Agenda packet, first session — Palmdale City Council, March 16, 2022 (part 1 of 3)

The Council Chamber is open for in-person public comment and seating.

Councilmembers may choose to participate via conference call.

How to observe the meeting virtually:

1. Spectrum local access Channel 27

2. Online live webcast at www.cityofpalmdale.org.

How to Submit Public Comments:

VERBAL PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THE MEETING – ZOOM Number: US: +1 346 248 7799 Webinar ID: 891 5623 4087 Passcode: 841770
Webinar attendee link https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89156234087? pwd=NmhmVEZyazVTUTFZazFZcGt4ZERndz09.

Verbal comments must be limited to three (3) minutes. Public comments submitted will become part of the official meeting record.

The safety and well-being of employees and the public remains the City's top priority. The City of Palmdale appreciates your patience and understanding during these challenging times.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY/PALMDALE AIRPORT AUTHORITY

PALMDALE CIVIC AUTHORITY/ PALMDALE FINANCING AUTHORITY

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
38300 SIERRA HIGHWAY

SUITE B
PALMDALE, CA 93550
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 2022
7:00 PM
www.cityofpalmdale.org

WELCOME
City Council
Wednesday, March 16, 2022

The City Council is making every effort to follow the spirit and intent of the Brown Act and other applicable laws regulating the conduct of public meetings in order to maximize transparency and public access.

In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, if you require a disability- related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (661) 267-5151 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

If you require oral Spanish translation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (661) 267- 5151 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

Your courtesy is requested to help our meetings run smoothly. If you’ll be kind enough to follow these simple rules, we can make the best possible use of your time and ours:

Please refrain from public displays or outbursts, such as unsolicited applause, comments, cheering, foul language or obscenities.

Any disruptive activities that substantially interfere with the ability of the City Council to carry out its meeting will not be permitted and offenders will be asked to leave the meeting.

Please turn off/mute your cell phones and mobile devices.

7:00 P.M.

1. MAYOR TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE IN HONOR OF OUR TROOPS

3. ROLL CALL

MAYOR / CHAIR HOFBAUER, MAYOR PRO TEM / VICE CHAIR / CHAIR PRO TEM LOA,

COUNCILMEMBERS / DIRECTORS / MEMBERS / COMMISSIONERS CARRILLO,

BISHOP, BETTENCOURT

COMMISSIONERS FRAGA-SAENZ, DENNY

4. WAIVER OF FULL READING OF RESOLUTION(S) and ORDINANCE(S) Staff Recommendation: Move to waive full reading of the Resolution (s) and/or Ordinance(s) to be considered and voted on at this meeting. (Voice Vote - Requires a majority to waive.)

City Council
Wednesday, March 16, 2022

5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Now is the time for public participation for any person wishing to speak to the City Council on matters listed or not listed on the agenda, within the jurisdiction of the City Council. If you are attending the meeting by phone, please press *9 to "raise your hand." If attending by personal computer, please click the "raise your hand" button. Press *6 to un-mute yourself, state your name and begin speaking. PLEASE NOTE: A three-minute limit is imposed on each speaker.

6. WORKSHOP PRESENTATION(S)

6.1 Illegal Dumping Action Plan Updates. (Staff Reference: Director of Public Works Heffernan - Presented by Deputy Director of Public Works Glidden)

SR - Illegal Dumping Action Plan Updates.docx

Illegal Dumping Action Plan Update.pdf

7. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one motion unless an item(s) is pulled by Council, in which case the item(s) will be removed from the Calendar and will be considered separately following this portion of the Agenda.

7.1 Receive the Summary of the Annual Housing Element Progress Report. (Staff Reference: Director of Economic and Community Development Garibay)

CC SR 03-16-22.docx

Attachment 1.pdf

7.2 Approve Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc for professional services on PN 835, Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan, in the amount of $597,339. (Staff Reference: Director of Public Works Heffernan - Presented by Deputy Director of Public Works Glidden)

PN 835 - Award SR.docx

A-7849 - Draft.pdf

7.3 Adopt Resolution No. CC 2022-020, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palmdale authorizing the application for grant funds from the Recreational Trails Program for the Barrel Springs Trail Improvement Project. (Staff Reference:

Director of Public Works Heffernan - Presented by Deputy Director of Public Works Glidden)

Staff Report Resolution 2022-020.docx

Resolution 2022-020.doc

7.4 Adopt Resolution No. CC 2022-025, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palmdale authorizing California Choice Energy Authority (CalChoice) to enter into a long-term renewable energy agreement with Powerex Corporation on behalf of City Council
Wednesday, March 16, 2022
Energy for Palmdale’s Independent Choice (EPIC). (Staff Reference: Finance Manager: Kang, Presented by: Energy Resource Manager Salt)

01. 20220316_Palmdale Staff Report Final_EPIC CCA Powerex Resolution_TS.docx

02. 220316 CCEA PCC1 Confirm (Bal 22-32) - Palmdale - PWX Executed_Redacted.pdf

03. 20220316_Palmdale Resolution Final_EPIC CCA Powerex_TS.doc

7.5 Adopt Resolution No. CC 2022-030, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palmdale Authorizing Remote Teleconference Meeting of the City Council and All City Subordinate Bodies for the Period of March 24, 2022 - April 23, 2022. (Staff Reference: City Attorney Beck)

3_16_2022_Staff_Report_-
_Resolution_of_the_City_Council_Authorizing_Remote_Teleconference_Meetings__RESOLUTION_NO._CC_2022- 030.docx

3_16_2022
Resolution No. CC 2022-030 Brown Act Teleconference AB 361.doc

8. APPOINTMENTS

8.1 Approve District 4 Alternate Member nomination for appointment to the Measure AV Oversight Committee. (Staff Reference: City Clerk Smith)

3_16_22_MAV_Alt_Member_Appointment.docx

Ordinance No. 1561.pdf

MAV_Bylaws.docx

8.2 Approve nominations for appointment of three Committee Members and one Alternate Committee Member to the Human Rights Advisory Committee. (Staff Reference: City Clerk Smith)

3_16_2022_Human_Rights_Advisory_Committee_Appointment_SR.docx

1550.pdf

1561.pdf

HRAC Bylaws.docx

9. JOINT NEW BUSINESS CC/SA/HA/IDA/PAA/PCA/PFA

9.1 Review and approve the FY 2022 mid-year budget adjustment, and adopt Resolution No. CC 2022-032, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palmdale amending the City’s Classification and Pay Plan for Parks and Recreation Unbenefited Positions.(Staff Reference: Finance Manager Kang)

1. FY 2022 SR Mid-Year Budget.docx

2. FY 2022 Mid-Year Budget 3.09.22.pdf

3. Resolution CC 2022.032 P & R Unbenefited.doc

4. Exhibit 1 Proposed Class and Pay Plan Recreation.doc

5. Exhibit 2 Proposed Salary Schedule Recreation.pdf

City Council
Wednesday, March 16, 2022

10. PUBLIC HEARING

10.1 Public Hearing and Review of Proposed Ordinance No. 1579 for adoption. (Staff Reference: City Manager - City Clerk Division)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALMDALE

ADOPTING A MAP DESCRIBING VOTING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND AMENDING CHAPTER 4.10 OF TITLE 4 OF THE PALMDALE MUNICIPAL CODE

Staff Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance No. 1579

3.16.2022.Ordinance 1579 Staff Report.docx

[Proposed] Ordinance No. 1579 Combined [3.16].pdf

10.2 Public hearing to review and consider several proposed five (5) district draft maps provided by Compass Demographics, Inc. and discuss the potential move to five (5) council districts and rotating mayor.

3.16.2022_Public_Hearing_to_Review_and_Consider_Transitioning_To_Five_Council_Districts_And__A_Rotating_Mayor.docx

option1.pdf

option2.pdf

option3.pdf

option4.pdf

option5.pdf

report__options.pdf

11. ADJOURN
City Council
Wednesday, March 16, 2022
City Council Staff Report
DATE: MARCH 16, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
DISTRICT: ALL
SUBJECT: ILLEGAL DUMPING ACTION PLAN UPDATES
ISSUE
Illegal Dumping Action Plan Updates.

RECOMMENDATION
The intent of this workshop is to provide the Council with updated information on the City’s Illegal Dumping Action Plan.

BACKGROUND
On June 23, 2021, staff presented an Illegal Dumping Action Plan to the public to outline how the City is currently addressing illegal dumping and presented several other proposed methods to enhance its program. Shortly after, staff conducted a meeting with several key stakeholders and also accepted and participated in a Town Hall meeting on the topic. Some aspects of the meeting were incorporated into the Plan. Shortly after, the City updated the Plan, prioritizing several action items to ensure greater success of the Plan. The purpose of this presentation is to provide updates on items that were previously prioritized and the City’s overall efforts to address illegal dumping.

DISCUSSION
No decisions are intended to be made during the workshop. Staff from Public Works and Neighborhood Services will be present to outline the information and to answer questions.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

STRATEGIC PLAN
Goal I: Maintain effective public safety and protection for life, property and the environment.

C. Use a variety of methods to communicate timely, useful, and trusted information about city programs, services and policies.

Report to Mayor and City Council
Re: Illegal Dumping Action Plan Updates
Date of Meeting: March 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

Goal III: Invest in infrastructure to improve community livability.

B. Implement and administer environmentally sustainable programs.

Prepared by: Chuck Heffernan, P.E., Director of Public Works Certified as to availability of Funds: Keith Kang, Finance Manager Approved by: Ronda Perez, Interim City Manager
Approved as to form: Christopher Beck, City Attorney

ATTACHMENTS
PowerPoint – Illegal Dumping Action Plan Updates
Illegal
Dumping
Action Plan
Update
March 16, 2022
What is Illegal
Dumping?
Illegal dumping is any
unauthorized disposal of waste
on any public or private
property. Usually to avoid
collection and disposal fees or
because the illegal dumper
believes proper disposal is just
“too much trouble.”

How Does it Affect
Our Community?
Is a community eyesore
Decreases neighborhood property values
Costs taxpayers millions of dollars in clean-up costs
Negatively impacts plants and wildlife
Poses safety hazards to people, especially children
Provides a breeding ground for disease-carrying rodents, insects, and other vermin Disrupts natural land and water processes and ruins wildlife habitat Pollutes surface and groundwater
There are three main reasons:

Money, quality of life, and the environment.

Illegal dumping:

Public Right-of-Way
Public Works
Private Property
Code Enforcement
Who Handles Illegal
Dumping?
PW Maintenance Efforts
Incidents are the work orders that
have been created, it includes
requests made by the public as well
as the ones created by the crews
who are out driving around. When
Maintenance staff notices dumping
in an area they will pick it up and
create a work order.

Locations - Number of different
locations attached to the work
orders (some locations are reported
multiple times).

Tonnage - Collected from WM
reports.

Current year to date total of incidents, 567
compared to last year 655 (during the same time
period July through January). If trend continues,
the number of reports will decrease by over 150.

Code Enforcement Efforts
The total number of "cases"
results from proactive
enforcement action or a
community complaint. Citations are issued due to
non-compliance of a
property owner or directly to
the person responsible for
the dumping.

Options Now Available
HHW & E-Waste
Events
Landfill Vouchers*
Bulky Item
Collections*
Trash -One
Ton Voucher
Trash -One
Ton Voucher
Turf/Soil -Two
Ton Voucher
*per year (July - June) *
Illegal Dumping
Action Plan
Update
Partnerships
with Private
Organizations
Code Changes &
Enforcement
Policies
Multifamily
Complex
Outreach &
Education
Civic Center
Clean-Up
Surveillance
Cameras
Items for Future
Implementation
Maintenance
Yard Roll-Off
Illegal Hauler
Ordinance
Items
Completed
Items for Discussion
Partnerships with Private
Organizations
Quarterly meetings with
organizations.

A calendar will be made
available online to reserve and
coordinate clean-up events.

A set number of roll off bins specifically
for these clean up events are being
negotiated in amendment to the Solid
Waste Collections Franchise Agreement.

Civic Center Clean-Up
A Request for Bid was posted on
February 22, 2022 and closed on
March 3, 2022; there is a total of
XX responses received and
currently under review.

The targeted area for services is
from the 14 Freeway to 15th
Street East, between Avenue Q
and Avenue S.

The strategy includes a job-skill-
development component.

Maintenance Yard Roll-Off
City is finalizing new
agreement with the
Mattress Recycling
Council to become a
public drop off site.

Tentative operational
hours for public drop off
of mattresses are
Wednesdays from 8am to
3pm and on the fourth
Saturday of every month
from 9am to 12pm.

Code Enforcement will continue to enforce the Municipal Code.

Tow (seize) a vehicle for dumping; PMC 9.47.030
Misdemeanor cite for illegal dumping (with aggravating
circumstances)
Fines: 1st offense is $2,500, 2nd offense is $5,000, and 3rd offense is $10,000
Suspend a business license for illegal dumping; PMC 5.04.310 Misdemeanors cite for illegal hauler operating without a business license which would be two misdemeanors - one for dumping and one for operating a business without a business license.

Staff is currently working on the City's Construction and Demolition Debris (C&D) Ordinance.

Staff is proposing to include language in the current business license application that references AB 246, which allows the Contractors State License Board to "deny the licensure of, or cite, temporarily suspend, or permanently revoke any license or registration" of a contractor found guilty of illegaly dumping.

1. 2.

3. 4.

Code
Changes &
Enforcement
Policies
Surveillance Cameras
Staff has obtained cameras and have
set them up at a hot spot area as a pilot
program.

If the program is effective, cameras will
be installed at various hot spot
locations.

Updates will be provided as program
continues.

Multifamily Complex Outreach &
Education
The City received a grant from the Mattress
Recycling Council to develop behavior change
elements in multifamily housing units.

It paid for the City's Lightning Loader wrap to
promote education on how to properly dispose
of items.

The pilot program is in progress and should be
completed by Q2 of 2022.

Items for Future
Implementation
RV Dump Site
Geo-Fencing
Reward for Reporting
Illegal Dumpers
Regional Behavior
Change Strategy
Items
Completed
Require All New High-Density Residential,
Multifamily, and Commercial Construction
Projects to Provide a Waste and Recycling
Plan
Add Waste and Recycling Service
Verification as part of the Rental
Unit Inspection Program
Adopt an Illegal Hauler Ordinance
Partnering with LA County on
an Expanded Schedule of
Collection Events
Mandatory Commercial Recycling and
Mandatory Organics Recycling Non-Compliance
Fee
Saturday,
March 26th
Saturday,
April 23rd
Saturday,
May 28th
Saturday,
June 25th
42nd St E and
Ave Q
70th St E and
Ave S
70th St E and
Ave R
Division and
Ave O
Upcoming EventsSeason of Service
This Season of Service, we will be doing
monthly desert clean-ups.

Used Oil & Filter
Collection/Exchange
Event
Paint Recycling &
Reuse Event
Paper Shredding
Event
LA County
Partnership
To Contact
City Staff:

Environmental Resources
(661)267-5300
[email protected]
City Council Staff Report
DATE: MARCH 16, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

PLANNING DIVISION
DISTRICT: ALL
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRESS
REPORT
ISSUE
Should the City Council receive the summary of the Annual Housing Element Progress Report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Receive the summary of the Annual Housing Element Progress Report; and,

2. Direct staff to file the report with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

BACKGROUND
Government Code Section 65400 requires that all California cities provide an Annual Housing Element Progress Report to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

The intent of the statute is to describe the City’s progress in meeting its share of the Regional Housing Needs Assessm ent (RHNA). Also, by f iling this report with OPR and HCD the City may be eligible for future housing grants.

DISCUSSION
A total of 5,452 units have been allocated to the City of Palmdale during the planning period October 2014 - October 2021 under its 5th cycle RHNA (Note: 6 th cycle RHNA allocations have been finalized but are not considered for this reporting period).

Report to Mayor and City Council
Re: Summary of Annual Housing Element Progress Report
Date March 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

These units are distributed by affordability level and the Housing Element of the General Plan must identify how the City plans to accommodate them. The City is required to designate land for housing to ensure that there is enough residentially designated land to meet its RHNA allocation, however, it is not required to ensure units are built. The City is required to report on the progress of housing development in the form of the Annual Housing Element Progress Report.

For calendar year 2021, 276 housing units were issued a Certificate of Occupancy.

Table 1: 5th Cycle RHNA Allocation with Annual Issued Certificates of Occupancy Income
Level
RHNA
Allocation
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Total remaining
Very Low 1,395 91 16 107 1,288
Low 827 70 86 741
Moderate 898 86 62 149 233 260 790 108
Above
Moderate
2,332 29 42 95 166 2,166
Total 5,452 29 42 95 247 62 149 233 276 1,149 4,303
In summary, 2021 saw more completed units than in prior years within this reporting cycle.

FISCAL IMPACT
The annual Housing Element report is not anticipated to have any fiscal impact. However, the data within the report can be used to continue to streamline internal processes to facilitate increased productivity and accelerate housing development. Although no new revenue is anticipated, the construction of housing units of varied types ultimately has a positive net fiscal impact.

STRATEGIC PLAN
Goal III: Invest in infrastructure to improve community livability.

E. Transform housing inventory to meet the changing lifestyle and market demands.

Prepared by: Brenda Magaña, Senior Planner
Certified as to availability of Funds: Keith Kang, Finance Manager Approved by: Ronda Perez, Interim City Manager
Approved as to form: Christopher Beck, City Attorney

ATTACHMENTS

1. Annual Housing Element Report Summary
Jurisidiction Name
Reporting Calendar Year
First Name
Last Name
Title
Email
Phone
Street Address
City
Zipcode
v 1_13_2022
Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used when the workbook is new and empty. You will be prompted to pick an old workbook to import from. Project and program data will be copied exactly how it was entered in last year's form and must be updated. If a project is no longer has any reportable activity, you may delete the project by selecting a cell in the row and typing ctrl + d.
38250 Sierra Highway
Palmdale
93550
Please Start Here
General Information
2021
Palmdale
Contact Information
Brenda
Magana
Senior Planner
[email protected]
6612675293
Mailing Address
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Palmdale ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 10/15/2013 - 10/15/2021
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Application
Status Notes
2 34 6 7 8 9 11 12
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted+
(see
instructions)
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low-
Income
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Total PROPOSED
Units by Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by project
Total

DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Was APPLICATION

SUBMITTED
Pursuant to GC
65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Was a Density
Bonus requested
for this housing
development?
Was a Density
Bonus approved
for this housing
development?
Please indicate
the status of the
application.

Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 149 0 15 0 15 127 0 306 228 0 3051-044-054 5615 Cisero Palm
Drive Z20-220 ADU R 05/26/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3050-002-004 5735 East Avenue
T-5 Z20-564 SFD O 07/28/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3024-047-054 6871 Beale Road
Drive Z21-002 ADU R 01/05/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3008-017-007 38473 Sumac
Avenue Z21-003 ADU O 01/19/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3204-043-008 6332 Govanni Way Z21-006 ADU R 02/16/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3021-008-007 339 E Avenue Q-1 Z21-013 ADU R 01/13/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3003-068-018 38906 S ilica Drive Z21-034 ADU R 02/03/ 2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3019-038-033 2002 Moonflower
Court Z21-092 ADU R 02/25/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3053-038-443 36877 Santolina
Drive Z21-105 ADU R 03/08/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3006-017-012 268 E Avenue P-4 Z21-110 ADU R 07/22/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3001-047-012 40327 Nido Court Z21-135 ADU R 06/02/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3003-053-041 3106 Paxton
Avenue Z21-130 ADU R 06/03/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3003-005-013 39502 Armfield
Avenue Z21-172 ADU R 04/07/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3050-005-009 5910 E Avenue T Z21-173 SFD O 04/27/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3004-018-030 38232 Meadow
Lane Z21-184 ADU R 07/19/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3024-031-037 37520 Calle
Mazatlan Z21-203 ADU R 08/30/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3023-042-017 4305 Lexington
Court Z21-233 ADU R 05/26/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3008-003-010 38644 Second
Street East Z21-237 ADU R 08/04/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3020-033-008 37334 37th Street
East Z21-250 ADU R 07/10/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3001-115-020 40223 Springpark
Lane Z21-259 ADU R 08/26/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3020-010-071 3301 East Avenue
S Z21-282 ADU R 06/02/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3008-023-012 132 East Avenue Q-
7 Z21-294 ADU R 07/10/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3014-020-015 38351 Rose Marie
Street Z21-356 ADU R 11/15/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3015-019-011 1503 East Avenue
Q-6 Z21-418 ADU R 08/26/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3003-042-010 2153 Twincreek
Avenue Z21-564 ADU R 09/28/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3006-019-026 203 Avenue P Z21-588 ADU R 10/14/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3008-003-019 38609 Glenraven
Road Z21-625 ADU R 11/08/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3050-002-009 5802 Pearblossom
Highway Z21-632 SFD O 11/15/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3021-034-002 38639 37th Street
East Z21-656 ADU R 11/18/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3204-038-066 41523 Manzanita
Drive Z21-661 SFD O 12/20/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3012-006-010 37820 11th Street
East Z21-685 ADU R 12/08/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3023-083-027 38129 Ranier Drive Z21-689 ADU R 12/13/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3052-029-100 3115 Dolomite
Avenue Z21-689 ADU R 12/13/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3008-002-029 38715 Second
Street East Z21-695 ADU R 12/14/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved 3023-015-015 37340 53rd Street
East Z21-701 ADU R 12/16/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3008-040-012 0
3018-027-036 SPR21-002 5+ R 08/12/2021 149 2 151 151 No Yes Yes Approved 3005-005-010 TTM82636 SFD O 05/26/2021 1 14 0 N o N o N o A p p r o v e d 3019-005-029 3765126th Street
East Z21-064 SFD O 02/11/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3019-005-029 37651 26th Street
East Z21-064 ADU R 02/11/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved
3008-002-006 38714 Carolside
Avenue B21-00298 ADU R 02/08/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00186 SFD O 02/01/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00187 SFD O 02/01/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00188 SFD O 02/01/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00189 SFD O 02/01/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00196 SFD O 02/01/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00197 SFD O 02/01/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00198 SFD O 02/01/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00199 SFD O 02/01/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3206-064-013 3904 Stirrup Court B21-00326 SFD O 02/09/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-003-035 38508 10th Street
East B21-00363 SFD O 02/16/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3018-027-036 2650 E Avenue Q
12 B21-00396 SFD O 02/18/2021 1 1N o N o N o W i t h d r a w n 3014-006-018 38265 15th Street
East B21-00356 SFD O 02/16/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3018-027-036 2650 East Avenue
Q 12 B21-00396 SFD O 02/18/2021 1 1N o N o N o W i t h d r a w n 3050-002-009 5802 Pearblossom
Highway
B21-00830 SFD O 04/13/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g Table A
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
51 Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by H ousehold Incomes (CCR Title 25 §6202)
Density Bonus Applications
10 3018-018-009 38757 27th Street East B21-00659 SFD O 03/23/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-113 41715 62nd Street West B21-00453 SFD O 03/01/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3023-083-005 5351 Monaco Lane B21-01279 ADU R 06/07/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00976 SFD O 04/29/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-00977 ADU R 04/29/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3001-047-012 40327 Nido Court B21-01086 ADU R 05/12/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-015-020 38648 15th Street East B21-01157 ADU R 05/19/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-01345 SFD O 06/10/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-01356 SFD O 06/14/2021 1 1N o N o N o A p p r o v e d B21-01357 SFD O 06/14/2021 1 1N o N o N o A p p r o v e d B21-01358 SFD O 06/14/2021 2 2 No No No Approved SFR and ADU approved B21-01455 SFD O 06/24/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3019-005-029 37651 26th Street East B2101537 ADU R 07/07/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-016-014 38753 17th Street East B21-01631 ADU R 07/14/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3024-047-015 6738 Jack Rabbit Way B21-01739 ADU R 07/26/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 6241 W Avenue M4 B21-01792 ADU R 07/28/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-01881 SFD O 08/09/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-01918 SFD O 08/11/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3101-037-017 41456 Myrtle Street B21-02076 SFD O 08/30/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-169 41740 Cielo Vista Drive B21-02269 SFD O 09/23/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-02281 SFD O 09/23/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-170 41730 Cielo Vista Drive B21-02270 SFD O 09/23/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-171 41720 Cielo Vista Drive B21-02271 SFD O 09/23/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-172 41710 Cielo Vista Drive B21-02272 SFD O 09/23/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-173 41700 Cielo Vista Drive B21-02273 SFD O 09/23/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-174 41658 Cielo Vista Drive B21-02274 SFD O 09/23/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-153 41643 Cielo Vista
Drive
B21-02289 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 6344 Luna Court B21-02290 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-155 6350 Luna Court B21-02291 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-156 6356 Luna Court B21-02292 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-157 6355 Luna Court B21-02293 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-159 41707 Ciela Vista
Dive
B21-02294 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-147 6342 Hermosa
Court
B21-02302 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-151 6347 Hermosa
Court
B21-02303 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-152 41631 Cielo Vista
Drive
B21-02304 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-175 41648 Cielo Vista
Drive B21-02305 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-030-176 41638 Cielo Visa
Drive B21-02306 SFD O 09/27/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3018-027-036 2650 East Avenue Q 12 B21-02407 5+ O 10/06/2021 15 15 Yes-Approved Yes Yes Pending B21-02516 SFD O 10/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-02519 SFD O 10/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-02520 SFD O 10/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-02521 SFD O 10/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-02522 ADU R 10/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-02523 ADU R 10/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-02592 SFD O 10/26/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3001-084-007 4550 Cinnabar
Avenue B21-02740 ADU R 11/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3050-007-001 B21-02743 SFD O 11/10/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-037 38664 13th Street
East B21-02746 SFD O 11/15/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-038 38658 13th Street
East B21-02747 SFD O 11/15/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-039 38652 13th Street
East B21-02748 SFD O 11/15/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-045 1242 East Avenue
Q 2 B21-02829 SFD O 11/17/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3204-038-066 41523 Manzanita
Drive B21-02830 SFD O 11/18/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-040 38651 13th Street
East B21-02844 SFD O 11/18/2021 2 2N o N o N o P e n d i n g Approved SFR with ADU
3015-011-041 38657 13th Street
East B21-02845 SFD O 11/18/2021 2 2N o N o N o P e n d i n g Approved SFR with ADU
3015-011-042 38663 13th Street
West B21-02846 SFD O 11/18/2021 2 2N o N o N o P e n d i n g Approved SFR with ADU
3052-072-030 26629 Little
Sycamore Street B21-02916 ADU O 12/02/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-02929 SFD O 12/06/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-043 1254 East Avenue
Q 2 B21-02963 SFD O 12/07/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-044 1248 east Avenue
Q 2 B21-02964 SFD O 12/07/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-040 38651 13th Street
East B21-02965 ADU R 12/07/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-041 38657 13th Street
East B21-02966 ADU R 12/07/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-011-042 38663 13th Street
East B21-02967 ADU R 12/07/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g 3015-004-024 B21-03041 5+ R 12/07/2021 15 15 No No No Pending B21-03060 SFD O 12/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-03061 SFD O 12/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-03062 SFD O 12/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-03063 SFD O 12/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-03063 SFD O 12/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-03064 SFD O 12/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g B21-03065 SFD O 12/20/2021 1 1N o N o N o P e n d i n g TTM81337 SFD O 09/11/2018 86 86 86 No No No Approved
SPR 20-012 5+ R 09/29/2020 57 57 57 No Yes Yes Approved Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
89 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
How many of
the units were
Extremely Low
Income?
+
Was Project
APPROVED using
GC 65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Y/N
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select multiple
- see instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
30 0 0 0 0 275 0 305 0 0 16 0 0 260 0 276 00
1 10/19/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
30 02/10/2021 30 0N D B
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2020 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2020 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/06/2019 1 1 08/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/06/2019 1 1 08/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 07/21/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 07/21/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/28/2020 1 1 12/16/2021 1 N DB
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/02/2020 1 1 01/27/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/16/2020 1 1 10/06/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/31/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/21/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/21/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/02/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/01/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/02/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 05/27/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/01/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/02/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 7 10
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 03/19/2020 1 1 06/01/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 08/11/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 11/10/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 10/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 11/10/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 08/26/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 08/26/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 09/21/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 09/21/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 08/18/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 09/21/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/27/2020 1 1 01/08/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/27/2020 1 1 03/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/27/2020 1 1 03/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/27/2020 1 1 03/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/27/2020 1 1 03/25/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/27/2020 1 1 03/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 12/15/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/19/2020 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 04/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 04/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 04/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 04/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 04/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 05/06/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 05/06/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 05/06/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 04/08/2020 1 1 01/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 01/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 01/13/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 01/13/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 03/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 03/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 03/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 03/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 03/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 03/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 04/30/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 04/30/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 04/30/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/08/2020 1 1 04/30/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/24/2020 1 1 03/31/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/30/2020 1 1 01/25/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/30/2020 1 1 01/25/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/30/2020 1 1 01/25/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/30/2020 1 1 01/25/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/30/2020 1 1 01/25/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/30/2020 1 1 01/25/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/30/2020 1 1 01/25/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/30/2020 1 1 04/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2020 1 1 04/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2020 1 1 04/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2020 1 1 04/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2020 1 1 04/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2020 1 1 04/27/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2020 1 1 04/27/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2020 1 1 04/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2020 1 1 04/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/05/2020 1 1 06/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/05/2020 1 1 06/16/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/05/2020 1 1 06/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/05/2020 1 1 06/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/05/2020 1 1 06/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/05/2020 1 1 06/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/05/2020 1 1 06/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/05/2020 1 1 06/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/01/2021 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/01/2021 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 02/01/2021 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/01/2021 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/01/2021 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/01/2021 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/01/2021 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/01/2021 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/04/2021 1 1 09/02/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/04/2021 1 1 09/02/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/04/2021 1 1 09/02/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/04/2021 1 1 09/02/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
0 1 03/04/2021 1 1 09/02/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/12/2021 1 1 10/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/12/2021 1 1 10/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/12/2015 1 1 10/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/12/2021 1 1 10/12/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/12/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/12/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/12/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/12/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/12/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 01/07/2021 1 1 11/24/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/14/2020 1 1 03/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/26/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/23/2020 1 1 04/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/23/2020 1 1 04/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/23/2020 1 1 05/26/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/23/2020 1 1 04/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/23/2020 1 1 04/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/23/2020 1 1 05/03/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/23/2020 1 1 05/26/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/23/2020 1 1 05/26/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/23/2020 1 1 06/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/01/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 06/24/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/05/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/05/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/05/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/26/2020 1 1 06/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/26/2020 1 1 06/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 10/26/2020 1 1 06/28/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/26/2020 1 1 06/30/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/26/2020 1 1 06/30/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/26/2020 1 1 06/30/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/26/2020 1 1 06/30/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/26/2020 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/26/2020 1 1 08/31/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/27/2020 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/27/2021 1 1 08/27/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/27/2021 1 1 07/29/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 01/07/2021 1 1 06/02/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/15/2020 1 1 05/27/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/15/2020 1 1 05/27/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/15/2020 1 1 05/27/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/15/2020 1 1 05/27/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/15/2020 1 1 06/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/15/2020 1 1 06/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/15/2020 1 1 06/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/15/2020 1 1 06/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/15/2020 1 1 06/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 1 11/10/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 1 11/10/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 1 12/15/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 1 12/15/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 1 12/15/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 1 11/10/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 1 11/10/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/25/2021 1 1 11/10/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 06/14/2021 1 1 09/21/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 07/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 07/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 07/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 07/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 07/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 07/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 08/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 08/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 08/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 08/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 02/24/2021 1 1 08/19/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/28/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/21/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/09/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/09/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/09/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/15/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/08/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/16/2021 1 1 09/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/16/2021 1 1 09/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/16/2021 1 1 09/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/22/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/22/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 04/22/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/25/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/25/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/25/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/25/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/25/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/25/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/21/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/21/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/21/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/21/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 06/29/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 06/29/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 06/29/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2021 1 1 12/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2021 1 1 12/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2021 1 1 12/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2021 1 1 12/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/24/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/24/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 11/02/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/22/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/28/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/21/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/09/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/09/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/09/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/15/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/14/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/14/2021 1 1 12/01/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/08/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/16/2021 1 1 09/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/16/2021 1 1 09/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/16/2021 1 1 09/20/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/16/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/16/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 03/16/2021 1 1 11/22/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 04/01/2021 1 1 09/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/31/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/13/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/25/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/25/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 11/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 11/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/13/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 05/25/2021 1 1 11/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/25/2021 1 1 11/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 05/26/2021 1 1 12/07/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/21/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/21/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/21/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/21/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 06/29/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 06/29/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 06/29/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2021 1 1 12/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2021 1 1 12/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2021 1 1 12/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 07/08/2021 1 1 12/23/2021 1 N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/23/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/24/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/24/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 08/24/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 09/15/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 12/20/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.
1 10/18/2021 1 0N
Affordability based on current new
home sales price being within
moderate income range.

Jurisdiction Palmdale ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 10/15/2013 - 10/15/2021 (CCR Title 25 §6202) 1 34
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Units to Date (all years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by Income
Level
Deed Restricted - - - - 91 - - - 16 Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - 70 - - 16 - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - 86 62 149 233 260 Above Moderate 2, 332 29 42 95 - - - - - - 166 2,166 5, 452
29 42 95 - 247 62 149 249 276 1, 149 4, 303 Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals and must be rep orted as very low-income units.

Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected]. 108
107
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs.
790 Moderate
1, 395
827
898
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 86 2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
1,288
741
Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will o nly include units that were permitted during the portion o f the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period.

Total RHNA
Total Units
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Jurisdiction Palmdale ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 10/15/2013 - 10/15/2021
Date of Rezone Rezone Type
2 4567 9 1 0 1 1
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Date of Rezone Very Low-
Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Above Moderate-
Income
Rezone Type Parcel Size
(Acres)
General Plan
Designation Zoning Minimum
Density Allowed
Maximum
Density Allowed
Realistic
Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing
Uses
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
83 Project Identifier RHNA Shortfa ll by Household Income Category Sites Description 1 Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Ne ed and No Net-Loss Law Table C
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
123 4
Name of Program Ob jective Timeframe in H.E Status of Pro gram Implementation Density Bonus
Provide a 25% density bonus for
developers who make 10% of units
affordable to households earning 50% of
AMI or 20% of units afforadable to
households earning 60% of AMI
2013-2021 On going program. Met with several Developers to discuss various projects. One agreement recorded.

Second Unit Ordinance
Provide on-going program to approved
second units as required by the Zoning
Ordinance
2013-2021 Zoning Ordinance Updated in 2020. No new actions in 2021.

Mortgage Assistance
Pro
gram
Provide assistance to qualified first-time
homebuyers 2013-2021 On-going program. No new actions taken in 2021.

Mobile Home First Time
Homebuyer Program
Provide down payment assistance to
first time homebuyers who wish to
purchase a new mobile home to be
placed in one of the three City of City-
owned mobile home
parks
2013-2021 On-going program. No new actions taken in 2021.

Affordable Housing Land
Bank
Acquire and assemble parcels for new
construction of affordable single and
multifamily units using Housing set-
aside and other funds
2013-2021 On-going program. No new actions taken in 2021.

Affordable Housing
Construction Program
Provide funding (land and/or low-
interest, deferred interest or residual
receipts) loans to nonprofit affordable
housing organizations to construct new
affordable units to replace units
demolished by public actions and build
new affordable housing
2013-2021 On going program. No new actions taken in 2021. Met with several Developers to discuss various projects with one agreement signed.

Small Lot Consolidation
City to play and active role in facilitating
lot consolidations and offer identified
incentives
2013-2021 On-going program
Large Site Development
City to plays an active role in facilitating
land divisions and lot line adjustments
to assist housing development for lower
income households
2013-2021 Rezoning completed October 2012. No new actions taken in 2021.

Single Family
Rehabilitation Loan
Provide rehabilitation loans to owner-
occupants of single family houses and
mobile homes who earn 80% or less of
AMI
2013-2021 On-going program. No new actions taken in 2021.

Multifamily & Single
Family Rental
Rehabilitation Loans
Low-interest loans to owners of single
and multifamily rental properties 2013-2021 On-going program. No new actions taken in 2021. One ag reement signed.

Rental Housing Inspection
Building & Safety inspection of all
residential rental properties on a regular
schedule
2013-2021 On-going program
Mobile Home Space Rent
Control
Regulates increases in month to month
rent costs for mobile home park spaces
to ensure affordabilit
y
2013-2021 On-going program
Mobile Home Park
Homeownership &
Rehabilitation
Makes loans to eligibile households for
purchase of homes in 3 City-owned
parks
2013-2021 On-going program
Enforcement of Mobile
Home Park Lease Term
Ordinances
Forbids mobile home park owners from
requiring residents to sign lease/rental
that exempts space from rent control
2013-2021 On-going program
Rezoning to Provide
Adequate Sites for RHNA
Rezone land to provide sufficient sites
for Very-Low and Low Income RHNA
allocation
2013-2021 Rezoning completed October 2012. No new actions taken in 2020.

Mortgage Revenue Bond
Issuance of mortgage revenue bonds for
purchase and rehabilitation or new
construction
2013-2021 On-going program
Conversion of At-Risk
Units
Steps to be taken to ensure 303 at-risk
units in 6 projects are not lost through
conversion to market rate units
2013-2021 On-going program
Housing Impact Review
Review housing impacts of proposed
City policies, programs and actions for
consistency with RHNA
2013-2021 On-going program
Housing for Agricultural
Employees & Employee
Housin
g
Amend Zoning Ordinance to comply
with Health and Safety Code Section
17021.5 and 17021.6
2013-2021 Zoning Ordinance Amendment completed in October 2012. No new actions taken in 2021.

Fair Housing Services
City contracts with Housing Rights
Center of Los Angeles to provide public
information, training and investigation
of fair housing complaints
2013-2021 On-going program
Fair Housing Affirmative
Marketing Practices
Provides information to managers of
rental housing who participate in
Partners A
gainst Crime
2013-2021 On-going program
Temporary Dependent
Units
Amend Zoning Ordinance to remove
programs that are no longer compliant
with State law
2013-2021 Zoning Ordinance Amendment completed October 2012. No new actions were taken in 2021.

Senior Housing Develop households for persons 55 or
olde
r 2013-2021 On-going program. No new actions taken in 2021.

Housing for the
Developmentally Disabled
Work with North Los Angeles Regional
Center to implement outreach program 2013-2021 On-going program Transitional and
Supportive Housing
Facilities
Amend the Zoning Ordinance to comply
with Senate Bill 2 2013-2021 Zoning Ordinance Amendment completed October 2012. On-going program. No new actions were taken in 2020.

South Antelope Valley
Emergency Services
Program (SAVES)
Provide administrative funding to
programs which provide services,
referrals, motel vouchers, emergency
food and clothing to homeless and very
low income individuals and families.
2013-2021 Funding for pr ogram is ongoing.

Homeless Persons
Facilities Desi
gnation
Amend Zoning Ordinance in compliance
with Senate Bill 2 2013-2021 Zoning Ordinance Amendment completed October 2012. No new actions taken in 2021.

Handicap Access to
Housing
Requests for Reasonable
Accommodation may be granted in
compliance with the Zoning Ordinance
2013-2021 On-going program
Residential Care Facilities
Permit Large Residential Care Facilities
subject to Site Plan Review approval in
the same way that multifamily housing
is
permitted
2013-2021 Ongoing program. Zoning Ordinance Amendment completed October 2012. No new actions taken in 2021.

Energy & Water
Conservation
Enforce Title 24, Government Code
Section 65591, the Water Conservation
and Landscaping Act and City
Ordinance No. 1262 for water
conservation
2013-2021 On-going program
Neighborhood
Improvement Program
Improve the quality of selected low and
moderate income single family
neighborhoods by enforcing compliance
with building, safety, health, fire and
other applicable regulations
2013-2021 On-going program
Partners Against Crime
(PAC)
Coordinates activities of Code
Enforcement, Housing, Sheriff's
Department, Public Safety, Public
Works, Fire Department and Los
Angeles County Health Services to
address multiple problems of crime and
poor property management and
maintenance in multifamil
y housing
2013-2021 On-going program
Partners for a Better
Palmdale
Strategic planning and programs for
public safety and neighborhood
develo
pment
2013-2021 On-going program
Transit Village Specific
Plan and New
Construction Affordability
A variety of dense housing types
surrounding the Palmdale
Transportation Center
2013-2021 Repealed by City Council on December 15, 2020 and replaced by the Palmdale Transit Area Specific Plan.

TOD Overlay Zone Project
The project will result in an update to
the City General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance to reflect the City's current
vision for TOD within the vicinity of the
PTC and future California High Speed
Rail Station.
2013-2021 Completed
Avenue Q Feasibility Study
The study will determine the feasibility
of developing the Avenue Q Corridor as
a transit-oriented, mixed-use
develo
pment corridor.
2013-2021 Completed
High Speed Rail Project
This project is in partnership with the
California High Speed Rail Authority and
involves station area planning around
the propsed high speed rail multi-modal
station.
2013-2021 Planning and coordination with the High Speed Rail Aut hority is ongoing.

Palmdale Transit Area
Specific Plan
It is the intent of the PTASP to assist
with the systematic implementation of
the General Plan by encouraing
investment and development in the
PTASP area.
2016-Continuous The PTASP was a pproved on December 15, 2020 Avenue Q Corridor Study
Analyzes multimodal transit on a
segment of Avenue Q from 20th Street
East to Sierra Hi
ghway.
2020-2021 On-going
Jurisdiction Palmdale ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 10/15/2013 - 10/15/2021
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
34 APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Units Constructed as Part of Agreement
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7 Table E
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
1 2
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Palmdale ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 10/15/2013 - 10/15/2021 (CCR Title 25 §6202) Extremely Low-
Income+ Very Low-Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+
Extremely Low-
Income+
Very Low-
Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+
Rehabilitation Activity
Preservation of Units At-Risk
Acquisition of Units
Mobilehome Park Preservation
Total Units by Income
Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.

Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be counted, please contact HCD to receive the password that will enable you to populate these fields. The description should adequately document how each unit complies with subsection (c) of Government
Code Section 65583.1+
Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c) Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Palmdale
Reporting Period 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 10/15/2013 - 10/15/2021 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation
23 4
APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Realistic Capacity
Identified in the
Housing Element
Entity to whom the site
transferred Intended Use for Site
1 Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Table G
Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of Project Identifier
NOTE: This table must only be filled out if the housing element sites inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the reporting jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of during the reporting year.

Jurisdiction Palmdale
Note: "+" indicates
an optional field
Reporting Period 2021
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Cells in grey contain
auto-calculation
formulas
Designation Size Notes
1 2 3 4 567
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of
Units
Surplus
Designation
Parcel Size (in
acres) Notes
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Sites
Jurisdiction Palmdale
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 10/15/2013 - 10/15/2021
Current Year
Deed Restricted 30
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 275
0 305
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
SFA 0 0 0
SFD 95 266 270
2 to 4 0 0 0
5+ 151 30 0
ADU 4 9 6
MH 0 0 0
Total 250 305 276
124
306
228
0 0
0 0
0 Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 00 0
Low 00 0
Moderate 00 0
Above Moderate 00 0
Total 00 0
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Total Units Constructed with Streamlining
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Number of Applications for Streamlining
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Developments Approved with Streamlining
Jurisdiction Palmdale
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto‐populated based on amounts entered in rows 15‐26.

Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement
Requested
Other
Funding Notes
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto‐populated from Table A2) Current Year
Deed Restricted 149
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 101
0 250
Current Year
Deed Restricted 30
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
‐$
Task Status
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 275
0 305
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 16
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 260
0 276
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
City Council Staff Report
DATE: MARCH 16, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DIVISION
DISTRICT: ALL
SUBJECT: APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ON PN 835, PALMDALE

SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN IN THE AMOUNT OF
$597,339
ISSUE
Approve agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for professional services on PN 835, Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan, in the amount of $597,339.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for professional services on PN 835, Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan.

2. Authorize the City Manager or her/his designee to execute Agreement No. A-7849, with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. , including minimal and/or non -substantive changes.

BACKGROUND
In October 2019, the City of Palmdale applied for a Sustainable Transportat ion Planning Grant through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to develop the Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan. There was a total of 178 applicants and the City was one of the 77 selected awardees for a portion of about $21.5 million statewide.

DISCUSSION
Through outreach and coordination with stakeholders and the community, this project will allow the City to:
 Develop a multimodal transportation strategy that is inclusive of different transportation modes as well as safety and practical implementation.

Report to Mayor and City Council
Re: Agreement No. A-7849
March 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

 Develop Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Green House Gas (GHG) reduction plan to assist future development of housing in the City in a sustainable manner as well as in compliance with the most recent state legislation.

