Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Oxnard City Council
January 6, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
January 6, 2026
Body
Oxnard City Council
Pages
41
Original file
235.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oxnardca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

Figure 3. Observed corridor of Gonzales Road
• Gonzales Road & Northwest school entrance
- The northwest school entrance was closed during the dismissal period. Opening this may relieve some of the traffic congestion.
- There is no crosswalk along the entrance/exit. It is recommended to stripe a high-visibility crosswalk here and upgrade curb ramps with tactile dome pads. • Gonzales Road & Merion Way
- The crosswalks on the north, west and south legs are striped standard. It is recommended to stripe the north, west and south legs with high-visibility crosswalks and upgrade all corners with tactile dome pads.
- The pedestrian signal felt too short to allow for many students to cross Gonzales Road, which measures approximately 100 feet. It is recommended to reevaluate the pedestrian signal timing and consider increasing the time.
• Gonzales Road & Campus Road
- The crosswalks on the east and south legs are striped standard. It is recommended to stripe the east and south legs with high-visibility crosswalks and upgrade all corners with tactile dome pads.
- The curb radius on the southwest and southeast corners were large. It is recommended to tighten the curb radius to slow vehicle turn speed and improve pedestrian safety. 685
300 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
• Gonzales Road between the Northwest school entrance & Campus Road - As stated previously, parents/guardians park along Gonzales Road in the bike lane during the dismissal period and this is permissible according to Principal Urias. It is recommended to enhance this configuration by striping a red curb between the northwest and north central school entrance and Merion Way & Campus Road, and install signage that indicates there is no parking except for during school drop-off/pick-up.
- To provide a safe, continued path for cyclists during the dismissal period, it is recommended to consider shifting the bike lane location on top of the sidewalk, closer to the school where there are currently tree wells, to create a multi-use path. • Gonzales Road between Victoria Road & Patterson Road
- Many students were observed using the south side sidewalk on Gonzales Drive. It is recommended to widen the sidewalk here and install sidewalk lighting (Figure 4, Figure 5).

Figure 4. Students walking on Gonzales Road
sidewalk toward Victoria Avenue
Figure 5. Students walking on Gonzales Road
sidewalk toward Victoria Avenue
686
301 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.4 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
School dismissal was observed as Principal Uris shared the dismissal is generally more congested and challenging than the arrival period. The team observed dismissal at the school site and the adjacent streets.
• The school entrance has three entrance areas, one facing north towards Gonzales Road, another facing east towards Campus Road, and the last facing south towards the school’s sports facilities (Figure 6).
• During the dismissal period parents/guardians will park along the eastbound bike lane on Gonzales Road as they wait for their students. Parents/guardians were previously ticketed for parking in the bike lane during the dismissal period, but Principal Urias has formally enabled parents/guardians to do so to improve traffic flow. A consequence of this arrangement is that the eastbound bike lane is blocked during the dismissal period (Figure 7).

Figure 6. Northern school entrance Figure 7. Eastbound vehicles in traffic and in the bike lane on Gonzales Road
• Parents/guardians will also enter the school premises at three locations to pick up their students. The first is at the Gonzales Road & Merion Way intersection, the second is in the middle of Campus Road (Campus Road midblock entrance/exit), and the third is further down Campus Road (Campus Road south entrance/exit). All lanes within the northern and eastern parking lots are one-way, which helps move the traffic along, though the southern parking lot has two-way travel lanes.
• It was observed that Campus Road has two southbound lanes between Gonzales Road and the first Campus Road south entrance/exit, which allowed traffic entering the school premises to flow relatively smoothly; in contrast, Campus Road has two northbound lanes between the midblock entrance/exit and the south entrance/exit, but the northbound lanes are reduced to 687
302 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
one lane between the middle and south entrance/exit. A consequence of this configuration was congestion in the northbound lane which is stalled by a stop sign at the middle entrance/ exit and the traffic signal at Gonzales Road.
• It was observed that students who walk home do not always follow the sidewalk and crosswalk infrastructure, and will instead walk through the parking lot. • There is a bus loading zone along the east side entrance of the school. Departing buses get caught in the northbound congestion along Campus Road as they exit. 688
303 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Oxnard Middle College High School (9-12)
Prepared By:

City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Technical Appendix
689
304 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

1. Collision and Citation Trends
This section summarizes the collision analysis and citation analysis within a quarter mile of the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activity is concentrated as students approach or depart the school campus. Collision data from 2016 through 2020 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department and validated against the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Citation data from 2016 through 2022 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department.

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were spread across the study area and concentrated along Rose Avenue and Pleasant Valley Road. Collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age were prevalent along Bard Road, Pleasant Valley Road, and Rose Avenue. There were two fatality collisions within the quarter mile study area.
690
305 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Pedestrian collisions were spread across the study area and clustered along Rose Avenue and Bard Road. Bike collisions concentrated at the intersection of Gary Drive and Rose Avenue. 691
306 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Putting all the information together, several collisions involving someone under the age of 16 were a pedestrian or bicycle collision resulting in a severe injury or fatality. There were two fatality collisions within the study area and both collisions involved someone walking or biking. 692
307 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 114 injury collisions between 2016-2020 within a quarter mile radius of Oxnard Middle College High School. 10 (9%) collisions involved someone killed or severely injured (KSI)—2 fatal and 8 severe injury. Both fatal collisions involved someone walking or biking. 28 collisions (25%) within a quarter mile radius of the school involved someone under the age of 16. Most of these occurred along Rose Avenue, Bard Road, and Pleasant Valley Road. No roadways directly border the school’s campus, as it is located on the Oxnard Community College Campus. The roadways bordering Oxnard Community College are Rose Avenue to the west, Bard Road to the south, and Olds Road to the east.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Vehicle Right of Way Violations (39%), which mostly involved drivers not yielding before making a left turn, and Unsafe Speed (17%). Vehicle Right of Way Violation collisions mostly occurred along Rose Avenue and Pleasant Valley Road. Unsafe Speed collisions similarly occurred along Rose Avenue and Pleasant Valley Road, with a smaller hotspot along Bard Road. 60% of the collisions involving a pedestrian occurred due to a driver not yielding to the pedestrian in the crosswalk. Two of these occurred at the intersection of Olds Road & E Pleasant Valley Road and two occurred at the intersection of Anchorage Street & E Bard Road. 693
308 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Oxnard Middle College High School (2016 – 2020) Total Injury Collisions 114
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions
10 (9%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old
28 (25%) (KSI: 5)
Pedestrian-Involved 10 (9%) (KSI: 1)
Bicycle-Involved 8 (7%) (KSI: 1)
Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Right of Way Violation 44 39%
Unsafe Speed 19 17%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 58 51%
Rear End 19 17%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 18 16%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 27 24%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 43 38%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 23 20%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 1 1%
Dark – Streetlights 28 25%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 1 1%
Daylight 78 68%
Dusk/Dawn 5 4%
Roadway Classification
Count Percent of Total
Primary 3 3%
Secondary 101 89%
Minor 10 9%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 4 4%
No 110 96%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
694
309 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Rose Avenue 50
Nearly half of the collisions
occurred on Rose Avenue, mostly at
the intersections of Gary Drive,
Lindsay Place, and Bard Road. All
three intersections are adjacent to
the Oxnard Community College
campus. Two-thirds of collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

Rose Avenue & Gary Drive 6 Vehicle Right of Way Violation (4) The slight curvature of Rose Avenue
south of the intersection combined
with vegetation on the southwest
corner may limit visibility for
eastbound traffic.

The east leg of the intersection
serves as a connector to school
parking lots and has two departure
and two receiving lanes. The multilane approach may cause confusion.

There were two bicycle collisions at
this intersection, both broadsides.

One involved a bicyclist travelling
on the wrong side of the road and
running into a stopped car.

The other involved a northbound
driver colliding with a westbound
bicyclist.

There are Class II bicycle lanes on
both sides of Rose Avenue, however
a posted speed of 45 mph and
multiple lanes of travel may create
an uncomfortable environment for
bicyclists.

Rose Avenue & Lindsay Place 6 Turning (2)
Unsafe Speed (2)
There was one overturned collision
and one hit object collision,
potentially indicating a need for
improved visibility of conflict points
at the intersection.

Rose Avenue & Bard Road 30 Drivers Not Yielding (20)
There was one collision which
resulted in a fatality and three
collisions resulted in a severe injury.
695
310 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Pleasant Valley Road 28
Vehicle Right of Way Violation
(12)
Unsafe Speed (7)
Traffic Signs & Signals (4)
One collision resulted in a fatality
east of the Syracuse Drive
intersection. The collision was a hitand-run, and the cause of collision was not reported.

There were 5 collisions at the
Beaumont Avenue intersection, all
resulting from Unsafe Speed or
Vehicle Right of Way Violations.

One of the Vehicle Right of Way
Violations resulted in a severe
injury—an eastbound vehicle failed
to yield to another vehicle making a
U-turn.

Bard Road 5
One collision at the Entrance Road
intersection resulted in a severe
injury. A westbound driver was
driving under the influence and
struck a fixed object, severely
injuring one of the passengers who
was under the age of 16.

One block east at the Simpson
Drive intersection, a speeding
vehicle rear ended another vehicle,
resulting in a severe injury.
696
311 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign 186 78%
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard 22 9%
Speeding 18 8%
Improper Turning 4 2%
Running Red Light 4 2%
Pedestrian Right of Way Violation 3 1%

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
697
312 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2016-2020 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Maricruz Hernandez, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route.

The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• Students live in a wide range of geographies, given that students apply for enrollment. A majority of students get driven to school, while the remainder use public transit or drive themselves. One student was reported to use an electric scooter.
• Key locations include: Lot H pick-up zone, Lot G drop-off zone, midblock crossing at N. Campus Road and northbound Rose Avenue.
• Key issues include drop-offs in unauthorized areas (e.g. N. Campus Road which serves a primary route to Lot G).
698
313 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2022
- Start time: 3:15 PM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and slight winds
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Debbie O’Leary – City of Oxnard

2. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

3. Tom Reilly – LSY Enterprise

4. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

5. Rachel Om – Fehr & Peers

6. Alex Sarno – Fehr & Peers
Figure 1. Walk audit route
699
314 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Rose Avenue
Figure 2. Observed corridor of Rose Avenue
• Rose Avenue & Bard Road
- Standard crosswalks were observed on all legs of the intersection and would benefit from upgrading to high visibility striping (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Rose Avenue & Bard Road standard crosswalks
700
315 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
• Rose Avenue between Bard Road & Channel Islands Boulevard - The east side of Rose Avenue has a limited number of driveways, which could be an opportunity to study the feasibility of upgrading the existing northbound bike lane to a parking-protected bike lane.

East-West Streets
North Campus Road
Figure 4. Observed corridor of North Campus Road
• North Campus Road between Rose Avenue & Simpson Drive - Minimal vehicular activity was observed on North Campus Road. All cars on North Campus Road were observed traveling at slow speeds and yielding to pedestrians at the crosswalk (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Vehicle waiting for pedestrians to cross the crosswalk 701
316 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
South Campus Road
Figure 6. Observed corridor of South Campus Road
• South Campus Road between Entrance Road & Simpson Drive - Two pedestrian crossing signs with flashing lights are located along South Campus Road near the liberal arts school. The signs were flashing without any activation (Figure 7). - The nearest north-south crosswalk is at Entrance Road. Pedestrians were observed crossing along South Campus Road to Parking Lot A.

Figure 7. One of two RRFB type devices on South Campus Road 702
317 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

East-West Streets
Bard Road
Figure 8. Observed corridor of Bard Road
• Bard Road & Simpson Drive
- The four-way stop controlled intersection has multi-lane approaches on Bard Road, which may cause confusion for drivers on right-of-way and may pose as a safety concern for pedestrians as their visibility is limited if multiple vehicles are stopped in the eastbound and westbound directions. The high visibility crosswalks, which were recently added as part of a resurfacing project, help highlight pedestrian activity (Figure 9). Installing in-road warnings of the school’s presence could further enhance pedestrian safety by increasing driver awareness of increased pedestrian activity.

Figure 9. Bard Road & Simpson Drive
703
318 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Figure 10. Eastbound bike lane on Bard Road between Simpson Drive & Pleasant Valley Road - Red curb markings were observed along Bard Road to the west of the driveway for the housing development located between Simpson Drive & Pleasant Valley Road. The red curb markings served to improve visibility for drivers exiting the housing development. • Bard Road & Pleasant Valley Road
- The westbound bike lane striping ends approximately 85 feet before the intersection and lacks conflict striping. During the walk audit a cyclist was observed mounting the sidewalk, which was narrow, on Pleasant Valley Road between Olds Road & Pleasant Valley Road and Bard Road & Pleasant Valley Road. The cyclist continued westward along Bard Avenue in the bike lane.
- The pedestrian crossing button on the southeast corner of the intersection is located approximately 60 feet away from the south leg of the intersection to cross the driveway. - Automobiles using the westbound left turn must traverse approximately 58 feet before they are able to turn which may create difficulty for drivers. • Bard Road between Simpson Drive & Pleasant Valley Road - Multiple automobiles were observed parking in the eastbound bike lane during prohibited hours of 8 AM to 8 PM (Figure 10).
704
319 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Pleasant Valley Road
Figure 11. Observed corridor of Pleasant Valley Road
• Pleasant Valley Road & Olds Road
- The sidewalk on the northwest corner of the intersection does not continue north of the intersection.
- The westbound approach does not have a protected left turn phase. Installing a left turn signal may assist vehicles turning at this large intersection which measures 130 feet diagonally (Figure 12).

Figure 12. Westbound bike lane on Pleasant Valley Road approaching Bard Road intersection 705
320 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
School dismissal was observed as Principal Hernandez shared that although each grade has a different schedule, the dismissal period has a higher concentration of students compared to the arrival period. The team observed dismissal at the crosswalk to Parking Lot H and the intersection of Campus Road & Rose Avenue.
• The school entrance exit is located along North Campus Road between Rose Avenue & Simpson Drive.
• During the dismissal period, most students were observed using the crosswalk with flashing beacons, which connects the school entrance to Parking Lot H (Figure 13). • Many students pushed the button to activate the flashing beacons even when cars were not present.
• The majority of students were observed being picked up or getting in their own car in Parking Lot H. A smaller share of students walked along Campus Road to Rose Avenue or south through the Oxnard College campus.

Figure 13. RRFB and crosswalk on North Campus Road
706
321 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Prepared By:

Pacifica High School (9-12)
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Technical Appendix
707
322 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

1. Collision and Citation Trends
This section summarizes the collision analysis and citation analysis within a quarter mile of the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activity is concentrated as students approach or depart the school campus. Collision data from 2016 through 2020 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department and validated against the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Citation data from 2016 through 2022 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department.

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were spread in the west portion of the quarter mile buffer area and notably clustered on Oxnard Boulevard, Glenwood Drive, and Gonzales Road. Collisions with severe injuries or fatalities occur concentrating along Oxnard Boulevard and Gonzales Road as well. 708
323 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Pedestrian collisions present throughout the study area, with concentrations along Oxnard Boulevard, Gonzales Road, and Morado Place. Bicycle collisions present along Oxnard Boulevard, Gonzales Road, and Glenwood Drive.
709
324 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Putting all the information together, there were five collisions resulted in a severe injury or fatality, two of which involved a pedestrian or a cyclist. The one fatality collision occurred at the intersection of Gonzales Road and Oxnard Boulevard.
710
325 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 175 injury collisions between 2016-2020 within a quarter mile radius of Pacifica High School. Five collisions (3%) resulted in a severe injury or fatality, two of which involved a pedestrian or a cyclist. Two of these KSI collisions occurred at the intersection of Gonzales Road & Oxnard Boulevard. The other three occurred within one block of the intersection, one each in the north, east, and west directions. 45 collisions (26%) within a quarter mile radius of the school involved someone under the age of 16. Most of these occurred on Gonzales Road west of Oxnard Boulevard.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Unsafe Speeds (29%), Traffic Signals and Signs (16%) and Vehicle Right of Way Violation (10%). Unsafe Speed and Traffic Signals and Signs violations occurred primarily along Gonzales Road, with particular clustering at the intersections of Oxnard Boulevard, Entrada Drive, and C Street. Along Entrada Drive (the roadway that provides access to the campus) where it is adjacent to the school, there were 4 collisions involving Unsafe Speeds. 711
326 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Pacifica High School (2016 – 2020) Total Injury Collisions 175
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions
5 (3%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old
45 (26%) (KSI: 2 – 40% of all KSI collisions)
Pedestrian-Involved 19 (11%) (KSI: 1 – 20% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 18 (10%) (KSI: 1 – 20% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Unsafe Speed 51 29%
Traffic Signals and Signs 28 16%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Rear End 65 37%
Broadside 47 27%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 29 17%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 47 27%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 56 32%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 39 22%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 1 1%
Dark – Streetlights 44 25%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 1 1%
Daylight 120 69%
Dusk/Dawn 7 4%
Roadway Classification
Count Percent of Total
Primary 143 82%
Secondary 1 1%
Minor 31 18%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 9 5%
No 166 95%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.

Injury Collisions Summary Table
712
327 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Time of Day and Location
Street
(Intersection/Corridor)
Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Gonzales Road &
Oxnard Boulevard 49 Unsafe Speeds (18)
Following Too Closely (6)
This is a major intersection with 5 to 6
lanes in each direction and railroad
tracks running north-south across the
east leg of the intersection. There is a
Class II bicycle lane in the east and west
directions. The majority of collisions
occurred during the evening peak
period (3 – 7 PM). There were 4
pedestrian collisions and 6 bicyclist
collisions, 3 of which were the result of
the bicyclist riding on the wrong side of
the road. Most of the bicyclists were
travelling north at the time of the
collision.

Gonzales Road and
Entrada Drive 17
Unsafe Speed (4)
Traffic Signs and Signals (4)
Following Too Closely (3)
This intersection is the northwest corner
of the school’s boundary, and Entrada
Drive provides access to the interior of
the campus. The majority of collisions
occurred during the day. 3 collisions
involved a bicyclist: one of these
collisions involved a cyclist riding on the
wrong side of the road, and the other
two involved eastbound or westbound
drivers running red lights and striking
northbound or southbound cyclists. One
of these red light collisions involved
someone under the age of 16.

Gonzales Road and C
Street 30 Red Light Running (9)
Unsafe Speeds (6)
Roughly one-third of these collisions
occurred under dark/overnight
conditions. There were nine collisions
that involved someone under the age of
16 and three collisions involved
pedestrians, two of whom were crossing
in the crosswalk at the intersection. Two
collisions involved cyclists, one of which
was sideswiped as a vehicle tried to
pass, and one of which was riding on the
wrong side of the road.

Oxnard Boulevard and
Glenwood Drive 9 Please see the note
There was no dominant primary collision
factor, but 2 collisions involved Red
Light Running and 2 involved Unsafe
Speeds.

Oxnard Boulevard and
Citrus Grove Lane 16 Unsafe Speeds (7)
Red Light Running (4)
3 collisions involved a pedestrian: one
involved a pedestrian crossing in a
crosswalk and a driver not yielding.

Another involved a pedestrian under the
age of 16 suddenly leaving the curb.
713
328 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 298 76%
Running Stop Sign 58 15%
Running Red Light 25 6%
Improper Turning 6 2%
Pedestrian Crossing Outside of Crosswalk 4 1%
Pedestrian Right of Way Violation 2 1%
Biking Wrong Way 1 0%

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
714
329 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2. Walk Audit
• Most students live within the district boundaries and walk to school or are dropped off. A smaller percentage of students (10-15%) bike or skateboard. • Key locations include: the drop-off zone near school gym, nearby intersections and the school parking lot.
• Key issues include: congestion due to overenrollment and late arrivals, dropoffs in unauthorized areas wherever space is available, conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles at intersections and within parking lots, and rushed morning drop-offs.

The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2016-2020 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Chris Ramirez, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
715
330 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Thursday, May 11, 2023
- Start time: 8:10 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

2. Tom Reilly – LSY Enterprise

3. Rachel Om – Fehr & Peers

4. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

5. Assistant Principal Alison Holicky (Arrival observation)

6. Principal Chris Ramirez (Arrival observation)
Figure 1. Walk audit route
716
331 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Entrada Drive
Figure 2. Observed Corridor of Entrada Drive
• Entrada Drive & Gonzales Road
- Standard crosswalk markings are faded on all three legs of the intersection that have crosswalks (there is no crosswalk on the western leg) (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Students crossing at Entrada Drive & Gonzales Road 717
332 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
- The curb cuts at the northwest and northeast corner of the intersection lack tactile warning pads.
- The signal timing does not allow for all students to cross Gonzales Road before ending the walk signal, leaving students in the crosswalk during the proceeding turning phase. • Entrada Drive south of Gonzales Road
- Drivers in vehicles make illegal southbound U-Turns around the median in the center of Entrada Drive.

East-West Streets
Figure 4. Observed Corridor of Gonzales Road
Gonzales Road
• Gonzales Road between Indiana Drive and Snow Avenue
- The coverage of street trees of the sidewalk on the eastbound leg is spotty, creating situations where there is a lack of shade for pedestrians and other sidewalk users. • Gonzales Road between Oxnard Boulevard and Snow Avenue - The bike lanes along this stretch of Gonzales Road are quite narrow, especially considering the traffic speeds and speed limit of the road. Cars were parked in the bike lane for up to 5 minutes during arrival periods blocking bicycles from access the campus. - Except during 20 minutes surrounding the school arrival period, traffic along Gonzales Road is free-flowing and moves at high speeds. The speed limit along Gonzales in this section 718
333 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
is 45 miles per hour and real time speed signs at Snow Avenue show traffic moving in the 40 to 45 mile per hour range. This traffic generates a significant amount of road noise. • Gonzales Road and Snow Avenue
- Crosswalk striping is worn out at this location (Figure 5, 6). • Gonzales Road and Indiana Drive
- While the southbound direction of Indiana Drive meeting Gonzales Road only permits a right turn, there are no pavement markings indicating that. The presence of a left turn pocket from Gonzales onto Indiana may confuse drivers.
- The curb cuts lack truncated domes/tactile warning pads. • Gonzales Road between Oxnard Boulevard and Entrada Drive - The sidewalk on the south (eastbound) side of Gonzales Road lacks street trees or any other vegetation despite a strip of dirt between the sidewalk and road. This leaves pedestrians and sidewalk users exposed to fast-moving vehicular traffic.

Figure 5. Faded crosswalk striping Figure 6. Narrow, worn bicycle facilities 719
334 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Figure 7. Observed Corridor of Oxnard Boulevard

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Oxnard Boulevard
- There are no sidewalks on the eastern side of Oxnard Boulevard. • Oxnard Boulevard & Gonzales Road
- The sidewalk along Gonzales Road is narrow and uneven where crossing the railroad rightof-way parallel to Oxnard Boulevard at this intersection. 720
335 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
School arrival was observed as Chris Ramirez shared the arrival is generally more congested and challenging than the dismissal period. The team observed arrival along Gonzales Road, Entrada Drive, and Martin Luther King Jr Drive to cover the school entrances along Gonzales Road and Martin Luther King Jr Drive and parking lot access along Entrada Drive.

Martin Luther King Jr Drive & Juanita Avenue:
- Students can enter campus by walking through a gate on the north leg of Martin Luther King Jr Drive and Juanita Avenue. This gate is staffed by a campus supervisor, Arnold, and is only open during the arrival and dismissal period. Arnold shared that approximately 400 students enter through this gate in the morning and approximately 1,000 students leave through the gate in the afternoon.
- In general, the congestion was minimal at this intersection during the arrival period. Arnold shared that the afternoon is significantly more congested since more students are walking and cars are waiting to pick up students.
- The majority of the vehicle drop offs occurred at the intersection, which is stop-controlled, with queuing in all directions. Most students got out of the car while the driver was waiting in the queue for the stop sign, but there was plenty of on-street parking along Martin Luther King Jr Drive and along Juanita Avenue where drivers could have pulled over to drop off safely. - The majority of students who were walking to school were walking north on Juanita Avenue with a smaller number of students walking eastbound and westbound on Martin Luther King Jr Drive.
- The number of students crossing the intersection peaked between 8:20 – 8:30 AM (school starts at 8:30 AM).
- The intersection does not have stop bars, but drivers generally waited behind the crosswalk when students were crossing. A small number of drivers waited in the intersection when pedestrians were crossing (e.g. A westbound vehicle on Martin Luther King Jr Drive crossed the stop sign and then waited in front of the crosswalk across the west leg instead of yielding to pedestrians from the stop sign).
- Visibility was generally not an issue at the intersection, but several vehicles pulled over to drop off a student on the southeast corner of the intersection along Martin Luther King Jr Drive, which limited visibility for vehicles on Juanita Avenue trying to turn right onto Martin Luther King Jr Drive.
- Several drivers made mid block U-turns or used residential driveways to make a U-turn along Juanita Avenue after dropping off a student.

Gonzales Road:
- Eastbound vehicles were queued west of Entrada Drive as vehicles were waiting to turn into campus. There were no student drop offs observed in the bike lane along Gonzales Road 721
336 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
west of Entrada Drive.
- Students were walking eastbound on the south side of Gonzales Road from Oxnard Boulevard. The existing sidewalk is bordered by an open field and the roadway. Although the sidewalk is in good condition, the exposure felt high as there is no horizontal separation between the sidewalk and roadway (e.g. A landscaped parkway or trees). - The City team shared that video detection had been installed and signal timing had been optimized at intersections along Gonzales Road within the last six months, and one of the campus supervisor shared they thought the congestion on Gonzales Road had improved. - The existing Class II bike lane feels exposed given the number of vehicle lanes and speeds.

The bike lane will be upgraded to include a buffer as part of the City’s upcoming resurfacing project along Gonzales Road.
- Gonzales Road & Oxnard Boulevard: During the pre-walk audit call, AP Holicky shared that parents have flagged Gonzales Road & Oxnard Boulevard as a challenge for drop off due to long waiting times. The team observed this intersection during the arrival period, and the congestion seemed typical of a commute period.
- Gonzales Road & Entrada Drive: Student crossing activity was concentrated at Gonzales Road & Entrada Drive, and no students were observed crossing outside of the crosswalk. Given the high level of pedestrian activity, several students were not able to finish crossing Gonzales Road if they did not begin crossing right when the light changed. The Oxnard Complete Streets Safety Assessment includes recommendations to extend pedestrian crossing time to ensure people have enough time to safely cross and/or provide a leading pedestrian interval to give pedestrians a head start. Approximately 100 students were observed getting off either the eastbound or westbound bus at this intersection (Routes 4B and 18E). - Parking lot along Gonzales Road: the west side of the parking lot is reserved for staff, and the east side of the parking lot is reserved for teachers. AP Holicky and Principal Ramirez shared that teachers have encountered challenges accessing the parking lot due to student drop offs on the east side of the lot, which is not permitted. There are typically cones that direct drivers who enter through the driveway east of Entrada Drive to make a right turn but the cones will often get moved by drivers who want to proceed straight or make a left turn into the teachers’ lot. Students are permitted to get dropped off in the staff side of the parking lot because staff arrive before the peak of the student arrival period.

Entrada Drive:
- Multiple vehicles traveling southbound on Entrada Drive made a U-turn where the raised median transitions into a striped median. This caused congestion on southbound Entrada Drive as the vehicles making a U-turn were yielding to the northbound vehicles. 722
337 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
R.J. Frank Academy (6-8)
Prepared By:

City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Technical Appendix
723
338 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

1. Collision and Citation Trends
This section summarizes the collision analysis and citation analysis within a quarter mile of the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activity is concentrated as students approach or depart the school campus. Collision data from 2016 through 2020 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department and validated against the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Citation data from 2016 through 2022 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department.

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Wooley Road, C Street, and J Street within the quarter mile buffer area. There were two severe injury collisions within the study area, and both of them occurred on Colonia Road.
724
339 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
There was one bike collisions within the study area and it occurred at Juanita Avenue and Camino del Sol. Pedestrian collisions concentrated on Colonia Road and Juanita Avenue. 725
340 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Putting all the information together, the two severe injury collisions within the study area both involved someone under the age of 16. The severe injury collision at Bonita Avenue and Colonia Road also involved a pedestrian.
726
341 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 22 injury collisions between 2016-2020 within a quarter mile of R.J. Frank Academy.

Two collisions (9%) resulted in a severe injury, one of which involved a pedestrian. 12 collisions (55%) within a quarter mile radius of the school involved someone under the age of 16. Most of these occurred along Morado Place, directly north of campus, and Colonia Road, one block south of campus.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Unsafe Speed (27%), Vehicle Right of Way Violation (18%), Traffic Signals & Signs (14%), Pedestrian Right of Way Violation (14%), and Driving Under the Influence (14%). The Unsafe Speed violations primarily occurred along Colonia Road and Camino del Sol.

Vehicle Right of Way Violations and Traffic Signals & Signs primarily occurred along Camino del Sol. Pedestrian Right of Way Violations occurred primarily along Colonia Road. All DUI collisions occurred along Colonia Road.
727
342 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of R.J. Frank Academy (2016 – 2020) Total Injury Collisions 22
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions
2 (9%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old
12 (55%) (KSI: 1)
Pedestrian-Involved 6 (27%) (KSI: 1)
Bicycle-Involved 1 (5%) (KSI: 0)
Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Unsafe Speed 6 27%
Vehicle Right of Way Violation 4 18%
Traffic Signals and Signs 3 14%
Pedestrian ROW Violation 3 14%
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence 3 14%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 8 36%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 5 23%
Rear End 4 18%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 8 36%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 3 14%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 2 9%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 9 41%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 6 27%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 16 73%
Dusk/Dawn 0 0%
Roadway Classification
Count Percent of Total
Primary 0 0%
Secondary 16 73%
Minor 6 27%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 3 14%
No 19 86%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.

Injury Collision Summary Table
728
343 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Colonia Road 11
Unsafe Speed (3)
Driving Under the Influence (3)
Vehicle Right of Way Violation
(2) Pedestrian Right of Way
Violation (2)
3 collisions occurred at the Garfield
intersection, which is subject to
relatively high instances of hard
brakes and moderate instances of
harsh accelerations. Two were DUI
rear end collisions, and one was an
Unsafe Speed violation.
3 collisions occurred at the
McKinley Avenue intersection, one
of which resulted in a severe injury.

This intersection is subject to
moderate instances of hard braking
and acceleration, especially on the
east leg. The severe injury collision
was a result of an eastbound driver
speeding and colliding with a fixed
object.

One severe injury collision involving
a pedestrian occurred at the Bonita
Avenue intersection. A northbound
driver was making a U turn and
struck a pedestrian under the age of

16. Camino del Sol 6 Traffic Signs & Signals (2)
Unsafe Speed (2)
There were 3 collisions at the
Juanita Avenue intersection, all of
which were broadside collisions (8
total broadsides within a quarter
mile of campus). Two of the
collisions involved a westbound
vehicle colliding with a northbound
vehicle. The third collision was the
only bicycle-involved collision in the
study area. A northbound bicyclist
was riding on the wrong side of the
road and was struck by an
eastbound vehicle making a right
turn. There are Class II bike lanes
and standard crosswalks on all four
legs of the intersection.

Morado Place 4
The collisions at Entrada Drive and
Juanita Avenue involved
pedestrians. There are no marked
crosswalks at either of these
intersections.
729
344 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.

Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign 57 92%
Pedestrian Right of Way Violation 3 5%
Running Red Light 2 3%
730
345 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2. Walk Audit
• Most students live in the neighborhoods of La Colonia and Rose Park, while approximately 200 students come from other parts of Oxnard. A majority of students either walk or bike to school. Bus services are provided for students with special needs. • Key locations include: Juanita Avenue drop-off zone, Juanita Avenue & Camino del Sol intersection, and Juanita Ave & Liada Way crosswalk (north of the intersection). • Key issues include: uncoordinated school schedules with Brekke, difficulties for parents making a left turn into the drop-off area due to high volumes of students walking to school, parents stopping in the middle of Juanita Avenue to let students out, students crossing outside of sidewalks if dropped off in the street, and a lack of bike parking.

The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2016-2020 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Richard Urias, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
731
346 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022
- Start time: 1:30 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

3. Rachel Om – Fehr & Peers

4. Alex Sarno – Fehr & Peers
Figure 1. Walk audit route
732
347 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Juanita Avenue:
• Juanita Avenue & Morado Place
There were no striped crosswalks at this intersection and the northwest and southwest corners do not align with each other (Figure 3).

Figure 2. Observed corridor of Juanita Avenue
Figure 3. Juanita Avenue & Morado Place (facing northwest) with no marked crosswalk and faded stop bars
733
348 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
• Juanita Avenue & crosswalk north of Mika Way
The crosswalk with curb extension just north of this intersection functioned well, even during the dismissal period traffic. It was noted that the slopes of the curb ramps may not be ADA compliant (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Crosswalk north of Juanita Avenue & Mike Way
East-West Streets
Morado Place:

Figure 5. Observed corridor of Morado Place
• Morado Place between Galean Place & Juanita Avenue:

The bus loading zone on Morado Place did not have red curb paint. 734
349 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

East-West Streets
Morado Place:

Figure 6. Observed corridor of Morado Place
• Morado Place & Entrada Drive:

The curb on the southeast corner allows for quick turns and may benefit from a curb extension to tighten the turn radius (Figure 7).

Figure 7. Southeast corner of Morado Place & Entrada Drive 735
350 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Camino Del Sol:
• Camino Del Sol between Entrada Drive & Juanita Avenue:

There were no trees along this segment of Camino Del Sol where there used to be as late as February 2021. This street segment would benefit from trees in the existing tree wells (Figure 9).

Figure 8. Observed corridor of Camino Del Sol
Figure 9. North side of Camino Del Sol between Entrada Drive & Juanita Avenue 736
351 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
School dismissal observations identified key transportation corridors used to get to and from the school, as well as how parents/guardians and students navigate the dismissal period. • The school entrance is located on Juanita Avenue between Mika Way and Katrina Way. • During the dismissal period, parents/guardians park along Juanita Avenue in both directions.

