Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 707
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.1000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
5.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.3000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4587
0.4587
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.4590
Total
2.1000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
5.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.3000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4587
0.4587
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.4590
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1324
293.1324
0.0702
0.0000
294.8881
Total
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1324
293.1324
0.0702
0.0000
294.8881
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 708
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0527
1.6961
0.4580
4.5500e-
003
0.1140
3.1800e-
003
0.1171
0.0329
3.0400e-
003
0.0359
0.0000
441.9835
441.9835
0.0264
0.0000
442.6435
Worker
0.3051
0.2164
2.5233
7.3500e-
003
0.7557
6.2300e-
003
0.7619
0.2007
5.7400e-
003
0.2065
0.0000
663.9936
663.9936
0.0187
0.0000
664.4604
Total
0.3578
1.9125
2.9812
0.0119
0.8696
9.4100e-
003
0.8790
0.2336
8.7800e-
003
0.2424
0.0000
1,105.977
1 1,105.977
1 0.0451
0.0000
1,107.103
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1321
293.1321
0.0702
0.0000
294.8877
Total
0.2158
1.9754
2.0700
3.4100e-
003
0.1023
0.1023
0.0963
0.0963
0.0000
293.1321
293.1321
0.0702
0.0000
294.8877
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 709
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0527
1.6961
0.4580
4.5500e-
003
0.1140
3.1800e-
003
0.1171
0.0329
3.0400e-
003
0.0359
0.0000
441.9835
441.9835
0.0264
0.0000
442.6435
Worker
0.3051
0.2164
2.5233
7.3500e-
003
0.7557
6.2300e-
003
0.7619
0.2007
5.7400e-
003
0.2065
0.0000
663.9936
663.9936
0.0187
0.0000
664.4604
Total
0.3578
1.9125
2.9812
0.0119
0.8696
9.4100e-
003
0.8790
0.2336
8.7800e-
003
0.2424
0.0000
1,105.977
1 1,105.977
1 0.0451
0.0000
1,107.103
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2789
286.2789
0.0681
0.0000
287.9814
Total
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2789
286.2789
0.0681
0.0000
287.9814
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 710
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0382
1.2511
0.4011
4.3000e-
003
0.1113
1.4600e-
003
0.1127
0.0321
1.4000e-
003
0.0335
0.0000
417.9930
417.9930
0.0228
0.0000
418.5624
Worker
0.2795
0.1910
2.2635
6.9100e-
003
0.7377
5.9100e-
003
0.7436
0.1960
5.4500e-
003
0.2014
0.0000
624.5363
624.5363
0.0164
0.0000
624.9466
Total
0.3177
1.4420
2.6646
0.0112
0.8490
7.3700e-
003
0.8564
0.2281
6.8500e-
003
0.2349
0.0000
1,042.529
4 1,042.529
4 0.0392
0.0000
1,043.509
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2785
286.2785
0.0681
0.0000
287.9811
Total
0.1942
1.7765
2.0061
3.3300e-
003
0.0864
0.0864
0.0813
0.0813
0.0000
286.2785
286.2785
0.0681
0.0000
287.9811
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 711
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0382
1.2511
0.4011
4.3000e-
003
0.1113
1.4600e-
003
0.1127
0.0321
1.4000e-
003
0.0335
0.0000
417.9930
417.9930
0.0228
0.0000
418.5624
Worker
0.2795
0.1910
2.2635
6.9100e-
003
0.7377
5.9100e-
003
0.7436
0.1960
5.4500e-
003
0.2014
0.0000
624.5363
624.5363
0.0164
0.0000
624.9466
Total
0.3177
1.4420
2.6646
0.0112
0.8490
7.3700e-
003
0.8564
0.2281
6.8500e-
003
0.2349
0.0000
1,042.529
4 1,042.529
4 0.0392
0.0000
1,043.509
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 712
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Total
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
6.7100e-
003
0.0663
0.0948
1.5000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
3.3200e-
003
3.0500e-
003
3.0500e-
003
0.0000
13.0175
13.0175
4.2100e-
003
0.0000
13.1227
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 713
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Total
2.8000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.6156
0.6156
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.6160
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 714
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Total
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 715
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Total
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
4.1372
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1600e-
003
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Total
4.1404
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 716
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Total
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
4.1372
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1600e-
003
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Total
4.1404
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 717
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Total
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 718
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 Unmitigated
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 719
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 720
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 721
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494
2.2000e-
003
0.0188
8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000
21.7988
21.7988
4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704
0.6018
0.2561
3.8400e-
003
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0000
696.9989
696.9989
0.0134
0.0128
701.1408
General Office
Building
468450
2.5300e-
003
0.0230
0.0193
1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000
24.9983
24.9983
4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448
0.4072
0.3421
2.4400e-
003
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0000
443.3124
443.3124
8.5000e-
003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel
1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853
0.0717
5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000
92.9036
92.9036
1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905
0.0760
5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000
98.5139
98.5139
1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840
5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
4.9009
4.9009
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 722
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494
2.2000e-
003
0.0188
8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000
21.7988
21.7988
4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704
0.6018
0.2561
3.8400e-
003
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0000
696.9989
696.9989
0.0134
0.0128
701.1408
General Office
Building
468450
2.5300e-
003
0.0230
0.0193
1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000
24.9983
24.9983
4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448
0.4072
0.3421
2.4400e-
003
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0000
443.3124
443.3124
8.5000e-
003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel
1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853
0.0717
5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000
92.9036
92.9036
1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905
0.0760
5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000
98.5139
98.5139
1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840
5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
4.9009
4.9009
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 723
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010
33.7770
1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519
0.0107
1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550
186.2502
7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022
0.0209
4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel
550308
175.3399
7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120
112.5116
4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000
240.8778
9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total
2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 724
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010
33.7770
1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519
0.0107
1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550
186.2502
7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022
0.0209
4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel
550308
175.3399
7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120
112.5116
4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000
240.8778
9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total
2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 725
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Unmitigated
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3998
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0206
0.1763
0.0750
1.1200e-
003
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0000
204.1166
204.1166
3.9100e-
003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping
0.3096
0.1187
10.3054
5.4000e-
004
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0000
16.8504
16.8504
0.0161
0.0000
17.2540
Total
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6600e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 726
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3998
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0206
0.1763
0.0750
1.1200e-
003
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0000
204.1166
204.1166
3.9100e-
003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping
0.3096
0.1187
10.3054
5.4000e-
004
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0000
16.8504
16.8504
0.0161
0.0000
17.2540
Total
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6600e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 727
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Unmitigated
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 728
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095
0.0535
1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719
2.0867
0.0523
493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719
0.2627
6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702
0.3580
8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel
1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633
0.0416
1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934
0.0796
1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250
0.1363
3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 729
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095
0.0535
1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719
2.0867
0.0523
493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719
0.2627
6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702
0.3580
8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel
1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633
0.0416
1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934
0.0796
1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250
0.1363
3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 730
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Unmitigated
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 731
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344
0.1380
0.0000
5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5
91.0415
5.3804
0.0000
225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952
0.5021
0.0000
21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4
86.9613
5.1393
0.0000
215.4430
Hotel
27.38 5.5579
0.3285
0.0000
13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818
0.0876
0.0000
3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359
0.7054
0.0000
29.5706
Total
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 732
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344
0.1380
0.0000
5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5
91.0415
5.3804
0.0000
225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952
0.5021
0.0000
21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4
86.9613
5.1393
0.0000
215.4430
Hotel
27.38 5.5579
0.3285
0.0000
13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818
0.0876
0.0000
3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359
0.7054
0.0000
29.5706
Total
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 733
11.0 Vegetation
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 734
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
45.00 1000sqft
1.03 45,000.00
0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
36.00 1000sqft
0.83 36,000.00
0 Hotel
50.00 Room
1.67 72,600.00
0 Quality Restaurant
8.00 1000sqft
0.18 8,000.00
0 Apartments Low Rise
25.00 Dwelling Unit
1.56 25,000.00
72 Apartments Mid Rise
975.00
Dwelling Unit
25.66 975,000.00
2789
Regional Shopping Center
56.00 1000sqft
1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2028
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44
0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 735
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
NumberWood
1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
158.37
79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 736
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
131.84
78.27 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
127.15
65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 737
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2561
46.4415
31.4494
0.0636
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,163.416
6 6,163.416
6 1.9475
0.0000
6,212.103
9 2022
4.5441
38.8811
40.8776
0.1240
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 2023
4.1534
25.7658
38.7457
0.1206
7.0088
0.7592
7.7679
1.8799
0.7136
2.5935
0.0000
12,150.48
90 12,150.48
90 0.9589
0.0000
12,174.46
15 2024
237.0219
9.5478
14.9642
0.0239
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,313.180
8 2,313.180
8 0.7166
0.0000
2,331.095
6 Maximum
237.0219
46.4415
40.8776
0.1240
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 738
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2561
46.4415
31.4494
0.0636
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,163.416
6 6,163.416
6 1.9475
0.0000
6,212.103
9 2022
4.5441
38.8811
40.8776
0.1240
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 2023
4.1534
25.7658
38.7457
0.1206
7.0088
0.7592
7.7679
1.8799
0.7136
2.5935
0.0000
12,150.48
90 12,150.48
90 0.9589
0.0000
12,174.46
15 2024
237.0219
9.5478
14.9642
0.0239
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,313.180
8 2,313.180
8 0.7166
0.0000
2,331.095
5 Maximum
237.0219
46.4415
40.8776
0.1240
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 739
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Total
41.1168
67.2262
207.5497
0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
16 76,811.18
16 2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
86 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Total
41.1168
67.2262
207.5497
0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
16 76,811.18
16 2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
86 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 740
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
9/1/2021
10/12/2021
5 30
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
10/13/2021
11/9/2021
5 20
3 Grading
Grading
11/10/2021
1/11/2022
5 45
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
1/12/2022
12/12/2023
5 500
5 Paving
Paving
12/13/2023
1/30/2024
5 35
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024
5 35
OffRoad Equipment
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
±
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 741
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367
0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 742
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00
0.00 458.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 801.00
143.00
0.00 10.00
6.90 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 160.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 743
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1273
4.0952
0.9602
0.0119
0.2669
0.0126
0.2795
0.0732
0.0120
0.0852
1,292.241
3 1,292.241
3 0.0877
1,294.433
7 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0487
0.0313
0.4282
1.1800e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
117.2799
117.2799
3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total
0.1760
4.1265
1.3884
0.0131
0.3810
0.0135
0.3946
0.1034
0.0129
0.1163
1,409.521
2 1,409.521
2 0.0912
1,411.801
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 744
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1273
4.0952
0.9602
0.0119
0.2669
0.0126
0.2795
0.0732
0.0120
0.0852
1,292.241
3 1,292.241
3 0.0877
1,294.433
7 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0487
0.0313
0.4282
1.1800e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
117.2799
117.2799
3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total
0.1760
4.1265
1.3884
0.0131
0.3810
0.0135
0.3946
0.1034
0.0129
0.1163
1,409.521
2 1,409.521
2 0.0912
1,411.801
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 745
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 746
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 747
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 748
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 749
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 750
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 751
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4079
13.2032
3.4341
0.0364
0.9155
0.0248
0.9404
0.2636
0.0237
0.2873
3,896.548
2 3,896.548
2 0.2236
3,902.138
4 Worker
2.4299
1.5074
21.0801
0.0607
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
6,042.558
5 6,042.558
5 0.1697
6,046.800
0 Total
2.8378
14.7106
24.5142
0.0971
7.0087
0.0741
7.0828
1.8799
0.0691
1.9490
9,939.106
7 9,939.106
7 0.3933
9,948.938
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 752
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4079
13.2032
3.4341
0.0364
0.9155
0.0248
0.9404
0.2636
0.0237
0.2873
3,896.548
2 3,896.548
2 0.2236
3,902.138
4 Worker
2.4299
1.5074
21.0801
0.0607
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
6,042.558
5 6,042.558
5 0.1697
6,046.800
0 Total
2.8378
14.7106
24.5142
0.0971
7.0087
0.0741
7.0828
1.8799
0.0691
1.9490
9,939.106
7 9,939.106
7 0.3933
9,948.938
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 753
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3027
10.0181
3.1014
0.0352
0.9156
0.0116
0.9271
0.2636
0.0111
0.2747
3,773.876
2 3,773.876
2 0.1982
3,778.830
0 Worker
2.2780
1.3628
19.4002
0.0584
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,821.402
8 5,821.402
8 0.1529
5,825.225
4 Total
2.5807
11.3809
22.5017
0.0936
7.0088
0.0595
7.0682
1.8799
0.0552
1.9350
9,595.279
0 9,595.279
0 0.3511
9,604.055
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 754
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3027
10.0181
3.1014
0.0352
0.9156
0.0116
0.9271
0.2636
0.0111
0.2747
3,773.876
2 3,773.876
2 0.1982
3,778.830
0 Worker
2.2780
1.3628
19.4002
0.0584
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,821.402
8 5,821.402
8 0.1529
5,825.225
4 Total
2.5807
11.3809
22.5017
0.0936
7.0088
0.0595
7.0682
1.8799
0.0552
1.9350
9,595.279
0 9,595.279
0 0.3511
9,604.055
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 755
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 756
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 757
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 758
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 759
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Total
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 760
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Total
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 761
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Unmitigated
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 762
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 763
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 764
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4769.72
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5057.75
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
251.616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 765
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4.76972
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5.05775
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 766
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 767
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 768
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 769
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
45.00 1000sqft
1.03 45,000.00
0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
36.00 1000sqft
0.83 36,000.00
0 Hotel
50.00 Room
1.67 72,600.00
0 Quality Restaurant
8.00 1000sqft
0.18 8,000.00
0 Apartments Low Rise
25.00 Dwelling Unit
1.56 25,000.00
72 Apartments Mid Rise
975.00
Dwelling Unit
25.66 975,000.00
2789
Regional Shopping Center
56.00 1000sqft
1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2028
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44
0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 770
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
NumberWood
1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
158.37
79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 771
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
131.84
78.27 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
127.15
65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 772
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2621
46.4460
31.4068
0.0635
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,154.337
7 6,154.337
7 1.9472
0.0000
6,203.018
6 2022
4.7966
38.8851
39.6338
0.1195
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 2023
4.3939
25.8648
37.5031
0.1162
7.0088
0.7598
7.7685
1.8799
0.7142
2.5940
0.0000
11,710.40
80 11,710.40
80 0.9617
0.0000
11,734.44
97 2024
237.0656
9.5503
14.9372
0.0238
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,307.051
7 2,307.051
7 0.7164
0.0000
2,324.962
7 Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 773
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2621
46.4460
31.4068
0.0635
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,154.337
7 6,154.337
7 1.9472
0.0000
6,203.018
6 2022
4.7966
38.8851
39.6338
0.1195
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 2023
4.3939
25.8648
37.5031
0.1162
7.0088
0.7598
7.7685
1.8799
0.7142
2.5940
0.0000
11,710.40
80 11,710.40
80 0.9617
0.0000
11,734.44
97 2024
237.0656
9.5503
14.9372
0.0238
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,307.051
7 2,307.051
7 0.7164
0.0000
2,324.962
7 Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 774
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Total
40.7912
67.7872
202.7424
0.6043
45.9592
2.4640
48.4231
12.2950
2.4399
14.7349
0.0000
74,422.37
87 74,422.37
87 2.8429
0.4832
74,637.44
17 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Total
40.7912
67.7872
202.7424
0.6043
45.9592
2.4640
48.4231
12.2950
2.4399
14.7349
0.0000
74,422.37
87 74,422.37
87 2.8429
0.4832
74,637.44
17 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 775
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
9/1/2021
10/12/2021
5 30
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
10/13/2021
11/9/2021
5 20
3 Grading
Grading
11/10/2021
1/11/2022
5 45
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
1/12/2022
12/12/2023
5 500
5 Paving
Paving
12/13/2023
1/30/2024
5 35
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024
5 35
OffRoad Equipment
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
±
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 776
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367
0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 777
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00
0.00 458.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 801.00
143.00
0.00 10.00
6.90 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 160.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 778
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1304
4.1454
1.0182
0.0117
0.2669
0.0128
0.2797
0.0732
0.0122
0.0854
1,269.855
5 1,269.855
5 0.0908
1,272.125
2 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0532
0.0346
0.3963
1.1100e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
110.4707
110.4707
3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
2 1,380.326
2 0.0941
1,382.679
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 779
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1304
4.1454
1.0182
0.0117
0.2669
0.0128
0.2797
0.0732
0.0122
0.0854
1,269.855
5 1,269.855
5 0.0908
1,272.125
2 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0532
0.0346
0.3963
1.1100e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
110.4707
110.4707
3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
2 1,380.326
2 0.0941
1,382.679
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 780
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 781
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 782
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 783
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 784
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 785
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 786
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4284
13.1673
3.8005
0.0354
0.9155
0.0256
0.9412
0.2636
0.0245
0.2881
3,789.075
0 3,789.075
0 0.2381
3,795.028
3 Worker
2.6620
1.6677
19.4699
0.0571
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
5,691.935
4 5,691.935
4 0.1602
5,695.940
8 Total
3.0904
14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
4 9,481.010
4 0.3984
9,490.969
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 787
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4284
13.1673
3.8005
0.0354
0.9155
0.0256
0.9412
0.2636
0.0245
0.2881
3,789.075
0 3,789.075
0 0.2381
3,795.028
3 Worker
2.6620
1.6677
19.4699
0.0571
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
5,691.935
4 5,691.935
4 0.1602
5,695.940
8 Total
3.0904
14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
4 9,481.010
4 0.3984
9,490.969
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 788
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3183
9.9726
3.3771
0.0343
0.9156
0.0122
0.9277
0.2636
0.0116
0.2752
3,671.400
7 3,671.400
7 0.2096
3,676.641
7 Worker
2.5029
1.5073
17.8820
0.0550
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,483.797
4 5,483.797
4 0.1442
5,487.402
0 Total
2.8211
11.4799
21.2591
0.0893
7.0088
0.0601
7.0688
1.8799
0.0557
1.9356
9,155.198
1 9,155.198
1 0.3538
9,164.043
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 789
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3183
9.9726
3.3771
0.0343
0.9156
0.0122
0.9277
0.2636
0.0116
0.2752
3,671.400
7 3,671.400
7 0.2096
3,676.641
7 Worker
2.5029
1.5073
17.8820
0.0550
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,483.797
4 5,483.797
4 0.1442
5,487.402
0 Total
2.8211
11.4799
21.2591
0.0893
7.0088
0.0601
7.0688
1.8799
0.0557
1.9356
9,155.198
1 9,155.198
1 0.3538
9,164.043
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 790
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 791
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 792
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 793
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 794
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Total
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 795
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Total
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 796
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Unmitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 797
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 798
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 799
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4769.72
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5057.75
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
251.616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 800
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4.76972
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5.05775
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 801
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 802
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 803
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 804
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 120.77
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 100.80
% Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
Local Hire Provision Net Change
With Local Hire Provision
Without Local Hire Provision
Attachment C
805
EXHIBIT B
806
SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 June 2019
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist
Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.
M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.
B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.
Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.
Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling operations, oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, and many other industrial and agricultural sources. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities.
Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at dozens of sites and has testified as an expert witness on more than ten cases involving exposure to air contaminants from industrial sources.
807
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 June 2019
Professional History:
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist
Publications:
Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48
Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.
Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.
Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.
Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.
808
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 June 2019
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.
Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.
Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.
Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.
Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.
Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.
Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.
809
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 June 2019
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.
Presentations:
Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.
Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.
Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
810
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 June 2019
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.
Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.
Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.
Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.
811
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 June 2019
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.
Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.
Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.
812
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 June 2019
Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Teaching Experience:
UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.
National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.
National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.
California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.
UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.
University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.
U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.
Academic Grants Awarded:
California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.
Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.
Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.
Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.
King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.
Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
813
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 June 2019
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.
Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case: No 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
814
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 June 2019
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.
Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.
Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants.
Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014
815
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 June 2019
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.
Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant.
Case 3:10-cv-00622
Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013
In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland
Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013
816
EXHIBIT C
817
1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa
Santa Monica, California 90401
Tel: (949) 887‐9013
Email: [email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
G
eologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
CEQA Review
Education:
M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.
Professional Certifications:
California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:
Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.
Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques.
Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2014; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); 818
• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:
With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
• Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.
• Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
2 819
• Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 3 820
• Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
4 821
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.
Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 822
Geology:
With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
6 823
Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.
7 824
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 825
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009‐ 2011.
9 826
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Fwd: [Ask Planning Action] Regarding Agenda Item 5, April 18 Community Workshop Lai, Dee <[email protected]> Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:07 AM To: "Dobrowalski, Jay" <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Pearson II <[email protected]>
Regards,
Dee Lai | Administrative Secretary III
Community Development Department, Planning Division
214 S C Street | Oxnard, CA 93030
O: 805.385.7878
www.oxnard.org
We welcome you back to the Service Center!
The Community Development service counter has reopened to the public from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday and 9 a.m.-4 p.m. on alternating Fridays.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: 'Mike Beda' via Planning <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:04 AM
Subject: [Ask Planning Action] Regarding Agenda Item 5, April 18 Community Workshop To: <[email protected]>
To Whom It May Concern:
Regarding Agenda Item 5, Project name: Teal Club Specific Plan, I would like to say: No, please God, not that.
Allow me to elaborate.
This is already a very crowded area. The traffic, especially on Ventura and Victoria roads, is horrible. Adding 990 residential units will introduce at least 2,000 more cars to our roads every day. In addition to the congestion, the traffic noise alone would affect pretty much the entire Fremont neighborhood.
Obviously somebody (nobody I know) stands to make hundreds of millions from this project. But anyone who cares about those of us who already live here would not allow this development to go forward.
Thank you for your time,
Michael Beda
214 North J Street.
Oxnard
827
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Fwd: [Ask Planning Action] AGENDA ITEM N0. 5 TEAL CLUB SPECIFIC PLAN Mancha,Salvador <[email protected]> Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 9:26 AM To: Jay Dobrowalski <[email protected]>
From: Paul Giacobbe [email protected]
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Giacobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 1:00 PM
Subject: [Ask Planning Action] AGENDA ITEM N0. 5 TEAL CLUB SPECIFIC PLAN To: <[email protected]>
Encl: LA Tmes Article of 23 August 1997 – Plane Crash At Field Near Oxnard Airport
The farmland selected for this project is between Doris Avenue and Teal Club Road and between Patterson Road and Ventura Road. It is in the buffer zone of the Oxnard Airport and is potentially a dangerous place for a housing development. Most aircraft accidents occur on landings and takeoffs. The proposed location is too close to farmland where pesticides are used.
In addition, the development will cause a major traffic problem.
AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS:
In August of 1997 there was a plane crash in this area (see enclosure). A plane sheared off the chimney of a house on Ivanhoe Ave. It then slammed into a cement light pole on Doris Avenue ripping off a wing. The wing landed on the street bursting into flames. The plane crashed into the field across the street; the proposed site of the residential project. It is noted that the plane was in trouble and was making a beeline to the Oxnard Airport. It was not in the airport flight path. Because the project is not in the flight path does not mean there is no danger. Three people were injured in this accident. Of the three two were seriously injured.
An article appeared in the Ventura County Star on 2 September 2015. Edwards Air Force Base conducted navigation approach testing, with F-35 fighter jets, between Oxnard Airport and Point Mugu. Because of their proximity to each other, this is the only place on the West Coast that this testing can be accomplished. Military jets have crashed and destroyed homes in the San Diego area in the resent past. On 8 January 2009 an F-18 fighter jet crashed in flames in a San Diego neighborhood. Two people were killed on the ground and three homes were destroyed.
The Ventura County Star, on 5 May 2019, reported an aircraft accident. One person was injured when a helicopter crashed near the Oxnard Airport. The crash was close to the Duda Nursery at Victoria Avenue and Teal Club Road. The aircraft burst into flames when it hit the ground and set off a grass fire.
828
There was an account of an aircraft mishap, on 11 January 2021, in the Ventura County Star. A plane had taken off from the Oxnard Airport. The pilot turned back when the engine started to fail. Before he could reach the runway, the pilot was forced to make an emergency landing at Fifth Street near Victoria Avenue. There were no injuries.
AGRICULTURAL CONTAMINATION:
Pesticides, such as herbicides, insecticides and fumigants, are applied to the crops at the agricultural field near the proposed housing project. These pesticides are used to control weeds, harmful insects and plant diseases. Sprayed pesticide can drift and have a negative impact on the folks living in the new development. Possible long-term effects can be cancer, neurological disorders, reproductive problems, birth defects and infertility. Even low level pesticide exposure, over time, can lead to these chronic health problem. The proposed residential units are too close to the farmland to prevent agricultural contamination.
TRAFFIC PROBLEMS:
I believe a city needs slow, sustained growth to prosper. As stated above, the Teal Club project will include 990 single-family and multi-family residential units. Each home will probably have at least two cars. That would put, approximately, another 2,000 vehicles on the road. The plan will have a negative impact on our community because of excessive traffic. The proposal does not widen Doris Avenue and Teal Club Road. This will be a nightmare for everyone living here.
Yours truly,
Paul Giacobbe
--
Salvador Mancha
Department Administration Technician
Community Development Department
214 S C Street | Oxnard, CA 93030
805-385-7884
www.oxnard.org/development
LA Times-Oxnard Airport Plane Crash.docx
20K
829
2 Men Seriously Hurt When Plane CrashesInto Field
Aviation: A third man receives minor injuries after thesingle-prop Cessna, on an instructional flight, fails to makean emergency landing at Oxnard Airport.
August 23, 1997|DAWN HOBBS and SCOTT HADLY | SPECIALTO THE TIMES OXNARD — Two men suffered lacerations and broken bones when their single-propellerCessna clipped a house and crashed into a lima bean field Friday afternoon as they attempted anemergency landing at the Oxnard Airport.
A third man suffered minor injuries.
"We were talking in the living room and playing Nintendo, then we heard this big boom and thehouse shook like a big earthquake," said Julie Plascencia, 14, who was in the two-story beigehome. "I was too scared to think about what it was." The plane, on an instructional flight out of Camarillo Airport, apparently suffered engine failurebefore it sheared off the top of a chimney and some red roof tiles on the house on IvanhoeAvenue about 2:30 p.m.
The Cessna 210 then slammed into a cement light pole across the street on Doris Avenue, rippingoff a wing and crashing into the bean field just steps away from farm workers. The wing leftbehind in the street burst into flames and unleashed a black column of smoke.
Shirley Clark was watering plants in her backyard on Nottingham Drive when she spotted theplane gliding suspiciously quiet--just above rooftop level. "I did not hear a motor but the prop was turning," Clark said.
Then she saw fear on the pilot's face.
"The expression on the man was frightening," she said. "Obviously he had lost power. I give theman credit for trying to get the plane into an open field." By the time Oxnard firefighters arrived, one of the men was standing next to the wreckage, saidFire Department Battalion Chief Terry McAnally. The man seemed to have escaped seriousinjury. 830
Two other men were trapped beneath the plane. One was lying under the wing, and firefighterswere able to pull him out. The other was pinned under the left side, paramedics and firefighterssaid. Both suffered broken ankles and serious lacerations.
All three were taken to St. John's Regional Medical Center. "Everybody is conscious. Everybody is talking," said Lynn Borman, a paramedic supervisor withGold Coast Ambulance Company.
Hospital officials identified the men as 34-year-old Michael Macias, a certified flight instructorwith Sun-Air Aviation Inc. in Camarillo, and Beat Leu, 33, and Markus Vogel, 41, both ofSwitzerland. All three were listed in fair condition, a hospital spokeswoman said. "It was a clear day. It's hard to say what happened," McAnally said. "There was no report of anylanding gear down. They hit the roof, the pole and then tore off the wing. They're lucky they gotaway from it . . . if lucky is the word." Tad Dougherty, manager of the Oxnard Airport, said the pilot tried at the last minute to avoid thehomes. "He probably saved somebody," Dougherty said. "An experienced pilot will do everything he canto land the plane in a vacant field. He doesn't want to hit the house because he will injure himselfas well as anybody in the house." Residents in the nearby housing tract said that although they live near the Oxnard Airport theyhad never feared crashes before. "When we first came to look at the house we questioned the developer here about the planes,"said Gail Johnson, who lives across the street from the home clipped by the plane. "We were toldwe were not in a flight path." Crash investigators with the Federal Aviation Administration and the National TransportationSafety Board arrived about two hours after the accident to scrutinize the wreckage.
Investigators said it would be at least a day before they could determine a cause for the accident,said Brian Ashton, an FAA official at the scene.
Air traffic controllers at Point Mugu Naval Air Station reported receiving a distress call from thepilot about 2:30. The Cessna had lost power and was at an altitude of about 1,300 feet andfalling, said Phyllis Thrower, a Navy spokeswoman.
The plane was bound for Burbank but developed trouble about two miles from the OxnardAirport, Thrower said.
A representative at Sun-Air declined comment.
An instructor at another flight school at the Camarillo Airport said Sun-Air operates a Cessna210 with the matching tail number. 831
Hadly is a staff writer and Hobbs is a correspondent. Times staff writer Hilary MacGregor andcorrespondents Nick Green and David Greenberg contributed to this story. 832
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Fwd: Test scores of students in Oxnard elementary school district. .
Perello, Bert <[email protected]> Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 10:25 PM Bcc: [email protected]
Received from resident
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lawrence Stein <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: Test scores of students in Oxnard elementary school district. .
To: Arthur Valenzuela <[email protected]>, Brian McDonald <[email protected]>, Bert Perello <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Oscar Madrigal <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Larry Stein <[email protected]> CC: Jim Lavery <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Daniela Aguirre <[email protected]>, Dennis Ralph <[email protected]>, Tai Hartley <[email protected]>, Barbara and Don Pineado <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Steve Nash <[email protected]>, Angela Whitecomb <[email protected]>, Deterie Frank <[email protected]>, Manuel Munoz <[email protected]>, Joseph O Neil <[email protected]>, Thresa Clemen <[email protected]>, Larry Stein <[email protected]>, William Terry <[email protected]>, Citizen Journal <[email protected]>, Denis O'Leary <[email protected]>, Abel Magana <[email protected]>, Vince Behrens <[email protected]>, Aaron Starr <[email protected]>, Luciano Ortiz <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Saviers Road Design Team <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Thank you
Please note the level of education students are receiving when parents are paying $700,000 for single family homes near Teal Club.
On Wednesday, June 5, 2024 at 02:57:35 PM PDT, Lomeli, Patty <[email protected]> wrote:
Good afternoon Mr. Stein,
Attached is a letter and documents responsive to your request. Thank you.
Respectfully,
Patty Lomeli
Executive Assistant
Business & Fiscal Services
Oxnard School District
(805)385-1501 ext. 2401
833
28 attachments
LtrToL.Stein.AMCRfinancialServices.SchoolCapacityEnrollment.ResPubRec.240605.vm.pdf 831K
Recd 6-3-24. Ltr from Lawrence Stein RE Records Request Capacity and Expected Enrollment.pdf 44K
2018-Fremont School, enrollment.pdf
246K
2019-Fremont School, enrollment.pdf
252K
2020-Fremont School, enrollment.pdf
119K
2021-Fremont School, enrollment.pdf
119K
2022-Fremont School, enrollment.pdf
236K
2023-Fremont School, enrollment.pdf
291K
2018-Soria School, enrollment.pdf
236K
2019-Soria School, enrollment.pdf
228K
2020-Soria School, enrollment.pdf
117K
2021-Soria School, enrollment.pdf
116K
2022-Soria School, enrollment.pdf
244K
2023-Soria School, enrollment.pdf
297K
2018-Marshall School, enrollment.pdf
229K
2019-Marshall School, enrollment.pdf
228K
2020-Marshall School, enrollment.pdf
117K
2021-Marshall School, enrollment.pdf
117K
2022-Marshall School, enrollment.pdf
245K
2023-Marshall School, enrollment.pdf
305K
2018-McAuliffe School, enrollment.pdf
236K
2019-McAuliffe School, enrollment.pdf
235K
2020-McAuliffe School, enrollment.pdf
116K
834
2021-McAuliffe School, enrollment.pdf
117K
2022-McAuliffe School, enrollment.pdf
247K
2023-McAuliffe School, enrollment.pdf
291K
Estimated_Enrollment 2024-25. 6.4.24.pdf
84K
School Capacity.pdf
50K
835
OXNARD SCHOOL DNSTRNCT
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
VERONICA ROBLES-SOLIS
President
MONICA MADRIGAL LOPEZ
Clerk
ROSE GONZALES
MARYANN RODRIGUEZ
BRIAN R. MELANEPHY
ADMINISTRATION
ANABOLENA DEGENNA, Ed.D
Superintendent
VALERIE MITCHELL, MPPA
Assistant Supenntendent,
Business and Fiscal Services
NATALIA TORRES, Ed,D.
Assistant Superintendent,
Human Resources
ARACELY FOX, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent,
Fducational Services
105 I South "A" Street I Oxnard, California 93030 . 805/385-1501 | www.oxnardsd.org CHANGING THE WORLDI iN SCHOOL AND BEYOND
June 5,2024
VIA E.MAIL
Lawrence Paul Stein
1965 Falkner Place
Oxnard, CA 93033
(805) 486-6799
OxnardActivist@AOL. com
RE: Public Records Act Request Related to School Capacity and Enrollment Dear Mr. Stein,
Oxnard School District ("the District") is in receipt of your Public Records Act Re- quest (attached) received on June 3, 2024, whereby you requested "inspect the public documents that reflect the capacity of each school listed below as well as the enrollment expected for the school yeat 202412025 and inspect the public docu- ments that reflect the enrollment for the school years 201812019, 201912020, 202012021, 202112022,202212023, and 202312024 of each school listed Christa McAuliffe School, Thurgood Marshall School, Juan Lagunas Soria and Fremont Academy of Environmental Science & lnnovative Design. The documents can be emailed."
Attached are copies of the requested school enrollment information. The school enrollment information can also be found on the California School Dashboard web- site at www.caschooldashboard.org.
Attached are the maximum student capacity limits as determined by the California Department of Education based on the square footage of each classroom at the listed school sites. However, please note that a schools actually capacity is deter- mined by the individual programs offered at each school site and can fluctuate dur- ing the school year.
lf you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please contact me at (805) 385-1501, ext. 2401.
Sincerely,
Valerie Mitchell, MPPA
Assistant Superintendent
Business and Fiscal Services
VM/pl
encl.
Mission: IGNITE . TRANSFORM ' NURTURE ' EMBRACE
836
837
838
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability System.
