Paso Robles City Council
April 18, 2023

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
7 Ambient Air Quality
Air pollutant concentrations are measured at several monitoring stations in the SCCAB. The Paso RoblesSanta Fe Avenue is the closest representative monitoring station with sufficient data to meet U.S. EPA and/or ARB criteria for quality assurance. Ambient monitoring data was obtained for the last three years of available measurement data (i.e., 2019 through 2021) and is summarized in Table 2. As depicted, the state and federal PM2.5 standards were exceeded for 11 days in 2020. The state standard for PM10 was exceeded on 4 days in 2020. The national standard for 8-hour ozone concentration was exceeded on 2 days in 2020. Measured 1- hour ozone and NO2 concentrations did not exceed the state and federal ambient air quality standards in the last three years of monitoring.

Table 2. Summary of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Pollutant Monitoring Year
2019 2020 2021
Ozone (O3)
(1)
Maximum concentration (1-hour/8-hour average; ppm) 0.077/0.064 0.092/0.073 0.070/0.064 Number of days state/national 1-hour standard exceeded 0/0 0/0 0/0 Number of days state/national 8-hour standard exceeded NA/0 NA/2 NA/0 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
(2)
Maximum concentration (1-hour average; ppb) 34.0 33.0 44.0 Number of days state/national standard exceeded 0/0 0/0 0/0 Suspended Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
(2)
Maximum 24-hour concentration (national/state; μg/m3) 17.3/17.3 242.1/242.1 19.1/19.1 Number of days national standard exceeded
(measured/calculated)(3) 0/0 11/11.1 0/0
Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10)
(1)
Maximum concentration (national/state; μg/m3) 134.4/138.0 367.8/357.2 74.4/74.7 Number of days state standard exceeded
(measured/calculated)(3) 9/NA 35/36 3/3.1
Number of days national standard exceeded
(measured/calculated)(3) 0/0 4/4 0/0
ppm = parts per million by volume, μg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter, NA=Not Available

1. Based on ambient concentrations obtained from the Paso Robles-Santa Fe Avenue. Monitoring Station.

2. Based on ambient concentrations obtained from the Atascadero-Lift Station #5 Monitoring Station.

3. Measured days are those days that an actual measurement was greater than the standard. Calculated days are estimated days that measurement would have exceeded the standard had measurements been collected every day.

Source: ARB 2021
Air Quality Index
The health effects of ambient air pollutant concentrations can be evaluated and presented in various ways.

The most common method is the use of the Air Quality Index (AQI). The U.S. EPA developed the AQI as an easy-to-understand measure of health impacts based on measured ambient air quality in comparison to established ambient air quality standards. Tables 3 and 4 present a summary of the health impacts for ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), respectively, based on the U.S. EPA’s AQI.

A summary of the annual air quality index for the project area, based on monitoring data obtained from the Paso Robles monitoring station for the last three years of available data, is provided in Table 5. As depicted in Table 5, the project area typically experiences "good” air quality with the total number of days ranging from 209 to 230 days per year. Days classified as “moderate” AQI ranged from 104 to 148 days per year. Over the last three years of available data, the area has experience a total of 32 days classified as “Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups”, 8 days classified as “Unhealthy”, and 2 days classified as “Very Unhealthy”. Over the past three years, the area has not experienced air quality conditions within the “Hazardous” range (U.S. EPA 2022).

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
8 Table 3. Air Quality Index Summary for Ozone & Related Health Effects Air Quality Index / 8-hour Ozone
Concentration
Health Effects Description
AQI 51-100: Moderate
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 55-70 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.

Health Effects Statements: Unusually sensitive individuals may experience respiratory symptoms.

Cautionary Statements: Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting prolonged outdoor exertion.

AQI 101-150: Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 71-85 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.

Health Effects Statements: Increasing likelihood of respiratory symptoms and breathing discomfort in active children and adults and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma.

Cautionary Statements: Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should limit prolonged outdoor exertion.

AQI 151–200: Unhealthy
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 86-105 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.

Health Effects Statements: Greater likelihood of respiratory symptoms and breathing difficulty in active children and adults and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma; possible respiratory effects in general population.

Cautionary Statements: Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should limit prolonged outdoor exertion; everyone else, especially children, should limit prolonged outdoor exertion.

AQI 201-300: Very Unhealthy
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 106-200 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.

Health Effects Statements: Increasingly severe symptoms and impaired breathing likely in active children and adults and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma; increasing likelihood of respiratory effects in general population
Cautionary Statements: Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should avoid outdoor exertion; everyone else, especially children, should limit outdoor exertion.

An AQI of 50 and below is categorized as “Good” and air quality is satisfactory, and poses little or no risk. An AQI of 301 or higher is categorized as “Hazardous” having a health warning of emergency conditions: everyone is more likely to be affected. Outdoor activities should be avoided for all individuals.

Source: U.S. EPA 2022
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
9 Table 4. Air Quality Index Summary for Fine Particulate Matter & Related Health Effects
AIR QUALITY INDEX / 8-HOUR OZONE

CONCENTRATION
Health Effects Description
AQI 51-100: Moderate
Ambient Concentrations: 12.1-35.4 µg/m3
Sensitive Groups: Some people who may be unusually sensitive to particulate
Health Effects Statements: Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.

Cautionary Statements: Unusually sensitive people: Consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion. Watch for symptoms such as coughing or shortness of breath. These are signs to take it easier.

AQI 101-150: Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
Ambient Concentrations: 35.5-55.4 µg/m3
Sensitive Groups: People with heart or lung disease, older adults, children, and teenagers.

Health Effects Statements: Increasing likelihood of respiratory symptoms for sensitive individuals, aggravation of heart or lung disease and premature mortality in persons with cardiopulmonary disease, and the elderly.

Cautionary Statements: If you have heart disease: Symptoms such as palpations, shortness of breath, or unusual fatigue may indicate a serious problem. If you have any of these, contact a health care provider.

AQI 151–200: Unhealthy
Ambient Concentrations: 55.5-150.4 µg/m3
Sensitive Groups: Everyone.

Health Effects Statements: Increased aggravation of heart or lung disease and premature mortality in persons with cardiopulmonary disease, and the elderly; increased respiratory effects in general population.

Cautionary Statements: Sensitive groups: Avoid prolonged or heavy exertion. Consider moving activities indoors or rescheduling. Everyone else: Reduce prolonged or heavy exertion. Take more breaks during outdoor activities.

AQI 201-300: Very Unhealthy
Ambient Concentrations: 150.5-250.4 µg/m3
Sensitive Groups: Everyone.

Health Effects Statements: Significant aggravation of heart or lung disease and premature mortality in persons with cardiopulmonary disease, and the elderly; significant increase in respiratory effects in general population.

Cautionary Statements: Sensitive groups: Avoid all physical activity outdoors. Move activities indoors or reschedule to a time when air quality is better. Everyone else: Avoid prolonged or heavy exertion. Consider moving activities indoors or reschedule to a time when air quality is better.

An AQI of 50 and below is categorized as “Good” and air quality is satisfactory, and poses little or no risk. An AQI of 301 or higher is categorized as “Hazardous” having a health warning of emergency conditions: everyone is more likely to be affected. Outdoor activities should be avoided for all individuals.

Source: U.S. EPA 2022
Table 5. Air Quality Index Annual Historical Summary
Year
Air Quality Index (AQI) - Number of Days
Good Moderate
Unhealthy for
Sensitive
Groups Unhealthy
Very
Unhealthy Hazardous
2021 209 148 8 0 0 0
2020 211 124 21 8 2 0
2019 230 132 3 0 0 0
Based on monitoring for the Paso Robles monitoring station. Represents overall air quality taking into account all criteria pollutants measured.

Source: U.S, EPA 2022
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
10 Regulatory Framework
Air quality within the SCCAB is regulated by several jurisdictions including the U.S. EPA, ARB, and the SLOAPCD.

Each of these jurisdictions develops rules, regulations, and policies to attain the goals or directives imposed upon them through legislation.

Federal
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
At the federal level, the U.S. EPA has been charged with implementing national air quality programs. The U.S.

EPA’s air quality mandates are drawn primarily from the FCAA, which was signed into law in 1970. Congress substantially amended the FCAA in 1977 and again in 1990.

FEDERAL CLEAN AIR ACT
The FCAA required the US EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or National AAQS), and also set deadlines for their attainment. Two types of NAAQS have been established: primary standards, which protect public health, and secondary standards, which protect public welfare from non-healthrelated adverse effects, such as visibility restrictions. NAAQS are summarized in Table 6.

State

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
The ARB is the agency responsible for coordination and oversight of state and local air pollution control programs in California and for implementing the CCAA of 1988. Other ARB duties include monitoring air quality (in conjunction with air monitoring networks maintained by air pollution control districts and air quality management districts, establishing California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), which in many cases are more stringent than the NAAQS, and setting emissions standards for new motor vehicles. The CAAQS are summarized in Table 6. The emission standards established for motor vehicles differ depending on various factors including the model year, and the type of vehicle, fuel, and engine used.

CALIFORNIA CLEAN AIR ACT
The CCAA requires that all air districts in the state endeavor to achieve and maintain CAAQS for Ozone, CO, SO2, and NO2 by the earliest practicable date. The CCAA specifies that districts focus particular attention on reducing the emissions from transportation and area-wide emission sources, and the act provides districts with authority to regulate indirect sources. Each district plan is required to either (1) achieve a five percent annual reduction, averaged over consecutive 3-year periods, in district-wide emissions of each nonattainment pollutant or its precursors, or (2) to provide for the implementation of all feasible measures to reduce emissions. Any planning effort for air quality attainment would thus need to consider both state and federal planning requirements.

ASSEMBLY BILLS 1807 & 2588 - TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS
Within California, TACs are regulated primarily through AB 1807 (Tanner Air Toxics Act) and AB 2588 (Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987). The Tanner Air Toxics Act sets forth a formal procedure for ARB to designate substances as TACs. This includes research, public participation, and scientific peer review before ARB designates a substance as a TAC. Existing sources of TACs that are subject to the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act are required to: (1) prepare a toxic emissions inventory; (2) prepare a risk assessment if emissions are significant; (3) notify the public of significant risk levels; and (4) prepare and implement risk reduction measures.

IN-USE OFF-ROAD DIESEL VEHICLE REGULATION
On July 26, 2007, the ARB adopted a regulation to reduce DPM and NOx emissions from in-use (existing) offroad heavy-duty diesel vehicles in California. The regulation applies to self-propelled diesel-fueled vehicles that cannot be registered and licensed to drive on-road, as well as two-engine vehicles that drive on road, Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
11 with the limited exception of two-engine sweepers. Examples include loaders, crawler tractors, skid steers, backhoes, forklifts, airport ground support equipment, water well drilling rigs, and two-engine cranes. Such vehicles are used in construction, mining, and industrial operations. The regulation does not apply to stationary equipment or portable equipment such as generators. The off-road vehicle regulation establishes emissions performance requirements, reporting, disclosure, and labeling requirements for off-road vehicles, and limits unnecessary idling.

CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
The California Building Code (CBC) contains standards that regulate the method of use, properties, performance, or types of materials used in the construction, alteration, improvement, repair, or rehabilitation of a building or other improvement to real property. The California Building Code is adopted every three years by the Building Standards Commission (BSC). In the interim, the BSC also adopts annual updates to make necessary mid-term corrections. The CBC standards apply statewide; however, a local jurisdiction may amend a CBC standard if it makes a finding that the amendment is reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions.

GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
In essence, green buildings standards are indistinguishable from any other building standards. Both standards are contained in the California Building Code and regulate the construction of new buildings and improvements. The only practical distinction between the two is that whereas the focus of traditional building standards has been protecting public health and safety, the focus of green building standards is to improve environmental performance.

AB 32, which mandates the reduction of GHG emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020, increased the urgency around the adoption of green building standards. In its scoping plan for the implementation of AB 32, ARB identified energy use as the second largest contributor to California’s GHG emissions, constituting roughly 25 percent of all such emissions. In recommending a green building strategy as one element of the scoping plan, ARB estimated that green building standards would reduce GHG emissions by approximately 26 MMT of CO2e by 2020.

The green buildings standards were most recently updated on May 2018. Referred to as the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, this most recent update focus on four key areas: smart residential photovoltaic systems, updated thermal envelope standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to the exterior and vice versa), residential and nonresidential ventilation requirements, and nonresidential lighting requirements.

The ventilation measures improve indoor air quality, protecting homeowners from air pollution originating from outdoor and indoor sources. Under the newly adopted standards, nonresidential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades. The recently updated 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards also require new homes built after January 1, 2020 to be equipped with solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. The solar PV systems are to be sized based on the buildings annual electricity demand, the building square footage, and the climate zone within which the home is located. However, under the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, homes may still rely on other energy sources, such as natural gas. Compliance with the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, including the solar PV system mandate, residential dwellings will use approximately 50 to 53 percent less energy than those under the 2016 standards. Actual reduction will vary depending on various factors (e.g., building orientation, sun exposure). Non-residential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades (CEC 2019).

The recently updated 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (2022 Standards), which were approved in December 2021, encourages efficient electric heat pumps, establishes electric-ready requirements when natural gas is installed and to support the future installation of battery storage, and further expands solar photovoltaic and battery storage standards. The 2022 Standards extend solar PV system requirements, as well as battery storage capabilities for select land uses, including high-rise multi-family and non-residential land uses, such as office buildings, schools, restaurants, warehouses, theaters, grocery stores, and more.

Depending on the land use and other factors, solar systems should be sized to meet targets of up to 60 percent of the structure’s loads. These new solar requirements will become effective January 1, 2023 and contribute to California’s goal of reaching net-zero carbon footprint by 2045 (CEC 2022).

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
12 Table 6. Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards & Attainment Designations Source: SLOAPCD 2020a
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
13 Local

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT The SLOAPCD is the agency primarily responsible for ensuring that NAAQS and CAAQS are not exceeded and that air quality conditions within the region are maintained. Responsibilities of the SLOAPCD include, but are not limited to, preparing plans for the attainment of ambient air quality standards, adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning sources of air pollution, issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollution, inspecting stationary sources of air pollution and responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, and implementing programs and regulations required by the FCAA and the CCAA.

CITY OF PASO ROBLES
The City of Paso Roble’s General Plan includes numerous policies related to air quality. These policies address emissions generated by mobile and non-mobile sources and land use compatibility. The General Plan includes the following policies related to air quality:
• Circulation Element - Policy CE-1A. Circulation Master Plan. Revise/update the City’s Circulation Master Plan to address the mobility needs of all users of the streets, roads and highways including motorists, movers of commercial goods, seniors, children, pedestrians, disabled persons, users of public transportation, and bicyclists.
• Circulation Element - Policy CE-1B. Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The City shall strive to reduce VMT generated per household per weekday by making efficient use of existing transportation facilities and by providing direct routes for pedestrians and bicyclists through the implementation of sustainable planning principles.
• Circulation Element - Policy CE-1C. Airport. Improve/expand transportation to and from the Paso Robles Municipal Airport as set forth in the Airport Master Plan • Circulation Element - Policy CE-1D. Transit. Improve and expand transit services. • Circulation Element - Policy CE-1E. Rail. Promote regional, interstate and intra-state rail service. • Circulation Element - Policy CE-1F. Pedestrian and Bicycle Access. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access to all areas of the City. • Conservation Element - Policy C-2A. Traffic Congestion Reduction. Implement circulation systems improvements to reduce congestion and associated air contaminant emissions. • Conservation Element - Policy C-2B. VMT Reduction. Implement programs to reduce the number of VMT, especially by single occupant vehicles, including providing opportunities for mixed-use projects.
• Conservation Element - Policy C-2C. Emissions Reduction. Take steps to reduce creation of air contaminant emissions.

Impact Analysis
Thresholds of Significance
In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, air quality impacts associated with the proposed project would be considered significant if it would:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

To assist in the evaluation of air quality impacts, the SLOAPCD has developed recommended significance thresholds, which are contained in the SLOAPCD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (2012). For the purposes of this analysis, project emissions are considered potentially significant impacts if any of the following SLOAPCD thresholds are exceeded:

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
14 Construction Impacts
The threshold criteria established by the SLOAPCD to determine the significance and appropriate mitigation level for a project’s short-term construction emissions are presented in Table 7 and discussed, as follows (SLOAPCD 2012):

Table 7. SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Project-Level Construction Impacts Pollutant
Threshold (1)
Daily (lbs/day) Quarterly Tier 1
(tons)
Quarterly Tier 2
(tons)
Ozone Precursors (ROG + NOX) 137 2.5 6.3
Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) 7 0.13 0.32
Fugitive Particulate Matter (PM10), Dust (2) -- 2.5 --

1. Daily and quarterly emissions thresholds are based on the California Health & Safety Code and the ARB Carl Moyer Guidelines.

2. Any project with a grading area greater than 4.0 acres of a worked area can exceed the 2.5 tons PM10 quarterly threshold.

Source: SLOAPCD 2012
ROG and NOx Emissions
Daily: For construction projects exceeding the 137 lbs/day threshold requires Standard Mitigation Measures; Quarterly – Tier 1: For construction projects exceeding the 2.5 tons/quarter threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures and Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for construction equipment. Off-site mitigation may be required if feasible mitigation measures are not implemented, or if no mitigation measures are feasible for the project.

Quarterly – Tier 2: For construction projects exceeding the 6.3 tons/quarter threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures, BACT, implementation of a Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) and offsite mitigation are required.

Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) Emissions
Daily: For construction projects exceeding the 7 lbs/day threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures; Quarterly - Tier 1: For construction projects lasting more than one quarter, exceedance of the 0.13 tons/quarter threshold requires Standard Mitigation Measures, BACT for construction equipment; and, Quarterly - Tier 2: For construction projects exceeding the 0.32 tons/quarter threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures, BACT, implementation of a CAMP, and off-site mitigation.

Fugitive Particulate Matter (PM10), Dust Emissions
Quarterly- Tier 1: For construction projects exceeding the 2.5 tons/quarter threshold requires Fugitive PM10 Mitigation Measures and may require the implementation of a CAMP.

Operational Impacts
Criteria Air Pollutants
The threshold criteria established by the SLOAPCD to determine the significance and appropriate mitigation level for long-term operational emissions from a project are presented in Table 8.

Table 8. SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Project-Level Operational Impacts Pollutant Threshold 1
Daily (lbs/day) Annual (tons/year)
Ozone Precursors (ROG + NOX) 25 25
Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM)2 1.25 --
Fugitive Particulate Matter (PM10), Dust 25 25
CO 550 --

1. Daily and annual emissions thresholds are based on the California Health & Safety Code Division 26, Part 3, Chapter 10, Section 40918 and the ARB Carl Moyer Guidelines for DPM.

2. Applies to on-site emissions. DPM is seldom emitted from individual projects in quantities which lead to local or regional air quality attainment violations.

Source: SLOAPCD 2012
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
15 Toxic Air Contaminants
If a project has the potential to emit toxic or hazardous air pollutants, or is located in close proximity to sensitive receptors, impacts may be considered significant due to increased cancer risk for the affected population, even at a very low level of emissions. For the evaluation of new proposed land use projects that generate toxic air contaminants, such as diesel-fueled engines, the SLOAPCD has defined the excess cancer risk significance threshold at 10 in a million.

Localized CO Concentrations
Localized CO concentrations associated with the proposed project would be considered a less-thansignificant impact if: (1) Traffic generated by the proposed project would not result in deterioration of signalized intersection level of service (LOS) to LOS E or F; or (2) the project would not contribute additional traffic to a signalized intersection that already operates at LOS of E or F (Caltrans 1996).

Odors
Screening of potential odor impacts is typically recommended for the following two situations:
• Projects that would potentially generate odorous emissions proposed to locate near existing sensitive receptors or other land uses where people may congregate; and • Residential or other sensitive receptor projects or other projects that may attract people locating near existing odor sources.

If the proposed project would locate receptors and known odor sources within one mile of each other, a full analysis of odor impacts is recommended. Known odor sources of primary concern, as identified by the SLOAPCD include landfills, transfer stations, asphalt batch plants, rendering plants, petroleum refineries, and painting/coating operations, as well as, composting, food processing, wastewater treatment, chemical manufacturing, and feedlot/dairy facilities.

Methodology
Emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2022.1.1.2, computer program. Project construction is anticipated to occur over an approximately 17-month period beginning in 2023. Construction phase durations were based on model defaults. No existing structure would be demolished. A total of approximately 7,200 cubic yards (cy) of material would be exported during grading. Additional construction information such as off-road equipment use, worker vehicle trips, and equipment load factors were based on default parameters contained in the model. Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix B of this report.

Long-term operational emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod, version 2022.1.1.2 based, in part, on vehicle trip-generation rates derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project (CCTC 2022). Vehicle travel distribution/distances were not available and were based on model defaults for the County. Emission modeling files are provided in Appendix B.

Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Impact AQ-A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? SLOAPCD Clean Air Plan
As part of the CCAA, the SLOAPCD is required to develop a plan to achieve and maintain the state ozone standard by the earliest practicable date. The SLOAPCD’s 2001 Clean Air Plan (CAP) addresses the attainment and maintenance of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The CAP was adopted by SLOAPCD’s on March 26, 2002.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
16 The SLOAPCD’s CAP outlines the District's strategies to reduce ozone-precursor pollutants (i.e., ROG and NOX) from a wide variety of sources. The SLOAPCD’s CAP includes a stationary-source control program, which includes control measures for permitted stationary sources; as well as transportation and land use management strategies to reduce motor vehicle emissions and use. The stationary-source control program is administered by SLOAPCD. Transportation and land use control measures are implemented at the local or regional level, by promoting and facilitating the use of alternative transportation options, increased pedestrian access and accessibility to community services and local destinations, reductions in vehicle miles traveled, and promotion of congestion management efforts. In addition, local jurisdictions also prepare population forecasts, which are used by SLOAPCD to forecast population-related emissions and air quality attainment, including those contained in the SLOAPCD’s CAP. As a result, consistency with the SLOAPCD’s CAP has been evaluated based on the proposed project’s consistency with the land use management strategies and transportation control measures identified in the CAP. This analysis also provides an analysis of regional vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and consistency with regional VMT-reduction efforts. Regional VMT estimates are relied upon for regional air quality planning purposes. Regional VMT and growth projections are used to determine the strategies to be implemented sufficient to reach the emission reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board through SB 375 which is transportation legislation that supports the broader 2030 emission reduction targets required in SB 32.

Transportation and Land Use Control Measures
The SLOAPCD’s CAP includes multiple transportation and land use control measures intended to reduce emissions through reductions in VMT and the promotion of alternative forms of transportation. The control measures applicable to the proposed project are summarized in Table 9. As noted the proposed project would be considered consistent with these applicable measures.

Table 9. Project Consistency with SLOAPCD’s CAP Transportation and Land Use Control Measures
Control Measures Project Consistency
Land Use Planning Strategies
L-3 Balancing Jobs and Housing.
• Within cities and unincorporated communities, the gap between the availability of jobs and housing should be
narrowed and should not be allowed to expand.

Consistent. The proposed project is located within the
City’s limits and would not result in the development
of residential land uses. The project would, however,
result in the creation of new jobs, which would help to reduce the gap between jobs and housing.

Improvements in a jobs-to-housing imbalance would
be anticipated to help support and promote local
and regional improvements related to increased
transportation mobility and potential reductions in
VMT (SLOCOG 2019). The proposed project would be
consistent with this measure.

Transportation Control Measures
T-2B Regional Public Transit Improvements.
• The goal of this measure is to improve transit service and facilities that will promote increased public transit use instead of a private automobile.

Consistent with Mitigation Incorporated.
• Existing transit services do not have a route that
passes the project location.
• The Project supports the use of bicycle and
pedestrian access. Mitigation Measure AQ-3
would require implementation of additional
measures to reduce operational emissions,
including the installation of bicycle storage in
exceedance of current building code
requirements.

Projected Population, Employment & VMT Growth
The project would not result in an increase in residents. The project would, however, result in an increase in employment. According to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, the City of Paso Robles has about 14 percent more housing units than jobs, indicative of a “jobs-poor” community. The City’s jobs to housing ratio is estimated to increase from a year 2015 ratio of 0.87 jobs/housing to a ratio of 0.89 jobs/housing by year 2035. The City of Paso Robles is projected to reduce the imbalance between jobs and housing units. The Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
17 proposed project would result in increased employment and would not result in an increase in housing. As a result, the proposed project would be anticipated to improve the jobs-housing imbalance. In addition, based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project, the project is forecast to have a work VMT per employee that is below the threshold of 85% of the regional average work VMT per employee (CCTC 2022). Accordingly, the project is projected to decrease regional work VMT and would not be considered to conflict with regional VMT-reduction efforts and associated reductions in mobile-source emissions accounted for in the SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Particulate Matter Report – Implementation of SB 656 Requirements In July 2005, SLOAPCD adopted the Particulate Matter Report (PM Report). The PM Report identifies various measures and strategies to reduce public exposure to PM emitted from a wide variety of sources, including emissions from permitted stationary sources and fugitive sources, such as construction activities. As discussed in Impact AQ-B, uncontrolled fugitive dust generated during construction may result in localized pollutant concentrations that may result in increased nuisance concerns to nearby land uses. Therefore, constructiongenerated emissions of PM would be considered to have a potentially significant impact with regard to air quality planning efforts.

Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-2 (refer to Impact AQ-B).

Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would include measures to reduce constructiongenerated emissions. Additional mitigation measures have been included that would further reduce projectrelated operational emissions. Together these measures would help to reduce PM emissions and provide consistency with SLOAPCD’s airborne PM-reduction efforts as well as measures identified in the SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Impact AQ-B. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Short-term Construction Emissions
Construction-generated emissions are of temporary duration, lasting only as long as construction activities occur, but have the potential to represent a significant air quality impact. Construction of the proposed project would result in the temporary generation of emissions associated with clearing, site prep, grading, building construction, paving, motor vehicle exhaust associated with construction equipment and worker trips, as well as the movement of construction equipment on unpaved surfaces. Short-term construction emissions would result in increased emissions of ozone-precursor pollutants (i.e., ROG and NOX) and emissions of PM. Emissions of ozone-precursors would result from the operation of on- and off-road motorized vehicles and equipment. Emissions of airborne PM are largely dependent on the amount of ground disturbance associated with site preparation activities and can result in increased concentrations of PM that can adversely affect nearby sensitive land uses.

Estimated maximum daily and quarterly emissions associated with construction of the proposed project are presented in Table 10 and Table 11, respectively. Construction generated emissions were compared to SLOAPCD’s recommended significance thresholds (Daily, Quarterly Tier 1, and Quarterly Tier 2). As depicted in Table 10, maximum daily emissions associated with project construction would total approximately 32.31 lbs/day of ROG+NOX, 1.3 lbs/day of exhaust PM10, and 1.2 lbs/day of exhaust PM2.5. As depicted in Table 11, maximum quarterly construction-generated emissions would total approximately 0.18 tons/quarter of ROG+NOX, 0.02 tons/quarter of fugitive PM10, and <0.01 tons/quarter of exhaust PM2.5.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
18 Table 10. Daily Construction Emissions without Mitigation Construction Activity Construction
Year
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1
ROG NOX ROG+NOX CO
PM10 PM2.5
Exhaust Dust Total Exhaust Dust Total
Clearing 2023 1.27 12.8 14.07 11.2 0.58 1.7 2.28 0.53 0.88 1.41 Site Prep 2023 1.64 16.6 18.24 16.9 0.76 1.7 2.46 0.7 0.88 1.58 Grading 2023 1.79 17.4 19.19 15.9 0.82 1.85 2.67 0.76 0.89 1.65 Building Construction 2023 1.26 11.8 13.06 13.2 0.55 0 0.55 0.51 0 0.51 Building Construction 2024 1.2 11.2 12.4 13.1 0.5 0 0.5 0.46 0 0.46 Paving 2024 0.85 7.81 8.66 10 0.39 0 0.39 0.36 0 0.36
Architectural Coating2 2024 9.48 0.91 10.39 1.15 0.005 0.03 0.035 0.03 0 0.03 Trenching 2024 0.24 2.4 2.64 3.83 0.11 0 0.11 0.1 0 0.1 SLOAPCD Daily Thresholds (pounds/day) -- -- 137 -- -- -- -- 7 -- -- Maximum Daily Emissions-Year 20233 2.91 29.4 32.31 28.1 1.34 3.4 4.74 1.23 1.76 2.99 Exceed SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No -- -- -- -- No -- -- Maximum Daily Emissions-Year 20244 11.53 19.92 31.45 24.25 0.895 0.03 0.925 0.85 0 0.85 Exceed SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No -- -- -- -- No -- --

1. Emissions were quantified using the CalEEMod, v2022.1.1.2., computer program.

2. Includes the use of low-VOC content paint (50 g/L, or less)

3. Maximum daily emissions of 2023 assumes some activities (e.g., Clearing and Site Prep) could potentially occur simultaneously on any given day.

4. Maximum daily emissions of 2024 assumes some activities (e.g., building construction, paving, architectural coating application) could potentially occur simultaneously on any given day. lbs/day = pounds per day; ROG =Reactive Organic Gases; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = respirable particulate matter (10 micrometers or less) Refer to Appendix B for emissions modeling assumptions and results.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
19 Table 11. Quarterly Construction Emissions Without Mitigation Quarter
Maximum Quarterly Emissions (tons)1
ROG NOx ROG+NOX
PM102 PM2.5
Exhaust Dust Total Exhaust Dust Total
Year 2023 - Quarter 3 0.01 0.16 0.17 <0.01 0.02 0.03 <0.01 0.01 0.01 Year 2023 - Quarter 4 0.01 0.16 0.17 <0.01 0.02 0.03 <0.01 0.01 0.01 Year 2024 - Quarter 1 0.02 0.16 0.18 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Year 2024 - Quarter 2 0.02 0.16 0.18 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Year 2024 - Quarter 3 0.02 0.16 0.18 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Year 2024 - Quarter 4 0.02 0.16 0.18 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 SLOAPCD Quarterly Tier 1/Tier 2
Thresholds (tons/quarter) -- -- 2.5/6.3 -- 2.5/None -- 0.13/None -- -- Maximum Quarterly Emissions: 0.02 0.16 0.18 <0.01 0.02 0.03 <0.01 0.01 0.01 Exceed SLOAPCD Tier 1/Tier 2 Thresholds? -- -- No/No -- No/-- -- No/-- -- -- Maximum Quarterly Emissions: Based on construction schedule information provided and default assumptions contained in the CalEEMod computer model. Emissions were compared to SLOAPCD thresholds. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Refer to Appendix B for modeling assumptions and results.

1. Maximum quarterly emissions include on-site and off-site emissions Table 12. Summary of Construction Emissions without Mitigation Criteria Project Emissions
(lbs/day) SLOAPCD Significance Threshold
Exceeds
Significance
Threshold?
Maximum Daily Emissions of ROG+NOX 32.31 137 lbs/day No Maximum Daily Emissions of PM2.5 Exhaust 1.23 7 lbs/day No (tons/quarter) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 2
Maximum Quarterly Emissions of ROG+NOX 0.18 2.5 tons/quarter 6.3 tons/quarter No No Maximum Quarterly Emissions of PM10 Dust 0.02 2.5 tons/quarter None No No Maximum Quarterly Emissions of PM2.5 Exhaust <0.01 0.13 tons/quarter 0.32 tons/quarter No No Refer to Appendix B for modeling assumptions and results.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
20 Maximum daily and quarterly construction emissions would not exceed SLOAPCD’s daily or quarterly significance thresholds. Emissions would be largely a result of mobile-source emissions associated with construction vehicle and equipment operations anticipated to occur during the grading. However, if uncontrolled, fugitive dust generated during construction may result in localized pollutant concentrations that could exceed ambient air quality standards and result in increased nuisance concerns to nearby land uses. For this reason, construction-generated emissions would be considered to have a potentially significant impact.

Mitigation Measures
AQ-1: The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce construction generated fugitive dust. These measures shall be shown on grading and building plans. a. Reduce the amount of disturbed area where possible.
b. Use water trucks, SLOAPCD-approved dust suppressants (see Section 4.3 in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook), or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site and from exceeding the District’s limit of 20% opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60- minute period. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. Please note that since water use is a concern due to drought conditions, the contractor or builder shall consider the use of an APCD-approved dust suppressant where possible to reduce the amount of water used for dust control. For a list of suppressants, see Section 4.3 of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
c. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily or covered with tarps or other dust barriers as needed.
d. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible.

In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
e. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between the top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114.
f. “Track-Out” is defined as sand or soil that adheres to and/or agglomerates on the exterior surfaces of motor vehicles and/or equipment (including tires) that may then fall onto any highway or street as described in CVC Section 23113 and California Water Code 13304. To prevent ‘track out’, designate access points and require all employees, subcontractors, and others to use them. Install and operate a ‘track-out prevention device’ where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved streets. The ‘track-out prevention device’ can be any device or combination of devices that are effective at preventing track out, located at the point of intersection of an unpaved area and a paved road. Rumble strips or steel plate devices need periodic cleaning to be effective. If paved roadways accumulate tracked out soils, the trackout prevention device may need to be modified. g. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.
h. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established.
i. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the SLOAPCD. j. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site.
k. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads.

Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where possible. Roads shall be pre-wetted prior to sweeping when possible.
l. The burning of vegetative material shall be prohibited. Effective February 25, 2000, the APCD prohibited developmental burning of vegetative material within San Luis Obispo County. If you Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
21 have any questions regarding these requirements, contact the SLOAPCD Engineering & Compliance Division at (805) 781-5912.
m. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and enhance the implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions below 20% opacity, and to prevent the transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress.

The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the SLOAPCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork or demolition.