Students also use the sidewalks on Juanita Avenue in both directions. • Buses were observed at the bus loading zone on the northern perimeter of the school along Morado Place and at the entrance of the school adjacent to Juanita Avenue. • Students from Pacifica High School were observed walking and biking southward on Juanita Avenue. This resulted in a large wave of students moving southbound, which led to vehicle stalling at the Camino Del Sol intersection (Figure 10 and 11).

Figure 10. Southbound traffic on
Juanita Avenue during dismissal
period
Figure 11. Eastbound traffic on Camino Del Sol during dismissal period
737
352 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Ramona Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:

City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Technical Appendix
738
353 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

1. Collision and Citation Trends
This section summarizes the collision analysis and citation analysis within a quarter mile of the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activity is concentrated as students approach or depart the school campus. Collision data from 2016 through 2020 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department and validated against the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Citation data from 2016 through 2022 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department.

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions are fairly spread out within the quarter mile buffer area. There were two fatality collisions and both two were on Cooper Road. The two severe injury collisions within the study area occurred on Colonia Road.
739
354 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Pedestrian collisions are also spread across the study area and concentrated along Cooper Road and Juanita Avenue. There was one bicycle collision and it occurred along East 1st Street. 740
355 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Putting all this information together, all the four fatality or severe injury collisions involved someone under the age of 16. The fatality collision at Cooper Road and Anita Avenue also involved a pedestrian.
741
356 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 60 injury collisions between 2016-2020 within a quarter mile radius of Ramona Elementary School. Two collisions resulted in a severe injury, and two resulted in a fatality. Twenty collisions (33%) within a quarter mile radius of the school involved someone under the age of 16.

Most of these occurred along Colonia Road, Cooper Road, 1st Street, and Juanita Avenue.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Vehicle Right of Way Violation, DUI, and Traffic Signals and Signs.

Most of the Vehicle Right of Way Violations occurred along 3rd street and 1st Street. DUI collisions occurred on Colonia Road, Garfield Avenue, Cooper Road, Juanita Avenue, and 3rd Street. Traffic Signals and Signs collisions occurred on Cooper Road and 1st Street—the roads directly north and south of campus.
742
357 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Ramona Elementary School (2016 – 2020) Total Injury Collisions 60
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 4 (6%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 20 (33%) (KSI: 2 – 50% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 14 (23%) (KSI: 3 – 75% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 2 (3%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Vehicle Right of Way Violation 20 33%
DUI 7 12%
Traffic Signals and Signs 6 10%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 27 45%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 14 23%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 12 20%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 7 12%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 23 38%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 18 30%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 2 3%
Dark – Streetlights 17 28%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 37 62%
Dusk/Dawn 4 7%
Roadway Classification
Count Percent of Total
Primary 0 0%
Secondary 26 43%
Minor 34 57%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 9 15%
No 51 85%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.

Injury Collision Summary Table
743
358 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Colonia Road 13
Driving Under the Influence (3)
Unsafe Speed (3)
Pedestrian Right of Way
Violation (2)
A concentration of these collisions
(3) occurred at the Garfield Avenue
intersection, which experiences
moderate instances of harsh
acceleration and hard braking.

There were two collisions at this
location caused by driving under
the influence.

There were two collisions that
resulted in a severe injury along this
segment. One was a hit object
collision at the McKinley Avenue
intersection caused by Unsafe
Speed. The other was a pedestrianinvolved collision at the Bonita Avenue intersection. A northbound
driver was making a U-Turn and
collided with a pedestrian. The
pedestrian action was not reported,
but there are no marked crosswalks
at the intersection. These collisions
occurred one block apart.

Cooper Road 12
Traffic Signs and Signals (3)
Pedestrian Right of Way
Violation (2)
Unsafe Starting or Backing
Improper Turning (2)
Seven collisions on this segment
involved pedestrians, two of which
resulted in a fatality.

One of the fatal collisions involved a
pedestrian under the age of 16
crossing a crosswalk at the Anita
Avenue intersection. Two other
pedestrians were injured in this
collision. The intersection is a threelegged intersection with a standard crosswalk on the east leg. It is sidestreet stop-controlled on the north leg. The second fatal collision
occurred at the Grant Avenue
intersection. A westbound driver
driving under the influence struck a
northbound pedestrian. The
intersection is side-street stopcontrolled with a crosswalk on the east leg. Two additional pedestrian
collisions occurred at the Grant
Avenue intersection, both involving
westbound vehicles.
1st Street 13 Vehicle Right of Way Violation
(6) Traffic Signals and Signs (3)
There were four collisions at the
Juanita Avenue intersection. Two
involved drivers running stop signs,
and one involved a pedestrian
crossing outside of a crosswalk.
744
359 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign 186 78%
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard 22 9%
Speeding 18 8%
Improper Turning 4 2%
Running Red Light 4 2%
Pedestrian Right of Way Violation 3 1%

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
745
360 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2016-2020 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Allison Cordes, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• Most students live in the surrounding neighborhood. Bus service is provided for a small number of students, while very few students ride a bike to school. • Key locations for arrival and dismissal activity include the Bonita and Cooper exit gates.
• Key issues include: congestion during pick-up, double/triple parking during pick-up along Bonita Avenue and Cooper Road, and a lack of space for bike parking.
746
361 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Thursday, August 18, 2022
- Start time: 11:00 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Debbie O’Leary – City of Oxnard

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

3. Rachel Om – Fehr & Peers

4. Alex Sarno – Fehr & Peers
Figure 1. Walk audit route
747
362 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Juanita Avenue:
• This location is a wide crossing near a park (Figure 3), where the team observed vehicles making two turn maneuvers in one movement as they navigate the off-set intersection. During the walk audit a bus was observed making a wide right turn.

Figure 2. Observed corridor of Juanita Avenue
Figure 3. Juanita Avenue & 1st Street Intersection
748
363 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Bonita Avenue:

Figure 4. Observed corridor of Bonita Avenue
• MNS Engineering, a firm hired to implement Safe Routes to School infrastructure improvements, indicated plans to install school signage on Bonita Avenue for northbound traffic between 1st Street and 2nd Street. It was observed during the walk audit that school signage is already present at this location.
749
364 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Figure 5. Observed corridor of Cooper Road
• Currently, a high visibility crosswalk is planned for the east leg of the Cooper Road & Anita Avenue intersection, paired with a curb extension on each end. One fatal collision occurred at this location, involving a pedestrian under 19 years of age in the early morning hours. • Field observations at the Garfield Avenue & Cooper Road intersection found the curb ramps to be in poor condition (Figure 6).
• There were faded street markings on Cooper Road near Garfield Avenue. The audit team was informed that resurfacing was planned for this area, which will include new markings as well.

Figure 6. Garfield Avenue & Cooper Road Intersection - Curb Ramp and Crosswalk Conditions East-West Streets
Cooper Road:
750
365 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
• Pavement condition was observed to be degraded in this area. • Field observations found that the curb ramps at the 1st Street & Harding Avenue and 1st Street & Wilson Avenue intersections were in poor condition (Figures 8 and 9).

Figure 7. Observed corridor of 1st Street
1st Street:

Figure 8. 1st Street & Harding Avenue - Curb
Ramp and Crosswalk Conditions
Figure 9. 1st Street & Wilson Avenue - Curb
Ramp and Crosswalk Conditions
751
366 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

East-West Streets
Colonia Road:

Figure 10. Observed corridor of Colonia Road
• During the walk audit, the team found it difficult to cross Colonia Road between Garfield Avenue and Juanita Avenue. Traffic was moving at high speeds, and there was an absence of controlled intersections. The collision analysis also revealed there were five collisions involving parties under 16 along this stretch, two of which involved pedestrians (one severely injured). 752
367 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Prepared By:

Ritchen Elementary School (TK-5)
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Technical Appendix
753
368 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

1. Collision and Citation Trends
This section summarizes the collision analysis and citation analysis within a quarter mile of the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activity is concentrated as students approach or depart the school campus. Collision data from 2016 through 2020 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department and validated against the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Citation data from 2016 through 2022 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department.

1.1 Collision Trends
There were three injury collisions within the study area. An additional 128 collisions occurred on Ventura Road and Gonzales Road in the vicinity of campus but outside the quarter-mile radius. 754
369 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
No collisions involved a pedestrian or cyclist.
755
370 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Putting all the information together, no collisions within the study area resulted in a severe injury or fatality, and no collisions involved a pedestrian, a cyclist, or someone under the age of 16. 756
371 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 3 injury collisions between 2016-2020 within a quarter mile radius of Emilie Ritchen Elementary School. No collisions resulted in a severe injury or fatality, and no collisions involved a pedestrian or cyclist. No collisions involved someone under the age of 16.

Action During Collisions
One collision was a broadside that resulted from a driver failing to stop at a stop sign, one was a head-on collision caused by a driver driving on the wrong side of the road, and the other was a hit object collision caused by unsafe speeding that occurred during the evening peak traffic period between 3PM and 7PM.
757
372 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Injury Collisions Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Ritchen Elementary School (2016 – 2020) Total Injury Collisions 3
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions
0 Collisions with victim under 16
years old
0 Pedestrian-Involved 0
Bicycle-Involved 0
Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Vehicle Right of Way Violation 1 33%
Traffic Signals and Signs 1 33%
Unsafe Speed 1 33%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 1 33%
Head-On 1 33%
Hit Object 1 33%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 0 0%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 0 0%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 1 33%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 2 67%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 2 67%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 1 33%
Dusk/Dawn 0 0%
Roadway Classification
Count Percent of Total
Primary 0 0%
Secondary 0 0%
Minor 3 100%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 0 0%
No 3 100%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
758
373 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Oneida Place 2
Oneida Place makes up the
southern boundary of campus, but
the collisions occurred toward the
east end of the roadway and not
directly adjacent to campus. The
collisions both occurred during
overnight hours between 7PM and
6AM.

Coronado Place 1
The third collision occurred on
Coronado Place, one block north of
campus. This was a hit object
collision caused by unsafe speeding
that occurred during the evening
peak traffic period between 3PM
and 7PM.
759
374 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 110 95%
Running Stop Sign 4 3%
Running Red Light 2 2%

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
760
375 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2016-2020 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
As part of the preparations for the walk audit, the SRTS team organized virtual kick-off meetings, inviting key staff members from participating schools. This school either declined the invitations or confirmed their participation after the walk audit had already been conducted. 761
376 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: 11/29/2023
- Meet time: 8:15 AM
- Weather Conditions: Partly cloudy
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
Figure 1. Walk audit route
762
377 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Gallatin Place
Figure 2. Observed Corridor of Gallatin Place
• Gallatin Place & School Driveway
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Gallatin Place & Cabrillo Way
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- The crosswalks were of a school standard variety.
763
378 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
East-West Streets
Cabrillo Way
Figure 3. Observed Corridor of Cabrillo Way
• Cabrillo Way & Evangeline Place
- The curb ramps at the crosswalk lacked tactile warning pads. • Cabrillo Way & School Driveway
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Cabrillo Way & bus loading zone east of driveway
- The bus loading zone was not seen utilizing during the morning arrival period. If it is no longer utilized, it can be restriped as diagonal parking to provide more capacity during arrival and dismissal.
• Cabrillo Way & Coronado Place
- Lots of people were observed crossing here during the arrival period, with no marked crosswalk being present.
• Cabrillo Way & Driveway near Coronado
- The school gate at driveway was locked. The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads. • Cabrillo Way & Astoria Place
- All-way stop controlled and no crosswalks.
- Some curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
764
379 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Joliet Place
Figure 4. Observed Corridor of Joliet Place
• Joliet Place & Cabrillo Way
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- Despite the proximity to the school and the fact that Cabrillo Way is a thru-street, there are no pavement markings indicating the presence of a school. 765
380 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
• Joliet Place & Lions Gate Drive
- Recommendation: Alert to the side-street stop control nature of the intersection by adding “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” signage (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Two-way stop control between two streets with relatively equivalent speeds and volumes may lead to conflicts, especially with on-street parking reducing visibility. Adding “cross traffic does not stop” signage helps alert drivers to who has right-of-way.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Joliet Place & Devonshire Drive
- Currently an uncontrolled intersection with no signage alerting drivers or pedestrians to right of way.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Joliet Place & curve approaching Gallatin Place
- This tight curve in the road limits visibility and is near both a church and community garden (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Curve at Joliet Place lacking SLOW markings
766
381 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Figure 7. Observed Corridor of Gallatin Place
Gallatin Place
• Gallatin Place & Bernadette Street
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- The stop sign on Bernadette appeared to be too small. • Gallatin Place & Gonzales Road
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- The crosswalks were of a school standard variety.
767
382 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Coronado Place
Figure 8. Observed Corridor of Coronado Place
• Coronado Place & Oneida Place
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Coronado Place & Natalie Place
- Currently an uncontrolled intersection with no signage alerting drivers or pedestrians to right of way.
• Coronado Place & Devonshire Drive
- Current signage provides for side-street stop control on Coronado Place. Due to the nature of parked cars along Devonshire and the width/lack of curvature in the road, vehicles may reach higher speeds along Devonshire.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Coronado Place & Lennox Court
- Currently an uncontrolled intersection with no signage alerting drivers or pedestrians to right of way.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Coronado Place & Kensington Lane
- Currently an uncontrolled intersection with no signage alerting drivers or pedestrians to right of way.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads
768
383 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Figure 9. Roadway environment along Doris Avenue at Coronado, which leads directly into a quiet residential neighborhood
• Coronado Place & Ivanhoe Avenue
- A serious collision involving a school-aged pedestrian occurred here shortly before the walk audit was conducted. The lack of curvature and wide width of both Ivanhoe and Coronado increase vehicle speeds, especially for drivers exiting the arterial Doris Avenue (Figure 9). - The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.

East-West Streets
Ivanhoe Avenue
Figure 10. Observed Corridor of Ivanhoe Avenue
769
384 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
• Ivanhoe Avenue west of Coronado Place
- One out of two ramps had curb ramps with tactile warning pads, the other one was not upgraded.
• Ivanhoe Avenue and Daffodill Way
- Similar to Ivanhoe & Coronado, drivers existing Doris may continue higher speeds through the neighborhood, which could lead to potential hazards to other motorists and road users. - The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Ivanhoe Avenue and Oxford Drive
- Similar to Ivanhoe & Coronado, drivers existing Doris may continue higher speeds through the neighborhood, which could lead to potential hazards to other motorists and road users. - The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Ivanhoe Avenue and Waverly Court
- Similar to Ivanhoe & Coronado, drivers existing Doris may continue higher speeds through the neighborhood, which could lead to potential hazards to other motorists and road users. - The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
The team observed at the two access points to the school parking lot. One team member was at the driveway exit at Cabrillo Way while the other was at the entry into the school parking lot off of Gallatin Place.

Cabrillo Way & School Driveway:
- Seven buses were observed passing this location.
- Lots of students and families were seen walking from neighborhood northeast of school. - No crossing guard at driveway or nearby crosswalk at Cabrillo and Evangeline. - The crosswalk at Cabrillo and Evangeline had some pedestrian activity, as well as vehicles exiting the driveway not yielding to traffic.
- A red-curb section marked for buses was not utilized, instead was used for student dropoffs in cars beginning around 8:30am. - Cars were observed parking very close to the crosswalk on Cabrillo, limiting visibility for pedestrians.
- A fairly smooth flow of vehicles exiting was noted from about 8:20am onwards. Bell at 8:40am, last drop-offs trickle out through 8:43.
770
385 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Gallatin Place & School Driveway:
- Eight buses were parked in loading zone along Gallatin. Some were dropping students at Ritchen, while some were collecting students to transport to other schools using Ritchen as a “hub” (Figure 11).

Figure 11. “Bus Hub” at Ritchen
- 8:20am – drop-off lane is already active, steady stream of arrivals. - Drop-off driveway was coned into a single lane outside of the aisle (onto the street). - By 8:33am, the drop-off lane was spilling out onto Gallatin. It remained this way for around two minutes.
- Cones separate a lane for staff/teachers to access parking lot. - First bell at 8:40am. Some driveway activity was observed after the bell. - One parent was observed leaving car with flashers on for about half a minute. 771
386 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Prepared By:

Rose Avenue Elementary School (TK-5)
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Technical Appendix
772
387 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

1. Collision and Citation Trends
This section summarizes the collision analysis and citation analysis within a quarter mile of the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activity is concentrated as students approach or depart the school campus. Collision data from 2016 through 2020 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department and validated against the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Citation data from 2016 through 2022 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department.

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Rose Avenue within the quarter-mile buffer of the school area.

Collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age largely clustered along Rose Avenue as well.

There was a fatal collision occurring midblock along Eastman Avenue between Rose Avenue and Hearst Drive and a severe injury collision occurring at the 3rd Street & Rose Avenue intersection. 773
388 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Pedestrian collisions concentrated along Rose Avenue and San Gorgonio Avenue. Bicycle collisions were prevalent along Rose Avenue as well.
774
389 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Putting all the information together, several collisions involving someone under the age of 16 were a pedestrian or bicycle collision resulting in an injury (severe or otherwise). There was a fatal collision occurring midblock along Eastman Avenue between Rose Avenue and Hearst Drive, which involved someone under the age of 16.
775
390 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 83 injury collisions between 2016-2020 within a quarter mile radius of Rose Avenue Elementary School. Two collisions (2%) involved someone killed or severely injured (KSI). The fatal collision occurred midblock along Eastman Avenue between Rose Avenue and Hearst Drive and was the result of unsafe speeding during morning peak hours. The severe injury occurred at the 3rd Street & Rose Avenue intersection and was due to a driver not stopping at the traffic signal line, which led to a broadside collision. 27 collisions (33%) within a quarter mile radius of the school involved someone under the age of 16. Most of these occurred along Rose Avenue; however, most of the collisions that occurred on secondary streets near the school involved someone under the age of 16, two of which involved pedestrians.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Unsafe Speeds (37%), Improper Turning (12%), Traffic Signals & Signs (11%), and Vehicle Right of Way Violations (8%), all of which mostly occurred along Rose Avenue.

Collisions that occurred outside of Rose Avenue occurred for various reasons and without specific clusters, except for San Gorgonio Avenue. Along San Gorgonio Avenue, both pedestrian collisions occurred as a result of the pedestrian not crossing in a crosswalk. 776
391 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Injury Collisions Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Rose Avenue Elementary School (2016 – 2020) Total Injury Collisions 83
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions
2 (2%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old
27 (33%) (KSI: 1)
Pedestrian-Involved 7 (8%) (KSI: 0)
Bicycle-Involved 11 (13%) (KSI: 1)
Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Unsafe Speeds 31 37%
Improper Turning 10 12%
Traffic Signals and Signs 9 11%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Rear End 41 49%
Broadside 19 23%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 21 25%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 17 20%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 21 25%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 23 28%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 3 4%
Dark – Streetlights 16 19%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 59 71%
Dusk/Dawn 4 5%
Roadway Classification
Count Percent of Total
Primary 2 2%
Secondary 69 83%
Minor 12 14%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 6 7%
No 77 93%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
777
392 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Rose Avenue 61
Approximately 80% of collisions
within a quarter mile of the school
occurred along Rose Avenue.

Unsafe speeding was the leading
cause of collisions, and this
segment of Rose Avenue had
relatively high incidents of harsh
accelerations and hard braking.

Other common violations include
improper turning, traffic signals and
signs, and vehicle right of way
violations.

Rose Avenue and Saint Lucia
Avenue
The intersections of Rose Avenue
and Saint Lucia Avenue and La
Puerta Avenue are key intersections
that lead directly to the school
grounds.

Collisions at the Saint Lucia Avenue
intersection are a representative
subset of collision trends along
Rose Avenue as most collisions
were due to unsafe speeding.

Improper turning was the other
leading cause of collision, and 75
percent of improper turning
collisions involved a northbound
vehicle. The left turn lane into a
plaza for northbound vehicles
occurs prior to the signalized
intersection, which may be a
contributing factor to these
collisions.

Rose Avenue and La Puerta
Avenue 3
There were three collisions at the La
Puerta Avenue intersection, one of
which involved a cyclist. The cyclist
collision was due to biking on the
wrong side of the road during
morning peak hours, which led to a
broadside collision. The other two
collisions were due to improper
turning which led to a sideswipe
and a hit object.
778
393 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Red Light 18 69%
Improper Turning 3 12%
Running Stop Sign 2 8%
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard 1 4%
Pedestrian Crossing Outside of Crosswalk 1 4%

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
779
394 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2016-2020 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
As part of the preparations for the walk audit, the SRTS team organized virtual kick-off meetings, inviting key staff members from participating schools. This school either declined the invitations or confirmed their participation after the walk audit had already been conducted. 780
395 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: 11/27/2023
- Meet time: 1:30 PM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
Figure 1. Walk audit route
781
396 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Driskill Street
Figure 2. Observed Corridor of Driskill Street
• Driskill Street & Haaz Way
- The crosswalk was in good shape and was as ladder-style yellow school crosswalk. - The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Driskill Street & Gaucho Way
- The crosswalk was in good shape and as ladder-style yellow school crosswalk (Figure 3). - The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- Sidewalk uplift was observed on the west side of the street.

Figure 3. Crosswalk and ramps at Driskill and Gaucho
782
397 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
• La Puerta Avenue between Driskill Street and Rose Avenue - A good tree canopy provided shade coverage along this street. Some sidewalk uplift was observed from the vegetation.
• La Puerta Avenue and Vegas Drive
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Driskill Street & Ferrara Way
- No crosswalk at all here.
- Heavy construction due to new school construction.
• Driskill Street between La Puerta Avenue and Santa Lucia Avenue - Much of the east side of the street is a bus loading zone with no parking during school hours.
• Driskill Street & La Puerta Avenue
- Yellow school-style ladder crosswalk was observed on the eastern leg of the intersection. - The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.

East-West Streets
La Puerta Avenue
Figure 4. Observed Corridor of La Puerta Avenue
783
398 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Rose Avenue
Figure 5. Observed Corridor of Rose Avenue
• Rose Avenue & 3rd Street
- Large intersection with high volume of truck traffic. No crosswalk on north leg, likely to avoid conflict with left turning vehicles (Figure 6).
- With the new school location, the south leg crosswalk may become more important as a ped connection. It is of the standard variety.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.

Figure 6. Truck traffic and intersection size at Rose & 3rd 784
399 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
• Rose Avenue & Santa Lucia Avenue
- No crosswalk on south leg.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- Pavement quality is quite poor on the east leg.
- There is bike signal activation northbound on Rose on the south leg. - Driveways to businesses on the west side of Rose interact with the intersection. • Rose Avenue & 1st Street
- No crosswalk on north leg.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.

Gibraltar Street
Figure 7. Observed Corridor of Gibraltar Street
• Gibraltar Street & San Luis Street
- The intersection was stop controlled, despite most other three-legged intersections in the neighborhood lacking minor street stop control.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- There were no marked crosswalks despite the proximity to a neighborhood park. • Gibraltar Street south of San Jacinto Street.
- Sidewalk uplift was observed on the east side of the street. 785
400 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
East-West Streets
Santa Lucia Avenue
Figure 8. Observed Corridor of Santa Lucia Avenue
• Santa Lucia Avenue & alley east of Rose
- Good tactile domes/ADA compliant ramps at the alley entrance. • Santa Lucia Avenue between Rose Avenue and Kohala Street - Corridor treatment. Poor pavement quality, faded markings, curb ramps not up to ADA standards, three-legged intersections are uncontrolled and lack minor street stop control (Figure 9).

Figure 9. Typical corridor condition along Santa Lucia Avenue 786
401 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
• Santa Lucia Avenue between Featherstone and Imperial
- Existing speed humps are quite low, not effective at slowing vehicles (Figure 10). Vehicles were observed not braking at all before hitting the speed humps.

Figure 10. Speed hump condition along Santa Lucia.

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
The team observed at Driskill and Gaucho to observe pick-up procedures right in front of the school campus, as well as crosswalk procedures at Driskill and Santa Lucia.

Driskill Street & Gaucho Way:
- Crossing guard at Gaucho crosswalk.
- 2:15 pm- TK used the northern exit, K used the southern exit along Driskill. - Parents pick-up kids at the north gate, teachers lead students to buses at south gate. - Despite cones being set up, cars were parked at the curb along Driskill. - 2:20pm – 1-5 dismissal – very high bus and walk mode share. - Minimal parking & double parking along Driskill.
- Very minimal mid-block crossing along Driskill.
- 10 minutes total, not chaotic.
- Overall, this school is largely a model for minimizing congestion and conflicts at dismissal from the teams observations on the walk audit day.
787
402 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Driskill Street & Santa Lucia Avenue:
- Crossing guard arrived at Driskill & Santa Lucia at 2:15pm. - Another crossing guard was present at Gaucho driveway. - Five buses arrived at 2:15pm, leave at 2:20pm sharp.
- Challenging visibility with school buses parked at crosswalk. - Vehicles were observed parked in red curb along Driskill. - One car was observed making a mid-block illegal U-turn. - Traffic was mostly cleared out by 2:25pm.
- Very high bus and walking mode share was observed.
- Drivers seemed well behaved and patient.
788
403 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Prepared By:

Sierra Linda Elementary School (TK-5)
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Technical Appendix
789
404 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

1. Collision and Citation Trends
This section summarizes the collision analysis and citation analysis within a quarter mile of the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activity is concentrated as students approach or depart the school campus. Collision data from 2016 through 2020 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department and validated against the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Citation data from 2016 through 2022 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department.

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along H Street and Vineyard Avenue. Collisions involving individuals under the age of 16 concentrated along H Street and Vineyard Avenue as well. 790
405 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
There were two pedestrian collisions within the study area and both of them were present along Vineyard Avenue. No collisions involved a bicyclist.
791
406 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Putting all the information together, none of the collisions involving someone under the age of 16 were a pedestrian or bicycle collision resulting in an injury (severe or otherwise). One collision resulting in a severe injury occurred at the intersection of Lobelia Drive and Vineyard Ave, which involved a pedestrian.
792
407 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 37 injury collisions between 2016-2020 within a quarter mile radius of Sierra Linda Elementary School. One collision resulted in a severe injury. 24% of collisions within a quarter mile radius of the school involved someone under the age of 16, none of which involved a pedestrian or cyclist. Major intersections for collisions include: H Street & Vineyard Avenue, H Street & Holly Avenue, H Street & Bluebell Place and Lantana Street & Juneberry Place.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Right of Way Violations (49%), which mostly involved drivers not yielding at a stop sign or before making a left turn, and Improper Turning (14%). Collision clusters for these violations are Vineyard Avenue & Kentia Avenue, Vineyard Avenue & H Street, and H Street & Bluebell Place.
793
408 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Injury Collisions Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Sierra Linda Elementary (2016 – 2020) Total Injury Collisions 37
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions
1 (3%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old
9 (24%) (KSI: 0)
Pedestrian-Involved 2 (5%) (KSI: 0)
Bicycle-Involved 0
Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Vehicle Right of Way Violation 18 49%
Improper Turning 5 14%
Unsafe Speeds 4 11%
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
4 11%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 62 40%
Rear End 41 27%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 2 5%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 9 24%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 11 30%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 14 38%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 2 5%
Dark – Streetlights 12 32%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 21 57%
Dusk/Dawn 2 5%
Roadway Classification
Count Percent of Total
Primary 22 59%
Secondary 10 27%
Minor 5 14%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 4 11%
No 33 89%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
794
409 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
H Street 23
Vehicle Right of Way Violation
(13)
Unsafe Speed (3)
There were 23 collisions along H
Street within a quarter mile of
campus. 15 of these collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

Vehicle Right of Way Violation (13)
and Unsafe Speed (3) were the
leading causes of collision. There
was a concentration of 13 collisions
at the Vineyard Avenue intersection
(35% of all collisions). More than
half of the collisions that occurred
at this intersection were the result
of a failure to yield after a left turn
or U-turn. A smaller concentration
of 4 collisions occurred at Bluebell
Place. Three of the collisions were
the result of a failure to yield at the
stop or after a left turn which led to
broadside or head-on collisions.

Vineyard Avenue
Both pedestrian-involved collisions
and the only severe injury collision
within a quarter mile of the school
occurred on Vineyard Avenue,
which is subject to relatively high
instances of hard braking and
moderate instances of harsh
acceleration. The severe injury
collision occurred at the Kentia
Street intersection after a driver
failed to yield before making a left
turn.

Vineyard Avenue & Edelweiss
Street 7
7 collisions occurred at the Vineyard
Avenue & Edelweiss Street
intersection just east of the quarter
mile radius around the school. One
of these collisions involved a
pedestrian crossing outside of a
marked crosswalk and an
eastbound vehicle. There is no
crosswalk on the east or west leg of
the intersection at this intersection.
795
410 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 54 71%
Running Stop Sign 19 25%
Running Red Light 2 3%
Improper Turning 1 1%

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
796
411 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2016-2020 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
As part of the preparations for the walk audit, the SRTS team organized virtual kick-off meetings, inviting key staff members from participating schools. This school either declined the invitations or confirmed their participation after the walk audit had already been conducted. 797
412 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: 11/28/2023
- Meet time: 2:15 PM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
Figure 1. Walk audit route
798
413 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Ironbark Drive
Figure 2. Observed Corridor of Ironbark Drive
• Ironbark Drive south of Holly
- Sidewalk uplift observed near tree wells.
• Ironbark Drive & Gladiola Street
- The existing crosswalks were in poor condition and of a standard school variety. - The existing curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- The curb ramp on the northeast corner of the intersection is missing despite it being the landing of a marked crosswalk.
- Cars were parked across the stop bar, blocking the visibility of the north leg during dismissal time.
799
414 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
• Ironbark Drive & Azalea Street
- The sharp curve had stop bars and a SLOW marking to alert drivers to the presence of the curve (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Slow markings at Ironbark & Azalea
• Ironbark Drive north of Azalea Street
- Sidewalk uplift was observed from vegetation and street trees. • Ironbark Drive & Erica Street
- The existing curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
• Ironbark Drive & Bluebell Street
- Stop sign is too small to be compliant with MUTCD, which may limit its visibility to road users.
• Ironbark Drive & Holly Street
- There were no striped crosswalks at this intersection, despite its presence to the school campus. Many people were observed crossing during dismissal and the walk audit to access the school and park.
800
415 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
East-West Streets
Gladiola Street
Figure 4. Observed Corridor of Gladiola Street
• Gladiola Street & Jasmine Street
- The existing crosswalk was a standard yellow school crosswalk 45 degrees diagonally across the curve of the road (Figure 5).
- The existing curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- The tight radii of the curve leads to potential hazards for oncoming vehicles if a vehicle cuts the corner.
- When cars are parked along the inner portion of the curve on Jasmine, it makes visibility difficult between drivers and pedestrians.

Figure 5. Crosswalk on curve at Gladiola & Jasmine
801
416 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Jasmine Street
Figure 6. Observed Corridor of Jasmine Street
• Jasmine Street north of Fuchsia Street
- Sidewalk uplift was noted due to vegetation on the west side of the street. • Jasmine Street & Fuchsia Street
- Older style crosswalk on side street.
- The intersection was uncontrolled and lacked stop signs • Jasmine Street & Dahlia Street
- The intersection was uncontrolled and lacked stop signs. • Jasmine Street & Camelia Street
- The intersection was uncontrolled and lacked stop signs. • Jasmine Street & Bluebell Street
- The intersection was uncontrolled and lacked stop signs. • Jasmine Street & Azalea Street
- The intersection has compliant ramps, adequate striping and signage. Looks good. 802
417 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
H Street
Figure 7. Observed Corridor of H Street
• H Street between Gonzales Road and Erica Place
- A marked speed limit was observed of 40 miles per hour, despite having residential structures with driveways opening on to the street, a Class II bikeway, and an RRFB at Erica Place.
• H Street & Gonzales Road
- The curb ramps on the northeast and northwest corners lacked tactile warning pads. • H Street & Erica Place
- An RRFB was present at this crosswalk (Figure 8). (Note, the posted speed along H Street is 40 MPH, which, per FHWA guidance would require the consideration of a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon.)The curb ramp on the east landing of the crosswalk was missing a tactile pad.

Figure 8. Typical corridor condition along Santa Lucia Avenue 803
418 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
- This was a very wide crossing for pedestrians.
• H Street & Bluebell Street
- Sidewalk uplift was observed on the west side of the street. - No crossing of H Street was provided.
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- The distance across Bluebell was very wide for pedestrians. • H Street & Aster Street
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.

East-West Streets
Bluebell Place
Figure 9. Observed Corridor of Bluebell Place
• Bluebell Place between Koala Place & Fauna Drive
- The street trees end just east of Koala Place intersection. 804
419 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
• Bluebell Place & Koala Place
- The curb ramps lacked tactile warning pads.
- The intersection was uncontrolled and lacked stop signs. - Cars were seen parked right up and into the intersection off Koala (Figure 10).

Figure 10. Cars parked up to intersection at Bluebell & Koala • Bluebell Place & Fauna Drive
- The curb ramps linking to the pedestrian cut-through lacked tactile warning pads. - The road turns sharply 90 degrees, leading to potential conflicts between opposing vehicles if a driver cuts the corner.

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
The team observed at Ironbark Drive and Gladiola Street to observe students crossing and pick-up procedures at this busy intersection, as well as at the curve between Jasmine Street an Gladiola Street where a diagonal crosswalk was present across the curve intersection.

Ironbark Drive & Gladiola Street:
- By 2:40pm, Ironbark was parked up with parents.
- Three buses arrive at 2:45pm to pick up students, another three buses arrived at 2:55pm. - Double parking was observed along Ironbark. Parking was also seen across driveways in the neighborhood.
- Lots of parents were picking up on kids on foot.
- Some midblock crossings were observed along Ironbark. - No crossing guards were present at Ironbark & Gladiola - TK/K/1st grade dismissed along Ironbark. Parents and kids were seen crossing at Holly Avenue.
805
420 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
- A few U-Turns were observed midblock along Ironbark.
- All clear and uncongested by 3:05pm.