System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
Suspension Rate
Yellow
English Learner
Progress
No Performance Color
English Language Arts
Orange
Mathematics
Red
School Details
NAME
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
ADDRESS
1130 North M Street
Oxnard, CA 93030-3906
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
6-8
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
1,133
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
76.7%
English Learners
20.3%
Foster Youth
0.2%
839
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Orange
68.5 points below standard
Maintained -1.3 Points
2 Red
3 Orange
1 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Red
114.6 points below
standard
Declined 5.8 Points
▼
3 Red
2 Orange
1 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
English Language Proficiency
Assessments for California
Results
Level 4 - Well Developed
14.3%
Level 3 - Moderately Developed
43.5%
Level 2 - Somewhat Developed
32.7%
Level 1 - Beginning Stage
9.5%
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
9.5% chronically absent
Increased 1.6%
▲
EQUITY REPORT
840
0 Red
4 Orange
2 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Yellow
10.1% suspended at least
once
Declined 0.3%
▼
2 Red
2 Orange
2 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
841
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability System.
System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
Suspension Rate
Green
English Learner
Progress
No Performance Color
English Language Arts
Yellow
Mathematics
Red
School Details
NAME
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
ADDRESS
1130 North M Street
Oxnard, CA 93030-3906
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
6-8
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
1,065
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
73.1%
English Learners
18.7%
Foster Youth
0.3%
842
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Yellow
58.8 points below standard
Increased 9.7 Points
▲
1 Red
2 Orange
2 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Red
113.6 points below
standard
Maintained 1 Points
4 Red
0 Orange
1 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
36.2% making
progress towards
English language
proficiency
Number of EL Students:
141
Progress Levels
Very High = 65% or higher
High = 55% to less than
65%
Medium = 45% to less than
55%
Low = 35% to less than 45%
Very Low = Less than 35%
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
10.1% chronically absent
Increased 0.6%
▲
EQUITY REPORT
843
0 Red
5 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Green
7.7% suspended at least
once
Declined 2.3%
▼
0 Red
1 Orange
2 Yellow
2 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
844
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state and local indicators on Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state and local indicators on the 2020 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are the 2020 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. More reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. More information regarding 2020 accountability is available on the information regarding 2020 accountability is available on the 2020 COVID-19 Accountability FAQs
2020 COVID-19 Accountability FAQs
web
web
page.
page.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability System.
System.
School Details
NAME
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
ADDRESS
1130 North M Street
Oxnard, CA 93030-3906
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
6-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
958
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
84.2%
English Learners
17.3%
Foster Youth
0.9%
845
846
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state indicators on the 2021 Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state indicators on the 2021 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. Information regarding the the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. Information regarding the reporting status of data is available at
reporting status of data is available at
COVID-19 and Data Reporting
COVID-19 and Data Reporting
and the
and the
COVID-19 Accountability
COVID-19 Accountability
FAQs
FAQs
.
.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability System.
System.
School Details
NAME
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
ADDRESS
1130 North M Street
Oxnard, CA 93030-3906
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
6-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
841
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
88.8%
English Learners
21.8%
Foster Youth
0.6%
847
848
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law allows the 2022 Dashboard to only display the most current Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law allows the 2022 Dashboard to only display the most current year of data (also known as Status). For this year only, performance levels will be reported using one of year of data (also known as Status). For this year only, performance levels will be reported using one of five Status levels (ranging from Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) for state measures. Please five Status levels (ranging from Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) for state measures. Please note that the Status levels associated with the Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rate Indicators are note that the Status levels associated with the Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rate Indicators are reversed (ranging from Very Low, Low, Medium, High, and Very High). Information regarding this year's reversed (ranging from Very Low, Low, Medium, High, and Very High). Information regarding this year's Dashboard data is available within the
Dashboard data is available within the
Dashboard Communications Toolkit
Dashboard Communications Toolkit
.
.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability System.
System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Very High
Suspension Rate
Very High
English Learner
Progress
High
English Language Arts
Very Low
Mathematics
Very Low
School Details
NAME
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
ADDRESS
1130 North M Street
Oxnard, CA 93030-3906
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
6-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
849
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
761
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
84.8%
English Learners
25.9%
Foster Youth
0.4%
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Very Low
70.5 points below standard
5 Very Low
1 Low
0 Medium
0 High
0 Very High
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Very Low
134.6 points below
standard
5 Very Low
1 Low
0 Medium
0 High
0 Very High
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
High
57.2% making
progress towards
English language
proficiency
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Academic Engagement
850
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Very High
26% chronically absent
5 Very High
1 High
0 Medium
0 Low
0 Very Low
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Very High
13.6% suspended at least
one day
5 Very High
0 High
1 Medium
0 Low
0 Very Low
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
851
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Explore the performance of Fremont Academy of Environmental Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability Science & Innovative Design under California's Accountability System.
System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Red
Suspension Rate
Red
English Learner
Progress
Orange
English Language Arts
Red
Mathematics
Orange
School Details
NAME
Fremont Academy of
Environmental Science &
Innovative Design
ADDRESS
1130 North M Street
Oxnard, CA 93030-3906
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
6-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
Socioeconomically
English Learners
Foster Youth
852
Enrollment
734
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
88.6%
English Learners
24.5%
Foster Youth
0.3%
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Red
82.1 points below standard
Declined 11.7 Points
▼
5 Red
1 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Orange
127.3 points below
standard
Increased 7.3 Points
▲
0 Red
6 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
Orange
49.3% making progress
Declined 7.9%
▼
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Red
853
27.6% chronically absent
Increased 1.6%
▲
5 Red
0 Orange
1 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
FREMONT ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
INNOVATIVE DESIGN
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Red
19.1% suspended at least
one day
Increased 5.5%
▲
5 Red
1 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
854
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Green
Suspension Rate
Orange
English Learner
Progress
No Performance Color
English Language Arts
Yellow
Mathematics
Yellow
School Details
NAME
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
ADDRESS
3101 Dunkirk Drive
Oxnard, CA 93035-1203
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-8
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
1,040
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
59.8%
English Learners
29.9%
Foster Youth
0.2%
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
855
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Yellow
13.8 points below standard
Increased 7.3 Points
▲
1 Red
0 Orange
3 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Yellow
67.4 points below standard
Increased 3.7 Points
▲
1 Red
3 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
English Language Proficiency
Assessments for California
Results
Level 4 - Well Developed
41.5%
Level 3 - Moderately Developed
39.7%
Level 2 - Somewhat Developed
13.5%
Level 1 - Beginning Stage
5.3%
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Green
4% chronically absent
Maintained 0.3%
0 Red
2 Orange
0 Yellow
3 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
856
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Orange
2% suspended at least once
Increased 1.5%
▲
0 Red
2 Orange
2 Yellow
0 Green
1 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
857
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Yellow
Suspension Rate
Orange
English Learner
Progress
No Performance Color
English Language Arts
Orange
Mathematics
Orange
School Details
NAME
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
ADDRESS
3101 Dunkirk Drive
Oxnard, CA 93035-1203
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-8
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
1,032
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
53.4%
English Learners
30.5%
Foster Youth
0.2%
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
858
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Orange
12 points below standard
Maintained 1.7 Points
0 Red
3 Orange
1 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Orange
66.1 points below standard
Maintained 1.3 Points
1 Red
1 Orange
2 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
45.5% making
progress towards
English language
proficiency
Number of EL Students:
200
Progress Levels
Very High = 65% or higher
High = 55% to less than
65%
Medium = 45% to less than
55%
Low = 35% to less than 45%
Very Low = Less than 35%
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Yellow
4.6% chronically absent
Increased 0.6%
▲
0 Red
3 Orange
1 Yellow
1 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
859
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Orange
2.5% suspended at least
once
Increased 0.5%
▲
0 Red
3 Orange
0 Yellow
1 Green
1 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
860
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state and local indicators on Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state and local indicators on the 2020 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are the 2020 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. More reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. More information regarding 2020 accountability is available on the information regarding 2020 accountability is available on the 2020 COVID-19 Accountability FAQs
2020 COVID-19 Accountability FAQs
web
web
page.
page.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
School Details
NAME
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
ADDRESS
3101 Dunkirk Drive
Oxnard, CA 93035-1203
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
983
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
67.9%
English Learners
26.3%
Foster Youth
0.4%
861
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state indicators on the 2021 Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state indicators on the 2021 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. Information regarding the the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. Information regarding the reporting status of data is available at
reporting status of data is available at
COVID-19 and Data Reporting
COVID-19 and Data Reporting
and the
and the
COVID-19 Accountability
COVID-19 Accountability
FAQs
FAQs
.
.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
School Details
NAME
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
ADDRESS
3101 Dunkirk Drive
Oxnard, CA 93035-1203
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
953
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
72.2%
English Learners
27.3%
Foster Youth
0.5%
862
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law allows the 2022 Dashboard to only display the most current Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law allows the 2022 Dashboard to only display the most current year of data (also known as Status). For this year only, performance levels will be reported using one of year of data (also known as Status). For this year only, performance levels will be reported using one of five Status levels (ranging from Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) for state measures. Please five Status levels (ranging from Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) for state measures. Please note that the Status levels associated with the Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rate Indicators are note that the Status levels associated with the Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rate Indicators are reversed (ranging from Very Low, Low, Medium, High, and Very High). Information regarding this year's reversed (ranging from Very Low, Low, Medium, High, and Very High). Information regarding this year's Dashboard data is available within the
Dashboard data is available within the
Dashboard Communications Toolkit
Dashboard Communications Toolkit
.
.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Very High
Suspension Rate
High
English Learner
Progress
Low
English Language Arts
Low
Mathematics
Low
School Details
NAME
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
ADDRESS
3101 Dunkirk Drive
Oxnard, CA 93035-1203
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Student Population
863
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
929
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
72.1%
English Learners
30.5%
Foster Youth
0.1%
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Low
10.9 points below standard
1 Very Low
3 Low
0 Medium
0 High
0 Very High
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Low
68.4 points below standard
1 Very Low
3 Low
0 Medium
0 High
0 Very High
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
Low
64.3% making
progress towards
English language
proficiency
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
864
Very High
20.1% chronically absent
3 Very High
2 High
0 Medium
0 Low
0 Very Low
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
High
3.1% suspended at least
one day
0 Very High
2 High
1 Medium
0 Low
2 Very Low
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
865
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under Explore the performance of Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Red
Suspension Rate
Orange
English Learner
Progress
Blue
English Language Arts
Orange
Mathematics
Orange
School Details
NAME
Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary
ADDRESS
3101 Dunkirk Drive
Oxnard, CA 93035-1203
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
920
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
71.6%
English Learners
33.3%
Foster Youth
0.1%
866
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Orange
18.5 points below standard
Declined 7.6 Points
▼
1 Red
3 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Orange
67.3 points below standard
Maintained 1.1 Points
2 Red
2 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
Blue
57.9% making progress
Increased 12.6%
▲
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Red
23.1% chronically absent
Increased 2.9%
▲
5 Red
0 Orange
0 Yellow
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
867
0 Green
0 Blue
JUAN LAGUNAS SORIA ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Orange
5% suspended at least one
day
Increased 1.9%
▲
4 Red
1 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
868
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Yellow
Suspension Rate
Yellow
English Learner
Progress
No Performance Color
English Language Arts
Yellow
Mathematics
Orange
School Details
NAME
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
ADDRESS
2900 Thurgood Marshall
Drive
Oxnard, CA 93036-6349
WEBSITE
http://www.oxnardsd.org
GRADES SERVED
K-5
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
532
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
74.1%
English Learners
43.6%
Foster Youth
0.2%
869
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Yellow
22.6 points below standard
Increased 25.6 Points
▲
0 Red
0 Orange
3 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Orange
49.8 points below standard
Maintained -2.5 Points
0 Red
3 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
English Language Proficiency
Assessments for California
Results
Level 4 - Well Developed
29%
Level 3 - Moderately Developed
36.7%
Level 2 - Somewhat Developed
19%
Level 1 - Beginning Stage
15.4%
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Yellow
8.1% chronically absent
Maintained -0.1%
0 Red
1 Orange
2 Yellow
2 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
870
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Yellow
0.7% suspended at least
once
Increased 0.7%
▲
0 Red
0 Orange
2 Yellow
1 Green
2 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
871
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
Suspension Rate
Orange
English Learner
Progress
No Performance Color
English Language Arts
Orange
Mathematics
Yellow
School Details
NAME
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
ADDRESS
2900 Thurgood Marshall
Drive
Oxnard, CA 93036-6349
WEBSITE
http://www.oxnardsd.org
GRADES SERVED
K-5
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
593
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
63.1%
English Learners
39%
Foster Youth
0.2%
872
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Orange
21.8 points below standard
Maintained 0.5 Points
1 Red
3 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Yellow
43.2 points below standard
Increased 6.1 Points
▲
1 Red
1 Orange
2 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
61.9% making
progress towards
English language
proficiency
Number of EL Students:
155
Progress Levels
Very High = 65% or higher
High = 55% to less than
65%
Medium = 45% to less than
55%
Low = 35% to less than 45%
Very Low = Less than 35%
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
9.9% chronically absent
Increased 1.9%
▲
1 Red
3 Orange
0 Yellow
1 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
873
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Orange
3% suspended at least once
Increased 2.3%
▲
1 Red
4 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
874
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state and local indicators on Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state and local indicators on the 2020 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are the 2020 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. More reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. More information regarding 2020 accountability is available on the information regarding 2020 accountability is available on the 2020 COVID-19 Accountability FAQs
2020 COVID-19 Accountability FAQs
web
web
page.
page.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
School Details
NAME
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
ADDRESS
2900 Thurgood Marshall
Drive
Oxnard, CA 93036-6349
WEBSITE
http://www.oxnardsd.org
GRADES SERVED
K-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
719
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
73.6%
English Learners
28.8%
Foster Youth
0.1%
875
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state indicators on the 2021 Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state indicators on the 2021 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. Information regarding the the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. Information regarding the reporting status of data is available at
reporting status of data is available at
COVID-19 and Data Reporting
COVID-19 and Data Reporting
and the
and the
COVID-19 Accountability
COVID-19 Accountability
FAQs
FAQs
.
.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
School Details
NAME
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
ADDRESS
2900 Thurgood Marshall
Drive
Oxnard, CA 93036-6349
WEBSITE
http://www.oxnardsd.org
GRADES SERVED
K-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
798
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
78.7%
English Learners
22.8%
Foster Youth
0.5%
876
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law allows the 2022 Dashboard to only display the most current Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law allows the 2022 Dashboard to only display the most current year of data (also known as Status). For this year only, performance levels will be reported using one of year of data (also known as Status). For this year only, performance levels will be reported using one of five Status levels (ranging from Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) for state measures. Please five Status levels (ranging from Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) for state measures. Please note that the Status levels associated with the Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rate Indicators are note that the Status levels associated with the Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rate Indicators are reversed (ranging from Very Low, Low, Medium, High, and Very High). Information regarding this year's reversed (ranging from Very Low, Low, Medium, High, and Very High). Information regarding this year's Dashboard data is available within the
Dashboard data is available within the
Dashboard Communications Toolkit
Dashboard Communications Toolkit
.
.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Very High
Suspension Rate
Very High
English Learner
Progress
Low
English Language Arts
Low
Mathematics
Low
School Details
NAME
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
ADDRESS
2900 Thurgood Marshall
Drive
Oxnard, CA 93036-6349
WEBSITE
http://www.oxnardsd.org
GRADES SERVED
K-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Student Population
877
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
779
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
75.4%
English Learners
24.8%
Foster Youth
0%
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Low
35.2 points below standard
1 Very Low
3 Low
1 Medium
0 High
0 Very High
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Low
89.2 points below standard
4 Very Low
1 Low
0 Medium
0 High
0 Very High
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
Low
63.4% making
progress towards
English language
proficiency
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
878
Very High
32% chronically absent
6 Very High
0 High
0 Medium
0 Low
0 Very Low
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Very High
7.6% suspended at least
one day
4 Very High
1 High
0 Medium
0 Low
1 Very Low
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
879
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under Explore the performance of Thurgood Marshall Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
Suspension Rate
Green
English Learner
Progress
Blue
English Language Arts
Orange
Mathematics
Yellow
School Details
NAME
Thurgood Marshall
Elementary
ADDRESS
2900 Thurgood Marshall
Drive
Oxnard, CA 93036-6349
WEBSITE
http://www.oxnardsd.org
GRADES SERVED
K-8
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
729
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
74.2%
English Learners
23.6%
Foster Youth
0.1%
880
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Orange
35.6 points below standard
Maintained -0.4 Points
0 Red
5 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Yellow
80.3 points below standard
Increased 8.9 Points
▲
2 Red
0 Orange
3 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
Blue
60% making progress
Increased 20.2%
▲
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
29.7% chronically absent
Declined 2.3%
▼
0 2
4 EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
881
Red
Orange
Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Green
2.7% suspended at least
one day
Declined 4.8%
▼
1 Red
1 Orange
1 Yellow
3 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
882
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
Suspension Rate
Green
English Learner
Progress
No Performance Color
English Language Arts
Yellow
Mathematics
Orange
School Details
NAME
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
ADDRESS
3300 West Via Marina
Avenue
Oxnard, CA 93035-2440
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-5
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
732
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
66.5%
English Learners
27.7%
Foster Youth
0.4%
883
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Yellow
39.2 points below standard
Increased 7.9 Points
▲
0 Red
0 Orange
4 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Orange
72.3 points below standard
Declined 4.6 Points
▼
0 Red
3 Orange
1 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
English Language Proficiency
Assessments for California
Results
Level 4 - Well Developed
35.9%
Level 3 - Moderately Developed
38.1%
Level 2 - Somewhat Developed
13.3%
Level 1 - Beginning Stage
12.7%
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
11.1% chronically absent
Maintained -0.4%
0 Red
3 Orange
2 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
884
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Green
0.8% suspended at least
once
Maintained -0.2%
0 Red
1 Orange
0 Yellow
2 Green
2 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
885
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
Suspension Rate
Red
English Learner
Progress
No Performance Color
English Language Arts
Yellow
Mathematics
Yellow
School Details
NAME
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
ADDRESS
3300 West Via Marina
Avenue
Oxnard, CA 93035-2440
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-5
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
698
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
56.7%
English Learners
28.1%
Foster Youth
0%
886
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Yellow
21.1 points below standard
Increased 17.7 Points
▲
0 Red
1 Orange
4 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Yellow
56 points below standard
Increased 14.6 Points
▲
1 Red
0 Orange
3 Yellow
1 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
62.2% making
progress towards
English language
proficiency
Number of EL Students:
119
Progress Levels
Very High = 65% or higher
High = 55% to less than
65%
Medium = 45% to less than
55%
Low = 35% to less than 45%
Very Low = Less than 35%
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Orange
12.8% chronically absent
Increased 1.7%
▲
1 Red
4 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
887
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Red
3.3% suspended at least
once
Increased 2.5%
▲
1 Red
4 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each
Color
888
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state and local indicators on Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state and local indicators on the 2020 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are the 2020 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. More reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. More information regarding 2020 accountability is available on the information regarding 2020 accountability is available on the 2020 COVID-19 Accountability FAQs
2020 COVID-19 Accountability FAQs
web
web
page.
page.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
School Details
NAME
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
ADDRESS
3300 West Via Marina
Avenue
Oxnard, CA 93035-2440
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-5
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
633
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
73.1%
English Learners
23.5%
Foster Youth
0.6%
889
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state indicators on the 2021 Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law has suspended the reporting of state indicators on the 2021 Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on Dashboard. However, available data that would have been included in the Dashboard are reported on the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. Information regarding the the Department's web site if they were determined to be valid and reliable. Information regarding the reporting status of data is available at
reporting status of data is available at
COVID-19 and Data Reporting
COVID-19 and Data Reporting
and the
and the
COVID-19 Accountability
COVID-19 Accountability
FAQs
FAQs
.
.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
School Details
NAME
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
ADDRESS
3300 West Via Marina
Avenue
Oxnard, CA 93035-2440
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-5
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
593
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
80.8%
English Learners
22.6%
Foster Youth
1.2%
890
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law allows the 2022 Dashboard to only display the most current Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state law allows the 2022 Dashboard to only display the most current year of data (also known as Status). For this year only, performance levels will be reported using one of year of data (also known as Status). For this year only, performance levels will be reported using one of five Status levels (ranging from Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) for state measures. Please five Status levels (ranging from Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low) for state measures. Please note that the Status levels associated with the Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rate Indicators are note that the Status levels associated with the Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rate Indicators are reversed (ranging from Very Low, Low, Medium, High, and Very High). Information regarding this year's reversed (ranging from Very Low, Low, Medium, High, and Very High). Information regarding this year's Dashboard data is available within the
Dashboard data is available within the
Dashboard Communications Toolkit
Dashboard Communications Toolkit
.
.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Very High
Suspension Rate
Low
English Learner
Progress
Low
English Language Arts
Low
Mathematics
Low
School Details
NAME
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
ADDRESS
3300 West Via Marina
Avenue
Oxnard, CA 93035-2440
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-5
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Student Population
891
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
534
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
78.5%
English Learners
25.3%
Foster Youth
0.7%
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Low
31.1 points below standard
1 Very Low
3 Low
0 Medium
0 High
0 Very High
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Low
57 points below standard
1 Very Low
3 Low
0 Medium
0 High
0 Very High
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
Low
57.6% making
progress towards
English language
proficiency
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
892
Very High
44.8% chronically absent
6 Very High
0 High
0 Medium
0 Low
0 Very Low
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Low
0.7% suspended at least
one day
0 Very High
0 High
1 Medium
3 Low
2 Very Low
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
893
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under Explore the performance of Christa McAuliffe Elementary under California's Accountability System.
California's Accountability System.
Chronic Absenteeism
Yellow
Suspension Rate
Orange
English Learner
Progress
Orange
English Language Arts
Orange
Mathematics
Yellow
School Details
NAME
Christa McAuliffe
Elementary
ADDRESS
3300 West Via Marina
Avenue
Oxnard, CA 93035-2440
WEBSITE
N/A
GRADES SERVED
K-5
CHARTER
No
DASHBOARD
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
STATUS
No
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Student Population
Explore information about this school's student
population.
Enrollment
508
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
83.7%
English Learners
22.4%
Foster Youth
0.2%
894
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Academic Performance
View Student Assessment Results and other aspects of
school performance.
LEARN MORE
English Language Arts
Orange
38.1 points below standard
Declined 7 Points
▼
0 Red
4 Orange
0 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
Mathematics
Yellow
45.2 points below standard
Increased 11.8 Points
▲
0 Red
0 Orange
4 Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
LEARN MORE
English Learner
Progress
Orange
40.8% making progress
Declined 3.3%
▼
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Academic Engagement
See information that shows how well schools are
engaging students in their learning.
LEARN MORE
Chronic Absenteeism
Yellow
35.6% chronically absent
Declined 9.2%
▼
0 4
2 EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
895
Red
Orange
Yellow
0 Green
0 Blue
CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY
Conditions & Climate
View data related to how well schools are providing a
healthy, safe and welcoming environment.
LEARN MORE
Suspension Rate
Orange
1.8% suspended at least
one day
Increased 1.2%
▲
0 Red
4 Orange
0 Yellow
2 Green
0 Blue
EQUITY REPORT
Number of Student Groups in Each Level
896
2024-2025 Estimated Enrollment
Schools Total
Fremont Academy 647
Juan Lagunas Soria 875
Marshall Elementary 686
McAuliffe Elementary 459
897
School Capacity
898
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Teal Club Specific Plan Environment Negative Declaration Lawrence Stein <[email protected]> Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 4:12 PM To: Arthur Valenzuela <[email protected]>, Brian McDonald <[email protected]>, Bert Perello <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Oscar Madrigal <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Larry Stein <[email protected]>, Jay Dobrowalski <[email protected]>, Alexander Nguyen <[email protected]>, Martha Guillen <[email protected]>, Luly Lopez <[email protected]>, Stephen Fischer <[email protected]>, Jim Lavery <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Daniela Aguirre <[email protected]>, Dennis Ralph <[email protected]>, Barbara and Don Pineado <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Steve Nash <[email protected]>, Angela Whitecomb <[email protected]>, Deterie Frank <[email protected]>, Manuel Munoz <[email protected]>, Joseph O Neil <[email protected]>, Thresa Clemen <[email protected]>, William Terry <[email protected]>, Citizen Journal <[email protected]>, Denis O'Leary <[email protected]>, Abel Magana <[email protected]>, Vince Behrens <[email protected]>, Aaron Starr <[email protected]>, Luciano Ortiz <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Saviers Road Design Team <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Maria Navarro <[email protected]>, Diana Velzy <[email protected]>, Michael Wolfe <[email protected]>, Javier Chagoyen-Lázaro <[email protected]>, Ashley Golden <[email protected]>
I believe that the Teal Club Specific Plan will have a negative impact on the environment.
The city has not provided a time line when 14,000 area feet of recycled water will be generated.
The public works director has stated numerous times at the city’s CIP’s budget meetings does not have the resources to build the necessary wells and filter to make the recycled water potable, if I am wrong please provide the council resolutions approving the funding.
The city does not have the funds to maintain the existing parks, where will the funding come from in the General Fund to finish Sports Park, College Park, and Campus Park? Developers fees were to pay for Sports Park, the city spent the money and the park did not get built. What will prevent the city from taking developer fees for the park at Teal Club and spending the money without building the park? The waste water pipes are too small to handle the additional waste water originating from the project. What is the funding source to replumb the city from Teal Club to Perkins Road? Please provide the council resolution authorizing the funding.
The Intelligent Traffic System (ITS) only works at specific times on specific roads, it does not work at peak traffic hours on all the arterial roads. The increase traffic generated from the Teal Club Road has no mitigation stated in the Specific Plan.
The children will have a substandard education, based upon the current test scores. The affordability of the homes for current Oxnard Residents is questionable, the EIR does not address the high cost of housing compared to the wages of average resident of Oxnard, from whom the housing is intended for. Where will the downpayments come from? The quality of air due to the lead in fuels of the planes landing and taking off at the Oxnard Airport is questionable and cannot be mitigated. The quality of life of the future residents of Teal Club Specific Plan will be less than ideal.
Mr. City Manager, please explain to me, how this Specific Plan will not have a negative impact on the environment.
899
Lawrence Stein 07 17 2024 [email protected]
900
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Environmental Impact Teal Club Spdecific Plan Not Mitigated Lawrence Stein <[email protected]> Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 4:33 PM To: Steve Nash <[email protected]>, Vince Stewart <[email protected]> Cc: Arthur Valenzuela <[email protected]>, Brian McDonald <[email protected]>, Bert Perello <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Oscar Madrigal <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Larry Stein <[email protected]>, Oxnard City Clerk <[email protected]>, Jim Lavery <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Daniela Aguirre <[email protected]>, Dennis Ralph <[email protected]>, Barbara and Don Pineado <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Steve Nash <[email protected]>, Angela Whitecomb <[email protected]>, Deterie Frank <[email protected]>, Manuel Munoz <[email protected]>, Joseph O Neil <[email protected]>, Thresa Clemen <[email protected]>, William Terry <[email protected]>, Citizen Journal <[email protected]>, Denis O'Leary <[email protected]>, Abel Magana <[email protected]>, Vince Behrens <[email protected]>, Aaron Starr <[email protected]>, Luciano Ortiz <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Saviers Road Design Team <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Alexander Nguyen <[email protected]>, Stephen Fischer <[email protected]>, Martha Guillen <[email protected]>, Luly Lopez <[email protected]>, Diana Velzy <[email protected]>, Jay Dobrowalski <[email protected]>, Michael Wolfe <[email protected]>, Ashley Golden <[email protected]>, Wendy Carlton <[email protected]> Mr. City Manager, I believe that the Teal Club Specific Plan will have a negative impact on the environment. The city has not provided a time line when 14,000 area feet of recycled water will be generated. The public works director has stated numerous times at the city’s CIP’s budget meetings the city does not have the resources to build the necessary wells and filters to make the recycled water potable, if I am wrong, please provide the council resolutions approving the funding.
The city does not have the funds to maintain the existing parks, where will the funding come from in the General Fund to finish Sports Park, College Park, and Campus Park? Developer’s fees were to pay for Sports Park, the city spent the money and the park did not get built. What will prevent the city from taking developer’s fees for the park at Teal Club and spending the money without building the park? The waste water pipes are too small to handle the additional waste water originating from the project. What is the funding source to replumb the city from Teal Club to Perkins Road? There has not been the funding to repair the existing holding tanks at Perkins Road that are beyond their useful life. Please provide the council resolution authorizing the funding.
Please provide the time line when the waste water facility be able to handle the growth projection stated in the EIR.
The Intelligent Traffic System (ITS) only works at specific times on specific roads, it does not work at peak traffic hours on all the arterial roads. The increase traffic generated from the Teal Club Road has no mitigation stated in the Specific Plan.
The children will have a substandard education, based upon the current test scores. The affordability of the homes for current Oxnard Residents is questionable, the EIR does not address the high cost of housing compared to the wages of average resident of Oxnard, from whom the housing is intended for. Where will the down payments come from? The quality of air due to the lead in fuels of the planes landing and taking off at the Oxnard Airport is questionable and cannot be mitigated. The quality of life of the future residents of Teal Club Specific Plan will be less than ideal.
901
Mr. City Manager, please explain to me, how this Specific Plan will not have a negative impact on the environment.
City Clerk:
PS I do not have the email address of the other Planning Commissioners, Please forward my concerns to them.
Thank you
Larry Stein An Oxnard Activist 07 20 2024
902
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Water Mitagations Teal Club Specific Plan
Lawrence Stein <[email protected]> Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 12:02 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Jay Dobrowalski <[email protected]>, Arthur Valenzuela <[email protected]>, Brian McDonald <[email protected]>, Bert Perello <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Oscar Madrigal <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Larry Stein <[email protected]>, Diana Velzy <[email protected]>, Alexander Nguyen <[email protected]>, Martha Guillen <[email protected]>, Luly Lopez <[email protected]>, Stephen Fischer <[email protected]>, Jim Lavery <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Daniela Aguirre <[email protected]>, Dennis Ralph <[email protected]>, Barbara and Don Pineado <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Ray Blattel <[email protected]>, Steve Nash <[email protected]>, Angela Whitecomb <[email protected]>, Deterie Frank <[email protected]>, Manuel Munoz <[email protected]>, Joseph O Neil <[email protected]>, Thresa Clemen <[email protected]>, William Terry <[email protected]>, Citizen Journal <[email protected]>, Denis O'Leary <[email protected]>, Abel Magana <[email protected]>, Vince Behrens <[email protected]>, Isaac Khalaf <[email protected]>, Aaron Starr <[email protected]>, Luciano Ortiz <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Saviers Road Design Team <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: Wendy Carlton <[email protected]>, Michael Wolfe <[email protected]>, Ashley Golden <[email protected]>, Javier Chagoyen-Lázaro <[email protected]> Mr. Jay Dobrowalski:
The success of the Urban Water Management Plan is based upon, first the ability to generate annually 14,000 acre feet of potable water from the recycled water plant an Perkins Road, and second to store the water in the Advance Storage and Recovery (ASR) Wells that were to have been built with the funds from the 2010 water bonds. Instead of building the ASR wells that were approved by city council with the passage of the 2010 water bonds, an auditorium was built at the Perkins Road Site. In the various CIP Budgets in the last few years, the Public Works Director as stated that Public Works does not have, nor plan to have the resources necessary the build the infrastructure to generate and store annually 14,000 acre feet of potable water from the Perkins Road Site. Since the city has not funded or has plans to fund the infrastructure to generate and store potable water from the recycled water, the city should not cite the Urban Water Management Plan as a mitigation for water demand created by adding additional housing stock to the city.
Please note the area is still in a draught, the draught restrictions have not been lifted after 7 years.
Additional water restrictions go into effect 01/01/2025. What is the outside source of water for 10,000 housing units the city reported to the state that the city has? Does the city have the infrastructure (water and waste water) currently in place for the expected growth cited in the 2030 General Plan. If not, has city council approved the funding necessary to finance the necessary infrastructure outlined in the 2030 General Plan?
Larry Stein An Oxnard Activist 07 26 2024
903
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
07 30 204 Agenda Report N3 AFR Well additional Funding
Lawrence Stein <[email protected]> Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 8:42 PM To: Oxnard City Clerk <[email protected]>, Diana Velzy <[email protected]>, Alexander Nguyen <[email protected]>, Michael Wolfe <[email protected]>, Jay Dobrowalski <[email protected]>, Wendy Carlton <[email protected]>, Ashley Golden <[email protected]>, Luly Lopez <[email protected]>, Martha Guillen <[email protected]>, Arthur Valenzuela <[email protected]>, Brian McDonald <[email protected]>, Bert Perello <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Oscar Madrigal <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Larry Stein <[email protected]>, Jim Lavery <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Daniela Aguirre <[email protected]>, Dennis Ralph <[email protected]>, Barbara and Don Pineado <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Ray Blattel <[email protected]>, Steve Nash <[email protected]>, Angela Whitecomb <[email protected]>, Deterie Frank <[email protected]>, Manuel Munoz <[email protected]>, Joseph O Neil <[email protected]>, Thresa Clemen <[email protected]>, William Terry <[email protected]>, Citizen Journal <[email protected]>, Denis O'Leary <[email protected]>, Abel Magana <[email protected]>, Vince Behrens <[email protected]>, Isaac Khalaf <[email protected]>, Aaron Starr <[email protected]>, Luciano Ortiz <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Saviers Road Design Team <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
I have been following the Recycled Water program as a private citizen since 2008.
The Advance Water and Purification Facility at Perkins road became operational in September 2012, two months after Councilman Perillo was appointed to City Council. Water bonds were approved in 2010 to build the advance water purification system and the advance storage and recovery wells. Instead of building the advance storage and recovery wells necessary to make the recycled water program to be the backbone of the city's water program, as promoted by Public Work in 2010, Public Works built an auditorium. The ASR wells were never built. It is my opinion that the City Manager, the City CFO and the City attorney had to be complicate with the Public Works Director to approve the contracts and financing to build the auditorium in 2012 instead of the ASR wells. As stated in the video presentation, the test pilot well was started in 2019. 5 years later, the pilot well is not finished and an additional $900,000 is needed. What's wrong with picture, it is that the well is taking more than 5 years to build. The Urban Water Management Plan adopted by city council in 2022, was to have the recycled water program generate 14,000 acre feet of potable water, but the city is still constructing the test well after 5 years. The recycled water program has not passed state tests since the AWTF became operational in 2012. When will staff stop misleading this member of the public in implying that City will be producing potable water from recycled water in the near future? The CIP budgets for the next 5 year has no funding to finance the infrastructure to produce 14,000 acre feet annually of potable water needed for the Urban Water Management Plan that was adopted in 2022, the city has no money for this project according to the Public Works Director.
