CITY OF PACIFICA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck
Mayor pro Tem Sue Vaterlaus
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Christine Boles
City Council Regular Meeting 1 March 27, 2023
SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETING
March 27, 2023 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Off-street parking is allowed by permit for attendance at official public meetings.
Vehicles parked without permits are subject to citation. You should obtain a permit from the rack in the lobby and place it on the dashboard of your vehicle in such a manner as is visible to law enforcement personnel.
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES DURING MEETING
Alternative Ways to Observe and Participate in the Meeting:
The primary method for observing and participating in the meeting is in-person at the meeting location published in the meeting agenda. However, there are alternative ways to observe and participate:
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • Watch on TV on Comcast channel 26
• Watch a Live Stream of the meeting by following https://www.cityofpacifica.org/LiveStream or www.pacificcoast.tv
• Live Remote Public Comments (offered on a pilot basis):
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • OR Dial-in: 1-669-900-6833 | Webinar ID: 811 5615 8241 o Press * 9 to raise your hand to request to speak.
o Press * 6 to unmute when called upon to speak by the last 4-digits of your phone #. • When the Mayor announces the Agenda Item on which you would like to comment, raise your hand in Zoom. You will be called upon my screenname or last 4-digits of phone number if dialing in. Please mute any background sound and state your full name at the start of your comment.
Please note that Alternative platforms for participation are subject to underlying technology functionality and may be modified or interrupted at any time without notice. • Written Public Comments:
BEFORE THE MEETING: Written public comments may be submitted in advance by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date by email to: [email protected]. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
• Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public Comment on Item Not on Agenda” in the Subject Line
• Include the submitter’s full name
Written public comments received by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date will be provided in their entirety to the City Council and posted to the City’s website prior to the meeting but will not be read verbally at the meeting.
AT THE MEETING: Materials in writing provided at the meeting should provide seven (7) copies to provide for each Councilmember, City Clerk and City staff.
City Council Regular Meeting 2 March 27, 2023
6:15 PM - CLOSED SESSION
00a. Conference with Real Property Negotiations (Government Code § 54956.8).
Property: 1220 Linda Mar Boulevard, Pacifica California. Agency Negotiation: Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager and Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney. Negotiating Parties:
North Coast County Water District. Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment for Right of Entry Agreement.
7:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Roll Call
Reading of Land Acknowledgment
The City of Pacifica acknowledges that we occupy the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. We honor the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples for their enduring commitment to Mother Earth. As the Indigenous protectors of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. We affirm their sovereign rights as First Peoples and wish to pay our respects to the ancestors, elders, and relatives of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples.
Salute to the Flag led by Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus
Closed Session Report
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation - Beth Phipps Retirement
CONSENT CALENDAR
Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council on any item listed on the agenda should submit a speaker card to the City Clerk.
Items on the consent calendar will be adopted by one motion unless a Councilmember requests, before the vote on the motion, to have an item discussed. Time limit on comments is three minutes or less.
1. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting held on March 13, 2023.
2. Ratification of Proclamation of Local Emergency related to March 2023 Storm Events PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution ratifying the Proclamation of Local City Council Regular Meeting 3 March 27, 2023
Emergency related to March 2023 Storm Events by the City Manager acting as Director of Emergency Services issued on March 23, 2023.
3. Resolution approving the contract amendment with Regional Government Services for financial and system implementation consulting services.
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to extend the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Regional Government Services (RGS) for Financial Services at the estimated additional cost of up to $179,590 to cover additional services related to implementation of the new Financial and Human Resources ERP system.
4. Resolution approving the contract amendment with Regional Government Services (RGS) for Economic Development consulting services.
PROPOSED ACTION: Approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to extend the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Regional Government Services for Economic Development services at the estimated additional cost of up to $65,000 to cover services through the next fiscal year.
5. FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving the Construction Contract with Mercoza in an amount not to exceed $203,279.50 and a Master Services Agreement and Task Order No. 1 with Wilsey Ham in an amount not to exceed $65,120.00; Authorize a budget authority in the amount of $308,659.50, which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the Construction Contract amounts; Authorize staff to Execute Future Change Orders and Task Orders not to exceed the contingency amount; and Authorize the Designated Personnel to Sign Contract Documents related to the FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project.”
6. FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving the Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. in an amount not to exceed $1,568,829.20 and a Master Services Agreement and Task Order No. 1 with CSG Consultants, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $149,360.00; Authorize a budget authority in the amount of $1,975,917.00, which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the Construction Contract amounts; Authorize staff to Execute Future Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount; and Authorize the Designated Personnel to Sign Contract Documents related to the FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project.”
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
This portion of the Agenda is available for the public to address the City Council on any issue that is not on the Agenda. Any person wishing to address the Council shall be recognized by the Mayor during this time, provided, however, that only items not on the agenda for that meeting may be addressed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body and not to any member thereof. Councilmembers shall not enter into debate with speakers under Public Comments on Items Not on the Posted Agenda. A maximum time of three minutes will be allowed for any speaker. Persons addressing the City Council Regular Meeting 4 March 27, 2023
City Council shall adhere to time limits and not disrupt the conduct of the meeting, and not make threats against any person or the public order. The Mayor, or their designee, may remove or cause the removal of an individual for disrupting the meeting, after providing the necessary warning pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.95 with confirmation from the City Attorney that removal is appropriate.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Council Communications is for Councilmembers to inform each other of items of potential interest to other Councilmembers, such as interagency meetings.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Staff Communications is for the City Manager to offer announcements as appropriate.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.
CONSIDERATION
7. Accept Final Report, List of Opportunities & Timing of the Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study.
PROPOSED ACTION: Receive and accept the Final Report and List of Opportunities & Timing of the Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study.
8. Pacifica Police Department's First Annual RIPA Report PROPOSED ACTION: Receive the Pacifica Police Department's first annual Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) Report.
9. Process and timeline for review of Commission and Committee Charters PROPOSED ACTION: Discuss and provide direction to the City Manager about the process and timeline for review of Commission and Committee Charters.
10. Midyear Budget Review and Adoption of Resolution to Adjust the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget.
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the midyear FY 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget adjustments.
ADJOURN
NOTICE: If you challenge a city's zoning, planning or other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Judicial review of any city administrative decision may be had only if a petition is filed with the court not later than the 90th day following the date upon which the decision becomes final. Judicial review of environmental determinations may be subject to a shorter time period for litigation, in certain cases 30 days following the date of the final decision The City of Pacifica will provide assistance for disabled citizens upon at least 24 hours advance notice to the City Manager’s Office (650) 738-7301, or send request via email to:
City Council Regular Meeting 5 March 27, 2023
[email protected] if you need sign language assistance or written material printed in a larger font or taped, advance notice is necessary. All meeting rooms are accessible to the disabled.
The Pacifica Municipal Code is available online at the City’s website (www.cityofpacifica.org/municode);
HOW TO OBTAIN CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS
Posted agendas:
Agendas are posted no later than Friday prior to the City Council meeting date, at the entrance to the City Hall location at the Pacifica Community Center, 540 Crespi Drive.
View on the Internet:
Follow the link to Council agenda, at www.cityofpacifica.org E-mail subscription:
Send a request to Sarah Coffey, at [email protected] City Clerk’s Office/City Manager’s Office
City Hall, 540 Crespi Drive
Council meetings:
Agendas are available at the City Council meeting
HOW TO REACH YOUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
• Governor Gavin Newsom, State Capitol Building, Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 445-2841 • State Senator Josh Becker, 1528 So. El Camino Real, Suite 303, San Mateo CA 94402 (650) 212-3313 • Assembly Member Marc Berman, 721 Colorado Ave, Suite 101, Palo Alto CA 94303 (650) 324-0224 • Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, 698 Emerson Street, Palo Alto CA 94301 (650) 323-2984 • Senator Alex Padilla, B03 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3553 • Senator Dianne Feinstein, #1 Post Street, Suite 2450, San Francisco CA 94104 (415) 393-0707 • President Joseph R. Biden, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC 20500
CITY COUNCIL
• Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck, tbigstyck@ pacifica.gov
• Mayor pro Tem Sue Vaterlaus, [email protected]
• Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer, [email protected]
• Councilmember Mary Bier, [email protected]
• Councilmember Christine Boles, [email protected]
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to approve the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting held on March 13, 2023.
STAFF CONTACT:
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Move to approve the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting held on March 13, 2023 (Attachment A).
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ORIGINATED BY:
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (PDF) 1 Packet Pg. 6
CITY OF PACIFICA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck
Mayor pro Tem Sue Vaterlaus
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Christine Boles
City Council Regular Meeting 1 March 13, 2023
REGULAR MEETING
March 13, 2023 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck called the meeting to order on March 13, 2023 at 7:05 PM 7:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Bigstyck called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Tygarjas Bigstyck Mayor Present
Sue Vaterlaus Mayor pro Tem Present
Sue Beckmeyer Councilmember Present
Mary Bier Councilmember Present
Christine Boles Councilmember Present
City Clerk Coffey took a verbal roll call.
Staff Present: Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager; Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney; Lisa Petersen, PW Director; Christian Murdock, Planning Director; Chris Clements, Acting Police Chief; Eddie Pastrano, Collection System Manager-Wastewater Div.; Anthony Schriver, PB&R Recreation Supervisor; Ken Fong, IT Analyst; Elizabeth Brooks, Management Analyst; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk.
Reading of Land Acknowledgment
Mayor Bigstyck read the Land Acknowledgement.
Salute to the Flag led by Councilmember Boles
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Bigstyck asked Council if anyone wanted to pull an item from the Consent Calendar and, seeing no one, opened public comments. Also seeing no one, he closed public comments.
1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 2 March 13, 2023
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
SECONDER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles
1. Approval of Disbursements for Dated 02/01/23 through 02/28/23.
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve attached lists of disbursements for 02/01/23 through 02/28/23.
2. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes of the City Council Special and Regular Meeting held on February 27, 2023.
3. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the End of Beach Boulevard.
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.
4. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station.
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept Report and Make a Determination that Conditions of Local Emergency Continue to Exist at the Anza Pump Station at the Pacifica State Beach.
5. Termination of Proclamation of the Existence of Local Emergency Regarding Novel (new) Coronavirus ("COVID-19”).
PROPOSED ACTION: (1) Adopt a Resolution Terminating the Proclamation of the Existence of Local Emergency Regarding Novel (new) Coronavirus (“COVID-19”); and (2) Receive informational update on AB 2449 regarding remote (teleconference) participation in public meetings by members of the legislative body and update on utilizing AB 2449 for a member’s remote participation during public meetings.
6. Annual Part-Time Salary Schedule Update
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt the resolution approving the annual parttime salary schedule update that went into effect January 1, 2023.
7. Amendment No. 4 To Sublease Agreement between the City of Pacifica and the Art Guild of Pacifica
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to Adopt Resolution Approving Amendment No. 4 to Sublease Agreement between the City of Pacifica and the Art Guild of Pacifica (AGP). In addition to the Original Premises located at 1220 Linda Mar Boulevard, the AGP desires to lease the former Credit Union space, consisting of 770 rentable square feet located in the building on terms and conditions set forth within the amendment.
8. Contract with Maze and Associates for Auditing Services PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the attached resolution to authorize the City Manager to renew a contract with Maze and Associates Accountancy Corporation to provide
1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 3 March 13, 2023
financial audit services for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 through June 30, 2025, with an option to extend the agreement for an additional two years through the fiscal year ended June 30, 2027.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
Randy Berend, Pacifica, stated that he lived in Vallemar, and spoke about the beauty of it, and then expressed serious concerns about the negative results of falling trees, thus requesting that the city remove the trees.
Meghan Gallagher, Pacifica, stated she was an intern at Pacific Coast TV and reported on their open house on April 15, 1-5 p.m.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Boles attended the rotary and she and her husband presented best practices for construction of all electric energy-efficient homes. She attended the Leadership Council of San Mateo County training aspiring leaders for companies and non-profits in the county, and this was the first time for new Councilmembers. She referred to the goal setting meeting on Friday which helped them get to know each other and understand how they work, etc. She stated that Saturday’s meeting was great with many great comments from the public. She is still meeting with various department heads, recently with the Police Department. She mentioned that they use volunteer citizens to help them with paperwork, etc., and set up a neighborhood watch program to take away some burden on the police with non-emergency things. She met with Kathleen Wentworth from the San Francisco Airport Roundtable who is a former pilot and worked with Jackie Speier on airport noise. She stated that they are going to organize a 101 program to educate the public on airplane noise and the legal regulations, etc., and she will follow up with a session in Pacifica to help her understand our issues. She attended a meeting in Half Moon Bay after the Coastal Commission meeting, and she thought it was great to have the opportunity to meet them. She attended a Senior Services lunch with Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus. This was her first event with all the seniors and she is amazed at what the community has done. She attended the Peninsula Clean Energy community action group and they talked about a new heat pump water heater turnkey program. She mentioned this program’s process for people to switch from gas to electric.
Mayor Bigstyck thought that was a good program, and he asked if she could tell him how expensive it was rewiring the electrical to get those heat pump water heaters.
Councilmember Boles stated that they used to need a 220 outlet and that was more difficult for houses with small electrical panels, but there are new ones coming out that work on 110 so having a regular outlet nearby would be enough. She then stated that she met with Josh Becker for the first time. They talked about climate bills that he is working on and housing bills.
She stated that he is a co-sponsor for SB4 which allow churches to develop affordable housing.
She was excited about the program, but she mentioned that affordable housing wants to be near public transportation and there is an exception (if you have one car share as part of the development). She didn’t think that would be enough to help those who can’t afford a car or can’t deal with traffic issues. They are making sure that CEQA review deals with hazards. She stated he is trying to learn about what cities think about what the state is forcing upon us with RHNA and how he can push back.
1.a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 4 March 13, 2023
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that they had a special meeting to interview applicants for commissions and committees. She attended a Smart Coast California meeting where they had a woman from the Coastal Commission speak and an attorney who works on projects up and down the coast. She said it used to be a realtor program and now it is a totally separate nonprofit organization. She attended Ryan Marquez’ going away party and the goal setting meetings. She attended the Terra Nova sports fundraiser at the Moose Lodge. After that, she attended Pacifica Trivia at Pedro Point Brewery which was put on by Pacifica locals. They said they normally have six people but they got it out and there were about 34 people. She attended the senior lunch which was fun. She stated that the CCAG’s legislative meeting met for the first time in person in San Carlos, when the trees were falling and they couldn’t drive on Skyline.
They talked about the current legislative items of which very few have been approved. She stated that, at their regular CCAG meeting, they were awarded $200,000 for the safe route to school program on their consent calendar and, on their agenda, there was $900,000 for the Paloma overcrossing which was unanimously approved. She stated that they said that the coastside barely gets the funding they have. She stated that they had a discussion about fiber and they are doing fiber down the whole bayside and they were excited to add the north which was Daly City and Brisbane and nothing here, so she spoke about that. She stated that one of the Councilmembers said that they were on the project to bring fiber into Pacifica because they thought it was the best place to take fiber. She stated that she knows AT&T has some fiber but to set up fiber for the roads and they could put up sign boards and they could be changed in a minute with the fiber. They could sync the signals and, if there is a fire truck coming, they can change the signals on the other side so people stop which could save a lot of lives. They said they would look into Pacifica for fiber.
Councilmember Bier thanked Mike O’Neill for sending them information about the FEMA funding deadline on March 16, so if they haven’t applied for the FEMA funding for this last round of emergency storms, she recommended they do that as soon as they can. She stated that the past few weeks have been difficult for her and she thanked councilmembers for understanding.
She had to miss the committee and commission interviews but she read through everything; she thought it was nicer to see them in person and is sad she missed the interviews. She stated both days of goal setting was great, and she was impressed with how much work they got through and she was looking forward to the next session where they can put some strategies down and see what they can plan for next many years. She attended the PRC board meeting.
She referred to sharing information on the Peninsula division of California League of Cities meeting with MTC and HCD next Wednesday. She stated that she knows Meghan, the intern for PCTV, and she was proud of her and thought she did a great job.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that the committee and commission interviews happened the night after their Council meeting and it was exciting to see the breadth of people across town applying for the positions. The next day, she attended the Beautification Advisory Committee meeting and she will have information coming forward about the beautification awards and they voted on that for a residential project and for commercial project. She stated that there would have been two work days on Palmetto but one scheduled for Saturday got pulled because of the weather. There is another coming up on March 25 and will coincide with CalTrans clean up California initiative which runs for ten days. They were able to get that on the map for Pacifica.
The next day, Sunset Ridge Read Aloud Day, is a great experience and fun to read and be a public figure with the kids which she enjoys. She referred to the two Council goal setting meetings which included Council and staff and stated that it was lots of good time well spent.
They had two facilitators, one a team building session on Friday, and Saturday at the Community Center was more of strategic planning approach looking at where they were headed in the next 5-10 years. She stated that there will be another session coming up soon in early
1.a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 5 March 13, 2023
April to finalize all that. She then met with constituents in Pedro Point and Sharp Park on the same day and she then attended the Coastal Commission meeting on the 8th held at the Oceana Hotel in Half Moon Bay. She stated that one intriguing item on that agenda was the short-term rental item for Half Moon Bay: their approach is different than Pacifica’s but it was interesting to note there were many of the same concerns and issues. She referred to Councilmember Boles’ mention of the tour of the Pillar Point Harbor West Trail living shoreline project. She stated that, to check it out, you have to go as if you are going to go to Maverick’s and there is a parking lot at the end of the curved road which is where the project will be put in and it had to do with an eroding path. It is a protected bay but is different than our shoreline and there was erosion and a very interesting process of installing cobble under the ground and lots of sand they had to dredge out of another part of the harbor and it was convenient that they could move it there. She stated that the Harbor Master Mr. Pruett said, with the weather we had, if they were ever going to go out, it would have happened over this last time, but it didn’t.
She stated that there was a brief reception at Old Princeton Landing, and it was a great opportunity to do some networking with Coastal Commission staff and other elected officials.
Councilmember Bier stated that she found the information. She said she was on the executive committee of California League of Cities Peninsula Division and she would like to invite them to an hour-long webinar “Beyond the Housing Element” with resources, ideas and lessons for what is next; they could participate in a detailed presentation from MTC about the 6-cycle housing element and how many cities have submitted, what plans have been adopted, what does that all mean. She stated that it will be a jam-packed hour with the MTC and ACB both presenting which is on March 22 at noon. She stated that she forgot to mention the Youth Summit they are having on Saturday at Ingrid B. Lacy from 11:00-2:00, with youth-led workshops and focus groups, live podcast and tiktok corner. She stated it will be great.
Mayor Bigstyck stated his thoughts are with Ukraine. He attended the commission and committee interviews with fellow councilmembers. He was a liaison for the Pacifica Resource Center for their meetings every other month. He stated that they are just about fully staffed which was great news. He stated that they are underway implementing their updated strategic plan. He stated that lately their pantry shelves are largely bare and he suggested that anyone interested in donating food to the Pacifica Resource Center, it would be very welcome at this time. He stated that their annual fundraising event, Palmapalooza, will be in person for the first time since the pandemic. There will be more information on it soon, as well as their annual Mother’s Day card fundraiser. He attended the goodbye breakfast for Ryan Marquez; he stated it was sad to see him leaving but he wished him a lot of success. He went to Sunset Ridge for their read across America Day and had the opportunity to read the Sneetches by Dr.
Suess to Ms. Mooney’s kindergarten class. He then attended the team building for goal setting and strategic planning on the next day. He then has been wanting to know the Coastal Commissioners better and one of Josh Becker’s staffer thought he should have a chat with Charles Lester which he found informative in terms of getting background on the history of the Commission, and then he attended the meeting in Half Moon Bay. He stated that some revelations he took from that meeting was the Coastal Commission would prefer to be more involved in seeing more affordable housing developed along the coast and the streamlined process in the Coastal Act was taken out by the Mello bill in 1981. He found it interesting seeing efforts made on the state level to reenable them to help communities with the affordable housing component of their housing elements. He stated that they have lower staffing levels compared to what they would ideally have and it was interesting to watch their process and thinking about our similar process. He was interested in seeing them have their Half Moon Bay short term rental discussion. He stated that initially, Coastal Commission staff had recommended that the Commission allow 100 days for un-hosted short-term rentals when Half
1.a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 6 March 13, 2023
Moon Bay would have allowed 60 days for un-hosted short-term rentals. He stated that by the end of a thorough discussion, the Coastal Commission allowed Half Moon Bay to scale it back to 60 days. He met with various members the Coastal Commission staff, along with Commissioners, and enjoyed a tour of the Pillar Point Harbor project. He got to know one of the newer commissioners, Paloma Aguirre, Mayor of Imperial Beach, and thought it was fun connecting and trading stories and developing deeper relationships. He thought it might be nice to have a more person review with Kate Huckelbridge, their new director, and at that same time, Councilmember Beckmeyer was having a conversation with a staff member when he walked in the room and he thought it was an opportune moment to connect with both staffs. They had a nice meeting and he thought that our staff works very well with them. He thought our staffs will be working together on complex issues, such as the LCP, and they will let us know how it is going. He stated that some communication breaks down when they feel like they need more direction and they might come back to our staff. He enjoyed a housing element briefing with Councilmember Boles in preparation for the joint study session that will be happening next Tuesday.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Woodhouse had several communications of which some have been partly mentioned. He referred to the incoming storm of the next few days, and stated that they have predicted very high winds and they will have to continue dealing with downed trees and powerlines, as well as rain. He encouraged the public to stay in and safe. As a result, they had to make the decision that tomorrow night’s Manor overcrossing community meeting scheduled at Council Chambers is going to be postponed to a future date to be determined. He referred to the Housing Element Joint Study Session with Planning Commission and City Council on the 21st. He stated that on the consent calendar there was the termination of the COVID-19 pandemic emergency which was approved. He stated one detail is that they will be transitioning at the March 27 Council meeting to a hybrid zoom format for the meetings with certain restrictions. Regarding public comment, their audio phone-in system will be transitioning to the telephone and zoom format for audio comments. The City Clerk and team will be putting that information out as part of the agenda, etc. He thought that, in the past year, the zoom capabilities have come a long way and they were able to implement this first pilot phase and so suggested everyone be patient as they implement this new technology.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.
CONSIDERATION
9. Notice of Completion for Wastewater Collections System Smoke Testing FY 2022-2023 Project
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to Adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica accepting completion and directing the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Wastewater Collections System Smoke Testing FY 2022-2023 Project.
PW Director Petersen introduced Collection System Manager Eddie Pastrano and Total Flow, Inc. Consultant Jeff Blum who completed the work and were present to answer questions, and thanked PW Dep. Director Marina Aguilar, who is sick and not present at this time, for putting the presentation together. She then presented the staff report.
1.a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 7 March 13, 2023
Councilmember Boles thanked PW Director Petersen for the report. She asked if PW Director Petersen wasn’t surprised that there weren’t more places with the smoke with all the issues of I&I in this area as she thought 32 wasn’t very many and some were minor.
PW Director Petersen stated that it is best when they can find a smoking gun. She thought there were some limitations to smoke testing and discovering all the problems in the collection system. She stated that you won’t get all the problems in smoke testing, adding that Mr. Blum can correct her if she is wrong, but she understood that, if they have cracks in bottom of the pipe, that may be something that they won’t get smoke coming out if they have ground water getting into that crack.
Consultant Blum was a little surprised they didn’t find more as they usually find 2-3 catch basins. They did find one and that will need further investigation because the smoke came to that delayed and it was intertwined differently. He believes there are other issues as he is looking at a lot of the clean-outs that they saw: The standard clean-outs are so old and have holes and they need to be looked at and replaced and sealed around the inside. He stated that it was pretty much all the cleanouts in the whole city as that is the standard of what you have.
He stated that they didn’t have internal caps and the idea behind not having internal caps is that, if the main sewer line were to back up, most cities want the sewer line to burp outside of the house and not burp in the house and they don’t want to put a solid cap on that inner clean up to prevent infiltration coming in. He stated that they have some ideas on how they will work on that as a problem.
Councilmember Boles asked if the clean-outs are the responsibility of the homeowner, as it is not on city property.
Consultant Blum agreed.
PW Director Petersen pointed out that what Consultant Blum was talking about is that the cleanout caps are very old and have holes in them and could be acting as drains and throughout the city there may be 1,000 of them.
Consultant Blum stated that you can see the inside as it is not really sealed inside that crispy box and when ground water comes up in the winter time, the water will leech into that. He stated that it will give you a slow tail coming into the sewer system where the holes and the cover are going to give you a quick response. He stated, based on slow monitoring, you can tell what your problems are.
Councilmember stated that the neighborhood he mentioned where the sewer laterals were, where they were starting a project soon, some of the main sewers are undersized; she asked if that was right and not I&I, but managing the water flow in that area.
PW Director Petersen thought the main issue is I&I and she would ask Collection System Manager Pastrano if he is as familiar with this project. She believes that there aren’t too many, if any, that were upsizing.
Collections System Manager Pastrano stated most of the I&I was coming from the laterals and the city crew went out right after the rainfall and didn’t open up manholes. They could see the neighborhoods that were flowing with rainwater coming through and they knew there was a problem with I&I, just not a big contributor in finding the jackpot. Throughout the subdivision, there was I&I coming from each private lateral.
1.a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 8 March 13, 2023
PW Director Petersen thought they were talking about the collection system rehabilitation and replacement project, which they are coming through and going to redo their mainlines.
Collections system Manager Pastrano stated that it will be upsized because it needs both to do that and they already had plans to do that so it could take more capacity. That section was the one where they went by and looked in the I&I coming through those.
PW Director Petersen stated that they will have to get back to them on what is getting upsized as she doesn’t have that information now.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that a couple of these items were in townhouses and they don’t have their own separate laterals for each unit, and she asked what happens in those cases.
PW Director Petersen stated that they would have to be contacting the homeowners board, have a conversation with them on how that is managed. She thought it would typically be managed by the board and they would be having conversations with them related to that.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that it could be multiple units that are impacted.
PW Director Petersen responded affirmatively.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that one comment letter they received had a procedural question and he thought it would be interesting to learn about this particular administrative function. The question is why would the project remain open and staff would not be able to move forward with performing other smoke testing in other areas that have high I&I rates and should they not adopt the resolution.
PW Director Petersen stated that they won’t move forward until they have one project closed out, specifically if there are questions or concerns that Council is having related to how they are doing the smoke testing; if there is a reason they aren’t closing a project out, there is usually some sort of problem and they don’t want to move forward with another project and also having those same problems.
Mayor Bigstyck opened public comments and, seeing no one, closed no public comments.
Councilmember Bier thanked them for their work, adding that most of the questions she had were asked and answered. She stated that one concern she had was when they start to move forward with folks they will be working hand in hand with solutions, she was happy to hear that.
Mayor Bigstyck echoed Councilmember Bier’s gratitude for doing this work.
Councilmember Boles moved to adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica accepting completion and directing the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Wastewater Collections System Smoke Testing FY2022-2023 Project; seconded by Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus.
1.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 9 March 13, 2023
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Christine Boles, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor pro Tem
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles
10. Appointments to the Beautification Advisory Committee; Economic Development Committee; and Planning Commission
PROPOSED ACTION:
1) Move to appoint applicant(s) to the Beautification Advisory Committee for 3 full terms to expire March 2027;
2) Move to appoint an applicant to the Economic Development Committee for one partial term to expire October 2023;
3) Move to appointment applicant(s) to the Planning Commission for 2 full terms to expire March 2027.
City Clerk Coffey presented the staff report.
Mayor Bigstyck opened public comments and, seeing no one, closed public comments.
Mayor Bigstyck asked City Attorney Kenyon for their options on how they make the motion.
City Attorney Kenyon stated that what Council has done in the past was have deliberations and then they can get an idea of where the Council is going in terms of preferred candidates. There is no right way or wrong way, other than not do any secret balloting, and all five of them must do so.
City Clerk Coffey added that the lengths of the terms are all the same for the open positions so naming the applicants to appoint is sufficient.
Councilmember Beckmeyer suggested that they reappoint Gail Bennett and Julie Gossage as she has been working with the committee, seen the work they are doing and how that committee has come together. She remembers asking in the past that she didn’t know how long Julie Gossage has been on the committee and she asked the committee members before they were going to do the interviews if there was anything they were looking for and one thing that was loud and clear was a landscape architect and she has that qualification and is engaged in ongoing training, so that prompts her to nominate those two. She will let Council bring up other names.
Mayor Bigstyck stated he was impressed with all the candidates but, in particular, with Teresa Sulcer and Angela Perry, the latter of whom withdrew. He was impressed with the background that Teresa Sulcer brought to the table.
Councilmember Bier echoed what he said, i.e., all the people who come out are incredibly qualified candidates and we are so lucky to have such civically engaged people in our community and that spots open up all the time. If by chance they don’t get chosen at this time, she encourages them to come back again.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated it was so nice to see so many applicants because sometimes they only have the exact number of applicants for the positions. While they still interview them, they just place them in the positions, and sometimes they don’t place them in a position going forward.
1.a
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 10 March 13, 2023
Mayor Bigstyck stated that it was a happy occasion when this many people show up to participate in their community and he said to each one of them during the interviews that they reapply if they don’t get picked at this time. He asked if they had a discussion or a motion.
Mayor Bigstyck moved to appoint Gail Bennett, Julie Gossage, and Teresa Sulcer to the Beautification Advisory Committee each for full terms to expire March 2027; seconded by Councilmember Beckmeyer.
APPOINT GAIL BENNETT, JULIE GOSSAGE, AND TERESA SULCER TO THE
BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE EACH FOR FULL-TERMS TO EXPIRE MARCH 2027
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Tygarjas Bigstyck, Mayor
SECONDER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles
Mayor Bigstyck stated that the next is Economic Development Committee. He stated that it is difficult when the candidate doesn’t show up for the interview, knowing they want the spot.
Councilmember Boles added that the applicant did want to be there and she was stuck in traffic coming back from Sacramento, and it wasn’t a lack of desire, but she found it difficult as well.
She thought both candidates offer good skills. She would love to hear from those on the Economic Development Committee in terms of whether there are certain skills that they are looking for.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that it is another example of a committee that is really coalescing well and working well together, with a lot of energy, exuberance and interest in digging into data and creating events such as the Blues and Brews event. She felt having someone who would be a good team player and work well with the team is the biggest thing.
Councilmember Bier agreed, adding that there is a wide variety on the committee now which is nice as they represent different parts of the community. She thought it was good when someone understands what it’s like to be a business owner in town which is helpful, but not necessary, but more about the willingness and commitment.
Mayor Bigstyck gave a reminder that it was a partial term.
Councilmember Boles thought, because of that, it makes more sense that they met knowing that the other can still apply again and they have a chance to meet her.
Councilmember Beckmeyer moved to appoint L. J. Jones to the Economic Development Committee for the partial term to expire October 2023; seconded by Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus.
1.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 11 March 13, 2023
APPOINT L. J. JONES TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR THE PARTIAL TERM TO EXPIRE OCTOBER 2023
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor pro Tem
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles
Mayor Bigstyck stated that the Planning Commission is next. He stated that, having served with Lauren Berman, he felt she has been a fabulous chair and would like to reappoint her.
Councilmember Bier agreed with him.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated she would second that.
Councilmember Boles stated that she was also the only civil engineer in the group and, on the Planning Commission, it was helpful to have those skills to review the drawings and understand projects.
Mayor Bigstyck asked if they could show them the full breadth of options.
Councilmember Boles stated that Caitlin Quinn is a friend of hers, has been very active in the short-term rentals, has done a lot of work to research the issues and look at what other cities have done, and was super smart and well-spoken. She stated that she spoke with her about the fact that they already have two planning commissioners in Sharp Park that had to recuse themselves from the Sharp Park Specific Plan and she was concerned as there are other projects coming up in the area and that would take out too many commissioners, even though she would be terrific.
Councilmember Bier agreed that she would be great, adding that, when she spoke with her and said there was a spot coming up and she was right on it.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus thought they might need to take that into consideration in the future to make a map of where everyone is located so they don’t have huge issues with overlaps like this as it could cause a problem having three people in the same neighborhood and she reiterated that they need to take that into consideration and have a list of the other commissioners and where they are located.
Councilmember Beckmeyer asked the City Attorney, if they want to factor that into their deliberations, whether they would need to advertise that they are seeking a candidate not in a specific area.
City Attorney Kenyon stated that they would not, as the determination on who they are going to appoint is totally within the discretion of the Council; as long as their discretion is not used arbitrarily or capriciously, there should be no issue, and the fact that they are going to have several members on the same block that could present a problem in terms of conflict and that is a reasonable consideration to take into account when making appointments.
Councilmember Beckmeyer asked Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus if she was saying that, if they have an issue in Sharp Park, they might have to seek three recusals out of seven. In that setting,
1.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 12 March 13, 2023
she thought that all four would have to agree for a project to move forward or a decision to stand.
City Attorney Kenyon added that it would be to hear the item and act the item.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that often, when she was on the Commission, there were not seven present.
Councilmember Bier thought there should be, but she has noticed that in the past that there haven’t been as many present, especially during important issues that have come up. She wondered if other cities use the districting to recruit their committees and commissions.
City Attorney Kenyon stated that she has not heard about districting for Commission appointments but she advised on what she has seen in other communities where there are districts, noting that they have what would require a wholesale revamp of our code. They have had each district councilmember appoint a Planning Commissioner with approval of the full Council which is how they have dealt with districting, but she has never seen where the Commission appointees themselves must be from a specific district.
Councilmember Bier thought that will be a good part of their upcoming conversation one day.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that, regardless of geography, she wanted to say that Daniella Devine was a strong candidate as well and she thought from her breadth of experience and knowledge from the small business they run, and having worked with Planning Department on the other end, she had a good background for the purposes of what we need in terms of a Planning Commissioner.
Mayor Bigstyck agreed, adding that given her background, that tipped him a bit more in her direction over the other candidates and combined with the conversation on the realities of regionality, he thought she would be a good addition to the Planning Commission.
Councilmember Bier confirmed with Councilmember Boles that she spoke with Caitlin Quinn about her concerns.
Councilmember Boles responded affirmatively.
Councilmember Bier thanked her for doing that.
Councilmember Boles thought Daniella Devine’s experience of having gone through the process and expressed some frustrations are ideas she can bring back to try to improve the process and help educate homeowners. She stated that one question they don’t ask is whether they read drawings as not everyone does but she does as part of her work.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus originally chose Caitlin Quinn, but she thinks that, with the difficulties with regions and not having enough members present, she thought that would be a problem.
She will change her choice to Daniella Devine.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus moved to appoint Lauren Berman and Daniella Devine to the Planning Commission each for full terms to expire March 2027; seconded by Councilmember Beckmeyer.
1.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 13 March 13, 2023
APPOINT LAUREN BERMAN AND DANIELLA DEVINE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION EACH FOR FULL TERMS TO EXPIRE MARCH 2027
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor pro Tem
SECONDER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles
ADJOURN
Mayor Bigstyck adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m.
Transcribed by Barbara Medina, Public Meeting Stenographer.
Respectfully Submitted,
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
__________________________
Tygarjas Bigstyck, Mayor
1.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 03-13-2023 Regular Meeting (5306 : Approval of Minutes)
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Ratification of Proclamation of Local Emergency related to March 2023 Storm Events RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt a Resolution ratifying the Proclamation of Local Emergency related to March 2023 Storm Events by the City Manager acting as Director of Emergency Services issued on March 23, 2023.
STAFF CONTACT:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
(650) 738-7409
[email protected]
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION:
On March 23, 2023, the City Manager, acting in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed the existence of a local emergency pursuant to PMC 4-2.05(a) and executed the "Proclamation of the Existence of a Local Emergency" ("Proclamation").
The storm event that occurred on March 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 19 and 21, 2023 resulted in dangerous conditions and public safety concerns and caused damages all around the Bay Area. The events brought intense rainfall and high winds and wind gusts. The events required flood management; clearing of inlets and drainage swales; and removal of downed trees, branches and hanging limbs.
Public Works, Fire, Police Departments, and other essential services staff have been working diligently through the storm events to keep the public safe.
On January 3, 2023, San Mateo County Board of Supervisors declared a state of emergency and activated the County's Emergency Operations Center (EOC) to coordinate resources and communication with local, regional, and state agencies.
On March 14, 2023, California Governor Newsom expanded the previous storm state of emergency to cover the March storm events.
The County also advised that a local State of Emergency Proclamation would need to be made by impacted cities.
The Council's approval of this item will ratify the Proclamation of Local Emergency related to March 2023 Storm Events by the City Manager issued on March 23, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To be determined. The Proclamation of Local Emergency is a prerequisite for requesting state or federal assistance. The City will seek to recover expenses related to preparation, repair, and recovery from this storm event.
2 Packet Pg. 20
Pacifica City Council 2
March 27, 2023
ORIGINATED BY:
City Manager's Office
ATTACHMENT LIST:
ATTACHMENT A - Proclamation of a Local Emergency Related to the MAR 2023 Storm Events (PDF)
2 Packet Pg. 21
Pacifica City Council 3
March 27, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. __-2023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA RATIFYING THE
PROCLAMATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO THE MARCH 2023 STORM EVENTS
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.05 of the City of Pacifica Municipal Code ("PMC") designates the City Manager as the Director of Emergency Services; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 8630 and PMC section 4-2.05(a) empower the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the said City is affected or likely to be affected by an emergency, subject to ratification by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.02 of the PMC defines "emergency" as the "actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within this City caused by such conditions as earthquake, hazardous materials, plane crash, landslide, tsunami, epidemic, flood, riot, fire, or other conditions, including conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which conditions are or are likely to be beyond the capability of control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of this City, requiring the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat"; and WHEREAS, Section 4-2.01 et seq. of the Pacifica Municipal Code empowers the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City Council is not in session, subject to confirmation by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City of Pacifica caused by recent wet weather events, including flooding and damaging wind storms, occurring on March 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 19 and 21, 2023, at which time the City Council of the City of Pacifica was not in session; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has determined that wet weather events, including flooding and wind storms, threaten the health and safety of persons and properties, including critical public infrastructure, due to the risk of flooding and damaging winds requiring immediate attention and repair and, as such, constitutes an emergency pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 4-2.02 and Public Contract Code section 1102; and WHEREAS, such conditions are beyond the handling capability of the City's services, personnel, equipment, and facilities, requiring the use of outside contractors to conduct emergency repair pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 3-15.09 without giving notice for bids to let the contract, pursuant to Public Contract Code 22050; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2023, the City Manager, in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed the existence of a local emergency in the City of Pacifica after determining that wet weather conditions are likely to create conditions of disaster or 2 Packet Pg. 22
Pacifica City Council 4
March 27, 2023
extreme peril which will be beyond the services, personnel and equipment and facilities of the City; and such proclamation is attached hereto as Attachment A; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code section 8630 and PMC section 4-
2.05(a) the City Council must take action to confirm the proclamation within 7 days of the proclamation of local emergency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Proclamation of Existence of a Local Emergency, as issued by said City Manager in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, which is attached hereto as “Attachment A," is hereby ratified and approved by the City of Pacifica City Council;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said local emergency is confirmed to exist and shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council of the City of Pacifica;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that during the existence of this local emergency, the powers, functions, and duties of the Director of Emergency Services and the emergency organization of the City of Pacifica shall be those prescribed by state law, by the existing ordinances and resolutions of the City of Pacifica, as well as this resolution and any subsequent emergency orders of the City Council.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 27th day of March, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Tygarjas Twyrls Bigstyck, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 2 Packet Pg. 23
Pacifica City Council 5
March 27, 2023
Attachment A
2 Packet Pg. 24
2.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: ATTACHMENT A - Proclamation of a Local Emergency Related to the MAR 2023 Storm Events (5307 : Proclamation of Local
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Resolution approving the contract amendment with Regional Government Services for financial and system implementation consulting services.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to extend the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Regional Government Services (RGS) for Financial Services at the estimated additional cost of up to $179,590 to cover additional services related to implementation of the new Financial and Human Resources ERP system.
STAFF CONTACT:
Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
(650) 501-6004
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
RGS serves exclusively public sector agencies with its team of public sector experts to provide a customized solution to a variety of unique organizational needs.
The City entered into an agreement with RGS for Financial Services under the City Manager's authority in January 2022 to bring professional consulting expertise and provide technical services related to routine Financial Services activities, following the retirement of the City's tenured Finance Manager in December 2021. That vacancy created a significant gap in the City's already small Finance team, leaving holes in the Finance Department service level and institutional knowledge.
Due to continuing critical need for these services, as a result of recruitment challenges in filling the vacancy, the City Council approved the extension of this agreement with additional purchase authority of $30,000 in October 2022. In the meantime, the City had to open the Finance Manager recruitment multiple times until the position was reclassed to the Deputy Finance Director in FY 2022-23 budget, and subsequently filled a few months ago.
The services provided under the original contract were performed by Matt Pressey, who has extensive knowledge and years of experience serving and advising several California agencies on financial matters. include the annual audit assistance, preparation of journal entries, general ledger reconciliations and complex adjusting entries, bank reconciliations, quarterly closures, and reporting.
As the new Deputy Finance Director came onboard and other Finance Department vacancies are being filled, the scope of original work under this engagement is being gradually reduced and shifted towards the long-overdue project of ERP system selection and contract negotiation and preparation for the implementation of the new financial system.
As the City is now on the journey to have the new ERP system implemented in the next two 3 Packet Pg. 26
Pacifica City Council 2
March 27, 2023
years, there is a dire need for a deep knowledge and expertise to move forward the project and fulfill the project management role during the implementation.
The FY 2022-23 Adopted budget included allocation for a two-year limited term ARPA-funded Sr. Accountant position at $179,590 annual cost to help with the ERP implementation. Due to ongoing recruitment challenges and the highly unique expertise and skillset requirement for the job in both municipal accounting and systems implementation, the City was not able to fill this vacancy.
With RGS proven track record in financial management and systems implementation and Mr.
Pressey’s knowledge, expertise and familiarity with the City’s chart of accounts, general ledger and current accounting system, it is only fitting to reallocate the unused funds budgeted for the Senior Accountant position towards the RGS contract to ensure a smooth ERP implementation which is estimated to take at least 18 months.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The Council may choose not to approve the contract amendment and/or provide staff with alternative directions such as re-opening the recruitment for the Senior Accountant position.
However, exercising this option will result in delays in the ERP implementation and potentially lead to an increased backlog in the City's day-to-day financial operations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no FY 2022-23 fiscal impact associated with this action. The requested amendment is estimated at an additional $179,590 already budgeted for the full year of the fully burdened cost of the Sr. Accountant position that remains unspent. Reallocating these one-time funds towards the contract cost for a consultant who is already familiar with City’s financial structure and chart of accounts would set this project for success and will potentially result in savings compared to the cost of a two-year Sr. Accountant position.
ORIGINATED BY:
City Manager's Office
ATTACHMENT LIST:
3 Packet Pg. 27
Pacifica City Council 3
March 27, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2023
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES (RGS) TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL
CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO ERP IMPLEMENTATION
WHEREAS, the City has entered, under the City Manager's purchasing authority, into an agreement with RGS to assist the City with routine financial services, including bank reconciliations, quarterly and year-end closures, audit work, and preparation of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) due to several vacancies in the Finance Department; and
WHEREAS, the additional financial consulting services are needed to provide consulting services related to ERP implementation; and
WHEREAS, the FY 2022-23 Adopted budget includes unspent allocation due to the failed recruitment for a two-year limited term ARPA-funded Senior Accountant position created for the purpose of ERP implementation at a fully-burdened annual cost of $179,590; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, to authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary amendments to extend the existing contract with RGS and include additional services related to ERP system implementation, not exceeding the budget authority of $179,590.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 27th day of March, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Tygarjas Twyrls Bigstyck, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 3 Packet Pg. 28
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Resolution approving the contract amendment with Regional Government Services (RGS) for Economic Development consulting services.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to extend the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Regional Government Services for Economic Development services at the estimated additional cost of up to $65,000 to cover services through the next fiscal year.
STAFF CONTACT:
Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
(650) 501-6004
[email protected]
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION:
The City entered into an agreement with RGS for Economic Development Services under the City Manager's authority in September 2021 to bring professional consulting expertise and provide technical assistance related to the Economic Development activities. The services are being provided by Brian Moura, who has extensive knowledge, expertise and years of experience serving and advising several California public agencies on economic development matters. Also, Mr. Moura’s familiarity with Pacifica’s financial conditions, unique needs, organizational structure and key stakeholders, as per his previous engagement with the City on the Civic Center financing strategy, uniquely qualifies him to provide these services in the most efficient manner.
Under this agreement, RGS provided consulting guidance and advisory services in all functional areas of Economic Development, specifically on developing the scope and timeline for the Vision 2025 & Beyond Fiscal Sustainability Plan to achieve Pacifica’s future vision and fulfill the Council’s Strategic Goals related to Economic Development, as well as assistance with other economic development projects and initiatives as needed. The consulting services provided under this engagement are especially critical and valuable due to the City’s recruitment challenges in filling the Economic Development Manager position.
The City achieved significant Economic Development accomplishments while utilizing consulting services under this contract, including, but not limited to the following:
• developed components for the Vision 2025 project that contained analysis of financial sustainability and revenue enhancement strategies;
• completed Pacifica’s marketing study that included: Audience and Business research, Gap Assessment & Opportunities, and Marketing Campaign Concepts & Vision.
Launched the multi-year Marketing Plan with implementation of top two marketing opportunities earlier this year: Shop Pacifica eGift Card (driving more residents and visitors to shop at Pacifica Businesses), and Workcations in Pacifica (driving more 4 Packet Pg. 29
Pacifica City Council 2
March 27, 2023
occupancy at Pacifica Hotels);
• developed the project scope, prepared and managed RFP for the Economic Opportunities Study in Pacifica, and worked closely with the selected firm (Kosmont) to bring this project to completion with the final Economic Opportunities Study report being presented for Council’s acceptance as a separate agenda item tonight.
With the Economic Opportunities Study now moving into the implementation phase, it will require specialized project management expertise and focus that RGS can provide to this project.
It is critical for the City to continue utilizing the Economic Development Advisory services with RGS to continue staying on track with the Economic Development Program goals and objectives. The consultant will assist with the implementation of items listed in the short-term category of the Economic Opportunities Study and support other economic development projects and initiatives that are currently underway. It is important to highlight that the City currently does not have solely designated staff members or specialized in-house Economic Development expertise to provide these services, but we hope to be able to fill the Economic Development Manager position in the near future.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The Council may choose not to approve the contract amendment and/or provide staff with alternative directions. However, exercising this option will limit the staff’s ability to deliver on the Economic Development program goals and Council priorities.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY 2022-23 impact of this amendment is estimated at an additional $15,000 for the remainder of the fiscal year. If approved, the remaining $50,000 of the requested amount will be added to the FY 2023-24 Base Budget during the budget development process.
ORIGINATED BY:
City Manager's Office
ATTACHMENT LIST:
4 Packet Pg. 30
Pacifica City Council 3
March 27, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2023
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES (RGS) TO CONTINUE PROVIDING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Vision 2025 & Beyond Purpose Statement, defining the project as a strategic planning process to help envision Pacifica’s mid and longterm future; and WHEREAS, the City has entered, under the City Manager's purchasing authority, into an agreement with RGS to assist with Economic Development Program and further define the Vision 2025 & Beyond scope, including the economic development component of the project; and
WHEREAS, the Economic Opportunities Study, as a component of the Vision and Beyond project, is now completed and additional consulting services are needed for the implementation of the Study and other related economic development projects; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, to authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary amendments to extend the existing contract with RGS for additional economic development services, not exceeding the additional budget authority of $65,000.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 27th day of March, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Tygarjas Twyrls Bigstyck, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 4 Packet Pg. 31
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt the Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving the Construction Contract with Mercoza in an amount not to exceed $203,279.50 and a Master Services Agreement and Task Order No. 1 with Wilsey Ham in an amount not to exceed $65,120.00; Authorize a budget authority in the amount of $308,659.50, which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the Construction Contract amounts; Authorize staff to Execute Future Change Orders and Task Orders not to exceed the contingency amount; and Authorize the Designated Personnel to Sign Contract Documents related to the FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project.” STAFF CONTACT:
Raymund Donguines, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
(650) 738-3768
[email protected]
Roland Yip, P.E., DPW Deputy Director
(650) 738-3771
[email protected]
Lisa Petersen, P.E., DPW Director
(650) 738-3770
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On September 26, 2022, the City Council approved Task Order No. 1 between the City of Pacifica and NCE for Design and Engineering Services related to the FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project. The project will resurface streets generally in the Manor District and northern part of Pacifica. As part of the 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project, new ADA curb ramps must be installed within the limits of the project as specified in the City’s ADA Transition Plan and by Federal ADA law.
The FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project will install 25 new ADA-compliant curb ramps, repair sidewalks, curb and gutters and other miscellaneous related work within the limits of the pavement resurfacing work. The project will be funded by Measure W funds.
The Project was advertised on February 1, 2023, and February 8, 2023, in accordance with the formal bid process. Thirty-three (33) companies requested plans and specifications and ten (10) companies submitted bids. On February 23, 2023, the bid opening was held via Zoom by the City Clerk and the result is as follows:
5 Packet Pg. 32
Pacifica City Council 2
March 27, 2023
Company Bid
Mercoza $203,279.50
Rosas Brothers Construction $259,565.00
Villalobos and Associates Inc. $259,780.00
RK Engineering INC $283,778.00
Terocons Inc. $317,900.00
Kerex Engineering $368,300.00
FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. $461,853.00
golden bay construction, inc. $529,549.00
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $585,935.00
NBC Construction and Engineering, Inc. $789,749.30
The apparent low bidder is Mercoza with a bid amount of $203,279.50. All required documentation was submitted with their bid. Mercoza has performed several of the City’s projects in the past and their work has been satisfactory. As there are sufficient project funds approved as part of the FY 2022-2023 budget, the City Manager recommends the award of contract (Attachment "A") to the apparent low bidder, Mercoza. In addition, a 15% contingency is recommended to allow enough funding to handle any additional improvements that are identified during construction.
Wilsey Ham is on the City’s Consultant On-Call List and is a full-service engineering firm that specializes in local agency staff augmentation work including construction management and inspection work. Not only do they have the expertise in construction inspection and management for this type of project, but are also familiar with City standards. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between the City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (Attachment "B") for the construction management, inspections and material testing of this project in an amount not to exceed $65,120.00.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Council may choose not to adopt the resolution and not approve the construction contract.
However, this will result in project delays and possible increase in construction cost. Staff does not recommend this alternative action.
RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
Approval of the construction contract is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Stewardship of City Infrastructure: includes repairing/replacing outdated city facilities such as city hall, the libraries, fire stations, etc., improving streets, and responding to impacts of sea level rise. This construction project will improve the existing pedestrian network by installing ADA-compliant curb ramps.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The following is the source and use of funds for the project:
Total Project Source and Use of Funds
Measure W $ 543,000.00
Total Source of Funds $ 543,000.00
5 Packet Pg. 33
Pacifica City Council 3
March 27, 2023
FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project $ 308,659.50
Total Use of Funds $ 308,659.50
Project End Balance $ 234,340.50
The remaining funds will go back to Street Construction Fund 09 to fund FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project.
