Paso Robles City Council
May 5, 2026

Related Entitlement Applications
In total, the project proposes the development of a 154-unit residential subdivision consisting of for-sale, townhome-style units. The project includes the following entitlement requests that were previously approved by the City Council at the April 21, 2026 public hearing:
 Planned Development 25-14 (“PD25-14”) and Conditional Use Permit 25-05 (“CUP25-05”):
o To establish a 154-unit residential development;
 Modification 26-04 (“MOD26-04”)
o To allow deviations from specific Zoning Code development standards, including:
 Objective Design Standard Tier 1 – A portion of the project’s frontage along Ardmore Road (facing west) will not have pedestrian-oriented entries along the street frontage;
 Objective Design Standard Tier 4 – The project incorporates only one (1) out of the two (2) required design strategies for roofs;
 Objective Design Standard Eave Projections – The project will have eaves that project between 0 and 12 inches beyond the roofline, instead of the required 18 inches;
 Hillside Development Standards – The project will include retaining walls in five locations throughout the project site in which the heights exceed the six-foot maximum height by more than two feet; and
 Vesting Tentative Tract Map 3255 (“VTTM 3255”):
o To subdivide the site into 154 individual fee-simple residential lots, ten common lots, and the proposed right-of-way for the Ardmore Road extension; and  Oak Tree Removal 25-09 (“OTR25-09”)
o To allow the removal of six (6) Valley Oak trees totaling 265-inches, and the replanting of thirty-four (34) 2-inch diameter mitigation Oak trees.

Affordability Component
The Project includes an affordable housing component modeled after the County of San Luis Obispo’s Regional Housing Incentive Program, a point-based system designed to simplify access to development incentives similar to the State Affordable Housing Density Bonus Program. The applicant has proposed to contribute an in-lieu fee equivalent to two points in the County system, payable to the City for use in a future tax-credit affordable housing project. This structure would allow the contribution to be leveraged through state, federal, and tax-exempt financing programs, significantly amplifying available nonprofit housing funds.

While staff recognize that the City Council has not formally adopted the County’s incentive plan, it provides a useful framework to advance the Council’s goals and objectives for increasing affordable housing until a more detailed Council policy is established.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of the Project is not anticipated to result in any negative fiscal impacts to the City. The proposed residential development is expected to generate ongoing, long-term positive fiscal benefits through

increased property tax revenues, building permit and plan check fees, and one-time development impact fees associated with 154 new residential units.

In addition, the Project is expected to contribute modest ongoing General Fund revenues through increased service population, including potential sales tax from construction-related activity and future household consumption, as well as other routine municipal revenue sources. Furthermore, the Project includes an affordable housing in-lieu contribution of $60,000, which will provide additional funding support for future income-restricted housing opportunities within the City.

Overall, the Project is expected to provide a net positive fiscal benefit to the City over time while not creating any new long-term operational or maintenance obligations beyond those already anticipated within existing service levels.

CEQA
On February 20, 2024, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for a commercial/industrial project (“Covelop”) consisting of 240,000 square feet of floor area spanning six buildings for this project site. As lead agency, and as part of the City’s due diligence, the City required a supplemental Noise Analysis, supplemental Arborist Report, and supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis to determine if the proposed Project would result in any new or more severe significant effects not identified in the original MND. Based on these studies, and a full analysis of the scope of the Project, and the previously adopted 2024 MND, none of the criteria specified in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring a subsequent or supplemental environmental document to be prepared is triggered. In particular, there have been no: (1) substantial changes in the project that will require major revisions to the previous MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effect; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effect; and (3) new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous MND was adopted that shows: (a) the Project would have significant effects not discussed in the previous MND; (b) the Project would have more severe environmental effects; or (4) mitigation measures previously found to be infeasible or new mitigation measures now exist and would be feasible and would reduce significant effects. Therefore, an addendum is the appropriate document under CEQA to analyze the consistency of the Project with the type and intensity of development previously analyzed for the site in the MND as provided for in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 and 15164.

The Addendum incorporates the mitigation measures detailed in the MND. The incorporation of these measures ensures that previously adopted mitigation will be implemented for the Project and that no significant impacts will result from the Project and no new or increased significant impacts will result from the Project. No new or modified mitigation is available, and all impacts will be reduced to a less-thansignificant level with the existing mitigation measures.

Recommendation (Option 2)
Approve second reading by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 1170 N.S., amending Title 21, Zoning Code, and Zoning Map for 2930 Union Road (Lots 6 & 13 of APN 025-362-050).

Attachments

1. Vicinity Map

2. Ordinance 1170 – Oak at Ardmore Townhouses Rezone 25-03 a. Exhibit A - Zoning Map Changes
b. Exhibit B - Zoning Ordinance Changes

Attachment 1
Project Site

Attachment 2
ORDINANCE NO. 1170 N.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONING CODE AMENDMENT RZN 25-03 REGARDING UPDATES TO THE EL PASO DE ROBLES ZONING

