Pacific Grove City Council
June 7, 2023

10 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 existing rip-rap revetment is marginally stable when compared with wave force analysis under present day stillwater levels. If sea level rise increases the stillwater level by nearly 2 feet as predicted in the coming 50 years (2072) the rip rap revetment structure will be considerably undersized for the wave forces. Undersized rip rap revetment structures are prone to having their boulders plucked by waves and ultimately slump to a flatter slope gradient becoming less effective. Since the existing revetment sits at a relatively flat gradient at present increased runup and overtopping will be the most prevalent change in the future. Actual sea level rise measured from tidal gauges over the past several decades indicate a much slower rate of sea level rise. However larger increments of sea level rise may occur as melting of ice sheets or other contributing factors occur in the future. Our conclusion is that we expect the existing revetment at the current slope gradient of 10H:1V will continue to perform well for 50 years. As the Stillwater level increases over time the revetment will slowly become less effective at reducing wave runup and overtopping and greater wave forces will occur against the concrete pier structure. Ultimately the revetment will need to be reinforced with a layer of larger quarry stones or precast concrete elements (e.g., dolos, tetra pods, tribars etc.) Refer to Appendix C for an inventory spreadsheet and rip-rap sizing calculations.

The pier is performing as expected for a massive gravity structure founded partly on concrete rubble and rip-rap and partly on granite bedrock. The gravity structure is comprised of interbedded layers of concrete, a matrix of concrete bonded to rip rap, and rip rap rock. There are void and joints within and between the interbedded layers. Some of the concrete is very punky/weak. The entire pier was renovated in the early 1980’s with reinforced concrete walls and slabs on the upper and lower decks. These renovations encased the weaker concrete and rip rap matrix that makes up most of the gravity structure.

The reinforced concrete walls and slabs provide a protective layer for the much weaker legacy material making up the mass. The reinforced concrete improvements included iron and carbon rebar which has corroded and expanded overtime resulting in severe cracking and spalling of the concrete further exposing rebar. The rebar hangars supporting the concrete walls are severely corroded at the east end of the upper deck and a panel of concrete dislodged and fell into the ocean during a large wave event. The gravity structure is not in danger of a catastrophic failure at this time. However, as the reinforced concrete walls continue to fail exposing more of the vulnerable core of the gravity structure, we expect that the rate of deterioration will accelerate. In other words, this damage will only get worse in the coming decade, if nothing is done to reinforce and stabilize the core of the gravity structure.

APPENDIX A to this MEMORANDUM shows numerous photographs of specific conditions found along the pier that warrant action.

Recommendations:

If nothing is done, then: a) Damage will continue as well as accelerate; b) Concrete debris will remain in the ocean water and more will follow; and c) Use of the pier by the public will be beyond an ordinary level of risk.

Ordinary risk is defined as the following:
 Failures only affecting owners/occupants of a structure rather than a substantial population.  No significant potential for loss of life or serious physical injury.  No collapse of structures; structural damage limited to repairable damage in most cases.

This alternative may present an unacceptable level of risk to the City assuming the pier would remain accessible for use by the public.

Appendix A to this Memorandum includes a detailed description of various elements of the pier, their location, our observation of their condition, problems that we noted, and conceptual recommendations that can be solutions to those problems.

PGCC 6-7-2023

11 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 In addition to this Memorandum, we (HKA) have prepared a set of short-term ("Interim") repair plans for the pier which will remediate most of the problems with the pier for the near future (10 or perhaps 20 years). Those plans will be submitted separately.

Removing concrete debris should be considered. This includes the pieces of concrete fascia resting on the seafloor in shallow water, as well as loose pieces of fascia that are partly detached from the pier structure. The concrete in the ocean water appears to have been colonized with marine life, and the disturbance associated removal of part or all of it is likely to do more harm than good. Loose pieces of fascia that are partly detached from the pier structure can be removed with a small crane or perhaps an excavator operated from the intact part of the concrete pier deck. A workman would likely need to assist to place slings around or anchor bolts into the concrete debris pieces so they can be lifted, placed in a truck, and transported to an appropriate disposal site. This alternative is environmentally appropriate.

Development and installation of a short-term repair (an "Interim" repair) is warranted as soon as possible.

This includes:

A. Monitor surf forecasts and close the entire pier to public use for temporary periods of time if adverse (dangerous) conditions are forecast. If wave overtopping of the pier deck or large waves are forecast during king tide periods, close the pier to public use. Monitoring should include tidal conditions, ocean swell size, direction, and period; This is prudent to maintain an acceptable level of risk.

B. Monitor future deterioration until the short-term "Interim" repair work is completed. This involves periodically inspecting the condition of the pier to assess if future damage is occurring. This is prudent no matter which other actions are taken. As part of the monitoring, supplemental recommendations should be made to the City, so those can be implemented as appropriate.

C. Design and installation of a new structural fascia that wraps around the tip of the pier and allows restoration of public use of the tip of the pier. The fascia should act as a short-term structural element as well as a cosmetic surfacing that matches the adjacent concrete surfaces. Inclusion of soil nail restraints within the fascia to enable it to act as a long-term retaining structure has been considered; however, this is more appropriate for consideration during development of a longterm repair plan for the pier.

D. Replacement of the concrete at the edges of and the tip of the pier with a sound concrete edge beam that replaces the cracked and split concrete there.

E. Replacement of the fencing along the margins of the pier, with the new fencing founded in the new concrete edge beam, which should be done in a manner that prevents corrosion of the fencing material from damaging the concrete. The fence posts should be embedded in the concrete in a manner that will minimize the chances of wave impact loading on the fence resulting in causing the edge beam to crack.

F. Replacement of the concrete slab on the seaward 75 feet of the upper pier deck.

G. Replacement of the concrete slab on the entire lower pier deck.

H. Reforming and resurfacing the stairs that extend into the water from the lower pier deck surface in a code compliant manner. A stainless-steel handrail should be provided.

I. Further evaluation of the stairs that extend from the upper pier deck surface to the lower pier deck surface by a structural engineer. If they must be replaced, that should be done in a code compliant manner. A stainless-steel handrail should be provided. If the structural engineer deems that repairs will be sufficient to allow use of the stairs, they should define those.

J. Consideration of whether a code compliant guard should be installed at the perimeter of the lower pier deck surface where there is an abrupt drop off into the ocean.

K. Maintaining new fencing in a location far enough landward of the damaged part of the pier so that users of the pier are only able to access the stable part of the pier. This involves placement of a new fence to prevent access to approximately the seaward 10 feet of the pier.

L. Further evaluation of the small building that is on the approach to the pier by a structural engineer. If it is unsafe to enter and must be replaced, that should be done in a code compliant manner. If the structural engineer deems that repairs will be sufficient to allow use of the building, PGCC 6-7-2023

12 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 they should define those. As an alternative the structure could be resurfaced with reinforced concrete and infilled with control density fill.

Long Term Repair Alternatives
Over the next 50 years the Lovers Point Pier will be subjected to an increase in sea-level rise, storm surge, wave runup, wave overtopping, and wave impact forces. We expect that the portion of the rip rap revetment at a 10H:1V slope gradient will perform well for the next 30 years. The pier structures even with the interim repairs implemented should be expected to deteriorate over the next couple of decades to the point that it will need to be repaired again with a similar interim concept or completely replaced with a new coastal structure. During this time frame the repair should be monitored at the beginning and end of each winter storm season as well as at the end of each large wave event accompanied with hightides. The monitoring should be conducted by a registered civil or structural engineer specializing in marine structures.

The interim repair will provide adequate time for an investigation, alternatives analysis, design, community outreach, permitting, and construction of a replacement coastal structure. We have developed several alternatives for the long-term repair of the pier structure for consideration. Each repair alternative will require a specific type of investigation:

Long-Term Repair Alternative 1. Total removal of the existing pier and rip-rap revetment and construction of a new wharf supported by deep foundations. The wharf would occupy a similar footprint to that of the existing pier. This alternative is not recommended because it would allow wave and tidal movement to propagate beneath the wharf and disrupt the littoral drift process which provides the Lovers Point beach with sand. Lack of sand build up in the cove will shrink the beach and create a negative recreational impact for the public.

Long-Term Repair Alternative 2. Total removal of the existing pier and rip-rap revetment and construction of a new concrete gravity structure in a similar footprint supported directly upon the granite bedrock formation that makes up the sea floor. The structure would bear directly upon the seafloor and prevent the movement of water beneath it. This alternative would not disrupt the littoral drift process, however, the environmental impacts during construction such as containing concrete from the tidal zone make this alternative not preferred from a constructability standpoint.

This alternative would also generate higher wave runup and overtopping scenarios since the rip rap revetment would be removed.

Long-Term Repair Alternative 3. Removal of existing concrete pier gravity structures above 0.0 feet NAVD88 and construction of new pier atop old concrete foundation elements and rip rap.

This alternative is preferable to alternative 2 from an environmental impact and constructability standpoint, however, the design relies on older foundations and undersized rip rap for support and protection. Over the next 50 years the existing rip rap may be dislodged from the pier base leaving it vulnerable undermining as well as increased impact from wave runup and overtopping events.

Long-Term Repair Alternative 4. Complete removal of existing pier and rip rap. Construct a rip rap jetty in the same footprint with adequately sized rock to approximate elevation +20.0 feet (+/- 5 feet) NAVD88. Construct a concrete gravity structure atop the rip-rap jetty as a causeway for recreational access. This alterative is preferred from a constructability, environmental impact, and long-term protection standpoint.

To properly design and permit Long-Term Repair Alternative 4, more subsurface investigation and more detailed coastal engineering analysis is required for site specific geometry of the proposed long-term PGCC 6-7-2023

13 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 repair. Haro, Kasunich & Associates, Inc. proposes six additional continuous cores drilled through the existing pier, rip-rap, and into the underlying bedrock, three additional field surveyed cross sections, and an in-depth coastal and geotechnical engineering analysis which includes alternative analysis and wave runup and force analysis on the chosen alternative geometry. Geotechnical design parameters for temporary shoring, retaining walls, and foundation would also be provided. A cost estimate can be prepared at your request.

PGCC 6-7-2023

14 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202

APPENDIX A

ANNOTATED PHOTOGRAPHS OF CONDITIONS

FOUND ALONG THE LOVERS POINT PIER

WITH OBSERVATIONS OF PROBLEMS

AND RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS
PGCC 6-7-2023

15 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Annotated Photographs of Conditions
Found Along the Lovers Point Pier
With Observations of Problems
and Recommended Solutions
Preliminary Draft 10-29-2022
Location 1 : Lower Pier Surface
Appendix A Photo 1: Lower Pier Surface
PGCC 6-7-2023

16 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Appendix A Photo 2: Lower Pier Deck Surface
Appendix A Photo 3: Lower Pier Deck Surface
Problems:
1) Extensive cracking of concrete slab. Large cracking appears to be combination of construction joint cracking and cracking from shrinkage during curing as well as concrete erosion and spalling. 2) Spalling from corrosion of reinforcing bar at slab edges. 3) Slab appears to slope toward the upper pier and may pond water. 4) Lack of fence or guard at drop off into ocean. Safety Hazard.

Solutions:
1) Remove corroded concrete in spalled areas, replace damaged reinforcing, reform damaged area, and pour new concrete.
2) Install new 6- to 8-inch-thick reinforced concrete topping slab over entire existing lower deck.

Slope surface for positive drainage.
3) Use commercial marine grade elastomeric joint filler between new dock slab and bottom of upper pier wall.
4) Use heavy broom non-slip finish or similar on the new slab. 4) Resurface other repaired areas to match existing.
5) Install fence or guard at drop off
6) Install safety signage.

PGCC 6-7-2023

17 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 2 : Stairs from Lower Pier Deck Surface to Ocean

Appendix A Photo 4: Stairs from Lower Pier Deck Surface to Ocean

Appendix A Photo 5: Stairs from Lower Pier Surface to Ocean PGCC 6-7-2023

18 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Problems:
1) Spalling from corrosion of reinforcing bars.
2) Cracking of concrete.
3) Erosion and abrasion of stair treads. Safety Hazard. 4) Irregular stair rise and run. Safety Hazard.
5) Lack of handrail. Safety Hazard.

Solutions:
1) Remedy Safety Hazards with guards, handrail, and signage. 2) Reform and pour new concrete stairs with minimum 4-foot width, uniform rise and run of treads and aluminum or stainless-steel stair treads with nosing. 3) Remove eroded/corroded concrete, replace damaged reinforcing, reform damaged area, and pour new concrete in adjacent areas.

PGCC 6-7-2023

19 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 3 : Stairs from Upper Pier Deck Surface to Lower Pier Deck Surface Appendix A Photo 6: Stairs from Lower Pier Deck Surface to Upper Pier Deck Surface with Interior Storage Room Underneath
Appendix A Photo 7: Stairs from Lower Pier Deck Surface to Upper Pier Deck Surface with Interior Storage Room Underneath
PGCC 6-7-2023

20 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202

Appendix A Photo 8: Stairs from Lower Pier Deck Surface to Upper Pier Deck Surface with Interior Storage Room Underneath
Appendix A Photo 9: Stairs from Lower Pier Deck Surface to Upper Pier Deck Surface with Interior Storage Room Underneath
Appendix A Photo 10: Stairs from Lower Pier Deck Surface to Upper Pier Deck Surface with Interior Storage Room Underneath
PGCC 6-7-2023

21 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Problems:
1) Spalling from corrosion of reinforcing bar.
2) Cracking of concrete.
3) Structural distress from concrete reinforcing failure.

Solutions:
1) Inspect interior room.
2) Structural Engineer to evaluate stairs and stability of roof and walls of interior room. This evaluation may conclude a complete rebuild of the stairs is most cost effective or may find that resurfacing the concrete and completely filling the interior room under the stairs with concrete control density fill is adequate.
3) Remove corroded concrete, replace damaged reinforcing, sandblast surface, reform damaged area and pour new concrete.
4) Resurface repaired areas to match existing.

PGCC 6-7-2023

22 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 4 : Upper Pier Deck Surface
Appendix A Photo 11: Upper Pier Deck Surface Showing Cracking Of Slab Appendix A Photo 12: Upper Pier Deck Surface Showing Construction Joint and Cracks PGCC 6-7-2023

23 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Appendix A Photo 13: Upper Pier Surface
Problems:
1) Extensive cracking of concrete slab. Cracking appears to be combination of construction joint cracking, cracking from shrinkage during curing as well as from settlement and flexure of the massive concrete structure.
2) Spalling from corrosion of reinforcing bar at slab edges.

Solutions:
1) Remove 8-inch of cracked concrete in the seaward 75 feet of pier surface area. 2) Install new 8-inch-thick reinforced topping slab over entire existing slab. Slope surface for positive drainage.
3) Utilize heavy broom non-slip finish on new slab.
4) Use marine elastomeric filler in new control joints.

PGCC 6-7-2023

24 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 5 : Upper Pier Deck Edge Toward Lower Pier Deck Appendix A Photo 14: Upper Pier Deck Edge Toward Lower Pier Deck Appendix A Photo 15: Upper Pier Deck Edge Toward Lower Pier PGCC 6-7-2023

25 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Appendix A Photo 16: Upper Pier Deck Edge Toward Lower Pier Deck Along this edge the upper pier deck concrete slab is at the same elevation as the top of the wall that descends to the lower pier deck surface. The concrete has spalled in numerous areas, often near the location of present or former railing posts and corroded rebar is visible.

Problems:
1) Extensive cracking of concrete slab. Cracking appears to be combination of construction joint cracking, cracking from shrinkage during curing as well as from settlement and flexure of the massive concrete structure.
2) Spalling from corrosion of reinforcing bar at slab edges.

Solutions:
1) Remove corroded concrete in spalled areas, replace damaged reinforcing, reform damaged area and pour new concrete.
2) Install new 8-inch-thick reinforced topping slab over entire existing slab. Slope surface for positive drainage.
3) Use marine elastomeric filler between new lower deck concrete slab and bottom of upper pier deck wall.
4) Resurface repaired areas to match existing.
5) Install fence or guard at drop off.
6) Install safety signage.

PGCC 6-7-2023

26 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 6 : Upper Pier Deck Edge Toward Lovers Point
Along this edge there is a wall along the edge of the pier and the upper pier concrete slab is about 6 inches in elevation below the top of the wall that descends to the adjacent rip-rap. The concrete has severely cracked in numerous areas due to corrosion (chemical alteration) of the reinforcing steel that involves the iron expanding in volume as it oxidizes and causes concrete deterioration by delamination and spalling of the concrete cover and reducing the cross-sectional area of the reinforcement and reducing its bond to the concrete. Prominent cracks often parallel with the wall and near the location of present or former railing posts. Cracking is also evident that crosses the top of the wall, and corroded rebar is visible.

Appendix A Photo 17: Showing Prominent Cracks Parallel to Top of Wall Along Upper Pier Edge Toward Lovers Point
PGCC 6-7-2023

27 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Appendix A Photo 18: Showing Prominent Crack Across Top of Wall Along Upper Pier Edge Toward Lovers Point
Appendix A Photo 19:Showing Crack Location Along Old Railing Post Alignment at Upper Pier Edge Toward Lovers Point
PGCC 6-7-2023

28 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Problems:
1) Extensive cracking of top of wall at upper pier deck edge toward Lovers Point. Large cracking appears to be associated with corrosion of former railing posts, as well as from settlement and flexure of the massive concrete structure. Concrete erosion is evident. 2) Spalling from corrosion of reinforcing bar in near surface areas.

Solutions:
1) Remove upper portion of wall at upper pier deck edge toward Lovers Point and reform a new concrete beam at the edges of and the tip of the pier with a sound concrete edge beam that replaces the cracked and split concrete there, so the new concrete beam can be used as a stable foundation for new corrosion resistant railings. After demolition, form new concrete beam designed as a gravity structure with an integrated sleeved foundation for new railings, and pour new concrete.
2) Integrate work so that the adjacent new 8-inch-thick reinforced topping slab is structurally tied to the new concrete beam with reinforcing bar.
3) Use marine elastomeric filler in upper portion of new railing foundation sleeves and in any required control joints.
4) Resurface repaired areas to match existing.
5) Install fence or guard at drop off.
6) Install safety signage.

PGCC 6-7-2023

29 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 7 : Upper Pier Deck Railing
Appendix A Photo 20: Upper Pier Railing
Appendix A Photo 21: Upper Pier Deck Railing
PGCC 6-7-2023

30 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Appendix A Photo 22: Upper Pier Deck Railing
Appendix A Photo 23: Upper Pier Deck Railing Under Historical Wave Impact During Pier Construction (Photo Taken Prior to Construction of Lower Pier Deck Portion) PGCC 6-7-2023

31 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Problems:
1) Four prior generations of railing are evident. Extensive concrete cracking has resulted from expansion of railing posts because of corrosion and from wave impact forces on the railings from ocean wave overtopping of the pier.
2) Railings are essential for pier user safety, and thus must be in a challenging corrosive environment that is subject to wave inundation and impact. 3) Railing will not protect users from wave uprush, impact, or overtopping. 3) Lack of fence or guard at drop off into ocean. Safety Hazard.

Solutions:
1) Install new corrosion resistant railings. Found them in the new concrete beam located at the edges of and the tip of the pier with an integrated sleeved foundation for the new railings. 2) Use marine elastomeric filler in upper portion of new railing foundation sleeves and in any required control joints.
3) Resurface repaired areas to match existing.
4) Close pier during extreme ocean wave conditions. Install safety signage.

PGCC 6-7-2023

32 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 8 : Seaward End of Lovers Point Pier
Appendix A Photo 24: Lovers Point Pier Showing Damage at Seaward End PGCC 6-7-2023

33 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Appendix A Photo 25: Lovers Point Pier Showing Closer View of Damage at Seaward End Appendix A Photo 26: Showing 2021 Damage at Seaward End of Pier PGCC 6-7-2023

34 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Appendix A Photo 27: Showing 2021 Damage at Seaward End of Pier In January 2021, at the tip of the pier, several large pieces of concrete fascia were stripped off the structure by wave impact. The ends of two decayed wooden beams are visible where voids were created where the concrete fascia was stripped off the pier. The reinforcing ties that anchored the fascia to the concrete deeper within the pier structure are rusted away. This created a situation where the fascia was unattached or barely attached to the main bulk of the pier structure. The concrete fascia of the pier has been historically patched based on different fascia thicknesses and concrete types that are now visible.

PGCC 6-7-2023

35 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Problems:
1) Extensive cracking of concrete wall and facing. Large cracking appears to be caused by a combination of reinforcing bar and reinforcing tie failure and spalling. Under the stress of wave impact forces.
2) Exposed edges of facing and adjacent walls are delaminating and becoming detached from the core of the pier.
3) The core of the pier is exposed and subject to ongoing damage. 4) Foundation of existing fence at tip of pier is damaged, so it does not adequately guard the drop off into the ocean there. Safety Hazard.

Solutions:
1) Maintain existing additional safety fencing to prevent pedestrian access to the seaward 10 feet of the pier.
2) Close pier during extreme ocean wave conditions. Install safety signage. 3) Install new corrosion resistant railings. Found them in the new concrete beam located at the edges of and the tip of the pier with an integrated sleeved foundation for the new railings. 4) Demolish "Failing Area" of shotcrete facing shown in Photograph 26 (above). 5) Install new marine shotcrete fascia tied into core of existing pier and into new beam around upper pier perimeter. Take precautions to prevent concrete debris from any required demolition and any uncured fresh or hardened concrete from entering the ocean. 6) Resurface repaired areas to match existing adjacent surfaces.

PGCC 6-7-2023

36 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 9 : Small Building Located on Pier Approach
Appendix A Photo 28: Small Building Located on Pier Approach Appendix A Photo 29: Door into Interior of Small Building Located on Pier Approach PGCC 6-7-2023

37 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Problems:
1) Spalling from corrosion of reinforcing bar.
2) Cracking of concrete.
3) Structural distress from concrete reinforcing failure.

Solutions:
1) Inspect interior room.
2) Structural Engineer to evaluate stability of roof and walls of building. This evaluation may conclude a complete rebuild of the building is preferred or resurfacing of existing concrete and infilling of the room with concrete control density fill or may find that removal of the building is most cost effective.
3) Remove corroded concrete, replace damaged reinforcing, sandblast surface, reform damaged area and pour new concrete.
4) Resurface repaired areas to match existing.

PGCC 6-7-2023

38 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 10 : Steps to Beach from Pier Approach
At the landward end of the approach to the pier, a set of steps with arcuate treads descends to the beach sand at the main Lovers Point Beach.

Appendix A Photo 30: Steps to Beach
Problems:
1) The noses of the treads have eroded and become broken off, resulting in irregular surfaces on the steps, which are partly covered in sand. This creates a slip and fall hazard. 2) No handrail exists.

Solutions:
1) Reconstruct steps that are code compliant.
2) Install code compliant handrail(s) for pedestrians to use.

PGCC 6-7-2023

39 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Location 11 : Rip-rap Revetment
The rip-rap revetment downcoast of the pier is in good condition. It absorbs wave energy, decreases pier flooding which increases the time the pier is usable, and buttresses and supports the concrete pier structure. It is shown below.

Appendix A Photo 31: Rip-rap Revetment Downcoast of Pier PGCC 6-7-2023

40 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE  WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076  (831) 722-4175  FAX (831) 722-3202 Appendix A Photo 32: Closer View of Rip-rap Revetment Downcoast of Pier Problems:
1) The toe of the revetment is at a much steeper gradient than the remainder and quarrystone at the toe will become unstable in the future.

Solutions:
1) Ultimately the revetment may need to be armored with a layer of larger quarry stones or precast concrete elements (e. g. dolos, tetra pods, tribars etc.) PGCC 6-7-2023

APPENDIX B

WAVE RUNUP AND FORCE ANALYSIS
PGCC 6-7-2023

0.60 CONCRETE
PAD

CONCRETE
PAD

ASPHALT WALK

SAND BEACH

MEAN HIGH WATER
ELEVATION: 4.63'

ROCK/CONCRETE WALL MONTEREY BAY
40 0 30
1 10

RIPRAP/SAND

MEAN HIGH WATER
ELEVATION: 4.63'

LIGHT UTILITY

VAULT RAILING

EXISTING BUILDING WHARF HYDRANT
20 1 00
0 90
0 80
0 50

RIP RAP

RIPRAP/SAND
15 10
5 0 70
0 60
0 EXISTING CRACK IN
CONCRETE, TYPICAL 14
2 3
6 7
8 9
11 4 25
MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION: 4.63'

ROCK/CONCRETE WALL

HV TARGET

24.30 HV TARGET

14.03 25.38

25.98 25.00

25.70 26.03

26.48 27.32 EM

26.13 27.06

27.13 27.75

27.35 29.40 26.95
40-CYP
28-CYP

25.98 27.03

27.06 27.52

26.69 25.10

24.60 24.12

24.79 24.83

24.07 24.17

23.85 23.38

24.54 24.70

24.36 24.42

24.43 24.25

23.83 23.74

23.76 24.76

25.41 26.87 26.31

27.30 27.78

27.08 26.03

24.82 24.78

25.30 25.30

25.68 26.22

26.37 26.03

26.29 26.58

26.99 26.91

26.45 26.51

26.52 26.14

26.18 26.14

26.88 26.20

25.75 26.50

10.18 9.77

9.14 8.15

7.95 8.16

8.54 8.97

8.40 9.18

9.70 1.34

4.14 5.97

6.01 5.71

4.68 3.41

1.80 0.26

18.42 18.59

7.11 8.44

11.51 11.53

8.56 8.43

12.03 11.94

1.15 1.97

1.52 2.89

2.71 3.62

2.42 4.64

3.80 4.15
-0.11

1.29 3.19

0.51 1.53

1.85 2.31

2.91 3.18

4.39 5.32

11.94 12.10

7.85 0.72

0.64 1.45

1.19 -0.23

4.22 3.24

5.09 2.33

5.81 6.63

4.02 4.05

4.21 5.29

5.81 5.43

6.88 4.18

3.35 4.26

0.22 0.49 0.74

3.19 23.33 9.86 8.29

8.07 5.76 2.48

18.17 0.44

0.37 0.79

HV TARGET

21.84 HV TARGET

7.88 HV TARGET

14.10 24.74

24.62 24.42

24.28 24.48 23.23

21.08 19.10

13.92 15.35

15.33 15.25

18.54 20.61

22.34 23.53

23.90 23.92

13.81 13.87

18.09 20.26

20.80 22.03

22.18 28-PALM

23.65 24.87

23.62 20-CYP

23.72 22.45

22.32 18.47

22.96 21.48

21.12 20.63

12.81 12.60

12.86 15.91

18.27 16.28

15.61 15.41

19.28 21.22

21.54 21.52 20.20
24-CYP

23.69 23.82

24.22 20.39

20.59 22.37

22.89 23.53

21.46 19.49

20.05 19.89

23.10 23.74

23.88 24.01

24.43 14.59 8.17 4.65 1.73 0.80

18.52 15.48

16.74 5.48

4.91 3.23

13.82 1.60

14.19 14.26

14.25 FF

13.82 13.59

14.21 14.17

8.10 8.21

1.54 12.26

12.49 12.61

13.55 14.14

14.15 12.47

12.33 12.29

12.27 12.25 FF

7.99 7.97

7.97 7.87

7.15 7.93

8.07 8.15

8.19 8.21

8.26 7.22

1.56 1.52

5.54 1.62

1.45 1.97

0.38 0.88

1.20 1.29

3.26 3.15

1.04 1.82

9.45 12.54

10.57 13.27

14.31 11.73

14.91 17.40

17.94 15.53

12.94 13.94

8.23 16.51

14.34 13.93 15.30 15.24

14.22 14.82

16.57 14.02

14.38 14.41

14.23 14.22

12.10 12.38

13.61 4.12

4.09 3.66

16.22 12.26

11.07 11.60

9.42 10.05

1.78 0.81

0.66 1.65

9.91 8.19

4.70 7.35

8.78 4.71

4.97 3.99

8.18 9.75

10.81 10.06

8.54 8.63

5.66 8.63

11.01 11.83

8.13 7.81

11.86 8.88

13.82 13.57

11.03 6.12

6.27 3.85

6.97 5.32

9.70 9.96

9.80 STA 0 + 29.06 SECTION A
0 0
0 20
0 10
0 -10
0 -20
0 -30
0 -40
0 -50
0 -60
0 -70
0 -80
0 -90
0 -100
0 -110
0 -120
0 -130
0 -140
0 -150
0 -160
0 -170
0 -180
0 -190
0 -200
0 -210
0 -220
0 -230
0 -240
0 -250
0 -260
0 -270
0 -280
0 -290
0 -300
0 -310
0 -320
0 -330
0 -340
0 -350
0 -360
0 -370
30 -70 -50 -30 -10 10

ELEVATION
FEET
-370 -350 -330 -310 -290 -270 -250 -230 -210 -190 -170 -150 -130 -110 -90 -10
0 10
-20
-30 WAVE RUNUP CROSS SECTION
1 ON 9.7 FOR 101 FEET
1 ON 35.7 FOR 270.5 FEET
30 -10
0 10
20 40 60 80 100
MHTL
EXISTING RAILING 25 CROSS SECTION A

RIP RAP

EXISTING VERTICAL CONCRETE WALL EXISTING VERTICAL CONCRETE WALL APPROXIMATE WATER LINE 5-23-2022

EXISTING CONCRETE

PIER SURFACE
TOP OF WALL EL 14.5
EXISTING RAILING 1 ON 9.7 FOR 38.5 FEET
BASE OF EXPOSED WALL EL 8 RIP RAP GRANITE BEDROCK WITH SEAWEED GROWTH 1 ON 4.25 FOR 19.8 FEET 1 ON 1.4 FOR 5.6 FEET

RIP RAP
110
GRANITE BEDROCK WITH SEAWEED GROWTH GRANITE BEDROCK WITH SEAWEED GROWTH -20 -30
SWL = 11.7 NAVD88, YEAR 2072 SWL = 9.9 NAVD88, YEAR 2022 SWAN WAVES. USER SPECIFED WRUP GENERATED MAX

BREAKING WAVES
Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 1
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP & PLAN VIEW WITH WAVE RUNUP SECTION LOVERS POINT PIER BAND-AID REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 7-21-2022
OF 1 SHEETS

AS SHOWN

PRELIMINARY DRAFT
FEET
0 20 40 60 80
PGCC 6-7-2023

WAVE RUNUP AND FORCE ANALYSIS RESULTS SUMMARY

LOVERS POINT PIER
Date: October 2022
Job #: M11897
By: AK
Notes:
1) Analysis perfmored on WRUPTM wave runp software program 1984 using the composite slope method 2) All elevations reported in NAVD88
3) Analysis performed for existing and final wall configuration Description of Terms:

Case No. Case number from WRUP print outs
SWL (ft.) Still water elevation
H o' (ft.) Unrefracted deepwater wave height
T (sec.) Wave period
H b (ft.) Breaking wave height
d b (ft.) Breaking water depth
R (ft.) Wave Runup. The vertical height above the still water level to which water from an incident wave will run up the face of a structure.

