% 85th Percentile: 39
28 3 2.24% 9.70% 97th Percentile: 41
29 7 5.22% 14.93% 10 Mile Pace: 30 to 39
30 5 3.73% 18.66% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 75.37%
31 13 9.70% 28.36% Comments:
32 10 7.46% 35.82%
33 15 11.19% 47.01%
34 11 8.21% 55.22%
35 10 7.46% 62.69%
36 12 8.96% 71.64%
37 10 7.46% 79.10%
38 7 5.22% 84.33%
39 8 5.97% 90.30%
40 5 3.73% 94.03% S
41 4 2.99% 97.01%
42 2 1.49% 98.51%
43 1 0.75% 99.25%
44 0 0.00% 99.25%
45 1 0.75% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 134 100%
spd_form.xls
3:10-3:50PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
621
CITY OF OXNARD 83
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 10:50-11:35AM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 27 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 32 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 23 To 32 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.68
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2850
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 65'-32'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial /Residential
Comments
ID:
Lombard St Gonzales Rd / 150' n/o Posada Dr
300' s/o Wankel Way
85th percentile speed, Reduce speed limit
622
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Lombard St
Location: 300' s/o Wankel Way
Between: Gonzales Rd / 150' n/o Posada Dr Ref. # 83
Cumulative Date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 1 1.00% 1.00%
22 4 4.00% 5.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 8 8.00% 13.00% Mean Speed: 28
24 9 9.00% 22.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 9 9.00% 31.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.4
26 15 15.00% 46.00% 50th Percentile: 27
27 6 6.00% 52.00% 85th Percentile: 32
28 12 12.00% 64.00% 97th Percentile: 35
29 8 8.00% 72.00% 10 Mile Pace: 23 to 32
30 8 8.00% 80.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 84.00%
31 4 4.00% 84.00% Comments:
32 5 5.00% 89.00%
33 5 5.00% 94.00%
34 2 2.00% 96.00%
35 1 1.00% 97.00%
36 3 3.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00% S
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 100 100%
spd_form.xls
10:50-11:35AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
623
CITY OF OXNARD 84
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/5/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 10:58 -11:30A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75.6%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.37
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2630
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Celsius /Sturgis) Road Width 63'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction, TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Lombard Street Eastman Ave / Camino Del Sol
at Sturgis Rd
85th percentile speed
624
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Lombard Street
Location: at Sturgis Rd
Between: Eastman Ave / Camino Del Sol Ref. # 84
Cumulative Date: 4/5/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 37
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.43
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 37
27 1 0.74% 0.74% 85th Percentile: 41
28 1 0.74% 1.48% 97th Percentile: 46
29 6 4.44% 5.93% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 7 5.19% 11.11% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 75.56%
31 5 3.70% 14.81% Comments:
32 5 3.70% 18.52%
33 9 6.67% 25.19%
34 10 7.41% 32.59%
35 7 5.19% 37.78%
36 14 10.37% 48.15%
37 8 5.93% 54.07%
38 12 8.89% 62.96%
39 12 8.89% 71.85%
40 14 10.37% 82.22% S
41 6 4.44% 86.67%
42 10 7.41% 94.07%
43 2 1.48% 95.56%
44 0 0.00% 95.56%
45 0 0.00% 95.56%
46 3 2.22% 97.78%
47 1 0.74% 98.52%
48 0 0.00% 98.52%
49 1 0.74% 99.26%
50 0 0.00% 99.26%
51 1 0.74% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 135 100%
spd_form.xls
10:58 -11:30A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
625
CITY OF OXNARD 85
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/17/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 9:15 -10:40A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 23 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 26 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 18 To 27 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89.1%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.59
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2745
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Shoreline /Outrigger) Road Width 40'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
Mandalay Beach Road Beach Way / Wooley Rd
at Marlin Way
85th percentile speed
626
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Mandalay Beach Road
Location: at Marlin Way
Between: Beach Way / Wooley Rd Ref. # 85
Cumulative Date: 5/17/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 2 3.13% 3.13% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 3.13% Recorder: EY
17 2 3.13% 6.25% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 4 6.25% 12.50% Remarks:
19 5 7.81% 20.31%
20 4 6.25% 26.56%
21 6 9.38% 35.94%
22 7 10.94% 46.88% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 9 14.06% 60.94% Mean Speed: 22
24 7 10.94% 71.88% Standard Deviation: 3
25 6 9.38% 81.25% Standard error of the mean: 0.38
26 6 9.38% 90.63% 50th Percentile: 23
27 3 4.69% 95.31% 85th Percentile: 26
28 2 3.13% 98.44% 97th Percentile: 28
29 1 1.56% 100.00% 10 Mile Pace: 18 to 27
30 0 0.00% 100.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 89.06% 31 0 0.00% 100.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 100.00%
33 0 0.00% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00% S
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 64 100%
spd_form.xls
9:15 -10:40A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
627
CITY OF OXNARD 86
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/17/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 8:10 - 9:10A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 23 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 26 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 19 To 28 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85.5%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3310
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 40'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
Mandalay Beach Road Wooley Rd / Fifth St
at Driftwood St
85th percentile speed
628
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Mandalay Beach Road
Location: at Driftwood St
Between: Wooley Rd / Fifth St Ref. # 86
Cumulative Date: 5/17/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 1 1.20% 1.20% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 1.20% Recorder: EY
17 3 3.61% 4.82% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 0 0.00% 4.82% Remarks:
19 7 8.43% 13.25%
20 3 3.61% 16.87%
21 9 10.84% 27.71%
22 14 16.87% 44.58% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 8 9.64% 54.22% Mean Speed: 24
24 10 12.05% 66.27% Standard Deviation: 4
25 5 6.02% 72.29% Standard error of the mean: 0.44
26 11 13.25% 85.54% 50th Percentile: 23
27 2 2.41% 87.95% 85th Percentile: 26
28 2 2.41% 90.36% 97th Percentile: 33
29 1 1.20% 91.57% 10 Mile Pace: 19 to 28
30 2 2.41% 93.98% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 85.54%
31 1 1.20% 95.18% Comments:
32 1 1.20% 96.39%
33 1 1.20% 97.59%
34 1 1.20% 98.80%
35 0 0.00% 98.80%
36 0 0.00% 98.80%
37 0 0.00% 98.80%
38 1 1.20% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00% S
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 83 100%
spd_form.xls
8:10 - 9:10A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
629
CITY OF OXNARD 87
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 2:30 -3:20P
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 26 Existing Speed Zone None 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 29 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 20 To 29 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 91.7%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3000
Traffic Control Type None
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1310
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (Dodge /Fortuna) Road Width 30'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G between Fortuna /Dodge. SW N/S between Fortuna /Dodge Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential N/S
Comments
ID:
CVC 22358.6
Maulhardt Rd Dodge Rd / Pleasant Valley Rd
at Oxnard Pacific Entrance
630
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Maulhardt Rd
Location: at Oxnard Pacific Entrance
Between: Dodge Rd / Pleasant Valley Rd Ref. # 87
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY/AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: None
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 3 3.57% 3.57%
21 3 3.57% 7.14%
22 9 10.71% 17.86% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 7 8.33% 26.19% Mean Speed: 26
24 7 8.33% 34.52% Standard Deviation: 3
25 5 5.95% 40.48% Standard error of the mean: 0.33
26 13 15.48% 55.95% 50th Percentile: 26
27 15 17.86% 73.81% 85th Percentile: 29
28 5 5.95% 79.76% 97th Percentile: 32
29 10 11.90% 91.67% 10 Mile Pace: 20 to 29
30 1 1.19% 92.86% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 91.67%
31 1 1.19% 94.05% Comments:
32 3 3.57% 97.62%
33 2 2.38% 100.00%
34 0 0.00% 100.00%
35 0 0.00% 100.00%
36 0 0.00% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00% S
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 84 100%
spd_form.xls
2:30 -3:20P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
631
CITY OF OXNARD 88
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/14/2022 Day: Thursday Hours: 10:35
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.8%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1710
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal (Ventura /L St) (Intel /Hobson) Road Width 63'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction ,TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
Ninth St Ventura Rd / Hobson Way
at K St
85th percentile speed
632
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Ninth St
Location: at K St
Between: Ventura Rd / Hobson Way Ref. # 88
Cumulative Date: 4/14/2022 Day: Thursday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 37
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.45
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 36
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 41
28 1 1.27% 1.27% 97th Percentile: 43
29 0 0.00% 1.27% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 1 1.27% 2.53% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 84.81%
31 4 5.06% 7.59% Comments:
32 2 2.53% 10.13%
33 7 8.86% 18.99%
34 8 10.13% 29.11%
35 6 7.59% 36.71%
36 12 15.19% 51.90%
37 7 8.86% 60.76%
38 6 7.59% 68.35%