AQ-2: The following measures shall be implemented to reduce construction emissions from on and off-road construction equipment (NOx, ROG, and DPM) and area sources. These measures shall be shown on grading and building plans:
a. Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications. b. Heavy-duty (50 horsepower or greater) diesel-fueled construction equipment shall meet, at a minimum, ARB's Tier 3 certified engines, or cleaner, off-road heavy-duty diesel engines; be fitted with diesel exhaust particulate filters in accordance with manufacturer recommendations; and, comply with the State Off-Road Regulation. Heavy-duty equipment with Tier 4 engines shall be used to the extent locally available. Where Tier 3, or cleaner, equipment is not available, incorporate diesel emission control strategies/retrofits, such that emission reductions achieved equal or exceed that of a Tier 3 engine. Installing California Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategies. Verified diesel emissions control strategies can be found at:
arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/vt/cvt.htm.
c. When applicable, portable equipment, 50 horsepower (hp) or greater, used during construction activities shall be registered with the California statewide portable equipment registration program (issued by the California Air Resources Board) or be permitted by the APCD. Such equipment may include power screens, conveyors, internal combustion engines, crushers, portable generators, tub grinders, trammel screens, and portable plants (e.g., aggregate plant, asphalt plant, concrete plant). For more information, contact the SLOAPCD Engineering & Compliance Division at (805) 781-5912.
d. Use on-road heavy-duty trucks that meet the ARB’s 2007 or cleaner certification standard for onroad heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State On-Road Regulation. e. All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle when not in use. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5-minute idling limit.
f. Construction equipment staging areas shall be located at the furthest distance possible from nearby sensitive land uses.
g. To the extent locally available, electrified or alternatively powered construction equipment shall be used.
h. Construction of the proposed project shall use low-VOC content paints (e.g., 50 grams VOC per liter, or less).
i. To the extent locally available, use prefinished building materials or materials that do not require the application of architectural coatings.
j. Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for reducing cement use in concrete mix as allowed by local ordinance and conditions.

Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 include SLOAPCD-recommended standard and best available control measures to reduce construction-generated emissions of fugitive dust, mobile-source emissions associated with construction vehicles and equipment, and evaporative emissions from architectural coasting (e.g. low VOC-emission paint). Mitigated daily and annual emissions are summarized in Table 13, respectively. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
22 Long-term Operational Emissions
Long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed project would be predominantly associated with mobile sources and area sources, such as landscape maintenance activities. To a lesser extent, emissions associated with use of electricity and natural gas would also contribute to increased operational emissions.

Unmitigated operational emissions associated with the proposed project are summarized in Table 13. As depicted, daily operational emission from non-permitted sources would total approximately 8.3 lbs/day of ROG+NOx, 13.6 lbs/day of CO, 0.4 lbs/day of fugitive PM10, and <0.1 lbs/day of exhaust PM2.5.

Table 13. Operational Emissions Without Mitigation
Operational Period/Source
Emissions1
ROG NOX ROG+NOX CO
PM10 PM2.5
Exhaust Dust Total Exhaust Dust Total
Daily Emissions (lbs/day)
Mobile2 1.2 0.9 2.1 6.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1
Energy Source <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Area Source 6.2 0.1 6.2 7.7 <0.1 0.0 <0.1 <0.1 0.0 <0.1 Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Waste 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Refrigerant 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds6 -- -- 25 550 -- 25 -- 1.25 -- -- Total Project Emissions: 7.4 0.9 8.3 13.6 0.0 0.4 0.4 <0.1 0.1 0.1 Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No No -- No -- No -- -- Annual Emissions (tons/year)
Total Project Emissions 1.3 0.2 1.5 2.4 <0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds -- -- 25 -- 25 -- -- -- -- -- Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No -- No -- -- -- -- -- Note: Based on operational year of 2024. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Refer to Appendix B for modeling output files and assumptions.

1. Daily emissions are based on the worst case between summer and winter buildout operational condition.

2. Mobile emissions were based on trip-generation rates derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project and CalEEMod default fleet mix and trip distances.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
23 Health Effects of Project-Generated Regional Emissions Project-generated emissions are evaluated based on the pollutants potential to affect local or regional air quality. As noted earlier in this report, regional pollutants of concern typically include ozone and particulate matter. Whereas, for development project, localized pollutants of primary concern often include carbon monoxide, toxic air contaminants, as well as, airborne particulates. The health effects of these pollutants are discussed earlier in this report and summarized in Table 1.

For localized pollutants, health impacts can be evaluated using screening criteria or through dispersion modeling. However, for regional pollutants such as ozone, the change in health effects associated with an individual project is a secondary pollutant created by NOX and ROG (also commonly referred to as VOCs).

As previously discussed earlier in this report, ozone is not a directly emitted pollutant. NOX and ROG are not criteria air pollutants but, when in the presence of sunlight, they can form ozone and also contribute to the formation of secondary PM2.5. Because ozone is not a directly emitted pollutant and is created under specific meteorological conditions over a wide transport area, ozone concentrations are typically evaluated at a regional level using complex photochemical models. These models are capable of predicting concentrations that take into account variations amounts of precursor emissions (e.g., ROG, NOX), temperature, inversions, sunlight, hourly variations, ambient conditions, and wind flow over long distances (e.g., miles). At the project level of analysis, evaluation of ozone concentrations is “not practicable and not likely [to] yield valid information” (SJVAPCD 2015).

Of the criteria pollutants identified, ozone and PM2.5 have the most critical health effects. As a result, concentrations of these pollutants are typically relied upon for determining public health effects. In comparison to modeled regional emissions, the emissions associated with most individual projects would be negligible and too small to produce a measurable change in regional ozone or PM2.5 concentrations or associated public health effects. In addition, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) has recently conducted regional emissions modeling analyses using a chemical transport model to evaluate changes in emissions and associated health effects associated with an individual project. The modeling was based on very conservative assumptions representative of the largest projects, which assumed up to approximately eight times the threshold of significance (up to 656 lbs/day) of NOX, ROG and PM. This level of emissions would be more representative of large community plan projects. Based on the modeling conducted by SMAQMD, even these large projects would have “low overall health effects” (SMAQMD 2020).

It is important to reiterate that the health effects of criteria air pollutants are taken into consideration when the U.S, EPA establishes the NAAQS for individual pollutants. The health effects of a particular pollutant are analyzed on a regional basis based on the areas attainment of the NAAQS. As previously discussed in this report, the AQI is one common method of evaluating public health impacts for criteria air pollutants of primary concern. Local air districts establish significance thresholds that are based on evaluation of an individual project’s contribution to reginal air quality conditions and associated health effects. Based on the above discussion and given that project-generated criteria pollutants would not exceed applicable significance thresholds, project-generated emissions of regional criteria pollutants (e.g., ROG, NOX, PM) would have a minimal effect on public health. In addition, refer to Impact AQ-C for a discussion of localized air quality impacts.

Mitigation Measures
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
24 AQ-3: The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce the operational emissions generated by the project:
a. The installation of wood burning or natural-gas fired hearths and appliances shall be prohibited. b. In accordance with ARB’s Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, Heavy-duty diesel-fueled truck idle time shall be limited to 5-minutes/truck when not in use. Signage shall be posted at loading areas to advise drivers of this requirement. c. Reduce fugitive dust from roads and parking areas with the use of paving or other materials. d. Implement driveway design standards (e.g., speed bumps, curved driveway) for selfenforcement of reduced speed limits on unpaved driveways. e. Exceed Cal Green standards by 25 percent for providing on-site bicycle parking: both short-term racks and long-term lockers, or a locked room with standard racks and access limited to bicyclists only.
f. Exceed applicable building standards at the time of development for building energy efficiency with a goal of achieving zero net energy (ZNE) buildings. g. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for utilizing recycled content materials. h. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for the use of greywater, rainwater, or recycled water where applicable/available.
i. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for using shading, trees, plants, cool roofs, etc. to reduce "heat island" effect.
j. Exceed Cal Green building standards at the time of development for water conservation (e.g. use of low flow water fixtures, water efficient irrigation systems, and draught tolerant landscaping.)
k. All built-in appliances shall be Energy Star certified or equivalent. l. To the extent available, use paints and cleaning products that are low-VOC content (e.g., 50 grams/liter VOC content, or less).
m. Utilize on-site renewable energy system (e.g. solar, wind, geothermal, biomass and/or bio-gas) to offset the entire electricity use of the project.

Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-3 includes SLOAPCD-recommended measures to reduce operational-generated emissions. Mitigated operational emissions are summarized in Table 14. With mitigation, operational emissions of ROG+NOX would not exceed SLOAPCD significance thresholds. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
25 Table 14. Operational Emissions With Mitigation
Operational Period/Source
Emissions1
ROG NOX ROG+NOX CO
PM10 PM2.5
Exhaust Dust Total Exhaust Dust Total
Daily Emissions (lbs/day)
Mobile2 1.2 0.9 2.1 6.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1
Energy Source 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Area Source 5.0 0.1 5.0 7.7 <0.1 0.0 <0.1 <0.1 0.0 <0.1 Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Waste 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Refrigerant 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds6 -- -- 25 550 -- 25 -- 1.25 -- -- Total Project Emissions: 7.4 0.9 8.3 13.6 0.0 0.4 0.4 <0.1 0.1 0.1 Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No No -- No -- No -- -- Annual Emissions (tons/year)
Total Project Emissions 1.1 0.2 1.3 2.4 <0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds -- -- 25 -- 25 -- -- -- -- -- Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No -- No -- -- -- -- -- Note: Based on operational year of 2024. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Refer to Appendix B for modeling output files and assumptions.

1. Daily emissions are based on the worst case between summer and winter buildout operational condition.

2. Mobile emissions were based on trip-generation rates derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project and CalEEMod default fleet mix and trip distances.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
26 Impact AQ-C. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The proposed project would result in localized increases of pollutant concentrations during project construction and long-term operation. The proposed project’s potential contribution to localized air pollutants is discussed, as follows:

Short-Term Construction Activities
Naturally-Occurring Asbestos
Naturally-occurring asbestos (NOA) has been identified as a toxic air contaminant by the ARB. In accordance with ARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM), prior to any grading activities, a geologic evaluation should be conducted to determine if NOA is present within the area that will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, an exemption request form, along with a copy of the geologic report, must be filed with the SLOAPCD. If NOA is found at the site, the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM.

Based on a review of the SLOAPCD’s map depicting potential areas of NOA, the project site is not located in or near an area that has been identified as having a potential for NOA. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Localized Construction PM Concentrations
Fugitive dust emissions would be primarily associated with building demolition, site preparation, grading, and vehicle travel on unpaved and paved surfaces. On-site off-road equipment and trucks would also result in short-term emissions of diesel-exhaust PM, which could contribute to elevated localized concentration at nearby receptors. Uncontrolled emissions of fugitive dust may also contribute to potential increases in nuisance impacts to nearby receptors. Short-term exposure to airborne particulates can result in irritation of eyes and the respiratory system and may affect sensitive individuals, including those suffering from asthma and other medical conditions. For these reasons, localized uncontrolled concentrations of constructiongenerated PM would be considered to have a potentially significant impact.

Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-2.

Significance After Mitigation
With the implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 through AQ-2 construction-related emissions, including fugitive dust, would be substantially reduced. With mitigation, short-term exposure to localized pollutants would be considered to have a less-than-significant impact.

Impact AQ-D. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
The occurrence and severity of odor impacts depend on numerous factors, including the nature, frequency, and intensity of the source; wind speed and direction; and the sensitivity of the receptors. While offensive odors rarely cause any physical harm, they still can be very unpleasant, leading to considerable distress among the public and often generating citizen complaints to local governments and regulatory agencies.

Projects with the potential to frequently expose members of the public to objectionable odors would be deemed to have a significant impact.

The proposed project would not result in the installation of any equipment or processes that would be considered major odor-emission sources. In addition, no known odor sources are within one mile of the project site. However, construction of the proposed project would involve the use of a variety of gasoline or diesel-powered equipment that would emit exhaust fumes. Exhaust fumes, particularly diesel-exhaust, may be considered objectionable by some people. In addition, pavement coatings and architectural coatings Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
27 used during project construction would also emit temporary odors. However, construction-generated emissions would occur intermittently throughout the workday and would dissipate rapidly with increasing distance from the source. Mitigation measures, such as implementation of idling restrictions for construction equipment and vehicles and use of newer, cleaner equipment and vehicles would further reduce construction-generated emissions. For these reasons, short-term construction activities would not expose a substantial number of people to frequent odorous emissions. For these reasons, potential exposure of sensitive receptors to odorous emissions would be considered less than significant.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
28 GREENHOUSE GASES AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Existing Setting
To fully understand global climate change, it is important to recognize the naturally occurring “greenhouse effect” and to define the greenhouse gases (GHGs) that contribute to this phenomenon. Various gases in the earth’s atmosphere, classified as atmospheric GHGs, play a critical role in determining the earth’s surface temperature. Solar radiation enters the earth’s atmosphere from space and a portion of the radiation is absorbed by the earth’s surface. The earth emits this radiation back toward space, but the properties of the radiation change from high-frequency solar radiation to lower-frequency infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases, which are transparent to solar radiation, are effective in absorbing infrared radiation. As a result, this radiation that otherwise would have escaped back into space is now retained, resulting in a warming of the atmosphere. This phenomenon is known as the greenhouse effect. Among the prominent GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. Primary GHGs attributed to global climate change, are discussed, as follows:
• Carbon Dioxide. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a colorless, odorless gas. CO2 is emitted in a number of ways, both naturally and through human activities. The largest source of CO2 emissions globally is the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas in power plants, automobiles, industrial facilities, and other sources. A number of specialized industrial production processes and product uses such as mineral production, metal production, and the use of petroleum-based products can also lead to CO2 emissions. The atmospheric lifetime of CO2 is variable because it is so readily exchanged in the atmosphere (U.S. EPA 2018).
• Methane. Methane (CH4) is a colorless, odorless gas that is not flammable under most circumstances.

CH4 is the major component of natural gas, about 87 percent by volume. It is also formed and released to the atmosphere by biological processes occurring in anaerobic environments. Methane is emitted from a variety of both human-related and natural sources. Human-related sources include fossil fuel production, animal husbandry (enteric fermentation in livestock and manure management), rice cultivation, biomass burning, and waste management. These activities release significant quantities of methane to the atmosphere. Natural sources of methane include wetlands, gas hydrates, permafrost, termites, oceans, freshwater bodies, non-wetland soils, and other sources such as wildfires. Methane’s atmospheric lifetime is about 12 years (U.S. EPA 2018). • Nitrous Oxide. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a clear, colorless gas with a slightly sweet odor. N2O is produced by both natural and human-related sources. Primary human-related sources of N2O are agricultural soil management, animal manure management, sewage treatment, mobile and stationary combustion of fossil fuels, acid production, and nitric acid production. N2O is also produced naturally from a wide variety of biological sources in soil and water, particularly microbial action in wet tropical forests. The atmospheric lifetime of N2O is approximately 114 years (U.S. EPA 2018). • Hydrofluorocarbons. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are man-made chemicals, many of which have been developed as alternatives to ozone-depleting substances for industrial, commercial, and consumer products. The only significant emissions of HFCs before 1990 were of the chemical HFC-23, which is generated as a byproduct of the production of HCFC-22 (or Freon 22, used in air conditioning applications). The atmospheric lifetime for HFCs varies from just over a year for HFC152a to 270 years for HFC-23. Most of the commercially used HFCs have atmospheric lifetimes of less than 15 years (e.g., HFC-134a, which is used in automobile air conditioning and refrigeration, has an atmospheric life of 14 years) (U.S. EPA 2018).
• Perfluorocarbons. Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) are colorless, highly dense, chemically inert, and nontoxic. There are seven PFC gases: perfluoromethane (CF4), perfluoroethane (C2F6), perfluoropropane (C3F8), perfluorobutane (C4F10), perfluorocyclobutane (C4F8), perfluoropentane (C5F12), and perfluorohexane (C6F14). Natural geological emissions have been responsible for the PFCs that have accumulated in the atmosphere in the past; however, the largest current source is aluminum production, which releases CF4 and C2F6 as byproducts. The estimated atmospheric lifetimes for PFCs ranges from 2,600 to 50,000 years (U.S. EPA 2018).

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
29 • Nitrogen Trifluoride. Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) is an inorganic, colorless, odorless, toxic, nonflammable gas used as an etchant in microelectronics. Nitrogen trifluoride is predominantly employed in the cleaning of the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition chambers in the production of liquid crystal displays and silicon-based thin-film solar cells. It has a global warming potential of 16,100 carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). While NF3 may have a lower global warming potential than other chemical etchants, it is still a potent GHG. In 2009, NF3 was listed by California as a high global warming potential GHG to be listed and regulated under Assembly Bill (AB) 32 (Section 38505 Health and Safety Code).
• Sulfur Hexafluoride. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic compound that is colorless, odorless, nontoxic, and generally non-flammable. SF6 is primarily used as an electrical insulator in high voltage equipment. The electric power industry uses roughly 80 percent of all SF6 produced worldwide. Leaks of SF6 occur from aging equipment and during equipment maintenance and servicing. SF6 has an atmospheric life of 3,200 years (U.S. EPA 2018).
• Black Carbon. Black carbon is the strongest light-absorbing component of particulate matter (PM) emitted from burning fuels such as coal, diesel, and biomass. Black carbon contributes to climate change both directly by absorbing sunlight and indirectly by depositing on snow and by interacting with clouds and affecting cloud formation. Black carbon is considered a short-lived species, which can vary spatially and, consequently, it is very difficult to quantify associated global-warming potentials. The main sources of black carbon in California are wildfires, off-road vehicles (locomotives, marine vessels, tractors, excavators, dozers, etc.), on-road vehicles (cars, trucks, and buses), fireplaces, agricultural waste burning, and prescribed burning (planned burns of forest or wildlands) (CCAC 2018, U.S. EPA 2018).

Each GHG differs in its ability to absorb heat in the atmosphere based on the lifetime, or persistence, of the gas molecule in the atmosphere. Often, estimates of GHG emissions are presented in CO2e, which weight each gas by its global warming potential (GWP). Expressing GHG emissions in CO2e takes the contribution of all GHG emissions to the greenhouse effect and converts them to a single unit equivalent to the effect that would occur if only CO2 were being emitted. Table 15 provides a summary of the GWP for GHG emissions of typical concern with regard to community development projects, based on a 100-year time horizon. As indicated, Methane traps over 25 times more heat per molecule than CO2, and N2O absorbs roughly 298 times more heat per molecule than CO2. Additional GHG with high GWP includes Nitrogen trifluoride, Sulfur hexafluoride, Perfluorocarbons, and black carbon.

