Agenda packet — Paso Robles City Council, September 16, 2025 (part 2 of 4)

City of Paso Robles, CA - Prod

PAID INVOICES REPORT
Report generated: 08/28/2025 16:35
User: NCarranza
Program ID: appdwarr

Page 33 ends

WARRANT #:082925 TO FISCAL 2026/02 07/01/2025 TO 06/30/2026

VENDOR NAME

DOCUMENT INV DATE VOUCHER PO CHECK NO T CHK DATE GL ACCOUNT GL ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VENDOR TOTALS 13,977.25 YTD INVOICED 29,320.50 YTD PAID 14,571.75 690 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY, INC
132981 08/26/25 134488 78414 P 08/29/25 6023601 52151 Airport-Janitorial Suppli 623.75 INVOICE: 224698
VENDOR TOTALS 1,239.05 YTD INVOICED 10,848.53 YTD PAID 623.75 REPORT TOTALS 5,241,526.76

COUNT AMOUNT
TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 102 4,728,429.58
TOTAL MANUAL CHECKS 9 513,097.18
** END OF REPORT - Generated by Nayeli Carranza **

Page 127 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles, CA - Prod

A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 08/07/2025 10:41
User: NCarranza
Program ID: apcshdsb

Page 1 ends

CASH ACCOUNT: 999 10100 GLCntrl-Warrant Acct-PPB
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME VOUCHER INVOICE INV DATE PO WARRANT # NET

DOCUMENT INVOICE DTL DESC
76332 05/23/2025 VOID 92002 SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL 130560 216580 05/12/2025 240362 -464.25 129126
Invoice: 216580 CEQA SERVICES AT LARRY MOORE PARK
-464.25 1014310 54520 C0230 LMP-Imprvmnts Other Than Bldgs CHECK 76332 TOTAL: -464.25
77347 07/11/2025 VOID 4550 ORALE TAQUERIA 132419 000511 06/26/2025 -2,936.25 130951
Invoice: 000511 CWEA EVENT
-2,936.25 6016102 52120 SwrTrtmnt-Office Expense
CHECK 77347 TOTAL: -2,936.25
NUMBER OF CHECKS 2 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** -3,400.50

COUNT AMOUNT
TOTAL VOIDED CHECKS 2 3,400.50
*** GRAND TOTAL *** -3,400.50

Page 128 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles, CA - Prod

A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 08/14/2025 14:20
User: NCarranza
Program ID: apcshdsb

Page 1 ends

CASH ACCOUNT: 999 10100 GLCntrl-Warrant Acct-PPB
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME VOUCHER INVOICE INV DATE PO WARRANT # NET

DOCUMENT INVOICE DTL DESC
77372 07/11/2025 VOID 1509 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 132400 2500-0 #2 06/30/2025 -76.16 130932
Invoice: 2500-0 #2 SUPPLIES
-76.16 1003300 52220 StMaint-Maint-General R&M
132403 2576-0 07/01/2025 -200.06
130935
Invoice: 2576-0 SUPPLIES
-200.06 1003300 52220 StMaint-Maint-General R&M
132422 3439-7 06/24/2025 -531.57
130954
Invoice: 3439-7 SUPPLIES
-531.57 6016101 52220 SewerColl-Maint-General R&M
132423 3723-4 06/30/2025 -542.45
130955
Invoice: 3723-4 SUPPLIES
-542.45 6016101 52220 SewerColl-Maint-General R&M
CHECK 77372 TOTAL: -1,350.24
NUMBER OF CHECKS 1 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** -1,350.24

COUNT AMOUNT
TOTAL VOIDED CHECKS 1 1,350.24
*** GRAND TOTAL *** -1,350.24

Page 129 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles, CA - Prod

A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 08/21/2025 09:16
User: NCarranza
Program ID: apcshdsb

Page 1 ends

CASH ACCOUNT: 999 10100 GLCntrl-Warrant Acct-PPB
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME VOUCHER INVOICE INV DATE PO WARRANT # NET

DOCUMENT INVOICE DTL DESC
77295 07/11/2025 VOID 4014 CALIF CONFERENCE OF 132465 300000061 04/24/2025 -100.00 130997
Invoice: 300000061 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL - R.PORTER
-100.00 1002200 52123 FirePrevent-Dues-Subscriptions
CHECK 77295 TOTAL: -100.00
NUMBER OF CHECKS 1 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** -100.00

COUNT AMOUNT
TOTAL VOIDED CHECKS 1 100.00
*** GRAND TOTAL *** -100.00

Page 130 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles, CA - Prod

A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 08/28/2025 13:53
User: NCarranza
Program ID: apcshdsb

Page 1 ends

CASH ACCOUNT: 999 10100 GLCntrl-Warrant Acct-PPB
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME VOUCHER INVOICE INV DATE PO WARRANT # NET

DOCUMENT INVOICE DTL DESC
77956 08/08/2025 VOID 4674 VICTOR GARCIA 133642 TMA 26-048 07/15/2025 -129.00 132139
Invoice: TMA 26-048 BLUE LINE INTERDICTION TRAINING- PER DIEM -129.00 1002110 52260 PDPtrlOps-Travel and Training
CHECK 77956 TOTAL: -129.00
NUMBER OF CHECKS 1 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** -129.00

COUNT AMOUNT
TOTAL VOIDED CHECKS 1 129.00
*** GRAND TOTAL *** -129.00

Page 131 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: Catherine Piatti, Finance Manager
Ryan Cornell, Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Subject: Receipt of Treasurer’s Report for June 2025 and Delegating Investment Authority CEQA Determination: The city finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

1. The City has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize the productive use of its assets entrusted to its care and to manage those public funds wisely and prudently. To achieve this responsibility, the City has an adopted Investment Policy to guide the investment of idle City funds.

2. California Government Code Sections 41004 and 53607 require the City to report certain investment and financial activity each month. As a result, this report presents the fund balances, receipts, and disbursements for the City’s operating cash, investment portfolio, and restricted investments for the month of June 2025. Total investment portfolio assets are shown in the attachment and reflect all investments under the care and control of the city.

3. The investment portfolio contains three components: liquidity funds, short-term and long-term portfolios. The liquidity funds are monies that are generally available to the City with little-to-no notice and include funds held in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), money markets, and California Asset Management Program (CAMP). The short-term portfolio is made up of fixed income securities that mature in less than one year and the long-term portfolio is made up of fixed income securities whose maturities are greater than one year, but less than five years.

4. PFM Asset Management LLC provides advisory services to the City for the short-term and long-term portfolios; liquidity funds are managed by the Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer.

5. The investment portfolio complies with all State laws and Council policy and provides sufficient liquidity to meet the City’s needs over the next six months.

6. Government Code Section 53607 also states the authority of the legislative body to invest or to reinvest funds of a local agency, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, may be delegated for a one-year period by the legislative body to the treasurer of the local agency, who shall thereafter assume full responsibility for those transactions until the delegation of authority is revoked or expires, and shall make a monthly report of those transactions to the legislative body. Subject to review, the legislative body may renew the delegation of authority pursuant to this section each year.

Options

1. Take no action.

2. Receive and file the Treasurer’s Report for the month of June 2025 and approve delegating investment authority to the City Treasurer.

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Page 132 of 520 ends

Analysis and Conclusions
Government Code Section 53607 requires the city to report on investment activity monthly. Additionally, Government Code Section 41004 requires that the City Treasurer submit to the City Clerk and the legislative body a written report and accounting of all receipts, disbursements, and fund balances. As a result, this report presents the fund balances, receipts, and disbursements for the City’s operating cash, investment portfolio, and restricted investments for the month of June 2025. Total investment portfolio assets are shown in the attachment and reflect all investments under the care and control of the city. In an effort to provide greater transparency relating to adherence to the City’s adopted investment policy, the attached report reflects the categories of investment instruments currently held, the maximum percentage of portfolio the policy allows for each instrument, where applicable, and the current percentage of portfolio held in each category.

The City’s total investment funds on hand as of June 30, 2025, are shown below. The City Treasurer has certified that all City investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet the City’s cash flow requirements for the next six months and follow all State and Council laws and policies.

As of 6/30/25
Investments
Beginning
Fund
Balance
Receipts Disbursements
Ending
Fund
Balance
Market
Value
Operating Cash $1,128,092 $25,487,321 $25,277,886 $1,337,526 $1,337,526 Liquidity 37,819,855 16,084,514 29,948,853 23,955,517 23,955,517 Short / Long Term 130,939,828 16,913,141 3,338,112 144,514,856 145,873,685 Total Investments 169,887,775 58,484,975 58,564,851 169,807,899 171,166,728 As of 6/30/25
Restricted
Investments
Beginning
Fund
Balance
Receipts Disbursements Ending Fund
Balance
Market
Value
Section 115 Trust* 11,070,517 14,575 2,631 11,082,461 11,740,395 OPEB Trust 11,012,424 475,569 52,055 11,435,938 11,435,938 Bond Trust 1,865,435 1,322,067 628,903 2,558,599 2,558,599 Total Restricted $23,948,376 $1,812,210 $683,588 $25,076,998 $25,734,932 *Beginning March 2024, Section 115 balances will be reported based on custodial bank statements. Prior balances were reported based on fiduciary statements.

Additionally, Government Code Section 53607 states the authority of the legislative body to invest or to reinvest funds of a local agency, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, may be delegated for a one-year period by the legislative body to the treasurer of the local agency, who shall thereafter assume full responsibility for those transactions until the delegation of authority is revoked or expires, and shall make a monthly report of those transactions to the legislative body. Subject to review, the legislative body may renew the delegation of authority pursuant to this section each year. This delegation used to be approved annually in conjunction with the annual review of the Investment Policy. With the most recent updates to the Investment Policy, the requirement of an annual review of the policy was updated with the criteria of “from time-to-time”. This was because generally speaking, the Investment Policy does not

Page 133 of 520 ends

need to change (and had not changed) from one year to the next, but rather changes should be made when needed and necessary, such as in the instance when the State updates the Government Code regarding investments. The delegation of investment authority will now be brought before the City Council in conjunction with the June Treasurer’s Report, typically towards the beginning of each fiscal year.

Fiscal Impact
None
CEQA
The city finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Recommendation
Receive and file the Monthly Treasurer’s Report for June 2025 and approve Resolution 25-XXX, delegating investment authority to the City Treasurer.

Attachments

1. June 2025 Treasurer’s Report

2. Resolution 25-XXX – Delegation of Investment Authority

Page 134 of 520 ends

Fund Name Face Amount/Shares Market Value Book Value % of Portfolio YTM @ Cost Days To Maturity Asset-Backed Securities 20% 596,980.51 589,924.20 589,621.58 0.35 4.31 513 CD | Negotiable 30% 800,000.00 811,116.96 800,000.00 0.47 5.08 382 Corporate Notes 30% 24,720,000.00 24,839,895.87 24,362,124.45 14.46 4.46 1,064 LGIP | Fixed Asset 25,448,852.60 25,448,852.60 25,448,852.60 15.10 4.24 229 LGIP | LAIF 4,515,841.41 4,515,841.41 4,515,841.41 2.68 4.27 1 LGIP | Liquid Asset 19,439,675.73 19,439,675.73 19,439,675.73 11.54 4.40 1 Money Market Funds 20% 9,597.40 9,597.40 9,597.40 0.01 3.95 1 US Agency 855,000.00 847,209.74 852,426.45 0.51 0.44 85 US Treasury 94,634,000.00 94,136,787.92 92,463,250.79 54.88 3.74 985 Total / Average 171,019,947.65 170,638,901.83 168,481,390.41 100.00 4.00 733 This report presents the City’s investment portfolio as of June 30, 2025. Total portfolio assets are shown in the chart below and reflects all investments under the care and control of the City. It does not include funds held by in trust on behalf of the City; i.e. bond reserve funds, deferred compensation plans, Section 115 Trust plan and other post-retirement benefit funds.

The portfolio contains three components; liquidity funds, short-term and long-term portfolios. The liquidity fund are monies that are generally available to the City with little or no notice. Liquidity funds include Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), money market and California Asset Management Program (CAMP). The short-term portfolio is made up of fixed income securities that mature in less than one (1) year and the long-term portfolio is made up of fixed income securities whose maturities are greater than one (1) year and less than five (5) years.

PFM Asset Management LLC (PFM) provides advisory services to the City for the short-term and long-term portfolios. All PFM trades must be approved in advance by the Treasurer. Liquidity funds are managed by the Treasurer.

The investment portfolio is in compliance with all State laws and provides sufficient liquidity to meet the City's needs over the next six months.

Total Funds on hand at June 30, 2025 included the following and are listed be type:

CITY OF PASO ROBLES

MONTHLY TREASURERS REPORT
JUNE 30, 2025
1 Attachment 1

Page 135 of 520 ends

Month Market Value Book Value Unrealized Gain/Loss YTM @ Cost YTM @ Market Duration Days To Maturity 11/30/2024 152,696,929.85 152,460,676.25 236,253.60 3.77 4.36 1.86 734 12/31/2024 154,711,720.13 154,775,445.26 -63,725.13 3.83 4.42 1.84 724 1/31/2025 161,879,442.22 161,712,230.95 167,211.27 3.85 4.34 1.81 711 2/28/2025 165,205,899.23 164,142,521.43 1,063,377.80 3.91 4.17 1.79 704 3/31/2025 165,133,465.39 163,824,221.49 1,309,243.90 3.96 4.14 1.79 703 4/30/2025 162,390,030.30 160,260,627.44 2,129,402.86 3.95 3.95 1.93 761 5/31/2025 170,244,687.73 168,770,291.11 1,474,396.62 3.95 4.13 1.79 706 6/30/2025 170,638,901.83 168,481,390.41 2,157,511.42 4.00 4.01 1.87 732 Total / Average 162,862,634.59 161,803,425.54 1,059,209.04 3.90 4.19 1.83 722 Market Value / Book Value Comparison
Begin Date: 11/30/2024, End Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Summary by Month
City of Paso Robles
2 Attachment 1

Page 136 of 520 ends

Main Fund Allocation
Main Fund
Book Value
5/31/2025
% of Portfolio
5/31/2025
Book Value
6/30/2025
% of Portfolio
6/30/2025
Asset-Backed Securities 20% 590,394.19 0.35 589,621.58 0.35 CD | Negotiable 30% 800,000.00 0.47 800,000.00 0.47
Corporate Notes 30% 23,083,818.25 13.68 24,362,124.45 14.46 LGIP | Fixed Asset 12,000,000.00 7.11 25,448,852.60 15.10 LGIP | LAIF 19,995,841.41 11.85 4,515,841.41 2.68
LGIP | Liquid Asset 17,824,014.00 10.56 19,439,675.73 11.54 US Agency 2,817,935.75 1.67 852,426.45 0.51
US Treasury 91,658,287.51 54.31 92,463,250.79 54.88
Money Market Funds 20% 0.00 0.00 9,597.40 0.01
Total / Average 168,770,291.11 100.00 168,481,390.41 100.00 Portfolio Holdings as of 5/31/2025 Portfolio Holdings as of 6/30/2025 Begin Date: 5/31/2025, End Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Distribution by Main Fund - Book Value
City of Paso Robles
3 Attachment 1

Page 137 of 520 ends

Main Fund Allocation
Main Fund
Market Value
5/31/2025
% of Portfolio
5/31/2025
Market Value
6/30/2025
% of Portfolio
6/30/2025
Asset-Backed Securities 20% 589,417.80 0.35 589,924.20 0.35 CD | Negotiable 30% 809,744.80 0.48 811,116.96 0.48
Corporate Notes 30% 23,458,880.67 13.78 24,839,895.87 14.56 LGIP | Fixed Asset 12,000,000.00 7.05 25,448,852.60 14.91 LGIP | LAIF 19,995,841.41 11.75 4,515,841.41 2.65
LGIP | Liquid Asset 17,824,014.00 10.47 19,439,675.73 11.39 US Agency 2,782,360.73 1.63 847,209.74 0.50
US Treasury 92,784,428.32 54.50 94,136,787.92 55.17
Money Market Funds 20% 0.00 0.00 9,597.40 0.01
Total / Average 170,244,687.73 100.00 170,638,901.83 100.00 Portfolio Holdings as of 5/31/2025 Portfolio Holdings as of 6/30/2025 Begin Date: 5/31/2025, End Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Distribution by Main Fund - Market Value
City of Paso Robles
4 Attachment 1

Page 138 of 520 ends

Buy Transactions
Buy 6/2/2025 CAMP05-19-26 13,448,852.60 CAMP TERM 4.27 5/19/2026 100.00 13,448,852.60 0.00 4.27 13,448,852.60 Buy 6/5/2025 91282CHF1 1,955,000.00 T-Note 3.75 5/31/2030 98.88 1,933,158.98 1,001.54 4.00 1,934,160.52 Buy 6/30/2025 49177JAF9 635,000.00 Kenvue INC 5.05 3/22/2028-28 102.36 649,992.35 8,729.49 4.12 658,721.84 Buy 6/30/2025 58933YAX3 645,000.00 Merck & Co INC 3.4 3/7/2029-29 97.41 628,313.85 6,883.58 4.16 635,197.43 Subtotal 16,683,852.60 16,660,317.78 16,614.61 16,676,932.39 Deposit 6/2/2025 MM9730 30.20 Zions Bank MM 100.00 30.20 0.00 0.00 30.20 Deposit 6/30/2025 CAMP1001 64,514.33 CAMP LGIP 100.00 64,514.33 0.00 0.00 64,514.33 Deposit 6/30/2025 CAMP1001 1,551,147.40 CAMP LGIP 100.00 1,551,147.40 0.00 0.00 1,551,147.40 Deposit 6/30/2025 MM9730 9,597.40 Zions Bank MM 100.00 9,597.40 0.00 0.00 9,597.40 Subtotal 1,625,289.33 1,625,289.33 0.00 1,625,289.33
Total Buy Transactions 18,309,141.93 18,285,607.11 16,614.61 18,302,221.72 Interest/Dividends
Interest 6/1/2025 3137BTUMI 0.00 FHLMC MBS 3.347 11/25/2026 0.00 1,668.48 0.00 1,668.48 Interest 6/1/2025 57636QAM6 0.00 Mastercard Inc 2.95 6/1/2029-29 0.00 6,785.00 0.00 6,785.00 Interest 6/2/2025 MM9730 0.00 Zions Bank MM 0.00 30.20 0.00 30.20 Interest 6/8/2025 48125LRU8 0.00 JP Morgan Bank NA 5.11 12/8/2026-26 0.00 25,550.00 0.00 25,550.00 Interest 6/30/2025 912828ZV5 0.00 T-Note 0.5 6/30/2027 0.00 2,100.00 0.00 2,100.00 Interest 6/30/2025 91282CHK0 0.00 T-Note 4 6/30/2028 0.00 17,800.00 0.00 17,800.00 Interest 6/30/2025 91282CMD0 0.00 T-Note 4.375 12/31/2029 0.00 49,656.25 0.00 49,656.25 Interest 6/30/2025 91282CKX8 0.00 T-Note 4.25 6/30/2029 0.00 61,178.75 0.00 61,178.75 Interest 6/30/2025 91282CJR3 0.00 T-Note 3.75 12/31/2028 0.00 31,500.00 0.00 31,500.00 Interest 6/30/2025 91282CDQ1 0.00 T-Note 1.25 12/31/2026 0.00 25,906.25 0.00 25,906.25 Interest 6/30/2025 CAMP1001 0.00 CAMP LGIP 0.00 64,514.33 0.00 64,514.33 Interest 6/30/2025 91282CBB6 0.00 T-Note 0.625 12/31/2027 0.00 5,937.50 0.00 5,937.50 Interest 6/30/2025 9128287B0 0.00 T-Note 1.875 6/30/2026 0.00 15,187.50 0.00 15,187.50 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 307,814.26 307,814.26
Total Interest/Dividends 0.00 0.00 307,814.26 307,814.26 Settlement Date CUSIP Description Principal YTM @ Cost
Face Amount /
Action Shares Purchase Price
Interest /
Dividends Total
Begin Date: 5/31/2025, End Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Transaction Summary by Action
City of Paso Robles
5 Attachment 1

Page 139 of 520 ends

Sell Transactions
Principal Pay Down 6/25/2025 3137BTUMI 1,218.86 FHLMC MBS 3.347 11/25/2026 0.00 1,218.86 0.00 0.00 1,218.86 Subtotal 1,218.86 1,218.86 0.00 1,218.86
Sell 6/5/2025 3135G06G3 500,000.00 FNMA 0.5 11/7/2025 0.00 491,990.00 194.44 0.00 492,184.44 Sell 6/5/2025 3135G06G3 570,000.00 FNMA 0.5 11/7/2025 0.00 560,868.60 221.67 0.00 561,090.27 Sell 6/5/2025 3135G06G3 900,000.00 FNMA 0.5 11/7/2025 0.00 885,582.00 350.00 0.00 885,932.00 Sell 6/30/2025 9128286A3 430,000.00 T-Note 2.625 1/31/2026 0.00 426,086.33 4,677.14 0.00 430,763.47 Sell 6/30/2025 91282CMN8 645,000.00 T-Note 4.25 2/15/2028 0.00 653,264.06 10,222.89 0.00 663,486.95 Subtotal 3,045,000.00 3,017,790.99 15,666.14 3,033,457.13 Withdraw 6/3/2025 MM9730 30.20 Zions Bank MM 0.00 30.20 0.00 0.00 30.20 Withdraw 6/30/2025 LAIF0271 15,480,000.00 LAIF LGIP 0.00 15,480,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,480,000.00 Subtotal 15,480,030.20 15,480,030.20 0.00 15,480,030.20 Total Sell Transactions 18,526,249.06 18,499,040.05 15,666.14 18,514,706.19 Settlement Date CUSIP Description Principal YTM @ Cost
Face Amount /
Action Shares Purchase Price
Interest /
Dividends Total
Begin Date: 5/31/2025, End Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Transaction Summary by Action
City of Paso Robles
6 Attachment 1

Page 140 of 520 ends

Asset-Backed Securities 20%
3137BTUMI
FHLMC MBS 3.347 11/25/2026
596,980.51
5/24/2023

4.31 589,621.58
578,604.71 98.82

4.16 1,609.58
589,924.20
302.62

0.35%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.26 513
513

1.26 0.35%
302.62
589,924.20

4.16 1,609.58
578,604.71
Sub Total Asset-Backed Securities 20% 596,980.51 4.31 589,621.58 CD | Negotiable 30%
21684LGS5
Cooperatieve Centrale 5.08 7/17/2026
800,000.00
7/20/2023

5.08 800,000.00
800,000.00 101.39

3.71 18,175.11
811,116.96
11,116.96

0.47%
FDIC Insured
FDIC Insured

1.01 382
382

1.01 0.47%
11,116.96
811,116.96

3.71 18,175.11
800,000.00
Sub Total CD | Negotiable 30% 800,000.00 5.08 800,000.00 Corporate Notes 30%
00724PAF6
Adobe Inc 4.8 4/4/2029-29
465,000.00
4/4/2024

4.83 464,307.15
464,307.15 102.53

4.07 5,332.00
476,767.84
12,460.69

0.28%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.45 1343
00724PAF6
Adobe Inc 4.8 4/4/2029-29
380,000.00
4/5/2024

4.77 380,501.60
380,501.60 102.53

4.07 4,357.33
389,616.73
9,115.13

0.23%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.45 1343
02079KAC1
Alphabet Inc 1.998 8/15/2026-26
980,000.00
1/30/2023

4.05 914,163.60
914,163.60 97.83

3.99 7,342.65
958,734.21
44,570.61

0.54%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aa2

1.11 319
023135BC9
Amazon.Com INC 3.15 8/22/2027
370,000.00
11/3/2022

4.81 343,863.20
343,863.20 98.36

3.95 4,144.00
363,939.25
20,076.05

0.2%
S&P-AA
Moodys-A1

2.07 783
037833ET3
Apple Inc 4 5/10/2028-28
1,230,000.00
5/18/2023

3.94 1,233,198.00
1,233,198.00 100.34

3.87 6,833.33
1,234,185.52
987.52

0.73%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.72 1015
06051GMK2
Bank of America Corp 4.979 1/24/2029
470,000.00
4/2/2025

4.66 475,207.60
475,207.60 101.39

4.55 10,140.56
476,510.75
1,303.15

0.28%
S&P-AMoodys-A1

3.25 1304
06051GJS9
Bank of America Corp Var. Corp 7/22/2027 -
26 495,000.00
8/4/2022

1.73 446,381.10
446,381.10 97.19

1.73 3,767.11
481,091.57
34,710.47

0.26%
S&P-AMoodys-A2
0 387
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
7 Attachment 1

Page 141 of 520 ends

06406RAB3
Bank of NY Mellon Corp 3.442 2/7/2028-27
1,750,000.00
8/7/2024

4.33 1,700,195.00
1,700,195.00 98.87

3.90 23,926.68
1,730,288.47
30,093.47

1.01%
S&P-A
Moodys-A1

2.48 587
09290DAA9
Blackrock Funding INC 4.7 3/14/2029-29
105,000.00
3/14/2024

4.74 104,809.95
104,809.95 102.11

4.08 1,453.08
107,212.20
2,402.25

0.06%
S&P-AAMoodys-Aa3

3.4 1325
14913R3B1
Caterpillar Finl Svcs Corp 4.8 1/6/2026-25
600,000.00
1/27/2023

4.32 607,812.00
607,812.00 100.16

4.47 13,920.00
600,984.10
-6,827.90

0.36%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

0.5 159
17275RBX9
Cisco Systems INC 4.75 2/24/2030-30
1,750,000.00
4/22/2025

4.45 1,772,610.00
1,772,610.00 102.21

4.22 29,093.75
1,788,720.13
16,110.13

1.05%
S&P-AAMoodys-A1

4.17 1669
17325FBB3
Citibank 5.803 9/29/2028-28
1,345,000.00
9/29/2023

5.80 1,345,000.00
1,345,000.00 104.55

4.29 19,729.39
1,406,148.29
61,148.29

0.8%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3

2.97 1156
532457CQ9
Eli Lilly & Co 4.2 8/14/2029-29
195,000.00
8/14/2024

4.25 194,572.95
194,572.95 100.36

4.10 3,094.00
195,700.97
1,128.02

0.12%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.77 1475
532457CQ9
Eli Lilly & Co 4.2 8/14/2029-29
680,000.00
8/14/2024

4.17 680,992.80
680,992.80 100.36

4.10 10,789.33
682,444.39
1,451.59

0.4%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.77 1475
38151LAG5
Goldman Sachs Bank 5.414 5/21/2027
880,000.00
5/22/2025

5.08 885,535.20
885,535.20 100.82

4.95 5,161.35
887,219.12
1,683.92

0.53%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

1.81 690
427866BH0
Hershey Company 4.25 5/4/2028-28
615,000.00
5/18/2023

4.07 619,969.20
619,969.20 100.79

3.95 4,065.83
619,863.26
-105.94

0.37%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.69 1009
437076BT8
Home Depot Inc 2.8 9/14/2027-27
650,000.00
1/30/2023

4.16 613,210.00
613,210.00 97.41

4.04 5,358.89
633,179.76
19,969.76

0.36%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.14 714
24422EXB0
John Deere Capital 4.95 7/14/2028
125,000.00
7/14/2023

4.64 126,700.00
126,700.00 102.43

4.09 2,853.12
128,039.96
1,339.96

0.08%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.8 1110
24422EXB0
John Deere Capital 4.95 7/14/2028
290,000.00
7/14/2023

4.98 289,567.90
289,567.90 102.43

4.09 6,619.25
297,052.71
7,484.81

0.17%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.8 1110
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
8 Attachment 1

Page 142 of 520 ends

24422EXB0
John Deere Capital 4.95 7/14/2028
225,000.00
7/18/2023

4.73 227,205.00
227,205.00 102.43

4.09 5,135.62
230,471.93
3,266.93

0.13%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.8 1110
478160CN2
Johnson & Johnson 0.55 9/1/2025-25
440,000.00
9/24/2020

0.49 441,262.80
441,262.80 99.36

4.37 799.94
437,165.83
-4,096.97

0.26%

S&P-AAA
Moodys-Aaa

0.17 32
48125LRU8
JP Morgan Bank NA 5.11 12/8/2026-26
1,000,000.00
12/8/2023

5.11 1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00 101.26

4.20 3,122.78
1,012,604.20
12,604.20

0.59%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa2

1.4 496
46647PCW4
JP Morgan Chase & CO 2.947 2/24/2028-27
350,000.00
9/18/2023

5.13 320,029.50
320,029.50 97.70

3.87 3,610.08
341,965.73
21,936.23

0.19%
S&P-AMoodys-A1

2.54 604
46647PEG7
JPMorgan Chase & Co 5.581 4/22/2030
425,000.00
4/28/2025

4.87 438,221.75
438,221.75 103.82

4.68 4,480.30
441,231.68
3,009.93

0.26%
S&P-A
Moodys-A1

4.26 1757
49177JAF9
Kenvue INC 5.05 3/22/2028-28
635,000.00
6/30/2025

4.12 649,992.35
649,992.35 102.40

4.11 8,729.49
650,209.34
216.99

0.39%
S&P-A
Moodys-A1

2.55 967
57636QAM6
Mastercard Inc 2.95 6/1/2029-29
460,000.00
6/27/2024

4.82 422,620.40
422,620.40 96.06

4.05 1,093.14
441,869.85
19,249.45

0.25%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3

3.72 1401
57636QBF0
Mastercard Incorporated 4.55 3/15/2028-28
440,000.00
3/3/2025

4.26 443,586.00
443,586.00 101.37

4.01 6,840.17
446,013.45
2,427.45

0.26%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3

2.54 960
58933YAX3
Merck & Co INC 3.4 3/7/2029-29
645,000.00
6/30/2025

4.16 628,313.85
628,313.85 97.56

4.12 6,883.58
629,235.01
921.16

0.37%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3

3.46 1318
61690U8B9
Morgan Stanley Bank Var. Corp 5/26/2028 -
27 375,000.00
5/30/2024

5.50 375,000.00
375,000.00 102.08

5.50 1,949.33
382,788.21
7,788.21

0.22%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3
0 695
61690U8B9
Morgan Stanley Bank Var. Corp 5/26/2028 -
27 725,000.00
5/31/2024

5.50 726,529.75
726,529.75 102.08

5.50 3,768.71
740,057.20
13,527.45

0.43%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3
0 695
69371RS56
Paccar Finanical 5.05 8/10/2026
650,000.00
8/11/2023