39 5 6.33% 74.68%
40 6 7.59% 82.28% S
41 4 5.06% 87.34%
42 6 7.59% 94.94%
43 2 2.53% 97.47%
44 2 2.53% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 79 100%
spd_form.xls
10:35
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
633
CITY OF OXNARD 89
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 12:55-2:00PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 31 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 26 To 35 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71.3%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.39
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2485
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 42'-61'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1 /direction, Painted only between Ocean View Children Center and Etting Improvement (SW, C & G) W/S yes. E/S C&G&SW between Ocen View Children Center and Etting Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type Uncontrolled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residential /Junior High
Comments Ocean View Junior High STOP controlled crosswalk at Etting RRFB controlled at school
ID:
Olds Rd Sanford St / Etting Rd
at Walden St
CVC 22358.8(a), school safety, keep existing
speed limit
634
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Olds Rd
Location: at Walden St
Between: Sanford St / Etting Rd Ref. # 89
Cumulative Date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 1 1.15% 1.15%
22 1 1.15% 2.30% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 1 1.15% 3.45% Mean Speed: 32
24 1 1.15% 4.60% Standard Deviation: 5
25 1 1.15% 5.75% Standard error of the mean: 0.54
26 3 3.45% 9.20% 50th Percentile: 31
27 11 12.64% 21.84% 85th Percentile: 37
28 4 4.60% 26.44% 97th Percentile: 44
29 8 9.20% 35.63% 10 Mile Pace: 26 to 35
30 5 5.75% 41.38% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 71.26%
31 9 10.34% 51.72% Comments:
32 4 4.60% 56.32%
33 7 8.05% 64.37%
34 8 9.20% 73.56%
35 3 3.45% 77.01%
36 3 3.45% 80.46%
37 5 5.75% 86.21%
38 3 3.45% 89.66%
39 2 2.30% 91.95%
40 2 2.30% 94.25% S
41 1 1.15% 95.40%
42 1 1.15% 96.55%
43 0 0.00% 96.55%
44 2 2.30% 98.85%
45 0 0.00% 98.85%
46 1 1.15% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 87 100%
spd_form.xls
12:55-2:00PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
635
CITY OF OXNARD 90
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 9:20 -9:55A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 32 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 27 To 36 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89.0%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.28
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 35826
Traffic Control Type Roundabout /Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1440
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Clyde /Town Center) Road Width 85'-76'
Parking Restriction Partial
No. Lanes and Median 2 /direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Commercial
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Forest Park Blvd / Town Center Dr
at Danvers River St
85th percentile speed
636
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: at Danvers River St
Between: Forest Park Blvd / Town Center Dr Ref. # 90
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: None
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 32
24 1 0.92% 0.92% Standard Deviation: 3
25 2 1.83% 2.75% Standard error of the mean: 0.29
26 1 0.92% 3.67% 50th Percentile: 32
27 5 4.59% 8.26% 85th Percentile: 35
28 5 4.59% 12.84% 97th Percentile: 39
29 15 13.76% 26.61% 10 Mile Pace: 27 to 36
30 13 11.93% 38.53% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 88.99% 31 12 11.01% 49.54% Comments:
32 10 9.17% 58.72%
33 13 11.93% 70.64%
34 12 11.01% 81.65%
35 5 4.59% 86.24%
36 7 6.42% 92.66%
37 2 1.83% 94.50%
38 2 1.83% 96.33%
39 3 2.75% 99.08%
40 0 0.00% 99.08% S
41 0 0.00% 99.08%
42 1 0.92% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 109 100%
spd_form.xls
9:20 -9:55A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
637
CITY OF OXNARD 91
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 10:00-10:20AM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 45 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 41 To 50 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 7
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.53
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 28956
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2200
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical
Road Width 120'-125'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2 /direction n/o 101 freeway. 3/ direction s/o 101 freeway, Raised Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II partial
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial /Freeway
Comments Segment is 101 Freeway overpass and Caltrans R/W ID:
Oxnard Blvd Town Center Dr / Wagon Wheel Rd
btw Wagon Wheel and 101 Ramps
CVC 22358.6, Reduce speed limit
638
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: btw Wagon Wheel and 101 Ramps
Between: Town Center Dr / Wagon Wheel Rd Ref. # 91
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 50 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 44
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.44
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 45
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 49
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 53
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 41 to 50
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 71.54%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 4 3.08% 3.08%
36 4 3.08% 6.15%
37 2 1.54% 7.69%
38 6 4.62% 12.31%
39 5 3.85% 16.15%
40 6 4.62% 20.77% S
41 5 3.85% 24.62%
42 11 8.46% 33.08%
43 12 9.23% 42.31%
44 9 6.92% 49.23%
45 5 3.85% 53.08%
46 11 8.46% 61.54%
47 18 13.85% 75.38%
48 9 6.92% 82.31%
49 6 4.62% 86.92%
50 7 5.38% 92.31%
51 3 2.31% 94.62%
52 3 2.31% 96.92%
53 2 1.54% 98.46%
54 1 0.77% 99.23%
55 0 0.00% 99.23%
56 1 0.77% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 130 100%
spd_form.xls
10:00-10:20AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
639
CITY OF OXNARD 92
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 10:25-10:40AM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 51 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 41 To 50 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 14
No. with Speed violations 8
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.41
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 47729
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3480
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 70'-105'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2 /direction north of Orchard. 3/direction south of Orchard, Raised Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW partial
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial /Stormwater Channel
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Wagon Wheel Rd / Vineyard Ave
at Orchard Pl
CVC 22358.6, railroad undercrossing/narrow
road, Reduce speed limit
640
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: at Orchard Pl
Between: Wagon Wheel Rd / Vineyard Ave Ref. # 92
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
19 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
20 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 50 mph
21 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
22 0 0.00% 0.00%
23 0 0.00% 0.00%
24 0 0.00% 0.00%
25 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
26 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 47
27 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
28 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.33
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 46
30 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 51
31 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 56
32 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 41 to 50
33 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 77.08%
34 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
35 0 0.00% 0.00%
36 1 0.69% 0.69%
37 0 0.00% 0.69%
38 1 0.69% 1.39%
39 3 2.08% 3.47%
40 4 2.78% 6.25%
41 7 4.86% 11.11%
42 14 9.72% 20.83%
43 8 5.56% 26.39% S
44 10 6.94% 33.33%
45 14 9.72% 43.06%
46 17 11.81% 54.86%
47 12 8.33% 63.19%
48 9 6.25% 69.44%
49 11 7.64% 77.08%
50 9 6.25% 83.33%
51 4 2.78% 86.11%
52 4 2.78% 88.89%
53 4 2.78% 91.67%
54 3 2.08% 93.75%
55 3 2.08% 95.83%
56 3 2.08% 97.92%
57 2 1.39% 99.31%
58 0 0.00% 99.31%
59 0 0.00% 99.31%
60 0 0.00% 99.31%
61 1 0.69% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 144 100%
spd_form.xls
10:25-10:40AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
641
CITY OF OXNARD 93
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 10:45 -11:00A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 39 To 48 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.0%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 15
No. with Speed violations 6
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.65
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 41305
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2695
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (at Orchard)
Road Width 105'-110'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G. SW on W/S only
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial /Railroad
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Vineyard Ave / Gonzales Rd
at Citrus Grove Lane
85th percentile speed
642
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: at Citrus Grove Lane
Between: Vineyard Ave / Gonzales Rd Ref. # 93
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 42
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.33
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 42
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 46
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 50
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 39 to 48
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 79.02%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 2 1.40% 1.40%
35 0 0.00% 1.40%
36 9 6.29% 7.69%
37 5 3.50% 11.19%
38 4 2.80% 13.99%
39 14 9.79% 23.78%
40 9 6.29% 30.07% S
41 17 11.89% 41.96%
42 24 16.78% 58.74%
43 8 5.59% 64.34%
44 14 9.79% 74.13%
45 8 5.59% 79.72%
46 9 6.29% 86.01%
47 5 3.50% 89.51%
48 5 3.50% 93.01%
49 5 3.50% 96.50%
50 1 0.70% 97.20%
51 2 1.40% 98.60%
52 2 1.40% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 143 100%
spd_form.xls
10:45 -11:00A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
643
CITY OF OXNARD 94
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 11:05-11:20 A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 36 To 45 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70.8%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 7