Table 15. Global Warming Potential for Greenhouse Gases Greenhouse Gas Global Warming Potential (100-year)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 1
Methane (CH4) 25
Nitrous Dioxide (N2O) 298
Based on IPCC GWP values for 100-year time horizon.

Source: IPCC 2007
Statewide GHG Emissions
In 2019, GHG emissions within California totaled 418.1 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2e. GHG emissions, by sector, are summarized in Figure 3. Within California, the transportation sector is the largest contributor, accounting for approximately 39.7 percent of the total state-wide GHG emissions. Emissions associated with industrial uses are the second-largest contributor, totaling roughly 21.1 percent. Electricity generation totaled roughly 14.1 percent. Other major emission sources included commercial uses, residential uses, agriculture, refrigerants, and waste (ARB 2022).

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
30 Figure 3. California GHG Emissions Inventory by Sector & Subsector (2019) Source: ARB 2022
City of Paso Robles GHG Emissions Inventories
The City has completed a community-wide inventory of GHG emissions for years 2005 and 2012, which are summarized in Table 16. As shown, a majority of the City’s emissions are associated with mobile sources.

Remaining GHG emissions are predominantly associated with energy use and solid waste generation. In comparison to year 2005 community-wide emissions, year 2016 emissions decreased by a total of approximately 12 percent (City of Paso Robles 2013).

Table 16. City of Paso Robles GHG Emissions Inventories Sector Year 2005
(MTCO2e)
Year 2020
(MTCO2e)
Percent Change from
2005 to 2020
Residential 40,188 46,828 17%
Commercial/Industrial 33,536 30,551 -9%
Transportation 67,801 92,913 37%
Off-Road 13,205 15,878 20%
Solid Waste 13,343 16,653 17%
Wastewater 70 82 17%
Aircraft 1,324 1,543 17%
Total 169,557 203,448 20%
Source: City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan 2013
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
31 Short-Lived Climate Pollutants
Short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs), such as black carbon, fluorinated gases, and methane also have a dramatic effect on climate change. Though short-lived, these pollutants create a warming influence on the climate that is many times more potent than that of carbon dioxide.

As part of the ARB’s efforts to address SLCPs, the ARB has developed a statewide emission inventory for black carbon. The black carbon inventory will help support the implementation of the SLCP Strategy, but it is not part of the State’s GHG Inventory that tracks progress towards the State’s climate targets. The most recent inventory for year 2013 conditions is depicted in Figure 4. As depicted, off-road mobile sources account for a majority of black carbon emissions totaling roughly 36 percent of the inventory. Other major anthropogenic sources of black carbon include on-road transportation, residential wood burning, fuel combustion, and industrial processes (ARB 2020).

Figure 4. California Black Carbon Emissions Inventory (Year 2013) Source: ARB 2020
Effects of Global Climate Change
There are uncertainties as to exactly what the climate changes will be in various local areas of the earth.

There are also uncertainties associated with the magnitude and timing of other consequences of a warmer planet: sea-level rise, spread of certain diseases out of their usual geographic range, the effect on agricultural production, water supply, sustainability of ecosystems, increased strength and frequency of storms, extreme heat events, increased air pollution episodes, and the consequence of these effects on the economy.

Within California, climate changes would likely alter the ecological characteristics of many ecosystems throughout the state. Such alterations would likely include increases in surface temperatures and changes in the form, timing, and intensity of precipitation. For instance, historical records are depicting an increasing trend toward earlier snowmelt in the Sierra Nevada. This snowpack is a principal supply of water for the state, providing roughly 50 percent of the state’s annual runoff. If this trend continues, some areas of the state may experience an increased danger of floods during the winter months and possible exhaustion of the snowpack during spring and summer months. Earlier snowmelt would also impact the State’s energy resources.

Currently, approximately 20 percent of California's electricity comes from hydropower. Early exhaustion of the Sierra snowpack may force electricity producers to switch to more costly or non-renewable forms of electricity generation during spring and summer months. A changing climate may also impact agricultural crop yields, coastal structures, and biodiversity. As a result, changes in climate will likely have detrimental effects on some of California’s largest industries, including agriculture, wine, tourism, skiing, recreational and commercial fishing, and forestry.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
32 Regulatory Framework
Federal
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13514
Executive Order 13514 is focused on reducing GHGs internally in federal agency missions, programs, and operations. In addition, the executive order directs federal agencies to participate in the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, which is engaged in developing a national strategy for adaptation to climate change.

On April 2, 2007, in Massachusetts v. U.S. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), the Supreme Court found that GHGs are air pollutants covered by the FCAA and that the U.S. EPA has the authority to regulate GHG. The Court held that the U.S. EPA Administrator must determine whether or not emissions of GHGs from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, or whether the science is too uncertain to make a reasoned decision.

On December 7, 2009, the U.S. EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings regarding GHGs under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act:
• Endangerment Finding: The Administrator found that the current and projected concentrations of the six key well-mixed GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6) in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. • Cause or Contribute Finding: The Administrator found that the combined emissions of these wellmixed GHGs from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare.

Although these findings did not themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities, this action was a prerequisite to finalizing the U.S. EPA’s Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Light-Duty Vehicles, which was published on September 15, 2009. On May 7, 2010, the final Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards was published in the Federal Register.

The U.S. EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are taking coordinated steps to enable the production of a new generation of clean vehicles with reduced GHG emissions and improved fuel efficiency from on-road vehicles and engines. These next steps include developing the first-ever GHG regulations for heavy-duty engines and vehicles, as well as additional light-duty vehicle GHG regulations.

These steps were outlined by President Obama in a Presidential Memorandum on May 21, 2010.

The final combined U.S. EPA and NHTSA standards that make up the first phase of this national program apply to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. The standards require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of CO2 per mile (the equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon if the automobile industry were to meet this CO2 level solely through fuel economy improvements). Together, these standards will cut GHG emissions by an estimated 960 MMT and 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program (model years 2012-2016). On August 28, 2012, U.S. EPA and NHTSA issued their joint rule to extend this national program of coordinated GHG and fuel economy standards to model years 2017 through 2025 passenger vehicles.

State
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. S-3-05
Executive Order S-3-05 (State of California) proclaims that California is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. It declares that increased temperatures could reduce the Sierra’s snowpack, further exacerbate California’s air quality problems, and potentially cause a rise in sea levels. To combat those concerns, the Executive Order established total GHG emission targets. Specifically, emissions are to be reduced to the 2000 level by 2010, to the 1990 level by 2020, and to 80 percent below the 1990 level by 2050.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
33 The Executive Order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to coordinate a multi-agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. The secretary will also submit biannual reports to the governor and state legislature describing (1) progress made toward reaching the emission targets, (2) impacts of global warming on California’s resources, and (3) mitigation and adaptation plans to combat these impacts. To comply with the Executive Order, the secretary of CalEPA created a Climate Action Team made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The Climate Action Team released its first report in March 2006 and continues to release periodic reports on progress. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on voluntary actions of California businesses, local government, and community actions, as well as through state incentive and regulatory programs.

ASSEMBLY BILL 32 - CALIFORNIA GLOBAL WARMING SOLUTIONS ACT OF 2006 AB 32 (Health and Safety Code Sections 38500, 38501, 28510, 38530, 38550, 38560, 38561–38565, 38570, 38571, 38574, 38580, 38590, 38592–38599) requires that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. The gases that are regulated by AB 32 include CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, NF3, and SF6. The reduction to 1990 levels will be accomplished through an enforceable statewide cap on GHG emissions that will be phased in starting in 2012. To effectively implement the cap, AB 32 directs ARB to develop and implement regulations to reduce statewide GHG emissions from stationary sources. AB 32 specifies that regulations adopted in response to AB 1493 should be used to address GHG emissions from vehicles.

However, AB 32 also includes language stating that if the AB 1493 regulations cannot be implemented, then ARB should develop new regulations to control vehicle GHG emissions under the authorization of AB 32.

AB 32 requires that ARB adopt a quantified cap on GHG emissions representing 1990 emissions levels and disclose how it arrives at the cap, institute a schedule to meet the emissions cap, and develop tracking, reporting, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that the state achieves reductions in GHG emissions necessary to meet the cap. AB 32 also includes guidance to institute emissions reductions in an economically efficient manner and conditions to ensure that businesses and consumers are not unfairly affected by the reductions.

CLIMATE CHANGE SCOPING PLAN
In October 2008, ARB published its Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan, which is the State’s plan to achieve GHG reductions in California required by AB 32. This initial Scoping Plan contained the main strategies to be implemented in order to achieve the target emission levels identified in AB 32. The Scoping Plan included ARB-recommended GHG reductions for each emissions sector of the state’s GHG inventory.

The largest proposed GHG reduction recommendations were associated with improving emissions standards for light-duty vehicles, implementing the Low Carbon Fuel Standard program, implementation of energy efficiency measures in buildings and appliances, and the widespread development of combined heat and power systems, and developing a renewable portfolio standard for electricity production.

The Scoping Plan states that land use planning and urban growth decisions will play important roles in the state’s GHG reductions because local governments have primary authority to plan, zone, approve, and permit how land is developed to accommodate population growth and the changing needs of their jurisdictions. ARB further acknowledges that decisions on how land is used will have large impacts on the GHG emissions that will result from the transportation, housing, industry, forestry, water, agriculture, electricity, and natural gas emissions sectors. With regard to land use planning, the Scoping Plan expects approximately

5.0 MMT CO2e will be achieved associated with the implementation of Senate Bill 375, which is discussed further below.

The initial Scoping Plan was first approved by ARB on December 11, 2008, and is updated every five years.

The first update of the Scoping Plan was approved by the ARB on May 22, 2014, which looked past 2020 to set mid-term goals (2030-2035) on the road to reaching the 2050 goals., The most recent update released by ARB is the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, which was released on November 2017. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan incorporates strategies for achieving the 2030 GHG-reduction target established in SB 32 and EO B-30-15. Most notably, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan encourages zero net increases in GHG emissions. However, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan recognizes that achieving net zero increases in GHG emissions may not be possible or appropriate for all projects and that the inability of a project to mitigate its GHG emissions to zero would not imply the project results in a substantial contribution to the cumulatively significant environmental impact of climate change under CEQA.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
34 The 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan update is currently being prepared. The 2022 Scoping Plan Update will assess progress towards achieving the SB 32 year 2030 target and will lay out a path to achieve carbon neutrality by mid-century.

SENATE BILL 1078 AND GOVERNOR’S ORDER S-14-08
Senate Bill 1078 (Public Utilities Code Sections 387, 390.1, 399.25 and Article 16) addresses electricity supply and requires that retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned utilities and community choice aggregators, provide a minimum 20 percent of their supply from renewable sources by 2017. This Senate Bill will affect statewide GHG emissions associated with electricity generation. In 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-14-08, which set the Renewables Portfolio Standard target to 33 percent by 2020. It directed state government agencies and retail sellers of electricity to take all appropriate actions to implement this target. Executive Order S-14-08 was later superseded by Executive Order S-21-09 on September 15, 2009. Executive Order S-21-09 directed the ARB to adopt regulations requiring 33 percent of electricity sold in the State come from renewable energy by 2020. Statute SB X1-2 superseded this Executive Order in 2011, which obligated all California electricity providers, including investor-owned utilities and publicly owned utilities, to obtain at least 33 percent of their energy from renewable electrical generation facilities by 2020.

ARB is required by current law, AB 32 of 2006, to regulate sources of GHGs to meet a state goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and an 80 percent reduction of 1990 levels by 2050. The California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission serve in advisory roles to help ARB develop the regulations to administer the 33 percent by 2020 requirement. ARB is also authorized to increase the target and accelerate and expand the time frame.

MANDATORY REPORTING OF GHG EMISSIONS
The California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32, 2006) requires the reporting of GHGs by major sources to the ARB. Major sources required to report GHG emissions include industrial facilities, suppliers of transportation fuels, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied petroleum gas, and carbon dioxide, operators of petroleum and natural gas systems, and electricity retail providers and marketers.

CAP-AND-TRADE REGULATION
The cap-and-trade regulation is a key element in California’s climate plan. It sets a statewide limit on sources responsible for 85 percent of California’s GHG emissions and establishes a price signal needed to drive longterm investment in cleaner fuels and more efficient use of energy. The cap-and-trade rules came into effect on January 1, 2013, and apply to large electric power plants and large industrial plants. In 2015, fuel distributors, including distributors of heating and transportation fuels, also became subject to the cap-andtrade rules. At that stage, the program will encompass around 360 businesses throughout California and nearly 85 percent of the state’s total GHG emissions.

Under the cap-and-trade regulation, companies must hold enough emission allowances to cover their emissions and are free to buy and sell allowances on the open market. California held its first auction of GHG allowances on November 14, 2012. California’s GHG cap-and-trade system is projected to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 and would achieve an approximate 80 percent reduction from 1990 levels by 2050.

SENATE BILL 32
SB 32 was signed by Governor Brown on September 8, 2016. SB 32 effectively extends California’s GHG emission-reduction goals from year 2020 to year 2030. This new emission-reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is intended to promote further GHG-reductions in support of the State’s ultimate goal of reducing GHG emissions by 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. SB 32 also directs the ARB to update the Climate Change Scoping Plan to address this interim 2030 emission-reduction target.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
35 SENATE BILL 97
Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was enacted in 2007. SB 97 required OPR to develop, and the Natural Resources Agency to adopt, amendments to the CEQA Guidelines addressing the analysis and mitigation of GHG emissions.

Those CEQA Guidelines amendments clarified several points, including the following:
• Lead agencies must analyze the GHG emissions of proposed projects and must reach a conclusion regarding the significance of those emissions.
• When a project’s GHG emissions may be significant, lead agencies must consider a range of potential mitigation measures to reduce those emissions. • Lead agencies must analyze potentially significant impacts associated with placing projects in hazardous locations, including locations potentially affected by climate change. • Lead agencies may significantly streamline the analysis of GHGs on a project level by using a programmatic GHG emissions reduction plan meeting certain criteria. • CEQA mandates analysis of a proposed project’s potential energy use (including transportationrelated energy), sources of energy supply and ways to reduce energy demand, including through the use of efficient transportation alternatives.

As part of the administrative rulemaking process, the California Natural Resources Agency developed a Final Statement of Reasons explaining the legal and factual bases, intent, and purpose of the CEQA Guidelines amendments. The amendments to the CEQA Guidelines implementing SB 97 became effective on March 18, 2010.

SENATE BILL 100
Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) was signed by Governor Jerry Brown on September 10, 2018. SB 100 sets a goal of phasing out all fossil fuels from the state’s electricity sector by 2045. SB 100 increases to 60 percent, from 50 percent, how much of California’s electricity portfolio must come from renewables by 2030. It establishes a further goal to have an electric grid that is entirely powered by clean energy by 2045, which could include other carbon-free sources, like nuclear power, that are not renewable.

SENATE BILL 375
SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or alternative planning strategy (APS) that will address land-use allocation in that MPOs regional transportation plan. ARB, in consultation with MPOs, establishes regional reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. ARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO’s SCS or APS for consistency with its assigned targets. If MPOs do not meet the GHG reduction targets, funding for transportation projects may be withheld. In 2018, ARB adopted updated SB 375 targets.

CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
The California Building Code (CBC) contains standards that regulate the method of use, properties, performance, or types of materials used in the construction, alteration, improvement, repair, or rehabilitation of a building or other improvement to real property. The California Building Code is adopted every three years by the Building Standards Commission (BSC). In the interim, the BSC also adopts annual updates to make necessary mid-term corrections. The CBC standards apply statewide; however, a local jurisdiction may amend a CBC standard if it makes a finding that the amendment is reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions.

CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
In essence, green buildings standards are indistinguishable from any other building standards, are contained in the CBC, and regulate the construction of new buildings and improvements. Whereas the focus of traditional building standards has been protecting public health and safety, the focus of green building standards is to improve environmental performance.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
36 The 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (2019 Standards), adopted in May 2018, addressed four key areas: smart residential photovoltaic systems, updated thermal envelope standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to the exterior and vice versa), residential and nonresidential ventilation requirements, and non-residential lighting requirements. The 2019 Standards required new residential and non-residential construction; as well as major alterations to existing structures, to include electric vehicle (EV)-capable parking spaces which have electrical panel capacity and conduit to accommodate future installation. In addition, the 2019 Standards also required the installation of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems for low-rise residential dwellings, defined as single-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings up to three-stories in height.

These requirements are based on various factors, including the floor area of the home, sun exposure, and climate zone. Under the 2019 standards, nonresidential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades (CEC 2018).

The recently updated 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (2022 Standards), which were approved in December 2021, encourages efficient electric heat pumps, establishes electric-ready requirements when natural gas is installed and to support the future installation of battery storage, and further expands solar photovoltaic and battery storage standards. The 2022 Standards extend solar PV system requirements, as well as battery storage capabilities for select land uses, including high-rise multi-family and non-residential land uses, such as office buildings, schools, restaurants, warehouses, theaters, grocery stores, and more.