It is my opinion that the current City Manager, City CFO and City Attorney are complicate with the current Public Works Director in preventing the necessary ASR wells that will supply the annual storage capacity required for the Urban Water Management Plan from being built.
According to the 5-Year water cost study submitted to City Council in 2023, the city is and will be spending $24,000,000 and more each year to import water. Based upon previous public meetings the one time cost to build the necessary ASR wells that will annually store and repump 14,000 acre feet of recycled water, is in the neighborhood of $20,000,000. The current 5 users of recycled water are paying less than $300.00 per acre foot for recycled water that, based on the current production level of 3,000 acre feet of recycled water had a cost over $6,000 per acre foot in 2013 904
study I performed, that cost included debt service. The city has been unwilling to release the total cost of recycled water only, in the water cost study of 2023. The debt service is combined and the Financial Reporting tools does not report the recycle water costs for prior years nor the debt service associated with only the recycled water program.
FYI, the analysis that I performed in 2013 indicated that cost of recycled water would cost less than $1,400 if 14,000 acre feet of recycled water was blended into the city’s water supply.
That cost included debt service. This information was shared with staff and the elected members of city council several times in the period from 2013 to 2015. Who benefits if the recycled water does not get generated? First, the water suppliers would not be getting $20,000,000+ per year.
Second, the current users of recycled water would no longer have the $10,000,000+ annual subsidy.
Respectfully submitted 07 27 2024
Larry Stein An Oxnard Activist
905
ATTACHMENTO
STAFF
PRESENTATION
906
Teal Club Specific Plan
1 Planning Commission
November 21, 2024
Planning & Zoning Permit Nos.:
15-610-01 (Annexation), 15-620-03 (General Plan Amendment), 16-560-01 (Pre-Zoning), 24-670-02 (Development Agreement), 15-630-01 (Specific Plan) Property Located North of Oxnard Airport, South of Doris Road, East of Patterson Road, and West of Ventura Road
Applicant: Borchard Property Co-Owners
907
Project Description
2 A request for the following actions:
● General Plan Amendment
● Annexation
● Pre-Zoning
● Adopt the T eal Club Specific Plan (TCSP)
● Development Agreement
● Certify Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
The requested actions will allow for the future development of the following subject to the provision of the Specific Plan:
● Residential: up to 990 units in a variety of densities, with 15% Affordable ● Commercial: up to 55,000 sq.ft. for retail, mixed use, and office use ● Business and Research Park: up to 132,000 sq.ft. for office ● Parks and Open Space: 17.76 acres for two parks, and a greenbelt 908
Project Location
N
3 N
PROJECT
SITE
909
Existing Conditions
4 View from Ventura Road and T eal Club Road looking northwest
PROJECT
SITE
910
Existing Conditions
5 View from Ventura Road and Doris Avenue looking southwest
PROJECT
SITE
911
Existing Conditions
6 View from T eal Club Road looking west
PROJECT
SITE
912
Existing Conditions
7 View from T eal Club Road and Patterson Road looking northeast
PROJECT
SITE
913
Surrounding Land Uses
SITE
8 N
TEAL CLUB ROAD
LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
BUSINESS
RESEARCH PARK
OXNARD
AIRPORT
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
DORIS AVENUE
FARMLAND
VENTURA ROAD
914
Background
Existing Development:
• The TCSP area is in active agricultural use (row crops) and has been developed with agricultural structures and single family residences.
• Parcels south of T eal Club road are a mix of vacant land, and residential developments with ancillary vehicle storage and shop uses.
Proposed Project:
• In 2005, 2009, and 2011, the project was submitted, reviewed, and revised. • In 2015, the current project was submitted.
• Based on the environmental review comments, the project was revised to its current form. 915
General Plan Amendment
10 Site has existing land use designations in 2030 General Plan Amendment changes land use designations for consistency Existing/Proposed land use designations:
● Residential Low
● Residential Low-Medium
● Residential High
● General Commercial
● Park
● Public Facility
● Business Research Park
● Open Space
● Airport Compatible
916
General Plan Land Use Map
Existing 2030 General Plan:
Proposed 2030 General Plan:
N
N
11 AC
917
Annexation
12 Annexation of multiple parcels from County of Ventura:
● 142.72 acres of agricultural parcels in TCSP
● 11.4 acres of parcels south of T eal Club Road
Parcels south of T eal Club Road are vacant, industrial, residential uses ● Annexation required to not create an unincorporated “island” Entire project area will be annexed to City utilities
● Includes Calleguas Municipal Water District
918
Annexation Map
Existing City Boundary:
Proposed City Boundary:
NN
13 919
Pre-Zoning
14 ● The T eal Club Specific Plan Area would be zoned Specific Plan, and would be subject to the provisions of the T eal Club Specific Plan.
● Parcels south of T eal Club Road outside of the specific plan, would be zoned Light Industrial (M-1), which allows for uses such as: manufacturing facilities, machine shops, warehouses, automobile, aircraft or boat assembly or repair, research and development uses, and others, subject to certain development standards.
○ Existing residential uses may remain as existing non-conforming uses ○ EIR assumes development of entire area for a total of 347,608 square feet 920
Zoning Map
Existing Zoning (None):
Proposed Zoning:
NN
15 921
Teal Club Specific Plan
16 The T eal Club Specific Plan seeks to create a new community that carefully integrates multiple land uses in a walkable setting. The entire plan area is linked together by the east /west multi-use trail, Class II bike lanes, and neighborhood sidewalks.
The design incorporates Urban Village concepts with an emphasis on highly-visible pedestrian routes and the interconnection of residential neighborhoods, community- serving commercial uses, recreational opportunities, the adjacent Oxnard School District educational facilities and on-site public transportation access.
The following slides show some of the key areas of the TCSP:
922
Teal Club Specific Plan - Key Items
17 Land Use and Zoning:
● A proposed development program within 14 proposed Planning Areas (PA) for a mix of land uses on the approximately 149.72-acre TCSP portion of the project area.
Affordable Housing:
● Residential component requires that 15% of the total residential development is affordable housing for very low and lower- income workforce households.
Development Standards:
● Established to provide objective standards governing development of each of the PAs, and ensure that each area is developed consistent with the Zone Classifications outlined in Section 3.3 of the TCSP and within the density range of development in each PA. 923
Teal Club Specific Plan - Key Items
18 Infrastructure & Community Services:
● Improvements to the roadway network located outside the Specific Plan area. ● Intersection improvements required at Doris Avenue/Victoria Avenue and T eal Club Road/Victoria Avenue.
● Development is not proposed at this time.
● Parking for development projects will be reviewed at the time of development review.
Off-site Improvements and Utilities:
● Intersection improvements would be required at Doris Avenue/Victoria Avenue and T eal Club Road/Victoria Avenue.
● Agricultural water rights for each property would be transferred to the City after approval of a Final Tract Map and prior to the start of construction. All existing and proposed wastewater lines would connect to the Oxnard Wastewater Treatment Plant on Perkins Road. ● The area would generally drain into new storm drains within T eal Club Road and Patterson Road, with additional stormwater management provided by the proposed retention and on-site infiltration areas in the TCSP area.
924
Teal Club Specific Plan - Key Items
19 Implementation:
● All development within the TCSP area is subject to the standards and guidelines in the TCSP . All projects within the Specific Plan require a Development Design Review permit. ● Approval of a Special Use Permit shall be required for any conditionally allowed uses or any deviations from the Development Standards within the Specific Plan.
Development Phasing and Timing:
● Phase 1 includes development of property owned by the Borchard Family Interests (approximately 91.83 acres of the 149.72-acre TCSP area). ● Grading and improvements to Phase 1 would begin in 2025 and construction of homes would begin in 2026 for each of the Planning Areas within Phase 1. ● Phase 2 includes the remainder of the proposed TCSP area owned by three other parties. 925
Development Agreement
20 The proposed development agreement between the Applicant and City, generally provides framework for financial commitments to City, allows for fee modifications, defines affordable housing requirements, outlines timing for infrastructure improvements, and maintenance requirements:
● Agreement will remain in effect for 10 years
● Developer will construct 6.5 acre park in Phase 1
● Developer shall construct all infrastructure improvements ● Special review process to ensure compliance with TCSP ● City will form at least one Community Facilities District ● Future development will include 15% of units as affordable to Very-Low Income and Low-Income households. Units will be affordable for 55 years
● Developer will pay a fee to City for Affordable Farmworker Housing ● Developer agrees to Local Buyer and Local Hire Preferences ● Developer will pay a Police and Fire Mitigation Fee to offset proportional staffing costs The proposed Development Agreement only applies to Phase 1 of the T eal Club Specific Plan Project. 926
General Plan Consistency
TCSP site has General Plan designation of “Urban Village” characterized by a mix of land uses, transit accessibility, pedestrian orientation, and neighborhood identity Project compatibility with General Plan policies and goals discussed in EIR Parcels south of T eal Club Road are designated for Airport Compatible uses that do not interfere with airport operations or subject large numbers of persons to aircraft hazards Project is consistent with General Plan and land use designations 21 927
Environmental Review
22 Proposed Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2015-01:
● EIR identifies potential impacts, mitigation measures, monitoring requirements, residual impacts;
● Draft EIR review period for 60 days (45 days required) ● City received 39 comment letters
● Comments and responses included in EIR
● Changes made to Draft EIR for Final EIR based on comments 928
Environmental Review
23 Final EIR identified the following:
Class 1 Impacts (Significant and Unavoidable):
● Agricultural Resources
● Air Quality
Class 2 Impacts (Potentially Significant but Mitigable, Mitigation Required):
● Aesthetics
● Biological Resources
● Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural
Resources
● Geology and Soils
● Hazards and Hazardous Materials
● Hydrology and Water Quality
● Land Use and Planning
● Public Services and Recreation
● Utilities
Class 3 Impacts (Less Than Significant, No
Mitigation Required):
● Greenhouse Gas Emissions/Climate
Change
● Mineral Resources
● Noise
● Population, Education and Housing
● Transportation/Traffic
● Wildfire
929
EIR Findings
24 Final EIR includes a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program:
● Details process to implement required mitigation measures ● After implementation of standard conditions and mitigation measures, all potentially significant impacts will be reduced to less than significant levels Final EIR identified significant impacts:
● Agricultural Resources
● Air Quality
930
EIR Findings
25 Project would result in significant impacts:
Agricultural Resources:
● Conversion of 149.5 acres of “Important Farmland” with prime soils to non-agricultural use ● Permanent loss of agricultural lands
● Included in General Plan EIR
● T o offset regional impact, Mitigation Measure requires payment of agricultural conservation in-lieu fee Air Quality:
● Operational emissions would exceed daily thresholds
● High emissions associated with energy sources
● Most emissions generated from project traffic
● Mitigation Measures include payment of Transportation Demand Management Fund fee, energy saving construction measures, passive energy conservation design, natural ventilation building design Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) were prepared 931
EIR Findings
26 Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC):
● Fulfills vision for Urban Village in General Plan
● Helps create economic match between on-site housing and employment opportunities ● Implementation will result in a variety of residential products and unit types ● Retail, mixed use, office use, centered around public plaza within walking distance to public transportation and residential units
● Diverse residential types: affordable, market rate multi-family, smaller single-family ● Creates integrated vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle circulation system ● Complies with 2030 General Plan Housing Element affordability requirement ● Creates buffers between residential development and airport and agricultural land ● Implementation includes two park areas and greenbelt area ● Traditional neighborhood design similar to Historic District promotes walking Thus, staff recommends certification of the EIR
932
Community Workshop
Project site is located adjacent to Cabrillo, Fremont North, and Fremont South Neighborhoods, so project was presented during the April 2022 Community Workshop meeting.
Notice of the meeting was posted on site and mailed to the entire Cabrillo, Fremont North, and Fremont South Neighborhoods
Prior to the meeting, staff received two comment letters regarding the project. The information in the letters does not change staff recommendations. 27 933
Public Notice
Notice of Planning Commission hearing provided:
• Newspaper
• On-site posting (3 locations)
• Mailed to property owners within 300 feet
Since the end of the EIR comment period, staff has received several comment letters regarding the project. The information in the letters does not change staff recommendations.
28 934
Staff Recommendation
29 That the Planning Commission:
a) Adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council certify Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2015-01 for the T eal Club Specific Plan (Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse No. 2012051080); and
b) Adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 15-610-01 for Annexation, subject to certain findings; and c) Adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 15-620-03 for a General Plan Amendment, subject to certain findings; and d) Adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 15-560-01 for a Pre-Zoning, subject to certain findings; and e) Adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 24-670-02 for a Development Agreement; and
f) Adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 15-640-01 for a Specific Plan, subject to certain findings. 935
30 936
Teal Club Specific Plan
Prepared for:
City of Oxnard
Development Services
Prepared by:
Development Planning Services, Inc.
Camarillo, California 93012
March 2025
City Council Hearing version 2025
Development Planning Services, Inc. © 2023
Teal Club Specific Plan
937
Teal Club Specific Plan
938
Teal Club Specific Plan
Prepared for:
City of Oxnard
Development Services
Prepared by:
Development Planning Services, Inc.
Camarillo, California 93012
March 2025
City Council Hearing version 2025
Development Planning Services, Inc. © 2023
Teal Club Specific Plan
939
Teal Club Specific Plan
Teal Club Specific Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the Specific Plan 10
1.2 Authority and Scope 10
1.2.1 California Government Code Compliance 10
1.2.2 City of Oxnard Zoning Code Compliance 11
1.3 Project Site Location 11
1.3.1 Physical Setting 11
1.3.2 Existing Land uses and On-Site Characteristics 14
1.4 Project Goals and Objectives 18
1.4.1 Goal #1 18
1.4.2 Goal #2 18
1.4.3 Goal #3 19
1.5 Scope & Format 19
Sustainable Community
2.1 Overview 20
2.2 Land Use & Transportation 20
2.2.1 Jobs and Housing Proximity 20
2.2.2 Transit-Oriented Development 20
2.2.3 Integrated Land Uses 20
2.2.4 Density 21
2.3 Energy Generation and Conservation 21
2.3.1 Solar Ready & Title 24 21
2.3.2 Beyond Green Code 21
2.3.3 PEV Charging Stations 21
2.4 GHG Mitigations 21
2.4.1 Urban Forestry 21
2.4.2 Other GHG Emissions 21
Community Development
3.1 Planning Context 24
3.2 Land Use Plan 25
3.3 Proposed Zone Classifications 30
3.3.1 Zone Classifications 30
3.3.2 Inclusionary Housing 30
CHAPTER/SECTION P AGE
940
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 T able of Contents
3.4 Development Standards 30
3.5 Design Philosophy and Objectives 30
3.6 Philosophy and Objectives 31
3.6.1 Pedestrian-Oriented Design Objectives 31
3.6.2 Residential Design Objectives 34
3.6.3 Urban Village & Mixed Use Commercial Design Objectives 34
3.6.4 Business Research Park Design Objectives 35
3.6.5 Open Space Design Objectives 39
3.7 Design Guidelines 39
3.7.1 Architectural Styles 39
3.7.2 Residential Development 48
3.7.3 Commercial & Mixed Use Development 55
3.7.4 Business Research Park Development 58
3.7.5 Public Parks & HOA Recreation Areas 60
3.7.6 Open Space 63
3.7.7 Landscape 64
3.7.8 Hardscape & Street Furniture 69
3.7.9 Curbs & Sidewalks 70
3.7.10 Lighting 70
3.7.11 Walls & Fences 71
3.7.12 Mailboxes 71
3.7.13 Signage 72
3.8 Urban Village 74
3.8.1 Mixed Uses 74
3.8.2 Transit Oriented 74
3.8.3 Public Spaces 74
Infrastructure & Community Services
4.1 Infrastructure Overview 76
4.2 Circulation Plan 76
4.2.1 On-Site Streets 76
4.2.2 Off-Site Streets 77
4.2.3 Bike L anes & Trail N etworks 90
CHAPTER/SECTION P AGE
941
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table of Contents
Teal Club Specific Plan
4.3 Public Facilities 92
4.3.1 Potable Water 92
4.3.2 Advanced W ater P urification S ystem 9 2
4.3.3 Wastewater System 92
4.3.4 Stormwater D rainage 93
4.3.5 Solid W aste D isposal 93
4.3.6 Natural G as 101
4.3.7 Electricity 101
4.3.8 Public Schools 101
4.3.9 Police Protection 101
4.3.10 Fire Protection 101
4.3.11 Parks & Recreation 102
Environmental Resources
5.1 Overview 104
5.2 Water Resources 104
5.2.1 Water Supply 104
5.2.2 Advanced Water Purification System 104
5.3 Aesthetic Resources 104
5.3.1 Open Space 104
5.3.2 Roadways 104
5.4 Character Enhancement 105
5.5 Landscape Design 105
5.6 Agriculture 105
5.7 Air Quality 105 Safety & Hazards
6.1 Overview 106
6.2 Airport Compatibility 106
6.3 Noise 106
6.4 Traffic & Pedestrian Safety 106
CHAPTER/SECTION P AGE
942
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 T able of Contents
Housing
7.1 Overview 108
7.2 Urban Village Concept 108
7.3 Inclusionary Housing 109
7.4 Residential Unit Mix 110
Implementation
8.1 Phasing 112
8.2 Agricultural Buffers 112
8.3 Financing Districts 113
8.4 Development Review Process 113
8.5 Specific Plan Administrative 113
8.5.1 Minor Modifications 113
8.5.2 Specific Plan Amendments 116
8.6 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 116 General Plan Consistency
9.1 General Plan Consistency 119
Appendix
1 Landscape Palette 146
List of Figures
Figure 1-1 Regional Location & Curb Boundaries 12 Figure 1-2 Assessors Parcels 13
Figure 1-3 Surrounding Land Uses 16
Figure 1-4 Land Use Plan 17
Figure 3-1 Land Use Plan 27
Figure 3-2 Pedestrian Circulation 33
Figure 3-3 Central Public Plaza 36
CHAPTER/SECTION P AGE
943
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table of Contents
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 3-4 BRP Landscape Buffer 38
Figure 3-5 Architecture - Craftsman 40 Figure 3-6 Architecture - Traditional 42 Figure 3-7 Architecture Spanish Colonial Revival 44 Figure 3-8 Architecture - Monterey 46
Figure 4-1 Vehicular Circulation Plan 78 Figure 4-2 Residential Collector 79
Figure 4-3 Residential Collector - Beverly Drive 80 Figure 4-4 Local Streets 81
Figure 4-5 Primary Arterial - Ventura Road 83 Figure 4-6 Secondary Arterial - Doris Avenue 85 Figure 4-7 Secondary Arterial - Patterson Road (Phase 1) 86 Figure 4-8 Secondary Arterial - Patterson Road (Ultimate) 87 Figure 4-9 Secondary Arterial - Teal Club Road (Phase 1) 88 Figure 4-10 Secondary Arterial - Teal Club Road (Ultimate) 89 Figure 4-11 Bike Path Circulation 91
Figure 4-12 Public Facilities 94
Figure 4-13 Proposed Phase 1 Water System 95 Figure 4-14 Proposed Build-out Water System 96 Figure 4-15 Proposed Phase 1 Wastewater System 97 Figure 4-16 Proposed Build-out Wastewater System 98 Figure 4-17 Proposed Phase 1 Stormwater Drainage System 99 Figure 4-18 Proposed Build-out Stormwater Drainage System 100 Figure 6-1 Air Safety Zones Map 107 Figure 8-1 Proposed Phased Improvement Plan Phase 1 114 Figure 8-2 Proposed Build-out Improvement Plan 115
CHAPTER/SECTION P AGE
944
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 T able of Contents
List of Tables
Table 3-1 Land Use Table 26
Table 3-2 Land Use Statistical Summary 28 Table 3-3 Zoning 29
Table 3-4 Development Standards Summary 32 Table 9 -1 2030 G eneral P lan C onsistency 1 18
945
p.10 Introduction
Teal Club Specific Plan
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN
The Teal Club Specific Plan provides the City
of Oxnard with a comprehensive planning
document to direct the orderly development
of the 149.7-acre property known as the Teal
Club Planning Area (see Figures 1-1 and 1-2).
The Specific Plan provides a conceptual land
use plan, development standards, guidelines,
and programs to ensure that this area of the
city is developed in a manner consistent with
the goals, objectives, principles, and policies
of the City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan
(referred to in this document as the General
Plan).
The Specific Plan allows development
of a variety of residential, mixed-use,
neighborhood commercial, industrial and
recreational uses within the Specific Plan
area. The guidelines and standards contained
in this Specific Plan will ensure that these
uses, and the associated infrastructure
elements and public spaces are planned and
designed in an integrated manner.
Creating a walkable Urban Village is a
primary goal of this Specific Plan. In order to
ensure long-term sustainability the Specific
Plan shall incorporate policies of both the
State of California SB 375 (Greenhouse Gas
Bill) and “Build It Green” design standards.
The plan includes a strategically-placed
Transit Hub with bus turn-out and shelter
and bike racks at Ventura Road and Beverly
Drive.
1.2 AUTHORITY & SCOPE
California Government Code (Sections 65450
through 65457) authorizes the preparation
and adoption of specific plans. The Teal
Club Specific Plan has been prepared in
accordance with the requirements of this
code as summarized below.
1.2.1 CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
COMPLIANCE
California Government Code Section 65450
gives a legislative body the authority to
prepare a specific plan for the systematic
implementation of the General Plan for all or
part of the area covered by the General Plan.
As outlined in the Government Code Sections
65451 and 65452, specific plans are to contain
a text and diagram or diagrams specifying the
following:
The italicized text indicates where in the Teal
Club Specific Plan these requirements have
been addressed.
□ A statement of the relationship of
the Specific Plan to the General Plan.
Chapter 9 describes how this Specific Plan
relates to, and is in conformance with, the
goals and objectives of the City of Oxnard
General Plan;
□ The distribution, location, and extent of
land uses. The goals of the proposed Specific
Plan, as defined in Section 1.4, provides the
946
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 1 - Introduction p.11
Teal Club Specific Plan
rationale for the proposed land uses and
their distribution throughout the project site.
Section 3.2 contains a detailed land-use table
(Table 3-1) and precise land use plan (Figure
3-1). The project includes approximately
990 residential units, approximately 8.8
acres commercial mixed-use, approximately
9.1 acres of Business Research uses, and
approximately 17.7 acres of parks and
greenbelts.
□ The distribution, location, and extent
of major infrastructure improvements
needed to support the land uses described
in the plan. Section 4.2 describes the
circulation plan for the site, including street
sections. Potable water, wastewater, and
stormwater infrastructure as well as utilities
are outlined in Section 4.3 of the proposed
Specific Plan.
□ Development standards and criteria.
Section 3.4 and Table 3-4 identifies
development standards. Sections 3.5 through
3.8 identifies project design objectives and
guidelines;
□ A program of phasing and
implementation measures. Chapter 8
identifies implementation and administration
for this Specific Plan.
1.2.2 CITY OF OXNARD ZONING CODE
COMPLIANCE
A key function of the Specific Plan is to
reduce the need for subsequent master
planning and environmental review
procedures as the project area is developed.
The Specific Plan fixes the general layout and
configuration of streets and defines the land
uses allowed in the Specific Plan area. At the
time of subdivision maps will precisely fix
the boundary of the land uses, the location of
streets, and the configuration of residential
lots. After adoption of the Specific Plan,
either by ordinance or resolution, a Specific
Plan supplements existing zoning regulations
and has an effect similar to the local General
Plan. For example, the California Subdivision
Map Act requires the legislative body to deny
approval of a tentative or final subdivision
map if it is not in substantial conformance
with the applicable specific plan. In addition,
a development agreement between a
municipal body and a developer/applicant
cannot be approved unless the legislative
body finds the agreement is consistent with
the General Plan and any applicable specific
plans.
1.3 PROJECT SITE LOCATION
1.3.1 PHYSICAL SETTING
The Teal Club Specific Plan area project site
is located in the western portion of Oxnard;
Ventura County, California. A majority of the
site is currently outside of the City limits and
will require annexation to the City of Oxnard.
The plan area is surrounded by the City of
Oxnard on three sides and a mix of existing
development uses on the north, east, and
south, with County agricultural uses to the
west. The site is bounded by existing roads
on all sides: Ventura Road to the east, Teal
Club Road to the south, Patterson Road to
the west, and Doris Avenue to the north. The
Oxnard Airport is located immediately to
the south of the project. The project site and
surrounding land uses are shown on Figure
1-3.
The Teal Club Specific Plan project area
is within the City of Oxnard Sphere of
Influence and inside the Oxnard “City Urban
Restriction Boundaries” (CURB) boundary
of the City. As a result of this location the
947
p.12 Introduction
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 1-1 REGIONAL LOCATION & CURB BOUNDARIES
PROJECT
Doris Ave.
Channel Islands
Blvd.
Rose Ave.
Gonzales Rd.
Vineyard Ave.
Patterson Rd.
Wooley Rd.
Fifth St.
Victoria Ave.
Teal Club Rd.
Ventura Rd.
Fifth St.
Oxnard Blvd.
Oxnard Blvd.
101 FWY
City of Port Hueneme
Oxnard Airport
City Urban Restriction Boundaries (CURB)
Existing City Limit
0 4000’
948
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 1 - Introduction p.13
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 1-2 Existing Site - Assessor Parcels
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
183-0-070-140 - Borchard
183-0-070-125
Kawaguchi
183-0-070-135 - Kohara
TEAL CLUB RD.
DORIS AVE.
183-0-070-240 - Borchard 183-0-070-060
Borchard
183-0-070-070
Borchard
183-0-070-110 - Basso
0’ 500’
949
p.14 Introduction
Teal Club Specific Plan
Specific Plan area is not within an area
subject to either City of Oxnard or Ventura
County “Save Open Space and Agricultural
Resources” (SOAR) voter approval. The
CURB boundary is shown on Figure 1-1.
1.3.2 EXISTING LAND USES & ON-SITE
CHARACTERISTICS
The proposed project site encompasses
seven parcels totaling 149.72 acres of land,
including the following APN #’s (illustrated
in Figure 1-2):
□ 183-0-070-060;
□ 183-0-070-070;
□ 183-0-070-240;
□ 183-0-070-110;
□ 183-0-070-125;
□ 183-0-070-135;
□ 183-0-070-140.
The site’s topography is primarily flat and
characterized by row crop areas with primary
drainage trending from north to south.
Utilities
There are no existing public utilities within
the Teal Club Specific Plan area. Along all
Teal Club Rd. Looking WestTeal Cl ub R d. L ooking W est four streets that surround the plan area
there are utilities and infra-structure that
serve existing development within the City
of Oxnard. The four streets are Teal Club
Road on the south, Patterson Road on the
west, Doris Avenue on the north, and Ventura
Road on the east. Southern California Edison
local service and/or distribution lines exist
on Teal Club, Patterson, and Ventura Roads.
Southern California Gas distribution lines are
located in Teal Club Road, Doris Avenue, and
Ventura Road. City of Oxnard water lines
exist in Teal Club Road, Doris Avenue, and
Ventura Road; a reclaimed water line is in
Ventura Road. City of Oxnard sewer mains
are located in Patterson and Ventura Roads.
The only storm drainage facilities in the
immediate area are varying depth agricultural
open drains; the most substantial one is
located on the north side of Teal Club Road.
Historical Use & Preservation
The majority of the Teal Club property has
been used for commercial farming operations
for the past 50 years or longer and is actively
farmed today. Farming activities have
historically included various row crops, citrus
and avocado trees.
A farm house and related
out-buildings are located
near the northeast corner of
the site and will be evaluated
for historical significance
through the Environmental
Impact Report.
Biology
Due to many years of crop
production, most of the
ground surface has been
950
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 1 - Introduction p.15
Teal Club Specific Plan
Ventura Rd. Looking North at Beverly Dr.Ventura Rd. Looking Nor th a t Beverl y Dr.
Patterson Rd. Looking NorthPatterson Rd. Looking North
Doris Ave. Looking WestDoris Ave. Looking West
951
p.16 Introduction
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 1-3 Surrounding Land Uses
`
PA 5
PA 2
PA 1
PA 10
PA 11 PA 11
PA 13 PA 13 PA 14
PA 12
PA 9
PA 8
PA 4
PA 3
PA 7
PA 6
PA 6
Agriculture
Residential
Commercial
Residential
Airport
Residential
Industrial
Agriculture
(not a part)
0’ 500’
952
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 1 - Introduction p.17
Teal Club Specific Plan
`
PA 5
PA 1
PA 10
PA 11 PA 11
PA 13PA 13 PA 14
PA 12
PA 9
PA 8
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
Park
Business Research Park
General Commercial
Mixed Use
Residential Medium-High
Residential Medium
Residential Low Medium
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
Stormwater Treatment &
Detention Basin
Transit Hub
Note: Teal Club Plan is
designated as a City of
Oxnard Urban Village
Beverly Drive
Coronado Place
Figure 1-4 Land Use Plan
0’ 500’
Detached Cluster
Townhome
Townhome Apartment
Apartment
Detached Cluster
Attached CondoAttached Condo
/Condo
/Condo
953
p.18 Introduction
Teal Club Specific Plan
1.4.2 GOAL #2: INTEGRATE THE NEW
COMMUNITY WITHIN THE EXISTING
NEIGHBORHOOD.
Objectives:
□ Provide development and transitional
land use patterns that do not conflict with
surrounding land uses or neighborhoods.
□ Avoid leapfrog development and
accommodate projected growth
in a location adjacent to existing
infrastructure, urban services, existing
circulation elements and community
facilities.
□ Establish development regulations to
ensure residential neighborhoods are
compatible with the surrounding area
and all proposed land uses are properly
integrated or buffered, as appropriate.
□ Provide an adequate buffer between the
project area and agricultural uses to the
west on both an interim and permanent
basis, as needed.
□ Provide bike and trail linkages between
the project area and existing facilities.
□ Provide land for a potential fire station or
sub-station, if determined necessary.
disturbed and very little native vegetation
remains within the farmed areas. The site
does not contain any suitable habitat areas or
features other than the few ornamental trees
located near existing structures and along
Ventura Road.
1.4 PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES
1.4.1 GOAL #1: CREATE A COMPREHENSIVE
URBAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
THE TEAL CLUB PROJECT AREA.
Objectives:
□ Create an integrated land, transportation,
and infrastructure plan that allows for
a mix of residential, mixed-use and
commercial development to minimize the
need for short distance vehicle trips both
within the project and within the City.
□ Provide a balance and economic match,
to the extent feasible, between on-
site housing and nearby employment
opportunities.
□ Create an integrated vehicular, pedestrian
and bicycle circulation system that
connects residential, industrial and
commercial uses within the project.
□ Establish land uses that permit a range
of housing opportunities with varying
densities, types, styles, prices and tenancy
characteristics including compliance with
the 2030 General Plan Housing Element
requirements.
□ Adopt design guidelines and regulations
to provide for consistent and orderly
implementation of the plan.
954
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 1 - Introduction p.19
Teal Club Specific Plan
1.4.3 GOAL #3: CREATE A FISCALLY
RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY.
Objectives:
□ Provide a mix of land uses that are
financially independent, sustainable, and
not a fiscal burden on the General Fund of
the City of Oxnard.
□ Ensure appropriate phasing and financing
for community facilities including street
and road improvements, water, urban
runoff and flood control facilities and
parks.
□ Create neighborhoods with lasting
value by setting high quality standards
for residential and commercial land
development and related public
improvements.
□ Development shall comply with the State
of California’s “Build it Green” standards.
1.5 SCOPE & FORMAT
The Teal Club Specific Plan is divided into the
following chapters:
□ Chapter 1 - Introduction: This section
provides an overview of the project and
describes the purpose and intent of the
Specific Plan document.
□ Chapter 2 - Sustainable Community:
this section addresses how the Teal Club
Specific Plan sets standards for addressing
climate change and SB 375 compliance.
□ Chapter 3 - Community Development:
This section establishes the design
objectives, guidelines and development
standards associated with the project.
□ Chapter 4 - Infrastructure and
Community Services: This section
identifies the on- and off-site necessary
infrastructure that link the project to the
surrounding city.
□ Chapter 5 - Environmental Resources:
Working in conjunction with Chapter
2 - Sustainable Community, this section
provides information on the stewardship
of additional environmental resources.
□ Chapter 6 - Safety and Hazards: This
section discusses the compatibility with
adjacent uses and safety issues.
□ Chapter 7 - Housing Section: This section
establishes the Urban Village concept and
affordable housing requirements of the
project.
□ Chapter 8 - Implementation: This section
provides detailed information on the
phasing plan, administration and Specific
Plan processes.
□ Chapter 9 - General Plan Consistency:
This section identifies how the Specific
Plan relates to, and is in conformance
with, the applicable goals and objectives
identified in the City of Oxnard General
Plan.
955
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.20 Sustainable Community
Teal Club Specific Plan
2.2.1 JOBS & HOUSING PROXIMITY
In addition to creating a balance of jobs and
housing within and near the planning area,
the Teal Club Specific Plan is located near
major employment centers including Naval
Base Ventura County, the Port of Hueneme
and major commercial areas.
2.2.2 TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
The Teal Club Specific Plan is located directly
adjacent to Ventura Road, a Gold Coast
transit corridor, and will include an on-site
public transit stop. Gold Coast provides
direct service from the Teal Club Specific
Plan area to major employment centers at the
Esplanade, Naval Base Ventura County and
Oxnard College, with connecting Gold Coast
service throughout the city and connections
to the Ventura County Transportation
Commission (VCTC) Highway 101 Corridor
route to Ventura, Camarillo and Thousand
Oaks. The Oxnard Transportation Center
is only 1.25 to 1.75 miles from the entire site
via connecting bus service or pedestrian
sidewalks and provides Metrolink and
Amtrak service. East of the Specific Plan area
the City of Oxnard Bicycle Facilities Master
Plan map identifies existing Class II bike
lanes on Doris Avenue and recommended
Class II future bike lanes on Fifth Street,
also providing access to the Oxnard
Transportation Center.
2.2.3 INTEGRATED LAND USES
A variety of land use types are included
within the Specific Plan including various
residential densities, retail, commercial
and open space uses. The uses are all
interconnected with trails, sidewalks, and
bikeways to minimize the number of vehicle
miles traveled. Figure 4-11 illustrates the
onsite Bike Path Circulation Plan.