TWL (ft.) Total Water Level in NAVD88 = Wave Runup (R) + Still Water Level elevation (SWL) in NAVD88 SECTION A, METHOD: CALCULATE MAXIMUM BREAKING WAVE HEIGHT GIVEN WAVE PERIOD.

Year SWL (ft.) Ho' (ft.) T (sec.) H b
(ft.) d b (ft.) R (ft.) TWL (ft. NAVD88)
2022 9.9 9.3 16 15.5 16.2 27.6 37.5
2072 11.7 10.9 16 17.3 18.2 32.8 44.5
SECTION A, METHOD: USER SPECIFIED DEEP WATER WAVE HEGIHT. WAVE HEIGHTS FROM SWAN ANALYIS.

Year SWL (ft.) Ho' (ft.) T (sec.) H b
(ft.) d b (ft.) R (ft.) TWL (ft. NAVD88)

9.9 4.8 16 11.0 7.5 14.1 24

9.9 6.2 16 13.2 9.1 19.1 29

9.9 7.0 16 14.4 9.9 22.2 32.1

11.7 4.8 16 11.0 8.3 13.5 25.2

11.7 6.2 16 13.2 9.1 20.1 31.8

11.7 7.0 16 14.4 9.9 23.2 34.9

SECTION A, SUMMARY OF WAVE FORCE ANALYSIS
Year Method SWL (ft.) Loading
Miniken SPM 9.9 992 psf
Broken Waves SPM 9.9 518 psf
Breaking Wave FEMA 9.9 961 lb/ft
Miniken SPM 11.7 1661 psf
Broken Waves SPM 11.7 582 psf
Breaking Wave FEMA 11.7 3645 lb/ft
2022
2072
2072
2022
PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

WAVE FORCE RESULTS SUMMARY

LOVERS POINT PIER
Date: October 2022
Job #: M11897
By: AK
Broken Waves - Wall Seaward of Stillwater Line
Notes:
1) Analysis is based on Chapter 7.III.4.a/b pg. 7-192 of Shore Protection Manual Volume II by Army Corps of Engineers (1984) 2) T, Hb, and db taken from WRUP
Description of Terms:

P m (psf) Maximum dynamic pressure
H b (ft.) Breaking wave height
d s (ft.) Depth at the toe of the structure
d b (ft.) Depth of breaking wave
D (ft.) Depth one wavelength in front of the wall
T (sec.) Wave period
L d (ft.) Wave length in water of depth D
R m (lb/ft) Force represented by the area under the dynamic pressure distribution M m (ft-lb / ft) Moment resulting from the dynamic component of pressure R s (lb/ft) Hydrostatic component of breaking wave on a wall M s (ft-lb / ft) Hydrostatic moment
R t (lb/ft) Total breaking wave force on wall per unit wall length M t (ft-lb / ft) Total moment about the toe
w (pcf) Unit weight of water = 64 pcf
SECTION A, SWL = 9.9
TOW (ft.) 14.5
Toe Wall (ft.) 8
SWL (ft.) 9.9
d s (ft.) 1.9
g (ft./s 2
) 32.2
T (sec.) H b (ft.) d b (ft.) h c (ft) P m (psf) R m (lb/ft) M m (ft-lb / ft) R s (lb/ft) M s (ft-lb / ft) R t (lb/ft) M t (ft-lb / ft)
16* 15.5 16.2 12.1 518.4 6,267 49,795 6,263 29,207 12,530 79,002 16** 14.4 9.9 11.2 316.8 3,558 26,744 5,518 24,156 9,077 50,900 * WRUP Calculated maximm breaking waves height given wave period. ** User specified deepwater wave height. Wave hegiht from SWAN Analysis.

SECTION A, SWL = 11.7
TOW (ft.) 14.5
Toe Wall (ft.) 8
SWL (ft.) 11.7 `
d s (ft.) 3.7
g (ft./s 2) 32.2
T (sec.) H b (ft.) d b (ft.) h c (ft) P m (psf) R m (lb/ft) M m (ft-lb / ft) R s (lb/ft) M s (ft-lb / ft) R t (lb/ft) M t (ft-lb / ft)
16* 17.3 18.2 13.5 582.4 7,859 67,956 7,583 38,912 15,442 106,868 16** 14.4 9.9 11.2 316.8 3,558 26,744 5,518 24,156 9,077 50,900 * WRUP Calculated maximm breaking waves height given wave period. ** User specified deepwater wave height. Wave hegiht from SWAN Analysis.

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

WAVE FORCE RESULTS SUMMARY

LOVERS POINT PIER
Date: October 2022
Job #: M11897
By: AK
Section A Breaking Wave Forces on Vertical Wall Notes (SWL = 11.7 ft NAVD88):

Notes:
1) Analysis is based on Miniken Method (1955, 1963). Miniken method can give wave forces that are extremeley high (15 to 18 times those calculated for non breaking waves) 2) From Chapter 7 pg. 7-99 of Shore Protection Manual Volume II by Army Corps of Engineers (1984) Description of Terms:

P m (psf) Maximum dynamic pressure
H b (ft.) Breaking wave height
d s (ft.) Depth at the toe of the structure
d b (ft.) Depth of breaking wave
D (ft.) Depth one wavelength in front of the wall
T (sec.) Wave period
L d (ft.) Wave length in water of depth D
R m (lb/ft) Force represented by the area under the dynamic pressure distribution M m (ft-lb / ft) Moment resulting from the dynamic component of pressure R s (lb/ft) Hydrostatic component of breaking wave on a wall M s
(ft-lb / ft) Hydrostatic moment
R t (lb/ft) Total breaking wave force on wall per unit wall length M t
(ft-lb / ft) Total moment about the toe
w (pcf) Unit weight of water = 64 pcf
PGCC 6-7-2023

SECTION A, SWL = 11.7, ds/D = 0.23, T = 16 sec
H b (ft.) P m (psf) R m (lb/ft) M m (ft-lb / ft) R s (lb/ft) M s (ft-lb / ft) R t (lb/ft) M t (ft-lb / ft) 2 192 128 474 707 1107 835 1581
4 384 512 1894 1040 1975 1552 3870
6 576 1152 4262 1436 3208 2588 7471
8 768 2048 7578 1897 4870 3945 12447
10 960 3200 11840 2422 7024 5622 18864
11 1056 3872 14326 2708 8306 6580 22632
12 1152 4608 17050 3011 9735 7619 26785
14 1344 6272 23206 3664 13067 9936 36274
16 1536 8192 30310 4380 17084 12572 47394

17.3 1660.8 9577 35436 4881 20092 14458 55528
18 1728 10368 38362 5161 21849 15529 60211
20 1920 12800 47360 6006 27428 18806 74788
PGCC 6-7-2023

WAVE FORCE RESULTS SUMMARY

LOVERS POINT PIER
Date: October 2022
Job #: M11897
By: AK
Section A Breaking Wave Forces on Vertical Wall Notes (SWL = 9.9 ft NAVD88):

Notes:
1) Analysis is based on Miniken Method (1955, 1963). Miniken method can give wave forces that are extremeley high (15 to 18 times those calculated for non breaki 2) From Chapter 7 pg. 7-99 of Shore Protection Manual Volume II by Army Corps of Engineers (1984) Description of Terms:

P m (psf) Maximum dynamic pressure
H b (ft.) Breaking wave height
d s (ft.) Depth at the toe of the structure
d b (ft.) Depth of breaking wave
D (ft.) Depth one wavelength in front of the wall
T (sec.) Wave period
L d (ft.) Wave length in water of depth D
R m (lb/ft) Force represented by the area under the dynamic pressure distribution M m (ft-lb / ft) Moment resulting from the dynamic component of pressure R s (lb/ft) Hydrostatic component of breaking wave on a wall M s
(ft-lb / ft) Hydrostatic moment
R t (lb/ft) Total breaking wave force on wall per unit wall length M t
(ft-lb / ft) Total moment about the toe
w (pcf) Unit weight of water = 64 pcf
PGCC 6-7-2023

SECTION A, SWL = 9.9, ds/D = 0.23, T = 16 sec
H b (ft.) P m (psf) R m (lb/ft) M m (ft-lb / ft) R s (lb/ft) M s (ft-lb / ft) R t (lb/ft) M t (ft-lb / ft) 2 128 85 162 269 260 354 422
4 256 341 649 487 633 828 1281
6 384 768 1459 768 1255 1536 2714
8 512 1365 2594 1114 2191 2479 4785
10 640 2133 4053 1524 3504 3657 7557
11 704 2581 4905 1752 4322 4334 9227
12 768 3072 5837 1997 5259 5069 11096
14 896 4181 7945 2535 7520 6716 15464

15.5 992 5125 9738 2980 9585 8105 19324
16 1024 5461 10377 3136 10350 8598 20726
18 1152 6912 13133 3802 13814 10714 26946
20 1280 8533 16213 4532 17975 13065 34188
PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

WAVE FORCE RESULTS SUMMARY FROM FEMA CCM VII

LOVERS POINT PIER
Date: October 2022
Job #: M11897
By: AK
Breaking Wave Loads on Vertical Walls FEMA Coastal Construction Manual Chapter 8.5.8.2 Note: Below calcs are based on case 1 (enclosed dry space behind wall see equation 8.6 below) SECTION A, CP = 1.6, WRUP CALCULATED MAXIMUM BREAKING WAVE GIVEN WAVE PERIOD SWL (ft.) TOW (ft.) h (ft.) d s (ft.) f brkw (lb/ft)

11.7 14.5 6.5 3.7 3645

9.9 14.5 6.5 1.9 961
SECTION A, CP = 1.6, USER SPECIFIED WAVE HEIGHT, WAVE HEIGHT FROM SWAN ANALYSIS SWL (ft.) TOW (ft.) h (ft.) d s (ft.) f brkw (lb/ft)

11.7 14.5 6.5 3.7 3645

9.9 14.5 6.5 1.9 961
PGCC 6-7-2023

APPENDIX C

RIP RAP REVETMENT EVALUATION AND BOULDER SIZING
PGCC 6-7-2023

9.1 8.1

13.3 9.9

24.7 19.6

7.7 20.4

20.8 10.4 8.4 9.7 10.1 7.9

10.3 12.7 14.7

19.8 13.2 4.7

12.6 6.0

10.7 12.6

9.7 8.8

16.5 13.2

24.7 14.3

8.8 10.6 9.5

11.2 10.3

8.9 14.8

10.5 14.5

9.5 10.5

8.2 15.2

11.1 17.2

8.0 17.2

17.3 8.6

7.1 17.3

32.7 13.9 31.8

7.2 10.1

7.7 8.3 6.5

11.2 10.0 6.4

16.3 15.7

18.0 13.7

24.7 15.5

24.0 10.7

15.3 16.4

11.8 9.4

18.0 12.9 10.1

8.6 14.3

14.2 12.3

8.1 10.7

20.5 27.0

19.9 15.5

10.0 13.0

24.8 15.9

11.6 10.8

7.9 27.6

15.0 12.1

15.5 10.2 15.9 11.5

12.3 17.7

6.3 9.0

13.5 15.2

10.5 13.5 14.8

10.6 16.6 14.2

11.2 25.3

12.3 10.8

9.2 9.7 7.4

16.1 8.6

10.1 1 2 4 3 5 6
15 14 7 8 9
10 11
13 12
16 17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42 44 45
46 43
47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54
60 55 56
57 65
66 63
67 68
58 59
69 71
70 72
73 74
76 75
82 83 84
85 77
78 79
80 81
87 89
86 88 90
91 92
94 96 98
93 95 97
99 100
101
102
103
104
105
106
111
107
108
109
110
112 113
114
117
117
118
119
115 116
120
121
122
64 61
62 9.4
Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 HKA CALC SHEET - NOT PART OF PLAN SET LOVERS POINT PIER BAND-AID REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 10-20-2022

AS SHOWN

HKA CALC SHEET - NOT PART OF PLAN SET

AREAS IN SQ FT
1 inch = 5 ft.

FEET 0 5 10 15 D:\FOXX\Lovers Point Pier\2022-10-20 LOVERS POINT PIER REPAIR.dwg, 10/20/2022 4:18:04 PM PGCC 6-7-2023

Lovers Point Rip Rap sample October 20, 2022
122 Boulders Measured Adjacent to
Boulder # Top View Area Ft2
Top View Radius2 Ft2
Top View Radius Ft *Volume Ft3Tons
68 32.7 10.4 3.2 105.5 8.7
67 31.8 10.1 3.2 101.2 8.3
38 27.6 8.8 3.0 81.8 6.7
118 27.0 8.6 2.9 79.2 6.5
91 25.3 8.1 2.8 71.8 5.9
59 24.8 7.9 2.8 69.7 5.7
16 24.7 7.9 2.8 69.3 5.7
104 24.7 7.9 2.8 69.3 5.7
99 24.0 7.6 2.8 66.3 5.5
9 20.8 6.6 2.6 53.5 4.4
1 20.4 6.5 2.5 52.0 4.3
120 19.9 6.3 2.5 50.1 4.1
28 19.8 6.3 2.5 49.7 4.1
6 19.6 6.2 2.5 49.0 4.0
97 18.0 5.7 2.4 43.1 3.6
117 18.0 5.7 2.4 43.1 3.6
76 17.7 5.6 2.4 42.0 3.5
57 17.3 5.5 2.3 40.6 3.3
58 17.3 5.5 2.3 40.6 3.3
27 17.2 5.5 2.3 40.2 3.3
30 17.2 5.5 2.3 40.2 3.3
96 16.6 5.3 2.3 38.2 3.1
18 16.5 5.3 2.3 37.8 3.1
102 16.4 5.2 2.3 37.5 3.1
93 16.3 5.2 2.3 37.1 3.1
69 16.1 5.1 2.3 36.4 3.0
33 15.9 5.1 2.2 35.8 3.0
80 15.9 5.1 2.2 35.8 3.0
95 15.7 5.0 2.2 35.1 2.9
81 15.5 4.9 2.2 34.4 2.8
105 15.5 4.9 2.2 34.4 2.8
121 15.5 4.9 2.2 34.4 2.8
101 15.3 4.9 2.2 33.8 2.8
54 15.2 4.8 2.2 33.4 2.8
72 15.2 4.8 2.2 33.4 2.8
39 15.0 4.8 2.2 32.8 2.7
48 14.8 4.7 2.2 32.1 2.7
85 14.8 4.7 2.2 32.1 2.7
32 14.7 4.7 2.2 31.8 2.6
53 14.5 4.6 2.1 31.2 2.6
41 14.3 4.6 2.1 30.5 2.5
113 14.3 4.6 2.1 30.5 2.5
PGCC 6-7-2023

98 14.2 4.5 2.1 30.2 2.5
109 14.2 4.5 2.1 30.2 2.5
61 13.9 4.4 2.1 29.2 2.4
103 13.7 4.4 2.1 28.6 2.4
70 13.5 4.3 2.1 28.0 2.3
75 13.5 4.3 2.1 28.0 2.3 3 13.3 4.2 2.1 27.4 2.3
17 13.2 4.2 2.0 27.1 2.2
26 13.2 4.2 2.0 27.1 2.2
122 13.0 4.1 2.0 26.4 2.2
115 12.9 4.1 2.0 26.1 2.2
31 12.7 4.0 2.0 25.5 2.1
21 12.6 4.0 2.0 25.2 2.1
24 12.6 4.0 2.0 25.2 2.1
77 12.3 3.9 2.0 24.3 2.0
90 12.3 3.9 2.0 24.3 2.0
108 12.3 3.9 2.0 24.3 2.0
40 12.1 3.9 2.0 23.7 2.0
106 11.8 3.8 1.9 22.9 1.9
35 11.6 3.7 1.9 22.3 1.8
78 11.5 3.7 1.9 22.0 1.8
46 11.2 3.6 1.9 21.1 1.7
82 11.2 3.6 1.9 21.1 1.7
92 11.2 3.6 1.9 21.1 1.7
60 11.1 3.5 1.9 20.9 1.7
34 10.8 3.4 1.9 20.0 1.7
89 10.8 3.4 1.9 20.0 1.7
22 10.7 3.4 1.8 19.7 1.6
100 10.7 3.4 1.8 19.7 1.6
112 10.7 3.4 1.8 19.7 1.6
44 10.6 3.4 1.8 19.5 1.6
94 10.6 3.4 1.8 19.5 1.6
50 10.5 3.3 1.8 19.2 1.6
52 10.5 3.3 1.8 19.2 1.6
74 10.5 3.3 1.8 19.2 1.6
15 10.4 3.3 1.8 18.9 1.6
11 10.3 3.3 1.8 18.7 1.5
43 10.3 3.3 1.8 18.7 1.5
79 10.2 3.2 1.8 18.4 1.5
12 10.1 3.2 1.8 18.1 1.5
63 10.1 3.2 1.8 18.1 1.5
110 10.1 3.2 1.8 18.1 1.5
116 10.1 3.2 1.8 18.1 1.5
83 10.0 3.2 1.8 17.8 1.5
119 10.0 3.2 1.8 17.8 1.5 5 9.9 3.2 1.8 17.6 1.4
13 9.7 3.1 1.8 17.0 1.4
PGCC 6-7-2023

20 9.7 3.1 1.8 17.0 1.4
86 9.7 3.1 1.8 17.0 1.4
45 9.5 3.0 1.7 16.5 1.4
49 9.5 3.0 1.7 16.5 1.4
7 9.4 3.0 1.7 16.3 1.3
111 9.4 3.0 1.7 16.3 1.3
87 9.2 2.9 1.7 15.7 1.3
2 9.1 2.9 1.7 15.5 1.3
71 9.0 2.9 1.7 15.2 1.3
47 8.9 2.8 1.7 15.0 1.2
19 8.8 2.8 1.7 14.7 1.2
42 8.8 2.8 1.7 14.7 1.2
37 8.6 2.7 1.7 14.2 1.2
55 8.6 2.7 1.7 14.2 1.2
114 8.6 2.7 1.7 14.2 1.2
14 8.4 2.7 1.6 13.7 1.1
64 8.3 2.6 1.6 13.5 1.1
51 8.2 2.6 1.6 13.2 1.1
4 8.1 2.6 1.6 13.0 1.1
107 8.1 2.6 1.6 13.0 1.1
29 8.0 2.5 1.6 12.8 1.1
10 7.9 2.5 1.6 12.5 1.0
36 7.9 2.5 1.6 12.5 1.0
8 7.7 2.5 1.6 12.1 1.0
66 7.7 2.5 1.6 12.1 1.0
88 7.4 2.4 1.5 11.4 0.9
62 7.2 2.3 1.5 10.9 0.9
56 7.1 2.3 1.5 10.7 0.9
65 6.5 2.1 1.4 9.3 0.8
84 6.4 2.0 1.4 9.1 0.8
73 6.3 2.0 1.4 8.9 0.7
23 6.0 1.9 1.4 8.3 0.7
25 4.7 1.5 1.2 5.7 0.5
ASSUMPTION (field check suggests this is reasonable)
* Volume (ft3)= plan view surface area of boulder (ft2)times radius (ft) boulders are typically placed lying flat; thinnest dimension is vertical PGCC 6-7-2023

CATEGORIES
Weight Class # of Boulders in SampleWeight of Class % By Weight of Total Sample 8+ Tons 2 17 6%
5 to 7 Tons 7 42 14%
4 to 5 Tons 5 21 7%
3 to 4 Tons 14 46 16%
2 to 3 Tons 32 80 27%
1 to 2 Tons 54 81 28%

0.5 to 1 Ton 8 6 2%
Total 122 293
By Weight the Mean Boulder Size is about 2.75 Tons
By Number of Boulders Mean Boulder Size is about 2 Tons Note than many boulders less than 0.5 Tons were NOT included in sample PGCC 6-7-2023

Rip-Rap Sizing and Stability
Lovers Point Pier Repair
Date: Oct 2022
Job #: M11897
By: AK
Stability of Rubble Structures
Notes:
1) Analysis is based on Chapter 7.III.7 pg. 7-202 of Shore Protection Manual Volume II by Army Corps of Engineers (1984) 2) H taken from WRUP
Description of Terms:

W (lb) Weight in pounds of an individual armor unit in the primary cover w r (pcf) Unite weight of armor units (limestone & granite =~165pcf) H (ft.) Design wave height (from WRUP analysis)
S r Specific weight of armor unit, relative to the water at the site (wr / ww) w w (pcf) Unit weight of water (seawater = 64 pcf)
θ ( ˚) Angle of structure slope measured from horizontal in degrees K D Stability coefficient (table 7-8)
SECTION A, Scour Profile
w r (pcf) 165.0
S r 2.6
w w (pcf) 64.0
θ ( ˚) 6.0 ~10H:1V
K D 2.0
Section A, Method: Calculate Maximum Breaking Wave Height Given Wave Period Reduced wave height to account for waves braking outside and rolling in as whitewater Year SWL (ft) H (ft.) W (lb) W (ton) Year SWL (ft) H (ft.) W (lb) W (ton) 2022 9.9 15.5 8,216 4.1 2022 9.9 8.463 1,337 0.7
2072 11.7 17.3 11,423 5.7 2072 11.7 9.4458 1,859 0.9
Section A, Method: User Specifeid Deep Water Wave Height: Wave Heights From Swan Analysis Year SWL (ft) H (ft.) W (lb) W (ton)
2022 9.9 14.4 6,588 3.3
2072 11.7 14.4 6,588 3.3
PGCC 6-7-2023

APPENDIX D

COASTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FIELD EXPLORATION

FOR UPPER AND LOWER DECK
PGCC 6-7-2023

DRILLED HOLE 1 (DH-1) “UPPER DECK” 4-5-2022
PGCC 6-7-2023

DRILLED HOLE 2 “UPPER DECK” (DH-2) 4-5-2022
PGCC 6-7-2023

DRILLED HOLE 2 “UPPER DECK” (DH-2) 4-5-2022
PGCC 6-7-2023

COMPARING FINDINGS WITH OBSERVATIONS OF EXTERIOR
PGCC 6-7-2023

DRILLED HOLE 3 (DH-3) “LOWER DECK” 4-6-2022
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE HOLE (CH-2) UPPER DECK 4-7-2022
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE HOLE 3 (CH-3) LOWER DECK
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-2-3 UPPER DECK DEPTH = 40 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-2-4 UPPER DECK DEPTH = 67.5 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-2-5 UPPER DECK DEPTH = 40 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-2-6 UPPER DECK DEPTH = 75 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-2-7 UPPER DECK DEPTH 89 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-3-2 LOWER DECK DEPTH = 22 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-3-3 LOWER DECK DEPTH = 38 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-3-4 LOWER DECK DEPTH = 45 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-3-5 LOWER DECK DEPTH = 52 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-3-7 LOWER DECK DEPTH = 59 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

CORE C-3-8 LOWER DECK DEPTH = 83 INCHES
PGCC 6-7-2023

Clients Project No:

Design Strength (psi):

1.44 1.63

2.87 3110
2 Average Compressive Strength (psi): 3110
Cross-Sectional Area (in2):

Length (in):

Total Load (lbs.):

Compressive Strength (psi):

Type of Break (C39 - Fig. 2):

Date Tested:

Time Tested:

Age at Test (days):

Ave. Diameter (in.):
5,070
10:01 AM
5 Sulfur Caps - C617
Test Date : 4/11/2022
Cored By:

Sample C-21: Diameter is 1.44", Uncut length is 4.01", no cutes grooves or voids in core.

N/A
4/12/2022
Cored Date: Notes:

Sampling Method Used:

Sample No:

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Lovers Point Pier
Project No: 16129.26
Project:

ASTM C39
Sample Set No: C-21 Sample Type: 1" cylinder
HKA
Cylinder Capping Method Used:
4/7/2022
Date:

Client:

ASTM C42
HKA
Sample Location/Notes Lovers Point Pier - C21
April 11, 2022
11897.1 Material Type:

Chris Johnson - Supervising Engineer
Pacific Crest Engineering.

Tested By - Brian Apolinario Date Issued
Results relate only to the items inspected or tested. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the proper written approval of The above samples and tests performed are in compliance with the approved project plans and specifications.

Worksheet: W22 Page 1 of 1 Rev. 1120
4/12/22
PGCC 6-7-2023

Clients Project No:

Design Strength (psi):

ASTM C42
Chris Johnson - Supervising Engineer
Pacific Crest Engineering.

Tested By - Brian Apolinario Date Issued
Results relate only to the items inspected or tested. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the proper written approval of The above samples and tests performed are in compliance with the approved project plans and specifications.

HKA
Sample Location/Notes Lovers Point Pier - C21
Sample No: 1
Cylinder Capping Method Used:
4/7/2022
Sampling Method Used:

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Lovers Point Pier
Project No: 16129.26
Project:

ASTM C39
Date: April 11, 2022
Client:

Sample Set No: C-22 Sample Type: 1" cylinder
HKA
11897.1 Material Type: Masonry
Time Tested: 10:01 AM
5 Sulfur Caps - C617
Test Date : 4/12/2022
Cored By:

Sample C-22: Diameter is 1.45", Uncut Length is 6.34",sample has some large aggregate within it. No voids.

N/A
4/12/2022
Cored Date: Notes:

Date Tested:

Age at Test (days):

Ave. Diameter (in.):
7370
2 Average Compressive Strength (psi): 7370
Cross-Sectional Area (in2):

Length (in):

Total Load (lbs.):

Compressive Strength (psi):

Type of Break (C39 - Fig. 2):
12,170

1.45 1.65

2.82 Worksheet: W22 Page 1 of 1 Rev. 1120
4/14/22
PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

Clients Project No:

Design Strength (psi):

ASTM C42
Chris Johnson - Supervising Engineer
Pacific Crest Engineering.

Tested By - Brian Apolinario Date Issued
Results relate only to the items inspected or tested. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the proper written approval of The above samples and tests performed are in compliance with the approved project plans and specifications.

HKA
Sample Location/Notes Lovers Point Pier - C21
Sample No: 1
Cylinder Capping Method Used:
4/7/2022
Sampling Method Used:

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Lovers Point Pier
Project No: 16129.26
Project:

ASTM C39
Date: April 11, 2022
Client:

Sample Set No: C-31 Sample Type: 1" cylinder
HKA
11897.1 Material Type: Masonry
Time Tested: 10:01 AM
5 Sulfur Caps - C617
Test Date : 4/13/2022
Cored By:

Sample C-31: Diameter 1.37", Uncut Length 9.54", 3/8" - 1/2" Agg. Present. Sample to be cut 2.74" from top
N/A
4/13/2022
Cored Date: Notes:

Date Tested:

Age at Test (days):

Ave. Diameter (in.):
3190
3 Average Compressive Strength (psi): 3190
Cross-Sectional Area (in2):

Length (in):

Total Load (lbs.):

Compressive Strength (psi):

Type of Break (C39 - Fig. 2):
4,700

1.37 1.47

2.82 Worksheet: W22 Page 1 of 1 Rev. 1120
4/14/22
PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

Clients Project No:

Design Strength (psi):

ASTM C42
Chris Johnson - Supervising Engineer
Pacific Crest Engineering.

Tested By - Brian Apolinario Date Issued
Results relate only to the items inspected or tested. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the proper written approval of The above samples and tests performed are in compliance with the approved project plans and specifications.

HKA
Sample Location/Notes Lovers Point Pier - C21
Sample No: 1
Cylinder Capping Method Used:
4/7/2022
Sampling Method Used:

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Lovers Point Pier
Project No: 16129.26
Project:

ASTM C39
Date: April 11, 2022
Client:

Sample Set No: C-36 Sample Type: 1" cylinder
HKA
11897.1 Material Type: Masonry
Time Tested: 10:01 AM
5 Sulfur Caps - C617
Test Date : 4/13/2022
Cored By:

Sample C-36: Diameter 1.44", Uncut Length 7.31", Various 3/8" - 3/4" Agg. Present. Some Voids.

N/A
4/13/2022
Cored Date: Notes:

Date Tested:

Age at Test (days):

Ave. Diameter (in.):
4370
3 Average Compressive Strength (psi): 4370
Cross-Sectional Area (in2):

Length (in):

Total Load (lbs.):

Compressive Strength (psi):

Type of Break (C39 - Fig. 2):
7,120

1.44 1.63

2.83 Worksheet: W22 Page 1 of 1 Rev. 1120
4/14/22
PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

HARO, KASUNICH & ASSOCIATES, INC.

GEOTECHNICAL AND COASTAL ENGINEERS
116 E. LAKE AVENUE, WATSONVILLE, CA 95076
(831) 722-4175
SCALE:

DATE:

DRAWN BY:

REVISED: JOB NO. SHEET NO.

