Pacifica City Council
August 24, 2026

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Christine Boles
Vice Mayor Greg Wright
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Mayra Espinosa
City Council Regular Meeting 1 August 24, 2026
August 24, 2026 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Off-street parking is allowed by permit for attendance at official public meetings.

Vehicles parked without permits are subject to citation. You should obtain a permit from the rack in the lobby and place it on the dashboard of your vehicle in such a manner as is visible to law enforcement personnel.

PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES DURING MEETING
Observe and Participate in the Meeting: This meeting is held in-person at the meeting location published in the meeting agenda and includes the following remote access options to observe and participate:
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • Watch on TV on Comcast channel 27
• Watch a Live Stream of the meeting by following https://www.cityofpacifica.org/LiveStream or www.pacificcoast.tv
• Live Remote Public Comments:
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • OR Dial-in: 1-669-900-6833 | Webinar ID: 811 5615 8241 o Press * 9 to raise your hand to request to speak.
o Press * 6 to unmute when called upon to speak by the last 4-digits of your phone #. • When the Mayor announces the Agenda Item on which you would like to comment, raise your hand in Zoom. You will be called upon my screenname or last 4-digits of phone number if dialing in. Please mute any background sound and state your full name at the start of your comment.

Please note that remote access platforms for participation are subject to underlying technology functionality; any disruption of the remote access will be addressed pursuant to Administrative Policy No. 85, a copy of which is available on the City’s website at https://www.cityofpacifica.org/government/citycouncil/city-council-agendas . • Written Public Comments:

BEFORE THE MEETING: Written public comments may be submitted in advance by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date by email to: [email protected]. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
• Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public Comment on Item Not on Agenda” in the Subject Line
• Include the submitter’s full name
Written public comments received by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date will be provided in their entirety to the City Council and posted to the City’s website prior to the meeting but will not be read verbally at the meeting.

AT THE MEETING: Materials in writing provided at the meeting should provide seven (7) copies to provide for each Councilmember, City Clerk and City staff.

City Council Regular Meeting 2 August 24, 2026
NOTE: Anyone requiring assistance or reasonable accommodations pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act for access to the meeting, related materials and/or ability to comment should provide at least 24 hours advance notice to the City Manager’s Office (650) 738-7301, or send request via email to: [email protected]. All meeting rooms are accessible to the disabled.
6:00 PM - CLOSED SESSION
00a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Government Code section 54956.9. One Potential Case. 00b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION. Pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code section 54956.9. Name of case: Dan Stegink, et al. v. Sarah Coffey, et al. San Mateo County Superior Court Case No. 26- CIV06367.
7:00 PM OPEN SESSION (ESTIMATED START TIME)
Call to Order
Roll Call
Reading of Land Acknowledgment
The City of Pacifica acknowledges that we occupy the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. We honor the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples for their enduring commitment to Mother Earth. As the Indigenous protectors of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. We affirm their sovereign rights as First Peoples and wish to pay our respects to the ancestors, elders, and relatives of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples.

Salute to the Flag led by Councilmember Espinosa
Closed Session Report

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation: Suicide Prevention Month - September 2026 B. Proclamation: National Preparedness Month - September 2026

CONSENT CALENDAR
Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council on any item listed on the agenda should submit a speaker card to the City Clerk.

City Council Regular Meeting 3 August 24, 2026
Public meetings are a limited public forum, meaning that there are rules for commenting at these meetings. Comments on consent agenda items must relate to that specific item.

If comments do not relate to a specific agenda item, then City will provide you with an initial warning to stay on topic. If the warning is not followed, the Mayor will direct the City Clerk to cut off the microphone.

Items on the consent calendar will be adopted by one motion unless a Councilmember requests, before the vote on the motion, to have an item discussed. Time limit on comments is three minutes or less.

1. Approval of Disbursements for 07/01/26 through 07/31/26 PROPOSED ACTION: Receive and file the Monthly Check Register Report for the month of July 2026

2. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes for the May 11, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting and the May 26, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting.

3. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the End of Beach Boulevard
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

4. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Pacifica Municipal Pier and the Order of Director of Emergency Services Relating to Temporary Closure of the Pier PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of a local emergency continue to exist at the Pacifica Municipal Pier.

5. Adoption of Resolution Ratifying and Approving City Manager / Director of Emergency Services’ approval of the Emergency Public Works Agreement (“Agreement”) with Power Engineering Construction Co. for the Emergency Investigation and Stabilization of the Pacifica Municipal Pier.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution ratifying and approving the City Manager / Director of Emergency Services’ approval of an Emergency Public Works Agreement with Power Engineering Construction Co. for Emergency Investigation and Stabilization of the Pacifica Municipal Pier.

6. Approve the agreement with the County of San Mateo, Behavioral Health and Recovery Services (BHRS) to expand the Community Wellness and Crisis Response Team (CWCRT) pilot program in the City of Pacifica and to share the costs of one full-time mental health clinician in Pacifica as part of the CWCRT pilot program.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution approving a three-year agreement between the County of San Mateo and the City of Pacifica to share the costs of one full-time mental health clinician in Pacifica as part of the Community Wellness and Crisis Response Team (CWCRT) pilot program for an estimated annual cost of $88,369, which shall be prorated based on the clinician’s start date; and authorizing the City Manager to sign the Agreement.

City Council Regular Meeting 4 August 24, 2026

7. Authorize the acceptance of $31,222.27 from the State of California’s Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program, and authorizing execution of the related grant agreement with the California Highway Patrol, for the education, prevention, and enforcement of impaired driving laws.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica authorizing the acceptance of $31,222.27 from the State of California’s Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program, and authorizing execution of the related grant agreement with the California Highway Patrol, for the education, prevention, and enforcement of impaired driving laws.

8. Authorizing Submittal of an Individual Application to CalRecycle for the Beverage Container Recycling Grant Program (FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28) PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution authorizing submittal of an individual application to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for the Beverage Container Recycling Grant Program for FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28, and authorizing the City Manager, or their designee, as Signature Authority to execute grant-related documents necessary to secure grant funds and implement an approved project.

9. Approve Consultant Service Agreement with Rincon Consultants, Inc. For CEQA Related Consulting Services
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager toexecute a Consulting Services Agreement with Rincon Consultants, Inc., in a form approved by the City Attorney, for an amount not-to-exceed $206,888.

10. Approve Calera Creek Water Recycling Plant On-Call Maintenance Services P033 PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution:

A. Approving the Construction Contract with Corcus Construction, Inc. in an amount of $200,000.

B. Authorizing a budget authority in the amount of $200,000.

C. Authorizing the City Manager and Designated Personnel to Sign Contract Documents related to the CCWRP On-Call Maintenance Services P033.

11. Authorization to Lift the Temporary Hiring Freeze for One Firefighter Engineer position.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to lift the temporary six-month hiring freeze for a vacant, budgeted Firefighter Engineer position and proceed with recruitment and hiring within the existing FY 2026-27 Adopted Budget.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
This portion of the Agenda is available for the public to address the City Council on any issue that is not on the Agenda. Any person wishing to address the Council shall be recognized by the Mayor during this time, provided, however, that only items not on the Agenda for that meeting may be addressed. Comments on non-agendized items must address matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. If comments do not address matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City, the City will provide City Council Regular Meeting 5 August 24, 2026
you with an initial warning to stay within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. If the warning is not followed, the Mayor will direct the City Clerk to cut off the microphone.

Councilmembers shall not enter into debate with speakers under Public Comments on Items Not on the Posted Agenda. A maximum of three minutes will be allowed for any speaker.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

12. Continuation of File No. 2026-006 – Public Hearing Text Amendment TA-129-26, initiated by the City of Pacifica, to repeal and replace Article 41 Density Bonus Program and Article 47 City of Pacifica Below Market Rate (Inclusionary) Program of the City of Pacifica Zoning Regulations (Title 9, Chapter 4 of the Pacifica Municipal Code) relating to the implementation of state density bonus law and regulations for inclusionary housing and below market rate units, respectively.

PROPOSED ACTION: Continue public hearing to the September 14, 2026, City Council meeting.

CONSIDERATION

13. Designation of Voting Delegate for League of California Cities Annual Conference PROPOSED ACTION: Designate a voting delegate and alternate(s) who will attend the 2026 League of California Cities (CalCities) Annual Conference General Assembly Meeting on Friday, September 25, 2026.

14. Direction to Pacifica Voting Delegate Regarding CalCities 2026 Annual Conference Resolution Packet
PROPOSED ACTION: Provide direction to Pacifica's voting delegate to support one resolution to be considered by the League of California Cities (CalCities) at the 2026 CalCities Annual Conference to be held in Anaheim, September 23-25, 2026 - Resolution on Calling for Working Group to Consider State Constitutional Amendment or Other Form of Initiative to Ensure Final Local Authority Over Housing and Land Use Decisions.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Council Communications is for Councilmembers to inform each other of items of potential interest to other Councilmembers, such as interagency meetings.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Staff Communications is for the City Manager to offer announcements as appropriate.

ADJOURN
NOTICE: If you challenge a city's zoning, planning or other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Judicial review of any city administrative decision may be had only if a petition is filed with the court not later than the 90th day following the date upon which the decision becomes City Council Regular Meeting 6 August 24, 2026
final. Judicial review of environmental determinations may be subject to a shorter time period for litigation, in certain cases 30 days following the date of the final decision The Pacifica Municipal Code is available online at the City’s website (www.cityofpacifica.org/municode);

HOW TO OBTAIN CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS
Posted agendas:

Agendas are posted no later than Friday prior to the City Council meeting date, at the entrance to the City Hall location at 170 Santa Maria Avenue, Pacifica.

View on the Internet:

Follow the link to Council agenda, at www.cityofpacifica.org E-mail subscription:

Send a request to Sarah Coffey, at [email protected] City Clerk’s Office/City Manager’s Office
City Hall, 170 Santa Maria Ave.

Council meetings:

Agendas are available at the City Council meeting

HOW TO REACH YOUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
• San Mateo County Supervisor Ray Mueller, District 3, 500 County Center, Redwood City CA 94063 (650) 363-4569
• Governor Gavin Newsom, State Capitol Building, Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 445-2841 • State Senator Josh Becker, 1528 So. El Camino Real, Suite 303, San Mateo CA 94402 (650) 212-3313 • Assembly Member Marc Berman, 721 Colorado Ave, Suite 101, Palo Alto CA 94303 (650) 324-0224 • Congressman Sam Liccardo, 1117 Longworth House Office Building, Washington DC 20515 (202) 225-8104
• Senator Alex Padilla, 331 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3553 • Senator Adam Schiff, SD-B40B Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3841 • President Donald J. Trump, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC 20500

CITY COUNCIL
• Mayor Christine Boles, [email protected]
• Vice Mayor Greg Wright, [email protected]
• Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer, [email protected]
• Councilmember Mary Bier, [email protected]
• Councilmember Mayra Espinosa, [email protected]

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
8/24/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Approval of Disbursements for 07/01/26 through 07/31/26 RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Receive and file the Monthly Check Register Report for the month of July 2026.

STAFF CONTACT:

Lucy Xie, Deputy Finance Director
(650) 501-6014
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Staff has submitted the following Monthly Check Register Report per California Government Code, Title 4, Division 3, Part 3, Chapter 3, Section 41004:

Disbursements dated 07/1/26 through 07/31/26 are in the amount of $5,018,606.40 (Attachment 1)
RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Approval of Monthly Check Register Report is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Enhance organizational and fiscal stability: Preparation of the Monthly Check Register Report supports sound financial oversight, transparency, and adherence to adopted fiscal controls.
• Broaden public communications and collaboration: Filing of the Monthly Check Register Report promotes transparency and accountability in City financial operations FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with acceptance of the Monthly Check Register Report.

The report is provided for informational and transparency purposes only and does not authorize any new expenditures or budget appropriations. The disbursements reflected in the report have already been processed in accordance with the City's adopted budget and established financial controls.

ORIGINATED BY:

Finance Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (PDF)
1 Packet Pg. 7
City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 101 10001 FOR: All
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 8367 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001080 ACCESSIBLE SOLUTIONS, LLC 1,100.00 8368 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000058 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES 23,310.00 8369 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000074 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 863.79 8370 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000084 ANTOINETTE M KAUFFMAN 200.00 8371 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001610 ARREGLO CONSTRUCTION INC. 2,500.00 8372 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T OF CALIFORNIA 5,500.00 8373 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001038 BADAWI & ASSOCIATES 30,964.95 8374 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000179 COMMISSION ON TEACHER CRE 100.00 8375 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001561 CAPITAL RIVERS INC 3,500.00 8376 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000193 CELLEBRITE INC. 14,992.44 8377 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001609 CHALLENGE ROOTER 1,279.26 8378 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001564 COASTWEST FIRE PROTECTION 1,170.00 8379 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001119 COLIN DE SOUZA 100.00
8380 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000231 SCA OF CA, LLC 16,692.00 8381 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000232 COOK, MICHAEL G. 1,886.68 8382 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001012 CORE & MAIN LP 4,357.12
8383 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000931 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEME 862.27 8384 07/02/2026 VOID 001368 DAYLIGHT FOODS LLC .00
8385 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001587 MICHAEL MCARDLE 2,388.40 8386 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001493 DISCOUNT PLUMBING & ROOTE 1,200.00 8387 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001559 FUAD YAKUBOV 12,160.00
8388 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001272 GOLDEN BAY ELECTRIC 1,550.00 8389 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000397 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & 1,690.40 8390 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000415 IDEXX LABORATORIES 599.84 8391 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000446 JOHN THE SIGN GUY LLC 186.75 8392 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000448 JOINT VENTURE: SILICON VA 5,000.00 8393 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000469 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES, INC 8,538.78 8394 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001605 LEROHL, KIMBERLY 213.84
8395 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000486 THE LEW EDWARDS GROUP 6,750.00 8396 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000508 SIX FLAGS DISCOVERY KINGD 3,956.88 8397 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000519 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COM 683.71 8398 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000587 OFFICE DEPOT 33.26
8399 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000588 OLIVER PACKAGING AND EQUI 3,295.62 8400 07/02/2026 PRINTED 999998 Mim McNulty 250.00
8401 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001167 PACIFIC BEACH COALITION 1,000.00 8402 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000603 PACIFIC MANOR HARDWARE, I 66.47 8403 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000638 PENINSULA UNIFORMS & EQUI 47.38 8404 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000647 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO 2,400.00 8405 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000692 RICE TRUCKING SOIL FARM 512.41 8406 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001551 ROBERT MILLS 290.80
8407 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001199 SABRINA KRENN 2,000.00
8408 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000021 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLL 8,833.00 8409 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001396 MHC SAN FRANCISCO RV RESO 51,000.00 8410 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000719 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 172.60 8411 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001090 SMART CARE EQUIPMENT SOLU 1,681.55 8412 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000025 SAN MATEO COUNTY MOSQUITO 100.43 8413 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001211 SMELLY MEL'S PLUMBING INC 1,200.00 8414 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000755 SOUTH CITY LUMBER 35.52
8415 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000759 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, INC 18,576.57 8416 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000774 SUSTAINABLE SAN MATEO COU 1,000.00 8417 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000780 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINE 1,770.50 8418 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001021 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 12,500.00

1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements) City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 101 10001 FOR: All
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 8419 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000827 TYLER BUSINESS FORMS 110.40 8420 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000830 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPE 192.01 8421 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000838 UNLIMITED TOOL REPAIR AND 227.94 8422 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000844 US FOODS, INC 4,798.15
8423 07/02/2026 PRINTED 001606 YAKUBOVICH, MARINA 150.23 8424 07/02/2026 PRINTED 000897 SERRA YELLOW CAB 13,551.35 8425 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000039 AVINA, ANGEL 200.00
8426 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000056 ADAM-HILL COMPANY, THE 695.29 8427 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001102 ALBERTSONS / SAFEWAY 1,272.45 8428 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000074 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 850.00 8429 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001615 AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH AS 1,150.00 8430 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T 1,409.67
8431 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T 170.93
8432 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000779 AXON ENTERPRISE INC. 7,795.69 8433 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000779 AXON ENTERPRISE INC. 11,737.14 8434 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000124 BAY POWER LLC GENERATOR S 432.20 8435 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000130 BEARING AGENCIES INC 567.68 8436 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000147 BLUE RIBBON SUPPLY COMPAN 304.10 8437 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000150 BOB GRAF 434.28
8438 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000160 BROADMOOR LANDSCAPE SUPPL 771.10 8439 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001620 JAMES CACCIA PLUMBING 1,200.00 8440 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000213 CLEA 960.00
8441 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000213 CALIFORNIA ASSN OF PROFES 59.00 8442 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000190 CALIFORNIA DIESEL & POWER 1,716.85 8443 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000192 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 17,999.40 8444 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001277 CENTER HARDWARE AND SUPPL 1,445.29 8445 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001069 CINDY BLACKSTONE 94.25
8446 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000203 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 5,540.51 8447 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000011 CITY OF DALY CITY 33,128.41 8448 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000224 COMCAST 370.98
8449 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000224 COMCAST 166.22
8450 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000931 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEME 678.24 8451 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000253 C.W.E.A. 530.00
8452 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000255 DARRYL PANG 400.00
8453 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001601 DIESEL DIRECT WEST LLC 4,281.06 8454 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001601 DIESEL DIRECT WEST LLC 2,749.24 8455 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000281 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 2,980.21 8456 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000293 DUBOCE JANITORIAL SERVICE 1,400.00 8457 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000318 EMCOR SERVICES 1,680.00
8458 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000323 EOA INC 6,574.00
8459 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000346 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1,293.66 8460 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000347 GOVERNANCE SCIENCES GROUP 6,900.00 8461 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000350 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 14,561.60 8462 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000116 BADGE FRAME, INC. 39.00
8463 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000013 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 8464 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000013 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 200.00 8465 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000013 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 8466 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000371 GOLDEN STATE LUMBER 592.07 8467 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000373 THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBE 3,417.52 8468 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001129 GOVERNMENT FINANCE SERVIC 2,112.50 8469 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000377 GRAINGER 14,164.57
8470 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001614 GRANICUS LLC 30,515.49

1.a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements) City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 101 10001 FOR: All
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 8471 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000380 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY #265 1,851.93 8472 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001570 CHRISENTIA PIZZO 2,048.13 8473 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000390 HACH COMPANY 405.66
8474 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001608 HARGENS INC 270.89
8475 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000955 HD SUPPLY FORMERLY HOME D 318.32 8476 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000955 HD SUPPLY FORMERLY HOME D 106.47 8477 07/10/2026 VOID 000397 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & .00 8478 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001556 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 645.95 8479 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000404 HIP HOUSING, INC. 1,000.00 8480 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000406 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 3,287.93 8481 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000415 IDEXX LABORATORIES 707.54 8482 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001213 JESSICA DAMMEYER 99.33
8483 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001293 JESUS ARANDA 678.00
8484 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000455 KASEYA US LLC 195.70
8485 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000457 KBA DOCUSYS 81.66
8486 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000979 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 1,671.18 8487 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000460 KENT CLEANERS 161.26
8488 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000468 KONE, INC. 2,389.70
8489 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000469 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES, INC 22,250.23 8490 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000474 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERI 176.40 8491 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000519 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COM 5,978.25 8492 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000520 MCMILLAN ELECTRIC 956.00 8493 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000522 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIO 3,870.89 8494 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001027 MICHAEL TREVIZO 50.00
8495 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000531 EMD MILLIPORE CORPORATION 1,175.42 8496 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000536 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQU 96.55 8497 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000015 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER 18,913.28 8498 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000592 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 637.24 8499 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000587 OFFICE DEPOT 1,726.66
8500 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000602 OMMM PACIFICA 4,870.66
8501 07/10/2026 PRINTED 999998 Rubi Sugia 500.00
8502 07/10/2026 PRINTED 999998 George Salet 2,000.00
8503 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000590 OPENGOV, INC. 17,972.34
8504 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000603 PACIFIC MANOR HARDWARE, I 59.57 8505 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000612 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS UNI 708.13 8506 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000612 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF Loc 1,579.83 8507 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000612 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF L24 77.70 8508 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001372 PAGEFREEZER SOFTWARE INC. 6,029.28 8509 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000638 PENINSULA UNIFORMS & EQUI 994.26 8510 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000647 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO 1,424.42 8511 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000617 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS 210.00 8512 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000616 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS 840.00 8513 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000620 PACIFICA POLICE SUPERVISO 420.00 8514 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000679 QUILL CORPORATION 525.37 8515 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000679 QUILL CORPORATION 184.33 8516 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000679 QUILL CORPORATION 30.47
8517 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000679 QUILL CORPORATION 64.36
8518 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000685 RCM FIRE PROTECTION INC 225.00 8519 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001509 RECOLOGY OF THE COAST 1,311.88 8520 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001500 REDWOOD ENGINEERING CONST 103,319.63 8521 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000690 REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVI 3,022.10 8522 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000692 RICE TRUCKING SOIL FARM 1,021.35

1.a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements) City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 101 10001 FOR: All
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 8523 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001613 ROSENBERG PLUMBING 1,200.00 8524 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001199 SABRINA KRENN 31.90
8525 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001553 SALLY SWANSON 21,718.50
8526 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001336 CITY OF SAN MATEO 100.00 8527 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000021 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF' 6,717.25 8528 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000729 SEAVIEW TIRE & BRAKE CENT 717.23 8529 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000731 SERVICE PRESS, INC. 232.44 8530 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000719 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 4,115.90 8531 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000759 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, INC 3,692.22 8532 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000029 SWRCB 5,525.00
8533 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000769 STEWART CHEVROLET 2,652.30 8534 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000772 SUN RIDGE SYSTEMS, INC 4,135.75 8535 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001136 SUZANNE CUNANAN 50.00
8536 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000805 T-MOBILE CORPORATION 506.07 8537 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000778 TRAFFIC AND PARKING CONTR 280.30 8538 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000791 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTE 215.00 8539 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000802 THOMSON REUTERS WEST 476.28 8540 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001021 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 10,000.00 8541 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000817 TREE MANAGEMENT EXPERTS 3,750.20 8542 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000823 TECHNICAL SAFETY SERVICES 1,287.00 8543 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001621 U-ROCK UTILITY EQUIPMENT 9,088.71 8544 07/10/2026 PRINTED 001507 U.S BANK 3,700.00
8545 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000828 U.S. BANK EQUIPMENT FINAN 2,407.37 8546 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000829 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVIC 4,316.77 8547 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000832 UNDERWOOD, EILEEN 67.43
8548 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000837 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC 2,021.70 8549 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000855 VERIZON WIRELESS 322.48
8550 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000863 CALTEST ANALYTICAL LAB 106.00 8551 07/10/2026 PRINTED 000897 SERRA YELLOW CAB 7,240.37 8552 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000074 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 900.40 8553 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000074 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 293.34 8554 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000078 AMERICAN DEBRIS BOX SERVI 358.99 8555 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001490 ANEL MEYER 725.55
8556 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000089 ONE WATER LLC 2,952.00
8557 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000094 ASCAP 464.50
8558 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 10,370.28 8559 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T 186.58
8560 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000779 AXON ENTERPRISE INC. 11,572.32 8561 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000110 BAAQMD 32,325.00
8562 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000130 BEARING AGENCIES INC 722.78 8563 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001595 BOGDANOV LLC 10,000.00
8564 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000178 NAF SERVICES, INC. 1,933.80 8565 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000187 CAROLLO 3,577.50
8566 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000190 CALIFORNIA DIESEL & POWER 1,429.48 8567 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000192 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 13,345.24 8568 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000201 CHILDCARE CAREERS 6,255.34 8569 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000203 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 2,264.52 8570 07/17/2026 VOID 000203 CINTAS .00
8571 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001012 CORE & MAIN LP 987.56
8572 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000248 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 1,485.80 8573 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000253 C.W.E.A. 2,364.00
8574 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001368 DAYLIGHT FOODS LLC 251.10

1.a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements) City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 101 10001 FOR: All
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 8575 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001587 MICHAEL MCARDLE 2,655.80 8576 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001601 DIESEL DIRECT WEST LLC 7,211.09 8577 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000292 DU-ALL SAFETY, LLC 2,150.00 8578 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000318 EMCOR SERVICES 1,680.00
8579 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000320 ENID ANSGARIUS 232.00
8580 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000332 EXPERIAN 100.00
8581 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000335 FASTRAK INVOICE PROCESSIN 8.50 8582 07/17/2026 VOID 001041 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 200.66 8583 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001041 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 1,078.41 8584 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001380 FIRST STUDENT, INC. 4,058.24 8585 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001423 FLEETROCK, LLC 721.50
8586 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000371 GOLDEN STATE LUMBER 709.95 8587 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000377 GRAINGER 1,480.76
8588 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000380 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY #265 3,174.03 8589 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000381 GREASE TRAP CLEANERS, LLC 100.00 8590 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000397 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & 2,390.00 8591 07/17/2026 VOID 000943 HELLA THREADS, LLC 1,015.00 8592 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000399 HERC RENTALS INC. 10,744.46 8593 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000401 HILL SCOTT 55.00
8594 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000415 IDEXX LABORATORIES 1,012.31 8595 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001213 JESSICA DAMMEYER 98.00
8596 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000443 JOAN ARTHUR 235.63
8597 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000446 JOHN THE SIGN GUY LLC 494.44 8598 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000462 KIMBALL MIDWEST 805.21
8599 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000468 KONE, INC. 245.00
8600 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000469 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES, INC 3,478.80 8601 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000486 THE LEW EDWARDS GROUP 6,750.00 8602 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001025 MATT KELLY 185.50
8603 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000519 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COM 567.51 8604 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000531 EMD MILLIPORE CORPORATION 12,112.91 8605 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000549 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICE 1,150.00 8606 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000551 MUSCIO SECURITY 105.00
8607 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000561 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINE 1,547.50 8608 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001397 NICK SAKKOS 16,500.00
8609 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000592 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 1,356.65 8610 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001365 CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF C 3,795.00 8611 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000587 OFFICE DEPOT 1,033.02
8612 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000588 OLIVER PACKAGING AND EQUI 465.77 8613 07/17/2026 PRINTED 999997 Ed Vigil 16.68
8614 07/17/2026 PRINTED 999998 Mona Urbina 84.83
8615 07/17/2026 PRINTED 999998 Rubi Sugia 613.00
8616 07/17/2026 PRINTED 999998 Ronald Ragland 2,000.00
8617 07/17/2026 PRINTED 999998 Susan Leong 2,000.00
8618 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001619 PACIFIC BAY EQUIPMENT 12,826.57 8619 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000603 PACIFIC MANOR HARDWARE, I 180.06 8620 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000985 PAPE MACHINERY 140.94
8621 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001628 PDB INC 2,500.00
8622 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000642 PET FOOD EXPRESS 282.32
8623 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000644 PETERSON 10,439.12
8624 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000972 PLAN JPA 2,381,847.94
8625 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001629 PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERG 2,500.00 8626 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000679 QUILL CORPORATION 1,231.12

1.a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements) City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 101 10001 FOR: All
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 8627 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000679 QUILL CORPORATION 92.79
8628 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000679 QUILL CORPORATION 42.29
8629 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000681 R & S ERECTION NORTH PENI 755.40 8630 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001392 RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHIN 1,700.00 8631 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000690 REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVI 2,960.50 8632 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000692 RICE TRUCKING SOIL FARM 549.47 8633 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001336 CITY OF SAN MATEO 50.00
8634 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000021 SAN MATEO COUNTY PUBLIC S 3,787.50 8635 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000717 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 720.00 8636 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001024 SCHAAF & WHEELER 3,545.00 8637 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001172 SEMITORR GROUP, LLC 5,963.10 8638 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000755 SOUTH CITY LUMBER 48.19
8639 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000027 STATE LANDS COMMISSION 1,067.39 8640 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000004 CALIFORNIA STATE OF JUSTI 192.00 8641 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000780 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINE 1,770.50 8642 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000807 TOM'S AUTO BODY & PAINT 250.00 8643 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001021 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2,500.00 8644 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000827 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 666.00 8645 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000828 U.S. BANK EQUIPMENT FINAN 1,879.88 8646 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000829 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVIC 386.95 8647 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000830 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPE 1,908.12 8648 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000834 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AME 538.08 8649 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000837 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC 5,625.89 8650 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000844 US FOODS, INC 2,169.49
8651 07/17/2026 PRINTED 000855 VERIZON WIRELESS 3,465.69 8652 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001631 WALLACE, TYLER 259.00
8653 07/17/2026 PRINTED 001488 MICHAEL ZACHARY HARRIS 204.14 8654 07/20/2026 PRINTED 001634 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMISS 1,626.00 8655 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000039 AVINA, ANGEL 2,100.00
8656 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001623 ACME PACIFIC REPAIRS, INC 375.00 8657 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000052 ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFFS O 2,268.00 8658 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000058 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES 19,277.44 8659 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001342 ALAN DONG 57.72
8660 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001102 ALBERTSONS / SAFEWAY 623.06 8661 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000062 ALERT PEST CONTROL COMPAN 155.00 8662 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000074 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 881.24 8663 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001247 ANA CORREA 57.72
8664 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001341 ANGEL CASTRO 57.72
8665 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T 141.87
8666 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000779 AXON ENTERPRISE INC. 12,391.41 8667 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000913 BENEFIT COORDINATORS CORP 12,043.30 8668 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000137 BCC BENEFIT COORDINATORS 15,485.85 8669 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000137 BCC BENEFIT COORDINATORS 2,809.71 8670 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000147 BLUE RIBBON SUPPLY COMPAN 1,707.49 8671 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001373 BLUE TRITON BRANDS INC 41.07 8672 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001411 CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS 2,300.00 8673 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000178 NAF SERVICES, INC. 1,230.60 8674 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000007 CCAG - CITY OF SAN CARLOS 128,879.00 8675 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000201 CHILDCARE CAREERS 960.00 8676 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000011 CITY OF DALY CITY 358.85 8677 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000012 CITY OF FOSTER CITY 4,078.00 8678 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000247 CRYSTAL CLEAR CLEANING CO 1,400.00

1.a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements) City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 101 10001 FOR: All
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 8679 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000248 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 262.50 8680 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001587 MICHAEL MCARDLE 1,766.80 8681 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001601 DIESEL DIRECT WEST LLC 4,837.95 8682 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000282 DISH 68.01
8683 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000306 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION 168.00 8684 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000013 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 8685 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000013 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 200.00 8686 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000013 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 8687 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001556 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 4,004.27 8688 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001636 J. HIGGINS, LTD 4,323.53 8689 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000446 JOHN THE SIGN GUY LLC 5,042.58 8690 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001630 KINETIC KIDS LLC - ERIC T 1,603.70 8691 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000468 KONE, INC. 29,563.20
8692 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001028 MATT LUJAN 57.72
8693 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000524 MICHAEL ROBERTS CONSTRUCT 228,494.46 8694 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000548 MSI FUEL MANAGEMENT INC 6,546.00 8695 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000015 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER 18,154.58 8696 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000582 NPFBA 423.00
8697 07/24/2026 PRINTED 999997 Laurie Ross 229.00
8698 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000605 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 10,111.42 8699 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000612 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS-LTD 370.50 8700 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000612 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS UNI 708.13 8701 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000612 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF Loc 1,579.83 8702 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000612 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF L24 77.70 8703 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000617 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS 210.00 8704 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000616 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS 840.00 8705 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000620 PACIFICA POLICE SUPERVISO 420.00 8706 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000679 QUILL CORPORATION 21.63
8707 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001637 RM BUILDERS ASSOCIATES, I 1,000.00 8708 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000728 SEAN'S QUALITY FLOORS 16,350.00 8709 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000731 SERVICE PRESS, INC. 79.03 8710 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000025 SAN MATEO COUNTY MOSQUITO 100.43 8711 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000936 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCIS 4,290.00 8712 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000004 CALIFORNIA STATE OF JUSTI 2,176.00 8713 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000781 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #350 990.00 8714 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000782 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #856 2,709.00 8715 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000782 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #856 2,709.00 8716 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001594 TOLBERT, LANEA 89.54
8717 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001140 TRAVIS MEYERHOFF 57.72
8718 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001291 TSI INCORPORATED 991.31
8719 07/24/2026 VOID 000030 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE .00
8720 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000829 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVIC 3,232.32 8721 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000830 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPE 23,743.12 8722 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000844 US FOODS, INC 4,560.83
8723 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000855 VERIZON WIRELESS 2,724.94 8724 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000855 VERIZON WIRELESS 2,692.88 8725 07/24/2026 PRINTED 000878 THE UPS STORE 0996 135.00 8726 07/24/2026 PRINTED 001349 WILLIAM SMITH 12.50
8727 07/27/2026 VOID 000030 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 3,600.00 8728 07/30/2026 PRINTED 001603 SAN MATEO COUNTY SILICON 156,897.22 8729 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001101 A BETTER GARAGE DOOR 52,544.42 8730 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000041 A-1 RHINO LININGS 2,075.00

1.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements) City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 101 10001 FOR: All
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 8731 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000052 ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFFS O 324.00 8732 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000053 ACTION ROAD SOLUTIONS LLC 698.50 8733 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000056 ADAM-HILL COMPANY, THE 1,337.70 8734 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000074 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 2,333.23 8735 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000078 AMERICAN DEBRIS BOX SERVI 532.99 8736 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001641 ANDREW BUCKMAN 225.00
8737 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000084 ANTOINETTE M KAUFFMAN 100.00 8738 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000089 ONE WATER LLC 2,952.00
8739 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T 1,268.55
8740 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T 156.45
8741 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T 518.56
8742 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T 611.37
8743 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000096 AT&T 171.54
8744 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000098 ATLAS PLUMBING & ROOTER I 3,700.00 8745 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000108 VWR INTERNATIONAL 1,229.54 8746 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000779 AXON ENTERPRISE INC. 8,819.54 8747 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000110 BAAQMD 351.00
8748 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000114 BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES 15,225.00 8749 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000130 BEARING AGENCIES INC 2,558.28 8750 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000166 BURKE WILLIAMS AND SORENS 346,222.08 8751 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000192 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 3,731.11 8752 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001424 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPO 7,863.20 8753 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000203 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 3,557.16 8754 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000203 CINTAS 190.40
8755 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000224 COMCAST 206.66
8756 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000224 COMCAST 83.11
8757 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000248 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 10,842.50 8758 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000253 C.W.E.A. 538.00
8759 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001368 DAYLIGHT FOODS LLC 388.80 8760 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001587 MICHAEL MCARDLE 749.70
8761 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001601 DIESEL DIRECT WEST LLC 16,116.68 8762 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000280 DISCOUNT PLUMBING, INC. 14,800.00 8763 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001324 ELIZABETH SOLIS 178.59
8764 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001174 ENERGEN SYSTEM, INC 10,122.17 8765 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000335 FASTRAK VIOLATION PROCESS 49.25 8766 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000335 FASTRAK INVOICE PROCESSIN 17.00 8767 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000339 FEDEX 33.30
8768 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001041 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 4,085.09 8769 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001130 FISHER ROSEMOUNT SYSTEM I 7,137.37 8770 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000346 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 712.00 8771 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000350 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 87.41 8772 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000355 FREYER & LAURETA, INC. 37,288.20 8773 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000363 GHD INC. 3,940.00
8774 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000377 GRAINGER 4,422.24
8775 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000380 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY #265 1,560.21 8776 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000390 HACH COMPANY 1,002.19
8777 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000398 HDL SOFTWARE, LLC 22,265.90 8778 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001523 HEIDI NG 79.49
8779 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000402 HILTON IRENE 1,090.60
8780 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000430 IPS GROUP INC. 1,426.64
8781 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001384 IVETTE SINGH 94.79
8782 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000434 JAMES FORD, INC. 197.95

1.a
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements) City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 101 10001 FOR: All
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 8783 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000446 JOHN THE SIGN GUY LLC 878.53 8784 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000462 KIMBALL MIDWEST 150.79
8785 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001633 MAINTAINX,INC 6,141.00
8786 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000515 MAXX METALS 3,652.62
8787 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000519 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COM 4,076.42 8788 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001569 MIKE MOLINA 619.25
8789 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000536 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQU 386.98 8790 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000015 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER 20,361.44 8791 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000561 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINE 2,341.75 8792 07/31/2026 PRINTED 999998 Jose Gallardo 500.00
8793 07/31/2026 PRINTED 999998 George V Salet, Jr. 1,200.00 8794 07/31/2026 PRINTED 999998 Lillian Chu 1,200.00
8795 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001628 PDB INC 1,500.00
8796 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000647 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO 10,756.00 8797 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001604 PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE 70,000.00 8798 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000674 PUMP REPAIR SERVICE CO., 40,856.03 8799 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000679 QUILL CORPORATION 267.34 8800 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001644 REY SORIANO 1,850.00
8801 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000021 SAN MATEO COUNTY PLANNING 1,500.00 8802 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000021 SAN MATEO COUNTY INFORMAT 164.51 8803 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001635 SF WINDOW AND DOOR, INC 2,142.56 8804 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000759 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, INC 23,570.00 8805 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000776 SYNAGRO WEST, LLC 23,663.84 8806 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000787 TELEDYNE INSTRUMENTS, INC 743.85 8807 07/31/2026 PRINTED 000791 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTE 740.63 8808 07/31/2026 PRINTED 001545 VALERIE H. KNIGHT 1,920.00 442 CHECKS CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL 5,018,606.40 .00

1.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements) City of Pacifica

AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 08/18/2026 12:18
User: 5234lxie
Program ID: apchkrcn

UNCLEARED CLEARED
442 CHECKS FINAL TOTAL 5,018,606.40 .00
** END OF REPORT - Generated by Lucy Xie **

1.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report July 2026 (6274 : Disbursements)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
8/24/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to approve the minutes for the May 11, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting and the May 26, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting.

STAFF CONTACT:

Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Move to approve the minutes for the May 11, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting (Attachment A) and the May 26, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting (Attachment B).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Within budgeted operational expenses.

ORIGINATED BY:

City Clerk
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (PDF) Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (PDF) 2 Packet Pg. 18

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Christine Boles
Vice Mayor Greg Wright
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Mayra Espinosa
City Council Regular Meeting 1 May 11, 2026
May 11, 2026 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Christine Boles called the meeting to order on May 11, 2026 at 6:04 PM 6:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Boles called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. She welcomed new City Manager Sean Charpentier to his first City Council meeting.

City Manager Charpentier thanked Mayor Boles for the warm welcome. He stated that he is happy to be here and in the service of Pacifica City Council and serving the community.

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Christine Boles Mayor Present
Greg Wright Vice Mayor Present
Sue Beckmeyer Councilmember Present
Mary Bier Councilmember Present
Mayra Espinosa Councilmember Present
City Clerk Coffey took a verbal roll call.

Staff Present: Sean Charpentier, City Manager; Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney; Yulia Carter, Asst. City Manager; Scott Leslie, PB&R Director; Melissa Tigbao, PW Director; Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director; Marisol Gómez, Finance & Administrative Services Director; Gretchen Heckman, Economic & Housing Development Manager; Lucy Xie, Dep. Finance Director; Roland Yip, PW Dep. Director-Engineering; Desmond Barca, Acting PW Dep. Director (Wastewater); Daniel Patten, Wastewater Engineering Manager; Vince Romero, Police Captain; Nick Doyle, Battalion Chief (NCFA); Stephanie Coy, Financial Analyst; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk; Emily La, Dep. City Clerk.

Reading of Land Acknowledgment
Mayor Boles read the Land Acknowledgment
Salute to the Flag led by Councilmember Espinosa

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

2.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 2 May 11, 2026
A. Special Presentation - Peninsula Clean Energy
Mayor Boles invited CEO of Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), Shawn Marshall, to the podium for a special presentation.

CEO Marshall stated she is providing both an update on Peninsula Clean Energy’s various activities as they celebrate a decade of service and to support an item on the consent agenda related to JPA amendment changing their name. She briefly described their purpose regarding providing clean power resources, working with PG&E, etc. She then stated that their Board decided to change their name from Peninsula Clean Energy to WestLight Energy, explained their reasons, and stated that they are asking the City to approve the JPA amendment. They are having some great events to mark their ten years of service. She thanked them for all their support and recognized Mayor Boles for her great leadership on their Board of Directors.