2 SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY
2.1 OVERVIEW
This chapter specifically focuses on
issues relating to climate change and the
implementation of SB 375. Consistent
with the organization of the General Plan,
additional sustainability issues are addressed
in Chapter 5 - Environment Resources.
The Teal Club Specific Plan approaches
sustainability as a holistic process.
Sustainability begins with site selection, takes
form through planning and construction and
is completed with testing and monitoring.
The Teal Club Specific Plan’s sustainability
goal is to create a “low impact” community
that effectively balances resources and
provides for long-term sustainability.
Technologies are rapidly evolving and
this plan does not intend to preclude new,
efficient options to achieve sustainability.
2.2 LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION
The first step toward sustainability is site
selection. The Teal Club site is ideally located
adjacent to established infrastructure with
convenient access to public transportation,
schools, bike paths, major arterials,
employment centers, and shopping. This
location will help minimize vehicle miles
traveled.
956
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 2 - Sustainable Community p.21
2.2.4 DENSITY
The site’s location on a transit corridor
provides an opportunity for compact
development with increased residential
densities in appropriate locations near the
transit stop.
2.3 ENERGY GENERATION &
CONSERVATION
2.3.1 SOLAR ENERGY & TITLE 24
All newly constructed buildings within
the Teal Club Specific Plan area shall be
equipped with solar panels and meet all
applicable State of California energy-
conservation requirements of Title 24 at the
time of issuance of building permits. All
development within the Teal Club Specific
Plan shall comply with the California
Energy Commission rules and requirements
applicable at the time of issuance of building
permits.
2.3.2 BEYOND GREEN CODE
The intent of the Teal Club Specific Plan is
to create a community that meets current
sustainable building standards. To achieve
this, it is required that all new construction
receive “Greenpoint” ratings through
the California “Build It Green” program
or a similar program that quantifies and
documents green building standards.
2.3.3 PEV CHARGING STATIONS
Detached residential units shall be wired to
allow for charging plug-in electric vehicles.
Multi-family and commercial buildings shall
provide for shared PEV charging stations.
2.4 GHG MITIGATIONS
The primary greenhouse gas (GHG)
mitigations are addressed in the compact,
walkable design, proximity to public transit
and requirements for “green” building
practices of the Teal Club Specific Plan.
Additional strategies to reduce GHG in the
environment include:
2.4.1 URBAN FORESTRY
In addition to the aesthetic benefits to the
community, planting trees has a number
of beneficial results. Trees and vegetation
temporarily sequester carbon dioxide
and reduce other air pollutants. When
strategically located, trees can also provide
shading that reduces electrical use and
minimizes potential heat island effects. The
landscaping guidelines of the Teal Club
Specific Plan, outlined in Section 3.7.7,
encourage maximizing the number of trees
selected for minimal maintenance and
planted strategically for shade.
The neighborhood park, storm-water
detention basins, agricultural buffers,
vegetated swales and other landscaped areas
will also be utilized for carbon sequestration.
2.4.2 OTHER GHG EMISSIONS
A number of additional strategies are
included in the design and operation of the
Teal Club Specific Plan to minimize GHG
impacts and are quantified in the project EIR
and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
957
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.22 Sustainable Community
Teal Club Specific Plan
Construction
During the construction phases of the
project, exhaust emissions reductions
will be required. These include the use
of alternative fuel, electric equipment,
diesel particulate filters, diesel oxidation
catalysts, and new tier engines. Fugitive
dust emissions reductions including
construction site watering is required. The
Teal Club Specific Plan EIR Mitigation
Monitoring Program shall provide
documentation of best practices to reduce
emissions and impacts.
Architectural Coatings
Low volatile organic compound
(VOC) coatings are required in all new
construction.
Water
As discussed in the Infrastructure section
of the Specific Plan, the potable water
is sourced and treated locally, thereby
reducing indirect GHGs. “Advanced
Water Purification System” water will be
delivered to the site through the City of
Oxnard existing Ventura Road water lines
and utilized throughout the project site.
Waste
Mandatory city recycling and green waste
composting programs will be implemented
throughout the project in compliance with
City of Oxnard requirements throughout
the life of the project.
958
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 2 - Sustainable Community p.23
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
959
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.24 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Element with the inclusion of the Teal Club
Specific Plan development. It is the only
undeveloped site of its size within the Sphere
of Influence and within the CURB boundary
surrounded on three sides by industrial,
residential and commercial land uses and
adjacent to all municipal services. The site
therefore provides an excellent location for
a planned, orderly and efficient extension of
existing urban development.
The Teal Club Specific Plan site is unique
in that it is on an existing public transit
corridor, adequately served by the City’s
existing sewer and water system and within
walking distance of a variety of retail stores
and support services. The city and county
have an extensive agricultural land protection
program that precludes local agencies from
re-zoning the county’s agricultural land
without a public vote to allow land use
changes to non-agricultural uses. When
voters approved the city’s Save Open Space
and Agricultural Resources (SOAR) initiative
in 1998, the Teal Club site was specifically
located inside the urban growth boundary
(CURB). The Ventura County SOAR initiative
has been extended by voter approval to 2050.
This county-wide land use policy continues
the protection of agricultural resources and
requires local planning agencies to consider
how to best utilize the remaining infill
properties to meet the housing needs of the
coming decades. The Teal Club Specific Plan
is intended to establish a land use plan that
provides for future housing needs while being
compatible with the existing surrounding
land use and development patterns.
The project land Uses are listed in Table 3-1;
the Land Use Plan is illustrated in Figure
3-1; A statistical summary of the land uses is
provided in Table 3-2
3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
3.1 PLANNING CONTEXT
The Teal Club Specific Plan site is one of the
last major properties located within the City
of Oxnard Sphere of Influence, established by
the Ventura County Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO), and the City Urban
Restriction Boundary (CURB) and has been
designated for urban growth for many years.
Figure 1-1 illustrates the CURB boundary and
existing City of Oxnard boundary.
The Specific Plan land use conforms to the
City’s 2030 General Plan land use and density
designation for the site. The City of Oxnard
General Plan 2013-2021 Housing Element
identifies the Teal Club Specific Plan site
for development, and the 2021-2029 Draft
Housing Element anticipates development
of the Teal Club Specific Plan site. The State
of California Department of Housing &
Community Development (HCD) approved
the 2013-2021 City of Oxnard Housing
960
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chapt er 3 - Community Development p.25
3.2 LAND USE PLAN
The Teal Club Specific Plan envisions a
pedestrian-oriented village that links to the
existing adjacent community and provides for
distinct residential neighborhoods serving as
an Urban Village and containing a transit hub
and a mix of commercial uses, employment
centers, and public and recreation facilities.
A ten-acre neighborhood park and a 7-plus
acre park will serve new and existing
neighborhoods. Public road improvements,
shared HOA-maintained and operated
private recreational facilities and an east-west
internal multi-use public path are proposed.
The Oxnard School District has purchased
an adjacent 25-acre parcel for the purpose of
constructing K-8 school facilities. The school
parcel is not a part of the Teal Club Specific
Plan and has been evaluated under a separate
EIR certified by the Oxnard School District.
Each residential neighborhood is planned to
be within a half-mile radius of employment
centers and/or neighborhood retail uses.
All neighborhoods will be connected by
pedestrian paths, bike lanes and/or easily-
accessed neighborhood sidewalks. Class I
and Class II bike routes are included within
the Specific Plan area, and all perimeter
streets will include Class I bike lanes,
consistent with the City of Oxnard Bicycle &
Pedestrian Master Plan.
The Specific Plan provides a variety of
housing types and residential densities
including both market-rate and income-
restricted affordable housing within the plan
area. For-sale housing will range from multi-
family units to small lot, single-family homes
on lots up to 3,500 square feet in size. The
variety of housing types and densities will
provide for a wide price range for multiple
household types and incomes to meet a
portion of the future housing needs of the City
of Oxnard.
The Urban Village concept envisions a
highly visible, pedestrian-accessible central
multi-use path to encourage walking and
biking within the community. The Ventura
Road frontage north of Beverly Drive will
contain commercial and retail businesses.
A mixed-use gateway is planned for the
Beverly Drive entry area immediately west of
Ventura Road The retail center and mixed
use area, containing a public plaza, will be
within walking distance to all new residential
neighborhoods and is adjacent to a main line
transit stop for access to nearby employment
centers such as the Esplanade, Naval Base
Ventura County and Channel Islands Harbor.
A business/research park on the south side
of the project would provide another source
of potentially “walkable” jobs within the
planning area.
The centrally-located ten-acre neighborhood
park is intended to be a gathering place and a
healthy activity zone for the entire community.
Concurrent with residential construction of
Phase 1 of the Specific Plan the developers
shall provide 6.5 acres of the ten-acre park and
construct the Phase 1 park improvements as
required by the Phase 1 Development Agreement..
Programming for this park will be determined
by the Oxnard Recreation and Community
Services Department prior to approval of Phase 1
development entitlements. Development of Phase
2 shall provide an additional 3.5 acres, with park
completion as required by future Phase 2 project
Conditions of Approval.
Programming in the ten-acre park will consist
of both active recreation elements (game courts,
game fields and tot lot/playground areas) and
passive recreation elements (benches, sidewalks
961
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.26 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 3-1
Land Use Table
Land Use Maximum
Density
TOTAL PLANNED
Acres
(1) Units (2) Density Bldg. Sq.
Ft.
RESIDENTIAL USES & LAND USE CATEGORY:
PA-1 Detached Cluster - Residential Low Medium 10 DU/Ac. 17.52 140 8 DU/Ac. - PA-2 Detached Cluster - Residential Low Medium 10 DU/Ac. 10.01 80 8 DU/Ac. - SUBTOTAL Detached Cluster Units - 27.53 220 - -
PA-3 Attached or Detached Townhome - Residential Medium 18 DU/Ac. 9.6 145 15 DU/Ac. - PA-4 Attached or Detached Townhome - Residential Medium 18 DU/Ac. 5.54 88 16 DU/Ac. - PA-5 Attached Apartment/Condo - Residential Medium High 30 DU/Ac. 10.57 240 23 DU/Ac. - PA-11 Attached or Detached Condo - Residential Low Medium 12 DU/Ac. 15.64 167 11 DU/Ac. - PA-12 Attached Apartment/Condo - Residential Medium High 30 DU/Ac. 4.43 100 23 DU/Ac. - Commercial/Mixed Use (Residential component) - 0.00 30 - - SUBTOTAL Multi-Family - 45.78 770 - -
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL - 73.31 990 - -
PARKS & OPEN SPACE
PA-8 Community Park - Phase 1 Portion - 6.50 0 -
5,000
PA-9 Community Park - Phase 2 Portion - 3.50 0 - -
P
A-10 Community Park - Phase 2 - 7.38 0 - -
Beverly Dr. Greenbelt - 0.38 0 - -
SUBTOTAL Parks & Open Space - 17.76 0 - 5,000
COMMERCIAL/MIXED USE
PA-6 Commercial/Mixed Use - General Commercial - 4.35 0 - 10,000 P
A-7 Village Commercial - General Commercial - 4.43 0 - 45,000 SUBTOT
AL Commercial/Mixed Use - 8.78 0 - 55,000
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
PA-13 Business Research Park - 6.19 0
- 88,000
PA-14 Business Research Park - 2.92 0 - 44,000
SUBTOTAL Light Industrial - 9.11 0 - 132,000
ARTERIAL ROADWAYS
Ventura Road - 2.82 0 - -
Doris Avenue - 2.80 0 - -
Patterson Road - 0.30 0 - -
Teal Club Road - 7.20 0 - -
SUBTOTAL Arterial Roadways - 13.12 0 - -
INTERIOR ROADWAYS & MISC.
Interior Roadways show in Fig 2-1 - 22.18 0 - -
Stormwater Treatment / Detention Basins - 5.46 0 - -
SUBTOTAL Interior Roadways & Misc. - 27.64 0 - -
TOTAL PROJECT - 149.72 990 - 192,000
1. Land Use Acres shown in this table are Net Area, measured from the right-of way line of streets shown in the Teal Club Specific Plan “Precise Land Use Plan”, Figure 2-1.
2. The number of units within any Residential land use area may be refined during the course of subsequent City review and approval, provided that the total number of units within the Specific Plan does not increase beyond that shown in this table, or unless subsequent approval includes a density bonus and additional CEQA review as applicable under State or local law.
962
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chapt er 3 - Community Development p.27 Figure 3-1 Land Use Plan
`
PA 5
PA 1
PA 10
PA 11 PA 11
PA 13PA 13 PA 14
PA 12
PA 9
PA 8
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
Park
Business Research Park
General Commercial
Mixed UseResidential Medium
Residential Low Medium
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
Transit Hub
Beverly Drive
Coronado Place
Detached Cluster
Townhome
Townhome Apartment
Apartment
Detached Cluster
CondominiumCondominium
Stormwater Treatment &
Detention Basin
Note: Teal Club Plan is
designated as a City of
Oxnard Urban Village
0’ 500’
Residential Medium-High
/Condos
/ Condo
963
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.28 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 3-2
Land Use Statistical Summary
Land Use Description Planning Area Acres DU SF % of Total Plan Recreation/Open Space Uses:
Neighborhood Parks PA 8-10 17.38
Greenbelt .38
Recreation/Open Space Subtotal: 17.76 11.9%
Developed Uses:
Mixed-Use, Village Commercial PA 6 & 7 8.78 3055,000
Business Research Park PA 13 & 14 9.11 132,000
Medium-High Density PA 5 & 12 15.0 340
Medium Density PA 3 & 4 15.14 233
Low-Medium Density Residential PA 1,2 & 11 43.17 387
Developed Uses Subtotal: 91.2 990 60.9%
Streets & Misc.:
Arterial Roadways 13.12
Interior Roadways 22.18
Detention Basins/Detention Basins 5.46
Streets & Misc. Subtotal: 40.76 27.2%
Project Total: 149.72 990 192,000 100.00%
5,000
5,000
964
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.29 TABLE 3-3
ZONING
LAND USE DESCRIPTION ZONING DENSITY (DU/AC)
Low-Medium Residential - Detached Cluster R-2 7-12
Low-Medium Residential - Attached or Detached Cluster R-2 7-12 Medium Residential - Attached & Condominium R-3 12-18
Medium-High Density Residential - Apartment/Condo R-4 18-30 Mixed-Use Commercial (1st Floor) C-2 N/A
Mixed-Use Residential (2nd/3rd Floor) C-2 12-18
Village Commercial & CPD Uses CPD N/A
Business Research Park BRP N/A
Park C-R N/A
Greenbelts & Open Space C-R N/A
and small-scale picnic areas). Parking is intended
to be primarily along the perimeter of the park,
in either parallel or angled parking stalls along
the street, in order to maximize the usable park
area. Maintenance of the neighborhood park shall
be funded by a financing district formed by the
developers of the Specific Plan and financed by all
development within the Specific Plan as provided
for in the project Development Agreement(s).
An additional 7.3 acre park is included in Phase
2 at the western edge of the Specific Plan, at the
northeast quadrant of the intersection of Teal Club
Road and Patterson Road. Programming for this
park will be determined by the Oxnard Recreation
and Community Services Department prior to
approval of Phase 2 development entitlements.
Concurrent with construction of Phase 2 of the
Specific Plan the developers shall provide 7.3
acres of land with park completion as required by
future Phase 2 development project Conditions of
Approval.
Maintenance of the Phase 2 neighborhood parks
shall be funded by a financing district formed by
the developers of the Specific Plan and financed
by all developments.
Additional private recreation and common
area open space amenities, including seating
areas, barbecues and picnic tables, shall
be located within the Medium Density
neighborhoods of the plan area. The
Medium-High Density planning area shall
include a pool, seating areas, barbecues and
picnic tables for use by the residents of that
planning area. Collectively these public
and HOA-member private amenities will
ensure that outdoor recreational opportunities
are located within a quarter mile walking
distance of all residential units via the public
multi-use trail and sidewalk network.
965
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.30 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
pedestrian connections in an open, visually
pleasing setting. The Development Standards
are established to provide objective standards
governing development of each of the
Planning Areas. The Development Standards
ensure that each neighborhood is developed
consistent with the Zone Classifications
outlined in Section 3.3 and within the density
range of development in each Planning Area.
For each Zone Classification the Development
Standards define the allowable building
height, setback requirements and other
standards to be met in site planning for each
Planning Area.
Any deviations from these standards in
the residential Zone Classifications shall
require approval of a Residential Planned
Development (RPD) Permit as defined in
City of Oxnard Municipal Code Section 16-
450. In the BRP and Commercial/Mixed Use
areas a Development Design Review Permit
is required for any deviations from these
standards. The Setback Requirements of this
Specific Plan shall be applied as the minimum
requirements for projects within the Specific
Plan, unless modified by an RPD Permit.
The City of Oxnard Municipal Code shall
regulate development in the Teal Club
Specific Plan, except as modified by the
Specific Plan text, conditions, regulations
and standards contained herein. In such
cases where Teal Club Specific Plan text,
conditions, regulations and standards conflict
with those in sections contained in the City
of Oxnard Municipal Code, the Teal Club
Specific Plan text, conditions, regulations and
standards shall apply.
3.5 DESIGN OVERVIEW
This section discusses and expands upon the
development plan identified in Section 2. The
design philosophy and objectives outline the
3.3 PROPOSED ZONE
CLASSIFICATIONS & INCLUSIONARY
HOUSING
3.3.1 ZONE CLASSIFICATIONS
Table 3-3 defines zoning classifications
proposed within the Specific Plan area. In
categories where this plan does not establish
or define standards, the standards of the City
of Oxnard Zoning Ordinance shall apply.
All uses within the zoning classifications of
this Specific Plan shall be consistent with
those allowed in Chapter 16 of the Oxnard
Municipal Code. Special Use Permits shall be
allowed as defined in Section 8 of this Specific
Plan
3.3.2 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING
The Teal Club Specific Plan includes a
range of housing types. Chapter 7 provides
additional housing information. In
accordance with the Housing Element
of the City’s General Plan and the Urban
Village criteria, the Teal Club Specific Plan
residential component will require that
15% of the total residential development is
Affordable Housing for very low and lower-
income workforce households (defined as
Very Low and Low Income Households).
Affordable Housing Agreements shall
be executed and covenants recorded as
necessary to insure that all Affordable
Housing units within the Specific Plan remain
affordable for a period of 55 years.
3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Table 3-4 defines the Development Standards
for the Teal Club Specific Plan. An overall
objective of this Specific Plan is to create a
walkable neighborhood with highly visible
966
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.31
3.6.1 PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED DESIGN
OBJECTIVES
The pedestrian-oriented design objectives
play a significant part in defining this Specific
Plan by facilitating direct connections
between the individual residential
neighborhoods, commercial and mixed-use,
and business research developments. The
design guidelines reinforce the Urban Village
and small town image through the emphasis
of architecture, landscaping, and hardscape
elements at the pedestrian level.
The entire project site is interconnected by
sidewalks along public streets, pedestrian
and multi-use paths, and bike lanes on major
public streets. Public plazas and gathering
places in the residential and mixed-use
areas are easily accessed by the pedestrian
network to enhance the walking experience.
A few minutes of walking will take residents
and workers anywhere within the proposed
project. A bus stop and shelter for the Gold
Coast Transit Ventura Road route is located
at the project entry intersection of Ventura
Road and Beverly Drive. The pedestrian
circulation plan is illustrated in Figure 3-2.
For street design cross-section dimensions
see Section 4.2, Figure 4-2 to Figure 4-10.
Various traffic calming methods shall be
utilized in the planning area including
“chokers” at local and collector street
intersections with crosswalks, clearly defined
to promote pedestrian movement between
the neighborhoods. Roundabouts or traffic
circles may be incorporated into local
and collector streets and private drives to
reduce traffic speeds, promote even traffic
flows, and provide safe crossing locations
for pedestrians. Landscape within the
roundabouts aim to soften the visual impact
of roadways and reduce the dominance of
automobiles in the pedestrian context.
Urban Village design of the Teal Club Specific
Plan area. The design guidelines establish
concepts and the range of features to be
considered in the design of future residential,
commercial, mixed-use and industrial land
uses. These guidelines can be implemented
in a variety of ways and are written to provide
architectural flexibility and encourage
diversity in architecture.
3.6 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY &
OBJECTIVES
The Teal Club Specific Plan seeks to create
a new community that carefully integrates
multiple land uses in a walkable setting.
The entire plan area is linked together
by the east /west multi-use trail, Class II
bike lanes, and neighborhood sidewalks.
The design incorporates Urban Village
concepts with an emphasis on highly-visible
pedestrian routes and the interconnection
of residential neighborhoods, community-
serving commercial uses, recreational
opportunities, the adjacent Oxnard School
District educational facilities and on-site
public transportation access. The bike path
circulation plan is illustrated in Figure 4-11.
The Teal Club Specific Plan encourages
commercial spaces and residential
neighborhoods with a strong sense of identity
through planning and landscape architecture
emphasizing the Mediterranean climate as
well as architecture that complements the
design character of Coastal California. To
accomplish this, the design guidelines for
the project draw heavily from neighborhoods
having stood the test of time and known for
their beauty and ambiance, particularly the
Henry T. Oxnard Historic District in the
nearby Wilson Neighborhood and the older
coastal residential neighborhoods of Santa
Barbara and Carpinteria, California.
967
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.32 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 3-4
Development Standards Summary
Zoning
R-2
Detached
Cluster
R-2
Attached
Condo
R-3 R-4 Mixed
Use C-2 BRP
Maximum Density 12 12 18 30 18 N/A N/A
Maximum Height 30 ft.1 30 ft. 1 45 ft.1 50 ft. 1 45 ft. 1 35 ft. 1 35 ft.
Minimum Lot Area 2,500 sf N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,000 sf 20,000 sf Minimum Lot Frontage 40 ft. 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 100 ft.
Minimum Lot Width 40 ft. 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 100 ft.
Minimum Lot Depth 50 ft. 2 N/A N/A N/A 100 ft. N/A 100 ft.
Private Open Space 150 ft.3 150 sf 3 100 sf 3 50 sf 3 50 sf 3 N/A N/A Set-back Requirements
Front Building 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 15 ft. 0 ft. 10 ft. 30 ft.
Front Porch 10 ft. 10 ft. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Garage 18 ft.4 3 ft. 3 ft. 3 ft. N/A N/A N/A
Side 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft./story 5 ft./story 5 ft. Equal to bldg height
Rear 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft./story 5 ft./story 15 ft. 20 ft.
Front-to-Front 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 30 ft. 25 ft. N/A N/A Patio Cover 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. N/A 5 ft. N/A N/A
Footnotes:
1. Additional height allowed subject to approval of a Special Use Permit and conformance with FAA requirements.
2. Decreased dimension allowed subject to approval of a Special Use Permit.
3. Private Open Space defined as residential unit patio, porch and / or balcony with a six-foot by six-foot minimum dimension.
4. Garage set-back must be greater than the building set-back from street frontage property line.
5. Development within PA8 park area would be subject to C-2 Zone Standards.
General Note: Allowed uses within all zoning classifications shall be consistent with those allowed or conditionally allowed by Chapter 16 of the City of Oxnard Municipal Code. All projects within the Specific Plan require Development Design Review. In addition, approval of a Special Use Permit shall be required for any conditionally allowed uses or any deviations from the Development Standards within the Specific Plan. Any deviations from the Residential Development Standards of this Specific Plan require approval of a Residential Planned Development (RPD) Permit as defined in City of Oxnard Municipal Code Division 12 Residential Planned Unit Developments. The Setback Requirements of this Specific Plan shall be applied as the minimum requirements for projects within the Specific Plan, unless modified by an Special Use Permit. Such conditions that concern numerical standards shall not increase or decrease by more than 25 percent the requirements that apply in the basic zone.
Note: Overall developed residential building footprint coverage of the Specific Plan cannot exceed 25% of the total residential area of the Specific Plan, calculated inclusive of streets, paved areas, parks, landscape, open space and private yards, in accordance with the Oxnard Airport Master Plan. Commercial and Industrial uses cannot exceed 50% building footprint coverage of the total Commercial and Industrial use areas. 5 968
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chapt er 3 - Community Development p.33 PA 5
PA 8
PA 9
PA 1
PA 11 PA 11
PA 10
PA 13 PA 13 PA 14
PA 12
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
Transit Hub
Multi-Use Trail
0’ 500’
Figure 3-2 Pedestrian Circulation
Primary Sidewalk
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
NOTE:
(See Figure 4-11 for Bike Path information)
969
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.34 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
3.6.2 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES
The primary residential design objective is
to use Urban Village design concepts and
architecture to create effective and balanced
pedestrian-oriented environments.
Residential uses make up approximately
50 percent of the Specific Plan area. Within
the residential planning areas, three land
use densities are allowed: Low-Medium,
Medium, and Medium-High density. In
accordance with the City’s General Plan, these
designations allow maximum densities of 12,
18, and 30 units per acre, respectively. Within
each of these land use density neighborhoods,
the design guidelines allow for several
styles of architecture. The development
guidelines for Low-Medium and Medium
residential land uses require a minimum of
three separate floor plans and four distinct
exterior elevations for each neighborhood.
These design variations promote visual and
aesthetic interest within these residential
communities. Medium-High residential
land uses require that a single, uniform
architectural style be implemented for
each individual project; each project shall
be architecturally distinct in this land use
category. This approach will create a sense
of unique identity and character for each
multi-family attached development with the
Specific Plan.
3.6.3 URBAN VILLAGE & MIXED-USE
COMMERCIAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES
The primary urban village and mixed-
use design objective is to ensure that the
Specific Plan provides appropriately scaled
commercial projects that serve the needs of
full-time residents and daytime employees. In
this context the term “mixed-use commercial”
applies to retail, office, and restaurant uses
along Ventura Road and near the Ventura
Road and Beverly Drive intersection. Diverse
neighborhood retail uses and professional
office space encourage a walkable “park once”
strategy that further reduces dependency on
automobiles within the project.
A central public plaza will serve as a
community hub along Beverly Drive and
will anchor the Urban Village. The plaza
will be located westerly of the Ventura
Road intersection to minimize roadway
noise impacts. Buildings near the plaza
shall activate the public realm by including
outdoor dining and recreational activities to
create a vibrant social and cultural character
consistent with the Coastal California
motif. The plaza area shall have a minimum
dimension of 100’ in any direction and
include both fixed perimeter seating and a
central multi-function area for neighborhood
arts and cultural use. The public plaza will
include an identity feature that will further
define the space. A conceptual illustration for
the plaza and typical proposed features are
provided in Figure 3-3.
The mixed-use area will include creative,
contemporary architectural references to
“Traditional” or “Spanish Colonial Revival”
building design as described in Section
3.7 of this Specific Plan. The buildings and
garden spaces of this area shall be linked
by sidewalks and landscaping that visually
reduce the dominance of required parking
within the site. Patios or courtyards shall be
included within this area and clearly-defined
pedestrian access throughout the mixed
use area shall be provided. A portion of the
commercial parking shall be provided in
parking lots clustered away from public street
view and with consideration for shared use by
daytime and evening functions.
970
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chapt er 3 - Community Development p.35 The mixed-use area may include residential
units in either a vertical or horizontal mixed-
use setting. The transition between land
use types shall be emphasized by landscape
and hardscape features that encourage
interaction, yet provide adequate separation
for all uses. Residential units shall include
patios or private decks. Buildings in this area
will not exceed three stories, in keeping with
the moderate-intensity character of the site
and the adjacent community.
3.6.4 BUSINESS RESEARCH PARK DESIGN
OBJECTIVES
The Specific Plan proposes approximately 9.1
acres of land designated for business research
park uses. These uses are located along the
southern perimeter of the planning area
and provide a buffer from industrial zoning
and uses along the south side of Teal Club
Road and the Oxnard Airport. This area will
serve as an employment center and provide
smaller, light industrial business spaces
linked to the surrounding community by the
sidewalk network and Class I & II bike lanes,
both within the Specific Plan and on the
perimeter streets.
The design objective of this business research
area is to create a distinct sense of place and
an extension of the walkable community
context established throughout the rest of
the Specific Plan area. Direct connection to
bike lanes and easily accessible sidewalks
encourage the interaction and creativity
essential to a healthy workplace. Patios and
small-scale open spaces shall be included
within each industrial site at locations
that encourage frequent use and allow for
connection to the Specific Plan pedestrian
and bike lane network. The design
consistency and attention to both landscape
function and architectural form are intended
to provide a clear identity for the industrial
area while creating a valuable economic and
job-creation resource for the City of Oxnard.
The land use ranges allowed for this area
shall be consistent with the City of Oxnard
Business Research Park (BRP) Zone
Classification.
The architectural character of the business
research area shall not be limited to the
range of styles identified in the residential
section of the Specific Plan, but shall allow
for contemporary themes that can more
effectively serve the needs and express the
identities of the anticipated users.
The business research buildings shall
incorporate both passive and active energy-
saving technologies and design. Photovoltaic
Solar Panels shall be required within this
planning area. Buildings are to be located
near the Teal Club Road frontage and a
minimum of 40 percent of tenant parking
is to be clustered in parking areas away
from major public street view to the extent
practical in site design. Up to 60 percent of
required parking shall be allowed between
Teal Club Road and the building frontage in
private parking lots. Outdoor storage is not
allowed with the BRP zone. Loading areas
and other service functions shall be effectively
screened from public view to enhance the
visual character of the area. A 20-foot wide
landscape buffer and 8-foot high slumpstone
block wall separating the residential street
from the BRP area shall be incorporated in
to the site design as shown in Figure 3-4.
Buildings in the BRP zone shall not exceed
35’ in total height, including required
mechanical equipment screening and are
subject to any additional Oxnard Airport
height and lighting limitations.
971
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.36 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 3-3 Central Public Plaza
Ventura Road
Beverly Drive
Multi-Purpose
Trail
Central Plaza
Public Space
Bus Shelter
972
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.37 Figure 3-3 Central Public Plaza
Beverly Drive
Central Plaza
Public Space
TurfMulti-
Purpose
Trail
Outdoor
Seating
973
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.38 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 3-4 BRP Landscape Buffer
30’
R.O.W.
65’
StreetParkway &
Stormwater
Retention
BRP
Building
ParkingTeal Club
Road
60’ 20’ 66’
R.O.W.
8’ Wall
Residence
974
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.39 Teal Club Specific Plan
3.6.5 OPEN SPACE DESIGN OBJECTIVES
The design objective of the Specific Plan
open space areas is to ensure an integrated
plan addressing recreational and aesthetic
issues. All run-off from the project will be
captured and treated to the standards of
the Environmental Protection Agency and
Regional Water Quality Control Board
through a series of bio-swales, filtration
ponds, and other vegetated treatment
systems. Plant materials selected for the
drainage network shall consist of native
species and selected adaptive plant materials
appropriate for both habitat and visual
enhancement for either upland, transitional,
or wetland locations. Approximately
5.4 acres of Stormwater Treatment and
Detention Basins are proposed within the
overall Specific Plan area.
Additional open space within the plan
area includes approximately 17.7 acres
of parks and greenbelts. These sites are
intended to provide for the recreational
needs of the residents of the plan area in an
interconnected network of paths, trails, and
sidewalks.
The neighborhood park and recreation
facilities shall be designed and programmed
in cooperation with the Oxnard Recreation
and Community Services Department to
ensure that the widest possible range of
neighborhood-compatible outdoor activities
are provided within the planning area.
3.7 DESIGN GUIDELINES
3.7.1 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
This section provides the overall design
guidelines for residential and other land uses
within this Specific Plan area. Architecture
is a key component of the appearance of the
Specific Plan area. The design guidelines
outlined in the following sections provide
general design criteria and promote
visual compatibility while allowing for
individuality and architectural diversity. Four
architectural styles form the basis for these
design guidelines: Craftsman, Traditional,
Spanish Colonial Revival, and Monterey (see
Figures 3.5-3.8). Creative, contemporary
interpretation of these styles is strongly
encouraged. All homes shall provide solar
panels and be pre-wired to accommodate
electric vehicle plug-in portals.
The architectural styles chosen have
remained popular over time and are
consistent with the prevailing history and
design character of the region and the nearby
Oxnard Historic District. They are intended
to provide direction to the architect, while
allowing latitude in the interpretation of the
style. The styles represented are not intended
to be prescriptive, but are intended to provide
inspiration and encouragement. Additional
architectural styles may be considered,
subject to approval by the Development
Services Director. Contemporary themed
architectural styles are recommended in the
Specific Plan Business Research use planning
areas.
975
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.40 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Craftsman - Figure 3-5
Unique characteristics of the Craftsman style include rustic texture of building materials, broad overhangs with exposed rafter tails at the eaves, and often extensive pergolas and trellises over large porches at the lower level. Roofs are low-pitched and gabled with wide unenclosed eave overhangs. Windows are often combined into horizontal groupings and are surrounded by wide and carefully detailed wood or other appropriate trim.
Elements Description
Roof □ One and three-story structures (four-story allowed in Medium-High Density).
□ Low-pitched gable roofs with wide unenclosed eave overhangs. □ Multiple roof planes.
□ Decorative beams or braces under gable.
□ Exposed, profiled rafter tails or fascia board set eaves, and simple wide bargeboards with trim at rakes (no stucco soffits).
□ Flat concrete or slate tile roofs.
Windows □ Vertical and square windows combined into horizontal groupings. □ Divided lites in upper sashes of single- or double-hung windows. □ Surrounded by wide and carefully detailed wood or other appropriate trim.
□ Window dormers with gable or shed roof.
Wall
Materials
□ Wide, horizontal wood siding or smooth stucco.
□ Frequent use of natural or simulated cobblestone and river rock. □ Occasional use of brick at base of wall or porch.
□ Rubble stone faux chimneys.
□ Use of natural materials such as redwood, tile, and stone. □ Exposed wooden balconies.
□ Trellis porch or porte-cochere.
Architectural
Elements
□ Tapered wood posts set on rectangular or tapered masonry piers. □ Exposed wood beams and brackets, profiled at the ends. □ Extensive use of gabled porches.
□ Band sawed and pierced ornamentation in the wood railings.
Colors □ Brown rich contrasting accents.
□ Lighter whites, grays, flat blues, earthy greens, and yellows. 976
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.41 Craftsman - Figure 3-5
977
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.42 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Traditional - Figure 3-6
Unique features of the Traditional style draw on forms and details from the early ancestral homes along the Atlantic seaboard of Colonial America. Creative touches of wood and horizontal siding define the Traditional style, which is identified by simple one and two story rectangular boxes with a primary front to back side-gabled roof. Hip roofs tend to occur at the first story roof lines associated with porch elements.
