Pacifica City Council
December 2, 2025

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx

INTRODUCTION
The 570 Crespi Drive residential project islocated along the south side of Crespi Drive, east of Highway 1 in the City of Pacifica, California. The project consists of the construction of 3 separate buildings containing 15 residential units and 3,165 s.f. of commercial space. Figure 1 shows the project site plan. Figure 2 shows an aerial photo of the project site.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON NOISE
Fundamentals of Acoustics
Acoustics is the science of sound. Sound may be thought of as mechanical energy of a vibrating object transmitted by pressure wavesthrough a medium to human (or animal) ears. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), then they can be heard and are called sound.

The number of pressure variations per second is called the frequency of sound, and is expressed as cycles per second or Hertz (Hz).

Noise is a subjective reaction to different types of sounds. Noise is typically defined as (airborne) sound that is loud, unpleasant, unexpected or undesired, and may therefore be classified as a more specific group of sounds. Perceptions of sound and noise are highly subjective from person to person. Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a very large and awkward range of numbers. To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale uses the hearing threshold (20 micropascals), as a point of reference, defined as 0 dB. Other sound pressures are then compared to this reference pressure, and the logarithm is taken to keep the numbers in a practical range. The decibelscale allows a millionͲfold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB, and changesin levels (dB) correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness.

The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable, and can be approximated by AͲweighted sound levels. There is a strong correlation between AͲweighted sound levels (expressed as dBA) and the way the human ear perceives sound. For this reason, the AͲweighted sound level has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment.


1.b
Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive
City of Pacifica, CaliforniaFigure 1Project Site Plan
--\
\
I
\
--
---
___
...
-
,._
I .

J ~ \_,,=
1l
---1 - 892.79Sf :;_.
y- -1 +- - !2 - ~ - - !! 1--~ li!I l&
1969SF 111 l2SF
L - ---1
,.,
1200SF
l 12~$~ ~ 2~5F : 12~5F1 204Sf:
~
v "
',,;.,.
,_ ) / ----~-5'\J -:...:;i...,AB~~7---_-_-_-__ - .. -.~,,. MS• ;r~!• ("- - NOie clr--a ... -4-:,..-,o,--4-:f---,l!l--'~:/t--jQ--11=:it--1u-T"' ::t;l~;;~;;;;;;;~~t~--1 ·:: \ ll ( IJSA6lE0PEN SPACf & l AN0SCAPE / _..,...\- 31252SF
I"-. COVER1'GE CALCULAIIONS 00 NOi / • I 1
\ INCLUDE ANY LOT AREA WITHIN VACANT' I I
1 UNDEVELOf'EO AREA. I
'
--LID-- Cl".I--Ll!]~--(t]I-..Ll~-''.itll-,--'.'.ltl-~=ll:ll-,-4]1 t\ I I ~u..1-,1-l,__,j.l,,~~....,__~~ i •, I
I .ll---+--+~~~-,i-J.,~-4-'-r--~ ~k-c..------1--,~ ~--.--,c.-~.-L.----.--'--' '---------'------'- •' I \
1 Sii. Plan 18 78 SF 12.91 SF 12 SF 12 38 SF 12.38 SF 12 30 SF 12 38 SF 12.38 SF 12 30 SF •35.35 SF \ 1·•20"-0"
____ ,
'I\ \ .!l2
_
- - - - - \ Usable Open Space 11rea- PdVPJe 0oen Sooce Neo -=• 0oen Spgce Landscape Cove,aqe - ,.,.. - •- - -
1 I 11 [(X)dK;QQC COYNQQO I s:rxt:JC901t COYCS:000
\ Unit tbnlt Ar«I Unit Name A1ec1 69 S0OISF 3S •.G5Sf
=-:~c:·~~c:::~•for OoenSOoc:e l.NIC6 IAlOONf 2•2JJHf ThelondscQPedO'eocolCUIOtlon ,o :;:: : ~:::~ 1eq.;,remenlolo!a~~mnm.,mdirnen11011. Ufffl 4 I S,.LC()t,IY 3'i00$f 1.,t,111(;6 IIOOfDEO: ?~I0Sf lnr-lllt't..~ttw,,nlnnPrtnu>ncnllhP rtir1P 11 r -? nPvPlnnmPnt RPrn 1irPmP nlt;• ( ( SAXELBY A~.9,~~IJ,~.~

1.b
Packet Pg. 699
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive
City of Pacifica, CaliforniaFigure 2Noise Measurement Sites egen
Noise Measurement - Long Term Noise Measurement - Short Term 0 ft 250 ft 500 ft 750 ft 1000 ft 1250 ft 1500 ft
Proj ection: State Plane (California Zone 3) / NAD83 / meters Rev. Date: 04/13/2020
~ XELBY
~~
.9,~~Il~
.~

1.b
Packet Pg. 700
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx The decibel scale is logarithmic, not linear. In other words, two sound levels 10ͲdB apart differ in acoustic energy by a factor of 10. When the standard logarithmic decibel is AͲweighted, an increase of 10ͲdBA is generally perceived as a doubling in loudness. For example, a 70ͲdBA sound is half asloud as an 80ͲdBA sound, and twice as loud as a 60 dBA sound. Community noise is commonly described in terms of the ambient noise level, which is defined as the allͲencompassing noise level associated with a given environment. A common statistical tool is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq), which corresponds to a steadyͲstate A weighted sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given time period (usually one hour).

The Leq is the foundation of the composite noise descriptor, Ldn, and shows very good correlation with community response to noise.
The day/night average level (DNL or Ldn) is based upon the average noise level over a 24Ͳhour day, with a +10Ͳdecibel weighing applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. The nighttime penalty is based upon the assumption that people react to nighttime noise exposures as though they were twice as loud as daytime exposures. Because Ldn represents a 24Ͳhour average, it tends to disguise shortͲterm variations in the noise environment.

Table 1 lists several examples of the noise levels associated with common situations. Appendix A provides a summary of acoustical terms used in this report.

TABLE 1: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS
Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities  ͲͲ110ͲͲ Rock Band
Jet FlyͲover at 300 m (1,000 ft.) ͲͲ100ͲͲ
Gas Lawn Mower at 1 m (3 ft.) ͲͲ90ͲͲ 
Diesel Truck at 15 m (50 ft.),
at 80 km/hr. (50 mph) ͲͲ80ͲͲ Food Blender at 1 m (3 ft.)Garbage Disposal at 1 m (3 ft.) Noisy Urban Area, Daytime
Gas Lawn Mower, 30 m (100 ft.) ͲͲ70ͲͲ Vacuum Cleaner at 3 m (10 ft.) Commercial Area
Heavy Traffic at 90 m (300 ft.) ͲͲ60ͲͲ Normal Speech at 1 m (3 ft.) Quiet Urban Daytime ͲͲ50ͲͲ Large Business Office
Dishwasher in Next Room
Quiet Urban Nighttime ͲͲ40ͲͲ Theater, Large Conference Room (Background) Quiet Suburban Nighttime ͲͲ30ͲͲ Library
Quiet Rural Nighttime ͲͲ20ͲͲ Bedroom at Night, Concert Hall (Background)  ͲͲ10ͲͲ Broadcast/Recording Studio
Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing ͲͲ0ͲͲ Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing Source: Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement, Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. September, 2013.

I
I
I
I I
\
\
\...,...._
......
'-.....,
·,,"... ',,,
~-------

1.b
Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx Effects of Noise on People
The effects of noise on people can be placed in three categories:
x Subjective effects of annoyance, nuisance, and dissatisfaction x Interference with activities such as speech, sleep, and learning x Physiological effects such as hearing loss or sudden startling Environmental noise typically produces effects in the first two categories. Workers in industrial plants can experience noise in the last category. There is no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise or the corresponding reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. A wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance exists and different tolerances to noise tend to develop based on an individual’s past experiences with noise.

Thus, an important way of predicting a human reaction to a new noise environment is the way it compares to the existing environment to which one has adapted: the soͲcalled ambient noise level.

In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise will be judged by those hearing it. With regard to increases in AͲweighted noise level, the following relationships occur:
x Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1ͲdBA cannot be perceived; x Outside of the laboratory, a 3ͲdBA change is considered a justͲperceivable difference; x A change in level of at least 5ͲdBA is required before any noticeable change in human response would be expected; and
x A 10ͲdBA change is subjectively heard as approximately a doubling in loudness, and can cause an adverse response.

Stationary point sources of noise – including stationary mobile sources such as idling vehicles – attenuate (lessen) at a rate of approximately 6ͲdB per doubling of distance from the source, depending on environmental conditions (i.e. atmospheric conditions and either vegetative or manufactured noise barriers, etc.). Widely distributed noises, such as a large industrial facility spread over many acres, or a street with moving vehicles, would typically attenuate at a lower rate.

1.b
Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx

EXISTING NOISE AND VIBRATION ENVIRONMENTS

EXISTING NOISE RECEPTORS
Some land uses are considered more sensitive to noise than others. Land uses often associated with sensitive receptors generally include residences, schools, libraries, hospitals, and passive recreational areas. Sensitive noise receptors may also include threatened or endangered noise sensitive biological species, although many jurisdictions have not adopted noise standards for wildlife areas. Noise sensitive land uses are typically given special attention in order to achieve protection from excessive noise.

Sensitivity is a function of noise exposure (in terms of both exposure duration and insulation from noise) and the types of activities involved. In the vicinity of the projectsite, sensitive land uses include existing singleͲfamily residential useslocated towardsthe southwest and multiͲfamily residential uses located to the north and northeast.
EXISTING GENERAL AMBIENT NOISE LEVELs
The existing noise environment in the project area is primarily defined by traffic on Highway 1 and Crespi Drive.

To quantify the existing ambient noise environment in the project vicinity, Saxelby Acoustics conducted continuous (24Ͳhr.) noise level measurements at one location on the project site and short term measurements at 2 locations in the project vicinity. Noise measurement locations are shown on Figure 2. A summary of the noise level measurement survey results is provided in Table 2. Appendix B contains the complete results of the noise monitoring.

The sound level meters were programmed to record the maximum, median, and average noise levels at each site during the survey. The maximum value, denoted Lmax, represents the highest noise level measured. The average value, denoted Leq, represents the energy average of all the noise received by the sound level meter microphone during the monitoring period. The median value, denoted L50, represents the sound level exceeded 50 percent of the time during the monitoring period. Larson Davis Laboratories (LDL) model 820 and 831 precision integrating sound level meters were used for the ambient noise level measurement survey. The meters were calibrated before and after use with a B&K Model 4230 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy of the measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4).


1.b
Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF EXISTING BACKGROUND NOISE MEASUREMENT DATA Site Date
Average Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
CNEL/Ldn
Daytime
(7:00 amͲ10:00 pm)
Nighttime
(10:00 pm – 7:00 am)
Leq L50 Lmax Leq L50 Lmax
LTͲ1 04/09/20Ͳ04/10/20 58 54 51 73 51 45 67
STͲ1 04/09/20Ͳ1:05 p.m. N/A 55 44 93 N/A N/A N/A
STͲ2 04/10/20Ͳ1:21 p.m. N/A 48 47 58 N/A N/A N/A
Source: Saxelby Acoustics – 2020

EVALUATION OF TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES ON THE PROJECT SITE ONͲSITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE PREDICTION METHODOLOGY
Saxelby Acoustics used the SoundPLAN noise model to calculate traffic noise levels at the proposed residential uses due to traffic on Crespi Drive and Highway 1. The proposed project buildings and surrounding structures were input into the SoundPLAN model to determine the traffic noise exposure on the project site. Future (2041) traffic noise levels were calculated by assuming a 1% per year increase in traffic volumes on Highway 1 and Crespi Drive.The results of this analysis are shown on Figure 3.Based upon the SoundPLAN noise model, Table 3 shows the maximum predicted traffic noise levels at the residential floors of the projects closest to Crespi Drive. 
--- ~--

1.b
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive
City of Pacifica, CaliforniaFigure 3
Project Noise Contours (dBA Ldn)
1st Floor: 64 dBA
2nd Floor: 64 dBA
3rd Floor: 64 dBA
1st Floor: 64 dBA
2nd Floor: 64 dBA
3rd Floor: 63 dBA 1st Floor: 55 dBA
2nd Floor: 56 dBA
3rd Floor: 58 dBA
1st Floor: 52 dBA
2nd Floor: 53 dBA
3rd Floor: 55 dBA
Signs and symbols
Levels in dB(A)
<= 60
60 - 61 61 - 62
62 - 63 63 - 64 64 - 65
> 65
J 4.:i !:I 18 27 36
m
If SAXELBY (\.._\ACOUSTICS Acoustics • Noise • Vibration

1.b
Packet Pg. 705
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx TABLE 3: TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS AT PROJECT FACADES
Location Exterior Noise
Level, Ldn
Estimated Interior
Noise Level, Ldn1
Building AͲNorthwest 63.6 dBA 38.6 dBA
Building AͲNortheast 63.2 dBA 38.2 dBA
Multifamily West 58.4 dBA 33.4 dBA
Multifamily East 54.9 dBA 29.9 dBA
1 Assumes typical 25 dBA exteriorͲtoͲinterior noise level reduction.

FUTURE TRAFFIC NOISE ENVIRONMENT AT OFFͲSITE RECEPTORS
OFFͲSITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
To assess noise impacts due to projectͲrelated traffic increases on the local roadway network, traffic noise levels are predicted at sensitive receptors for existing and future, project and noͲproject conditions.
Existing, Background, and Cumulative noise levels due to traffic are calculated using the Federal Highway Administration Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA RDͲ77Ͳ108). The model is based upon the Calveno reference noise factors for automobiles, medium trucks and heavy trucks, with consideration given to vehicle volume, speed, roadway configuration, distance to the receiver, and the acoustical characteristics of the site.
The FHWA model was developed to predict hourly Leq values for freeͲflowing traffic conditions. To predict traffic noise levels in terms of Ldn, it is necessary to adjust the input volume to account for the day/night distribution of traffic.

Project trip generation volumes were provided by the project traffic engineer (RKH Civil and Transportation Engineering 2020), truck usage and vehicle speeds on the local area roadways were estimated from field observations.The predicted increasesin traffic noise levels on the local roadway network for Existing, Baseline, and Cumulative conditions which would result from the project are provided in terms of Ldn.
Traffic noise levels are predicted at the sensitive receptors located at the closest typical setback distance along each projectͲarea roadway segment. In some locations sensitive receptors may not receive full shielding from noise barriers, or may be located at distances which vary from the assumed calculation distance.
Table 4, 5, and 6 summarize the modeled traffic noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors along each roadway segment in the Project area. Appendix C provides the complete inputs and results of the FHWA traffic modeling.

1.b
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx TABLE 4: EXISTING TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL AND PROJECTͲRELATED TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Roadway Segment
Predicted Exterior Noise Level (dBA Ldn) at
Closest Sensitive Receptors
Existing No
Project
Existing +
Project Change
Highway 1 Hwy 1 North to Reina Del Mar Ave 69.8 69.8 0.0 Highway 1 Reina Del Mar Ave to Fassler Ave 72.4 72.4 0.0 Highway 1 Fassler Ave to Crespi Dr 70.2 70.2 0.0
Highway 1 Crespi Dr to Linda Mar Blvd 66.3 66.3 0.0
Highway 1 Linda Mar Blvd to Hwy 1 South 66.6 66.6 0.0
Reina Del Mar Ave Hwy 1 to Reina Del Mar Ave East 62.3 62.3 0.0 Fassler Ave Hwy 1 to Fassler Ave East 61.2 61.2 0.1
Crespi Dr Murphy Rd to McHenry Ave 62.7 62.8 0.1
TABLE 5: BACKGROUND TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL AND PROJECTͲRELATED TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Roadway Segment
Predicted Exterior Noise Level (dBA Ldn) at
Closest Sensitive Receptors
Existing No
Project
Existing +
Project Change
Highway 1 Hwy 1 North to Reina Del Mar Ave 69.8 69.9 0.0 Highway 1 Reina Del Mar Ave to Fassler Ave 72.4 72.5 0.0 Highway 1 Fassler Ave to Crespi Dr 70.2 70.2 0.0
Highway 1 Crespi Dr to Linda Mar Blvd 66.3 66.3 0.0
Highway 1 Linda Mar Blvd to Hwy 1 South 66.6 66.6 0.0
Reina Del Mar Ave Hwy 1 to Reina Del Mar Ave East 62.3 62.3 0.0 Fassler Ave Hwy 1 to Fassler Ave East 61.2 61.3 0.1
Crespi Dr Murphy Rd to McHenry Ave 62.8 62.9 0.1

~--
.------
-·
I
I II
I
I I
I I
I
I
\ I
\
\

1.b
Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx TABLE 6: CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL AND PROJECTͲRELATED TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Roadway Segment
Predicted Exterior Noise Level (dBA Ldn) at
Closest Sensitive Receptors
Existing No
Project
Existing +
Project Change
Highway 1 Hwy 1 North to Reina Del Mar Ave 69.9 69.9 0.0 Highway 1 Reina Del Mar Ave to Fassler Ave 72.5 72.5 0.0 Highway 1 Fassler Ave to Crespi Dr 70.2 70.3 0.0
Highway 1 Crespi Dr to Linda Mar Blvd 66.4 66.4 0.0
Highway 1 Linda Mar Blvd to Hwy 1 South 66.6 66.6 0.0
Reina Del Mar Ave Hwy 1 to Reina Del Mar Ave East 62.3 62.3 0.0 Fassler Ave Hwy 1 to Fassler Ave East 61.3 61.3 0.0
Crespi Dr Murphy Rd to McHenry Ave 62.7 62.8 0.1

CONSTRUCTION NOISE ENVIRONMENT
The Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) was used to predict noise levels for standard construction equipment used for roadway improvement projects.

The assessment of potential significant noise effects due to construction is based on the standards and procedures described in the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) guidance manual and FHWA’s RCNM.

The RCNM is a WindowsͲbased noise prediction model that enables the prediction of construction noise levels for a variety of construction equipment based on a compilation of empirical data and the application of acoustical propagation formulas. It enables the calculation of construction noise levels in more detail than the manual methods, which eliminates the need to collect extensive amounts of projectͲspecific input data. RCNM allows for the modeling of multiple pieces of construction equipment working either independently or simultaneously, the character of noise emission, and the usage factors for each piece of equipment.

Construction noise varies depending on the construction process, type of equipment involved, location of the construction site with respect to sensitive receptors, the schedule proposed to carry out each task (e.g., hours and days of the week), and the duration of the construction work.

Noise sources in the RCNM database include actual noise levels and equipment usage percentages.

This source data was used in this construction noise analysis. Table 7 shows predicted construction noise levels for each of the project construction phases. ~:::----
---
--·

1.b
Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx TABLE 7: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVELS FOR PRIMARY CONSTRUCTION PHASES Equipment Quantity Usage (%) Maximum, Lmax
(dBA at 50 feet)
Hourly Average, Leq
(dBA at 50 feet)
Site Preparation
Graders 1 40 85 81
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 40 82 78
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 40 78 74
Total: 83
Grading
Graders 1 40 85 81
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 40 82 78
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 40 78 74
Total: 83
Foundations
Pile Driver 1 20 101 94
Total: 94
Building Construction
Cranes 1 16 81 73
Forklifts 1 40 83 79
Generator Sets 1 50 73 70
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 40 78 74
Welders 3 40 74 70
Total: 82
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 40 79 75
Pavers 1 50 77 74
Paving Equipment 1 50 77 74
Rollers 1 20 80 73
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 40 78 74
Total: 81
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 40 78 74
Total: 74
Source: FHWA, Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), January 2006.

Based upon the Table 7 data, the loudest phase of construction with an average noise exposure of 94 dBA Leq at 50 feet would occur during pile driving activities.The next loudest phase would be grading and site preparation at 83 dBA Leq at 50 feet.Saxelby Acoustics used the SoundPLAN noise model to calculate noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors in terms of the City’s day/night average (Ldn) noise level criterion.It should be noted that the Ldn calculation conservatively assumes twelve hours ---~--
~
.---·
_,,.--'/ .---·
~ _,,.,,/
.... /
/
//
,/ ,/
I /
I
,'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\ \
\.

1.b
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx of continuous construction between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. The results of the construction noise analysis are shown graphically on Figure 4 (without pile driving) and Figure 5 (with pile driving). A summary of the noise prediction results for each phase of construction are shown in Table 8.

TABLE 8: PREDICTED CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS BY LOUDEST PHASES Receiver (Use) Measured Daytime Noise
Level, Ldn1
Predicted Construction
Noise Level, Ldn
Change
Site Preparation
R1 (Residential) 58 dBA 66 dBA +8 dBA
R2 (Residential) 58 dBA 62 dBA +4 dBA
R3 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 40 dBA +0 dBA
R4 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 60 dBA +8 dBA
R5 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 60 dBA +8 dBA
R6 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 59 dBA +7 dBA
R7 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 59 dBA +7 dBA
R8 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 58 dBA +6 dBA
Grading
R1 (Residential) 58 dBA 66 dBA +8 dBA
R2 (Residential) 58 dBA 62 dBA +4 dBA
R3 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 40 dBA +0 dBA
R4 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 60 dBA +8 dBA
R5 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 60 dBA +8 dBA
R6 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 59 dBA +7 dBA
R7 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 59 dBA +7 dBA
R8 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 58 dBA +6 dBA
Foundations (Pile Driving)
R1 (Residential) 58 dBA 76 dBA +18 dBA
R2 (Residential) 58 dBA 72 dBA +14 dBA
R3 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 51 dBA +0 dBA
R4 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 71 dBA +19 dBA
R5 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 71 dBA +19 dBA
R6 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 70 dBA +18 dBA
R7 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 70 dBA +18 dBA
R8 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 69 dBA +17 dBA
Building Construction
R1 (Residential) 58 dBA 65 dBA +7 dBA
R2 (Residential) 58 dBA 61 dBA +3 dBA
\ \
\ \,
\ '\
'\ \
"-
'•"-.,

1.b
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx 1 As measured at Site LTͲ1.

R3 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 39 dBA +0 dBA
R4 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 59 dBA +7 dBA
R5 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 59 dBA +7 dBA
R6 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 58 dBA +6 dBA
R7 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 58 dBA +6 dBA
R8 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 57 dBA +5 dBA
Paving
R1 (Residential) 58 dBA 64 dBA +6 dBA
R2 (Residential) 58 dBA 60 dBA +2 dBA
R3 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 38 dBA +0 dBA
R4 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 58 dBA +6 dBA
R5 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 58 dBA +6 dBA
R6 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 57 dBA +5 dBA
R7 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 57 dBA +5 dBA
R8 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 56 dBA +4 dBA
Architectural Coating
R1 (Residential) 58 dBA 57 dBA +0 dBA
R2 (Residential) 58 dBA 53 dBA +0 dBA
R3 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 31 dBA +0 dBA
R4 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 51 dBA +0 dBA
R5 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 51 dBA +0 dBA
R6 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 50 dBA +0 dBA
R7 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 50 dBA +0 dBA
R8 (Residential) 52Ͳ58 dBA 49 dBA +0 dBA
---<_-:~ .-----
./
/
,//
/
I
'
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive
City of Pacifica, CaliforniaFigure ϰPredicted dLJƉŝĐĂůConstruction Noise Levels (dBA, Ldn)
R1
1st Floor: 63 dBA
2nd Floor: 64 dBA
3rd Floor: 66 dBA
R3
40 dBA
R2
1st Floor: 60 dBA
2nd Floor: 61 dBA
3rd Floor: 62 dBA
R4
60 dBA
R5
60 dBA
R6
59 dBA
R7
59 dBA
R8
58 dBA
Signs and symbols
Construction Area
Levels in dB(A)
<= 60
60 - 65 65 - 70
70 - 75
> 75
1 : 1615
0 10 20 40 60 80
--====----====---m
ff SAXELBY
<\\ACOUSTICS
Acoustics • Noise • V i brat i on

1.b
Packet Pg. 712
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive
City of Pacifica, CaliforniaFigure 5Pile Driving Construction Noise LevelƐ(dBA, Ldn) R1
1st Floor: 74 dBA
2nd Floor: 75 dBA
3rd Floor: 76 dBA
R3
51 dBA
R2
1st Floor: 70 dBA
2nd Floor: 71 dBA
3rd Floor: 72 dBA
R4
71 dBA
R5
71 dBA
R6
70 dBA
R7
70 dBA
R8
69 dBA
Signs and symbols
Construction Area
Levels in dB(A)
<= 60
60 - 65 65 - 70
70 - 75
1 : 1615
0 10 20
> 75
40 60 80 --==---c:::===---m
ff SAXELBY (\_\ACOUSTICS Acoust i cs • No i se • V i brat i on

1.b
Packet Pg. 713
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx

CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ENVIRONMENT
The primary vibrationͲgenerating activities would occur during pile driving, grading, utilities placement, and parking lot construction. Table 9 shows the typical vibration levels produced by construction equipment.

TABLE 9: VIBRATION LEVELS FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Type of Equipment
Peak Particle Velocity at
25 feet
(inches/second)
Peak Particle Velocity at
50 feet
(inches/second)
Peak Particle Velocity at
100 feet
(inches/second)
Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.031 0.011
Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.027 0.010
Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.001 0.000
Auger/drill Rigs 0.089 0.031 0.011
Jackhammer 0.035 0.012 0.004
Pile Driving (impact) 0.644 0.228 0.081
Pile Driving (sonic) 0.170 0.060 0.023
Vibratory Hammer 0.070 0.025 0.009
Vibratory Compactor/roller 0.210
(Less than 0.20 at 26 feet) 0.074 0.026
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines. Federal Transit Administration. May 2006. 
.,,,.,. ..
/ ,----
// ./"
/ _____ ....
_i
_./
, /
J

1.b
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx

REGULATORY CONTEXT

FEDERAL
There are no federal regulations related to noise that apply to the Proposed Project. STATE
The State Building Code, Title 24, Part 2 of the State of California Code of Regulations, establishes uniform minimum noise insulation performance standards to protect persons within new buildings which house people, including hotels, motels, dormitories, apartment houses, and dwellings other than singleͲfamily dwellings. Title 24 mandates that interior noise levels attributable to exterior sources shall not exceed 45 dB Ldn or CNEL in any habitable room. Title 24 also mandates that for structures containing noiseͲsensitive uses to be located where the Ldn or CNEL exceeds 60 dB, an acoustical analysis must be prepared to identify mechanisms for limiting exterior noise to the prescribed allowable interior levels. If the interior allowable noise levels are met by requiring that windows be kept closed, the design for the structure must also specify a ventilation or air conditioning system to provide a habitable interior environment.

LOCAL
City of Pacifica 1980 General Plan
The 1980 City of Pacifica General Plan has a Noise Element. However, that document suggests that 60 dB CNEL / Ldn is considered to be a "higher noise level". The City staff have used the 60 dB threshold as the test of significance when evaluating projects. The City of Pacifica is in the process of updating the General Plan. However, that General Plan Update and associated EIR have not been adopted.

City of Pacifica General Plan Update
The noise level standards and guiding policies in the City of Pacifica General Plan are consistent with the State of California guidelines for determining land use compatibility and are similar to those used throughout the State. The thresholds for community land use compatibility which are contained within the proposed General Plan Noise Element are shown in Table 10. For proposed land uses in areas where noise exposure may be expected to be greater than the “normally acceptable” threshold, maximum allowable noise exposure with noise mitigation measure is defined in Table 11. Table 12 provides noise emission standards for new stationary noise sources. Listed below are the noise goals, policies, and implementation measures that would be applicable to the proposed project:

Community Noise Exposure
Table 9Ͳ1 presents the community noise exposure matrix, establishing criteria the City can use to evaluate land use compatibility based on noise levels. This matrix is adapted from guidelines provided by the Office of Planning and Research. Noise exposure levels are classified as being “normally

1.b
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx acceptable,” “conditionally acceptable,” “normally unacceptable,” or “clearly unacceptable” for different land use types.

Normally Acceptable
x Indoor Uses: Either the activities associated with the land use are inherently noisy orstandard construction methods will sufficiently attenuate exterior noise to an acceptable level; for land use types that are compatible because of inherent noise levels, sound attenuation must be provided for associated office, retail, and other noiseͲsensitive indoor spaces sufficient to reduce exterior noise to an interior maximum of 50 dB CNEL. x Outdoor Uses: Outdoor activities associated with the land use may be carried out with minimal interference.

Conditionally Acceptable
x Indoor Uses: Noise reduction measures must be incorporated into the design of the project to attenuate exterior noise to the indoor noise levels listed in Table 9Ͳ2 x Outdoor Uses: Noise reduction measures must be incorporated into the design of the project to attenuate exterior noise to the outdoor noise levels listed in Table 9Ͳ2. Acceptability is dependent upon characteristics of the specific use
Normally Unacceptable
x Indoor Uses: Extensive mitigation techniques are required to make the indoor environment acceptͲable for indoor activities. Noise level reductions necessary to attenuate exterior noise to the indoor noise levels listed in Table 9Ͳ2 are difficult to achieve and may not be feasible.
x Outdoor Uses: Severe noise interference makes the outdoor environment unacceptable for outͲdoor activities. Noise level reductions necessary to attenuate exterior noise to the outdoor noise levels listed in Table 9Ͳ2 are difficult to achieve and may not be feasible.

Clearly Unacceptable
x New construction or development should generally not be undertaken.

1.b
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx TABLE 10: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS TABLE 9-1: LAND USE COMPATIBILITY

FOR COMMUNITY NOISE

ENVIRONMENTS
Ext en• or D ay IN. I N ,g It orse Lev e Is
Lat1d Use Category DNL or Ld11 , dB
55 60 65 70 75
ResidentialSlngleFamil)' ,_
ResidentialMulli()le Family
- Traru.ient LodgingMolels., Hotels
Schools, Libraries,
Churches, Hospitals ",
Nursing Homes
Auditoriums, Concerl
Halls,Amphithealers
Sports Arena, Outdoor
Spectator Sports
Playgrounds,
Parks I
Golf Courses, R.idlng
Stabtes., \i\fater
Recreation, Cemeteries
Office Bulldlngs., Business
Com mercial and
Professional
lndustrial,
Manufacturing,
80 -
-
-
,_
Source: Office of Planning and Research, State of California General Plan Guidelines, Append lx A: Guldelines for the Preparation and Content of the Noise PJement of the General Plan, ~ n.ecm.se hospitals are often designed and constructed with high noise lnsuJation properties., it is possible for them to be satisfactorll y localed In noisier areas.

INTERPRETATION
ormalJy Acceptable:

Specified land use is satisfactory,
based upon the assumption that
any buildings. involved are of
normaJ com·emional construction,
without any special noise insulation
requirements
Conditionally Acceptat>Je:

New construction or development
should be undertaken onJy after a
detailed analysis of the noise
reduction requirements is made
and needed noise insulation
fearures ind uded in the design.

Normally Unacceptable:

New construction or development
should gener.illy be discouraged. If
new construction or development
does proceed, a detailed anal)"Sis of
the noise reduction requirements
must t>e made and needed noise
Insulation features ind ucted in the
design.

Clearly Unacceptat>le:

New construction or de\·elopment
clearly should not be undertaken.

1.b
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx TABLE 11: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE ALLOWABLE NOISE EXPOSURE TABLE 12: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN NOISE LEVEL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR STATIONARY NOISE SOURCES Guiding Policies
NOͲGͲ1 Coordination with Other Agencies
Continue to work with other agencies, airports and jurisdictions to reduce noise levels in Pacifica created by their operations.

NOͲGͲ2 Acceptable Noise Environment
Strive to achieve an acceptable noise environment for the environmental, health and safety needs of present and future residents of Pacifica.

NOͲGͲ3 Sensitive Land Uses
Protect noise sensitive land uses, such as schools, hospitals, and senior care facilities, from encroachment of and exposure to excessive levels of noise. 
TABLE 9-2: ALLOWABLE NOISE EXPOSURE
Noise-Sensitive Land Use
Residential
Transient Lodging (Hotels, Motels)
Hospitals, Nursing Homes
Theaters, Auditoriums, Music Halls
Churches, Meeting Halls
Office Buildings
Schools, Libraries, Museums
Outdoor Activity Areas'
DNL/CNEL', dB
65 65
65 65
Interior Spaces
DNL/CNEL2, dB
45 45
45 Leq dB'
35 45
45 45
Outdoor activity areas generally include backyards of single-family residences and outdoor patios, decks or common recreation areas of multi-family developments.
2 The CNEL is used for quantification of aircraft noise exposure as required by CAC Title 21. 3 As determined for a typical worst-case hour during periods of use.

TABLE 9-3: NOISE LEVEL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR STATIONARY NOISE SOURCES1 Hourly Equivalent Sound Level (Leq), dBA
Maximum Sound Level (Lmax), dBA
Daytime (7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.)
50 70
1 As determined at the property line of the receiving noise-sensitive use.

Nighttime (10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.)
45 65

1.b
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx Implementing Policies
NOͲIͲ1 Community Noise Level Standards
Use the Community Noise Level Exposure Standards, shown in Table 9Ͳ1, as review criteria for new land uses. Require all new development that would be exposed to noise greater than the “normally acceptͲable” noise level range to reduce interior noise through design, sound insulation, or other measures.

NOͲIͲ2 Design Features for Noise Reduction
Require noiseͲreducing mitigation to meet allowable outdoor and indoor noise expoͲsure standards in Table 9Ͳ2. Noise mitigation measures that may be approved to achieve these noise level targets include but are not limited to the following:
x Construct façades with substantial weight and insulation; x Use soundͲrated windows for primary sleeping and activity areas; x Use soundͲrated doors for all exterior entries at primary sleeping and activity areas; x Use minimum setbacks and exterior barriers;
x Use acoustic baffling of vents for chimneys, attic and gable ends; x Install a mechanical ventilation system that provides fresh air under closed window conditions.

Alternative acoustical designs that achieve the prescribed noise level standards may be approved, provided that a qualified Acoustical Consultant submits information demonstrating that the alternative designs will achieve and maintain the specific targets for outdoor activity areas and interior spaces.

NOͲIͲ3 Best Available Control Technology
Require new, fixed noise sources (e.g. mechanical equipment) to use best availͲable control technology (BACT) to minimize noise and vibration.

Noise from mechanical equipment can often be reduced by applying soundproofing materials, mufflers, or other controls provided by the manufacturer.

NOͲIͲ4 Mechanical Equipment for New Residential Development Ensure that building regulations require that noiseͲgenerating appliances serving new multiͲfamily or mixedͲuse residential development are located or adequately insulated to protect residents from the noise.

1.b
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx NOͲIͲ5 Noise Criteria for City Equipment
Develop noise criteria for new equipment purchased by the City.

NOͲIͲ6 Construction Noise
Continue to limit hours for certain construction and demolition work to reduce constructionͲrelated noises.

NOͲIͲ7 Noise from Highways and Buses
Work with Caltrans and Sam Trans to mitigate transportationͲrelated noise impacts on residential areas and sensitive uses. This may include encouraging installation of sound barriers or bus stop relocation in selected locations.

NOͲIͲ8 Airport Noise Disclosure Requirements
Update the Municipal Code to ensure that special disclosure requirements concerning airport noise refer to the most current CNEL noise contours developed for San Francisco International Airport.

NOͲIͲ9 Airport Noise Abatement Program
Continue to work with the airport in improving and implementing its noise abatement program.

NOͲIͲ10 Residential Sound Insulation Program
If the airport’s federallyͲapproved 65 dB CNEL annual noise contour is mapped within the City, request that the San FranͲcisco Airport’s Residential Sound Insulation Program allocate available federal and airport funding to sensitive, noiseͲaffected properties in Pacifica.

NOͲIͲ11 Noise Ordinance
Update the noise ordinance to implement General Plan policies and noise standards.

NOͲIͲ12 Noise Enforcement
Establish a Noise Abatement Unit made up of members of the Police and other departments to enforce the City’s noise regulations and assign primary responsibility for coordinating overall noise control effort to one City department.


1.b
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx City of Pacifica Municipal Code
The City of Pacifica Municipal CodeͲSection 8Ͳ1.08 limits hours of construction to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekends.

Criteria for Acceptable Vibration
Vibration is like noise in that it involves a source, a transmission path, and a receiver. While vibration is related to noise, it differs in that in that noise is generally considered to be pressure waves transmitted through air, whereas vibration usually consists of the excitation of a structure or surface.

As with noise, vibration consists of an amplitude and frequency. A person’s perception to the vibration will depend on their individual sensitivity to vibration, as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source and the response of the system which is vibrating.

Vibration can be measured in terms of acceleration, velocity, or displacement. A common practice is to monitor vibration measures in terms of peak particle velocities in inches per second. Standards pertaining to perception as well as damage to structures have been developed for vibration levels defined in terms of peak particle velocities.

Human and structural response to different vibration levels is influenced by a number of factors, including ground type, distance between source and receptor, duration, and the number of perceived vibration events. Table 13, which was developed by Caltrans, shows the vibration levels which would normally be required to result in damage to structures. The vibration levels are presented in terms of peak particle velocity in inches per second.
Table 13 indicates that the threshold for architectural damage to structures is 0.20 in/sec p.p.v.A threshold of 0.20 in/sec p.p.v. is considered to be a reasonable threshold for shortͲterm construction projects.

1.b
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx TABLE 13: EFFECTS OF VIBRATION ON PEOPLE AND BUILDINGS
Peak Particle Velocity Human Reaction Effect on Buildings mm/second in/second

0.15Ͳ0.30 0.006Ͳ0.019 Threshold of perception; possibility of intrusion
Vibrations unlikely to cause damage of
any type

2.0 0.08 Vibrations readily perceptible
Recommended upper level of the
vibration to which ruins and ancient
monuments should be subjected

2.5 0.10 Level at which continuous vibrations
begin to annoy people
Virtually no risk of “architectural”
damage to normal buildings

5.0 0.20
Vibrations annoying to people in
buildings (this agrees with the levels
established for people standing on
bridges and subjected to relative
short periods of vibrations)
Threshold at which there is a risk of
“architectural” damage to normal
dwellingͲhouses with plastered walls
and ceilings. Special types of finish such
as lining of walls, flexible ceiling
treatment, etc., would minimize
“architectural” damage
10Ͳ15 0.4Ͳ0.6
Vibrations considered unpleasant by
people subjected to continuous
vibrations and unacceptable to some
people walking on bridges
Vibrations at a greater level than
normally expected from traffic, but
would cause “architectural” damage
and possibly minor structural damage
Source: Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations. Caltrans. TAV-02-01-R9601. February 20, 2002. ----~:=-
--
,,/
./
I./

1.b
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx

IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project would normally be considered to result in significant noise impacts if noise levels conflict with adopted environmental standards or plans or if noise generated by the project would substantially increase existing noise levels at sensitive receivers on a permanent or temporary basis. Significance criteria for noise impacts are drawn from CEQA Guidelines Appendix G (Items XI [aͲc]).

Would the project:
a. Generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
The proposed project is not located within two miles of a public or private airport, therefore item “c” is not discussed any further in this study.

1.b
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx The City of Pacifica General Plan Noise Element does not establish any specific criteria for evaluating noise level increases.Therefore, the following increase criteria are recommended.

Noise Level Increase Criteria for LongͲTerm ProjectͲRelated Noise Level Increases The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines define a significant impact of a project if it “increases substantially the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas.” Generally, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it will substantially increase the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas or expose people to severe noise levels. In practice, more specific professional standards have been developed. These standards state that a noise impact may be considered significant if it would generate noise that would conflict with local project criteria or ordinances, or substantially increase noise levels at noise sensitive land uses. The potential increase in traffic noise from the project is a factor in determining significance. Research into the human perception of changes in sound level indicates the following:
x A 3ͲdB change is barely perceptible,
x A 5ͲdB change is clearly perceptible, and
x A 10ͲdB change is perceived as being twice or half as loud.

A limitation of using a single noise level increase value to evaluate noise impacts is that it fails to account for preͲprojectͲnoise conditions. Table 14 is based upon recommendations made by the Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) to provide guidance in the assessment of changes in ambient noise levels resulting from aircraft operations. The recommendations are based upon studies that relate aircraft noise levels to the percentage of persons highly annoyed by the noise.

Although the FICON recommendations were specifically developed to assess aircraft noise impacts, it has been accepted that they are applicable to all sources of noise described in terms of cumulative noise exposure metrics such as the Ldn.
TABLE 14: SIGNIFICANCE OF CHANGES IN NOISE EXPOSURE
Ambient Noise Level Without Project, Ldn Increase Required for Significant Impact <60 dB +5.0 dB or more
60Ͳ65 dB +3.0 dB or more
>65 dB +1.5 dB or more
Source: Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON)


1.b
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx Based on the Table 14 data, an increase in the traffic noise level of 5 dB or more would be significant where the preͲproject noise levels are less than 60 dB Ldn, or 3 dB or more where existing noise levels are between 60 to 65 dB Ldn. Extending this concept to higher noise levels, an increase in the traffic noise level of 1.5 dB or more may be significant where the preͲproject traffic noise level exceeds 65 dB Ldn. The rationale for the Table 14 criteria is that, as ambient noise levels increase, a smaller increase in noise resulting from a project is sufficient to cause annoyance.

Noise Level Increase Criteria for ShortͲTerm Noise Level Increases For shortͲterm noise associated with project construction, Saxelby Acoustics recommends use of the Caltrans increase criteria of 12 dBA (Caltrans 2011).

PROJECTͲSPECIFIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
IMPACT 1: WOULD THE PROJECT GENERATE A SUBSTANTIAL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT INCREASE IN

AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT IN EXCESS OF STANDARDS ESTABLISHED IN

THE LOCAL GENERAL PLAN OR NOISE ORDINANCE, OR APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF OTHER AGENCIES?
Exterior noise at New Sensitive Receptors
Based upon ambient noise measurements conducted on the project site, exterior noise levels ranged between 52Ͳ63 dBA Ldn.This exceeds the City of Pacifica existing General Plan standard of 60 dBA Ldn but complies with the proposed General Plan update standard of 65 dBA Ldn.

The City of Pacifica general plan requires that where noise levels exceed 60 dBA, noise reduction measures must be incorporated into the design of the project to attenuate exterior noise levels listed in Table 9Ͳ2. For residential land uses, the interior noise level must be 45 dBA or less. Standard construction methods typically yield a 25 dBA noise reduction. Where noise levels reach 63 dBA Ldn the interior noise level would be 38 dBA. This complies with City of Pacifica allowable traffic noise exposure limits. This is a lessͲthanͲsignificant impact and no mitigation is required.

Traffic Noise Increases
The CEQA guidelines specify criteria to determine the significance of traffic noise impacts. Where existing traffic noise levels are greater than 65 dB Ldn, at the outdoor activity areas of noiseͲsensitive uses, a +1.5 dB Ldn increase in roadway noise levels will be considered significant. The maximum increase is traffic noise at the nearest sensitive receptor is predicted to be 0.1 dBA. Therefore, impacts resulting from increased traffic noise would be considered lessͲthanͲsignificant.

1.b
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx Construction Noise
During the construction phases of the project, noise from construction activities would add to the noise environment in the immediate project vicinity. Based upon the Table 8 data, the proposed project is predicted to generate construction noise levels ranging between 38Ͳ66 dBA Ldn at the nearest noiseͲsensitive receptors (excluding use of pile drivers).Measured ambient noise levels were found to be between 52Ͳ58 dBA Ldn in the vicinity of these uses.Therefore, the proposed project construction could result in periods of typical construction noise +0 to +8 dBA higher than ambient noise in the project area.However, pile driving activities during foundation construction would result in substantially higher noise levels with increases in ambient noise of approximately 14Ͳ19 dBA.

The City of Pacifica Noise Ordinance exempts construction activities from the noise standards, provided that they take place between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM Monday through Saturday and 9:00 AM and 6:00 PM Sundays and holidays.
Construction activities (excluding pile driving) could result in periods of noise which exceed existing noise levels by up to 8 dBA. This complies with the 12 dBA increase criteria. However, pile driving is predicted to result in noise level increases of 14Ͳ19 dBA, thereby exceeding the 12 dBA increase criteria.