Jasmine Street & Gladiola Street:
- Bus zone seen on Ironbark.
- No entry into the driveway and parking lot at the corner of Ironbark and Gladiola. Was coned off during dismissal period (Figure 11).
- Parents use the larger lot off of Gladiola to park and pick-up kids. - Gladiola and Jasmine both parked up by 2:45pm, Jasmine all the way down to Elder Street. - Parents were leaving cars with hazard flashers on in red curb zone at 2:50pm, 2:55pm. - Cutting the corner was an issue at Gladiola and Jasmine curve. The curve is tight when two vehicles are moving through at the same time.
- Some compliance issues with vehicles yielding at crosswalk. - Parking in front of driveway at 2:55pm.
- No crossing guard at crosswalk at corner
- A high car mode share was observed, with a lot of adults also walking to pick up kids.

Three bikes were observed.
- Starting to dissipate by 3:05pm, all clear by 3:10pm.

Figure 11. Coned off driveway entrance at Gladiola and Ironbark. 806
421 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Soria School (K-8)
Prepared By:

City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Technical Appendix
807
422 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

1. Collision and Citation Trends
This section summarizes the collision analysis and citation analysis within a quarter mile of the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activity is concentrated as students approach or depart the school campus. Collision data from 2016 through 2020 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department and validated against the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Citation data from 2016 through 2022 was provided by the Oxnard Police Department.

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along 5th Street and Patterson Road. Collisions involving someone under the age of 16 also clustered on 5th Street and Patterson Road. There were no severe injury or fatality collisions within the study area.
808
423 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
There was one pedestrian collision at the intersection of 5th Street and Patterson Road. Bike collisions clustered along 5th Street and Patterson Road. 809
424 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Putting all the information together, there was one pedestrian collision that involved someone under the age of 16 and two bike collisions that involved some one under the age of 16. 810
425 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 30 injury collisions between 2016-2020 within a quarter mile radius of Juan Lagunas Soria School. No collisions resulted in a fatality or severe injury. 5 collisions (17%) within a quarter mile radius of the school involved someone under the age of 16. Most collisions occurred along 5th Street immediately north of campus.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Vehicle Right of Way Violation (23%), Unsafe Speed (20%), and Traffic Signals & Signs (17%). All of the Unsafe Speed collisions occurred within one block of each other— at the intersections of Patterson Road & 5th Street and Patterson Road & Dunkirk Drive. Vehicle Right of Way Violation collisions occurred along 5th Street and Dunkirk Drive, and Traffic Signals & Signs collisions occurred on 5th Street and Patterson Road. 811
426 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Soria School (2016 – 2020) Total Injury Collisions 30
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions
0 Collisions with victim under 16
years old
5 (17%) (KSI: 0)
Pedestrian-Involved 1 (3%) (KSI: 0)
Bicycle-Involved 4 (13%) (KSI: 0)
Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Vehicle Right of Way Violation 7 23%
Unsafe Speed 6 20%
Traffic Signals and Signs 5 17%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 11 37%
Rear End 5 17%
Sideswipe 5 17%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 6 20%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 6 20%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 13 43%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 5 17%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 5 17%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 22 73%
Dusk/Dawn 2 7%
Roadway Classification
Count Percent of Total
Primary 18 60%
Secondary 9 30%
Minor 3 10%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 1 3%
No 29 97%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
812
427 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
5th Street 18
There was a concentration of
collisions (10) at the intersection of
5th Street & Patterson Road. The
intersection has been signalized,
has had standard crosswalks on all
legs, and curb cuts/ramps on all
corners.

There was a bicyclist-involved
collision between Southampton
Place & Portofino Place: both the
cyclist and the vehicle were
traveling westbound. 5th Street is a
4-lane roadway with Class II bike
lanes.

There was another bicyclistinvolved collision and one
pedestrian-involved collision at the
Patterson Road intersection. A
westbound cyclist was traveling on
the wrong side of the road and
collided with an eastbound vehicle.

There was a class II bike lane on the
westbound side of the road and a
median separating east/westbound
traffic. A northbound driver was
making a right turn onto 5th Street
and struck a pedestrian in the
crosswalk. The intersection is
signalized, and the right turn is a
slip lane with a yield sign. There was
a standard crosswalk at the time of
the collision which leads from the
sidewalk to a pedestrian island at
the base of the intersection signal.

Dunkirk Drive 7
One of these collisions involved a
bicyclist and occurred at the
Patterson Road intersection. This
intersection is controlled by a
roundabout. There are Class II bike
lanes south of the intersection,
however, the northbound bike lane
ends about 80 feet before the
intersection. Actions preceding the
collision were not reported.
813
428 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign 3 43%
Improper Turning 2 29%
Speeding 2 29%

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
814
429 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2. Walk Audit
• Most students live within the district boundaries and walk to school or are dropped off. A smaller percentage of students (10-15%) bike or skateboard. • Key locations include: the drop-off zone near school gym, nearby intersections and the school parking lot.
• Key issues include: congestion due to overenrollment and late arrivals, dropoffs in unauthorized areas wherever space is available, conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles at intersections and within parking lots, and rushed morning drop-offs.

The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2016-2020 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Chris Ramirez, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
815
430 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Friday, November 18, 2022
- Start time: 11:00 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear
- Events/Unique Conditions: Minimum day (dismissal at 12:25 (K-5th) and 12:22pm (6th-8th)) - Attendees:

1. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

2. Tom Reilly – LSY Enterprise

3. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

4. Rachel Om – Fehr & Peers

5. Alex Sarno – Fehr & Peers
Figure 1. Walk audit route
816
431 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

East-West Streets
Dunkirk Drive
Figure 2. Observed Corridor of Dunkirk Drive
• Dunkirk Drive between Northport Lane & Freeport Lane
- None of the intersection in this segment of Dunkirk Drive had a high visibility continental crosswalks on the south leg. In order to help funnel parents/guardians and students to the places where there are north-south crosswalks it is recommended to stripe high visibility crosswalks and install tactile dome pads on the south leg of all intersections, and install a sign for northbound traffic that says, “crossing traffic does not stop,” within this segment of Dunkirk Drive.
• Dunkirk Drive & Northport Lane
- The injury collision analysis revealed that a vehicle-to-vehicle collision occurred at this intersection and was due to a driver not yielding at the stop sign. The northbound stop sign was measured to be approximately two feet in width and should be replaced with a bigger sign.
817
432 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
- Some people were observed crossing at this intersection, but there are no striped crosswalks or curb extensions (Figure 3). It was observed that a curb extension on the southwest corner of the intersection, creating a curb cut on the north side of the sidewalk, striping a crosswalk on the west leg, and piloting a closure of the parking lot entrance during the dismissal period may benefit the intersection.

Figure 3. Parent/guardian and students crossing Dunkirk Drive & Northport Lane • Dunkirk Drive & Halifax Lane
- Many walking parents/guardians, students and vehicles cross this intersection. • Dunkirk Drive & Genoa Lane
- The northbound stop sign was measured to be approximately two feet in width and should be replaced with a bigger sign.
• Dunkirk Drive & Genoa Lane
- The northbound stop sign was measured to be approximately two feet in width and should be replaced with a bigger sign.
• Dunkirk Drive & Freeport Lane
- The northbound stop sign was measured to be approximately two feet in width and should be replaced with a bigger sign.
818
433 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
• Dunkirk Drive & Patterson Road
- The injury collision analysis revealed that a vehicle-to-bike sideswipe collision occurred at this roundabout (Figure 4). It was observed that there is a southbound bike lane north of the intersection and bike lanes in both directions south of the intersection; additionally, there are two lanes north and south of the intersection which merge into one as they enter the intersection, however there are no signs telling drivers and cyclists to share the road when merging, nor are there bike lane markings in the roundabout. It is recommended to install signage in the north and southbound directions that warn drivers and cyclists to share the road when the lanes merge, stripe bike sharrow markings in the roundabout.

Figure 4. Cyclist and vehicles using the Dunkirk Drive & Patterson Road roundabout 819
434 | Appendix B School Technical Reports
Figure 5. Observed Corridor of Patterson Road
Figure 6. Right turn slip lane on Patterson
Road & 5th Street
Figure 7. Right turn slip lane on Patterson Road & 5th
Street; and eastbound bike lane on 5th Street

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Patterson Road
• Patterson Road & 5th Street
- The injury collision analysis revealed there was a vehicle-to-pedestrian collision where a northbound vehicle was attempting to turn right. The pedestrian island configuration located here may have caused confusion for the parties involved. It is recommended to evaluate the signal timing and traffic flow of removing the pedestrian island; and, consider moving the streetlight.
- There is no conflict striping along the eastbound bike lanes where vehicles turn at this intersection. It is recommended to stripe bike conflict striping on the west and east side of the intersection to enhance cyclist safety (Figure 6, Figure 7). 820
435 | Oxnard Safe Routes to School Appendices
- Patterson Road between 5th Street and Dunkirk Drive
- There is no northbound bike lane on this street segment; however, there are bikes lanes on 5th Street and Patterson Road south of Dunkirk Drive. To provide a safe space to connect to these facilities, it is recommended to restripe the northbound right turn lane to make space for a Class II bike lane (Figure 6).

Figure 8. Eastbound bike lane on west side of 5th Street & Patterson Road intersection - A portion of the sidewalk on the west side Patterson Road is disrupted by a gravel driveway for an evacuation site (Figure 9). It is recommended to repave this with concrete to establish a continuous sidewalk connection for pedestrians.

Figure 9. Evacuation site driveway on Patterson Road
821
436 | Appendix B School Technical Reports

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
School dismissal observations identified key transportation corridors used to get to and from the school, as well as how parents/guardians and students navigate the dismissal period. • There are school entrances on the west side facing the school parking lot and on the south side facing Dunkirk Drive. Cross streets that provide access to Dunkirk Drive include Portofino Place, Northport Lane, Marbella Court, Lazaro Lane, Ibiza Lane, Halifax Lane, Genoa Lane, Freeport Lane and Patterson Road.
• During the dismissal period, parents/guardians picking up their students would park along Dunkirk Drive and other connector streets to the south (e.g. Northport Lane, Marbella Court, etc.) (Figure 12). Some would wait on the north side of Dunkirk Drive along the school perimeter and others would wait for their students in their vehicles.

Figure 10. Dunkirk Drive during the dismissal period
• The roundabouts at Dunkirk Drive & Lazaro Lane and Dunkirk Drive & Halifax Lane were observed to function well because traffic flowed steadily without significant congestion, vehicles proceeded at safe speeds, and vehicles making U-turns did so safely (Figure 11).

Figure 11. Parents/guardians waiting for their students on Dunkirk Drive & Lazaro Lane 822
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Ansgar Larsen Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
823

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Channel Islands Boulevard within the study area. Additionally, collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age were concentrated along Channel Islands Boulevard and Cloyne Street. There was one fatality injury collision and one severe injury collision, which occurred along Channel Islands Boulevard as well. 824
Within the study area, there were three pedestrian collisions reported: one occurred along Channel Islands Boulevard and the other two on Cloyne Street. Additionally, there was one bicycle collision, which took place at the intersection of Channel Islands Boulevard and Cloyne Street.
825
Collisions within the study area were predominantly concentrated along Channel Islands Boulevard. Notably, both a fatality collision and a severe injury collision occurred along this route. Furthermore, collisions involving individuals under the age of 16 were also highly concentrated along Channel Islands Boulevard.
826

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 64 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of Ansgar Larsen School. The study area recorded one fatal collision and one severe injury collision. Both Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI) collisions occurred on Channel Islands Boulevard and involved individuals under the age of 16. The fatal collision, which happened during the morning hours, was caused by a pedestrian violation. The cause of the violation leading to the severe injury collision was unknown.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (30%), Improper Turning (14%), and Unsafe Speed (14%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions were spatially spread out within the study area with a concentration along Channel Islands Boulevard.
• Improper Turning collisions were prevalent along Cloyne Street. • Unsafe Speed collisions were also prevalent along Channel Islands Boulevard and Gisler Avenue.
827
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Ansgar Larsen School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 64
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 2 (3%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 26 (41%) (KSI: 2 – 100% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 3 (5%) (KSI: 1 – 50% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 1 (2%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 19 30%
Improper Turning 9 14%
Unsafe Speed 9 14%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Rear End 25 39%
Broadside 24 38%
Sideswipe 5 8%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 12 19%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 14 22%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 18 28%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 20 31%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 1 2%
Dark – Streetlights 21 33%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 41 64%
Dusk/Dawn 1 2%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 8 13%
No 55 86%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
828
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Channel Islands Boulevard 45
Automobile Right of Way (16)
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
(6)
Following Too Closely (6)
Nearly half of the collisions within
the study area occurred during
daylight hours. Along Channel
Islands Boulevard, there was one
fatality injury collision (near Gisler
Street) and one severe injury
collision (near Paula Street), both
involving individuals under the age
of 16. The fatal collision occurred
during the morning peak hours and
was attributed to a pedestrian
violation. The severe injury collision
took place at night, and the specific
violation involved remains
unknown.

Channel Islands Boulevard &
Cloyne Street 9 Traffic Signals and Signs (4)
Around two-thirds of the collisions
at this intersection occurred during
night hours. None of these
collisions resulted in a fatality or
severe injury. Around half of the
collisions involved individuals under
the age of 16.

Channel Islands Boulevard &
Gisler Street 16 Automobile Right of Way (4)
More than two-thirds of the
collisions happened during daylight
hours. There was one fatal collision
happened along Channel Islands
Boulevard near to the intersection
with Gisler Street.
829

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
830
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 89 60%
Running Stop Sign 59 40%
831

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Evelyn Jimenez, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• Most students are dropped-off and picked-up by parents who drive. Less than 40 students take the bus, and no students ride their bicycle to school. • Circulation during drop-off and pick-up is challenging. There are no east/west cross streets between La Canada Ave and Channel Islands Blvd. • Despite falling enrollment, there are congestion issues at both sides of the campus. • There are visibility concerns from the alley on the south side of Sequoia Street. 832

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Friday, January 17, 2025
Start time: 3:00 PM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Principal Evelyn Jimenez – Ansgar Larsen

2. Parents/Staff – Ansgar Larsen

3. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

4. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

5. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
833

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Cloyne Street

2.3.1 Cloyne St, Channel Islands Blvd, and La Canada Ave

2.3.1.1 The driveways at these intersections are very steep and have cross slope issues that impact accessibility.

2.3.2 Cloyne St and James Ave

2.3.2.1 Both the curb ramps and stop signs at this intersection need to be upgraded.

2.3.3 Cloyne St and McMillan Ave

2.3.3.1 The sidewalk is in poor condition and the stop sign is small; it is recommended to repair the sidewalk North and South of McMillan, add a bigger stop sign, and upgrade the curb ramps on the west leg.

2.3.4 Cloyne St and La Canada Ave

2.3.4.1 All curb ramps and stop signs need to be upgraded, and high visibility crosswalks are needed on the east, west, and north legs. This area sees many Blackstock students walking through, increasing the importance of these improvements.

2.3.5 Cloyne St and Lark St

2.3.5.1 The curb ramps need to be upgraded, and the intersection should be evaluated for a possible curb extension.

2.3.6 Cloyne St and Thomas Ave

2.3.6.1 The curb ramps need upgrades, crosswalks should be upgraded to high visibility, and tactile warnings and flashing lights should be added to the stop sign to enhance safety.

2.3.7 Cloyne St and De Anza Way

2.3.7.1 Tactile warning markers are missing, and any markings should be refreshed.

Fournier Ave

2.3.8 Fournier Ave and Sequoia St

2.3.8.1 All stop signs should be replaced, curb ramps should be upgraded, and high-visibility crosswalks should be added. A curb extension should be considered, along with a new crosswalk on the west leg.

2.3.9 Fournier Ave and Alley

2.3.9.1 Pedestrian mirrors should be added at the wall to improve visibility, lighting should be installed in the alley to improve nighttime safety, as well as adding a stop sign at alley entrance/exit.

2.3.10 Fournier and Tamarac St

2.3.10.1 The curb ramps at this intersection should be upgraded and side street stop control should be added.

2.3.11 Fournier Driveway (School Entrance)
834

2.3.11.1 Yellow retro-reflective paint is present on the school driveway. The stop signs should be upgraded to flashing lights, and tactile warning pads should be added for pedestrian safety.

East-West Streets
La Canada Ave

2.3.12 La Canada Ave and Cloyne St

2.3.12.1 The sidewalks at this intersection are narrow, and the south side path is obstructed by a hydrant, limiting accessibility.

2.3.13 La Canada and Fournier

2.3.13.1 All ramps and signage should be upgraded, although the existing legs are currently in fair condition. Crosswalks should be restriped, and a new crosswalk should be added to the west leg.

2.3.13.2 There are small stop signs on the E/S/W legs; it is recommended to upgrade to high visibility crosswalks and upgrade ramps

2.3.14 La Canada, Cloyne, and Fournier

2.3.14.1 The sidewalks at this intersection are narrow, and the south side path is obstructed by hydrants, limiting accessibility.
835

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

East-West Streets
Channel Islands Blvd

2.4.1 Channel Islands Blvd, Albany Dr, and Fournier St

2.4.1.1 Utility poles block the clear path of travel on the south side.

2.4.2 Channel Islands Blvd and Albany Dr

2.4.2.1 Utility poles block the clear path of travel on the south side, and all crosswalks should be upgraded to high-visibility markings. The buffered bike lanes on both sides of Channel Islands are wide.

2.4.2.2 There is no landing pad at the bus stop east of the railroad crossing, which creates a trip hazard. A clear path of travel should be added across the tracks.

2.4.3 Channel Islands Blvd and Railroad Crossing (W/O Albany Dr.)

2.4.3.1 There is no landing pad at the bus stop east of the railroad crossing, which creates a trip hazard. A clear path of travel should be added across the tracks.

2.4.4 Channel Islands Blvd and (E/O) Cloyne St.

2.4.4.1 A sign is blocking the clear path of travel on the south side and should be relocated.

2.4.5 Channel Islands Blvd and (E/O) Paula St.

2.4.5.1 Obstruction of the walking path was observed; it is recommended to add a clear path of travel.

Paula Street

2.4.6 Paula St, Clinton St, and Sequoia St

2.4.6.1 There was sidewalk uplift observed on the west side, and the sidewalk is narrow; it is recommended to upgrade ramps at all intersections and add stop signs.

2.4.6.2 S/O Channel Islands, the sidewalk by the electrical pole needs repair on the West side.

2.4.7 Paula St and Clinton St

2.4.7.1 The east side ramps should be upgraded, and side-street stop control should be added to improve safety.

2.4.7.2 The curb ramps at this intersection need to be upgraded, and side-street stop control should be added.

Other Notes

2.4.8 Circle Dr and Alley Access

2.4.8.1 Curve markings should be implemented to create safer turns for vehicles and pedestrians.

2.4.9 Sequoia St and Entrance Alley

2.4.9.1 Pedestrian mirrors are needed to improve visibility, and mirrors should also be installed at nearby corner crossings where the sightlines are limited. 836

2.5 Dismissal Observations
The team observed dismissal at two locations: Sequoia Street & the alley/Fournier Street and Cloyne Street & Thomas Avenue.

General Observations:
- Dismissal traffic builds around 2:45pm; clears around 3:00pm - Most pedestrian traffic clears by 2:55pm
- Staggered dismissal at 2:07pm, 2:40pm, and 2:46pm helps spread the peak - School dismisses out multiple entrances, helping to spread the demand - Dismissal is highly controlled with parents/guardians parking and lining up to collect their students Cloyne St:
- School has experimented with closing the driveway at Cloyne St entirely due to driver behavior. They reported to have reopened this year with more aggressive communication to parents/guardians Fournier & Sequoia:
- The vehicle pick-up loop at Fournier & Sequoia is working well; no queue observed 837
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Art Haycox Elementary School (K-5)
Prepared By:
838

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
This Collision Trends analysis includes injury collisions from 2018 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary. The analysis focuses on the quarter-mile radius around the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activities are concentrated when students are approaching or departing campus. Collisions were fairly spread within the area and notably clustered on Hueneme Road and Saviers Road. Within the buffer area, there were eight collisions resulting in fatalities or severe injuries.
839
Pedestrian and bike collisions were spread within the buffer area and concentrated along J Street and Hueneme Road.
840
Putting all the information together, collisions on J Street frequently involved individuals under the age of 16. KSI collisions clustered along Saviers Road. Additionally, collisions resulting in severe injuries or fatalities were more likely to involve a pedestrian or bike, as opposed to those resulting in minor injuries.
841
Key Findings
Injury Collision Summary
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Art Haycox Elementary (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 84
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 8 (10%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 23 (43%) (KSI: 2 – 25% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 13 (9%) (KSI: 3 – 38% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 8 (1%) (KSI: 1 – 13% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 23 27%
Improper Turning 14 17%
Improper Turning 14 17%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 36 43%
Rear End 12 14%
Rear End 12 14%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 14 17%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 19 23%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 19 23%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 32 38%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 2 2%
Dark – Streetlights 26 31%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 48 57%
Dusk/Dawn 8 10%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 10 12%
No 74 88%
Times in bold are when school is in session.
842
Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Hueneme Road 37
Automobile Right of Way (10)
Unsafe Speed (7)
Improper Turning (6)
Around half of these collisions
occurred during daylight hours. 25
of the collisions occurred at
intersections (see below). There
were two severe injury collisions,
and both occurred in the middle of
the street.

Hueneme Road & J Street 7 Improper Turning (3)
Hueneme Road & J Street
Intersection is southwest of the
School. Three of these collisions
involved someone under 16 years
old and one involved a pedestrian.

Hueneme Road & Saviers Road 6 Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug (3)
Five of the six collisions occurred at
night. There were two collisions at
this intersection involving someone
under 16 years old.

Saviers Road 23
Automobile Right of Way (9)
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
(4)
Unsafe Speed (4)
There were five severe injury
collisions occurring on Saviers Road,
and four happened at night. Two of
these were due to unsafe speed and
two due to pedestrian violation.

Around half of 23 collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

Saviers Road & Clara Street 9 Automobile Right of Way (5) Eight of the nine collisions occurred
during daylight hours. There were
three collisions involving someone
under 16 years old and none of
these collisions involved a
pedestrian or bicyclist.

J Street 15 Improper Turning (4)
Five of these collisions involved
someone under 16 years old.

Around half of 23 collisions
occurred during daylight hours.
843
Summary Notes
• There were 84 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Art Haycox Elementary School.
• Eight resulted in a severe injury. Two of these involved someone under 16 years of age.

There were no fatal collisions.
• There were 23 collisions involving a pedestrian and 13 involving a bicyclist. Five collisions involving a pedestrian also involved someone under 16 years of age. Two Collisions involving a bicyclist also involved someone under 16 years of age. • Concentrations of collisions occurred along Hueneme Road and Saviers Road.

Action During Collisions
• The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (43%), Improper Turning (14%), and Unsafe Speed (14%).
o Automobile Right of Way collisions cluster at the intersection of Saviers Road and Clara Street.
o Improper Turning collisions almost exclusively occurred along J Street within the study area.
o Unsafe Speed collisions were fairly spread out of the study area. Three of the right KSI collisions within the study area were due to unsafe speed. 844

1.2 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
845
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard 10 48%
Running Stop Sign8 38%
Biking Wrong Way3 14%
846
• Most students live in the surrounding neighborhood, which is densely populated neighborhood. Most of the students are walk to and from school, but lots of the kids are getting dropped off by cars. Approximately 35 to 40% are dropped off by car, which has increased a lot over the years. • Principal Peña has communicated to parents to try walking if within 4 blocks of the school.
• Bus services are provided for students that are going to middle school. • Key locations include: Perkins Road at “U” Driveway (bus hub and entrance to one of the staff parking lot) and Perkins Road & Clara Street (crossing guard location)
• Key issues include: high vehicle speeds, double parking, street blockages, narrow sidewalks

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Julianne Peña, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
847

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Thursday, January 25, 2024
- Start time: 7:30 AM
- Weather Conditions: Rainy
- Events/Unique Conditions: On the day of the walk audit, there was increased police presence due to an incident that occurred the day before.
- Attendees:

1. Principal Julianne Peña – Art Haycox

2. Parent group – Art Haycox

3. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

4. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

5. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
848

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Perkins Road

2.3.1 Perkins Road & Alley

2.3.1.1 A mounted mirror is recommended to help with the visibility of the cars entering or exiting the alley.

2.3.1.2 There are lots of drivers speeding through the alley.

2.3.1.3 There are flooding issues in this area correlated to drainage issues.

2.3.1.4 A speed table is recommended at the intersection to reduce speed.

2.3.1.5 There is no parking in the alley, but people still park there.

2.3.1.6 The alley could be another point of entry at a gate for people walking to and from school.
849
East-West Streets
Clara Street

2.3.2 Clara Street & Driveway

2.3.2.1 The curb ramps near Clinicas and the preschool need to be upgraded.

2.3.2.2 The sidewalks have an uplift and need to be repaired near Clinicas and the preschool need.

2.3.2.3 The staff parking lot has a single two-way driveway for entering and exiting, but there is no signage or yellow paint marking the driveway. 850

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Saviers Road
- It is recommended to add conflict stripping on the bike lanes along the segment of the road.

2.4.1 Saviers Road & Clara Street

2.4.1.1 There is a bus stop present near the intersection. It is recommended to test the distance between the signals and consider a new one.

2.4.2 Saviers Road & Hueneme Road

2.4.2.1 There are two standard and an unmarked crosswalk at the intersection. It is recommended to install new crosswalks and curb ramps.

Courtland Street

2.4.3 Courtland Street & Clara Street

2.4.3.1 There are unmarked crosswalks on the west and east leg of the intersection. There are standard crosswalks on the north and south legs of the intersection. It is recommended for the curb ramps and the crosswalks to be updated.

2.4.3.2 It is recommended to add supervision at this intersection given it is near a bus stop.

2.4.3.3 There was no parking on the park side. It is recommended to convert to diagonal parking along the park.

2.4.4 Courtland Street & Carlislie Court

2.4.4.1 There is an entrance to the nearby park, Southwinds Park.

2.4.4.2 It is recommended the curb ramp be upgraded.

2.4.4.3 There are flooding issues in this area correlated to drainage issues.

2.4.4.4 There was no parking on the park side.

2.4.5 Courtland Street & Cuesta Del Mar Drive

2.4.5.1 There is a sidewalk uplift that is recommended to be repaired. 851
East-West Streets
Clara Street

2.4.6 Clara Street & Roland

2.4.6.1 There are no crosswalks at the intersection. It is recommended to add a stop sign on the side street since it is needed.

2.4.7 Clara Street & J Street

2.4.7.1 A high-visibility all-way stop control (AWSC) crosswalk is needed.

2.4.7.2 It is recommended to reconstruct the curb ramps.

Cuesta Del Mar Drive
- It is recommended to add speed bumps along this street and convert to diagonal parking, as the wide street encourages vehicles to drive faster.

2.4.8 Cuesta Del Mar Drive & Alley

2.4.8.1 There is a sidewalk uplift that should be repaired.

2.4.8.2 Drivers are exiting the alley to quickly onto the drive. It is recommended for the alley to be daylighted, leaving a clear line of sight for drivers.

2.4.8.3 A gate at the alley that leads into the school grounds could be opened with supervision.

2.4.9 Cuesta Del Mar Drive & Perkins Road

2.4.9.1 There are three continental crosswalks and a street extension that drivers are not adhering to at the intersection. It is recommended to add an extra crossing guard at this location.

2.4.9.2 There are flooding issues in this area correlated to drainage issues. 852

2.5 Arrival Observations
The team observed arrival along two locations: Perkins Road at “U” Driveway and Perkins Road and Clara Street. There is a crossing guard stationed to improve safety for walking students along Perkins Road. The “U” driveway was chosen as Principal Peña mentioned to be a bus hub that creates more traffic
General Observations
- The crossing guard at the school has a good relationship with the students but needs additional support. Notably, the crossing guard is absent from 8:10 AM to 8:22 AM. Additionally, the “U” driveway on the school property near the intersection of Alley and Perkins Road is designated for staff use, but the signage in that area should be improved. There are lots of speeders on the street alley.

Perkins Road and Clara Street
- Many students walk to school, approaching each crosswalk from all directions. - Some parents drop off the students and walk in along Clara Street. - Police are ticketing the cars that parents that are parked along the ”no parking” lane. - There are gates available in Southwinds Park that could be used as another point of entry with supervision.
- Parking for drop-offs could be conned off to prevent parking. - There are students waiting for the bus on grass area.

Perkins Road U-turn between the Alley & Clara Street
- U-turns are permitted for busses only with signs and cones - People are dropping off in the U-turn lane.
- There are no signs that inform parents that they cannot drop off in that area. - There are cars double parking south bound at 7:52 AM
- There are a few U- turns being performed along Perkins Road. - There is a high-walking mode share in the area.
- There are narrow sidewalks that cut through the parking lot. - The school staff are still arriving at 8:00 AM and there are students cutting through the parking lot.
853
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Blackstock Junior High School (6-8)
Prepared By:
854

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Bard Road and Yucca Street within a quarter-mile radius of Charles Blackstock Junior High. Additionally, collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age were concentrated along Bard Road. There were three severe injury collisions within the study area and all of them occurred along Bard Road.
855
Within the study area, there were two pedestrian collisions and five bike collisions. Pedestrian collisions happened along San Juan Avenue and Percy Street. Bike collisions concentrated along Yucca Street and Bard Road.
856
Collisions within the study area were predominantly concentrated along Bard Road, where incidents involving individuals under the age of 16 also occurred frequently. None of these collisions resulted in fatalities. There were three severe injury collisions recorded, all along Bard Road, with violation reasons identified as failure to Automobile Right of Way and Improper Turning.
857

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 29 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of Charles Blackstock Junior High. The study area recorded three severe injury collisions and none of the collisions resulted in fatality. All the severe injury collisions were along Bard Road. The violation reasons included Automobile Right of Way and Improper Turning.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (21%), Traffic Signals and Signs (21%), and Improper Turning (14%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions were prevalent along Bard Road and Frontier Street. • Traffic Signals and Signs collisions highly concentrated at the intersection of Bard Road and San Jua Avenue.
• Improper Turning collisions were spatially spread within the study area. 858
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Charles Blackstock Junior High (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 29
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 3 (10%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 13 (45%) (KSI: 1 – 33% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 2 (7%) (KSI: 0 –0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 5 (17%) (KSI: 1 – 33% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 6 21%
Traffic Signals and Signs 6 21%
Improper Turning 4 14%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 15 52%
Head-On 6 21%
Rear End 3 10%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 7 24%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 7 24%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 9 31%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 6 21%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 6 21%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 22 76%
Dusk/Dawn 1 3%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 1 3%
No 27 93%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
859
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Bard Road 16
Traffic Signals and Signs (5)
Pedestrian Right of Way (3)
Improper Turning (3)
Automobile Right of Way (3)
Nearly half of the collisions within
the study area occurred during
daylight hours. On Bard Road, there
were three severe injury collisions.

Two of these occurred near Justin
Way; one involved an individual
under the age of 16 and a bicyclist,
with violations including failure to
yield the right of way and improper
turning. The other severe injury
collision occurred near San Simeon
Avenue, with the cause attributed to
improper turning.

Yucca Street 5 Improper Turning (2)
All of the collisions happened at
night. Two of the five collisions
involved bicyclists.
860

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
861
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign 59 79%
Speeding9 12%
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard7 11%
862

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Cara Comstock, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• There are existing safety issues with students cutting through the parking lot from Bard Road.
• The southwest corner of the school is used as an entrance by 6th graders; the southeast corner is used as an entrance by 7th and 8th graders.
• There are issues with the bi-directional traffic on Donner Street. • A flashing beacon is being added at the intersection of Justin Way and Bard Road. 863

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Monday, December 16, 2024
Start time: 8:45 AM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Miguel Guillen – City of Oxnard

2. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

3. Danielle Caparas – Fehr & Peers
864

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Saviers Road

2.3.1 Saviers Rd, Justin Way and Johnson Rd

2.3.1.1 There is no sidewalk on the south side and sidewalk uplift was observed on the north side; it is recommended to reconstruct the sidewalk and address the 3-inch uplift to create a continuous and safe path.

Justin Way

2.3.2 Justin Way and Johnson Rd

2.3.2.1 Driver right-of-way confusion was observed at Justin and Johnson; it is recommended to install an all-way stop control (AWSC), construct new curb ramps, and add slow curve markings to clarify movements.

2.3.2.2 There is no curb ramp at Nilan; it is recommended to install a cut curb ramp to improve accessibility.

2.3.2.3 U-turns were observed at the park entrance; it is recommended to install red curbs and add no parking signs to discourage unsafe maneuvers.

2.3.2.4 There is no east-west crosswalk on the west and south legs at Justin and Johnson; it is recommended to stripe new crosswalks on both legs to support safer pedestrian crossings.

2.3.2.5 The centerline at Justin and Johnson is unclear; it is recommended to break the centerline and add slow curve markings to guide vehicles.

2.3.2.6 There is no paved pedestrian path through the park connecting to the southwest corner of the school; it is recommended to install an asphalt or concrete trail to provide a safe walking route.

East-West Streets
Donner Street

2.3.3 Donner Street and San Juan Ave

2.3.3.1 A new crosswalk and ADA-compliant path are needed; it is recommended to install a new crosswalk and curb ramp to support safer pedestrian crossings.

2.3.3.2 The south sidewalk is cluttered and blocked; it is recommended to widen the sidewalks and improve curb transitions for better pedestrian access.

2.3.3.3 Visibility issues for vehicles exiting driveways were observed; it is recommended to install warning signage or remove one to two parking spaces to improve sight distance.

2.3.3.4 U-turns at the north end of the driveway create unsafe conditions; it is recommended to install additional flex posts to discourage unsafe turning movements. 865
Bard Road

2.3.4 Bard Rd, San Juan Ave, and Johnson Rd

2.3.4.1 The sidewalk is too narrow, and cars are stopping in the buffer lanes; it is recommended to widen the sidewalk and install bollards or delineators to protect pedestrians.