4.88 652,990.00
652,990.00 101.04

4.08 12,765.28
656,743.16
3,753.16

0.39%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

1.07 406
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
9 Attachment 1

Page 143 of 520 ends

713448FX1
PepsiCo INC 4.5 7/17/2029-29
565,000.00
7/17/2024

4.54 564,124.25
564,124.25 101.54

4.08 11,511.88
573,705.64
9,581.39

0.33%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.67 1448
713448GB8
PEPSICO INC 4.6 2/7/2030-30
220,000.00
2/7/2025

4.64 219,630.40
219,630.40 101.83

4.16 4,019.89
224,017.16
4,386.76

0.13%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

4.13 1652
713448GB8
PEPSICO INC 4.6 2/7/2030-30
565,000.00
4/30/2025

4.23 573,859.20
573,859.20 101.83

4.16 10,323.81
575,316.81
1,457.61

0.34%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

4.13 1652
69353RFG8
PNC Bank NA 3.1 10/25/2027
735,000.00
12/8/2022

4.39 693,884.10
693,884.10 97.53

4.23 4,113.96
716,853.40
22,969.30

0.41%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.24 847
857477CN1
State Street Corp 4.53 2/20/2029-29
235,000.00
8/20/2024

4.53 235,000.00
235,000.00 100.78

4.29 3,844.21
236,836.60
1,836.60

0.14%
S&P-A
Moodys-A1

3.34 1300
89236TMK8
Toyota Motor Credit Corp 4.55 8/9/2029
160,000.00
8/9/2024

4.58 159,816.00
159,816.00 100.76

4.35 2,871.56
161,212.30
1,396.30

0.09%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.73 1501
89236TMK8
Toyota Motor Credit Corp 4.55 8/9/2029
190,000.00
8/9/2024

4.64 189,219.10
189,219.10 100.76

4.35 3,409.97
191,439.61
2,220.51

0.11%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.73 1501
89236TMK8
Toyota Motor Credit Corp 4.55 8/9/2029
75,000.00
8/9/2024

4.60 74,847.75
74,847.75 100.76

4.35 1,346.04
75,568.27
720.52

0.04%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.73 1501
89236TLB9
Toyota Motor Credit Corp 5.25 9/11/2028
400,000.00
9/11/2023

5.29 399,304.00
399,304.00 103.16

4.18 6,358.33
412,649.70
13,345.70

0.24%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

2.94 1169
931142ER0
Walmart Inc 1.05 9/17/2026-26
1,030,000.00
1/30/2023

4.14 923,601.00
923,601.00 96.64

3.91 3,094.29
995,383.61
71,782.61

0.55%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aa2

1.21 413
931142FN8
WalMart INC 4.35 4/28/2030-30
250,000.00
4/28/2025

4.39 249,567.50
249,567.50 101.11

4.09 1,872.92
252,768.11
3,200.61

0.15%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aa2

4.38 1732
931142FN8
WalMart INC 4.35 4/28/2030-30
550,000.00
5/2/2025

4.15 554,922.50
554,922.50 101.11

4.09 4,120.42
556,089.84
1,167.34

0.33%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aa2

4.38 1732
987

2.54 14.43%
477,771.42
24,839,895.87

4.17 284,047.35
24,362,124.45
Sub Total Corporate Notes 30% 24,720,000.00 4.46 24,362,124.45 CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
10 Attachment 1

Page 144 of 520 ends

LGIP | Fixed Asset
CAMP10-31-25
CAMP TERM 4.21 10/31/2025
12,000,000.00
1/3/2025

4.21 12,000,000.00
12,000,000.00 100.00

4.21 246,371.51
12,000,000.00

0.00 7.12%
NR
NR

0.34 123
CAMP05-19-26
CAMP TERM 4.27 5/19/2026
13,448,852.60
6/2/2025

4.27 13,448,852.60
13,448,852.60 100.00

4.27 44,053.28
13,448,852.60

0.00 7.98%
NR
NR

0.88 323
229

0.63 15.1%

0.00 25,448,852.60

4.24 290,424.79
25,448,852.60
Sub Total LGIP | Fixed Asset 25,448,852.60 4.24 25,448,852.60 LGIP | LAIF
LAIF0271

LAIF LGIP
4,515,841.41
12/31/2019

4.27 4,515,841.41
4,515,841.41 100.00

4.27 4,515,841.41

0.00 2.68%
NR
NR
0 1
1 0

2.68%

0.00 4,515,841.41

4.27 4,515,841.41
Sub Total LGIP | LAIF 4,515,841.41 4.27 4,515,841.41
LGIP | Liquid Asset
CAMP1001

CAMP LGIP
19,439,675.73
12/31/2019

4.40 19,439,675.73
19,439,675.73 100.00

4.40 19,439,675.73

0.00 11.54%
NR
NR
0 1
1 0

11.54%

0.00 19,439,675.73

4.40 19,439,675.73
Sub Total LGIP | Liquid Asset 19,439,675.73 4.40 19,439,675.73 Money Market Funds 20%
MM9730
Zions Bank MM
9,597.40
2/1/2020

3.95 9,597.40
9,597.40 100.00

3.95 9,597.40

0.00 0.01%
NR
NR
0 1
1 0

0.01%

0.00 9,597.40

3.95 9,597.40
Sub Total Money Market Funds 20% 9,597.40 3.95 9,597.40 US Agency
3137EAEX3
FHLMC 0.375 9/23/2025
855,000.00
9/25/2020

0.44 852,426.45
852,426.45 99.09

4.36 863.91
847,209.74
-5,216.71

0.51%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.23 85
85 0.23

0.51%
-5,216.71
847,209.74

4.36 863.91
852,426.45
Sub Total US Agency 855,000.00 0.44 852,426.45
US Treasury
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
11 Attachment 1

Page 145 of 520 ends

91282CBH3
T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026
635,000.00
7/7/2021

0.80 622,796.09
622,796.09 97.80

4.22 986.71
621,016.36
-1,779.73

0.37%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.58 215
91282CBH3
T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026
1,700,000.00
1/6/2022

1.27 1,639,703.13
1,639,703.13 97.80

4.22 2,641.57
1,662,563.49
22,860.36

0.97%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.58 215
91282CBH3
T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026
765,000.00
2/22/2022

1.82 723,193.95
723,193.95 97.80

4.22 1,188.71
748,153.57
24,959.62

0.43%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.58 215
91282CBH3
T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026
1,105,000.00
5/4/2022

2.95 1,004,859.38
1,004,859.38 97.80

4.22 1,717.02
1,080,666.27
75,806.89

0.6%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.58 215
91282CAU5
T-Note 0.5 10/31/2027
2,170,000.00
1/6/2023

3.91 1,847,975.39
1,847,975.39 92.86

3.72 1,798.51
2,015,133.20
167,157.81

1.1%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.32 853
91282CBQ3
T-Note 0.5 2/28/2026
1,680,000.00
3/5/2021

0.71 1,662,609.38
1,662,609.38 97.60

4.17 2,784.78
1,639,722.66
-22,886.72

0.99%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.67 243
91282CBQ3
T-Note 0.5 2/28/2026
1,635,000.00
12/7/2021

1.16 1,590,867.77
1,590,867.77 97.60

4.17 2,710.19
1,595,801.51
4,933.74

0.94%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.67 243
912828ZN3
T-Note 0.5 4/30/2027
610,000.00
8/4/2022

2.89 545,973.83
545,973.83 94.28

3.76 505.57
575,115.63
29,141.80

0.32%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.83 669
912828ZV5
T-Note 0.5 6/30/2027
840,000.00
8/10/2022

2.99 745,434.38
745,434.38 93.84

3.73 0.00
788,221.88
42,787.50

0.44%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.99 730
91282CBB6
T-Note 0.625 12/31/2027
1,900,000.00
1/25/2024

4.09 1,663,242.19
1,663,242.19 92.70

3.71 0.00
1,761,285.16
98,042.97

0.99%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

2.48 914
91282CCF6
T-Note 0.75 5/31/2026
1,210,000.00
6/4/2021

0.82 1,206,171.48
1,206,171.48 97.06

4.05 743.85
1,174,397.17
-31,774.31

0.72%
Moodys-Aaa
S&P-AA+

0.92 335
91282CCF6
T-Note 0.75 5/31/2026
905,000.00
6/8/2022

2.99 829,418.36
829,418.36 97.06

4.05 556.35
878,371.43
48,953.07

0.49%
Moodys-Aaa
S&P-AA+

0.92 335
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
12 Attachment 1

Page 146 of 520 ends

91282CCZ2
T-Note 0.875 9/30/2026
1,075,000.00
4/7/2022

2.77 989,797.85
989,797.85 96.32

3.91 2,338.71
1,035,485.35
45,687.50

0.59%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.24 457
91282CCV1
T-Note 1.125 8/31/2028
1,160,000.00
11/3/2023

4.69 983,507.81
983,507.81 92.32

3.72 4,326.36
1,070,915.62
87,407.81

0.58%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.11 1158
91282CDQ1
T-Note 1.25 12/31/2026
1,385,000.00
1/30/2023

3.71 1,262,027.15
1,262,027.15 96.25

3.84 0.00
1,333,116.60
71,089.45

0.75%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.49 549
91282CDQ1
T-Note 1.25 12/31/2026
2,760,000.00
2/10/2023

3.95 2,494,026.56
2,494,026.56 96.25

3.84 0.00
2,656,607.80
162,581.24

1.48%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.49 549
91282CBZ3
T-Note 1.25 4/30/2028
1,865,000.00
1/25/2024

4.08 1,660,287.11
1,660,287.11 93.45

3.71 3,864.30
1,742,755.07
82,467.96

0.99%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

2.79 1035
9128287B0
T-Note 1.875 6/30/2026
1,620,000.00
5/18/2023

3.69 1,533,937.50
1,533,937.50 97.91

4.02 0.00
1,586,207.80
52,270.30

0.91%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa
1 365
912828V98
T-Note 2.25 2/15/2027
1,155,000.00
7/7/2022

2.85 1,125,132.42
1,125,132.42 97.55

3.81 9,691.47
1,126,756.65
1,624.23

0.67%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.59 595
9128282R0
T-Note 2.25 8/15/2027
2,180,000.00
9/6/2022

3.40 2,066,827.34
2,066,827.34 96.99

3.74 18,292.13
2,114,344.53
47,517.19

1.23%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.07 776
9128286A3
T-Note 2.625 1/31/2026
375,000.00
2/8/2021

0.46 414,887.70
414,887.70 99.08

4.23 4,078.90
371,550.29
-43,337.41

0.25%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.58 215
91282CEN7
T-Note 2.75 4/30/2027
1,285,000.00
5/5/2023

3.50 1,249,260.94
1,249,260.94 98.22

3.76 5,857.57
1,262,110.94
12,850.00

0.74%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.79 669
9128284N7
T-Note 2.875 5/15/2028
1,735,000.00
1/11/2024

4.01 1,657,060.55
1,657,060.55 97.75

3.71 6,235.16
1,696,030.27
38,969.72

0.98%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

2.77 1050
91282CGH8
T-Note 3.5 1/31/2028
1,755,000.00
6/5/2023

3.76 1,735,461.91
1,735,461.91 99.48

3.71 25,452.35
1,745,882.23
10,420.32

1.03%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.46 945
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
13 Attachment 1

Page 147 of 520 ends

91282CGH8
T-Note 3.5 1/31/2028
2,555,000.00
2/8/2024

4.16 2,493,520.31
2,493,520.31 99.48

3.71 37,054.56
2,541,725.98
48,205.67

1.48%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.46 945
91282CHA2
T-Note 3.5 4/30/2028
485,000.00
5/1/2023

3.60 482,821.29
482,821.29 99.45

3.71 2,813.79
482,309.76
-511.53

0.29%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.71 1035
91282CLN9
T-Note 3.5 9/30/2029
470,000.00
10/3/2024

3.56 468,733.20
468,733.20 98.97

3.76 4,090.03
465,153.13
-3,580.07

0.28%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.95 1553
91282CGT2
T-Note 3.625 3/31/2028
1,230,000.00
5/5/2023

3.41 1,241,963.67
1,241,963.67 99.81

3.70 11,085.96
1,227,693.75
-14,269.92

0.74%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.62 1005
91282CLK5
T-Note 3.625 8/31/2029
1,345,000.00
9/5/2024

3.58 1,347,784.57
1,347,784.57 99.49

3.76 16,163.76
1,338,117.38
-9,667.19

0.8%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.86 1523
91282CJR3
T-Note 3.75 12/31/2028
1,680,000.00
1/11/2024

3.97 1,663,725.00
1,663,725.00 100.06

3.73 0.00
1,681,050.00
17,325.00

0.99%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

3.31 1280
91282CGV7
T-Note 3.75 4/15/2026
1,240,000.00
5/5/2023

3.63 1,244,262.50
1,244,262.50 99.74

4.08 9,655.74
1,236,742.58
-7,519.92

0.74%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.78 289
91282CHF1
T-Note 3.75 5/31/2030
1,955,000.00
6/5/2025

4.00 1,933,158.98
1,933,158.98 99.77

3.80 6,009.22
1,950,417.97
17,258.99

1.15%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aa1

4.52 1796
91282CGE5
T-Note 3.875 1/15/2026
290,000.00
1/18/2024

4.21 288,153.52
288,153.52 99.87

4.12 5,153.11
289,614.85
1,461.33

0.17%
None
None

0.53 199
91282CMZ1
T-Note 3.875 4/30/2030
625,000.00
5/1/2025

3.69 630,297.85
630,297.85 100.38

3.79 4,047.52
627,343.75
-2,954.10

0.37%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.43 1765
91282CJT9
T-Note 4 1/15/2027
1,665,000.00
1/18/2024

4.01 1,664,414.65
1,664,414.65 100.23

3.84 30,540.33
1,668,902.34
4,487.69

0.99%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

1.48 564
91282CJW2
T-Note 4 1/31/2029
2,505,000.00
2/8/2024

4.10 2,493,649.22
2,493,649.22 100.89

3.73 41,519.34
2,527,212.31
33,563.09

1.48%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aa

3.32 1311
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
14 Attachment 1

Page 148 of 520 ends

91282CGL9
T-Note 4 2/15/2026
2,535,000.00
3/6/2023

4.61 2,493,014.06
2,493,014.06 99.87

4.21 37,814.92
2,531,657.96
38,643.90

1.48%
None
Moodys-Aaa

0.62 230
91282CGQ8
T-Note 4 2/28/2030
410,000.00
3/5/2025

3.98 410,288.28
410,288.28 100.96

3.77 5,436.96
413,923.83
3,635.55

0.24%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.25 1704
91282CGP0
T-Note 4 2/29/2028
2,295,000.00
3/6/2023

4.26 2,268,374.41
2,268,374.41 100.75

3.70 30,433.70
2,312,122.86
43,748.45

1.35%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.53 974
91282CGP0
T-Note 4 2/29/2028
1,640,000.00
1/11/2024

4.02 1,638,846.88
1,638,846.88 100.75

3.70 21,747.83
1,652,235.94
13,389.06

0.97%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.53 974
91282CMU2
T-Note 4 3/31/2030
2,010,000.00
4/2/2025

3.89 2,020,050.00
2,020,050.00 100.91

3.79 20,044.93
2,028,294.14
8,244.14

1.2%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.33 1735
91282CHK0
T-Note 4 6/30/2028
115,000.00
7/3/2023

4.17 114,133.01
114,133.01 100.84

3.70 0.00
115,970.31
1,837.30

0.07%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.86 1096
91282CHK0
T-Note 4 6/30/2028
775,000.00
7/10/2023

4.34 763,253.91
763,253.91 100.84

3.70 0.00
781,539.07
18,285.16

0.45%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.86 1096
91282CLC3
T-Note 4 7/31/2029
1,965,000.00
8/2/2024

3.86 1,977,818.55
1,977,818.55 100.92

3.75 32,569.06
1,983,114.84
5,296.29

1.17%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.75 1492
91282CLR0
T-Note 4.125 10/31/2029
1,275,000.00
11/4/2024

4.18 1,271,862.30
1,271,862.30 101.41

3.77 8,717.99
1,293,029.29
21,166.99

0.75%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.99 1584
91282CMA6
T-Note 4.125 11/30/2029
2,735,000.00
12/6/2024

4.09 2,739,914.45
2,739,914.45 101.45

3.77 9,247.44
2,774,636.14
34,721.69

1.63%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.07 1614
91282CKG5
T-Note 4.125 3/31/2029
535,000.00
4/11/2024

4.38 529,085.74
529,085.74 101.34

3.74 5,487.04
542,168.17
13,082.43

0.31%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.48 1370
91282CFM8
T-Note 4.125 9/30/2027
1,500,000.00
5/18/2023

3.57 1,533,515.63
1,533,515.63 100.90

3.70 15,384.22
1,513,476.57
-20,039.06

0.91%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.15 822
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
15 Attachment 1

Page 149 of 520 ends

91282CFM8
T-Note 4.125 9/30/2027
2,045,000.00
10/10/2023

4.76 1,998,588.09
1,998,588.09 100.90

3.70 20,973.82
2,063,373.06
64,784.97

1.19%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.15 822
91282CMG3
T-Note 4.25 1/31/2030
2,600,000.00
2/5/2025

4.33 2,590,351.56
2,590,351.56 101.96

3.78 45,787.29
2,650,882.81
60,531.25

1.54%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.15 1676
91282CMN8
T-Note 4.25 2/15/2028
4,255,000.00
4/11/2025

3.82 4,304,198.44
4,304,198.44 101.34

3.71 65,398.77
4,311,844.16
7,645.72

2.55%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.48 960
91282CKD2
T-Note 4.25 2/28/2029
965,000.00
3/19/2024

4.32 962,135.16
962,135.16 101.75

3.74 13,596.54
981,849.81
19,714.65

0.57%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aa

3.39 1339
91282CKX8
T-Note 4.25 6/30/2029
625,000.00
7/3/2024

4.40 620,751.95
620,751.95 101.84

3.75 0.00
636,499.02
15,747.07

0.37%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.72 1461
91282CKX8
T-Note 4.25 6/30/2029
1,394,000.00
7/3/2024

4.38 1,386,104.30
1,386,104.30 101.84

3.75 0.00
1,419,647.43
33,543.13

0.82%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.72 1461
91282CKX8
T-Note 4.25 6/30/2029
860,000.00
7/9/2024

4.24 860,470.31
860,470.31 101.84

3.75 0.00
875,822.66
15,352.35

0.51%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.72 1461
91282CJN2
T-Note 4.375 11/30/2028
1,785,000.00
12/8/2023

4.23 1,796,435.16
1,796,435.16 102.07

3.72 6,401.13
1,821,955.07
25,519.91

1.07%
None
Moodys-Aaa

3.2 1249
91282CJN2
T-Note 4.375 11/30/2028
990,000.00
12/18/2023

3.94 1,009,219.92
1,009,219.92 102.07

3.72 3,550.20
1,010,496.09
1,276.17

0.6%
None
Moodys-Aaa

3.2 1249
91282CMD0
T-Note 4.375 12/31/2029
2,270,000.00
1/7/2025

4.43 2,264,945.70
2,264,945.70 102.46

3.78 0.00
2,325,863.29
60,917.59

1.34%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.14 1645
91282CHX2
T-Note 4.375 8/31/2028
710,000.00
9/13/2023

4.42 708,474.61
708,474.61 101.96

3.71 10,297.89
723,894.92
15,420.31

0.42%
None
None

2.95 1158
91282CKT7
T-Note 4.5 5/31/2029
665,000.00
6/6/2024

4.31 670,636.91
670,636.91 102.71

3.75 2,452.87
683,053.71
12,416.80

0.4%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.63 1431
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
16 Attachment 1

Page 150 of 520 ends

91282CHM6
T-Note 4.5 7/15/2026
1,645,000.00
1/18/2024

4.09 1,660,807.42
1,660,807.42 100.52

3.98 33,945.17
1,653,578.41
-7,229.01

0.99%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

1.01 380
91282CKP5
T-Note 4.625 4/30/2029
1,035,000.00
5/3/2024

4.57 1,037,708.79
1,037,708.79 103.11

3.74 7,934.77
1,067,222.46
29,513.67

0.62%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.54 1400
91282CJA0
T-Note 4.625 9/30/2028
2,000,000.00
10/10/2023

4.70 1,993,515.63
1,993,515.63 102.76

3.72 22,998.63
2,055,156.24
61,640.61

1.18%
Moodys-Aaa
None

3.03 1188
91282CJF9
T-Note 4.875 10/31/2028
955,000.00
11/2/2023

4.73 960,968.75
960,968.75 103.59

3.72 7,717.20
989,245.71
28,276.96

0.57%
None
Moodys-Aaa

3.1 1219
91282CJF9
T-Note 4.875 10/31/2028
1,370,000.00
1/4/2024

4.00 1,421,910.16
1,421,910.16 103.59

3.72 11,070.75
1,419,127.35
-2,782.81

0.84%
None
Moodys-Aaa

3.1 1219
912810FB9
T-Note 6.125 11/15/2027
1,125,000.00
1/30/2023

3.60 1,248,925.78
1,248,925.78 105.48

3.69 8,613.28
1,186,611.32
-62,314.46

0.74%
None
Moodys-Aaa

2.24 868
985

2.54 54.89%
1,673,537.13
94,136,787.92

3.82 711,525.97
92,463,250.79
Sub Total US Treasury 94,634,000.00 3.74 92,463,250.79
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 171,019,947.65 4.00 168,481,390.41
168,470,373.54

4.01 1,306,646.71
170,638,901.83
2,157,511.42
100.00%

1.87 722
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 6/30/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
17 Attachment 1

Page 151 of 520 ends

Attachment 2
RESOLUTION 25-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

DELGATING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE CITY TREASURER
WHEREAS, Government Code 53607 provides that the authority of the legislative body to invest or to reinvest funds of a local agency, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, may be delegated for a one-year period by the legislative body to the treasurer of the local agency, who shall thereafter assume full responsibility for those transactions until the delegation of authority is revoked or expires, and shall make a monthly report of those transactions to the legislative body; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles desires to delegate investment authority to the City Treasurer of the City of El Paso de Robles for one year, in accordance with the provisions of the Government Code Section 53607.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council hereby delegates the authority to invest or reinvest funds, to sell or exchange securities so purchased to the City Treasurer who shall assume full responsibility for the transactions specified above until this delegation of authority is revoked or expires as provided in Government Code Section 53607. City Treasurer shall make monthly reports of those transactions to the City Council.

Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

APPROVED this 19th day of September 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr.

ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk

Page 152 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: Catherine Piatti, Finance Manager
Ryan Cornell, Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Subject: Receipt of Treasurer’s Report – July 2025
CEQA Determination: The city finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

2. California Government Code Sections 41004 and 53607 require the City to report certain investment and financial activity each month. As a result, this report presents the fund balances, receipts, and disbursements for the City’s operating cash, investment portfolio, and restricted investments for the month of July 2025. Total investment portfolio assets are shown in the attachment and reflect all investments under the care and control of the city.

4. PFM Asset Management LLC provides advisory services to the City for the short-term and long-term portfolios; liquidity funds are managed by the Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer.

5. The investment portfolio complies with all State laws and Council policy and provides sufficient liquidity to meet the City’s needs over the next six months.

Options

1. Take no action.

2. Receive and file the Treasurer’s Report for the month of July 2025.

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Page 153 of 520 ends

assets are shown in the attachment and reflect all investments under the care and control of the city. In an effort to provide greater transparency relating to adherence to the City’s adopted investment policy, the attached report reflects the categories of investment instruments currently held, the maximum percentage of portfolio the policy allows for each instrument, where applicable, and the current percentage of portfolio held in each category.

The City’s total investment funds on hand as of July 31, 2025, are shown below. The City Treasurer has certified that all City investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet the City’s cash flow requirements for the next six months and follow all State and Council laws and policies.

As of 7/31/25
Investments
Beginning
Fund
Balance
Receipts Disbursements
Ending
Fund
Balance
Market
Value
Operating Cash $1,337,526 $20,796,079 $19,814,967 $2,318,638 $2,318,638 Liquidity 23,955,517 193,228 9,930,000 14,218,745 14,218,745 Short / Long Term 144,514,856 3,019,703 2,847,523 144,687,037 146,440,468 Total Investments 169,807,899 24,009,010 32,592,490 161,224,420 162,977,851 As of 7/31/25
Restricted
Investments
Beginning
Fund
Balance
Receipts Disbursements Ending Fund
Balance
Market
Value
Section 115 Trust* 11,082,461 (1,860) 2,480 11,078,121 11,801,315 OPEB Trust 11,435,938 145,723 54,142 11,527,518 11,527,518 Bond Trust 2,558,599 2,544,917 2,015,392 3,088,124 3,088,124 Total Restricted $25,076,998 $2,688,779 $2,072,014 $25,693,763 $26,416,957 *Beginning March 2024, Section 115 balances will be reported based on custodial bank statements. Prior balances were reported based on fiduciary statements.

Recommendation
Receive and file the Monthly Treasurer’s Report for July 2025.

Attachments

1. July 2025 Treasurer’s Report

Page 154 of 520 ends

Fund Name Face Amount/Shares Market Value Book Value % of Portfolio YTM @ Cost Days To Maturity Asset-Backed Securities 20% 595,685.97 586,131.17 588,786.73 0.37 4.31 482 CD | Negotiable 30% 800,000.00 808,574.48 800,000.00 0.50 5.08 351 Corporate Notes 30% 26,370,000.00 26,233,813.04 25,830,967.45 16.25 4.45 1,073 LGIP | Fixed Asset 25,448,852.60 25,448,852.60 25,448,852.60 16.01 4.24 198 LGIP | LAIF 192,494.72 192,494.72 192,494.72 0.12 4.26 1 LGIP | Liquid Asset 14,026,250.61 14,026,250.61 14,026,250.61 8.83 4.41 1 Money Market Funds 20% 226,243.75 226,243.75 226,243.75 0.14 3.96 1 US Treasury 93,989,000.00 93,136,852.44 91,803,623.05 57.77 3.78 976 Total / Average 161,648,527.65 160,659,212.81 158,917,218.91 100.00 4.03 773 This report presents the City’s investment portfolio as of July 31, 2025. Total portfolio assets are shown in the chart below and reflects all investments under the care and control of the City. It does not include funds held by in trust on behalf of the City; i.e. bond reserve funds, deferred compensation plans, Section 115 Trust plan and other post-retirement benefit funds.

The investment portfolio is in compliance with all State laws and provides sufficient liquidity to meet the City's needs over the next six months.