Although construction activities are temporary in nature and would occur during normal daytime working hours, constructionͲrelated noise, especially pile driving, could result in sleep interference at existing noiseͲsensitive land uses in the vicinity of the construction if construction activities were to occur outside the normal daytime hours. Therefore, impacts resulting from noise levels temporarily exceeding the threshold of significance due to construction would be considered significant.

Mitigation Measure(s)
Implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce the above impact to a lessͲthanͲ significant level.

MM1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall prepare a construction noise management plan that identifies measures to be taken to minimize construction noise on surrounding sensitive land uses and include specific noise management measures to be included within the project plans and specifications, subject to review and approval by the City Planning Division. The project applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City that the project complies with the following:
x Construction activities shall only take place between the hours limited 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday.

1.b
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx x All heavy construction equipment used on the proposed project shall be maintained in good operating condition, with all internal combustion, engineͲdriven equipment fitted with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition. x All mobile or fixed noise producing equipment used on the proposed project that is regulated for noise output by a local, state, or federal agency shall comply with such regulations while in the source of project activity.
x Where feasible, electricallyͲpowered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal combustion powered equipment.
x All stationary noiseͲgenerating equipment shall be located as far away as possible from neighboring property lines.
x Signs prohibiting unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines shall be posted. x A truck route haul plan shall be created to avoid residential areas. x The use of noiseͲproducing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms and bells shall be for safety warning purposes only.
x Notify neighbors within 500 feet of the construction site of the construction schedule and that there could be noticeable vibration levels resulting from pile driving. x Foundation pile holes shall be preͲdrilled to minimize the number of impacts required to seat the pile.
x Jet or partially jet piles into place to minimize the number of impacts required to seat the pile.
x For impact pile driving, multipleͲpile drivers shall be considered to expedite construction.

Although noise levels generated by multiple pile drivers would be higher than the noise generated by a single pile driver, the total duration of pile driving activities would be reduced.
x For impact pile driving, temporary noise control blanket barriers shall shroud pile drivers or be erected in a manner to shield the adjacent land uses. x A noise complaint coordinator shall be retained amongst the construction crew to be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint isreceived, the coordinatorshall notify the City within 24 hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the compliant, as deemed acceptable by the City. 

1.b
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx IMPACT 2: WOULD THE PROJECT GENERATE EXCESSIVE GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION OR GROUNDBORNE NOISE LEVELS?
Construction vibration impacts include human annoyance and building structural damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of perception.

Building damage can take the form of cosmetic or structural. The Table 9 data indicate that construction vibration levels anticipated for the project are less than the 0.2 in/sec threshold at distances of 26 feet (excluding pile driving). Sensitive receptors which could be impacted by construction related vibrations, especially vibratory compactors/rollers, are located approximately 26 feet, or further, from typical construction activities. At these distances construction vibrations are not predicted to exceed acceptable levels. Additionally, construction activities would be temporary in nature and would likely occur during normal daytime working hours. For pile driving activities, uses located within approximately 50Ͳ100 feet could experience levels of vibration exceeding 0.2 in/sec PPV.Therefore, this impact is significant.

Mitigation Measure(s)
Implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce the above impact to a lessͲthanͲ significant level.

MM2: A construction vibration monitoring plan shall be implemented to document conditions prior to, during, and after pile driving. The construction vibration monitoring plan should be implemented to include the following tasks:
x Identification of sensitivity to groundͲborne vibration of nearby structures. A vibration survey (generally described below) would need to be performed. x Performance of a photo survey, elevation survey, and crack monitoring survey for each of these structures. Surveys shall be performed prior to any pile driving activity, in regular interval during pile driving, and after completion and shall include internal and external crack monitoring in structures, settlement, and distress and shall document the condition of foundations, walls and other structural elements in the interior and exterior of said structures.
x Development of a vibration monitoring and construction contingency plan to identify structures where monitoring would be conducted, set up a vibration monitoring schedule, define structureͲspecific vibration limits, and address the need to conduct photo, elevation, and crack surveys to document before and after pile driving. Alternative construction methods would be identified for when vibration levels approach safe limits.

1.b
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx x If vibration levels approach limits, suspend construction and implement alternative construction methods to either lower vibration levels or secure the affected structures. x Conduct postͲsurvey on structures where either monitoring has indicated high levels or complaints of damage has been made. Make appropriate repairs or compensation where damage has occurred as a result of construction activities.

IMPACT3: FOR A PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN THE VICINITY OF A PRIVATE AIRSTRIP OR AN AIRPORT LAND USE

PLAN OR, WHERE SUCH A PLAN HAS NOT BEEN ADOPTED, WITHIN TWO MILES OF A PUBLIC AIRPORT

OR PUBLIC USE AIRPORT, WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE PEOPLE RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE PROJECT AREA TO EXCESSIVE NOISE LEVELS?
There are no airports in the project vicinity.Therefore, this impact is not applicable to the proposed project.


1.b
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive – City of Pacifica, CA
Job #200204
September 22,
2021
www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\200204 570 Crespi Drive IS\Word\200204 570 Crespi Drive Noise 9Ͳ22Ͳ21.docx

REFERENCES
American National Standards Institute. (1998). [Standard] ANSI S1.43Ͳ1997 (R2007):

Specifications for integratingͲaveraging sound level meters. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
American Standard Testing Methods, Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor AͲWeighted Sound Levels, American Standard Testing Methods (ASTM) E1014Ͳ08, 2008.

ASTM E1014Ͳ12. Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor AͲWeighted Sound Levels. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. 2012.
ASTM E1780Ͳ12. Standard Guide for Measuring Outdoor Sound Received from a Nearby Fixed Source. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. 2012.

Barry, T M. (1978). FHWA highway traffic noise prediction model (FHWAͲRDͲ77Ͳ108).

Washington, DC: U.S. Department of transportation, Federal highway administration, Office of research, Office of environmental policy.
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Technical Noise Supplement, Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, May 2011.

Egan, M. D. (1988). Architectural acoustics. United States of America: McGrawͲHill Book Company. Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. FHWAͲ HEPͲ05Ͳ054 DOTͲVNTSCͲFHWAͲ05Ͳ01. January 2006.

Hanson, Carl E. (Carl Elmer). (2006). Transit noise and vibration impact assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Office of Planning and Environment.
International Electrotechnical Commission. Technical committee 29:Electroacoustics.

International Organization of Legal Metrology. (2013). Electroacoustics: Sound level meters.
International Organization for Standardization. (1996). AcousticͲISO 9613Ͳ2: Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors. Part 2: General methods of calculation. Ginevra:

I.S.O.
Miller, L. N., Bolt, Beranek, & and Newman, Inc. (1981). Noise control for buildings and manufacturing plants. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc. SoundPLAN.SoundPLAN GmbH. Backnang, Germany.http://www.soundplan.eu/english/

1.b
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) ƉƉĞŶĚŝdž͗ĐŽƵƐƚŝĐĂůdĞƌŵŝŶŽůŽŐLJ
ĐŽƵƐƚŝĐƐ dŚĞƐĐŝĞŶĐĞŽĨƐŽƵŶĚ͘
ŵďŝĞŶƚEŽŝƐĞ dŚĞĚŝƐƚŝŶĐƚŝǀĞĂĐŽƵƐƚŝĐĂůĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐŽĨĂŐŝǀĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŝŶŐŽĨĂůůŶŽŝƐĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂƵĚŝďůĞĂƚƚŚĂƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘/ŶŵĂŶLJ ĐĂƐĞƐ͕ƚŚĞƚĞƌŵĂŵďŝĞŶƚŝƐƵƐĞĚƚŽĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĂŶĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŽƌƉƌĞͲƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐƵĐŚĂƐƚŚĞƐĞƚƚŝŶŐŝŶĂŶĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů ŶŽŝƐĞƐƚƵĚLJ͘
^d ƉƉĂƌĞŶƚ ^ŽƵŶĚ dƌĂŶƐŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ ůĂƐƐ͘  ^ŝŵŝůĂƌ ƚŽ ^d ďƵƚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ ƐŽƵŶĚ ĨƌŽŵ ĨůĂŶŬŝŶŐ ƉĂƚŚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐŽƌƌĞĐƚ ĨŽƌ ƌŽŽŵ ƌĞǀĞƌďĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘ůĂƌŐĞƌŶƵŵďĞƌŵĞĂŶƐŵŽƌĞĂƚƚĞŶƵĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƐĐĂůĞ͕ůŝŬĞƚŚĞĚĞĐŝďĞůƐĐĂůĞĨŽƌƐŽƵŶĚ͕ŝƐůŽŐĂƌŝƚŚŵŝĐ͘ ƚƚĞŶƵĂƚŝŽŶ dŚĞƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŶĂĐŽƵƐƚŝĐƐŝŐŶĂů͘
ͲtĞŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ  ĨƌĞƋƵĞŶĐLJͲƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ ĂĚũƵƐƚŵĞŶƚ ŽĨ Ă ƐŽƵŶĚ ůĞǀĞůŵĞƚĞƌ ƚŚĂƚ ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ ƚŚĞ ŽƵƚƉƵƚ ƐŝŐŶĂů ƚŽ ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞ ŚƵŵĂŶ ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ͘
ĞĐŝďĞůŽƌĚ &ƵŶĚĂŵĞŶƚĂů ƵŶŝƚ ŽĨ ƐŽƵŶĚ͕ĞůůŝƐ ĚĞĨŝŶĞĚĂƐ ƚŚĞůŽŐĂƌŝƚŚŵ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƌĂƚŝŽ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƐŽƵŶĚ ƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞ ƐƋƵĂƌĞĚ ŽǀĞƌ ƚŚĞ ƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞƐƋƵĂƌĞĚ͘ĞĐŝďĞůŝƐŽŶĞͲƚĞŶƚŚŽĨĂĞůů͘ E
> ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJEŽŝƐĞ
ƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚ>ĞǀĞů͘ĞĨŝŶĞĚĂƐ ƚŚĞϮϰͲŚŽƵƌĂǀĞƌĂŐĞŶŽŝƐĞůĞǀĞůǁŝƚŚŶŽŝƐĞŽĐĐƵƌƌŝŶŐĚƵƌŝŶŐĞǀĞŶŝŶŐ ŚŽƵƌƐ;ϳͲϭϬƉ͘ŵ͘ͿǁĞŝŐŚƚĞĚďLJнϱĚĂŶĚŶŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞŚŽƵƌƐǁĞŝŐŚƚĞĚďLJнϭϬĚ͘ E> ^ĞĞĚĞĨŝŶŝƚŝŽŶŽĨ>ĚŶ͘
// /ŵƉĂĐƚ /ŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ ůĂƐƐ͘ Ŷ ŝŶƚĞŐĞƌͲŶƵŵďĞƌ ƌĂƚŝŶŐ ŽĨ ŚŽǁ ǁĞůů Ă ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĨůŽŽƌ ĂƚƚĞŶƵĂƚĞƐ ŝŵƉĂĐƚ ƐŽƵŶĚƐ͕ ƐƵĐŚ ĂƐ ĨŽŽƚƐƚĞƉƐ͘ůĂƌŐĞƌŶƵŵďĞƌŵĞĂŶƐŵŽƌĞĂƚƚĞŶƵĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƐĐĂůĞ͕ůŝŬĞƚŚĞĚĞĐŝďĞůƐĐĂůĞĨŽƌƐŽƵŶĚ͕ŝƐůŽŐĂƌŝƚŚŵŝĐ͘ &ƌĞƋƵĞŶĐLJ dŚĞŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŽĨƚŚĞƌĂƉŝĚŝƚLJŽĨĂůƚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨĂƉĞƌŝŽĚŝĐƐŝŐŶĂů͕ĞdžƉƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶĐLJĐůĞƐƉĞƌƐĞĐŽŶĚŽƌŚĞƌƚnj;,njͿ͘ >ĚŶ  ĂLJͬEŝŐŚƚǀĞƌĂŐĞ^ŽƵŶĚ>ĞǀĞů͘^ŝŵŝůĂƌƚŽE
>ďƵƚǁŝƚŚŶŽĞǀĞŶŝŶŐǁĞŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ͘
>ĞƋ 
ƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚŽƌĞŶĞƌŐLJͲĂǀĞƌĂŐĞĚƐŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞů͘
>ŵĂdž  dŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚƌŽŽƚͲŵĞĂŶͲƐƋƵĂƌĞ;ZD^ͿƐŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞůŵĞĂƐƵƌĞĚŽǀĞƌĂŐŝǀĞŶƉĞƌŝŽĚŽĨƚŝŵĞ͘ >;ŶͿ dŚĞƐŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞůĞdžĐĞĞĚĞĚĂĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŝůĞŽǀĞƌĂŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƉĞƌŝŽĚ͘&ŽƌŝŶƐƚĂŶĐĞ͕ĂŶŚŽƵƌůLJ>ϱϬŝƐƚŚĞƐŽƵŶĚ ůĞǀĞůĞdžĐĞĞĚĞĚϱϬйŽĨƚŚĞƚŝŵĞĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞŽŶĞͲŚŽƵƌƉĞƌŝŽĚ͘ >ŽƵĚŶĞƐƐ ƐƵďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƚĞƌŵĨŽƌƚŚĞƐĞŶƐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŵĂŐŶŝƚƵĚĞŽĨƐŽƵŶĚ͘ E/ EŽŝƐĞ/ƐŽůĂƚŝŽŶůĂƐƐ͘ƌĂƚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŶŽŝƐĞƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚǁŽƐƉĂĐĞƐ͘^ŝŵŝůĂƌƚŽ^dďƵƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƐŽƵŶĚ ĨƌŽŵ ĨůĂŶŬŝŶŐƉĂƚŚƐĂŶĚŶŽĐŽƌƌĞĐƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƌŽŽŵƌĞǀĞƌďĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘ EE/ EŽƌŵĂůŝnjĞĚEŽŝƐĞ/ƐŽůĂƚŝŽŶůĂƐƐ͘^ŝŵŝůĂƌƚŽE/ďƵƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂĐŽƌƌĞĐƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƌŽŽŵƌĞǀĞƌďĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘ EŽŝƐĞ  hŶǁĂŶƚĞĚƐŽƵŶĚ͘
EZ EŽŝƐĞZĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚ͘EZŝƐĂƐŝŶŐůĞͲŶƵŵďĞƌƌĂƚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞƐŽƵŶĚͲĂďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĞƋƵĂůƚŽƚŚĞĂƌŝƚŚŵĞƚŝĐ ŵĞĂŶŽĨƚŚĞƐŽƵŶĚͲĂďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶĐŽĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŚĞϮϱϬ͕ϱϬϬ͕ϭϬϬϬ͕ĂŶĚϮ͕ϬϬϬ,njŽĐƚĂǀĞĨƌĞƋƵĞŶĐLJďĂŶĚƐƌŽƵŶĚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞ ŶĞĂƌĞƐƚŵƵůƚŝƉůĞ ŽĨ Ϭ͘Ϭϱ͘/ƚ ŝƐ Ă ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨ ƐŽƵŶĚĞŶĞƌŐLJ ĂďƐŽƌďĞĚ ƵƉŽŶ ƐƚƌŝŬŝŶŐ Ă ƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌ ƐƵƌĨĂĐĞ͘ŶEZŽĨϬŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƉĞƌĨĞĐƚƌĞĨůĞĐƚŝŽŶ͖ĂŶEZŽĨϭŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƉĞƌĨĞĐƚĂďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ͘ ZdϲϬ  dŚĞƚŝŵĞŝƚƚĂŬĞƐƌĞǀĞƌďĞƌĂŶƚƐŽƵŶĚƚŽĚĞĐĂLJďLJϲϬĚŽŶĐĞƚŚĞƐŽƵƌĐĞŚĂƐďĞĞŶƌĞŵŽǀĞĚ͘ ^ĂďŝŶ dŚĞƵŶŝƚŽĨƐŽƵŶĚĂďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ͘KŶĞƐƋƵĂƌĞĨŽŽƚŽĨŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĂďƐŽƌďŝŶŐϭϬϬйŽĨŝŶĐŝĚĞŶƚƐŽƵŶĚŚĂƐĂŶĂďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶŽĨϭ ^ĂďŝŶ͘
^
> ^ŽƵŶĚ
džƉŽƐƵƌĞ>ĞǀĞů͘^
>ŝƐĂƌĂƚŝŶŐ͕ŝŶĚĞĐŝďĞůƐ͕ŽĨĂĚŝƐĐƌĞƚĞĞǀĞŶƚ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐĂŶĂŝƌĐƌĂĨƚĨůLJŽǀĞƌŽƌƚƌĂŝŶƉĂƐƐďLJ͕ƚŚĂƚ ĐŽŵƉƌĞƐƐĞƐƚŚĞƚŽƚĂůƐŽƵŶĚĞŶĞƌŐLJŝŶƚŽĂŽŶĞͲƐĞĐŽŶĚĞǀĞŶƚ͘ ^W ^ƉĞĞĐŚWƌŝǀĂĐLJůĂƐƐ͘^WŝƐĂŵĞƚŚŽĚŽĨƌĂƚŝŶŐƐƉĞĞĐŚƉƌŝǀĂĐLJŝŶďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘/ƚŝƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚ ƚŽŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƚŚĞĚĞŐƌĞĞŽĨ ƐƉĞĞĐŚ ƉƌŝǀĂĐLJ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ ďLJ Ă ĐůŽƐĞĚ ƌŽŽŵ͕ ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĚĞŐƌĞĞ ƚŽ ǁŚŝĐŚ ĐŽŶǀĞƌƐĂƚŝŽŶƐ ŽĐĐƵƌƌŝŶŐ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ĂƌĞ ŬĞƉƚ ƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĨƌŽŵůŝƐƚĞŶĞƌƐŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƌŽŽŵ͘
^d ^ŽƵŶĚdƌĂŶƐŵŝƐƐŝŽŶůĂƐƐ͘^dŝƐĂŶŝŶƚĞŐĞƌƌĂƚŝŶŐŽĨŚŽǁǁĞůůĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶĂƚƚĞŶƵĂƚĞƐĂŝƌďŽƌŶĞƐŽƵŶĚ͘/ƚŝƐǁŝĚĞůLJ ƵƐĞĚ ƚŽ ƌĂƚĞ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌ ƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ĐĞŝůŝŶŐƐͬĨůŽŽƌƐ͕ ĚŽŽƌƐ͕ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ ĂŶĚ ĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌ ǁĂůů ĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘  dŚĞ ^d ƌĂƚŝŶŐ ŝƐ ƚLJƉŝĐĂůůLJƵƐĞĚƚŽƌĂƚĞƚŚĞƐŽƵŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŽĨĂƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞůĞŵĞŶƚǁŚĞŶƚĞƐƚĞĚŝŶůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐǁŚĞƌĞ ĨůĂŶŬŝŶŐƉĂƚŚƐĂƌŽƵŶĚƚŚĞĂƐƐĞŵďůLJĚŽŶ͛ƚĞdžŝƐƚ͘ůĂƌŐĞƌŶƵŵďĞƌŵĞĂŶƐŵŽƌĞĂƚƚĞŶƵĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƐĐĂůĞ͕ůŝŬĞƚŚĞĚĞĐŝďĞů ƐĐĂůĞĨŽƌƐŽƵŶĚ͕ŝƐůŽŐĂƌŝƚŚŵŝĐ͘
dŚƌĞƐŚŽůĚ dŚĞůŽǁĞƐƚƐŽƵŶĚƚŚĂƚĐĂŶďĞƉĞƌĐĞŝǀĞĚďLJƚŚĞŚƵŵĂŶĂƵĚŝƚŽƌLJƐLJƐƚĞŵ͕ŐĞŶĞƌĂůůLJĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ ŽĨ,ĞĂƌŝŶŐ ƚŽďĞϬĚĨŽƌƉĞƌƐŽŶƐǁŝƚŚƉĞƌĨĞĐƚŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ dŚƌĞƐŚŽůĚ ƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϭϮϬĚĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞƚŚƌĞƐŚŽůĚŽĨŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ ŽĨWĂŝŶ
/ŵƉƵůƐŝǀĞ ^ŽƵŶĚŽĨƐŚŽƌƚĚƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƵƐƵĂůůLJůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶŽŶĞƐĞĐŽŶĚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂŶĂďƌƵƉƚŽŶƐĞƚĂŶĚ ƌĂƉŝĚĚĞĐĂLJ͘
^ŝŵƉůĞdŽŶĞ ŶLJƐŽƵŶĚǁŚŝĐŚĐĂŶďĞũƵĚŐĞĚĂƐĂƵĚŝďůĞĂƐĂƐŝŶŐůĞƉŝƚĐŚŽƌƐĞƚŽĨƐŝŶŐůĞƉŝƚĐŚĞƐ͘

1.b
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Appendix B: Continuous and ShortͲTerm
Ambient Noise Measurement Results

1.b
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Thursday, April 9, 2020 12:00 55 70 53 49 Coordinates: 37.5984580°,Thursday, April 9, 2020 13:00 55 77 51 47Thursday, April 9, 2020 14:00 54 66 52 48Thursday, April 9, 2020 15:00 53 70 51 48Thursday, April 9, 2020 16:00 56 81 52 49Thursday, April 9, 2020 17:00 55 76 51 48Thursday, April 9, 2020 18:00 53 68 51 47Thursday, April 9, 2020 19:00 54 84 48 44Thursday, April 9, 2020 20:00 49 66 46 43Thursday, April 9, 2020 21:00 48 71 45 42Thursday, April 9, 2020 22:00 47 66 43 41Thursday, April 9, 2020 23:00 47 68 42 39 Friday, April 10, 2020 0:00 46 70 42 40Friday, April 10, 2020 1:00 44 57 43 40Friday, April 10, 2020 2:00 45 60 43 42Friday, April 10, 2020 3:00 54 77 45 42Friday, April 10, 2020 4:00 51 70 45 42Friday, April 10, 2020 5:00 53 70 50 45Friday, April 10, 2020 6:00 54 69 52 49Friday, April 10, 2020 7:00 54 72 52 49Friday, April 10, 2020 8:00 55 71 53 49Friday, April 10, 2020 9:00 55 72 52 48Friday, April 10, 2020 10:00 55 76 52 47Friday, April 10, 2020 11:00 52 70 50 47 Leq Lmax L50 L90
54 73 51 4751 67 45 4248 66 45 4256 84 53 4944 57 42 3954 77 52 4958 78 CNEL 58 22 Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
Night Average
CAL200
-122.4989071°
Thursday, April 9, 2020 Friday, April 10, 2020
Statistics
Day Average
Appendix B1: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA 570 Crespi Drive IS
Northern Project Boundary
LDL 820-1
70 77
66 70
81 76
68 84
66 71
66 68
70 57
60 77
70 70
69 72 71 72
76 70
49 47 48 48 49 48 47
44 43
42 41
39 40 40
42 42 42
45 49 49 49 48 47 47
55 55
54 53
56 55
53 54
49 48
47 47 46
44 45
54 51
53 54 54 55 55 55 52
25354555657585
Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-1
'b.;,- V)~
■ I'
U !
'°-o
- , 1-: 'I' V)~ 00.6' ~ ::::::,~
Oo"&> -'c::)
~
=
Oo'< c:::c
Oo;s, B'
Oo-i,
Oo'..S'
■ oo...,,
T
Oo"O

00.;,-

00.c>
1 oo._,,
C'

00.~
C'
'b.;,-c'
f oo.,,
■ ? a
v.6'1'
a
Oo.
v.~I'
<1-
'b;s, 'I'

00..i,.
'°-s-1-
'I'
a
v...,,I'
a
v.c>I'

1.b
Packet Pg. 733
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Site: ST-1
Project: 570 Crespi Drive Meter:

Location: South of Project Site Calibrator:

Coordinates: 37.5970769°,
Start:

Stop:

SLM: Model 831
Serial: 2893
Duration: 0:10
Leq: 55
Lmax: 93
Lmin: 40
L50: 44L90: 42
Appendix BϮ: Short Term Noise Monitoring Results
-122.4999696°
2020-04-09 13:05:522020-04-09 13:15:52
Measurement Results, dBA
Highway 1 audible. Lmax caused by passing cars on Anza Drive.

Notes
LDL 831-4CAL200
Noise Measurement Site
33 36
38 42
29 30 31
33 35 36 37
44 47
44 47 47 46
42 40 38 38 38 37 36 36
61 65
68 72 72
75 78 78 78
80 81
83 82 84 83 82 81 81 79 79 78 78
76 76
71 15.025.035.045.055.065.075.085.095.0
Measured Noise Level, dBA
1/3 Octave Band Center Frequency
Measured Ambient Noise Frequency Spectrum
Overall 1/3 Spectra Max 1/3 Spectra
ST-1
■
■
■
■ ■
■
■
■
■
■
■

1.b
Packet Pg. 734
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Site: ST-2
Project: 570 Crespi Drive Meter:

Location: Center of Project Site Calibrator:

Coordinates: 37.5979586°,
Start:

Stop:

SLM: Model 831
Serial: 2893
Duration: 0:10
Leq: 48
Lmax: 58
Lmin: 43
L50: 47L90: 45
Measurement Results, dBA
Highway 1 is primary noise source. Lmax caused by passing vehicle on Crespi Drive.

Notes
LDL 831-4CAL200
-122.4992836°
2020-04-10 13:21:542020-04-10 13:31:54
Appendix Bϯ: Short Term Noise Monitoring Results
Noise Measurement Site
15 21
26 31
32 36
31 28 28
30 32
34 37
39 40 40
39 38
36 35 34 35 35 35 36
22 34
38 50
47 57
45 41 41
43 50 49
51 51 52 50
48 45 46 45
41 41
44 40 39

10.020.030.040.050.060.0
Measured Noise Level, dBA
1/3 Octave Band Center Frequency
Measured Ambient Noise Frequency Spectrum
Overall 1/3 Spectra Max 1/3 Spectra
ST-2
■
Oo,
lbo&>
«:s>
Oa
Vs
Os/:

Cbo;s.
c"'
Oa
lbsc
Ve
Oo, (91'
O·
oo,,.
sc,,.
0,91'
Ooc
Osc
s,,.c:-
Oo;s.

OoS'
0~
Oo&>
lbo,,.

Osc,,.
0,9
0 ~ -
0-
0s
OO;s.
■ S'i-c:-

1.b
Packet Pg. 735
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Appendix C: Traffic Noise Calculation
Inputs and Results

1.b
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Linda Mar Boulevard East of Highway 1 15,440 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 50 0 102 47 22 64.62 Highway 1 North of Linda Mar Boulevard 24,620 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 100 0 315 146 68 67.53 Highway 1 North of Crespi Drive 29,740 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 357 166 77 71.64 Crespi Drive East of Highway 1 7,080 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 55 0 61 28 13 60.65 Highway 1 South of Crespi Drive 24,960 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 110 0 318 148 68 66.96 Highway 1 North of Fassler Avenue 40,210 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 437 203 94 72.97 Fassler Avenue East of Highway 1 11,500 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 65 0 84 39 18 61.68 Highway 1 North of Reina Del Mar Avenue 42,230 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 0 451 209 97 74.3 Segment Roadway Segment
Appendix C-1
200204
FHWA-RD-77-108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model
570 Crespi Drive IS - Existing
Contours (ft.) - No
Offset
Offset
Speed Distance (dB)
% Hvy.

Trucks
% Med.

Trucks
Night
%
Eve
%
Day
ADT %
~ XELBY
~~
.9..~~Il~.~

1.b
Packet Pg. 737
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Linda Mar Boulevard East of Highway 1 15,510 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 50 0 102 47 22 64.72 Highway 1 North of Linda Mar Boulevard 24,710 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 100 0 316 147 68 67.53 Highway 1 North of Crespi Drive 29,830 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 358 166 77 71.64 Crespi Drive East of Highway 1 7,080 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 55 0 61 28 13 60.6 5 Highway 1 South of Crespi Drive 25,050 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 110 0 319 148 69 66.96 Highway 1 North of Fassler Avenue 40,350 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 438 203 94 72.97 Fassler Avenue East of Highway 1 11,650 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 65 0 84 39 18 61.7 8 Highway 1 North of Reina Del Mar Avenue 42,370 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 0 452 210 97 74.3 Offset
(dB)
Contours (ft.) - No
Offset
Eve
%
Night
%
% Med.

Trucks
% Hvy.

Trucks Speed Distance
Appendix C-2FHWA-RD-77-108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model 200204570 Crespi Drive IS - Existing Plus Project
Segment Roadway Segment ADT
Day
%
~ XELBY
~~
.9,~~Il~.~

1.b
Packet Pg. 738
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Linda Mar Boulevard East of Highway 1 15,510 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 50 0 102 47 22 64.72 Highway 1 North of Linda Mar Boulevard 24,710 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 100 0 316 147 68 67.5 3 Highway 1 North of Crespi Drive 29,830 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 358 166 77 71.6 4 Crespi Drive East of Highway 1 7,080 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 55 0 61 28 13 60.6 5 Highway 1 South of Crespi Drive 25,050 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 110 0 319 148 69 66.9 6 Highway 1 North of Fassler Avenue 40,350 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 438 203 94 72.97 Fassler Avenue East of Highway 1 11,650 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 65 0 84 39 18 61.7 8 Highway 1 North of Reina Del Mar Avenue 42,370 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 0 452 210 97 74.3 Offset
(dB)
Contours (ft.) - No
Offset
Eve
%
Night
%
% Med.

Trucks
% Hvy.

Trucks Speed Distance
Appendix C-3FHWA-RD-77-108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model 191204570 Crespi Drive IS - Background
Segment Roadway Segment ADT
Day
%
~ XELBY
~~
.9,~~Il~.~

1.b
Packet Pg. 739
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Linda Mar Boulevard East of Highway 1 15,510 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 50 0 102 47 22 64.72 Highway 1 North of Linda Mar Boulevard 24,710 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 100 0 316 147 68 67.5 3 Highway 1 North of Crespi Drive 29,830 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 358 166 77 71.6 4 Crespi Drive East of Highway 1 7,080 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 55 0 61 28 13 60.6 5 Highway 1 South of Crespi Drive 25,050 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 110 0 319 148 69 66.9 6 Highway 1 North of Fassler Avenue 40,350 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 438 203 94 72.97 Fassler Avenue East of Highway 1 11,650 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 65 0 84 39 18 61.7 8 Highway 1 North of Reina Del Mar Avenue 42,370 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 0 452 210 97 74.3 Offset
(dB)
Contours (ft.) - No
Offset
Eve
%
Night
%
% Med.

Trucks
% Hvy.

Trucks Speed Distance
Appendix C-4FHWA-RD-77-108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model 191204570 Crespi Drive IS - Background Plus Project
Segment Roadway Segment ADT
Day
%
~ XELBY
~~
.9,~~Il~.~

1.b
Packet Pg. 740
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Linda Mar Boulevard East of Highway 1 15,990 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 50 0 104 48 22 64.82 Highway 1 North of Linda Mar Boulevard 25,140 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 100 0 319 148 69 67.63 Highway 1 North of Crespi Drive 30,210 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 361 168 78 71.74 Crespi Drive East of Highway 1 7,130 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 55 0 61 28 13 60.7 5 Highway 1 South of Crespi Drive 25,480 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 110 0 322 150 69 67.06 Highway 1 North of Fassler Avenue 40,840 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 441 205 95 73.07 Fassler Avenue East of Highway 1 11,760 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 65 0 85 39 18 61.7 8 Highway 1 North of Reina Del Mar Avenue 42,860 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 0 456 212 98 74.4 Offset
(dB)
Contours (ft.) - No
Offset
Eve
%
Night
%
% Med.

Trucks
% Hvy.

Trucks Speed Distance
Appendix C-5FHWA-RD-77-108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model 200204570 Crespi Drive IS - Cumulative
Segment Roadway Segment ADT
Day
%
~ XELBY
~~
.9,~~Il~.~

1.b
Packet Pg. 741
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Linda Mar Boulevard East of Highway 1 16,010 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 50 0 104 48 22 64.82 Highway 1 North of Linda Mar Boulevard 25,160 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 100 0 320 148 69 67.63 Highway 1 North of Crespi Drive 30,270 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 361 168 78 71.74 Crespi Drive East of Highway 1 7,210 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 55 0 61 28 13 60.7 5 Highway 1 South of Crespi Drive 25,500 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 110 0 322 150 69 67.06 Highway 1 North of Fassler Avenue 40,900 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 60 0 442 205 95 73.07 Fassler Avenue East of Highway 1 11,760 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 25 65 0 85 39 18 61.7 8 Highway 1 North of Reina Del Mar Avenue 42,920 78 0 22 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 0 456 212 98 74.4 Offset
(dB)
Contours (ft.) - No
Offset
Eve
%
Night
%
% Med.

Trucks
% Hvy.

Trucks Speed Distance
Appendix C-6FHWA-RD-77-108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model 200204570 Crespi Drive IS - Cumulative Plus Project
Segment Roadway Segment ADT
Day
%
~ XELBY
~~
.9,~~Il~.~

1.b
Packet Pg. 742
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use

APPENDIX B

1.b
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Bay Delta Region
2825 Cordelia Road, Suite 100
Fairfield, CA 94534
(707) 428-2002
www.wildlife.ca.gov
Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870
October 28, 2024
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica, Planning Department
1800 Francisco Boulevard
Pacifica, CA 94044
[email protected]
Subject: 570 Crespi Drive Project, Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2021120126, City of Pacifica, San Mateo County Dear Brianne Harkousha:

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has reviewed the City of Pacifica (City) Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the 570 Crespi Drive Project (Project) pursuant the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines.1
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect fish and wildlife resources of the State. Please be advised, by law, CDFW may be required to carry out or approve aspects of the Project through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code.

CDFW is providing the City, as the Lead Agency, with specific detail about the scope and content of the environmental information related to CDFW’s area of statutory responsibility that must be included in the EIR (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15082, subd. (b)).

CDFW ROLE
CDFW is California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State. (Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a)). CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species. (Id., § 1802.) For purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on projects and related activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources.

CDFW is also submitting comments as a Responsible Agency under CEQA. (Pub.

Resources Code, § 21069; CEQA Guidelines, § 15381.) CDFW expects that it may need to exercise regulatory authority over the Project pursuant to the Fish and Game Code. For example, the Project may be subject to CDFW’s Lake and Streambed Alteration (LSA) regulatory authority, if the Project impacts the bed, channel or bank of any river, stream or lake within the State (Fish & G. Code, § 1600 et seq.). Likewise, to the extent the Project may result in “take” as defined by State law of any species protected under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.), the project proponent may seek related take authorization as provided by the Fish and Game Code.

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
California Endangered Species Act
A CESA Incidental Take Permit (ITP) must be obtained from CDFW if the Project has the potential to result in “take” of plants or animals listed under CESA, either during 1 CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21000 et seq. The “CEQA Guidelines” are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with section 15000. 






  







 
Packe
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica
October 28, 2024

construction or over the life of the Project. Under CESA, “take” means “hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill.” (Fish & G.

Code, § 86.) CDFW’s issuance of an ITP is subject to CEQA and to facilitate permit issuance, any project modifications and mitigation measures must be incorporated into the CEQA document analysis, discussion, and mitigation monitoring and reporting program. If the Project will impact CESA listed species, early consultation is encouraged, as significant modification to the Project and mitigation measures may be required in order to obtain a CESA permit.

CEQA requires a mandatory finding of significance if a project is likely to substantially impact threatened or endangered species. Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21001, subd. (c) & 21083; CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15380, 15064 & 15065.) In addition, pursuant to CEQA, the lead agency cannot approve a project unless all impacts to the environment are avoided or mitigated to less-than-significant levels, or the Lead Agency makes and supports findings of overriding consideration for impacts that remain significant despite the implementation of all feasible mitigation. Findings of consideration under CEQA, however, do not eliminate the Project proponent’s obligation to comply with the Fish and Game Code.

Lake and Streambed Alteration
CDFW requires an LSA Notification, pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq., for Project activities affecting river, lakes or streams and associated riparian habitat. Notification is required for any activity that may substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow; change or use material from the bed, channel, or bank (including associated riparian or wetland resources); or deposit or dispose of material where it may pass into a river, lake, or stream. Work within ephemeral streams, drainage ditches, washes, watercourses with a subsurface flow, and floodplains is generally subject to notification requirements. In addition, infrastructure installed beneath such aquatic features, such as through hydraulic directional drilling, is also generally subject to notification requirements. Therefore, any impact to the mainstems, tributaries, or floodplains or associated riparian habitat caused by the proposed Project will likely require an LSA Notification. CDFW may not execute a final LSA Agreement until it has considered the final EIR and complied with its responsibilities as a responsible agency under CEQA.

Migratory Birds and Raptors
CDFW has authority over actions that may result in the disturbance or destruction of active bird nest sites or the unauthorized take of birds. Fish and Game Code sections protecting birds, their eggs, and nests include section 3503 (regarding unlawful take, possession, or needless destruction of the nests or eggs of any bird), section 3503.5 (regarding the take, possession, or destruction of any birds-of-prey or their nests or eggs), and section 3513 (regarding unlawful take of any migratory nongame bird).

Migratory birds are also protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION SUMMARY
Proponent: Brendan Murphy
Objective: The objective of the Project is to purchase a parcel (APN 022-162-420, located at 540 Crespi Drive) from the City of Pacifica, and combine 0.7 acres of that parcel with the entirety of the 0.98-acre lot (APN 022-162-310), located at 570 Crespi Drive. This new 1.68-acre parcel would be developed with one two-story mixed-use building and two three-story residential buildings, including one commercial condominium and 19 residential condominiums, along with a new driveway and parking spaces.

Location: 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, San Mateo County, Crossroads: Anza Drive and Cabrillo Hwy, 37.597975, -122.499232.







  







 
Packe
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica
October 28, 2024

Timeframe: Approximately summer 2025 through early 2027.

The CEQA Guidelines (§§15124 & 15378) require that the draft EIR incorporate a full Project description, including reasonably foreseeable future phases of the Project, and that contains sufficient information to evaluate and review the Project’s environmental impact. Please include a complete description of the following Project components in the Project description including, but not limited to, the below information. x Land use changes resulting from, for example, rezoning certain areas. x Footprints of permanent Project features and temporarily impacted areas, such as staging areas and access routes.
x Area and plans for any proposed buildings/structures, ground-disturbing activities, fencing, paving, stationary machinery, landscaping, and stormwater systems. x Operational features of the Project, including level of anticipated human presence (describe seasonal or daily peaks in activity, if relevant), artificial lighting/light reflection, noise, traffic generation, and other features. x Construction schedule, activities, equipment, and crew sizes.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Sufficient information regarding the environmental setting is necessary to understand any potentially significant impacts on the environment of the proposed Project and any alternatives identified in the draft EIR (CEQA Guidelines, §§15125 & 15360). CDFW recommends the draft EIR provide baseline habitat assessments for special-status plant, fish and wildlife species located and potentially located within the Project area and surrounding lands, including all rare, threatened, and endangered species (CEQA Guidelines, §15380). The draft EIR should describe aquatic habitats, such as wetlands or waters of the U.S. or State, and any sensitive natural communities or riparian habitat occurring on or adjacent to the Project site (for sensitive natural communities see:https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/VegCAMP/NaturalCommunities#sensitive%20natural%2 0communities), and any stream or wetland set back distances the City may require.

Fully protected, threatened or endangered, candidate, and other special-status species or sensitive natural communities that are known to occur, or have the potential to occur in or near the Project site, include, but are not limited to:

Common Name Scientific Name Status
California red-legged frog
(CRLF)
Rana draytonii FT, SSC
Big free-tailed bat Nyctinomops macrotis SSC
Merlin Falco columbarius WL
Myrtle’s silverspot butterfly Speyeria zerene myrtleae FE, ICP Obscure bumble bee Bombus calignosus ICP
San Francisco garter snake
(SFGS)
Thamnophis sirtalis tetrataenia FE, SE, SP
Steelhead – Central California
Coast DPS
Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus FT, SSC
Western bumble bee Bombus occidentalis CE, ICP
Franciscan thistle Cirsium andrewsii CRPR 1B.2







  







 
Packe
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica
October 28, 2024

Common Name Scientific Name Status
Kellogg’s horkelia Horkelia cuneata var. sericea CRPR 1B.1 Pappose tarplant Centromadia parryi ssp. Parryi CRPR 1B.2 Perennial goldfields Lasthenia californica ssp.

Macrantha
CRPR 1B.2
Robbin’s broomrape Aphyllon robbinsii CRPR 1B.1
Rose leptosiphon Leptosiphon rosaceus CRPR 1B.1
San Francisco spineflower Chorizanthe cuspidata var.
cuspidata
CRPR 1B.2
San Francisco collinsia Collinsia multicolor CRPR 1B.2
Scouler’s catchfly Silene scouleri ssp. scouleri CRPR 2B.2 Nesting birds
Bats
Rare plants
Other aquatic and riparian species
Notes:

FT = listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act; FE = listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act; ST = listed as threatened under CESA; SE = listed as endangered under CESA; SSC = state species of special concern; SP = state listed as fully protected; CE = state candidate endangered; CRPR = California Rare Plant Rank; WL = state watch list; ICP = California Terrestrial and Vernal Pool Invertebrate of Conservation Priority.

Habitat descriptions and species profiles included in the draft EIR should include robust information from multiple sources: aerial imagery; historical and recent survey data; field reconnaissance; scientific literature and reports; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Information, Planning, and Consultation System; California Aquatic Resources Inventory; and findings from “positive occurrence” databases such as California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). Only with sufficient data and information can the City adequately assess which special-status species are likely to occur in the Project vicinity.

CDFW recommends surveys be conducted for special-status species with potential to occur, following recommended survey protocols if available. Survey and monitoring protocols and guidelines are available at:
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Survey-Protocol.

Botanical surveys for special-status plant species, including those listed by the California Native Plant Society (http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/inventory/), should also be conducted during the blooming period for all sensitive plant species potentially occurring within the Project area and include the identification of reference populations.

Please refer to CDFW protocols for surveying and evaluating impacts to rare plants available at: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Plants.

IMPACT ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
The CEQA Guidelines (§15126.2) necessitate the draft EIR discuss all direct and indirect impacts (temporary and permanent) that may occur with implementation of the Project. This includes evaluating and describing impacts such as:







  







 
Packe
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica
October 28, 2024

x Land use changes that would reduce open space or agricultural land uses and increase residential or other land use involving increased development; x Changes in hydrological conditions that could alter the timing and magnitude of streamflow both during construction and operation of the Project; x Potential for impacts to special-status species;
x Loss or modification of breeding, nesting, dispersal and foraging habitat, including vegetation removal, alternation of soils and hydrology, and removal of habitat structural features (e.g., snags, roosts, overhanging banks); x Permanent and temporary habitat disturbances associated with ground disturbance, noise, lighting, reflection, air pollution, traffic or human presence; and
x Obstruction of movement corridors, fish passage, or access to water sources and other core habitat features.
x Water quality impacts resulting from construction and operation of the Project; x Impacts both from construction and operation of the Project; x Impacts to the bed, channel, and bank, in the reservoirs and creeks downstream of the Project; and
x Impacts to bed, channel, bank, and riparian habitat, and the direct and indirect effects to fish, wildlife, and their habitat;
The CEQA document also should identify existing and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Project vicinity, disclose any cumulative impacts associated with these projects, determine the significance of each cumulative impact, and assess the significance of the Project’s contribution to each impact (CEQA Guidelines, §15355).

Although a project’s impacts may be insignificant individually, its contributions to a cumulative impact may be considerable; a contribution to a significant cumulative impact (e.g., reduction of available habitat for a listed species) should be considered cumulatively considerable without mitigation to minimize or avoid the impact.

The CEQA Guidelines direct the City, as the Lead Agency, to consider and describe in the draft EIR all feasible mitigation measures to avoid and/or mitigate potentially significant impacts of the Project on the environment based on comprehensive analysis of the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the Project. (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15021, 15063, 15071, 15126.2, 15126.4 & 15370.) This should include a discussion of take avoidance and minimization measures for special-status species, which are recommended to be developed in early consultation with the USFWS, the National Marine Fisheries Service and CDFW. These measures can then be incorporated as enforceable Project conditions to reduce potential impacts to biological resources to less-than-significant levels.