CODE AND ZONING MAP
APPLICANT – COVELOP, INC. & MD3 INVESTMENTS
APN: 025-362-050
WHEREAS, Covelop, Inc. & MD3 Investments (“applicant”) have applied for a Zoning Code Amendment (“RZN 25-03) requesting an amendment to the Zoning Map and Zoning Code to revise the designation of the subject property to include the addition of a Mixed-Use (“MU”) Overlay and a Special Planned Development (“SPD”) Overlay (“Overlay K”); and
WHEREAS, the project site is a +/- 12.98-acre property located at 2930 Union Road, Lots 6 & 13 of APN 025-362-050; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the above request, the applicant has also applied for Planned Development 25-14, Modification 26-04, Conditional Use Permit 25-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 3255, and Oak Tree Removal 25-09, requesting approval of a 154-unit residential subdivision; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the City Council of the City of Paso Robles approved Resolution 25-124, authorizing a reservation of 154-units from the Cycle 2 Surplus Density Unit pool to be applied to this project site; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan designation is Commercial Service (CS) and the zoning designation is Commercial/ Light Industrial with a Planned Development Overlay and special district “F” overlay (C3-PD, District “F” Overlay); and
WHEREAS, as part of RZN 25-03, the applicant is requesting the site be rezoned to include the MU Overlay to allow residential uses by-right. The purpose of the MU Zoning Overlay zoning is to provide for locations appropriate for development of multi-family residential in nonresidential zoning districts, either in combination with commercial uses or as stand-alone residential development projects; and WHEREAS, as part of RZN 25-03, and in accordance with Section 21.11.050 of the Zoning Code, the applicant is also requesting SPD Zoning Overlay “K” be established to allow:
 Reduced setbacks including zero lot line development as part of the associated development plan; and
 Exceptions to the Special Planned Development Overlay “F” designation as outlined by PRMC Section 21.04.070, to eliminate the requirement for a solid wall adjacent to residentially zoned land.
 Minimum lot size, parking requirements, and common recreation amenities; and

Attachment 2
WHEREAS, RZN 25-03 requests consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Map to amend the zoning designation to include the “MU Overlay” and “SPD Overlay K”, as shown in Exhibit A, Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, RZN 25-03 requests consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Code that would apply special conditions to the property, through a new Section 21.04.120, as shown in Exhibit B, Zoning Code Text; and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2024, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (SCH No. 2023090132) (2024 MND) for a commercial/industrial project (“Covelop”) consisting of 240,000 square feet of floor area spanning six buildings for this project site (Planned Development 22-20, Conditional Use Permit 22-20, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 22-0054, Oak Tree Removal 23-09). As lead agency, and as part of the City’s due diligence, the City required a supplemental Noise Analysis, supplemental Arborist Report, and supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis to determine if the proposed Project would result in any new or more severe significant effects not identified in the original MND. Based on these studies, and a full analysis of the scope of the Project, and the previously adopted 2024 MND, none of the criteria specified in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring a subsequent or supplemental environmental document to be prepared is triggered. In particular, there have been no: (1) substantial changes in the project that will require major revisions to the previous MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effect; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effect; and (3) new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous MND was adopted that shows: (a) the Project would have significant effects not discussed in the previous MND; (b) the Project would have more severe environmental effects; or (4) mitigation measures previously found to be infeasible or new mitigation measures now exist and would be feasible and would reduce significant effects. Therefore, an addendum is the appropriate document under CEQA to analyze the consistency of the Project with the type and intensity of development previously analyzed for the site in the MND as provided for in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 and 15164; and
WHEREAS, on March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which it received a staff report, considered all public testimony, and reviewed the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code and Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider certifying an Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Rezone 25-03, Planned Development 25-14, Conditional Use Permit 25-05, Modification 26-04, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 3255, and Oak Tree Removal 25-09. On a vote of 5-0, the City Council approved the project in its entirety; and WHEREAS, also on April 21, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to introduce this ordinance for first reading to consider Rezone 25-03 for the project, which is required to be adopted by ordinance under the Paso Robles Municipal Code.

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Attachment 2
Section 1. Recitals. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Findings for Approval of RZN 25-03 to Establish a Zoning Map Amendment for the “MU-Overlay”. Based upon the facts and analysis presented in the staff report, public testimony received, and the record, and consistent with Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.10.070, the City Council finds that the proposed amendments to the Zoning Map are appropriate for the following reasons:

PRMC Section 21.10.070 Findings for Zoning Code and Zoning Map Amendments.

1. The rezone to include the MU-Overlay is consistent with the General Plan as it is consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy 1A, which is to “provide an appropriate mix and diversity of land uses” and Policy 2I, which is to “Encourage infill development as a means of accommodating growth while preserving open spaces areas, reducing vehicle miles travelled and enhancing livability/quality of live.”

2. The rezone to include the MU-Overlay will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, since the General Plan contemplates mixed use and infill opportunities within city limits. Further, concurrent with the request for the MU-Overlay is a development plan for the residential subdivision including a well-designed site plan, new roadways, pedestrian crossings, emergency access, site lighting, and other amenities that will complement the surrounding area.

3. The rezone to include the MU-Overlay is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this zoning code because other existing development standards will still apply, including the requirement for there to be an approved development plan that will establish setbacks, height, parking, etc. The MUOverlay simply allows residential uses in addition to the base zoning of C3 (Commercial/Light Industrial). Further, concurrent with the request for the MUOverlay is a request to adopt SPD Overlay K, which will set forth additional conditions for development at the site with a Development Plan.

4. Specific to the Zoning Map amendment, the affected site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, operating characteristics, shape, size, topography; is suitable in terms of the provision of public and emergency vehicle access and public services and utilities; and is served by highways and streets adequate in width and improvement to carry the kind and quantity of traffic the proposed use would likely generate to ensure that the proposed use(s) and/or development will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the property is located, which was thoroughly studies as part of environmental and technical studies performed for the project, including noise, traffic, air quality, biological, and cultural resources, which demonstrate that impacts will be less than significant with standard mitigation measures. The design promotes general welfare through thoughtful housing, neighborhood amenities, and streetscape improvements. The project

Attachment 2
includes a well-designed site plan, new roadways, pedestrian crossings, emergency access, site lighting, utility access, and other amenities that ensure site compatibility with the proposed use and will complement the surrounding area.