ORIGINATED BY:
Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza (PDF) Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (PDF)
5 Packet Pg. 34
Pacifica City Council 4
March 27, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING THE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH MERCOZA IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $203,279.50 AND A MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT AND TASK ORDER NO. 1 WITH WILSEY HAM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $65,120.00; AUTHORIZE A BUDGET AUTHORITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $308,659.50, WHICH INCLUDES CONTINGENCIES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED FIFTEEN PERCENT (15%) OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AMOUNTS; AUTHORIZE STAFF TO EXECUTE FUTURE CHANGE ORDERS AND TASK ORDERS NOT TO EXCEED THE CONTINGENCY AMOUNT; AND AUTHORIZE
THE DESIGNATED PERSONNEL TO SIGN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE FY 2023-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
WHEREAS, consistent with the City of Pacifica’s Bidding Procedures for Public Projects (Municipal Code Title 3 Chapter 15) the City of Pacifica advertised the Request for Bids for FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project on February 1, 2023, and February 8, 2023; and WHEREAS, the low bidder was Mercoza; and
WHEREAS, the City requested proposals from Engineering companies on the City’s OnCall List for the Construction Management, Inspection and Testing services; and WHEREAS, the City evaluated Wilsey Ham’s proposal, and is satisfied they can successfully complete the work and has been satisfied with their services on past City projects.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Governing Board of the City of Pacifica authorizes entering into the construction contract and agreement for the FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project and that the person/s who are listed below are authorized to sign the project contract documents for the Governing Board.
NAME TITLE SIGNATURE
Kevin Woodhouse City Manager _______________________
Lisa Petersen Director of Public Works _______________________ Roland Yip Deputy Director of Public Works _______________________ 5 Packet Pg. 35
Pacifica City Council 5
March 27, 2023
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 27th day of March, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Tygarjas Twyrls Bigstyck, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 5 Packet Pg. 36
CITY OF PACIFICA
540 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA 94044
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT
FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
DATE: MARCH 27, 2023
1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR:
CONTRACTOR: MERCOZA
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO: 988861 CLASS: A - General Engineering Contractor
2. SCOPE OF THE WORK
See Scope of Work attached as Appendix A.
COMPENSATION FOR WORK. Contractor’s total compensation for the Work performed under this Agreement (Contract Sum) is $203,279.50 to be paid as (check one): (1) lump sum; (2) lump sum with progress payments; (3) per attached schedule of rates and charges, up to a guaranteed not-to-exceed amount of $__________. All payments (check one): shall shall not be subject to a five percent (5%) retention.
3. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE WORK. Contractor shall commence and complete the Work by the following dates:
Commencement Date shall be on the date established in the Notice to Proceed. Owner reserves the right to modify or alter the Commencement Date of the Work.
Substantial Completion Date: Within 50 working days of Commencement Date.
Final Completion Date: Within 50 working days of Substantial Completion.
3.01 Liquidated Damage Amounts.
A. As liquidated damages for delay Contractor shall pay Owner Three Thousand Two Hundred dollars ($3,200.00) for each Day that expires after the time specified herein for Contractor to achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work, until achieved.
B. As liquidated damages for delay Contractor shall pay Owner Three Thousand Two Hundred dollars ($3,200.00) for each Day that expires after the time specified herein for Contractor to achieve Final Completion of the entire Work, until achieved.
3.02 Scope of Liquidated Damages
Contractor and Owner agree that because of the nature of the Project, it would be impractical or extremely difficult to fix the amount of such actual damages incurred by Owner because of a delay in completion of all or any part of the Work. Contractor and Owner agree that specified measures of liquidated damages shall be presumed to be the amount of such damages actually sustained by ATTACHMENT "A"
5.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project)
5.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23
-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTMERCOZA AGREEMENT– Page 3 Addresses for Notices: Addresses for Notices:
Mercoza City of Pacifica
75 E. Santa Clara Street, Suite 900 540 Crespi Drive
San Jose, CA 95113 Pacifica, CA 94044
5.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 4 Appendix A to Construction Services Agreement
SCOPE OF WORK
The project includes new concrete sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, curb and gutter, installing hot mix asphalt and other miscellaneous work described in the Plans and Specifications entitled: FY 23-24 Concrete Improvements Project.
5.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 5 Appendix B to Construction Services Agreement
GENERAL CONDITIONS
ARTICLE 1 TERMS OF PERFORMANCE
Construction Services Agreement (Agreement) Force and Effect. The provisions of the Agreement and other Contract Documents constitute the entire agreement between the Contractor and Owner regarding the Work described herein. No representation, term or covenant not expressly specified in the Contract Documents shall be a part of the parties’ agreement. The Agreement and other Contract Documents shall govern the Work (whenever performed), and shall supersede all other purchase orders and agreements between Contractor and Owner, and any proposal, with respect to the Work.
Construction Performance Bond; Construction Labor and Materials Payment Bond; Securities in Lieu of Retention Escrow Account.
If Contract Sum under the Agreement exceeds (or is expected to exceed) $25,000, Contractor shall provide (i) a construction labor and material payment bond, in accordance with Civil Code Section 9550 and in form attached hereto Appendix D – Construction Labor and Materials Payment Bond, and (ii) a construction performance bond in form attached hereto as Appendix E – Construction Performance Bond. Contractor may not substitute cash in lieu of the required bond(s).
If the Agreement specifies performance retention, Contractor may elect to substitute securities or direct payment to an escrow account, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300 (incorporated herein by this reference).
Records and Payment Requests. Contractor shall submit all billings with all necessary invoices or other appropriate evidence of proper performance, after which Owner shall make payment within 30 days. Upon Owner’s written request, Contractor shall make available to Owner, its authorized agents, officers, or employees, any and all ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, cancelled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to the Work or the expenditures and disbursement charged to Owner, and all correspondence, internal memoranda, calculations, books and accounts, records documenting its Work under the Contract Documents, and invoices, payrolls, timecards, records and all other data related to matters covered by the Contract Documents.
Contractor shall furnish to Owner, its authorized agents, officers, or employees, such other evidence or information as Owner may require with regard to the Work or any such expenditure or disbursement charged by Contractor. Contractor shall maintain all such documents and records prepared by or furnished to Contractor during the course of performing the Work for at least five years following completion of the Work, except that all such items pertaining to hazardous materials shall be maintained for at least 30 years. Contractor shall permit Owner to audit, examine and make copies, excerpts and transcripts from such records. The State of California or any federal agency having an interest in the subject of the Contract Documents shall have the same rights conferred to Owner by this section. Such rights shall be specifically enforceable.
Use of Contract Documents and Other Information. Drawings, Specifications, and other Contract Documents are made available to Contractor solely for Contractor’s use under the Contract Documents. Further, all tangible and intangible property developed, produced and/or provided by Contractor under the Contract Documents, and all such items (other than Contract Documents) provided by Owner to Contractor in connection with the Contract Documents including, without limitation, drawings, specifications, sketches, models, samples, tools, computer programs, technical information, confidential business information, scripts, customer or personnel information and data, whether written, oral or otherwise (all hereinafter referred to as Information) shall be Owner’s sole property. Contractor may not use Contract Documents or Information for
5.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 6 any purpose unrelated to Contract Documents without Owner’s prior written consent. All copies of Information in written, graphic or other tangible form shall be delivered to Owner upon completion of Work, or earlier if otherwise provided in Contract Documents.
Performance of Work/No Assignment. Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work.
Contractor will perform the Work in a skillful and workmanlike manner; comply fully with criteria established by Owner, and with applicable laws, codes, and all applicable industry standards.
Contractor shall maintain its work area in a clean and sanitary condition, clear debris and trash at the end of each work day, and shall not damage or disrupt any property unless specifically part of the scope of the Contract Documents. Contractor shall not contract any portion of the Work or otherwise assign the Contract Documents without prior written approval of Owner. (Contractor shall remain responsible for compliance with all terms of the Contract Documents, regardless of the terms of any such assignment.) Contractor shall permit Owner (or its designees) access to the work area, Contractor’s shop, or any other facility, to permit inspection of the Work at all times during construction and/or manufacture and fabrication. The granting of any progress payment, and any inspections, reviews, approvals or oral statements by any Owner representative, or certification by any governmental entity, shall in no way limit or relieve Contractor from its obligations under the Contract Documents. Either party’s waiver of any breach, or the omission or failure of either party, at any time, to enforce any right reserved to it, or to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract Documents, shall not be a waiver of any other right to which any party is entitled, and shall not in any way affect, limit, modify or waive that party’s right thereafter to enforce or compel strict compliance with every provision hereof. Owner shall have, at all times, set-off rights with respect to any payment and Contractor’s failure to perform the terms of the Contract Documents.
Defective Work; Warranties. Contractor warrants that all construction services shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional standards of good and sound construction practices, all Contract Documents requirements, and all laws, codes, standards, licenses, and permits. Contractor warrants that all materials and equipment shall be new, of suitable grade of their respective kinds for their intended uses, and free from defects. Contractor hereby grants to Owner for a period of one year following the date of completion its unconditional warranty of the quality and adequacy of all of the Work including, without limitation, all labor, materials and equipment provided by Contractor and its Subcontractors of all tiers. If either prior to completion of the Work, or within one year after completion, any Work (completed or incomplete) is found to violate any of the foregoing warranties (Defective Work), Contractor shall promptly, without cost to Owner and in accordance with Owner’s written instructions, correct, remove and replace the Defective Work with conforming Work, and correct, remove and replace any damage to other Work or other property resulting therefrom. If Contractor fails to do so within five days of Owner’s written notice (or other time period specified in the notice), Contractor shall pay all of the Owner’s resulting claims, costs, losses and damages. Where Contractor fails to timely correct Defective Work, or defects are discovered outside the correction period, Owner shall have all rights and remedies granted by law.
Earthwork and Underground Facilities. If the Work involves digging trenches or other excavations that extend deeper than four feet below the surface, Contractor shall notify Owner in writing of any material that Contractor believes may be hazardous waste that is required to be removed in accordance law, subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids, or unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract Documents, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7104. For any Work involving trench shoring that costs in excess of $25,000, Contractor shall submit and Owner (or a
5.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 7 registered civil or structural engineer employed by Owner) must accept, in advance of excavation, a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during the excavation of such trench or trenches, pursuant to Labor Code Section 6705. If such plan varies from the shoring system standards, the plan shall be prepared by a registered civil or structural engineer. Consistent with Government Code Section 4215, as between Owner and Contractor, Owner will be responsible for the timely removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunk line utility facilities located on the Site only if such utilities are not identified in the Contract Documents or information made available for bidding.
LEGAL
Compliance with Laws; Conflict of Interests. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations and policies, as amended, including those regarding discrimination, unfair labor practices, anti-kick-back, collusion, prevailing wages, labor compliance, and the provisions of the Americans with Disability Act. Contractor, its officer, partners, associates, agents, and employees, shall not make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use the position afforded them by the Contract Documents to influence any governmental decision in which he or she knows or has reason to know that he or she has a financial interest under applicable state, federal and local conflict of interest regulations. Contractor warrants that no person or agency has been employed or retained, or will be employed or retained, to solicit or obtain any contract with Owner, upon an agreement or understanding for a contingent fee, except a bona fide employee or agency.
Licenses, Patents, Permits. Before commencing Work, Contractor shall apply for, obtain and maintain in current status, at its own expense, any license, permit or approval required from any agency for the performance of Work. To the greatest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall not be entitled to any compensation for any Work performed while not properly licensed, etc.
Employee Wages; Records; Apprentices. This Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor shall post job site notices as prescribed by regulation. Contractor shall pay prevailing wages to its employees on any Order in excess of $1,000.00. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at Owner’s principal office. Contractor shall comply with the 8-hours per day/40 hours per week/overtime/working hours restrictions for all employees, pursuant to the California Labor Code.
Contractor and all subcontractors shall keep and maintain accurate employee payroll records for Work performed. The payroll records shall be certified and submitted as required by law, including Labor Code Section 1771.4 and 1776, including (if the Agreement is awarded on or after April 1, 2015 or continues on or after January 1, 2016) to the Labor Commissioner no less frequently than monthly. Contractor shall comply fully with Labor Code Section 1777.5 in the hiring of apprentices for work relating to the Agreement. If Contract Sum exceeds $2,000 and is funded with federal funds, then Contractor shall pay federal Davis Bacon wages and comply with applicable federal requirements.
Mandatory Contractor and Subcontractor Registration. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771(a), Contractor represents that it and all of its Subcontractors are currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor covenants that any additional or substitute Subcontractors will be similarly registered and qualified.
Indemnity/Liability. Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Owner and each of its officers, directors, representatives, agents and employees, against all claims, suits, actions, loss, cost, damage, expense, and liability arising from or related to bodily injury to or death of any person or damage to any property, or resulting from any breach and/or Contractor’s negligence in performing the Work pursuant to the Contract Documents.
Notwithstanding any provision of the Contract Documents, Owner shall not be liable to Contractor
5.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 8 or anyone claiming under it, in contract or tort, for any special, consequential, indirect or incidental damages arising out of or in connection with the Contract Documents or the Work. Owner’s rights and remedies, whether under the Contract Documents or other applicable law, shall be cumulative and not subject to limitation.
Worker’s Compensation. Pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1860 and 1861, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contractor represents that it is aware of the provisions of Labor Code Section 3700 that require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and Contractor shall comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work.
MISCELLANEOUS
No Modification or Waiver; Severability. The Contract Documents may not be modified, nor may compliance with any of its terms be waived, except by written instrument executed and approved by fully authorized representatives of Owner and Contractor. Contract Documents headings are for convenience only and do not affect the construction of the Contract Documents. Should any part of the Contract Documents be declared invalid, void or unenforceable, all remaining parts, terms and provisions of the Contract Documents shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be invalidated, impaired or affected thereby.
Independent Contractor. Contractor is an independent Contractor and does not act as Owner’s agent in any capacity, whatsoever. Contractor is not entitled to any benefits that Owner provides to Owner employees including, without limitation, insurance, worker’s compensation benefits or payments, pension benefits, health benefits or insurance benefits. Terms within the Contract Documents regarding directives apply to and concern the result of the Contractor’s provision of Work not the means, methods, or scheduling of the Contractor’s Work. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures with respect to its provision of Work under the Contract Documents. Contractor shall pay all payroll taxes imposed by any governmental entity and will pay all other taxes not specifically identified in the Contract Documents as Owner’s responsibility.
Termination; Suspension; Disputes. Owner may direct Contractor to terminate, suspend, delay, interrupt or accelerate Work, in whole or in part, for such periods of time as Owner may determine in its sole discretion. Owner will issue such directives in writing, and may do so, in whole or in part, for its convenience or due to Contractor’s fault. Owner will compensate Contractor for extra costs resulting from such directives only to the extent that Owner issues such directives for its convenience and not due to Contractor’s fault (but Owner shall not compensate Contractor for costs, profit or overhead anticipated to be earned or incurred on Work terminated for Owner’s convenience.) Contractor shall continue its Work throughout the course of any dispute, and Contractor’s failure to continue Work during a dispute shall be a material breach of the Contract Documents. All claims by Contractor against Owner shall be submitted in writing to Owner, and shall be governed by Public Contract Code Sections 20104 – 20104.6, after which time the one year time period in Government Code Section 911.2 shall be, pursuant to Government Code Section 930.2, reduced to 90 days. Should Contractor be terminated for default, and such termination is subsequently determined to be wrongful, such termination will be converted to a termination for convenience as provided herein.
Notices. All notices between the parties hereto shall be in writing and may be served by commercial express/overnight courier service or by depositing the same in the United States mail, postage prepaid and certified receipt requested, and addressed as indicated beneath each party’s signature in the Master Agreement, or as either party may otherwise provide to the other.
5.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 9 Dispute Resolution. All Contractor claims not otherwise subject to Public Contract Code Sections 20104 et seq shall, as a condition precedent to litigation thereon, first be mediated. Mediation shall be confidential, non-binding, pursuant to the construction mediation procedures of JAMS in San Francisco, California, and utilize the services of a mediator mutually acceptable to the parties. If the parties are unable to agree, the mediator will be selected by JAMS from its panel of approved construction industry mediators, having a minimum of 10 years’ experience in the construction industry. The cost of mediation shall be equally shared by all parties to the mediation. The parties shall, prior to the commencement of a mediation pursuant to this Paragraph, upon notice of the other party, exchange relevant, non-privileged project documents in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure Sections 2031.010 et seq. Additionally, the parties may agree mutually to engage in additional discovery prior to mediation. Should the parties proceed with additional discovery, they shall, unless mutually agreed otherwise, comply with Code of Civil Procedure Sections 2019, et. seq. The Mediator will undertake to resolve any discovery disputes relating to the Mediation.
Execution; Venue; Limitations. The Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed in San Mateo County, California. Enforcement of the Contract Documents shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflict of laws rules. Except as expressly provided in the Contract Documents, nothing in the Contract Documents shall operate to confer rights or benefits on persons or entities other than Owner and Contractor. As between the parties to the Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations for any act or failure to act shall commence to run on the date of Owner’s issuance of the final Certificate for Payment, or termination of the Contract Documents, whichever is earlier, except for latent defects, for which the statute of limitation shall begin running upon discovery of the defect and its cause.
5.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 10 Appendix C to Construction Services Agreement
INSURANCE
1. Commercial General Liability Insurance, written on an “occurrence” basis, which shall provide coverage for bodily injury, death and property damage resulting from operations, liability for slander, false arrest and invasion of privacy, blanket contractual liability, broad form endorsement, and completed operations, personal and advertising liability, with limits of not less than [$1,000,000] general aggregate and [$1,000,000] each occurrence, subject to a deductible of not more than [$1,000] payable by Contractor.
2. Business Automobile Liability Insurance with limits not less than [$1,000,000] each occurrence including coverage for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, subject to a deductible of not more than [$1,000] payable by Contractor.
3. Workers’ Compensation Employers’ Liability limits not less than [$1,000,000] each accident, [$1,000,000] per disease and [$1,000,000] aggregate. Contractor’s Workers’ Compensation Insurance policy shall contain a Waiver of Subrogation against the City of Pacifica, its officers, directors, officials, agents, employees and volunteers. In the event Contractor is self-insured, it shall furnish Certificate of Permission to Self-Insure signed by Department of Industrial Relations Administration of SelfInsurance, State of California.
4. [If applicable] Builder’s Risk Insurance including, without limitation, coverage against loss or damage to the Work by fire, lightening, wind, hail, aircraft, riot, vehicle damage, explosion, smoke, falling objects, vandalism, malicious mischief, collapse, and other such hazards as are normally covered by such coverage. Such insurance shall be in amount equal to the replacement cost (without deduction for depreciation and subject to stipulated value in lieu of average clause) of all construction constituting any part of the Work, excluding the cost of excavations, of grading and filling of the land. [Alternatively, if applicable] An Installation Floater including, without limitation, coverage against loss or damage to the Work by fire, lightening, wind, hail, vandalism, malicious mischief, and other such hazards as are normally covered by such coverage. Such insurance shall be in amount equal to the replacement cost (without deduction for depreciation and subject to stipulated value in lieu of average clause) of the Work. [If either Builder’s Risk or an Installation Floater is required, continue] Such insurance may be subject to deductible clauses not to exceed [$10,000] for any one loss. Such insurance will not cover loss or damage to Contractor’s equipment, scaffolding or other materials not to be consumed in the performance of the Work. The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against Owner.
5. Insurance policies in Appendix C shall contain an endorsement containing the following terms:
5.01 City of Pacifica, its officers, directors, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers, shall be named as additional insureds, but only with respect to liability arising out of the activities of the named insured, and there shall be a waiver of subrogation as to each named and additional insured.
5.02 The policies shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the company’s liability.
5.03 Written notice of cancellation, non-renewal or of any material change in the policies shall be mailed to Owner thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date thereof.
5.04 Insurance shall be primary insurance and no other insurance or self-insured retention carried or held by any named or additional insureds other than Contractor shall be called upon to contribute to a loss covered by insurance for the named insured.
5.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 11
6. Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements shall have clearly typed thereon the Project Name, shall clearly describe the coverage and shall contain a provision requiring the mailing of written notices of cancellation described in clause 5.03 above.
7. All policies of insurance shall be placed with insurers acceptable to Owner. The insurance underwriter(s) must be duly licensed to do business in the State of California and (other than for workers’ compensation) must have an A. M. Best Company rating of [A-,VII] or better. Required minimum amounts of insurance may be increased should conditions of Work, in the opinion of Owner, warrant such increase. Contractor shall increase required insurance amounts upon direction by Owner.
5.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 12 Appendix D to Construction Services Agreement
CONSTRUCTION LABOR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
1. THAT WHEREAS, the City of Pacifica, a general law city and municipal corporation of the State of California (Owner) has awarded to Mercoza as Principal a Construction Services Agreement, dated the 27
th day of March, 2023 (Agreement), titled FY 23-24 Concrete Improvements Project located at the City of Pacifica in the amount of $203,279.50 (Contract Sum), which Agreement is by this reference made a part hereof, for the work described as follows:
The project includes new concrete sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, curb and gutter, installing hot mix asphalt and other miscellaneous work described in the Plans and Specifications entitled: FY 23-24 Concrete Improvements Project.
2. AND WHEREAS, Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with the Agreement to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, material suppliers, and other persons as provided by law;
3. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal and ______________________________ as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto Owner in the sum of 100% OF THE CONTRACT SUM ($_________________), for which payment well and truly to be made we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
4. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if Principal, or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns approved by Owner, or its subcontractors shall fail to pay any of the persons named in California Civil Code Section 9100, or amounts due under the State of California Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed under the Agreement, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the State of California Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of Principal and subcontractors pursuant to California Unemployment Insurance Code Section 13020 with respect to such work and labor, that Surety will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees, otherwise the above obligation shall become and be null and void.
5. This bond shall inure to the benefit of any of the persons named in California Civil Code Section 9100, as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. The intent of this bond is to comply with the California Mechanic’s Lien Law.
6. Surety, for value received, hereby expressly agrees that no extension of time, change, modification, alteration, or addition to the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions, and agreements of the Agreement, or to the work to be performed thereunder, shall in any way affect the obligation of this bond; and it does hereby waive notice of any such extension of time, change, modification, alteration, or addition to the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions, and agreements of the Agreement, or to the work to be performed thereunder.
7. Surety’s obligations hereunder are independent of the obligations of any other surety for the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, material suppliers, and other persons in connection with Agreement; and suit may be brought against Surety and such other sureties, jointly and severally, or against any one or more of them, or against less than all of them without impairing Owner’s rights against the other.
5.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 13
8. Correspondence or claims relating to this bond shall be sent to Surety at the address set forth below.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this __________ day of ____________________, 20___.
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY
Company: (Corp. Seal) Company: (Corp. Seal)
Signature Signature
Name Name
Title Title
Street Address Street Address
City, State, Zip Code City, State, Zip Code
END OF DOCUMENT
5.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 14 Appendix E to Construction Services Agreement
CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
1. THAT WHEREAS, City of Pacifica, a general law city and municipal corporation of the State of California (Owner) has awarded to Mercoza as Principal a Construction Services Agreement, dated the 27
th day of March, 2023 (Agreement), titled FY 23-24 Concrete Improvements Project located at the City of Pacifica in the amount of $203,279.50 (Contract Sum), which Agreement is by this reference made a part hereof, for the work described as follows:
The project includes new concrete sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, curb and gutter, installing hot mix asphalt and other miscellaneous work described in the Plans and Specifications entitled: FY 23-24 Concrete Improvements Project.
2. AND WHEREAS, Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with the Agreement, guaranteeing the faithful performance thereof;
3. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal and _________________________ as Surety are held and firmly bound unto Owner in the sum of 100% OF THE CONTRACT SUM to be paid to Owner or its successors and assigns; for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
4. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if Principal, or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns approved by Owner, shall promptly and faithfully perform the covenants, conditions, and agreements of the Agreement during the original term and any extensions thereof as may be granted by Owner, with or without notice to Surety, and during the period of any guarantees or warranties required under the Agreement, and shall also promptly and faithfully perform all the covenants, conditions, and agreements of any alteration of the Agreement made as therein provided, notice of which alterations to Surety being hereby waived, on Principal’s part to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless Owner as stipulated in the Agreement, then this obligation shall become and be null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
5. No extension of time, change, alteration, modification, or addition to the Agreement, or of the work required thereunder, shall release or exonerate Surety on this bond or in any way affect the obligation of this bond; and Surety does hereby waive notice of any such extension of time, change, alteration, modification, or addition.
6. Whenever Principal shall be and declared by Owner in default under the Agreement, Surety shall promptly remedy the default, or shall promptly:
6.01 Undertake through its agents or independent contractors, reasonably acceptable to Owner, to complete the Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions and to pay and perform all obligations of Principal under the Agreement including, without limitation, all obligations with respect to warranties, guarantees, indemnities, and the payment of liquidated damages; or
6.02 Obtain a bid or bids for completing the Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions, and, upon determination by Owner of the lowest responsible bidder, reasonably acceptable to Owner, arrange for a contract between such bidder and Owner and make available as work progresses (even though there should be a default or a succession of defaults under the contract or contracts of completion arranged under this paragraph) sufficient funds to pay the cost of
5.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 15 completion less the balance of the Contract Sum, and to pay and perform all obligations of Principal under the Agreement including, without limitation, all obligations with respect to warranties, guarantees, and the payment of liquidated damages; but, in any event, Surety’s total obligations hereunder shall not exceed the amount set forth in the third paragraph hereof. The term “balance of the Contract Sum,” as used in this paragraph, shall mean the total amount payable by Owner to the Principal under the Agreement and any amendments thereto, less the amount Owner paid to Principal.
7. Surety’s obligations hereunder are independent of the obligations of any other surety for the performance of the Agreement, and suit may be brought against Surety and such other sureties, jointly and severally, or against any one or more of them, or against less than all of them without impairing Owner’s rights against the others. Surety may not use Contractor to complete the Agreement absent Owner’s written consent.
8. No right of action shall accrue on this bond to or for the use of any person or corporation other than Owner or its successors or assigns.
9. Surety may join in any proceedings brought under the Agreement and shall be bound by any judgment.
10. Correspondence or claims relating to this bond shall be sent to Surety at the address set forth below.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this _________ day of ________________, 20___.
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY
Company: (Corp. Seal) Company: (Corp. Seal)
Signature Signature
Name Name
Title Title
Street Address Street Address
City, State, Zip Code City, State, Zip Code
END OF DOCUMENT
5.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 16 Appendix F to Construction Services Agreement
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS
1. Plans
See Plans and Specifications entitled: FY 23-24 Concrete Improvements Project.
2. Shop Drawings
Shop drawings will not be required on this project.
3. Dust Control and Cleanup
During the construction period, the dust level shall be kept at a minimum. The premises shall also be kept free from the accumulation of waste material or rubbish. Failure to meet this requirement may result in project shutdown.
The final cleaning shall leave the facilities ready for use with no additional cleanup. Use no cleaning materials which will contaminate the ocean. At the completion of the contract, the Contractor shall remove all remaining litter, debris, materials, temporary structures and equipment from the site.
The premises shall be left in a clean and orderly condition acceptable to the City Engineer.
In the event Contractor leaves the job overnight in an unclean condition, City may take action to provide necessary requirements and will deduct the cost of doing so from subsequent Contractor payments.
4. Public Safety
Contractor shall be responsible during all phases of work to provide for public safety and convenience. It shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to provide adequate provisions to assure the safety of the general public throughout the duration of the project, including periods when no work is being performed. The site shall be thoroughly fenced-off when work is not actively in progress, and lighted barricades shall be placed around any obstructions not encompassed by this fence.
In the event Contractor leaves the job overnight in an unsafe condition, or fails to provide for public safety and convenience, City may take action to provide necessary requirements and will deduct the cost of doing so from subsequent Contractor payments.
All applicable safety regulations shall be complied with to protect the public and the Contractor’s employees. Strict compliance with Cal/OSHA safety requirements in doing the work is required.
5. Prevailing Wage Rates
The Contractor shall post, in a location on the job site, the prevailing wage rate Determination which is applicable to this project.
6. Discrimination
5.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 17 No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of the race, sex, age, color, national origin, creed, sexual orientation or marital status of such persons and every contractor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Section 1735 of the California Labor Code.
7. Employment of Apprentices
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 (Chapter 1411, Statutes of 1967) and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
The Contractor and any subcontractor shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
8. Materials and Supplies
All materials and supplies called for by contractor’s scope and proposal and shall be new unless otherwise specified.
9. Protection
The Contractor shall provide adequate protection for the site and surroundings throughout the work.
All damage done to existing property shall be neatly repaired or replaced at the Contractor’s expense. Work shall be executed in a careful and orderly manner with the least possible disturbance to public and occupants of the area.
The Contractor shall conduct his operations in such a manner as to avoid damage to existing improvements and adjacent property. The Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair or replace any damage occurring from his operations to pursue completion of the contract. The repairs and replacement shall be to the satisfaction of the Engineer and according to City standards and practices. The minimum repair or replacement shall be equal to surrounding existing conditions or better, and the Engineer’s decision as to acceptable repair or replacement shall be final. The burden of proof as to whether there was existing damage by the Contractor shall rest with the Contractor.
The site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. All existing facilities shall be protected and, if they are damaged or destroyed by the Contractor, shall be restored or replaced in kind at his expense, to their original conditions, or better, as approved by the City or other owner thereof. The site shall be secured at the conclusion of each work day.
10. Inspections
Inspectors, employed by the City, shall be authorized to inspect all work done and all materials furnished. Such inspection may extend to all or any part of the work on the project and to the preparation, fabrication or manufacture of the materials to be used. An inspector is not authorized to revoke, alter or waive any requirements of the specifications. He is authorized to call the attention of the Contractor to any failure of the work or materials to conform to the specifications and
5.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 18 contract. He shall have the authority to reject materials or suspend the work until any question at issue can be referred to and decided by the Engineer.
An inspector will in no case act as foreman or perform other duties for the Contractor, nor interfere with the Contractor’s management of the work.
In case the Contractor refuses to suspend operations on verbal order, the inspector giving such verbal order will then issue the order in writing. After placing the order in the hands of the person in charge of the work for the Contractor, the inspector will immediately leave the job. Work done during the absence of the inspector will not be accepted or compensated.
The Contractor shall prosecute work only in the presence of an authorized inspector or authorized representative of the Engineer, and any work done without such inspection shall be at the Contractor’s risk and be subject to rejection.
The Contractor shall furnish the Engineer with every reasonable facility for ascertaining whether or not the work, as performed, is in accordance with the requirements and intent of the specifications and contract. The Contractor shall at all times and for any purpose permit the Engineer and any of his representatives and representatives of the City to have access to the work and the premises used by the Contractor.
11. Defective Materials
Any materials condemned or rejected by the Engineer as not meeting the requirements of these specifications may be branded or otherwise marked by the Engineer and shall, on demand, be at once removed by the Contractor to a satisfactory distance from the work.
If the Contractor does not remove such material within a reasonable time, fixed by written notice, the City may remove and store the materials at the expense of the Contractor. If the Contractor does not pay the expense of such removal and storage within ten days thereafter, the City may, upon ten days’ written notice, sell such materials at auction or at private sale. The City will account for the net proceeds thereof after deducting all the costs and expenses that should have been borne by the Contractor.
No partial payment, inspection, taking possession of, or other act made or done by the Engineer or the City with respect to the work prior to the final completion and acceptance thereof shall relieve Contractor from performing the Work in accordance with this contract, and shall not affect or prejudice the right of the Engineer or the City to reject any defective work or material or to require the Contractor complete fulfillment of all the provisions of the contract.
If the Engineer deems it expedient and not in the best interests of the City to correct work injured or done not in accordance with the contract, the defective work may be accepted subject to an equitable deduction from the contract price which may be made therefor by the City upon certificate from the Engineer.
12. Temporary Suspension of Work and Extension of Time for Performance When conditions at the site of the proposed work are unsatisfactory for the prosecution of a part or all of the work as adjudged by the Contractor and he is forced to suspend such work until reasonable conditions for its prosecution exist, he may request, in writing, that the Engineer authorize such suspension of work. Without the Engineer’s approval, any suspensions violate this specification.
5.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 19 Unsatisfactory conditions may include, but not limited to: inclement weather, excessively high surf and/or tides, strikes, excessive high or low ambient temperature and inability of delivery of materials by suppliers for good reason.
When, in the opinion of the Engineer, suspensions of work are beyond the control of both the Contractor and the City (including, without limitation, adverse weather, conditions, earthquakes, force majeure events), the time of performance as set forth in the Agreement will be extended by the Engineer, in writing, by a period of time equal to that lost due to the delay occasioned by the allowed suspension, all at no additional cost to the City and without waiver of remedies for nonproliferation of the work. Such allowed suspension of work shall not relieve the Contractor of his contractual responsibilities.
13. Laws and Regulations
The Contractor shall comply with all local, regional, State and Federal laws and regulations at all times. In addition, the Contractor shall meet the standards set by the Air Quality Act for Noise and Pollution. If there is any conflict between these specifications and provisions and any laws or regulations, the matter shall be brought to the attention of the Engineer immediately.
14. Sound Control Requirements
The Contractor shall comply with all local sound control and noise level rules, regulations and ordinances which apply to any work performed pursuant to the contract.
Each internal combustion engine, used for any purposes on the job or related to the job, shall be equipped with a muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer. No internal combustion engine shall be operated on the project without said muffler.
15. Air Pollution Control
The Contractor shall comply with all air pollution control rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes which apply to any work performed pursuant to the contract, involving any air pollution control rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes specified in Section 11017 of the Government Code.
16. Water Pollution
General:
Contractor shall take all measures necessary to prevent debris or contamination from entering the ocean. Best Management Practice (BMP) shall be enforced at all times.
Correction of Inadequate Pollution and Erosion Control Measures:
If the measures being taken by the Contractor are inadequate to control water pollution effectively, the City Engineer may direct the Contractor to revise operations. The directions will be in writing and will specify the items of work for which the Contractor’s water pollution control measures are inadequate. No further work shall be performed on those items until the water pollution control measures are made adequate.
Abatement of Other Water Pollution:
5.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 20 The cleanup of water pollution by chemicals, petroleum products, cement or by the escape of any other material that is harmful or potentially harmful, from the work site as a result of the Contractor’s operations, into drainage systems or the ocean shall be the financial responsibility of the Contractor. The means of cleanup and the party or parties to be engaged to perform the cleanup work shall be determined by the Engineer in consultation with appropriate hazardous materials, pollution control, safety, health and wildlife authorities and officials. The Contractor shall immediately carry out cleanup orders issued to him through or by the Engineer and shall make the work site accessible to personnel and equipment from outside pollution control resources called in by the Engineer. The cost of cleanup action called for by the Engineer and performed by outside resources shall be deducted from any monies due or become due the Contractor.
Compensation:
Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the Contract Sum paid for the various items of work and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor.
17. Environmental Protection Requirements
Source Reduction and Recycling
The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) mandates that 25 percent of the waste stream in the City of Pacifica be diverted from landfill by 1995 and that this diversion increase to 50 percent by 2000. AB 939 also required the City of Pacifica to prepare and adopt a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) outlining recommended programs to meet the above noted diversion goals. One of the approved SRRE programs is to require the utilization of recycled construction materials for City projects. All work performed under this contract and all contractors and their associates and/or employees shall utilize recycled materials and recycle construction materials where feasible. Construction/Demolition Recycling Resources Lists are available from the Pacifica Planning Department and the California Integrated Waste Management Board.
Contractor shall reuse or recycle any useful construction materials generated during the project.
Disposal
At the end of each working day, the Contractor shall collect all scrap, debris and waste material and dispose of such materials properly.
Hazardous Material/Waste Management
A. Storage
The Contractor shall label and store all hazardous materials, such as pesticides, paints, thinners, solvents, and fuels; and all hazardous wastes, such as waste oil and antifreeze; in accordance with the City of Pacifica Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance and all applicable State and Federal regulations.
The Contractor shall store all hazardous materials and all hazardous wastes in accordance with secondary containment regulations, and it is recommended that these materials and
5.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 21 wastes be covered, as needed, to avoid potential management of collected rain water as a hazardous waste.
The Contractor shall keep an accurate, up-to-date inventory, including Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs), of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes stored on-site, to assist emergency response personnel in the event of a hazardous materials incident.
B. Disposal
The Contractor shall use secondary containment, such as a drip pan, to catch leaks or spills any time that vehicle or equipment fluids are dispensed, changed or poured.
The Contractor shall keep a stockpile of spill cleanup materials, such as rags or absorbents, readily accessible on site.
The Contractor shall clean up leaks and spills of vehicle or equipment fluids immediately and dispose of the waste and cleanup materials as hazardous waste, as described in the section above.
The Contractor shall not wash any spilled material into streets, gutters, storm drains or creeks and shall not bury spilled hazardous materials.
The Contractor shall report any hazardous materials spill to the City of Pacifica Building Division at (650) 738-7344.
The Contractor shall inspect vehicles and equipment arriving on site for leaking fluids and shall promptly repair leaking vehicles and equipment. Drip pans shall be used to catch leaks until repairs are made.
C. Activity-Specific Requirements
The following requirements shall be met on all projects within the City of Pacifica that include the listed activities.
Concrete, Grout and Mortar Waste Management
Material Management:
The Contractor shall store concrete, grout, and mortar away from drainage areas and ensure that these materials do not enter the storm drain system or the ocean waters.
Concrete Truck/Equipment Wash Out:
The Contractor shall not wash out concrete trucks or equipment into streets or gutters.
The Contractor shall perform washout of concrete trucks or equipment off-site or in a designated area on-site where the water will flow onto dirt or into a temporary pit in a dirt area. The Contractor shall let the water percolate into the soil and
5.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) FY 23-24 CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MERCOZA AGREEMENT – Page 22 dispose of the hardened concrete in a trash container. If a suitable dirt area is not available, then the Contractor shall collect the wash water and remove it off-site.
18. Layout of Work
Layout of work shall be done by the Contractor. Contractor shall mark the work area limits and facilities to be removed and replaced. All layout shall be approved by the City.
19. Substitutions
Substitutions in material or methods of construction, when necessary because of material shortages or in order to avoid serious delay may be made only after they are approved by the City Engineer in writing.
20. Traffic Control and Public Access
The Contractor shall be responsible for proper traffic control to assure public safety and convenience. Continuous safe public access shall be maintained to residential structures at all times.
21. Material and Workmanship
All materials and workmanship are to be the best of their respective kinds. The terms “or equal,” “approved,” “selected” and so forth shall mean as approved, etc. by the City Engineer. All materials and equipment used should be in accordance with the manufacturer’s printed directions.
Use adequate numbers of skilled workmen who are thoroughly trained and experienced in necessary crafts and who are completely familiar with the specified requirements and methods needed for proper performance of work specified. Use equipment adequate in terms of size, capacity and numbers to accomplish work in a timely manner.
22. Drug-Free Workplace
The Contractor is required to comply with the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988. The requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Policy are described in City of Pacifica Administrative Policy Number
46. 23. Harassment and Discrimination
The Contractor is required to comply with City of Pacifica Administrative Policy Number 33, Harassment and Discrimination in the Workplace.
24. Payroll Records
Contractor and each Sub-Contractor shall keep an accurate payroll record, showing the name, address, social security number, work week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by him in connection with the public work. All payroll records shall be certified and maintained by the Contractor and be made available to auditors and managers from the City upon request.
5.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Mercoza [Revision 1] (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvement Project) OAK #4850-6023-1119 v1 - 1 -
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
This Master Agreement for Consultant Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 27th day of March, 2023, by and between THE CITY OF PACIFICA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and WILSEY HAM (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT").
CITY and CONSULTANT may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY requires On-Call Construction Management and Inspection Services/Horizontal Construction in connection with Various City Projects; and WHEREAS, construction management/inspection services will be provided by Wilsey Ham; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to perform such services; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has agreed to provide CITY with such services on the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, for the considerations hereinafter set forth, CONSULTANT and CITY agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
1.1. Scope of Services. CONSULTANT agrees to furnish services pursuant to a Task Order in the form set forth in Exhibit A, Task Order, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Services").
1.2. Compliance with Law. The Services shall be performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders.
1.3. Time is of the Essence. CONSULTANT agrees to diligently prosecute the Services. In the performance of this Agreement, time is of the essence.
1.4. Professional Competence. CONSULTANT represents that it has the professional skills necessary to perform the Services and that it will perform the Services in a skillful and professional manner. CONSULTANT represents that it has all the necessary licenses to perform the Services and shall maintain them throughout the term of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees that the Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which CONSULTANT is engaged, in the same or similar geographical area in which CONSULTANT practices its profession, and will prepare all work products required by this Agreement in accordance with such standards. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT is in responsible charge of the Services. Acceptance by CITY of the Services does not operate as a release of CONSULTANT from professional responsibility for the Services performed.
1.5. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT expressly warrants that it will not represent that it is an employee of CITY. Persons employed or utilized by CONSULTANT in the performance of the Services will
5.b
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete - 2 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
not be employees or agents of CITY. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.
1.6. Confidentiality. CONSULTANT agrees to maintain in confidence and not disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation, without CITY's prior written consent, any trade secret or confidential information, knowledge or data relating to the products, process, or operation of CITY. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain in confidence and not to disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation any data, information, technology, or material developed or obtained by CONSULTANT during the performance of the Services. The covenants contained in this Section 1.6 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause.
1.7. Ownership of Material. Any reports and other material prepared by or on behalf of CONSULTANT under this Agreement (collectively, the "Documents") shall be and remain the property of CITY. All Documents not already provided to CITY shall be delivered to CITY on the date of termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Documents may be used by CITY and its agents, employees, representatives, and assigns, in whole or in part, or in modified form, for all purposes CITY may deem appropriate without further employment of or payment of any compensation to CONSULTANT.
1.8. Documentation. CONSULTANT shall keep and maintain full and complete documentation and accounting records, employee time sheets, and correspondence pertaining to the performance of the Services, and CONSULTANT shall make such documents available for review and/or audit by CITY and CITY's representatives at all reasonable times for at least four years after the termination of this Agreement or completion of the Services.
1.9. Testimony. CONSULTANT agrees to testify at CITY's request if litigation is brought against CITY in connection with the Services. Unless the action is brought by CONSULTANT or is based upon CONSULTANT's negligence, CITY will compensate CONSULTANT for the preparation and the testimony at CONSULTANT's standard hourly rates.
ARTICLE 2 - COMPENSATION
2.1. Compensation. Compensation for the Services shall be in accordance with the rate and schedules specified in a Task Order. However, in no event shall the amount the CITY pays to CONSULTANT for work done under a Task Order exceed the total compensation specified in the Task Order (“Cost Ceiling”).
2.2. Invoices. CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices in a form satisfactory to CITY on or before the tenth day of each month for Services provided during the preceding month.
CONSULTANT shall submit time and cost records as necessary to substantiate performance of the Services. Within 35 days after receipt of each such invoice, CITY shall verify the accuracy of the invoice, correct the charges where appropriate and as discussed and mutually agreed with CONSULTANT, and make payment to CONSULTANT in an amount equal to the amount of such invoice, as verified or corrected by CITY. No payment hereunder shall be construed as evidence of acceptance of any of CONSULTANT's work. CITY reserves the right to withhold payment from CONSULTANT on account of Services not performed satisfactorily, delays in CONSULTANT's performance of Services, or other defaults hereunder. CONSULTANT shall not stop or delay performance of the Services under this Agreement on account of payment disputes with CITY.
5.b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete - 3 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
2.3. Status Reports. Together with each monthly invoice, CONSULTANT shall submit a status report detailing the amount expended on the Services to that date and the remaining amount to be expended before the Cost Ceiling is reached. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY in writing when payments have reached 90 percent of the Cost Ceiling.
2.4. Withholding. In lieu of holding retention, CITY shall withhold CONSULTANT's final payment under a Task Order until the Services provided under that Task Order are complete and CITY has received all Documents. CONSULTANT shall diligently continue and complete performance of the Services if the Services are not complete at the time CONSULTANT has performed services up to the Cost Ceiling.
ARTICLE 3 - TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution of the second signature and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 2024 (the "Term"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be extended for successive one-year term(s) upon mutual, written approval by the City Manager or his/her designee and CONSULTANT. Work authorized by a Task Order shall be performed in accordance with the schedule set forth in the Task Order.
3.2. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by CITY upon written notice to CONSULTANT.
3.3. Final Payment. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to compensation for Services performed up to the time of such termination, it being understood that any payments are full compensation for the Services rendered under this Agreement.
3.4. Other Remedies. Nothing in this Article 3 shall be deemed to limit the respective rights of the parties to terminate this Agreement for cause or otherwise to exercise any rights or pursue any remedies which may accrue to them.
ARTICLE 4 - DESIGNATED CONTACTS
4.1. CITY Contact. CITY designates Roland Yip, PE, its Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer, as its contact who shall be responsible for administering and interpreting the terms and conditions of this Agreement, for matters relating to CONSULTANT's performance under this Agreement, and for liaison and coordination between CITY and CONSULTANT. In the event CITY wishes to make a change in CITY 's representative, CITY will notify CONSULTANT of the change in writing.
4.2. CONSULTANT Contact. CONSULTANT designates Brandon Davis, Principal Engineer/Executive Vice President as its contact, who shall have immediate responsibility for the performance of the Services and for all matters relating to performance under this Agreement.
Any change in CONSULTANT's designated contact shall be subject to written approval by CITY.
ARTICLE 5 - INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
5.1. Indemnification. CONSULTANT shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to claims, liability, loss, damage, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's and expert witness fees, awards, fines, penalties, or judgments, arising out of or relating to the Services
5.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete - 4 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
(collectively "Claims") that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its Officials, officers, employees and agents (the "CITY Parties"), except to the extent the Claims are attributable to CITY Parties' gross negligence or willful misconduct. CONSULTANT shall defend the CITY Parties as required by California Civil Code Section 2778, and with counsel reasonably acceptable to those parties. CONSULTANT shall have no right to seek reimbursement from the CITY Parties for the costs of defense.
If CONSULTANT is a “design professional,” as defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c), CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold the Indemnitees harmless against Liability only to the extent such Liability arises out of, pertains to, or relates to CONSULTANT’s negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct. In such an event, the cost to defend charged to CONSULTANT shall not exceed CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault.
The obligations contained in this Section 5.1 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause for the full period of time allowed by law and shall not in any way be limited by the insurance requirements of this Agreement.
5.2. Health and Safety. CONSULTANT may perform part of the Services at sites which contain unknown working conditions and contaminated materials. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the health and safety of CONSULTANT's employees during the performance of the Services.
5.3. Insurance. CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS employees, subcontractors, consultants and other agency shall procure, provide and maintain at all times during the performance of this Agreement, and for such additional periods as described herein, the insurance listed below with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a Best's rating of no less than A:VII.
A. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance providing bodily injury liability and property damage, to protect against all liability arising out of the use of any owned, leased, passenger or commercial automobile at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit and $2,000,000 aggregate.
Coverage shall apply to hired and non-owned autos.
B. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial General Liability Insurance, with limits providing a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage for each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and $2,000,000 products/completed operations aggregate. The insurance shall cover all operations including but not limited to the following: (1) premises, operations and mobile equipment liability; (2) completed operations and products liability; (3) contractual liability insuring the obligations assumed by CONSULTANT in this Agreement; (4) broad form property damage liability; (5) personal injury liability endorsement, including death; and (6) automobile bodily injury and property damage insurance, including all owned, hired and non-owned equipment.
C. Professional Liability Insurance. Professional Liability Insurance protecting against liabilities arising out of or in connection with negligent acts, errors, or omissions of CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS employees, subcontractors, consultants and other agency in connection with this Agreement, at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage and $1,000,000 aggregate, on a "claims made basis" with
5.b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete - 5 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
a continuation of coverage extension for liabilities for two years from the date the Services are substantially complete. Such professional liability policies shall include coverage for liability assumed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement.
D. Workers Compensation Insurance. Workers Compensation insurance, occupational disease insurance and employer’s liability insurance shall be required with minimum limits as required by law, covering all workplaces involved in this Agreement.
E. Policy Terms. Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with Certificates of Insurance evidencing that CONSULTANT has obtained or maintains the insurance required by this Section 5.3. The Certificates shall be on forms acceptable to CITY. CONSULTANT shall also furnish CITY with original endorsements with the following documentation:
• Precluding cancellation or reduction in coverage before the expiration of thirty (30) days after CITY shall have received written notification thereof from CONSULTANT by United States mail;
• Providing that CONSULTANT's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, and include a “separation of insureds” or “severability” clause which treats each insured separately, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability (crossliability endorsement); • Excepting CONSULTANT’S professional liability insurance, naming CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds (“Additional Insureds”); and
• Providing that for any claims relating to CONSULTANT's services hereunder, CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents, and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY for itself, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents shall be in excess of CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not be contributory with it. • It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverages requirements and/or limits shall be available to the Additional Insured, including but not limited to any umbrella or excess insurance. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be the greater of: (a) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (b) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured.
F. Material Breach. If CONSULTANT fails to maintain insurance coverage or provided insurance documentation which is required pursuant to this Agreement, it shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement. CITY, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from CONSULTANT resulting from said breach.
Alternatively, CITY may purchase the required insurance coverage, and without further notice to CONSULTANT, may deduct from sums due to CONSULTANT any premium costs advanced by CITY for such insurance. These remedies shall be in addition to any other remedies available to CITY.
ARTICLE 6 - NOTICES
5.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete - 6 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered or sent by facsimile or reputable overnight courier and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of: (1) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice; (2) if delivered by Federal Express or other overnight courier for next business day delivery, the next business day; (3) if sent by facsimile, with the original sent on the same day by overnight courier, the date on which the facsimile is received, provided it is before 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time; or (4) if sent electronically, the date of delivery on the confirmed read receipt. Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this Article 6. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of a change in address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice or communication sent. Unless changed in accordance herewith, the addresses for notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be as follows:
If to CITY: City Manager
540 Crespi Drive
Pacifica, CA 94404
Phone: (650) 738-7409
Facsimile: (650) 359-6038
Email: [email protected]
If to CONSULTANT: Brandon Davis
Principal Engineer/Executive Vice President
3130 La Selva Street, Suite 100
San Mateo, CA 94403
Phone: (650) 349-2151
Email: [email protected]
ARTICLE 7 - MISCELLANEOUS
7.1. Conflict of Interest Prohibition. CITY and CONSULTANT will comply with the requirements of the CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code adopted pursuant to California Government Code §87300 et seq., the Political Reform Act (California Government Code §81000 et seq.), the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission (Title 2, §18110 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations), California Government Code §1090 et seq., and any other ethics laws applicable to the performance of the Services and/or this Agreement. CONSULTANT may be required to file with the CITY Clerk a completed Form 700 before commencing performance of the Services unless the CITY Clerk determines that completion of a Form 700 is not required, pursuant to CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code. Form 700 forms are available from the CITY Clerk.
CONSULTANT may not perform Services for any other person or entity that, pursuant to any applicable law or regulation, would result in a conflict of interest or would otherwise be prohibited with respect to CONSULTANT’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees to cooperate fully with CITY and to provide any necessary and appropriate information requested by CITY or any authorized representative concerning potential conflicts of interest or prohibitions concerning CONSULTANT’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
CONSULTANT may not employ any CITY official, officer or employee in the performance of the Services, nor may any official, officer or employee of CITY have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code §1090 et seq. CONSULTANT
5.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete - 7 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY. If CONSULTANT was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY in the previous twelve months, CONSULTANT warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code §1090 et seq., the entire Agreement is void and CONSULTANT will not be entitled to any compensation for CONSULTANT’s performance of the Services, including reimbursement of expenses, and CONSULTANT will be required to reimburse CITY for any sums paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, in addition to the foregoing, penalties for violating Government Code §1090 may include criminal prosecution and disqualification from holding public office in the State of California.
Any violation by CONSULTANT of the requirements of this provision will constitute a material breach of this Agreement, and the CITY reserves all its rights and remedies at law and equity concerning any such violations.