Fully protected species, such as SFGS, may not be taken or possessed at any time and no licenses or permits may be issued for their take except as follows:
x Take is for necessary scientific research;
x Efforts to recover a fully protected, endangered, or threatened species; x Live capture and relocation of a bird species for the protection of livestock; or 






  







 
Packe
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica
October 28, 2024

x They are a covered species whose conservation and management is provided for in a Natural Community Conservation Plan (Fish and G. Code §§ 3511, 4700, 5050, & 5515).

Specified types of infrastructure projects may be eligible for an incidental take permit for unavoidable impacts to fully protected species if certain criteria are met (Fish & G. Code § 2081.15). Project proponents should consult with CDFW early in the project planning process.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the information provided in the NOP of a draft EIR CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist the City in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, direct and/or indirect impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources. These comments and recommendations are not an exhaustive list and CDFW may provide additional recommendations as more Project specific information is disclosed. The draft EIR must include a full Project Description, Environmental Setting, and Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures as outlined above. Editorial comments or other suggestions may also be included to improve the document.

COMMENT 1: San Francisco Garter Snake
Issue: The Project is located within one mile of areas where SFGS, a state and federally listed endangered species and state fully protected species, is known to occur (CNDDB 2024, iNaturalist 2024). The Project is immediately adjacent to wetlands and associated uplands that may provide habitat for SFGS.

Evidence impact would be significant: SFGS are endemic snakes with a highly limited range in the San Francisco Peninsula. They are threatened by loss of habitat from agricultural, commercial, and urban development, illegal collection by reptile breeders, and decline of their prey species, CRLF (USFWS 2007, USFWS 2020).

Project activities could impact upland habitat used for shelter, and vehicles or heavy equipment operated at the Project site could roll over basking SFGS, causing injury or mortality, and could result in a substantial reduction to SFGS populations.

Recommendation: CDFW recommends the draft EIR provide a detailed SFGS habitat assessment at and near the Project site, including identification of upland sites for basking; rodent burrows for shelter; and slow, flowing aquatic habitat, such as streams and low-lying marshes for feeding and reproduction. A qualified biologist should conduct the habitat assessment prior to initiating Project activities. A qualified biologist is an individual who holds a bachelor’s degree from an accredited university and: 1) is knowledgeable in relevant species’ life histories and ecology, 2) can correctly identify relevant species, 3) has conducted field surveys for relevant species, 4) is familiar with relevant survey protocols, and 5) is knowledgeable of state and federal laws regarding the protection of sensitive species.

If the habitat assessment described above identifies potentially suitable SFGS habitat at or near the Project site, the draft EIR should identify whether the habitat can be avoided and how take of SFGS will be avoided. The draft EIR should also incorporate avoidance measures in coordination with CDFW, as appropriate.

COMMENT 2: California Red-Legged Frog
Issue: The Project site is half a mile from areas where CRLF, a federally threatened and state special status species, is known to occur (CNDDB 2024). The Project site is immediately adjacent to wetland habitat that could support populations of CRLF.

Evidence impact would be significant: CRLF populations throughout the State have experienced ongoing and drastic declines and many have been extirpated. CRLF 






  







 
Packe
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica
October 28, 2024

primarily inhabit waterways including marshes, streams, and lagoons, and the species will also breed in ephemeral waters (Thomson et al. 2016). Habitat loss from growth of cities and suburbs, invasion of nonnative plants, impoundments, water diversions, stream maintenance for flood control, degraded water quality, and introduced predators, such as bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) are the primary threats to CRLF (Thomson et al. 2016, USFWS 2017). Project land development could impact CRLF populations that may exist within the vicinity of the Project Site through loss of upland habitat used for feeding and shelter or through impacts to adjacent wetland habitat, including but not limited to pollutant or sediment runoff into wetlands as a result of Project activities.

Recommendation: To evaluate potential impacts to CRLF, CDFW recommends that a qualified wildlife biologist conduct a site assessment for CRLF in accordance with the USFWS “Revised Guidance on Site Assessment and Field Surveys for the California Red-legged Frog” (USFWS 2005) to determine if CRLF are likely to be within or adjacent to the Project area. Results of the site assessment should be included in the draft EIR.

If the site assessment indicates that CRLF could occur at the Project site, then the draft EIR should require that a qualified biologist conduct pre-construction surveys prior to commencement of construction. If any CRLF are found during pre-construction surveys or at any time during construction, the qualified biologist should immediately inform CDFW and USFWS; consultation with USFWS is warranted to determine if the Project can avoid take. In addition, If CRLF could occur on site, then CDFW recommends that initial ground-disturbing activities be timed to avoid the period when CRLF are most likely to be moving through upland areas (November 1 and March 31). When grounddisturbing activities must take place between November 1 and March 31, CDFW recommends a qualified biologist monitor construction activity daily for CRLF.

COMMENT 3: Tree removal and bird impacts
Issue: The Project proposes to remove several large trees which, along with adjacent wetland habitat, may provide habitat for a variety of nesting birds. Additionally, the glass used for exterior building windows could result in bird collisions, which can cause bird injury and mortality.

Evidence impact would be significant: Human activity and removal of habitat has contributed to the loss of a significant proportion of the total number of birds in the United States and Canada since the 1970s (Rosenburg et al. 2019). Nesting birds may be disturbed by Project noise or human presence, which could lead to nest abandonment or reduced health and vigor of young, a potentially significant impact.

Additionally, birds cannot typically see clear or reflective glass, and can collide with glass (e.g., windows) that reflect surrounding landscape and/or habitat features (Klem and Saenger 2013, Sheppard 2019). When birds collide with glass, they can be injured or killed. In the United States, the estimated annual bird mortality is between 365-988 million birds (Loss et al. 2014). The Project proposes to remove large trees and construct three residential buildings, which could impact birds nesting in trees or adjacent wetland habitat during construction as well as after Project completion.

Recommendation: If vegetation removal and other construction-related activities are scheduled during the nesting season, February 1 to September 1, CDFW recommends a focused survey for active nests be conducted by a qualified biologist within seven days prior to the beginning of Project-related activities. If an active nest is found, the qualified biologist should delineate a no-work-zone buffer distance around the nest that is site- and species-specific using high visibility fencing or flagging. The buffer distance should be specified to protect the bird’s normal behavior and prevent nesting failure or abandonment. No work should occur within the no-work zone until the nest is no longer active, as determined by a qualified biologist. If a lapse in Project-related work of seven days or longer occurs, another focused survey should occur before Project work is reinitiated.







  







 
Packe
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica
October 28, 2024

CDFW also recommends incorporating visual signals or cues to exterior windows to prevent bird collisions. Visual signals or cues include, but are not limited to, patterns to break up reflective areas, external window films and coverings, ultraviolet patterned glass, and screens. For best practices on how to reduce bird collisions with windows, please go to the USFWS’s website for Buildings and Glass (https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-birds/collisions/buildings-andglass.php).

COMMENT 4: Habitat connectivity
Issue: The Project site is currently undeveloped, supporting several large trees with herbaceous groundcover in the northern portion of the site, with gradual domination of wetland vegetation and a seasonal drainage area providing riparian habitat in the southern portion of the project site. The proposed Project would involve disturbance of existing on-site habitat through development of the site including removal of vegetation and construction of three buildings, which could impact connectivity between upper watershed habitat and the Pacific coast.

Evidence impact would be significant: Landscape connectivity is vital to conserving resilient wildlife populations, particularly those that have already been severely impacted by human development activities (Serieys et al. 2020). Preservation or restoration of patches of habitat is required to maintain connectivity, in conjunction with identification and mitigation of factors that limit movement, both within individual parcels and across landscapes. The Project site could offer a linkage to the Pacific coast or the nearby San Pedro Creek for migratory species, and development of the on-site habitat could result in significant adverse impacts to area-sensitive, barrier-sensitive, or less mobile migratory species (Spencer et al. 2010).

Recommendation: CDFW recommends that a qualified biologist conduct a biological resource assessment of the Project site and adjacent habitat the Project could impact and incorporate it into the initial study and draft EIR. Permanent loss of habitat caused by Project activities should be mitigated by establishing permanent preservation of the wetlands area of the Project site through a conservation easement and provision of an endowment for long-term management. Alternately, the project proponent could mitigate permanent impacts from the Project through purchasing mitigation or conservation bank credits, if bank credits are available for the area. CDFW recommends consulting with CDFW scientists to determine appropriate mitigation for the draft EIR.

COMMENT 5: Special-status plants
Issue: The Project site contains wetland and upland habitat that may be suitable for special-status plants. The Project has the potential to crush and kill special-status plants during ground-disturbing activities, permanently remove habitat, and permanently alter the hydrology of the site by increasing impermeable surfaces and redirecting storm water. Without floristic botanical surveys, the Project would not accurately identify special-status plant occurrences and could impact them.

Recommendation: To reduce potential impacts to special-status plants to less-thansignificant, CDFW recommends the following mitigation measure.

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Special-status Plant Survey and Avoidance: A qualified botanist shall conduct surveys during the appropriate blooming period for all specialstatus plants that have the potential to occur on or adjacent to the Project area prior to the start of ground-disturbing activities and prepare a report documenting survey findings, to be incorporated into the EIR. Habitat adjacent to the Project area should be surveyed if the Project may have indirect impacts off-site as a result of changes to hydrological conditions or other indirect impacts. More than one year of surveys may be necessary. Surveys and reporting shall be conducted following Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special-Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive 






  







 
Packe
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica
October 28, 2024

Natural Communities. Surveys shall be submitted to CDFW for review and written acceptance. If special-status plants are found during surveys, the Project shall be redesigned to avoid impacts to special-status plants. If impacts to any special-status plants cannot be avoided completely during the Project, the Project shall provide mitigation including onsite restoration and a restoration plan approved by CDFW, offsite habitat preservation at a 3:1 mitigation to impact ratio based on acreage or number of plants, as appropriate, or another method accepted in writing by CDFW. The qualified botanist shall be knowledgeable about plant taxonomy, familiar with plants of the region, and have experience conducting botanical field surveys according to vetted protocols.

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database which may be used to prepare subsequent CEQA documents or to make supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (d) & (e)). Accordingly, please report any special-status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to CNDDB. The CNDDB field survey form can be filled out and submitted online here:
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data. The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found here: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-andAnimals.

ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FILING FEES
CDFW anticipates that the proposed Project, will have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of environmental document filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the environmental document filing fee is required in order for the underlying project approval to be operative, vested, and final. (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089.)

CONCLUSION
CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the NOP of a draft EIR in order to assist the City in identifying and mitigating Project impacts on biological resources.

Questions regarding this letter or further coordination should be directed to Shannon Husband, Environmental Scientist, at (707) 337-1364 or [email protected]; or Wes Stokes, Senior Environmental Scientist (Supervisory) at (707) 339-6066 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Erin Chappell
Regional Manager
Bay Delta Region
ec: Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse (SCH No. 2021120126) City of Pacifica, [email protected]

REFERENCES
CNDDB. 2024. RareFind 5. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Government Version 5.3.0 dated September 29, 2024.
iNaturalist. 2024. Available from https://www.inaturalist.org. Accessed on October 9, 2024.







  







 
Packe
Brianne Harkousha
City of Pacifica
October 28, 2024

Klem, D. and P. G. Saenger. 2013. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Select Visual Signals to Prevent Bird-window Collisions. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 125(2):406-411.

Loss, S.R., T. Will, S.S. Loss, and P.P. Marra. 2014. Bird-building collisions in the United States: estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability. Condor 116: 8-23.

Rosenburg, Kenneth V.; Dokter, Adriaan M.; Blancher, Peter J.; Sauer, John R.; Smith, Adam C.; Smith, Paul A.; Stanton, Jessica C.; Panjabi, Avrind; Helft, Laura; Parr, Michael; and Marra, Peter P. 2019. Decline of the North American Avifauna.

Science: 120-124
Sheppard, C. D. 2019. Evaluating the relative effectiveness of patterns on glass as deterrents of bird collisions with glass. Global Ecology and Conservation 20:e00795.

Spencer, W.D., P. Beier, K. Penrod, K. Winters, C. Paulman, H. Rustigian-Romsos, J.

Strittholt, M. Parisi, and A. Pettler. 2010. California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project: A Strategy for Conserving a Connected California. Prepared for California Department of Transportation, California Department of Fish and Game, and Federal Highways Administration.

Thomson, R. C., A.N. Wright, and H.B. Shaffer. 2016. California Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern. California Department of Fish and Wildlife and University of California Press.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2005. Revised Guidance on Site Assessment and Field Surveys for the California Red-legged Frog. March 2005. 26 pp.

USFWS. 2007. Species Account San Francisco Garter Snake (Thamnophis Sirtalis Tetrataenia). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California.

USFWS. 2017. Species Account for California Red-legged frog. March 2017. 1 pp.

USFWS. 2020. Species Status Assessment for the San Francisco gartersnake (Thamnophis sirtalis tetrataenia), Version 1.0. May 2020. Sacramento, CA. 






  







 
Packe
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.” DISTRICT 4

OFFICE OF REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY PLANNING
P.O. BOX 23660, MS–10D | OAKLAND, CA 94623-0660
www.dot.ca.gov
November 1, 2024 SCH #: 2021120126
GTS #: 04-SM-2021-00630
GTS ID: 24973
Co/Rt/Pm: SM/1/41.25
Brianne Harkousha, Senior Planner
City of Pacifica
170 Santa Maria Ave
Pacifica, CA 94044-2506
Re: 570 Crespi Drive Project ɔ Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)
Dear Brianne Harkousha:

Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the environmental review process for the 570 Crespi Drive Project. The Local Development Review (LDR) Program reviews land use projects and plans to ensure consistency with our mission and state planning priorities. The following comments are based on our review of the October 2024 NOP.

Please note this correspondence does not indicate an official position by Caltrans on this project and is for informational purposes only.

Project Understanding
The proposed project would develop one two-story mixed-use building and two threestory residential buildings to construct one commercial condominium and 19 residential condominiums on a 1.68-acre parcel. Proposed off-site improvements for the project include the removal of two trees and construction of a new driveway and associated parking spaces at the northern portion of the existing adjacent Pacific Community Center. The off-site improvements are directly adjacent to a State-owned parking lot that is within Caltrans right-of-way (ROW). The project site itself is also within 500 feet of State Route (SR) 1.

Travel Demand Analysis
With the enactment of Senate Bill (SB) 743, Caltrans is focused on maximizing efficient development patterns, innovative travel demand reduction strategies, and multimodal improvements. For more information on how Caltrans assesses Vehicle

CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR California Department of Transportation

1.b
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Brianne Harkousha, Senior Planner
November 1, 2024

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.” Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis for land use projects, please review Caltrans’ Transportation Impact Study Guide (link).

Per the Initial Study, this proposed project may have a potentially significant VMT impact which will be further evaluated in the DEIR. Caltrans looks forward to reviewing the project’s VMT analysis in the DEIR when it is available.

Construction-Related Impacts
Potential impacts to the State ROW from project-related temporary access points should be analyzed. Mitigation for significant impacts due to construction and noise should be identified. Project work that requires movement of oversized or excessive load vehicles on State roadways requires a transportation permit that is issued by Caltrans. To apply, please visit Caltrans Transportation Permits (link).

Prior to construction, coordination may be required with Caltrans to develop a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) to reduce construction traffic impacts to the State Transportation Network (STN).

Equitable Access
If any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, those facilities must meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards after project completion. As well, the project must maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction. These access considerations support Caltrans’ equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable transportation network for all users.

Encroachment Permit
Please be advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans’ ROW requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. As part of the encroachment permit submittal process, you may be asked by the Office of Encroachment Permits to submit a completed encroachment permit application package, digital set of plans clearly delineating Caltrans’ ROW, digital copy of signed, dated and stamped (include stamp expiration date) traffic control plans, this comment letter, your response to the comment letter, and where applicable, the following items: new or amended Maintenance Agreement (MA), approved Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD), approved encroachment exception request, and/or airspace lease agreement.

The Office of Encroachment Permit requires 100% complete design plans and supporting documents to review and circulate the permit application package. To obtain more information and download the permit application, please visit Caltrans Encroachment Permits (link). Please note that the checklist TR-0416 is used to determine the appropriate Caltrans review process for encroachment projects. Your application package may be emailed to [email protected].

1.b
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Brianne Harkousha, Senior Planner
November 1, 2024

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.” Thank you again for including Caltrans in the environmental review process. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Luana Chen, Transportation Planner, via [email protected].

For future early coordination opportunities or project referrals, please visit Caltrans LDR website (link) or contact [email protected].

Sincerely,

YUNSHENG LUO
Branch Chief, Local Development Review
Office of Regional and Community Planning
c: State Clearinghouse

1.b
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

APPENDIX
C

1.b
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Technical Memorandum
DATE: August 17, 2020
TO: Brendan Murphy, Eamon Murphy
BayWorks Construction, Inc.

P.O. Box 301
San Mateo, CA 94401
FROM: Chris Rogers
SUBJECT: Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica CA
A 2014 Biological Constraints Analysis1 report was prepared in 2014 for the single parcel at 570 Crespi Avenue. The current development proposal for this parcel (referred to herein as the Murphy parcel) now also includes the adjacent parcel at 540 Crespi Avenue (APN 540 and 570 Crespi Drive, in Pacifica, CA (APN 022-162-420 and 022-162-310) which is owned by the City of Pacifica. The parcels are owned by the City of Pacifica and by Brendan and Eamon Murphy, respectively, and are referred to here as the City parcel and the Murphy parcel (see Figures 1 and 2). The two parcels are under consideration for being merged and developed by the Murphys.

A peer review of the original biology report2
recommended several information items to enable the City to make planning decisions with regard to biological resources. Because the 2014 report is technically sound (according to the peer review), this memorandum focuses on the items that require update or revision. This memorandum amends the 2014 report in response to the following peer review recommendations:
x Include both parcels that are the subject of the current development proposal. x Include California Rare Plant Rank 3 plants, which should be analyzed during environmental review under CEQA.
x Expand the analysis to include plants, wildlife and natural communities documented in the California Natural Diversity Data Base within five miles of the project site, and preparing an update to Table 1 of the Biological Constraints Report. x Provide analysis of the potential for California red-legged frog to occupy the site, and avoidance and minimization measures, if warranted.
x Provide discussion on protections for migratory birds subject to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code, with recommended avoidance and minimization measures.

In addition to these recommendations to address biological resources, the peer review also recommended an update of the aquatic resources delineation (i.e. wetland delineation) subject to state

1 Monk & Associates. 2014. Biological Constraints Analysis, 570 Crespi Drive, City of Pacifica, San Mateo County, California (APNS: 022-162-310) (~1.7 Acres). Prepared for SC Properties, San Mateo CA. October 8. 2 Madrone Ecological Consulting. 2020. Peer review for the proposed 570 Crespi Drive, City of Pacifica, San Mateo County, California. Letter to Rod Stinson. Raney Planning and Management, Inc. April 4.

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
PO Box 1569
El Granada, CA 94018
(415) 254-4835
[email protected]
www.wood-biological.com

1.b
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 2
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
and federal jurisdiction. A separate report prepared by Wood Biological Consulting3 summarizes the findings of the recently completed delineation of aquatic resources for both the City and Murphy parcels.

Because the site is not located within the Coastal Zone, no Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA) subject to regulation under the City’s Local Coastal Plan were documented.

METHODS
Prior to conducting field data collection, Wood Biological Consulting (WBC) reviewed relevant background information, including:
x California Natural Diversity Database records of special-status plant, animal species and natural communities documented as occurring within five miles of the study area4 x U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (IPac) database for federally listed species and migratory birds5 x California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants6 x a sequence of aerial photo imagery on Google Earth
x Montara Mountain U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map, x a topographic survey map of the study area
x CEQA documentation of the City’s recently completed Wet Weather Equalization Basin7 , which
is adjacent to and dues west of the City parcel.

In addition, WBC conferred with Mr. Patrick Kobernus of Coast Ridge Ecology, who acted as the City’s biological compliance monitor during construction of the EQ basin in 2017-2018, during which he made direct observations of biological resources in the study area.

A reconnaissance-level survey for biological resources on both parcels was conducted by WBC senior ecologist Chris Rogers on July 19, 2020. This consisted of walking as much of the parcels as were physically accessible (dense and impenetrable willow scrub is limiting over a large portion of the study area), and making observations of habitats plant and wildlife species on and adjacent to the study area.

3 Wood Biological Consulting. 2020. Aquatic Resources Delineation, 540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica CA.

Technical Report prepared for BayWorks Construction, Inc. 4 California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). 2020. Version 5.89.14c. Query for the Montara Mountain and South San Francisco USGS 7.5’ Quadrangles. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Biogeographic Data Branch. Sacramento, California. Information dated August 1. 5 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2020. IPaC Trust Resource Report for 540 and 570 Crespi Drive.

Information for Planning and Conservation. Report generated July 18 at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ 6 California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2020. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-03

0.39). Query for the Montara Mountain and San Francisco South USGS 7.5’ Quadrangles. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Accessed July 18 at www.rareplants.cnps.org/ 7 Terraphase Engineering, Inc. 2016. Wet Weather Equalization Basin Project, Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study. Prepared for City of Pacifica. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=11510

1.b
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 3
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Botanical taxonomy and nomenclature conforms to The Jepson Manual8, except for recent revisions posted on the Jepson Online Interchange. Vegetation communities described herein conform to A Manual of California Vegetation9
.

Results of Database queries are included as attachments.

SETTING
The study area is located within the Santa Cruz Mountains subsection of the Central California Coast Section as described in the Ecological Subregions of California10 (USDA 1997). Vegetation in the study area is not representative of historic conditions, which likely consisted of coastal scrub, coastal dunes and coastal prairie. Currently, the northern portion of the study area supports several large Monterey cypress trees with an understory (groundcover) of predominantly non-native herbaceous vegetation.

The southern portion of the study area is slightly lower in elevation gradually becomes dominated by perennial wetland vegetation, such as willows, cattails and sedges.

The study area is situated within a residential and commercial neighborhood of Linda Mar, within the City of Pacifica. The study area ranges from approximately 15 ft elevation (relative to a City benchmark in Crespi Drive) at the northeastern end of the Murphy parcel, to about 9 ft at the southwestern end.

The climate is cool and temperate, characteristic of the San Francisco peninsula coastal region. The average annual high temperature in Pacifica is 64°F; the annual average low temperature is 49°F). About

29.5 inches of precipitation falls annually, with the majority of rainfall between October and April11.

VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE HABITATS
Vegetation within the study area consists of arroyo willow scrub, and emergent marsh, non-native annual grassland, and disturbed and ornamental habitats (figure 3). The following are descriptions of the vegetation types occurring within the wetland delineation study area.

Arroyo Willow Scrub
Willow scrub, dominated by arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis), covers the majority of the southern portion of the study area on both parcels (Figure 3). It also occurs in smaller stands along the western and eastern parcel boundaries. The willows form a dense and impenetrable thicket with few associated plant species. The willow scrub is almost entirely within the delineated wetland boundary; the exception is at the northern extent, where soils and hydrology near the edge of the willows failed to meet jurisdictional criteria.

8 Baldwin, B.G, D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Rosatti, and D.H. Wilken, editors. 2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California. Second edition. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. 1568 pp. Jepson eFlora available online at http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html 9 Sawyer, J.O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J.M. Evens. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation (2nd edition). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 1300 pp. Available online at http://vegetation.cnps.org/ 10 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1997. Ecological Subregions of California: sections and subsections descriptions. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region. https://web.archive.org/web/20080304224853/http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/projects/ecoregions/` 11 https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/pacifica/california/united-states/usca0822

1.b
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 4
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Emergent Marsh
Emergent marsh occupies a shallow topographic depression in the middle part of the study area (Figure 3), corresponding with the small area that used to have shallow ponded water in the winter. Seasonally high groundwater presumably persists, resulting in a predominance of emergent marsh plant species, such as Baltic rush (Juncus balticus), broadleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), Pacific silverweed (Potentilla anserina ssp. pacifica), and dotted smartweed (Persicaria punctata), among others. All of the emergent marsh is within the delineated wetland boundary.

Non-native Annual Grassland
Non-native grassland vegetation is present on the majority of the northern part of the study area, including the former residence site (Figure 3). Dominant plant species are annual grasses, such as bromes (Bromus diandrus, B. hordeaceus), slender oats (Avena barbata), hare barley (Hordeum murinum ssp. leporinum), and Italian ryegrass (Festuca perennis), with various non-native broad-leaf herbaceous species. A small portion of the non-native annual grassland is situated within the delineated wetland boundary, where it appears to be expanding down the topographic gradient in response to drier soil conditions following groundwater pumping during construction of the City’s Wet Weather Equalization Basin.

Disturbed and Ornamental
Disturbed habitat includes land cleared of vegetation or lands that have undergone frequent or extensive alteration to the extent that the site is dominated by non-native plant species. This type of habitat also includes areas subject to periodic vegetation management, such as mowing or brush clearing, which preclude the re-establishment of native vegetation communities. Within the study area, a parking area adjacent to Crespi Drive that is used by beach visitors, and a gravel staging area used during construction of the Wet Weather Equalization Basin are disturbed habitat (Figure 3).

Ornamental vegetation consists of maintained and unmaintained landscaping using native and nonnative plants. Within the study area, large Monterey cypress trees are remnants of landscaping associated with the former residence on the Murphy parcel. None of this area is within the delineated wetland boundary.

SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES
The laws comprising California’s legal framework and authority for plant species conservation include the federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), California Endangered Species Act (CESA), the Native Plant Protection Act (NPPA), and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Special-status plants include those listed as endangered, threatened, or rare or as candidates for listing by the USFWS and CDFW12, as

12 CDFW. 2020a. State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California. Biogeographic Data Branch, Natural Diversity Database. Quarterly publication. January 2. 13 pp. Available online at https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109390&inline

1.b
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 5
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
well as those with California Rare Plant Rank of 1 through 313. Additional definitions are given in Section 15380 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Special-status animal species include those listed as endangered, threatened, or rare or as candidates for listing by the USFWS and/or CDFW14. Other species having special status include the “special animals” listed in the CNDDB15 and avian species protected under the Bald Eagle Protection Act16 and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)17. The California Fish and Game Code provides protection for “fully protected birds18”, “fully protected mammals19”, “fully protected reptiles and amphibians20,” and “fully protected fish21.” Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations prohibits the take of amphibians22, reptiles23, and furbearers24 that are listed under CESA, MBTA, or are “fully protected.” Additional definitions are given in Section 15380 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Special-status natural communities are known to have limited distribution in the region, support specialstatus plant or wildlife species, or receive regulatory protection (i.e., waters of the United States, covered under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act [CWA] and/or waters of the State covered under Section 1600, et seq., of the California Fish and Game Code and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act [Water Code Sections 13000–14920]). The California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) has ranked a number of natural communities in terms of their significance and rarity25.

Tables 1 and 2 (plants and wildlife, respectively; see attachments) provide an update of the summary table included in the 2014 Biological Constraints Analysis report. Two species, salt marsh common yellowthroat and California red-legged frog, are evaluated in detail, below.

13 CDFW. 2020b. Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. Biogeographic Data Branch, Natural Diversity Database. Quarterly publication. January. 140 pp. Available online at https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109383&inline 14 CDFW. 2020c. State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California. Biogeographic Data Branch, Natural Diversity Database. July 17. 32 pp. Available online at https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109405&inline 15 CDFW. 2020d. Special Animals List. Natural Diversity Database. July. 120pp. Available online at https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109406&inline 16 16 USC 668, et seq.
17 16 USC 703-711, as amended
18 §3511
19 §4700
20 §5050
21 §5515
22 Chapter 5 §41
23 Chapter 5 §42
24 Chapter 5 §460
25 CDFW. 2019. California Sensitive Natural Communities. Biogeographic Data Branch, Natural Diversity Database.

November 8. 63 pp. Available online at https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=153609&inline

1.b
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 6
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
California red-legged frog
The 2014 Biological Constraints Analysis provided a detailed summary of California red-legged frog (CRLF), including its regulatory status (i.e., federal under the Federal Endangered Species Act, and state protection as a species of special concern), its breeding and dispersal habitat requirements, and environmental conditions that facilitate their movement. The analysis also cited the USFWS recovery Plan for California Red-Legged Frog that populations are “most likely to persist where multiple breeding areas are embedded within a matrix of habitats used for dispersal.” “The primary constituent elements for California red-legged frogs are aquatic and upland areas where suitable breeding and non-breeding habitat is interspersed throughout the landscape and is interconnected by unfragmented dispersal habitat”26.

The 2014 Biological Constraints Analysis did not, however provide an analysis of the potential for California red-legged frog to occupy the study area. Based on observations of the emergent wetlands in the study area in July 2020, and conversations with the biologist that monitored the construction of the City’s Wet-Weather Equalization Basin, the study area does provide suitable breeding or dispersal habitat for this species27. The only potentially aquatic feature is a small area within the emergent marsh vegetation that, in the past, ponded seasonally, but not consistently between and within years. In particular, permanent water for the minimum duration of 11-20 weeks required for larval development does not occur. Groundwater level on and around the study area appear to have been drawn down since construction of the Equalization Basin28.

The nearest population of CRLF is just 0.3 miles south of the study area, in San Pedro Creek, but is separated from by dense residential and commercial development, heavily traveled roads (including Highway 1), and frequently-visited Pacifica State Beach. There are no opportunities for CRLF to successfully disperse to the study area from San Pedro Creek. Similarly, populations of CRLF at Calera Creek (1 mile north of the study area; Occ. #504), Laguna Salada (1.9 miles north; Occ. #455), and in Vallemar (1.6 mile northeast; Occ. #918) are separated from the study area high ridges and other topographic barriers precluding line-of-sight migration, residential development and major roads, including Highway 1.

Therefore, the primary constituent elements in the Recovery Plan and cited above are not present.

Therefore, avoidance and minimization measures for CRLF are not warranted.

Saltmarsh common yellowthroat
Regulatory Status: FESA: none; CESA: none; CDFW: none (full species); USFWS: Bird of Conservation Concern; Global/State rarity ranking: G5T3/S3.

Description: Saltmarsh common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas sinuosa, hereafter SCY) is a California Species of Special Concern29, a Bird Species of Conservation concern30, and is protected under the

26 USFWS. 2002. Recovery Plan for the California Red-legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii). Region 1, Portland, Oregon. Viii+173 pp. May 28. 27 Patrick Kobernus, pers. comm. with C. Rogers. July 20, 2020. 28 Wood Biological Consulting. Ibid. 29 CDFW. 2020d. Ibid. 30 USFWS. 2020. Ibid.

1.b
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 7
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code31. Species assigned a ranking of S3 are considered vulnerable, at risk of extirpation in California due to fairly restricted range, relatively very few populations or occurrences, recent or widespread declines, threats, or other factors (CDFW, 2015c). Impacts to nesting saltmarsh common yellowthroat would be a significant adverse impact pursuant to the statutes and guidelines of CEQA; impacts should be addressed in environmental review documents. Impact avoidance measures are warranted, as outlined in the Recommendations section, below.

SCY is a small bird with an olive-brown back and rich yellow throat. This migratory bird ranges from Canada to southern Mexico and winters from the southern United States to the West Indies and Panama. A year-round resident of the San Francisco Bay Area, the SCY inhabits dense vegetation in wetlands, marshes, estuaries, prairies and riparian areas of San Francisco and San Pablo bays, and along the coastal areas of Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo counties32.

SCY requires thick, continuous cover down to the water surface for foraging and tall grasses, tule patches or willows for nesting, and forage on insects and spiders on the ground or within dense vegetation33. Nests are built near the base of dense vegetation, sometimes over water34. Breeding occurs from mid-March to late July, and pair typically double-brood22, 24.

Critical Habitat: The SCY is not listed under FESA; therefore, Critical Habitat has not been designated for the species.

Habitat Suitability and Probability of Occurrence: The 2014 Biological Constraints Analysis referenced the nearest known record (CNNDB Occ. #5) which is 1.8 miles north of the study area, and acknowledged the potential for the willows on the site to provide migratory habitat, but stated that it the study area provided nesting habitat due to its small area and urban setting. Field observations during the July 2020 survey agree with this, but also note the absence of proximity to water that is usually associated with SCY nests, which further supports the conclusion that the study area is not high quality nesting habitat for this species. SCY was observed in the study area during monitoring of the City’s wet-weather equalization basin in 2017-201835, although its nesting status was not determined.

Potential Project-Related Effects: Due to the marginal value of nesting habitat, the species may use the willow thicket within the study area for occasional foraging by periodic transitory individuals. Although the removal or pruning of willows on site is not proposed, disturbance from construction activities could result in direct and indirect impacts on breeding SCY and other migratory birds. Disturbance during the nesting season could result in the potential nest abandonment and mortality of young, which would be a

31 § 3503
32 Shuford, W.D. and T.G. Gardali. Eds. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern. A Ranked Assessment of Species, Subspecies, and Distinct Populations of Birds of Immediate Conservation Concern in California. Studies of Western Birds No. 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. 65 pp. Available on line at https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=83841 33 Guzy and Ritchison, 1999 34 Baicich and Harrison, 2005
35 Patrick Kobernus, pers. comm. with C. Rogers. July 20, 2020.

1.b
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 8
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
significant adverse effect pursuant to CEQA. Impact avoidance measures are warranted and are outlined in the Recommendations Section, below.

Migratory Birds and Raptors
In addition to special-status birds identified within five miles of the study area in the CNDDB, the USFWS IPaC database also identified 19 species of birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty act and Bald Eagle Protection Act, and are considered Bird Species of Conservation Concern. The IPaC database queery results are included in the Attachments. Of the 19 species listed, two raptors (bald eagle and golden eagle) are not expected to occur in the study area based on lack of suitable habitat. Eight species are not expected to occur in the study area because they are marine birds or shorebirds (black oystercatcher, black turnstone, Clark’s grebe, long-billed curlew, marbled godwit, short-billed dowitcher, whimbrel, and willet). Suitable nesting habitat for three species (Nuttall’s woodpecker, oak titmouse, and tri-colored blackbird) is not present in the study area. The remaining six species (Allen’s hummingbird, rufous hummingbird, song sparrow, spotted towhee, wrentit, and saltmarsh common yellowthroat) have low probability of nesting in the study area, but cannot be entirely ruled out.

Saltmarsh common yellowthroat is discussed in detail above. Impact avoidance measures are warranted and are outlined in the Recommendations Section, below.

Other Special-Status Species
In addition to the special-status species identified within five miles of the study area in the CNDDB query, several additional special-status species were identified in the USFWS and CNPS database searches. These database searches do not include site-specific observations, but instead document species that may occur nearby based on location or that have been observed within the same USGS quadrangle maps. Federal-listed species identified on the USFWS IPaC database for which no habitat is present in the study area includes: two mammals that are limited to marine or tidal saltmarsh habitats (southern sea otter and salt marsh harvest mouse); five bird species of marine, beach or tidal wetland habitats (Ridgway’s [=California] clapper rail, California least tern, marbled murrelet, short-tailed albatross, and western snowy plover; one reptile (green sea turtle); two fish (delta smelt, tidewater goby), and one plant (San Mateo woolly sunflower). The study area also is not within any critical habitat designated for federal listed species. The results of the USFWS IPaC query are provided in the attachments.

A query of the CNPS Inventory generated a list of 66 plant species that have been documented as occurring on the Montara Mountain and San Francisco South USGS quadrangle maps. All 30 plant species identified by CNDDB as occurring within five miles of the study area are included in the CNPS Inventory results as well. The remaining 36 plant species are not considered to have potential to occur in the study area due to lack of suitable habitat (such as chaparral, coastal dunes and scrubs, undisturbed or native grasslands, forest and woodlands, chaparral), absence of specialized soils (such as soils derived from serpentinite), distance from well-documented range of occurrence, or because they are perennial plants that would have been detected at the time of the survey. The results of the CNPS Inventory query are provided in the attachments.

1.b
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 9
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA

RECCOMENDATIONS
As described above, marginally suitable habitat is present on site for one special-status animal species, saltmarsh common yellowthroat. In addition, raptors and other migratory bird species protected under state and federal law, if nesting on or near the study area during construction, could be adversely affected by the project. These effects could be reduced to a less-than-significant level with incorporation of the following project design features included as part of the proposed project.

1. Special-Status and Migratory Birds
Although removal or pruning of willow trees and shrubs or other vegetation associated with the arroyo willow scrub and emergent marsh vegetation is not proposed, project construction of the project would temporarily increase noise and human activity levels nearby; these activities could result in indirect impacts on birds by disrupting breeding or causing abandonment of occupied nests. If present at the time of construction, such indirect impacts on special-status and migratory birds, including saltmarsh common yellowthroat, would be considered significant pursuant to CEQA.

The 2014 Biological Constraints Analysis recommended, and we concur, that a pre-construction survey be conducted prior to site grading or other construction work if this work occurs between February 1 and August 31 (the CDFW-designated nesting season for birds) to ensure that if saltmarsh common yellowthroat or any other migratory birds nest are nesting near the project site, they will not be affected by the proposed project. If an active nest is discovered, a protective buffer should be designated by a qualified biologist that is of sufficient size to keep the nesting birds, their eggs/young from being harmed by disturbance associated with implementation of a construction project.

To ensure compliance with protections for migratory birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Fish and Game Code, the measures outlined below should be implemented prior to the commencement of construction activities. With the incorporation of the measures outlined below, potential impacts would be reduced to a less-than-significant level pursuant to CEQA.

1. If construction activities are scheduled to occur outside of the breeding season (i.e., September 1 through January 31), no pre-construction surveys or other mitigation measures are necessary.

2. If construction activities are scheduled to occur during the breeding season (i.e., February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting bird survey should be conducted of the wharf structures, the identified work area and a buffer zone (see #3, below). The survey should be performed by a qualified biologist no more than two weeks prior to the initiation of work. If no nesting or breeding activity is observed, work may proceed without restrictions. To the extent allowed by access, all active nests identified within 76 m (250 ft) for raptors and 33 m (100 ft) for passerines should be mapped.

3. For any active nests found near the construction limits (76 m [250 ft] for raptors and 33 m [100 ft] for passerines), the project biologist should make a determination as to whether or not construction activities are likely to disrupt reproductive behavior. If it is determined that construction is unlikely to disrupt breeding behavior, construction may proceed. If it is determined that construction may disrupt breeding, the no-construction buffer zone should be expanded; avoidance is the only mitigation available. The ultimate size of the no-construction buffer zone may be adjusted by the project biologist based on the species involved, topography, lines of site between the work area and the nest, physical barriers, and the ambient level of

1.b
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 10
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
human activity. For raptors, the project biologist will contact CDFW and/or the USFWS Division of Migratory Bird Management for guidance regarding site evaluations and buffer adjustments.

If it is determined that construction activities are likely to disrupt raptor breeding, construction activities within the no-construction buffer zone may not proceed until the project biologist determines that the nest is long longer occupied.

4. If maintenance of a no-construction buffer zone is not practicable, active nests should be monitored by a qualified biologist to document breeding and rearing behavior of the adult birds.

If it is determined that construction activities might cause nest abandonment, work should cease until the project biologist determines that the nest is long longer occupied. For raptors, the CDFW and/or the USFWS Division of Migratory Bird Management should be contacted for guidance.

2. Temporary Sediment and Debris Barrier and Wildlife Exclusion Fence Prior to the start of construction, a temporary sediment and debris barrier will be installed on the southern limit of the construction area that slopes toward the arroyo willow and emergent wetland habitat (see Figure 3). The fence also will double as a wildlife exclusion fence during construction. The fence will consist of standard construction silt fence material with a height of 36 inches. The lower six inches of fence material will either be folded toward the construction side of the fence and weighted down with soil or sandbags, or backfilled in a trench; with both methods, the purpose is to completely contact the surface so that water and sediment will not flow under it, and wildlife will not enter the work area from the wetland.

1.b
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 11
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA

ATTACHMENTS
Figure 1. Study Area Location
Figure 2. Study Area Boundary
Figure 3. Habitat Map
Figure 4. Special-Status Plants within Five Miles of the Study Area Figure 5. Special-Status Animals within Five Miles of the Study Area Figure 6. Sensitive Natural Communities within Five Miles of the Study Area Table 1. Special-Status Plant Species within Five Miles of the Study Area Table 2. Special-Status Animal Species within Five Miles of the Study Area Database Search Results:
ƺ California Natural Diversity Data Base – Plants
ƺ California Natural Diversity Data Base – Animals
ƺ California Natural Diversity Data Base – Sensitive Natural Communities ƺ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) ƺ California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California

1.b
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 12
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 1. Study Area Location
1:9,028
0 0.075 0.15
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 km
August 7, 12020
ll
• h
Study Area Location ◊
~;
~¾,
~') Sources : Esri, HERE, Garmin , lntermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, _,. USGS, FAQ, NPS, NRCAN , GeoBase , IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordn~nce s'{/rv?y, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, BOB

1.b
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 13
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 2. Study Area Boundary
N
City parcel
Murphy parcel

1.b
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 14
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 3. Habitat Map
N Parcel Line Boundary Disturbed/Ornamental AWS-2 0.4S
A D Study Area
-Freshwater Emergent Marsh AWS-3 0.02
AWS-NON-JD 0.08
Vegetation Non-native Grassland NNG-1 0.39 0 50 100
Arroyo Willow Scrub Seasonal Wetland SW-1 0.06
Feet - FEM-1 0.24
Arroyo Willow Scrub (non-JD) 00-1 0.50
00-2 0.01

1.b
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 15
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 4. Special-Status Plants within Five Miles of the Study Area LEGEND
ALPE - Allium peninsulare ssp. franciscana
ARMO - Arctostaphylos montara
ARRE - Arctostaphylos regismontana
CEPA - Centromadia parryi ssp. parryi
CIAN - Cirsium andrewsii
COMU - Collinsia multicolor
DIOC - Dirca occidentalis
FRLI - Fritillaria liliacea
GRHI - Grindelia hirsutula var. maritima
HECO - Hemizonia congesta ssp. congesta
HOCU - Horkelia cuneata var. cuneata
HOCU - Horlelia marinensis
LACA - Lasthenia californica ssp.

LERO - Leptosiphon rosaceus
MAAR - Malacothamnus arcu us
POHi - Potentilla hickmanii
PLCH - Plagiobothrys char, sianus var. c.

SISC - Silene scouleri ss . scouleri
SIVE - Silene verecunda ssp. verecunda
TRFL - Triphysaria flori unda
COMU
CIAN
5-mile buffer/
0 6
N
0 0

1.25 1:144,448

2.5 2 4
August 11 , 2020
5 mi
8km
~
~
0 (
Sources : Esri, HERE, Garmin , lntermap, increment P Co~ GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN , GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster L, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI , Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, B DB
F

1.b
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 16
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 5. Special-Status Animals within Five Miles of the Study Area LEGEND
AB - American badger
ASSP - Alameda song sparrow
BFB - big free-tailed bat
CRLF - California red-legged frog
FM - fringed myotis
FYLF - foothill yellow-legged frog
HB - hoary bat
MER - merlin
NAP - North American porcupine
SFGS - San Francisco garter snake (occs.
protected throughout region)
SH - steelhead
SMCY - saltmarsh common yellowthroat
TBB - Townsend's big-eared bat
CRLF
5-mile buffer/
_\
N
1:144,448
0 1.25 2.5 5mi
0 2 4 8km
August 11 , 2020
• 1
Sources: Esri. HERE, Garmin, lnte~p,Jnf'ement P Corp., GEa.to, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN. Ge~ GII/, Kadaster NL, Orcir.tance Survey, Esri Japan, METI , Esri CniM:'(1-t?ng Kong), (c) RiieiiStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Co • nity, B DB

1.b
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 17
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 6. Sensitive Natural Communities within Five Miles of the Study Area LEGEND
NCS - Northern coastal saltmarsh
NMC - Northern maritime chaparral
SBG - Serpentine bunchgrass grassland
VNG - valley needlegrass grassland
PROJECTL0,CA111ON
◊
NCS-- ~
0 0

1.25 1:144,448

2.5 2 4
August 11 , 2020
5mi
8km Sources : Esri, HERE, Gannin , lnte(J.l)BP, increment P Corp., GEB.tO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, Geoffase , IGN, Kadaster NL, Orq_rnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI , Esri China (Hong Kong), (c)~~e!i!:;treetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, BOB

1.b
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 18
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Table 1. Special-status plants within five miles of the study area.