Section 3. Findings for Approval of RZN 25-03 to Establish a Zoning Map and Zoning Code Amendment for “SPD Overlay K”. Based upon the facts and analysis presented in the staff report, public testimony received, and the record, and consistent with Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.10.070 and Section 21.11.060, the City Council finds that the proposed amendments to the Zoning Map and Zoning Code (Title 21 of the City Municipal Code) are appropriate for the following reasons:

PRMC Section 21.10.070 Findings for Zoning Code and Zoning Map Amendments.

1. The rezone to include the SPD Overlay “K” is consistent with the General Plan as it is consistent with General Plan Land Use Element which allows for “innovation and flexibility in the design of residential… developments” especially when “(a)pproval of a planned development can allow modification of certain development standards if it results in better design or greater public benefit.” SPD Overlay K will allow modification of certain development standards for both commercial and residential uses through a development plan.

2. The rezone to include the SPD Overlay K will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, since General Plan Land Use policy LU-2D recognizes “attractive streetscapes, a pedestrian friendly setting, and coordinated site design, architecture, and amenities” as a means to “create livable, vibrant neighborhoods”. The modifications being incorporated into SPD Overlay K are necessary to allow zero-lot line development as part of the design of the project, which results in a thoughtfully designed for-sale townhome style development that includes neighborhood amenities such as open spaces, a tot lot, and clubhouse, and streetscape improvements. The removal of a masonry wall along the south side of the development is not injurious to adjacent parcels, since the requirement was set in place in the event the site is constructed with a commercial land use.

3. The rezone to include the SPD Overlay K is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this zoning code because other existing development standards will still apply, including the requirement for there to be an approved development plan that will establish site planning design, building height, required onsite parking, architectural review, etc. Further, concurrent with the request for the SPD Overlay K is a request to rezone the site to include the MUOverlay, which permits mixed-use projects to allow residential uses in addition to the base zoning of C3 (Commercial/Light Industrial).

4. Specific to the Zoning Map amendment, the affected site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, operating characteristics, shape, size, topography; is suitable in terms of the provision of public and emergency vehicle access and public services and utilities; and is served by highways and streets adequate in

Attachment 2
width and improvement to carry the kind and quantity of traffic the proposed use would likely generate to ensure that the proposed use(s) and/or development will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the property is located. The proposed project was thoroughly studied as part of environmental and technical studies performed for the project, including noise, traffic, air quality, biological, and cultural resources, which demonstrate that impacts will be less than significant with standard mitigation measures. The design promotes general welfare through thoughtful housing, neighborhood amenities, and streetscape improvements.

The project includes a well-designed site plan, new roadways, pedestrian crossings, emergency access, site lighting, utility access, and other amenities that ensure site compatibility with the proposed use and will complement the surrounding area.

PRMC Section 21.11.060 Findings
A. Consistency. The proposed special planned development is consistent with the goals and policies established by the general plan, particularly the purpose of the applicable land use category, because the SPD overlay and created modifications encourages compact, infill development and well-designed residential neighborhoods, which are consistent with Paso Robles General Plan Policy 2I, which is to “Encourage infill development as a means of accommodating growth while preserving open spaces areas, reducing vehicle miles travelled and enhancing livability/quality of live.” The project advances the City’s housing objectives by providing attainable housing that is affordable by design, with smaller lots and attached townhomes, while offering convenient access to jobs, services, and transit. The SPD overlay also allows flexibility to achieve these goals while maintaining consistency with the City’s General Plan, Housing Element and Economic Development Strategic Plan.

B. Design or Public Benefit. The proposed special planned development will result in better, more creative, and higher quality architectural and site development design or greater public benefit than would otherwise be allowed under adopted development standards, because it allows the project to be designed specifically with zero-lot line setbacks, enabling the townhome configuration proposed by the project which is not otherwise achieved under the base zoning development standards.

C. Compatibility. The proposed special planned development is compatible with surrounding development, since the site abuts residential zoning to the south, which under the base C-3 zoning could result in incompatible uses; however, with the proposed residential development, the project aligns with adjacent neighborhoods and creates a well-thought transition point from the other surrounding commercial uses to the west. The project also supports removal of the SPD Overlay “F” wall requirement which was intended to establish a solid, decorative masonry wall between commercial/industrial projects under C-3 zoning and the adjacent residential to the south. By establishing the residential use, the solid masonry wall is no longer necessary.

Attachment 2
D. Sensitive to Topography and Natural Resources. The proposed special planned development is sensitive to the natural topography of the site, minimizes alterations to the land, and maintains and enhances significant natural resources, since there is an associated development plan that includes a well-thought grading plan which has been designed to work with existing landforms where feasible, and retaining walls are located in specific, functionally necessary locations to accommodate slope conditions and support required drainage features and development. Only oak trees identified as safety hazards and in poor condition are proposed for removal, with arborist review supporting their removal. The remaining oak tree will be preserved with appropriate protection measures, and mitigation plantings are included in the landscape plan to ensure compliance with the City’s Oak Tree Ordinance.