7.2. Subcontracting. CONSULTANT may subcontract portions of the Services upon the prior written approval of CITY. CONSULTANT will be solely responsible for payment of such subcontract Services. No contractual relationship will exist between any such subcontractors of CONSULTANT and CITY. CONSULTANT’s subcontractors agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under the Agreement. CONSULTANT’s subcontractors further agree to include the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, with any subsubcontractor to the extent they apply to the scope of the subsubcontractor’s work. A copy of the CITY indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to CONSULTANT’s subcontractors upon request.
7.3. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may only be modified by an amendment in writing signed by each party.
7.4. No Assignment. The Services are deemed unique and neither party shall assign, transfer, subcontract or otherwise substitute its interest in this Agreement or any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party. As limited by this Section 7.2, this Agreement is to be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
7.5. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is determined to be unconstitutional, invalid or beyond the authority of either party, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement can be interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.
7.6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and, when fully signed, such counterparts shall have the same effect as if signed in one document.
7.7. Choice of Law. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without reference to its choice of laws principles and venue shall be in the appropriate court in San Mateo County, California.
7.8. Waiver. No failure on the part of either Party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder. A waiver by
5.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete - 8 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
either CITY or CONSULTANT of any breach of this Agreement shall not be binding upon the waiving party unless such waiver is in writing. In the event of a written waiver, such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party's rights with respect to any other further breach.
7.9. Mediation. In the event the parties are unable to resolve a dispute arising under this Agreement through good faith negotiations, the parties agree to submit the matter to mediation with a mutually agreeable mediator. Prior to the mediation, the parties shall exchange any documents reasonably necessary to resolve the matter to be mediated.
7.10. Attorney’s Fees. If any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.
7.11. Interpretation. In the event this Agreement is ever construed in any dispute between the parties, it and each of its provisions shall be construed without regard to the party or parties responsible for its preparation and shall be deemed to have been prepared jointly by the parties. The rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement.
7.12. Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of one of the parties represents that he or she is duly authorized to sign and deliver the Agreement on behalf of such party and that this Agreement is binding on such party in accordance with its terms.
7.13. Third Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with, or cause of action in favor of, a third party against either the CITY or CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT’s Services hereunder are being performed solely for the benefit of CITY. CITY shall be an express third-party beneficiary of all contracts between CONSULTANT and any subcontractors or subconsultants in connection with any services performed in connection with, or in furtherance of, this Agreement.
5.b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete - 9 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.
CITY OF PACIFICA
By:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
CONSULTANT: WILSEY HAM
Date
By:
Brandon Davis, Principal Engineer/Executive Vice
President
Date
By: Date
Attest:
By: ___________________________
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
Approved As To Form:
By:
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
5.b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete
EXHIBIT A
TASK ORDER
5.b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete - 2 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
TASK ORDER NO. ________
CITY OF PACIFICA
AND
__________________________
SECTION 1 – PURPOSE
The purpose of this Task Order is to authorize and direct _______________ to proceed with the work specified in SECTION 2 below, in accordance with the provisions of the Master Agreement for Consultant Services between the City of Pacifica (“CITY”) and _______________ (“CONSULTANT”) hereto dated ________________ (“MASTER AGREEMENT”)
SECTION 2 – SCOPE OF WORK
The items authorized by this Task Order are presented in Attachment “A” – Scope of Services, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
SECTION 3 – COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT
Compensation shall be as provided in the MASTER AGREEMENT. Compensation for services as set forth in SECTION 2 shall be as set forth in Attachment “B” – Compensation, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. Total compensation for all services provided under this Task Order shall not exceed ____________________ ($____________) (“Cost Ceiling”).
SECTION 4 – TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The services described in SECTION 2 of this Task Order shall be completed by _________________ or as extended in writing by the City Manager.
SECTION 5 – ITEMS AND CONDITIONS
All terms and conditions contained in the MASTER AGREEMENT are incorporated by reference and remain in full force and effect.
Approved this _______ day of _____, _______.
[Signatures on Next Page]
5.b
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete -
3-
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
CITY OF PACIFICA
By:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
Approved As To Form
By:
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
_______________________________
Date
By:
Date
By: Date
5.b
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete -
4-
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
ATTACHMENT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
5.b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete -
5-
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
ATTACHMENT “B”
COMPENSATION
5.b
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete TASK ORDER NO. 1
CITY OF PACIFICA AND
WILSEY HAM
SECTION 1 – PURPOSE
The purpose of this Task Order is to authorize and direct Wilsey Ham to proceed with the work specified in SECTION 2 below, in accordance with the provisions of the Master Agreement for Consultant Services between the City of Pacifica (“CITY”) and Wilsey Ham, (“CONSULTANT”) hereto dated March 27, 2023 (“MASTER AGREEMENT”)
SECTION 2 – SCOPE OF WORK
The items authorized by this Task Order are presented in Attachment “A” – Scope of Services, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
SECTION 3 – COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT
Compensation shall be as provided in the MASTER AGREEMENT. Compensation for services as set forth in SECTION 2 shall be as set forth in Attachment “B” – Compensation, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. Total compensation for all services provided under this Task Order shall not exceed Sixty-Five Thousand One Hundred Twenty and zero /100 ($65,120.00) (“Cost Ceiling”).
SECTION 4 – TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The services described in SECTION 2 of this Task Order shall be completed within 180 working days or as extended in writing by the City Engineer.
SECTION 5 – ITEMS AND CONDITIONS
All terms and conditions contained in the MASTER AGREEMENT are incorporated by reference and remain in full force and effect.
Approved this 27th day of March 2023.
CITY OF PACIFICA
By: Date: __________________
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
Approved As To Form:
By: Date: __________________
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
CONSULTANT: WILSEY HAM
By: Date: __________________
Brandon Davis, Principal Engineer / Executive Vice President
5.b
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete ATTACHMENT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
5.b
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete March 21, 2023
Mr. Raymund Donguines, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
City of Pacifica – Engineering Division
151 Milagra Drive
Pacifica, CA 94044
Re: Proposal for City of Pacifica 2023/24 Concrete Improvements Project (Revised) Dear Mr. Donguines,
On behalf of Wilsey Ham, I am pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Pacifica (City) for the Concrete Improvement Project. We have a complete and thorough understanding of the scope of work and a project approach that is cost effective while providing the construction management expertise necessary for a successful project. Wilsey Ham understands our service is only as good as the people who are on the job every day managing construction. Our inspector will typically spend three to four hours in the field and one to two hours of document control and coordination time in the office. Our Construction Manager will average about one and a half hours a day on the project with additional time for pre-construction and closeout duties. Our team features experienced, proactive and responsive construction management professionals who will provide exceptional construction management service to the City. Wilsey Ham’s team will be augmented by key staff from our sister company Richard Brady & Associates (BRADY).
Firm Experience in Similar Projects
2017/2018 Annual Slurry Seal Project, City of Carlsbad, CA BRADY provided full construction management and inspection services for the City’s 2017-18 Annual Slurry Seal Project. The project extended the life of streets by resurfacing the existing pavement with asphaltic emulsion-aggregate slurry. BRADY was responsible for mark-out and tracking the bid quantity item for two-inch depth AC cold mill and verifying quantities for payment.
Inspection and QA/QC services included, crack sealing monitoring, AC temperature and compaction monitoring, traffic loop replacement, traffic control, and striping. Contract value:
$288,300.
As-Needed Construction Management Services, City of San Diego, CA BRADY provided full construction management and inspection services for various projects for the City of San Diego’s public works department. Projects included water and sewer lines, roadway reconstruction, roadway resurfacing, repair and replacement of curb, gutter, and sidewalks, as well as other public infrastructure. Services included construction management, resident engineering, and inspection as the City’s representative to the construction contractors and public. Contract value: $2.5 Million.
As-Needed Horizontal Construction Management and Inspection Services, City of Carlsbad, CA BRADY provided construction administration, construction management and inspection services to support and represent the City in the administration of Private Development projects. Private Development projects typically included developer provided public infrastructure to support new
5.b
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete March 21, 2023
Raymund Donguines, PE
development, water and sewer facilities, roadway improvements, storm drains, street lighting, sidewalks, etc. Services included monitoring and plan compliance of private development permit requirements, enforcement of local and state standards and regulations, mitigation, and administration of subdivision and grading improvements. Contract Value: $300,000 Project Team and Staff Resumes
Our team brings unparalleled local horizontal construction management and inspection experience to the City for this project. Mr. Christopher Dull, PE, will serve as the Senior Construction Manager overseeing all services provided. Chris has more than 30 years of experience in Public Works design and construction management.
Andres Uranga, EIT will serve as the
Construction Manager with Dave Brady as
the Inspector. Andres has 9 years of design
and construction experience with roadway
work including paving, sidewalks, curbs and
ADA curb ramps. Dave has more than 15
years of construction inspection experience
and is a Qualified Storm Water Professional
(QSP). Table 1-1 to the right summarizes
the names and positions of key team
members who will be responsible for
performing construction management and inspection services for the City. Resumes are attached at the end of this proposal.
Scope and Approach
We believe that a successful project begins by collaborating with the City and tailoring Wilsey Ham construction management services to the City’s construction policies, practices and procedures. The next step is to identify the City’s internal and external project stakeholders and strategize with the City to proactively meet their needs during construction. By investing in our team through training and mentoring we develop leaders who enjoy resolving construction project challenges. We have delivered numerous award-winning street improvements, water/wastewater facilities, neighborhood parks, and public building projects through effective construction management services. The Wilsey Ham team approach highlighted below embraces our core values and aligns with the City’s construction management needs. Develop a strong team approach and work collaboratively with project stakeholders including citizen groups, permitting agencies, local businesses and residents to address their needs before they are impacted by construction.
Keep the City informed with reliable cost, budget, and project information, and work to resolve issues quickly.
Table 1-1 Construction Management Team
Name Role
Christopher Dull, PE Senior Construction
Manager
Andres Uranga, EIT Construction Manager
David Brady, CWI, QSP Inspector
BSK Geotech/Materials
Testing
5.b
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete March 21, 2023
Raymund Donguines, PE
We are dedicated to protecting the City’s interests and adding value from the pre-construction meeting to project closeout. Our approach creates value through focused constructability reviews, meticulous document control, quality assurance, and coordinated project close-out. We take great pride in completing high quality projects that are celebrated by the community.
Proactive Management Approach
Early and often communication with the City, design team, contractor and stakeholders resolves many project issues before they become problems and minimizes delays and claims. We proactively address the concerns of neighbors, stakeholders, and users.
Maintain Effective Communication
Constant contact with the City throughout the contract duration will keep us abreast of upcoming personnel needs, and help us provide guidance and support to our construction management and inspection staff. We also recognize that the citizens of Pacifica are our customers and that construction projects at times cause inconvenience to the general public. As your RE/inspector in the Field, we work closely with the City’s
Public Information Staff to keep the
community updated on project status and
aware of activities that might
inconvenience the public. We will also
document any complaints we receive onsite and work with the City and the contractor to resolve them.
Document Control
We use project control systems that
integrate cost and schedule, manage the
flow of construction documents and help the City clearly understand what is happening on the project. Utilizing a system that tracks the Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule and detailed dayto-day project correspondence gives visibility to critical items and tasks. We use real-time cloudbased document control software to ensure transparency and accountability.
Daily Inspection Reports
Disputes and claims avoidance begins with complete and accurate Daily Inspection Reports. We prepare daily inspection reports that represent the chronology of the contractor’s activities, workforce, equipment, and material deliveries. We document possible construction issues and corrections as discussed with the contractor. Detailed and complete daily inspection reports coupled with photo documentation provide documentation to protect the City from unnecessary delay charges and claims. Our Lead Construction Manager audits our RE/inspectors Daily reports to ensure they are in compliance with City and Wilsey Ham standards.
5.b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete March 21, 2023
Raymund Donguines, PE
Schedule Control
Wilsey Ham’s team understands the importance of using a Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule for maintaining a project schedule. Managing schedule milestones is a crucial tool for early identification of schedule risks and decision making.
Our team is trained to identify the critical path on a project and identify tasks that drive milestones and completion dates. In establishing the baseline schedule, our experienced team reviews for logical construction durations
and sequencing. We also require
that the schedule shows key
milestones and contractual
requirements for items such as
submittal review and delivery of
long lead items, City force work,
environmental mitigation and
restrictions, along with testing,
start-up, and close-out. Nearterm schedule management in weekly construction progress
meeting allows us to effectively
schedule geotechnical and materials testing inspections and to communicate construction management team staffing needs to the City.
QA/QC
Our high-quality approach has earned the respect of our clients, the community, users of the facilities, and the design professionals and contractors with whom we work. We take a proactive approach to identify and resolve potential issues early to improve quality and avoid rework.
Our experienced RE/inspectors are onsite to inspect the work taking place each day, and to talk with the contractor about what’s next. Looking ahead at the contractor’s work plan is an effective way to identify potential issues and
resolve them before the work takes
place. The quality of rework based
on a Contractor’s mistake is never
as good as getting it right the first
time. We begin each project by
developing a thorough
understanding of the project
construction documents, permits,
and project schedule. This allows us
to focus on near term activities while
also focusing on activities that may
impact the critical path. To help us regulate contract conformance, our RE/inspector develops material and performance checklists from the contract documents. We develop material,
5.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete March 21, 2023
Raymund Donguines, PE
equipment, and performance checklists to maintain quality on virtually all types of projects, pump stations, AC paving, park facilities, and complex structures. Wilsey Ham RE/inspectors will provide QA and check for materials, methods, and work results. Installation of key elements will be checked for conformance to material, equipment, temperature, and compaction.
Traffic Control
Working in the City’s Public right-of-way requires a “Public Right-of-Way Permit for Traffic Control”. Throughout our RE/inspection task assignments, we will coordinate with the City to keep the public informed of lane closures, construction detours, parking restrictions, and other issues affecting the public.
We review the installation of the contractor’s traffic control devices prior to the construction of each stage or detour and then monitor them closely to verify they meet the requirements of the plans and site conditions. Immediately after setup, we verify the traffic control for safety and conformance with the plan and, if left in place, we also drive and review the traffic control setup at the end of the day. We immediately have the contractor correct any discrepancies between the traffic control setup and the approved plan.
Storm Water Protection
Protecting our watershed and waterfront begins with keeping construction debris and erosion on site and outside the storm drain system. Our team is trained to enforce the requirements of the storm water regulations and City requirements with regards to implementation and maintenance of required minimum designated construction Best Management Practices (BMP), including housekeeping, erosion control, and protection of the storm water conveyance system. Wilsey Ham will observe the contractor’s work area for
general compliance with the Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) BMPs and
notify the contractor if the pollution prevention
controls are not in accordance with the SWPPP.
Failure to revise and correct conditions will be
cause to have the City take corrective action. We
have trained QSD/QSP certified staff with
experience in entering and monitoring SWPPPs
within the State Multiple Application Reporting
and Tracking System (SMARTS).
We take a proactive approach by closely
monitoring the local weather and discussing BMPs in the weekly contractor meetings. Throughout our inspection services with the City, we protect the local watershed and the City from potential Notice of Violations for non-compliance with the Municipal Storm Water Permit.
Public Awareness and Knowledge of the Local Community
Improving our neighborhood streets and work in the public right-of-way result in inconvenience to
5.b
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete March 21, 2023
Raymund Donguines, PE
the public from time to time. We recognize the importance of keeping the community and City management informed of unusual construction events or potential disruption to the public's daily events. Our team has experience working in various communities and experience working with project neighbors and local community groups. We can attend public meetings to provide project updates and presentations to the public, local community groups as needed by the City.
Scope of Services
Task 1 – Project Coordination
1. Perform document control tasks;
2. Coordinate with independent consultants retained by the City for the Project, including: design engineer, labor compliance consultant, and any other consulting services required for the duration of the Project;
3. Coordinate geotechnical inspections/testing. Wilsey Ham’s services relating to Geotechnical Inspections/Testing for the Project are further detailed in Task 5 below;
4. Coordinate, review, observe, and document equipment testing and start up, if applicable;
5. Coordinate with the City, independent consultants, and stakeholders to facilitate good communications with the Project contractor and good record keeping practices.
Task 2 – Inspection
1. Monitor Project permit conditions (e.g. City encroachment permit) and the respective expiration dates for each Project permit. Inform the City and Project contractor when noncompliance is observed as it relates to the Project permit requirements;
2. Monitor the Project contractor’s work for compliance with Project specifications and drawings requirements, the City’s Standard Detail drawings, agency encroachment permits, and all other pertinent standards, requirements, and documents associated with the Project; and
3. Monitor Project contractor’s schedule each week and inform the City of any construction conflicts and issues that could potentially delay the project.
Task 3 – Document Control and Record Keeping
1. Employ forms to prepare, process, and file (in PDF format) all construction phase documents and records, providing complete Project records during the course of the Project and at Project completion.
2. Examples of document control and record keeping include, but are not limited to:
a. Preparation of written daily field reports for submittal to the City. Reports will include work performed, labor and equipment utilized, and a discussion of any work not conforming to the plans and specifications;
b. Collect the Project contractor’s daily reports. Compare the Project contractor’s daily reports to Wilsey Ham’s daily inspection reports so any discrepancies can be addressed in a timely manner. Approved reports will be filed in the manner requested by the City. c. Daily photographic documentation of construction activities in digital format. Photo file size shall conform to City file requirements. Photos shall be uploaded to the City on a daily or weekly basis;
5.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete March 21, 2023
Raymund Donguines, PE
d. Observe and record all major materials deliveries to the Project site to confirm compliance with the Project specifications and approved shop drawings; e. Review and upload all geotechnical reports provided by those firms contracted through Wilsey Ham pursuant to Task 1 and Task 5;
f. Review and upload all other Project documents,
reports, and correspondence, including shop
drawings, submittals, requests for information
(“RFI”), Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
("SWPPP”) inspections reports, permit documents,
environmental monitoring reports and training
documentation, labor compliance monitoring reports
and correspondence, community complaints and
documentation of contact and resolution,
geotechnical and materials testing reports, and
special inspections;
g. During the Project’s construction phase, review and
update Project red line drawings and provide final
reviews and approval of the Project contractor’s red
line drawings at Project completion. Submit final,
Wilsey Ham-approved Project contractor red line
drawings to the City;
h. Provide Project records meeting the City’s quality assurance/quality control standards. (Questionable audit results can negatively impact the City’s future funding opportunities.
Most project documentation is considered public record and is potentially subject to a highlevel of scrutiny.)
3. We will use the City’s file management system. All documents produced in that file management system, as well as documents received from the Project contractor, will be saved as PDFs and filed to the City on a regular (daily or weekly) basis, so that the City’s Construction Management staff has access to all project related documents at all times.
Task 4 –Construction Management
1. Confirm adherence to this Agreement, the Project contractor’s contract documents, and the Project plans and specifications;
2. Attend a preliminary meeting with the City and labor compliance consultant to review Project documentation requirements;
3. Lead the pre-construction meeting and participate as the Project construction manager;
4. Manage, route, and track all submittals and RFIs, to the City’s design engineer. Coordinate with the City’s design engineer, as needed, on all change orders, field orders, and time and material requests;
5. At the City’s request, provide professional opinions to the City relating to field construction issues, determining entitlement of compensation to the Project contractor for differing site conditions, change in scope items, negotiating all change order work, mitigating construction claims resolutions, and providing appropriate responses to the Project contractor regarding such issues, on behalf of the City;
5.b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete March 21, 2023
Raymund Donguines, PE
6. Clearly document all details and calculations in written field orders and change orders, providing compliance for future audits by various funding entities;
7. Monitor the Project contractor’s adherence to Project schedule and notify the City’s PM of issues that might impact the CPM;
8. Review the Project contractor’s monthly progress payment estimates and confirm that percentages and quantities of work completed align with the amounts requested for payment.
Provide a thorough review for accuracy and comparison with actual work completed. Meet with the City to discuss the progress pay application and confirm that all check list items are complete, including labor compliance issues, prior to submittal to the City. Make appropriate recommendations to the City on payment issues;
9. Track preliminary notices forwarded by City staff, collect and file appropriate releases from contractor, and file appropriate and necessary releases upon Project completion;
10. Conduct and coordinate preliminary and final walk-throughs for the punch lists, start up and testing, and closeout. Confirm all deliverables have been reviewed, approved, and delivered to the appropriate City staff;
11. Submit detailed monthly CM services invoices.
Task 5 – Subcontract Management – Geotechnical Inspection Services
1. Include and manage the following as part
of the CM services:
a. Schedule testing for geotechnical
support as needed. Geotechnical
support services include:
i. Compaction testing of base repair;
ii. Submitting field reports and lab test
reports to the CM; and
2. As part of the CM fee, a line-item
allowance of $14,858 has been added for
geotechnical services. This allowance was
estimated on a time and materials basis,
not to exceed $14,858 without written
authorization from the City.
Understanding of Potential Issues
During construction of any project in the public right-of-way produces inconvenience for the public.
Resurfacing roadways is a particular inconvenience due to the removal of traffic lane(s) availability. To this end our team will work with the construction contractor to minimize inconvenience to the public. A few potential issues we see are as follows:
1. Actual dimensions of the work are to be field verified by the contractor prior to start of construction. It is important to formally meet with the contractor before work begins to agree on actual dimensions prior to work beginning. This helps protect the City from future claims of additional work by the contractor.
2. Measurement of the amount of slurry placed can often be contentious. It is important to agree to the acceptable method and units of measurement prior to start of construction.
5.b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete March 21, 2023
Raymund Donguines, PE
3. Weed abatement. If there are weeds growing through the cracks in the street and abatement is not addressed, there can be issues of responsibility when the contractor begins placing slurry.
4. Maintaining access. The project involves streets in a residential neighborhood as well as a church and school. Most of the streets are rather narrow with limited space available for staging equipment and materials. The contractor’s work will need to coordinated adjacent to the school to avoid any congestion during drop off and pick up by performing this work early in the contract performance period before the school year begins.
5. Public communication and coordination. There is a preponderance of vehicles parked on the streets associated with this project. A coordinated effort between the City, CM, and contractor will be essential to allow for proper resident notification of parking restrictions while not impeding the progress of the work.
6. Existing striping removal. Wherever striping is removed, it should be done with wet sand blasting and no grinding wheel should be allowed. The grinding “dust” will be difficult to manage and will likely hold up progress.
Fee and Schedule
Wilsey Ham's fee for the Scope of Services described above is attached to this letter. Our fees will be charged on a time and materials basis and are estimated to be $65,120. We will not exceed this amount without your prior authorization. Work will be completed in accordance with the schedule provided in the Contract Documents.
Assumptions and Exclusions
1. This proposal is based on a 25 working day construction duration with our inspector working five and a half (5.5) hours per day, with four (4) hours of field inspection and one and a half hours of office time coordinating and performing document control. We have also included an additional week of office time for project reporting and closeout. Additional fees may be required if these durations are extended.
We appreciate the opportunity to participate on your project.
Very truly yours,
WILSEY HAM
A California Corporation
Brandon Davis
Principal Engineer
Executive Vice President
RCE: C61024
Attached: Resumes
Fee Estimate
5.b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Attachment A
– Resumes
5.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete
CITY OF PACIFICA
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGE
FOR ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 | P a g e
FORM C – RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL
1. Name: Brandon S. Davis
2. Role in this Service Area: Principal Engineer
3. Years of experience – Total: 25 With current firm: 25
4. Education (Degree and Specialization) California State University, Chico, B.S. Civil Engineering
5. Current Registration/Certification (State & Discipline) Civil Engineer, RCE #61024, California
6.Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Qualified SWPPP Practitioner/Developer, National Stormwater Summit, ABAG NPDES Erosion Control Seminar, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Stormwater Quality Control Training _
7. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): Sanitary Sewer Main Rehabilitation, Daly City, CA - Year Completed – Professional Services: 2018
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2018
- Brief Description (Scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: The project replaced roughly 3,000 linear feet of sanitary sewer main on several streets in Daly City. Design for the project evaluated the opportunity to use trenchless methods by identifying suitable areas for equipment and material staging. Both traditional open trench and pipe bursting were used as installation methods. The project cost $1.4 Million. Role: PM/ EOR. Brandon oversaw WH's design team in the preparation of bid docs providing technical assistance, quality control and maintaining schedule and budgets. - Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes No
8. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): South Rollins Utility Improvements, Burlingame, CA - Year Completed – Professional Services: 2020
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2017 Phase I/ 2018 Phase II/ Phase III 2020 - Brief Description (Scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: Wilsey Ham has been working with the City of Burlingame on Water Resources Utility Projects for many years. Phases I & II had 3,700 & 4,300 linear feet of sewer and water main piping respectively. Phase III has 6,500 feet of sewer and water piping including a portion on the Anza Lagoon Bridge that will be slip-lined. Work has included review for use of pipe bursting in lieu of traditional open cut methods. Role: Project Manager / Engineer of Record.
- Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes No
9. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): Oak Springs Storm Water Improvements, Orinda, CA - Year Completed – Professional Services: 2018
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2018
- Brief Description (Scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: The storm drainage pipe at the end of Candlestick Road day-lighted at the top of a 250-foot high 2:1 slope above Highway 24 in Orinda. WH was the team hired by the City to study alternatives and prepare construction documents. We studied alternative designs to reduce mitigate the severe erosion that was occurring while maintaining drainage flows within the same watershed and minimizing impacts to the planned subdivision. The work required coordination with ACOE, CDFW, RWQCB and Caltrans. Role: Project Manager/ Engineer of Record. Brandon oversaw WH's design team in the preparation of bid docs providing technical assistance, quality control and maintaining schedule and budgets. - Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes No
5.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete
CITY OF PACIFICA
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGE
FOR ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2 | P a g e
FORM C – RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL
1. Name: Christopher Dull
2. Role in this ServiceArea: Principal Construction Manager
3. Years of experience – Total: 32 With currentfirm: 1
4. Education (Degree and Specialization) University of California, Irvine, BS Civil Engineering
5. CurrentRegistration/Certification (State&Discipline) Civil Engineer, CA #48996; NV #25328
6. OtherProfessionalQualifications(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Construction Management Association of America, American Water Works Association, American Society of Civil Engineers
7. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): SDCWA On-Call CM & Inspection, San Diego, CA - Year Completed – Professional Services: 2021
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2021
- Brief Description (Scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: As needed construction management and inspection services on a variety of CIP projects including 96-in diameter water line in a tunnel, lining existing 66- and 69- PCCP water line with a new steel liner, replacement of an existing steel water reservoir with a new 2.1 MG prestressed concrete reservoir, existing pump station rehabilitation, and other related projects. CM, RE, Inspection, and Document Control services provided. CM fee on this contract totals $2.5 Million. Role: Project Manager
- Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes ☒ No ☐
8. Relevant Project – Title& Location (City & State): City of San Diego As Needed CM and Inspection, San Diego, CA
- Year Completed – Professional Services: 2020
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2020
- Brief Description (Scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: Our team provided construction management, resident engineering, inspection, and document control on a variety of CIP projects including water and sewer pipelines, roadway construction and repair, and pump stations. CM fee on this contract was $15 Million. Role: Principal in Charge
- Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes ☐ No ☒
9. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): SDCWA On Call CM & Inspection, San Diego, CA - Year Completed – Professional Services: 2018
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2018
-BriefDescription (Scope,size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: Our team provided construction management, resident engineering, inspection, and document control on a variety of CIP projects including large diameter steel water pipelines, pump stations, flow control facilities, pipeline relining, hydroelectric pumped storage, and other similar facilities. CM fee on this contract was $15.75 Million. Role: Project Manager
- Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes ☐ No ☒
5.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete
CITY OF PACIFICA
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGE
FOR ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3 | P a g e
FORM C – RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL
1. Name: Andres Uranga
2. Role in this ServiceArea: Engineer I
3. Years of experience – Total: 9 With currentfirm: 1
4. Education (Degree and Specialization) BS Civil Engineering
5. CurrentRegistration/Certification (State&Discipline) Engineer in Training (E.I.T.), #159171, California
6. OtherProfessionalQualifications(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Cal OSHA 10-Hour Training
7. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): Ralston CIPR Pavement, Belmont, CA - Year Completed – Professional Services: Ongoing (currently in 100% PS&E) - Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): N/A
- BriefDescription (Scope,size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: Project Engineering responsible for design of Cold-in-Place Recycling (CIPR) pavement along the project corridor. The project also included updating accessible crosswalk to meet current standards. Total project length is 4,600 feet. - Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes ☒ No ☐
8. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): Bay Corridor Transmission and Distribution Phase 2, San Francisco, CA
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2022
- Brief Description (Scope,size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: Project consisted of the construction of a new 2,000 linear foot underground electrical duct bank. Conducted daily site visits as a Construction Quality Assurance Inspector ensuring the project complied with project drawings and specifications.
Monitored excavation of existing streets, installation of HDPE conduit, backfill, and re-paving activities. Inspected the construction of four new ADA curb ramps. - Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes ☐ No ☒
9. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): Curb Ramp Retrofits, San Francisco, CA - Year Completed – Professional Services: Ongoing (currently in the post construction monitoring phase)
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2022
- Brief Description (Scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: As civil design engineer, assisted the Department of Public Works (SFDPW) in the design and construction of retrofits to the existing city sidewalks, curbs, sewer lines, and streets. Completed the design and drafting for more than 50 intersections. Also assisted the city with the coordination of utility adjustments, cost estimates, preparation of plans, and follow-up with engineering support during construction. - Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes ☐ No ☒
5.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete
CITY OF PACIFICA
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGE
FOR ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4 | P a g e
FORM C – RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL
1. Name: David Brady
2. Role in this ServiceArea: Inspector/Certified Welding Inspector
3. Years of experience – Total: 30 With currentfirm: 1
4. Education (Degree and Specialization) Bob Jones University, BS Physics and Engineering Services
5. CurrentRegistration/Certification (State&Discipline) California Qualified Stormwater Practitioner
6. OtherProfessionalQualifications(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) AWS Certified Welding Inspector
7. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): Old Otay Mesa Road Widening, San Diego, CA - Year Completed – Professional Services: 2018
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2018
- Brief Description (Scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: Provided construction administration and inspection for the widening of a 2,600-foot section of an existing road to increase safety. In addition to the road widening the project included relocating existing storm drain facilities, installation of a new 24- inch water main, soil anchors and retaining walls. Responsibilities included managing submittal and RFI process, leading construction progress meetings, coordinating contractor schedule, reviewing and negotiating change orders, inspecting contractor’s work, and scheduling special inspection services. CM fee for this contract totaled $850,000. Role: Construction Administrator and Inspector. - Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes ☐ No ☒
8. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): Catalina Blvd. Water Main Replacement, San Diego, CA
- Year Completed – Professional Services: 2019
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2019
- Brief Description (Scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: Provided construction administration and inspection for 8,700 LF of 24-inch steel and 6,800 LF of 16-inch PVC water lines. Responsibilities included managing submittal and RFI process, leading construction progress meetings, coordinating contractor schedule, reviewing and negotiating change orders, inspecting contractor’s work, and scheduling special inspection services. CM fee for this contract totaled $1.5 Million. Role: Construction Administrator and Inspector.
- Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes ☐ No ☒
9. Relevant Project – Title & Location (City & State): Regents Road Widening, San Diego, CA - Year Completed – Professional Services: 2017
- Year Completed – Construction (if applicable): 2017
- Brief Description (Scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role: Provided construction administration and inspection for the widening of 2,000 feet of existing Regents Road with the addition of turn pockets. The project included extensive utility relocations and coordination with the various utility organizations.
Responsibilities included representing the City to community stakeholders, managing submittal and RFI process, leading construction progress meetings, coordinating contractor schedule, reviewing and negotiating change orders, inspecting contractor’s work, and scheduling special inspection services. CM fee for this contract totaled $600,000. Role: Construction Administrator and Inspector. - Performed Relevant Project with Current Firm: Yes ☐ No ☒
5.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete ATTACHMENT “B”
COMPENSATION
5.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete Attachment B
– Fee Proposal
5.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and Wilsey Ham (5304 : FY 2023-24 Concrete BSK
1 REIM- TOTAL TOTAL
SUB- BURSABLE WH TOTAL WH LABOR
TASK DESCRIPTION $325 HRS $195 HRS $175 HRS CONSULTANTS EXPENSES LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS
1. CM, Inspection, & Testing Services
1 Project Coordination 3,900 20 1,313 8 100 5,213 5,313 28 2 Inspection 24,500 140 700 24,500 25,200 140
3 Document Control and Record Keeping 4,375 25 4,375 4,375 25 4 Construction Management 6,500 20 7,800 40 200 14,300 14,500 60 5 Subcontract Management – Geotechnical Inspection Services 875 5 14,858 875 15,733 5 6,500 20 11,700 60 31,063 178 14,858 1,000 49,263 65,120 258 6,500 20 11,700 60 31,063 178 14,858 1,000 49,263 65,120 258 Notes:
C. Dull A. Uranga D. Brady
3/21/2023
PROJECT
ENGINEER (CM)
INSPECTOR
4. All positions may not be shown. If a position is not shown the Charge Rate Fee Schedule will govern.
GRAND TOTAL
1. The amounts may vary between tasks and individuals but the Grand Total amount will not be exceeded without approval of the Client.
2. Total All$ includes subconsultants and reimbursable costs.
3. Hourly rates effective through December 31, 2023 and subject to revision annually thereafter.
City of Pacifica
FY 2023-24 Concrete Improvements Project: CM, Inspection, & Testing Services Fee Proposal (Revised)
Subtotal
PRINCIPAL
CM
5.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt a Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving the Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. in an amount not to exceed $1,568,829.20 and a Master Services Agreement and Task Order No. 1 with CSG Consultants, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $149,360.00; Authorize a budget authority in the amount of $1,975,917.00, which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the Construction Contract amounts; Authorize staff to Execute Future Change Orders and Task Orders not to exceed the contingency amount; and Authorize the Designated Personnel to Sign Contract Documents related to the FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project.” STAFF CONTACT:
Raymund Donguines, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
(650) 738-3768
[email protected]
Roland Yip, P.E., DPW Deputy Director
(650) 738-3771
[email protected]
Lisa Petersen, P.E., DPW Director
(650) 738-3770
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On October 12, 2020, the City Council accepted the City’s 5-year Street Maintenance Program for FY 2020-21 through FY 2024-25. As noted during the October 2020 Council meeting, the main goal of the City’s five-year pavement maintenance program is to both keep good streets in good condition and use a stop gap measure to prevent poor condition streets from falling into expensive reconstructions. A slurry seal (mixture of asphalt oil, water, and coarse sand) is used on good streets to keep them that way. This is the most cost-effective form of street maintenance. Cape seals (asphalt oil and small aggregate covered with a slurry seal) can be used as an inexpensive stop gap measure to keep poor streets from dropping into worse condition with targeted spot pavement repairs.
The FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project will resurface approximately 7.72 miles (28 street sections) of City pavement and follows the Council approved 5-year Street Maintenance Program. The type of treatments used generally follow the 5-year pavement program with the exception of value engineering changes made by the pavement consultant to allow for project cost savings. These value engineering changes will allow the City to treat all the streets identified under the City’s FY 2023-24 pavement program. These changes include using two 6 Packet Pg. 92
Pacifica City Council 2
March 27, 2023
coats of slurry seal in place of a cape seal on appropriate streets and using a spot treatment called microsurfacing (similar to a thick slurry seal) to address areas of pavement distress. The overall project scope will include roadway cape seals, double slurry seals, slurry seals, asphalt concrete grinding and paving, microsurfacing base repairs, pavement striping and markings and other miscellaneous related work. The project will be funded by money the City receives from SB 1, Measure W and Measure A (Fund 09).
On September 26, 2022, the City Council approved Task Order No. 1 between the City of Pacifica and NCE for Design and Engineering Services related to the FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project. The project will resurface streets generally in the Manor District and northern part of Pacifica (see Attachment “C” - Project Plans and Street List). A portion of Manor Drive and Monterey Road will receive a 2-inch asphalt overlay. Sections of Conchita Ct., Cragmont Ct., Del Mar Ave., Fremont Ave., Glasgow Dr., Glencourt Way, Hacienda Ct., Heathcliff Dr., Hibbert Ct., Inverness Dr., Johnson Ave., Lorry Ln., Manor Dr., Milagra Dr., Miller Ave., Monterey Rd., Nelson Ave., Norfolk Dr., Perry Ave, Vista Mar Ave. will receive a cape seal with base repair. Arroyo Dr., Avalon Dr., Edgemar Ave., Lewis Ln., Manor Dr., Nelson Ave. will receive a slurry seal. The project plans are also available to view on the City's website at:
<https://www.cityofpacifica.org/departments/public-works/engineering/capital-improvementprojects>. NCE has been working in the Bay Area since 1990 and is highly regarded for their expertise in pavement design and rehabilitation and for their work with the pavement research branch of the Federal Highways Administration.
The Project was advertised on February 8, 2023, and February 15, 2023, in accordance with the formal bid process. Twenty-six (26) companies requested plans and specifications and five (5) companies submitted bids. On March 9, 2023, the bid opening was held via Zoom by the City Clerk and the result is as follows:
Company Base Bid
Pavement Coatings Co. $1,568,829.20
Doolittle Construction LLC $1,598,598.00
VSS International, Inc. $1,660,120.00
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $1,709,960.77
O'Grady Paving Inc. $1,713,272.60
The apparent low bidder is Pavement Coatings Co. with a base bid amount of $1,568,829.20.
This is approximately 20% over the Engineer’s Estimate, which is related to the recent and ongoing fluctuation and uncertainty in oil prices that directly impacts pavement oils used for resurfacing. All required documentation was submitted with their bid. Pavement Coatings Co. has performed several of the City’s projects in the past and their work has been satisfactory. As there are sufficient project funds from SB1, Measure W and Measure A/Fund 09, the City Manager recommends the award of contract (Attachment "A") to the apparent low bidder, Pavement Coatings Co. In addition, a 15% contingency is recommended to allow enough funding to handle any additional improvements that are identified during construction. Staff recommends authorizing a budget authority for construction in the amount of $1,804,153.00, which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the Construction Services Agreement amount for any unforeseen conditions and/or additional street work required.
CSG Consultants, Inc., is a full-service engineering firm that specialize in local agency staff augmentation work including, construction management and inspection work. Not only do they have the expertise in construction inspection and management for this type of project but are 6 Packet Pg. 93
Pacifica City Council 3
March 27, 2023
also familiar with City standards. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between the City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. (Attachment "B"), for construction management, inspections, and material testing in the amount not to exceed $171,764, which includes contingencies in the amount not to exceed ten percent (15%) of Task Order No. 1 for any unforeseen conditions and/or additional street work required or requested by the City.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Council may choose not to adopt the resolution and not approve the construction contract.
However, this will result in project delays and possible increase in construction cost. Staff does not recommend this alternative action.
RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
Approval of the construction contract is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Stewardship of City Infrastructure: includes repairing/replacing outdated city facilities such as city hall, the libraries, fire stations, etc., improving streets, and responding to impacts of sea level rise. This construction project will improve existing City streets and roads.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The following is the source and use of funds for the project:
Total Project Source and Use of Funds
SB1 $956,000.00
Measure W $234,340.00
Measure A / Fund 09 $1,000,000.00
Total Source of Funds $2,190,340.00
FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project $1,975,917.00
Design and Engineering $161,700.00
Total Use of Funds $2,137,617.00
Project End Balance $52,723.00
The remaining funds will go back to Street Construction Fund 09 to fund future pavement resurfacing projects.
ORIGINATED BY:
Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. (PDF) 6 Packet Pg. 94
Pacifica City Council 4
March 27, 2023
Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. (PDF)
Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List (PDF)
6 Packet Pg. 95
Pacifica City Council 5
March 27, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. __-2023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,568,829.20 AND A MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT AND TASK ORDER NO. 1 WITH CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $149,360.00; AUTHORIZE A BUDGET AUTHORITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,975,917.00, WHICH INCLUDES CONTINGENCIES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED FIFTEEN PERCENT (15%) OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AMOUNTS; AUTHORIZE STAFF TO EXECUTE
FUTURE CHANGE ORDERS AND TASK ORDERS NOT TO EXCEED THE CONTINGENCY AMOUNT; AND AUTHORIZE THE DESIGNATED PERSONNEL TO SIGN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE FY 2023-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT.
WHEREAS, consistent with the City of Pacifica’s Bidding Procedures for Public Projects (Municipal Code Title 3 Chapter 15) the City of Pacifica advertised the Request for Bids for FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project on February 8, 2023, and February 15, 2023; and WHEREAS, the low bidder was Pavement Coatings Co.; and
WHEREAS, the City requested proposals from Engineering companies on the City’s OnCall List for the Construction Management, Inspection and Testing services; and WHEREAS, the City evaluated CSG Consultants, Inc. proposal, and is satisfied they can successfully complete the work and has been satisfied with their services on past City projects.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Governing Board of the City of Pacifica authorizes entering into the construction contract and agreement for the FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project and that the person/s who are listed below are authorized to sign the project contract documents for the Governing Board.
NAME TITLE SIGNATURE
Kevin Woodhouse City Manager _______________________
Lisa Petersen Director of Public Works _______________________ Roland Yip Deputy Director of Public Works _______________________ 6 Packet Pg. 96
Pacifica City Council 6
March 27, 2023
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 27th day of March, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Tygarjas Twyrls Bigstyck, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 6 Packet Pg. 97
CITY OF PACIFICA
540 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA 94044
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT
FY 2023-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT
DATE: MARCH 27, 2023
1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR:
CONTRACTOR: PAVEMENT COATINGS CO.
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO: 303609 CLASS: A - General Engineering Contractor
2. SCOPE OF THE WORK
See Scope of Work attached as Appendix A.
COMPENSATION FOR WORK. Contractor’s total compensation for the Work performed under this Agreement (Contract Sum) is $1,568,829.20 to be paid as (check one): (1) lump sum; (2) lump sum with progress payments; (3) per attached schedule of rates and charges, up to a guaranteed not-to-exceed amount of $__________. All payments (check one): shall shall not be subject to a five percent (5%) retention.
3. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE WORK. Contractor shall commence and complete the Work by the following dates:
Commencement Date shall be on the date established in the Notice to Proceed. Owner reserves the right to modify or alter the Commencement Date of the Work.
Substantial Completion Date: Within 60 working days of Commencement Date.
Final Completion Date: Within 60 working days of Substantial Completion.
3.01 Liquidated Damage Amounts.
A. As liquidated damages for delay Contractor shall pay Owner Four Thousand dollars ($4,000.00) for each Day that expires after the time specified herein for Contractor to achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work, until achieved.
B. As liquidated damages for delay Contractor shall pay Owner Four Thousand dollars ($4,000.00) for each Day that expires after the time specified herein for Contractor to achieve Final Completion of the entire Work, until achieved.
3.02 Scope of Liquidated Damages
Contractor and Owner agree that because of the nature of the Project, it would be impractical or extremely difficult to fix the amount of such actual damages incurred by Owner because of a delay in completion of all or any part of the Work. Contractor and Owner agree that specified measures of liquidated damages shall be presumed to be the amount of such damages actually sustained by ATTACHMENT "A" 6.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing
6.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23
-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT– Page 3 Addresses for Notices: Addresses for Notices:
Pavement Coatings Co. City of Pacifica
2150 Bell Avenue, Suite 125 540 Crespi Drive
Sacramento, CA 95838 Pacifica, CA 94044
6.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 4 Appendix A to Construction Services Agreement
SCOPE OF WORK
The project includes asphalt overlay, cape seal, rubberized chip seal, double slurry seal, slurry seal, microsurfacing, base repair, pavement striping and markings and other miscellaneous related work described in the Plans and Specifications entitled: FY 23-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project.
6.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 5 Appendix B to Construction Services Agreement
GENERAL CONDITIONS
ARTICLE 1 TERMS OF PERFORMANCE
Construction Services Agreement (Agreement) Force and Effect. The provisions of the Agreement and other Contract Documents constitute the entire agreement between the Contractor and Owner regarding the Work described herein. No representation, term or covenant not expressly specified in the Contract Documents shall be a part of the parties’ agreement. The Agreement and other Contract Documents shall govern the Work (whenever performed), and shall supersede all other purchase orders and agreements between Contractor and Owner, and any proposal, with respect to the Work.
Construction Performance Bond; Construction Labor and Materials Payment Bond; Securities in Lieu of Retention Escrow Account.
If Contract Sum under the Agreement exceeds (or is expected to exceed) $25,000, Contractor shall provide (i) a construction labor and material payment bond, in accordance with Civil Code Section 9550 and in form attached hereto Appendix D – Construction Labor and Materials Payment Bond, and (ii) a construction performance bond in form attached hereto as Appendix E – Construction Performance Bond. Contractor may not substitute cash in lieu of the required bond(s).
If the Agreement specifies performance retention, Contractor may elect to substitute securities or direct payment to an escrow account, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300 (incorporated herein by this reference).
Records and Payment Requests. Contractor shall submit all billings with all necessary invoices or other appropriate evidence of proper performance, after which Owner shall make payment within 30 days. Upon Owner’s written request, Contractor shall make available to Owner, its authorized agents, officers, or employees, any and all ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, cancelled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to the Work or the expenditures and disbursement charged to Owner, and all correspondence, internal memoranda, calculations, books and accounts, records documenting its Work under the Contract Documents, and invoices, payrolls, timecards, records and all other data related to matters covered by the Contract Documents.
Contractor shall furnish to Owner, its authorized agents, officers, or employees, such other evidence or information as Owner may require with regard to the Work or any such expenditure or disbursement charged by Contractor. Contractor shall maintain all such documents and records prepared by or furnished to Contractor during the course of performing the Work for at least five years following completion of the Work, except that all such items pertaining to hazardous materials shall be maintained for at least 30 years. Contractor shall permit Owner to audit, examine and make copies, excerpts and transcripts from such records. The State of California or any federal agency having an interest in the subject of the Contract Documents shall have the same rights conferred to Owner by this section. Such rights shall be specifically enforceable.
Use of Contract Documents and Other Information. Drawings, Specifications, and other Contract Documents are made available to Contractor solely for Contractor’s use under the Contract Documents. Further, all tangible and intangible property developed, produced and/or provided by Contractor under the Contract Documents, and all such items (other than Contract Documents) provided by Owner to Contractor in connection with the Contract Documents including, without limitation, drawings, specifications, sketches, models, samples, tools, computer programs, technical information, confidential business information, scripts, customer or personnel information and data, whether written, oral or otherwise (all hereinafter referred to as Information) shall be Owner’s sole property. Contractor may not use Contract Documents or Information for
6.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 6 any purpose unrelated to Contract Documents without Owner’s prior written consent. All copies of Information in written, graphic or other tangible form shall be delivered to Owner upon completion of Work, or earlier if otherwise provided in Contract Documents.
Performance of Work/No Assignment. Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work.
Contractor will perform the Work in a skillful and workmanlike manner; comply fully with criteria established by Owner, and with applicable laws, codes, and all applicable industry standards.
Contractor shall maintain its work area in a clean and sanitary condition, clear debris and trash at the end of each work day, and shall not damage or disrupt any property unless specifically part of the scope of the Contract Documents. Contractor shall not contract any portion of the Work or otherwise assign the Contract Documents without prior written approval of Owner. (Contractor shall remain responsible for compliance with all terms of the Contract Documents, regardless of the terms of any such assignment.) Contractor shall permit Owner (or its designees) access to the work area, Contractor’s shop, or any other facility, to permit inspection of the Work at all times during construction and/or manufacture and fabrication. The granting of any progress payment, and any inspections, reviews, approvals or oral statements by any Owner representative, or certification by any governmental entity, shall in no way limit or relieve Contractor from its obligations under the Contract Documents. Either party’s waiver of any breach, or the omission or failure of either party, at any time, to enforce any right reserved to it, or to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract Documents, shall not be a waiver of any other right to which any party is entitled, and shall not in any way affect, limit, modify or waive that party’s right thereafter to enforce or compel strict compliance with every provision hereof. Owner shall have, at all times, set-off rights with respect to any payment and Contractor’s failure to perform the terms of the Contract Documents.
Defective Work; Warranties. Contractor warrants that all construction services shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional standards of good and sound construction practices, all Contract Documents requirements, and all laws, codes, standards, licenses, and permits. Contractor warrants that all materials and equipment shall be new, of suitable grade of their respective kinds for their intended uses, and free from defects. Contractor hereby grants to Owner for a period of one year following the date of completion its unconditional warranty of the quality and adequacy of all of the Work including, without limitation, all labor, materials and equipment provided by Contractor and its Subcontractors of all tiers. If either prior to completion of the Work, or within one year after completion, any Work (completed or incomplete) is found to violate any of the foregoing warranties (Defective Work), Contractor shall promptly, without cost to Owner and in accordance with Owner’s written instructions, correct, remove and replace the Defective Work with conforming Work, and correct, remove and replace any damage to other Work or other property resulting therefrom. If Contractor fails to do so within five days of Owner’s written notice (or other time period specified in the notice), Contractor shall pay all of the Owner’s resulting claims, costs, losses and damages. Where Contractor fails to timely correct Defective Work, or defects are discovered outside the correction period, Owner shall have all rights and remedies granted by law.
Earthwork and Underground Facilities. If the Work involves digging trenches or other excavations that extend deeper than four feet below the surface, Contractor shall notify Owner in writing of any material that Contractor believes may be hazardous waste that is required to be removed in accordance law, subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids, or unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract Documents, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7104. For any Work involving trench shoring that costs in excess of $25,000, Contractor shall submit and Owner (or a
6.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 7 registered civil or structural engineer employed by Owner) must accept, in advance of excavation, a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during the excavation of such trench or trenches, pursuant to Labor Code Section 6705. If such plan varies from the shoring system standards, the plan shall be prepared by a registered civil or structural engineer. Consistent with Government Code Section 4215, as between Owner and Contractor, Owner will be responsible for the timely removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunk line utility facilities located on the Site only if such utilities are not identified in the Contract Documents or information made available for bidding.
LEGAL
Compliance with Laws; Conflict of Interests. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations and policies, as amended, including those regarding discrimination, unfair labor practices, anti-kick-back, collusion, prevailing wages, labor compliance, and the provisions of the Americans with Disability Act. Contractor, its officer, partners, associates, agents, and employees, shall not make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use the position afforded them by the Contract Documents to influence any governmental decision in which he or she knows or has reason to know that he or she has a financial interest under applicable state, federal and local conflict of interest regulations. Contractor warrants that no person or agency has been employed or retained, or will be employed or retained, to solicit or obtain any contract with Owner, upon an agreement or understanding for a contingent fee, except a bona fide employee or agency.
Licenses, Patents, Permits. Before commencing Work, Contractor shall apply for, obtain and maintain in current status, at its own expense, any license, permit or approval required from any agency for the performance of Work. To the greatest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall not be entitled to any compensation for any Work performed while not properly licensed, etc.
Employee Wages; Records; Apprentices. This Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor shall post job site notices as prescribed by regulation. Contractor shall pay prevailing wages to its employees on any Order in excess of $1,000.00. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at Owner’s principal office. Contractor shall comply with the 8-hours per day/40 hours per week/overtime/working hours restrictions for all employees, pursuant to the California Labor Code.
Contractor and all subcontractors shall keep and maintain accurate employee payroll records for Work performed. The payroll records shall be certified and submitted as required by law, including Labor Code Section 1771.4 and 1776, including (if the Agreement is awarded on or after April 1, 2015 or continues on or after January 1, 2016) to the Labor Commissioner no less frequently than monthly. Contractor shall comply fully with Labor Code Section 1777.5 in the hiring of apprentices for work relating to the Agreement. If Contract Sum exceeds $2,000 and is funded with federal funds, then Contractor shall pay federal Davis Bacon wages and comply with applicable federal requirements.
Mandatory Contractor and Subcontractor Registration. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771(a), Contractor represents that it and all of its Subcontractors are currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor covenants that any additional or substitute Subcontractors will be similarly registered and qualified.