Scientific Name Flowering
Common Name Status' Period Habitat Area Locations Probability in Study Area
Blasda le's bent grass Fed : none May-July Coastal bluff scrub, Located 4.8 miles south Not present. No suitable Agrostis blasdalei State: none coastal dunes, coastal of study area, on habitat. Not observed CRPR: lB.2 prairie. coastal bluff in Moss during July 2020 site Beach (0cc. #60). vi sit.

Franciscan onion Fed: none May-June Woodland, grassland; Located 3.4 miles east Not present . No suitable Allium peninsulare State: none clay soils, often on of study area, near San habitat.

CRPR: lB.2 serpentine. Andreas La ke. 0cc.
#20).

Arctostaphylos montaraensis Fed : none Jan-March Maritime chaparral and Located 1.8-2.0 miles Not present. No suita ble Montara manzanita State: none coastal scrub. south to southeast of habitat. Not observed CRPR: lB.2 study area, on and during Ju ly 2020 site
around Montara visit.

Mountain (0cc. #2).

Kings Mountain manzanita Fed: none Jan-April Broadleafed upland Located 2.5 miles south Not present. No suitable Arctostaphy/os regismontana State: none forest, chapa rral, north of study area, on Peak habitat. Not observed CRPR: lB.2 coast coniferous forest. Mountain and Montara during Ju ly 2020 site Granitic or sandstone Mountain (0cc. #15). vi sit.
outcrops.

Centromodia parryi ssp. Fed: none May-Nov Coastal prairie; Located 0.3 mile south Not present. No suita ble parryi State: none meadows and seeps; from the study area habitat. Perennial plant, pappose tarplant CRPR: lB.2 marshes and swamps; (Occurrence #1). would have been seen if vernally wet grassland present. Not observed
(sometimes alkaline). during July 2020 site
visit.

Cirsium andrewsii Fed: none June-Ju ly Broadleafed upland Located 1.0 mile west Not present. No suita ble Franciscan thistle State: none forest; from the study area habitat. Would have CRPR: lB.2 coastal bluff scrub (0cc. #2). been evident if present; (sometimes not observed.
serpentinite).

Chorizanthe cuspidata var. Fed: none April-July Coastal bluff scrub; Located 1.9 miles north Very low. Sandy soils cuspidata State: none coastal from the project site present, but species not San Francisco Bay CRPR: lB.2 dunes; coastal prairie; (0cc. #2). observed during July spineflower coastal scrub (sandy) 2020 survey.

Collinsio multicolor Fed: none March- Closed-cone coniferous Located 1.0 mile west Not present. No suitable San Francisco collinsia State: none May forest; shady scru b from study area (0cc. habitat.

CRPR: lB.2 forest, coastal scrub. #13).

Dirca occidenta/is Fed : none Jan-April Chaparral; riparian, Located 2 miles SE from Not present. No suitable Western leatherwood State: none broadleaf, and study area (0cc. #53). habitat. Shrub/small CRPR: lB.2 coniferous tree, would have been
woodlands and forests; evident if present. Not
(mesic locations). observed.

Eriophyllum latilobum Fed: FE May-June Woodland, coastal Located 4.5 miles ESE, Not present. No suitable San Mateo woolly sunflower CA: CE scrub, lower montane from study area (0cc. habitat. Perennial shrub, CRPR: lB.l coniferous forest. #6), near San Andreas would have been evident Lake. if present. Not observed.

Fritillaria liliacea Fed: none Feb-April Coastal scrub, valley and Located 5 miles SE of Not present. No suitable fragrant fritillary State: none foothill grassland, study area (0cc. #37), soil or habitat.

CRPR: lB.2 coastal prairie, near Pilarcitos Lake.
woodland, often on
serpentine soil, usually
on clay soil.

Grinde/ia hirsutula var. Fed: none June-Sept Coastal scrub, coastal Located 2. 75 miles S of Not present. No suitable maritima State: none bluff scrub, valley and study area, near Gray habitat. Perennial plant, San Francisco gumplant CRPR: 3.2 foothill grassland. Whale Cove (0cc. #11). would have been evident if present. Not observed.

Hemizonia congesta ssp. Fed: none April-Nov Valley and foothill Historic collection Not present. No suitable congesta State: none grassland. (1909; 0 cc. #1). Entire habitat. Not observed. hayfield tarweed CRPR: lB.2 area is developed, likely
extirpated.

1.b
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 19
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Scientific Name Flowering
Common Name Status' Period Habitat Area Locations Probability In Study Area
Horkelia cuneata var. sericeo Fed : none Feb-July Coastal dunes (mesic), Historic locations near Not present. No suitable Kellogg's horkelia CA: none coastal scrub, coastal Colma (0cc. #30), and habitat; perennial plant, CRPR: lB.1 salt marshes, recent observations ~2 would have been streamsides. miles S of study area observed if present. near Montara Mtn.
(0cc. #60).

Horkelia marinensis Fed : none May-Sept Sandy flats and dunes Historic locations near Not present. No suita ble Point Reyes horkelia State: none near coast; coastal San Bruno (1962, 0cc. habitat; perennial plant, CRPR: lB.2 dunes, coastal prairie, #26) and Colma (1909, would have been coastal scrub. 0cc. #33). observed if present.

Hypogymnia schizidiata Fed: none n/a Chaparral, closed-cone Located 2 miles S of Not present. No suita ble Island rock lichen State: none coniferous forest, on study area near McNee habitat.

CRPR: lB.3 bark of hardwood shubs. Ranch St. Park and Peak Mtn. (Occs. #5, 6, 7)
Lasthenia californica ssp. Fed : none Jan-Nov Coastal bluff scrub, Located in coastal Not present. No suitable macrantha State: none coastal dunes, coastal prairie 3.5 miles S of habitat. perennial goldfields CRPR: lB.2 scrub. study area on bluffs in Moss Beach (0cc. #45)
and 1.5 miles SW on
Devil's Sl ide trail (0cc.
#46),
Leptasiphon croceus Fed: none April-May Only known from five Located on bluffs 4.8 Not present. No suitable Coast yellow leptosiphon State: none locations. Open, grassy miles south from the habitat.

CRPR: lB.1 areas, coastal bluffs, study area (0cc. #2).

Leptosiphon rosaceus Fed: none April-July Coastal bluff scrub, Historic collections Not present. No suita ble rose leptosiphon CA: CE coastal dunes, coastal (1903 and 1950), near habitat.

CRPR: lB.1 prairie. Montara Pt., 4.4 miles S
of study area. Possibly
extirpated.

Ma/acothamnus arcuatus Fed: none April-Sept Chaparral and Located 2.6 miles NE of Not present. No suitable arcuate bush mallow State: none woodland. study area (0cc. #20) habitat. Perennial shrub, CRPR: lB.2 near San Bruno, and 4.2 would have been evident miles SE (0cc. #32) near if present. Not observed.

Pilarcitos Lake
(historical occurrence,
1902).

Monolopia gracilens Fed: none March-July Grassy openings in Historic collection Not present. No suitable woodland monolopia State: none chaparral, valley and (1949) near Pilarcitos habitat.

CRPR: lB.2 foothill grassland, Lake, 5 miles SE of
cismontane woodland, study area (0cc. #40).
broadleafed upland
forest, North Coast
coniferous forest.

Pentachaeta bel/idiflora Fed : FE March- Valley and foothill Near San Skyline Not present. No suitable white-rayed pentachaeta CA: CE May grassland, woodland. Boulevard, Andreas habitat.

CRPR: 18.1 Lake, 4.3 miles E of
study area (0cc. #2).

Presumed extirpated.

Plagiabothrys chorisianus Fed: none March- Chaparral, coastal scrub, Located on Sweeney Not present. No suitable var. chorisianus State: none June coastal prairie. Ridge 3 miles E of study habitat.

Choris's popcorn flower CRPR: lB.2 area (0cc. #10) and 2.5 miles NE (0cc. #9), and
in Montara, 3.7 miles S
(0cc. #43).

Potentilla hickmanii Fed: FE April-Aug Coastal bluff scrub, Located north of Not present. No suita ble Hickman's cinquefoil CA: CE closed-cone coniferous Montara, 3 miles S of habitat; perennial plant, CRPR: lB.1 forest, meadows and study area (0cc. #6). would have been seeps (vernally mesic), observed if present.
freshwater marshes.

Silene scauleri ssp. scouleri Fed: none May-Aug Coastal bluff scrub, Nearest population is 1 Not present. No suita ble simple campion State: none coastal prairie, valley mile SW of study area, habitat; perennial plant, CRPR: 2B.2 and foothill grassland. on Pedro Point (0cc. would have been

1.b
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 20
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA

Scientific Name
Common Name
Silene verecunda ssp.
verecunda
San Francisco campion
Trifolium omoenum
showy Indian clover
Triphysario floribundo
San Francisco owl' s clover
Triquetrella californica
California triquetrella moss
'status
Federal:

FE - Federal Endangered
FT - Federal Threatened
State:

CE - California Endangered
Status'
Fed : none
CA: none
CRPR: 18.2
Fed: FE
State: none
CRPR: 1B.1
Fed : none
CA: none
CRPR: 18.2
Fed : none
State: none
CRPR: 1B.2
CSC - California Species of Special Concern
Flowering
Period
March-July
April-June
April-June
n/a
Habitat Area Locations Probability in Study
Area
#2) observed if present.

Coastal bluff scrub, Nearest population is Not present. No suitable chaparral, coastal 1.9 miles SW of study habitat; perennial plant, prairie, coastal scrub, area along Devil's Slide would have been valley and foothill trail. observed if present.
grassland.

Valley and foothill Historic record (1907) Not present. No suitable grassland, coastal bluff near Colma, location habitat.
scrub. Sometimes on not specific. Likely
serpentine soil, extirpated.

Coastal prairie, coastal Several historic records; Not present. No suitable scrub, valley and foothill nearest on Skyline habitat.
grassland, usually on Boulevard 3.5 miles NE
serpentine soil of study area (0cc. #49)
Coastal bluff scrub, Located 2 miles E of Not present. No suitable coastal scrub, study area (0cc. #8). habitat.
grasslands, on gravel or
thin soil.

CRPR (California Rare Plant Rank):

Rank lA - Presumed extinct in California
Rank 1B - Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere Rank lB.1- Seriously endangered in California (over 80% occurrences threatened/
high degree and immediacy of threat)
Rank 1B.2 - Fairly endangered in California (20-80% occurrences threatened) Rank 18.3 - Not very endangered in Cal ifornia (<20% of occurrences threatened orno
current threats known)
Rank 2 - Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere
Rank 2A - Extirpated in California, common elsewhere
Rank 2B.1 - Seriously endangered in California, but more common elsewhere Rank 2B.2 - Fairly endangered in California, but more common elsewhere Rank 2B.3 - Not very endangered in California, but more common elsewhere Rank 3 - Plants about which we need more information (Review List) Rank 3.1 - Plants about which we need more information (Review List) Seriously endangered in California
Rank 3.2 - Plants about which we need more information (Review List) Fairly endangered in Cal ifornia
Rank 4 - Plants of limited distribution - a watch list

1.b
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 21
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Table 2. Special-status wildlife within five miles of the study area.

Scientific Name
Common Name Status' Habitat Proximity to Study Area Probability In Study Area

INSECTS
Monarch butterfly' Fed: none Winters in tall trees along Nearest overwintering site None. Migration and Danaus plexippus State: none the coast. Prefers is Martini Creek near overwintering roosts are Other: S eucalyptus, Monterey pine Montara State Beach, ~3 highly visible and welland Monterey cypress. miles SSW of study area documented. Not present in (data from suppressed study area.
records in CNDDB).

San Bruno elfin butterfly' Fed: FE Coastal mountainous areas Located 1.9 miles south of None. No suitable habitat on Callaphrys massii bayensis State: none with grassy ground cover, the study area (occ. 1114). or adjacent to study area.

Other: none mainly in the vicinity of San Host plant not present.

Bruno Mt., San Mateo Co.,
on steep north-facing slopes
within the fog belt. Larval
host plant is Sedum
spathulifolium.

Myrtle's silverspot butterfly' Fed: FE Coastal terrace prairie, Nearest record mile north None. No suitable habitat Speyeria zerene myrtleoe State: none coastal bluff scrub, and non- from study area (0cc. 1113). present on or adjacent to Other: none native grassland in Marin study area. Host plant not and SW Sonoma Counties. present.

Extirpated from San Mateo
County. Larval food plant is
Viola adunca.

FISH
Steel head - Central California Fed: FT From Russian River south to Located 0.3 mile S of study None. No suitable habitat Coast DPS - Population 8 State: none Sequel Creek, Pajaro River. area in San Pedro Creek present.

Other: none Also in SF and San Pablo Bay {0cc. 1112)
basins. Spawn in clear, cool
well-oxygenated streams
greater than 18 cm deep.

AM PHIBIANS
Foothill yellow-legged frog Fed: FE Partly-shaded, shallow Historic and non-specific No suitable habitat present.

Rana boy/ii State: streams and riffles with a record, near San Andreas Other: rocky substrate in a variety Lake (0cc. 112133), of habitats. considered extirpated.

California red-legged frog Fed: FT Lowlands and foothi lls in Nearest record 0.3 mile S None. Wetland in study area Rana draytonii State: SSC pools and streams, usually of study area in San Pedro dries in late spring or early Other: with emergent wetland Creek (0cc. 11652). summer (no significant vegetation. Requires 11-20 ponding in 2020), therefore
weeks of permanent water not suitable breeding
for larval development. habitat. This urban infill site is isolated from nearest
population, with no
migration potential.

REPTILES
San Francisco garter snake Fed: FE Freshwater marshes, ponds Closest record is 1 mile None. Seasonal wetland on Thamnophis sirtalis tetrotaenia State: CE and slow-moving streams north of the study area and immediately adjacent to Other: none on the SF peninsula. Prefers (0cc. 1145, CNDDB project site dries late in dense cover and water suppressed records). Spring or
depths of at least 1 ft. Locations in Pacifica area early summer, and is isolated are all sites that support from extant suitable habitats aquatic habitats that by surrounding
remain inundated. development.

1.b
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Wood Biological Consulting
Biological Constraints Analysis - Updated 22
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Scientific Name
Common Name
BIRDS
Merlin
Falco columbarius
Saltmarsh common
yellowthroat
Geothlypis trichas sinuosa
Alameda song sparrow
Melospiza melodia pusi/lula

MAMMALS
American badger
Taxidea taxus
North American porcupine
Erethizon dorsatum
Townsend's big-eared bat
Corynorhinus tawnsendii
Hoary bat
Lasiurus cinereus
Fringed myotis
Myotis thysanodes
Big free-tailed bat
Nyctinomops macrotis
1 Status
Federal:

FE - Federal Endangered
FT - Federal Threatened
Status'
Fed: none
State: WL
Other: LC
Fed : none
State: SSC
Other: BCC
Fed: none
State: SSC
Other: BCC
Fed : none
State: none
Other: LC
Fed: none
State: none
Other: LC
Fed: none
State: SSC
Other: LC
Fed: none
State: SSC
Other: LC
Fed: none
State: none
Other: LC
Fed: none
State: CSC
Other: LC
2 Included in 2014 Biological Constraints
Analysis, but not within 5 miles of study area
according to CNDDB 2020.

Habitat
Seacoast, tidal estuaries,
open woodlands,
savannahs, edges of
grasslands and deserts,
farms and ranches. Clumps
of trees or windbreaks are
required for roosting in
open country.

Resident of freshwater and
salt water marshes in the SF
Bay region . Requires dense,
continuous cover for
foraging and tall grasses,
tules, or willows for nesting.

Resident of salt marshes
bordering San Francisco
Bay.

Scrub, forest, and
herbaceous habitats, with
friable soils.

Forest, woodland,
occasionally grassland and
scrub.

Roosts in the open, hanging
from walls and ceilings.

Roosting sites limiting.

Extremely sensitive to
human disturbance.

Roosts in dense foliage in
medium to large trees.

Preferred sites are hidden
from above, with few
branches below, and have
ground cover of low
reflectivity.

Uses caves, mines, buildings
or crevices for maternity
colonies and roosts.

Roosts in crevices in rocky
outcrops and cliffs, although
there is some,
documentation of roosts in
buildings, caves, and tree
cavities.

State:

CE - California Endangered
CT - California Threatened
CR - California Rare
CC - California Candidate
Proximity to Study Area
Record for this species
located 1.2 miles
northeast from the project
site {0cc. #12).

Record for this species
located 1.8 mile north
from the project site (0cc.
#5).

Two historic records (1940,
0cc. #23; and 1947, 0cc.
#32) from near Colma.

One record from 1948
near Peak Mtn., 2.6 miles
SSE {0cc. #127).

One record from 1972
{0cc. #430) in Daly City.

Site since developed.

Nearest record is 4 miles
east of study area (0cc.
#431). Building since
demolished.

Record for this species
located 2 miles north from
the project site {0cc.
#120).

Nearest record is near
Crystal Springs Reservoir
{0cc. #44).

One record for this species
from 1984 located 1 mile
northwest from the
project site {0cc. #20).

CSC - California Species of Special Concern
FP - Fully Protected
WL - Watch List. Nat protected pursuant to CEQA
Probability In Study Area
None. Does not nest in
California. Migrating birds
would not be affected by
proposed project.

Observed during 2017-2018.

Willow scrub in study area
could provide migration
habitat, but is only a small,
limited area of suitable
habitat in an urban setting.

Not expected to support
nesting birds (see text).

No suitable habitat present.

No suitable habitat.

No suitable habitat in study
area, or connectivity to
habitat.

No suitable habitat present.

Large cypress trees in study
area are marginally suitable
for day roosting, but not as
maternal roosting habitat.

Not expected to be
impacted.

No suitable habitat present.

None. No rocky habitat for
roosting which is the primary
roosting habitat.

Other:

LC - IUCN Least Concern
BCC - USFWS Bird species of
Conservation Concern
S - USFWS Sensitive

1.b
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

APPENDIX D

1.b
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Updated Delineation 1
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
DATE: May 31, 2024
TO: Brendan Murphy, Eamon Murphy
BayWorks Construction, Inc.

P.O. Box 301
San Mateo, CA 94401
FROM: Chris Rogers
SUBJECT: Updated Delineation of Potentially Jurisdictional Aquatic Resources and Effects Analysis 570 Crespi Avenue, Pacifica CA
This memorandum is an updated summary of potentially jurisdictional aquatic resources (including wetlands and other waters of the United States and waters of the State of California) for the proposed development of two parcels located at 540 and 570 Crespi Drive, in Pacifica, CA (APN 022-162-420 and 022- 162-310).The parcels are owned by the City of Pacifica and by Brendan and Eamon Murphy, respectively, and are referred to here as the City parcel and the Murphy parcel (see Figures 1 and 2). The two parcels, totaling approximately 1.85 acres, are under consideration for being merged and developed by the Murphys with residential uses (the residential project).

This report was prepared at the request of the City of Pacifica Planning Department and consolidates information that has been developed over a period of several years of environmental review and provided to the City in several memoranda. The City also requested that the wetlands and other water be reevaluated to determine if their extent had changed during the preceding several years.

Wood Biological Consulting (WBC) prepared a wetland delineation report in 20201 , in response to a peer
review of the 2014 Biological Constraints Analysis2
, which recommended an update of the “aquatic resource delineation” (i.e., delineation of wetlands and other waters), and to include the City parcel in the delineation. The 2020 delineation report informed the layout of proposed development for the properties in relation to the norther edge of the willow and marsh vegetation in the central portion of the two parcels. Revisions to certain elements of the proposed project prompted additional and more detailed analysis of potentially jurisdictional areas in the southern portion of the two parcels. Additional City-owned property that will receive improvements as part of the proposed project also is included in this report. At the request of the City, an updated report on potentially jurisdictional wetlands and other waters and an analysis of effects of the project on those resources was submitted on October 27, 2023. 1 Wood Biological Consulting. 2020. Delineation of Potentially Jurisdictional Wetlands and Other Waters, 570 Crespi Avenue, Pacifica, CA. Prepared for Brendan and Eamon Murphy. Oct. 6. 2 Monk & Associates. 2014. Biological Constraints Analysis, 570 Crespi Drive, City of Pacifica, San Mateo County, California (APNS: 022-162-310) (~1.7 Acres). Prepared for SC Properties, San Mateo CA. October 8.

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
PO Box 1569
El Granada, CA 94018
(415) 254-4835
[email protected]
www.wood-biological.com

1.b
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 2
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
This memorandum and the methods employed to identify the wetland boundary are consistent with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District standards for identifying federal jurisdictional waters of the U.S.3
, and state guidance for identifying waters of the state4.

METHODS
The study area for this assessment consists of the two parcels, the City parcel and the Murphy parcel, and an additional portion of the adjacent Community Center where improvements would be made as part of the project (Figure 2).

Prior to conducting field data collection, WBC reviewed relevant background information, including the 2014 biological report, the 2020 peer view, a sequence of aerial photo imagery on Google Earth, National Wetlands Inventory5
, California Aquatic Resource Inventory6, Soil Conservation Service7, Montara Mountain U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map, a topographic survey map of the parcels, and environmental review documents related to the City’s recently completed Wet Weather Equalization Basin8
, which is adjacent to and due west of the City parcel.

Aquatic resources on both parcels were assessed in the field by WBC senior ecologist Chris Rogers on July 19, 2020. WBC conducted an additional assessment on March 31 and April 4, 2022, which focused on reevaluating the wetland boundary in the southern portion of the site in support of a design modification regarding an emergency drain riser. At the City’s request, the entire site was reassessed on April 5, 2023 to determine whether the wetland boundary had changed in the intervening period, which included the exceptionally wet winter of 2022-2023. The field data collection consisted of observations of wetland and upland vegetation, soil characteristics, and evidence of hydrology in relation to topography. The delineation used the “Routine Determination Method” as described in the 1987 USACE of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual9
, in conjunction with the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland 3 Department of the Army, San Francisco District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (revised April 2016). Information Requested for Verification of Corps Jurisdictions. https://www.spn.usace.army.mil/Portals/68/docs/regulatory/2%20-%20Info%20Req.pdf. 4 California Water Boards. 2021. State Policy for Water Quality Control: State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State. State Water Resources Control Board. Adopted April 2, 2019; Revised April 6, 2021. Available online at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/cwa401/docs/2021/procedures.pdf 5 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. National Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Mapper. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html 6
San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI). 2017. California Aquatic Resource Inventory (CARI), version 0.3. Accessed Sept 11, 2020. https://www.sfei.org/data/california-aquatic-resource-inventory-cari-version-03-gisdata#sthash.iognRp02.dpbs. 7 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2014. Custom Soil Resource Report for, San Mateo County, Eastern Part, and San Francisco County, California: 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica. Natural Resource Conservation Service; Web Soil Survey. Report printed July 28. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ (see Attachments) 8 Terraphase Engineering, Inc. 2016. Wet Weather Equalization Basin Project, Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study. Prepared for City of Pacifica. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=11510 9 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S.

Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. January. 100 pp. Available online at http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/organizations/cespk-co/regulatory/pdf/delineation_manual.pdf

1.b
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 3
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys and Coasts Region (Version 2.0)10, hereafter called the “WVMC Supplement.” Aquatic resources were classified using commonly accepted habitat types. Wetland plant indicator status is referenced to the 2020 WVMC Regional Wetland Plant list11.

In the northern part of the project parcels, vegetation, soil and hydrology were documented at nine locations on three transects across the wetland-upland boundary. Sample points were mapped in the field using a Trimble Geo XT 6000, with differential correction. Based on these data, a wetland boundary (subject to verification by the USACE) was mapped on an aerial photograph. This preliminary delineation includes wetlands that meet the federal three-parameter definition and other waters of the United States.

Three positive wetland parameters must normally be present for an area to be considered a wetland:
1) dominance of wetland vegetation, 2) presence of hydric soils, and 3) presence of wetland hydrology.

The extent of wetlands near the southern boundary of the City and Murphy parcels was re-evaluated in March and April, 2022, in relation to the location of a proposed emergency overflow riser (i.e., drain inlet), and the City’s drainage easement located along the southern boundary of the project site. The location of the inlet was shown on the Murphy’s prior project Tentative Map application, Sheet TM-3 (dated 1/21/21). However, that location is within a wetland; installation of the riser within the wetland could trigger the need for regulatory permits from federal and state regulatory agencies.

The 2020 wetland delineation map and report12, completed prior to the original project submittal, focused on the location and extent of aquatic resources toward the northern portion of the study area, where the objective was to avoid impacts to aquatic resources resulting from the proposed residential development project. In the southern portion of the project, which is dominated by dense and often impenetrable willow scrub, the extent of wetlands was extrapolated based on the presence of willow wetlands elsewhere on the site, and on the neighboring City’s Community Center and Wet-Weather Equalization Basin parcel.

An alternative location for the riser was proposed by the applicant close to the southwest corner of the study area, and shown on revised plans submitted to the City (Sheet A1.14, dated 04/08/22). WBC delineated this area on March 31 and April 4, 2022, to more precisely determine the boundary between wetland and non-wetland areas. Data were recorded or three sample locations, SP-1, SP-2 and SP-3 and summarized in a letter to the City13.

Botanical taxonomy and nomenclature conform to The Jepson Manual14 (Baldwin et al. 2012), except for recent revisions posted on the Jepson Online Interchange. 10 United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, Coast Region (Version 2.0); Final Report. ERDC/EL TR-08-28.

U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. Available online at https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p266001coll1/id/7646 11 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2020. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.5. http://wetlandplants.usace.army.mil/ 12 Wood Biological Consulting. 2020. Ibid. 13 Wood Biological Consulting. 2022. 570 Crespi Drive Development Proposal, Clarification of Wetland Boundary in Southern Part of Project Site. Letter to Christian Murdock, City of Pacifica. April 8. 14 Baldwin, B.G, D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Rosatti, and D.H. Wilken, editors. 2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California. Second edition. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. 1568 pp. Jepson eFlora available online at http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html

1.b
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 4
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA

REGULATORY DEFINITIONS
Wetlands and other waters (e.g., rivers, streams, and natural ponds) are a subset of waters of the U.S. and receive protection under Section 404 of the CWA. The USACE has primary federal responsibility for administering regulations that concern waters of the U.S. and requires a permit if a project proposes placement of structures within navigable waters and/or alteration of waters of the U.S. The USEPA has the ultimate authority under the CWA and can veto the USACE’s issuance of a permit to fill jurisdictional waters of the U.S.

Waters of the State are inclusive of waters of the U.S. under Section 401 of the federal CWA, but also are also regulated more broadly by the Regional Water Quality Control Boards under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Under this law, the RWQCB protects water quality and the beneficial uses of both surface and ground water. Waters regulated under Porter-Cologne include isolated waters that are not regulated by the USACE. Discharges of fill (e.g., waste) to waters of the State must file a Report of Waste Discharge and receive either waste discharge requirements (WDRs) or a waiver to WDRs before beginning the discharge.

Many of the terms used throughout this report have specific meanings with respect to the delineation of Waters of the U.S. These terms are defined below:

Hydric Soil: A soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. Hydric soils are often characterized by redoximorphic features (such as redox concentrations, formerly known as mottles), which form by the reduction, translocation, and/or oxidation of iron and manganese oxides. Hydric soils may lack hydric indicators for a number of reasons. In such cases the same standard used to determine wetland hydrology when indicators are lacking can be used (USDA NRCS 2010).

Hydrophytic Vegetation: Hydrophytic vegetation is defined as plant life that occurs in areas where the frequency and duration of inundation or soil saturation produce permanently or periodically saturated soils of sufficient duration to exert a controlling influence on the plant species present. Emphasis is placed on the assemblage of plant species that exert a controlling influence on the character of the plant community, rather than on a single indicator species (i.e., there must be a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation present to satisfy this wetland parameter).

Other Waters: The term “other waters of the United States” includes water bodies, such as rivers and streams that may not meet the full criteria for wetlands designation but that do exhibit evidence of an OHWM and are navigable or hydrologically connected to a navigable water body. Under the latest regulatory guidance, all such waters must have a significant nexus to a navigable water body to be considered jurisdictional by the USACE.

Special Aquatic Sites: Special aquatic sites are geographic areas, large or small, possessing special ecological characteristics of productivity, habitat, wildlife protection, or other important and easily disrupted ecological values. These areas are generally recognized as significantly influencing or positively contributing to the general overall environmental health or vitality of the entire ecosystem of a region. Special aquatic sites include sanctuaries, refuges, wetlands, vernal pools, coral reefs and mudflats among others.

1.b
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 5
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Study Area: For the purposes of this report, the study area, refers to the entire area surveyed or hereby evaluated, which is inclusive of the City parcel and the Murphy parcel, and a small area adjacent to the Community Center.

Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNW): TNWs are all navigable waters that are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. TNWs also include all waters that are ‘navigable-in-fact,’ defined through case law to include those water bodies that are both navigable and have the capacity to be used for the purposes of commerce, whether or not they have ever been used for such a purpose.

Waters of the United States: The definition of "waters of the United States” (33 CFR § 328.3; 40 CFR § 120.2) is listed below15. Relevant sections to the study area are at (a)(4) “adjacent wetlands”, and (b)(8), swales with low volume, infrequent, or short duration flow. (a) Waters of the United States means:
(1) Waters which are:
(i) Currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; (ii) The territorial seas; or
(iii) Interstate waters;
(2) Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this definition, other than impoundments of waters identified under paragraph (a)(5) of this section; (3) Tributaries of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section that are relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water; (4) Wetlands adjacent to the following waters:
(i) Waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; or (ii) Relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water identified in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section and with a continuous surface connection to those waters; (5) Intrastate lakes and ponds not identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section that are relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water with a continuous surface connection to the waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(3) of this section. (b) The following are not “waters of the United States” even where they otherwise meet the terms of paragraphs (a)(2) through (5) of this section:
15 Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers (33CFR Part 328) and Environmental Protection Agency (40CFR Part 120), 2023. Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States; Conforming. Fed. Reg. 88(173): 61964-61969. Sept 8, 2023.

1.b
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 6
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
(1) Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons, designed to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act; (2) Prior converted cropland designated by the Secretary of Agriculture. The exclusion would cease upon a change of use, which means that the area is no longer available for the production of agricultural commodities. Notwithstanding the determination of an area's status as prior converted cropland by any other Federal agency, for the purposes of the Clean Water Act, the final authority regarding Clean Water Act jurisdiction remains with EPA; (3) Ditches (including roadside ditches) excavated wholly in and draining only dry land and that do not carry a relatively permanent flow of water;
(4) Artificially irrigated areas that would revert to dry land if the irrigation ceased; (5) Artificial lakes or ponds created by excavating or diking dry land to collect and retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering, irrigation, settling basins, or rice growing.
(6) Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of water created by excavating or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons; (7) Waterfilled depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining fill, sand, or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States; and
(8) Swales and erosional features (e.g., gullies, small washes) characterized by low volume, infrequent, or short duration flow. (c) In this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) Wetlands means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.
(2) Adjacent means having a continuous surface connection. (3) High tide line means the line of intersection of the land with the water's surface at the maximum height reached by a rising tide. The high tide line may be determined, in the absence of actual data, by a line of oil or scum along shore objects, a more or less continuous deposit of fine shell or debris on the foreshore or berm, other physical markings or characteristics, vegetation lines, tidal gages, or other suitable means that delineate the general height reached by a rising tide. The line encompasses spring high tides and other high tides that occur with periodic frequency but does not include storm surges in which there is a departure from the normal or predicted reach of the tide due to the piling up of water against a coast by strong winds such as those accompanying a hurricane or other intense storm.

1.b
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 7
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
(4) Ordinary high water mark means that line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas. (5) Tidal waters means those waters that rise and fall in a predictable and measurable rhythm or cycle due to the gravitational pulls of the moon and sun. Tidal waters end where the rise and fall of the water surface can no longer be practically measured in a predictable rhythm due to masking by hydrologic, wind, or other effects.

Wetland Hydrology: This term encompasses all hydrologic characteristics of areas that are periodically inundated or have soils saturated to the surface at some time during the growing season. These include both riverine and non-riverine hydrology indicators, such as sediment deposits, drift lines, and oxidized rhizospheres along living roots in the upper 12 inches of the soil. In the Arid West, hydrologic indicators may be absent in any given year due to annual variability in precipitation and in times of drought. The Arid West Supplement (USACE 2008) cites a technical standard that can be used for disturbed or problematic sites that support wetland vegetation and soils but where wetland hydrology is not apparent. This standard calls for 14 or more consecutive days of flooding, ponding, or saturation.

Wetland Indicator Status: Refers to the probability that a plant will occur in a wetland or not. Indicator status categories are as follows:
x Obligate (OBL): almost always occurs in wetlands
x Facultative wetland (FACW): usually occurs in wetlands, sometimes may occur in uplands x Facultative (FAC): equally likely to occur in wetlands or uplands x Facultative upland (FACU): usually occurs in uplands but may occasionally occur in wetlands x Obligate upland (UPL): almost never occurs in wetlands x No indicator (NI): no indicator assigned due to lack of information

SETTING
The wetland delineation study area is located within the Santa Cruz Mountains subsection of the Central California Coast Section as described in the Ecological Subregions of California16 (USDA 1997). Vegetation in the study area is not representative of historic conditions, which likely consisted of coastal scrub, coastal dunes and coastal prairie. Currently, the northern portion of the study area supports several large Monterey cypress trees with an understory (groundcover) of predominantly non-native herbaceous vegetation. The southern portion of the study area is slightly lower in elevation and gradually becomes dominated by perennial wetland vegetation, such as willows, cattails and sedges.

The study area is situated within a residential and commercial neighborhood of Linda Mar, within the City of Pacifica (coordinates: 37.597992°, -122.499359°). The 1.85-acre study area ranges from approximately 15 ft elevation (relative to a City benchmark in Crespi Drive) at the northeastern end of the Murphy parcel, to about 9 ft at the southwestern end. The climate is cool and temperate, characteristic of the San Francisco Peninsula coastal region. The average annual high temperature in Pacifica is 64°F; the annual average 16 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1997. Ecological Subregions of California: sections and subsections descriptions. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region. https://web.archive.org/web/20080304224853/http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/projects/ecoregions/`

1.b
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 8
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
low temperature is 49°F). About 29.5 inches of precipitation falls annually, with most of the rainfall between October and April17; see also the WETS tables in the attachments.

VEGETATION
Vegetation within the study area consists of arroyo willow scrub, emergent marsh, non-native annual grassland, and disturbed and ornamental habitats. The following are descriptions of the vegetation types occurring within the wetland delineation study area. The composition and extent of the vegetation types was re-evaluated on April 5, 2023, to assess whether substantial changes occurred that could be attributed to the wetter-than-average winter of 2022-2023. Table 1 is a list of all plants observed in the study area, updated as of April, 2023.

Arroyo Willow Scrub
Willow scrub, dominated by arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis), covers most of the southern portion of the study area on both parcels (Figure 3). It also occurs in smaller stands along the western and eastern parcel boundaries. The willows form a dense and impenetrable thicket with few associated plant species. The willow scrub is almost entirely within the delineated wetland boundary and is represented by wetland delineation sample point 3B (see wetland delineation data forms in the attachments); the exception is at the northern extent, where soils and hydrology near the edge of the willows failed to meet wetland criteria (sample points 3C). Additionally, at the far southern end of the parcels, the topography rises slightly because of fill placed for the backyards of homes on Anza Drive. Although willow canopy extends to the parcel boundary, the willows are rooted in the lower part of the topographic depression, away from the fence line. In the southwestern corner, the topography rises more abruptly toward the berm that separates the project parcels from the Community center parking lot and rain garden. Non-native ngaio tree (Myoporum laetum), and upland species, replaces willow where the ground surface level is higher.

During the re-evaluation of the wetland boundaries in April, 2023, we confirmed that the extent and composition of arroyo willow scrub was unchanged from the previous delineation maps.

Emergent Marsh
Emergent marsh occupies a shallow topographic depression in the middle part of the study area (Figure 3), corresponding with the area with shallow ponded water in the winter. Seasonally high groundwater presumably persists, resulting in a predominance of emergent marsh plant species, such as Baltic rush (Juncus balticus), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia), Pacific silverweed (Potentilla anserina ssp. pacifica), and dotted smartweed (Persicaria punctata), among others. All of the emergent marsh is within the delineated wetland boundary (sample point 2A).

During the re-evaluation of the wetland boundaries in April, 2023, we confirmed that the extent and composition of emergent marsh was unchanged from the original 2020 delineation. Although water level in the southern part of the parcels was higher in the immediate aftermath of significant rain events in storms in the winter of 2022-2023, it did not persist long enough to result in establishment of emergent wetland plants in the transitional area that is mapped as seasonal wetland.

Seasonal Wetland
Seasonal wetland occupies a narrow band that is transitional between the upland and emergent marsh and arroyo willow scrub (Figure 3). The vegetation includes species that occupy the margins of the 17 https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/pacifica/california/united-states/usca0822

1.b
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 9
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
emergent marsh, but also some of the non-native annual grassland species as well. Sample point 1A is located near the boundary between seasonal wetland and non-native grassland.

During the re-evaluation of the wetland boundaries in April, 2023, the extent and composition of seasonal wetland was unchanged from the original 2020 delineation. Although water level in the southern part of the parcels was higher in the immediate aftermath of significant rain events in storms in the winter of 2022-2023, it did not persist long enough to convert this area to emergent marsh through establishment of obligate wetland plants.

Non-native Annual Grassland
Non-native grassland vegetation is present on the majority of the northern part of the study area, including the former residence site (Figure 3). Dominant plant species are annual grasses, such as bromes (Bromus diandrus, B. hordeaceus), slender oats (Avena barbata), hare barley (Hordeum murinum ssp. leporinum), velvet grass (Holcus lanatus), and Italian ryegrass (Festuca perennis), with various non-native broad-leaf herbaceous species. Sample points 1B, 1C, 2B, and 2C are representative of this vegetation type. Non-native annual grassland plant species also occur within the area mapped as seasonal wetland within the delineated wetland boundary, where they appear to be expanding down the topographic gradient in response to drier soil conditions following groundwater pumping during construction of the City’s Wet Weather Equalization Basin.

During the re-evaluation of the wetland boundaries in April, 2023, the extent and composition of nonnative annual grassland was consistent with the original 2020 delineation.

Disturbed and Ornamental
Disturbed habitat includes land cleared of vegetation or lands that have undergone frequent or extensive alteration to the extent that the site is dominated by non-native plant species. This type of habitat also includes areas subject to periodic vegetation management, such as mowing or brush clearing, which preclude the re-establishment of native vegetation communities. Within the study area, a parking area adjacent to Crespi Drive that is used by beach visitors, and a gravel staging area used during construction of the Wet Weather Equalization Basin are disturbed habitat (Figure 3).

Ornamental vegetation consists of maintained and unmaintained landscaping using native and non-native plants. Within the study area, large Monterey cypress trees are remnants of landscaping associated with the former residence on the Murphy parcel. An additional area of ornamental vegetation located in front of the Community Center is included within the current study area. None of the ornamental vegetation is within the delineated wetland boundary (sample point 3D).

1.b
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 10
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Table 1. Plant Species in Study Area

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INDICATOR STATUS
Agrostis pallens Diego bent grass UPL
Atriplex prostrata fat hen FAC
Avena barbata* slender oats NL
Baccharis pilularis ssp. consanguinea coyote brush NL
Bromus diandrus* ripgut brome NL
Bromus hordeaceus* soft brome FACU
Carduus pycnocephala* Italian thistle NL
Carpobrotus edulis* ice plant NL
Cirsium vulgare* bull thistle FACU
Cortaderia jubata* jubata grass FACU
Geranium dissectum* cutleaf geranium NL
Eucalyptus globulus* Tasmanian blue gum NL
Festuca perennis* Italian ryegrass FAC
Fumaria capreolata* white ramping fumitory NL
Hedera helix* English ivy FACU
Hesperocyparis macrocarpa** Monterey cypress NL
Holcus lanatus* velvet grass FAC
Hordeum murinum ssp. leporinum* hare barley FAC
Lythrum hyssopifolia* hyssop loosestrife OBL
Juncus balticus Baltic rush FACW
Juncus effusus common rush FACW
Malva nicaeensis* bull mallow NL
Medicago polymorpha* bur clover FACU
Melilotus albus* white sweetclover NL
Myoporum laetum* ngaio tree UPL
Persicaria punctata dotted smartweed OBL
Potentilla anserina ssp. pacifica Pacific silverweed OBL Pseudognaphalium luteoalbum* Jersey cudweed FACW
Rubus ursinus California blackberry FACU
Rumex crispus* curly dock FAC
Salix lasiolepis arroyo willow FACW
Solanum douglasii Douglas’ nightshade FAC
Sonchus oleraceus* sow thistle UPL
Symphyotrichum chilense Pacific aster FAC

1.b
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 11
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
SOILS
Soils in the study area are mapped as Urban land or Urban land-Orthents, cut and fill complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes18. While this is an accurate description of the adjacent parcels that already have been developed, a more accurate description of the soil on the undeveloped study area is the Candlestick-Barnabe complex, which is mapped in the comparable undeveloped parcel west of the skate park, and may have been the native soil type prior to widespread development of the Linda Mar neighborhood. The Barnabe soil series describes shallow well-drained soils formed from sandstone and shale19, while the Candlestick soil series is moderately steep, well-drained soils20 (i.e., on the surrounding hillsides). Neither soil series is considered hydric (though this does not preclude hydric soils from forming where these series area mapped).

Soil samples examined to determine the northern wetland boundary were typically sandy to sandy loam, with some clay, to depths of greater than 18 inches. Several samples (1A, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3B, 3C; see wetland delineation data forms in the attachments) exhibited redoximorphic features in the form of concentrations of oxidized iron minerals indicating the soils have been (but are not necessarily currently) subject to saturation by a seasonally high water table. These samples met the “Sandy Redox (S5) hydric soil indicator21.

Soils examined near the southern boundary of the City parcel, as described in detail below, and on the wetland data forms. Sample points SP-1 and SP-2 are representative of past alterations (i.e., filling or grading) that have raised the land surface
and SP-3) are different than in the north, as described below:

Sample Point SP-1 is at the location of the proposed emergency riser within the City’s existing drainage easement, next to the wooden backyard fence and close to an existing underground storm drain that carries stormwater and urban nuisance drainage from residential neighborhoods west toward the Anza Pump Station on Pacifica State Beach). The sample location is in a small depression that will facilitate drainage when water accumulates on the southern part of the City and Murphy parcels. The soil in this location is a clay loam consisting of a dark surface horizon (0-6 inches; 10YR2/1) lacking redoximorphic features. The lower horizon consists of pale yellow coarse gravelly clay (6-18+ inches; 10YR3/4 and

2.5Y3/3), with angular gravel that suggests its origin is either fill or overburden placed when the neighboring yards were extended into the drainage easement. The soil does not exhibit indicators of prolonged inundation or saturation, and is presumed not to be hydric (i.e., not a wetland soil).

To the east of SP-1, a slight rise of 1 to 2 feet separates the proposed riser location from the area where wetland hydrology is apparent as prolonged inundation and soil saturation supporting the willow-dominated portion of the study area. Sample Point SP-2 is located on the slight topographic rise. The ground 18 USDA. 2014. Ibid. (soil report, see Attachment). 19 USDA. 2003. Barnabe Series. Official Soil Series Descriptions and Series Classification. https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/B/BARNABE.html 20 USDA. 2003. Candlestick Series. Official Soil Series Descriptions and Series Classification. https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/C/CANDLESTICK.html 21 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA NRCS). 2010. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0. L.M Vasilas, G.W. Hurt and C.V. Noble, eds. In cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. Available online at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1046970.pdf

1.b
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 12
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
surface is relatively bare, with yard waste debris. Soil at SP-2 is also likely fill material, with a pale yellow gravelly clay surface horizon (0-9 inches; 10YR5/6) with inclusions of darker organic-enriched material (10YR3/2). Below this is a transitional stratum of coarse gravelly clay (9-15 inches; 2.5YR3/2). Below 15 inches, the soil transitions to sandy clay, possibly the cut and fill orthents that are mapped in the Soil Survey report. The color is pale yellow (2.5Y3/2) with up to 2% redox concentrations (7.5YR5/8) indicating periodic endosaturation from seasonal high groundwater. Although the deeper horizon indicates influence from nearby areas of prolonged saturation, the overall profile at this sample point does not conform to the hydric soil criteria.