Mayor Boles thanked her for all that information. She asked Council for comments or questions.

Vice Mayor Wright thought he heard her say that they deliver cleaner energy cheaper and asked if people can sign up with them.

CEO Marshall stated that customers are automatically enrolled with the option to opt out and stay with PG&E for bundled service if they choose to do that.

Vice Mayor Wright asked about a loan product for electrical upgrades.

CEO Marshall stated that they can go to their website and search for zero percent loans and a page will come up that is available to all customers. It has to be used for electrification and sustainability and it is repaid over five years on their PG&E bill.

Vice Mayor Wright asked about special rates for solar panels.

CEO Marshall stated that program will be up later this year. It is a reboot of a program they had and it will also be on their website.

Vice Mayor Wright thanked her for all the great work they do in our community.

Councilmember Espinosa asked about energy-efficient equipment outside of electrical panels on solar panels, such as heater, stoves, furnace, etc.

CEO Marshall stated that customers are welcome to use whatever solar product they want to use. In the program they are rolling out later this year for solar and batteries, customers choose their own products and work with a third-party provider if they want to finance it under preferred rates. She stated that PCE is providing some of the credit backing for that so they can access special terms. She referred to the loan application and stated to indicate that it would be used to swap out old appliances for more efficient, cleaner appliances, and you have to provide proof of that. Other than that, it is not difficult to get access to that loan.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if solar is only rooftop or if they also help with ground mount systems.

CEO Marshall stated, for residents, she is sure they will do ground mount. For the cities, when they have been putting in solar on rooftops at recreation centers and police stations, those have both been ground mount parking lot structures as well as rooftop.

2.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 3 May 11, 2026
Mayor Boles stated it is a pleasure to serve on their Board to know what a big difference they are making, reducing electrical rates for our residents and businesses and reducing our greenhouse gases. It is fun to see all these technical contracts that PCE, soon to be WestLight Energy, is purchasing for power and being forward thinking. She felt they were a great resource.

There were no public comments.

B. Proclamation: Wildfire Preparedness Month - May 2026 Mayor Boles stated Vice Mayor Wright will read the proclamation for Wildfire Preparedness Month.

Vice Mayor Wright read the proclamation.

Battalion Chief Nick Doyle was present to receive the proclamation.

There were no public comments.

C. Proclamation: Emergency Medical Services Week (May 17 - 23, 2026) Mayor Boles read the proclamation for Emergency Medical Services Week.

Battalion Chief Doyle stated he is here on behalf of EMS Chief Matt Powers. He thanked Council for the two proclamations and recognizing the dedication of EMS responders. This week is an opportunity to acknowledge all the various responders who answer the call 24/7; their commitment, compassion and professionalism make a difference during difficult moments in people’s lives. EMS is a team effort and proud to stand alongside healthcare partners, etc., in providing high quality care. He thanked them for the proclamation and support of Emergency Medical Services.

Councilmember Beckmeyer thanked them for all they do. She stated that they often hear when they are responding because of the sirens, and they see them in highways and neighborhoods, and she has been observant of so many calls for service at senior living areas. They also make Pacifica safer and healthier for people to age in place, and as an age-friendly city improving when we can, she is grateful for their services, especially in light of a personal event.

Battalion Chief Doyle added that they have dedicated professional firefighters and they strive to give the best service to all the citizens and was glad she was taken care of.

Councilmember Bier could not thank them enough, adding that she is sure they have all had some kind of experience to help them or their neighbors, schools, families, etc.

Vice Mayor Wright stated they are always there for us 24/7 and he sleeps so much better at night knowing they are there. He thanked them for all they do to make us all safer and better.

Councilmember Espinosa shared an anecdote and appreciated their services, and she thanked him for what they are doing.

Battalion Chief Doyle appreciated the kind words. He stated they are happy to be in the community and give back as much as they can.

2.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 4 May 11, 2026
Mayor Boles shared a personal anecdote about her and her mother and appreciated that they were not just taking care of her but giving them advice about the kind of care she needed. She described their education efforts to the community to clear space around our homes and doing what we can to prevent fires from starting and spreading.

There were no public comments.

D. Proclamation: National Public Works Week (May 17 - 23, 2026) Councilmember Beckmeyer read the proclamation for National Public Works Week.

PW Director Tigbao stated, on behalf of Public Works, they thank Council for passing this proclamation and recognizing our PW team as they approach National Public Works Week (May 17-23). She is accompanied by some PW staff who keep our community running every day.

She stated the past year is extra special due to several awards received by the State and regional organizations. They invited Council and the public to their Public Works Open House on Wednesday, May 20, from 9:00 a.m., to 11:30 a.m. at their corporation yard at 151 Milagra Drive.

Councilmember Bier stated that our city could not run without Public Works and she wanted her to know how much we appreciate Public Works.

Vice Mayor Wright emphasized the presence of Public Works in our lives, from routine sewer needs to emergency or late night calls to the sea wall. People do not know about those calls in the middle of the night and take them for granted. So many of those things are what PW does with a smile on their face and the culture they have created in their department and how they work together is amazing. He thanks them for doing that for all of us.

Councilmember Espinosa thanked them for keeping the city running, even though most people do not see what they do every day. They appreciate them so much.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated it is her hope and goal to get more Public Works staff. She appreciates the camaraderie and willingness to jump in and help, even when it is not necessarily their area. When the mission is critical, it is everybody’s area and she has been on Beach Boulevard in the rain and it is amazing to see what they do and how pleasant they are in the way they do it. She thanked them.

Mayor Boles stated congratulations for the work at our Wastewater Treatment Plant. She knows it won awards when it was first built. Some people might not know that it is a really special system with an ultraviolet disinfection and we won awards again over 20 years later for the continued operation. They not only keep us running but thinking steps ahead to make sure that we stay running and we appreciate what all of Public Works and staff do.

There were no public comments.

E. Proclamation: Small Business Month - May 2026
Councilmember Bier read the proclamation for Small Business Month.

2.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 5 May 11, 2026
Economic & Housing Development Manager Heckman stated that Pacifica businesses do more than sell products and provide services; they represent hard working families and neighbors that make up Pacifica. Small business owners are tireless, showing up early and stay late. Their storefronts are not just a place of business, but are gathering spaces where new connections are made and old ones are strengthened. They provide familiarity and stability for us all. They kept their doors open through a pandemic, economic uncertainty and through their own life challenges. She acknowledged the regional recognition of one or our homegrown businesses, Breakers, in Rockaway. Just last week, our Region Small Business Administration, a division of the Federal Agency that exists to understand small business success, recently named Steve and Robby Bankroft of Breakers the Regional 2026 Small Business Persons of the Year. She then passed on to small business representatives to say a few words about their businesses, starting with Beth Lemke, owner of Grape in the Fog in Rockaway, and Tyler Martinez, friend and facilities manager of Pacifica Thai Cuisine in Sharp Park.

Ms. Lemke stated she owns Grape in the Fog and are celebrating 16 years. Since 2010, they have been part of so many milestones, births, deaths, marriages, divorces, people moving to and away from Pacifica, etc. During the pandemic years, they discovered how committed the greater Pacifica community is to supporting local businesses. She is seeing new businesses foregoing brick and mortar all together and instead participating in pop-up events. She stated time will tell if this is a win-win for traditional brick and mortar. The years since the pandemic have been difficult for the wine bar and they are not out of the dark. She is proud of what she created with her staff and loyal customers. When she was opening the bar, she took advantage of all the help she could get. After 16 years, you would think she is a pro at running her business and the reality is that nothing prepares you for owning a business in a coastal bedroom community. She referred to an article about them in this month’s Coastside Magazine.

Mr. Martinez stated that Pacifica Thai Cuisine has been a staple in our community for over 38 years. He stated that Joy and Tom Hlawphakdi founded it in 1989 to follow their dreams of serving fresh and culturally accurate and original food from their homeland to Pacificans and the Bay Area. They are heartbroken about Tom passing away but will continue to carry on his legacy and have plans to keep the restaurant operating into the future. It has always been a family-owned and operated business offering a warm, friendly and inclusive environment for all to enjoy and mentioned their open hours and their various menu options. He stated that they cannot thank Pacificans enough for their support over the years and they are forever grateful.

Mayor Boles opened public comments.

Jennifer Christainsen, Pacifica, is the owner of Art Space on the Coast, a pottery studio in downtown Pacifica. She thanked Council for the Small Business Week proclamation as it means a lot for small business owners to be recognized this way every year. She stated in April, WalletHub published a ranking naming Pacifica as the worst city in the country to start a small business. What happened next is over 30 businesses have signed up together for what they are calling Project 1334, and they are each creating a special item for sale, priced at $13.34, turning the ranking into a symbol of where they are in the community. She believes this project has the potential to help Pacifica earn different national attention, not as the worst place to do business but a city where small businesses do not give up, neighbors rally together and the community can write its own story.

Robby Bancroft, Pacifica, stated that he accepted the proclamation last year. He wanted to thank everyone, and he welcomed E&HD Manager Heckman. He gave a shout out to his dad and staff at Breakers and the Shore Shack. He wanted to also honor May as Mental Health

2.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 6 May 11, 2026
Awareness Month as well as National Small Business Burger Month. He thanked everyone for all the support.

Ed Ochi, Pacifica, stated he is speaking for himself as a Pacifica resident. He shared his positive thoughts on the importance of small businesses, which differentiates Pacifica as a town, not a suburb, and his pride for involvement with Project 1334.

Mayor Boles closed public comments.

Councilmember Bier wanted to honor Tom and stated he will be missed. She thanked Mr.

Martinez for being here and showing his pictures.

Councilmember Espinosa stated she went for dinner to Pacifica Thai Cuisine in the past week and highlighted the owner’s generosity and friendliness.

Councilmember Bier expressed her frustrations with the article and stated there is no ranking or article that will show the heart of our city, as the heart is in the relationships we build with each other and how we support each other’s businesses, families, adventures, etc. She agreed that it is hard to run a business anywhere, including here, but when we keep our relationships together, we nourish them and shop at all our shops, talk to small business owners, and become friends. She appreciated the Project 1334 initiative.

Vice Mayor Wright expressed his frustrations with the article and shared his appreciation of local business owners as well as Economic & Housing Development Manager Heckman.

Councilmember Espinosa reiterated that Pacifica is the city where small businesses do not give up and encouraged everyone to support them.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated the article did not know how this community came together during the pandemic and how we produced a lift for our businesses and how we survived together. She thanked the fortitude of local business owners for keeping our city a town and not a suburb.

Mayor Boles wanted to give a special shoutout to Robby Bancroft. He is not only promoting his business but every other business in our city overall. She stated he should celebrate the award they received as he and his dad are the small business persons of the year, regionally. She stated it is exciting to see a business open and thrive. She loved the collective creativity in Project 1334 and thanked them for leading us forward, and we are proud and grateful for each one of them and the hard work it is to open their business doors every single day.

CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no public comments.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
SECONDER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa

1. Approval of Disbursements for 4/1/26 through 4/30/26

2.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 7 May 11, 2026
PROPOSED ACTION: Receive and file the Monthly Check Register Report for the month of April 2026.

2. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes for the February 23, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting.

3. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the End of Beach Boulevard
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

4. Continuation of Proclamation of a Local Emergency at the Sewer Mains Crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar Neighborhood
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist at the Sewer Mains Crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar Neighborhood.

5. Fourth Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement which amends the name of Peninsula Clean Energy Authority to WestLight Energy, the new agency name approved by the Peninsula Clean Energy Authority Board of Directors on October 23, 2025.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution approving the Fourth Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement which amends the name of Peninsula Clean Energy Authority to WestLight, Energy the new agency name approved by the Peninsula Clean Energy Authority Board of Directors on October 23, 2025.

6. Quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ending March 31, 2026 PROPOSED ACTION: Review and accept the Quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ending March 31, 2026.

7. Adopt a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2026-27 funded by SB 1: Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Adopting a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2026-27 funded by SB 1: Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

8. Approval of Consultant Services Agreement with BKF Engineers for Feasibility Study Services for the Oceana Bike Lanes Project
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution Approving the Consultant Services Agreement with BKF Engineers for feasibility study services for the Oceana Bike Lanes Project in the amount of $91,446 and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related to the project.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
Jenna Duca and Jeri Duca, Pacifica, stated they are from Ingrid B. Lacy Middle School and are here to talk about climate change, decreasing sea levels, rising water shortages, increasing wildfires, and bad air quality. They emphasized the need for a new path to renewal energy.

2.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 8 May 11, 2026
Joaquin Jiminez, Half Moon Bay, stated he is one of the candidates for County Supervisor for District 3 and shared details about his campaigning in Pacifica, especially visiting the local businesses. He also shared what he supports now and his goals if elected.

Anita Rees, Pacifica Resource Center, shared updates on opening hours, grocery distributions, the Volunteer Appreciation Lunch, and Palm-a-Palooza. She also shared information from Unhoused on the Coast outreach team and data on encampments in Pacifica.

PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.

CONSIDERATION

9. Presentation from San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) regarding SB 63 (Connect Bay Area Act) and the Local Investment Plan.

PROPOSED ACTION: Receive a presentation from San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) regarding SB 63 (Connect Bay Area Act) and the Local Investment Plan and provide further direction to staff, as desired.

SamTrans Government & Community Affairs Director Jessica Epstein presented the staff report.

City Manager Charpentier shared the following additional information for reference: In the General Plan, there was very strong policy guidance for advocating for SamTrans and other public transit providers to improve transit service and facilities, enable trips to be made without use of a car and advocate for the expansion of public transit services and facilities to improve public access and recreation opportunities along the coast. He also shared the data for how Pacificans get to work: approximately 62% drive alone; approximately 7% carpool compared to 10% for the County; 24% work from home versus 17% for the County; and, for public transportation, about 4% commute from Pacifica versus 6% for the County. Furthermore, Pacifica has the lowest pavement index in the County and one of the lower ones in the Bay Area. Lastly, he added that we are at 9.85% sales tax. Within that, there are six local sales taxes: our Measure Y, County Measure K and the transportation Measure A and W as well as Measure RR for Caltrain which is one-quarter of a cent, and SamTrans has a half-cent as well.

Vice Mayor Wright asked what percent does the City collect in sales tax.

City Manager Charpentier stated usually it is one cent. He stated that there are two components: a base of state sales tax of 7.25% and a share of the sales tax the City gets from the state portion (Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law). He believes it is the 1% but also the half-cent Measure Y.

Finance & Administrative Services Director Gómez stated State, County and other agencies make up about 8.375% of our 9.875% so Pacifica’s total with the Bradley Burns and Measure Y is 1.5%.

City Manager Charpentier concluded Measure Y is 0.5% and Bradley Burns 1%.

Vice Mayor Wright asked what return to source in SamTrans vision look like, i.e. $50 million coming back to the municipalities in terms of additional new services or investments.

Director Epstein stated that is the process they are going through now, i.e., getting feedback to figure out what it would look like. She stated some would be reserved for the operational deficit.

2.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 9 May 11, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright stated that is outside of the return to source fund. He stated that they have additional funding, not just the return to source funds.

Director Epstein stated that would be within the return to source funds. There are specific categories within SB63 that fund Caltrain, BART, AC transit, other agencies, and SamTrans does not have one of those categories. They are the administrator of the funding that would come back to the County. This measure is about preservation of service. There is money for pavement in this, but it is very constrained in that it can only go to streets that have fixed route bus service. She encourages them to look at the May Board meeting as that is where they did a first round of how it could look at a high level. That will function in the way that the SamTrans Board normally does where projects come before them and allocates budget toward that, but these funds would be guided by a framework for the SB63 specific return to source fund.

Vice Mayor Wright asked, in terms of their public outreach, of the 1800 responses what percentage is that of San Mateo County.

Director Epstein stated this is not a professional poll, not statistically significant, and is an opt in survey that is a small fraction of San Mateo County residents. She stated that as they looked at it roll in from 300 responses to 1800 responses, that data stayed the same: efficiency, reliability, and bus stop improvements stayed a priority no matter how many results they got. That is also why they gave the City Council and other organization presentations, as well as stakeholder and agency advisory groups.

Vice Mayor Wright asked how they weigh that public input versus input from City Councils.

Director Epstein stated it was all presented to the Board as what they heard in the survey, their working groups, Councils in other presentations, etc. There is a lot of consistency within Councils and other groups, such as Citizens Advisory Committee and Paratransit Coordinating Council. They heard more about the fiscal responsibility and the budget. They heard more about east/west connections and neighborhood coverage and the specific Coastal issues. An individual project may also fit into different categories.

Vice Mayor Wright asked when is it that Pacifica can find out what is in it for Pacifica if we were to support this measure.

Director Epstein stated they are not doing specific projects right now. It is forthcoming and takes time through a comprehensive operational analysis. The reality is that, if this does not pass, they would have to reassess their entire network and reaction to that. For example, if the Colma BART station is closed, they may stop sending buses there. They do not know what that means for the overall network today. It is a holistic network, but they are very aware that, in past work, the coastal communities, particularly in Pacifica and south of Half Moon Bay, do not feel that they have done enough and that has been made clear to their Board.

Vice Mayor Wright stated Pacificans’ tax dollars helped build transit infrastructure, but we are not benefitting from that. He asked if they consider the fact that we have less service than many other communities that have the economic benefit and transportation infrastructure that makes it much easier for people to commute to the city to get to work.

Director Epstein stated that, as a public transit agency, SamTrans is not asking for them to do anything, vote for anything, or support anything. If it were to pass, that is what this process is

2.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 10 May 11, 2026
and how do we do that. Within that realm that SamTrans has control over, she can just repeat that they made it clear to the Board that the coast feels underserved.

Vice Mayor Wright asked, if one of your constituents comes to you and says what is in it for us and why should we vote for it, what is her answer.

Director Epstein referred to the polling data that found very broad support for public transit in general. Their service connects to BART, which serves more people in San Mateo County than Caltrain by a wide margin. The Daly City BART hub is the major transit hub and Pacifica does have people who take those routes to Daly City and Colma and connect into the rest of the network. There are funds that would come back into the County and SamTrans is looking at how to best distribute those funds, potentially with pilots and other ways for new service while also maintaining the integrity of the core network.

Vice Mayor Wright stated there were not concrete answers to his question.

Director Epstein stated that they are not picking specific projects at this time. However, she would say it is their Board of Directors who are the ones that will direct funds to specific projects and this is a long-term conversation, not an immediate conversation or not at near term.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if there are four existing sales tax measures that help fund transit.

Director Epstein stated Measure RR is pure transit (for Caltrain), Measure A which is a half-cent of SamTrans, and Measure W which is a quarter-cent to SamTrans. The rest is transportation to fund bike paths, highway interchanges, shuttle programs, etc. Measure A is a mixture of funding for Caltrain, shuttles and transit, bike path highway, grade separation, safety improvement, etc. However, SamTrans does not get four operational funding for Measure A.

Vice Mayor Wright asked, in terms of the funding distribution on this measure, if it is true that most of it is going to BART.

Director Epstein stated no, as the way the funds were determined was based on service in the County. BART has a slightly higher percentage than Caltrain. Caltrain is based in San Mateo being one of three partner counties with Santa Clara and San Francisco. She thinks BART has 27% and Caltrain has 24% and MUNI about 7%. The majority of 37% is return to source funds that comes directly back for local administration.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if that is to fund already existing projects.

Director Epstein that is exactly the conversation they are having now, i.e., that SamTrans board has to determine and it will be at the June board meeting.

Vice Mayor Wright stated that it could be for existing already budgeted projects.

Director Epstein stated there will be funds for operational deficit and others. They have their near-term budget which is budgeted and they have their long-term budgets. A good example is the bus stop improvement plan. She thinks they actively budgeted maybe $20 million out of $100 million plan. By the time any funds come in, whatever current budget cycle is, they will be over based on the the length of time it will take for these funds to come in versus what is actively budgeted right now or not lined up.

2.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 11 May 11, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright stated he was looking for a reason to tell Pacificans we should support public transit and be able to tell them what we get here in Pacifica.

Director Epstein emphasized preservation of SamTrans operating service, with high potential for new bus stops. In Pacifica they have a bus stop improvement plan which includes bus stops around the County and there are potentials for pilots, like Ride Plus. She cannot guarantee any specific projects or programs because she does not have direction to do that.

Mayor Boles opened public comments.

Rick Nahass, Pacifica, stated that for the past nine years, SamTrans said the coast does not deserve better public transit because of low ridership. In the past five years, surveys of hundreds of coastside residents say they do not take the bus because it takes too long to get anywhere. He shared his concerns and suggested options on this issue.

Jessica Sheppard, Pacifica, asked Council to support this initiative, even if it is not perfect.

Being able to get public transit to other places is important. She encouraged investing in flexibility and freedom of movement in order to provide that ability to Pacifica residents.

Sue Digre, Pacifica, stated she agrees with the speakers and has dealt with this issue when on Council. She referred to previous shuttles and emphasized the need for ridership within the City. She also emphasized making sure to get ridership on the vehicle if available.

Mayor Boles closed public comments.

Councilmember Beckmeyer asked about the Ride Plus program in Half Moon Bay, in which we do not qualify, despite the fact there was no other service being proffered by SamTrans. She heard positive things about it, and she would like to know more about how one qualifies.

Director Epstein stated they have two Ride Plus programs, which are expensive but popular.

She could see the expansion of that being something these funds could go to, and it would rely on ridership for pilots to continue. They need the help of the cities for marketing, but they hope it works and people love it so it is something they are looking at as a potential for these funds in the future. They do not have resources for mass expansion of Ride Plus at this time with their current funding situation.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated it sounds to her that, with a return to source funding that is coming if Senate Bill 63 passes or sales tax passes, there would be an opportunity for using those dollars for such a program in Pacifica. She asked if that is accurate.

Director Epstein stated there is a potential. They have put it before the Board that there is much desire for neighborhood coverage, which Ride Plus could offer. From that coverage concept, it is the best one they have seen in terms of disabilities to get around the community.

Councilmember Beckmeyer thinks that one of the things that works well for public transit is critical mass. What she sees being a success with SamTrans is the support that is given for moving our students around Pacifica. With the timing, she knows there is work put into planning routes, timing of routes, changes when there is no school during the summer and it gears up for fall again, etc. She is hopeful for an equally creative and energetic look at serving another element of our population in Pacifica, which is seniors. We have an increasing number of senior members in our community and they need to get around. The whole idea of aging in place is

2.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 12 May 11, 2026
not just staying put in your house, but to get around the community. She would love to figure out how to enable that kind of mobility in our community.

Director Epstein mentioned there is always (outside the SamTrans world) the option of applying to the Transportation Authority Shuttle program, a Pacifica-sponsored local shuttle. South San Francisco has a lot of success in that area. She stated that, with the Transportation Authority, they are going to be launching a corridor study, working with the cities on the coast about the projects they have already been working on and how to help them interconnect on all different modes. She stated that the senior population is very much a real issue here.

Councilmember Bier stated she also works for a high school district and she is happy about SamTrans’ school service, but she is not sure it is fulfilling the needs of our students.

Director Epstein stated that, on the after school service, they do not have the resources to run multiple buses after school so it is either the kids who get out at dismissal or covering the afterschool programs. It is an unfunded gap.

Councilmember Bier agreed and expressed concerns about young riders. She knows ridership has been low in Pacifica historically, and she thinks the only way we can promote ridership is if we have a decent system to get us places.

Mayor Boles thinks another missing piece in Pacifica is connection to Skyline College due to the number of high school students attending and being unable to drive themselves. She mentioned potential equity issues for underserved portions of the community that did not have bus stops. If we had some shuttle that went from Sharp Park to Skyline, and then went over to Millbrae BART and Caltrans, that would be so many more commuters you would capture. She appreciated that they will be looking at the routes but emphasized the opportunities lost from people not riding because they do not have any good options now.

Councilmember Espinosa stated we do need transportation and shared a personal anecdote where she walked for over an hour because there were no better alternatives for transportation.

Mayor Boles asked where can Council and the community come to speak about this.

Director Epstein stated the next opportunity for public comment is their June 3 Board meeting.

Mayor Boles stated later on, assuming the ballot measure is successful, there will be opportunities for us as part of their process to evaluate the routes.

Director Epstein stated what will happen on June 3 is a high level framework. Specific list of projects going to certain communities will go through regular transportation planning. One thing they do at SamTrans is that they build out their community engagement program, partner with community-based organizations, do extensive outreach in communities, have their working groups, etc. With any transportation planning that is coming out of this, there will be extensive opportunities to engage and influence the project itself as it moves forward.

Vice Mayor Wright believes, at their last Board meeting, they discussed a 5% of return to source funding going towards potholes.

Director Epstein stated that is one element of what could be funded.

2.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 13 May 11, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright understood and emphasized that our streets are in need of attention and would need more of return to source funding going for the transportation routes to repair roads.

Director Epstein understood that this would have to be project-based. She reminded him that the renewal of Measure A is where all of the pass through pothole funding is coming from but she will take the note that the “fix it” categories are insufficient and he would like to see more towards potholes on fixed route transit streets.

Vice Mayor Wright agreed and added more express buses down the highway. He mentioned our Housing Element has a number of sites counting on there being public transportation infrastructure that is affecting the number of parking spots.

Mayor Boles stated, as a follow up to that, these developers will have to do transportation demand management planning and that could go into a shuttle program. We need to identify those needs and have those projects that they can pay into as they are building their projects.

Vice Mayor Wright supported public transportation. He wants to be able to go to his people and give them a reason to support it and he needs her help with a plan that says this is what they are going to do.

Director Epstein stated they need to do transportation planning thoughtfully and the ballot measure passing would be necessary for that. She cannot promise any specific project or funding for Pacifica.

Vice Mayor Wright was trying to advocate as strongly as he can and understood the issues with the budget deficit.

Mayor Boles thanked Director Epstein for being present and taking Council’s questions and feedback.

Director Epstein stated that they will be back with the Transportation Authority and will be back for future studies and transportation work.

RESULT: NO VOTE REQUIRED

10. Approve the updated City of Pacifica 2023 to 2030 Strategic Plan Mission, Vision, Values, Goals and Strategies
PROPOSED ACTION: Approve the updated City of Pacifica 2023 to 2030 Strategic Plan Mission, Vision, Values, Goals and Strategies.

Asst. City Manager Carter and Strategic Plan Facilitator Greg Larson presented the staff report.

Facilitator Larson asked for any questions on Goal 1B.

Mayor Boles asked him to remind her about the tobacco and cannabis licensing.

Facilitator Larson stated cannabis licensing came up in the realm of possibly looking at the newer models that might be out there for cannabis product perveance via lounges and onsite consumption, rather than offsite sales. Those may create revenue-positive opportunities for the

2.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 14 May 11, 2026
City. Similarly, tobacco could be enforcement which might create revenue opportunities or pursuing what other communities have done to possibly increase tobacco revenue.

Councilmember Bier concluded the tobacco retail license fee.

Strategic Plan Facilitator Larson agreed.

Facilitator Larson asked for any questions on Goal 2.

Councilmember Espinosa stated she would like to revisit this Goal to include a bathroom for Fairmont Park on the Strategic Plan.

Facilitator Larson thinks, following public comment, that would be the appropriate time to bring that up as a change to see if the Council concurs and staff’s response. He made a note of it.

Facilitator Larson asked for any questions on Goal 3C.

Mayor Boles stated we had discussed wanting to continue the Temporary Safe Parking Program and asked if that is separate from the category of interim housing solutions.

Facilitator Larson saw that as part of the interim housing solutions as it is dealing with shortterm housing demand.

Mayor Boles stated that the issue is, in terms of budget, it is a big difference in working toward solutions or continuing a program we have that is expensive. She stated that we will put a pin in that one.

Mayor Boles opened public comments.

Gail Benton Shoemaker, Pacifica, stated she was speaking as a citizen and sent a letter to Council with a request to change 10B to “Adopt a 25% urban forest canopy goal, remove loophole language from the tree ordinance, work on urban forestry plan, inventory and projects.” Cindy Abbott, Pacifica, agreed with the proposed change by Ms. Shoemaker. She also referred to Goal 5 and suggested changing use of the word “harness” to “engage and nurture”.

Sue Digre, Pacifica, emphasized the need for ample opportunities for the public to know what is happening and be engaged in a timely manner. She also supported what Ms. Benton Shoemaker and Ms. Abbott said.

Jessica Sheppard, Pacifica, described the additional layer of barrier that meeting times can present for people working 8 AM to 5 PM. Therefore, if we want people to get involved, we not only need to give the advance notice, but the meetings also need to be an accessible time.

Facilitator Larson turned to Goal No. 1.

Vice Mayor Wright referred to Goal 1A. Because we pay people on average 13-15% less than their peers in other municipalities, he reads that to include trying to be more competitive.

Mayor Boles agreed, adding fair salary is one of the reasons behind staff retention.

2.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 15 May 11, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright stated, as long as that is considered an inclusion, that makes him happy.

City Council discussed changing portions of Goal 1B or 1D, primarily regarding removing or leaving in “plan check services.”
Strategic Plan Facilitator Larson added, as the outside consultant, in cities that he has worked with both as manager and a consultant but had an in house building official, they justify the full time expense of that and handle some of the plan check services with staff.

There was Council consensus to leave Goal 1B and 1D as is.

Facilitator Larson turned to Goal No. 2. There were no changes made by Council.

Facilitator Larson turned to Goal No. 3.

Facilitator Larson referred to Councilmember Espinosa’s request about the bathroom in Fairmont Park. He stated that was a clear part of the discussion and part of the closing exercise they did at the Council workshop and he thinks staff was aware of that as a possible work plan item that may become a budget allocation need, not necessarily a strategy unless Council decided otherwise.

Mayor Boles asked if it would possibly be included in the Facilities Assessment Study.

Facilitator Larson stated it could be included there and, depending on the scale of the project that staff is looking out for it, if it is a lower scaled project it might be more of a budgetary decision; if there will be groundskeeping facility along with public restrooms, sewer, plumbing and piping, then it needs to be part of the Facilities Assessment Study. It depends on the scale of the project.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated, if we are talking about a bathroom facility in a park that does not have one at all, it needs to be part of the Facilities Assessment Study.

Councilmember Espinosa stated there is a facility with a restroom but it is used for day care only, not for the public. It will cost less money because we already have the infrastructure there.

Councilmember Beckmeyer concluded there is an existing building.

Vice Mayor Wright stated it would still be a new structure and new plumbing, which would fall under the Facilities Assessment Study.

Councilmember Espinosa stated it is but because we already have the pipes nearby, it will not cost as much as putting in new pipes. She would like to see it considered.

Mayor Boles stated there is another option of the Throne toilets, approximately $75,000 a year, which handles the infrastructure and maintenance. She would like to see it on the work plan.

Facilitator Larson stated he is hearing Council direction to staff to include the north end bathroom facility as a work plan item, either under the Facilities Assessment Study if it is of that scale and magnitude, or as a stand alone work plan item if there is an interim or smaller scale solution and that is what staff would bring back to them for consideration on June 8.

2.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 16 May 11, 2026
Councilmember Espinosa agreed.

Asst. City Manager Carter stated her understanding is that Facilities Assessment Study would cover existing facilities, not new facilities. If Council wants to consider a new facility, that would be part of a later CIP discussion. It would be focused on funding more than feasibility.

Mayor Boles stated the other assessment study she was referring to was the parks assessment so we can also have that conversation as part of that presentation from the PB&R Commission and understand the equity issues around town.

Asst. City Manager Carter agreed, but if Council wants to call out the potential new facilities, it sounds more like a CIP agenda topic rather than for the Strategic Plan.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if it would be more appropriate to put it on the CIP list.

Asst. City Manager Carter agreed. In the next agenda item, there is a list of funded and unfunded CIPs, and they are all for Council discussion.

Mayor Boles asked how a small project, like a $75,000 bathroom, compares to a big CIP of a new bathroom facility in a park that might cost several hundred thousand.

Asst. City Manager Carter agreed, adding, to Mr. Larson’s point, if you want to establish or study feasibility, you can do it here. Alternatively, you can discuss allocation of funding.

City Attorney Kenyon thinks the question of the Mayor is would the CIP be a proper place to have that discussion for a project that is $75,000. She thinks the answer is yes.

Asst. City Manager Carter agreed.

Facilitator Larson stated, for either scale, it could be there.

Mayor Boles understood it does not belong here and we will come back to it.

Councilmember Beckmeyer added at the CIP discussion.

Facilitator Larson referred to affordable housing and including interim housing solutions, which would include the Temporary Safe Parking Program.

City Manager Charpentier stated that there is a Housing Element policy, HE-10, where it specifies assisting non-profits with providing the types of services and programs that are in the Temporary Safe Parking Program.

City Attorney Kenyon read the language in the Housing Element that they are required by law to implement: “The city shall support non-profits that offer housing solutions and services for the homeless. The city shall support with staff expertise and funding as available, non-profit organizations that offer solutions to solving homelessness and/or providing housing related services for the homeless or at risk homeless.”
Mayor Boles asked what the timeline is for that.

City Attorney Kenyon stated Director Updegrave may know what the timeline is.

2.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 17 May 11, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright asked staff what is the downside of leaving it in.

City Attorney Kenyon stated that there is no downside, just what is it that you want to include and do you want it to focus on this language or other language. Council may feel this language is adequate or feel that additional language in here needs to emphasize this language that it feels adequate or feel that this language is not adequate and add another item to the work plan.

Councilmember Bier thinks we have to call it out and include what is the city’s role in this, including interim housing solutions, besides supporting the non-profits.

City Attorney Kenyon stated that there could be language put at the end of that sentence that said “including interim housing solutions provided for by the City”. Housing Element implementation is already included in the Housing Element, but that second phrase would be interim housing solutions provided by the City which, to her point, is different than this Housing Element implementation which focuses on non-profit.

Vice Mayor Wright stated that would preclude them from working with the County because it would not be a City project if we are doing something with the County instead.

City Attorney Kenyon thinks we are providing services and we may not be the ultimate funder but we are taking action to create more services for the unhoused. However we may do that, she thinks it would fit under the definition of the City providing services or we could change it.

Vice Mayor Wright asked how about including facilitating interim housing solutions by the City.

Councilmember Bier emphasize that we are equal partners, not only supporting the non-profit.

City Attorney Kenyon suggested “prioritizing Housing Element program implementations and…” Facilitator Larson concluded “interim housing solutions”. He stated one could argue you are putting interim housing solutions as the most important thing to move forward with in the Housing Element program implementation because it is the only thing in the Housing Element you are calling out. He is not sure the Council’s discussion on March 7 was that robust to make that statement but it is clear there is a sense of it not being sufficient without it being cited.

Therefore, he followed the City Attorney’s suggestion and further asked where does the City want to allocate limited funds in light of the priority required by the Housing Element.

Mayor Boles stated this, in particular, refers to a program that is ongoing that Council wanted to continue to make sure we have something for our unhoused. That will need to come up in the budget discussion, but it is something we are committing to address.

There was Council consensus to update Goal 3B to “Prioritize Housing Element program implementation and prioritize interim housing solutions.” Facilitator Larson turned to Goal No. 4.

Facilitator Larson raised two questions for Council: Does Council wish to follow the public strong request to articulate an explicit goal now or does Council want to let the planning process lead to what is the appropriate goals for Pacifica? Furthermore, does Council want the tree ordinance called out or is action imminent with Council direction that will happen?

2.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 18 May 11, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright suggested “prioritizing refinement of the tree ordinance, including loophole language” or something more specific to make that part of the canopy plan.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated what has been asked by the community in more than one public comment or more than one time before this body for over more than one year specifically regarding this item, is changes to the current language which reads “continue the urban forestry plan, tree canopy goals, inventory and project, prioritizing refinement of the tree ordinance loophole language”. The proposed changes to that language read “adopt a 25% urban forest canopy goal, remove loophole language from tree ordinance, work on Urban Forestry Plan, inventory and projects”. She stated it is very specific with regard to the percent of the canopy goal, specifically referring to loophole language and removing it, and it includes the Urban Forestry Plan inventory and projects.

Vice Mayor Wright thinks in order of priority the Urban Forestry Plan should be stated first.

Mayor Boles suggested “start the Urban Forestry Plan”.

Vice Mayor Wright stated including a 25% canopy goal and removing loophole language. He stated the canopy goal is part of the Urban Forestry Plan, not the other way around.

Mayor Boles asked if he was saying, because we have not started the Urban Forestry Plan and it might be some years before that happens, that we cannot have a canopy goal at this point.

Vice Mayor Wright stated that is not what he is saying.

Councilmember Beckmeyer concluded the idea of continuing the Urban Forestry Plan does not make sense to Mayor Boles because we have not started it.

Asst. City Manager Carter stated that the work is underway. She stated we are currently ready to go out with the RFP and the majority of Public Works’ time will be spent next year on this project. Typically, the plan will provide when it is done the full inventory of all trees, both public and private. To the Mayor’s point, that is when you usually set the goals, after you know what to tie those goals to. Therefore, one question is about 25% goals and do you want to set it now before you know what the inventory is and what Urban Forestry Management Plan will show at the study. The second question is do you want to look at the ordinance before the plan is done.

Councilmember Bier stated we do not want any less than 25%.

Mayor Boles stated that we are not doing a complete review of the ordinance without looking at this language which she thinks they can look at separately.

Councilmember Beckmeyer personally thinks we should include 25%, which is called out in the Climate Action Plan as well. She thinks the recommendations from the community has been based on what other communities have done that are also tree cities, etc. She believes, with the connection between the 25% and the loophole language is because their interest is to see the 2-1 happening all the time.

Mayor Boles mentioned helping otherwise healthy trees.

2.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 19 May 11, 2026
Facilitator Larson suggested “complete the Urban Forestry Inventory Plan with a 25% canopy goal and projects”.

Mayor Boles asked if we can say “at least” or “minimum”.

Facilitator Larson updated the suggestion to state “complete the Urban Forestry Inventory and Plan with 25% tree canopy goals”. The next question is how do you handle the tree ordinance.

Mayor Boles thinks part of the problem is tying the tree canopy goals to the Urban Forestry Plan. What she is hearing is that we would like to adopt a tree canopy goal now and then continue the Urban Forestry Plan inventory projects.

Mayor Boles, Vice Mayor Wright, and Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to the language from public comments.

City Manager Charpentier stated, if that is the direction, the Urban Forestry Master Plan may prioritize preservation, so we may have to come back and have this conversation again. He stated it would not be to say not have 25% but it may have different levels of prioritization between preservation and expansion.

Councilmember Beckmeyer believes it is not only the future trees that are contributing to the 25% canopy goal. What needs to be assessed is what percent we have now and what do we need to do to get to 25%.

Mayor Boles recalled we have about 17% now and we are doing Arbor Day projects and tree planting 2:1. We are working towards that goal from now.

Vice Mayor Wright stated that the heritage tree ordinance will, over time, preserve more trees than what has happened in the past.

Mayor Boles asked to refine “loopholes” to “refine the tree health definition”.

City Attorney Kenyon advised Council not to direct revisions to an ordinance. Instead of loophole, we can say “vague language”.

Mayor Boles stated that, in the public comments, it was two places where it says “otherwise healthy trees” and there are ranges of what is a healthy tree.

City Attorney Kenyon stated if there are two areas in the ordinance that need to be clarified she suggested “prioritize revision to the ordinance to address ambiguities with language ‘otherwise healthy trees’”.

Facilitator Larson asked if this is coming from the PB&R Commission.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated no, it’s coming from the public.

Mayor Boles stated that it is certainly being discussed at PB&R Commission.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated the connection to the PB&R Commission is because the ambiguity of the language is making tree appeals difficult to handle. If that language was made less ambiguous it would be clearer for the Commission that handles tree appeals.

2.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 20 May 11, 2026
City Attorney Kenyon reiterated the final change as “prioritizing revising the ordinance to eliminate ambiguous language related to tree health”.

Vice Mayor Wright stated as point of order it is 9:58 p.m.

Mayor Boles stated she did not know if we will finish by 11:00 pm.

City Attorney Kenyon asked about removing anything from the agenda at this point.