OCT 2022
M11897
Pacific Grove
Monterey County
Lovers Point Pier
SCALE: DRAWN BY: AK
FIGURE NO. D-1

DRILLING SITE PLAN
NTS
NOTES:

1. BASE MAP FROM GOOGLE EARTH 2020
KEY: = CORING LOCATION
C-#
C-2 C-3
= DRILLING LOCATION
D-#
D-1
D-2
D-3
PGCC 6-7-2023

PRIMARY DIVISIONS SECONDARY DIVISIONS GWGP GMGCSWSPSMSCML CL OL MHCHOHPt GROUP SYMBOL GRAVEL SAND SILTS AND CLAYES SILTS AND CLAYES HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILSCLEAN GRAVELS (LESS THAN 5% FINES) GRAVEL WITH FINES CLEAN SANDS (LESS THAN 5% FINES) SANDS WITH FINES MORE THAN HALF OF COARSE FRACTION IS LARGER THAN NO. 4 SIEVE MORE THAN HALF OF COARSE FRACTION IS SMALLER THAN NO. 4 SIEVE WELL GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES. POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTURES, NON-PLASTIC FINES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES, PLASTIC FINES. WELL GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES. POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES. SILTY SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTYRES, NON-PLASTIC FINES. CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTYRES, PLASTIC FINES. INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY. SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS. ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY. INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS. INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS. ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS. PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS. FINES. LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50% LIQUID LIMIT GREATER THAN 50%

MORE THAN HALF OF MATERIAL IS
LARGER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE

COARSE GRADED SOILS FINE GRADED SOILS

MORE THAN HALF OF

MATERIAL IS SMALLER THAN
NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE U.S. STANDARD SERIES SIEVE GRAIN SIZES CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENINGS 200 40 10 4 3/4" 2" 12" SAND GRAVEL SILTS AND CLAYS FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES BOULDERS RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY SAMPLING METHOD WATER SANDS AND GRAVELS BLOWS PER FOOT* SILTS AND CLAYS STRENGTH (TSF)** BLOWS PER FOOT* STANDARD PENETRATION TEST MODIFIED CALIFORNIA PITCHER BARREL SHELBY TUBE BULK VERY LOOSE LOOSE MEDIUM DENSE DENSE VERY DENSE 0 - 4 4 - 10 10 - 30 30 - 50 OVER 50 VERY SOFT SOFT FIRM STIFF VERY STIFF HARD 0 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 4 OVER 4 0 - 2 2 - 4 4 - 8 8 - 16 16 - 32 OVER 32 BSPMCT FINAL INITIAL WATER LEVEL DESIGNATION FIGURE NO. D-2KEY TO LOGS NTS HARO, KASUNICH & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL AND COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 E. LAKE AVENUE, WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY: REVISED: JOB NO. SHEET NO. OCT 2022 M11897 Pacific Grove Monterey County Lovers Point Pier SCALE: DRAWN BY: AK PGCC 6-7-2023

Concrete 1/4" to 1/2" angular gravels, good
matrix with hard cementitious material,
solid concrete
Same as above but weaker
Concrete with granite gabion or riprap, poor
matrix, weak or punky cementitious material
Hard granite riprap or bedrock
Bottom of borehole at 7.5 feet.

C-2-1
C-2-2
C-2-3
C-2-4
C-2-5
C-2-6
C-2-7
NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 14 ft

LOGGED BY TA
DRILLING METHOD Coring
HOLE SIZE 2"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR HKA GROUND WATER LEVELS:

CHECKED BY MC
DATE STARTED 4/7/22 COMPLETED 4/7/22
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- AT END OF DRILLING --- AFTER DRILLING --- DEPTH (ft)

0.0 2.5

5.0 7.5 GRAPHIC LOG

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER PLASTIC LIMIT LIQUID SAND LIMIT % GRAVEL % DRY UNIT WT. (pcf) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) COHESION (psf)

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
SIEVE
ANALYSIS Phi USCS (deg) PLASTICITY FINES INDEX
%
CORING NUMBER C-2
Figure No.: 3
PROJECT NAME Lovers Point Pier Interim Repair
PROJECT LOCATION Pacific Grove, California
CLIENT City of Pacific Grove
PROJECT NUMBER M11897
GEOTECH BH COLUMNS - GINT STD US.GDT - 10/28/22 16:30 - H:\PROJECTS\11000S\11897 FOLDER, LOVERS POINT PIER FAILURE, CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT\APPENDIX\11897 BLOGS FINAL 10-28-22, FIG 3 - 7.GPJ Haro, Kasunich and Associates, Inc.

COMPRESSIVE

STRENGTH
(psi)
3,110
7,370
PGCC 6-7-2023

Concrete, 1/4" to 1/2" angular gravel fair, matrix,
some voids, fair to poor cementitious material,
"solid concrete"
Same as above but weaker
(GP) Granite riprap or gabion size rock
Concrete, 1/4" to 3/4" angular gravel, fair matrix,
fair cementitious material
Concrete bonded to gabion or riprap size
granite, good concrete matrix, 1/4" to 3/4"
gravel, hard cementitious material
Concrete, 1/4" to 3/4" angular gravel, fair matrix,
some voids, fair cementitious material
Cement bonded to granite gabion or riprap, fair
matrix, fair cementitious material
Native granite bedrock formation
Bottom of borehole at 7.5 feet.

C-3-1
C-3-2
C-3-3
C-3-4
C-3-5
C-3-6
C-3-7
C-3-8
GP
NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 8 ft

LOGGED BY TA
DRILLING METHOD Coring
HOLE SIZE 2"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR HKA GROUND WATER LEVELS:

CHECKED BY MC
DATE STARTED 4/7/22 COMPLETED 4/7/22
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- AT END OF DRILLING --- AFTER DRILLING --- DEPTH (ft)

0.0 2.5

5.0 7.5 GRAPHIC LOG

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER PLASTIC LIMIT LIQUID SAND LIMIT % GRAVEL % DRY UNIT WT. (pcf) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) COHESION (psf)

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
SIEVE
ANALYSIS Phi USCS (deg) PLASTICITY FINES INDEX
%
CORING NUMBER C-3
Figure No.: 4
PROJECT NAME Lovers Point Pier Interim Repair
PROJECT LOCATION Pacific Grove, California
CLIENT City of Pacific Grove
PROJECT NUMBER M11897
GEOTECH BH COLUMNS - GINT STD US.GDT - 10/28/22 16:30 - H:\PROJECTS\11000S\11897 FOLDER, LOVERS POINT PIER FAILURE, CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT\APPENDIX\11897 BLOGS FINAL 10-28-22, FIG 3 - 7.GPJ Haro, Kasunich and Associates, Inc.

COMPRESSIVE

STRENGTH
(psi)
3,190
4,370
PGCC 6-7-2023

Grey, cement, sand, gravel, fine to coarse grain,
quartz "concrete"
(SW) White sand, fine to coarse grain, quartz,
granite pieces, "granite and concrete," easier
drilling
Concrete and grainte rubble, harder drilling
Hard granite riprap or bedrock
Bottom of borehole at 9.5 feet.

SW
NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 14 ft

LOGGED BY TA
DRILLING METHOD Percussion Drilling
HOLE SIZE 2"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Sunstone Construction GROUND WATER LEVELS:

CHECKED BY MC
DATE STARTED 4/5/22 COMPLETED 4/5/22
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- AT END OF DRILLING --- AFTER DRILLING --- DEPTH (ft)

0.0 2.5

5.0 7.5 GRAPHIC LOG

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER PLASTIC LIMIT LIQUID SAND LIMIT % GRAVEL % DRY UNIT WT. (pcf) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) COHESION (psf)

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
SIEVE
ANALYSIS Phi USCS (deg) PLASTICITY FINES INDEX
%
BORING NUMBER DH-1
Figure No.: 5
PROJECT NAME Lovers Point Pier Interim Repair
PROJECT LOCATION Pacific Grove, California
CLIENT City of Pacific Grove
PROJECT NUMBER M11897
GEOTECH BH COLUMNS - GINT STD US.GDT - 10/28/22 16:30 - H:\PROJECTS\11000S\11897 FOLDER, LOVERS POINT PIER FAILURE, CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT\APPENDIX\11897 BLOGS FINAL 10-28-22, FIG 3 - 7.GPJ Haro, Kasunich and Associates, Inc.

COMPRESSIVE

STRENGTH
(psi)
PGCC 6-7-2023

Grey sand, gravel, cement, quartz " concrete"
White and grey sand, fine to coarse grain,
quartz and gravel, concrete and granite riprap or
gabion rock, easier drilling
Grey white sand, quartz, fine to coarse grain,
"concrete and riprap or gabion rock," harder
drilling
Grey coarse sand, quartz, feldspar, mica, native
granite bedrock or riprap
Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet.

NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 14 ft

LOGGED BY TA
DRILLING METHOD Percussion Drilling
HOLE SIZE 2"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Sunstone Construction GROUND WATER LEVELS:

CHECKED BY MC
DATE STARTED 4/5/22 COMPLETED 4/5/22
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- AT END OF DRILLING --- AFTER DRILLING --- DEPTH (ft)

0.0 2.5

5.0 7.5

10.0 GRAPHIC LOG

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER PLASTIC LIMIT LIQUID SAND LIMIT % GRAVEL % DRY UNIT WT. (pcf) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) COHESION (psf)

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
SIEVE
ANALYSIS Phi USCS (deg) PLASTICITY FINES INDEX
%
BORING NUMBER DH-2
Figure No.: 6
PROJECT NAME Lovers Point Pier Interim Repair
PROJECT LOCATION Pacific Grove, California
CLIENT City of Pacific Grove
PROJECT NUMBER M11897
GEOTECH BH COLUMNS - GINT STD US.GDT - 10/28/22 16:30 - H:\PROJECTS\11000S\11897 FOLDER, LOVERS POINT PIER FAILURE, CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT\APPENDIX\11897 BLOGS FINAL 10-28-22, FIG 3 - 7.GPJ Haro, Kasunich and Associates, Inc.

COMPRESSIVE

STRENGTH
(psi)
PGCC 6-7-2023

Grey sand, cement and gravel, fine to coarse
grain "concrete"
Grey white sand, gravel, quartz cement, fine to
coarse grain, concrete and granite riprap or
gabion rock, easier drilling
Grey white sand, gravel, quartz cement, fine to
coarse grain, concrete and granite riprap or
gabion rock, harder drilling
Grey and white and black, sand fine to coarse
grain, quartz, mica, feldspar, native granite
bedrock
Bottom of borehole at 9.0 feet.

NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 8 ft

LOGGED BY TA
DRILLING METHOD Percussion Drilling
HOLE SIZE 2"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Sunstone Construction GROUND WATER LEVELS:

CHECKED BY MC
DATE STARTED 4/6/22 COMPLETED 4/6/22
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- AT END OF DRILLING --- AFTER DRILLING --- DEPTH (ft)

0.0 2.5

5.0 7.5 GRAPHIC LOG

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER PLASTIC LIMIT LIQUID SAND LIMIT % GRAVEL % DRY UNIT WT. (pcf) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) COHESION (psf)

ATTERBERG
LIMITS
SIEVE
ANALYSIS Phi USCS (deg) PLASTICITY FINES INDEX
%
BORING NUMBER DH-3
Figure No.: 7
PROJECT NAME Lovers Point Pier Interim Repair
PROJECT LOCATION Pacific Grove, California
CLIENT City of Pacific Grove
PROJECT NUMBER M11897
GEOTECH BH COLUMNS - GINT STD US.GDT - 10/28/22 16:30 - H:\PROJECTS\11000S\11897 FOLDER, LOVERS POINT PIER FAILURE, CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT\APPENDIX\11897 BLOGS FINAL 10-28-22, FIG 3 - 7.GPJ Haro, Kasunich and Associates, Inc.

COMPRESSIVE

STRENGTH
(psi)
PGCC 6-7-2023

SHEET INDEX

LOVERS POINT PIER BAND-AID REPAIR

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK
APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 A.P.N. : 006-155-099 3.06 Acres

PROJECT
SITE:

SITE
Moses Cuprill, C.E. 78904
HARO, KASUNICH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
116 East Lake
Watsonville, CA 95076
(831)722-4175

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
Public Works Department
Attn: Daniel Gho, Public Works Director/
Deputy City Manager
2100 Sunset Drive
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
(831) 648-5722
Plan Preparers:

Prepared for:

OWNER: CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

LOVERS POINT PARK
OCEAN VIEW BLVD.,
PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950

VICINITY MAP

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP

NO SCALE
OBLIQUE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM 2021
OBLIQUE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM 2021 SHOWING PIER DAMAGE NO SCALE

NO SCALE

PROJECT DATA
SHEET 1 - TITLE SHEET
SHEET 2 - OBLIQUE AERIAL PHOTOS
SHEET 3 - STAGING AND ACCESS PLAN
SHEET 4 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
SHEET 5 - REPAIR SITE PLAN AND SECTIONS
SHEET 6 - EXISTING CROSS SECTIONS A & B
SHEET 7 - EXISTING CROSS SECTIONS C & D
SHEET 8 - FASCIA PATCH AND SLAB DETAILS
SHEET 9 - FOOTING AND SLAB DETAILS
SHEET 10 - GUARD AND HANDRAIL DETAILS
SHEET 11 - STRUCTURAL NOTES
SHEET 12 - GENERAL NOTES
SHEET 13 - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
& BEST MANAGEMENT PLAN PROVISIONS
SHEET 14 - SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES
SITE
Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 1
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

AS SHOWN
11897 TITLE SHEET LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 2
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 OBLIQUE AERIAL PHOTOS 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

AS SHOWN
OBLIQUE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS FROM MAY 23, 2022 SHOWING AREA NEEDING REPAIR

NO SCALE
11897 LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

ACCESS
ROUTE

WORKING
AREA

CONSTRUCTION

STAGING AREA
Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MW
Sheet 3
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 STAGING AND ACCESS PLAN 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS
NTS
11897

CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTE AND STAGING AREA
GOOGLE IMAGE DATE 2/23/2021
NTS LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

LT WALK

SAND BEACH

MEAN HIGH WATER
ELEVATION: 4.63'
(E) ROCK/CONCRETE WALL

MONTEREY BAY
(E) RIPRAP/SAND MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION: 4.63'
LIGHT

UTILITY
VAULT
(E) BUILDING
(E) RIP RAP

RIPRAP/SAND
(E) CRACK IN

CONCRETE,

TYPICAL
MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION: 4.63'
(E) ROCK/CONCRETE WALL
(E) CONTROL JOINT
(E) JOINT (E) JOINT (E) JOINT (E) JOINT
(E) WHARF

HYDRANT
(E) RAILING
(E) RAILING
Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 4
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 EXISTING CONDITIONS 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

AS SHOWN
FEET 0 10 20 30 40
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 FOOT

ELEVATIONS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON A RTK GPS TIE TO NGS BENCHMARK PID:GU-3229 (DESIGNATION 941 3450 TIDAL 3).

ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE IN THE NORTH AMERICAN
VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88).

BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON REALTIME KINEMATIC (RTK) GPS READINGS ON TWO CONTROL POINTS SET ONSITE FOR THIS PROJECT.

BACKGROUND IMAGERY IS AN ORTHORECTIFIED PHOTO MOSAIC.

PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND GROUND SURVEY PERFORMED ON MAY 23, 2022.

SURVEY CREATED BY ALPHA LAND SURVEYS, INC. ON JUNE 13 2022. 11897 LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

LT WALK

SAND BEACH

MEAN HIGH WATER
ELEVATION: 4.63'
(E) ROCK/CONCRETE WALL

MONTEREY BAY
(E) RIPRAP/SAND

MEAN HIGH WATER
ELEVATION: 4.63'
LIGHT

UTILITY
VAULT
(E) BUILDING
(E) RIP RAP

RIPRAP/SAND
0 20
0 10
0 40
0 30
0 70
0 60
0 50
0 1 00
0 90
0 80
1 0 0
10 0 20
0 10
0 40
0 30
0 70
0 60
0 50
0 1 00
0 90
0 80
1 0 0
10 (E) CRACK IN

CONCRETE,

TYPICAL
MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION: 4.63'
(E) ROCK/CONCRETE WALL
(E) CONTROL JOINT

LIMIT OF

NEW SLAB
(E) JOINT (E) JOINT
(E) JOINT
(E) JOINT
INSTALL NEW 10"

REINFORCED

SHOTCRETE FASCIA

ON WALL FACE
INSTALL NEW 6"

REINFORCED

SHOTCRETE FASCIA

ON WALL FACE
(E) WHARF

HYDRANT

REFORM AND RESURFACE

EXISTING STAIRS TO BE
CODE COMPLIANT. INSTALL

STAINLESS STEEL HANDRAIL
AND GUARD.
(E) RAILING
(E) RAILING

INSTALL
NEW 6"

REINFORCED

SHOTCRETE

FASCIA ON

WALL FACE

INFILL DOORWAY IN

STAIRWELL WALL &

REPAIR & RESURFACE

WALLS TO MATCH

ADJACENT EXISTING
WALLS
3'
3'
INSTALL NEW 6"

REINFORCED

SHOTCRETE FASCIA

ON WALL FACE

INSTALL NEW GUARD

INSTALL NEW GUARD
(N) HANDRAIL LIMITS

REMOVE AND
REPLACE WITH 6"
FASCIA
6" FASCIA
LIMITS

REPLACE UPPER DAMAGED

CONCRETE SECTION WITH

NEW CONCRETE FOOTING

AND INSTALL NEW GUARD
END 6" FASCIA /
BEGIN 10" FASCIA
0SECTION B

SECTION D
40 0 30
1 10
0 40
30 60
0 50

SECTION C
1 00
0 80
0 20
0 0
50 0 70
0 60
0 0
.94

1.06 0 SECTION A
0 0
20 0
10 END 10"

FASCIA /
BEGIN 6"
FASCIA
(N) CONTROL

JOINT, TYPICAL
BEGIN 6"
FASCIA
BEGIN 6"
FASCIA
BEGIN 6"
FASCIA
(N) HANDRAIL LIMITS
(N) HANDRAIL LIMITS
1 2% CROSS SLOPE
1 2% CROSS SLOPE
1% CROSS SLOPE
(N) HANDRAIL LIMITS

BEGIN (N) GUARD

END (N) GUARD

END (N) GUARD
(N) GUARD LIMITS, PER DETAIL 2 ON
SHEET 10

END (N) GUARD
BEGIN (N) GUARD 3'
3'

2.5'
6"
3'

3.5'

4.5'
INSTALL NEW 7"

MONOLITHIC

TOPPING SLAB OVER

EXISTING SLAB
DEMOLISH EXISTING SLAB 7” DEEP AND
POUR NEW 7” THICK MONOLITHIC SLAB
Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 5
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 REPAIR SITE PLAN AND SECTIONS 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

AS SHOWN
FEET
0 10 20 30 40
11897 LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 APPROXIMATE HANDRAIL AND GUARD QUANTITIES:
(N) HANDRAIL = 45± LINEAR FEET
(N) GUARD = 257± LINEAR FEET
100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

-10
0 10
20 -10
0 10
20 0
20 40 60 80 100

ELEVATION
FEET
MHTL
MHTL

EXISTING RAILING
25 25

CROSS SECTION A
APPROXIMATE WATER LINE 5-23-2022 RIP RAP

EXISTING VERTICAL CONCRETE WALL

EXISTING VERTICAL

CONCRETE WALL

APPROXIMATE WATER
LINE 5-23-2022

EXISTING CONCRETE

PIER SURFACE

NEW FASCIA

3.5'
3'

NEW FASCIA (TEXTURED TO

MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE)
DEMOLISH EXISTING SLAB 7” DEEP AND
POUR NEW 7” THICK SLAB

2.5'

EXISTING RAILING

SPIRAL REBAR CAGE
2'
10"
6" ID
6" ID
NEW 2'X2.5' GUARD FOOTING
NEW 3'X3.5' GUARD FOOTING
12" 18"
SEE DETAIL C2
ON SHEET 9

SEE DETAIL B
ON SHEET 9
NEW 3'- 6" HIGH GUARD WITH 2" SCHEDULE 80 (OD 2.375")
ROUND ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEELTOP & BOTTOM
WITH 3/8" DIA VERTICAL SS DOWELS @ 3- 3/4" SPACING. SEE SHEET 8
10"

APPROXIMATE

TOPOGRAPHY

RIP RAP

RIP RAP
(EXTENT

UNKNOWN)

RIP RAP
(EXTENT

UNKNOWN)
?
?

EXISTING PIER

STRUCTURE
-10
0 10
20 0
10 20
0 20 40 60

ELEVATION
FEET
MHTL

CROSS SECTION B
25 APPROXIMATE WATER LINE 5-23-2022

NEW FASCIA

3.5'

SPIRAL REBAR CAGE
6" ID

EXISTING CONCRETE

PIER SURFACE
3' 10"

EXISTING VERTICAL

CONCRETE WALL

EXISTING RAILING
25 18"
NEW 3'- 6" HIGH GUARD WITH 2" SCHEDULE 80 (OD 2.375")
ROUND ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEELTOP & BOTTOM
WITH 3/8" DIA VERTICAL SS DOWELS @ 3- 3/4" SPACING. SEE SHEET 8

SEE DETAIL B
ON SHEET 9
DEMOLISH EXISTING SLAB 7” DEEP AND
POUR NEW 7” THICK SLAB

EXISTING PIER

STRUCTURE
Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 6
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 EXISTING CROSS SECTIONS A & B 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS
FEET
0 4 8 12 AS SHOWN
11897 LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

-10
0 10
20 -10
0 10
20 0
20 40 60 80 100

SAND/RIP-RAP

RIP-RAP
MHTL

LOWER CONCRETE DECK
MHTL
25 25

CROSS SECTION C
APPROX. WATER LINE
5-23-2022 APPROXIMATE WATER
LINE 5-23-2022

EXISTING CURB

EXISTING RAILING

EXISTING VERTICAL CONCRETE WALL

NEW FASCIA
4'

SPIRAL REBAR CAGE
6" ID

EXISTING RAILING

EXISING CONCRETE

PIER SURFACE

NEW FASCIA (TEXTURED TO

MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE)
DEMOLISH EXISTING SLAB 7" DEEP AND
POUR NEW 7" THICK SLAB

2.5'
2'
6"
6" ID

EXISTING VERTICAL

CONCRETE WALL
3' 6"

RIP-RAP
18" 12"

NEW FASCIA (TEXTURED TO

MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE)

2.5'
2'
6"
6" ID

EXISTING VERTICAL

CONCRETE WALL
12"
ADD NEW 7" THICK TOPPING SLAB
SEE DETAIL C1
ON SHEET 9
SEE DETAIL C2 ON SHEET 9
NEW 3'- 6" HIGH GUARD WITH 2" SCHEDULE 80 (OD 2.375") ROUND ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEELTOP & BOTTOM WITH 3/8" DIA VERTICAL SS DOWELS @ 3- 3/4" SPACING.

SEE SHEET 8

SAND / RIP

RAP (EXTENT

UNKNOWN)

RIP RAP
(EXTENT

UNKNOWN)
?
?
-10
0 10
20 -10
0 10
20 0
20 40 60 80 100

ELEVATION
FEET

SAND/RIP-RAP

RIP-RAP
MHTL
25 25

CROSS SECTION D

EXISTING VERTICAL CONCRETE WALL

APPROXIMATE WATER
LINE 5-23-2022
SAND

LOWER CONCRETE DECK

EXISTING CURB

NEW FASCIA (TEXTURED TO

MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE)

2.5'
2'
6"
6" ID
12"

EXISTING RAILING

EXISTING CONCRETE

PIER SURFACE

NEW FASCIA (TEXTURED TO

MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE)

2.5'
2'
6"
6" ID

EXISTING VERTICAL
12" CONCRETE WALL
ADD NEW 7" THICK TOPPING SLAB

EXISTING VERTICAL

CONCRETE WALL
NEW 3'- 6" HIGH GUARD WITH 2" SCHEDULE 80 (OD 2.375")
ROUND ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEELTOP & BOTTOM
WITH 3/8" DIA VERTICAL SS DOWELS @ 3- 3/4" SPACING. SEE SHEET 8
SEE DETAIL C2
ON SHEET 9
SEE DETAIL C2 ON SHEET 9

RIP RAP
(EXTENT

UNKNOWN)
?

RIP RAP
(EXTENT

UNKNOWN)
Date
Scale
Job

AS SHOWN
Drawn
MF
Sheet 7
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 EXISTING CROSS SECTIONS C & D 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS
FEET
0 4 8 12
11897 LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 8
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 FASCIA PATCH AND SLAB DETAILS 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

AS SHOWN

CROSS SECTION DETAIL OF NEW

VERTICAL WALL FASCIA - TYPICAL
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
FASCIA 6" TO 10" THICK AS

INDICATED ON PLAN & CROSS
SECTIONS. TEXTURE TO MATCH
ADJACENT SURFACES.
#3 CHROMX 4100 "L" BARS ON
24"X24" GRID - TYPICAL
18"
1/2" DRILLED HOLE WITH EPOXY
12"

EXISTING

CONCRETE

AND GROUTED

ROCK MIXTURE
#3 CHROMX 4100 BARS ON 12" OC

BOTH WAYS - TYPICAL
#3 CHROMX 4100 "L" BARS
ON 24"X24" GRID - TYPICAL
18"
1/2" DRILLED HOLE WITH EPOXY
12"

EXISTING CONCRETE

AND GROUTED ROCK

MIXTURE
#4 CHROMX 4100 BARS ON 12" OC

BOTH WAYS - TYPICAL

CONCRETE PIER SURFACE

EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB

THICKNESS VARIES

CROSS SECTION DETAIL OF NEW

CONCRETE TOPPING SLAB ON LOWER

PIER - TYPICAL

NEW CONCRETE TOPPING

SLAB OVERLAYING LOWER

PIER SURFACE (WHERE

INDICATED ON PLAN)
11897 LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 #3 CHROMX 4100 "L" BARS ON 24"X24" GRID - TYPICAL
18"
1/2" DRILLED HOLE WITH EPOXY
12"
#4 CHROMX 4100 BARS ON 12" OC

BOTH WAYS - TYPICAL

NEW CONCRETE PIER SURFACE

CROSS SECTION DETAIL OF NEW

CONCRETE SLAB ON UPPER PIER -

TYPICAL

NEW CONCRETE SLAB (DEMOLISH
UPPER 7" OF EXISTING UPPER PIER

SLAB AND REPLACE WITH NEW SLAB

WHERE INDICATED ON PLAN)

EXISTING CONCRETE

AND GROUTED ROCK

MIXTURE
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
EPOXY
1" X 1/4" SAWCUT FILLED WITH

SEMI-RIGID EPOXY RESIN FILLER
#4 CHROMX 4100 REBAR
(E) SLAB (N) SLAB
(E) SLAB AND (N) SLAB

CONNECTION DETAIL
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
2'
1" X 1/4" SAWCUT FILLED WITH
SEMI-RIGID EPOXY RESIN FILLER.

CONTROL JOINT LOCATION AS
INDICATED ON PLAN.
(N) MONOLITHIC SLAB,

TO BE BROOM FINISHED
7"
7"
(N) SLAB CONTROL JOINT
DETAIL
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
DETAIL 1
DETAIL 2
DETAIL 4
DETAIL 3
DETAIL 5
(N) MONOLITHIC SLAB,

TO BE BROOM FINISHED
100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 9
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 FOOTING AND SLAB DETAILS 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

AS SHOWN
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
NEW 10" THICK FASCIA

3.5'
NEW 42" HIGH GUARD
6" ID 316 SS SLEEVE
3'
10"

DETAIL B
4'

2.5'
2'
6"
3' 6"
DETAIL C1
DETAIL C2

EXISTING CONCRETE PIER SURFACE
DEMOLISH EXISTING SLAB 7" DEEP AND
POUR NEW 7" THICK SLAB

EXISTING VERTICAL CONCRETE WALL
NEW 3'H x 3.5'W GUARD FOOTING.

DEMOLISH EXISTING STRUCTURE
TO ACCOMMODATE NEW FOOTING.

FILL SLEEVE WITH MARINE GRADE

ELASTOMERIC FILLER
NEW 6" THICK FASCIA (TEXTURED TO

MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE)
NEW 42" HIGH GUARD

EXISTING CONCRETE PIER SURFACE
DEMOLISH EXISTING SLAB 7" DEEP AND
POUR NEW 7" THICK SLAB

EXISTING VERTICAL CONCRETE WALL
NEW 2'H x 2.5'W GUARD FOOTING.

DEMOLISH EXISTING STRUCTURE
TO ACCOMMODATE NEW FOOTING.

FILL SLEEVE WITH MARINE GRADE

ELASTOMERIC FILLER
NEW 42" HIGH GUARD

EXISTING CONCRETE PIER SURFACE
DEMOLISH EXISTING SLAB 7" DEEP AND
POUR NEW 7" THICK SLAB
NEW 6" THICK FASCIA
NEW 12" DIA 4" PITCH SPIRAL #3 CHROMX
4100 REBAR CAGE

EXISTING VERTICAL CONCRETE WALL
NEW 3'H x 4'W GUARD FOOTING.

DEMOLISH EXISTING STRUCTURE TO
ACCOMMODATE NEW FOOTING.

FILL SLEEVE WITH MARINE GRADE
ELASTOMERIC FILLER 18"
12"
18"
6" ID 316 SS SLEEVE
6" ID 316 SS SLEEVE
NOTES:

1. CONTINUOUSLY FILLET WELD TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL SLEEVE TO UPPER AND LOWER

SLEEVE COLLARS

2. VERTICAL GUARD POSTS TO BE CONTINUOUS AND PENETRATE BOTH SLEEVE COLLARS.

3. GUARD POSTS AND CAP TO BE 2" SCHEDULE 80 (OD 2.375") ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL

4. GUARD TO HAVE VERTICAL 1
2" BARS AT 4 INCH OC BETWEEN RAILING CAP AND LOWER
HORIZONTAL RAILING BAR 3.5 INCHES ABOVE CONCRETE SURFACE.

5. SAW CUT REMOVED AREAS OF DEMOLISHED CONCRETE TO PREVENT CRACKING OF ADJACENT CONCRETE WORK TO REMAIN IN PLACE.

6. DOWEL NEW FOOTINGS TO EXISTING GROUTED ROCK AND CONCRETE AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION.
#4 CHROMX 4100 REINFORCING BAR
@ 12" O. C. BOTH WAYS WITH
STANDARD HOOKS @ ENDS
NEW 12" DIA 4" PITCH SPIRAL #3 CHROMX
4100 REBAR CAGE
#4 CHROMX 4100 REINFORCING BAR
@ 12" O. C. BOTH WAYS WITH
STANDARD HOOKS @ ENDS
NEW 12" DIA 4" PITCH SPIRAL #3 CHROMX
4100 REBAR CAGE
#4 CHROMX 4100 REINFORCING BAR
@ 12" O. C. BOTH WAYS WITH
STANDARD HOOKS @ ENDS
11897 LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 939503.5' 2'-3"

2.4'

1.9'

3.5'

3.5'
100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

8'-5 1
4 " (TEN 11-1/4" TREADS)
EXISTING LANDING EL 1.52
4"
EL 1.5
ADD NEW 7" THICK TOPPING SLAB
EL 8.47

EXISTING LOWER
CONCRETE DECK EL 7.87

NEW FASCIA (TEXTURED TO

MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE)

1.5" ROUND SCHEDULE 80 (OD 1.90")
ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS

STEEL HANDRAIL ON INSIDE
STAIRWAY WALL @ 34" MIN TO 38"

MAX ABOVE NOSE OF TREADS
INSTALL 3'- 6" HIGH GUARD WITH 2"
SCHEDULE 80 (OD 2.375") ROUND ASTM
A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL TOP &
BOTTOM WITH 1/2" DIA VERTICAL SS
DOWELS @ 3- 3/4" SPACING ALONG EDGE

OF DECK

NEW FASCIA (TEXTURED TO

MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE)
ADD NEW 7" THICK TOPPING SLAB
6'- 4 5/16"
(ELEVEN 6-15/16" RISERS)
EXISTING LOWER CONCRETE DECK EL 7.87
NEW LANDING EL 2.12
#4 CHROMX 4100 REINFORCING BAR @ 12" O. C.