Depending on the land use and other factors, solar systems should be sized to meet targets of up to 60 percent of the structure’s loads. These new solar requirements will become effective January 1, 2023, and contribute to California’s goal of reaching net-zero carbon footprint by 2045 (CEC 2022).

SHORT-LIVED CLIMATE POLLUTANT REDUCTION STRATEGY
In March 2017, the ARB adopted the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy (SLCP Strategy) establishing a path to decrease GHG emissions and displace fossil-based natural gas use. Strategies include avoiding landfill methane emissions by reducing the disposal of organics through edible food recovery, composting, in-vessel digestion, and other processes; and recovering methane from wastewater treatment facilities, and manure methane at dairies, and using the methane as a renewable source of natural gas to fuel vehicles or generate electricity. The SLCP Strategy also identifies steps to reduce natural gas leaks from oil and gas wells, pipelines, valves, and pumps to improve safety, avoid energy losses, and reduce methane emissions associated with natural gas use. Lastly, the SLCP Strategy also identifies measures that can reduce hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions at national and international levels, in addition to State-level action that includes an incentive program to encourage the use of low-GWP refrigerants, and limitations on the use of high-GWP refrigerants in new refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment (ARB 2017).

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
The SLOAPCD is a local public agency with the primary mission of realizing and preserving clean air for all county residents and businesses. Responsibilities of the SLOAPCD include, but are not limited to, preparing plans for the attainment of ambient air quality standards, adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning sources of air pollution, issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollution, inspecting stationary sources of air pollution and responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, and implementing programs and regulations required by federal and state regulatory requirements.

CITY OF PASO ROBLES CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
The City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan (CAP) is a long-range plan to reduce GHG emissions from City government operations and community activities. The CAP will also help achieve multiple community goals such as lowering energy costs, reducing air pollution, supporting local economic development. The CAP includes measures to reduce community-wide GHG emissions by 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 (City of Paso Robles 2013).

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
37 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 2019 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE

COMMUNITIES STRATEGY
The 2019 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) was adopted by the SLOCOG Board in June 2019. The RTP includes the region's Sustainable Communities' Strategy (SCS), which outlines how the region will exceed its GHG reduction targets as required by SB 375 through the promotion of a variety of transportation demand management & system management tools and techniques to maximize the efficiency of the transportation network. Consistency with the requirement of SB 375 ensures consistency with the GHG-reduction targets set by ARB. The 2019 SCS was found to be consistent with the requirement of SB 375 and is also consistent with the general plans of the region’s jurisdictions (SLOCOG 2019).

Impact Analysis
Thresholds of Significance
In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, increased GHG emissions associated with the implementation of the proposed project would be considered significant if it would:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

The SLOAPCD has not updated a recommended GHG significance thresholds. These thresholds should be based on AB 32 GHG emission reduction goals, which take into consideration the emission reduction strategies outlined in ARB’s Scoping Plan. Accordingly, if a project complies with a Qualified Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy that is specifically applicable to the project, such as the City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan, then the project would be considered to have a less-than-significant impact. The City of Paso Robles CAP includes a “Consistency Worksheet”, which identifies various measures designed to reduce project related GHG emissions. The CAP Consistency Worksheet can be used to demonstrate project-level compliance with the CAP. However, it is important to note that the City’s CAP has not been updated to reflect SB 32 GHG reductions for target year 2030 conditions. As a result, this analysis provides an analysis of consistency with the currently adopted City CAP; however, consistency with year 2030 GHG reductions, per SB 32, and the State’s Scoping Plan have been evaluated using an efficiency threshold, taking into account the City’s 2030 GHG-reduction target mandated by SB 32 and the City’s baseline GHG inventory, as identified in the City’s existing CAP. The GHG-efficiency threshold was calculated by dividing the GHG emissions inventory goal (allowable emissions), by the City’s estimated service population (SP) for year 2030 conditions.

The service population includes estimated population and employment for the City.

Emissions sectors that do not apply to the proposed project (i.e., agriculture) were excluded from the calculation. The GHG emissions inventory for the land use sectors applicable to the proposed project were then divided by the projected SP for future year 2030. The methodology used for quantification of the target efficiency threshold applied to the proposed project is summarized in Table 17. Accordingly, projectgenerated GHG emissions that would exceed the efficiency threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP/year in 2030 would be considered to have a potentially significant impact on the environment that could conflict with GHGreduction planning efforts. To be conservative, amortized construction-generated GHG emissions were included in annual operational GHG emissions estimates for comparison to this threshold, consistent with SLOAPCD-recommended methodologies.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
38 Table 17. Project-Level GHG Efficiency Threshold Calculation Operational Year 2030
Land Use Sectors GHG Emissions Target1 100,940
Population2 37,700
Employment3 16,017
Service Population (SP) 53,717
GHG Efficiency Threshold (MTCO2e/SP/yr) 1.9
Note: Employment data for interim years are estimated based on proportionality with population trends based on historical data.

1. Based on Business-as-Usual (year 2005) emissions inventory and the State’s target reductions of 40 percent below BAU baseline GHG emissions inventory by 2030. Emissions inventory reflects locally-appropriate emissions sectors.

2.. Based on population data derived from the City of Paso Robles Demographic website. Website url:
https://www.prcity.com/244/Demographics.

3. Based on employment data derived from the California Employment Development Department. Labor Force and Unemployment Rates for Cities and Census Designated Places. Website url: https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/labor-force-and-unemployment-for-citiesand-census-areas.html.

Methodology
Emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2022.1.1.2 computer program. Project construction is anticipated to occur over an approximately 17-month period beginning in 2023. Construction phase durations were based on model defaults. No existing structure would be demolished. A total of approximately 7,200 cubic yards (cy) of material would be exported during grading. Additional construction information such as off-road equipment use, worker vehicle trips, and equipment load factors were based on default parameters contained in the model. Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix B of this report.

Long-term operational emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod, version 2022.1.1.2 based, in part, on vehicle trip-generation rates derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project (CCTC 2022). Vehicle travel distribution/distances were not available and were based on model defaults for the County. Emission modeling files are provided in Appendix B.

Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Impact GHG-A. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of CO2 from mobile sources. To a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as CH4 and N2O, would also be generated. Short-term and long-term GHG emissions associated with the development of the proposed project are discussed in greater detail, as follows:

Short-term Construction GHG Emissions
Estimated increases in GHG emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project are summarized in Table 18. Based on the modeling conducted, construction-related GHG emissions would total approximately 382 MTCO2e. Amortized GHG emissions, when averaged over the assumed 25-year minimum life of the project, would total approximately 15.3 MTCO2e/year. There would also be a small amount of GHG emissions from waste generated during construction; however, this amount is speculative. Actual emissions may vary, depending on the final construction schedules, equipment required, and activities conducted.

Amortized construction-generated GHG emissions are included in the operational GHG emissions impact discussion provided below.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
39 Table 18. Construction-Generated GHG Emissions Without Mitigation Construction Year GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e/Year)
2023 196
2024 186
Total Construction Emissions: 382
Amortized Construction Emissions: 15.3
Amortized emissions are quantified based on a minimum 25-year project life. Refer to Appendix B for modeling assumptions and results.

Long-term Operational GHG Emissions
Estimated long-term increases in GHG emissions associated with the proposed project for future year 2030 conditions are summarized in Table 19. For informational purposes, opening year 2024 emissions were also calculated and included in Table 19. As depicted, operational GHG emissions for the proposed project, with the inclusion of amortized construction GHGs, would total approximately 1,164.6 MTCO2e/year under operational year 2030 conditions. A majority of the operational GHG emissions would be associated with motor vehicle use, energy use, and refrigerant. To a lesser extent, operational GHG emissions would also be associated with solid waste generation and water use. As depicted in Table 19, total emissions would equate to 8.8 MTCO2e/SP, which would exceed the significance threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP. As a result, this impact is considered potentially significant.

Table 19. Operational GHG Emissions Without Mitigation
Operational Year/Source
GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/Year)
Opening
Year 2024
Future Operational
Year 2030
Mobile1 187 170
Energy Source (Nat Gas)2 365.7 365.7
Area Source3 6.54 8.47
Water4 0.5 0.5
Waste5 51.7 51.7
Refrigerant 553 553
Amortized Construction Emissions: 15.28 15.28
Total Emissions: 1,179.7 1,164.6
Total MTCO2e/SP6: 8.8
GHG Efficiency Significance Threshold: 1.9
Exceeds Threshold? Yes

1. Based on default fleet mix for land uses contained in CalEEMod for San Luis Obispo County.

2. Includes adjustment for California Renewable Portfolio Standards requirements.

3. Area source includes emissions associated primarily with the use of landscape maintenance equipment.

4. Incudes use of low-flow water fixtures and water-efficient irrigation systems, per current building code requirements.

5. Based on an average annual waste diversion/recycling rate of 50% based on statewide averages.

6. Project employees estimated 133 based on the typical square footage per employee from industry standard sources contained in the traffic report (CCTC 2022).

Refer to Appendix B for modeling assumptions and results.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
40 Mitigation Measures
GHG-1: In addition to implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-3 and AQ-4, the following additional measures shall be implemented:
a. Proposed land uses shall receive electricity from onsite solar, shall elect to receive electricity from Central Coast Community Energy (3CE), or a combination thereof. b. Building mechanical equipment and appliances shall be electrically powered. The installation of natural-gas service/infrastructure shall be prohibited. c. Meet current CALGreen Tier 2 standards for electric vehicle (EV) parking spaces, to the extent applicable to the project, except that all EV parking spaces required by the code shall be “EVcapable” instead of “EV-ready”.

GHG-2: The project shall provide carbon offsets sufficient to reduce project-generated GHG emissions to below applicable thresholds, calculated over the life of the project. Based on the modeling conducted, the project shall provide offsets in the total amount of 5,181 MTCO2e. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4, subdivisions (c)(3) and (c)(4), a project’s GHG emissions can be reduced through the application of off-site measures, which may include “Direct Reduction Activities” or the purchase of “Carbon Offset Credits”, which are discussed as follows:

Direct Reduction Activities
Directly undertake or fund activities that will reduce or sequester GHG emissions. GHG reduction credits shall achieve GHG emission reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, enforceable, in accordance with the criteria set forth in the ARB’s most recent Process for the Review and Approval of Compliance Offset Protocols in Support of the Cap-and-Trade Regulation (2013). GHG reduction credits shall be undertaken for the specific purpose of reduction projectgenerated GHG emissions and shall not include reductions that would otherwise be required by law. All Direct Reduction Activities and associated reduction credits shall be confirmed by an independent, qualified third-party.

The “Direct Reduction Activity” shall be registered with a California Air Resources Board (ARB)- approved registry and in compliance with ARB-approved protocols. In accordance with the applicable Registry requirements, the Project applicant (or its designee) shall retain an independent, qualified third-party to confirm the GHG emissions reduction or sequestration achieved by the Direct GHG Reduction Activities against the applicable Registry protocol or methodology. The Project applicant (or its designee) will then apply for issuance of carbon credits in accordance with the applicable Registry rules.

Carbon Offsets
Obtain and retire “Carbon Offsets.” Carbon Offsets shall achieve GHG reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, and enforceable. Carbon offsets shall be purchased from ARBapproved registries and shall comply with ARB-approved protocols to ensure that offset credits accurately and reliably represent actual emissions reductions. If the purchase of carbon offsets is selected, offsets shall be purchased according to the City of San Luis Obispo’s preference, which is, in order of City preference: (1) within the City of San Luis Obispo; (2) within the SLOAPCD jurisdictional area; (3) within the State of California; then (4) elsewhere in the United States. In the event that a project or program providing offsets to the project applicant loses its accreditation, the project applicant shall comply with the rules and procedures of retiring offsets specific to the registry involved and shall purchase an equivalent number of credits to recoup the loss.

Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-3 would require implementation of numerous measures to reduce long-term operational emissions. Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would include additional measures that would result in substantial reductions in GHG emissions associated with energy use. With implementation of these measures, project generated emissions would be reduced to approximately 3.1 MTCO2e/SP under operational year 2030 conditions, which would still exceed the significance threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP.

Mitigation Measure GHG-2 would require carbon offsets sufficient to reduce project-generated GHG Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
41 emissions to below applicable GHG thresholds, calculated over the estimated 25-year life of the project. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Table 20. Operational GHG Emissions With Mitigation Measure GHG-1 Operational Year/Source
GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/Year)
Opening
Year 2024
Future Operational
Year 2030
Mobile1 187 170
Energy Source (Nat Gas)2 <0.1 <0.1
Area Source3 6.54 8.47
Water4 0.4 0.4
Waste5 25.9 25.9
Refrigerant 196 196
Amortized Construction Emissions: 15.28 15.28
Total Emissions: 431.1 416.1
Total MTCO2e/SP6: 3.1
GHG Efficiency Significance Threshold: 1.9
Exceeds Threshold? Yes

1. Based on default fleet mix for land uses contained in CalEEMod for San Luis Obispo County.

2. Includes use installation of onsite solar to meat the electrical needs of the project and exclusion of natural gas appliances.

3. Area source includes emissions associated primarily with the use of landscape maintenance equipment.

4. Incudes use of low-flow water fixtures and water-efficient irrigation systems, per current building code requirements.

5. Based on an average annual waste diversion/recycling rate of 50% based on statewide averages.

6. Project employees estimated 133 based on the typical square footage per employee from industry standard sources contained in the traffic report (CCTC 2022).

Refer to Appendix B for modeling assumptions and results.

Impact GHG-B Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
As noted in Table 19 and Table 20, operational GHG emissions attributable to the proposed project would be primarily associated with mobile sources. Applicable GHG-reduction plans related to reducing operational GHG emissions include the City of Paso Robles CAP, the County of San Luis Obispo’s Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, and California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan.

The project’s consistency with these plans is discussed in greater detail, as follows:

City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan
The City’s CAP is a long-range plan to reduce GHG emissions from City government operations and community activities within the community. The City’s CAP includes numerous measures to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy use, motor vehicle use, water use, waste generation, and construction. It is important to note, however, that the City’s CAP is based on year 2020 GHG-reduction targets and has not yet been updated to reflect year 2030 GHG-reduction targets, per SB32. Nonetheless, a summary of the proposed Project’s consistency with the measures identified in the City’s CAP are summarized in Table 21. As noted, and with implementation of proposed mitigation measures, the project would be consistent with the GHG-reduction measures identified in the City’s currently adopted CAP (City of Paso Robles 2013).

County of San Luis Obispo 2019 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy The 2019 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) was adopted by the SLOCOG Board in June 2019. The RTP includes the region's Sustainable Communities' Strategy (SCS), which outlines how the region will meet or Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
42 exceed its GHG reduction targets as required by SB 375 through the promotion of a variety of transportation demand management & system management tools and techniques to maximize the efficiency of the transportation network. Consistency with the requirement of SB 375 ensures consistency with the GHGreduction targets set by ARB. The 2019 SCS was found to be consistent with the requirement of SB 375 and is also consistent with the general plans of the region’s jurisdictions (SLOCOG 2019).

According to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, the City of Paso Robles has about 15 percent more housing units than jobs, indicative of a “jobs-poor” community. The City’s housing to jobs ratio is estimated to decrease from a year 2015 ratio of 1.15 jobs/housing to a ratio of 1.112 jobs/housing by year 2035, thereby decreasing the imbalance between jobs and housing units. The proposed project would result in increased employment and would not result in an increase in housing. As a result, the proposed project would be anticipated to improve the jobs-housing imbalance. In addition, based on the VMT analysis prepared for the project, project-generated VMT would not exceed the City’s VMT significance threshold. As a result, the project would not be considered to conflict with regional VMT-reduction efforts.

California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan
As previously noted, ARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan reflects the new statewide GHG emissions reductions of 40 percent below 1990 emissions levels by 2030, as mandated by SB 32. A significant part of achieving the SB 32 goals are strategies to promote sustainable communities, such as the promotion of zero net energy buildings, and improved transportation choices that result in reducing VMT. Other measures include the increased use of low-carbon fuels and cleaner vehicles.

To support the State’s GHG emissions reduction goals, including the goals mandated by SB 32, California established the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act (SB 375). SB 375 requires regional metropolitan planning organizations, such as SBCAG, to develop SCSs which align transportation, housing, and land use decisions toward achieving the State’s GHG emissions-reduction targets. Under SB 375, the development and implementation of SCSs, which link transportation, land use, housing, and climate policy at the regional level, are designed to reduce per capita mobile-source GHG emissions, which is accomplished through implementation of measures that would result in reductions in per capita VMT.

In 2018, ARB adopted more aggressive SB 375 targets as one measure to support progress toward the 2017 Scoping Plan goals. SB 375 aims to achieve, a 19 percent reduction in statewide per capita GHG emissions from passenger vehicles by year 2035 (relative to year 2005). To achieve this reduction, ARB sets target reductions for various regions throughout the state to be included in the RTP and SCS prepared for these regions. As discussed above, the proposed project would not exceed applicable VMT thresholds. As a result, the proposed project would not conflict with regional VMT-reduction goals. However, as noted in Impact GHG-1, the proposed project would exceed the efficiency threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP/year, which is based on achieving SB-32 year 2030 GHG-reduction targets, consistent with ARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. For these reasons, without mitigation, the proposed project could conflict with the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan.

It is also important to note that the ARB has recently released its Draft 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update (ARB 2022). Consistent with the current 2017 Scoping Plan, the Draft 2022 Scoping Plan assesses the State’s progress towards meeting its target of reducing statewide GHG emissions to 40 percent below the 1990 levels by 2030. The Draft 2022 Scoping Plan also lays out a path for achieving carbon neutrality no later than 2045, per the goal identified in Executive Order B-55-18. The draft Scoping Plan is anticipated to be approved in the fall of 2022.