Mayor Boles stated the budget is the last thing.

Vice Mayor Wright moved to extend the meeting to 11:30 pm; seconded by Councilmember Bier.

EXTENDED MEETING TO 11:30 PM
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa
Facilitator Larson concluded Goal 4B would be revised to “adopt a 25% urban forest canopy goal, complete the Urban Forestry Plan and tree inventory and prioritize revising ambiguous language related to tree health”.

Mayor Boles referred to the suggestion from Ms. Abbott about the word “harness”.

Facilitator Larson stated her language was to “creatively engage and nurture community expertise advocates and volunteers”. He stated that the word “harness” was a point of discussion previously and he offered and Council agreed then to differentiate the three roles for the public. There is drawing in the public as experts, there is drawing in the public as advocates, and there is drawing in the public as volunteers. They may remember the discussion then with the City Attorney that advocates cannot necessarily be expert serving as volunteers because they are wearing hats that inherently conflict, so differentiating roles becomes important due to public process requirements. He does not think Council’s use of the word harness was controlling but was to engage and nurture, to have it help pull the organization forward. He thinks the challenge becomes resource management, such as handling significant staff reductions across the organization.

City Attorney Kenyon stated, as a reminder to Council, these are the Council’s goals and priorities and however Council interprets “harness” will be the law of Council. If Council is agreeing with the public speaker, who said that “harness” can be constricting, then you can come up with any word you want and this record becomes part of what you call the legislative history so whatever term you want to insert in there will be the term as you all define it.

Facilitator Larson recommended “creatively engage community expertise, advocates, and volunteers to advance City priorities”.

There was Council consensus.

2.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 21 May 11, 2026
Mayor Boles referred to Goal 5D and asked if it is about regional and/or local commissions, boards, and committees.

Facilitator Larson thought that change removes the ambiguity and clarifies it. He referred to how we get our commissions, boards, committees and Council in alignment, given resource constraints but also recognizing all the regional bodies have rules to play there as well.

City Attorney Kenyon would say one of the reasons it probably was not included because the City includes our commissions and committees. She thinks the way to revise it would be “between City Council and local and regional commissions, boards and committees”.

Mayor Boles asked if it was just City Council or also the City, such as our police department.

City Attorney Kenyon stated that the point is our committees are part of the City as well, just as our police department is. We are all part of the city. If the City Council implements policy, we are required to implement the policy so it will be implemented if that is what Council wants.

Mayor Boles concluded that she is suggesting adding “between City Council, local and regional commissions, boards and committees”.

There was Council consensus.

Facilitator Larson stated we are now prepared for a motion incorporating adopting the Strategic Plan with all of the changes as discussed with each goal.

Councilmember Bier moved; seconded by Vice Mayor Wright.

RESULT: ADOPTED AS AMENDED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa

11. Fiscal Year 2026-27 Base Budget and Introduction of the 2026-31 Capital Improvement Program
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept the report and provide feedback and direction on the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 Base Budget, and introduction of the FY 2026-31 Capital Improvement Program.

City Manager Charpentier, Asst. City Manager Carter, Administrative Services Director Marisol Gómez, PW Dep. Director Roland Yip, and WW Engineering Manager Daniel Patten presented the staff report.

Vice Mayor Wright was excited to hear about the solar project at the wastewater plant. He asked what percentage of the PG&E bill we may be able to cover with that.

WW Engineering Manager Patten stated, based on previous energy consumption before replacing the EV system, these panels are going to produce somewhere between 5 and 10% of the total usage. A larger portion of that may be their new EV equipment that has been in operation the last six months and is significantly more efficient.

2.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 22 May 11, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright asked how does the public access Council questions and emails to understand the dialogue going on in addition to the agenda packet between staff and Council.

Asst. City Manager Carter stated that the questions and answers are shared with the public.

City Clerk Coffey stated that we typically print the questions and answers that are provided to Council and make those available in the public agenda binder in the back of the room.

Vice Mayor Wright concluded the public needs to check the public agenda binder to access answers to these questions. He asked, if it was a Councilmember’s prerogative to inform the community about one of their questions, would they need to reiterate that question here.

City Attorney Kenyon stated that the purpose of asking questions ahead of time is to limit the number of questions at the meeting. What most Councilmembers do in the jurisdictions she has worked in is let their community at the dais know that they had a lot of questions, they were all answered and, if you want to give them more details on the type of questions you ask and got answers to, that would be fine as well.

Vice Mayor Wright stated that the major point he tried to make through his questions is that when we are talking about this budget, it is at the current level of staffing which is 15% below.

Mayor Boles agreed it is 15.3% below other cities.

Vice Mayor Wright added underpaying people. He wants the community to understand that they are asking staff to do more with less.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to packet page 15 with regard to some of the projects Manager Patten mentioned. For the environmental compliance project on Item 15, she asked if other environmental agencies that are California agencies permit it.

WW Engineering Manager Patten stated that it can be federal, state and local.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to packet page 16, project No. 23, Crespi De Anza Sewer Replacement project, and she asked which side of the highway is that on.

WW Engineering Manager Patten stated that it is near the walking path on Pacifica State Beach.

Councilmember Beckmeyer concluded on the west side, and that will require a Coastal Development Permit.

WW Engineering Manager Patten stated very likely.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to No. 26, the lateral grant assistance program. She asked if staff will be informing residents about fairly recent changes in City policy adopted by Council about street cuts so that, if they did not opt to do their lateral when this project is going on and they opt to do it later, that the cost will be increased because of the street cut fee.

WW Engineering Manager Patten agreed, adding that they will mention that during the one or two public meetings that they have budgeted for with their consultant and through other means,

2.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 23 May 11, 2026
and they will keep Council informed on when we are having public meetings and other activities with the project.

Councilmember Espinosa had concerns about the budget. We receive 53.2 million and we spend 57.1 million. We asked different departments to reduce expenditures by 5%. She asked what that 5% is going to take us next year, assuming that we have to increase salary. She also asked what happens if we do not receive the money from the vehicle license fee. The other thing is, what happens if we have to hire somebody.

Asst. City Manager Carter referred to the long-term financial outlook. Staff will update the longterm financial projections for future years, once we know what the recommended budget is going to be. Staff presented the preliminary projections for the future years and the following year deficit was in the same magnitude of $3 million. The VLF is an ongoing issue. Staff budgeted it for the base budget on the revenue side but also filled that in the reserves; thus, if the State falls through on its obligations, we will patch the hole from the reserves. However, this is not a sustainable strategy long term. As far as the service enhancement, unfortunately, that is part of the whole discussion we are having without renewable ongoing revenue streams. It is going to be very challenging to entertain certain enhancements. All service enhancements will have to come with a very robust recommendation of why it is being asked and how it will improve service down the road, gain some efficiencies, save somewhere else, etc. That is what we will be expecting from departments.

Mayor Boles stated that we are all worried about budget and that is why we are focusing on economic development and trying to find other ways to bring money into the City.

Asst. City Manager Carter referred to the revenue study sessions in November, which had short term and longer term strategies, including economic development strategies and user fee study that will come to Council later to review development in-lieu fees and make sure we are recovering the cost at the fee level. Unfortunately, we are not done with this study before the budget but it is already in the works. Some of the strategies are longer term so that is why we need to balance the budget in the short term.

Mayor Boles stated in terms of the roadwork it is a huge cut out of the $1.5 million budget to lose $1 million because we are losing residents here in Pacifica. It looks like PW Dep. Director Yip is not proposing any smaller projects here, at least through this fiscal year, but at some point in the master plan of the roadwork, if the lower amount we will be getting from grants continue, does this mean that the project scopes are going to have to be reduced.

PW Dep. Director Yip stated we are going to continue and fully fund the next projects in the fiveyear master plan. The reason why the General Fund is going to have less of a transfer going in is because Measure A will fund the five-year master plan.

Mayor Boles asked if we will discuss one-time contributions at the next meeting.

Asst. City Manager Carter stated Council will weigh in on all budget options at the next meeting, but if she feels that she is ready to make some recommendations, staff will entertain them and integrate them in the next budget study session discussion.

Mayor Boles opened public comments.

2.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 24 May 11, 2026
Kimberly Finale, Pacifica, thanked them for their service and continued dedication to this democratic process. She felt there was a lot of uncertainty with many fearing what the future holds, mentioning all the aspects of problems in the economy, and as a community, they will need to make difficult budget decisions and shared her thoughts on options needed.

Mayor Boles closed public comments.

Mayor Boles moved to extend the meeting to 11:45 p.m.; seconded by Councilmember Beckmeyer.

EXTENDED MEETING TO 11:45 PM
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Christine Boles, Mayor
SECONDER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa
Mayor Boles appreciated the work staff is doing to find ways to save and we are in this together.

RESULT: NO VOTE REQUIRED

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Boles stated she and Vice Mayor Wright have been to Sacramento twice trying to advocate for our VLF and it sounded positive in the Assembly, less positive in the Senate. As Finance Director Gómez stated, we hope this money might be included in the next budget that comes out in June.

Councilmember Bier thanked them for their advocacy and further thanked Mayor Boles and Councilmember Beckmeyer for coming to the mayor’s mental health training the past Saturday.

Mayor Boles thanked Councilmember Bier for all that hard work.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Charpentier thanked everyone for a productive meeting and giving staff direction on the strategic priorities and he looks forward for returning for the budget conversation.

ADJOURN
Mayor Boles adjourned the meeting at 11:29 p.m. in honor of Thirawath (Tom) Hlawphakdi from Pacifica Thai.

Transcribed by Barbara Medina, Public Meeting Stenographer.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
______________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor

2.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 5-11-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes)

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Christine Boles
Vice Mayor Greg Wright
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Mayra Espinosa
City Council Regular Meeting 1 May 26, 2026
May 26, 2026 (TUESDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Christine Boles called the meeting to order on May 26, 2026 at 6:03 PM 6:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Boles called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Christine Boles Mayor Present
Greg Wright Vice Mayor Present
Sue Beckmeyer Councilmember Present 6:08 pm
Mary Bier Councilmember Present
Mayra Espinosa Councilmember Present
City Clerk Coffey took a verbal roll call.

Staff Present: Sean Charpentier, City Manager; Marc Tran, Asst. City Attorney; Yulia Carter, Asst. City Manager; Maria Sarasua, Police Chief; Melissa Tigbao, PW Director; Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director; Marisol Gómez, Finance & Administrative Services Director; Scott Leslie, PB&R Director; Daniel Patten, Wastewater Engineering Manager; Matt Kelly, Project Manager; Bill Glasgo, Police Captain; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk; Emily La, Dep. City Clerk.

Reading of Land Acknowledgment
Mayor Boles read the Land Acknowledgment.

Salute to the Flag led by Mayor Boles

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation: Pride Month (June 2026)
Mayor Boles read the proclamation in honor of Pride Month.

Lauren Smith, Board President of Coast Pride, thanked Councilmembers and wished them a happy Pride Month. She stated that Pacifica Pride is coming up on June 6. The Pride Parade

2.b
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 2 May 26, 2026
is a family friendly celebration where neighbors can come together, kids are welcome, and the whole community can show up exactly as they are. Pacifica Pride is a public declaration where the City sees its LGBTQ residents and the community belongs here and Pacifica stands for inclusion, especially at a moment when that message has never been more needed. They live in a time when LGBTQ people, particularly queer youth, who are being targeted and unwelcome in our communities. The center of Coast Pride’s work is “Allcove,” a new drop in center in Half Moon Bay offering mental health, primary care and peer support for any young person who lives on the coast, ages 12-25, regardless of who they are or came from. Pacifica Pride is a key pillar in that mission and the collaboration with city government is essential. As federal funding continues to shrink, they are asking Council to fund Pacifica Pride and send an unambiguous message about the kind of city Pacifica chooses to be.

Councilmember Bier stated it was so good to see Lauren Smith and was glad she was president of Coast Pride. She felt Coast Pride is an important agency on the coastside and she encourages everyone to look at their website and support them. She stated young people from Pescadero to Pacifica are benefitting from all the services they provide on the coastside. She stated, in her job, she does prevention and intervention work in San Mateo and she is excited that there is going to be an Allcove on the coastside.

Vice Mayor Wright thanked Ms. Smith for showing up tonight. During his lifetime, people never would have sat here and talked about this and how things have changed and they are able to do a proclamation and talk about it in public on TV. He thanked them for that.

Councilmember Espinosa stated that it is important to celebrate diversity every day. There is still education to be done in the community, and she wants to let them know that we see them, value them and are proud to be their neighbors.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated it was rewarding for her to see Pride continuing to happen.

She cannot wait for June as it is so meaningful and special Mayor Boles thanked Lauren Smith and Dana Johnson for being here and for all the work Coast Pride does in Pacifica and the coast. It is a celebration for our diverse community.

Dana Johnson (they/he) accepted the proclamation on behalf of the LGBTQIA+ Commission, as well as a board member for Coast Pride. Dana Johnson thanked Council in all their support with progressive Pride proclamation. They appreciate the affirmation of inclusion for the LGBTQIA+ community in San Mateo County but more so on the coast. The LGBTQIA+ Commission will continue to advocate for the importance of equitable and inclusive community for our diverse LGBTQIA+ community. They are constantly trying to make sure they are seen, visible and belong in the spaces, and the proclamation and raising of the Progress Pride flag lets them know as a community that they belong here and have safety in this space.

There were no public comments.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Bier moved to amend the order of the agenda and vote to rearrange Item 4 to the end of the meeting; seconded by Councilmember Beckmeyer.

2.b
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 3 May 26, 2026
REORDER ITEMS ON THE AGENDA (MOVE AGENDA ITEM #4 AFTER AGENDA ITEM #6) RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa
Mayor Boles asked if any Councilmembers want to pull any Consent items. There were none.

There were no public comments.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa

1. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes for the March 7, 2026 City Council Study Session and the March 9, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting.

2. Terminating Proclamation of Local Emergency, Approving an Agreement for Construction, and Notice of Completion for the Vallemar Phase II Emergency Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to Adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Terminating the Proclamation of Local Emergency, Approval of an Agreement for Construction, accepting completion, and directing the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Vallemar Phase II Emergency Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project; and authorize the City Manager to release the retention funds to the contractor.

3. Quarterly Financial Report for General Fund for the quarter ending March 31, 2026 PROPOSED ACTION: Review and accept the Quarterly Financial Report for General Fund for the quarter ending March 31, 2026.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
Ed Ochi, Pacifica, stated he is speaking as an individual. Project 1334 did their official launch at the last Council meeting and is giving an update with 48 businesses that signed up and thanked everyone for their help.

Delia McGrath, Pacifica, spoke on the ongoing war in Gaza and requested Pacifica reach out to Congressman Liccardo to sponsor HR 3565, Block the Bombs Act, and/or pass a resolution to similar effect. She also emphasized continuing the Temporary Safe Parking Program in light of its community benefits and success.

Charles Goetchius, Pacifica, stated the Manor area has received increased air traffic noise due to runway repair at SFO and requested the City Council to send a letter to the airport for data and updates.

Elisa Fassler, Pacifica, agreed with Mr. Goetchius. She also shared the frequency of the flights, which has become intolerable.

2.b
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 4 May 26, 2026
Samantha Hauser, Pacifica, stated she is speaking as an individual briefly about pollinators and shared information on how to address bee swarms.

Gloria Stofan, Pacifica, emphasized continuing the Temporary Safe Parking Program in light of its community benefits and success.

Ellen Hage, Pacifica, stated she is a leader with Faith in Action Bay Area and Coastside Faith in Action and is speaking about the Temporary Safe Parking Program. She emphasized continuing the Temporary Safe Parking Program in light of its community benefits and success.

Suzanne Moore, Pacifica, stated she supported Ms. McGrath in her bid for peace. She then shared updated County information on homelessness and shared thoughts on improvements brought on by Temporary Safe Parking Program for our community.

Linda Peebles, Pacifica, emphasized continuing the Temporary Safe Parking Program in light of its community benefits and success.

Valeria Lapin, Pacifica, supported Mr. Goetchius and Ms. Fassler on the airport issues. She also shared her concerns about fireworks and suggested a neighborhood watch to assist the police with capturing illegal fireworks.

PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.

CONSIDERATION

4. Appointments to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission and Open Space and Parkland Advisory Committee
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to appoint:

A) two (2) applicants to the Open Space and Parkland Advisory Committee for full 4-year terms to expire May 2030; and
B) two (2) applicants to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission for full 4-year terms to expire May 2030.

Note: Agenda Item #4 was considered following Item #6 as a result of the Council’s vote to reorder the Agenda items.

City Clerk Coffey presented the staff report.

Councilmember Bier moved to appoint Cindy Abbott and Kyle Boswell to the Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission.

Mayor Boles recalled the interviews with Kyle Boswell across recruitments and in the latest interview he stated he had a preference for OSPAC as that tied into his graduate research.

Councilmember Bier revised her motion to appoint Cindy Abbott and Marisa George to the Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission, each to a full four-year term to expire May 2030; seconded by Councilmember Espinosa.

2.b
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 5 May 26, 2026
APPOINTMENTS TO THE PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION:

Cindy Abbott (4-year term to expire May 2030)
Marisa George (4-year term to expire May 2030)
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Mayra Espinosa, Councilmember
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa
Councilmember Bier moved to appoint Michael Kahn and Kyle Boswell to the Open Space and Parkland Advisory Committee, each to a full four-year term to expire May 2030; seconded by Councilmember Beckmeyer.

APPOINTMENTS TO THE OPEN SPACE AND PARKLAND ADVISORY COMMITTEE:

Michael Kahn (4-year term to expire May 2030)
Kyle Boswell (4-year term to expire May 2030)
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa

5. Annual Reports to City Council from the Planning Commission; Emergency Preparedness & Safety Commission; Beautification Advisory Committee; Library Advisory Committee; and Open Space and Parkland Advisory Committee PROPOSED ACTION: Receive informational annual report presentations from each commission and committee, provide feedback, and receive and file the annual report of each commission and committee.

Representatives from the Planning Commission; Emergency Preparedness & Safety Commission; Beautification Advisory Committee; Library Advisory Committee; and Open Space and Parkland Advisory Committee presented their annual reports to Council. Council thanked all Commissions/Committees for their hard work.

Mayor Boles opened public comments.

Ken Miles, Pacifica, expressed concerns about e-bikes on trails used by community members.

Suzanne Moore, Pacifica, stated she was amazed how much volunteer work is done and thanked the committees for their hard work.

Mayor Boles closed public comments.

RESULT: NO VOTE REQUIRED

6. Climate Action and Resiliency Committee FY 2026–2027 Work Plan PROPOSED ACTION: Receive a presentation and provide feedback on the Climate Action and Resilience Committee FY 2026-2027 Workplan.

2.b
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 6 May 26, 2026
City Manager Charpentier stated the Climate Action & Resilience Committee came out of the approval of the Climate Action & Resiliency Plan (CARP) plan last year and a sign of success of Pacifica trying to address climate resiliency in collaboration with residents. After the adoption of the Climate Action and Resiliency Plan, one of the recommendations was the formation of this committee. Since then, they have had five meetings during this calendar year and, in those meetings, they have been able to accomplish quite a bit, including being involved in discussions about the tree canopy as well as the creation of their first work plan.

Chair Deirdre Martin, Vice Chair Margo Meiman, and Committee Member Celeste Langille presented the report.

Mayor Boles stated that we are so grateful for their work. She knows there will be direction on the work plan requiring input from staff concerns about staff capacity, some of which will need to wait until the budget discussion on June 8.

City Manager Charpentier thanked them for their work and noted that the CARP is three things at once: necessary, aspirational and multi-year. The staff report tried to make a good faith estimate of how some of these activities would fit within the current staffing resources we have available. The June 8 meeting will have a broader organizational discussion about what the budget looks like and how we are facing a $2.8 million deficit (approximately before the VLF funding was not included in the Governor’s May revised budget) and the target reductions for each department. He added this is necessary and aspirational for us to accomplish our goals and also multi-year, and through that budget process, we will have an outline of what some of the resources will be within the context of the entire City organization.

Chair Martin confirmed the recommended action is to provide feedback on the workplan.

City Manager Charpentier responded affirmatively.

Mayor Boles opened public comments.

Jessica Sheppard, Pacifica, shared an app called “Too Good to Go” that could be a great resource for food accessibility and food waste reduction.

Remi Tan, Pacifica, was speaking as a resident. He shared his concerns about SamTrans bus reduction, encouraged Council to continue working with PCE regarding hot water heater emergency replacements, asked Council to look into companies for installing EV charging ports, and suggested a new carpooling resource called Crewz.

Ken Miles, Pacifica, shared his concerns on this committee working with urban forest goals as it may conflict with some wildfire issues, namely urban forestry vs. fire safety, especially regarding the types of trees in the City. He supported the idea of solar power in Pacifica.

Carl Schwab, Pacifica, hopes CARC will get cooperation from the City and other funding sources to make the CARC workplan and CARP happen.

Mayor Boles closed public comments.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to packet page 156, Item 1-B: Liaisons to city committees/commissions. It references “contributing relevant information to the City’s regular CARP-related newsletter (prepared by staff)”. She asked who is handling the newsletter now.

2.b
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 7 May 26, 2026
Vice Chair Meiman stated that it is being done completely by the CivicSpark Fellow Bella Carreon. She stated the position is until September 2026, and we would have to apply for grant funding again. If that position is not reinstated and continued, then the newsletter may not be able to continue.

Mayor Boles added that her understanding from previous years is that it is a $40,000 payment from the City and is grant-funded otherwise to pay a proper salary for that work for an 11-month period. That would be something that would come before us for discussion on June 8.

City Manager Charpentier agreed.

Councilmember Bier appreciates being able to look through all this tonight and it will help with conversations then.

Chair Martin stressed that the kind of representation allowed by Ms. Carreon’s presence at RICAPS meetings brings in knowledge and opportunities about grants and vice versa.

Councilmember Bier voiced concerns about if a committee member cannot go to a meeting and limited staffing may not allow for us to attend. She understands the importance and that was something that stood out to her. She is excited about transportation when we get there.

Mayor Boles was grateful that Vice Chair Meiman was able to attend but we cannot necessarily commit to having a committee member, a volunteer, to attend regularly during workdays.

Councilmember Bier asked if it was possible for one of the Councilmembers to do that.

Vice Chair Meiman stated RICAPS is made up of sustainability managers or other City staff.

City Councilmembers do not generally take part in these meetings, nor do City committee members. RICAPS was being kind to allow a volunteer member of the community to participate but she has been glad to do it for the past couple of years. She stated it is a wealth of information and resources about what is happening.

Councilmember Beckmeyer asked if the RICAPS agendas are public.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if it has to be recorded.

City Manager Charpentier stated no, it is a C/CAG program consisting of sustainability staff meeting. The presence of Councilmembers may change the atmosphere of the meeting. It would be atypical to have non-agency staff on a regular basis.

Councilmember Beckmeyer asked about ways to monitor the subject matter.

Vice Chair Meiman stated the meetings are held on Zoom and in person quarterly. The Zoom meetings are not recorded.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if there are minutes of those meetings.

City Manager Charpentier does not think so as it mainly involves staff brainstorming, sometimes doing multi-jurisdictional applications and how to deliver these projects. If it is a matter of funding applications, he can reach out to their staff and have them send them to us, including

2.b
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 8 May 26, 2026
funding applications available for public agencies and rebates that are available on the consumer level. They can use Connect With Pacifica or other channels to distribute the consumer-based rebates or applications.

Mayor Boles stated the other item was the website which is being updated by staff. She asked if website updates have to be done by staff.

City Manager Charpentier stated City staff would do that, adding that committee members could write or text a narrative that could be inserted.

Vice Chair Meiman stated a CARC member could create the content and pass it along to staff members and then they would need to be approved for upload.

Mayor Boles thinks this is something Council directed but, in the future, committees and commissions will be presenting work plan concepts to Council earlier in February before Council’s Strategic Goal Setting and it can factor into the budget discussions every year.

Vice Chair Meiman referred to packet page 157, Item II-B: Home Electrification Permitting Process.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to “support recommendations to streamline permitting processes and ease zoning restrictions related to heat pump placement”. She stated it sounds like there is a sense that the zoning regulations make heat pump water heater installation difficult, and she asked if she is reading it correctly.

Vice Chair Meiman agreed, adding in other jurisdictions that has apparently been a barrier.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if that has to do with setback requirements, from a side perspective or rear perspective.

Vice Chair Meiman agreed, adding all of the above.

Vice Mayor Wright thinks it merits a look to make sure where there are potential setback conflicts and consider fire codes, particularly on the side setbacks to protect neighbors.

Vice Chair Meiman agreed that it is complicated.

Mayor Boles stated this is something CARC wants to work on and understand what the restrictions might be to limit the locations.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if it is likely we will receive a number of recommendations from them about bike charging plug locations and, on new construction projects, charging-ready circuits being involved and other kind of code changes, such as making setback requirements exclude solar carports.

Vice Chair Meiman stated potentially.

Vice Mayor Wright stated he would love to have garages with circuits ready for car chargers across Pacifica.

Vice Chair Meiman understood that the CalGreen Building Standards are mandated.

2.b
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 9 May 26, 2026
Mayor Boles stated that the way this is written focuses on making it easier for a homeowner who wants to do these improvements, getting a permit more quickly and reducing the burden.

Vice Chair Meiman agreed, with the understanding that safety, inspection, etc. are all very important.

Mayor Boles asked if in their review and language for the first year to try to take some of the burden away from staff, i.e. looking at best practices in other cities.

Vice Chair Meiman agreed.

Councilmember Bier feels the timeframe needs to be extended, possibly to 2028.

Vice Mayor Wright asked for possible flexibility in the timeline.

Mayor Boles asked what specific kind of direction should Council be giving.

City Manager Charpentier thought, on the one hand, the flexibility would be appreciated and, on the other hand, we want to be able to manage expectations and how do we prioritize core services, legally mandated services, and discretionary.

Mayor Boles referred to the subtasks in the workplan and asked about direction to staff.

Chair Martin asked if the intention is to revise the tasks and subtasks with verbiage and making them more achievable for staff and for CARC members.

Mayor Boles agreed.

Chair Martin stated that they understand there would be cuts and asked procedurally about redlining portions of the workplan or amending expectations.

Mayor Boles thinks the only sentence that gives her pause is “support recommendations to streamline permitting processes and ease zoning restrictions” because that is not defined yet. If that can be “research recommendations,” then when they come back again, they can talk about the specific a little bit more as part of next year’s work plan.

Councilmember Bier would be comfortable if we extend the timeframe.

Chair Martin thinks the tasks and subtasks for the workplan are for the year 2026-27.

Mayor Boles added that this is a timeline that they want to start these things, not necessarily wrap up.

Vice Chair Meiman thought it would be fine to revise to “research recommendations”.

Councilmember Beckmeyer asked how does this potential change in zoning relate to other zoning reviews that we are already planning to do and where does that fit in. She knows we have some zoning that needs updating and where is that going to fit in staff’s work plan already and how would this piece align or not align with that.

2.b
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 10 May 26, 2026
Mayor Boles added zoning code modernization in general is on the planning staff work plan.

Committee Member Langille thought the main issue is a small number of houses and, if it comes down to the air district requiring more heat pump systems, HVAC systems, to be implemented, then things might change. It is an iterative process and they do not have that information now and she thinks it is a lower number of heat pump systems.

Mayor Boles thinks a change in the zoning code, regardless of the number of properties, is a certain amount of work. She stated, if they are willing to change that language, she is happy with all of these.

Councilmember Beckmeyer asked if the task to “conduct outreach and education for residents and contractors” can be done in conjunction with Pacifica’s Environmental Family.

Vice Chair Meiman agreed.

Councilmember Espinosa thinks PCE recommends the contractor if someone wants to change the heat pump, and it is easier for them to do their own research and contact the contractor.

Vice Mayor Wright supported all of these goals but cannot be too specific about how many staff resources we can offer at this time.

Mayor Boles agreed, adding that we are all very committed to the work they are doing.

Mayor Boles stated she did not see a reference to REACH codes and trying to move to buildings to more electric which is something Council directed at Goal Setting. It also is going to take some planning staff time to work out, but she hopes that is something they all can be involved in as well, as she knows it is important for electrification sites.

Vice Chair Meiman agreed they could add that in the building electrification section.

Mayor Boles added we will learn more again on June 8 whether there is capacity for staff to be working on that.

Vice Chair Meiman agreed, adding in the RICAPS meeting today, they did offer support to cities with REACH code analysis.

Vice Mayor Wright stated it would be nice to slowly implement EV infrastructure and load capacity, figuring out the best way forward for that, and he sought some clarity and advice from the CARC members regarding developing an EV Readiness Plan.

Vice Chair Meiman and Member Langille stated they would leverage whatever resources that the State or County has and local groups as PCE, etc.

Mayor Boles thought language such as “research,” “support,” and “partner” were okay but had concerns about possibly “developing an EV Readiness Plan” as she has no idea what is involved in that.

Vice Chair Meiman stated that they are just starting to understand what an EV readiness plan is and it is a big lift. If we want to achieve our goals, we want to have approximately 540 EV chargers across the City, both public and private, so they need a plan for that.

2.b
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 11 May 26, 2026
Councilmember Beckmeyer asked if there is a way to find what our citizens have been doing through a FlashVote survey on EV readiness at their homes. She does not know if there is a data source somewhere.

Vice Chair Meiman stated not yet, but she was in a meeting a week or two ago and there is an organization in Marin all about EV infrastructure and they are trying to make their way to work with organizations down the peninsula and she will be reaching out to them.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if they are planning on doing any analysis of where the grid will no longer support any more electric cars.

Vice Chair Meiman stated, at some point, yes, and they are just getting started in this effort.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated we connect with our PG&E and other agencies. She referred to CalGreen Tier 2 EV charging requirements and asked what they are.

Vice Chair Meiman understands that CalGreen Tier 2 EV charging says that new construction has to be EV ready, with the power ready for level 2 charging which is 240 volts and 30 amps, and this is a mandatory requirement.

Mayor Boles stated the CalGreen tier was discussed at length as part of our Building Code cycle updates and we are not allowed to go beyond what the Building Code requires now. She thinks “supporting the implementation of EV charging requirements” may be taking out what the specifics are until we know what is allowed. She stated Tier 2 might not be required. There are different tiers of CalGreen and there is the basic requirement and, if you want to go above, cities in the past adopt REACH Codes and call for something stricter. She is not sure we can do that.

Vice Chair Meiman stated she is not reading this as extending beyond the requirements, but reading it as “support implementation,” meaning outreach to the community to let them know about it, getting with stakeholders who are in this arena to help figure out ways to support it, etc.

Vice Mayor Wright thought having some information available about load management and different control systems on our website would be helpful.

Mayor Boles stated that there were some vendors at PCE’s recent event during Climate Week that she attended that do exactly that. Whatever we can do to help people learn that they do not need to upgrade their panels, that saves money and allows more of this to happen.

Councilmember Beckmeyer sees that as part of EV education and outreach.

Mayor Boles stated, in speaking with PCE reps, we as a city are also supposed to work on a fleet electrification plan for City vehicles. She thinks that needs to come into effect fairly soon.

City Manager Charpentier stated that there are State mandates to buy more clean vehicles with every vehicle purchase you do and the mandates increase every year. He was not aware that they had to do a specific plan but we can look into that and see if that is mandated as well.

Mayor Boles stated PCE has been working with all the other cities in the county but not Pacifica yet. They can help us create that plan and find funding for City vehicles.

2.b
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 12 May 26, 2026
Chair Martin stated there is a map that Ms. Carreon put together that shows where our work plan is and where the overlapping work items are. She does not think it is something they need to do, and it may already be in their work plan as part of the partnering.

Mayor Boles thinks it could be great as part of their communication as what the City is also doing among all departments.

Vice Mayor Wright appreciated the work they put into this work plan.

Mayor Boles referred to coastal resilience and wildfire resilience.

Vice Mayor Wright referred to “resilience through nature-based solutions” and asked how does that comport with BBIRP relating to beach nourishment and the sea wall.

Committee Member Langille stated nature-based is typically something that coexists with natural processes and tries to work with natural processes instead of hardening.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if the reef was included in the work.

Committee Member Langille thinks it could be. Part of it is the State has their guidelines for nature-based solutions. Technically, sea walls contribute to loss of beaches so that does not fit under the rubric of nature-based solutions.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if they would be actively working at cross purposes with the stated position of the City.

Committee Member Langille stated that this is all researched as part of the CARP and it is solutions that the State recommends.

Vice Mayor Wright stated our LCLUP has both a combination of armoring and nature-based solutions and that is the official position of the city and what he is seeing here in conflict with that and that is the basis of his question.

Mayor Boles stated that some of the points identify and collaborate with stakeholders related to shoreline resilience and nature-based solutions and that could be both.

Vice Mayor Wright stated that we have a plan and it is not exclusively nature-based solutions and we do have an obligation to support our community.

Committee Member Langille stated this is all flowing from the approved CARP, and their recommendation was nature-based solutions. She stated that this one is a great example of leveraging local resources because of the organizations. For example, the Pacifica Land Trust applied for a grant with the Coastal Conservancy which one of the qualifiers is that it is a naturebased solution. She thinks there is funding for a sea wall and nature-based solutions and they do not conflict.

Vice Mayor Wright concluded it is not an exclusion of one or the other.

Committee Member Langille thinks they are fortunate to have the Land Trust who applied for the funding for the planning stage and they are continuing to present those ideas to the public and get feedback; at the end of the year, they are going to submit their proposal to the Coastal

2.b
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 13 May 26, 2026
Conservancy and hopefully qualify for money for one of those solutions, but it has to be a viable solution and something that the City would approve and work with the Land Trust. This was one of those great solutions where they can leverage someone who has already applied for a grant and the City is in sync with that potential outcome. Obviously, it has to be consistent with the LCLUP and the City.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if they have considered also looking into any studies on what the potential negative effects of taking sand away from our coastline and beaches and how we can resume that natural flow of sand on our beach.

Mayor Boles thinks, in the first item, Pacifica Land Trust is missing, which would be the agency looking at the nature-based solutions.

Councilmember Bier stated Pacifica Land Trust could be included in “support grant writing efforts” and “citywide collaboration with stakeholders”.

Committee Member Langille agreed and stated it can include other stakeholders.

Mayor Boles added the Beach Coalition does the planting of the dunes.

Committee Member Langille stated, to be practical, that is their goal now.

Councilmember Bier tied it back who is doing the tasks to our staffing discussions.

Mayor Boles thinks there is overlap with the staff work plan. Our Local Coastal Plan and the Coastal Commission are prioritizing nature-based solutions wherever they can happen. They are not appropriate for every location. She thinks a lot of the engagement and collaborating with stakeholders could help the City because all of our adaptation planning work is to come.

Our LCLUP took out all the adaptation strategies for the different parts of town and that is the work we need to start doing and visioning with the community about what we want and what are the pathways over time.

Councilmembers Beckmeyer and Bier agreed and thought it has to be done in concert with staff, not separate from it.

Committee Member Langille agreed that they are here to support what the staff direction is and they want to do that the best way they can and whatever feedback.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referenced “citywide collaboration with stakeholders to identify and consider nature-based solutions throughout adaptation and shoreline planning processes” and stated it sounds like work outside the scope of staff. It is staff’s domain and her concern is that this sounds like competing or at cross purposes vs. collaborating on it together. She is not sure we are ready to collaborate at this point while we are doing research. She thinks we need to give staff a minute to develop the work that Council directed them to do.

Committee Member Langille stated the last part, “shoreline planning process,” was supposed to be removed. She stated that their goal is to work with the City staff and staff direction. The first part was coastal resilience and the second part was wildfire resilience, but they are happy to make whatever edits they are comfortable with.

Councilmember Beckmeyer suggested striking that whole sentence.

2.b
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 14 May 26, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright thinks it is important to keep a large part of the emphasis on fire.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated it is work that people do on their own property. We need to educate the public about what they need to do in taking care of their property.

Vice Mayor Wright added with list of best practices.

Committee Member Langille stated, because they are starting out this process, she does not know what the City has or has not mandated.

Councilmember Beckmeyer believes it is the education component that we are focusing on at this time, not policy.

Committee Member Langille agreed but asked what is the defensible space.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated our Fire recommends five feet. It is not a policy that Council adopted.

Vice Mayor Wright thinks it is also part of some insurance recommendations with the five feet and he would not be surprised to see that distance change.

Mayor Boles stated we updated the fire maps and her understanding is, starting this year, we have some properties in the high fire hazard severity zones and her recollection is that property owners will need to start doing these things in those areas. She thinks the Fire Department is communicating globally to everyone in the City but there might be more outreach to the people who are in those areas.

Councilmember Beckmeyer added those who are adjacent to those areas.

Councilmember Bier asked if we should come back to the subtasks at hand here.

Chair Martin suggested to strike bullet point 8 and keep bullet point 7 covering fire awareness.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to food recovery programs. She stated that the City had to adopt policies related to the removal or prevention of edible food going into the waste stream.

The City contracted with some group in the county for that purpose and asked who did we sign on with, what was the keynote, what was the scope of the work, and how much does it cost us.

City Manager Charpentier stated we will look into it and see if there was a recent annual report.

Chair Martin stated that the goal this year is to map it out and see what is going on today, i.e. do an evaluation to see what is our food waste, is anything going to donation, how are we recovering it, how are we distributing it, etc. That is what their subcommittee wanted to work on this year, as well as collaborating with those folks in the City to see what is next. There may also be some community outreach in terms of reducing, reusing, repairing, and recovering.

She stated there are State reporting requirements for climate action areas and we have not talked about that in any of our meetings yet. They probably should identify what those necessities are and at a minimum those should make it in here too.

2.b
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 15 May 26, 2026
Mayor Boles stated we are not committing to any staff work here, just CARC researching what options are out there to do a better job and not have as much food waste.

Chair Martin added they could report back with their understanding.

Councilmember Bier added potentially to draft the food recovery program.

City Manager Charpentier wanted to be clear that we are completely compliant with all mandatory State reporting requirements.

Councilmember Beckmeyer feels the compliance and reporting is done by the subcontractor but she does not remember exactly who they are and how much they cost.

Chair Martin wanted to identify if that is a State reporting requirement which would relate to a climate action goal and thus mark it somewhere.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to “draft a pilot recovery program, outlined and identified participating businesses and organizations”.

Chair Martin stated that they know that will not happen this year.

Chair Martin suggested “consider best practice for recovery programs”.

Councilmember Beckmeyer liked that.

Mayor Boles suggested amending the last bullet point to “support City long-term food recovery programming”.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to transportation and mobility, Item 2F.

Chair Martin stated most of the tasks are in process so they would not be a heavy lift. She referred to “Develop communications strategies to promote transit options,” which may leverage County strategies.

Councilmember Bier suggested referring to Commute.org.

Chair Martin referred to “coordinate with PPD” which would allow an option to be consulted on.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated the work that is happening on this now is through Safe Routes to Schools.

Mayor Boles stated that PB&R is doing some research too. She stated it looked like it would be helpful for CARC to connect with PB&R and avoid duplicative work.

Chair Martin stated it relates to the CARP to try to reduce vehicle miles traveled and encouraging bikes. She is okay with removing it.

Councilmember Beckmeyer thinks the concern is non-duplicating efforts, so how do we make it more collaborative.

2.b
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 16 May 26, 2026
Mayor Boles suggested taking police off but clarified whether CARC would be involved with ebike safety or just promoting biking in general.

Chair Martin stated it is fine to remove that. She stated that they still have to advocate for infrastructure projects such as bike locking stations. She stated they will be looking out for grants and advocating.

Mayor Boles stated staff was pointing out and she has been advocating for a TDM plan for a while and she knows that there are some grant funding that was brought to their attention specifically for Pacifica. Sometimes, even if the grants are there, we do not have staff capacity to apply and do the work. We have to leave some flexibility.

Chair Martin asked City Manager if committee members are allowed to write grants and help with the grant writing and then submit them to staff for review and potential submission.

