Oxnard City Council
March 21, 2023

VCAPCD and the Ventura Council Association of Governments (VCOG) are is responsible for preparing the air quality management plan (AQMP), which addresses federal and state Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.

The proposed Project is located within the Ventura County portion of the SCCAB, which is under the jurisdiction of the VCAPCD for air quality planning and control. As such, VCAPCD’s 2016 AQMP is the applicable air quality plan for the proposed Project.

Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by the VCAPCD VCOG are deemed consistent with the AQMP growth projections, since the forecast assumptions by VCAPCD VCOG forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP. Additionally, because VCAPCD’s VCOG’s regional growth forecasts are based upon, among other things, land uses designated in general plans, a project that is consistent with the land use designated in a general plan would also be consistent with the VCAPCD’s VCOG’s regional forecast projections, and thus also with the AQMP growth projections.

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Construction activities involving vegetation removal as well as installation of the proposed billboard shall be conducted between September 16 and December January 31, outside the typical nesting season for birds and raptors in the region. If vegetation removal or installation must occur during the typical nesting season (January February 1 – September 15 August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for active nests within areas that will be subject to vegetation removal, construction noise, and/or ground disturbances, including a 100 to 3 500-foot buffer around existing trees and landscaped areas, to identify any potential active nests 1296

4. Errata
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 4-2 ESA / 202000387.01 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
within seven days prior to work activities. Buffer distances can be adjusted at the discretion of the biologist based on the location of the nest, species, and surrounding land uses. If no sign of nesting activity is observed, construction may proceed without potential impacts to nesting birds.

If an active nest is observed during the pre-construction clearance survey, an adequate buffer determined by the City-approved qualified biologist shall be established around the active nest depending on sensitivity of the species and proximity to construction activity and impact areas. Onsite construction monitoring may also be required to ensure that no direct or indirect impacts occur to the active nest or nesting activities.

Construction activities shall be avoided within the buffer, unless otherwise approved by the City-approved monitoring biologist (e.g., vehicles could pass through buffer areas while jackhammering would be restricted). Buffers shall be clearly marked and defined to restrict certain activities where they could result in nest failure, and shall remain in place until nests are no longer active, as determined by the City-approved monitoring biologist. 1297
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 5-1 ESA / 202000387.01 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
CHAPTER 5
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measures Timing
Responsible for
Implementation
Responsible for
Enforcement
Date of
Compliance
AES-1: The proposed light emitting diode (LED) billboard shall include an operating mechanism (hardware or software
controlled) that turns off the display or turns it to all black in the event of a malfunction or failure in any system or subsystem that results in the display wholly or partly appearing to flash..

Prior to
construction
completion
Project Construction
Contractor
Community
Development
Department
AES-2: Within 14 days of the proposed electronic billboard being operational, annually, and as required by City staff (i.e., after maintenance, malfunctions, multiple complaints), the Applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director the following information:
 A third party test conducted after installation to verify that the electronic billboard complies with the
requirements not to exceed 0.3 foot-candle above
ambient light at 250 feet from the face of the electronic billboard or exceed the 0.5 foot-candle at any
residential uses or 0.2 fc at natural areas.

Ongoing Applicant Community
Development
Department
BIO-1: Construction activities involving vegetation removal as well as installation of the proposed billboard shall be conducted between September 16 and December 31, outside the nesting season for birds in the region. If vegetation removal or installation must occur during the nesting season (January 1 – September 15), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for active nests within areas that will be subject to vegetation removal, construction noise, and/or ground disturbances, including a 500-foot buffer around existing trees and landscaped areas, to identify any potential active nests within seven days prior to work activities. Buffer distances can Survey prior to
construction and
monitoring during
construction
Applicant, Project
Construction
Contractor, and Project
Biologist
Community
Development
Department
1298

5. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 5-2 ESA / 202000387.01 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Mitigation Measures Timing
Responsible for
Implementation
Responsible for
Enforcement
Date of
Compliance
be adjusted at the discretion of the biologist based on the location of the nest, species, and surrounding land uses. If no sign of nesting activity is observed, construction may proceed without potential impacts to nesting birds.

If an active nest is observed during the pre-construction clearance survey, an adequate buffer determined by the Cityapproved qualified biologist shall be established around the active nest depending on sensitivity of the species and proximity to construction activity and impact areas. Onsite construction monitoring may also be required to ensure that no direct or indirect impacts occur to the active nest or nesting activities.

Construction activities shall be avoided within the buffer, unless otherwise approved by the City-approved monitoring biologist (e.g., vehicles could pass through buffer areas while
jackhammering would be restricted). Buffers shall be clearly marked and defined to restrict certain activities where they could result in nest failure, and shall remain in place until nests are no longer active, as determined by the City-approved monitoring biologist.

CUL-1: Prior to ground disturbance, the applicant is required to retain a City-approved archaeologist and Native American Monitor. In the event that historic or archaeological resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, these activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until a qualified archaeologist has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside the buffer area. All historic and archaeological resources unearthed by construction activities associated with the proposed Program shall be evaluated by a qualified
professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be historic, Native American Tribes/Individuals shall be contacted and consulted and Native American construction monitoring shall be initiated.

The Applicant and the City shall coordinate with the
archaeologist to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of
Retain
Archaeologist
and Native
American
Monitor prior to
ground
disturbance and
halt or divert
activities if
resources are
found until they
are evaluated
Applicant, Project
Archaeologist, and
Native American
Monitor
Community
Development
Department
1299

RIVERPARK BOULEVARD ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

Prepared for June 2022
City of Oxnard
Community Development Department
1300
1301

RIVERPARK BOULEVARD ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Prepared for June 2022
City of Oxnard
Community Development Department
214 South C Street
Oxnard, California 93030
805.385.8272
16755 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92606
949.753.7001
www.esassoc.com
Irvine
Los Ángeles
Oakland
Orlando
Pasadena
Petaluma
Portland
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
Santa Monica
Seattle
Tampa
Woodland Hills
202000387.01
r ESA
~
1302

OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. 1303
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard i ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Page
Initial Study.................................................................................................................. 1

1.0 Project Information........................................................................................ 1

2.0 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected...................................................... 9

3.0 Environmental Checklist.............................................................................. 11

3.1 Aesthetics and Urban Design............................................................. 11

3.2 Agricultural Resources....................................................................... 17

3.3 Air Quality ........................................................................................ 18

3.4 Biological Resources......................................................................... 26

3.5 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................ 29

3.6 Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources ............................... 38

3.7 Geology and Soils............................................................................. 42

3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials...................................................... 45

3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality.............................................................. 47

3.10 Land Use and Planning...................................................................... 50

3.11 Mineral Resources ............................................................................ 52

3.12 Noise............................................................................................... 53

3.13 Population, Education, and Housing ................................................... 58

3.14 Public Services and Recreation.......................................................... 60

3.15 Transportation and Circulation............................................................ 62

3.16 Utilities and Energy ........................................................................... 64

3.17 Wildfire............................................................................................. 69

3.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance..................................................... 70 Appendices
A Project Plans
B Proposed RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment Text Revisions C Native American Assembly Bill 52 Notification
D Photometric Analysis
E Air Quality Assumptions and Modeling
F Greenhouse Gas Assumptions and Modeling
G Energy Assumptions and Modeling
1304
Table of Contents
Page
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard ii ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
List of Figures
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map................................................................................. 4 Figure 2 Project Site Location Map ........................................................................ 5 Figure 3 Project Site Plan...................................................................................... 6 Figure 4 Electronic Billboard Elevation and Plan Views............................................ 7 Figure 5 Landscape Plan ...................................................................................... 8 List of Tables
Table AQ-1 Construction Schedule and Equipment.................................................... 21 Table AQ-2 Maximum Daily Total Construction Emissions.......................................... 22 Table GHG-1 GHG Emissions from Project Construction............................................... 32 Table GHG-2 GHG Emissions from Project Operations................................................. 33 Table GHG-3 Project Compliance with Applicable 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Actions and Strategies.................................................................... 34 Table N-1 Construction Noise Level ....................................................................... 54 Table UE-1 Summary of Fuel Consumption During Installation of the Proposed Electronic Billboard................................................................................ 65 1305

CITY OF OXNARD

CHECKLIST

CEQA INITIAL
STUDY
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 1 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Initial Study

1.0 Project Information

1. Project Title: Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard

2. City of Oxnard Contact Person and
Phone Number and Address: City of Oxnard
Community Development Department
Planning Division
214 South C Street
Oxnard, California 93030
Joe Pearson, II, Senior Planner
805-385-8272

3. Project Location: The Project is located on a 0.25-acre site in the northern portion of the City of Oxnard
(Figure 1). Specifically, the site is located
between the U.S. 101 and Riverpark Boulevard
approximately 850 feet north of Vineyard
Avenue, approximately 65 feet south of
Riverpark Boulevard, and approximately 1-foot
and 4 inches from the U.S. 101 right-of-way
(Figure 2). The Project site is currently
undeveloped.

4. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: Foster Interstate Media, Inc. 1111 Broadway, Suite 1515
Oakland, CA 94607
T: 510-832-7070 x 1103
F: 510-832-7071
C: 415.385.1781

5. General Plan Designation(s): The Project site is designated under the City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan as Regional
Commercial, according to the General Plan
Land Use Map. The proposed Project conforms
to the 2030 General Plan land use designation.

C ITY OF
OXNARD
1306
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 2 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

6. City Zoning: The zoning designation of the proposed Project is RiverPark Specific Plan with a Public
Facilities Land Use.

7. Description of Project:

The Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard is located between U.S. 101 and Riverpark Boulevard approximately 850 feet north of Vineyard Avenue. The Project site is located within the RiverPark Specific Plan “A” and was assessed as Public Facilities as part of the 2009 Addendum 8 to the RiverPark Specific Plan Final EIR. The implementation of the proposed Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard would require the approval of a Special Use Permit, Amendment to the RiverPark Specific Plan, and a Development Agreement. The Project plans are provided in Appendix A.

Special Use Permit
The proposed Project includes a request for approval of a Special Use Permit for the installation and operation of an electronic billboard (Figure 3). The electronic billboard would include a digital display of advertisements of various businesses, activities, services or products. The proposed billboard would be supported by a pole that ranges in diameter from approximately 7 feet to 3 feet.

The pole would extend approximately 40 feet below ground and approximately 45.5 feet above ground. The portion of the pole above ground would be painted primarily gray except for the upper

10.5 feet that would be painted black. The top of the billboard would be 60 feet in height above the ground and the dimensions of the electronic billboard sign would be 14.5 feet in height and 48.5 feet in width (Figure 4). The existing ground level is at approximately the same elevation as the travel lanes along U.S. 101 and Riverpark Boulevard. The electronic billboard would have a twosided light-emitting diode (LED) digital display that would have dimensions of 14 feet in height and 48 feet in width.

Electricity for the electronic billboard will be provided by electrical service located immediately adjacent to the Project site and require approximately 40 feet of trenching for the electrical connection. The average electricity use is approximately 150 kilowatt hour (kwh) per day and approximately 54,000 kwh per year. Lighting levels on the digital sign will not exceed 0.3 foot candles above ambient light from a distance of 250 feet, as measured according to standards of the Outdoor Advertising Association of America. Brightness shall not exceed 300 nitere (nits) or candela per square meter from sunset to sunrise. At all other times, brightness will not exceed 7,500 nits. Illumination shall be directed such that minimal light spill will occur on either side or the top or bottom of the sign face. A light sensor will be installed with the sign to measure ambient light levels and adjust light intensity and brightness based on ambient conditions. The electronic sign will not display any moving, flashing, scrolling, fading, brightening or animated text or video. The signage will be controlled remotely and include remote maintenance software. LED lighting has a directional nature, and the projected viewing angle values for the proposed sign will be +14.9°/-

34.6° vertically and ±45° horizontally. Louvers will be located above each row of lights to prevent light from projecting upward into the sky.

Construction activities would occur in approximately four days over a two-week period. Eight existing eucalyptus located on the north side of U.S. 101 are proposed to be removed which would require Caltrans approval because the trees are located within the U.S. 101 right-of-way. In addition, the Project includes removal of all dead wood located in the vicinity of the existing eucalyptus trees. The Project includes the placement of small multi-trunk accent trees with a maximum height of 15 feet along with low groundcover and shrubs (Figure 5). Up to two days will be required to drill the footing and haul/dispose of excess dirt and pour concrete to set the column.

After the concrete sets, the structure is built. Finally, the digital displays are built and set. 1307
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 3 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
Specific Plan Amendment
The proposed Project will require an amendment to the RiverPark Specific Plan. The amendment would include the addition of Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards within the Commercial Master Plan of the RiverPark Specific Plan. The specific revisions to the Specific Plan text is provided in Appendix B. The proposed revisions identify minimum and maximum lot dimensions as well as size and spacing of the billboards. These revisions would be consistent with the proposed Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance that is required to be approved prior to approval of the proposed Project.

Development Agreement
The proposed Development Agreement will allow for the use of City property for the purpose of a Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboard. The agreement would also outline the required public benefits to be provided by the future development, including fiscal benefits to the City, such as revenue sharing. No other physical improvements are allowed or required by the development agreement.

8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
The area surrounding the Project site consists of a mix of residential and commercial land uses. To the west and south of the Project site, across U.S. 101, is the Esplanade Commercial Shopping Center. To the southeast are retail commercial uses adjacent to Vineyard Avenue. These commercial and retail land uses are zoned as RiverPark Specific Plan. On the northeast side of Riverpark Boulevard is a place of worship and single family residences that are part of the El Rio West neighborhood and zoned as a Multiple-Family Residential Planned Development and SingleFamily Residential Planned Development. To the north are the two and three story Paseo Del Rio Apartments, which are also a part of the RiverPark Specific Plan Area. Further to northeast within the RiverPark Specific Plan area are additional apartments that are three stories and beyond the apartments is the Collection shopping center.

9. Other public agencies whose approval is required
The proposed Project will require two separate permits from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Because the Project includes the removal of existing landscaping and the installation of new landscaping within the right-of-way of U.S. 101, an encroachment permit from Caltrans will be required. In addition, the proposed Project will require an Outdoor Advertising Act Permit from Caltrans to ensure the proposed electronic sign does not represent a danger to motorists traveling along U.S. 101. No additional permits, financing approval or participation agreement will be required from other public agencies.

10. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?
The City of Oxnard sent a notification letter on November 23, 2021 to the Native American tribe that is on the City’s Assembly Bill (AB) 52 list (Appendix C). This list includes only one tribe, Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians, that has requested notification of projects within the City in accordance with AB 52. The Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians did not request consultation with the City of Oxnard regarding the proposed Project. 1308
Path: \\azr-file01\GIS_SHARE\GIS\GIS\Projects\2020xxx\D202000387.01_Riverpark_Blvd_Billboard\03_MXDs_Projects\Initial_Study\Fig1_Proj_Vic_Map.mxd, dkaneshiro 1/14/2022 SOURCE: OpenStreetMap, 2022
N
0 2
Miles
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard Project
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map

PROJECT SITE
r ESA
~ 1309

PROJECT SITE
Path: \\azr-file01\GIS_SHARE\GIS\GIS\Projects\2020xxx\D202000387.01_Riverpark_Blvd_Billboard\03_MXDs_Projects\Initial_Study\Fig2_Project Site Location Map.mxd, dkaneshiro 1/14/2022 SOURCE: OpenStreetMap, 2022 N 0 800
Feet Project Boundary
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard Project
Figure 2
Project Site Location Map
r ESA
~ 1310
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard Project
Figure 3
Project Site Plan
SOURCE: ib+a architecture, 2020
D202000387.02 - Ventura Road Billboard\05 Graphics-GIS-Modeling-USE AZURE N
Project Boundary
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Detail B
DetailC
1/4" = 1'-0"
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Bird's Eye Site Plan
0 r ESA
APN 132-0-311-075
Detail A
1/4" = 1'-0"
\
APN 132-0-311-075
\

TO BE RE-LANDSCAPED
\
\
\
\
\
\
Site Plan @Grade

NO ACCESS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
/
1311
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Project
Figure 4
Electronic Billboard Elevation and Plan Views
SOURCE: ib+a architecture, 2020
D202000387.02 - Ventura Road Billboard\05 Graphics-GIS-Modeling-USE AZURE r ESA
Face Elevation
~ IN
=========~
20'-4" L
Logo Cabinet Plan
48'-6"
- STEEL LADDER

ALUMINUM GRATING
~---- CATWALK
Logo Cabinet Elevation

ECONDARY FRAMING

FOR LED SIGN

PRIMARY STEEL TRUSS
STRUCTURE-PNT. BLACK
AL V. STEEL LADDER
_J _J
w
1)
6 b
co
..,

STRUCTURAL FRAMIN
-SSD. PAINT BLACK
Plan View

STEEL LADDER

STEEL LADDER
- - 1, - - - - - 1, - - - - - ,1- - 7 1- - - - - 7 1-
11 II II II II II
· i~~r;il~;~~l;;~,~~[; ;:,ill~;~-~,;[~

INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED

LOGO CABINET
'---- 10" DIA.
'---- 36" DIA.
-+----- 48" DIA.
----~ -STRUCTURAL STEEL TUBES
DIA.

Overall Elevation
NOTE: ALL STRUCTURAL NOTES TO BE VERIFIED BY

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
#4 TIES AT 10" O.C.

ALTERNATE #4 SPIRAL
1312
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard Project
Figure 5
Landscape Plan
SOURCE: Panoramic Design Group, 2021
D202000387.01 - Riverpark Boulevard Billboard\05 Graphics-GIS-Modeling-USE AZURE CRAPE MYRTLE: MANY SMALL VARIETIES ARE AVAILABLE
WESTERN REDBUD: CALIFORNIA NATIVE
VITEX: FRAGRANT LAVEN DAR FLOWERS ATTRACT BUTTERFLIES
r ESA
'\
00X· REMOVEALLEXISTING
··.. EUCALYPTUS
f %-.
" "'1-
SMALLMULTI-TRUNKACCENT <~
TREE, MAX 15FTHEIGHT:

KEEP EXISTING SHRUBS: ~ ,., ....•
CLEAN UP, REMOVE ALL . . . .

DEADWOOD.
• CRAPE MYRTLE

WESTERN REDBUD (CA NATIVE)
ITEX
>-·~o~ ~ x )( \ 0%,'·\
. , 'l;
< 1'
"' " •
0 \ " 00~~
LOWGROUNOCOVERTO FILL IN ~
BARE AREAS AMONG EXISTING '\ --f\
I
y
SHRUBS: 0
•NATIV~MEAL~~~:~=::; t ' •l &
• STICKY MONKEY FLOWER \
~/

LANDSCAPE DESIGN INTENT

THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN IS SIMPLE, NATURALISTIC, WATER CONSERVING AND LOW MAINTENANCE. IT IS IN CONTEXT WITH THE ADJACENT HIGHWAY, THE NEIGHBORING URBAN AREA ANO WITH THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT.

SMALL FLOWERING TREES DRIFT ALONG THE INSIDE EDGE, ADDING COLOR ANO SOFTENING THE STRUCTURE. THE UNDERSTORY RETAIN$ THE EXISTING LOW EVERGREEN SHRUBS AND FILL$ IN THE BARE AREAS WITH A NATIVE MEADOW WHICH IS COMPOSED OF TOUGH LOW GROUNOCOVERS. ADDITIONAL WOODY SHRUBS ARE AVOIDED DUE TO THE POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARD OF THEIR FLAMMABLE INTERIORS.

THE DESIGN COMPLIES WITH THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE. IT INCORPORATES SUSTAINABLE PRINCIPLES AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. SPECIES

ARE CAREFULLY SELECTED ANO COMBINED BASED ON SIMILAR WATER NEEDS ANO HORTICULTURAL REQUIREMENTS. PLANTING AND IRRIGATION ARE COORDINATED SO THAT WATER use IS MINIMIZED AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS ARE MAXIMIZED.

THIS LANDSCAPE PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL FURTHER DESIGN IS REQUIRED TO DEVELOP ITTO CONSTRUCTION READY PLANS. STICKY MONKEY FLOWER: NATIVE NATIVE MEADOW 0 ',.;,."--'-.··---32' If\
1/16"=1'--0" w
1313
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 9 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

2.0 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” or “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ☐ Aesthetics and
Urban Design ☒ Cultural Resources and
Tribal Cultural
Resources
☐ Mineral
Resources
☐ Utilities and
Energy
☐ Agricultural
Resources ☐ Geology and Soils ☒ Noise ☐ Wildfire
☐ Air Quality ☐ Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
☐ Population,
Education, and
Housing
☒ Mandatory
Findings of
Significance
☒ Biological
Resources
☐ Hydrology and
Water Quality ☐ Public Services
and Recreation
☐ Climate Change
and Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
☐ Land Use and
Planning ☐ Transportation
and Circulation
DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this initial study:
☐ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
☒ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
☐ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
☐ I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 1314
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 10 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
☐ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date

Printed Name For

1315
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 11 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.0 Environmental Checklist

3.1 Aesthetics and Urban Design
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect
on a scenic vista such as an ocean or mountain view
from an important view corridor or location as
identified in the 2030 General Plan or other City
planning documents?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway, or route identified as scenic by the
County of Ventura or City of Oxnard?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site or its
surroundings such as by creating new development
or other physical changes that are visually
incompatible with surrounding areas or that conflict
with visual resource policies contained in the 2030
General Plan or other City planning documents?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Would the project add to or compound an existing
negative visual character associated with the project
site?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
e) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or
nighttime views in the area?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Discussion
a) Less than SignificantImpact. Based on a review of the Oxnard General Plan Background Report (City of Oxnard, 2006), there are scenic areas and view corridors within the City of Oxnard. The scenic areas and view corridors include local waterways, agricultural open space, beaches and coastline, scenic highways/roadways, and urban landscapes that maintain original historic architectural features and contain park/plaza features.

The proposed Project is located adjacent to U.S. 101 that is identified as part of the City’s Scenic Highway System along the entire length of U.S. 101 from the eastern city limits to the western city limits. The current views from U.S. 101 in the vicinity of the Project site include urban development such as commercial and residential uses. The view from motorists traveling northbound on U.S. 101 from Vineyard Avenue includes eucalyptus trees on both sides of the freeway, urban development on both sides of the freeway and a background view of the Coastal Mountain Range. The view from motorists traveling southbound on U.S. 101 from Oxnard Boulevard includes urban development (commercial and residential uses) on both sides of the freeway with landscaping providing partial obstruction of structures in some areas. This view also includes Caltrans signs and private commercial billboards associated with the RiverPark Specific Plan development.

Background views from the southbound lanes include a small portion of the hills of Point Mugu State Park that bound the southeastern portion of the City of Oxnard. 1316
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 12 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
The implementation of the proposed amendment to the RiverPark Specific Plan, Development Agreement and placement of the proposed electronic billboard on the Project site would result in the removal of six existing eucalyptus trees located on the north side of the U.S. 101 right-of-way, and the placement of a 60-foot high pole with an electronic billboard that would be 14.5 feet in height and 48.5 feet in width. No landscaping is proposed on the Project site. A visual simulation of the proposed electronic billboard is provided in the Project Plans located in Appendix A. The implementation of the Project would result in an impact on motorist views traveling along U.S. 101; however, this impact would not be considered a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista since the views of the Project area from U.S. 101 consist of urban development and the views of the proposed electronic billboard would add another typical view of an urban landscape (i.e., billboards and Caltrans signs) that occurs along U.S. 101. Northbound motorists’ background views would be minimally impacted because existing views include partial distant views of the Coastal Mountain Range. Southbound motorists’ background view will also be minimally impacted because existing views include partial distant views of the hills of Point Mugu State Park. Therefore, implementation of the proposed electronic billboard along with the removal of the existing eucalyptustrees adjacent to the Projectsite would result in less than significant effects on a scenic vista.
b) Less than SignificantImpact. The Project site is located along the north side of U.S. 101.

Currently, U.S. 101 is an eligible State scenic highway; however, it is not an official Statedesignated scenic highway (Caltrans, 2019). The nearest officially State-designated highway is State Route 33 located approximately 8 miles west of the Project site. Oxnard Boulevard is also an eligible State scenic highway as well as a City-designated scenic highway to U.S. 101. However, Oxnard Boulevard is approximately 0.3 to 0.5 mile west of the Project site and due to existing terrain as well as existing development, very limited views of the upper elevations of the proposed electronic billboard would be viewable.

These limited views would not substantially alter the characteristics of existing viewsfrom Oxnard Boulevard.

As described above, U.S. 101 is identified as a City of Oxnard scenic highway. As discussed, potential visual impacts from the implementation of the proposed electronic billboard would result in less than significant visual impacts in the existing urban area.

Based on a review of the Oxnard General Plan Background Report (City of Oxnard, 2006), there are no historic resources in the vicinity of the Project site. In addition, based on a site visit, there are no areas of rock outcroppings. The Project will remove six eucalyptus trees located along the north side of U.S. 101; however, these trees would be replaced with trees that will mature with lower heights (i.e., 15 feet). The Project also includes the planting of shrubs along U.S. 101 adjacent to the Project site. Less than significant visual impacts would occur with the removal of the existing vegetation within the U.S. 101 right-of-way. c) Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the Project would add a structure to motorists’ view along the U.S. 101. The addition of the proposed electronic billboard would alter the existing visual characteristics along U.S. 101; however, because the area contains urban development and the proposed electronic billboard provides a typical view 1317
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 13 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
of an urban landscape (i.e., billboards and Caltrans signs) that occurs along U.S. 101, the visual alteration caused by the Project would not be considered a substantial change.

Therefore, potential impacts from the visual alteration of adding the proposed electronic billboard to the visual landscape would be less than significant.

The City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan includes aesthetic policies to protect and enhance natural setting and scenic resources. A discussion of the Project’s consistency with the applicable aesthetic policies is provided below.

Policy ER-6.1 includes the incorporation of views in new development. This policy requires development to provide physical breaks to allow views into scenic vistas and view corridors. Because the proposed Project includes a free-standing electronic billboard, the implementation of the Project would not conflict with this policy because motorists would briefly view the proposed billboard as they travel along U.S. 101. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with this policy.

Policy ER-6.2 includes the protection and enhancement of major scenic resources including the surrounding mountains. As discussed above, motorists traveling northbound along U.S. 101 would have a background view of the Coastal Mountain Range; however, this background view would be bordered by foreground urban development. Therefore, the addition of the proposed electronic billboard would not substantially impact these background views of the mountain and thus would not conflict with this policy. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with this policy.

Policy ER-6.5 includes the control of light and glare. The policy requires advertising displays and billboards to use low-energy, shielded light fixtures which direct light downward and, where public safety would not be compromised, encourage the use of lowpressure sodium lighting for all outdoor fixtures. The proposed electronic billboard would utilize energy efficient light emitting diode (LED) technology, which is recognized by the U.S. Department of Energy as the most energy efficient lighting technology. The lighting of the proposed electronic billboard would be designed to allow the message on the display visible to passing motorists. The digital LED billboard technology allows sign brightness to be adjusted automatically depending on ambient weather conditions. The display, for example, would be brighter in the daytime than at night-time and responds to changes in the ambient light conditions. The proposed electronic billboard would require a California Department of Transportation Outdoor Advertising Act Permit from Caltrans. The proposed billboard would comply with the brightness requirements outlined in the Outdoor Advertising Act in that the illumination shall not be of such brilliance or so positioned as to cause a hazardous condition on adjacent highways. The implementation of the proposed electronic billboard would not conflict with this policy. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with this policy.

Based on a review of the existing City of Oxnard sign regulations within the City of Oxnard Municipal Code, the proposed electronic billboard is not currently an allowed use within the City of Oxnard. However, as discussed above, the implementation of the proposed 1318
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 14 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
electronic billboard would result in less than significant impact to scenic vistas, scenic resources, and scenic highways, and the Project would result in a less than significant visual alteration of the existing visual characteristics as well as less than significant light and glare.
d) Less than Significant Impact. Currently, the Project site includes non-native grasses and disturbed areas as well as landscaping located along U.S. 101. The Project site is undeveloped and does not represent an existing negative view from the surrounding areas.

The addition of the proposed electronic billboard would alter the existing visual characteristics of the Project area; however, as discussed above, this alteration would be considered less than significant. Therefore, the addition of the proposed electronic billboard would not add to or compound to an existing negative view of the Project site, and as a result the Project’s impact would be less than significant. e) Less than Significant Impact. The operation of the proposed Project would increase nighttime lighting in the Project vicinity. Currently, the City of Oxnard does not have a quantitative exterior light standard. Typically, lighting is quantified using foot-candle (fc) which is the unit of measure expressing the quantity of light received on a surface. One foot-candle is the illuminance produced by a candle on a surface one-foot square from a distance of one foot.

Light pollution or obtrusive light is highly subjective. To address concerns with light pollution, recommendations to limit light trespass onto adjacent properties from the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) were reviewed. The CIE identifies a light trespass illuminance of 0.5 fc or greater for urban areas such as the Project site (CIE, 2003).

Therefore, due to the absence of a current local light pollution standard, a significant light impact on the adjacent residents would occur if light levels are 0.5 fc or greater.

The lighting associated with the proposed electronic billboard was evaluated within a Photometric Analysis provided in Appendix D. Lighting from the billboard would be directed toward the travel lanes along U.S. 101. Louvers will be located above each row of lights to prevent light from projecting upward into the sky. As discussed above, the digital LED billboard technology allows sign brightness to be adjusted automatically depending on ambient weather conditions. The display, for example, would be brighter in the daytime than at night-time and responds to changes in the ambient light conditions.

The nearest residencesto the Project site are located approximately150 feet to the north and northeast. Based on the Photometric Analysis provided in Appendix D, the light levels at the residential areas north and northeast of the site and east of Riverpark Boulevard would be less than 0.2 fc. Because the light level would be less than 0.5 fc, the Project would result in a less than significant lighting impact on the adjacent residential uses.

To ensure that the images on the electronic billboard do not cause hazardous conditions to motorists, the billboard may show a series of still images, each displayed for at least eight seconds. The still images may not move or present the appearance of motion and may not use flashing or blinking lights or any other means not providing constant 1319
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 15 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
illumination. Transition or blank screen time between one still image and the next may not exceed one second. The implementation of these design features as well as complying with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, including the Highway Beautification Act of 1965 (23 United States Code Section 131) and the Outdoor Advertising Act (California Business and Professions Code Section 5200 et seq.), when constructing, operating, improving, maintaining, and repairing the proposed billboard would reduce potential light and glare impacts from the proposed electronic billboard to less than significant.

Lighting from the proposed billboard would be primarily directed towards the travel lanes along U.S. 101. The proposed billboard will be angled as shown in Figure 4 so that lighting onto adjacent land uses (i.e., the residences north and northeast of the site) would be minimized. Based on the photometric analysis provided in Appendix D, lighting levels at the adjacent residences would be minimized and would be less than 0.5 fc. Therefore, the operation of the proposed electronic billboard would not result in a substantial light increase and would result in a less than significant impact on daytime or nighttime views.

Although less than significant lighting impacts would occur, the following mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce less than significant light impacts.

Mitigation Measure AES-1: The proposed light emitting diode (LED) billboard shall include an operating mechanism (hardware or software controlled) that turns off the display or turns it to all black in the event of a malfunction or failure in any system or subsystem that results in the display wholly or partly appearing to flash.