The City began advertising this project on Planet Bids on January 19, 2022. The deadline to submit proposals was February 17, 2022, at 10 AM. The City received six (6) proposal packages and reviewed each through an evaluation committee. Selection of qualified Consultants was based upon the following scoring methodology:

CATEGORY MAXIMUM VALUE
Understanding of project constraints and requirements PASS/FAIL Team member qualifications 15
Understanding of the safety focus and competency to meet the project needs 20
Understanding of the VMT focus and competency to meet the project needs 20
Understanding of the public outreach focus and competency to meet the project needs 20
Post-project completion components 10
Value-added components 8
Complete and well-prepared proposal 7
Total Earned Value: 0-100
Consultants were required to demonstrate experience in providing similar services to public agencies and validate their approach and management of the project. The following firms submitted proposal packages:

BIDDER LOCATION FINAL RANKING
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Los Angeles, CA 1
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Los Angeles, CA 2
KOA Corporation Monterey Park, CA 3
GHD Sacramento, CA 4
Iteris, Inc. Los Angeles, CA 5
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Irvine, CA 6
The evaluation committee identified Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Alta Planning + Design, Inc., and KOA Corporation as having exceptional qualifications and invited these three firms to participate in interviews for final consultant selection. After the interviews concluded, the evaluation committee determined that Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. had assembled the most qualified team to perform the requested services based on their comprehensive project approach and prior experience on projects of similar scope.

Report to Mayor and City Council
Re: Agreement No. A-7849
March 16, 2022

Page 3 ends

FISCAL IMPACT
The Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan will be funded through State Grant Funds and a local match amount. Grant funds have been allocated to Account No. G0092241 in the amount of $598,100. Local match funds have been allocated to Account No.

G0092101 in the amount of $194,000. This fiscal impact is also detailed in the table below:

SCOPE OF WORK COST
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Grant Funded) $597,339 City Costs (Local Match) $194,000
Total Cost: $792,100
Account Number Starting Balance Remaining Balance
G0092241 $598,100 $761
G0092101 $194,000 $-0-

STRATEGIC PLAN
Goal III: Invest in infrastructure to improve community livability.

C. Plan and maintain safe and attractive neighborhoods, streets, facilities, and public spaces with exciting programming that promotes active fun for everyone.

Prepared by: Chuck Heffernan P.E., Director of Public Works Certified as to availability of Funds: Keith Kang, Finance Manager Approved by: Ronda Perez, Interim City Manager
Approved as to form: Christopher Beck, City Attorney

ATTACHMENTS
Agreement A-7849
AGREEMENT NO. A-7849

CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALMDALE AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

THIS CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES (“Contract” herein) is made and entered into this 16th day of March, 2022 by and between the City of Palmdale a public body corporate and politic, (hereinafter called “CITY”) and KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (hereinafter called “CONSULTANT”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, City desires to engage CONSULTANT to provide certain consultant services; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has the expertise and is qualified to perform the services described in this Contract. And, if required, is duly registered under the laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT desires to accept such engagement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1 DESCRIPTION OF WORK

1.1 The City hereby engages CONSULTANT, and CONSULTANT accepts such engagement, to provide the following services:

Professional services necessary to complete all aspects of the Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan (PN 835), as more specifically described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein.

CONSULTANT shall perform and complete all such work and services in a manner satisfactory to CITY.

1.2 Project deliverables shall be reviewed and approved by CITY to determine acceptable completion. CITY shall have the right to review and inspect the work during the course of its performance at such times as may be specified by CITY.

1.3 CONSULTANT shall not accept any change of scope, or change in contract provisions, unless issued in writing, as a contract change order or amendment and signed by CITY. Any extensions of time must be mutually agreed upon in writing and executed by both parties.

1.4 CITY shall provide to CONSULTANT, without charge, all data, program information, including reports, records, maps, and other information, now in CITY’s possession, which may facilitate the timely performance of the work. 2 CITY PROJECT MANAGER
1-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
To provide the services required by this Contract, CONSULTANT shall act under the authority and approval of a Project Manager appointed by CITY. The City Project Manager will oversee the work under this Contract, assist CONSULTANT with any necessary information, audit billings, and approve payments. CONSULTANT shall channel reports, deliverables and special requests through the City Project Manager. 3 CONSULTANT’S KEY PERSONNEL
CONSULTANT’s Team and Key Personnel are as follows:

Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP (Project Manager)
Jean Fares, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge)
Mike Schmitt, AICP CTP, PTP, RSP (VMT)
Andrew Yi, P.E., T.E. (Advisor)
Jessica Herleaux (Public Outreach)
Monica Villalobos, Ph.D. (Multimodal Strategies)
This Consultant Services Contract has been awarded to CONSULTANT based on its representation that those personnel and subcontractors listed above will perform the portions of the work listed herein. CONSULTANT shall not deviate nor substitute any of these team members without prior written approval by CITY. 4 COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION OF WORK
The execution of this Contract by the parties does not constitute an authorization to proceed. The services of CONSULTANT shall commence when CITY, acting by and through its Project Manager, has issued an Authorization to Proceed. CONSULTANT shall complete all the work described in Section 1 and submit final deliverables no later than February 28, 2023 following CONSULTANT’s receipt of Authorization to Proceed. CONSULTANT shall have no claim for compensation for any services or work, which has not been authorized by CITY’s Authorization to Proceed. 5 TAXES

5.1 CONSULTANT shall pay all sales, consumer, use, and other similar taxes required to be paid by CONSULTANT in accordance with state and local laws.

5.2 CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and shall have no power or authority to incur any debt, obligation or liability on behalf of CITY. No person employed by CONSULTANT or acting on its behalf, in connection with this Contract shall be considered the Agent or employee of CITY.

5.3 CONSULTANT shall be required to obtain a current City of Palmdale business license, as required by the Palmdale Municipal Code, before an Authorization to Proceed is issued.
6 PATENT FEES AND ROYALTIES
2-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
CONSULTANT shall pay all license fees and royalties and assume all costs incident to the use, in the performance of the work or the incorporation in the work of any invention, design, process, product or device which is the subject of patent rights or copyrights held by others. If a particular invention, design, process, product or device is specified by CITY for use in the performance of the work and if, to the actual knowledge of CITY, its use is subject to patent rights or copyrights calling for the payment of any license fee or royalty to others, the existence of such rights shall be disclosed by CITY in the contract documents. CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY and anyone directly or indirectly employed by CITY from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including attorneys' fees) arising out of any infringement of patent rights or copyrights incident to the use in the performance of the work, or resulting from the incorporation in the work of any invention, design, process, product or device not specified by CITY, and shall defend all such claims in connection with any alleged infringement of such rights. 7 STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of its services and work and documents resulting there from, and CITY shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies therein. CONSULTANT shall correct any such deficiencies or errors without additional compensation and without cost to CITY, except to the extent any such deficiency is directly attributable to deficiencies in CITY-furnished information.
8 CONSULTANT’S PERSONNEL

8.1 All services required under this Contract shall be performed by CONSULTANT, or under CONSULTANT’S direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits and licenses required by State and local law to perform such services.

8.2 CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing services required by this Contract, and compliance with all reasonable performance standards established by CITY.

8.3 CONSULTANT shall be responsible for payment of all CONSULTANT’s employees’ and subcontractor’s wages and benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to the employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security.

8.4 CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY, and its respective officers, agents and employees from and against all claims, demands, damages or costs arising from CONSULTANT’s acts or omissions with respect to any liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature arising from alleged violations of personnel practices.
3-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
9 COMPENSATION

9.1 For all of work and services including the various phases of tasks as described in Section 1, CITY shall pay to CONSULTANT an amount not to exceed the sum of Five-Hundred Ninety-Seven Thousand, Three-Hundred Thirty-Nine dollars ($597339), payable as follows:

Project fee schedule is attached hereto in Exhibit A and incorporated herein.

The Contract Price is CONSULTANT’S estimate of its charges for all the services, including all labor, equipment, material, subcontractor, and reimbursable costs, to be provided under this Agreement. Progress payments shall be made on a time and material basis. Final payment shall be made upon completion of all services and City acceptance of all deliverables, not-to-exceed the Contract Price.

9.2 CONSULTANT shall perform no work in excess of the total contract price without prior written approval of CITY. Total contract price includes expenses related to travel to and from CITY to meet with City and to appear, if so required, before City Council or any other board or commission of CITY.

9.3 CONSULTANT shall maintain adequate records and shall permit inspection and audit by CITY of CONSULTANT’s charges under this Contract. CONSULTANT shall make such records available to CITY during normal business hours upon reasonable notice. Nothing herein shall convert such records into public records, and they will be available only to CITY and any specified public agencies. Such records shall be maintained by CONSULTANT for one (1) year following completion of the work under this Contract unless a longer period of time is required by state or federal law, in which event CONSULTANT shall retain its records for the time required by such laws.

9.4 No payment made hereunder by CITY to CONSULTANT, shall be construed as an acceptance by CITY of any work or materials, nor as evidence of satisfactory performance by CONSULTANT of its obligations under this Contract. 10 INDEMNIFICATION
To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT and any contractors or subcontractors working on its behalf agree to indemnify CITY, its officers, employees, agents and elected and appointed boards (hereinafter “Indemnified Parties”) for any loss, claim, demand, cause of action, cost, expense, damage, obligation or liability which arises out of or is in any way connected with the performance of any work under this agreement, including any acts or omissions, willful misconduct or negligent conduct, whether active or passive, on the part of CONSULTANT, its contractors or subcontractors, and regardless of any acts, omissions or negligence (whether active or passive) of any person or entity indemnified hereunder. At their own expense, CONSULTANT and, as applicable, any contractors or subcontractors working on its behalf, shall defend any suit, claim or action against the Indemnified Parties founded 4-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
upon such loss, claim, demand, cause of action, cost, expense, damage, obligation or liability. CONSULTANT shall ensure that the contract of any contractor or subcontractor working under this agreement contain an indemnity agreement, requiring the contractor or subcontractor to indemnify and defend the Indemnified Parties pursuant the terms set forth above. CONSULTANT shall indemnify the Indemnified Parties, and save it harmless from any and all loss, damage, costs, expenses and attorney's fees suffered or incurred on account of any breach of the aforesaid obligations and covenants, and any other provision or covenant of this agreement.
11 INSURANCE

11.1 CONSULTANT, at its expense, shall maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under this Contract not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers listed “A” or better in the Best’s Insurance Guide and authorized to do business in the State of California.

Proof of Insurance, as identified in Section 11.8, must be reviewed and accepted by the City Attorney.

11.1.1 Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability
 Workers’ Compensation—coverage as required by the State of California  Employer’s Liability:
$1,000,000.00 each accident
$1,000,000.00 policy limit bodily injury
$1,000,000.00 each employee bodily injury by disease

11.1.2 Professional Liability Insurance*
 $1,000,000.00 with no deductible, or;
 Comparable alternative as determined by the City Attorney; and  Policy form on a claims-made basis

11.1.3 Commercial General Liability
 $1,000,000.00 limit on a per occurrence basis
 $2,000,000.00 general aggregate limit

11.1.4 Commercial Automobile Liability
 $1,000,000.00 combined single limit including owned, non-owned and hired automobile coverage

11.2 All of CONSULTANT’s policies shall contain an endorsement providing that written notice shall be given to CITY at least thirty- (30) calendar days prior to termination, cancellation or reduction of coverage in the policy.

11.3 Policies providing for bodily injury and property damage coverage shall contain the following:
5-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
A. An endorsement extending coverage to the CITY as an additional insured, in the same manner as the named insured, as respects liability arising out of the performance of any work under the Contract. Such insurance shall be primary insurance, as respects the interest of the CITY, and any other insurance maintained by the CITY shall be considered excess coverage and not contributing insurance with the insurance required hereunder. The certificate and endorsements shall state: “The City of Palmdale, the Successor Agency of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Palmdale, Palmdale Civic Authority, Industrial Development Authority of the City of Palmdale, Palmdale Airport Authority, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers are named as additional insureds.”
B. “Severability of Interest” clause.

11.4 Promptly on execution of this Contract, and prior to commencement of any work, CONSULTANT shall deliver to CITY certificates of insurance and endorsements to all required policies demonstrating that CONSULTANT has the required coverage and showing the required named insureds. Within five (5) days of written request from CITY, CONSULTANT shall deliver to CITY full and complete copies of all insurance policies required by this Contract.

11.5 The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance to be maintained by CONSULTANT are not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify CONSULTANT’s liabilities and obligations under this Contract.

11.6 Any policy or policies of insurance that CONSULTANT elects to carry as insurance against loss or damage to its equipment and tools or other personal property used in the performance of this Contract shall include a provision waiving the insurer’s right of subrogation against CITY.

11.7 All insurance coverage must be maintained throughout the duration of this Contract.

11.8 Acceptable Proof of Insurance:

11.8.1 ACORD Certificate of Insurance listing all coverages, limits, deductibles and insureds; and endorsements for all applicable coverages if agent has authority to issue it. Additional insured Form CG20101185 or CG20100707 and CG20370704 or equivalent must be provided for general liability coverage. Additional insured form CA0001 must be provided for automobile liability coverage.

11.8.2 Agents must confirm that policy endorsements have been ordered from the respective insurance companies. Upon issuance, policy endorsements listing all insurers must be submitted to the City Attorney.

11.8.3 *When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis”, CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of five (5) years after this Agreement 6-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any acts or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.

11.9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Contract, CITY may immediately terminate this Contract if, at any time CONSULTANT fails to maintain the required insurance for any period of time or fails to comply with any of the insurance requirements listed above.
12 TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE
CITY reserves the right to terminate this Contract or any part thereof for its sole convenience with fifteen (15) days written notice. In the event of such termination, CONSULTANT shall immediately stop all work hereunder, and shall immediately cause any of its suppliers and sub-consultants to cease such work. CONSULTANT shall also surrender to CITY all finished or unfinished documents or programs and other materials, which shall be City’s property. As compensation in full for services performed to the date of such termination, the CONSULTANT shall receive an amount equal to the value of the work completed as of the termination date in accordance with the fee schedule or as negotiated between the parties. In no event shall the amount payable upon termination exceed the total maximum compensation provided for in this Contract.
13 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE

13.1 If the CITY determines that the CONSULTANT has failed to supply an adequate working force, or to provide services of proper quality, or has failed in any other respect to satisfactorily perform the services specified in this Contract, the CITY shall give written notice to the CONSULTANT specifying all defaults to be remedied within thirty (30) days. Such notice shall set forth the basis for the CITY’s dissatisfaction and suggest corrective measures. If, after thirty (30) days, the CONSULTANT has failed to implement the corrective measures, the CITY may elect to terminate this Contract, in whole or in part.

13.2 In the event the CITY terminates this Contract in whole or in part as provided herein above, the CITY may procure, upon such terms and in such manner, as it may deem appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

13.3 If this Contract is terminated as provided above, the City may require the CONSULTANT to provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, software, drawings, maps, photographs, reports, etc., prepared by the CONSULTANT. Upon such termination, the CONSULTANT shall be paid an amount equal to the value of the services provided and work performed as of the date of termination. Such payment by the City may take into consideration the costs 7-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
associated with hiring another CONSULTANT to complete the services. In the event no new CONSULTANT is employed, the CONSULTANT shall be paid an amount equal to the value of the work performed. In ascertaining the value of the work performed up to the date of termination, consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete documents when such are delivered to CITY, and to authorized reimbursement expenses.

The above is in addition to any other remedies available by law or equity to the CITY.

13.1 If, after notice of termination of the Contract under the provisions of this Section 13, it is determined, for any reason, that CONSULTANT was not in default, or that the default was excusable, then the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the notice of termination had been issued pursuant to Section 12. 14 DISPUTE RESOLUTION
All claims, disputes, and other matters in question between CITY and CONSULTANT arising out of, or relating to this Contract, or the breach thereof shall, to the extent reasonably feasible, be resolved through good faith negotiations between the parties. 15 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All documents, including, but not limited to, research, field notes, investigations, analysis, and studies which are prepared in the performance of this Contract are to be, and remain the property of CITY. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY, upon its request, originals or reproducible or electronic copies of reports, studies and of all other documents listed above.
16 SUBCONTRACTING, DELEGATION AND ASSIGNMENT

16.1 CONSULTANT shall not delegate, subcontract or assign its duties or rights hereunder, either in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of CITY; provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to CONSULTANT from CITY under this Contract may be assigned to a bank, trust company or other financial institution without such approval. Any proposed delegation, assignment or subcontract shall provide a description of the services covered, identification of the proposed assignee, delegates or subcontractor, and an explanation of why and how the same was selected, including the degree of competition involved. Any proposed agreement with an assignee, delegates or subcontractor shall include the following:

A. The amount involved, together with CONSULTANT’s analysis of such cost or price; and
B. A provision requiring that any subsequent modification or amendment shall be subject to the prior written consent of CITY; and
C. The requirement to hire only those persons authorized by federal law to work in the United States.
8-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT

16.2 Any assignment, delegation or subcontract shall be made in the name of CONSULTANT and shall not bind or purport to bind CITY and shall not release CONSULTANT from any obligations under this Contract including, but not limited to, the duty to properly supervise and coordinate the work of employees, assignees, delegates and subcontractors. No such assignment, delegation or subcontract shall result in any increase in the amount of total compensation payable to CONSULTANT under this Contract.
17 NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

17.1 In performance of this Contract, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of sex, color, race, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, marital status, sexual orientation, or age. CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their sex, color, race, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, marital status, sexual orientation or age. Affirmative action relating to employment shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

17.2 The provisions of subsection 17.1 above shall be included in all solicitations or advertisements placed by or on behalf of CONSULTANT for personnel to perform any services under this Contract. CITY shall have access to all documents, data and records of CONSULTANT and its subcontractors for purposes of determining compliance with the equal employment opportunity and non-discrimination provisions of this Section, and all applicable provisions of Executive Order No. 11246 which is incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of Executive Order No. 11246 is available for inspection at, and on file with, the Palmdale City Clerk’s Office. 18 FINANCIAL INTEREST CERTIFICATION

18.1 CONSULTANT warrants that no person has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this Contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee; and that no officer or employee of the CITY has any interest, financially or otherwise, in CONSULTANT’s firm.

18.2 For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to annul this Contract without liability, or at its discretion to deduct from the Contract Price or consideration, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee.
19 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

19.1 CONSULTANT stipulates that its officers and employees do not now have a conflict of interest and it further agrees for itself, its officers and its employees that it will not contract for or accept employment for the performance of any work or 9-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
services with any individual business, corporation or government unit that would create a conflict of interest in the performance of its obligations pursuant to this Contract or which would cause CONSULTANT to be “financial interested” (as provided in California Government Code Section 1090 et seq. or 87100 et seq.) in any contract or decision made by CITY on any matter.

19.2 CONSULTANT shall not employ any Housing Authority/City official or employee to perform any work required pursuant to this Contract.

19.3 If CONSULTANT is a registered professional engineer or licensed land surveyor and the scope of work requires CONSULTANT’S recommendation of the actual formula to spread the costs of an assessment district’s improvements, then CONSULTANT shall not participate in making that recommendation if the additional elements set forth in Government Code section 87100.1(c) apply. Those additional elements are: (1) CONSULTANT has received income of $250 or more for professional services in connection with any parcel included in the benefit assessment district within twelve (12) months prior to the creation of the district; and (2) the district includes other parcels in addition to those parcels for which CONSULTANT received the income. In the event a conflict of interest does arise in that context, CITY shall select a different CONSULTANT to recommend the actual formula to spread the costs of the assessment district’s improvements and the costs of such services shall be deducted from the compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT.

19.4 To the extent required by the City Manager/designee, CONSULTANT shall complete and file with the City Clerk a Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests disclosing any reportable property interests, income, gifts, investments, or business positions.
20 COMPLIANCE WITH LAW

20.1 CONSULTANT shall comply with all state and federal laws, including but not limited to, the requirement to hire only those persons authorized by federal law to work in the United States. If CONSULTANT uses any subcontractors to complete this Contract, this same requirement shall be included in all subcontracts and strictly enforced by CONSULTANT.

20.2 The law of the state of California shall govern this Contract. The venue of any legal action, either formal or informal, shall be the County of Los Angeles. 21 NOTICES
Any notice required under this Contract shall be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at its address on the signature page and given personally or by registered or certified mail postage prepaid, or by a commercial courier service. All notices shall be effective upon the date of receipt.
10-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
22 ENTIRE CONTRACT AND AMENDMENTS

22.1 This Contract is the complete agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior proposals, agreements, and understandings between the parties and may not be modified or terminated orally.

22.2 No attempted waiver of any of the provisions hereof, nor any modification in the nature, extent or duration of the work to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder, shall be binding unless in writing and signed by the party against whom the same is sought to be enforced.

22.3 The failure of any party to enforce against another party any provision of this Contract shall not constitute a waiver of that party’s right to enforce such a provision at a later time, and shall not serve to vary the terms of this Contract. 11-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT

23 ATTORNEY’S FEES
If any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce or interpret any provisions of this Contract, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees, costs and necessary disbursements, in addition to such other relief as may be sought and awarded.

In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed and attested by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

CITY OF PALMDALE: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.:

Ronda Perez Date
Interim City Manager

Jean Fares, P.E. Date
Senior Vice President

ADDRESS FOR NOTICE:

CITY OF PALMDALE
38250 Sierra Highway
Palmdale, CA 93550

ADDRESS FOR NOTICE:

KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2050
Los Angeles, CA 90017
APPROVE AS TO FORM:

Christopher L. Beck
City Attorney

ATTEST:

Shanae S. Smith
City Clerk
ATTEST: If Corporation

Secretary

12-12Concord - Document ID: generated after first signature DRAFT
Prepared for:

Professional Services for
the Palmdale Sustainable
Transportation Plan,
PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
Prepared by:

EXHIBIT "A" - 1 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter ............................................................................................................................................ 1

1. Overview and Team Members ..........................................................................................................2 Overview of Primary Consulting Firm ......................................................................................2 Overview of Subconsultant Firms ............................................................................................. 5 Project Management Procedures ...............................................................................................7

2. Objectives, Tasks, and Deliverables ............................................................................................... 12 Project Understanding ............................................................................................................ 12 Roadway Safety Analysis and Countermeasures ................................................................... 12 VMT Evaluation and Reduction Strategy ............................................................................... 14 Framework for Evaluating a Fee-Based VMT Mitigation Program ......................................17 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................. 19 Guiding Questions ...................................................................................................................... 23

3. Previous Relevant Experience ........................................................................................................26 Relevant Project Examples .......................................................................................................26

4. Project Budget and Timeline ...........................................................................................................29 Project Schedule .........................................................................................................................29 Budgeting Proposal ....................................................................................................................30 Standard Forms ..................................................................................................................................... A There are 10 types of people in this
world: those who understand binary,
and those who don’t.

The optimist sees the glass as half full.

The pessimist sees the glass as half
empty. The engineer sees the glass as
twice as big as it needs to be.