City Manager Charpentier stated it depends on the grant, but typically we would like them to be staff or Council initiated and we are very careful about the commitment of local match as well as staffing resources. A lot of the challenge with many of the things in this plan and in all work plans is the staffing capacity. He stated that is part of the prioritization that occurs. Part of it is a timing issue and it is a herculean effort to get to this point on paper and in this conversation. It came at a time right before a difficult budget discussion and this is part of the process.

Mayor Boles stated that we need to do a time check. She thought they would be done by 11:00.

Councilmembers Beckmeyer and Bier agreed.

Councilmember Bier stated the City does have some projects in, like for the TDA grant.

Mayor Boles asked how that gets communicated with all of Council and the committee.

Councilmember Bier stated BPAC is working on scoring all of them. She stated that she should have announced the City applied at the last meeting.

Mayor Boles thought this is something that staff would know and they could tell the committee that the City has applied for this grant.

Chair Martin detailed the tasks and subtasks for the urban forestry goals.

Mayor Boles thinks all of these are Council priorities and the arborist would be nice but she does not know if we can commit to that now. She stated, in talking with City Manager, the loophole language seems very easy but it will need some staff analysis to see if there are implications beyond those two words in the document. She does not think we are committing to two month timeline now.

City Manager Charpentier agreed, adding that ordinance amendments just by their process take longer than two months. It is part of the strategic priorities. The other thing worth noting is Urban Forestry Plan which we plan to kick off in the fall and it would engage this committee.

Once adopted, that event would become the foundational policy document approved by Council related to urban forestry.

2.b
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 17 May 26, 2026
Mayor Boles stated it will be great to have all of them working on that as they hire a consultant and bring that forward.

City Manager Charpentier stated we currently view the Urban Forestry Plan and tree ordinance as separate processes, but once we have a consultant, they may have some ideas for the ordinance as well that may filter into it.

Chair Martin asked if we are waiting until the consultant is on board.

City Manager Charpentier stated no, we will probably get started before then, as it is a larger and more involved process.

Chair Martin thanked them for their time and appreciated the dialogue.

Mayor Boles and Councilmember Bier thanked all of them.

RESULT: NO VOTE REQUIRED

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Vice Mayor Wright encouraged Councilmembers participating on regional committees to carpool together.

Councilmember Bier stated she and Vice Mayor Wright are in the middle of scoring applications as part of BPAC. In the upcoming meeting, they will present all the projects.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated she has been very busy with school.

Councilmember Bier added that she will be presenting on a panel with retired City Manager Kevin Woodhouse in October at the ICMA Conference. It is called “Armchair Therapist” and will recognize mental health issues for City Managers. It is important for us to understand the limitations of our city managers and also for them to recognize the signs and symptoms of anxiety or depression so they can all get the resources they need.

Councilmember Beckmeyer enjoyed the mental health for elected officials event that was in Redwood City.

Mayor Boles agreed. She gave a few updates on past housing events. One was the HEART member agency and annual meeting. One program they are eliminating is the home buyers program. They are going to focus on education for first time home buyers instead. There is a new Doorway Housing Portal that people can access to find out about affordable units and placement. They have staff working with cities as well. One of the things they are asking cities to look at is possibly developers donating land as another way to meet their requirement. Those are things they will talk about it as it comes back to us. HEART started a new mobile home purchase program and they will be presenting on that sometime this fall. Their annual event is October 15 at the Devil’s Canyon Brewery. She also went with Deputy Director Christiansen to the Housing Leadership Council yearly housing event that was also in Redwood City. She stated that Congressman Liccardo is hopeful that the federal government is looking at housing and looking at a bill that will have greater tax credits. The State is still working on a housing bond and we will know in June if it qualifies for the ballot. She stated that the Marine Science

2.b
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 18 May 26, 2026
Institute had Kids Ocean Day last week and they brought 259 kids here from five different schools and they invited Pacifica schools. They have been doing this in San Francisco for a long time and PB&R staff did a great job coordinating with them to be able to bring them here to Linda Mar Beach for the first time and the Beach Coalition came out too and helped with organizing the beach cleanup. It was a successful day and it was amazing talking with some of the kids. They were from San Jose, East Palo Alto, Palo Alto and San Francisco schools. She is hoping that continues. She said Councilmember Beckmeyer and she were at the Memorial Day Event at the American Legion yesterday and it was beautiful.

Councilmember Beckmeyer also visited Public Works Open House with Councilmember Espinosa.

Councilmember Bier thanked City Manager Charpentier for all the work he is doing to get to know our community and showing up for committees and commissions. It is appreciated.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated we will be seeing information coming out from North County Water District about a rate increase. Her biggest takeaway from it is that people who have low usage and high access fees. NCCWD has rebalanced that. The study was about 200 pages long and is available on their website.

Councilmember Espinosa was excited to see that as well. She also thanked City Manager Charpentier for coming to the Homeowners Association for Fairmont. They were very happy with him coming to say hello. When he told her that he wanted to meet with the community, she was sold. She appreciated it.

City Manager Charpentier stated it was his pleasure to get to know so many engaged residents and he will continue that this week with the PRC luncheon tomorrow and PB&R Commission.

Mayor Boles thanked him so much.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Charpentier thanked the committee and commission members who presented tonight and he appreciated all that they do.

ADJOURN
Mayor Boles adjourned the meeting at 10:39 p.m.

Transcribed by Barbara Medina, Public Meeting Stenographer.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
__________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor

2.b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 5-26-2026 City Council Regular Meeting (6278 : Approval of Minutes)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
8/24/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the End of Beach Boulevard
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

STAFF CONTACT:

Ethan Maro, Assistant Civil Engineer
650-418-4297
[email protected]
Melissa Tigbao, P.E., Director of Public Works
650-501-6016
[email protected]
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On January 22, 2016, the Director of Emergency Services proclaimed the existence of a local emergency along the Pacifica coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard due to El Nino storm activity. Extreme wave heights for extended periods of time caused top-of-bluff retreat at several locations along the Pacifica coast and damage to City infrastructure. Since this date, the Director of Emergency Services has proclaimed the existence of other local emergencies along this same stretch of coastline. These emergencies are described below:
• The January 22nd, 2016 storm caused a failure of the Beach Blvd. seawall near Santa Maria Avenue, which has been repaired.
• The January 22nd, 2016 storm also caused the undermining of an eight-foot diameter storm drain outfall and concrete headwall for the discharge of Milagra Creek into the Pacific Ocean near 700 Palmetto Avenue from the. The project was completed on April 24, 2023.
• During the 2016-2018 storms, the 300 & 400 blocks of Esplanade Avenue experienced episodic bluff erosion. The bluff erosion has progressed to a point where the erosion is now threatening public infrastructure and utilities.
• On December 16th, 2020, a failure of the Beach Blvd. seawall near Santa Rosa Avenue and the Pier created a large void (approx. 25’ w x 25’ l ). The repairs were completed by February 22, 2021.
3 Packet Pg. 61
Pacifica City Council 2
August 24, 2026
• On December 29th, 2020, another void ( approx. 10’ w x 15’ l) around 150-200 feet north of the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Santa Rosa Avenue. The repairs were completed by February 2021.
• On January 14th, 2021, a combination of high tides and large waves damaged a fortyfoot section of the Pacifica Municipal Pier’s west facing deck and concrete railing. The railing repair was beyond what had been funded for the project, the City pivoted to do further inspections on the pier before a sizable investment is made in fixing the rails, since it was prudent for the City to understand the full needs of the pier. The 2023 Pier Condition Assessment Report has been finalized and is able to be viewed at www.cityofpacifica.org/pier. A rough order of magnitude of up to $20 million for the repairs is for design and permitting. The structural engineers recommended limiting public access on the pier to approximately half of the main pier deck until repairs to the more severely damaged areas.
• In November of 2023, a failure behind the seawall was discovered at the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Salada Ave. A void (approx. 2’-7’ w x 40’ l) was found behind the seawall and was repaired with concrete and cement slurry. The repairs were completed by the end of December 2023.
• On December 29th, 2023, another failure (approx. 300 sf) behind the seawall was discovered at Beach Blvd. and San Jose Ave. and was temporarily plugged. The repairs were completed by January 10, 2024. This also caused damage to the Milagra storm drain outfall and left substantial sand deposits on the Beach Boulevard Prominade and on the southern Beach Boulevard rock revetment.
• In March of 2024, City staff received an Emergency Coastal Development Permit (ECDP) from the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for removal of the substantial sand deposits left on Beach Boulevard Promenade and southern rock revetment as well as for the repair of the damage to the Milagra outfall. Repairing the outfall and removal of the sand on the Beach Boulevard Promenade and removal of the sand from the southern Beach Boulevard Rock Revetment was completed by mid-May of 2024. • In May 2024, a sink hole (approx. 5’ w x 25’ l) was discovered behind the seawall on Beach Blvd. to the north of Santa Maria. The hole was repaired through an emergency contractor.
• In November 2024, a new sink hole (approx. 8’ w x 30’ l) was discovered behind the seawall on Beach Blvd. between Carmel Ave and Santa Maria Ave. The hole was repaired through an emergency contractor by December 16, 2024. • On November 13th, 2025, two sink holes (approx. 3’ w x 16’ l and 8’ w x 10’ l) were discovered behind the seawall on Beach Blvd and between Santa Maria Avenue and San Jose Avenue. Another sink hole (approx. 12’ w x 16’ l) was discovered behind the seawall near Chit Chat Cafe while making repairs to the first 2 sink holes. All sinkholes were repaired through an emergency contractor by December 16, 2025. Revetment 300' south of the Chit Chat Cafe had moved and left the seawall exposed. The restacking of the revetment was performed by an emergency contractor by February 9th, 2026. • On June 4th, 2026, observed cracking, separation, and displacement of the concrete walkway and structural elements near the abutment and Chit Chat café located on the Pier required immediate shutdown of both the café and Pier. Due to increased separation, the Pier is now closed until further notice. Due to the likelihood of collapse, 3 Packet Pg. 62
Pacifica City Council 3
August 24, 2026
Chit Chat café was demolished on June 9th, 2026. The City began short-term stabilization by placing rock revetment around the abutment.

The City Council first ratified this proclamation (Attachment A) at its regular meeting of January 25, 2016. Since that date, additional damage has occurred along Beach Boulevard and Esplanade Avenue as noted above.

Pursuant to Government Code section 8630(c), the City Council must review the need for continuing the local emergency at least every 60 days until the City Council terminates the local emergency. Conditions of local emergency still exist since the City Council first acted to declare a local emergency on January 25, 2016, and since that time staff have brought the continuance of Proclamation confirming the existence of local emergency exists within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard every 30 days with July 13th, 2026 being the most recent.

The City is using a combination of city staff, contractors, and consultants to manage the discussed emergency work. Staff will bring recommendations to the Council to end the emergency designation for projects on the list once conditions stabilize and the projects are no longer in need of the emergency designation.

The City Manager recommends that the City Council make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ORIGINATED BY:

Engineering
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to End of Beach Blvd (PDF)
3 Packet Pg. 63
"ATTACHMENT 1"

3.a
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Attachment A: Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to End of Beach Blvd (6247 :
"ATTACHMENT 1"

3.a
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Attachment A: Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to End of Beach Blvd (6247 :

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
8/24/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Pacifica Municipal Pier and the Order of Director of Emergency Services Relating to Temporary Closure of the Pier RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Accept report and make a determination that conditions of a local emergency continue to exist at the Pacifica Municipal Pier.

STAFF CONTACT:

Sean Charpentier, City Manager
(650) 738-7409
[email protected]
Melissa Tigbao, P.E., Director of Public Works
(650) 501-6016
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On June 5, 2026, the City Manager, acting in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed the existence of a local emergency pursuant to PMC 4-2.05(a) and executed the "Proclamation of the Existence of a Local Emergency at the Pacifica Municipal Pier ("Proclamation"). On June 8, 2026, the City Council of the City of Pacifica adopted Resolution No. 33-2026 to ratify the Proclamation of local emergency due to Pacifica Municipal Pier (Attachment 1). The City’s Proclamation was sent to San Mateo County Offices of Emergency Services and the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) and allows the City to seek state and federal funds relating to the emergency.

This proclamation of local emergency was based on the following findings.

On Thursday, June 4, 2026, Public Works staff were notified of damages to the Pacifica Municipal Pier. Public Works Engineering and Field Services staff responded to the notification and inspected the Pacifica Municipal Pier and found cracking, separation, and displacement of the concrete walkway and structural elements near the abutment and Chit Chat Café (“Conditions”).

Public Works Field Services staff closed off the Pier and abutment area from public access due to the unstable and unsafe Conditions. The City’s Chief Building Official also issued a “red-tag” for the Chit Chat Café, as the restaurant is unsafe for occupancy. The utilities to Chit Chat Café were cut and capped off. The preliminary structural engineering assessment from the City’s consultants revealed there was extensive damage which would likely require major reconstruction of the abutment. On June 9, 2026, the City demolished the Chit Chat Café due to 4 Packet Pg. 66
Pacifica City Council 2
August 24, 2026
the continued settling of the abutment to prevent the structure from falling into the ocean, which would have resulted in insignificant environmental cleanup costs. The City began a short-term stabilization by placing rock revetment around the abutment. City is working with the City’s structural engineers to determine a suitable stabilization plan until a permanent solution can be found. The Pier will remain closed until it can be determined the facility is safe for public use.

Since declaring the local emergency, the City has taken the following steps to stabilize the Pier:

The City completed placement of temporary rock revetment around the pier abutment to provide temporary support and slow its continued settlement. The City continues to monitor the condition of the Pier and is pursuing additional emergency stabilization measures intended to provide interim support for the abutment and first deck of the Pier.

The abutment and first deck of the Pier remain structurally unstable, and the Pier continues to be unsafe for public access. Additional emergency stabilization work remains necessary to reduce the risk of further structural movement.

As part of the emergency stabilization efforts, the City issued an emergency Request for Proposals (RFP) for emergency stabilization work at the Pacifica Municipal Pier. The City received proposals in response to the RFP, and staff are currently preparing for a contract award. Staff expects to bring a ratification of contract award to the City Council as soon as execution is complete.

The conditions that caused the local emergency continue to exist and therefore Staff and the City Manager (Director of Emergency Services) recommend the continuation of the local emergency.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impacts associated with the emergency are covered under the Disaster Accounting Fund and no additional budget authority is necessary as sufficient funds have been previously approved in the Disaster Accounting Fund to pay for the demolition and other associated projects. Staff is also working with the city’s insurance firm to cover costs responding to this emergency. The continuation of the local emergency will facilitate the ability for the City to request resources including financial support and reimbursement from the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for costs incurred in preparation and/or response to the emergency ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Resolution No.33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier (PDF)
4 Packet Pg. 67

4.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Attachment A: Resolution No.33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier (6264 :

4.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Attachment A: Resolution No.33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier (6264 :

4.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Attachment A: Resolution No.33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier (6264 :

4.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Attachment A: Resolution No.33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier (6264 :

4.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Attachment A: Resolution No.33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier (6264 :

4.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Attachment A: Resolution No.33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier (6264 :

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
8/24/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Adoption of Resolution Ratifying and Approving City Manager / Director of Emergency Services’ approval of the Emergency Public Works Agreement (“Agreement”) with Power Engineering Construction Co. for the Emergency Investigation and Stabilization of the Pacifica Municipal Pier.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a resolution ratifying and approving the City Manager / Director of Emergency Services’ approval of an Emergency Public Works Agreement with Power Engineering Construction Co. for Emergency Investigation and Stabilization of the Pacifica Municipal Pier.

STAFF CONTACT:

Melissa Tigbao, P.E., Director of Public Works
(650) 501-6016
[email protected]
Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
(650) 501-6004
[email protected]
Sean Charpentier, City Manager
(650) 738-7409
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On June 4, 2026, significant cracking and settlement developed at the Pacifica Municipal Pier abutment and landside span. Public Works staff responded immediately, conducted an inspection, and observed cracking, separation, and displacement of the concrete walkway and structural elements near the abutment and Chit Chat Café. Given the observed damage and the potential risk to public safety, the City immediately closed the Pier, abutment, Pier Concession Building, public restrooms, and surrounding areas to public access.

On June 5, 2026, pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code 4-2.05(a), the City Manager proclaimed a local emergency and executed the "Proclamation of the Existence of a Local Emergency at the Pacifica Municipal Pier ("Proclamation"). On June 8, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 33-2026 ratifying the Proclamation of local emergency and the temporary closure of the Pier and adjacent beach area (Attachment 1). The City’s Proclamation was also shared with San Mateo County Offices of Emergency Services and the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) in support of the City’s efforts to seek State and federal assistance related to this emergency.

In the days following June 4, 2026, conditions at the Pier and abutment worsened. Following emergency authorization from the California Coastal Commission, the City demolished and 5 Packet Pg. 74
Pacifica City Council 2
August 24, 2026
removed the Chit Chat Café and adjacent public restrooms to protect public safety and prevent debris from entering the ocean. The City subsequently placed approximately 300 large boulders, totaling approximately 900 tons, around the abutment as an interim protective measure.

Additional investigation and stabilization work is necessary to evaluate the Pier and abutment and to guard against the potential for further movement that could affect the Pier structure, Beach Boulevard, and adjacent public infrastructure and utilities. The Pier remains closed to the public as a precaution, and the City continues to monitor site conditions.

Emergency Procurement and Agreement with Power Engineering Construction Co.

Given the continuing emergency conditions and the need to undertake stabilization work without the delay associated with a traditional public works procurement, the City proceeded under the emergency contracting authority provided by California Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050. These provisions authorize emergency procurement without delays associated with the competitive bidding process when immediate action is necessary to respond to a sudden and unexpected occurrence that poses a clear and imminent danger to life, health, property, or essential public services.

On July 14, 2026, as part of the City’s evaluation of how best to address the evolving conditions at the Pier, the City issued an emergency Request for Proposals (RFP) for investigation and stabilization services covering the Pier and adjacent public infrastructure. The RFP was provided to three qualified marine construction firms to inform the City’s assessment of potential technical approaches, contractor availability, constructability, and ability to mobilize the specialized resources and equipment necessary for the emergency work. On July 29, 2026, the City received one proposal from Power Engineering Construction Co. (Power) of Alameda, California. Power is an experienced marine contractor that has previously performed significant work on the Pacifica Municipal Pier.

Since receipt of the proposal, the City has worked diligently with Power and with its technical, regulatory, and insurance advisors to evaluate the proposed emergency stabilization approach and develop the enclosed agreement. This coordination has included the technical expertise of GHD, Inc., the City’s engineering consultant, together with the City’s other technical and insurance advisors, CalOES, and the federal and State regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the work. This multidisciplinary review has informed the proposed scope, sequencing, constructability, regulatory approach, and contractual provisions for the emergency work.

Following review of Power’s proposal and subsequent technical discussions regarding site conditions, constructability, sequencing, and immediate stabilization needs, City staff negotiated the enclosed Emergency Public Works Agreement. The Agreement authorizes investigation, engineering, construction, and stabilization activities reasonably necessary to respond to the emergency conditions affecting the Pier and adjacent public infrastructure.

Based on the current conditions and Power’s recommended construction sequencing, the initial work will prioritize “Phase 2: Pier Shoring” that will first install a temporary pile-and-beam shoring system to support the landside end of the Pier’s first span at Bent B, reducing the risk of further movement and providing safe access for subsequent work. Immediately following the shoring work, “Phase 1A: Beach Boulevard and abutment protection” will install a King Pile COMBI wall around the abutment approach to protect Beach Boulevard and its utilities, together with piles that establish a working platform for access to, and further evaluation of, the abutment and adjacent structure.

The precise sequencing, scope, and extent of the work - including the extent to which portions 5 Packet Pg. 75
Pacifica City Council 3
August 24, 2026
of the Pier and abutment are ultimately repaired, further stabilized, or removed - will continue to be informed by field conditions, engineering evaluation, regulatory requirements, and the need to advance critical work ahead of the winter storm season. Under the agreement, the contractor shall not commence work unless authorized by a written phase authorization or task order issued by the City. This approach allows the City to authorize and manage the emergency work incrementally as the scope, costs, and funding for each phase are further defined.

The City is concurrently coordinating with the applicable federal and State regulatory agencies to secure the authorizations necessary to advance the emergency stabilization work. In parallel, GHD, Inc. continues to advance engineering work to inform subsequent rehabilitation of the Pier and abutment.

Because the emergency conditions require the City to proceed with stabilization activities without delay, the City Manager has executed the enclosed Agreement pursuant to the City’s emergency contracting authority. Staff recommend that the City Council ratify the City Manager’s execution of the Emergency Public Works Agreement with Power Engineering Construction Co. for the Emergency Investigation and Stabilization of the Pacifica Municipal Pier, dated August 20, 2026.

Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22050, the City Council should review the emergency action at each regularly scheduled meeting until the action is terminated and will terminate the emergency contracting authority at the earliest date conditions warrant.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Emergency Public Works Agreement provides a framework for the phased investigation and stabilization work necessary to respond to the evolving conditions at the Pier. The ultimate cost of the emergency work will depend on the results of ongoing technical investigations, field conditions, regulatory requirements, construction sequencing, and the scope of stabilization measures determined to be necessary as the work progresses. Consistent with the phased structure of the Agreement, work is authorized incrementally, and costs will continue to be refined as each phase of the emergency work is further developed. Additional detail regarding estimated costs will be provided to the City Council as work progresses.

The City is actively pursuing reimbursement of its expenditures from multiple funding sources.

These include the City’s property insurance coverage and State and federal disaster-assistance programs, including the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) under the California Disaster Assistance Act and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The City’s property insurer has reviewed and approved the full scope of work under the Power Engineering Construction Co. Agreement. The City is coordinating with its insurer to obtain reimbursement and, where available, advance funding for eligible costs, and the insurer will continue to monitor the work and coordinate funding as the investigation and stabilization requirements evolve.

The City will also continue to pursue disaster-assistance reimbursement through Cal OES, including its previously submitted claim and the costs arising from the June 2026 emergency.

Continuation of the local emergency, which is being considered under separate Council action, will preserve the City’s ability to seek available resources and financial assistance from State and federal agencies, including Cal OES and FEMA, for eligible costs associated with the City’s response to the emergency.

Staff will continue to monitor project costs, available insurance proceeds, potential reimbursements, and existing budget authority as the emergency work progresses. If additional budget appropriations are required, staff will return to the City Council for consideration and 5 Packet Pg. 76
Pacifica City Council 4
August 24, 2026
approval through a future budget amendment.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Given the continuing emergency conditions at the Pier and the need to advance stabilization work without delay, staff has not identified a reasonable alternative that would adequately address the immediate public safety and infrastructure risks.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
City Manager's Office
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier (PDF)
Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL (PDF) 5 Packet Pg. 77
"ATTACHMENT 1"

5.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier [Revision 1]

5.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier [Revision 1]

5.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier [Revision 1]

5.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier [Revision 1]

5.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier [Revision 1]

5.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 33-2026 and Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding the Pacifica Municipal Pier [Revision 1] 1 RESOLUTION NO.__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA

RATIFYING AND APPROVING CITY MANAGER / DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES’ APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF THE EMERGENCY PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) WITH POWER ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION CO. FOR THE EMERGENCY INVESTIGATION AND

STABILIZATION OF THE PACIFICA MUNICIPAL PIER
WHEREAS, on June 4, 2026, significant cracking and settlement developed at the Pacifica Municipal Pier abutment and landside span. Public Works staff responded immediately, conducted an inspection, and observed cracking, separation, and displacement of the concrete walkway and structural elements near the abutment and Chit Chat Café, and immediately closed the Pier, abutment, Pier Concession Building, public restrooms, and surrounding areas to public access; and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2026, pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code 4-2.05(a), the City Manager proclaimed a local emergency and executed the “Proclamation of the Existence of a Local Emergency at the Pacifica Municipal Pier” (“Proclamation”), and on June 8, 2026, by a four-fifths vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 33-2026 ratifying the Proclamation of local emergency and temporary closure of the Pier and adjacent beach area; and WHEREAS, the City proceeded under the emergency contracting authority provided by California Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050 which authorize emergency procurement without delays associated with the competitive bidding process when immediate action is necessary to respond to a sudden and unexpected occurrence that poses a clear and imminent danger to life, health, property, or essential public services; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2026, the City issued an emergency Request for Proposals (RFP) for investigation and stabilization services covering the Pier and adjacent public infrastructure to three qualified marine contractors and on July 29, 2026, the City received one proposal from Power Engineering Construction Co. (“Power”) of Alameda, California; and WHEREAS, city staff negotiated the enclosed Emergency Public Works Agreement which authorizes investigation, engineering, construction, and stabilization activities reasonably necessary to respond to the emergency conditions affecting the Pier and adjacent public infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has executed the Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A, pursuant to the City’s emergency contracting authority; and WHEREAS, based on substantial evidence set forth in the record and minutes of this meeting, the City Council finds that the emergency conditions at the Pier will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids, and that the emergency action authorized herein is necessary to respond to the emergency; and
WHEREAS, the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, and property, and the City Council intends to continue to review the emergency action at each regularly scheduled meeting, by a four-fifths vote, until the action is terminated as required by Public Contract Code section 22050. "ATTACHMENT 2"

5.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica City Council 2 August 24, 2026
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pacifica, by a vote of not less than four-fifths of its members, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference, and the City Council adopts them as its findings.

2. The City Council hereby ratifies and approves the City Manager’s execution of the Emergency Public Works Agreement with Power Engineering Construction Co. for the Emergency Investigation and Stabilization of the Pacifica Municipal Pier, in substantially the same form as the Agreement attached as Exhibit A, subject to such minor, non-substantive changes as may be approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.

3. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to take such further actions and to execute such related documents, change orders, and amendments as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the emergency work and the intent of this Resolution, consistent with the City’s emergency contracting authority.

4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. • • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 24th day of August, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney

5.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 1 EMERGENCY PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT
SECTION 1

PARTIES AND RECITALS
This Emergency Public Works Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of August 25, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Pacifica, a municipal corporation and public agency organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (“City”), and Power Engineering Construction Co., a California corporation (“Contractor”).

The City and Contractor may each be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. The City owns and operates the Pacifica Pier and adjacent public infrastructure, including Beach Boulevard, pedestrian facilities, public utilities, and associated shoreline protection improvements.

B. Recent storm events, coastal processes, erosion, scour, and related conditions have resulted in damage, instability, and deterioration affecting portions of the Pacifica Pier and adjacent public infrastructure.

C. The City has determined that emergency conditions exist requiring immediate investigation, stabilization, and protection of public infrastructure to protect public health, safety, and welfare and to prevent further damage.

D. Pursuant to the City’s emergency contracting authority under applicable provisions of the California Public Contract Code and other applicable law, the City elected to procure emergency investigation, stabilization, engineering, and construction services without utilizing traditional competitive bidding procedures. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement is entered into pursuant to the City's emergency contracting authority under California Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050 and applicable law. By resolution adopted by no less than a four-fifths vote of its members, the City Council has found, based on substantial evidence set forth in the minutes of its meeting, that (i) an emergency exists within the meaning of Public Contract Code section 1102, in that a sudden and unexpected occurrence poses a clear and imminent danger requiring immediate action to prevent or mitigate the loss or impairment of life, health, property, or essential public services; (ii) the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property; and (iii) the emergency will not permit the delay that would result from a competitive solicitation for bids, and this action is necessary to respond to the emergency. The City Council shall review this emergency action at each regularly scheduled meeting until the action is terminated, and shall terminate the action at the earliest date that conditions warrant so that any remaining work may be completed by giving notice for bids to let contracts. Professional engineering services authorized under this Agreement are limited to those reasonably necessary to investigate, evaluate, stabilize, or otherwise respond to the emergency conditions giving rise to the Project and do not constitute a separate procurement of design services unrelated to the emergency response.

5.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 2 E. The City issued a Request for Proposals entitled:

Emergency Investigation and Stabilization Services. Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stabilization Project
(“RFP”) seeking qualified entities capable of responding to the emergency conditions and performing the required Work.

F. Contractor submitted a proposal in response to the RFP and represented that it possesses the qualifications, experience, personnel, equipment, licenses, and expertise necessary to perform the Work.

G. Based upon Contractor’s qualifications, technical approach, demonstrated emergency response capability, experience, schedule, proposed pricing, and overall value to the City, the City selected Contractor to perform the Work described in this Agreement.

H. The Parties acknowledge that the Project is intended to be performed on a phased basis, with specific portions of the Work authorized through written Phase Authorizations or Task Orders issued by the City.

I. The Parties acknowledge that portions of the Project may be eligible for reimbursement through emergency response and disaster recovery funding programs, including programs administered by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (“Cal OES”) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”). Contractor agrees to maintain records and comply with documentation requirements necessary to support potential reimbursement.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:

1.1 Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits
The foregoing Recitals are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement. The following documents are incorporated into this Agreement by reference:
• Exhibit A – General Contract Requirements;
• Exhibit B – Phase Authorization /Task Order Template; • Exhibit C – Payment and Cost Documentation Requirements; • Exhibit D – Insurance and Indemnification Requirements; • Exhibit E – FEMA / Cal OES Documentation and Compliance Requirements; • Exhibit F – Emergency Directive / Change Order Form
• Exhibit G – FEMA Federal Funding Contract Provisions

5.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 3 • Schedule 1-Contractor’s Proposal dated July 29, 2026, but only as to Section 03 (Technical Approach and Understanding of Project Challenges) thereof and solely to identify the Contractor’s technical scope and approach, and subject in all respects to Section 1.4 below; and
• Written Phase Authorizations and Task Orders issued by the City.

In the event of a conflict between the Agreement and any incorporated document, the order of precedence shall be as established in Section 2.2 of this Agreement.

1.2 No Authorization Without Written Direction
Contractor shall not commence any Work unless authorized in writing by the City through an executed Agreement, Phase Authorization, Task Order, or other written direction issued by an authorized City representative. Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate the City to authorize all phases of the Project, proceed with all contemplated improvements, or expend funds beyond amounts authorized by the City.

1.3 Emergency Nature of Project
The Parties acknowledge that the Work is being performed under emergency conditions requiring flexibility, timely decision-making, and coordination among the City, Contractor, regulatory agencies, utilities, and other stakeholders. The Parties further acknowledge that emergency conditions may require modifications to sequencing, scope, schedule, or construction methods. Any changes to authorized Work shall be documented in accordance with this Agreement.

1.4 Incorporation of Contractor’s Proposal; Non-Operative Terms The Contractor’s Proposal is incorporated solely to identify the Contractor’s technical scope and approach, and only as to Section 03 (Technical Approach and Understanding of Project Challenges) thereof. To the extent the Proposal contains any assumption, exclusion, qualification, exception, reservation, rate schedule or schedule of rates, payment term, markup, pricing total, bid item, or requested modification to this Agreement, such term is of no force or effect and does not modify, limit, or condition any obligation of the Contractor under this Agreement or any Exhibit. In any conflict between the Proposal and this Agreement, an Exhibit, or a Phase Authorization, this Agreement, the Exhibit, or the Phase Authorization controls.

Section 09 (Contract Exceptions) of the Proposal is not incorporated and is superseded in its entirety by this Agreement.

The complete Contractor’s Proposal is appended to this Agreement as Schedule 1 for reference and identification purposes only. Schedule 1 is not a Contract Document, is non-binding as to its terms, and none of the assumptions, exclusions, exceptions, reservations, rate schedule or schedule of rates, payment terms, markup, or pricing totals set forth in the Proposal shall have any contractual force or effect.

5.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 4 SECTION 2

DEFINITIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

2.1 Definitions
For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below.

Terms not defined herein shall have their ordinary meaning or shall be interpreted consistent with applicable public works contracting practices.
“Agreement” Means this Emergency Public Works Agreement, including all incorporated exhibits, attachments, Phase Authorizations, Task Orders, Change Orders, and other written amendments executed by the Parties.
“Cal OES” Means the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, or any successor agency responsible for administering applicable state emergency assistance programs. “Change Order” Means a written modification to the Agreement, Scope of Services, Compensation, Schedule, or other Contract Document executed or authorized in accordance with this Agreement.
“City” or “Owner” Means the City of Pacifica, including its authorized representatives, officers, employees, agents, and consultants acting within the scope of their authority. “Contract Documents” Means this Agreement and all documents incorporated herein, including:
• Exhibits;
• Contractor’s Proposal;
• Phase Authorizations;
• Task Orders;
• Change Orders;
• written directives issued by the City;
• applicable funding agency requirements; and
• other documents expressly incorporated into this Agreement. “Contractor” Means Power Engineering Construction Co., the entity entering into this Agreement with the City and responsible for performing the authorized Work. “Emergency Work” Means investigation, engineering, stabilization, construction, temporary measures, and related activities necessary to address emergency conditions affecting the Pacifica Pier and adjacent public infrastructure. Emergency Work may include temporary or permanent measures, as authorized by the City.

5.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 5 “FEMA” Means the Federal Emergency Management Agency or any successor federal agency administering applicable disaster assistance programs.
“Final Completion” Means completion of all authorized Work, correction of identified deficiencies, submission of required documentation, and acceptance of the Work by the City. “Owner’s Representative” Means the consultant or representative retained by the City to assist with project administration, technical review, cost evaluation, coordination, and other advisory services as designated by the City.
“Phase Authorization” Means a written authorization issued by the City identifying a specific portion of the Project authorized for performance, including applicable scope, schedule, and compensation.
“Project” Means the emergency investigation, stabilization, engineering, and related work associated with the Pacifica Pier and adjacent public infrastructure described in this Agreement. “Task Order” Means a written authorization issued by the City directing Contractor to perform specific Work, services, investigations, or activities within the scope of this Agreement. “Work” Means all labor, materials, equipment, engineering services, construction services, supervision, temporary facilities, documentation, and other activities required to complete the authorized Project in accordance with the Contract Documents.

2.2 Contract Documents and Order of Precedence
The Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Contractor shall perform the Work in accordance with all applicable Contract Documents.

In the event of a conflict between Contract Documents, the following order of precedence shall apply unless otherwise stated in a written amendment:

1. Executed Change Orders or written amendments to this Agreement;

2. This Agreement;

3. Phase Authorizations and Task Orders;

4. Written directives issued by the City;

5. Exhibits to this Agreement;

6. General Contract Requirements;

7. Federal Contract Provisions, if applicable;

8. Contractor’s Proposal, only as to the technical scope and approach incorporated under Section 1.4 and not otherwise; and

9. Reference documents provided with the RFP, including Schedule 1 (Contractor’s Proposal, reference copy).

5.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 6 Notwithstanding the foregoing, Contractor acknowledges that reference documents, including prior assessments, drawings, reports, and photographs provided by the City, are informational only and do not modify Contractor’s obligations under this Agreement.

2.3 Interpretation of Emergency Conditions
The Parties acknowledge that the Project involves emergency conditions that may require expedited decisions, modified sequencing, temporary measures, and adjustments to the Work as additional information becomes available. Nothing in this Section shall relieve Contractor of its obligations to perform the Work in accordance with applicable laws, permits, safety requirements, and the Contract Documents.

SECTION 3

SCOPE OF WORK AND PHASE AUTHORIZATIONS

3.1 General Scope of Work
Contractor shall perform the Work described in this Agreement, the RFP, Contractor’s Proposal, applicable Phase Authorizations, Task Orders, and other Contract Documents incorporated herein. The Work generally consists of emergency investigation, engineering services, stabilization, construction, and related activities necessary to protect the Pacifica Pier and adjacent public infrastructure, including Beach Boulevard, pedestrian facilities, public utilities, sewer infrastructure, shoreline improvements, and related facilities. Contractor shall furnish all labor, supervision, engineering services, materials, equipment, temporary facilities, temporary works, construction support, documentation, and incidentals necessary to complete the authorized Work, unless expressly identified as the responsibility of the City.

3.2 Professional Engineering Services
Where included within an authorized Phase Authorization or Task Order, Contractor shall provide professional engineering services necessary to support the Project. Such services may include evaluation of existing conditions, field investigations, engineering analysis, preparation of calculations, preparation of drawings and technical documents, construction support services, responses to technical questions, review of field conditions, preparation of record documentation, and other engineering services reasonably necessary to complete the authorized Work. All engineering services shall be performed under the responsible charge of a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of California. Contractor shall remain responsible for the accuracy, completeness, and adequacy of engineering documents prepared by Contractor.

3.3 Construction Services
Where authorized by the City, Contractor shall provide construction services necessary to complete the Work. Such services may include mobilization and demobilization, site preparation, public safety measures, temporary works, temporary stabilization, permanent stabilization, structural repairs, utility protection, material installation, testing and inspection coordination, restoration activities, and project closeout documentation. Contractor shall be solely responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures, and site safety.

5.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 7 3.4 Phased Work Authorization
The Parties acknowledge that the Project is intended to proceed in phases due to emergency conditions, evolving site information, regulatory requirements, funding considerations, and the need to prioritize protection of critical infrastructure.

The anticipated phases include the following:

Phase 2 – Pacifica Pier Investigation and Stabilization. Phase 2 may include investigation, engineering, stabilization, temporary support systems, and related activities associated with the landside portion of the Pacifica Pier.

Phase 1 – Beach Boulevard and Utility Investigation and Stabilization. Phase 1 may include investigation, engineering, emergency stabilization, shoreline protection, utility protection, access improvements, temporary support measures, and related activities necessary to protect Beach Boulevard, utilities, and adjacent public infrastructure.

Phase 1A – Interim Beach Boulevard and Utility Protective Measures. Phase 1A means a reduced or interim subset of the Phase 1 work, consisting of those emergency protective and temporary stabilization measures reasonably capable of completion before the onset of winter storm conditions, as determined by the City.

Phase 3 – Abutment Removal. Phase 3 may include removal of the deteriorated pier abutment and associated sheet pile wall, together with related drainage improvements, once the abutment is no longer required for structural support. Phase 3 removal shall not be performed until it is reasonably clear, based on engineering findings, that demolition of the abutment will not destabilize the Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, adjacent utilities, or the shoreline protection system.

Phase 4 – Shoreline Protection. Phase 4 may include placement of supplemental shoreline protection (riprap) as necessary, following removal of the deteriorated abutment under Phase 3, to protect the new and stabilized shoreline infrastructure, reduce future scour and erosion, and maintain continuity with adjacent sections of shoreline and seawall.

Preconstruction activities under any phase may include site investigations, utility investigations and potholing, geotechnical investigations, survey control, baseline condition documentation, detailed structural evaluation of the existing abutment and pier approach, inspection and supplementation or repositioning of existing temporary riprap to reduce continued erosion, scour, or loss of support at the abutment, and establishment of a preconstruction monitoring program (including vibration, crack, survey, and abutment-movement monitoring, and monitoring of nearby utilities, pavement, MSE seawall elements along Beach Boulevard, and pier components in the vicinity of construction). To allow the City to evaluate the combined stabilization system, construction interfaces, vibration and utility risks, and the final stabilized condition, the City may direct that the design for Phase 1A, Phase 2, and Phase 3 be advanced concurrently.

Notwithstanding the numbering of the phases, the Parties acknowledge and agree that the City intends to authorize the Work in the following general sequence: first, Phase 2 (Pacifica Pier investigation and stabilization), in order to establish an independent load path for the first span of the Pier and to shore and protect the Pier before pile-driving and other ground-disturbing activity

5.b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 8 adjacent to it; thereafter, either Phase 1A or Phase 1 (Beach Boulevard and utility stabilization), as the City determines in its sole discretion based upon what can reasonably be accomplished before the onset of winter storm conditions; thereafter, Phase 3 (removal of the deteriorated abutment), only once it is reasonably clear that removal will not destabilize the Pier, Beach Boulevard, utilities, or the shoreline protection system; and thereafter, Phase 4 (shoreline protection), following removal of the deteriorated abutment under Phase 3.

Nothing in this Section obligates the City to authorize Phase 1, Phase 1A, Phase 3, Phase 4, or the remainder of any phase, or to authorize the phases in any particular sequence. The City may modify, combine, divide, expand, reduce, delay, resequence, or discontinue any phase based upon engineering findings, emergency conditions, regulatory requirements, available funding, public safety considerations, seasonal or weather conditions, or other circumstances determined by the City. Once emergency stabilization construction is complete, the City may separately develop and authorize a long-term plan for the Pier and former abutment area, including rehabilitation, replacement, or removal, which is not within the scope of the phases authorized under this Agreement unless expressly added by written Phase Authorization or amendment.