Total Funds on hand at July 31, 2025 included the following and are listed be type:

CITY OF PASO ROBLES

MONTHLY TREASURERS REPORT
JULY 31, 2025
1 Attachment 1

Page 155 of 520 ends

Month Market Value Book Value Unrealized Gain/Loss YTM @ Cost YTM @ Market Duration Days To Maturity 12/31/2024 154,711,720.13 154,775,445.26 -63,725.13 3.83 4.42 1.84 724 1/31/2025 161,879,442.22 161,712,230.95 167,211.27 3.85 4.34 1.81 711 2/28/2025 165,205,899.23 164,142,521.43 1,063,377.80 3.91 4.17 1.79 704 3/31/2025 165,133,465.39 163,824,221.49 1,309,243.90 3.96 4.14 1.79 703 4/30/2025 162,390,030.30 160,260,627.44 2,129,402.86 3.95 3.95 1.93 761 5/31/2025 170,244,687.73 168,770,291.11 1,474,396.62 3.95 4.13 1.79 706 6/30/2025 170,638,901.83 168,481,390.41 2,157,511.42 4.00 4.01 1.87 732 7/31/2025 160,659,212.81 158,917,218.91 1,741,993.90 4.02 4.12 1.97 773 Total / Average 163,857,919.96 162,610,493.38 1,247,426.58 3.93 4.16 1.85 727 Market Value / Book Value Comparison
Begin Date: 12/31/2024, End Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Summary by Month
City of Paso Robles
2 Attachment 1

Page 156 of 520 ends

Main Fund Allocation
Main Fund
Book Value
6/30/2025
% of Portfolio
6/30/2025
Book Value
7/31/2025
% of Portfolio
7/31/2025
Asset-Backed Securities 20% 589,621.58 0.35 588,786.73 0.37 CD | Negotiable 30% 800,000.00 0.47 800,000.00 0.50
Corporate Notes 30% 24,362,124.45 14.46 25,830,967.45 16.25 LGIP | Fixed Asset 25,448,852.60 15.10 25,448,852.60 16.01 LGIP | LAIF 4,515,841.41 2.68 192,494.72 0.12
LGIP | Liquid Asset 19,439,675.73 11.54 14,026,250.61 8.83 Money Market Funds 20% 9,597.40 0.01 226,243.75 0.14
US Agency 852,426.45 0.51 0.00 0.00
US Treasury 92,463,250.79 54.88 91,803,623.05 57.77
Total / Average 168,481,390.41 100.00 158,917,218.91 100.00 Portfolio Holdings as of 6/30/2025 Portfolio Holdings as of 7/31/2025 Begin Date: 6/30/2025, End Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Distribution by Main Fund - Book Value
City of Paso Robles
3 Attachment 1

Page 157 of 520 ends

Main Fund Allocation
Main Fund
Market Value
6/30/2025
% of Portfolio
6/30/2025
Market Value
7/31/2025
% of Portfolio
7/31/2025
Asset-Backed Securities 20% 589,924.20 0.35 586,131.17 0.36 CD | Negotiable 30% 811,116.96 0.48 808,574.48 0.50
Corporate Notes 30% 24,839,895.87 14.56 26,233,813.04 16.33 LGIP | Fixed Asset 25,448,852.60 14.91 25,448,852.60 15.84 LGIP | LAIF 4,515,841.41 2.65 192,494.72 0.12
LGIP | Liquid Asset 19,439,675.73 11.39 14,026,250.61 8.73 Money Market Funds 20% 9,597.40 0.01 226,243.75 0.14
US Agency 847,209.74 0.50 0.00 0.00
US Treasury 94,136,787.92 55.17 93,136,852.44 57.97
Total / Average 170,638,901.83 100.00 160,659,212.81 100.00 Portfolio Holdings as of 6/30/2025 Portfolio Holdings as of 7/31/2025 Begin Date: 6/30/2025, End Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Distribution by Main Fund - Market Value
City of Paso Robles
4 Attachment 1

Page 158 of 520 ends

Buy Transactions
Buy 7/2/2025 91282CNK3 935,000.00 T-Note 3.875 6/30/2030 100.14 936,278.32 196.91 3.84 936,475.23 Buy 7/2/2025 037833DU1 650,000.00 Apple INC 1.65 5/11/2030-30 88.96 578,253.00 1,519.38 4.18 579,772.38 Buy 7/3/2025 882508BJ2 1,000,000.00 Texas Instruments INC 1.75 5/4/2030-30 89.06 890,590.00 2,868.06 4.28 893,458.06 Subtotal 2,585,000.00 2,405,121.32 4,584.35 2,409,705.67 Deposit 7/2/2025 MM9730 20.61 Zions Bank MM 100.00 20.61 0.00 0.00 20.61 Deposit 7/31/2025 LAIF0271 126,653.31 LAIF LGIP 100.00 126,653.31 0.00 0.00 126,653.31 Deposit 7/31/2025 CAMP1001 66,574.88 CAMP LGIP 100.00 66,574.88 0.00 0.00 66,574.88 Deposit 7/31/2025 MM9730 226,243.75 Zions Bank MM 100.00 226,243.75 0.00 0.00 226,243.75 Subtotal 419,492.55 419,492.55 0.00 419,492.55
Total Buy Transactions 3,004,492.55 2,824,613.87 4,584.35 2,829,198.22 Interest/Dividends
Interest 7/1/2025 3137BTUMI 0.00 FHLMC MBS 3.347 11/25/2026 0.00 1,665.08 0.00 1,665.08 Interest 7/2/2025 MM9730 0.00 Zions Bank MM 0.00 20.61 0.00 20.61 Interest 7/6/2025 14913R3B1 0.00 Caterpillar Finl Svcs Corp 4.8 1/6/2026-25 0.00 14,400.00 0.00 14,400.00 Interest 7/14/2025 24422EXB0 0.00 John Deere Capital 4.95 7/14/2028 0.00 15,840.00 0.00 15,840.00 Interest 7/15/2025 91282CHM6 0.00 T-Note 4.5 7/15/2026 0.00 37,012.50 0.00 37,012.50 Interest 7/15/2025 91282CJT9 0.00 T-Note 4 1/15/2027 0.00 33,300.00 0.00 33,300.00 Interest 7/17/2025 713448FX1 0.00 PepsiCo INC 4.5 7/17/2029-29 0.00 12,712.50 0.00 12,712.50 Interest 7/20/2025 21684LGS5 0.00 Cooperatieve Centrale 5.08 7/17/2026 0.00 20,320.00 0.00 20,320.00 Bank of America Corp Var. Corp 7/22/2027 -
26 Interest 7/22/2025 06051GJS9 0.00 0.00 4,291.65 0.00 4,291.65 Interest 7/24/2025 06051GMK2 0.00 Bank of America Corp 4.979 1/24/2029 0.00 11,700.65 0.00 11,700.65 Interest 7/31/2025 91282CMG3 0.00 T-Note 4.25 1/31/2030 0.00 55,250.00 0.00 55,250.00 Interest 7/31/2025 91282CJW2 0.00 T-Note 4 1/31/2029 0.00 50,100.00 0.00 50,100.00 Interest 7/31/2025 LAIF0271 0.00 LAIF LGIP 0.00 126,653.31 0.00 126,653.31 Interest 7/31/2025 91282CBH3 0.00 T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026 0.00 6,168.75 0.00 6,168.75 Interest 7/31/2025 91282CGH8 0.00 T-Note 3.5 1/31/2028 0.00 75,425.00 0.00 75,425.00 Settlement Date CUSIP Description Principal YTM @ Cost
Face Amount /
Action Shares Purchase Price
Interest /
Dividends Total
Begin Date: 6/30/2025, End Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Transaction Summary by Action
City of Paso Robles
5 Attachment 1

Page 159 of 520 ends

Interest 7/31/2025 91282CLC3 0.00 T-Note 4 7/31/2029 0.00 39,300.00 0.00 39,300.00 Interest 7/31/2025 CAMP1001 0.00 CAMP LGIP 0.00 66,574.88 0.00 66,574.88 Subtotal 0.00 0.00 570,734.93 570,734.93
Total Interest/Dividends 0.00 0.00 570,734.93 570,734.93 Sell Transactions
Principal Pay Down 7/25/2025 3137BTUMI 1,294.54 FHLMC MBS 3.347 11/25/2026 0.00 1,294.54 0.00 0.00 1,294.54 Subtotal 1,294.54 1,294.54 0.00 1,294.54
Sell 7/2/2025 91282CGE5 290,000.00 T-Note 3.875 1/15/2026 0.00 289,637.50 5,215.19 0.00 294,852.69 Sell 7/2/2025 9128286A3 375,000.00 T-Note 2.625 1/31/2026 0.00 371,616.21 4,133.29 0.00 375,749.50 Sell 7/2/2025 3137EAEX3 855,000.00 FHLMC 0.375 9/23/2025 0.00 847,305.00 881.72 0.00 848,186.72 Sell 7/3/2025 91282CBH3 280,000.00 T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026 0.00 273,896.88 443.78 0.00 274,340.66 Sell 7/3/2025 91282CBH3 635,000.00 T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026 0.00 621,158.98 1,006.44 0.00 622,165.42 Subtotal 2,435,000.00 2,403,614.57 11,680.42 2,415,294.99 Withdraw 7/7/2025 MM9730 9,618.01 Zions Bank MM 0.00 9,618.01 0.00 0.00 9,618.01 Withdraw 7/31/2025 LAIF0271 4,450,000.00 LAIF LGIP 0.00 4,450,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,450,000.00 Withdraw 7/31/2025 CAMP1001 5,480,000.00 CAMP LGIP 0.00 5,480,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,480,000.00 Subtotal 9,939,618.01 9,939,618.01 0.00 9,939,618.01
Total Sell Transactions 12,375,912.55 12,344,527.12 11,680.42 12,356,207.54 Settlement Date CUSIP Description Principal YTM @ Cost
Face Amount /
Action Shares Purchase Price
Interest /
Dividends Total
Begin Date: 6/30/2025, End Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Transaction Summary by Action
City of Paso Robles
6 Attachment 1

Page 160 of 520 ends

Asset-Backed Securities 20%
3137BTUMI
FHLMC MBS 3.347 11/25/2026
595,685.97
5/24/2023

4.31 588,786.73
577,350.02 98.40

4.49 1,661.47
586,131.17
-2,655.56

0.37%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.18 482
482

1.18 0.37%
-2,655.56
586,131.17

4.49 1,661.47
577,350.02
Sub Total Asset-Backed Securities 20% 595,685.97 4.31 588,786.73 CD | Negotiable 30%
21684LGS5
Cooperatieve Centrale 5.08 7/17/2026
800,000.00
7/20/2023

5.08 800,000.00
800,000.00 101.07

3.94 1,241.78
808,574.48
8,574.48

0.5%
FDIC Insured
FDIC Insured

0.95 351
351

0.95 0.5%
8,574.48
808,574.48

3.94 1,241.78
800,000.00
Sub Total CD | Negotiable 30% 800,000.00 5.08 800,000.00 Corporate Notes 30%
00724PAF6
Adobe Inc 4.8 4/4/2029-29
465,000.00
4/4/2024

4.83 464,307.15
464,307.15 102.09

4.18 7,254.00
474,708.55
10,401.40

0.29%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.37 1312
00724PAF6
Adobe Inc 4.8 4/4/2029-29
380,000.00
4/5/2024

4.77 380,501.60
380,501.60 102.09

4.18 5,928.00
387,933.86
7,432.26

0.24%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.37 1312
02079KAC1
Alphabet Inc 1.998 8/15/2026-26
980,000.00
1/30/2023

4.05 914,163.60
914,163.60 97.77

4.22 9,028.74
958,133.44
43,969.84

0.58%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aa2

1.02 288
023135BC9
Amazon.Com INC 3.15 8/22/2027
370,000.00
11/3/2022

4.81 343,863.20
343,863.20 98.11

4.12 5,147.62
362,994.39
19,131.19

0.22%
S&P-AA
Moodys-A1

1.98 752
037833DU1
Apple INC 1.65 5/11/2030-30
650,000.00
7/2/2025

4.18 578,253.00
578,253.00 88.86

4.25 2,383.33
577,603.23
-649.77

0.36%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.58 1715
037833ET3
Apple Inc 4 5/10/2028-28
1,230,000.00
5/18/2023

3.94 1,233,198.00
1,233,198.00 99.92

4.03 11,070.00
1,228,982.61
-4,215.39

0.78%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.63 984
06051GMK2
Bank of America Corp 4.979 1/24/2029
470,000.00
4/2/2025

4.66 475,207.60
475,207.60 101.22

4.60 455.03
475,746.55
538.95

0.3%
S&P-AMoodys-A1

3.24 1273
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
7 Attachment 1

Page 161 of 520 ends

06051GJS9
Bank of America Corp Var. Corp 7/22/2027 -
26 495,000.00
8/4/2022

1.73 446,381.10
446,381.10 97.25

1.73 214.58
481,364.97
34,983.87

0.28%
S&P-AMoodys-A2
0 356
06406RAB3
Bank of NY Mellon Corp 3.442 2/7/2028-27
1,750,000.00
8/7/2024

4.33 1,700,195.00
1,700,195.00 98.70

3.99 29,113.58
1,727,217.29
27,022.29

1.07%
S&P-A
Moodys-A1

2.39 556
09290DAA9
Blackrock Funding INC 4.7 3/14/2029-29
105,000.00
3/14/2024

4.74 104,809.95
104,809.95 101.64

4.21 1,878.04
106,721.61
1,911.66

0.07%
S&P-AAMoodys-Aa3

3.32 1294
14913R3B1
Caterpillar Finl Svcs Corp 4.8 1/6/2026-25
600,000.00
1/27/2023

4.32 607,812.00
607,812.00 100.10

4.55 2,000.00
600,600.08
-7,211.92

0.38%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

0.43 128
17275RBX9
Cisco Systems INC 4.75 2/24/2030-30
1,750,000.00
4/22/2025

4.45 1,772,610.00
1,772,610.00 101.67

4.34 36,251.74
1,779,308.13
6,698.13

1.12%
S&P-AAMoodys-A1

4.08 1638
17325FBB3
Citibank 5.803 9/29/2028-28
1,345,000.00
9/29/2023

5.80 1,345,000.00
1,345,000.00 104.14

4.38 26,450.40
1,400,749.38
55,749.38

0.85%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3

2.89 1125
532457CQ9
Eli Lilly & Co 4.2 8/14/2029-29
195,000.00
8/14/2024

4.25 194,572.95
194,572.95 99.96

4.21 3,799.25
194,914.01
341.06

0.12%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.68 1444
532457CQ9
Eli Lilly & Co 4.2 8/14/2029-29
680,000.00
8/14/2024

4.17 680,992.80
680,992.80 99.96

4.21 13,248.67
679,700.14
-1,292.66

0.43%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.68 1444
38151LAG5
Goldman Sachs Bank 5.414 5/21/2027
880,000.00
5/22/2025

5.08 885,535.20
885,535.20 100.58

5.07 9,263.96
885,106.60
-428.60

0.56%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

1.73 659
427866BH0
Hershey Company 4.25 5/4/2028-28
615,000.00
5/18/2023

4.07 619,969.20
619,969.20 100.33

4.12 6,316.56
617,042.85
-2,926.35

0.39%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.61 978
437076BT8
Home Depot Inc 2.8 9/14/2027-27
650,000.00
1/30/2023

4.16 613,210.00
613,210.00 97.16

4.21 6,926.11
631,558.48
18,348.48

0.39%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.05 683
24422EXB0
John Deere Capital 4.95 7/14/2028
125,000.00
7/14/2023

4.64 126,700.00
126,700.00 102.23

4.14 292.19
127,783.98
1,083.98

0.08%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.78 1079
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
8 Attachment 1

Page 162 of 520 ends

24422EXB0
John Deere Capital 4.95 7/14/2028
290,000.00
7/14/2023

4.98 289,567.90
289,567.90 102.23

4.14 677.88
296,458.84
6,890.94

0.18%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.78 1079
24422EXB0
John Deere Capital 4.95 7/14/2028
225,000.00
7/18/2023

4.73 227,205.00
227,205.00 102.23

4.14 525.94
230,011.17
2,806.17

0.14%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.78 1079
478160CN2
Johnson & Johnson 0.55 9/1/2025-25
440,000.00
9/24/2020

0.49 441,262.80
441,262.80 99.66

4.69 1,008.33
438,482.71
-2,780.09

0.28%

S&P-AAA
Moodys-Aaa

0.08 1
48125LRU8
JP Morgan Bank NA 5.11 12/8/2026-26
1,000,000.00
12/8/2023

5.11 1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00 100.93

4.39 7,523.06
1,009,299.56
9,299.56

0.63%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa2

1.32 465
46647PCW4
JP Morgan Chase & CO 2.947 2/24/2028-27
350,000.00
9/18/2023

5.13 320,029.50
320,029.50 97.65

3.92 4,498.27
341,759.67
21,730.17

0.2%
S&P-AMoodys-A1

2.46 573
46647PEG7
JPMorgan Chase & Co 5.581 4/22/2030
425,000.00
4/28/2025

4.87 438,221.75
438,221.75 103.66

4.71 6,522.79
440,552.45
2,330.70

0.28%
S&P-A
Moodys-A1

4.17 1726
49177JAF9
Kenvue INC 5.05 3/22/2028-28
635,000.00
6/30/2025

4.12 649,992.35
649,992.35 102.02

4.23 11,490.85
647,827.18
-2,165.17

0.41%
S&P-A
Moodys-A1

2.47 936
57636QAM6
Mastercard Inc 2.95 6/1/2029-29
460,000.00
6/27/2024

4.82 422,620.40
422,620.40 95.69

4.18 2,261.67
440,181.08
17,560.68

0.27%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3

3.63 1370
57636QBF0
Mastercard Incorporated 4.55 3/15/2028-28
440,000.00
3/3/2025

4.26 443,586.00
443,586.00 100.99

4.15 8,564.11
444,361.37
775.37

0.28%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3

2.46 929
58933YAX3
Merck & Co INC 3.4 3/7/2029-29
645,000.00
6/30/2025

4.16 628,313.85
628,313.85 97.14

4.27 8,772.00
626,523.71
-1,790.14

0.4%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3

3.37 1287
61690U8B9
Morgan Stanley Bank Var. Corp 5/26/2028 -
27 375,000.00
5/30/2024

5.50 375,000.00
375,000.00 101.78

5.50 3,726.67
381,676.89
6,676.89

0.24%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3
0 664
61690U8B9
Morgan Stanley Bank Var. Corp 5/26/2028 -
27 725,000.00
5/31/2024

5.50 726,529.75
726,529.75 101.78

5.50 7,204.89
737,908.64
11,378.89

0.46%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3
0 664
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
9 Attachment 1

Page 163 of 520 ends

69371RS56
Paccar Finanical 5.05 8/10/2026
650,000.00
8/11/2023

4.88 652,990.00
652,990.00 100.71

4.33 15,591.88
654,622.51
1,632.51

0.41%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

0.99 375
713448FX1
PepsiCo INC 4.5 7/17/2029-29
565,000.00
7/17/2024

4.54 564,124.25
564,124.25 101.08

4.20 988.75
571,074.96
6,950.71

0.35%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.67 1417
713448GB8
PEPSICO INC 4.6 2/7/2030-30
220,000.00
2/7/2025

4.64 219,630.40
219,630.40 101.41

4.25 4,891.33
223,110.02
3,479.62

0.14%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

4.04 1621
713448GB8
PEPSICO INC 4.6 2/7/2030-30
565,000.00
4/30/2025

4.23 573,859.20
573,859.20 101.41

4.25 12,561.83
572,987.11
-872.09

0.36%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

4.04 1621
69353RFG8
PNC Bank NA 3.1 10/25/2027
735,000.00
12/8/2022

4.39 693,884.10
693,884.10 97.27

4.39 6,076.00
714,962.30
21,078.20

0.44%
S&P-A
Moodys-A2

2.16 816
857477CN1
State Street Corp 4.53 2/20/2029-29
235,000.00
8/20/2024

4.53 235,000.00
235,000.00 100.41

4.40 4,760.90
235,963.85
963.85

0.15%
S&P-A
Moodys-A1

3.26 1269
882508BJ2
Texas Instruments INC 1.75 5/4/2030-30
1,000,000.00
7/3/2025

4.28 890,590.00
890,590.00 89.00

4.33 4,229.17
889,958.76
-631.24

0.56%
S&P-A+
Moodys-Aa3

4.55 1708
89236TMK8
Toyota Motor Credit Corp 4.55 8/9/2029
160,000.00
8/9/2024

4.58 159,816.00
159,816.00 100.61

4.38 3,498.44
160,982.27
1,166.27

0.1%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.64 1470
89236TMK8
Toyota Motor Credit Corp 4.55 8/9/2029
190,000.00
8/9/2024

4.64 189,219.10
189,219.10 100.61

4.38 4,154.40
191,166.44
1,947.34

0.12%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.64 1470
89236TMK8
Toyota Motor Credit Corp 4.55 8/9/2029
75,000.00
8/9/2024

4.60 74,847.75
74,847.75 100.61

4.38 1,639.90
75,460.44
612.69

0.05%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

3.64 1470
89236TLB9
Toyota Motor Credit Corp 5.25 9/11/2028
400,000.00
9/11/2023

5.29 399,304.00
399,304.00 102.84

4.26 8,166.67
411,363.23
12,059.23

0.25%
S&P-A+
Moodys-A1

2.86 1138
931142ER0
Walmart Inc 1.05 9/17/2026-26
1,030,000.00
1/30/2023

4.14 923,601.00
923,601.00 96.64

4.13 4,025.58
995,399.07
71,798.07

0.58%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aa2

1.12 382
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
10 Attachment 1

Page 164 of 520 ends

931142FN8
WalMart INC 4.35 4/28/2030-30
250,000.00
4/28/2025

4.39 249,567.50
249,567.50 100.44

4.24 2,809.38
251,108.96
1,541.46

0.16%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aa2

4.29 1701
931142FN8
WalMart INC 4.35 4/28/2030-30
550,000.00
5/2/2025

4.15 554,922.50
554,922.50 100.44

4.24 6,180.62
552,439.70
-2,482.80

0.35%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aa2

4.29 1701
999

2.59 16.3%
402,845.59
26,233,813.04

4.29 319,373.11
25,830,967.45
Sub Total Corporate Notes 30% 26,370,000.00 4.45 25,830,967.45 LGIP | Fixed Asset
CAMP10-31-25
CAMP TERM 4.21 10/31/2025
12,000,000.00
1/3/2025

4.21 12,000,000.00
12,000,000.00 100.00

4.21 289,278.90
12,000,000.00

0.00 7.55%
NR
NR

0.25 92
CAMP05-19-26
CAMP TERM 4.27 5/19/2026
13,448,852.60
6/2/2025

4.27 13,448,852.60
13,448,852.60 100.00

4.27 92,826.56
13,448,852.60

0.00 8.46%
NR
NR

0.8 292
198

0.54 16.01%

0.00 25,448,852.60

4.24 382,105.46
25,448,852.60
Sub Total LGIP | Fixed Asset 25,448,852.60 4.24 25,448,852.60 LGIP | LAIF
LAIF0271

LAIF LGIP
192,494.72
12/31/2019

4.26 192,494.72
192,494.72 100.00

4.26 192,494.72

0.00 0.12%
NR
NR
0 1
1 0

0.12%

0.00 192,494.72

4.26 192,494.72
Sub Total LGIP | LAIF 192,494.72 4.26 192,494.72
LGIP | Liquid Asset
CAMP1001

CAMP LGIP
14,026,250.61
12/31/2019

4.41 14,026,250.61
14,026,250.61 100.00

4.41 14,026,250.61

0.00 8.83%
NR
NR
0 1
1 0

8.83%

0.00 14,026,250.61

4.41 14,026,250.61
Sub Total LGIP | Liquid Asset 14,026,250.61 4.41 14,026,250.61 Money Market Funds 20%
MM9730
Zions Bank MM
226,243.75
2/1/2020

3.96 226,243.75
226,243.75 100.00

3.96 226,243.75

0.00 0.14%
NR
NR
0 1
1 0

0.14%

0.00 226,243.75

3.96 226,243.75
Sub Total Money Market Funds 20% 226,243.75 3.96 226,243.75 CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
11 Attachment 1

Page 165 of 520 ends

US Treasury
91282CBH3
T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026
1,420,000.00
1/6/2022

1.27 1,369,634.38
1,369,634.38 98.05

4.36 0.00
1,392,343.29
22,708.91

0.86%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.5 184
91282CBH3
T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026
765,000.00
2/22/2022

1.82 723,193.95
723,193.95 98.05

4.36 0.00
750,100.43
26,906.48

0.46%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.5 184
91282CBH3
T-Note 0.375 1/31/2026
1,105,000.00
5/4/2022

2.95 1,004,859.38
1,004,859.38 98.05

4.36 0.00
1,083,478.40
78,619.02

0.63%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.5 184
91282CAU5
T-Note 0.5 10/31/2027
2,170,000.00
1/6/2023

3.91 1,847,975.39
1,847,975.39 92.70

3.92 2,712.50
2,011,657.81
163,682.42

1.16%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.24 822
91282CBQ3
T-Note 0.5 2/28/2026
1,680,000.00
3/5/2021

0.71 1,662,609.38
1,662,609.38 97.81

4.33 3,492.39
1,643,250.00
-19,359.38

1.05%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.58 212
91282CBQ3
T-Note 0.5 2/28/2026
1,635,000.00
12/7/2021

1.16 1,590,867.77
1,590,867.77 97.81

4.33 3,398.85
1,599,234.38
8,366.61
1%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.58 212
912828ZN3
T-Note 0.5 4/30/2027
610,000.00
8/4/2022

2.89 545,973.83
545,973.83 94.18

3.98 762.50
574,472.26
28,498.43

0.34%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.74 638
912828ZV5
T-Note 0.5 6/30/2027
840,000.00
8/10/2022

2.99 745,434.38
745,434.38 93.69

3.95 353.80
787,007.81
41,573.43

0.47%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.91 699
91282CBB6
T-Note 0.625 12/31/2027
1,900,000.00
1/25/2024

4.09 1,663,242.19
1,663,242.19 92.49

3.91 1,000.34
1,757,277.34
94,035.15

1.05%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

2.4 883
91282CCF6
T-Note 0.75 5/31/2026
1,210,000.00
6/4/2021

0.82 1,206,171.48
1,206,171.48 97.17

4.24 1,512.50
1,175,741.87
-30,429.61

0.76%
Moodys-Aaa
S&P-AA+

0.83 304
91282CCF6
T-Note 0.75 5/31/2026
905,000.00
6/8/2022

2.99 829,418.36
829,418.36 97.17

4.24 1,131.25
879,377.19
49,958.83

0.52%
Moodys-Aaa
S&P-AA+

0.83 304
91282CCZ2
T-Note 0.875 9/30/2026
1,075,000.00
4/7/2022

2.77 989,797.85
989,797.85 96.31

4.14 3,135.42
1,035,359.38
45,561.53

0.62%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.16 426
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
12 Attachment 1

Page 166 of 520 ends

91282CCV1
T-Note 1.125 8/31/2028
1,160,000.00
11/3/2023

4.69 983,507.81
983,507.81 92.02

3.90 5,425.68
1,067,381.25
83,873.44

0.62%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.02 1127
91282CDQ1
T-Note 1.25 12/31/2026
1,385,000.00
1/30/2023

3.71 1,262,027.15
1,262,027.15 96.15

4.08 1,458.39
1,331,655.87
69,628.72

0.79%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.41 518
91282CDQ1
T-Note 1.25 12/31/2026
2,760,000.00
2/10/2023

3.95 2,494,026.56
2,494,026.56 96.15

4.08 2,906.25
2,653,696.89
159,670.33

1.57%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.41 518
91282CBZ3
T-Note 1.25 4/30/2028
1,865,000.00
1/25/2024

4.08 1,660,287.11
1,660,287.11 93.16

3.90 5,828.12
1,737,436.91
77,149.80

1.04%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

2.7 1004
9128287B0
T-Note 1.875 6/30/2026
1,620,000.00
5/18/2023

3.69 1,533,937.50
1,533,937.50 97.92

4.21 2,558.76
1,586,309.05
52,371.55

0.97%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.91 334
912828V98
T-Note 2.25 2/15/2027
1,155,000.00
7/7/2022

2.85 1,125,132.42
1,125,132.42 97.36

4.04 11,916.92
1,124,455.67
-676.75

0.71%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.51 564
9128282R0
T-Note 2.25 8/15/2027
2,180,000.00
9/6/2022

3.40 2,066,827.34
2,066,827.34 96.70

3.95 22,492.54
2,107,957.80
41,130.46

1.3%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.99 745
91282CEN7
T-Note 2.75 4/30/2027
1,285,000.00
5/5/2023

3.50 1,249,260.94
1,249,260.94 97.91

3.99 8,834.38
1,258,195.70
8,934.76

0.79%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

1.71 638
9128284N7
T-Note 2.875 5/15/2028
1,735,000.00
1/11/2024

4.01 1,657,060.55
1,657,060.55 97.31

3.90 10,437.11
1,688,304.11
31,243.56

1.04%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

2.68 1019
91282CGH8
T-Note 3.5 1/31/2028
1,755,000.00
6/5/2023

3.76 1,735,461.91
1,735,461.91 99.03

3.91 0.00
1,737,998.44
2,536.53

1.09%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.41 914
91282CGH8
T-Note 3.5 1/31/2028
2,555,000.00
2/8/2024

4.16 2,493,520.31
2,493,520.31 99.03

3.91 0.00
2,530,248.44
36,728.13

1.57%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.41 914
91282CHA2
T-Note 3.5 4/30/2028
485,000.00
5/1/2023

3.60 482,821.29
482,821.29 98.95

3.90 4,243.75
479,922.66
-2,898.63

0.3%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.62 1004
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
13 Attachment 1

Page 167 of 520 ends

91282CLN9
T-Note 3.5 9/30/2029
470,000.00
10/3/2024

3.56 468,733.20
468,733.20 98.34

3.93 5,483.33
462,215.63
-6,517.57

0.29%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.87 1522
91282CGT2
T-Note 3.625 3/31/2028
1,230,000.00
5/5/2023

3.41 1,241,963.67
1,241,963.67 99.32

3.90 14,862.50
1,221,591.79
-20,371.88

0.78%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.54 974
91282CLK5
T-Note 3.625 8/31/2029
1,345,000.00
9/5/2024

3.58 1,347,784.57
1,347,784.57 98.86

3.93 20,270.94
1,329,606.06
-18,178.51

0.85%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.77 1492
91282CJR3
T-Note 3.75 12/31/2028
1,680,000.00
1/11/2024

3.97 1,663,725.00
1,663,725.00 99.48

3.91 5,307.07
1,671,337.50
7,612.50

1.05%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

3.23 1249
91282CGV7
T-Note 3.75 4/15/2026
1,240,000.00
5/5/2023

3.63 1,244,262.50
1,244,262.50 99.68

4.21 13,594.26
1,236,018.43
-8,244.07

0.78%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

0.7 258
91282CHF1
T-Note 3.75 5/31/2030
1,955,000.00
6/5/2025

4.00 1,933,158.98
1,933,158.98 99.07

3.96 12,218.75
1,936,748.24
3,589.26

1.22%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aa1

4.44 1765
91282CMZ1
T-Note 3.875 4/30/2030
625,000.00
5/1/2025

3.69 630,297.85
630,297.85 99.67

3.95 6,104.45
622,924.81
-7,373.04

0.4%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.34 1734
91282CNK3
T-Note 3.875 6/30/2030
935,000.00
7/2/2025

3.85 936,278.32
936,278.32 99.62

3.96 3,052.09
931,420.71
-4,857.61

0.59%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aa1

4.51 1795
91282CJT9
T-Note 4 1/15/2027
1,665,000.00
1/18/2024

4.01 1,664,414.65
1,664,414.65 99.91

4.06 2,895.65
1,663,504.10
-910.55

1.05%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

1.43 533
91282CJW2
T-Note 4 1/31/2029
2,505,000.00
2/8/2024

4.10 2,493,649.22
2,493,649.22 100.27

3.92 0.00
2,511,849.62
18,200.40

1.57%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aa

3.3 1280
91282CGL9
T-Note 4 2/15/2026
2,535,000.00
3/6/2023

4.61 2,493,014.06
2,493,014.06 99.84

4.31 46,498.34
2,530,850.91
37,836.85

1.57%
None
Moodys-Aaa

0.53 199
91282CGQ8
T-Note 4 2/28/2030
410,000.00
3/5/2025

3.98 410,288.28
410,288.28 100.25

3.94 6,818.48
411,008.99
720.71

0.26%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.17 1673
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
14 Attachment 1

Page 168 of 520 ends

91282CGP0
T-Note 4 2/29/2028
2,295,000.00
3/6/2023

4.26 2,268,374.41
2,268,374.41 100.23

3.90 38,166.85
2,300,289.27
31,914.86

1.43%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.44 943
91282CGP0
T-Note 4 2/29/2028
1,640,000.00
1/11/2024

4.02 1,638,846.88
1,638,846.88 100.23

3.90 27,273.91
1,643,779.69
4,932.81

1.03%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.44 943
91282CMU2
T-Note 4 3/31/2030
2,010,000.00
4/2/2025

3.89 2,020,050.00
2,020,050.00 100.20

3.95 26,873.42
2,014,082.81
-5,967.19

1.27%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.25 1704
91282CHK0
T-Note 4 6/30/2028
115,000.00
7/3/2023

4.17 114,133.01
114,133.01 100.30

3.89 387.50
115,341.41
1,208.40

0.07%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.77 1065
91282CHK0
T-Note 4 6/30/2028
775,000.00
7/10/2023

4.34 763,253.91
763,253.91 100.30

3.89 2,611.41
777,300.78
14,046.87

0.48%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.77 1065
91282CLC3
T-Note 4 7/31/2029
1,965,000.00
8/2/2024

3.86 1,977,818.55
1,977,818.55 100.26

3.93 0.00
1,970,142.78
-7,675.77

1.24%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.74 1461
91282CLR0
T-Note 4.125 10/31/2029
1,275,000.00
11/4/2024

4.18 1,271,862.30
1,271,862.30 100.72

3.94 13,148.44
1,284,164.06
12,301.76

0.8%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.9 1553
91282CMA6
T-Note 4.125 11/30/2029
2,735,000.00
12/6/2024

4.09 2,739,914.45
2,739,914.45 100.73

3.94 18,803.12
2,755,085.16
15,170.71

1.72%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.99 1583
91282CKG5
T-Note 4.125 3/31/2029
535,000.00
4/11/2024

4.38 529,085.74
529,085.74 100.70

3.92 7,356.25
538,740.82
9,655.08

0.33%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.4 1339
91282CFM8
T-Note 4.125 9/30/2027
1,500,000.00
5/18/2023

3.57 1,533,515.63
1,533,515.63 100.41

3.93 20,625.00
1,506,093.75
-27,421.88

0.96%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.07 791
91282CFM8
T-Note 4.125 9/30/2027
2,045,000.00
10/10/2023