BOTH WAYS WITH STANDARD HOOKS @ ENDS
#4 CHROMX 4100 REINFORCING
BAR @ 12" O. C. BOTH WAYS
WITH STANDARD HOOKS @
ENDS
#4 CHROMX 4100 REINFORCING BAR
@ 12" O. C. BOTH WAYS WITH
STANDARD HOOKS @ ENDS 4"
111
4 " 6
15 16" R=1
2 "
NEW SLAB EL 8.47
3'- 0"

LANDING
NEW LOWER DECK SURFACE EL 8.75
#4 CHROMX 4100 REINFORCING BAR
@ 12" O. C. BOTH WAYS WITH
STANDARD HOOKS @ ENDS
(E) UPPER CONCRETE DECK EL14.19
7'-6" (EIGHT 11-1/4" TREADS)
EXISTING LOWER CONCRETE DECK EL 8.17
ADD NEW 7" THICK TOPPING SLAB
4'- 11-7/16"
(NINE 6-5/8" RISERS)
#4 CHROMX 4100 REINFORCING BAR @ 12" O. C.

BOTH WAYS WITH STANDARD HOOKS @ ENDS

1.5" ROUND SCHEDULE 80 (OD 1.90")
ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS

STEEL HANDRAIL ON INSIDE
STAIRWAY WALL @ 34" MIN TO 38"

MAX ABOVE NOSE OF TREADS
INSTALL 3'- 6" HIGH GUARD WITH 2"
SCHEDULE 80 (OD 2.375") ROUND ASTM
A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL TOP &
BOTTOM WITH 1/2" DIA VERTICAL SS
DOWELS @ 3- 3/4" SPACING ALONG EDGE

OF DECK
111
4 "
1" TYP

NON-SLIP GROOVES

TO BE TOOLED INTO

WET CONCRETE BY
FINISHER 1/4"W x
1/2" D (TYP FOR ALL
STEPS)
6 5
8 "

AS SHOWN
Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 10
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 GUARD AND HANDRAIL DETAILS 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

STAIRS TO WATER FROM LOWER DECK
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"

STAIRS FROM UPPER PIER SURFACE TO LOWER DECK
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"
11897 LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950

REQUIRED SAFETY

SIGNANGE AT UPPER AND

LOWER PIERS
NEW 42" HIGH GUARD ABOVE

WALKING SURFACE AND NOSE

OF TREADS
6" ID 316 SS SLEEVE
3'
18"
NEW 1.5" ROUND SCHEDULE 80 (OD 1.90")
ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL
HANDRAIL @ NOSE OF STAIR TREADS
FILL SCHEDULE 40 - 1/4-INCH WALL
THICKNESS TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL

SLEEVE WITH MARINE GRADE

ELASTOMERIC FILLER
SCHEDULE 40 - 1/4-INCH WALL THICKNESS
TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL SLEEVE

CONTINUOUS FILLET WELD

CONTINUOUS FILLET WELD

GUARD AND HANDRAIL DETAIL
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"
NEW GUARD WITH 2" SCHEDULE
80 (OD 2.375") ROUND ASTM
A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS

STEEL TOP AND BOTTOM WITH
1/2" DIA VERTICAL SS DOWELS
@ 3-3/4" SPACING

WALKING SURFACE
NEW 42" HIGH GUARD ABOVE

WALKING SURFACE AND NOSE

OF TREADS
2'
NEW 1.5" ROUND SCHEDULE 80 (OD 1.90")
ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL
HANDRAIL @ NOSE OF STAIR TREADS
8"L X 3/8"DIA TYPE 316

CONCRETE SCREWS

WALKING SURFACE
6"
NEW 6" THICK FASCIA

LOWER PIER GUARD AND HANDRAIL

DETAIL AT LOWER STAIRS
SCALE: 1"=1'-0"

3.5'
NEW GUARD WITH 2" SCHEDULE
80 (OD 2.375") ROUND ASTM
A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS

STEEL TOP AND BOTTOM WITH
1/2" DIA VERTICAL SS DOWELS
@ 3-3/4" SPACING
4"
8"
8"
4"
DETAIL 1
DETAIL 2
100% PLANS
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
PGCC 6-7-2023

Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 11
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 STRUCTURAL NOTES 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

AS SHOWN

STANDARD HOOKS & DEVELOPMENT LENGTH FOR TENSION BARS
90 DEGREE HOOK
BAR MIN. INSIDE EXTENSION

STRAIGHT
SIZE DIAMETER (IN.) ℓext (IN.)
NO. 3
NO. 4
NO. 5
NO. 6
NO. 7
NO. 8

2.25 3.0

3.75 4.5

5.25 6.0

4.5 6.0

7.5 9.0

10.5 12.0
180 DEGREE HOOK
BAR MIN. INSIDE EXTENSION

STRAIGHT
SIZE DIAMETER (IN.) ℓext (IN.)
NO. 3
NO. 4
NO. 5
NO. 6
NO. 7
NO. 8

2.25 3.0

3.75 4.5

5.25 6.0

2.5 2.5

2.5 3.0

3.5 4.0
ℓdh

BARS IN TENSION
BAR
SIZE
NO. 4
NO. 5
NO. 6
NO. 7

6.5 8.0

9.5 11.0
(IN.)

DEVELOPMENT LENGTH & SPLICE (BARS IN TENSION)
(fy=100 ksi & f'c=4.5 ksi)
(CLEAR SPACING OF BARS OR WIRES BEING DEVELOPED OR LAP SPLICED AT LEAST 2db AND CLEAR COVER AT LEAST db) (fy=80 ksi & f'c=4.5 ksi) ℓd
BAR
SIZE
NO. 4
NO. 5
NO. 6
NO. 7
31 39
47 68
(IN.)

CLASS B SPLICE
ℓd (IN.)

40.5 51.0

61.1 88.5
NO. 3 6.0

5. REBAR EMBEDMENT & EPOXY BONDING
A. HOLE DIMENSIONS
THE ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN THE REBAR AND HOLE SHOULD BE AS SMALL AS POSSIBLE, YET STILL PROVIDE EASE OF PLACEMENT.

THE MINIMUM DEPTH OF EMBEDMENT SHALL BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES. LOWER STRENGTH MATERIALS IN THE EMBEDMENT ZONE WILL REQUIRE 12 TO 18 INCHES.

B. SURFACE PREPARATION
REBAR MUST BE CLEAN, DRY AND DEGREASED.

DRY DRILLING: VACUUM OR BLOW OUT HOLE USING OIL-FREE COMPRESSED AIR WET DRILLING: WASH OUT HOLE WITH CLEAN WATER TO REMOVE RESIDUE OF DRILLING SLURRY. REMOVE STANDING WATER AND ALLOW THE HOLE(S) TO DRY.

CLEAN OUT DRILLED HOLE WITH A WIRE BRUSH TO ENSURE ALL DEBRIS IS REMOVED, C. MIXING
FOR EASE OF MIXING AND HANDLING, EPOXY SHOULD BE CONDITIONED TO 70°F. FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MIXING.

D. INSTALLATION
FOR HORIZONTAL SURFACES, TWO METHODS ARE ACCEPTABLE:
1- POUR EPOXY GROUT INTO THE HOLE AND INSERT REBAR AND WORK IT UP AND DOWN. LIGHTLY TAP TO ENSURE COMPLETE EMBEDMENT. 2- INSERT REBAR INTO DRILLED HOLE AND POUR EPOXY GROUT AROUND IT. USE TEMPLATE OR WEDGES IF NECESSARY TO HOLD IN POSITION.

FOR VERTICAL AND OVERHEAD SURFACES:

PLACE EPOXY GROUT INTO DRILLED HOLE WITH HAND OR POWER OPERATED BULK CAULKING GUN WITH LARGE DIAMETER TIP AND POLYETHYLENE EXTENSION TUB. INSERT BOLT, DOWEL OR REBAR AND WORK BACK AND FORTH TO ENSURE COMPLETE EMBEDMENT. POSITION IN PLACE WITH TEMPLATE OR WEDGES IF NECESSARY.

E. CURING
THE CURE TIME IS DEPENDENT UPON THE TEMPERATURE OF THE SUBSTRATE. TO ACCELERATE CURE (VERIFY THIS WITH MANUFACTURER), PRE-HEAT BOLTS TO APPROXIMATELY 150°F (66°C) AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION AND MAINTAIN ARTIFICIAL HEAT ON BOLT AND SURROUNDING AREA.

PLACEMENT AND COVERAGE: ENSURE THAT REINFORCEMENT AND EMBEDDED ITEMS IN STRUCTURAL WALLS ARE NOT DISTURBING PLACEMENT OF SHOTCRETE/CONCRETE. MINIMUM SHOTCRETE AND CONCRETE COVERAGE TO REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE AS NOTED IN THE DRAWINGS. ARTIFICIAL ROCK FACING SHALL BE 6" TO 10" THICK COLORED & TEXTURED SHOTCRETE.

TESTING: CONCRETE MATERIALS SHALL BE TESTED BY A TESTING AGENCY APPROVED BY THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE AND HKA. ONLY TESTED CONCRETE SHALL BE USED. SPECIAL INSPECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR CONCRETE PER CHAPTER 17 OF THE C.B.C. MAINTAIN COMPLETE RECORDS OF PLACED CONCRETE INCLUDING:

DATE, LOCATION, QUANTITY AND TEST SAMPLES TAKEN. TAKE FOUR TEST CYLINDERS OR ONE TEST PANEL FOR SHOTCRETE PER 50 CU YARDS OF CONCRETE PLACED EACH DAY, BUT NO LESS THAN FOUR TEST CYLINDERS OR ONE SHOTCRETE PANEL FOR EACH DAY THAT CONCRETE IS PLACED.

PROTECTION: PROTECT SHOTCRETE AND CONCRETE FROM PREMATURE DRYING, MAINTAINING MINIMAL WATER

LOSS AT A RELATIVELY CONSTANT TEMPERATURE FOR A PERIOD NECESSARY FOR HYDRATION OF CEMENT AND HARDENING OF SHOTCRETE/CONCRETE. IN CASE OF EXPOSURE TO SALT WATER, WASH THE SURFACE TO RECEIVE SHOTCRETE/CONCRETE WITH POTABLE WATER JUST PRIOR TO SHOTCRETE/CONCRETE PLACEMENT.

SHOTCRETE OR GUNITE: PROPORTIONING, MIXING AND PLACEMENT OF SHOTCRETE OR GUNITE SHALL COMPLY WITH ACI 506R. LAPPING OF THE REINFORCING SPLICES ARE PERMITTED IF THE SPACING AT THE REINFORCING IS OPEN ENOUGH TO ALLOW CLEAR, UNOBSTRUCTED ACCESS TO BOTH SIDES OF THE REINFORCING. IF NOT, THE LAPPED BARS SHOULD BE SPACED AT LEAST THREE TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE LARGEST BAR AT THE SPLICE.

CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH PROVEN PERFORMANCE RECORD ON SIMILAR TYPE OF PROJECTS, USING THE SAME QUALIFIED NOZZLEMAN, CREW AND EQUIPMENT.

BACKFORMING SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF OVEREXCAVATION OR VOIDS. BACKFORMING COSTS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT PRICE. DAMPEN SURFACES TO RECEIVE SHOTCRETE. ALL REBOUND SHOTCRETE MATERIAL SHALL BE COLLECTED AND DISPOSED OF. NO SHOTCRETE MATERIAL SHALL BE DUMPED INTO OCEAN WATER OR LEFT ON BEACH. COVER SHOTCRETE WALL AREAS FOR CURING AND PROTECTION. LAYERS OF SHOTCRETE AND CONSTRUCTION JOINTS TO RECEIVE SHOTCRETE SHALL BE DAMPENED BY POTABLE WATER. IN

CASE OF EXPOSURE TO SALTWATER, WASH UNDERLYING SHOTCRETE SURFACE TO RECEIVE ADDITIONAL SHOTCRETE WITH POTABLE WATER JUST PRIOR TO ADDITIONAL SHOTCRETE PLACEMENT.

1. ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE [C.B.C.] AND ANY LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. ALL DETAILS, SECTIONS AND NOTES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED TO BE TYPICAL AND SHALL APPLY TO SIMILAR SITUATIONS ELSEWHERE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECOGNIZE THAT THE PLANS USED FOR THE DRAWINGS MAY DIFFER FROM THE ACTUAL PHYSICAL SITE. DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. CHECK ALL DIMENSIONS IN RELATION TO SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE WORK OF ALL TRADES. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER AND SHALL BE RESOLVED BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF CONSTRUCTION AND PERSONNEL.

PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHORING, BRACING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL SAFETY ORDINANCES.

2. DESIGN OF THE INTERIM REPAIR OF THE LOVERS POINT PIER IS BASED ON RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES , INC. (HKA), GEOTECHNICAL AND COASTAL ENGINEERS, WATSONVILLE, CA (PROJECT NO.

M11897.2). ANY STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS OR DETAILS NOT PREPARED BY HKA SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY HKA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CONCRETE AND GROUTED ROCK SURFACES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF STEEL AND CONCRETE.

6. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS
EPOXY BONDED REBAR MUST BE INSTALLED AND GROUTED IN THE PRESENCE OF HKA.

CONCRETE SHALL BE SAMPLED AND TESTED AS PROVIDED ELSEWHERE IN THESE NOTES (SEE SHEET 14).

SHOTCRETE APPLICATION SHALL BE OBSERVED BY THE HKA AND SHALL BE SAMPLED AND TESTED AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER (SEE SHEET 14).

SHEET 14 CONTAINS A SPECIAL INSPECTION SCHEDULE WITH FREQUENCY OF INSPECTIONS NOTED.

7. INSPECTIONS

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR ALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND HKA INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INCLUDE STRUCTURAL CONCRETE TESTING AND SHOTCRETE TESTING. NOTE THE FOLLOWING REGARDING THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION:

A. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF OBSERVATIONS, THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL A WRITTEN STATEMENT IDENTIFYING THE FREQUENCY AND EXTENT OF STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION.

B. PROVIDE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS ON THE PLANS INDICATING WHICH SIGNIFICANT CONSTRUCTION STAGES, INCLUDING THE COMPLETION OF THE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM, ARE TO BE VISUALLY OBSERVED. [§1705 CBC] C. AT THE CONCLUSION OF WORK INCLUDED IN THE PERMIT, THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE

BUILDING OFFICIAL A WRITTEN STATEMENT THAT THE SITE VISITS HAVE BEEN MADE AND IDENTIFY ANY

REPORTED DEFICIENCIES WHICH, TO THE BEST OF THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER'S KNOWLEDGE, HAVE NOT BEEN CORRECTED.

3. SHOTCRETE AND CONCRETE
A. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE TEST PANEL PRIOR TO PLACEMENT AT THE SITE TO DEMONSTRATE PROPER

MIX DESIGN
B. STRENGTH: SHOTCRETE AND CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A 28-DAY MINIMUM ULTIMATE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AS FOLLOWS:

ARTIFICIAL ROCK FASCIA 5,000 PSI
B. SHOTCRETE AND CONCRETE MIXES: PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:

PORTLAND CEMENT: ASTM-A150, TYPE II, 8 SACKS/CY. MINIMUM.

POZZOLAN: MAY BE A MAXIMUM OF 20% OF THE 8 SACKS/CY. OF CEMENT.

AIR ENTRAINMENT: NOT ALLOWED FOR ANY SHOTCRETE OR CONCRETE.

4. REINFORCING STEEL
ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE CHROMX 4100 BY MMFX TECHNOLOGIES CONFORMING TO ASTM A1035/A 1035M GRADE 100. TIE WIRE SHALL BE 16 GA. ANNEALED WIRE. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE EPOXY COATED. REBAR SHALL BE RIGIDLY HELD IN PLACE WITH APPROVED DEVICES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF SHOTCRETE AND CONCRETE. USE PLASTIC REBAR CHAIRS AND BOLSTERS WITH STRENGTH TO WITHSTAND 300 LBS. CONCENTRATED LOAD WITHOUT PERMANENT DEFORMATION OR BREAKAGE. HOOKS, BENDS, FABRICATION AND PLACING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR DETAILING REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE" ACI NO. 315. REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SALT WATER MIST BY PROVIDING ADEQUATE BLANKET COVERING. REMOVE COVER JUST PRIOR TO SHOTCRETE/CONCRETE PLACEMENT. IN CASE OF EXPOSURE TO SALT WATER, WASH STEEL REINFORCEMENT WITH POTABLE WATER JUST PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.

SHOTCRETE AND CONCRETE SHALL BE MACHINE MIXED. SUBMIT CONCRETE MIX DESIGNS TO ENGINEERS FOR APPROVAL.

MAX. WATER-SOLUBLE
CHLORIDE ION IN CONC.
3/8 MAX (PEAGRAVEL OK)

0.40 MAX
NO
NO
8 MIN
5,000 PSI MIN

SEALER REQUIRED

WATER REDUCER

MAX WATER/CEMENT

AGGREGATE

ACCELERATOR

INTEGRAL COLOR

SACKS OF CEMENT

STRENGTH
15% OF CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL

SHOTCRETE FASCIA

0.15 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF CEMENT
CONCRETE/SHOTCRETE TO COMPLY WITH ACI 318-22, TABLE 4.3.1 FOR EXPOSURE CLASS C2

CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT TEST RESULTS INDICATING MIX DESIGN COMPLIES WITH MAXIMUM WATER-SOLUBLE

CHLORIDE ION CONTENT IN CONCRETE PRIOR TO POUR OF CONCRETE AND/OR APPLICATION OF SHOTCRETE GRADE 100 REINF. COVER 3 INCH MIN

8. HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS
HANDRAILS SHALL BE 1.5" INCH ROUND SCHEDULE 80 ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL AS MANUFACTURED AND INSTALLED BY "AGS STAINLESS" OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. GUARDS SHALL BE 2" SCHEDULE 80 ROUND ASTM A554 TYPE A316 STAINLESS STEEL MANUFACTURED AND INSTALLED BY "AGS STAINLESS" OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
ℓdh ℓext
db
ℓdh
ℓext
db

POINT OF WHICH

BAR IS DEVELOPED
180
° DIAMETER BEND
(6db NO. 3 THRU NO. 8)
(8db NO. 9 THRU NO. 11)

GREATER OF
4db & 2.5 IN.

NOT WITHOUT ENG APPROVAL

OK IF NEEDED
NO. 3 24 32.0
11897
MAX. WATER-SOLUBLE
CHLORIDE ION IN CONC.

FLY ASH (POZZOLAN)
3/4 MAX

0.40 MAX
NO
NO
8 MIN
5,000 PSI MIN

SEALER REQUIRED

WATER REDUCER

MAX WATER/CEMENT

AGGREGATE

ACCELERATOR

INTEGRAL COLOR

SACKS OF CEMENT

STRENGTH
15% OF CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL

CONCRETE SLABS, BEAMS, AND STAIRS

0.15 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF CEMENT
GRADE 100 REINF. COVER 3 INCH MIN

NOT WITHOUT ENG APPROVAL

OK IF NEEDED

MAX SLUMP

AIR CONTENT
4 +/- 1 INCHES
1-2% MAXIMUM (ENTRAPPED AIR ONLY)
SILICA FUME (MINERAL ADMIXTURE) 10% OF CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL

FLY ASH (POZZOLAN)

MAX SLUMP

AIR CONTENT
2 +/- 1 INCHES
1-2% MAXIMUM (ENTRAPPED AIR ONLY)
SILICA FUME (MINERAL ADMIXTURE) 10% OF CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL

PLASTICIZER NOT PERMITTED
PLASTICIZER AS SPECIFIED BY READY MIX COMPANY LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS

CORROSION INHIBITOR PER MANUFACTURER SPEC

CORROSION INHIBITOR PER MANUFACTURER SPEC
PGCC 6-7-2023

Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 12
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 GENERAL NOTES 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

GENERAL NOTES

PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW
The purpose of the Lovers Point Pier Interim Repair Project (Project) is to provide short-term structural repairs to the exterior of the Lovers Point Pier in Pacific Grove, CA to maintain the integrity of the core of the pier, and to replace the perimeter railing and stairways for public safety.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND THEIR ANSWERS
1) What heavy machinery is proposed to be used and at which phases of construction is heavy equipment required? Equipment will be determined after selection of the Contractor. 2) Where is the construction staging area? Will construction equipment and materials be stored on the beach? The staging area will be the parking lot delineated on Sheet 3, Staging and Access, per City request on 1/31/2023. 3) Will the construction be done primarily from the blufftop above, or will construction primarily take place from the pier?
Not applicable to this Project.
4) If construction will take place from the pier, how will heavy equipment gain access to the construction area? The Contractor will drive equipment down to the pier via the access route delineated in Sheet 3, Staging and Access.

The Contractor will remove the equipment from the pier at the end of each work day. 5) How much of the adjacent park and beach areas will be impacted by construction activities and for how long? The area of the project where active construction operations are being performed should remain closed to public access during the work due to safety concerns. The Contractor is anticipating +/- (TBD) working days to complete their work. This will be adjusted as necessary to take advantage of favorable tide and daylight conditions and will be impacted by unfavorable conditions. The actual duration will be governed by these conditions. 6) If public access will be closed during construction, please describe why it will be necessary to close public access and the estimated duration of the closure.

As explained above, the pier area should remain closed to public access for the duration of the project to allow for public safety. When conditions are safe for the public to enter the work area, those areas will be reopened for public use.
7) Will construction equipment and activities enter the waters of the Monterey Bay? The Contractor does not anticipate entering the water with any equipment. Contractor shall utilize means and methods to protect the waters of Monterey Bay and prevent any debris or wet concrete from entering those waters. 8) What will the duration and timing of construction be? The duration of construction will be determined by the Contractor. The Contractor shall develop a schedule that is coordinated with the City of Pacific Grove Public Works Department prior to the start of construction an shall provide that schedule to the Engineer. The schedule for completing the required work may be dependent on tide levels and ocean wave runup and will be determined once all permits are in hand.

MARINE PROTECTION
To prevent any impacts upon the marine habitat, no non-native spoils or debris shall be allowed to enter these areas or shall be allowed to adversely impact the beach or enter the tidal waters. Under no circumstances shall use of equipment be allowed seaward of the Mean High Tide Line in areas where water is present. Equipment and vehicle use on the beach during construction shall be minimized. Contractor employee parking shall be permitted in designated parking areas only. Although construction activity will occur on the beach and near ocean areas, such activity must be strictly confined to the area where work is required. Any areas of loose or unstable soil must be stabilized immediately. Any heavy equipment operation must be conducted with care near the edge of the water to prevent damage to the habitat. Care must be taken so the inland and beach areas outside the work area are not damaged during construction. If a fuel or lubricant spill occurs, immediate notification of the Engineer and appropriate authorities shall be made. Any equipment driven onto the beach should be well maintained and inspected daily to verify that there are no fuel, hydraulic fluid or lubricant leaks.

ACCESS PROTECTION
The proposed access route is on The City of Pacific Grove property. Impacts to the access route must be minimized.

The impacts to beach access and residential access must be minimized. Appropriate signage shall be used to make sure that beach users know what to do as they approach the work sites. The Contractor shall be responsible for the restoration of the access route and staging area to its original condition. The Contractor shall use access routes and staging areas as directed by the Owner and shall repair access routes and staging areas to pre-project condition or better as directed by the Owner. The Contractor shall not close or obstruct streets, walks, drives or other occupied or used spaces or facilities without the written permission of the Owner. Underground utilities are located under the access route and shall be protected from damage.

EXAMINATION OF JOB SITE, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. The Contractor shall carefully examine the work site and the Plans and Specifications. The submission of a bid shall be conclusive evidence that the Contractor has investigated and is satisfied as to the conditions to be encountered, as to the character, quality, and scope of work to be performed, the quantities of materials to be furnished and as to the requirements of the Geotechnical and Coastal Engineering Investigation and Plans and these Specifications. The plans consist of 14 sheets.

B. The City of Pacific Grove is the Owner of the Project Area. Haro, Kasunich and Associates, Inc. (HKA), Consulting Geotechnical, Coastal and Civil Engineers, is the Engineer for the Project and will represent the Owner during design and construction of the Project.

C. The contractor shall recognize that the plans used for the drawings of the Pier Structure may differ from the actual physical site. Dimensions are approximate. Before proceeding with the work, it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to check the site in relation to the drawings and specifications. Report any discrepancies to the Owner and the Engineer.

D. The Contractor must attend a pre-bid meeting with the Engineer prior to submitting a proposal to complete the proposed work. The Contractor will be required to attend a pre-construction meeting with the Engineer prior to the commencement of construction. The purpose of these meetings is so the Contractor may ask questions concerning the work and to make sure the Contractor understands the permit conditions and environmental constraints.

COMPLIANCE WITH CODES:

A. All construction and materials shall be as specified and as required by the 2022 California Building Code, the Building Code Standards, locally enforced codes and authorities. All articles, materials and equipment shall be installed, applied and connected as directed by the manufacturer's latest written specifications except where otherwise noted.

B. The Contractor shall be fully informed of all applicable codes, laws, ordinances and regulations of any jurisdiction or authority, and shall adhere strictly thereto. Compliance with all laws, ordinances and regulations of Federal, State, County and Local agencies shall take precedence over all other Contract documents.

INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE
HKA shall be called to perform construction observation and to make a final inspection of the site to assure that the work is completed according to plan. Winter storm inspections shall be conducted to identify problem areas and assess the need for corrective actions. Written documentation should be maintained that notes inspection dates, corrective actions needed and corrective actions taken. The Owner and their representatives shall have the right to inspect any material brought to the job site and shall have the right to reject any materials deemed defective or not conforming to the specifications. HKA shall be called to perform construction observation and to make a final inspection of the drainage and erosion control facilities to assure that the work is completed according to plan. Written documentation should be maintained that notes inspection dates, corrective actions needed and corrective actions taken.

NOTIFICATION OF ENGINEER
The Engineer should be notified at least fourteen (14) working days prior to any site clearing or grading so that the work in the field can be coordinated with the grading contractor, and arrangements for surveying, testing and observation can be made.

TIMETABLE
These plans show the proposed work to be implemented after review and approval from the City of Pacific Grove.

WORK HOUR RESTRICTIONS
Tidal conditions may restrict the available work hours. Wave runup related flood conditions may restrict the available work time. Hours of operation or movement of heavy construction equipment shall be limited to between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Such operations shall not occur on Sundays or holidays unless otherwise approved by the City of Pacific Grove.

NOISE CONTROL
All equipment that will operate at the project site shall be equipped with residential type mufflers.

SITE DISTURBANCE
Disturbance of the property beyond the limits of the necessary work area shall be avoided. Sensitive habitat exists immediately adjacent to the work area. The Contractor should expect regulatory agencies to be particularly concerned about any impacts outside the work area.

STAKING AND LOCATION

1. A surveyor shall locate design locations and mark with stakes prior to construction, for review by Engineer and use during construction by contractor. The contractor shall pay for staking.

2. Reference points will be established by the Engineer or by the Surveyor. These reference points will be used to control placement of the structures relative to cultural features and to elevation. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to furnish and set such additional marks and stakes as is determined necessary to establish lines and grades required for the completion of the work specified, as shown on the plans. The contractor shall have a grade checker on site to check elevations and control the position of the work.

3. Local survey control: Spikes will be set for use as elevation control points. Do not disturb spikes. The vertical elevation datum is NAVD1988.

DRAINPIPES AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
Existing drainpipes and underground utilities within the work area shall be located by the Contractor and avoided and/or protected during construction.

A. The Contractor shall locate, identify, and protect utilities from damage. Location of existing utilities shown on plans is approximate. The existing underground utility locations are not shown on the plans. The Contractor is responsible for locating all existing utilities prior to starting work and protecting utilities throughout course of work.

The locations of any existing drain facilities shown on the plans are approximate. The contractor shall verify locations and protect in place, if within the limits of work. The contractor shall plug, cap, or reconnect /reinstall existing drainage facilities damaged during construction, as directed by engineer.

B. The Contractor shall not interrupt utilities serving occupied or used facilities without the written permission of the Owner and authorities having jurisdiction. If necessary, provide temporary utilities.

C. The Contractor shall notify the Owner prior to shut-off of existing utilities.

GRADING
No grading of earth materials is proposed as part of the project. Some demolition of concrete materials will occur.

Demolished concrete materials shall be removed from the site and disposed of at an approved disposal site. No concrete rubble derived from demolition shall be allowed to enter the ocean waters.

EROSION CONTROL
During construction, erosion control measures shall be in place. These construction measures shall be in the form of dust control, straw mulch, straw bales and wattles placed at the appropriate areas of work as approved by the Engineer.

SUPPLEMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS
If undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned at this time, Haro, Kasunich and Associates, Inc., shall be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be given.

Deleterious Materials: The Contractor shall carefully excavate all materials necessary, of whatever nature, for construction of the work. Any material of an unsuitable or deleterious nature discovered during excavation shall be brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Engineer before proceeding with the work.

Voids: Any voids exposed during excavation work shall be backfilled as directed by the Engineer.

Excavation: Sands, soils and bedrock materials excavated during construction shall be exported to an approved dumpsite, as directed by the Engineer.

Temporary Cut Slopes: Maximum gradients shall not exceed 1.0:1.0 (H:V), except in hard bedrock. Temporary cut slopes must be inspected by the Engineer during excavation, to determine the need for temporary shoring or temporary underpinning of adjacent retaining structures and/or improvements. The Contractor shall be required to implement shoring as required by the Engineer and as required by OSHA and other regulatory agencies.

Drainage Pipes: All drainage discharge locations shall be approved by the Engineer.

DUST CONTROL
For dust control purposes, watering of exposed surfaces during clearing, excavation, stockpiling and grading, and in the late morning and the end of each workday shall be done. Grading activities shall be prohibited during periods of high winds greater than 30 miles an hour.

EROSION CONTROL
During construction, erosion control measures shall be in place in areas to be graded, as well as around the stockpiled soils. These construction measures shall be in the form of dust control, straw mulch, straw bales and wattles and/or silt fences placed at the appropriate areas of work as directed by the Engineer.

SUPPLEMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS
If undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned at this time, our firm shall be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be given.