3.5 Phase Authorizations and Task Orders
Contractor shall not commence Work unless authorized by a written Phase Authorization or Task Order issued by the City. Each Phase Authorization or Task Order shall identify, as applicable, the authorized scope of Work, deliverables, schedule, compensation method, not-to-exceed amount or other pricing basis, responsible City representative, required documentation, applicable funding requirements, and other terms necessary for completion of the authorized Work. Only Work authorized in writing by the City shall be eligible for payment.

3.6 Emergency Direction and Immediate Protective Measures The Parties acknowledge that emergency conditions may require immediate action before a formal Phase Authorization or Task Order can be prepared. If Contractor identifies a condition requiring immediate action to protect life, public safety, or prevent substantial damage to public infrastructure, Contractor shall immediately notify the City. The City may issue written direction authorizing emergency protective measures. Contractor shall document the condition requiring immediate action, the work performed, labor and equipment utilized, materials incorporated, duration of response, and costs incurred. Emergency action taken without prior written authorization shall not be compensable unless subsequently approved in writing by the City.

3.7 Standard of Performance
Contractor shall perform the Work in a professional and workmanlike manner, consistent with applicable industry standards, applicable to the current emergency condition of the pier and adjacent public infrastructure in compliance with applicable laws, permits, and regulations, in accordance with the Contract Documents, and in a manner that protects public health, safety, and existing infrastructure.

5.b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 9 3.8 Defective Work; Warranties
Contractor warrants that all construction services shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional standards of good and sound construction practices, all Contract Documents requirements, and all laws, codes, standards, licenses, and permits. Contractor warrants that all materials and equipment shall be new, of suitable grade of their respective kinds for their intended uses, and free from defects. Contractor hereby grants to City for a period of one year following the date of completion its unconditional warranty of the quality and adequacy of all of the Work including, without limitation, all labor, materials and equipment provided by Contractor and its Subcontractors of all tiers. If either prior to completion of the Work, or within one year after completion, any Work (completed or incomplete) is found to violate any of the foregoing warranties (Defective Work), Contractor shall promptly, without cost to the City and in accordance with City’s written instructions, correct, remove and replace the Defective Work with conforming Work, and correct, remove and replace any damage to other Work or other property resulting therefrom. If Contractor fails to do so, Contractor shall pay all of the City’s resulting claims, costs, losses and damages. Where Contractor fails to correct Defective Work, or defects are discovered outside the correction period, the City shall have all rights and remedies granted by law. The one-year warranty period for each authorized item of Work shall commence upon Final Completion and acceptance of that Work by the City. The warranties in this Section are not waived, reduced, or excused by reason of storm, weather, wave, tide, or other coastal events; the allocation of risk for loss of or damage to the Work arising from such events is governed by Section 9.10 (Risk of Loss; Storm Damage to Work) and by the All-Risk Course of Construction insurance required under Exhibit D. Contractor's warranty obligations extend to the quality and adequacy of Contractor's own Work and materials and do not constitute a warranty of the pre-existing condition of the Pacifica Pier, abutment, or other existing infrastructure not constructed by Contractor.

3.9 Matters Outside Current Scope; Damaged Abutment, Café Structure, and State Lands Obligations
The Parties acknowledge that the currently authorized Work does not include long-term stabilization, repair, or removal of the damaged Pier abutment, demolition of the former Chit Chat Café structure, or performance of the City's repair-or-remove obligations under its State Lands Commission lease, unless and to the extent such work is expressly added by a written Phase Authorization, Task Order, or Change Order. The Parties further acknowledge that the abutment is expected to continue to move or fail seaward. Contractor shall design, sequence, and install its shoring and stabilization measures so as to account for reasonably anticipated movement or failure of the abutment during the performance of the Work, and shall promptly notify the City if observed abutment or adjacent-structure conditions threaten the safety, integrity, or schedule of the Work. Responsibility for the abutment, the Café structure, and the City's State Lands lease obligations is reserved to the City, and nothing in this Agreement transfers those matters to Contractor absent express written authorization.

Contractor shall conduct its operations so as to prevent construction and demolition debris generated by the Work from entering coastal waters. If debris generated by the Work, or debris resulting from movement or failure of the abutment or other existing structures, enters or is at imminent risk of entering coastal waters, Contractor shall immediately notify the City so that the

5.b
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 10 City may provide any notification required to the California State Lands Commission, the California Coastal Commission, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. Contractor shall be responsible, at its sole cost, for the containment, recovery, and lawful disposal of debris resulting from Contractor's own operations, and shall cooperate with the City and applicable agencies regarding debris not caused by Contractor's operations.

SECTION 4

TERM AND COMMENCEMENT OF WORK

4.1 Effective Date and Term
This Agreement shall become effective on the Effective Date stated in the Agreement and shall remain in effect until completion of all authorized Work, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The City shall have no obligation to authorize any specific phase of the Project, and Contractor shall have no right to commence any phase of the Work unless authorized in accordance with this Agreement.

4.2 Notice to Proceed
Following execution of this Agreement, the City may issue a written Notice to Proceed (“NTP”) or Phase Authorization authorizing Contractor to commence specific Work. The NTP or Phase Authorization shall identify, as applicable, the authorized scope of Work, commencement date, required completion date, applicable compensation terms, reporting requirements, applicable funding requirements, and other conditions applicable to the authorized Work. Contractor shall not commence Work prior to the authorized commencement date unless directed in writing by the City.

4.3 Phase Commencement
The Parties acknowledge that the Project will proceed through separate phases and that each phase may require additional investigation, engineering evaluation, regulatory coordination, funding review, and scope refinement. The City may issue Phase Authorizations in any sequence and may authorize only portions of a contemplated phase. Commencement of one phase shall not obligate the City to authorize any subsequent phase, establish any right to additional Work, establish any minimum compensation obligation, or limit the City’s ability to modify the Project.

4.4 Time of Performance
Contractor shall diligently prosecute the authorized Work in accordance with the schedule established in the applicable Phase Authorization, Task Order, or NTP. Contractor shall provide timely notice to the City of any condition that may affect commencement, progress, completion, cost, regulatory compliance, or public safety. Contractor shall promptly submit recommendations for addressing any anticipated delay or impact.

5.b
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 11 4.5 Emergency Conditions and Schedule Adjustments
The Parties acknowledge that the Project involves emergency conditions and work in a dynamic coastal environment. The City may direct changes to sequencing, priorities, access requirements, or temporary measures when necessary to protect public health and safety, prevent additional damage, respond to changed site conditions, comply with regulatory requirements, or coordinate with funding agencies. Contractor shall cooperate with such adjustments and shall provide updated schedules and cost impacts when requested by the City.

4.6 Completion and Closeout
Contractor shall complete each authorized phase of Work in accordance with the applicable Phase Authorization and Contract Documents. Upon completion of authorized Work, Contractor shall provide all required closeout documentation, including, as applicable, final reports, record drawings, inspection documentation, warranties, releases, cost documentation, photographs, outstanding issue logs, and other documentation required by the Agreement. The City shall review the completed Work and determine whether the authorized Work has been satisfactorily completed.

SECTION 5

CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES

5.1 General Contractor Obligations
Contractor shall perform all authorized Work in accordance with this Agreement, the Contract Documents, applicable laws, permits, and accepted professional and construction practices.

Contractor shall furnish all labor, supervision, professional services, materials, equipment, tools, temporary facilities, temporary works, transportation, utilities required for Contractor’s operations, and incidentals necessary to complete the authorized Work, unless expressly identified as the responsibility of the City. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the performance, coordination, and completion of the Work assigned to Contractor.

5.2 Means, Methods, and Construction Responsibility
Contractor shall be solely responsible for construction means and methods, construction techniques, sequencing of operations, temporary works, temporary support systems, construction equipment, workforce supervision, coordination of subcontractors, and protection of the Work during performance. The City, Owner’s Representative, and their consultants may review, comment on, or observe Contractor’s Work; however, such review, comment, approval, or observation shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for the Work.

5.3 Professional Engineering Responsibility
Where Contractor provides engineering services, Contractor shall ensure that such services are performed under the responsible charge of a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of California. Contractor shall be responsible for the accuracy of engineering calculations, adequacy of engineering recommendations, completeness of technical documents, coordination between engineering and construction activities, and compliance with applicable professional

5.b
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 12 standards. Review or acceptance by the City does not relieve Contractor of its professional obligations.

5.4 Site Investigation and Existing Conditions
Contractor acknowledges that the Project involves emergency conditions and a complex coastal environment. Contractor shall evaluate available project information, verify conditions affecting the Work, identify reasonably foreseeable conflicts, coordinate additional investigations necessary to perform the authorized Work, and promptly notify the City of materially different conditions that may affect cost, schedule, safety, or scope. Contractor shall not rely solely upon reference documents provided by the City and shall perform its own evaluation of conditions affecting the Work.

5.5 Public Safety and Protection of Existing Facilities Contractor shall maintain appropriate measures to protect the public, City employees, adjacent property, pedestrians, vehicles, utilities, existing structures, environmental resources, and completed Work. Contractor shall install and maintain public protection measures before commencing construction activities that create a safety risk. Contractor shall maintain safe access and emergency access routes as required by the City.

5.6 Permits and Regulatory Compliance
Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, permits, and agency requirements. Unless otherwise assigned to the Contractor in the Contract Documents, City shall obtain and maintain permits and approvals necessary for Contractor’s operations. Contractor shall provide reasonable assistance to the City in obtaining permits, environmental approvals, and regulatory clearances required for the Project. Contractor shall promptly notify the City of any regulatory condition, permit requirement, or agency directive that may affect the Work.

5.7 Utilities and Coordination
Contractor shall coordinate with utility owners, protect existing utilities, perform utility investigations as necessary, promptly report utility conflicts, coordinate utility relocation or protection measures when authorized, and maintain utility service to the extent required by the City. Contractor shall not interrupt public utilities without prior coordination and authorization from the City and applicable utility owner.

5.8 Subcontractors and Suppliers
Contractor shall be responsible for all subcontractors, consultants, suppliers, and vendors performing Work under this Agreement. Contractor shall verify subcontractor qualifications, ensure subcontractors comply with applicable contract requirements, coordinate subcontractor activities, remain responsible for subcontractor performance, and maintain records identifying subcontractors and suppliers. No subcontracting shall relieve Contractor of any obligation under this Agreement.

5.b
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 13 5.9 Quality Control and Inspection
Contractor shall implement appropriate quality control procedures to ensure the Work complies with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall perform required testing, coordinate inspections, correct defective Work, maintain quality records, and provide documentation requested by the City. The City’s inspection or acceptance of Work shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for defective or nonconforming Work.

5.10 Project Documentation and Reporting
Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate project records, including daily reports, labor classifications and hours, equipment usage records, material quantities and costs, subcontractor records, invoices, photographs, schedule updates, safety records, inspection records, and other documentation required by the City or funding agencies. Contractor shall provide regular progress reports in a format acceptable to the City.

5.11 Cal OES and FEMA Documentation Support
Because portions of the Project may be funded through emergency assistance or disaster recovery programs, Contractor shall maintain records sufficient to support reimbursement requests. Contractor shall cooperate with documentation requests from the City, Cal OES, FEMA, auditors, inspectors, funding agencies, and governmental authorities. Contractor shall provide cost documentation necessary to demonstrate eligibility of Work performed, reasonableness of costs, labor and equipment utilization, procurement of subcontracted work, and completion of authorized activities.

5.12 Environmental Protection
Contractor shall conduct the Work in a manner that minimizes impacts to coastal resources, public access, wildlife, water quality, surrounding properties, and the environment. Contractor shall comply with all environmental requirements applicable to the authorized Work.

5.13 Duty to Notify City
Contractor shall immediately notify the City of any condition that may threaten public safety, cause additional damage, delay completion, increase cost, affect regulatory compliance, affect funding eligibility, or require a change in authorized Work.

5.14 Earthwork and Underground Facilities
If the Work involves digging trenches or other excavations that extend deeper than four feet below the surface, Contractor shall notify the City in writing of any material that Contractor believes may be hazardous waste that is required to be removed in accordance law, subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids, or unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract Documents, pursuant to Section 7104 of the Public Contract Code. For any Work involving trench shoring that costs in excess of $25,000, Contractor shall submit and the City (or

5.b
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 14 a registered civil or structural engineer employed by the City) must accept, in advance of excavation, a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during the excavation of such trench or trenches, pursuant to Labor Code Section 6705. If such plan varies from the shoring system standards, the plan shall be prepared by a registered civil or structural engineer.

Consistent with Government Code Section 4215, as between the City and Contractor, the City will be responsible for the timely removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunk line utility facilities located on the Site only if such utilities are not identified in the Contract Documents or information made available for bidding.

5.15 Project Site Conditions and Maintenance
Contractor must at all times, on a 24-hour basis and at its sole cost, maintain the Project site and staging and storage areas in clean, neat, and sanitary condition and in compliance with all Laws pertaining to safety, air quality, and dust control. Adequate toilets must be provided, and properly maintained and serviced for all workers on the Project site, located in a suitably secluded area, subject to City’s prior approval. Contractor must also, on a daily basis and at its sole cost, remove and properly dispose of the debris and waste materials from the Project site. (A) Air Emissions Control. Contractor must not discharge smoke or other air contaminants into the atmosphere in violation of any Laws.
(B) Dust and Debris. Contractor must minimize and confine dust and debris resulting from the Work. Contractor must abate dust nuisance by cleaning, sweeping, and immediately sprinkling with water excavated areas of dirt or other materials prone to cause dust, and within one hour after the Owner’s Representative notifies Contractor that an airborne nuisance exists.

The Owner’s Representative may direct that Contractor provide an approved water-spraying truck for this purpose. If water is used for dust control, Contractor will only use the minimum necessary. Contractor must take all necessary steps to keep waste water out of streets, gutters, or storm drains. If City determines that the dust control is not adequate, City may have the work done by others and deduct the cost from the Contract Price. Contractor will immediately remove any excess excavated material from the Project site and any dirt deposited on public streets. (C) Clean up. Before discontinuing Work in an area, Contractor must clean the area and remove all debris and waste along with the construction equipment, tools, machinery, and surplus materials.
(1) Except as otherwise specified, all excess Project materials, and the materials removed from existing improvements on the Project site with no salvage value or intended reuse by City, will be Contractor’s property.
(2) Hauling trucks and other vehicles leaving the Project site must be cleaned of exterior mud or dirt before traveling on City streets. Materials and loose debris must be delivered and loaded to prevent dropping materials or debris. Contractor must immediately remove spillage from hauling on any publicly traveled way. Streets affected by Work on the Project must be kept clean by street sweeping.
(D) Disposal. Contractor must dispose of all Project debris and waste materials in a safe and legal manner. Contractor will not allow any dirt, refuse, excavated material, surplus concrete or

5.b
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 15 mortar, or any associated washings, to be disposed of onto streets, into manholes, into the storm drain system, or into the ocean.
(E) Completion. At the completion of the Work, Contractor must remove from the Project site all of its equipment, tools, surplus materials, waste materials and debris, presenting a clean and neat appearance. Before demobilizing from the Project site, Contractor must ensure that all surfaces are cleaned, sealed, waxed, or finished as applicable, and that all marks, stains, paint splatters, and the like have been properly removed from the completed Work and the surrounding areas. Contractor must ensure that all parts of the construction are properly joined with the previously existing and adjacent improvements and conditions. Contractor must provide all cutting, fitting and patching needed to accomplish that requirement. Contractor must also repair or replace all existing improvements that are damaged or removed during the Work, both on and off the Project site, including curbs, sidewalks, driveways, fences, signs, utilities, street surfaces and structures.
(F) Non-Compliance. If Contractor fails to comply with its maintenance and cleanup obligations or any City clean up order, City may, acting in its sole discretion, elect to suspend the Work until the condition(s) is corrected with no increase in the Contract Time or Contract Price, or undertake appropriate cleanup measures without further notice and deduct the cost from any amounts due or to become due to Contractor.

5.16 Vibration Monitoring and Protection of Third-Party Property The Parties acknowledge that pile-driving and other ground-disturbing Work may induce ground movement and could cause deformation or damage to the mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall, the Bent A support and Span 1, adjacent residences, and other nearby public and private property. Before commencing any pile-driving or other vibration-generating Work, Contractor shall, as conditions of proceeding: (a) conduct and document a pre-construction condition survey of the MSE wall, adjacent structures, utilities, and reasonably accessible neighboring properties potentially affected by the Work; (b) submit for the City's acceptance a vibration monitoring plan establishing monitoring locations and peak-particle-velocity or equivalent thresholds, together with the responsive actions Contractor will take if a threshold is approached or exceeded; and (c) perform continuous or periodic vibration monitoring during such Work as specified in the accepted plan. Responsibility for damage to third-party or City property caused by Contractor's operations is allocated as provided in Section 12 and Exhibit D. Contractor shall not defer the matters required by this Section to a post-award scoping document, and vibration- or groundmovement-related damage shall not be treated as an excluded cost or an allowance absent the City's prior written agreement.

5.17 Confirmation of Condition Assumptions
Contractor acknowledges that its proposed scope, means and methods, schedule, and pricing rest on preliminary and, in part, unverified assumptions regarding existing conditions, including assumptions concerning the span-to-cap connection and the adequacy and repairability of the existing pile bents. Contractor shall confirm these assumptions through its own Phase 2 and, as applicable, Phase 1 investigation before the corresponding scope and price are finalized in a Phase Authorization. Contractor shall not rely upon any draft engineering report that, by its terms, is not to be relied upon, as the basis for a fixed scope, a fixed price, or any representation

5.b
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 16 to the City, Cal OES, or the City's insurer. If investigation discloses conditions materially worse than assumed, the matter shall be addressed under Section 8 (Changes and Additional Work).

5.18 Coordination of Public and Agency Communications; Consistency of Records Contractor shall route its reports, drawings, assessments, and other Project deliverables to the City and shall not transmit them, or make statements characterizing the cause, origin, or history of the damage to the Pacifica Pier and adjacent infrastructure, to Cal OES, FEMA, the City's insurer or its adjuster, the media, or the public, except through or as directed by the City.

Contractor shall cooperate with the City so that the descriptions of scope, cause, condition, and cost in Contractor's deliverables are accurate and consistent with the record the City submits to its funding agencies and insurer. This Section does not limit Contractor's obligations to respond truthfully to a lawful audit, subpoena, or regulatory inquiry, or to make any report required by law or permit; Contractor shall promptly notify the City of any such required communication.

5.19 Proposal Exclusions and Assumptions Not Operative
Notwithstanding any exclusion, exception, or assumption in the Contractor’s Proposal, Contractor shall provide All-Risk Course of Construction insurance as required by Exhibit D, shall perform the pre-construction condition survey and vibration monitoring required by Section

5.16, and shall perform all obligations of this Agreement and each Exhibit without regard to any exclusion, exception, assumption, or reservation stated in the Proposal. No such Proposal exclusion, exception, assumption, or reservation shall reduce, limit, or excuse any obligation of the Contractor under this Agreement.

5.20 City-Furnished Information and Preliminary GHD Deliverables; No Warranty; Contractor Responsible for Investigation and Design
Contractor acknowledges that the drawings, reports, assessments, and other information prepared by the City's engineer, GHD, including the June 2026 abutment condition assessment and any related concept or design drawings, are preliminary and, in whole or in part, marked or otherwise identified as draft and not final. Such materials, together with all other existing information, assessments, drawings, reports, and photographs furnished by or on behalf of the City, are provided for informational purposes only. The City does not warrant, and shall not be deemed to have warranted, the accuracy, completeness, or sufficiency of such materials, and Contractor shall not rely upon them as a representation of existing conditions or as the basis for a fixed scope, a fixed price, or any representation to the City, Cal OES, or the City's insurer. Contractor is solely responsible for conducting its own investigation, for verifying existing conditions affecting the Work, and for performing the engineering effort necessary to finalize its recommended design. This Section supplements, and does not limit, Sections 2.2, 5.4, and 5.17.

5.b
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 17 SECTION 6

CITY RESPONSIBILITIES

6.1 General City Responsibilities
The City shall administer the Agreement and provide reasonable cooperation necessary for Contractor to perform the authorized Work. The City’s responsibilities shall be limited to those expressly identified in the Contract Documents.

6.2 Designated City Representative
The City shall designate a representative authorized to administer the Agreement and coordinate with Contractor regarding Phase Authorizations, Task Orders, schedules, submittals, payment requests, project coordination, contract administration, and other matters identified by the City.

The City’s designated representative may coordinate with the Owner’s Representative and other City consultants in carrying out these responsibilities.

6.3 Existing Information and Documents
The City shall provide Contractor with available project information in the City’s possession, including, as applicable, existing drawings, prior inspection reports, assessment reports, photographs, available studies, known utility information, and other reference materials.

Contractor acknowledges that such information is provided for convenience and informational purposes only and that Contractor remains responsible for independently evaluating conditions affecting the Work.

6.4 Access to Project Site
Subject to applicable requirements and safety considerations, the City shall provide Contractor reasonable access to City-controlled portions of the Project site necessary to perform authorized Work. The City does not guarantee unrestricted access where access is affected by public safety concerns, regulatory requirements, weather, coastal conditions, third-party rights, utilities, or other circumstances beyond the City’s control.

6.5 Coordination and Agency Communication
The City shall coordinate, as appropriate, with regulatory agencies, utilities, public stakeholders, funding agencies, adjacent property owners, and other governmental entities. Contractor shall provide technical information and support reasonably necessary for such coordination. Unless expressly assigned to Contractor, the City shall retain responsibility for agency policy decisions, funding decisions, and owner approvals.

6.6 Review of Contractor Submittals
The City may review Contractor submittals, including schedules, cost proposals, engineering documents, work plans, reports, payment applications, and other Contract Documents. City review, comment, approval, or acceptance shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for

5.b
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 18 accuracy, completeness, compliance with applicable requirements, construction means and methods, or performance of the Work.

6.7 Payments
The City shall review and process properly submitted payment requests in accordance with this Agreement. The City’s payment obligations shall be limited to Work authorized by the City, performed in accordance with the Agreement, and supported by required documentation. The City shall have no obligation to pay for unauthorized Work unless subsequently approved in writing by the City.

6.8 Regulatory and Funding Decisions
The City shall retain responsibility for decisions regarding project funding strategy, acceptance of reimbursement requirements, selection among alternative project approaches, final owner decisions, authorization of additional phases, and approval of changes affecting City obligations.

Contractor acknowledges that approval, eligibility, or reimbursement decisions by Cal OES, FEMA, or other agencies are outside the City’s control.

6.9 No Assumption of Contractor Responsibility
Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as requiring the City to direct Contractor’s construction means and methods, supervise Contractor’s employees, control Contractor’s safety program, guarantee site conditions, warrant the completeness of reference documents, or assume responsibility for Contractor’s performance.

SECTION 7

COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT

7.1 General Compensation Requirements
The City shall compensate Contractor only for authorized Work performed in accordance with this Agreement, applicable Phase Authorizations, Task Orders, and Contract Documents.

Contractor shall not be entitled to compensation for unauthorized Work, Work outside the approved scope, costs not supported by required documentation, or costs incurred contrary to the terms of this Agreement.

7.2 Phase-Based Compensation
Because the Project involves emergency conditions and evolving site information, compensation may be established separately for each Phase Authorization or Task Order. Each Phase Authorization or Task Order shall identify the applicable compensation method, which may include lump sum pricing, unit pricing, time and materials, cost reimbursement with agreed markups, negotiated not-to-exceed amounts, or other pricing methods approved in writing by the

5.b
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 19 City. The City shall have no obligation to authorize additional phases or additional compensation unless approved in writing by an authorized City representative.

7.3 Cost Reasonableness
Contractor acknowledges that the City is responsible for ensuring that costs associated with the Project are reasonable and adequately documented. Contractor shall provide sufficient cost information to allow the City to evaluate proposed pricing, including labor classifications and rates, equipment rates, material costs, subcontractor costs, supplier quotations, overhead, profit, assumptions, exclusions, and other cost information reasonably requested by the City. The City may request additional documentation or justification regarding proposed costs before approving payment or additional Work.

7.4 Time and Materials Work
Where Work is authorized on a time and materials basis, Contractor shall maintain daily records identifying employee names or classifications, hours worked, equipment used, equipment hours, materials incorporated, subcontractor activities, location of work performed, description of activities, and supporting documentation. Contractor shall submit time and materials records in a format acceptable to the City. Failure to maintain adequate records may result in rejection or adjustment of payment requests.

7.5 Not-to-Exceed Amounts
The City may establish a not-to-exceed amount for any Phase Authorization, Task Order, or category of Work. Contractor shall not exceed an approved not-to-exceed amount without prior written authorization from the City. Contractor shall provide timely notice when it anticipates that authorized costs may exceed approved amounts.

7.6 Payment Requests
Contractor shall submit payment requests in accordance with the schedule and procedures established by the City. Each payment request shall include, as applicable, a description of Work completed, percentage of completion, labor records, equipment records, material invoices, subcontractor invoices, photographs, schedule updates, cost summaries, and other supporting documentation required by the City. The City may withhold payment for disputed amounts, incomplete documentation, defective Work, or unauthorized costs.

7.7 Retention
The City may withhold retention from progress payments in accordance with applicable law and the terms of this Agreement. Retention shall not be released until completion of the applicable authorized Work and satisfaction of closeout requirements. Contractor may elect to substitute securities or direct payment to an escrow account, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300 (incorporated herein by this reference).

5.b
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 20 7.8 Changes in Scope and Additional Compensation
Contractor shall not perform additional Work, changes in scope, or modifications to authorized Work without written authorization from the City. Requests for additional compensation shall include a description of changed conditions or additional Work, the reason the Work was necessary, proposed cost, schedule impact, supporting documentation, and any other information requested by the City. The City may approve, reject, or negotiate requests for additional compensation.

7.9 Funding and Reimbursement Requirements
Contractor acknowledges that portions of the Project may be submitted for reimbursement through Cal OES, FEMA, or other funding programs. Contractor shall provide documentation reasonably necessary for the City to demonstrate eligibility of costs, reasonableness of costs, procurement compliance, completion of authorized Work, and compliance with funding requirements. Contractor shall not represent to any funding agency that reimbursement is guaranteed. The City’s obligation to pay Contractor shall not depend upon receipt of reimbursement from FEMA, Cal OES, or any other funding source unless expressly stated otherwise in a written agreement.

7.10 Audit and Review of Costs
The City, Cal OES, FEMA, and other authorized governmental agencies shall have the right to review, inspect, audit, and copy records relating to compensation and costs under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain records and make them available in accordance with the Agreement and applicable law.

7.11 Estimates; Conversion to Not-to-Exceed Pricing; Overruns Contractor acknowledges that the bid items, unit costs, and totals set forth in Contractor's Proposal are preliminary estimates provided for comparison and planning purposes and do not constitute a fixed or guaranteed price. Before Work under any phase proceeds, the applicable pricing shall be established in the corresponding Phase Authorization as a lump sum, unit price, or a negotiated not-to-exceed amount, developed on an open-book basis and supported by the cost documentation required under Exhibit C. Except to the extent the City approves an increase in writing, costs exceeding an approved lump sum or not-to-exceed amount are the responsibility of Contractor and shall not be reimbursed. Contractor shall promptly reconcile and correct any acknowledged errors in its bid items (including the unit-cost error identified by Contractor) before those items are incorporated into a Phase Authorization. Allowances, contingencies, and estimated quantities shall be reconciled to actual, documented cost, and no allowance shall be paid except to the extent of Work actually performed and documented.

7.12 Segregation of Emergency and Permanent (Betterment) Costs In each cost proposal, guaranteed maximum price or not-to-exceed submission, and payment request, Contractor shall separately identify and segregate (a) costs attributable to emergency

5.b
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 21 protective measures and temporary stabilization from (b) costs attributable to permanent, intermediate, or upgraded construction, including any corrosion allowance, thicker or reinforced sections, protective coatings, encasement, or other elements that extend beyond restoring the affected facility to its pre-event kind, quality, and function. This segregation shall be maintained from the outset so that reimbursable emergency work and non-reimbursable permanent or betterment work can be tracked separately for purposes of the City's Cal OES/CDAA and insurance positions. Costs that are not so segregated may be withheld until the segregation is provided.

SECTION 8

CHANGES AND ADDITIONAL WORK

8.1 General Change Authority
The City may modify the authorized Work, including scope, sequencing, schedule, quantities, methods of delivery, or other requirements, through written authorization in accordance with this Agreement. Changes may be required due to emergency conditions, unforeseen site conditions, investigation findings, structural conditions, utility conflicts, environmental or regulatory requirements, public safety considerations, funding requirements, or other circumstances affecting the Project. Contractor shall promptly comply with authorized changes.

8.2 Written Change Authorization Required
Contractor shall not perform additional Work, changed Work, or Work outside an authorized Phase Authorization or Task Order without prior written authorization from the City, except as expressly permitted for emergency protective measures under this Agreement. A verbal direction, discussion, recommendation, or observation by City personnel shall not constitute authorization for additional compensation unless confirmed in writing by an authorized City representative.

8.3 Change Requests by Contractor
If Contractor believes that a condition requires a change to the authorized Work, Contractor shall promptly submit a written request to the City. The request shall include, as applicable, a description of the proposed change, the reason for the change, supporting technical information, drawings or calculations, proposed cost impact, proposed schedule impact, impacts to permits or regulatory approvals, and other information requested by the City. Contractor shall continue performance of unaffected Work unless otherwise directed by the City.

8.4 Change Order Process
Changes affecting compensation, schedule, or scope shall be documented through a written Change Order, revised Phase Authorization, Task Order amendment, or other written authorization acceptable to the City. Each approved change shall identify, as applicable, revised scope, additional or reduced compensation, revised schedule, funding source if applicable, required documentation, special conditions, and approval authority.

5.b
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 22 8.5 Differing Site Conditions
Contractor acknowledges that the Project involves an existing coastal facility and emergency conditions that may include unknown or concealed conditions. If Contractor encounters conditions materially different from those reasonably anticipated based upon the Contract Documents, Contractor shall immediately notify the City, protect the site and public safety, document the condition, avoid unnecessary disruption of Work, and provide recommendations for addressing the condition. The City shall determine whether the condition requires a change in scope, additional investigation, modified construction methods, or other action.

8.6 Emergency Protective Measures
If immediate action is required to protect life, public safety, or prevent substantial damage to public infrastructure, Contractor may take reasonable emergency protective measures after notifying the City as soon as practicable. Contractor shall document the emergency condition, actions taken, personnel and equipment utilized, materials used, duration of activities, and associated costs. Payment for emergency protective measures shall be subject to City review and written approval.

8.7 Regulatory and Agency-Required Changes
The City may direct changes required by permitting agencies, environmental agencies, utility owners, Cal OES, FEMA, other governmental authorities, or changes in applicable law.

Contractor shall provide timely information regarding cost, schedule, and technical impacts associated with such changes.

8.8 No Constructive Changes
Contractor shall not be entitled to additional compensation based solely upon City review comments, requests for clarification, inspections, coordination meetings, review of submittals, or ordinary administration of the Agreement. Contractor shall provide written notice of any claim that a City action constitutes a change to the Work.

8.9 Documentation of Changes
Contractor shall maintain complete records relating to all approved changes, including authorizations, cost records, schedule impacts, labor and equipment records, materials documentation, photographs, correspondence, and other supporting information.

8.10 Adjustments to Contract Prices for Changes
The amount of any increase or decrease in the Contract Price will be determined based on one of the following methods listed below. Markup applies only to City-authorized time and material Work, and does not apply to any other payments to Contractor. For Work items or components

5.b
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 23 that are deleted in their entirety, Contractor will only be entitled to compensation for those direct, actual, and documented costs (including restocking fees), reasonably incurred before Contractor was notified of the City’s intent to delete the Work, with no markup for overhead, profit, or other indirect costs.
(A) Unit Pricing. Amounts previously provided by Contractor in the form of unit prices will apply to determine the price for the affected Work, to the extent applicable unit prices have been provided for that type of Work. No additional markup for overhead, profit, or other indirect costs will be added to the calculation.
(B) Lump Sum. A mutually agreed upon, all-inclusive lump sum price for the affected Work with no additional markup for overhead, profit, or other indirect costs. (C) Time and Materials. On a time and materials basis, if and only to the extent compensation on a time and materials basis is expressly authorized by City in advance of Contractor’s performance of the Work and subject to any not-to-exceed limit. Time and materials compensation for increased costs or Extra Work (but not decreased costs or deleted Work), will include allowed markup for overhead, profit, and other indirect costs, calculated as the total of the following sums, the cumulative total of which may not exceed the maximum markup rate of 15%:
(1) All direct labor costs provided by the Contractor, excluding superintendence, project management, or administrative costs, plus 15% markup;
(2) All direct material costs provided by the Contractor, including sales tax, plus 15% markup;
(3) All direct plant and equipment rental costs provided by the Contractor, plus 15% markup; (4) All direct additional subcontract costs plus 5% markup for Work performed by Subcontractors; and
(5) Increased bond or insurance premium costs computed at 1.5% of total of the previous four sums.

SECTION 9

SCHEDULE, DELAYS, AND TIME EXTENSIONS

9.1 Contractor Responsibility for Schedule
Contractor shall diligently prosecute the authorized Work and shall perform the Work in accordance with the schedule established in the applicable Phase Authorization, Task Order, Notice to Proceed, or other written authorization issued by the City. Contractor shall provide sufficient personnel, equipment, supervision, and resources necessary to maintain progress and complete the authorized Work within the approved schedule.

5.b
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 24 9.2 Project Schedule Requirements
For each authorized phase of the Project, Contractor shall provide a schedule identifying, as applicable, major activities, investigation milestones, engineering milestones, permitting activities, procurement activities, mobilization, construction activities, testing and inspection, substantial completion, final completion, and required deliverables. Contractor shall update the schedule as requested by the City.

9.3 Notice of Delay
Contractor shall promptly notify the City in writing of any condition that may affect completion of the authorized Work, including delays in progress, potential schedule impacts, changed conditions, material availability issues, subcontractor impacts, regulatory issues, utility conflicts, weather impacts, or other circumstances affecting performance.

Notice shall include the cause of delay, anticipated duration, affected activities, proposed mitigation measures, and anticipated cost or schedule impacts, if any.

9.4 Mitigation of Delays
Contractor shall use commercially reasonable efforts to avoid, minimize, and mitigate delays.

Mitigation efforts may include resequencing Work, adjusting staffing, modifying construction operations, coordinating with suppliers, proposing alternative approaches, and providing recovery schedules. The City may request additional schedule recovery measures when reasonably necessary to protect public safety or project objectives.

9.5 Excusable Delays
Contractor may be entitled to a reasonable extension of time for delays caused by events beyond Contractor’s reasonable control, including acts of God, extraordinary weather events, governmental actions, regulatory delays not caused by Contractor, unforeseen site conditions, utility delays outside Contractor’s control, changes directed by the City, or other causes approved by the City. A time extension shall not be automatic and shall require written approval by the City.

9.6 Contractor-Caused Delays
Contractor shall not be entitled to a time extension or additional compensation for delays caused by Contractor’s failure to properly staff the Work, inadequate planning, failure to timely procure materials, failure to coordinate subcontractors, defective Work, failure to comply with Contract Documents, or other circumstances within Contractor’s control.

9.7 Regulatory and Funding-Related Delays
The Parties acknowledge that the Project may require coordination with regulatory agencies, funding agencies, and other governmental entities. Delays resulting from agency review,

5.b
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 25 permitting processes, funding review, or required approvals shall be addressed based on the circumstances and applicable provisions of this Agreement. Contractor shall continue to cooperate with the City and provide information necessary to facilitate agency review.

9.8 Coastal and Emergency Conditions
Contractor acknowledges that the Project site is subject to changing coastal conditions, including tides, wave action, erosion, storm events, access limitations, and other environmental conditions.

Contractor shall incorporate appropriate planning, monitoring, and contingency measures into its operations. Emergency conditions shall not relieve Contractor of its obligation to promptly notify the City and take reasonable actions to protect the public and the Work.

9.9 No Waiver of Contract Rights
The City’s review of schedules, acceptance of delayed performance, or failure to immediately exercise a contractual right shall not constitute a waiver of any provision of this Agreement.

9.10 Risk of Loss; Storm Damage to Work
The Parties acknowledge that authorized Work, including the marine and pile-driving Work, is scheduled to be performed during the winter storm season in a dynamic coastal environment.

Until Final Completion and acceptance of an authorized item of Work by the City, Contractor bears the risk of loss of, and damage to, the Work in progress, including damage caused by storm, wave, tide, wind, flooding, and other coastal events, and Contractor shall repair, restore, or replace such Work at its own cost, except to the extent the loss or damage is caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Contractor shall maintain All-Risk Course of Construction insurance meeting the requirements of Exhibit D, written to cover the perils of named windstorm and flood, in an amount not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the completed value of the Work, and shall include the cost of such coverage in its pricing.

Contractor shall sequence, protect, and secure the Work, and shall implement winter storm and stormwater protection measures, so as to minimize exposure of incomplete Work to storm damage. This Section allocates the risk of loss for storm and weather damage to the Work and is not superseded, limited, or excused by the excusable-delay provisions of Section 9.5 or the warranty provisions of Section 3.8; a time extension under Section 9.5 for a qualifying weather event does not relieve Contractor of its obligation to repair or restore storm-damaged Work.

SECTION 10

PERMITS AND REGULATORY COORDINATION

10.1 General Regulatory Compliance
Contractor shall perform the authorized Work in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, ordinances, permits, approvals, and agency requirements. Contractor shall be responsible for understanding and complying with all regulatory requirements applicable to Contractor’s operations. Contractor shall not commence ground-disturbing, in-water, overwater, pile-driving, rock-import, or similar construction activity under any phase until the City has confirmed in writing that the applicable environmental review determination under the

5.b
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 26 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the permits and environmental and historicpreservation (EHP) authorizations required for that activity are in place or that the activity is otherwise authorized to proceed. The Parties acknowledge that CEQA and EHP compliance and documentation are conditions of eligibility for Cal OES/CDAA and FEMA reimbursement, and that proceeding ahead of that documentation may jeopardize both regulatory compliance and reimbursement.

10.2 Allocation of Permit Responsibilities
The Parties acknowledge that the Project may require permits, approvals, consultations, or authorizations from various governmental agencies and regulatory entities. The City and Contractor shall cooperate in obtaining required approvals. If otherwise identified in a Phase Authorization, Task Order, or other written authorization, Contractor shall be responsible for permits and approvals directly related to Contractor’s construction operations, including, as applicable, construction-related permits, equipment operation requirements, temporary facilities, traffic control requirements, worker safety requirements, disposal requirements, and other permits customarily obtained by a contractor performing similar work. The City shall retain responsibility for owner-level decisions, project approvals, and agency coordination not expressly assigned to Contractor.

10.3 Regulatory Agency Coordination
Contractor shall provide reasonable assistance to the City in communications and coordination with regulatory agencies, including federal agencies, state agencies, regional agencies, local agencies, utility agencies, and funding agencies. Contractor shall provide technical information, drawings, calculations, schedules, environmental information, and other documentation reasonably requested by the City.

10.4 Environmental Compliance
Contractor shall perform the Work in a manner consistent with applicable environmental requirements and permit conditions. Contractor shall implement required environmental protection measures, comply with approved environmental mitigation measures, prevent unauthorized impacts to protected resources, properly manage materials and waste, immediately report environmental incidents, and cooperate with inspections and monitoring requirements.

10.5 Coastal and Marine Work Requirements
Contractor acknowledges that portions of the Project may involve coastal, shoreline, and marine conditions requiring specialized coordination and compliance. Contractor shall account for conditions including tidal fluctuations, wave action, erosion, marine access, protection of water quality, shoreline impacts, public beach access, and restrictions imposed by regulatory agencies.

Contractor shall coordinate its operations to minimize impacts to the public and coastal resources.