Elements Description
Roof □ One- or two-story except as deemed appropriate to specific design. □ Flat concrete tile or composition shingle tile .
□ Roof pitches are steeper normally ranging from 5:12 to 7:12. First story porch roofs can have lower pitches of 3:12 to 4:12.
□ Overhangs are typically shallow; 6” – 12” rakes with 12’ – 18” eaves, sometimes with the use of double trim fascia/barge boards.
Windows □ Single hung rectangular multi-paned windows frequently arranged in pairs or stacked at first and second floors.
□ Bay windows.
□ Typically louvered shutters at primary windows – sized to match window openings.
Wall
Materials
□ Stucco.
□ Both horizontal and vertical accent siding is used – board and batten, clapboard and lap siding.
□ Brick or stone is used mostly as a wainscot at the first story or on built- up column/post bases.
Architectural
Elements
□ Accentuated front entry door with pediment and columns or covered front porch.
□ Decorative vents or trusses at gable ends.
□ Wood columns/posts and railing with vertical pickets. □ Simple garage doors.
□ Occasional use of dormer windows.
□ Wood outlookers.
Colors □ White or a variety of brighter, bolder theme colors. □ Typically white/off white trim and fascia/barge board. □ Body siding colors should match the stucco color, however areas of accent siding should be contrasting darker shades or white. □ Deeper, darker shutter and accent colors.
`
978
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.43 Traditional - Figure 3-6
979
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.44 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Spanish Colonial Revival - Figure 3-7
Unique features of the Spanish Colonial Revival style include red tile hipped roofs, ornamental ironwork over windows or on balconies, arcaded porches, ornate low-relief carvings highlighting arches, columns, window surrounds, and parapets. Stone or brick exterior walls often are left exposed or finished in plaster. Windows can be either straight or arched.
Elements Description
Roofs □ One and three-story structures (four-story allowed in Medium-High Density).
□ Low-pitched gabled roof with little or no overhang.
□ Simple hip, gable, and shed forms.
□ Exposed rafter tails or profiled cornice at eaves.
□ No overhang at gables, with tile wrapped over face of wall, with or without profiled cornice and/or stucco soffits.
□ High barrel concrete “S” tile in red colors, or two-piece/high-profile “S” clay tile.
Windows □ Recessed feature windows at façades.
□ Flat, arched, segmental, or half round window heads.
□ No trim typically at heads or jambs of typical openings. □ Stone or simulated cast stone, pre-cast concrete or stucco over foam at accent openings, or at sills of typical openings.
Wall
Materials
□ Smooth finish stucco (no rougher than sand or light lace finish). □ Cut or simulated stone accents.
□ Clay or polyurethane/foam material made to faithfully simulated clay pipe scuppers and vents.
□ Shutters at windows accent windows.
Architectural
Elements
□ Heavy exposed beams.
□ Iron, steel bar block simulating wrought iron, or wood balconies and rails.
□ Masonry, stucco, or wood column and balustrades.
□ Arcades and trellises.
□ Decorative tile insets; decorative wrought iron railings, window treatments, or balconies.
□ Low stucco wall at frontage, enclosing forecourt.
Colors □ White and off-white walls.
□ Dark brown wood.
□ Vibrant paint and tile accents.
980
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.45 Spanish Colonial Revival - Figure 3-7
981
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.46 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Monterey - Figure 3-8
Unique characteristics of the Monterey style include low-pitched roofs with flat concrete tile, usually in tones of browns and brownish terra cotta. The Monterey typically has a prominent second floor covered wood balcony or covered front porch at the façade. Wall surfaces are always stucco and the forms are usually asymmetrical.
Elements Description
Roofs □ One and three-story structures (four-story allowed in Medium-High Density).
□ Low-pitched gabled roof with little or no overhang.
□ Simple hip, gable, and shed forms.
□ Exposed rafter tails or profiled cornice at eaves.
□ No overhang at gables, with tile wrapped over face of wall, with or without profiled cornice and/or stucco soffits.
□ High barrel concrete “S” tile in red colors, or two-piece/high-profile “S” clay tile.
Windows □ Recessed feature windows at façades.
□ Flat, arched, segmental, or half round window heads.
□ No trim typically at heads or jambs of typical openings. □ Stone or simulated cast stone, pre-cast concrete or stucco over foam at accent openings, or at sills of typical openings.
Wall
Materials
□ Smooth finish stucco (no rougher than sand or light lace finish). □ Cut or simulated stone accents.
□ Clay or polyurethane/foam material made to faithfully simulated clay pipe scuppers and vents.
□ Shutters at windows accent windows.
Architectural
Elements
□ Heavy exposed beams.
□ Iron, steel bar block simulating wrought iron, or wood balconies and rails.
□ Masonry, stucco, or wood column and balustrades.
□ Arcades and trellises.
□ Decorative tile insets; decorative wrought iron railings, window treatments, or balconies.
□ Low stucco wall at frontage, enclosing forecourt.
982
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.47 Monterey - Figure 3-8
983
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.48 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Residential General Design Guidelines for Residential Uses Table 3-4 Site Planning □ Orientation of buildings to the street is a fundamental objective of this Specific Plan. In multi-family residential areas, one of the prevalent features shall be an attractive internal pedestrian-oriented circulation system.
□ Street configuration is designed to maintain the majority of automobile traffic on main circulation arteries and limit the volume of automobile traffic on secondary streets.
□ Neighborhood design along main travel arteries should be clustered with interior parking courts, which access off of secondary streets, thus limiting the number and frequency of curb cuts along the main street. □ Parking shall be provided for permitted uses in accordance with the provisions of the Zoning Code. Required parking for residences shall be located and designed in conformance with the development standards and the design guidelines.
3.7.2 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Residential uses include various densities
ranging from R-2 (maximum 7 to 12 dwelling
units per acre), to R-3 (maximum 12 to 18
dwelling units per acre), to R-4 (18 to 30
units per acre). A fundamental planning
principle of this Specific Plan is to incorporate a range of development densities located
within close proximity. Higher densities will
be designed as clustered neighborhoods, with
resident parking and automobile access from
an interior parking court which is accessed off
of secondary streets. This design reduces the
number of curb cuts and automobile activity
on the main streets, improving automobile
circulation and maintaining pedestrian
friendly activity. These higher density clusters
will be located along the main circulation
arteries or near employment centers and
retail services. Less dense residential
development will be oriented away from
the commercial and automobile activity.
This type of clustered neighborhood design
with access and orientation to the street is
consistent with the Traditional Neighborhood
Design Concept proposed for this Specific
Plan.
The following Design Guidelines for this
Specific Plan are consistent with both
the City of Oxnard Zoning Code and the
recommended architectural styles.
General Design Guidelines for Residential
Uses
The following guidelines apply to all
residential development within the Teal Club
Specific Plan area.
984
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.49 Residential General Design Guidelines for Residential Uses Table 3-4 continued Architectural
Details
□ These guidelines define a range of materials, elements, and details required for residential units and site improvements within the Specific Plan area and apply to all architectural styles recommended for residential land uses (see Section 3.7.1 for recommended architectural styles).
Roofs and
Massing
□ Allowable building forms shall be three-and four story for Medium- High, two-and three story massing for Medium Density residential and two-story for the Low-Medium density residential to be accompanied by taller appropriate details, as appropriate for the particular architectural style.
□ Overhanging eaves should be finished with exposed rafter tails or a cornice, as appropriate for the selected architectural style. The minimum dimension of exposed rafter tails should be three inches. □ Skylights should be flat (non-bubble) only.
□ Gutters should be painted galvanized steel or painted aluminum.
Allowed gutter shapes are half round and ogee.
□ Roofing materials should be concrete barrel or flat tile or high-quality composite materials.
□ The roofing material for each house or building should be consistent with the selected architectural style, as specified in the architectural styles (Section 3.7.1) of these guidelines.
Doors and
Windows
□ Exterior doors and windows should be made of wood, vinyl clad wood, vinyl, or metal.
□ Window glass should be clear glass with not more than 10 percent daylight reduction (tinting), and should not be reflective (mirrored). □ Windows may have the following accessories: shutters sized to match the openings, canvas awnings appropriate to the architectural style, and planter boxes supported by visible and decorative brackets. 985
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.50 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Residential General Design Guidelines for Residential Uses Table 3-4 continued Doors and
Windows
(cont.)
□ Windows and doors may be trimmed in painted wood, brick, stone, or cast stone.
□ Windows may be single-hung, double-hung, hinged casement, or slider. Windows on main façades should be consistent with the selected architectural style.
□ Façades adjacent to or visible from the street should be fenestrated with windows and doors, identifying a principal entry to the building where practical.
Walls and
Fences
□ Building walls should be made of or finished in smooth or sand finish stucco, painted wood siding, brick, stone, or approved composite materials faithfully simulating these natural materials appropriate to the architectural style.
□ Perimeter garden walls should be made of concrete sand - colored slump masonry material.
□ Painted wood picket fences are allowed at the frontages of lots in the Low-Medium residential areas as long as they match the architectural style of the main structure. These fences should be a maximum of 36 inches in height and all fences shall be set back at least three feet from back of sidewalk with landscape between the sidewalk and fence. □ Rear yard walls visible from a street should be made of sand-colored slump block masonry. Interior yard walls and gates may be vinyl. □ Such walls should be no more than six feet in height, except where noise sources or adjacent grade differences require higher walls.
Mechanical
and Electrical
Equipment
□ All mechanical and electrical equipment—including but not limited to air-conditioning units and antennas—whether roof-mounted, ground-mounted, or otherwise, should be screened from street view with construction materials and a design that is consistent with the architectural style of the main structure. An exception shall be made for flat roof-mounted solar panels.
Colors □ Roofs: Fireproof Materials appropriate to the architecture style of the main structure in color and texture.
□ Walls: Natural materials or composite materials faithfully replicating the color and texture of the natural material, appropriate to the architectural style of the main structure.
□ Accents: Traditional and historically correct colors to complement the selected architectural style.
986
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.51 R-2 Density ResidentialR-2 Density Residential
R-2 Density Residential Guidelines
This residential density creates a moderate
intensity development and provides for
residential development of 7-12 units per
acre in the form of two-story buildings,
courtyard housing, condominiums,
townhouses or detached two-story single-
family houses. Buildings are to be designed
in a manner that orients the main façades to
the adjacent street and takes advantage of the
associated circulation system. On-site parking
shall be located primarily in street-facing or
clustered garages. On-street parking shall
be encouraged through site design. Minimal
front yard setbacks will be used along main
circulation arteries. Private outdoor space
in the form of balconies, patios, and porches
is required. Buildings should have definitive
entries and should function to reduce the
physical scale of the buildings through the
use of pedestrian scale design elements.
Development standards specified within the
Development Standards (Table 3-4) of this
Specific Plan shall be utilized. Additionally,
the following Development Guidelines shall
apply.
987
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.52 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Residential R-2 Density Development Guidelines Table 3-5 □ Two-story maximum building height of 30 feet, or up to 35 feet with an approved Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD).
□ A minimum of three variations of floor plans and three distinct exterior elevations shall be required.
□ Lot sizes shall be per the Teal Club Specific Plan (Table 3-4). □ Front yard setbacks to porches or building shall be a minimum of 10 feet from adjacent street right of way, with a 2-foot minimum front setback variation between adjacent residences.
□ Side and rear setbacks shall be a minimum of five feet, subject to site plan approval.
□ Parking garages shall not be oriented to the adjacent arterial or collector street and shall be accessed through a private drive aisle or parking court where feasible. Garages facing local streets shall be set back further than the porch or main structure.
□ The minimum parking requirements shall be per the City of Oxnard Zoning Ordinance. Of the spaces required, only guest parking spaces are allowed as “on-street” parking.
□ Craftsman, Traditional, Spanish Colonial Revival, and Monterey architectural styles and contemporary interpretations are appropriate for Low-Medium Density Development. Trash receptacles, electrical transformers, and other service elements shall be located in areas where parking is permitted and shall be screened from public view within the allowable standards of public utility agency requirements. □ All mechanical and electrical equipment—including but not limited to air-conditioning units, and antennas—whether roof-mounted, ground- mounted, or otherwise, shall be screened from public view, except as limited by other agency regulations. An exception shall be made for flat- mounted solar panels.
□ A minimum of two fully enclosed garage spaces are required for each detached unit.
988
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.53 R-3 and R-4 Residential Design Guidelines
This residential category provides for
residential development from 12 to 30 units
per acre in the form of two- and three-story
condominium buildings, courtyard housing,
or townhouses as well as three- and four-
story apartment buildings. Development
standards per the City of Oxnard Zoning
Ordinance for the R-3 and R-4 Zone
Classifications shall apply, except as specified
within the Development Standards (Table
3-4) of this Specific Plan. This density
provides a moderate transition from arterial
roadways and nearby commercial and
industrial development. Buildings are to
be designed in a manner that orients the
main façades to the adjacent street and
takes advantage of the associated circulation
system. Resident parking shall be located
primarily behind buildings or otherwise
screened from street view. Guest parking
may be accommodated in a combination
of designated on-site spaces and on-street
parking along the perimeter of a multi-
family residential parcel. Clustered design
is encouraged. Minimal front yard setbacks
will be used along main internal circulation
roadways. Private outdoor space in the form
of balconies, patios, or porches is required.
Buildings should have definitive entries and
should function to reduce the physical scale
of the buildings through the use of pedestrian
scale design elements.
Pedestrian or bike access will be an integral
part of the site design. The adjacent
pedestrian oriented circulation system can
be used as a secondary recreation area as
it relates to providing residents with an
enjoyable route to walk, jog, bike, etc. The
following Development Guidelines shall
apply.
R-3 and R-4 Density ResidentialR-3 and R-4 Density Residential 989
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.54 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Residential R-3 and R-4 Density Development Guidelines □ R-3 shall have a three-story maximum building height of 45 feet, and R-4 shall have a four-story maximum building height of 50 feet, with any exceptions requiring an approved Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD) subject to FAA restrictions and in accordance with zoning standards.
□ Lot sizes shall be per the Teal Club Specific Plan (Table 3-4) and comply with Subdivision Map Act standards for attached and multi-family dwelling units.
□ Front yard setbacks along circulation arteries shall be 15 feet as measured from the adjacent right of way. On corner lots the front setback applies to both façades facing an adjacent roadway. □ Side and rear setbacks shall be determined by the individual Planned Development Permit of each project and may be less than those established in the Oxnard Zoning Code. Minimum building separation shall be 5 feet per story of the taller of two adjacent buildings. (Example:
15 foot building separation between a three-story building and a two- story building.) This shall apply to buildings located on either the same parcel or adjoining separate parcels.
□ Parking areas shall not be located between the building and the adjacent street and shall be configured as “parking courts.” Any parking areas visible from a street frontage shall be screened from view by a low wall or by continuous landscaped shrubbery.
□ The minimum parking requirements shall be per the City of Oxnard Zoning Ordinance. Of the spaces required, only guest parking spaces are allowed as “on-street” parking. Tandem garage parking shall be allowed in R-3 for-sale residential projects and included in parking count totals.
Tandem spaces shall be assigned to the same unit.
□ Trash receptacles, electrical transformers, and other service elements shall be located in areas where parking is permitted and shall be screened from public view within the allowable standards of public utility agency requirements.
□ All mechanical and electrical equipment—including but not limited to air-conditioning units, and antennas—whether roof-mounted, ground- mounted, or otherwise, shall be screened from public view, except as limited by other agency regulations. An exception shall be made for flat roof-mounted solar panels.
□ Craftsman, Traditional, Monterey and Spanish Colonial Revival architectural styles and contemporary interpretations are appropriate for Medium and Medium High Density Development.
990
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.55
3.7.3 COMMERCIAL & MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT (C-2)
The commercial and mixed-use land use
components of the Specific Plan occur along
Ventura Road and Beverly Drive. Mixed-
use properties are a unique development
type in that they combine retail and office
commercial uses in a single site along with
residential uses in suitable locations. The
typical mixed-use design primarily has
retail or office uses located on the first-
floor street or public plaza frontage, while
residential uses occupy the upper floors.
Mixed-use development is consistent with
the Traditional Neighborhood Design form
proposed for this Specific Plan. Mixed-
use development is conducive to the small
town, pedestrian-oriented design elements
proposed in this plan.
The mixed-use area is envisioned as a
gathering place consisting of a combination
of single buildings and building groups with
landscape and hardscape details as a focal
point. The ambiance of the mixed-use zones
shall be open-air, inviting, and accessible to
the public.
The most desirable design will utilize
combinations of construction materials
and accent features such as brick, stucco,
wood, or stone. Heights will vary from
one to three-stories and façades will be
modulated to create the desired “village”
environment. Contemporary interpretation
of the Traditional or Spanish Colonial Revival
theme will build upon this ambiance and
allow architectural variety in the mixed-use
area.
The mixed use development will complement
the residential development in the rest of the
Specific Plan area. Visually and physically,
where two planning areas abut, there shall be
a smooth transition so as not to detract from
the overall design. This smooth transition is
accomplished through the continuation of the
adjacent mixed-use architectural styles, the
use of consistent landscape and hardscape
materials, the pedestrian-oriented street
design, and the street intersection corner
landscape open space design.
General Design Guidelines for Commercial
& Mixed-Use (C-2)
The following Design Guidelines for the
mixed-use development zones are consistent
with the City of Oxnard General Commercial
Zone (C-2) standards, except as specified
within this Specific Plan, and are intended to
highlight and expand on the uniqueness of
these highly visible public spaces.
Mixed-UseMixed-Use
991
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.56 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Commercial
& Mixed Use General Design Guidelines for Mixed Use & Commercial (C-2) Site
Planning
□ Buildings should be aligned along a plaza or sidewalk. Outdoor cafes and seating areas are encouraged.
□ Main entrances should have an architectural definition, such as an awning, recessed niche, three dimensional feature, or building projection. □ A combination of hardscape and landscape is required from the street or parking lots to the building wall on every setback area.
Architectural
Character
□ C-2 buildings shall have a two-story maximum building height of 35 feet, and Mixed Use shall have a three story maximum building height of 45 feet except with an approved Design Development Review Permit.
□ Buildings should maintain architectural articulation and visual quality on all sides.
□ Front façades for mixed-use buildings should be designed to create an individual identity to each vertical module or unit.
□ Storefront or display windows shall encompass a minimum of 40 percent and a maximum of 70 percent of the building facade.
□ All mechanical and electrical equipment including but not limited to air conditioning units, and antennas (whether roof-mounted or otherwise), should be screened from public view.
□ The mixed-use area shall allow a wider range of colors, materials, and forms to encourage a creative interpretation of the Traditional or Spanish Colonial Revival styles.
Parking and
Vehicular
Access
□ The Commercial frontage along Ventura Road shall allow for one driveway curb cut between Doris Avenue and Beverly Drive. A visible parking lot is allowed on the Ventura Road frontage.
□ Parking access, driveway design and parking areas shall provide clear path of pedestrian travel to store fronts.
□ Parking shall be provided for permitted uses in accordance with the provisions of the Zoning Code.
□ Nonresidential parking standards remain consistent with the City of Oxnard Zoning Ordinance; however, a shared parking agreement may be developed where practical and enforceable.
□ Service and loading facilities must be screened from view from public streets, open spaces, and other sensitive uses.
□ Trash receptacles, electrical transformers, and other service elements should be located in areas where parking is permitted and should be screened from public view by walls with matching architectural elements as those of the buildings they serve.
992
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.57
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
993
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.58 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
3.7.4 BUSINESS RESEARCH PARK
DEVELOPMENT (BRP)
Industrial uses within the Specific Plan are
intended to promote a balance of jobs and
housing within close proximity, reducing the
dependence on automobiles. The Specific Plan
industrial use areas are located immediately
north of and adjacent to existing industrial
zoning and provide a logical extension of this
land use type. The intent of the Specific Plan
industrial area is to provide a Business Research
Park (BRP) zoned location for new or expanded
manufacturing, research, professional, and high
technology uses consistent with the economic
development goals of the City of Oxnard. The
walkable community planning principle of
the Specific Plan places an emphasis on high
Industrial General Design Guidelines for BRP
Site Planning □ Buildings should be located near Teal Club Road with at least 40 percent of parking and all service and loading activities located away from street view. The remainder of parking may be on the building street frontage side.
□ A combination of hardscape and landscape is required from the street to the building wall on every setback area.
□ Main entrances should be prominent and easily identified and accessible from clearly defined guest parking areas.
□ All on-site lighting shall utilize light standards and devices that provide down-lighting that is shielded from abutting public streets, residential areas, or adjoining properties.
□ Lot sizes shall be a minimum of 20,000 square feet.
Architectural
Character
□ Two-story maximum building height of 35 feet.
□ Architectural styles shall include contemporary themes unique to the industrial area or interpretations of the Specific Plan styles. □ Buildings shall maintain architectural articulation on all sides. □ Buildings shall not exceed two stories in height and are subject to Oxnard Airport height and lighting imitations.
□ Building facades must have at least one break in wall plane of at least three feet in depth every 100 feet in length.
□ Flat roofs shall be allowed with adequate mechanical space parapet screening.
quality of life for the daytime workforce with
direct access to trails, greenbelts, and parks.
Commercial services including restaurants
and shopping are planned within a ten minute
walking distance of the majority of industrial
parcels.
The following Development Guidelines are
consistent with the Business Research Park
(BRP) Zone, except as specified within this
Specific Plan and are consistent with the
recommended architectural styles.
General Design Guidelines for BRP Uses
The following guidelines apply to all industrial
development within the Teal Club Specific
Plan area.
994
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chapt er 3 - Community Development p.59 Industrial General Design Guidelines for BRP
Architectural
Character
(cont.)
□ All mechanical and electrical equipment including but not limited to air conditioning units and antennas (whether roof-mounted, ground-mounted or otherwise) should be screened from public view. An exception is made for solar panels which are integrated into the design of a building. □ Roofs shall include solar panels.
□ Tinted or reflective glass may be allowed, appropriate to the architectural style. □ The industrial use area shall allow a range of colors, materials, and forms to encourage architectural diversity within the limits of the style selected for an individual building or buildings. The decision-makers shall have authority on appropriateness of colors through the discretionary permit process.
Walls and
Fences
□ Walls and fences are to be made of sand-colored slump masonry material. □ Walls shall be utilized to screen all permitted outdoor activities completely from offsite public view.
□ The required height for any BRP zone wall or fence is eight feet, except with a discretionary permit which may allow up to ten feet in height. □ All BRP public-facing wall surfaces shall be planted with approved fast-growing vines and trellis material to prevent graffiti.
□ Outdoor storage shall be subject to a Special Use Permit and shall not exceed the height of the perimeter screen wall.
Parking and
Vehicular
Access
(cont.)
□ No loading areas may be located where they can be viewed directly from any adjacent or nearby residential areas. Loading areas are to be screened from view by walls or fences.
□ A 20-foot wide landscape buffer and wall shall be incorporated into the site design separating the residential street from the BRP area (as shown in Fig 3-4).
□ Trash receptacles, electrical transformers, and other service elements should be located in areas where parking is permitted and should be screened from public view by walls matching architectural elements of the buildings they serve. □ Trash enclosures shall include hose bibs and be maintained in a clean and odor-free condition.
□ Industrial and office parking standards remain consistent with the City of Oxnard Zoning Ordinance; however, a shared parking agreement may be developed where appropriate, practical, and enforceable. □ Guest parking shall be provided at clearly identifiable locations near the entry to a building.
□ No on-street loading is allowed in the industrial areas of the Specific Plan. 995
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.60 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
3.7.5 PUBLIC PARKS & HOA RECREATION
AREAS
The Specific Plan provides for a range of
active and passive park spaces with varied
uses and amenities. The combination of
private homeowners’ association facilities
and publicly owned and maintained parks are
intended to meet the needs of the plan area
residents and business employees as well as
provide public benefit to the entire Oxnard
community.
The intent of the park and open space plan
is to ensure that all residents and employees
are within a ten-minute walk of usable
recreational amenities, encouraging an active
healthy lifestyle. There are two public parks
in the plan area: the Phase 1 and 2 portions of
the ten-acre centrally-located Neighborhood
Park and the 7.3 acre Phase 2 southwest area
park. The central east-west greenbelt creates
a visible connection for public gathering,
organized recreation, walking, and biking.
Both public parks will be owned and
maintained by the City of Oxnard and serve a
portion of the recreational needs of the plan
area and the existing nearby neighborhoods.
Maintenance funding shall be provided by a
Maintenance Community Facilities District
(CFD) or other city-approved funding
mechanism. Turf play areas, playground
equipment, bathrooms, and picnic tables will
be incorporated into the parks, subject to
final design approval by the City of Oxnard.
HOA Private Recreation Areas
HOA-maintained private recreation areas
constructed by developers and maintained
by Property Owners’ or Homeowners’
Associations are allowed. These private
spaces provide for a portion of recreational
Neighborhood ParkNeighborhood Park
needs and are available for use only by the
residents and guests of the plan area or a sub-
area of the Specific Plan.
All park and private recreation landscaping
will be irrigated with City of Oxnard water
and comply with the landscape guidelines of
the Specific Plan. The park plans shall also
comply with the Recreation Element of the
General Plan. The following guidelines shall
be considered when planning and designing
the Public Parks and HOA-owned facilities
within the Teal Club Specific Plan area.
996
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.61 Parks General Design Guidelines for Parks
Neighborhood
Parks
□ Park shall be operated and maintained by City of Oxnard Recreation and Community Services Department. All costs of maintenance of the parks shall be borne by the Specific Plan developments under a financing mechanism as defined within the Phase 1 and Phase 2 Development Agreements.
□ No more than 50 percent of the total park area shall be reserved for turf and shall also provide areas for passive recreational space. □ A portion of the park area shall be designed as active recreational space with related equipment that shall include play structures and/or a tot play area.
□ Organized sports fields may be considered for the turf areas. Field lighting shall be allowed subject to Oxnard Airport approval. Lighting for pedestrian and parking areas shall be designed to the highest available light cut-off standards due to the proximity to the Oxnard Airport and nearby residences. Pedestrian and parking lot pole lighting shall not exceed 20 feet in height.
□ Each park shall include at least six picnic tables and appropriate apparatus; group picnic facilities may be allowed at this location and could include one shelter structure.
□ Park benches, drinking fountains and trash receptacles will be included at appropriate locations.
□ Restroom facilities shall be provided, subject to City approval. □ The park architectural character will be consistent with the theme of the allowed Specific Plan architectural styles.
□ Landscape area will include clusters of trees dispersed throughout the park area.
□ Park landscape will be designed to promote off-site visibility and public safety for policing and neighborhood awareness throughout the park. □ The roadway edges of the park should incorporate the adjacent streetscape character.
□ No more than 15 percent of the park will be utilized for parking lots. On- street perimeter parking is allowed. Overnight parking is prohibited. □ Field lighting shall be designed to the highest available light cut- off standards to shield future adjacent homes from light and glare.
Field lighting and hours of operation shall be managed by the City Recreational Services Department.
□ All lighting shall comply with the City of Oxnard lighting requirements. 997
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.62 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Parks General Design Guidelines for Parks and Recreation Areas HOA Facilities □ Facilities shall be operated, funded and maintained by a private Property Owners’ Association, or as required by an applicable Development Agreement.
□ A maximum of 25 percent of the total overall HOA recreation and greenbelt area shall be reserved for turf or other appropriate surface and shall provide passive recreational space.
□ Park benches and trash receptacles will be included at appropriate locations.
□ HOA maintained areas may contain a fenced and gated pool and spa for the exclusive use of the Property Owners’ Association members per the Association rules and regulations.
□ Restroom facilities shall meet or exceed the requirements of applicable Building Codes.
□ Community use buildings may be constructed for the exclusive use of the Property Owners’ Association members per the Association rules and regulations.
□ Active recreational features such as basketball half-courts may be included.
□ Passive landscape gardens and community produce gardens are encouraged within the community.
□ Landscape area will include clusters of shade trees dispersed throughout the recreation areas.
□ Landscape will be designed to promote off-site visibility and public safety for policing and neighborhood awareness throughout the community.
998
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.63
3.7.6 OPEN SPACE
The open space elements of the plan are
intended to enhance the quality of life for
residents and employees of the area and
provide vital environmental benefits. Open
space will be privately-owned and maintained
by a Property Owners Association, or as
required by an applicable Development
Agreement. Greenbelts, parkways, and
the Mixed-Use Central Plaza shall be
publicly accessible; pool areas and internal
recreational amenities within the Planning
Areas shall be for the private use of Specific
Plan residents within the individual Planning
Areas. All required irrigation shall be with
City of Oxnard water and comply with the
landscape guidelines of the Specific Plan.
Greenbelts
Greenbelts link the community together
and provide a further separation between
commercial and residential uses. Greenbelts
shall be primarily turf and locally-adapted
ground cover, shrubs, and trees.
Detention Basins & Water Quality Features
Detention basins provide both flood control
and water quality functions, resulting in
improved outflows. Landscaping is intended
to be native or adapted species and should
need little or no irrigation after a grow-in
period.
General Design Guidelines for Open Space
The following guidelines shall be considered
when planning and designing the open space
within the Teal Club Specific Plan area.
GreenbeltGreenbelt
999
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.64 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Open Space General Design Guidelines for Open Space
Greenbelts □ Shall be owned and maintained by a private Property Owners Association, or as required by an applicable Development Agreement. □ Design shall require approval of the City of Oxnard.
□ Introduced vegetation shall be consistent with the landscape standards of the Specific Plan.
□ Picnic tables and apparatus are not intended to be in the greenbelt and trail areas.
□ Park benches and trash receptacles will be included at appropriate locations.
□ Lighting may be allowed along the greenbelt with the consent of the City of Oxnard. Lighting shall not spill over onto adjacent residential lots.
Detention
Basins
□ Shall be operated and maintained by a Property Owners’ Association or other private entity for the purpose of flood control and water quality assurance.
□ Design shall require approval of the City of Oxnard.
□ Introduced vegetation shall be consistent with the landscape standards of the Specific Plan and provide suitable vegetation consistent with the engineering design requirements of the basin.
□ No buildings shall be allowed in the detention basins. □ All detention basins in excess of 18” water storage depth shall be fenced and gated to restrict public access.
□ Basins shall be maintained to the standards of the water quality permit issued by the City of Oxnard or any other agency with jurisdiction over their function.
□ Irrigation may be temporary or permanent, subject to the final design approval of the City of Oxnard.
3.7.7 LANDSCAPE
The Teal Club Specific Plan concept seeks
to unify the diverse planning elements
of both the site and its surroundings,
which tie the entire project together. The
landscape concept also aims to provide a
distinct visual impression and community
identity while providing the highest level
of aesthetic standards that will assure
an attractive environment and enhance
the quality of life among its residents. The
landscape elements will recall the Coastal
California theme through the use of native
and naturalized plant materials. This Coastal
California sense will carry through from the
drought-tolerant and indigenous plants to
the hardscape features including decorative
walls, signs, and monuments.
1000
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.65 in the area. Plant selection factors include
compatibility with local soils, the micro-
and macro climates throughout the site,
the plant’s ability to merge into the existing
natural environments, and drought tolerance.
See Appendix 1, Landscape Palette, for the
plant selections and locations. Additional
plant materials may be administratively
approved by the Community Development
Director or their designee.
General Landscape Guidelines
In addition to City of Oxnard’s Landscape
Standards and the landscape provisions of
this document, the following guidelines shall
apply to all land uses within the Specific Plan
area.
Landscape irrigation for the community will
be designed to provide the most efficient
means to distribute irrigation water and
provide the community with the latest
technology for community-wide water
conservation.
A detailed planting palette has been carefully
selected for the project. The primary goal is
to incorporate species that are already well
established, including a variety of traditional
trees, shrubs, and grasses historically found
Landscape General Landscape Guidelines for Specific Plan Area Uses General
Landscape
□ All areas not devoted to paving or building shall be landscaped and permanently maintained.
□ Planting area dimensions shall be consistent with plant material requirements and the purpose of the planting, such as aesthetics, scree`ning, environmental mitigations, air quality, wind, noise, etc. □ Street trees shall be planted at minimum of 40-foot intervals. □ Permanent automatic irrigation facilities with moisture sensors shall be provided in all landscaped areas.
□ Landscape areas shall be maintained by Property Owners’ or Homeowners’ Associations and may be funded by Maintenance and Community Facilities District (CFD).
□ Prior to the issuance of building permits for each individual segment of the plan area, landscape and irrigation plans in conformance with these regulations shall be submitted to the City of Oxnard.
□ To minimize exterior water use, the following measures shall be incorporated into project design within the project area, where feasible:
use of drought tolerant plants; extensive use of mulch in landscaped areas; installation of low precipitation rate irrigation systems where appropriate.
1001
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.66 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Landscaping Guidelines for Residential
Yards
The types of landscape, hardscape, and low
yard walls or fences that are built adjacent
to the streets will define the character
of the neighborhood. This Specific Plan
allows for front yard landscape treatments
that emphasize the front lawn due to the
availability of “Advanced Purified” water to
the Specific Plan area. All publicly visible
yards shall obtain landscape plan approval
prior to construction per the requirements of
Community CC&R’s.
In addition to City of Oxnard landscape
standards and the landscape provisions of
this document, the following shall apply to
all residential yards within the Specific Plan
area.
Landscape General Landscape Guidelines for Specific Plan Area Uses General
Landscape
(cont.)
□ All street trees shall be planted and staked per City of Oxnard landscape standards and details. All trees planted in turf areas shall receive turf boots to prevent damage from mowers and edgers, etc. Root barriers shall be required where trees are planted within five feet of any walls, curbs, walks, buildings, or other hardscape.
□ All plant materials shall be planted in accordance with City of Oxnard standards and minimum sizing requirements.
□ All landscaping and irrigation shall comply with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance No. 2822 and the associated Landscape Water Conservation Standards. Where conflicts may exist between the Specific Plan language and the Ordinance No. 2822 language, the more restrictive water use language shall prevail.
□ Where the specific plan design guidelines are silent on landscape issues, the City of Oxnard Landscape Standards shall prevail.
1002
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chapt er 3 - Community Development p.67 Landscape Landscape Guidelines for Residential Yards
Front Yard
General
□ Forty percent of the yard may be hardscape, providing access to the garage, guest parking, front walks, and courtyards. Hardscape may include brick, stone, interlocking concrete pavers, textured concrete, and/or impressed patterned concrete. The balance of the yard shall be landscaped. Only driveways may be used for driving and parking of automobiles.