Indemnity/Liability. Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Owner and each of its officers, directors, representatives, agents and employees, against all claims, suits, actions, loss, cost, damage, expense, and liability arising from or related to bodily injury to or death of any person or damage to any property, or resulting from any breach and/or Contractor’s negligence in performing the Work pursuant to the Contract Documents.
Notwithstanding any provision of the Contract Documents, Owner shall not be liable to Contractor
6.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 8 or anyone claiming under it, in contract or tort, for any special, consequential, indirect or incidental damages arising out of or in connection with the Contract Documents or the Work. Owner’s rights and remedies, whether under the Contract Documents or other applicable law, shall be cumulative and not subject to limitation.
Worker’s Compensation. Pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1860 and 1861, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contractor represents that it is aware of the provisions of Labor Code Section 3700 that require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and Contractor shall comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work.
MISCELLANEOUS
No Modification or Waiver; Severability. The Contract Documents may not be modified, nor may compliance with any of its terms be waived, except by written instrument executed and approved by fully authorized representatives of Owner and Contractor. Contract Documents headings are for convenience only and do not affect the construction of the Contract Documents. Should any part of the Contract Documents be declared invalid, void or unenforceable, all remaining parts, terms and provisions of the Contract Documents shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be invalidated, impaired or affected thereby.
Independent Contractor. Contractor is an independent Contractor and does not act as Owner’s agent in any capacity, whatsoever. Contractor is not entitled to any benefits that Owner provides to Owner employees including, without limitation, insurance, worker’s compensation benefits or payments, pension benefits, health benefits or insurance benefits. Terms within the Contract Documents regarding directives apply to and concern the result of the Contractor’s provision of Work not the means, methods, or scheduling of the Contractor’s Work. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures with respect to its provision of Work under the Contract Documents. Contractor shall pay all payroll taxes imposed by any governmental entity and will pay all other taxes not specifically identified in the Contract Documents as Owner’s responsibility.
Termination; Suspension; Disputes. Owner may direct Contractor to terminate, suspend, delay, interrupt or accelerate Work, in whole or in part, for such periods of time as Owner may determine in its sole discretion. Owner will issue such directives in writing, and may do so, in whole or in part, for its convenience or due to Contractor’s fault. Owner will compensate Contractor for extra costs resulting from such directives only to the extent that Owner issues such directives for its convenience and not due to Contractor’s fault (but Owner shall not compensate Contractor for costs, profit or overhead anticipated to be earned or incurred on Work terminated for Owner’s convenience.) Contractor shall continue its Work throughout the course of any dispute, and Contractor’s failure to continue Work during a dispute shall be a material breach of the Contract Documents. All claims by Contractor against Owner shall be submitted in writing to Owner, and shall be governed by Public Contract Code Sections 20104 – 20104.6, after which time the one year time period in Government Code Section 911.2 shall be, pursuant to Government Code Section 930.2, reduced to 90 days. Should Contractor be terminated for default, and such termination is subsequently determined to be wrongful, such termination will be converted to a termination for convenience as provided herein.
Notices. All notices between the parties hereto shall be in writing and may be served by commercial express/overnight courier service or by depositing the same in the United States mail, postage prepaid and certified receipt requested, and addressed as indicated beneath each party’s signature in the Master Agreement, or as either party may otherwise provide to the other.
6.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 9 Dispute Resolution. All Contractor claims not otherwise subject to Public Contract Code Sections 20104 et seq shall, as a condition precedent to litigation thereon, first be mediated. Mediation shall be confidential, non-binding, pursuant to the construction mediation procedures of JAMS in San Francisco, California, and utilize the services of a mediator mutually acceptable to the parties. If the parties are unable to agree, the mediator will be selected by JAMS from its panel of approved construction industry mediators, having a minimum of 10 years’ experience in the construction industry. The cost of mediation shall be equally shared by all parties to the mediation. The parties shall, prior to the commencement of a mediation pursuant to this Paragraph, upon notice of the other party, exchange relevant, non-privileged project documents in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure Sections 2031.010 et seq. Additionally, the parties may agree mutually to engage in additional discovery prior to mediation. Should the parties proceed with additional discovery, they shall, unless mutually agreed otherwise, comply with Code of Civil Procedure Sections 2019, et. seq. The Mediator will undertake to resolve any discovery disputes relating to the Mediation.
Execution; Venue; Limitations. The Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed in San Mateo County, California. Enforcement of the Contract Documents shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflict of laws rules. Except as expressly provided in the Contract Documents, nothing in the Contract Documents shall operate to confer rights or benefits on persons or entities other than Owner and Contractor. As between the parties to the Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations for any act or failure to act shall commence to run on the date of Owner’s issuance of the final Certificate for Payment, or termination of the Contract Documents, whichever is earlier, except for latent defects, for which the statute of limitation shall begin running upon discovery of the defect and its cause.
6.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 10 Appendix C to Construction Services Agreement
INSURANCE
1. Commercial General Liability Insurance, written on an “occurrence” basis, which shall provide coverage for bodily injury, death and property damage resulting from operations, liability for slander, false arrest and invasion of privacy, blanket contractual liability, broad form endorsement, and completed operations, personal and advertising liability, with limits of not less than [$1,000,000] general aggregate and [$1,000,000] each occurrence, subject to a deductible of not more than [$1,000] payable by Contractor.
2. Business Automobile Liability Insurance with limits not less than [$1,000,000] each occurrence including coverage for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, subject to a deductible of not more than [$1,000] payable by Contractor.
3. Workers’ Compensation Employers’ Liability limits not less than [$1,000,000] each accident, [$1,000,000] per disease and [$1,000,000] aggregate. Contractor’s Workers’ Compensation Insurance policy shall contain a Waiver of Subrogation against the City of Pacifica, its officers, directors, officials, agents, employees and volunteers. In the event Contractor is self-insured, it shall furnish Certificate of Permission to Self-Insure signed by Department of Industrial Relations Administration of SelfInsurance, State of California.
4. [If applicable] Builder’s Risk Insurance including, without limitation, coverage against loss or damage to the Work by fire, lightening, wind, hail, aircraft, riot, vehicle damage, explosion, smoke, falling objects, vandalism, malicious mischief, collapse, and other such hazards as are normally covered by such coverage. Such insurance shall be in amount equal to the replacement cost (without deduction for depreciation and subject to stipulated value in lieu of average clause) of all construction constituting any part of the Work, excluding the cost of excavations, of grading and filling of the land. [Alternatively, if applicable] An Installation Floater including, without limitation, coverage against loss or damage to the Work by fire, lightening, wind, hail, vandalism, malicious mischief, and other such hazards as are normally covered by such coverage. Such insurance shall be in amount equal to the replacement cost (without deduction for depreciation and subject to stipulated value in lieu of average clause) of the Work. [If either Builder’s Risk or an Installation Floater is required, continue] Such insurance may be subject to deductible clauses not to exceed [$10,000] for any one loss. Such insurance will not cover loss or damage to Contractor’s equipment, scaffolding or other materials not to be consumed in the performance of the Work. The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against Owner.
5. Insurance policies in Appendix C shall contain an endorsement containing the following terms:
5.01 City of Pacifica, its officers, directors, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers, shall be named as additional insureds, but only with respect to liability arising out of the activities of the named insured, and there shall be a waiver of subrogation as to each named and additional insured.
5.02 The policies shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the company’s liability.
5.03 Written notice of cancellation, non-renewal or of any material change in the policies shall be mailed to Owner thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date thereof.
5.04 Insurance shall be primary insurance and no other insurance or self-insured retention carried or held by any named or additional insureds other than Contractor shall be called upon to contribute to a loss covered by insurance for the named insured.
6.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 11
6. Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements shall have clearly typed thereon the Project Name, shall clearly describe the coverage and shall contain a provision requiring the mailing of written notices of cancellation described in clause 5.03 above.
7. All policies of insurance shall be placed with insurers acceptable to Owner. The insurance underwriter(s) must be duly licensed to do business in the State of California and (other than for workers’ compensation) must have an A. M. Best Company rating of [A-,VII] or better. Required minimum amounts of insurance may be increased should conditions of Work, in the opinion of Owner, warrant such increase. Contractor shall increase required insurance amounts upon direction by Owner.
6.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 12 Appendix D to Construction Services Agreement
CONSTRUCTION LABOR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
1. THAT WHEREAS, the City of Pacifica, a general law city and municipal corporation of the State of California (Owner) has awarded to Pavement Coatings Co. as Principal a Construction Services Agreement, dated the 27
th day of March, 2023 (Agreement), titled FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project located at the City of Pacifica in the amount of $1,568,829.20 (Contract Sum), which Agreement is by this reference made a part hereof, for the work described as follows:
The project includes asphalt overlay, cape seal, rubberized chip seal, double slurry seal, slurry seal, microsurfacing, base repair, pavement striping and markings and other miscellaneous related work described in the Plans and Specifications entitled: FY 23-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project.
2. AND WHEREAS, Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with the Agreement to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, material suppliers, and other persons as provided by law;
3. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal and ______________________________ as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto Owner in the sum of 100% OF THE CONTRACT SUM ($_________________), for which payment well and truly to be made we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
4. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if Principal, or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns approved by Owner, or its subcontractors shall fail to pay any of the persons named in California Civil Code Section 9100, or amounts due under the State of California Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed under the Agreement, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the State of California Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of Principal and subcontractors pursuant to California Unemployment Insurance Code Section 13020 with respect to such work and labor, that Surety will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees, otherwise the above obligation shall become and be null and void.
5. This bond shall inure to the benefit of any of the persons named in California Civil Code Section 9100, as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. The intent of this bond is to comply with the California Mechanic’s Lien Law.
6. Surety, for value received, hereby expressly agrees that no extension of time, change, modification, alteration, or addition to the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions, and agreements of the Agreement, or to the work to be performed thereunder, shall in any way affect the obligation of this bond; and it does hereby waive notice of any such extension of time, change, modification, alteration, or addition to the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions, and agreements of the Agreement, or to the work to be performed thereunder.
7. Surety’s obligations hereunder are independent of the obligations of any other surety for the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, material suppliers, and other persons in connection with Agreement; and suit may be brought against Surety and such other sureties, jointly and severally, or against any one or more of them, or against less than all of them without impairing Owner’s rights against the other.
6.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 13
8. Correspondence or claims relating to this bond shall be sent to Surety at the address set forth below.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this __________ day of ____________________, 20___.
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY
Company: (Corp. Seal) Company: (Corp. Seal)
Signature Signature
Name Name
Title Title
Street Address Street Address
City, State, Zip Code City, State, Zip Code
END OF DOCUMENT
6.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 14 Appendix E to Construction Services Agreement
CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
1. THAT WHEREAS, City of Pacifica, a general law city and municipal corporation of the State of California (Owner) has awarded to Pavement Coatings Co. as Principal a Construction Services Agreement, dated the 27
th day of March, 2023 (Agreement), titled FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project located at the City of Pacifica in the amount of $1,568,829.20 (Contract Sum), which Agreement is by this reference made a part hereof, for the work described as follows:
The project includes asphalt overlay, cape seal, rubberized chip seal, double slurry seal, slurry seal, microsurfacing, base repair, pavement striping and markings and other miscellaneous related work described in the Plans and Specifications entitled: FY 23-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project.
2. AND WHEREAS, Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with the Agreement, guaranteeing the faithful performance thereof;
3. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal and _________________________ as Surety are held and firmly bound unto Owner in the sum of 100% OF THE CONTRACT SUM to be paid to Owner or its successors and assigns; for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
4. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if Principal, or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns approved by Owner, shall promptly and faithfully perform the covenants, conditions, and agreements of the Agreement during the original term and any extensions thereof as may be granted by Owner, with or without notice to Surety, and during the period of any guarantees or warranties required under the Agreement, and shall also promptly and faithfully perform all the covenants, conditions, and agreements of any alteration of the Agreement made as therein provided, notice of which alterations to Surety being hereby waived, on Principal’s part to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless Owner as stipulated in the Agreement, then this obligation shall become and be null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
5. No extension of time, change, alteration, modification, or addition to the Agreement, or of the work required thereunder, shall release or exonerate Surety on this bond or in any way affect the obligation of this bond; and Surety does hereby waive notice of any such extension of time, change, alteration, modification, or addition.
6. Whenever Principal shall be and declared by Owner in default under the Agreement, Surety shall promptly remedy the default, or shall promptly:
6.01 Undertake through its agents or independent contractors, reasonably acceptable to Owner, to complete the Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions and to pay and perform all obligations of Principal under the Agreement including, without limitation, all obligations with respect to warranties, guarantees, indemnities, and the payment of liquidated damages; or
6.02 Obtain a bid or bids for completing the Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions, and, upon determination by Owner of the lowest responsible bidder, reasonably acceptable to Owner, arrange for a contract between such bidder and Owner and make available as work progresses (even though there should be a default or a succession of defaults under the contract
6.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 15 or contracts of completion arranged under this paragraph) sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion less the balance of the Contract Sum, and to pay and perform all obligations of Principal under the Agreement including, without limitation, all obligations with respect to warranties, guarantees, and the payment of liquidated damages; but, in any event, Surety’s total obligations hereunder shall not exceed the amount set forth in the third paragraph hereof. The term “balance of the Contract Sum,” as used in this paragraph, shall mean the total amount payable by Owner to the Principal under the Agreement and any amendments thereto, less the amount Owner paid to Principal.
7. Surety’s obligations hereunder are independent of the obligations of any other surety for the performance of the Agreement, and suit may be brought against Surety and such other sureties, jointly and severally, or against any one or more of them, or against less than all of them without impairing Owner’s rights against the others. Surety may not use Contractor to complete the Agreement absent Owner’s written consent.
8. No right of action shall accrue on this bond to or for the use of any person or corporation other than Owner or its successors or assigns.
9. Surety may join in any proceedings brought under the Agreement and shall be bound by any judgment.
10. Correspondence or claims relating to this bond shall be sent to Surety at the address set forth below.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this _________ day of ________________, 20___.
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY
Company: (Corp. Seal) Company: (Corp. Seal)
Signature Signature
Name Name
Title Title
Street Address Street Address
City, State, Zip Code City, State, Zip Code
END OF DOCUMENT
6.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 16 Appendix F to Construction Services Agreement
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS
1. Plans
See Plans and Specifications entitled: FY 23-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project.
2. Shop Drawings
Shop drawings will not be required on this project.
3. Dust Control and Cleanup
During the construction period, the dust level shall be kept at a minimum. The premises shall also be kept free from the accumulation of waste material or rubbish. Failure to meet this requirement may result in project shutdown.
The final cleaning shall leave the facilities ready for use with no additional cleanup. Use no cleaning materials which will contaminate the ocean. At the completion of the contract, the Contractor shall remove all remaining litter, debris, materials, temporary structures and equipment from the site.
The premises shall be left in a clean and orderly condition acceptable to the City Engineer.
In the event Contractor leaves the job overnight in an unclean condition, City may take action to provide necessary requirements and will deduct the cost of doing so from subsequent Contractor payments.
4. Public Safety
Contractor shall be responsible during all phases of work to provide for public safety and convenience. It shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to provide adequate provisions to assure the safety of the general public throughout the duration of the project, including periods when no work is being performed. The site shall be thoroughly fenced-off when work is not actively in progress, and lighted barricades shall be placed around any obstructions not encompassed by this fence.
In the event Contractor leaves the job overnight in an unsafe condition, or fails to provide for public safety and convenience, City may take action to provide necessary requirements and will deduct the cost of doing so from subsequent Contractor payments.
All applicable safety regulations shall be complied with to protect the public and the Contractor’s employees. Strict compliance with Cal/OSHA safety requirements in doing the work is required.
5. Prevailing Wage Rates
The Contractor shall post, in a location on the job site, the prevailing wage rate Determination which is applicable to this project.
6. Discrimination
6.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 17 No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of the race, sex, age, color, national origin, creed, sexual orientation or marital status of such persons and every contractor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Section 1735 of the California Labor Code.
7. Employment of Apprentices
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 (Chapter 1411, Statutes of 1967) and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
The Contractor and any subcontractor shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
8. Materials and Supplies
All materials and supplies called for by contractor’s scope and proposal and shall be new unless otherwise specified.
9. Protection
The Contractor shall provide adequate protection for the site and surroundings throughout the work.
All damage done to existing property shall be neatly repaired or replaced at the Contractor’s expense. Work shall be executed in a careful and orderly manner with the least possible disturbance to public and occupants of the area.
The Contractor shall conduct his operations in such a manner as to avoid damage to existing improvements and adjacent property. The Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair or replace any damage occurring from his operations to pursue completion of the contract. The repairs and replacement shall be to the satisfaction of the Engineer and according to City standards and practices. The minimum repair or replacement shall be equal to surrounding existing conditions or better, and the Engineer’s decision as to acceptable repair or replacement shall be final. The burden of proof as to whether there was existing damage by the Contractor shall rest with the Contractor.
The site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. All existing facilities shall be protected and, if they are damaged or destroyed by the Contractor, shall be restored or replaced in kind at his expense, to their original conditions, or better, as approved by the City or other owner thereof. The site shall be secured at the conclusion of each work day.
10. Inspections
Inspectors, employed by the City, shall be authorized to inspect all work done and all materials furnished. Such inspection may extend to all or any part of the work on the project and to the preparation, fabrication or manufacture of the materials to be used. An inspector is not authorized to revoke, alter or waive any requirements of the specifications. He is authorized to call the attention of the Contractor to any failure of the work or materials to conform to the specifications and
6.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 18 contract. He shall have the authority to reject materials or suspend the work until any question at issue can be referred to and decided by the Engineer.
An inspector will in no case act as foreman or perform other duties for the Contractor, nor interfere with the Contractor’s management of the work.
In case the Contractor refuses to suspend operations on verbal order, the inspector giving such verbal order will then issue the order in writing. After placing the order in the hands of the person in charge of the work for the Contractor, the inspector will immediately leave the job. Work done during the absence of the inspector will not be accepted or compensated.
The Contractor shall prosecute work only in the presence of an authorized inspector or authorized representative of the Engineer, and any work done without such inspection shall be at the Contractor’s risk and be subject to rejection.
The Contractor shall furnish the Engineer with every reasonable facility for ascertaining whether or not the work, as performed, is in accordance with the requirements and intent of the specifications and contract. The Contractor shall at all times and for any purpose permit the Engineer and any of his representatives and representatives of the City to have access to the work and the premises used by the Contractor.
11. Defective Materials
Any materials condemned or rejected by the Engineer as not meeting the requirements of these specifications may be branded or otherwise marked by the Engineer and shall, on demand, be at once removed by the Contractor to a satisfactory distance from the work.
If the Contractor does not remove such material within a reasonable time, fixed by written notice, the City may remove and store the materials at the expense of the Contractor. If the Contractor does not pay the expense of such removal and storage within ten days thereafter, the City may, upon ten days’ written notice, sell such materials at auction or at private sale. The City will account for the net proceeds thereof after deducting all the costs and expenses that should have been borne by the Contractor.
No partial payment, inspection, taking possession of, or other act made or done by the Engineer or the City with respect to the work prior to the final completion and acceptance thereof shall relieve Contractor from performing the Work in accordance with this contract, and shall not affect or prejudice the right of the Engineer or the City to reject any defective work or material or to require the Contractor complete fulfillment of all the provisions of the contract.
If the Engineer deems it expedient and not in the best interests of the City to correct work injured or done not in accordance with the contract, the defective work may be accepted subject to an equitable deduction from the contract price which may be made therefor by the City upon certificate from the Engineer.
12. Temporary Suspension of Work and Extension of Time for Performance When conditions at the site of the proposed work are unsatisfactory for the prosecution of a part or all of the work as adjudged by the Contractor and he is forced to suspend such work until reasonable conditions for its prosecution exist, he may request, in writing, that the Engineer authorize such suspension of work. Without the Engineer’s approval, any suspensions violate this specification.
6.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 19 Unsatisfactory conditions may include, but not limited to: inclement weather, excessively high surf and/or tides, strikes, excessive high or low ambient temperature and inability of delivery of materials by suppliers for good reason.
When, in the opinion of the Engineer, suspensions of work are beyond the control of both the Contractor and the City (including, without limitation, adverse weather, conditions, earthquakes, force majeure events), the time of performance as set forth in the Agreement will be extended by the Engineer, in writing, by a period of time equal to that lost due to the delay occasioned by the allowed suspension, all at no additional cost to the City and without waiver of remedies for nonproliferation of the work. Such allowed suspension of work shall not relieve the Contractor of his contractual responsibilities.
13. Laws and Regulations
The Contractor shall comply with all local, regional, State and Federal laws and regulations at all times. In addition, the Contractor shall meet the standards set by the Air Quality Act for Noise and Pollution. If there is any conflict between these specifications and provisions and any laws or regulations, the matter shall be brought to the attention of the Engineer immediately.
14. Sound Control Requirements
The Contractor shall comply with all local sound control and noise level rules, regulations and ordinances which apply to any work performed pursuant to the contract.
Each internal combustion engine, used for any purposes on the job or related to the job, shall be equipped with a muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer. No internal combustion engine shall be operated on the project without said muffler.
15. Air Pollution Control
The Contractor shall comply with all air pollution control rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes which apply to any work performed pursuant to the contract, involving any air pollution control rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes specified in Section 11017 of the Government Code.
16. Water Pollution
General:
Contractor shall take all measures necessary to prevent debris or contamination from entering the ocean. Best Management Practice (BMP) shall be enforced at all times.
Correction of Inadequate Pollution and Erosion Control Measures:
If the measures being taken by the Contractor are inadequate to control water pollution effectively, the City Engineer may direct the Contractor to revise operations. The directions will be in writing and will specify the items of work for which the Contractor’s water pollution control measures are inadequate. No further work shall be performed on those items until the water pollution control measures are made adequate.
Abatement of Other Water Pollution:
6.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 20 The cleanup of water pollution by chemicals, petroleum products, cement or by the escape of any other material that is harmful or potentially harmful, from the work site as a result of the Contractor’s operations, into drainage systems or the ocean shall be the financial responsibility of the Contractor. The means of cleanup and the party or parties to be engaged to perform the cleanup work shall be determined by the Engineer in consultation with appropriate hazardous materials, pollution control, safety, health and wildlife authorities and officials. The Contractor shall immediately carry out cleanup orders issued to him through or by the Engineer and shall make the work site accessible to personnel and equipment from outside pollution control resources called in by the Engineer. The cost of cleanup action called for by the Engineer and performed by outside resources shall be deducted from any monies due or become due the Contractor.
Compensation:
Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the Contract Sum paid for the various items of work and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor.
17. Environmental Protection Requirements
Source Reduction and Recycling
The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) mandates that 25 percent of the waste stream in the City of Pacifica be diverted from landfill by 1995 and that this diversion increase to 50 percent by 2000. AB 939 also required the City of Pacifica to prepare and adopt a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) outlining recommended programs to meet the above noted diversion goals. One of the approved SRRE programs is to require the utilization of recycled construction materials for City projects. All work performed under this contract and all contractors and their associates and/or employees shall utilize recycled materials and recycle construction materials where feasible. Construction/Demolition Recycling Resources Lists are available from the Pacifica Planning Department and the California Integrated Waste Management Board.
Contractor shall reuse or recycle any useful construction materials generated during the project.
Disposal
At the end of each working day, the Contractor shall collect all scrap, debris and waste material and dispose of such materials properly.
Hazardous Material/Waste Management
A. Storage
The Contractor shall label and store all hazardous materials, such as pesticides, paints, thinners, solvents, and fuels; and all hazardous wastes, such as waste oil and antifreeze; in accordance with the City of Pacifica Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance and all applicable State and Federal regulations.
The Contractor shall store all hazardous materials and all hazardous wastes in accordance with secondary containment regulations, and it is recommended that these materials and
6.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 21 wastes be covered, as needed, to avoid potential management of collected rain water as a hazardous waste.
The Contractor shall keep an accurate, up-to-date inventory, including Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs), of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes stored on-site, to assist emergency response personnel in the event of a hazardous materials incident.
B. Disposal
The Contractor shall use secondary containment, such as a drip pan, to catch leaks or spills any time that vehicle or equipment fluids are dispensed, changed or poured.
The Contractor shall keep a stockpile of spill cleanup materials, such as rags or absorbents, readily accessible on site.
The Contractor shall clean up leaks and spills of vehicle or equipment fluids immediately and dispose of the waste and cleanup materials as hazardous waste, as described in the section above.
The Contractor shall not wash any spilled material into streets, gutters, storm drains or creeks and shall not bury spilled hazardous materials.
The Contractor shall report any hazardous materials spill to the City of Pacifica Building Division at (650) 738-7344.
The Contractor shall inspect vehicles and equipment arriving on site for leaking fluids and shall promptly repair leaking vehicles and equipment. Drip pans shall be used to catch leaks until repairs are made.
C. Activity-Specific Requirements
The following requirements shall be met on all projects within the City of Pacifica that include the listed activities.
Concrete, Grout and Mortar Waste Management
Material Management:
The Contractor shall store concrete, grout, and mortar away from drainage areas and ensure that these materials do not enter the storm drain system or the ocean waters.
Concrete Truck/Equipment Wash Out:
The Contractor shall not wash out concrete trucks or equipment into streets or gutters.
The Contractor shall perform washout of concrete trucks or equipment off-site or in a designated area on-site where the water will flow onto dirt or into a temporary pit in a dirt area. The Contractor shall let the water percolate into the soil and
6.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing FY 23-24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. AGREEMENT – Page 22 dispose of the hardened concrete in a trash container. If a suitable dirt area is not available, then the Contractor shall collect the wash water and remove it off-site.
18. Layout of Work
Layout of work shall be done by the Contractor. Contractor shall mark the work area limits and facilities to be removed and replaced. All layout shall be approved by the City.
19. Substitutions
Substitutions in material or methods of construction, when necessary because of material shortages or in order to avoid serious delay may be made only after they are approved by the City Engineer in writing.
20. Traffic Control and Public Access
The Contractor shall be responsible for proper traffic control to assure public safety and convenience. Continuous safe public access shall be maintained to residential structures at all times.
21. Material and Workmanship
All materials and workmanship are to be the best of their respective kinds. The terms “or equal,” “approved,” “selected” and so forth shall mean as approved, etc. by the City Engineer. All materials and equipment used should be in accordance with the manufacturer’s printed directions.
Use adequate numbers of skilled workmen who are thoroughly trained and experienced in necessary crafts and who are completely familiar with the specified requirements and methods needed for proper performance of work specified. Use equipment adequate in terms of size, capacity and numbers to accomplish work in a timely manner.
22. Drug-Free Workplace
The Contractor is required to comply with the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988. The requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Policy are described in City of Pacifica Administrative Policy Number
46. 23. Harassment and Discrimination
The Contractor is required to comply with City of Pacifica Administrative Policy Number 33, Harassment and Discrimination in the Workplace.
24. Payroll Records
Contractor and each Sub-Contractor shall keep an accurate payroll record, showing the name, address, social security number, work week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by him in connection with the public work. All payroll records shall be certified and maintained by the Contractor and be made available to auditors and managers from the City upon request.
6.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment "A" - Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Co. [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing OAK #4850-6023-1119 v1 - 1 -
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
This Master Agreement for Consultant Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 27th day of March, 2023, by and between THE CITY OF PACIFICA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and CSG CONSULTANTS, INC., (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). CITY and CONSULTANT may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY requires On-Call Construction Management and Inspection Services/Horizontal Construction in connection with Various City Projects; and WHEREAS, construction management/inspection services will be provided by CSG Consultants, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to perform such services; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has agreed to provide CITY with such services on the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, for the considerations hereinafter set forth, CONSULTANT and CITY agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
1.1. Scope of Services. CONSULTANT agrees to furnish services pursuant to a Task Order in the form set forth in Exhibit A, Task Order, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Services").
1.2. Compliance with Law. The Services shall be performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders.
1.3. Time is of the Essence. CONSULTANT agrees to diligently prosecute the Services. In the performance of this Agreement, time is of the essence.
1.4. Professional Competence. CONSULTANT represents that it has the professional skills necessary to perform the Services and that it will perform the Services in a skillful and professional manner. CONSULTANT represents that it has all the necessary licenses to perform the Services and shall maintain them throughout the term of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees that the Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which CONSULTANT is engaged, in the same or similar geographical area in which CONSULTANT practices its profession, and will prepare all work products required by this Agreement in accordance with such standards. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT is in responsible charge of the Services. Acceptance by CITY of the Services does not operate as a release of CONSULTANT from professional responsibility for the Services performed.
ATTACHMENT "B"
6.b
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
- 2 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
1.5. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT expressly warrants that it will not represent that it is an employee of CITY. Persons employed or utilized by CONSULTANT in the performance of the Services will not be employees or agents of CITY. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.
1.6. Confidentiality. CONSULTANT agrees to maintain in confidence and not disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation, without CITY's prior written consent, any trade secret or confidential information, knowledge or data relating to the products, process, or operation of CITY. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain in confidence and not to disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation any data, information, technology, or material developed or obtained by CONSULTANT during the performance of the Services. The covenants contained in this Section 1.6 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause.
1.7. Ownership of Material. Any reports and other material prepared by or on behalf of CONSULTANT under this Agreement (collectively, the "Documents") shall be and remain the property of CITY. All Documents not already provided to CITY shall be delivered to CITY on the date of termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Documents may be used by CITY and its agents, employees, representatives, and assigns, in whole or in part, or in modified form, for all purposes CITY may deem appropriate without further employment of or payment of any compensation to CONSULTANT.
1.8. Documentation. CONSULTANT shall keep and maintain full and complete documentation and accounting records, employee time sheets, and correspondence pertaining to the performance of the Services, and CONSULTANT shall make such documents available for review and/or audit by CITY and CITY's representatives at all reasonable times for at least four years after the termination of this Agreement or completion of the Services.
1.9. Testimony. CONSULTANT agrees to testify at CITY's request if litigation is brought against CITY in connection with the Services. Unless the action is brought by CONSULTANT or is based upon CONSULTANT's negligence, CITY will compensate CONSULTANT for the preparation and the testimony at CONSULTANT's standard hourly rates.
ARTICLE 2 - COMPENSATION
2.1. Compensation. Compensation for the Services shall be in accordance with the rate and schedules specified in the Task Order. However, in no event shall the amount the CITY pays to CONSULTANT for work done under a Task Order exceed the total compensation specified in the Task Order (“Cost Ceiling”).
2.2. Invoices. CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices in a form satisfactory to CITY on or before the tenth day of each month for Services provided during the preceding month.
CONSULTANT shall submit time and cost records as necessary to substantiate performance of the Services. Within 35 days after receipt of each such invoice, CITY shall verify the accuracy of the invoice, correct the charges where appropriate and as discussed and mutually agreed with CONSULTANT, and make payment to CONSULTANT in an amount equal to the amount of such invoice, as verified or corrected by CITY. No payment hereunder shall be construed as evidence of acceptance of any of CONSULTANT's work. CITY reserves the right to withhold payment from CONSULTANT on account of Services not performed satisfactorily, delays in
6.b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
- 3 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
CONSULTANT's performance of Services, or other defaults hereunder. CONSULTANT shall not stop or delay performance of the Services under this Agreement on account of payment disputes with CITY.
2.3. Status Reports. Together with each monthly invoice, CONSULTANT shall submit a status report detailing the amount expended on the Services to that date and the remaining amount to be expended before the Cost Ceiling is reached. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY in writing when payments have reached 90 percent of the Cost Ceiling.
2.4. Withholding. In lieu of holding retention, CITY shall withhold CONSULTANT's final payment under a Task Order until the Services provided under that Task Order are complete and CITY has received all Documents. CONSULTANT shall diligently continue and complete performance of the Services if the Services are not complete at the time CONSULTANT has performed services up to the Cost Ceiling.
ARTICLE 3 - TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution of the second signature and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 2024 (the "Term"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be extended for successive one-year term(s) upon mutual, written approval by the City Manager or his/her designee and CONSULTANT. Work authorized by a Task Order shall be performed in accordance with the schedule set forth in the Task Order.
3.2. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by CITY upon written notice to CONSULTANT.
3.3. Final Payment. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to compensation for Services performed up to the time of such termination, it being understood that any payments are full compensation for the Services rendered under this Agreement.
3.4. Other Remedies. Nothing in this Article 3 shall be deemed to limit the respective rights of the parties to terminate this Agreement for cause or otherwise to exercise any rights or pursue any remedies which may accrue to them.
ARTICLE 4 - DESIGNATED CONTACTS
4.1. CITY Contact. CITY designates Roland Yip, PE, its Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer, as its contact who shall be responsible for administering and interpreting the terms and conditions of this Agreement, for matters relating to CONSULTANT's performance under this Agreement, and for liaison and coordination between CITY and CONSULTANT. In the event CITY wishes to make a change in CITY 's representative, CITY will notify CONSULTANT of the change in writing.
4.2. CONSULTANT Contact. CONSULTANT designates Nourdin Khayata, its Vice President as its contact, who shall have immediate responsibility for the performance of the Services and for all matters relating to performance under this Agreement. Any change in CONSULTANT's designated contact shall be subject to written approval by CITY.
6.b
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
- 4 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
ARTICLE 5 - INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
5.1. Indemnification. CONSULTANT shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to claims, liability, loss, damage, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's and expert witness fees, awards, fines, penalties, or judgments, arising out of or relating to the Services (collectively "Claims") that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its Officials, officers, employees and agents (the "CITY Parties"), except to the extent the Claims are attributable to CITY Parties' gross negligence or willful misconduct. CONSULTANT shall defend the CITY Parties as required by California Civil Code Section 2778, and with counsel reasonably acceptable to those parties. CONSULTANT shall have no right to seek reimbursement from the CITY Parties for the costs of defense.
If CONSULTANT is a “design professional,” as defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c), CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold the Indemnitees harmless against Liability only to the extent such Liability arises out of, pertains to, or relates to CONSULTANT’s negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct. In such an event, the cost to defend charged to CONSULTANT shall not exceed CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault.
The obligations contained in this Section 5.1 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause for the full period of time allowed by law and shall not in any way be limited by the insurance requirements of this Agreement.
5.2. Health and Safety. CONSULTANT may perform part of the Services at sites which contain unknown working conditions and contaminated materials. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the health and safety of CONSULTANT's employees during the performance of the Services.
5.3. Insurance. CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS employees, subcontractors, consultants and other agency shall procure, provide and maintain at all times during the performance of this Agreement, and for such additional periods as described herein, the insurance listed below with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a Best's rating of no less than A:VII.
A. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance providing bodily injury liability and property damage, to protect against all liability arising out of the use of any owned, leased, passenger or commercial automobile at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit and $2,000,000 aggregate.
Coverage shall apply to hired and non-owned autos.
B. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial General Liability Insurance, with limits providing a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage for each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and $2,000,000 products/completed operations aggregate. The insurance shall cover all operations including but not limited to the following: (1) premises, operations and mobile equipment liability; (2) completed operations and products liability; (3) contractual liability insuring the obligations assumed by CONSULTANT in this Agreement; (4) broad form property damage liability; (5) personal injury liability endorsement, including death; and (6) automobile bodily injury and property damage insurance, including all owned, hired and non-owned equipment.
6.b
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
- 5 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
C. Professional Liability Insurance. Professional Liability Insurance protecting against liabilities arising out of or in connection with negligent acts, errors, or omissions of CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS employees, subcontractors, consultants and other agency in connection with this Agreement, at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage and $1,000,000 aggregate, on a "claims made basis" with a continuation of coverage extension for liabilities for two years from the date the Services are substantially complete. Such professional liability policies shall include coverage for liability assumed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement.
D. Workers Compensation Insurance. Workers Compensation insurance, occupational disease insurance and employer’s liability insurance shall be required with minimum limits as required by law, covering all workplaces involved in this Agreement.
E. Policy Terms. Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with Certificates of Insurance evidencing that CONSULTANT has obtained or maintains the insurance required by this Section 5.3. The Certificates shall be on forms acceptable to CITY. CONSULTANT shall also furnish CITY with original endorsements with the following documentation:
• Precluding cancellation or reduction in coverage before the expiration of thirty (30) days after CITY shall have received written notification thereof from CONSULTANT by United States mail;
• Providing that CONSULTANT's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, and include a “separation of insureds” or “severability” clause which treats each insured separately, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability (crossliability endorsement); • Excepting CONSULTANT’S professional liability insurance, naming CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds (“Additional Insureds”); and
• Providing that for any claims relating to CONSULTANT's services hereunder, CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents, and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY for itself, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents shall be in excess of CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not be contributory with it. • It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverages requirements and/or limits shall be available to the Additional Insured, including but not limited to any umbrella or excess insurance. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be the greater of: (a) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (b) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured.
F. Material Breach. If CONSULTANT fails to maintain insurance coverage or provided insurance documentation which is required pursuant to this Agreement, it shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement. CITY, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from CONSULTANT resulting from said breach.
Alternatively, CITY may purchase the required insurance coverage, and without further notice to CONSULTANT, may deduct from sums due to CONSULTANT any premium
6.b
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
- 6 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
costs advanced by CITY for such insurance. These remedies shall be in addition to any other remedies available to CITY.
ARTICLE 6 - NOTICES
All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered or sent by facsimile or reputable overnight courier and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of: (1) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice; (2) if delivered by Federal Express or other overnight courier for next business day delivery, the next business day; (3) if sent by facsimile, with the original sent on the same day by overnight courier, the date on which the facsimile is received, provided it is before 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time; or (4) if sent electronically, the date of delivery on the confirmed read receipt. Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this Article 6. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of a change in address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice or communication sent. Unless changed in accordance herewith, the addresses for notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be as follows:
If to CITY: City Manager
540 Crespi Drive
Pacifica, CA 94404
Phone: (650) 738-7409
Facsimile: (650) 359-6038
Email: [email protected]
If to CONSULTANT: Nourdin Khayata
Vice Prestident
550 Pilgrim Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
Phone: (650) 522-2500
Email: [email protected]
ARTICLE 7 - MISCELLANEOUS
7.1. Conflict of Interest Prohibition. CITY and CONSULTANT will comply with the requirements of the CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code adopted pursuant to California Government Code §87300 et seq., the Political Reform Act (California Government Code §81000 et seq.), the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission (Title 2, §18110 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations), California Government Code §1090 et seq., and any other ethics laws applicable to the performance of the Services and/or this Agreement. CONSULTANT may be required to file with the CITY Clerk a completed Form 700 before commencing performance of the Services unless the CITY Clerk determines that completion of a Form 700 is not required, pursuant to CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code. Form 700 forms are available from the CITY Clerk.
CONSULTANT may not perform Services for any other person or entity that, pursuant to any applicable law or regulation, would result in a conflict of interest or would otherwise be prohibited with respect to CONSULTANT’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees to cooperate fully with CITY and to provide any necessary and appropriate information requested by CITY or any authorized representative concerning potential conflicts of interest or prohibitions concerning CONSULTANT’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
6.b
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
- 7 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
CONSULTANT may not employ any CITY official, officer or employee in the performance of the Services, nor may any official, officer or employee of CITY have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code §1090 et seq. CONSULTANT hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY. If CONSULTANT was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY in the previous twelve months, CONSULTANT warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code §1090 et seq., the entire Agreement is void and CONSULTANT will not be entitled to any compensation for CONSULTANT’s performance of the Services, including reimbursement of expenses, and CONSULTANT will be required to reimburse CITY for any sums paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, in addition to the foregoing, penalties for violating Government Code §1090 may include criminal prosecution and disqualification from holding public office in the State of California.
Any violation by CONSULTANT of the requirements of this provision will constitute a material breach of this Agreement, and the CITY reserves all its rights and remedies at law and equity concerning any such violations.
7.2. Subcontracting. CONSULTANT may subcontract portions of the Services upon the prior written approval of CITY. CONSULTANT will be solely responsible for payment of such subcontract Services. No contractual relationship will exist between any such subcontractors of CONSULTANT and CITY. CONSULTANT’s subcontractors agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under the Agreement. CONSULTANT’s subcontractors further agree to include the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, with any subsubcontractor to the extent they apply to the scope of the subsubcontractor’s work. A copy of the CITY indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to CONSULTANT’s subcontractors upon request.
7.3. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may only be modified by an amendment in writing signed by each party.
7.4. No Assignment. The Services are deemed unique and neither party shall assign, transfer, subcontract or otherwise substitute its interest in this Agreement or any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party. As limited by this Section 7.2, this Agreement is to be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
7.5. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is determined to be unconstitutional, invalid or beyond the authority of either party, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement can be interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.
7.6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and, when fully signed, such counterparts shall have the same effect as if signed in one document.
6.b
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
- 8 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
7.7. Choice of Law. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without reference to its choice of laws principles and venue shall be in the appropriate court in San Mateo County, California.
7.8. Waiver. No failure on the part of either Party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder. A waiver by either CITY or CONSULTANT of any breach of this Agreement shall not be binding upon the waiving party unless such waiver is in writing. In the event of a written waiver, such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party's rights with respect to any other further breach.
7.9. Mediation. In the event the parties are unable to resolve a dispute arising under this Agreement through good faith negotiations, the parties agree to submit the matter to mediation with a mutually agreeable mediator. Prior to the mediation, the parties shall exchange any documents reasonably necessary to resolve the matter to be mediated.
7.10. Attorney’s Fees. If any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.
7.11. Interpretation. In the event this Agreement is ever construed in any dispute between the parties, it and each of its provisions shall be construed without regard to the party or parties responsible for its preparation and shall be deemed to have been prepared jointly by the parties. The rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement.
7.12. Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of one of the parties represents that he or she is duly authorized to sign and deliver the Agreement on behalf of such party and that this Agreement is binding on such party in accordance with its terms.
7.13. Third Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with, or cause of action in favor of, a third party against either the CITY or CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT’s Services hereunder are being performed solely for the benefit of CITY. CITY shall be an express third-party beneficiary of all contracts between CONSULTANT and any subcontractors or subconsultants in connection with any services performed in connection with, or in furtherance of, this Agreement.
6.b
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
- 9 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.
CITY OF PACIFICA
By:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
CONSULTANT: CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.,
Date
By:
Nourdin Khayata, Vice President
Date
By: Date
Attest:
By: ___________________________
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
Approved As To Form:
By:
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
6.b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
EXHIBIT A
TASK ORDER
6.b
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
- 2 -
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
TASK ORDER NO. ________
CITY OF PACIFICA
AND
__________________________
SECTION 1 – PURPOSE
The purpose of this Task Order is to authorize and direct _______________ to proceed with the work specified in SECTION 2 below, in accordance with the provisions of the Master Agreement for Consultant Services between the City of Pacifica (“CITY”) and _______________ (“CONSULTANT”) hereto dated ________________ (“MASTER AGREEMENT”)
SECTION 2 – SCOPE OF WORK
The items authorized by this Task Order are presented in Attachment “A” – Scope of Services, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
SECTION 3 – COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT
Compensation shall be as provided in the MASTER AGREEMENT. Compensation for services as set forth in SECTION 2 shall be as set forth in Attachment “B” – Compensation, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. Total compensation for all services provided under this Task Order shall not exceed ____________________ ($____________) (“Cost Ceiling”).
SECTION 4 – TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The services described in SECTION 2 of this Task Order shall be completed by _________________ or as extended in writing by the City Manager.
SECTION 5 – ITEMS AND CONDITIONS
All terms and conditions contained in the MASTER AGREEMENT are incorporated by reference and remain in full force and effect.
Approved this _______ day of _____, _______.
[Signatures on Next Page]
CITY OF PACIFICA
6.b
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
-
3-
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
By:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
Approved As To Form
By:
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
CONSULTANT ______________________________
Date
By:
Date
By: Date
6.b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
-
4-
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
ATTACHMENT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
6.b
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
-
5-
OAK #4850-6023-1119v1
ATTACHMENT “B”
COMPENSATION
6.b
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
TASK ORDER NO. 1
CITY OF PACIFICA AND
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.
SECTION 1 – PURPOSE
The purpose of this Task Order is to authorize and direct CSG Consultants, Inc. to proceed with the work specified in SECTION 2 below, in accordance with the provisions of the Master Agreement for Consultant Services between the City of Pacifica (“CITY”) and CSG Consultants, Inc., (“CONSULTANT”) hereto dated March 27, 2023 (“MASTER AGREEMENT”)
SECTION 2 – SCOPE OF WORK
The items authorized by this Task Order are presented in Attachment “A” – Scope of Services, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
SECTION 3 – COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT
Compensation shall be as provided in the MASTER AGREEMENT. Compensation for services as set forth in SECTION 2 shall be as set forth in Attachment “B” – Compensation, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. Total compensation for all services provided under this Task Order shall not exceed One Hundred Forty-Nine Thousand Three Hundred Sixty and zero /100 ($149,360) (“Cost Ceiling”).
SECTION 4 – TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The services described in SECTION 2 of this Task Order shall be completed within 180 working days or as extended in writing by the City Engineer.
SECTION 5 – ITEMS AND CONDITIONS
All terms and conditions contained in the MASTER AGREEMENT are incorporated by reference and remain in full force and effect.
Approved this 27th day of March 2023.
CITY OF PACIFICA
By: Date: __________________
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
Approved As To Form:
By: Date: __________________
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
CONSULTANT: CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.
By: Date: __________________
Nourdin Khayata, Vice President
6.b
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
ATTACHMENT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
6.b
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
550 Pilgrim Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
phone 650.522.2500
fax 650.522.2599
www.csgengr.com
FOSTER CITY | PLEASANTON | SAN JOSE | SACRAMENTO | NEWMAN | FRESNO | ORANGE March 8, 2023
Raymund Donguines, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
City of Pacifica
170 Santa Maria Avenue
Pacifica, CA 94044
Re: Construction Management Services for FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project Dear Mr. Donguines,
CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) is pleased to present our proposal to provide construction management services for the FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project (project) to the City of Pacifica (City). Our firm brings specialized municipal expertise, proximity to the project, an existing successful working relationship with the City, and knowledgeable and experienced staff.
Scope of Work
CSG understands that the City of Pacifica is seeking construction management services for the FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project. We have reviewed the plans and specifications and understand that the work includes crack sealing, polymer modified type II slurry seal, type III double slurry seal, rubber chip seal, type III micro surfacing spot repairs, 3” base repairs, cold planning, surface reconstruction, AC overlay, thermoplastic striping and marking.
• Construction Management Services – The CM shall be responsible for performing all tasks necessary to provide construction management and inspections services for the project.
Proposed Personnel
For this project, CSG proposes Dave Bishop, PE, as the Construction Manager. He is a licensed Professional Civil Engineer and Principal Engineer for CSG and has over 24 years of experience in program management, geotechnical, civil and municipal engineering, and construction management. He has been providing Resident Engineering services to the City of Pacifica for the last five years on several projects. Mr. Bishop will oversee and manage the construction management team for the entire duration of the project. CSG also proposes Brian LaPaglia to provide construction inspection services.
Mr. LaPaglia has recently served as the inspector for the 2022 West Pavement Rehabilitation Project for the City of South San Francisco (SSF), which involved cold in place recycling, base repairs, crack sealing, and RHMA and HMA mill, and fill along various streets throughout the City. Mr. LaPaglia is currently working on the Hillside Blvd Rd Diet in SSF which includes, ADA ramps, drainage improvements, new signals at Hillside and Lincoln, type II slurry seal, striping and signage.
6.b
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
CSGPROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF PACIFICA
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR FY2023-24PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT 2 Fee Schedule
Based on discussions with the City, we understand the anticipated project duration will be 60 working days, beginning on July 1, 2023. Provided in the table below is CSG’s proposed fee. CSG is also allotting hours for preconstruction, project close out, and geotechnical testing services.
Services
Hourly
Rate
Working
Days
Hours
per Day
Preconstruction
& Closeout
Total
Hours
Fee
Resident
Engineer
$220 60 3 24 204 $44,880
Construction
Inspection
$165 60 8 32 512 $84,480
Testing $20,000
Total Fee $149,360
We look forward to continuing our working relationship with the City of Pacifica. If you have any questions, please contact me at (650) 522-2524 or by email at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Nourdin Khayata
Vice President, Construction Management
6.b
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
David
LICENSES &
CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California | C71287
Caltrans Resident Engineers Academy
ICBO Certified Special Inspector
Reinforced Concrete
NASSCO PACP Certified
CPR Certification
New Concepts for Improving Public Works
Construction Inspection Skills
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
San Jose State University
| San Jose, CA
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
Water and Environment Federation (WEF)
California Water Environment Association
(CWEA)
American Public Works Association (APWA)
Bishop PE
Resident Engineer
Mr. Bishop is a licensed Professional Civil Engineer and Principal Engineer for CSG Consultants, Inc. and has over 30 years of experience in program management, geotechnical, civil & municipal engineering, and construction management. With his experience as an Assistant City Engineer, project manager, CIP Manager, and Resident Engineer, in various cities throughout San Mateo County, he has the extensive experience necessary to successfully design, manage, and achieve compliance with contract plans and specifications.
During the last twenty-two years Mr. Bishop has been managing a variety of projects in San Mateo County. Most recently he has managed several street and infrastructure improvement projects in the Cities of Burlingame, South San Francisco, San Mateo, Foster City, Pacifica, County of San Mateo and the Town of Colma. His experience with capital improvements has allowed him to assist Public Works divisions to identify and remedy several emergency projects and regulatory compliance efforts including sewer overflows, water main breaks, landslides, and storm drain flooding. He is familiar with the area and has managed several projects in conjunction with and adjacent to the City of Pacifica in the past.
R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
FY 2020 & 21 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Project No. ST 2104 | South San Francisco, CA Mr. Bishop served as the construction manager for this pavement rehabilitation project. The project scope included concrete curb and gutters, ADA curb ramps, PCC valley gutters, base repairs, crack sealing, cold milling, remove surfacing and base, utility adjustments, storm drain pipes and manholes, HMA mill and fill, thermoplastic striping and markings, red curb painting, signage and HMA speed humps on 13 streets throughout the City of South San Francisco.
FY 2020-21 & FY 2021-22 Pavement Resurfacing Project | City of Pacifica, CA Mr. Bishop served as the construction manager for this pavement resurfacing project. The scope included approximately 40,000 SF of HMA base repair, crack sealing, polymer modified slurry seal, double slurry seal, chip seal, micro surfacing (cape seal), and pavement marking, signage and striping of local roads in the Fassler and Linda Mar area neighborhoods.
Ray Donguines, Contract value $1.7 Million
2019-2020 Street Rehabilitation Project | City of Pacifica, CA Mr. Bishop served as the construction manager for this pavement rehabilitation project. The scope included replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, ADA ramps, retaining walls, paving, striping and signage along Monterey Rd. The work also included a new bulb out adjacent to Ocean Shore school where new RRFB flashing beacons were installed.
Taylor Safe Routes to School and Green Infrastructure Project | City of Millbrae, CA 2019 Mr. Bishop served as the construction manager for this Safe Routes to School and Green Infrastructure Project in the City of Millbrae. The project also includes the first three bioretention basin installations in the City of Millbrae. Along with the new green infrastructure bioretention basins, project improvements also included paving, new pedestrian crossings curb extensions, upgraded sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, storm drain infrastructure, planting, irrigation, signs, street lights, and conduit. 2019 Pavement Repair Project | City of Millbrae, CA
Mr. Bishop served as the Resident Engineer for this pavement repair project. The scope of work includes the removal and replacement of curb & gutters, sidewalks, curb ramps and driveways, cold planning of asphalt concrete, cold-in-place recycling, placing asphalt concrete, utility adjustment, signage and striping. and associated work, including traffic control, stormwater pollution prevention. The project included pavement rehabilitation, ADA curb ramp upgrades, traffic signal repair, traffic handling plans, and traffic detours.