10.6 Permit Delays and Agency Decisions
Contractor acknowledges that regulatory approvals are controlled by third parties and may affect the Project schedule. The City does not guarantee issuance of any permit, approval of any

5.b
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 27 proposed approach, timing of agency review, or acceptance of Contractor’s documents by any regulatory agency. Contractor shall promptly notify the City of permit issues, agency comments, or regulatory conditions that may affect cost, schedule, or scope.

10.7 Changes Required by Regulatory Agencies
If a regulatory agency requires modifications to the authorized Work, the City may direct changes in accordance with the Change Order and additional Work provisions of this Agreement.

Contractor shall provide timely information regarding technical impacts, schedule impacts, cost impacts, and alternative approaches. Contractor shall not implement significant changes resulting from agency direction without written authorization from the City, unless immediate action is required to protect public safety.

10.8 Documentation of Regulatory Compliance
Contractor shall maintain and provide documentation demonstrating compliance with applicable permits and regulatory requirements, including permits, approvals, agency correspondence, inspection records, environmental monitoring records, compliance reports, and other documentation requested by the City.

SECTION 11

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

11.1 General Insurance Requirements
Contractor shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, insurance coverage required by this Agreement as referenced in Exhibit D – Insurance and Indemnification Requirements for the duration of the Work and any additional period required by applicable coverage terms.

All insurance shall be maintained with insurance companies authorized to conduct business in the State of California and having financial strength and ratings acceptable to the City.

Contractor shall ensure that all required insurance coverage applies to the Work performed under this Agreement.

SECTION 12

INDEMNIFICATION

12.1 Contractor Indemnification Obligations
Contractor agrees to the defense and indemnification Obligations described in Exhibit D – Insurance and Indemnification Requirements.

5.b
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 28 SECTION 13

BONDS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

13.1 General Bond Requirements
Contractor shall furnish bonds and other security required by applicable law, this Agreement, and the applicable Phase Authorization or Task Order. Bond requirements may vary depending upon the scope of authorized Work, contract value, nature of the Work, funding requirements, statutory requirements, and risk associated with the authorized activities.

13.2 Performance Bond
For construction Work where required by applicable law or directed by the City, Contractor shall furnish a performance bond in an amount and form acceptable to the City. The performance bond shall guarantee faithful performance of the authorized Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. The bond shall remain in effect until completion and acceptance of the bonded Work, unless otherwise approved in writing by the City.

13.3 Payment Bond
For construction Work where required by applicable law or directed by the City, Contractor shall furnish a payment bond securing payment obligations to laborers, material suppliers, subcontractors, and other persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment for the authorized Work. The payment bond shall comply with applicable California law.

13.4 Phase-Specific Bond Requirements
The City may establish different bonding requirements for different phases of the Project. For example, investigation, assessment, and limited emergency services may be authorized without full performance and payment bonds where permitted by law and determined appropriate by the City, while substantial construction, or permanent improvements may require performance and payment bonds before commencement. Any phase-specific bond requirements shall be identified in the applicable Phase Authorization or Task Order.

13.5 Form and Surety Requirements
Bonds shall be issued by a surety authorized to conduct business in California, be in a form acceptable to the City, identify the authorized Work covered by the bond, remain effective for the required period, and include any required statutory language. The City may require evidence of surety authorization and financial capability.

13.6 Increase or Decrease in Bond Requirements
The City may require adjustment of bond amounts if the scope of Work changes, the contract amount increases, additional phases are authorized, risk conditions change, or funding agency requirements apply. Any adjustment shall be documented in writing.

5.b
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 29 13.7 Failure to Maintain Bonds
Failure by Contractor to furnish or maintain required bonds shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. The City may suspend Work, withhold payment, or exercise other remedies available under this Agreement or applicable law.

13.8 Bond Costs
Unless otherwise stated in a Phase Authorization or Task Order, costs associated with required bonds shall be included in Contractor’s compensation proposal and shall be identified separately when requested by the City.

SECTION 14

PREVAILING WAGE AND LABOR REQUIREMENTS

14.1 Compliance With Labor Laws
Contractor acknowledges that portions of the Work may constitute a public works project under California law. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local labor requirements, including prevailing wage requirements, California Labor Code requirements, California Public Contract Code requirements, Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) requirements, apprenticeship requirements, and applicable payroll reporting and labor compliance obligations.

14.2 Prevailing Wage Requirements
Contractor shall pay prevailing wages to its employees on any contract in excess of $1,000.00.

Copies of the general prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the Contract, as determined by Director of the State of California Department of Industrial Relations, are on file at the City’s Public Works Department and may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations website [http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm]. Contractor shall comply with the 8-hours per day/40 hours per week/overtime/working hours restrictions for all employees, pursuant to the California Labor Code. Contractor and all subcontractors shall keep and maintain accurate employee payroll records for Work performed under the Agreement. The payroll records shall be certified and submitted as required by law, including Labor Code Sections 1771.4 (if applicable) and 1776, including to the Labor Commissioner no less frequently than monthly. Contractor shall comply fully with Labor Code Section 1777.5 in the hiring of apprentices for work relating to the Agreement. If the Agreement exceeds $2,000 and is funded with federal funds, then Contractor shall pay federal Davis Bacon wages and comply with applicable federal requirements.

14.3 Department of Industrial Relations Registration
Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771(a), Contractor represents that it and all of its Subcontractors are currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor covenants that any additional or substitute Subcontractors will

5.b
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 30 be similarly registered and qualified Contractor shall verify subcontractor compliance with applicable registration requirements.

14.4 Certified Payroll Records
Contractor shall prepare and maintain certified payroll records as required by applicable law.

Certified payroll records shall include, as applicable, employee names, classifications, hours worked, wages paid, fringe benefits, deductions, project identification information, and other information required by law. Contractor shall provide certified payroll records to the City upon request and within required statutory timeframes.

14.5 Subcontractor Labor Compliance
Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that all subcontractors comply with applicable labor requirements. Contractor shall include appropriate labor compliance provisions in subcontract agreements, obtain required documentation, monitor subcontractor compliance, and promptly address any labor compliance issues. Failure of a subcontractor to comply shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility under this Agreement.

14.6 Apprenticeship Requirements
Contractor shall comply with applicable apprenticeship requirements, including requirements established under California law, unless an applicable exemption applies. Contractor shall maintain records demonstrating compliance when required.

14.7 Labor Compliance Cooperation
Contractor shall cooperate with any labor compliance review, audit, investigation, or inquiry conducted by the City, DIR, funding agencies, governmental authorities, or authorized representatives. Contractor shall provide requested records and documentation within the time required.

14.8 Labor Compliance and Funding Documentation
Contractor acknowledges that labor documentation may be required to support reimbursement requests submitted to Cal OES, FEMA, or other funding agencies. Contractor shall maintain records sufficient to demonstrate compliance with applicable labor requirements.

14.9 Prevailing Wage Adjustments
If applicable prevailing wage rates change during performance of authorized Work, compensation adjustments shall be addressed only as provided in the applicable Phase Authorization, Task Order, or written modification approved by the City.

14.10 Failure to Comply
Failure to comply with applicable labor requirements may constitute a material breach of this Agreement. The City may pursue any remedies available under the Agreement, applicable law, or funding requirements.

5.b
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 31 SECTION 15

SAFETY, HEALTH, AND SITE SECURITY

15.1 General Safety Responsibility
Contractor shall be solely responsible for the safety of its employees, subcontractors, suppliers, consultants, visitors under Contractor’s control, and construction operations associated with the authorized Work. Contractor shall establish, implement, and maintain a comprehensive safety program appropriate for the Work and site conditions. The City’s review, observation, inspection, or communication regarding safety matters shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for jobsite safety.

15.2 Compliance With Safety Laws and Regulations
Contractor shall comply with all applicable safety and health requirements, including California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (“Cal/OSHA”) requirements, federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) requirements, applicable construction safety regulations, environmental health and safety requirements, and permit-related safety requirements. Contractor shall maintain all required safety records and documentation.

15.3 Site Safety Plan
Prior to commencing construction activities that create a safety risk, Contractor shall prepare and submit a site safety plan acceptable to the City. The safety plan shall address, as applicable, worker safety, public protection, pedestrian access, roadway protection, beach access controls, marine operations, equipment operations, fall protection, emergency procedures, hazardous materials, communication procedures, and site security. The City’s acceptance or review of the safety plan shall not transfer responsibility for safety from Contractor to the City.

15.4 Protection of the Public
Contractor shall maintain measures necessary to protect the public from hazards associated with the Work. Such measures may include fencing, barricades, warning signage, access restrictions, traffic control, pedestrian routing, lighting, security measures, beach access controls, and monitoring of restricted areas. Contractor shall maintain public protection measures throughout the duration of the authorized Work.

15.5 Pier, Shoreline, and Marine Safety
Contractor acknowledges that the Project involves unique hazards associated with coastal conditions, waves and tides, unstable shoreline areas, marine access, elevated structures, temporary support systems, heavy equipment operations, and changing weather conditions.

Contractor shall implement appropriate safety measures and shall continuously evaluate site conditions affecting worker and public safety. Because the governing engineering assessment recommends that personnel access over the abutment and damaged Pier spans be avoided until stability and safety hazards are addressed, Contractor shall not place personnel on or over the damaged span, abutment, or shoring bent until Contractor has submitted, and the City has accepted, a written safety basis and work plan for that activity establishing the stabilization

5.b
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 32 achieved and the controls to be used. Nothing in this Section transfers responsibility for jobsite safety, means, or methods from Contractor to the City.

15.6 Emergency Response and Notification
Contractor shall immediately notify the City of any serious injury, public safety incident, environmental incident, structural movement, utility damage, property damage, significant site condition change, or event that may affect continuation of the Work. Contractor shall cooperate with emergency responders and City emergency personnel.

15.7 Site Security
Contractor shall maintain reasonable site security measures to prevent unauthorized access to areas where Work is being performed. Contractor shall secure equipment, materials, temporary structures, hazardous areas, and restricted work zones.

15.8 Safety Meetings and Coordination
Contractor shall conduct safety meetings appropriate to the Work and shall coordinate safety requirements with subcontractors, suppliers, City representatives, Owner’s Representative, and other project participants.

15.9 Stop Work for Imminent Hazards
Contractor shall have authority and responsibility to stop Work when Contractor determines that an imminent hazard exists. Contractor shall promptly notify the City of the condition and proposed corrective action. The City may direct suspension of Work when necessary to protect life safety, public safety, property, the environment, or emergency response operations.

15.10 No City Assumption of Safety Responsibility
Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as requiring the City to supervise Contractor employees, direct construction operations, control Contractor safety procedures, inspect every safety condition, or assume responsibility for Contractor’s safety program.

SECTION 16

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

16.1 General Environmental Compliance
Contractor shall perform the authorized Work in a manner that protects the environment and complies with all applicable environmental laws, regulations, permits, approvals, mitigation measures, and agency requirements. Contractor shall be responsible for environmental compliance associated with Contractor’s operations, means and methods, employees, subcontractors, equipment, materials, and disposal activities.

16.2 Environmental Coordination
The Parties acknowledge that the Project may require coordination with environmental and regulatory agencies, including federal, state, regional, and local agencies. Contractor shall

5.b
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 33 provide reasonable assistance to the City in obtaining, maintaining, and documenting required environmental approvals. Contractor shall provide technical information, construction methods, schedules, monitoring information, and other documentation reasonably requested by the City.

16.3 Protection of Coastal and Marine Resources
Contractor shall conduct the Work in a manner that minimizes impacts to coastal resources, marine habitat, water quality, public beach areas, wildlife, vegetation, fisheries resources, and surrounding properties. Contractor shall implement all required environmental protection measures identified in applicable permits, agency approvals, environmental documents, construction plans, or written direction from the City.

16.4 Stormwater and Water Quality Protection
Contractor shall implement appropriate measures to prevent the discharge of pollutants, sediment, debris, fuels, oils, concrete materials, or other substances into storm drains, waterways, coastal waters, public areas, or adjacent properties. Contractor shall comply with applicable stormwater requirements and maintain required controls throughout the performance of the Work.

16.5 Hazardous Materials
Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations governing the handling, storage, transportation, and disposal of hazardous materials. Contractor shall properly identify hazardous materials, maintain required documentation, use appropriate handling procedures, train personnel as required, prevent releases, and properly dispose of regulated materials.

16.6 Unknown or Suspected Contaminated Materials
If Contractor encounters material suspected of being contaminated, hazardous, or requiring special handling, Contractor shall stop affected Work if necessary to protect health and safety, secure the area, immediately notify the City, document the condition, avoid disturbing the material unless authorized, and cooperate with required testing and evaluation. The City shall determine the appropriate response, including whether additional investigation, removal, disposal, or other measures are required.

16.7 Spill Prevention and Response
Contractor shall maintain appropriate spill prevention and response procedures. In the event of a spill, release, or environmental incident, Contractor shall immediately take reasonable steps to contain and control the release, notify the City, notify appropriate agencies when required, document the incident, and complete required corrective actions. Contractor shall be responsible for costs arising from releases caused by Contractor’s acts or omissions.

16.8 Waste Management and Disposal
Contractor shall properly manage, transport, and dispose of construction debris, excavated materials, and other waste generated by Contractor’s operations. Contractor shall use authorized disposal facilities, maintain disposal records, provide documentation upon request, and comply with applicable disposal regulations.

5.b
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 34 16.9 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting
Where required by permits, agency approvals, or the City, Contractor shall perform environmental monitoring and reporting activities. Contractor shall maintain records including monitoring reports, inspection records, agency communications, photographs, compliance documentation, and corrective actions.

16.10 Environmental Changes and Additional Work
If environmental requirements, agency direction, or unforeseen environmental conditions require changes to the authorized Work, the Parties shall address such changes in accordance with the Change Order provisions of this Agreement. Contractor shall promptly provide information regarding technical impacts, schedule impacts, cost impacts, and alternative approaches.

16.11 Environmental Documentation for Funding Agencies
Contractor shall provide documentation reasonably requested by the City to support environmental compliance and reimbursement requirements of Cal OES, FEMA, other governmental agencies, and applicable funding programs.

16.12 Debris in Coastal Waters; Adjacent Failing Structures The Parties acknowledge that the Work will be performed adjacent to a damaged abutment and Pier structure that may continue to move or fail, and that debris entering coastal waters may implicate the jurisdiction of the California State Lands Commission, the California Coastal Commission, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Contractor shall plan and conduct its operations to prevent, capture, and promptly remove construction debris and materials from coastal waters and the beach, shall immediately notify the City of any actual or threatened release of debris into coastal waters or any observed movement or failure of the abutment or adjacent structures, and shall support the City's notifications to the foregoing agencies. Long-term stabilization or removal of the damaged abutment, and demolition or disposition of the Chit Chat Café structure, are outside the scope of the authorized Work unless and until expressly added by written Phase Authorization or Change Order; this Section does not obligate Contractor to perform that work but requires the coordination and notification described above.

SECTION 17

SUBCONTRACTORS, SUPPLIERS, AND ASSIGNMENT

17.1 Responsibility for Subcontractors and Suppliers
Contractor shall be fully responsible for the acts, omissions, errors, and performance of all subcontractors, subconsultants, suppliers, vendors, and other persons or entities performing Work under this Agreement. The use of subcontractors or suppliers shall not relieve Contractor of any obligation, duty, or responsibility under this Agreement. Contractor shall coordinate and supervise all subcontractor and supplier activities necessary to complete the authorized Work.

5.b
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 35 17.2 Qualifications of Subcontractors and Subconsultants Contractor shall use subcontractors, subconsultants, and suppliers that are properly qualified, licensed, experienced, and capable of performing the assigned Work. Contractor shall ensure that specialty firms performing portions of the Work possess appropriate experience, including marine construction, pile and foundation work, coastal stabilization, geotechnical work, engineering services, environmental services, and other specialized activities applicable to the Project.

17.3 Key Personnel and Key Subcontractors
Contractor acknowledges that the City selected Contractor based in part upon Contractor’s proposed team, qualifications, experience, and emergency response capabilities. Contractor shall not replace key personnel or key subcontractors identified in Contractor’s Proposal without prior written notice to and approval by the City. The City shall not unreasonably withhold approval of proposed substitutions; however, the City may reject proposed substitutions that do not possess qualifications substantially equivalent to those represented in Contractor’s Proposal.

17.4 Subcontractor Agreements
Contractor shall require subcontractors and subconsultants performing Work under this Agreement to comply with all applicable requirements, including insurance requirements, indemnification obligations, labor requirements, safety requirements, environmental requirements, recordkeeping requirements, audit requirements, and funding documentation requirements.

17.5 Subcontractor Payment Obligations
Contractor shall timely pay subcontractors, suppliers, and other persons providing labor, materials, equipment, or services for the Work in accordance with applicable law and contractual obligations. The City shall have no obligation to resolve payment disputes between Contractor and subcontractors.

17.6 Subcontractor Documentation
Upon request, Contractor shall provide the City with information regarding subcontractors and suppliers, including names, scope of assigned Work, qualifications, licenses, insurance information, payment status, labor compliance documentation, and other information reasonably requested by the City.

17.7 Assignment of Agreement
Contractor shall not assign, transfer, delegate, or otherwise dispose of any rights or obligations under this Agreement without prior written approval of the City. Any attempted assignment without approval shall be void. This restriction shall not prohibit Contractor from entering into ordinary-course agreements with subcontractors and suppliers necessary to perform the authorized Work, provided Contractor remains responsible for their performance.

5.b
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 36 17.8 Change in Ownership or Control
Contractor shall provide written notice to the City of any anticipated change in ownership, corporate control, or organizational structure that may affect Contractor’s ability to perform the Work. The City may evaluate whether such change affects Contractor’s qualifications or obligations under this Agreement.

17.9 No Relationship Between City and Subcontractors
Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and any subcontractor, supplier, consultant, or vendor of Contractor. Contractor shall remain the sole responsible party for payment, direction, supervision, and performance of subcontractors.

17.10 Emergency Subcontracting
The Parties acknowledge that emergency conditions may require Contractor to engage specialty subcontractors on an expedited basis. Contractor shall provide prompt notice to the City of emergency subcontractor engagements and shall ensure that all applicable Contract requirements are satisfied.

SECTION 18

RECORDS, AUDIT RIGHTS, AND PUBLIC RECORDS

18.1 Maintenance of Project Records
Contractor shall maintain complete, accurate, and organized records relating to the performance of the authorized Work. Records shall include, as applicable, contracts and subcontracts, labor records, certified payroll records, equipment records, material records, invoices, cost documentation, schedules, daily reports, inspection records, engineering documents, environmental documentation, permits and approvals, correspondence, photographs, safety records, and other documents necessary to demonstrate performance of the Work.

18.2 Record Retention
Contractor shall retain Project records for Contractor shall maintain all such documents and records prepared by or furnished to Contractor during the course of performing the Work for at least five years following completion of the Work, except that all such items pertaining to hazardous materials shall be maintained for at least thirty (30) years.

18.3 Audit and Inspection Rights
The City and its authorized representatives shall have the right to inspect, review, audit, and copy records relating to the Work and compensation under this Agreement. Such rights shall include access to records maintained by Contractor, subcontractors, subconsultants, suppliers, and other entities performing Work under this Agreement. Contractor shall provide reasonable access during normal business hours and shall cooperate with any review or audit.

5.b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 37 18.4 Funding Agency Access
Contractor acknowledges that the Project may be subject to review, audit, inspection, or documentation requirements imposed by Cal OES, FEMA, federal agencies, state agencies, auditors, inspectors, other governmental entities, or funding authorities. Contractor shall provide records and assistance reasonably requested to support such reviews.

18.5 Cost Documentation Requirements
Contractor shall maintain records sufficient to establish the nature and necessity of Work performed, labor and equipment utilized, materials incorporated, subcontractor costs, basis of compensation, reasonableness of costs, compliance with procurement requirements, and completion of authorized Work. The City may reject or withhold payment for costs that are not adequately documented.

18.6 Ownership and Use of Project Documents
Documents prepared specifically for the City as part of the authorized Work, including reports, drawings, calculations, studies, and record documentation, shall become the property of the City upon payment for the applicable Work, except for Contractor’s pre-existing intellectual property and proprietary tools. Contractor shall provide the City with copies of Project documents necessary for operation, maintenance, permitting, funding, and future improvements.

18.7 Public Records Compliance
Contractor acknowledges that the City is a public agency subject to the California Public Records Act and other applicable transparency laws. Contractor shall cooperate with the City in responding to public records requests relating to the Agreement and the Work. Nothing in this Agreement requires Contractor to disclose information protected from disclosure under applicable law.

18.8 Confidential and Proprietary Information
If Contractor provides information that Contractor believes is confidential or proprietary, Contractor shall clearly identify such information at the time of submission. The City shall determine whether disclosure is required under applicable law. Contractor acknowledges that submission of information to the City does not guarantee confidentiality.

18.9 Electronic Records
Contractor may maintain Project records electronically, provided such records are complete, accurate, accessible, reproducible, and maintained in a manner consistent with applicable requirements.

18.10 Failure to Maintain Records
Failure to maintain required records or provide requested documentation may result in withholding of payment, disallowance of unsupported costs, corrective action requirements, audit findings, or other remedies available under this Agreement or applicable law.

5.b
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 38 SECTION 19

SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION

19.1 City Right to Suspend Work
The City may suspend all or any portion of the authorized Work by written notice to Contractor when the City determines suspension is necessary or appropriate due to emergency conditions, public health or safety concerns, changing site conditions, regulatory requirements, funding considerations, protection of public infrastructure, failure to comply with Contract Documents, or other circumstances affecting the Project. Upon receipt of a suspension notice, Contractor shall immediately take reasonable steps to protect the Work, materials, equipment, and public safety.

19.2 Suspension Procedures
During a suspension period, Contractor shall secure the site, protect completed Work, maintain required safety measures, preserve project records, prevent damage or deterioration, and comply with reasonable instructions from the City. Contractor shall promptly provide information regarding the impacts of the suspension, costs incurred, schedule impacts, and recommended actions.

19.3 Termination for Convenience
The City may terminate this Agreement, any Phase Authorization, or any Task Order, in whole or in part, for convenience upon written notice to Contractor. The City may exercise this right when it determines termination is in the best interest of the City, including due to completion of emergency needs, availability of alternative funding, changed project priorities, regulatory limitations, inability to proceed with a phase, changed site conditions, or other circumstances affecting the Project.

19.4 Compensation Upon Termination for Convenience
If the City terminates Work for convenience, Contractor shall be entitled to payment for authorized Work satisfactorily performed before the effective termination date, approved costs incurred for authorized materials or commitments that cannot reasonably be canceled, and other amounts expressly approved by the City. Contractor shall not be entitled to payment for anticipated profits, unperformed Work, lost opportunity costs, consequential damages, or unauthorized commitments.

19.5 Termination for Cause
The City may terminate this Agreement or any authorized Work for cause if Contractor materially breaches this Agreement, fails to perform the Work, fails to maintain required insurance or bonds, fails to comply with applicable laws, fails to maintain required licenses or qualifications, fails to correct defective Work, abandons the Work, fails to maintain required documentation, or otherwise materially fails to perform its obligations.

5.b
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 39 19.6 Notice and Opportunity to Cure
Except where immediate action is required to protect public safety or prevent substantial damage, the City shall provide Contractor written notice of a material breach and an opportunity to cure. The notice shall identify the nature of the breach, required corrective action, and the time period for correction. Failure to timely cure may result in termination or other remedies.

19.7 Emergency Termination
The City may immediately suspend or terminate Work when necessary to address imminent threats to life safety, emergency response requirements, structural instability, environmental hazards, regulatory enforcement actions, or other urgent conditions.

19.8 Contractor Obligations Upon Termination
Upon suspension or termination, Contractor shall stop affected Work as directed, protect completed Work, remove equipment when authorized, preserve records, deliver completed documents, identify outstanding issues, and assist with transition of the Work.

19.9 City’s Right to Complete Work
If the Agreement is terminated for cause, the City may take any action permitted by law, including completing the Work itself, engaging another contractor, using available bonds or security, correcting defective Work, and recovering allowable costs.

19.10 Survival of Obligations
Termination or expiration of this Agreement shall not relieve either Party of obligations that by their nature survive termination, including indemnification obligations, record retention requirements, audit rights, confidentiality obligations, payment obligations for completed authorized Work, and dispute resolution provisions.

SECTION 20

DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND CLAIMS PROCEDURES

20.1 Good Faith Resolution
The City and Contractor shall make reasonable efforts to resolve disputes, claims, disagreements, or other matters arising from the performance of this Agreement through good faith discussions and cooperation.

The Parties acknowledge that timely resolution of issues is important due to the emergency nature of the Project and the need to protect public infrastructure.

20.2 Notice of Claim
Contractor shall provide written notice to the City of any claim, dispute, or request for additional compensation or time extension. Notice shall be provided within the time period required by applicable law, this Agreement, or the applicable Phase Authorization or Task Order. At a minimum, notice shall identify the nature of the claim, the factual basis, the date the issue arose, the Contract provisions relied upon, the anticipated cost impact, the anticipated schedule impact,

5.b
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 40 and supporting documentation available at the time of notice. Failure to provide timely notice may affect Contractor’s entitlement to additional compensation or schedule relief to the extent permitted by law.

20.3 Continuing Performance During Disputes
Unless otherwise directed by the City, Contractor shall continue performance of unaffected Work while any claim or dispute is being reviewed or resolved. Contractor shall not suspend emergency stabilization activities necessary to protect life, public safety, or infrastructure solely because of a pending dispute.

20.4 Documentation of Claims
Contractor shall maintain complete records supporting any claim, including labor records, equipment records, material costs, subcontractor costs, schedule impacts, photographs, correspondence, technical documentation, and mitigation efforts. The City may request additional information reasonably necessary to evaluate the claim.

20.5 City Review of Claims
The City shall review properly submitted claims and may request additional information, clarification, or supporting documentation. The City may approve the claim, deny the claim, negotiate resolution, authorize additional Work, issue a written determination, or pursue another resolution method permitted by law.

20.6 Disputes Regarding Contract Interpretation
If the Parties disagree regarding interpretation of the Agreement, the City’s designated representative shall make an initial written determination regarding the issue. Such determination shall not prevent Contractor from pursuing available remedies under applicable law.

20.7 Mediation and Alternative Resolution
The Parties may mutually agree to participate in mediation or another alternative dispute resolution process. Any mediation shall be conducted under procedures agreed upon by the Parties. Participation in mediation shall not waive any statutory rights or remedies.

20.8 Compliance With California Claims Requirements
Nothing in this Agreement shall waive or modify any applicable requirements of California law, including Public Contract Code Sections 9204 and 20104, et seq., relating to public contract claims, notices, administrative procedures, deadlines, or remedies. Contractor shall comply with all applicable statutory claim requirements.

20.9 No Waiver by City Actions
The City’s review, payment, inspection, discussion, or acceptance of Work shall not constitute acceptance of disputed Work, waiver of Contract requirements, approval of additional compensation, or waiver of any City rights.

5.b
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 41 20.10 Survival
The obligations and procedures contained in this Section shall survive completion, suspension, termination, or expiration of the Agreement to the extent necessary to resolve outstanding claims.

SECTION 21

GENERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS

21.1 Independent Contractor
Contractor is an independent Contractor and does not act as City’s agent in any capacity, whatsoever. Contractor is not entitled to any benefits that City provides to City employees including, without limitation, insurance, worker’s compensation benefits or payments, pension benefits, health benefits or insurance benefits. Terms within the Contract Documents regarding directives apply to and concern the result of the Contractor’s provision of Work not the means, methods, or scheduling of the Contractor’s Work. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures with respect to its provision of Work under the Contract Documents. Contractor shall pay all payroll taxes imposed by any governmental entity and will pay all other federal, state, or local taxes not specifically identified in the Contract Documents as City’s responsibility.

21.2 Compliance With Applicable Laws
Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, ordinances, orders, permits, and requirements applicable to the Work. Contractor shall obtain and maintain all licenses, certifications, and approvals required for Contractor’s performance of the authorized Work.

21.3 Governing Law
This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any legal action arising from this Agreement shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction located in San Mateo County, California unless otherwise required by law.

21.4 Notices
All notices required under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered by personal delivery, recognized overnight delivery service, certified mail, return receipt requested, or electronic transmission with confirmation of receipt where authorized. Notices shall be delivered to the representatives identified in the Agreement or otherwise designated in writing by either Party.

21.5 Entire Agreement
This Agreement, together with all incorporated exhibits, attachments, Phase Authorizations, Task Orders, and written amendments, constitutes the complete agreement between the Parties concerning the authorized Work. All prior negotiations, representations, discussions, and

5.b
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 42 understandings relating to the Work are superseded except as expressly incorporated into the Contract Documents.

21.6 Contract Documents and Order of Precedence
The Contract Documents consist of the executed Emergency Public Works Agreement, executed Phase Authorizations and Task Orders, written amendments and Change Orders, exhibits attached to the Agreement, City-issued RFP and addenda, Contractor’s Proposal, technical documents, reports, drawings, and reference documents incorporated into the Agreement, and other documents expressly incorporated by written agreement of the Parties. If a conflict exists among Contract Documents, the order of precedence listed above shall control unless otherwise stated in a written amendment or Phase Authorization.

21.7 Amendments
No modification, amendment, or change to this Agreement shall be effective unless made in writing and executed by authorized representatives of both Parties. Emergency directives affecting immediate protection of life, safety, or public infrastructure may be issued by the City’s authorized representative, with written confirmation to follow as soon as reasonably practicable.

21.8 Assignment and Binding Effect
Subject to the assignment restrictions contained in this Agreement, this Agreement shall be binding upon and benefit the Parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns.

21.9 Severability
If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. The Parties shall cooperate to replace any invalid provision with a valid provision that most closely reflects the original intent.

21.10 Non-Waiver
The failure of either Party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that provision or the right to enforce it later.

21.11 No Third-Party Beneficiaries
Except as expressly provided regarding indemnified parties, nothing in this Agreement is intended to create rights or benefits for any third party.

21.12 Conflict of Interest
Contractor represents that it has disclosed any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may affect Contractor’s ability to perform the Work. Contractor shall promptly disclose any conflicts arising during performance.

21.13 Nondiscrimination
Contractor shall comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws prohibiting discrimination in employment and contract performance.

5.b
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 43 Contractor shall not discriminate against any person based on any legally protected status.

21.14 Public Funding Requirements
Contractor acknowledges that the Project may be funded or reimbursed in whole or in part through emergency assistance, disaster recovery, or other governmental funding programs.

Contractor shall cooperate with reasonable documentation, reporting, audit, and compliance requirements imposed by funding agencies, including Cal OES and FEMA, as further set out in Exhibits E and G.

21.15 Survival of Obligations
The obligations of the Parties that by their nature extend beyond completion, payment, suspension, or termination shall survive, including indemnification obligations, insurance obligations, record retention requirements, audit rights, confidentiality obligations, dispute resolution provisions, and warranty obligations.

21.16 Execution in Counterparts and Electronic Signatures This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.

Electronic signatures and electronic copies shall be treated as originals to the extent permitted by applicable law.

CITY OF PACIFICA:

By: ______________________________
Sean Charpentier, City Manager
CONTRACTOR:

POWER ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION, CO.

Name: ______________________________
By: ______________________________
(Signature)
Its: _______________________________
Title (If Corporation: Chairman, President
or Vice President)
ATTEST:

By: ______________________________

5.b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 44 By: ______________________________
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
(Signature)
Its: _______________________________
Title (If Corporation: Chairman, President
or Vice President)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ____________________________
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
1099 INFORMATION:

Contractor Taxpayer I.D. No.:
________________

5.b
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 45 EXHIBIT A

GENERAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
Emergency Investigation and Stabilization Services. Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stabilization Project
This Exhibit summarizes general requirements applicable to the Work performed under the Emergency Public Works Agreement between the City of Pacifica (“City”) and Contractor.

The requirements below are in addition to all requirements contained in the Agreement, RFP documents, Phase Authorizations, Task Orders, permits, and applicable law.

1. Compliance With Laws and Public Works Requirements
Contractor shall perform the Work in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, permits, and agency requirements, including applicable public works, labor, safety, environmental, and funding requirements.

2. Emergency Project Delivery
The City is proceeding under emergency contracting authority due to conditions requiring immediate action to investigate, stabilize, and protect critical public infrastructure.

The City may authorize Work in phases through written Phase Authorizations or Task Orders.

3. Contractor Responsibility
Contractor shall be responsible for:
• means and methods of construction;
• sequencing and coordination of Work;
• supervision of employees and subcontractors;
• safety of Contractor operations;
• protection of the public;
• quality of Work;
• compliance with permits and regulations; and
• documentation supporting payment and reimbursement.

4. Qualifications and Key Personnel
Contractor shall perform the Work using qualified personnel and subcontractors identified in Contractor’s Proposal or approved by the City.

Replacement of key personnel or specialty subcontractors requires City approval.

5.b
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 46 5. Insurance and Indemnity
Contractor shall maintain required insurance coverage and indemnify the City as provided in the Agreement. Insurance and Indemnity requirements are detailed in Exhibit D.

6. Safety and Public Protection
Contractor shall maintain appropriate safety measures, including protection of:
• workers;
• pedestrians;
• motorists;
• beach users;
• marine users; and
• adjacent public facilities.

7. Environmental Compliance
Contractor shall comply with all applicable environmental requirements and shall protect coastal resources, water quality, and surrounding areas.

8. Documentation and Records
Contractor shall maintain complete records relating to:
• labor;
• equipment;
• materials;
• subcontractors;
• costs;
• schedules;
• permits;
• safety;
• environmental compliance; and
• completed Work.

Records shall be available for City, Cal OES, FEMA, and audit review.

9. Payment

5.b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 47 Payment shall be based on authorized Work performed in accordance with the Agreement, approved Phase Authorizations, and supporting documentation. Unsupported costs may be withheld or rejected.

10. Changes to Work
No change in scope, cost, or schedule shall be authorized without written approval from the City, except emergency directives necessary to protect life, safety, or public infrastructure.

11. Funding Compliance
Contractor shall provide documentation reasonably requested by the City to support reimbursement from:
• Cal OES;
• FEMA;
• other governmental agencies; and
• other funding sources.

12. Priority of Work
The City’s overriding priority is the protection of life and public safety. Subject to that priority, and based on current engineering direction, the City intends to authorize construction in the following sequence: first, stabilization and shoring of the Pacifica Pier (Phase 2), to protect the Pier during pile-driving and other work adjacent to it; and thereafter, stabilization of Beach Boulevard and adjacent utilities through Phase 1A or Phase 1, as the City determines based on what can be completed before the onset of winter storm conditions. The City may adjust this sequence as provided in Section 3.4 of the Agreement.

5.b
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 48 EXHIBIT B

PHASE AUTHORIZATION / TASK ORDER TEMPLATE
Emergency Investigation and Stabilization Services. Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stabilization Project
This Phase Authorization / Task Order (“Authorization”) is issued pursuant to the Emergency Public Works Agreement (“Agreement”) between the City of Pacifica (“City”) and Power Engineering Contractor, Co. (“Contractor”).

This Authorization identifies the specific Work, compensation, schedule, and requirements authorized by the City.

1. Authorization Information
Project:

Emergency Investigation, Stabilization of Pacifica Pier and Adjacent Public Infrastructure Agreement Date: _______________________
Authorization No.: _______________________
Phase / Task Order No.: _______________________
Date Issued: _______________________
Contractor: _______________________
City Project Manager: _______________________

2. Authorized Scope of Work
The City authorizes Contractor to perform the following Work:

The authorized Work includes only the scope specifically identified in this Authorization and incorporated Contract Documents.

Contractor shall not proceed with additional Work without written authorization from the City, except as provided for emergency protective measures under the Agreement.

3. Phase Identification
☐ Phase 2 – Pacifica Pier Investigation and Stabilization ☐ Phase 1A – Interim Beach Boulevard and Utility Protective Measures ☐ Phase 1 – Beach Boulevard and Utility Investigation and Stabilization ☐ Phase 3 – Abutment Removal

5.b
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 49 ☐ Phase 4 – Shoreline Protection ☐ Supplemental Emergency Work ☐ Other:

4. Description of Authorized Activities
Authorized activities may include, as applicable: ☐ Investigation and assessment ☐ Engineering services ☐ Design development ☐ Permitting assistance ☐ Emergency stabilization ☐ Temporary protective measures ☐ Construction activities ☐ Utility protection or relocation ☐ Shoreline stabilization ☐ Environmental compliance activities ☐ Other:

5. Contract Documents Incorporated
The following documents are incorporated into this Authorization: ☐ Emergency Public Works Agreement ☐ City RFP and Addenda ☐ Contractor Proposal ☐ Drawings and Technical Documents ☐ Permits and Regulatory Approvals ☐ Exhibit A – General Contract Requirements ☐ Exhibit C – Payment and Cost Documentation Requirements ☐ Other:

6. Schedule
Notice to Proceed Date: _______________________

5.b
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 50 Estimated Start Date: _______________________
Estimated Completion Date: _______________________
Milestones:

Milestone Date
Contractor shall promptly notify the City of conditions affecting the authorized schedule.

7. Compensation
The City authorizes compensation as follows:
☐ Lump Sum Amount:
$_____________________
☐ Time and Materials Not-to-Exceed Amount:
$_____________________
☐ Unit Price Basis:
$_____________________
☐ Other:

8. Cost Documentation Requirements
Contractor shall provide supporting documentation as required by the Agreement and Exhibit C, including:
• labor records;
• equipment records;
• material invoices;
• subcontractor costs;
• photographs;
• daily reports;
• progress documentation; and
• other records necessary to verify costs.

9. Required Submittals

5.b
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 51 Contractor shall provide the following submittals:
☐ Work plan
☐ Safety plan
☐ Schedule
☐ Cost proposal
☐ Drawings/calculations
☐ Environmental documentation
☐ Permit documentation
☐ Other:

10. Regulatory and Environmental Requirements
Contractor shall comply with applicable requirements established by:
☐ City approvals
☐ California Coastal Commission
☐ Regional Water Quality Control Board
☐ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
☐ California Department of Fish and Wildlife
☐ Other agencies:

11. Funding Documentation Requirements
Contractor shall provide documentation reasonably requested by the City to support reimbursement from:
☐ Cal OES
☐ FEMA
☐ Other funding sources:

5.b
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 52 12. Change Authorization
Changes to this Authorization affecting scope, cost, or schedule require written approval by the City.

Emergency protective actions necessary to protect life, safety, or critical infrastructure may proceed pursuant to the Agreement, provided Contractor provides prompt notice and supporting documentation.

3. Authorization Approval
By signing below, the Parties acknowledge and authorize the Work described in this Phase Authorization.

CITY OF PACIFICA
By: _______________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________
CONTRACTOR: Power Engineering Construction, Co.

By: _______________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________

5.b
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 53 EXHIBIT C

PAYMENT AND COST DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
Emergency Investigation and Stabilization Services. Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stabilization Project

1. General Payment Requirements
Payment to Contractor shall be made only for authorized Work performed in accordance with:
• the Emergency Public Works Agreement;
• applicable Phase Authorizations or Task Orders;
• approved pricing;
• required documentation; and
• applicable funding requirements.

Contractor shall not be entitled to payment for unauthorized Work.

The City reserves the right to withhold payment for costs that are not adequately documented, are not allowable under the Agreement, or cannot be reasonably verified.

2. Basis of Compensation
The City may authorize Work using one or more of the following compensation methods:
☐ Lump Sum
☐ Unit Price
☐ Time and Materials
☐ Cost Plus Fee
☐ Not-to-Exceed Amount
☐ Other approved method:

The applicable Phase Authorization shall identify the compensation method.

3. Cost Documentation Requirements
Contractor shall maintain records sufficient to demonstrate the cost and necessity of all Work.

Documentation shall include, as applicable:

5.b
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 54 • daily activity reports; • labor records; • equipment records; • material invoices; • subcontractor invoices; • supplier invoices; • delivery tickets; • disposal records; • photographs; • progress reports; • schedules; • inspection records; • permits; • agency correspondence; and • other supporting documentation requested by the City.