EXHIBIT "A" - 2 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
660 South Figueroa Street
Suite 2050
Los Angeles, CA 90017
213.261.4040
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 1

COVER LETTER
February 17, 2022
Ruben Hovanesian
City of Palmdale Public Works
38250 Sierra Hwy
Palmdale, CA 93550
RE: Proposal and Qualifications for Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan – PN 835 Dear Mr. Hovanesian and Members of the Selection Committee:

The City of Palmdale (City) is seeking the assistance of a qualified consultant in the preparation of a Sustainable Transportation Plan. The plan will specifically focus on improving traffic safety and reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the City through the identification of locally relevant strategies. The plan will need excellent technical analysis in coordination with a robust stakeholder and public outreach campaign to yield a plan that accomplishes these goals in an implementable and politically feasible package. As an industry leader in safety, traffic analysis, VMT studies, and sustainable transportation, Kimley-Horn is well-qualified and dedicated to providing unique consulting services to the City for your Sustainable Transportation Plan. We bring the established experience to develop the plan that is tailored to your local procedures, desires, and issues while maintaining accordance with state and federal guidelines, including those needed to qualify for future Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds. The following benefits prove that Kimley-Horn is well-suited to support the City on this project:

Familiarity with FHWA and Caltrans Safety Analysis Guidelines. Kimley-Horn is devoted to supporting local agencies in recommending safety enhancements in areas throughout California. Our team’s knowledge ranges from traffic safety planning and engineering to bicycle and pedestrian facility planning, safety, and design. We have completed LRSPs and Systemic Safety Analysis Reports (SSARs), Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) projects, Road Safety Audits (RSAs), Safety Management Plans (SMPs), data collection and crash analysis, and design of safety countermeasures throughout the country, including for the cities of Santa Clarita, Artesia, Lancaster, Ventura, Anaheim, San Clemente, Seal Beach, Costa Mesa, Eastvale, Chino, Perris, Goleta, Palm Desert, La Quinta, Santa Cruz, and Sunnyvale as well as the counties of Imperial and Ventura. Our previous experience and lessons learned from these projects have afforded us the information to develop effective and cost-efficient LRSPs. Kimley-Horn’s familiarity with the LRSP process will assure your project is accomplished successfully.

We supported agencies in collecting over $30M in funding in HSIP Cycle 10, and look forward to working with the City of Palmdale in Cycle 11.

Statewide Leadership in SB 743, SB 375, and VMT Reduction Strategies. Out firm has supported many agencies in California as they have worked to adapt to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) VMT metrics for environmental analyses. Our team is ready to help the City of Palmdale navigate the challenges associated with measuring VMT, forecasting VMT, mitigating VMT—all while achieving local housing and economic development goals. Our team developed the Trip Reduction and Environmental Dashboard (TREDLite) to provide an easy and replicable process for assessing the VMT impacts of proposed development. Our team has also led the development of several Sustainable Community Strategies as part of the development of Regional Transportation Plans. Clients we have developed VMT reduction strategies for include Riverside County, the City of Pasadena, the City of Santa Cruz, Monterey County, and many more.

Local Management and Commitment to Your Success. Through our established past, Kimley-Horn proves that we are dedicated to surpassing expectations and serving local cities alike. Project manager and point of contact Darryl dePencier, AICP , GISP , RSP2B brings more than 15 years of professional experience in transportation planning including over 40 local safety plans in California, and several SB 743 guidance updates. For this endeavor, Darryl will be supported by principal-in-charge Jean Fares, P .E., who brings 30 years of professional traffic and transportation engineering experience to the project, along with additional technical support from Mike Schmitt, AICP CTP , PTP RSP1, and an abundant staff of specialists and planning professionals.

The Kimley-Horn team is also joined by Arellano Associates, LLC to support the stakeholder and public engagement effort, Vicus Planning to assist with an equity focused multimodal plan, and LSY Enterprise to provide additional local context and experience. Should you have any questions about our proposal or necessitate any additional information, please contact our project manager Darryl dePencier, AICP , GISP , RSP2B at 213.261.4039, at [email protected], or at the address listed above.

Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Darryl dePencier, AICP , GISP , RSP2B Jean Fares, P .E.* Project Manager/Point of Contact Senior Vice President/Principal-in-Charge with signing authority EXHIBIT "A" - 3 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 2

1. OVERVIEW AND TEAM MEMBERS

OVERVIEW OF PRIMARY

CONSULTING FIRM
Kimley-Horn
Kimley-Horn is a full-service, employee-owned consulting firm offering comprehensive and innovative traffic engineering, civil engineering, environmental engineering, and development review services to public agencies throughout California. The firm currently has more than 5,500 professional, technical, and support personnel in 99 offices across the country, with 11 offices in California.

Since our founding
in 1967, Kimley-
Horn has grown
from a small group
of traffic engineers
to a multidisciplinary
consulting firm
recognized as a
leader in full-service
engineering consulting. According to Engineering News-Record, our firm now ranks as the 15th largest transportation firm in the country. We offer clients the local knowledge and responsiveness of a small organization, backed by the depth of resources only a national firm can offer. The Kimley-Horn team is committed to continuing to provide the City of Palmdale with high-quality solutions that exceed your expectations. We accomplish this by providing you with a team of experienced and technically proficient individuals who offer extensive active transportation planning and design expertise. Our long-term association with public agencies provides us with comprehensive project experience and knowledge.

Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
Kimley-Horn understands that an LRSP is a proactive approach to safety analysis. Existing crash patterns show part of the safety picture, but only show us where crashes have occurred, not necessarily where conditions that elevate the risk of crashes exist.

An LRSP is intended to identify high crash locations within a city or county and diagnose what conditions might contribute to that elevated crash activity. The LRSP then identifies countermeasures that can be applied systemically throughout the city or county where those conditions exist to remove those higher risk conditions before crashes occur. We recognize that an LRSP is not fixed in its scope or breadth and that each jurisdiction faces unique safety challenges, driver behavior patterns, and historical roadway development. Our approach is to explore what is normal within the City of Cudahy. In an effort to provide completeness and to set safety benchmarks customized for the City, our approach will be to:
 Refine the work plan with City staff
 Conduct a citywide network screening to establish crash rate benchmarks for intersections and roadway segments
 Identify locations with the highest crash volumes and highest risk factors based on network screening (from the designated corridors and intersections)
 Map crash patterns at higher crash locations
 Conduct field review of higher crash locations
 Identify countermeasures that would likely reduce crashes  Establish template projects and benefit/cost assessments to produce short, medium, and long-term projects that the City can pursue funding for
 Actively engage with stakeholders
 Focus on driver behavior factors as well as roadway engineering

CITY LRSPS, SSARPS, AND RSSAS
14 Sunnyvale SSARP
15 Goleta SSARP
16 Ventura SSARP
17 Santa Clarita SSARP/LRSP
18 Lancaster SSARP
19 Artesia LRSP
20 Anaheim LRSP
21 Eastvale SSARP
22 La Quinta SSARP
23 Perris LRSP
24 Imperial Beach LRSP
25 Moreno Valley RSA / RSSA
26 Santa Cruz LRSP
27 Palm Desert LRSP
28 Citrus Heights LRSP
29 Roseville LRSP
30 Rocklin LRSP
31 South San Francisco LRSP
32 Rancho Cordova LRSP
33 Indio LRSP
34 San Clemente LRSP
35 Costa Mesa LRSP
36 Seal Beach LRSP
37 Tracy LRSP
38 Hollister LRSP
39 San Juan Bautista LRSP
40 Santa Maria LRSP
in other states
OVER
135
LRSPs
41 Lincoln LRSP
42 Simi Valley LRSP
43 Agoura Hills LRSP
44 West Hollywood LRSP
45 Chino LRSP
46 Menifee LRSP
47 Corona LRSP
48 Cudahy LRSP
49 Compton LRSP

COUNTY LRSPS,

SSARPS, AND RSSAS
1 Nevada County RSSA
2 Placer County RSSA
3 Marin County RSSA
4 San Joaquin County SSARP
5 Calaveras County RSSA
6 Stanislaus County RSSA
7 Mono County SSARP
8 Monterey County RSSA
9 Ventura County LRSP
10 Imperial County RSSA
11 San Benito County LRSP
12 Sutter County LRSP
13 El Dorado County LRSP
¨§¦
80 ¨§¦
40 ¨§¦
15 ¨§¦
10 ¨§¦
8 ¨§¦
5 ¨§¦
580
¨§¦
80 ¨§¦
280
101
101
99 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 37
38 39
40 15
17 16
42 43
44 18
19 20
22 24
47 48
49 34
35 36
21 23
26 27
33 28
41 29
30 31
32 45
46 25

STATEWIDE SAFETY PROJECTS
» California Strategic Highway Safety Plan
» California Strategic Performance Measures Targets
» California Highway Safety Improvement Program
Implementation Plan
◢ Vehicle Miles Traveled
The team for this project has been selected to prepare the policy and thresholds for more than 25 jurisdictions (including three counties) in California and have completed countless VMT projects. Our team has presented more than 100 times on the subject throughout the state, were participants in both the ITE California SB 743 Task Force and Caltrans SB 743 Implementation Technical Roundtable, and most recently, presented two VMT abstracts at the Western ITE Conference.

Not only do we know SB 743 forwards and backwards, and know how to address its complexities, we know how to make it easier to handle.

In addition, we are specialists in Transportation Impact Fees.

With our highly experienced team of professionals, Kimley-Horn has amassed significant experience with VMT analyses and SB 743 compliance including:
 Establishing more than 25 California public agencies (i.e., cities, counties, and airports) thresholds, policies, and custom VMT calculation tools for SB 743 compliance
55YEARS
99OFFICES
5,500+

EMPLOYEES
EXHIBIT "A" - 4 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 3
 Completing dozens of project-level VMT assessments using a variety of methods, including TDM, GIS, Big Data, and qualitative techniques
 Presenting SB 743 educational materials more than 100 times to audiences including dozens of public agencies, the ITE and AEP  Authoring SB 743 related National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) reports and abstracts that have been accepted into and presented at ITE’s Western Conference
From this
experience, we
understand that
while the California’s
Office of Planning
and Research
(OPR) guidance
related to SB 743
has been a helpful
introduction to using
VMT to evaluate
projects, it does not
provide a complete
solution. There
are a multitude of
complex practical
issues, including many land use types, that are not addressed by the OPR guidance. Our experience has provided us with the ability to quickly evaluate a project’s VMT impact on the regional roadway network and identify implementable mitigation strategies.

To date, we have built significant experience implementing VMT mitigation across most of the state based on the application of TDMs and the identification of infrastructure/project-based solutions both at a program and project level. In addition to including mitigation strategies in all of the 25+ SB 743 implementation programs we have been responsible for, we have been working with several jurisdictions, including the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) and Santa Cruz County, to begin planning their VMT-Banking/Exchange programs. Most recently we completed a VMT Banking Program in the City of Salinas. Programmatic approaches that rely on collectively funding projects appear to hold great promise for VMT mitigation as they allow a project to obtain an amount of mitigation commensurate with their impact, make a single payment, and avoid the complexity of ongoing TDM management, and do not require mitigation monitoring.

Programmatic approaches can also provide a public benefit in terms of funding transportation improvements that would not otherwise be constructed, resulting in improvements to congestion, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, increased transportation choices, and additional opportunities for active transportation.
◢ Alternative Transportation Planning and Design
Kimley-Horn recognizes the importance of planning and designing for alternative modes of transportation—whether bicycle, pedestrian, or transit. Kimley-Horn employs state-of-the-art techniques to accommodate and encourage the use of alternative modes
of transportation and minimize vehicular conflicts. One of the most common factors discouraging biking and walking is safety concerns – our safety planning expertise helps us understand how to lower Level of Traffic Street (LTS), enhance safety in high- risk areas, and also encourage mode-shift. Our team members have led numerous pedestrian and bicycle planning and design projects throughout the country, from single-intersection bike lane improvements to safe routes to school programs and active transportation master plans. Knowledge of active transportation planning principles and the differences among various user groups leads Kimley-Horn engineers and planners toward the philosophy that one size does not fit all circumstances. Beginner and intermediate cyclists prefer protected bike lanes and off-road facilities while advanced cyclists may prefer paved shoulders and wide outside lanes on major roadways. Plans developed by Kimley-Horn emphasize interconnected networks of different types of facilities to serve different types of users and remove barriers to underserved neighborhoods and key community destinations.

Our team members have planned for and designed some of the most innovative bikeways in California – protected bikeways with bend- outs, bike boulevards with diversions, and center running bikeway – we know how to plan projects that can really be built! We are familiar with the latest standards and guidelines and we work with our clients to develop bike facilities that are feasible, constructible, and cost-effective.
◢ Community Engagement
Kimley-Horn is sensitive to the pivotal role of meaningful public engagement programs that enable area residents to communicate and assist with the realization of their collective priorities. Public engagement determines the overall design program, funding strategies, and implementation priorities. Our expertise in providing a broad range of services helps create a successful implementation of your goals while addressing the specific challenges that each project entails. Kimley-Horn is known for developing innovative approaches to projects that involve meaningful and productive public engagement.

We understand that projects’ success, as gauged by the residents, is often rooted in the perception of the thoughtfulness of the formal public engagement activities. Accordingly, we have developed effective methods of bringing the community into the process. We are strongly committed to conducting public participation programs that educate, inform, and build consensus for a particular solution, and we have professionals on staff who are native Spanish speakers experienced in conducting bilingual outreach services. Some of our public involvement services include interactive websites, newsletters, town hall meetings, stakeholder meetings, press releases, brochures, educational seminars, and PowerPoint presentations.
◢ Integrating Land Use and Transportation
Planning Principles and Practices
Our team is comprised of experts in land use planning, transportation, mobility, engineering, and environmental clearance who focus on local government policy and programs. We understand the integrated nature of transportation, mobility, and land use and our collective expertise enables our team to view projects from a “360-degree” view.

We employ this philosophy in all our planning efforts. Our team has EXHIBIT "A" - 5 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 4
developed comprehensive land use and transportation policy plans for numerous jurisdictions throughout California and are well-versed in the new legislative requirements, including AB 1358, the Complete Streets Act, AB 32, and SB 375. Kimley-Horn understands that quality of life in a community can be improved by efficient mobility through transportation projects and services that produce greater efficiency, reduce trips, and provide more choices. Our project experience includes a wide variety of transportation modes, including transit, roadways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

The Planning process will consider the land use implications of transportation policies and programs and provide land use planning that is integrated into the process so that land use considerations reinforce and further support sustainable transportation concepts. ◢ Mobility Hubs
Shared mobility hubs create an opportunity to leverage existing resources to develop dynamic transportation nodes that can serve more people, more effectively. A shared mobility hub uses technology, multimodal access, and an array of services to reach an entire community. The Kimley-Horn team will look for opportunities to eliminate the multimodal infrastructure gaps and plan for full access to the mobility hubs in the City. Kimley-Horn identifies opportunities to enhance existing infrastructure to better meet the multi-faceted transportation needs of the surrounding communities of Palmdale. ◢ Complete Street and First/Last Mile Modal
Connectivity Concepts
Having completed over 70 Complete Streets projects and integrating the requirements of AB 1358 in numerous General Plan updates, we have a broad range of experience in highly urbanized to rural environments. We have employed context sensitive solutions for locally specific challenges (such as unique challenges in warmer climates). First and Last Mile connectivity concepts have been addressed in our projects to overcome the challenges of getting people to and from the transportation network and transportation facilities through land use integration, bike sharing, trail interconnectivity, intelligent transportation system solutions, and other applicable physical improvements. As a founding member of the Complete Streets Coalition and with a growing portfolio of both planned and constructed complete and green streets throughout California, Kimley-Horn understands that planning and designing streets for all users involves a multidisciplinary approach that goes well beyond simple lane restriping or “road diets”.

It requires peeling back the layers of the street’s obvious and visible functions to fully understand its hidden, lesser known, and indirect functions—functions unrelated to multimodal mobility but important when truly considering all users. Our decades of experience planning, designing, and implementing complete streets in urban areas has taught us some key considerations.

We have a unique understanding of both public and private development given that we provide a full complement of services to a broad base of clients. This has educated us to consider the full environment (private development, land use, regulations, zoning, transit, maintenance, and the cost implications of design, etc.).

Understanding and responding to these key considerations allows Kimley-Horn to provide reasonable and practical design solutions that will not detract from the functionality of the street and the overall transportation network.
◢ Transit-Oriented Development and
Multi-Modalism
Kimley-Horn understands that the benefits of transit-orientation and mixed-use development go beyond improving the efficiency of the transportation system. A diversity of uses combining residential with retail, employment, entertainment, and civic uses creates neighborhoods and unique places that are economically vital with lasting value and character for the community. Successful mixed-use districts improve the viability of local shops and businesses, increase housing options, provide social diversity, increase personal safety and convenience, and most importantly, offer people choices.

Transportation choice is a primary benefit of transit-oriented and mixed-use districts. By creating compact pedestrian and transit- oriented places, people can choose to walk to local destinations, use transit, or choose not to own a car because of the opportunities afforded by a diversity of uses and transportation modes. Land use diversity in close proximity encourages walking and bicycling for everyday needs, reducing the demand on local streets improving air quality, and resulting in a more effective circulation system. ◢ State and Federal Environmental Rules
and Regulations
Kimley-Horn has extensive experience assisting local jurisdictions navigate through the increasingly complex processes required by CEQA and NEPA, and additional legislation such as SB 375 and AB 32. We assist with NEPA clearance, coordinating directly with Caltrans Local Assistance, also in accordance with the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Effective environmental analysis does not just identify impacts but finds creative solutions to identify and resolve important environmental concerns. This critical part of the environmental and planning process is best integrated into the initial stages of project development. By encouraging involvement early in the project planning process, we can provide input to our clients that can avoid and minimize environmental effects and facilitate the environmental and entitlement process. Kimley-Horn is one of the few firms in California that offers services in environmental review and comprehensive planning and design. Kimley-Horn’s extensive experience and analytical and management approaches result in comprehensive, easily understood, and legally defensible documents. ◢ Equity
For over 55 years, Kimley-Horn has sought to develop, improve, and reinvent novel solutions related to transportation, technology, and transit. As we have grown over the years, we also have changed— and we recognize now, more than ever, that we are at a precipice for exciting, necessary change. In our community, we both foster and seek out versatility, diversity, and challenging perspectives.

There is a growing emphasis on equity in communities around the country. Each community may approach transportation equity—or the shared and just distribution of benefits and burdens—differently EXHIBIT "A" - 6 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 5
when planning for and investing in transportation infrastructure and services. Defining what “equity” means to a community up front is important for any community so that partners have a common working definition and target for achieving success. One of the first steps we take on our projects is to work with an advisory group to develop a working
definition and
framework of intent to
articulate what how an
equity lens will be
applied to the delivery of
transportation projects.

The framework
foundation aligns with a
project’s purpose and
serve as a guidepost
during the project or
study process.

Kimley-Horn is
committed to helping
the City of Palmdale
advance equity by
conducting inclusive community engagement, setting goals and policies that emphasize the shared and just distribution of system outcomes, and using equity in performance measurement. Our team is composed of equity practitioners who have experience in regional planning, infrastructure, transportation, micro-mobility, community development, community engagement, and more. We come to this work humbly, as people with diverse identities, backgrounds, and lived experiences, and we bring our unyielding commitments to the City’s goal of focusing on a better and more equitable Bay. We have assembled a team experienced in equity analysis, strategic consulting, and federal compliance with industry standards for payment collection.
◢ Grant Applications
Kimley-Horn has extensive, recent experience with grant funding preparation and management. We have been involved in all steps of the grant process, having worked with agencies to develop applications; get applications approved; work through authorization by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and state DOTs (including Caltrans); and take projects all the way through to successful completion in line with federal guidelines. Additionally, Kimley-Horn has been integrally involved in obtaining over $100 million in state and federal funds from sources including the prop 1B Infrastructure Bond, FHWA ITS Integration Grant Program, and others. In addition, we are extremely familiar with Caltrans’ Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) having worked on a variety of projects and funding sources. We have assisted our local agency clients at various stages.

We have taken projects from initial grant application through final project close out with Caltrans Local Assistance. Thus, we know what forms are required at the various stages through preliminary engineering, construction authorization, and the requirements for project close out.
◢ Connected Vehicles and Advanced Technologies
Kimley-Horn has been fortunate to serve as a trusted advisor on connected vehicle and autonomous vehicle (CV/AV) technologies to national entities including FHWA, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). As a result of these experiences, Kimley-Horn is on the leading edge of developments in the advancement of CVs and AVs from both a technical and policy development perspective.

OVERVIEW OF SUBCONSULTANT
FIRMS
LSY Enterprise – Advisor
LSY Enterprise, Inc. is a boutique consulting firm
that provides comprehensive and vision-driven
municipal services informed by decades of
professional private and public experience. LSY Enterprise is prepared to assist municipalities in the various areas of traffic engineering, land development (private development/entitlement), and field services.

Founder Andrew Yi, P .E., T.E. brings over 35 years of knowledge in municipal and private civil and transportation engineering. After serving 17 years as the City Traffic Engineer/Assistant City Engineer at the City of Santa Clarita, Andrew went on to help other cities strategize, develop, and implement their own traffic plans, programs, and policies.

He brings a unique perceptiveness to the management of sensitive issues and projects that involve multiple stakeholders, including public officials, private citizens, special interest groups, and developers. He and LSY Enterprise embrace modern engineering principles and practices to proactively identify issues while applying a systematic approach to problem-solving.

LSY Enterprise has partnered with public agencies in the Antelope Valley region, including the cities of Palmdale and Lancaster, for the past four years on various transportation engineering and planning projects, including traffic and feasibility studies.

LSY Enterprise has helped develop safety programs through the LRSP and SSARP , conduct Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS), assess and develop Traffic Management Centers (TMC), and assist with design and implementation of major capital improvement projects.

Arellano Associates (DBE) –
Public Outreach
Established in 1994, Arellano Associates (AA)
is a consulting firm specializing in
communications and public outreach, community
and government relations, and strategic planning and marketing programs. AA has been working for more than two decades to deliver marketing and community outreach programs for some of Southern California’s most important transportation, public safety, sustainability, planning, and infrastructure improvement projects. Their vision is to positively impact their communities through honest and
creative engagement using innovative communication tools and techniques. Their team of professionals provides comprehensive communications and planning services for the full spectrum of public Vicus Planning president and principal
Monica Villalobos has over 15 years of
experience focused on addressing equity
and developing innovate approaches and
replicable processes for an evaluation of
equity considerations. Prior to establishing
Vicus, Monica worked for over a decade
on planning projects across California,
focused on sustainability, environmental
justice, equity, and innovation. She has
also previously served as Executive
Director of the Transportation and Land
Use Collaborative, a non-profit focused on
engaging minority rich communities in the
planning process.

EXHIBIT "A" - 7 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 6
projects from planning to construction or implementation. AA also offers specialized professional services geared toward Latino and Spanish-speaking communities. AA is a Limited Liability Corporation and is woman and minority owned, and is a certified Small Business- owned (SBE) and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE). AA operates out of a single office in the City of Chino Hills and is comprised of a team of 56 staff members.