Mitigation Measure AES-2: Within 14 days of the proposed electronic billboard being operational, annually, and as required by City staff (i.e., after maintenance, malfunctions, multiple complaints), the Applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director thereafter as, of the freeway sign being operational, annually, and as required by City staff (after maintenance, malfunctions, multiple complaints) the applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director the following information:
• A third party test conducted after installation to verify that the electronic billboard complies with the requirements not to exceed 0.3 foot-candle above ambient light at 250 feet from the face of the electronic billboard or exceed 0.5 foot-candle at any residential uses.

As identified above, the implementation of the above mitigation measures would further reduce a less than significant impact.

References
Caltrans. 2019. California State Scenic Highways. Available at:
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-communitylivability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways. Accessed on February 10, 2022. 1320
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 16 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
City of Oxnard. City of Oxnard General Plan Background Report. Available at:
https://www.oxnard.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/08/OxnardDraftBackgroundReport2006_04.21.06.pdf. Accessed on February 10, 2022.
exp. 2020. Photometric Analysis. October 23. Appendix D of this IS/MND.

International Commission on Illumination (CIE). 2003. Guide on the Illumination of the Effects of Obtrusive Light from Outdoor Lighting Installations. 1321
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 17 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.2 Agricultural Resources
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to
non-agricultural use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Would the project involve other changes in the
existing environment that, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of off-site farmland to non-agricultural use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) No Impact. The Project site is currently identified as Urban and Built-Up Land and not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland, or Statewide Importance based on a review of the California Department of Conservation’s California Important Farmland Finder (CDC, 2016). Therefore, the implementation of the proposed Project would not convert farmland to an urban use, and no impact to farmland would occur. b) No Impact. Williamson Act contracts are formed between a county or city and a landowner for the purposes of restricting specific parcels of land to agricultural preserve areas. The Project site does not contain any agricultural uses. It is currently zoned for Specific Plan with a Public Facilities land use. Because there are no active Williamson Act contracts associated with the Project site, the Project would not conflict with existing agricultural zoning or a Williamson Act contract. No Project impact would occur. c) No Impact. Because there are no agricultural or forest lands located in the immediate vicinity of the Project site, the construction and operation of the proposed electronic billboard would not involve other changes in the existing environment that would result in the conversion of agricultural or forest lands. No impacts would occur.

References
California Department of Conservation (CDC), 2016. Available at: California Important Farmland Finder https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. Accessed on February 10, 2022.
1322
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 18 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.3 Air Quality
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the Ventura County AQMP?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant in
excess of quantitative thresholds recommended by
the VCAPCD?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations exceeding state
or federal standards or in excess of applicable health
risk criteria for toxic air contaminants?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Would the project create objectionable odors
affecting a substantial number of people?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Discussion
a) Less than Significant Impact. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) is responsible for attaining and maintaining air quality standards in the Ventura County portion of the South Central Coast Air Basin (SCCAB) through a comprehensive program of planning, regulation, enforcement, technical innovation, and promotion of the understanding of air quality issues. The clean air strategy of VCAPCD includes preparation of plans for attainment of ambient air quality standards, adoption and enforcement of rules and regulations concerning sources of air pollution, and issuance of permits for stationary sources of air pollution. The Ventura County portion of the SCCAB is designated as nonattainment for ozone for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and for respirable particulate matter 10 micrometers in diameter and smaller (PM10) for the CAAQS. VCAPCD and the Ventura Council Association of Governments (VCOG) are responsible for preparing the air quality management plan (AQMP), which addresses federal and state Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements. The VCAPCD has adopted Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) to meet the CAAQS and NAAQS. The VCAPCD Governing Board adopted the 2016 AQMP on February 14, 2017. The goals of the VCAQMP are to ensure that city and county population growth do not interfere with emission reductions and progress in meeting the state and national ambient air quality standards.

The proposed Project is located within the Ventura County portion of the SCCAB, which is under the jurisdiction of the VCAPCD for air quality planning and control. As such, VCAPCD’s 2016 AQMP is the applicable air quality plan for the proposed Project.

Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by VCOG are deemed consistent with the AQMP growth projections, since the forecast assumptions by VCOG forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP. Additionally, because VCOG’s regional growth forecasts are based upon, among other things, land uses designated in general plans, a project that is consistent with the land use designated in a general plan would also be consistent with the VCOG’s regional forecast projections, and thus also with the AQMP growth projections. 1323
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 19 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
The billboard Project would generate temporary emissions that would occur during the construction associated with installation activities. These emissions would be short-term in nature (approximately 4 days of construction for the billboard installation) over a twoweek period. The billboard operations would not generate additional employment or population growth or transportation impacts from increased vehicle trips. Ongoing operation of the billboards would require power in the form of purchased electricity and would not generate any direct emissions of criteria pollutants or ozone precursors at the Project site, aside from minimal emissions from occasional site visits for maintenance or repairs.

The VCAPCD Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines exempts projects with de minimis emissions from Consistency Assessments. According to Section 4.2.1, Projects Exempt from Consistency Assessments, a project that conforms to the applicable General Plan designation and has emissions below two pounds per day of reactive organic compounds (ROC), and below two pounds per day of nitrogen oxides (NOX), is not required to assess consistency with the AQMP. According to Section 5.2, Calculating Ozone Precursor Emissions from Project Construction, the VCAPCD does not consider emissions from construction activities towards VCAPCD thresholds since construction emissions are temporary.

The Project would not generate air pollutant emissions during operations, and is thus not required to assess consistency with the AQMP. Further, as discussed above, the billboard operations would not generate additional employment or population growth or transportation impacts from increased vehicle trips. Therefore, the Project would have no impact with respect to conflicts with or obstruction of implementation of the applicable air quality plan.
b) Less than Significant Impact. The City of Oxnard has not developed specific air quality thresholds for air quality impacts. However, as stated in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the above determinations. As such, the significance thresholds and analysis methodologies in VCAPCD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook are used in evaluating Project impacts. The VCAPCD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook focuses on reducing ozone precursor emissions, which includes ROCs (also referred to as volatile organic compounds [VOCs]) and NOX because emissions of these pollutants could jeopardize attainment of the NAAQS and CAAQS for ozone in Ventura County. The other criteria pollutants of concern include: carbon monoxide (CO), which is a colorless and odorless gas and can cause dizziness, confusion, unconsciousness or even death at high levels; sulfur dioxide (SO2), which is also colorless and can cause asthma exacerbation, including bronchoconstriction accompanied by symptoms of respiratory irritation, such as wheezing, shortness of breath and chest tightness; and PM10 and fine particulate matter 2.5 micrometers or less in diameter (PM2.5), which can worsen respiratory diseases, including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, leading to hospitalization and emergency department visits and respiratory mortality. The 1324
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 20 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
VCAPCD has not established mass emission significance thresholds for CO, SO2, PM10 or PM2.5.

Construction
Construction emissions from projects are considered short term and temporary but could adversely affect air quality. Emissions of ozone precursors and particulate matter are potential concernsin theVentura County portion of the SCCAB since the area is designated as nonattainment for ozone (NAAQS and CAAQA) and PM10 (CAAQS). Emissions of ozone precursors ROC and NOX are primarily generated from heavy-duty equipment and motor vehicle exhaust and vary as a function of vehicle trips per day associated with soil hauling, delivery of construction materials, and worker commute trips, and the types and number of heavy-duty, off-road equipment used and the intensity and frequency of their operation. Particulate matter (i.e., PM10 and PM2.5) is among the pollutants of greatest localized concern with respect to construction activities given that particulate concentrations tend to be higher near the source of the emissions. Particulate emissions from construction activities can lead to adverse health effects and nuisance concerns, such as reduced visibility and soiling of exposed surfaces. Particulate emissions can result from a variety of construction activities, including drilling/excavation, vehicle travel on paved and unpaved surfaces, and vehicle and equipment exhaust. Construction emissions of PM can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the number and types of equipment operated, local soil conditions, weather conditions, and the amount of earth disturbance.

Proposed construction activities associated with billboard installations would generate temporary pollutant emissions from the following construction activities: (1) drilling and haul of excavated soil; (2) column set/concrete pour; (3) build and set of the billboard structure; and (4) build & set digital displays. These construction activities would create emissions of dust, fumes, equipment exhaust, and other air contaminants. The daily quantity of emissions generated would vary, depending on the intensity and types of construction activities occurring during each task.

Construction emissions from the proposed billboard Project is estimated to require four days of construction activity. For the purposes of the air quality analysis, the construction activities were modeled for the earliest potential time frame to provide for a conservative analysis. Construction of the Project is assumed to occur in 2022. If construction occurs subsequent to 2022, the emissions presented in this IS/MND would be conservative as emissions occurring in future years would be lower than those calculated for 2022 due to the use of a more energy-efficient and cleaner burning construction vehicle fleet mix, pursuant to State regulations that require vehicle fleet operators to phase-in less polluting heavy-duty equipment. Assumptions, including information on equipment horsepower, hours of operation, vehicle trip distances and the model output, are included in Appendix E. CalEEMod version 2020.4.0 was used with Ventura County defaults whenever appropriate to ensure a location specific, but generic emission model that would apply to a range of installation scenarios. Table AQ-1, Construction Schedule and 1325
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 21 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
Equipment, below summarizes the basic construction schedule, equipment and on-road vehicle types and trips.

TABLE AQ-1

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND EQUIPMENT
Days Equipment
Daily Haul / Equipment
Delivery Tripsa
Daily Worker
Tripsa
Drilling / Haul Soil 1 Excavator/Drill
Skid Steer Loader
Dump Trucks
12 8
Column Set / Concrete Pour 1 Crane
Truck mounted Aerial Lift
Concrete Pump
Concrete Mixers (trucks)
12 10
Build & Set Structure 1 Crane
Truck Mounted Aerial Lift
Air Compressor
8 10
Build & Set Digital Displays 1 Crane
Truck Mounted Aerial Lift
8 10
a Haul and construction worker trips are inbound and outbound trips, with one inbound and one outbound tripcomprising a roundtrip.

Haul and delivery trips are for the export of soil, import of cement and delivery of the billboard columns, display, and associated materials.

SOURCE: City of Oxnard, 2022
It is mandatory for all construction projects in the SCCAB to comply with VCAPCD Rule 55 for controlling fugitive dust. Incorporating Rule 55 into the proposed Project reduces regional PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from construction activities. Specific Rule 55 control requirements may include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible, covering all trucks hauling soil with a fabric cover and maintaining a freeboard height of 12 inches, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. Compliance with Rule 55 was accounted for in the construction emissions modeling.

Ventura County Guidance specifies that construction-related emissions are not counted towards the significance thresholds for the ozone precursors (ROC and NOX) since the emissions are temporary. However, they should be mitigated if they are predicted to exceed the threshold level (25 pounds per day of ROC or NOX in the Project area).

The VCAPCD has not established a quantitative threshold for fugitive dust emissions, but provides qualitative criteria in its Air Quality Assessment Guidelines.

A project that may be reasonably expected to generate fugitive dust emissions in such quantities as to cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which may endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such person or the public, or which may cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, 1326
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 22 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
injury or damage to business or property (see California Health and Safety Code, Division 26, §41700) will have a significant adverse air quality impact.

Table AQ-2, Maximum Daily Total Construction Emissions, summarizes the estimated emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors associated with a typical billboard installation for each individual construction phase (day) along with the maximum daily emissions. These emissions are compared to VCAPCD’s daily operational significance threshold for ROG and NOX emissions to determine if mitigation should be implemented.

As shown, the maximum daily emissions would be below the operational thresholds.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any significant construction emission impacts for these nonattainment pollutants, nor require any mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the Project design (e.g., fugitive dust control according to VCAPCD Rule 55, compliance with state truck regulations).

TABLE AQ-2

MAXIMUM DAILY TOTAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Maximum Regional Emissions (lbs/day)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Drilling / Haul Soil <1 5.5 6.1 <1 <1 <1
Column Set / Concrete Pour <1 8.1 5.6 <1 <1 <1
Build & Set Structure <1 7.9 6.0 <1 <1 <1
Build & Set Digital Displays <1 6.0 3.6 <1 4 4
Maximum Daily Emissions a <1 8.1 6.1 <1 <1 <1
Operational SignificanceThresholds /
Screening Levels 25 b 25 b — — — —
Significant Impact? No No NA NA NA NA
a Maximum daily emissions are for each individual pollutant thatresults in the greatest emissions on a peak day of construction.

Note: All emissions shown above include VCAPCD Rule 55 fugitive dust reduction measures. b VCAPCD operational significance thresholds.

SOURCE: ESA, 2022
Operation
Proposed operational activities associated with the operation of the proposed electronic billboard would not generate any direct emissions of criteria pollutant and ozone precursors. Furthermore, the operation of the billboard would not generate any employment or population growth and related emissions nor any additional daily vehicle trips or transportation related emissions of criteria pollutants or ozone precursors (minimal emissions from occasional site visits for maintenance or repairs may occur periodically).

The operation of the billboard would not result in emissions of ozone precursors in excess of the ROC and NOX operational significance thresholds, and impacts from these pollutants would be less than significant. Operation of the billboard would also not generate PM10 or PM2.5 emissions from fugitive dust are minimal and would not cause injury, nuisance 1327
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 23 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
or health impacts to a significant number of persons of the public. Therefore, impacts from fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) emissions would be less than significant.

Cumulative
The geographic scope for regional air quality impacts consists of the air basin(s) in which Project emissions would occur. The VCAPCD’s approach for assessing cumulative impacts is based on attainment of ambient air quality standards in accordance with the requirements of the CAA and California Clean Air Act. As discussed earlier, the VCAPCD has developed a comprehensive plan, the 2016 AQMP, which addresses the region’s cumulative air quality condition. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3) provides guidance in determining the significance of cumulative impacts, stating in part that:

A lead agency may determine that a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in a previously approved plan or mitigation program which provides specific requirements that will avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problem (e.g., water quality control plan, air quality plan, integrated waste management plan) within the geographic area in which the project is located. Such plans or programs must be specified in law or adopted by the public agency with jurisdiction over the affected resources through a public review process to implement, interpret, or make specific the law enforced or administered by the public agency.

For purposes of the cumulative air quality analysis with respect to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3), the proposed Project’s incremental contribution to cumulative air quality impacts is determined based on compliance with the VCAPCD’s adopted 2016 AQMP. With respect to the Project’s short-term construction-related air quality emissions and cumulative conditions, VCAPCD has developed strategies to reduce criteria pollutant emissions outlined in the AQMP pursuant to the federal CAA mandates. Construction of the Project would comply with VCAPCD Rule 55 fugitive dust control requirements and the ATCM to limit heavy duty diesel motor vehicle idling to no more than five minutes at any location. These measures would also be imposed on trucks used for construction in the State, which would include the cumulative projects in the Project area. Additionally, with respect to operational emissions, the Project’s emissions would be less than the significance thresholds, and the Project would not conflict with the AQMP. Since the Project’s construction and operational emissions would not exceed the VCAPCD’s regional significance thresholds, and the proposed Project would not conflict with the AQMP, cumulative construction and operational impacts would be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors are individuals who are considered more sensitive to air pollutantsthan others. The reasons for greater than average sensitivity may include pre-existing health problems, proximity to emissions sources, or duration of exposure to air pollutants. Schools, hospitals, and convalescent homes are considered as relatively sensitive to poor air quality because children, elderly people, and the infirm are more susceptible to respiratory distress and other air quality-related health problems than 1328
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 24 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
the general public. Residential areas are considered sensitive to poor air quality because people usually stay home for extended periods of time, with associated greater exposure to ambient air quality. Because the installation of the proposed billboard would occur approximately 150 feet from an existing residence, construction air emissions would disperse in the environment and decrease with distance from the source. The limited emissions from construction activities would not cause a significant impact to sensitive receptors as discussed below.

Carbon Monoxide Hotspots
Emissions of CO are generated in greatest quantities from motor vehicle combustion of fossil fuels and are usually concentrated at or near ground level because they do not readily disperse into the atmosphere, particularly under cool, stable (i.e., low or no wind) atmospheric conditions. Localized areas where ambient concentrations exceed State and/or federal standards are termed CO hotspots. Traffic impacts and the potential for CO hot spots from the operation of motor vehicles related construction of the proposed Project would be minimal as there are less than 20 additional one-way trips per day from construction related haul vehicles and construction worker automobiles combined. In fact, the VCAPCD requires a screening analysis to determine the potential for CO Hotspots for any project with indirect emissions greater than the applicable ozone (ROG and NOx) project significance levels as analyzed in Section 3.3 b) above where roadway intersections are currently operating at or are expected to operate at a Level of Service (LOS) of E or F.

As indicated in Table AQ-2 above, the proposed Project would be below significance thresholds for ROG and NOX, indicating the low potential for Project impacts.

Operation of the billboards would not result in any regular vehicular activity, though there may be the occasional site visit for maintenance or repairs. These would result in negligible emissions and result in a negligible impact on traffic, and impacts would be less than significant.

Localized Air Quality Impacts – TACs
Project construction would result in short-term emissions of diesel PM, a TAC. Diesel particulate matter poses a carcinogenic health risk that is measured using an exposure period of 70 years for a lifetime exposure or 30 years for a residential exposure. The exhaust of off-road heavy-duty diesel equipment would emit diesel particulate matter from off-road construction vehicles and from on-road cement trucks and haul trucks, delivery tractor trailers during the short construction phase for the proposed billboard. The dose to which receptors are exposed is the primary factor used to determine health risk (i.e., the potential exposure to TACs to be compared to applicable standards). Dose is a function of the concentration of a substance or substances in the environment and the duration of exposure to the substance. Dose is positively correlated with time, meaning that a longer exposure period would result in a higher exposure level for the maximally exposed individual. Thus, the risks estimated for a maximally exposed individual are higher if a fixed exposure occurs over a longer time period. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), carcinogenic health risk assessments, which 1329
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 25 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to TAC emissions, should be based on a 70- year exposure period for a lifetime exposure or 30 years for a residential exposure; however, such assessments should be limited to the period or duration of activities associated with the proposed Project.

The construction period for the proposed billboard installation is approximately four days in duration over approximately two weeks and would not represent a significant dose.

Additionally, the billboard would be located approximately 150 feet from the nearest residence. Given the short duration of the construction activities, and the distance of the sensitive receptors from the Project, the proposed Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and impacts would be less than significant.

Operation of the billboard would not result in any direct emissions, as it would utilize purchased electricity to power for lighting. Further, operation of the billboard would not generate daily vehicle trips or transportation related emissions of criteria pollutants or ozone precursors(minimal emissions from occasional site visits for maintenance or repairs may occur periodically). Therefore, implementation of the proposed electronic billboard would not result in emissions of TACs that would substantially impact sensitive receptors, and the impact would be less than significant.
d) Less than Significant Impact. During installation of billboard, diesel exhaust from diesel trucks and off-road construction equipment construction equipment may emit odors. Such odors would be a temporary source of nuisance to adjacent uses but would not affect a substantial number of people. As odors associated with Project construction would be temporary and intermittent in nature, the odors would not be considered as a significant environmental impact. Therefore, construction activities would result in less than significant impacts with respect to other emissions, including those leading to odors.

There are no direct emissions associated with the operation of the billboard, and operational impacts would not result in any odor impacts and, therefore, would be less than significant with respect to odors. The Project would not generate other emissions that would adversely affect a substantial number of people as discussed in Section 3.3 b) and c) above, and impacts would be less than significant.

References
City of Oxnard. 2022. Construction Assumptions for Electronic Billboard.

VCAPCD 2003. Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines. October. Available:
http://www.vcapcd.org/environmental-review.htm.

VCAPCD 2017. Final 2016 Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan. February 14.

Available: http://www.vcapcd.org/pubs/Planning/AQMP/2016/Final/Final-2016-VenturaCounty-AQMP.pdf 1330
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 26 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.4 Biological Resources
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special-status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect
on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations, or by the California Department
of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect
on federally protected waters of the U.S. as defined
by Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act or
protected waters of the state as defined by Section
1600 et seq. of the California Fish and Game Code
(including, but not limited to, marshes, vernal pools,
coastal wetlands) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Would the project interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Would the project conflict with an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in a highly urbanized area of the City of Oxnard predominantly developed with commercial and residential uses. The Project site has non-native herbaceous and grassland vegetation as the dominant habitat, and the Project site is surrounded by ornamental trees, including eucalyptus. A database review showed that the Project site is not overlain within U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)-designated Critical Habitat for any special-status plant or wildlife species (USFWS 2022a). Additionally, the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare Plant Inventory identified 25 special-status species being recorded within the Oxnard USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle (CDFW 2022; CNPS 2022). Of these 25 special-status species, none of the species have potential to occur within or surrounding the Project site as the parcel is disturbed and developed, lacks suitable habitat, is adjacent to Highway 101, and is sparsely vegetated. Therefore, implementation of the Project would result in a less than significant impact on sensitive habitat or sensitive species.
1331
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 27 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
b) No Impact. No riparian or other sensitive communities are known to occur within or surrounding the Projectsite. Although limited ornamental vegetation is present, the Project site consists of, and is surrounded by, developed and disturbed areas that lack natural vegetation. Therefore, the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. No impact would occur. c) No Impact. Wetlands (including swamps, bogs, seasonal wetlands, seeps, marshes, and similar areas) are considered waters of the U.S., and are defined by USACE as “those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions” (33 CFR 328.3[b]; 40 CFR 230.3[t]). No wetland features are identified by the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) as occurring within or surrounding the Project site (USFWS 2022b). Therefore, no impact to wetlands would occur as a result of the proposed Project. d) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As mentioned above in Sections

3.4 b) and 3.4 c), no surface water bodies, streams, or waterways occur within or surrounding the Project site making it unsuitable for migratory fish. Additionally, the Project site is highly disturbed and surrounded by commercial development making it unsuitable for wildlife to use as a migratory corridor or nursery site. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

While no special-status avian species are expected to nest within the Project site, all native bird species that occur within the Project site are protected from ‘take’ by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC). Limited suitable avian nesting habitat is present within or surrounding the Projectsite. However, many avian species are known to nest within ornamental shrubs and trees planted as part of existing landscaping and man-made structures and buildings. Therefore, the proposed Project may affect nesting birds as suitable habitat occurs for tree, shrub, and cavity-nesting birds within and surrounding the Project site. This potential effect is considered significant.

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Vegetation removal shall be conducted between September 1 and January 31, outside the typical nesting season for birds in the region. If vegetation removal must occur during the typical nesting season (February 1 – August 31), a City-approved qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for active nests within areas that will be subject to vegetation removal, construction noise, and/or ground disturbances, including a 100 to 300- foot buffer around existing trees and landscaped areas, to identify any potential active nests. Buffer distances can be adjusted at the discretion of the biologist based on the location of the nest, species, and surrounding land uses. If no sign of nesting activity is observed, construction may proceed without potential impacts to nesting birds.

If an active nest is observed during the pre-construction clearance survey, an adequate buffer determined by the City-approved qualified biologist shall be established around the active nest depending on sensitivity of the species and proximity to construction activity and impact areas. Onsite construction 1332
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 28 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
monitoring may also be required to ensure that no direct or indirect impacts occur to the active nest or nesting activities. Construction activities shall be avoided within the buffer, unless otherwise approved by the monitoring biologist (e.g., vehicles could pass through buffer areas while jackhammering would be restricted). Buffers shall be clearly marked and defined to restrict certain activities where they could result in nest failure, and shall remain in place until nests are no longer active, as determined by the City-approved monitoring biologist.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce potentially significant impacts to nesting birds during construction to less than significant. e) No Impact. The Project includes the removal of existing eucalyptus trees along U.S. 101 and the planting of drought tolerant tree species, including carpe myrtle, western redbud, and vitex. The removal of the existing eucalyptus trees within the U.S. 101 right-of-way will require approval of an encroachment permit from Caltrans. No trees or shrubs exist on the Project site and would not be removed as a result of implementing the proposed electronic billboard. Therefore, there are no applicable local (City of Oxnard) policies or ordinances protecting biological resources associated with the proposed Project. As a result, no impact would occur.
f) No Impact. The Project site does not occur within any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan areas. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with provisions of an adopted natural community conservation plan or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan, and no impact would occur.

References
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2022. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) RareFind 5. CDFW’s Electronic database, Sacramento, California.

Accessed on February 22, 2022, at https://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022a. IPAC Information for Planning and Consultation. Accessed on February 22, 2022, at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS). 2022b. National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Data Mapper. Accessed on February 22, 2022, at
https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html.
1333
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 29 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.5 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan,
policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases or
otherwise conflict with the state goal for reducing
greenhouse gas emissions in California?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Would the project contribute or be subject to potential secondary effects of climate change (e.g., sea level
rise, increase fire hazard)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Discussion
a, b) Less than Significant Impact. State regulated GHGs include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). CO2 is the most abundant GHG in the atmosphere. Not all GHGs exhibit the same ability to induce climate change; as a result, GHG contributions are commonly quantified in equivalent mass of CO2, denoted as CO2e. Mass emissions are calculated by converting pollutant specific emissions to CO2e emissions by applying the proper global warming potential (GWP) value. These GWP ratios are available from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and are published in the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) General Reporting Protocol. By applying the GWP ratios, Project related CO2e emissions can be tabulated in metric tons per year.

Neither the City nor the VCAPCD have adopted a numerical significance threshold for assessing impacts related to GHG emissions from a project, and the City has not formally adopted a local plan for reducing GHG emissions. When no guidance exists under CEQA, the lead agency may look to and assess general compliance with comparable regulatory schemes. 1 In its January 2008 CEQA and Climate Change white paper, the California Air Pollution Control Officer’s Association (CAPCOA) identified a number of potential approaches for determining the significance of GHG emissions in CEQA documents. In its white paper, CAPCOA suggests making significance determinations on a case-by-case basis when no significance thresholds have been formally adopted by a lead agency.

Amendments to Section 15064.4 of the CEQA Guidelines were adopted to assist lead agencies in determining the significance of the impacts of GHG emissions. Consistent with 1 See Protect Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency (2004) 116 Cal. App. 4th 1099, 1107 [“‘[A] lead agency’s use of existing environmental standards in determining the significance of a project’s environmental impacts is an effective means of promoting consistency in significance determinations and integrating CEQA environmental review activities with other environmental program planning and resolution.”’”].Lead agencies can, and often do, use regulatory agencies’ performance standards. A project’s compliance with these standards usually is presumed to provide an adequate level of protection for environmental resources. See, e.g., Cadiz Land Co. v.

Rail Cycle (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 74, 99 (upholding use of regulatory agency performance standard). 1334
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 30 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
existing CEQA practice, Section 15064.4 gives lead agencies the discretion to determine whether to assess those emissions quantitatively or qualitatively. If a qualitative analysis is used, in addition to quantification, this section recommends certain qualitative factors that may be used in the determination of significance (i.e., extent to which the project may increase or reduce GHG emissions compared to the existing environment; whether the project exceeds an applicable significance threshold; and extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a reduction or mitigation of GHGs). The amendments do not establish a threshold of significance; rather, lead agencies are granted discretion to establish significance thresholds for their respective jurisdictions, including looking to thresholds developed by other public agencies, or suggested by other experts, such as CAPCOA, so long as any threshold chosen is supported by substantial evidence (see Section 15064.7(c)). The California Natural Resources Agency has also clarified that the CEQA Guidelines amendments focus on the effects of GHG emissions as cumulative impacts, and that they should be analyzed in the context of CEQA’s requirements for cumulative impact analysis (see Section 15064(h)(3)).2 Although GHG emissions can be quantified, CARB, VCAPCD and the City of Oxnard have not adopted project-level significance thresholds for GHG emissions that would be applicable to the Project. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released a technical advisory on CEQA and climate change that provided some guidance on assessing the significance of GHG emissions, and states that “lead agencies may undertake a project-by-project analysis, consistent with available guidance and current CEQA practice,” and that while “climate change is ultimately a cumulative impact, not every individual project that emits GHGs must necessarily be found to contribute to a significant cumulative impact on the environment.”3 Furthermore, the technical advisory states that “CEQA authorizes reliance on previously approved plans and mitigation programs that have adequately analyzed and mitigated GHG emissions to a less than significant level as a means to avoid or substantially reduce the cumulative impact of a project.”4 Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3), a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative impact can be found not cumulatively considerable if the project would comply with an approved plan or mitigation program that provides specific requirements that will avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problem within the geographic area of the project. 5 To qualify, such a plan or program must be specified in law or adopted by the public agency with jurisdiction over the affected resources through a public review process 2 See generally California Natural Resources Agency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action (December 2009), pp. 11-13, 14, 16.
http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdfhttp://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/Final_Stateme nt_of_Reasons.pdf, accessed November 2019; see also Letter from Cynthia Bryant, Director of the Office of Planning and Research to Mike Chrisman, Secretary for Natural Resources, April 13, 2009. Available at http://www.valleyair.org/Programs/CCAP/documents/Transmittal_LetterOPRApril2009.pdfhttp://opr.ca.gov/docs/ Transmittal_Letter.pdf, accessed November 2019.
3 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory – CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review, (2008). 4 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory – CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review, (2008). 5 14 CCR § 15064(h)(3).
1335
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 31 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
to implement, interpret, or make specific the law enforced or administered by the public agency. 6 Examples of such programs include a “water quality control plan, air quality attainment or maintenance plan, integrated waste management plan, habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, [and] plans or regulations for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.”7Thus, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3) allows a lead agency to make a finding of non-significance for GHG emissions if a project complies with a program and/or other regulatory schemes to reduce GHG emissions. 8 In the absence of any adopted, quantitative threshold, the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment if the Project is found to be consistent with the applicable regulatory plans and policies to reduce GHG emissions, including the emissions reduction measures discussed within CARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan and City of Oxnard’s policies established for the purpose of increasing energy efficiency and reducing GHG emissions. The proposed Project would generate GHG emissions during construction of the Project from the use of off-road construction equipment and on-road trucks and construction worker vehicles. Once fully installed, the Project’s operations would generate GHG emissions from electrical consumption for the billboard lighting. The proposed electronic billboard is estimated to consume an average of approximately 150 kWh per day and approximately 54,000 kWh per year.

Emissions Estimates
Consistent with calculations in Section 3.3, Air Quality, construction emissions were forecasted by assuming a conservative estimate of construction activities (i.e., assuming all construction occurs at the earliest feasible date) and applying the mobile source emissions factors. The emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod software and EMFAC2017.

The output values used in this analysis were adjusted to be Project-specific based on equipment types and the construction schedule. These values were then applied to the same construction phasing assumptions used in the criteria pollutant analysis in Section 3.3, Air Quality, to generate GHG emissions values for the proposed Project (Appendix F includes the assumptions and modeling). Industry standards recommend that construction Project GHG emissions should be “amortized over a 30-year Project lifetime, so that construction GHG emissions are included as part of the operational GHG life cycle. In accordance with 6 14 CCR § 15064(h)(3).
7 14 CCR § 15064(h)(3).
8 See, for example, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD), CEQA Determinations of Significance for Projects Subject to ARB’s GHG Cap-and-Trade Regulation, APR-2025 (June 25, 2014), in which the SJVAPCD “determined that GHG emissions increases that are covered under ABR’s Cap-and-Trade regulation cannot constitute significant increases under CEQA…” Furthermore, the SCAQMD has taken this position in CEQA documents it has produced as a lead agency. The SCAQMD has prepared three Negative Declarations and one Draft Environmental Impact Report that demonstrate the SCAQMD has applied its 10,000 MTCO2e/yr significance threshold in such a way that GHG emissions covered by the Cap-and-Trade Program do not constitute emissions that must be measured against the threshold. See SCAQMD, Final Negative Declaration for Ultramar Inc. Wilmington Refinery Cogeneration Project, SHC No. 2012041014 (October 2014); SCAQMD Final Negative Declaration for Phillips 99 Los Angeles Refinery Carson Plant—Crude Oil Storage Capacity Project, SCH No. 2013091029 (December 2014); SCAQMD Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Toxic Air Contaminant Reduction for Compliance with SCAQMD Rules 1420.1 and 1402 at the Exide Technologies Facility in Vernon, CA, SCH No. 2014101040 (December 2014); and SCAQMD Final Environmental Impact Report for the Breitburn Santa Fe Springs Blocks 400/700 Upgrade Project, SCH No. 2014121014 (August 2015). 1336
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 32 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
this, GHG emissions from construction have been amortized over the 30-year lifetime of the Project and are added to the operational emissions for the determination of significance.