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.29
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 41305
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2865
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 86'-80'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3 N/B, 2 S/B, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G. SW partial on W/S
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial /Residential /Railroad
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Gonzales Rd / Robert Ave
at Glenwood Dr
85th percentile speed
644
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: at Glenwood Dr
Between: Gonzales Rd / Robert Ave Ref. # 94
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 41
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.43
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 42
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 46
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 50
29 1 0.73% 0.73% 10 Mile Pace: 36 to 45
30 2 1.46% 2.19% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 70.80%
31 1 0.73% 2.92% Comments:
32 1 0.73% 3.65%
33 2 1.46% 5.11%
34 2 1.46% 6.57%
35 6 4.38% 10.95%
36 9 6.57% 17.52%
37 7 5.11% 22.63%
38 12 8.76% 31.39%
39 10 7.30% 38.69%
40 4 2.92% 41.61% S
41 9 6.57% 48.18%
42 12 8.76% 56.93%
43 12 8.76% 65.69%
44 11 8.03% 73.72%
45 11 8.03% 81.75%
46 9 6.57% 88.32%
47 4 2.92% 91.24%
48 0 0.00% 91.24%
49 4 2.92% 94.16%
50 4 2.92% 97.08%
51 1 0.73% 97.81%
52 1 0.73% 98.54%
53 1 0.73% 99.27%
54 1 0.73% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 137 100%
spd_form.xls
11:05-11:20 A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
645
CITY OF OXNARD 95
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 11:25-11:45AM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 34 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 29 To 38 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 6
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.21
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 39111
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3490
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 80'-66'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G. SW all except W/S north of Colonia Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial /Railroad
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Robert Ave / Second St
s/o Cooper Rd
CVC 22358.6
646
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: s/o Cooper Rd
Between: Robert Ave / Second St Ref. # 95
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 1 0.60% 0.60% Mean Speed: 34
24 2 1.19% 1.79% Standard Deviation: 5
25 2 1.19% 2.98% Standard error of the mean: 0.39
26 2 1.19% 4.17% 50th Percentile: 34
27 7 4.17% 8.33% 85th Percentile: 39
28 3 1.79% 10.12% 97th Percentile: 42
29 11 6.55% 16.67% 10 Mile Pace: 29 to 38
30 8 4.76% 21.43% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 73.21%
31 9 5.36% 26.79% Comments:
32 11 6.55% 33.33%
33 15 8.93% 42.26%
34 17 10.12% 52.38%
35 11 6.55% 58.93%
36 17 10.12% 69.05%
37 11 6.55% 75.60%
38 13 7.74% 83.33%
39 11 6.55% 89.88%
40 3 1.79% 91.67% S
41 5 2.98% 94.64%
42 4 2.38% 97.02%
43 2 1.19% 98.21%
44 1 0.60% 98.81%
45 0 0.00% 98.81%
46 2 1.19% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 168 100%
spd_form.xls
11:25-11:45AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
647
CITY OF OXNARD 96
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 11:50AM-12:05PM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 37 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 28 To 37 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70.9%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 14
No. with Speed violations 6
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.93
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 30128
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2405
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 70'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Second St / Seventh St
at Fourth St
CVC 22358.8(a), high collision rate, keep
existing speed limit
648
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: at Fourth St
Between: Second St / Seventh St Ref. # 96
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY/ AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 2 1.16% 1.16%
21 1 0.58% 1.74%
22 3 1.74% 3.49% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 3 1.74% 5.23% Mean Speed: 33
24 3 1.74% 6.98% Standard Deviation: 5
25 3 1.74% 8.72% Standard error of the mean: 0.38
26 8 4.65% 13.37% 50th Percentile: 33
27 4 2.33% 15.70% 85th Percentile: 37
28 5 2.91% 18.60% 97th Percentile: 42
29 9 5.23% 23.84% 10 Mile Pace: 28 to 37
30 10 5.81% 29.65% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 70.93% 31 9 5.23% 34.88% Comments:
32 14 8.14% 43.02%
33 24 13.95% 56.98%
34 15 8.72% 65.70%
35 11 6.40% 72.09%
36 18 10.47% 82.56%
37 7 4.07% 86.63%
38 5 2.91% 89.53%
39 6 3.49% 93.02%
40 2 1.16% 94.19% S
41 4 2.33% 96.51%
42 4 2.33% 98.84%
43 1 0.58% 99.42%
44 0 0.00% 99.42%
45 1 0.58% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 172 100%
spd_form.xls
11:50AM-12:05PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
649
CITY OF OXNARD 97
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 12:10-12:25PM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 34 Existing Speed Zone 30 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Proposed Speed Zone 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 29 To 38 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.8%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 9
No. with Speed violations 4
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.40
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 16855
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1840
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 70'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2-3 S/B. 2 N/B, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Seventh St / Wooley Rd
at Ninth St
CVC 22358.8(a), high collision rate, keep
existing speed limit
650
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: at Ninth St
Between: Seventh St / Wooley Rd Ref. # 97
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 30 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 34
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 2 1.52% 1.52% 50th Percentile: 34
27 2 1.52% 3.03% 85th Percentile: 38
28 1 0.76% 3.79% 97th Percentile: 44
29 8 6.06% 9.85% 10 Mile Pace: 29 to 38
30 8 6.06% 15.91% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 81.82%
31 7 5.30% 21.21% Comments:
32 15 11.36% 32.58%
33 22 16.67% 49.24%
34 14 10.61% 59.85%
35 14 10.61% 70.45%
36 5 3.79% 74.24%
37 6 4.55% 78.79%
38 9 6.82% 85.61%
39 8 6.06% 91.67%
40 3 2.27% 93.94% S
41 1 0.76% 94.70%
42 2 1.52% 96.21%
43 1 0.76% 96.97%
44 2 1.52% 98.48%
45 1 0.76% 99.24%
46 0 0.00% 99.24%
47 1 0.76% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 132 100%
spd_form.xls
12:10-12:25PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
651
CITY OF OXNARD 98
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 1:20-1:35PM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 42 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77.1%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 22
No. with Speed violations 4
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.66
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 16855
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3785
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Wooley /Saviers) Road Width 75'
Parking Restriction Partial
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments RR crossing
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Wooley Rd / RR Tracks
1450 Oxnard Blvd
85th percentile speed
652
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: 1450 Oxnard Blvd
Between: Wooley Rd / RR Tracks Ref. # 98
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 38
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.33
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 38
27 2 1.39% 1.39% 85th Percentile: 42
28 2 1.39% 2.78% 97th Percentile: 47
29 2 1.39% 4.17% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 4 2.78% 6.94% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 77.08%
31 1 0.69% 7.64% Comments:
32 2 1.39% 9.03%
33 10 6.94% 15.97%
34 3 2.08% 18.06%
35 9 6.25% 24.31%
36 14 9.72% 34.03%
37 13 9.03% 43.06%
38 13 9.03% 52.08%
39 18 12.50% 64.58%
40 11 7.64% 72.22% S
41 9 6.25% 78.47%
42 11 7.64% 86.11%
43 4 2.78% 88.89%
44 5 3.47% 92.36%
45 4 2.78% 95.14%
46 2 1.39% 96.53%
47 2 1.39% 97.92%
48 1 0.69% 98.61%
49 2 1.39% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 144 100%
spd_form.xls
1:20-1:35PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
653
CITY OF OXNARD 99
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 1:40-2:00PM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 39 To 48 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80.5%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 15
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.30
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 14977
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3725
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 112'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Soil and painted median Improvement (SW, C & G) None
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd RR Tracks / Rose Ave
at Sunkist Dr
CVC 22358.6
654
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: at Sunkist Dr
Between: RR Tracks / Rose Ave Ref. # 99
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 44
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 43
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 48
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 52
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 39 to 48
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 80.45%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 0 0.00% 0.00%
36 3 2.26% 2.26%
37 4 3.01% 5.26%
38 3 2.26% 7.52%
39 8 6.02% 13.53%
40 8 6.02% 19.55% S
41 11 8.27% 27.82%
42 20 15.04% 42.86%
43 17 12.78% 55.64%
44 13 9.77% 65.41%
45 9 6.77% 72.18%
46 10 7.52% 79.70%
47 7 5.26% 84.96%
48 4 3.01% 87.97%
49 6 4.51% 92.48%
50 2 1.50% 93.98%
51 3 2.26% 96.24%
52 3 2.26% 98.50%
53 0 0.00% 98.50%
54 2 1.50% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 133 100%
spd_form.xls
1:40-2:00PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
655