AA has a depth of experience working with the City of Palmdale and its stakeholders. Through projects such as the City of Palmdale’s General Plan Update, High-Speed Rail Station Area Plan, and Comprehensive Zoning Code Update as well as the Southern California Association of Government’s Palmdale Avenue Q Complete Streets Project, AA has become well acquainted with City staff, key stakeholders and the community-at-large. AA understands current issues and efforts underway to improve transportation, safety, sustainability, accessible housing, and mobility throughout the City.

Vicus Planning (DBE) – Multimodal
Strategies (Equity)
Vicus specializes in Planning, Design, and
Environmental consulting services. They offer their
clients integrated services at every stage of the
project delivery process from early planning and analysis to environmental clearance, design and construction. Vicus is a female-led and minority-owned and operated company, with SBE/ DBE certification. A summary of core services include:
 Planning: Transportation Corridor Planning, Transit Oriented Communities (TOC), Equity Analysis, Station Area Planning, First/ Last Mile,Community + Stakeholder Engagement
 Design: Geographic Information System (GIS)
Mapping, Urban Design
 Environment: Environmental Documentation (NEPA/CEQA), Mitigation Monitoring

OVERALL PROJECT

MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
Team Organization
When you choose a consultant, you are choosing the people who offer you the technical expertise, hands-on experience with similar projects, and commitment to a high standard of quality and client service that will make your projects as successful as you have envisioned. We have carefully considered the composition of our team.

The organization chart below highlights the responsibilities of our proposed team members. Darryl dePencier, AICP , GISP , RSP2B will be the project manager and the primary contact for the City of Palmdale, providing overall management and coordination for Kimley-Horn’s services. Our staff identified in the organizational chart below will be committed to this project for its entire duration.

On the subsequent pages, you will find detailed descriptions of our subconsultants followed by resumes for key personnel demonstrating their project qualifications and relevant experience.

Principal-in-Charge & QC/QA
Jean Fares, P .E.

Project Manager
Darryl dePencier, AICP , GISP , RSP2B
Advisor
Andrew Yi 1
VMT
VMT Programs/Banking
Mike Schmitt, AICP CTP , PTP , RSP1*
VMT Tools
Mehul Champaneri
Data Analysis
Chris Gregerson, P .E., T.E., PTOE, PTP
Sustainable Transportation
Frederik Venter, P .E.

Housing
Dave Barquist, AICP
Multimodal Strategies
Equity
Monica Villalobos 3
Program Implementation/Funding
Alyssa Phaneuf, P .E.

Modal Technology
Melissa Hewitt, P .E.

Transit Integration
Greg Kyle, AICP
Bike/Ped Integration
Amy Jackson P .E. (MD), PTOE
Traffic Integration
Sri Chakravarthy, P .E., T.E.

Urban Design
Bhanuja Damarla 3
Safety
Driver Behavior
Darryl dePencier AICP , GISP , RSP2B*
Data Analysis
Kyle McGowan, AICP
Bike/Ped
Amy Jackson, P .E. (MD), PTOE
Traffic
Sowmya Chandreshekar, P .E., T.E., PTOE
CPTED
James Leal
Equity
Corrie Parrish 3
Public Outreach
Jessica Harleaux 2
Chester Britt 2
Kyle Santiago 2
Dave Barquist, AICP
Bold* = Key Team Members
Subconsultants:

1. LSY Enterprise

2. Arellano Associates – DBE

3. Vicus Planning – DBE
EXHIBIT "A" - 8 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 7

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

PROCEDURES
Project Management
Kimley-Horn has developed a list of project management
fundamentals that Darryl and his task order managers will follow during the course of this on-call contract:
 Develop a clear understanding of the project objectives and client needs
 Develop a comprehensive Work Plan and schedule to
accomplish objectives
 Assign a project engineer for every project to assist the project manager
 Set weekly milestones that support the larger milestones  Review milestones with the project team on a weekly basis  Involve stakeholders as integral members of the team
 Coordinate with other consultants
 Create an atmosphere that encourages clear
communications and teamwork
By following the fundamentals above as well as our aforementioned QC/QA process described below, we will deliver a high-quality product that will exceed the City’s expectations.

Quality Control/Quality Assurance
(QC/QA)
Kimley-Horn has developed a solid project management methodology founded upon our commitment to high-quality deliverables. We see ourselves as an extension of your staff and place tremendous emphasis on developing and maintaining clear, continuous communication throughout a project to maintain high standards of quality from inception of a task through completion. For this contract, Jean Fares, P .E. will serve as our QC/QA manager and will leverage his 30+ years of experience delivering public works projects to provide quality assurance. He will work with the project team programmatically to help ensure adherence to the City’s preferred design, reporting, and communication standards.

Kimley-Horn has developed a QC/QA manual that every project manager is required to know and use. The objective of our QC/QA program is to produce deliverables that conform to your scope and minimize the number of errors and omissions. Our QC/QA program is based on the following philosophy:

KIMLEY-HORN

QUALITY CONTROL IS

ACHIEVED
Through adequate planning,
coordination, supervision and
technical direction

CONTROLLED
By assigning a manager to
evaluate all work flow
and procedures

VERIFIED
Through independent reviews
by qualified staff

SECURED
Through careful surveillance of
work activities by parties not
involved in the initial efforts
Quality control measures are put in place to control not only the quality of deliverables but also the quality of the process and communication with you. Our contract managers assign professionals who are not otherwise associated with the project to serve as quality control reviewers and provide detailed project checks from a neutral perspective. Together, our QC/QA managers and contract manager will plan a carefully structured scope of services, corresponding schedule, and accurately developed budget as well as determine appropriate stages at which quality reviews should occur. We simply don’t begin an assignment until these elements are in place and mutually agreed upon. This saves you time and money by making sure the job is done right the first time; ask our clients about our quality performance on past projects.By following the fundamentals above as well as our aforementioned QC/QA process described below, we will deliver a high-quality product that will exceed the City’s expectations.

Staff Turnover
While we have a proven ability to retain and grow our Kimley-Horn professionals, there have been occasions when turnover has occurred in key positions within our and our clients’ project team. Vacations, meeting conflicts, promotions, and staff turnover are a reality of our professional environment. To deliver the depth of professional services required for this project, we have identified and allocated a team of staff members for each task. We believe that clear, succinct, written communication of all decisions along with the depth of our staff will help mitigate the impact of any potential turnover.

EXHIBIT "A" - 9 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 8
DBE Participation
DB utilization as part of our contracts is a matter of corporate philosophy at Kimley-Horn. In all cases, we have sought to involve our DBE subconsultants in meaningful roles. Moreover, when clients have established specific goals for DBE involvement, we have met or exceeded them. For the City of Palmdale’s Sustainability Transportation Plan project, Kimley-Horn has made ample good faith efforts to attempt to meet the 20% DBE goal for this project.

Within the proposed contract value, Kimley-Horn has committed to partnering with Arellano Associates and Vicus Planning for a minimum of 20% of the contract.

Kimley-Horn is committed to working with the City to identify other DBE partners who can support the successful completion of the Sustainability Transportation Plan.

Project Team – Key Personnel
Resumes of key personnel, including previously completed projects with components similar to this project, are provided in the following pages.

Availability
TEAM MEMBER ROLE COMMITMENT TO OTHER WORKLOAD % AVAILABILITY Darryl dePencier, AICP , GISP , RSP2B
Project Manager; Safety
April/May/June 2022 60% 40%
July/August/September 2022 60% 40%
October/November/December 2022 65% 35%
January/February 2023 65% 35%
Jean Fares, P .E.

Principal-in-Charge and QC/QA
April/May/June 2022 70% 30%
July/August/September 2022 70% 30%
October/November/December 2022 60% 40%
January/February 2023 60% 40%
Mike Schmitt, AICP CTP , PTP , RSP1
VMT
April/May/June 2022 65% 35%
July/August/September 2022 65% 35%
October/November/December 2022 60% 40%
January/February 2023 60% 40%
Monica Villalobos, Ph.D.

Equity Lead
April/May/June 2022 60% 40%
July/August/September 2022 50% 50%
October/November/December 2022 50% 50%
January/February 2023 30% 70%
Andrew Yi, P .E., T.E.

Advisor
April/May/June 2022 75% 25%
July/August/September 2022 75% 25%
October/November/December 2022 75% 25%
January/February 2023 75% 25%
Jessica Harleaux
Public Outreach
April/May/June 60% 40%
July/August/September 60% 40%
October/November/December 60% 40%
January/February 60% 40%
EXHIBIT "A" - 10 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 9
Professional
Credentials
• M.S., Urban Spatial Analysis,
University of Pennsylvania
• B.S., Geography, Carleton
University, Ottawa
• Certificate, Geographic
Information Systems,
Algonquin College
• American Institute of
Certified Planners #026552
• Geographic
Information Systems
Professional #59317
• Road Safety
Professional 1 #273
• Road Safety
Professional 2B #17
Darryl has been conducting transportation safety for more than 15 years. He has developed tools to root out the spatial relationships between crash events to determine the factors and conditions that increase the probability of vehicle crashes. His experience ranges from establishing safety policy language to network screening, crash site engineering reviews, and developing countermeasure toolboxes. Darryl also conducts statistical analyses of crash activity using methods presented in the Highway Safety Manual, the Local Roadway Safety Manual, and customized analyses for unusual locations or conditions.

He has worked on studies at the statewide, regional, local, and site-specific levels that include guidance documents, LRSPs, safety thresholds and audits, and local countermeasure recommendations.

Relevant Experience
 City of Artesia, LRSP , Artesia, CA – Project Manager  City of Santa Clarita, SSAR, Santa Clarita, CA – Project Planner  City of Anaheim, LRSP , Anaheim, CA – Project Planner  City of Eastvale, SSAR Eastvale, CA – Project Manager  City of Perris, LRSP , Perris, CA – Project Manager
 City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the SSAR/LRSP , Goleta, CA – Project Planner  Caltrans, Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Implementation, Statewide, CA – Project Planner  Caltrans, Safety Performance Measure Target Setting Analysis, Statewide, CA – Project Planner Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP2B
Project Manager; Safety
Professional
Credentials
• Bachelor of Science,
Architecture, California
State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
• Professional Engineer
in California #TR2097Jean has more than 30 years of professional experience in the fields of traffic and transportation engineering, including systematic safety analysis, traffic signal design, signal system design, traffic signal timing, traffic operations, signing and marking plans preparation, and traffic control plans. In addition to signal design and corridor signal operations, Jean has extensive experience with ITS technologies.

Relevant Experience
 City of Palmdale, On-Call Signal Design Services, Palmdale, CA – Project Manager  City of Santa Clarita, SSAR, Santa Clarita, CA – Project Manager  City of Santa Clarita, LRSP , Santa Clarita, CA – Project Manager  City of Perris, LRSP , Perris, CA – QC/QA Manager
 City of Palm Desert, LRSP , Palm Desert, CA – Project Manager  City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the SSARP/LRSP , Goleta, CA – QC/QA Manager  County of Ventura, LRSP , Ventura County, CA – Principal-in-Charge  City of Ventura, SSAR, Ventura, CA – Project Engineer  County of Imperial, SSAR for Varied Roadways, Imperial County, CA – Project Manager Jean Fares, P.E.

Principal-in-Charge
EXHIBIT "A" - 11 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 10
Professional
Credentials
• Master of Science, Planning,
Tucson, University of Arizona
• Bachelor of Science,
Regional Development,
University of Arizona,
• American Institute of
Certified Planners #106984
• AICP Certified Transportation
Planner (AICP CTP)
• Professional Transportation
Planner #220
• Road Safety
Professional1 #185
• American Planning
Association (APA), Member
• Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Member
Mike has more than 25 years of experience and is recognized by both the American Planning Association (APA) and the Transportation Professional Certification Board (TPCB) as an expert in transportation planning. He has worked on a wide variety of multimodal transportation projects including those with a significant focus on VMT in support of SB 743 analysis requirements. This expertise builds on his extensive travel demand modeling and trip generation expertise. He has authored National Academies research on trip generation and presented VMT/SB 743 materials to multiple professional groups including the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) and the Association of Environmental Planners (AEP). He is currently responsible for developing SB 743 thresholds and policies for multiple northern and southern California jurisdictions. In addition, he has completed multiple complex VMT/SB 743 analyses for clients throughout California covering a broad range of land use types.

Relevant Experience
 County of Riverside, SB 743 Implementation Plan, Riverside, CA – Project Manager  City of El Segundo SB 743 Implementation Plan, El Segundo, CA – Project Manager  City of Westlake Village, SB 743 Implementation Plan, Westlake Village, CA – Project Manager  City of Salinas, SB 743 Implementation and VMT Banking Program, Salinas, CA – Project Planner  Santa Cruz County/City of Capitola/City of Santa Cruz/City of Watsonville/City of Scott’s Valley SB 743 Implementation Plan, Santa Cruz County, CA – Project Manager
Mike Schmitt, AICP CTP, PTP, RSP1
VMT
Professional
Credentials
• Bachelor of Science in
Applied Mathematics,
California State
University, Northridge
• Professional Engineer in
Traffic Engineering #TR1850
• Professional Engineer in Civil
Engineering #C64437
• Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
• Intelligent Transportation
Society (ITS) of California
• American Public Works
Association (APWA),
High Desert Region
• City and County Engineers
Association (County
of Los Angeles)
• City Traffic
Engineers Association
Andrew has more than 35 years of experience in municipal and private civil and transportation engineering, more than 26 years which was spent serving the City of Santa Clarita. He has in- depth knowledge of managing sensitive issues and projects that involve public officials, private citizens, special interest groups, and private developers. Andrew also embraces modern engineering principles to identify problems and solve them systematically. As the City of Santa Clarita’s City Traffic Engineer/Assistant City Engineer for 17 years, Andrew was responsible for traffic operation and safety, transportation planning, circulation, and funding. In addition, he supervised several private development entitlement processes and implementation. Andrew’s accomplishments include the following: developing a citywide systemic safety program, ITS system, and developing and implementing a non-motorized plan and capital projects such as road/intersections, roundabout, traffic signal system, bicycle, and pedestrian improvement projects.

Relevant Experience
 City of Palmdale, Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS) Study, Palmdale, CA – Project Manager
 Cities of Lancaster, Santa Clarita, and Oxnard, Various Traffic Safety Studies, Various Cities, CA – Peer Reviewer
 City of Santa Clarita, Non-Motorized Transportation Plan, Santa Clarita, CA – Project Manager  Cities of Oxnard and Santa Clarita, Safe Route to School, Santa Clarita and Oxnard, CA – Project Manager Andrew Yi, P.E., T.E.

Advisor
EXHIBIT "A" - 12 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 11
Professional
Credentials
• Master of Arts, Planning,
University Southern California
• Bachelor of Arts, Psychology,
University of Baltimore
• APA - Membership &
Inclusion Committee -
SFV Regional Rep
• International Association of
Public Participation, Member
Jessica serves as a Project Manager for Arellano Associates. In this capacity, she is responsible for outreach coordination, project planning and developing and executing public engagement plans for transportation related projects. She has a diverse background focused on public policy, civic engagement, and community development in international and domestic settings, working alongside both small jurisdictions and regional agencies. She has assisted multiple agencies develop Community Based Organization (CBO) partnership programs and specializes in cultivating strategic partnerships.

Jessica has worked closely with Arellano Associates team members over the last few years while serving as an associate for a local planning, design, and environmental services firm where she specialized in policy writing, community engagement, and strategic community partnerships. Jessica has a strong interest in community empowerment, social justice and equity applications, environmental justice issues, and has worked for a variety of clients in Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura counties.

Relevant Experience
 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Housing Leadership Academy, Southern California – Project Manager  Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor (WSAB) Project Community Participation Program, Los Angeles, CA – Project Manager  Metro, Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 (Alternative Analysis/Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report/Advanced Conceptual Engineering Phase), Los Angeles, CA – Project Manager  Metro, I-405 Sepulveda Pass ExpressLanes Community Engagement Program, Los Angeles, CA – Senior Project Coordinator Jessica Harleaux
Public Outreach
Professional
Credentials
• Ph.D. (ABD) City
and Regional
Planning, UC Berkeley
• Master of Regional Planning,
City and Regional Planning,
Cornell University
• Bachelor of Science,
Community and Regional
Development, University of
California, Davis
Monica’s unique experience includes work at the intersection of transportation-oriented community planning, land use, environmental justice and award-winning community engagement strategies. With 20 years of experience across California, she has a proven record as a technical expert and public engagement strategist on a variety of large-scale multidisciplinary transportation planning and policy projects. Monica has extensive experience in transit-oriented community development. Locally she has led station area planning on several Metro projects including the Regional Connector, Purple Line Extension, Eastside Phase 2, Green Line Extension, and Crenshaw North; led equity assessments in San Diego for SANDAG and Caltrans and has conducted outreach for SCAG across Southern California. She has worked closely with key decision makers, community groups, stakeholders, elected officials, and the public.

Relevant Experience
 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), Traffic Reduction Study (TRS), Los Angeles, CA – Equity Task Lead
 LACMTA, Metro C Line Extension to Torrance, Los Angeles, CA – Community Integration Task Lead  LACMTA, Metro Crenshaw-North Extension-Draft EIR/ACE, Los Angeles, CA – Urban Design/TOC Task Lead  San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), SR 78 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan (CMCP), Southern CA – Equity Task Lead
Monica Villalobos, Ph.D.

Multimodal Strategies
EXHIBIT "A" - 13 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 12

2. OBJECTIVES, TASKS, AND DELIVERABLES

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Palmdale is preparing a Sustainable Transportation Plan with core goals of improving traffic safety and achieving sustainable VMT reductions through updates to the transportation system and local development processes. The plan will involve a robust engagement effort both targeting local leaders that represent diverse interests and focus areas as well as the general public. The Kimley- Horn team has outlined an approach that will achieve each of these objectives in an engaging way that will lead directly to implementation and a long-term program of improvements. The focus on safety will take the approach of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). The LRSP process is driven by data and stakeholder input to identify challenge areas that the City can focus on to have the greatest impact in reducing traffic injuries. The plan will consider physical roadway characteristics, driver behaviors, enforcement strategies, educational initiatives, and City policies, procedures, and programs, and have the necessary components to allow the City to qualify for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and other safety related grant funding.

The VMT analysis will use Travel Demand inputs validated with actual big data observations of City traffic patterns to identify citywide VMT.

It will also identify local VMT characteristics for sub-areas within the City to help plan for housing and development strategies that will balance the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) needs with VMT reduction goals.

ROADWAY SAFETY ANALYSIS AND

COUNTERMEASURES
The City of Palmdale is taking a major step towards enhanced roadway safety through the safety component of the Sustainable Transportation Plan. This plan will help the City identify the factors that contribute most to local traffic collisions and will better position the City for safety funding from state and federal grant programs.

Kimley-Horn has extensive experience with the California HSIP including the development of the HSIP Implementation Plan at the statewide level, and recently over $30M in successful HSIP grants in Cycle 10. The goal of the plan is to develop countermeasures that can be systemically implemented to reduce the risk of collisions on City streets. Kimley-Horn’s approach builds that toolbox using three separate processes.

1. Identify citywide emphasis areas such as impaired driving or active transportation that represent a large proportion of traffic injuries

2. Identify site specific case studies that are representative of other locations in the City for a more detailed audit and focused countermeasures

3. A review of citywide policies, programs, resources and practices that may have an impact on traffic safety, and then the identification of opportunities to align with safety best practices This study is important because in addition to the trauma of injury and loss of life, economic losses in the City of Palmdale due to traffic injuries on City streets were over $750M from 2015 through 2020 according to UC Berkeley’s Traffic Injury Mapping System (TIMS) and Caltrans HSIP Cost Parameters. The Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) most recently ranked Palmdale 14 of 59 peer cities in 2019 for traffic injuries after normalizing for population and VMT which suggests that the City has more than its fair share of traffic injuries. The OTS ranking for several categories is listed in Table 1. Impaired driving were the categories that the City ranked lowest followed by speed related and night time crashes.

Table 1 - Office of Traffic Safety Rankings (2019)
Year County Group
2019 LOS ANGELES

COUNTY B

TYPE OF CRASH VICTIMS KILLED
& INJURED
OTS

RANKING
Total Fatal and Injury 912 14/59
Alcohol Involved 91 24/59
Had Been Drinking
Driver < 21 5 6/59
Had Been Drinking
Driver 21 – 34 8 49/59
Motorcycles 16 49/59
Pedestrians 31 45/59
Pedestrians < 15 4 36/59
Pedestrians 65+ 5 34/59
Bicyclists 13 53/59
Bicyclists < 15 0 58/59
Composite 338 28/59

TYPE OF CRASH FATAL & INJURY

CRASHES
OTS

RANKING
Speed Related 119 32/59
Nighttime
(9:00pm – 2:59am) 66 32/59
Hit and Run 49 30/59
Kimley-Horn is the lead consultant supporting Caltrans’ Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and current HSIP Implementation Plan.

The SHSP outlines statewide priorities and emphasis areas that wWhen comparing fatalities and serious injuries over the last ten 10 years against statewide trends for SHSP challenge areas, Palmdale crashes more often involved intersections, impaired driving, and young drivers. Table 2 shows the statewide fatal & and severe injury collisions in a comparison to data from the City of Palmdale.

EXHIBIT "A" - 14 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 13
Figure 1 and Table 7 show the concentration of injury crashes in Palmdale and highlights the 10 most economically impactful intersections in the City.

Figure 1: Injury Crashes and 10 Most Economically Impactful Intersection Table 2 - Fatal & Severe Injuries - Statewide vs. Palmdale Challenge Areas
Statewide Palmdale
% of F+SI Collisions
(2015-2018)
F+SI Colllisions
(2015-2018)
% of F+SI Collisions
(2015-2018) % Point Difference
Intersections 23.6% 226 51.1% 27.5%
Impaired Driving 25.3% 138 31.2% 6.0%
Young Drivers 13.1% 71 16.1% 3.0%
Pedestrians 19.2% 88 19.9% 0.7%
Distracted Driving 5.0% 23 5.2% 0.2%
Work Zones 1.4% 7 1.6% 0.1%
Commercial Vehicles 6.4% 26 5.9% -0.5%
Aggressive Driving 33.1% 141 31.9% -1.2%
Occupant Protection 14.2% 56 12.7% -1.5%
Aging Drivers 12.4% 41 9.3% -3.1%
Bicyclists 8.3% 20 4.5% -3.8%
Motorcyclists 21.0% 73 16.5% -4.5%
Lane Departure 43.3% 153 34.6% -8.6%
Driver Licensing** 24.2%** 34** 2.3%** -24.2%
** Data comes from FARS, only fatal crashes are included EXHIBIT "A" - 15 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 14
The Sustainable Transportation Plan will identify the factors associated with the most vehicle crashes particular to the City and will identify matching countermeasures to reduce or eliminate those crashes. The map below shows where traffic injuries were most concentrated in Palmdale.