Total estimated construction-related GHG emissions for the Project are estimated at 1.77 metric tons of CO2e (MTCO2e) for off-road construction equipment and 1.38 MTCO2e per year for on-road vehicles for a total of 3.1 MTCO2e. This would equal to approximately

0.1 MTCO2e per year after amortization over 30 years. The construction related GHG emissions are summarized in Table GHG-1, GHG Emissions from Project Construction.

Emissions of GHGs were estimated for operation of the proposed electronic billboard from electricity usage in base year 2022 (based on 2021 energy intensity factor where renewable sources are projected to account for approximately 35 percent of SCEs overall energy mix) and were extrapolated for several milestone years (2030 based on 60 percent renewable sources as required by Senate Bill 100 and 2040 based on 85 percent renewable energy sources) based on a linear projection of 100 percent renewable in 2045 as targeted in SB 100. GHG emissions from construction activities are not adjusted for future year GHG reductions that will occur from medium- and heavy-duty emissions regulations at the federal and state level that will phase in lower emitting, and potentially electric-powered, trucks and equipment over time. This analysis conservatively assumed that the construction equipment and on-road vehicles would be diesel fueled in future years. The operational related GHG emissions are summarized in Table GHG-2, GHG Emissions from Project Operations.

TABLE GHG-1

GHG EMISSIONS FROM PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
Single Billboard Installation GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) Source 2022 2030 2040
Construction On-Road 1.38 1.38 1.38
Construction (off-Road) 1,77 1.77 1.77
Total Construction 3.1 3.1 3.1
Amortized Construction:a 0.1 0.1 0.1
a Construction Emissions are amortized over 30 years
SOURCE: ESA, 2022
1337
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 33 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
TABLE GHG-2

GHG EMISSIONS FROM PROJECT OPERATIONS
Single Billboard Installation GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) Source 2022 2030 2040
Operational (lighting) 9.6 7.3 2.4
Amortized Construction: 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total Project: 9.7 7.4 2.5
SOURCE: ESA, 2022
Compliance with Applicable Plans, Policies, or Regulations Assembly Bill 32/Senate Bill 32 and Executive Order B-30-15 In support of Assembly Bill 32 and Senate Bill 32, the state has promulgated specific laws aimed at GHG reductions applicable to the Project. Executive Order B-30-15 sets a goal of Statewide GHG emissions 40 percent less than 1990 levels by 2030 (this goal was codified in Senate Bill 32). In order to achieve the Statewide GHG reduction target, CARB is required to adopt a Climate Change Scoping Plan that outlines GHG reduction strategies.

The Project would generate GHG emissions due to construction and operational activities; however, its annual GHG emissions would be minimized due to the utilization of fuelefficient equipment consistent with State and federal regulations, such as fuel efficiency regulations in accordance with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Pavley Phase II standards, the anti-idling regulation in accordance with Section 2485 in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, and fuel requirements in accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. The Project would also utilize energy efficient light emitting diode (LED) technology, which is recognized by the U.S.

Department of Energy as the most energy efficient lighting technology (U.S. DOE, n.d.).

The Project’s potential to generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment and conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs is discussed below.
2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan
According to the CARB 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, reductions needed to achieve the 2030 goal are expected to be achieved by targeting specific emission sectors, including those sectors that are not directly controlled or influenced by the Project, but nonetheless contribute to Project-related GHG emissions. Table GHG-3, Project Compliance with Applicable 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Actions and Strategies, contains a list of GHG emission reduction actions and strategies from the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan that would be applicable and relevant to the Project and describes the Project’s compliance with those applicable actions and strategies. 1338
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 34 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
TABLE GHG-3

PROJECT COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE
2017 CLIMATE CHANGE SCOPING PLAN ACTIONS AND STRATEGIES Actions and Strategies
Responsible
Party(ies) Compliance Analysis
Senate Bill 350 (SB 350):

The Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction
Act of 2015 increases the standards of the
California Renewable Portfolio Standard
(RPS) program by requiring that the amount of
electricity generated and sold to retail
customers per year from eligible renewable
energy resources be increased to 50 percent
by 2030.a
Required measures include:

Increase RPS to 50 percent of retail sales by
2030.

Establish annual targets for statewide energy
efficiency savings and demand reduction that
will achieve a cumulative doubling of
statewide energy efficiency savings in
electricity and natural gas end uses by 2030.

Reduce GHG emissions in the electricity
sector through the implementation of the
above measures and other actions as
modeled in IRPs to meet GHG emissions
reductions planning targets in the IRP
process. Load-serving entities and publicly
owned utilities meet GHG emissions
reductions planning targets through a
combination of measures as described in
IRPs.

CPUC, CEC, CARB No Conflict. The Project would use electricity provided by Southern California Edison (SCE), which
is required to meet the energy performance standard
of 60 percent renewable energy by 2030 pursuant to
Senate Bill 100 (which was adopted after SB 350
and is a more stringent target). The Project would
not conflict with this action and strategy.

Implement Mobile Source Strategy (Cleaner
Technology and Fuels):
• Implementation of federal phase 2
standards for medium- and heavy-duty
vehicles.

CARB, CalSTA,
SGC, Caltrans,
CEC, OPR, Local
Agencies
No Conflict. In 2011 the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) and National Highway
Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA)
announced fuel economy and GHG standards for
medium- and heavy-duty trucks for model years
2014–2018. The standards for CO2 emissions and
fuel consumption are tailored to three main vehicle
categories: combination tractors, heavy-duty pickup
trucks and vans, and vocational vehicles. According
to the USEPA, this regulatory program would reduce
GHG emissions and fuel consumption for the
affected vehicles by 6 to 23 percent over the 2010
baseline. Building on the first phase of standards, in
August 2016, the USEPA and NHTSA finalized
Phase 2 standards for medium and heavy-duty
vehicles through model year 2027 that will improve
fuel efficiency and cut carbon pollution. The Phase 2
standards are expected to lower CO2 emissions by
approximately 1.1 billion metric tons.

Project-related heavy-duty mobile source GHG
emissions would be reduced accordingly as the
phase-in of lower emitting trucks occurs in
compliance with the regulation. The Project would
not conflict with this action and strategy.
1339
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 35 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
Actions and Strategies
Responsible
Party(ies) Compliance Analysis
Adopt a Low Carbon Fuel Standard with a
CI reduction of 18 percent.

CARB No Conflict. This regulatory program applies to fuel suppliers, not directly to land use development. GHG
emissions related to vehicular travel associated with
the Project would benefit from this regulation
because fuel used by Project-related vehicles would
be required to comply with Low Carbon Fuel
Standard (LCFS). Mobile source GHG emissions
provided in Table GHG-1 were calculated using
CalEEMod and EMFAC. However, CalEEMod and
EMFAC do not fully include implementation of the
LCFS into mobile source emission factors. Thus,
Table GHG-1 provides conservatively estimated
GHG emissions.

On September 27, 2018, CARB approved an
amendment to the LCFS regulation to require a 20
percent reduction in carbon intensity from a 2010
baseline by 2030. Reductions in carbon intensity are
phased in starting in 2019 with a reduction of 6.25
percent and increases by 1.25 percent each year.

Thus, in 2021, LCFS emissions reductions are 8.75
percent reduced carbon intensity relative to the 2010
baseline. Project-related mobile source GHG
emissions would be reduced accordingly, and would
increase as LCFS compliance increases to 20
percent reduce carbon intensity by 2030 relative to
the 2010 baseline year. The Project would not
conflict with this action and strategy.

Implement the post-2020 Cap-and-Trade
Program with declining annual caps.

CARB No Conflict. Assembly Bill 398 (AB 398) was
enacted in 2017 to extend and clarify the role of the
State’s Cap-and-Trade Program from January 1,
2021, through December 31, 2030. As part of AB
398, refinements were made to the Cap-and-Trade
program to establish updated protocols and
allocation of proceeds to reduce GHG emissions.

Under the Cap-and-Trade program, entities such as
power generation companies and natural gas
processing plants would be required to limit or
reduce GHG emissions. While the Project itself is not
a regulated entity under the Cap-and-Trade
Program, it would result in a reduction of GHG
emissions associated with the Project’s energy
usage, since energy supplied to the Project would be
from a regulated entity. As the Project would not
impede the Program’s progress, the Project is
considered compliant. The Project would not conflict
with this action and strategy.
a Senate Bill 350 (2015–2016 Regular Session) Stats 2015, Ch. 547.

SOURCE: ESA, 2022
1340
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 36 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan and Energy Action Plan The City of Oxnard adopted its 2030 General Plan in October 2011 and includes amendments through December 2016. The 2030 General Plan includes the following applicable goals and implementing policies aimed to reduce GHG emissions. • Goal SC-3 Energy Generation and Increased Efficiency. Energy efficiency performance standards and generation from renewable sources. – General Plan Policy SC-3.10, Alternatives to Power Plant Generation:

Evaluate the feasibility of incorporating alternative sources of power generation such as wind and tidal power into the regional existing power supply grid to reduce reliance on GHG emission producing public utility and privately-owned power plants.

The Oxnard General Plan Goal SC-3 addresses energy efficiency performance standards and generation from renewable sources and includes Policy SC-3.10, which has the goal of incorporating alternative sources of power generation such as wind and tidal power into the regional existing power supply grid to reduce reliance on GHG emission producing public utility and privately-owned power plants. This policy would support the availability of progressively clean forms of electricity, which would minimize the energy impact and GHG emissions from the Project. The Project would not conflict with this action and strategy.

As discussed above, GHG emissions for the Project have been analyzed and disclosed demonstrating that the Project would not generate GHG emissions that would have a significant impact and that the Project would not conflict with applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
c) Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the proposed electronic billboard would result in the annual generation of greenhouse gas emissions that would contribute to potential secondary effects of climate change; however, due to the relatively small amount of annual greenhouse gas emissions (less than 10 MTCO2e and progressively reducing in future years as shown in Table GHG-2), the Project’s contribution to climate change impacts is nominal and considered less than significant.

References
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), 2008. CEQA & Climate Change Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. http://www.capcoa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf.

California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), 2010, Model Policies for Greenhouse Gases in General Plans A Resource for Local Government to Incorporate General Plan Policies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions, http://www.capcoa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-ModelPolicies-6-12-09-915am.pdf. 1341
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 37 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
City of Oxnard, 2013, Energy Action Plan, A Component of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan. https://www.oxnard.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/OxnardEAP4.2013.pdf.

U.S. Department of Energy, n.d., LED Lighting, https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/ledlighting, accessed February 2022. 1342
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 38 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.6 Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
c) Would the project directly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
d) Would the project disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside of dedicated
cemeteries?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
e) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a
site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of the size and scope
of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k).
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a
site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of the size and scope
of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resources determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) No Impact. The Project site is located within the RiverPark Specific Plan that encompasses 701 acres. An archival and historic records search was conducted as part of the RiverPark Specific Plan EIR that was prepared in 2001. Two prehistoric archaeological sites were identified within one-half mile radius of the 701-acre RiverPark Specific Plan. No archaeological sites were recorded within the 701-acre site. A Phase I Archaeological Survey was conducted in 2000 as part of the RiverPark Specific Plan EIR. In 2000, the ground surface was examined by walking transects across the 701-acre RiverPark Specific Plan site. The transects were spaced at 15-meter intervals to identify artifacts that might be present on the ground surface. No archaeological artifacts were found in the vicinity of the Project site during the Phase 1 survey, but a mixed scatter of historical debris was found in the extreme southeastern portion of the RiverPark Specific Plan area approximately 300 feet southeast of the Project site. The survey did not find evidence of an intact historical 1343
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 39 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
deposit or site within this area (W&S Consultants, 2000 and Impact Sciences, Inc. 2001).

In 2016, the area of the previously known historical debris was developed as a commercial center in 2016.

In 2001, buildings and structures within the RiverPark Specific Plan were also evaluated to determine if they were eligible for the National or the California Registers. There were no buildings or structures in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. Therefore, no impacts to historical resources would occur with Project implementation. b) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed above, no archaeological resources were found in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. Although no known resources were discovered, there could be an inadvertent discovery. Therefore, there is a negligible potential for archaeological resources to be found and if they are found, construction activities could cause significant impacts to the unknown resources.

Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Prior to ground disturbance, the applicant is required to retain a City-approved archaeologist and Native American Monitor for monitoring of ground disturbing activities. In the event that archaeological resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, these activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until a qualified archaeologist has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside the buffer area. All archaeological resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be historic, Native American Tribes/Individuals shall be contacted and consulted and Native American construction monitoring shall be initiated. The Applicant and the City shall coordinate with the archaeologist to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.

Implementation of the above mitigation measure would reduce the potential impacts on unknown archaeological resources to less than significant. c) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on a review of the U.S.

Geological Survey map for Oxnard, the Project site is underlain by Holocene alluvial deposits (CDC, 2003). Holocene alluvium is thought to be too young to contain significant paleontological resources. Therefore, near surface grading would result in less than significant impacts to paleontological resources. However, based on the drilling depth of 40 feet for the proposed billboard pole, the Holocene alluvium could be underlain by more sensitive geologic sediment that could have a high potential to contain paleontological resources. Therefore, construction activities associated with the proposed billboard pole, could result in significant impacts to paleontological resources. 1344
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 40 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Prior to ground disturbance, the applicant is required to retain a City-approved paleontologist for monitoring of ground disturbing activities. In the event that paleontological resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, these activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and collected. Monitoring shall include matrix screening for the presence of microfossils; however, monitoring is largely a visual inspection of sediment.

With the implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2, potential impacts on paleontological resources would be reduced to less than significant. d) Less than Significant Impact. No human remains are known to exist on or in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. If human remains are inadvertently encountered, all work is required to halt, and the Ventura County Coroner is required to be contacted in accordance with California Public Resources Code 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. If the coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) would be notified in accordance with State law. Compliance with the State law would ensure that potential impacts on human remains would be reduced to less than significant. e, f) No Impact. The City of Oxnard sent a notification letter on November 23, 2021 to the Native American tribe that is on the City’s Assembly Bill (AB) 52 list (Appendix C). This list includes only one tribe, Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians, that has requested notification of projects within the City in accordance with AB 52.

The act amended California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.94, and added PRC Sections 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2, and 21084.3. AB 52 applies specifically to projects for which a NOP or a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or MND will be filed on or after July 1, 2015. The primary intent of AB 52 was to include California Native American Tribes early in the environmental review process and to establish a new category of resources related to Native Americans that require consideration under the CEQA, known as tribal cultural resources (as defined in PRC Section 21074(a)). On July 30, 2016, the California Natural Resources Agency adopted the final text for tribal cultural resources update to CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, which was approved by the Office of Administrative Law on September 27, 2016.

PRC Section 21080.3.1 requires that within 14 days of a lead agency determining that an application for a project is complete, or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency provide formal notification to the designated contact, or a tribal representative, of California Native American Tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the Project (as defined in PRC Section 21073) and who have requested in writing to be informed by the lead agency (PRC Section 21080.3.1(b)). Tribes interested in consultation must respond in writing within 30 days from receipt of the lead agency’s formal notification and the lead agency must begin 1345
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 41 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
consultation within 30 days of receiving the tribe’s request for consultation (PRC Sections 21080.3.1(d) and 21080.3.1(e)).

PRC Section 21080.3.2(a) identifies the following as potential consultation discussion topics: the type of environmental review necessary; the significance of tribal cultural resources; the significance of the Project’s impacts on the tribal cultural resources; Project alternatives or appropriate measures for preservation; and mitigation measures.

Consultation is considered concluded when either: (1) the parties agree to measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect, if a significant effect exists, on a tribal cultural resource; or (2) a party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached (PRC Section 21080.3.2(b)).

If a California Native American tribe has requested consultation pursuant to Section 21080.3.1 and has failed to provide comments to the lead agency, or otherwise failed to engage in the consultation process, or if the lead agency has complied with Section 21080.3.1(d) and the California Native American tribe has failed to request consultation within 30 days, the lead agency may certify an EIR or adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (PRC Section 21082.3(d)(2) and (3)).

The Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians was notified of the Project, but did not request consultation with the City of Oxnard regarding the proposed Project. There are no known tribal cultural resources located on the Project site, and therefore, no impacts to known tribal cultural resources would occur.

References
California Department of Conservation (CDC), California Geological Survey. 2003. Geologic Map of the Oxnard 7.5’ Quadrangle, Ventura County, California: A Digital Database, Version 1.0.

Impact Sciences, Inc. 2001. RiverPark Specific Plan Draft EIR. Available at:
https://www.oxnard.org/environmental-document-archives/. Accessed on February 11, 2022.

W&S Consultants. 2000. Phase I Archaeological Survey for the RiverPark Specific Plan Area.

December 14.
1346
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 42 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.7 Geology and Soils
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project expose people or structures to
potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking that cannot be
addressed through compliance with standard
Code requirements?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project and potentially result in on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse that cannot be addressed
through compliance with standard Code
requirements?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Would the project be located on expansive soil,
creating substantial risk to life or property that cannot be addressed through compliance with standard Code
requirements?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Would the project expose people or structures to
inundation by seiche or tsunami? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Would the project rely on dredging or other
maintenance activity by another agency that is not
guaranteed to continue?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a.i) Less than Significant Impact. A fault is a plane or surface in the earth along which failure has occurred and materials on opposite sides have moved relative to one another in response to the accumulation and release of stress. The U.S. Geological Survey defines active faults as those that have had surface displacements within Holocene time (about the last 11,000 years). Potentially active faults are those that have had surface displacement during Quaternary time, within the last 1.6 million years. Based on a review of the City of Oxnard General Plan Background Report, the most regionally active faults in the vicinity of the City of Oxnard are the Oak Ridge, Pitas Point-Ventura, Red Mountain, Anacapa, and Malibu Coast faults. The nearest active fault to the Project site is the Pitas PointVentura fault which is located approximately four miles north of the Project site (Matrix Design Group, Inc., 2006). Due to the distance to the nearest active fault, impacts from a fault rupture at the Project site would be less than significant. a.ii) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in Southern California, an area that is subject to strong seismic ground shaking. Seismically induced ground acceleration is the shaking motion that is produced by an earthquake. As noted in Section 3.7 a.i) above, there are regionally active faults in the vicinity of the City of Oxnard. Earthquake activity associated with these faults could cause ground shaking at the Project site. The proposed 1347
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 43 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
Project is subject to the seismic design criteria of the most recent California Building Code (CBC) which has been adopted within the Oxnard City Code. The criteria contain seismic safety provisions with the aim of preventing building and structural collapse during an earthquake. Adherence to these criteria would result in less than significant seismic ground shaking impacts on the proposed Project.
b) Less than Significant Impact. Unstable geologic units or soils commonly occur when there are landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence/collapse, or liquefaction.

Landslides
Because the Project site is located on relatively flat terrain, the Project would not be subject to potential unstable soils due to landslides.

Lateral Spreading
Lateral spreading movement occurs when a soil mass slides laterally on liquefied soil layers, moving downslope or towards a free face. Based on a review of the RiverPark Specific Plan EIR, the potential for lateral spreading in the Project area appears to be low.

Therefore, less than significant lateral spreading impacts would occur on the Project site.

Subsidence/Collapse
Subsidence or collapse is the sinking of the ground surface caused by the compression of earth materials resulting from manmade activities, such as groundwater or oil and gas withdrawal. The resulting compression typically occurs only once within affected soils and cannot be repeated during fluctuations of the groundwater level or from peat oxidation.

Historic groundwater withdrawals have caused some regional subsidence. There are no known active groundwater wells in the immediate vicinity of the Project site, therefore, there is a low potential for subsidence/collapse at the site. As a result, potential effects from land subsidence/collapse would be less than significant. The potential for subsidence/collapse from peat oxidation on the Project site is not likely because of the absence of peat deposits in the borings that were taken as part of the RiverPark Specific Plan. Similarly, subsidence/collapse from oil and gas withdrawal is not likely because there are no known active oil or natural gas wells in the Project vicinity over the past 20 years.

Overall, effects from land subsidence/collapseon the Project would be less than significant.

Liquefaction
Liquefaction is a phenomenon that occurs when soil undergoes transformation from a solid state to a liquefied condition due to the effects of increased pore-water pressure. This typically occurs where susceptible soils (particularly soils in the medium sand to silt range) are located over a high groundwater table. A high groundwater table is described as one within 50 feet of the surface. Because the proposed Project is subject to the seismic design criteria of the most recent California Building Code (CBC) which has been adopted within the Oxnard City Code and the CBC includes provisions to prevent liquefaction impacts, the potential liquefaction impacts to the Project would be less than significant. 1348
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 44 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
c) Less than Significant Impact. Expansive soil is characterized by a clay composition whereby clay particles expand dramatically upon wetting. Structures constructed on expansive soils require special design considerations that are identified within the CBC.

Based on a review of the RiverPark Specific Plan EIR, the Specific Plan area generally consists of granular materials (silty sand, well-graded sand, sandy silt, and some clayey silt) that are not expected to be expansive. Conformance with the design criteria within the CBC would prevent substantive expansive soils. Therefore, potential expansive soil impact to the Project would be less than significant.
d) No Impact. Seiches and tsunamis are caused by earthquakes. Seiches are waves caused by large-scale, short-duration oscillation of confined bodies of water (such as reservoirs and lakes) during earthquakes that may damage low-lying adjacent areas, although not as severely as a tsunami. The closest enclosed body of water that could result in earthquakeinduced seiche is Lake Piru which is approximately 30 miles northeast of the Project site.

Due to the distance of Lake Piru, potential seiches in the lake would not impact the Project site. Tsunamis are earthquake-induced surge waves that can cause severe coastal flooding.

Because the Project site is located approximately five miles from the coast and at approximately elevation 80 feet above mean sea level, the Project site is not at risk from a tsunami. Implementation of the Project would not be impacted by seiches or tsunamis. e) No Impact. The Project is located in a developed area adjacent to U.S. 101, and the Project would be located on a city-owned property. The operation of the Project would not rely on maintenance activities under the purview of other agencies aside from the City of Oxnard.

The Project would have no impact.

References
Matrix Design Group, Inc. 2006. City of Oxnard General Plan Draft Background Report.

Available at https://www.oxnard.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/08/OxnardDraftBackgroundReport2006_04.21.06.pdf. Accessed on February 16, 2022.
1349
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 45 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset or accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the environment?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Would the project emit hazardous substances or
involve handling hazardous or acutely hazardous
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school in quantities or a manner
that would create a substantial hazard?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Would the project be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,
as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Would the project impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) Less than Significant Impact. Construction activities required for the proposed electronic billboard would involve site clearing, grading, drilling, trenching to connect to an existing electrical line and other ground-disturbing activities. These construction activities would temporarily require the use of equipment such as trucks, drill, concrete mixer, crane, and other powered equipment, and would use potentially hazardous materials, such as fuels (gasoline and diesel) and lubricants (oil and grease). In addition, construction may use hazardous materials, such as solvents, paints, thinners, or other chemicals. Such materials would be used only in small quantities based on the minimal activities associated with the installation of an electronic billboard. These materials would be transported, handled, stored and disposed of in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and manufacturers’ instructions. Compliance with these existing regulations would result in a less than significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials. As such, impacts during construction would be less than significant.

Operation of the proposed electronic billboard would result in periodic maintenance activities of the billboard. These activities may include the limited use of paints, solvents and other chemicals. However, given the periodic nature of maintenance, the potential to create a hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials during operational activities would be less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact. As stated above, the maintenance activities associated with the proposed new electronic billboard may use a limited quantity of hazardous materials such as paints, solvents and other chemicals. However, because these activities are periodic 1350
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 46 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
and the use of potential hazardous materials is limited, the Project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.

The Project would result in a less than significant impact. c) Less than Significant Impact. There are no existing or proposed schools within 0.25-mile of the Project site. The nearest school is Sierra Linda Elementary that is located approximately 0.9-mile southwest of the Project site. Since there are no schools within

0.25-mile of the Project site, construction and operational activities associated with the Project are not expected to cause risk to the public or nearby attendees of schools.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
d) No Impact. Government Code Section 65962.5 requires CalEPA to develop and annually update the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List. The information contained in the Cortese List is provided by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and other state and local government agencies. A review of the DTSC EnviroStor and State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker databases did not indicate any hazardous materials sites within the Project site. A Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) cleanup site was identified approximately 350 feet southeast of the Project site, where existing commercial retail buildings are located. The site was investigated for potential contamination of underlying groundwater due to the accidental release of diesel and the case for the LUST was closed by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in 1998, indicating that the LUST no longer poses a threat for groundwater contamination (SWRCB 1998). The proposed Project would not require ground disturbing activities in close proximity to the closed LUST cleanup site.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The Project site is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.19.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.
e) No Impact. The Projectsite is located in an undeveloped lot between Riverpark Boulevard and U.S. 101. Project construction and operational activities would occur onsite, and these activities would not result in changes to the transportation circulation, an existing emergency response plan, or evacuation plan. Therefore, no impact would occur.

References
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), 1998. GeoTracker Database.

MacValley/McCaslin Oil (T0611100537). Available at:
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0611100537. Accessed on February 28, 2022.
1351
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 47 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level that would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Would the project substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in on- or off-site flooding or exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Would the project place new structures within a 100- year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazard delineation map?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Would the project impede or redirect flood flows such that it would increase on- or off-site flood potential? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Would the project expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
g) Would the project be exposed to a substantial risk
related to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) Less than Significant Impact. Construction activities associated with the Project could result in short-term surface water quality impacts. These potential impacts could occur from construction-related activities such as drilling for the electronic sign pole foundation and pouring concrete as well as the trenching for the electrical line. Runoff of loose soils and/or construction wastes and fuel during a rainstorm could flow into local storm drains as a result of Project construction. Such contaminated runoff could potentially threaten downstream water resources that receive runoff from the local drainage network. Standard construction BMPs such as silt fencing, storm drain inlet protection, and proper material and waste storage will ensure surface water quality is not substantially degraded during construction. Compliance with the City’s standard stormwater runoff provisions for construction activities, such as runoff control and other measures set forth in the City of Oxnard Code Section 22-222 would ensure that the Project does not violate any water quality standards or any waste discharge requirements during construction (City of Oxnard, Nd). Due to the lack of significant grading, earth-moving activities, and paving as part of the Project, the potential water quality impact from construction activities would be less than significant.
1352
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 48 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
Operation activities associated with the electronic billboard would not involve the use of water or the generation of wastewater. Therefore, no violation of any water quality standards or any waste discharge requirements would occur, and thus no water quality impact would result.
b) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project includes construction activities to install an electronic billboard, trenching for an electrical line and the placement of landscaping. The proposed billboard would not require water to operate. The Project includes the removal of existing eucalyptus trees along U.S. 101 and the planting of drought tolerant tree species including carpe myrtle, western redbud and vitex. The proposed billboard will include an approximately 7-foot diameter hole for the proposed 5- foot diameter pole that will be set into concrete. The Project also includes trenching for approximately 40 feet to connect the Project to an existing electrical facility. The Project site currently provides little to no infiltration of water into groundwater aquifers. The Project site does not support any groundwater production systems, and construction and operation of the proposed electronic billboardwould not interfere with the operation of any production system. The proposed Project would not substantially change the amount of existing impervioussurface area and would not have a substantial impact on groundwater recharge. The Project also includes trenching for the proposed electric power line to connect with the existing line and would extend approximately 40 linear feet. The construction of the 7-foot diameter hole that would extend approximately 50 feet into the ground may encounter groundwater that would need to be extracted for construction of the pole location. The extraction of the groundwater would not be substantial because it would be limited for a 7-foot diameter pole. Implementation of the proposed Project would result in less than significant groundwater impacts.
c) No Impact. The Project site is undeveloped and has relatively flat topography. No stream or water resource features occur on the Projectsite. In addition, the proposed Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of a course, stream or river, or through the addition of impervious surfaces as the installation of the proposed electronic billboard would nominally increase impervious surfaces on the site. As such, no impact would occur. d) No Impact. Based on a review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, the Project site is not located in a flood prone area including a 100-year flood zone (FEMA, 2010). Therefore, the Project would not place the pole for the electronic billboard or trench for the proposed electrical line within a flood prone area. No impact would occur. e) No Impact. The implementation of the Project includesthe placement of a 5-foot diameter pole within a 7-foot diameter hole on the Project site and includes approximately 40 linear feet of trenching for the placement of an electrical line. The placement of the pole and electrical linewould not impede or redirect existing surface drainage flows from the Project site.
1353
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 49 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
f) Less than Significant Impact. Based on a review of the Ventura County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, the majority of the City of Oxnard including the Project site is within a dam inundation area (AECOM, 2015). Although the Project site is subject to inundation due to a failure of a dam upstream along the Santa Clara River, the probability of dam failure inundation is not known but such an event would likely be the result of an extreme storm. The Division of Safety and Dams periodically checks the conditions of dams so that the likelihood for a dam failure is further reduced. The existing levee along the Santa Clara River is currently being evaluated to reconstruct to provide greater protection for urban uses. There is a potential for a breach of the levee prior to reconstruction of the levee.

Because the proposed electronic billboard would be installed with concrete approximately 40 feet below ground surface and the proposed electronic billboard is located approximately 0.8 mile from the levee, a potential breach of the levee would result in a less than significant impact on the proposed electronic billboard. Overall, the potential inundation at the Project site would result in a less than significant impact on the proposed electronic billboard and would not result in exposing people to injury or death. g) No Impact. Based on a review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, the Project site is not located in a flood prone area (FEMA, 2010). As discussed in Section 3.9 d) above, the Project site would not be subject to seiches or tsunamis. The Project site and surrounding area contain relatively flat terrain and are not subject to mudflows. Therefore, the Project would not be exposed to substantial risk related to inundation by a seiche, tsunami or mudflow at the Project site.

References
AECOM. 2015. Ventura County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. Available at:
https://www.vcfloodinfo.com/pdf/2015%20Ventura%20County%20MultiHazard%20Mitigation%20Plan%20and%20Appendices.pdf. Accessed on February 18, 2022.

City of Oxnard. Nd. City of Oxnard Code of Ordinances, Section 22-222, Construction Development. Available at:
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/oxnard/latest/oxnard_ca/0-0-0-45944. Accessed on February 17, 2022.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2010. Flood Insurance Rate Map, Ventura County, California, Panel 910 of 1275, Map Number 06111C0910E. Available at:
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=Riverpark%20Oxnard%20Ca#searchres ultsanchor. Accessed on February 18, 2022.
1354
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 50 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.10 Land Use and Planning
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of the City or other agency
with jurisdiction over the project adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating a significant
environmental effect?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project involve land uses that are not
allowed under any applicable airport land use
compatibility plan?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
a) Would the project conflict with an applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation
plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Would the project physically divide an established
community?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) Less than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section 3.1 c), based on a review of the existing City of Oxnard sign regulations within the City of Oxnard Municipal Code, the proposed electronic billboard is not currently an allowed use within the City of Oxnard.