4.76 1,998,588.09
1,998,588.09 100.41

3.93 28,118.75
2,053,307.81
54,719.72

1.26%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.07 791
91282CMG3
T-Note 4.25 1/31/2030
2,600,000.00
2/5/2025

4.33 2,590,351.56
2,590,351.56 101.23

3.95 0.00
2,631,992.19
41,640.63

1.63%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.15 1645
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
15 Attachment 1

Page 169 of 520 ends

91282CMN8
T-Note 4.25 2/15/2028
4,255,000.00
4/11/2025

3.82 4,304,198.44
4,304,198.44 100.81

3.91 80,757.57
4,289,405.67
-14,792.77

2.71%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

2.39 929
91282CKD2
T-Note 4.25 2/28/2029
965,000.00
3/19/2024

4.32 962,135.16
962,135.16 101.12

3.91 17,051.39
975,780.86
13,645.70

0.61%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aa

3.31 1308
91282CKX8
T-Note 4.25 6/30/2029
625,000.00
7/3/2024

4.40 620,751.95
620,751.95 101.16

3.93 2,237.60
632,250.98
11,499.03

0.39%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.64 1430
91282CKX8
T-Note 4.25 6/30/2029
1,394,000.00
7/3/2024

4.38 1,386,104.30
1,386,104.30 101.16

3.93 4,990.75
1,410,172.57
24,068.27

0.87%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.64 1430
91282CKX8
T-Note 4.25 6/30/2029
860,000.00
7/9/2024

4.24 860,470.31
860,470.31 101.16

3.93 3,078.94
869,977.34
9,507.03

0.54%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.64 1430
91282CJN2
T-Note 4.375 11/30/2028
1,785,000.00
12/8/2023

4.23 1,796,435.16
1,796,435.16 101.44

3.91 13,015.63
1,810,659.38
14,224.22

1.13%
None
Moodys-Aaa

3.12 1218
91282CJN2
T-Note 4.375 11/30/2028
990,000.00
12/18/2023

3.94 1,009,219.92
1,009,219.92 101.44

3.91 7,218.75
1,004,231.25
-4,988.67

0.64%
None
Moodys-Aaa

3.12 1218
91282CMD0
T-Note 4.375 12/31/2029
2,270,000.00
1/7/2025

4.43 2,264,945.70
2,264,945.70 101.72

3.95 8,366.00
2,309,104.29
44,158.59

1.43%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

4.05 1614
91282CHX2
T-Note 4.375 8/31/2028
710,000.00
9/13/2023

4.42 708,474.61
708,474.61 101.36

3.90 12,914.57
719,623.83
11,149.22

0.45%
None
None

2.87 1127
91282CKT7
T-Note 4.5 5/31/2029
665,000.00
6/6/2024

4.31 670,636.91
670,636.91 102.03

3.92 4,987.50
678,481.84
7,844.93

0.42%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.54 1400
91282CHM6
T-Note 4.5 7/15/2026
1,645,000.00
1/18/2024

4.09 1,660,807.42
1,660,807.42 100.28

4.19 3,218.48
1,649,665.12
-11,142.30

1.05%
S&P-AA
Moodys-Aaa

0.95 349
91282CKP5
T-Note 4.625 4/30/2029
1,035,000.00
5/3/2024

4.57 1,037,708.79
1,037,708.79 102.43

3.92 11,967.19
1,060,147.27
22,438.48

0.65%
S&P-AA+
Moodys-Aaa

3.45 1369
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
16 Attachment 1

Page 170 of 520 ends

91282CJA0
T-Note 4.625 9/30/2028
2,000,000.00
10/10/2023

4.70 1,993,515.63
1,993,515.63 102.13

3.90 30,833.33
2,042,578.12
49,062.49

1.25%
Moodys-Aaa
None

2.94 1157
91282CJF9
T-Note 4.875 10/31/2028
955,000.00
11/2/2023

4.73 960,968.75
960,968.75 102.92

3.91 11,639.06
982,903.90
21,935.15

0.6%
None
Moodys-Aaa

3.01 1188
91282CJF9
T-Note 4.875 10/31/2028
1,370,000.00
1/4/2024

4.00 1,421,910.16
1,421,910.16 102.92

3.91 16,696.88
1,410,029.68
-11,880.48

0.89%
None
Moodys-Aaa

3.01 1188
912810FB9
T-Note 6.125 11/15/2027
1,125,000.00
1/30/2023

3.60 1,248,925.78
1,248,925.78 104.85

3.89 14,417.88
1,179,580.07
-69,345.71

0.79%
None
Moodys-Aaa

2.15 837
976

2.52 57.76%
1,333,229.39
93,136,852.44

4.00 657,463.48
91,803,623.05
Sub Total US Treasury 93,989,000.00 3.78 91,803,623.05
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 161,648,527.65 4.03 158,917,218.91
158,905,782.20

4.12 1,361,845.30
160,659,212.81
1,741,993.90
100.00%

1.97 761
CUSIP
Face Amount /
Shares
Description Settlement Date
YTM @ Cost
Cost Value
Book Value YTM @ Market
Market Price Market Value
Accrued Interest Unre. Gain/Loss
% Portfolio
Credit Rating
Credit Rating
Duration To Maturity
Days To Call/Maturity
Date: 7/31/2025 Report Group | Investment Policy Compliance Portfolio Holdings by Main Fund
City of Paso Robles
17 Attachment 1

Page 171 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: Jonathan Stornetta, Fire Chief
Subject: Approval of a Resolution Authorizing the Participation in San Luis Obispo County Ambulance Services Request for Proposal and Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with AP Triton for Related Services CEQA Determination: The City find that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

1. Seven cities in San Luis Obispo County are collaborating to create a unified, coordinated, and accountable emergency medical services (EMS) system to improve service levels, efficiency, transparency, and long-term sustainability.

2. The proposed “Alliance Model” is a public-private partnership that designates the City of Paso Robles as the provider of record.

3. The Alliance Model allows public agencies to subcontract with a private ambulance provider under one coordinated system, combining public oversight with private operational expertise.

4. The Alliance Model provides access to federal funding streams that are only available to public entities. These funds can be reinvested directly into EMS system improvements. Benefits of the Alliance Model include improved transparency, and reinvestment of revenues into system enhancements, preventative health programs, and services for vulnerable populations, including those experiencing mental health crises and homelessness.

5. The Alliance Model fosters collaboration among fire departments, EMS providers, hospitals, and local government agencies.

6. The County of San Luis Obispo will soon release a competitive request for proposal (RFP) for ambulance transport services, aiming to maximize innovation and value in the EMS system.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Approve participation in the County RFP process and authorize the city manager to execute an agreement with AP Triton for consultant services;

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
In response to the growing need for a more coordinated and accountable emergency medical services system, the seven cities within San Luis Obispo County have come together to pursue a unified approach to ambulance service delivery. This collaborative effort seeks to enhance efficiency, transparency, and long-term sustainability in the provision of emergency medical care.

Page 172 of 520 ends

For the past five and a half years the seven incorporated cities’ city managers and the San Luis Obispo County Fire Chiefs Association have evaluated the benefits and risks of bidding the county RFP through a public-private partnership.

The Alliance model would designate the City of Paso Robles as the provider of record, granting the cities full control and management of the ambulance system through an executive committee composed of the seven cities’ city managers. The Alliance Model also generates additional revenue exclusive to public providers.

The Alliance Model provides access to federal and state reimbursements that are available exclusively to public entities. These funds flow back into the EMS system, helping offset costs while supporting system enhancements, innovations, equipment upgrades, training, and public health initiatives. Traditional, fully private EMS systems cannot access these funds for reinvestment back into the system.

Benefits of an Alliance include:
 Innovative EMS delivery model with oversight provided by the seven city managers ensuring transparency and accountability.
 Enhance service delivery with greater local involvement and oversight.  Foster regional cooperation by uniting the cities, community service districts, county, and fire agencies in a shared vision for EMS improvement.
 Support proactive and preventative programs addressing mental health, substance abuse, and services for unhoused community members.
 Reinvest revenues after operational costs back into the EMS system to improve public health outcomes.

Through collaborative governance, innovative delivery models, and strategic reinvestment in the EMS system, the Alliance model will build a resilient, accountable, and patient-centered approach that meets the evolving healthcare needs of our communities today and into the future.

The County of San Luis Obispo plans to release a Request for Proposal (RFP) for ambulance transport services in the coming months. This competitive bidding process is intended to maximize innovation and enhance value within the existing EMS system.

Staff is seeking City Council approval to proceed with preparing and submitting (as the lead agency) a proposal in response to San Luis Obispo County’s forthcoming RFP for ambulance transport services. Not participating in the RFP process would mean forgoing the opportunity to improve EMS system accountability, patient outcomes, and access to federal and state revenue.

Given the complexity of ambulance service procurement and the highly technical nature of EMS system design, staff recommends securing expert assistance from AP Triton to ensure a competitive and compliant proposal. Proceeding without consultant assistance is not recommended given the complexity of the RFP process, financial modeling, and system integration requirements. AP Triton, based on past work for the City associated with this larger matter, is privy to sensitive City information that includes system evaluations and financial projections. Accordingly, going out to competitive bid would prejudice the City and the sensitivity of that information. The City recommends the City Council approve sole source findings under Section 5.0 of City’s Purchasing and Payment Procedures Manual, in awarding the consulting services to AP Triton as contemplated by this item.

Page 173 of 520 ends

If the City is successful in the County RFP process, the City Council will consider additional agreements and memorandums of understanding prior to initiating a new EMS system. This proposed action is the first of several steps in the process for the City Council.

Fiscal Impact
The total cost for AP Triton’s consulting services is $255,749, to be shared amongst the seven participating cities. Paso Robles’ share is estimated at $50,753. To date, all seven cities have participated in a cost‐ sharing arrangement to fund activities related to the regional emergency ambulance services process.

These shared expenses have included the ambulance system assessment, emergency medical services system valuation, and the future development and submission of a coordinated response to the County’s RFP for emergency ambulance services.

City staff, as well as the other participating agencies, will bring back the full pro-forma of the proposed EMS system and servicesto their respective City Councilsif the City is successful in the County RFP process.

Any City funds expended to implement a new EMS system will be reimbursed to the City once the program is in place
CEQA
The City find that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378 because the contemplated actions will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

Recommendation
Approve Resolution 25-XXX, authorizing the City of Paso Robles to submit a bid in the upcoming San Luis Obispo County RFP for ambulance services and authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with AP Triton.

Attachments

1. Resolution 25-XXX – SLO County Ambulance Service RFP Click or tap here to enter text.

Page 174 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES AUTHORIZING

PARTICIPATION IN THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH AP TRITON FOR

ASSOCIATED CONSULTING SERVICES
WHEREAS, the seven incorporated cities of San Luis Obispo County are collaborating to develop a unified, coordinated, and accountable emergency medical services (EMS) system to enhance efficiency, transparency, and long-term sustainability; and WHEREAS, the proposed “Alliance Model” is a public-private partnership designating the City of Paso Robles as the provider of record, with oversight provided by an executive committee composed of the seven city managers; and
WHEREAS, the Alliance Model provides access to federal funding streams that are only available to public entities. These funds can be reinvested directly into EMS system improvements; and WHEREAS, the benefits of the Alliance Model include improved transparency, reinvestment of revenues into system enhancements, preventative health programs, and services for vulnerable populations, including those experiencing mental health crises and homelessness; and WHEREAS, the County of San Luis Obispo will be releasing a competitive RFP for ambulance transport services, and participation by the City of Paso Robles will advance regional EMS collaboration, innovation, and accountability; and
WHEREAS, given the technical complexity of ambulance service procurement, the City requires the expertise of AP Triton to assist with preparing a competitive and compliant proposal; and WHEREAS, AP Triton, based on past work for the City associated with this larger matter, is privy to sensitive City information that includes system evaluations and financial projections, and going out to competitive bid would prejudice the City and the sensitivity of that information; and WHEREAS, the City Council approves sole source findings under Section 5.0 of City’s Purchasing and Payment Procedures Manual, in awarding the consulting services to AP Triton contemplated by this item; and
WHEREAS, the total cost of AP Triton’s consulting services is $255,749, of which the City of Paso Robles’ share estimated cost is $50,753.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council authorizes participation in the San Luis Obispo County Ambulance Services RFP.

Section 3. The City Council approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with AP Triton in the amount of $255,749, with the City’s share being

Page 175 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
estimated at $50,753 for consulting services necessary to prepare and submit a competitive proposal.

Section 4. The City find that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)- (3), 15378 because the contemplated actions will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

APPROVED this 16th day of September, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Martin, City Clerk

Page 176 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: Caleb Davis, Deputy Police Chief
Subject: Annual Report on Military Equipment Use Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481 and Renewal of Ordinance No. 1119
CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

1. Assembly Bill(AB) 481 went into law in 2021 and requireslaw enforcement agencies to obtain approval of a Military Equipment Use Policy through that agency’s governing body (i.e., City Council) prior to taking certain actions related to funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

2. On June 21, 2022, the City adopted Ordinance 1119 N.S., approving the Military Equipment Use Policy.

3. In accordance with the Policy, the Chief of Police, or their designee, must annually submit to the City Council a military equipment report which details information about how and when the military equipment was used in the preceding calendar year (Government Code 7072).

4. The Paso Robles Police Department possesses and uses equipment regulated by this ordinance (Attachment 1).

5. The Police Department has implemented a military use policy in accordance with Assembly Bill 481 (Attachment 2). Per the policy, section 706.1, the Paso Robles Police Department must submit an annual report for military equipment use.

6. The term “military equipment” is defined in California Government Code 7070(c) and includes many items which are considered industry standard, are commercially produced, not obtained from the military.

7. AB 481 also requires the City Council to review and vote on whether to renew the military equipment use ordinance at a regular meeting (Government Code 7071).

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Approve the annual military equipment report pursuant to California Government Code 7072 and vote to renew Ordinance 1119 N.S.;

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
AB 481 was enacted to increase transparency, accountability, and oversight surrounding the use and acquisition of military equipment by state and local law enforcement. It requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval from the legislative bodies that oversee them before purchasing, raising

Page 177 of 520 ends

funds for, or acquiring military equipment, by any means. Law enforcement agencies are also required to obtain approval by theirlegislative bodies before collaboratingwith anotherlawenforcement agency in the deployment or use of military equipment within the law enforcement agencies’ jurisdiction, or before using any new or existing military equipment not previously approved.

Under AB 481, a governing body approval must take the form of an ordinance adopting a publicly released, written military equipment use policy, which must address a number of specific topics, including the type, quantity, capabilities, purposes, and authorized uses of each type of military equipment,the fiscal impact oftheir acquisition and use,the legal and proceduralrulesthat govern their use, the training required by any officer allowed to use them, the mechanisms in place to ensure policy compliance, and the procedures by which the public may register complaints. This ordinance must be renewed by a vote of the governing body each year.

AB 481 also requires any law enforcement agency that receives approval for the use of military equipment to submit annual reports to the governing body regarding the use of the equipment, any complaintsreceived, any internal audits or otherinformation about violations ofthe military equipment use policy, the cost of such use, and other similar information. Law enforcement incidents can be unpredictable and complex. In order to de-escalate violent and tense situations, at times special equipment, tools or resources may be necessary to reduce the possibility of harm to community members, individuals directly involved in the incident and officers and increase the likelihood of a positive outcome. Items identified as “military equipment” include, but are not limited to, unmanned aerial (Drones)or groundvehicles, bulletproof vehicles, pepperballs, lesslethal 40mmprojectile launchers and distraction devices. These tools have been tested in the field and are used to help enhance citizen safety, officer safety and reduce the need for escalation of force. They are commonly utilized by law enforcement, and their use is considered best practices. The Department has not discovered other reasonable alternatives for these tools that can achieve the same objectives of community member safety and officer safety as these tools can do.

TheDepartmentis committed to utilizing equipmentthat helpsto safeguard the community and reduce the risk of escalating volatile situations that might rise to the level of a lethal encounter.

TheOrdinance and Policy #706 provide forsafeguardsto the public’ssafety, welfare, and civilrights and ensures transparency, oversight and accountability measures are in place. The Department will be required to conduct annual audits of the equipment to ensure compliance with the policy, annually report to City Council the use of this equipment, seek approval prior to purchasing tools deemed to be “military equipment.”
Department policy requires the Paso Robles Police Department to hold at least one wellpublicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting where community members may discuss and ask questions regarding the Annual Military Equipment Report. Meetings must be held within 30 days of posting this report on the Department website. The Paso Robles Police Department will provide this opportunity on September 16, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter, during the City’s regularly scheduled City Council meeting.

In fiscal year 24-25 the Paso Robles Police Department purchased two(2) DJI M30T Drones. Each drone kit includes: Thermal camera laser rangefinder, 1 spotlight w/ speaker, 1RC controller, 8 TB30 flight batteries, 1 battery charging case, and 1 Airworx Go-Command case with 24” ultra bright screen and portable power supply.

Page 178 of 520 ends

Fiscal Impact
None.

CEQA
The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378 because it has no potential to result in either a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment.

Recommendation (Option 2)
Approve the annual military equipment report pursuant to California Government Code 7072 and vote to renew Ordinance 1119 N.S.

Attachments

1. Military Equipment Annual Report 2025

2. Paso Robles Police Department Military Equipment Policy No. 706

Page 179 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
2025 MILITARY EQUIPMENT REPORT

1. Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS): An unmanned aircraft along with the associated equipment necessary to control it remotely.
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. DJI MATRICE M30T, cost: $17,779 each. Quantity: 2, UAS Kit includes thermal wide zoom camera, laser rangefinder, spotlight, controller, 8 flight batteries including charger and case. Airworx GoCommand weatherproof case with 24” monitor. ii. DJI MAVIC ENTERPRISE DUAL ADVANCED, cost: approx. $7,000 with accessories. Purchased 1 no cost for the second, was received on County Homeland Security Grant, quantity: 2, UAS that has a color and inferred camera as well as audible speaker and light. Capable of video recording and weighs approximately 899 grams, approx. 30 minutes of flight time.
iii. DJI MAVIC MINI, cost: $500 each, quantity: 2. Miniature UAS that weighs approximately 249 grams and is able to record video and audio with approximately 30 minutes of flight time.
b. Purpose
To be deployed when its view would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
i. Major collision investigations.
ii. Search for missing persons.
iii. Natural disaster management.
iv. Crime scene photography.
v. SWAT, tactical or other public safety and life preservation missions. vi. In response to specific requests from local, state or federal fire authorities for fire response and/or prevention.
c. Authorized Use
Only assigned operators who have completed the required training and received a Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate shall be permitted to operate any UAS during approved missions. The Department currently has 7 certified UAS pilots. d. Expected Life Span
All UAS equipment, 3-4 years.

Page 180 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
e. Fiscal Impact Annual maintenance and battery replacement cost is approximately $ 3,000
f. Training
All Department UAS operators are licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration for UAS operation. In addition, each operator must attend training updates throughout the year. The department conducted 4 hours of UAS training. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
Use is established under FAA Regulation 14 CFR Part 107, and Department policy. It is the policy of the Department to utilize UAS only for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.
h. Complaints
The Department has not received any complaints concerning the use of UAS.

2. 40 MM Launchers and Rounds: 40MM Launchers are utilized by Department personnel as a less lethal tool to launch impact rounds. a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM SINGLE SHOT LAUNCHER,
cost $1100, quantity: 12. The 40MM Single Launcher is a tactical single shot launcher that features a rifle-type stock and a Front Grip (FG) with light rail. It will fire standard 40mm less lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length. It will launch a 40MM less lethal round up to 131 feet and is only authorized to be used by officers who have received training from a Peace Officer Standards and Training “POST” certified instructor.
ii. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM CS FERRET, cost $ 30 per
round, quantity: 30. The ferret round is deployed from a 40mm launcher and contains CS (2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile) gas.

The ferret is used to deploy CS gas from a safe distance. iii. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM EXTENDED RANGE DIRECT
IMPACT, cost $30 per round, quantity: 40. A less lethal light weight expanding foam projectile used for longer distances.
iv. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM STANDARD RANGE DIRECT
IMPACT, cost $30 per round; quantity: 120. A less lethal light weight expanding foam projectile used for close range applications.

Page 181 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
b. Purpose
To limit the escalation of conflict.
c. Authorized Use
Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
i. Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. ii. Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
iii. Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. iv. Potentially vicious animals.
v. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
d. Lifespan
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM SINGLE SHOT LAUNCHER, – 15 years.

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM CS FERRET – 5 years.

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM EXTENDED RANGE DIRECT – 5 years. e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance is approximately $10 for each launcher. f. Training
Sworn members utilizing 40MM less lethal chemical agents or impact rounds are trained in their use by POST certified less lethal and chemical agent’s instructors. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the DEPARTMENT to utilize the 40mm only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
h. Complaints
The Department has not received any complaints concerning the use of 40MM Launchers.

3. Distraction Devices: A device used to distract dangerous persons. a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, model 8902 Distraction Device,
quantity: 3. A low roll distraction device that produces a loud bang

Page 182 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
with a bright light. Ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during a hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations. ii. LIBERTY DYNAMIC, Reloadable Noise Flash Diversion Device, cost $130 each, quantity: 16. A low roll distraction device that produces a loud bang with a bright light. Ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during a hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations.
iii. LIBERTY DYNAMIC, Reload for Noise Flash Diversion Device, cost $45 each, quantity: 24. This is the reload for the distraction device once it has been used.
b. Purpose
A distraction device is ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations. To produce atmospheric overpressure and brilliant white light and, as a result, can cause short-term (6 - 8 seconds) physiological/psychological sensory deprivation to give officers a tactical advantage.
c. Authorized Use
Diversionary Devices shall only be used:
i. By officers who have been trained in their proper use. ii. In hostage and barricaded subject situations.
iii. In high-risk warrant (search/arrest) services where there may be extreme hazards to officers.
iv. During other high-risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety.
v. During training exercises.
d. Lifespan
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, model 8902 Distraction Device - 5 years.

LIBERTY DYNAMIC, Noise Flash Diversion Device – 5 years. e. Fiscal Impact
No annual maintenance.
f. Training
Prior to use, officers must attend diversionary device training that is conducted by POST certified instructors.

Page 183 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the DEPARTMENT to utilize diversion devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.
h. Complaints
The Department has not received any complaints concerning the use of Distraction Devices. .

8. Rifles: Guns that are fired from shoulder level, having a long spirally grooved barrel intended to make bullets spin and thereby have greater accuracy over a long distance.
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. Barrett .50 Caliber rifle, Model 82A1M, no cost, rifle was donated covering the entire estimated cost of $8500 each, quantity: 1. A semi-automatic rifle used by officers assigned to the special weapons and tactics “SWAT” team as snipers. The use of the rifle is reserved for disabling a vehicle in incidents where lethal force is justified, and no other reasonable means exist to stop the vehicle to protect innocent life.
ii. Barret .50 Caliber Ammunition, M33 661GR rifle round, cost $10 per round, quantity 60. A FMJ bullet designed to penetrate barriers. iii. Accuracy International.308 caliber rifle, Model R11894, cost $4,500, quantity: 2. A highly accurate and durable bolt action rifle used by officers assigned to the SWAT team as snipers.
iv. Hornady .308 Caliber Ammunition, 168GR ELD TAP, cost $1.25 per round. quantity:1000. A highly accurate round designed to penetrate common barriers but prevent overpenetration.
b. Purpose
To be used as precision weapons to address a threat with more precision and/or greater distances than a handgun, if present and feasible. c. Authorized Use
Only members that are POST certified are authorized to use a rifle. d. Lifespan Barrett .50 Caliber rifle, Model 82A1M - 15 years.

Page 184 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
Barret .50 Caliber Ammunition, M33 661gr rifle round – 5 years.

Accuracy International .308 caliber rifle, Model R11894 – 15 years.

Hornady .308 Caliber Ammunition, 168gr ELD TAP – 5 years. e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance is approximately $50 for each firearm. f. Training
Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification two times a year.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the DEPARTMENT to utilize rifles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.
h. Complaints
The Department has not received any complaints concerning the use of Rifles.

9. Chemical Agent and Smoke Canisters: Canisters that contain chemical agents that are released when deployed.
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, SMOKE CANISTER
(5210 B), cost $38, quantity: 6. When deployed, the canister emits a cloud of smoke used to cover or conceal movement.

The canister is baffled to reduce the risk of fire and is indoor safe.
ii. COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, Triple-PHASER CS
CANISTER (5231), cost $44 each, quantity: 8. The canister consists of three separate canisters pressed together with separating charges between each. When deployed, the
canisters separate and land approximately 20 feet apart allowing for an increased dispersal area of CS gas. The canister is designed for outdoor use in crowd control
situations
b. Purpose

Page 185 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
i. Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. ii. Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
iii. Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. iv. Potentially vicious animals.
v. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
c. Authorized Use
Only officers who have received POST certification in the use chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents.
d. Lifespan
COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, SMOKE CANISTER (5210 B) - 5 years.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, Triple-PHASER CS CANISTER (5231) – 5 years.
e. Fiscal Impact
No annual maintenance
f. Training
Sworn members utilizing chemical agent canisters are certified by POST less lethal and chemical agents instructors.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the DEPARTMENT to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
h. Complaints
The Department has not received any complaints concerning the use of Chemical Agent and Smoke Canisters:

10. PepperBall Launcher: A device that discharges irritant projectiles. a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.

Page 186 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
i. TIPPMANN PEPPERBALL LAUNCHER, cost $800, quantity:

2. The TIPPMANN is a compressed-air powered launcher
designed to fire non-lethal PepperBall projectiles.
ii. PEPPERBALL LIVE PROJECTILE, cost $2.38, quantity:
480. The LIVE projectile contains 2% PAVA pepper powder, and is designed for direct impact and area saturation,
especially in confined, interior spaces. Discharged from a PepperBall Launcher, the projectile has a velocity 280-350 FPS. The projectile has a direct impact of 60ft and an area of saturation of 150+ft. The projectile contains 0.5% PAVA Powder. iii. PEPPERBALL GLASS BREAKER PROJECTILE,
cost $2.90, quantity: 40. The GLASS BREAKER is designed to break glass in tactical situations. Discharged from a PepperBall Launcher it is loaded one at a time.
b. Purpose
To limit the escalation of conflict. Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include but are not limited to:
i. Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. ii. Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
iii. Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. iv. Potentially vicious animals.
v. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
c. Authorized Use
Only those officers who have been trained in the use of PepperBall launchers are authorized to use the PepperBall launchers.
d. Lifespan
PEPPERBALL SX LAUNCHER - 15 years.

PEPPERBALL LIVE PROJECTILE – 5 years.

PEPPERBALL GLASS BREAKER PROJECTLE – 5 years.
e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance is approximately $25 for each launcher. No annual maintenance for munitions.
f. Training

Page 187 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
Sworn members utilizing PepperBall launchers and projectiles are trained in their use by POST certified less lethal and chemical agents instructors. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the DEPARTMENT to utilize PepperBall only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.
h. Complaints
The Department has not received any complaints concerning the use of PepperBall Launchers.

11. Shotgun Breaching Tools: Tools that are used to conduct an explosive breach. a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. BENELLI M4 BREACHING SHOTGUN, cost $1,900 each,
quantity: 1. This weapon allows for breachers to safely utilize shotgun breaching rounds in order to destroy deadbolts, locks, and hinges. The stand-off that is attached to the end of the barrel allows for positive placement of the gun into the correct position and vents gases to prevent overpressure. ii. ROYAL ARMS TESAR-2 BACK CAP 425 GRAIN COPPER
FRANGILBE BREACHING ROUND, cost $4.50 per round,
quantity: 20. The round is fired from a breaching shotgun and is used to destroy deadbolts, locks and hinges.
b. Purpose
To safely gain entry into a structure.
c. Authorized Use
Shotgun breaching may only occur after authorization by the Incident Commander or SWAT Commander in the field, and during training exercises. d. Lifespan
BENELLI M4 BREACHING SHOTGUN – 15 years.

ROYAL ARMS TESAR-2 FRANGILBE BREACHING ROUND – 5 years. e. Fiscal Impact Annual maintenance is approximately $10 for shotgun. No annual maintenance for munitions.
f. Training

Page 188 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
All officers who use shotgun breaching tools shall be certified by POST instructors in the operation and use of shotgun breaching. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the DEPARTMENT to utilize breaching tools only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law. h. Complaints
The Department has not received any complaints concerning the use of Shotgun Breaching Tools.

12. Additional Information:

The Department has not retired any approved military equipment over the past year and currently does not intend to acquire any additional military equipment at this time.

Page 189 of 520 ends

Attachment 2

Page 190 of 520 ends

Attachment 2

Page 191 of 520 ends

Attachment 2

Page 192 of 520 ends

Attachment 2

Page 193 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: Ditas Esperanza, Capital Projects Engineer
Subject: Approval of a Resolution Awarding a Construction Contract for Road Repairs of the Sunset, Panorama, and Crestline Neighborhood
CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under the Class 1 exemption, which applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features where the project involves negligible or no expansion of existing or former use (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15301).

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

1. At the November 1, 2022 City Council meeting, City Council received the 1st Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2022-23, including the financial status of Measure J-20 (hereinafter referred to as J-20), the City’s one cent supplemental sales tax approved by voters in 2020. At that meeting, City Council directed staff to develop a list of streets and roads requiring street maintenance using J-20 reserve funds.

2. As noted in the financial report, unappropriated J-20 reserves totaled approximately $4 million on June 30, 2022. This is mainly due to police officer recruitment and the time it has taken to hire additional personnel. As a result, the one-time salary savings allocated for those positions have been put into J-20 reserves.

3. On January 17, 2025 the City Council authorized staff to use unappropriated Measure J-20 funds to repair and resurface the streets within the Sunset, Panorama, and Crestline neighborhoods.

4. Plans and specifications were prepared and advertised for bid with an engineer’s estimate for the project of $2,100,000, as part of a formal Request for Proposal process consistent with City’s Purchasing Policy.

5. On August 21, 2025, five (5) bids were received as follows:

Westrock General Engineering $1,619,999.00 Calportland Construction $ 1,817,302.00 Papich Construction $1,676,676.00 V. Lopez and Sons $1,835,116.20 Ferravanti Grading & Paving $1,678,316.10

6. Staff reviewed the lowest bid from Westrock General Engineering and found it to be a responsive and responsible bid.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Award a construction contract to Westrock General Engineering to perform designated road repairs for the Sunset, Panorama, and Crestline Neighborhood Project, in the amount of $1,619,999; or

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Page 194 of 520 ends

Analysis and Conclusions
The Sunset, Panorama, and Crestline neighborhood is one of the older neighborhoods on the west side of the city with roads needing significant repair. The pavement condition index (PCI) in this neighborhood ranges from 18 to 34 (with 100 being best). Proposed treatment repair is heavy rehabilitation (full pavement overlay). There are no curbs, gutters, or sidewalks in the neighborhood, so upgrades are not required.