4. Labor Cost Documentation
For labor charges, Contractor shall provide: • employee name or identifying classification; • labor classification; • hours worked; • dates worked; • location of work; • description of activities performed; • applicable wage rates; • overtime hours; • payroll records; and • applicable fringe benefit information.

5.b
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 55 Labor costs shall be consistent with applicable prevailing wage and labor requirements.

5. Equipment Cost Documentation
Equipment charges shall include:
• equipment description;
• ownership or rental status;
• equipment identification;
• hours used;
• dates used;
• location used;
• purpose of use;
• operator information, if applicable; and
• applicable rates.

Equipment rates shall be based on:
• approved contract rates;
• documented rental rates;
• published industry rates; or
• other rates approved by the City.

6. Material Cost Documentation
Material costs shall be supported by:
• supplier invoices;
• purchase orders;
• delivery tickets;
• quantities delivered;
• quantities incorporated into the Work;
• transportation costs;
• disposal costs, if applicable; and
• evidence of payment.

5.b
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 56 Contractor shall not include unsupported material costs.

7. Subcontractor and Consultant Costs
Contractor shall provide documentation supporting subcontractor and consultant costs, including:
• executed subcontract agreements;
• subcontractor invoices;
• description of services performed;
• labor and equipment backup;
• proof of payment, when requested;
• applicable markups; and
• evidence of compliance with contract requirements.

Contractor remains responsible for verifying subcontractor costs before submitting payment requests.

8. Allowable Markups and Fees
Any markup, overhead, profit, administrative fee, or other compensation factor shall be limited to amounts:
• included in the approved pricing;
• authorized by the Agreement;
• authorized in a Phase Authorization; or
• approved by written change authorization.

No additional markup shall be applied without written City approval.

9. Emergency Work Documentation
For emergency stabilization activities, Contractor shall maintain records demonstrating:
• the emergency condition requiring action;
• the date and time work was initiated;
• the immediate threat addressed;
• alternatives considered, if applicable;
• resources deployed;
• actions taken;

5.b
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 57 • costs incurred; and
• completion status.

10. Progress Payment Requests
Payment requests shall include:
• invoice;
• summary of Work completed;
• percentage of completion, if applicable;
• cost breakdown;
• supporting documentation;
• approved changes;
• schedule update; and
• certification of accuracy.

The City may request additional information before approving payment.

11. Final Payment Documentation
Before final payment, Contractor shall provide:
• final invoice;
• final cost summary;
• completed Work documentation;
• record drawings or documents;
• warranties, if applicable;
• permit closeout documentation;
• unresolved issue list;
• final photographs; and
• other closeout documentation requested by the City.

12. Cost Reasonableness and Audit Review
Contractor acknowledges that project costs may be reviewed by:

5.b
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 58 • the City;
• Cal OES;
• FEMA;
• auditors;
• inspectors;
• grant administrators; and
• other authorized governmental entities.

Contractor shall provide reasonable documentation necessary to demonstrate that costs are:
• necessary;
• reasonable;
• properly supported;
• consistent with the authorized scope; and
• eligible for reimbursement where applicable.

14. Unsupported or Ineligible Costs
The City may reject or withhold payment for costs that:
• were not authorized;
• lack sufficient documentation;
• are inconsistent with the Agreement;
• are unreasonable;
• result from Contractor error or negligence; or
• are otherwise ineligible under applicable funding requirements.

15. Certification of Payment Request
Each payment request submitted by Contractor shall include certification substantially as follows:

Contractor certifies that the costs submitted are accurate, represent Work performed under the Agreement, are supported by appropriate documentation, and have not been previously submitted for payment.

5.b
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 59 EXHIBIT D

INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

INSURANCE

1. At or before the Effective Date, Contractor shall furnish to City satisfactory proof that Contractor has taken out for the entire period covered by the Contract the following classes of insurance in the form and with limits and deductibles specified below, unless otherwise specified in Contract Documents:

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance covering claims for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage arising out of the Work and as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 00

01. Such insurance shall provide for all operations and include independent contractors, products liability, completed operations for one year after Final Completion and acceptance of the final payment for the Work, contractual liability, and coverage for explosion, collapse, and underground hazards. The limits of such insurance shall not be less than [$5,000,000] each occurrence, [$5,000,000] general aggregate limit, and [$5,000,000] aggregate for products and completed operations. The policy shall be endorsed to provide Broad Form Property Damage Coverage.

B. Business/Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles. Such insurance shall provide coverage not less than the standard ISO Business/Commercial Automobile Liability CA 00 01 (or equivalent) with limits not less than [$5,000,000] each accident.

C. All-Risk Course of Construction Insurance including damage to property owned by City, Contractor or third parties caused by fire. Insurance shall be in the amount of 100 percent of the completed value of the Work to be performed under this Contract. Deductible shall not exceed [$10,000]. Each loss shall be borne by Contractor.

D. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance for all persons whom the Contractor may employ in carrying out Work contemplated under Contract Documents, in accordance with the Act of Legislature of State of California, known as “Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Safety Act,” approved May 26, 1913, and all acts amendatory or supplemental thereto, in the statutory amount. The Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 by disease-policy limit, and $1,000,000 by disease-each employee.

E. Environmental Impairment Liability Insurance covering bodily injury and property damage utilizing an occurrence policy form, in an amount no less than [$1,000,000] combined single limit for each occurrence.

F. Maritime Employers Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance under the United States Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act if the work covered by the Contract Agreement includes activities subject to that Act (work whole or in part upon the navigable waters of the United States, including any adjoining pier, wharf, dry dock, terminal, building way, marine railway, or adjoining areas) throughout the duration of the Contract Agreement.

The Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance under the Jones Act in the event that the work covered by the Contract Agreement includes activities covered by the Jones Act (including, but not limited to, work from ships, vessels, barges, or dredges) throughout the duration of the Contract Agreement.

H. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured

5.b
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 60 retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, or the Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses.

2. If Contractor normally carries insurance coverage or in an amount greater than the minimum amounts required by City in Paragraph 1 above., that broader coverage and/or greater amount shall become the minimum required amount of insurance for purposes of the Contract. Therefore, Contractor hereby acknowledges and agrees that all insurance carried by it shall be deemed liability coverage for all actions it performs in connection with the Contract.

3. All policies of insurance shall be placed with insurers acceptable to City. The insurance underwriter(s) for all insurance policies except Workers’ Compensation shall have an A. M. Best Company rating of [A-, VIII] or better, unless otherwise specified in Contract Documents.

Required minimum amounts of insurance may be increased should conditions of Work, in opinion of City, warrant such increase. Contractor shall increase required insurance amounts upon direction by City.

4. Required Endorsements: The required policies (including any umbrella or excess liability policy(ies)) shall be endorsed as follows and provided prior to execution of the Contract Documents.

A. Commercial General Liability Endorsement
Contractor shall furnish to the City the “Commercial General Liability Endorsement” as provided in this Document. The preferred form is a CG 20 10 11 85, but the Contractor may substitute an equivalent alternative endorsement, with prior approval by the City, provided the endorsement references “your work” and contains the following minimum specific components:

1. The insurance policy number.

2. A statement that includes the following language: “The City of Pacifica, including its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, are included as additional insureds.”

3. An endorsement providing the insured's insurance as primary as respects the City of Pacifica and that any other insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Pacifica shall be in excess of the insured's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it.

4. A waiver of subrogation clause and endorsement which states the following:
“This insurance company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Pacifica, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from the work performed by the named insured for the City.”

5. A statement that the policy shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City of Pacifica. If a carrier will not provide the required notice of cancellation, the Contractor shall provide written notice to the City of a cancellation no later than five (5) business days before cancellation.

6. An original, authorized signature.

An alternative to the submission of a CG 20 10 11 85 form is available. A CG 20 10 10 01 or a CG 20 33 10 01 (or similarly worded document) for ongoing operations along with a CG 20 37 10 01 for completed operations will be acceptable in lieu of a CG 20 10 11 85 form.

5.b
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 61 Note: Policies that include endorsement numbers CG 22 94 10 01 and/or CG 22 95 10 01, or have the endorsement wording written into the policy language, are not acceptable.

B. Automobile Liability Special Endorsement
Contractor shall furnish to the City the “Automobile Liability Special Endorsement” as provided in this Document. The Contractor may substitute an equivalent alternative endorsement with prior approval by the City, provided the endorsement contains the following minimum specific components:

1. The insurance policy number.

2. A statement that includes the following language: “The City of Pacifica, including its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, are included as additional insureds.”

3. An endorsement providing the insured's insurance as primary as respects the City of Pacifica and that any other insurance maintained by the City of Pacifica shall be in excess of the insured's insurance, and shall not be called upon to contribute with it.

4. A waiver of subrogation clause and endorsement which states the following:
“This insurance company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Pacifica, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from the work performed by the named insured for the City.”

5. A statement that the policy shall not be canceled except after thirty days prior written notice to the City of Pacifica. If a carrier will not provide the required notice of cancellation, the Contractor shall provide written notice to the City of a cancellation no later than five (5) business days before cancellation.

6. An original, authorized signature.

C. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Special Endorsement Contractor shall furnish to the City the “Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Special Endorsement” as provided in this Document. The Contractor may substitute an alternative endorsement with prior approval by the City, provided the endorsement contains the following minimum specific components:

1. A waiver of subrogation clause and endorsement which states the following:
“This insurance company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Pacifica, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from the work performed by the named insured for the City.”

2. The insurance policy number.

3. A statement that the policy shall not be canceled except after thirty days prior written notice to the City of Pacifica. If a carrier will not provide the required notice of cancellation, the Contractor shall provide written notice to the City of a cancellation no later than five (5) business days before cancellation.

4. An original, authorized signature.

5.b
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 62 As an alternative, the City will accept State Compensation Insurance Fund endorsement documentation in lieu of the form of endorsement provided in this Document 00 7316, provided that the documentation contains State Fund endorsement numbers 2065 and 2570.

D. Each such policy shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limit of the insurance company’s liability required hereunder.

Should any of the policies identified herein contain a “cross-suits” exclusion, such exclusion must not apply to any additional insureds.

E. Contractor or its insurance broker shall submit to City a copy of the “Declarations Page” for each policy identified under Paragraph 1 above. The Declarations Page shall include the name of the insurance carrier, the applicable policy number, the types of coverage and limits of insurance provided, the effective date(s) of the policy, the insurance broker’s name and license number, and a list of all coverage forms and endorsements.

F. Any available insurance coverage and/or proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the City as an additional insured. The requirements for coverage and limits shall be the greater of either the minimum coverage and/or limits specified in this Agreement or the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured.

5. Certificates of insurance and endorsements shall have clearly typed thereon City Contract Number and title of Contract Documents. Written notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage of any policy shall be mailed to City (Attention: City Risk Manager / Purchasing Agent) at the address listed in Document 00 5200 (Agreement), 30 Days in advance of the effective date of the cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage. Written notice of cancellation for nonpayment shall be mailed within 10 Days of cancellation. Contractor shall maintain all insurance in full force and effect during entire period of performance of Contract Documents, including warranty and guarantee periods. However, Contractor may discontinue All-Risk Course of Construction Insurance after Final Payment, and shall maintain General Liability Insurance throughout the entire Extended Term specified Paragraph 1.01 above. At time of making application for extension of time, and during all periods exceeding the Contract Time resulting from any cause, Contractor shall submit evidence that insurance policies will be in effect during requested additional period of time. Upon City’s request, Contractor shall submit to City, within 30 Days, copies of the actual insurance policies or renewals or replacements.

6. Contractor shall pay all insurance premiums, including any charges for required waivers of subrogation or the endorsement of additional insureds. If Contractor fails to maintain insurance, City may take out comparable insurance, and deduct and retain amount of premium from any sums due Contractor under Contract Documents.

7. If injury occurs to any employee of Contractor, Subcontractor or sub-subcontractor for which the employee, or the employee’s dependents in the event of employee’s death, is entitled to compensation from City under provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Safety Act, as amended, or for which compensation is claimed from City, City may retain out of sums due Contractor under Contract Documents, amount sufficient to cover such compensation, as fixed by the Act, as amended, until such compensation is paid, or until it is determined that no compensation is due. If City is compelled to pay compensation, City may, in its discretion, either deduct and retain from the Contract Sum the amount so paid, or require Contractor to reimburse City.

5.b
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 63 8. Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor or any Subcontractor may be held responsible for payment of damages resulting from their operations.

9. Except for Commercial General Liability Insurance, of which Subcontractors need only obtain [$1,000,000] in coverage, all Subcontractors shall maintain the same insurance required to be maintained by Contractor with respect to their portions of the Work unless otherwise indicated in Contract Documents, and Contractor shall cause the Subcontractors to furnish proof thereof to City within ten Days of City’s request.

10. The following provisions apply to any licensed professional engaged by Contractor to perform portions of the Work (Professional).

A. Each Professional shall maintain the following insurance, unless otherwise specified in Contract Documents:

B. Professional Liability Insurance, insuring against professional errors and omissions arising from Professional’s Work on the Project, in an amount not less than [$1,000,000] for each claims and in the aggregate. If Professional cannot provide an occurrence policy, Professional shall provide insurance covering claims made as a result of performance of Work on this Project and shall maintain such insurance in effect for not less than three years following Final Completion of the Project.

1. Professional shall satisfy all other provisions of this Document relating to that insurance, including without limitation providing required insurance certificates of insurance and the required endorsements before commencing its Work on the Project.

RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR AND INDEMNIFICATION

1. City and each of its officers, employees, consultants and agents including, without limitation, the City Council, Project Manager and each City’s Representative, shall not be liable or accountable in any manner for loss or damage that may happen to any part of the Work; loss or damage to materials or other things used or employed in performing the Work; injury, sickness, disease, or death of any person; or damage to property resulting from any cause whatsoever except their sole negligence, willful misconduct or active negligence, attributable to performance or character of the Work, and Contractor releases all of the foregoing persons and entities from any and all such claims.

2. To the furthest extent permitted by law (including, without limitation, Civil Code Section 2782), Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, City and each of its officers, officials, employees, consultants and agents including, without limitation, the City Council, Project Manager and each City’s Representative, from claims, suits, actions, losses and liability of every kind, nature and description including, without limitation, claims and fines of regulatory agencies and attorney’s fees and consultant’s fees, directly or indirectly arising out of, connected with, or resulting from performance of the Work, failure to perform the Work, or condition of the Work that is caused in whole or part by any act or omission of Contractor, Subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, resulting from any cause whatsoever except for liability for loss, damage, or expense arising from City’s sole negligence, willful misconduct, or active negligence.

3. With respect to third-party claims against Contractor, Contractor waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity including, without limitation, costs of defense, against City and each of its officers, officials, employees, consultants and agents including, without limitation, City, the City Council, Project Manager and each City’s Representative. City shall provide timely notice to Contractor of any third-party claim relating to the Contract Documents, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 9201.

5.b
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 64 4. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Contractor, its Subcontractors of any tier, or the officers or agents of any of them.

5. To the furthest extent permitted by law (including, without limitation, Civil Code §2782), the indemnities, releases of liability and limitations of liability, claims procedures, and limitations of remedy expressed throughout Contract Documents shall apply even in the event of breach of Contract, passive negligence, fault or strict liability of the party(ies) indemnified, released, or limited in liability, and shall survive the termination, rescission, breach, abandonment, or completion of the Work or the terms of the Contract Documents. If Contractor fails to perform any of these defense or indemnity obligations, City may in its discretion back charge Contractor for City’s costs and damages resulting therefrom and withhold such sums from progress payments or other Contract moneys which may become due.

5.b
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 65 EXHIBIT E

FEMA / CAL OES DOCUMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS Emergency Investigation and Stabilization Services. Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stabilization Project

1. Purpose and Applicability
The City anticipates that portions of the Project may be funded or reimbursed through emergency assistance, disaster recovery, or other governmental funding programs, including the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (“Cal OES”) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”).

Contractor acknowledges that documentation supporting reimbursement may be required after completion of Work.

Contractor shall provide documentation reasonably requested by the City to support funding applications, reimbursement requests, audits, inspections, and closeout activities.

2. Contractor Responsibility for Documentation
Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records sufficient to demonstrate:
• the nature and extent of Work performed;
• the emergency condition addressed;
• the necessity of the Work;
• the resources used;
• the costs incurred;
• compliance with applicable requirements; and
• completion of authorized activities.

Contractor documentation shall supplement, but not replace, the City’s responsibility for FEMA, Cal OES, or other funding submissions.

3. Emergency Condition Documentation
Contractor shall provide documentation identifying:
• date and location of observed conditions;
• photographs and videos;
• inspection findings;
• structural or geotechnical observations;

5.b
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 66 • immediate threats identified;
• recommended emergency actions;
• work performed to reduce risk; and
• completion documentation.

4. Procurement and Authorization Documentation
Contractor shall cooperate with City documentation requirements related to emergency procurement, including:
• proposal and pricing information;
• scope clarification;
• negotiated pricing documentation;
• qualifications information;
• subcontractor information;
• written authorizations;
• Phase Authorizations;
• Task Orders;
• change directives; and
• approvals for additional Work.

5. Cost Eligibility Documentation
Contractor shall maintain records necessary to support review of project costs, including:
• labor;
• equipment;
• materials;
• subcontractors;
• consultants;
• rentals;
• invoices;
• purchase orders;
• receipts;

5.b
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 67 • delivery records;
• disposal records; and
• payment documentation.

6. Photographic and Video Documentation
Contractor shall provide photographs and video documentation showing:
• existing conditions;
• emergency conditions;
• Work progress;
• completed Work;
• concealed conditions before covering;
• environmental protection measures;
• safety measures; and
• restoration activities.

Photographs shall include sufficient information to identify:
• date;
• location;
• activity shown; and
• relationship to the authorized Work.

7. Daily Reports and Activity Records
Contractor shall maintain daily reports documenting:
• date;
• weather conditions;
• personnel present;
• equipment used;
• materials delivered;
• Work performed;
• inspections;

5.b
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 68 • visitors;
• delays;
• unusual conditions; and
• safety or environmental issues.

Daily reports shall be provided to the City upon request.

8. Change Documentation
Contractor shall provide documentation supporting changes to authorized Work, including:
• reason for change;
• emergency justification, if applicable;
• revised scope;
• cost impacts;
• schedule impacts;
• alternatives considered;
• authorization received; and
• completion documentation.

9. Environmental and Regulatory Documentation
Contractor shall maintain and provide documentation relating to:
• permits;
• agency approvals;
• environmental reviews;
• mitigation measures;
• monitoring;
• inspections;
• agency communications; and
• compliance actions.

10. Labor Compliance Documentation
Contractor shall maintain documentation necessary to demonstrate compliance with applicable labor requirements, including:

5.b
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 69 • certified payroll;
• labor classifications;
• wage information;
• apprenticeship records, where applicable;
• subcontractor labor records; and
• labor compliance certifications.

11. Insurance and Risk Documentation
Contractor shall maintain and provide:
• certificates of insurance;
• endorsements;
• notices of claims;
• incident reports;
• property damage reports;
• safety reports; and
• other risk-related documentation.

12. Inspection and Audit Cooperation
Contractor shall cooperate with inspections, audits, reviews, and inquiries conducted by:
• City representatives;
• Cal OES;
• FEMA;
• state or federal auditors;
• regulatory agencies; and
• authorized representatives.

Contractor shall provide access to:
• project records;
• personnel;
• subcontractors;

5.b
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 70 • work areas;
• equipment; and
• supporting documentation.

13. Duplication of Benefits
Contractor shall notify the City if Contractor becomes aware of any potential duplication of payment, reimbursement, grant funding, insurance recovery, or other compensation related to the authorized Work.

14. Segregation of Emergency Restoration Costs
In every cost proposal, guaranteed maximum price or not-to-exceed submission, and payment request, Contractor shall separately identify and segregate the costs associated with:
(a) Emergency Protective Measures, including:
• immediate stabilization;
• temporary protection;
• emergency access;
• prevention of further damage;
• public safety measures; and
(b) Permanent, Intermediate, or Betterment Work, including any permanent reconstruction, corrosion allowance, thicker or reinforced sections, protective coatings, corrosion sleeves, encasement, or other elements that extend beyond restoring the affected facility to its pre-event kind, quality, and function.

This segregation shall be maintained from the outset of the Work so that reimbursable emergency work and non-reimbursable permanent or betterment work can be tracked separately for the City's Cal OES/CDAA and insurance purposes. The City may withhold payment for costs that are not so segregated until the segregation is provided.

15. Record Retention
Contractor shall retain FEMA, Cal OES, and Project-related documentation for the period required by:
• applicable law;
• the Agreement;
• City requirements; and
• funding agency requirements.

5.b
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 71 Contractor shall not destroy project records without confirmation that the applicable retention period has expired.

16. Contractor Certification
Upon request by the City, Contractor shall certify that submitted documentation:
• is accurate;
• relates to authorized Work;
• is supported by available records;
• has not been knowingly misrepresented; and
• is provided in good faith.

17. No Guarantee of Funding Eligibility
Contractor acknowledges that the City, Cal OES, FEMA, and other funding agencies determine eligibility and reimbursement decisions. Nothing in this Exhibit guarantees reimbursement or funding approval. Contractor remains responsible for providing complete and accurate documentation supporting the City’s applications and reimbursement requests.

5.b
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 72 EXHIBIT F

EMERGENCY DIRECTIVE / CHANGE ORDER FORM
Emergency Investigation and Stabilization Services. Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stabilization Project

1. General Information
Project:

Emergency Investigation, Stabilization of Pacifica Pier and Adjacent Public Infrastructure Agreement Date: _______________________
Contractor: ____________________________
Emergency Directive / Change Order No.: ___________________ Date Issued: ___________________________
Phase Authorization / Task Order No.: ___________________

2. Type of Authorization
This document constitutes:
☐ Emergency Directive – Immediate action required to protect life, safety, property, or critical public infrastructure
☐ Change Order – Modification to previously authorized Work ☐ Field Authorization – Direction pending formal change documentation ☐ Other:

3. Reason for Directive or Change
The City hereby authorizes or directs the following action:

The basis for this Directive or Change includes:
☐ Emergency condition
☐ Unforeseen site condition
☐ Regulatory requirement

5.b
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 73 ☐ Safety requirement
☐ Design clarification
☐ Changed field condition
☐ Public protection requirement
☐ Other:

4. Description of Authorized Additional or Modified Work Contractor shall perform the following Work:

The Contractor shall not perform additional Work beyond this authorization without further written approval, except as necessary for immediate protection of life, safety, or critical infrastructure.

5. Cost Adjustment
The adjustment to contract compensation is:
☐ Increase
☐ Decrease
☐ No cost adjustment
Amount:
$________________________
Revised Contract Amount:
$________________________

6. Pricing Basis
The cost adjustment is based upon:
☐ Existing contract unit prices
☐ Lump sum proposal
☐ Time and materials
☐ Negotiated cost

5.b
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 74 ☐ Other approved basis:

7. Required Cost Support
Contractor shall provide supporting documentation, including:
☐ Labor records
☐ Equipment records
☐ Material invoices
☐ Subcontractor costs
☐ Supplier documentation
☐ Photographs
☐ Daily reports
☐ Other:

8. Schedule Adjustment
The authorized schedule adjustment is:
☐ No change
☐ Extension of:
______ calendar days
☐ Other:

Revised completion date:

Contractor shall provide updated schedule information reflecting the impact of this Directive or Change.

9. Environmental and Regulatory Review
This Directive or Change:
☐ Does not affect environmental or regulatory requirements ☐ Requires additional agency coordination

5.b
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 75 ☐ Requires additional permits or approvals
☐ Requires environmental review or documentation
Required actions:

10. Funding Documentation
This Directive or Change shall be documented for potential reimbursement through:
☐ Cal OES
☐ FEMA
☐ Other funding source:

Contractor shall provide supporting documentation required by Exhibit E.

11. Contractor Acknowledgment
By signing below, Contractor acknowledges:
• receipt of this Directive or Change;
• understanding of the authorized Work;
• obligation to maintain required documentation;
• obligation to comply with all Agreement requirements; and • responsibility to identify impacts to cost, schedule, safety, and compliance.

Contractor’s signature does not waive any rights available under the Agreement or applicable law.

12. City Authorization

CITY OF PACIFICA
By: _______________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________

13. Contractor Acceptance

5.b
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 76 CONTRACTOR: Power Engineering Construction, Co.

By: _______________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________

14. Supporting Attachments
Attached: ☐ Cost proposal ☐ Revised schedule ☐ Drawings/sketches ☐ Photographs ☐ Technical memorandum ☐ Agency correspondence ☐ Other:

5.b
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 77 Exhibit G

FEMA FEDERAL FUNDING CONTRACT PROVISIONS
A. Equal Employment Opportunity
During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:
(1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
(2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
(3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant.

This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information.
(4) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the contractor's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
(5) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (6) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
(7) In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with

5.b
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 78 procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(8) The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. The applicant further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work: Provided, that if the applicant so participating is a state or local government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality or subdivision of such government which does not participate in work on or under the contract. The applicant agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance. The applicant further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the applicant agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the administering agency may take any or all of the following actions: Cancel, terminate, or suspend in whole or in part this grant (contract, loan, insurance, guarantee); refrain from extending any further assistance to the applicant under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from such applicant; and refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.

B. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
Compliance with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. (1) Overtime requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic

5.b
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 79 receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek. (2) Violation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in 29 C.F.R. § 5.5(b)(1), the contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in 29 C.F.R. §

5.5(b)(1), in the sum of $27 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in 29 C.F.R. § 5.5(b)(1). (3) Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages. The City of Pacifica shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime contractor, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in 29 C.F.R. § 5.5(b)(2). (4) Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in 29 C.F.R. § 5.5(b)(1)-(4) and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in 29 C.F.R. §

5.5(b)(1)-(4).

C. Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act i. Clean Air Act

1. The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.

2. The contractor agrees to report each violation to the City of Pacifica and understands and agrees that the City of Pacifica will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.

3. The contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with federal assistance provided by FEMA. ii. Federal Water Pollution Control Act

1. The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.

2. The contractor agrees to report each violation to the City of Pacifica and understands and agrees that the City of Pacifica will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure

5.b
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 80 notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.

3. The contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with federal assistance provided by FEMA.

D. Suspension and Debarment
(1) This contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R. Part 180 and 2 C.F.R. Part 3000. As such, the contractor is required to verify that none of the contractor’s principals (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.995) or its affiliates (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.935). (2) The contractor must comply with 2 C.F.R. Part 180, subpart C and 2C.F.R. Part 3000, subpart C, and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into.
(3) This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by City of Pacifica. If it is later determined that the contractor did not comply with 2 C.F.R. Part 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. Part 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to City of Pacifica, the federal government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment.
(4) The bidder or proposer agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 C.F.R. Part 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. Part 3000, subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer. The bidder or proposer further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions.

E. Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment
Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment, 31 U.S.C. § 1352 (as amended) Contractors who apply or bid for an award of more than $100,000 shall file the required certification. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used federally appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with obtaining any federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Each tier shall also disclose any lobbying with non-federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient who in turn will forward the certification(s) to the federal awarding agency.

Required Certification. If applicable, contractors must sign and submit to the non-federal entity the following certification:

APPENDIX A, 44 C.F.R. PART 18 – CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a

5.b
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 81 Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S.C. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

The Contractor, _______________, certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the Contractor understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Chap. 38, Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements, apply to this certification and disclosure, if any. ________________________________________
Signature of Contractor’s Authorized Official
________________________________________
Name and Title of Contractor’s Authorized Official
_________________
Date
F. Procurement of Recovered Materials
i. In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired—
• Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule;
• Meeting contract performance requirements; or
• At a reasonable price.

5.b
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 82 ii. Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines webpage:
https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive- procurement-guideline-cpg-program. iii. The Contractor also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act.

G. Prohibition on Contracting for Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services Prohibition on Contracting for Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services (a) Definitions. As used in this clause, the terms backhaul; covered foreign country; covered telecommunications equipment or services; interconnection arrangements; roaming; substantial or essential component; and telecommunications equipment or services have the meaning as defined in FEMA Policy 405-143-1, Prohibitions on Expending FEMA Award Funds for Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services (Interim), as used in this clause—
(b) Prohibitions.
(1) Section 889(b) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. No. 115-232, and 2 C.F.R. § 200.216 prohibit the head of an executive agency on or after Aug.13, 2020, from obligating or expending grant, cooperative agreement, loan, or loan guarantee funds on certain telecommunications products or from certain entities for national security reasons. (2) Unless an exception in paragraph (c) of this clause applies, the contractor and its subcontractors may not use grant, cooperative agreement, loan, or loan guarantee funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to:
(i) Procure or obtain any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology of any system;
(ii) Enter into, extend, or renew a contract to procure or obtain any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology of any system; (iii) Enter into, extend, or renew contracts with entities that use covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system; or
(iv) Provide, as part of its performance of this contract, subcontract, or other contractual instrument, any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system.
(c) Exceptions.
(1) This clause does not prohibit contractors from providing— (i) A service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements; or

5.b
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 83 (ii) Telecommunications equipment that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles. (2) By necessary implication and regulation, the prohibitions also do not apply to:
(i) Covered telecommunications equipment or services that:
i. Are not used as a substantial or essential component of any system; and ii. Are not used as critical technology of any system.
(ii) Other telecommunications equipment or services that are not considered covered telecommunications equipment or services.
(d) Reporting requirement.
(1) In the event the contractor identifies covered telecommunications equipment or services used as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system, during contract performance, or the contractor is notified of such by a subcontractor at any tier or by any other source, the contractor shall report the information in paragraph (d)(2) of this clause to the recipient or subrecipient, unless elsewhere in this contract are established procedures for reporting the information.
(2) The Contractor shall report the following information pursuant to paragraph (d)(1) of this clause:
(i) Within one business day from the date of such identification or notification: The contract number; the order number(s), if applicable; supplier name; supplier unique entity identifier (if known); supplier Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code (if known); brand; model number (original equipment manufacturer number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number); item description; and any readily available information about mitigation actions undertaken or recommended.
(ii) Within 10 business days of submitting the information in paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this clause:

Any further available information about mitigation actions undertaken or recommended. In addition, the contractor shall describe the efforts it undertook to prevent use or submission of covered telecommunications equipment or services, and any additional efforts that will be incorporated to prevent future use or submission of covered telecommunications equipment or services.
(e) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (e), in all subcontracts and other contractual instruments.

H. Domestic Preferences for Procurements
Domestic Preference for Procurements
As appropriate, and to the extent consistent with law, the contractor should, to the greatest extent practicable, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States. This includes, but is not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products.

For purposes of this clause:

5.b
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 84 Produced in the United States means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States.

Manufactured products mean items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber.

I. Compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act
a. All transactions regarding this contract shall be done in compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 31413144, and 3146-3148) and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. pt. 5 as may be applicable. The contractor shall comply with 40 U.S.C. 3141- 3144, and 3146-3148 and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. pt. 5 as applicable. b. Contractors are required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor.
c. Additionally, contractors are required to pay wages not less than once a week.

J. Compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act.
a. Contractor. The contractor shall comply with 18 U.S.C. § 874, 40 U.S.C. § 3145, and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. pt. 3 as may be applicable, which are incorporated by reference into this contract.
b. Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clause above and such other clauses as FEMA may by appropriate instructions require, and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all of these contract clauses. c. Breach. A breach of the contract clauses above may be grounds for termination of the contract, and for debarment as a contractor and subcontractor as provided in 29 C.F.R. § 5.12.

K. Access to Records
The following access to records requirements apply to this contract:
(1) The Contractor agrees to provide the City of Pacifica, the FEMA Administrator, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their authorized representatives access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor which are directly

5.b
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 85 pertinent to this contract for the purposes of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions.
(2) The Contractor agrees to permit any of the foregoing parties to reproduce by any means whatsoever or to copy excerpts and transcriptions as reasonably needed. (3) The Contractor agrees to provide the FEMA Administrator or his authorized representatives access to construction or other work sites pertaining to the work being completed under the contract.
(4) In compliance with the Disaster Recovery Act of 2018, the City of Pacifica and the Contractor acknowledge and agree that no language in this contract is intended to prohibit audits or internal reviews by the FEMA Administrator or the Comptroller General of the United States.

L. DHS SEAL, LOGO, AND FLAGS
The contractor shall not use the DHS seal(s), logos, crests, or reproductions of flags or likenesses of DHS agency officials without specific FEMA pre-approval.

M. COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW, REGULATIONS, AND EXECUTIVE ORDERS
This is an acknowledgement that FEMA financial assistance will be used to fund all or a portion of the contract. The contractor will comply with all applicable Federal law, regulations, executive orders, FEMA policies, procedures, and directives.

N. NO OBLIGATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
The Federal Government is not a party to this contract and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the non-Federal entity, contractor, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the contract.

O. PROGRAM FRAUD AND FALSE OR FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS OR

RELATED ACTS
The Contractor acknowledges that 31 U.S.C. Chap. 38 (Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements) applies to the Contractor’s actions pertaining to this contract.

P. PROHIBITED CONTRACT TYPES; TIME-AND-MATERIALS CEILING; COST

REASONABLENESS
Consistent with 2 C.F.R. § 200.324 and 41 U.S.C. § 3905(a), the cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost and percentage-of-construction-cost methods of contracting shall not be used for any Work funded in whole or in part by a federal award, and the Contractor shall not enter into any costplus-a-percentage-of-cost subcontract. Where the City authorizes Work on a time-and-materials

5.b
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City 86 basis, such authorization is permitted only where no other contract type is suitable, each such authorization shall include a ceiling price (not-to-exceed amount) that the Contractor exceeds at its own risk, and the City shall exercise a degree of oversight sufficient to ensure that the Contractor is using efficient methods and effective cost controls. The Contractor shall maintain records sufficient to demonstrate that all costs charged are necessary, reasonable, allocable, and adequately documented, and that procurement of subcontracted Work provided competition to the extent practicable under the circumstances of the emergency.

5.b
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City

SWINERTON-POWER
a joint venture
1501 Viking Street, Suite 200 | Alameda, CA 94501 | tel: (510)337-3800 | fax: (510)337-3808 | www.PowerEngConstruction.com

EMERGENCY INVESTIGATION

AND STABILIZATION SERICES

PACIFICA PIER, BEACH BOULEVARD, AND UTILITY STABLIZATION JANUARY 29, 2026

CITY OF PACIFICA

PROPOSAL

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City T 510-337-3800 E [email protected] W POWERENGCONSTRUCTION.COM 1501 VIKING STREET, SUITE 200, ALAMEDA, CA 94501 July 24, 2026
Melissa Tigbao, Public Works Director
City of Pacifica
170 Santa Maria Avenue
Pacifica, CA 94044
Subject: Proposal for Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stabilization Project Dear Mrs. Tigbao,
Power Engineering Construction Co. is pleased to submit this proposal for the Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stabilization Project. The City has identified emergency conditions affecting the pier, shoreline, Beach Boulevard, and adjacent utilities that require immediate investigation, engineering, and stabilization to protect critical public infrastructure and public safety. Our team offers a practical, cost-conscious approach focused on rapidly evaluating site conditions, developing constructible solutions, and safely executing the work in a phased manner consistent with the City’s objectives.

Since 1986, Power Engineering Construction has delivered complex marine and waterfront projects throughout California, including emergency response, shoreline stabilization, design-build delivery, and over-water construction.

Our experience includes rehabilitation work at Pacifica Pier, an emergency repair at Beach Boulevard, the recent emergency stabilization of Port of San Francisco Dry Dock No. 2, emergency wharf repairs at Capitola, and the Santa Cruz Wharf Reinforcement Project, all requiring rapid mobilization and construction in active coastal environments..

Based in Alameda, we bring a complete in-house workforce, a fleet of marine equipment, ADCI-certified commercial dive teams, and the resources to self-perform the critical marine and heavy civil construction elements of this project.

Our workforce of more than 140 craft professionals, engineers, managers, and estimators allows us to maintain direct control of safety, quality, schedule, and cost while responding quickly to changing site conditions.

The project team is built around long-standing partners with direct experience in marine construction, pier rehabilitation, shoreline stabilization, and emergency waterfront repairs. Power Engineering Construction will serve as the Prime Contractor, supported by Liftech Consultants for structural engineering and temporary works, ENGEO for geotechnical engineering, Coast & Harbor Engineering for offshore wave analysis, and Scott Holmes, former Pacifica City Engineer, as a consultant providing historical knowledge of the Pacifica Pier structure and prior repairs.

Thank you for considering Power Engineering Construction Co. for this important project. Our team is immediately available to mobilize and begin work upon authorization.

Very Truly Yours,
Power Engineering Construction Co.

David Mik

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City

TABLE OF

CONTENTS

TEAM ORGANIZATION AND QUALIFICATIONS

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

TECHNICAL APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT CHALLENGES

PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE

KEY PERSONNEL AND PROJECT ROLES

PROJECT RISKS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES

COST PROPOSAL

SCHEDULE OF RATES

CONTRACT EXCEPTIONS

PROPOSER CERTIFICATIONS AND REQUIRED DECLARATIONS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

SECTION
01 02
03 04
05 06
07 08
09 10
11 SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project Provide a description of the proposer’s organization, ownership, structure, relevant licenses, and qualifications of the firm and proposed project team. The proposer shall identify the entity that will serve as the prime contractor and identify all proposed sucontractors, consultants, and major suppliers anticipated to perform the work.

Power Engineering Construction Co. (Power) will serve as the Prime Contractor and will have overall responsibility for project management, engineering coordination, construction, quality control, safety, scheduling, commercial diving operations, and subcontractor management for the Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stabilization Project.

Power is a California corporation headquartered in Alameda, California, specializing in marine and heavy civil construction since 1986. The firm holds California Contractor’s License A/B/HAZ No. 488215 and California DIR Registration No. 1000007181.

The proposed project team combines experienced marine construction personnel with specialty engineering consultants and subcontractors providing the structural, geotechnical, coastal, environmental, and construction services needed to investigate, design, and construct the emergency stabilization improvements. The firms and proposed individuals have worked together on waterfront and coastal infrastructure projects throughout California for decades.

CORE PROJECT TEAM

FIRM ROLE
Power Engineering Construction Co. Prime Contractor
Liftech Consultants, Inc. Structural Engineer
ENGEO Geotechnical Engineer
Coast & Harbor Engineering Coastal Engineer
Scott Holmes. PE, former Pacifica City Engineer Consultant with historical knowledge of location and structure

TEAM QUALIFICATIONS
Power Engineering Construction Co. Power bring 40 years as a marine and heavy civil contractor that specializes in emergency response, waterfront infrastructure, shoreline stabilization, commercial diving, pile driving, and complex public works projects throughout California. The firm’s organization integrates project management, field engineering, construction supervision, commercial diving, quality control, and safety under a single management structure to support rapid mobilization and execution of emergency work.

Liftech Consultants Inc. Founded in 1964, Liftech Consultants Inc. provides structural engineering for wharves, piers, ferry terminals, and other marine infrastructure. The firm’s expertise includes structural assessment, seismic evaluation, rehabilitation, heavy temporary loading, and design of new waterfront facilities. Liftech develops practical, constructible solutions for deteriorated marine structures, emergency stabilization, and complex waterfront construction projects.
4 4
SECTION 02 NARRATIVE OF APPROACH
01 SECTION

TEAM ORGANIZATION AND

QUALIFICATIONS

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project ENGEO Brings more than 50 years of experience in geotechnical, coastal, civil, and environmental engineering for piers, waterfront facilities, and critical public infrastructure. Its services include subsurface investigation, shoreline and bluff stabilization, scour and erosion assessment, emergency response, permitting support, foundation evaluation, construction-phase engineering, and development of practical stabilization measures for complex coastal and nearshore conditions.

Coast & Harbor Engineering (CHE) is a specialized coastal engineering firm with more than 23 years of experience in coastal processes analysis, beach morphology assessment, shoreline protection design, coastal engineering analysis supporting the design and repair of piers, wharves, seawalls, and bulkheads, and coastal restoration. CHE provides planning, physical and numerical modeling, design, and construction support for coastal and marine infrastructure, including wave and hydrodynamic analysis, shoreline and revetment design, and emergency storm damage response for ports, municipalities, and state agencies.