For land use development projects, additional reductions in GHG emissions may be required in order to meet the project’s fair share of the statewide reductions required to achieve carbon neutrality, consistent with Executive Order B-55-18 and ARB’s Draft 2022 Scoping Plan Update. Neither the SLOAPCD nor the City of Paso Robles have developed recommended thresholds of significance that are based on achieving carbon neutrality by year 2045. However, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has recently released recommended GHG significance thresholds that are based on a “fair share” approach for achieving carbon neutrality goals. Consistent with this approach, new land use development projects would be considered to be consistent with the State’s carbon neutrality goals and would be considered to have a less than significant impact if: 1) the project is deemed consistent with regional VMT-reduction targets; 2) the project prohibits the installation of natural gas infrastructure; and 3) the project would not result in a wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary energy use as determined by the analysis required under CEQA Section Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
43 21100(b)(3) and Section 15126.2(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Similarly, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) has also recently released Best Management Practices (BMPs), which also include the prohibited installation of natural gas infrastructure for development projects, as well as, a requirement that project’s meet current CALGreen Tier 2 standards for electric vehicle (EV) spaces, except that EV-capable spaces shall instead be EV ready. This additional requirement requires the installation of electrical infrastructure sufficient to service the future installation of EV chargers. The BAAQMD and SMAQMD thresholds are based on an approach endorsed by the Supreme Court in Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015). Although not located within these jurisdictions, development in Santa Maria and associated GHG emissions are comparable to those generated by developments within other areas of the state, including the BAAQMD and SMAQMD jurisdictions. Given that climate change is inherently a cumulative impact that occurs on a global scale, these BMPs would, likewise, be considered representative of the project’s “fair share” of what would be required to meet the State’s long-term climate goals, including achieving carbon neutrality by 2045, as identified by the BAAQMD and the SMAQMD.

As noted above, the proposed project would be consistent with the regional VMT-reduction targets.

However, as noted in Impact GHG-1, the proposed project would exceed the efficiency threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP/year, which is based on achieving SB-32 year 2030 GHG-reduction targets, consistent with ARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan. For these reasons, without mitigation, the proposed project could conflict with the Climate Change Scoping Plan. In addition, the proposed project does not include BMPs that would constitute its “fair share” of what would be required to meet the State’s long-term (i.e., post year 2030) climate goals, including achieving carbon neutrality by 2045. Specifically, the project does not prohibit the installation of natural gas-fired appliances/equipment, nor require that current CALGreen Tier 2 compliant EV spaces to be EV ready, as opposed to EV capable. As a result, this impact would be considered potentially significant.

Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation Measures AQ-3, AQ-4, GHG-1 and GHG-2.

Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-3 would include various measures that would help to promote the use of alternative means of transportation along with reductions in GHG emissions associated with energy use, water use, waste generation, and mobile sources. Implementation of Mitigation Measures GHG-1 and GHG-2 would result in further reductions in on-site and off-site GHG emissions.

Additional measures have also been included to require the installation of EV-ready parking spaces and to prohibit the installation of natural gas-fired appliance/equipment, in accordance with recommended BMPs for achieving fair-share reductions in GHGs in support of the State’s carbon neutrality goals. With regard to CALGreen EV parking requirements, “EV Capable” is defined as including the installation of “raceway” (the enclosed conduit that forms the physical pathway for electrical wiring to protect it from damage) and adequate future installation of a dedicated branch circuit and charging station(s). “EV Ready” includes “EV Capable” requirements plus addition of dedicated branch circuit(s) (electrical pre-wiring), circuit breakers, and other electrical components, including a receptacle (240-volt outlet) or blank cover needed to support future installation of one or more charging stations. With mitigation, the project would be considered consistent with the local, regional, and state GHG-reduction planning efforts. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Table 21. Project Consistency with the City’s Climate Action Plan CAP Measures Project Consistency
Energy Measures
Does the Project include an operational commitment to
reduce energy demand and increase on-site energy
supply?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to reduce on-site energy use/demand and to
increase on-site energy supply by requiring the installation of renewable energy systems.(refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-3).

Does the Project exclusively include “All-electric
buildings”?
Consistent with Mitigation. A mitigation measure has been included to encourage the installation of electricallypowered appliances in place of natural gas to the extent possible. In addition, mitigation has also been included to If the Project/Plan includes a new mixed-fuel building or buildings (plumbed for the use of natural gas as fuel for Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
44 space heating, water heating, cooking or clothes drying appliances) does that building/those buildings exceed
the City’s Energy Reach code?
require the installation of infrastructure to facilitate the future installation of alternative energy sources, such as the installation of photovoltaic systems (refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-3 and GHG-1).

Transportation and Land Use Measures
Does the Project comply with requirements in the City’s Municipal Code with no exceptions, including bicycle
parking, bikeway design, and EV charging stations?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require compliance with applicable building codes related to bicycle parking, bikeway design, and EV charging stations (refer to Mitigation Measures AQ-3).

Is the estimated Project-generated Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) within the City’s adopted thresholds, as confirmed by the City’s Transportation Division?
Consistent. Based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project, project-generated VMT is within the City’s
adopted thresholds.

If “No”, does the Project/Plan include VMT mitigation
strategies and/or a Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) Plan approved by the City’s Transportation Division? Does the Project demonstrate consistency with the City’s Bicycle Network Plan?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require the project to incorporate features to promote alternative means of transportation, including
the installation of bicycle facilities (refer to Mitigation Measures AQ-3).

Off-Road Measure
Will the Project work to reduce GHG emissions by reducing off-road equipment and vehicle usage and idling?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require the Project restrict idling and vehicle usage when feasible and to use alternatively-powered
equipment where possible (refer to Mitigation Measures
AQ-2 and GHG-1).

Water Measure
Does the Project comply with water efficiency and
conservation requirements?
Consistent with Mitigation. A mitigation measure has been included to require the use of low-flow water fixtures, water-efficient irrigation systems, and drought-tolerant landscaping (refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-3).

Waste Measure
Does the Project include an operational commitment to
reduce the amount of trash and other waste and recycle
as many materials as possible?
Consistent. The Project shall provide organic waste pick up and shall provide the appropriate on-site enclosures
consistent with the provisions of the City of Paso Robles Development Standards for Solid Waste Services (refer to Mitigation Measure GHG-1).

Tree Planting Measure
Does the Project include an operational commitment to
maintain a healthy urban forest and incorporate native
drought tolerant trees?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require the installation of trees and drought tolerant landscaping (refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-3).

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Nutwood Self-Storage Project January 2023
45 REFERENCES
California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 20,2018. ARB Health-Related Fact Sheets. Website URL:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/health/fs/fs.htm.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 20, 2017. California Green Building Strategy. Website URL:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/greenbuildings/greenbuildings.htm.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 13, 2022. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory.

Website URL: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Website URL:
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed December 12, 2020. Short Lived Climate Pollutants. Website URL:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/slcp.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed December 16, 2021. Air Quality Standards and Area Designations.

Website URL: https://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/desig.htm.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). 2022. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory: 2000-2019. Available at website url: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/cc/ca_ghg_inventory_trends_2000-2019.pdf.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). April 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective.

California Energy Commission (CEC). 2019. 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Website url:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2019-buildingenergy-efficiency.

California Employment Development Department. Labor Force and Unemployment Rate for Cities and Census Designated Places. Website url: https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/labor-force-and-unemploymentfor-cities-and-census-areas.html Central Coast Transportation Consulting (CCTC). November 2022. Nutwood Self-Storage Draft Transportation Analysis.

City of Paso Robles. 2013. City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan. Available at Website url:
https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/View/14729/Climate-Action-Plan-PDF.

City of Paso Robles. Accessed September 13, 2022. Demographics. Website URL: https://www.prcity.com/ 244/Demographics.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Fourth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Available at website url: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/ 2018/03/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf.

San Luis Obispo County Council of Governments (SLOCOG). 2019. Regional Housing Needs Assessment.

San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG). 2019. SLOCOG 2019 Regional Transportation Plan. Available at website url: file:///C:/Users/Kurt/Downloads/__FINAL%202019%20RTP.pdf.

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). December 2001. Clean Air Plan.

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). April 2012. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Available at website url: https://www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php.

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). 2017 Clarification Memo related to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Available at website url: https://www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php.

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). 2018. APCD Naturally Occurring Asbestos Map. Available at website url: https://www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Accessed: August 20, 2018. Overview of Greenhouse Gases.

Website URL: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2022. AirNow. Website url: https://www.airnow.gov/.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

APPENDIX A

EMISSIONS MODELING
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

CARBON OFFSET CALCULATION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 AMORTIZED CONSTRUCTION 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 MOBILE 187.00 184.17 181.33 178.50 175.67 172.83 170.00 168.35 166.70 165.05 163.40 161.75 160.10 158.45 156.80 155.15 153.50 151.85 150.20 148.55 146.90 145.25 143.60 141.95 140.30 AREA SOURCE 6.54 6.86 7.18 7.51 7.83 8.15 8.47 8.66 8.85 9.04 9.24 9.43 9.62 9.81 10.00 10.19 10.39 10.58 10.77 10.96 11.15 11.34 11.53 11.73 11.92 WASTE 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90 WATER 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Refrigerant 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 TOTAL 431.12 428.61 426.10 423.59 421.07 418.56 416.05 414.59 413.13 411.67 410.22 408.76 407.30 405.84 404.38 402.92 401.47 400.01 398.55 397.09 395.63 394.17 392.71 391.26 389.80 CO2e/SP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 THRESHOLD 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 -17.00 1.93
-2.8333 0.3217
CARBON OFFSET REQUIRED 85 109 120 131 142 153 163 179 187 186 197 209 208 220 231 230 242 254 252 264 276 274 286 285 297 LIFETIME CARBON OFFSETS (MTCO2e):

ESTIMATED $/MT: 0.1267
ESTIMATED TOTAL OFFSET COST:

SOURCE
YEAR
$103,615
20 5181
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
1 / 82
Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated

3.2. Site Preparation (2023) - Mitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
2 / 82

3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated

3.4. Site Preparation (2023) - Mitigated

3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated

3.6. Grading (2023) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2023) - Mitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.10. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated

3.11. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

3.12. Paving (2024) - Mitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

3.14. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated

3.15. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated

3.16. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
3 / 82

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.3.1. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.4.1. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.5.1. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
4 / 82

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
5 / 82

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
6 / 82

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
7 / 82

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

8. User Changes to Default Data
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
8 / 82

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Nutwood Mini Storage
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 15.6
Location 35.57850002755643, -120.70139135226397
County San Luis Obispo
City Unincorporated
Air District San Luis Obispo County APCD
Air Basin South Central Coast
TAZ 3309
EDFZ 6
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

49.6 1000sqft 1.14 49,585 0.00 — — Unrefrigerated
General Office
Building

1.39 1000sqft 0.03 1,390 0.00 — — Office
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
9 / 82
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

1.24 Acre 1.24 0.00 0.00 — — Paving
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
125 1000sqft 2.87 125,234 0.00 — — Refrigerated

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-2* Limit Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Construction C-5 Use Advanced Engine Tiers
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Construction C-13 Use Low-VOC Paints for Construction
Energy E-2 Require Energy Efficient Appliances
Energy E-10-B Establish Onsite Renewable Energy Systems: Solar Power Water W-4 Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures
Water W-7 Adopt a Water Conservation Strategy
Waste S-1/S-2 Implement Waste Reduction Plan
Refrigerants R-1 Use Alternative Refrigerants Instead of High-GWP Refrigerants Refrigerants R-5 Reduce Service Leak Emissions
Area Sources AS-1 Use Low-VOC Cleaning Supplies
Area Sources AS-2 Use Low-VOC Paints
* Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
10 / 82
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.40 9.54 21.5 17.5 0.05 0.87 2.56 3.42 0.80 1.09 1.89 — 5,166 5,166 0.24 0.46 5.47 5,315 Mit. 1.08 5.67 14.3 19.3 0.06 0.32 2.69 2.82 0.29 1.10 1.23 — 5,733 5,733 0.26 0.46 5.47 5,884 %
Reduced
55% 41% 34% -10% -10% 63% -5% 18% 64% -1% 35% — -11% -11% -10% -1% — -11% Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.92 1.62 13.1 16.3 0.03 0.56 0.59 1.15 0.52 0.15 0.66 — 3,515 3,515 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,559 Mit. 1.07 0.96 10.6 18.2 0.03 0.14 0.59 0.73 0.13 0.15 0.28 — 3,515 3,515 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,559 %
Reduced
44% 41% 19% -11% — 76% — 37% 75% — 58% — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.62 0.63 4.65 5.37 0.01 0.20 0.34 0.54 0.18 0.13 0.31 — 1,163 1,163 0.05 0.06 0.53 1,183 Mit. 0.31 0.36 3.56 5.94 0.01 0.05 0.35 0.39 0.05 0.13 0.17 — 1,203 1,203 0.05 0.06 0.53 1,224 %
Reduced
50% 42% 23% -11% — 74% -3% 27% 74% -1% 46% — -4% -4% -3% — — -3% Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.11 0.12 0.85 0.98 < 0.005 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.02 0.06 — 192 192 0.01 0.01 0.09 196 Mit. 0.06 0.07 0.65 1.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 199 199 0.01 0.01 0.09 203 %
Reduced
50% 42% 23% -11% -4% 74% -3% 27% 74% -1% 46% — -4% -4% -3% -1% — -3%

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
11 / 82
Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 2.40 1.90 21.5 17.5 0.05 0.87 2.56 3.42 0.80 1.09 1.89 — 5,166 5,166 0.24 0.46 5.47 5,315 2024 1.84 9.54 12.4 16.1 0.03 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.47 0.15 0.61 — 3,517 3,517 0.15 0.14 3.75 3,565 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.92 1.62 13.1 16.3 0.03 0.56 0.59 1.15 0.52 0.15 0.66 — 3,515 3,515 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,559 2024 1.82 1.54 12.5 16.0 0.03 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.47 0.15 0.61 — 3,498 3,498 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,542 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.62 0.51 4.65 5.04 0.01 0.20 0.34 0.54 0.18 0.13 0.31 — 1,163 1,163 0.05 0.06 0.53 1,183 2024 0.59 0.63 4.08 5.37 0.01 0.17 0.17 0.34 0.16 0.04 0.20 — 1,110 1,110 0.05 0.04 0.46 1,123 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.11 0.09 0.85 0.92 < 0.005 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.02 0.06 — 192 192 0.01 0.01 0.09 196 2024 0.11 0.12 0.74 0.98 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.04 — 184 184 0.01 0.01 0.08 186

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.08 0.96 14.3 19.3 0.06 0.27 2.69 2.82 0.25 1.10 1.23 — 5,733 5,733 0.26 0.46 5.47 5,884 2024 1.04 5.67 10.5 18.0 0.03 0.32 0.59 0.72 0.29 0.15 0.31 — 3,517 3,517 0.15 0.14 3.75 3,565 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.07 0.96 10.6 18.2 0.03 0.14 0.59 0.73 0.13 0.15 0.28 — 3,515 3,515 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,559 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
12 / 82
2024 1.03 0.91 10.5 17.9 0.03 0.13 0.59 0.72 0.12 0.15 0.27 — 3,498 3,498 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,542 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.29 0.25 3.44 5.52 0.01 0.04 0.35 0.39 0.04 0.13 0.17 — 1,203 1,203 0.05 0.06 0.53 1,224 2024 0.31 0.36 3.56 5.94 0.01 0.05 0.17 0.22 0.05 0.04 0.09 — 1,110 1,110 0.05 0.04 0.46 1,123 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.05 0.05 0.63 1.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 199 199 0.01 0.01 0.09 203 2024 0.06 0.07 0.65 1.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 184 184 0.01 0.01 0.08 186

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.65 7.37 1.02 13.5 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 89.7 3,351 3,441 9.38 0.14 3,342 7,060 Mit. 2.65 6.20 1.02 13.5 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 45.1 1,355 1,400 4.59 0.10 1,190 2,736 %
Reduced
— 16% — — — — — — — — — 50% 60% 59% 51% 27% 64% 61%
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.26 6.09 1.02 6.11 0.01 0.02 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.09 89.7 3,287 3,376 9.39 0.11 3,338 6,980 Mit. 1.26 4.91 1.02 6.11 0.01 0.02 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.09 45.1 1,290 1,335 4.60 0.07 1,186 2,656 %
Reduced
— 19% — — — — — — — — — 50% 61% 60% 51% 37% 64% 62%
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.49 7.21 1.07 12.9 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 89.7 3,320 3,410 9.39 0.14 3,340 7,027 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
13 / 82
Mit. 2.49 6.04 1.07 12.9 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 45.1 1,324 1,369 4.60 0.10 1,188 2,702 %
Reduced
— 16% — — — — — — — — — 50% 60% 60% 51% 28% 64% 62%
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.45 1.32 0.20 2.35 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 14.9 550 565 1.55 0.02 553 1,163 Mit. 0.45 1.10 0.20 2.35 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 7.46 219 227 0.76 0.02 197 447 %
Reduced
— 16% — — — — — — — — — 50% 60% 60% 51% 28% 64% 62%