The topography at Sample Point SP-2, adjacent to the wooden backyard fence line, is slightly higher in elevation than the area of prolonged inundation and soil saturation supporting the willow-dominated portion of the study area to the north. The sample point likely experiences periods of inundation or saturation following significant storm events, but it is not a persistent condition.

None of the three criteria (vegetation, soil or hydrology) are met, therefore, Sample Point SP-2 is not a wetland.

Sample Point SP-3 is located in the middle of the arroyo willow thicket, approximately 20 feet north of the wood fence. Vegetation, soil and hydrology conditions differ markedly from SP-1 and SP-2. Willow trees and shrubs at this location support a dense canopy, and meet the hydrophytic vegetation criterion.

California blackberry also is present, but no other plants species are in the understory; the ground covered with accumulated branches and decomposing plant debris.

The soil is native (not fill), and exhibits hydric characteristics: from 0-6 inches, it is black organic enriched silty clay (10YR2/1); from 6-15+ inches, it is saturated gravelly clay (2.5Y3/2 and 2.5Y4/2), with 5% dark inclusions (10YR/2/1) of illuviated clay and/organic matter, and distinct redox concentrations of 2.5Y3/6.

This soil meets the hydric soil definition of “Redox Dark Surface”22 at sample point SP-3.

All three wetland criteria are met at SP-3, therefore SP-3 is a wetland.

HYDROLOGY
The study area is not located on a stream or near other surface waters. No wetlands or other surface waters are shown in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) as occurring on the City or Murphy parcels.

The California Aquatic Resource Inventory (CARI) shows a stream channel crossing the parcel, classified as “Fluvial Unnatural”. While no such channel is located on the parcel, the mapped feature does correspond to an existing drainage easement at the southwestern border of the parcel, which could carry overflow from the City and Murphy parcels toward the west-northwest to a buried drainage culvert with drain inlets, and ultimately pumped to the Pacific Ocean at the Anza Pump Station. However, there is no evidence that water from the project parcels moves via this hypothetical drainage pathway. These maps are often imprecise due to the mapping scale and scope, which may be an indication of changes in land use and drainage, and stormwater management. The two parcels are nearly enclosed by surrounding development, from which it has received stormwater runoff (i.e., from the roof of the Crespi Center to the east (580 Crespi Drive), and possibly from the Community Center and parking lot to the west. 22 U.S. Department of Agric., Nat. Res. Consv. Serv. 2010. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils.in the United States. Version 7.0. L.M. Vasilas, G.W. Hurt, and C.V. Noble (eds). USDA, NRCS, in cooperation with the National technical Committee for Hydric Soils.

1.b
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 13
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Historic aerial photographs from as early as 1946 (predating development of the Pedro Valley and Linda Mar, show that the parcels are not in the path of drainage from either the Linda Mar neighborhood in general, or the remnant stream segments that are located in the hills to the north east, across Crespi Drive. Similar hydrological conditions appear in 1956 (see Figure 4); although residential development was well underway, parcels adjacent to and near the study area are still relatively vacant, and the study area itself is occupied by one or more residences and outbuildings. By 1980, however, following construction of the original parking lot where the City’s Wet Weather Equalization Basin and skate park are now located, there is some evidence of willows or other wetland vegetation beginning to develop at the lowest part of the southwestern end of the parcels (the southwestern end), possibly in response to restriction of runoff imposed by the parking lot (Figure 5).

During 2017 and 2018, construction of the City’s Wet Weather Equalization Basin required groundwater pumping. It is likely that the local water table, including the adjacent City and Murphy parcels, was drawn down to some degree. Soils in the region have a high proportion of sand, which is not effective at retaining water when groundwater is being removed nearby.

Although groundwater extraction is not ongoing as part of operation of the basin, there is a drainage system that removes surface runoff and, presumably, shallow groundwater. This system could continue to remove shallow groundwater from the upper soil horizon within the study area. Observers have remarked that the shallow pond in the study area did not retain water during the winter of 2019-2020, preceding the 2020 delineation field work. At that time, no sample point locations exhibited surface or shallow groundwater, although there was evidence in several samples (redoximorphic features in the form of iron mineral concentrations and reduced matrices) that the soils had developed under conditions that likely included seasonally high groundwater to within 12 inches of the soil surface. However, other evidence (lack of observed water table, abundance of worm burrows, and elevation above the presumed high water line of the former pond), suggest that the redoximorphic evidence is relictual, i.e., indicative of past hydrologic conditions, not current conditions. The seasonal wetland zone that is transitional between the wetter emergent marsh and arroyo willow vegetation (Figure 2) may also be an expression of changes in shallow groundwater since the construction of the Equalization Basin. Two delineation sample points (1A and 3B; see Figure 3) lack indicators of wetland hydrology, but retain hydrophytic vegetation and soil indicators (i.e. redoximorphic features) that were considered the strongest wetland indicators in the 2014 delineation.

Compared to the 2014 delineated wetland boundary, the northern wetland boundary has shifted slightly toward the southwest, following the topographic contour. Following the exceptionally wet winter of 2022- 2023, ponding on the project parcels was temporarily more extensive and longer in duration than in previous years, requiring pumping from neighboring properties. In April 2023, the wetland sample points bracketing the northern wetland boundary were re-examined in the field but did not indicate any difference from the 2020 delineation.

In the southwestern part of the City parcel, closer examination of the wetland boundary in March and April, 2022, indicated wetland hydrology corresponding with arroyo willows and subtle topographic contours. Groundwater was observed at a depth of 15 inches. The ground slopes slightly to the north, where standing water was accumulated at the surface, providing a clear indication of the seasonally high water table that supports the willow-dominated wetland in the majority of the southern part of the study area.

The hydrology criterion was met at sample point SP-3. Near sample point SP-1, slight rise of 1 to 2 feet separates the proposed riser location from the area where wetland hydrology is evident as prolonged inundation and soil saturation supporting the willow-dominated portion of the study area. Sample points

1.b
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 14
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
SP-1 and SP-2, located on the higher ground, likely experience periods of inundation or saturation following significant storm events, but not as a persistent condition that meets the hydrology criterion.

WETLANDS
Table 2 summarizes the areas of wetlands and non-wetland (uplands) in the study area. All aquatic resources in the study area are wetlands; there are no open waters (i.e., other waters of the U.S.). All areas are preliminary and subject to verification by the USACE if proposed project activities would result in discharge of fill into aquatic resources determined to be jurisdictional. Areas of waters of the state within the study area are assumed to be equal to waters of the U.S.

The northern wetland boundary is inferred from the location of one sample point where all three wetland criteria were met (sample point 2A) and two sample points where direct evidence of wetland hydrology is lacking but could be inferred from soil indicators (1A and 3B; see Figure 3). The latter two points are considered to be non-wetland, but on the boundary. All three points are located at or below the 10-foot contour, as shown on a topographic survey of the Murphy parcel23. The willow vegetation type is bisected by the wetland boundary, resulting in a portion of arroyo willow scrub that meets the wetland criteria and a portion that does not. Seasonal wetland is mapped in the transitional zone. This is consistent with the interpretation that site hydrology has changed toward drier conditions since groundwater pumping during construction of the City’s Wet Weather Equalization Basin.

The southern wetland boundary was established between the one sample point where all three wetland criteria were met (SP-3) and two sample points where the criteria were not met (SP-1 and SP-2). Sample point SP-3 is located in the interior of the arroyo willow thicket and in the topographic depression where soils are inundated or saturated for a significant part of the growing season.

UPLANDS
Upland areas that do not meet the wetland criteria were confirmed by six sample points near the northern wetland boundary (1B, 1C, 2B, 2C, 3C and 3D) and at two points near the southern wetland boundary (SP-1 and SP-2). A combination of vegetation, soils or hydrology failed to meet the wetland criteria at these locations. Additionally, these points are located higher on the topographic gradient.

Table 2. Wetlands and Uplands in the Study Area
FEATURE TYPE (SAMPLE PT.) WETLAND UPLAND TOTAL
Arroyo willow scrub 0.460 ac (20,037 sf) 0.090 ac (3,920 sf) 0.550 ac (23,958 sf) Emergent marsh 0.240 ac (10,454 sf) 0.000 ac (0.0 sf) 0.240 ac (10,454 sf) Seasonal wetland 0.060 ac (2,614 sf) 0.000 ac (0.0 sf) 0.060 ac (2,614 sf) Non-native annual grassland 0.000 ac (0.0 sf) 0.400 ac (17,424 sf) 0.400 ac (17,424 sf) Disturbed and ornamental 0.000 ac (0.0 sf) 0.980 (42,689 sf) 0.980 (42,689 sf) Total 0.760 ac (33,105 sf) 1.470 ac (64,033 sf) 2.230 ac (97,138 sf) 23 B & H Surveying, Inc. 2014. Boundary and Topographic Survey, Lands of Murphy. APN 022-162-310.

1.b
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 15
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA

JURISDICTIONAL ANALYSIS
Recent changes to the definition of waters of the U.S. have resulted in changes in the interpretation of the federal jurisdictional status of the wetland on the City and Murphy parcels. In 2020, at the time of the first wetland delineation update, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Army’s (USACE) Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR) was in effect. The NWPR included adjacent wetlands, which could be separated from waters of the U.S. by an artificial structure so long as that structure allows for a direct hydrologic connection between the adjacent wetlands and waters of the U.S. The 2020 wetland delineation acknowledged that the wetland on the project parcels could be considered jurisdictional by virtue of its potential connection to the ocean by way of the drainage easement, stormwater sewer, and Anza Pump Station.

In January, 2023, the Navigable Waters Protection Rule was repealed and replaced with a new revised rule. In August, 2023, and as a result of the Supreme Court of the United States decision on Sackett v.

EPA24, the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced a final rule revising the definition of “waters of the United States” (see Regulatory Definitions, above), which went into effect on September 8, 2023. According to this rule, adjacent wetlands must be contiguous with navigable waters, i.e., with a continuous25 surface water connection. The wetland on the City and Murphy properties does not exhibit a continuous surface water connection to navigable waters (the Pacific Ocean, in this case), because it is interrupted by (a) drainage swale that exhibited no flow during the wet winter of 2022-2023; (b) a subsurface storm drain system that would capture any flow, should it occur; and (c) a system of flood control pumps that would be required to discharge flow to the ocean.

In the southwestern corner of the study area, surface water (i.e., in excess of what percolates on site or is pumped from neighboring properties) could enter the shallow drainage swale that flows west-northwest toward Highway 1, parallel with the backyard fences of houses on Anza Drive. This swale follows the route of a buried 24-inch storm drain culvert. At least two drain inlets to the culvert are located at ground surface level within the undeveloped parcel between the skate park and Highway 1. The culvert crosses Highway 1 under the north entrance to the parking lot for Pacifica State Beach, where it connects to the Anza Pump Station, which discharges directly to the Pacific Ocean. However, following the exceptionally wet winter of 2022-2023, there was no evidence of surface water flow exiting the City and Murphy parcels by way of the drainage easement except by way of the underground storm sewer. Although higher water levels did occur following the large rain events, necessitating pumping from neighboring properties, it does not appear that the water level overtopped the low berm in the southwest corner of the City parcel.

The wetland on the City and Murphy parcels is never inundated by water from the Pacific Ocean by way of the culvert and swale, nor from any tributary that enters the site (there are none). Therefore, the wetlands in the study area, although they exhibit field indicators consistent with jurisdictional wetlands, do not appear to meet the current regulatory definition of federal jurisdictional waters of the U.S. under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Because the proposed project does not propose any actions resulting in a discharge of fill into the wetlands, development of the proposed project does not require a Section 404 permit under the USACE regulatory program.

Most of the wetland (excluding a portion of the arroyo willow scrub that failed to meet all three wetland criteria) would still be considered waters of the state subject to regulatory review by the San Francisco 24 8 F.4th 1075 (9th Cir. 2021), cert. granted Jan. 24. 2022. 25 As used here, “continuous” means spatially connected or physically uninterrupted, not continuously inundated or flowing.

1.b
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 16
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board but only if actions were proposed that resulted in wetland fill or degradation of water quality. Waters of the state are more broadly defined according to recently published guidance26.

EFFECTS ANALYSIS
Waters of the U.S.

Because of the absence of a continuous surface hydrological connection to navigable waters, the wetlands in the study area do not appear to meet the current regulatory definition of federal jurisdictional waters of the U.S. under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Additionally, because the proposed project does not propose any actions resulting in a discharge of fill into jurisdictional wetlands or other waters, development of the proposed project does not require a Section 404 permit under the USACE regulatory program.

Waters of the State
Waters of the State include waters of the U.S., but may also include areas that do not meet the criteria for federal jurisdictional status. The State wetland definition is:
“An area is wetland if, under normal circumstances, (1) the area has continuous or recurrent saturation of the upper substrate caused by groundwater, or shallow surface water, or both; (2) the duration of such saturation is sufficient to cause anaerobic conditions in the upper substrate; and (3) the area’s vegetation is dominated by hydrophytes or the area lacks vegetation.” The State wetland definition relies on the federal delineation method to identify state wetlands. On the City and Murphy parcels, the central area of arroyo willow scrub, freshwater emergent marsh and transitional seasonal wetland have been shown to meet this definition (see cross-hatched portions of Figure 3), while the areas mapped as arroyo willow scrub (non-JD) do not satisfy criteria (1) or (2).

The proposed project would remove or prune an estimated 784 sf of arroyo willow scrub to meet parking and walkway requirements at the southern edge of Building B. This portion of arroyo willow scrub does not meet all three wetland criteria (i.e., soil and hydrology indicators are lacking), therefore is not included in the wetland total. The proposed project also would result in planting of 1,170 sf of willow scrub (see Sheet A1.13 of design submittal). This project element would avoid fill discharge into waters of the state and would not result in substantial impacts to beneficial uses as defined in the Basin Plan27. However, if required, the project would comply with applicable water quality regulations, such as acquiring Waste Discharge Requirements through the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Board.

Riparian Habitat
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife regulates alteration of streams and lakes beds through its Stream and Lakebed Alteration authorization program (California Fish and Game Code Section 1600 etseq.). Although the small area of area of arroyo willow scrub that would be removed is not associated with a stream or lakebed setting, the CDFW may consider that this area meets its interpretation of riparian vegetation, and require notification, review, and authorization under SAA. If so required, the project 26 California Water Boards. 2021. Ibid.
27 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB). 2011. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan). San Francisco Bay Region. Available online at https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/basin_planning.html

1.b
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 17
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
would obtain and comply with Stream and Lakebed Alteration Agreement conditions. As described above the proposed project includes replacement of the willows that would be removed.

1.b
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 18
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA

ATTACHMENTS
Figure 1 – Study Area Location
Figure 2 – Study Area
Figure 3 – Jurisdictional Map
Figure 4 – Topographic Survey
Figure 5 – Aerial photograph, 1956
Figure 6 – Aerial photograph, 1980
Wetland Delineation Data Forms
Representative Photographs
Soils Report
WETS Tables
National Wetland Inventory Map
California Aquatic Resource Inventory Map

1.b
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 19
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 1. Study Area Location
Study Areal Location
Point S•n P•dro
Dt111lls Slidt1
© 202CJ Goc,glo
:t~ C.~IJMfJ :JHAL, Cf\ C;FC
~r:ags © 2.020 T0rraM~;trJcg
T3 S

1.b
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 20
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 2. Study Area

1.b
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 21
Figure 3. Wetland Map

.

J,
\
\
----\
_} I •-•
-u--..
..... - - ~-'--.. 1=
~-..,-5c,.., - --J ;:

SP-s..i,i.Pk,,_, .,,...._~-p.J -•
"<.-';
r~":"'"' -- :~r..ut,IWl'.HGl..:t t6581f
~ - ~~------------:'.-
(,
/'-'lltl:l'-""'0DIUN:AlK7'1
LU. (JIJ!hSO, Wl;n,u,QJ
------ .l()._SP-3
AWS-2
...---
\ \
Q![
, .. ,,,,,.
= ====,
\ l WflV.~
SW-1 I ~~-
n1/ A 18 /' 0 1C
.----1--~- 0
028 0 2C
540 & 570 CRESPI DRIVE
PAC:KI,, CA ll;O RHIA 94QU.
= =
-;::.
~1!)
.,,,.. ..
0 stref'LAH
SHn nnE
FIGUREJa

WETLAN D MA P
' I I I
~00-l'
I
·1 ~
=·
','\ ',1
;,\ ,\
'\' I ' '
I II
Ii I
', '1,1,1'~ -
lj 11
'\ !
'1 ' I
,,
'1\ I
11\ I I I
',1 I
1,11 I
111,\ 1 1[ 1 '/,\ 1\ :

I
,, ,,
'\ I 1, '1 ,,
•l l 11 l
\I r ,\:,
1, 1,
1\ '
11 11
'\ I I :·
lq 111
'\ :1
: 11,
< ./ 11 ', '
,,. ,; ti
11 i
w
ED
ARCHllfCIS

1.b
Packet Pg. 801
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 22
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 4. Topographic Map
\
'
/ ------....... ____ ______ _
( F \ ·,
.. \ \ '
', \
\ '
', \\ \ h ' \ \'\
' ' \ \
\ \ \ ' ' I ' \
\ \
' ' ' '
\ \111:
:~ ,::: l
ii'
·-._._ l '-_--. - 0 :I 111- - - ~~ - c "- .., I
• -- ~-7 I (. 1r > d O '
,, • • ___; I i.
:_--- ;- t
: .: , 'I i o I ii - ---=:7 i [ • • I
O O ~ I I
L: - ~- ,I :1 ..... _ - - _, H
.. ! -.--._ __ I : I
~--- -7 i /-
' ' ! f----- -7 I i
: : i1, ! L ___ __ I i' i
i-~--7 i i
! ___ ( , ~~ ~:

1.b
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 23
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 5. Aerial photograph (1956)
No evidence of wetland vegetation within the study area, most of which is in active use. No surrounding development has occurred yet.

City and Murphy parcels
Linda Mar

1.b
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis 24
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Figure 6. Aerial photograph (1980) Drive
Dark vegetation within the study area suggests wetlands forming following construction of parking lot, which may have limited lateral movement of shallow groundwater.

Study Area
Parking lot
Community Center
Linda Mar
City and Murphy parcels Highway 1
Crespi Drive

1.b
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Wetland Delineation Data Forms

1.b
Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ProjecVSite: 5?t() C\..flS/1; Dr City/County: flu, 1. co... l':;8- 11 /1.t,kt, Sampling Date: -:f /19 /zo ApplicanVOwner: (30.., l J,i, f.. 5 rn,,.,(tr lnr, State: CA Sampling Point: 1-A lnvestigator(s): ( /2e>q~ r J / vs/a O d &; (',. Section, Township, Range: _ ___ __________ __ _ /
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): I\ )ON ·Slope(%): ___t!l__ Subregion (LRR): _ _.L._L_ _ ____ _____ Lat: ~t O '.> S' 1 C: Z.. 7$11 Long':_" (1.:z... c, 2 ~ 1 St, 3/ 1
' Datum: _ __ _
Soil Map Unit Name: Co.hl((QsAck- &;,,,-,,.. 6-e NWI classification: ......:.Ab..= 1 :.if\O.».<<'--- ---
Are climatic/ hydrologic cond,s on the site typical for this time of year? Yes .2S,__ No _ _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _f/_, Soil __ , or Hydrology 1-_ significantly disturbed? Are •Normal Circumstances• present? Yes __ No ~ Are Vegetation _/JJ__, Soil __t!__, or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No
No
No )(
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
/tty /NI 0/1 ou., a /
Yes ___ No .½_
Remarks: 1/1/ cr/'/-cr1°'- /b.Lfkt.T. So..""'[w loCc,..kd r-oo.... /OC/V4!'Sf 5atJ..<JOr-a../ or<:!--~ t<J<tl ~ c-cc"r- "/cl' -lo r:;..(11) VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.

Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:

Tree Stratum (Plot size: \ % Cover SQecies? Status Number of Dominant Species

1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)

2. Total Number of Dominant

3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (8)

4. = Total Cover
Percent of Dominant Species
-=,,c;- Zf'vl_e' ) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/8)
SaQling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:

1. 5al ,y.. /o..5 io lep1".s 20 y EIKW Prevalence Index worksheet:

Total% Cover of: MultiQI~ b~:

2. OBL species 13 x 1 = 1,3. 3. FACW species 15 x2= <b

4. FAC species 25 x3= 9-S

5. /0 -10 20 FACU species x4=
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2-M ,.ef )
= Total Cover
UPL species I x5= 5"

1., r ,,:1,,.r'>Cl/4C. l::a.1-h' cus. 2,;- 'I fi1()1-I Column Totals: li~ (A) 223 (8)

2. "7o!enhit~ Cl.VI raLi"o...,.., LO Iv Q/!,L- Prevalence Index = 8/A = -z.~r

3. Hole.us. /0.,-10-.fu..5 'L'S y. Pit',, Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

4. (')f'~S.iu.M 1LuJaa.r~ {s' 1'f Ed.CU _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

5. Ri-rsico.t',()... n~,,,c-ki-./o- ~ /V a6L. X. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% ,n I , . _.L_ ·- .. ,, A'! ,,., JAi ,_ __ ,i ,6._ 3 - Prevalence Index is S3.01 0 . '~ '..,; .,..,. - , . I~..,,, -

7. G-e.ro,,, r'u. ,,.,,, d isse.c+v.. 1\.11 l Al NL.. _ 4. Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting

8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)

9. - 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants'

10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)

11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 7l. = Total Cover
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ZfVl{Jf. l
:.:: 1. t.2Y..h.ruJ. r.t:r<;.inuS g_ y £ACU Hydrophytic

2. ·Vegetation )< 2. Present? Yes No
Ct, = Total Cover --
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
Remarks:.54,"1,ffW f o,'".,.. lo co..-k c( /l.Jl/),r e.dJ e of 1j, c.,uz a 5 ,.~ j N.fl"S-e, l-v..(Lf'/o,,,, d w. ~e fo..~ ..

US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) SOIL Sampling Point'
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) _?{g__ Color (moist) _?{g__ ~ Loc2 Texture Remarks o-z....
z, /I ,-.t/ft -- NIA --------- ~D~ma. ~~nl~c'----'--'" lc~t/4~~~r __ z.SY 3/3 7S _ ___ ______ .,<;cu,dCI _ -:r- _-_____ _ fo 'I ~ 3/z_ Z ~ r,of red~ Cl~CJC>J'v1-'---------
//-1 ~-+- z,514/ -4 ID_ ZS{ 1/1 l?Y 'RM _M_ .5(J,. o/ c \..!CC /OA.t =r------- ------__ /o'Lf.. S/8 ±:.._ _Q__ _f!1_ __ _ o _____ _
---- ---------- - --------------- ---- -------------
--------- ------- --- ------ ----- -------------
------- -- -------------- -- ----- -------------
'Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Deoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Linino, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all Lf.,Rs, unless otherwise noted.) _ Histosol (A1) & Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8)
Restrictive Layer (if present):

Type: ______ ______ _
Depth (inches): ______ _ _ _ _
Remarks: /2.J. d 0c fr,

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (89) (except _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48)
__ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B1 1)
_ Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ 2 cm Muck (A10)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.

Hydric Soil Present? Yes )(_ No __
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2,
4A, and 4B)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (02) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR·A)
l{, Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A)
_ Frost-Heave Hummocks (07)
Field Observations:

Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
includes ca illar frin e
Yes __ No _L Depth (inches): ____ _
Yes __ No _A_ Depth (inches): ____ _
Yes __ No .L Depth (inches): _ ___ _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
~
Remarks:...e.,c.,-lOleM ce of .$.0.0.AO;l\()I.,_( /1...jt.... (/.)0..)JYt f~{p./ /;;..;' r~d 1:...t_( 0c~d/ud g:,r"I. s(/VJ~cr +t.1.J o...u? a- , s
fA....t lo (A) C<1~ j f, . "'~ €&1
J) 0\..,4-) ("\. -
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: n o I ; r. City/County: fbL, I Y.,c(),. &n f}1 tl/e () Sampling Date: ? It r I '2tJ I .,., A ' I
Applicant/Owner: C, State: - vt1 ~~- Sampling Point: J B,, lnvestigator(s): IQ (CQta;,../ Section, Township, Range: ________________ _ Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ___________ Local relief (concave, convex, none): /\)ol".L Slope{%):~ Subregion (LRR): A Lat: n ° 35, SZ, <f 1 '• Long: - , z.z. 0 (., 9 , 5'1-, O<J I/ Datum:---- Soil Map Unit Name: CA-w::l{e..,<;-4ck..-&r~~ llOk t'l'I $0,Js) NWI classification: ~AA~~AIL~~---- Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes __c;,_ No __ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ___N_. Soil --1!1__, or Hydrology~ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances· present? Yes _ _ No ~ Are Vegetation .!::!._, Soil _!::I.._, or Hydrology.!'::!..__ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ ;(_ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No z<' Is the Sampled Area
--- __L Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No.E:__ within a Wetland? Yes No --- --- Remarks:/1,//&u; ho-~ ~ /\ C,v..Q./1~ I' A.J2fC#l EG. et>:, , n • ..5,0;1,t(,_ L.-- /cu,,,, (/4. ~I"' c»- "" I a,/ .9\., £/'t:;t~ .. 1.. (a /q.AJ 9 _ ..

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ____ _
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status

1. ----------------------------

2. --------------------- -----

3. ----------------- ---------
4, --------------------------
___ = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ____ _

1. --------------------------

2. --------------------------

3. --------------------------

4. - -------------------------

5. --------------------------
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2 ~ CJ'

1. £.12.sf-r.,.,c o... ~i:S

2. /b./R,11h/6. o..11 s:1 !'in~

3. ' Tl)-
___ = Total Cover
,(_I NL -

6. - ---------------- ---------

7. --------------------- -----

8. --------------------------

9. ------------------ --------
10 _________________ - -----------

11. -------------------~- -------- 14
W99,f1Y Vine Stratum (Plot size: ?, M (/J)

1.~bCA,/) y rs ,'r.tt~ ~L _ __ y_ FACU
= Total Cover

2. ------- ----------- ~- --------
_ ._! __ = Total Cover
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum SS
Dominance Test worksheet:

Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: I
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: z..

Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: S-0
Prevalence Index worksheet:

Total% Cover of: MultiQIY by:

OBL species ~ X 1 = 8
FACW species 0 x2 = 0
FAC species 3S- x3= ,osFACU species I x4 = 1
UPL species I x5= '0
Column Totals: ,15" (A) /22
Prevalence Index = B/A = ,z ,~,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%

6. 3 - Prevalence Index is ~3.01
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
(B)
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5 -Wetland Non-Vascular Plants'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' {Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes -6,__ No __
Remarks: /\/0//1 _ o/ 0 ,11,/ i" 0<. ~ T
(#e. fj-e r Co ,,,o', h'o,0
o..c O I lo.. t-:"'""
fut rl l'C pl,<-, .µ ) ;0c e- < . /' e ,i,,. 11 a II f of' pre. vi eiv 0 # ,co r (_ (/W p\,,( v.-t/ f j c( UA / I\P, C 0,0 ~Ir . 0 f' Go. .,s ,'-. I' . !JJJ q -w .-f, et elf, ,v 111~.j1 r.

US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) SOIL Sampling Point: _ (_.B __ _
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) ___%___ Color (moist) ___%___ ~ Loe' Texture Remarks 0 -'l.... /J//t _ _ N/A __ __ _ _ ___ tA"f}l'/c, !,4e r z- ? IOY R.. 2/1 90 _:_ ______ ..5°A4<.. d =Q.«,c..:;,:...-.......: /o~o.. c..:...."4.t _,_ 1 _ ___ _
/0'/A., '3/3 _jQ__ 11of red of. ..so, r8t• ;ficlv~len.; 9- af+ 2._s, -11 -z- ~ :r-,s1 s;la s- c M .~ CV> ro.N ,,,., 7 ~ Rv.k r-M 5 -------------- --
------- ---- --- --
------- ---------
------- --------- 1
Type: C=Concentration, D=Deoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore lininn, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) _ Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Black Histic (A3) _ loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3} _ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8)
Restrictive Layer (if present):

Type: _ ___________ _
Depth (inches): ______ _ __ _
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 1ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.

Hydric Soil Present? Yes ___ No _J{_
Remarks: j&dc,,< ,'QO d..JJlt{>-Cor- S6j or F=!-, /<..o.,l,'c.r o.f' 170...s- G-w,· (O.,,.,;vL/' hort''C,..o/1 d r,e.l' ~ kLor..1..) w/0-l>e,,.r1o/. Jl.~-!-lt.&,\.lorl\A s, {$0 s~o/lo,..,f .$:>--,-/--c-.-..~Ct:A ,:,,._f bf f(,.._ I &Lt ll/4oS f-,

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Prima[Y Indicators (minimum of one reguired; check all that aQQllt'.} Seconda!Y Indicators 12 or more reguired} _ Surface Water (A 1} _ Water-Stained Leaves (89) (except _ Water-Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (811) _ Drainage Patterns (810) _ Water Marks (81) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9} _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (02) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (03) _ Iron Deposits (85) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAG-Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks (07) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:

Surface Water Present? Yes __ No -15_ Depth (inches):

Water Table Present? Yes __ No ;( Depth (inches):

Saturation Present? Yes _ _ No X Depth (inches): Wet No ~ land Hydrology Present? Yes --- (includes capillary frincie) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks: /ow-e I' -/ojJCJ ~,1&( I I\ Cu. a.,; / "J "'J 6<-Pt~~ o:z.o t I '"J -(av.Jcv'd /i Jd r rrt;; , c V't_J,.

US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) lnvestigator(s): (! Section, Township, Range:

Landform (hillslope, terrade, etc.): ____________ Local rel ief {concave, convex, none): .I\/~ Slope(%): --Z- A " le:--? . ,c:-t:;;>"' - " 0,r-/ Qt, Subregion (LRR): --=---'----- ~~~-~-- Lat: -:1,":/- JS :::; '-' ' v Q Long : / 2,2 2... I ,llq , ' Datum: ___ _ Soil Map Unit Name: Cb-Ile/ lesh'ck- (Jo.,b.e,{ss& f}QK ;/) sa,'ts) NWI classification /\/oA9- Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes L_ No _.:: (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _E_, Soil _li__, or Hydrology M_ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances· present? Yes _ _ No __ Are Vegetation _N_, Soil~. or Hydrology ~ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes .15___ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.

Tree Stratum (Plot size: _____ _,
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status

1. ---------------------------

2. --------------------- ------

3. ------------------ ---- -----

4. --------------------- ------
___ = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ____ __,

1. --- --------------- ---------

2. ------------------ ---------

3. ------------------- --------

4. ---------------------- -----

5. ------- --------------------
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2,. M {:i! \

1. µb/CIA..() /QJIA'tt,AJ

2. l~.ea+u i.s:
___ = Total Cover
.3C2
{0

4. ---------- ------ -----------
5, ------------ - ------ ----- ---

6. -------- -------- --- - - - -----

7. - - ---------------------- ---

8. ------------ - ------ - - --- ---

9. --------- ------------ - - - ---

10. ---------------------- --------
11 . ___________ _______ -------- ----
40 = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ZM

1. /?o6cu u f'S,r,u_s s- ___.__ _:,4cu

2. ------------------- -------- .s: = Total Cover
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum ,5S
Remarks: (VOA _ fu;dric )
US Army Corps of Engineers
Dominance Test worksheet:

Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2.

Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3
That
Percent
Are
o
OBL
f Dom
, F
in
ACW
ant Species
, or FAC: &r
Prevalence Index worksheet:

Total % Cover of: Multir;!II' bl':

OBL species 0 X 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x2= 0
FAC species -10 x3= /2,Q
FACU species _') x4 = zo
UPL species 0 x5 = 0
Column Totals: 15 (A) l~O
Prevalence Index = BIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
;J._ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is :S:3.01
(A)
(8)
(A/8)
(8)
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5 - Welland Non-Vascular Plants'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No £
Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) SOIL Sampling Point: IC,
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth
(inches)
0-t_
2-~
(p-!Z
Matrix Redox Features
---------- ------
------------- --- ---- -------------
---------------- ---- ------------- 1
T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) _ Histosol (A 1) :/:.. Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A1 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8)
Restrictive Layer (if present):

Type: ____________ _
Depth (inches): _________ _
Remarks: C. K° A" ,'/,1 r,:s l"(M /IM fIndicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3 :
_ 2 cm Muck (A10)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.

Hydric Soil Present? Yes _K__ No
C/a few 1-,'c i. • &r 1~6',
OvJ Oc.Ptll.1- tA•'ldcvct(cy:,eo/ /Ot..,,..J
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Primari Indicators (minimum of one reguired; check all that a1:11:1lil Secondari Indicators (2 or more reguiredl _ Surface Water (A 1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 4A, and 48) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust{B 11) _ Drainage Patterns (810) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Ory-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (02) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (03) _ Iron Deposits (85) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAG-Neutral Test (05) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks (07) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Field Observations:

Surface Water Present? Yes __ No _x_ Depth (inches):

Water Table Present? Yes _ _ No .2S__ Depth (inches):

Saturation Present? Yes __ No L Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -- No _x__ (includes capillary fringe l
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks: /l}o lrd,'c. o,,./-or .$
us Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ProjecVSite: .£10 ~/ lJf'II.X City/County:/jc/ h C() / So..11 Mc:t"~o Sampling Date: 9-/ r'J,/etJ ApplicanVOwner: &,,, fA}c;;-(c_,5 OA,/)J.{'. !,,c, State: ~ Sampling Point: z A lnvestigator(s): C. i2ryf , 5 / tdootl ~io- Section, Township, Range:----------------- Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc./ & '> IA Local relief (concave, convex, none): c-c-1 CO..v-"- Slope (%}:~ Subregion(LRR): A Lat: !rl- 0l> 'f: ' 5t,91" Long: ( ZZ.0 2 9" 5'8'.!w" Datum: _ __ _ Soil Map Unit Name CfJ4'd (o fhcJ:_ - &rflO , e NWI classification: Afev,..JL_ Are climatic I hydr#ic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _}s,__ No __ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil ~ . or Hydrology 1_ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes __ No _L,,_ Are Vegetation N , Soil /V. or Hydrology ~ naturally problematic? {If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _,L No ---
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ___t__ No Is the Sampled Area --- Yes.,( __ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _K_ No within a Wetland? No --- --- Remarks: Lo~ r ttM--f(4ff- /' ".\._ ,.,-1 e', I "'j>el.,.,/ -11~h ~ k c( re-, /~o. clvJJ Jo re Ulv1 f- 6-w Pu tv1Dt'f\a '-" r Eo 80.,.,, YL . I .., VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
, J J
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ' % Cover SQecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 2.. 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

2. Total Number of Dominant

3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (8}

4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover {g(p That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: {A/B) SaQling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ' Prevalence Index worksheet:

1. Total% Cover of: MultiQI~ b~: 2. OBL species ~-s- X 1 = 5)

3. FACW species lo x2 = z.o

4. FAC species I x3 = 3

5. FACU / ') Ct,0 species x4=
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2.M (if' )
= Total Cover
UPL species 0 x5= 0

1. Pa-4> 11 f, 'f {Ov a 11'51' r l l. o___.. .L:fn y Ol>L Column Totals: BL (A) L3.f5 (B)

2. '7,~ /Eh' ~or!<>--
',~ ~1/ ~ Prevalence Index - BIA - (, 1-

3. ~ rr-:/l= 5 ~ 1-hc u ~ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

4. t / ~~hs ~7~ -!r_ f'AcV _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

5. PAC ¼_ 2 • Dominance Test is >50% ,V\/\0.X /" )., ,;Jc,...5

6. lS._ 3 . Prevalence Index is :.3.01

7. _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting

8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
9 - 5 . Wetland Non-Vascular Plants'

10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)

11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 8( = Total Cover
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Wood~ Vine Stratum (Plot size: )

1. Hydrophytic

2. Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
(9 = Total Cover - -
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
Remarks: v~ / ri /CICAU-1 f -H-.o... f (...A..A-V d fa fo" d a. lV-0... I ' ~ cfrs--fh1r f- + ('Y\tNI r/ Q_J (211/l Sfrjl...1 t; fty4-r e /Y.'(A •cf.

US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Note: observations of standing water greater than 14 days duration in 2022 and 2023.

SOIL Sampling Point: z..AProfile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches} Color /moist\ ~ Color {moist} _____%__ ~ Loc2 Texture 0 -18- z,SY 1/t ~ ? 'fy(lS/a 2- ~ _M__ Sal'd1.--=-- C'....:...: / ~=4+----- Remarks
- --- --------- ------ - - --------
---- ------ - -- -------- --------
---- --------- ------- --------- -----
------------- ---------- ------
- - ----------- -------- - - ------ -----
---- ---------- ----------------
---- ---------- ---------- ---- --
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Deoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Linina, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) _ Histosol (A1) X.. Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Ft) (except MLRA 1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loaf!ly Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8)
Restrictive Layer (if present):

Type: ____________ _
Depth (inches): _________ _
Remarks:

I~

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Primary Indicators {minimum of one required: check all that apply) _ Surface Water (At) _ Water-Stained Leaves (89) (except _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (811)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.

Hydric Soil Present? Yes £ No __
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2,
4A, and 4B)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Water Marks (81) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ct) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Ji._ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
.X Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A)
_ Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7)
Field Observations:

Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
includes ca illa frin e
Yes __ No L Depth (inches): ____ _
Yes __ No .A_ Depth (inches): ____ _
Yes __ No _l_ Depth (inches): ____ _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _K__ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) -
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: S JO WJUP ; !Jr City/County /6,Ct h'c0,.ffe11. /lh./€0 Sampling Date: 9-(19 f 2e, Applicant/Owner: fn-1 !.dor t ,; (1,.-\. ~-1-J I vie, I State: CA Sampling Point: 2.. /3 lnvestigator(s): C, /4J1qr/ , r / {,,Jona' l?r,c • Section, Township, Range: _______________ ....- Landform (hillslope, terrace, : tc.): ____ _______ Local relief (concave, convex, none): N() ;,..L Slope(%): I"(.

Subregion (LRR): ,4 Lat: s:/ "''3,) 1 S7-. (,, 2 ,, Long: r;:_z_o 2_ CJ , TT, 1 0 " Datum: ___ _ Soil Map Unit Name: &tX/ U1 , f,HcK. - /!Art :'-bt?, NWI classification: __ /' __ ' _~_..;._ __ _ Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes A_ No __ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation /J , Soil ___t{_, or Hydrology ~ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes __ No x__ Are Vegetation N , Soil ___1}_, or Hydrology _Af._ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
YesA_ No
Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No L_
Remarks: L-a..ck-".7 fv..;c/fb( °3/ , /1.1oN ~ Pl
-/-o µor-.cl t,,Jt:>...J-e r rtor .,lo CvJ
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.

Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: \ % Cover Sgecies? Status

1. 2.

3. 4.
= Total Cover
Sagling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: \
1,

2. 3.

4. 5.
2,MJ2f = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )

1. A i r l {2/-€$ ?J- res r~ .s-
=;==
FfiC
f7o I '7'~ I • 2. _ ./.(?LJ_ _ {. (>.. a.11..s~r-,"a.... IZ- 08l3. d,.o le " • .s I a.1J o..:fu. $ Z-0 e,c. ,.., , - - ' .. ... - A ., -~ , , ~ T V ., ,-.~ :;!ttt}~IY~~Cl~7;'/~,11r IL
7,
-3
L N tJ ~

8. 9.

10. 11,
ZM<;? 4 / = Total Cover
WoOd'f. Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
~ 1. 7ZA, h ub IA. /'5 )nus FAW , s- 'I

2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Sf ,,,z;- = Total Cover Remarks ~ Mf l,J,._ f O;f\f o..f 0..f1p.P-l' -fof'':Jr<>f # c.

US Army Corps of Engineers
/ow po,~ f- '-f-lN)A. r t~m
c-c-11 .-tfru«:ov1. a-f £lY
.J
Dominance Test worksheet:

Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2- (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: .3 (8)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Ce'? (A/8)
Prevalence Index worksheet:

Total % Cover of: MultiQIY. bY,:

OBL species IL X 1 = Cl-
(j
~r
FACW species x2=
FAC species Z'1 x 3 =
FACU species S" x 4 = "2.0
UPL species ~ x 5 = 0
Column Totals: (A) U'i. (8)
Prevalence Index = BIA = -z.5'8
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
K 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
)(_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
- 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present. unless disturbed or problematic,
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes _A_ No --
/ ,),.,f of tB kAh'II 0-{o6L).

Western Mountains. Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0
,,h,

1.b
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) SOIL Sampling Point· .2. (3
Profile Description: {Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features
{inches} Color (moist} ~ Color (moist) ~__TuruL_ Loc
2 Texture Remarks
0-1 NIA tv/A oro.11rC.;
t-2
~ 50 ? .5"tR--"1f<o_ Z- C M ~/~ /@.~ 48 °rof ~ila,( _ _ --- - ~ IA l WS-01$ 8'.--tY ~ '4 (a_ t.S y{j .!J.Q_ &M_ _M___ :$AP /fa/ r:edu<.Pi N<A{l'it< <n • r at
--- ---------
(Z.LhrflttJ)l'M5 fuf OAJ --- ---- -----
--- - -------- 8 1(
--- --------- 'Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Deoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Linino, M=Matrix.

Hydrlc Soil Indicators: {Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3 :
_ Histosol {A1) i( Sandy Redox {S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2} _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12} _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4} _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks} _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface {A12) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7} wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic.

Restrictive Layer {if present):

Type:

Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes _½_ No ---
Remarks:/Vl~f',,'ro.-/ly 3/"'c j /1,{ J k l'Clic~f (/V el/<2. I' bR:fo r -e__ E<J ~f;/t1 <JW ,fv< ;z,,1~r(\.J.

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Prima!Y Indicators (minimum of one reguired· check all that ai:112I~) Secondaty Indicators (2 or more reguired) _ Surface Water (A 1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9} (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) _ Saturation {A3) _ Salt Crust (B 11) _ Drainage Patterns (B10} _ Water Marks (81) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13} _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1} _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3} _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust {84} _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Iron Deposits {B5} _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAG-Neutral Test {D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks {B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery {B7} _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8}
Field Observations:

Surface Water Present? Yes __ No 4- Depth (inches}:

Water Table Present? Yes __ No x: Depth (inches}:

Saturation Present? Yes __ No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoX- --- /includes caoillarv frinae l Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks: No 111d rco...~r> o-f ~ fl o"c~l~ s?o...llow G-w, Cl US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Projea/Sitec Cr• Sf!; b ~ Ci'J/Cooa>,J4c /h'co./Sa.,, /i{o./(c, Sampliag Dab<' 7/} 9 ( '2JJ Applicant/Owner: wor-k-s Cb.-v1 ir, State: (' A Sampling Point: c..:
lnvestigator(s): Cr 't)(lqll r~ Wood Section, Township, Range: - ---------------- Landform (hillslope, terrace, ~ le.): ____________ Local relief (concave, convex, none): /\._b ,11,12_ Subregion (LRR): f+ Lat: 39-0 55"''5"3, 0~ (( Long: f Z.Z-" 21 '£(,. 9'J " Datum: ___ _ Soil Map Unit Name: Ca.,,wi_(Q;-/-/cl. -&.r11~~ NWI classification: _ ___:_N,~0..._~Af2.....,. _ ____ ..::::'---- Slope (%): / c /o
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ---1s._ No _ _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation 4 . Soil --1:}__, or Hydrology _Af_ significantly disturbed? Are ·Normal Circumstances· present? Yes )(._ No _ _ Are Vegetation _N __ . Soil ~ . or Hydrology~ naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_L_ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Nor
Is the Sampled Area --- No __x_ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes - -- --- Remarks: /\JC I rd f(_ ~ fc c:;. • Uf' - (J ro..d~(ll&-t f- ;Oa_.A._,-f- o ,c. /1~") VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.

Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:

Tree Stratum (Plot size: \ % Cover s12ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species

1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 1- (A)

2. Total Number of Dominant

3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)

4. = Total Cover
Percent of Dominant Species ~1-
SaQling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 2-Mg) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) ~/,',::. La.~ h(f,.J,~ ' s- y FAoJ Prevalence Index worksheet :

1. ' - Total % Cover of: MultiQllr'. blr'.:

2. OBL species n X 1 = 0

3. FACW species 5 x2 = [0 4, FAC species 2) x3= 'f'S"

5. /0 iO s FACU species x4 =
~@ = Total Cover 0 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPL species x5 =

1. /Joie.us I a..~ (A_ ..f (,A~ i.s- y f'rl Column Totals: io (A) l'l.S (B) r, I - ri - '- - rr. \ ' "· > f,,11 ( L,,.__.,,, '-- 7 ,-l'-4< I Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.J2..') I - 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

4. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

5. 'X., 2 - Dominance Test is >50%

6. - 3 - Prevalence Index is :s;3 _01

7. _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting

8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)

9. _ 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants'
10, _ Problematic Hydrophy1ic Vegetation' (Explain)

11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must .30 = Total Cover
be present, unless disturbed or problematic .

Woodlr'. Vine Stratum (Plot size: 2 (vi~ )
'--~1. R.l)tb~ ur-15 ,'11~ /0 y- FAW Hydrophytic

2. Vegetation
No ~ /0 = Total Cover
Present? Yes --
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum ~)
Remarkrf/ory,~ fv.;d!'Of~v;hc <N?JUS Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) SOIL Sampling Point·
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features
{inches) Color (moist} ___%__ Color {moist) ___%__ .J:Y.QlL. Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-l o rqo.. n ic__ __ ---------
/-s3 101/1.. 2.// /00 NIA c/04 /oa.w - /Q05f/. . f:r ,'a,{;uz. J . --------- ' /lo /4-erJ.s I --- --------- ~-!& u;yr; ~ ;v/A --------- -:s.~,,,,., "l - {p/:, f:r'i?-. -r 0a.1,fu_ 20 l'IIA c~ /1).C((&.Ft:.'C'~
1 l . 'S'{_ I --- ---------
--- ---------
--- ---------
- -- ---------
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Oeoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linina. M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3 :
_ Histosol (A 1) _ Sandy Redox (S5} _ 2 cm Muck (A10)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present. _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (FB) unless disturbed or problematic.

Restrictive Layer (if present):

Type:

Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No )< --- Remarks: j\)() 1 I) d / c01..--b0>

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Prima!:i Indicators {minimum of one reguired; check all that a12121:tl Seconda!:i Indicators {2 or more reguired) _ Surface Water (A 1) _ Water•Stained Leaves (89) (except _ Water•Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 4A, and 48) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B 11) _ Drainage Patterns (810) _ Water Marks (81) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) _ Ory.season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (03) _ Iron Deposits (85) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test (05) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:

Surface Water Present? Yes __ No! Depth (inches):

Water Table Present? Yes __ No Depth (inches):

Saturation Present? Yes __ No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -- No K - /includes caoillarv frinoe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections}, if available:

Remarks: /Jo /rvj; c o.:fc rsUS Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ProjecVSite: s-:+-o Cf'<!..$ft' [)r. City/County:&, 'k'c°"/,,5oJt/ll~ampling Date: ?/r 9(!0 ApplicanVOwner: /3o.A/..,,J?~~CPA-eff'1 I ,re., State: v/4 Sampling Point: 3B lnvestigator(s): C~ cy/~ /3,;0 · Section, Township, Range: _________________ _ Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc.}: _________ ___ Local relief (concave, convex. none): ________ Slope(%): __ _ /l C lr-7 / _-.::Zrr - c:, 91 9/''
Subregion(LRR): --'ff--'-------~- - - Lat: 3-=f- 3S:: :J c__,,.<Q 7 Long: !Z2 Z 5?, Datum: ___ _ Soil
Are climatic/
Map Unit
hydrologic
Name Ca,,ncf{t;,t::,.f-ic.£;.-/1:n
conditions on the site typical for t
I'~
his time of year? Yes ___li_ No _ _ (If no,
NW!
explain
classi
in
fi
Remarks.)
cation: ~
Are Vegetation_&_, Soil _f:}_, or Hydrology .L significantly disturbed? . Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Are Vegetation cl_, Soil _t}___, or Hydrology&__ naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks.} No A
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No / CJ '!('J/j,p d ~ L ,UQA, .i,.

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area 1-.J ~/1 l Yes No 1' within a Wetland? Yes~ No __ _ Wetland Hydrology Present? ~ Remarks: Ill! en ~/"\0... ,u...tLf-1-f'WuJ ... A £1CM°5j ~ , d-e>Cl\...€0-d /'":'- ;/ '..l C. -1,, c,~ o,~,14, -~"" -·~ .Al.au-if- lb . -~ e.tt·~, o~ E/J_ l?o VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.

Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:

Tree Stratum (Plot size: I % Cover SQecies? Status Number of Dominant Species

1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: I (A)

2. Total Number of Dominant

3. Species Across All Strata: z_ (8)

4. SaQling/Shrub Stratum (P~ t size: "'2,_,<,t {Zf = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: so (A/8}
)
y FAcvJ Prevalence Index worksheet:

1.~51/c..< /Q.7j)/"7~ I 5 <-O Total % Cover of: MultiQl'.Y'. b~{ 2. &8 OBL species X 1 = 0

3. FACW species x2 = lW
4, FAC species 0 x3 = 5. /0 ~o (aQ FACU species x4 = = Total Cover 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPLspecies x5=

1. Column Totals: --=10 (A} I t~D (8)

2. Prevalence Index = BIA = /4:'.'.. '28

3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

4. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

5. _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%

6. ){ 3 - Prevalence Index is ::.3.0'

7. _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting

8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)

9. - 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants'

10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain}

11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must VVt ¢ = Total Cover
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woll;;,ine Stratum (Plot size: )

1. bv0 u,r.s,/'lut 10 y · Fflc<J Hydrophytic

2. Vegetation
Yes -4- LO = Total Cover Present? No --
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum ~ D
Remarks:./)~ w-, 1 low SCl'fAb CO(A..(L,t> f\..;t.a..;·0,1·~ ofI (o&v.e,r- Plev, Pa.A.I of' t:)C(\~AI I _/
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) SOIL Sampling Point: _3 __ /3 __
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color {moist} ~ Color (moist) ~~ Loc2 Texture Remarks a - /0 Z..S'/f Z-- (jo I 01 I<- 5"/& _jQ___h___M_ s~n~ I aa...""""'---' LO · l8f' Z .") -1/! ~ !_ot./L -s /ff ___.s:._ C-- 11__ :':P-,,cl~c·1~;1 NduU!.~ ' --- -------- -
--- - --------
--- --- - -----
--- - --------
--- ---------
- -- ---------
'Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Deoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Linino, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soits3 :
_ Histosol (A 1) J: Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic.

Restrictive Layer (if present):

Type:

Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes .¼-- No -- Remarks: /6.clu u,c( .;5<vl'\~ so, / c-J/ Nd<i,rHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (89) (except _ High Water Table (A2)
_ Saturation (A3)
MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48)
_ Salt Crust (B 11)
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2,
4A, and 48)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Iron Deposits (85) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAG-Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) )!:,.. Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:

Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
includes c •
Yes __ Not Depth (inches):

Yes __ No Depth (inches): ____ _
Yes __ No Depth (inches): ____ _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Describe Recor e a a (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
(A .12.. --,t tx.f. ,~ c.e
Remarks~-/~vi Ge l)-{ .LQQ./.> oeA.J /
a.,1d q<::_ rdr~ > h{//ow /t_e,r, '2-.,-- -
NoL
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) ProjecVSite:

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes1= No '
Yes ___ No=x=
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes ___ No ___K
Remark~:A-f .....e.«Je o ~ w///ow5 J ~jUU\A.J
sa1 r ;r, ~ ~ ~ro GIA/
0 VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.

Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: _____ _, % Cover Species? Status

1. fks.(?f,t0C7f>M1-.S MO.,CroCJ),rpo-:- ~o 'i NL

2. --------- ------------ ------

3. ------------- ----- ---------

4. ---------------------------
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: _____ _,

1. fuli,x / o.,s ;o/eRIS i

2. - ------------ ----------- ---

3. ------------------ ---------

4. ------------------ --- ------

5. ------------------- - - ------ 2-0 = Total Cover

2. ¥¥,':....L...:~"'--';-.p=.J=c.::,,______ :r Y

3. '-'-''-'-'"""""'-=->--'--=""--"L.>..------- -- __ ,,.,,,3..,__ -1-Y-- ~L..L.::~ 4, ------------------- --------

5. - ----------------------- ---

6. ----------------- - ---------

7. ------------------- --------

8. --- ------------------------

9. -------- ---------- ------- --

10. ---------------------- --------

11. ------------------- -----------
IO = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: _____ _,

1.&/,u,5 urs >o ,,,s Y. f!ICU

2. --------------- ---
= Total Cover
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
US Army Corps of Engineers
Dominance Test worksheet:

Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG:

Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:

Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Prevalence Index worksheet:
zo
Total% Cover of: Multiply by:

OBL species 0 X 1 = 0
FACW species 2.0 x2= 40
FAC species 0 x 3= 0
FACU species z,5 x4 = (00
UPL species -=ro x5 = :sSO
Column Totals: \\ S- (A) ~'10
Prevalence Index = BIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is S3.01
(A)
(B)
(NB)
(B)
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5- Wetland Non-Vascular Plants'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No _L_
Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) SOIL Sampling Point·
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) - Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color lmoistl ---22_ Color {moist) ---22_ ....IyQL Loc2 Texture Remarks O-/ ?\JIA NIA - -------- o~anlcLOYR. 3/Z- ' l- 0 100 no r--e,dQC --------- .sa.. ~ I Q::).IVt, lo-/8f Z,SY 4/2- 90 7-.S'/ R. s/48 Q_~_B_ ~ <;a 118 ,rel'¥ do."1/411 I --- ---------
--- ---------
--- ---------
--- ---------
- -- --------- 1
Type: C=Concentration, D=Deoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Linina, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3 :
_ Histosol (A1) ){_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic.

Restrictive Layer (if present):

Type:

Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes -A- No --
Remarks/Waro11/1q__ !J:; ~d r-c, poss - re,//cf 0.""" W-.12..HPJ:- (0/f (/ f'-f--, Oc.,,t-::J ~re 6-W fli~f'J dvn{J EQ_ ~S/!iJ 0:::,/l«lcfv.c ,c,10 .,,.

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Primary Indicators {minimum of one reguired; check all that ai:ii:il:tl Seconda!}'. Indicators {2 or more reguired) _ Surface Water (A 1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B1 1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (03) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAG-Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:

Surface Water Present? Yes __ No _K_ Depth (inches):

Water Table Present? Yes _ _ No ± Depth (inches):

Saturation Present? Yes __ No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -- No X (includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks: /1__9./r'c~J e,e,,vJ'c;:lenc..e o+ h:JIA GWI /10 f Cu r N P1. f-: , US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ProjecUSite: C l'Q 5/t 7)1'. City/County: Pac. ,"h~()..I '5a./\ Mo:fe,, Sampling Date: "2/t 9 /zo IA.br-/:::.s CQ,/1.,,,jfr, / l)c_, State: Cit Sampling Point: .......:;3~:P"---- r.s Utbocf fs10 Section, Township, Range: _________________ _ J l .L ~
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ____________ Local relief (concave, convex, none): )'VVPl.11-- Slope(%): ___ I<..' __ Subregion(LRR): ;4 Lat: '3"':/- 03)' S'3Af' Long: J"Z.2.0 2'j',<;:},ZS1I Datum: ___ _ Soil Map Unit Name: Ct>--nd &.Sr'.c£- /3()4../)/la..k NWI classification A/c(A...

Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes L_ No __ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation JV ~, Soil fl , or Hydrology JJ, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances· present? Yes K__ No Are Vegetation --;::;--- _ _ , Soil~. or Hydrology -;::r-- naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. -.i
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:

Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
5Mf5 Absolute
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover

1. t:J.-;t.1;)/U.ro C fie_a,ti1 Ma..Cro care°'- , -40

2. 3.

4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. -10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 2-M ff )

1. Co r-+o..d.v, la._ ',,.f,,..~ JO r-. I - '-' -· ~
- ,

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. ,zo
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 2Me) )
~1 . Pvvb~s. t&:..i'.i.[a ~ S /0

2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum "70
Remarks:

Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes ___ No _&_
Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:

S12ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species '{_ ('JL- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: JZ5 (A) '
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All S 3 trata: (8)
= Total Cover
Percent of Dominant Species J2f That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/8) Prevalence Index worksheet:

Total% Cover of: Multi[1ly by:

OBL species + X 1 =
FACW species x2=
fO FAC species x3=
FACU species 'Z-0 x4 = &?
= Total Cover
UP 10 Z.00 L species x5 =
y FA<.,U Column Totals: <oo (A) Z.80 (8)
\ I t--/\-
" -1.t- n Prevalence Index = B/A = I
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
- 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
- 3 - Prevalence Index is ,;;3_01
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
- 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
= Total Cover
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
'L FAc.u Hydrophytic
Vegetation
No }( = Total Cover
Present? Yes --
/\Inv,. - h..1dro f~ 1-f L V{'~ .

US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) SOIL Sampling Point· 3J:>
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features
{inches) Color (moist) ~ Color (moist} ~....IwL_ Loc2 Texture Remarks n-18 -z.5'.f._1/4 !1.Q_ ~f'<f-4
z, 'SY 1Lt _a_ I 0'/ P.. 5/8 2.. & ~ 5o.hi"-'J w/ cl~ /r,c{ur;a,tf . ' ./ - - - ---------
--- - --- -----
- -- ---------
--- --------- --- - -------- --- --------- 1
Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Deoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Linina, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3 :
_ Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck {A10)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (A 12) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1 ) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic.

Restrictive Layer (if present):

Type:

Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X. ---
Remarks:
:5~ I'--€.. (/ C -h,,,.(>,,/ I ...R,,,,v-, 'au... e,'l u. o+- ?o...sl- ~"jk &w

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Prima!}'. Indicators {minimum of one reguired; check all that a1212ly) Seconda!}'. Indicators {2 or more reguired) _ Surface Water (A 1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table {A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (03) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAG-Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks (07) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:

Surface Water Present? Yes __ No :i.._ Depth (inches):

Water Table Present? Yes __ No ...,¼_ Depth (inches):

Saturation Present? Yes __ No L Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes --- NA, (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available:

Remarks:

No /ref IC<>---/or $
us Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Applicant/Owner: State:

Investigator(s):

Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): <1
Subregion (LRR): Lat:

Soil Map Unit Name:

X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Yes No X
Yes No X Yes X
Yes No X
)

1. 2. (A)

3. 4. (B)
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (A/B)

1. 2.

3. 4. x 1 =

5. x 2 =
x 3 =
x 4 =

1. x 5 =

2. Column Totals: (A) (B)

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. Woody Vine Stratum

1. 2.

Yes X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region See ERDC/EL TR-10-3; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 11/30/2024
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Tree Stratum
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? No
No
2 2m
5 Remarks:

Indicator
Status
0 2
VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.
(Plot size:
1 UPL
Herb Stratum
Oxalis pes-caprae
0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
2m
naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) (Plot size:

Yes
Number of Dominant Species That
FACW Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
significantly disturbed?
No criteria are met.

Remarks:
5 FACU species
FAC species
OBL species
FACU

4.49 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1
(Explain)
98 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1
4 - Morphological Adaptations1(Provide supporting
=Total Cover
)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? No
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
(Plot size:
10 Total % Cover of:
=Total Cover
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
20 Multiply by:
20 Prevalence Index = B/A =
0 No
3UHYDOHQFH,QGH[LV”1
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

UPL species
FACW species
Sampling Date:

Sampling Point:

Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
4/4/2022
Brendan and Eamon Murphy
Chris Rogers
terrace
City/County: Pacifica / San Mateo
none
Long:
2m
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? No S10 T4S R6W
CA SP-1
concave
Section, Township, Range:

0.0%
)
2m )
Phoenix canariensis
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 0
Project/Site: 570 Crespi Drive
LRR A, MLRA 4B
NWI classification:

Dominant
Species?
60 50
10 UPL

37.595511
UPL
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
-122.500189 Datum:

Urban Land-Orthents, cut and fill complex 0-5% slopes
(Plot size:

Myoporum laetum
Salix lasiolepis
Yes
=Total Cover
1 2 No
Non-hydric vegetation dominates sample location. Arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis; FACW) extend over sample point from plants rooted in area mapped as wetland.

Percent of Dominant Species That
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5 Total Number of Dominant Species
Across All Strata:

Dominance Test worksheet:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Yes
265
305
53 68
=Total Cover
Rubus ursinus
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

ENG FORM 6116-9, JUL 2018 Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Sampling Point:
%% Type1 Loc2
100
100
Type:

Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X
Surface Water Present? Yes X
Water Table Present? Yes X
Saturation Present? Yes X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X SOIL SP-1
coarse gravelly fill with 50% 2.5Y 3/3
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

Coarse gravelly fill from backyard expansion, construction of wet weather equalization basin, or historic.

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 6-18
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Water Marks (B1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Salt Crust (B11)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2
Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Saturation (A3)
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
(inches) Color (moist)
10YR 3/4
10YR 2/1
Color (moist)
0-6
Surface Water (A1)
Loamy/Clayey
Matrix
Texture
Depth Redox Features
Remarks:

Field Observations:
(includes capillary fringe)
Shallow depression between backyard that was filled within drainage easement and berm at edge of City's parking lot. No evidence of ponding or inundation for long duration.

No
No
No
Depth (inches):

Depth (inches):

Depth (inches):

High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Restrictive Layer (if observed):
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR A, E)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D, G)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)
1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

2.5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S2) (LRR G)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
ENG FORM 6116-9, JUL 2018 Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Applicant/Owner: State:

Investigator(s):

Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): <1
Subregion (LRR): Lat:

Soil Map Unit Name:

X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Yes No X
Yes No X Yes X
Yes No X
)

1. 2. (A)

3. 4. (B)
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (A/B)

1. 2.

3. 4. x 1 =

5. x 2 =
x 3 =
x 4 =

1. x 5 =

2. Column Totals: (A) (B)

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. Woody Vine Stratum

1. 2.

Yes X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region See ERDC/EL TR-10-3; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 11/30/2024
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Tree Stratum
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? No
3 2m
30 Remarks:

Indicator
Status
1 2
VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.
(Plot size:

Zantedeschia aethiopica
UPL
Herb Stratum
1 No
Oxalis pes-caprae
1 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
2m
naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) (Plot size:

Yes
Number of Dominant Species That
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
significantly disturbed?
Slight topographic rise at back of expanded backyard. Criteria not met.

Remarks:
31 FACU species
FAC species
No
OBL species
FACU

3.26 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Amphilophium buccinatorium
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1
(Explain)
98 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1
4 - Morphological Adaptations1(Provide supporting
1 UPL
=Total Cover
)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? No
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
(Plot size:
20 Total % Cover of:
=Total Cover
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
120
Multiply by:
40 Prevalence Index = B/A =
0 3UHYDOHQFH,QGH[LV”1
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

UPL species
FACW species
Sampling Date:

Sampling Point:

Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
4/4/2022
Brendan and Eamon Murphy
Chris Rogers
terrace
City/County: Pacifica / San Mateo
none
Long:
2m
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? No S10 T4S R6W
CA SP-2
concave
Section, Township, Range:

50.0%
)
2m )
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 1
Project/Site: 570 Crespi Drive
LRR A, MLRA 4B
NWI classification:

Dominant
Species?
20 20 FACW

37.597490
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
-122.500134 Datum:

Urban Land-Orthents, cut and fill complex 0-5% slopes
(Plot size:

Salix lasiolepis Yes
=Total Cover
OBL
2 No
Non-hydric vegetation dominates sample location. Arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis; FACW) extend over sample point from plants rooted in area mapped as wetland.

Percent of Dominant Species That
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
30 Total Number of Dominant Species
Across All Strata:

Dominance Test worksheet:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Yes
15 176
3 54
=Total Cover
Rubus ursinus
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

ENG FORM 6116-9, JUL 2018 Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Sampling Point:
%% Type1 Loc2
100
98 98 2 C M
Type:

Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water Present? Yes X
Water Table Present? Yes X
Saturation Present? Yes X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X SOIL SP-2
Coarse gravelly clay; inclusions (not redox) of 10YR 3/2 Sandy clay loam
Prominent redox concentrations
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

Coarse gravelly fill from backyard expansion.

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 9-15
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Water Marks (B1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Salt Crust (B11)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2
Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Saturation (A3)
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
(inches) Color (moist)

2.5Y 3/2
10YR 5/6
Color (moist)

7.5YR 5/8
0-9
Surface Water (A1)
Loamy/Clayey

2.5Y 3/2
Matrix
Texture
15-18 Sandy
Depth Redox Features
Remarks:

Field Observations:
(includes capillary fringe)
Slight topographic rise against back backyard fence. No hydrology indicators. The sample point likely experiences periods of inundation or saturation following significant storm events, but it is not a persistent condition.

No
No
No
Depth (inches):

Depth (inches):

Depth (inches):

High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Restrictive Layer (if observed):
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR A, E)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D, G)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)
1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

2.5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S2) (LRR G)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
ENG FORM 6116-9, JUL 2018 Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Applicant/Owner: State:

Investigator(s):

Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): <1
Subregion (LRR): Lat:

Soil Map Unit Name:

X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Yes x No
Yes X No Yes X
Yes X No
)

1. 2. (A)

3. 4. (B)
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (A/B)

1. 2.

3. 4. x 1 =

5. x 2 =
x 3 =
x 4 =

1. x 5 =

2. Column Totals: (A) (B)

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8. X

9. 10.

11. Woody Vine Stratum

1. 2.

Yes x
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region See ERDC/EL TR-10-3; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 11/30/2024
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Tree Stratum
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? No
2m
15 Remarks:

Indicator
Status
1 2
VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.

Herb Stratum (Plot size:
0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
2m
naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) (Plot size:

Yes
Number of Dominant Species That
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
significantly disturbed?
All three criteria are met.

Remarks:
15 FACU species
FAC species
OBL species
FACU

2.40 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1
(Explain)
65 5 - Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1
4 - Morphological Adaptations1(Provide supporting
=Total Cover
)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? No
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
(Plot size:
60 Total % Cover of:
=Total Cover
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
60 Multiply by:
120
Prevalence Index = B/A =
0 3UHYDOHQFH,QGH[LV”1
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

UPL species
FACW species
Sampling Date:

Sampling Point:

Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
4/4/2022
Brendan and Eamon Murphy
Chris Rogers
terrace
City/County: Pacifica / San Mateo
none
Long:
2m
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? No S10 T4S R6W
CA SP-3
concave
Section, Township, Range:

50.0%
)
2m )
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 0
Project/Site: 570 Crespi Drive
LRR A, MLRA 4B
NWI classification:

Dominant
Species?
60 60 FACW

37.597518
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
-122.500056 Datum:

Urban Land-Orthents, cut and fill complex 0-5% slopes
(Plot size:

Salix lasiolepis Yes
=Total Cover
Non-hydric vegetation dominates sample location. Willow canopy extends over sample location from plants rooted in area mapped as wetland.

Percent of Dominant Species That
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
15 Total Number of Dominant Species
Across All Strata:

Dominance Test worksheet:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Yes
0 180
0 75
=Total Cover
Rubus ursinus
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

ENG FORM 6116-9, JUL 2018 Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Sampling Point:
%% Type1 Loc2
100
48 2 C M
X
Type:

Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X
X
X
X
Surface Water Present? Yes X
Water Table Present? Yes X
Saturation Present? Yes X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No SOIL SP-3
Silty clay, organic; roots and worms.

Gravelly clay; 45% 2.5Y 4/2, 5% 10YR 2/1
groundwater
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

Native soil, not fill (urban land/orthents) as mapped. Evidence of hydric soil resulting from long duration saturation and/or inundation.

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 6-15
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Water Marks (B1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Salt Crust (B11)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2
Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Saturation (A3)
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
(inches) Color (moist)

2.5Y 3/2
10YR 2/1
Color (moist)

2.5YR 3/6
0-6
Surface Water (A1)
Loamy/Clayey
Matrix
Texture
15-20
Depth Redox Features
Remarks:

Field Observations:
(includes capillary fringe)
Ground slope to north where standing water is accumulated. Seaonal high water table and evidence of long duration saturation and/or inundation.

No
No
No
Depth (inches):

Depth (inches):

Depth (inches):

High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Restrictive Layer (if observed):
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR A, E)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D, G)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)
1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

2.5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S2) (LRR G)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
ENG FORM 6116-9, JUL 2018 Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast – Version 2.0

1.b
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Representative Photographs
S Sample point 1A on wetland/upland boundary (2020).

S Sample point 1B in upland (2020).

1.b
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
S Upland/seasonal wetland boundary, near sample point 1B (2023).

S Sample point 2A in wetland, looking NE (2020).

1.b
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
S Near sample point 2A in wetland, looking SW (2023).

S Sample point 2B in upland (2020).

1.b
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
S Sample point 3C in upland (2020).

S Sample point 3D in upland (2020).

1.b
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
S Sample point SP-3 in willow wetland (2023).

1.b
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
S Sample point SP-2 in upland (2023).

1.b
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
Soils Report

1.b
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 8QLWHG6WDWHV
'HSDUWPHQWRI
$JULFXOWXUH
$SURGXFWRIWKH1DWLRQDO
&RRSHUDWLYH6RLO6XUYH\
DMRLQWHIIRUWRIWKH8QLWHG
6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRI
$JULFXOWXUHDQGRWKHU
)HGHUDODJHQFLHV6WDWH
DJHQFLHVLQFOXGLQJWKH
$JULFXOWXUDO([SHULPHQW
6WDWLRQVDQGORFDO

SDUWLFLSDQWV
&XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH
5HSRUWIRU
6DQ0DWHR&RXQW\(DVWHUQ
3DUWDQG6DQ)UDQFLVFR
&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD
1DWXUDO
5HVRXUFHV
&RQVHUYDWLRQ
6HUYLFH
-XO\
USDA
??:77i7ii'5
NRCS

1.b
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 3UHIDFH
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
KWWS
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRYZSV
SRUWDOQUFVPDLQVRLOVKHDOWK
DQGFHUWDLQFRQVHUYDWLRQDQGHQJLQHHULQJ
DSSOLFDWLRQV)RUPRUHGHWDLOHGLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDFW\RXUORFDO86'$6HUYLFH&HQWHU

KWWSV
RIILFHVVFHJRYXVGDJRYORFDWRUDSS"DJHQF\ QUFV
RU\RXU15&66WDWH6RLO
6FLHQWLVW
KWWS
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRYZSVSRUWDOQUFVGHWDLOVRLOVFRQWDFWXV" FLG QUFVSB


*UHDWGLIIHUHQFHVLQVRLOSURSHUWLHVFDQRFFXUZLWKLQVKRUWGLVWDQFHV6RPHVRLOVDUH VHDVRQDOO\ZHWRUVXEMHFWWRIORRGLQJ6RPHDUHWRRXQVWDEOHWREHXVHGDVD IRXQGDWLRQIRUEXLOGLQJVRUURDGV&OD\H\RUZHWVRLOVDUHSRRUO\VXLWHGWRXVHDV VHSWLFWDQNDEVRUSWLRQILHOGV$KLJKZDWHUWDEOHPDNHVDVRLOSRRUO\VXLWHGWR EDVHPHQWVRUXQGHUJURXQGLQVWDOODWLRQV
7KH1DWLRQDO&RRSHUDWLYH6RLO6XUYH\LVDMRLQWHIIRUWRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV 'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUHDQGRWKHU)HGHUDODJHQFLHV6WDWHDJHQFLHVLQFOXGLQJWKH $JULFXOWXUDO([SHULPHQW6WDWLRQVDQGORFDODJHQFLHV7KH1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV &RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH
15&6
KDVOHDGHUVKLSIRUWKH)HGHUDOSDUWRIWKH1DWLRQDO
&RRSHUDWLYH6RLO6XUYH\
,QIRUPDWLRQDERXWVRLOVLVXSGDWHGSHULRGLFDOO\8SGDWHGLQIRUPDWLRQLVDYDLODEOH WKURXJKWKH15&6:HE6RLO6XUYH\WKHVLWHIRURIILFLDOVRLOVXUYH\LQIRUPDWLRQ 7KH86'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH
86'$
SURKLELWVGLVFULPLQDWLRQLQDOOLWV
SURJUDPVDQGDFWLYLWLHVRQWKHEDVLVRIUDFHFRORUQDWLRQDORULJLQDJHGLVDELOLW\ DQGZKHUHDSSOLFDEOHVH[PDULWDOVWDWXVIDPLOLDOVWDWXVSDUHQWDOVWDWXVUHOLJLRQ VH[XDORULHQWDWLRQJHQHWLFLQIRUPDWLRQSROLWLFDOEHOLHIVUHSULVDORUEHFDXVHDOORUD SDUWRIDQLQGLYLGXDO
VLQFRPHLVGHULYHGIURPDQ\SXEOLFDVVLVWDQFHSURJUDP 1RW
DOOSURKLELWHGEDVHVDSSO\WRDOOSURJUDPV
3HUVRQVZLWKGLVDELOLWLHVZKRUHTXLUH


1.b
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) DOWHUQDWLYHPHDQVIRUFRPPXQLFDWLRQRISURJUDPLQIRUPDWLRQ %UDLOOHODUJHSULQW
DXGLRWDSHHWF
VKRXOGFRQWDFW86'$
V7$5*(7&HQWHUDW


YRLFH
DQG7''
7RILOHDFRPSODLQWRIGLVFULPLQDWLRQZULWHWR86'$'LUHFWRU2IILFHRI &LYLO5LJKWV,QGHSHQGHQFH$YHQXH6::DVKLQJWRQ'& RU
FDOO



YRLFH
RU


7''
86'$LVDQHTXDORSSRUWXQLW\
SURYLGHUDQGHPSOR\HU


1.b
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) &RQWHQWV
3UHIDFH  +RZ6RLO6XUYH\V$UH0DGH 6RLO0DS  6RLO0DS

/HJHQG 0DS8QLW/HJHQG  0DS8QLW'HVFULSWLRQV  6DQ0DWHR&RXQW\(DVWHUQ3DUWDQG6DQ)UDQFLVFR&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD  
²&DQGOHVWLFN%DUQDEHFRPSOH[WRSHUFHQWVORSHV ²8UEDQODQG  ²8UEDQODQG2UWKHQWVFXWDQGILOOFRPSOH[WRSHUFHQWVORSHV  5HIHUHQFHV



1.b
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) +RZ6RLO6XUYH\V$UH0DGH
6RLOVXUYH\VDUHPDGHWRSURYLGHLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKHVRLOVDQGPLVFHOODQHRXV DUHDVLQDVSHFLILFDUHD7KH\LQFOXGHDGHVFULSWLRQRIWKHVRLOVDQGPLVFHOODQHRXV DUHDVDQGWKHLUORFDWLRQRQWKHODQGVFDSHDQGWDEOHVWKDWVKRZVRLOSURSHUWLHVDQG OLPLWDWLRQVDIIHFWLQJYDULRXVXVHV6RLOVFLHQWLVWVREVHUYHGWKHVWHHSQHVVOHQJWK DQGVKDSHRIWKHVORSHV
WKHJHQHUDOSDWWHUQRIGUDLQDJH
WKHNLQGVRIFURSVDQG
QDWLYHSODQWV
DQGWKHNLQGVRIEHGURFN7KH\REVHUYHGDQGGHVFULEHGPDQ\VRLO SURILOHV$VRLOSURILOHLVWKHVHTXHQFHRIQDWXUDOOD\HUVRUKRUL]RQVLQDVRLO7KH SURILOHH[WHQGVIURPWKHVXUIDFHGRZQLQWRWKHXQFRQVROLGDWHGPDWHULDOLQZKLFKWKH VRLOIRUPHGRUIURPWKHVXUIDFHGRZQWREHGURFN7KHXQFRQVROLGDWHGPDWHULDOLV GHYRLGRIURRWVDQGRWKHUOLYLQJRUJDQLVPVDQGKDVQRWEHHQFKDQJHGE\RWKHU ELRORJLFDODFWLYLW\
&XUUHQWO\VRLOVDUHPDSSHGDFFRUGLQJWRWKHERXQGDULHVRIPDMRUODQGUHVRXUFH DUHDV
0/5$V
0/5$VDUHJHRJUDSKLFDOO\DVVRFLDWHGODQGUHVRXUFHXQLWVWKDW VKDUHFRPPRQFKDUDFWHULVWLFVUHODWHGWRSK\VLRJUDSK\JHRORJ\FOLPDWHZDWHU UHVRXUFHVVRLOVELRORJLFDOUHVRXUFHVDQGODQGXVHV
86'$
6RLOVXUYH\
DUHDVW\SLFDOO\FRQVLVWRISDUWVRIRQHRUPRUH0/5$
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

7D[RQRPLFFODVVHVDUHFRQFHSWV(DFKWD[RQRPLFFODVVKDVDVHWRIVRLO FKDUDFWHULVWLFVZLWKSUHFLVHO\GHILQHGOLPLWV7KHFODVVHVDUHXVHGDVDEDVLVIRU FRPSDULVRQWRFODVVLI\VRLOVV\VWHPDWLFDOO\6RLOWD[RQRP\WKHV\VWHPRIWD[RQRPLF FODVVLILFDWLRQXVHGLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLVEDVHGPDLQO\RQWKHNLQGDQGFKDUDFWHU RIVRLOSURSHUWLHVDQGWKHDUUDQJHPHQWRIKRUL]RQVZLWKLQWKHSURILOH$IWHUWKHVRLO 

1.b
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) VFLHQWLVWVFODVVLILHGDQGQDPHGWKHVRLOVLQWKHVXUYH\DUHDWKH\FRPSDUHGWKH LQGLYLGXDOVRLOVZLWKVLPLODUVRLOVLQWKHVDPHWD[RQRPLFFODVVLQRWKHUDUHDVVRWKDW WKH\FRXOGFRQILUPGDWDDQGDVVHPEOHDGGLWLRQDOGDWDEDVHGRQH[SHULHQFHDQG UHVHDUFK
7KHREMHFWLYHRIVRLOPDSSLQJLVQRWWRGHOLQHDWHSXUHPDSXQLWFRPSRQHQWV WKH
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
3UHGLFWLRQVDERXWVRLOEHKDYLRUDUHEDVHGQRWRQO\RQVRLOSURSHUWLHVEXWDOVRRQ VXFKYDULDEOHVDVFOLPDWHDQGELRORJLFDODFWLYLW\6RLOFRQGLWLRQVDUHSUHGLFWDEOHRYHU ORQJSHULRGVRIWLPHEXWWKH\DUHQRWSUHGLFWDEOHIURP\HDUWR\HDU)RUH[DPSOH VRLOVFLHQWLVWVFDQSUHGLFWZLWKDIDLUO\KLJKGHJUHHRIDFFXUDF\WKDWDJLYHQVRLOZLOO KDYHDKLJKZDWHUWDEOHZLWKLQFHUWDLQGHSWKVLQPRVW\HDUVEXWWKH\FDQQRWSUHGLFW WKDWDKLJKZDWHUWDEOHZLOODOZD\VEHDWDVSHFLILFOHYHOLQWKHVRLORQDVSHFLILFGDWH $IWHUVRLOVFLHQWLVWVORFDWHGDQGLGHQWLILHGWKHVLJQLILFDQWQDWXUDOERGLHVRIVRLOLQWKH VXUYH\DUHDWKH\GUHZWKHERXQGDULHVRIWKHVHERGLHVRQDHULDOSKRWRJUDSKVDQG &XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) LGHQWLILHGHDFKDVDVSHFLILFPDSXQLW$HULDOSKRWRJUDSKVVKRZWUHHVEXLOGLQJV ILHOGVURDGVDQGULYHUVDOORIZKLFKKHOSLQORFDWLQJERXQGDULHVDFFXUDWHO\ &XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 6RLO0DS
7KHVRLOPDSVHFWLRQLQFOXGHVWKHVRLOPDSIRUWKHGHILQHGDUHDRILQWHUHVWDOLVWRI VRLOPDSXQLWVRQWKHPDSDQGH[WHQWRIHDFKPDSXQLWDQGFDUWRJUDSKLFV\PEROV GLVSOD\HGRQWKHPDS$OVRSUHVHQWHGDUHYDULRXVPHWDGDWDDERXWGDWDXVHGWR SURGXFHWKHPDSDQGDGHVFULSWLRQRIHDFKVRLOPDSXQLW 

1.b
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

&XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW
6RLO0DS
 
     

 
     


 
          
 
          ƒ


1
ƒ


:
ƒ


1
ƒ



:
ƒ


1
ƒ


:
ƒ


1
ƒ



: 1
0DSSURMHFWLRQ
:HE0HUFDWRU&RUQHUFRRUGLQDWHV
:*6(GJHWLFV
870=RQH1:*6
    
)HHW
    
0HWHUV
0DS6FDOH


LISULQWHGRQ$ODQGVFDSH
[
VKHHW
6RLO0DSPD\QRWEHYDOLGDWWKLVVFDOH

1.b
Packet Pg. 845
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 0$3/(*(1' 0$3,1)250$7,21
$UHDRI,QWHUHVW
$2,

$UHDRI,QWHUHVW
$2,

6RLOV
6RLO0DS8QLW3RO\JRQV6RLO0DS8QLW/LQHV6RLO0DS8QLW3RLQWV 6SHFLDO3RLQW)HDWXUHV
%ORZRXW%RUURZ3LW&OD\6SRW&ORVHG'HSUHVVLRQ*UDYHO3LW*UDYHOO\6SRW/DQGILOO/DYD)ORZ0DUVKRUVZDPS0LQHRU4XDUU\0LVFHOODQHRXV:DWHU3HUHQQLDO:DWHU5RFN2XWFURS6DOLQH6SRW6DQG\6SRW6HYHUHO\(URGHG6SRW6LQNKROH6OLGHRU6OLS6RGLF6SRW 6SRLO$UHD6WRQ\6SRW9HU\6WRQ\6SRW:HW6SRW2WKHU6SHFLDO/LQH)HDWXUHV :DWHU)HDWXUHV
6WUHDPVDQG&DQDOV
7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ
5DLOV,QWHUVWDWH+LJKZD\V865RXWHV0DMRU5RDGV/RFDO5RDGV %DFNJURXQG
$HULDO3KRWRJUDSK\
7KHVRLOVXUYH\VWKDWFRPSULVH\RXU$2,ZHUHPDSSHGDW :DUQLQJ
6RLO0DSPD\QRWEHYDOLGDWWKLVVFDOH(QODUJHPHQWRIPDSVEH\RQGWKHVFDOHRIPDSSLQJFDQFDXVHPLVXQGHUVWDQGLQJRIWKHGHWDLORIPDSSLQJDQGDFFXUDF\RIVRLOOLQHSODFHPHQW7KHPDSVGRQRWVKRZWKHVPDOODUHDVRIFRQWUDVWLQJVRLOVWKDWFRXOGKDYHEHHQVKRZQDWDPRUHGHWDLOHGVFDOH3OHDVHUHO\RQWKHEDUVFDOHRQHDFKPDSVKHHWIRUPDSPHDVXUHPHQWV6RXUFHRI0DS  1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH:HE6RLO6XUYH\85/ &RRUGLQDWH6\VWHP
 :HE0HUFDWRU
(36*

0DSVIURPWKH:HE6RLO6XUYH\DUHEDVHGRQWKH:HE0HUFDWRUSURMHFWLRQZKLFKSUHVHUYHVGLUHFWLRQDQGVKDSHEXWGLVWRUWVGLVWDQFHDQGDUHD$SURMHFWLRQWKDWSUHVHUYHVDUHDVXFKDVWKH$OEHUVHTXDODUHDFRQLFSURMHFWLRQVKRXOGEHXVHGLIPRUHDFFXUDWHFDOFXODWLRQVRIGLVWDQFHRUDUHDDUHUHTXLUHG7KLVSURGXFWLVJHQHUDWHGIURPWKH86'$15&6FHUWLILHGGDWDDVRIWKHYHUVLRQGDWH V
OLVWHGEHORZ6RLO6XUYH\$UHD
 6DQ0DWHR&RXQW\(DVWHUQ3DUWDQG6DQ)UDQFLVFR&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD6XUYH\$UHD'DWD  9HUVLRQ0D\
6RLOPDSXQLWVDUHODEHOHG
DVVSDFHDOORZV
IRUPDSVFDOHV
RUODUJHU'DWH
V
DHULDOLPDJHVZHUHSKRWRJUDSKHG
 $SU

²-XQ
7KHRUWKRSKRWRRURWKHUEDVHPDSRQZKLFKWKHVRLOOLQHVZHUHFRPSLOHGDQGGLJLWL]HGSUREDEO\GLIIHUVIURPWKHEDFNJURXQG &XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW

[OjofJ:~<J ~ I
l illl l I
□ □ □ * 0 0 > + :•:

1.b
Packet Pg. 846
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 0$3/(*(1' 0$3,1)250$7,21
LPDJHU\GLVSOD\HGRQWKHVHPDSV$VDUHVXOWVRPHPLQRUVKLIWLQJRIPDSXQLWERXQGDULHVPD\EHHYLGHQW &XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 847
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 0DS8QLW/HJHQG
0DS8QLW6\PERO 0DS8QLW1DPH $FUHVLQ$2, 3HUFHQWRI$2, 
&DQGOHVWLFN%DUQDEHFRPSOH[
WRSHUFHQWVORSHV
 
 8UEDQODQG  
 8UEDQODQG2UWKHQWVFXWDQGILOO
FRPSOH[WRSHUFHQW
VORSHV
 
7RWDOVIRU$UHDRI,QWHUHVW  
0DS8QLW'HVFULSWLRQV
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
7KHSUHVHQFHRIPLQRUFRPSRQHQWVLQDPDSXQLWLQQRZD\GLPLQLVKHVWKH XVHIXOQHVVRUDFFXUDF\RIWKHGDWD7KHREMHFWLYHRIPDSSLQJLVQRWWRGHOLQHDWH SXUHWD[RQRPLFFODVVHVEXWUDWKHUWRVHSDUDWHWKHODQGVFDSHLQWRODQGIRUPVRU &XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) ODQGIRUPVHJPHQWVWKDWKDYHVLPLODUXVHDQGPDQDJHPHQWUHTXLUHPHQWV7KH GHOLQHDWLRQRIVXFKVHJPHQWVRQWKHPDSSURYLGHVVXIILFLHQWLQIRUPDWLRQIRUWKH GHYHORSPHQWRIUHVRXUFHSODQV,ILQWHQVLYHXVHRIVPDOODUHDVLVSODQQHGKRZHYHU RQVLWHLQYHVWLJDWLRQLVQHHGHGWRGHILQHDQGORFDWHWKHVRLOVDQGPLVFHOODQHRXV DUHDV
$QLGHQWLI\LQJV\PEROSUHFHGHVWKHPDSXQLWQDPHLQWKHPDSXQLWGHVFULSWLRQV (DFKGHVFULSWLRQLQFOXGHVJHQHUDOIDFWVDERXWWKHXQLWDQGJLYHVLPSRUWDQWVRLO SURSHUWLHVDQGTXDOLWLHV
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