However, as discussed within Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Urban Design, the implementation of the proposed electronic billboard would result in less than significant impacts to scenic vistas, scenic resources, and scenic highways, and the Project would result a less than significant visual alteration of the existing visual characteristics as well as less than significant light and glare. In addition, the City is currently processing a separate Ordinance amendment to allow electronic billboards prior to approval of the Project, and the Project design complies with the proposed Ordinance regulations. The Project includes an amendment to the RiverPark Specific Plan and a Development Agreement to ensure Project consistency. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with a regulation of the City (i.e., the City of Oxnard Municipal Code or the RiverPark Specific Plan) that was adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating a significant environmental effect.
b) Less than Significant Impact. The Project is located approximately 2.5 miles from the Oxnard Airport. According to the Oxnard Airport Master Plan, obstructions to air navigation in the vicinity of the Project site would occur if structures exceeded 350 feet in elevation (Coffman Associates, Inc., 2004). Because the Project includes an electronic billboard that will include a height of 60 feet above the ground, the implementation of the Project would not impact air navigation.
c) No Impact. According to the City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan EIR, no established or planned Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan exists within the City of Oxnard (Matrix Design Group, 2009). Therefore, the Project would not result in any impact associated with these plans.
1355
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 51 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
d) No Impact. Construction of the proposed electronic billboard includes the placement of a pole in the ground. The proposed billboard would not physically divide the surrounding community since the proposed sign would not obstruct or in any way change access to the existing community. The Project site is located in an existing undeveloped lot and would not impact any roadways or traffic circulation patterns within the existing community. The proposed electronic billboard Project would not create any barriers to access to a community or require removal of any housing. As such, the proposed Project would have no impact.

References
Coffman Associates, Inc. 2004. Airport Master Plan for Oxnard Airport. Available at:
https://vcportal.ventura.org/AIRPORTS/docs/document_library/Master_Plan_OXR_2004.p df. Accessed on February 18, 2022.

Matrix Design Group. 2009. City of Oxnard General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report.

Available at: https://www.oxnard.org/city-department/communitydevelopment/planning/2030-general-plan/. Accessed on February 18, 2022. 1356
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 52 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.11 Mineral Resources
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource of value to the region or
state?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site
delineated in the 2030 General Plan or other adopted
land use plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) No Impact. Based on a review of the RiverPark Specific Plan EIR, the Project site is located in an area identified as RiverPark Specific Plan Area ‘A’. The City has designated this area for urban uses since 1986 and mining within this area, including the Project site, would be economically infeasible due to its location and expected poor quality of materials recovered (Impact Sciences, 2001). The proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of important mineral resources. No impacts to mineral resources would occur with the implementation of the proposed Project.
b) No Impact. Because the Project site has been designated for urban development since 1986 and currently designated Regional Commercial uses, the City of Oxnard General Plan has not designated the Project site as a mineral resource recovery area (City of Oxnard, 2014).

Therefore, the implementation of the Project would not impact a locally-important mineral resource recovery site.

References
City of Oxnard. 2014. City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan Map. Available at:
https://www.oxnard.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/03/203020GENERAL20PLAN2030x402009.14V3-1.pdf. Accessed on February 22, 2022.

Impact Sciences. RiverPark Specific Plan Draft EIR. 2001. Available at:
https://www.oxnard.org/environmental-document-archives/. Accessed on February 22, 2022.
1357
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 53 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.12 Noise
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project generate or expose persons to
noise levels exceeding standards established in the
Oxnard 2030 General Plan or Noise Ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project generate or expose persons to
excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne
noise levels?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Would the project generate a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the project?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Would the project generate a substantial permanent
increase in ambient noise in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) For a project located within the airport land use plan for Oxnard Airport or within two miles of Naval Base,
Ventura County at Point Mugu, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Would the project expose non-human species to
excessive noise? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
Discussion
a) Less than Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed electronic billboard would result in noise increases during construction activities and noise increases during operation due to periodic maintenance activities.

Construction activities will include the placement of a pole 50 feet into the ground and extension of the pole 60 feet above the ground as well as trenching for the proposed electrical line. The construction activities will also include the removal of the existing eucalyptus trees within the existing U.S. 101 right-of-way and plant replacement trees. The placement of the proposed pole will result in the highest noise levels during construction and would require the following construction equipment for each construction activity:

Drill footing/haul and dispose dirt (1 to 2 days)
• 48’ Flatbed Truck & Trailer
• Caterpillar 262D Skid Steer Loader
• LoDril HT Drill Mounted on a John Deere 270D
• 5 Super 10 Dump Trucks rotating dumps
Column Set/Concrete Pour (1 to 2 days)
• Link Belt HTC8690 90 Ton Mobile Crane Truck
• Elliott L140 Hireach Crane Truck
1358
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 54 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
• 4 Concrete Mixing Trucks
• Concrete Rock Pump Trailer
Set Top of Column and Build & Set Structure (1 to 2 days) • 2 - 48’ Flatbed Truck & Trailer
• Grove GMK5275 – 275 Ton Mobile Crane Truck
• Elliott L140 Hireach Crane Truck
• Ingersoll Rand P-1000-W-D Towable Air Compressor
Build and Set Digital Displays(1 to 2 days)
• 2 - 48’ Flatbed Truck & Trailer
• Link Belt HTC8690 90 Ton Crane Mounted on flatbed truck • Elliott L140 Hireach Crane Truck
As a worst-case evaluation, there is an assumption that the drill footing/haul and dirt disposal as well as the column set/concrete pour activities could occur in one day. Table N-1 provides estimated construction noise levels at 50 feet, 100 feet and 200 feet.

TABLE N-1
CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELa
Activity Noise Level, dBA Leq
Drill Footing/Haul and Dispose Dirt, and Column
Set/Concrete Pour
At 50 feet 82/83
At 100 feet 76/77
At 200 feet 70/71
Set Top of Column and Build & Set Structure
At 50 feet 80
At 100 feet 74
At 200 feet 68
Build and Set Digital Displays
At 50 feet 79
At 100 feet 73
At 200 feet 67
a Based on equipment identified above that was provided by the Project applicant.

SOURCE: Client and ESA 2022
The nearest existing residences to the Project site is approximately 145 feet north of the site. As shown above, the highest construction noise levels at 100 feet would be approximately 77 dBA Leq. These residences are also located approximately 280 feet from 1359
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 55 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
the centerline of U.S. 101. Based on Caltrans peak hour traffic volume information (6,954 automobiles, 207 medium trucks and 139 heavy trucks) adjacent to the Project site, traffic noise levels at approximately 200 feet from the freeway centerline would be 75.6 dBA Leq which is similar to the noise level that would be experienced during construction activities.

Construction noise levels are considered significant if noise levels are not consistent with the City of Oxnard Noise Ordinance or are not consistent with the 2030 General Plan noise policies.

City of Oxnard Noise Ordinance
In accordance with Section 7-188 of the City’s Municipal Code, sound sources associated with or created by construction, repair, remodeling or grading of any real property are exempt, provided the activities occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Because the Project would include construction activities between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, the construction noise levels are considered less than significant.

Operational noise levels would occur during periodic maintenance activities. These activities would be required to repair and maintain the proposed electronic billboard. These maintenance activities would include a nominal number of trucks traveling to the Project site and result in less than significant truck traffic noise. In addition, the repair and maintenance activities that would periodically occur onsite would be considered exempt and result in nominal increases in noise levels to the surrounding uses. These periodic maintenance activities would only occur during the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Therefore, long-term operational activities associated with the proposed electronic billboard would result in less than significant noise impacts.

City of Oxnard Safety & Hazards Element
The Safety & Hazards Element includes noise policies. The applicable policies are related to construction noise (City of Oxnard, 2016). Because the operational activities would include periodic maintenance activities that would generate nominal noise levels, the operational-related noise policies are not applicable to the Project. The following construction noise policies are applicable to the Project.

SH-6.1 Construction Noise Control – Provide best practices guidelines to developers for reducing potential noise impacts on surrounding land uses.

As described above, noise levels associated with construction activities at the nearest residences would be similar to the noise levels associated with freeway traffic along U.S. 101. Therefore, construction activities would not require best practices to reduce anticipated construction noise.

SH-6.2 Limiting Construction Activities – Continue to limit construction activities to the hours of 7 am to 7 pm, Monday through Saturday. No construction shall occur after hours, on Sundays, or national holidays without permission from the city. 1360
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 56 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
As also described above, construction activities would be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturday. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with this goal.
b) Less than Significant Impact. Construction equipment generates ground vibration.

Operational activities associated with the Project would generate ground vibration with vehicles traveling on roadways.

The City of Oxnard does not have vibration criteria standards; however, there are federal vibration criteria that have been adopted by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The vibration damage criteria for structures in the Project vicinity is 0.5 peak particle velocity (PPV). The vibration criteria for human annoyance is 72 vibration decibels (VdB) (Federal Transit Authority, 2018). Based on the review of the FTA vibration levels by type of equipment, the highest level of vibration from a piece of equipment that would be used during the Project construction activities would occur from a loaded truck that generates

0.076 PPV and 86 VdB at 25 feet. At the nearest residence located at approximately 145 feet north of the Project site, the residence would be exposed to 0.006 PPV and 63 VdB that are less than the 0.5 PPV vibration damage criteria and less than the 72 VdB human annoyance criteria. Therefore, construction activities associated with the Project would result in less than significant vibration impacts.

Long-term maintenance activities would result in periodic trucks accessing the Project site; however, trucks accessing the site would result in nominal increases in the typical vibration levels that are experienced from daily vehicles traveling along Riverpark Boulevard.

Therefore, long-term vibration impacts associated with the Project would be less than significant.
c) Less than Significant Impact. The implementation of the Project would result in temporary and periodic increases in noise levels. As discussed above, temporary noise levels would occur during construction activities associated with the electronic billboard.

As a worst-case assumption, noise levels at the nearest residence could reach up to 77 dBA Leq while vehicular noise levels from U.S. 101 at the same nearest residence would be approximately 75.5 dBA Leq. This potential increase of 1.5 dBA Leq would not be considered substantial for construction activities. In addition, the City considers construction activities as significant if construction noise does not occur within the Noise Ordinance timing restriction. Because the Project would include construction activities within the allowed times of day, the Project would result in a less than significant temporary noise impact.

As discussed above, long-term maintenance activities associated with the proposed electronic billboard would occur. However, these periodic activities would result in nominal increases in noise and would be considered less than significant. d) No Impact. Operation of the proposed electronic billboard would not generate permanent noise. Therefore, the implementation of the Project would result in no long-term permanent noise impact.
1361
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 57 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
e) No Impact. There are no public airports or private airstrips within two miles of the Project site. The closest airport is the Oxnard Airport located approximately 2.5 miles southwest of the Project site in the City of Oxnard. The next closest airport is the Camarillo Airport which is located approximately 4.0 miles southeast of the Project site. Because the Project does not include people residing on the site, and the site is over two miles from the nearest airport, the Project would not expose people to excessive airport noise levels. Therefore, no impact would occur.
f) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed in Section 3.4 d) above, the implementation of the Project could impact nesting bird species associated with the eucalyptus trees that are proposed to be removed as part of the Project. In addition, trees that are in the Project vicinity could also include nesting birds that could be impacted from the construction-related noise associated with the Project. This increase in noise could result in a significant noise impact to nesting birds.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 from Section 3.4 d) is required.

With the implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 for nesting birds, potential impacts to nesting birds would be reduced to less than significant.

References
City of Oxnard. 2016. 2030 General Plan Goals and Policies, Safety & Hazards Element.

Available at: https://www.oxnard.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Oxnard-2030-GeneralPlan-Amend-06.2017-SM.pdf. Accessed on February 28, 2022.

Federal Transit Administration. 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis. 1362
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 58 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.13 Population, Education, and Housing
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project involve a General Plan amendment
that could result in an increase in population beyond
that projected in the 2030 General Plan that may
result in one or more significant physical
environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Would the project induce substantial growth on the
project site or surrounding area, resulting in one or
more significant physical environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Would the project result in a substantial (15 singlefamily or 25 multi-family dwelling units – about onehalf block) net loss of housing units through demolition, conversion, or other means that may
necessitate the development of replacement housing?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Would the project result in a net loss of existing
housing units affordable to very low- or low-income
households (as defined by federal and/or City
standards), through demolition, conversion, or other
means that may necessitate the development of
replacement housing?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Would the project cause an increase in enrollment at local public schools that would exceed capacity and
necessitate the construction of new or expanded
facilities?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Would the project directly or indirect interfere with the operation of an existing or planned school?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed Project includes the installation of a digital electronic billboard on a site that currently is designated Regional Commercial within the 2030 General Plan (City of Oxnard, 2014). The placement of the billboard does not require a general plan amendment and would not increase population beyond that projected in the 2030 General Plan. Therefore, the Project would result in no impact on population. b) No Impact. The proposed Project includes the installation of a digital electronic billboard.

The operation of the billboard would not result in the inducement of growth on the Project site or surrounding area because the operation would not require an onsite employee to operate the billboard.
c) No Impact. The implementation of the electronic billboard is on a site that does not contain any existing housing. Therefore, the implementation of the Project would result in no impact on existing housing.
d) No Impact. As stated above, the implementation of the electronic billboard is on a site that does not contain any existing housing. Therefore, the implementation of the Project would result in no impact on existing housing, including existing affordable housing units. 1363
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 59 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
e) No Impact. Because the Project would not result in new housing or employment opportunities, the implementation of the Project would not impact enrollment at local public schools.
f) No Impact. The nearest school to the Project site is Rio Vista Middle School located approximately 0.5-mile north of the Project site. Construction and operation of the proposed billboard would not directly or indirectly interfere with the operation of a school.

References
City of Oxnard. 2014. City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan Map. Available at:
https://www.oxnard.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/03/203020GENERAL20PLAN2030x402009.14V3-1.pdf. Accessed on February 28, 2022.
1364
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 60 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.14 Public Services and Recreation
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project increase demand for fire protection service such that new or expanded facilities would be
needed to maintain acceptable service levels, the
construction of which may have significant
environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Would the project increase demand for law
enforcement service such that new or expanded
facilities would be needed to maintain acceptable
service levels, the construction of which may have
significant environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Would the project increase the use of existing park
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated or that new or expanded park facilities would be needed to
maintain acceptable service levels?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Would the project increase the need for or use of
existing library or other community facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) No Impact. The operation of the proposed electronic billboard would add a structure that would be served by the City of Oxnard Fire Department Station 7 that is located approximately one-mile northeast of the Project site (City of Oxnard, 2022a). No employees would be located on the Project site, and therefore, the addition of the proposed billboard would not require the addition of a new fire station or modifications to an existing fire station to serve the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact on fire protection services.
b) No Impact. The Project site is located approximately 2.3 miles north of the City of Oxnard Police Department and located within Neighborhood Policing Beat 14 (City of Oxnard, 2022b). The proposed Project includes an electronic billboard that would not result in a demand for police protection servicesbecause there are no employees that would be located on the Project site. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on police protection services.
c) No Impact. The proposed Project would not generate employees and would not increase the use of existing park facilities. Therefore, the Project would not result in the physical deterioration of existing park facilities.
d) No Impact. The proposed Project would not generate employees and would not increase the use of existing libraries or other community facilities. Therefore, the Project would not impact libraries or community facilities.
1365
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 61 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
References
City of Oxnard. 2022a. City of Oxnard Fire Department, Fire Station Locations. Available at:
https://www.oxnard.org/fire-station-locations-fire-department/. Accessed on February 28, 2022.

City of Oxnard. 2022b. Oxnard Police Department, Neighborhood Policing Beat Coordinator Map. Available at: https://sites.google.com/oxnardpd.org/2020-beat-map/police-beat-map Accessed on February 28, 2022.
1366
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 62 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.15 Transportation and Circulation
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project conflict with a program plan,
ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian
facilities?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency
access? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the proposed electronic billboard and trenching for an electrical line would generate a nominal number of construction vehicle trips for the activities to place the electronic billboard on the Project site and trench for approximately 40 feet to the adjacent electrical enclosure that is located south of Riverpark Boulevard. This nominal number of trips would not conflict with the circulation system and result in less than significant impacts. In addition, the trenching for the electrical line would not impact automobile circulation or the pedestrian pathway located along Riverpark Boulevard. In addition, long-term activities associated with the Project include periodic visits to the site for maintenance. These periodic visits would also result in less than significant impacts to the surrounding circulation system. b) No Impact. The proposed Project would include periodic maintenance vehicle trips to the site, as needed, and would not require daily vehicle trips to the site for operation of the electronic billboard. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on vehicle miles traveled. c) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project includes the placement of an electronic billboard adjacent to U.S. 101. The proposed billboard will be oriented for viewing primarily from U.S. 101. The proposed billboard will comply with all applicable laws and regulations concerning brightness, including, without limitation, California Building and Professions Code Section 5403(g) and California Vehicle Code Section 21466.5. The billboard proposes to include different images, but each image will be displayed for at least eight seconds and the images would not move or present the appearance of motion and would not flash or blink or any other means that does not provide a constant illumination. These features associated with the proposed electronic billboard would not substantially increase hazards to drivers along U.S. 101 and less than significant impacts would occur. d) No Impact. The implementation of the proposed electronic billboard would not cause inadequate emergency access in the Project vicinity because the placement of the electronic sign does not include employees at the Project site. Therefore, the Project would not impact access.
1367
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 63 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
References
No references.
1368
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 64 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.16 Utilities and Energy
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project need new or expanded water
supply entitlements that are not anticipated in the
current Urban Water Management Plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Would the project require additional wastewater
conveyance or treatment capacity to serve project
demand and existing commitments?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Would the project generate solid waste that would
exceed the permitted capacity of a landfill serving the City?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Would the project conflict with federal, state, or local statutes or regulations related to solid waste?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Would the project involve wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy during project
construction, operation, maintenance, and/or
removal?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
f) Would the project require additional energy facilities, the provision of which may have a significant effect on the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
g) Would the project be inconsistent with existing energy standards?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
h) Would the project preempt future energy development
or future energy conservation, or inhibit the future use of renewable energy or energy storage?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
a) No Impact. The operational activities associated with the proposed electronic billboard would not require the use of water, and therefore, the Project would not require new or expanded water supply entitlements. Therefore, the Project would have no impact. b) No Impact. The proposed Project would not result in wastewater generation, and therefore, would not result in a need for wastewater treatment. As a result, the Project would not impact the capacity of the existing wastewater treatment facilities servicing the City of Oxnard.
c) No Impact. The proposed electronic billboard would not include any employees and would not generate solid waste. Temporary construction waste would be hauled off site in accordance with all Federal, State, and local regulations. The Project would not exceed current permitted capacities of landfills because the Project would not generate operational waste. As such, the proposed Project would have no long-term impact. d) No Impact. As discussed above, temporary construction waste would be generated during installation of the proposed billboard, trenching for the electrical line and removal of the existing landscaping along U.S. 101. However, the construction waste would be hauled off site in accordance with all Federal, State, and local regulations, and therefore, would not conflict with these regulations.
1369
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 65 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
e) Less than Significant Impact. As described below, the proposed Project would not involve wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy.

Construction
The Project would consume energy during construction activities, primarily from on- and off-road vehicle fuel consumption in the form of diesel and gasoline, necessary to install a typical billboard. Construction of a typical billboard is assumed to require up to four workdays, depending on the nature of the soil and the extent of the column footing required.

For the purposes of evaluating energy usage, the analysis conservatively assumes a construction scenario of four days of construction. The construction would consist of the following tasks: 1) drilling and haul of excavated soil, 2) column set and concrete pour, 3) building the structure and 4) installation of digital display. These activities would occur over a two-week period with a five to seven-day break between the drilling/column set and the installation to allow for concrete setting.

Energy consumption would occur from the operation of heavy-duty construction equipment, on-road trucks, and from on-road light-duty passenger vehicles from construction workers commuting to and from the Project site. Heavy-duty construction equipment was conservatively assumed to be primarily diesel-fueled. Diesel fuel would also be used for heavy-duty on-road trucks used for hauling of excavated soils, cement delivery, on-road transport of construction equipment and materials (i.e., aerial lift trucks, cranes, and billboard construction materials such as columns and electronic displays) Natural gas and electricity are not anticipated to be used during construction activitiesin any substantial quantities. A summary of the Project’s construction fuel usage is provided in Table UE-1, Summary of Fuel Consumption During Installation of the Proposed Electronic Billboard. Energy calculations for fuel consumption are based on the same assumptions used for the Air Quality analysis and used for the CalEEMod Emissions Modeling.

TABLE UE-1

SUMMARY OF FUEL CONSUMPTION DURING INSTALLATION OF THE

PROPOSED ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD
Activity Fuel Gallonsa
Off-Road Construction Equipment Diesel 203
Construction Haul Vehicles Diesel 117
Construction Worker Commuting Gasoline 14
a Fuel estimates are based on installation of the proposed electronic billboard in 2022.

SOURCE: ESA, 2022
As shown, the estimated total diesel fuel consumed by construction equipment and on-road haul/delivery trucks would be approximately 320 gallons for the installation of the proposed electronic billboard. Transportation fuel from workers traveling to and from the 1370
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 66 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
Project site would be limited and are estimated as less than 15 gallons of gasoline which is considered minimal fuel consumption.

Transportation fuels (gasoline and diesel) are produced from crude oil, which can be domestic or imported from various regions around the world. Based on current proven reserves, crude oil production would be sufficient to meet 50 years of worldwide consumption (BP Global, 2022). Vehicles that would be used by construction workers would comply with Corporate Average Fuel Economy fuel economy standards, which would result in more efficient use of transportation fuels (lower consumption). Vehicles that would be used by construction workers would also comply with Pavley and Low Carbon Fuel Standards which are designed to reduce vehicle GHG emissions, but would also result in fuel savings in addition to compliance with Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards.

Construction of the Project would utilize fuel-efficient equipment consistent with State and federal regulations, such as fuel efficiency regulations in accordance with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Pavley Phase II standards, the anti-idling regulation in accordance with Section 2485 in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, and fuel requirements in accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, and would comply with State measures to reduce the inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy, such as petroleum-based transportation fuels. While these regulations are intended to reduce construction emissions, compliance with the antiidling and emissions regulations discussed above would also result in fuel savings from the use of more fuel-efficient engines. Therefore, Project construction would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources and energy impacts would still be less than significant. Calculation details for fuel and energy consumption are included in Appendix G.

Operation
Operations of the proposed electronic billboard would consume energy in the form of purchased electricity to power the lighting. Electricity in the Project area (Ventura County) is provided by Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE is required to commit to the use of renewable energy sources for compliance with the Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS).

SCE has already met its requirement to procure at least 33 percent of its energy portfolio from renewable sources by 2020 with approximately 33.1 percent of its 2020 electric supply power mix from renewable power (SCE 2020). With the passage of SB 100 in September 2018, SCE will be required to update its long-term plans to demonstrate compliance including providing 60 percent of its energy portfolio from renewable sources by December 31, 2030, and ultimately planning for 100 percent eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources by December 31, 2045.

Predicted energy use for the proposed electronic billboard is estimated at an average of approximately 150 kilowatt hours (kWh) per day and approximately 54,000 kWh per year. 1371
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 67 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
Based on SCE’s 2020 Annual Report, SCE total system sales for 2020 was 85,399 million kWh of electricity (SCE 2021). As such, the Project-related net increase in annual electricity consumption of 54,000 kWh per year would represent less than 0.0001 percent of SCE’s total energy sales. The proposed electronic billboard would utilize energy efficient light emitting diode (LED) technology, which is recognized by the U.S.

Department of Energy as the most energy efficient lighting technology (U.S. DOE, n.d.).

Therefore, Project operations would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources and energy impacts would still be less than significant.

As discussed above, Project construction would utilize fuel-efficient equipment consistent with State and federal regulations, such as fuel efficiency regulations in accordance with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Pavley Phase II standards, the anti-idling regulation in accordance with Section 2485 in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, and fuel requirements in accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, to reduce the use of petroleum-based transportation fuels.

Operation of the Project would utilize energy efficient light emitting diode (LED) technology, which is recognized by the U.S. Department of Energy as the most energy efficient lighting technology (U.S. DOE, n.d.). As a result, the proposed Project would support Statewide efforts to implement fuel saving strategies and utilize energy efficient technologies. Overall, the Project would not be inconsistent with existing energy standards and impacts would be less than significant.
f) No Impact. Implementation of the proposed electronic billboard would include the extension of an electrical line for approximately 40 linear feet to an existing electrical facility located immediately adjacent to the Project site. The electronic billboard would not require additional energy facilities, beyond the proposed extension of an electrical line, to serve the proposed Project. Therefore, the Project would result in no impact. g) Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, Project construction would utilize fuel-efficient equipment consistent with State and federal regulations, such as fuel efficiency regulations in accordance with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Pavley Phase II standards, the anti-idling regulation in accordance with Section 2485 in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, and fuel requirements in accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, to reduce the use of petroleum-based transportation fuels. Operation of the Project would utilize energy efficient light emitting diode (LED) technology, which is recognized by the U.S.

Department of Energy as the most energy efficient lighting technology (U.S. DOE, nd.).

As a result, the proposed Project would support Statewide efforts to implement fuel saving strategies and utilize energy efficient technologies. Overall, the Project would not be inconsistent with existing energy standards and impacts would be less than significant. h) No Impact. The implementation of the proposed electronic billboard would not preempt energy development or future energy conservation, or inhibit the future use of renewable energy or energy storage due to the Project’s limited use of energy resources. 1372
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 68 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
References
BP Global. 2022. Oil reserves. Available at: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energyeconomics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/oil.html. Accessed February 2022.

Edison International. 2021. Edison International and Southern California Edison 2020 Annual Report, page 2. Available at:
https://www.edison.com/content/dam/eix/documents/investors/sec-filings-financials/2020- eix-sce-annual-report.pdf. Accessed February 2022.

Southern California Edison. 2020, 2020 Power Content Label, Southern California Edison.

U.S. Department of Energy. nd. LED Lighting. Available at:
https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/led-lighting. Accessed February 2022. 1373
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 69 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.17 Wildfire
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Discussion
a - d) Less than SignificantImpact. The proposed digital electronic billboard is located on a lot in an urban area of the City of Oxnard. Based on a review of the fire hazards severity zones prepared as part of the CalFire fire and resource assessment program, the Project site is not located within or near an area that is designated as a very high fire hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ). The nearest VHFHSZ designated in a Local Responsibility Area is approximately 4.5 miles to the northwest and within a State Responsibility Area is approximately 4.3 miles to the northeast. Due to the distance from a VHFHSZ, the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to wildfires.

References
CalFire. 2020. FHSZ Viewer. Available at: gis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed on March 2, 2022. 1374
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 70 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022

3.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
b) Would the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
c) Would the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Discussion
a) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The implementation of the Project would include installation activities for the proposed billboard and electrical line as well as removal of existing eucalyptus trees along U.S. 101 that could provide nesting opportunities for bird species. The installation activities and removal of the eucalyptus trees could result in significant impacts to nesting birds. The implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce these potential impacts to less than significant. In addition, construction activities for the Project could result in potential significant impacts to archaeological resources. The implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce these potential impacts to less than significant.
b) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The potential for cumulative impacts occur when the impacts of a project are combined with impacts from related development projects and result in impacts that are greater than the impacts of a project alone. The City of Oxnard currently includes an additional electronic billboard proposed at Ventura Road on the northside of U.S. 101. This related project is located approximately 4,600 feet west of the Project site. The City of Oxnard is also contemplating the adoption of an ordinance that would allow additional electronic billboards to be constructed and operate along U.S. 101; however, these billboards would not be allowed to be placed within 2,000 feet of an existing electronic billboard and would be required to be located at least 100 feet from an existing residence. As discussed in Sections 3.1 through 3.17 above, the proposed Project could result in potential significant impacts related to biological resources, cultural resources, and noise on wildlife species prior to the implementation of mitigation measures. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, CR-1, and CR-2, the potential impacts associated with the Project would be reduced to less than significant. Given that the potential related projects would need to occur at least 2,000 feet 1375
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 71 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
from the Projectsite and the Project impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, and noise on wildlife species are site specific and would not combine with potential impacts associated with other electronic billboards implemented along U.S. 101, the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts would be considered less than cumulatively considerable and less than significant.
c) Less than Significant Impact. The implementation of the proposed electronic billboard includes potential significant impacts to nesting birds and potential archeological and paleontological resources. The Project would result in less than significant direct or indirect impacts on human beings.

References
No references.
1376
Environmental Checklist
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 72 ESA / 202000387.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2022
This page intentionally left blank
1377
Appendix A
Project Plans
1378
1379
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Detail B
1 /411 1'-011
'
Detail C
1/4"= 1'-0"
N
EB
\
\
\
\
'
~
75'
[ 2 ] Bird's Eye Site Plan
LEGEND
D
ml
GROUND

LIGHT POLE

TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX

TREE LINE
0 le 1/
'
'
/
/
/
/
/
\
/
/
\
\
/
/
/
/
/
/
\
• . ·-- .

J/iJc
\
\
\
\
APN 132-0-311-075 .• ·

NO ACCESS
TO BE RE0 LANDSCAPED
.· .· ' ~
.... ·· /
/ '
\
\
\
, I ,
/
\
1 /16"
/
'
/
Detail A
1/411 1 '-011
\
1 '-011
\
APN 132-0-311-075
\
TO.E3E RE-LANDSCAPED
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
[ 1 ] Site Plan @Grade

NO ACCESS
I , ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .

I
I
I
I
I
·,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 /8" 1 '-011
'
ib+a
architecture
177 Post Street,
Suite 920
San Francisco,
CA 94108
tel: (415) 512-9660
fax: (415) 512-9663
www.ibadesign.com

PROJECT NAME
OXNARD

SIGNAGE

PROJECT
APN 132-0-311-075
Oxnard,
California
CLIENT

OUTFRONT
FOSTER

INTERSTATE

FOR SITE PERMIT ONLY

REV DATE ISSUE

SHEET DESCRIPTION

SITE PLAN
SHEET NOTES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_J DATE 8/6/2020

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES, COMPLETE WITH ALL STATE AND CITY

AMENDMENTS AND ORDINANCES WHEREIN THE SPECIFIED DO NOT EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAWS OR ORDINANCES. THE LAWS OR ORDINANCES SHALL GOVERN. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ALL CONFLICTS.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION AND COORDINATION WITH SUB-CONTRACTORS TO ENSURE THEIR WORK IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

THE WORK, INFORMATION, DESIGNS, CONCEPTS AND IDEAS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE SITE AND PROJECT SPECIFIC, AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED FOR THIS ONE PROJECT ONLY. NO WARRANTY IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH THESE DRAWINGS WERE CREATED AND INTENDED.

CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE AND PAY FOR ALL BUILDING PERMITS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.

CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SCHEDULE SHOWING TIME LINES TO COMPLETE ALL WORK AND INCLUDING A DATE FOR FINAL COMPLETION.

UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO OWNER A SET OF REPRODUCIBLE "AS-BUILT' DRAWINGS.

CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE AND SAFETY PRECAUTIONS ARE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.

ALL FIRES AND ACCIDENTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO OWNER, BUILDING MANAGEMENT, AND ARCHITECT AND SHALL BE DISCUSSED AT PROJECT MEETING.

UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF WORK, CONTRACTOR ALONG WITH ARCHITECT AND OWNER SHALL PREPARE A PUNCH LIST TO INCLUDE ALL INCOMPLETE AND/OR CORRECTIVE WORK AND SCHEDULE TO COMPLETE SAID WORK.

10. 11 .

12. 13.

14. 15.

CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, CALCULATIONS, TITLE 24 ENERGY DOCUMENTATION

AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW AND RETROFIT OF EXISTING POWER, SIGNAL, LIGHTING, ALARM, AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS.

CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT ENGINEERING DRAWINGS TO THE CITY OF OXNARD BUILDING AUTHORITIES AND OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED BUILDING PERMITS.

CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, CALCULATIONS, TITLE 24 ENERGY DOCUMENTATION, AND CUT SHEETS OF ALL EQUIPMENT, LIGHTING, SWITCHES, COVER PLACES, ETC. TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW BY ARCHITECT AND OWNER.

CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK REQUIREMENTS OF DESIGN-BUILD SUBCONTRACTORS.

CONSTRUCTION HOURS AND WORK IN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE LIMITED. SEE LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS.

ANY HIDDEN CONDITIONS THAT REQUIRE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT

ISSUED FOR THESE PLANS MAY REQUIRE FURTHER CITY APPROVALS INCLUDING REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE BUILDING OWNER, PROJECT DESIGNER, AND/OR CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A REVISION TO THE

CITY FOR ANY WORK NOT GRAPHICALLY ILLUSTRATED ON THE JOB COPY OF THE PLANS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, WHEN APPLICABLE, PLANS AND ENGINEERING WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR SHORING AS REQUIRED BY 2016 CBC, CHAPTER 31 REGARDING THE PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED BY OSHA. THE FOLLOWING WILL BE ADDRESSED:

WALLS OF EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE PROPERLY SHORED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. WHERE TEMPORARY

SHORING IS NEEDED A COMPETENT CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONSULTED FOR RECOMMENDATIONS AND DESIGN OF THE SHORING SCHEME FOR THE EXCAVATION. THE RECOMMENDED DESIGN AND TYPE OF SHORING SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO USAGE.

16. 17.

18. 19.

20. 21.

ALL APPROPRIATE GUIDELINES OF OSHA SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE SHORING DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. WHERE SPACE PERMITS, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SLOPES MAY BE UTILIZED IN LIEU OF SHORING. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE VERTICAL CUT FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT WILL BE FIVE (5) FEET. BEYOND THAT HORIZONTAL BENCHES OF 5 FEET WIDE WILL BE REQUIRED. TEMPORARY SHORES SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 TO 1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL). IN SOME AREAS DUE TO HIGH MOISTURE CONTENT/ WATER TABLE, FLATTER SLOPES MAY BE REQUIRED IF SO RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER IN THE FIELD.

IF SHORING IS REQUIRED, THE PLANS WILL SPECIFY THE LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL THAT HAS SOLE RESPONSIBILITY TO DESIGN AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHORING, BRACING, FORMWORK, ETC. AS REQUIRED FOR THE PROTECTION OF LIFE AND PROPERTY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SIGN.

SHORING PLANS SHALL BE WET-STAMPED AND SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER-OF-RECORD AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE SURCHARGE LOADS FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES THAT ARE WITHIN THE ZONE OF INFLUENCE (45 DEGREE WEDGE UP THE SLOPE FROM THE BASE OF THE EXCAVATION) AND/ OR DRIVEWAY SURCHARGE LOADS.

AN OSHA PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINED IF NEEDED PER CAL/ OSHA REQUIREMENTS. SEE THE CAL/ OSHA HANDBOOK AT: HTTP://WWW.CA-OSHA.COM/PDFPUBS/OSHA USERGUIDE.PDF • CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS: CHAPTER 4, SUBCHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 1541.1.

A GRADING PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IF REQUIRED.

PLANS SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING CODE PLAN CHECK WILL INCLUDE A COMPLETE UNDERGROUND PLUMBING PLAN

INCLUDING DETAILS FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL REQUIRED OIL INTERCEPTORS AND CITY-REQUIRED BACKWATER PREVENTION DEVICES.

SCALE 1/16" = 1 '-0"

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
JOB NO. 1814
A-1.0
SHEET NO.

All drawings and written material appearing
herein constitute the original and unpublished
work of the designer and the same may not be
duplicated, used, or disclosed without the
written consent of the designer.
© ianbirchall&associate 2020
1380
36"0--------
48"0 -\/~ ~
60"0
3"
(0 0
I I
v v
,..... ,.....
-(")
LO
I
0 ,.....
@] Face Elevation
20'-4"
(rJ Logo Cabinet Plan
~------
48'-6"

ALUMINUM GRATING

CATWALK
,..:IN
(0
I -,.....

STEEL LADDER
48'-0" 3"

SECONDARY FRAMING

FOR LED SIGN
~,,__:STEEL LADDER
SCALE-3/16": 1'0" 3 Loao Cabinet Elevation
---PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL
20'-4"

PRIMARY STEEL TRUSS
STRUCTURE-PNT. BLACK
ALV. STEEL LADDER
SCALE - 3/16" : 1 '0"
-(0
I
SCALE - 3/16" : 1 '0"
...J
...J
~ UJ
>
0 -
0 -
0 (0
. Cf)
1-
z
-
0 0
LO
STRUCTURAL FRAMIN1~~
-SSD. PAINT BLACK
~ 0

STEEL LADDER
L_ ____________________ ~ STEEL LADDER
[ 2 ] Plan View SCALE -1/8": 1'0"
1 -(0
I
LO
v
•
'i'
ro
~
9 ro
a-+----- ,
48'-6"
INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED L__ __

LOGO CABINET
"---------- 1 O" DIA.
"---------- 36" DIA.
~------ 48" DIA.
~-----,-------STRUCTURAL STEEL TUBES
~------60" DIA.

I, 7'-0"0 I,
1 1
NOTE: ALL STRUCTURAL

NOTES TO BE VERIFIED BY

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
~-36-#10 BARS

EQUALLY SPACED
~-18-#10 BARS

EQUALLY SPACED
#4 TIES AT 10" O.C.
~-AL TERNA TE #4 SPIRAL
Overall Elevation SCALE -1/8": 1'0"
(See A-3.0 For Color Scheme)
ib+a
architecture
177 Post Street,
Suite 920
San Francisco,
CA94108
tel: (415) 512-9660
fax: (415) 512-9663
www.ibadesign.com

PROJECT NAME
OXNARD

SIGNAGE

PROJECT
APN 132-0-311-075
Oxnard,
California
CLIENT

OUTFRONT
FOSTER

INTERSTATE

FOR SITE PERMIT ONLY

REV DATE ISSUE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
SIGN

ELEVATIONS

AND PLAN
DATE 8/6/2020
SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
JOB NO. 1814
A-2.0
SHEET NO.

All drawings and written material appearing
herein constitute the original and unpublished
work of the designer and the same may not be
duplicated, used, or disclosed without the
written consent of the designer.
© ianbirchall&associate 2020
1381
2 3
3 (5)-_E_le_v_a_t_io_n_A ______ s_c_AL_E_-_118_"_:1_·0" 4 B
[ 6 ] Plan View
LEGEND
(i) LED SIGN FACE
@ INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED ANODIZED ALUMINUM LOGO CABINET @ STEEL TUBE PAINTED GRAY (MATTHEW PAINT TO MATCH PANTONE PMS877C -SATIN) 0 STEEL TRUSS PAINTED BLACK (MATTHEW PAINT - MP59647 BLACK IS BACK- SATIN) @ ALUMINUM GRATING PLATFORM (NATURAL ANODIZED)
@ STEEL TUBE PAINTED BLACK (MATTHEW PAINT- MP59647 BLACK IS BACK- SATIN) 0 PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL (MATTHEW PAINT TO MATCH PANTONE PMS877C - SATIN) 2 3
[ 4 ] Elevation B SCALE - 1 /8" : 1 '0" [ 3] Elevation C SCALE - 1/8": 1'0" (2) __ P_er_s~pe_c_ti_ve_V_ie_w_2 __________ N_T_S_ 0 C 20'-4" I
,.-
6 SCALE - 1 /8" : 1 '0" (7] __ Lo~g_o_C_a_b_in_e_t_C_lo_s_e-_u_p _________ _ (1) __ P_er_s~pe_c_ti_ve_V_ie_w_1 __________ N_T_S_

SHEET NOTES

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES, COMPLETE WITH ALL STATE AND CITY

AMENDMENTS AND ORDINANCES WHEREIN THE SPECIFIED DO NOT EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAWS OR ORDINANCES. THE LAWS OR ORDINANCES SHALL GOVERN. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ALL CONFLICTS.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION AND COORDINATION WITH SUB-CONTRACTORS TO ENSURE THEIR WORK IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

THE WORK, INFORMATION, DESIGNS, CONCEPTS AND IDEAS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE SITE AND PROJECT SPECIFIC, AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED FOR THIS ONE PROJECT ONLY. NO WARRANTY IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH THESE DRAWINGS WERE CREATED AND INTENDED.

CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE AND PAY FOR ALL BUILDING PERMITS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.

CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SCHEDULE SHOWING TIME LINES TO COMPLETE ALL WORK AND INCLUDING A DATE FOR FINAL COMPLETION.

UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO OWNER A SET OF REPRODUCIBLE "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS.

CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE AND SAFETY PRECAUTIONS ARE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.

ALL FIRES AND ACCIDENTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO OWNER, BUILDING MANAGEMENT, AND ARCHITECT AND SHALL BE DISCUSSED AT PROJECT MEETING.

UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF WORK, CONTRACTOR ALONG WITH ARCHITECT AND OWNER SHALL PREPARE A PUNCH LIST TO INCLUDE ALL INCOMPLETE AND/OR CORRECTIVE WORK AND SCHEDULE TO COMPLETE SAID WORK.

10. 11.

12. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, CALCULATIONS, TITLE 24 ENERGY DOCUMENTATION

AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW AND RETROFIT OF EXISTING POWER, SIGNAL, LIGHTING, ALARM, AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS.

CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT ENGINEERING DRAWINGS TO THE CITY OF OXNARD BUILDING AUTHORITIES AND OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED BUILDING PERMITS.

CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, CALCULATIONS, TITLE 24 ENERGY DOCUMENTATION, AND CUT SHEETS OF ALL EQUIPMENT, LIGHTING, SWITCHES, COVER PLACES, ETC. TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW BY ARCHITECT AND OWNER.

13. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK REQUIREMENTS OF DESIGN-BUILD SUBCONTRACTORS.

14. 15.

CONSTRUCTION HOURS AND WORK IN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE LIMITED. SEE LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS.

ANY HIDDEN CONDITIONS THAT REQUIRE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT

ISSUED FOR THESE PLANS MAY REQUIRE FURTHER CITY APPROVALS INCLUDING REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE BUILDING OWNER, PROJECT DESIGNER, AND/OR CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A REVISION TO THE

CITY FOR ANY WORK NOT GRAPHICALLY ILLUSTRATED ON THE JOB COPY OF THE PLANS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, WHEN APPLICABLE, PLANS AND ENGINEERING WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR SHORING AS REQUIRED BY 2016 CBC, CHAPTER 31 REGARDING THE PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED BY OSHA. THE FOLLOWING WILL BE ADDRESSED:

WALLS OF EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE PROPERLY SHORED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. WHERE TEMPORARY

SHORING IS NEEDED A COMPETENT CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONSUL TED FOR RECOMMENDATIONS AND DESIGN OF THE SHORING SCHEME FOR THE EXCAVATION. THE RECOMMENDED DESIGN AND TYPE OF SHORING SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO USAGE.

16. 17,

18. 19.

20. 21.

ALL APPROPRIATE GUIDELINES OF OSHA SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE SHORING DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. WHERE SPACE PERMITS, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SLOPES MAY BE UTILIZED IN LIEU OF SHORING. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE VERTICAL CUT FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT WILL BE FIVE (5) FEET. BEYOND THAT HORIZONTAL BENCHES OF 5 FEET WIDE WILL BE REQUIRED. TEMPORARY SHORES SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 TO 1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL). IN SOME AREAS DUE TO HIGH MOISTURE CONTENT/ WATER TABLE, FLATTER SLOPES MAY BE REQUIRED IF SO RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER IN THE FIELD.

IF SHORING IS REQUIRED, THE PLANS WILL SPECIFY THE LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL THAT HAS SOLE RESPONSIBILITY TO DESIGN AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHORING, BRACING, FORMWORK, ETC. AS REQUIRED FOR THE PROTECTION OF LIFE AND PROPERTY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SIGN.

SHORING PLANS SHALL BE WET-STAMPED AND SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER-OF-RECORD AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE SURCHARGE LOADS FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURES THAT ARE WITHIN THE ZONE OF INFLUENCE (45 DEGREE WEDGE UP THE SLOPE FROM THE BASE OF THE EXCAVATION) AND/ OR DRIVEWAY SURCHARGE LOADS.

AN OSHA PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINED IF NEEDED PER CAL/ OSHA REQUIREMENTS. SEE THE CAL/ OSHA HANDBOOK AT: HTTP://WWW.CA-OSHA.COM/PDFPUBS/OSHA USERGUIDE.PDF • CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS : CHAPTER 4, SUBCHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 1541.1.

A GRADING PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IF REQUIRED.

PLANS SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING CODE PLAN CHECK WILL INCLUDE A COMPLETE UNDERGROUND PLUMBING PLAN

INCLUDING DETAILS FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL REQUIRED OIL INTERCEPTORS AND CITY-REQUIRED BACKWATER PREVENTION DEVICES.
ib+a
architecture
177 Post Street,
Suite 920
San Francisco,
CA94108
tel: (415) 512-9660
fax: (415) 512-9663
www.ibadesign.com

PROJECT NAME
OXNARD

SIGNAGE

PROJECT
APN 132-0-311-075
Oxnard,
California
CLIENT

OUTFRONT
FOSTER

INTERSTATE

FOR SITE PERMIT ONLY

REV DATE ISSUE

SHEET DESCRIPTION

COLORED

ELEVATIONS
DATE 8/6/2020
SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
JOB NO. 1814
A-3.0
SHEET NO.

All drawings and written material appearing
herein constitute the original and unpublished
work of the designer and the same may not be
duplicated, used, or disclosed without the
written consent of the designer.
© ianbirchall&associate 2020
1382
[ 2 ) View From Northbound On U.S.101
•
•
- --
[ 1 ) View From Southbound On U.S.101
ib+a
architecture
177 Post Street,
Suite 920
San Francisco,
CA 94108
tel: (415) 512-9660
fax: (415) 512-9663
www.ibadesign.com

PROJECT NAME
OXNARD

SIGNAGE

PROJECT
APN 132-0-311-075
CLIENT
Oxnard,
California

OUTFRONT
FOSTER

INTERSTATE

FOR SITE PERMIT ONLY

REV DATE ISSUE

SHEET DESCRIPTION

RENDERINGS
DATE 8/6/2020
SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
JOB NO. 1814
A-4.0
SHEET NO.

All drawings and written material appearing
herein constitute the original and unpublished
work of the designer and the same may not be
duplicated, used, or disclosed without the
written consent of the designer.
© ianbirchall&associate 2020
1383
Working Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only. *Please note, design, placement of structures and elevation details are preliminary and subject to change.

The positioning of each sign in this rendering and the perspective of each sign vis-a-vis the overall view is for illustration purposes only and is not exact. 2 14’h x 48’w, Double-Sided Digital “V” Display
Site 2: View from North-West End of 210 Riverpark Blvd
Photo View Map
Islamic Center of
Ventura County
'
1384
Working Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only. *Please note, design, placement of structures and elevation details are preliminary and subject to change.

The positioning of each sign in this rendering and the perspective of each sign vis-a-vis the overall view is for illustration purposes only and is not exact. 3 14’h x 48’w, Double-Sided Digital “V” Display
Site 2: View from South-East End of 210 Riverpark Blvd
Photo View Map
Islamic Center of
Ventura County
'
1385
Appendix B
Proposed RiverPark Specific
Plan Amendment Text
Revisions
1386
1387
OTAD-57005\2367425.1

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CITY OF OXNARD

RIVERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN
KEY: Blue Text = Proposed Additions
Red Strikethrough = Proposed Deletions
3 COMMERCIAL MASTER PLAN
SECTION 3.5 BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS
Section 3.5.2 Standards for Each Building Type
▪ Type 1-C-A: Large Multistory Anchor
▪ Type 1-C-B: Large Pad Retail
▪ Type 1-C-C: Multistory Mini Anchor
▪ Type 1-C-D: Inline Retail
▪ Type 1-C-E: Inline Retail With Upper Story Office/Housing ▪ Type 1-C-F: Pad Restaurant/Retail
▪ Type 1-C-G: Drive Thru Commercial
▪ Type 2-C-A: Food and Wine Multistory
▪ Type 2-C-B: Food and Wine Demo Factory/Outlet Store
▪ Type 2-C-C: Food and Wine Pavilion/Office Building
▪ Type 3-C: Office Building
▪ Type 4-C: Hotel With Retail
▪ Type 5-C: Stand Alone Kiosk
▪ Type 6-C: Outparcel Commercial
▪ Type 7-C: Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards [. . .]
TYPE 7-C: Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards
The following standards apply to lots for Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards. If the lot contains other building types, the lot must comply with the minimum lot dimension standards required for that building type pursuant to this section, unless otherwise modified. Additional standards pertaining to Freeway Electronic Billboards can be found in Section 5.9 (Signage Standards) and the Oxnard City Code.

LOT DIMENSIONS
Lot Area Min: 1,000 SF Max: 15,000 SF
Lot Width Min: 10’ Max: 300’
Lot Depth Min: 40’ Max: 100’

SIZE AND SPACING
Billboard Face Display For allowable face size refer to the Oxnard City Code Sign Height For allowable sign height refer to the Oxnard City Code 1388
OTAD-57005\2367425.1
Setbacks Min: 0’ (Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards only) Spacing For minimum spacing requirements refer to the Oxnard City Code 5 LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN

5.5 EDGES AND BUFFERS STANDARDS

5.5.2 Design Concept for Edges and Buffers

5.5.2.1 The Ventura Freeway Frontage
Landscaping of RiverPark’s frontage with the Ventura freeway at Planning Districts D, B and E shall be provided in a landscaped buffer zone. Landscaping in this area shall meet the requirements at two distinct scales: the scale of the freeway, and that of slower moving vehicles and pedestrians within RiverPark. Landscaping perceptible from the Ventura freeway will consist of a single row of 30-foot tall Mexican Fan Palms (at 30 feet O.C.) along the freeway frontage. These palms will clearly differentiate and identify RiverPark not only from the freeway but from the southern approach from Oxnard. For slower-moving vehicles and pedestrians, the zone will also be planted with an appropriate mix of native and indigenous grasses, perennials, shrubs, and trees. See Exhibit 5.AA for a typical cross-section. Alternative landscaping may be approved, under a Special Use Permit.

5.9 SIGNAGE STANDARDS
[. . .]

5.9.3.11 Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards
Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards, as defined in the Oxnard City Code (OCC) shall be allowed in Planning Districts A and E, subject solely to the applicable regulations and procedures of OCC Chapter 9 Article IX. Advertising Signs.
1389
Appendix C
Native American Assembly Bill
52 Notification
1390
1391

CITY OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

PLANNING DIVISION OXNARD
214 SOUTH C STREET
OXNARD, CALIFORNIA 93030
(805)385-7858
Fax (805) 385-7417
November 23, 2021
Julie Tumamait-Stenslie, Chairperson
Barbarefio/Venturefio Band of Mission Indians
365 North Poli Avenue
Ojai, California 93023
..., --.::..::: ~
~
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52 (Gatto, 2014).

Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation Opportunity, pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).

Dear Chair Tuma ma it-Stenslie
The City of Oxnard has determined that a project application is complete for the Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard Project.

Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC§ 21080.3.1 (d).

The project is a request for a Special Use Permit (PZ 20-500-07), Specific Plan Amendment (PZ 20-630-02), and Development Agreement (PZ 20-670-06) for the construction of a new double sided digital freeway oriented electronic billboard on the North of Hwy 101, South of Riverpark Blvd, and West of N. Vineyard Road. The property is currently a vacant City owned property. The project will require re-landscaping along the Cal-Trans Right-of-Way. The re-landscaping will require the removal of approximately 10 trees and the replanting of native trees and shrubs. The project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Oxnard is the lead agency under CEQA.

The project is located North of Hwy 101, South of Riverpark Blvd, and West of N. Vineyard Road (APN:
132-0-311-075).

The proposed project must comply with California Public Resources Code§ 21080.3.1 (Assembly Bill [AB] 52 of 2014), which requires local governments to conduct meaningful consultation with California Native American tribes that have requested to be notified by CEQA lead agencies of proposed projects in the geographic area with which the tribe is traditionally and culturally affiliated.

Your tribe's input is important to the City's planning process. We request that you advise us as early as possible if you wish to consult on the proposed project. Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30

CALIFORNIA ---
1392
days from the receipt of this letter to request consultation, in writing, with the City of Oxnard. If you require any additional information or have any questions, please contact me 805-385-8272 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Thank you for your assistance.

VJ~~
Joe Pearson II, AICP I Senior Planner
Community Development Department
City of Oxnard
Enclosed: Project Location Map and Site Plan
1393
TERRAIN COLOR CODE:

ASPHALT
D OONCRETl'
GROUND

DIGITAL BILLBOARD DETAIL

PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1" = 10'
SffTE 2
\
\
\
NOTE:

1. BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON FOUND MONUMENTS PER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS FIELD BOOKS, TRACT NO. 5852·1, 150 MR 76, AND CALIFORNIA R/W MAP NO.

F 2232·5 07-VEN-101·22.2.

2. LANDSCAPING AND LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION DEVICES MAY EXIST WffiHN TI-IE PROPERTY AND ARE NOT SHOWN.

3. TREE LINE CANOPIES ARE PICTORIAL, AND MAY NOT REFLECT TRUE DRJP LINES. ◄. ROAD STRIPING IS PICTORIAL AND REPRESENTS ONLY APPROXIMATE, RELATIVE

LOCATIONS

5. DIGITAL BILl.BOARD ANO PROPOSED LOCATION PROVIDED BY QJENT.

6. IF RETAINING WAl..15 OR SIMILAR STRUCTURES ARE TO BE DESIGNED FROM TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON, THE ELEVATIONS OF CRITICAL POINTS CONTROWNG TI-!E DESIGN MUST BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF FINAL DESIGN.

7. n-ns MAP WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TTTlE REPORT. EXISTING EASEMENTS {IF ANY) ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON.

8. AffiNTION: IF THIS MAP IS PROVIDED IN AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT (IE: CAD) AS A

COURTESY TO A CLIENT, TH E DBJVERY OF TI-IE ELECTRONIC FILE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE DELJVERY OF OUR PROFESSIONAL WORK PRODUCT. ONLY THE SURVEYOR'S SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER PRINT OR PDF FORMATTED DRAWING CONST!TlJTES OUR PROFESSIONAL WORK PRODUCT. IN THE EVENT THAT THE ELECTRONIC ALE IS Al 1ERED, THE SURVEYOR'S SIGNED AND SEALED PRINT OR PDF FORMAmD DRAWING MUST BE REFERRED TO FOR THE ORIGINAL AND CORRECT SURVEY INFORMATION. OiRIS NB.SON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., SHAf..l NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY MODIACATION MADE TO

THE PROVIDED CAD ALE, OR FOR ANY PRODUCTS THAT HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM THE CAD ALE, WHICH ARE NOT REVIEWED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY US.

BENCH MARK: 8.M. NO. 110-8 VCYID 494 NAVO 1988 COUNTY OFVENTI.JRA DATUM

AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND MYRTLE STREET.

ELEVATION = 87.3196 FEET (26.615 METERS) (VENTURA COUNTY ADJ PUB 1989) LEGEND:
--- QJRB
--- V-GVITTR
~ - PAVEDROAD
"""'"""' WALL
--- TREEUNE

MAJOR INDEX CDNTOUR
MINOR INDEX C.ONTOUR

OOUNDARY LINE
LOTUNE
--- RIGHT-Of-WAYUNE - - - CBITERUNE
b UGHTPOl.f

CD TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX

STREET SIGN
G) SEWER IWlHOL.f
8 WATERVAJ.VE £ PROPOSEDBIWlOAAD
20· 10· o· 10' 20·
~ I
12/6 19

GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALL 1"=20'

REVISION NOTES

DESCRIPTION

CHANGED OVERALL AESTHETICS
40'
I
BY
OD
~
0 w
er:
if.
w
er:
a.
;;_
0 LL
0 w
er:
<(
a.
w
er:
a.
~ ~
t;; u
f6 ~
~~ .... ~
f6 L(j
i-::: ~
~ u::.
~ Q..
:::....~C'-J
bJJ •
:s s: ~
§§ ~~ V) ~
'-' ~ ;.1: ~~~
~ ~ r-!_ ~ .... c:i
(j ~ ~ a lJ... ~ Cl QN
a ~ C'-J i-:: a LJ...
~
~ Cl..
"' c;::
-, " t~
~~ :,...' i3 ~ ' Cl~
ti~
~ ti -,
-,
-,
-,
~
:s:
~
~
~ 8
Cl'
Q:
~
~
~
6 JOB NO. 19-5125
SCALE: 1" = 20'
DATE: OCT. 2019
DRAFTED: SJN
SHEET NO.
1 OF 1 SHEET
1394
1395
Appendix D
Photometric Analysis
1396
1397
330 N. Brand Blvd. Suite 950
Glendale, CA 91203
818.539.1111 • www.exp.com
City of Oxnard
Ventura County
Site # 2
Digital Billboards
Photometric Analysis
Project Number
2020239.00
Prepared By:

Michael Schrupp
Date Submitted
23 October, 2020

1398
City of Oxnard, Ventura County
Digital Billboards Photometric Analysis
exp Project No. 2020239.00
23, October 2020
ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 NARRATIVE .................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 APPENDIX - FOOT-CANDLE LEVEL GRAPHIC SHEETS ........................................................... 3 1399
City of Oxnard, Ventura County
Digital Billboard Photometric Analysis
exp Project # 2020239.00
23, October 2020
330 N. Brand Blvd. #1290, Glendale, CA, 91203, USA
T: +1.818.539.1111  www.exp.com/lightingdesign
1 1.0 NARRATIVE
We (exp engineering) have conducted a photometric review of the digital billboards being proposed by Outfront Foster Interstate to be located on Riverpark Blvd near the 101 freeway at Vineyard Ave, in Oxnard, CA.

Using the photometric software AGI32, we studied the screen’s output brightness to determine a) what if any modifications to the sign would be needed to comply with the OAAA (Outdoor Advertising Association of America) lighting level standards, and b) What impact will the sign have at night on the surrounding community.

The photometry is based on the specified Nichia series 336 LED modules, which output light horizontally at 90° and 45° vertically.

The proposed billboard is to be 14’x48’ with the top of the sign mounted at +60’ above the ground with maximum screen brightness of 300 NITS (300 Candela per Square Meter) in the evening.

Per OAAA guidelines, the proposed sign, displaying a full white image (for maximum brightness) should not exceed .3 footcandles over the surrounding ambient light levels at a distance of 250’ in any direction.

As we are unable to determine what the ambient light levels will be at the location, the studies were done assuming the worst-case scenario of no ambient light.

We have included graphical illustrations demonstrating the light levels in footcandles (fc) we expect from the screen.

Sheet 1 of the attachment is a location plan indicating the 250’ boundary overlaid on a map of the proposed site, as well as the projected relative angle of light emanating from the sign Sheet 2 shows the photometric calculations at the ground over the entire map area, graphicly shown as both footcandle points and as a pseudocolor graph.

Sheet 3 is a graphic representation of the light levels impacting the area to the north of the NE-facing sign.

Sheet 4 is a graphic representation of the light levels impacting the adjacent residential area to the east of the signs.

Sheet 5 is a graphic representation of the light levels impacting the retail areas and HW101 on-ramp to the south-east of the signs.
1400
City of Oxnard, Ventura County
Digital Billboard Photometric Analysis
exp Project # 2020239.00
23, October 2020
330 N. Brand Blvd. #1290, Glendale, CA, 91203, USA
T: +1.818.539.1111  www.exp.com/lightingdesign
2 Conclusions
We see no light levels in excess of .3fc beyond the 250’ radius of the signs, nor do we find any significant impact to the neighboring properties provided the sign brightness is reduced after dark to the 300 NIT level.

This report, prepared by exp Services Inc., is intended for the exclusive use of the City of Oxnard, Ventura County, and Outfront Foster Interstate Media. Neither exp Services Inc., City of Oxnard, Ventura County, or Outfront Foster Interstate Media assume any liability for the use of this report, or for the use of any information disclosed in the report, or for damages resulting from the use of this report, by other parties. .

1401
City of Oxnard, Ventura County
Digital Billboard Photometric Analysis
exp Project # 2020239.00
23, October 2020
330 N. Brand Blvd. #1290, Glendale, CA, 91203, USA
T: +1.818.539.1111  www.exp.com/lightingdesign
3 Appendix
Foot-candle Level Graphic Sheets
1402
Riverpark Blvd.

Revision: 0
Release: 10/23/2020
1 of 5
Outfront Foster Interstate
OXNARD BILLBOARD SITE 2
330 N. Brand Blvd. Suite
950
Overall Plan w/250’ Boundary
.:,. df:

X
p
1403
Riverpark Blvd.

Release: 10/23/2020
2 of 5 Revision: 0
Outfront Foster Interstate
OXNARD BILLBOARD SITE 2
330 N. Brand Blvd. Suite
950
Overall Photometry
w/250’ Boundary
1404
Riverpark Blvd.

Release: 10/23/2020
3 of 5 Revision: 0
Outfront Foster Interstate
OXNARD BILLBOARD SITE 2
330 N. Brand Blvd. Suite
950
Impact on Paseo Santa Clara
Apartments
1405
Riverpark Blvd.

Release: 10/23/2020
4 of 5 Revision: 0
Outfront Foster Interstate
OXNARD BILLBOARD SITE 2
330 N. Brand Blvd. Suite
950
Impact on Neighborhood to
the East
1406
Riverpark Blvd.