2.3.4.2 Compliance with the school speed limit signage is low; it is recommended to install a flashing beacon or more reflective signage to enhance driver awareness.

2.3.5 Bard Rd and San Juan Ave

2.3.5.1 The sidewalks are narrow and cluttered with obstructions; it is recommended to widen the sidewalks and trim adjacent vegetation or obstructions.

2.3.5.2 The sidewalks are narrow and obstructed by landscaping; it is recommended to conduct landscaping code enforcement to clear pedestrian pathways.

Columbia Drive

2.3.6 Columbia Dr and San Juan Ave

2.3.6.1 The school speed limit signs show low compliance; it is recommended to consider adding illumination to improve driver awareness and compliance.

Avalon Way

2.3.7 Avalon Way and San Juan Ave

2.3.7.1 The northeast and southeast corners lack ADA-compliant ramps; it is recommended to install new curb ramps at both corners to meet accessibility standards.

Yucca Street

2.3.8 Yucca Street and San Juan Ave

2.3.8.1 Vehicles are parked up to the stop sign, limiting sight distance; it is recommended to install red curb or consider adding curb extensions to improve visibility.

2.3.8.2 The stop signs are small and difficult to see; it is recommended to replace them with fullsize stop signs to enhance visibility and driver compliance.

2.3.8.3 Vehicles are parked too close to the stop sign, limiting sight distance; it is recommended to install red curb or consider adding curb extensions at the intersection.

2.3.8.4 The existing curb ramps require upgrades, and the crosswalk striping is faded; it is recommended to upgrade the ramps and refresh the high-visibility crosswalk striping.

2.3.9 Yucca Street and Las Tunas Place

2.3.9.1 Landscaping near the signage blocks views; it is recommended to trim or relocate the landscaping to maintain clear sight lines for drivers and pedestrians.

2.3.10 Yucca Street and Fournier Street

2.3.10.1 The curb ramps at the intersection have not been upgraded; it is recommended to replace them with new ADA-compliant ramps.

2.3.11 Yucca Street and Cloyne Street

2.3.11.1 The intersection has no ADA-compliant curb ramps, and the pavement quality is poor; it is recommended to install new ramps, repave the intersection, and consider adding curb extensions to improve accessibility and safety.
866

2.3.12 Yucca Street and La Costa Place

2.3.12.1 Parking is located too close to the intersection; it is recommended to paint red curbs and consider installing curb extensions to increase visibility and pedestrian safety.

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Saviers Road

2.4.1 Saviers Rd and Johnson Rd

2.4.1.1 The 24-inch stop sign needs replacement; it is recommended to upgrade the ramps and install full-size signage to improve visibility and compliance.

2.4.2 Saviers Rd and Yucca Street

2.4.2.1 Ramp upgrades, improved crosswalk striping, and signage enhancements are needed; it is recommended to complete ADA-compliant ramp upgrades and refresh pavement markings.

2.4.2.2 A new crosswalk is needed in the park connecting to the corner of the school; it is recommended to install a crosswalk with buffered signage and paint a trail connection to provide a safer pedestrian route.

2.4.3 Saviers Rd @ mobile home DW

2.4.3.1 Ramp upgrades are needed; it is recommended to replace the existing ramps to meet accessibility standards.

2.5 Arrival Observations
The team observed arrival at several locations: Justin Way driveway, Justin Way & Bard Road, the Bard Road driveway exit, and Bard Road & San Juan Avenue.

General Observations:
- Students began to arrive around 8:00am; pedestrian arrival period peaked around 8:30am - Vehicle congestion/queuing began at 8:20am
- Students walk through parking lot to get to school entrance; there is a fence providing separation from vehicles along the walking path from the park
Bard Road:
- High speeds observed along Bard during arrival period - Northbound drop-off overflows onto Bard
Justin & Johnson:
- Observed driver confusion at the driveway at Justin & Johnson; not clear who should yield and who has the right of way
867
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Del Sol High School (9-12)
Prepared By:
868

1. Collision and Citation Trends
As the date of this report, Del Sol High School is still under construction and it’s expected to open the campus in the fall 2023. Thus, the collision analysis for Del Sol High School serves as a reference to understanding the collision and citation trend in the area. For detailed collision and citation analysis, please refer to the following neighboring schools:
• Rose Avenue Elementary School
• Rio Rosales Elementary School
Walk audit and field observations will be the main resource for future recommendations around Del Sol High School.
869
870
871

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Assistant Principal Alma Romero-Packham, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• Sidewalks are still being installed, particularly along Camino Del Sol, limiting access for students arriving to school by foot or transit.
• Parents drop off students in the middle of the parking lot on Camino Del Sol and then make a U-turn around the east driveway median. Parents also use the left lane for dropoffs. 872

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2024
Start time: 3:45 PM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: Camino Del Sol was under construction on the day of the walk audit, which likely influenced student behavior after dismissal. We recommend re-auditing the dismissal period once construction is complete.

Attendees:

1. Miguel Guillen – City of Oxnard

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

3. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
873

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Rose Ave

2.3.1 Rose Ave and Jacinto Dr

2.3.1.1 The curb ramps look good; it is recommended to upgrade the crosswalk striping to highvisibility markings to improve pedestrian safety.

East-West Streets
Camino Del Sol Blvd

2.3.2 Camino Del Sol Blvd and Gibraltar Ave

2.3.2.1 The curb ramps look good; it is recommended to upgrade the crosswalk striping to highvisibility markings to improve pedestrian safety.

2.4 Dismissal Observations
The team observed dismissal at two locations: near building A to observe both pick-up/drop-off lanes and at Camino del Sol & Gibraltar/Jaguar to observe traffic operations.

General Observations:
- All students were dismissed at 3:30pm; pedestrians all cleared by 3:40pm and vehicles all cleared by 3:45pm
Camino Del Sol:
- Heavy pedestrian traffic crossed southbound at school entrance to go directly into the residential neighborhood or walk westbound on Camino Del Sol to access apartment buildings further away - Some pedestrians exited eastbound on Camino Del Sol and did not cross - Several bicyclists observed
- Camino Del Sol was under construction at the time of the walk audit; dismissal observations may shift once the construction is complete and new signals are installed Jaguar Way:
- U-turn activity observed on Jaguar
- Some pedestrian activity observed exiting through the gate on Jaguar to head north into the residential neighborhood
874
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
E.O. Green Junior High School (6-8)
Prepared By:
875

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Saviers Road within a quarter-mile radius of E.O. Green Junior High, particularly at the intersection of Yucca Street and Bard Road. Additionally, collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age were concentrated along Saviers Road as well. There was one fatality injury collision and four severe injury collisions within the study area. The fatal collision, which occurred at the intersection of Bard Road and Saviers Road, involved an individual under the age of 16 and a pedestrian, although the violation reason was not determined.
876
Pedestrian and bike collisions within the study area were distributed throughout, with a concentration along Saviers Road.
877
Collisions within the study area were predominantly concentrated along Saviers Road. Many collisions along Saviers Road also involved someone under the age of 16, a pedestrian, or a bicyclist. Within the study area, there was one fatality collision, which occurred at the intersection of Bard Road and Saviers Road.
878

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 109 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of E.O.

Green Junior High. The study area recorded one fatal collision and four severe injury collisions.

Collisions highly concentrated along Saviers Road. The fatal collision, which occurred at the intersection of Bard Road and Saviers Road, involved an individual under the age of 16 and a pedestrian, although the violation reason was not determined.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (28%), Unsafe Speed (15%), and Traffic Signals and Signs (13%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions were spread across the study area with concentration along Saviers Road and Bard Road.
• Unsafe Speed collisions concentrated at the intersection of Saviers Road and Yucca Street.
• Traffic Signals and Signs collisions were also prevalent along Saviers Road, Yucca Street, and Bard Road.
879
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of E.O. Green Junior High (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 109
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 5 (5%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 40 (37%) (KSI: 1 – 20% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 15 (14%) (KSI: 2 – 40% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 5 (5%) (KSI: 1 – 20% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 30 28%
Unsafe Speed 16 15%
Traffic Signals and Signs 14 13%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 44 40%
Rear End 27 25%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 13 12%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 12 11%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 16 15%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 34 31%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 47 43%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 1 1%
Dark – Streetlights 45 41%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 2 2%
Daylight 57 52%
Dusk/Dawn 4 4%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 11 10%
No 97 89%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
880
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Saviers Road 72
Automobile Right of Way (23)
Traffic Signals and Signs (9)
Unsafe Speed (8)
Only one third of the collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

Along Saviers Road, there was one
fatal injury collision at the
intersection with Bard Road, and
two severe injury collisions—one
near Bard Road and another near
Yucca Street. The fatal collision
involved a minor and a pedestrian;
however, the specific violation
leading to this incident remains
unknown. The severe injury
collisions were attributed to
improper turning and improper
passing, respectively.

Saviers Road & Bard Road 42
Automobile Right of Way (17)
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug (5)
Traffic Signals and Signs (5)
Thirty-one of the collisions occurred
at night. At this intersection, there
was one fatal collision and one
severe injury; for details, see above.

More than half of these collisions
involved individuals under the age
of 16. Additionally, three of the
collisions involved pedestrians, and
two involved bicyclists.

Saviers Road and Yucca
Street 21 Unsafe Speed (8)
More than half of the collisions
occurred at night. There was one
severe injury collision in this section;
for details, see above.
881

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
882
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 140 84%
Running Stop Sign 59 14%
Running Red Light4 2%
883

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Assistant Principal Gabriel Covarrubias, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• C Street is typically busy and gets congested. Limited pickup and drop-off areas on the school campus led parents to often stop in the middle of C Street or make illegal Uturns. • In recent years there has been an increase in students being driven to school with a current estimate of 60% of students being dropped off this way. • The attendance boundary is fully west of Saviers Road but extends south of Bard Road. 884

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Monday, December 16, 2024
Start time: 2:45 PM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Assistant Principal Gabriel Covarrubias

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

3. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

4. Danielle Caparas – Fehr & Peers
885

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
F Street

2.3.1 F Street and Yucca Street

2.3.1.1 Only F Street is stop-controlled and there are no crosswalks; it is recommended to convert the intersection to an all-way stop and add at least two crosswalks.

2.3.1.2 The crosswalk signage is set but there are no pavement markings; it is recommended to stripe a new high-visibility yellow school crosswalk at the east leg.

2.3.2 F Street and Zion Ave

2.3.2.1 The intersection has no school zone signage or striping; it is recommended to add a curb extension, install marked crosswalks at the northeast and east legs, and add advanced warning school zone signage.

2.3.2.2 The intersection has no stop control and no crosswalks; it is recommended to add curb cuts, stripe high-visibility crosswalks, install stop signs, and consider curb extensions.

2.3.2.3 The intersection has no crosswalks and no curb ramps on the north side; it is recommended to stripe new crosswalks on the north and east legs, install curb ramps, and consider curb extensions or speed humps per the principal’s request.

2.3.3 F Street and Glacier Ave

2.3.3.1 The intersection has good ramps; it is recommended to upgrade the high-visibility crosswalk striping and add a school zone sign along F Street with advanced warning signage at the west leg.

2.3.3.2 The intersection has crosswalks on the north and south legs but lacks stop control on the east and west legs; it is recommended to install an all-way stop and stripe a high-visibility crosswalk on the west leg.

2.3.4 F Street, Zion Ave, and Francisco Place

2.3.4.1 School zone signage is missing; it is recommended to install school zone signs to alert drivers to the presence of students.

C Street

2.3.5 C Street and Tangerine Place

2.3.5.1 The intersection has no crosswalks and no truncated domes; it is recommended to install crosswalks and add ADA-compliant truncated domes.

2.3.5.2 Ramp upgrades are needed and the stop sign is undersized; it is recommended to replace the stop sign with a standard-size sign and upgrade the curb ramps.

2.3.6 C Street and Vine Place

2.3.6.1 The intersection has no crosswalks and no truncated domes; it is recommended to install crosswalks and add ADA-compliant truncated domes.

2.3.6.2 There is no sidewalk or curb ramp on the west side of Vine; it is recommended to install 886
a sidewalk and ramp for pedestrian access.

2.3.7 C Street and Willow Street

2.3.7.1 The intersection has no crosswalks and no truncated domes; it is recommended to install crosswalks and add ADA-compliant truncated domes.

2.3.8 C Street and Glacier Ave

2.3.8.1 The intersection has no yield triangles at the RRFB-controlled crosswalk; it is recommended to add yield triangles for better driver compliance

2.3.9 C Street and Zion Ave

2.3.9.1 The intersection has no yield triangles at the RRFB-controlled crosswalk; it is recommended to add yield triangles for better driver compliance.

Francisco Place

2.3.10 Francisco Place and Shasta Ave

2.3.10.1 The intersection has good ramps and no stop sign on the side street; it is recommended to add a stop sign to enhance intersection control.

2.3.11 Francisco Place and Zion Ave

2.3.11.1 The intersection has good ramps but no stop control; it is recommended to add a stop sign on Francisco for improved intersection safety.

2.3.11.2 The intersection has no stop sign and lacks a curb ramp on the north side; it is recommended to install a stop sign on the south leg and install curb ramps on both the north and south sides.

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Francisco Place

2.4.1 Francisco Place and Bard Rd

2.4.1.1 The intersection has a striped curb extension and a good crosswalk; it is recommended to consider concrete curb extensions for long-term improvements.

F Street

2.4.2 F Street and Bryce Canyon Ave

2.4.2.1 The intersection needs upgraded ramps; it is recommended to upgrade curb ramps and install a new crosswalk with proper markings at the northeast leg and stripe a crosswalk at the south leg.

2.4.2.2 The intersection has a stop sign at F Street but no truncated domes; it is recommended to add high-visibility crosswalks and upgrade curb ramps.

2.4.2.3 The intersection needs new ramps and has missing crosswalks on both legs; it is recommended to add new curb ramps and stripe new crosswalks on the west and north legs. 887

2.4.2.4 A sidewalk uplift was observed on the east side of F Street south of Bryce Canyon; it is recommended to repair the sidewalk to remove trip hazards.

C Street

2.4.3 C Street and Bryce Canyon Ave

2.4.3.1 The stop sign on the north leg is too small; it is recommended to add an all-way stop, upgrade ramps, and install a high-visibility white crosswalk for better safety.

2.4.3.2 The intersection operates as an all-way stop but has no crosswalks and no truncated domes; it is recommended to add at least two crosswalks and install ADA-compliant truncated domes.

2.4.4 C Street and Rincon Way

2.4.4.1 The sidewalk on the west side of C Street shows uplift, and there are no truncated domes or crosswalks; it is recommended to repair the sidewalk uplift and install truncated domes and crosswalks.

2.4.4.2 There is no sidewalk or curb ramp on the west side of Rincon Way; it is recommended to install a sidewalk and ramp for pedestrian access.

2.4.5 C Street and Bard Rd

2.4.5.1 The intersection has good directional curb ramps; no improvements are recommended for directional access at this location.

2.4.5.2 Landscaping issues were observed on the north side; it is recommended to address the overgrown landscaping to maintain sidewalk clearance.

2.4.5.3 Tree clearance near Florence High School should be evaluated; it is recommended to ensure trees are trimmed to maintain a clear pedestrian pathway.

2.4.5.4 The sidewalk is missing on the north side, and a pole presents a trip hazard; it is recommended to remove the pole and construct a new sidewalk to complete the pedestrian path.

East-West Streets
Bryce Canyon Ave

2.4.6 Bryce Canyon Ave and E Street

2.4.6.1 The intersection has no stop sign and no crosswalk; it is recommended to install a northbound stop sign and stripe a crosswalk.

2.4.6.2 There is no northbound stop control at the south leg; it is recommended to install a threeleg stop control and stripe a new crosswalk. 888

2.5 Dismissal Observations
The team observed dismissal at two locations along C Street, Cascade Avenue and Glacier Avenue. We also observed dismissal along F Street and Zion Avenue.

General Observations:
- All students dismissed at 2:30pm; congestion cleared by 2:42pm C Street:
- Drivers were observed making U-turns on Cascade and C St after picking up their student - Many students observed crossing on foot at Glacier and C St. No crossing guard was present; school administration provided feedback that a crossing guard would be helpful at this location - Northbound traffic on C St queued at stop sign; heavy pedestrian traffic creates longer queues F Street:
- Minor vehicle congestion observed northbound on F St at Glacier 889
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Fred L. Williams Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
890

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Bard Road and East Pleasant Valley Road within a quarter-mile radius of Fred L. Williams Elementary School. Within the study area, there were five severe injury collisions, all of which occurred along Bard Road. The causes of these collisions included issues with automobile right of way, improper turning, and traffic signals and signs. 891
Pedestrian and bike collisions within the study area were distributed throughout, with a concentration along Anchorage Street and South Rose Avenue. 892
Collisions involved someone under the age of 16 highly concentrated along Bard Road, South Rose Avenue, and East Pleasant Valley Road. One of these collisions resulted in severe injury and the reason remained unknown.
893

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 87 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of Fred L.

Williams Elementary School, with collisions heavily concentrated along Bard Road and East Pleasant Valley Road. The study area recorded five severe injury collisions, all of which occurred along Bard Road. The causes of these severe injury collisions included issues with automobile right of way, improper turning, and traffic signals and signs.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (33%), Unsafe Speed (14%), and Improper Turning (9%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions were spread across the study area with concentration along Rose Avenue and Bard Road.
• Unsafe Speed collisions concentrated on Rose Avenue and E Pleasant Valley Road. • Improper turning collisions were also prevalent along Rose Avenue. 894
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Fred L. Williams Elementary School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 87
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 5 (6%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 33 (38%) (KSI: 1 – 20% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 9 (10%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 4 (5%) (KSI: 1 – 20% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 29 33%
Unsafe Speed 12 14%
Improper Turning 8 9%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 39 45%
Rear End 14 16%
Head-On 11 13%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 16 18%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 17 20%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 34 39%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 20 23%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 20 23%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 1 1%
Daylight 60 69%
Dusk/Dawn 5 6%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 8 9%
No 75 86%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
895
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Bard Road 72 Automobile Right of Way (22)
Traffic Signals and Signs (7)
Approximately one third of the
collisions occurred during daylight
hours. Of the 72 collisions, five
resulted in severe injuries. One
involved an individual under the
age of 16, and another involved a
bicyclist. Two of the severe injury
collisions occurred at the
intersection of South Rose Avenue
and Bard Road.

E Pleasant Valley Road 19 Unsafe Speed (7)
Approximately half of the collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

None of the collisions resulted in
severe injuries or fatalities. Around
half (8) of the collisions involved
individuals under the age of 16, and
seven collisions involved
pedestrians.
896

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
897
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign134 86%
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard 21 14%
898

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team performed collision and citation analysis of the surrounding area to Fred L. Williams Elementary. No pre-audit call was made between the team and the school district.

The team learned:
• Injury collisions have occurred at the intersections of Bard & Anchorage and Bard & Rose.
• A youth collision has occurred along Anchorage at a driveway. 899

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Friday, January 17, 2025
Start time: 8:15 AM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

3. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
900

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Anchorage Street

2.3.1 Anchorage St and Billings St

2.3.1.1 The curbs and markings at this intersection need to be upgraded, the stop sign should be replaced with a new full-size version for improved visibility, and the existing crosswalk should be updated to high visibility.

2.3.2 Anchorage St and York St

2.3.2.1 The curbs on the west leg require upgrading, and a minor leg stop sign may be needed on the west leg. A crosswalk at this location could also improve safety.

2.3.3 Anchorage St and Nelson Pl

2.3.3.1 The curb ramps at this intersection need to be upgraded and larger stop signage should be added to enhance visibility and control.

2.3.4 Anchorage St and Monet Pl

2.3.4.1 The sidewalk on the south side, west of Anchorage, is uplifted and requires repair.

Additional curb ramps and a side-street stop control on the west leg are also needed.

Highland Ave

2.3.5 Highland Ave and Yale St

2.3.5.1 Curve markings should be added at this intersection. Additionally, the sidewalk on the north side is uplifted and should be repaired.

Hamilton Ave

2.3.6 Hamilton Ave and Yale St.

2.3.6.1 A side-street stop control is needed on the southeast leg of this intersection. The sidewalks on both the north and south sides are uplifted and require repair.

East-West Streets
Bard Road

2.3.7 Bard Rd and Railroad Crossing

2.3.7.1 There is no clear path of travel across the railroad tracks. Coordination with the railroad may be necessary to resolve crossing issues.

2.3.7.2 There should be a clear path of travel added at this intersection, including a pedestrian crosswalk.

2.3.8 Bard Rd and Anchorage St

2.3.8.1 The bus stop at this intersection has a raised, motorized extension that may need further evaluation to ensure safety and ADA compliance.
901

2.3.8.2 Good ramps and crosswalks were observed at this intersection.

2.3.9 Bard Rd and San Simeon Dr

2.3.9.1 The curb ramps are in good condition, but a midblock crossing located in the middle of the street should be evaluated for alignment and safety.

2.3.10 Bard Rd and Terrace Ave

2.3.10.1 This intersection has good ramps and an existing high visibility crosswalk York Street

2.3.11 York St and Anchorage St

2.3.11.1 A very faded crosswalk was observed on the west leg of the intersection, and a side-street stop sign should be added to improve visibility and traffic control.

2.3.12 York St and Highland Ave

2.3.12.1 The sidewalk is uplifted along the east side of Highland and the north side. The curb ramps are in good condition, but side street stop control, a minor leg stop on the East side, and curve marking are all recommended.

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Terrace Ave

2.4.1 Terrace Ave and Bard Rd

2.4.1.1 The bus stop at this intersection lacks amenities, and the sidewalk on the south side is narrow. Improvements are needed to enhance both bus stop access and sidewalk width.

2.4.2 Terrace Ave and Yale St

2.4.2.1 The stop sign at this intersection is small, it is recommended to replace it with a larger stop sign and upgrade the curb ramps.

Terrace Drive

2.4.3 Terrace Dr and Monet Pl

2.4.3.1 The curb ramps at this intersection need to be upgraded, and a side-street stop control should be added at the east leg.

2.4.4 Terrace Dr and Nelson Pl

2.4.4.1 The bus stop at this intersection lacks amenities, and the sidewalk on the south side is narrow. Improvements are needed to enhance both bus stop access and sidewalk width.

2.4.4.2 Sidewalk uplift was observed at this intersection; it is recommended to repair the sidewalk and add slow curve markings.
902
East-West Streets
York Street

2.4.5 York St and Highland Ave

2.4.5.1 The sidewalk is uplifted along the east side of Highland and the north side. The curb ramps are in good condition, but side street stop control, a minor leg stop on the East side, and curve marking are all recommended.

2.4.6 York St and Hamilton Ave

2.4.6.1 Sidewalk uplift was observed on the north and south sides, W/O Hamilton; it is recommended to repair the sidewalk and add side street stop control

2.4.7 York St and Terrace Ave

2.4.7.1 The stop sign at this intersection is small and should be replaced with a standard-size version, and the ramps should be upgraded.

2.5 Arrival Observations
The team observed arrival at two locations: Anchorage Street & Bard Road and Anchorage Street & the southwest driveway corner.

General Observations:
- Arrival traffic peaked at 7:50am; cleared by about 8:00am - Team observed older students walking younger students to school Anchorage Street:
- Crossing guard observed at Bard & Anchorage; mostly crossing students across Bard - Middle and high school students from nearby schools were also observed crossing through Bard & Anchorage
- Park & walk activity observed along Anchorage
- Queue formed northbound on Anchorage as a result of activity at Bard & Anchorage 903
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Hollywood Beach Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
904

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Harbor Boulevard within a quarter-mile radius of Hollywood Beach Elementary School. There was one severe injury collision within the study area, occurring at the intersection of Channel Islands Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard. None of the collisions resulted in fatalities.
905
Within the study area, there was one bicycle collision, which occurred at the intersection of Channel Islands Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard. None of the collisions involved pedestrians. 906
Collisions within the study area were predominantly concentrated along Harbor Boulevard, with none resulting in fatalities. There was one severe injury collision at the intersection of Channel Islands Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard. Additionally, one collision involved an individual under the age of 16, occurring at the intersection of Mandalay Beach Road and Harbor Boulevard. 907

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 14 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of Hollywood Beach Elementary School. There was one severe injury collision that occurred within the study and none of the collisions resulted in fatality. The injury collisions highly concentrated along Harbor Boulevard.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug (29%), Unsafe Speed (29%), and Improper Turning (14%).
• Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug collisions concentrated at the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Channel Island Boulevard. • Unsafe Speed collisions were prevalent along Harbor Boulevard. • Improper Turning collisions were prevalent along Harbor Boulevard as well. 908
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Hollywood Beach Elementary School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 14
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 1 (7%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 2 (14%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions)
Pedestrian-Involved 0 (0%) (KSI: 0 –0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 1 (7%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
4 29%
Unsafe Speed 4 29%
Improper Turning 2 14%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Rear End 6 43%
Broadside 3 21%
Hit Object 2 14%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 1 7%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 3 21%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 3 21%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 7 50%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 5 36%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 8 57%
Dusk/Dawn 0 0%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 4 29%
No 10 71%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
909
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Harbor Boulevard 13
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
(4)
Unsafe Speed (4)
More than half of the collisions
occurred at night. One collision
involved a bicyclist, and none
involved pedestrians. There was one
severe injury collision at the
intersection of Harbor Boulevard
and Channel Islands Boulevard,
caused by unsafe speed.

Harbor Boulevard & Channel
Island Boulevard 7 Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug (4) Six out of the seven collisions
occurred at night. More than half of
these collisions were due to driving
or bicycling under the influence of
alcohol or drugs.
910

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
911
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign 15 100%
912

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Monica Shallenberger, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• Enrollment is low with only 280 students attending and most are from school of choice.

Very limited enrollment from around the neighborhood.
• Peninsula Road & Silver Strand students are bussed into school. • A crossing guard helps students at the Southeast corner of Sunset/Channel Islands. • The existing recommendation is to park along Harbor Blvd and walk to school. 913

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Thursday, November 7, 2024
Start time: 8:15 AM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Miguel Guillen – City of Oxnard

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

3. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
914

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Sunset Lane

2.3.1 Sidewalk along Sunset Lane

2.3.1.1 The sidewalk south of the school has a hole and needs repair; it is recommended to add bollards and fix the sidewalk.

2.3.2 Drive Sunset Lane and School Entrance

2.3.2.1 The crosswalk is questionable near the RRFB placement and there is no sidewalk connection; it is recommended to add detectable warning dots to the sidewalk and connect it to the existing pedestrian path.

2.3.3 Sunset Lane and Channel Islands Blvd

2.3.3.1 There are clear path-of-travel issues along the sidewalk (approximately 30 inches wide); it is recommended to move all lamp posts and hydrants to protect the pedestrian path.

2.3.4 Sunset Lane and Los Altos Street

2.3.4.1 The curb ramps at the intersection are outdated; it is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps.

2.3.5 Sunset Lane and La Brea St

2.3.5.1 There is no clear path of travel on La Brea Street (approximately 30–32 inches wide); it is recommended to complete ADA upgrades to improve accessibility.

2.3.5.2 There are clear width issues on the east side sidewalk; it is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps and replace the stop sign for better visibility and compliance.

2.3.5.3 New curb ramps are needed on the east side; it is recommended to install proper-sized curb ramps and ensure accessible travel paths.

2.3.5.4 The street lighting is low, and the clear pedestrian path along the sidewalk needs improvement; it is recommended to upgrade street lighting and widen or repair the sidewalk.

Harbor Boulevard

2.3.6 Harbor Boulevard and La Brea St

2.3.6.1 New ramps are needed on both the west and east sides; it is recommended to install ADAcompliant curb ramps.

2.3.6.2 The pavement quality is poor at the intersection; it is recommended to upgrade the sidewalk surface and repair broken pavement sections.

2.3.6.3 The intersection requires restriping and installation of new stop signs; it is recommended to repaint lane markings and add signage as needed.

2.3.7 Harbor Boulevard and Channel Islands Blvd

2.3.7.1 A speed sign showing 40 miles per hour was observed; it is recommended to review speed limits near the school and ensure proper signage placement.

2.3.7.2 A new crosswalk near the RRFB (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon) was observed; it is recommended to confirm whether the crosswalk should be painted yellow for increased visibility. 915
East-West Streets
Channel Islands Boulevard

2.3.8 Channel Islands Blvd and Harbor Blvd

2.3.8.1 A school zone needs to be added; it is recommended to install a school zone sign and a speed limit sign closer to the intersection for better driver awareness.

2.3.8.2 A 25 miles per hour school zone sign is located too far from the intersection; it is recommended to relocate the 25 mph sign closer to the school entrance near Channel Islands Boulevard

2.3.9 Channel Islands Blvd and Sunset Lane

2.3.9.1 Ramp upgrades are needed at all corners, particularly where ramps are not currently ADAcompliant; it is recommended to install new ADA-compliant curb ramps.

2.3.9.2 Good safety signage and crosswalks were observed, but ramp conditions need improvement; it is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps and re-stripe the crosswalks to improve visibility and compliance.

2.3.9.3 A new stop bar and squared-up curb ramp are needed at the northeast corner; it is recommended to stripe a new stop bar and reconstruct the curb ramp for proper alignment.

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Sunset Lane

2.4.1 Sunset Lane and Los Feliz Drive

2.4.1.1 The street lighting is low, and the clear pedestrian path along the sidewalk needs improvement; it is recommended to upgrade street lighting and widen or repair the sidewalk. The sidewalk along Los Feliz Drive is uplifted; it is recommended to repair the sidewalk.

Harbor Boulevard

2.4.2 Harbor Boulevard General Observation

2.4.2.1 Some empty tree wells and a narrow bike lane were observed; it is recommended to repair or replant trees and widen the bike lane where feasible.

2.4.3 Harbor Boulevard and Los Feliz Drive

2.4.3.1 New curb ramps are needed at the intersection; it is recommended to install ADAcompliant curb ramps to improve accessibility.

2.4.3.2 A 40 miles per hour speed limit sign was observed; it is recommended to install school zone signage and lower the speed limit as appropriate for the school area.

2.4.3.3 The west side sidewalk is uplifted in a few areas; it is recommended to repair the sidewalk and address tree root issues causing damage.
916

2.5 Arrival Observations
The team observed arrival at two locations along Channel Islands Boulevard, Sunset Lane and the existing school parking lot.

General Observations:
- Arrival activity began at 7:40am, peaking around 7:55am; all activity cleared just after 8:00am - Drop-off zone working well; volunteer staffing is effective at keeping the queue moving while exiting the students safely from the vehicle
- Younger kids were observed walking unaccompanied, indicating a strong walk-to-school culture and parent/guardian comfort with the environment
Channel Islands Boulevard:
- Some students observed crossing mid-block on Channel Islands Blvd and Sunset Ln 917
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Julien Hathaway Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
918

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Saviers Road and Pleasant Valley Road within the study area.

Additionally, collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age were concentrated along Saviers Road and Pleasant Valley Road. There were three fatal collisions and 17 severe injury collisions within the study area. Two of the three fatal collisions involved someone under the age of 16. One occurred at the intersection of Bard Road and Saviers Road due to unsafe speed, while the other took place at the intersection of Pleasant Valley Road and Saviers Road, but the cause of this fatality remains unknown.
919
Pedestrian and bicycle collisions were spread out within the study area, with concentrations along Saviers Road and East Pleasant Valley Road.
920
Putting all the information together, collisions within the study area were concentrated along Saviers Road, Pleasant Valley Road and Bard Road. Nearly half of the KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured) collisions involved someone under the age of 16, and more than one-third involved a pedestrian. The KSI collisions were particularly concentrated along Saviers Road and Pleasant Valley Road.
921

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 137 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of Julien Hathaway Elementary School. The study area recorded three fatal collisions and 17 severe injury collisions. The majority of the Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI) collisions occurred along Pleasant Valley Road or Saviers Road, with Unsafe Speed being the top violation contributing to these KSI collisions.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (34%), Unsafe Speed (12%), and Traffic Signals and Signs (11%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions were concentrated along Bard Road, particularly at the intersection of Bard Road and Saviers Road.
• Unsafe Speed collisions were distributed throughout the study area but concentrated along Saviers Road.
• Traffic Signals and Signs collisions were also prevalent along Saviers Road. 922
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Julien Hathaway Elementary School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 137
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 20 (15%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 45 (33%) (KSI: 9 – 45% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 19 (14%) (KSI: 7 – 35% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 10 (7%) (KSI: 3 – 15% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 46 34%
Unsafe Speed 17 12%
Traffic Signals and Signs 15 11%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 63 46%
Rear End 29 21%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 17 12%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 23 17%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 24 18%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 36 26%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 54 39%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 2 1%
Dark – Streetlights 51 37%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 1 1%
Daylight 75 55%
Dusk/Dawn 8 6%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 14 10%
No 122 89%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
923
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Pleasant Valley Road 58
Automobile Right of Way (16)
Unsafe Speed (11)
Traffic Signals and Signs (9)
Nearly one third of the collisions
happened during daylight hours.

There were 13 KSI collisions along
Pleasant Valley Road, two of which
resulted in fatalities. Four KSI
collisions took place at the
intersection of Pleasant and Cloyne
Street, and seven occurred at the
intersection of Saviers Road and
Pleasant Valley Road.

Pleasant Valley Road & Cloyne
Street 9 Pedestrian Violation (2)
At this intersection, there were three
severe injury collisions and one fatal
collision. All these collisions
involved pedestrians, with the fatal
collision resulting from a pedestrian
violation.

Pleasant Valley Road & Saviers
Road 28 Automobile Right of Way (6)
Injury collisions highly concentrated
at this intersection. Seven of the 28
collisions were KSI collisions. The
fatality collision at this intersection
happened on the morning, involved
a pedestrian and was due to Unsafe
Speed.