The use of Measure J-20 supplemental sales tax reserve funds for the Sunset, Panorama, and Crestline neighborhood road repair project is in alignment with the Council adopted priorities for the funds: fire and emergency services, police services and street repair and maintenance.

Fiscal Impact
The total cost of the construction contract with Westrock General Engineering is $1,619,999. The project is included in the adopted FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement budget, and as such, no other action is needed.

CEQA
The City finds that this action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under the Class 1 exemption, which applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features where the project involves negligible or no expansion of existing or former use (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15301).

Recommendation (Option 2)
Approve Resolution 25-XXX authorizing the City Manager to award a contract to Westrock General Engineering to perform road repairs to Sunset, Panorama, and Crestline Neighborhood Project, in the amount of $1,619,999.00, and authorizing the City Manager and City Attorney to make minor, technical, or non-substantive changes to the contract that are consistent with the Council action.

Attachments

1. Resolution 25-XXX – Sunset, Panorama, and Crestline Neighborhood

2. Westrock General Engineering Bid

3. Location Map

Page 195 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR ROAD REPAIRS FOR THE

SUNSET, PANORAMA, AND CRESTLINE NEIGHBORHOOD
WHEREAS, on November 1, 2022, City Council received the 1st Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2022-23, including the financial status of Measure J-20 (hereinafter referred to as J-20), the City’s one cent supplemental sales tax approved by voters in 2020; and WHEREAS, City Council directed staff to develop a list of streets and roads to use J-20 reserve funds towards for additional street maintenance; and
WHEREAS, on January 17, 2025 City Council authorized the use of unappropriated Measure J-20 funds to repair and resurface the streets within the Sunset, Panorama, and Crestline neighborhood; and WHEREAS, plans and specifications were prepared and advertised for bid with an engineer’s estimate of $2,100,000 as part of a formal Request for Proposal process consistent with City’s Purchasing Policy and on August 21, 2025, five (5) bids were received ranging from $1,619,999.00 to $1,835,116.20; and WHEREAS, City staff reviewed the lowest bid from Westrock Construction and found it to be a responsive and responsible bid.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Award a construction contract to Westrock General Engineering to perform road repairs within the Sunset, Panorama, and Crestline Neighborhood, in the amount of $1,619,999, and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Agreement, subject to any minor, technical, or non-substantive changes as approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.

Section 3. The City finds that this action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under the Class 1 exemption, which applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features where the project involves negligible or no expansion of existing or former use (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15301).

APPROVED this 16th day of September, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Martin, City Clerk

Page 196 of 520 ends

1.1 Bid.
00 41 43 - BID FORMS

BID FORM
Bids will be received at the City of El Paso de Robles Public Works Administration, 4305 Second Wind Way, Paso Robles, CA 93446, until 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 21, 2025.

NAME OF BIDDER: Wes+r-ocK e1ene co..\ [ n@ i V\ ee � i � To the Honorable City Council
of the City of El Paso de Robles
4305 Second Wind Way
Paso Robles, California 93446
The undersigned hereby declare that we have carefully examined the location of the proposed Work, and have read and examined the Contract Documents, including all plans, specifications, and all addenda, if any for the following Project:

Panorama and Fairview Neighborhood Road Repairs, DPW 23-02 We hereby propose to furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, and services, and to discharge all duties and obligations necessary and required to perform and complete the Project, as described and in strict conformity with the Drawings, and these Specifications for TOTAL BID PRICE indicated herein.

The undersigned acknowledges receipt, understanding, and full consideration of the following addenda to the Contract Documents:

Addenda No. ---J ------------------

1. Attached is the required Bid Guarantee in the amount of not less than 10% of the Total Bid Price.

2. Attached is the completed Designation of Subcontractors form.

3. Attached is the fully executed Noncollusion Declaration form.

4. Attached is the completed Iran Contracting Act Certification form.

5. Attached is the completed Public Works Contractor Registration Certification form.

6. Attached is the completed Contractor's Certificate Regarding Workers' Compensation form.

7. Attached is the completed Bidder Information and Experience form.

8. Site Visit Affidavit

9. Proposed Major Equipment and Material Suppliers

10. Fleet Compliance Certification
82477.07000\31456712.1 -19- 00 41 43- BID FORMS
Attachment 2

Page 197 of 520 ends

BID FORM

BID SCHEDULE
A. BID SCHEDULE

ITEM BID ITEMS PAYMENT UNIT TOTAL
NO. REFERENCE QUANTITIES UNIT PRICE *TOTAL COST
1 Mobilization, Bonds & Insurance TS-1.16 LS 1 $158,000.00 $158,000.00 Notification of Residents,
2 Businesses & Aaencies TS-1.16 LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 3 Traffic Control TS-2.06 LS 1 $55,882.50 $55,882.50
Storm Water Pollution Control
4 Proaram TS-3.04 LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00
Preserving Survey Monumentation
5 (Allowance) TS-4.02 LS 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00
6 3/8" HMA Tvoe A <PG 64-10) TS-5.05 TN 1 551 $150.00 $232,650.00 7 1/2" HMA Tvce A PG 76-22TR TS-5.05 TN 2,073 $210.00 $435,330.00 8 Remove & Reclace 5" HMA TS-7.04 SF 22,000 $6.75 $148,500.00 9 Remove 8" & Reclace 6" HMA TS-7.04 SF 36,000 $7.00 $252,000.00 6" Deep Lift Stabilization
10 (Allowance) TS-7.04 SF 1,500 $9.25 $13,875.00
Remove & Replace I Construct
11 Type "A" HMA Dike TS-5.05 LF 2,649 $15.50 $41,059.50 Remove & Replace I Construct
12 Tvoe "E" HMA Dike TS-5.05 LF 16 $15.50 $248.00
Type A Keycut (See Plan and
13 Detail) TS-6.04 LF 2 936 $4.00 $11,744.00
Type B Keycut (See Plan and
14 Detail) TS-6.04 LF 222 $5.00 $1,110.00
15 Install Shoulder Backina TS-11.06 LF 1,185 $9.00 $10,665.00 Remove & Replace PCC Driveway
16 (Residential) TS-9.04 SF 738 $40.00 $29,520.00
17 Install PCC Rolled Curb & Gutter TS-9.04 LF 470 $190.00 $89,300.00 18 Prune & Remove Tree Roots TS-10.04 SF 6 $200.00 $1,200.00 19 Lower Manhole Frame & Cover TS-10.04 EA 4 $900.00 $3,600.00 20 Lower Water Valve Frame & Cover TS-10.04 EA 6 $900.00 $5,400.00 82477.07000\31456712.1 -20- 00 41 43- BID FORMS
Attachment 2

Page 198 of 520 ends

21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34

BID FORM
Lower Sewer Clean-Out Cover TS-10.04 EA 1 $900.00 $900.00 Lower Water Meter Box & Cover TS-10.04 EA 4 $900.00 $3,600.00 Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to $1,200.00 $14,400.00 Finish Grade TS-10.04 EA 12 Adjust Water Valve Frame &
Cover to Finish Grade TS-10.04 EA 20 $1,200.00 $24,000.00 Adjust Sewer Clean-Out Cover to
Finish Grade TS-10.04 EA 1 $1,200.00 $1-200.00
Adjust Water Meter Box & Cover
to Finish Grade TS-10.04 EA 4 $1 200.00 $4 800.00
Adjust Electrical Vault to Finish
Grade TS-10.04 EA 1 g;1 i:;nn nn $1,500.00
Install Blue RPM ® Fire Hvdrant TS-11.05 EA 13 $13.00 $169.00 12-inch White Crosswalk/Limit $3,000.00 Line (Thermo) TS-11.05 LF 120 $25.00 Pavement Marking "STOP" $329.00 $1,316.00 Leaend (Thermo) TS-11.05 EA 4 Trim Veaetation in Work Zone TS-1.16 LS 1 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 Paint Red Curb TS-11.05 LS 1 $1,120.00 $1,120.00
Remove & Replace Guardrail w/
End Caps TS-12.04 LF 367 $130.00 $47,710.00
Pre-Construction Video
Documentation LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00
GRAND TOTAL: $1619 999.00
BIDDER'S COMPANY: WESTROCK LL ESTROCK GENERAL ENGINEERING The costs for any Work shown or required in the Contract Documents, but not specifically identified as a line item are to be included in the related line items and no additional compensation shall be due to Contractor for the performance of the Work.

In case of discrepancy between the Unit Price and the Item Cost set forth for a unit basis item, the unit price shall prevail and shall be utilized as the basis for determining the lowest responsive, responsible Bidder. However, if the amount set forth as a unit price is ambiguous, unintelligible or uncertain for any cause, or is omitted, or is the same amount as the entry in the "Item Cost" 824 77. 07000\31456712 .1 -21- 00 41 43 - BID FORMS
Attachment 2

Page 199 of 520 ends

BID FORM
column, then the amount set forth in the "Item Cost" column for the item shall prevail and shall be divided by the estimated quantity for the item and the price thus obtained shall be the Unit Price.

For the purpose of evaluating Bids, the City will correct any apparent errors in the extension of unit prices and any apparent errors in the addition of lump sum and extended prices.

The estimated quantities for Unit Price items are for purposes of comparing Bids only and the City makes no representation that the actual quantities of work performed will not vary from the estimates. Final payment shall be determined by the Engineer from measured quantities of work performed based upon the Unit Price.

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE:

TOTAL BID PRICE BASED ON BID SCHEDULE TOTAL OF UNIT PRICES FOR ITEMS NOS. 1-34 $ $1,619,999.00
Total Bid Price in Numbers
$ ONE MILLION SIX HUNDRED NINETEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY-NINE DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS Total Bid Price in Written Form
In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

The undersigned agrees that this Bid Form constitutes a firm offer to the City which cannot be withdrawn for the number of calendar days indicated in the Notice Inviting Bids from and after the Bid opening, or until a Contract for the Work is fully executed by the City and a third party, whichever is earlier.

Upon receipt of the signed contract and other required documents, the contract will be executed by the City, after which the City will prepare a letter giving Contractor Notice to Proceed. The official starting date shall be the date of the Notice to Proceed, unless otherwise specified. The undersigned agrees to begin the Work within ten (10) working days of the date of the Notice to Proceed, unless otherwise specified.

The undersigned has examined the location of the proposed work and is familiar with the Drawings and Specifications and the local conditions at the place where work is to be done.

If awarded the contract, the undersigned agrees that there shall be paid by the undersigned and by all subcontractors to all laborers, workers and mechanics employed in the execution of such contract no less than the prevailing wage rate within San Luis Obispo County for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to complete the Work contemplated by this contract as established by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations.

Enclosed find cash, bidder's bond, or cashier's or certified check No. N/A from the N /& Bank in the amount of -----'-N_/,�'.4-�--------' which is not 82477.07000\31456712.1 -22- 00 41 43 - BID FORMS
Attachment 2

Page 200 of 520 ends

BID FORM
less than ten percent (10%) of this bid, payable to City of El Paso de Robles as bid security and which is given as a guarantee that the undersigned will enter into a contract and provide the necessary bonds and certificates of insurance if awarded the Work.

The bidder furthermore agrees that in case of bidder's default in executing said contract and furnishing required bonds and certificates of insurance, the cash, bidder's bond, or cashier's or certified check accompanying this proposal and the money payable thereon shall become and shall remain the property of the City of El Paso de Robles.

Bidder is an individual ___
, or corporation ___ , or partnership X , organized under the laws of the State of ___
C=a=•�fu: �c�ll�•·cA�-------
Bidder confirms license(s) required by California State Contractor's License Law for the performance of the subject project are in full effect and proper order. The following are the Bidder's applicable license number(s), with their expiration date(s) and class of license(s):

If the Bidder is a joint venture, each member of the joint venture must include the required licensing information.

Sureties that will furnish the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Payment Bond, in the form specified herein, in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date the City provides the successful bidder the Notice of Award. Sureties must meet all of the State of California bonding requirements, as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120 and must be authorized by the State of California.

The insurance company or companies to provide the insurance required in the contract documents must have a Financial Strength Rating of not less than "A-" and a Financial Size Category of not less than "Class VII" according to the latest Best Key Rating Guide. At the sole discretion of the City, the City may waive the Financial Strength Rating and the Financial Size Category classifications for Workers' Compensation insurance. (signatures continued on next page)
82477.07000\31456712.1 -23- 00 41 43 - BID FORMS
Attachment 2

Page 201 of 520 ends

BID FORM
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all of the information submitted in connection with this Bid and all of the representations made herein are true and correct.

Executed at fuKt.r&6eld IJA
(Co:-porate Seal)
, on this 20 .,"'day of A 'a"�-t- , 202 'S.
(Bidders Name - Print or Type)
�� <b.cce-# Brow�, Mo.nMhf M-e�-�---
Names of individual members of firm or names and titles of all officers of corporation and their addresses are listed below:

Ti
tle __ M_a=tt-�----'�~q_....M .... " .. wi�hv:_,,__ _____ _ Complete Address J71Cf f/\Jin+hmP W0'l &!<el'{5Al!.td t!A: 5;,314 I I
Phone /»I� '-lqb -4265 FAX N/A
Name Phi.Hip
Complete Address
fJcaw(l
13l'3
Phone 66/- '578- I bt}I)
l,4do
Title M�ttf>f} i "J
; t(A,'I fM:ce�t
FAX tJ/lr•
Membec
I 50 k'er56·efd eA o/:3$/L(
Name N/A Tit
le _______________ _
Complete Address ________________________ _
Phone ------------- FAX --------------
Name N/A , Title _______________ _
Complete Address ________________________ _
Phone _____________ FAX _____________ _
82477.07000\31456712.1 -24- 00 41 43 - BID FORMS
Attachment 2

Page 202 of 520 ends

ij
ft

;tMU
KUt<e
2t;!
o
;NU
U

,*8*<$4U89@*> U

@-*U(98@<$(@9<U.>U<*>:98>.'4*U+9<U9'@$.8.8,U$44U8*(*>>$<IU:*<6.@>U@9 (96:4*@*UD9<3

+9<U$<*$>U@9U'*U<*69C*)UU<*:4$(*)U@-*U(98@<$(@9-$44U984IU<*69C* 6$@*<.$4U;B$8@1@.*>U@-$@U($8U'*U<*:4$(*)U)B<.8,U@-*U>$6*UD9<3U)$I
@-*U(98@<$(@9-$44U'*U<*>:98>.'4*U+9<U<*:$.<.8,U)$6$,*U@9U$8IU:B'4.(U9< :<.C$@*[email protected].@.*>U$8)9@<B(@B<*>U>-9D8U9<U89@U>-9D8U98U@-*>*U:4$8> U@-*
(98@<$(@9<U.>U<*;B.<*)U@9U@$3*U)B*U:<*([email protected]$<IU6*$>B<*>U@9U:<9@*(@U@-* [email protected].@.*>U9@<B(@B<*>U+9B8)U$@U@-*U?.@*U.@U>-$44U'*U@-*U(98@<$(@9<> <*>:98>.'.4.@IU@9U89@.+IU@-*U9D8*<>U9+U@-*[email protected].@.*>U9@<B(@B<*>U'*+9<* >@$<@.8,UD9<3U
U-9B<>U$)C$8(*U89@.(*U<*;B.<*)

tt
@-*U(98@<$(@9-$44U(98@$(@UB8)*<,<9B8)U>*<C.(*U$4*<@U$@U U$@U4*$>@U@D9
UD9<3.8,U)$I>U:<.9<U@9U@-*U(966*8(*6*8@U9+U(98>@<B(@.98U@[email protected].@I 9D8*<>U@9U6$<3U@-*U49([email protected]+U@-*.<U<*>:*(@.C*UB8)*<,<9B8) +$(.4.@.*>[email protected].@.*>U:B'4.(U9<U:<.C$@*U>-9D8U9<U89@U>-9D8U98U@-*>*U:4$8> @-*U(98@<$(@9-$44U(96:4IUD.@-U$44U$::4.($'4*U).C.>.98U9+U.8)B>@<.$4 <*[email protected]>U($4
9>-$U>$+*AIU>@$8)$<)>U.8U$((9<)$8(*UD.@-U>*(@/98U

U9+U@-*U >>:E(
U.+U<*;B*>@*)U'IU@-*U.8>:*(@9<U@-*U(98@<$(@9-$44U:<9C.)*U:<99+U9+U $U:*<6.@U+<96U($4 9>-%U

:<.9<U@9U(966*8(*6*8@U9+UD9<3U*H.>@.8,U,<$>>U$8)UD**)>U.8U@-*U:<92*(@ <9$)D$I>U>-$44U'*U)*>@<9I*)U'IU$::4.([email protected]+UD**)U3.44*<> U>**U<9$)F&IU
:<*:$<[email protected]@*(-8.($4U>:*(.+.([email protected]>
U

(98@<$(@9<U.>U<*>:98>.'4*U+9<U@<.66.8,U$44UC*,*@[email protected][email protected]<3UJ98*U@-$@ D.44U.8@*<+*<*UD.@-UD9<3U (98@<$(@9-$44U<*69C*U$8)U).>:9>*U9+U$44U)*'<.> U

*H.>@.8,U:$.8@*)U(B<'U89@U>-9D8
U(98@<$(@9<U.>U<*>:98>.'4*U+9<U:<*:$<.8,U$8)
<*:[email protected],U*H.>@.8,U:$.8@*)U(B<'[email protected]@-*U4.6.@>U9+UD9<3U@9U6$@(-U*H.>@.8, B84*>>U9@-*<D.>*U).<*(@*)U'IU@-*U(.@I

)*:@-U9+U*H.>@.8,U:$C*6*8@UC$<.*>
U(98@<$(@9<U.>U<*>:98>.'4*U+9<U<*69C/8,
$8)U9++U-$B4.8,U$44U,<.8).8,>U.8(4B).8,U$8IU>B',<$)*U6$@*<.$4U*8(9B8@*<*) (98@<$(@9-$44U).>:9>*U9+U$44U(98>@<B(@.98UG>@*U.8U$U4*,$4U7$88*= 2%*6 #
C
7?AC&
+8
,-C
3 @$':C8

";<.(C 49/ =C
2BC580!>C)1CC

n"#L$H%@&'4Q(8)NC*D@+[Q,T->.X/D_k@t01

bt

RU
t
t

a6\AYt
7RIt
t

t

R

Et

Eth5OZUR OF??JA Z9BUUKt

O#
PQU

8@>U

]Bt Z]t ct

VGURAAYt

t

mt

@.@4*U>-**@U
+$.<C.*DU4$8*U
(<*>@4.8*U)<.C* U+$.<GIU4$8*U >B8>*@U)<.C*UU
C0>@$U(9B<@U
(<*>@4.8*U)<.C*U,4*8(<*>@U4$8*UU+$.<C.*DU4$8*U
:$89<$6$U)<.C*UU>B8>*@U)<.C*U
*84$<,*6*8@U$U
)<.C*GIU@<$8>[email protected])*@$.4UU<944*)U(B<'U)*@$.4U

t
t

U

$((*:@*)U'IU(.AIU9+U:$>9U<9'4*>!U
pt st

:t t

SU SU

t t
:t

t
t
:t lt LTU
3
LU

:t t

qtLU Wt S
t

`t gt t Mt dt

t
t lt t ^t Pt `t =t
rt

t

C*<.+IU

>($4*

'$<U<*:<*>*8@>U
U98U9<.,.8$4U

"U

Attachment
3

Page 203 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: Ditas Esperanza, Capital Projects Engineer
Subject: Approval of a Contract for Annual West Side Slurry Seal Road Maintenance Services CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under the Class 1 exemption, which applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features where the project involves negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15301).

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

1. To extend the useful life of city streets, from time to time a slurry seal treatment is applied to existing roadways. For the west side street segments (shown on Exhibit A), City staff proposes the use of a fiberized slurry seal as the appropriate repair technique. The repair project includes street segments on 10th Street, 12th Street, 13th Street, Olive Street and Pacific Avenue.

2. Fiberized slurry seal—although 20% to 25% more costly than standard slurry seal—is a more robust treatment as compared to standard slurry seal. The designated deteriorated west side streets particularly benefit from this specialized fiberized slurry seal. Additionally, dig-out repairs will also be performed at localized areas prior to placement of the fiberized slurry seal.

3. In 2023, the City completed placing fiberized slurry seal at Oak Street from 7th to 10th Street, 2nd from Vine to Spring Street, Oak Street from 1st to 2nd Street, and 3rd Street from Vine to Oak. Two years later these streets are performing well.

4. Staff prepared bid documents and advertised for bids for fiberized slurry seals on streets detailed on Exhibit A. The engineer’s estimate was $2,161,000.

5. At the bid opening on August 21, 2025, two (2) bids were received: Papich Construction $1,599,995, and R. Burke Construction $2,382,866.

6. Staff reviewed the bid from Papich Construction and found it to be the lowest responsive and responsible bid.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Award the contract to Papich Construction for the City’s Annual West Side Slurry Seal Maintenance project, in the amount of $1,599,995; or

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
As recommended in the City’s Pavement Maintenance Program, applying slurry seal treatment is an effective means of extending the pavement’s useful life at a minimum cost. The west side streets in question are slightly more deteriorated than the average street and benefit from a more robust slurry seal

Page 204 of 520 ends

application. In 2021, the City placed a test pilot of fiberized slurry seal on Tower Road east of Airport Road.

This treatment is performing well and is therefore recommended for this year’s west side street slurry seal maintenance.

Fiscal Impact
The total cost of the construction contract to Papich Construction is $1,599,995. The City’s FY 2025-26 budget includes this project utilizing annual gas tax allocations. As such, no other action is required.

CEQA
The City finds that this action is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under the Class 1 exemption, which applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features where the project involves negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15301).

Recommendation
Approve Resolution 25-XXX authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Papich Construction for the Annual West Side Slurry Seal Maintenance project, in the amount of $1,599,995, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement, subject to any minor, technical, or non-substantive changes as approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

Attachments

1. Resolution 25-XXX - Annual West Side Slurry Seal Road Maintenance Services a. Exhibit A – Road Segments

2. Papich Bid Proposal

Page 205 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR ANNUAL WEST SIDE SLURRY SEAL ROAD MAINTENANCE

SERVICES TO PAPICH CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, to extend the useful life of city streets a slurry seal treatment is applied to existing roadways; and
WHEREAS, for the west side streets shown on Exhibit A that include street segments on 10th Street, 12th Street, 13th Street, Olive Street and Pacific Avenue, the use of the more robust fiberized slurry seal is recommended along with localized dig out repairs; and WHEREAS, staff prepared bid documents and advertised for bids with an engineer’s estimate of $2,161,000 and at the bid opening on August 21, 2025, two (2) bids were received: Papich Construction $1,599,995, and R. Burke Construction $2,382,866; and
WHEREAS, City staff reviewed the lowest bid from Papich Construction and found it to be a responsive and responsible bid.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. As recommended in the City’s Pavement Maintenance Program, applying slurry seal treatment is an effective means of extending the pavement’s useful life at a minimum cost. The west side streets in question are slightly more deteriorated than the average street and require a more robust slurry seal application. In 2021, the City placed a test pilot of fiberized slurry seal on Tower Road east of Airport Road. This treatment is performing well and is therefore recommended for this year’s west side street slurry seal maintenance. In 2023, the City completed using fiberized slurry on a few west side streets, most notably 10th Street from 7th to 10th Street. Two years later these streets are performing well.

Section 3. The City Council hereby approves a contract with Papich Construction in the amount of $1,599,995 for the Annual West Side Slurry Seal Maintenance project, and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Agreement, subject to any minor, technical, or non-substantive changes as approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

Section 4. The City finds that this action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under the Class 1 exemption, which applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features where the project involves negligible or no expansion of existing or former use (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15301).

APPROVED this 16th day of September, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Page 206 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Martin, City Clerk
Exhibit A – Fiberized Slurry Seal Project Map

Page 207 of 520 ends

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
THE CONrAACTOH ISKESPONSIBlEFOR OBTAINING,._LLNECESSARYPERMllSTO

COMPLETE WORK
2 FOR AREAS TO BE REMOVED & REf>lACE:0 THE CONTR/ICTOR SHN..L ONLY REMOVE MATER""L au ... NTITIES THAT CAN BE REPLACED DURING THE SAME WORK DAY 3 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING DAMAGE TO ANY PUBLIC OR PRIV.O,TE UTILITIES AND/OR STRUCTURES SHOWN OA NOT SHOWN ON Tl l[S[ PLANS TIii:

CONTRACTOR IS REOUIREOTOTAKEDUEPRECAUTIONARYMEASURES TOPROTI::CTTHE UTILITIE50RSTRUCTURESFOUND/\T THESITE ITSHALLBE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE OV\INER5 Of THE UTrl lTIES OR STRUCTURES BEFORE STAATING WORK r◄e HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED!
' '111{.c:o,m,;&(;TQll�\lll.,W-Of-:t��-r,•n1.-rDilLl'4f'lllQ"l�,.r g�N
R
S�R8
�� ¢6 ��t�� s�i�1�o��fi��0�:TR��i� ...
1 1�c
g�+i;1�
EMENT
RESPECTIVE UNDERGROUND Fi'ICILJTIESIUTl.lTIES PUB UC OR PRIVATE SHOWN Ofi NOT liHOWN ON THFSF Pl ANS
� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL i'IPPLICI\SLE DIVISION OF I NOUS TRIAL ��s�i��SST�� :�� !��T� >zoc�:;,�� ::1 ��;�� 6�E APERMITFROMLJ,,L. QSHA
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF IVORK E:<.ISl ING GRASS AND WEEDS IN THE PROJEC r ROAD\11/AYS SHALL BE DESTROYED BY APPLICATION OF WEED KILLERS {SEE ROADWAY

PREPARATIONIN TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS)
f CC-��fMf1!MWilC..au.\U&llif'Ol��lOM:WT 't'tft.i.�""fi-lwi:at" �dlll"'9W.llltiO't.��r:F�-.t� I QilhOl'�QMlll.,..,lipCIM,()Clfl:�TOllllill�l:ll'(llll�Allt) REPAINTING �XI STING PAINTED CURf! WlTHIN THE LIMITS OF WORK TO MATCH. EXISTING UNl[SSOTli[RWIS[DIR[Cl[OIJYTll[CITY
. =
1 ;/rf1AUl��:��1��:i��:=�ES

STREET, INCLUDING ANY SUBGRADE MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED
10 CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL CONSTRUCTION WASTE IN A LEGAL MANNER

FIBERIZED SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
CITY PROJECT DPW 24-24
--,::,. --� ----=::-".·
;;-/

SHEET INDEX

STREET NAME
'IIIIUIMC"I
t.'"11otfl'llln
"""°'11:.a.vtU
�"ll"JMU
CILHI.IIIIUf&�ICI�
IOU• ■,1111111 .I CIM,fll![.U
C01,1IG.�KMWl'f'&��
L..-.,A
·-·
._..__.

V)
SHEETS w ..
.J u
m ..
0 a
0:: a:
..
w � ,_
C w
w
0 "' :I:

V) >-
a: V)
<( a: w 11. � .J
.J ,_
·• w " ;:::
... � 0
> ffi
CD ,_ ii: 0
I
,IL'CO't�CIRJOtrCl�-.U.
'�-----------------------------L_ O_C_A_T_I_O_N_M_ A_P_�_:
________________ __._�_\ �-·-_.:.v_ll.... _____ i,_:.'_..... .t •__ 1_ot_1_0___.

Exhibit A

Page 208 of 520 ends

1.1 Bid.
00 41 43 - BID FORMS

BID FORM
Bids will be received at the City of El Paso de Robles Public Works Administration, 4305 Second Wind Way, Paso Robles, CA 93446, until 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 21, 2025.

NAME OF BIDDER: Papich Construction Company, Inc.

To the Honorable City Council
of the City of El Paso de Robles
4305 Second Wind Way
Paso Robles, California 93446
The undersigned hereby declare that we have carefully examined the location of the proposed Work, and have read and examined the Contract Documents, including all plans, specifications, and all addenda, if any for the following Project:

West Side Fiberized Slurry, DPW 24-24
We hereby propose to furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, and services, and to discharge all duties and obligations necessary and required to perform and complete the Project, as described and in strict conformity with the Drawings, and these Specifications for TOTAL BID PRICE indicated herein.