AS SHOWN
11897 LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS
PGCC 6-7-2023

Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 13
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & BEST MANAGEMENT PLAN PROVISIONS 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN PROVISIONS
The Lovers Point Pier Repair Project (Project) proposes short-term structural repairs to the exterior of the pier to maintain the integrity of the core of the pier, and replacement of the perimeter railing and stairways for public safety. The Project would include replacement of approximately 165 linear feet of railing on the upper platform, replacement of approximately 85 linear feet of low-profile bull rail on the lower platform, and reconstruction of the concrete stairs and topping slab on both the upper and lower pier platforms. The Project would also include installing up to 2,000 square feet (up to 40 cubic yards) of reinforced shotcrete around the perimeter of the pier to protect the integrity of the pier. Reconstruction of the topping slab includes removing 7 inches of the topping slab (walking surface) concrete on both the upper pier platform (approximately 1,150 square feet) and lower pier platform (approximately 900 square feet), doweling into the existing remaining concrete slab, and installing new reinforced concrete slab of same thickness. The reconstructed stairways will be built to current code standards and include guardrails and handrailing.

The Lovers Point Pier repair project would occur in a single phase and be scheduled to minimize impacts during the busy summer months between Memorial Day and Labor Day. The construction staging area will be located in the adjacent park and fenced off from the public, and have a contractor trailer, temporary utilities, and gated entrance.

The Project is within City limits and is a public area that falls under the City's recently updated Local Coastal Plan (LCP). The Project construction laydown and staging area will be in the adjacent park open space area and repairs are anticipated to be performed with only land-based equipment. The construction laydown and staging area is approximately 1,000 square feet, as shown in Sheet 3.

Installation of the pier perimeter shotcrete will be done only during low tide and scaffolding will be installed on the sides of the pier for over water work. Construction best management practices (BMPs) will be implemented during the duration of the Project and include prevention measures related to over water work and the protection of adjacent waterways. Traffic along Ocean View Boulevard will be maintained except during material transfers during demolition and construction.

The Project shall conform to requirements of these plans and specifications, as well as permit obtained for the project with the more stringent requirements taking precedence.

All work shall take place during daylight hours, and lighting of the beach and ocean area is prohibited.

Grading of intertidal areas is prohibited, except removal of existing debris, concrete, rubble, etc., is allowed in these areas.

Construction (including but not limited to construction activities, and materials and/or equipment storage) is prohibited outside of the defined construction, staging, and storage areas.

Equipment washing, servicing, and refueling shall not take place on the beach, and shall only be allowed at a designated inland location.

Appropriate best management practices shall be used to ensure that no spills of petroleum products or other chemicals take place during these activities. Spill kits will be placed onsite.

The construction site shall maintain good construction site housekeeping controls and procedures (e.g., clean up all leaks, drips, and other spills immediately; keep materials covered and out of the rain, including covering exposed piles of soil and wastes; dispose of all wastes properly, place trash receptacles on site for that purpose, and cover open trash receptacles during wet weather; remove all construction debris from the beach; etc.).

All erosion and sediment controls shall be in place prior to the commencement of construction as well as at the end of each workday. As needed, silt fences, or equivalent apparatus, shall be installed at the perimeter of the construction site to prevent construction-related runoff and/or sediment from entering into Monterey Bay.

All public recreational use areas and all beach access points impacted by construction activities shall be restored to their pre-construction condition or better within three days of completion of construction.

The Permittee shall notify planning staff of the Coastal Commission's Central Coast District Office at least three working days in advance of commencement of construction or maintenance activities and immediately upon completion of construction or maintenance activities.

Minor adjustments to these construction requirements may be allowed by the Executive Director if such adjustments: (1) are deemed reasonable and necessary; and (2) do not adversely impact coastal resources.

ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
Nothing in these additional construction requirements shall change the need to comply with the Coastal Commission requirements listed above. If questions arise, request clarification from the Project Engineer or Engineering Geologist.

Construction access shall be as directed by owner. Impacts to the access route must be minimized and disturbance along the access route must be restored to pre-construction conditions upon project completion. The following provisions shall apply to the work.

Any debris generated during construction shall be removed from the site.

All work shall take place during daylight hours and lighting of the beach area is prohibited unless, due to extenuating circumstances, the City of Pacific Grove Public Works Director or Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission authorizes non-daylight work and/or beach area lighting.

Construction work and equipment operations shall not be conducted seaward of the mean high water line, with the exception of removal of the existing rip rap that is seaward of the mean high water line.

All construction equipment shall remain as far landward as possible, and shall avoid contact with ocean waters and intertidal areas.

All erosion and sediment controls shall be in place prior to the commencement of construction as well as at the end of each work day.

Silt fences, or equivalent apparatus, may be installed at the perimeter of the construction site to prevent construction related runoff and/or sediment from entering into the Pacific Ocean. Fencing may be used on the beach for erosion and sediment controls as necessary to contain rock and/or sediments at the project site.

All construction materials and equipment placed on the beach shall be stored beyond the reach of waves and extreme tides, and shall be removed from the beach if necessary to avoid inundation. Materials that remain on the beach overnight must be located in the dry sand back shore area, as close to the toe of the bluff as possible. The extent of overnight storage areas shall be kept the minimum necessary.

No fueling, or fuel storage shall be allowed on the beach at any time.

The Contractor (and Permittee) shall monitor weather forecasts and move all construction equipment and materials off of the beach in advance of storm or extreme tidal events.

Construction (including but not limited to construction activities, and materials and/or equipment storage) is prohibited outside of the defined construction, staging, and storage areas.

No work shall occur on the pier during weekends or Holidays unless, due to extenuating circumstances (such as tidal issues or other environmental concerns), and the City of Pacific Grove Public Works Director or Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission authorizes such work.

All heavy equipment used for concrete pouring shall be set at least 25 feet landward of the pier entrance and shall use flexible hoses or articulated booms to deliver concrete to the project site. Other heavy equipment may be used periodically atop the pier, but shall be removed from the pier when not in use.

Equipment washing, refueling, and/or servicing shall not take place on the beach, or within 50 feet of the shoreline.

Petroleum products and other hazardous materials will be kept on paved roads or a distance of at least 50 feet from the shoreline.

The construction site shall maintain good construction site housekeeping controls and procedures (e.g., clean up all leaks, drips, and other spills immediately; keep materials covered and out of the rain (including covering exposed piles of soil and wastes); dispose of all wastes properly, place trash receptacles on site for that purpose, cover open trash receptacles during wet weather, remove any construction debris from the beach).

All areas of beach disturbed by construction activities shall be restored to their original pre-construction condition. Upon completion of construction, the access route and staging area shall be restored to their original condition.

At all times during project construction activities, copies of each of the following shall be maintained in a conspicuous location at the construction job site (where such copies shall be available for public review) and all persons involved with the construction shall be briefed on the content and meaning of each prior to commencement of construction: (a) the signed coastal development permit; (b) the approved final plans; and (c) the approved construction management plan.

MARINE PROTECTION
To prevent any impacts upon the marine habitat, no overburden or wet cement may be allowed to adversely impact the beach or enter the tidal zone. Under no circumstances shall use of equipment be allowed seaward of the mean high tide line when seawater is present.

Any areas of loose or unstable soil must be stabilized immediately after other portions of the project are finished. Any heavy equipment operation must be conducted with care near any bluff edges to prevent the destabilization of the substrate and additional erosion. Care must be taken so coastal bluffs outside the work area are not damaged during construction.

CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR
Contractor shall provide a construction coordinator that can be contacted during construction, should questions arise during construction (in case of both regular inquiries and in emergencies). Their contact information (including their address and 24 hour phone numbers) shall be conspicuously posted at the job site in a manner so that the contact information is readily visible from public viewing areas. The posting shall indicate that the construction coordinator should be contacted to answer questions that arise during construction (in case of both regular inquiries and in emergencies). The construction coordinator shall record the name, phone number, nature of all complaints (if any) received during construction, and shall investigate complaints and take remedial action, if necessary, within 24 hours of receipt of the complaint or inquiry.

BEST MANAGEMENT PLAN PROVISIONS
Appropriate protocols shall be implemented to manage all construction-phase Best Management Practices (including installation and removal, ongoing operation, inspection, maintenance, and training), to protect coastal water quality. The Contractor shall provide the SWPPP for the project. Additional Best Management Practices shall include the following:

Best Management Practices:

A. Minimize Erosion and Sediment Discharge. During construction, erosion and the discharge of sediment off-site or into coastal waters shall be minimized through the use of appropriate Best Management Practices including:

1. Land disturbance during construction (e.g., clearing, grading, and cut-and-fill) shall be minimized, and grading activities shall be phased, to avoid increased erosion and sedimentation.

2. Erosion Control Best Management Practices (such as mulch, soil binders, geotextile blankets or mats, or temporary seeding) shall be installed as needed to prevent soil from being transported by water or wind. Temporary Best Management Practices shall be implemented to stabilize soil on graded or disturbed areas as soon as feasible during construction, where there is a potential for soil erosion to lead to discharge of sediment off-site or to coastal waters. This should be done where staging, access, and construction activities occur.

3. Sediment Control Best Management Practices (such as silt fences, fiber rolls, sediment basins, inlet protection, sand bag barriers, or straw bale barriers) shall be installed as needed to trap and remove eroded sediment from runoff, to prevent sedimentation of coastal waters. This should be done where staging, access, and construction activities occur.

B. Minimize Discharge of Construction Pollutants. The discharge of other pollutants resulting from construction activities (such as chemicals, paints, vehicle fluids, petroleum products, asphalt and cement compounds, debris, and trash) into runoff or coastal waters shall be minimized through the use of appropriate Best Management Practices, including:

1. Materials Management and Waste Management Best Management Practices (such as stockpile management, spill prevention, and good housekeeping practices) shall be installed or implemented as needed to minimize pollutant discharge and polluted runoff resulting from staging, storage, and disposal of construction chemicals and materials. Best Management Practices shall include, at a minimum:
a) Covering stockpiled construction materials, soil, and other excavated materials to prevent contact with rain, and protecting all stockpiles from stormwater runoff using temporary perimeter barriers. b) Cleaning up all leaks, drips, and spills immediately; having a written plan for the clean-up of spills and leaks; and maintaining an inventory of products and chemicals used on site.
c) Proper disposal of all wastes; providing trash receptacles on site; and covering open trash receptacles during wet weather. d) Prompt removal of all construction debris from the beach. e) Detaining, infiltrating, or treating runoff, if needed, prior to conveyance off-site during construction.

2. Fueling and maintenance of construction equipment and vehicles shall be conducted off site if feasible. Any fueling and maintenance of mobile equipment conducted on site shall not take place on the beach, and shall take place at a designated area located at least 50 feet from coastal waters, drainage courses, and storm drain inlets, if feasible (unless those inlets are blocked to protect against fuel spills). The fueling and maintenance area shall be designed to fully contain any spills of fuel, oil, or other contaminants.

Equipment that cannot be feasibly relocated to a designated fueling and maintenance area (such as cranes) may be fueled and maintained in other areas of the site, provided that procedures are implemented to fully contain any potential spills, such as fueling the equipment with an impermeable visqueen catchment apron designed to capture any possible spills.

C. Minimize Other Impacts of Construction Activities. Other impacts of construction activities shall be minimized through the use of appropriate Best Management Practices, including:

1. The damage or removal of non-invasive vegetation (including trees, native vegetation, and root structures) during construction shall be minimized, to achieve water quality benefits such as transpiration, vegetative interception, pollutant uptake, shading of waterways, and erosion control.

2. Soil compaction due to construction activities shall be minimized, to retain the natural stormwater infiltration capacity of the soil.

3. The use of temporary erosion and sediment control products (such as fiber rolls, erosion control blankets, mulch control netting, and silt fences) that incorporate plastic netting (such as polypropylene, nylon, polyethylene, polyester, or other synthetic fibers) shall be avoided, to minimize wildlife entanglement and plastic debris pollution.

D. Minimize Impact of Construction In, Over, or Adjacent to Coastal Waters and Habitat. Construction shall protect the coastal waters and habitat by implementing Best Management Practices, including:

1. No construction equipment or materials (including debris) shall be allowed at any time within the tidelands when ocean water is present there.

2. Construction activity shall not be conducted seaward of the Mean High Tide Line, unless tidal waters have receded, and the area is part of the authorized work area.

3. All work shall take place during daylight hours, and lighting of the beach and ocean area is prohibited.

4. All construction equipment and materials placed on the beach during daylight construction hours shall be stored beyond the reach of tidal waters.

5. Tarps or other devices shall be used to capture debris, dust, oil, grease, rust, dirt, fine particles, and spills to protect the quality of coastal waters.

6. All erosion and sediment controls shall be in place prior to the commencement of construction, as well as at the end of each workday. At a minimum, if grading is taking place, sediment control Best Management Practices shall be installed at the perimeter of the construction site to prevent construction-related sediment and debris from entering the ocean, waterways, natural drainage swales, and the storm drain system, or being deposited on the beach. Natural beach sand, cobbles, and bedrock materials shall not be removed from the beach.

7. Only rubber-tired construction vehicles shall be allowed on the beach; the only exception shall be that tracked vehicles may be used if the Executive Director agrees that they are required to safely carry out construction. When transiting on the beach, all construction vehicles shall remain as high on the upper beach as possible and shall avoid contact with ocean waters and intertidal areas.

8. All shotcrete and construction material debris resulting from construction activities shall be removed from the beach at the end of each workday. AS SHOWN LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS 11897
PGCC 6-7-2023

Date
Scale
Job
Drawn
MF
Sheet 14
REVISIONS BY HARO, KASUNICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL, GEOTECHNICAL & COASTAL ENGINEERS 116 EAST LAKE AVENUE WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 (831) 722-4175 SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES 03-13-2023
OF 14 SHEETS
AS SHOWN LOVERS POINT PIER INTERIM REPAIR CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE LOVERS POINT PARK APN 006-155-099, OCEAN VIEW BLVD., PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 100% PLANS 11897
PGCC 6-7-2023

City Council
City of Pacific Grove
Lovers Point Pier Repair
Project
May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 1 PGCC 6-7-2023

1. Receive Report

2. Provide staff with direction on pursuing the
interim repair design solution

3. Alternatively, discuss and take other action
related to this item
May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 2 PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 3 •January 2021-seaward tip of the Pier was damaged by wave runup & wave impact forces during storms.•Geotechnical/coastal engineering firm consulted to provide repair recommendations. •Minimal info on the existing pier structure available  additional exploration needed prior to developing repair recommendations. •The tip of the pier was closed to ensure safety and will remain closed until repairs can be made.

PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 4 •$100,000 was budgeted for the Lovers Point Pier Project via FY21/22 CIP. •December 2021, Council authorized an agreement with GHD ($99,852) •Scope of services includes pier investigation, conditions assessment report, interim repair design, & grant support PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 5 Improvements made in1980’s; construction of
concrete walls & fascia; created shell around the
pier & lower dock
1909 cement pier further extended. Two 25-30’ tall
concrete monoliths tipped off the pier, covered
w/granite rock & cement. Wooden wharf extensions
also created
Before 1907, a cement pier was constructed,
replacing a wooden wharf
Circa 1900 there was a granite quarry which
enlarged the cove were the beach exists today
Pier investigation began with a review of historical documentation PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 6 •Internal structures of the pier assessed by boreholes & core samplings •Allowed for review of the composition & strength of structure •Wave runup analysis, riprap revetement size analysis & visual inspections also performed Additional details and information can be found in the Pier Condition Assessment included as Attachment 1.

PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 7  Primarily a gravity structure;
not column supported or reliant on strength of concrete beams; founded on natural ridge of granite bedrock  Comprised of interbedded
layers of concrete, a matrix of concrete bonded to rip rap and rip rap rock  Voids/joints exists
within/between the interbedded layers
 Some concrete is weak, other
segments are strong.
 1980’s reno encased weaker
concrete & rip rap; Reinforced concrete walls & slabs provide protective layer for the weaker legacy material  Reinforced concrete used iron &
carbon rebar; corroded and expanded resulting in severe concrete cracks & spalling, further exposing rebar.  Rebar supporting concrete walls
severely corroded at east end (upper deck). Panel of concrete dislodged & feel into the ocean during wave events.

PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 8  The pier has performed as
expected based on its construction
 The gravity structure is not in
danger of a catastrophic failure at this time
 As the reinforced concrete walls
continue to fail, exposing more of the vulnerable core of the gravity structure, the rate of deterioration will accelerate If nothing is done to reinforce and stabilize the core of the structure, the damage will get worse in the coming decade.

If the pier & rock jetty were to cease to exist – the sediment flow & accumulation patterns in the vicinity of the pier would be altered to the detriment of public access/recreational beach usage – the beach would be adversely affected, directly impacting public beach usage.

PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 9  As an element of
the scope of work, GHD prepared an interim repair option & plans set  Interim repair
solution will address identified deficiencies & improve & enhance safety of pier structure.

Interim Repair Design included as Attachment 2.

PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 10 Engineer's estimate for the interim repair is $1.35 million.

Interim repair is anticipated to last upwards of 20 years. • Install reinforced shotcrete fascia on
existing pier wall face.
• will act as a structural element & a
cosmetic surface that matches adjacent concrete
• Replace concrete at edges & top of pier
w/sound concrete edge
• Replace concrete footings & guard rail on
pier perimeter
• Demolish a 7” segment of the existing slab;
pour new 7” thick monolithic slab on the seaward 75 feet of the upper deck • Replace concrete slab on entire lower pier
deck
• Reform & resurface lower staircase that
extends into water from the lower pier deck

SCOPE OF WORK
PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 11 Feasibility study & deeper analysis of the long-term alternatives & detailed coastal engineering would be required if the Council wants to pursue long-term options High-level analysis of long-term repair alternatives explored. Intention to conceptually understand methods by which a long-term repair solution could be achieved & potential drawbacks

1. Total removal of the pier & rip-rap revetment & construction of a new wharf supported by deep foundations

2. Total removal of the pier & rip-rap revetment and construction of a new concrete gravity structure supported directly upon the granite bedrock formation that makes up the sea floor

3. Removal of existing concrete pier gravity structures above 0.0 feet NAVD88 & construction of new pier atop old concrete foundation elements and riprap.

4. Total removal of the pier & rip-rap revetment; construction of a rip-rap jetty in the same footprint with adequately sized rock to an approximate elevation of +20.0 feet NAVD88. Construct a concrete gravity structure atop the rip-rap jetty as a causeway for recreational access • This alternative is preferred from a constructability, environmental impact & longterm protection standpoint PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 12

GRANT SUPPORT
• GHD actively researching grant
opportunities for the interim repair
• Availability of grants is time
dependent (grants have specific periods for submittal)
• If Council interest in interim repair
exists, a deeper dive into grant funding will take place • Staff can return with updates &
options for funding interim repair

PERMITTING
• Project will require permits from the
California Coastal Commission (CCC)
• Interim repair discussed at a highlevel with CCC staff; begin dialogue in advance of formal application
• Formal permit app will be submitted
if Council expresses interest in pursuing the interim repair PGCC 6-7-2023

City Council
City of Pacific Grove
Questions?
May 17, 2023 Joyce Halabi, [email protected] 13 PGCC 6-7-2023

Agenda No. 12 C

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Gho, Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager MEETING DATE: June 07, 2023
SUBJECT: Local Water Project Operations and Maintenance Contract This item was continued from Council's May 17, 2023 meeting.

CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize an amendment to the Asset Management Agreement with PERC Water for the Operations & Maintenance of the Pacific Grove Local Water Project for a 5-year term (November 1, 2023 –October 31, 2028) at a monthly fixed cost of $32,896 and a variable cost of $247.24 per acre foot of influent flow to the plant.

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item

DISCUSSION
PERC Water Corporation (PERC) was founded in January 1998 as an entity that provides services from initial design through construction of wastewater treatment and recycling facilities, and long-term operations for wastewater and recycling projects. In August 2015, the City entered into an agreement with PERC for the final design and construction of the Local Water Project (LWP). In November 2017, the City entered into an Asset Management Services Agreement with PERC for the operations and maintenance of the LWP for a term of 5 years.

The term of the original agreement expired on October 31, 2022. Section 2, “Term,” of the agreement specifies that 9 months before the expiration of the operations period, PERC and the City will meet to discuss, in good faith, an extension upon the same terms and conditions of the Asset Management Services Agreement with such revisions as mutually agreed to by both parties.

In March 2022, City staff was approached by PERC and discussions began. The City requested PERC review their current operations and costs, as well as assess any operational efficiencies that could be implemented to decrease costs. Multiple discussion occurred with PERC. During these discussions, PERC shared those operational expenditures had risen due to significant increases in costs associated with the process chemicals, labor, fuel, monitoring and sampling, and operational facets.

At their October 19, 2022 meeting, the City Council authorized staff to enter into a one-year extension to the original O&M agreement with PERC. This one-year extension allowed City staff to continue negotiations with PERC with the expectation that a new proposals would be brought forth to the Council PGCC 6-7-2023

for consideration by May of 2023. This provided 6 months to discuss new terms with PERC. This also provided staff with 6 months to proceed through the RFQ process and solidify a new agreement with a vendor if consensus could not be met with PERC.

City staff discussed operations of the LWP with PERC and received a proposal that is acceptable to bring forward to the City Council for consideration (Attachment 1).

The proposal has two options for Council consideration:

Options 1. The first option has a fixed monthly fee of $32,896, with a variable fee of $247.24 per acre foot, that is based on inflow water. This option is identical to the scope PERC currently provides but has an increase of $80,496 annually to cover rising expenses associated with insurances, staffing, fuel, and other various expenses associated with plant operations. In this option PERC provides day-to-day operation and management of the facility with 24-hour monitoring, as well as payment for all the consumables, internet and certified lab services. The City will continue to be responsible for the cost of replacement and repair parts.

Option 2. In the second option, PERC will provide all day-to-day operation and management of the facility with 24-hour monitoring. PERC has removed from their scope the cost of consumables and outside services such as certified lab for sample analysis, process chemicals and Internet service. In this scenario, these items would be directly billed to the City, avoiding a markup and contingency. All other services remain included in this option. The monthly fixed fee for this option is $30,726. It is anticipated that the cost of the consumables will be $79,000 per year.

Fees Current Option1 Option2
Monthly Service
fee $26,188.00 $32,896.00 $30,726.00
Variable Unit Fee $247.24 $247.24* $79,000**
Annual Cost $338,905.82 $422,937.36 $447,712.00
*This cost estimate is based on the 2022 figure of 114 acre feet sold. **estimated cost to for consumables that City will be billed directly for (also based on assumption of 114 acre feet sold)
The LWP requires that the operations have a Grade IV Wastewater Certified Operator to oversee the plant. PERC has the qualifications, knowledge, necessary skills, insurances, and workforce to continue operations of the LWP, the City does not have this level of expertise.

Staff is recommending the Council proceed with Option 1. It is the most cost-effective solution and will provide the City with a consistent high level of service to current day operations.

Option 2 is not advised because it is anticipated to be more costly with the cost of consumables.

Moreover, this option does not account for added administration that would be transferred to City staff, associated with management of the consumables (invoicing, contract administrations, etc).

If approved, staff will enter into an amendment to the original Asset Management Agreement with PERC executed in November 2017 (Attachment 2) updating the terms and fee schedules.

OPTIONS
PGCC 6-7-2023

OPTIONS
Do nothing. This is not recommended as we will not have an operator for the Local Water Project and the plant will not be able to produce irrigation water for the golf course, cemetery, and lighthouse grounds after the one-year term has expired.

1. Authorize staff to release a Request for Qualifications. This option is not advised as it is anticipated that proposal costs will be higher than the options provided through negotiations with PERC.

2. FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Staff will be proposing $400,000 through the FY 23/24 Budget process to allow for the operations of the Local Water Project. This proposed funding will allow for 4 months under the current agreement terms, expiring October 31, 2023, and the remaining 8 months for the newly proposed fees (option 1).

Funds have been budgeted based on Option 1 for the new agreement utilizing 114-acre feet as the base line for the variable fee.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Infrastructure
Attachments
Staff PPT
Amendment Proposal
Asset Management Agreement
PGCC 6-7-2023

City Council
City of Pacific Grove
Perc Water Amendment
Operations LWP
May 17, 2023 [email protected] 1 PGCC 6-7-2023

 City has agreement with Perc Water for operations
 5-year agreement commenced in January of 2018 Original agreement expired on October 31, 2022 Council Authorized a one year extension October 19, 2022 Current extension expires October 31, 2023 Staff specified we would return to Council within 6 months Allows time for RFP if necessary May 17, 2023 [email protected] 2
PGCC 6-7-2023

May 17, 2023 [email protected] 3
**This cost estimate is based on the 2022 figure of 114 acre feet sold.**estimated cost to for consumables that City will be billed directly for (also based on assumption of 114 acre feet sold
Fees Current Option 1 Option 2
Monthly $26,188.00 $32,896.00 $30,726.00
Service
Fee
Variable $247.24 $247.24* $79,000**
Unit Fee
Annual $338,905.82 $422,937.36 $447,712.00
Cost
PGCC 6-7-2023

1. Authorize an amendment to the Asset Management
Agreement with PERC Water for the Operations & Maintenance of the Pacific Grove Local Water Project for a 5-year term (November 1, 2023 –October 31, 2028) at a monthly fixed cost of $32,896 and a variable cost of $247.24 per acre foot of influent flow to the plant.2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item May 17, 2023 [email protected]
4 PGCC 6-7-2023

City Council
City of Pacific Grove
Questions?
May 17, 2023 [email protected] 5
PGCC 6-7-2023

17520 Newhope Street, Suite 180 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 | Office: 714.352.7750 | Fax: 714.352.7765 | www.percwater.com May 2, 2023
Mr. Daniel Gho, Public Works Director
City of Pacific Grove
300 Forest Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
PERC Water Corporation (PERC Water) is pleased to provide this proposal to the City of Pacific Grove (City) to extend the current contract for the Operation Services of the Local Water Project.

PERC Water has provided operation and maintenance of the facility since startup completion in 2017. The Initial contract included a term of five years (2017 to 2022) and was extended in October 2022 for an additional 1-year period (Nov. 1, 2022 to Oct. 30, 2023). The extended period is approaching its expiration. Accordingly, we have initiated conversations with City staff to discuss a contract extension.

We have reviewed the current cost of operation in an effort to identify cost saving efficiencies. The fee for the scope of service we provide is largely based on the cost of labor, and in the current labor market, the cost of qualified operators has significantly increased. The second greatest cost factor for the facility operation is process chemical addition. The influent flow to the facility contains an abnormally high concentration of tannins. The tannins cause a decrease in UV transmissivity resulting in the inability to adequately disinfect the treated effluent. The treatment for high tannins is to dose aluminum sulfate to the influent flow. Utilizing aluminum sulfate was not anticipated during the original design and operation and has significantly increased our cost to operate.

Proposal Options
In the proposal to follow, we have provided two options for this service. The first option is a service offering identical to the scope we currently provide. In this option we provide day-to-day operation and management of the facility with 24-hour monitoring, as well as payment for all the consumables and certified lab services. The City will continue to be responsible for the cost of replacement and repair parts.

In the second option we also provide day-to-day operation and management of the facility with 24-hour monitoring. We have removed from our scope the cost of consumables and outside services such as certified lab for sample analysis, process chemicals and Internet service. These items can be direct billed to the City, avoiding our markup and contingency, thus reducing overall cost to the City. All other services remain included in this option.

Contract Term
To provide operational continuity and uninterrupted service, we propose a five-year (5) term for this new service agreement. A five-year term also helps us provide a meaningful commitment to our onsite staff as we recruit the professionals we need to operate and maintain the facility. This proposed term also allows us to look at the facility maintenance and capital improvements on a long-term basis for forward planning and budgeting.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove Public Works May 2, 2023
Local Water Project O&M Page 2 of 7
Scope of Service
Proposal Option #1
PERC Water will operate the Local Water Project per the Scope of Services as detailed below, including staffing the facility as needed to provide uninterrupted service. • Operate, maintain and or remotely monitor the facility seven days per week, 24 hours per day. • Respond to alarms and callouts seven days per week, 24 hours per day with no more than 60- minute onsite response time if necessary.
• Communicate effectively with recycled water users at the Pacific Grove Golf Links and City staff. • Coordinate recycled water production and distribution with recycled water users • Provide certified operators as required by regulatory requirements. • Provide sample collection and analysis for in-house process control. • Provide sample collection and transportation to Certified Lab for sample analysis for regulatory reporting. The lab fees are included Option #1 PERC’s pricing. o PERC Water will be using Monterey Bay Analytical Services for compliance sample analysis.
• Provide proper screening management and disposal.
• Provide internet service for operations staff and remote access • Manage Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) operations in compliance with Regional Water Pollution Control Agency (MRWPCA) requirements.
• Maintain Emergency Response Plan (ERP) Contingency Plan to address spills overflows and system failures annually.
o Provide copies of all plans to the City of Pacific Grove Public Works Department. • Prepare and maintain site specific safety plan and adhere to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements.
o Adopt and implement an OSHA Compliance Plan.
• Purchase and manage the usage of chemicals required for the operation of the facility and the cleaning of the membranes.
• Maintain site security, including security alarms, entrance gates and proper signage. • Maintain facility access for City personnel and Public Works Staff. o Provide keys to the facility and security alarm codes as required. • Maintain, update and store accessibly the Facility O&M Manual, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), site-specific log book, design plans, permits and all other documents specific to the facility including PERC Water’s Contract Operator Certification issued by the Office of Operator Certification.
• Operate the WRF in conformance with the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) recommendations and maintain the equipment warranties to maximize equipment life cycle. • Provide a Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS) program for all preventive, predictive and corrective maintenance for all facility equipment and structures. o PERC Water currently uses a computerized software program called e-Maint, a cloud based software product designed for Wastewater Utilities. • Perform PMs per OEM recommendations to maximize the life cycle of all facility equipment. • Participate in annual budget process providing input for annual maintenance costs, repair, replacements, and capital improvements.
• Provide “out of scope” tasks as mutually agreed.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove Public Works May 2, 2023
Local Water Project O&M Page 3 of 7
o Cost based on actual equipment material and sub-contractor costs, Operator standard hourly rate and a maximum 10% administrative fee.
• Provide work orders per OEM recommendations and perform adequate operation and monitoring.
• Track all CMMS work orders and percent complete with a summary report to be included in the monthly report of operations.
• At all times keep the facility clean, neat and safe by removal and disposal of trash and debris including parking areas and perimeter fencing.