E. Circulation. The proposed special planned development's vehicular, bikeway, and pedestrian circulation system is designed to be efficient and well-integrated with the overall city circulation system, because as proposed, there will be a new vehicular access point via a new east-west extension of Ardmore Road, with internal private roads connecting all residences, the clubhouse, and guest parking, meeting the City’s minimum 20-foot width and 150-foot maximum hose pull requirements. Pedestrian circulation is continuous and accessible, linking all buildings, open spaces, and parking areas, with sidewalks along internal roads, the Ardmore Road extension, and landscaped pathways.

F. General Welfare. The proposed special planned development does not pose adverse impacts on the public health, safety, and general welfare, nor on neighboring properties in particular, as determined by relying on environmental and technical studies, including noise, traffic, air quality, biological, and cultural resources, which demonstrate that impacts will be less than significant with standard mitigation measures. The design promotes general welfare through thoughtful housing, neighborhood amenities, and streetscape improvements.

Section 4. Findings on the Necessity for a Subsequent or Supplemental MND or EIR. Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to, the 2024 MND, the Addendum, and all related information presented to the City Council, the City Council finds that the Project necessitates only minor modifications to the 2024 MND.

Therefore, pursuant to State CEQA section 15164, an Addendum to the 2024 MND is the appropriate document for the Project.

The City Council further finds that the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental MND or EIR is not required for the Project because the Project:

A. will not result in substantial changes that would require major revisions of the 2024 MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
B. will not result in substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is developed that would require major revisions of the 2024 MND due to the involvement of new

Attachment 2
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; and
C. does not present new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2024 MND documents were certified showing any of the following:
(i) the Project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the 2024 MND; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the 2024 MND;
(iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the lead agency declined to adopt such measures; and
(iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the lead agency declined to adopt.

Section 5. Findings on Environmental Impacts. Having considered the Addendum, the administrative record, the 2024 MND and all written and oral evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council finds that all environmental impacts of the Project have been addressed within the 2024 MND and the Addendum. The City Council finds that no new or additional mitigation measures are required. The City Council further finds that there is no substantial evidence in the administrative record supporting a fair argument that the Project may result in any significant environmental impacts beyond those analyzed in the 2024 MND. The City Council finds that the Addendum contains a complete, objective, and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project and reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council.

Section 6. Approval. The City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles, based on its independent judgment and analysis, adopts RZN 25-03, as depicted in Exhibit A and Exhibit B of this Ordinance, incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 7. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City of El Paso de Robles Community Development Department, 1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446. The custodian of the record is the City Clerk.

Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 21, 2026, for first reading by the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles, and adopted on the 5 th day of May, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Attachment 2
ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Martin, City Clerk
Exhibit A – Mixed Use Overlay and Special Planned Development Overlay K - Zoning Map Amendments Exhibit B – Special Planned Development Overlay “K” - Zoning Code Text Amendment

EXHIBIT A

PROPOSED ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
Proposed MU-Overlay
and Special Planned
Development Overlay “K”

EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED TITLE 21 ZONING CODE TEXT

AMENDMENT
Added text is shown as blue underline and deleted text is shown as red strikethrough.

SECTION 21.04.120 – Reserved Special Planned Development Overlay K Section 21.04.120 to read as follows:

Special Planned Development Overlay K applies to the +/- 12.98-acre property located at 2930 Union Road, Lots 6 and 13 (originally recorded as part of the Golden Hills Orchard Tract Map in 1919 via Map Book 002-050-001) of APN 025-362-050, as designated on the official Zoning Map and conditioned by Ordinance No. XXXX N.S. as follows:

A. Property setbacks may allow for varying reduced front, side, and rear setbacks, including zerofoot setbacks in instances where townhomes feature shared walls along zero-lot lines or alleyloaded designs with zero-foot front setbacks, as part of a Development Plan.

B. The requirement for the construction of a solid wall of decorative masonry materials, as outlined in Section 21.04.070 as “Special Planned Development Overlay “F”, to be located along the southern portion of the project site abutting residentially zoned land is no longer required when accompanied by a residential project and as part of a Development Plan.

C. Minimum residential lot size 1,563 sq. ft.

D. Parking requirement
a. Minimum 282 garage spaces and 90 driveway spaces totaling 372 spaces b. Shared / guest parking requirement 33 spaces
E. Common recreational amenity minimums
a. Clubhouse building minimum 3,019 sq. ft.
b. Outdoor covered patio minimum 1,177 sq. ft
c. Outdoor pool minimum 711 sq. ft.
d. Playground/tot-lot featuring minimum 15 play equipment features e. Shared/common waste enclosures minimum 8

Council Agenda Report
From: Leslie Frazier, City Engineer/Deputy Director of Community Development Subject: Approval of Final Map Tract 3153-5 For Recordation, Vinedo Planning Area 5 CEQA Determination: The City finds that a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously prepared for the Olsen South Chandler Specific Plan. Acceptance of a final map does not require additional review under CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162 and 15182.

Date: May 5, 2026
Facts

1. The Olsen South Chandler Specific Plan (SP) (also referred to as “Vinedo”) was approved by the City Council on February 20, 2020. The intent of the SP is to serve as a comprehensive guide to development of the 358-acre, 1,293 residential unit specific plan area, located on the southeast side of the City, adjacent to unincorporated San Luis Obispo County land.

2. Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 3152 was approved as part of the SP approvals. VTTM 3152 subdivided the various planning areas to accommodate the 1,293 planned residential units.