Saviers Road 86
Automobile Right of Way (19)
Unsafe Speed (11)
Traffic Signals and Signs (10)
Thirty of the 86 collisions occurred
during daylight hours. Along Saviers
Road, there were two fatality
collisions and eight severe injury
collisions. One fatality collision
occurred at the intersection of
Saviers Road and Bard Road, but
the contributing factor remains
unknown. The other fatality, which
occurred at the intersection of
Saviers Road and Pleasant Road,
has been discussed previously.
924

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
925
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 173 52%
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard 118 35%
Running Stop Sign 40 12%
Running Red Light 4 1%
926
• Most students live in the surrounding neighborhood. Approximately 90% of students walk to school while the remaining few students ride bikes or skateboards. Bus services are provided for students with special needs. • Key locations include: Dollie Street (bus and staff parking lot entrances), Saviers Road & Dollie Street (crossing guard location)
• Key issues include: limited drop off spaces, high vehicle speeds

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Thomas Beneke, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
927

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Thursday, May 16, 2024
- Start time: 7:30 PM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
928

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Cloyne Street

2.3.1 Cloyne Street & Alley

2.3.1.1 There is a ladder crosswalk on the eastern leg of the intersection

2.3.1.2 The crosswalks on all legs are standard. The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which
should be added for accessibility.

2.3.1.3 Parked cars were observed up to the intersection, limiting visibility of pedestrians in the
crosswalk (Figure 3).

East-West Streets
Dollie Street

2.3.2 Dollie Street & Petit Drive

2.3.2.1 There is a ladder crosswalk on the eastern leg of the intersection. A crosswalk across Petit Drive is recommended for pedestrian visibility.

2.3.2.2 The sidewalk narrows into a pinch point at the alley.

2.3.2.3 The current sign posts do not provide a clear route.

2.3.3 Dollie Street & Cloyne Street

2.3.3.1 The crosswalks on all sides are standard and should be upgraded to high-visibility crosswalks.

2.3.3.2 The curb cuts/ramps are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.3.3.3 Curb extensions are recommended to reduce the crossing distance.

2.3.4 Dollie Street & Alley

2.3.4.1 It is recommended to upgrade the ramps and pavement to ensure ADA compliance.

2.3.5 Dollie Street & School Frontage

2.3.5.1 It is recommended to replace the faded parking signs. 929

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Cloyne Street

2.4.1 Cloyne Street & Percy Street

2.4.1.1 There are no stop sign controls or crosswalks at this intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control.

2.4.1.2 The curb cuts/ramps are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.4.1.3 Daylighting at the intersection with red curbs is recommended to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.2 Cloyne Street & Justin Way

2.4.2.1 The curb cuts/ramps are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.4.2.2 There are no crosswalks at this intersection. It is recommended to add crosswalks on the south and west leg of the intersection to get to Bard Road.

Clover Drive

2.4.3 Clover Drive & Alley

2.4.3.1 It is recommended to upgrade the ramps and pavement to ensure ADA compliance.

Petit Drive

2.4.4 Petit Drive & Alleys

2.4.4.1 It is recommended to upgrade the ramps and pavement to ensure ADA compliance.

2.4.5 Petit Drive & Helena Way

2.4.5.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.6 Petit Drive & Andrea Drive

2.4.6.1 There are no markings indicating to reduce speeds at the curve. It is recommended to install slow curve markings and street signs to alert drivers. 930
Saviers Road

2.4.7 Saviors Road between Dollie Street and Bryce Canyon Avenue

2.4.7.1 A lane reduction is recommended to maintain the bike lanes and parking on the east side.

B Street

2.4.8 B Street & Rosa Street

2.4.8.1 There is a stop control on B Street with a small stop sign, which should be replaced with a larger one for better visibility.

2.4.8.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

2.4.8.3 Curb extensions or medians are recommended to reduce the crossing distance.

2.4.8.4 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

C Street

2.4.9 C Street & Rosa Street

2.4.9.1 There are no crosswalks at this intersection. It is recommended to add crosswalks on the south leg of the intersection.

2.4.10 C Street & Van Ness Avenue

2.4.10.1 There is a ladder crosswalk on the northern leg of the intersection and a standard crosswalk on the western leg. It is recommended for the standard crosswalk to be upgraded to a high visibility crosswalk.

East-West Streets
Justin Way

2.4.11 Justin Way & Bard Road

2.4.11.1 A rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) was removed when the street was resurfaces and the intersection needs a new control.

2.4.12 Justin Way & Clover Drive

2.4.12.1 There are no crosswalks at this intersection. It is recommended to add a crosswalk across Clover Drive.

2.4.12.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.
931

2.4.12.3 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.12.4 There is a stop control on Clover Drive with a small stop sign, which should be replaced with a larger one for better visibility.

Dollie Street

2.4.13 Dollie Street between Saviers Road & Justin Way

2.4.13.1 Posted speed limit signs are needed. School zone speed limit signs are also needed.

2.4.14 Dollie Street & Bradfield Place

2.4.14.1 Curb extensions or medians are recommended to reduce the crossing distance.

2.4.15 Dollie Street & Refsing Place

2.4.15.1 Curb extensions or medians are recommended to reduce the crossing distance.

2.4.15.2 Landscaping is obstructing the view of the stop sign for drivers approaching the intersection.

2.4.16 Dollie Street & Saviers Road

2.4.16.1 Curb extensions or medians are recommended to reduce the crossing distance.

2.4.16.2 It is recommended to restripe the crosswalk on the northern leg and install signals at the intersection.

2.4.17 Dollie Street & A Street

2.4.17.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.17.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

2.4.17.3 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.18 Dollie Street & B Street

2.4.18.1 Curb extensions or medians are recommended to reduce the crossing distance. 932

2.5 Arrival Observations
The team observed arrival at two locations: Dollie Street & Petit Drive and Dollie Street & Cloyne Street. These locations were chosen because Principal Thomas Beneke mentioned that they experience key transportation issues during arrival, with peak congestion occurring from approximately 7:35 to 8:05 a.m.

General Observations:
- The school has entrances facing Dollie Street, near the staff and bus parking lot. - At 7:45 a.m., the crossing guard is stationed at Saviers Road and Dollie Street, with a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) in use.
- Many middle school students from Charles F. Blackstock Junior High School are walking near the elementary school.
- The gates open early, and students begin arriving at 7:20 a.m.

Dollie Street & Petit Drive:
- The RRFB at Petit Drive is actively used by families and children walking alone. - There are many families walking up Dollie Street in both directions. - The drop-off lane is double-parked in the westbound direction. - Some pedestrians are entering through the gate to Fashion Park. - A large group of parents is waiting in the front plaza. - Most parents are patient when getting out of line, and the situation began to clear up by 8:05 a.m.
- There was light late drop-off activity through 8:10 a.m.

Dollie Street & Cloyne Street:
- There is no parking or student drop-off sign, and kids are crossing through the loop driveway.
- There is a lot of pedestrian activity at the intersection. - The intersection has red curbs to daylight the area, but cars were parked in it. - There was no crossing guard at the intersection, but pedestrian compliance in the crosswalk was generally good.
- There is a midblock crossing across Cloyne Street.
- Cars on Dollie Street start to back up around 7:55 a.m., but there is plenty of space available on Cloyne Street, both southbound and northbound. - The walk/drive mode share is about 50/50, and some non-school vehicles are passing by. 933
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Laguna Vista Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
934

1. Collision and Citation Trends
The school is located fully outside the City of Oxnard; therefore, no data was available to conduct a collision or citation analysis.
935

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
The team did not conduct a pre-walk audit call for Laguna Vista Elementary School. 936

2.2 Walk Audit Details
Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Thursday, January 16, 2025
Start time: 8:45 AM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

3. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
937

2.3 Arrival Observations
The team observed arrival at two locations along Etting Road, Wood Road and the school parking lot.

General Observations:
- Gates open at 7:30am; school buses arrive between 7:30am-7:45am - Arrival traffic began to accumulate around 8:00am
- Late arrivals continued through 8:45am
- No congestion observed
938
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Mar Vista Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
939

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Pleasant Valley Road within the study area. Collisions concentrated at the intersections of Pleasant Valley Road with Beaumont Avenue (east of the study area's edge)1 and Oxnard Boulevard (west edge of the study area). Collisions involving individuals under the age of 16 were also largely clustered along Pleasant Valley Road. None of these collisions resulted in fatalities or severe injuries. 1 Please refer to Ocean View Junior High Collision Report for more details on collisions at the intersections of Pleasant Valley Road with Beaumont Avenue
940
Pedestrian collisions concentrated along Pleasant Valley Road as well. There were no bike collisions within the study area.
941
Putting all the information together, collisions concentrated along Pleasant Valley Road. None of the collisions resulted in fatalities or severe injuries. 942

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 10 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Mar Vista Elementary School. None of the collisions resulted in fatalities or severe injuries. Half of the collisions were due to Automobile Right of Way.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (50%) and Unsafe Speed (20%). • Automobile Right of Way collisions occurred primarily along Pleasant Valley Road.
• Unsafe Speed collisions concentrated along Pleasant Valley Road as well. 943
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Mar Vista Elementary School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 10
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 0 (0%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 2 (20%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions)
Pedestrian-Involved 2 (20%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 0 (0%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 5 50%
Unsafe Speed 2 20%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 3 30%
Head-On 3 30%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 2 20%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 5 50%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 0 0%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 2 20%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 3 30%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 4 40%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 5 50%
Dusk/Dawn 1 10%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 1 10%
No 9 90%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
944
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Pleasant Valley Boulevard 9 Automobile Right of Way (5) Approximately half of the collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

None of these incidents resulted in
fatalities or severe injuries. Two of
the collisions involved individuals
under the age of 16, and two others
involved pedestrians.
945

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
946
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 14 100%
947

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Antoinette Dodge, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• Many students are bussed in from further neighborhoods. There are a limited number of neighborhoods within the walkshed around the school. • The team should observe new improvements along Etting Road (utilization, congestion, etc.)
948

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
Start time: 8:00 AM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Miguel Guillen – City of Oxnard

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

3. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
949

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

East-West Streets
Etting Road

2.3.1 Etting Road and School Entrance

2.3.1.1 The pedestrian gate was locked during drop-off time; it is recommended to regrade the ramp and keep the pedestrian gate unlocked during arrival and dismissal times to allow safer access.

2.3.2 Etting Road and Mobile Home Park Entrance

2.3.2.1 The southwest mobile home park gate was locked; it is recommended to ensure the pedestrian entrance is unlocked to provide access to the school.

2.3.2.2 Visibility is a concern on the southwest corner due to very high parking density on the east side; it is recommended to add no-parking signage along the curb and bike lane, and to enhance bike lane signage.

2.3.3 Etting Road and End of Sidewalk

2.3.3.1 The sidewalk ends abruptly with no crosswalk leading toward the school; it is recommended to add a midblock crosswalk to improve pedestrian access.

2.3.4 Etting Road and Olds Road

2.3.4.1 Good curb ramps and a good crosswalk are present; it is recommended to consider adding additional pedestrian safety features, such as signage or curb extensions, to strengthen crossing visibility.

2.3.5 Etting Road and E/O Exit Gate

2.3.5.1 Some pedestrian gates are locked, and access is restricted; it is recommended to add a new pedestrian gate in place or allow pedestrian entry during school arrival/dismissal hours.

2.3.5.2 There is potential to close half of the bus gate and add cones, to prevent driving in but allow pedestrian access from the East side.

2.3.5.3 There should be consideration of a new crosswalk to serve pedestrians between exit gates; it is recommended to add a new pedestrian gate in front of the East side.

Gates

2.3.6 First Mobile Home Gate (near Olds Rd)

2.3.6.1 Pedestrian access was locked at the time of observation; it is recommended to ensure that the pedestrian gate remains unlocked during arrival and dismissal periods to facilitate safe access for students.

2.3.6.2 The area would benefit from a new crosswalk and better access to the North side of Etting.

2.3.7 Second Mobile Home Gate (between Olds Rd)

2.3.7.1 People were observed exiting and entering through this gate, approximately 200 feet from the RRFB; it is recommended to create a formalized pedestrian exit and crosswalk to improve safe crossing access near the RRFB.

2.3.8 Third Mobile Home Gate (near Farm Rd)

2.3.8.1 Although an RRFB is present, it is not heavily used due; it is recommended to assess usage 950
patterns and enhance visibility to encourage proper use of the crossing.

2.3.9 School Gate

2.3.9.1 The pedestrian entrance should be relocated to face the 2nd mobile home gate.

2.3.10 Pedestrian Gate

2.3.10.1 This gate provides red access as intended, but leads to trashcans, which could be reorganized.

2.4 Arrival Observations
The team observed arrival at two locations along Etting Road, Olds Road and the school driveway.

General Observations:
- Arrival began at 7:30am; bells at 8:00am and 8:10am
- School opens gates early to allow for early arrivals
- Drop-off line observed to be working well; demand for drop-off exceeds the on-site circulation capacity
Etting Road:
- Vehicle drop-off line backed up into Etting Rd by 7:55am; all clear by 8:00am - Park & walk activity observed along Etting Rd, with parents/guardians stopping or parking in the bike lane and walking their students into school
- Very few pedestrians observed approaching eastbound on Etting Rd Olds Road:
- Westbound at Olds Rd also backed up as vehicles navigated the stop-controlled intersection 951
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Ocean View Junior High School (6-8)
Prepared By:
952

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Pleasant Valley Road with a cluster at the intersection of Pleasant Valley Road and Beaumont Avenue within the study area. Collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age largely clustered along Pleasant Valley Road as well. There was one severe injury collision that occurred at the intersection of Pleasant Valley Road and Beaumont Avenue.
953
Pedestrian collisions concentrated along Pleasant Valley Road as well. There were no bike collisions within the study area.
954
Putting all the information together, there was one severe injury collision present at the intersection of Pleasant Valley Road and Beaumont Avenue. This severe collision did not involve a pedestrian, bicyclist, or someone under the age of 16. 955

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 32 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Ocean View Junior High School. One collision resulted in a severe injury and occurred at the intersection of Pleasant Valley Road and Beaumont Avenue. Most of the collisions occurred along Pleasant Valley Road.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (44%), Unsafe Speed (16%), and Improper Turning (14%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions occurred primarily along Pleasant Valley Road.
• Unsafe Speed collisions occurred primarily along Pleasant Valley Road. • Improper Turning collisions concentrated along Pleasant Valley Road as well. 956
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Ocean View Junior High School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 32
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 1 (3%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 9 (28%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions)
Pedestrian-Involved 2 (6%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 0 (0%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 14 44%
Unsafe Speed 5 16%
Improper Turning 4 13%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 12 38%
Head-On 9 28%
Rear End 6 19%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 6 19%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 5 16%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 6 19%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 15 47%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 15 47%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 15 47%
Dusk/Dawn 2 6%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 2 6%
No 29 91%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
957
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Pleasant Valley Road 28 Automobile Right of Way (14)
Unsafe Speed (5)
Around half of these collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

Nine of these collisions involved
someone under 16 years old. Two
of these collisions involved a
pedestrian.

Pleasant Valley Road and
Beaumont Avenue 8 Automobile Right of Way (3)
There was one severe injury
collision that occurred at the
intersection of Pleasant Valley Road
and Beaumont Avenue due to
automobile right of way at night.

None of the collisions happened in
the intersection involved a
pedestrian or bicyclist.
958

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
959
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 14 21%
Running Stop Sign 52 79%
960
• Most students live in the surrounding neighborhood. Approximately 100 students come from outside the attendance area through inter-district transfers. Seven buses transport students, serving about 250 out of the 750 enrolled. Bus services are also provided to Point Mugu Base for inter-district transfers. Additionally, many students bike or walk to school. • Key locations include: Etting Road & Olds Road (crossing guard location, North Olds Road & Parking Lot (parking lot entrance & rectangular rapid flashing beacon location)
• Key issues include: lack of bike lanes on Etting Road east of Olds Road, wrong way bike riding on Etting Road, lack of sidewalks

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Denise Adams, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
961

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2024
- Start time: 3:00 PM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Principal Denise Adams – Ocean View

2. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

3. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

4. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
962

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Olds Road

2.3.1 Olds Road & Etting Road (South) at Driveway

2.3.1.1 There are no curb and sidewalk extensions near the driveway. It is recommended to relocate the crosswalk south of the driveway entrance.
963

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Olds Road

2.4.1 Olds Road & Walden Street

2.4.1.1 There is an unmarked crosswalk on the west leg of the intersection. It is recommended to upgrade the curbs and tighten the curb radius.

2.4.2 Olds Road & Sanford Street

2.4.2.1 There is an unmarked crosswalk on the west side of the intersection. It is recommended to upgrade the curbs and tighten the curb radius.

2.4.2.2 This is where the Class II bike lane begins to the north of Olds Road and ends to the south of the road.

2.4.3 Olds Road between Sanford Street & Etting Road

2.4.3.1 There are no speed limit signs posted along the segment.

2.4.3.2 There are sidewalk uplifts on both sides of the road. It is recommended to repair the sidewalks and add more school zone signs. Additionally, implementing a "gateway" treatment at the south end would help transition to a slower or faster speed zone, depending on the direction of travel. This could involve installing curb extensions at the entrance to a residential or low-speed street.

East-West Streets
Etting Road

2.4.4 Etting Road between Olds Road & Oxnard County Line

2.4.4.1 There are plans for a creek that will connect to the southwest corner of the mobile home park.

964

2.5 Dismissal Observations
The team observed student dismissals at two locations: Etting Road & Olds Road and Olds Road & the parking lot entrance. Crossing guards are stationed at these intersections to enhance safety for students walking to school. Etting Road was selected because Principal Adams noted that many cyclists ride in the wrong direction, and this intersection marks the end of the Class II bike lane. Olds Road was chosen due to the presence of a crosswalk and a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) near the school parking lot entrance.

General Observations:
- The school has entrances and a main parking lot facing Olds Road. The parking lot has a designated driveway for entering and another for exiting. To reach Olds Road and parking lot crosswalk, students must cross the driveway entrance and often cut corners. There is also a lack of sidewalks.

Etting Road/Olds Road:
- Pick-up parked queue started forming at 3:10 PM.
- There are cars double parked south of Olds Road and there is a U-turn made. - Cars are double parked in front of the school district’s entrance. - The cross guard is out at 3:20 PM. At the left turn out there is no crossing guard at the exit of the driveway.
- Traffic begins to move at 3:25 PM and there is a huge cluster of walkers both north and south.
- At the driveway, left turns block throughs at the driveway causing backups on Olds Road north bound to Etting Road.
- Buses are seen at 3:25PM and they platoon out.

Olds Road/Parking Lot Entrance:
- At 3:07 south bound traffic started to accumulate. Cars that are seen traveling north are queuing, U-turning, or double parking.
- Three school staff members manage the flow of traffic on foot. - To provide space for the kids to wait to cross it would be good to remove the bush behind the yellow gate. Staff agree that a crosswalk at the south entrance would be easier. 965
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Oxnard Adult School (12+)
Prepared By:
966

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along North Ventura Road within a quarter-mile radius of Oxnard Adult School, particularly at the intersection of North Ventura Road and West 2nd Street. The study area recorded one fatal collision and one severe injury collision. The fatal collision occurred on North Ventura Road, with the cause remaining unknown. The severe injury collision took place at the intersection of North Ventura Road and West 2nd Street, caused by issues related to traffic signals and signs.
967
Pedestrian and bike collisions within the study area were distributed throughout, with a concentration along North Ventura Road and West 2nd Street. 968
Collisions involving individuals under the age of 16 were highly concentrated along North Ventura Road. None of these collisions resulted in fatalities or severe injuries. 969

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 48 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of Oxnard Adult School. The study area recorded one fatal collision and one severe injury collision.

Collisions highly concentrated along North Ventura Road. The fatal collision occurred on North Ventura Road, with the cause remaining unknown. The severe injury collision took place at the intersection of North Ventura Road and West 2nd Street, caused by issues related to traffic signals and signs.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (27%), Unsafe Speed (23%), and Traffic Signals and Signs (13%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions were spread across the study area with concentration along North Ventura Road.
• Unsafe Speed collisions concentrated on 2nd Street and Ventura Road. • Traffic Signals and Signs collisions were also prevalent along Ventura Road. 970
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Oxnard Adult School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 48
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 2 (4%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 15 (37%) (KSI: 1 – 50% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 6 (14%) (KSI: 1 – 50% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 1 (5%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 13 27%
Unsafe Speed 11 23%
Traffic Signals and Signs 6 13%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 16 33%
Rear End 15 31%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 6 13%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 4 8%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 16 33%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 18 38%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 10 21%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 2 4%
Dark – Streetlights 12 25%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 32 67%
Dusk/Dawn 1 2%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 4 8%
No 43 90%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
971
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Saviers Road 34 Automobile Right of Way (9)
Unsafe Speed (8)
Around half of the collisions
occurred during daylight time. The
study area recorded one fatal
collision and one severe injury
collision. The fatal collision occurred
on North Ventura Road, with the
cause remaining unknown. The
severe injury collision took place at
the intersection of North Ventura
Road and West 2nd Street, caused
by issues related to traffic signals
and signs.
2nd Street 24 Unsafe Speed (8)
Automobile Right of Way (7)
Around half of the collisions
occurred during daylight time. One
collision resulted in severe injury
and happened at the intersection of
North Ventura Road and West 2nd
Street.
972

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
973
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 9682%
Running Stop Sign 1311%
Running Red Light54%
Improper Turning3 3%
974

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Leticia Carabajal, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• There are concerns about parking occupancy between the school district offices and adult school students. The parking utilization in the lot should be checked. • The condition of the sidewalks and crosswalks near the school campus should be checked. These pedestrian accommodations impact students accessing the school on foot as well as students arriving from the Gold Coast Transit bus stops. 975

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Thursday, January 16, 2025
Start time: 3:00 PM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

2. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
976

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Solar Drive

2.3.1 Solar Dr and Wankel Way

2.3.1.1 A diagonal curb ramp is currently in place at this intersection but may be unnecessary. It is recommended to consider removing the ramp and adding slow curve markings.

2.3.1.2 There is a curb ramp with no crosswalk; it is recommended to stripe curve markings and include a crosswalk.

Graves Avenue

2.3.2 Graves Ave and Wankel Way

2.3.2.1 A posted speed limit sign indicating 40 mph is located at this intersection, which may be too high for the local context. It is recommended to reevaluate the posted limit and stripe a highvisibility crosswalk on the south leg, along with considering the addition of slow-curve markings to improve safety. (S/O Wankel)
East-West Streets
Gonzalez Road

2.3.3 Gonzalez Rd and Solar Dr

2.3.3.1 The posted speed limit is missing at this intersection; it is recommended to upgrade the crosswalk to high-visibility markings, improve the pedestrian push buttons, add a countdown signal across the West leg, and implement a bike facility upgrade to Class II.

2.3.4 Gonzalez Rd and Williams Dr

2.3.4.1 The ramps at this intersection are in good condition, but the eastbound bus stop lacks a shelter or bench, and there are no conflict markings between the bus stop and the bike lane. It is recommended to upgrade the crosswalk to a high-visibility and upgrade the push buttons. 977

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

East-West Streets
Gonzalez Road

2.4.1 Gonzalez Rd and Lombard St

2.4.1.1 This intersection features good ramps, but the existing crosswalk should be upgraded to standard high-visibility markings. The slip lane onto eastbound Gonzales may not be necessary and should be evaluated for potential removal. Additionally, the timing of the signal and yield markings in the slip lane should be evaluated, as there are no yield teeth.

Wankel Way

2.4.2 Wankel Way and Lombard St

2.4.2.1 There is a curb extension with trees on the North leg; it is recommended to upgrade the Northwest and Southwest ramps and refresh the markings, which have not yet been resurfaced.

2.4.2.2 Tactile warning pads are needed across the driveway on both the east and west sides of this intersection, as well as a crosswalk at the midblock trail crossing.

2.4.3 Wankel Way and Driveway Entrance (E/O Lombard St)

2.4.3.1 A curb ramp is needed at the driveway entrance, and a stop sign should be added at the driveway exit to ensure traffic control and pedestrian safety.

2.4.4 Wankel Way and Impatiens Dr

2.4.4.1 Tactile warning pads are needed across the driveway on both the east and west sides of this intersection. In addition, the Northbound and Southbound exits need a stop sign.

2.4.5 Wankel Way and Williams Dr

2.4.5.1 The southeast corner of this intersection requires a curb ramp upgrade to improve accessibility and comply with ADA standards.

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
No observations were made – there is no arrival or dismissal period for this school. 978
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Parkview Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
979

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
The school is located outside of the City of Oxnard; therefore, collision data and citation is very limited. Maps are shared here to show nearby patterns on South J Street and Bard Road. The “empty” maps within the ¼ mile radius of the school show in the following pages should be interpreted to be a lack of data included in the City of Oxnard analysis, not necessarily a lack of collisions or citations.
980
981
982

1.2 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.

Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign 119 100%
983
• Most students live in the surrounding neighborhood and are dropped off by parents. Some students arrive by bus, walk, and very limited number of students’ bike.
• Key locations include: City of Port Hueneme (school location), Bard Road & 6th Place crosswalk (crossing guard location), Helen Street between 6th Place/Parkview (gate entrance location), Bard Road between 6th Place/Parkview (gate entrance location)
• Key issues include: vehicle speeds, no dedicated drop-off/pick-up zone, and parking/blocking of staff spots

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Sarahi Gonzalez, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
984

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Monday, November 27, 2023
- Start time: 7:30 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Principal Sarahi Gonzalez – Parkview

2. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

3. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

4. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
985

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
6th Place

2.3.1 6th Place & Bard Drive

2.3.1.1 The crosswalks are located on the south and west bound legs, and they are standard. The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for accessibility.

2.3.1.2 The road is very wide with narrow sidewalks.

2.3.1.3 There are lots of vehicles that are making right turns onto 6th Street backing up vehicles on Bard Road as the crossing guard controls.

2.3.2 6th Place & 6th Street

2.3.2.1 There is no curb cut at the school cross walk, which should be added for accessibility.

2.3.2.2 There are no tactile pads perpendicular to crosswalk.

2.3.3 6th Place & Helen Street

2.3.3.1 There is an unmarked crosswalk on the near side of the south bound leg.

2.3.3.2 There is a standard crosswalk on the east bound leg. There is a continental crosswalk on the north bound leg.

2.3.3.3 There is no red curb by the hydrant.

2.3.3.4 The road is very wide with narrow sidewalks.
986
Park Avenue

2.3.4 Park Avenue & Helen Street

2.3.4.1 The stop signs are small.

2.3.4.2 There are no tactile pads on ramps.

2.3.4.3 There is a standard crosswalk on east bound leg.

2.3.4.4 There are no crosswalks across the north and south legs. 987
East-West Streets
Bard Road

2.3.5 Bard Road & Park Avenue

2.3.5.1 There are standard school crosswalks on all legs of the intersection.

2.3.5.2 There are no tactile pads on the crosswalks.

2.3.6 Bard Road between Ventura Road & J Street

2.3.6.1 On the east bound leg there is a flashing speed sign operating at 9 a.m.

2.3.6.2 There is no crosswalk across Bard except for the one on 6th Place.

2.3.6.3 6th Place has narrow sidewalks.

2.3.6.4 Road work signs are present.

2.3.6.5 No bike lane markings.
988
Helen Street

2.3.7 Helen Street & 7th Street

2.3.7.1 There is standard stripping of the crosswalk on the south bound leg. The recommendation is to upgrade to a high visibility crosswalk.

2.3.7.2 This is a school zone.

2.3.7.3 Upgrades are in the works.

2.3.8 Helen Street & 7th Place

2.3.8.1 There is a standard crosswalk on the south bound leg.

2.3.8.2 There is a continental crosswalk on the east bound leg. There is no ramp cut out on the southwest corner of the intersection.

2.3.8.3 The ramps have no tactile pads.
989

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
8th Street

2.4.1 8th Street & Park Avenue

2.4.1.1 No crosswalks are present at this intersection.

2.4.1.2 There is one stop control on the east bound leg of the intersection.

2.4.2 8th Street & Glacier Avenue

2.4.2.1 There are speed bumps on the south leg of the intersection.

2.1.1.1 No crosswalks are present at this intersection.

2.1.1.2 There is one stop control on the west bound leg of the intersection.

2.1.1.3 No curb ramp tactile pads.

2.1.1.4 The road curves, creating a blind spot for southbound traffic.

J Street

2.1.2 J Street & Glacier Avenue

2.1.2.1 No crosswalks are present at this intersection.

2.1.2.2 There is one stop control on the east bound leg of the intersection.

2.1.2.3 No curb ramp tactile pads.

2.1.2.4 The sidewalks are narrow and there is a hydrant in the sidewalk.

2.1.3 J Street & Bard Road

2.1.3.1 Hedges should be trimmed for visibility.

2.1.3.2 Would recommend to the fence back.
990

2.5 Arrival Observations
The team observed arrival at two locations since Parkview has several entrances but no dedicated drop-off/pick-up zone: Bard Road between 6th Place and Helen Street between 6th Place and Park Ave. Bard Road was selected because Principal Sarahi Gonzalez noted that parents drop off their children near the TK area there, while kindergarteners are dropped off at the gate on Helen Street. Helen Street was chosen as well due to concerns about speeding and the need for traffic calming measures.

General Observations:
- The elementary school has an enrollment of 576 students in grades TK-5. There are early arrivals at 7:15 AM and parents wait for the gate to open at 7:30 AM to drop off their children.

The crossing guard on Bard Road is not located directly in front of the school, and the bus drop-off area is in front of the kindergarten building. School starts at 8:00 AM, and the Oxnard Police Department (OPD) occasionally patrols the area. Breakfast is served from 7:30 to 8:00 AM, and street sweeping occurs on both sides of the street on Thursdays in the afternoon/evening (PM).

Bard Road between 6th Place and Park Ave:
- 6th Place and Bard Road is very busy.
- There are lots of vehicles trying to make a right turn from Bard Road onto 6th Place. This turn causes the queue to build up along Bard Road as the crossing guard controls. There were also drop offs in the turn lane .
- Parents wait on Bard Road for the door to open for TK. - Bussing from a few blocks away across J Street, about 50 kids. - Bus drops off in front of school causing a blind spot in front of school at the crosswalk.

Helen Street between 6th Place and Park Ave:
- There is a demand for a crossing guard on 6th Place by parents. - 8 cars queue on the south bound leg of 6th Place.
- 4 cars queue on the north bound leg of 6th Place.
- The speed bumps on Helen should be on 6th Place.
991
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio del Mar Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
992

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
993
994
995
Key Findings
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Rio del Mar Elementary (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 53
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 7 (13%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 23 (43%) (KSI: 4 – 57% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 5 (9%) (KSI: 2 – 29% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 3 (6%) (KSI: 0)
Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Traffic Signals and Signs 15 28%
Unsafe Speed 13 25%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 22 42%
Rear End 11 21%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 8 15%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 14 26%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 13 25%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 18 34%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 1 2%
Dark – Streetlights 17 32%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 33 62%
Dusk/Dawn 2 4%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 1 2%
No 52 98%
Times in bold are when school is in session.
996
Summary Notes
• There were 53 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Rio del Mar Elementary School.
• 7 resulted in a severe injury. 4 of these involved someone under 16 years of age. There were no fatal collisions.
• There were five collisions involving a pedestrian and three involving a bicyclist. One collision involving a pedestrian also involved someone under 16 years of age. This collision occurred at Forest Park Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue.
• Concentrations of collisions occurred at Vineyard Avenue & Simon Way as well as Vineyard Avenue & Forest Park Boulevard.

Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Vineyard Way (SR 232) 42 Traffic Signs & Signals (12)
Unsafe Speed (11)
Vineyard Way & Simon/Thame
s River 19 Automobile Right of Way (5)Unsafe Speed (5)
Vineyard Way & Forest Park 12 Traffic Signs & Signals (4) Vineyard Way & Walnut 9 Traffic Signs & Signals (4)
Forest Park Boulevard 5 Traffic Signs & Signals (3)
Forest Park &
Garonne/Riverpark 2 Traffic Signs & Signals (2)
Action During Collisions
• The leading violations were Traffic Signals & Signs (28%) and Unsafe Speed (25%). o Traffic Signals & Signs collisions occurred mostly along Vineyard Avenue at its intersections with Thames River Drive/Simon Way, Walnut Drive, and Forest Park Boulevard.
o Unsafe Speed collisions also almost exclusively occurred along Vineyard Avenue within the study area.

1.2 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
997
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard 241 88%
Running Red Light 20 7%
Speeding9 3%
Running Stop Sign2 1%
Improper Turning11%
998
• The majority of students attending the school come from the Riverpark neighborhood, but Rio del Mar will be taking over as neighborhood school for Rio Plaza so more students will be coming across Vineyard. • Very few numbers of bikes and walkers, no school buses. • Single arrival point at main gate with staggered arrival, dismissal occurs at front entrance and back gates off of Vineyard.
• Times are staggered with Rio Vista to avoid the worst of peak congestion.

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with Principal Leslie Hudson to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
999

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Monday, October 30, 2023
- Start time: 7:45 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and windy
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
1000

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Vineyard Avenue
Figure 2. Observed Corridor of Vineyard Avenue

2.3.1 Vineyard Avenue & Thames River Drive

2.3.1.1 Curb ramps lack truncated domes on the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection.

2.3.2 Vineyard Avenue between Thames River Drive & Forest Park Drive

2.3.2.1 There are no school speed limit signs, however there are school zone signs (Figure 3).
1001
Figure 3. School zone signs on Vineyard Avenue

2.3.2.2 The driveway from the park provides both a left and right out onto Vineyard, potentially increasing conflicts between turning vehicles and fast-moving traffic on Vineyard.