6.b
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
Brian
EDUCATION
Foothill College
| Los Altos, CA
LaPaglia
Construction Inspector
Mr. LaPaglia brings over 17 years of construction industry experience, with extensive background in pavement rehabilitation, general construction, plumbing, electrical, and structural work.
R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
2022 Hillside Blvd Road Diet Improvements Project – TR1906 | South San Francisco, CA Mr. Lapaglia is currently serving as the construction inspector for this road diet, resurfacing and signal enhancement project. The project scope includes concrete curb and gutters, ADA curb ramps, PCC valley gutters, trench drains, crack sealing, slurry sealing, utility adjustments, storm drain inlet replacement, traffic detector loops, thermoplastic striping and markings on Hillside Blvd in the City of South San Francisco. Contract value $900K 2022 West Pavement Rehabilitation Project -ST2204 | South San Francisco, CA Mr. Lapaglia served as a lead construction inspector for this pavement rehabilitation project.
The project scope included the installation of concrete curb and gutters, 90+ ADA curb ramps, PCC valley gutters, base repairs, crack sealing, cold milling, CIR (Cold in Place Recycling), remove surfacing and base, utility adjustments, storm drain inlet replacement, RHMA and HMA mill and fill, traffic detector loops, thermoplastic striping and markings, red curb painting on various streets to the West of JSB Blvd in the City of South San Francisco. Contract value $9.5 Million
El Camino Real Sewer Main Improvements & Adeline Drive Water Main Improvements | Burlingame, CA
Mr. Lapaglia served as the construction inspector for the sewer and water main improvements in the City of Burlingame. The sewer main improvement work consisted of replacing existing sewer mains along El Camino Real, Broadway, Sherman, Ray Drive and Trousdale.
Approximately 670 linear feet of new 12-inch, 925 linear feet of new 10-inch, and 2,063 linear feet of new 8-inch High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) sewer mains were installed via pipe bursting and open trench methods. The Adeline Drive water main improvements work consisted of replacing and installing a new 6-inch Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) water main along El Camino Real with tie-ins on Adeline Dr and El Camino Real.
Real Estate & Facilities | Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, CA Mr. LaPaglia provided daily support to the headquarter office employees, working closely with facility site managers, building operating engineers, employee service specialists ensuring requests were handled on a timely basis, completing requests within the assigned service level agreement. He was responsible for communicating effectively with customers for assigned work and special requests. He also assisted the EHS with monthly inspections of all campuses, ensuring compliance with state fire codes.
General Construction | US Real Estate Investments, Foster City, CA Mr. LaPaglia oversaw the tenant improvements, including plumbing, flooring, electrical, and finish work for 24-unit buildings.
6.b
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
Arash
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science,
Environmental Engineering
San Diego State University
| San Diego, CA
Associates of Mathematics and
Physics,
Miramar College
| San Diego, CA
Kimia
Construction Inspector
Mr. Kimia provides clients with experience in engineering design, plan review, and construction inspection. This includes a variety of projects including grading, public improvements, and storm water. Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Kimi served as an Engineer in Training for a private consultant in San Diego where he assisted in the design and inspection of projects.
R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
2022 West Pavement Rehabilitation Project -ST2204 | South San Francisco, CA Mr. Kimia served as one of three inspectors for this pavement rehabilitation project. The project scope included concrete curb and gutters, ADA curb ramps, PCC valley gutters, base repairs, crack sealing, cold milling, CIR (Cold in Place Recycling), base repairs, utility adjustments, storm drain inlet replacement, RHMA and HMA mill and fill, traffic detector loops, thermoplastic striping and markings, red curb painting on various streets to the West of JSB Blvd in the City of South San Francisco. Contract value $9.5 Million
2022 Hillside Blvd Road Diet Improvements Project – TR1906 | South San Francisco, CA Mr. Kimia is currently serving as the construction inspector for this road diet, resurfacing and signal enhancement project. The project scope included concrete curb and gutters, ADA curb ramps, PCC valley gutters, trench drains, crack sealing, slurry sealing, utility adjustments, storm drain inlet replacement, traffic detector loops, thermoplastic striping and markings, red curb painting on Hillside Blvd in the City of South San Francisco. Contract value $900K FY 2020 & 21 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Project No. ST 2104 | South San Francisco, CA Mr. Kimia served as the construction inspector for this pavement rehabilitation project. The project scope included concrete curb and gutters, ADA curb ramps, PCC valley gutters, base repairs, crack sealing, cold milling, remove surfacing and base, utility adjustments, storm drain pipes and manholes, HMA mill and fill, thermoplastic striping and markings, red curb painting, signage and HMA speed humps on 13 streets throughout the City of South San Francisco. Contract value $2.5 Million Mission Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements | Town of Colma, CA Mr. Kimia served as the construction inspector for this federally funded roadway and pedestrian improvement project. The improvements included upgrades to the existing sidewalks and driveways, three bioretention basins and one flow through planter were installed. The biggest impact to overcome was maintaining access to the critical businesses along Mission Road. Many of the access points were completed by only removing half of the driveway at a time and others were completed by altering the work hours. Other challenges included pedestrian detours, temporary pathways, custom drainage improvements and working with the cemeteries to minimize traffic and noise impact to funeral precessions and ceremonies during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2019-2020 Street Rehabilitation Project | City of Pacifica, CA Mr. Kimia served as the construction inspector for this pavement rehabilitation project. The scope included replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, ADA ramps, retaining walls, AC paving, striping and signage along Monterey Rd. The work also included a new bulb out adjacent to Ocean Shore school where new RRFB flashing beacons were installed.
Taylor Middle School Safe Routes to School Project | City Of Millbrae, CA Mr. Kimia served as the construction inspector for this Safe Routes to School and Green Infrastructure Project in the City of Millbrae. The project also includes the first three bioretention basin installations in the City of Millbrae. Along with the new green infrastructure bioretention basins, project improvements also included paving, new pedestrian crossings curb extensions, upgraded sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, storm drain infrastructure, planting, irrigation, signs, street lights, and conduit.
6.b
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
ATTACHMENT “B”
COMPENSATION
6.b
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
CSGPROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF PACIFICA
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR FY2023-24PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT 2 Fee Schedule
Based on discussions with the City, we understand the anticipated project duration will be 60 working days, beginning on July 1, 2023. Provided in the table below is CSG’s proposed fee. CSG is also allotting hours for preconstruction, project close out, and geotechnical testing services.
Services
Hourly
Rate
Working
Days
Hours
per Day
Preconstruction
& Closeout
Total
Hours
Fee
Resident
Engineer
$220 60 3 24 204 $44,880
Construction
Inspection
$165 60 8 32 512 $84,480
Testing $20,000
Total Fee $149,360
We look forward to continuing our working relationship with the City of Pacifica. If you have any questions, please contact me at (650) 522-2524 or by email at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Nourdin Khayata
Vice President, Construction Management
6.b
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment "B" – Master Agreement and Task Order No. 1 between City of Pacifica and CSG Consultants, Inc. [Revision 1] (5303 :
280
82 101
1 92
82 380
1 COURT CRAGMONT
DRIVE NORFOLK
INVERNESS DRIVE
HICKEY BOULEVARD
CATALINA AVENUE BEACHVIEW AVENUE CRESTMOOR CIRCLE
FOOTHILL DRIVE
FOREST LAKE DRIVE
HEATHCLIFF DRIVE
HEATHCLIFF DRIVE
MANOR DRIVE
GLASGOW DRIVE GLENCOURT WAY LORRY LANE
BROOKHAVEN COURT
HAMILTON COURT MELROSE COURT
RUTLAND DRIVE
DRIVE CORAL RIDGE
FIRECREST AVENUE
HORIZON WAY
IDLEWILD COURT
HICKEY BOULEVARD FARALLON AVENUE
BEACHVIEW AVENUE
KAVANAUGH WAY LOMOND DRIVE
MONTEREY ROAD
HICKEY BOULEVARD
INVERNESS DRIVE
MINA LANE SKYLINE BOULEVARD
SKYLINE BOULEVARD
MANOR DRIVE LOCKHAVEN DRIVE
MANOR DRIVE MANOR DRIVE
LEWIS LANE OCEANA BOULEVARD OCEANA BOULEVARD
COURT HEATHER CLARIDGE DRIVE
SOUTHMOOR DRIVE
BANCROFT WAY
LANE BANCROFT
FREMONT AVENUE
WATERFORD STREET
HESTER PLACE ROAD BEAUMONT
BANCROFT WAY
NELSON AVENUE HIBBERT COURT NELSON AVENUE NORFOLK DRIVE
JOHNSON AVENUE DEL MAR AVENUE FREMONT AVENUE PERRY AVENUE VISTA MAR AVENUE
JOHNSON AVENUE DEL MAR AVENUE FREMONT AVENUE
PERRY AVENUE VISTA MAR AVENUE
EDGEMAR AVENUE MILLER AVENUE
CRAGMONT COURT AVALON DRIVE ARROYO DRIVE EDGEMAR AVENUE
EDGEMAR AVENUE EDGEMAR AVENUE
MILAGRA DRIVE MILAGRA DRIVE MILAGRA DRIVE
COURT CONCHITA
COURT HACIENDA BRUCE STREET McKINNEY AVENUE McKINNEY AVENUE MILLER AVENUE
BOULEVARD OCEANA
ROAD MONTEREY
MONTEREY ROAD MONTEREY ROAD
INVERNESS DRIVE
HICKEY BOULEVARD
CATALINA AVENUE
BEACHVIEW AVENUE CRESTMOOR CIRCLE
FOOTHILL DRIVE
HEATHCLIFF DRIVE
HEATHCLIFF DRIVE
MANOR DRIVE
GLASGOW DRIVE GLENCOURT WAY
LORRY LANE
MONTEREY ROAD
BROOKHAVEN COURT HAMILTON COURT MELROSE COURT
RUTLAND DRIVE
HORIZON WAY
IDLEWILD COURT
FOREST LAKE DRIVE
MONTEREY ROAD
DRIVE
LOCKHAVEN
EDGEMAR AVENUE
1 BANCROFT WAY
NELSON AVENUE
MANOR DRIVE
AVALON DRIVE
ARROYO DRIVE
MILAGRA DRIVE
EDGEMAR AVENUE McKINNEY AVENUE
BOULEVARD HICKEY
COURT HACIENDA
COURT CONCHITA
STREET BRUCE
JOHNSON AVENUE DEL MAR AVENUE
FREMONT AVENUE PERRY AVENUE
VISTA MAR AVENUE MILLER AVENUE
EDGEMAR AVENUE
COURT CRAGMONT COURT HIBBERT
LEWIS LANE
FREMONT AVENUE
HESTER
PLACE
OCEANA BOULEVARD
NORFOLK DRIVE
SKYLINE BOULEVARD
SKYLINE BOULEVARD
KAVANAUGH WAY
LOMOND DRIVE MINA LANE
CLARIDGE DRIVE
DRIVE SOUTHMOOR
OCEANA BOULEVARD
MANOR DRIVE
AVENUE MILLER
EDGEMAR AVENUE
JOHNSON AVENUE DEL MAR AVENUE
FREMONT AVENUE
PERRY AVENUE AVENUE
VISTA MAR
COURT HEATHER
12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898
1 G1
TITLE SHEET
DATE:
ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS
BIDDING
01/31/2023
CITY OF PACIFICA
2023/24 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT
LOCATION MAP
1"=10,000'
VICINITY MAP
1"=550'
ENGINEER
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Richmond, Ca. 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
Tel. (650) 738-3767 | Fax. (650) 738-3003
CITY OF PACIFICA
OWNER
PROJECT AREA
DRAWING C5
-GLASGOW DRIVE
-GLENCOURT WAY
-HEATHCLIFF DRIVE
-INVERNESS AVENUE
-LORRY LANE
-MANOR DRIVE:
FROM MONTEREY ROAD
TO SKYLINE BOULEVARD
DRAWING C4
-CRAGMONT COURT
-HIBBERT COURT
-LEWIS LANE
-MANOR DRIVE:
FROM CRAGMONT COURT
TO MONTEREY ROAD
-MONTEREY ROAD
-NORFOLK DRIVE
DRAWING C3
-ARROYO DRIVE
-CONCHITA COURT
-EDGEMAR AVENUE:
FROM AVALON AVENUE
TO MILAGRA DRIVE (AT
MILLER AVENUE)
-HACIENDA COURT
-MILAGRA DRIVE
-MILLER AVENUE:
FROM MILAGRA DRIVE TO
AVALON DRIVE
DRAWING C2
-AVALON DRIVE
STREETS FROM AVALON
DRIVE TO MANOR DRIVE:
-DEL MAR AVENUE
-EDGEMAR AVENUE
-FREMONT AVENUE
-JOHNSON AVENUE
-MILLER AVENUE
-PERRY AVENUE
-VISTA MAR AVENUE
DRAWING C1
-MANOR DRIVE:
FROM EDGEMAR AVENUE
TO CRAGMONT COURT
-NELSON AVENUE
STREETS FROM MANOR
DRIVE TO NELSON
AVENUE:
-DEL MAR AVENUE
-FREMONT AVENUE
-JOHNSON AVENUE
-PERRY AVENUE
-VISTA MAR AVENUE
ATTACHMENT "C"
6.c
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project) 12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898
2 G2
NOTES, LEGEND,
ABBREVIATIONS
DATE:
ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS
BIDDING
01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project) 12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898
3 G3
CORE SUMMARY TABLE
DATE:
ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS
BIDDING
01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project)
CRAGMONT COURT DRIVE NORFOLK
MANOR DRIVE
LEWIS LANE
OCEANA BOULEVARD AVENUE FREMONT HESTER PLACE
NELSON AVENUE
HIBBERT COURT
NELSON AVENUE AVENUE JOHNSON DEL MAR AVENUE AVENUE FREMONT PERRY AVENUE AVENUE VISTA MAR AVENUE EDGEMAR MILLER AVENUE
MONTEREY ROAD MONTEREY ROAD
MANOR DRIVE
LEWIS LANE
OCEANA BOULEVARD AVENUE FREMONT HESTER PLACE
NELSON AVENUE
HIBBERT COURT
NELSON AVENUE AVENUE JOHNSON DEL MAR AVENUE AVENUE FREMONT PERRY AVENUE AVENUE VISTA MAR AVENUE EDGEMAR MILLER AVENUECRAGMONT COURT DRIVE NORFOLKMONTEREY ROAD MONTEREY ROAD 12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898 4
C1
VICINITY MAP 1
DATE: ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS BIDDING 01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project)
MANOR DRIVE JOHNSON AVENUE DEL MAR AVENUE FREMONT AVENUE PERRY AVENUE VISTA MAR AVENUE AVENUE EDGEMAR MILLER AVENUE
AVALON DRIVE BOULEVARD OCEANA
MANOR DRIVE JOHNSON AVENUE DEL MAR AVENUE FREMONT AVENUE PERRY AVENUE VISTA MAR AVENUE AVENUE EDGEMAR MILLER AVENUE
AVALON DRIVE EDGEMAR AVENUE BOULEVARD OCEANA
12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898 5
C2
VICINITY MAP 2
DATE: ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS BIDDING 01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project)
OCEANA BOULEVARD
AVALON DRIVE
ARROYO DRIVE EDGEMAR AVENUE
EDGEMAR AVENUE
MILAGRA DRIVE
MILAGRA DRIVE
MILAGRA DRIVE
COURT CONCHITA
COURT
HACIENDA BRUCE STREET McKINNEY AVENUE McKINNEY AVENUE MILLER AVENUE
OCEANA BOULEVARD
AVALON DRIVE
ARROYO DRIVE EDGEMAR AVENUE EDGEMAR AVENUE
EDGEMAR AVENUE
MILAGRA DRIVE
MILAGRA DRIVE
MILAGRA DRIVE
COURT CONCHITA
COURT
HACIENDA BRUCE STREET McKINNEY AVENUE McKINNEY AVENUE MILLER AVENUE 12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898 6
C3
VICINITY MAP 3
DATE: ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS BIDDING 01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project)
COURT CRAGMONT DRIVE NORFOLK HICKEY BOULEVARD FARALLON AVENUE
MONTEREY ROAD
MANOR DRIVE
LEWIS LANE
LANE ROAD BEAUMONT HIBBERT COURT NELSON AVENUE
NORFOLK DRIVE
CRAGMONT COURT ROAD MONTEREY MONTEREY ROAD HICKEY BOULEVARD FARALLON AVENUE MONTEREY ROAD MANOR DRIVE LEWIS LANE
LANE ROAD BEAUMONT HIBBERT COURT NELSON AVENUE
NORFOLK DRIVE
CRAGMONT COURT ROAD MONTEREY MONTEREY ROAD
12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898 7
C4
VICINITY MAP 4
DATE: ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS BIDDING 01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project)
HEATHCLIFF DRIVE HEATHCLIFF DRIVE
MANOR DRIVE
GLASGOW DRIVE
GLENCOURT WAY
LORRY LANE
KAVANAUGH WAY
LOMOND DRIVE INVERNESS DRIVE
MINA
LANE
SKYLINE BOULEVARD
SKYLINE BOULEVARD
MANOR DRIVE
LOCKHAVEN DRIVE
COURT HEATHER
CLARIDGE DRIVE
SOUTHMOOR DRIVE ROAD MONTEREY HEATHCLIFF DRIVE HEATHCLIFF DRIVE
MANOR DRIVE
GLASGOW DRIVE
GLENCOURT WAY
LORRY LANE
KAVANAUGH WAY
LOMOND DRIVE INVERNESS DRIVE
MINA
LANE
SKYLINE BOULEVARD
SKYLINE BOULEVARD
MANOR DRIVE
LOCKHAVEN DRIVE
COURT HEATHER
CLARIDGE DRIVE
SOUTHMOOR DRIVE ROAD MONTEREY
12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898 8
C5
VICINITY MAP 5
DATE: ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS BIDDING 01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project) 12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898
9 D1
CIVIL DETAILS 1
DATE:
ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS
BIDDING
01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project) 12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898
10 D2
CIVIL DETAILS 2
DATE:
ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS
BIDDING
01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project) 12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898
11 D3
CIVIL DETAILS 3
DATE: ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS BIDDING 01/31/2023 ℄
6.c
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project) 12 2023/24 PAVEMENT
RESURFACING PROJECT
151 MILAGRA DRIVE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
501 Canal Blvd., Suite I
Pt. Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 * Fax (510) 215-2898
12 D4
CIVIL DETAILS 4
DATE:
ISSUED FOR FINAL PLANS
BIDDING
01/31/2023
6.c
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project) Street Name From To Field Treatment
MANOR DRIVE LOCKHAVEN RD SKYLINE BLVD MILL & THICK OL W/ BASE REPAIR MONTEREY ROAD HICKEY BLVD 600 FT S/O HICKEY BLVD MILL & THICK OL W/ BASE REPAIR
CONCHITA COURT EDGEMAR AVENUE CUL DE SAC CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
CRAGMONT COURT MANOR DR DEAD END CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
DEL MAR AVENUE AVALON DR NELSON AVENUE CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
FREMONT AVENUE AVALON DR NELSON AVENUE CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
GLASGOW DRIVE GLENCOURT WAY HEATHCLIFF DR CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
GLENCOURT WAY INVERNESS DR SKYLINE BLVD CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
HACIENDA COURT MILLER AVENUE DEAD END CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
HEATHCLIFF DRIVE INVERNESS DR KAVANAUGH WAY CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
HEATHCLIFF DRIVE MANOR DR INVERNESS DR CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
HIBBERT COURT NELSON AVENUE CUL DE SAC CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
INVERNESS DRIVE MANOR DR HEATHCLIFF DR CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
JOHNSON AVENUE AVALON DR NELSON AVENUE CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
LORRY LANE HEATHCLIFF DR CUL DE SAC CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
MANOR DRIVE MONTEREY RD LOCKHAVENUEN RD CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
MILAGRA DRIVE OCEANA BLVD CUL DE SAC CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
MILLER AVENUE MILAGRA DR MANOR DR CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR MONTEREY ROAD 600' S/O HICKEY BLVD MANOR DR CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
NELSON AVENUE WEST END PERRY AVENUE CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR NORFOLK DRIVE 100 FT N/O NELSON AVENUE. LEWIS LANE CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
PERRY AVENUE AVALON DR NELSON AVENUE CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
VISTA MAR AVENUE AVALON DR NELSON AVENUE CAPE SEAL W/ BASE REPAIR
ARROYO DRIVE EDGEMAR AVENUE CUL DE SAC SLURRY SEAL
AVALON DRIVE OCEANA BLVD MILLER AVENUE SLURRY SEAL
EDGEMAR AVENUE MANOR DR MILAGRA DR SLURRY SEAL
LEWIS LANE MANOR DR CUL DE SAC SLURRY SEAL
MANOR DRIVE EDGEMAR DR MONTEREY RD SLURRY SEAL
NELSON AVENUE PERRY AVENUE NORFOLK DR SLURRY SEAL
Street List
FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project
6.c
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment "C" - Project Plans and Street List [Revision 1] (5303 : FY 2023-24 Pavement Resurfacing Project)
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Accept Final Report, List of Opportunities & Timing of the Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Receive and accept the Final Report and List of Opportunities & Timing of the Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study.
STAFF CONTACT:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
(650) 738-7409
[email protected]
Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
(650) 501-6004
[email protected]
INTRODUCTION:
On January 23, 2023, the City Council held a joint Study Session with the Planning Commission to receive a presentation, public input and to discuss and provide direction on the Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study (EOS). The study was prepared by Kosmont Companies to provide an analysis of Economic Opportunities in the City of Pacifica and its 5 business districts:
• Pacific Manor/Fairmont
• Sharp Park/Eureka Square
• Rockaway Beach/Vallemar
• Linda Mar/Sun Valley
• Pedro Point
The EOS also serves as a framework to advance the City’s future work in Economic Development as well as develop the future goals of the City’s Vision 2025 and Beyond Fiscal Sustainability Plan.
ADDITIONS & REVISIONS TO PACIFICA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITES STUDY (EOS) Staff has reviewed the discussion and direction provided by the City Council on the EOS from the January 23, 2023 Study Session. The following additions and revisions have been made to the Final version of the EOS Report (Attachment 1) as a result of that review:
SWOT Analysis - Threats (pg. 21)
• Bullet point 4 - Sea level rise and Coastal erosion impacts new development in Rockaway and near Manor - revised to note that it impacts all 5 business districts in the City.
7 Packet Pg. 156
Pacifica City Council 2
March 27, 2023
Citywide Recommendations (pg. 24)
• Added Opportunity - Survey Pacifica Businesses on space needs for future growth & business retention.
• Added Opportunity - Work with Pacifica Businesses on Improved Signage, Facades, Trees & Landscaping
• Revise Recommendation - Work with CalTrans to add Coast Highway signage announcing Business district.
a) Change to Citywide opportunity (not just Pacific Manor) to benefit other districts. b) Note ongoing discussions between City and CalTrans since 2021 Pedro Point Analysis & Recommendations (pg. 86)
• Added Opportunity - Meet with Pedro Point Businesses and Community to explore visitor-serving commercial recreational opportunities such as outdoor dining, beer gardens, bike, and kayak rentals consistent with the Coastal Act of 1976.
Potential Opportunity Sites Section (starting on pg. 88) • Added text that each Opportunity Site review will include analysis of impact on City services & infrastructure.
Revenue Analysis & Sales Tax Growth (pg. 129)
• Bullet point 3 clarified that the 7% Sales Tax growth number includes the impact of revenues from the County Pool (primarily online sales) and sales trends in the State, County, and in Pacifica
Illustrative Fiscal Impact of New Development (pg. 138) • Note that the revenue estimates are for Year 1 revenues in 2023 dollars. They do not include annual growth due to inflationary impacts (e.g. 2% prop tax, sales tax, VLF, franchise fees)
UPDATED LIST OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES & TIMING LIST
The List of Economic Opportunities and the Opportunities Timing Lists (Attachment 2 and Attachment 3) have been updated to reflect direction provided by the City Council. It also includes a new item to Explore Infrastructure Financing Options recommended by the City Manager. These new and revised items are shown in the updated list in bolded red text. They increased the number of Economic Opportunities from 30 to 34 and revised 2 opportunities as follows:
New Opportunities
• Survey Pacifica businesses for space needs for future growth & retention (Citywide) • Work with Pacifica businesses on improved signage, facades, trees & landscaping (Citywide)
• Explore Infrastructure Financing Options with County - EIFD, CRD, CFD (Citywide) • Meet with Pedro Point Businesses to explore Visitor Serving Opportunities such as outdoor dining, beer gardens, bike, and kayak rentals consistent with the Coastal Act of 1976 (Pedro Point)
Revised Opportunities
• Work with CalTrans to add Coast Highway signage announcing Business District (Citywide rather than Pacific Manor district only)
• Beach Blvd. Opportunity Site - Hotel, Commercial, Blended or Community Uses (Move from Medium Term to Short Term timing)
7 Packet Pg. 157
Pacifica City Council 3
March 27, 2023
NEXT STEPS
Once the City Council has accepted the Final EOS, List of Opportunities and Timing of the EOS, staff will integrate these items into the development of the City’s Economic Development program. Items listed in the Short-Term category in the EOS Timing List will be prioritized for further analysis to be considered for implementation in the next two years. Items in the Medium Term and Long-Term categories will be explored and developed in future years. The final list of EOS Opportunities and Timing will also inform the Council during the Strategic Planning process that is currently underway with a second workshop that is scheduled for April 11, 2023.
RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
The Economic Opportunities Study will advance the Vision 2025 & Beyond City Council Priority Item # 4 - Economic Development Strategies for a long-term and financially sustainable vision for Pacifica, as well as the City Council’s Strategic Plan goal of Fiscal Sustainability.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with the acceptance of the Final Version of EOS, List of Opportunities and EOS Timing List.
Pursuing the Economic Opportunities outlined in the EOS Study document could require additional funding in the current and upcoming fiscal years. Implementing opportunities at the 8 Opportunity Sites outlined in the EOS could generate up to $1.45 - $2.75 Million per year in new future revenues for the City if approved by Council. Other recommendations in the EOS report could also result in additional revenues for the City.
ORIGINATED BY:
City Manager's Office
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February 2023 (PDF) Attachment 2 - List of Economic Opportunities - Updated (PDF) Attachment 3 - Economic Opportunity Timing List - Updated (PDF) 7 Packet Pg. 158
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
FEBRUARY 2023
CITY OF PACIFICA
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
Kosmont Companies
El Segundo, CA
7.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 2
CITY OF PACIFICA
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
Kosmont Companies Staff Pacifica City Council Pacifica Staff & Advisory Ken K. Hira, President
Thomas Jirovsky, Senior Advisor
Robert Valenti, Vice President
Tygarjas Bigstyck, Councilmember / Mayor
Sue Vaterlaus, Councilmember / Mayor Pro Tempore
Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
Mary Bier, Councilmember
Christine Boles, Councilmember
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
Christian Murdock, Planning Director
Lisa Petersen, Director of Public Works
Alyssa Barranti, Management Analyst
Brian Moura, Senior Advisor, RGS
7.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary Page 4 – 26
2. Economic / Land Use Trends 27 – 42
3. Business District Analysis 43 – 85
Pacific Manor / Fairmont 49 – 57
Sharp Park / Eureka Square 58 – 63
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar 64 – 71
Linda Mar / Sun Valley 72 – 80
Pedro Point 81 – 86
4. Opportunity Sites 87 – 105
5. Data Appendix 106 - 174
Demographic / Market / Location Analytics / Revenue Data 106 – 160 Community & Stakeholder Outreach 161 – 173
7.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 4
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study
7.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 5
PACIFICA
REGIONAL
CONTEXT
The City of Pacifica is a coastal
community located just south of San
Francisco / Daly City along the Pacific
Coast. The City is well positioned
along Coast Highway in close
proximity to downtown San
Francisco, Silicon Valley, and the
greater Bay Area.
7.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 6
BACKGROUND
Kosmont Companies (“Kosmont”) is pleased to present this Economic Opportunities Study (EOS) for the five main business districts in the City of Pacifica (“City” or “Pacifica”): Pacific Manor / Fairmont, Sharp Park / Eureka Square, Rockaway Beach / Vallemar, Linda Mar / Sun Valley, and Pedro Point. The EOS report is an important complement to the Vision 2025 & Beyond Plan to address economic sustainability for the City.
Given shifting consumer preferences and land uses, and uncertain economic times and fiscal challenges, it is important that Pacifica identify opportunities within the City’s business districts to spur select new development that can increase General Fund revenues.
The EOS identifies long term commercial opportunities supported by market forces and enhanced by steps the City and community can take. Environmental and other studies will be necessary important next steps to implementation of potential projects at the City-owned Beach Boulevard site, Palmetto Ave. and privately-owned Quarry property, as examples.
7.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 7
APPROACH
Kosmont’s approach to preparing the Economic Opportunities Study included the following tasks:
Review of City Budget and Planning documents, together with a daylong tour of the City and its business and residential districts
Interviews with City staff, Council members, and community stakeholders Assessment of regional economic trends
Assessment of local demographic and market conditions In person and virtual community outreach to gain insights as to needs and challenges and present preliminary findings
Detailed assessment of five major commercial districts Identification of key opportunity sites and recommended land uses
7.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City retained Kosmont to prepare the Economic Opportunities Study to supplement the 2025 & Beyond Plan and assist in the preparation of updated zoning and new land use policies for future Specific Plans.
Today’s consumers are using online websites for purchasing a broad array of goods. Current economic forces require new approaches to land use that explore concepts for public amenities and private attractions that help cities capture trips and thus “sales”. Younger consumers, with increased use of media and digital communication, seek gathering places with restaurants, entertainment venues and experiential retail, rather than simply a collection of traditional store fronts. Another important group is the creative class of professionals. This dynamic workforce is attracted to communities with clustered centers, which provide a sense of vitality, diversity, convenience and a mix of work, entertainment, services, arts and culture.
Kosmont is assisting the City in achieving its economic objective by providing a market analysis and recommendations for each district. The goal is to create a compelling experience for commercial uses and foster a sense of community to which people are drawn.
7.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pacifica is a unique coastal city with a variety of attractions, as well as multiple business districts. The City’s commercial base is heavily weighted with grocery-anchored community centers with a limited number of hotel rooms and restaurants and no regional retail anchors, due to City’s broad geographic spread.
Commercial real estate rents and occupancy have been fairly stable over the past 10 years with little new development activity occurring in the City.
Pacifica experiences a relatively high level of travel along Coast Highway with an estimated 10,700 cars (average daily traffic volume) passing the City southbound (~91% of those trips are from travelers who live outside Pacifica). Capturing a small percentage will significantly improve hotel and retail spending. FogFest (4th weekend in September) is the premier tourist event drawing as many as 60,000 visitors with approximately 80% outside of Pacifica. The 2022 event saw an estimated 20% increase in visits over 2019 according to Placer.ai data.
7.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FY2023 Budget
Property Taxes $ 15,181,300
Property Tax: VLF 5,922,400
Sales Tax
(Bradley Burns 1%) 3,111,200
Cannabis Tax 825,000
Transient Occupancy Tax 2,100,000
Utility Users Tax 1,905,600
Business License Tax 516,600
Other Taxes 1,687,800
Total 31,249,900
Pacifica has historically faced budget deficits, service reductions and inability to fund key projects. The City wants to identify opportunities that can spur economic development and increase revenues.
The majority (67%) of City tax revenue comes from property taxes with only ~10% coming from sales taxes and 7% from hotel transient occupancy taxes (TOT) (much lower than statewide and oceanfront community averages).
While the newly approved Measure Y will add a half-cent local sales tax (estimated to generate ~$2.6 million annually) to help address the City’s structural deficit, the City should still develop strategies to generate additional tax revenues.
7.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 11
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
While property taxes are the major revenue source, the tax revenue has grown at only a 4% compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”)
Over the past decade Pacifica has seen sales tax growth of 7.2% - despite a 13% drop during the first year of pandemic.
It is worth noting that Half Moon Bay and San Mateo County had sharper decline in sales during Covid Growth in internet sales across the State – and resulting County Pool distributions - is responsible for dominant share of tax growth in Pacifica.
Actual onsite sales in Pacifica business has seen little or no growth since 2012 City owns Beach Blvd. site that can be developed under unsubordinated ground lease, yielding inflation protected revenue sources, while retaining ownership.
See chart on following page and Appendix C for more detailed info
7.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 12
SALES TAX BY MAJOR INDUSTRY GROUP
EXCLUDES COUNTY POOL – INTERNET SALES
FY 2022 %
Restaurants And
Hotels
$ 533,753 32%
Food And Drugs 435,707 26%
Fuel And Service
Stations 319,643 19%
General Consumer
Goods 212,915 13%
Autos And
Transportation
71,429 4%
Building And
Construction 70,940 4%
Business And Industry 20,982 1%
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Restaurants And Hotels Food And Drugs Fuel And Service Stations General Consumer Goods Autos And Transportation Building And Construction Business And Industry
Source: Total Point of Sale by Major Industry Group, City of Pacifica, HdL
7.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 13
MARKET OVERVIEW
The Pacifica regional retail market has seen limited new construction in the past 10 years, partially due to stable population. The City has captured ~33% of the regional supply in the local Peninsula Coastline submarket. Rents are relatively affordable, compared to most of the nearby submarkets in the San Francisco metro area. The regional office market has grown less than one percent over the past decade, with Pacifica seeing ~26% of demand in the Peninsula Coastline submarket. Office inventory has contracted over the past few years due to demolition activity and no new projects under construction. Rents are substantially below metro averages, with little rent growth in recent years. The multi-family residential market is generally strong in the area due to supply constraints, experiencing some volatility due to tech industry trends. Many renters left the urban areas of San Francisco during the pandemic, relocating to cheaper / suburban towns in the Bay Area; as San Francisco emerges from the pandemic, occupancy is above pre-pandemic levels.
The hotel market has started to rebound in the region; the City has seen some new developments in recent years, and could be in a good position for future developments due to its scenic coastal location and close proximity to the Bay Area population centers.
Source: CoStar
7.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 14
ILLUSTRATIVE FISCAL IMPACT OF NEW DEVELOPMENT
To evaluate Pacifica economic opportunities and understand their impact on City revenues, the table below provides an illustration of incremental tax revenues potentially generated from various types of development on a typical 1-acre parcel:
10,000 SF
Commercial
Services
10,000 SF
Retail
10,000 SF
Restaurant
50-unit
Multifamily
Housing
Mixed Use
40-units &
5,000 SF
60-room
Upscale Hotel
Property Taxes +
VLF in-lieu $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 $65,000 $55,000 $50,000 Direct Sales & Use
Taxes $25,000 $50,000 $75,000 $25,000
Indirect Sales & Use
Taxes $20,000 $15,000 $35,000
Hotel
TOT $300,000
Annual General
Fund Revenues $35,000 $60,000 $90,000 $85,000 $95,000 $385,000
7.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 15
STAKEHOLDER / COMMUNITY COMMENTS
Kosmont conducted extensive stakeholder and community outreach with dozens of in persons interviews, a virtual town hall, a web-based survey and an in-person community meeting to present preliminary findings. • Linda Mar / Sun Valley commercial area is the busiest district, followed by Sharp Park / Eureka Square • Shopping for essentials (e.g., grocery / hardware) is the main reason residents shop in Pacifica • Less than 20% of City residents frequent Pacifica arts / entertainment and leisure facilities • Beautification of buildings, signage and more landscaping is desired • More outdoor activities/dining options are desired
Key themes as to types of new development residents want to see in Pacifica:
• 85% of residents want to see new dining options
• 70% want to see more gathering places
• 65% want to see more entertainment venues
• 60% want to see more arts/cultural events
• 50% want to see more housing options
7.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 16
SURVEY RESULTS
NEW DEVELOPMENT,
IMPROVEMENTS, AND
AMENITIES
43%
30%
21%
22%
21%
27%
9%
8%
4%
5%
12%
42%
34%
44%
46%
41%
26%
32%
24%
33%
29%
22%
11%
29%
32%
25%
31%
25%
44%
52%
44%
49%
37%
4%
7%
3%
7%
7%
23%
15%
15%
19%
16%
30%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Restaurants and dining options
Leisure and entertainment uses / venues
Shopping and other retailers
Places where people can gather (small / large groups)
Arts / cultural / educational
Housing options
Fitness / health / wellness
Personal services
Office (e.g. medical/professional/other)
Professional services
Hotel / hospitality
What type of new additional businesses / developments would you like to see in the business districts?
Extremely Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important at all 51%
45%
51%
30%
28%
30%
23%
21%
35%
38%
30%
43%
42%
36%
32%
34%
13%
15%
16%
21%
27%
30%
36%
34%
1%
2%
3%
6%
4%
4%
9%
11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Mobility / walkability / bike - ability / transit
Safety
Traffic flow
Public art plazas, and walkways
Signage / wayfinding / lighting
Streetscape / design /built environment
Technological infrastructure
Parking infrastructure
Which improvements/amenities should the City focus on in the business districts?
Extremely Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important at all Respondents tend to value adding
new restaurant / dining options,
leisure / entertainment venues, and
places where people can gather to
the business districts. Adding
housing was important to over 50%
of respondents.
See Appendix D for additional
survey results.
7.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 17
PACIFICA HIGHLIGHTS AND ATTRACTIONS
The City’s cliffs and Pacific Ocean coastline are a scenic setting for hiking, biking, surfing, fishing, and sightseeing. Pacifica is home to a variety of historic and cultural attractions, including Sanchez Adobe, Sam’s Castle,
Pacifica Pier, and Sharp Park Golf Course.
The City is also home to a variety of restaurants,
breweries, and wine bars, bringing local flavor and activity to its business districts.
Potential for walkable communities with restaurants and other attractions within close proximity of each other, serves as an amenity for residents and visitors and
supports vibrant commercial districts.
7.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 18
SWOT ANALYSIS – STRENGTHS
Pacifica has many strengths that the City and business community can promote to increase tourism and other commercial activity in the City:
• Sharp Park Specific Plan
• San Francisco and Half Moon Bay adjacency
• Coast / hiking access
• Sharp Park Golf Course
• Municipal Pier
• Fog Festival
• Sanchez Adobe Historic Museum
• Sam’s Castle
• Sanchez Arts Center
Linda Mar Beach
Sharp Park Golf course
7.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 19
SWOT ANALYSIS – WEAKNESSES
There are several challenges the City can address:
• Coast Highway traffic jams at Sharp Park / Rockaway Beach limits residents from shopping on weekends
• Major infrastructure deficiencies – ranked the Bay Area’s worst roads, sites face infrastructure challenges that may add development costs • Poor commercial signage, lack of freeway signage to identify business districts
• Some residents are over-protective of “small town feel”, conflate “small town feel” with “no new development”
• Trade area population does not support larger retailers that residents desire ( i.e. Trader Joe’s)
• Poor transit service to San Francisco and San Mateo County • Permitting process has been problematic (primarily with contract staff) according to a few business owners
7.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 20
SWOT ANALYSIS – OPPORTUNITIES
From stakeholder and community outreach, Kosmont has identified many opportunities:
• Capture share of 10,000 daily tourists traveling past / through City • More events on Palmetto Ave. (e.g., food trucks) to support businesses • Promote new hotels / upgrade Lighthouse Hotel facility • Utilize Business Matters newsletter to promote digital marketing education / social media training and financial assistance for small businesses • Install EV charging facilities in shopping districts to attract tourists for lunch or dinner • Social events for cannabis customers will bring visitors from large region • Sharp Park Golf Course could be promoted as it is historic and a beautiful resource • Quarry property is the key economic development opportunity to expand Rockaway destination
• Chamber could provide hotels with monthly Pacifica Anchor and Coastside magazines • RHNA requirement for ~1,900 housing units translates into millions of dollars in assessed value and spending
Quarry Site
7.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 21
SWOT ANALYSIS – THREATS
There are many threats to attracting new development to Pacifica in the near term:
• Surplus Land Act (“SLA”) restricts City’s ability to sell or lease land for new commercial and market rate residential development (see discussion in Chapter 4)
• Half Moon Bay continues to capture vast majority of regional tourism
• Coastal Commission permitting uncertainty on land west of Hwy 1 • While sea level rise and coastal erosion have citywide impacts, they significantly impact new development in Rockaway and Manor • Wastewater treatment plant expansion may be needed to support significant new project development
• Macroeconomic environment (inflation, high construction costs, high interest rates) increases the risk of ground-up development Nick’s restaurant beach erosion
7.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 22
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OBSERVATIONS
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
Gateway to City from the north; large concentration of retail and residential; two main shopping centers, largest sales tax generating district; challenges with signage, vacancy, landowner coordination Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Specific Plan - Palmetto Ave. identified as desired location for “downtown” Pacifica, some vacant parcels in area; Upgraded façade at Eureka Square improves shopping center environment
Rockaway
Beach /
Vallemar
Main tourism center, district has largest concentration of hotel rooms and restaurants, but limited parking facilities; multiple landowners; could use an e-bicycle rental facility
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley
Gateway to City from the south; Linda Mar Center is professionally management / institutional ownership; District has largest concentration of retail and residential
Pedro Point Poor access with entrance located off Coast Highway; Vibrant retail center with Grocery Outlet rehab and new fitness center
7.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 23
DISTRICT OPPORTUNITY SITES *
* DETAILED SITE INFO IN CHAPTER 4
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
No undeveloped sites
Shopping center refurbishment needed at Pacific Manor
Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Beach Blvd. site well suited for hotel / commercial development Other vacant parcels on Palmetto Ave. suited for potential blended-use residential over retail development
Rockaway
Beach /
Vallemar
Quarry site is a strong development opportunity site for expansion of important tourism facilities. Sea Bowl parking has potential for higher density blended-use
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley
Linda Mar Center surplus parking can be potential residential / mixed-use development; Park Mall – vacant commercial parcels and library site; SamTrans Park and Ride could be relocated for higher use on site Pedro Point No suitable sites available for commercial development; Shopping center tenants are performing well
7.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 24
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
CITYWIDE STRATEGIES
Improve Economic Health of City Businesses
Utilize Business Matters newsletter to promote digital marketing education / social media training and financial assistance for small businesses
Install EV charging facilities in shopping districts to attract tourists for lunch or dinner Chamber could provide hotels with monthly Pacifica Anchor and Coastside magazines Staff to act as City ambassadors with local property/business owners – How do we get to a “Yes” on permitting issues? Work with Pacifica businesses and Chamber of Commerce to understand and address needs for future growth and business retention as well as signage and façade improvements
Coordinate regional marketing with Half Moon Bay
Promote events in various districts (i.e., Sam’s Castle, Sanchez Adobe, Sanchez Art Center) Create “Downtown” District
Transform Palmetto Ave. in Sharp Park into a downtown district Promote more events on Palmetto Ave. (e.g., food trucks) to encourage tourists and resident visitors to stay longer Social events for cannabis customers will bring visitors from large region Sharp Park Golf Course could be promoted as it is historic and a beautiful resource Consider July 4th fireworks off Pier – coordinate with local businesses to create daylong events along Palmetto Ave. Beach Blvd. opportunity site could be activated with commercial uses E-bicycle rental center would be good draw for visitors
7.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 25
DISTRICT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
Pacific Manor / Fairmont Sharp Park / Eureka Square Rockaway Beach / Vallemar There were no significant development
sites found in the Pacific Manor or
Fairmont neighborhood, but Kosmont
recommends upgrading the signage and
appearance of the Safeway anchored
center.
There are several sites suitable for development
within the Palmetto Ave. corridor to create a
downtown district:
• Beach Blvd 3.5 acre former wastewater
treatment site
• Five Palmetto Ave. parcels – from 0.11 to
0.36 acres each
There are two opportunity sites Kosmont identified:
• The flat 20-acre portion of Quarry site is
recommended to be considered for high-end
hospitality development to expand amenities for
Rockaway as a major tourist location
• The parking lot of the Sea Bowl site may be
considered for medium to high density blendeduse housing/commercial Next Steps:
• City should work with the Manor
shopping center owners to encourage
rehabilitation and/or renovation of
center signage and store front façade
• Work with State to add Coast
Highway signage announcing Pacifica
Business district
Next Steps:
• Discuss benefits of the recently adopted
Specific Plan with property owners
• Recommend that the City work with City
and County of San Francisco to expand
activities and promotion of the historic and
beautiful Sharp Park Golf Course
• City needs go through the State HCD’s
Surplus Land Act to clear Beach Blvd. site
for development opportunities
Next Steps:
• Work with ownership to upgrade Lighthouse
Hotel facility
• Initiate Specific plan process with ownership /
encourage low density visitor serving uses along
with residential uses
7.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 26
DISTRICT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
Linda Mar / Sun Valley Pedro Point
There are four opportunity sites Kosmont identified:
• The surplus parking area behind Safeway is recommended to be considered for high density blended use residential / commercial or replacement site for Park & Ride lot
• The SamTrans park & ride lot is in high value location • The Community Center and parking lot at 540 Crespi are high value properties • Park Mall / Sanchez Library undeveloped parcels are lower priority sites Pedro Point is the smallest district by geographic area and commercial SF. The Pedro Point shopping center is
successful, and no redevelopment opportunities were
identified. Vacant land to the west has Coastal Commission and City restrictions impacting development potential.
Next Steps:
• Open discussions with SamTrans to create commercial development site on the Park & Ride lot across from Linda Mar Shopping Center
• Analyze commercial opportunities for Community Center site across from Linda Mar Beach. How much building area is available for commercial uses? • Discuss residential blended-use development options for surplus parking area behind Safeway with owner of Linda Mar shopping Center (Kimco) Next Steps:
• Kosmont has no specific recommendations relative to
Pedro Point
7.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 27
2. ECONOMIC / LAND USE TRENDS
Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study
7.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 28
ECONOMIC AND LAND USE TRENDS
➢ Retail
• Retail store closures, bankruptcies, and ecommerce has changed economics of retail centers. Many are being reimagined (e.g,
blended use)
• Retail is driven by trip-generators such as
entertainment, experience, and essentials
➢ Office
• Downtown S.F. office building vacancy rising as
remote work becomes new normal; Social
distancing leads to offices resizing/reconfiguring
• Corporations see possible shift to suburban
offices - Integrating office in blended use
environments;
➢ Industrial
• E-commerce growth has exploded
• Retail and industrial are merging, with space
being used for Buy Online Pick Up in Store
(BOPIS), fulfillment, last mile and warehousing
➢ Residential
• Homes are live, play, and work environments
• Strength in suburban markets; Home office is
the new amenity, Apartment developments are
being designed to facilitate work
• New residential sites in shopping centers
➢ Hospitality
• Hospitality sector hurt the most by Covid-19,
but leisure travel is rebounding
7.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 29
Housing is Not a
Loss Leader, it’s a
Growth Driver
Retail is Not Just
Retail Anymore
Telework is
Reconfiguring Office
Industrial /
Distribution is
Critical for Your
Economy
Housing Creation as
Economic Development
Retail Reimagination as
Economic Development
Office Conversions as
Economic Development
Industrial & Fulfillment as
Economic Development
• New housing can generate
significant new tax revenues and
support local jobs
• Housing is not necessarily a net
negative fiscal impact, especially
at current property values
• U.S. retail over-built and needs
“right sizing;” Covid accelerated
trends; today its about essentials,
experience & e-commerce
• Blended/mixed use projects
integrate multiple uses (housing,
retail, open space, creative office,
hotel)
• Telework and work from home
options are reshaping the needs
for office space and business
districts
• Job redistribution tied to housing
• Vacancies can lead to fiscal
impact pressure
• Modern industrial is not “your
father’s industrial” – not
smokestacks
• Retail can’t thrive without
distribution
• Booming demand for
distribution, e-commerce, and
data centers, blending for
fulfillment/delivery, job creators
7.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 30
WORK-FROM-HOME GROWTH
Work-from-home is changing where people choose to live, and increases popularity of “15-minute communities” that offer amenities and quality of life.
Census Bureau estimated that ~44% of workers are in jobs where working from home is currently feasible, with only a quarter of those in feasible telework jobs actually utilizing this capability. Research shows the ability to telework likely varies by educational attainment and income-level; many of the telework occupations are Management / Business / Financial / Professional occupations. Opportunity for Pacifica new residential units. Other research shows that work-from-home represent ~30% of days, significantly above pre-pandemic estimates of 5%. Employers are expecting an average of 2.3 work-from-home days per week, suggesting that hybrid home/office model is likely to be well-utilized post-Covid.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; St. Louis Federal Reserve; Survey of Working Arrangements
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0 0.5
1 1.5
2 2.5
3 3.5
4 4.5
5 Percent Paid Full Days WFH
Employer Plans for Post-Covid WFH Days
Work-from-Home: Current Utilization and
Employer Plans for post-Covid
Employer Plans for Post-COVID WFH Days
Percentage of Days WFH
7.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 31
E-COMMERCE GROWTH
E-commerce sales in the U.S. have increased steadily, jumping by 30% to $800 billion annually by Q2 2020
due to increased utilization during the Covid-19
pandemic. This put additional pressure on local brickand-mortar retailers. Post pandemic retail mall shopping has recovered somewhat.
According to UBS, e-commerce’s share of overall U.S.
retail sales will continue to increase over the next 5
years, resulting in a loss of brick-and-mortar sales,
primarily in clothing, office supply and sporting goods. Consumer online shopping behavior has further
solidified during the Covid-19 pandemic, and is not
likely to revert to old patterns, thanks to free 1-day
delivery services, etc.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; St. Louis Federal Reserve; UBS 0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020
E-Commerce Share of Total Retail Sales
(Percent)
E-Commerce Retail Sales
(Billions of Dollars)
E-Commerce Retail Sales
E-Commerce Sales
E-Commerce: Share of Total Retail Sales
7.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 32
RETAIL TRENDS
Shopping centers across the U.S. are faced with dramatic decline in retail sales as the digital economy converts the lifestyles and social patterns of every generation. Today’s consumers use online websites for purchasing many hard and soft good commodities.
Several hundred regional malls have closed in past 5-10 years. By 2025, experts expect only Class-A malls in high income communities are most likely to survive.
The impacts from e-commerce will have major impacts on large shopping centers in the region, particularly power centers. Pacifica is in relatively good position as community retail centers with the strongest opportunity for future growth are those focused on essentials and experiences. Shopping districts that are centered around experiences, entertainment, and essentials are best poised for economic resiliency and future success.
The future for retail centers in Pacifica lies in fostering experiential, entertainment uses and restaurants.
Blended use projects that bring additional uses to retail sites (such as hospitality, last-mile logistics, and multifamily residential) can bring more customers to the stores and thus be a more sustainable and diversified development that serves the community.
7.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 33
Retail It’s About Innovation
Convenience
It’s About
Experience
It’s About
Blended Use
7.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 34
WHAT DRIVES AN ENGAGING RETAIL EXPERIENCE?