□ Landscaping may include turf, low shrubs or groundcover, and yard trees, as outlined in the Plant Palette Appendix to the Specific Plan.
Front Yard
Detached
& Attached
Cluster Home
Areas (R-2)
□ Front yards shall be a minimum of 10 feet in depth from the back of the sidewalk to a façade, including patios and porches. A setback minimum of 18 feet shall be required from the back of public sidewalk to a garage door.
□ No more than 25% of the front yard may consist of turf grass.. □ At façades, low shrubs and/or groundcover shall be planted against the façade.
□ At porches, low shrubs or wall vines shall be allowed. □ No pilasters, statuary, or decorative columns shall be allowed in front yards. Fountains up to 36" in height are allowed in front yards.
Front Yard
R-3 and R-4
Areas
□ Multi-family front yards shall be a minimum of 15 feet in depth from the back of the public sidewalk to a facade, including patios and porches. □ Turf, ground cover, and low shrubs may be planted in the area between the buildings and the sidewalk.
□ Shrubs may be massed or configured as maintained hedges. □ Tree sizes and types shall be planted as buffers at the edge of the private space in proportion to the height and mass of the building façade.
Other Yards □ Side yards shall be planted to ensure privacy and create buffers as identified above. Where practical, public street-adjacent side yards shall be planted and maintained by a Property Owners Association. □ Rear yards and property lines shall be landscaped in order to preserve the quality of the pedestrian oriented circulation system and prevent erosion.
1003
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.68 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Landscape Guidelines for Roads and
Streets
The principal plantings on all streets are tree
rows mixed with landscape groundcover and
shrubs that define the pedestrian oriented
circulation system. Perimeter and interior
roads connect the Teal Club Specific Plan area
to the adjacent land uses. The Plant Palette
Appendix provides the Master Street Tree
Plan.
In addition to City of Oxnard landscape
standards and the landscape provisions of
this document, the following shall apply to
all roads and streets within the Specific Plan
area.
Landscape Landscape Guidelines for Roads and Streets
General □ All streetscapes shall be planted with 24-inch box-sized trees. □ Street trees shall be selected for their ability to form canopies and require minimal maintenance; this includes trees with sidewalk-friendly root systems.
□ Root collars will be utilized in all areas where there are sidewalks and/or plazas.
□ Consistency in tree species and spacing shall be used to establish a strong street identity.
Arterial
Roads
□ Trees on arterial roads shall be planted along the landscape buffer area adjacent to all public sidewalks with lawn or groundcover. □ Trees will be spaced equally at approximately 40 feet on center.
Streets
(Collector and
Local)
□ Collector and Local streets shall have trees planted along the landscape area adjacent to all public sidewalks with lawn as groundcover. □ Trees will be spaced equally at approximately 40 feet on center. □ In order to provide maximum identity, the width of landscape buffers, street medians, and sidewalks shall correspond to the type of the street. 1004
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.69 Hardscape
and Street
Furniture
General Design Guidelines for Hardscape and Street Furniture General □ Hardscape shall be used to enhance the pedestrian experience. □ Enhanced paving shall be considered in high visibility areas, neighborhood entries, and key intersections throughout the Specific Plan area.
□ Hardscape materials may include, but are not limited to, the following:
integral color concrete with acid wash finish and a pattern of frequent deep score joints; seeded exposed aggregate concrete; impressed (stamped) concrete with modular tile or cobblestone pattern; pre-cast interlocking concrete pavers.
□ Street furniture shall be provided at appropriate intersections and gathering places; materials and colors are to be consistent throughout the plan area.
Landscape Guidelines for Parking Lots
In addition to City of Oxnard landscape
standards and the landscape provisions of
this document, the following shall apply to all
parking lots within the Specific Plan area.
3.7.8 HARDSCAPE & STREET FURNITURE
The design of hardscape and street furniture
shall create a strong community framework
that relates to the established architectural
style and character. Natural materials and
quality construction are strongly encouraged.
The hardscape and street furniture element
may include enhanced paving (sidewalks and
paving), walls and fences, arbors and shade
Landscape Landscape Guidelines for Parking Lots
Parking Lots □ Landscaping of parking lots shall consist of 24-inch box trees and shall be provided at the rate of one tree per eight parking spaces. □ The required trees shall be planted on landscaped islands located within the parking area and along the perimeter of the parking area. structures, water features, gates, seating
elements, lighting, signage, finishes, grade
elevations, and drain structures.
General Design Guidelines for Hardscape
and Street Furniture
The following are guidelines for hardscape
and street furniture design within the Specific
Plan area.
1005
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.70 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Curbs and
Sidewalks General Design Guidelines for Curbs and Sidewalks Curbs □ Curbs shall be vertical concrete curb and shall be natural gray concrete.
Sidewalks □ Sidewalks will be natural gray medium acid wash finish concrete with a tooled grid to reflect the character of older early California neighborhoods (2 ft. x 2 ft. grid for 4 ft. walks), (2.5 ft. x 2.5 ft. grid for 5 ft. walks), and (3 ft. x 3 ft. grid for 6 ft. walks).
□ Other walkways in the community may include, but are not limited to, the following: natural gray acid wash concrete; integral color concrete with acid wash finish; seeded/exposed aggregate concrete; pre-cast interlocking concrete pavers.
Lighting General Design Guidelines for Lighting
Street Lights □ Street lights shall be decorative pole lights with traditional globe or pendant fixtures to match the architectural character of the Traditional Neighborhood community theme.
□ “Cobra” lights will not be permitted within the neighborhoods. □ Poles may be concrete or aluminum; color and finish are to be reviewed by the Development Services Director.
□ Lighting shall not spill over from the subject parcel to any other lot or create a hazard for pedestrians or automobile drivers.
Decorative
Lights
□ Decorative up-lights, bollards, and landscape accent fixtures are allowed in the community at entries to individual neighborhoods and the commercial, mixed-use, and industrial areas. These lights shall match the architectural character of the Traditional Neighborhood community theme.
□ Lighting shall not spill over from the subject parcel to any other lot or create a hazard for pedestrians or automobile drivers.
3.7.9 CURBS & SIDEWALKS
The following are guidelines for curbs and
sidewalks within the Specific Plan area.
3.7.10 LIGHTING
The following are guidelines for street and
decorative lighting within the Specific Plan
area.
1006
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.71 Walls and
Fencing General Design Guidelines for Walls and Fencing Walls and
Fencing
□ The community shall be viewed as open, connective, and inviting. □ All fencing and wall heights will be measured vertically from the average finished grade at the base of the fence or wall.
□ Side and rear yard walls will have a maximum height of six feet, except at the BRP buffer area where an eight foot wall is required. □ Landscaping with shrubs and vines shall be used to reduce the visible height of walls when necessary.
□ Side yards requiring a retaining wall will provide a minimum horizontal separation of two feet between the side yard wall and the retaining wall to allow for planting.
□ Side yard gates may be vinyl, wood or tubular steel. Perimeter fencing and walls shall be earth-tone slump stone blocks. Side yard fencing may be vinyl or earth-tone slump stone block. Finish colors must be approved by the City and be consistent with the architectural style. □ Fencing and walls must meet pool safety code requirements for height, picket spacing, and access.
□ All retaining walls must be properly waterproofed and drained. □ Walls may not occur directly adjacent to any walkway; a minimum three-foot landscape area is required.
3.7.12 MAILBOXES
The following are guidelines for mailboxes
within the Specific Plan area.
All walls and fences shall comply with the
Oxnard Municipal Code. In the event of a
conflict between the Municipal Code and
this Specific Plan, the more restrictive
requirement shall apply.
3.7.11 WALLS & FENCES
In keeping with the community theme of
inclusiveness and integration, rather than
exclusivity and segregation, the following are
guidelines for walls and fences within the
Specific Plan area.
General Design Guidelines for Mailboxes
Mailboxes □ Mailboxes in the residential neighborhoods will be grouped in kiosks in accordance with the postmaster specifications.
□ Mailbox kiosks shall be located at the entries to streets where possible. 1007
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.72 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
Signage General Design Guidelines for Non-Residential Signage Courtyard
Wall Signs
□ Lettering applied to courtyard walls (walls parallel to the frontage line and matching the building walls to identify facilities, institutions, and addresses) shall be individually mounted metal letters, not to exceed 16 inches in height, either front lit or halo lit.
□ Courtyard walls intended to receive signage may encroach to within five feet of the frontage line.
Freestanding
Monument
Signs
□ Lettering applied to freestanding walls that are not courtyard walls (i.e. walls not parallel to the frontage line or matching the building walls to identify facilities, businesses, tenants, and addresses) shall be individually mounted metal letters, not to exceed 16 inches in height either front lit or halo lit except with Development Services Department approval.
□ Monument signs shall meet the same setback requirements as required for courtyard wall signs and shall have distinct base and cap elements. □ Monument signs shall be set back at least five feet from the frontage line and shall not exceed five feet in height, except with Development Services Department approval.
□ Materials for monument Signs may include, but are not limited to, the following: slump block with painted sack finish; plaster and stucco; brick; stone; concrete.
numerals attached to walls, in accordance
with the sign regulations of the City of
Oxnard Zoning Code, Fire, and Police
requirements.
Non-Residential Signage
The City of Oxnard Sign Ordinance shall
apply to the Teal Club Specific Plan. The
following additional requirements also apply
to the Mixed Use, C-2 and BRP zones.
3.7.13 SIGNAGE
While the primary purpose of signs is to guide
and inform, the design and placement can
be multifunctional. Signage for the Teal Club
Specific Plan is intended to clearly identify
entry to the community and reinforce the
natural open space character of the plan area.
The location and design of all entry signs will
be directed at establishing gateways to the
plan area.
Residential Signage
Permanent signs for residential uses include
neighborhood identification signs placed in
intersection parkways and street address
1008
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.73 Signage General Design Guidelines for Non-Residential Signage Building Wall
Signs
□ Lettering applied to a facade to identify the building or an institution within the building. See City of Oxnard Sign Ordinance.
Projecting
Signs
□ Sign panels perpendicular to and projecting from a facade to identify a tenant or use shall be made of metal or wood with lettering raised, incised, or painted.
Lighting,
Materials,
etc.
□ All signs, if lit, shall be front lit or halo lit, not internally illuminated except with Community Development Department approval; no canister type signs are permitted.
□ All signs shall be made of materials compatible with exterior building colors, materials, and finishes, and be of a high quality of fabrication. □ No signs will be permitted that do not directly relate to the name or primary service of function of the building user or institution. □ Signs are to be free of all labels and fabricator’s advertising, except for those required by code.
□ All electrical service to sign lights shall be fully concealed; no sign shall have exposed wiring, raceways, ballasts, conduit, or transformers. □ No sign shall have visible moving parts or simulate movement by means of fluttering, rotating, or reflecting devices.
□ No sign shall have flashing, blinking, or moving lights, or any other moving lights, or other illuminating device that has changing light intensity, brightness, or color, except for parts designated to give public service information such as time, date, temperature, or similar information.
□ Freestanding monument signs shall be integrated with landscaping and courtyard walls to minimize visual mass.
□ Metal signs may be made of aluminum, brass, bronze, copper, or stainless steel.
□ No cabinet signs allowed.
1009
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.74 Community Development
Teal Club Specific Plan
3.8 URBAN VILLAGE
The Teal Club Specific Plan is an Urban
Village and fronts on a proposed transit
stop at Ventura Road and Beverly Drive. It
is connected to the neighborhood through a
series of green belts, sidewalks and dedicated
bikeways.
3.8.1 MIXED USES
An appropriate mix of uses is necessary
to create a vibrant Urban Village.
Neighborhood-oriented retail and
commercial uses shall be located on the
ground floor of Urban Village buildings
fronting on the intersection of Ventura
Road and Beverly Drive at the project entry.
Residential uses shall be located on the
floor(s) above the ground-level commercial.
3.8.2 TRANSIT ORIENTED
A new transit stop will be located on
Ventura Road within the Urban Village.
The transit stop will be improved with
amenities including a shelter, benches and
bike racks. This transit stop will connect the
neighborhood to nearby job centers such
as Navy Base Ventura County, the port and
office and manufacturing centers to the south
and east. The Oxnard Transportation Center
provides greater regional links. It is intended
that two or more bus routes serving the Teal
Club Specific Plan will include direct stops
at the Oxnard Transportation Center. This
direct connection will enable public transit
access to Metrolink, Amtrak, and VCTC bus
service.
3.8.3 PUBLIC SPACE
The focal point for the Urban Village will
be a public plaza. The plaza will front on
the extension of Beverly Drive and will be
integrated into the Urban Village mixed-use
area. The plaza area shall have a minimum
dimension of 100’ in any direction and
include both fixed perimeter seating and a
central multi-function area for neighborhood
arts and cultural use. The public plaza will
include an identity feature that will further
define the space. A conceptual illustration for
the plaza and typical proposed features are
provided in Figure 3-3.
1010
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 3 - Community Development p.75
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
1011
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.76 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
4INFRASTRUCTURE &
COMMUNITY SERVICES
4.1 INFRASTRUCTURE OVERVIEW
The Teal Club Specific Plan is proposed
to be developed in two phases. Phasing is
discussed in more detail in Chapter 8 and
Figure 8-1 illustrates the Proposed Phase
1 Improvement Plan. Phase 1 consists of
Planning Areas PA1 through PA8 as well
as the perimeter and interior roadways,
infrastructure and utilities necessary to
serve PA1 through PA8. Additional off-site
roadways and infrastructure necessary for
development of Phase 1 are discussed and
illustrated within the following sections of
Chapter 4.
Figure 8-2 illustrates the Proposed Build-
out (Phase 2) Improvement Plan. Phase
2 of the Specific Plan consists of Planning
Areas PA9 through PA14 and includes the
remainder of the roadway and infrastructure
improvements discussed and illustrated
within Chapter 4. The portions of Patterson
Road and Doris Avenue that are not a
part of the Teal Club Specific Plan provide
the frontage and access to the property
owned by the Oxnard School District at the
southeast corner of Patterson Road and Doris
Avenue. Those roadway and infrastructure
improvements are proposed to be built by
the Oxnard School District as a part of their
future campus development, as shown on
their proposed campus site plans.
The extent of off-site improvements required
shall ultimately be consistent with the
mitigations as defined and required by
the Teal Club Specific Plan certified Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR).
4.2 CIRCULATION PLAN
The Vehicle Circulation Plan locates the
existing and proposed road network and
is illustrated in Figure 4-1. In addition to
providing sufficient access to the proposed
land uses, the street network is designed
to link the project to adjacent existing
communities. Final engineered road
alignments may vary and are subject to
review and approval by the City of Oxnard
based on policies contained in this document.
Any major roadway changes may require an
amendment to this Specific Plan as defined
in Section 8.5. The roadway categories
are summarized in accordance with the
Circulation Element of the City’s General
Plan.
4.2.1 ON-SITE STREETS
Within the Specific Plan area there are
two types of street categories: Collector
Streets (both Commercial/Industrial and
Residential), and Local Streets.
1012
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.77 Collector Streets
Collector Streets within the Specific Plan
area will provide two 12-foot travel lanes in
a 80-foot right-of-way and a curb-to-curb
pavement width of 40 to 54 feet; 13-foot
minimum landscaped parkway with a 5-foot
sidewalk are typically provided. Figures 4-2
and 4-3, illustrate this street section.
Local Streets
Local streets are public streets located within
the Specific Plan area. Local Public Streets
provide access to residential and recreational
land uses. They typically have a right-of-way
width of 66 feet and a curb-to-curb pavement
width of 40 feet with 13-foot parkway
containing an 8-foot landscape area and a
5-foot sidewalk. Figure 4-4 illustrates these
street sections. Local Private Streets within
individual planning areas are allowed with
street widths of 36 feet or less curb-to-curb,
subject to City of Oxnard approval.
Local Streets are located and detailed with
the following intentions:
□ Provide quiet, safe, and attractive
frontages for residential lots;
□ Provide safe and convenient routes for
pedestrians from homes to recreational
areas; and
□ Accommodate low volume vehicular
traffic and bicycles at slow speeds.
The precise location shall be determined
through the approval of subdivision maps.
The precise width of private streets shall
be determined through the approval of
subdivision maps and related discretionary
permits for these project areas.
Transit Hub
A key component of the community
circulation plan is a transit hub at the
southwest corner of the intersection
of Ventura Road and Beverly Drive.
This intersection will be traffic signal-
controlled to serve as a main artery into
the project and will connect the existing
neighborhoods to the east to the new
community park and project amenities.
The transit hub will be adjacent to the
Mixed-Use entry buildings and include
a full bus turn-out and bus shelter for
the south-bound Gold Coast Transit
Ventura Road route as well as a public
plaza with bike racks and seating areas
to encourage local resident daily use
of the public transportation system. A
separate bus shelter will be provided on
the east side of Ventura Road to serve
the north-bound Gold Coast Transit
Ventura Road route.
4.2.2 OFF-SITE STREETS
The project area is bounded by an
existing network of streets that will be
improved consistent with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan. Two
types of streets, Primary Arterial and
Secondary Arterial, are adjacent to the
Specific Plan area:
Primary Arterial Street
Ventura Road is currently a Four-Lane
Primary Arterial Road adjacent to the
project area (Figure 4-5). It consists of
four 11-foot travel lanes (two in each
direction), with a right-of-way width of
approximately 177 feet and a curb-to-
1013
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.78 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 4-1 Vehicle Circulation Plan
PA 5
PA 1
PA 1
PA 10
PA 9
PA 8
PA 12
PA 11 PA 11
PA 13PA 13 PA 14
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
Primary Arterial
Secondary Arterial
Residential Collector
Roundabout
Choker
Teal Club Rd.
Ventura Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Doris Ave
Beverly Drive
Local Streets
Transit Hub
Coronado Pl.
0’ 500’
1014
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.79 Figure 4-2 Residential Collector
Not to Scale
`
Doris Ave.
Ventura Rd.
Teal Club Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Phase 2 Phase 1
Coronado Pl.
Phase 1Phase 1 Phase 1
12’ 7’
R/W
80’
8’ 5’
R/W
5’ 8’8’8’ 7’ 12’
Side
walkLand
scape
Bike ParkingTravel
LaneSide
walk
Land
scape
Parking Bike Travel
Lane
Not a Part
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer. 1015
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.80 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 4-3 Residential Collector - Beverly Drive
Not to Scale
`
Doris Ave.
Ventura Rd.
Teal Club Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Coronado Pl.
80’
Travel
Lane
R/WR/W
5’7’ 12’ 8’12’12’ 8’8’ 8’
Multi-Purpose
Trail
Land
scape
Parking Land
scape
Land
scape
ParkingTravel
Lane
Side
walk
Not a Part
Phase 2 Phase 1
Phase 1 Phase 1
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer. 1016
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.81 `
`
Doris Ave.
Ventura Rd.
Teal Club Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Coronado Pl.
R/W
Figure 4-4 Local Streets
Not to Scale
R/W
Side
walk
Side
walkLand
scape
Land
scapeParking ParkingTravel
Lane
Travel
Lane
12’12’
40’
66’
8’8’ 8’ 8’ 5’5’
Not a Part
Phase 2 Phase 1
Phase 1 Phase 1
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer.
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer. 1017
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.82 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
curb pavement width of 102 feet including
the existing frontage road, with controlled
access and restricted parking. Ventura Road
is proposed to be widened to six lanes plus
an 8-foot Class II bike lane in each direction
south of Doris Avenue, in keeping with the
existing General Plan designation. A 14-foot
wide landscaped center median shall be
provided, and the existing parkway on the
easterly side of Ventura Road shall remain
as currently improved. The westerly parkway
shall be 30 feet wide and consist of a 6-foot
wide sidewalk and landscape areas.
Dedicated right and left turn lanes will be
provided where needed. Figure 4-5 illustrates
the section view of Ventura Road between
Doris Avenue and Teal Club Road. The
Commercial frontage along Ventura Road
shall allow for one driveway curb cut between
Doris Avenue and Beverly Drive to facilitate
access to the Commercial site.
Prior to recordation of the first Tract Map
within the plan area the Teal Club Specific
Plan developer shall design the following
roadway alignment details to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer:
□ Ventura Road & Doris Avenue
intersection: design transitions to all
legs of the intersection for public safety,
pedestrian and bike lane connection, and
free flow of traffic consistent with the
General Plan Circulation Element.
□ Ventura Road & Beverly Drive
intersection: design transitions to all
legs of the intersection for public safety,
pedestrian and bike lane connection, and
free flow of traffic. A traffic signal with
left-turn pockets and median shall be
designed for Ventura Road at the Beverly
Drive intersection. Bus turn-outs with
covered bench shelters and bike storage
shall be incorporated in the public right-
of-way improvements.
□ Ventura Road & Teal Club Road/West
Second Street intersection: design
transitions to all legs of the intersection
for public safety, pedestrian and bike
lane connection, and free flow of
traffic. Roadway design shall include
consideration of West Second Street
median realignment and minimizing
impacts to existing properties on the
south side of Teal Club Road west of
Ventura Road.
Secondary Arterial Streets
Proposed Secondary Arterial streets adjacent
to the Specific Plan area include Doris
Avenue, Patterson Road and Teal Club Road.
In Phase 1 Doris Avenue is proposed to be
widened between Ventura Road and Street
“A” to two 16-foot travel lanes with a right-
of way width of 98 feet, not including the
existing 20’ of landscape on the north side of
Doris Avenue. The street section will include
8-foot Class II bike lanes, a 12-foot Class I
bike path, and a 16-foot wide center median
as shown in Figure 4-6.
Phase 1 improvements to Patterson Road
shall consist of the ultimate roadway and
median segments but not the east side multi-
purpose trail and 30-foot parkway or the west
side 10-foot parkway. Class II bike lanes shall
be provided in place of the ultimate parking
areas within the Phase 1 pavement section as
shown in Figure 4-7.
1018
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.83 Figure 4-5 Primary Arterial - Ventura Road
Not to Scale
`
R/W
11’ S’walk
R/W
Ventura Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Teal Club Rd.
Doris Ave.
8’12’
30’
12’
6’ 8’
11’ 11’ 11’ 8’
42’ 42’
14’
30.5’+/-
4.5’+/-14’+/-
12’
Median
Exist.
Pkwy
Frontage Road
Typical Section
Class II
Bike
Lane
Class II
Bike
Lane
177’
Phase 2
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer.
Multi-
Purpose
TrailLandscape
Land
scape
5’13’
Not a Part
Phase 1
Phase 1 Phase 1
1019
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.84 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
of the road.
Phase 1 widening of Teal Club Road west of
Coronado Place to Patterson Road will consist
of improvements within the existing 40-
foot right-of-way with two travel lanes and
8-foot paved shoulder areas on each side as
shown in Figure 4-9. Phase 1 widening from
Patterson Road west to Victoria Avenue will
also consist of the two travel lanes and 8-foot
paved shoulder areas as shown in Figure 4-9.
Phase 2 widening of Teal Club Road from
Coronado Place to Patterson Road will
consist of the full build-out of Teal Club Road
as shown in Figure 4-10 with four 12-foot
travel lanes, 8-foot Class II bike lanes, a
12-foot Class I bike path, and a 14-foot wide
center paved and striped median. No further
improvements are proposed to Teal Club
Road west of Patterson Road except as may
be require for traffic movements at the Teal
Club Road intersections with Patterson Road
and Victoria Avenue.
Dedicated left turn lanes will be provided
on secondary arterial roads where needed,
subject to City of Oxnard approval.
As a part of Phase 2 of the Specific Plan
Patterson Road along the Phase 2 frontage
shall provide two 16-foot travel lanes with
a right-of way width of 104 feet. The street
section will include an 8-foot on-street
parking area on the east side only, an 8-foot
bike lane on the west side, a 16-foot wide
center median, and a 12-foot wide multi-
purpose trail within a 30-foot wide parkway
on the east side as shown in Figure 4-8.
Phase 1 improvements to Patterson Road
shall consist of the ultimate roadway and
median segments but not the east side multi-
purpose trail and 30-foot parkway or the west
side 10-foot parkway. Class II bike lanes shall
be provided in place of the ultimate parking
areas within the Phase 1 pavement section as
shown in Figure 4-7.
Teal Club Road between Ventura Road
and Patterson Road is to be widened in
two phases. Phase 1 widening is shown in
Figure 4-9 and includes full build-out from
Ventura Road to the new Phase 1 extension
of Coronado Place through the Specific Plan
area. Full build-out provides for four 12-
foot travel lanes with a right-of-way width of
122’ and a curb-to-curb pavement width of
78 feet. The pavement section will provide
for 8-foot Class II bike lanes, a 12-foot Class
I bike path, and a 14-foot wide center paved
and striped median as shown in Figure 4-10.
The paved and striped median will allow for
the continued left-turn access in and out of
existing multiple driveways on the south side
1020
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.85 Figure 4-6 Secondary Arterial - Doris Avenue
Not to Scale
`
`
Ventura Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Teal Club Rd.
Doris Ave.
R/W
R/W
102’
24’
20’
8’
8’
16’
24’
13’16’ 16’ 8’5’
Multi-
Purpose
Trail
Median
City of Oxnard
Landscape
Sidewalk
Class II
Bike
Lane
Class II
Bike
Lane
North side
Existing Improvements
Phase 2
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer. 5’
Land
scape
Landscape
12’
Not a Part
Phase 1
Phase 1 Phase 1
1021
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.86 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 4-7 Secondary Arterial - Patterson Road Phase 1
Not to Scale
Ventura Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Teal Club Rd.
Doris Ave.
P/L
24’
72’ R/W
16’
24’
16’8’ 8’ 8’16’Median
Class II
Bike
Lane
Class II
Bike
Lane
Parkway
Not a
Part
Phase 2
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer.
Phase 1
1022
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.87 `
Figure 4-8 Secondary Arterial - Patterson Road (Ultimate) Not to Scale
Ventura Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Teal Club Rd.
Doris Ave.
24’
150’ AG Buffer
104’ R/W
16’
16’
24’
12’
46’
30’
16’8’ 8’Median
Parkway
Buffer to
Structures
Class II
Bike
Lane
Parking
Multi-
Purpose
Trail
Phase 2
Park
way
10’
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer. Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer.
Not a
Part
Phase 1
Phase 1 Phase 1
1023
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.88 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 4-9 Secondary Arterial Teal Club Road - Phase 1
Not to Scale
R/W
12’
Bike
Lane
Ventura Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Teal Club Rd.
Doris Ave.
Victoria Ave.
Phase 1
(off-site improvements)
R/W
40’
8’ 8’12’
Bike
Lane
Travel
Lane
Travel
Lane
Guardrail
New
Culvert
Phase 1
Phase 2
Not a
Part
Phase 1
Full Build-out in Phase 1
see Fig. 4-10
Teal Club Road
(Phase 1 off-site improvements)
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer.
Phase 2
1024
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.89 `
R/W
122’
Ventura Rd.
Patterson Rd.
Teal Club Rd.
Doris Ave.
R/W
30’ 32’ 32’14’ 14’
8’ 12’ 12’ 12’ 12’ 8’ 8’ 6’
Multi-
Purpose
Trail
Parkway Turn Lane
Class II
Bike
Lane
Class II
Bike
Lane
Land
scape
Side
walk
Figure 4-10 Secondary Arterial - Teal Club Road (Ultimate) Not to Scale
Not a
Part
Phase 2
Phase 1
Phase 1 Build-outPhase 2 Build-out
Teal Club Road
(Ultimate Build-out)
Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer.Note: All cross-sections are conceptual. Final precise street sections to be approved by City Engineer.
Landscape
12’ 5’
Land
scape
13’
1025
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.90 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
4.2.3 BIKE LANES & TRAIL NETWORKS
The bike lane system for the Specific Plan
area is intended to promote walking and
biking within the community, thereby
reducing automobile trips and related
environmental impacts. Figure 4-11 illustrates
the bike lane plan.
The bike lane system within the Specific
Plan area provides safe connections between
residences, employment centers, Public/
Semi-Public uses, the community park, and
transit hub. Arterial roads and Collector
roads shall include clearly marked Class I and
Class II bike lanes.
1026
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.91 Figure 4-11 Bike Path Circulation
PA 5
PA 8
PA 9
PA 1
PA 11 PA 11
PA 10
PA 13 PA 13 PA 14
PA 12
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
Class II
Transit Hub
Multi-Purpose Trail
Roundabout
Choker
0’ 500’
1027
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.92 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
to the entire Specific Plan area. The precise
configuration of water service system for the
proposed project will be determined at the
time individual tract maps are prepared for
each phase of the Specific Plan. Figures 4-13
and 4-14 illustrates the proposed Potable
Water System.
4.3.2 ADVANCED WATER PURIFICATION
WATER SYSTEM
The City of Oxnard will provide water
service to the project area and encourage
water efficient landscapes and conservation.
Greenbelts, common areas, and similar
landscapes shall all utilize “Advanced Water
Purification” water for landscape irrigation
purposes.
4.3.3 WASTEWATER SYSTEM
The City of Oxnard will provide sanitary
sewer service for the project site. All existing
and proposed wastewater lines drain through
a network of pipes to the Oxnard Wastewater
Treatment Plant on Perkins Road. To reduce
potential impacts to the off-site lines, the
east side of the project area will connect to
the Redwood trunk in Ventura Road and the
west side of the project will flow to the trunk
in Victoria Avenue. The exact configuration of
the sewage collection system for the project
will be determined at the time individual
tract maps are prepared for each phase of
the Specific Plan. Figures 4-15 and 4-16
illustrates the proposed Phase 1 and Build-
out (Phase1 and Phase 2) Wastewater System.
The City of Oxnard requires that new
development connect to the city’s existing
wastewater system. Any developer
constructing a new wastewater line is
required to coordinate the construction
and dedication of any such wastewater
system with the city for future operation and
4.3 PUBLIC FACILITIES
This section addresses the public service
requirements for the Teal Club Specific
Plan area. All necessary utilities of sufficient
capacity are either adjacent to or will be
brought to the site as part of the Teal Club
project. Figure 4-12 illustrates existing public
schools, fire stations and civic buildings
near the project area. Utility sizing in the
Specific Plan is preliminary and project-
specific studies will be required at the time
of subdivision approval. Maintenance
funding for Specific Plan infrastructure shall
be provided by Maintenance Community
Facilities District (CFD) or Community
Service Area, subject to approval by the City
of Oxnard.
4.3.1 POTABLE WATER
A goal of the project is to minimize potable
water use. To provide adequate potable
water for the project, the existing agricultural
water rights within the Teal Club Specific
Plan area will be transferred for Municipal
and Industrial uses to the City of Oxnard,
subject to the approval of the Fox Canyon
Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA).
The agricultural water rights for each
property will be transferred to the city after
the approval of a final tract map and prior
to the start of construction. There is no
obligation to transfer agricultural water rights
unless a development project consistent
with the Specific Plan is fully approved
including a final tract map that allows for
the construction of the proposed residential
units. The City of Oxnard will provide potable
water to the site.
The City of Oxnard will be the source of
domestic water for the project. Transmission
mains exist within the plan area and the
Developer will construct any upgrades
required to provide potable water service
1028
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.93 permitted, and maintained in satisfactory
order by a Master Property Association,
Community Facilities District, or other
private entity as approved by the City of
Oxnard. Stormwater lines within private
streets that primarily serve private streets
will be operated and maintained by the Home
Owners’ Association.
4.3.5 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
The City of Oxnard-owned Del Norte
Regional Recycling and Transfer Station
(DNRRTS) will provide solid waste disposal
services to the project area. Any remaining
refuse from the project that cannot be
accommodated by the DNRRTS will be
hauled to other landfill sites in Ventura
County. User fees for collection and disposal
services will be incurred for development
within the project area.
maintenance. The developer will pay for it’s
proportionate share of the off-site wastewater
mitigations identified in the FEIR.
Wastewater lines within private streets will
be operated and maintained by a Community
Facilities District or Service Area.
4.3.4 STORMWATER DRAINAGE
The Teal Club Specific Plan area is located
in the Oxnard Plain Hydrologic Area of the
Santa Clara – Calleguas Hydrologic Unit.
Storm water from the on-site agricultural
fields currently drains to the west and south
from the project site to a manmade channel
along the southern boundaries of the project
area.
The design and sizing of the Teal Club
Specific Plan drainage system is based on a
100-year storm event. The exact configuration
of the drainage system for the project will be
determined at the time individual tract maps
are prepared for each phase of the Specific
Plan. The proposed Phase 1 and Build-out
(Phase 1 and Phase 2) Stormwater Drainage
System drainage system is illustrated in
Figures 4-17 and 4-18.
The design and sizing of the Teal Club
Specific Plan drainage system and water
quality treatment system shall comply with
the applicable National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) MS4 Permit
in force at the time of development, subject
to the interpretation of the governing body
regulating permit issuance. All facilities
within the Specific Plan area shall be funded,
1029
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.94 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 4-12 Public Facilities
PROJECT
Doris Ave.
Channel Islands
Blvd.
Rose Ave.
Gonzales Rd.
Vineyard Ave.
Patterson Rd.
Wooley Rd.
Fifth St.
Victoria Ave.
Teal Club Rd.
Ventura Rd.
Fifth St.
Oxnard Blvd.
Oxnard Blvd.