Release: 10/23/2020
5 of 5 Revision: 0
Outfront Foster Interstate
OXNARD BILLBOARD SITE 2
330 N. Brand Blvd. Suite
950
Impact looking SE toward 101
onramp and retail building
1407
Appendix E
Air Quality Assumptions and
Modeling
1408
1409
Location: Oxnard, Ventura County CA
CEC Forecasting Climate Zone: 8
Utility: SCE
Construction Schedule
Phase Start Date Completion Date Work Days Notes Total Haul Trucks - round trip Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt 6/6/2022 6/7/2022 1 1 flat-bed truck 5 super 10 dump 6
Column Set / Concrete Pour 6/6/2022 6/7/2022 1
4 concrete mixing trucks
90 ton crane
hireach crane truck
6 Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure 6/8/2022 6/8/2022 1 2 48ft flatbed trailer
275 ton crane
hireach crane truck
4 Build & Set Digital Displays 6/9/2022 6/9/2022 1
2 48ft flatbed trailer
90 ton crane
hireach crane truck
4 Construction Trips
Phase # Workers/Day 1
# Worker Trips/Day (oneway)2
# Vendor
Trips/Day (oneway) # Haul Truck Trips Total
Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt 4 8 0 12
Column Set / Concrete Pour 5 10 0 12
Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure 5 10 0 8
Build & Set Digital Displays 5 10 0 8
Air Quality Assumptions and Modeling
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard MND
1410
Construction By SubPhase
Phase Equipment Type # Engine hp Hrs/day
Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt
Excavators 1 188 8
Skid Steer Loaders 1 405 8
Off-Highway Truck 1 75 2
Column Set / Concrete Pour
Aerial Lift 1 63 8
Crane 1 231 8
Concrete Mixer* 1 80 4
Concrete Pump 1 84 4
Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure
Aerial Lift 1 63 8
Crane 1 231 8
Air Compressor 1 78 8
Build & Set Digital Displays
Aerial Lift 1 63 8
Crane 2 231 8
All Equipment specified as part of typical construction equipment phasing for projects CalEEmod default horsepower and load defaults typical of construction equipment with exception noted below. *Concrete Mixer included to include Hydraulic pump for truck mounted mixer utilizing Power Take-Off mode of concrete trucks during unloading/delivery (1 hr per truck) 1411
On + Off-Site Construction ROG NOX CO SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total
PM2.5 CO2e
Max Daily Emissions 0.741 8.060 6.143 0.019 0.482 0.304 0.655 0.097 0.289 0.349 1939.197 Off-Road Const. Eqpt ROG NOX CO SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total
PM2.5 CO2e
Drill Footing 0.404 3.709 5.482 0.011 0.207 0.157 0.364 0.022 0.144 0.167 1028 Column Set 0.585 6.229 4.852 0.011 - 0.262 0.262 - 0.247 0.247 1039 Build & Set Structure 0.682 6.623 5.404 0.011 - 0.293 0.293 - 0.278 0.278 1103 Build & Set Displays 0.409 4.745 2.986 0.007 - 0.184 0.184 - 0.169 0.169 727 total offroad 2.080 21.305 18.725 0.040 0.207 0.896 1.103 0.022 0.839 0.862 3898.0 On-Road Mobile ROG NOX CO SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total
PM2.5 CO2e
Drill Footing 0.067 1.827 0.661 0.008 0.275 0.016 0.291 0.075 0.015 0.090 885 Column Set 0.074 1.831 0.717 0.008 0.292 0.016 0.307 0.079 0.015 0.094 900 Build & Set Structure 0.059 1.227 0.570 0.005 0.222 0.011 0.233 0.060 0.010 0.070 625 Build & Set Displays 0.059 1.227 0.570 0.005 0.222 0.011 0.233 0.060 0.010 0.070 625 total on-road 0.259 6.113 2.519 0.027 1.010 0.053 1.063 0.274 0.051 0.325 3034.5 Total Construction ROG NOX CO SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total
PM2.5 CO2e
Drill Footing 0.471 5.5 6.1 0.018 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.3 1913.6 Column Set 0.659 8.1 5.6 0.019 0.292 0.278 0.569 0.079 0.262 0.342 1939 Build & Set Structure 0.741 7.8 6.0 0.017 0.222 0.304 0.526 0.060 0.289 0.349 1728 Build & Set Displays 0.468 6.0 3.6 0.013 0.222 0.195 0.417 0.060 0.180 0.240 1352 Project Total (lbs) 2.339 27.418 21.244 0.067 1.217 0.949 2.166 0.296 0.890 1.186 6933 (lb/day)
Maximum Daily Construction Emissions
Phase Emissions (lbs)
1412
Land Use - Default Lot size of 11,000 sq ft (Range: 1,000 - 15,000) Sq Ft = 1 is a unity rate for 1 Billboard for Operational Energy Construction Phase - From Buildboard Installation Schedule 1 Day for each phase. (5-7 days between Column Set and Build) CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Grading - Fugitive dust emissions
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Off-road Equipment - Typical Construction Eqpt
Off-road Equipment - From Installation Schedule
Off-road Equipment - Truck Mounted Cement Mixer 80 HP for typical 10 CY Concrete Mixing Truck - uses Power Take-off from Truck Engine -runs continuously during Unloading (1 hr per truck)
Off-road Equipment - Off-Highway Trucks included to include On-site Maneuvering and Idle time for Dump Trucks; Crawler Tractor included (but set to 0) to activate fugitive dust calcs
Trips and VMT - Haul Trips for Column Set based on Pieces of Eqpt (4) using CalEEMod methodology = 4x1.25 = 5 Build & Set Structures and Displays also assume 5 workers per day CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 2/3/2022 1:49 PM
Oxnard Billboard MND - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied User Defined Unit 0.25 1.00
Oxnard Billboard MND
Ventura County, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
User Defined Commercial 1.00
Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2022
Utility Company Southern California Edison

0.004

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Oxnard Blllboard Ordinance - MND - Typical Installation I I
1413
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 12.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 12.00

8.00 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.43
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 0.50
tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 180 0
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 0.00 1.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 0.25
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 9.00 80.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 0
tblEnergyUse T24E 0.00 54,000.00
Area Coating - No Coatings
Landscape Equipment - No Landscape Operations
Energy Use - 54,000 kw-hr per year Avg Billboard Energy Usage Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 2 0
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Consumer Products - No Consumer Products used as part of Operations tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 10.00
1414

0.0186 0.8054 0.3038 0.9781 0.1321 0.2886 0.3486 0.0000 1,893.7113 Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4

0.3486 0.0000
Mitigated Construction
Maximum

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG PM2.5 Total
1,939.1974
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.7410 8.0601
Unmitigated Construction
Year lb/day lb/day

2.0 Emissions Summary
ROG NOx Exhaust NBio- CO2
PM2.5
CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5

6.1432
2022 0.7410 8.0601 6.1432 0.0186 0.8054 0.3038 0.9781 0.1321 0.2886 0.3486 0.0000 1,893.7113 1,893.7113 0.3821 0.1273 1,893.7113 1,893.7113
Year lb/day lb/day
1,893.7113 0.3821 0.1273 1,939.1974

0.3821 0.1273 1,939.1974
Maximum 0.7410 8.0601 6.1432 0.0186 0.4820 0.3038 0.6546 0.0971 0.2886 0.3486 0.0000 1,893.7113 1,893.7113 0.3821 0.1273 1,939.1974 2022 0.7410 8.0601 6.1432 0.0186 0.4820 0.3038 0.6546 0.0971 0.2886 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.16 0.00 33.07 26.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5

II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
II i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1415
Column Set Pumps 1 4.00 84 0.74
Column Set Cranes 1
78 0.48
Build & Set Structure Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
Build & Set Structure Air Compressors 1 8.00
402
Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63

0.38 Drill Footing Skid Steer Loaders 1 8.00 65

8.00 231

0.31 Column Set Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 4.00 80 0.56 Column Set

0.29 4 Build & Set Digital Displays Building Construction 6/8/2022 6/8/2022 5 1 Build & Set Digital Displays Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Phase Phase Description
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days
1 Drill Footing Grading 6/1/2022 6/1/2022 5 1 Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.5
Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Drill Footing Excavators 1
Drill Footing Crawler Tractors 1 0.00 212 0.43

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
2 Column Set Building Construction 6/2/2022 6/2/2022 5 1 Column Set/Concrete Pour 3 Build & Set Structure Building Construction 6/7/2022 6/7/2022 5 1 Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – OffRoad Equipment
Build & Set Structure Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Build & Set Digital Displays Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31 Build & Set Digital Displays Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29

8.00 158 0.38
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount

0.37 Drill Footing Off-Highway Trucks 1 2.00
1416
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor Vehicle
Class

8.00 0.00 12.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Trips and VMT
Drill Footing
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
4 Column Set 4 10.00 0.00 12.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Build & Set Structure 3 10.00 0.00 8.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Build & Set Digital
Displays
2 10.00 0.00 8.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
1417
SO2 Fugitive NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO CO2e
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust CH4 N2O
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
Exhaust N2O CO2e
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5

0.1569 0.1569 0.1444 0.1444 1,020.1529 1,020.1529
ROG NOx CO
Worker 0.0247 0.0160 0.2221 5.8000e-004 0.0657 3.8000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.5000e0040.0178 58.5551 58.5551

3.2 Drill Footing - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 787.5499 787.5499 0.0503 0.1253

0.3299 1,028.4013
Total 0.4041 3.7090 5.4820 0.0105 0.5303 0.1569 0.6872 0.0573 0.1444 0.2016 1,020.1529 1,020.1529 0.3299 1,028.4013 Off-Road 0.4041 3.7090 5.4820 0.0105
826.1453
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0425 1.8111 0.4391 7.1300e-003 0.2095 0.0153 0.2248 0.0574 0.0147 0.0721

1.8600e0031.6200e00359.0832
Total 0.0673 1.8271 0.6612 7.7100e-003 0.2752 0.0157 0.2909 0.0748 0.0150 0.0898 846.1050 846.1050 0.0522 0.1269 885.2284 1418
SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
lb/day lb/day
Exhaust CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Category
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

0.1569 0.1569 0.1444 0.1444 0.0000 1,020.1529 1,020.1529 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total
Worker 0.0247 0.0160 0.2221 5.8000e-004 0.0657 3.8000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.5000e0040.0178 58.5551 58.5551 Mitigated Construction On-Site
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2068 0.0000 0.2068 0.0223 0.0000 0.0223 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
787.5499 787.5499 0.0503 0.1253

0.3299 1,028.4013
Total 0.4041 3.7090 5.4820 0.0105 0.2068 0.1569 0.3637 0.0223 0.1444 0.1667 0.0000 1,020.1529 1,020.1529 0.3299 1,028.4013 Off-Road 0.4041 3.7090 5.4820 0.0105
826.1453
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0425 1.8111 0.4391 7.1300e-003 0.2095 0.0153 0.2248 0.0574 0.0147 0.0721

1.8600e0031.6200e00359.0832
Total 0.0673 1.8271 0.6612 7.7100e-003 0.2752 0.0157 0.2909 0.0748 0.0150 0.0898 846.1050 846.1050 0.0522 0.1269 885.2284 1419
SO2 Fugitive N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Category
CH4

6.2290 4.8523 0.0107 0.2620 0.2620 0.2472

3.3 Column Set - 2022
lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5850 6.2290

0.0792 0.0151 0.0943 860.7438 860.7438

0.2472 1,032.9675 1,032.9675
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Exhaust
PM2.5

4.8523 0.0107 0.2620 0.2620 0.2472 0.2472 1,032.9675 1,032.9675 0.2492 1,039.1982 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.2492 1,039.1982
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0425 1.8111 0.4391 7.1300e-003 0.2095 0.0153 0.2248 0.0574 0.0147 0.0721 787.5499 787.5499 0.0503 0.1253 826.1453 Total 0.5850

0.0000
Worker 0.0309 0.0200 0.2776 7.2000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222 73.1939 73.1939 2.3300e0032.0200e00373.8540 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0735 1.8311 0.7167 7.8500e-003 0.2916 0.0158 0.3074 0.0526 0.1273 899.9992 1420
CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road

0.0735 1.8311 0.7167 7.8500e-003 0.2916 0.0158 0.3074 0.0792 0.0151 0.0943 860.7438 860.7438 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.5850 6.2290 4.8523 0.0107 0.2620 0.2620 0.2472 0.2472 0.0000 1,032.9675 1,032.9675 0.2492 1,039.1982

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.2492 1,039.1982
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0425 1.8111 0.4391

2.3300e0032.0200e003

7.1300e-003 0.2095 0.0153 0.2248 0.0574 0.0147 0.0721 787.5499 787.5499 0.0503 0.1253 826.1453 Total 0.5850

0.0000

6.2290 4.8523 0.0107 0.2620 0.2620 0.2472 0.2472 0.0000 1,032.9675 1,032.9675 Category

73.8540
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0526 0.1273 899.9992
Worker 0.0309 0.0200 0.2776 7.2000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222 73.1939 73.1939 1421

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0107 0.2325 0.0600 0.0102 0.0703 598.2272 598.2272 SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

6.6225 5.4044 0.0114 0.2931 0.2931 0.2784 0.2784 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 CH4

0.0593 1.2274 0.5704 5.4700e-003 0.2218

3.4 Build & Set Structure - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6818 6.6225 5.4044 0.0114 0.2931 0.2931 0.2784 0.2784 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 0.2578 1,103.1584

0.2578 1,103.1584
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0284 1.2074 0.2928 4.7500e-003 0.1397 0.0102 0.1499 0.0383 9.7800e0030.0480 525.0333 525.0333 0.0335 0.0835 550.7635 Total 0.6818
Category
N2O CO2e

0.0000
Worker 0.0309 0.0200 0.2776 7.2000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222 73.1939 73.1939 2.3300e0032.0200e00373.8540 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0359 0.0856 624.6175
1422
Category
SO2 Fugitive CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6818 6.6225 5.4044

6.6225 5.4044 0.0114 0.2931 0.2931 0.2784 0.2784 0.0000 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0114 0.2931 0.2931 0.2784 0.2784 0.0000 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 0.2578 1,103.1584

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.2578 1,103.1584
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0284 1.2074 0.2928 4.7500e-003 0.1397 0.0102 0.1499 0.0383 9.7800e0030.0480 525.0333 525.0333 0.0335 0.0835 550.7635 Total 0.6818

0.0000
Worker 0.0309 0.0200 0.2776 7.2000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222 73.1939 73.1939 2.3300e0032.0200e00373.8540 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0593 1.2274 0.5704 5.4700e-003 0.2218 0.0107 0.2325 0.0600 0.0102 0.0703 598.2272 598.2272 0.0359 0.0856 624.6175 1423
598.2272 598.2272

0.0000 0.0000

0.0359 0.0856

0.0000
SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

4.7446 2.9863 7.4500e-003 0.1841 0.1841 0.1694 0.1694 721.4502

0.0000 0.0000

0.0703

3.5 Build & Set Digital Displays - 2022
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10

0.0835 550.7635
Total 0.4091
Category
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.4091 4.7446 2.9863 7.4500e-003 0.1841 0.1841 0.1694 0.1694 721.4502 721.4502 0.2333 727.2835 721.4502

0.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222 73.1939 73.1939 2.3300e0032.0200e003

0.2333 727.2835
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0284 1.2074 0.2928 4.7500e-003 0.1397 0.0102 0.1499 0.0383 9.7800e0030.0480 525.0333 525.0333 0.0335

73.8540
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 624.6175
Worker 0.0309 0.0200 0.2776 7.2000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e004 Total 0.0593 1.2274 0.5704 5.4700e-003 0.2218 0.0107 0.2325 0.0600 0.0102 1424

4.7446 2.9863 7.4500e-003 0.1841 0.1841 0.1694
Category
CH4 N2O
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.4091 4.7446 2.9863 7.4500e-003 0.1841
CO2e
Total 0.0593 1.2274 0.5704 5.4700e-003 0.2218
SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG

0.1694 0.0000 721.4502 721.4502
NOx CO Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

0.0480 525.0333 525.0333

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0703
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CO2e

0.1841 0.1694 0.1694 0.0000 721.4502 721.4502 0.2333 727.2835 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5

0.0000 0.0000

0.2333 727.2835
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0284 1.2074 0.2928 4.7500e-003 0.1397 0.0102 0.1499 0.0383 9.7800e0030.0335 0.0835 550.7635 Total 0.4091

0.0000
Worker 0.0309 0.0200 0.2776 7.2000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222 73.1939 73.1939 2.3300e0032.0200e00373.8540 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0107 0.2325 0.0600 0.0102 598.2272 598.2272 0.0359 0.0856 624.6175 1425
0 Ventura County, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 2/3/2022 1:37 PM
Oxnard Billboard MND - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Oxnard Billboard MND
31 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2022
Utility Company Southern California Edison

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) User Defined Commercial 1.00 User Defined Unit 0.25 1.00 Off-road Equipment - Truck Mounted Cement Mixer 80 HP for typical 10 CY Concrete Mixing Truck - uses Power Take-off from Truck Engine -runs continuously during Unloading (1 hr per truck)
Off-road Equipment - Off-Highway Trucks included to include On-site Maneuvering and Idle time for Dump Trucks; Crawler Tractor included (but set to 0) to activate fugitive dust calcs
Trips and VMT - Haul Trips for Column Set based on Pieces of Eqpt (4) using CalEEMod methodology = 4x1.25 = 5 Build & Set Structures and Displays also assume 5 workers per day Grading - Fugitive dust emissions

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Oxnard Blllboard Ordinance - MND - Typical Installation Land Use - Default Lot size of 11,000 sq ft (Range: 1,000 - 15,000) Sq Ft = 1 is a unity rate for 1 Billboard for Operational Energy Construction Phase - From Buildboard Installation Schedule 1 Day for each phase. (5-7 days between Column Set and Build) Off-road Equipment - Typical Construction Eqpt
Off-road Equipment - From Installation Schedule
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
I I
1426
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 2 0
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Consumer Products - No Consumer Products used as part of Operations Area Coating - No Coatings
Landscape Equipment - No Landscape Operations
Energy Use - 54,000 kw-hr per year Avg Billboard Energy Usage Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 0.50
tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 180 0
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 0
tblEnergyUse T24E 0.00 54,000.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 9.00 80.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.43
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 0.00 1.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 0.25
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
1427

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.82 0.00 42.02 44.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 N2O

0.2784 0.2784 0.0000 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 0.3325
CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 0.6818 6.6225 5.7539 0.0114 0.6124 0.2931 0.7698 0.0790 0.2784 0.2784 0.0000 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 0.3325 2.2500e0031,103.1584 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5

2.2500e0031,103.1584
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Maximum 0.6818 6.6225 5.7539 0.0114 0.6124 0.2931 0.7698 0.0790 1,096.7143 0.3325 2.2500e003
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 0.6818 6.6225 5.7539 0.0114 0.2890 0.2931 0.4463 0.0441 0.2784 0.2784 0.0000 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 0.3325 2.2500e0031,103.1584 Maximum 0.6818 6.6225 5.7539 0.0114 0.2890 1,103.1584
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

0.2931 0.4463 0.0441 0.2784 0.2784 0.0000 1,096.7143

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
II i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1428

0.48 4 Build & Set Digital Displays Building Construction 6/8/2022 6/8/2022 5 1 Build & Set Digital Displays 2 Column Set Building Construction 6/2/2022 6/2/2022 5 1 Column Set/Concrete Pour Column Set Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
3 Build & Set Structure Building Construction 6/7/2022 6/7/2022 5 1 Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.5

0.29 Column Set Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 4.00 80
Build & Set Structure Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Build & Set Structure Air Compressors 1 8.00 78
1 4.00 84 0.74

0.56 Column Set
Build & Set Structure Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
Cranes
Column Set Pumps
Drill Footing Crawler Tractors 1 0.00 212 0.43

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Drill Footing Grading 6/1/2022 6/1/2022 5 1 Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Drill Footing Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Drill Footing Off-Highway Trucks 1 2.00 402 0.38
Drill Footing Skid Steer Loaders 1 8.00 65 0.37
Build & Set Digital Displays Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Build & Set Digital Displays Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31 1 8.00 231
1429
Build & Set Digital 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Displays
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
Trips and VMT
Build & Set Structure 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix

0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix
HHDT
Drill Footing 4 10.00
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor Vehicle
Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
HHDT
Column Set 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
1430

0.0000
Total
1,028.4013

0.5303

2.5300e0032.2500e00370.7514

70.0187 70.0187 2.5300e0032.2500e00370.7514
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4041 3.7090 5.4820 0.0105 0.1569 0.1569 0.1444 0.1444 1,020.1529 1,020.1529 0.3299 Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Worker
Total

0.0333 0.0234 0.2719 6.9000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222

0.0333 0.0234 0.2719 6.9000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222 70.0187 70.0187

3.2 Drill Footing - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000

0.4041 3.7090 5.4820 0.0105 0.5303 0.1569 0.6872 0.0573 0.1444 0.2016 1,020.1529 1,020.1529 0.3299 1,028.4013 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1431
Total 0.0333 0.0234 0.2719 6.9000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e004

0.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

70.0187 70.0187

0.4041 3.7090 5.4820 0.0105 0.2068 0.1569 0.3637
Off-Road 0.4041 3.7090 5.4820 0.0105 0.1569 0.1569 0.1444 0.1444 0.0000 1,020.1529 1,020.1529 Mitigated Construction On-Site
Total

0.3299 1,028.4013

2.5300e0032.2500e00370.7514
Worker

0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2068 0.0000 0.2068 0.0223 0.0000 0.0223 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

0.0223 0.1444 0.1667 0.0000 1,020.1529 1,020.1529 0.3299 1,028.4013 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day

0.0333 0.0234 0.2719 6.9000e-004 0.0822 4.7000e0040.0826 0.0218 4.3000e0040.0222 70.0187 70.0187 2.5300e0032.2500e00370.7514

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1432
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1,039.1982
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.5850 6.2290 4.8523 0.0107 0.2620 0.2620 0.2472 0.2472 1,032.9675 1,032.9675 0.2492

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

3.3 Column Set - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5850 6.2290 4.8523 0.0107 0.2620 0.2620 0.2472 0.2472 1,032.9675 1,032.9675 0.2492 1,039.1982 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1433

0.0000 0.0000
ROG

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.5850 6.2290 4.8523 0.0107 0.2620 0.2620 0.2472 0.2472 0.0000 1,032.9675 1,032.9675 0.2492 1,039.1982 lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5850 0.0107
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category

6.2290 4.8523 0.2620 0.2620 0.2472
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.2472 0.0000 1,032.9675 1,032.9675 0.2492 1,039.1982
NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
1434
Category
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
Total 0.6818 6.6225 5.4044 0.0114 0.2931 0.2931 0.2784 0.2784 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 0.2578 1,103.1584 Worker

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

3.4 Build & Set Structure - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6818 6.6225 5.4044 0.0114 0.2931 0.2931 0.2784 0.2784 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 0.2578 1,103.1584 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1435
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker
NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6818 6.6225 5.4044 0.0114 0.2931 0.2931 0.2784 0.2784 0.0000 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 0.2578 1,103.1584 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6818 6.6225 5.4044 0.0114 0.2931 0.2931 0.2784 0.2784 0.0000 1,096.7143 1,096.7143 0.2578 1,103.1584

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
N2O CO2e

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

0.0000
1436
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
Vendor
Total 0.4091 4.7446 2.9863 7.4500e-003 0.1841 0.1841 0.1694 0.1694 721.4502 721.4502 0.2333 727.2835 Category
Worker

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

3.5 Build & Set Digital Displays - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CH4 N2O CO2e
lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.4091 4.7446 2.9863 7.4500e-003 0.1841 0.1841 0.1694 0.1694 721.4502 721.4502 0.2333 727.2835 CO
NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1437
a
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker

0.0000
Total 0.4091 4.7446 2.9863 7.4500e-003 0.1841 0.1841 0.1694 0.1694 0.0000 721.4502 721.4502 0.2333 727.2835 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.4091 4.7446 2.9863 7.4500e-003 0.1841 0.1841 0.1694 0.1694 0.0000 721.4502 721.4502 0.2333 727.2835 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1438
1439
Appendix F
Greenhouse Gas Assumptions
and Modeling
1440
1441
Location: Oxnard, Ventura County CA
CEC Forecasting Climate Zone: 8
Utility: SCE
Construction Schedule
Phase Start Date Completion Date Work Days Notes Total Haul Trucks - round trip Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt 6/6/2022 6/7/2022 1 1 flat-bed truck 5 super 10 dump 6
Column Set / Concrete Pour 6/6/2022 6/7/2022 1
4 concrete mixing trucks
90 ton crane
hireach crane truck
6 Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure 6/8/2022 6/8/2022 1 2 48ft flatbed trailer
275 ton crane
hireach crane truck
4 Build & Set Digital Displays 6/9/2022 6/9/2022 1
2 48ft flatbed trailer
90 ton crane
hireach crane truck
4 Construction Trips
Phase # Workers/Day 1
# Worker Trips/Day (oneway)2
# Vendor
Trips/Day (oneway) # Haul Truck Trips Total
Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt 4 8 0 12
Column Set / Concrete Pour 5 10 0 12
Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure 5 10 0 8
Build & Set Digital Displays 5 10 0 8
Greenhouse Gas Assumptions and Modeling
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard MND
1442
Construction By SubPhase
Phase Equipment Type # Engine hp Hrs/day
Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt
Excavators 1 188 8
Skid Steer Loaders 1 405 8
Off-Highway Truck 1 75 2
Column Set / Concrete Pour
Aerial Lift 1 63 8
Crane 1 231 8
Concrete Mixer* 1 80 4
Concrete Pump 1 84 4
Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure
Aerial Lift 1 63 8
Crane 1 231 8
Air Compressor 1 78 8
Build & Set Digital Displays
Aerial Lift 1 63 8
Crane 2 231 8
All Equipment specified as part of typical construction equipment phasing for projects CalEEmod default horsepower and load defaults typical of construction equipment with exception noted below. *Concrete Mixer included to include Hydraulic pump for truck mounted mixer utilizing Power Take-Off mode of concrete trucks during unloading/delivery (1 hr per truck) 1443
On-road + Off-Road
Construction Impacts CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
total Construction 3.07 0.0006 0.0002 3.14
ammortized (30-yrs) 0.10 0.000019 6.33E-06 0.10
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
390.98 0.03 0.004 393.00
Billboard Electricity Use
kw-hr/yr CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
54000 9.5767 0.0008 0.0001 9.6261
Total GHG Contribution
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Operational Energy 9.58 8.10E-04 1.00E-04 9.63
Amortized Construction 0.10 1.90E-05 6.33E-06 0.10

9.68 8.29E-04 1.06E-04 9.73
Construction Impacts
MT/yr
MT/yr
MT/yr
Energy Intensity Factor (lb/MW-hr)
Operational Impacts
1444
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 2/3/2022 1:51 PM
Oxnard Billboard MND - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Oxnard Billboard MND
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
31 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2022
Utility Company Southern California Edison

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) User Defined Commercial 1.00 User Defined Unit 0.25 1.00 0 Ventura County, Annual
Off-road Equipment - Truck Mounted Cement Mixer 80 HP for typical 10 CY Concrete Mixing Truck - uses Power Take-off from Truck Engine -runs continuously during Unloading (1 hr per truck)
Off-road Equipment - Off-Highway Trucks included to include On-site Maneuvering and Idle time for Dump Trucks; Crawler Tractor included (but set to 0) to activate fugitive dust calcs
Trips and VMT - Haul Trips for Column Set based on Pieces of Eqpt (4) using CalEEMod methodology = 4x1.25 = 5 Build & Set Structures and Displays also assume 5 workers per day Grading - Fugitive dust emissions

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Oxnard Blllboard Ordinance - MND - Typical Installation Land Use - Default Lot size of 11,000 sq ft (Range: 1,000 - 15,000) Sq Ft = 1 is a unity rate for 1 Billboard for Operational Energy Construction Phase - From Buildboard Installation Schedule 1 Day for each phase. (5-7 days between Column Set and Build) Off-road Equipment - Typical Construction Eqpt
Off-road Equipment - From Installation Schedule

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population I I 1445
Consumer Products - No Consumer Products used as part of Operations Area Coating - No Coatings
Landscape Equipment - No Landscape Operations
Energy Use - 54,000 kw-hr per year Avg Billboard Energy Usage Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 2 0
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 0.00 1.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 0.25
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 0.50
tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 180 0
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 0
tblEnergyUse T24E 0.00 54,000.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 9.00 80.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.43
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 12.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 12.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 10.00
1446

0.00 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Maximum
2022 1.1700e0030.0138 0.0106 3.0000e005
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total

0.0000 3.0685

7.6000e0044.7000e0041.2400e-003 1.6000e0044.4000e0046.1000e-004 Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.05 0.00 13.71 6.25
Maximum 1.1700e0030.0138 0.0106 3.0000e0056.0000e0044.7000e0041.0700e-003 1.5000e0044.4000e0045.9000e-004

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 10.00

2.0 Emissions Summary
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr

1.1700e0030.0138 0.0106 3.0000e0057.6000e0044.7000e0041.2400e-003 1.6000e0044.4000e0046.1000e-004 0.0000 3.0685 3.0685 5.7000e0041.9000e0043.1402

0.0000 3.0685 3.0685 5.7000e0041.9000e0043.1402
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 1.1700e0030.0138 0.0106 3.0000e0056.0000e0044.7000e0041.0700e-003 1.5000e0044.4000e0045.9000e-004 0.0000 3.0685 3.0685 5.7000e0041.9000e0043.1402

3.0685 5.7000e0041.9000e0043.1402
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

0.00 0.00
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 6-6-2022 9-5-2022 0.0054 0.0054
Highest 0.0054 0.0054

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I
1447
Unmitigated Operational
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total

0.0000 9.5767 9.5767 8.1000e004Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-004 9.6261 Area 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.2 Overall Operational

0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.5767

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.5767 8.1000e0041.0000e-004 9.6261
I
I
1448
Area 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Fugitive CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total
Category
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Phase Num Days Phase Description
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
5 1 Build & Set Digital Displays
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.5
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – 3 Build & Set Structure Building Construction 6/7/2022 6/7/2022 5 1 Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure
4 Build & Set Digital Displays

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.5767 8.1000e004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

0.0000
Building Construction 6/8/2022 6/8/2022
Mitigated Operational
tons/yr MT/yr
Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 9.5767 9.5767 8.1000e0041.0000e-004 9.6261

0.0000 0.0000
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.5767 1.0000e-004 9.6261 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
1 Drill Footing Grading 6/1/2022 6/1/2022 5 1 Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt 2 Column Set Building Construction 6/2/2022 6/2/2022 5 1 Column Set/Concrete Pour

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1449
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor OffRoad Equipment
Drill Footing Skid Steer Loaders 1 8.00 65 0.37
Drill Footing Off-Highway Trucks 1 2.00 402 0.38
Drill Footing Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
Build & Set Digital Displays Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31 Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Build & Set Structure Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
Column Set Pumps 1 4.00 84 0.74
Column Set 1 8.00 231 0.29
Drill Footing Crawler Tractors 1 0.00 212 0.43
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Column Set Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 4.00 80 0.56
Column Set
Build & Set Digital Displays Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Build & Set Structure Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48
Build & Set Structure Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Cranes
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor Vehicle
Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Drill Footing 4 8.00 0.00 12.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Column Set 4 10.00 0.00 12.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Build & Set Structure 3 10.00 0.00 8.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Build & Set Digital
Displays
2 10.00 0.00 8.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
1450

4.0000e005

1.0000e0055.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3829 0.3829

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker

7.0000e-005 0.0000 0.4627 0.4627
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG PM2.5 Total

1.0000e0051.0000e0051.1000e0040.0000

3.2 Drill Footing - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.7000e0040.0000 2.7000e-004 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1.5000e0040.0000 0.4665
Total 2.0000e0041.8500e0032.7400e0031.0000e0052.7000e0048.0000e0053.5000e-004 3.0000e0057.0000e0051.0000e-004 0.0000 0.4627 0.4627 1.5000e0040.0000 0.4665 Off-Road 2.0000e0041.8500e0032.7400e0031.0000e0058.0000e0058.0000e-005 7.0000e005 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0059.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 1.0000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0051.0000e0054.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3573 0.3573 2.0000e0056.0000e0050.3748 NOx CO SO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0256 0.0256 0.0000 0.0000 0.0259 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0056.0000e005Total 3.0000e- 0.4006
005

9.5000e0043.3000e0040.0000 1.3000e0041.0000e0051.4000e-004 1451
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total

3.3000e0040.0000 1.3000e0041.0000e0051.4000e-004 4.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3829 0.3829