2.3.2.3 The driveway provides no lane marking or signage. It is unclear if it is intended for one way or two-way traffic.
1002

2.3.3 Vineyard Avenue & Walnut Drive

2.3.3.1 There are no sidewalks or ramps receiving the striped high-visibility school crosswalk on the east leg of the intersection (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Absence of sidewalk/ramp at Walnut & Vineyard

2.3.4 Vineyard Avenue & Forest Park Drive

2.3.4.1 There is no striped crosswalk across Vineyard Avenue and no sidewalk on the east side of Vineyard. A gap in the fence allows pedestrians to access the intersection from Orange Drive. This lack of pedestrian access may be more critical when Rio del Mar begins pulling more students from the El Rio neighborhood on the east side of Vineyard. This is a pedestrian collision hotspot.
1003
East-West Streets
Thames River Drive
Figure 5. Observed Corridor of Thames River Drive

2.3.5 Thames River Drive between Vineyard Avenue & Forest Park Boulevard

2.3.5.1 There are no speed limit or school zone signs along this portion, despite it’s proximity to the main school campus and roadway curvature.

2.3.6 Thames River Drive & Kiawah River Drive

2.3.6.1 No bike signage or markings are present in the roundabout. The bike lanes approaching the intersection drop off.

2.3.7 Thames River Drive & Indus Place

2.3.7.1 There are no truncated domes or tactile markings on the curb ramps.

2.3.7.2 There is no striped crosswalks at the intersection, despite being proximate to the entrance of Rio Vista Middle School (Figure 6).
1004
Figure 6. Lack of crosswalk at Thames River & Indus Drive in front of school campus

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

East-West Streets
Kiawah River Drive
Figure 7. Observed Corridor of Kiawah River Drive
1005

2.4.1 Kiawah River Drive & Roja Lane

2.4.1.1 This intersection is two-way stop controlled (side-street controlled stopping movements on Roja Lane). Parents and community members indicated that at this location it can be difficult to see other motorists around parked cars and drivers can appear to speed on Kiawah River. Visibility for pedestrians in crosswalk is also low due to parked vehicles.

Indus Place
Figure 8. Observed Corridor of Indus Place

2.4.2 Indus Place & Shenandoah Drive

2.4.2.1 There is no red curb at this location. Cars were observed parking into the intersection and on to/obstructing curb ramps.
1006
Forest Park Boulevard
Figure 9. Observed Corridor of Forest Park Boulevard

2.4.3 Forest Park Boulevard & Thames River Drive

2.4.3.1 Curb ramps lack truncated domes or tactile warning pads on all curb ramps.

2.4.3.2 The pedestrian signals lack countdown timers in the “flashing don’t walk” phase.

2.4.3.3 The intersection has older-style pedestrian push buttons. 1007

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
The team observed arrival at two primary locations: the staff parking lot entrance and exit and the main parking lot drop-off zone closer to the roundabout at Thames River and Kiawah River Drive. One team member also observed the conditions at Vineyard and Thames River for a portion of the arrival period, as there is usually a crossing guard stationed there and with attendance boundary changes will have more students crossing from El Rio in the future.

General Observations:
- All students arrive through the main entrance in the morning hours.

Staff Parking Lot/Thames River:
- Two drop-offs in the bike lane were observed.
- The left turn movement out of the parking lot onto Thames River seemed difficult due to visibility from the curvature and median.
- The staff lot was parked up pretty early, peak congestion between 8:10 and 8:20am. - Both lanes of the main lot were blocked by 8:10am. Parents were observed leaving their car and not pulling up all the way.

Main Lot/Roundabout:
- Cars start to line up in the main lot at 7:40am.
- The curb lane was parked up, the outer lane was mostly flowing with drop-offs. - Some drop-offs were observed in the parking lot stalls - Lots of left turns were observed outside of the main lot from the right lane. - A few dozen walkers were observed coming from the neighborhood. - Traffic accumulates northbound on Thames River and eastbound on Kiawah River at the roundabout
- The driver’s behavior was generally positive in terms of yielding to pedestrians at the crosswalks in the roundabout.
- The roundabout was almost completely clear by 8:25am. 1008
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio del Norte Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
1009

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Vineyard Avenue and Ventura Road within the study area.

Additionally, collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age were concentrated along these same roads. Within the study area, there were five severe injury collisions and none of the collisions resulted in a fatality. Notably, one of the severe injury collisions involved an individual under the age of 16 and occurred along Ventura Road.
1010
Within the study area, there was one bicycle collision, which occurred at the intersection of Kumquat Place and Kentia Street. Additionally, three collisions involved pedestrians, with two of them occurring at the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and Kentia Street. 1011
Collisions within the study area were primarily concentrated along Ventura Road and Vineyard Avenue. There were five severe injury collisions; two occurred along Stone Creek Drive and another two at the intersection of Ventura Road and Stone Creek Drive. There were no fatalities reported within the study area.
1012

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 41 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of Rio del Norte Elementary School. The study area recorded five severe injury collisions, and none of the collisions resulted in a fatality. The violation factors of these severe injury collisions included Unsafe Speed, Pedestrian Right of Way, Automobile Right of Way, and Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (41%) and Unsafe Speed (17%). • Automobile Right of Way collisions were concentrated along Vineyard Avenue, particularly at the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and Kentia Street. • Unsafe Speed collisions were concentrated along Ventura Road, particularly at the intersection of Ventura Road and Stone Creek Drive.
1013
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Rio del Norte Elementary School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 41
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 5 (12%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 10 (24%) (KSI: 1 – 20% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 3 (7%) (KSI: 1 – 20% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 1 (2%) (KSI: 1 – 20% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 16 39%
Unsafe Speed 8 20%
Improper Turning 4 10%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 17 41%
Hit Object 7 17%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 3 7%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 10 24%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 5 12%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 6 15%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 8 20%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 16 39%
Dusk/Dawn 0 0%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 4 10%
No 36 88%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
1014
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Ventura Road 12 Unsafe Speed (6)
Approximately half of the collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

There were two severe collisions
along Ventura Road, both at the
intersection of Ventura Road and
Stone Creek Drive. The contributing
factors for these severe collisions
were Improper Turning and Driving
Under the Influence of Alcohol.

Vineyard Avenue 22 Automobile Right of Way (16)
Approximately half of the collisions
occurred during daylight hours. One
collision along Vineyard Avenue,
which resulted in a severe injury,
took place at the intersection of
Vineyard and Kentia Street. The
violation factor for this collision was
Automobile Right of Way.
1015

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
1016
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 216 98%
Running Red Light52%
1017
• The school was originally designed as a neighborhood school but now also serves students from the Wagon Wheel and Vineyard Apartments. It appears that an increasing number of students are coming from these new areas. • Approximately 35% to 40% of students arrive by bus, while the rest are dropped off by vehicle. Bus services are provided for students commuting from farther neighborhoods.
• Key locations include: Lobelia Drive (bus drop-off), Kentia Street (dismissal gate), and Vineyard Avenue & H Street (crossing location). • Key issues include: double parking, congestion, crosswalk blockages, and students running across Vineyard Avenue.

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Hilda Garcia, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
1018

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Wednesday May 15, 2024
- Start time: 12:00 PM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: Minimum Day
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
1019

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Kentia Street

2.3.1 Kentia Street & Quail Run Way

2.3.1.1 There is a standard crosswalk on the northern leg of the intersection. It is recommended to upgrade it to a high-visibility and add a curb extension to the eastern landing.

2.3.1.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for accessibility.

2.3.2 Kentia Street & Timber Creek Trail

2.3.2.1 There are no crosswalks at the intersection. It is recommended to install stop controls and add new high-visibility crosswalks.

2.3.2.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added on the northern and eastern legs for improved accessibility.

2.3.2.3 A curb extension is recommended from the north leg to the west landing.

Lobelia Drive

2.3.3 Lobelia Drive & Stone Creek Drive

2.3.3.1 High-visibility crosswalks are needed across Stone Creek Drive and Lobelia Drive (at the park ramp).

2.3.3.2 Curb extensions or medians are recommended to reduce the crossing distance.

2.3.3.3 Right-turning vehicles traveling eastbound may not see pedestrians crossing.

2.3.4 Lobelia Drive & Redwing Lane

2.3.4.1 There is a standard crosswalk on the north leg of the intersection. It is recommended for it to be upgraded to a high visibility crosswalk.

2.3.4.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for accessibility.

2.3.4.3 An all-way stop control (AWSC), along with additional markings and a bus zone configuration is recommended.

2.3.5 Lobelia Drive between Redwing Lane & Stone Creek Drive

2.3.5.1 There is a yellow curb along the eastern portion of Lobelia Drive, but there is no signage indicating its intended use.
1020
East-West Streets
Quail Run Way

2.3.6 Quail Run Way & Lobelia Drive

2.3.6.1 There are standard crosswalks on the northern and eastern leg of the intersection. It is recommended for them to be upgraded to high visibility crosswalks.

2.3.6.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for accessibility.

2.3.6.3 The sidewalk is uplifted on the southeast corner and should be fixed to ensure accessibility.

2.3.7 Quail Run Way & Larkhaven Lane

2.3.7.1 There is a standard crosswalk on the eastern leg of the intersection. It is recommended for it to be upgraded to a high visibility crosswalk.

2.3.7.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for accessibility.

2.3.7.3 It is recommended to add a curb extension to the north landing. 1021

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Kentia Street

2.4.1 Kentia Street & Upper Bay Drive

2.4.1.1 No stop sign controls or crosswalks are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added and a marked high visibility crosswalk on the south and east leg.

2.4.1.2 The addition of curb extension on the western side of the intersection is recommended.

2.4.1.3 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for accessibility.

2.4.2 Kentia Street & Kentia Street

2.4.2.1 There are markings indicating slow down at the curve.

2.4.2.2 It is recommended to repair the uplifted sidewalk in this segment to improve accessibility.

2.4.3 Kentia Street & Nightingale Place

2.4.3.1 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for accessibility.

H Street

2.4.4 H Street & Rosebud Drive

2.4.4.1 There are stop controls in the east-west directions. It is recommended to install a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) and/or a stop-controlled crosswalk to better connect the neighborhood within the school’s attendance boundary, as it is quite distant from other marked or controlled crossings.

2.4.5 H Street & Partridge Drive

2.4.5.1 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for accessibility.

2.4.6 H Street & Vineyard Avenue

2.4.6.1 There are standard crosswalks at all legs of the intersection. It is recommended for them to be upgraded to high visibility crosswalks.

2.4.7 H Street between Vineyard Avenue and Rosebud Drive

2.4.7.1 The speed limit in this segment is posted at 40 mph. It is recommended to lower the speed limit for safety.
1022

2.4.7.2 There are Class II bike lanes in both directions on H Street. It may be beneficial to convert these to buffered bike lanes.

2.4.7.3 There are currently conflicts between the bike lane markings and the parking signs.

It is recommended to remove the parking signs.

Jacaranda Drive

2.4.8 Jacaranda Drive & Orion Way

2.4.8.1 There are no markings indicating to reduce speeds at the curve. It is recommended to install slow curve markings and street signs to alert drivers.

Lobelia Drive

2.4.9 Lobelia Drive & Twin Oaks Drive

2.4.9.1 There are no crosswalks at the intersection. It is recommended to install stop controls.

2.4.9.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

East-West Streets
Stone Creek Drive

2.4.10 Stone Creek Drive & Northbrook Drive

2.4.10.1 There is a stop control on Northbrook Drive with a small stop sign, which should be replaced with a larger one for better visibility.

2.4.10.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

2.4.11 Stone Creek Drive & Otter Creek Lane

2.4.11.1 There is a hydrant blocking the clear path of travel on the south side of the intersection.

2.4.11.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

2.4.11.3 It is recommended to extend the curb to reduce the curb radius.

2.4.12 Stone Creek Drive & Ventura Road

2.4.12.1 There are standard crosswalks on all legs of the intersection. It is recommended to upgrade them to high-visibility crosswalks.

2.4.12.2 The curb cuts/ramps on the eastern side of the intersection lack truncated domes and should be added to improve accessibility.
1023

2.4.13 Stone Creek Drive between Ventura Road and Lobelia Drive

2.4.13.1 Stone Creek is a narrow road in this segment. It is recommended to add buffered, protected bike lanes that connect to the lanes on Ventura Road.

Redwing Lane

2.4.14 Redwing Lane and Redwing Lane

2.4.14.1 There are no markings indicating to reduce speeds at the curve. It is recommended to install slow curve markings and street signs to alert drivers.

2.4.15 Pedestrian Path between Stone Creek Drive and Redwing Lane

2.4.15.1 It is recommended to repair the uplifted sidewalk in this segment to improve accessibility.

Rosebud Drive

2.4.16 Rosebud Drive & Jacaranda Drive

2.4.16.1 There are no markings indicating to reduce speeds at the curve. It is recommended to install slow curve markings and street signs to alert drivers.

2.4.16.2 It is recommended to repair the uplifted sidewalk in this segment to improve accessibility.

2.4.17 Rosebud Drive & Ironstone Street

2.4.17.1 There are no crosswalks at the intersection. It is recommended to install stop controls.

2.4.17.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

Vineyard Avenue

2.4.18 Vineyard between Kentia Street and H Street

2.4.18.1 It is recommended to repair the uplifted sidewalk on the north side of this segment to improve accessibility.

Woodside Place

2.4.19 Woodside Place & Kentia Street

2.4.19.1 There are no crosswalks at the intersection. It is recommended to install stop controls.

2.4.19.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.
1024

2.4.20 Woodside Place & Lake Drive

2.4.20.1 There are no crosswalks at the intersection. It is recommended to install stop controls.

2.4.20.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be for improved accessibility.

2.4.21 Woodside Place & Lobelia Drive

2.4.21.1 There are no crosswalks at the intersection. It is recommended to install stop controls.

2.4.21.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.
1025

2.5 Dismissal Observations
The team observed dismissal at two locations: Quail Run Way and Kentia Street and Lobelia Drive and Quail Run Way. The first location was identified by neighbors as an area where double parking frequently occurs. Lobelia Drive was selected because Principal Hilda Garcia stated that kindergarten students are dismissed from this street.

General Observations:
- The school has gates on Lobelia Drive near the Kindergarten area and the front of the school. Kentia Drive's backstop is also a common dismissal point for many students.

Quail Run Way/ Kentia Street:
- North of the Kentia Street backstop area, the park is well-utilized to accommodate overflow pedestrian traffic.
- At the intersection of Kentia Street and Timber Creek Trail, a curb extension and highvisibility crosswalk are needed to guide pedestrians, as there are numerous midblock crossings.
- South of the Kentia Street backstop area, the situation is more chaotic, with cars double parking and making U-turns.
- At Kentia Street and Quail Run Way, parking obstructs the crosswalk. It is recommended to extend the curb to improve visibility and safety.

Lobelia Drive/ Quail Run Way:
- Cars are parked from 12:35 to 12:40 p.m., and the area is cleared by 1:07 p.m. - More cars are parked further north on Lobelia Drive near the TK and Kindergarten exit. - Buses are observed between 12:40 and 1:03 p.m.
- Cars begin to stop along Lobelia Drive at 12:45 p.m.
- There is a midblock crossing near Redwing Lane and at the intersection of Quail Run Way and Lobelia.
- A brief backup occurs in the travel lane south of Lobelia Drive at 12:52 p.m. - Dismissal begins at 12:54 p.m., and the area starts to clear up around 12:57 p.m. - Illegal U-turns are observed during pickup at dismissal, both on Quail Run Way and Lobelia.
- Many parents cross midblock to reach cars across Lobelia Drive. - Some driveways on Redwing Lane are blocked.
1026
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio del Sol STEAM School (6-8)
Prepared By:
1027

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Ventura Road and Oxnard Boulevard within the study area.

Additionally, collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age were concentrated along these same roads. There was one severe injury collision, which occurred along Town Center Drive. None of the collisions within the study area resulted in a fatality. 1028
There were pedestrian collisions within the study area, which were spatially spread out. None of the collisions within the study area involved a bicyclist. 1029
Collisions within the study area were predominantly concentrated along Ventura Road and Oxnard Boulevard. There was one severe collision that occurred along Town Center Drive, but the contributing factor for this collision remains unknown. Additionally, one third of the collisions within the study area involved individuals under the age of 16. 1030

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 31 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of Rio del Sol STEAM Academy. The study area recorded three fatal collisions and 17 severe injury collisions. The majority of the Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI) collisions occurred along Pleasant Valley Road or Saviers Road, primarily due to Unsafe Speed. Approximately one third of the collisions took place during daylight hours.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug (29%), Automobile Right of Way (16%), and Improper Turning (16%). • Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug collisions were concentrated along Ocean Boulevard and Ventura Road.
• Automobile Right of Way collisions were prevalent along Oxnard Boulevard. • Improper Turning collisions were also prevalent along Forest Park Boulevard. 1031
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Rio del Sol STEAM Academy (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 31
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 1 (3%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 11 (35%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions)
Pedestrian-Involved 6 (19%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 0 (0%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
9 29%
Automobile Right of Way 5 16%
Improper Turning 5 16%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 7 23%
Rear End 7 23%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 5 16%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 1 3%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 6 19%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 9 29%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 15 48%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 1 3%
Dark – Streetlights 16 52%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 13 42%
Dusk/Dawn 1 3%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes Yes 9
No No 22
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
1032
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Oxnard Boulevard 15
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
(5)
Improper Turning (3)
Nearly one third of the collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

There was one severe injury
collision along Oxnard Boulevard,
which happened at night and was
caused by Driving Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drugs.

Ventura Road 9
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
(4)
Only one of the collisions occurred
during daylight hours. Additionally,
none of the collisions along Ventura
Road resulted in a severe injury or
fatality.
1033

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
1034
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding 403 98%
Running Stop Sign82%
1035
• The school serves a countywide attendance boundary, with the majority of students coming from the Riverpark neighborhood.
• Approximately 30% of students walk to school, 15% bike together, and the remaining students are dropped off by parents. Additionally, some students come from the Wagon Wheel area, with two families walking, while the rest are dropped off.
• The school does not have school buses, as it operates as a lottery magnet school, and there are no crossing guards due to liability concerns. • Key locations include: Ventura Road & Forest Park Boulevard (roundabout location) and Ventura Road (north and south parking lots driveway) • Key issues include: vehicle speeds, congestion, fender benders, and illegal U-turn maneuvers.

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Ryan Emery, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
1036

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Friday, May 17, 2024
- Start time: 7:45 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
1037

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

East-West Streets
Ventura Road

2.3.1 Ventura Road & Green River Street

2.3.1.1 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

2.3.1.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.3.2 Ventura Road & Flathead River Street

2.3.2.1 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

2.3.2.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.3.3 Ventura Road & Forest Park Boulevard

2.3.3.1 The roundabout needs better bike accommodation.

2.3.3.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

2.3.3.3 There is a double threat on all approaches.

2.3.4 Ventura Road & Garonne Street

2.3.4.1 Consider converting the intersection into a roundabout to reduce congestion at the school driveways, particularly at the south driveway, and to improve access to the north driveway.

2.3.4.2 Consider closing the south lot to drop-offs and converting it into a staff-only parking area.

2.3.4.3 In the short term, upgrade the existing standard crosswalks to high-visibility ones and improve the curb cuts/ramps by adding truncated domes for better accessibility. 1038

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

East-West Streets
Ventura Road

2.4.1 Ventura Road & Owens River Drive

2.4.1.1 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for improved accessibility.

2.4.1.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.2 Ventura Road & Clyde River Place

2.4.2.1 The curb cuts/ramp located in the northeastern corner lacks a truncated dome, which should be added for improved accessibility.

2.4.3 Ventura Road & Commercial Driveways

2.4.3.1 The sidewalk and curb cuts/ramps should be upgraded for improved accessibility on both sides of Ventura Road.

2.4.4 Ventura Road & Town Center Drive

2.4.4.1 The curb cuts/ramps on the western side of the intersection lack truncated domes, and they should be added for improved accessibility.

2.4.4.2 The sidewalk on the eastern side is uplifted and should be repaired.

2.4.5 Ventura Road between Wagon Wheel Road and Forest Park Boulevard

2.4.5.1 There are two-way Class II bike lanes connecting the US-101 pedestrian bridge to Wagon Wheel and River Park.

2.4.5.2 Bike lane markings are needed, and the bike lane is too narrow (only 4 feet wide). 1039

2.5 Dismissal Observations
The team observed the dismissal process along Ventura Road at the north and south parking lot driveways. These driveways were selected because, as Principal Emery noted, the north lot driveway is located near the gate for grades 1-5 and the gate for grades 6-8. The south lot driveway, on the other hand, is close to the main entrance for grades 1-5 and the gate for TK/Kinder.

General Observations:
- The school has entrances facing Ventura Road. The north lot driveway is used for car drop-off and pick-up for students in grades 1-8, while the south lot driveway is designated for drop-off and pick-up of TK/Kinder students. - Classes for students in grades TK-5 begin at 8:15 a.m., and classes for grades 6-8 start at 8:30 a.m.
- At the south loop/driveway, the campus supervisor is positioned at 1:55 p.m. and closes the lot at 2:00 p.m., keeping it closed for 10 minutes after dismissal to prevent cars from entering the loop while kindergarten students are being released. - At the north loop/driveway, CSAs are stationed to help manage traffic. The driveway is wide enough for parents to line up, with the curbside lane designated for grades K-5, and the middle lane used by parents picking up middle school students. - While there is not much backup onto Ventura Road, there are occasional instances where drivers stop in the bike lane (though this doesn’t happen when CSAs are present).

Ventura Road/North Driveway:
- By 8 a.m., the nearby gate is already busy with southbound traffic on Ventura Road, causing a queue to back up out of the driveway.
- There is a significant number of pedestrians walking from the north on Ventura and east of Forrest Park.
- Southbound traffic begins to back up into the roundabout. - Starting at 8:05 a.m., multiple drop-offs occur in the bike lane and roundabout. - Bicycles are observed on the sidewalks and in the streets. - By 8:07 a.m., Ventura Road is fully congested southbound. - Between 8:10 and 8:15 a.m., full gridlock occurs, but the traffic begins to clear at the roundabout.
- The roundabout prevents vehicles from exiting the north lot. - By 8:20 a.m., the area is clear, but there is a lack of traffic control officers, crossing guards to manage pedestrians, and educational or enforcement measures. Staggered arrivals could help reduce congestion.
1040
Ventura Road/South Driveway:
- By 7:55 a.m., the area is already busy.
- Traffic is backing up between the roundabout and the driveway entrance. - Pedestrian visibility is limited when crossing the driveway into the school. - Many people are parking in the lot south of the school and walking in, with some cutting through the lot to avoid conflicts at the driveway.
- Pedestrians walking through the roundabout seem to be following the rules, with good compliance.
- Unaccompanied children are walking from the south (possibly from drop-off areas). - There are definitely drop-offs occurring in the roundabout. - Some people are using scooters as a mode of transportation. - The driveway queue clears by 8:20 a.m.
- By 8:25 a.m., the area is clear and quiet.
- No drop-offs were observed from the inner lane of the roundabout. 1041
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio del Valle Junior High School (6-8)
Prepared By:
1042

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along North Rose Avenue and Auto Center Drive within a quarter-mile radius of Rio del Valle Middle School. Within the study area, there was one severe injury collision, which occurred along North Rose Avenue. This collision was caused by driving or bicycling under the influence of alcohol or drugs and it happened at night.

Note: Collision data was only analyzed within the City of Oxnard. Therefore, the maps in this section do not include any collision trends outside the City boundary north of Collins Street and west of Rose Avenue.
1043
There was one bicycle collision within the study area, which occurred along Auto Center Drive.

None of the collisions involved pedestrians.
1044
Collisions within the study area were predominantly concentrated along North Rose Avenue and Auto Center Drive. Of these, two collisions involved individuals under the age of 16; one occurred on North Rose Avenue and the other on Auto Center Drive. 1045

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
Between 2018 and 2022, there were 15 injury collisions within a quarter-mile radius of Rio del Valle Middle School. The study area recorded one severe injury collision. Collisions highly concentrated along North Rose Avenue and Auto Center Drive. The severe injury collision occurred on North Rose Avenue and was caused by driving or bicycling under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way 53%), Traffic Signals and Signs (13%), and Unsafe Speed (13%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions concentrated along Auto Center Drive. • Unsafe Speed collisions concentrated along Rose Avenue. • Traffic Signals and Signs collisions all occurred at the intersection of Rose Avenue and Collins Street.
1046
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Rio del Valle Middle School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 15
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 1 (7%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 2 (13%) (KSI: 0 –0% of all KSI collisions)
Pedestrian-Involved 0 (14%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 1 (5%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 8 53%
Traffic Signals and Signs 2 13%
Unsafe Speed 2 13%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 11 73%
Rear End 2 13%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 0 0%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 7 47%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 6 40%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 2 13%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 2 13%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 13 87%
Dusk/Dawn 0 0%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 1 7%
No 14 93%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
1047
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Auto Center Drive 8 Automobile Right of Way (5)
Five of the collisions occurred at
midday. One of these involved an
individual under the age of 16, and
another involved a bicyclist.

Rose Avenue 8 Automobile Right of Way (4)
Approximately half of the collisions
occurred at night. There was one
severe injury collision along Rose
Avenue, caused by driving or
bicycling under the influence of
alcohol or drugs, also occurring
during nighttime hours.
1048

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.

Note: Citation data was only analyzed within the City of Oxnard. Therefore, the maps in this section do not include any citation trends outside the City boundary north of Collins Street and west of Rose Avenue.
1049
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Speeding3 100%
1050

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Elizabeth Botello, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• Vehicles tend to spill out onto Rose Avenue, causing congestion in the parking lot between other vehicles and students crossing.
• The majority of students take the school bus to get to school. • There are major site improvements coming in the next few years. The school district acquired property just south of the school that is planned to become a new parking lot and pick-up/drop-off location for students.
1051

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
Start time: 3:15 PM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: Rio del Valle School was under construction at the time of the walk audit. We recommend re-auditing the dismissal period once construction is complete.

Attendees:

1. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

2. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
1052

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Rose Avenue

2.3.1 Rose Avenue and Walnut Drive

2.3.1.1 There was no sidewalk observed, and students were walking on the shoulder; it is recommended to install sidewalks along the roadway to provide a safer walking route.

2.3.1.2 The northeast ramps are lacking tactile warning surfaces; it is recommended to upgrade the ramps with truncated domes and ADA compliance.

2.3.1.3 The existing curb ramps on the East leg need upgrades to high-visibility standards; it is recommended to upgrade curb ramps to improve visibility and accessibility.

2.3.2 Rose Avenue, Walnut Drive, and School Driveway

2.3.2.1 There is no sidewalk along the East leg; it is recommended to add a new sidewalk and upgrade to high visibility.

2.3.3 Rose Avenue and Corsicana Drive

2.3.3.1 Tactical ramps were observed, along with wide curb radius on the west side.

2.3.3.2 Wide curb radius and ramp uplift were observed; it is recommended to tighten the curb radius.

2.3.4 Rose Avenue and Simon Way

2.3.4.1 The ramps observed were in good condition with a newer signal.

2.3.5 Way Rose Avenue and Orange Dr

2.3.5.1 Wide curb radius on the West side and ramp uplift were observed; it is recommended to upgrade the ramps.

East-West Streets
Simon Way

2.3.6 Simon Way and George St

2.3.6.1 Low visibility and no sidewalks were observed; it is recommended to upgrade curb ramps and add sidewalks for pedestrian access.

2.3.6.2 The new ramps need tactile pads; it is recommended to add new markings on the northbound side and refresh the markings on the southbound side.

Salem Avenue

2.3.7 Salem Ave and George St

2.3.7.1 There was no sidewalk observed on Salem and sidewalk uplift observed on George; it is recommended to add sidewalks for pedestrian access.

2.3.7.2 Vehicles were parked around the corners where no sidewalks exist; it is recommended to address corner visibility and add sidewalks.

2.3.7.3 The sidewalks on the East side need repair; it is recommended to prioritize sidewalk repairs 1053
along key student loading and unloading zones.

Helsam Avenue

2.3.8 Helsam Ave and George St

2.3.8.1 Sidewalk drop was observed; it is recommended to add “slow curve”.

2.4 Dismissal Observations
The team observed dismissal at two locations along Rose Avenue, Walnut Drive and the school driveway entrance.

General Observations:
- Vehicle queuing began around 2:40pm for staggered bells at 2:45pm, 2:48pm, and 2:55pm - Queuing cleared by 3:10pm
Rose Ave:
- Vehicles in queue backed up into outer lane on Rose Ave for about 10 minutes; some honking/frustration observed
Orange Drive:
- Circulation is one-way-in/one-way-out; outbound is signal controlled at Orange Drive - All pedestrians observed crossing at Orange Drive; mostly observed going directly into the neighborhood with some observed turning northbound and southbound on Rose Ave 1054
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio Lindo Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
1055

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Gonzales Road and the on and off ramps of US 101 and Rose Avenue within the study area. Collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age largely clustered along Gonzales Road as well. The only fatality collision within the study area occurred at the off-ramp of US 101 and Rose Avenue, resulting from a driver driving under the influence of alcohol or drug. The study area recorded no collisions that resulted in severe injuries. 1056
There were three pedestrian collisions and three bicycle collisions within the study area, occurring along Mono Street, Isabella Street, Vanderbilt Drive, and Gonzales Road. Notably, there was one collision that involved a pedestrian, a bicyclist, and someone under the age of 16 at the intersection of Snow Avenue and Gonzales Road. The cause of this particular collision was determined to be a violation of the pedestrian right of way. 1057
Putting all the information together, there was one fatality collision reported at the off-ramp of US 101 and Rose Avenue, which did not involve a pedestrian, bicyclist, or individual under the age of 16. This fatal collision was attributed to driving involving either alcohol or drugs.

Additionally, there were no collisions resulting in severe injuries within the study area. 1058

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 31 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Rio Vista Middle School. Among these, one collision resulted in a fatality and occurred at the off-ramp of US 101 and Rose Avenue, directly attributed to a driver under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

Notably, there were no collisions that resulted in severe injuries within this study area. The majority of these collisions were concentrated along Gonzales Road and the on and off ramps of US 101 and Rose Avenue.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Unsafe Speed (35%) and Traffic Signals and Signs (16%). • Collisions due to unsafe speeds were concentrated at the on and off ramps of US 101 and Rose Avenue.
• Traffic Signals and Signs collisions were prevalent along Gonzales Road. 1059
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Rio Lindo Elementary School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 31
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 1 (3%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 11 (35%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions)
Pedestrian-Involved 3 (10%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 3 (10%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Unsafe Speed 11 35%
Traffic Signals and Signs 5 16%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Rear End 11 35%
Broadside 8 26%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 9 14%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 6 19%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 6 19%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 8 26%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 11 35%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 4 13%
Dark – Streetlights 8 26%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 19 61%
Dusk/Dawn 0 0%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 2 6%
No 29 94%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
1060
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Gonzales Road and Snow
Avenue 6 Traffic Signals and Signs (2)
Unsafe Speed (2)
Three out of the six collisions
occurred during daylight hours. At
this intersection, there were three
collisions involving individuals
under the age of 16. One of these
collisions involved both a
pedestrian and a bicyclist.

On and off ramps of US 101 and
Rose Avenue 13 Unsafe Speed (10)
There was one collision that
resulted in a fatality, caused by a
driver under the influence of alcohol
or drugs. None of the 13 collisions
involved a pedestrian or bicyclist.

Two of the 13 collisions involved
someone under the age of 16, and
both were due to unsafe speed.
1061

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
1062
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign 41 79%
Speeding11 21%
1063
• Most students live in the local neighborhood, with some coming from Nyeland Acres. The school has an enrollment of 400 students. About half of the students walk to school, while bus services are available for students with special needs. There are two buses from Nyeland Acres that transport about 100 students. Only a small number of students regularly ride bikes. • Key locations include: Snow Avenue from Gonzales Road to Almendra Place (congestion area), Rio Lindo Street & Snow Avenue (parking lot and entrance), Rio Lindo Street & Lavanda Drive (dismissal gate), Snow Avenue & Emerald Street (dismissal gate).
• Key issues include: Congestion during dismissal, difficulty exiting the driveway due to car traffic, lack of designated/official drop-off lane

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Adaline Mendez, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity. The team learned:
1064

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2024
- Start time: 7:00 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
1065

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Snow Avenue

2.3.1 Snow Avenue & Emerald Street

2.3.1.1 There are standard crosswalks on the north and east legs of the intersection. They should be upgraded to high visibility crosswalks.

2.3.1.2 The curb cuts/ramps on the eastern corners of the intersection are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.3.1.3 The stop signs at the intersection are small.
1066
East-West Streets
Rio Lindo Street

2.3.2 Rio Lindo Street & Miramonte Drive

2.3.2.1 The intersection has a stop line on Miramonte Drive with a tiny stop sign.

2.3.2.2 There is a continental crosswalk on the eastern leg of the intersection.

2.3.2.3 The curb ramps on the north side of the intersection lack truncated domes and it is recommended for them to be upgraded.

2.3.3 Rio Lindo Street & Lavanda Drive

2.3.3.1 The intersection has a stop line on Lavanda Drive with a tiny stop sign.

2.3.3.2 There is a continental crosswalk on the eastern leg of the intersection.

2.3.3.3 The curb ramps on the north side of the intersection lack truncated domes and it is recommended for them to be upgraded.

2.3.4 Rio Lindo Street & Jardin Drive

2.3.4.1 The intersection has a stop line on Jardin Drive with a tiny stop sign.

2.3.4.2 The curb ramps on the north side of the intersection lack truncated domes and it is recommended for them to be upgraded.
1067

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Almanor Street

2.4.1 Almanor Street & Gonzales Road

2.4.1.1 Unprotected left turns are allowed from Almanor Street onto Gonzales Road.

2.4.1.2 It is recommended to tighten the turn radius into the neighborhood.

2.4.1.3 There are hydrants on the east side of the intersection.

2.4.1.4 The intersection does not have clear paths of travel for the minor street.

2.4.1.5 There are no street trees at the intersection.

2.4.2 Almanor Street & Emerald Street

2.4.2.1 The intersection has a stop line on Emerald Street with a tiny stop sign.

2.4.2.2 The curb ramps at the intersection lack truncated domes. It is recommended to upgrade these ramps and extend the curb to minimize the turn radius.