101 FWY
City of Port Hueneme
Oxnard Airport
Oxnard
High School
Fire
Station 1
Soria
Elementary
School
Civic
Center
Library
Fremont
Intermediate School
Ritchen
Elementary
School
Fire
Station 6
0 4000’
1030
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.95 Figure 4-13 Proposed Phase 1 Water System
PA 5
PA 1
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
EX. 12” WTR
EX. 12” WTR
EX. 16” WTR
12” WTR12” WTR12” WTR
12” WTR12” WTR
12” WTR
12” WTR
Proposed Water
Existing Water
12” WTR
Note: Pipe sizing
is preliminary and
project-specific
studies will be
required at the
time of subdivision
approval
8” WTR
0’ 500’
1031
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.96 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
Existing Water
Note: Pipe sizing
is preliminary and
project-specific
studies will be
required at the
time of subdivision
approval
PA 5
PA 1
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.EX. 12” WTR
EX. 12” WTR
EX. 16” WTR
12” WTR
12” WTR
12” WTR12” WTR
12” WTR
12” WTR
Proposed Water
12” WTR
8” WTR
12” WTR
Figure 4-14 Proposed Build-out water System
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
0’ 500’
1032
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.97 Figure 4-15 Proposed Phase 1 Wastewater System
10” Sewer
EX. 18” Sewer
Phase 1 Proposed Wastewater
Existing Wastewater
PA 5
PA 1
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
EX. 42” Sewer
8”
10” 8”
8”
8”
Note: Pipe sizing
is preliminary and
project-specific
studies will be
required at the
time of subdivision
approval
8”
PA 6
8”
8”
0’ 500’
Potential Sewer Lift Station
1033
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.98 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
Figure 4-16 Proposed Build-out Wastewater System
PA 5
PA 1
PA 8
PA 9 PA 9
PA 10 PA 12
PA 11
PA 10
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
Note: Pipe sizing
is preliminary and
project-specific
studies will be
required at the
time of subdivision
approval
8”
10” 8”
8”
8”
8”
8”
8”
8”
8”
8” 8” 8”
8” 8”
EX. 18” Sewer
EX. 42” Sewer
Proposed Wastewater
Existing Wastewater
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
0’ 500’
Potential Sewer
Lift Station
1034
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.99 Figure 4-17 Proposed Phase 1 Stormwater Drainage System PA 5
PA 1
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
36” SD
48” SD
42” SD
30” SD
Proposed Retention
Proposed Storm Drain
60” SD
48” SD42” SD
30” SD 36” SD
36” SD
48” SD
Note: Pipe sizing
is preliminary and
project-specific
studies will be
required at the
time of subdivision
approval
PA 630” SD
0’ 500’
1035
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.100 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
PA 5
PA 1
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
36” SD
48” SD
42” SD
30” SD
Proposed Retention
Proposed Storm Drain
60” SD
48” SD42” SD
30” SD 36” SD
36” SD
48” SD
Note: Pipe sizing
is preliminary and
project-specific
studies will be
required at the
time of subdivision
approval
Figure 4-18 Proposed Build-out Stormwater Drainage System 30” SD PA 6
PA 8
PA 9 PA 9
PA 10 PA 12
PA 11
PA 10
30” SD
30” SD 30” SD
0’ 500’
1036
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.101 Sheriff’s Department since the property is
within the city’s Sphere of Influence but not
within its current corporate limits. Once
annexed to the city, the Specific Plan area
will be served by the City of Oxnard Police
Department.
Developers within the Teal Club Specific
Plan shall coordinate with the city’s police
department regarding the design standards
and safety protection requirements and
will implement these in the final design and
construction of all residential, commercial
and public structures.
4.3.10 FIRE PROTECTION
The Teal Specific Plan area is served by the
Oxnard Fire Department. Two fire stations
are located in proximity of the project
area; Fire Station 1 and Fire Station 6. Fire
Station 1 is located at 491 South “K” Street,
approximately 1.2 miles east of the Specific
Plan area and would be the primary response
company. Fire Station 6 is located at 2601
Peninsula Road, approximately 2.3 miles
northeast of the project site.
All development within the Specific Plan shall
pay applicable City of Oxnard Fire Protection
fees in place as required by City Ordinances.
The use of non-flammable materials,
especially roofing materials, will be required
for all structures in the Specific Plan area.
4.3.6 NATURAL GAS
The Southern California Gas Company
(SCG) supplies gas resources to the City
of Oxnard. The existing SCG facilities will
serve as primary sources of gas supply for
the Teal Club Specific Plan. SCG will review
the proposed gas piping layout at the design
development phase.
4.3.7 ELECTRICITY
Southern California Edison (SCE) provides
electricity to the project area. The existing
SCE facilities will serve as the primary
sources of electrical supply for the Teal Club
project. All future electrical additions located
within the project boundaries will be placed
underground.
4.3.8 PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Oxnard School District (OSD) and Oxnard
Union High School District (OUHSD) provide
public education services to the project
area. Development of approximately 990
residential units proposed as part of the
Specific Plan would introduce additional
students into the OSD and OUHSD and
increase demand on school facilities. School
fees are used to mitigate impacts associated
with adding incremental amounts of students
to school districts. OSD has acquired a 25-
acre site immediately adjacent to the Teal
Club Specific Plan at the southeast corner
of Doris and Patterson Roads. The district
proposes to construct school facilities to serve
the Kindergarten through 8th Grade students
within the surrounding community, including
the Teal Club Specific Plan area. OUHSD will
house students generated by the project in
existing or future facilities.
4.3.9 POLICE PROTECTION
The Teal Club Specific Plan is served by
the City of Oxnard and the Ventura County
1037
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.102 Infrastructure & Community Services
Teal Club Specific Plan
4.3.11 PARKS & RECREATION
There are two public parks in the plan area:
the Phase 1 and 2 portions of the ten-acre
centrally located Neighborhood Park and the
7.3 acre Phase 2 southwest area park. The
central east-west greenbelt creates a visible
connection for public gathering, organized
recreation, walking, and biking.
Both public parks will be owned and
maintained by the City of Oxnard and
serve a portion of the recreational needs
of the plan area and the existing nearby
neighborhoods. Maintenance funding shall
be provided by a city-approved funding
mechanism established and formed by the
developers of the Specific Plan and financed
by all development within the Specific Plan
as provided for in the Project Development
Agreement(s). Turf play areas, playground
equipment, bathrooms, and picnic tables will
be incorporated into these parks, subject to
final design approval by the City of Oxnard.
Private recreation facilities shall be included
within each multi-family project to meet a
portion of recreational needs as determined
during the Planned Development Permit
approval process.
1038
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 4 - Infrastructure & Community Services p.103
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
1039
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.104 Environmental Resources
5 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
5.1 OVERVIEW
The City of Oxnard strives to be a leader
in environmental resource sustainability.
This chapter focuses on implementing long-
established state and federal regulations and
should be used in conjunction with Chapter
2 - Sustainable Community, which focuses
on new environmental issues such as climate
change.
5.2 WATER RESOURCES
The Teal Club Specific Plan provides
important implementation measures for the
city’s water resource management goals.
5.2.1 WATER SUPPLY
The Teal Club Specific Plan provides for the
transfer of historic agricultural pumping
rights to the city for municipal uses. The
transfer reduces the amount of water that
may be extracted from the aquifer and the
existing wells will be capped.
5.2.2 ADVANCED WATER PURIFICATION
WATER
The Teal Club site is located on Ventura Road
where the City of Oxnard water infrastructure
has been installed. With the addition of the
Advanced Water Purification program the
water distributed throughout the project
site will be primarily locally sourced and will
reduce the environmental impacts associated
with imported water.
5.3 AESTHETIC RESOURCES
5.3.1 OPEN SPACE
The 17-plus acres of Neighborhood Parks will
provide a healthy and scenic outdoor asset
while the tree-lined Multi-Purpose Trail and
agricultural buffer will provide a pleasing
background for residents and the larger
community.
5.3.2 ROADWAYS
New 14 to 16-foot landscaped medians will
be added to Ventura Road, Doris Avenue and
Patterson Road. Large, landscaped parkways
(15-30 feet) will separate arterial streets from
the project. A greenbelt along Beverly Drive
will provide a pleasant walking or biking
1040
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 5 - Environmental Resources p.105 connection to the community park, schools
and the Mixed Use area.
5.4 CHARACTER ENHANCEMENT
The Teal Club Specific Plan seeks to create
an environment where most of the services
and activities for residents and employees
are located within walking distance of
their homes or offices. Encouraging
walking requires appropriate destinations
and linkages as well as the creation of a
pedestrian-friendly environment. The Teal
Club Specific Plan therefore incorporates
traditional neighborhood design components
that promote “porch and street orientation”
that fosters personal interaction between
private buildings and the public realm.
Courtyard/Cluster homes (R-2) include
porches and architectural elements reflecting
the early twentieth century diversity and
character of style evident in the nearby
Oxnard Historic District.
Providing nodes of activity also enhances the
pedestrian experience. The neighborhood
park is located at the mid-point of the main
pedestrian axis through the site so that it is a
visible destination for most residents.
5.5 LANDSCAPE DESIGN
Landscaping is intended to be native or
adapted species in all open space areas and
should need minimal irrigation after a grow-
in period. Trees are an important part of the
overall landscape plan and will be selected
based on a number of criteria as defined in
the Landscaping Design Guidelines section of
this Specific Plan.
5.6 AGRICULTURE
Existing agricultural fields to the west of the
project area will be buffered according to the
County of Ventura Agricultural/Urban Buffer
Policy revised July 19, 2006. A minimum
150-foot buffer area with a vegetative screen
as defined in the county’s buffer policy will
be placed between agricultural uses and
the new developed uses. The Phase 2 park
and Patterson Road provide the permanent
west edge project buffer. The development
of Phase 1 will also buffer the remaining
agricultural fields located in Phase 2 of the
Specific Plan until such time as Phase 2 is
developed. The Phase 1 Agricultural Buffer is
shown in Figure 8-1.
5.7 AIR QUALITY
In addition to standard construction
mitigation measures, the land-use and zoning
of the Teal Club Specific Plan co-locates a
variety of uses in order to minimize vehicle
miles traveled. Jobs, housing, public/semi-
public uses, Urban Village commercial
services (restaurants, shops, childcare,
etc.), recreational opportunities and transit
options will be connected by safe, attractive
greenbelts, trails and bikeways. When
combined with the features identified in
Chapter 2 -Sustainable Community, the Teal
Club Specific Plan will effectively reduce the
number of vehicle miles that residents need
to travel due to the availability of services and
alternative modes of transportation listed
above.
1041
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.106 Safety & Hazards
6 SAFETY & HAZARDS
6.1 OVERVIEW
This chapter addresses both the safety
and noise factors relevant to the Teal Club
Specific Plan.
6.2 AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY
The Teal Club Specific Plan is located just
north of the Oxnard Municipal Airport and
within the airport’s Sphere of Influence. The
site lies directly below the landing pattern
for aircraft approaching the airport from the
northwest. The Airport Air Safety Zones map
and project location are shown in Figure
6-1. Therefore, the Teal Club Specific Plan is
designed to meet the conditions identified in
the Ventura County Comprehensive Airport
Land Use Plan (ACLUP) for sites located
within the Traffic Pattern Zone (TPZ):
□ The structural coverage of residential
units is less than 25% of the overall site
area
□ The structural coverage of commercial or
industrial development is less than 50% of
the site area.
□ An avigation easement will be granted to
the County of Ventura.
The land use density maximums in this
section apply to the overall Specific Plan
area. Each development phase shall show
compliance with these overall density
requirements as part of the Tentative Tract
Map filing for both the proposed development
and the cumulative development.
Further, the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) has jurisdiction over development
proposals under Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 77. Potential noise impacts
from airport operations will be analyzed
through the project’s Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) and mitigations implemented.
The project plans shall address landscape
materials the size and location of trees to
minimize any potential hazard.
6.3 NOISE
The project’s location next to the Oxnard
Airport requires that all buildings include
noise buffering. The noise analysis and
mitigations are detailed in the EIR.
6.4 TRAFFIC & PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
The Teal Club Specific Plan circulation plan
is designed to enhance the safety and comfort
of all modes of transportation. Street widths
have been minimized and most allow on-
street parking which slows vehicular traffic.
Wide sidewalks are separated from traffic
with landscaped parkways and a Class I trail
links much of the residential land uses to
both the Commercial Mixed Use area and
neighborhood park. Design guidelines require
buildings to front the streets with porches
or storefronts. This keeps more “eyes on the
street” to further increase safety.
Figure 4-18 Proposed Build-
out Stormwater Drainage
System
1042
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 6 - Safety & Hazards p.107 Figure 4-18 Proposed Build-
out Stormwater Drainage
System
Figure 6-1 Air Safety Zones Map
1043
p.108 Housing
Teal Club Specific Plan
7 HOUSING & URBAN VILLAGE
CONCEPT
7.1 OVERVIEW
The Teal Club Specific Plan is an important
component of the implementation of the City
of Oxnard 2030 General Plan, the City of
Oxnard General Plan Housing Element and
the State-approved Regional Housing Needs
Assessment. The Specific Plan, General Plan
Housing Element and the State-approved
Regional Housing Needs Assessment allows
for the development of 990 residential
dwelling units in a variety of densities,
product types and price ranges to meet the
City’s growing population.
7.2 URBAN VILLAGE CONCEPT
This Specific Plan is a City of Oxnard-
designated Urban Village. As discussed
throughout the Specific Plan, the design
guidelines, housing types, mix of land uses,
and landscape and pedestrian orientation
concepts implement a neo-traditional town
planning concept. Chapter 3 of the 2030
Oxnard General Plan addresses the vision
to guide future development in the City. In
particular, Community Development Goal
CD-7 calls for the “Development of vibrant
mixed-use urban villages characterized
by a mix of land uses, transit accessibility,
pedestrian orientation, and neighborhood
identity.”
General Plan Policy CD-7.1 defines the
implementation of Goal CD-7 as follows:
Establishment of Urban Villages
Six areas of the City are initially designated
as Urban Villages. A specific plan for
each area shall be prepared in advance of
implementing an Urban Village in a specific
authorized location. Additional Urban
Villages and guidelines may be subsequently
adopted by the City Council. Urban Villages
shall be characterized by:
□ Infill and/or development of formerly
agricultural land
□ Reinvestment in the existing community
□ Mixture of land uses
□ Mix of residential densities and housing
types
□ Providing a minimum of 15 percent
affordable housing
□ Location along or near corridors,
downtown, and transit nodes
□ Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle
circulation given high priority
1044
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 7 - Housing p.109
Within the General Plan the Teal Club
Specific Plan is further described as follows:
TEAL CLUB SPECIFIC PLAN
Location. Teal Club Road, Patterson Road,
Doris Avenue, and Ventura Road.
Land Use. Transit oriented residential with
supporting mixed use, schools, parks, and
neighborhood commercial services.
Overview. The intent of this urban village
is to encourage neo-traditional town
planning compatible with surrounding uses
and the Oxnard Airport with a focus on
sustainability by using green building and
planning principles, provision of adequate
public and semi-public uses, transit-oriented
development, and an identity-creating entry
component facing Ventura Road. A central
focus of this development will be in the
provision of balanced community with jobs,
school, recreation, shopping, and affordable
and market-rate housing.
The Teal Club Specific Plan, as formulated
within this document, implements the
General Plan Urban Village Goal CD-7.
The land use plan, community layout and
development standards and guidelines
ensure that the objective criteria of General
Plan Policy CD-7.1 will be implemented
upon completion of the Specific Plan. The
General Plan Overview description of the
Teal Club Specific Plan is also fully-realized
by the implementation of this Specific Plan
document. To achieve an appropriate mix
of housing the Specific Plan has established
density ranges for each Planning Area. These
density ranges provide for a wide variety
of housing types to meet a diverse range of
community housing needs. Unit types will
include Medium-High Density market-rate
and affordable income-restricted apartments
(18 to 30 units per acre), condominium and
townhome for-sale housing (12 to 18 units per
acre) and detached small-lot, single-family
homes (7 to 12 units per acre). Within these
product types there will be a range in unit
sizes to accommodate single occupancy as
well as larger household groupings.
7.3 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING
As an Urban Village the Teal Club Specific
Plan will provide for fifteen percent of
the overall unit count to be affordable,
inclusionary housing based on household
income as defined by the California Health
and Safety Code. Of this fifteen percent total
requirement, the following percentages of
income levels shall apply:
40% - Very Low Income
60% - Lower Income
The qualifying inclusionary units may be co-
located in multi-family buildings or dispersed
throughout the project but shall be built with
a similar quality of materials and amenities
so as not to be distinguishable from market-
rate units.
1045
p.110 Housing
Teal Club Specific Plan
Phase 1 of the Specific Plan shall be required
to provide the inclusionary units for Phase
1 within the Phase 1 boundary. These
inclusionary, affordable units shall be
constructed in PA 5 and/or PA 6, as the
developer may elect.
In the event that land is donated to the
City or a qualified affordable housing
developer within Phase 1 specifically for
a 100% affordable, inclusionary housing
project, that project may apply for any and
all density bonus provisions provided under
Local or State Law in force at the time of the
affordable, inclusionary project approval.
Any density bonus project approved under
Local or State density bonus provisions shall
be evaluated as required under the applicable
California Environmental Quality Act and
other Local or State laws.
Phase 2 of the Specific Plan shall be required
to provide the inclusionary units for Phase
2 within the Phase 2 boundary. In the
event that land is donated to the City or a
qualified affordable housing developer within
Phase 2 specifically for a 100% affordable,
inclusionary housing project, that project
may apply for any and all density bonus
provisions provided under Local or State
Law in force at the time of the affordable,
inclusionary project approval. Any density
bonus project approved under Local or State
density bonus provisions shall be evaluated
as required under the applicable California
Environmental Quality Act and other Local or
State laws.
7.4 RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX
The mix of residential units is intended to
meet existing and future community needs.
The unit mix and unit sizes shall be evaluated
by City staff and Planning Commissioners as
part of the development review and approval
process for subdivisions and individual
discretionary permits within the Specific
Plan. This review shall include consideration
of the inclusion of very small units, multi-
generational units, large households,
seniors or special needs. The density ranges
encourage a combination of detached,
attached and multi-story units to meet the
widest range of household types possible in
a pedestrian-friendly and transit-accessible
location.
1046
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 7 - Housing p.111
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
1047
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.112 Implementation
Teal Club Specific Plan
8 IMPLEMENTATION
8.1 PHASING
The project includes two major phases based
on ownership as illustrated in Figure 8-1
and 8-2. Development of the Specific Plan
is anticipated to occur over a five to ten year
period. As a result, there will be a number
of individual projects and sub-phases within
each phase. Development of the major land
use components may occur independently
of one another or in parts. It is intended
that agricultural production continue, to
the degree economically feasible, on the
undeveloped segments of the Specific Plan
area. The right to farm under generally
accepted standards near development is
accorded to each property within the Specific
Plan area.
The project developer shall construct,
repair, and/or upgrade as necessary the
infrastructure improvements that are within
the project site and serve only the project
at its sole cost and expense. The project
developer shall construct, repair, and/or fund
the infrastructure upgrades necessary beyond
the project boundary as required to serve
both the project and the city. Infrastructure
reimbursement agreements shall be required
between all developments within the Specific
Plan to ensure an equitable, proportional
sharing of backbone infrastructure costs.
The Specific Plan EIR Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program shall be utilized
as the guiding document for providing a
logical extension of necessary infrastructure
to support development of individual
Planning Areas within the overall project.
As development occurs within the Specific
Plan area onsite and offsite roadway
improvements shall be provided to insure
that traffic impacts within and beyond the
Specific Plan area are mitigated. Other
infrastructure improvements including
“Advanced Water Purification” water, sewer
service, storm drains and water quality
treatment systems, and public utilities
shall be provided to serve the needs of the
individual Planning Areas and project phases.
The extent and sequence of phases of
development will be approved through
the City’s development review process
and subdivision map approval process
with implementation of the utility master
plans, as contained in this Specific Plan, as
required to provide necessary utility services.
Each development shall be responsible
for improvements within their individual
project boundary as defined within the Phase
1 and Phase 2 Development Agreements
and the future implementing entitlement
Subdivisions, Tract Maps, and project
Conditions of Approval.
8.2 AGRICULTURAL BUFFERS
Agricultural buffers are required to separate
new development from existing agricultural
uses. The primary agricultural buffer will be
parallel to Patterson Road adjacent to Phase 2
development. It will be installed concurrently
with the Patterson Drive road improvements
identified in Chapter 4 - Infrastructure.
The Agricultural buffer area extends into
1048
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 8 - Implementation p.113
the neighborhood Park along Patterson
Road. Uses within the buffer area shall
conform to the Ventura County Agricultural
Commission’s adopted policies.
Interim agricultural buffers may be necessary
between Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Teal Club
Specific Plan. The first phase shall provide
a full 150-foot structural setback buffer
adjacent to any remaining agricultural uses as
shown in Figure 8-1.
8.3 FINANCING DISTRICTS
At the developer’s request, the City shall,
pursuant to California Government Code
Section 53311 et. seq., establish a Community
Facilities District for capital improvements
and create bonded indebtedness to finance
the construction or acquisition of certain
facilities such as roads, utilities, drainage,
public facilities and other infrastructure.
If the City and Developer choose to, the City
shall, pursuant to California Government
Code Section 53311 et. seq., establish a
Community Facilities District for the purpose
of funding the maintenance costs of certain
improvements such as roads, utilities,
drainage facilities, parks, landscaping and
public facilities.
8.4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
All development within the Teal Club Specific
Plan area is subject to the standards and
guidelines in this Specific Plan. As part of
the discretionary permit review process (i.e.,
staff review, development design review
permit, Special Use Permit, subdivision
map approval, etc.), the City of Oxnard shall
review project submittals for consistency with
these standards and guidelines. Subdivision
maps and related discretionary permits
shall be processed in accordance with the
procedures established by the City of Oxnard
and defined within the City of Oxnard
Municipal Code.
8.5 SPECIFIC PLAN ADMINISTRATION
The Specific Plan includes development
and design guidelines but cannot anticipate
every potential condition requiring decisions
within the development review process.
Any subsequent discretionary approval or
amendment to the Specific Plan must be
consistent with the General Plan as amended
and/or updated.
Development applications that are not in
substantial conformance with the Specific
Plan or that may require an amendment to
the Specific Plan shall be governed by the
following processes under the following four
application categories: Minor Modifications,
Major Modifications, Specific Plan
Amendments, and Special Use Permits.
8.5.1 MINOR MODIFICATIONS
The following items may deviate, within
specified limitations, from the adopted
Specific Plan but shall be considered to be in
Substantial Conformance with the Specific
Plan. This revision shall occur concurrent
with the applicable discretionary permits.
1049
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.114 Implementation
Teal Club Specific Plan
`
PA 5
PA 1
Phase 1
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
STREET “A”
END
STREET “B”
CORONADO ST.
BEVERLY DR.
Roadways & Utilities
Built in Phase 1 Agricultural Use
Phase 2
150’ Non-Structural Setback Area
Figure 8-1 Proposed Phased Improvement Plan - Phase 1
PA 6
0’ 500’
Phase 2
Phase 1
Not a Part
Roadways Constructed by
Oxnard School District
1050
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 8 - Implementation p.115
Roadways & Utilities
Built in Phase 2 Agricultural Use
150’ Non-Structural Setback Area0’ 500’
Roadways Constructed by
Oxnard School District
Not a Part
PA 5
PA 1
PA 4
PA 3
PA 6
PA 7
PA 2
TEAL CLUB RD.
VENTURA RD.
PATTERSON RD.
DORIS AVE.
STREET “A”
STREET “B”
PA 6
Figure 8-2 Proposed Build-out Improvement Plan
PA 10
PA 11 PA 11
PA 9
PA 12
PA 13 PA 13 PA 14
1051
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.116 Implementation
Teal Club Specific Plan
8.5.2 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
Amendments may be requested at any
time pursuant to Section 65453(a) of
the California Government Code. Any
proposed modification to the Specific Plan
beyond the defined limits of the Minor or
Major Modification will be processed as a
Specific Plan Amendment. Depending upon
the nature of the proposed Specific Plan
Amendment, additional environmental
analysis may be required, pursuant to Section
15162 of the California Environmental
Quality Act.
8.6 MITIGATION MONITORING &
REPORTING PROGRAM
Refer to the Teal Club Specific Plan EIR
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program for implementation and reporting of
the Mitigation Measures.
Examples of Minor Modifications include the
following:
□ Final facility sizing and alignment
of water, sewer, and storm drain
improvements (as directed by the City
Engineer);
□ Change in utility and/or infrastructure
serving agency;
□ Alignment of streets within
neighborhoods so long as the number and
approximate spacing of connections is
in general conformance with the Specific
Plan Land Use Plan;
□ Local street, road, and multi-purpose trail
alignments provided that connecting of
destination points in maintained;
□ Minor landscape and streetscape design
modifications consistent with the Design
Guidelines contained in this document
and approved through the development
review process;
□ Deletion of utility infrastructure deemed
unnecessary by the City Engineer.
□ Re-distribution of dwelling units between
Planning Areas provided that the re-
distribution falls with the allowed density
for each affected Planning Area.
1052
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 8 - Implementation p.117
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
1053
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.118 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
1054
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.119 9 GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY
The Teal Club Specific Plan is a defined
Urban Village and Specific Plan area within
the City of Oxnard General Plan. The
California Government Code (Sections
65450 through 65457) permits the adoption
and administration of Specific Plans as an
implementation tool for elements contained
in the l ocal General Plan. As a result, Specific Plans must demonstrate c onsistency in
regulations, guidelines and programs with
the goals and policies set forth in the General
Plan.
The City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan
contains the following elements that relate
to the consistency analysis for the Teal Club
Specific Plan: Sustainable Community,
Community Development, Infrastructure
& Community Services, Environmental
Resources, Safety & Hazards and Housing.
An exhaustive review and analysis of each
of these elements has been conducted as
a part of the Teal Club Specific Plan Draft
Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The
Teal Club Specific Plan DEIR General Plan
Consistency Analysis was prepared by Rincon
Consultants under the direction of the City of
Oxnard.
The following pages list the applicable
City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan Policies
and provide a discussion of the project
impacts, mitigations and consistency upon
implementation of the Specific Plan and
Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR)
mitigation measures. In each case the DEIR
analysis confirms that the Teal Club Specific
Plan is either deemed Consistent with the
applicable General Plan Policy or Potentially
Consistent with the applicable General
Plan Policy, subject to final confirmation
by conformance with the mitigations and
requirements to be set forth in the FEIR.
The Teal Club Specific Plan, located entirely
within the City of Oxnard’s established
City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB),
has been identified in the approved City of
Oxnard 2030 General Plan as one of the last
remaining major parcels for development
within the ultimate City of Oxnard
boundaries. Upon annexation to the City
of Oxnard and subsequent completion of
the infrastructure improvements outlined
within the Teal Club Specific Plan and FEIR
Mitigation Measures there would be no
significant impacts to public services within
the City of Oxnard.
The Teal Club Specific Plan mix of residential,
commercial, industrial, recreational and
transit connections will contribute to the
overall economic and cultural vitality of
the City of Oxnard. The City of Oxnard
will receive economic benefits from the
tax-increment revenue derived from the
development of the Specific Plan area. The
Specific Plan shall provide for self-funding of
internal community infrastructure through
the formation of a Maintenance Community
Facilities District (CFD) or Community
Service Area, subject to approval by the City
of Oxnard.
1055
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.120 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY
SC-3.1. New Residential Development.
Encourage incorporation of passive and
active energy and resources conservation
design and devices in new residential
development and substantial remodels
and/or expansions.
Level II - Consistent Mitigation Measures AQ-2(b)
and AQ-2(c) require that construction and building
management contracts for residential development
within the TCSP include energy saving requirements
mandated by State Green Building Code, as amended
during the life of the project. Mitigation AQ-2(c) also required that all structures include passive energy
conservation design elements, including building
material massing, orientation, architectural elements
(deeply recessed windows, eave overhangs, etc.),
landscape shading, or low-impact materials, window
glazing to increase insulation, and water circulation
pumps to reduce water use, and/or similar measures
shown to be equally effective. This mitigation measure
that applies to all development proposed within
the TCSP and within the nine parcels proposed for
Annexation.
SC-3.8. Require Use of Passive Energy
Conservation Design. As part of the City
and Community EAP’s, require the use of
passive energy conservation by building
material massing, orientation, landscape
shading, materials, and other techniques
as part of the design of local buildings,
where feasible.
SC-3.12. Encourage Natural Ventilation
Review and revise applicable planning
and building policies and regulations
to promote use of natural ventilation in
new construction and major additions
or remodeling consistent with Oxnard’s
temperate climate.
Level II - Consistent Mitigation Measure AQ-2(e)
requires all applicants for all projects within the
TCSP area and within the nine parcels proposed for
Annexation to include natural ventilation in building
design plans whenever feasible, as required by the State Green Building Code, as amended during the life of the
project.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CD 1.4. Transportation Choices.
Promote the application of land use and
community designs that provide residents
with the opportunity for a variety of
transportation choices (pedestrian,
bicycle, transit, automobile).
Level I - Consistent The TCSP consists of traditional
neighborhood design components that promote “porch
and street orientation” and encourage walking and
interaction between residents. Medium and Medium-
High Density areas would orient to internal pathways
and common areas with connection to the public
walking network and to the Urban Village. The Urban
Village would be oriented around a public plaza, and
would be within walking distance of residential units
and readily accessible to a new bus stop on Ventura
Road (Section 2.0, Project Description).
1056
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.121 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD 1.5. Housing Variety. Promote the
development of a variety of housing
types throughout the City including
apartments, condominiums, lofts,
townhouses, and attached and detached
single family units.
Level I - Consistent. The TCSP envisions development
of up to 990 residential dwelling units in a variety of densities and product types including both market-rate
and affordable housing. In addition to single-family
residential units, the TCSP includes single-family
courtyard homes, single-family townhomes and multi-
family condominiums and apartments (Section 2.0,
Project Description).
CD 1.6. Public Facilities. Enhance
resident quality of life by providing
adequate space for schools, libraries,
parks and recreation areas, as well as
space for the expansion of public facilities
to support the community’s vision.
Level I - Consistent. The TCSP includes a 6.5-acre
public (City) Community Park (PA 8) with playground
equipment, picnic tables, restrooms, and backstops
and fencing for softball/baseball play and soccer use.
Within the residential and commercial PA’s, a 6.5-acre
community park, a 3.5-acre community park, and a
7.4-acre community park combine for a total of 17.4
park and open space acres. Combined with the Beverly
Dr. greenbelt, the TCSP would provide 17.8 gross
acres of public parks and open space, about 12% of the
project acreage.
CD 1.7. Compact Development. Promote
the use of development patterns that are
more compactly built and use space in an
efficient aesthetic manner as part of the
community vision.
Level I - Consistent. High-density residential zones are 30 or more dwelling units per acre and medium-high
zones are 18 to 30 dwelling units per acre, as described in the City of Oxnard General Plan 2030. The TCSP
would include maximum densities of between 10 and
30 dwelling units per acre. The general distribution of densities for the site is included in the 2030 General
Plan Land Use map, and the proposed TCSP generally
adheres to that distribution.
CD 1.8. Natural Resource Conservation.
Promote a high quality of life within
the community, incorporating the
retention of natural open space areas,
greenbelts, and the provision of adequate
recreational facilities.
Level I - Consistent. As discussed in Section 4.4,
Biological Resources, the project area does not include any natural open space areas, as it is currently used
for agricultural activities and urban development. The
project area is adjacent to agricultural areas to the west that are outside of the CURB boundary. Approximately
17.76 acres of open space and parks are proposed within the TCSP area. As discussed in Section 4.12 Public
Services and Recreation, this acreage would exceed the
required 12 acres of parkland for the project.
1057
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.122 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD 1.9. Commute Reduction. Minimize
the commuting distances between
residential concentrations and
employment centers by encouraging
the development of mixed land uses in
appropriate areas.
Level I - Consistent. Medium and Medium-High
Density areas in the TCSP would orient to internal
pathways and common areas with connection to
the public walking network, the proposed Business
Research Park zone (PA 13 and 14), the proposed
commercial zones (PA 6 and 7), and the nine parcels
south of Teal Club Road which would be rezoned for
employment-generating uses.
CD 1.10. Jobs-Housing Balance. Consider
the effects of land use proposals and
decisions on efforts to maintain an
appropriate jobs-housing balance ratio.
Level I - Consistent. The TCSP includes residential
uses, as well as retail, office, and a business and
research park, which would offer job opportunities to
residents. The adopted VCOG 2040 forecast projects a
total of 83,328 jobs and 71,602 households for the City of Oxnard by the year 2040. Therefore, the 2040 jobs/
housing ratio would be 1.16:1 which is within the range of 1.1 and 1.34 jobs per housing unit, the acceptable
jobs/housing ratio range identified by the VCOG
(VCOG, May 2008). With the additional 2,651 jobs and
net increase of 988 housing units under the proposed
Specific Plan, the jobs/housing would change to 1.18:1
(more skewed towards a greater number of jobs than
housing units) but would still be within the acceptable jobs/housing ratio. Therefore, the project would not
move the City’s ratio out of the VCOG range.
CD 1.12. Avoiding Encroaching the
Oxnard Airport. Retain land within the
airport hazard area as permanent open
space as shown on the Land Use Map or
otherwise recommended by the County
Department of Airports.
Level II - Consistent. Development of the Specific Plan would place residential and commercial uses within
2,000 feet of the Oxnard Airport runway, potentially
exposing people residing and working in the area to
safety hazards. However, no habitable development
is proposed within the airport’s inner or outer safety
zone, and as discussed in Section 4.7, Hazards and
Hazardous Materials, the probability of an accident
occurring in the Plan Area is low. Further, the presence of nearby emergency landing areas would reduce
accident hazards. Safety would be further ensured
through mitigation measures HAZ-5(a-c). The City of
Oxnard has referred the proposed project to the ALUC
for review and comment. The ALUC has determined
that the Project is consistent with the Airport
Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The City must consider
the comments of the ALUC prior to making a decision
on adoption of the Specific Plan.
1058
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.123 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD 3.1. Neighborhood Preservation.
Protect existing residential neighborhoods
from the encroachment of incompatible
activities and land uses as determined
through environmental review and/
or determination by the Planning
Commission.
Level II - Consistent. The development within the
TCSP would be compatible with the existing residential
neighborhood located to the north of the TCSP area.
The proposed Urban Village would locate residential
uses adjacent to the existing residences. Residences to the east are across Ventura Road from the project area, which would provide a buffer from the neighborhood
commercial and higher density residential uses
proposed in the eastern portion of the TCSP area.
CD 4.1. Mitigate Land Use Conflicts.
Mitigate conflicts between commercial
and other land uses, especially residential
and recreational uses.
Level II - Consistent. Proposed commercial uses in
the TCSP would not be located directly adjacent to
any existing residential or recreational uses. Existing residences to the east of proposed commercial land
use in PA 6 and 7 are across Ventura Road from the
project area, which would provide a buffer from the
neighborhood commercial uses.
CD 5.1. Industrial Clustering. Encourage
the clustering of industrial uses into
areas that have common needs and are
compatible in order to maximize their
efficiency.
Level II - Consistent. The nine parcels (11.4 acres
combined) to be Annexed south of Teal Club Road are
a mix of vacant land and existing small residential and industrial development. Upon Annexation, these nine
parcels would be zoned Light Manufacturing (M-1) by
the City of Oxnard and would encourage the clustering
of industrial uses. The airport area is designated by
the City as an area where industrial uses are allowed.