1.0000e0054.0000e-005

3.0000e0059.5000e004
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.4627 0.4627 1.5000e0040.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e-004 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.4665
Total 2.0000e0041.8500e0032.7400e0031.0000e0051.0000e0048.0000e0051.8000e-004 1.0000e0057.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.4627 0.4627 1.5000e0040.0000 0.4665 Off-Road 2.0000e0041.8500e0032.7400e0031.0000e0058.0000e0058.0000e-005 7.0000e0057.0000e-005 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0059.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 1.0000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0050.0000 0.3573 0.3573 2.0000e0056.0000e0050.3748

0.0000
Worker 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.1000e0040.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0256 0.0256 0.0000 0.0000 0.0259 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0056.0000e005Total 0.4006
1452
SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO PM2.5 Total

2.9000e0043.1100e0032.4300e0031.0000e0051.3000e0041.3000e-004 1.2000e0041.2000e-004 0.0000 0.4686 0.4686 Total 4.0000e0059.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.4000e0041.0000e0051.5000e-004 4.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3893 0.3893

3.3 Column Set - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.9000e0043.1100e0032.4300e0031.0000e0051.3000e0041.3000e-004 1.2000e0041.2000e-004 0.0000 0.4686 0.4686 1.1000e0040.0000 0.4714

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1.1000e0040.0000 0.4714
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0059.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 1.0000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0051.0000e0054.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3573 0.3573 2.0000e0056.0000e0050.3748 Total

0.0000
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0056.0000e0050.4071
1453
Fugitive CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total

1.0000e0051.5000e-004 4.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3893 0.3893 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

2.4300e0031.0000e0051.3000e0041.3000e-004
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

1.2000e0041.2000e-004 0.0000 0.4686 0.4686 1.1000e0040.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.9000e0043.1100e0032.4300e0031.0000e0051.3000e0041.3000e-004 1.2000e0041.2000e-004 0.0000 0.4686 0.4686 1.1000e0040.0000 0.4714

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.4714
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0059.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 1.0000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0051.0000e0054.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3573 0.3573 2.0000e0056.0000e0050.3748 Total 2.9000e0043.1100e003

0.0000
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0056.0000e005Total 4.0000e- 0.4071
005

9.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.4000e004
1454
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total

3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2702 0.2702

0.0000 0.5004

3.4 Build & Set Structure - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

2.7000e0031.0000e0051.5000e0041.5000e-004 1.4000e0041.4000e-004 0.0000 0.4975 0.4975 1.2000e0040.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.4000e0043.3100e0032.7000e0031.0000e0051.5000e0041.5000e-004 1.4000e0041.4000e-004 0.0000 0.4975 0.4975 1.2000e004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.5004
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.0000e0056.3000e0041.5000e0040.0000 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.0000e-005 2.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2382 0.2382 2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2499 Total 3.4000e0043.3100e003

0.0000
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0054.0000e005Total 3.0000e- 0.2822
005

6.4000e0042.8000e0040.0000 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 1455
Fugitive CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total

1.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2702 0.2702

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000 0.4975 0.4975 1.2000e0040.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.4000e0043.3100e0032.7000e0031.0000e0051.5000e0041.5000e-004 1.4000e0041.4000e-004 0.0000 0.4975 0.4975 1.2000e0040.0000 0.5004 Total 3.4000e- 0.5004
004

3.3100e0032.7000e003
MT/yr
Hauling 1.0000e0056.3000e0041.5000e0040.0000 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.0000e-005 2.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2382 0.2382 2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2499

1.0000e0051.5000e004
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e005 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr

1.5000e-004 1.4000e0041.4000e-004

0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0054.0000e005Total 3.0000e- 0.2822
005

6.4000e0042.8000e0040.0000 1.1000e004
1456
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO PM2.5 Total
Total 3.0000e0056.4000e0042.8000e0040.0000 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0050.0000 SO2

3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2702 0.2702

0.0000 0.3299

3.5 Build & Set Digital Displays - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

1.4900e0030.0000 9.0000e0059.0000e-005 8.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3272 0.3272 1.1000e0040.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.0000e0042.3700e0031.4900e0030.0000 9.0000e0059.0000e-005 8.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3272 0.3272 1.1000e004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.3299
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.0000e0056.3000e0041.5000e0040.0000 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.0000e-005 2.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2382 0.2382 2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2499 Total 2.0000e0042.3700e003

0.0000
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2822
1457
Fugitive CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2

3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2702 0.2702
Bio- CO2

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0323
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

9.0000e-005 8.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3272 0.3272 1.1000e0040.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.0000e0042.3700e0031.4900e0030.0000 9.0000e0059.0000e-005 8.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3272 0.3272 1.1000e0040.0000 0.3299

0.3299
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.0000e0056.3000e0041.5000e0040.0000 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.0000e-005 2.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2382 0.2382 2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2499 Total 2.0000e0042.3700e0031.4900e0030.0000 9.0000e005

0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2822
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 Total 3.0000e0056.4000e0042.8000e0040.0000 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 1458
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Annual VMT Annual VMT
User Defined Commercial 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday
User Defined Commercial 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
MH
User Defined Commercial 0.537638 0.058030 0.174616 0.137192 0.028458 0.007596 0.011602 0.006026 0.000704 0.000394 0.029425 0.000660 0.00766

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS

I I I I

I ' ' I I
I
1459
Bio- CO2

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO SO2
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

5.0 Energy Detail

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Electricity
Unmitigated
Fugitive NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.5767 9.5767 8.1000e0041.0000e-004 9.6261

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.5767 9.5767 8.1000e0040.0000 1.0000e-004 9.6261

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I I
1460
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
54000 9.5767
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

8.1000e-004 1.0000e0049.6261
Total 9.5767 8.1000e-004 1.0000e0049.6261
User Defined
Commercial
54000 9.5767 8.1000e-004 1.0000e0049.6261
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Total 9.5767 8.1000e-004 1.0000e0049.6261
1461
Fugitive NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO SO2
Total

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Bio- CO2
Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
I I
I
I
I
1462
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
I
I
I
I
1463
t
o
n
MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 / 0 0.0000
Land Use

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total
Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1464

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
User Defined
Commercial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
MT/yr
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons t
o
n
1465
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment

0.0000
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Total
II
i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i
i i i
1466
1467
Appendix G
Energy Assumptions and Data
1468
1469
Location: Oxnard, Ventura County CA
CEC Forecasting Climate Zone: 8
Utility: SCE
Construction Schedule
Phase Start Date Completion Date Work Days Notes Total Haul Trucks - round trip Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt 6/6/2022 6/7/2022 1 1 flat-bed truck 5 super 10 dump 6
Column Set / Concrete Pour 6/6/2022 6/7/2022 1
4 concrete mixing trucks
90 ton crane
hireach crane truck
6 Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure 6/8/2022 6/8/2022 1 2 48ft flatbed trailer
275 ton crane
hireach crane truck
4 Build & Set Digital Displays 6/9/2022 6/9/2022 1
2 48ft flatbed trailer
90 ton crane
hireach crane truck
4 Construction Trips
Phase # Workers/Day 1
# Worker Trips/Day (oneway)2
# Vendor
Trips/Day (oneway) # Haul Truck Trips Total
Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt 4 8 0 12
Column Set / Concrete Pour 5 10 0 12
Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure 5 10 0 8
Build & Set Digital Displays 5 10 0 8
Energy Assumptions and Data
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard MND
1470
Construction By SubPhase
Phase Equipment Type # Engine hp Hrs/day
Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt
Excavators 1 188 8
Skid Steer Loaders 1 405 8
Off-Highway Truck 1 75 2
Column Set / Concrete Pour
Aerial Lift 1 63 8
Crane 1 231 8
Concrete Mixer* 1 80 4
Concrete Pump 1 84 4
Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure
Aerial Lift 1 63 8
Crane 1 231 8
Air Compressor 1 78 8
Build & Set Digital Displays
Aerial Lift 1 63 8
Crane 2 231 8
All Equipment specified as part of typical construction equipment phasing for projects CalEEmod default horsepower and load defaults typical of construction equipment with exception noted below. *Concrete Mixer included to include Hydraulic pump for truck mounted mixer utilizing Power Take-Off mode of concrete trucks during unloading/delivery (1 hr per truck) 1471
Equipment ≤ 100 hp
pounds diesel fuel/hp-hr (lb/hp-hr):1 0.408 lb/hp-hr
diesel density (lb/gal):1 7.11 lb/gal
diesel gallons/hp-hr: 0.0574 gal/hp-hr
Total <100 1,388 hp-hr
Total diesel gallons: 80 gal
Equipment > 100 hp
pounds diesel fuel/hp-hr (lb/hp-hr):1 0.367 lb/hp-hr
diesel density (lb/gal):1 7.11 lb/gal
diesel gallons/hp-hr: 0.0516 gal/hp-hr
Total >100 2,394 hp-hr
Total diesel gallons: 124 gal
Total diesel gallons (off-road equipment): 203 gal

1. OFFROAD2017 Emission Factor Documentation
Construction Phase Equipment Number Hours/Day HP Load Days Total hp-hr Drill Footing Excavators 1 8 158 0.38 1 480
Drill Footing Off-Highway Trucks 1 2 402 0.38 1 306
Drill Footing Skid Steer Loaders 1 8 65 0.37 1 192
Column Set Aerial Lifts 1 8 63 0.31 1 156
Column Set Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 4 80 0.56 1 179
Column Set Cranes 1 8 231 0.29 1 536
Column Set Pumps 1 4 84 0.74 1 249
Build & Set Structure Aerial Lifts 1 8 63 0.31 1 156
Build & Set Structure Air Compressors 1 8 78 0.48 1 300 Build & Set Structure Cranes 1 8 231 0.29 1 536
Build & Set Digital Displays Aerial Lifts 1 8 63 0.31 1 156 Build & Set Digital Displays Cranes 1 8 231 0.29 1 536
Total >100 2,394
Total <100 1,388
Oxnard Buildboard Ordinance MND
Construction Energy Analysis
Off-Road Equipment
1472
Construction Phase
& Trip Type
Vehicle
Class
Vehicle Fuel Trip Number Trip Length
(mi)
Total
VMT
Phase Emissions
CO2(MT)
Fuel Equivalency
(MT CO2/gal)
Fuel Consumption
Gallons
Drill Footing
Worker HHDT Diesel 12 20 240 0.357 10.181E-03 35.10
Vendor HHDT Diesel 0 7.3 0 0.000 10.180E-03 0.00
Haul LDA_Mix Gasoline 8 10.8 86.4 0.026 8.887E-03 2.88
Column Set
Worker HHDT Diesel 12 20 240 0.357 10.181E-03 35.10
Vendor HHDT Diesel 0 7.3 0 0.000 10.180E-03 0.00
Haul LDA_Mix Gasoline 10 10.8 108 0.032 8.887E-03 3.60
Build & Set Structure
Worker HHDT Diesel 8 20 160 0.238 10.181E-03 23.40
Vendor HHDT Diesel 0 7.3 0 0.000 10.180E-03 0.00
Haul LDA_Mix Gasoline 10 10.8 108 0.032 8.887E-03 3.60
Build & Set Digital Displays
Worker HHDT Diesel 8 20 160 0.238 10.181E-03 23.40
Vendor HHDT Diesel 0 7.3 0 0.000 10.180E-03 0.00
Haul LDA_Mix Gasoline 10 10.8 108 0.032 8.887E-03 3.60
Diesel 117.0
Gasoline 13.7
Calculated CalEEMod CO2e emisions include EMFAC estimate emissions from start and idle modes as well as running mode fuel consumption based on fuel equivalencies to determine total fuel consumption including these modes.

Fuel Equivalency Factors (US EPA, IPCC)
https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gases-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references IPCC (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 2 (Energy). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland Gasoline = 8.887 × 10-3 metric tons CO2/gallon of gasoline Diesel =10.180 x 10-3 metric tons CO2/gallon of diesel
Off-Road Equipment
Oxnard Buildboard Ordinance MND
Construction Energy Analysis
1473

1.00 User Defined Unit 0.25 1.00 0
Ventura County, Annual
Off-road Equipment - Truck Mounted Cement Mixer 80 HP for typical 10 CY Concrete Mixing Truck - uses Power Take-off from Truck Engine -runs continuously during Unloading (1 hr per truck)
Off-road Equipment - Off-Highway Trucks included to include On-site Maneuvering and Idle time for Dump Trucks; Crawler Tractor included (but set to 0) to activate fugitive dust calcs
Trips and VMT - Haul Trips for Column Set based on Pieces of Eqpt (4) using CalEEMod methodology = 4x1.25 = 5 Build & Set Structures and Displays also assume 5 workers per day Grading - Fugitive dust emissions

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Oxnard Blllboard Ordinance - MND - Typical Installation Land Use - Default Lot size of 11,000 sq ft (Range: 1,000 - 15,000) Sq Ft = 1 is a unity rate for 1 Billboard for Operational Energy Construction Phase - From Buildboard Installation Schedule 1 Day for each phase. (5-7 days between Column Set and Build) Off-road Equipment - Typical Construction Eqpt
Off-road Equipment - From Installation Schedule

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 2/3/2022 1:51 PM
Oxnard Billboard MND - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Oxnard Billboard MND
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
31 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2022
Utility Company Southern California Edison

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) User Defined Commercial I I
1474
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 12.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 12.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 4.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 9.00 80.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.43 0.43
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 0.00 1.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 0.25
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 0.50
tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 180 0
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 0
tblEnergyUse T24E 0.00 54,000.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 1.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 2 0
Default Value New Value
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Consumer Products - No Consumer Products used as part of Operations Area Coating - No Coatings
Landscape Equipment - No Landscape Operations
Energy Use - 54,000 kw-hr per year Avg Billboard Energy Usage Table Name Column Name
1475

0.00 0.00
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 6-6-2022 9-5-2022 0.0054 0.0054
Highest 0.0054 0.0054

3.0685 5.7000e0041.9000e0043.1402
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 1.1700e0030.0138 0.0106 3.0000e0056.0000e0044.7000e0041.0700e-003 1.5000e0044.4000e0045.9000e-004 0.0000 3.0685 3.0685 5.7000e0041.9000e0043.1402 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr

1.1700e0030.0138 0.0106 3.0000e0057.6000e0044.7000e0041.2400e-003 1.6000e0044.4000e0046.1000e-004 0.0000 3.0685 3.0685 5.7000e0041.9000e0043.1402

0.0000 3.0685 3.0685 5.7000e0041.9000e0043.1402
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 10.00

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5

7.6000e0044.7000e0041.2400e-003 1.6000e0044.4000e0046.1000e-004 Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.05 0.00 13.71 6.25
Maximum 1.1700e0030.0138 0.0106 3.0000e0056.0000e0044.7000e0041.0700e-003 1.5000e0044.4000e004 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total

5.9000e-004 0.0000 3.0685
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

0.00 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Maximum
2022 1.1700e0030.0138 0.0106 3.0000e005

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I
1476

9.5767 8.1000e004

1.0000e-004 9.6261

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.5767

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.2 Overall Operational

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 9.5767 9.5767 8.1000e004Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-004 9.6261 Area 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total
Unmitigated Operational
I
I
1477

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
1 Drill Footing Grading 6/1/2022 6/1/2022 5 1 Drill Footing / Haul & Disposal Dirt 2 Column Set Building Construction 6/2/2022 6/2/2022 5 1 Column Set/Concrete Pour

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.5767 1.0000e-004 9.6261 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction

0.0000 0.0000
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Operational
tons/yr MT/yr
Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 9.5767 9.5767 8.1000e0041.0000e-004 9.6261
Building Construction 6/8/2022 6/8/2022

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.5767 8.1000e004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

0.0000
Phase Num Days Phase Description
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
5 1 Build & Set Digital Displays
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.5
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – 3 Build & Set Structure Building Construction 6/7/2022 6/7/2022 5 1 Set Top Column / Build & Set Structure
4 Build & Set Digital Displays
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Area 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Fugitive CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total
Category
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1478

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Build & Set Structure 3 10.00 0.00 8.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Build & Set Digital
Displays
2 10.00 0.00 8.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor Vehicle
Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Drill Footing 4 8.00 0.00 12.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Column Set 4 10.00 0.00 12.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Column Set Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 4.00 80 0.56
Column Set
Build & Set Digital Displays Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Build & Set Structure Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48
Build & Set Structure Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Cranes
Build & Set Structure Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
Column Set Pumps 1 4.00 84 0.74
Column Set 1 8.00 231 0.29
Drill Footing Crawler Tractors 1 0.00 212 0.43
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31
Build & Set Digital Displays Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31 Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Drill Footing Skid Steer Loaders 1 8.00 65 0.37
Drill Footing Off-Highway Trucks 1 2.00 402 0.38
Drill Footing Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor OffRoad Equipment
1479

2.0000e005

6.0000e005Total 3.0000e- 0.4006
005

9.5000e0043.3000e0040.0000 1.3000e0041.0000e0051.4000e-004

3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0256 0.0256 0.0000 0.0000 0.0259 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0059.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 1.0000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0051.0000e0054.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3573 0.3573 2.0000e0056.0000e0050.3748 NOx CO SO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

1.5000e0040.0000 0.4665
Total 2.0000e0041.8500e0032.7400e0031.0000e0052.7000e0048.0000e0053.5000e-004 3.0000e0057.0000e0051.0000e-004 0.0000 0.4627 0.4627 1.5000e0040.0000 0.4665 Off-Road 2.0000e0041.8500e0032.7400e0031.0000e0058.0000e0058.0000e-005 7.0000e005 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.7000e0040.0000 2.7000e-004 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

3.2 Drill Footing - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG PM2.5 Total

1.0000e0051.0000e0051.1000e0040.0000

7.0000e-005 0.0000 0.4627 0.4627

4.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3829 0.3829

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker
1480

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0056.0000e005Total 0.4006

0.0000 0.3573 0.3573 2.0000e0056.0000e0050.3748

0.0000
Worker 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.1000e0040.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0256 0.0256 0.0000 0.0000 0.0259 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.4665
Off-Road 2.0000e0041.8500e0032.7400e0031.0000e0058.0000e0058.0000e-005 7.0000e0057.0000e-005 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0059.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 1.0000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e005 Total 2.0000e0041.8500e0032.7400e0031.0000e0051.0000e0048.0000e0051.8000e-004 1.0000e0057.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.4627 0.4627 1.5000e0040.0000

0.4627 0.4627 1.5000e0040.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e-004 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.4665
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

3.0000e0059.5000e004
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total

3.3000e0040.0000 1.3000e0041.0000e0051.4000e-004 4.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3829 0.3829

1.0000e0054.0000e-005
1481

2.0000e005

6.0000e0050.4071

0.0000
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1.1000e0040.0000 0.4714
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0059.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 1.0000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0051.0000e0054.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3573 0.3573 2.0000e0056.0000e0050.3748 Total
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.9000e0043.1100e0032.4300e0031.0000e0051.3000e0041.3000e-004 1.2000e0041.2000e-004 0.0000 0.4686 0.4686 1.1000e0040.0000 0.4714

3.3 Column Set - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 4.0000e0059.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.4000e0041.0000e0051.5000e-004 4.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3893 0.3893

2.9000e0043.1100e0032.4300e0031.0000e0051.3000e0041.3000e-004 1.2000e0041.2000e-004 0.0000 0.4686 0.4686 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total
1482

2.0000e005

6.0000e005Total 4.0000e- 0.4071
005

9.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.4000e004

0.0000
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.4714
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.0000e0059.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 1.0000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0051.0000e0054.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3573 0.3573 2.0000e0056.0000e0050.3748 Total 2.9000e0043.1100e0031.2000e0041.2000e-004 0.0000 0.4686 0.4686 1.1000e0040.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.9000e0043.1100e0032.4300e0031.0000e0051.3000e0041.3000e-004 1.2000e0041.2000e-004 0.0000 0.4686 0.4686 1.1000e0040.0000 0.4714 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

1.0000e0051.5000e-004 4.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3893 0.3893 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

2.4300e0031.0000e0051.3000e0041.3000e-004
Fugitive CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total
1483

2.0000e005

4.0000e005Total 3.0000e- 0.2822
005

6.4000e0042.8000e0040.0000 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004

0.0000
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.5004
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.0000e0056.3000e0041.5000e0040.0000 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.0000e-005 2.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2382 0.2382 2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2499 Total 3.4000e0043.3100e0032.7000e0031.0000e0051.5000e0041.5000e-004 1.4000e0041.4000e-004 0.0000 0.4975 0.4975 1.2000e0040.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.4000e0043.3100e0032.7000e0031.0000e0051.5000e0041.5000e-004 1.4000e0041.4000e-004 0.0000 0.4975 0.4975 1.2000e0040.0000 0.5004

3.4 Build & Set Structure - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2702 0.2702
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total
1484

2.0000e005

4.0000e005Total 3.0000e- 0.2822
005

6.4000e0042.8000e0040.0000 1.1000e004

0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1.0000e0051.5000e004
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e005 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr

1.5000e-004 1.4000e0041.4000e-004
MT/yr
Hauling 1.0000e0056.3000e0041.5000e0040.0000 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.0000e-005 2.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2382 0.2382 2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2499

0.0000 0.4975 0.4975 1.2000e0040.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.4000e0043.3100e0032.7000e0031.0000e0051.5000e0041.5000e-004 1.4000e0041.4000e-004 0.0000 0.4975 0.4975 1.2000e0040.0000 0.5004 Total 3.4000e- 0.5004
004

3.3100e0032.7000e003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total

1.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2702 0.2702

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320
1485

2.0000e005

4.0000e0050.2822

0.0000
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.3299
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.0000e0056.3000e0041.5000e0040.0000 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.0000e-005 2.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2382 0.2382 2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2499 Total 2.0000e0042.3700e0031.4900e0030.0000 9.0000e0059.0000e-005 8.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3272 0.3272 1.1000e0040.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.0000e0042.3700e0031.4900e0030.0000 9.0000e0059.0000e-005 8.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3272 0.3272 1.1000e0040.0000 0.3299

3.5 Build & Set Digital Displays - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 3.0000e0056.4000e0042.8000e0040.0000 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004 3.0000e0050.0000 SO2

3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2702 0.2702
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO PM2.5 Total
1486
Total 3.0000e005

6.4000e0042.8000e0040.0000 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.1000e-004

2.0000e0042.3700e0031.4900e0030.0000 9.0000e005

0.0000 0.0000

2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2822
Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.3000e0040.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0320 0.0320 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.0000e0056.3000e0041.5000e0040.0000 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.0000e-005 2.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2382 0.2382 2.0000e0054.0000e0050.2499

9.0000e-005 8.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3272 0.3272 1.1000e0040.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.0000e0042.3700e0031.4900e0030.0000 9.0000e0059.0000e-005 8.0000e0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.3272 0.3272 1.1000e0040.0000 0.3299 Total 0.3299
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0323
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2702 0.2702
SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO PM2.5 Total
1487

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH User Defined Commercial 0.537638 0.058030 0.174616 0.137192 0.028458 0.007596 0.011602 0.006026 0.000704 0.000394 0.029425 0.000660 0.00766 Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday
User Defined Commercial 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Annual VMT Annual VMT
User Defined Commercial 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2

0.0000
tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category

I I I I

I ' ' I I
I
1488
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.5767 9.5767 8.1000e0040.0000 1.0000e-004 9.6261
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.5767 9.5767 8.1000e0041.0000e-004 9.6261

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Electricity
Unmitigated
Fugitive NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

5.0 Energy Detail

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Bio- CO2 I I
1489
Total 9.5767 8.1000e-004 1.0000e004

9.6261

8.1000e-004 1.0000e0049.6261
Total 9.5767 8.1000e-004 1.0000e0049.6261
User Defined
Commercial
54000 9.5767 8.1000e-004 1.0000e0049.6261
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
54000 9.5767
1490

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Bio- CO2
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
I I
I
I
I
1491
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM2.5 Total
I
I
I
I
1492
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 / 0 0.0000
Land Use

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total
Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1493
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons t
o
n
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
User Defined
Commercial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
MT/yr

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
t
o
n
MT/yr
1494
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Total
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment

0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
User Defined
Commercial
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
II
i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i
i i i
1495

5. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard 5-3 ESA / 202000387.01 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Mitigation Measures Timing
Responsible for
Implementation
Responsible for
Enforcement
Date of
Compliance
archaeological data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.

CUL-2: Prior to ground disturbance, the applicant is required to retain a paleontologist for monitoring of ground disturbing activities. In the event that paleontological resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, these activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and collected.

Monitoring shall include matrix screening for the presence of microfossils; however, monitoring is largely a visual inspection of sediment.

Retain
Paleontologist
prior to ground
disturbance and
halt or divert
activities if
resources are
found until they
are evaluated
Applicant and Project
Paleontologist
Community
Development
Department
1496

VENTURA ROAD ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD
Response to Comments on Public Review Draft
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
State Clearinghouse Number 2022060700
Prepared for October 2022
City of Oxnard
Community Development Department
1497
1498

VENTURA ROAD ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD
Response to Comments on Public Review Draft
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Prepared for October 2022
City of Oxnard
Community Development Department
214 South C Street
Oxnard, California 93030
805.385.8272

16755 Von Karman Avenue
Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92606
949.753.7001
esassoc.com

Bend
Camarillo
Delray Beach
Destin
Irvine
Los Angeles
Oakland
Orlando
Pasadena
Petaluma
Portland
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
Sarasota
Seattle
Tampa

1499

OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. 1500
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard i ESA / 202000387.02
Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard: Response to
Comments on Public Review Draft Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 CEQA Requirements........................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 CEQA Process .................................................................................................... 1-2

2.0 Comment Letters........................................................................................................ 2-1

3.0 Responses to Comments .......................................................................................... 3-1

4.0 Errata ........................................................................................................................... 4-1

5.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ....................................................... 5-1 1501
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard ii ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page intentionally left blank
1502
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 1-1 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
This Response to Comments document was prepared to respond to comments that were received on the Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Public Review Draft IS/MND). The Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final IS/MND) consists of the Public Review Draft IS/MND and this Response to Comments document. The Final IS/MND has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as amended (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and CEQA Guidelines (California Administrative Code Section 15000 et seq.). Documents relating to this Final IS/MND were cited and incorporated. All documents are available for review at the City of Oxnard website:
https://www.oxnard.org/city-department/community-development/planning/environmentaldocuments/.

1.1 CEQA Requirements
Before the City of Oxnard may approve the project, it must certify that the Final IS/MND: a) has been completed in compliance with CEQA; b) was presented to the Oxnard City Council who reviewed and considered it prior to approving the project; and c) reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15074 states that prior to approving a project, the decision-making body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process. Therefore, the decision making body will be considering the following documents that constitute the Final IS/MND prior to making a decision on the project.
 The Public Review Draft IS/MND
 Response to Comment Document which includes:
­ Comments and recommendations received on the Public Review Draft IS/MND; ­ A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Public Review Draft IS/MND;
­ The response of the Lead Agency to substantive environmental points raised in the review and consultation process.
1503

1. Introduction
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 1-2 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This Response to Comments document for the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard presents the following chapters:
 Chapter 1: Introduction – this chapter incudes an introduction to the Response to Comments and the CEQA process and requirements
 Chapter 2: Comment Letters – this chapter includes a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Public Review Draft IS/MND  Chapter 3: Response to Comments – this chapter includes the written comments received on the Public Review Draft IS/MND as well as the written responses to each comment  Chapter 4: Errata – this chapter includes any revisions made to the Public Review Draft IS/MND in response to comments received or initiated by the Lead Agency  Chapter 5: Mitigation and Monitoring Program (MMRP) – this chapter includes a list of the mitigation measures, identification of the responsible implementation agency, agency responsible for monitoring, timing of implementation, and date of compliance for each mitigation measure

1.2 CEQA Process
Public Participation Process
Notice of Intent of the Public Review Draft IS/MND
The Notice of Intent (NOI) of the Public Review Draft IS/MND was posted on June 30, 2022 with the Ventura County Clerk Recorder. The Public Review Draft IS/MND was circulated for a 30-day public review until July 29, 2022. The NOI for the Public Review Draft IS/MND was circulated to state and local agencies and interested parties requesting a copy of the NOI. Copies of the Public Review Draft IS/MND were made available for review at the City of Oxnard Community Development Department located at 214 S. C Street, Oxnard, California, 93030 and at the Oxnard Public Library, 251 South “A” Street. The document was also available at the City of Oxnard website: https://www.oxnard.org/city-department/communitydevelopment/planning/environmental-documents/.

Evaluation and Response to Comments
In accordance with Article 6 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Oxnard, as the Lead Agency, was required to evaluate substantive environmental comments received on the Public Review Draft IS/MND. This Response to Comments document provides written responses to each comment received on the Public Review Draft IS/MND.
1504

1. Introduction
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 1-3 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Final IS/MND Approval
As the Lead Agency, the City of Oxnard is required to determine the adequacy of the Final IS/MND (Public Review Draft IS/MND and Response to Comments). The City can adopt the Final IS/MND if they find on the basis of the whole record before it (including the Public Review Draft IS/MND and Response to Comments) that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Final IS/MND reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.

Notice of Determination
Pursuant to Section 15094 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Oxnard will file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the Ventura County Clerk Recorder within five working days of project approval.
1505

1. Introduction
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 1-4 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page intentionally left blank
1506
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 2-1 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
CHAPTER 2
Comment Letters
The Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Public Review Draft IS/MND) for the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard was circulated for public review for 30 days (June 30, 2022 through July 29, 2022). The City of Oxnard received five comment letters from public agencies during the public review period, as listed in the table below. Each comment letter has been assigned an alphabetical designation (A through E). Each comment within each letter has been assigned a numerical designation so that each comment could be cross-referenced with an individual response. The comments and responses are provided in Chapter 3.

COMMENT LETTERS RECEIVED
Comment
No. Commenting Agency Date of Comment
A California Department of Fish and Wildlife July 29, 2022 B California Highway Patrol July 27, 2022
C County of Ventura Resource Management Agency, Planning Division July 29, 2022 D County of Ventura Resource Management Agency, Watershed Protection District July 29, 2022 E Ventura County Air Pollution Control District July 26, 2022 1507

2. Comment Letters
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 2-2 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page intentionally left blank
1508
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-1 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
CHAPTER 3
Responses to Comments
Following are the comment letters and the written responses to each of the comments that were received during the public review period of the Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Public Review Draft IS/MND). In some instances, in response to the comment, the City of Oxnard has made additions or deletions to the text of the Public Review Draft IS/MND; additions are included as underlined text and deletions are shown as stricken text. 1509
A-1
Comment Letter A
1510
A-1
(Cont)
A-2
1511
A-2
(Cont)
A-3
1512
A-3
(Cont)
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
1513
A-7
(Cont)
A-8
A-9
1514
A-9
(Cont)
A-10
1515
A-10
(Cont)
A-11
A-12
A-13
1516
A-13
(Cont)
1517
A-13
(Cont)
A-14
1518
A-14
(Cont)
A-15
A-16
A-17
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-22 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Comment Letter A: California Department of Fish and Wildlife – July 29, 2022
Comment A-1
This comment states that California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) reviewed the Public Review Draft IS/MND, and that CDFW’s role is California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and a Responsible Agency for lake and streambed alteration in accordance with Fish and Game Code Section 1600. The comment also describes the CDFW role as a Responsible Agency for potential “take” of any species protected under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). In addition, this comment provides a summary of the Project description.

Furthermore, this comment provides a reference to the specific comments provided in Comments A-2 through A-17.

Response to Comment A-1
The City of Oxnard thanks CDFW for its review of the Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Public Review Draft IS/MND) and its recommendations.

This comment does not provide specific comments on the contents of the environmental analysis provided in the Public Review Draft IS/MND. The comment indicates under what circumstances CDFW would be considered a responsible agency for which a permit may be required under the State Fish and Game Code.