Scott Holmes, PE, former Pacifica City Engineer, will provide project-specific advisory support based on his direct knowledge of the Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and local infrastructure. His experience includes prior abutment repairs involving the soil-cement wall and exterior shotcrete, repairs and upgrades to the Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) seawall along Beach Boulevard, and familiarity with active and abandoned utilities on the pier and within Beach Boulevard. He also brings an understanding of Pacifica’s coastal development requirements, permitting and regulatory oversight.

POTENTIAL SUBCONTRACTOR SCOPES
Sawcutting
Asphalt paving
Flatwork / concrete placement
Rebar installation
Environmental monitoring during construction
Special inspection
Photogrammatic Aerial Drone Survey
5 5
SECTION 02 NARRATIVE OF APPROACH
01 SECTION

TEAM ORGANIZATION AND

QUALIFICATIONS

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project 6 SECTION 02 RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION ROLE COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Pacifica Fishing Pier
Rehabilitation
Customer: City of Pacifica
Location: Pacifica, CA
Cost: $500K
Power repaired deteriorated concrete on the underside of the more than 900-foot-long Pacifica Municipal Fishing Pier while working within an active, high-energy surf zone.

Because conventional access was not practical, Power developed specialized means and methods to safely reach and repair the underside of the pier under changing wave and tide conditions. Power also worked collaboratively with the City to evaluate existing conditions, refine repair priorities, and maximize the amount of work completed within the available funding.

The project provides direct familiarity with the Pacifica Pier, its coastal environment, restricted access, aggressive wave exposure, concrete deterioration, and the constructability challenges associated with performing work beneath an operating pier.

Power Engineering Construction
Prime Contractor
Self-Performed Marine Access and
Concrete Repairs
2002 9 Pacifica Pier Site Experience
9 Active Coastal and Surf-Zone
9 Concrete Pier Inspection and
Repair
9 Difficult Underside Access
9 Existing-Condition Evaluation
9 Constructability/Repair
Prioritization
9 Cost-Conscious Scope Development

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Pacifica Beach Boulevard
Emergency Seawall Repair
Customer: City of Pacifica
Location: Pacifica, CA
Cost: $308K
Power performed emergency repairs to a failed seawall and sinkhole threatening Beach Boulevard and the public promenade following severe El Niño storm damage. The work included demolition of the damaged seawall, installation of temporary coastal protection, reconstruction of a 40-foot reinforced concrete seawall with new tiebacks, placement of shotcrete, reconstruction of the wave deflector, replacement of riprap, and restoration of the failed area.

The project required rapid mobilization, construction within the active tidal zone, implementation of temporary protection measures, and completion of emergency shoreline stabilization while preventing additional erosion and protecting adjacent public infrastructure Power Engineering Construction
Prime Contractor
Self-Performed Emergency Marine
and Shoreline Construction
2016 9 Emergency Response
9 Shoreline Stabilization
9 Seawall Reconstruction
9 Scour and Erosion Protection
9 Protection of Public Infrastructure
9 City of Pacifica Experience

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Port of San Francisco Dry Dock
No. 2 Emergency Stabilization
Customer: Port of SF
Location: San Francisco, CA
Cost: $8,596,187
Power responded to an emergency condition after severe storms caused Dry Dock No. 2 to take on water and list, creating an imminent risk of structural failure. The team rapidly mobilized to stabilize the dry dock by controlling water intrusion, implementing temporary stabilization measures, and preventing further deterioration while planning for subsequent demolition and removal.

The project required immediate emergency response, evaluation of deteriorated marine infrastructure, development of practical stabilization measures, and execution of work in a complex waterfront environment under rapidly changing conditions.

Power Engineering Construction
Prime Contractor
100% Self-Performed
2026 (ongoing)9 Emergency Response
9 Marine Structure Stabilization
9 Storm Damage Response
9 Existing Condition Assessment
9 Rapid Mobilization
9 Protection of Critical Infrastructure

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE WETA Central Bay Operations
& Maintenance Terminal
Customer: Water Emergency
Transportation Authority
Location: Alameda, CA
Cost: $54,442,318
This project is an exampe of a collaborative design-build effort with the same proposed team as Pacifica Pier; Power Engineering Construction, Liftech Consultants, and ENGEO.

The WETA Operations & Maintenance Ferry Terminal was the Design-Build of a multi-story landside building together with a vast floating dock structure. In addition to accommodating day-to-day ferry operations, the facility can withstand a seismic event and function as an Emergency Operations Center.

The marine structure includes 14,000 square feet of concrete and steel floats. It provides berthing for 12 large vessels, each with hook ups to 10 different utilities (shore power, lighting, sewer, bilge water, potable water, compressed air, fire suppression, communications, fuel oil, lube oil, and waste oil). Additionally, the project encompasses a reinforced concrete pier, a gangway, and a concrete seawall.

Power Engineering Construction
Design-Build Prime Contractor
2021 9 Emergency Response
9 Wharf Stabilization
9 Temporary Shoring and Jacking
9 Structural Investigation and Repair
9 Public Access Maintenance
9 Agency Coordination

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Subsea Cable Scour Repair
Customer: Confidential
Location: San Francisco Bay,
CA
Cost: $4,204,776
Power performed scour mitigation to protect an exposed subsea electrical transmission cable identified as a critical component of Northern California’s power grid. The work included diver installation of a cable protection system and articulated concrete mattresses over approximately 1,200 feet of exposed cable to prevent additional scour, erosion, and impact damage.

The project required specialized marine construction, surface-supplied diving operations, barge-supported construction, precise work within strong tidal currents and active shipping lanes, and coordination with regulatory agencies and vessel traffic control to protect critical utility infrastructure.

Power Engineering Construction
Prime Contractor
100% Self-Performed
2025 9 Scour Mitigation
9 Utility Infrastructure Protection
9 Strong Current Operations
9 Critical Infrastructure Protection

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project 7

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Santa Cruz Wharf
Reinforcement
Customer: City of Santa Cruz
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Cost: $1.09M
Power reinforced the existing timber pile-supported Santa Cruz Wharf to improve structural capacity and extend its service life. The work included driving twenty-six new 14-inch timber piles, replacing damaged timber piles, decking, stringers, and galvanized steel T-straps, installing under-deck tie rod connections, diver-supported pile removal, and construction of temporary over-water scaffolding to provide access beneath the wharf.

The project required specialized marine construction methods, pile driving, underdeck structural repairs, environmental monitoring, and coordination to maintain safe public access while completing work ahead of schedule.

Power Engineering Construction
Prime Contractor
100% Self-Performed
2023 9 Emergency Response
9 Existing Wharf Reinforcement
9 Underdeck Structural Repairs
9 Temporary Over-Water Access
9 Structural Rehabilitation
9 Environmental Compliance
9 Public Access Maintenance

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Crissy Field Storm Drain
Outfall Repair
Customer: Caltrans
Location: San Francisco, CA
Cost: $2.42M
Power repaired and extended a damaged storm drain outfall at Crissy Field after coastal erosion exposed and compromised the existing pipeline. The work included replacing approximately 170 feet of an existing 42-inch HDPE outfall and extending the pipeline an additional 296 feet to discharge beyond the active erosion zone.

The project required marine construction within a dynamic shoreline environment, specialized access, protection of critical public infrastructure, and execution of work in tidal conditions while maintaining environmental compliance. Power self-performed the majority of the work as the prime contractor.

Power Engineering Construction
Prime Contractor
100% Self-Performed
2015 9 Emergency Coastal Repair
9 Shoreline Construction
9 Utility Protection and Repair
9 Public Infrastructure Protection
9 Environmental Compliance

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE McNears Beach Pier Repair
for Barge Damage and Seismic
Upgrade
Customer: County Marin
Location: Marin County, CA
Design Value: $250K
During a storm, a 100’ by 400’ barge broke its mooring and collided with the pier damaging about half of the pier structure including failure of many pile-to-pile cap connections. Work was performed as an emergency repair on an aggressive schedule.

Liftech was the responsible engineer for the work. We directed and participated in the damage review, developed repair concepts with the contractors (JV), and designed repairs including new piles, new pile caps and a new innovative flexible pile-to-cap connection that significantly improved earthquake performance.

Liftech Consultants Inc.

Structural Engineer
2010 9 Emergency Response
9 Pier Stabilization
9 Utilities Critical Infrastructure
9 Public Infrastructure Protection
9 Accelerated Schedule for
9 Emergency Conditions

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Port of Oakland Wharf
Soffitt Condition Review and
Assessment
Customer: Port of Oakland
Location: Oakland, CA
Design Value: $60K
Liftech was retained under emergency conditions due to the severe corrosion damage to the wharf deck soffits at Berths 35-38 and 60-63, most of which were experiencing large container handling equipment loadings.

Liftech immediately reviewed the damage conditions from a boat, performed structural analysis and assessment by performing yield line analyses of the various wharf soffit locations and various damage conditions to determine acceptable deck load limits, and provided detailed recommendations to the Port on damage status and allowable deck load limits. Operations were able to continue without costly disruptions.

Deliverables: Report of soffit conditions including extent of damage and damage locations, analysis results, findings in the form of allowable deck loads, and recommendations regarding the load limits and corrosion repairs.

Liftech Consultants Inc.

Structural Engineer
2025 9 Emergency Response
9 Coastal/Marine/Pier Stabilization
9 Utilities Critical Infrastructure
9 Public Infrastructure Protection
9 Accelerated Schedule for

PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION COMPLETED RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Emergency Infill of Cook’s
Crack Sea Cave
Customer: City of San Diego
Location: San Diego, CA
Contract Value: $336K
ENGEO was retained by the City of San Diego to evaluate and support emergency stabilization of Cook’s Crack Sea Cave beneath Coast Boulevard in La Jolla after extensive roadway cracking raised concerns about subsurface instability.

ENGEO reassessed the cave geometry and stability, identified erosion along the fault, loss of supporting soil above the cave, and changes indicating the potential for near-future failure of the sea cave’s rock roof and that piping of the sandy soil above the cave was occurring causing lost ground above the cave. ENGEO recommended that the City stabilize the Cook’s Crack sea cave by infilling the cave with an erodible concrete mix similar in strength to the surrounding formation rock. The City approved the emergency infilling of the Cook’s Crack sea cave with erodible cement-sand slurry.

ENGEO 2019 9 Emergency Response
9 Coastal/Marine/Pier Stabilization
9 Utilities Critical Infrastructure
9 Public Infrastructure Protection
9 Accelerated Schedule for
SECTION 02 RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
SCHEDULE ONECONTINUEDCONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project Provide a description of the proposer’s understanding of the Project objectives, site constraints, anticipated risks, emergency conditions, regulatory requirements, and proposed approach to completing the Work.

The proposal should address: investigation approach; stabilization strategy; construction sequencing; public safety measures; utility coordination; environmental and permitting considerations; and approach to maintaining schedule.

SUMMARY
The scope of work consists of a phased approach of
emergency investigation and stabilization of Beach
Boulevard, surrounding utilities, and the Pacifica
Pier. Recent storm damage and long term structural
degradation have resulted in significant structural
distress of the pier and landside abutment presenting an immediate threat to public infrastructure and facilities.

Urgent stabilization efforts are necessary to prevent
additional damage and erosion.

To prepare this proposal Power Engineering has
thoroughly reviewed the project site field conditions, RFQ materials, original construction drawings and contractor methods, and photographs of current conditions. We
have gathered lessons from previous experience working
on the Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard’s Seawall, and
many other emergency civil and marine shoring projects
to evaluate a stabilization and repair approach. We
formed a Design/Build team with two trusted partners
with whom we have completed a number of design/
build projects; our team includes Power Engineering
Construction Company, Liftech Consultants Inc, and
Engeo, Inc. Combined, our team has decades of
experience in all aspects required of this project.

We understand City of Pacifica’s primary goal is
protection of the public, followed by preservation
of Beach Boulevard infrastructure. This includes
sewer, power, water, and other utilities that could be
compromised with further movement of the inshore
structure. We recognize the urgency of this project, but also the importance of fully evaluating the site to identify the most cost-effective solution for the City’s intended future use of the facility.

The primary focus of this project is stabilization, but we foresee opportunity for temporary stabilization structures to be integrated into a future permanent improvements
offering more value to the stabilization approach.

Although not in scope, we have included an example on
the last sheet of concept drawing set that permanently
incorporates our proposed Phase 1 stabilization and
Phase 2 shoring to produce a renewed access pier
access strategy. We anticipate forming a transparent
partnership with the City, and will remain flexible
progressing through site investigation, design, permitting, and construction of stabilization efforts.

From our site investigation we understand the current
inshore structure is significantly cracked and rotationally settling. We suspect the original constructed sheet pile wall from 1973 has deteriorated and in combination
with storm events reached a point of failure just below mudline. In combination, the 1993 retrofit reinforced
concrete wall and slurry gravity wall are failing or
globally rotating due to a lack of base support. This
movement has produced cracking seen on top surface
and sides of the abutment raising concern for soil
retention. The rotational settlement has lowered the
elevation of the supporting landside abutment for the
pier’s first span resulting in structural damage to the piles, pile cap closure pour, and handrails at Bent B.

The currently compromised structures present a hazard
for losing retention of soil at Beach Boulevard as well inducing a progressive collapse of the pier West of the first span. The City efficiently responded by closing the pier, demolishing the topside structure and restroom,
and installing temporary rip rap in efforts to restrain the inshore structure. Additional actions are needed to further stabilize Beach Boulevard and the first pier span. 8 8
SECTION 02 NARRATIVE OF APPROACH
03 SECTION TECHNICAL APPROACH

AND UNDERSTANDING OF

PROJECT CHALLENGES

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project This site presents many challenges. First and foremost, Pacifica is on the Western exposed face of the Pacific
and subject to some of the harshest storm conditions
on the coast. The predicted impacts of a strong El Nino winter elevate concerns with larger than normal surf,
wave heights, and frequency of winter storms. The
current cracking and settling of the inshore structure
leave the area vulnerable to erosion, scour, and further structural compromise. Urgent stabilization is paramount for public safety and infrastructure. The location of
the pier is central to Pacifica’s downtown and will have significant effects on residents, businesses, and visitors.

Construction efforts are subject to approvals of multiple permit agencies, environmental compliance, and will
need to be done in coordination with multiple utility
providers. Financially the pier is a very large asset in a relatively small city - which we anticipate may strain the repair budget.

In partnership efforts, we recognize project funding
may be progressive and subject to FEMA and CalOES
validation of cost. We have performed work on multiple
FEMA and CalOES projects and understand the need to
produce iterative estimates, justify means and methods, separate estimates and billings between repairs of
specific items vs project improvements, etc. to assist the City in qualifying for maximum funding where applicable.

We look forward to the opportunity to be part of the
City’s solution to urgently stabilize Beach Boulevard
and Pacifica’s pier. We have assembled a very strong
and experienced team that can quickly navigate design
build construction, promptly evaluate temporary vs
permanent stabilization options with the City, work
within an established budget, assist with permitting and cost validation, and successfully execute challenging
construction projects to mitigate further risk to the City of Pacifica.
9 9
SECTION 03 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT CHALLENGES

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project PHASE 1 - BEACH BOULEVARD AND UTILITY

INVESTIGATION AND STABILIZATION

INVESTIGATIVE APPROACH
Our investigation approach will incorporate multiple
avenues starting with existing data, shifting to current site investigation, and moving into a future exploration of subsurface conditions.

Existing Data: We will review all available
documentation including existing drawings, previous
retrofit, and condition reports and photos.  We will
analyze the structures before visiting the site to estimate forces and moments due to pier span rotation and
translation and structural capacities to help understand what locations are of concern.

Site Observation: Our team will conduct a
comprehensive geotechnical study and geological
investigation to assess subsurface site conditions,
providing the baseline data needed to support emergency repairs for Phase 1 and Phase 2. We will work as a team to develop working concepts to mitigate movement
at Beach Boulevard and pier. The investigation will
include coastal and geotechnical basis-of-design reports alongside construction drawings (Phase 1) tailored to
stabilize the site for future work phases. The design effort leverages our team’s coastal expertise—evaluating wave
loading, erosion, and wave run-up—while offering crucial geotechnical design support for pile foundations, earth pressures and wall evaluations, and the stabilization of the failing abutment wall system. To ensure successful
implementation, we will also provide engineering support and special testing services throughout construction.

For structures, we will observe and have photos taken
of the entirety of the landside pier structure starting from the abutment through the first two bents.  We will observe areas with binoculars and direct the drone
operator to take up close photos.  From the drone footage we intend to use photogrammetry to compile a digital
model of the inshore structure and first supporting
pile Bent B. Key areas to review include the span for
bending damage, particularly at its pile cap connection, the severe pile bending damage including the pile
connection into the pile cap, and the engagement of the second span with its expansion joint support.  We will
confirm that key measurements are taken to understand
damage and clearances for future work and designs,
e.g., installation clearances.  While on site, we will review photos, line of site observations with binoculars, and
measured displacements and rotations and ensure that
areas of concern are documented adequately for future
repair engineering work including shoring design and
construction clearances.

Subsurface Conditions: Subsurface conditions
are paramount to understanding the site’s existing
challenges, evaluating construction means and methods,
as well as evaluating performance of our proposed
design. We will execute a targeted geotechnical field
investigation along Beach Boulevard near the abutment
approach. This exploration will evaluate subsurface soil conditions and identify suitable foundation strata for new stabilization elements and seawalls. The scope includes three borings drilled up to 75 feet deep using mudrotary methods, with soil samples collected at frequent vertical intervals for laboratory testing. Additionally, we plan to remove the AC & paving surrounding the pier
entrance, pothole for utilities, install two inclinometers, and establish utility monitoring points to monitor existing conditions and future settlement. During exploratory
excavation we’ll be monitoring for distressed areas,
identifying subsurface voids with intent to backfill with CDF as needed, inspecting the adjacent seawalls to the
inshore structure, inspecting for compromised utilities, and evaluating soil and retention systems for supporting anticipated construction loading.

STABILIZATION STRATEGY
We’d like to present two Beach Boulevard stabilization
strategies in this RFQ, Concept 1 and Concept 1A. Both
will stabilize Beach Boulevard, but they vary in cost,
risk, and the resultant useable footprint of the inshore structure. Concept 1 we anticipate to be the most cost
effective, lowest risk, and smallest footprint.

In the following sections we’d like to offer two distinct design variation options to Phase 1.
10 10
SECTION 03 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT CHALLENGES

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project PHASE 1 - TWO DESIGN CONCEPTS
CONCEPT 1: Installation of King Pile COMBI Wall along Beach Boulevard (See Concept Drawings, page 2 of 8)
In Concept 1, we are proposing a linear King Pile COMBI wall aligned between the existing seawall to the North and South of the inshore structure. This solution creates a continuous seawall along Beach Street. We anticipate the wall composition to incorporate approximately 10 EA 3’ diameter king piles with interconnecting sheets approximately 70’ in length. At the interface between the existing MSE seawall to the North and South a structural reinforced concrete closure connection will be constructed to seal and support the transitions. King pile and sheet piles would be sized to function in cantilever against soil loading, seismic, and surcharge loading independent of tie backs or other support that would further impact Beach Blvd. This approach will provide good protection for Beach Blvd, minimizes the stabilization footprint, and keeps stabilization pile driving further from the supporting abutment of the first pier span. This option offers little protection for the existing inshore structure from further degradation which could also affect the remaining pier should it continue to settle prior to Phase 2.

CONCEPT 1A: Installation of King Pile COMBI Wall West from Beach Boulevard (See Concept Drawings, page 3 of 8)
In Concept 1A, we are proposing a King Pile COMBI
wall that extends West off Beach Boulevard offset on the exterior of the existing inshore structure, then turns North South just before the tapered section of the existing inshore structure. This approach stabilizes Beach Blvd and the
majority of the existing inshore structure. We anticipate a similar composition of king pile and connecting sheets, as well as a reinforced structural concrete closure connection at the existing MSE seawall to the North and South side of the inshore structure. This approach is complicated by existing and new rip rap, previous retrofit improved soil and reinforced walls, tie back layout, existing sheet pile crossings, and utility crossings that will require mitigation for wall placement and additional provisions to retain soil after install. Pile driving in this approach occurs in closer proximity to the critical first pier span abutment, so we are recommending consideration of Phase 2 to shore the first span in advance of driving the COMBI wall under this option. 11 11
SECTION 03 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT CHALLENGES

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project PHASE 1 - BEACH BOULEVARD AND UTILITY

INVESTIGATION AND STABILIZATION

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING
Our project schedule outlines preconstruction steps
including design build concept development, 100%
drawing and calculation packages, permitting assistance, and long lead material acquisition.

Onsite work will commence with our site investigation
described above. Prior to ground disturbing work
including potholing and geotechnical borings, we’ll mark the site’s known utilities with assistance of Underground Service Alert and local municipality maps. We’ll mobilize equipment and materials to the available staging area
at 2212 Beach Boulevard. Traffic control measures will
be introduced and we’ll establish our 100’ pedestrian
exclusion zone. We intend to construct a barrier with a combination of K-rail and site fencing to provide both
pedestrian and vehicular protection. After removal of AC we’ll identify utilities that require re-route, cutting, and caping in concurrence with local municipalities. Other
utilities that are at risk of compromise will be shored prior to advancing to pile driving. Any structural voids uncovered during excavation efforts will be backfilled
with CDF. Permeation grouting needs will be evaluated
behind the seawall. On completion of subsurface
excavation, borings, and integration of inclinometers and utility monitoring points, we’ll backfill to subgrade level with rock and stabilize an area in preparation for crane mobilization. Inclinometers, utility monitoring points, and survey tracking points on the inshore structure will be tracked and reported regularly to the project team.

Our intent for the site investigation phase is to confirm and critique the current design approach concurrently
to rolling out the final design drawings and calculations.

This approach should expedite schedule and permitting
efforts to minimize duration between site investigation and Beach Boulevard stability improvements.

With the design finalized, permitting at final stage of issuance, and material imminent for arrival we’ll prepare to mobilize a large land-based crane and pile driving
hammer within the pedestrian exclusion zone on Beach
Blvd in preparation for installation of the King Pile Combi Wall. Improvements to the intended crane pad area will
be made to ensure adequate support is available for
worst case track loading conditions. Traffic control and community outreach will be an important aspect as we
mobilize what will be the most intrusive equipment to the site. Following the crane arrival, we’ll initiate deliveries of the King Pile and COMBI wall sheet pile. Excess material that will not fit within the pedestrian exclusion zone will be stockpiled in the available contractor staging area.

Prior to pile driving a detailed layout will be completed to ensure the wall and interlocks will be continuous, fully engaged, and aligned at ends for closure pours to the
existing MSE seawalls. We anticipate utilizing a shallow starter trench, survey controls, and templating to ensure pile positioning remains in tolerance. We’ll ensure
biological survey and monitoring are established, employ soft start techniques as required, and begin pile driving progressing linear along Beach Boulevard from one side
of the inshore structure to the other. Monitoring points on utilities, the inshore structure, and inclinometers will be closely observed during pile driving. After installation, pile refusal and cutoffs will be reported to the engineering team. Rip rap temporarily relocated for pile driving efforts will be restored. If Phase 2 is not intended to proceed the crane and pile driving hammer will be demobilized from
site.

Onsite activity will shift to the closure pours at the
North and South transitions from COMBI walls to MSE
walls. We anticipate this will require a shoring and
excavation for integration of a reinforced concrete
transition extending below waterside grade. To bolster
soil retention and Beach Boulevard stabilization we
may also incorporate soil permeation grouting in the
landside surrounding area of the COMBI wall to MSE wall transition. Concurrently retaining wall landside drainage provisions will be added as required by design analysis.

At this point in sequence, we anticipate Beach Boulevard stabilized. If Phase 2 does not immediately commence,
we will begin removal of remaining utility shoring in
preparation of backfill, compaction, and placement of AC and paving to re-establish the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Santa Rosa Ave. On completion, demobilization will
commence from Beach Boulevard and the contractor
staging area. We anticipate monitoring points,
12 12
SECTION 03 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT CHALLENGES

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project PHASE 1 - BEACH BOULEVARD AND UTILITY

INVESTIGATION AND STABILIZATION
inclinometers, and utility monitoring points will remain onsite through future phases of improvement.

PUBLIC SAFETY MEASURES
Public safety is an important aspect of any construction project, but the heavy civil, marine, and structural aspects of this project with residences immediately across the
street make this project unique. There are many controls that need to be established to execute a safe project in these conditions.

Pre-Construction Community Outreach – The
importance of stabilization of Beach Boulevard and
its infrastructure needs to be clearly communicated
to the community for alignment of a common goal.

With reasonable notice of upcoming impacts from
traffic control, parking, noise, etc. we anticipate better community support as well as improved awareness for
safety concerns.

Establishment of the 100’ Exclusion Zone –
A hard division needs to be made between the public
and a heavy civil and marine construction project.

The construction methods utilized on this project
are uncommon to typical community residences. We
anticipate the nature of work will be interesting enough to draw a crowd at times that needs to be monitored
and controlled. For others, complacency with changing
conditions could put them at risk. Consideration for
waterside protection measures of beach pedestrians,
surfers, and swimmers also needs to be addressed with
adequate signage and barriers when appropriate. Within
this exclusion zone we’ll need to control noise, dust, UV light from welding, and many other variables.

Pre-Construction Surveys – For protection of the
City, Contractor, and Residents a preconstruction survey of existing conditions prior to start of construction is necessary. Construction equipment and pile driving
activities will induce vibrations to the surrounding area.

Crack monitoring and seismic monitoring techniques will be employed to quantify impacts.

Noise and Working Hour Restriction – We
anticipate working hours will be limited given the
expected noise generation and proximity of residents
to the site. Work planning efforts will also need to
coordinate with tides. Ambient sound monitoring shall
be utilized to ensure public safety. If limits exceed
thresholds, acoustic barriers will be employed.

Weather, Swells, and Tide Monitoring – Until
stabilization is complete weather, tide, and swell forecasts present a substantial threat to public and crews crew
safety in the worksite and surrounding areas. These
aspects must be closely monitored by the construction
team and hazards communicated clearly to stakeholders
providing notice to the public when reasonable.

UTILITY COORDINATION
Utility coordination will start in the early phases of our investigation approach. Studies of As-Built drawings
from local municipalities should identify approximate
location and function of major elements. We’ll utilize
Underground Service Alert to mark the site and compare
results to record drawings. Private subsurface utilities locators will be utilized for critical infrastructure that is unclear. Potholing through means of mechanical, hand,
and vacuum excavation methods will be utilized to safely expose utilities. Utilities will by systematically identified, tracked on RFI’s and recorded As Built Drawings. For
inconsistencies, clarifications, or re-route propositions we’ll alert the City and reach out local utility suppliers and municipalities to evaluate solutions that meet the
project’s schedule goals.
13 13
SECTION 03 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT CHALLENGES

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project PHASE 1 - BEACH BOULEVARD AND UTILITY

INVESTIGATION AND STABILIZATION

ENVIRONMENTAL AND PERMITTING

CONSIDERATIONS
Environmental Considerations: Our experience
driving piling along the Pacific coast – particularly within tidal zones suggests marine mammal monitoring and a
nesting bird survey may be required for our proposed
scope. We have experienced consultants available to
assist with this process as required during permit review.

We understand there is no anticipated contamination at
the site. We will plan to develop a detailed site-specific storm water prevention plan incorporating deployment
of typical BMPs to prevent runoff, sediment transfer, or other construction induced transmission from ground
disturbing activities.

Noise monitoring and acoustic barriers shall be
implemented as needed to protect wildlife.

Permitting Considerations: We understand the City
will be the CEQA lead and will assist with all required permits. We have deep experience navigating the CEQA
process and will participate in this pursuit. Given the emergency nature of this project, we anticipate permitting may be expedited through exemptions but will likely
involve RWQB, CCC, CDFW, and USACE at some point
in the construction process. Early communication with
permit agencies is critical to maintaining an emergency response schedule.

APPROACH TO MAINTAINING SCHEDULE
The key to maintaining schedule on an emergency
project of this nature will be developing an accurate and reasonable CPM baseline schedule with concurrence
from all stakeholders, regularly monitoring progress
through updates, proactively managing constraints
and risk, and setting team milestones to facilitate
accountability. Concurrent process management
between design, permitting, and long lead material
acquisition must be seamless to maximize efficiency. In a fast-moving emergency project, transparency of cost,
schedule, and risk amongst the construction team and
client is essential. Presenting information early and often is key to this approach to avoid bottlenecks.

Safety can never be compromised, and a realistic project schedule must assume weather impact days for storm,
swell, or excessive tides until a reasonable level of
stabilization can be attained.
14 14
SECTION 03 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT CHALLENGES

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project PHASE 2 - PIER FIRST SPAN INVESTIGATION AND

STABILIZATION

INVESTIGATION APPROACH
The investigation approach to Phase 2 will be completed during Phase 1 in effort to fully comprehend the needed stabilization effort. We also anticipate Phase 2 may
become integral to Phase 1 pending the selected
approach of stabilizing Beach Boulevard.

STABILIZATION STRATEGY
Currently the landside abutment of the first pier span is settling and rotating. As a result, Bent B has sustained structural damage to the supporting piles, cap, closure pour and handrails. A failure of this pier span could be detrimental to the stability of the remaining pier bents.

Our stabilization strategy to Phase 2 is to mitigate further settlement by installing a temporary pile supported bent immediately West of the inshore structure. The support
will be constructed from 2 EA 36” steel pipe piles, two wide flange beam cross members, and a jack and shoring
system to ensure the temporary support is adequately
loaded to relieve the structure. Further investigation of Bent B is required to determine; (1) If a sleeve repair to the compression spalling of the existing piles at Bent B is required for the stabilization phase, (2) If a cracking or deflection at the keyed joint over Bent B require the addition of a steel saddle support strap transfer load from the first span over Bent B, (3) If tensioned rods to increase the negative bending strength are required atop the first span.

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING
Our project schedule outlines preconstruction steps
including design build concept development, 100%
drawing and calculation packages, permitting assistance, and long lead material acquisition.

Assuming this work occurs during or immediately
after construction of Phase 1, the crane and pile driving hammer needed for this scope will already be onsite. All environmental provisions, utility monitoring, and public safety controls will already be in place.

To initiate work, we’ll survey and layout our new
temporary support location. Pile driving will commence
to attain the required tip elevation. Piles will be cut off as needed and fabrication will proceed to install
the supporting beams beneath the span. With the
supporting beams established we’ll install the 4 EA
hydraulic jacking elements and assume approximately
25% of the calculated dead load. With the system initially shored further investigation and strengthening work
may be required per the stabilization strategy including Bent B pile repair sleeves, a Bent B saddle support, or tensioned rods to facilitate negative moment transfer.

With the situation evaluated and required improvements
constructed we’ll proceed with increasing jacking
loads to 75% of estimated dead load. On completion,
shim brackets will be installed and the hydraulic jacks removed.

At this point in the work sequence, we anticipate the
Pier’s first span will be safely stabilized. Assuming this is the last activity on the project in the final construction sequence, demobilization efforts will ensure in kind to those described in Phase 1.

Public Safety Measures:

See Phase 1 Public Safety Measures.

Utility Coordination:

See Phase 1 Utility Coordination.

Environmental and Permitting Considerations:

See Phase 1 Environmental Permitting Considerations.

Approach to Maintaining Schedule:

See Phase 1 Approach to Maintaining Schedule.

15 15
SECTION 03 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT CHALLENGES

SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL

5.b
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City A California Corporation All rights reserved Original border size 525 x 812 mm. 2 No. Revision Date By Approved Date Revision Approved of By Sheet No. Project No. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
Copyright c by Liftech Consultants Inc. a
bcdefgh
344 - 20th STREET SUITE 360, Oakland, CA 94612, 510 832-5606 Checked Checked 2026 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94612 PH: (510) 832-5606 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94612, (510) 832-5606 SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL 5.b
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City A California Corporation All rights reserved Original border size 525 x 812 mm. 2 No. Revision Date By Approved Date Revision Approved of By Sheet No. Project No. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
Copyright c by Liftech Consultants Inc. a
bcdefgh
344 - 20th STREET SUITE 360, Oakland, CA 94612, 510 832-5606 Checked Checked Oakland, Ca 94612 Ph: (510) 832-5606 2025 2024
SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL 5.b
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City A California Corporation All rights reserved Original border size 525 x 812 mm. 2 No. Revision Date By Approved Date Revision Approved of By Sheet No. Project No. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
Copyright c by Liftech Consultants Inc. a
bcdefgh
344 - 20th STREET SUITE 360, Oakland, CA 94612, 510 832-5606 Checked Checked Oakland, Ca 94612 Ph: (510) 832-5606 2025 2024
SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL 5.b
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City A California Corporation All rights reserved Original border size 525 x 812 mm. 2 No. Revision Date By Approved Date Revision Approved of By Sheet No. Project No. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
Copyright c by Liftech Consultants Inc. a
bcdefgh
344 - 20th STREET SUITE 360, Oakland, CA 94612, 510 832-5606 Checked Checked Oakland, Ca 94612 Ph: (510) 832-5606 2025 2024
SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL 5.b
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City A California Corporation All rights reserved Original border size 525 x 812 mm. 2 No. Revision Date By Approved Date Revision Approved of By Sheet No. Project No. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
Copyright c by Liftech Consultants Inc. a
bcdefgh
344 - 20th STREET SUITE 360, Oakland, CA 94612, 510 832-5606 Checked Checked Oakland, Ca 94612 Ph: (510) 832-5606 2025 2024
SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL 5.b
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City A California Corporation All rights reserved Original border size 525 x 812 mm. 2 No. Revision Date By Approved Date Revision Approved of By Sheet No. Project No. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
Copyright c by Liftech Consultants Inc. a
bcdefgh
344 - 20th STREET SUITE 360, Oakland, CA 94612, 510 832-5606 Checked Checked Oakland, Ca 94612 Ph: (510) 832-5606 2025 2024
SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL 5.b
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City A California Corporation All rights reserved Original border size 525 x 812 mm. 2 No. Revision Date By Approved Date Revision Approved of By Sheet No. Project No. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
Copyright c by Liftech Consultants Inc. a
bcdefgh
344 - 20th STREET SUITE 360, Oakland, CA 94612, 510 832-5606 Checked Checked Oakland, Ca 94612 Ph: (510) 832-5606 2025 2024
SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL 5.b
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City A California Corporation All rights reserved Original border size 525 x 812 mm. 2 No. Revision Date By Approved Date Revision Approved of By Sheet No. Project No. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
Copyright c by Liftech Consultants Inc. a
bcdefgh
344 - 20th STREET SUITE 360, Oakland, CA 94612, 510 832-5606 Checked Checked Oakland, Ca 94612 Ph: (510) 832-5606 2025 2024
SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL 5.b
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City SCHEDULE ONE- CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL 5.b
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Resolution- Ratify Approve Pier Stabilization Agmt Power Eng FINAL [Revision 1] (6277 : Ratify - Approve City Pacifica Pier, Beach Boulevard, and Utility Stablization Project 17 SECTION 04 PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE
ID Task
Mode
Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Proposal Schedule: Investigation and Stabilization of Pacifica Pier 117 days Wed 7/29/26 Fri 1/15/27 2 Proposal Due Date 0 days Wed 7/29/26 Wed 7/29/26 3 Notice of Intent to Award 5 days Wed 7/29/26 Tue 8/4/26 2 4 NTP for Investigation 10 days Wed 8/5/26 Tue 8/18/26 3 5 Site Investigation and Site Security 10 days Wed 8/19/26 Tue 9/1/26 6 Mobilize and Secure Project Site 5 days Wed 8/19/26 Tue 8/25/26 4 7 Utility Investigation and Pier Utility Capping 5 days Wed 8/26/26 Tue 9/1/26 6 8 Geotechnical Investigation (borings and pot-hole investigation) 5 days Wed 8/26/26 Tue 9/1/26 6 9 Aerial Photogrammetric Survey 2 days Wed 8/26/26 Thu 8/27/26 6 10 Phase 1 Design 30 days Wed 8/19/26 Wed 9/30/26
11 Phase 1 Concept Design Submission 5 days Wed 8/19/26 Tue 8/25/26 4 12 Phase 1 Concept Review 3 days Wed 8/26/26 Fri 8/28/26 11 13 Phase 1: 100% Design Submission 10 days Wed 9/2/26 Wed 9/16/26 7,8,9,12 14 Design Review & Approval 10 days Thu 9/17/26 Wed 9/30/26 13 15 Regulatory Review & Approval 10 days Thu 9/17/26 Wed 9/30/26 13 16 Phase 1 Construction 41 days Thu 10/1/26 Mon 11/30/26 17 Demolish Existing AC and Concrete near Pier 3 days Thu 10/1/26 Mon 10/5/26 15,14 18 Install & Grade Rock Base in Construction Area 2 days Tue 10/6/26 Wed 10/7/26 17 19 Build First Crane Pad and Mobilize Crane 3 days Thu 10/8/26 Mon 10/12/26 18 20 Backfill Voids & Permeation Grout near MSE Wall 2 days Tue 10/13/26 Wed 10/14/26 19 21 Augment Existing Rock Revetment if required 4 days Thu 10/15/26 Tue 10/20/26 20 22 Furnish & Install O-Pile or Combi-Wall 12 days Wed 10/21/26 Thu 11/5/26 21 23 Closer Pour - Connection of O-Pile Wall to Existing MSE Wall 6 days Fri 11/6/26 Fri 11/13/26 22 24 Regrade Site and Move Crane Pad Closer to Pier 6 days Mon 11/16/26 Mon 11/23/26 23 25 Install Winter SWPPP Measures & Secure Site 3 days Tue 11/24/26 Mon 11/30/26 24 26 Phase 1 Complete 0 days Mon 11/30/26 Mon 11/30/26 25 27 Phase 2 Design 45 days Wed 9/2/26 Wed 11/4/26
28 Phase 2 Concept Design Submission 10 days Wed 9/2/26 Wed 9/16/26 4,7,8,9 29 Phase 2: 100% Design Submission 15 days Thu 9/17/26 Wed 10/7/26 28 30 Design Review & Approval 10 days Thu 10/8/26 Wed 10/21/26 29 31 Regulatory Review & Approval 10 days Thu 10/22/26 Wed 11/4/26 30 32 Phase 2 Construction 47 days Thu 11/5/26 Fri 1/15/27 33 Furnish & Install Two 36" Shoring Piles 10 days Thu 11/5/26 Wed 11/18/26 31 34 Furnish & Install Shoring Beam & Jacking System 11 days Thu 11/19/26 Mon 12/7/26 33 35 Jack Shoring to 25% of Dead Load 1 day Tue 12/8/26 Tue 12/8/26 34 36 Install Scaffolding System at Pier 1 5 days Wed 12/9/26 Tue 12/15/26 35 37 Install Reinforced Pile Sleeves around Piles at Bent 1 10 days Wed 12/16/26 Thu 12/31/26 36 38 Install Bent 1 Bracing System 10 days Wed 12/23/26 Fri 1/8/27 37SS+5 days 39 Jack Shoring to 75% of Dead Load, Lock Off and Shim 1 day Mon 1/11/27 Mon 1/11/27 38 40 Remove Scaffolding at Bent 1 4 days Tue 1/12/27 Fri 1/15/27 39 41 Remove Jacking System 1 day Tue 1/12/27 Tue 1/12/27 39 42 Phase 2 Complete 0 days Fri 1/15/27 Fri 1/15/27 41,40,37 43 Initial Stabilization Project Complete 0 days Fri 1/15/27 Fri 1/15/27 26,42 7/29 Proposal Due Date
Site Investigation and Site Security
Phase 1 Design
Phase 1 Construction
Phase 1 Complete 11/30
Phase 2 Design
Phase 2 Construction
Phase 2 Complete 1/15
Initial Stabilization Project Complete 1/15
7/12 7/19 7/26 8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 9/6 9/13 9/20 9/27 10/4 10/11 10/18 10/25 11/1 11/8 11/15 11/22 11/29 12/6 12/13 12/20 12/27 1/3 1/10 1/17 1/24 August September October November December January
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Critical
Critical Split
Progress
Manual Progress