CITY OF OXNARD 100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 2:05 -2:20P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 50 Existing Speed Zone 55 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 55 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 44 To 53 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74.1%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.68
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.91
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 14977
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1430
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Channel Islands Overpass) Road Width 135'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Soil and painted median Improvement (SW, C & G) None
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Rose Ave / Channel Islands Overpass
bt. Rose Ave + Channel Islands Overpass
CVC 22358.6, continuation of speed, Reduce
speed limit
656
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: bt. Rose Ave + Channel Islands Overpass
Between: Rose Ave / Channel Islands Overpass Ref. # 100 Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
35 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
36 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY AY
37 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 55 mph
38 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
39 0 0.00% 0.00%
40 0 0.00% 0.00%
41 0 0.00% 0.00%
42 2 1.72% 1.72% DATA ANALYSIS:
43 4 3.45% 5.17% Mean Speed: 50
44 5 4.31% 9.48% Standard Deviation: 4
45 4 3.45% 12.93% Standard error of the mean: 0.37
46 12 10.34% 23.28% 50th Percentile: 50
47 6 5.17% 28.45% 85th Percentile: 55
48 11 9.48% 37.93% 97th Percentile: 59
49 11 9.48% 47.41% 10 Mile Pace: 44 to 53
50 11 9.48% 56.90% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 74.14% 51 13 11.21% 68.10% Comments:
52 4 3.45% 71.55%
53 9 7.76% 79.31%
54 4 3.45% 82.76%
55 5 4.31% 87.07%
56 3 2.59% 89.66%
57 2 1.72% 91.38%
58 5 4.31% 95.69%
59 2 1.72% 97.41%
60 1 0.86% 98.28% S
61 1 0.86% 99.14%
62 1 0.86% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
75 0 0.00% 100.00%
76 0 0.00% 100.00%
77 0 0.00% 100.00%
78 0 0.00% 100.00%
79 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 116 100%
spd_form.xls
2:05 -2:20P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
657
CITY OF OXNARD 101
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 8/16/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 9:40 -10:20A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 56 Existing Speed Zone 60 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 59 Proposed Speed Zone 55 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 50 To 59 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80.3%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.91
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4575
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 112'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Soil and painted median Improvement (SW, C & G) None
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Farm Land
Comments
ID:
Oxnard Blvd Channel Islands Overpass / Pleasant Valley Rd 1500 E of Channel Islands Blvd
CVC 22358.6, Reduce speed limit
658
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Oxnard Blvd
Location: 1500 E of Channel Islands Blvd
Between: Channel Islands Overpass / Pleasant Valley Rd Ref. # 101 Cumulative Date: 8/16/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
35 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
36 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
37 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 60 mph
38 1 0.73% 0.73% Remarks:
39 0 0.00% 0.73%
40 1 0.73% 1.46%
41 0 0.00% 1.46%
42 1 0.73% 2.19% DATA ANALYSIS:
43 0 0.00% 2.19% Mean Speed: 55
44 1 0.73% 2.92% Standard Deviation: 5
45 0 0.00% 2.92% Standard error of the mean: 0.43
46 4 2.92% 5.84% 50th Percentile: 56
47 2 1.46% 7.30% 85th Percentile: 59
48 3 2.19% 9.49% 97th Percentile: 62
49 2 1.46% 10.95% 10 Mile Pace: 50 to 59
50 7 5.11% 16.06% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 80.29%
51 9 6.57% 22.63% Comments:
52 7 5.11% 27.74%
53 6 4.38% 32.12%
54 11 8.03% 40.15%
55 7 5.11% 45.26%
56 20 14.60% 59.85%
57 11 8.03% 67.88%
58 14 10.22% 78.10%
59 18 13.14% 91.24%
60 3 2.19% 93.43% S
61 2 1.46% 94.89%
62 4 2.92% 97.81%
63 2 1.46% 99.27%
64 0 0.00% 99.27%
65 1 0.73% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
75 0 0.00% 100.00%
76 0 0.00% 100.00%
77 0 0.00% 100.00%
78 0 0.00% 100.00%
79 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 137 100%
spd_form.xls
9:40 -10:20A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
659
CITY OF OXNARD 102
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 1:50-2:25PM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 29 To 38 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72.1%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.28
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Stop sign /Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3470
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Statham/Emerson) (Titan/Wooley) Road Width 60'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 1/direction, TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G . SW partial
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Pacific Ave Statham Blvd / Wooley Rd
at Beacon Pl
CVC 22358.8(a), continuation of speed, keep
existing speed limit
660
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Pacific Ave
Location: at Beacon Pl
Between: Statham Blvd / Wooley Rd Ref. # 102
Cumulative Date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 36
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 5
25 1 0.74% 0.74% Standard error of the mean: 0.43
26 1 0.74% 1.47% 50th Percentile: 36
27 2 1.47% 2.94% 85th Percentile: 42
28 0 0.00% 2.94% 97th Percentile: 45
29 7 5.15% 8.09% 10 Mile Pace: 29 to 38
30 6 4.41% 12.50% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 72.06%
31 7 5.15% 17.65% Comments:
32 5 3.68% 21.32%
33 10 7.35% 28.68%
34 6 4.41% 33.09%
35 11 8.09% 41.18%
36 22 16.18% 57.35%
37 12 8.82% 66.18%
38 12 8.82% 75.00%
39 3 2.21% 77.21%
40 6 4.41% 81.62% S
41 4 2.94% 84.56%
42 6 4.41% 88.97%
43 3 2.21% 91.18%
44 7 5.15% 96.32%
45 1 0.74% 97.06%
46 2 1.47% 98.53%
47 0 0.00% 98.53%
48 1 0.74% 99.26%
49 0 0.00% 99.26%
50 0 0.00% 99.26%
51 1 0.74% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 136 100%
spd_form.xls
1:50-2:25PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
661
CITY OF OXNARD 103
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 1:10-1:45PM
Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 30 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 36 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 26 To 35 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.37
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2630
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 50'-35'
Parking Restriction No parking on E/S S of Mountain View No. Lanes and Median 1/direction
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW (S of Mntn View and partial E/S N of Mntn View). None W/S N of Mntn View Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Pacific Ave Wooley Rd / Fifth St
at Mountain View Ave
85th percentile speed
662
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Pacific Ave
Location: at Mountain View Ave
Between: Wooley Rd / Fifth St Ref. # 103
Cumulative Date: 4/19/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 2 1.72% 1.72% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 1 0.86% 2.59% Mean Speed: 31
24 4 3.45% 6.03% Standard Deviation: 5
25 4 3.45% 9.48% Standard error of the mean: 0.46
26 10 8.62% 18.10% 50th Percentile: 30
27 11 9.48% 27.59% 85th Percentile: 36
28 7 6.03% 33.62% 97th Percentile: 41
29 14 12.07% 45.69% 10 Mile Pace: 26 to 35
30 9 7.76% 53.45% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 75.00%
31 10 8.62% 62.07% Comments:
32 9 7.76% 69.83%
33 8 6.90% 76.72%
34 2 1.72% 78.45%
35 7 6.03% 84.48%
36 4 3.45% 87.93%
37 4 3.45% 91.38%
38 2 1.72% 93.10%
39 1 0.86% 93.97%
40 3 2.59% 96.55% S
41 1 0.86% 97.41%
42 1 0.86% 98.28%
43 0 0.00% 98.28%
44 1 0.86% 99.14%
45 0 0.00% 99.14%
46 0 0.00% 99.14%
47 1 0.86% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 116 100%
spd_form.xls
1:10-1:45PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
663
CITY OF OXNARD 104
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/17/2022 Day: Thursday Hours: 2:35-3:05PM Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 41 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 45 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 37 To 46 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83.5%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations #REF!
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Stop sign
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4000
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Nebula/Gonzales) Road Width 63'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 1/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Farm Land /Residential
Comments
ID:
Patterson Rd Doris Ave / Gonzales Rd
at Nebula St
CVC 22358.8(a), continuation of speed, keep
existing speed limit
664
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Patterson Rd
Location: at Nebula St
Between: Doris Ave / Gonzales Rd Ref. # 104
Cumulative Date: 3/17/2022 Day: Thursday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 41
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.36
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 41
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 45
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 48
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 37 to 46
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 83.47%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 1 0.83% 0.83%
33 0 0.00% 0.83%
34 1 0.83% 1.65%
35 3 2.48% 4.13%
36 6 4.96% 9.09%
37 10 8.26% 17.36%
38 13 10.74% 28.10%
39 14 11.57% 39.67%
40 10 8.26% 47.93% S
41 10 8.26% 56.20%
42 15 12.40% 68.60%
43 8 6.61% 75.21%
44 6 4.96% 80.17%
45 8 6.61% 86.78%
46 7 5.79% 92.56%
47 4 3.31% 95.87%
48 3 2.48% 98.35%
49 1 0.83% 99.17%
50 1 0.83% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 121 100%
spd_form.xls
2:35-3:05PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
665
CITY OF OXNARD 105
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/17/2022 Day: Thursday Hours: 3:10-3:40PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 33 To 0 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.45
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3065
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Gonzales/Vineyard) Road Width 63'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 1/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use School /Residential /Recreational
Comments Thurgood Elem School no crosswalk.