1.b
Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 6DQ0DWHR&RXQW\(DVWHUQ3DUWDQG6DQ)UDQFLVFR&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD 
²&DQGOHVWLFN%DUQDEHFRPSOH[WRSHUFHQWVORSHV
0DS8QLW6HWWLQJ
1DWLRQDOPDSXQLWV\PERO
 K
JT
(OHYDWLRQ
 WRIHHW
0HDQDQQXDOSUHFLSLWDWLRQ
 WRLQFKHV
0HDQDQQXDODLUWHPSHUDWXUH
 WRGHJUHHV)
)URVWIUHHSHULRG
 WRGD\V
)DUPODQGFODVVLILFDWLRQ
 1RWSULPHIDUPODQG
0DS8QLW&RPSRVLWLRQ
&DQGOHVWLFNDQGVLPLODUVRLOV
 SHUFHQW
%DUQDEHDQGVLPLODUVRLOV
 SHUFHQW
0LQRUFRPSRQHQWV
 SHUFHQW
(VWLPDWHVDUHEDVHGRQREVHUYDWLRQVGHVFULSWLRQVDQGWUDQVHFWVRIWKHPDSXQLW 'HVFULSWLRQRI&DQGOHVWLFN
6HWWLQJ
/DQGIRUP
 0RXQWDLQVORSHV
/DQGIRUPSRVLWLRQ
WZRGLPHQVLRQDO

 %DFNVORSH
/DQGIRUPSRVLWLRQ
WKUHHGLPHQVLRQDO

 0RXQWDLQIODQN
'RZQVORSHVKDSH
 &RQFDYH
$FURVVVORSHVKDSH
 &RQYH[
3DUHQWPDWHULDO
 +DUGIUDFWXUHGUHVLGXXPZHDWKHUHGIURPVDQGVWRQH
7\SLFDOSURILOH
+WRLQFKHV
 ILQHVDQG\ORDP
+WRLQFKHV
 ORDP
+WRLQFKHV
 VDQG\FOD\ORDP
+WRLQFKHV
 XQZHDWKHUHGEHGURFN
3URSHUWLHVDQGTXDOLWLHV
6ORSH
 WRSHUFHQW
'HSWKWRUHVWULFWLYHIHDWXUH
 WRLQFKHVWROLWKLFEHGURFN
1DWXUDOGUDLQDJHFODVV
 :HOOGUDLQHG
5XQRIIFODVV
 9HU\KLJK
&DSDFLW\RIWKHPRVWOLPLWLQJOD\HUWRWUDQVPLWZDWHU
.VDW

 0RGHUDWHO\KLJK

WRLQKU

'HSWKWRZDWHUWDEOH
 0RUHWKDQLQFKHV
)UHTXHQF\RIIORRGLQJ
 1RQH
)UHTXHQF\RISRQGLQJ
 1RQH
6DOLQLW\PD[LPXPLQSURILOH
 1RQVDOLQHWRYHU\VOLJKWO\VDOLQH
WR
PPKRVFP

$YDLODEOHZDWHUVWRUDJHLQSURILOH
 /RZ
DERXWLQFKHV

,QWHUSUHWLYHJURXSV
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

LUULJDWHG

 1RQHVSHFLILHG
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

QRQLUULJDWHG

 H
+\GURORJLF6RLO*URXS
 &
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
&XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 'HVFULSWLRQRI%DUQDEH
6HWWLQJ
/DQGIRUP
 0RXQWDLQVORSHV
/DQGIRUPSRVLWLRQ
WZRGLPHQVLRQDO

 %DFNVORSH
/DQGIRUPSRVLWLRQ
WKUHHGLPHQVLRQDO

 0RXQWDLQIODQN
'RZQVORSHVKDSH
 &RQFDYH
$FURVVVORSHVKDSH
 &RQYH[
3DUHQWPDWHULDO
 5HVLGXXPZHDWKHUHGIURPVDQGVWRQH
7\SLFDOSURILOH
+WRLQFKHV
 YHU\JUDYHOO\VDQG\ORDP
+WRLQFKHV
 YHU\JUDYHOO\VDQG\ORDP
+WRLQFKHV
 XQZHDWKHUHGEHGURFN
3URSHUWLHVDQGTXDOLWLHV
6ORSH
 WRSHUFHQW
'HSWKWRUHVWULFWLYHIHDWXUH
 WRLQFKHVWROLWKLFEHGURFN
1DWXUDOGUDLQDJHFODVV
 :HOOGUDLQHG
5XQRIIFODVV
 0HGLXP
&DSDFLW\RIWKHPRVWOLPLWLQJOD\HUWRWUDQVPLWZDWHU
.VDW

 0RGHUDWHO\KLJKWR
KLJK
WR
LQKU

'HSWKWRZDWHUWDEOH
 0RUHWKDQLQFKHV
)UHTXHQF\RIIORRGLQJ
 1RQH
)UHTXHQF\RISRQGLQJ
 1RQH
6DOLQLW\PD[LPXPLQSURILOH
 1RQVDOLQHWRYHU\VOLJKWO\VDOLQH
WR
PPKRVFP

$YDLODEOHZDWHUVWRUDJHLQSURILOH
 9HU\ORZ
DERXW
LQFKHV

,QWHUSUHWLYHJURXSV
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

LUULJDWHG

 1RQHVSHFLILHG
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

QRQLUULJDWHG

 H
+\GURORJLF6RLO*URXS
 '
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
0LQRU&RPSRQHQWV
2UWKHQWVFXW ILOO
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
8QQDPHG
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
.URQ
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
%XULEXUL
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
5RFNRXWFURS
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
&XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) ²8UEDQODQG
0DS8QLW6HWWLQJ
1DWLRQDOPDSXQLWV\PERO
 K
KI
(OHYDWLRQ
 WRIHHW
0HDQDQQXDOSUHFLSLWDWLRQ
 WRLQFKHV
0HDQDQQXDODLUWHPSHUDWXUH
 WRGHJUHHV)
)URVWIUHHSHULRG
 WRGD\V
)DUPODQGFODVVLILFDWLRQ
 1RWSULPHIDUPODQG
0DS8QLW&RPSRVLWLRQ
8UEDQODQG
 SHUFHQW
0LQRUFRPSRQHQWV
 SHUFHQW
(VWLPDWHVDUHEDVHGRQREVHUYDWLRQVGHVFULSWLRQVDQGWUDQVHFWVRIWKHPDSXQLW 'HVFULSWLRQRI8UEDQ/DQG
6HWWLQJ
/DQGIRUPSRVLWLRQ
WZRGLPHQVLRQDO

 7RHVORSH
,QWHUSUHWLYHJURXSV
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

LUULJDWHG

 1RQHVSHFLILHG
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

QRQLUULJDWHG

 V
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
0LQRU&RPSRQHQWV
2UWKHQWVUHFODLPHG
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
2UWKHQWVFXW ILOO
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
²8UEDQODQG2UWKHQWVFXWDQGILOOFRPSOH[WRSHUFHQWVORSHV 0DS8QLW6HWWLQJ
1DWLRQDOPDSXQLWV\PERO
 K
KJ
(OHYDWLRQ
 WRIHHW
0HDQDQQXDOSUHFLSLWDWLRQ
 WRLQFKHV
0HDQDQQXDODLUWHPSHUDWXUH
 WRGHJUHHV)
)URVWIUHHSHULRG
 WRGD\V
&XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) )DUPODQGFODVVLILFDWLRQ
 1RWSULPHIDUPODQG
0DS8QLW&RPSRVLWLRQ
8UEDQODQG
 SHUFHQW
2UWKHQWVDQGVLPLODUVRLOV
 SHUFHQW
0LQRUFRPSRQHQWV
 SHUFHQW
(VWLPDWHVDUHEDVHGRQREVHUYDWLRQVGHVFULSWLRQVDQGWUDQVHFWVRIWKHPDSXQLW 'HVFULSWLRQRI8UEDQ/DQG
6HWWLQJ
/DQGIRUP
 $OOXYLDOIDQVPDULQHWHUUDFHV
/DQGIRUPSRVLWLRQ
WZRGLPHQVLRQDO

 )RRWVORSH
/DQGIRUPSRVLWLRQ
WKUHHGLPHQVLRQDO

 7UHDG
3DUHQWPDWHULDO
 $OOXYLXP
,QWHUSUHWLYHJURXSV
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

LUULJDWHG

 1RQHVSHFLILHG
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

QRQLUULJDWHG

 V
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
'HVFULSWLRQRI2UWKHQWV
3URSHUWLHVDQGTXDOLWLHV
6ORSH
 WRSHUFHQW
'HSWKWRUHVWULFWLYHIHDWXUH
 0RUHWKDQLQFKHV
1DWXUDOGUDLQDJHFODVV
 :HOOGUDLQHG
'HSWKWRZDWHUWDEOH
 0RUHWKDQLQFKHV
)UHTXHQF\RIIORRGLQJ
 1RQH
)UHTXHQF\RISRQGLQJ
 1RQH
,QWHUSUHWLYHJURXSV
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

LUULJDWHG

 1RQHVSHFLILHG
/DQGFDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ

QRQLUULJDWHG

 H
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
0LQRU&RPSRQHQWV
%RWHOOD
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
2UWKHQWVUHFODLPHG
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
6LUGUDN
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
8QQDPHG
3HUFHQWRIPDSXQLW
 SHUFHQW
+\GULFVRLOUDWLQJ
 1R
&XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) &XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 5HIHUHQFHV
$PHULFDQ$VVRFLDWLRQRI6WDWH+LJKZD\DQG7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ2IILFLDOV $$6+72

6WDQGDUGVSHFLILFDWLRQVIRUWUDQVSRUWDWLRQPDWHULDOVDQGPHWKRGVRIVDPSOLQJ DQGWHVWLQJWKHGLWLRQ
$PHULFDQ6RFLHW\IRU7HVWLQJDQG0DWHULDOV
$670
6WDQGDUGFODVVLILFDWLRQRI
VRLOVIRUHQJLQHHULQJSXUSRVHV$6706WDQGDUG' &RZDUGLQ/09&DUWHU)&*ROHWDQG(7/D5RH 
&ODVVLILFDWLRQRI
ZHWODQGVDQGGHHSZDWHUKDELWDWVRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV86)LVKDQG:LOGOLIH 6HUYLFH):62%6

)HGHUDO5HJLVWHU-XO\

&KDQJHVLQK\GULFVRLOVRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV
)HGHUDO5HJLVWHU6HSWHPEHU+\GULFVRLOVRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV +XUW*:DQG/09DVLODVHGLWRUV9HUVLRQ)LHOGLQGLFDWRUVRIK\GULF VRLOVLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV
1DWLRQDO5HVHDUFK&RXQFLO

:HWODQGV
&KDUDFWHULVWLFVDQGERXQGDULHV
6RLO6XUYH\'LYLVLRQ6WDII

6RLOVXUYH\PDQXDO6RLO&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH
86'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH+DQGERRNKWWS
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRYZSVSRUWDO
QUFVGHWDLOQDWLRQDOVRLOV"FLG QUFVSB
6RLO6XUYH\6WDII

6RLOWD[RQRP\
$EDVLFV\VWHPRIVRLOFODVVLILFDWLRQIRU
PDNLQJDQGLQWHUSUHWLQJVRLOVXUYH\VQGHGLWLRQ1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ 6HUYLFH86'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH+DQGERRNKWWS 
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRYZSVSRUWDOQUFVGHWDLOQDWLRQDOVRLOV"FLG QUFVSB 6RLO6XUYH\6WDII.H\VWRVRLOWD[RQRP\WKHGLWLRQ86'HSDUWPHQWRI $JULFXOWXUH1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFHKWWS 
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRYZSVSRUWDOQUFVGHWDLOQDWLRQDOVRLOV"FLG QUFVSB 7LQHU5:-U
:HWODQGVRI'HODZDUH86)LVKDQG:LOGOLIH6HUYLFHDQG 'HODZDUH'HSDUWPHQWRI1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHVDQG(QYLURQPHQWDO&RQWURO:HWODQGV 6HFWLRQ
8QLWHG6WDWHV$UP\&RUSVRI(QJLQHHUV(QYLURQPHQWDO/DERUDWRU\ &RUSVRI
(QJLQHHUVZHWODQGVGHOLQHDWLRQPDQXDO:DWHUZD\V([SHULPHQW6WDWLRQ7HFKQLFDO 5HSRUW<
8QLWHG6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH 1DWLRQDOIRUHVWU\PDQXDOKWWS
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRYZSVSRUWDOQUFVGHWDLOVRLOV
KRPH"FLG QUFVSB
8QLWHG6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH 1DWLRQDOUDQJHDQGSDVWXUHKDQGERRNKWWS
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRYZSVSRUWDOQUFV
GHWDLOQDWLRQDOODQGXVHUDQJHSDVWXUH"FLG VWHOSUGE 

1.b
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 8QLWHG6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH 1DWLRQDOVRLOVXUYH\KDQGERRNWLWOH9,KWWS
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRYZSVSRUWDO
QUFVGHWDLOVRLOVVFLHQWLVWV"FLG QUFVSB
8QLWHG6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH /DQGUHVRXUFHUHJLRQVDQGPDMRUODQGUHVRXUFHDUHDVRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV WKH&DULEEHDQDQGWKH3DFLILF%DVLQ86'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH+DQGERRN 
KWWS
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRYZSVSRUWDOQUFVGHWDLOQDWLRQDOVRLOV" FLG QUFVSB
8QLWHG6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH6RLO&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH /DQG
FDSDELOLW\FODVVLILFDWLRQ86'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH+DQGERRNKWWS 
ZZZQUFVXVGDJRY,QWHUQHW)6(B'2&80(176QUFVSB SGI
&XVWRP6RLO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW


1.b
Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
WETS Tables
Note: the nearest station with sufficient precipitation data (20 years) for generating WETS tables is the Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant in southwest San Francisco, approximately 8.9 miles north of the Crespi Drive site. The coastal setting and overall climate are similar. ... WETS Station: SAN FRANCISCO OCEANSIDE, CA
Requested years: 2000 - 2020
Temperature {°F) Precipitation (inches)
Month Avg Avg Avg 30o/a chance Avg number Average will have of days with daily daily daily Avg 0.10 inch total max min mean less than more than snowfall
or more
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May 59.1 50.3 54.7
Jun
Jul 0.01 0.00 0.00 0
Aug 62.5 54.8 58.7
Sep
Oct
Nov 63.4 49.3 56.3
Dec
Annual:

Average
Total

IGROWING SEASON DATES
Requested years of data: 2000-2020 ,,.
◄ ►

1.b
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Updated Delineation and Effects Analysis
540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
National Wetland Inventory Map

0 0.05
0 0.015 0.15
August 20, 2020
Wetlands D Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater ■ Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland D Estuarine and Marine Wetland D Freshwater Pond
National wetlands Inventory
■ Lake
0 Other
Riverine
Thi$ map iS for general rel&rence ontv. The US FiSh and Wildlife Sorwice Is not rosponsiblo for the accuracy or currontnoss of tho base data shown on this map. Al wetlands related dala should b& used in accordance with the layer moladata found on the WeUonds Mapper web sile.

NWOt"I.IIWol~ lnvon:ory{NV\4)
This- page WU produced by the NW mapper

1.b
Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

WOOD BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
Delineation of Potentially Jurisdictional Wetlands and Other Waters

540 and 570 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, CA
California Aquatic Resource Inventory Map
100 .n
Pacifica
State Beach
California Aquatic Resource Inventory Map Baisemap daih provided by :C OpenStreetMaip

1.b
Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

APPENDIX
E

1.b
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
1 / 92
570 Crespi Drive Custom Report
Table of Contents1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information1.2. Land Use Types1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated3.2. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated

1.b
Packet Pg. 861
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
2 / 92

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated3.4. Grading (2025) - Mitigated3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated3.6. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated3.8. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated3.9. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated3.10. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated3.11. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated3.12. Paving (2025) - Mitigated3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated3.14. Architectural Coating (2025) - Mitigated3.15. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated3.16. Architectural Coating (2026) - Mitigated3.17. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated3.18. Architectural Coating (2027) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

1.b
Packet Pg. 862
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
3 / 92

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated4.5.2. Mitigated

1.b
Packet Pg. 863
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
4 / 92

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

1.b
Packet Pg. 864
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
5 / 92

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

1.b
Packet Pg. 865
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
6 / 92

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings5.10.3. Landscape Equipment5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated5.12.2. Mitigated

1.b
Packet Pg. 866
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
7 / 92

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated5.18.1.2. Mitigated

1.b
Packet Pg. 867
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
8 / 92

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated5.18.2.2. Mitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data

1.b
Packet Pg. 868
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
9 / 92

1. Basic Project Information1.1. Basic Project Information Data Field ValueProject Name 570 Crespi DriveConstruction Start Date 6/2/2025Operational Year 2027Lead Agency City of PacificaLand Use Scale Project/siteAnalysis Level for Defaults CountyWindspeed (m/s) 4.60Precipitation (days) 43.0Location 37.59819136044743, -122.49929944787738County San MateoCity PacificaAir District Bay Area AQMDAir Basin San Francisco Bay AreaTAZ 1224EDFZ 1Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric CompanyGas Utility Pacific Gas & ElectricApp Version 2022.1.1.25

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special LandscapeArea (sq ft)
Population Description

1.b
Packet Pg. 869
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
10 / 92
Condo/Townhouse 16.0 Dwelling Unit 0.78 36,839 5,602 — 46.0 — Medical OfficeBuilding

3.17 1000sqft 0.07 3,165 7,953 — — —
Parking Lot 15.0 Space 0.13 0.00 0.00 — — —Apartments LowRise

3.00 Dwelling Unit 0.00 3,692 0.00 — 9.00 —
Other AsphaltSurfaces

5.56 1000sqft 0.13 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure TitleEnergy E-10-B Establish Onsite Renewable Energy Systems: Solar Power

2. Emissions Summary2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against ThresholdsCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Unmit. 3.18 2.93 15.0 15.4 0.03 0.65 7.31 7.96 0.60 3.48 4.08 — 3,127 3,127 0.19 0.12 1.44 3,167Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Unmit. 3.18 2.92 9.98 11.7 0.02 0.36 0.16 0.52 0.33 0.04 0.37 — 2,145 2,145 0.09 0.03 0.02 2,157AverageDaily(Max) ——————————————————
Unmit. 2.22 2.04 6.83 8.29 0.02 0.23 0.88 1.05 0.21 0.41 0.57 — 1,530 1,530 0.06 0.02 0.18 1,538 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 870
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
11 / 92
Annual(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit. 0.40 0.37 1.25 1.51 < 0.005 0.04 0.16 0.19 0.04 0.07 0.10 — 253 253 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 255

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily -Summer(Max) ——————————————————
2025 3.18 2.93 15.0 15.4 0.03 0.65 7.31 7.96 0.60 3.48 4.08 — 3,127 3,127 0.19 0.12 1.44 3,1672026 3.11 2.86 9.56 11.7 0.02 0.32 0.16 0.48 0.29 0.04 0.33 — 2,149 2,149 0.09 0.03 0.59 2,160Daily -Winter(Max) ——————————————————
2025 3.18 2.92 9.98 11.7 0.02 0.36 0.16 0.52 0.33 0.04 0.37 — 2,145 2,145 0.09 0.03 0.02 2,1572026 3.11 2.86 9.57 11.6 0.02 0.32 0.16 0.48 0.29 0.04 0.33 — 2,141 2,141 0.09 0.03 0.02 2,1532027 3.04 2.81 9.22 11.5 0.02 0.28 0.16 0.45 0.26 0.04 0.30 — 2,137 2,137 0.09 0.03 0.01 2,147AverageDaily ——————————————————
2025 0.99 0.88 4.40 4.99 0.01 0.17 0.88 1.05 0.16 0.41 0.57 — 938 938 0.05 0.02 0.15 9462026 2.22 2.04 6.83 8.29 0.02 0.23 0.11 0.34 0.21 0.03 0.24 — 1,530 1,530 0.06 0.02 0.18 1,5382027 0.13 0.12 0.26 0.33 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 58.6 58.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 58.9Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —2025 0.18 0.16 0.80 0.91 < 0.005 0.03 0.16 0.19 0.03 0.07 0.10 — 155 155 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 1572026 0.40 0.37 1.25 1.51 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 — 253 253 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 2552027 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.71 9.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.75

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 871
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
12 / 92
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily -Summer(Max) ——————————————————
2025 3.18 2.93 15.0 15.4 0.03 0.65 7.31 7.96 0.60 3.48 4.08 — 3,127 3,127 0.19 0.12 1.44 3,1672026 3.11 2.86 9.56 11.7 0.02 0.32 0.16 0.48 0.29 0.04 0.33 — 2,149 2,149 0.09 0.03 0.59 2,160Daily -Winter(Max) ——————————————————
2025 3.18 2.92 9.98 11.7 0.02 0.36 0.16 0.52 0.33 0.04 0.37 — 2,145 2,145 0.09 0.03 0.02 2,1572026 3.11 2.86 9.57 11.6 0.02 0.32 0.16 0.48 0.29 0.04 0.33 — 2,141 2,141 0.09 0.03 0.02 2,1532027 3.04 2.81 9.22 11.5 0.02 0.28 0.16 0.45 0.26 0.04 0.30 — 2,137 2,137 0.09 0.03 0.01 2,147AverageDaily ——————————————————
2025 0.99 0.88 4.40 4.99 0.01 0.17 0.88 1.05 0.16 0.41 0.57 — 938 938 0.05 0.02 0.15 9462026 2.22 2.04 6.83 8.29 0.02 0.23 0.11 0.34 0.21 0.03 0.24 — 1,530 1,530 0.06 0.02 0.18 1,5382027 0.13 0.12 0.26 0.33 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 58.6 58.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 58.9Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —2025 0.18 0.16 0.80 0.91 < 0.005 0.03 0.16 0.19 0.03 0.07 0.10 — 155 155 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 1572026 0.40 0.37 1.25 1.51 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 — 253 253 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 2552027 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.71 9.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.75

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against ThresholdsCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Unmit. 2.04 1.95 0.71 8.45 0.02 0.02 2.09 2.12 0.02 0.53 0.55 28.1 2,476 2,504 2.92 0.07 6.28 2,606 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 872
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
13 / 92
Mit. 2.04 1.95 0.71 8.45 0.02 0.02 2.09 2.12 0.02 0.53 0.55 28.1 2,438 2,466 2.91 0.07 6.28 2,567 %Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2% 2% < 0.5% — — 1%
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit. 1.90 1.82 0.80 6.94 0.02 0.02 2.09 2.12 0.02 0.53 0.55 28.1 2,376 2,404 2.92 0.08 0.52 2,502Mit. 1.90 1.82 0.80 6.94 0.02 0.02 2.09 2.12 0.02 0.53 0.55 28.1 2,338 2,366 2.92 0.08 0.52 2,463%Reduced — — — — — — — — — — — — 2% 2% < 0.5% — — 2%
AverageDaily(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit. 1.83 1.75 0.67 6.25 0.02 0.02 1.70 1.73 0.02 0.43 0.45 28.1 2,043 2,071 2.91 0.07 2.51 2,166Mit. 1.83 1.75 0.67 6.25 0.02 0.02 1.70 1.73 0.02 0.43 0.45 28.1 2,004 2,032 2.90 0.07 2.51 2,127%Reduced — — — — — — — — — — — — 2% 2% < 0.5% — — 2%
Annual(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit. 0.33 0.32 0.12 1.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 4.65 338 343 0.48 0.01 0.42 359Mit. 0.33 0.32 0.12 1.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 4.65 332 336 0.48 0.01 0.42 352%Reduced — — — — — — — — — — — — 2% 2% < 0.5% 1% — 2%

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Mobile 0.79 0.72 0.55 7.16 0.02 0.01 2.09 2.10 0.01 0.53 0.54 — 2,191 2,191 0.07 0.07 5.91 2,219 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 873
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
14 / 92
Area 1.23 1.22 0.01 1.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.45 3.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.46 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 278 278 0.03 < 0.005 — 279Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37Total 2.04 1.95 0.71 8.45 0.02 0.02 2.09 2.12 0.02 0.53 0.55 28.1 2,476 2,504 2.92 0.07 6.28 2,606Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Mobile 0.78 0.71 0.65 6.87 0.02 0.01 2.09 2.10 0.01 0.53 0.54 — 2,094 2,094 0.08 0.07 0.15 2,118Area 1.10 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 278 278 0.03 < 0.005 — 279Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37Total 1.90 1.82 0.80 6.94 0.02 0.02 2.09 2.12 0.02 0.53 0.55 28.1 2,376 2,404 2.92 0.08 0.52 2,502AverageDaily ——————————————————
Mobile 0.65 0.59 0.51 5.57 0.02 0.01 1.70 1.71 0.01 0.43 0.44 — 1,759 1,759 0.06 0.06 2.14 1,780Area 1.16 1.16 0.01 0.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.71Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 278 278 0.03 < 0.005 — 279Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37Total 1.83 1.75 0.67 6.25 0.02 0.02 1.70 1.73 0.02 0.43 0.45 28.1 2,043 2,071 2.91 0.07 2.51 2,166Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Mobile 0.12 0.11 0.09 1.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 291 291 0.01 0.01 0.35 295Area 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.28Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 46.0 46.0 0.01 < 0.005 — 46.2

1.b
Packet Pg. 874
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
15 / 92
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.34 0.71 1.05 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.19 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 4.31 0.00 4.31 0.43 0.00 — 15.1Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.06Total 0.33 0.32 0.12 1.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 4.65 338 343 0.48 0.01 0.42 359

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Mobile 0.79 0.72 0.55 7.16 0.02 0.01 2.09 2.10 0.01 0.53 0.54 — 2,191 2,191 0.07 0.07 5.91 2,219Area 1.23 1.22 0.01 1.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.45 3.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.46Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 240 240 0.02 < 0.005 — 241Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37Total 2.04 1.95 0.71 8.45 0.02 0.02 2.09 2.12 0.02 0.53 0.55 28.1 2,438 2,466 2.91 0.07 6.28 2,567Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Mobile 0.78 0.71 0.65 6.87 0.02 0.01 2.09 2.10 0.01 0.53 0.54 — 2,094 2,094 0.08 0.07 0.15 2,118Area 1.10 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 240 240 0.02 < 0.005 — 241Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37Total 1.90 1.82 0.80 6.94 0.02 0.02 2.09 2.12 0.02 0.53 0.55 28.1 2,338 2,366 2.92 0.08 0.52 2,463 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 875
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
16 / 92
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily
Mobile 0.65 0.59 0.51 5.57 0.02 0.01 1.70 1.71 0.01 0.43 0.44 — 1,759 1,759 0.06 0.06 2.14 1,780Area 1.16 1.16 0.01 0.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.71Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 240 240 0.02 < 0.005 — 241Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37Total 1.83 1.75 0.67 6.25 0.02 0.02 1.70 1.73 0.02 0.43 0.45 28.1 2,004 2,032 2.90 0.07 2.51 2,127Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Mobile 0.12 0.11 0.09 1.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 291 291 0.01 0.01 0.35 295Area 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.28Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 39.7 39.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.8Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.34 0.71 1.05 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.19Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 4.31 0.00 4.31 0.43 0.00 — 15.1Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.06Total 0.33 0.32 0.12 1.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 4.65 332 336 0.48 0.01 0.42 352

3. Construction Emissions Details3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.56 1.31 12.1 12.1 0.02 0.56 — 0.56 0.52 — 0.52 — 2,065 2,065 0.08 0.02 — 2,072 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 876
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
17 / 92
DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 6.26 6.26 — 3.00 3.00 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.3 11.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.4 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.87 1.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.88 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 61.8 61.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 62.1Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 877
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
18 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.33Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2. Site Preparation (2025) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.56 1.31 12.1 12.1 0.02 0.56 — 0.56 0.52 — 0.52 — 2,065 2,065 0.08 0.02 — 2,072 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 6.26 6.26 — 3.00 3.00 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 878
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
19 / 92
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily
Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.3 11.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.4 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.87 1.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.88 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 61.8 61.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 62.1Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.33Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 879
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
20 / 92
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Grading (2025) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.80 1.51 14.1 14.5 0.02 0.64 — 0.64 0.59 — 0.59 — 2,455 2,455 0.10 0.02 — 2,463 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 7.09 7.09 — 3.43 3.43 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.20 0.17 1.54 1.59 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 269 269 0.01 < 0.005 — 270 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 0.78 0.78 — 0.38 0.38 — — — — — — —
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 880
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
21 / 92
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.04 0.03 0.28 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 44.5 44.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 44.7 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 0.14 0.14 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 82.4 82.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.27 82.9Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.11 0.01 0.91 0.62 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 590 590 0.09 0.09 1.17 621Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.55 8.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.68Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 64.6 64.6 0.01 0.01 0.06 68.0Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.42 1.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.44Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.7 10.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 11.3

1.b
Packet Pg. 881
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
22 / 92

3.4. Grading (2025) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.80 1.51 14.1 14.5 0.02 0.64 — 0.64 0.59 — 0.59 — 2,455 2,455 0.10 0.02 — 2,463 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 7.09 7.09 — 3.43 3.43 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.20 0.17 1.54 1.59 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 269 269 0.01 < 0.005 — 270 DustFromMaterialMovement
— — — — — — 0.78 0.78 — 0.38 0.38 — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.04 0.03 0.28 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 44.5 44.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 44.7 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 882
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
23 / 92
Dust — — — — — — 0.14 0.14 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —FromMaterialMovement Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 82.4 82.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.27 82.9Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.11 0.01 0.91 0.62 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 590 590 0.09 0.09 1.17 621Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.55 8.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.68Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 64.6 64.6 0.01 0.01 0.06 68.0Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.42 1.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.44Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.7 10.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 11.3

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 883
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
24 / 92
Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.28 1.07 8.95 10.0 0.02 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.28 1.07 8.95 10.0 0.02 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.32 0.26 2.21 2.47 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 444 444 0.02 < 0.005 — 446 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.06 0.05 0.40 0.45 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 73.5 73.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 73.8 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 121 121 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 122Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 73.4 73.4 0.01 0.01 0.18 76.8Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 884
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
25 / 92
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Winter(Max)
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 114 114 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 116Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 73.4 73.4 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 76.7Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 28.3 28.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 28.7Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.1 18.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 18.9Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.68 4.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.75Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.00 3.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.13Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Building Construction (2025) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.28 1.07 8.95 10.0 0.02 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 885
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
26 / 92
Off-RoadEquipment

1.28 1.07 8.95 10.0 0.02 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.32 0.26 2.21 2.47 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 444 444 0.02 < 0.005 — 446 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.06 0.05 0.40 0.45 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 73.5 73.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 73.8 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 121 121 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 122Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 73.4 73.4 0.01 0.01 0.18 76.8Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 114 114 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 116Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 73.4 73.4 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 76.7Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 28.3 28.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 28.7Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.1 18.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 18.9

1.b
Packet Pg. 886
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
27 / 92
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.68 4.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.75Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.00 3.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.13Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.22 1.01 8.57 9.96 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.22 1.01 8.57 9.96 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.87 0.72 6.12 7.11 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 1,286 1,286 0.05 0.01 — 1,291 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 887
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
28 / 92
Off-RoadEquipment

0.16 0.13 1.12 1.30 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 213 213 0.01 < 0.005 — 214 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 119 119 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.35 119Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 72.0 72.0 0.01 0.01 0.17 75.4Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 112 112 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 114Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 72.0 72.0 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 75.3Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 80.3 80.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 81.4Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 51.4 51.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 53.8Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.5Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.51 8.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.91Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Building Construction (2026) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 888
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
29 / 92
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.22 1.01 8.57 9.96 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.22 1.01 8.57 9.96 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.87 0.72 6.12 7.11 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 1,286 1,286 0.05 0.01 — 1,291 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.16 0.13 1.12 1.30 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 213 213 0.01 < 0.005 — 214 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 119 119 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.35 119Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 72.0 72.0 0.01 0.01 0.17 75.4Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 889
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
30 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 112 112 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 114Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 72.0 72.0 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 75.3Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 80.3 80.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 81.4Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 51.4 51.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 53.8Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.5Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.51 8.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.91Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2027) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.17 0.97 8.25 9.91 0.02 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 890
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
31 / 92
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.03 0.02 0.21 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 45.8 45.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 46.0 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.59 7.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.61 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 110 110 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 110Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 70.4 70.4 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 73.5Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.81 2.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.82Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.79 1.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.87Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.46 0.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.47Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 891
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
32 / 92

3.10. Building Construction (2027) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

1.17 0.97 8.25 9.91 0.02 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 1,801 1,801 0.07 0.01 — 1,807 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.03 0.02 0.21 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 45.8 45.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 46.0 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.59 7.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.61 Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 892
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
33 / 92
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 110 110 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 110 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 70.4 70.4 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 73.5Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.81 2.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.82Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.79 1.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.87Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.46 0.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.47Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Paving (2025) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.59 0.49 4.63 6.50 0.01 0.20 — 0.20 0.19 — 0.19 — 992 992 0.04 0.01 — 995 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 893
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
34 / 92
Off-RoadEquipment

0.03 0.03 0.25 0.36 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 54.3 54.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 54.5 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.00 9.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.03 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 103 103 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.34 104Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.35 5.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.42Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.90Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 894
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
35 / 92

3.12. Paving (2025) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.59 0.49 4.63 6.50 0.01 0.20 — 0.20 0.19 — 0.19 — 992 992 0.04 0.01 — 995 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.03 0.03 0.25 0.36 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 54.3 54.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 54.5 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.00 9.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.03 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 895
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
36 / 92
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 103 103 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.34 104 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
AverageDaily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.35 5.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.42Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.90Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 896
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
37 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.03 0.03 0.19 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 29.3 29.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 29.4 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.37 0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.01 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.85 4.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.86 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.07 0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 24.2 24.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 24.3Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 897
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
38 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.9 22.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 23.2Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.03 5.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.10Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.83 0.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.84Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.14. Architectural Coating (2025) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 898
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
39 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.03 0.03 0.19 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 29.3 29.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 29.4 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.37 0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.01 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.85 4.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.86 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.07 0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 24.2 24.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 24.3Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 899
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
40 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.9 22.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 23.2Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.03 5.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.10Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.83 0.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.84Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Architectural Coating (2026) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.15 0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 900
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
41 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.15 0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.10 0.09 0.61 0.81 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 95.4 95.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 95.7 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.20 1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.02 0.02 0.11 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.22 0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.7 23.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 23.8Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 901
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
42 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.7Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 16.3Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.66 2.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.70Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.16. Architectural Coating (2026) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.15 0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 902
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
43 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.15 0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.10 0.09 0.61 0.81 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 95.4 95.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 95.7 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.20 1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment

0.02 0.02 0.11 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.22 0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.7 23.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 23.8Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 903
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
44 / 92
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.7Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 16.3Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.66 2.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.70Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.17. Architectural Coating (2027) - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 904
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
45 / 92
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.01 0.04 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.05 7.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.08 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.09 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Off-RoadEquipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.17 1.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.17 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.02 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.0 22.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.1Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.17 1.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.17Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 905
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
46 / 92
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.19 0.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.18. Architectural Coating (2027) - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eOnsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 ArchitecturalCoatings

1.69 1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AverageDaily
——————————————————
Off-RoadEquipment

0.01 0.01 0.04 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.05 7.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.08 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.09 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 906
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
47 / 92
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-RoadEquipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.17 1.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.17 ArchitecturalCoatings

0.02 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsitetruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Daily,Winter(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.0 22.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.1Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AverageDaily ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.17 1.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.17Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.19 0.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

1.b
Packet Pg. 907
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
48 / 92

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use4.1.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse

0.39 0.36 0.27 3.55 0.01 0.01 1.04 1.04 0.01 0.26 0.27 — 1,087 1,087 0.03 0.03 2.93 1,101 MedicalOfficeBuilding

0.33 0.30 0.23 2.95 0.01 < 0.005 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 0.22 0.22 — 900 900 0.03 0.03 2.43 911 ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise

0.07 0.07 0.05 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 0.20 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 204 204 0.01 0.01 0.55 206 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.79 0.72 0.55 7.16 0.02 0.01 2.09 2.10 0.01 0.53 0.54 — 2,191 2,191 0.07 0.07 5.91 2,219Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse

0.39 0.35 0.32 3.40 0.01 0.01 1.04 1.04 0.01 0.26 0.27 — 1,039 1,039 0.04 0.04 0.08 1,051 MedicalOfficeBuilding

0.32 0.29 0.27 2.83 0.01 < 0.005 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 0.22 0.22 — 860 860 0.03 0.03 0.06 870

1.b
Packet Pg. 908
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
49 / 92
Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Lot ApartmentsLow Rise

0.07 0.07 0.06 0.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 0.20 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 195 195 0.01 0.01 0.01 197 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.78 0.71 0.65 6.87 0.02 0.01 2.09 2.10 0.01 0.53 0.54 — 2,094 2,094 0.08 0.07 0.15 2,118Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse

0.06 0.06 0.05 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 0.17 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 — 154 154 0.01 0.01 0.19 156 MedicalOfficeBuilding

0.04 0.04 0.03 0.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.12 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 — 108 108 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 109 ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 29.0 29.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 29.3 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.12 0.11 0.09 1.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 291 291 0.01 0.01 0.35 295

4.1.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————

1.b
Packet Pg. 909
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
50 / 92
Condo/T 0.39 0.36 0.27 3.55 0.01 0.01 1.04 1.04 0.01 0.26 0.27 — 1,087 1,087 0.03 0.03 2.93 1,101ownhous MedicalOfficeBuilding

0.33 0.30 0.23 2.95 0.01 < 0.005 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 0.22 0.22 — 900 900 0.03 0.03 2.43 911 ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise

0.07 0.07 0.05 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 0.20 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 204 204 0.01 0.01 0.55 206 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.79 0.72 0.55 7.16 0.02 0.01 2.09 2.10 0.01 0.53 0.54 — 2,191 2,191 0.07 0.07 5.91 2,219Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse

0.39 0.35 0.32 3.40 0.01 0.01 1.04 1.04 0.01 0.26 0.27 — 1,039 1,039 0.04 0.04 0.08 1,051 MedicalOfficeBuilding

0.32 0.29 0.27 2.83 0.01 < 0.005 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 0.22 0.22 — 860 860 0.03 0.03 0.06 870 ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise

0.07 0.07 0.06 0.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 0.20 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 195 195 0.01 0.01 0.01 197 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.78 0.71 0.65 6.87 0.02 0.01 2.09 2.10 0.01 0.53 0.54 — 2,094 2,094 0.08 0.07 0.15 2,118Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

1.b
Packet Pg. 910
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
51 / 92
Condo/T 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 0.17 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 — 154 154 0.01 0.01 0.19 156ownhouse MedicalOfficeBuilding

0.04 0.04 0.03 0.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.12 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 — 108 108 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 109 ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 29.0 29.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 29.3 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.12 0.11 0.09 1.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 0.31 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 291 291 0.01 0.01 0.35 295

4.2. Energy4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — — 38.2 38.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 38.6
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — 37.4 37.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 37.8
ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.77 2.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.80

1.b
Packet Pg. 911
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
52 / 92
Apartme — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.29 6.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.35nts OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 84.7 84.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 85.6Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — — 38.2 38.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 38.6
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — 37.4 37.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 37.8
ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.77 2.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.80 ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 6.29 6.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.35 OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 84.7 84.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 85.6Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.33 6.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.39 MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — 6.20 6.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.26 ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.46 0.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.46

1.b
Packet Pg. 912
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
53 / 92
Apartme — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.04 1.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.05ntsLow Rise OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.2

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — 37.4 37.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 37.8
ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.77 2.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.80 ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 6.26 6.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.32 OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 46.5 46.5 0.01 < 0.005 — 46.9Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————

1.b
Packet Pg. 913
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
54 / 92
Condo/T — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00ownhous MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — 37.4 37.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 37.8
ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.77 2.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.80 ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 6.26 6.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.32 OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 46.5 46.5 0.01 < 0.005 — 46.9Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — 6.20 6.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.26 ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.46 0.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.46 ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1.04 1.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.05 OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 7.69 7.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.77

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

1.b
Packet Pg. 914
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
55 / 92
Land TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eUse Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 150 150 0.01 < 0.005 — 150 MedicalOfficeBuilding
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.2 ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.2 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 193 193 0.02 < 0.005 — 194Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 150 150 0.01 < 0.005 — 150 MedicalOfficeBuilding
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.2 ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.2

1.b
Packet Pg. 915
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
56 / 92
Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00AsphaltSurfaces Total 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 193 193 0.02 < 0.005 — 194Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.8 24.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.9 MedicalOfficeBuilding
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.99 3.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.00 ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.18 3.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.19 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 32.1

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 150 150 0.01 < 0.005 — 150 MedicalOfficeBuilding
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.2

1.b
Packet Pg. 916
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
57 / 92
ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.2 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 193 193 0.02 < 0.005 — 194Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 150 150 0.01 < 0.005 — 150 MedicalOfficeBuilding
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.2 ParkingLot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 ApartmentsLow Rise
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.2 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 193 193 0.02 < 0.005 — 194Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.8 24.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.9 MedicalOfficeBuilding
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.99 3.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 917
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
58 / 92
Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00Lot ApartmentsLow Rise
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.18 3.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.19 OtherAsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 32.1

4.3. Area Emissions by Source4.3.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00ConsumerProducts

0.94 0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings

0.17 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
LandscapeEquipment

0.12 0.12 0.01 1.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.45 3.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.46 Total 1.23 1.22 0.01 1.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.45 3.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.46Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 918
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
59 / 92
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 ConsumerProducts

0.94 0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings

0.17 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 1.10 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00ConsumerProducts

0.17 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings

0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
LandscapeEquipment

0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.28 Total 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.28

4.3.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00ConsumerProducts

0.94 0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 919
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
60 / 92
Architect 0.17 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —ural LandscapeEquipment

0.12 0.12 0.01 1.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.45 3.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.46 Total 1.23 1.22 0.01 1.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.45 3.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.46Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00ConsumerProducts

0.94 0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings

0.17 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 1.10 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00ConsumerProducts

0.17 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ArchitecturalCoatings

0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
LandscapeEquipment

0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.28 Total 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.28

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

1.b
Packet Pg. 920
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
61 / 92

4.4.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.11 2.26 3.37 0.11 < 0.005 — 7.05 MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.76 1.62 2.38 0.08 < 0.005 — 4.90 ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.21 0.39 0.60 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.29 OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.11 2.26 3.37 0.11 < 0.005 — 7.05 MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.76 1.62 2.38 0.08 < 0.005 — 4.90 ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 921
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
62 / 92
Apartme — — — — — — — — — — — 0.21 0.39 0.60 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.29nts OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse — — — — — — — — — — — 0.18 0.37 0.56 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.17 MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.27 0.39 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.81 ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.07 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.21 OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.34 0.71 1.05 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.19

4.4.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.11 2.26 3.37 0.11 < 0.005 — 7.05

1.b
Packet Pg. 922
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
63 / 92
Medical — — — — — — — — — — — 0.76 1.62 2.38 0.08 < 0.005 — 4.90OfficeBuilding ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.21 0.39 0.60 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.29 OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.11 2.26 3.37 0.11 < 0.005 — 7.05 MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.76 1.62 2.38 0.08 < 0.005 — 4.90 ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.21 0.39 0.60 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.29 OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 4.27 6.35 0.21 0.01 — 13.2Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse — — — — — — — — — — — 0.18 0.37 0.56 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.17

1.b
Packet Pg. 923
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
64 / 92
Medical — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.27 0.39 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.81OfficeBuilding ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.07 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.21 OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.34 0.71 1.05 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.19

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use4.5.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — 6.37 0.00 6.37 0.64 0.00 — 22.3
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.4 0.00 18.4 1.84 0.00 — 64.5
ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.25 0.00 1.25 0.12 0.00 — 4.36

1.b
Packet Pg. 924
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
65 / 92
Other — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00AsphaltSurfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — 6.37 0.00 6.37 0.64 0.00 — 22.3
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.4 0.00 18.4 1.84 0.00 — 64.5
ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.25 0.00 1.25 0.12 0.00 — 4.36
OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse — — — — — — — — — — — 1.05 0.00 1.05 0.11 0.00 — 3.69
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.05 0.00 3.05 0.30 0.00 — 10.7
ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.02 0.00 — 0.72

1.b
Packet Pg. 925
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
66 / 92
Other — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00AsphaltSurfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4.31 0.00 4.31 0.43 0.00 — 15.1

4.5.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — 6.37 0.00 6.37 0.64 0.00 — 22.3
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.4 0.00 18.4 1.84 0.00 — 64.5
ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.25 0.00 1.25 0.12 0.00 — 4.36
OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — 6.37 0.00 6.37 0.64 0.00 — 22.3