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.27 1.21 0.79 5.73 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,132 1,132 0.07 0.06 4.59 1,156 Area 1.36 6.16 0.06 7.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 43.7 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 2,187 2,187 0.34 0.04 — 2,207 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.79 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 89.3 0.00 89.3 8.92 0.00 — 312 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,338 3,338
Total 2.65 7.37 1.02 13.5 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 89.7 3,351 3,441 9.38 0.14 3,342 7,060 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.25 1.18 0.86 5.97 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,099 1,099 0.08 0.07 0.12 1,120 Area — 4.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 2,187 2,187 0.34 0.04 — 2,207 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.79 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
14 / 82
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 89.3 0.00 89.3 8.92 0.00 — 312 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,338 3,338
Total 1.26 6.09 1.02 6.11 0.01 0.02 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.09 89.7 3,287 3,376 9.39 0.11 3,338 6,980 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.24 1.17 0.85 5.82 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,104 1,104 0.08 0.06 1.98 1,127 Area 1.23 6.04 0.06 6.93 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 28.5 28.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 39.5 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 2,187 2,187 0.34 0.04 — 2,207 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.79 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 89.3 0.00 89.3 8.92 0.00 — 312 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,338 3,338
Total 2.49 7.21 1.07 12.9 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 89.7 3,320 3,410 9.39 0.14 3,340 7,027 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.23 0.21 0.16 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 183 183 0.01 0.01 0.33 187 Area 0.22 1.10 0.01 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.72 4.72 < 0.005 0.01 — 6.54 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 362 362 0.06 0.01 — 365 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.12 0.20 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.46 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 14.8 0.00 14.8 1.48 0.00 — 51.7 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 553 553
Total 0.45 1.32 0.20 2.35 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 14.9 550 565 1.55 0.02 553 1,163

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.27 1.21 0.79 5.73 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,132 1,132 0.07 0.06 4.59 1,156 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
15 / 82
Area 1.36 4.98 0.06 7.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 43.7 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.51 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 44.6 0.00 44.6 4.46 0.00 — 156 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Total 2.65 6.20 1.02 13.5 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 45.1 1,355 1,400 4.59 0.10 1,190 2,736 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.25 1.18 0.86 5.97 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,099 1,099 0.08 0.07 0.12 1,120 Area — 3.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.51 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 44.6 0.00 44.6 4.46 0.00 — 156 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Total 1.26 4.91 1.02 6.11 0.01 0.02 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.09 45.1 1,290 1,335 4.60 0.07 1,186 2,656 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.24 1.17 0.85 5.82 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,104 1,104 0.08 0.06 1.98 1,127 Area 1.23 4.86 0.06 6.93 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 28.5 28.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 39.5 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.51 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 44.6 0.00 44.6 4.46 0.00 — 156 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Total 2.49 6.04 1.07 12.9 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 45.1 1,324 1,369 4.60 0.10 1,188 2,702 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.23 0.21 0.16 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 183 183 0.01 0.01 0.33 187 Area 0.22 0.89 0.01 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.72 4.72 < 0.005 0.01 — 6.54 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.7 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
16 / 82
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.11 0.18 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.42 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 7.39 0.00 7.39 0.74 0.00 — 25.9 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 196 196
Total 0.45 1.10 0.20 2.35 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 7.46 219 227 0.76 0.02 197 447

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.52 1.27 12.8 11.2 0.02 0.58 — 0.58 0.53 — 0.53 — 1,668 1,668 0.07 0.01 — 1,674 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.70 1.70 — 0.88 0.88 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 22.9 22.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.9 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
17 / 82
Dust — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.78 3.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.80 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 32.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
18 / 82
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2. Site Preparation (2023) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.22 5.62 9.75 0.02 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 1,810 1,810 0.07 0.01 — 1,816 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.70 1.70 — 0.88 0.88 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.8 24.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.9 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.10 4.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.12 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
19 / 82
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 32.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
20 / 82
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.96 1.64 16.6 16.9 0.02 0.76 — 0.76 0.70 — 0.70 — 2,539 2,539 0.10 0.02 — 2,548 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.70 1.70 — 0.88 0.88 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.9 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.46 3.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.47 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
21 / 82
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.47 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 79.0 79.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37 80.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.64 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.4. Site Preparation (2023) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.74 0.65 8.42 14.4 0.02 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 2,539 2,539 0.10 0.02 — 2,548 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
22 / 82
Dust — — — — — — 1.70 1.70 — 0.88 0.88 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.9 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.46 3.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.47 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.47 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 79.0 79.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37 80.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
23 / 82
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.64 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.14 1.79 17.4 15.9 0.02 0.82 — 0.82 0.76 — 0.76 — 2,377 2,377 0.10 0.02 — 2,385 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.85 1.85 — 0.89 0.89 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
24 / 82
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.12 1.19 1.09 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 163 163 0.01 < 0.005 — 163 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.13 0.13 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.22 0.20 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 27.0 27.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.0 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.38 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 63.2 63.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 64.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.21 0.05 4.01 1.30 0.03 0.05 0.17 0.22 0.05 0.06 0.11 — 2,726 2,726 0.14 0.44 5.18 2,865 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 4.18 4.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.25 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
25 / 82
Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.28 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 187 187 0.01 0.03 0.15 196 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 32.5

3.6. Grading (2023) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.39 0.39 10.2 17.7 0.03 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 2,944 2,944 0.12 0.02 — 2,954 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.98 1.98 — 0.91 0.91 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.70 1.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 202 202 0.01 < 0.005 — 202 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.14 0.14 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
26 / 82
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 33.4 33.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.5 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.38 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 63.2 63.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 64.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.21 0.05 4.01 1.30 0.03 0.05 0.17 0.22 0.05 0.06 0.11 — 2,726 2,726 0.14 0.44 5.18 2,865 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 4.18 4.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.25 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.28 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 187 187 0.01 0.03 0.15 196 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 32.5 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
27 / 82

3.7. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.50 1.26 11.8 13.2 0.02 0.55 — 0.55 0.51 — 0.51 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.50 1.26 11.8 13.2 0.02 0.55 — 0.55 0.51 — 0.51 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.33 0.27 2.57 2.86 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 521 521 0.02 < 0.005 — 523 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.47 0.52 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 86.2 86.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 86.5 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
28 / 82
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker 0.36 0.34 0.22 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 467 467 0.03 0.02 2.19 476 Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.05 0.44 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 670 670 0.02 0.10 1.71 701 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.36 0.33 0.26 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 448 448 0.03 0.02 0.06 454 Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.08 0.45 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 670 670 0.02 0.10 0.04 699 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 97.9 97.9 0.01 < 0.005 0.20 99.6 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 145 145 0.01 0.02 0.16 152 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.5 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 25.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Building Construction (2023) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
29 / 82
Off-Road 0.66 0.59 9.30 15.0 0.02 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.66 0.59 9.30 15.0 0.02 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.13 2.02 3.26 0.01 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 521 521 0.02 < 0.005 — 523 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.37 0.60 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 86.2 86.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 86.5 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.36 0.34 0.22 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 467 467 0.03 0.02 2.19 476 Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.05 0.44 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 670 670 0.02 0.10 1.71 701 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.36 0.33 0.26 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 448 448 0.03 0.02 0.06 454 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
30 / 82
Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.08 0.45 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 670 670 0.02 0.10 0.04 699 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 97.9 97.9 0.01 < 0.005 0.20 99.6 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 145 145 0.01 0.02 0.16 152 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.5 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 25.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.44 1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.44 1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
31 / 82
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 0.33 3.10 3.62 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 662 662 0.03 0.01 — 664 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.57 0.66 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 110 110 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 110 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.35 0.31 0.21 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 459 459 0.03 0.02 2.04 467 Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.00 0.40 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 660 660 0.02 0.10 1.71 691 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.33 0.31 0.23 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 440 440 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Vendor 0.05 0.03 1.03 0.42 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 661 661 0.02 0.10 0.04 690 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 122 122 0.01 0.01 0.24 124 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.28 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 182 182 0.01 0.03 0.20 191 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 20.6 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
32 / 82
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 30.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 31.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.10. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.64 0.58 9.26 15.0 0.02 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.64 0.58 9.26 15.0 0.02 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.16 2.55 4.14 0.01 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 662 662 0.03 0.01 — 664 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.47 0.76 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 110 110 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 110 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
33 / 82
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.35 0.31 0.21 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 459 459 0.03 0.02 2.04 467 Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.00 0.40 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 660 660 0.02 0.10 1.71 691 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.33 0.31 0.23 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 440 440 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Vendor 0.05 0.03 1.03 0.42 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 661 661 0.02 0.10 0.04 690 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 122 122 0.01 0.01 0.24 124 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.28 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 182 182 0.01 0.03 0.20 191 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 20.6 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 30.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 31.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
34 / 82
Off-Road
Equipment

1.01 0.85 7.81 10.0 0.01 0.39 — 0.39 0.36 — 0.36 — 1,512 1,512 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.32 0.41 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 62.1 62.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 62.3 Paving — 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.3 10.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.3 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 93.2 93.2 0.01 < 0.005 0.41 94.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
35 / 82
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 3.69 3.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.61 0.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.12. Paving (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.25 8.58 10.6 0.01 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 1,512 1,512 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.35 0.44 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 62.1 62.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 62.3 Paving — 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
36 / 82
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.3 10.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.3 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 93.2 93.2 0.01 < 0.005 0.41 94.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 3.69 3.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.61 0.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
37 / 82
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 9.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.84 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 91.8 91.8 0.01 < 0.005 0.41 93.5 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
38 / 82
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1.21 1.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.23 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.20 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.14. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 5.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
39 / 82
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.84 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 91.8 91.8 0.01 < 0.005 0.41 93.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1.21 1.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.23 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
40 / 82
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.20 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.28 0.24 2.40 3.83 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 581 581 0.02 < 0.005 — 583 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.28 0.24 2.40 3.83 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 581 581 0.02 < 0.005 — 583 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.30 0.47 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 71.6 71.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 71.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
41 / 82
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.9 11.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 31.1 31.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 31.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 29.8 29.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 3.69 3.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.61 0.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.16. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
42 / 82
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.09 2.36 4.06 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 581 581 0.02 < 0.005 — 583 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.09 2.36 4.06 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 581 581 0.02 < 0.005 — 583 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.29 0.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 71.6 71.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 71.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.9 11.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 31.1 31.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 31.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
43 / 82
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 29.8 29.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 3.69 3.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.61 0.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
44 / 82
Unrefrige 0.36 0.34 0.22 1.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 318 318 0.02 0.02 1.29 325 rated
Warehou
Rail
General
Office
Building

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.93 8.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 9.12 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.91 0.86 0.56 4.07 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.05 — 804 804 0.05 0.04 3.26 822 Total 1.27 1.21 0.79 5.73 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,132 1,132 0.07 0.06 4.59 1,156 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.35 0.33 0.24 1.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 309 309 0.02 0.02 0.03 315 General
Office
Building

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.67 8.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.84 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.89 0.84 0.61 4.24 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.05 — 781 781 0.06 0.05 0.08 796 Total 1.25 1.18 0.86 5.97 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,099 1,099 0.08 0.07 0.12 1,120 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
45 / 82
Unrefrige
Warehouse-No
Rail

0.06 0.06 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 51.4 51.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.5 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.44 1.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.47 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.16 0.15 0.11 0.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 130 130 0.01 0.01 0.23 133 Total 0.23 0.21 0.16 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 183 183 0.01 0.01 0.33 187

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.36 0.34 0.22 1.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 318 318 0.02 0.02 1.29 325 General
Office
Building

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.93 8.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 9.12 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
46 / 82
Refrigera 0.91 0.86 0.56 4.07 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.05 — 804 804 0.05 0.04 3.26 822 ted
Total 1.27 1.21 0.79 5.73 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,132 1,132 0.07 0.06 4.59 1,156 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.35 0.33 0.24 1.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 309 309 0.02 0.02 0.03 315 General
Office
Building

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.67 8.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.84 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.89 0.84 0.61 4.24 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.05 0.05 — 781 781 0.06 0.05 0.08 796 Total 1.25 1.18 0.86 5.97 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.08 — 1,099 1,099 0.08 0.07 0.12 1,120 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.06 0.06 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 51.4 51.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.5 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.44 1.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.47 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
47 / 82
Refrigera 0.16 0.15 0.11 0.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 130 130 0.01 0.01 0.23 133 ted
Total 0.23 0.21 0.16 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 183 183 0.01 0.01 0.33 187

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 294 294 0.05 0.01 — 297
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.4 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,686 1,686 0.27 0.03 — 1,703
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,996 1,996 0.32 0.04 — 2,016 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
48 / 82
Unrefrige — — — — — — — — — — — — 294 294 0.05 0.01 — 297 rated
Warehou
Rail
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.4 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,686 1,686 0.27 0.03 — 1,703
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,996 1,996 0.32 0.04 — 2,016 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 48.6 48.6 0.01 < 0.005 — 49.1
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.71 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 279 279 0.05 0.01 — 282
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 331 331 0.05 0.01 — 334

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
49 / 82
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
50 / 82
Refrigera
Warehouse-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 94.4 94.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 94.7 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
51 / 82
General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.1 10.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.1 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 86.2 86.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 86.4 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 94.4 94.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 94.7 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.1 10.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.1 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 86.2 86.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 86.4 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
52 / 82
Unrefrige < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.6 15.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.7 rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.67 1.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.3 14.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.3 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.7

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 94.4 94.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 94.7 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.1 10.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.1 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
53 / 82
Refrigera
Warehouse-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 86.2 86.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 86.4 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 94.4 94.4 0.01 < 0.005 — 94.7 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.1 10.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.1 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 86.2 86.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 86.4 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.6 15.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.7 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.67 1.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
54 / 82
Refrigera
Warehouse-No
Rail
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.3 14.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.3 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.7

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

1.36 1.26 0.06 7.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 43.7 Total 1.36 6.16 0.06 7.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 43.7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 4.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
55 / 82
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.22 0.21 0.01 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.72 4.72 < 0.005 0.01 — 6.54 Total 0.22 1.10 0.01 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.72 4.72 < 0.005 0.01 — 6.54

4.3.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 3.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

1.36 1.26 0.06 7.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 43.7 Total 1.36 4.98 0.06 7.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 43.7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
56 / 82
Consum — 3.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
er
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 3.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.22 0.21 0.01 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.72 4.72 < 0.005 0.01 — 6.54 Total 0.22 0.89 0.01 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.72 4.72 < 0.005 0.01 — 6.54

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
57 / 82
General——————————— 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005— 2.79
Office
Building
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005— 2.79
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005— 2.79
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005— 2.79
Annual——————————————————
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
58 / 82
Unrefrige — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.12 0.20 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.46 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.12 0.20 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.46

4.4.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.51 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
59 / 82
Refrigera
Warehouse-No
Rail
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005— 2.51
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005— 2.51
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005— 2.51
Annual——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.07 0.11 0.18 0.01 < 0.005— 0.42
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
60 / 82
Refrigera
Warehouse-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.11 0.18 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.42

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 25.1 0.00 25.1 2.51 0.00 — 87.9
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.70 0.00 0.70 0.07 0.00 — 2.44
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 63.4 0.00 63.4 6.34 0.00 — 222
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 89.3 0.00 89.3 8.92 0.00 — 312 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
61 / 82
Unrefrige — — — — — — — — — — — 25.1 0.00 25.1 2.51 0.00 — 87.9 rated
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.70 0.00 0.70 0.07 0.00 — 2.44
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 63.4 0.00 63.4 6.34 0.00 — 222
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 89.3 0.00 89.3 8.92 0.00 — 312 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 4.16 0.00 4.16 0.42 0.00 — 14.6
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.00 — 0.40
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 10.5 0.00 10.5 1.05 0.00 — 36.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 14.8 0.00 14.8 1.48 0.00 — 51.7

4.5.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
62 / 82
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.6 0.00 12.6 1.26 0.00 — 43.9
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.03 0.00 — 1.22
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 31.7 0.00 31.7 3.17 0.00 — 111
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 44.6 0.00 44.6 4.46 0.00 — 156 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.6 0.00 12.6 1.26 0.00 — 43.9
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.03 0.00 — 1.22
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
63 / 82
Refrigera — — — — — — — — — — — 31.7 0.00 31.7 3.17 0.00 — 111 ted
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 44.6 0.00 44.6 4.46 0.00 — 156 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 0.00 2.08 0.21 0.00 — 7.28
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.00 — 0.20
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 5.25 0.00 5.25 0.52 0.00 — 18.4
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 7.39 0.00 7.39 0.74 0.00 — 25.9

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
64 / 82
Unrefrige———————————————— 0.00 0.00
rated Warehou
se-No
Rail
General
Office
Building
———————————————— < 0.005 < 0.005
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————————— 3,338 3,338
Total———————————————— 3,338 3,338
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————————— 0.00 0.00
General
Office
Building
———————————————— < 0.005 < 0.005
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————————— 3,338 3,338
Total———————————————— 3,338 3,338
Annual——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————————— 0.00 0.00
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
65 / 82
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 553 553
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 553 553

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
66 / 82
Unrefrige — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
rated
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 196 196
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 196 196

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
67 / 82
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
68 / 82
Equipme
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
69 / 82