The undersigned acknowledges receipt, understanding, and full consideration of the following addenda to the Contract Documents:

Addenda No. 1 -- ------------------

1. Attached is the required Bid Guarantee in the amount of not less than 10% of the Total Bid Price.

2. Attached is the completed Designation of Subcontractors form.

3. Attached is the fully executed Noncollusion Declaration form.

4. Attached is the completed Iran Contracting Act Certification form.

5. Attached is the completed Public Works Contractor Registration Certification form.

6. Attached is the completed Contractor's Certificate Regarding Workers' Compensation form.

7. Attached is the completed Bidder Information and Experience form.

8. Site Visit Affidavit

9. Proposed Major Equipment and Material Suppliers

10. Fleet Compliance Certification
82477.07000\31456712.1 -19- 00 41 43 - BID FORMS
Attachment 2

Page 209 of 520 ends

BID FORM

BID SCHEDULE
A. BID SCHEDULE
ITEM BID ITEMS PAYMENT UNIT TOTAL UNIT PRICE *TOTAL COST NO. REFERENCE QUANTITIES 1 Mobilization, Bonds & Insurance TS-1.14 LS 1 �'5VJ bVO 1,q,00� Notifications of Residents, b, 1)/)() b,i)l)O 2 Businesses & Aaencies TS-1.14 LS 1 3 Traffic Control TS-2.06 LS 1 1�1. (i1-t'-t .I ,,- Jir, , iq · ,r;-
Storm Water Pollution Control
4 Proaram TS-3.04 LS 1 IS", ooo / 5, o1Jd
5 Fiberized Slurrv Seal (Tvoe II) TS-8.09 TN 278 '2'1$"'· l;jt) 81.,Jtjq 6 Fiberized Slurrv Seal (Tvoe Ill) TS-8.09 TN 517 21(3, 06 135";�1/ b • 9t:
7 3/8" HMA Tvoe A (PG 64-10) TS-5.05 TN 2,039 ,�, 3o1, &>fq 8 Remove & Reolace 4" HMA TS-6.04 SF 22,000 6-qLf ,�, v8Z> 9 Remove & Reolace 5" HMA TS-6.04 SF 57,500 1,-u?- 3,3. ,(� 10 HMA Conform TS-6.04 SF 1,942 7 ,�.€'�t.)
11 6"
(Allowance)
Deep Lift Stabilization
TS-6.04 SF 1,500 � 7, Q;)D
Type B Keycut (See Plan and
12 Detail) TS-4.04 LF 471 25"' II. 775"
13 Remove & Replace HMA Dike TS-6.04 LF 374 �D If zz.o
14 Remove & Reolace PCC Curb TS-9.04 LF 168 t:t< l5;qt,D Remove & Replace PCC Curb &
15 Gutter TS-9.04 LF 42 1.;o 5, lfliO
16 Construct PCC Cross Gutter TS-9.04 SF 707 lt'l Lf� 071p Prune & Remove Tree Roots \'1.
17 (Under PCC/HMA Reoairs) TS-11.03 SF 2,146 l-2.-.-� 7-6':752 18 Install Rock Erosion Protection TS-12.04 SF 36 l/2. 'it) 2,'2/ib -Z'if'5
19 Lower Manhole Frame & Cover TS-10.03 EA 7 1:z;:2t:fh.. _c;�s Lower Water Valve Frame &
20 Cover TS-10.03 EA 10 Ult) �,q5D
82477.07000\31456712.1 -20- 00 41 43 - BID F,ORMS
Attachment 2

Page 210 of 520 ends

BID FORM
Lower Sewer Cleanout Frame &
21 Cover TS-10.03 EA 3 c,q� '2-,�'b
Lower Survey Monument Frame &
22 Cover TS-10.03 EA 1 IJ 11t; 11q5'
Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to
23 Finish Grade TS-10.03 EA 17 1,()(/0 l�,?>�o
Adjust Water Valve Frame &
24 Cover to Finish Grade TS-10.03 EA 42 t<iiti" �,Cf1D
Adjust Sewer Cleanout Frame &
25 Cover to Finish Grade TS-10.03 EA 4 1i.t:J 3, llfo
Adjust Survey Monument Frame &
26 Cover to Finish Grade TS-10.03 EA 6 ,6 L-1,110
Adjust Gas Valve Frame & Cover
27 to Finish Grade TS-10.03 EA 1 ,�� '��
28 Install Blue RPM @ Fire Hydrant TS-13.05 EA 14 13 I r2- 12" White Crosswalk / Limit Line
29 (Thermo) TS-13.05 LF 658 iti' �Lf1D
30 4" Parkinq Stall Line (Thermo) TS-13.05 LF 456 y.'5V 2,062 White Continental Crosswalk
31 (Thermo) TS-13.05 EA 1 l-/,t,0D l.} (J0l)
Stripping Detail #2 (Thermo &
32 Markers) TS-13.05 LF 1,430 J _ lfj'D 3,5'1)
Stripping Detail #22 (Thermo & (,-'fl> 11
33 Markers) TS-13.05 LF 1,260 1qo
Stripping Detail #38 (Thermo &
34 Markers) TS-13.05 LF 60 ,.?-< 31r;-
35 Install "25" Leaend (Thermo) TS-13.05 EA 2 ii< i: l/SV 36 Install "AHEAD" Leoend (Thermo) TS-13.05 EA 2 4'00 �00 37 Install "DIP" Leqend (Thermo) TS-13.05 EA 1 '2..l/0 -z<.po 38 Install "STOP" Leaend (Thermo) TS-13.05 EA 12 =310 311'2-0 39 Install Arrow Tvoe IV L/R (Thermo) TS-13.05 EA 1 lttS- 1q< Install Pavement Marking "L"
40 Parking Stall Symbol �rr 3&0 (Thermo) TS-13.05 EA 8
41 Parkino
Install Pavement
Stall Svmbol
Marking
(Thermo)
"T"
TS-13.05 EA 21 � 1, / '5.,,--
82477.07000\31456712.1 -21- 00 41 43- BID FORMS
Attachment 2

Page 211 of 520 ends

BID FORM
GRAND TOTAL: __ 6J_l/_1_v1/ _________ _
BIDDER'S SIGNATURE: _ ____,_.::;_-. .......... �-------------------- BIDDER'S COMPANY: Papic Construction Cmpany, Inc.

The costs for any Work shown or required in the Contract Documents, but not specifically identified as a line item are to be included in the related line items and no additional compensation shall be due to Contractor for the performance of the Work.

In case of discrepancy between the Unit Price and the Item Cost set forth for a unit basis item, the unit price shall prevail and shall be utilized as the basis for determining the lowest responsive, responsible Bidder. However, if the amount set forth as a unit price is ambiguous, unintelligible or uncertain for any cause, or is omitted, or is the same amount as the entry in the "Item Cost" column, then the amount set forth in the "Item Cost" column for the item shall prevail and shall be divided by the estimated quantity for the item and the price thus obtained shall be the Unit Price.

For the purpose of evaluating Bids, the City will correct any apparent errors in the extension of unit prices and any apparent errors in the addition of lump sum and extended prices.

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE:

TOTAL BID PRICE BASED ON BID SCHEDULE TOTAL OF UNIT PRICES FOR ITEMS NOS. 1-41 Total Bid Price in Written Form
In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

Page 212 of 520 ends

BID FORM
Upon receipt of the signed contract and other required documents, the contract will be executed by the City, after which the City will prepare a letter giving Contractor Notice to Proceed. The official starting date shall be the date of the Notice to Proceed, unless otherwise specified. The undersigned agrees to begin the Work within ten (10) working days of the date of the Notice to Proceed, unless otherwise specified.

The undersigned has examined the location of the proposed work and is familiar with the Drawings and Specifications and the local conditions at the place where work is to be done.

Enclosed find cash,� or cashier's or certified check No. N / A from the N/A B�unt of 10% , which is not
less than ten percent (10%) of this bid, payable to City of El Paso de Robles as bid security and which is given as a guarantee that the undersigned will enter into a contract and provide the necessary bonds and certificates of insurance if awarded the Work.

Bidder is an individual ___ , or corporation x , or partnership ___ , organized under the laws of the State of --California ------------
Bidder confirms license(s) required by California State Contractor's License Law for the performance of the subject project are in full effect and proper order. The following are the Bidder's applicable license number(s), with their expiration date(s) and class of license(s):
767055, A, HAZ
Ex . 7 31 26
If the Bidder is a joint venture, each member of the joint venture must include the required licensing information.

Sureties that will furnish the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Payment Bond, in the form specified herein, in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price within fifteen ( 15) calendar days from the date the City provides the successful bidder the Notice of Award. Sureties must meet all of the State of California bonding requirements, as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120 and must be authorized by the State of California.

Page 213 of 520 ends

BID FORM
discretion of the City, the City may waive the Financial Strength Rating and the Financial Size Category classifications for Workers' Compensation insurance. (signatures continued on next page)
82477.07000\31456712.1 -24- 00 41 43- BID FORMS
Attachment 2

Page 214 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: David LaCaro, Public Works Operations Manager
Subject: Approval of a Resolution Waiving Minor Bidding Irregularities and Awarding a Contract to Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc. for the Satellite Drainage Rehabilitation Project The City has determined that the project will not result in any significant environmental impacts. In compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code, a Notice of Determination (NOD) was filed on September 17, 2024. A Negative Declaration was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and circulated for public and state agency review. The public comment period concluded on October 15, 2024, and the state agency review period ended on October 30, 2024. No comments were received regarding the project.

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

1. Since 2005, the City has been regulated under the Statewide General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (Stormwater General Permit). In accordance with the permit, City staff conducts annual maintenance on high-priority drainage systems within City limits. During these routine activities, staff identified significant damage to the Satellite Drainage channel—damage that far exceeds the scope of regular maintenance.

2. Satellite Drainage is located along the northwest boundary of the Paso Robles Airport and flows north from Wing Way toward the Estrella River. The damaged section spans approximately 180 linear feet adjacent to the Coast Southwest Surfactants chemical facility.

3. On October 12, 2022, the City contracted with Diversified Project Services International, Inc. (DPSI) to develop 100% construction plans, technical specifications, and engineering cost estimates for the Satellite Drainage Rehabilitation Project. Because the project involves work within a natural waterway, environmental permits were required before construction could proceed. The City received the final design documents from DPSI on July 18, 2025.

4. To comply with regulatory requirements for work within a natural drainage channel, the City successfully secured all necessary environmental permits for the Satellite Drainage Rehabilitation Project. These include:
a. Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, received on July 17, 2025;
b. Nationwide Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, received on July 21, 2025; and c. Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, received on July 23, 2025.

5. On September 17, 2024, the City filed a Notice of Determination (NOD) in accordance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. The NOD confirmed that the project would not result in any significant environmental impacts and that a Negative Declaration was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The public review period concluded on October 15, 2024, followed by the close of the state agency review period on October 30, 2024.

Page 215 of 520 ends

6. Staff advertised a Notice Inviting Bids for the project on July 24, 2025 and opened bids on August 28, 2025. The following bids were received:

Contractor Name Bid Amount
Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc. $199,252.45
R. Burke Corporation $234,837.40
Anderw Brown General Engineering $236,491.00
Hartzell General Engineering $252,864.07
Bruce Keis $257,446.32
Rob Reynolds Construction $346,849.39

7. The City found that Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc. was the lowest responsive and responsible bidder in the amount of $199,252.45. However, during staff’s review of the bid submitted by Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc., a minor irregularity was identified. The issue was corrected in accordance with the bid instructions, is considered immaterial in nature, and does not affect the integrity of the competitive bidding process or otherwise confer a competitive advantage to Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc. In accordance with the City’s bid documents and applicable legal standards, staff recommends waiving thisimmaterial irregularity and proceeding with contract award to Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Award a contract for the Satellite Drainage Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $199,252.45 to Dave Spurr Excavation, Inc.; or

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
In accordance with the Statewide Stormwater General Permit, the City is required to perform annual maintenance on priority drainage systems within its jurisdiction. During routine inspections, staff identified significant damage to the Satellite Drainage channel, primarily caused by recent high-intensity storm events. These storms produced excessive water velocity, resulting in severe scouring and bank erosion. The extent of the damage exceeds the scope of routine maintenance and necessitates a full rehabilitation effort.

Satellite Drainage runs directly behind the Coast Southwest Surfactants chemical facility, where the erosion has become critically severe. The channel bank has eroded to within two feet of the foundation supporting a process wastewater tank. This tank serves as a secondary containment system for processed wash water generated during surfactant production. Continued degradation poses a substantial threat to private infrastructure and carries the risk of an environmental catastrophe should the tank become undermined or fail. In the event of a severe storm before repairs are complete, uncontrolled discharge of contaminated water could reach the Salinas River, resulting in widespread ecological damage, regulatory violations, and liability exposure for both the City and the facility operator.

Recognizing these risks, the City has moved expeditiously to initiate corrective measures. Diversified Project Services International, Inc. (DPSI) was retained to prepare full construction plans, technical specifications, and engineering estimates for the rehabilitation of the drainage channel. The proposed improvements include recontouring the drainageway, reconstructing and stabilizing the eroded bank, installing rock slope protection (RSP) along the banks and channel, and constructing multiple check dam structures to reduce water velocity and minimize future erosion. Restoration efforts will also include

Page 216 of 520 ends

hydroseeding of disturbed areas and the planting of willow stakes to enhance long-term ecological health and stabilize the channel.

The permitting process required extensive coordination and took nearly one year to complete. Securing these permits ensures that construction activities comply with state and federal environmental protection standards. Permit conditions include specific measures to safeguard water quality, protect existing habitat, and implement restoration elements that will benefit the ecosystem once construction is complete. Notably, the City is required to conduct a three-year mitigation monitoring program to verify that installed vegetation establishes successfully and provides habitat value for native wildlife. This longterm commitment not only fulfills regulatory obligations but also enhances the ecological function of the drainageway.

The project is critical to prevent further erosion, protect adjacent infrastructure, and avoid a potential environmental release to the Salinas River. The need for repairs stems from major storm events that generated high water velocities, leading to severe bank erosion. The proposed improvements aim to restore drainage functionality, reduce water velocity, and protect the adjacent roadway, private property, and critical infrastructure. Moving forward will not only stabilize and restore the channel but also ensure compliance with environmental permits and provide long-term habitat improvements.

Fiscal Impact
The total cost to complete the Satellite Drainage Rehabilitation Project is $199,252.45. The City’s Capital Improvement Program budget included this project since FY 2022-23 and as such, no further actions are needed.

CEQA
The City finds that this project will not have any significant effects on the environment. The City filed a Notice of Determination (NOD), on September 17, 2024, in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resource Code. A Negative Declaration was prepared pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and was circulated for public and state agency review. Final review for the public ended on October 15, 2024, and ended for state agencies on October 30, 2024. No comments about this project were received.

Recommendation
Approve Resolution 25-XXX, awarding a contract for the Satellite Drainage Rehabilitation Project to Dave Spurr Excavating, inc. in the amount of $199, 252.45 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract subject to any minor, technical or non-substantive changes as approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

Attachments

1. Resolution 25-XXX – Satellite Drainage Rehabilitation Project

2. Bid – Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc.

Page 217 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE SATELLITE DRAINAGE REHABILITATION PROJECT TO DAVE SPURR EXCAVATION, INC.

WHEREAS, the City is regulated by the Statewide Stormwater General Permit and is required to conduct annual maintenance activities on high maintenance drainages within City limits; and WHEREAS, the Satellite Drainage channel sustained significant damage due to major storm events that generated high water velocities, leading to severe bank erosion and the proposed improvements aim to restore drainage functionality, reduce water velocity, and protect the adjacent roadway, private property, and critical infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, on October 12, 2022, the City contracted with Diversified Project Services International, Inc. (DPSI) to develop 100% construction plans, technical specifications for the rehabilitation of Satellite Drainage; and
WHEREAS, prior to initiating construction, the City secured all required environmental permits from the necessary resource agencies due to the project’s location within a regulated waterway; and WHEREAS, on September 17, 2024, the City filed a Notice of Determination (NOD) in accordance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code confirming that the project would not result in any significant environmental impacts and that a Negative Declaration was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the City advertised a Notice Inviting Bids on July 24, 2025 and opened bids on August 8, 2025 where a total of six bids were received ranging from $199,252.45 to $346,849.39; and WHEREAS, it was determined that Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid; and
WHEREAS, a minor irregularity identified in the bid is immaterial in nature, was corrected in accordance with the bidding instructions, and does not affect the integrity of the competitive bidding process; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds have been allocated in the adopted budget, and no further action is required.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council hereby waives all immaterial irregularities identified in the bid and finds that the immaterial irregularity did not affect the integrity of the competitive bidding process.

The irregularity was corrected in accordance with the bidding instructions.

Section 3. Authorizes the City Manager to enter into a contract with Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc. in an amount not to exceed 199,252.45, for the implementation of the Satellite Drainage

Page 218 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
Rehabilitation Project and authorize the City manager and City Attorney to make any minor alterations to the agreement that are consistent with the Council action Section 4. The City has complied with all of the provisions related to CEQA and finds that this project will not have any effects on the environment. The City filed a Notice of Determination (NOD), on September 17, 2024, in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resource Code.

A Negative Declaration was prepared pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and was circulated for public and state agency review. Final review for the public ended on October 15, 2024, and ended for state agencies on October 30, 2024. No comments about this project were received.

APPROVED this 16th day of September 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Martin, City Clerk

Page 219 of 520 ends

Attachment 2

Page 220 of 520 ends

Attachment 2

Page 221 of 520 ends

Attachment 2

Page 222 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: Darren Nash, City Planner
Subject: Approval of an Oak Tree Removal at 1511 Vine Street (OTR25-08, P25-0078) CEQA Determination: Staff recommends the City Council approve a Resolution thereby approving the removal of one valley oak located at 1511 Vine Street (OTR25-08, P25- 0078) and finding the project exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section15304.

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

1. The City received an application filed by Vicki Silva, property owner, requesting the removal of one 44-inch diameter Valley Oak (“the project”) on a developed lot at 1511 Vine Street (APN 008-318- 013)(See Attachment No. 1, Vicinity Map for further detail.)

2. Certified arborist, Kelly Koker evaluated the oak tree on the property and provided an evaluation of the tree’s health. The Arborist recommended the tree be removed (Attachment 2).

3. Paso Robles Municipal Code 10.01.050.A requires any person wishing to remove one or more oak trees to apply in writing to the Community Development Department for a permit.

4. Paso Robles Municipal Code 10.01.050.D.1 requires the Director of Community Development to prepare a report for the City Council’s consideration of, among other things, “The condition of the oak tree with respect to health, status of public nuisance, danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures, interference with utility services, and its status as host for a plant, pest or disease endangering other species of trees or plants with infection of infestation”.

5. For the reasons further described herein, the Director of Community Development is recommending that the City Council approve Oak Tree Removal Permit OTR 25-08, based on a finding that the condition of the oak trees with respect to their general health, danger of falling, and proximity to existing or proposed structures justify the removal of the oak tree located on 1511 Vine Street, and, impose oak tree mitigation measures, as further described in the attached Resolution.

6. Removal of the 44-inch oak tree could require the replanting of as many as seven (7) 1.5-inch diameter mitigation trees, however, as a result of the tree decline not being the fault of the property owner, that the property has limited area to plant new trees, and since no construction is associated with this removal request, planting one 15 gallon valley oak tree on site is reasonable.

7. The proposed project to remove one 44-inch diameter valley oak is exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15304 – Class 4, Minor Alterations to Land. .

Options

1. Take no action; or

2. Approve the Oak Tree Removal Permit OTR 25-08, based on a finding that the condition of the oak trees with respect to their general health, danger of falling, and proximity to existing or proposed structures justify the removal of the oak tree and require the planting of one 15-gallong valley oak tree on site; or

Page 223 of 520 ends

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
The Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance requires staff to consider five factors when making a recommendation to City Council for oak tree removal permits. The factors are listed below with an explanation for how each was considered in staff’s recommendation in italics:

1. The condition of the oak tree with respect to its general health, status as a public nuisance, danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures, interference with utility services, and its status as host for a plant, pest or disease endangering other species of trees or plants with infection or infestation;
The project arborist has provided an arborist report that indicates that the tree is in poor condition, as a result of the tree having low vigor, the tree being situated against the house, compacted soil in the Critical Root Zone (CRZ) of the tree, and an unbalanced and sparse crown. The tree has recent and past limb failures. A beehive is located in the tree. The arborist rates the tree as a 2 or 3, indicating it is in fair to poor condition and recommends the tree be removed.

2. The necessity of the requested action to allow construction of improvements or otherwise allow reasonable use of the property for the purpose for which it has been zoned. In this context, it shall be the burden of the person seeking the permit to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the director that there are no reasonable alternatives to the proposed design and use of the property. Every reasonable effort shall he made to avoid impacting oak trees, including but not limited to use of custom building design and incurring extraordinary costs to save oak trees; There is no construction proposed for this property. The request for removal is to prevent additional limb failures.

3. The topography of land, and the potential effect of the requested tree removal on soil retention, water retention, and diversion or increased flow of surface waters. The director shall consider how either the preservation or removal of the oak tree(s) would relate to grading and drainage.

Except as specifically authorized by the planning commission and city council, ravines, stream beds and other natural water-courses that provide a habitat for oak trees shall not be disturbed; The subject oak does not contribute to an intact habitat and is not in proximity to significant flow of surface waters.

4. The number, species, size and location of existing trees in the area and the effect of the requested action on shade areas, air pollution, historic values, scenic beauty and the general welfare of the city as a whole;
The tree provides shade and beauty, and contributes to the historic value of the property and the downtown. The applicant will be required to replant 1 oak tree.

5. Good forestry practices such as, but not limited to, the number of healthy trees the subject parcel of land will support.

Removal of the 44-inch oak tree could require the replanting of as many as seven (7) 1.5-inch diameter mitigation trees, however, as a result of the tree decline not being the fault of the property owner, that the property has limited area to plant new trees, and since no construction is associated with this removal request, planting one 15 gallon valley oak tree on site is reasonable.

Page 224 of 520 ends

When considering all required factors, due to the overall health of the tree and its proximity to proposed structures, staff finds the removal is justified given the information provided.

Subject 44-inch Valley Oak
Fiscal Impact
There is no direct fiscal impact on the City from this action.

CEQA
Staff recommends that pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council determine that this proposal to remove the 44-inch live oak tree is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines Section 15304 – Class 4, Minor Alterations to Land, which consist of minor private alterations in the condition of land and/or vegetation which do not involve the removal of a healthy, mature, scenic trees. Here, the proposed project involves the removal of one oak tree that is structurally compromised and poses a hazard due to its condition and proximity to existing structures. Moreover, the tree removal process is limited to the removal of one oak tree in poor health and is thus a minor private alteration. There is no evidence of any unusual or special conditions that would result in a significant effect on the environment.

Lastly, none of the exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption identified in State CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. The project site does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas. There is no potential for cumulative impacts; there are no unusual circumstances that would have a significant impact on the environment; the actions would not negatively impact scenic resources within a duly designated scenic highway; there is no record of hazardous waste.

Page 225 of 520 ends

Recommendation
Approve Resolution 25-XXX, authorizing the oak tree removal (permit OTR25-08) based on a finding that the condition of the oak tree with respect to its general health, danger of falling, and proximity to existing or proposed structures justify the removal of the oak tree and require one 15-gallon valley oak mitigation tree to be planted on site.

Attachments

1. Vicinity Map

2. Vicki Silva Email

3. Resolution 25-XXX - Authorizing the Removal of One Valley Oak Tree a. Exhibit A – Arborist Report

Page 226 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
SITE

Page 227 of 520 ends

Page 228 of 520 ends

Attachment 3
RESOLUTION 25-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

AUTHORIZING THE REMOVAL OF ONE VALLEY OAK TREE AT
1511 VINE STREET - APN 008-318-013
WHEREAS, the City received an application for Oak Tree Removal Permit OTR25-08 (P25-0078). The request is to remove one 44-inch valley oak tree; and
WHEREAS, certified arborist, Kelly Koker, evaluated the oak tree on the property and provided an arborist report indicating that the tree is in poor health and has had recent limb failures; and WHEREAS, Paso Robles Municipal Code 10.01.050.D.1 requires the consideration of “The condition of the oak tree with respect to its general health, status as a public nuisance, danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures, interference with utility services, and its status as host for a plant, pest or disease endangering other species of trees or plants with infection or infestation,” among other considerations; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends approval of oak tree removal permit based on the arborist evaluating the tree and determining that the tree is in poor health and removal is necessary to prevent additional limbs from falling; and
WHEREAS, removal of the 44-inch oak tree could require the replanting of as many as seven (7) 1.5- inch diameter mitigation trees, however, as a result of the tree decline not being the fault of the property owner, that the property has limited area to plant new trees, and since no construction is associated with this removal request, planting one (1) 15 gallon valley oak tree on site is reasonable; and
WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 4 exemption for Minor Alterations to Land, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15304; and
WHEREAS, the City Council met to discuss the request for an oak tree removal on September 16, 2025, considered the facts as presented in the staff report prepared for this project, and accepted public testimony.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Pursuant to Paso Robles Municipal Code section 10.01.050.D., based on the information contained in the staff report, testimony received, and responses thereto, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the 44-inch diameter valley oak tree located at 1511 Vine Street, is in poor condition and poses a public hazard; and

Page 229 of 520 ends

Attachment 3
Section 3. The City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles does hereby impose the following oak tree mitigation measures:

1. Approve the request to remove one (1) 44-inch diameter valley oak tree as shown in Exhibit A;

2. Require the onsite replanting of at least one (1) 15 gallon, 1.5-inch caliper valley oak trees at the direction of a certified arborist.

3. Require the provision of irrigation and protection for the replanted oak tree until it is established.

Section 4. The City Council finds that pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council determine that this proposal to remove the 44-inch live oak tree at 1511 Vine Street is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines Section 15304 – Class 4, Minor Alterations to Land, which consist of minor private alterations in the condition of land and/or vegetation which do not involve the removal of a healthy, mature, scenic trees. Here, the proposed project involves the removal of one oak tree that is structurally compromised and poses a hazard due to its condition and proximity to existing structures. Moreover, the tree removal process is limited to the removal of one oak tree in poor health and is thus a minor private alteration. There is no evidence of any unusual or special conditions that would result in a significant effect on the environment.

APPROVED this 16th Day of September, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Martin, City Clerk
Exhibit A - Arborist Report

Page 230 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles July 24, 2025
Address : Vicki Silva
1511 Vine St. Paso Robles, CA 93446
Arborist Report for Tree Removal
This arborist report is for one Valley Oak ( Quercus lobata ) tree being requested for removal. The tree is located at 1511 Vine Street in Paso Robles in the back yard on the corner of the house. The tree is marked with a pink flagging ribbon for easy identification.

Reason For Removal Request :
( from homeowner )
The homeowner is concerned with the recent limb failure that more limbs may fail and fall onto the house or neighboring property. Concerns are for damage to property but also the liability that a limb may fall and severely injure a person or worse.

Terms you may see in this report :

CRZ - Critical Root Zone - This is where the sensitive roots of the tree exist. The “ Critical Root Zone “ (CRZ) means an area that is within a circle circumscribed around the trunk of a tree using a radius of 1 foot per inch DBH.

Example of CRZ - a 20 inch diameter at breast height tree will have a CRZ with a radius of 20 feet.

Dripline - The dripline is the area directly located under the outer circumference of the tree branches / canopy.

DBH - Diameter at breast height, normally about 4 ft 6 inches from ground.

Vigor - Overall health of tree
Branch Collar - area where the branch joins another branch or trunk.

Canopy - collective branches and foliage of a tree or group of trees’ crowns.

Crown - upper part of a tree, consisting of the branches and foliage.

Cavity - Open or closed hollow area within the tree, this is usually associated with decay.

Foliage - leaves of a plant
Root Collar - area where the main roots join the trunk or main stem of the plant. Usually at or near ground level.
1 Exhibit A

Page 231 of 520 ends

Codominant Stems - forked stems nearly the same size in diameter, arising from a common junction that lacks a normal branch union.

Included Bark - bark that becomes embedded in a crotch between branch and trunk or between codominant stems . Causes a weak structure.

Absorbing Roots - A tree's absorbing roots are within the top 12 inches of soil. These are fine fibrous roots that take up water and minerals.

Scarification - to break up the surface of topsoil or pavement.

Tree Protection Zone - described as the area within the orange tree protection fencing.

Shall - Word that designates a mandatory requirement.

Should - Word that designates an advisory recommendation.

Brown Rot - Wood-decay fungus, fungi that digest moist wood, causing rot, includes various species that infect living trees and cured wood.

Porous - material that allows water from precipitation to pass through, yet are strong and durable enough to support vehicular or pedestrian traffic.

Epicormic shoot - shoot arising from a dormant bud or newly formed adventitious tissue.

Evergreen - a tree has its leaves all year round
Deciduous - tree loses its leaves annually
Tree Information:

Valley Oaks ( Quercus lobata ) - Deciduous - Native
● Construction tolerance - Moderate
● Size - 60 to 100 ft tall , 50 ft wide
● Growth Rate - Fast , Moderate
● Sun - Full sun
● Moisture - Low, summer irrigation max 2x per month if needed ● Soil PH - 6.0 to 8.0
Tree #170 -
Tree tag # : 170
Tree Species : Valley Oak ( Quercus lobata )
Truck Circumference : 11 ft 6 in
Diameter at Breast Height ( DBH) : 43.9 in
Height : 70 ft
Crown Spread : 60 ft N - S Direction
65 ft W - E Direction
Tree Health Rating : 2 / 3 - poor / fair ( see below for description of rating system )
This tree is rated poor based on a visual inspection on July 22, 2025. The vigor of the tree is low. The tree is located on flat topography. This tree's location is in the back yard right as you enter the gate. The house and deck are placed
directly next to the trunk. The soil around the critical root zone is compacted. There is a deck covering about ⅓ of the CRZ, about ⅓ covered by the 2 Exhibit A

Page 232 of 520 ends

house and the other ⅓ being the yard, a board fence and neighboring property. The crown is large in size and sparse looking. The crown is unbalanced by about 20%. There is a dead spar along with one broken hanger in the canopy. The tree recently lost a large limb, breaking where a small cavity was and rot / decay was present. This cavity was most likely a wood pecker hole that decayed over time. There are multiple wood pecker holes and small cavities throughout the canopy on branches. When comparing the leaf color to nearby Valley Oaks, the color is less vibrant and density is sparse when compared to other Valley Oaks nearby. There are some branches that are codominants with included bark. When inspecting the canopy, a bee hive was also discovered. Bees will use hollowed out and decayed areas in limbs to create their hives.

Previous Pruning / Failure History : Was not able to get the last information on when the tree was last trimmed, however the tree did recently lose a large limb. While on site, I reached out to the neighbor on the corner, who also stated that a large limb from this tree failed and broke onto her house. The exact date was not given for this limb failure.

Hazards : If a tree should fail, it would fall onto the house and the neighboring house.

Preservation : While preservation is always our goal, trimming would be the recommended preservation technique to reduce weight on the limbs. Due to the sparse canopy and the size, trimming more than 25% of the live canopy would be the only feasible way to actually reduce the risk and weight in the canopy. This is not advisable and is not healthy for the tree to remove more than 25% of the canopy. It is not recommended to trim this tree any further as it would be unhealthy to remove any more live canopy.

Due to the amount of cavities, and past limb failures being at these cavities ( wood pecker holes ), there is concern that these cavities are rotted and decayed leaving the limbs compromised.

Tree Rating :
1 2 3 4
Tree No. Tree Species Trunk DBH Tree Condition
170 Valley Oak 43.9 in 2 / 3
1 = Tree Number - ( only one tree in this report ) 3 = Trunk Diameter at breast height - approx. 4 ft 6 inches 2 = Tree species - Abbreviation of common name of tree 4 = Tree Condition - 1 = poor / 10 = excellent Tree Rating System -
A rating System of 1 - 10 was used for visually establishing the overall condition of the trees.

The trees are rated based on certain factors, including but not limited to the tree's vigor, pests , growth, conks, cavities, splits, bark appearance, past failures, pruning scars, etc. The rating system is defined as follows:

Rating Condition
0 Deceased
1 Very Poor - Evidence of massive past failures, extreme 3 Exhibit A

Page 233 of 520 ends

disease and or is in severe decline.
2 Poor - May be saved with attention to any of the following - Pruning, insect/pest eradication and future monitoring
3 Fair - Some past failures, some pests or structural defects that may be mitigated with pruning.
4 Fair - May have had minor past failures, deadwood, minor Structural defects, some pests
5 Good - Relatively healthy tree with little structural and or pest defects
6 Good - Healthy tree that probably can be left in it natural state
7 - 9 Very Good - Ratings reserved for trees that have had proper arboricultural pruning and attention or have no
apparent structural defects
10 Excellent - Healthy tree with excellent structure and foliage. No signs of problems and has had proper care.