3. Planning Area 5 (PA-5) was included in VTTM 3152, Lot E, which approved 86 single-family residential lots.

4. Brookfield Holdings (Mirabella)/K. Hovnanian have submitted a signed Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) and valid Financial Assurances to guarantee construction of Public Improvements required by the City Council Resolution 20-032.

5. The formation of Community Facility Districts for services and facilities is required in connection with this project, and the Community Facility Districts have already been established accordingly. As such, the new lots created by this map will be subject to these Community Facility Districts.

6. The City Engineer reviewed the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map 3152, and associated documents, to determine compliance with the same. The City Engineer is recommending approval of Final Tract Map 3153-5 for recordation based on the Project’s compliance with the Conditions of Approval.

7. The City Attorney has reviewed the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Financial Assurances, Covenant and Deed Restriction, CCRs, and HOA document, and has determined that they are satisfactory.

8. As required by the Olsen South Chandler Specific Plan and associated Conditions of Approval, the project includes dedication of Lot 239 (Water Booster Station Lot) for construction of a water booster pump station to serve the Vinedo development. The improvements will be accepted by the City upon satisfactory completion of the booster pump station to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Utilities Department.

9. The Acting City Surveyor reviewed Final Map 3153-5 and has determined that the Map complies with the applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and has determined that the Map is Technically Correct.

Options

1. Approve Final Map Tract 3153-5 and direct the City Clerk to indicate Council’s approval on the map; Direct the City Manager to sign a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the applicant, subject to any minor revisions by the City Attorney; and direct the City Engineer to record the Final Map 3153-5 and required agreements, documents, and easements; and take any other ancillary actions necessary to effectuate the contemplated approvals.

2. Refer the Final Map 3153-5 back to staff with specific directions for further consideration.

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
Planning Area 5 is part of the Olsen South Chandler Specific Plan, as shown on Attachment 1. Final Map 3153-5 subdivides Planning Area 5 and is included as Exhibit A. The Final Map subdivides one parcel into 90 lots consisting of 86 single-family residential lots, one booster station lot, one private road lot and, two common area lots. The Applicant is requesting that Final Map 3153-5 be recorded so they can move forward with housing construction.

The Applicant must demonstrate compliance with the project’s conditions of approval to record the Final Map. The conditions of approval include construction of water, recycled water, and sewer improvements, and submittal of CC&R and future Homeowners Association documents.

The City Engineer and City Surveyor have reviewed the Final Map and have determined that it is technically correct and ready to record pending the following:

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
The Applicant is required to install water, recycled water, sewer, tract, and frontage improvements as part of the conditions of approval. The Applicant is requesting that they be allowed to sign a Subdivision Improvement Agreement in lieu of installing the improvements prior to Final Map recordation. This is allowed per City Code and the Subdivision Map Act. The Applicant has reviewed the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and agrees with the terms. The Applicant-signed Subdivision Improvement Agreement is included as Exhibit B in Attachments. The City Attorney has reviewed the bonds and determined they meet the City’s Municipal Code Requirements.

Community Facilities District
Community Facilities Districts (CFD) 2022-1N (Facilities) and 2022-2N (Services) were formed in August 2022. The parcel being subdivided was included in these CFD areas; therefore, the new parcels will automatically be subject to the requirements of each CFD. Community Services District 2022-1N is established to pay for backbone infrastructure improvements (e.g., roads, water, sewer) that will serve the entire project. Community Facilities District 2022-2N is established to pay for maintenance of services including roads, parks, open space, public safety, and community services.

Deed Restriction and Covenant
A Deed Restriction and Covenant will be recorded to ensure common lot restrictions remain in place and binding on future owners. The recorded document will provide public notice and ensure ongoing compliance with the approved conditions of use.

Booster Pump Station
The Olsen South Chandler Specific Plan requires construction of a water booster pump station to provide

adequate water pressure and system reliability for the Vinedo development. In accordance with the Specific Plan and Conditions of Approval, the Grant Deed document conveys the property to the City and is included as Exhibit D. The master developer will construct the booster pump station and associated improvements in accordance with City standards and approved plans. Upon satisfactory completion of the improvements and confirmation by the City Engineer and Utilities Department that the facilities comply with approved plans and City standards, the booster pump station parcel and improvements will be accepted by the City and incorporated into the municipal water system.

Fiscal Impact
There is no direct fiscal impact resulting from Final Map Tract 3153-5 recordation. The Map’s long term fiscal impact to City services are offset by the property leases, community facilities district taxes and fees for services.

CEQA
A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously prepared for the Olsen South Chandler Specific Plan. The proposed Final Tract Map and associated ancillary action do not involve any substantial changes or new environment effects; therefore, no additional environmental review under CEQA is required pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162 and 15182.

Recommendation (Option 1)

1. Approve Resolution 26-XXX which:

A. Approves Final Tract Map 3153-5 and directs the City Clerk to state the Council’s approval on the Final Map.

B. Accepts the Offers of Dedication to the terms of Offer of Dedication by the parties having a record interest in said land.

C. Authorizes entering into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement, directing the City Manager to sign the Subdivision Improvement Agreement set forth in substantially final form, and authorizing the City Attorney to make any minor or non-substantive changes in furtherance of the Council’s intent.

D. Accept the Deed Restriction and Covenant.

E. Accept the Grant Deed for the Booster Pump Station offered to the City by the parties having a record interest in said land.