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
70 / 82

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Clearing Site Preparation 7/1/2023 7/7/2023 5.00 5.00 — Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/8/2023 7/12/2023 5.00 3.00 — Grading Grading 7/13/2023 8/16/2023 5.00 25.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 9/12/2023 5/20/2024 5.00 180 — Paving Paving 7/31/2024 8/20/2024 5.00 15.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/29/2024 9/4/2024 5.00 5.00 — Utilities Trenching 9/27/2024 11/28/2024 5.00 45.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Clearing Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
71 / 82
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Utilities Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Clearing Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Clearing Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Clearing Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
72 / 82
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 3 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 3 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Utilities Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Clearing Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Clearing — — — —
Clearing Worker 5.00 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Clearing Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Clearing Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Clearing Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 12.5 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
73 / 82
Grading Worker 10.0 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 36.0 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 73.9 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 28.9 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 14.8 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT
Utilities — — — —
Utilities Worker 5.00 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Utilities Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Utilities Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Utilities Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
74 / 82
Clearing————
Clearing Worker 5.00 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Clearing Vendor— 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Clearing Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Clearing Onsite truck—— HHDT
Site Preparation————
Site Preparation Worker 12.5 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor— 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck—— HHDT
Grading————
Grading Worker 10.0 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor— 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 36.0 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck—— HHDT
Building Construction————
Building Construction Worker 73.9 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 28.9 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck—— HHDT
Paving————
Paving Worker 15.0 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor— 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck—— HHDT
Architectural Coating————
Architectural Coating Worker 14.8 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
75 / 82
Architectural Coating Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT
Utilities — — — —
Utilities Worker 5.00 8.10 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Utilities Vendor — 6.90 HHDT,MHDT
Utilities Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Utilities Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 2,085 0.00 3,241

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Yards) Material Exported (Cubic Yards) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Clearing — — 2.50 0.00 —
Site Preparation — 0.00 1.50 0.00 —
Grading — 7,200 37.5 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.24
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
76 / 82

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
General Office Building 0.00 0%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.24 100%
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

71.8 71.8 71.8 26,193 362 362 362 132,100
General Office
Building

2.01 2.01 2.01 734 10.1 10.1 10.1 3,703
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
77 / 82
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
181 181 181 66,155 914 914 914 333,638

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

71.8 71.8 71.8 26,193 362 362 362 132,100
General Office
Building

2.01 2.01 2.01 734 10.1 10.1 10.1 3,703
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
181 181 181 66,155 914 914 914 333,638

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 264,314 88,105 3,241

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
78 / 82
Summer Days day/yr 330

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 330

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
525,405 204 0.0330 0.0040 294,690
General Office Building 29,011 204 0.0330 0.0040 31,397 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 3,017,727 204 0.0330 0.0040 268,996

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 294,690
General Office Building < 0.005 204 0.0330 0.0040 31,397 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail < 0.005 204 0.0330 0.0040 268,996 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
79 / 82

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00
General Office Building 247,050 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00
General Office Building 222,715 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 46.6 0.00
General Office Building 1.29 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 118 0.00

5.13.2. Mitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
80 / 82
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 23.3 0.00
General Office Building 0.65 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 58.9 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage User Defined 0.00 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0
General Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage R-404A 3,922 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage User Defined 0.00 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0
General Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 — 1.00
General Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 2.00 18.0
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage User Defined 2,200 7.50 7.50 2.00 25.0
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
81 / 82

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Construction: Construction Phases Based on schedule information provided by the project applicant.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment Based on equipment usage provided by the project applicant. Model defaults applied for building construction and architectural coating phases.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
82 / 82
Construction: Dust From Material Movement Based on estimated 7200 cy to be exported. No fill material to be imported.

Operations: Vehicle Data Based on trip-gen rates derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project (1.447258 trips/KSF) Operations: Consumer Products Project is not a city park or golf course, application of pesticides/fertilizers do not apply.

Operations: Water and Waste Water Storage areas not anticipated to require water use. Water use for office building area based on model defaults. Exterior landscaping negligible.

Construction: Architectural Coatings Office interior coverage area based on model defaults. Remaining interior/exterior areas constructed with prefinished materials or materials that do not require painting.

Operations: Refrigerants Unrefrigerated storage areas do not require refrigerants. Refrigerants for office and refrigerated storage based on model defaults.

Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
1 / 82
Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated

3.2. Site Preparation (2023) - Mitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
2 / 82

3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated

3.4. Site Preparation (2023) - Mitigated

3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated

3.6. Grading (2023) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2023) - Mitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.10. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated

3.11. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

3.12. Paving (2024) - Mitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

3.14. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated

3.15. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated

3.16. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
3 / 82

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.3.1. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.4.1. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.5.1. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
4 / 82

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
5 / 82

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
6 / 82

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
7 / 82

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

8. User Changes to Default Data
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
8 / 82

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Nutwood Mini Storage
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 15.6
Location 35.57850002755643, -120.70139135226397
County San Luis Obispo
City Unincorporated
Air District San Luis Obispo County APCD
Air Basin South Central Coast
TAZ 3309
EDFZ 6
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

49.6 1000sqft 1.14 49,585 0.00 — — Unrefrigerated
General Office
Building

1.39 1000sqft 0.03 1,390 0.00 — — Office
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
9 / 82
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

1.24 Acre 1.24 0.00 0.00 — — Paving
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
125 1000sqft 2.87 125,234 0.00 — — Refrigerated

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-2* Limit Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Construction C-5 Use Advanced Engine Tiers
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Construction C-13 Use Low-VOC Paints for Construction
Energy E-2 Require Energy Efficient Appliances
Energy E-10-B Establish Onsite Renewable Energy Systems: Solar Power Water W-4 Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures
Water W-7 Adopt a Water Conservation Strategy
Waste S-1/S-2 Implement Waste Reduction Plan
Refrigerants R-1 Use Alternative Refrigerants Instead of High-GWP Refrigerants Refrigerants R-5 Reduce Service Leak Emissions
Area Sources AS-1 Use Low-VOC Cleaning Supplies
Area Sources AS-2 Use Low-VOC Paints
* Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
10 / 82
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.40 9.54 21.5 17.5 0.05 0.87 2.56 3.42 0.80 1.09 1.89 — 5,166 5,166 0.24 0.46 5.47 5,315 Mit. 1.08 5.67 14.3 19.3 0.06 0.32 2.69 2.82 0.29 1.10 1.23 — 5,733 5,733 0.26 0.46 5.47 5,884 %
Reduced
55% 41% 34% -10% -10% 63% -5% 18% 64% -1% 35% — -11% -11% -10% -1% — -11% Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.92 1.62 13.1 16.3 0.03 0.56 0.59 1.15 0.52 0.15 0.66 — 3,515 3,515 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,559 Mit. 1.07 0.96 10.6 18.2 0.03 0.14 0.59 0.73 0.13 0.15 0.28 — 3,515 3,515 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,559 %
Reduced
44% 41% 19% -11% — 76% — 37% 75% — 58% — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.62 0.63 4.65 5.37 0.01 0.20 0.34 0.54 0.18 0.13 0.31 — 1,163 1,163 0.05 0.06 0.53 1,183 Mit. 0.31 0.36 3.56 5.94 0.01 0.05 0.35 0.39 0.05 0.13 0.17 — 1,203 1,203 0.05 0.06 0.53 1,224 %
Reduced
50% 42% 23% -11% — 74% -3% 27% 74% -1% 46% — -4% -4% -3% — — -3% Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.11 0.12 0.85 0.98 < 0.005 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.02 0.06 — 192 192 0.01 0.01 0.09 196 Mit. 0.06 0.07 0.65 1.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 199 199 0.01 0.01 0.09 203 %
Reduced
50% 42% 23% -11% -4% 74% -3% 27% 74% -1% 46% — -4% -4% -3% -1% — -3%

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
11 / 82
Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 2.40 1.90 21.5 17.5 0.05 0.87 2.56 3.42 0.80 1.09 1.89 — 5,166 5,166 0.24 0.46 5.47 5,315 2024 1.84 9.54 12.4 16.1 0.03 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.47 0.15 0.61 — 3,517 3,517 0.15 0.14 3.75 3,565 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.92 1.62 13.1 16.3 0.03 0.56 0.59 1.15 0.52 0.15 0.66 — 3,515 3,515 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,559 2024 1.82 1.54 12.5 16.0 0.03 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.47 0.15 0.61 — 3,498 3,498 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,542 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.62 0.51 4.65 5.04 0.01 0.20 0.34 0.54 0.18 0.13 0.31 — 1,163 1,163 0.05 0.06 0.53 1,183 2024 0.59 0.63 4.08 5.37 0.01 0.17 0.17 0.34 0.16 0.04 0.20 — 1,110 1,110 0.05 0.04 0.46 1,123 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.11 0.09 0.85 0.92 < 0.005 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.02 0.06 — 192 192 0.01 0.01 0.09 196 2024 0.11 0.12 0.74 0.98 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.04 — 184 184 0.01 0.01 0.08 186

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.08 0.96 14.3 19.3 0.06 0.27 2.69 2.82 0.25 1.10 1.23 — 5,733 5,733 0.26 0.46 5.47 5,884 2024 1.04 5.67 10.5 18.0 0.03 0.32 0.59 0.72 0.29 0.15 0.31 — 3,517 3,517 0.15 0.14 3.75 3,565 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.07 0.96 10.6 18.2 0.03 0.14 0.59 0.73 0.13 0.15 0.28 — 3,515 3,515 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,559 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
12 / 82
2024 1.03 0.91 10.5 17.9 0.03 0.13 0.59 0.72 0.12 0.15 0.27 — 3,498 3,498 0.15 0.14 0.10 3,542 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.29 0.25 3.44 5.52 0.01 0.04 0.35 0.39 0.04 0.13 0.17 — 1,203 1,203 0.05 0.06 0.53 1,224 2024 0.31 0.36 3.56 5.94 0.01 0.05 0.17 0.22 0.05 0.04 0.09 — 1,110 1,110 0.05 0.04 0.46 1,123 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.05 0.05 0.63 1.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 199 199 0.01 0.01 0.09 203 2024 0.06 0.07 0.65 1.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 184 184 0.01 0.01 0.08 186

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.45 7.19 0.81 12.4 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 89.7 3,250 3,339 9.37 0.18 3,340 6,967 Mit. 2.45 6.01 0.81 12.4 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 45.1 1,253 1,298 4.58 0.14 1,189 2,643 %
Reduced
— 16% — — — — — — — — — 50% 61% 61% 51% 22% 64% 62%
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.07 5.91 0.80 4.90 0.01 0.02 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.09 89.7 3,189 3,278 9.37 0.10 3,338 6,879 Mit. 1.07 4.73 0.80 4.90 0.01 0.02 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.09 45.1 1,192 1,237 4.58 0.06 1,186 2,555 %
Reduced
— 20% — — — — — — — — — 50% 63% 62% 51% 41% 64% 63%
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.30 7.04 0.85 11.7 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.03 0.06 0.10 89.7 3,222 3,312 9.37 0.17 3,339 6,936 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
13 / 82
Mit. 2.30 5.86 0.85 11.7 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.03 0.06 0.10 45.1 1,225 1,270 4.58 0.13 1,187 2,611 %
Reduced
— 17% — — — — — — — — — 50% 62% 62% 51% 23% 64% 62%
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.42 1.28 0.16 2.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 14.9 533 548 1.55 0.03 553 1,148 Mit. 0.42 1.07 0.16 2.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 7.46 203 210 0.76 0.02 197 432 %
Reduced
— 17% — — — — — — — — — 50% 62% 62% 51% 23% 64% 62%

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.07 1.02 0.59 4.59 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 1,030 1,030 0.06 0.05 2.83 1,050 Area 1.36 6.16 0.06 7.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 0.08 — 56.6 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 2,187 2,187 0.34 0.04 — 2,207 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.79 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 89.3 0.00 89.3 8.92 0.00 — 312 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,338 3,338
Total 2.45 7.19 0.81 12.4 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 89.7 3,250 3,339 9.37 0.18 3,340 6,967 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.05 1.00 0.64 4.77 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 1,001 1,001 0.06 0.06 0.07 1,019 Area — 4.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 2,187 2,187 0.34 0.04 — 2,207 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.79 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
14 / 82
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 89.3 0.00 89.3 8.92 0.00 — 312 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,338 3,338
Total 1.07 5.91 0.80 4.90 0.01 0.02 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.09 89.7 3,189 3,278 9.37 0.10 3,338 6,879 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.05 0.99 0.63 4.65 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 1,006 1,006 0.06 0.06 1.22 1,025 Area 1.23 6.04 0.06 6.93 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 28.5 28.5 < 0.005 0.08 — 51.2 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 2,187 2,187 0.34 0.04 — 2,207 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.47 0.75 1.22 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.79 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 89.3 0.00 89.3 8.92 0.00 — 312 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,338 3,338
Total 2.30 7.04 0.85 11.7 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.03 0.06 0.10 89.7 3,222 3,312 9.37 0.17 3,339 6,936 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.19 0.18 0.12 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 166 166 0.01 0.01 0.20 170 Area 0.22 1.10 0.01 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.72 4.72 < 0.005 0.01 — 8.47 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 362 362 0.06 0.01 — 365 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.12 0.20 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.46 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 14.8 0.00 14.8 1.48 0.00 — 51.7 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 553 553
Total 0.42 1.28 0.16 2.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 14.9 533 548 1.55 0.03 553 1,148

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.07 1.02 0.59 4.59 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 1,030 1,030 0.06 0.05 2.83 1,050 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
15 / 82
Area 1.36 4.98 0.06 7.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 0.08 — 56.6 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.51 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 44.6 0.00 44.6 4.46 0.00 — 156 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Total 2.45 6.01 0.81 12.4 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.10 45.1 1,253 1,298 4.58 0.14 1,189 2,643 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.05 1.00 0.64 4.77 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 1,001 1,001 0.06 0.06 0.07 1,019 Area — 3.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.51 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 44.6 0.00 44.6 4.46 0.00 — 156 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Total 1.07 4.73 0.80 4.90 0.01 0.02 0.36 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.09 45.1 1,192 1,237 4.58 0.06 1,186 2,555 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.05 0.99 0.63 4.65 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.37 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 1,006 1,006 0.06 0.06 1.22 1,025 Area 1.23 4.86 0.06 6.93 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 28.5 28.5 < 0.005 0.08 — 51.2 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 191 191 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.43 0.67 1.10 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.51 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 44.6 0.00 44.6 4.46 0.00 — 156 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,186 1,186
Total 2.30 5.86 0.85 11.7 0.01 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.03 0.06 0.10 45.1 1,225 1,270 4.58 0.13 1,187 2,611 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.19 0.18 0.12 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 166 166 0.01 0.01 0.20 170 Area 0.22 0.89 0.01 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.72 4.72 < 0.005 0.01 — 8.47 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.7 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
16 / 82
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.11 0.18 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.42 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 7.39 0.00 7.39 0.74 0.00 — 25.9 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 196 196
Total 0.42 1.07 0.16 2.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.02 7.46 203 210 0.76 0.02 197 432

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.52 1.27 12.8 11.2 0.02 0.58 — 0.58 0.53 — 0.53 — 1,668 1,668 0.07 0.01 — 1,674 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.70 1.70 — 0.88 0.88 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 22.9 22.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.9 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
17 / 82
Dust — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.78 3.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.80 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 32.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
18 / 82
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2. Site Preparation (2023) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.22 5.62 9.75 0.02 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 1,810 1,810 0.07 0.01 — 1,816 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.70 1.70 — 0.88 0.88 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.8 24.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.9 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.10 4.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.12 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
19 / 82
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 32.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.42 0.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
20 / 82
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.96 1.64 16.6 16.9 0.02 0.76 — 0.76 0.70 — 0.70 — 2,539 2,539 0.10 0.02 — 2,548 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.70 1.70 — 0.88 0.88 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.9 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.46 3.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.47 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
21 / 82
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.47 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 79.0 79.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37 80.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.64 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.4. Site Preparation (2023) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.74 0.65 8.42 14.4 0.02 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 2,539 2,539 0.10 0.02 — 2,548 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
22 / 82
Dust — — — — — — 1.70 1.70 — 0.88 0.88 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.9 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.46 3.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.47 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.47 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 79.0 79.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37 80.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
23 / 82
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.64 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.14 1.79 17.4 15.9 0.02 0.82 — 0.82 0.76 — 0.76 — 2,377 2,377 0.10 0.02 — 2,385 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.85 1.85 — 0.89 0.89 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
24 / 82
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.12 1.19 1.09 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 163 163 0.01 < 0.005 — 163 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.13 0.13 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.22 0.20 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 27.0 27.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.0 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.38 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 63.2 63.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 64.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.21 0.05 4.01 1.30 0.03 0.05 0.17 0.22 0.05 0.06 0.11 — 2,726 2,726 0.14 0.44 5.18 2,865 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 4.18 4.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.25 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
25 / 82
Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.28 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 187 187 0.01 0.03 0.15 196 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 32.5

3.6. Grading (2023) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.39 0.39 10.2 17.7 0.03 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 2,944 2,944 0.12 0.02 — 2,954 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.98 1.98 — 0.91 0.91 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.70 1.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 202 202 0.01 < 0.005 — 202 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.14 0.14 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Exhibit A
Attachment 2

Nutwood Mini Storage Custom Report, 1/10/2023
26 / 82
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 33.4 33.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.5 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.38 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 63.2 63.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 64.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.21 0.05 4.01 1.30 0.03 0.05 0.17 0.22 0.05 0.06 0.11 — 2,726 2,726 0.14 0.44 5.18 2,865 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 4.18 4.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.25 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.28 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 187 187 0.01 0.03 0.15 196 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 32.5 Exhibit A
Attachment 2