Monitoring, Reporting and Compliance
• Remote monitoring of critical alarms and processes (Operator in Charge, Chief Operator and Division VP).
• Provide a monthly report of operation to be presented to the City of Pacific Grove at a monthly in-person meeting and presented to City Council if desired. The Monthly report of operations shall include at a minimum:
o A detailed narrative summarizing the O&M activities that took place during the month. o All equipment repairs and preventive maintenance tasks. o Water quality data for the month and for the preceding twelve months for comparison purposes. Identify any constituents of regulatory concern and discussion of a plan of action to respond to the concerns.
o Monthly discharge schedules (Golf Course, Cemetery etc.). o Monthly power consumption and rolling twelve-month comparison o Waste Activated Sludge discharged to MRWPCA including concentration and any other requirements of MRWPCA. Provide a rolling twelve-month comparison. o Visitor log and safety and security report.
o Facility maintenance summary.
o Work orders issued, completed, and remaining open.
o Equipment out of service.
o Reclaimed water production and irrigation use.
o Reclaimed water used by trucks.
o Status of all capital improvements, maintenance and repairs performed or coordinated during the month.
• Prepare and submit monthly and annual regulatory reports in accordance with the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) and Monitoring and Reporting Plan. Meet all reporting and monitoring requirements of the Central Coast Region Water Quality Control Board. Upload reports top Geotracker as required.
• Provide alarm monitoring and response as needed with no more than 60 minute response time. • Maintain monthly log of operation maintenance and laboratory analysis. • Maintain monthly odor complaints and callout response log. • Provide any additional reports required by law.
• Upon request provide reports for process operations and effluent water production. • Facilitate annual flow meter calibration by certified technician in accordance with regulatory requirements. Cost for service to be paid by City.
• Provide an annual comprehensive assessment of facility equipment condition, projected life expectancy and estimated replacement cost of key equipment and components of each system.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove Public Works May 2, 2023
Local Water Project O&M Page 4 of 7
Miscellaneous
• Remove and dispose of all trash and debris on the site including parking lots. • Coordinate with City Staff to open, maintain and operate the recycled water storage and pickup station for commercial customers. PERC Water staff will check permits and licenses to ensure proper operation and monitoring of recycled water station and maintain all required records of recycled water distribution.

Proposal Option #2
PERC Water will operate the Local Water Project per the Scope of Services as detailed below, including staffing the facility as needed to provide uninterrupted service. • Operate, maintain and or remotely monitor the facility seven days per week, 24 hours per day. • Respond to alarms and callouts seven days per week, 24 hours per day with no more than 60- minute onsite response time if necessary.
• Communicate effectively with recycled water users at the Pacific Grove Golf Links and City staff. • Coordinate recycled water production and distribution with recycled water users • Provide certified operators as required by regulatory requirements. • Provide sample collection and analysis for in-house process control. • Provide sample collection for Certified Lab for sample analysis for regulatory reporting. o City to receive direct bill from lab.
• Provide proper screening management and disposal.
• Manage Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) operations in compliance with Regional Water Pollution Control Agency (MRWPCA) requirements.
• Maintain Emergency Response Plan (ERP) Contingency Plan to address spills overflows and system failures annually.
o Provide copies of all plans to the City of Pacific Grove Public Works Department. • Prepare and maintain site specific safety plan and adhere to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements.
o Adopt and implement an OSHA Compliance Plan.
• Develop and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the operation of the facility which will comply with all regulatory requirements.
• Order and receive delivery of process chemicals with City get direct bill from suppliers • Maintain site security, including security alarms, entrance gates and proper signage. • Maintain facility access for City personnel and Public Works Staff. o Provide keys to the facility and security alarm codes as required. • Maintain, update and store accessibly the Facility O&M Manual, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), site-specific log book, design plans, permits and all other documents specific to the facility including PERC Water’s Contract Operator Certification issued by the Office of Operator Certification.
• Operate the WRF in conformance with the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) recommendations and maintain the equipment warranties to maximize equipment life cycle. • Provide a Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS) program for all preventive, predictive and corrective maintenance for all facility equipment and structures. o PERC Water currently uses a computerized software program called e-Maint, a cloud based software product designed for Wastewater Utilities.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove Public Works May 2, 2023
Local Water Project O&M Page 5 of 7
o We will provide access to the system for one designated City employee for transparency purposes.
• Perform PMs per OEM recommendations to maximize the life cycle of all facility equipment. o PM costs are included in the Service Fee.
• Participate in annual budget process providing input for annual maintenance costs, repair, replacements, and capital improvements.
• Provide “out of scope” tasks as mutually agreed.
o Cost based on actual equipment material and sub-contractor costs, Operator standard hourly rate and a maximum 10% administrative fee.
• Develop and maintain an all-inclusive asset inventory. • Provide work orders per OEM recommendations and perform adequate operation and monitoring.
• Track all CMMS work orders and percent complete with a summary report to be included in the monthly report of operations.
• Work orders shall also be completed for buildings and hardscapes. • At all times keep the facility clean, neat and safe by removal and disposal of trash and debris including parking areas and perimeter fencing.

Monitoring, Reporting and Compliance
• Remote monitoring of critical alarms and processes (Operator in Charge, Chief Operator and Division VP).
• Provide and maintain a laboratory quality assurance program as well as a laboratory manual including standard operating procedures.
• Provide a monthly report of operation to be presented to the City of Pacific Grove at a monthly in-person meeting and presented to City Council if desired. The Monthly report of operations shall include at a minimum:
o A detailed narrative summarizing the O&M activities that took place during the month. o All equipment repairs and preventive maintenance tasks. o Water quality data for the month and for the preceding twelve months for comparison purposes. Identify any constituents of regulatory concern and discussion of a plan of action to respond to the concerns.
o Monthly discharge schedules (Golf Course, Cemetery etc.). o Monthly power consumption and rolling twelve-month comparison o Waste Activated Sludge discharged to MRWPCA including concentration and any other requirements of MRWPCA. Provide a rolling twelve-month comparison. o Visitor log and safety and security report.
o Facility maintenance summary.
o Work orders issued, completed, and remaining open.
o Equipment out of service.
o Reclaimed water production and irrigation use.
o Reclaimed water used by trucks.
o Status of all capital improvements, maintenance and repairs performed or coordinated during the month.
• Prepare and submit monthly and annual regulatory reports in accordance with the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) and Monitoring and Reporting Plan. Meet all reporting and monitoring requirements of the Central Coast Region Water Quality Control Board. Upload reports top Geotracker as required.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove Public Works May 2, 2023
Local Water Project O&M Page 6 of 7
• Comply with all monitoring requirements of the Air Pollution Control District. • Provide alarm monitoring and response as needed with no more than 30 minute response time. • Maintain monthly log of operation maintenance and laboratory analysis. • Maintain monthly odor complaints and callout response log. • Provide any additional reports required by law.
• Upon request provide any report required by City.
• Provide calibration of all monitoring equipment annually at a minimum and accordance with all regulatory requirements.
• Provide verification of accuracy and calibration of analytic monitoring equipment in accordance with EPA State and Laboratory QA/QC Program.

Provide an annual comprehensive assessment of facility equipment condition, projected life expectancy and estimated replacement cost of key equipment and components of each system Miscellaneous
• Remove and dispose of all trash and debris on the site including parking lots. • Coordinate with City Staff to open, maintain and operate the recycled water storage and pickup station for commercial customers. PERC Water staff will check permits and licenses to ensure proper operation and monitoring of recycled water station and maintain all required records of recycled water distribution.

Project Needs
During the extended term, PERC Water will work in partnership with the City to evaluate the possibility and cost of increasing production to enhance the revenue stream generated by sale of reuse effluent. We have outlined a few examples below.

Membrane System Capacity
During recent communication with Koch Membrane Systems (KMS), it was confirmed the Facility’s membrane modules have an additional 25% capacity (75,000 GPD) as the existing system can accommodate the installation of additional membranes. This option will allow the facility to produce more reuse water for sale to increase the City’s revenue stream. The increased cost to produce this additional reuse water would be nominal and would not require any additional labor.

Chemical Dosing System Upgrade
The original design of the facility did not accommodate for the addition of aluminum sulfate as described above. We have temporarily modified the facility to dose aluminum sulfate, and while this temporary approach has worked to date, we need to provide a permanent installation. The permanent system will include two small pumps and a dosing system that is flow paced to facilitate an effective and efficient treatment process.

Spare Parts Inventory
PERC Water will work with City staff to create a comprehensive spare parts inventory. The spare parts will include instruments and mechanical parts (UV bulbs, sleeves and miscellaneous parts and instruments).

A proper spare parts inventory will minimize equipment downtime and water production interruption.

Fee and Compensation
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove Public Works May 2, 2023
Local Water Project O&M Page 7 of 7
Service Option #1
Monthly Fixed Fee 32,896
Monthly Variable Fee $5,769*
Total Monthly $38,665
Flow Based Variable Unit Price $247.24 per Acre Foot
• Price based on full flow (250,000 GPD)
Service Option #2
Monthly Fixed Fee 30,726
Variable cost paid by City through direct bill by vendors Thank you for providing PERC Water with the opportunity to continue providing our O&M services to the City of Pacific Grove. We look forward to having the opportunity to work in partnership with you and your staff.

Sincerely,
PERC Water Corporation
Robert Nespeca, Vice President
PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

PGCC 6-7-2023

Agenda No. 12 D

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Gho, Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager MEETING DATE: June 07, 2023
SUBJECT: Agreement with Bowman for the Design and Environmental for Replacement of Pump Station 15.5 This item was continued from Council's May 17, 2023 meeting.

CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize an agreement with Bowman for the Design and Environmental for Replacement of Pump Station 15.5 in an amount not to exceed $109,174.

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

DISCUSSION
The City owns seven (7) lift stations located throughout the collection system, and Monterey One Water (M1W) owns two (2) lift stations at the downstream end of the City’s collection system. The City contracts with M1W to maintain all nine (9) of the lift stations.

Pump Station 15.5 is a submersible wet well lift station located off Ocean View Boulevard that is used for the Crespi Pond bathroom. Crespi Pond bathroom is located adjacent to the Pacific Grove golf course’s 17th hole. The lift station discharges through a 4-inch diameter ductile iron force main to manhole #982 at the intersection of Ocean View Boulevard and Asilomar Avenue.

In 2021, the City performed a Pump Station Master Plan to assess the conditions and operations of the lift stations. The full Pump Station Master Plan document is available on the City’s Sewer Collection System page.

The Pump Station Master Plan revealed that Pump Station 15.5, the smallest of the City’s lift stations, is in the worst condition of all 7 lift stations and is in need of replacement. At the time of the assessment, both pump motors at pump station 15.5 had very low megohm readings, which indicate the pumps should be replaced. There is no coating in the wet well and there is no valve vault. The ductile iron check valve and isolation valves are located inside the wet well. Due to the deleterious condition of the piping and valves, operations staff requested that the pumps not be removed for inspection. Electrical conduits were not sealed off from the lift station, possibly allowing corrosive and volatile gases to be introduced. The recommendation is to replace the lift station or install a septic tank. The City requires connections to our sanitary sewer system so a septic tank is not an option.

PGCC 6-7-2023

On January 23, 2023, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the Design, Environmental and Permitting of Pump Station 15.5 Replacement. On February 23, 2023, the RFQ period closed.

Two statements of qualifications were received:

Firm Proposal
Bowman $109,174*
Wallace Group $146,933.08
*The original Bowman proposal submitted was $118,774. The City was able to negotiate with Bown to omit permitting from the scope of services for the consultant. City staff will prepare the necessary permit applications through the City’s local coastal program once final design and environmental documents have been prepared.

Bowman is well qualified to perform this scope of work and the proposal is within the $110,000 project budget. As such, Staff recommends authorizing an agreement with Bowman, in an amount not to exceed $109,174, for the Design and Environmental for the Pump Station 15.5 Replacement project.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of work for this agreement includes all labor and materials required to provide design/engineering, environmental, and permitting for replacement of Pump Station 15.5. This includes, but is not limited to:

PROJECT MANAGEMENT
• Oversight and project management through the duration of the contract and services, including check-ins with City staff
DESIGN
• Preliminary Design
o The consultant shall work with the City to establish design criteria for the lift station including inward flow to the lift station, emergency storage response time, and various other technical specifications o The City will review the preliminary design materials and, with the consultant, develop a final set of specifications for final engineering design
• Final Design, including Plans, Specifics and Estimates o Including civil and electrical design drawings for bid and installation. These documents will be used for construction bidding purposes following environmental review/assessment, permitting and approvals.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & ASSESSMENT
• Based on final design, the selected consultant will perform and develop the necessary environmental review documents in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

PERMITTING
Please note that the scope of work in the agreement does not include permitting, as originally requested in the RFQ. Both proposals originally came in over the project budget and this item was omitted to get PGCC 6-7-2023

the project within the allocated budget.

Contract
If approved, the City’s standard professional services agreement (reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, Risk Management, and the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) will be prepared for the Mayor’s signature per the standard contracting process.

Timeline
It is anticipated that completion of design and environmental will take a significant portion of the FY23/24 Fiscal Year. Updates on the progress of the project will be provided on the City’s transparency platform, Clear Gov project pages. The link is available at www.cityofpg.org/finance

OPTIONS

1. Do nothing; This is not recommended as continued deterioration of the current pump station will continue; this could lead to a sanitary sewer overflow or the discontinued use of the Crespi Pond bathroom

2. Provide alternative direction
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
$110,000 was allocated to the Pump Station 15.5 Replacement Project through the FY22/23 Capital Improvement Program. This initial allocation for this multi-year project will allow for the engineering, design and permitting of the project. The project would return for an additional funding allocation, to allow for construction, in a subsequent year CIP following completion of this initial phase.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Infrastructure
Attachments
Staff PPT
PGCC 6-7-2023

City Council
City of Pacific Grove
Pump Station

15.5 Design and
Environmental
May 17, 2023 Daniel Gho [email protected] 1 PGCC 6-7-2023

 The City owns 7 Pump Stations ; There are 9 in the City  Stations Maintained by MOW In 2021 the City prepared a Pump Station Master Plan The plan identified Station 15.5, Crespi Pond bathroom, in the worst condition
 City issued RFQ for services on January 23, 2023
May 17, 2023 Daniel Gho [email protected] 2
PGCC 6-7-2023

 Design/Engineering: preliminary design for review, final design with plans, specs and engineers estimates
 Environmental Review: Based on Final plans and compliant with CEQA
 Permitting: Removed from scope for cost savings: City to obtain permit through our LCP
May 17, 2023 Daniel Gho [email protected] 3
PGCC 6-7-2023

Recommendation

1.Authorize an agreement with Bowman for the
Design and Environmental for Replacement of Pump Station 15.5 in an amount not to exceed $109,174.

2.Alternatively, discuss and take other action
related to this item.

May 17, 2023 Daniel Gho [email protected] 4
PGCC 6-7-2023

City Council
City of Pacific Grove
Questions?
May 17, 2023 Author and email address 5
PGCC 6-7-2023

Agenda No. 12 E

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joyce Halabi, Deputy Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: June 07, 2023
SUBJECT: FY22/23 CIP Potential Carry Forwards
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION

1. Received Report on FY22/23 CIP and projects to be carried forward to the FY23/24 CIP If the council desires to defund a project and reallocate funding, select from the “eligible projects”

2. 3. Alternatively, discuss and take other action

DISCUSSION
Before the start of each fiscal year, the City adopts an annual budget. There are two primary components to the City’s annual budget: the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the Operating Budget.

The CIP serves as a living document to drive the City’s larger maintenance and asset management needs; as a result, it may require amendments and updates throughout the year to reflect changes that arise during implementation.

The amended FY22/23 CIP includes 41 projects. Projects range from vital City facility repairs, road rehabilitation and maintenance activities, and pedestrian/safety improvements to commencing and/or continuing large-scale, multiyear projects.

Throughout the fiscal year, staff works diligently on executing the CIP. Successfully completing a project generally requires progression through the following project phases:

Project Development Phase. This starting phase for each new project requires staff to determine vital project details in anticipation of the RFP/bid phase. This often requires the development of specifications and/or construction drawings and plans.

1. RFP/Bid Phase. This phase requires solicitation and review of proposals/bids, as well as a selection of a consultant or contractor to provide the specific commodity or service within the parameters outlined in the Pacific Grove Municipal Code.

2. Contract Phase. The contract phase ensures the City has legally binding agreements with the entities performing work. This phase also requires City Council authorization of agreements over $40,000.

3. 4. Construction/Work in Progress. This phase of the project often includes street closures and PGCC 6-7-2023

ground disturbance to install new infrastructure and/or repair existing infrastructure. CIP projects are not solely limited to traditional construction projects, the City has several essential projects that are more inconspicuous. Examples include interior improvements to city facilities and preparation of environmental documents or plan sets for multiyear infrastructure projects. In the latter scenario, the first year of funding is often designated solely for design or environmental document preparation, and subsequent years for construction.

Once a project successfully navigates through these phases, it can be deemed complete. A project is deemed completed when the scope of work has been executed and the project is considered finished.

In rare instances, during execution at any of the above-noted steps, a project can be deemed infeasible.

Infeasible projects are labeled as deferred or deferred indefinitely depending on the degree of infeasibility as described below.

Deferred. This status applies to projects that were determined to be infeasible in the given fiscal year. Infeasibility can be determined by a variety of factors including time or budgetary constraints, conflicts, readiness, and additional information obtained during project development.

Projects in the deferred category have the potential to return to future CIPs.

Deferred Indefinitely. The status indicates the project has not been completed and has been deemed infeasible by staff. Infeasibility in this scenario is not contingent upon budgetary or time constraints, but rather due to general project impracticality. Projects in the deferred indefinitely category will not be recommended for funding by staff in any future CIP.

There are also several multi-year projects funded in the annual CIP. These are larger-scale projects where the scope of work and project phases occur over multiple fiscal years. These projects often require the preparation of plans and specifications, environmental documents/review, permitting, public feedback processes, etc. Recent examples of large-scale multi-year projects completed include: the Library Renewal Project, ASBS Wet-Dry Weather Capture and Diversion Project, and the Point Pinos Coastal Trail Project. The current CIP includes several multi-year projects where it was anticipated the projects would be carried forward to allow for continued progression; some of these projects include Crespi Pond Bathroom Replacement, Purple Pipe Project, Skate Park Project, etc.

Carry Forward Projects
As the Fiscal Year ends, City Staff reviews the existing projects and the progress made to date and determines which of the projects need to be carried forward to allow for completion. Given construction time constraints, weather, engineering, permitting and public input processes, projects may need to be carried forward to a subsequent fiscal year for completion.

Once a determination is made, projects are formally carried forward through a budget adjustment brought forth to the City Council, typically in the first quarter of the fiscal year.

FY22/23 CIP STATUS UPDATE
An overview of the status of the 41 projects it provided below. A full list of the projects, status, and notes is provided in Attachment 1.

Project Phase Number of Projects
Complete 14
Construction/Work in Progress 11
Contract 3
Bids/RFP 5
Project Development 7
PGCC 6-7-2023

Deferred Indefinetly 1

FY22/23 CARRY FORWARDS
Of the 41 projects, it is anticipated that 22 will be fully complete by the end of the Fiscal Year and 19 will be carried forward into the FY23/24 CIP.

Of the 19 being carried forward:
5 are in the Construction/Work in Progress Phase.

These projects are well underway and will be carried forward to allow for project completion
It is anticipated that most of the work and expenses will be incurred by the end of the 23/24 fiscal year.
4 are in the Bids/RFPs phase
An RFP for the backstop replacement project has been released (closing in June) An RFP for the George Washington Park Playground equipment has been released and results were brought forth to Recreation Board in April and subsequently City Council at a future meeting
An RFP for the City Hall Roof Repair is currently being drafted; anticipated to be released in June.

Staff is soliciting quotes for upgrades to the Mezzanine at the PG Museum of Natural History; City staff has actively worked with Museum Staff on an approach forward that will meet current standards while still meeting the needs and use of the space 2 are in the contract phase
Following a competitive bid process, the Pump Station Replacement Project, is being brought for authorization of an agreement (Continued from the May 17, 2023 Council Meeting to the June 7, 2023 Council Meeting)
Following a competitive RFP process, authorization of an agreement for phase I of the improvements to Cedar, Congress, and Sunset will be brought forward to Council on June 21, 2023
7 are in the project development phase. This phase allows for engineering and environmental document preparation to occur;
Several of these projects are multi-year projects where it was anticipated that elements of the project development phase would span the first fiscal year Project expenses may not accurately reflect the staff time invested into the project These projects include: Phase 9 (which is currently in Environmental Review), 1 project is deemed complete (Point Pinos Coastal Trail Project); remaining funds will be carried forward to allow for the second, and final, year of plant monitoring Of the 19 carry-forward projects, 8 are considered multi-year projects, meaning when they were approved it was anticipated that the scope of work and time estimated to complete the project would span more than one fiscal year.

Examples include the Skate Park, Purple Pipe, David Avenue Sidewalk, Phase 9 sewer main line replacement, and Crespi Pond Bathroom Replacement Projects.

In these instances, the scope of work is often broken out to allow for a subset of the work to be completed in the fiscal year and implementation/construction to be funded in a subsequent year

POTENTIAL REALLOCATION OF PROJECT FUNDS
At the May 17, 2023, meeting, the Council requested staff return with a list of projects anticipated to be carried forward; Council expressed interest in having the opportunity to review projects still in the PGCC 6-7-2023

early phases and consider defunding and/or reallocating funds to other projects/infrastructure needs.

City staff has reviewed the status of each of the projects anticipated to be carried forward. As noted above, there are 19 projects anticipated to be carried forward. Of the 19, staff has determined the following 5 eligible for potential defunding and reallocation, should the council desire to shift priorities:

Skate Park Project (CIP23-20)
This is an ARPA funded project with minimal funding expended to date Inability to obtain consensus on a location after a year of public outreach

1. Purple Pipe Project (CIP23-19)
This is a multi-year project
The project is also ARPA funded with an original project budget of $120,000 The project budget was amended down to $39,000 during the mid-year process to accurately reflect anticipated expenses in the current Fiscal Year (cost for the preparation of the feasibility study)
Full report will be brought back to the City Council at the 6/21 meeting Remaining $81,000 of the original project allocation can be reallocated to another project; if the council pursues this option, the incurred expenses will need to be absorbed by the general fund.

2. David Avenue Sidewalk (CIP 23-21)
This is a multi-year project with the first year dedicated to Project Development (engineering, public outreach, and input from the Council on a desired approach to pedestrian safety)
The project is ARPA funded with minimal expenses incurred to date expenses thus far will be limited to the development of preliminary conceptual options Conceptual options have been prepared by the City Engineering; options will be brought forth to the City Council in July
There is not sufficient funding to allow for the full construction of sidewalks; sidewalk installation could be achieved by phasing the project and installing segments of sidewalk year over year
Alternatively, the council can reallocate funding to another project

3. Recreation Board’s Park Inventory Project (CIP 23-22) Anticipated to have $20,000 of project savings
$20,000 can be reallocated to another project or staff can return to the Recreation Board to provide feedback on additional items from the inventory report that can be addressed with the remaining funds

4. Wig-Wag Lights at Robert Down Elementary (CIP 23-16) This is an ARPA funded project with a budget of $20,000; no funding has been expended This project is currently in a deferred status; This project, proposed by the Traffic Safety Commission, has been reviewed by the City’s traffic engineer. Wig-wag lights are not recommended for this location as they will not enhance safety due to too much going on at the existing intersection. The traffic engineer's recommendation is pavement marking improvements, which can be done in-house with public works crews This $20,000 is recommended to be allocated to another infrastructure project

5. The remaining 14 carry-forward projects have been deemed ineligible for reallocation, for the following reasons:

Grant funding. Four (4) projects are grant-funded, funding has been awarded for a specific purpose/project and/or the award is contingent upon the original project funding allocation to serve as matching funds.

This includes the Backstop Replacement at the Municipal Ball Field, George Washington Park ADA Compliant Playground Equipment, Cedar, Sunset & Congress Intersection PGCC 6-7-2023

Safety Improvements, and the Point Pinos Coastal Trail Project Reallocating the portion of funds will negate the City’s ability to provide the required grant matching funding and will not allow sufficient funding to allow for the project to proceed Several projects are funded via a specific non-general funding source that have strict parameters for eligible expenses (for example: Sewer Enterprise Fund, Museum Improvement Fund, Lighthouse Fund, RSTP Fund, Measure X, SB1/RMRA etc.).

Defunding these projects would only allow a reallocation of projects that meet the funding source parameters (ex: sewer fund for an alternate sewer fund project) ARPA funded projects that address much-needed infrastructure repairs that are either underway, a contract has been executed for the work, and/or work will be underway shortly; as a result, staff recommends continuing to fund these projects
These include the City Hall Roof Repair Project, Crespi Pond Bathroom Project, Fire Station Roof Repair, and the Chautauqua Hall Preservation Plan (currently in the contract phase)
Please reference attachment 1 for a full list of projects and additional details.

ARPA Funding Considerations
While considering the reallocation of ARPA funded projects, please note the ARPA funding considerations/limitations:

Studies are not eligible for ARPA funding. ARPA funded projects should be construction projects or implementation pieces of a larger construction project Funds must be expended by December 2024.

If an ARPA funded project is defunded or reallocated, expenses already incurred will need to be absorbed by the general fund

OPTIONS

1. Do not defund or reallocate any existing projects/do nothing

2. Defund specific projects and reallocate funding

3. Request additional information
FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Council may opt to defund and reallocate project funding. The fiscal impact will vary depending on the Council’s direction.

Please note that if an ARPA funded project is defunded or reallocated, expenses already incurred will need to be absorbed by the general fund.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Infrastructure
Attachments
Attachment 1 - CIP Status Update
Attachment 2 - FY23/24 Unfunded Project List
PGCC 6-7-2023

FY22/23 CIP Status Update June 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Project Fund Name Fund Account Project Name
MultiYear
Project?
Carry
Forward? Status Adopted Budget Amended Budget Expenditures Balance Project Status Notes CIP18-46 Capital Improvement 63 6031 Tide Pool & Point Pinos X X Complete $ 37,953 60,000 $ 8,350 $ $ 51,650 Construction completed. Remaining funds will be carried forward to allow for the second year of the two-year plant monitoring phase through FY24/25.Completed: December 2021.

CIP20-13 Sewer 76 6051 Main Sewer Line Imp (Ovb W/ Phase 4 Urban Diversion) X Complete $ - $ 40,000 $ 40,531 $ (531) This project was engineered and put out to bid in conjunction with the ASBS Stormwater Capture and Diversion Project (CIP18-84). Construction documents and plan sets were finalized in FY20/21. The project was put out to bid in February 2020. A construction contract was authorized in May 2020 City Council meeting. Construction commenced in June 2020. Construction continued through FY20/21. Completed: September 2021 CIP20-14 Recreation Donation 25 6021 Youth Center Heater Complete $ 7,500 $ 7,211 $ 289 Staff experience difficulty obtaining quotes within the project budget. Upon further investigation, it was determined that repairs could be made to two (2) of the heaters that service the building as a cost-effective method to address building heating. The project was carried forward and repairs were made in FY21/22. Completed: November 2021 CIP21-05 Strong Disbursement 46 6021 ADA Compliance Assessment & Transition Plan X Complete $ 26,550 $ 26,550 $ - $ 26,550 This project aims to develop an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance Assessment and Transition Plan for all City facilities. This plan will provide a comprehensive look at current condition of City facilities, provide guidance and an implementation timeline on needed ADA improvements. Consultants performed a thorough assessment of the City's facilities, parks, website and policies and developed a Draft Assessment and Transition Plan. The plan has been provided to the City and is under internal review. Anticipated final invoice will be received shortly utilizing the remaining balance and closing our the contract. Complete Local Streets and Roads 17 6041 $ - 236,647 $ $ 236,647 $ (0) RMRA SB1 47 6041 $ - 250,668 $ $ 250,688 $ (20)
Capital Improvement 63 6041 $ - $ 2,562 $ 2,562 $ -
Sewer 76 6051 $ - 273,345 $ $ 272,979 $ 366
CIP22-02 Local Streets and Roads 17 6041 FY 21/22 Crack & Slurry Seal Complete $ - $ 41,174 $ 41,174 $ 0 The project allowed for the crack and slurry seal of approximately 631,000 SF of street surface, at various locations throughout the City, identified by the Pavement Management Program. Completed: June 2022This project entailed street rehabilitation on two segments of Ocean View Blvd (OVB): (1) OVB from 2nd St to Carmel Ave, and (2) OVB from 17th St to Sea Palm Ave. These road segments were identified based on the City's Pavement Management Program and in-field observations of existing conditions. These heavily trafficked road segments were in "poor" condition with a PCI rating ranging from 33-40. The project was carried forward from the FY1/22 CIP to the FY22/23 CIP to allow for completion Completed: July 2022 CIP22-01 FY 21/22 Street Rehabilitation Complete (1)

FY22/23 CIP Status Update June 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Project Fund Name Fund Account Project Name
MultiYear
Project?
Carry
Forward? Status Adopted Budget Amended Budget Expenditures Balance Project Status Notes CIP22-03 Sewer 76 6051 Phase 9 Sewer Improvements X X Project Development $ 850,000 1,045,106 $ $ 39,672 $ 1,005,434 This project will allow the City to make vital sewer infrastructure improvements. Segments of repair were identified based on videoing of sewer lines and maintenance logs. Locations to be addressed include: Railroad Way (between Jewell & Pico Avenues), Arena Avenue (between Sunset Dr & Asilomar Ave), Asilomar Dunes (Within the Sunset Dr ROW and within a 10-foot utility easement located on, 214 Asilomar Boulevard, located between Sunset Dr & Asilomar Ave), Bently Ave (between Short & Heacock), Cypress Ave (Laurel Ave & Short St), and intersection of 17 Mile Dr & Weldon Grove Pl. Segments of this project are located in sensitive dune habitat. As a result, an initial study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been produced. The document circulated for public review in April. No comments were received. The item will now be scheduled for a CDP before the Planning Commission in July.Subsequently, the project will be put out to bid.