Snow Avenue

2.4.3 Snow Avenue & Almendra Place

2.4.3.1 The intersection has a stop line at Almendra Place, accompanied by a small stop sign. It is recommended to repaint the stop line for better visibility.

2.4.3.2 The curb ramps at the intersection do not have truncated domes. It is recommended to upgrade these ramps.

2.4.4 Snow Avenue & Caliente Way

2.4.4.1 The intersection has a stop line at Almendra Place, accompanied by a small stop sign.

2.4.4.2 The curb ramps at the intersection do not have truncated domes. It is recommended to upgrade these ramps.

2.4.5 Snow Avenue & Sabrina Street

2.4.5.1 The curb ramps at the intersection do not have truncated domes. It is recommended to upgrade these ramps.

2.4.5.2 There is no stop sign at the intersection. It is recommended to add crosswalk or stop line markings, as well as a stop sign, to regulate traffic on the side street. 1068

2.4.6 Snow Avenue & Gonzales Road

2.4.6.1 There are standard crosswalks on all legs of the intersection. They should be upgraded to high visibility yellow (Pacifica).

2.4.6.2 There are lots of U-turns (related to the Pacifica drop off).

2.4.6.3 The leading pedestrian interval has good signal timing for pedestrians across Gonzales.

2.4.6.4 The prevailing speed is signed is from 30 – 45 mph and the intersection are signed to be 45 mph. It is recommended for the speed limit be dropped.

East-West Streets
Emerald Street

2.4.7 Emerald Street & Isabella Street

2.4.7.1 The intersection has a stop line on Emerald Street with a tiny stop sign.

2.4.7.2 The curb ramps at the intersection lack truncated domes. It is recommended to upgrade these ramps and extend the curb to minimize the turn radius.

2.4.8 Emerald Street & Mono Street

2.4.8.1 The intersection has a stop line on Emerald Street with a tiny stop sign.

2.4.8.2 The curb ramps at the intersection lack truncated domes. It is recommended to upgrade these ramps and extend the curb to minimize the turn radius.

Echo Street

2.4.9 Echo Street & Mono Street

2.4.9.1 The curb ramps do not have truncated domes. It is recommended to upgrade these ramps and to tighten the curb radius.

2.4.9.2 There is no stop sign at the intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control, to regulate traffic on the side street.

2.4.10 Echo Street & Isabella Street

2.4.10.1 The curb ramps on the do not have truncated domes. It is recommended to upgrade these ramps and to tighten the curb radius.

2.4.10.2 There is no stop sign at the intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control, to regulate traffic on the side street.

2.4.11 Echo Street & Almanor Street/Echo Street

2.4.11.1 There is a 90-degree curve at this approach, and it is recommended for the addition of “slow” markings.

2.4.12 Echo Street & Snow Street
1069

2.4.12.1 The curb cuts/ramps on the eastern corners of the intersection are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

Sabrina Street

2.4.13 Sabrina Street & Mono Street

2.4.13.1 There are no side street stops, no markings, and no visible street signs at the intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control, to regulate traffic on the side street.

2.4.13.2 The curb cuts/ramps on the intersection are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.4.14 Sabrina Street & Isabella Street

2.4.14.1 There are no side street stops, no markings, and no visible street signs at the intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control, to regulate traffic on the side street.

2.4.14.2 The curb cuts/ramps on the intersection are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.4.15 Sabrina Street & Almanor Street

2.4.15.1 There are no side street stops, no markings, and no visible street signs at the intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control, to regulate traffic on the side street.

2.4.15.2 The curb cuts/ramps on the intersection are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.
1070

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observation
The team observed arrival at several locations since Rio Lindo has several entrances: Snow Avenue and the South Parking Lot driveway, Rio Lindo Street and the North Parking Lot driveway. These locations are where Principal Adeline Mendez noted that parents are using the parking lot instead of the designated drop-off lane, and where students are cutting through the open gate and the parking lot between the front gate, Rio Lindo Street, and Snow Avenue. It was also noted that only the front gate is open due to staffing constraints.

General Observations:
- The school has entrances facing Snow Avenue (where younger students are dismissed from the side gate) and Rio Lindo Street at Lavanda Drive (where older students are dismissed).

Snow Avenue/ Emerald Street/ South Parking Lot:
- At 7:40 a.m., upon arrival at the elementary school, there was light traffic in the drop-off area.
- Numerous pedestrians were using the crosswalk on Snow Avenue at Emerald Street. - While there was some crosswalk intrusion, overall compliance with the crosswalk and stop signs at Snow Avenue and Emerald Street was good.
- There was a backup in the southbound direction on Snow Avenue, which appears to be more related to drop-off traffic than the pedestrian crossing at Emerald Street. - A few left-turning vehicles were observed, and the visibility of these vehicles could be an issue.
- The main pedestrian gate is closer to Emerald Street and requires a high-visibility crosswalk and curb ramps.
- Some parking was observed on Snow Avenue related to drop-offs. - Through traffic was observed until 8:05 a.m.

Rio Lindo Street/ Snow Avenue/ North Parking Lot:
- There is a fast approach to the stop sign for northbound traffic on Snow Avenue. - Near Lafayette Drive and Princeton Avenue, there were routing issues and there were no sidewalks or stop signs.
- Campus monitors were present to help keep traffic moving. - Rio Lindo Street was not congested with parking on either side. - Many students were crossing Lavanda Drive, Miramonte Drive, and midblock but there was no crossing guard present.
- Families were walking down from the Rio Lindo Park.
1071
- The left turn lane began to back up from 7:50 to 7:55 a.m., with a few vehicles using the left drop-off lane until 7:52 a.m.
- The peak hour of traffic was from 7:55 to 7:58 a.m., with the area starting to clear up by 8:05 a.m.
- During the peak hour, some parents used the staff parking lot for drop-offs, and a few pedestrians were crossing the driveway.
1072
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio Mesa High School (9-12)
Prepared By:
1073

1. Collision and Citation Trends
The school is located fully outside the City of Oxnard; therefore, no data was available to conduct a collision or citation analysis.
1074

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team looked ahead to find key elements of the school and its surrounding area to focus on. There was no pre-audit call between the team and the school.

The team noted:
• Look for the mode split of how students are arriving to school, including school buses, as well as any traffic congestion that could be improved operationally. • The land surrounding the school is unincorporated.
1075

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Start time: 3:50 PM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

3. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
1076

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Burson Way

2.3.1 Burson Way and Perry Way

2.3.1.1 There are no sidewalks at this intersection and no stop sign; it is recommended to construct a sidewalk on all sides and place a stop sign.

Rose Avenue

2.3.2 Rose Ave and Central Ave

2.3.2.1 High-visibility school crosswalks are present on all sides of the intersection, and the curb ramps appear to be in good condition. No improvements are currently recommended.

East-West Streets
Central Avenue

2.3.3 Central Ave and Rose Ave

2.3.3.1 There are high visibility crosswalk markings at this intersection that need to be refreshed; no other changes were observed.

2.3.3.2 A westbound 40 mph speed limit sign is posted just before the school zone, which may cause confusion. It is recommended that this sign be removed for consistency with the school zone's reduced speed limit. (W/O Rose)

2.3.4 Central Ave and Strickland Dr

2.3.4.1 This intersection has good curb ramps, however, the sidewalk on Strickland ends before reaching Central, resulting in a pedestrian access gap.

2.3.5 Central Ave and Burson Way

2.3.5.1 Like Strickland, the sidewalk ends before reaching Central, creating a pedestrian gap. The intersection is otherwise equipped with good curb ramps and high-visibility crosswalks.

2.3.6 Central Ave and Joan Way

2.3.6.1 As with Strickland and Buxton, the sidewalk ends before connecting to Central, resulting in a pedestrian access gap. However, the intersection features good ramps and high-visibility crosswalks.

2.3.7 Central Ave, Rose Ave, and Vineyard Ave

2.3.7.1 There were no trucks observed during school hours, and there is a 40mph sign; it is recommended to change the sign to 25 mph with speed feedback. 1077
Sue Way

2.3.8 Sue Way and Joan Way

2.3.8.1 There are no stop signs at this intersection; it is recommended to include stop signs for pedestrian safety.

2.4 Dismissal Observations
The team observed dismissal at the front entrance of the school and the northwest parking lot entrance.

General Observations:
- Heavy school bus activity departing from dismissal at 3:40pm to approximately 3:50pm - Vehicle traffic backed up in both directions; little frustration was observed and drivers were courteous in letting others into or across the queue
- Dismissal traffic cleared by 4:00pm
Central Avenue:
- Many students observed walking to the Gold Coast Transit District bus that was waiting at the bus stop on Central Ave; GCTD bus departed at 3:45pm
- Bollards along centerline of Central Ave did not effectively prevent turning movements but may offer traffic calming benefits
- Students observed crossing Central to get into parked vehicles Rose Avenue:
- Students observed crossing Rose to get into parked vehicles 1078
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio Plaza Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
1079

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Summary
The school is located outside of the City of Oxnard; therefore, collision data and citation is very limited. Maps are shared here to show nearby patterns on North Ventura Avenue & Simon Way. The “empty” maps within the ¼ mile radius of the school show in the following pages should be interpreted to be a lack of data included in the City of Oxnard analysis, not necessarily a lack of collisions or citations.
1080
1081
1082

1.2 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary. No citations were recorded with the study area.
1083

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Lisette Garcia, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
• The immediate school campus and surrounding area is unincorporated in Ventura County.
• Some attending Oxnard students are from the far-south end of the attendance boundary.
• Ventura County is engaging in active transportation work throughout El Rio, including in Alvarado.
1084

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:

Walk Audit Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Start time: 8:15 AM
Weather Conditions: Clear
Events/Unique Conditions: None
Attendees:

1. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers

2. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers
1085

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Balboa Street

2.3.1 Balboa St and Salem Ave

2.3.1.1 The RRFB is permanently beeping, the device may need to be replaced and may need to add different voice languages other than English. In addition, it is recommended to upgrade all curb ramps.

2.3.2 Balboa St and Helsam Ave

2.3.2.1 All curb ramps need upgrading; it is recommended to install ADA-compliant ramps.

2.3.2.2 The sidewalks end after the school boundary on both sides; it is recommended to extend sidewalks beyond school grounds. (S/O Helsam)

2.3.3 Balboa St and Corsicana Dr

2.3.3.1 There are no sidewalks or curb ramps at the intersection; installation is recommended.

2.3.4 Balboa Street and Walnut Dr

2.3.4.1 There are no sidewalks or curb ramps at the intersection; installation is recommended.

2.3.4.2 Construction was observed on the south side of the street, but it was unclear whether this included sidewalk or storm drain upgrades.

Cortez Street

2.3.5 Cortez St and Walnut

2.3.5.1 The intersection has new curb ramps and sidewalk stubs; it is recommended to restripe the crosswalks for better visibility.

2.3.6 Cortez St, Walnut Dr, and Simon Way

2.3.6.1 There are new sidewalks up to the school property line; it is recommended to repair the old sidewalk North of the school property line on Cortez.

2.3.7 Cortez St and Corsicana Dr

2.3.7.1 The intersection has new curb ramps and sidewalk stubs; it is recommended to restripe the crosswalks for better visibility.

2.3.8 Cortez St General Corridor Notes

2.3.8.1 The final striping for crosswalk and pedestrian access still needs to be installed across multiple intersections.
1086
East-West Streets
Simon Way

2.3.9 Simon Way and Cortez St

2.3.9.1 The intersection has good crosswalk markings that may need refreshing; it is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps.

2.3.10 Simon Way and Rene St

2.3.10.1 The intersection has good crosswalk markings that may need refreshing; it is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps.

2.3.11 Simon Way and Elaine St

2.3.11.1 The intersection has good crosswalk markings that may need refreshing; it is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps.

2.3.12 Simon Way and Citrus St

2.3.12.1 The ramps at the intersection need upgrading; it is recommended to replace the existing ramps.

2.3.12.2 Some sidewalk uplift was observed on the south side of the intersection; it is recommended to repair the sidewalk.

2.3.12.3 Sidewalks exist on both sides, but visibility is limited due to obstructions; it is recommended to upgrade ramps and enhance visibility.

2.3.13 Simon Way and Minna St

2.3.13.1 There is a sidewalk on the west leg of Simon; it is recommended to add a sidewalk on all sides and upgrade the curb ramps.

2.3.14 Simon Way, Balboa St, Citrus St, and Cortez St

2.3.14.1 A school zone sign is missing or poorly placed; it is recommended to install a school zone sign with better visibility.

Helsam Ave

2.3.15 Helsam Ave and Citrus St

2.3.15.1 The sidewalk on the west side is uplifted at the corners; curb ramp upgrades are needed, and a stop sign is needed on the north leg of the intersection.

2.3.16 Helsam Ave, Cortez St, and Minna St

2.3.16.1 There are no sidewalks on either side of the intersection; sidewalk construction is recommended.

2.3.16.2 2.3.17 Helsam Ave and Cortez St

2.3.17.1 Sidewalk uplift was observed on the east leg of the intersection; it is recommended to upgrade ramps and add a red curb on the west approach.

2.3.17.2 The sidewalk on the west leg of Cortez ends abruptly with no continuation; it is recommended to add a stop sign on Cortez.

2.3.17.3 To the west of Cortez, there are no sidewalks present on either side; it is recommended to construct a sidewalk on both sides of the street.
1087

2.4 Arrival Observations
The team observed arrival at a few locations near Simon Way, Elaine Street and Rene/Balboa Streets.

General Observations:
- Pedestrian arrivals began around 7:30am
- Multiple staff observed managing inbound/outbound traffic; managing conflicts effectively - Heavy pedestrian traffic from all directions
- Arrival activity lasted through about 8:15am
- Vehicle traffic backed up in both directions by around 7:50am; cleared up intermittently until bell at 8:10am
Simon Way:
- Parents/guardians observed parking westbound on Simon and crossing their students over into the entrance
- Good driver compliance at red curb along eastbound Simon 1088
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio Real Elementary School (K-8)
Prepared By:
1089

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Rose Avenue within the area and notably clustered at the on and off ramps of Rose Avenue and US-101. Collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age largely clustered along Rose Avenue as well. There was one severe injury collision occurred along Rose Avenue and one fatality collision present at the off ramp of US-101 and Rice Avenue. 1090
There was one pedestrian collision that occurred along Alvarado Street and two bicycle collisions present at the east of the school along Ventura Boulevard. 1091
Putting all the information together, severe injury or fatality collisions within the study area did not involve a pedestrian, bicyclist, or someone under the age of 16. One pedestrian collision that also involved someone under the age of 16 occurred along Alvarado Street. 1092

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 50 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Rio Real School. One resulted in a severe injury, and one resulted in a fatality. None of these involved individuals under 16 years of age. There was one collision involving a pedestrian and two involving a bicyclist. One collision involving a pedestrian also involved someone under 16 years of age. Concentrations of collisions occurred along Rose Avenue, and at the on and off ramps of Rose Avenue and US-101.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Unsafe Speed (18%), Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug (14%), and Automobile Right of Way (14%). • Unsafe Speed collisions occurred primarily along Rose avenue, with clusters at the on and off ramps of Rose Avenue and US-101.
• Improper Turning collisions almost exclusively occurred along Rose Avenue as well.
• Automobile Right of Way collisions were fairly spread out of the study area. 1093
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Rio Real School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 50
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 2 (4%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 10 (20%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions)
Pedestrian-Involved 1 (2%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 2 (4%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Unsafe Speed 18 36%
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
8 16%
Automobile Right of Way 6 12%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Rear End 21 42%
Broadside 15 30%
Head-On 6 12%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 4 8%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 13 26%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 15 30%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 18 36%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 3 6%
Dark – Streetlights 16 32%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 29 58%
Dusk/Dawn 2 4%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 8 16%
No 42 84%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
1094
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Rose Avenue 40
Unsafe Speed (18)
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
(6)
27 of these collisions occurred
during daylight hours. There was
one severe injury collision occurred
in the middle of the street. Eight of
the ten collisions that involved
someone under 16 years old
occurred along Rose Avenue.

On and off ramps of Rose
Avenue and US-101 20
Unsafe Speed (12)
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug (4)
The on and off ramps of Rose
Avenue and US-101 are located
southeast of the School. 15 of these
collisions occurred during daylight
hours. None of these collisions
involved a pedestrian or a bicyclist.

Notably, there was one fatality
collision occurred at US-101 and
Rice Avenue at night due to the
influence of alcohol or drug.
1095

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
1096
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Red Light4 100%
1097
• About 60% of students live in the surrounding neighborhood. This is a choice school, and some students come from various locations within the El Rio area, with parents responsible for transportation.
• At least one student crosses the 101 freeway to attend. This represents about 10% to 15% of the student population.
• Approximately 30% of students arrive at school by bus, primarily from Nyeland Acres and the mobile home park near Costco. About 20-25% are driven to school, while 40-45% walk from nearby neighborhoods. • Key locations include: Kenny Street (school gate location), Royal Duke Mobile Estates (gate location connecting mobile park and school), Bethany Chapel – Assembly of God/ Oxnard Korean Church (planned drop-off area), Rose Avenue, Wright Road (high traffic area)
• Key issues include: lack of sidewalks and crosswalks, double parking, insufficient drop-off areas and congestion.

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Maria Hernandez and Assistant Principal Nidia Mejia to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
1098

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Thursday, January 25, 2024
- Start time: 1:45 PM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Tom Reilly – LSY Enterprise

2. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

3. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
1099

2.3 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Rose Avenue

2.3.1 Rose Avenue between Collins Street & Stroube Street

2.3.1.1 There are no sidewalks on the western side of Rose Avenue. It is recommended to add sidewalks and curb ramps.

2.3.1.2 The signal on Rose Avenue & Collins Street has a split phase.

2.3.2 Rose Avenue & Stroube Street

2.3.2.1 This is an unsignalized intersection with a stop sign and an unmarked crosswalk on the western side of the intersection.

2.3.3 Rose Avenue & Auto Center Drive

2.3.3.1 The signal timing is insufficient for pedestrians to safely cross the intersection, considering the distance. It is recommended to extend the pedestrian phase timing in the signal.

2.3.4 Rose Avenue between Collins Street & Auto Center Drive

2.3.4.1 The signal on Rose Avenue & Collins Street has a split phase.

2.3.4.2 The signal countdown is less than 20 seconds.

2.3.4.3 There are no sidewalks on the western side of Rose Avenue. It is recommended to add sidewalks and curb ramps.

Alvarado Street

2.3.5 Alvarado Street & Kenney Street

2.3.5.1 There are ladder crosswalks on the south and east leg of the intersection.

2.3.5.2 There is a lack of a sidewalk on the west side and there is a lack of curb ramps. It is recommended to install curb ramps at the intersection and a sidewalk on the western leg.

2.3.5.3 There are empty tree wells near the intersection.

2.3.5.4 Both approaches to Alvarado Street are unsignalized and there are no stop signs.

2.3.6 Alvarado Street & Collins Street

2.3.6.1 There is a ladder crosswalk and tactile pads on the eastern side of the intersection.

2.3.6.2 There is an unmarked crosswalk on the west side of the intersection.

2.3.6.3 There are no sidewalks on the north and west side of the intersection.

2.3.6.4 Both approaches to the intersection from Alvarado Street are unsignalized and there are no stop signs.
1100
East-West Streets
Stroube Street

2.3.7 Stroube Street & Kenney Street

2.3.7.1 There are ladder crosswalks on the south and east side of the intersection and there is a poor vision on the crosswalks

2.3.7.2 Both approaches to the intersection from Stroube Street are unsignalized and there are no stop signs.

2.3.8 Stroube Street between Balboa Street & Rose Avenue

2.3.8.1 There are no crosswalks on either side of Stroube Street.

2.3.8.2 The speed bumps along the segment are helping to reduce speeds.

2.3.9 Stroube Street & Balboa Street

2.3.9.1 There are ladder crosswalks on the north and south side of the intersection.

2.3.9.2 There are no sidewalks on any of the approaches.

2.3.9.3 There are flooding issues at and near the intersection. There are no curbs or gutters.

2.3.9.4 There is one storm drain on the northwestern side of the intersection.

2.3.9.5 Both approaches to the intersection from Stroube Street are unsignalized and there are no stop signs.

2.3.9.6 There are speed humps on the west side of Stroube Street.

2.3.10 Stroube Street & Alvarado Street

2.3.10.1 There are ladder crosswalks on the north, side and east side of the intersection.

2.3.10.2 There are no sidewalks on the western side of the intersection. There are sidewalks on the east side of the intersection.

2.3.10.3 Both approaches to the intersection from Stroube Street are unsignalized and there are no stop signs.

2.3.10.4 There is a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB), partial curb, and permeable parking on the east side of the intersection.

Collins Street

2.3.11 Collins Street & Rose Avenue

2.3.11.1 There are ladder crosswalks on the north, east, and west side of the intersection.

2.3.11.2 There is no crosswalk on the south leg of the intersection.

2.3.11.3 There are tactile pads on the northwest and the north and southeast of the intersection.

2.3.11.4 There are no sidewalks on the southwest side of the intersection.

2.3.12 Collins Street between Alvarado Street & Rose Avenue

2.3.12.1 There is a sidewalk on the northern side of Collins Street. 1101

2.4 Dismissal Observations
The team observed student dismissal at the following locations: Kenney Street at the curve and Kenney Street and Stroube Street. Kenney Street was highlighted because Principal Hernandez and Assistant Principal Mejia noted that there is no crosswalk leading to a narrow sidewalk that connects to the school gate. Furthermore, Stroube Street lacks a sidewalk, forcing students to walk along Rose Avenue to access Stroube Street.

General Observations:
- The school has entrances and exits facing Kenney Street (where all students are dismissed), a church parking lot (designated for parent pick-up), and gates near the mobile park and on the western side of the school.
- The school has staggered dismissal times: Grade K at 2:05 PM, Grades 1-3 at 2:10 PM, Grades 4-5 at 2:11 PM, and Grades 6-8 at 2:41 PM.

Kenney Street at curve:
- There are many people crossing at this location during earlier dismissals. - Five buses exit the school and merge with the cars.
- Congestion occurs briefly from 2:10 PM to 2:15 PM.
- Some pedestrians are using the gate that leads to the mobile park. - Dismissal at 2:40 PM starts slowly, and the area at the curve is quiet. - Most people seem to walk northwest on Kenney from the release gate. - There is one child on a bike, one bus loading, and several walkers.

Kenney Street & Stroube Street:
- Parents are using the church parking lot to access the elementary school.

Most people using the crosswalk are doing so to reach parked cars or nearby homes. - Kenney Street experiences backups at 2:15 PM.
- A queue forms on eastbound Stroube Street at 2:15 PM and clears by 2:30 PM. - Illegal U-turns are being made on Stroube Street.
- There is no crosswalk, forcing pedestrians to navigate between cars to reach the parking lot.
- There are no crossing guards at the intersection.
- Visibility for the crosswalk at the intersection is poor. - The first middle school bus arrives at 2:40 PM and leaves at 2:41 PM; the second bus arrives shortly after and departs at 2:48 PM.
- Pedestrians are utilizing the rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB). - Children are running across the church entrance.
1102
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio Rosales Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
1103

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
This Collision Trends analysis includes injury collisions from 2018 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary. The analysis focuses on the quarter-mile radius around the school, as pedestrian and bicyclist activities are concentrated when students are approaching or departing campus. Collisions were concentrated on Kohola Street, particularly at the intersection with Paseo Ortega. Within the study area, there were no collisions that resulted in severe injuries or fatalities.
1104
There were two pedestrian collisions and one bike collision within the study area. 1105
1106
Key Findings
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Rio Rosales Elementary (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 15
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 0
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 8 (53%)
Pedestrian-Involved 2 (13%)
Bicycle-Involved 1 (7%)
Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 3 20%
Improper Turning 3 20%
Top Crash Type Count Percent of Total
Broadside 7 47%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 2 13%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 3 20%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 5 33%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 5 33%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 5 33%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 10 67%
Dusk/Dawn 0 0%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 1 7%
No 14 93%
Times in bold are when school is in session.
1107
Summary Notes
• There were 15 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Rio Rosales Elementary School. Zero collisions resulted in a death or serious injury within this area.
• There were two collisions involving a pedestrian and one involving a bicyclist. Both the collision involving a bicyclist and one of the two involving a pedestrian involved someone under 16 years of age.
• A concentration of vehicular collisions occurred in the southeast area of the neighborhood surrounding Rio Rosales, around the intersection of Paseo Ortega and Paseo Isla.

Time of Day and Location
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Kohala Street 6 N/A
Kohala Street & Camino del Sol 5 N/A
Kohala Street & Paseo Elegante 1 Pedestrian Right of Way (1) Paseo Ortega 4 Improper turning (3)
Paseo Ortega & Paseo Isla 4 Improper turning (3)
Milagro Place 1 Automobile Right of Way (1)
Milagro & Gibraltar 1 Automobile Right of Way (1)
Action During Collisions
• The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (20%) and Improper Turning (20%). o Automobile right of way collisions occurred across the quarter-mile area with no discernable pattern, while improper turning collisions occurred mainly in the area of Paseo Ortega and Paseo Isla.

1.2 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
1108
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign 45 92%
Improper Turning24%
Speeding24%
1109
• The majority of students attending the school come from the Riverpark neighborhood, but Rio del Mar will be taking over as neighborhood school for Rio Plaza so more students will be coming across Vineyard. • Very few numbers of bikes and walkers, no school buses. • Single arrival point at main gate with staggered arrival, dismissal occurs at front entrance and back gates off of Vineyard.
• Times are staggered with Rio Vista to avoid the worst of peak congestion.

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with Principal Leslie Hudson to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
1110

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Monday, October 30, 2023
- Start time: 7:45 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and windy
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
1111

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Vineyard Avenue

2.3.1 Vineyard Avenue & Thames River Drive

2.3.1.1 Curb ramps lack truncated domes on the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection.

2.3.2 Vineyard Avenue between Thames River Drive & Forest Park Drive

2.3.2.1 There are no school speed limit signs, however there are school zone signs.

2.3.2.2 The driveway from the park provides both a left and right out onto Vineyard, potentially increasing conflicts between turning vehicles and fast-moving traffic on Vineyard.

2.3.2.3 The driveway provides no lane marking or signage. It is unclear if it is intended for one way or two-way traffic.

2.3.3 Vineyard Avenue & Walnut Drive

2.3.3.1 There are no sidewalks or ramps receiving the striped high-visibility school crosswalk on the east leg of the intersection.

2.3.4 Vineyard Avenue & Forest Park Drive

2.3.4.1 There is no striped crosswalk across Vineyard Avenue and no sidewalk on the east side of Vineyard. A gap in the fence allows pedestrians to access the intersection from Orange Drive. This lack of pedestrian access may be more critical when Rio del Mar begins pulling more students from the El Rio neighborhood on the east side of Vineyard. This is a pedestrian collision hotspot.
1112
East-West Streets
Thames River Drive

2.3.5 Thames River Drive between Vineyard Avenue & Forest Park Boulevard

2.3.5.1 There are no speed limit or school zone signs along this portion, despite it’s proximity to the main school campus and roadway curvature.

2.3.6 Thames River Drive & Kiawah River Drive

2.3.6.1 No bike signage or markings are present in the roundabout. The bike lanes approaching the intersection drop off.

2.3.7 Thames River Drive & Indus Place

2.3.7.1 There are no truncated domes or tactile markings on the curb ramps.

2.3.7.2 There are no striped crosswalks at the intersection, despite being proximate to the entrance of Rio Vista Middle School.
1113

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

East-West Streets
Kiawah River Drive

2.4.1 Kiawah River Drive & Roja Lane

2.4.1.1 This intersection is two-way stop controlled (side-street controlled stopping movements on Roja Lane). Parents and community members indicated that at this location it can be difficult to see other motorists around parked cars and drivers can appear to speed on Kiawah River. Visibility for pedestrians in crosswalk is also low due to parked vehicles.

Indus Place

2.4.2 Indus Place & Shenandoah Drive

2.4.2.1 There is no red curb at this location. Cars were observed parking into the intersection and on to/obstructing curb ramps.

Forest Park Boulevard

2.4.3 Forest Park Boulevard & Thames River Drive

2.4.3.1 Curb ramps lack truncated domes or tactile warning pads on all curb ramps.

2.4.3.2 The pedestrian signals lack countdown timers in the “flashing don’t walk” phase.

2.4.3.3 The intersection has older-style pedestrian push buttons. 1114

2.5 Arrival and Dismissal Observations
The team observed arrival at two primary locations: the staff parking lot entrance and exit and the main parking lot drop-off zone closer to the roundabout at Thames River and Kiawah River Drive. One team member also observed the conditions at Vineyard and Thames River for a portion of the arrival period, as there is usually a crossing guard stationed there and with attendance boundary changes will have more students crossing from El Rio in the future.

General Observations:
- All students arrive through the main entrance in the morning hours.

Staff Parking Lot/Thames River:
- Two drop-offs in the bike lane were observed.
- The left turn movement out of the parking lot onto Thames River seemed difficult due to visibility from the curvature and median.
- The staff lot was parked up pretty early, peak congestion between 8:10 and 8:20am. - Both lanes of the main lot were blocked by 8:10am. Parents were observed leaving their car and not pulling up all the way.

Main Lot/Roundabout:
- Cars start to line up in the main lot at 7:40am.
- Curb lane was parked up, the outer lane was mostly flowing with drop-offs. - Some drop-offs were observed in the parking lot stalls - Lots of left turns were observed out of the main lot from the right lane. - A few dozen walkers were observed coming from the neighborhood. - Traffic accumulates northbound on Thames River and eastbound on Kiawah River at the roundabout
- Driver behavior was generally positive in terms of yielding to pedestrians at the crosswalks in the roundabout.
- Roundabout almost completely clear by 8:25am.
1115
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Rio Vista Middle School (6-8)
Prepared By:
1116

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Vineyard Avenue within the study area. Collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age largely clustered along Vineyard Avenue as well. There were six severe injury collisions that occurred along Vineyard Avenue. Two of the six collisions occurred near or at the intersection of Thames Park Drive and Vineyard Avenue. Another two injury collisions occurred at the intersection of Forest Park Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. 1117
Pedestrian collisions and bike collisions were primarily present along Vineyard Avenue as well, with hot spots at the intersections with Thames Park Drive and Forest Park Boulevard. 1118
Putting all the information together, there were six severe injury collisions present along Vineyard Avenue and concentrated at the intersections with Thames Park Drive and Forest Park Boulevard. There was one severe injury collision occurring along Forest Park Boulevard that did not involve a pedestrian, bicyclist, or someone under the age of 16. 1119

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 65 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Rio Vista Middle School. Seven collisions resulted in severe injury and there were no fatality collisions within the study area. Four of the severe injury collisions involved someone under the age of 16.

Collisions within the study area were prevalent along Vineyard Avenue and Forest Park Boulevard to the east and south of campus, respectively. The intersection of Vineyard Avenue and Forest Park Boulevard was a collision hot spot, with two severe injury collisions and seven injury collisions.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (23%), Traffic Signals and Signs (23%), and Unsafe Speed (20%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions occurred primarily along Vineyard Avenue. • Traffic Signals and Signs collisions occurred primarily along Vineyard Avenue and Forest Park Boulevard.
• Unsafe Speed collisions concentrated along Vineyard Avenue and Forest Park Boulevard as well.
1120
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Rio Vista Middle School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 65
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 7 (11%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 27 (42%) (KSI: 4 – 57% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 7 (11%) (KSI: 2 – 29% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 4 (6%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 15 23%
Traffic Signals and Signs 15 23%
Unsafe Speed 13 20%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 29 45%
Rear End 13 20%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 9 14%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 11 17%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 15 23%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 17 26%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 22 34%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 4 6%
Dark – Streetlights 20 31%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 39 60%
Dusk/Dawn 2 3%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 1 2%
No 64 98%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
1121
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Vineyard Avenue 58
Automobile Right of Way (14)
Traffic Signals and Signs (13)
Unsafe Speed (12)
Around 65% of these collisions
occurred during daylight hours. 24
of these collisions involved
someone under 16 years old. Six of
these collisions involved a
pedestrian.

There were six severe injury
collisions that occurred along
Vineyard Avenue. Three of the
severe injury collisions involved an
individual underage of 16 and two
involved a pedestrian.

Vineyard Avenue and Forest
Park Boulevard 9 Traffic Signals and Signs (3)
There were two severe injury
collisions present at the intersection
of Forest Park Boulevard and
Vineyard Boulevard (near south of
the School). Both the severe injury
collisions involved a pedestrian and
someone under the age of 16 due
to pedestrian violation.

Vineyard Avenue and Thames
River Drive 7 Traffic Signals and Signs (3)
There were two severe injury
collisions. One occurred at the
intersection of Thames River Drive
and Vineyard Boulevard, and one
occurred close to this intersection
(near north of the School).

Forest Park Boulevard 19 Traffic Signals and Signs (7)
Unsafe Speed (5)
Around half of these collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

There were three severe injury
collisions with two occurring at the
intersection of Forest Park
Boulevard and Vineyard Boulevard.
1122

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
1123
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard 240 21%
Running Red Light 17 79%
Running Stop Sign 16 6%
Speeding9 3%
Failure to Obey Crossing Guard3 1%
1124
• The majority of students come from Riverpark and Rio del Norte.

Approximately 18% of students walk, 0.5% bike, 7% carpool (with two or more students), 19% take the bus, 0.5% use public transit, and 55% are driven by adults. The latter group is likely made up of families who have transferred from outside the district.
• Key locations include: Thames River Drive/Simon Way & Vineyard Avenue crosswalk (crossing guard location), Forest Park Boulevard/Thames River Drive (adult supervision in afternoon), Forest Park Boulevard (bus drop-off and pick-up), and Thames River Drive (both parking lot and main-lot lanes used for drop off).
• Key issues include: students crossing, roadway(gridlocked), and parking in no-parking zone

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Robert Guynn, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
1125

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Friday, May 17, 2024
- Start time: 2:45 PM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Jose Rivera – City of Oxnard

2. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

3. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
1126

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Gottfried Place

2.3.1 Gottfried Place & Martin Luther King Jr. Drive

2.3.1.1 The crosswalks on all legs are standard. The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added for accessibility.