Business and Research Park uses are also proposed for
the TCSP area nearest to the airport (PA 13 and 14).
CD 5.2. Compatible Land Use. Ensure
adequate separation between sensitive
land uses (residential, educational, open
space, healthcare) to minimize land use
incompatibility associated with noise,
odors, and air pollutant emissions.
Level II - Consistent. The proposed industrial
component of the Specific Plan would be compatible
with existing industrial uses as well as the adjacent
agricultural, open space, and residential land uses with incorporation of the mitigation measures specified in
Section 4.2, Agriculture. See Section 4.7, Hazards and
Hazardous Materials and Section 4.10, Noise for further discussion regarding compatibility. The proposed
Business and Research Park uses in PA 13 and 14 would
not include heavy manufacturing uses likely to produce
incompatible odors.
1059
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.124 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD 5.3. Available Services. Encourage
industrial activities to locate where
municipal services are available
including adequate storm drainage and
water facilities, as well as easy access to
multiple modes of transportation.
Level I - Consistent. The nine parcels (11.4 acres
combined) to be Annexed south of Teal Club Road are
a mix of vacant land and existing small residential and industrial development. Municipal services currently
exist in this area including water and sewer lines. When projects are proposed within the nine parcels and in the TCSP area, they would be required to comply with this
2030 General Plan policy and with existing regulations
for stormwater. The project area is accessible to bicycle lanes and bus stops.
CD 5.5. “Green” Major Transportation
Routes. Guide industrial development
to locate near transportation facilities
capable of handling goods movements in
an efficient manner without decreasing
the level of service on the transportation
network or dividing existing
neighborhoods.
Level I - Consistent. Industrial development would
be located in the vicinity of major transportation
routes including Ventura Road, Fifth Street and
Victoria Avenue, and would not divide an existing
neighborhood, as discussed above under Impact
LU-1. The nine parcels south of Teal Club Road
proposed for Annexation, which could be rezoned for
industrial uses, are located adjacent to the Oxnard
Airport, generally surrounded by other industrial land
uses and commercial development, and no existing
neighborhood is located on either side of the parcels.
The parcels are located within 2.5 miles of Highway
101, a major transportation route.
1060
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.125 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD 6.1. Agricultural Buffers. Require
that agricultural land uses designated
for long-term protection and production
be buffered from urban land uses
through the use of techniques including,
but not limited to, greenbelts, open
space setbacks, fencing, berming, and
windrows.
Level II - Consistent. As described in Section 4.2,
Agricultural Resources, and Mitigation Measure AG-
2, which requires interim agricultural buffers, Phase
1 would include 91.83 acres of the site and interim
agricultural buffers are proposed to allow Phase 2
owners to continue farming indefinitely. Phase 1 would
also include all internal roadway circulation needed to service Phase 1. Proposed agricultural buffers would
be 300 feet or 150 feet wide with a double row of
appropriate trees (windrows). All proposed Phase 1
roads would be built and operable; residences for lots
in the Phase 1 area within 150-foot buffers would not
be built until Phase 2 is committed to development.
Trespassing, vandalism, and pilferage impacts would
be reduced through the development of the Community
Park separating agricultural production and proposed
urban land uses. Agricultural uses to the west would
be buffered by open space planning areas and North
Patterson Road. Finally, the community park (PA 10)
would provide a buffer between the residential and
business park use and agricultural use to the west.
CD 6.2. Agricultural Preservation.
Preserve agricultural land and uses
within the Oxnard Planning Area unless
other uses are allowed through a future
CURB amendment and/or applicable
exemptions.
Level II - Consistent. When voters approved the city’s
Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (“SOAR”)
initiative in 1998, the Teal Club site was located inside the urban growth boundary (“CURB”).
1061
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.126 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD-7.1 Establishment of Urban Villages: Six areas
of the City are initially designated as Urban Villages.
It is the intent of the Urban Village designation
that specific or strategic plans for each area will be
prepared in advance of the planning entitlement
process. Additional Urban Villages and guidelines
may be subsequently adopted by the City Council*.
Urban Villages are envisioned as characterized by:
• Infill and/or development of
formerly agricultural land
• Reinvestment in the existing
community
• Mixture of land uses
• Mix of residential densities and
housing types
• Providing a minimum of 15
percent affordable housing
• Location along or near corridors,
downtown, and transit nodes
• Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle
circulation given high priority
Teal Club Specific Plan:
• Location. Teal Club Road, Patterson
Road, Doris Avenue, and Ventura
Road.
• Land Use. Transit oriented residential
with supporting mixed use, schools, parks,
and neighborhood commercial services.
• Overview. The intent of this urban village
is to encourage neotraditional town
planning compatible with surrounding
uses and the Oxnard Airport with a focus on
sustainability by using green building and
planning principles, provision of adequate
public semi-public uses, transit-oriented
development, and an identity creating entry
component facing Ventura Road. A central
balanced community with jobs, school,
recreation, shopping, and affordable and
market-rate housing.
Level I - Consistent. The proposed TCSP
would be consistent with the 2030 General
Plan’s Urban Village policy, as it is one of
the areas specifically defined as an Urban
Village. The TCSP would provide a mix
of land uses including but not limited to
commercial, retail, business research,
residential, public/semipublic uses, and
open space.
The TCSP envisions development of up
to 990 residential dwelling units in a
variety of densities and product types
including both market-rate and affordable
housing (15% affordable). In addition to
single-family residential units, the TCSP
includes single-family courtyard homes,
single-family townhomes and multi-family
condominiums and apartments (Section
2.0, Project Description).
The TCSP would be located within 2.5 miles
of Highway 101, a major transportation
route and would provide access to other
public transportation options, including
Gold Coast Transit buses.
The Urban Village would be oriented
around a public plaza, and would be within
walking distance of residential units and
readily accessible to bus pull-out locations
on southbound and northbound lanes of
Ventura Road which would be built as
part of the project. The planned bus stops
would serve the project area and would
help provide public transit options. Leasing
preferences and incentives may be required
so that the Urban Village provides a mix of
uses that reduce vehicle trips by residents
(Section 2.0, Project Description).
1062
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.127 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD-7.5 Pedestrian and Transit
Scale. Design urban village areas to
be pedestrian-oriented and transit
accessible, incorporating block patterns,
walking routes and edges, social
orientation of buildings, and streetscapes
to provide ease of walking and safety.
Level I - Consistent. The urban village would be
oriented around a public plaza, and would be within
walking distance of residential units and readily
accessible to bus pull-out locations on southbound
and northbound lanes of Ventura Road, which would
be built as part of the project. The planned bus stops
would serve the project area and would help provide
public transit options. One of the project objectives
is to create an integrated vehicular, pedestrian and
bicycle circulation system that connects residential,
industrial, commercial and institutional uses within
the project area. The proposed project would involve
pedestrian, bicycle, and transit improvements as
discussed in Section 2.0, Project Description, and
shown in Figure 2-4.
CD-7.6 Connectivity. Provide
connectivity to other activity nodes in the
form of roadways, transit connections,
and bicycle and pedestrian linkages that
encourages non-vehicular travel modes.
Urban villages should be considered
major transit transfer points and have
amenities oriented towards transit users.
CD-7.7 Urban Village Streetscapes
and Identification. Include streetscape
and signage programs in roadway
improvements that provide each area
a unique identification and enhance
the functionality and beauty of entry
corridors. Ensure that planned roadway
improvements do not conflict with other
policies that encourage pedestrian
activities and circulation.
Level II - Consistent. Development under the TCSP,
when proposed, would be required to adhere to
streetscape and identification programs as defined by
the 2030 General Plan.
CD-7.8 Road Design. Reflect the
residential and commercial activities
of the urban village area by using
appropriate roadway widths for road
and streetscape design.
Level II - Consistent. Development under the Specific
Plan, when proposed, would be required to adhere to
road and streetscape design as defined by the 2030
General Plan.
CD-7.9 Infrastructure Compatibility.
Ensure new development within each
urban village complies with the City’s
adopted infrastructure master plans and
provides fair share contributions towards
existing and future improvements
necessary to serve the development.
Level II - Consistent. As described in Section 4.14,
Utilities and Service Systems, developers of the
proposed project would pay fees for the necessary
wastewater infrastructure, project developers would
design on-site water systems to serve the development,
and the proposed project would not significantly
impact water or solid waste infrastructure.
1063
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.128 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD-7.11 Urban Village Open Space
Areas/Parks. Park sizes and locations
shall follow City standards and be within
walking distance of a majority of the
population.
Level II - Consistent. The TCSP would include 17.8
acres of parks and open space, most of which would
be located east of Patterson Road. The 7.4-acre park
adjacent to Patterson Road would be within walking
distance of all TCSP residents, as well as existing
residential neighborhoods north and east of the project area.
CD-7.12 Urban Village Collocation with
Schools. Promote the collocation of parks
with school facilities for the purpose of
enhancing available open space and
recreation.
Level II - Consistent. The proposed TCSP does not
involve collocation of schools and parks; however, the
7.4-acre City Community Park proposed to be located
alongside Patterson Road would be near the proposed
OSD school site adjacent to the TCSP area.
CD-7.13 Urban Village Trail and Open
Space Connections. Include trails
(pedestrian and bicycle) and open space
areas, where feasible within urban
village areas. These facilities shall create
a network that links urban villages and
other neighborhoods to each other.
Level II - Consistent. The TCSP would include open
space areas, including greenbelts along Beverly Drive
and Street C. The area adjacent to Patterson Road,
nearest to the agricultural uses, would be developed as a 7.4 acre park area, which would be accessible to other neighborhoods.
CD 8.1. Limiting Development. Continue
to limit development to those areas that
can be served by existing or planned
utilities, transportation, and service
systems.
Level II - Consistent. See Section 4.14, Utilities and
Service Systems. The proposed project is at the edge of the existing service area. It would involve development in an area that, with the mitigation proposed, can be
served by existing or planned service systems. Since
service does not exist currently, the project is potentially consistent.
CD 8.2. Services. Continue to ensure
that public services and facilities are
in place at the time of need or prior to
the time new development occurs in
order to avoid overloading existing
urban service systems.
1064
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.129 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy
CD 8.5. Impact Mitigation. Ensure that
new development avoids or mitigates
impacts on air quality, traffic congestion,
noise, and environmental resources to the
maximum extent feasible.
Level I - Consistent. See Section 4.3, Air Quality for
mitigation measures including energy efficiency design
elements and construction requirements that would
reduce impacts to air quality to a less than significant level. See Section 4.10, Noise, which includes
mitigation measures and concludes that impacts
related to noise would be less than significant. See
Section 4.13, Transportation and Traffic for mitigation measures related to intersections that would ensure
that impacts related to traffic would be less than
significant. Other mitigation measures and impacts
to environmental resources are discussed throughout
this EIR and impacts would be reduced to the extent
feasible.
CD 8.7. Community Balance. Create
an appropriate balance between
urban development and preservation
of agricultural uses by promoting
development within the CURB while
designating land outside the CURB as
Resource Protection, Open Space or
Agricultural land use, unless otherwise
allowed through a CURB amendment
and/or exemptions from the SOAR
ordinance.
Level II - Consistent. When voters approved the city’s
Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (“SOAR”)
initiative in 1998, the Teal Club site was specifically located inside the urban growth boundary (“CURB”)
(Specific Plan, July 2013).
CD 8.8. Public Facility Service Areas.
Provide appropriate service areas for
existing and planned public facilities
such as a museum, secondary and
elementary schools, fire stations, branch
libraries, community centers, parks, and
infrastructure utility for support facilities.
Level I - Consistent. Within the residential and
commercial Planning Areas are a 6.5-acre community
park, a 3.5-acre community park, and a 0.4-acre
greenbelt combine for a total of 10.4 park acres. A 7.4- acre City Community Park would also be included in
the TCSP to the east of Patterson Road. Public access to the Community Park would be available to all Oxnard
residents via Patterson Road. In addition, the property at 1618 Doris Avenue in the TCSP area, which is also
within ¼-mile of the proposed Oxnard School District
school site
1065
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.130 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD 8.9. Jobs/Housing Balance &
Sustainable Communities Strategy (SB
375). Incorporate inter- and intra-city
jobs/housing balance in the development
of the regional and subregional
Sustainable Communities Strategy
(SB 375), Urban Village strategy and
strategic plans, with the main intent to
reduce single-occupancy work-related
vehicular trips.
Level I - Consistent. The TCSP would create 2,651
employment opportunities and 988 residential units
within a transit-oriented development community.
This would potentially reduce single-occupancy work-
related vehicular trips by locating employment centers
near residences.
CD 8.10. Timing of Large-Scale
Development. Consider at an early
stage the infrastructure investment
needs of largescale developments in
order to evaluate these needs as part of
long-range water supply, conveyance,
wastewater, and other relevant planning.
Level II - Consistent. As described in Section 4.14,
Utilities and Service Systems, existing water supply and solid waste conveyance systems would be able to serve
the proposed project. Wastewater conveyance systems
and an on-site Advanced Water Purification water
system would be developed prior to occupancy.
CD 9.4. View Corridor. Preservation.
Ensure all public and private investments
positively contribute to the overall
character of the City by minimizing
impacts on important view corridors by
creating edge treatments along greenbelt
areas and a landscaped buffer corridor
of at least 30 feet along designated scenic
corridors and other major transportation
corridors.
Level II - Consistent. Given the limited extent to which the proposed project would affect scenic vistas (see
Section 4.1, Aesthetics), the project would not have a
significant adverse impact on scenic vistas.
CD 9.5. Unique Character Preservation.
Ensure that new public and private
investment maintains the unique coastal
and agricultural character of the City.
Level II - Consistent. As discussed in Section 4.2,
Agricultural Resources, there was a significant and
unmitigable impact associated with the conversion of
agricultural land in the 2030 General Plan.
CD 10.1. Human-Scale Development.
In the evaluation of development
proposals, require urban development
on a human scale, by emphasizing
the pedestrian experience over the
movement and storage of vehicles.
Level II - Consistent. The TCSP would provide for
the pedestrian experience. Medium and Medium-
High Density residential areas would orient
to internal pathways and common areas with
connection to the public walking network and to
the urban village component.
1066
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.131 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CD 10.2. Neighborhood Themes.
In the evaluation of development
proposals, require neighborhood
themes and principles of design, such
as neotraditional town planning, which
include central parks, schools, and
community and commercial facilities,
strong pedestrian orientation and de-
emphasis of automobile related elements
in new development projects.
Level II - Consistent. The TCSP would emphasize the
neighborhood themes. Medium and Medium-High
Density areas would orient to internal pathways and
common areas with connection to the public walking
network and to the urban village. Small parks or
“greenbelts” would be located along major roadways
within the TCSP area, including on Beverly Drive and
Street C. The TCSP also includes a Community park.
CD 11.3. Protect and Enhance Cultural
Resources. Ensure that new public and
private investment protects and enhances
Oxnard’s existing cultural resources,
traditional neighborhoods, and historic
districts, to the extent feasible.
Level II - Consistent. See Section 6.0, Effects Found
Not to be Significant. There are no officially designated historic resources or known cultural resources on or
adjacent to the project area.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
ICS 1.2. Development Impacts to Existing
Infrastructure. Review development
proposals for their impacts on
infrastructure (e.g., sewer, water, fire
stations, libraries, streets) and require
appropriate mitigation measures to
ensure that proposed developments do
not create substantial adverse impacts
on existing infrastructure and that the
necessary infrastructure will be in place
to support the development.
Level II - Consistent. The proposed project includes
payment of wastewater infrastructure fees to ensure
that infrastructure would be in place to support
development. The project also includes development
of on-site water systems. The project area is on the
edge of the existing service area for utilities and water and sewer lines are located near the project area. The
applicant would also be required to fund development
of an additional fire station, fire engine, and staff to provide fire/emergency services to the project area
(Mitigation Measure PS-1). See Section 4.12, Public
Services and Section 4.14, Utilities and Service Systems for a discussion of existing and proposed infrastructure. 1067
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.132 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
CIRCULATION
ICS 2.5. Mitigate Impacts on County
Roads. Require new development to
contribute to the enhancement of Ventura
County-maintained roads based on an
updated City/ County Memorandum of
Understanding.
Level II - Consistent. Intersection improvements
and payment of standard traffic impact fees would
be required as described in detail in Section 4.13,
Transportation and Traffic.
ICS 3.3. New Development Level of
Service C. Determine as part of the
development review and approval
process that intersections associated with
new development operate at a level of
service of “C” or better. The City Council
may allow an exception to level of service
“D” in order to avoid impacting private
homes and/or businesses, avoid adverse
environmental impacts, or preserve or
enhance aesthetic integrity.
Level II - Consistent. The proposed project would
include improvements to ensure that the project does
not result in a level of service lower than “C.” See
Section 4.13, Transportation and Traffic and mitigation measures T-1(a-h) and T-2(a-h) for specific details
regarding the affected roadways and intersections.
ICS 6.1. Transit Facilities for New
Developments. Include transit facilities
such as bus benches, shelters, pads or
turnouts, where appropriate, in new
development improvement plans.
Level I - Consistent. Enhanced bus facilities on Ventura Road are included in the proposed plan. This would
include multiple bus pull-out locations and bus shelters on southbound and northbound lanes of Ventura Road,
which would be built as part of the project. The planned bus stops would serve the project area and would help
provide public transit options.
ICS 7.3. Travel Patterns. Promote
compact, mixed use development
patterns that compliment and
encourage TDM programs, pedestrian
and bicycle travel, and transit use.
Level II - Consistent. A business/research park on
the south side of the TCSP area would provide jobs
within walking distance of area residents and the
urban village would be oriented around a public
plaza, and be within walking distance of residential
units, as well as readily accessible to a new bus stop
on Ventura Road. Fees would be paid to a TDM
program, as described in Section 4.3, Air Quality
Mitigation Measure AQ-2(a). The proposed density
would be relatively compact for airport-adjacent
areas.
1068
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.133 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
ICS 8.4. New Development Requires
Bicycle Improvements. Where designated,
require proposed developments to include
bicycle paths and / or lanes in their plan
and to clearly indicate possible bicycling
hazards such as speed bumps and storm
drain inlet grates in parking lots.
Level I - Consistent. When submitted to the City, bike
path design and alignment would be reviewed for
appropriate safety elements. (See Figure 2-4 in Section
2.0, Project Description, for proposed pedestrian,
bicycle, and transit improvements).
ICS 10.2. Oxnard Airport Compatible
Land Use. Continue to ensure that the
land use and zoning adjacent to Oxnard
Airport is compatible in order to minimize
potential noise and safety problems.
Level II - Consistent. Only a small portion along the
southern boundary in the western half of the TCSP
area would be within the 60 dBA CNEL contour.
This portion is proposed for a retention basin and
business park uses, which would be compatible with
potential noise from the Oxnard Airport. The light
manufacturing uses that could be located on the nine
parcels south of the TCSP area would be compatible
with the noise levels associated with the Oxnard
Airport (see Section 4.10, Noise). The proposed TCSP
area and additional Annexation area are both within
the Oxnard Airport’s traffic pattern zone (TPZ) and
are subject to height restrictions. Development of the
Specific Plan would place residential and commercial
uses within 2,000 feet of the Oxnard Airport runway,
potentially exposing people residing and working in
the area to safety hazards. However, the probability of an accident occurring in the Plan Area is low. Further, the presence of nearby emergency landing areas would
reduce accident hazards. Safety would be further
ensured through mitigation measures HAZ-5(a-c).
See Section 4.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials for
further discussion.
1069
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.134 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
ICS 11.6. Water Conservation and/or
Recycling Connection as Mitigation.
Require the use of water conservation
offset measures (efficient low flow fixtures
and irrigation systems, drought tolerant
landscaping, leak detection programs,
water audits, and public awareness
and education programs) and/or
proportional contributions to Advanced
Water Purification water production
and/or conveyance infrastructure related
to the GREAT Program as mitigation for
water supply shortage as determined
by a Water Supply Assessment, CEQA
documentation, or similar analysis as
part of new or master plan development
review.
Level II - Consistent. TCSP buildout is proposed to be
“water neutral” so that future water demand would
not exceed the proposed transfer of water rights. To
provide adequate potable water for the TCSP project,
the existing agricultural water rights within the TCSP
area would be transferred for municipal and industrial
uses to the City of Oxnard. All TCSP development water
needs for which Advanced Water Purification water use
is appropriate would be connected to the City’s Ventura Road Advanced Water Purification water distribution
pipeline. Advanced Water Purification water would be
used, at a minimum, for all landscape irrigation and
other water conservation measures would be required
by mitigation measures UTIL-3(c) and UTIL-3(d). See
Section 4.14, Utilities and Service Systems for further discussion of water conveyance.
ICS 11.7. Water Wise Landscapes.
Promote water conservation in
landscaping for public facilities and
streetscapes, residential, commercial
and industrial facilities and require
new developments to incorporate water
conserving fixtures (low water usage)
and water-efficient plants into new and
replacement landscaping.
Level II - Consistent. Advanced Water Purification
water would be used, at a minimum, for all landscape
irrigation, provided that the Utilities Department
extends the Advanced Water Purification water
facilities an extension of services to the project area is approved. Development within the TCSP area and the
nine Annexed parcels would be required to adhere to
Oxnard City Code (OCC) Chapter 22 Water, Section
22-243 Compliance Requirements, which requires that
the landscape area of projects proposing commercial or
industrial uses shall be designed without the use of turf and with 100% water wise plants. The landscape area of single-family residential, and multi-family residential projects shall be designed with no more than 40% of
the landscaped area in turf or plants that are not water wise plants. Mitigation Measure AQ-2(d) requires
implementation of passive energy conservation design
techniques such as water conserving fixtures; other
water conservation measures would be required by
mitigation measure UTIL-3(c) for exterior water
conservation.
ICS 11.12. Water for Irrigation.
Require the use of non-potable water
supplies for irrigation of landscape
and agriculture, whenever available.
Level II - Consistent. Advanced Water Purification
water would be used, at a minimum, for all
landscape irrigation, provided that the Utilities
Department extends the Advanced Water
Purification water facilities to the project area, as
determined in the Teal Club FEIR.
1070
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.135 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
ICS 13.2. Adequate Storm Drains and
NPDES Discharge Treatment. Provide
storm drainage facilities with sufficient
capacity to protect the public and
property from the appropriate storm
event and strive to meet storm water
quality discharge targets set by NPDES
and related regulations.
Level II - Consistent. The site would generally
drain into new storm drains within Teal Club Road
and Patterson Road, with additional storm water
management provided by the proposed retention and
on-site infiltration areas shown on the Land Use Plan
(Figure 2-3) as “storm water treatment” areas. The
precise configuration of the drainage system would
be determined with the review and approval of each
phase of the Specific Plan. All facilities within the TCSP area would be funded, permitted, and maintained by
a Master Property Association, Community Facilities
District, or other private entity as approved by the City.
Implementation of the TSCP and buildout of the nine
additional parcels would be required to comply with
local, state and federal water quality and discharge
requirements.
ICS 13.3. Stormwater Detention Basins.
Design stormwater detention basins
to ensure public safety, to be either
visually attractive or unobtrusive,
provide temporary or permanent wildlife
habitats, and recreational uses where
feasible in light of safety concerns.
Level II - Consistent. The proposed project would
include underground drainpipes and detention basins.
The detention basins and infiltration areas would be
located along the southern portion of the TCSP area,
adjacent to Teal Club Road and the Business Research
Park. The location would be visually unobtrusive.`
ICS 13.4. Low Impact Development.
Incorporate low impact development
(LID) alternatives for stormwater
quality control into development
requirements. LID alternatives include:
(1) conserving natural areas and
reducing imperviousness, (2) runoff
storage, (3) hydro-modification (to mimic
pre-development runoff volume and flow
rate), and (4) public education.
1071
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.136 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
ER 1.1. Protect Oxnard’s Natural and
Cultural Resources. Protect the City’s
natural resource areas, fish and wildlife
habitat, scenic areas, open space areas,
parks, and cultural and historic resources
from unnecessary encroachment or
harm and if encroachment or harm is
necessary, fully mitigate the impacts to
the maximum extent feasible.
Level II - Consistent. No natural resource areas,
habitat, historic resources, or other natural or cultural resources are located adjacent to the project area;
therefore, no encroachment would occur. Nesting birds
and/or monarch butterflies, as well as irrigation ditches that may be biological resources would be mitigated
to the maximum extent feasible under mitigation
measures as described in Section 4.4, Biological
Resources.
ER 1.2. Protect Surrounding Agriculture
and Open Space. Protect open space and
agricultural uses around Oxnard through
continued adherence to the Guidelines
for Orderly Development, Ventura
County Greenbelt programs, the Save
Open-Space and Agricultural Resources
Ordinance, and other programs or
policies that may subsequently be
adopted such as the SB 375 Sustainable
Communities Strategy.
Level II - Consistent. Implementation of the TCSP and
Annexation of the nine parcels would not encroach
upon agricultural areas to the west of the site. Interim agriculture buffers, as described in Mitigation Measure AG-2, would protect agricultural land on the project
area during and after development of Phase 1 and
before development of Phase 2. See Section 4.2,
Agricultural Resources for a more detailed discussion.
ER 2.3. Promote Areas for Open Space.
Reserve, preserve, and promote areas
particularly suited for open space/
recreational uses. Appropriate public
access to these resources shall be
preserved, enhanced, restored, and
properly controlled.
Level I - Consistent. Within the residential and
commercial PA’s, a 6.5-acre community park, a 3.5-acre
community park, and a 0.4 acre greenbelt combine for
a total of 10.4 park acres. A 7.4-acre City Community
Park would also be included in the TCSP to the east of
Patterson Road. Public access to the Community Park
would be available to all Oxnard residents via Patterson Road.
ER 3.2. Review of Development
Proposals. Review development proposals
in accordance with applicable Federal,
State, and local statutes protecting
special-status species and jurisdictional
wetlands and be open to requiring
greater protection.
Level II - Consistent. As discussed in Section 4.4,
Biological Resources, there are no special-status
species or known jurisdictional wetlands on the project area. Nesting birds and monarch butterflies would be
protected through mitigation measures as described in
Section 4.4, Biological Resources.
ER 3.5. Reduce Construction Silt and
Sediment. Require that construction-
related silt and sediment be minimized
or prohibited to minimize temporary
impacts on biological resources.
Level II - Consistent. As described in Section 4.8,
Hydrology and Water Quality, compliance with NPDES
Construction General Permit and the City of Oxnard
ordinance requiring implementation of a Stormwater
Pollution Control Plan would ensure that impacts on
biological resources would be minimized.
1072
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.137 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
ER 5.5. Abandoned Water Wells and
Transfer of Water Rights. Require
immediate capping of abandoned water
wells at the time of abandonment and
where appropriate and feasible, require
and accept transference of water rights to
the City.
Level II - Consistent. One well currently exists on the project area. The existing agricultural water rights on the site would be transferred to the City as part of the proposed Annexation under applicable rules of the Fox
Canyon Groundwater Management Agency.
ER 5.7. Minimizing Paved Surfaces.
Require minimization and/or
permeability of paved surfaces in new
developments and replacement paving,
where feasible.
Level II - Consistent. The TCSP includes greenbelts and parks throughout the TCSP area, as well as detention
basins located along the southern boundary of the
TCSP area. Impermeable surfaces, including buildings,
surface parking lots, and streets do not exceed
requirements. See Section 4.8, Hydrology and Water
Quality for more details.
ER 6.1. Incorporate Views in New
Development. Preserve important
public views and viewsheds by ensuring
that the scale, bulk and setback of new
development does not significantly
impede or disrupt them and ensure that
important vistas and view corridors
are enhanced. Require development to
provide physical breaks to allow views
into these vistas and view corridors.
Level II - Consistent. As discussed in Section 4.1,
Aesthetics impacts to scenic views would be less than
significant. Many of the views currently available from in and around the project area would continue to be
accessible via internal streets and across the proposed parks and other open areas.
ER 6.6. New Development Private Open
Space. Ensure that new development
incorporates open space areas that
provide community and neighborhood
identity, private quality exterior private
open space for each housing unit, and
minimize conflicting land uses and noise
generators.
Level II - Consistent. The TCSP would include 17.8
acres of parks and open space, including a 7.4-acre
City Community Park. The Community Park would be
located between the TCSP and existing agricultural uses west of Patterson Road, which would minimize land
use conflicts between urban uses and agricultural uses, including those related to air quality and noise.
ER 9.4. Human Scale Development.
Ensure that all new development
emphasizes a human, pedestrian scale
and minimizes its effect on the area’s
sensitive visual resources.
Level II - Consistent. The TCSP would be an “Urban
Village,” emphasizing mixed land uses (single-
and multi-family residential, retail, commercial, a
business research park, and public/semi-public uses),
pedestrian orientation and scale, transit accessibility, and neighborhood identity. As described in Section
4.1, Aesthetics, development within the TCSP would
be subject to the Oxnard Design Review Process
& Guidelines, which include guidelines related to
compatibility with existing development and reducing
effects on sensitive visual resources.
1073
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.138 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
ER 10.1. Promote use of Native and
Water Wise Plants. Promote the
development of a native, drought-tolerant
landscape character throughout the City
that re-enforces a unified and cohesive
landscape character and discourage
plants that are invasive or problematic
in other ways as determined by the City’s
landscape architect.
Level II - Consistent. All development within the TCSP
area and the nine Annexed parcels would be required
to adhere to OCC Chapter 22 Water, Section 22-243
Compliance Requirements, which requires that the
landscape area of projects proposing commercial or
industrial uses shall be designed without the use of turf and with 100% water wise plants. The landscape area
of single-family residential, multi-family residential
projects shall be designed with no more than 40% of
the landscaped area in turf or plants that are not water wise plants.
ER 11.1. Archaeological Resource
Surveys. Continue to require a qualified
archaeologist to perform a cultural
resources study prior to project
approval. Inspection for surface
evidence of archaeological deposits,
and archaeological monitoring during
grading should be required in areas
where significant cultural resources have
been identified or are expected to occur.
Level II - Consistent. Ground disturbance that has
occurred on the project area during past development
and agricultural activities, as well as the lack of
natural surface water features, reduces the likelihood
that intact prehistoric cultural resources are present.
However, mitigation measures CR-1(a) through CR-
1(c) would minimize impacts to cultural resources
by requiring monitoring during grading (all earth
disturbing work within the vicinity of the find would
be temporarily suspended or redirected until an
archaeologist has evaluated) and procedures for
discovery of unearthed cultural resources.ER 11.6. Identification of Archaeological Resources. In the event that
archaeological/paleontological resources
are discovered during site excavation,
continue to require that grading and
construction work on the project site is
suspended until the significance of the
features can be determined by a qualified
archaeologist/paleontologist.
ER 12.5. Soil Conservation and
Transfer. Encourage the conservation of
agricultural soils by requiring, if feasible
and warranted by expert opinion, the
transfer of topsoil from agricultural land
being developed for urban uses.
Level II - Consistent. As described in Section 4.2,
Agricultural Resources, the conversion of agricultural
land and its soils to non-agricultural uses would be a
significant and unmitigable impact. Transfer of soils
would result in potentially significant air quality and noise impacts related to excavation and hauling; in
addition, no especially suited or needed receiver site
has been identified. Buildout of the TCSP would be
primarily at-grade and would not require substantial
hauling of soil for disposal.
1074
Teal Club Specific Plan
date 03.20.2025 Chap ter 9 - General Plan Consistency p.139 Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
ER 12.11. Urban / Agricultural Buffer
Zones. Ensure adequate buffers between
residential and agricultural uses, such as
open space, recreational facilities, utility
easements, windrows, and parking areas.
Adequate fencing should be provided
around agricultural areas to prevent
vandalism.
Level II - Consistent. As described in Section 2.0,
Project Description, the TCSP would include buffer
zones. A 7.4-acre public park would be located east
of Patterson Road between the TCSP and agricultural
uses. Interim buffers, as required by Mitigation
Measure AG-2, would reduce conflicts between
proposed residential uses and existing agricultural uses within the TCSP area.
ER 14.1. Incorporate Ventura County
AQMP Mitigations. Incorporate
construction and operation mitigation
measures recommended or required by
the current Ventura County Air Quality
Management Plan (AQMP) when
preparing CEQA reviews, as appropriate.
Level II - Consistent. As described in Section 4.3, Air Quality, mitigation measures consistent with this policy would be required for development within the TCSP
and nine parcels proposed for Annexation.
ER 14.2. Transportation Demand
Management (TDM). Employ best
traffic management practices such
as bus turnouts and traffic signal
synchronization in order to reduce traffic-
related air emissions impacts; require
commercial developers to improve public
transit service between residential and
employment uses or shopping centers,
bike lanes and protected bicycle parking
areas, and other project features that
would reduce the need for automobile
trips related to the development; and
require Transportation Management
Associations (TMA) for projects that may
have adverse air quality impacts related
to mobile sources and contributions to off-
site TDM funds to reduce residual impacts
that cannot be mitigated on a project-
specific basis.
Level II - Consistent. The transit oriented development of the Urban Village would reduce air quality impacts
by creating a community that would be accessed
by pedestrians and would be in close proximity to
alternative modes of transportation, such as buses.
Enhanced bus facilities on Ventura Road are included
in the proposed plan. This would include multiple bus
pull-out locations and bus shelters on southbound
and northbound lanes of Ventura Road, which would
be built as part of the project. The planned bus stops
would serve the project area and would help provide
public transit options. See Section 4.3, Air Quality for Mitigation Measure AQ-2(a) which requires payment of
fees to a TDM, as well as Section 4.13, Transportation
and Traffic, which includes mitigation measures to
improve intersection and roadway operations, reducing
traffic and, therefore, emissions, at intersections.
ER 14.3. Reducing Carbon Monoxide
Exposure at Congested Intersections.
Require mitigation measures that
consider prohibiting the construction of
residences or buildings lacking ventilation
systems at congested intersections
with the potential for excessive Carbon
Monoxide “hot spot” exposure to sensitive
receptors.
Level II - Consistent. See Section 4.3, Air Quality for discussion of Carbon Monoxide “hot spot” risks. It was
determined that future traffic combined with project
traffic would not cause an exceedance of either the state or federal CO standards in 2020 or 2025 and project-
related CO impacts would be less than significant.
1075
Teal Club Specific Plan
p.140 General Plan Consistency
Teal Club Specific Plan
Table 9-1
2030 General Plan Policy Consistency
General Plan Policy Discussion
ER 14.4. Emission Control Devices.