CIP22-04 Museum Improvement 08 6021 Museum Window Replacement & Lead Abatement Complete $ - 39,075 $ 39,233 $ $ (158) This project allowed for the replacement of 39 cracked and broken windows on the Grand Ave, Central Ave and Courtyard facing sides of the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History. The replacement activities triggered lead abatement activities which was also an integral element of this project.Completed: September 2023 CIP22-06 Museum Improvement 08 6021 Museum Roof Repair Complete $ - $ 59,142 $ 56,830 $ 2,312 This project allowed for the repair of the existing roof directly above the Bird Room at the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History. The roof had been leaking and was in dire need of replacement. The scope of work entailed: removal of the existing clay tile roof (~2,784 SF), salvaging the tiles for re-use, installation of a waterproof membrane over the entire roof deck, and reinstallation of the salvaged clay tiles.Completed: March 2023 CIP22-09 Yount Income Fund 41 6031 GW Park Management Plan Construction/Work In Progress $ - $ 12,929 $ 6,194 $ 6,735 Historically, conflicting opinions on management strategies from community stakeholders have not provided adequate direction to balance long term health and fire suppression of the natural areas. This plan was funded to allow for a set of recommendations to be developed by experts. These recommendations would be reviewed by community stakeholders, providing opportunities to build consensus on management strategies and a clear path forward.The draft GWP Forest Management Plan (FMP) was developed to meet the goals of reducing the risk of a destructive wildfire spreading in the park and to improve the overall forest health within the forested area of the Park. The FMP describes the management strategies the City can embark on, over the 5-year FMP timeframe, to reduce wildfire hazard to the homes surrounding the park and to restore healthy forest conditions to the interior of the Park. The FMP addresses the 17-acres of natural forested area (Zones 2, 3 & 4).The draft plan was made available for public review in September 2022. The item was reviewed by the BNRC in November 2022. The item is tentatively scheduled to be brought forth to the City Council in June 2022.

CIP22-10 Koo Estate Donation 93 6031 Lovers' Point Pier Repair Construction/Work In Progress $ - $ 63,429 $ 53,162 $ 10,267 In December 2020, during winter storms the seaward tip of the Lovers Point Pier was severely damaged by wave runup and wave impact forces. A geotechnical and coastal engineering firm was consulted to provide repair recommendations. It was determined that because minimal information on the existing pier structure was available, additional exploration was needed prior to developing repair recommendations. The tip of the pier was closed to ensure safety and will remain closed until repairs can be made.On 12/15/21 the City Council authorized an agreement with GHD for development of a conditions assessment and interim repair solution.Project deliverables including the condition assessment, interim repair design and preliminary information on long-term options are under internal review and will be brought forth to the City Council in May 2023.

CIP22-11 Golf Course 77 6021 Golf Course Clubhouse HVAC Replacement Complete $ - $ 23,608 $ 23,608 $ - The non-operable HVAC, which failed due to age, was replaced. Completed: August 2022

FY22/23 CIP Status Update June 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Project Fund Name Fund Account Project Name
MultiYear
Project?
Carry
Forward? Status Adopted Budget Amended Budget Expenditures Balance Project Status Notes Strong Disbursement 46 6021 $ 75,524 75,524 $ 75,524 $ $ - Capital Improvement 63 6054 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 50,308 $ 24,692 ARPA 84 6021 $ - 132,351 $ $ 132,351 $ -
McIndoo Donation 92 6031 $ 17,529 $ 17,529 $ - $ 17,529 Koo Estate Donation 93 6031 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ - $ 7,000 CIP22-17 ARPA 84 6031 Caledonia Park Children'S Picnic Area COMPLETE $ - $ 6,173 $ 6,173 $ - This project included the purchase and installation of 3 new picnic tables to replace existing rotting tables at Caledonia Park.Completed: August 2022 CIP22-21 ARPA 84 6031 GW Park Playground & ADA Compliant Playground X Bids/RFP $ - $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 At the December 15, 2021 meeting, the City Council allocated $25,000 of funding to allow for installation of ADA compliant playground equipment and equipment for young children (2-5 years old). Initial research revealed $25,000 was not sufficient to allow for purchase and installation of suitable equipment. City staff began to pursue grant funding via the California Department of Parks & Recreation's Per Capita Grant Program. On May 18, 2022, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the submission of two (2) Per Capita Grant Program Applications to the State of California’s Department of Parks and Recreation.A grant agreement for $81,952 was awarded to the City. This paired with the original project allocations brings the total project allotment to $106,952. An RFP was issued and closed in March 2022. The proposal submitted is currently being reviewed by Staff and was brought forth to the Recreation Board at their May meeting. The item will be brought forth to the Council in the near future.

X
Complete
Bids/RFP
This project allows for the replacement of failed stormwater infrastructure on Del Monte Blvd from Coral St to Esplanade St. These improvements will help ensure surface flow is properly channeled into the stormwater collection network protecting the bay and the Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS).The scope of work includes: replacement of 390LF of failed stormwater pipe, installation of 60LF of new stormwater pipe, construction of 3 storm drain access point manholes, reconstruction of 1 catch basin, and construction of 2 new catch basins. A construction contract was awarded atthe February 1, 2023 meeting.Construction commenced in March 2023 and is currently underway. Construction activities concluded in May. Completed: May 2023 Through the City’s FY21/22 CIP, funding was approved for the replacement of the backstop at 17 Mile Drive Ball Field with a total allocated budget of $24,000. The existing backstop has significantly deteriorated and needs replacement. Projects bids received were well over the allocated budget and ranged from $77,000 - $95,000. The City began to pursue grant funding via the State of California's Per Capital Grant Program to bridge the funding shortfall and make necessary replacements to the heavily used recreation infrastructure.On May 18, 2022, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the submission of two (2) Per Capita Grant Program Applications to the State of California’s Department of Parks and Recreation.A grant agreement for $96,000 was awarded to the City. This paired with the original project allocations brings the total project allotment to $120,429. An RFP is currently circulating closing June Del Monte Blvd Storm Drain Improvements
CIP22-13 Backstop Replacement Municipal Ball ParkCIP22-12

FY22/23 CIP Status Update June 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Project Fund Name Fund Account Project Name
MultiYear
Project?
Carry
Forward? Status Adopted Budget Amended Budget Expenditures Balance Project Status Notes Local Streets and Roads 17 6041 $ 396,304 1,015,304 $ $ 1,015,304 RMRA SB1 47 6041 $ 354,138 354,138 $ - $ $ 354,138
Capital Improvement 63 6041 $ 300,000 300,000 $ $ 147,858 $ 152,142 Sewer 76 6051 $ 250,000 250,000 $ $ 35,875 $ 214,125
Local Streets and Roads 17 6041 $ 100,000 100,000 $ $ 100,000 Capital Improvement 63 6041 $ 200,000 200,000 $ $ 13,166 $ 186,834 CIP23-03 RSTP (TAMC) 20 6041 Cedar, Sunset, & Congress Intersection X X Contract $1,000,000 332,430 $ $ 172 $ 332,258 A competitive Request for Qualifications was issued in January. In February the solicitation period closed. Firm interviews were held in April. The item will be brought forward to the Council in June for agreement authorization.

CIP23-04 Local Streets and Roads 17 6041 David Avenue Street Rehabilitation (1) X X Project Development $ 400,000 300,000 $ $ 11,693 $ 288,307 This project is being engineered. The City is working closely with Caltrans, as they are currently making sidewalk and access improvements to this area. Following engineering, the project will be put out to bid.

CIP23-05 Lighthouse 27 6021 Point Pinos Lighthouse Roof Repair X Project Development $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 2,050 $ 57,950 The Heritage Society is currently researching ideal roofing material type in advance of an RFP being released.

CIP23-06 Sewer 76 6051 Pump Station Replacement X X Contract $ 110,000 110,000 $ $ 163 $ 109,837 This project will allow for the replacement of the deteriorated pump station. A Request for Qualifications was issued in January and closed in February. Staff is scheduled to bring the item forward in June for award of contract.

CIP23-07 Museum Improvement 08 6021 Museum Mezzanine Upgrades X Bids/RFP $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ 75,000 City Staff has worked with the Museum to determine the best approach forward to ensure the needs and use of the space are met. City staff is in the process of obtaining quotes from fabricators.

CIP23-08 Museum Improvement 08 6021 Museum Basement Moisture Control X Project Development $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 1,200 $ 38,800 Museum has onboarded a new Collections and Exhibits Manager. City staff is working with the manager to exploring ideas for improving the moisture in the collections storage area to address staff concerns.

CIP23-09 Gas Tax 18 6041 Street Sign Upgrades Complete $ 30,000 30,000 $ 20,609 $ $ 9,391 Signs, poles, and hardware are have been ordered and received. Items will be installed. Approximately 400 signs.

This project will address the aging road infrastructure network, increase the PCI on four (4) road segments that are in "poor" or "failed" condition, address underground aging infrastructure, and ensure the City meets Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirements. This Street Rehabilitation project will address the following four (4) road segments:(1) 13th St, from Lighthouse Ave to Ocean View Blvd (OVB) (PCI 16)(2) 15th St, from OVB to Lighthouse Ave (PCI 9)(3) 16th St, from OVB to Central Ave (PCI 46)(4) 16th St, from Pine Ave to Junipero Ave (PCI 47)An agreement was awarded in April. Construction commenced in May and is anticipated to conclude in the fiscal year. This project will allow the City to address 630,000SF of roadway at various locations in the City. Streets to receive the crack & slurry seal treatment are identified via the City's Pavement Management Program, maintenance logs, and in-field observations. Construction is scheduled to commence on 6/6. It is anticipated that all work will conclude by the end of the fiscal year.

CIP23-01CIP23-02
FY 22/23 Street Rehabilitation ProjectFY 22/23 Crack & Slurry Seal Construction/Work In ProgressConstruction/Work In Progress

FY22/23 CIP Status Update June 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Project Fund Name Fund Account Project Name
MultiYear
Project?
Carry
Forward? Status Adopted Budget Amended Budget Expenditures Balance Project Status Notes CIP23-10 ARPA 84 6021 Fire Station Roof Repair X Construction/Work In Progress $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ - $ 35,000 Initial repairs complete to the overhang fascia and gutter at the front of the station are complete. Quotes are being obtained for additional repairs identified during the rainy season; this includes addressing leaks above the staircase area and training tower CIP23-11 ARPA 84 6021 Fire Dept. Exhaust System/HVAC & Filtration Cleaning Complete $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 18,178 $ 1,822 Exhaust system was replaced to better fit engines/trucks and better capture fumes.

CIP23-12 ARPA 84 6021 Fire Dept. Bathroom & Shower Remodel Bids/RFP $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 1,700 $ 48,300 A call for bids was released in May. The bid period will close on June 15th.

CIP23-13 ARPA 84 6021 Chautauqua Hall Bathroom Repairs Contract $ 27,000 $ 27,000 $ - $ 27,000 Contract being developed and routed for signatures; this will allow for the replacement of the deteriorated flooring in the restrooms.

CIP23-14 ARPA 84 6021 Chautauqua Hall Main Roof Repairs Complete $ 54,000 $ 54,000 $ 163 $ 53,837 This project allowed for the re-roof the west facing half of the “Main Hall” roof and the bell tower at the project site (approximately 2,600 SF). Completed in April 2023.

CIP23-15 ARPA 84 6021 Crespi Pond Bathroom Replacement X X Project Development $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 This item was reviewed by the HRC. The HRC was unable to make a determination; City staff is working on obtaining a Phase I historic report. The bathroom at this location is not up to current standards. This is the only City restroom available to the public between Lovers Point and the end of the City's coastline.

CIP23-16 ARPA 84 6041 Wig-Wag Lights At Robert Down School Deferred Indefinitely $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 This item has been by the City Traffic Engineer. Wig-Wag lights are not recommended at this location and will not enhance safety. Recommendations include striping (pavement markings) that can be performed by in-house crews.

CIP23-17 ARPA 84 6021 Chautauqua Hall Preservation Plan X Construction/Work In Progress $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - Contract routed. Work to perform the preservation plan underway.

CIP23-18 ARPA 84 6021 City Hall Roof Repair X Bids/RFP $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ 80,000 Crews will embark on repairs to the sheet metal flashing and vent above the City Manager's Office/Conference Room ($11,000) in June. It is believed that these repairs will address the existing leaking. Previous in-house repair work to seal the gaps allowing water intrusion, lasted the majority of the rainy season and have resurfaced over the last rain event.Inspection of the roof has revealed that a larger replacement is warranted. Staff is working on producing an RFP to obtain quotes for a larger, much needed roof repair.

CIP23-19 ARPA 84 6031 Purple Pipe Project X X Construction/Work In Progress $ 120,000 $ 38,675 $ 27,561 $ 11,113 Original budget adjusted down by from $120,000 to $38,675 during the mid year process to reflected anticipated expenses that would occur in the Fiscal Year. Expansion analysis complete and scheduled for Council review in June.

FY22/23 CIP Status Update June 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Project Fund Name Fund Account Project Name
MultiYear
Project?
Carry
Forward? Status Adopted Budget Amended Budget Expenditures Balance Project Status Notes CIP23-20 ARPA 84 6031 Skate Park X X Project Development $ 158,000 158,000 $ $ 4,441 $ 153,559 A skatepark survey was made available from 11/18 -12/23 to gather input from the community. Several hearings before the recreation board occurred. In April 2023, the City Council held a discussion of the proposed skatepark locations. A consensus on a location was not reached. Ultimately, the City Council opted to not pursue further discussion with Pacific Grove Unified School District (related to the two sites owned by PGUSD). Council also asked staff to return with evaluation of alternate skatepark sites that are smaller and avoid neighborhood and residential impacts.

CIP23-21 ARPA 84 6041 David Ave Sidewalk X X Project Development $ 360,000 360,000 $ $ 4,708 $ 355,292 Conceptual options for David Avenue sidewalks have been developed by the City's engineer. Ultimately, construction of sidewalks will be costly and there is not sufficient funding to address all of the sidewalk The item will be brought forward to the City Council in July for feedback and direction.

CIP23-22 ARPA 84 6031 Recreation Board's Park Inventory Construction/Work In Progress $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 5,112 $ 44,888 At their 7/28/22 meeting, the Recreation Board requested that the funding be put toward:-Picnic tables (Caledonia Park, the Recreation Trail, Higgings Park and GWP)-Storm drain improvements at Arnett Park-Re-build the Gazebo Elmarie DykeThe first two items have been completed under budget. The remaining element, the Gazebo, is anticipated to cost around $12,000. It is anticipated there will be project savings.

TRC21-02 Capital Improvement 63 6021 PW Fire and Reconstruction Construction/Work In Progress $ 787,500 1,217,972 $ $ 636,790 $ 581,182 Repairs to the Public Work Administrative Office and Metal Warehouse are complete. Electrical repairs at the yard are 90% complete. As of May 31 the Public Works Admin team has moved back into the main office.

CIP23-24 RSTP (TAMC) 20 6054 18th Street & Spruce Ave Stormwater Infrastructure Repairs X Construction/Work In Progress $ 39,950 $ - $ 39,950 Anticipated to begin construction in June. Anticipated to complete majority of construction activities within the fiscal year; minor punch list/cleanup items may carry forward into early July.

CIP23-23 RSTP (TAMC) 20 6041 Flashing Beacon at 19th and Sunset X Construction/Work In Progress $ 42,480 $ - $ 42,480 Contract with BEAR Electric, Inc. executed. Permit from Caltrans issued. Construction activities to commence in June. It is anticipated work will carry forward into the FY23/24 Fiscal Year. Scope of work includes: electrical upgrades to allow an additional RRFB that is push button activated and ties in with the existing in-road way lights and communicates with the controller. Striping and signage improvements.

Reference # Project Name Project Description Project Justification FY 23/24 Project Cost Please provide the proposed budget for the project. Is this a multi‐year project? Multi‐Year Project Additional Information Board, Commission, Committee Submissions? Goal Alignment 1 Police Station Lobby & Office Improvements
Improve the layout of the police station lobby to better serve our community. As well as reorganizing staff work spaces to both improve service and encourage good employee ergonomics. Building improvements include creating a public information center, improving front counter access, purchasing and rearranging staff work spaces, installing new flooring, electrical, lighting, and new paint.

To both improve service to our community and align with employee safety best practices. $35,000 No Infrastructure;
Environmental
Stewardship
2 City Yard Police Garage Renovation Improve garage security, including physical building improvements, installing new security cameras, alarm system and key access. In addition, improve safety and access to the loft area for property storage.

In order to ensure compliance with CALEA standards, as well as general best practices, improving security and access of the police garage is crucial. There is a need to securely store larger property items, such as bicycles, vehicles and other items not easily stored at the police station.
$35,000 No Infrastructure
3 Police Station Parking - Exterior Fence Install exterior fence for parking lot located behind the police station. Include access control system for gated access. Ensure City staff pedestrian access to City Hall. It will ensure additional security of City police vehicles. $200,000 No Infrastructure 4 Monarch Sanctuary Fence Replacement Project Replacement of all existing fencing along the entire pathway within the Monarch Sanctuary. The current fencing is rope/cable/post fencing and would be upgraded to split rail fencing. The existing fencing is not stable (i.e. posts fall over and rope/cable sags). As such, it does not provide an adequate barrier between the public pathway and the treed sanctuary. The new split rail fencing will be more stable, will provide the desired barrier, and will enhance public safety. $75,000 No BNRC Infrastructure 5 Tree Well Improvement Project
Improvement of existing tree wells for trees planted along the sidewalks in the City’s commercial district. This improvement project would consist of (I) increasing the size of existing “street tree” wells and then (ii) filling them with Rubberway material to be flush with the sidewalks and otherwise in compliance with the ADA and local code.

The estimated cost of this Project is $41,600 (32 tree wells at $1,300 per tree well).

Suggested locations are: Fountain, Grand and Forest avenues between Lighthouse and Laurel.

This Project furthers several City Goals, primarily in the categories of environmental stewardship and infrastructure maintenance. This Project would: (i) reduce stormwater runoff, (ii) improve street tree health through the increase of water to the tree roots, (iii) increase retention of rainwater in the soil to replenish the natural watershed, and (iv) and reduce sidewalk cracking/uplifting, thus reducing the need for sidewalk repairs. In addition, the public safety is promoted by eliminating tripping hazards from the cracked/heaved concrete. $41,600 No BNRC
Infrastructure;
Environmental
Stewardship
6 George Washington Park (“GWP”) Enhancement Project
This GWP Enhancement Project would include (i) the purchase, planting and Maintenance of 80 Monterey Pine Trees and 100 plants native to GWP, (ii) the fabrication and erection of a new GWP entrance sign and informational/interpretive signage within the park, (iii) replenishment of wood chips on the trails within GWP (and barriers erected around fallen trees) and (iv) the transplanting of Poison Oak from trails to protected areas to encourage trail usage (Point Lobos design).

GWP is showing signs of Monterey Pine and Monarch Butterfly habitat recovery in small sections due to the many years of volunteer and Public Works attention. Collaborative scaling efforts between volunteers, the City of Pacific Grove staff and Landscaping consultants are needed at this point to assist the restoration and rehabilitation of multiple endangered species within GWP. Purchasing of Monterey Pine Trees and native plants, planting (with wire baskets), maintenance, along with posts, protective fencing encourage continued restoration. A new wood sign at the entrance of the Park at Sinex and Alder will upgrade park appearance and informational signage along the trails will enhance public awareness of the many plant and animal species that thrive in (and depend upon) this diverse urban forest. $50,000 No BNRC
Infrastructure;
Environmental
Stewardship
7 Add and/or replace sidewalks
within the business districts, along
Pine, and along other safe routes
to school.

Certain areas within Pacific Grove have no sidewalks or sidewalks in disrepair, which is a safety concern brought by citizens to the Traffic Safety Commission. A lack of sidewalks or hazardous sidewalks have negative implications for all residents. Those greatly impacted are individuals with limited mobility, families with strollers, and individuals on scooters, roller skates, or skateboards. These improvements should take into account Complete Streets best practices.

Improve pedestrian safety and increase ability to navigate freely throughout Pacific Grove. $50,000 Yes Traffic Safety Commission Infrastructure 8 Increase improvements of roads,
remove potholes, and add bike
lanes.

There are many streets where lack of maintenance is causing safety issues and further road deterioration. These improvements should take into account Complete Streets best practices.

Improve safety, add bike lanes, and improve PCI. This is a Council Decision on how much to propose for the budget Yes This is a Council Decision on how much to
propose for the budget and depends on
scope.

Traffic Safety
Commission Infrastructure
9 Sunset Drive pedestrian path at Asilomar Beach Requesting to widen an existing path along the shoulder of Sunset Drive from Asilomar Beach, up the hill, to the boardwalk trailhead to provide a safer route for pedestrians and reduce conflicts with cyclists and drivers.

Improves pedestrian and cyclist safety. $250,000 No Traffic Safety Commission Infrastructure 10 Downtown Lighthouse Pedestrian Promenade Study
Explore multiple options to create a downtown space limited to only pedestrians and cyclists along Lighthouse Avenue in order to improve downtown safety and increase downtown business vibrancy. It should also include funds for a rigorous public outreach campaign.

Improves safety, walkability, bikeability, and downtown vibrancy. $200,000 Yes Unsure of total project cost it depends on
the scope of the project after the initial
study is conducted. Initial study estimated at
about $200k.

Traffic Safety
Commission Infrastructure
11 Pine Avenue Reconfiguration Study
Explore multiple options to reconfigure Pine Avenue following Complete Streets best practices that enable Safe Routes to School, expand the native habitat for the Pacific Monarch, and create a bicycle promenade, while still allowing for some parking on Pine Avenue for residents. It should also include funds for a rigorous public outreach campaign.

Improves safety, walkability, bikeability, and adds to green spaces within Pacific Grove for Pacific Monarch natural habitat. $150,000 Yes Depends on the scope of the project as
determined by the initial study. The initial
study is estimated to be $150k.

Traffic Safety
Commission Infrastructure
FY23/24 Unfunded Project List
PGCC 6-7-2023 1

12 Bike parking at Asilomar Beach
Request to add a significant amount of bike parking (U-racks) at Asilomar Beach. This could potentially mean removing car parking spaces to add bike corrals at Asilomar Beach for the large number of Pacific Grove residents and visitors that enjoy recreational cycling. This should take into account Complete Streets best practices.

Reduces car traffic and improves safety and public health. $15,000 No Traffic Safety Commission Infrastructure 13 HVAC Deep Cleaning/HEPA Filtration System To have the HVAC system professionally deep cleaned and possibly have a HEPA filtration added to the system. Deep cleaning the HVAC system would allow for safer air circulation throughout the building. By adding the HEPA filtration system, it would assist in keeping mold and diesel exhaust from circulating throughout the station. $5,000 No Infrastructure14 New Electrical Panel and
Connections At Main and Subpanel at Fire Station Replacing the electrical panel and connections at the Fire Station due to water damage from a leak. By replacing the electrical panel and its connections, it will assist in preventing any potential electrical fires and future damages. $5,000 No Infrastructure 15 Carpet Replacement at the Fire Station Removing the existing carpet throughout the station, repairing any subfloor damage from previous roof leaks and installing new carpet/flooring. The existing carpet is worn causing the subfloor to be exposed and damaged from previous roof leaks. $8,000 No Infrastructure16 Kitchen Cabinet Replacement at the Fire Station Cabinets were built in the 1970's and need major repair or replacing. With the cabinets and drawers being 50 years old they are having to be repaired constantly so they do not fall off causing safety issues. $15,000 to refurbish, or $50,000 for replacement Yes The project can be split in half, one side of the cabinets can be replaced on year and the other side the following year. Infrastructure 17 Dormitory Window Replacement at the Fire Station Replacing existing single pane windows with double pane windows at the Fire Station. By replacing the windows with double pane windows, the City would be more environmentally friendly by cutting down the use of natural gas heater. $70,000 No Infrastructure 18 Bicycle Network Plan Develop a plan for a city-wide bicycle network, with bike lanes, boulevards, and storage infrastructure. Pacific Grove needs to be more bicycle-friendly to reduce carbon emissions and to provide alternative modes of transportation throughout the City. $100,000 Yes Total project cost unknown. FY23/24 -
$100,000 for plan development. Cost in
subsequent fiscal years would be
determined by the implementation of an
approved plan.

Planning
Commission Infrastructure
19 Increased level of maintenance at City Parks Improve maintenance in City parks, including completion of deferred projects. This project would increase the amount PW has budgeted by $100,000. City parks need to be maintained for the enjoyment of residents and visitors. Deferred projects and lack of adequate maintenance decreases the usability and enjoyment of park areas. $100,000 No Planning Commission Infrastructure 20 Replace or repair sidewalks. Replace or repair sidewalks in the City, especially in the downtown area. Well-maintained sidewalks improve the walkability of the City and decrease accident liability. $250,000 No Planning Commission Infrastructure 21 City Infrastructure Plan
Develop a plan to update the City's infrastructure, including sidewalks and bike lanes in order to promote traffic safety and accessibility issues. Integrate plans with TAMC and other peninsula cities.

The City needs a comprehensive and integrated infrastructure management plan to ensure maintenance and repair of City assets occurs at a frequency that allows efficient and effective stewardship of City resources. $200,000 No Planning Commission Infrastructure 22 Mural Restoration Improve and restore the large mural (aka Lover's Point Mural) showing the history of Pacific Grove on the City's recreation trail. This mural expresses the rich and diverse history of Pacific Grove for the enjoyment of residents and visitors. $50,000 No Planning Commission 23 Cultural Resources Monitoring Protocol Complete a draft document and submit/bring forward for Planning Commission and City Council consideration and adoption. Protection of cultural and historic resources and treatment of resources with appropriate respect and dignity. $10,000 No Planning Commission 24 Painting of crosswalks and parking
spaces. Paint crosswalks and parking spaces on City streets. Improved pedestrian and vehicle safety. $50,000 No Planning Commission Infrastructure 25 Accessible Public Access
Provide safe, accessible and ADA-compliant public access on the shoreline, through walkways and viewing platforms. This effort should involve a climate adaptation plan with longitudinal measures and life span expectation in order to address climate change.

Accessible public access ensures all residents and visitors may enjoy the beautiful shoreline of Pacific Grove. $100,000 Yes Total Project Cost $250,000. FY23/24
$100,000 for plan development. FY24/25
$150,000 for implementation/construction.

Planning
Commission Infrastructure
26 Parks and Open Space Plan
The Parks and Open Space Plan (POSP) will examine existing parks, recreational facilities and open space throughout Pacific Grove in comparison to community needs, access and potential for development of new or shared recreational facilities. The city’s General Plan specifies many goals and policies for the ongoing review of the community’s park, recreation and open space, most of which appear to be out of date. Section 5.2 of the General Plan outlines various policies related to the ongoing review and evaluation of park facilities and recreation needs that are included in this project. There are also possibilities to share resources and facilities with other organizations and agencies in the community to help achieve recreational goals and services. The Recreation Board has expressed a need for such a study to provide a mechanism for community input regarding related public facilities including play courts, athletic fields, dog park, fitness course, bicycle pump track, etc. The value of such a plan is to globally evaluate recreational facilities and program opportunities to determine the best means possible for identifying public needs and addressing deficiencies. The POSP will also make recommendations for achieving goals as they relate to the General Plan and for developing a long-term approach to maximizing park, recreation and open space opportunities for residents and visitors to the community.

The Parks and Open Space Plan is essential for solidifying a comprehensive plan for addressing current and future park, recreation and open space issues in Pacific Grove. $35,000 No Recreation Board Infrastructure; Recreation FY23/24 Unfunded Project List
PGCC 6-7-2023 2

27 George Washington Park Master Plan Review and Design The south zone (with the baseball field, bathroom, picnic area, and playground) of George Washington Park (GWP) is much in need of an evaluation of its master plan and redesign of park features to bring the park up to current codes such as ADA and U.S.Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) Guidelines and to improve user experiences at the park. The project would look at the amenities of existing facilities including the ball field, large BBQ area, children’s play area, picnic grove, park circulation, etc. and border treatment of the natural area to the north. The work includes landscape architect led public meetings to obtain input from residents on how best to improve conditions and facilities at the park, conceptual drawing(s), cost estimates and timetable for introducing phased improvements at GWP.

The park is one of the heaviest use public parks in the system and many of its infrastructural components need updating; there currently exist code compliance issues. The project will address safety and environmental issues at the park including pathway improvements to better accommodate ballfield use, park maintenance servicing and pedestrian and bicycle usage, water conservation and forestry management recommendations. Funding the project at this time will result in a plan that can be used for developing future related capital projects for phased improvements at GWP, portions of which may be eligible for grant funding.
$28,000 No Recreation Board Infrastructure; Recreation
28 George Washington Park Stormwater Runoff Improvements The George Washington Park Storm Water Runoff Drainage Project will address site drainage issues originating at the east side of the park at Alder Street and Gibson Avenue to the west side of the park at 17 Mile Drive and Melrose Avenue. At present, there is virtually no drainage at the park and storm water runoff flows from the east side of the park to the lower portion on the west side out onto the intersection of 17 Mile Drive and Melrose Avenue. This causes erosion of the ball field’s infield around the north side of the ball field. It also causes the outfield to remain soggy into the spring. The project will engineer, design and construct approximately 540 LF of storm collection system including pervious pathway to prevent erosion and runoff of pathway materials into the surrounding neighborhood. The project will improve the overall safety of the park in addition to constructing an ADA compliant pathway that will shed storm water to a collection location where it can be properly collected and disposed of to the storm system.

The GWP Storm Water Runoff Drainage Project will reduce the potential for erosion and silt going into the ocean, as well as flooding in nearby neighborhoods and improve safety thoroughfare at the park for pedestrians. $195,000 No Recreation Board Infrastructure 29 Athletic Facilities Repairs and Improvements
Provide for repairs, improvements, equipment and enhanced access to sports facilities and athletic fields around the community. This would include funding for soccer, basketball, baseball, tennis court, volleyball, and other sports. The specific improvements would be based on community input but could include tennis court crack repair, deer fencing at GWP, purchase of soccer goals, installation of water fountains at fields and courts, etc. Increased access could also entail funding to provide improvements and/or more hours to use PGUSD facilities such as courts, pool, and fields.

Athletic facilities provide our citizens with the opportunity to enjoy recreational activities that support healthy lifestyles.

Quality facilities encourage citizens to engage in fitness and show that the city supports the health of the community.