2.3.1.2 Parked cars were observed up to the intersection, limiting visibility of pedestrians in the crosswalk (Figure 3).

2.3.2 Gottfried Place & Sombra Drive

2.3.2.1 A high visibility crosswalk extends at an angle across Gottfried place due to a driveway into the Brekke parking lot where the south leg of the crosswalk would normally land on the east side of the street (Figure 4).

2.3.2.2 Just south of the intersection, pedestrians were observed crossing in the middle of the block where the facilities driveway to the playground is located.

2.3.2.3 Curb ramps lack truncated domes.

2.3.3 Gottfried Place & Cesar Chavez Drive

2.3.3.1 The crosswalks on all legs are standard crosswalk. The pavement markings are faded.

2.3.3.2 The curb ramps lack truncated domes.
1127
Teresa Street

2.3.4 Teresa Street & Rubio Circle

2.3.4.1 There is a small curb extension to a standard crosswalk on the north leg of the intersection across Teresa Street (Figure 6).

2.3.5 Teresa Street & Cesar Chavez Drive

2.3.5.1 The intersection has all-way stop controls, ladder-style high-visibility crosswalks, and upgraded curb ramps. Infrastructure at this location can be seen as a model for other stop- controlled intersections in the school vicinity.

East-West Streets
Forest Park Boulevard

2.3.6 Forest Park Boulevard & Vineyard Avenue

2.3.6.1 The north side sidewalk has an uplift that needs to be repaired, and there is no sidewalk on the eastern side of the intersection.

2.3.6.2 There is a ladder crosswalk on the west leg of the intersection.

2.3.6.3 There is no countdown timer, and the crossing speed is about 4.4 feet per second over a distance of 132 feet.

2.3.6.4 The total walk time is 30 seconds, with 6 seconds allocated for the initial walk phase.

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Vineyard Avenue

2.4.1 Vineyard Avenue & Collins Street

2.4.1.1 All existing ramps are in good condition and provide accessibility, but there is one missing on the northeast corner, along with a missing sidewalk.

2.4.1.2 There are no marked crosswalks; it is recommended to add high-visibility crosswalks.

2.4.2 Vineyard Avenue & Stroube Street

2.4.2.1 The sidewalk on the west side is incomplete and ends right at the intersection. A 1128
new ramp upgrade is needed at the southwest corner.

2.4.2.2 It is recommended to resurface the old school signs and markings with asphalt.

2.4.2.3 Continental crosswalks are present on all legs of the intersection. It is recommended to restripe them with high-visibility white paint.

2.4.2.4 The signal timing across Vineyard Avenue (a distance of about 114 feet) provides a 6-second walk phase and a total walk time of 31 seconds, which equates to a walking speed of 3.6 feet per second.

Riverpark Boulevard

2.4.3 Riverpark Boulevard/Garonne Street & Forest Park Boulevard

2.4.3.1 The standard crosswalks on all sides are standard and should be upgraded to high-visibility crosswalks.

2.4.3.2 The curb cuts/ramps are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.4.3.3 Pedestrian countdown timers are needed at the intersection.

2.4.3.4 The sidewalk is uplifted on the southside by Tempo at Riverpark and should be fixed to ensure accessibility.

Moonlight Park Avenue

2.4.4 Moonlight Park Avenue & Forest Park Boulevard

2.4.4.1 The curb cuts/ramps are missing truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.4.4.2 The crosswalks have a double threat, and they are in need of bike signs or markings.

Detroit Drive

2.4.5 Detroit Drive & Stroube Street

2.4.5.1 It is recommended to upgrade the ramps near the park entrance to ensure ADA compliance.

2.4.5.2 There are no stop sign controls or crosswalks at this intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control.

2.4.6 Detroit Drive & Iowa Place

2.4.6.1 It is recommended to resurface the drainage area and upgrade the ramps to ensure ADA compliance.

2.4.6.2 There are no stop sign controls or crosswalks at this intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control.

2.4.6.3 The landscaping on the east side of the intersection is overgrown. 1129

2.4.7 Detroit Drive & Juneau Place

2.4.7.1 There are no stop sign controls or crosswalks at this intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control.

2.4.8 Detroit Drive & Collins Street

2.4.8.1 There are no stop sign controls or crosswalks at this intersection. It is recommended to add a stop control.

2.4.8.2 The landscaping on the east side of the intersection is overgrown.

2.4.9 Detroit Drive & Louisiana Place

2.4.9.1 There are no markings indicating to reduce speeds at the curve. It is recommended to install slow curve markings and street signs to alert drivers. 1130

2.5 Dismissal Observations
The team observed student dismissal along Forest Park Boulevard at Thames River Drive and Vineyard Avenue. Thames River Drive was selected because, according to Principal Robert Guynn, most students come from Riverpark (Rio del Mar) and Rio del Norte (south of the 101). Students from El Rio cross Vineyard Avenue, typically at Forest Park, with the majority using the crossing guard at the Thames River/Simon intersection.

General Observations:
- The school has entrances facing Forest Park Boulevard, with drop-off and pick-up occurring on the south side of the campus. There is minimal interaction with parent traffic on the north side.
- Students cross midblock to reach the street vendor and parents parked on southbound Thames River Drive.
- There are concerns about students crossing the street to reach the vendor. - The campus opens at 7:15 a.m. for zero period, with up to 60 students attending. The remaining students gradually arrive until 8:50 a.m.

Thames River Drive & Forest Park Boulevard:
- At 2:45 p.m., vehicles are already in the queue.
- Dismissal begins at 3:15 p.m., with curb parking clearing by around 3:25 p.m. The area is fully clear by 3:30 p.m.
- During pre-dismissal, one car entered the exit-only driveway. - About five kids were observed riding bikes.
- People were gathered in the park area with younger children, waiting. - Almost no pedestrians were seen crossing the driveway. - The park, with a vendor, serves as a good overflow area. - The roundabouts are effective for making U-turns.
- Cars were backing up in the southbound lane of Thames River Drive.

Forest Park Boulevard & Vineyard Avenue:
- People began queuing at 2:45 p.m.
- Buses were observed arriving at 3:10 p.m., with five others arriving at 5-minute intervals. - There is minimal dismissal occurring at the back of the school. - Approximately 50 to 60 kids cross Thames River Drive. - On Vineyard Avenue, only about six students crossed from Forest Park to Walnut Drive. 1131
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Sunkist Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
1132

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Spruce Street and Ventura Road within the study area.

Additionally, collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age were concentrated along Ventura Road. The study area recorded no collisions that resulted in a severe injury or fatality.

Note: Collision data was only analyzed within the City of Oxnard. Therefore, the maps in this section do not include any collision trends outside the City boundary south of Bryce Canyon and west of Ventura Road.
1133
The sole pedestrian collision within the study area occurred at the intersection of Spruce Street and Ventura Road. There were three bicycle collisions: one along Ventura Road and two along Teakwood Street.
1134
Putting all the information together, collisions within the study area were concentrated along Ventura Road and Spruce Street. The study area recorded no collisions that resulted in a severe injury or fatality.
1135

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 17 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Sunkist Elementary School. The study area recorded no collisions that resulted in a severe injury or fatality. Approximately one-third of the collisions involved someone under the age of 16, and these collisions were highly concentrated on Ventura Road.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Unsafe Speed (24%), Automobile Right of Way (24%), and Improper Turning (24%).
• Automobile Right of Way collisions were spread throughout the study area. • Unsafe Speed collisions occurred primarily along Spruce Street. • Improper Turning collisions were all present along Ventura Road. 1136
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Sunkist Elementary School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 17
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 0 (0%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 6 (35%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions)
Pedestrian-Involved 1 (6%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 3 (18%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 4 24%
Improper Turning 4 24%
Unsafe Speed 4 24%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 8 47%
Sideswipe 3 18%
Rear End 2 12%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 3 18%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 6 35%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 7 41%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 1 6%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 1 6%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 15 88%
Dusk/Dawn 1 6%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 0 0%
No 17 100%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
1137
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Spruce Street 6 Unsafe Speed (2)
Five out of the six collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

None of these collisions resulted in
a severe injury or fatality. Two of the
collisions involved someone under
the age of 16, and one involved a
pedestrian.

Ventura Road 6 Improper Turning (3)
Half of the six collisions occurred
during daylight hours. None of
these collisions resulted in a severe
injury or fatality. Two of the
collisions involved someone under
the age of 16, and one involved a
pedestrian.
1138

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.

Note: Citation data was only analyzed within the City of Oxnard. Therefore, the maps in this section do not include any citation trends outside the City boundary south of Bryce Canyon and west of Ventura Road.
1139
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Running Stop Sign5 100%
1140
• Most students live in the surrounding neighborhood. Most students get dropped off by a vehicle, about 80% drive, and few to no student’s bike regularly. Bus services are provided for students with special needs. • Key locations include: Teakwood Street (school entrance, staff parking lot, pick-up/drop-off lane), Teakwood Street & Napa Street (crossing guard and rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) location), Teakwood Street & N Street (RRFB location)
• Key issues include: bus blockages, congestion, illegal U-turn maneuvers, and parking in unassigned areas

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Cyndi Delgado, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
1141

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Thursday, May 16, 2024
- Start time: 1:45 PM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

2. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
1142

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

East-West Streets
Teakwood Street

2.3.1 Teakwood Street & Alleys

2.3.1.1 It is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps and repave the alley to improve accessibility.

2.3.2 Teakwood Street & N Street

2.3.2.1 There is a ladder crosswalk on the western leg of the intersection. It is recommended to stripe the crosswalk on the northern leg.

2.3.2.2 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added and new street signs.

2.3.2.3 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers and to add drainage.

2.3.3Teakwood Street & Napa Street

2.3.3.1 There is a ladder crosswalk on the eastern leg of the intersection. It is recommended to stripe the crosswalk on the northern leg.

2.3.3.2 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added and new street signs.

2.3.3.3 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers and to add drainage.

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
C Street

2.4.1 C Street & Teakwood Street

2.4.1.1 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.4.1.2 Curb extensions or medians are recommended to provide enough space for upgrading and ensuring compliance of the curb ramps.
1143

2.4.2 C Street & Bryce Canyon Avenue

2.4.2.1 There is a stop control on the west bound approach of Bryce Canyon Avenue with a small stop sign, which should be replaced with a larger one for better visibility.

2.4.2.2 It is recommended to stripe the crosswalks on the north and south leg.

2.4.2.3 Curb extensions are recommended where needed to reduce the crossing distance.

2.4.3 C Street & Spruce Street

2.4.3.1 There is a stop control on the east bound approach of Spruce Street with a small stop sign, which should be replaced with a larger one for better visibility.

2.4.3.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.4.3.3 Curb extensions are recommended where needed to reduce the crossing distance.

M Street

2.4.4 M Street between Alley and Redwood Street

2.4.4.1 It is recommended to repave the sidewalk for accessibility.

2.4.5 M Street & Spruce Street

2.4.5.1 The east-west approaches of the intersection have stop controls, but there are no crosswalks. It is recommended to add high-visibility yellow crosswalks on both the east and west legs.

2.4.5.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.6 M Street & Teakwood Street

2.4.6.1 The curb cuts/ramps on the southern corners of the intersection are missing truncated domes, which should be added to enhance accessibility.

2.4.6.2 The intersection has an all-way stop control and standard crosswalks on the north and west legs. It is recommended to stripe the crosswalk on the south leg and upgrade the crosswalks on the north and west legs to high visibility.

2.4.6.3 The fire hydrant on the northeastern corner is obstructing the pedestrian path on the sidewalk.

East-West Streets
Teakwood Street

2.4.7 Teakwood Street & Monterey Street

2.4.7.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.
1144

2.4.7.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers and to add a high visibility crosswalk on the northern leg.

2.4.7.3 The drainage system at the intersection requires repairs.

2.4.8 Teakwood Street & Lassen Street

2.4.8.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.8.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.8.3 The landscaping on the north side of Eastern Lassen is overgrown.

2.4.9 Teakwood Street & L Street

2.4.9.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.9.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.10 Teakwood Street & Kern Street

2.4.10.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.10.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.11 Teakwood Street & K Street

2.4.11.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.11.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.12 Teakwood Street & Jackson Street

2.4.12.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.12.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.13 Teakwood Street & J Street

2.4.13.1 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.4.13.2 Curb extensions are recommended to align and improve the visibility on the northern leg.

2.4.13.3 It is recommended to upgrade the crosswalk on the north leg to high visibility and 1145
add striping to the crosswalks on the west and east legs.

2.4.13.4 The vegetation on the east side of J street is overgrown.

2.4.14 Teakwood Street & G Street

2.4.14.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.14.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.15 Teakwood Street & F Street

2.4.15.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.15.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers and add drainage improvements across F Street.

2.4.16 Teakwood Street & E Street

2.4.16.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.16.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

2.4.17 Teakwood Street & D Street

2.4.17.1 No stop sign controls are present at this intersection. It is recommended that a stop control be added.

2.4.17.2 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.

Redwood Street

2.4.18 Redwood Street & J Street

2.4.18.1 The curb cut/ramp on the northwestern corner lacks a truncated dome, which should be added to improve accessibility. Additionally, the southwestern corner requires a new curb ramp.

2.4.18.2 Upgrade the crosswalk on the northern leg to high visibility crosswalk and widen the crosswalk into the street to create a clear path of travel.

2.4.18.3 It is recommended to add striping to the crosswalks on the west and east legs.

2.1.1 Redwood Street & Jackson Street

2.4.18.4 There is a stop control on the south bound approach of Jackson Street with a small stop sign, which should be replaced with a larger one for better visibility. 1146

2.4.18.5 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.1.2 Redwood Street & Lassen Street

2.1.2.1 There is a stop control on the south bound approach of Lassen Street with a small stop sign, which should be replaced with a larger one for better visibility.

2.1.2.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.1.3 Redwood Street & M Street

2.1.3.1 The intersection has an all-way stop control and is upgraded to stripe the east and west leg crosswalks.

2.1.3.2 The curb cuts/ramps lack truncated domes, which should be added to improve accessibility.

2.1.3.3 It is recommended to daylight the intersection with red curbs to improve visibility for drivers.
1147

2.5 Dismissal Observations
The team observed arrival along Teakwood Street entrance. Principal Cyndi Delgado mentioned the school used to have two gates open but due to budget cuts the entrance on 6th Street is now closed.

The drop-off/pick-up lane located in the staff parking lot is not monitored during dismissal, also due to budget cuts.

General Observations:
- The school has an entrance facing Teakwood Street (where all students are dismissed) and a staff parking lot (with drop off/pick up lane.

Teakwood Street & M Street:
- Pedestrians with strollers were approaching from the east of Teakwood Street. - Parking in the nearby alley affected visibility.
- More red curb is needed along this segment.
- Most people were using the marked crosswalks, but some were crossing on the southern leg of M Street and Teakwood Street. It is recommended to stripe the crosswalk on the southern leg of M Street.
- A pedestrian was walking up from the back side of Sunkist Elementary School. - There was heavy vehicle traffic from all sides of Teakwood Street. - Pedestrian traffic came from the front of Sunkist Elementary School, crossing all legs to points in northeastern Oxnard.
- The heaviest pedestrian traffic occurred during the 2:30 PM dismissal. - There were unaccompanied children on foot.

Teakwood Street & Napa Street:
- There was good compliance at the rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) and at locations where drivers are required to yield to crossing guards. - There is no sidewalk at the driveway entry, causing pedestrians to walk in the travel lanes. - Some behavior issues were observed, such as pedestrians crossing midblock, drivers making illegal U-turns, people not pressing the RRFB button, and individuals using the staff area.
- Cars were parked in the area at 1:50 p.m.
- For the TK/Kinder pickup, parents start arriving at 1:53 p.m. and gather by 1:57 p.m. - Two buses in the staff parking lot leave at 2:02 p.m., and the crossing guard arrives shortly after.
1148
- A steady stream of arrivals continues until 2:05 p.m. - U-turns are observed in the alley.
- The TK/Kinder pickup process concludes by 2:07 p.m.
- The main pickup for grades 1-5 begins at 2:10 p.m.
- Several groups are not using the RRFB as intended.
- Cars are parked in the area again by 2:30 p.m., and there is crossing activity at the school driveway.
- The driveway backs up onto Teakwood Street at 2:33 p.m. - A car crash occurs as a vehicle turns right from the north onto Teakwood Street, accompanied by honking.
- Illegal U-turns are a significant issue between Napa and M Street. 1149
City of Oxnard
Safe Routes to School
Tierra Vista Elementary School (TK-5)
Prepared By:
1150

1. Collision and Citation Trends

1.1 Collision Trends
Collisions were prevalent along Pleasant Valley Road and Rose Avenue within the study area.

Collisions involving individuals under 16 years of age largely clustered along Pleasant Valley Road and Rose Avenue as well. There was one severe injury collision that occurred at the intersection of Syracuse Drive and Nashville Place and one fatality collision present along Pleasant Valley Road.
1151
Pedestrian collisions concentrated at the intersection of Rose Avenue and Pleasant Valley Road.

There were two bicycle collisions. One occurred at the intersection of Rose Avenue and Pleasant Valley Road. The other occurred at the intersection of Lincoln Court and Syracuse Drive. 1152
Putting all the information together, there was one fatality collision that involved someone under the age of 16 and a pedestrian (along Pleasant Valley Road). A severe injury collision was present at the intersection of Syracuse Drive and Nashville Place, which did not involve a pedestrian, bicyclist, or someone under the age of 16.
1153

1.2 Injury Collision Summary
There were 28 injury collisions between 2018-2022 within a quarter mile radius of Tierra Vista Elementary School. One resulted in a severe injury, and one resulted in a fatality. The fatality collision involved an individual under 16 years of age and a pedestrian. There were five collisions involving a pedestrian and two involving a bicyclist. Concentrations of collisions occurred along Pleasant Valley Road, Rose Avenue and Syracuse Drive.

Action During Collisions
The leading violations were Automobile Right of Way (21%), Unsafe Speed (18%), and Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug (14%). • Automobile Right of Way collisions occurred primarily along Pleasant Valley Road and Syracuse Drive.
• Unsafe Speed collisions occurred primarily along Pleasant Valley Road and Rose Avenue.
• Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drug collisions exclusively occurred along Rose Avenue.
1154
Injury Collision Summary Table
Injury Collision Summary within ¼ Mile of Tierra Vista Elementary School (2018 – 2022) Total Injury Collisions 28
KSI (Killed or Seriously Injured)
Collisions 2 (7%)
Collisions with victim under 16
years old 11 (20%) (KSI: 1 – 50% of all KSI collisions) Pedestrian-Involved 5 (2%) (KSI: 1 – 50% of all KSI collisions) Bicycle-Involved 2 (4%) (KSI: 0 – 0% of all KSI collisions) Top Violations
Count Percent of Total
Automobile Right of Way 6 21%
Unsafe Speed 5 18%
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
4 14%
Top Crash Types
Count Percent of Total
Broadside 6 21%
Rear End 6 21%
Head-On 4 14%
Time of Day
Count Percent of Total
Morning Peak (6AM-10AM) 5 18%
Midday (10AM-3PM) 4 14%
Evening Peak (3PM-7PM) 9 32%
Overnight (7PM-6AM) 10 36%
Streetlight Conditions
Count Percent of Total
Dark – No Streetlights 0 0%
Dark – Streetlights 7 25%
Dark – Streetlights Not Functioning 0 0%
Daylight 19 68%
Dusk/Dawn 2 7%
Alcohol/Drug Involvement
Count Percent of Total
Yes 4 14%
No 24 86%
Note: Times in Bold are when school is in session.
1155
Time of Day and Location Table
Street (Intersection/Corridor) Number of
Collisions Top Factors Notes
Pleasant Valley Road 20 Unsafe Speed (5)
Automobile Right of Way (4)
Around half of these collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

There was one fatality collision
occurred on Pleasant Valley Road
between Syracuse Drive and
Beaumont Avenue. Nine of these
collisions involved someone under
16 years old.

Pleasant Valley Road and Rose
Avenue 5 Traffic Signals and Signs (2)
There was one pedestrian collision
and one bicyclist collision occurring
at this intersection.

Rose Avenue 14
Unsafe Speed (4)
Driving or Bicycling Under the
Influence of Alcohol or Drug
(4)
Around half of these collisions
occurred during daylight hours.

There were six collisions along Rose
Avenue involving someone under
the age of 16.

Syracuse Drive 9 Automobile Right of Way (5)
There was one severe injury
collision occurring at the
intersection of Syracuse Drive and
Nashville Place due to unsafe
starting or backing at evening peak
hour.
1156

1.3 Citation Trends
This analysis includes roadway safety-related Oxnard Police Department citations from 2016 – 2022 within a quarter mile of the school boundary.
1157
Citation Type Count Percent of Total
Improper Turning4 50%
Running Stop Sign4 50%
1158
• Most students live in the surrounding neighborhood.
• 20-30% of students are getting to/from school by taking the provided school bus. 40-50% of students walk to school accompanied by family members. 20-30% are dropped off in a vehicle. A handful of students, 5 approximately, ride bikes to school. There is a bike rack at Gate C.
• The students that live south of Pleasant Valley generally walk to school while those that live north are dropped off.
• Key locations include: Syracuse Drive & Sanford Street crosswalk (Gate B location), Sanford Street crosswalk (staff member location), Sanford Street staff parking lot and entrance, and Syracuse Drive drop off lane. • Key issues include: conflict with drop-off zone and need for improved visibility.

2. Walk Audit
The purpose of the walk audit is to understand existing conditions for students walking and biking to/from school and for drop off and pick up in order to identify opportunities for infrastructure, programmatic, and operational safety improvements. During the walk audit, the team also observed circulation patterns to identify key routes to school.

Before the walk audit, injury collision data from 2018-2022 and citation data from 2016-2022 were analyzed to understand key trends, such as top violations and crash types for all injury collisions and for injury collisions involving people walking, biking, and anyone under 16 years of age. The collision analysis focused on approximately a quarter mile around the school as student travel activity becomes concentrated closer to the school.

2.1 Pre-Walk Audit Activities
In preparation for the walk audit, the SRTS team held a kick-off meeting with key school staff, including Principal Karla Roberto, to discuss the walk audit schedule and walking route. The discussion covered how students travel to/from school, the preferred routes approaching/ departing school, key physical and perceived barriers, and challenges and successes for arrival/ dismissal activity.

The team learned:
1159

2.2 Walk Audit Details
The collision and citation analysis and findings from the pre-walk audit virtual meeting were used to guide the planning of the audit routes. Figure 1 illustrates the walk audit route.

Figure 1. Walk audit route
Other details of the walk audit are presented below:
- Walk Audit Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2024
- Start time: 7:00 AM
- Weather Conditions: Clear and sunny
- Events/Unique Conditions: None
- Attendees:

1. Jose River – City of Oxnard

2. Andy Meger – Fehr & Peers

3. Chelsea Richer – Fehr & Peers
1160

2.3 School Perimeter Observations
School perimeter observations refer to observations made along streets that are immediately adjacent to the school property.

North-South Streets
Syracuse Drive

2.3.1 Syracuse Drive between Sanford Street & Peoria Place

2.3.1.1 At 7:25 AM the parent drop begins off at gate A. It is recommended to replace the “parking” sign.

2.3.1.2 Parents that are traveling south bound the drive make U-turns to pull into the parking lane.

2.3.1.3 Some of the parents that approach the school from the south bound lane of Syracuse Drive, park and hop out their cars to walk their kids across the street.

East-West Streets
Sanford Street

2.3.2 Sanford Street between Syracuse Drive and Beaumont Avenue

2.3.2.1 On the north side of Beaumont Avenue, the sidewalk is uplifted in front of the school and there are empty tree wells. It is recommended to repair the sidewalk and add trees. Additionally, considering closing the driveway and reconstructing sidewalk to allow for a ramp landing.

2.3.2.2 On the south side of Beaumont Avenue, the sidewalk is uplifted and is recommended for it to be repaired
1161

2.4 Walkshed Observations
The “walkshed” refers to areas that are outside of the perimeter of the school, but approximately within a quarter mile distance of the school.

North-South Streets
Tulsa Drive

2.4.1 Tulsa Drive & Peoria Avenue

2.4.1.1 This is a 3-way uncontrolled intersection. A stop control is recommended for a minor lag for vehicular traffic.

Syracuse Drive

2.4.2 Syracuse Drive & Nashville Place

2.4.2.1 The curb has a large radius and there are bad sight lines. It is recommended to set up a square intersection, move the stop sign, add a red curb, and upgrade the curb ramps.

2.4.3 Syracuse Drive between Lincoln Court & Nashville Place

2.4.3.1 There is a sidewalk uplift on the west side of the drive. It is recommended for the sidewalk to be repaired along the segment.

2.4.4 Syracuse Drive & Lincoln Court

2.4.4.1 Two of the four curb ramps at the intersection need upgrades and the stop sign is obscured. It is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps and add a red curb for daylighting at the intersection.

Reeder Avenue

2.4.5 Reeder Avenue & Langley Street

2.4.5.1 At the intersection, there is a hydrant but no red curb. It is recommended to daylight the intersection by adding a red curb leaving a clear line of sight.

2.4.6 Reeder Avenue & Barnett Street

2.4.6.1 At the intersection, there is a hydrant but no red curb and no curb ramps. It is recommended to daylight the intersection and upgrade the curb ramps.

2.4.7 Reeder Avenue & Brigham Street

2.4.7.1 At the intersection, there is a hydrant but no red curb and no curb ramps. It is recommended to daylight the intersection and upgrade the curb ramps.

2.4.8 Reeder Avenue & Abbott Street

2.4.8.1 At the intersection, there is a hydrant but no red curb. It is recommended to daylight the intersection by adding a red curb leaving a clear line of sight.

2.4.9 Reeder Avenue & Vanetta Street
1162

2.4.9.1 At the intersection, there is a hydrant but no red curb. It is recommended to daylight the intersection by adding a red curb leaving a clear line of sight.

2.4.10 Reeder Avenue & Sweetland Street

2.4.10.1 At the intersection, there is a hydrant but no red curb and no curb ramps. It is recommended to daylight the intersection and upgrade the curb ramps.

East-West Streets
Sanford Street

2.4.11 Sanford Street between Tulsa Drive & Syracuse Drive

2.4.11.1 There is a sidewalk uplift on the south side of the street. It is recommended for the sidewalk to be repaired along the segment.

2.4.12 Sanford Street & Beaumont Avenue

2.4.12.1 The intersection has standard crosswalks all around. It is recommended for them to be upgraded to have high visibility crosswalks.

2.4.12.2 The curb ramps are small, and it is recommended to daylight the intersection by adding red curbs.

Curran Street

2.4.13 Curran Street & Beaumont Avenue

2.4.13.1 The intersection has a wide crossing, and it is curved at the approach. It is recommended to add curb extensions or increase the curb radius.

2.4.13.2 There are no red curbs at the intersection. It is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps and add the red curb.

2.4.14 Curran Street between Beaumont Avenue & Reeder Avenue

2.4.14.1 On the north side of Beaumont Avenue, the sidewalk is uplifted. It is recommended for the sidewalk to be reconstructed to remove driveway.

Pleasant Valley Road

2.4.15 Pleasant Valley Road & Syracuse Drive

2.4.15.1 It is recommended to upgrade the curb ramps and tighten the curb radius.

2.4.16 Pleasant Valley Road between Syracuse Drive & Beaumont Avenue

2.4.16.1 The sidewalk is uplifted on the south side, and it is recommended for it to be repaired.

2.4.16.2 There is a Class II bike lane on a 45-mph segment.

2.4.17 Pleasant Valley Road between Beaumont Avenue & Bard Road

2.4.17.1 There is a conflict between the bike lane markings and the right turn lane.

2.4.18 Pleasant Valley Road & Beaumont Avenue
1163

2.4.18.1 It is recommended for the curb ramps to be upgraded

2.4.18.2 The signal timing at the intersection is too short. It is recommended for it to be adjusted to comply.
1164

2.5 Arrival Observations
The team observed the area near the intersection of Sanford Street and Syracuse Drive. This location is close to Gate B, which is primarily used for kindergarteners, and near Gate A on Syracuse Drive, as noted by Principal Karla Roberto. It was mentioned as well that the first school bus typically arrives at 7:10 AM, while the gates open at 7:25 AM. The buses use the main parking lot for their drop-off loop, but the secondary parking lot is always gated. There is a designated drop-off lane marked with cones, and a staff member is usually present at the crosswalk on Sanford.

General Observations:
- Cars begin queuing at 7:25 AM, with some students being dropped off. Traffic continues to flow steadily until 7:50 AM.

Sanford Drive:
- There is no designated crosswalk on Sanford, but there is a red curb marked with cones on the south side. A crossing guard is not present at Sanford until 7:30 AM, which means students are crossing the street on their own before that time. Some cars block traffic by driving in front of the cones. Approximately 10 to 15 students cross from the south side of Sanford, but most arrive on the north side of the street. - From 7:35 AM to 7:40 AM, the flow of cars increases, and midblock U-turns become more frequent. After 7:40 AM, the crossing guard tries to manage the speed of vehicles, but many drivers dropping off students block the crosswalk. Traffic continues to flow steadily until 7:50 AM. After that, it picks up again, and cars begin to double-park along the street segment. Additionally, many students are not using the crosswalk. 1165

CITY OF OXNARD
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM REPORT | AUGUST 2025
1166
Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Report
City Council
January 6, 2026
Jose Rivera
Associate Engineer
1167
That the City Council receive and file the City’s Safe Routes to School Report.

RECOMMENDATION 2
1168
The Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program is a federally established initiative developed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) with the objective of enhancing the safety, accessibility, and overall experience for students walking and bicycling to and from school.
❖ Local and regional agencies developed SRTS programs to create:
➢ Non-infrastructure recommendations (e.g., educational outreach and walk audits).
➢ Infrastructure recommendations (e.g., sidewalks, crosswalks). ❖ These programs focus on neighborhoods around schools serving all grade levels.

BACKGROUND 3
1169
❖ The City of Oxnard partnered with Fehr & Peers, Inc. to develop a comprehensive SRTS program aimed to increase safety and promote healthy and active modes of transportation for students.

BACKGROUND 4
2022
The City Council expanded the
program with $334,137.50 from the
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
funding.
2021
The City received a $300,000 Active
Transportation Program (ATP) grant
with support from the Ventura County
Transportation Commission (VCTC).

The grant was used to develop a SRTS program for
26 schools in the Oxnard School District and Oxnard
Union High School District.

The expansion included the remaining 25 schools in
the Rio Elementary, Ocean View, and Hueneme
Elementary School Districts.
1170
❖ The SRTS program was developed utilizing the Five “E’s”:

DISCUSSION 5
1171
ENGINEERING - INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS 6
Sidewalk improvements along Etting Rd near Mar Vista and Ocean View Schools 1172
EDUCATION & ENCOURAGEMENT 7
Bike assembly at Laguna Soria School Pedestrian safety assembly at Ramona School 1173
EDUCATION & ENCOURAGEMENT 8
Rio del Mar School
“Walking bus” on Walk to school day
Oxnard Public Library
2024 Art competition exhibition
1174
EDUCATION & ENCOURAGEMENT 9
Driffill Elementary School
Bike skills workshop
Kamala Elementary School
Pedestrian safety assembly
1175
ENFORCEMENT AND EVALUATION 10
Example of illegal parking Walk audit observation during school dismissal 1176
WALK AUDITS 11
The City of Oxnard along
with Fehr & Peers, Inc.
conducted a total of 51 walk
audits from 2021 - 2024.
1177
WALK AUDITS OBSERVATIONS 12
Lemonwood Elementary McAuliffe Elementary
RJ Frank Academy
Haycox Elementary
1178
WALK AUDITS OBSERVATIONS 13
Brekke School Juan Laguna Soria School
Ramona School Larsen School
1179
❖ The final SRTS program produced the following outcomes:

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS AND OUTCOMES 14
Vestibulum congue
tempus
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit, sed do
eiusmod tempor.

Vestibulum congue
tempus
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit, sed do
eiusmod tempor.

OPERAL

KEY ROUTE MAP
● A map for each school
with the most direct path
to school from the
neighborhood.

RECOMMENDATIONS
● Infrastructure
● Programmatic
● Operational

ONE-PAGE SUMMARY
● Key infrastructure
recommendations
1180

RECOMMENDATIONS
● Infrastructure
● Programmatic
● Operational

RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS
KEY RECOMMENDATIONS AND OUTCOMES 15
Vestibulum congue
tempus
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit, sed do
eiusmod tempor.

OPERAL

RECOMMENDATIONS
1181
KEY RECOMMENDATIONS AND OUTCOMES 16
Vestibulum congue
tempus
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit, sed do
eiusmod tempor.

Vestibulum congue
tempus
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit, sed do
eiusmod tempor.

OPERAL

KEY ROUTE MAP
● A map for each school
with the most direct path
to school from the
neighborhood.
1182
KEY RECOMMENDATIONS AND OUTCOMES 17
03 PROGRAMS ● Coordinate with GCT to promote student programs ● Promote after-school programs (Boys & Girls Club)
02 SCHOOL OPERATIONS
● Increase school staff during arrival and dismissal
● Training for school crossing guards
● Stagger arrival/dismissal times to reduce congestion
01 INFRASTRUCTURE
● Upgrade existing crosswalks
● Add curb extensions/bulb outs
● Extend walk signal phase during school rush hours
The recommendations to improve the existing conditions for the students in the City fall within three categories:

SRTS program recommendations are categorized by level of effort. ➢ Higher-effort projects are flagged for further study, funding, and extended timelines.
➢ Long-term improvements are opportunities to enhance safety and accessibility near schools.
1183
There is no financial impact in receiving and filing this report.

FINANCIAL IMPACT 18
1184

QUESTIONS
19 1185

← All documents from this meeting