Golf course no crosswalk
ID:
Patterson Rd Gonzales Rd / Vineyard Ave
at Bermuda Dunes Dr
85th percentile speed
666
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Patterson Rd
Location: at Bermuda Dunes Dr
Between: Gonzales Rd / Vineyard Ave Ref. # 105
Cumulative Date: 3/17/2022 Day: Thursday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 39
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.27
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 39
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 42
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 45
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 33 to 42
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 85.00%
31 1 0.83% 0.83% Comments:
32 1 0.83% 1.67%
33 7 5.83% 7.50%
34 9 7.50% 15.00%
35 3 2.50% 17.50%
36 13 10.83% 28.33%
37 7 5.83% 34.17%
38 13 10.83% 45.00%
39 22 18.33% 63.33%
40 10 8.33% 71.67% S
41 9 7.50% 79.17%
42 9 7.50% 86.67%
43 6 5.00% 91.67%
44 6 5.00% 96.67%
45 1 0.83% 97.50%
46 2 1.67% 99.17%
47 1 0.83% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 120 100%
spd_form.xls
3:10-3:40PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
667
CITY OF OXNARD 106
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 10:25 -10:55A 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 44 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 38 To 47 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.3%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.21
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3325
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical, slight (Jacktar/Windward) Road Width 77'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G. SW on W/S only
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Railroad
Comments
ID:
Patterson Rd Hemlock St / Wooley Rd
at Helm Dr
CVC 22358.6
668
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Patterson Rd
Location: at Helm Dr
Between: Hemlock St / Wooley Rd Ref. # 106
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 44
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.32
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 44
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 48
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 54
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 38 to 47
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.29%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 2 1.32% 1.32%
36 3 1.97% 3.29%
37 1 0.66% 3.95%
38 6 3.95% 7.89%
39 8 5.26% 13.16%
40 9 5.92% 19.08% S
41 9 5.92% 25.00%
42 19 12.50% 37.50%
43 16 10.53% 48.03%
44 20 13.16% 61.18%
45 14 9.21% 70.39%
46 8 5.26% 75.66%
47 10 6.58% 82.24%
48 5 3.29% 85.53%
49 6 3.95% 89.47%
50 6 3.95% 93.42%
51 0 0.00% 93.42%
52 3 1.97% 95.39%
53 0 0.00% 95.39%
54 4 2.63% 98.03%
55 2 1.32% 99.34%
56 1 0.66% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 152 100%
spd_form.xls
10:25 -10:55A
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
669
CITY OF OXNARD 107
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/17/2022 Day: Thursday Hours: 3:45-4:15PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 45 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 47 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 39 To 48 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87.7%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 1
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.26
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.17
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Roundabout in segment
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2605
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 80'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction to 1/direction at Dunkirk Dr, Raised Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments Roundabout at Dunkirk Dr
ID:
Patterson Rd Wooley Rd / Fifth St
at Oarfish Ln
85th percentile speed
670
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Patterson Rd
Location: at Oarfish Ln
Between: Wooley Rd / Fifth St Ref. # 107
Cumulative Date: 3/17/2022 Day: Thursday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 44
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.26
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 45
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 47
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 49
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 39 to 48
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 87.68%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 1 0.72% 0.72%
36 0 0.00% 0.72%
37 5 3.62% 4.35%
38 2 1.45% 5.80%
39 11 7.97% 13.77%
40 5 3.62% 17.39% S
41 7 5.07% 22.46%
42 12 8.70% 31.16%
43 9 6.52% 37.68%
44 16 11.59% 49.28%
45 18 13.04% 62.32%
46 27 19.57% 81.88%
47 8 5.80% 87.68%
48 8 5.80% 93.48%
49 5 3.62% 97.10%
50 1 0.72% 97.83%
51 0 0.00% 97.83%
52 1 0.72% 98.55%
53 0 0.00% 98.55%
54 2 1.45% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 138 100%
spd_form.xls
3:45-4:15PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
671
CITY OF OXNARD 108
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/26/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 12:15-12:50P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 29 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 33 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 23 To 32 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75.5%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.74
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal /Roundabout
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2805
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 63'
Parking Restriction None
No. Lanes and Median 1/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Commercial /Residential
Comments
ID:
Peninsula Rd So Terminal / Channel Islands Blvd
500' s/o Channel island
CVC 22358.8(a), keep existing speed limit
672
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Peninsula Rd
Location: 500' s/o Channel island
Between: So Terminal / Channel Islands Blvd Ref. # 108
Cumulative Date: 4/26/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 1 0.94% 0.94%
21 5 4.72% 5.66%
22 4 3.77% 9.43% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 4 3.77% 13.21% Mean Speed: 28
24 6 5.66% 18.87% Standard Deviation: 4
25 5 4.72% 23.58% Standard error of the mean: 0.39
26 9 8.49% 32.08% 50th Percentile: 29
27 6 5.66% 37.74% 85th Percentile: 33
28 12 11.32% 49.06% 97th Percentile: 36
29 11 10.38% 59.43% 10 Mile Pace: 23 to 32
30 11 10.38% 69.81% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 75.47% 31 10 9.43% 79.25% Comments:
32 6 5.66% 84.91%
33 1 0.94% 85.85%
34 5 4.72% 90.57%
35 6 5.66% 96.23%
36 2 1.89% 98.11%
37 2 1.89% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00% S
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 106 100%
spd_form.xls
12:15-12:50P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
673
CITY OF OXNARD 109
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 11:50AM-12:25PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 28 Existing Speed Zone 25 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 31 Proposed Speed Zone 25 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 22 To 31 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87.7%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 0
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.82
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2640
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 50'
Parking Restriction Partial
No. Lanes and Median 1/direction, Painted
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type Controlled school crosswalk
Adjacent Land use Residential /School
Comments Art Haycox Elem STOP controlled crosswalk
ID:
Perkins Road Hueneme Ave / Pleasant Valley Rd
at Fairbourne Pl
CVC 22358.8(a), school safety, keep existing
speed limit
674
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Perkins Road
Location: at Fairbourne Pl
Between: Hueneme Ave / Pleasant Valley Rd Ref. # 109
Cumulative Date: 5/18/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 25 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 3 2.63% 2.63%
22 6 5.26% 7.89% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 6 5.26% 13.16% Mean Speed: 28
24 6 5.26% 18.42% Standard Deviation: 3
25 5 4.39% 22.81% Standard error of the mean: 0.28
26 14 12.28% 35.09% 50th Percentile: 28
27 14 12.28% 47.37% 85th Percentile: 31
28 15 13.16% 60.53% 97th Percentile: 33
29 16 14.04% 74.56% 10 Mile Pace: 22 to 31
30 10 8.77% 83.33% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 87.72% 31 8 7.02% 90.35% Comments:
32 6 5.26% 95.61%
33 2 1.75% 97.37%
34 0 0.00% 97.37%
35 1 0.88% 98.25%
36 2 1.75% 100.00%
37 0 0.00% 100.00%
38 0 0.00% 100.00%
39 0 0.00% 100.00%
40 0 0.00% 100.00% S
41 0 0.00% 100.00%
42 0 0.00% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 114 100%
spd_form.xls
11:50AM-12:25PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
675
CITY OF OXNARD 110
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:05-3:35PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 30 To 39 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83.6%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 9
No. with Speed violations 4
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.92
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 19062
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2485
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Horizontal slight at J St Road Width 72'-60'
Parking Restriction Some. Most no parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, TWLT
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Commercial
Comments
ID:
Pleasant Valley Rd J Street / Saviers Rd
at Perkins Rd
CVC 22358.6
676
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Pleasant Valley Rd
Location: at Perkins Rd
Between: J Street / Saviers Rd Ref. # 110
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 35
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 1 0.75% 0.75% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 2 1.49% 2.24% 50th Percentile: 35
27 0 0.00% 2.24% 85th Percentile: 38
28 1 0.75% 2.99% 97th Percentile: 41
29 5 3.73% 6.72% 10 Mile Pace: 30 to 39
30 4 2.99% 9.70% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 83.58%
31 10 7.46% 17.16% Comments:
32 10 7.46% 24.63%
33 15 11.19% 35.82%
34 15 11.19% 47.01%
35 14 10.45% 57.46%
36 18 13.43% 70.90%
37 7 5.22% 76.12%
38 12 8.96% 85.07%
39 7 5.22% 90.30%
40 4 2.99% 93.28% S
41 6 4.48% 97.76%
42 3 2.24% 100.00%
43 0 0.00% 100.00%
44 0 0.00% 100.00%
45 0 0.00% 100.00%
46 0 0.00% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 134 100%
spd_form.xls
3:05-3:35PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
677
CITY OF OXNARD 111
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 1:46-2:20PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 35 Existing Speed Zone 35 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 38 Proposed Speed Zone 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 30 To 39 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88.6%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 8