Thoughtful
Design
Programmed
Outdoor Space
Communal
Elements
Unique
Amenities
Unique Food
Offerings
Curated Retail
Tenants
• Feels like an
exciting
destination
• Celebrates local
character
• Fosters a
specific
vibe/feeling
• Feels fresh and
innovative
• Fun and
welcoming
environment to
gather and hang
• Fresh air
elevates dining
and shopping
experience
• Mood lighting
and aesthetics
lifts the
ambiance
• Shared
community
experiences
• Encourage
conversation
and connection
• Examples:
breweries,
distilleries,
coffee / tea
• Unexpected
entertainment
attracts and
retains
customers
• Memorable and
engaging
• Examples –
arcade games,
photo booths,
lawn games, art
installations
• Interesting and
culturally rich
food options
• Reflects local
flavor, authentic,
interesting
fusion
• Exciting to try,
drives additional
visits
• Tenants and
pop-ups create a
reason to come
• Digital brands
with brick-andmortar spaces
• Curated
products that
create a
desirable
shopping
experience
• Local / exclusive
products
7.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 35
Stone Brewing Beer Garden Communal Outdoor Spaces
Rodeo39 Curated Retail & Food
Upscale Design Elements
ENGAGING RETAIL
EXAMPLES
Outdoor Amenities Steelcraft Curated Food
7.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 36
EXPERIENTIAL ENTERTAINMENT RETAIL CONCEPTS
Experiential retail / entertainment concepts have been merging food, drinks, and entertainment into engaging experiences. This includes:
Movie Theater concepts such as Alamo Drafthouse that deliver an improved theater experience with better seating / design and elevated food / beverage. Bowling concepts such as Bowlmor and Lucky Strike, which provide a more upscale experience in a lounge setting
Smaller format sports / activities concepts such as Puttshack, Spin Ping Pong, rock climbing gyms, ax throwing, escape rooms, laser tag, and trampoline parks. Larger format sporting / activities, including Topgolf and SFC sports facilities Personalized retail services, such as clothing and accessories stores that offer in-store services and customization
Interactive exhibits, including art galleries, installations, and other cultural offerings Gaming concepts such as arcade bars, pinball, virtual reality gaming, and e-sports
7.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 37
Village Center / Rodeo 39 is an example of an experiential retail / housing blended use project that serves as an entertaining destination and hub for the community. It also demonstrates how adding residential can generate demand for retail on the site and add value to a project.
The Village Center shopping plaza in Stanton was a blighted 24-acre shopping site that had significant vacancy issues. The site’s retail component was rightsized down to 10-acres of the site, with a “town square” environment anchored by the Rodeo 39 curated public market. A new multifamily housing project was built on the remainder of the site.
Food and entertainment – particularly curated local offerings – was the foundation of the public market, a new 41,000 SF retail and dining space. Rodeo 39 has been a great success, with the local community embracing the eclectic destination.
The project also added a variety of entertaining and experiential offerings that encourage people to spend more time – a wide variety of cultural dining, small stage for live music performances, retro arcade / games, boutique tattoo artists, pop-up shops, and a variety of indoor and outdoor seating and gathering areas.
CASE STUDY
VILLAGE CENTER / RODEO 39
7.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 38
AERIAL PHOTO
VILLAGE CENTER / RODEO 39
Residential
Condos
Rodeo 39
Public Market Planet Fitness
Pad Restaurants
7.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 39
SteelCraft projects are good examples of experiential outdoor food halls built out of repurposed metal shipping containers that can activate a small site with relatively low capital costs. The containers are prepared for tenant improvements by insulating the walls, cutting windows, preserving structural integrity, and adding ventilation. The following projects have become well-loved destinations for both locals and visitors.
SteelCraft Long Beach was created from 10 repurposed shipping containers into an outdoor eatery, reactivating the corner of Long Beach Blvd and Bixby Rd with bright red containers, string lights, landscaping, and community-style seating. Tenants include craft food / deserts, beer / wine, and more. The 15,000 SF development was developed by Howard CDM in 2016.
SteelCraft Bellflower is comprised of 14 shipping containers that house 9 businesses – local craft foods / desserts, coffee shop, microbrewery / tap room, wine vendor, and communal dining areas. The project was developed on a 15,000 SF undeveloped parcel, at an estimated cost of $4.5 million.
SteelCraft Garden Grove is comprised of 22 shipping containers that host a variety of businesses, including local craft food / desserts, coffee, craft brewery / taproom, wine vendor, vintage video arcade, incubator office space, and communal dining areas. The site also includes a stage for live entertainment, shared table seating, and intimate spaces set in organic garden / citrus trees. The project was developed on a 1.9 AC site at an estimated cost of $5 million.
CASE STUDY - STEELCRAFT FOOD COURTS
7.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 40
CASE STUDY
UNIQUE HOTEL CONCEPTS IN NATURAL SETTING
There are several unique hospitality concepts Kosmont researched that may fit well in Pacifica:
• On 20+ acres of environmentally sensitive oceanfront lands in California, a “confidential” development has been proposed that is designed to provide low rise luxury bungalow accommodations together with fine dining and event space with public trails that connect to adjacent waterfront properties • On an Oregon waterfront site, a hospitality concept incorporated airstream trailers together with luxury bungalows and communal dining hall
• On a 2-acre infill parcel in Ojai, an Airstream trailer Village called Caravan Crossing was developed – transforming a blighted industrial property into an urban oasis with Airstream trailers that provide overnight accommodations
• On a +4-acre narrow site on Ventura waterfront-adjacent parcel, a similar concept was developed called Waypoint Ventura charging $175 per night for Airstream trailers in a communal setting
7.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 41
LUXURY HOSPITALITY & RETAIL ON OCEANFRONT BLUFF
7.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 42
SMALL INFILL PARCEL – AIRSTREAM HOSPITALITY
7.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 43
3. BUSINESS DISTRICT ANALYSIS
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
7.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 44
PACIFICA
DISTRICTS
FIVE BUSINESS DISTRICT
AREAS WERE IDENTIFIED
FOR THE OPPORTUNITY
ANALYSIS
Boundaries based on
Pacifica Business District boundaries
Sources:
ESRI BAO Online, City of Pacifica
Pacific Manor / Fairmont
Sharp Park / Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley
Pedro Point
7.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 45
DISTRICT DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach /
Vallemar
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley Pedro Point Citywide
Population 14,600 4,600 3,400 15,000 900 38,500
Households 4,990 1,910 1,270 5,570 350 14,060
Avg HH Size 2.9 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7
Median Age 40.7 43.7 46.5 46.8 47.4 43.9
Education: Bach Degree + 51% 55% 55% 47% 76% 51%
Median Household Income $146,500 $137,300 $160,300 $141,100 $200,000 $146,600 Average Household Income $181,200 $177,400 $220,500 $169,800 $285,400 $182,100 Median Home Value $1,024,600 $1,169,900 $1,211,400 $1,035,200 $1,348,400 $1,076,100 Owner Occupied Housing Units 64% 50% 85% 79% 68% 70%
Median Year Housing Unit Built 1967 1967 1961 1964 1966 1965 Median Year Moved into Unit 2010 2012 2003 2003 2010 2007 Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online
7.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 46
HIGHLIGHTS AND ATTRACTIONS
Pacifica is home to a variety of
historic and cultural attractions,
including:
• Sanchez Adobe, a living history
site occupied since prehistoric
indigenous times.
• Sam’s Castle, a castle built in 1908
with a storied history, filled with
works of art and antiques that is
available for special events.
• Pacifica Pier, attracting fisherman
and sightseers observing
humpback and gray whales.
7.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 47
HIGHLIGHTS AND ATTRACTIONS
Sharp Park Golf Course is a public
golf course that features incredible
views of the Pacific Ocean and
Pacifica’s cliffs. It is owned by the
City and County of San Francisco.
The course was designed by Alister
Mackenzie – a famous golf architect
who has designed courses across the
globe, including the Augusta National
Golf Club in Georgia and Cypress
Point Club in Carmel.
Source: VisitPacifica.com
7.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 48
A Grape in the Fog
Wine Bar, $$, 4.3
Nick's Restaurant
Seafood, $$, 3.7
Breakers
American, $$, 4
Oasis Vietnamese Cuisine
Vietnamese, $$, 3.9
Buona Italia Caffe
Italian, $$, 4.9
Pacifica Brewery
Brewery, $$, 3.9
Dinosaurs
Vietnamese, $$, 4.1
Pacifica Thai Cuisine
Thai, $$, 3.4
El Toro Loco
Mexican, $$, 3.9
Puerto 27 Peruvian Kitchen & Pisco Bar
Peruvian, $$$, 3.6
Gorilla Barbeque
Barbeque, $$, 3.9
Redeye Grill
Mediterranean, $$, 4.6
Grand HotPot
Hot Pot, $$, 4.1
Soul Rice
Chinese, $$, 4.7
High Tide
Creperie, Café, $$, 3.7
Table Wine
Wine, $$, 4.9
Humble Sea Brewing Company
Brewery, $$, 4
Taqueria La Perla
Mexican, $$, 4.1
Kenny's Café
Chinese, $$, 4.1
Taqueria Pacifica
Mexican, $$, 4.2
Kitten and Pinky
Vietnamese, $$, 4.6
Taqueria Pacifica
Mexican, $$, 4.2
La Playa
Mexican, $$, 3.2
The Green Enchilada
Mexican, $$, 3.8
Longboard Margarita Bar
Mexican, $$, 3.9
Top Pot
Hot Pot, $$$, 4.7
Lovey's Tea Shoppe
Tea Room, $$, 4.4
Uoyakutei Japanese Restaurant
Japanese, $$, 3.7
Moonraker Restaurant
Seafood, $$$, 3.8
Viva Italiano
Italian, $$, 3.1
PACIFICA
RESTAURANTS
Pacifica is home to a variety of
restaurants, breweries, and wine bars
– bringing local flavor and activity to
its business districts.
Many of the best walkable cities have
many restaurants within close
proximity of each other, which can
serve as an amenity for residents and
visitors and supports vibrant
commercial districts.
Source: Yelp (ratings out of 5.0), Coastside Magazine
7.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 49
PACIFIC MANOR / FAIRMONT
7.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 50
PACIFIC MANOR / FAIRMONT OVERVIEW
Pacific Manor / Fairmont area have two shopping centers:
Fairmont Shopping Center, a 52k+ SF Safeway anchor center near Hickey Blvd & Skyline Blvd in the northeast portion of the City Pacific Manor is also anchored by Safeway and a variety of small retailers and restaurants at northern entrance to City
Residential neighborhoods include single-family as well as clusters of multifamily properties.
District is home to ~5,000 households and 14,600 people. Area is slightly younger relative to the City median age, and has household incomes close to the City average.
10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this area is the largest sales tax generator of the five districts (~$540k in 2022), but sales have barely increased over 2014 levels, the worst performance of any district.
$0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
$0.6
$0.7
$0.8
Millions
Pacific Manor/Fairmont:
Sales Tax History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar
7.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 51
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS OF SHOPPING CENTERS
Fairmont Shopping Center
Safeway, Rite Aid, Shops & Restaurants
Pacific Manor Shopping Centers
Safeway, Walgreens, Shops & Restaurants
Safeway
Rite Aid
Dollar Tree
24 Hour Fitness
Pacific Manor
Hardware
Safeway
Walgreens
Manor Dr
7.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 52
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Fairmont Shopping Center
FAIRMONT SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Fairmont Shopping Center
experienced ~30,000 weekly
visitors, generally in-line with the
pre-Covid baseline and Pacifica’s
overall post-Covid visit recovery.
• Many visitors are from Pacifica,
Daly City, and San Francisco; 64%
of visitors live within 3 miles of
the center.
• Visits to the center peak between
4 - 5 pm.
• Visits are generally stable across
the week, with slightly higher
levels Friday – Saturday.
Source: Placer.ai
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 1.6 mil
Median Weekly Visits 29,800
Visit Frequency 6.3 visits / year
Median Visit Length 29 min.
Avg. HH Income $119k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 53
FAIRMONT SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Fairmont Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 440,000 28%
Daly City 470,000 30%
San Francisco 230,000 15%
South San Francisco 110,000 7%
San Bruno 90,000 6%
San Mateo 10,000 1%
San Jose 10,000 1%
Half Moon Bay Area 10,000 1%
1 - 3 Miles 980,000 63%
3 – 10 Miles 380,000 24%
10+ Miles 190,000 12%
7.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 54
PACIFIC MANOR SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Pacific Manor Shopping Center
experienced ~16,800 weekly
visitors over the past year –
approx. 40% above the pre-Covid
baseline.
• Most common visitor home
locations are San Francisco,
Pacifica, and Daly City; 43% of
visitors live with 3 miles of the
center.
• Visits to the center peak between
6 - 8 pm, with a secondary peak
between 1 - 3pm.
• Visits are strongest Friday –
Sunday, with ~51% of weekly visits
occurring on those days.
Source: Placer.ai
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Pacific Manor Shopping Center
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 865,900
Median Weekly Visits 16,800
Visit Frequency 3.4 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 36 min.
Avg. HH Income $120k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 55
PACIFIC MANOR SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Pacific Manor Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 320,000 37%
Daly City 100,000 11%
San Francisco 180,000 20%
South San Francisco 50,000 5%
San Bruno 20,000 2%
Half Moon Bay Area 20,000 1%
San Jose 10,000 1%
San Mateo 10,000 2%
1 - 3 Miles 370,000 42%
3 – 10 Miles 300,000 34%
10+ Miles 210,000 24%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 56
PACIFIC MANOR / FAIRMONT FINDINGS
Pacific Manor Center Area
Gateway to City from the north
Challenges with signage, vacancy, coordination of multiple landowners Large concentration of retail and residential development No undeveloped sites – will require redevelopment of existing properties Substantial refurbishment of Pacific Manor Shopping Center needed Fairmont Center Area
Strong grocery-anchored center surrounded by residential neighborhoods, draws visitors from Pacifica as well as other nearby cities
No undeveloped sites – healthy neighborhood shopping center
7.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 57
PACIFIC MANOR / FAIRMONT RECOMMENDATIONS
There were no significant undeveloped sites found in the Pacific Manor or Fairmont neighborhood. Kosmont recommends upgrading the signage and appearance of the Safeway anchored Manor Shopping Center Safeway.
Create Coast Highway and offramp visible signage announcing Pacifica Business District Timing
Meetings with Manor owners and State officials would be a near term priority Next Steps:
City should work with the Manor shopping center owners to encourage rehabilitation and/or renovation of center signage and store front façade
Work with State to add Coast Highway signage before first exit from the north
7.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 58
SHARP PARK / EUREKA SQUARE
7.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 59
SHARP PARK / EUREKA SQUARE OVERVIEW
Sharp Park / Eureka Square district:
Eureka Square, a 93k+ SF neighborhood center anchored by Oceana Market east of Hwy 1
Small strip centers and other freestanding retailers along Palmetto Ave and Francisco Blvd
High concentration of multifamily properties
District is home to ~1,900 households and 4,600 people. Area has a median age close to the Citywide benchmark, and has household incomes that are slightly below the City average. Area has the highest percentage of renter occupied housing units (50%) of the five districts. 10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this district generated ~$250k in sales tax in 2022, with significant growth over the past 10 years (9.8% CAGR), particularly since 2020.
$0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
Millions
Sharp Park/Eureka Square:
Sales Tax History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar
7.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 60
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Palmetto Ave
Retail Shops, Small Offices & Restaurants
Beach Blvd Hotel Site
Oceana Market
Eureka Square Shopping Center
Oceana Market, Shops & Restaurants
7.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 61
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Eureka Shopping Center
EUREKA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Eureka Square Shopping Center
experienced ~9,300 weekly visitors
over the past year – approx. 7%
above the pre-Covid baseline, and
generally overperforming Pacifica’s
overall post-Covid visit recovery.
• Most common visitor home
locations are Pacifica, San Francisco,
Daly City; 45% of visitors live
within 3 miles of the center.
• Visits to the center peak between 3
- 4 pm, with ~80% of visits
between 11am - 8pm.
• Visits are generally stable across
the week, with slightly higher levels
on Saturday.
Source: Placer.ai
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 485,700
Median Weekly Visits 9,300
Visit Frequency 4.0 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 35 min.
Avg. HH Income $129k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 62
EUREKA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Eureka Square Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 220,000 42%
Daly City 50,000 10%
San Francisco 70,000 13%
South San Francisco 20,000 5%
San Bruno 20,000 4%
San Mateo 10,000 2%
San Jose 10,000 1%
Half Moon Bay Area 30,000 6%
1 - 3 Miles 220,000 42%
3 – 10 Miles 170,000 33%
10+ Miles 130,000 25%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 63
SHARP PARK / EUREKA SQUARE FINDINGS
Sharp Park area is home to City Hall, Pacifica Pier, Main library and is adjacent to the Countyowned historic Sharp Park Golf Course Sharp Park is suited as future “downtown” for the City using new Specific Plan guidelines The City-owned Beach Blvd. site is a strong development opportunity site for expansion of tourism facilities and to activate Palmetto Avenue
Eureka Square, located on east side of Coast Highway, has recently undergone major renovation
7.a
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 64
SHARP PARK / EUREKA SQUARE RECOMMENDATIONS
There are several sites suitable for development within the Palmetto Ave. corridor to create a downtown district:
• Beach Blvd 3.5 acre former wastewater treatment site well suited for hotel/commercial and residential development • Five Palmetto Ave. parcels – from 0.11 to 0.36 acres each suited for residential/commercial development Timing
Based on current economic conditions, development will likely be several years away Meeting with property owners and starting Surplus Land Act process is near term priority Next Steps:
• Educate property owners on the benefits of the recently adopted Specific Plan • City work with City & County of San Francisco to expand activities/promotion of historic Sharp Park Golf Course • Publicly-owned land needs go through the State HCD’s Surplus Land Act before private development can occur (i.e., Beach Blvd. site)
7.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 65
ROCKAWAY BEACH / VALLEMAR
7.a
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 66
ROCKAWAY BEACH / VALLEMAR OVERVIEW
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar district is home to multiple hotels and a variety of small restaurants / shops / local offices near Rockaway Beach Ave and Cabrillo Hwy with multiple property owners. Residential neighborhoods are primarily single-family, with some small multifamily properties.
District is home to ~1,300 households and 3,400 people. Area is relatively older and has higher household incomes compared to the City averages, and has the highest percentage of owneroccupied housing units. 10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this district generated ~$230k in sales tax in 2022, with little growth over the past 10 years (0.9% CAGR).
The district is home to 236 hotel rooms, ~75% of the City’s hotel inventory; Citywide TOT generates ~$2.1m for General Fund $0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
2013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Millions
Rockaway Beach/Vallemar:
Sales Tax History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar
7.a
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 67
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Quarry Site
Rockaway
Beach
Fairfield Inn & Suites
Pacifica Lighthouse Hotel
Sea Breeze Motel
Inn at Rockaway
7.a
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 68
ROCKAWAY BEACH PLAZA
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Rockaway Beach Plaza had ~14,200
weekly visitors over the past year – 3%
above the pre-Covid baseline, slightly
over Pacifica’s overall post-Covid visit
recovery.
• Most common visitor home locations are
San Francisco, Pacifica and Daly City;
22% of visitors living with 3 miles of the
center.
• Visits peak between 6 - 8 pm, and are
generally spread throughout the day.
• Visits are highest Saturday/Sunday, with
~43% of weekly visits occurring those
days.
Source: Placer.ai
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Rockaway Beach Plaza
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 740,200
Median Weekly Visits 14,200
Visit Frequency 2.3 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 68 min.
Avg. HH Income $124k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 69
ROCKAWAY BEACH PLAZA
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Rockaway Beach Plaza
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 160,000 23%
Daly City 40,000 5%
San Francisco 70,000 10%
South San Francisco 30,000 4%
San Bruno 20,000 3%
San Mateo 20,000 2%
San Jose 20,000 3%
Half Moon Bay Area 20,000 3%
1 - 3 Miles 160,000 22%
3 – 10 Miles 170,000 24%
10+ Miles 380,000 54%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 70
ROCKAWAY BEACH / VALLEMAR FINDINGS
Rockaway Beach is the main tourism center for the City District has largest concentration of hotel rooms and restaurants With multiple property ownership redevelopment is challenging There are limited parking facilities for such a large concentration of commercial Wednesday Farmer’s Market utilizes much of the parking areas Quarry site is a strong development opportunity site for expansion of tourism facilities
7.a
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 71
ROCKAWAY BEACH / VALLEMAR RECOMMENDATIONS
There are two opportunity sites Kosmont identified:
The flat southeastern 20-acre portion of Quarry site is well suited for residential and for high end hospitality development to expand amenities for Rockaway as a major tourist location Approximately 2-3 acres of the parking lot of the Sea Bowl site may be considered for medium to high density blended-use housing/commercial while retaining bowling and restaurant uses Timing
Based on current economic conditions, new development will be several years away Meeting with property owners could be near term priority Next Steps:
City could work with ownership to upgrade Lighthouse Hotel facility Initiate Specific plan process with ownership / encourage low density visitor serving uses Meet with Sea Bowl ownership to discuss long term plans
7.a
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 72
LINDA MAR / SUN VALLEY
7.a
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 73
LINDA MAR / SUN VALLEY OVERVIEW
Linda Mar / Sun Valley has three primary shopping areas:
Linda Mar Shopping Center, an 89k+ SF community center anchored by Safeway near Linda Mar Blvd and Cabrillo Hwy Park Mall Center, a 48k+ SF neighborhood center
Pacifica Athletic Center, a 22k+ SF neighborhood center Residential is primarily single-family, with some clusters of small multifamily units.
District is home to ~5,570 households (the largest of the five districts). Area is older than City median, with lower
household incomes than Citywide average.
10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this district generated ~$465k in sales tax in 2022 (the second-highest district), with annual growth of ~3.8% since 2013.
$0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Millions
Linda Mar/Sun Valley: Sales Tax
History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar
7.a
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 74
LINDA MAR CENTER & SAMTRANS PARK AND RIDE
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Taco Bell Pacifica Beach
Safeway
Rite Aid
Ross Dress for Less
SamTrans Park and Ride
7.a
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 75
PARK MALL CENTER
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Park Mall Center
Sun Valley
Fine Foods
Library
7.a
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 76
COMMUNITY CENTER
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Community
Center
Skate
Park
Parking
Field
7.a
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 77
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-COVID Baseline
City of Pacifica
Linda Mar Shopping Center
LINDA MAR SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Linda Mar Shopping Center had
~40,500 weekly visitors over the past
year – 5% above the pre-Covid
baseline, slightly over Pacifica’s postCovid visit recovery. • Most common visitor home locations
are San Francisco, Pacifica, and Daly
City; 44% of visitors living with 3 miles
of the center.
• Visits to the center peak between 3 -
5 pm, with ~80% of trips between
11am – 8pm.
• Visits are stable across the week, with
slightly higher levels Saturday –
Sunday.
Source: Placer.ai
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 2.1 mil
Median Weekly Visits 40,500
Visit Frequency
6.5 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 31 min.
Avg. HH Income $130k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 78
LINDA MAR SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Linda Mar Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 1,090,000 48%
Half Moon Bay Area 350,000 16%
San Francisco 190,000 8%
Daly City 110,000 5%
South San Francisco 50,000 2%
San Bruno 30,000 1%
San Jose 30,000 1%
San Mateo 20,000 1%
1 - 3 Miles 990,000 44%
3 – 10 Miles 670,000 30%
10+ Miles 600,000 27%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 79
LINDA MAR / SUN VALLEY FINDINGS
Linda Mar Center is the gateway to City from the South Linda Mar Center has professional management, institutional ownership which is beneficial to new development
The District has City’s largest concentration of retail and residential Linda Mar Center unused parking area in SE corner of center is potential residential or mixed-use development site (See Section 4 for detailed discussion of opportunity sites) Park Mall has small commercial land parcel plus vacant land behind library SamTrans Park and Ride lot is proximate to beach and could be developed for higher use The Pacifica Community Center is oceanfront site - valuable opportunity for public/private partnership for commercial use and upgraded community facilities – Surplus Lands Act requirements will likely apply
7.a
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 80
LINDA MAR / SUN VALLEY RECOMMENDATIONS
There are four opportunity sites Kosmont identified:
The SamTrans Park & Ride lot is high value location suited for commercial development The surplus parking area behind Safeway is recommended to be considered for high density blended use residential / commercial or replacement site for Park & Ride lot across from Linda Mar Center The Community Center and parking lot are high value properties that City could leverage Park Mall / Sanchez Library parcels are lower priority sites Timing
Based on current economic conditions, new development will be several years away Analysis of Community Center site and meeting with property owners could be near term priority Next Steps:
Discussions with SamTrans to consider Public/Private Partnership (“P3”) development on the Park & Ride lot Analyze obstacles and redevelopment opportunities for Community Center site across from Linda Mar Beach. How large building needed for community services? Other locations that can accommodate some of them? Discuss blended-use development options for surplus parking area behind Safeway with Kimco
7.a
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 81
PEDRO POINT
7.a
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 82
PEDRO POINT OVERVIEW
Pedro Point district is the smallest district in the City, characterized by the Pedro Point Shopping Center, a 32k+ SF center anchored by Grocery Outlet with fitness, popular retailers and restaurants.
Residential neighborhood is hillside single-family.
District is home to ~350 households and 900 people. Area has the oldest median age of the five districts, highest level of bachelor degrees, and highest household income levels.
10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this district generated ~$135k in sales tax in 2022 (the lowest district), with annual growth of ~10.4% since 2013 (the highest district). $0.0 $0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
2013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Millions
Pedro Point: Sales Tax
History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar
7.a
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 83
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Pacifica Beach
Linda Mar
Shopping Center
Grocery Outlet
Ace Hardware
7.a
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 84
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Pedro Point Shopping Center
PEDRO POINT SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Pedro Point Shopping Center had
~16,400 weekly visitors over the
past year – approx. 25% above the
pre-Covid baseline, and over
Pacifica’s post-Covid recovery.
• Many visitor home locations in San
Francisco and Daly City
• Visits to the center peak between
1 - 2 pm
• Visits are generally stable thru the
week, slightly higher on Saturday –
Sunday.
Source: Placer.ai
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 871,000
Median Weekly Visits 16,400
Visit Frequency 3.8 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 44 min.
Avg. HH Income $141k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 85
PEDRO POINT SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Pedro Point Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 350,000 40%
San Francisco 110,000 13%
Half Moon Bay Area 100,000 11%
Daly City 30,000 3%
South San Francisco 20,000 2%
San Mateo 10,000 1%
San Jose 10,000 1%
San Mateo 10,000 1%
1 - 3 Miles 290,000 33%
3 – 10 Miles 250,000 28%
10+ Miles 330,000 38%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
7.a
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 86
PEDRO POINT FINDINGS
Poor access with entrance located off Coast Highway
Vibrant retail center with new fitness facility and Grocery Outlet rehab Vacant 5-acre parcel behind shopping center possible residential development site, but subject to complicated permitting processes with Coastal Commission and City jurisdictions Meet with Pedro Point Businesses and Community to explore commercial recreational opportunities
7.a
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 87
4. OPPORTUNITY SITES
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
7.a
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 88
POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY
SITES
Based on Kosmont’s research, district analysis and input gathered during the stakeholder / community outreach
process, Kosmont identified several opportunity sites for potential commercial or blended use development. For City owned sites, long term ground leases are strategic options that can provide additional annual revenue.
1. Beach Blvd site
2. Palmetto Ave sites
3. Quarry site
4. Sea Bowl parking field site
5. Linda Mar Center parking field / site
6. Park Mall and library surplus land site
7. SamTrans Park and Ride site
8. Community Center site
See detailed site information on following pages
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
7.a
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 89
SURPLUS LAND ACT CONSIDERATIONS
(FOR PUBLIC AGENCY OWNED PROPERTIES)
Some of the potential opportunity sites such as the Beach Blvd Hotel site, the SamTrans Park and Ride site, and the Community Center site must comply with State mandates prior to selling / leasing.
The Surplus Land Act (SLA) was passed in response to the housing shortage in California. Public agency owned property cannot be sold or leased until it complies with the SLA, with certain exceptions.
SLA requires an up to 150-day (NOA for 60 days + good faith negotiations for 90 days) RFP process to either select or reject an affordable housing project/proposal. City does not have to sell the property for less than fair market value. If rejected, property can be sold to broader market. After completing the process, any development will be subject to a covenant requiring any residential development with 10 or more units to provide at least 15% of units available to low-income households.
If local agency does not comply with SLA, HCD will impose fine of 30% of final sale price for first violation, 50% of final sale price for second violation. City should engage real estate and legal counsel to navigate SLA process and conduct appropriate property due diligence.
SLA Required Disposition Process
1. Declaration of the property as either “surplus” or “exempt surplus.”
2. If declared “surplus,” disseminate a Notice of Availability (NOA) offering the property to other government agencies and affordable housing developers for a period of 60 days.
3. If the City receives letters of interest from government agencies and/or affordable housing developers, then it must negotiate in good faith with those interested parties for a period of 90 days.
4. After the 90-day good faith negotiation period, the City must notify the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and provide information that documents compliance with the process and request a letter of compliance.
5. HCD has 30 days to respond to City with questions/request for more information and, at the conclusion of the 30-day period, must provide a letter stating that the City has complied with the process or not.
7.a
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 90
BEACH BLVD HOTEL OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address 2212 Beach Blvd
APN(s) 016-204-020
016-294-620
Current AV -
Acreage 3.5 AC
Ownership City of Pacifica
Surrounding Use(s) Low-density multifamily, commercial
Opportunity
Key oceanfront site can be anchor for
new “downtown” district. Hotel and
retail would be ideal on long term
ground lease.
Palmetto Ave
Montecito Ave
Beach Blvd
7.a
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 91
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
As an oceanfront community approximately 10
miles south of San Francisco, there is strong
demand for high value hotels with proper
marketing and attraction to leisure travelers.
However, Pacifica has limited upscale hospitality
facilities, especially compared to Half Moon Bay.
The City has envisioned this site as a
future hotel/commercial/mixed/blended use
site. An RFP was issued in late 2019 but
was withdrawn after the COVID pandemic hit.
Background
The City owns a 3.5 acre former
wastewater treatment ocean front site on
Beach Blvd. in the heart of the Sharp Park
district near the Pacifica Pier. According to
the Sharp Park Specific Plan the height limit
is 55 feet, which makes it well suited for
hotel or residential use over ground floor
commercial.
Next Steps
1. Determine if hotel and complimentary uses are still desired by City.
2. Given recently adopted Surplus Land Act (“SLA”) requirements, before private development can occur, City may consider alternative public uses (possible relocation of Community Center).
3. If private development is desired, then SLA process must be initiated to promote the site to potential affordable housing developers throughout the State per Housing & Community Development.
4. If affordable housing developers are not interested or unable to reach agreement with City, then reissue RFQ/P for private development.
5. Can consider leasing the site to provide long term revenue source.
6. Review of Opportunity Site will include analysis of impact on City services & infrastructure
Economic Benefits
A moderate sized select service hotel development on half of the site could yield approximately +$500,000 in annual tax revenues to City, while a residential development of 50-60 units on remaining half could add approximately +$30 million in assessed value and bring $1 million in new resident spending. This could yield +$150,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
7.a
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 92
PALMETTO AVE SITES
1 2 3 4 5
Address 2022 Palmetto
Ave
2100 Palmetto
Ave
2107 Palmetto
Ave
2205
Palmetto Ave
APN(s) 016-032-310 016-181-410 016-182-370
016-182-390 016-192-320 016-211-210
AV (2021) $75,033 $557,124 $420,469 $404,302 $509,626
Acreage 0.36 0.18 0.13 0.31 0.11
Ownership Thomas E
Bishop
Ahmad
Alshamari
Dymond Coast
LLC Ahmad Alshamari Kevin Hale
Surrounding
Use(s) Main Street commercial / retail, low-density multifamily residential Opportunity Sharp Park Specific Plan guidelines for blend of commercial and residential uses would liven foot traffic and benefit Palmetto Ave. businesses. 1 2
3 4
5 Salada Ave
San Jose Ave
Santa Rosa Ave
Montecito Ave
7.a
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 93
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
The recently adopted Sharp Park Specific
Plan is designed to provide a downtown
district for Pacifica and complete
neighborhood for future residents.
There are several vacant Palmetto Ave.
parcels from 0.11 to 0.36 acres each
totaling approximately 1 acre that are
privately owned and can be developed with
moderate density mixed / blended-use
according to Specific Plan.
Palmetto Ave. is the backbone of the
neighborhood with mix of uses to attract
visitors and allow them to linger. Strong
housing demand makes this is an excellent
opportunity.
Background
Palmetto Ave. is the main street in the Sharp Park neighborhood. Historically this has been a heavily residential area. In addition to the new Specific Plan, the City has recently completed ½ mile of bicycle and pedestrian improvements to increase mobility.
Next Steps
1. Discuss the benefits of the recently adopted Specific Plan with property owners
2. Consider developing public parking lots to accommodate more visitors
3. Review of Opportunity Site will include analysis of impact on City services & infrastructure
Economic Benefits
Blended use development of 30-40 units is possible on these parcels and could add approximately +$30 million in assessed value and bring $1 million in new resident spending yielding up to $100,000 in City tax revenues; in addition, new residents would bring important daytime activity to the street.
7.a
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 94
QUARRY OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address
APN(s)
018-150-110
018-150-120
018-150-150
Current AV $5,379,000
Acreage 39.1 AC (as outlined)
Ownership Preserve @ Pacifica LLC
Surrounding Use(s) Open space, hotel, commercial,
residential
Opportunity
Key site to expand Rockaway visitor
facilities. Could be a boutique hotel
and event center on southern portion
of site together with residential.
7.a
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 95
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
The most significant opportunity site for
the City is located in Rockaway /
Vallemar area. Rockaway is the City’s
hospitality center, but it lacks many
amenities including high quality facilities
and parking.
Southern portion of the flat or Eastern
parcel (approximately 20 acres) of the
Quarry site is well suited for residential
and for high end hospitality development
to expand amenities for Rockaway as a
major tourist location (see case study of
unique hospitality concepts in Section 2
– Land Use Trends). The hillside areas
comprising half of the site would be
preserved for open space.
Background
A former rock quarry, the 39-acre flat portion of site is strategically located between the Rockaway hotels, Pacific Ocean and Coast Highway. Development proposals have had extensive history of community opposition, especially housing development. 1983 Ordinance 391-c.s. was approved and rezoned the site to C3 commercial, with a provision that requires a citywide public vote to approve new housing.
Next Steps
1. Initiate Specific Plan process with ownership and encourage low density highvalue visitor serving uses in conjunction with housing development.
2. Review of Opportunity Site will include analysis of impact on City services & infrastructure
Economic Benefits
Luxury hospitality development of 75-100 “bungalows” on Quarry site could add approximately $50 million in AV and yield $500,000 to $1 million in TOT and sales tax, plus over $50,000 in property taxes to the General Fund. Residential development could add another $50 million in AV and $2 million in increased retail sales potential to local businesses.
7.a
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 96
SEA BOWL PARKING LOT OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address 4625 Coast Hwy
APN(s) 022-150-440
Current AV $1,351,000
Acreage 8.81 AC
Ownership Sea Bowl Pacifica Inc
Surrounding Use(s) Pacifica Brewery, open space,
commercial, residential
Opportunity
With highway visibility additional retail
and multi-family housing can be
accommodated on underutilized
portion of site
7.a
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 97
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
Two popular entertainment venues in
the City, the 32-lane Sea Bowl and
lounge and the 3,700 SF Pacifica Brewing
Company are located on an 8.8-acre site.
Background
The existing buildings occupy
approximately 40,000 square feet for a
floor area ratio (“FAR”) of 0.1. With
such low density, 1/3rd of the parking lot
could be reconfigured for medium to
high density blended use providing up to
100 multifamily units and 5,000 SF of
additional commercial, or alternatively
add 15,000 to 20,000 SF of additional
restaurant / entertainment.
Next Steps
1. City and property owners could examine potential rezoning of the site.
2. Review of Opportunity Site will include analysis of impact on City services & infrastructure
Economic Benefits
A blended use development of 80-100 units would add approximately +$50 million in assessed value and bring $2 million in retail sales from new resident spending. This could yield +$200,000 in annual tax revenue to City, in addition to retaining these important retail / entertainment venues.
7.a
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 98
LINDA MAR UNDERUTILIZED PARKING OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address 1380 Linda Mar Blvd
APN(s)
023-041-190
023-041-200
023-041-270 (partial)
Current AV NA
Acreage 1.9 AC
Ownership Linda Mar SC LP
Surrounding Use(s) Retail / commercial, residential
Opportunity
If overflow parking is not required for
shopping center, could accommodate
~60 units of housing plus 5,000 -
10,000 SF retail
7.a
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 99
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
A priority opportunity site within Linda
Mar / Sun Valley is the surplus ~2-acre
parking area behind the Linda Mar
Center Safeway.
Kosmont recommends it be considered
for high density blended use residential /
commercial uses.
Background
This site provides overflow parking for the shopping center, per City code. It was identified in the most recent Housing Element as a site for new residential development.
Next Steps
1. Discuss blended-use development options for surplus parking area behind Safeway with owner of shopping center (Kimco).
2. City / Kimco to analyze potential for parking variance at Linda Mar Center.
3. Review of Opportunity Site will include analysis of impact on City services & infrastructure
Economic Benefits
A blended use development of 60-80 units would add approximately +$40 million in assessed value and bring $1-2 million in new resident spending. This could yield +$150,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
7.a
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 100
PARK MALL OPPORTUNITY SITES
1 2 3
Address 1055 Terra Nova Blvd 725 Oddstad Blvd Sanchez Library / Park APN(s) 023-593-070 023-593-160 023-593-140
AV (2021) $459,334 $796,566 -
Acreage 0.41 AC 2.14 AC 2.77 AC
Ownership Charles Douglas
O’Connor Cabot Layne Sheley City of Pacifica
Surrounding Use(s) Retail, low-density residential
Opportunity
Parcel 1 potential retail pad bldg. Parcel 2 potential commercial / mixed use development; Parcel 3 potential residential/blended use on undeveloped library park land.
1 2
3 7.a
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 101
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
Park Mall is a 48,000 square foot
community center in the eastern section
of Linda Mar. It is anchored by Sun
Valley Fine Foods.
Kosmont recommends that area be
considered for medium density blended
use residential / commercial uses.
Background
There are some vacant parcels surrounding the center, including the Sanchez Park behind the library that are owned by the City. The Sanchez Library facility is to be retained as part of City’s library master plan.
Next Steps
1. Analyze need for City owned surplus land.
2. Meet with private property owners at Park Mall to discuss development opportunities (both retail and multi-family).
3. Review of Opportunity Site will include analysis of impact on City services & infrastructure
Economic Benefits
Blended use development of 50-60 units could add approximately +$30 million in assessed value and bring $1 million in new resident spending. This could yield +$100,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
7.a
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 102
SAMTRANS PARK & RIDE OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address Cabrillo Hwy & Linda Mar Blvd,
behind gas station
APN(s) -
Current AV -
Acreage ~2 AC
Ownership CalTrans (lease to Sam Trans)
Surrounding Use(s) Gas station, residential, retail center Opportunity
Retail pad is viable or possible
Airstream Trailer Hotel that requires
minimal investment. SamTrans will
need to relocate Park and Ride
7.a
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 103
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
The SamTrans Park & Ride lot is an
approximately 2-acre site in a high value
location across from Linda Mar Center
and Coast Highway.
Potential uses could be a “Steelcraft”
container type food court, retail pads
or “Airstream type” hospitality trailer
park.
Background
This site is owned by CalTrans and leased to SamTrans, the regional transportation provider for Park & Ride lot for commuters to San Francisco area. The site does not appear to be heavily utilized. Given its excellent location, CalTrans may consider a public/private development opportunity.
Next Steps
1. Open discussions with CalTrans to consider doing commercial development under long term ground lease
2. Determine potential new parking sites for commuters (perhaps east side of Linda Mar Center)
3. Review of Opportunity Site will include analysis of impact on City services & infrastructure
Economic Benefits
Commercial development could bring approximately $100,000 to $250,000 per year in retail sales and/or TOT to the City General Fund.
7.a
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 104
COMMUNITY CENTER OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address 540 Crespi Drive
APN(s) 022-162-420
Building Size 18,955 SF
Acreage 5.0 AC
Ownership City of Pac Fin Authority Lessee
Surrounding Use(s) Oceanfont, Commercial, residential
Opportunity
Potential public/private partnership
for commercial leases within the
community center facilities
7.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 105
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
The Community Center and parking lot
at 540 Crespi Drive are valuable ocean
frontage properties estimated at 5 acres
in size. Ideally suited for retail uses as
well as community programs currently in
operation.
Background
This facility is a former AT&T operator
switching station, acquired by the City in
1986 and renovated as a community
center in 1988. The public parking lot
serves center, as well as Linda Mar Beach
visitors. The facility is currently housing
City Hall while the main facility is under
construction in Sharp Park.
Next Steps
1. Assess how much of the building area is needed for community services
2. Can some limited commercial uses be accommodated in the building or parking lot
3. If redevelopment is considered, City must proceed through HCD’s SLA process to promote site to affordable housing developers
4. Can consider leasing portions of the site
5. Review of Opportunity Site will include analysis of impact on City services & infrastructure
Economic Benefits
Limited commercial development could bring up to $100,000 per year in retail sales and property taxes to the City General Fund.
7.a
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 106
5. APPENDIX – DEMOGRAPHIC, ECONOMIC AND MARKET DATA
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
7.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 107
A. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
7.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 108
DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY
Pacifica has a population of ~38,000, with essentially no population growth over the past 20 years Average Household Size is 2.7 persons, and the Median Age is 43.9 years; residents are well educated, with ~51% achieving at least a bachelors degree City Average Household Income is $182,000, approx. ~3% less than San Mateo County and 41% higher than statewide levels
Pacifica sees a Net Outflow of ~15,740 jobs, with workers going to surrounding job centers such as San Francisco, South San Francisco, San Mateo, and Daly City Jobs in the City are primarily in the Accommodation / Food Services, Educational Services, Healthcare / Social Assistance, and Retail Trade sectors
Residents of the City are primarily employed in the Healthcare / Social Assistance, Professional / Scientific / Technical Services, Educational Services, and Accommodation / Food Services, sectors
7.a
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 109
POPULATION & INCOME
CITY, COUNTY, AND STATE
2022 Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
Population 38,458 769,689 39,770,476
Households 14,064 270,845 13,570,050
Average HH Size 2.7 2.8 2.9
Median Age 43.9 41 36.7
% Bachelor's Degree or Higher 50.6% 55.5% 37.8%
Per Capita Income $66,642 $71,302 $44,265
Median HH Income $146,648 $150,965 $88,930
Average HH Income $182,144 $202,452 $129,367
Median Home Value $1,076,093 $1,387,819 $629,224
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 110
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Population Growth, 2000 - 2021
Pacifica San Mateo California
POPULATION GROWTH, 2000 – 2022
PACIFICA, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Source: California Department of Finance, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 111
POPULATION BY AGE
PACIFICA HAS A STRONG BABY BOOMER POPULATION
Generation Population
(2022)
0 - 14 Years Old 6,000
15 – 24 Years Old 4,000
25 – 34 Years Old 4,800
35 - 44 Years Old 5,000
45 - 54 Years Old 5,200
55 – 64 Years Old 6,000
65 – 74 Years Old 4,700
75+ Years Old 2,800
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
0 - 14 Years
Old, 16%
15 – 24 Years
Old, 11%
25 – 34 Years
Old, 12%
35 - 44 Years
Old, 13%
45 - 54 Years
Old, 14%
55 – 64 Years
Old, 16%
65 – 74 Years
Old, 12%
75+ Years
Old, 7%
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 112
POPULATION BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
PACIFICA HAS A WELL EDUCATED POPULATION
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
20% 20%
10%
31%
19%
23%
14%
7%
32%
23%
35%
19%
9%
24%
14%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
HS Grad, GED, or Less Some College, No Degree Associate Degree Bachelor's Degree Graduate / Professional Degree
2022 Population by Educational Attainment
Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
7.a
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 113
POPULATION BY INCOME
PACIFICA HAS A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF HIGH EARNERS
6%
8%
18%
20% 19%
30%
7% 9%
17% 17%
14%
37%
13%
15%
27%
19%
11%
16%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
<$25,000 $25,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $100,000 $100,000 - $150,000 $150,000 - $200,000 >$200,000 2021 Households by Income Level
Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 114
HOUSING & HOUSEHOLD SIZE
CITY HAS A GREATER SHARE OF 2-PERSON HHS & OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7+
Households by Household Size
2010 Census Data
Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
% Renter Occupied Housing Units % Owner Occupied Housing Units Owner & Renter Owned Housing Units
2022 Estimate
Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 115
PACIFICA
DISTRICTS
Black boundary line shows southern Pacifica City limit.
Red district boundary lines are based on Census Tracts / Block Groups approximate Business District boundaries
Sources: ESRI BAO Online, City of Pacifica
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach
/ Vallemar
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley Pedro Point
7.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 116
DISTRICT DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach /
Vallemar
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley Pedro Point Citywide
Population 14,600 4,600 3,400 15,000 900 38,500
Households 4,990 1,910 1,270 5,570 350 14,060
Avg HH Size 2.9 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7
Median Age 40.7 43.7 46.5 46.8 47.4 43.9
Education: Bach Degree + 51% 55% 55% 47% 76% 51%
HHs Below Poverty Level 6% 7% 2% 2% 0% 4%
Median Household Income $146,500 $137,300 $160,300 $141,100 $200,000 $146,600 Average Household Income $181,200 $177,400 $220,500 $169,800 $285,400 $182,100 Median Home Value $1,024,600 $1,169,900 $1,211,400 $1,035,200 $1,348,400 $1,076,100 Owner Occupied Housing Units 64% 50% 85% 79% 68% 70%
Median Year Housing Unit Built 1967 1967 1961 1964 1966 1965 Median Year Moved into Unit 2010 2012 2003 2003 2010 2007 Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 117
Census Tract Neighborhood
Approximation:
Pacific Manor/Fairmont: 6027, 6028,6029
Sharp Park / Eureka Square: 6030
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar: 6031
Linda Mar / Sun Valley: 6033, 6034, 6032 (partial)
Pedro Point: 6032 (partial)
PACIFICA
CENSUS TRACTS
Sources:
ESRI BAO Online
6027
6028
6029
6030
6031
6032
6033
6034
7.a
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 118
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2020 CENSUS – POPULATION & HOUSEHOLD OVERVIEW
Approx.
Neighborhood Site 2020 Total
Population
2020 Total
Households
2020 Average
Household Size
2020 Total
Housing Units
2020 Population Density
(Pop per Square Mile)
Pacifica (City) 38,640 14,180 2.72 14,652 3,070.9
Manor / Edgemar 6027 6,080 1,949 3.11 1,990 8,728.1
Manor / Edgemar 6028 4,639 1,495 3.10 1,535 10,028.1
Manor / Edgemar 6029 3,958 1,596 2.46 1,682 7,531.9
Sharp Park 6030 4,597 1,935 2.36 2,047 3,362.8
Rockaway 6031 3,306 1,252 2.63 1,289 1,176.8
Pedro Point /
Linda Mar 6032 3,966 1,434 2.75 1,492 2,270.7
Linda Mar 6033 6,568 2,434 2.69 2,495 2,128.0
Linda Mar 6034 5,561 2,102 2.65 2,140 1,244.2
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 119
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2020 CENSUS – POPULATION BY AGE
Approx.
Neighborhood Site
Population:
<20 Years
Population:
20-44 Years
Population:
45-64 Years
Population
65+ Years
Population:
<20 Years
Population:
20-44 Years
Population:
45-64 Years
Population
65+ Years
Pacifica
(City) 8,104 12,236 11,179 7,144 21% 32% 29% 18%
Manor / Edgemar 6027 1,349 2,487 1,678 705 22% 40% 27% 11% Manor / Edgemar 6028 1,077 1,557 1,382 892 22% 32% 28% 18% Manor / Edgemar 6029 761 1,418 1,170 555 19% 36% 30% 14% Sharp Park 6030 721 1,805 1,103 698 17% 42% 25% 16%
Rockaway 6031 643 912 1,132 570 20% 28% 35% 18%
Pedro Point /
Linda Mar 6032 882 772 1,326 617 25% 21% 37% 17%
Linda Mar 6033 841 2,007 1,886 1,404 14% 33% 31% 23%
Linda Mar 6034 1,594 1,292 1,502 1,703 26% 21% 25% 28%
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 120
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2016-2020 ACS – INCOME OVERVIEW
Approx. Neighborhood Site 2020 Median
Household Income
2020 Average
Household Income
2020 Households
Below the Poverty Level
(%)
Pacifica (City) $130,466 $147,900 4.15%
Manor / Edgemar 6027 $138,086 $147,238 5.63%
Manor / Edgemar 6028 $139,049 $148,639 5.38%
Manor / Edgemar 6029 $120,500 $131,027 8.29%
Sharp Park 6030 $123,208 $135,744 6.76%
Rockaway 6031 $154,156 $175,774 1.55%
Pedro Point / Linda Mar 6032 $127,806 $157,254 1.37%
Linda Mar 6033 $136,056 $160,585 1.25%
Linda Mar 6034 $111,450 $136,234 2.84%
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 121
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2016-2020 ACS – HOUSING UNIT OVERVIEW
Approx.
Neighborhood
2020 Total
Housing Units
2020 Median Year
Structure Built
(Total Housing
Units)
2020 Housing:
1 Detached Unit in
Structure (%)
2020 Owner
Households
2020 Renter
Households
2020 Total Vacant
HUs
Pacifica (City) 14,246 1965 73.60% 67% 30% 3%
Manor / Edgemar 6027 1,943 1968 67.22% 63% 36% 1%
Manor / Edgemar 6028 1,523 1967 78.92% 75% 25% 0%
Manor / Edgemar 6029 1,664 1963 58.59% 49% 45% 6%
Sharp Park 6030 1,962 1967 46.79% 46% 50% 4%
Rockaway 6031 1,145 1961 86.55% 79% 16% 4%
Pedro Point / Linda
Mar 6032 1,396 1958 87.18% 72% 22% 6%
Linda Mar 6033 2,428 1960 84.43% 79% 20% 1%
Linda Mar 6034 2,199 1969 83.67% 75% 23% 2%
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 122
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2016-2020 ACS – HOUSING TENURE OVERVIEW
Median Year
Householder
Moved in
Households by Year Householder Moved In:
1989/Earlier 1990 - 1999 2000 - 2009 2010 - 2014 2015 or Later Pacifica
(City) 2007 2,979
(23%)
1,935
(15%)
2,780
(22%)
1,484
(12%)
3,583
(28%)
Manor /
Edgemar 6027 2010 308 199 426 121 677
Manor /
Edgemar 6028 2010 351 137 267 286 409
Manor /
Edgemar 6029 2011 198 227 333 83 593
Sharp Park 6030 2012 304 188 301 178 612
Rockaway 6031 2003 245 201 314 104 161
Pedro Point
/ Linda Mar 6032 2004 388 141 343 141 261
Linda Mar 6033 2003 538 529 411 359 365
Linda Mar 6034 2003 647 313 385 212 519
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 123
PER ACRE POPULATION AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT COMPARISON BY DISTRICT
Pacifica Daly City South San
Francisco San Bruno Millbrae Half Moon Bay
Population Per Acre 5 22 11 13 11 3
Retail SF Per Acre 130 930 440 780 590 470
Shopping Center SF Per Acre 70 540 110 480 120 90
Office SF Per Acre 20 310 1,270 540 190 80
Industrial / Flex SF Per Acre 20 300 3,930 220 60 90
Commercial SF Per Acre 170 1,530 5,640 1,540 830 640
Hotel Rooms Per Acre 0.04 0.06 0.57 0.19 0.58 0.18
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar, 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 124
PACIFICA MAJOR EMPLOYERS
Major Employers in Pacifica
Major Employer Type Employees
Pacifica School District Education 383
City of Pacifica Government 244
Safeway (3) Retail 262
Jefferson High School District Education 108
Oceana Market Retail 55
Ace Hardware Retail 14
Recology of the Coast Waste Management 37
Rite Aid (2) Retail 34
Ross Dress for Less Retail 31
North Coast County Water District Government 18
Source: City of Pacifica ACFR (FY2021)
7.a
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 125
WORKER INFLOW / OUTFLOW
CITY SEES SUBSTANTIAL NET OUTFLOW OF WORKERS COMMUTING TO OTHER COMMUNITIES Workers employed in the City
but living outside
Workers living & employed in
the City
Workers living in the City but
employed outside
Worker Inflow/Outflow (2019)
Workers Living & Working 1,627
Workers Coming (Inflow) 3,520
Workers Going (Outflow) 19,260
Net Inflow/Outflow - 15,740
Employment Ratio* 0.25
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic
Studies (2019, accessed 2022)
Notes: *Employment Ratio = People employed
within City (living and working in City + those who
come into the City for work) / Employed population of
City (living and working in City + workers who live in
the City, but work outside of the City)
7.a
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 126
Outflow:
Where Pacifica Residents Commute To
City Count Percentage
San Francisco 7,480 35.8%
Pacifica 1,627 7.8%
South San Francisco 1,498 7.2%
San Mateo 777 3.7%
Daly City 675 3.2%
Burlingame 573 2.7%
San Jose 513 2.5%
Redwood City 503 2.4%
Oakland 476 2.3%
Palo Alto 372 1.8%
Other Locations 6,393 31%
Inflow:
Where Pacifica Workers Come From
City Count Percentage
Pacifica 1,627 31.6%
San Francisco 781 15.2%
Daly City 440 8.5%
South San Francisco 233 4.5%
San Bruno 169 3.3%
San Mateo 152 3.0%
San Jose 118 2.3%
Oakland 86 1.7%
Hayward 53 1.0%
Half Moon Bay 46 0.9%
Other Locations 1,442 28%
WORKER
DESTINATIONS &
ORIGINS
CITY OF PACIFICA
Workers who live in Pacifica primarily
work in San Francisco, Pacifica, South
San Francisco, San Mateo, and Daly
City.