2. Direct the City Engineer to record all documents required by the Conditions of Approval.

Attachments

1. Planning Area Map - Olsen South Chandler Project

2. Resolution 26-XXX - Acceptance of Final Map 3153-5
a. Exhibit A – Final Tract Map 3153-5
b. Exhibit B – Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Bonds Attached c. Exhibit C – Deed Restriction and Covenant Document
d. Exhibit D – Signed Grant Deed

Attachment 1

PLANNING AREA MAP
OLSEN SOUTH CHANDLER PROJECT Page 181 of 324 City Council Agenda May 5, 2026 Attachment 2
RESOLUTION 26-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES ACCEPTING AND APPROVING FINAL MAP TRACT 3153-5 FOR RECORDATION, AND APPROVING

THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR VINEDO – OLSEN SOUTH CHANDLER SPECIFIC PLAN – PLANNING AREA 5 APPLICANT – Brookfield Holdings (Mirabella) / K. Hovnanian WHEREAS, the Olsen South Chandler Specific Plan (SP) was approved by the City Council on February 20, 2020. The intent of the SP is to serve as a comprehensive guide to development of the 358-acre,1,293 residential unit specific plan, located on the southeast side of the City, adjacent to the unincorporated San Luis Obispo County land; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing and approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 3154 on February 20, 2020 by adopting City Council Resolution 20-032; and WHEREAS, applicant Brookfield Holdings (Mirabella) / K. Hovnanian (developer) is requesting that the Final Map for Tract 3153-5 be approved and accepted by the City Council for recordation; and
WHEREAS, the Map is a request to subdivide Planning Area 5 into 90 lots consisting of 86 singlefamily residential lots, one booster pump station lot, one private road lot and two common area lots (Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, the developer is requesting that the City enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the public improvements and monumentation required in connection with this project, which is authorized pursuant to the Paso Robles Municipal Code and state Subdivision Map Act, and has provided related financial assurances; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a signed Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Exhibit B) and has submitted bonds as the financial assurances; and WHEREAS, the Grant Deed has been executed by the Grantor and provided to the City for acceptance and recordation; and
WHEREAS, all conditions of approval for this subdivision, as defined in City Council Resolution 20-032, have been satisfied by the applicant for the Map; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer and Acting City Surveyor have reviewed the final tract map and find that it is in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and Conditions of Approval, and is technically correct.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Attachment 2
Section 1. All the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Based on the facts and analysis presented to it, including all written and oral testimony and staff presentations, the City Council hereby finds that Final Tract Map 3153-5 is in conformity with Title 22, “Subdivisions,” of the Paso Robles Municipal Code. The City Council hereby accepts and approves the Final Map as shown on Exhibit A and authorizes Final Map execution and recordation, subject to the Conditions of Approval in City Council Resolution 20-032.

Section 3. The City Council hereby accepts the Offers of Dedication for public utilities, nonexclusive public access, drainage, storm drain, water, and sewer easement purposes by the parties having a record interest in said land, as shown on the Final Map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 4. The City Council hereby directs the City Manager to sign the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference, subject to any minor modifications approved by the City Attorney to correct any non-substantive errors in the documents.

Section 5. The City Council hereby accepts the Deed Restriction and Covenant as shown on Exhibit C.

Section 6. The City Council hereby accepts the Grant Deed as shown on Exhibit D.

Section 7. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, to take any additional ancillary actions necessary to ensure all associated documents are executed consistent with the City Council’s approval of the Final Map for Tract 3153-5 and City-required documents.

Section 8. The City Council directs the City Engineer to record all documents as required by the conditions of approval of City Council Resolution 20-032 and otherwise required to effectuate this Resolution consistent with the City Council’s approval of the Final Map for Tract 3153-5and City-required documents.

Section 9. A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously prepared for the Olsen South Chandler Specific Plan. The City Council finds the proposed Final Tract Map and associated ancillary action do not involve any substantial changes or new environment effects that were not previously assessed by the EIR; therefore, no additional environmental review under CEQA is required pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162 and 15182.

APPROVED by the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles by the following vote on May 5, 2026.

Attachment 2
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Martin, City Clerk
Exhibit A – Final Tract Map 3153-5
Exhibit B – Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Bonds Attached Exhibit C – Deed Restriction and Covenant Document
Exhibit D – Signed Grant Deed

Exhibit A

Exhibit A

Exhibit A

Exhibit A

Exhibit A

Exhibit A

Exhibit A

Exhibit A

RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
ATTN: City Clerk
(Exempt from Filing Fees - Government Code§ 27383
& 27388.1 (a)(2)(D))

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
824 73 .03062\44683825.2

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT

FOR COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
TRACT MAP NO. 3153-5
between

THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
a California municipal corporation
and
K. HOVNANIAN COMMUNITIES, INC.,
a California corporation
Exhibit B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit
B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit B

Exhibit
C

Exhibit
C

Exhibit
C

Exhibit
C

Order No.

Escrow No.

Loan No.

RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY ENGINEER

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
1000 SPRING STREET
PASO ROBLES, CA 93446
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

Grantee
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:

Grantee
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX$ __ _
__ Computed on the consideration or value of property
conveyed, OR
__ Computed on the consideration or value less liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale.

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
Signature of Declarant or Agent determining tax - Firm
Name

GRANT DEED
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Brookfield Holdings (Mirabella), LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ("Grantor"), hereby grants to the City of El Paso de Robles ("Grantee"), the real property in the City of El Paso de Robles, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, described in the Legal Description attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A ("Property").