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.85
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 20374
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2230
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 49'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Painted
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
Pleasant Valley Rd Saviers Rd / Squires Dr
at Cloyne St
CVC 22358.6
678
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Pleasant Valley Rd
Location: at Cloyne St
Between: Saviers Rd / Squires Dr Ref. # 111
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 35 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 35
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 3
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.23
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 35
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 38
28 1 0.60% 0.60% 97th Percentile: 41
29 4 2.41% 3.01% 10 Mile Pace: 30 to 39
30 10 6.02% 9.04% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 88.55%
31 4 2.41% 11.45% Comments:
32 14 8.43% 19.88%
33 25 15.06% 34.94%
34 16 9.64% 44.58%
35 20 12.05% 56.63%
36 23 13.86% 70.48%
37 11 6.63% 77.11%
38 16 9.64% 86.75%
39 8 4.82% 91.57%
40 4 2.41% 93.98% S
41 6 3.61% 97.59%
42 0 0.00% 97.59%
43 0 0.00% 97.59%
44 1 0.60% 98.19%
45 1 0.60% 98.80%
46 2 1.20% 100.00%
47 0 0.00% 100.00%
48 0 0.00% 100.00%
49 0 0.00% 100.00%
50 0 0.00% 100.00%
51 0 0.00% 100.00%
52 0 0.00% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 166 100%
spd_form.xls
1:46-2:20PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25
30Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
679
CITY OF OXNARD 112
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 3:40-4:10P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 39 To 48 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.4%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 16
No. with Speed violations 3
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.32
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 16206
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3610
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Longfellow/Terrace) Road Width 85'-76'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW S/S, C&G&SW only from Squires/Terrace N/S Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Stormwater Channel
Comments
ID:
Pleasant Valley Rd Squires Dr / Rose Ave
300 ft s/o Terrace Ave
85th percentile speed
680
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Pleasant Valley Rd
Location: 300 ft s/o Terrace Ave
Between: Squires Dr / Rose Ave Ref. # 112
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 43
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.3
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 43
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 46
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 50
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 39 to 48
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 79.43%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 2 1.14% 1.14%
35 2 1.14% 2.29%
36 7 4.00% 6.29%
37 7 4.00% 10.29%
38 7 4.00% 14.29%
39 16 9.14% 23.43%
40 11 6.29% 29.71% S
41 8 4.57% 34.29%
42 19 10.86% 45.14%
43 20 11.43% 56.57%
44 15 8.57% 65.14%
45 21 12.00% 77.14%
46 14 8.00% 85.14%
47 7 4.00% 89.14%
48 8 4.57% 93.71%
49 5 2.86% 96.57%
50 1 0.57% 97.14%
51 0 0.00% 97.14%
52 4 2.29% 99.43%
53 1 0.57% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 175 100%
spd_form.xls
3:40-4:10P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
681
CITY OF OXNARD 113
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday Hours: 2:50 -3:10P 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 50 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 41 To 50 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.7%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.23
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 16206
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2555
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 76'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW S/S only
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Stormwater Channel
Comments
ID:
Pleasant Valley Rd Rose Ave / Bard Rd
at Syracuse Dr
CVC 22358.8(a), continuation of speed, keep
existing speed limit
682
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Pleasant Valley Rd
Location: at Syracuse Dr
Between: Rose Ave / Bard Rd Ref. # 113
Cumulative Date: 4/15/2022 Day: Friday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 46
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 46
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 50
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 53
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 41 to 50
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.74%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 0 0.00% 0.00%
36 0 0.00% 0.00%
37 1 0.79% 0.79%
38 4 3.15% 3.94%
39 3 2.36% 6.30%
40 5 3.94% 10.24% S
41 5 3.94% 14.17%
42 9 7.09% 21.26%
43 8 6.30% 27.56%
44 8 6.30% 33.86%
45 7 5.51% 39.37%
46 22 17.32% 56.69%
47 7 5.51% 62.20%
48 15 11.81% 74.02%
49 13 10.24% 84.25%
50 6 4.72% 88.98%
51 5 3.94% 92.91%
52 5 3.94% 96.85%
53 2 1.57% 98.43%
54 0 0.00% 98.43%
55 1 0.79% 99.21%
56 1 0.79% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 127 100%
spd_form.xls
2:50 -3:10P
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
683
CITY OF OXNARD 114
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday Hours: 2:30-3:00PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 47 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 38 To 47 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.1%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 7
No. with Speed violations 3
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.61
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 16206
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3410
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 70'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential
Comments
ID:
Pleasant Valley Rd Bard Rd / SR-1
at Coastal Village
85th percentile speed
684
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Pleasant Valley Rd
Location: at Coastal Village
Between: Bard Rd / SR-1 Ref. # 114
Cumulative Date: 3/22/2022 Day: Tuesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 43
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 43
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 47
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 50
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 38 to 47
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 79.10%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 1 0.75% 0.75%
34 0 0.00% 0.75%
35 1 0.75% 1.49%
36 3 2.24% 3.73%
37 4 2.99% 6.72%
38 9 6.72% 13.43%
39 14 10.45% 23.88%
40 10 7.46% 31.34% S
41 6 4.48% 35.82%
42 18 13.43% 49.25%
43 9 6.72% 55.97%
44 5 3.73% 59.70%
45 15 11.19% 70.90%
46 11 8.21% 79.10%
47 9 6.72% 85.82%
48 3 2.24% 88.06%
49 7 5.22% 93.28%
50 5 3.73% 97.01%
51 2 1.49% 98.51%
52 1 0.75% 99.25%
53 1 0.75% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 134 100%
spd_form.xls
2:30-3:00PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
685
CITY OF OXNARD 115
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 11:05-11:25AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 52 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 43 To 52 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72.7%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 10
No. with Speed violations 6
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.40
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 35316
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3400
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 89'-104'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/SB, 2-3NB, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW W/S. C&G&SW only from Sturgis/Camino E/S Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial /Farm Land
Comments
ID:
Rice Ave Fifth St / Camino Del Sol
at Sturgis Rd
85th percentile speed
686
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rice Ave
Location: at Sturgis Rd
Between: Fifth St / Camino Del Sol Ref. # 115
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
35 1 0.72% 0.72% Hours:
36 0 0.00% 0.72% Recorder: EY /AY
37 2 1.44% 2.16% Posted Speed: 50 mph
38 3 2.16% 4.32% Remarks:
39 4 2.88% 7.19%
40 2 1.44% 8.63%
41 2 1.44% 10.07%
42 5 3.60% 13.67% DATA ANALYSIS:
43 11 7.91% 21.58% Mean Speed: 48
44 5 3.60% 25.18% Standard Deviation: 5
45 5 3.60% 28.78% Standard error of the mean: 0.42
46 9 6.47% 35.25% 50th Percentile: 48
47 11 7.91% 43.17% 85th Percentile: 52
48 13 9.35% 52.52% 97th Percentile: 57
49 15 10.79% 63.31% 10 Mile Pace: 43 to 52
50 11 7.91% 71.22% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 72.66% 51 11 7.91% 79.14% Comments:
52 10 7.19% 86.33%
53 3 2.16% 88.49%
54 6 4.32% 92.81%
55 3 2.16% 94.96%
56 2 1.44% 96.40%
57 1 0.72% 97.12%
58 1 0.72% 97.84%
59 0 0.00% 97.84%
60 0 0.00% 97.84% S
61 1 0.72% 98.56%
62 1 0.72% 99.28%
63 1 0.72% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
75 0 0.00% 100.00%
76 0 0.00% 100.00%
77 0 0.00% 100.00%
78 0 0.00% 100.00%
79 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 139 100%
spd_form.xls
11:05-11:25AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
687
CITY OF OXNARD 116
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 10:42-11:00AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 47 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 53 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 42 To 51 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65.0%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.20
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 40986
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1750
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 101'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial
Comments
ID:
Rice Ave Camino Del Sol / Latigo Ave
700' s/o Latigo Ave
CVC 22358.6
688
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rice Ave
Location: 700' s/o Latigo Ave
Between: Camino Del Sol / Latigo Ave Ref. # 116
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
35 1 0.61% 0.61% Hours:
36 1 0.61% 1.23% Recorder: EY /AY
37 3 1.84% 3.07% Posted Speed: 50 mph
38 5 3.07% 6.13% Remarks:
39 1 0.61% 6.75%
40 5 3.07% 9.82%
41 4 2.45% 12.27%
42 9 5.52% 17.79% DATA ANALYSIS:
43 12 7.36% 25.15% Mean Speed: 47
44 8 4.91% 30.06% Standard Deviation: 5
45 8 4.91% 34.97% Standard error of the mean: 0.39
46 12 7.36% 42.33% 50th Percentile: 47
47 13 7.98% 50.31% 85th Percentile: 53
48 10 6.13% 56.44% 97th Percentile: 58
49 13 7.98% 64.42% 10 Mile Pace: 42 to 51
50 12 7.36% 71.78% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 65.03% 51 9 5.52% 77.30% Comments:
52 7 4.29% 81.60%
53 11 6.75% 88.34%
54 5 3.07% 91.41%