The description of the Project location is not accurate. The comment states that the Project is located within the bank and levee of the Santa Clara River. This description is incorrect. The Project location is within the current right-of-way of Ventura Road and east of the existing Santa Clara River Basin levee. The base of the proposed electronic billboard would not be located on the basin side of the existing levee.

The 1,000 square foot Project site includes ornamental landscaping, and no special-status species were observed on the Project site that would require a Section 2081 “take” permit of the Fish and Game Code. In addition, since the Project is located outside of the existing Santa Clara River Basin, a lake and streambed alteration agreement in accordance with Fish and Game Code Section 1600 would not be required.

Comment A-2
This comment raises a concern that Project activities may result in changes to the stream and/or associated sensitive riparian vegetation communities which are subject to the Fish and Game Code. Specifically, the comment states grading, excavation, material staging, grubbing and vegetation clearing may result in direct mortality and loss of sensitive vegetation communities and special status wildlife. In addition, the comment includes recommended mitigation measures.

Response to Comment A-2
Appendix E of the Public Review Draft IS/MND includes a map of the existing biological resources on the Project site as well as in the vicinity of the Project site. As illustrated, the Project 1530

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-23 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration
site contains ornamental landscaping, and there is currently a barrier (i.e., levee) that is located between the Project site and the Santa Clara River Basin. The removal of ornamental landscaping would not constitute the loss of sensitive vegetation communities. In addition, there were no special status wildlife species observed or expected to be located within the ornamental landscaping on the Project site. Therefore, the construction activities would not result in the direct mortality or loss of sensitive vegetation communities and special-status wildlife species.

Comment A-3
This comment raises a concern that construction and related activities such as staging and using heavy equipment could result in direct injury or mortality of fish, reptile and mammal species of special concern (SSC). The comment also states that construction activities would increase ambient noise and vibration, night lighting and other activities.

Response to Comment A-3
The comment is correct regarding construction activities increasing noise, vibration, and lighting in the Project vicinity. Construction activities are not expected to result in any direct impacts on sensitive plant or wildlife species on the Project site because the ornamental landscaping that is proposed to be removed does not support sensitive plant or sensitive wildlife species. Therefore, no direct impacts to the coast horned lizard would occur. As identified in Section 3.4 of the Public Review Draft IS/MND, construction activities that are expected to occur over a two-week period could result in impacts to special-status avian species such as the least Bell’s vireo and yellow warbler. However, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 is recommended to ensure construction activities occur outside the nesting season (i.e., January 1st to September 15th as revised in Chapter 4, Errata of this Response to Comments Document) for the birds in the region. If construction activities occur within the nesting season, a pre-construction survey is required for active nests and if no sign of nesting activity is observed, construction could proceed. Mitigation Measure BIO-2 is recommended to avoid impacts to nesting least Bell’s vireo whose existing suitable habitat is located approximately 220 feet northwest of the Project site.

Also provided in Section 3.4 of the Public Review Draft IS/MND was a discussion of general effects of light on migrating birds. Response 3.4 d) states that “it is known that migrating birds are attracted to artificial light sources… Direct effects of migrating birds becoming attracted to artificial light sources include collisions with lighting, communication and power structures, buildings, or even the ground.”. As discussed in the Public Review Draft IS/MND, areas surrounding the Project site and Santa Clara River riparian area are highly developed and urbanized with commercial and residential development, all of which contribute to increased nighttime illuminance. In addition, U.S. 101 crosses over the Santa Clara River Basin immediately adjacent to and southwest of Project site and is lined on either side with street lighting. Based on a lighting study conducted for the Project, a maximum illuminance value from the proposed electronic billboard of less than 0.2 foot-candles (fc) would occur at the edge of the willow riparian woodland habitat. Although it is understood that increased ambient lighting can affect wildlife behavior, no quantitative increase in illuminance above ambient light is agreed 1531

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-24 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
upon as a threshold for significant impacts to wildlife. Based on information from the International Commission on Illuminance (CIE), impacts on natural areas would occur with an illuminance of 0.2 fc or greater. Because the Project would result in an illuminance of less than

0.2 fc, the Project would result in a less than significant lighting impact.

Comment A-4
The comment asserts that lights on elevated structures have been found to attract bird species causing them to veer off migration routes or cause collisions. In addition, the comment asserts that birds in adjacent habitat such as the coastal sage scrub could be impacted from light emitted from the proposed billboard.

Response to Comment A-4
As discussed above in Response to Comment A-3, the increase in lighting onto the adjacent sensitive willow riparian woodland habitat would be limited to less than 0.2 fc which would result in a less than significant impact due to the existing illumination in the Project vicinity.

As discussed in Section 3.4 and illustrated in Appendix E of the Public Review Draft IS/MND, coastal sage scrub is located on the basin side of the existing levee. The coastal sage scrub habitat is located between the levee and an access road within the Santa Clara River Basin. The area of the coastal sage scrub habitat is approximately 60 feet wide and approximately 500 feet in length.

During project operation, the proposed billboard would result in a range of illuminance onto an approximately 150 linear foot by 60-foot wide portion of the coastal sage scrub of 0.2-fc to approximately 0.9 fc. No sensitive avian species are associated with the coastal sage scrub habitat, and this habitat currently is exposed to existing lighting systems associated with the U.S. 101 freeway lights that line the U.S. 101 bridge over the Santa Clara River Basin. In addition, there are existing street lights located along Ventura Road that provide illumination of this area that is directly adjacent to the existing levee.

Comment A-5
This comment identifies that noise can disrupt wildlife species behavior such as nesting birds.

Response to Comment A-5
As discussed in Section 3.4 a) of the Public Review Draft IS/MND, the Project construction activities that are expected to extend over an approximately two-week time-frame could increase noise levels for nesting bird species in the Project vicinity. Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 are identified to reduce the potential noise impact to nesting birds to less than significant.

Comment A-6
This comment asserts that Project construction activities may directly or through habitat modification, result in direct mortality, reduced reproductive capacity, population declines or local extirpation of special status species. The comment also asserts that Project activities could result in a take of a special-status species.
1532

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-25 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration
Response to Comment A-6
As identified in Response to Comment A-2, the Project site contains ornamental landscaping, and there is currently a barrier (i.e., levee) that is located between the Project site and the Santa Clara River Basin. The removal of ornamental landscaping would not constitute the loss of sensitive vegetation communities. In addition, there were no special-status wildlife species observed or expected to be located within the ornamental landscaping on the Project site. Therefore, the construction activities would not result in the direct mortality or loss of sensitive vegetation communities and special-status wildlife or result in a take of a special-status species.

Comment A-7
This comment states that appropriate handling permits are required to capture, temporarily possess, and relocate wildlife to avoid harm or mortality from Project construction activities.

Response to Comment A-7
As stated in Response to Comment A-2, the Project site contains ornamental landscaping. Project construction activities would not result in the direct mortality or loss of sensitive vegetation communities and special-status wildlife or result in a take of a special-status species.

Comment A-8
This comment includes a recommendation to include shields for the bottom of the proposed electronic billboard to further reduce the illumination of habitats immediately adjacent to the Project site. This comment also suggest that the design of the proposed electronic billboard avoid the use of blue-light emitting and ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (LEDs).

Response to Comment A-8
As discussed in Section 1.7 of the Public Review Draft IS/MND, louvers will be located above each row of lights to prevent light from projecting upward into the sky. The recommendation of using louvers to reduce the illumination of the ground surface is not feasible because the use of louvers below each row of LED lighting would eliminate the ability of motorists to read the electronic billboard due to the viewing angle of the motorists. As discussed in Section 3.1 d) of the Public Review Draft IS/MND, light impacts on the existing willow riparian habitat area within the Santa Clara River Basin would not increase illumination by more than 0.2 fc.

Therefore, the implementation of the proposed electronic billboard would result in less than significant lighting impacts on the adjacent habitat. The proposed electronic billboard includes the use of each color of LED including blue-light; however, the electronic billboard does not use ultraviolet LEDs.

Comment A-9
This comment recommends the inclusion of six mitigation measures.

Mitigation measure #3 recommends the monitoring of noise generated during Project construction activities as well as post-construction activities. 1533

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-26 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Mitigation measure #4 recommends that construction equipment should use noise reduction features. This measure also states that stationary noise sources such as generators and pumps used during construction be shielded and that vehicle use and idling time be minimized.

Mitigation measure #5 recommends that a qualified biologist is retained during vegetation removal to conduct focused surveys for species of special concern and suitable habitat.

Mitigation measure #6 recommends moving wildlife species so that there would not be a direct impact during construction activities.

Mitigation measure #7 recommends the preparation of a worker environmental awareness training for construction personnel.

Mitigation measure #8 recommends construction activities to stop if species of special concern (special-status species) are harmed during relocation or are injured or die.

Response to Comment A-9
Following are responses to each of the recommended mitigation measures.

Recommended mitigation measure #3 - Mitigation Measure BIO-1 in Section 3.4 a) of the Public Review Draft IS/MND includes conducting construction activities outside of the nesting season.

The measure also includes requirements if construction activities occur during the nesting season.

These requirements include a pre-construction nesting bird survey and creation of a buffer to ensure that no direct or indirect impacts to an active nest or nesting activities occur.

Recommended mitigation measure #4 - As discussed in Section 3.12 f) of the Public Review Draft IS/MND, the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 would reduce potential noise impacts to nesting birds to less than significant. In addition, construction activities would not include the use of generators or pumps that could require shielding.

Recommended mitigation measure #5 – As discussed in Mitigation Measure BIO-1, a biological monitor will be required if construction activities occur during the nesting season. However, because the Project site includes only ornamental landscaping, no special-status species would be directly impacted from vegetation removal. Therefore, no natural habitat would be removed.

Recommended mitigation measure #6 – As stated previously in Response to Comment A-1, the Project site includes ornamental landscaping, and no special-status species were observed on the Project site. Therefore, no special-status species are present in the onsite ornamental landscaping and would not require relocation.

Recommended mitigation measure #7 – Because the Project site only includes ornamental landscaping, a worker environmental awareness training would not be required because the ornamental landscaping does not provide habitat for special-status species. 1534

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-27 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration
Recommended mitigation measure #8 – Because no special-status species are located on the Project site, special-status species would not be harmed during onsite construction activities.

Comment A-10
The comment asserts that protocol surveys for special-status species need to be conducted because ground clearing and construction activities could lead to direct mortality of listed species or species of special concern (special status species) including the coast horned lizard. In addition, this comment also infers that the Project site includes occupied habitat for listed species or species of special concern and recommends measures (mitigation measure #1 and #2) to reduce impacts.

Response to Comment A-10
Because the Project site only includes ornamental landscaping, the Project site’s vegetation does not provide habitat for the coast horned lizard or any species of special concern. In addition, the habitat for the coast horned lizard is within the Santa Clara River Basin which is physically separated from the Project site by the existing levee on the east side of the River Basin. As a result, the recommended measures (mitigation measures #1 and #2) are not appropriate for the proposed removal of ornamental landscaping.

Comment A-11
This comment recommends that Mitigation Measure BIO-1 be modified to avoid nesting birds, including raptors, from January 1st through September 15th and if nests are observed that nests are protected by a minimum 500-foot radius during construction.

Response to Comment A-11
Although Mitigation Measure BIO-1 provides adequate mitigation to reduce potential impacts to active nests, the measure on page 27 is modified as follows:

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Construction activities involving vegetation removal as well as installation of the proposed billboard shall be conducted between September 16 and December January 31, outside the typical nesting season for birds and raptors in the region. If vegetation removal or installation must occur during the typical nesting season (January February 1 – September 15 August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for active nests within areas that will be subject to vegetation removal, construction noise, and/or ground disturbances, including a 100 to 3 500-foot buffer around existing trees and landscaped areas, to identify any potential active nests within seven days prior to work activities. Buffer distances can be adjusted at the discretion of the biologist based on the location of the nest, species, and surrounding land uses. If no sign of nesting activity is observed, construction may proceed without potential impacts to nesting birds.

If an active nest is observed during the pre-construction clearance survey, an adequate buffer determined by the City-approved qualified biologist shall be established around the 1535

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-28 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
active nest depending on sensitivity of the species and proximity to construction activity and impact areas. Onsite construction monitoring may also be required to ensure that no direct or indirect impacts occur to the active nest or nesting activities. Construction activities shall be avoided within the buffer, unless otherwise approved by the Cityapproved monitoring biologist (e.g., vehicles could pass through buffer areas while jackhammering would be restricted). Buffers shall be clearly marked and defined to restrict certain activities where they could result in nest failure, and shall remain in place until nests are no longer active, as determined by the City-approved monitoring biologist.

Comment A-12
The comment states that State fully protected species such as the coast horned lizard may not be taken or possessed any time.

Response to Comment A-12
The City of Oxnard understands that a State fully protected species may not be taken or possessed any time. As discussed in Response to Comment A-1, the Project site only includes ornamental landscaping which does not provide suitable habitat for State fully protected species.

Comment A-13
The comment asserts that Project activities may directly impact rare plants and recommends mitigation measures.

Response to Comment A-13
As discussed in Response to Comment A-1, the Project site only contains ornamental landscaping. No rare plants exist on the Project site, and therefore, no mitigation measures related to rare plants are required.

Comment A-14
The comment asserts that Project activities and construction equipment may directly impact wildlife and birds moving through or seeking temporary refuge on site. The comment also recommended mitigation measures to reduce impact on wildlife movement.

Response to Comment A-14
As stated in Response to Comment A-1, the Project site includes ornamental landscaping. The Project site is located within the existing right-of-way of Ventura Road and is physically separated from the Santa Clara River Basin by an existing levee. The construction activities associated with the Project would not directly impact wildlife and birds moving through or seeking temporary refuge on site during the approximately two weeks of construction. The recommended mitigation measures related to wildlife movement are not required. 1536

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-29 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration
Comment A-15
This comment references mitigation measures recommended within the above comments and is provided in the form of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program provided as Attachment A to this comment letter.

Response to Comment A-15
The recommended mitigation measures have been discussed above. As identified in Response to Comment A-11, Mitigation Measures BIO-1 has been modified to address commenter’s comments to further reduce less than significant impacts to nests. Chapter 5 of this Response to Comments Document includes a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as required by CEQA.

Comment A-16
This comment references the filing fee that is required to be paid when the Notice of Determination is filed.

Response to Comment A-16
The City of Oxnard acknowledges that submittal of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife fee along with the filing of the Notice of Determination is required for this Project.

Comment A-17
This comment expresses appreciation for the opportunity to comment on the Project and assist the City in identifying potential impacts to biological resources. The comment also requests an opportunity to review and comment on responses provided by the City.

Response to Comment A-17
The City of Oxnard acknowledges the appreciation. The City has reviewed each of the biological issues that were raised as well as the recommended mitigation measures. As identified above in Response to Comment A-11, the City has modified the bird nest mitigation (Mitigation Measure BIO-1) to further reduce less than significant impacts. The City of Oxnard intends to provide responses to those agencies and organizations that provided comments on the Public Review Draft IS/MND. In addition, when responses are provided, the City of Oxnard will identify the date, time and location of the public hearing that will be held by the City for the Project. 1537
7/29/22, 4:08 PM City of Oxnard Mail - Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2022060700) https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=8839c2507f&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1739536010779077046%7Cmsg-f%3A1739536010779… 1/2 Pearson II, Joe <[email protected]>
Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2022060700)
1 message
Primicerio, Jarod@CHP <[email protected]> Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 12:40 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: CHP-701_AA_Desk <[email protected]>, CHP-EIR <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
The California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Ventura Area office received an Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2022060700) for a proposed digital billboard adjacent to the US-101 Freeway, located within the City of Oxnard. The CHP Ventura Area was requested to evaluate the proposal; specifically, in regard to the potential impact it may have on departmental operations, public safety, increased calls to the communications center/dispatch, increased response times, and traffic congestion.

This proposed digital billboard, coupled with the two additional proposed digital billboards (SCH # 2022060701 and SCH # 2022060706), all adjacent to the US-101 Freeway within the City of Oxnard, will likely cause a drastic increase to traffic congestion already severely impacted in the region. There are currently two digital billboards adjacent to the US-101 Freeway within the City of Oxnard, thus adding three additional, there would be a total of five digital billboards within less than a four mile stretch along this portion of the Freeway. The magnitude of the project may place a greater strain on limited public safety resources with an expected increase in vehicular traffic on US-101. A potential delay of emergency response due to extended response times places the public at risk. The potential increase in traffic may cause an increase in motor services, crashes, and injuries to motorists. Consequently, these incidents will cause an increase in calls to the CHP Ventura Communications Center and dispatchers. The proposed area is currently experiencing significant growth with the construction of retail and residential properties. The digital sign(s) will exacerbate the traffic congestion and may create long-term detrimental impact to the residents, visitors, and first responders within the Ventura Area.

Should you have any questions, please contact Lieutenant Sergio Perez or myself at (805) 662- 2640.

Sincerely,
Jarod Primicerio
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication.

B-1
Comment Letter B
1538

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-31 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration
Comment Letter B: California Highway Patrol – July 27, 2022 Comment B-1
The comment asserts that the proposed Ventura Road Electronic Billboard along with the Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard and potential additional electronic billboards implemented under the proposed Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance could cause a drastic increase in traffic congestion along U.S. 101 within the City of Oxnard. The comment further states that the increase in traffic volumes and congestion on U.S. 101 would result in a potential delay on emergency response and could result in an increase in motor services, crashes, and injuries.

Response to Comment B-1
The implementation of the proposed electronic billboard along Ventura Road as well as additional electronic billboards including the Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard and electronic billboards implemented under the proposed Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance would not result in a substantial amount of traffic. The proposed Ventura Road Electronic Billboard would not generate any employment growth or population growth as discussed in Section 3.13 of the Public Review Draft IS/MND. The implementation of the cumulative electronic billboards would not increase daily operational traffic volumes along U.S. 101. As discussed in Section 3.15 of the Public Review Draft IS/MND, construction activities would generate a nominal number of construction vehicular trips over an approximately twoweek construction period.

The concerns raised in this comment do not appear to be a direct result of implementing electronic billboards, but may result from cumulative development throughout the City of Oxnard. Because the Project would not result in an increase in daily or weekly operational traffic volumes, the Project would not contribute to potential cumulative traffic volume increases resulting from development of additional residential, commercial and other urban uses along U.S. 101 that would contribute to increases in motor services, crashes, and injuries to motorists.

As discussed in Section 3.15 c) in the Public Review Draft IS/MND, the proposed billboard as well as future billboards implemented under the Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance would be required to comply with all applicable laws and regulations concerning brightness, including, without limitation, California Building and Professions Code Section 5403(g) and California Vehicle Code Section 21466.5. The billboard proposes to include different images, but each image will be displayed for at least eight seconds and the images would not move or present the appearance of motion and would not flash or blink or any other means that does not provide a constant illumination. These features associated with the proposed electronic billboard would not substantially increase hazards to drivers along U.S. 101 and less than significant impacts would occur. Furthermore, the Project will require an Outdoor Advertising Act Permit from the California Department of Transportation to ensure that the proposed electronic billboard does not represent a danger to motorists traveling along U.S. 101. 1539
CommentLetterC
C-1
1540
C-1
(Cont)
C-2
C-3
1541
C-3
(Cont)
C-4
C-5
1542
C-6
C-7
C-8
C-9
1543
C-9
(Cont)
1544
C-9
(Cont)
1545
C-9
(Cont)
1546
C-9
(Cont)
C-10
1547
1548

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-41 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration
Comment Letter C: County of Ventura Resources Management Agency, Planning Division – July 29, 2022
Comment C-1
This comment states that the Planning Division reviewed three separate Mitigated Negative Declaration (MNDs) related to proposed Ventura Road Electronic Billboard, potential additional electronic billboards implemented under the proposed Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance and Riverpark Boulevard Electronic Billboard. The comment specifically states that the proposed Ventura Road Electronic Billboard would be located near a wildlife habitat corridor that lies in the Santa Clara Riverbed and may have direct and cumulative impacts on sensitive habitat in the County’s jurisdiction.

Response to Comment C-1
The potential Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Project impacts to biological resources associated with construction and operational activities are discussed in Section 3.4 of the Public Review Draft IS/MND. As discussed, the proposed construction activities would be located outside of the existing Santa Clara River Basin and physically separated from the Basin by the existing levee that borders the eastern edge of the Basin. The Project site is located within the existing right-of-way of Ventura Road. The Project site currently contains ornamental landscaping. The analysis identifies potential impacts to birds during the nesting season and includes mitigation measures to reduce the potential impacts to less than significant (see Response to Comment A-11 for a modification to the nesting season identified in Mitigation Measure BIO-1). An operational lighting study was conducted and modifications to the design of the electronic billboard have been incorporated into the Project so that the maximum illuminance from the electronic billboard at the edge of the willow riparian habitat would be less than 0.2 foot candles. Based on recommendations from the International Commission on Illumination (CIE).

The CIE identifies impacts on natural areas as an illuminance of 0.2 foot-candle (fc) or greater.

Therefore, due to the absence of a current local illumination standard impact on natural areas, a significant light impact on adjacent natural areas and associated species would occur if light level increases are 0.2 fc or greater. Because the increase in light level would be less than 0.2 fc, the Project would result in a less than significant lighting impact on the existing sensitive willow riparian habitat area or associated species.

The cumulative impact of implementing the proposed electronic billboard within the existing Ventura Road right-of-way, the proposed electronic billboard along Riverpark Boulevard, and the adoption of an ordinance to allow additional electronic billboards along U.S. 101 but separated by at least 2,000 feet in distance is discussed in Section 3.18 b) of the Public Review Draft IS/MND.

As discussed, the proposed Project could result in potential significant impacts related to biological resources, cultural resources, and noise on wildlife species prior to the implementation of mitigation measures. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-2, CR-1, and CR-2, the potential impacts associated with the Project would be reduced to less than significant. Given that the potential related billboard projects would need to occur at least 2,000 1549

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-42 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
feet from the Project site, and the Project impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, and noise on wildlife species are site specific and would not combine with potential impacts associated with other electronic billboards implemented along U.S. 101, the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts would be considered less than cumulatively considerable and less than significant.

Comment C-2
This comment asserts that evaluating the cumulative impacts of the three projects that are addressed within the three separate Public Review Draft IS/MNDs is difficult and recommends that the City consolidates its review into one environmental document.

Response to Comment C-2
The potential effects resulting from the Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance is evaluated at a Program-level and as each individual electronic billboard project is proposed, a project-level environmental evaluation will be required. The Riverpark Boulevard and Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Projects are evaluated at a Project-level, and specific impacts and applicable mitigation measures are provided in their respective Public Review Draft IS/MND. As stated in Response to Comment C-1, a discussion of cumulative impacts is provided for each Public Review Draft IS/MND in Section 3.18 b). The City thanks the County for their input, but will proceed with the separate IS/MNDs for the program and two specific projects.

Comment C-3
This comment states that an analysis of potential environmental impacts to unincorporated areas such as the El Rio/Del Norte and Nyeland Acres communities and sensitive biological resources adjacent to and in the vicinity of the proposed Project should be evaluated.

The comment also requests amendments to the draft Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance.

Response to Comment C-3
The Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Project is not located in the vicinity of the El Rio/Del Norte and Nyeland Acres communities, and therefore, the implementation of the Project would not result in impacts to these communities. The Project site is located near the Santa Clara River Basin which includes biological resources and is an unincorporated area of the County. As discussed in Response to Comment C-1, potential significant impacts associated with the implementation of the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Project could occur to biological resources, cultural resources, and noise on wildlife species prior to the implementation of mitigation measures. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-2, CR-1, and CR-2, the potential impacts associated with the Project would be reduced to less than significant.

Given that the potential related billboard projects (i.e., Riverpark Electronic Billboard and additional electronic billboards implemented as part of the Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance) would need to occur at least 2,000 feet from the Project site, and the 1550

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-43 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration
Project impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, and noise on wildlife species are site specific and would not combine with potential impacts associated with other electronic billboards implemented along U.S. 101, the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts would be considered less than cumulatively considerable and less than significant.

This comment’s recommended amendments to the Billboards Ordinance are not pertinent to the proposed Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Project. The Project’s specific potential impacts are evaluated in the Public Review Draft IS/MND.

Comment C-4
This comment references the proposed Ordinance and requests setbacks.

Response to Comment C-4
Because this comment references the proposed Ordinance, it does not provide a specific comment on the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Public Review Draft IS/MND.

Comment C-5
This comment references the proposed Ordinance and requests more specific information on maximum heights.

Response to Comment C-5
Because this comment references the proposed Ordinance, it does not provide a specific comment on the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Public Review Draft IS/MND.

Comment C-6
This comment references the proposed Ordinance and requests more specific information on limiting the number of billboards.

Response to Comment C-6
Because this comment references the proposed Ordinance, it does not provide a specific comment on the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Public Review Draft IS/MND.

Comment C-7
This comment asserts that the City should take into consideration how the ordinance and proposed billboards would affect disadvantage communities and how public benefits will be provided to affected disadvantage communities
Response to Comment C-7
The El Rio/Del Norte and Nyeland Acres communities are within the jurisdiction of the County of Ventura. These communities are outside of the City of Oxnard. Potential impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Project would not 1551

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-44 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
impact these communities because the Project site is located more than one mile from the El Rio/Del Norte community and more than 3 miles from the Nyeland Acres community.

Comment C-8
This comment asserts that all County and City applications for discretionary permits and all environmental documents for Projects should be sent to the Board of Supervisor’s Office for transmittal to the El Rio/Del Norte Municipal Advisory Council.

Response to Comment C-8
A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was mailed to the County of Ventura for distribution. Potential impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Project would not impact El Rio/Del Norte community because the Project site is located approximately one mile from this unincorporated community.

Comment C-9
This comment addresses evaluations of scenic resources and biological resources provided in the Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance Public Review Draft IS/MND.

Response to Comment C-9
This comment does not address contents within the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Public Review Draft IS/MND. Therefore, no further response is required.

Comment C-10
This comment thanks the City for providing an opportunity to comment on the three Public Review Draft IS/MNDs for the proposed Ordinance and the electronic billboard projects. The County reiterated the request to provide the environmental documentation for the IS/MNDs into one environmental document.

Response to Comment C-10
As discussed in Response to Comment C-2, the potential effects resulting from the Freeway Adjacent Digital Display Billboards Ordinance is evaluated at a Program-level and as each individual electronic billboard project is proposed, a project-level environmental evaluation will be required. The Riverpark Boulevard and Ventura Road Electronic Billboard Projects are evaluated at a Project-level, and specific impacts and applicable mitigation measures are provided in their respective Public Review Draft IS/MND. The City thanks the County for their input, but will proceed with the separate IS/MNDs for the program and two specific projects. 1552
8/8/22, 11:53 AM City of Oxnard Mail - FW: Ventura County Agency Comments for Proposed Billboard Ordinance & Projects https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=8839c2507f&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1739729003118264233%7Cmsg-f%3A17397290031182… 1/2 Pearson II, Joe <[email protected]>
FW: Ventura County Agency Comments for Proposed Billboard Ordinance & Projects
1 message
Ciuffetelli, Anthony <[email protected]> Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:47 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Good Afternoon,
Attached to this e-mail are the following comments regarding the proposed ordinance and projects:
- VC Air Pollution Control District (Ordinance & projects) -VC Watershed Protection District (Ventura rd project)
Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this submission. Responses to these comments should be sent directly to the commenter with a copy to me. Additional comments are expected from the VC Planning Division and will be sent directly from staff.

Regards,
Anthony Ciuffetelli
Ventura County Planning Division
Planning Programs
(805)654-2443
4 attachments
Comment Letter D
1553
8/8/22, 11:53 AM City of Oxnard Mail - FW: Ventura County Agency Comments for Proposed Billboard Ordinance & Projects https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=8839c2507f&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1739729003118264233%7Cmsg-f%3A17397290031182… 2/2 RMA 22-018_APCD.pdf
152K
RMA 22-019_APCD.pdf
149K
RMA 22-020_APCD.pdf
149K
RMA 22-020_WPD.pdf
316K
1554
Comment Letter D
D-1
1555

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-48 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Comment Letter D: County of Ventura Resources Management Agency, Watershed Protection District – July 29, 2022
Comment D-1
This comment states that permits are required for activities in, on, over, under, or across a jurisdictional red-line channel or within District right-of-way.

Response to Comment D-1
Because the Project is located on a site that is within the City of Oxnard and within the Ventura Road right-of-way as well as physically separated from the Santa Clara River Basin by the existing levee, the Project would not encroach upon jurisdictional channels or within District right-of-way. Therefore, a permit from the Watershed Protection District is not required for the Project.
1556

VENTURA COUNTY

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
Memorandum
TO: Joe Pearson II, Sr. Planner, City of Oxnard DATE: July 26, 2022 FROM: Nicole Collazo, Air Quality Specialist, Planning Division SUBJECT: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard (RMA 22-020)
Air Pollution Control District (APCD) staff have reviewed the subject mitigated negative declaration (MND) of the Ventura Road Electronic Billboard project (project). The proposed project includes a request for approval of a Special Use Permit for the installation and operation of an LED electronic billboard. The electronic billboard would include a digital display of advertisements of various businesses, activities, services or products. The project is located on the north side of the U.S. 101 and immediately west of Ventura Road. The Lead Agency is the City of Oxnard. APCD submits the following comments for the project’s MND.

GENERAL COMMENTS
Air Quality Section
1) Item a, Page 17. VCOG is no longer responsible for developing the AQMP. This is language contained in our 2003 Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines and no longer applies.

The AQMP is developed by the APCD using SCAG’s population growth forecasts in its air quality modeling and forecasting. We recommend amending this section. We also note that our 2022 AQMP is currently in development and scheduled to be adopted at the end of 2022.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the project’s MND. If you have any questions, you may contact me at [email protected].

E-1
Comment Letter E
1557

3. Responses to Comments
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 3-50 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Comment Letter E: Ventura County Air Pollution Control District – July 26, 2022
Comment E-1
This comment states that the Ventura Council of Governments (VCOG) no longer responsible for developing the Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan (VCAQMP) but Ventura County APCD is responsible.

Response to Comment E-1
The City of Oxnard thanks the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District in clarifying that the VCOG no longer provides forecasted regional population, housing, and employment for the VCAQMP.

The fourth sentence of the first paragraph 0n page 17 is revised as follows:

VCAPCD and the Ventura Council Association of Governments (VCOG) are is responsible for preparing the air quality management plan (AQMP), which addresses federal and state Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.

The second paragraph on page 17 of the Public Review Draft IS/MND is revised as follows:

The proposed Project is located within the Ventura County portion of the SCCAB, which is under the jurisdiction of the VCAPCD for air quality planning and control. As such, VCAPCD’s 2016 AQMP is the applicable air quality plan for the proposed Project.

Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by the VCAPCD VCOG are deemed consistent with the AQMP growth projections, since the forecast assumptions by VCAPCD VCOG forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP. Additionally, because VCAPCD’s VCOG’s regional growth forecasts are based upon, among other things, land uses designated in general plans, a project that is consistent with the land use designated in a general plan would also be consistent with the VCAPCD’s VCOG’s regional forecast projections, and thus also with the AQMP growth projections. 1558
Ventura Road Electronic Billboard 4-1 ESA / 202000387.02 Response to Comments on Public Review Draft October 2022 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
CHAPTER 4
Errata
The following text changes are made to the Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Public Review Draft IS/MND) and incorporated as part of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final IS/MND). These changes are minor and do not alter the conclusions of the Public Review Draft IS/MND. Changes to the text are noted with underline (for added text) or strikeout (for deleted text).