Employees who work in Pacifica
primarily live in Pacifica, San Francisco,
Daly City, South San Francisco, and
San Bruno.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies, OnTheMap, 2019; accessed 2022
7.a
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 127
Workers Employed Within City
Sector Percentage
Accommodation and Food Services 17.3%
Educational Services 16.1%
Health Care and Social Assistance 14.3%
Retail Trade 12.4%
Construction 10.2%
Administration & Support, Waste Management
and Remediation 5.0%
Public Administration 4.5%
Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 4.4%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 4.0%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 3.1%
Manufacturing 2.9%
Finance and Insurance 1.8%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1.6%
Utilities 0.7%
Transportation and Warehousing 0.6%
Wholesale Trade 0.6%
Information 0.6%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 0.1%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 0.0%
City Resident Employed Population
(Age 16+)
Sector Percentage
Health Care and Social Assistance 13.1%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 11.4%
Educational Services 10.2%
Accommodation and Food Services 9.6%
Retail Trade 8.5%
Construction 5.4%
Transportation and Warehousing 5.4%
Manufacturing 5.3%
Administration & Support, Waste Management
and Remediation 5.2%
Public Administration 4.6%
Information 4.4%
Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 3.5%
Finance and Insurance 3.4%
Wholesale Trade 2.9%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 2.2%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 1.7%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1.6%
Utilities 1.1%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 0.6%
WORKER
OCCUPATIONS
CITY OF PACIFICA
Workers who live in Pacifica primarily
work in the Healthcare, Professional /
Scientific / Technical Services,
Educational Services, and
Accommodation / Food Service
Industries.
Employees who work in Pacifica
primarily work in the Accommodation
/ Food Service, Educational services,
Healthcare, and Retail Trade
industries.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies, OnTheMap, 2019; accessed 2022 “Industries in which City residents work” “Jobs in the City”
7.a
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 128
B. GENERAL FUND REVENUE ANALYSIS
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
7.a
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 129
REVENUE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Pacifica receives ~71% of its General Fund revenue from taxes, of 2/3rds are property taxes and VLF, ~20% of its tax revenue from sales / cannabis taxes and balance from hotel and franchise taxes Sales Tax revenues have grown ~87% since 2012, or approx. 7% per year; Highest collections come from Restaurants / Hotels and Food / Drug, reflecting that modern retail resiliency is driven by essentials and experiences.
Highest percentage growth since 2012 in Building / Construction and Restaurants / Hotels. Growth in Building / Construction likely due to big jump in 2020 - 2022 related to pandemic-era renovation and construction (growth levels likely not sustainable moving forward).
Tax growth in past 5 years has been heavily weighted by County Pool allocations from growth in internet sales – Pacifica’s County Pool allocation grew ~12% annually since 2016, compared to local collections growth of ~4% Property Tax revenues have grown ~45% since 2012, or approx. 4.2% per year; Assessed Value growth driven by high real estate values and mark-to-market reassessments for long-held properties.
7.a
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 130
CITY TAX REVENUE OVERVIEW
FY2023
Budget
Property Taxes $ 15,181,300
Property Tax: VLF 5,922,400
Sales Tax 3,111,200
Cannabis Tax 825,000
Transient
Occupancy Tax 2,100,000
Utility Users Tax 1,905,600
Business License
Tax 516,600
Other Taxes 1,687,800
Total 31,249,900
Pacifica has faced budget deficits,
service reductions and inability to
fund specific projects in recent
years. The City needs to identify
opportunities that can spur
economic development and
increase revenues.
The majority of City tax revenue
comes from property taxes, with
only ~10% coming from sales taxes
and 7% from hotel TOT taxes
(much lower than state averages).
Property
Taxes
48%
Property
Tax: VLF
19%
Sales Tax
10%
Cannabis
Tax
3%
TOT
7%
Utility
Users Tax
6%
Business
License Tax
2%
Other
Taxes
5%
City of Pacifica:
FY2023 Budget - Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica
7.a
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 131
GENERAL FUND REVENUE
Taxes
71%
Licenses &
Permits
3%
InterGovernmental
12%
Current
Service Chgs.
8%
Other
5%
General Fund Revenue Sources
2021 2021 % CAGR
(2012-2021)
Property taxes $15,087,028 48% 4.2%
Sales Taxes 2,848,681 9% 7.2%
Franchise Tax 1,706,107 5% 0.7%
Other Taxes 9,026,832 29% 13.0%
Motor vehicle in lieu -
unrestricted 2,643,981 8% -1.5%
Investment earnings 9,364 0% -32.8%
Miscellaneous 204,939 1% -8.8%
Transfers -250,000 -1%
Total Governmental
Activities $31,276,932 4.7%
Source: City of Pacifica
7.a
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 132
HISTORIC TAX REVENUES BY SOURCE
*CAGR is Compound Annual Growth Rate
Source: Pacifica 2021 ACFR
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 CAGR * Property Taxes $10,434,510 $10,701,810 $11,275,518 $12,200,335 $12,445,509 $12,679,059 $13,780,294 $14,731,311 $13,030,713 $15,087,028 4.2% Sales Taxes 1,519,978 1,588,277 1,686,593 1,754,568 1,983,930 2,374,505 2,350,478 2,611,801 2,570,334 2,848,681 7.2% Franchise Tax 1,595,929 1,617,727 1,668,382 1,697,972 1,736,620 1,748,266 1,722,343 1,661,717 1,647,467 1,706,107 0.7% Other Taxes 3,005,388 3,152,723 3,329,647 3,529,485 3,710,615 3,749,159 4,904,111 5,340,307 8,572,837 9,026,832 13.0% Motor vehicle in
lieu - unrestricted 3,039,393 2,923,573 3,164,873 3,320,316 3,543,953 3,731,337 3,973,622 4,199,391 4,253,924 2,643,981 -1.5% Investment
earnings 334,475 164,114 184,700 29,979 -44,457 743,630 151,887 254,481 341,064 9,364 -32.8% Miscellaneous 469,780 357,630 537,867 259,197 1,481,757 846,648 505,076 2,384,463 571,114 204,939 -8.8% Transfers 200,000 410,000 15,715 -150 939,559 818,500 98,343 272,500 80,000 -250,000 Total
Governmental
Activities
$ 2 0 , 5 9 9 , 4 5 3 $ 2 0 , 9 1 5 , 8 5 4 $ 2 1 , 8 6 3 , 2 9 5 $ 2 2 , 7 9 1 , 7 0 2 $ 2 5 , 7 9 7 , 4 8 6 $ 2 6 , 6 9 1 , 1 0 4 $ 2 7 , 4 8 6 , 1 5 4 $ 3 1 , 4 5 5 , 9 7 1 $ 3 1 , 0 6 7 , 4 5 3 $ 3 1 , 2 7 6 , 9 3 2 4.7%
7.a
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 133
RETAIL SALES TRENDS
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Sales Growth
from 2016 Baseline
Pacifica Half Moon Bay
San Mateo County
Pacifica has seen steady sales growth since
2016 of approx. 3.8% annually on average.
While the Covid-19 pandemic led to a
~13% drop in sales tax revenues in 2020,
Pacifica has recovered. Also worth noting
that the City was not as heavily impacted
as Half Moon Bay or San Mateo County.
Source: California Department of Finance
7.a
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 134
TAXABLE SALES BY CATEGORY
LARGEST CATEGORIES ARE EATING / DRINKING & FOOD STORES
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020*
Taxable Sales By Category
Eating & Drinking Places Food Stores Service Stations Building Materials Auto Dealers & Supplies Other Retail Stores All Other Outlets 2020* %
Eating & Drinking Places $45,853,000 19%
Food Stores $30,462,000 12%
Service Stations $29,641,000 12%
Building Materials $5,955,000 2%
Auto Dealers & Supplies $4,728,000 2%
Other Retail Stores $52,880,000 22%
All Other Outlets $75,620,000 31%
TOTAL $245,139,000
Source: City of Pacifica ACFR FY2020-21
7.a
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 135
SALES TAX REVENUE BY BUSINESS DISTRICT
STRONG GROWTH AT SHARP PARK AND PEDRO POINT
Pacific
Manor
32%
Sharp
Park
Rockawy 15%
14%
Linda Mar
28%
Pedro
Point
8%
Other
3%
FY2022 Sales Tax Revenue by District
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Sales Tax Growth Since 2013
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL
7.a
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 136
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX TRENDS
Pacifica collects a 12% transient occupancy
tax (TOT) on hotel room and short-term
rental stays.
TOT revenues fell slightly during the Covid19 pandemic, but are expected to reach $2.1 million in FY 2022-23.
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2018-19
Actuals
2019-20
Actuals
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Amended
Budget
2022-23
Adopted
Budget
Transient Occupancy Tax
Source: City of Pacifica
7.a
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 137
PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS
Property Taxpayer Land Use Taxable Assessed Value Percentage of Total City Taxable Assessed Value
FPA WC Lands End LLC Multifamily Residential $90,842,000 1.30% AIMCO Pacifica Park Apartments Multifamily Residential $57,039,000 0.82% GRI Fairmont LLC Shopping Center $39,250,000 0.56%
Linda Mar Shopping Center, LLP Shopping Center $38,446,000 0.55% Pacifica Villages LP Multifamily Residential $32,229,000 0.46% CRP/PSE Seaside Pacifica Owner Mobile Home Park $26,506,000 0.38% 2400 Skyline Blvd LLC Multifamily Residential $18,185,000 0.26% Bay Apartment Communities, Inc. Multifamily Residential $16,307,000 0.23% Upsky Lighthouse Hotel LLC Hotel $15,322,000 0.22%
LBN Properties LP Multifamily Residential $15,092,000 0.22% Source: City of Pacifica ACFR FY2020-21
7.a
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 138
ILLUSTRATIVE FISCAL IMPACT OF NEW DEVELOPMENT
To evaluate Pacifica economic opportunities, here is an illustration of incremental tax revenues potentially generated from various types of development on a typical 1-acre parcel:
10,000 SF
Commercial
Services
10,000 SF
Retail
10,000 SF
Restaurant
50-unit
Multifamily
Housing
Mixed Use
40-units &
5,000 SF
60-room
Upscale Hotel
Property Taxes
+ VLF in-lieu $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 $65,000 $55,000 $50,000 Direct Sales &
Use Taxes $25,000 $50,000 $75,000 $25,000
Indirect Sales &
Use Taxes $20,000 $15,000 $35,000
Hotel
TOT $300,000
Annual
General Fund
Revenues
$35,000 $60,000 $90,000 $85,000 $95,000 $385,000
Source: Estimates are for first stabilized year in 2023 dollars (does not include any inflationary impacts).
7.a
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 139
C. MARKET ANALYSIS
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
7.a
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 140
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE OVERVIEW
CITY OF PACIFICA
Retail Office Industrial Multifamily
Major Shopping Centers include:
• Linda Mar Shopping Center,
a 168k+ SF community
center featuring Safeway,
Ross Dress for Less, Rite
Aid
• Fairmont Shopping Center, a
120k+ SF neighborhood
center featuring Safeway,
Rite Aid
• Eureka Square, a 93k+ SF
neighborhood center
featuring smaller retail
shops / restaurants
• Several other neighborhood
and strip retail centers
Limited office development; Major
office properties include:
• 930 Oddstad Rd, ~20k SF office
occupied by Laguna Salada
School District
• 2307 Palmetto Ave, ~12k SF
office condo occupied by small
professional tenants
• 1305 Palmetto Ave, 12k SF office
occupied by small professional /
retail tenants
Limited industrial development;
major industrial properties include:
• Pacifica Commerce Center,
~49k SF light warehouse /
industrial park space, occupied
by small industrial and retail
tenants
• 1080 Palmetto Ave, ~26k SF
manufacturing space, occupied
by food manufacturing / bakery
• 325 Reina Del Mar Ave, ~13k SF
service industrial space
occupied by Blue Sky Taxi
Larger apartment complexes
include:
• 100 Esplanade Ave, Oceanaire
Apartment Homes, 260 units
built in 1974
• 265 Gateway Drive, eaves
Pacifica, 220 units built 1971
• 300 Palmetto Ave, Seacliff
Apartments, 132 units built in
1972
Source: CoStar (Accessed June/July 2022)
7.a
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 141
COAST HIGHWAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Traffic count estimates for a section of CA-1 just south of Pedro Point shows an average daily traffic volume (ADV) of ~21,000 cars total (~51% southbound traffic).
The highest days for travel along the route are Friday (24.1k ADV) and Saturday (23.6k ADV), and the lowest are Wednesdays (19k ADV)
Travel tends to peak during the day between 12pm - 6pm, reaching ~2,000 cars / hour on Saturdays and Sundays between 12pm and 2pm.
Northbound traffic patterns are similar with more volume on weekday mornings
Pacifica sees a relatively high level of travel along Coast Highway, with an estimated 10,700 trips passing the City southbound (~91% of those trips are from travelers who live outside Pacifica).
Southbound Traffic Volume:
CA-1 South of Pedro Point
Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Sun
12am - 2am 47 41 41 44 52 73 67
2am - 4am 32 30 30 34 37 39 33
4am - 6am 83 80 77 81 83 59 42
6am - 8am 276 292 273 283 287 210 152
8am -10am 515 496 475 505 546 562 463
10am - 12pm 742 658 641 696 810 970 918
12pm - 2pm 848 758 745 803 968 1091 1078
2pm - 4pm 879 819 783 853 1025 1013 982
4pm - 6pm 835 829 788 844 995 843 773
6pm - 8pm 520 527 512 569 709 577 505
8pm - 10pm 259 266 269 308 404 339 277
10pm - 12am 113 110 114 140 212 184 122
TOTAL 10,298 9,812 9,496 10,320 12,256 11,920 10,824
Source: Placer.ai
7.a
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 142
TRAFFIC VISITOR DATA
According to Placer.ai mobile analytics data, visitors who travel through this point on CA-1 just south of
Pedro Point are overwhelming from home locations
outside of Pacifica: ~9% of travelers are from Pacifica, ~32% from Half Moon Bay area, ~12% from San
Francisco, ~4% from Daly City, ~2% from South San
Francisco, and the remainder from a wide variety of
other cities in the Bay Area and beyond.
Prior to / after traveling through the point on CA-1, some of the most common locations are restaurants /
hotels in Half Moon Bay and nearby beach / hiking
locations.
Top 20 Prior / Post Locations
1. Sam’s Chowder House, Half Moon Bay 11. Oceano Hotel, Half Moon Bay
2. Pacifica State Beach, Pacifica 12. The Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay
3. Montara Mountain, Montara 13. Ross Dress For Less, Pacifica
4. Safeway (Linda Mar), Pacifica 14. Grocery Outlet Bargain Market, Pacifica
5. Half Moon Bay Harbor, Half Moon Bay 15. Poplar Beach, Half Moon Bay
6. Barbara’s Fish Trap, Half Moon Bay 16. Ketch Joanne, Half Moon Bay
7. James V. Fitzgerald Marine Reserve,
Moss Beach
17. Mezza Luna Restaurant, Half Moon
Bay
8. Half Moon Bay Brewing Company, Half
Moon Bay 18. Pillar Point Harbor, Half Moon Bay
9. San Francisco International Airport,
San Francisco 19. Moss Beach Distillery, Moss Beach
10. Montara State Beach, Montara 20. Half Moon Bay Golf Links, Half Moon Bay
Source: Placer.ai
7.a
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 143
FOG FEST PLACER.AI DATA
Placer.ai data was used to analyze Fog Fest visitors:
Approx. 36,100 visits from 31,500 visitors came to the Palmetto area on Fog Fest weekend in 2022, six times
the normal level of weekend visits and ~20% higher
than prior years.
These visitors have average household incomes of
$122,000, similar to income levels of typical weekend
visitors.
Median dwell time was ~80 minutes, approximately
50% longer than a typical weekend visit.
Most visits were from visitors with home locations in Pacifica and other Bay Area cities, with ~7% of visitor home locations greater than 50 miles away.
Visit Estimates Saturday Sunday Total
Typical Weekend (2022) 3,400 2,900 6,300
Fog Fest 2022 20,000 16,100 36,100
Fog Fest 2019 16,900 12,200 29,100
Fog Fest 2018 15,700 13,800 29,500
Fog Fest 2017 18,800 13,200 32,000
Fog Fest 2022: Visits by City of Home Origin
City % City %
Pacifica 19% San Pablo 2%
San Francisco 16% San Mateo 2%
Daly City 8% Redwood City 2%
S. San Francisco 5% Oakland 2%
San Bruno 4% Sacramento 1%
Source: Placer.ai San Jose 3% Fremont 1%
7.a
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 144
SHARP PARK GOLF COURSE PLACER.AI DATA
Placer.ai data was used to analyze visitors to the Sharp Park Golf Course who spent at least one hour at the
location:
Approx. 66,100 visits from 26,100 visitors came to the Sharp Park Golf Course over the past year.
Visits peak in May / June; peak day is Tuesday, followed by Friday – Sunday; peak time is noon, with 48% of visits
occurring between 10am and 3pm.
Visitors have average household incomes of $138,000.
Most visits were from visitors with home locations in San Francisco, Pacifica, and other nearby cities, with ~10% of visitor home locations greater than 50 miles away.
Sharp Park Golf Course: Visits by City of Home Origin
City % City %
San Francisco 32% South San Francisco 2%
Pacifica 24% Burlingame 2%
San Mateo 6% San Jose 2%
Daly City 3% Half Moon Bay 2%
Belmont 3% Rocklin 1%
Source: Placer.ai; data filtered for visitors who stay for greater than one hour
7.a
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 145
HOTEL PLACER.AI DATA
Placer.ai data was used to analyze overnight visitors to the hotels in Pacifica over the past year. According to this data, the Rockaway Beach Plaza area saw 122,400 overnight visits over the past year; these visits were split fairly evenly between the Fairfield Inn, Pacifica Lighthouse Wyndham, and Inn at Rockaway. The Pacifica Beach Hotel saw ~43,000
visits.
Visits peak in July; peak day is Friday, with ~57% of visits occurring Friday - Sunday.
Approx. 65% of visits are from visitors >30 miles away, and 79% of visits are from California visitors.
Fairfield Inn draws a higher percentage of visits from longer distances: ~52% of visits from visitors >250 miles away, compared to 27% for Rockaway Beach Plaza overall.
Visitors to the Rockaway hotel area have average household incomes of $112,000.
Source: Placer.ai; data filtered for visitors who stay for greater than 2.5 hours between 1am and 6am to assess overnight visits Rockaway Beach Plaza: Overnight Visits by Home City
City % City %
California Cities
Pacifica 9% Millbrae 3%
San Francisco 5% Hayward 2%
Daly City 4% S. San Francisco 2%
San Jose 3% Stockton 2%
Sacramento 3% El Centro 2%
Visitors from Other States
Nevada (Reno, Las Vegas,
Carson City) 3% Colorado (Littleton, Denver, Co. Springs) 1% Texas (Houston, Austin,
DFW) 2% Oregon (Portland, Eugene) 1%
Washington (Seattle,
Vancouver, Bellevue) 2% New York (NYC, New Paltz 1%
Arizona (Phoenix,
Scottsdale) 1% Georgia (Atlanta suburbs) 1%
7.a
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 146
PACIFICA
MAJOR SHOPPING
CENTERS WITHIN
5-MILE RADIUS
Sources:
ESRI Business Analyst Online
CoStar (Accessed June/July 2022)
5-Mile Radius
Regional Mall
Power / Outlet Centers
Community Centers
Neighborhood Centers
~12.96 million SF Shopping Center Inventory
in San Mateo County
~769,700 2022 San Mateo County
Population
~16.8 SF per
capita
Shopping Center SF per
capita in San Mateo
County
~15.2 SF per
capita City of Pacifica
Shops at Tanforan
JCPenney, Target, PETCO
1.12 million SF
Serramonte Center
Macy’s, Target, Dick’s Sporting Goods
1.15 million SF
Linda Mar Shopping Center
Safeway, Ross Dress For Less, Rite Aid
168k SF
Pedro Point Shopping Center
Grocery Outlet
32.5k SF
Eureka Square
Oceana Market, Plato’s Closet
93.6k SF
Fairmont Shopping Center
Safeway, Rite Aid
120k SF
280 Metro Center
Home Depot, Best Buy, Marshalls
342k SF
Westlake Shopping Center
Home Depot, Safeway, Burlington, Target
693k SF
San Bruno Towne Center
Lowe’s, Lucky, Marshalls
342k SF
7.a
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 147
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Shopping Center Visitor Performance:
Comparison to Pre-Covid Baseline
Fairmont Shopping Center Pacific Manor Shopping Center
Eureka Shopping Center Linda Mar Shopping Center
Pedro Point Shopping Center
PACIFICA
SHOPPING
CENTER VISITOR
PERFORMANCE
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed June/July 2022)
Median
Weekly
Visits
July % Chng.
Pre-Covid
Baseline
Fairmont
Shopping Center 29,800 + 1%
Eureka
Shopping Center 9,200 + 43%
Pacific Manor
Shopping Center 16,800 + 68%
Linda Mar
Shopping Center 40,500 + 12%
Pedro Point
Shopping Center 16,400 + 23%
7.a
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 148
PACIFICA
RESIDENTS
RETAIL SUPPLY &
DEMAND
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed July/August 2022)
As expected for a small
community, Pacifica has significant
retail leakage in many categories:
Demand Supply Surplus/Leakage
Auto & Fuel $ 263,900,000 $ 30,800,000 ($233,100,000) -88% Home Furnishings,
Hardware, Garden 76,100,000 13,200,000 ($62,900,000) -83% Food and Drugs 166,700,000 89,900,000 ($76,800,000) -46% E-Commerce 169,600,000 5,800,000 ($163,800,000) -97%
Consumer Goods 184,700,000 99,600,000 ($85,100,000) -46% Restaurants 68,500,000 65,400,000 ($3,100,000) -5%
Other 25,700,000 10,200,000 ($15,500,000) -60%
Total $ 955,100,000 $ 314,900,000 ($640,200,000) -67%
7.a
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 149
PACIFICA
RESIDENTS
TOP VISITED
PLACES –
PLACER.AI
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed December 2022)
Shopping Centers
Location City %
Serramonte Center Daly City 74%
Linda Mar Shopping Center Pacifica 61%
Serra Shopping Center Colma 50%
Pacific Manor Shopping Center Pacifica 48%
280 Metro Center Colma 47%
Fairmont Shopping Center Pacifica 47%
The Shops at Tanforan San Bruno 44%
Pedro Point Shopping Center Pacifica 43%
Westlake Shopping Center Daly City 42%
Rockaway Beach Plaza Pacifica 42%
Grocery Stores
Location City %
Safeway (Linda Mar SC) Pacifica 44%
Safeway (Manor Plaza) Pacifica 33%
Safeway (Hickey Blvd) Pacifica 33%
Grocery Outlet Bargain
Market Pacifica 29%
Oceana Market Pacifica 21%
Safeway South San Francisco 17%
Trader Joe's South San Francisco 14%
Sun Valley Fine Food Pacifica 13%
99 Ranch Market Daly City 12%
Seafood City South San Francisco 12%
Home Improvement / Home Furnishings
Location City %
The Home Depot Colma 26%
Lowe's San Bruno 14%
Linda Mar Ace Home Center Pacifica 11%
Bed Bath & Beyond Daly City 9%
The Home Depot Daly City 9%
Cost Plus World Market Daly City 8%
Pacific Manor Hardware Pacifica 7%
The Home Depot Colma 7%
IKEA East Palo Alto 7%
Living Spaces Millbrae 4%
Super Stores
Location City %
Target (Serramonte Center) Daly City 45%
Costco Wholesale (El Camino) So. San Francisco 39%
Target Colma 33%
Costco Wholesale (Airport Blvd) So. San Francisco 23%
Target San Bruno 15%
Costco Wholesale (Dubuque Ave) So. San Francisco 9%
7.a
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 150
PACIFICA
RESIDENTS
TOP VISITED
PLACES –
PLACER.AI
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed December 2022)
Shops (Select Categories)
Location City %
Dollar Tree Pacifica 22%
Michaels Colma 19%
Pet Food Express Pacifica 17%
PetSmart Daly City 15%
Nor Cal Surf Shop Pacifica 11%
Party City Daly City 9%
Florey's Book Co. Pacifica 6%
Dollar Tree S San Francisco 5%
Manor Music Pacifica 5%
Tons of Bubbles Pacifica 4%
Pharmacy
Location City %
Rite Aid Pacifica 30%
Walgreens Pacifica 28%
Rite Aid Pacifica 11%
CVS Daly City 7%
CVS San Bruno 3%
Walgreens So. San Francisco 2%
Walgreens Daly City 2%
Walgreens Millbrae 2%
Rite Aid Half Moon Bay 2%
CVS Burlingame 2%
Bars & Pubs
Location City %
The Longboard Margarita Bar Pacifica 12%
Pacifica Brewery Pacifica 9%
Half Moon Bay Brewing Company Half Moon Bay 6%
Winters Tavern Pacifica 6%
Humble Sea Brewing Co. Pacifica 6%
Moose Lodge Pacifica 6%
Grape In The Fog A Pacifica 5%
Old Princeton Landing Half Moon Bay 3%
Pedro Point Brewing Pacifica 2%
Fiddlers Green, Millbrae Millbrae 2%
Restaurants
Location City %
Original Joe's Westlake Daly City 15%
La Playa Pacifica 12%
Sizzler Colma 9%
Grand HotPot Pacifica 9%
Chevys Fresh Mex So. San Francisco 9%
Taqueria la Mordida Pacifica 9%
Moonraker Restaurant Pacifica 9%
Beach Monkey Organic Café Pacifica 8%
Taqueria El Gran Amigo Pacifica 8%
Black Bear Diner Colma 8%
7.a
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 151
PACIFICA
RESIDENTS
TOP VISITED
PLACES –
PLACER.AI
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed December 2022)
Hotels / Casinos (Local)
Location City %
Sea Breeze Motel Pacifica 18%
Pacifica Lighthouse, Trademark
Collection by Wyndham Pacifica 11%
Pacifica Beach Hotel Pacifica 11%
Lucky Chances Casino Colma 5%
Fairfield Inn Pacifica 4%
Artichoke Joe's Casino San Bruno 4%
Graton Resort and Casino Rohnert Park 3%
Inn at Rockaway Pacifica 2%
Hyatt Regency Burlingame 2%
The Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay 2%
Attractions (Local)
Location City %
Sea Bowl Pacifica 15%
Chase Center San Francisco 9%
Sharp Park Golf Course Pacifica 9%
Pacifica Fog Fest Pacifica 8%
Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk Santa Cruz 8%
Classic Bowling Center Daly City 7%
California's Great America Santa Clara 7%
Pacifica Community Center Pacifica 6%
Maker Faire San Mateo 5%
Jean Brink Pool Pacifica 5%
Theaters & Music Venues
Location City %
Century 20 Daly City Daly City 20%
Century 10 Theatre San Bruno 9%
Century at Tanforan and XD San Bruno 8%
Century Theatres San Bruno 7%
Century Theatres Daly City 6%
Terra Nova Theater Pacifica 5%
Century Theatres San Mateo 3%
Warfield Theatre San Francisco 3%
Orpheum Theatre San Francisco 2%
Pacifica Spindrift Players Pacifica 2%
Fitness
Location City %
Pacifica Athletic Center Pacifica 10%
Crunch Fitness Daly City 8%
24 Hour Fitness Pacifica 7%
Anytime Fitness Pacifica 7%
Orangetheory Fitness Pacifica 7%
Ocean Yoga Pacifica 3%
iLoveKickboxing Pacifica 3%
24 Hour Fitness Daly City 2%
Training For Warriors Pacifica 2%
Terra Nova Fitness Pacifica 2%
7.a
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 152
RETAIL MARKET HISTORY
CITY OF PACIFICA
Year Inventory SF Vacant SF Total Vacant Percent
% Total
Net Absorption
SF Total
Market
Rent
2022 YTD 1,009,317 28,526 2.8% (6,638) $28.91
2021 1,009,317 21,888 2.2% 8,065 $29.78
2020 1,009,317 29,953 3.0% (12,027) $30.12
2019 1,006,213 14,822 1.5% 1,465 $30.13
2018 1,002,013 12,087 1.2% 11,865 $29.15
2017 1,001,401 23,340 2.3% (8,564) $28.33
2016 1,001,401 14,776 1.5% 33,631 $26.98
2015 1,001,401 48,407 4.8% (38,034) $25.93
2014 1,010,901 19,873 2.0% 27,432 $24.57
2013 1,007,801 44,205 4.4% (656) $23.27
2012 1,007,801 43,549 4.3% 798 $22.40
Source: CoStar (Accessed October 2022)
City retail inventory has remained virtually unchanged over the past 10 years at 1 million SF, with vacancy at 2.8% and annual market rents at $29 psf. 0%
2%
4%
6%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Market Rent
7.a
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 153
RETAIL MARKET HISTORY
PENINSULA COASTLINE SUBMARKET
Year Inventory SF Vacant SF Total Vacant Percent
% Total
Net Absorption
SF Total
NNN Rent
Overall
2022 YTD 3,093,524 44,584 1.4% (3,633) $39.43
2021 3,092,724 40,951 1.3% 3,828 $34.93
2020 3,092,724 44,779 1.4% (11,757) $36.31
2019 3,089,620 29,918 1.0% 708 $28.98
2018 3,085,420 26,426 0.9% 32,850 $61.80
2017 3,075,696 49,552 1.6% (15,592) $48.69
2016 3,075,696 33,960 1.1% 40,372 $26.69
2015 3,075,696 74,332 2.4% (38,421) $24.61
2014 3,085,196 45,411 1.5% 24,470 $25.05
2013 3,082,096 66,781 2.2% 578 $20.57
2012 3,083,777 69,040 2.2% (6,210) $20.51
2011 3,097,281 76,334 2.5% (13,438) $21.51
2010 3,097,281 62,896 2.0% (6,815) $24.85
2009 3,104,371 63,171 2.0% 829 $29.45
2008 3,079,290 38,919 1.3% 27,190 $22.70
Source: CoStar (Accessed June/July 2022)
Note: Costar defines Triple Net (NNN) as “a lease where the tenant is responsible for all expenses associated with their proportional share of occupancy of the building, except long-lived structural components and management charges.” 0%
2%
4%
6%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
$0
$20
$40
$60
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 NNN Rent
7.a
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 154
Year Inventory SF Vacant SF Total Vacant Percent
% Total
Net Absorption
SF Total
Base Rent
Overall
2022 YTD 173,790 4,363 2.5% (949) $42.41
2021 173,790 3,414 2.0% (2,214) $42.89
2020 173,790 1,200 0.7% - $43.84
2019 173,790 1,200 0.7% 2,282 $51.80
2018 173,790 3,482 2.0% (782) $49.39
2017 173,790 2,700 1.6% 1,085 $49.52
2016 173,790 3,785 2.2% 165 $48.09
2015 173,790 3,950 2.3% 2,414 $46.28
2014 173,790 6,364 3.7% 2,703 $40.55
2013 173,790 9,067 5.2% 19,983 $34.45
2012 173,790 29,050 16.7% (4,950) $31.82
Source: CoStar (Accessed October 2022)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
OFFICE MARKET HISTORY
CITY OF PACIFICA
City office inventory has remained unchanged over the past 10 years at ~174k SF, with current vacancy at ~2.5% and annual market rents at ~$42 psf. $0
$20
$40
$60
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Market Rent
7.a
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 155
OFFICE MARKET HISTORY
PENINSULA COASTLINE SUBMARKET
Year Inventory SF Vacant SF Total Vacant Percent
% Total
Net Absorption
SF Total
Base Rent
Overall
2022 YTD 665,218 34,335 5.2% (2,268) $32.20
2021 665,218 32,067 4.8% (4,374) $31.01
2020 665,218 27,693 4.2% (5,047) $25.90
2019 665,218 22,646 3.4% 17,087 $26.30
2018 667,594 42,109 6.3% (9,271) $26.31
2017 662,352 27,596 4.2% 15,151 $27.25
2016 663,773 44,168 6.7% 8,176 $28.12
2015 663,773 52,344 7.9% 390 $26.18
2014 665,773 54,734 8.2% (10,475) $24.57
2013 662,150 40,636 6.1% 7,050 $21.63
2012 662,150 47,686 7.2% 3,506 $25.74
2011 662,150 51,192 7.7% (7,206) $29.97
2010 662,150 43,986 6.6% 8,103 $24.47
2009 660,312 50,251 7.6% (4,020) $26.28
2008 660,312 46,231 7.0% (76) 26.33
Source: CoStar (Accessed June/July 2022)
Note: Costar defines Full Service / Gross Rent as “a rental rate that includes normal building standard services which are provided and paid by the landlord.”
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Base Rent
7.a
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 156
MULTIFAMILY MARKET HISTORY
CITY OF PACIFICA
Year Inventory
Units Vacant Units Vacancy Percent
Net
Absorption
(Units)
Asking Rent
(Unit/Mo.)
Asking Rent
(SF/Mo.)
2022 YTD 1,775 67 3.8% (2) $2,777 $3.69
2021 1,775 65 3.7% 42 $2,627 $3.49
2020 1,775 106 6.0% (57) $2,480 $3.29
2019 1,775 49 2.8% 22 $2,702 $3.59
2018 1,775 71 4.0% 27 $2,648 $3.52
2017 1,775 98 5.5% (26) $2,500 $3.32
2016 1,795 92 5.1% (23) $2,557 $3.40
2015 1,827 100 5.5% (30) $2,500 $3.32
2014 1,827 70 3.8% (2) $2,274 $3.02
2013 1,827 69 3.8% 13 $2,173 $2.89
2012 1,827 82 4.5% 32 $2,035 $2.70
Source: CoStar (Accessed October 2022)
Note: Costar defines Asking Rent as “average monthly amount the lessor is asking for in order to lease their building/space/land.” Analytic filters exclude senior / student / military / corporation / vacation housing / co-ops /manufactured housing; limits search to buildings with 5+ units; and Market / Market Affordable rent types. 0%
5%
10%
15%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2022
YTD
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Asking Rent
City multifamily inventory has declined by ~52 units over the past 10 years, with current vacancy at ~3.8% and monthly asking rents steadily increasing to $2,777 per unit.
7.a
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 157
FOR-SALE HOUSING MARKET HISTORY CONTEXT
Source: CRMLS (Accessed June/July 2022)
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
$2,000,000
Jan-08
Nov-08
Sep-09
Jul-10
May-11
Mar-12
Jan-13
Nov-13
Sep-14
Jul-15
May-16
Mar-17
Jan-18
Nov-18
Sep-19
Jul-20
May-21
Mar-22
Median Home Sale Price
Rolling 12-Month Average
Pacifica San Mateo County
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 Jan-08
Sep-08
May-09
Jan-10
Sep-10
May-11
Jan-12
Sep-12
May-13
Jan-14
Sep-14
May-15
Jan-16
Sep-16
May-17
Jan-18
Sep-18
May-19
Jan-20
Sep-20
May-21
Jan-22
Inventory - Months Supply
12-Month Rolling Average
Pacifica San Mateo County
7.a
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 158
HOSPITALITY SUMMARY
Pacifica is within easy reach of San Francisco, and has the potential to accommodate hundreds of nightly
visitors at a much lower cost than SF hotels.
Pacifica has a limited inventory of hotel rooms within the City limits, totaling ~313 rooms (with one
proposed property of 108 rooms).
The San Francisco / San Mateo / Marin County
hospitality market is home to 55,600 rooms, with 12-
mo occupancy at 55% and 12-month ADR at $215.
The San Francisco Area* hospitality submarket
(excludes City of San Francisco, airport area, and cities of San Mateo / Redwood City) has ~4,300 rooms, with
12-mo occupancy at 67% and 12-mo ADR at $220.
Hotel Rooms Class Year Built /
Renovated
Fairfield Inn & Suites San Francisco
Pacifica 88 Upper Midscale 2022
Pacifica Beach Hotel 52 Upper Upscale 2000
Americas Best Value Inn 25 Economy 1990
Sea Breeze Motel 20 Midscale 1953
Pacifica Lighthouse Hotel Trademark 97 Upper Midscale 2006 Pacifica Motor Inn 31 Upper Midscale 2018
PROPOSED
Hampton Inn & Suites Pacifica 108 Upper Midscale 2024*
Source: CoStar, June / July 2022
Source: CoStar, accessed June/July 2022
Note: CoStar’s San Francisco Area Hospitality Submarket includes Marin County, coastal San Mateo County, Daly City, Brisbane, parts of San Francisco south of I-280, and parts of Woodside / Redwood City / Portola Valley
7.a
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 159
HOSPITALITY
SUMMARY
SAN FRANCISCO / SAN
MATEO MARKET &
SAN FRANCISCO AREA
SUBMARKET (MARIN
COUNTY, DALY CITY,
PACIFICA, HALF MOON
BAY)
Sources:
CoStar (Accessed July/August 2022)
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022 12-Month ADR
Market Submarket
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022 12-Month Occupancy
Market Submarket
7.a
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 160
PACIFICA AREA – HOTEL PROPERTY SUMMARY
Property Name Property Address City Hotel Class Rooms Opened Bldg Class
Operation
Type
Mtg
Space Restaurant
Pacifica Beach Hotel 525 Crespi Dr Pacifica Upper Upscale 52 2003 B Franchise 300 No Fairfield Inn & Suites San Francisco Pacifica 500 Old County Rd Pacifica Upper Midscale 88 1999 C Independent 6,750 Yes Pacifica Lighthouse Hotel Trademark Collection by
Wyndham 101-195 Rockaway Beach Ave Pacifica Upper Midscale 97 1981 B Franchise No Pacifica Motor Inn 200 Rockaway Beach Ave Pacifica Upper Midscale 31 1986 C Independent 2,000 No Sea Breeze Motel 100-104 Rockaway Beach Ave Pacifica Midscale 20 1961 C Franchise 5,000 Yes Americas Best Value Inn San Francisco Pacifica 2160 Francisco Blvd Pacifica Economy 25 C Independent No Ocean View Inn 8425 Cabrillo Hwy Montara Luxury 9 C Yes Seal Cove Inn 221 Cypress Ave Moss Beach Luxury 10 C Independent No Harbor View Inn 51 Avenue Alhambra El Granada Upper Upscale 17 1985 C Independent No Oceano Inn 380 Capistrano Rd Princeton Upper Midscale 11 1986 C Independent No Beach House Half Moon Bay 4100 Cabrillo Hwy N Half Moon Bay Luxury 54 1996 B Independent Yes Oceano Hotel & Spa 240 Capistrano Rd Half Moon Bay Luxury 95 2008 B Franchise 1,750 No Mill Rose Inn 615 Mill St Half Moon Bay Luxury 6 1982 C Independent No Cypress Inn On Miramar Beach 407 Mirada Rd Half Moon Bay Luxury 18 2002 C Independent 1,800 No Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay 1 Miramontes Point Rd Half Moon Bay Luxury 261 2001 A Independent No Half Moon Bay Lodge 2400 S Cabrillo Hwy Half Moon Bay Upper Upscale 80 1976 C Franchise 120 Yes Nantucket Whale Inn 779 Main St Half Moon Bay Upper Upscale 7 2015 C Independent 3,600 No Landis Shores Oceanfront Inn 207-211 Mirada Rd Half Moon Bay Upper Upscale 8 C Independent 8,000 Yes Half Moon Bay Inn 401 Main St Half Moon Bay Upper Upscale 15 1932 C Independent Yes Zaballa House 324-328 Main St Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 20 1985 C Independent No The Miramar Inn & Suites 3020 Cabrillo Hwy N Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 27 1991 C Independent 160 No Coastside Inn 230 Cabrillo Hwy S Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 52 1991 B No BW Signature Collection Camerons Inn 1400-1410 Cabrillo Hwy S Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 46 2018 C Independent No San Benito House 356 Main St Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 12 C Chain Mgmt 13,000 Yes Quality Inn Half Moon Bay 2930 Cabrillo Hwy N Half Moon Bay Midscale 54 1999 C Independent Yes Source: CoStar
7.a
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 161
D. STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH / SURVEY
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
7.a
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 162
OUTREACH AND SURVEY OVERVIEW
Virtual
Community
Workshop
Online Survey
Stakeholder
Outreach
Meetings
Community
Meeting
17+ participants in
virtual community
outreach meeting
in August 2022
167 respondents to
online survey in
August –
September 2022
12+ virtual / inperson meetings
with targeted
stakeholders
12+ participants at
community meeting
in November 2022
Kosmont worked with the City to conduct a variety of outreach efforts to solicit feedback from community members:
7.a
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 163
STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
City Staff Business Owners / Managers Community Groups
Kevin Woodhouse
Yulia Carter
Christian Murdock
Lisa Petersen
Olga Munoz – 7.3.1 Designs Gallery
Matt Kosoy – Rosalind Bakery
Pam Winston – Successories
Holly Smalley – Lytt Cannabis
Beth Lemke – Grape in a Fog
Chrystelle Azcona - Kimco
Steven Wright – Rotary Club
Amber Porter – Rotary, Tri County Bank
Daisy Fong – EDC Volunteer
James Crowe – Chamber, Fog Festival
Archie Judan – Chamber of Commerce
Judy Heldberg – Historical Society
7.a
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 164
COMMENTS FROM COMMUNITY / STAKEHOLDERS
Kosmont participated in meetings with City staff, Councilmembers, business leaders, as well as a virtual meeting with local residents to get their input on opportunities and challenges facing the City and its neighborhoods:
City has historic “no growth” sentiment and Coastal Commission is used as mechanism to appeal projects Residents want many City services but don’t acknowledge need for development to help fund them Budget constraints have reduced City staff in building and planning department; use of contract planners/inspectors has been problematic as contractors are often too stringent/by the book City has charged low development impact fees
Developers have been unsuccessful in getting approvals at Quarry site Residents are frustrated with lack of success from prior economic studies Lack of adequate commercial signage at many shopping centers (i.e., Eureka, Manor and Rockaway) Too many cannabis stores; residents want Trader Joe’s, but trade area population is too small
7.a
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 165
COMMUNITY / STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS (CONT’D)
Poor marketing by City and Chamber and consider joint effort with Half Moon Bay [also consider better slogan such as “Pacific-aah”, “everything starts here”] [businesses/art venues could benefit from social media] Fog Festival is major success story [consider more events to bring people together such as Dog Surfing, Sam’s Castle events, golf tournament, July 4th fireworks at the pier] Eliminate “can’t do attitude” and replace with “how to get to yes” Hotel use on Quarry site may be more acceptable than residential City infrastructure is poor and no funding is available Beach Blvd. hotel site is key catalyst for creating downtown feel for Palmetto Ave. New library / community center important
Create business incubator / “Shark Tank” event to encourage entrepreneurship
7.a
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 166
COMMUNITY OUTREACH VIRTUAL MEETING #1
Kosmont conducted a virtual community outreach meeting on August 29th. The following key themes were expressed:
Amenities: Beaches / ocean views / hiking / culture / proximity to SF are a big asset, but need improvement to take advantage of it New Uses: City could use more restaurants / bars / entertainment; shopping centers / commercial areas need to be refreshed Downtown: Need an area that acts as a “downtown”, shopping / dining oriented toward residents and visitors, mixed use / walkable areas, more people in the City during the week (without disrupting community) Drawing visitors / regional tourists: Need to better capture the dollars of people who are coming to Pacifica – need more restaurants, bars, shops, events, entertainment; leveraging coastal areas for big revenue drivers (hotel, restaurants, bars) Transportation: More transit options needed; traffic, congestion, and circulation challenges Infrastructure: Some concerns about infrastructure supporting existing / new uses Business Challenges: Some existing businesses face City permitting challenges; most activity on weekends, hard to sustain a business
Events: Fog Fest is a big attraction, more events can serve residents as well as draw visitors
7.a
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 167
COMMUNITY OUTREACH MEETING #2
Kosmont conducted a community outreach meeting on November 15th. The following key themes were expressed:
Beautification: Need better signage, lighting, tree planting, façade beautification, other activations Improving Main Street Quality: Palmetto area could use more engaging retail / restaurants in the area – unique walkable mix of local businesses, also needs a “bigger draw”; many Palmetto businesses close early, could use zoning to encourage businesses to stay open later
Coastal Opportunities: Coastal areas have good opportunity for boutique hotel, hotel revitalization, restaurants, open space, and related projects
Need for Balance: Balance new development targeting visitors and residents, but strive to keep “small town feel” Wayfinding / Signage: Need to help businesses with better signage, lack of freeway signage to identify business districts Events: Events should be used to increase activity, such as food trucks, markets; Chamber seems to have limited capacity to organize
Environmental / Infrastructure Concerns: Some expressed concern about sea level rise and other environmental challenges, as well as the cost of infrastructure / impact of construction feasibility Transportation: Electric charging stations could be a good amenity for shopping areas; poor transit to SF and beyond
7.a
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 168
SURVEY RESULTS
OVERVIEW
The online survey conducted between August and September 2022 provided vital feedback that will help plan for Pacifica’s future. 167 surveys were submitted, with ~96% of responses coming from Pacifica residents. 53% of respondents have lived in Pacifica for over 20 years, and 63% of respondents were at least 55 years old.
Results show that respondents are open to a wide variety of new businesses / developments in the City’s business districts, and highly value restaurant / dining options, leisure / entertainment venues, and places to gather. Respondents also highly value improvements to mobility / walkability / bike-ability / transit, safety improvements, and traffic flow. Many responses emphasized the importance of better utilizing Pacifica’s unique character and coastal amenities to create vibrant, walkable, engaging commercial areas that can better serve Pacifica’s residents and attract visitors.
7.a
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 169
SURVEY RESULTS
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
17%
16%
6%
36%
19%
24%
31%
18%
21%
25%
50%
46%
60%
32%
38%
9%
8%
16%
11%
17%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Pacific Manor / Fairmont
Sharp Park / Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar
Linda Mar / Sun Valley
Pedro Point
How Often Do You Visit The Following Business Districts? Very Often Often Sometimes Never
52%
37%
19%
13%
8%
7%
5%
4%
30%
29%
27%
18%
18%
12%
11%
7%
16%
20%
50%
52%
48%
48%
45%
56%
2%
15%
4%
17%
26%
34%
39%
33%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Essentials (grocery, home improvement, etc.)
Fitness / recreation / surfing / hiking
Dining / restaurants
Shopping
Personal Services – hair salon, dry cleaner, carwash
Leisure / entertainment
Professional Services – healthcare, business services, banking Arts / education / cultural
Do You Visit Pacifica Business Districts for the following purposes? Very Frequently Frequently Sometimes Never
Survey responses show that the Linda
Mar / Sun Valley and Sharp Park / Eureka
Square business districts were the most
frequently visited areas, while the
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar business
district was the least frequently visited.
Survey respondents were most likely to
frequently visit the Pacifica business
districts to shop for essentials, for fitness
/ recreation / surfing / hiking, and for
dining / restaurants. Respondents were
least likely to frequently visit the City’s
business districts for arts / education /
cultural, leisure / entertainment, personal
services, and professional services.
7.a
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 170
SURVEY RESULTS
NEW DEVELOPMENT,
IMPROVEMENTS, AND
AMENITIES
43%
30%
21%
22%
21%
27%
9%
8%
4%
5%
12%
42%
34%
44%
46%
41%
26%
32%
24%
33%
29%
22%
11%
29%
32%
25%
31%
25%
44%
52%
44%
49%
37%
4%
7%
3%
7%
7%
23%
15%
15%
19%
16%
30%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Restaurants and dining options
Leisure and entertainment uses / venues
Shopping and other retailers
Places where people can gather (small / large groups)
Arts / cultural / educational
Housing options
Fitness / health / wellness
Personal services
Office (e.g. medical/professional/other)
Professional services
Hotel / hospitality
What type of new additional businesses / developments would you like to see in the business districts?
Extremely Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important at all 51%
45%
51%
30%
28%
30%
23%
21%
35%
38%
30%
43%
42%
36%
32%
34%
13%
15%
16%
21%
27%
30%
36%
34%
1%
2%
3%
6%
4%
4%
9%
11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Mobility / walkability / bike - ability / transit
Safety
Traffic flow
Public art plazas, and walkways
Signage / wayfinding / lighting
Streetscape / design /built environment
Technological infrastructure
Parking infrastructure
Which improvements/amenities should the City focus on in the business districts?
Extremely Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important at all Respondents tend to value adding new
restaurant / dining options, leisure /
entertainment venues, and places where
people can gather to the business
districts. Adding housing was important
to over 50% of respondents.
Respondents also highly value improving
mobility / walkability / bike-ability /
transit, safety improvements, and traffic
flow.
7.a
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 171
SURVEY RESULTS
Survey results varied by the type of
respondent, offering insights into younger
residents, recent residents, and business
owners / commercial property owners.
Younger Residents
More likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… Less likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… •Restaurants and dining options
•Leisure and Entertainment uses /venues
•Fitness / health / wellness
•Mobility / walkability / bike-ability / transit
•Public art, plazas, and walkways
•Parking Infrastructure
•Traffic Flow
Recent Residents
More likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… Less likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… •Restaurants and dining options
•Fitness / health / wellness
•Places where people can gather
•Streetscape / design / built environment
•Public art, plazas, and walkways
•Mobility / Walkability / bike-ability / transit
•Technological infrastructure
•Housing options
•Office
•Professional services
•Traffic Flow
•Parking Infrastructure
•Safety
Business Owners / Commercial Property Owners / Investors / Developers More likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… Less likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… •All new development types
•Streetscape / design / built environment
•Public art, plazas, and walkways
•Signage / wayfinding / lighting
•Technological infrastructure
•Mobility / Walkability / bike-ability / transit
•Traffic flow
7.a
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 172
KEY THEMES FROM SURVEY RESPONSES
Which retail stores do you visit that
are not available in the City of
Pacifica?
What other business districts
do you like to visit in other
cities, and what makes them
desirable?
What are the most important priorities &
opportunities the City should focus on to
improve / revitalize Pacifica business districts?