55 4 2.45% 93.87%
56 3 1.84% 95.71%
57 1 0.61% 96.32%
58 2 1.23% 97.55%
59 2 1.23% 98.77%
60 0 0.00% 98.77% S
61 1 0.61% 99.39%
62 0 0.00% 99.39%
63 1 0.61% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
75 0 0.00% 100.00%
76 0 0.00% 100.00%
77 0 0.00% 100.00%
78 0 0.00% 100.00%
79 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 163 100%
spd_form.xls
10:42-11:00AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
689
CITY OF OXNARD 117
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 10:00-10:24AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 53 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 43 To 52 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67.2%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 4
No. with Speed violations 3
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.17
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 40986
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2850
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 88'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/SB, 2/NB, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW on W/S only
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial /Farm Land
Comments
ID:
Rice Ave Latigo Ave / Gonzales Rd
at Sakioka Dr
CVC 22358.6
690
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rice Ave
Location: at Sakioka Dr
Between: Latigo Ave / Gonzales Rd Ref. # 117
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
35 1 0.55% 0.55% Hours:
36 2 1.09% 1.64% Recorder: EY /AY
37 2 1.09% 2.73% Posted Speed: 50 mph
38 2 1.09% 3.83% Remarks:
39 2 1.09% 4.92%
40 5 2.73% 7.65%
41 7 3.83% 11.48%
42 10 5.46% 16.94% DATA ANALYSIS:
43 13 7.10% 24.04% Mean Speed: 48
44 14 7.65% 31.69% Standard Deviation: 5
45 7 3.83% 35.52% Standard error of the mean: 0.37
46 11 6.01% 41.53% 50th Percentile: 48
47 5 2.73% 44.26% 85th Percentile: 53
48 13 7.10% 51.37% 97th Percentile: 57
49 21 11.48% 62.84% 10 Mile Pace: 43 to 52
50 12 6.56% 69.40% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 67.21% 51 11 6.01% 75.41% Comments:
52 16 8.74% 84.15%
53 6 3.28% 87.43%
54 6 3.28% 90.71%
55 9 4.92% 95.63%
56 1 0.55% 96.17%
57 3 1.64% 97.81%
58 1 0.55% 98.36%
59 0 0.00% 98.36%
60 1 0.55% 98.91% S
61 1 0.55% 99.45%
62 1 0.55% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
75 0 0.00% 100.00%
76 0 0.00% 100.00%
77 0 0.00% 100.00%
78 0 0.00% 100.00%
79 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 183 100%
spd_form.xls
10:00-10:24AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
691
CITY OF OXNARD 118
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 9:30-9:55AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Existing Speed Zone 50 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 53 Proposed Speed Zone 50 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 44 To 53 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74.0%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 3
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.23
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 49898
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 1245
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical
Road Width 123'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial /Farm Land
Comments
ID:
Rice Ave Gonzales Rd / 101 SB
w/o Gonzales Rd
CVC 22358.6
692
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rice Ave
Location: w/o Gonzales Rd
Between: Gonzales Rd / 101 SB Ref. # 118
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
35 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
36 1 0.51% 0.51% Recorder: EY /AY
37 1 0.51% 1.02% Posted Speed: 50 mph
38 1 0.51% 1.53% Remarks:
39 4 2.04% 3.57%
40 4 2.04% 5.61%
41 4 2.04% 7.65%
42 7 3.57% 11.22% DATA ANALYSIS:
43 6 3.06% 14.29% Mean Speed: 49
44 9 4.59% 18.88% Standard Deviation: 5
45 6 3.06% 21.94% Standard error of the mean: 0.36
46 18 9.18% 31.12% 50th Percentile: 49
47 16 8.16% 39.29% 85th Percentile: 53
48 16 8.16% 47.45% 97th Percentile: 59
49 21 10.71% 58.16% 10 Mile Pace: 44 to 53
50 16 8.16% 66.33% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 73.98% 51 15 7.65% 73.98% Comments:
52 16 8.16% 82.14%
53 12 6.12% 88.27%
54 6 3.06% 91.33%
55 3 1.53% 92.86%
56 5 2.55% 95.41%
57 2 1.02% 96.43%
58 1 0.51% 96.94%
59 1 0.51% 97.45%
60 3 1.53% 98.98% S
61 2 1.02% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
75 0 0.00% 100.00%
76 0 0.00% 100.00%
77 0 0.00% 100.00%
78 0 0.00% 100.00%
79 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 196 100%
spd_form.xls
9:30-9:55AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
693
CITY OF OXNARD 119
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 9:05-9:24AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 40 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 44 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 37 To 46 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.5%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 1
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.52
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 20000
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 920
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical
Road Width 102'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/SB, 2/NB, Painted
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type None
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Freeway
Comments
ID:
Rice Ave 101 SB / City Limits
500 ft W of 101 SB
CVC 22358.6
694
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rice Ave
Location: 500 ft W of 101 SB
Between: 101 SB / City Limits Ref. # 119
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 40
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.34
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 40
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 44
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 48
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 37 to 46
30 1 0.74% 0.74% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 78.52%
31 1 0.74% 1.48% Comments:
32 4 2.96% 4.44%
33 2 1.48% 5.93%
34 4 2.96% 8.89%
35 3 2.22% 11.11%
36 5 3.70% 14.81%
37 5 3.70% 18.52%
38 11 8.15% 26.67%
39 20 14.81% 41.48%
40 14 10.37% 51.85% S
41 8 5.93% 57.78%
42 18 13.33% 71.11%
43 12 8.89% 80.00%
44 9 6.67% 86.67%
45 2 1.48% 88.15%
46 7 5.19% 93.33%
47 3 2.22% 95.56%
48 3 2.22% 97.78%
49 1 0.74% 98.52%
50 0 0.00% 98.52%
51 0 0.00% 98.52%
52 2 1.48% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 135 100%
spd_form.xls
9:05-9:24AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
695
CITY OF OXNARD 120
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 12:45-1:05PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 42 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 46 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 37 To 46 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.8%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.18
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 20644
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2590
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Sanford/Pleasant Valley) Road Width 95'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Commercial
Comments Fred L Williams Elm NOT adjacent
ID:
Rose Ave Sanford St / Bard Rd
at Pleasant Valley Rd
85th percentile speed
696
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rose Ave
Location: at Pleasant Valley Rd
Between: Sanford St / Bard Rd Ref. # 120
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 42
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.36
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 42
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 46
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 49
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 37 to 46
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 84.80%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 3 2.40% 2.40%
36 3 2.40% 4.80%
37 6 4.80% 9.60%
38 8 6.40% 16.00%
39 14 11.20% 27.20%
40 11 8.80% 36.00% S
41 10 8.00% 44.00%
42 13 10.40% 54.40%
43 14 11.20% 65.60%
44 14 11.20% 76.80%
45 8 6.40% 83.20%
46 8 6.40% 89.60%
47 4 3.20% 92.80%
48 4 3.20% 96.00%
49 2 1.60% 97.60%
50 2 1.60% 99.20%
51 0 0.00% 99.20%
52 1 0.80% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 125 100%
spd_form.xls
12:45-1:05PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
697
CITY OF OXNARD 121
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 12:20-12:40PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 44 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 39 To 48 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.2%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 10
No. with Speed violations 4
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.46
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 25704
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4060
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (N Campus Rd/Raiders) Road Width 95'
Parking Restriction Yes
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /College /High School /Park Comments Oxnard College, uncontrolled crosswalk
Channel Islands High School, signal controlled crosswalk College Park, signal controlled crosswalk
ID:
Rose Ave Bard Rd / Channel Islands Blvd
at N Campus Rd
CVC 22358.6
698
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rose Ave
Location: at N Campus Rd
Between: Bard Rd / Channel Islands Blvd Ref. # 121
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 44
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.31
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 44
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 48
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 52
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 39 to 48
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 81.21%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 0 0.00% 0.00%
36 2 1.21% 1.21%
37 3 1.82% 3.03%
38 8 4.85% 7.88%
39 7 4.24% 12.12%
40 8 4.85% 16.97% S
41 8 4.85% 21.82%
42 19 11.52% 33.33%
43 18 10.91% 44.24%
44 17 10.30% 54.55%
45 18 10.91% 65.45%
46 17 10.30% 75.76%
47 12 7.27% 83.03%
48 10 6.06% 89.09%
49 4 2.42% 91.52%
50 5 3.03% 94.55%
51 2 1.21% 95.76%
52 5 3.03% 98.79%
53 2 1.21% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 165 100%
spd_form.xls
12:20-12:40PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
699
CITY OF OXNARD 122
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 11:55AM-12:15PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 45 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 49 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 41 To 50 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.2%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 5
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.26
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 26963
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3385