THE REAL PROPERTY CONVEYED HEREIN BY GRANTOR TO GRANTEE IS CONVEYED AND ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO: (i) ALL MATTERS OF RECORD, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD, AND/OR DISCLOSED BY AN INSPECTION.

This grant is also subject to the covenants and agreements described in attached Exhibit "A".

Date: t-// i7 / 7v7, .. e;,
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
same as above
Brookfield Holdings (Mirabella), LLC,
a Delaware
<=::-
limited liahlty co!:1:lPany --
By: .,:::::::::z -___->
Name: ·J?v JT\f W&A-TH& r6 'I
Its: /\vn4Q�3:t,Cl".) SD...,,Vl'\�'f
Tract 3153-5, City Deed for Lot 239
03/27/2026 v2
Exhibit D

Exhibit
D

Exhibit
D

Council Agenda Report
From: Elizabeth Hull, City Attorney
Subject: Adoption of a Meeting Disruption Policy in Compliance with SB707 CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: May 5, 2026
Facts

1. The Ralph M. Brown Act requires that, with limited exceptions, all meetings of a legislative body of a local agency be open and public and that all persons be permitted to attend and participate.

2. On October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 707 (SB 707), which amends the Brown Act with the intent to diversify and increase public engagement during local government meetings of legislative bodies.

3. At the regular Council meeting on February 3, 2026 Council was provided with a presentation of the Brown Act Updates. Among the various new requirements under SB 707, all qualified legislative bodies must now offer hybrid meetings through a two-way phone or video platform. Paso Robles City Council meetings are already, and will continue to be, conducted in a hybrid format utilizing a YouTube live stream and allowing for two-way phone participation via Call-In Studio.

4. In addition, SB 707 requires the City to formally adopt a policy, on or before July 1, 2026, that outlines the procedures for recessing and reconvening a meeting in the event of disruption and the efforts that the City Council and staff shall make to attempt to restore the service.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Approve the City of Paso Robles Meeting Disruption Policy as presented;

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
Prior to July 1, 2026, the City Council must adopt, at a noticed public hearing, a policy addressing disruptions to telephonic or internet service during public meetings. This policy must outline the procedures for recessing and reconvening a meeting in the event of such a disruption, as well as the steps City staff will take to attempt to restore service. If a service failure prevents the public from participating, the meeting must be recessed while staff makes a good-faith effort to restore connectivity. The City Council may meet in closed session during this time. If service cannot be restored after at least one hour of reasonable effort, the City Council must, by roll-call vote, make a finding that good-faith efforts were made in accordance with the adopted policy and that the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in maintaining remote public access.

Staff has prepared the Meeting Disruption Policy (Attachment 1) to meet this new State requirement. The policy mirrors the procedures outlined in SB 707, which require a recess of at least one hour to attempt to restore service.

Adopting the Meeting Disruption Policy ensures compliance with Senate Bill 707 and reinforces the City’s commitment to transparency and public access. The policy establishes clear, consistent procedures for addressing unexpected telephonic or internet disruptions, reducing confusion during meetings and helping to protect the public’s right to participate.

Fiscal Impact
Adoption of the Meeting Disruption Policy has no fiscal impact.

CEQA
The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Recommendation
Adopt the City of Paso Robles Meeting Disruption Policy Attachments

1. Draft City of Paso Robles Meeting Disruption Policy

Attachment 1
Adopted by City Council on Month ##, YYYY Page 1 of 4

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES PUBLIC MEETING DISRUPTION POLICY

DISRUPTION OF TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET SERVICE DURING MEETINGS

1. BACKGROUND
Senate Bill 707 (2025) amended the Brown Act to require eligible legislative bodies to adopt, on or before July 1, 2026, a policy addressing how the agency will respond to disruptions in telephonic or internet service that prevent members of the public from participating remotely.

2. PURPOSE
This policy establishes procedures for responding to a disruption in the telephonic or internet services that provide two-way remote public access to meetings of the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles, as required by the Brown Act (Government Code section 54953.4). The policy ensures transparency, public participation, and the continuation of meetings during technological disruptions.

3. DEFINITIONS
“Service Disruption” means any failure, outage, or other interruption to the agency’s remote access services that prevents members of the public from participating in a City Council meeting through the remote access service.
“Disrupting” means engaging in behavior during a meeting of the City Council that actually disrupts, disturbs, impedes, or renders infeasible the orderly conduct of the meeting and includes, but is not limited to one of the following:
a. A failure to comply with reasonable and lawful regulations adopted by the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles.
b. Engaging in behavior that constitutes use of force or a true threat of force. “Remote access services” means the two-way telephonic service and/or two-way audiovisual platform used to provide real-time remote public attendance and observation of meetings. “Two-way audiovisual platform” means an online platform that provides participants with the ability to participate in a meeting via both an interactive video conference and a two-way telephonic service. “Two-way telephonic service” means a telephone service that does not require internet access and allows participants to dial a telephone number to listen and verbally participate. “True threat of force” means a threat that has sufficient indicia of intent and seriousness, that a reasonable observer would perceive it to be an actual threat to use force by the person making the threat.

Attachment 1
Adopted by City Council on Month ##, YYYY Page 2 of 4

1. APPLICABILITY
This policy applies to all open and public meetings of the City of Paso Robles at which remote public participation is required under the Brown Act. Consistent with the Brown Act, this policy shall not apply to the following meetings:
a. Meetings held to attend a judicial or administrative proceeding to which the City of El Paso de Robles is a party.
b. Meetings held to inspect real or personal property provided that the topic of the meeting is limited to items directly related to the real or personal property. c. Meetings held to meet with elected or appointed officials of the United States or the State of California, solely to discuss a legislative or regulatory issue affecting the City of El Paso de Robles and over which the federal or state officials have jurisdiction. d. Meetings held to meet in or nearby a facility owned by the City of El Paso de Robles, provided that the topic of the meeting is limited to items directly related to the facility. e. Meetings held in an emergency situation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.5.