Possible Mitigation for Removed Trees :
*The following is from the City of Paso Robles Municipal Code ; Chapter 10.1 Oak Tree preservation , Section E
In conjunction with the intended decision made on an application for a permit, the director shall attach or recommend for city council consideration reasonable conditions to ensure compliance with the stated purposes of this chapter, and a condition requiring replacement oaks being equivalent to twenty five percent of the diameter of the removed tree(s). (For example, the replacement requirement for removal of two trees of fifteen-inch DBH (thirty total diameter inches), would be seven and one-half inches (thirty inches removed multiplied by twenty-five hundredths replacement factor). This requirement could be satisfied by planting five, one and one-half inch caliper trees, or three, two and one-half inch caliper trees, or any other combination totaling seven and one-half inches). A minimum of two, twenty four inch box, one and one-half inch minimum trunk caliper measurement trees shall be required for each oak tree removed. Replacement trees shall be located on the same property as where the tree is approved for removal or, subject to approval of the director, arrangements can be made to locate the replacement trees on public property.

Removal Application Fee - $600 ( subject to change without notice ) Replanting Plan :

Client is asking that if replanting mitigation be required, that these plantings take place off-site or an in-lieu of fee be set. Due to the property layout and size, clients are requesting if in lieu of fee or off site planting to be accepted.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. 4 Exhibit A

Page 234 of 520 ends

Kelly Koker
ISA Certified Arborist®
WE - 11968A
[email protected]
P : 805-423-8511
Location of property where the tree is located : 1511 Vine St. Paso Robles, CA 93446 5 Exhibit A

Page 235 of 520 ends

(picture courtesy of Google Earth )
6 Exhibit A

Page 236 of 520 ends

↑ both images above show where the bee hive is located. 7 Exhibit A

Page 237 of 520 ends

← Orange arrow shows a codominant branch
union with included bark
8 Exhibit A

Page 238 of 520 ends

Above images show the recent limb failure. A small cavity created by a woodpecker developed rot, creating a weak spot in the limb. This limb failed and broke due to the integrity of the limb being compromised from the cavity and rot.
9 Exhibit A

Page 239 of 520 ends

Above pictures on this page show how close the house and deck are to the trunk of the tree. 10 Exhibit A

Page 240 of 520 ends

Images on this page are of old limbs that were
removed and the wounds that are rotten. Showing signs of decay in the old wounds. 11 Exhibit A

Page 241 of 520 ends

↑ This image shows another small cavity most likely created by a wood pecker. This cavity is similar to the cavity that was present on the limb that recently failed. 12 Exhibit A

Page 242 of 520 ends

The sparse canopy shown
Tree shown from looking at property from Vine
St.
13 Exhibit A

Page 243 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: Leslie Frazier, City Engineer/Deputy Community Development Director Subject: Approval to Amend Resolution No. 21-002 Modifying Authorization of Easement Acceptance on Behalf of the City Council
CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

1. On January 19, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-002 authorizing the City Manager to accept easements after review by the City Engineer (or Capital Project Engineer) and City Attorney.

2. Under the resolution, easements can be accepted by the City Manager unless they create a significant maintenance burden or require City funds to acquire.

3. As part of the on-going development within the City, temporary and permanent easements to implement master planned roads, water and sewer systems are required. The easements include right of way, slope, sewer, water, trail, slope maintenance and pedestrian access.

4. The easement acceptance process takes time and can delay a private project from obtaining permits and a certificate of occupancy. In addition, formal easement acceptance uses valuable staff time for staff report preparation.

5. To expedite easement acceptance, City staff is proposing an amendment to Resolution No. 21-002 to expand the City Manager’s authorization to accept easements that require City funds to acquire up to an amount equal to the City Manager’s spending authority.

6. Currently, the City’s Purchasing Policy and Procedures states that the City Council concurrence is required for purchases greater than $100,000.

7. Under the amended Resolution, easements that create a significant maintenance burden or requires City funds to acquire above the City Manager’s spending authority would be brought to City Council for formal acceptance.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Amend Resolution No. 21-002 expanding the City Manager’s authorization, or his authorized designee, to accept easements that require City funds to acquire, up to an amount equal to the City Manager’s spending authority; or

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Page 244 of 520 ends

Analysis and Conclusions
City staff is seeking Council approval to amend Resolution No. 21-002 to delegate additional easement acceptance authority to the City Manager or their authorized designee for easements requiring City funds, provided the cost does not exceed the City Manager’s current spending authority.

Under the current resolution, only easements that are donated or involve no fiscal consideration can be accepted administratively by the City Manager. However, in practice, most easements offered to the City require some form of fiscal considerations to acquire, whether for permanent property rights, temporary construction access, or infrastructure placement. As a result, the well-intended original resolution is often not applicable in the majority of real-world cases, which must still be brought to the City Council for acceptance. This can result in procedural inefficiencies and delays in delivering time-sensitive public improvements, issues the original resolution was intended to resolve.

Easements are a critical component of implementing Council-approved plans such as the City’s Circulation Element, Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, and Water and Wastewater Master Plans. They are commonly required for projects including road widening, sidewalk gaps, utility installations, drainage improvements, and public infrastructure related to new development. Even minor easements, such as a sidewalk behind a driveway or a small sliver of right-of-way, can be subject to delay if Council action is required for acceptance.

A Grant of Easement provides the City with the legal right, either temporary or perpetual, to access or use private property for public benefit. These easements are typically needed to move projects forward efficiently and in alignment with the City's long-term infrastructure goals.

To reduce delays and improve project delivery timelines, staff recommends amending the resolution to authorize the City Manager (or designee) to accept easements requiring payment or other consideration, provided the cost does not exceed their existing spending authority. Examples of eligible easements include:
 Right-of-way dedications for new or widened roads that support the City’s circulation system  Right-of-way easements to complete existing street segments  Pedestrian and equestrian easements identified in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan  Temporary Construction Easements for public infrastructure projects  Access easements for maintenance of City-owned facilities  Utility easements for water, wastewater, recycled water, and communications infrastructure  Avigation easements supporting Airport operations
 Drainage and stormwater infrastructure easements
 Parking easements that do not create new maintenance responsibilities  Easements required as part of a Planning Commission or Council-approved development project Easements that exceed the City Manager’s spending authority or impose significant ongoing maintenance costs would continue to require City Council approval.

Delegating additional easement acceptance authority will result in more efficient project delivery, reduced administrative workload, and faster implementation of public improvements. By addressing a procedural gap in the original resolution, namely, its inapplicability to most easements that involve consideration, this update will better align the City’s practices with real-world project needs. Ultimately, this change will accelerate the construction of public infrastructure that directly benefits residents, businesses, and the broader community.

Page 245 of 520 ends

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact resulting from the acceptance of most easements. Some maintenance costs are associated with the improvements existing or constructed in the easements; however, these costs are already planned for as part of the City’s master plans for transportation and utilities. Easements that present new maintenance burdens or must be purchased in an amount above the City Manager’s spending authority, will be brought individually to Council for review.

CEQA
The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Recommendation (Option 2)
Approve Resolution 25-XXX, amending Resolution 21-002 to expand the City Manager’s authorization or his authorized designee, to accept easements that require City funds to acquire, up to an amount equal to the City Manager’s spending authority.

Attachments

1. Resolution 25-XXX – Amending Resolution 21-002 to Expanding Authorization of Easement Acceptance
a. Exhibit A - Grant of Easement Acceptance
b. Exhibit B - Resolution 21-002

Page 246 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 21-002 TO EXPAND AUTHORIZATION OF

EASEMENT ACCEPTANCE
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-002 authorizing the City Manager to accept easements after review by the City Engineer or Capital Project Engineer and City Attorney; and
WHEREAS, under Resolution No. 21-002, easements can be accepted by the City Manager unless they create a significant maintenance burden or require City funds to acquire; and WHEREAS, the widening of roads and installation of utilities often requires easements from landowners to ensure orderly development; and
WHEREAS, the City also acquires temporary and permanent easements in order to implement master planned roads, water, and sewer systems; and
WHEREAS, currently all proposed City easements that require City funds to acquire are presented to Council for acceptance; and
WHEREAS, easement presented to Council include right of way, slope,sewer and water, trail, slope planting and pedestrian access; and
WHEREAS, the easement acceptance process takes time and can delay a project from obtaining permits, certificates of occupancy and use valuable staff time for report preparation; and WHEREAS, City staff is proposing an amendment to Resolution No. 21-002 to expand the City Manager’s authorization to accept easements that require City funds to acquire, up to an amount equal to the City Manager’s spending authority; and
WHEREAS, easements that create a significant maintenance burden or requires City funds to acquire above the City Manager’s spending authority would be brought to Council for acceptance.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Section 3. The City Council finds that the following easements can be accepted by the City Manager or his authorized designee:

Page 247 of 520 ends

Attachment 1
 Right of way dedications for roads or road widening for the planned buildout of the City circulation system.
 Right of way easements to complete existing roads.
 Pedestrian access and equestrian access easements that are included in the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.
 Temporary Construction Easements for City projects.
 Easements for maintenance of City facilities.
 City utility system easements including, but not limited to water, wastewater, communications, and recycled water.
 Avigation easements (to support Airport operations).
 Drainage easements.
 Parking easements without a new maintenance burden.
 Easements required as part of a Planning Commission or Council approved development project.

Section 4. The City Manager may sign the easement acceptance on the City Council’s behalf, after review by the City Attorney and City Engineer or Capital Project Engineer, for the qualifying list of easements within Section 2, above. All other easements, including easements that create a significant maintenance burden or requires City funds to acquire above the City Manager’s spending authority, would still be brought forward for City Council acceptance.

Section 5. The City Manager or his authorized designee will include the attached Exhibit A – Grant of Easement Acceptance with each signed easement for recordation.

APPROVED by the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles by the following vote on September 16, 2025.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Martin, City Clerk
Exhibit A – Grant of Easement Acceptance
Exhibit B – Resolution 21-002

Page 248 of 520 ends

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

CITY ENGINEER

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
1000 SPRING STREET
PASO ROBLES, CA 93446
Space above this line reserved for the Recorder’s Office

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER TO DEDICATE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Grant of Easement or Dedication from ______________________________________ , to the City of Paso Robles, a municipal corporation of the State of California and/or government agency is hereby accepted by Resolution 25-XXX, adopted by the City Council on MONTH DATE YEAR, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

By: ____ Dated
Chris Huot, City Manager
ATTEST:

Melissa Martin, City Clerk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of _CALIFORNIA _________ _
ss.

County of _SAN LUIS OBISPO_______
On _______________________, before me, _______________________________________________, (here insert name and title of the officer)

personally appeared ________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacities, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness my hand and official seal.

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

Chris Huot, City Manager
Exhibit A

Page 249 of 520 ends

Signature ___________________________________ (Seal)

Page 250 of 520 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 21-002

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT GRANT OF EASEMENTS TO THE CITY

MANAGER OR HIS OR HER AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE
WHEREAS, the widening of roads and installation of utilities often requires easements from landowners to ensure orderly development; and
WHEREAS, the City also acquires temporary and permanent easements in order to implement master planned roads, water, and sewer systems; and
WHEREAS, currently all proposed City easements are presented to Council for acceptance; and WHEREAS, easement presented to Council include right of way, slope, sewer and water, trail, slope planting and pedestrian access; and
WHEREAS, the easement acceptance process takes time and can delay a project from obtaining permits, certificates of occupancy and use valuable staff time for report preparation; and WHEREAS, California Government Code section 27281 provides that a governmental agency may authorize one or more of its officers or agents to accept and consent to deeds or grants conveying an interest in or easement upon real estate for public purposes; and WHEREAS, delegation speeds projects, increases available staff time, and streamlines the easement acceptance process; and
WHEREAS, City staff is proposing the easements be accepted by the City Manager after review by the City Engineer or Capital Project Engineer and City Attorney.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council finds that the following easements can be accepted by the City Manager or his or her authorized designee:
• Right of way dedications or easements for roads or road widening for the planned buildout of the City circulation system
• Right of way easements to complete existing roads as part of private development projects. • Pedestrian access, equestrian and other access easements that are included in the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.
• Temporary Construction Easements for City projects.
• Easements for Maintenance of City facilities.
• City utility system easements including but not limited to water, wastewater, communications, and recycled water.
• Avigation easements.
• Drainage easements.

CC Resolution 21-002 Page 1 of 4 Exhibit B

Page 251 of 520 ends

Exhibit B

Page 252 of 520 ends

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

CITY ENGINEER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
1000 SPRING STREET
PASO ROBLES, CA 93446
Space above this line reserved for the Recorder’s Office

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
Pursuant to
California Government Code Section 27281
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the grant deed dated _____________, 20____, from to the City of El Paso de Robles, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the City of El Paso de Robles, pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution No. ____, adopted by the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles on ___________________, and the City of El Paso de Robles consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

Date: CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
By: ______________________________
Its: ______________________________
ATTEST:
___________________
City Clerk
CC Resolution 21-002 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit B Exhibit A

Page 253 of 520 ends

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of _CALIFORNIA _________ _
ss.

County of _SAN LUIS OBISPO_______
On _______________________, before me, _______________________________________________, (here insert name and title of the officer)

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness my hand and official seal.

Signature ___________________________________ (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

Thomas Frutchey, City Manager
CC Resolution 21-002 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Exhibit A

Page 254 of 520 ends

Council Agenda Report
From: Catherine Piatti, Finance Manager
Subject: Approval of a Resolution Updating and Establishing City User Fees for Various Regulatory Activities, Programs, and Services
CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from environmental review under Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), which provides an exemption for the establishment or modification of charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of meeting operating expenses.

Date: September 16, 2025
Facts

1. The City charges fees for certain services for which a particular individual or group is the primary beneficiary, as opposed to the public at large. In these instances, it is more equitable to charge for these services rather than subsidize them out of the General Fund.

2. For most fees, the City is not allowed to charge more than the reasonable cost of providing the service or performing the activity. For some (e.g., youth recreation), the City purposefully charges less than the cost of providing the service in an effort to maintain accessibility and affordability.

3. City staff annually review user and regulatory fees as part of the City’s normal course of operations and on June 18, 2024 City Council approved inflationary adjustments with other minor refinements to fees for Fiscal Year 2024-25. There has not been an update to fees since then.

4. The last citywide user and regulatory fee study was completed in 2005. Comprehensive fee studies should be performed periodically to ensure the City’s cost of providing services are accurate and appropriate.

5. In FY 2020-21, a citywide user fee study was a City Council goal and strategic priority. Due to various projects and events taking precedence (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic, January 2023 Storms, transparency software implementation), the project was delayed.

6. In March 2024, the City retained an independent consultant, ClearSource Financial Consulting (ClearSource), to facilitate the study.

7. The proposed fees for consideration are limited to fee-related services provided by the City’s public safety departments and non-development services fees. Development-related fees, such as permits and licenses, will be presented to City Council in early 2026 and as such are not included in this proceeding.

8. If Council adopts the proposed Comprehensive Fee Schedule, the updated fees will be effective November 16, 2025, 60 days from adoption.

9. On an annual basis, fees will be adjusted based on the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, California, calculated by the 12-month changes as of April each year. This adjustment will be effective July 1, 2026, and each July thereafter for all fees except Recreation Division fees, which will increase effective October 1, 2026, and every October 1 thereafter to accommodate the recreation programming season.

Page 255 of 520 ends

Community Outreach
Public noticing regarding the proposed fee changes has been provided as directed by the Mitigation Fee Act, codified pursuant to Government Code section 66000, et. seq. and more specifically the public meeting requirements of section 66016 and the public hearing requirements of section 66018. The City made publicly available the Study indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the Services for which the user fees are to be imposed, and the revenue sources anticipated to provide such programs and services at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. The City will hold a duly noticed public hearing at which all oral and written presentations are made as part of a regularly scheduled meeting and prior to holding said public hearing, the City published notice in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing pursuant to Government Code section 6062a. City provided written notice to any interest party having requested such notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date of the public hearing and said notices provided the date, time, and location of this public hearing. Additionally, relevant advisory bodies were provided with the opportunity to review the proposed updates at regularly scheduled advisory body meetings.

Options

1. Take no action, leaving fees unchanged;

2. Approve accompanying resolution updating and establishing various user and regulatory fees, based on the materials presented;

3. Approve any combination of partial implementations of the proposed changes;

4. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
The Citywide User and Regulatory Fee Study can be reviewed entirely in Exhibit C. Cities regularly conduct these studies to justify fee amounts imposed, and to optimize the overall portfolio of revenues available to the municipality to fund its services. Industry practice and fiscal conditions in the state have led most cities to link cost recovery for services of individual action, cause, or benefit to that same individual through user fee revenue, relieving the agency’s general revenues as much as possible for use toward services of broader community benefit.

User and regulatory fees are intended to cover all, or a portion of, the costs incurred by the City for providing fee-related services and activities that are not otherwise provided to those not paying the fee.

California law provides restrictions regarding the amounts the City may charge for fee-related services and activities. Specifically, in order to avoid being considered taxes, the fees charged shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services, activities, or materials for which fees are charged.

The services for which the City imposes a user or regulatory fee typically derive from an individual person or entity’s action, request, or behavior. Therefore, except in cases where there is an overwhelming public benefit generated by the City’s involvement in the individual action, a fee for service ensures that the individual bears most, if not all, of the cost incurred by the City to provide that service. When a fee targets “100% or full cost recovery,” the individual is bearing the entirety of the cost. When a fee targets less than full cost recovery, another City revenue source – in most cases, the General Fund – subsidizes the individualized activity.

Page 256 of 520 ends

Generally, fees for service are targeted to full cost recovery, inclusive of operating, direct, indirect, and capital costs, except in cases where the City Council cites a public interest in lower fees (e.g., parks and recreation fees). The City may also be influenced by market conditions or comparisons to municipalities of similar size and service profile.

During the course of study, information and analysis was generated and discussed substantively in the user and regulatory fee study included as an attachment to this report. Following, is a summary by broad fee category, of outcomes and proposals that may be of particular interest to the City Council.

It should be noted that the user and regulatory fee study will be completed and presented to the City Council in two phases:
 Phase One: Delivered to City Council in September 2025: Public Safety and Non-Development Services Fees – Fire Prevention Services Fees, Police Services Fees, Utilities Services Fees, Airport Fees, Library and Recreation Services Fees, Film and Commercial Photography Permit Fees, Administrative Fees.
 Phase Two: Delivered to City Council in early 2026: Development Services Fees – Building, Planning, and Engineering.

Exhibit B of Attachment 1 provides a before and after illustration of fees, and are summarized below:

Public Safety Fees
While most City public safety services such as emergency response and routine patrol services are tax funded services, the City’s public safety departments provide certain discrete services that are typically recovered via fees and charges (e.g., fire prevention services for review of new construction and certain operations and vehicles impound and release and requests for special reports). Fees for these services are proposed to be adjusted to recover the City’s costs of service.

Community Services Fees
Community services feesfor services such as reserved use of City indoor facilities, sports fields, and courts are proposed for minor modification. The City’s emphasis continues to be:
 Maintaining active, dynamic, use of public spaces.
 Prioritizing non-profit users.
 Providing multiple venue sizes and types with corresponding pricing to accommodate the needs of various users.

Additionally, staff recommends establishing a permit fee structure for recreation events outside of City Council-approved public events in the Downtown City Park.

Regardless, the City’s Library and Recreation Services continue to be primarily supported by the General Fund (i.e., highly subsidized services), in that only 1% of library costs are recovered from fees and fines and 10% of parks and recreation costs are recovered from fees.

Utility Services Fees
While most of the costs of City Utility Services are recovered via routine service billings (i.e., utility bills charges for services), the costs of providing certain discrete, non-routine, services are typically recovered via fees and charges (e.g., new utility account activation fees, meter installation fees). Fees for these services are proposed to be adjusted to recover the City’s costs of service.

Page 257 of 520 ends

Airport Fees
No changes are proposed to fees and charges for Paso Robles Municipal Airport based aircraft. However, transient aircraft parking fees are proposed to be adjusted with a new structure based on aircraft weight.

This is consistent with transient aircraft landing fees which are also based on aircraft weight. Additional new fees are proposed for short-term rental of unoccupied aircraft hangars.

Film and Commercial Photography Permit Fees
Fees are proposed to be adjusted to the scale of activity requested to be conducted within City limits, with lower fees for smaller scale/shorter duration events and productions, and higher fees for larger scale/longer duration events and productions. Larger productions typically require closure of streets, alley’s or other public spaces that create additional logistical and planning coordination requirements.

Administrative Fees
Administrative fees have been recalibrated to reflect current costs of service and State limits for certain fee-related services.

Regional Fee Comparison
Similar fees are collected by communities throughout the region and the State. The proposed fee amounts do not exceed the City’s cost of service and are in-range of amounts charged by other jurisdictions. Current and proposed fees were compared to amounts collected by other agencies. For sampling purposes, the fee comparison examined fees for:
 City of Atascadero
 City of Morro Bay
 City of San Luis Obispo
 County of San Luis Obispo
For the City, outcomes will show that new fees may range from low, mid, to upper end of regional fee spectrum depending on the service provided. This is common among municipalities due to differing levels of service and review included among various fee categories. Scenarios considered range from smaller scale projects to larger scale projects.

Fiscal Impact
The anticipated fiscal impact of the proposed fee adjustments is an additional $142,000 in annual General Fund cost recovery.

Additional revenues expected from proposed changes to fees and charges are intended to offset the cost of providing existing services associated with those fee-related functions. Additional fee revenue is not intended to fund new services.

Fee Related Services Current Fee Revenue Proposed Fee Revenue Fiscal Impact Fire Prevention Fees $258,000 $300,000 $42,000
Police Services Fees $186,000 $235,000 $49,000
Utilities Services Fees $44,000 $48,000 $4,000
Library $11,000 $11,000 $0
Recreation $469,000 $516,000 $47,000
Total $968,000 $1,110,000 $142,000

Page 258 of 520 ends

Fairly allocating costs to the services provided and recovering some, or all, of these costs from service recipients creates value and predictability for City customers and reimburses the City for services provided to a single party, as compared to the public at large. Collecting fees for services:
 Increases the availability of General Fund revenues to be used for services and activities available to all residents and businesses, such as public safety and public works services.  Helps meet fee-payer service level expectations by collecting fees to fund the existing level of services provided.

CEQA
The City finds that this action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from environmental review under Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), which provides an exemption for the establishment or modification of charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of meeting operating expenses
Recommendation (Option 2)
Approve Resolution 25-XXX, updating and establishing various user and regulatory fees for various City regulatory activities, programs, and services set forth in a comprehensive fee schedule.

Attachments

1. Resolution 25-XXX – User Fee Study
Exhibit A - Publication Notice of Public Hearing
Exhibit B - Illustration of Current and Proposed Fees
Exhibit C - User and Regulatory Fee Study
Exhibit D - Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees and Charges

Page 259 of 520 ends

RESOLUTION 25-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES UPDATING AND

ESTABLISHING USER AND REGULATORY FEES FOR VARIOUS CITY REGULATORY ACTIVITIES,

PROGRAMS, AND SERVICES SET FORTH IN A COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City of El Paso De Robles (the “City”) imposes certain user and regulatory fees established by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City recently retained the services of an independent rate consultant to conduct a User and Regulatory Fee Study (the “Study”), which is on file with the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference, analyzing the costs of providing various City regulatory activities, programs, and services (collectively, the “Services”); and WHEREAS, the Study, dated June 2025 examined fee-related Services provided by the City, the costs reasonably borne by the City in providing the Services, the beneficiaries of those Services, and the revenues produced by those paying fees and charges for such Services; and WHEREAS, the Study and the applicable user fees have been conducted in two phases with the first phase seeking approval this evening which includes user fees for public safety, airport, utility administration (non-regular service related fees), library, recreation, and administration Services; and the City Council will be presented the second phase at a later date, with due notice to be provided, to consider the adoption of proposed user fees for building, planning, engineering, and development services that are the responsibility of the Community Development Department of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that providing these Services is of direct benefit to applicants both separate and apart from the general benefit to the public; and therefore, in the interests of fairness to the general public, the City desires to better recover the costs of providing these Services from applicants who have sought or require them by revising its schedule of user fees; and WHEREAS, based upon the results of the Study, the existing user fees no longer adequately reflect the City’s costs of providing the Services; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the Study provides adequate evidence to conclude that the revised user fees do not exceed the reasonable estimated costs to provide the Services for which the user fees are charged; and
WHEREAS, the user fees are subject to the provisions of the Mitigation Fee Act, codified pursuant to Government Code section 66000 et. seq. and more specifically the public meeting requirements of section 66016 and the public hearing requirements of section 66018; and WHEREAS, the City made publicly available the Study indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the Services for which the user fees are to be imposed, and the revenue sources anticipated to provide such programs and services at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City has held a duly noticed public hearing at which all oral and written presentations were made as part of a regularly scheduled meeting; and

Page 260 of 520 ends

WHEREAS, prior to holding said public hearing, the City published notice in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing pursuant to Government Code section 6062a and provided written notice to any interest party having requested such notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date of the public hearing and said notices provided that the date, time, and location of this public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the question of whether or not to adjust or establish the user fees for the Services to reflect the estimated amount that is required to recover the estimated reasonable costs to the City in providing such Services; and WHEREAS, the amount of the user fees does not exceed the estimated cost of providing the Services; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt the user fees; and WHEREAS, in adopting this Resolution, the City Council is taking action only on those fees for the Services set forth in Exhibit “D,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, the remaining user fees that have not been modified by this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the setting or revision of user fees pursuant to this Resolution is exempt from environmental review under Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) of the California Environmental Quality Act, which provides an exemption for the establishment or modification of charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of meeting operating expenses.

Section 3. The City Council hereby finds that all substantive and procedural requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act have been satisfied and specifically, the City Council further finds the following:
a. based upon the information and documents prepared for and presented to the City Council to support this action, the user fees are for the purposes of and necessary for:
(i) meeting operating expenses, including employee wage rates and benefits; (ii) purchasing or leasing supplies, equipment, or materials; (iii) obtaining funds necessary for the operations and maintenance of City property and facilities; and (iv) any other costs incurred by the City attributable to providing the Services for which the user fees are imposed; and
b. the user fees specified by this Resolution do not exceed the reasonably estimated costs of providing the Services for which the user fees are imposed.

Section 4. The City Council hereby adopts the Schedule of User Fees and Charges as set forth in Exhibit “D,” attached hereto. Exhibit “D” shall be incorporated into the City’s consolidated schedule of fees.

Section 5. The City Council authorizes annually, effective July 1, 2026 and each July 1 thereafter, that the City Manager, or City Manager designee, may administratively adjust the user fees, without additional City Council action or approval, based on the percentage increase from the prior year annual percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for San

Page 261 of 520 ends

Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, California (“CPI”), calculated by the 12-month change as of April each year as published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, or a similar index if the CPI is no longer published or is otherwise not available. If the CPI does not change or decreases in any given year, no change shall be made to the user fee schedule applicable that year. In no event shall the user fees be increased annually to exceed the costs of providing the Services.

Section 6. Any and all provisions of prior resolutions of the City Council establishing or modifying user fees for the Services set forth in Exhibit “D,” are hereby repealed and replaced as of the effective date of this Resolution in the manner set forth in Exhibit “D” provided, however, that such repeal shall not excuse or affect the failure of any person or entity to pay any fee heretofore imposed upon such person or entity. The City Council desires to clarify that in adopting this Resolution, it is taking action only on those user fees for the Services set forth in Exhibit “D” which have been modified from prior resolutions of the City Council. The remaining user fees that have not been modified from prior resolutions shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one of or more sections, subsections, clauses, or phases be declared invalid or unconstitutional on their face or as applied.

Section 8. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. The user fees contained in Exhibit “D” shall become effective sixty (60) days following adoption of this Resolution.

APPROVED this 16th day of September 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk
Exhibit A - Publication Notice of Public Hearing
Exhibit B - Illustration of Current and Proposed Fees
Exhibit C - User and Regulatory Fee Study
Exhibit D - Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees and Charges

Page 262 of 520 ends

1000 Spring Street • Paso Robles, California 93446

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
“The Pass of the Oaks”
Notice of Public Hearing
City of Paso Robles - City Council
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, September 16, 2025 at 6:00 p.m., at the City Council Chambers located at 1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446 concerning adoption of a resolution imposing proposed increases and establishing certain user and regulatory fee amendments for various City regulatory activities, programs, and services in an effort to promote cost recovery for such services provided. The proposed amendmentsfor this public hearing include fees within the following departments/divisions:
• Public Safety; and
• Airport; and
• Utility Related Administration (non-regular service related fees); and • Library; and
• Recreation; and
• Administration
The information related to establishing the proposed user fees has been made publicly available at least 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing described above.

Please note, the City’s Community Development fees related to City building, planning, engineering, and development services are not proposed for increase at this public hearing and will be presented a future public hearing to be determined. Notice of such future public hearing for the proposed Community Development fee approval will be provided at a later date in compliance with state law.

At the public hearing, members of the public will be afforded an opportunity to make oral or written presentations concerning the proposed fees. Copies of the staff report and resolution describing the proposed fees will be available for review at the City Clerk’s Office at City Hall (1000 Spring Street) and on the City’s website at https://www.prcity.com no later than 72 hours preceding the hearing (copies are available for purchase for the cost of reproduction).

Questions about the proposed fees may be directed to the Administrative Services Department at (805) 237-3999 or via email at [email protected].

If you challenge the proposal in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Residents and interested parties can livestream the meeting at www.prcity.com/youtube, and call (805) 865-7276 to provide public comment via phone. The phone line will open just prior to the start of the meeting and remain open throughout the meeting to ensure the opportunity to comment on each item heard by the Council, other than brief reports and announcements by staff or the Council.

Exhibit A

Page 263 of 520 ends

1000 Spring Street • Paso Robles, California 93446
Written public comments can be submitted via email to [email protected] prior to 12:00 noon on the day of the Council meeting to be posted as an addendum to the Agenda. If submitting written comments in advance of the meeting, please note the agenda item by number or name. City Council meetings will be live-streamed during the meeting and also available to play later on YouTube by accessing the following link: www.prcity.com/youtube. Any writing or document pertaining to an open session item on this agenda which is distributed to a majority of the City Council after the posting of this agenda will be available for public inspection at the time the subject writing or document is distributed. The writing or document will be available for public review in the City Clerk’s Office, 1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA, during normal business hours, and may be posted on the City’s web site at www.prcity.com/meetings.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT Any individual, who because of a disability needs special assistance to attend or participate in this meeting, may request assistance by contacting the City Clerk’s Office (805) 237- 3960. Whenever possible, requests should be made four (4) working days in advance of the meeting.