COVID-19 kept people indoors and allowed some of the city facilities to fall into disrepair. All ages can benefit from this investment but our youth are particularly in need of facilities to provide alternatives to being on screens. There is also currently a lack of city facilities for basketball, soccer, and other field sports. These shortages could be mitigated by investment in city property or partnerships with PGUSD. $75,000 No Recreation Board Infrastructure; Recreation
30 Street repairs, sidewalks on David
Ave and Patterson, Del Monte
Park Area
repair streets and sidewalks bike lanes through out town obviously if not all can be funded unless, council dads more to cip budget $1,000,000 Yes 1 million, 50k to engineering ;from worst streets to gutters, 750k construction 23-25 Infrastructure 31 Repair Rocky Shores Coastal Trail Replace boardwalk that was washed away in storm with a trail at a higher elevation. Repair of existing recreational trail $200,000 No Infrastructure32 Plant Public Trees Plant trees on public property Climate action and beautification $150/tree plus ongoing watering for 2 years No Environmental Stewardship33 David Avenue Sidewalk This multi-year project would entail engineering, design and construction of an ADA compliant sidewalk on David Avenue between Patterson Lane and Montecito Ave. The project will require retaining walls, rolled curb/stormwater improvements, and possible removal of vegetation.

Safe routes to school for Del Monte Park neighborhood $1,000,000 Yes TBD Infrastructure 34 Urban Canopy Improvement Project
The CEQA mitigation of the 2012 revision of the city tree ordinance called for the city to plant hundreds of trees per year, but this aggressive planting has not happened. To help address the growing tree deficit, we propose strategic planting at least 40 trees: primarily native upper canopy and/or monarch butterfly habitat trees. In addition, we request a part-time position in Public Works established for the purpose of planting and watering the newly planted trees for a minimum of two years.

Urban trees are an important resource and provide many benefits to Pacific Grove. Besides being aesthetically pleasing and providing health benefits to residents and attracting tourists, trees improve air quality, reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), reduce impacts of storm water runoff and soil erosion, provide important wildlife habitat, and are important modifiers of climate change. In September 2012 the city of Pacific Grove established a 25-year city-wide target of achieving a total canopy cover of 33%. According to the 2015 Urban Tree Canopy Assessment, the city of Pacific Grove had 28.6% of existing canopy with a canopy potential of 57%. The city committed to massive planting when the city council adopted revisions to the tree ordinance in 2012, but such planting has never begun and the urban tree deficit in Pacific Grove continues to increase, particularly in light of recent storms. This project meets the city council goals for environmental stewardship and Climate Action and Adaptation. It also addresses the economic development goals of beautifying the downtown area to make it more inviting for visitors to attract more patrons to our Downtown/Business District dining and retail establishments.
$80,000 Yes
$20,000 to purchase and plant in year 1,
$30,000/yr in year 1 and year 2 for a part
time Public Works position dedicated to
planting and watering trees for the total
cost of funds requested of $80,000.

Environmental
Stewardship
35 Downtown/Business District Tree Improvement Project
The CEQA mitigation of the 2012 revision of the city tree ordinance called for the city to plant hundreds of trees per year, but this aggressive planting has not happened. To help address the growing tree deficit and to help beautify the downtown/business district, we propose strategic planting at least 20 native evergreen and/or leafy green trees in sidewalk areas, as well as 3-5 upper canopy (e.g., cypress) trees to provide additional habitat trees in the center divide on Lighthouse Ave. This project would also include native plants and flowers in the tree wells to enhance the beauty and protect the soil. To support the health and vitality of the new trees, we request a part-time position in Public Works established for the purpose of planting and watering the newly planted trees for a minimum of two years.

Urban trees are an important resource and provide many benefits to Pacific Grove. Besides being aesthetically pleasing and providing health benefits to residents and attracting tourists, trees improve air quality, reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), reduce impacts of storm water runoff and soil erosion, provide important wildlife habitat, and are important modifiers of climate change. In September 2012 the city of Pacific Grove established a 25-year city-wide target of achieving a total canopy cover of 33%. According to the 2015 Urban Tree Canopy Assessment, the city of Pacific Grove had 28.6% of existing canopy with a canopy potential of 57%. The city committed to massive planting when the city council adopted revisions to the tree ordinance in 2012, but such planting has never begun and the urban tree deficit in Pacific Grove continues to increase, particularly in light of recent storms. This project meets the city council goals for environmental stewardship and Climate Action and Adaptation. It also addresses the economic development goals of beautifying the downtown area to make it more inviting for visitors to attract more patrons to our Downtown/Business District dining and retail establishments.
$70,000 Yes
We are requesting $10,000 to purchase and
plant trees the first year and $30,000/yr for
year 1 and 2 for a part time Public Works
position dedicated to planting and
watering trees. The costs of maintenance
would be reduced if funded in conjunction
with other tree-planting projects.

Environmental
Stewardship
FY23/24 Unfunded Project List
PGCC 6-7-2023 3

36 Muni Ballpark turf installation of sports field turf to replace existing grass and dirt playing surfaces.

Municipal Field has been a part of the Pacific Grove landscape since the early 1930s. The ballpark was constructed with a combination of private funds and New Deal relief labor during the height of the great depression. It has served the recreation needs of the community for a considerable time and continues this tradition today. Municipal Field has served thousands of youth baseball and softball participants throughout its history and this year alone will serve PG High School Softball and over 500 youth participants in PONY Baseball. This park serves the community. With the changes in fiscal responsibility and escalating costs to maintain this field it is the vision to bring the playing surface of the park in line with today’s playing surface innovations. The improved field will see a drastic reduction in maintenance costs and environmental concerns for the city. These costs will include an immediate stop to weekly grass upkeep and the field will be ready for sports usage immediately. PONY baseball has numerous volunteers that must prepare the field prior to its use before and after each sports contest. The series of weather events at the start of 2023 has made the field virtually unplayable and has forced the local sports teams to either cancel contests or move to facilities in adjoining communities.

The biggest attribute to field renovation is the complete stoppage of any water usage to the field surface. With the improvements the field could be utilized by additional youth sports programs such as soccer, lacrosse, and flag football programs. The field could also turn into a major destination for youth softball and baseball tournaments throughout Central California while generating significant rental revenue for the city. This in turn could yield carryover revenue for the various hotels and restaurants in Pacific Grove. This renovation will not change the footprint of the field in any manner nor infringe on any environmental concerns.

Initial estimated costs for the renovation are projected at 600k to 700K for a field the size of municipal field. The renovation has the full support of PONY Baseball and its non-profit fundraising initiatives. It is the intent of PONY Baseball to raise over 300k of the total funds needed to renovate the park for current and future generations. It is the intent to partner with local contractors who have an interest in seeing Muni Field preserved thus further reducing the overall cost. $700,000 No Infrastructure; Recreation
37 Chinese Pavilion Along Coastline This project would allow for the construction of a Chinese Pavilion on City Property along the coastline. This project was submitted as an art project, via the City's Art Form to the BNRC. The BNRC recommended inclusion on the CIP. $175,000 No No Infrastructure
38 PG Museum of Natural History Carpet Replacement Replace the carpets in the second floor of the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History spaces. The carpets are old, deteriorated and are in need of replacement. $50,000 No Museum Board Infrastructure 39 Additional Funding for Point Pinos Lighthouse Roof Repair The Museum Board Requested an item be added to the CIP to provide additional funding to the FY22/23 CIP project to replace the Point Pinos Lighthouse Roof. Project development by the Heritage Society is still underway for the appropriate material type. TBD No Museum Board Infrastructure40 Bus Stop Sidewalk, Curb and ADA ramp improvements This project would allow for sidewalk, curb and ada ramp improvements associated with future bus stops. It is anticipated that there will be 5-7 new bus stop locations; specific locations TBD. $75,000 Yes Infrastructure 41 Downtown Bulbout Improvements This project would allow increased safety improvements downtown via construction of bulbouts and center median parking restriping. $250,000 Yes Infrastructure 42 Stormwater Master Plan
This project would allow for the development of a stormwater master plan. The master plan would provide the City with direction on upgrades and stormwater assert management needs. This would also be the starting point for the proposition 218 process to develop a dedicated stormwater fund.

There is currently no dedicated stormwater funding for stormwater projects; this often results in stormwater infrastructure repairs being deferred due to insufficient funding. $400,000
Infrastructure;
Environmental
Stewardship
43 City Asset Management Assessment & Plan
All city owned buildings an asset schedule of required repairs, upgrades and replaces (interior and exterior)
City Hall, PW Yard, PD, Fire, Library, Youth Center, Museum, Golf Course Club House and Maintenance Facility, Point Pinos Grill, Beach House, Lovers Point Grill, Cave, Community Center, and Poets Perch
$350,000
Infrastructure;
Environmental
Stewardship
44 City Fleet Plan New software program, develop program $75,000 Infrastructure;
Environmental
Stewardship
FY23/24 Unfunded Project List 4
44 45 Library Backup Power Project This project will allow the City to explore and install a backup power source for the Pacific Grove Public Library. Currently, the Library does not have a power backup to run essential community services when the power goes down.

As an element of this project, the City will explore more renewable and green options to the standard diesel generator. This project will also require new wiring be installed from the interior of the building to the backup power source.

The Friends of the Pacific Grove Public Library and the Pacific Grove Library Foundation have expressed interest in donating the funds for the purchase of the back-up power source, with the design and construction costs being covered by the City. The full project cost is reflected in the proposed budget. If approved, the City would formalize the details with these entities and reimbursements would be received. $50,000
Infrastructure;Environmental Stewardship
PGCC 6-7-2023

Agenda No. 12 F

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Bill Peake, Mayor
MEETING DATE: June 07, 2023
SUBJECT: Council Policy Posting Contracts and Agreements Online CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Direct the City Attorney to return with a Council Resolution creating Posting Contracts and Agreements Online Policy 000-29.

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

DISCUSSION
A draft ‘Posting Contracts and Agreements Online’ Policy 000-29 is attached.

Posting important documents is a practice by many cities in California.

Posting allows public confirmation of Council and Staff actions.

Posting provides ease of public access.

Posting reduces public records requests.

Posting will enhance the public’s trust and confidence in local government.

A contract was recently awarded to Cities Digital Inc. and a Document Management System implemented.

Phase I with posting of vendor contracts to a public portal was launched February 2023.

Phase II will include other types of City agreements such as leases and grants and include a search capability.

Posting of documents should be in accordance with Records Management and Records Retention Schedule Policy 000-19.

OPTIONS
N/A
FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact.

GOAL ALIGNMENT: Not Applicable.

Attachments
PGCC 6-7-2023

Draft Policy
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove
City Council Policy
Policy Governing Policy No. Effective Date Page
Posting Contracts and Agreements
Online
000-29 xxx 1 of 1
PURPOSE:

To provide ease of public access to important contracts and agreements describing actions taken by city government.

POLICY & PROCEDURE:

All contracts and agreements having a value of $5,000 or greater shall be posted online within 30 days of execution by all parties.

Contracts and agreements shall include but not be limited to:
• purchases
• construction, professional, maintenance, and vendor services • leases
• grants
• loans
• promissory notes
• franchises
• other contracts and agreements
Confidential information contained within vendor or legal services contracts or other agreements shall be excluded on approval by the City Attorney.

Contracts and agreements shall remain posted in accordance with Council Policy 000-19 Records Management and Records Retention Schedule.

Adopted xxx - Resolution 23-xxx
PGCC 6-7-2023

Agenda No. 13 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ben Harvey, City Manager
MEETING DATE: June 07, 2023
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with Tripepi Smith for Communication Services CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Mayor to sign a professional services agreement with Tripepi Smith for communication services for Fiscal Year 23-24 in an amount not to exceed $72,000.

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

DISCUSSION
Tripepi Smith has been providing and managing the City's communication services since February of this year, when the Police Administrative Services Manager/Public Information Officer resigned. These services have included content planning, management and response for the City's various communications channels (primarily social media, but also City websites).Tripepi Smith engages all City Departments on a monthly basis via a newly-reconstituted City Communications Team to accomplish this, and collaborates closely with designated City staff to plan content, communicate new issues or concerns, and generate City information for sharing with the public. In addition, Tripepi Smith monitors City social media channels for questions and comments seven days a week, responding when appropriate with guidance from City staff. Using Tripepi Smith has allowed the City to benefit from a dedicated industry-leading content management, messaging, story telling and communications firm using best practices.

The better the City communicates, the better the public is served. Authorizing an agreement with Tripepi Smith within Fiscal Year 23-24 will allow the City to continue to improve its messaging and responses with better content and professional oversight. A monthly dashboard metrics report will be furnished to the City as part of the monthly retainer fee. Other optional services are available through Tripepi Smith at additional charge, should the City need. Optional services include news articles, press releases, official statements, digital newsletters, photoshoots, video production, graphics and more.

A contract is not attached to this agenda report. Tripepi Smith will be using the standard City agreement.

OPTIONS
PGCC 6-7-2023

1. Take no action.

2. Provide alternate direction.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Funding for the professional services agreement with Tripepi Smith for communication services has been budgeted within the proposed draft Fiscal Year 23-24 budget.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.

Attachments
Tripepi Smith Proposal
PGCC 6-7-2023

Proposal submitted for:

COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
Submitted: May 18, 2023
By: Ryder Todd Smith, Co-Founder & President
Cameron Grimm, Director
Skyler Addison, Business Analyst
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER LETTER ....................................................................................................................... 3 PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES.......................................................................................... 4 COST PROPOSAL ................................................................................................................... 7 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 12 COMPANY OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 15

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
3 COVER LETTER

Thank you for the opportunity to continue our relationship with the City of Pacific Grove as its communications partner. Our professional, highly trained team of public affairs, marketing and creative experts is well-positioned to continue helping the City execute on its strategic communications goals and objectives.

Since February, Tripepi Smith has worked with the City to improve communications processes, offer insight on outreach for upcoming projects and initiatives and establish best practices related to social media and general communications. The City has also utilized Tripepi Smith’s ad hoc offerings relating to press release creation and graphic design services.

Work with the City over the past 3 months has provided insight into the scope of work that would be most beneficial to the City and staff moving forward. The proposed scope is outlined in this proposal.

Tripepi Smith has a strong record of working with public agencies throughout California.

This work includes graphic design, marketing plans, media relations, strategic messaging, social media management, crisis communications and community engagement.

Tripepi Smith is a force multiplier for the communication operations in cities across California, actively working with over 100 city governments and public agencies. We gain insights from the breadth of our work and share that knowledge with our clients. No other communications firm has the city client depth and diversity that Tripepi Smith offers. We leverage this experience to the benefit of each client, applying experiences and lessons learned.

We appreciate the opportunity to continue to serve the Pacific Grove community and look forward to collaborating with the City on its communications efforts.

Regards,
Ryder Todd Smith
Co-Founder & President
Tripepi Smith
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
4 PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
After an initial engagement with the City of Pacific Grove, Tripepi Smith has developed an understanding of the communication needs that drive its strategy. The following custom scope of work is built upon those needs and the work Tripepi Smith has been most involved with over the previous contract term.

An updated scope of work for a renewed retainer agreement is outlined below. As with the previous contract, any ad hoc requests beyond the retainer can be handled through our standard hourly rates.

Ongoing Support
Every-Other-Week Check-In Calls & Content Planning
To coordinate our efforts with City Staff and sustain momentum on projects, Tripepi Smith will continue with a recurring, one-hour every-other-week phone call that will include a designated lead for our engagement. These calls will help drive content planning for various communications channels, including website articles, press releases and social media posts and stories. Call content will focus on story plans, new issues or concerns that need to be communicated, identification of major themes or ideas to address in the coming weeks, review of recent media mentions and social media comments and sharing of communication opportunities uncovered. This will be a working call, during which Tripepi Smith will manage an agenda and provide notes for each call. After each call, the client will receive an action summary email about decisions made on the phone call and related action steps. We will produce work, such as press releases and social media drafts, in a shared workspace where the City can see our progress in real-time and provide instant feedback as needed. These tools allow for enhanced collaboration and expedite the production process.

Social Media Management
Content Creation: Social media content creation involves: planning, fact-checking, sourcing graphics, grammar checking and scheduling the post. Tripepi Smith will create up to three posts a week (12 posts a month) and distribute them on up to four (4) platforms (e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Nextdoor).

Monitoring: Tripepi Smith will monitor inboxes for questions and comments seven days a week. When appropriate, responses will be drafted, which will occasionally require factchecking and seeking out guidance from the City.

Additional: Our work also includes optimizing social media accounts to boost performance and keeping up to date on the latest social media platform updates and options. Boosted posts and targeted ads are also helpful in disseminating information to community PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
5 members, and Tripepi Smith is fully capable of running and tracking these paid campaigns (fees to be agreed upon and paid by the City).

Monthly Dashboard Metrics Report
Each month, Tripepi Smith will provide a summary report in PDF format of the basic metrics (reach, posts, engagement, etc.) related to City-controlled social media. This will help us evaluate the success of our outreach efforts, as well as serve as an ongoing feedback mechanism for gathering valuable insights that can help inform ongoing communication strategy.

Communication Team Facilitation
Tripepi Smith will host, organize and document a monthly meeting that involves the City Communications Team. The team, which consist of designated communicators from each department, will work to develop stories and social media content to support overall City communications. Tripepi Smith’s role will be to mentor, document and organize the input of this team into the overall City communications. Meetings will be similar in format to the bi-weekly meetings conducted with the City manager or his designee in terms of the technology used. Meetings will be held virtually using Zoom or MSFT Teams. A written agenda and documentation of notes and discussion from the meeting will be created by Tripepi Smith.

Common Add-On Work
News Articles, Press Releases & Official Statements
Tripepi Smith can draft news articles, press releases and/or official statements, which are typically up to five hundred (500) words in length. The City would direct the allocation of stories with Tripepi Smith’s suggestions, making internal subject matter experts available to aid the development of the stories when needed. Additionally, this assumes the City would provide a media and external agencies notification list for use by Tripepi Smith where a press release scenario is desired. The City would also facilitate timely approval of quotes in the release when connected with City Staff.

Quarterly Digital Newsletter
Tripepi Smith has email marketing design experts with access to the complete Adobe Creative Suite to make any Constant Contact email template stand out. We will create one email template inside of Constant Contact for quarterly newsletter use. Email is another avenue to distribute the news article content that is created every month; it’s inexpensive, prevalent and a solid way to reach engaged residents. We can utilize existing email lists collected from the City.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
6 Quarterly Photoshoot
Assumes a six-hour event, with one-hour pre-planning, travel time, post-shoot photo editing, delivery to client photo portal. This includes all equipment fees – except drone work – and uses a Senior Graphic Artist / Photographer to complete the work.

Video Production
Assuming that Tripepi Smith handles all work and the video involves scripting, use of teleprompter, full camera setup, a single day of production shooting, b-roll shooting on same day, pre-planning, post-production video editing, music licensing, voice over, transcription and upload to appropriate channels.

Graphics
Tripepi Smith uses Canva extensively for basic social media graphics and therefore can use our Junior Business Analyst resources for that work. Where more extensive design is required, Tripepi Smith has an Art Director, Senior Graphic Artists and Graphic Artists. In our experience, these costs can vary widely based on iteration count, number of pages of content to layout or desired number of logo options or extent of a particular branding process. In all cases, we assume written content is being provided; this estimate is for design costs only.

Other
Sometimes we cannot anticipate all the potential needs of an agency when making a proposal. In these cases, Tripepi Smith can either provide a fixed price quote for work, or an estimate using our time and materials rates noted below.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
7 COST PROPOSAL
Ongoing Support
This is usually priced into a fixed monthly retainer basis with a defined scope of services.

Pricing would be as follows for a theoretical retainer scope of:
• every-other-week call,
• three media posts a week plus seven day a week monitoring, • monthly dashboard metrics report, and
• facilitated and documented monthly City Communications Team meeting. $6,000 / month invoiced on 15th of each month
Add-On Work Rough Estimates
Additional News Article/Press Release
Up to 500 words. ~$650
Quarterly Digital Newsletter
Costs vary heavily by content generation requirements and formatting needs. For a Constant Contact account setup and custom art template, the fee will be about $825. For ongoing newsletter assembly, excluding content development, fees are likely $600/month.

Quarterly Day Long Photoshoot
Approximately $2,680 / not including travel costs
Video Production
Approximately ~$4,940 / video not including travel
Graphics
Print/Digital Short Format Quarterly Newsletter - $850
Print/Digital Banner - $725
Print/Digital Flyer - $950
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
8 Time & Materials (Ad Hoc) Work
Tripepi Smith’s standard hourly rates (listed below) will be available to the City for any services provided.

Retainer Discounted Time and Materials Rates
When client monthly retainers exceed six-thousand-five-hundred dollars ($6,750) a month, they have access to our reduced Hourly – Retainer rates noted below. Otherwise, any ad hoc work done outside the scope of the Retainer would be at the Hourly – Standard rates.

Title Hourly - Standard Hourly - Retainer
Principal $350 $295
Director $240 $215
Art Director $240 $215
Senior Business Analyst $190 $165
Business Analyst $130 $110
Junior Business Analyst $105 $90
Senior Videographer/Animator $190 $165
Senior Photographer $160 $135
Senior Graphic Designer $175 $145
Graphic Designer $120 $100
Junior Graphic Designer $105 $90
Web Developer $195 $165
Drone Operator $195 $165
Videographer/Photographer $120 $100
Time and Materials Billing
Any requested ad hoc work will be invoiced at the end of the month in which the work was done. Terms are net 30 days.

Fixed price project work will be invoiced per the above noted payment schedule. This will also be net 30 days.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
9 Time & Materials Billing Increments
For ad hoc work, time at Tripepi Smith is billed in 15-minute increments – i.e. we invoice our time in the following examples: 1.25, 0.75, 4.0 or 6.5 hours.

Annual Increase
Tripepi Smith will increase the hourly rates and retainer fees for all resources by five percent (5%) or the “West Region” Consumer Price Index (CPI)—whichever is higher—each year on the anniversary of the contract, starting in calendar year 2024. When the contract duration is less than one year, new rates will be negotiated with each new contract renewal period.

Other Costs
Because Tripepi Smith offers a broad set of services, including extensive content production, we have some other content production-related fees that may come up during our engagement that we want to tell you about.

Travel Costs
Travel costs must be pre-authorized and then will be reimbursed by the City for any requested travel. Travel costs to be covered are for airfare, lodging and car rental. If Tripepi Smith is requested to be onsite, we will invoice for travel time at half rate of the resource’s applicable Hourly Rate.

Equipment Costs
Tripepi Smith offers some services that require equipment, such as drone operations and video production. As such, in those cases, the following rates apply:

Title Half Day Full Day
Video Equipment $400 $600
Drone Equipment N/A $500
• Six-hundred dollars ($600) for a full day of video equipment use (includes full set of video equipment).

Full day is defined as a shoot lasting four (4) or more hours. • Four-hundred dollars ($400) for a half day of video equipment use. Half day is defined as anything under four (4) hours of video production. All such expenses will be authorized by the City prior to fee being assessed.
• Five-hundred dollars ($500) per day drone fee applies and is not inclusive of the drone operator time (Drone Operator rate).

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
10 Service Fees
Typically, Tripepi Smith prefers to have service providers bill the client directly to avoid additional administrative costs and because we have no economic interest in the service provider selection. If Tripepi Smith is asked to pay the bill for the client, we will apply a ten percent (10%) agency fee to the reimbursement expense. Typical services include, but are not limited to:

Print Costs: Tripepi Smith is happy to use a printer of the client’s choosing for print production work, or to recommend a printer with whom we have experience.

Digital Advertising: Tripepi Smith is a Google Partner and Constant Contact Solution Provider and has Facebook Certified staff. We consider digital platforms to be a cornerstone element of any outreach strategy; often this comes with digital advertising fees.

Media Placement: Tripepi Smith can help liaise on behalf of the Town for advertising space within various mediums, such as newspapers, magazines or websites.

Voiceover, Translation and Closed Caption Fees: Tripepi Smith occasionally uses thirdparty resources to record voiceovers for videos, generate closed captions for videos, and for non-English language translations.

Tripepi Smith Partnership Discounts
Tripepi Smith has financial interest in certain related entities. These partnerships allow Tripepi Smith to offer clients extra media reach or additional services at partner pricing.

Partnerships include:

PublicCEO
– digital news about public affairs, reaching over 10,000 California government executives https://www.publicceo.com
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
11 Civic Business Journal
– digital interest stories about the people in local government https://www.civicbusinessjournal.com
FlashVote
– planning, implementing, measuring civic surveys
https://www.flashvote.com
TS Talent Solutions
– talent search services for local government and related agencies
https://www.tstalentsolutions.com/
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
12 REFERENCES
Description
City of Indian Wells
Chris Freeland
City Manager
760.346.2489
[email protected]
44950 Eldorado Dr, Indian Wells, CA 92210
On-demand crisis communications, platforms review, policy strategy expertise, graphic design, content production support, video production support, event management and facilitation, photography services, media outreach, social media
management, communications and leadership strategy, metric reporting, website content updates, copywriting services and quarterly communications calendar planning.

Primary Assigned Personnel:

Cameron Grimm, Director
Kaetlyn Hernandez, Business Analyst
Olivia Moore, Junior Business Analyst
Period: 2018 to present
City of Culver City
Shelly Wolfberg
Asst. to the City Manager
310.253.6008
[email protected]
9770 Culver Blvd, Culver City, CA 90232
Communications Assessment, strategy and action items, social media management, social media and media monitoring,
ongoing communications support, videography, monthly
metrics reporting, photography, graphic design, bi-weekly client calls and crisis communications.

Primary Assigned Personnel:

Jon Barilone, Principal
Saara Lampwalla, Senior Business Analyst
Kaetlyn Hernandez, Business Analyst
Claire Torza, Junior Business Analyst
Period: 2017 to present
City of Duarte
Dan Jordan
City Manager
626.590.4633
[email protected]
1600 Huntington Drive, Duarte, CA 91010
Tripepi Smith conducted a full communications assessment for the City of Duarte in 2014. After ad hoc video, photo and email outreach work over a few years, the City engaged Tripepi Smith in 2020 to refresh the 2014 communications assessment,
create a style guide, consult in creating a new website and to redesign its quarterly newsletter. Additionally, the City entered a retainer agreement for social media services, writing news articles and press releases, updating the website, delivering monthly metrics reports, conducting weekly project
management calls as well as quarterly strategy calls with leadership and to produce the quarterly newsletter.

Primary Assigned Personnel:

Saara Lampwalla, Senior Business Analyst
Danielle Rodriguez, Business Analyst
Claire Torza, Junior Business Analyst
Period: 2014 to present
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
13 City of La Cañada Flintridge
Arabo Parseghian
Deputy Director of Administrative Services
818.790.8880
[email protected]
One Civic Center Dr., La Cañada Flintridge, CA 91011
Communications assessment, and on-demand communications support. Community newsletter generation, media relations management, videography and strategic message
development.

Primary Assigned Personnel:

Cameron Grimm, Director
Kjerstin Wingert, Senior Graphic Artist
Period: 2016 to present

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
14 Certificates of Insurance
Insurance certificates will be provided prior to contract execution. Tripepi Smith routinely provides insurance certificates to prove we meet the contracting requirements of public agencies throughout California. We are willing and able to comply with the insurance requirements of the City.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
15 COMPANY OVERVIEW
Tripepi Smith excels at public affairs. We work in a complex environment where successful communications go hand-in-hand with marketing and technical expertise. As a full-service public affairs and creative services firm, Tripepi Smith delivers strategy, outreach and design tailored for local government, public agencies, nonprofits and private companies— each strongly represented in our client list.

At Tripepi Smith, experienced Directors and Analysts drive strategy and implement messaging. Full-time creative professionals generate compelling branding, websites, design, social media, photography and video. The collaboration between Creative Services and Analysts keeps communications engaging and on-message, and a diversity of skillsets and expertise allows Tripepi Smith to offer clients exactly the level of service they need.

Additionally, printing, niche website development needs or for mailing, we may use subcontractors. These are often determined at the time of the need, so it is difficult to predict who that will be. However, here is a list of potential firms or people we routinely subcontract with:

InfoSend – Print and Mail House Services
DLS Printer Services – High-end Printing for Collateral Emily Baker – Voiceover Work
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
16 Grounded in civic affairs: Co-founder
and CFO Nicole Smith is a 2ndgeneration civic affairs professional (her father was a city manager for 30 years).

Meanwhile, co-founder and president of
Tripepi Smith, Ryder Todd Smith, brings
over a decade of public agency
marketing and communications
experience to the table.

Legal Structure and Financial Matters
Tripepi Smith is a California S
Corporation. Ownership is equally split
between Co-Founders Nicole D. Smith
and Ryder Todd Smith.

Tripepi Smith has been incorporated
since 2002 and has generated a profit every year it has been in operation. We have never had a legal claim filed against us and have never failed to fulfill a contract commitment.

Implementing Strategy and Engaging Audiences
Tripepi Smith recognizes the important interplay of public affairs and design. It’s about presenting ideas that advance communities and public institutions. An important corollary to this is providing the creative services that can build materials to engage audiences and make ideas resonate. Tripepi Smith’s multi-faceted design team enables us to reach these goals and lead effective creative strategy.

Strategic
Tripepi Smith is a provider of technology, communications and public affairs services. We leverage our skills and experiences in each of these areas to deliver efficient, technologically driven communication solutions that reflect our deep understanding of local government. Our team has a strong record of working with public agencies, joint
powers authorities and not-for-profit organizations throughout California to better engage and connect with their stakeholders and community.
“…solutions that reflect
our deep understanding
of local government.”
PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
17 Creative
Tripepi Smith’s creative professionals have worked with public and private clients on imagery, colors and graphic design in an array of projects. Our firm offers creative services that address not only traditional media such as print, websites, logo design and advertising but also non-traditional marketing services around email campaigns, social media, blogging, SEO, video production and more. This integrated approach to content development makes the process more efficient and more effective for clients.

Content x Distribution = IMPACT
Tripepi Smith was born in the digital era and brings significant technical skills to the table.

Members of our team carry technical certifications in Hootsuite Social Media Marketing, Facebook Blueprint, Google Advertising, Google Analytics and Twitter Flight School, among others. We take digital platforms seriously and recognize how critical it is to not only develop great visuals and messaging, but to ensure the audiences we want to reach actually see that content. Without content distribution, there is no impact.

PGCC 6-7-2023

City of Pacific Grove / Communications Services / V2
18 Services Offered
Strategy, Marketing, Communications
Strategic development, research, surveys,
messaging
Social media management
Web and social media strategy, optimization
(SEO), metrics
Web hosting and support
Email campaigns
Relations (media, stakeholders, public,
government)
Support and training for events, presentations
and virtual gatherings
Google AdWords, LinkedIn and Facebook
advertising
Creative Services
Full-service graphic design for digital, print and
outdoor
Brand and logo development
Content generation, writing and editorial
Output services (digital distribution, print
management, mail management)
Photography, illustration and information
graphics
Video and animation
Web design and implementation
PGCC 6-7-2023