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (at Oxnard) (Fiske/Emerson) Road Width 105'-95'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 3/NB, 2/SB, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Industrial /Commercial
Comments
ID:
Rose Ave Channel Islands Blvd / Emerson Ave
at Ives Ave
CVC 22358.6
700
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rose Ave
Location: at Ives Ave
Between: Channel Islands Blvd / Emerson Ave Ref. # 122
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 45
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.34
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 45
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 49
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 53
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 41 to 50
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 84.17%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 0 0.00% 0.00%
36 1 0.72% 0.72%
37 1 0.72% 1.44%
38 2 1.44% 2.88%
39 2 1.44% 4.32%
40 4 2.88% 7.19% S
41 6 4.32% 11.51%
42 18 12.95% 24.46%
43 15 10.79% 35.25%
44 12 8.63% 43.88%
45 13 9.35% 53.24%
46 14 10.07% 63.31%
47 13 9.35% 72.66%
48 12 8.63% 81.29%
49 9 6.47% 87.77%
50 5 3.60% 91.37%
51 3 2.16% 93.53%
52 4 2.88% 96.40%
53 2 1.44% 97.84%
54 2 1.44% 99.28%
55 1 0.72% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 139 100%
spd_form.xls
11:55AM-12:15PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
701
CITY OF OXNARD 123
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 11:30-11:50AM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 45 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 50 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 41 To 50 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.8%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 2
No. with Speed violations 0
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.13
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 26963
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2660
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 80'-95'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW on W/S only
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial /Farm Land
Comments
ID:
Rose Ave Emerson Dr / Wooley Rd
at Westar Dr
CVC 22358.8(a), continuation of speed, keep
existing speed limit
702
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rose Ave
Location: at Westar Dr
Between: Emerson Dr / Wooley Rd Ref. # 123
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 46
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.35
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 45
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 50
28 0 0.00% 0.00% 97th Percentile: 56
29 0 0.00% 0.00% 10 Mile Pace: 41 to 50
30 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 79.84%
31 0 0.00% 0.00% Comments:
32 0 0.00% 0.00%
33 0 0.00% 0.00%
34 0 0.00% 0.00%
35 1 0.78% 0.78%
36 2 1.55% 2.33%
37 1 0.78% 3.10%
38 0 0.00% 3.10%
39 3 2.33% 5.43%
40 3 2.33% 7.75% S
41 10 7.75% 15.50%
42 11 8.53% 24.03%
43 9 6.98% 31.01%
44 12 9.30% 40.31%
45 15 11.63% 51.94%
46 12 9.30% 61.24%
47 9 6.98% 68.22%
48 5 3.88% 72.09%
49 10 7.75% 79.84%
50 10 7.75% 87.60%
51 4 3.10% 90.70%
52 4 3.10% 93.80%
53 2 1.55% 95.35%
54 0 0.00% 95.35%
55 2 1.55% 96.90%
56 1 0.78% 97.67%
57 0 0.00% 97.67%
58 3 2.33% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 129 100%
spd_form.xls
11:30-11:50AM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
703
CITY OF OXNARD 124
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 1:40-2:00PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 nph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 37 To 46 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 4
No. with Speed violations 2
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.23
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.90
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 32227
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 2610
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Mountain View/5th) Road Width 73'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW on W/S only
Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial /Fam Land
Comments
ID:
Rose Ave Fifth St / Wooley Rd
at Mountain View Ave
CVC 22358.6
704
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rose Ave
Location: at Mountain View Ave
Between: Fifth St / Wooley Rd Ref. # 124
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
26 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
27 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 45 mph
28 1 0.59% 0.59% Remarks:
29 0 0.00% 0.59%
30 0 0.00% 0.59%
31 1 0.59% 1.18%
32 0 0.00% 1.18% DATA ANALYSIS:
33 0 0.00% 1.18% Mean Speed: 43
34 0 0.00% 1.18% Standard Deviation: 5
35 4 2.35% 3.53% Standard error of the mean: 0.38
36 7 4.12% 7.65% 50th Percentile: 43
37 8 4.71% 12.35% 85th Percentile: 48
38 8 4.71% 17.06% 97th Percentile: 53
39 15 8.82% 25.88% 10 Mile Pace: 37 to 46
40 13 7.65% 33.53% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 70.00% 41 8 4.71% 38.24% Comments:
42 19 11.18% 49.41%
43 12 7.06% 56.47%
44 12 7.06% 63.53%
45 12 7.06% 70.59%
46 12 7.06% 77.65%
47 8 4.71% 82.35%
48 8 4.71% 87.06%
49 5 2.94% 90.00%
50 7 4.12% 94.12% S
51 2 1.18% 95.29%
52 2 1.18% 96.47%
53 1 0.59% 97.06%
54 3 1.76% 98.82%
55 1 0.59% 99.41%
56 0 0.00% 99.41%
57 0 0.00% 99.41%
58 0 0.00% 99.41%
59 0 0.00% 99.41%
60 1 0.59% 100.00%
61 0 0.00% 100.00%
62 0 0.00% 100.00%
63 0 0.00% 100.00%
64 0 0.00% 100.00%
65 0 0.00% 100.00%
66 0 0.00% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 170 100%
spd_form.xls
1:40-2:00PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 18
20Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
705
CITY OF OXNARD 125
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 2:05-2:25PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 39 Existing Speed Zone 40 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Proposed Speed Zone 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 35 To 44 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80.8%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 11
No. with Speed violations 4
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.42
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 36899
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 3405
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment None
Road Width 90'-85'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2/SB, 3-2/NB, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) Yes
Bicycle lanes/Type Class III
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Industrial /Residential /Park
Comments Del Sol Park signal controlled crosswalk
ID:
Rose Ave Fifth St / Camino Del Sol
at La Puerta Ave
CVC 22358.6
706
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rose Ave
Location: at La Puerta Ave
Between: Fifth St / Camino Del Sol Ref. # 125
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
15 0 0.00% 0.00% Hours:
16 0 0.00% 0.00% Recorder: EY /AY
17 0 0.00% 0.00% Posted Speed: 40 mph
18 0 0.00% 0.00% Remarks:
19 0 0.00% 0.00%
20 0 0.00% 0.00%
21 0 0.00% 0.00%
22 0 0.00% 0.00% DATA ANALYSIS:
23 0 0.00% 0.00% Mean Speed: 39
24 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard Deviation: 4
25 0 0.00% 0.00% Standard error of the mean: 0.32
26 0 0.00% 0.00% 50th Percentile: 39
27 0 0.00% 0.00% 85th Percentile: 43
28 1 0.64% 0.64% 97th Percentile: 48
29 0 0.00% 0.64% 10 Mile Pace: 35 to 44
30 2 1.28% 1.92% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 80.77%
31 1 0.64% 2.56% Comments:
32 3 1.92% 4.49%
33 4 2.56% 7.05%
34 4 2.56% 9.62%
35 9 5.77% 15.38%
36 20 12.82% 28.21%
37 10 6.41% 34.62%
38 14 8.97% 43.59%
39 21 13.46% 57.05%
40 17 10.90% 67.95% S
41 9 5.77% 73.72%
42 15 9.62% 83.33%
43 6 3.85% 87.18%
44 5 3.21% 90.38%
45 3 1.92% 92.31%
46 4 2.56% 94.87%
47 2 1.28% 96.15%
48 3 1.92% 98.08%
49 1 0.64% 98.72%
50 1 0.64% 99.36%
51 0 0.00% 99.36%
52 1 0.64% 100.00%
53 0 0.00% 100.00%
54 0 0.00% 100.00%
55 0 0.00% 100.00%
56 0 0.00% 100.00%
57 0 0.00% 100.00%
58 0 0.00% 100.00%
59 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 156 100%
spd_form.xls
2:05-2:25PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
707
CITY OF OXNARD 126
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street: From/To:
Survey date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday Hours: 2:30-2:45PM 0 0 Location of survey:
SPEED DATA
50th Percentile Speed (mph) 43 Existing Speed Zone 45 mph 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 48 Proposed Speed Zone 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed (mph) 39 To 48 Justification
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77.5%
COLLISION HISTORY (2017-2019)
Number of Years 3 years
Total Collisions (Midblock) 29
No. with Speed violations 6
Predominant type
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.76
Expected Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 39672
Traffic Control Type Traffic signal
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Segment Length (Feet) 4635
Vertical/Horizontal Alignment Vertical (Cesar Chavez/McGrath) Road Width 68'-113'
Parking Restriction No parking
No. Lanes and Median 2-3/direction, Raised
Improvement (SW, C & G) C&G&SW on W/S, C&G&SW only at Cesar Chavez/Gonzales Bicycle lanes/Type Class II
Crosswalks/Type
Adjacent Land use Residential /Farm Land /Hospital /Commercial Comments
ID:
Rose Ave Camino Del Sol / Gonzales Rd
500' n/o Cesar Chavez Dr
CVC 22358.6
708
CITY OF OXNARD - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./TRAFFIC DIV. SPOT SPEED STUDY Street: Rose Ave
Location: 500' n/o Cesar Chavez Dr
Between: Camino Del Sol / Gonzales Rd Ref. # 126
Cumulative Date: 3/30/2022 Day: Wednesday
Speed Frequency Percent Percent Weather: Clear
35 2 1.18% 1.18% Hours:
36 4 2.37% 3.55% Recorder: EY
37 3 1.78% 5.33% Posted Speed: 45 mph
38 6 3.55% 8.88% Remarks:
39 15 8.88% 17.75%
40 10 5.92% 23.67%
41 12 7.10% 30.77%
42 23 13.61% 44.38% DATA ANALYSIS:
43 14 8.28% 52.66% Mean Speed: 44
44 15 8.88% 61.54% Standard Deviation: 4
45 10 5.92% 67.46% Standard error of the mean: 0.31
46 14 8.28% 75.74% 50th Percentile: 43
47 9 5.33% 81.07% 85th Percentile: 48
48 9 5.33% 86.39% 97th Percentile: 50
49 13 7.69% 94.08% 10 Mile Pace: 39 to 48
50 5 2.96% 97.04% % of Samples in 10-Mile Pace: 77.51%
51 0 0.00% 97.04% Comments:
52 1 0.59% 97.63%
53 0 0.00% 97.63%
54 1 0.59% 98.22%
55 0 0.00% 98.22%
56 0 0.00% 98.22%
57 1 0.59% 98.82%
58 0 0.00% 98.82%
59 0 0.00% 98.82%
60 1 0.59% 99.41% S
61 0 0.00% 99.41%
62 0 0.00% 99.41%
63 0 0.00% 99.41%
64 0 0.00% 99.41%
65 0 0.00% 99.41%
66 1 0.59% 100.00%
67 0 0.00% 100.00%
68 0 0.00% 100.00%
69 0 0.00% 100.00%
70 0 0.00% 100.00%
71 0 0.00% 100.00%
72 0 0.00% 100.00%
73 0 0.00% 100.00%
74 0 0.00% 100.00%
75 0 0.00% 100.00%
76 0 0.00% 100.00%
77 0 0.00% 100.00%
78 0 0.00% 100.00%
79 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total: 169 100%
spd_form.xls
2:30-2:45PM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120% Cumulative Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
0 5
10 15
20 25Frequency
Spot Speed, mph
Frequency Distribution
709
CITY OF OXNARD 127