Exhibit A

Page 264 of 520 ends

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

CITY OF PASO ROBLES -

CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, September 16, 2025 at 6:00 p.m., at the City Council Chambers located at 1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446
concerning adoption of a resolution imposing proposed
increases and establishing certain user and regulatory fee amendments for various City regulatory activities, programs, and services in an effort to promote cost recovery for such services provided. The proposed amendments for this public hearing include fees within the following departments/
divisions:
• Public Safety; and
• Airport; and
• Utility Related Administration (non-regular service related fees); and
• Library; and
• Recreation; and
• Administration
The information related to establishing the proposed user fees has been made publicly available at least 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing described above.

At the public hearing, members of the public will be afforded an opportunity to make oral or written presentations
concerning the proposed fees. Copies of the staff report and resolution describing the proposed fees will be available for review at the City Clerk’s Office at City Hall (1000 Spring Street) and on the City’s website at https://www.prcity.com no later than 72 hours preceding the hearing (copies are available for purchase for the cost of reproduction).

Questions about the proposed fees may be directed to the Administrative Services Department at (805) 237-3999 or via email at [email protected].

Written public comments can be submitted via email to
[email protected] prior to 12:00 noon on the day of the Council meeting to be posted as an addendum to the Agenda.

If submitting written comments in advance of the meeting, please note the agenda item by number or name. City Council meetings will be live-streamed during the meeting and also available to play later on YouTube by accessing the following link: www.prcity.com/youtube. Any writing or document
pertaining to an open session item on this agenda which is distributed to a majority of the City Council after the posting of this agenda will be available for public inspection at the time the subject writing or document is distributed. The writing or document will be available for public review in the City Clerk’s Office, 1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA, during normal business hours, and may be posted on the City’s web site at www.prcity.com/meetings.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT Any individual, who
because of a disability needs special assistance to attend or participate in this meeting, may request assistance by contacting the City Clerk’s Office (805) 237-3960. Whenever possible, requests should be made four (4) working days in advance of the meeting.

September 4 & 11, 2025 Exhibit A

Page 265 of 520 ends

Before and After Illustration of Fees
Exhibit B

Page 266 of 520 ends

Description Page
Emergency Services Fees / Fire Prevention Fees 1
Police Fees 6
Utilities - Water and Wasterwater Fees 10
Airport Fees 12
Library Fees 14
Recreation Fees 15
Recreation Event Permit Fees 20
Film and Commercial Photography Permit Fees 21
Administrative Fees 23
City of Paso Robles
Before and After Illustration of Fees
Exhibit B

Page 267 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - EMERGENCY SERVICES FEES Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Note Construction Permits Automatic Fire-Extinguishing System 1 Residential - 13D Systems
a) Under 3500 SF $501 $602 $602 $101 100%
b) Over 3500 SF (3 hr min.)
i) First 3 Hours $729 $1,173 $1,173 $444 100%
ii) Each Additional Hour $78 $187 $187 $109 100%
2 Commercial/Industrial/Multi-Family Systems
a) 1 - 50 Heads $1,317 $1,373 $1,373 $56 100%
b) 51 - 100 Heads $1,568 $1,610 $1,610 $42 100%
c) 101 - 200 Heads $1,820 $1,847 $1,847 $27 100%
d) 201 - 300 Heads $2,071 $2,321 $2,321 $250 100%
e) 301 - 500 Heads $2,810 $3,289 $3,289 $479 100%
f) 501 - 1,000 Heads $4,039 $4,317 $4,317 $278 100%
g) 1,001 - 2,000 Heads $6,661 $7,241 $7,241 $580 100%
h) Each Additional 100 Heads $980 $1,067 $1,067 $87 100% 3 Minor Sprinkler Modification Permit (1-10 heads) - Not requiring sprinkler calculations $559 $296 $296 ($263) 100% 4 Certificate of Occupancy - Inspection - Hourly (1 hr min.) $251 $237 $237 ($14) 100% 5 Chemical Extinguishing Systems - (Wet or Dry) $752 $899 $899 $147 100% Fire Alarm and Detection Systems & Related Equipment
6 Fire Sprinkler Supervision $576 $699 $699 $123 100%
7 Fire Alarm Systems
a) Fire Alarm Systems 0-15 Devices $695 $799 $799 $104 100% b) Fire Alarm Systems 16 - 30 Devices $940 $1,018 $1,018 $78 100% c) Fire Alarm Systems 31 - 50 Devices $1,215 $1,275 $1,275 $59 100% d) Fire Alarm Systems 51 - 100 Devices $1,310 $1,355 $1,355 $44 100% e) Each 5 additional Devices $126 $119 $119 ($7) 100%
8 Minor Alarm System Modification $274 $296 $296 $22 100% 9 Public Safety Radio Repeater System
a) Public Safety Radio Repeater System Assessment (2 hr min.) $156 $374 $374 $218 100% b) Public Safety Radio Repeater System Permit (2 hr min.) i) First 2 Hours $1,163 $1,185 $1,185 $22 100%
ii) Each Additional Hour $252 $187 $187 ($65) 100%
Activity Description
1 Exhibit B

Page 268 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - EMERGENCY SERVICES FEES Activity Description Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Note 10 Underground Fire Line
a) Underground Fire Line - One Riser (Includes 1 re-inspection) $1,138 $1,223 $1,223 $85 100% b) Underground Fire Line - One Hydrant (Includes 1 re-inspection) $1,138 $1,223 $1,223 $85 100% c) Each Additional Riser/Hydrant $178 $296 $296 $118 100% 11 Standpipe
a) Standpipe with PRV (Per Outlet) $216 $533 $533 $318 100% b) Standpipe without PRV's (Per Outlet) $194 $415 $415 $221 100% 12 Paint Spray Booth (Connected to sprinkler system) $429 $711 $711 $282 100% 13 Fire Pumps & Related Equipment $784 $1,422 $1,422 $638 100% 14 Foam Systems $429 $711 $711 $282 100%
15 IFC Fire Code Interpretation Appeals $747 $1,422 $1,422 $675 100% 16 Restaurant Hood System $712 $649 $649 ($63) 100%
17 Minor Hood System Modification $274 $281 $281 $7 100% 18 Vehicle Gate Access (Fire Apparatus Access) $274 $421 $421 $147 100% 19 Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems formula fee formula fee formula fee [a] 2 Exhibit B

Page 269 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - EMERGENCY SERVICES FEES Activity Description Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Note Operational Permits
20 Adult Care Facility - Annual Permit $187 $474 $474 $287 100% 21 Aircraft Refueling Vehicles - Per Inspection/2 per year $93 $95 $95 $1 100% [b] 22 Aircraft Refueling Station - Inspection $93 $178 $178 $84 100% 23 Carnivals and Fairs - Per Event $560 $795 $795 $235 100% 24 High Piled Combustible Storage - Annual Permit $187 $356 $356 $169 100% 25 Pyrotechnics and Fireworks - Per Event
a) Proximate Audience $560 $561 $561 $1 100%
b) Outdoor Aerial $560 $701 $701 $141 100%
26 Tents or Canopies - Per Event $187 $474 $474 $287 100% 27 Apartment Inspections (3 Units or more) [c]
a) Under 8 Units $93 $95 $95 $1 100%
b) 8 - 19 Units $160 $178 $178 $18 100%
c) 20 - 39 Units $224 $237 $237 $13 100%
d) 40 - 99 Units $287 $356 $356 $68 100%
e) 100 - 199 Units $352 $415 $415 $63 100%
f) 200 Units or more $416 $474 $474 $58 100%
28 Commercial Business Inspections [c]
a) 500 Square Feet or Less $93 $95 $95 $1 100%
b) 501 Square Feet - 999 Square Feet $128 $119 $119 ($9) 100% c) 1,000 Square Feet - 1,999 Square Feet $160 $178 $178 $18 100% d) 2,000 Square Feet - 4,999 Square Feet $192 $237 $237 $45 100% e) 5,000 Square Feet - 9,999 Square Feet $320 $296 $296 ($24) 100% f) 10,000 Square Feet - 19,999 Square Feet $384 $356 $356 ($28) 100% g) 20,000 Square Feet - 29,999 Square Feet $448 $415 $415 ($33) 100% h) 30,000 Square Feet - 49,999 Square Feet $512 $474 $474 ($38) 100% i) 50,000 Square Feet - 99,999 Square Feet $512 $533 $533 $22 100% j) 100,000 Square Feet - 149,999 Square Feet $512 $593 $593 $81 100% k) Each Additional 50,000 Square Feet or Fraction Thereof n/a - new $59 $59 100% 29 Business Re-Inspection (Failure to Comply) $140 $356 $178 $38 50% 30 New Business Inspections (New Business Licenses) $93 $237 $119 $25 50% 31 Business Self-Inspection $45 $119 $59 $14 50%
3 Exhibit B

Page 270 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - EMERGENCY SERVICES FEES Activity Description Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Note Other Services
32 Hourly Billing Rates for Special Service Requests
a) Firefighter / Paramedic- (Hourly Rate) $181 $126 $126 ($55) 100% b) Engineer / Paramedic - (Hourly Rate) $187 $145 $145 ($42) 100% c) Captain / Paramedic - (Hourly Rate) $233 $175 $175 ($58) 100% d) Fire Prevention (Hourly Rate) varies $237 $237 varies 100% e) Fire Prevention Specialist (Hourly Rate) $78 $187 $187 $109 100% f) Fire Marshal - (Hourly Rate) $252 $327 $327 $75 100% g) Administrative Coordinator I- Clerical (Hourly Rate) $70 $170 $170 $100 100% h) Battalion Chief - (Hourly Rate) $252 $205 $205 ($47) 100% i) Deputy Fire Chief - (Hourly Rate) varies $367 $367 varies 100% j) Fire Chief - (Hourly Rate) $280 $409 $409 $129 100%
k) Paramedic Unit Standby - (Hourly Rate) $541 $426 $426 ($115) 100% l) Engine Company / DUI Response - (Hourly Rate) $958 $620 $620 ($338) 100% m) Extraordinary Response - High Use (Per Company, Hourly Rate) $467 $350 $350 ($117) 100% n) Hazardous Materials Clean-Up formula fee formula fee [a] o) Structure Fire - Per Incident for Insurance Billing (Hourly Rate) formula fee formula fee [a] 33 Inspection Prior to Permit $284 $356 $356 $72 100%
34 Inspections- Work Commenced Without Permit(s) $284 $474 $474 $190 100% 35 Re-Inspection - (Construction Permits) $252 $237 $237 ($15) 100% 36 Emergency Inspection Fee (Under 24 hours notice) $503 $474 $474 ($29) 100% 37 Additional Site Inspection Fee (1 hour min.) $252 $237 $237 ($15) 100% 38 Extra Fire Plan Check / Inspection $252 $237 $237 ($15) 100% 39 Re-Submittal of Plans / Additional Plan Review- Hourly (1 hr. min.) $307 $237 $237 ($70) 100% 40 Title-19
a) Title-19 - Automatic Fire Extinguishing Five-Year Test $252 $296 $296 $44 100% b) Title-19 - Additional Riser without FDC $190 $237 $237 $47 100% c) Title-19 - Delinquency of Reporting (Hourly Rate) $78 $237 $237 $159 100% [d] 4 Exhibit B

Page 271 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - EMERGENCY SERVICES FEES Activity Description Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Note 41 False Alarm
a) False Alarm - Failure To Notify - Testing/Maintenance $128 $683 $150 $22 22% [e] b) False Alarm - Repetitive (3 - 5 Within Prior 365 Day Period) $560 $683 $600 $40 88% c) False Alarm - Repetitive (6 or More Within Prior 365 Day Period) $560 $920 $900 $340 98% 42 Weed Abatement formula fee formula fee [a]
43 Electronic Archiving / Records Management
a) Electronic Archiving - Size A&B (per page) $0.20 $0.20 $0.00 b) Electronic Archiving - Size C (per page) $0.45 $0.45 $0.00 c) Electronic Archiving - Size D&E (per page) $2.00 $2.00 $0.00 d) Record Management Fee (each) $15 $15 $0
[c] Apartment/Commercial Business inspection fees are pro-rated; based upon estimated personnel time dependent on size of business. Includes one reinspection within 30 days. [d] Continued delinquency will result in an Administrative Citation. [e] More than 1 within prior 365 day period.
[a] Total fee will be billed based upon actual time and materials required to provide the service using the rates established for the Emergency Services Department. [b] Fee is based on two inspections per year, billed when each inspection is completed. 5 Exhibit B

Page 272 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - POLICE FEES
Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Note 1 Officer - (Hourly Rate) $93 $119 $119 $26 100%
2 Sergeant - (Hourly Rate) $125 $148 $148 $23 100%
3 Community Services Officer - (Hourly Rate) $63 $82 $82 $19 100% 4 Dispatcher - (Hourly Rate) $69 $89 $89 $20 100%
5 Records Clerk - (Hourly Rate) $48 $68 $68 $20 100%
6 Flash Drive / Thumb Drive / Digital Storage Device n/a - new $10 $10 n/a - new 100% 7 Crime Report $40 $55 $50 $10 92%
8 Traffic Collision Report- property damage only $53 $55 $50 ($3) 92% 9 Traffic Collision Report- Full Investigation $86 $109 $100 $14 92% 10 Daily Log (copy) $7 $9 $7 $0 73%
11 Clearance Letter $46 $55 $50 $4 92%
12 Photo -Digital on CD $40 $55 $50 $10 92%
13 Video DVD $86 $109 $100 $14 92%
14 Audio DVD $86 $109 $100 $14 92%
15 Livescan Fingerprint Service $46 $55 $50 $4 92%
16 Vehicle Release $174 $218 $200 $26 92%
17 Citation Sign Off (Excludes Commercial Vehicle Violations) $21 $32 $20 ($1) 63% 18 Vehicle Repossession $15 $15 $0 [a]
19 Alarm Permit $78 $109 $80 $2 73%
20 False Alarm (after 3 responses) $46 $96 $80 $34 84% [b] Activity Description
6 Exhibit B

Page 273 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - POLICE FEES
Activity Description Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Note 21 Second Hand Dealer Permit $300 $412 $350 $50 85%
22 Taxi Permit $438 $531 $500 $62 94%
23 Concealed Weapons Permit $125 $1,785 $185 $60 10%
24 Concealed Weapons Permit - renewal $25 $301 $70 $45 23% 25 Concealed Weapons Permit - Modification / Duplicate $10 $67 $25 $15 38% 26 Concealed Weapons Permit - Psychological Assessment Pass-thru Pass-Through 100% 27 Subpoena Process Fee $15 Max Allowable [a]
28 Firearm seizure, impound and release $114 $174 $125 $11 72% 29 Card Dealer Permit $422 $531 $500 $78 94%
30 Card Dealer Permit Renewal $110 $114 $110 ($0) 96%
31 Massage Permit Application Review $90 $354 $300 $210 85% 7 Exhibit B

Page 274 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - POLICE FEES
Activity Description Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Note Vehicle Code Parking Violations
32 Park in Bike Lane - 21211(b) CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 33 Park Unlawfully within an Intersection - 22500(a) CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 34 Park within Crosswalk - 22500(b) CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 35 Park Blocking a Driveway - 22500(e) CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 36 Park on a Sidewalk - 22500(f) CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 37 Double Parking - 22500(h) CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine
38 Park in Posted Bus Loading Zone - 22500(i) CVC $150 $150 $0 n/a - fine 39 Park Blocking Wheelchair Access - 22500(i) CVC $285 $285 $0 n/a - fine 40 Stopping in a Fire Lane - 22500.1 CVC $150 $150 $0 n/a - fine 41 Park Right Wheel within 18" of Curb - 22502(a) CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 42 Park in Painted Disabled Crosshatch Lines - 22507.8(c) CVC $285 $285 $0 n/a - fine 43 Zero-Emission Vehicle Parking - 22511.1 CVC $100 $100 $0 n/a - fine [a] 44 Park Vehicle within 15' of Fire Hydrant - 22514 CVC $150 $150 $0 n/a - fine 45 Open/Leave Open Vehicle Doors to Traffic - 22517 CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 46 Park within 7' 6" of Railroad Tracks - 22521 CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 47 Park within 3' of Sidewalk Access Ramp - 22522 CVC $285 $285 $0 n/a - fine 48 Expired Registration - 4000(a) CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 49 No Front Plate - 5200(a) CVC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine
50 Correctable Violation Fee - 40225 CVC $10 $10 $0 n/a - fine [a] 51 Failure to Display Handicap Placard - 40226 CVC $25 $25 $0 n/a - fine [a] 8 Exhibit B

Page 275 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - POLICE FEES
Activity Description Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Note Paso Robles Municipal Code Parking Violations
52 Parking on Street over 72 Hours - 12.32.060 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 53 Stopping/Standing/Parking in a Parkway Prohibited - 12.32.050 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 54 Park on Street for Repairs - 12.32.070 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 55 Angle Parking - 12.32.080 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 56 Park Adjacent to School when Signs Prohibit - 12.32.100 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 57 Parking Prohibited by Posted Signs - 12.32.150 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 58 Park on Private Property without Consent - 12.32.170 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 59 Curb Markings: Red/Yellow/White/Green - 12.36.020 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 60 Parking in Alley - 12.36.060 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 61 Prohibited Parking - 12.38.010 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 62 Parking Space Markings - 12.38.030 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 63 Trailer/RV Parked without Permit - 12.38.035 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 64 Commercial Vehicle Parking - 12.38.040 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 65 Disabled Parking - 12.38.045 PRMC $285 $285 $0 n/a - fine [a] 66 Limited Time Parking - 12.38.050 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 67 Park within Painted Markings - 12.42.050 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine 68 Vehicle Mounted Sign - 21.19.110 PRMC $50 $50 $0 n/a - fine [a] State Mandated Fee.
[b] Fee applies to the 4th false alarm within the permit holder’s annual period and continues to double with each subsequent false alarm thereafter. 9 Exhibit B

Page 276 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - UTILITIES FEES
Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Charge Basis Note 1 Utilities Maintenance Standard Hourly Rate
a) Utility Maintenance Worker Standard Hourly Rate
i) During Regular Business Hours $211 $125 $125 ($86) 100% per hour ii) Outside of Regular Business Hours (i.e., Overtime) $211 $144 $144 ($67) 100% per hour b) Utility Supervisor Standard Hourly Rate
i) During Regular Business Hours $211 $186 $186 ($25) 100% per hour ii) Outside of Regular Business Hours (i.e., Overtime) $211 $214 $214 $3 100% per hour 2 Equipment Use Fees See Caltrans Rate
Schedule
See Caltrans Rate
Schedule
[a]
3 Special Door Hanger $60 $63 $60 $0 96%
4 Routine Door Hanger $46 $52 $50 $4 96%
5 PENALTY Water Meter Lock Tampering - 1st Offense (plus labor and materials costs for repairs or equipment replacement)
$86 $100 $14 [b]
6 PENALTY Water Meter Lock Tampering - 2nd Offense (plus labor and materials costs for repairs or equipment replacement)
$131 $200 $69 [b]
7 PENALTY Customer Damage to Water Meter (plus labor and materials costs for repairs or equipment replacement)
$174 $200 $26 [b]
8 Meter Re-read $53 $63 $60 $7 96%
9 Bench/Calibration Test $260 $250 $250 ($10) 100%
10 After Hours Connection- New customer $125 $288 $288 $163 100% 11 <30 days Hydrant Meter Rental
a) Hydrant Meter Deposit $1,500 $1,500 $0
b) Hydrant Meter Set $211 $219 $219 $8 100%
c) Hydrant Meter Relocation $105 $125 $125 $20 100%
12 New Account Activation (Turn-On) $60 $63 $60 $0 96%
13 New Account Deposit $131 $135 $4
14 Service Restoration (due to non-payment or unauthorized use) - 8:00 A.M. to 3:30 P.M.
$59 $125 $61 $2 48% [c]
15 Service Restoration-after hours (due to non-payment or unauthorized use) - 3:31 P.M. to 7:59 A.M.
$177 $288 $182 $5 63% [c]
Activity Description
10 Exhibit B

Page 277 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - UTILITIES FEES
Activity Description Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Change Cost Recovery Charge Basis Note Water Meter Fees
16 Install meter only - 3/4" $392 $500 $500 $108 100%
17 Install meter only - 1" $473 $500 $500 $27 100%
18 Install meter only - 1.5" $1,464 $1,500 $1,500 $36 100% 19 Install meter only - 2" $1,598 $2,000 $2,000 $402 100% 20 Tie Into Water Main (based on specific labor, equipment, and material costs)
Time & Materials Time & Materials
[a] Based on the current adopted Caltrans Schedule.
[c] Per Senate Bill 998 amount is adjusted annually by change in regional CPI. [b] In addition to penalty amount listed, the City will pass-through all material and labor costs needed to repair and/or replace box, lid, meter, encoder, endpoint, valves, piping, associated meter components, etc. 11 Exhibit B

Page 278 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - AIRPORT FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note
Transient Aircraft Parking
1 Transient Aircraft Parking Fee [a],[b]
a) 0 to 6,000 pounds varies $10 varies any portion of a 24-hour period b) 6,001 to 12,500 pounds varies $15 varies any portion of a 24-hour period c) 12,501 pounds to 30,000 pounds varies $150 varies any portion of a 24-hour period d) Above 30,000 pounds varies $250 varies any portion of a 24-hour period Based Aircraft Parking
2 Based Aircraft Parking Fee [a]
a) Single Engine $50 $50 $0 per month
b) Twin Engine $75 $75 $0 per month
c) Jet $350 $350 $0 per month
d) Non-Operational Aircraft Tiedown 100% Surcharge 100% Surcharge $0 per month [c] Transient Landing
3 Transient Landing Fee
a) < 20,000 pounds $15 $15 $0 per landing
b) 20,001-26,000 pounds $30 $30 $0 per landing
c) 26,001-35,000 pounds $40 $40 $0 per landing
d) 35,001-50,000 pounds $110 $110 $0 per landing
e) 50,001-70,000 pounds $140 $140 $0 per landing
f) 70,001-90,000 pounds $155 $155 $0 per landing
g) 90,001-120,000 pounds $180 $180 $0 per landing
h) 120,001-155,000 pounds $195 $195 $0 per landing
i) > 155,001-220,000 max pounds $250 $250 $0 per landing [d] Enplanement / Terminal Use Boarding
4 Enplanement Fee $2.00 $4.50 $2.50 per enplaned passenger [e] 5 Terminal Use / Boarding $35 $35 $0 per flight [f]
Long-Term Parking - Vehicles
6 Long-Term Parking - Vehicles
a) Passenger Car $40 $60 $20 per month
b) Trucks or Larger $55 $75 $20 per month
Airport Operating Permit
7 Airport Operating Permit per activity or impact level, 0-100, with annual max of 1,200 activities
$15 $15 $0 per month
8 Airport Operating Permit per activity or impact level, 101- 500, with annual max of 6,000 activities
$35 $35 $0 per month
9 Airport Operating Permit per activity or impact level, 501 or more activities
$310 $310 $0 per month
Activity Description
12 Exhibit B

Page 279 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - AIRPORT FEES
Activity Description Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note Fuel Flowage
10 Fuel Flowage (AvGas) $0.10 $0.10 $0.00 per gallon
11 Fuel Flowage (Jet Fuel) $0.12 $0.12 $0.00 per gallon Short-Term Hangar Rental
12 Short-Term Hangar Rental n/a - new $50 n/a - new per night, per site [g] 13 Short-Term Hangar Rental Aircraft Towing n/a - new $100 n/a - new per one-way tow 14 Cancellation Fee
a) Cancellation Due to Airfield Closure or Unsafe Flying Conditions (weather)
n/a - new Full refund n/a - new
b) Cancellation Notice Received at Least 72 hours Prior to Reservation Start Date
n/a - new Full refund n/a - new
c) Cancellation Notice Received Less than 72 hours Prior to Reservation Start Date
n/a - new No refund n/a - new
Terminal Building/Airfield Use/Rental - per sq ft
15 Terminal Building Use/Rental - per sq ft $2 $2 $0 per event 16 Airfield Access Rental (Non-Aviation) $1,500 $1,500 $0 per event Airport Testing Site Usage
17 Container Storage - 20 ft $100 $100 $0 per month [h] 18 Reservation and Use of Site $150 $150 $0 per day
19 Test Booth Rental n/a - new $150 n/a - new per day
Specialized Equipment Use
20 Specialized Equipment Use See Caltrans Rate Schedule See Caltrans Rate Schedule [e] Amount authorized by FAA. In the event of a discrepancy between the amount shown and the amount authorized by FAA, the amount authorized by FAA shall supersede this amount. [f] In the event of a discrepancy between the amount shown and the amount authorized by FAA, the amount authorized by FAA shall supersede this amount. [h] Container storage is for testing site equipment/materials only. [g] Site availability and aircraft space needs to be determined by airport manager. [a] Per Resolution 23-113, parking fees are applicable to aircraft on public areas, not private lease sites. [b] Transient aircraft parking fees are assessed according to the maximum takeoff weight. [c] Surcharge is applied based on applicable monthly based aircraft parking fee per aircraft type. [d] Over 155,000 pounds will be considered on a case-by-case basis; additional requirements and restrictions may apply. 13 Exhibit B

Page 280 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - LIBRARY FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Change Note
Replacement Fee for Lost or Damaged Material Beyond Repair 1 Adult fiction $37 $35 ($2)
2 Adult nonfiction $43 $45 $2
3 Juvenile fiction $29 $30 $1
4 Juvenile nonfiction $29 $30 $1
5 Juvenile paperback $15 $15 $0
6 Periodical $9 $10 $1
7 Pamphlet $5 $5 $0
8 Book on CD (Per Set) $75 $75 $0
9 Juvenile Book on CD (Per Set) $50 $50 $0
10 Children's book & CD set (Per Set) $25 $25 $0
11 DVD $21 $20 ($1)
12 DVD Sets (3+ Discs) $50 $50 $0
13 Hotspots $100 $100 $0
14 Launchpads $150 $150 $0
15 Book Club Kits $180 $180 $0
16 Laptops / Tablets $800 $800 $0
17 Hotspot/Launchpad Cable, Charger, Case, SIM Card (Per Item) $10 $10 $0 18 Processing fee for replacement items (includes items not listed above or items replaced by patron) $10 $5 ($5) Repair Damaged Material
19 Adult fiction $5 $5 $0
20 Adult nonfiction $5 $5 $0
21 Juvenile fiction $5 $5 $0
22 Juvenile nonfiction $5 $5 $0
23 Periodical $5 $5 $0
24 Book on CD $5 $5 $0
25 Children's Book & CD set $5 $5 $0
26 DVD $5 $5 $0
Collection Fee
27 Collection Fee n/a $10 new - add to schedule
* No refunds of fees paid for lost or damaged materials.

Activity Description
14 Exhibit B

Page 281 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - RECREATION FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note
Aquatics Programs
1 Public Swim
a) Public Swim - Daily Pass $5 $5 $0 per pass
b) Public Swim - 10 Punch Pass $45 $45 $0 per pass
c) Public Swim - 100 Punch Pass $400 $400 $0 per pass
2 Lap Swim
a) Lap Swim - Daily Pass $3 $3 $0 per pass
b) Lap Swim - 10 Punch Pass $25 $27 $2 per pass
3 SKWIM
a) SKWIM - Daily Pass $3 $3 $0 per pass
b) SKWIM - 10 Punch Pass $25 $27 $2 per pass
4 Swim Lessons
a) Group Swim Lessons $72 $80 $8
b) Teen Swim Lessons $72 $80 $8
c) Private Swim Lessons $83 $90 $7
d) Adaptive Swim Lessons $174 $180 $6
5 Diving Lessons $72 $80 $8
6 Junior Guard $147 $120 ($27)
7 Trainings / Certification Classes
a) American Red Cross Lifeguard Certification $100 $100 $0 b) Adult and Pediatric First Aid/CPR/AED $100 $100 $0
c) Babysitting $100 $100 $0
8 Other Aquatics Programs and Classes $25 - $200 [a]
Pool Rental
9 Pool Rental
a) Centennial Pool $100 $110 $10 per hour; 2-hour min
b) Municipal Pool $90 $100 $10 per hour; 2-hour min
Activity Description
[b] Contracted program fees are set by contractor. City receives 30% of program fee. [c] Any adjustments to recreational fees shall be effective on the soonest October 1st following the date of adjustment to accommodate seasonal programming. [a] Fees for aquatics programs not otherwise listed in this fee schedule will be established by the Director, based on staff time and participant staff ratio. 15 Exhibit B

Page 282 of 520 ends

City of Paso Robles

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - RECREATION FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Fee Change Charge Basis Note
Rental of Sports Fields
1 Sports Fields
a) Youth Leagues - Games, Practices, Clinics
i) Tier I Fields $4 $6 $2 per hour; per field [a],[d]
ii) Tier II Fields $4 $5 $1 per hour; per field [b],[d] iii) Tier III Fields $4 $4 $0 per hour; per field [c],[d] b) Adult Leagues - Games, Practices, Clinics
i) Tier I Fields $20 $24 $4 per hour; per field [a],[d] ii) Tier II Fields $20 $22 $2 per hour; per field [b],[d] iii) Tier III Fields $20 $20 $0 per hour; per field [c],[d] c) Field Light Use, All Leagues n/a - new $10 new per hour; per field 2 Tournament Use
Full Use - Saturday and Sunday (7am - 10pm) a) Youth Leagues (4 fields at Barney Schwartz Park) i) Up to 30 Teams $1,239 $1,250 $11 per weekend
ii) 31 - 60 Teams $1,239 $1,750 $511 per weekend
iii) More than 60 Teams $1,239 $2,000 $761 per weekend
b) Adult Leagues (4 fields at Barney Schwartz Park)
i) Up to 30 Teams $1,487 $1,500 $13 per weekend
ii) 31 - 60 Teams $1,487 $2,000 $513 per weekend
iii) More than 60 Teams $1,487 $2,250 $763 per weekend
[g] The City may enter into separate agreement with user groups for reserved field use. [b] Tier II fields include Sherwood Park Bynum youth baseball field, Henandez youth baseball field, Robbins youth ball field, Sherwood soccer fields. [c] Tier III fields include Sherwood Park Silva youth baseball field, Pioneer Park youth baseball field, Larry Moore fields.

Activity Description
[a] Tier I fields include Barney Schwartz Park softball and soccer fields. [d] From time to time the Director may reclassify fields due to activation of new fields, restoration of existing fields, etc. The Director's reclassification shall superseded classifications identified in this fee schedule. [e] Contracted program fees are set by contractor. City receives 30% of program fee. [f] Any adjustments to recreational fees shall be effective on the soonest October 1st following the date of adjustment to accommodate seasonal programming. 16 Exhibit B

Page 283 of 520 ends

Paso Robles City CouncilSeptember 16, 2025

Paso Robles City Council
September 16, 2025