Big Box: Target, Costco, Home Depot
Essentials: Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods,
Sprouts, Lunardi’s, Mollie Stones
Restaurants, high-end dining, pet stores,
coffee shops, bars, personal services,
medical services, entertainment
Burlingame, San Mateo, Half Moon
Bay, Millbrae, Serramonte,
Redwood City, San Francisco, Palo
Alto, San Carlos
Key words: variety, downtown,
walkable, bike connectivity,
outdoor dining, interesting,
pleasant, ambiance, hang-out vibe,
personality
Adding a variety of unique restaurants / shops /
hotels; events, activities, entertainment
More public spaces, walkability & bike-ability
Managing traffic and parking
Build off natural beauty, beaches
Need attractive area - improve cleanliness, signage,
facades
Streamline permitting process
7.a
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 173
QUOTES FROM SURVEY RESPONSES
Congruent design with the beach cottage theme to tie
Rockaway in with the rest of Pacifica. Trees! Trees!
We should focus on smart growth and
improving quality of life
Small, Coastal Town Feel
Beautification of buildings and streetscapes,
adding trees and places to sit, play and have
community activities outdoors
Activities - music/entertainment for public outdoor
Focus on Pacifica's natural beauty and potential for
engagement in outdoor activities
WALKABLE, WALKABLE, WALKABLE - easy access for
visitors to stroll, eat, enjoy the natural views and scenery Play up the uniqueness of each area of Pacifica
Outdoor dining has been a good addition - More of That! Revitalize signs and paint
Improve the safety and beautification of the pier
7.a
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 174
DISCLAIMER
The analyses, projections, assumptions, rates of return, and any examples presented herein are for illustrative purposes and are not a guarantee of actual and/or future results. Project analyses are projections only. Actual results may differ from those expressed in this analysis, as results are difficult to predict as a function of market conditions, natural disasters, pandemics, significant economic impacts, legislation and administrative actions.
7.a
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Kosmont - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study - February List of Economic Opportunities Updated - March 27, 2023 No. Opportunity Description Area Timing Pages
1 Use Business Matters newsletter to promote digital marketing & social media Citywide Short Term 20, 24 2 Promote events in districts (i.e., Sam’s Castle, Sanchez Adobe, Sanchez Art Center) Citywide Short Term 24 3 Survey Pacifica businesses on space needs for future growth & retention (New) Citywide Short Term 24 4 Work with Pacifica businesses on improved signage, facades, trees & landscaping (New) Citywide Short Term 24 5 Explore Infrastructure Financing Options with County - EIFD, CRD, CFD (New) Citywide Short Term 19 6 Staff to act as City ambassadors with property & business owners, get to Yes Citywide Medium Term 24 7 Coordinate regional marketing with Half Moon Bay Citywide Medium Term 24 8 Social events for cannabis customers will bring visitors from Bay Area region Citywide Medium Term 20, 24 9 Install EV charging in shopping districts to attract tourists for lunch or dinner Citywide Medium Term 20, 24 10 RHNA requirement for 1,900 housing units translates into AV and spending Citywide Medium Term 20 11 Work with CalTrans to add Coast Highway signage announcing Business Dist. (Revised) Citywide Medium Term 25, 57 12 Future for retail centers in Pacifica lies in blended use, experiential centers Citywide Long Term 32 13 Capture share of 10,000 daily tourists traveling past/through Pacifica Citywide Long Term 20 14 Linda Mar Surplus Parking - Opp Site - Discuss residential blended use with Kimco Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 98, 99 15 SamTrans Park & Ride Lot - Opp Site - Discussions commercial opps with SamTrans Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 102, 103 16 Community Center Property - Opp Site - Retail, hotel, residential, community uses Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 104, 105 17 Park Mall Parcels - Opp Site - residential, commercial, blended uses, surplus land Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 100, 101 18 Manor Shopping Center signage and facade refurbishment needed Pacific Manor Medium Term 23, 25, 57 19 Meet with Pedro Point businesses to explore visitor serving opportunities (New) Pedro Point Short Term 86 20 Provide hotels with monthly Pacifica Anchor and Coastside magazines Rockaway Short Term 20, 24 21 Promote new hotels to attract visitors Rockaway Short Term 20 22 Work with ownership to upgrade Lighthouse Hotel Facility Rockaway Medium Term 20, 25 23 E-bicycle rental facility in Rockaway, draw for visitors Rockaway Medium Term 22, 24 24 Quarry Site - Opp Site - Specific Plan to explore uses - visitor serving & residential Rockaway Long Term 20, 25, 70, 94, 95 25 Sea Bowl Site - Opp Site - consider parking for blended use, housing & commercial Rockaway Long Term 25, 96, 97 26 Discuss findings & benefits of Adopted Sharp Park Specific Plan with businesses Sharp Park Short Term 25, 93 27 Process Beach Blvd Site through State Surplus Lands Act process before marketing Sharp Park Short Term 25, 91 28 Beach Blvd - Opportunity Site - hotel, commercial, blended or community uses (Revised) Sharp Park Short Term 24, 63, 90, 91 29 More events on Palmetto Avenue (food trucks) to support business Sharp Park Medium Term 20, 24 30 Work with SF to expand activities & promotion of Sharp Park Golf Course Sharp Park Medium Term 20, 24, 25, 63 31 Consider July 4th Fireworks off Pier - day long events along Palmetto Avenue Sharp Park Medium Term 24 32 Palmetto Ave Parcels - Opportunity Site - suitable for commercial & residential Sharp Park Long Term 92, 93 33 Consider Developing Public Parking Lots to accommodate more visitors Sharp Park Long Term 93 34 Transform Palmetto Avenue in Sharp Park into a Downtown district Sharp Park Long Term 24, 63 New & Revised Items in Bold Red, Timing: Short Term = 1-2 Years, Medium Term = 3-4 Years, Long Term = 5 Years or longer
7.b
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Attachment 2 - List of Economic Opportunities - Updated (5309 : Acceptance of the Ec Opp Economic Opportunities Timing List Updated - March 27, 2023 No. Opportunity Description Area Timing Pages
1 Use Business Matters newsletter to promote digital marketing & social media Citywide Short Term 20, 24 2 Promote events in districts (i.e., Sam’s Castle, Sanchez Adobe, Sanchez Art Center) Citywide Short Term 24 3 Survey Pacifica businesses on space needs for future growth & retention (New) Citywide Short Term 24 4 Work with Pacifica businesses on improved signage, facades, trees & landscaping (New) Citywide Short Term 24 5 Explore Infrastructure Financing Options with County - EIFD, CRD, CFD (New) Citywide Short Term 19 19 Meet with Pedro Point businesses to explore visitor serving opportunities (New) Pedro Point Short Term 86 20 Provide hotels with monthly Pacifica Anchor and Coastside magazines Rockaway Short Term 20, 24 21 Promote new hotels to attract visitors Rockaway Short Term 20 26 Discuss findings & benefits of Adopted Sharp Park Specific Plan with businesses Sharp Park Short Term 25, 93 27 Process Beach Blvd Site through State Surplus Lands Act process before marketing Sharp Park Short Term 25, 91 28 Beach Blvd - Opportunity Site - hotel, commercial, blended or community uses (Revised) Sharp Park Short Term 24, 63, 90, 91 6 Staff to act as City ambassadors with property & business owners, get to Yes Citywide Medium Term 24 7 Coordinate regional marketing with Half Moon Bay Citywide Medium Term 24 8 Social events for cannabis customers will bring visitors from Bay Area region Citywide Medium Term 20, 24 9 Install EV charging in shopping districts to attract tourists for lunch or dinner Citywide Medium Term 20, 24 10 RHNA requirement for 1,900 housing units translates into AV and spending Citywide Medium Term 20 11 Work with CalTrans to add Coast Highway signage announcing Business Dist. (Revised) Citywide Medium Term 25, 57 18 Manor Shopping Center signage and facade refurbishment needed Pacific Manor Medium Term 23, 25, 57 22 Work with ownership to upgrade Lighthouse Hotel Facility Rockaway Medium Term 20, 25 23 E-bicycle rental facility in Rockaway, draw for visitors Rockaway Medium Term 22, 24 29 More events on Palmetto Avenue (food trucks) to support business Sharp Park Medium Term 20, 24 30 Work with SF to expand activities & promotion of Sharp Park Golf Course Sharp Park Medium Term 20, 24, 25, 63 31 Consider July 4th Fireworks off Pier - day long events along Palmetto Avenue Sharp Park Medium Term 24 12 Future for retail centers in Pacifica lies in blended use, experiential centers Citywide Long Term 32 13 Capture share of 10,000 daily tourists traveling past/through Pacifica Citywide Long Term 20 14 Linda Mar Surplus Parking - Opp Site - Discuss residential blended use with Kimco Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 98, 99 15 SamTrans Park & Ride Lot - Opp Site - Discussions commercial opps with SamTrans Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 102, 103 16 Community Center Property - Opp Site - Retail, hotel, residential, community uses Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 104, 105 17 Park Mall Parcels - Opp Site - residential, commercial, blended uses, surplus land Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 100, 101 24 Quarry Site - Opp Site - Specific Plan to explore uses - visitor serving & residential Rockaway Long Term 20, 25, 70, 94, 95 25 Sea Bowl Site - Opp Site - consider parking for blended use, housing & commercial Rockaway Long Term 25, 96, 97 32 Palmetto Ave Parcels - Opportunity Site - suitable for commercial & residential Sharp Park Long Term 92, 93 33 Consider Developing Public Parking Lots to accommodate more visitors Sharp Park Long Term 93 34 Transform Palmetto Avenue in Sharp Park into a Downtown district Sharp Park Long Term 24, 63 New & Revised Items in Bold Red, Timing: Short Term = 1-2 Years, Medium Term = 3-4 Years, Long Term = 5 Years or longer
7.c
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Economic Opportunity Timing List - Updated (5309 : Acceptance of the Ec
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Pacifica Police Department's First Annual RIPA Report
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Receive the Pacifica Police Department's first annual Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) Report.
STAFF CONTACT:
Chris Clements, Police Captain, Acting Chief of Police
650-738-7314
[email protected]
Bill Glasgo, Police Captain
650-738-7314
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On April 25, 2022, staff presented to City Council a Pacifica Police Department Annual Report with information on the newly implemented Racial Identify and Profiling Act (RIPA) requirements. The Pacifica Police Department was required to begin collecting and submitting this data to the California Department of Justice for stops conducted in calendar year 2022, with the first reporting date due in April of 2023.
Background on the Racial Identity and Profiling Act (RIPA) In 2015, Assembly Bill 953 was passed, creating certain data collection and submission responsibilities for California law enforcement agencies. The Bill requires each state and local agency that employs peace officers to annually report to the California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, data on all stops, as defined, conducted by the agency’s peace officers, and require that data to include specified information. The required reporting timeline is based on the size of the law enforcement agency. As is the case with other San Mateo County agencies, the first reporting date to the Department of Justice for the Pacifica Police Department is April 23, 2023, to include data collected for calendar year 2022. Beginning in January 2022, the Pacifica Police Department began reporting to the Department of Justice, well ahead of the legal mandate.
Pacifica Police Department staff spent the majority of 2021 preparing to meet the requirements of RIPA data reporting. This process involved the purchase of upgrades to the Police Department records management system, training of personnel, and extensive testing to assure required data is being captured, processed, and transmitted to the Department of Justice. Final testing of the program was conducted in the final quarter of 2021. This testing involved assuring officers were entering the proper data after each stop, that supervisors were able to view and approve the data entered in the records management system, and Records personnel were able to review data and successfully transmit to the Department of Justice. The final portion of 8 Packet Pg. 335
Pacifica City Council 2
March 27, 2023
the testing was to assure the Department of Justice agreed that the data submitted met the requirements provided by AB 953. While RIPA data collection has increased the workload of staff, particularly Records personnel, the Department has been successful in implementing this important program.
RIPA data is required to be collected by an officer during any stop. “Stop” means (1) any detention by a peace officer of a person; or (2) any peace officer interaction with a person, in which the peace officer conducts a search, including a consensual search, of the person’s body or property in the person’s possession or control. A “detention,” means a seizure of a person by an officer that results from physical restraint, unequivocal verbal commands, or words or conduct by an officer that would result in a reasonable person believing that he or she is not free to leave or otherwise disregard the officer.
The following data is required to be collected on each “stop:” • Perceived age, race, gender, disabilities of the person stopped • Date, time, and location of the stop
• Reason for the stop
• Actions taken during the stop
• Search information
• Evidence found
• Property seized
• Result of the stop
While there are only (8) items listed above, each item has sub-categories that must be addressed by officers. Each stop requires 21-35 questions to be answered, with at a maximum, up to 125 data points for the officer to consider and determine if applicable to report.
Police Department staff currently reports required data to the Department of Justice at least twice a month, well ahead of the April 2023 legal requirement. This also allows staff to identify any errors in the reporting processes, and address small errors before they become larger issues.
The next phase of the Pacifica Police Department RIPA data collection program involved taking raw data reported to the Department of Justice (all categories listed above) and compiling an easy to read and understandable format that can be presented to the community using the Police Department website. Our staff worked in collaboration with several other police agencies in San Mateo County to develop this report format. The data will be posted quarterly, beginning with the data for the second quarter of 2022. Links will be provided on the police department website for the community to view each quarterly report, with an annual report posted at the beginning of the following year. While not required by law, the quarterly posting of RIPA data will serve to increase transparency.
This report includes data for the 2022 calendar year, related to the perceived race and gender of persons stopped, perceived age, and if the officer perceives a disability. The report will also indicate the reason for a stop, actions taken by the officer during a stop, and result of the stop, using the Department of Justice definitions for these actions.
A common question asked about RIPA Data is how it compares to racial demographics from the U.S. Census. However, this is not a simple comparison. In order to make this comparison, it would require all stops conducted to only involve persons residing within Pacifica. It would seem obvious that our officers will not only be contacting Pacifica residents during their shifts, but also interacting with visitors to Pacifica and commuters traveling through the city. Additionally, RIPA reporting requirements do not require officers to obtain addresses from all persons stopped, nor 8 Packet Pg. 336
Pacifica City Council 3
March 27, 2023
would it be legal for an officer to require this information from a person stopped in all instances.
For example, if a person is stopped for a vehicle code violation and the officer elects to verbally warn the person for the violation rather than issue a citation, no address would be collected. The data below reflects the perceived race, as defined by the RIPA definitions, for all stops for 2022.
White: 45%
Black or African American: 7%
Native American: 1%
Asian: 26%
Pacific Islander: 2%
Hispanic or Latino: 26%
Middle Eastern or South Asian: 5%
According to the United States Census website (www.census.gov), the racial demographics related to Pacifica are as follows:
White alone: 58.8%
Black or African American alone: 2.6%
American Indian and Alaska Native alone: 0.9%
Asian alone: 21.3%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: 1.1%
Two or More Races: 10.2%
Hispanic or Latino: 18.6%
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino: 51.6%
Given the above data, while RIPA data collection does not provide a perfect opportunity for analysis, it does provide the opportunity to determine if there are large discrepancies in the Census versus stop data comparisons, as well as significant changing trends as time progresses that could indicate a bias issue. Additionally, this data has proven to be valuable in understanding how the department may be perceived by the community regarding bias-free policing, providing opportunity for continued discussions with department staff related to bias, and as a tool for Police Department Command Staff to identify potential bias issues. It is understood that all persons have biases, and the goal of bias-free law enforcement efforts at the Pacifica Police Department has been to spark self-reflection by officers regarding potential unconscious bias, for officers to be aware of their decisions and what factors are influencing their decisions while serving the community.
A police department cannot be effective without the trust of the community. Staff will continue to seek opportunities to provide effective, innovative training for officers related to de-escalation, bias, and social justice issues. This RIPA report is the first presentation of stop data in this format, and the result of years of work by our staff to comply with requirements under RIPA. It continues to be a work in progress as we strive to use this as another platform to demonstrate transparency and to increase the trust within our community.
RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
Continued staff work in the areas addressed in this report resonate with City Council Goals of Goals of An Engaged Community, Healthy and Compassionate Community, and Maintaining a Safe Community.
FISCAL IMPACT:
8 Packet Pg. 337
Pacifica City Council 4
March 27, 2023
There is no fiscal impact to receiving this report.
ORIGINATED BY:
Police
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Stop Data Yearly Report 2022 DRAFT (PDF)
8 Packet Pg. 338
Pacifica Police Department
RIPA Statistics
1/1/2022-12/31/2022
• Total Stops Made During Period………………………………………………………………………………………..8876 • Stops Resulting from Officer Initiated Activity……………………………………………………………………7157 • Stops Resulting from Calls for Service ……………………………………………………………………………….1719 Reason for Stop
Consensual encounter resulting in search 18
Determine if student violated school policy 0
Investigation to determine if the person is truant 6
Knowledge of outstanding arrest warrant/wanted person 87 Known to be on parole/probation/PRCS/mandatory supervision 34 Possible conduct warranting discipline under Education Code 0 Reasonable suspicion that the person was engaged in criminal activity 1968 Traffic Violation 6896
Actions Taken During Stop
Asked for consent to search person 205
Asked for consent to search property 136
Baton or other impact weapon used 1
Canine bit or held person 1
Canine removed from vehicle or used to search 4
Chemical spray used 0
Curbside detention 260
Electronic control device used 0
Field sobriety test conducted 130
Firearm discharged or used 0
Firearm pointed at person 28
Handcuffed or flex cuffed 414
None 7942
Other physical or vehicle contact 67
Patrol car detention 245
Person photographed 320
Person removed from vehicle by order 220
Person removed from vehicle by physical contact 7
Property was seized 251
Search of person was conducted 660
Search of property was conducted 433
8.a
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Stop Data Yearly Report 2022 DRAFT (5308 : Pacifica Police Department's First Annual RIPA Report)
Pacifica Police Department
RIPA Statistics
1/1/2022-12/31/2022
Result of Stop
Citation for infraction 2563
Contacted parent/legal guardian or other person responsible for the minor 24 Contacted U.S. Department of Homeland Security 0
Custodial arrest pursuant to outstanding warrant 100
Custodial arrest without warrant 250
Field Interview card completed 56
In-Field cite and release 301
No action 1209
Noncriminal transport for caretaking transport 123
Psychiatric Hold 66
Referral to school administrator 0
Referral to school counselor or other support staff 0
Warning (verbal or written) 4654
8.a
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Stop Data Yearly Report 2022 DRAFT (5308 : Pacifica Police Department's First Annual RIPA Report)
Pacifica Police Department
RIPA Statistics
1/1/2022-12/31/2022
“Asian” refers to a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East or Southeast Asia, including for example, Cambodia, China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam, but who does not fall within the definition of “Middle Eastern or South Asian” or “Pacific Islander.” “Black/African American” refers to a person having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa. “Hispanic/Latine(x)” refers to a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race.
“Middle Eastern or South Asian” refers to a person of Arabic, Israeli, Iranian, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan, Nepali, Bhutanese, Maldivian, or Afghan origin.
“Native American” refers to a person having origins in any of the original peoples of North, Central, and South America. “Pacific Islander” refers to a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands, but who does not fall within the definition of “Middle Eastern or South Asian” or “Asian.” (H) “White” refers to a person of Caucasian descent having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe and Eastern Europe. 45%
14%
7%
26%
5%2%1%
Perceived Race
White
Asian
Black/African American
Hispanic/Latino
Middle Eastern or South Asian
Pacifica Islander
Native American
8.a
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Stop Data Yearly Report 2022 DRAFT (5308 : Pacifica Police Department's First Annual RIPA Report)
Pacifica Police Department
RIPA Statistics
1/1/2022-12/31/2022
“Transgender man/boy” means a person who was assigned female at birth but who currently identifies as a man, or boy if the person is a minor.
“Transgender woman/girl” means a person who was assigned male at birth but who currently identifies as a woman, or girl if the person is a minor.
“Gender nonconforming” means a person whose gender-related appearance, behavior, or both, differ from traditional conceptions about how males or females typically look or behave. A person of any gender or gender identity may be gender nonconforming. For this reason, an officer may select “Gender nonconforming” in addition to any of the other gender data values, if applicable. 31%
69%
Perceived Gender
Female
Male
8.a
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Stop Data Yearly Report 2022 DRAFT (5308 : Pacifica Police Department's First Annual RIPA Report)
Pacifica Police Department
RIPA Statistics
1/1/2022-12/31/2022
“Perceived Age of Person Stopped” refers to the officer’s perception of the approximate age of the person stopped. When reporting this data element, the officer shall make his or her determination based on personal observation only. The officer shall not ask the person stopped his or her age or use the age specified on the person’s identification, recognizing that the officer’s observation may not reflect the age specified on the person’s identification. In providing this information, the officer shall input an Arabic numeral (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4) rounded up to the closest whole number.
7%
40%
25%
20%
5%3%
Perceived Age
20-below
21-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
60-above
8.a
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Stop Data Yearly Report 2022 DRAFT (5308 : Pacifica Police Department's First Annual RIPA Report)
Pacifica Police Department
RIPA Statistics
1/1/2022-12/31/2022
“Perceived or Known Disability of Person Stopped” refers to the officer’s perception that the person stopped displayed signs of one or more of the following conditions; the officer’s knowledge that the person stopped has one or more of the following conditions because the person stopped so advised the officer; or the officer’s prior knowledge that the person stopped had one or more of the following conditions. Nothing in this provision alters any existing requirements to comply with reasonable accommodation and anti-discrimination laws with respect to the treatment of people with disabilities. When reporting this data element, the officer shall select all of the following data values that apply:
(A) Deafness or difficulty hearing
(B) Speech impairment or limited use of language
(C) Blind or limited vision
(D) Mental health condition
(E) Intellectual or developmental disability, including dementia (F) Other disability
0%3%
96%
1%
Perceived Disability
Blind
Deaf
Intellectual or Developemental
Mental Health Condition
None
Other Disability
Speech Impairment or limited use Language
8.a
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Stop Data Yearly Report 2022 DRAFT (5308 : Pacifica Police Department's First Annual RIPA Report)
Pacifica Police Department
RIPA Statistics
1/1/2022-12/31/2022
(G) None. If “None” is selected, no other data values can be selected.
8.a
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Stop Data Yearly Report 2022 DRAFT (5308 : Pacifica Police Department's First Annual RIPA Report)
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Process and timeline for review of Commission and Committee Charters RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Discuss and provide direction to the City Manager about the process and timeline for review of Commission and Committee Charters
STAFF CONTACT:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
650-738-7409
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
City Commissions and Committees (C/Cs) serve as advisory bodies to the City Council, with members appointed by the City Council. From time to time as a best practice, the charters which establish the purpose of these advisory bodies should be reviewed and updated to ensure the bodies are fulfilling the purpose that aligns with the Council’s goals and priorities. In spring 2022, the City Council approved a Council Priority for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 workplan to review and consider potential updates to all C/C charters, beginning in spring 2023. In addition, because the City Council is currently undertaking a comprehensive strategic planning process to establish Mission, Vision, and Values statements for the City, and multi-year Goals and Strategies, it is an opportune time to also undertake a review of C/C charters to ensure alignment with the Strategic Plan.
Background
The City’s current C/Cs are (in alphabetical order):
• Beautification Advisory Committee (BAC)
• Economic Development Committee (EDC)
• Emergency Preparedness & Safety Commission (EPSC)
• Library Advisory Committee (LAC)
• Open Space and Parkland Advisory Committee (OSPAC)
• Parks, Beaches, & Recreation Commission (PBR)
• Planning Commission (PC)
In addition, there is a Youth Advisory Board (YAB) that is currently selected and coordinated by staff in the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Department, is not subject to the Brown Act meeting laws, and is focused on planning youth activities and special events. The PBR commission has a designated liaison to the YAB.
In preparation for launching this Council Priority, staff has begun to research and consolidate background information about the formation, purpose, and other relevant details about each C/C. The purpose of this agenda item for the March 27, 2023 City Council meeting is to receive direction from the City Council about the process and timeline for undertaking these C/C charter 9 Packet Pg. 346
Pacifica City Council 2
March 27, 2023
reviews. Specific decisions about each C/C’s charter will occur at the time of Council review of each C/C’s charter in the future and is not intended for discussion at the March 27th meeting.
For background and context for this item, the City Council should keep in mind the following:
• C/Cs are staff-intensive: While intended to provide advice, recommendations, and assistance to the City Council, administering each C/C in accordance with the Brown Act, researching and preparing agenda reports, and conducting periodic recruitments requires dedicated staff resources;
• Governance Role of C/Cs: The Pacifica Municipal Code (PMC) states in Sec. 2-2.101 “The Council shall establish commissions and committees as desired to assist and advise the Council in the conduct of City business.” Further elaboration about C/Cs’ roles to “assist and advise the Council” is described in the C/C Handbook as follows:
Commission/Committee Role
The primary role of City commission and committees is generally to provide advice, recommendations and assistance to the City Council and to promote increased public input and citizen participation in the determination of City policies and program implementation. It would be impractical and too burdensome for the City Council to review and consider all specific issues related to all program areas of the City, so the Council often relies on commission or committees to guide its decision making.
The specific role of City commission and committees is to review and make recommendations to the City Council on matters within their scope of responsibility as defined in the Pacifica Municipal Code and the Resolution which establishes the commission or committee. Commission and committees are basically a citizens' advisory arm of the City Council, focusing their attention on specific programs of the City, although certain commission and committees may take final actions in certain prescribed areas. More importantly, commission and committees serve as a vehicle to provide public input into City programs and policies in order to broaden public involvement and to streamline the amount of City Council review of these matters.
On specific matters referred to it by the City Council, the commission or committee would normally serve as the initial reviewing body of the City...
Questions for Consideration
In order to help guide the Council’s discussion of process and timeline for this undertaking, staff has prepared the following points/questions for consideration and input.
1. How should the Council identify what should be reviewed and potentially changed for each C/C’s charter? The City Council determines what C/Cs are necessary for advisement in the conduct of City business, and each C/C’s scope of responsibility (although certain Planning Commission functions are prescribed in state law).
Councilmembers, in their C/C liaison roles, may have ideas for how a C/C could better fulfill its advisory role. In addition, C/C members themselves may have their own ideas about how to better advise the Council. Therefore, this charter review process will likely need some sort of input and feedback process between each C/C and the City Council.
This could be structured in several ways, each with different timing impacts:
a. C/C discussion > staff analysis > Council direction > staff prep of final documents and Council approval;
b. Staff analysis > Council discussion > C/C discussion > Council direction > staff prep of final documents and Council approval;
c. Council & C/C joint study session discussion > staff analysis > Council direction > staff prep of final documents and Council approval.
9 Packet Pg. 347
Pacifica City Council 3
March 27, 2023
The City Manager is seeking Council input on which process to undertake, or an alternative process identified by the Council. Note that the Council could select a different process for each C/C, catered to each C/C’s current situation. For example, OSPAC has already discussed their recommended charter revisions for Council consideration.
2. Does the Council want to identify a uniform list of charter-related questions/topics for staff analysis and C/C discussion before Council direction? Identifying a uniform list of questions/topics, such as the ones listed below, could help bring structure and limitations to the work to be done.
a. While wholesale revisions to C/C’s purpose are not being requested, what focused suggestions to amend the Council-directed scope of responsibility can be made, particularly to align with the City’s Strategic Plan? b. Does the C/C have the correct number of members, considering quorum and/or recruitment challenges (if any) and representation?
c. Are there other challenges consistently encountered with the C/C’s areas of responsibility?
3. Should this review process include staff work related to updating numerous administrative aspects of the C/C advisory system? There are potential improvements to administering the C/C advisory system that could be studied and implemented concurrent with charter review. Some of these work items would be more staff intensive than others, but also could help achieve better process efficiencies moving forward. These include:
a. Update the C/C Handbook;
b. Revisit the recruitment timelines and term expirations for C/Cs to increase recruitment efficiencies;
c. Revisit the purpose and structure of Council liaisons to C/Cs; d. Address a process and timeline for annual progress reports from C/Cs and annual C/C workplan approvals by Council;
e. Address allowing virtual C/C meetings (dependent on state law, meeting room/technology, etc.);
f. Clarify training expectations and budget for C/C members (e.g., mandatory ethics and Brown Act training, other professional development)
4. Should this review process be phased with one or two C/Cs at a time and, if so, in what order? Alternatively, are there some C/Cs that may only warrant a limited and quicker review, such as a focused review of the number of members and representation? As described in #1 above, reviewing charters for every C/C is likely to be time consuming. Given the many workplan priorities, undertaking these reviews one or two at a time, or limited reviews, may make the most sense. If the Council agrees with this approach, the City Manager recommends the following preliminary schedule:
• By end of June, 2023: OSPAC and LAC charters review. OSPAC has already made a recommendation for Council’s consideration, so could begin with staff analysis and Council discussion about that recommendation. The current Libraries-related Council priority workplan has the LAC reconvening in spring to refocus on new libraries project outreach concurrent with installation of the new library self-service vending machine at the Sanchez Library;
• By end of September, 2023: BAC, EDC, and EPSC charters review; 9 Packet Pg. 348
Pacifica City Council 4
March 27, 2023
• By end of December, 2023: PBR and PC charters review.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The City Council could also consider the following alternatives:
1. Do not undertake a review of C/C charters at this time due to many other high-priority workplans the City currently has underway;
2. Undertake only one or two priority reviews at this time;
3. Undertake only limited and quicker reviews at this time.
RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
The work of Committees and Commissions helps fulfill all City Council goals, therefore reviewing and updating their charters is related to all City Council goals, and is a Council Priority on the FY2022-23 workplan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact related to the recommended action. Subsequent work to research and prepare recommendations for Council consideration in the future for each C/C charter review will require a moderately significant amount of staff and City Attorney’s office resources.
ORIGINATED BY:
City Manager's Office
ATTACHMENT LIST:
9 Packet Pg. 349
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/27/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Midyear Budget Review and Adoption of Resolution to Adjust the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt a resolution authorizing the midyear FY 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget adjustments.
STAFF CONTACT:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
[email protected]
650-738-7409
Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
[email protected]
650-738-7301
BACKGROUND:
The Finance staff has completed a Midyear Budget review and is proposing adjustments to the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget.
The purpose of the midyear budget review is to analyze the year-to-date revenues and expenditures to review assumptions made before the budget cycle and make necessary adjustments to reflect changes in the City's financial conditions. The midyear budget review is also a segue to the next fiscal year's budget development process, as the midyear analysis is used to develop the base budget assumptions for the new year.
On June 27, 2022, the City Council adopted a balanced FY 2022-23 Budget that reflected the Council's priorities and uses of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for the upcoming fiscal year. This FY 2022-23 Midyear Budget report will focus on the following key objectives:
1. Updating City Council on the status of revenues and expenditures within the FY 2022-23 General Fund Revised Budget and requesting total revenue adjustment to the FY 2022- 23 General Fund of $3.4 million or 7%, including accounting for the new Measure Y ½ Transaction & Use Tax revenues that goes into effect April 1, 2023 (Attachment 3) and appropriation increase of $1.8 million or 4% (Attachment 4), including a net of $600,000 expenditures previously approved by the Council throughout the year (Attachment 2).
2. Updating City Council on the status of revenues and expenditures within the FY 2022-23 Non-General Fund Revised Budget and requesting an increase to the FY 2022-23 nongeneral (Other) Funds Revenues totaling $1.2 million or 3% of the Total Other Funds Adopted Budget (Attachment 3). The Other Funds Expenditures adjustments total $3.2 million or 6% (Attachment 4), most of which were the result of the motor pool vehicle replacement project previously approved by the Council (Attachment 2). 10 Packet Pg. 350
Pacifica City Council 2
March 27, 2023
3. Updating Council on the projected fund balance for all City Funds through June 30, 2023 (Attachment 5).
The FY 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget was adopted as a balanced budget, meaning that the City's operating expenditures did not exceed operating revenues.
The FY 2022-23 Revised General Fund budget is $50.7 million in revenue and $49.1 million in total General Fund expenditures.
City-wide revenues from all other non-general funds are projected to increase by $1.2 million (Attachment 3), and citywide expenditures from all other non-general funds are projected to increase by $3.2 million primarily due to the $2 million additional appropriation for the motor pool replacement project previously approved by Council earlier this year and staff’s recommendation to earmark the current year’s Measure Y revenues of $0.65 million towards the Street Resurfacing CIP project.
Staff used the following methodology for the midyear budget analysis: the year-end estimates in operating revenues and expenditures in excess of the adopted budget by 5% and $25,000 in each revenue and expense categories and cost centers were considered material in nature and are being proposed for a budget adjustment.
1. Status of General Fund Revenues and Expenditures in FY 2022-23 Revised Budget FY 2022-23 General Fund Revenues
The General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund and is used to account for most day-today activities. It receives unrestricted revenues and provides the City’s general administrative services, public safety, parks, beaches and recreation, public works, and community development-related activities such as planning, building, and engineering. Revenue sources include but are not limited to property tax, sales tax, and transient occupancy tax (TOT), business tax registration, and current fees and charges for services.
The revised estimates for General Fund revenues (excluding transfers) are projected to be $48.6 million or $3.4 million (7%) higher than the Adopted Budget of $45.2 million mainly due to the City’s increase in the revenue base and one-time revenues related to Vehicle License Fees backfill from the State that were conservatively under-budgeted due to uncertainties about the City receiving these funds this year when the budget was adopted. The revised revenue projections also include adjustments to Sales taxes, Transient Occupancy taxes and Utilities User Taxes, which project to perform strong based on the actual data as of the quarter ending December 31, 2022, and the addition of the new Measure Y ½ cent transaction and use tax that is scheduled to commence on April 1, 2023.
The following table demonstrates General Fund revenues for the FY 2022-23 Actual, FY 2022- 23 Adopted, and Revised FY 2022-23 budget projections.
10 Packet Pg. 351
Pacifica City Council 3
March 27, 2023
Description FY 2021-22
Actual
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
FY 2022-23
Revised
Budget
$ Change
Revised over
Adopted
% Change
Revised
over
Adopted
Taxes $ 28,851,076 $ 31,249,900 $ 34,555,707 $ 3,305,807 11% Property Tax $ 14,500,404 $ 15,181,300 15,554,100 372,800 2% Vehicle License Fees $ 4,355,327 $ 5,922,400 6,986,807 1,064,407 18% Business License Tax $ 460,964 $ 516,600 453,000 (63,600) -12% Cannabis Tax $ 839,527 $ 825,000 825,000 - -
Sales Tax $ 3,136,434 $ 3,111,200 4,006,000 894,800 29% Transient Occupancy Tax $ 1,492,502 $ 2,100,000 2,643,000 543,000 26% Utility Users Tax $ 2,265,330 $ 1,905,600 2,400,000 494,400 26% Other Taxes $ 1,800,589 $ 1,687,800 1,687,800 - -
Intergovernmental $ 6,394,725 $ 5,365,212 5,262,512 (102,700) -2% Other Revenue $ - $ 88,000 88,000 - -
Charges for Services $ 6,184,825 $ 8,542,251 8,741,251 199,000 2% Sub-total $ 41,430,626 $ 45,245,363 48,647,470 3,402,107 8% Transfers In $ 2,150,898 $ 2,029,900 2,029,900 - -
Total $ 43,581,524 $ 47,275,263 50,677,370 $ 3,402,107 7% FY 2022-23 General Fund Revenues Adjustments for Council Approval The following revenues are projected to reflect material changes over the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget and recommended for budget adjustment:
• Property Tax is the City’s largest revenue source. Based on the first 50% remittance received in December 2022, the revenues are projected to increase 8% from last year primarily due to increase in property transfer taxes, while the adopted budget assumption was a 6% growth. Staff recommends increasing the property tax revenue by an additional 2% or $372,800.
• Vehicle License Fee was converted to a property tax source by state legislation and grows as property tax grows in the City. The County of San Mateo remits the VLF related property tax twice a year in equal amounts. For FY 2019-20, the State began diverting a portion of the City’s VLF with a plan to backfill the amount in two years (FY 2021-22). This diversion has continued for three years, and the State slowly began to pay the funds back with a two-year lag time. At the time of preparing the adopted FY 2022-23 year, it was still uncertain if the state would backfill the total owned obligations for FY 2020-21, so staff recommended budgeting half of the anticipated amount. After the Budget was adopted, the State announced that the full amount of the FY 2020-21 backfill was going to be funded this year. Therefore, a midyear adjustment of $1,064,407 is recommended. Looking forward, staff has been informed the State will not be continuing to backfill the total VLF obligations moving forward based on the Governor’s proposed budget release in January 2023, which will result in an approximately $0.7 million shortfall in this revenue category in the next year’s budget. • Business License Tax shows a decrease of $63,600 or 12%, based on the actual revenue collection in the first half of this fiscal year. The budget projections were overly optimistic and assumed completion of the compliance efforts in all business categories this fiscal year which became a much more complicated and longer process. After consulting with HdL, the City’s tax consultant, most of the compliance work will continue throughout the next fiscal year. About 90% of the revenue are collected prior to midyear.
The revised amount of $453,000 is consistent with what was collected last year. • Sales Tax is the City’s second-largest revenue source. Staff is proposing an increase of 10 Packet Pg. 352
Pacifica City Council 4
March 27, 2023
$244,800 or 8% over the Adopted budget based on current year activity and revised projections from HdL, the City’s sales tax advisor. The local sales tax is showing an increase in the Restaurant and Hotel as well as the Fuel and Service Station industry categories due to increases in post COVID travel and gas prices and activity level. In addition, the sales tax category projections include the new Measure Y ½ cent transaction and use tax of $650,000 (3-month estimate) that will begin to be collected on April 1, 2023. In total, the sales tax category is proposed to increase $894,800 or 29%. • Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). The hospitality industry was affected the most by the pandemic. National and international tourism took the hardest hit, which negatively impacted the City’s hotel occupancy and TOT revenues. These revenues are showing a substantial increase compared to the prior year. This positive trend is a result of multiple factors, including the post-COVID recovery of the hotel industry, increased nightly rates, and the opening of the 88-room Fairfield by Marriott Inn & Suites hotel in spring of last year. The increase is also attributable to recent efforts by HdL, the City’s tax consultant, in identifying short-term rentals (STR) and bringing them into compliance. The revised FY 2022-23 TOT revenues are projected at $2.6 million, showing an additional $543,000 or 26% increase over the Adopted Budget. Approximately $1.2 million or approximately 47% of the total TOT amount comes from STRs.
• Utility Users Tax was budgeted at $1.9 million and projects an increase of $494,400, or 26% to $2.4 million. The increase is based on current year-to-date activity through December 2022 increasing by 27% compared to the same period last year, which is a result of significant increases in gas and electric rates. • Charges for Services project a marginal increase of $199,000 or 2% mainly due to an increase in building and electrical permit activity.
FY 2022-23 General Fund Expenditures
Expenditure projections were reviewed based on three categories: personnel costs and general government program budget in contract services, materials & supply categories as listed below.
Expenditures FY 2021-22
Actual
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
FY 2022-23
Revised
Budget
$ Change
Revised over
Adopted
% Change
Revised
over
Adopted
Salaries & Benefits $ 27,161,805 $ 30,728,643 $ 30,487,053 $ (241,590) -1% Contract Services 7,243,504 9,689,494 10,993,084 1,303,590 13% Material/Supplies/Maintenance 3,676,751 3,753,709 3,850,709 97,000 3% Sub-Total 38,082,061 44,171,846 45,330,846 1,159,000 3% Transfers/Allocations Out 5,105,875 3,100,381 3,750,381 650,000 21% Total $ 43,187,936 $ 47,272,227 $ 49,081,227 $ 1,809,000 4% Previously Approved Changes to the FY 2022-23 Budget
At every Council meeting, staff brings agenda items for the Council's consideration and approval. Some of these items require amendments to the original budget. During the midyear budget review process, Finance staff incorporated all previously approved budget amendments year-to-date into the FY 2022-23 Revised Budget. These adjustments increased the General Fund appropriation by $600,000, as further described in Attachment 2.
Staff Adjustments to Budget
10 Packet Pg. 353
Pacifica City Council 5
March 27, 2023
During the midyear budget review process, staff makes a number of minor cleanup changes and adjustments within the department's budgets. Money is moved from various individual lineitems with savings to other line items within a department budget. This is done when a line item may go over its original budget amount. These changes are considered routine as they have minimal effects on the overall budget and remain within the FY 2022-23 Council approved funding level. Again, only the year-end estimates in expenditures categories in excess of the adopted budget by 5% and $25,000 in each cost center are being proposed for a budget adjustment as listed below.
FY 2022-23 General Fund Operating Expenditures Adjustments for Council Approval Salaries and Benefits and Position Control
Personnel cost projections are based on the most current payroll cost and projected for the remainder of the fiscal year after factoring in expected personnel changes. Over the past two years, the City has been hampered by a high vacancy rate and challenges in recruiting and retaining talent. These challenges are currently widespread in the local government sector, especially in highly competitive and costly labor markets like the Bay Area. Some recruitments had to be repeated multiple times without success. Because of these trends, staff is projecting a substantial salary savings of nearly $2.5 million created by ongoing high vacancy rates and in some cases new employees coming in at a lower salary step than the incumbents. However, staff does not recommend reducing the personnel budget due to salary savings, as this could be a misleading representation of personnel cost. Plus, salary savings may help offset any unexpected increases before the end of the year, while any unused savings would revert to the General Fund balance at the end of the fiscal year close.
However, staff is reporting this figure here as it provides necessary background in understanding the City’s ongoing staffing challenges as a number of projects budgeted for this year have not started yet and will have to be rolled into the new year.
Position Control Changes
As part of the mid-year budget review staff is requesting the following adjustments to the current FY 2022-23 position control:
1. Remove the “limited-term” designation from the Management Analyst position in the City Manager’s Office that provides critical support for economic development and sustainability programs that have no other designated staff resources. Approving this recommendation will be a proactive measure to continue staffing these essential programs and will also help with keeping desired talent within the organization.
2. Reallocate funds from Salaries and Benefits to the Contractual Services category in Public Works and Finance Departments as following:
a. Convert the ARPA-funded Sr. Accountant position to contractual services in the Finance Department. This temporary two-year term position was added to the FY 2022-23 Budget to assist the City with implementation of the new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. The City was not able to fill this position due to the above-mentioned on-going recruitment challenges and the unique skillset requirement in both municipal accounting and systems implementations. Staff recommends reallocating the full budget of $179,590 from Salaries and Benefits into the Contractual Services category to fund this work through a professional services contract.
10 Packet Pg. 354
Pacifica City Council 6
March 27, 2023
b. Convert the ARPA-funded Project Manager position to contractual services category in the Public Works Department. The City successfully filled a limitedterm Project Manager position to manage the Civic Center remodel project.
However, the incumbent has recently accepted a permanent position with another City. In order to avoid service interruption and increase in Civic Center project cost, staff recommends reallocating the remaining budget for this position ($62K) into the Contractual Services category to continue with the Project Management scope through a professional services contract.
There is no budget impact for the position control related items above as this cost is already included in the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget and no additional appropriation is requested at this time. Staff is presenting these changes for Council’s approval now as a matter of position control, in preparation for the new budget to carry-over these changes into the FY2023-24 Base Budget development process.
Contract Services
• Grant Funding Services - Additional allocation of $60,000 in the City Manager’s department budget is being proposed to continue funding grant writing services. • Legal Services - Additional allocation of $0.6 million is needed to increase the City Attorney’s general services from the original budget of $1.3 million to the revised budget amount of $1.9 million. This increase is partially due to a large one-time unbudgeted settlement agreement that was included in legal cost and is also based on the current cost trends and anticipated increase in legal expenses related to labor negotiations in the second half of the fiscal year.
Material, Supplies and Maintenance Services
• Police Department Network Equipment Upgrade - Additional allocation of $72,000 in IT Department budget to cover failing network equipment that serves the Police Department. The core network switches and firewalls in the Police Department are approaching end of useful life and some equipment is starting to fail, causing network disruptions. The request will cover one-time cost of replacing 8 network switches and 2 firewalls
· Computer Software - Additional allocation in the City Manager Department to continue funding the ongoing software system for the public information requests in the amount of $25,000 unintentionally omitted in the budget.
· General Liability and Property Insurance Premium - Increase in appropriation by $462,000 due to significant increase in the insurance cost (approx. 40%) that was unknown when the budget was developed. Based on recent conversations with PLAN JPA, the City’s insurance carrier, the insurance market in post-COVID environment has been very unstable, and we should anticipate another increase of 20-25% in property insurance rates for the upcoming budget.
Transfers/Allocations Out
· Additional Allocation towards the Pavement Resurfacing CIP - Transfers Out the projected FY 2022-23 Measure Y revenues of $650,000 from the General Fund to the Street Construction Fund (09) to provide additional funding for the Pavement 10 Packet Pg. 355
Pacifica City Council 7
March 27, 2023
Resurfacing Project (CIP #0318). This allocation will be programed into the future resurfacing work plan that may include streets that are currently not included in the City’s five-year pavement plan. Public Works department will return to Council at a later day with the proposed priority work plan.
Overall, FY 2022-23 General Fund operating expenditures are amended to net $1.2 million or 3%, which includes an operating increase of $1.2 million, including $600,000 of previously approved Council adjustments throughout the year (Attachment 2) and $650,000 in transfers out to the Street Construction Fund as described above.
2. Status of Non-General Fund Revenues and Expenditures in FY 2022-23 Revised Budget
Non-General Funds include the following categories.
· Enterprise Funds, including Sewer Operating and Capital and Beach Parking funds • Special Revenue and Capital Funds, including Gas Tax and Street funds, Drainage, General Capital, Housing and Park in lieu funds, PB&R Roy Davies Trust fund, Disaster Accounting and others.
· Internal Service Funds, including Motor Pool Operating and Replacement funds, Dental Benefit fund and Risk Management (Workers' Comp and General Liability) funds. · Debt Service Fund
Non-General Fund FY 2022-23 Revenues and Transfers In
In the Adopted FY 2022-23 Budget, these revenues comprise $44.5 million or 48.5% of the City's $91.7 million total revenue budget. The non-general fund revenues are projected to increase by net of $1.2 million to $45.7 million as listed in Attachment 3 and proposed midyear adjustments as listed below. The figure above includes the revenue increase of $575,000 previously approved by Council as detailed in Attachment 2 and $650,000 transfers in of the Measure Y revenues into the Street Construction Fund.
FY 2022-23 Non-General Fund Revenues Adjustments for Council Approval The following non-General Fund revenues are projected to reflect material changes over the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget and recommended for budget adjustment:
Special Revenue and Capital Funds:
• Street Construction Fund (Fund 09) revenues are proposed to be increased by $650,000 as a transfer in of the projected FY 2022-23 Measure Y revenues from the General Fund to the Street Construction Fund to be used for the expansion of the Pavement Resurfacing Project (CIP #0318).
Additional information on individual non-general fund revenue categories is presented in Attachment 3.
FY 2022-23 Non-General Fund FY 2022-23 Expenditures and Transfers Out Adjustments for Council Consideration
10 Packet Pg. 356
Pacifica City Council 8
March 27, 2023
Non-General Fund FY 2022-23 Adopted expenditures comprise $52.8 million, or 52.8% of the City's $100.1 million total expenditure budget. These expenditures are proposed to be amended by the net of $3.2 million or 6%, which was mostly previously approved by the City Council yearto-date ($2.6 million) as listed in Attachment 2. • Street Construction Fund (Fund 09) - Measure Y 1/2c transaction and use tax revenue will begin to be collected in General Fund on April 1, 2023. Although the City will not receive these revenues until the very end of the fiscal year, staff anticipates $650,000 will be collected and accrued in FY 2022-23. Staff is proposing to earmark these funds for the expansion of the Pavement Resurfacing Project (CIP #0318) as further explained above.
• General Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 22) - Reallocation of the Capital funding from San Pedro Creek Bank Stabilization CIP project to a new San Pedro Creek Storm Repair project in the Public Works department in the amount of $180,000 with a net zero effect on the FY 2022-23 CIP budget. The large storm event on December 31, 2022, caused a portion of the asphalt pathway along San Pedro Creek at the NE corner of the Pedro Point Shopping Center to fail along with a portion of the creek bank. It is important to begin repairs on the project immediately in order to be eligible for possible reimbursement funding from FEMA. Staff is proposing using the $180k currently allocated to the San Pedro Bank Stabilization Project (0320) for this work. In reviewing project #0320, there is no new erosion that has occurred within this area; therefore, it is staff’s recommendation to delay this work to a later date and use the allocated funds for the newly proposed project.
Capital expenditures will be further reviewed by staff during the FY 2023-24 CIP Budget development process that is now being prepared by Public Works department.
3. Projected Fund Balance Structure
The FY 2022-23 revised budget amounts have been updated from the adopted budget figures following the independent audit of FY 2022-23. Under GASB 54, this balance is made up of the following components: non-spendable items or portions of fund balance that cannot be liquidated, restricted amounts for use by outside agencies, committed amounts by Council action such as emergency/contingency reserves and assigned balances to pay off unfunded liabilities and to fund infrastructure improvements.
These restricted reserves and operating contingency are at $10.9 million leaving an unassigned projected balance of $7.7 million, which equates to 15.8% of the General Fund operating expenditures (excluding one-time and capital transfers). This is an increase of nearly $1.4 million or 2.4% from the Adopted Budget (adjusted by the beginning fund balance), which complies with the Government Finance Officers Association of the US and Canada (GFOA) recommendation for government entities of meeting at least two months of operating revenues or expenditures before considering any additional assigned reserves previously set-aside by Council policy as listed in the table below.
Although a further increase in the General Fund unassigned fund balance would be desirable, this is certainly a move in the right direction that puts the City in a slightly better financial position to face budget choices in the upcoming years.
10 Packet Pg. 357
Pacifica City Council 9
March 27, 2023
Designations Actual
2021-22
Adopted
2022-23
Revised
2022-23
(Midyear)
Variance
Revised vs.
Adopted
Beginning Fund Balance $ 15,846,029 $ 16,292,225 $ 16,292,225 $ - Total Revenue* 43,581,524 47,275,263 50,677,370 3,402,107 Total Operating Expenditures 43,187,936 46,617,227 48,426,227 1,809,000 Total Capital Project Expenditures 655,000 655,000 -
Ending Fund Balance 16,292,225 16,950,261 18,543,368 1,593,107 Non-Spendable 3,768,557 4,848,527 4,848,527 -
Restricted 342,510 350,000 350,000
Assigned Reserves
Policy Level of 10% of Expenditures 3,810,040 4,661,723 4,842,623 180,900 Facility Maintenance & Replacement * 205,000 55,000 55,000 - Compensated Absences 200,000 200,000 200,000 -
Child Care Reserve* 488,591 488,591 488,591 -
Legal Reserves 100,000 100,000 100,000 -
Assigned Reserves 4,803,631 5,505,314 5,686,214 180,900 Total Designations 8,914,698 10,703,841 10,884,741 180,900 Unassigned Fund Balance 7,377,527 6,246,420 7,658,627 1,412,207 Operating Expenses 43,187,936 46,617,227 48,426,227 1,809,000 Unassigned Fund Balance as % of Op. Expenses 17% 13.4% 15.8% 2.4% The overall impact of the midyear budget review on the General Fund is positive and projects an additional $1.4 million in unassigned General Fund Balance. This results from a better than expected performance at the FY 2021-22 year-end, which increased the unassigned Actual audited FY 2021-22 General Fund balance by approximately $0.9 million to $7.4 million compared to the FY 2021-22 projected figure of $6.5 million used for the Budget.
Another major contributing factor is prudent fiscal management by the City Council and demonstrated financial discipline by the City Manager and all City Departments in keeping their operations within their limited budget means. This projected General Fund balance will be used as a starting point in preparation for the new budget and City Council discussion of strategic goals and priorities for the upcoming budget cycle.
Should the Council approve all midyear budget recommendations listed above, the estimated ending unassigned General Fund balance as of June 30, 2023, is projected to be approximately $7.7 million, or 15.8% of the Operating expenditure, which is $1.4 million higher than the projected $6.2 million balance or 13.4% reported at Budget Adoption.