Our team uses custom GIS based tools to evaluate the roadway system and intersections using Highway Safety Manual statistical methods. This allows for independent evaluation of intersections by control type, and roadways by function. Our team then applies additional statistics to rate each location for crash severity, crash type patterns, driver behavior factors, and roadway conditions. Our analysis procedures are outlined in the exhibit below.

Kimley-Horn works closely with Crossroads allowing us to seamlessly input their data outputs of the most recent available crash data. Our custom in-house software can process the Crossroads crash records to provide a ranked order of intersections and roadway segments by crash activity consistent with the Local Roadway Safety Manual, provide a statistical evaluation of crash rates for each location relative to citywide norms, and highlight locations with unusually high crash severities or crash patterns that can help diagnose safety challenges.

Kimley-Horn’s approach to safety plan development centers on the creation of a countermeasure toolbox that includes items that address both infrastructure and driver behavior. A combination of crash history, roadway characteristics, and stakeholder feedback is used to determine which countermeasures that will be most likely to have the most safety benefit relative to cost for the City. The toolbox is then used to produce three products as part of the LRSP .

1. Citywide Systemic Infrastructure Projects: Serious injury crashes in Palmdale are more likely to be intersection related than in other parts of California. The LRSP would likely include a number of low cost systemic countermeasures such as retroreflective backplates, signal timing, high visibility crosswalks, and other measures that increase the visibility and awareness of the intersection for drivers and other users.

2. Local Infrastructure Projects: For example, the intersection of Scott Road and Tucker Court has had the most costly injury count between 2015 and 2019 according to the TIMS dataset. Despite a relatively low number of crashes, the ones that have occurred have resulted in serious injuries. This intersection is side street stop controlled and Scott Road has a speed limit of 50 MPH.

Visibility to the east of the intersection is impeded by a downgrade that may cause some drivers to mis-judge the clearance they have to enter traffic. There is no overhead street lighting at this location either. The LRSP may explore opportunities to add a limit line for vehicles approaching Scott Road, warning signs for Scott Road traffic, and potentially, an intersection beacon.

3. Non-Infrastructure Projects: Serious injury and fatal crashes in Palmdale are more commonly associated with impaired
drivers. The LRSP could explore opportunities to improve collaboration between law enforcement and drivers education programs, high visibility enforcement campaigns, and sober ride home programming.

The following scope of services outlines how Kimley-Horn will build off of the City’s current plans to provide a well-rounded framework for an ongoing safety improvement program. The LRSP will be structured to make the City more competitive for grant funding, better able to identify and prioritize safety needs, and encourage safer driving practices of its residents.

VMT EVALUATION AND

REDUCTION STRATEGY
With the introduction of SB 743, the assessment of a project’s impact to the transportation system under CEQA has changed from Level of Service (LOS), a qualitative measure of driver comfort based on delay or congestion, to VMT, a proxy for GHG and sustainability. As intended by the California state legislature, this change is resulting in a fundamental shift in CEQA findings as the change favors developing in more urbanized areas. While more urbanized areas have typically been more challenging from an LOS standpoint given limited right- of-way (ROW), the higher land use density and greater land use mix often results in shorter vehicle trips and lower VMT. In contrast, in suburban and rural areas, a VMT analysis more often results in a finding of a transportation impact due to more homogenous land use mixes and less dense development. With less transportation options as compared to more urbanized areas, mitigating impacts in suburban Table 7 - 10 Most Economically Impactful Intersections
No. Intersection Total Fatal Serious Moderate Minor Cost 1 Pearblossom Highway Barrel Springs Road 37 2 3 12 20 $14,275,600 2 Avenue P Sierra Highway 32 1 3 5 23 $11,332,200
3 Avenue M 20th Street East 29 0 3 3 23 $8,857,600
4 Technology Drive 10th Street West 39 1 1 9 28 $7,925,900 5 Avenue M 30th Street East 16 1 2 4 9 $7,867,300
6 Pearblossom Highway Fort Tejon Road 27 1 1 8 17 $6,893,700 7 Palmdale Boulevard 30th Street East 26 1 1 4 20 $6,567,200 8 Palmdale Boulevard 20th Street East 21 0 2 3 16 $6,101,300 9 Pearblossom Highway 40th Street East 16 1 1 5 9 $5,819,600 10 Avenue R 45th Street East 16 1 1 5 9 $5,819,600
EXHIBIT "A" - 16 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 15
and rural areas is proving to be more difficult than under LOS. For many jurisdictions, SB 743 is resulting in a reversal in the results of transportation significant findings as compared to before the bill.

As a practical matter, for many jurisdictions SB 743 is also a more restrictive approach to identifying transportation impacts because of the basis for setting an impact threshold. In terms of the threshold of significance, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research’s (OPR) recommends that projects consisting of residential or general employment category land uses effectively need to be located in an area where they are 15 percent (Los Angeles County recommends

16.8% based on the current GHG reduction targets set for their RTP by CARB1) less than the average VMT2 for similar uses. Effectively, this means that new projects must be located in an area where they are more efficient than 65 percent of similar uses from a VMT standpoint.

Given that much of the development still planned is not infill, this is resulting in an increasing need for feasible mitigation solutions if a “statement of overriding considerations” is to be avoided.

To date, VMT mitigation across most of the state have relied heavily on Transportation Demand Measures (TDMs) as a primary source of mitigation. These measures generally represent two basic types:
infrastructure and policy. The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) guide for Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, which was just recently updated and rereleased in January 2022, is one of the primary sources for estimating mitigation effects in California. Although this resource is invaluable, it is still challenged by the limitations of the prior 2010 version given that it provides solutions that work best in highly urbanized areas, with TDM applications in suburban and rural contexts often having limited or questionable efficacy. TDMs can also be challenging from the standpoint of mitigation monitoring and are often unpopular with project applicants because they may need to be managed and paid for in perpetuity. These limitations have led jurisdictions to increasingly consider programmatic approaches, in addition to TDMs, for VMT mitigation.

Programmatic approaches that rely on collectively funding projects appear to hold great promise for VMT mitigation as they can allow a project to obtain an amount of mitigation precisely commensurate with their impact. In addition, these programmatic approaches allow developers to make a single payment, avoid the complexity of ongoing TDM management, and do not require mitigation monitoring by the project applicant. Potential programmatic approaches include:

VMT Banking – Under a VMT Banking framework, multiple VMT reducing projects are grouped together and their associated VMT reductions are monetized in the form of credits. These credits are then purchased for the purposes of mitigating VMT in excess of determined impact thresholds. The underlying projects may be either regionally or locally beneficial to the area in which the project is located.

VMT Exchanges – VMT Exchanges are similar to VMT Banking with the exception that they deal with a single VMT-reducing project that can be established by the project applicant, other entity, or potentially be selected from a VMT Banking list. As this approach eliminates the need to convert a group of projects into equivalent VMT reducing credits, its administration could potentially be simplified, and funding can be directed at a single preferred mitigation solution which may be of greater benefit to the project than alternatively funding a VMT Bank.

VMT Mitigation Impact Fee Programs – Some jurisdictions have also considered the creation or conversion of an existing Transportation Impact Mitigation (TIM) Fee Program to serve the purpose of VMT mitigation. This, however, can be complicated for most jurisdictions given that, to not be counterproductive in terms of VMT mitigation, all capacity-enhancing projects would need to be purged from the TIM Fee Program. Simply, a TIM Fee Program cannot have roadway widening projects and be VMT mitigating at the same time. While a full conversion to VMT mitigation projects is feasible in some urban locations, most jurisdictions still desire to have some level of roadway widening/capacity enhancement within their programs for the purpose of facilitating travel and reducing congestion, even if the approach may be conflicting with SB 743 given that most capacity-enhancing projects result in induced demand and increased VMT. An important difference with a VMT Mitigation Impact Fee Program and a Banking/Exchange program is that every project would participate in it, not just those projects that require VMT mitigation under SB 743.

Programmatic approaches can provide a public benefit in terms of funding transportation improvements that would not otherwise be constructed, resulting in potential improvements to congestion, GHG emissions, increased transportation choices, and additional opportunities for active transportation and related health benefits.

Kimley-Horn is ideally suited to help you consider whether a programmatic approach is the right fit for the City of Palmdale as we have completed similar projects for the Cities of Salinas, Watsonville, and Tracy and are just getting underway with a Countywide assessment for FresnoCOG (in addition to developing SB 743 Mitigation Programs that include Transportation Demand Measures for more than 25 jurisdictions across California).

The graphic on the following page presents our workflow for developing a Fee-Based VMT Mitigation Program that complements TDMs to best meet the City of Palmdale’s needs for VMT mitigation.

This approach emphasizes a process that both addresses the High- Level and Detailed Considerations discussed in the next section as well as providing additional detail in terms of the analysis mechanics.

As presented, it closely follows the tasks in work plan and is intended to outline a road map for the development of a Fee Based VMT Mitigation Program.

The following sections highlight some of the key considerations including establishing the VMT Mitigation Need and Establishing a Framework for Evaluation.
1 California Air Resources Board, 2017 Scoping Plan-Identified VMT Reductions and Relationship to State Goals, January 2019, Figure 3. 2 Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State of California. December 2018 EXHIBIT "A" - 17 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 16
VMT Mitigation Need
The locations of future development, the quantity of development, and the extent of mitigation needs based on individual Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) output are invaluable input into determining the magnitude of VMT mitigation need in the future. This dataset will be invaluable to understanding potential revenue, but also the amount that differing spatial areas may require in mitigation terms. As the project progresses, this data will help evaluate the overall feasibility of program alternatives as costs of mitigation are developed and will help guide policy considerations related to whether the definition of “feasible mitigation” under CEQA may need to be addressed by considering a cap on required fees.

Using regional travel demand model and previous VMT work with establishing thresholds, the total potential VMT to be mitigated can be calculated by calculating the difference between the VMT per capita and VMT per employee for each TAZ that is over the established thresholds. The difference can then be multiplied by the population and total employees for each TAZ to develop a total VMT per TAZ to be mitigated, which then allows for a countywide total to be calculated. The following table shows an estimate of the amount of VMT that will need to be mitigated through 2040 (if all projects were to avoid an overriding consideration or a lesser “feasible mitigation” option is not considered). The following graphics show the distribution of VMT mitigation need across the City of Palmdale and all future growths VMT above the threshold were to be mitigated.
2040 Daily VMT Summary
for Anticipated Growth
Totals
(Considering 16.8%
Threshold)
Future Households under
Threshold 6,699
Future Households over
Threshold 13,905
Future Citywide Total VMT for
VMT/Cap over threshold 925,485
Future Citywide Total VMT 1,176,876
EXHIBIT "A" - 18 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 17
City of Palmdale TAZ – Existing Residential VMT per Capita City of Palmdale TAZ – Future Residential Growth Mitigation Needs

FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING

A FEE-BASED VMT MITIGATION

PROGRAM
When establishing the evaluation criteria, there will be the need to consider numerous important considerations including the following High-Level Considerations and Detailed Considerations:

High-Level Considerations
The following high-level considerations are provided for establishing a basis for developing a framework under which a Fee-Based VMT Mitigation Program can be developed:

1. Targeted Mitigation – A Fee-Based VMT Mitigation Program should only be imposed when a project can’t sufficiently or cost-effectively mitigate its transportation impact. Unlike a typical TIM Fee Program under which nearly every development project may be required to pay into it, VMT Fee-Based Mitigation Programs are anticipated to only collect money from projects that cannot effectively mitigate under their respective significant impact threshold on their own. As a result, forecasting revenue may be more difficult given the need to predict a project location and timing, its land use characteristics, and whether it will require mitigation.

2. Effective – Identified mitigation solutions must be able to provide sufficient mitigation at a reasonable cost. The framework development process needs to achieve a reasonable Return on Investment (ROI) for the program to be feasible, or proposed projects may either not be financially viable or may still require “overriding considerations” to meet CEQA requirements,
diminishing the effectiveness of the overall program. To successfully evaluate effectiveness, the total need for mitigation (location and timing) will be need evaluated as well as the ROI of solutions both in the aggregate and individually.

3. Additionality – Reductions attributed to mitigations must not have otherwise happened had the additional money from a Fee-Based VMT Mitigation Program been collected and
allocated. This consideration applies both from the perspective that VMT reductions are not accounted for in the VMT estimating technique and that this is truly a new mitigation (not just shifting money around).

4. Roughly Proportional – Mitigation must be appropriately sized to offset the actual impact. As a practical matter, this translates to the need for VMT Fee-Based Mitigation Programs to be defined in terms of “vehicle miles” or similar units, such that the appropriate level of mitigation can be secured by a project. Under an approach where the VMT reductions are determined in terms of “vehicle miles” or similar units, an amount of mitigation commensurate with the impact can be purchased.

5. Legal – Local and other jurisdictional legal frameworks need to be carefully vetted for the creation of a VMT Fee-Based Mitigation EXHIBIT "A" - 19 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 18
Program that does not violate existing laws. As part of this, careful evaluation of AB 1600 implications should be completed. The following legal requirements will be important considerations when establishing VMT frameworks for evaluation:
 California Environmental Quality Act requirements including establishment of an “essential nexus” between the mitigation fee and government interest.
 California Mitigation Fee Act stipulations on establishing the “purpose and use” of the mitigation fee.
 Congestion Management Plan and local General Plan
requirements to improve traffic flow and mitigate reduced Levels of Service.

6. Equity – Programs need to be carefully vetted to avoid the potential for disproportionate impacts to low-income and minority communities. Benefits of Fee-Based VMT Mitigation Programs should also be distributed equitably.

7. Unintended Consequences – Given the relative newness of these programmatic approaches, the potential for unintended consequences exists. Care needs to be given to avoiding program designs that disincentivize good public policy or that don’t find an appropriate balance between efficient VMT mitigation in terms of return on investment and community values. The matrix on the following page summarizes these seven high level considerations for a Fee-Based VMT Mitigation Program.

TredLite
Kimley-Horn has recently released its next
generation VMT analysis tool, TREDLite
which builds on our experience of implementing VMT analysis tools for more than 20 jurisdictions across the State. This version of our tool can analyze VMT and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) at the project level in addition to having the following features:
 Online Tool with GIS based Mapping
 The ability to handle multiple land uses at the same time  11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation for 100s of land uses
 NCHRP 684 Internal Capture Analysis for mixed use projects  VMT Threshold Analysis
 GHG and Criteria Pollutant Analysis
 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Evaluation based on 2022 CAPCOA guidance
 VMT Banking Cost and Mitigation Assessments
 Feasible Mitigation Evaluation
All of these features together provide for an exceptional user experience that also results in better outcomes by taking a complete look at a project’s mitigation options.

EXHIBIT "A" - 20 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 19

SCOPE OF WORK

1. Project Launch
Task 1.1: Project Kick-off Meeting
Completed prior to consultant selection.

Task 1.2: Consultant Selection Process
Completed prior to consultant selection.

Task 1.3 Form community Stakeholder
Committee
See task 2.1.

Task 1.4: Identify Existing Conditions
The Kimley-Horn team will analyze existing conditions in the city of Palmdale and present the findings in the form of a technical memorandum complete with necessary maps and graphics. This task will also include preparation of materials needed for Community Workshop #1 (Task 2.4). The existing conditions analysis will include a review of existing and planned land uses, demographic and population information, an evaluation of current transportation patterns and vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and roadway safety performance using the past five years of collision history. ◢ Task 1.4.1: Land Use
Kimley-Horn will acquire existing and planned land use from the City and map them. The team will provide an assessment of how and where the land uses best support sustainable transportation opportunities.
◢ Task 1.4.2: Population and Demographics
The Kimley-Horn team will review existing and forecast population and demographic characteristics in the City using information from the Travel Demand Model, American Community Survey, CalEnviroscreen and other relevant sources to identify areas with higher population densities, concentrations of vulnerable populations, and areas projected for growth.
◢ Task 1.4.3: Travel Patterns and VMT
Kimley-Horn will develop a profile of citywide VMT under existing conditions and will map by Transportation Analysis Zone the VMT associated with individual units of common land uses to aid in VMT forecasting associated with future development proposals. The team will also review mode split, commute characteristics, and trip purpose characteristics using Travel Demand Model, American Community Survey, and Replica data sources.

Kimley-Horn will also review existing City traffic analysis and impact fee processes to determine how to best incorporate VMT into the City development approval process in addition to what is required by CEQA.
◢ Task 1.4.4: Roadway Safety
Kimley-Horn will work with City staff to identify programs and policies within the City that are most supportive of safety, which ones could be updated to better align with current best practices, and where there are opportunities for new initiatives that would likely support safer roads and better driving behaviors. Kimley-Horn staff will collect the needed information by providing the City with a list of questions in advance, and will conduct an interview with City staff to finalize the responses.

Kimley-Horn will perform a comprehensive data analysis review. Our approach to safety analysis includes statistical network screening using Highway Safety Manual Methods. These methods are selected to identify locations with higher than expected collision activity that can be reviewed to identify roadway and intersection characteristics associated with higher risk. These methods also review a variety of collision characteristics to identify locations where specific types of collisions are over-represented. This helps to diagnose safety factors that are leading to elevated numbers of collisions.

The first screening step is to develop critical crash rates for segments and intersections in the City. Average crash rates are developed for intersections based on control type, and roadway segments based on functional classification. A statistical threshold is then established based on daily traffic volumes for each segment and intersection.

The difference between the actual crash rate and the critical crash rate for each location can then be used to estimate the relative risk faced by users of the given intersection or segment. This method builds on the High Collision or High Injury Networks that essentially mirror High Traffic networks to provide deeper insight into potential low-cost safety measures. Roadways and intersections with lower classifications will also be identified, allowing the LRSP to broach risk factors associated with those roadways.

The second screening step focuses on crash type over-
representation. Citywide data is used to determine the typical collision type mix for each of the functional classifications and intersection control types. Then the mixture is reviewed for each segment and intersection to highlight those with high concentrations of a specific collision factor. Factors analyzed would include:
 Fatal Collisions
 Fatal + Serious Injury Collisions
 Broadside Collisions
 Rear-End Collisions
 Sideswipe Collisions
 Head-On Collisions
 Single Vehicle Lane Departures (run off road, fixed object, other)  Bicycle Collisions
 Pedestrian Collisions
 Wet/Slippery Road Collisions
 Nighttime Collisions
 Collisions Involving Alcohol/Drugs
 Collisions Involving Driver Inattention
 Collisions Involving Speeding/Aggressive Driving
The resulting list would include both the number of collisions for each factor, and the probability that any excess is not random.

EXHIBIT "A" - 21 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 20
Kimley-Horn will provide an inventory of sites including all roadway segments and intersections with three or more collisions (needed for statistical evaluation) ranked by overall number of collisions per Local Roadway Safety Manual Guidance. Kimley-Horn will then recommend up to 10 locations for further evaluation and potential project development based on amount of collision activity, collision severity, unusual collision patterns, and site variability to maximize the potential number of systemic factors, and mitigations identified. We will identify potential conflicts between vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles.

Task 1 Deliverables
Â Meeting Agendas and Notes
Â Technical Memorandum: Existing Conditions Report
Â GIS database:
⤷ Land Use and Demographics Maps
⤷ VMT by Land Use by TAZ
⤷ Collision Data
⤷ Intersection/Roadway Safety Profiles
⤷ Demographic Characteristics

2. Public Outreach
Based on lessons learned from the pandemic, our team proposes to make it possible to attend all workshops virtually even if they are held in person due to vastly increased participation when virtual options are available. Our team is equipped with several tools to facilitate remote interaction both in real time and on demand. A project website will be established and maintained throughout the project with the option for the City to continue use and maintenance through future implementation phases and plan updates.

Task 2.1: Comprehensive Stakeholder
Engagement Plan
The Kimley-Horn team will develop a comprehensive Stakeholder Engagement Plan that will describe the outreach strategies and engagement activates needed to support the project. The team will collaborate with the City to develop a plan that addresses key stakeholders and disadvantaged communities in Palmdale. Once approved, the Plan will remain a flexible approach given the changing nature of public health constraints brought on by COVID-19. The team will develop a refined stakeholder engagement plan that includes a stratified list of stakeholders, forums, and the general public so that the project collects a representative sample of informed opinions and perspectives in addition to more generalized input received from the open forums. These outreach activities will include development of a list of organizations and individuals that are likely to provide specific and representative input on project needs. The team will maintain a contact list of key stakeholders and representatives.

The plan will provide additional detail into the format and content of each workshop as well as the format and content of the project website, and listening sessions/focus groups. The plan will address both the incoming and outgoing messaging for the project.

Workshops will be timed and scheduled to be convenient for the most attendees possible.

Task 2.2: Creation of Project Website and
Engagement Components
The Outreach Team will work with the City to develop content and graphics to be used on the project webpage that will serve as the public portal for project information and a resource for all online tools.

It will be the main portal to maintaining a connection to communities and stakeholders and will be used to notify the community on project status and opportunities for input. The webpage will host all collateral materials including presentations or exhibits prepared for community meetings. It is recommended that the webpage also feature interactive digital tools such as surveying or rank polling and a link for visitors to leave comments and be added to the project database for future communication. Arellano Associates (AA) will provide updated webpage content as necessary at various stages of the project and will collaborate with the City and technical consultants to package educational content and outreach materials.

Kimley-Horn will leverage its PublicCoordinate system to allow for interactive mapping and feedback options through the website to complement in-person and other feedback forums.

Task 2.3: Listening Events
To understand the needs and wants of the community, the outreach team will work with the City to launch a Virtual Listening Event during the first community workshop and ending prior to the second workshop. The Listening Event will be an online campaign aimed at gauging community preferences regarding the project, alternatives, and development scenarios. The Virtual Listening Event will be shared during the first community workshop and will be accessible on the project website for an extended time to encourage participation from stakeholders who may not have been able to attend the workshop. The Virtual Listening Session will provide project context and interactive elements such as rank-choice, interactive maps, participatory budgeting, or other tools that fit the project’s needs. This versatile tool can be utilized during public workshops as well. The team will develop a notification plan to raise awareness of the tool and to encourage participation. It is envisioned that the results from the Virtual Listening Event will be compiled, organized and shared at the second community workshop.

If appropriate, the virtual listening session can be complemented with up to two in-person focus group discussions with key stakeholder representatives to get a more deliberately stratified set of perspectives.

Task 2.4 – 2.6: Community Workshops
The team will work in coordination with the Project Team and City staff to plan and facilitate up to three (3) rounds of in-person community workshops. If the City wishes to host two locations per round, the team will support up to two (2) workshops per round for a total of six (6) workshops. The table below describes the proposed topics for each of the workshops and the team will collaborate with the project team to develop necessary collateral to help educate stakeholders on the projects and engagement activities to solicit input in key aspects of the plan. The most effective activities and tools will depend on the meeting format and if a hybrid approach EXHIBIT "A" - 22 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 21
is utilized. Our team is equipped to create activities that can be implemented in-person or online, increasing accessibility and access to the public engagement process. These include interactive polling, games similar to StreetMix, and scenario building.