1.b
Packet Pg. 926
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
67 / 92
Medical — — — — — — — — — — — 18.4 0.00 18.4 1.84 0.00 — 64.5OfficeBuilding ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.25 0.00 1.25 0.12 0.00 — 4.36
OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 26.0 0.00 26.0 2.60 0.00 — 91.1Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse — — — — — — — — — — — 1.05 0.00 1.05 0.11 0.00 — 3.69
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.05 0.00 3.05 0.30 0.00 — 10.7
ParkingLot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.02 0.00 — 0.72
OtherAsphaltSurfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4.31 0.00 4.31 0.43 0.00 — 15.1

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use4.6.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

1.b
Packet Pg. 927
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
68 / 92
LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.26 0.26
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.08
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.03
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.26 0.26
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.08
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.03
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Condo/Townhouse — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 0.04
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01

1.b
Packet Pg. 928
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
69 / 92
ApartmeLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.06

4.6.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.26 0.26
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.08
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.03
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.26 0.26
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.08
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.03
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.37

1.b
Packet Pg. 929
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
70 / 92
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/Townhouse
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 0.04
MedicalOfficeBuilding
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
ApartmentsLow Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.06

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type4.7.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

1.b
Packet Pg. 930
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
71 / 92
EquipmeType
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type4.8.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

1.b
Packet Pg. 931
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
72 / 92

4.8.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type4.9.1. UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

1.b
Packet Pg. 932
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
73 / 92
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9.2. MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) EquipmentType
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

1.b
Packet Pg. 933
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
74 / 92
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Winter(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - UnmitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2eDaily,Summer(Max) ——————————————————
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 934
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
75 / 92
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ————————————————————Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered ——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ————————————————————Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered ——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ————————————————————

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

1.b
Packet Pg. 935
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
76 / 92
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) LandUse
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - MitigatedCriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

1.b
Packet Pg. 936
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
77 / 92
Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,Summer(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered ——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ————————————————————Daily,Winter(Max) ——————————————————
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered ——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Removed
——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ————————————————————Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Sequestered ——————————————————
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.b
Packet Pg. 937
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
78 / 92
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ————————————————————

5. Activity Data5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase DescriptionSite Preparation Site Preparation 6/2/2025 6/3/2025 5.00 2.00 —Grading Grading 6/5/2025 7/30/2025 5.00 40.0 —Building Construction Building Construction 8/28/2025 1/13/2027 5.00 360 —Paving Paving 7/31/2025 8/27/2025 5.00 20.0 —Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 9/11/2025 1/27/2027 5.00 360 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load FactorSite Preparation Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes
Diesel Average 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29

1.b
Packet Pg. 938
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
79 / 92
Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 81.0 0.42Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load FactorSite Preparation Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes
Diesel Average 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 82.0 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37

1.b
Packet Pg. 939
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
80 / 92
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 81.0 0.42Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers
Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle MixSite Preparation — — — —Site Preparation Worker 7.50 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDTSite Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTSite Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDTGrading — — — —Grading Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Grading Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDTGrading Hauling 7.50 20.0 HHDTGrading Onsite truck — — HHDTBuilding Construction — — — —Building Construction Worker 14.7 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Building Construction Vendor 2.55 8.40 HHDT,MHDTBuilding Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT

1.b
Packet Pg. 940
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
81 / 92
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving— — — —Paving Worker 12.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDTPaving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTPaving Onsite truck — — HHDTArchitectural Coating — — — —Architectural Coating Worker 2.94 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDTArchitectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTArchitectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle MixSite Preparation — — — —Site Preparation Worker 7.50 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDTSite Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTSite Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDTGrading — — — —Grading Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Grading Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDTGrading Hauling 7.50 20.0 HHDTGrading Onsite truck — — HHDTBuilding Construction — — — —Building Construction Worker 14.7 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Building Construction Vendor 2.55 8.40 HHDT,MHDT

1.b
Packet Pg. 941
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
82 / 92
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDTPaving— — — —Paving Worker 12.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDTPaving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTPaving Onsite truck — — HHDTArchitectural Coating — — — —Architectural Coating Worker 2.94 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDTArchitectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDTArchitectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control StrategiesNon-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.5.5. Architectural Coatings Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior AreaCoated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior AreaCoated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 82,075 27,358 4,748 1,583 680

5.6. Dust Mitigation5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres)Site Preparation — — 1.88 0.00 —

1.b
Packet Pg. 942
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
83 / 92
Grading 2,400 — 40.0 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control StrategiesNon-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.5.7. Construction Paving Land Use Area Paved (acres) % AsphaltCondo/Townhouse — 0%Medical Office Building 0.00 0%Parking Lot 0.13 100%Apartments Low Rise — 0%Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.13 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions FactorskWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.0052026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.0052027 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/YearCondo/Townhouse 117 130 100 42,565 1,326 1,475 1,138 482,059Medical OfficeBuilding 110 27.1 4.49 30,364 1,221 301 49.8 336,494

1.b
Packet Pg. 943
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
84 / 92
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Apartments LowRise

22.0 24.4 18.8 7,981 249 277 213 90,386
Other AsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/YearCondo/Townhouse 117 130 100 42,565 1,326 1,475 1,138 482,059Medical OfficeBuilding 110 27.1 4.49 30,364 1,221 301 49.8 336,494
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Apartments LowRise

22.0 24.4 18.8 7,981 249 277 213 90,386
Other AsphaltSurfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources5.10.1. Hearths5.10.1.1. Unmitigated Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)Condo/Townhouse —Wood Fireplaces 0Gas Fireplaces 0Propane Fireplaces 0Electric Fireplaces 0No Fireplaces 16

1.b
Packet Pg. 944
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
85 / 92
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0Pellet Wood Stoves 0Apartments Low Rise —Wood Fireplaces 0Gas Fireplaces 0Propane Fireplaces 0Electric Fireplaces 0No Fireplaces 3Conventional Wood Stoves 0Catalytic Wood Stoves 0Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.1.2. Mitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)Condo/Townhouse —Wood Fireplaces 0Gas Fireplaces 0Propane Fireplaces 0Electric Fireplaces 0No Fireplaces 16Conventional Wood Stoves 0Catalytic Wood Stoves 0Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0Pellet Wood Stoves 0

1.b
Packet Pg. 945
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
86 / 92
Apartments Low Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0Gas Fireplaces 0Propane Fireplaces 0Electric Fireplaces 0No Fireplaces 3Conventional Wood Stoves 0Catalytic Wood Stoves 0Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
82075.275 27,358 4,748 1,583 680

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit ValueSnow Days day/yr 0.00Summer Days day/yr 180

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit ValueSnow Days day/yr 0.00Summer Days day/yr 180

1.b
Packet Pg. 946
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
87 / 92

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption5.11.1. UnmitigatedElectricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)Condo/Townhouse 68,392 204 0.0330 0.0040 467,593Medical Office Building 66,999 204 0.0330 0.0040 75,170Parking Lot 4,961 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00Apartments Low Rise 11,251 204 0.0330 0.0040 59,878Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.11.2. MitigatedElectricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)Condo/Townhouse 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 467,593Medical Office Building 66,999 204 0.0330 0.0040 75,170Parking Lot 4,961 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00Apartments Low Rise 11,205 204 0.0330 0.0040 59,878Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption5.12.1. Unmitigated Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year)Condo/Townhouse 580,262 56,762Medical Office Building 397,146 65,932Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 947
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
88 / 92
Apartments Low Rise 108,799 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year)Condo/Townhouse 580,262 56,762Medical Office Building 397,146 65,932Parking Lot 0.00 0.00Apartments Low Rise 108,799 0.00Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)Condo/Townhouse 11.8 —Medical Office Building 34.2 —Parking Lot 0.00 —Apartments Low Rise 2.31 —Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)Condo/Townhouse 11.8 —Medical Office Building 34.2 —Parking Lot 0.00 —

1.b
Packet Pg. 948
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
89 / 92
Apartments Low Rise 2.31 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment5.14.1. Unmitigated Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times ServicedCondo/Townhouse Average room A/C & Other residential A/Cand heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Condo/Townhouse Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Medical Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.45 0.60 0.00 1.00
Medical Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/Cand heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times ServicedCondo/Townhouse Average room A/C & Other residential A/Cand heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Condo/Townhouse Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Medical Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.45 0.60 0.00 1.00

1.b
Packet Pg. 949
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
90 / 92
Medical Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/Cand heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment5.15.1. Unmitigated Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

1.b
Packet Pg. 950
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
91 / 92

5.18. Vegetation5.18.1. Land Use Change5.18.1.1. Unmitigated Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

1.b
Packet Pg. 951
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 570 Crespi Drive Custom Report, 7/8/2024
92 / 92

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen JustificationLand Use Changes made based on project-specific information. It should be noted that the low-rise apartment acreage and landscaping are reflected in commercial land use due to being a mixed-use building.On-site parking has 15 spaces under the parking lot category, and the improvements in Parcel 2 areincluded under the Other Asphalt Surfaces category.

Construction: Construction Phases Changes made based on applicant-provided information. Demolition stage not required. Based on typical construction practices, architectural coating assumed to start two weeks after the start ofbuilding construction and last for the same number of days.

Operations: Hearths Natural gas hearths removed due to City prohibition for residential structures.

1.b
Packet Pg. 952
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use AERMOD Model Options
Model Options
Pathway Keyword Description Value
CO TITLEONE Project title 1 Crespi Drive Project Construction Health Risk Assessment CO TITLETWO Project title 2
CO MODELOPT Model options DFAULT,CONC,NODRYDPLT,NOWETDPLT CO AVERTIME Averaging times 1,24,ANNUAL
CO URBANOPT Urban options
CO POLLUTID Pollutant ID PM25 H1H
CO HALFLIFE Half life
CO DCAYCOEF Decay coefficient
CO FLAGPOLE Flagpole receptor heights 1.8
CO RUNORNOT Run or Not RUN
CO EVENTFIL Event file F
CO SAVEFILE Save file F
CO INITFILE Initialization file
CO MULTYEAR Multiple year option N/A
CO DEBUGOPT Debug options N/A
CO ERRORFIL Error file F
SO ELEVUNIT Elevation units METERS
SO EMISUNIT Emission units N/A
RE ELEVUNIT Elevation units METERS
ME SURFFILE Surface met file I:\Projects\Active\Pacifica\570 Crespi Drive\Technical Reports\AQ\HRA\AERMOD\San Francisco International.SFC
ME PROFFILE Profile met file I:\Projects\Active\Pacifica\570 Crespi Drive\Technical Reports\AQ\HRA\AERMOD\San Francisco International.PFL
ME SURFDATA Surf met data info. 23234 2009
ME UAIRDATA U-Air met data info. 23230 2009
ME SITEDATA On-site met data info.

ME PROFBASE Elev. above MSL 2.4
ME STARTEND Start-end met dates
ME WDROTATE Wind dir. rot. adjust.

ME WINDCATS Wind speed cat. max.

ME SCIMBYHR SCIM sample params
EV DAYTABLE Print summary opt. N/A
OU EVENTOUT Output info. level N/A
Report for "Crespi_Aermod.ami" Page 1 of 2
file:///C:/ProgramData/Breeze/AERMOD/20240708115015/ReportsTemp.htm 7/8/2024

1.b
Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Source Parameter Tables
OU DAYTABLE Print summary opt.

All Sources
Source ID /
Pollutant ID Source Type Description UTM Elev. Emiss. Rate Emiss. Units Release
Height
East (m) North (m) (m) (m)
29R3K7E1 VOLUME Construction Equip 544210.9 4161358.8 0 0.0015941 (g/s) 5 Volume Sources
Source ID /
Pollutant ID Description
UTM Elev. Emiss. Rate Release
Height
Init. Lat.

Dim.

Init. Vert.

Dim.

East (m) North (m) (m) (g/s) (m) (m) (m)
29R3K7E1 Construction Equip 544210.9 4161358.8 0 0.0015941 5 29.59 1 Report for "Crespi_Aermod.ami" Page 2 of 2
file:///C:/ProgramData/Breeze/AERMOD/20240708115015/ReportsTemp.htm 7/8/2024

I I I I I I I I

1.b
Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) BREEZE AERMOD Model Results
Max. Annual ( 5 YEARS) Results of Pollutant: PM25 (ug/m**3) Group ID High Avg. Conc.

UTM Elev. Hill Ht. Flag Ht.

Rec. Type Grid ID
East (m) North (m) (m) (m) (m)
ALL 1ST 0.01595 544313.30 4161379.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
2ND 0.01584 544308.30 4161389.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
3RD 0.01528 544313.30 4161384.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
4TH 0.01520 544318.30 4161374.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
5TH 0.01504 544167.10 4161255.70 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
6TH 0.01498 544308.30 4161394.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
7TH 0.01466 544318.30 4161379.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
8TH 0.01457 544313.30 4161389.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
9TH 0.01455 544177.10 4161250.70 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
10TH 0.01455 544162.10 4161255.70 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC
Highest Results of Pollutant: PM25
Avg.

Per.

Grp
ID High Type Val Units
Date UTM Elev.

Hill
Ht.

Flag
Ht. Rec.

Type
Grid
ID
YYMMDDHH East (m)
North
(m) (m) (m) (m)
1-HR ALL 1ST Avg.

Conc. 1.92131 ug/m**3 09011618 544167.10 4161255.70 0.00 0.00 1.80 DC Summary of Total Messages
# Message Type
0 Fatal Error Message(s)
4 Warning Message(s)
6306 Informational Message(s)
43872 Hours Were Processed
5804 Calm Hours Identified
502 Missing Hours Identified ( 1.14 Percent)
Error & Warning Messages
Msg. Type Pathway Ref. # Description
WARNING CO W276 Special proc for 1h-NO2/SO2 24hPM25 NAAQS disabled PM25 H1H WARNING CO W363 Multiyr 24h/Ann PM25 processing not applicable for PM25 H1H Report for "Crespi_Aermod.ami" Page 1 of 2
file:///C:/ProgramData/Breeze/AERMOD/20240708115015/ReportsTemp.htm 7/8/2024 I I I= I I

1.b
Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) www.breeze-software.com
WARNING OU W565 Possible Conflict With Dynamically Allocated FUNIT PLOTFILE WARNING MX W481 Data Remaining After End of Year. Number of Hours= 48 Report for "Crespi_Aermod.ami" Page 2 of 2
file:///C:/ProgramData/Breeze/AERMOD/20240708115015/ReportsTemp.htm 7/8/2024

1.b
Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) *HARP - HRACalc v22118 7/8/2024 11:55:57 AM - Cancer Risk - Input File: C:\Users\jfahrney\Desktop\HARP Results\570 Crespi_HRAInput.hra INDEX GRP1 GRP2 POLID POLABBREV CONC RISK_SUM SCENARIO DETAILS INH_RISK SOIL_RISK DERMAL_RISK MMILK_RISK WATER_RISK FISH_RISK CROP_RISK BEEF_RISK DAIRY_RISK PIG_RISK CHICKEN_RISK EGG_RISK 1ST_DRIVER 2ND_DRIVER PASTURE_CONC FISH_CONC WATER_CONC 1 9901 DieselExhPM 0.01595 4.80E-06 1.75YrCancerHighEnd_Inh_FAH16to70 * 4.80E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

1.b
Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) *HARP - HRACalc v22118 7/8/2024 11:55:57 AM - Chronic Risk - Input File: C:\Users\jfahrney\Desktop\HARP Results\570 Crespi_HRAInput.hra INDEX GRP1 GRP2 POLID POLABBREV CONC SCENARIO CV CNS IMMUN KIDNEY GILV REPRO/DEVEL RESP SKIN EYE BONE/TEETH ENDO BLOOD ODOR GENERAL DETAILS INH_CONC SOIL_DOSE DERMAL_DOSE MMILK_DOSE WATER_DOSE FISH_DOSE CROP_DOSE BEEF_DOSE DAIRY_DOSE PIG_DOSE CHICKEN_DOSE EGG_DOSE 1ST_DRIVER 2ND_DRIVER 3RD_DRIVER PASTURE_CONC FISH_CONC WATER_CONC 1 9901 DieselExhPM 0.016 NonCancerChronicHighEnd_Inh ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## 0.00E+00 ####### ######## ######## 0.00E+00 ######## ######## ######## 0.00E+00 * 1.60E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 INHALATION NA NA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

1.b
Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) *HARP - HRACalc v22118 7/8/2024 11:55:57 AM - Acute Risk - Input File: C:\Users\jfahrney\Desktop\HARP Results\570 Crespi_HRAInput.hra INDEX GRP1 GRP2 POLID POLABBREV CONC SCENARIO CV CNS IMMUN KIDNEY GILV REPRO/DEVEL RESP SKIN EYE BONE/TEETH ENDO BLOOD ODOR GENERAL 1 9901 DieselExhPM 1.92131 NonCancerAcute 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

1.b
Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)

APPENDIX
F

1.b
Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 0HPRUDQGXP
'DWH
  6HSWHPEHU
7R
  0U(DPRQ0XUSK\+RPH6LWH6HUYLFHV,QF
)URP
  .DLOLQJ.XR
6XEMHFW
 907$QDO\VLVIRU3URSRVHG0L[HG8VH'HYHORSPHQWDW&UHVSL'ULYHLQ3DFLILFD &DOLIRUQLD
+H[DJRQ7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ&RQVXOWDQWV,QFKDVFRPSOHWHGD9HKLFOH0LOHV7UDYHOHG 907
DQDO\VLV
IRUWKHSURSRVHGPL[HGXVHGHYHORSPHQWDW&UHVSL'ULYHLQ3DFLILFD&DOLIRUQLD VHH)LJXUH

7KHSURMHFWZRXOGFRQVLVWRIWRZQKRPHXQLWVEHORZPDUNHWUDWH %05
FRQGRPLQLXPXQLWV
DQGVTXDUHIHHW
VI
RIJURXQGIORRUFRPPHUFLDOVSDFH
VHH)LJXUH
7KHEXLOGLQJVZRXOG
EHFRQVWUXFWHGRQWKHQRUWKHUQPRVWKDOIRIWKHVLWHZKLOHWKHVRXWKHUQPRVWKDOIRIWKHVLWHZRXOG UHPDLQXQGLVWXUEHG7KHSURMHFWZRXOGLQYROYHRIIVLWHLPSURYHPHQWVLQFOXGLQJFRQVWUXFWLRQRID QHZGULYHZD\DQGDVVRFLDWHGSDUNLQJVSDFHVZLWKLQWKHQRUWKHUQSRUWLRQRIWKHH[LVWLQJ3DFLILFD &RPPXQLW\&HQWHUORFDWHGLPPHGLDWHO\WRWKHZHVWDW&UHVSL'ULYH VHH)LJXUH

7KHSXUSRVHRIWKLVVWXG\LVWRDQDO\]HWKHSURMHFW¶VSRWHQWLDOWUDQVSRUWDWLRQLPSDFWRQ907DVSDUW RIWKHHQYLURQPHQWDODQDO\VLV$WUDIILFLPSDFWDQDO\VLV 7,$
EDVHGRQLQWHUVHFWLRQOHYHORIVHUYLFH

/26
ZDVSUHSDUHGIRUWKH&(4$,QLWLDO6WXG\RIWKHSURMHFW 'HFHPEHU
6LQFHWKHQWKH
&(4$UHTXLUHPHQWVKDYHFKDQJHGDQGWKHWUDQVSRUWDWLRQLPSDFWVZLOOEHDVVHVVHGEDVHGRQ YHKLFOHPLOHVWUDYHOHG
907
UDWKHUWKDQ/26
6FRSHRI6WXG\
$FFRUGLQJWR&(4$JXLGHOLQHVSXEOLVKHGLQDQGEHFRPLQJPDQGDWRU\LQWUDQVSRUWDWLRQ LPSDFWVRIQHZGHYHORSPHQWVVKRXOGEHHYDOXDWHGXVLQJ9077KHJRDOLVWRUHGXFH907ZKLFK UHGXFHVWKHRYHUDOOEXUGHQRQWKHWUDQVSRUWDWLRQV\VWHPDQGUHGXFHVJUHHQKRXVHJDVHPLVVLRQV 7RKHOSJXLGHOHDGDJHQFLHVWKH2IILFHRI3ODQQLQJDQG5HVHDUFK 235
SXEOLVKHG7HFKQLFDO
$GYLVRU\RQ(YDOXDWLQJ7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ,PSDFWVLQ&(4$LQ'HFHPEHU6LQFHWKH&LW\KDVQRW \HWDGRSWHGD907SROLF\RUVLJQLILFDQFHWKUHVKROGVUHODWHGWR907WKH907DQDO\VLVZDVEDVHG RQWKHVFUHHQLQJFULWHULDWKUHVKROGVRIVLJQLILFDQFHDQGDSSURDFKGHVFULEHGLQWKH235¶V 7HFKQLFDO$GYLVRU\DQGWKH&LW\¶VUHFHQW*HQHUDO3ODQ(,5 

:KHQDVVHVVLQJWKH907LPSDFWDSURMHFW¶V907OHYHOLVPHDVXUHGLQDYHUDJHGDLO\907SHU FDSLWDIRUUHVLGHQWLDOODQGXVHDQGDYHUDJHGDLO\907SHUZRUNHUIRUFRPPHUFLDOODQGXVHDQG FRPSDUHGWRWKHDSSURSULDWHWKUHVKROGVRIVLJQLILFDQFH235UHFRPPHQGVWKDWQHZGHYHORSPHQWV VKRXOGXWLOL]HDWKUHVKROGWKDWLVEHORZEDVHOLQH
H[LVWLQJ
FRQGLWLRQV%DVHOLQHFRQGLWLRQVPD\
EHGHILQHGDVWKHH[LVWLQJUHJLRQDODYHUDJH907FRXQW\DYHUDJH907RUFLW\DYHUDJH907 3DFLILFD¶VUHFHQW*HQHUDO3ODQ(,5XVHGDWKUHVKROGRIEHORZWKHH[LVWLQJFLW\ZLGHDYHUDJHDV DWKUHVKROG
235UHFRPPHQGVWKDWVPDOOODQGXVHSURMHFWVWKDWJHQHUDWHRUDWWUDFWIHZHUWKDQWULSVSHUGD\ JHQHUDOO\PD\EHDVVXPHGWRFDXVHDOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW907LPSDFW7KHUHIRUHLIDSURMHFW ODQGXVHFRPSRQHQWZRXOGJHQHUDWHWULSVSHUGD\RUIHZHUWKHSURMHFWODQGXVHFRPSRQHQW ZRXOGPHHWWKHVFUHHQLQJFULWHULRQDQGZRXOGKDYHDOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW907LPSDFW jiiP ~
Q __ ~~XAGON T~ANSPO~TATION (ONSULTANTS, IN<.
("'""'\
CID
• •
-0-
,..

Q
, '
100 Century Center Court, Suite 501 • San Jose, Cal ifornia 95112 • phone 408 .971 .6100 • fax 408.971.6102 • www.hextrans.com

1.b
Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) Source: 570 Crespi Drive Project Initial Study, December 2021 570 Crespi Drive Project
Figure 1
Site Location
Cabrillo
Elementary
School
Ocean View
Senior Apartments
Pacifica
Community
Center
Pacifica
Skatepark
Off-Site
Improvement Area
Overall
Project Site
Remainder
Portion
Development
Area
L...LJ
><
-<C
'-:::7
c:>
z::
:::::::c

1.b
Packet Pg. 962
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Source: 570 Crespi Drive Project Initial Study, December 2021 570 Crespi Drive Project
Figure 2
Site Plan
=
= DEVEl(J>fl) COWWOO -'HD OPEN SPACE Mlf.A (23,717.12 Sf.) r - - - - 7 VACANT/\JNDEVELCffD AREA
I I l3,372,65SF,) L
____ .J &I <DIERAL NOlE 11
/y
-,
f "\
~ ! :
: ( \
<;
I
I
I
I
I
I
; I
'°'"'Jh, 4 I
I
I
I \

REMOVE TREE
(TYPICAL Cf"
2 AT t£W COMMUNITY
1CENTERDRtfOIT)
I
I
I
I
I
I
• I' : , I \ :

I: II
fl ' / -- ' - :J\ :

I . I ' '.)=i,cw OR<>'-<tP.I ,,, I
· , 1-• ,' 1 t \
. ,,. INGRESS &EGREES ,' J f ~J'ornrnAc' '1 11,
// E>SEMENT OVER """'"'TY CEN11:R I / ~Q].E 10 G j'
. PARCE~,'."',~~;~; ~~'~";,'Tlt ""6~ , •• ' . ~I i ••. : ' 11, • TAINf.lENT
A
, . -· - - ff.. • •• ~~1(' "' rt , .. ,,,. M~.,
.,~ •• ·::;$" • . .i :, l ' ' " ' ·•
• • .~,~~="~:;c;·-~:. --·-v;J_·---·.:f!i~;;IJ:i~~ I: .,; -· ~ -• "' -r.-:-_ -;., ,_J ,k,.,__~.- 1 I,_ /,-;:«'l:~ \~ ~:
\,, - ,.,.,.~w -~
;;;,
k .• ~:,~;-,m: -
;::

TRASH
== _;::-,-.
fwrl !,W'""" - ' APN 022- 162- 2.JO -.
,/
,, /
?ilitio,~i(,,
- l'AllCl'L A
(PORTION 'pAffW.. S OF APN 022-1 62- 420)
(SEE GENERAL NOTE 10) J0,221 + F ,so. FT
I/IRSI/Mai
APN 022-162-22()
" I _,• -~•;t;!;,,,,,_ ••' ,.__,, ., ;,,
V "-. - ••\__
----------------------
\
r, '.
\ ·~ )
' Jt"'
• <~
.ESSIG), ANN-1,/ARIE GIMEHE ~· _/ APN 022 162- 210 / J . " . i~ -
.\
LIMIT Cf EXISTING
VACANT;\JNDE\-El.CH:D
AREA 10 REMAIN
V4CANT/\JNDE'v£1..CffD
33,372.655.F.

SEE <DIERAL ~TE 11
'PROPOSED· PARCEL ·I,
72,984 +/-~ SQ. FT
1,, !-!>~ ,.,!>~"-1 '\.-_.,:t (;PAO:~ :OJ( '!:'_'
'r-WJAN YAN/NA i.

Pi\RCFl , B
(Af'N_022- 162- 310)
-42,76~/, SO. FT
I .,~/ A --
l..t.or LINE m 1£ aJMINA'TEo
/

PER LOT MERGER
\N[ Ml
A~ '.A 42,
"GRASS auE"

PAVEMENT AREA
{506.°31 9')
/ --
,
I
I
,
-
-'\'-,
.\;-

BUJLDTNGA
{l.306:,_fS.F.'!';" is:SEE GENERAL ~. NOTE 9),,
-.I'" , ......
• " I "',·-~ ----~'
Pfl™
_
oos "-. ·"
PA'l'tR y~'
INTERSknoo '
11:l
ASl%11.T
----- -·-·- -----,1'/PIC'AlJ·------- - - -- ---i'~ \ -~~~;;.,.

APN 022- 162- 200 \\ ;,6 u =-e' ·"
-~
,, .. ,.z:.__,........_ • "' _;J. ----M~ YS0inn, ,''t- '"'•~ .r-- ~ ------,---i;.;;;-~---.,--- ~• '-:

APN ,12'!\i~:&'1"' musr =.~ ''"'"' TREE ~ (TIP<Al) ;
,.........
.......... ~~XA60N
,.:::"'_,o ..
' TO REMAIN

BE PROTECTED
w.::>'""''"' o \ c;:_:r~,:~:.,·
I •
I
\i·, \~ </ ' 1\'
I • L.,. J ?. rRB10Vf:TREE
(1"1CAL)
··1
NORTH
Not to Scale

1.b
Packet Pg. 963
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use 907$QDO\VLVIRU&UHVSL'ULYH0L[HG8VH'HYHORSPHQW 6HSWHPEHU 3DJH _
7KHSURMHFWLQFOXGHVWZRW\SHVRIODQGXVHV
UHVLGHQWLDODQGFRPPHUFLDO
IRUZKLFKWKHSRWHQWLDO
907LPSDFWZDVHYDOXDWHGVHSDUDWHO\DQGFRPSDUHGWRWKHVFUHHQLQJFULWHULDDQGWKUHVKROGVRI VLJQLILFDQFHEDVHGRQWKHODQGXVHW\SH
)RUWKHSURMHFWFRPSRQHQWWKDWZRXOGQRWPHHWWKHVFUHHQLQJFULWHULRQWKH&LW\&RXQW\$VVRFLDWLRQ RI*RYHUQPHQWVRI6DQ0DWHR&RXQW\
&&$*
907(VWLPDWLRQ7RROZDVXVHGWRHVWLPDWHG907
IURPWKHSURSRVHGODQGXVHDQGFRPSDUHGWRDVLJQLILFDQFHWKUHVKROG7KHSHUFHQWDJHRIUHGXFWLRQ UHTXLUHGWRPLWLJDWHWKH907LPSDFWVZDVLGHQWLILHGDQGSRVVLEOHLPSURYHPHQWVWRUHGXFHWKH 907LPSDFWVDUHGLVFXVVHG
6FUHHQLQJIRU907$QDO\VLV([HPSWLRQ
'DLO\YHKLFOHWULSVWKDWZRXOGEHJHQHUDWHGE\WKHSURMHFWZHUHHVWLPDWHGEDVHGRQWKHDYHUDJH GDLO\WULSUDWHSXEOLVKHGLQWKH,QVWLWXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV¶ ,7(
Trip Generation Manual
WK(GLWLRQIRU³0HGLFDO'HQWDO2IILFH%XLOGLQJ´
/DQG8VH
IRU³6LQJOH)DPLO\$WWDFKHG
+RXVLQJ´
/DQG8VH
DQGIRU³0XOWLIDPLO\+RXVLQJ/RZ5LVH´
/DQG8VH

VHH7DEOH

7KHSURSRVHGFRPPHUFLDOXVHZRXOGJHQHUDWHGDLO\WULSVZKLFKZRXOGPHHWWKHVFUHHQLQJ FULWHULRQIRUVPDOOSURMHFWVDQGZRXOGUHVXOWLQDOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW907LPSDFW+RZHYHUWKH SURSRVHGUHVLGHQWLDOXVHZRXOGJHQHUDWHPRUHWKDQGDLO\WULSVDQGUHTXLUHVD907DQDO\VLVWR HYDOXDWHLWV907LPSDFW
7DEOH 
3URMHFW7ULS*HQHUDWLRQ(VWLPDWH
/DQG8VH 6L]H 5DWH 7ULSV 5DWH 7ULSV 5DWH 7ULSV
&RPPHUFLDO
0HGLFDO'HQWDO2IILFH%XLOGLQJ  NVI        5HVLGHQWLDO
6LQJOH)DPLO\$WWDFKHG+RXVLQJ  XQLWV       

0XOWLIDPLO\+RXVLQJ/RZ5LVH  XQLWV        Total Residential Trips 137
6RXUFH
,7(7ULS*HQHUDWLRQ0DQXDOWK(GLWLRQ
$YHUDJHWULSUDWHVH[SUHVVHGLQWULSVSHUVTXDUHIHHW NVI
IRU0HGLFDO'HQWDO2IILFH%XLOGLQJ
/DQG8VH
DUHXVHG
$YHUDJHWULSUDWHVH[SUHVVHGLQWULSVSHUGZHOOLQJXQLWIRU6LQJOH)DPLO\$WWDFKHG+RXVLQJ /DQG8VH
DUHXVHG
$YHUDJHWULSUDWHVH[SUHVVHGLQWULSVSHUGZHOOLQJXQLWIRU0XOWLIDPLO\+RXVLQJ/RZ5LVH /DQG8VH
DUHXVHG
:HHNGD\ 6DWXUGD\ 6XQGD\ $YHUDJH
'DLO\7ULSV
907$QDO\VLV
7KH907DQDO\VLVIRUWKHSURSRVHGUHVLGHQWLDOXVHZDVFRQGXFWHGE\FRPSDULQJWKHHVWLPDWHG GDLO\907WRWKHDYHUDJHFLW\ZLGH907WRGHWHUPLQHZKHWKHUWKHSURSRVHGUHVLGHQWLDOXVHZRXOG JHQHUDWH907EHORZWKHDYHUDJHFLW\ZLGH907SHUFDSLWD%DVHGRQWKH&&$*907 (VWLPDWLRQ7RROWKHDYHUDJHGDLO\907SHUFDSLWDIRUUHVLGHQWVLQ3DFLILFDLV \HDU

7KHUHIRUHWKH&(4$WKUHVKROG907LVPLOHVSHUFDSLWDZKLFKLVEHORZWKHFLW\ZLGH 907
7KH7,$RIWKHSURMHFWXVHGWKH,7(WULSUDWHVIRU0HGLFDO'HQWDO2IILFH%XLOGLQJEHFDXVHLWLVWKHKLJKHVW SUREDEOHXVHJLYHQVL]HDQGORFDWLRQ
 KWWSV
JLVVPFJRYRUJDSSV&&$*B907B(VWLPDWLRQ7RRO
DFFHVVHGRQ$XJXVW

1.b
Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 907$QDO\VLVIRU&UHVSL'ULYH0L[HG8VH'HYHORSPHQW 6HSWHPEHU 3DJH _
:LWKLQWKLVSDUWRI3DFLILFD
7UDIILF$QDO\VLV=RQH

WKHGDLO\907IURPWKHPRGHOLVPLOHV
SHUFDSLWDLQWKH\HDU
VHH$SSHQGL[$
7KH907IRUWKH7$=LQFOXGLQJWKHSURMHFWVLWHLV
FRQVLGHUHGWREHUHSUHVHQWDWLYHRIWKHSURMHFWLWVHOIEHFDXVHWKHSURMHFW WRZQKRPHV
LVHTXLYDOHQW
WRWKHRWKHUUHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQWLQWKHDUHD%HFDXVHWKHGDLO\907LVKLJKHUWKDQWKH WKUHVKROGWKHSURMHFWZRXOGKDYHDSRWHQWLDOVLJQLILFDQWLPSDFWRQ907$UHGXFWLRQLQGDLO\ WULSVZRXOGEHQHFHVVDU\WRPLWLJDWHWKHLPSDFW
0LWLJDWLRQV
7KH&DOLIRUQLD$LU3ROOXWLRQ&RQWURO2IILFHUV$VVRFLDWLRQ &$3&2$
UHSRUWHandbook for Analyzing
Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity (December 2021) HVWLPDWHV907UHGXFWLRQUHODWLYHWRDSURMHFW¶VGHVLJQIHDWXUHVDQG DSSOLFDEOH7'0PHDVXUHV7KHHVWLPDWHGUHGXFWLRQLQ907EDVHGRQWKHSURMHFW¶VGHVLJQIHDWXUHV DQGSRWHQWLDOPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVDUHGHVFULEHGEHORZ:LWKLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKLVPLWLJDWLRQ SURJUDPWKHSURMHFWFRXOGDFKLHYHDUHGXFWLRQLQ907 VHH$SSHQGL[%

x /DQG8VH±$907UHGXFWLRQFDQEHDFKLHYHGIRUGHYHORSPHQWVEDVHGRQWKHODQGXVH GHVLJQDQGORFDWLRQ7KHSURMHFWZRXOGLQFUHDVHWKHUHVLGHQWLDODQGHPSOR\PHQWGHQVLW\ DQGZRXOGSURYLGHWKUHHDIIRUGDEOHXQLWV
DERXWRIWRWDOUHVLGHQWLDOXQLWV

o ,QWHJUDWH$IIRUGDEOHDQG%HORZ0DUNHW5DWH+RXVLQJ
&$3&2$0HDVXUH7
±
7KHSURMHFWSURSRVHGWRSURYLGHSHUFHQWRIWKHDOORZDEOHEDVHGHQVLW\KRXVLQJ DVDIIRUGDEOHXQLWV
XQLWV
3HUJXLGDQFHIURPWKH&$3&2$UHSRUWDQGFDOFXODWLRQV IURPWKH&&$*907(VWLPDWLRQ7RROD907UHGXFWLRQFDQEHDFKLHYHG x 1HLJKERUKRRG'HVLJQ6LWH(QKDQFHPHQW±$907UHGXFWLRQFDQEHDFKLHYHGIRU GHYHORSPHQWVZLWKSHGHVWULDQIULHQGO\GHVLJQV
o 3HGHVWULDQ1HWZRUN,PSURYHPHQW
&$3&2$0HDVXUH7
±7KHSURMHFWZRXOG
SURYLGHSHGHVWULDQZDONZD\VZLWKLQWKHVLWHDQGLPSOHPHQWRIIVLWHLPSURYHPHQWV ZLWKLQWKHQRUWKHUQSRUWLRQRIWKHH[LVWLQJ3DFLILFD&RPPXQLW\&HQWHULQFOXGLQJ SHGHVWULDQFRQQHFWLRQVZLWKLQWKHLPSURYHPHQWDUHDDQGIURPWKHSURMHFWVLWHWRWKH 3DFLILFD&RPPXQLW\&HQWHU5HVHDUFKKDVVKRZQWKDWFUHDWLQJSHGHVWULDQIULHQGO\ FRQQHFWLRQVUHGXFHDXWRPRELOHWULSVDQGLQFUHDVHWKHOLNHOLKRRGRIUHVLGHQWV ZDONLQJ%DVHGRQ+DQGERRNDQGFDOFXODWLRQVIURPWKH&&$*907 (VWLPDWLRQ7RRODUHGXFWLRQLQWKH1HLJKERUKRRG'HVLJQFDWHJRU\ZDV DSSOLHG
x 7ULS5HGXFWLRQ3URJUDP±$907UHGXFWLRQFRXOGEHDFKLHYHGIRUSURYLGLQJDWUDQVLWIDUH VXEVLG\5HGXFLQJWKHRXWRISRFNHWFRVWIRUFKRRVLQJWUDQVLWLPSURYHVWKHFRPSHWLWLYHQHVV RIWUDQVLWDJDLQVWGULYLQJLQFUHDVLQJWKHWRWDOQXPEHURIWUDQVLWWULSVDQGGHFUHDVLQJYHKLFOH WULSVDQGWKHUHIRUHUHGXFH907
o 7UDQVLW)DUH6XEVLG\
&$3&2$0HDVXUH7

±6DP7UDQV5RXWHV
3&;
RSHUDWHDORQJ&UHVSL'ULYHZLWKWKHFORVHVWEXVVWRSORFDWHGDERXWIHHWDZD\ IURPWKHSURMHFWVLWH6DP7UDQV5RXWHVDQGRSHUDWHDORQJ+LJKZD\ZLWK WKHFORVHVWEXVVWRSORFDWHGDWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRI+LJKZD\DQG&UHVSL'ULYH ZKLFKLVDERXWIHHWDZD\IURPWKHSURMHFWVLWH7UDQVLWVXEVLGLHVDUHQRW SUDFWLFDOIRURZQHUVKLSXQLWV
7RZQKRPHVDQGFRQGRPLQLXPV
RQDQRQJRLQJEDVLV
+RZHYHUWZRIUHHRQH\HDUWUDQVLWSDVVFRXOGEHJLYHQWRHDFKQHZRZQHUXSRQ RULJLQDOSXUFKDVHIURPWKHGHYHORSHU%\SURYLGLQJUHVLGHQWVZLWKWUDQVLWSDVVHVLW PD\HQFRXUDJHQHZUHVLGHQWVWRXWLOL]HWUDQVLWUDWKHUWKDQGULYLQJWRZRUN3HU

1.b
Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) 907$QDO\VLVIRU&UHVSL'ULYH0L[HG8VH'HYHORSPHQW 6HSWHPEHU 3DJH _
JXLGDQFHIURPWKH&$3&2$+DQGERRNDQGFDOFXODWLRQVIURPWKH&&$*907 (VWLPDWLRQ7RRODUHGXFWLRQRI907FRXOGEHDFKLHYHG &RQFOXVLRQV
7KHSURSRVHGFRPPHUFLDOXVHRIWKHSURMHFWZRXOGJHQHUDWHGDLO\WULSVZKLFKZRXOGPHHWWKH VFUHHQLQJFULWHULRQRIGDLO\WULSVIRUVPDOOSURMHFWVDQGZRXOGUHVXOWLQDOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW 907LPSDFW+RZHYHUWKHSURSRVHGUHVLGHQWLDOXVHZRXOGJHQHUDWHPRUHWKDQGDLO\WULSVDQG UHTXLUHVD907DQDO\VLVWRHYDOXDWHLWV907LPSDFW
%DVHGRQWKH&&$*907(VWLPDWLRQ7RROWKH907RIWKHSURMHFWDUHDLVHVWLPDWHGWREHSHU FDSLWDLQ\HDUZKLFKH[FHHGWKHVLJQLILFDQFHWKUHVKROGRISHUFDSLWD7KHUHIRUHWKH SURMHFWZRXOGQHHGWRUHGXFHLWV907E\WRPLWLJDWHWKHSRWHQWLDOO\VLJQLILFDQWLPSDFW:LWKD FRPELQDWLRQRIVLWHGHVLJQIHDWXUHVWRSURPRWHDOWHUQDWLYHWUDQVSRUWDWLRQPHWKRGVDQG WUDQVSRUWDWLRQGHPDQGPDQDJHPHQW
7'0
IHDWXUHVWKHSURMHFWLVHVWLPDWHGWREHDEOHWRUHGXFH WKH907JHQHUDWHGE\XSWRZKLFKZRXOGQRWEHHQRXJKWRPLWLJDWHWKHSURMHFW¶V907 LPSDFW7KXVWKHSURMHFW¶VLPSDFWWR907ZRXOGEHVLJQLILFDQWDQGXQDYRLGDEOH

1.b
Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations) $SSHQGL[$ 
&&$*907(VWLPDWLRQ5HSRUW

1.b
Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)





















!"#$!$"#$
$%
%&
'

 ()!



*

+







 &

+

,

+%#-(





.

/

,

+




01

+2'34
5
 6!$$-$%! &$(











*+


7+

68

9
 $!$"

/+:



+



4


:
,




:

:


!
';

+


<=>4
/*


>4
1+,


>4


+



+


3

,

5  ?


/@1

 !A
/@1

 !A/@1

 !AB


7
B

8

B


DJ
Linda Mar
Shopping
Center
, ,~
Cabrillo
Elementary
School
S ..--o or ere'·
"Ss;~I'

1.b
Packet Pg. 968
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use






$


+

7


*+35

,

/+:


 

+

C

7,


 D
;8
+

+
8








*8

,
 (.)7
7+




 ;(A/+:
7
 ;+

7/E,

+



 '
C

7,

C

7
F
;%
+,



C

7
F+,





+7


*+35

).% , ,
/@


'34
5 , ,
ctl
+-' 'c..
ctl
u
--- f-
>
VMT Metric Value
Before Project 1
VMT With Project and
11er 1-3 VMT
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 13.34 VMT Values
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions

1.b
Packet Pg. 969
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use $SSHQGL[% 
&&$*907(VWLPDWLRQ5HSRUWZLWK0LWLJDWLRQV

1.b
Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use Project Considerations)





















!"#$!$"#$
"
$%
&

 '%!



(

)







 *

)

+

),#-'





.

/

+

)




01

)2&34
5
 6!$$-$,! *$'











()


7)

68

9
 $!$"

/):



)



4


:
+




:
 *
:

 *&;

)


<=>4

,
/(


>4
1)+


>4


)



)


3

+

5  ?


/@1

 !A
/@1

 !A/@1

 -AB


7
B

8

B


DJ
Linda Mar
Shopping
Center
, ,~
Cabrillo
Elementary
School
S ..--o or ere'·
"Ss;~I'

1.b
Packet Pg. 971
Attachment: ATT A-Draft Resolution EIR+Exhibits-570 Crespi-251202 (6098 : Crespi Drive Mixed Use






$


)

7


()35

+

/):


 

)

C

7+


 D
;8
)

)
8








(8

+
 '.%7
7)




 ;'A/):
7
 ;)

7/E+

)



 &
C

7+

C

7
F
;,
)+



C

7
F)+





)7


()35

%., -.- -.'
/@


&34
5 &34
5 &34
5
ctl
+-' 'c..
ctl
u
--- f-
>
.
•
. . ,. . . . ,. ,. .
• . . . . . • . . . • . • • • ,I 13.8 .
•
......
• •
,. I . . . . . . .
. . . . . . -· . .
.
. . . . . .
• •
·--. • . . . . • . . . . . • • . . . • 17.3 "·
,. ,. • .
• • . .
,--· . . • . . . •
VMT Metric Value
Before Project 1
.
,.
~
,
. .
,.
··-· •••••
•••
.