The team will work with City staff to coordinate event logistics including hybrid meeting set-up, dry-run rehearsals and/or research of publicly accessible and convenient meeting locations and availability, if applicable. AA will prepare and support multilingual meeting notification efforts, staffing and facilitation, meeting set-up and clean-up, meeting materials (sign-in sheets, comment cards, directional signage, etc.), photography, and post meeting summaries.

Each workshop series will offer will provide simultaneous Spanish interpretation.
◢ Optional Task:

Using video and audio technologies our team can provide a hybrid workshop experience to give stakeholders the option of attending virtually or in-person. This approach provides platforms to seamlessly integrate live discussion and audience participation. These methods include online interactive workshops via webinars, live webcasts, virtual workshops, virtual booth and interactive mapping technology.

Community feedback and input can be gathered via digital means such as online surveys, live audience polling during virtual workshops, and collecting comments during live webinars. If a hybrid or fully virtual approach is pursued, AA recommends a maximum of three (3) workshops.

Branded, targeted communications and collateral outreach help inform area stakeholders about the project. For this project, the team will develop branded graphics and flyers that provide information on upcoming community workshops. The flyers will be distributed in a stakeholder toolkit at pop-up events, and through social media posts.

The team will also assist the Project Team in developing presentation materials and signage for in-person workshops, as needed. All flyers and presentation materials will be translated into Spanish following approval of English content.

Task 2.7: Digital Outreach Efforts
To bring awareness to the project and community workshops, The team will prepare a social media information campaign and stakeholder toolkit. A social media campaign will provide a posting schedule to all City-preferred social media platforms and include branded graphics, copy, and posting content. Our team will also develop an extended outreach toolkit, aimed at community organizations, business and other key stakeholders to spread awareness of the project to their constituents. The toolkit will provide instructions on how to share the community workshop information on their social media accounts, websites, and newsletters.

Task 2.8: Outreach at Community Events
To increase engagement with historically underrepresented communities, the team recommends tabling at pop-up events.

It is envisioned that these pop-ups would be located outdoors at major destinations or city-sponsored community events. In-person engagement provides convenient access to members of the public that have limited or no access to the internet or electronic devices and be opportunities to speak with the general public. It is recommended to host an information booth prior to each community workshop to promote the meeting, offer a workshop flyer, and provide other information the project. As the project progresses, the Kimley- Horn team can offer additional information such the plan development and realistic scenarios for the project. We will provide small raffle prizes at each even to increase interest and participation.

These events will be coordinated to occur with Public Workshop #2.

Deliverables
Â Stakeholder engagement plan
Â Website and feedback forum
Â Public meeting collateral
Â Meeting Notes
Â Posts on project webpage, City website, social media posts, feedback summaries
Â Printed information materials for pop-up booths, photos

3. Sustainable Transportation Plan
Development
Task 3.1: Develop Multimodal Transportation
Strategy and Project Alternatives
The Kimley-Horn team will develop a menu of solutions both infrastructural that the City may wish to implement to reduce VMT, improve safety, enhance mode choice, and multimodal connectivity, and to make the City’s transportation system more equitable.

The task will summarize the findings from the existing conditions analysis and the Workshop #1 to identify the key barriers and associated needs to make the transportation system more sustainable, safer and more equitable.

Workshop Focus Topics
Task 2.4
Workshop #1
Overview and Virtual Listening Session
launch
 Project introduction
 Existing conditions
 Opportunities and constraints
Task 2.5
Workshop #2
Project update and ranking alternatives  Review of input received  Initial alternatives
 Transportation technology options and enhancement projects Task 2.6
Workshop #3
Report out and project update  Present Draft Sustainable Transportation Plan and Report  Solicit feedback on final plan
EXHIBIT "A" - 23 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 22
◢ Safety:

Kimley-Horn will work with the City and stakeholders to develop priority criteria and identify priority areas that will systemically address safety and sustainability issues in the City’s transportation system.

These will be paired with countermeasures that will address these priority areas and will align with state and federal countermeasures that have been identified to assist in reducing fatal & injury collisions.

The identification of the potential projects will be developed by examining the crash data and determining the appropriate countermeasures improvements to roadway segments. The team will prepare a toolbox of systemic safety mitigations using the five E’s of safety (Engineering, Education, Enforcement, Emergency Response, Emerging Technology) that can be applied citywide, or on key parts of the network. We will identify safety measures that are appropriate, cost efficient, and proven effective countermeasures by the US Department of Transportation and the FHWA.

The toolbox will be developed in three steps:
 Selection of site visit locations will be used as case studies.

Solutions that emerge from those will be associated with the conditions they are addressing and added to the toolbox.  The team will identify up to three safety emphasis areas for the City based on collision trends and patterns that can be looked at holistically to identify broader strategies that can be employed to address them.
 The best practices review will be used to identify actions the City can take to improve the safety environment.

Countermeasures will be analyzed on their potential to reduce crash activity. Projects with the greatest and most cost-efficient crash reduction potential will be prioritized. Short-term, medium-term and longer-term projects will be identified based on their cost and likelihood of reducing crashes.

The Kimley-Horn team will work with the City to develop an action plan, and provide guidance for securing funding to address recommendations and achieve the goals and objectives identified for the local road safety plan.

This plan will also include a program for updates similar to those required in a LRSP and an analysis procedure that City staff can use to update the network screening results to determine the effectiveness of countermeasures that have been implemented and to establish new priorities as existing ones are addressed and as roadway conditions and driver expectations change.
◢ Multimodal Accessibility:

The Kimley-Horn team will evaluate barriers to multimodal accessibility and connectivity across the City to evaluate the infrastructure, programs and policies most needed to increase non- single occupant vehicle mode share. The plan will specifically address connectivity between local job centers and residential areas, the future high speed rail station, and recreational amenities for those on foot bicycle or transit.

Targeted evaluation methods such as walk scores, bicycle level of stress, and transit quality will be conducted with a focus on disadvantaged neighborhoods to help the City prioritize multimodal improvements and strategies where they are most needed.

The solution of tools will be prepared in a format suitable to share in Workshop #2.

Task 3.2: Develop VMT and GHG Reduction Plan
and Housing Development
This task will begin with transportation analysis of future development based on the General Plan Update to comply with CEQA and identify areas of significant impacts as well as demand for transportation improvements in the City.

Kimley-Horn will help the City understand the most effective strategies for local VMT reduction based on current California Air Pollution Control Officers Associate (CAPCOA) Travel Demand Management guidance as well as methods to identify land use strategies that both support growth and VMT reduction.

Our team will calibrate a TREDLite model for the City of Palmdale based on input from the Travel Demand model and validated using real observed data from Teralytics and Replica mobile source databases. This will produce a block group level VMT profile for the City by land use that can be used to determine where and what mixtures of land uses can be developed that meet VMT goals, and what the most cost-effective travel demand management strategies and potential infrastructure investments would be to make development more sustainable.

Kimley-Horn will work with the City to develop up to four scenarios that achieve local VMT goals through a mixture of land use and transportation system strategies that achieve affordable housing and RHNA requirements, consider different combinations of mixed and higher density land uses, a variety of travel demand management strategies, and that take advantage of the City’s access to rail infrastructure and future access to High Speed Rail.

The scenario development process will be informed through public engagement, coordination with stakeholders and City staff, and the findings in the existing conditions report.

Task 3.3: Draft Sustainable Transportation Plan
The Kimley-Horn team will prepare interim deliverables with the intent that they will be sections of the Final report. The draft report will therefore be a compilation of the intermediate products with connective material and enhanced conclusions. The draft report will be designed for public consumption, including an emphasis on graphics and images to portray information. Denser and text heavy exposition will be included in appendices and technical memoranda for those wishing to delve further into the study methodology and detailed analysis.

Kimley-Horn recommends that the primary report be an online document or StoryMap that can be easily maintained and updated with a printable executive summary. This format maximizes accessibility of the document and emphasizes its nature as a living document that will evolve as goals are accomplished and new efforts are taken up.

EXHIBIT "A" - 24 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 23
Task 3.4: Identify Priority Implementation
Projects, Pilot Projects, and Funding Sources
As part of the previous efforts in Task 3, the Kimley-Horn team will develop an implementation strategy that aligns the strategies with implementation phases and priorities, potential funding opportunities, and options for consolidating project efforts or identifying those that are either / or. The implementation plan will be developed in conjunction with the draft report and be included in it.

Task 3.5: Joint Stakeholder Meetings
Kimley-Horn and the City will share the draft report with the key stakeholder group of City opinion leaders in advance of wider public distribution to get an initial take from a variety of perspectives. The input received from this group will be incorporated into an updated draft that can be shared more broadly with greater potential to build consensus. The resulting draft will be shared in Workshop #3.

Task 3.6: Final Sustainable Transportation Plan
The Kimley-Horn team will work with City staff to determine how to best address comments received during the draft review process and will update the document into its final form. The final report will include appropriate credits and references in its cover material.

Kimley-Horn will provide hard copies of the printed version of the report to the City as well as digital copies of all material. If the City wishes to pursue the StoryMap version of the report, all necessary access will be provided to City staff for ongoing maintenance.

Task 3.7: Present Plan to City Council
The Kimley-Horn team will develop a summary presentation of the Sustainable Transportation Plan to share with City Council at one of its regularly scheduled meetings. The consultant project manager will deliver the presentation and be prepared to answer questions to facilitate adoption of the plan.

Deliverables
Â Technical Memorandum: Citywide Safety Assessment
Â Technical Memorandum: Multimodal and Sustainable
Transportation Alternatives
Â Technical Memorandum: VMT and GHG reduction and Housing development plan
Â Draft Sustainable Transportation Plan
⤷ Implementation Strategy
⤷ Presentation material and meeting summary
Â Final Sustainable Transportation Plan Document and StoryMap Â Council Meeting Presentation
Â Council Meeting Notes

4. Fiscal Management
City of Palmdale Task.

GUIDING QUESTIONS
Understanding of Project Constraints and
Requirements
 Budget not-to-exceed $597,339?
 Project work completed by 2/23/2023?
 DBE goal of 20% is met OR demonstrated good faith effort per Caltrans/federal guidelines?
Team Member Qualifications
 Knowledgeable team members will have considerable involvement in the project?
 Team members have worked on similar projects (i.e. individual’s experience is relevant, not just firm’s experience)?
 Team includes members who are considered experts in their field?  Team has the technical capabilities and knowledge to take advantage of current industry tools/technology?
Kimley-Horn has selected a complement of key staff that have the experience and qualifications necessary to successfully implement this project. Darryl dePencier, AICP , GISP , RSP2 has helped over 40 California jurisdictions complete local safety plans and along with Mike Schmitt, AICP CTP , PTP , RSP1, who is part of the VMT analysis team at Kimley-Horn. We have strategically partnered with Arellano Associates to take advantage of their local experience with outreach and engagement with the Palmdale community, Vicus Planning for their experience in equity and multimodal integration, and LSY Enterprise for their understanding of local policies and procedures. As shown in detail in our qualifications in Section 1, each team member was hand selected to deliver the services needed for this project.

Safety Focus
 Understanding of the required deliverables?
 Have the objectives been understood?
 How well will the proposed approach meet the objectives?  Appropriate capabilities to develop high-quality, relevant, and actionable deliverables?
 Ability to provide deliverables that the City can continue to utilize, update, and maintain after the completion of this project?  Understanding of the relevant safety issues the City may face that are typical of similar cities in a similar context?
 Understanding of the unique safety issues the City faces?  Demonstrated understanding of the current best-practices for addressing safety issues?
 Demonstrated capability to perform the proper
geospatial analysis?
 Demonstrated ability to prepare actionable and
implementable deliverables?
The Kimley-Horn team understands the desire to improve
roadway safety by reducing traffic fatalities and injuries. Our approach is intended to largely mirror the Local Road Safety Plan process, producing a product that will qualify the City for HSIP funds. Kimley- Horn has successfully developed over 40 Local Road Safety Plans in EXHIBIT "A" - 25 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 24
California and our approach goes beyond the basic LRSP
requirements, really building the foundation for a future Vision Zero strategy that the City can pursue when it is ready. The completed product will include a safety profile for every roadway and intersection in the City with crash activity, and the information necessary to replicate that analysis in the future for plan updates. Our analysis process establishes localized crash rates and profile factors to make it easier to identify locations in the City that stand out as particularly troublesome from a safety perspective. We also review City performance against peer Cities and the state at large to gauge how well the City is doing in achieving its goals.

We also recognize that crash data is only part of the safety picture.

Engagement with stakeholders is a critical part of our process, and their input is “data” that gets incorporated into the study findings.

Similarly, physical roadway characteristics are not the only factor that represent safety. In California, at least 90% of traffic collisions are attributed at least in part to driver behavior. Our safety analysis procedures evaluate City policies, programs, enforcement strategies, and educational initiatives to provide a complete suite of safety opportunities and matching implementation and funding strategy.

VMT Focus
 Understanding of the required deliverables?
 Have the objectives been understood?
 How well will the proposed approach meet the objectives?  Appropriate capabilities to develop high-quality, relevant, and actionable deliverables?
 Ability to provide deliverables that the City can continue to utilize, update, and maintain after the completion of this project?  Understanding of the current relevant regulations, guidelines, best-practices, and legal precedence?
 Knowledge of mitigation measures at the project level?  Knowledge of current approaches to region/city-wide VMT mitigation strategies with significant-impact VMT areas?  Demonstrated understanding of what are realistic options for the City’s geographic and environmental context?
As the City is currently undertaking the General Plan update efforts and updating the travel demand model, the adoption of VMT thresholds and guidelines will play a crucial part in approval of future development projects in the City. Beyond the establishment of these thresholds, the City is left with land use choices, TDMs, and the introduction of new active/transit projects to address the need for feasible mitigation so that the City can fulfill its General Plan vision. In addition to considering the full complement of TDMs that are available in the recently updated CAPCOA guidelines as well as those from other sources, Kimley-Horn recognizes that other options may need to be considered to address the challenge of VMT to new development within the City. This is in part the result of the fact that TDMs are context sensitive and depending on their location may not be able to provide the full extent of VMT reduction that is desired. Among these options, Kimley-Horn plans to evaluate a framework for VMT mitigation that relies on VMT Banking or VMT Exchanges. Kimley-Horn also understands that VMT analysis methodologies and tools can make a significant impact in terms of addressing the need for accurate/complete VMT analysis. Accordingly, Kimley-Horn plans to implement TREDLite, a comprehensive VMT/GHG analysis software package, as part of its project approach. Note that the implementation cost of this software is fully accounted for in our project budget.

This tool will outlive this planning study and allow the City to expedite the analysis of projects of transportation analysis to comply with CEQA. In addition to having the full complement of 2022 CAPCOA TDM mitigation options it includes mechanisms to test and analyze projects so that they can be better designed to meet required VMT thresholds and the tool can be used to evaluate VMT Banking costs and test limits on feasible mitigation so that a reasonable determination can be made in terms of establishing “feasible” limitations to mitigation costs.

Kimley-Horn is ideally suited to help the City with this important project as we have been responsible for establishing VMT programs that include TDMs and VMT Tools for more than 25 counties and cities across varying contexts within the state. This includes numerous examples of jurisdictions with similar challenges related to density and context including cities and unincorporated areas within Riverside County, Monterey County, Santa Cruz County, San Benito County. From this experience we understand that TDMs are not a panacea to resolve VMT in low density/high VMT commute areas and that additional options are required. To that end we are currently helping three Cities develop their VMT Banking solutions and have recently been selected to help Fresno COG develop their approach.

Ultimately, the results of these efforts will expand the VMT mitigation toolbox such that project applicants will have more choices to deal with challenging VMT/GHG analysis results.

Public Outreach Focus
 Understanding of the required deliverables?
 Have the objectives been understood?
 How well will the proposed approach meet the objectives?  Appropriate capabilities to develop high-quality, relevant, and actionable deliverables?
 Ability to provide deliverables that the City can continue to utilize, update, and maintain after the completion of this project?  Demonstrated an understanding of the community’s
demographics and how best to fruitfully engage residents?  Demonstrated strong digital outreach capabilities and experience setting up and managing a digital outreach platform?
 Experience and ability to do outreach outside of the digital realm (following all relevant COVID-19 mandates and precautions)? The COVID-19 pandemic has taught the Kimley-Horn team a lot about the benefits of virtual engagement. Over the course of the pandemic, we have developed tools such as PublicCoordinate to enhance the virtual engagement experience and found that our participation rates are now higher than they were before the pandemic started. Our expectation is that as the world reopens and we are able to resume in-person meetings, we will want to maintain virtual engagement opportunities throughout our projects to make it easier and more accessible for everyone who wants to participate.

Our tools allow for virtual two-way communications with the EXHIBIT "A" - 26 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 25
community and stakeholders using a variety of media including social networking, on-line mapping, web-surveys all coupled with traditional workshops, pop-up events, and other activities.

We also know the value of keeping engagement interesting. We meet people where they are and provide information that they can absorb and understand. We don’t try to sell a vision. We listen to what they want to tell us, provide the information they need to make an informed decision, and incorporate their feedback into our plans.

We also document how their feedback was incorporated so people don’t feel they are shouting into the void. This has proven successful in building trust with the communities we work in, avoids meeting fatigue, and builds consensus.

Our approach outlined in this proposal will achieve high levels of participation, get the feedback we are looking for, and leave participants feeling good about their engagement and will be more excited to participate again in the future.

Post-Project Completion Components
 Ability to provide deliverables that the City can continue to utilize, update, and maintain after the completion of this project?  Will the safety analysis be updatable by the City within a GIS environment after the completion of this project?
 Will the VMT mitigation strategies be in a format/tool that can be used and updated by the City after the completion of this project?  Will the public outreach program and platform be updatable and manageable by the City after the completion of this project? Kimley-Horn prides itself in building independence for our clients. While we are always willing to provide ongoing support, we see a project as successful if we have passed the knowledge and tools onto our clients so that they can, with the right time and effort, be able to replicate and maintain the analysis we conducted. For our safety plans, one of our deliverables is an analysis spreadsheet complete with the statistical formulae and analysis we will be using.

The City can then copy and paste a new set of crash data into the sheet and get a similar output in future years when it is time to update. Similarly, TREDLite is a tool that the City could use in the future to manage VMT analysis of future developments or to potentially do scenario planning as its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) goals change. Our engagement strategy will also be well documented. The project website will be hosted by the City and can be maintained and updated for future work as the City wishes.

Value-Added Features
 Are there deliverables, expertise, or other items being proposed to be included that meet the intent of this project and still keep the project within the budget and time limitations?
 How well do these components help the City in respect to the intent and purpose of this project?
 Proposed value-added features with clarification how they would be fit into the given budget and schedule restrictions. If certain features are proposed as a one-or-the-other type option due to budget or time limitations, they should be identified as such Both our safety analysis and VMT analysis proposed go beyond the requested scope as Kimley-Horn has invested significantly in developing tools and processes for both. The Kimley-Horn team can provide a deep review and understanding of citywide safety conditions, the means for the City to replicate that analysis, along with a comprehensive menu of countermeasures and best practices applicable for HSIP as well as other funding opportunities. Similarly, our ability to assess and analyze VMT impacts has become much easier and we have included in the project budget the license fee for our TREDLite tool that can be leveraged beyond this study to help the City with the CEQA process as well as other VMT analyses. Lastly, our engagement process marries virtual and in-person activities. Our budget also includes license fees needed to leverage commercial engagement platforms such as our PublicCoordinate, or other systems such as Social Pinpoint that the City may have
experience with.

Potential Challenges and Solutions
One of the consistent challenges with projects like this are consistent and regular stakeholder participation. We have found that subject matter experts and key stakeholders can find it difficult to prioritize participation in these studies when their other professional and personal obligations become heavy. To that end, we make sure to outline expectations at the beginning to make sure that our stakeholders know what we are asking of them, and can opt out and suggest alternatives if they do not think they can provide the needed input. Our approach to stakeholder engagement is a flexible one. We always provide more than one forum for them to provide their input and give enough lead time to allow them to do it.

Another challenge is timely data access. Particularly on safety studies, data availability can be sporadic, and potentially incomplete. Kimley- Horn has access to all of the required data internally with no need from intervention from City staff if that should become necessary due to time or availability constraints. We have access to Caltrans’ CRS GIS network, Replica for traffic volumes and trip purposes, a close relationship with Crossroads software for up to date crash data, and several other reliable sources. Therefore, the City need only provide the local data that they want to make sure we consider as part of our analysis.

EXHIBIT "A" - 27 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 26

3. PREVIOUS RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

RELEVANT PROJECT EXAMPLES
Kimley-Horn
◢ City of Perris, Local Road Safety Plan,
Perris, CA
Kimley-Horn assisted the City of Perris with their LRSP to help prioritize the most effective ways to improve traffic safety for all users, as part of a statewide goal to reduce traffic injuries and fatalities. The LRSP addressed safety through roadway improvements, measures to modify driver behavior, and improved emergency response. The LRSP resulted in a set of data-driven recommendations, coupled with input from key stakeholders representing the four E’s of safety included in the SHSP; engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services.

Client: City of Perris
Budget: $79,124
Project Dates: 9/2020 - 8/2021
◢ StanCOG, Preparation of the 2018 Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP), Sustainable
Communities Strategy (SCS), and Environmental
Impact Report (EIR), Modesto, CA
Kimley-Horn was primarily responsible for developing and preparing the Stanislaus Council of Governments’ (STANCOG) 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS).

This included defining STANCOG’s RTP/SCS performance measures; assisting STANCOG and the local agency planning directors to develop alternative land use scenarios; travel demand modeling support, safety analysis, financial analyses, performing GIS analysis to evaluate transit and environmental justice performance measures, and extensive public outreach and presentations to the STANCOG Policy Board and member jurisdictions. The STANCOG 2018 RTP/SCS addressed all federal and state requirements for developing RTP/SCS and was adopted in August 2018.

Client: Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG)
Budget: $511,799
Project Dates: 6/2017 - 2/2020
◢ City of Monterey, Transportation Adaptation
Plan, Monterey, CA
The City of Monterey awarded Kimley-Horn the opportunity to develop the City’s Transportation Adaptation Plan. The City received $212,472 in State Public Transportation Account—Adaptation Planning Grant funds to complete the Plan no later than February 2021. The Plan built upon the City of Monterey’s Sea Level Rise and Vulnerability Analyses, Existing Conditions, and Issues Report completed in 2016.

Tasks included the following:
 Gather existing inventory of vulnerabilities and background data identified in the Sea Level Rise and Vulnerability Analyses, Existing Conditions and Issues Report completed in 2016, including project study area, study time horizon, planning assumptions, constraints, climate change projections, vulnerable areas, and asset location and information to guide preparation of the adaptation plan.  Identify specific vulnerable transportation infrastructure and interdependencies between the transportation system and other infrastructure and community services.
 Identify disadvantaged communities that would be
disproportionately affected by interruptions in the
transportation network.
 Gather existing information that addresses climate change adaptation for regional transportation systems including Transportation Agency for Monterey County’s 2018 Regional Transportation Plan and the Association of Monterey Bay Area Government’s 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. The regional plans include resources that the project will be using in its adaptation development.

Client: City of Monterey
Budget: $211,368
Project Dates: 3/2019 – 7/2021
◢ City of Pasadena, Development of VMT and VT
Mitigation Calculator Tool, Pasadena, CA
Kimley-Horn was selected by the City of Pasadena to develop a VMT per service population and VT per service population mitigation calculator tool that can quantify the effectiveness of proposed project-level CEQA mitigation strategies, intended to support the goals of SB 743. Kimley-Horn developed a Microsoft Excel-based tool that estimates the anticipated percent reduction in VMT and VT per service population resulting from the application of mobility strategies. This calculator will measure and quantify the benefit and value of additional mitigations, and provide a consistent framework for evaluating and quantifying transportation strategies into the development review and transportation analysis process as required under CEQA.

Client: City of Pasadena
Budget: $74,930
Project Dates: 6/2021 - Ongoing
◢ City of Glendale, La Crescenta Avenue Road
Rehabilitation Study, Glendale, CA
In 2012, the City of Glendale released their Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) that identified ways to strengthen their bicycle infrastructure and promote active transportation, healthy communities, and sustainability throughout the City. In keeping with the consistency of the BTP , the City tasked Kimley-Horn with providing a study for a road rehabilitation project along La Crescenta Avenue.

The road rehabilitation project provided the opportunity to change the existing lane configuration and explore options identified in the BTP . The study analyzed different alternatives such as lane reductions to include dedicated bike lanes and adding sharrows to the existing lane configuration. Kimley-Horn developed conceptual cross sections for these configurations. Analyses were performed for all scenarios EXHIBIT "A" - 28 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 27
using Synchro and TransCAD software to identify LOS and VMT. While a VMT analysis is not required for this type of project, it allowed the study to provide a comprehensive look at how these alternatives can impact the transportation network. Kimley-Horn summarized the findings for the City, so they could make an informed decision about the future of this roadway.

Client: City of Glendale
Budget: $25,547
Project Dates: 2/2020 – 1/2021
Subconsultant Experience
Arellano Associates
◢ General Plan Update, Palmdale, CA
The City of Palmdale has undertaken a multi-year effort to update their General Plan. The updated Plan will serve as a blueprint for the City’s vision for the future and position Palmdale for opportunities within the city and across the region, including economic growth and major infrastructure investments. Arellano Associates (AA) set out to create a transparent, inclusive, and diverse scope of outreach activities, while providing opportunities for engaging and building a sense of ownership to the Palmdale community. Public involvement activities to date have included a citywide awareness campaign and three rounds of interactive public engagement for the project.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the AA team provided alternate methods to reach the public with the project land-use alternatives and preferred and-use alternative, which included virtual focus groups, a virtual workshop, surveys, and live public webinars. The team also distributed surveys and project information in hard copy format and provided computer kiosks through pop-up events and at food distribution sites to ensure that those who have limited access to digital platforms were reached and able to provide input.

Going forward, the project aims to wrap up the project with a strong outreach campaign and allow for public input and involvement every step of the way. Ongoing activities will include regularly convening the General Plan Advisory Committee, including a series of topical workshops which will be open to the public, digital project awareness strategies, and a final public workshop.

Client: Carlene Saxton, City of Palmdale, (661) 267-5200, [email protected]
Budget: $206,272
Project Dates: 10/2018 – 11/2021
◢ Palmdale Avenue Q Complete Streets Project,
Palmdale, CA
The City of Palmdale developed a multimodal corridor plan with recommendations that improved walking and biking conditions for all ages and abilities, improving the comfort and safety of active transportation in high desert weather. The project also developed recommendations for land use and zoning along Avenue Q to be implemented with the city’s General Plan Update. Involving the public in a meaningful way is crucial to the long-term success of the project.

To that end, AA created an outreach program designed to inform and include as many members of the community as possible, through a variety of methods and strategies. Goals outlined in the SCAG grant agreement included at least 50 participants per workshop and 250 total survey responses. Engagement activities included two virtual public workshops, a survey, convening of a Technical Working Group, stakeholder interviews, as well as community canvassing and a pop-up event.

Client: Megan Taggart, SCAG, (661) 267-5213,
[email protected]
Budget: $59,158
Project Dates: 10/2020 – 10/2021
◢ Palmdale Comprehensive Zoning Update,
Palmdale, CA
The City of Palmdale is undertaking a comprehensive update to its Zoning Code to help implement the vision for Palmdale 2045, the ongoing update of the City’s General Plan. The update of the Zoning Code is intended to support the city’s growth in an orderly manner and promote and protect public health, safety, peace, comfort, and the general welfare in conformance with the Palmdale General Plan.

Arellano Associates will conduct community engagement by notifying the stakeholders of public meetings and other forums related to the project.

Client: Megan Taggart, City of Palmdale, (661) 267-5213, [email protected]
Budget: $14,999
Project Dates: 7/2021 – 7/2022
Vicus Planning
◢ Metro Eastside Phase 2, TOC/FLM Assessment,
Los Angeles, CA
The Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension Phase 2 LRT project is currently in the Draft EIR/EIS and Advanced Conceptual Engineering development process. Responsible for conducting the Transit Oriented Communities (TOC) assessment and First/Last Mile planning for nine stations along the proposed alignments including an evaluation of accessibility, land use, economic development and equity. TOC methodology includes conducting station area site visits, analyzing quantitative and qualitative data analysis, coordination with FLM and TOC agency staff, urban designers, city staff and stakeholders. Led stakeholder station tours of nine sites over two days, with over 30 participants including local city, county and agency staff.

Client: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (Metro)
Budget: $186,000
Project Dates: 2/2019 - 4/2020
◢ Metro Crenshaw Northern Extension, Advanced
Alternatives Analysis, TOC/FLM and Community
Outreach, Los Angeles, CA
Draft EIR and Advanced Conceptual Engineering for the Crenshaw Northern Extension (CNE) project connecting the Crenshaw-LAX Project to the Metro Purple Line on Wilshire Boulevard and the Metro Red Line in Hollywood. Vicus was responsible for the delivery of Urban Design, TOC and FLM analysis for 14 proposed station areas.

EXHIBIT "A" - 29 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 28
Led coordination with Metro, local jurisdictions, agency staff, and the public. Successfully facilitated stakeholder workshops and public meetings with hundreds of participants.

Client: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (Metro)
Budget: $109,000
Project Dates: 1/2019 - 3/2020
◢ SCAG Sustainable Communities Strategies,
Outreach. Southern California
SCAG’s Connect So Cal outreach program engaged the public and stakeholders throughout Southern California as part of the agency’s RTP/SCS update. Vicus served as a strategic outreach advisor, supporting on the development of the Connect So Cal outreach program for the six counties (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura) and 191 cities within the SCAG region.

Vicus supported public engagement activities, provided strategic advice on engagement, and facilitated meetings throughout SCAG’s six county region.

Client: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Budget: $16,000
Project Dates: 4/2019 - 10/2019
LSY Enterprise
◢ City of Palmdale, Citywide Engineering & Traffic
Survey Study, Palmdale, CA
LSY Enterprise is conducting a study to re-establish speed limits on 220 roadway segments in the City. The recommended new speed limits were adopted by City Council in January 2022. The project is in the closeout phase and is expected to be completed by March 2022.

Client: City of Palmdale
Budget: $66,000
Project Dates: 04/2021– 03/2022
◢ Cities of Lancaster, Santa Clarita and Oxnard,
Various Traffic Safety Studies, Lancaster/Santa
Clarita/Oxnard, CA
LSY Enterprise is providing peer review services for the City of Oxnard’s Long Range Safety Program (LRSP). The firm also provided peer review services for the City of Lancaster’s Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP) and conducted an LRSP . For the City of Santa Clarita, LSY Enterprise conducted a Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Study in partnership with Kimley Horn.

Client: City of Lancaster, City of Oxnard, City of Santa Clarita Budget: Lancaster - $150,000; Santa Clarita - $80,000; Oxnard - cost based on hourly as a part of on-call
Project Dates: Lancaster LRSP – ongoing; Santa Clarita, LRSP on Ped/bike – 2020; Oxnard LRSP peer review - ongoing
◢ City of Santa Clarita and City of Oxnard, Non-
Motorized Transportation Plan and Safe Routes
to School Plan, Santa Clarita/Oxnard, CA
Andrew served as the lead for the development of the City of Santa Clarita’s Non-Motorized Transportation Plan and was involved its subsequent update. This plan caused a paradigm shift in the city’s transportation planning by helping to promote and implement projects less dependent on motor vehicle uses while improving pedestrian and bicycle facilities. LSY Enterprise also developed Safe Route to School maps for more than 35 schools for the cities of Santa Clarita and Oxnard.

Client: City of Santa Clarita, City of Oxnard
Budget: Santa Clarita - $100,000; Oxnard - cost based on hourly as a part of on-call
Project Dates: Santa Clarita - 2017; Oxnard - ongoing
EXHIBIT "A" - 30 of 41
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 29
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for

4. PROJECT BUDGET AND TIMELINE

PROJECT SCHEDULE
2022 2023
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

1.4 Identify Existing Conditions TM/GIS

2.1 Comprehensive Stakeholder Engagement Plan

2.2 Creation of Project Website and Engagement Components

2.3 Listening Events

2.4 Community Workshop #1

2.5 Community Workshop #2

2.6 Community Workshop #3

2.7 Digital Outreach Efforts

2.8 Outreach at Community Events

3.1 Develop Multimodal Transportation Strategy and Project Alternatives TM

3.2 Develop VMT and GHG Reduction Plan and Housing Development TM

3.3 Draft Sustainable Transportation Plan DRAFT

3.4 Identify Priority Implementation Projects, Pilot Projects, and Funding Sources

3.6 Final Sustainable Transportation Plan FINAL

3.7 Present Plan to City Council

PRESENTATION
EXHIBIT "A" - 31 of 41
City of Palmdale  TRTP96001.2022
 30
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for

BUDGETING PROPOSAL
###### Overhead% Name
Darryl
dePencier Jean Fares Mike Schmitt
###### Overhead% w/o FCCM Category/Title
Project
Manager
Principal‐in‐
Charge
QA/QC
Task Lead
Task 1 16 8 8 12 36 24 24 48 56 232 $      44,995.22 135 $     16,876.68 16 $      2,871.00 80 $      10,145.85 463 $     74,888.74 3% 2% 2% 3% 8% 5% 5% 10% 12% 0% 50% 29% 3% 17%
Task 2 48 2 8 36 48 48 64 254 $      44,977.51 948 $     99,439.12 42 $      7,524.00 1244 $   151,940.63 4% 0% 0.16% 0% 1% 3% 4% 4% 5% 0% 20% 76% 3% 0%
Task 3 120 20 102 92 88 96 136 76 202 36 968 $    198,381.09 158 $    28,314.00 678 $      90,089.95 1804 $   316,785.04 7% 1% 6% 5% 5% 5% 8% 4% 11% 2% 54% 0% 9% 38%
Task 4
184 28 112 104 132 156 208 172 322 36 1454 1083 216 758 3511 37,952.98$   9,514.70$     33,076.78$   29,803.75$   32,118.78$   32,921.02$   39,376.42$   26,761.70$   42,197.49$   4,630.19$     41% $    288,353.82 31% $   116,315.80 6% $    38,709.00 22% $    100,235.80   $   543,614.41 $      30,800.00   $     21,300.00   $      1,000.00   $     53,100.00 $  319,153.82   $ 137,615.80   $  39,709.00   $ 100,235.80 $ 596,714.41 Kimley‐Horn and Associates, Inc.

Project Launch
Public Outreach
Project
SupportProfessional I Analyst I
Subtotal Labor:

Other Direct Costs Total
TOTAL HOURS
TOTAL COST:

Sustainable Transportation Plan Development
Fiscal Management-City's Task
Percentage of Work for Task 2
Percentage of Work for Task 3
Percentage of Work for Task 1
Kimley‐
Horn
Total
Hours
Kimley‐Horn
Total Cost
Arellano
Assoc.

Total
Hours
Arellano Assoc.

Total Cost
(DBE)
Total Project
Costs
CITY OF PALMDALE
Sustainable Transportation Plan
LSY
Total
Hours
LSY
Total Cost
Vicus
Total
Hours
Vicus
Total Cost
(DBE)
Total
Project
Hours
Sr.

Professional I Professional II Analyst IIProfessional
III
EXHIBIT "A" - 32 of 41
Professional Services for the Palmdale
Sustainable Transportat ion Plan, PN 835
Proposal and Qualifications for

STANDARD FORMS
Standard Forms
EXHIBIT "A" - 33 of 41
1/19/2022 Page 36 of 48

CITY OF PALMDALE
CONSULTANT’S ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The consultant acknowledges that he/she has read the liability insurance requirements of section 11 of the sample agreement and agrees to comply with all the liability insurance provisions and requirements. Failure of the consultant to obtain the required liability insurance after the award of contract may constitute a failure to execute the contract and shall be just cause for an annulment of the award.

As the consultant’s representative, I understand and agree to comply with all provisions of the Liability Insurance as required under the sample agreement.

Signature
2/17/2022
Jean B. Fares, Sr. V.P.

EXHIBIT "A" - 34 of 41
2/1/2022 Page 34 of 48

CITY OF PALMDALE

CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALMDALE:

The undersigned, as Consultant, declares that: (1) this proposal is made without collusion with any other person and that the only persons or parties interested as principals are those named herein; (2) the undersigned has carefully examined the Request for Proposals (including all Addenda); and (3) the undersigned has investigated and is satisfied as to the conditions to be encountered, the character, quality and quantities of Work to be performed, and the deliverables to be furnished. Furthermore, the undersigned agrees that submission of this proposal shall be conclusive evidence that such examination and investigation have been made and agrees, in the event the Agreement be awarded to it, to execute the Agreement with the City of Palmdale to perform the services in accordance with the Request for Proposals in the time and manner therein prescribed.

Consultant acknowledges receipt of all addenda, as follows:

Addendum No. _______________ Date: ____________________ Addendum No. _______________ Date: ____________________ Addendum No. _______________ Date: ____________________ Additionally, the undersigned, as Consultant, declares that: (1) the Consultant has five or more years of experience performi ng similar work and has provided design services for at least five similar projects that have been completed through construction; and (2) the Consultant has three or more excellent references.

Consultant’s Name: ____________________________________________________________ Signature: __________________________________ Title: ___________ Date: ______ Signature: __________________________________ Title: ___________ Date: ______ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Sr. V.P.
2/17/2022
2 1
2/1/2022
2/1/2022
Jean B. Fares
EXHIBIT "A" - 35 of 41
1/19/2022 Page 33 of 48

CITY OF PALMDALE
Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan
TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALMDALE:

Bidder’s Name: ____________________________________________________________ In compliance with the Request for Proposal, the undersigned hereby agrees to execute the Contract to provide professional services for the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents to the satisfaction of the City Project Manager, at the following prices:

BASE AMOUNT:

TASK
NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT

1. Project Launch $

2. Public Outreach $

3. Sustainable Transportation Plan Development $
TOTAL ($ 597,339): $
TOTAL BID PRICE IN DIGITS: $____________________
TOTAL BID PRICE IN WORDS: _________________________________________________ In the case of any discrepancy between words and figures, the words shall prevail.

Signature: __________________________________ Title: ___________ Date: ______ Signature: __________________________________ Title: ___________ Date: ______ Sr. V.P.
2/17/2022
Jean B. Fares
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
151,940.63
316,785.04
596,714.41*
*Includes Other Direct Costs -
see cost spreadsheet
74,888.74
596,714.41
Five hundred ninety-six thousand, seven hundred fourteen and forty-one cents EXHIBIT "A" - 36 of 41
EXHIBIT "A" - 37 of 41
EXHIBIT "A" - 38 of 41

CITY OF PALMDALE
PN 835 – Request for Proposal and Qualifications for Professional Services for the Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan
02/01/2022
ADDENDUM NO. 1
______________________________________________________________________ This addendum is attached to and is part of the Request for Proposal and Qualifications for PN 835 and must be acknowledged in the Certificate of Proposal Form due on March 3, 2022, as well as signed and submitted with the Proposal and Qualifications due on February 17, 2022 (it does not count as part of the 30-page limit noted in Section C).

Questions and Clarifications from the Pre-Proposal Information Session held on 1/26/22 and Requests for Clarification received by the February 1, 2022 deadline. __________________________________________________________________________________

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDUM
I/We the undersigned, hereby acknowledged receipt of the above addendum, and understand that my/our bid may be disqualified if the addendum is not signed and included in the Proposal Documents.

Signature:

Name:

Title:

Company:

Date:

Darryl dePenicer, AICP, GISP, RSP1
Project Manager
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

February 17, 2022
EXHIBIT "A" - 39 of 41

CITY OF PALMDALE
PN 835 – Request for Proposal and Qualifications for Professional Services for the Palmdale Sustainable Transportation Plan
02/01/2022
ADDENDUM NO. 2
______________________________________________________________________ This addendum is attached to and is part of the Request for Proposal and Qualifications for PN 835 and must be acknowledged in the Certificate of Proposal Form due on March 3, 2022, as well as signed and submitted with the Proposal and Qualifications due on February 17, 2022 (it does not count as part of the 30-page limit noted in Section C).

Revised the Certification of Proposal standard form on page 34 of the original RFP/Q to remove language conflicting with the contents of Sections B and C of the RFP/Q. __________________________________________________________________________________

Signature:

Name:

Title:

Company:

Date:

Darryl dePenicer, AICP, GISP, RSP1
Project Manager
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

February 17, 2022
EXHIBIT "A" - 40 of 41

CONTACT
Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP2
[email protected]
213.261.4039
660 South Figueroa St
Suite 2050
Los Angeles, CA 00000
www.kimley-horn.com
The entirety of this proposal, including text and images, is the property of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., protected under U.S. copyright law.

EXHIBIT "A" - 41 of 41
City Council Staff Report
DATE: MARCH 16, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DIVISION
DISTRICT: 1
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. CC 2022-020, A RESOLUTION OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALMDALE AUTHORIZING THE

APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE RECREATIONAL

TRAILS PROGRAM FOR THE BARREL SPRINGS TRAIL

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ISSUE
Adopt Resolution No. C C 2022-020, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palmdale authorizing the application for grant funds from the Recreational Trails Program for the Barrel Springs Trail Improvement Project.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. CC 2022-020 authorizing the application for grant funds from the Recreational Trails Program (RTP) for the Barrel Springs Trail Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND
The Recreational Trails Programs (RTP) is a state-administered local assistance program of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that provides annual funds to the States to develop and maintain Recreational Trails and trail- related facilities for both non-motorized and motorized Recreational Trail uses. Within the State of California, the Department of Parks and Recreation is authorized to administer the program. Available Recreational Trails Program funds for the 202 2 Grant Cycle amount to $2,700,000 and will be divided between both the motorized and non-motorized programs.

The City’s grant writing consultant, Townsend Public Affairs, recommends applying for the Recreation Trails Non-Motorized Program (RTP), as this is currently one of the only trails eligible for this application. This project will be competitive against other state and national projects in the following areas: construction of new trails, connectivity, linkages, accessibility, and involvement.

Report to Mayor and City Council
Re: Adoption of Resolution No. CC 2022-020
March 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

DISCUSSION
The grant application to the State of California is due on April 7, 2022. Grant application results will be announced in Fall 2022.

If awarded, the proposed improvements to the trail would include:
 Signage, including restoration of trail monument signs, educational signage, and trail markers
 Repair of broken and/or missing fence rails and posts  Additional trash receptacles and pet waste stations
 Trail and parking lot erosion control improvements
 Installation of swing gates

FISCAL IMPACT
The Recreational Trails Program (RTP) does not establish a maximum grant request amount but does require that the grant requests not exceed 88% of the total project cost.

This means the application requires a match of at least 12% of the total project cost.

Eligible match sources include state funds, local funds, private funds, donated materials and services and other federal funds. If awarded, funds are available in the Measure A Maintenance Services fund balance and can be allocated to this project to cover the required City match funding. Total project costs are estimated in the table below:

Description of Work RTP Grant
Funding
City Match
Funding Total
Signage $39,600 $5,400 $45,000
Fence Repair $17,600 $2,400 $20,000
Trash Receptacles/Pet Waste Stations $6,160 $840 $7,000 Trail & Parking Lot Erosion Control Imp $35,200 $4,800 $40,000 Swing Gates $9,680 $1,320 $11,000
Labor Compliance $1,320 $180 $1,500
City Administration $5,280 $720 $6,000
Subtotal: $114,840 $15,660 $130,500
Note: This table is intended as an estimate; changes to these figures may and are expected to occur before and during construction.

Report to Mayor and City Council
Re: Adoption of Resolution No. CC 2022-020
March 16, 2022

Page 3 ends

STRATEGIC PLAN
Goal III: Invest in infrastructure to improve community livability.

C. Plan and maintain safe and attractive neighborhoods, streets, facilities, and public spaces with exciting programming that promotes active fun for everyone.

Prepared by: Chuck Heffernan, P.E. Director of Public Works Certified as to availability of Funds: Keith Kang, Finance Manager Approved by: Ronda Perez, Interim City Manager
Approved as to form: Christopher Beck, City Attorney

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. CC 2022-020

CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. CC 2022-020

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALMDALE

APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE
RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM.

WHEREAS, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST-ACT) provides funds to the State of California for Grants to federal, state, local and non- profit organizations to acquire, develop and/or maintain motorizes and non-motorized trail projects; and
WHEREAS the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures governing Project Application under the program; and WHEREAS said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation required the Applicant to certify by resolution the approval of Application(s) before submission of said Application(s) to the State; and WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of California to complete the Project.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PALMDALE DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1 . Approves the filing of an Application for the Recreational Trails Program.

SECTION 2. Certifies that the Project is consistent with the Applicant’s general plan or the equivalent planning document.

SECTION 3 . Certifies that said Applicant has or will have available prior to commencement of any work on the Project included in this Application, sufficient funds to operate and maintain the Project.

SECTION 4. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands, and agreed to the General Provisions contained in the Contract show in the Procedural Guide.

Resolution No. CC 2022-020

Page 2 of 2 ends

Palmdale City CouncilMarch 16, 2022

Palmdale City Council
March 16, 2022