2. REMOTE PUBLIC ACCESS GENERALLY
When remote public access is required under the Brown Act, the City Council shall provide members of the public with an opportunity to attend and participate in the meeting using a two-way audiovisual platform or a two-way telephonic service, provided that adequate telephonic or internet service is operational at the meeting location.

If adequate telephonic or internet service is not operational at the meeting location, the City of El Paso de Robles shall not be required to provide remote access. If adequate telephonic or internet service is operational for only a portion of the meeting, the [Legislative Body] shall provide remote access during that portion of the meeting.

If a two-way audiovisual platform is used, the City of El Paso de Robles shall:
a. Publicly post and provide a call-in option as well; and b. Activate any automatic captioning function that is available in the audiovisual platform.

If a two-way audiovisual platform is not provided, the City of El Paso de Robles shall provide a two-way telephonic service.

Members of the public participating remotely shall be provided the same opportunity to provide public comment as members of the public attending in person, including the same time allotment.

3. RESPONSE TO SERVICE DISRUPTION
If the Mayor or the City Clerk becomes aware of a service disruption:
a. The Mayor or City Clerk shall immediately announce the service disruption to the public.

Attachment 1
Adopted by City Council on Month ##, YYYY Page 3 of 4
b. The Mayor shall call for a recess of the open session and may convene the legislative body in an authorized closed session, consistent with the Brown Act. The recess shall last for one hour or until service is restored, whichever is earlier.
c. During the recess, staff of the City staff shall make a good faith effort to diagnose and restore the disrupted service.

4. RECONVENING THE OPEN SESSION
After the expiration of the hour, if service has not been restored, the Mayor or City Clerk shall report on the status of staff’s efforts to restore remote access services, and the City Council may reconvene to:
a. Adjourn the meeting;
b. Extend the recess to allow staff more time to make a good faith effort to restore remote access services; or
c. Continue the open session portion of the meeting by adopting, by roll call vote, the following or a substantially similar finding:
“The City of El Paso de Robles has made good faith efforts to restore telephonic or internet service in accordance with its adopted policy, and the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote public access.”
Upon adoption of the finding, the City Council may continue the open session portion of the meeting despite the fact that remote access services have not been restored.

5. RECORDKEEPING
The Clerk Clerk shall enter a brief statement into the meeting minutes, including:
 The nature and time of the service disruption;
 The time the meeting was reconvened (if applicable);
 Any finding adopted pursuant to Section 7.

6. RESPONSE TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC DISRUPTING A MEETING If the Mayor or City Clerk becomes aware of a member of the public who is attending the meeting through remote access services and is disrupting the meeting or otherwise preventing other members of the public from attending or observing the meeting remotely or in-person:
a. The Mayor or City Clerk shall warn the person who is participating through remote access services that he or she is disrupting the meeting and his or her failure to cease that behavior may result in his or her removal.
b. If the person to whom the Mayor gave the above warning persists in disrupting the meeting, the Mayor shall order staff to:

Attachment 1
Adopted by City Council on Month ##, YYYY Page 4 of 4
i. mute or otherwise limit the individual’s ability to disrupt the meeting, while allowing the individual to continue to observe and attend the meeting; or ii. remove the individual from the meeting if paragraph (a) does not address the disrupting behavior or is not available using the remote access service.

7. REVIEW AND UPDATES
This policy may be amended by the City Council at a noticed public meeting in open session and may not be placed on the consent calendar.

Council Agenda Report
From: Piper Smith, Assistant Planner
Subject: Introduction for First Reading by Title Only an Ordinance to Amend Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.69.120, Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts; Chapter 21.20, Temporary Use Permits; Table 21.32-1, Zoning District Use Regulations; Section 21.91.070, “F” Definitions; and Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan Table 5.3-1, Allowed Land Uses and Permitting Requirements.

CEQA Determination: The proposed ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA.

State CEQA Guidelines §15060(c) provides that “[a]n activity is not subject to CEQA if … the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378” and, alternatively, is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

Date: May 5, 2026
Facts

1. On October 1, 2024, City Council approved a variety of updates to the Paso Robles Zoning Code, Title 21 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code (PRMC), including updates to PRMC Section 21.69.120, “Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts.” This section of the municipal code establishes the permit requirements and operational standards for food trucks operating within the City limits. The rules codified staff policy on food trucks that had existed since 2019.

2. All food trucks are required to comply with the operational requirements of Section 21.69.120, have a valid City business license, and have an active County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Heath Permit.

3. In addition to the above requirements, food trucks operating at one location for more than seven days in a calendar year are required to obtain a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) and must meet the findings provided in PRMC Section 21.20.070, “Findings for Approval and Revocation” of Temporary Use Permits.

4. On August 5, 2025, City Council discussed a ‘Legislative Update and Review Regarding Food Truck Regulations.’ Staff presented the current permitting process as well as some of the challenges in enforcing the food truck standards and permitting requirements due to ambiguity in the municipal code. Members of the public were invited to participate in the discussion and provided feedback.

5. The City Council voted to establish an Ad Hoc Committee of the City Council to be comprised of Councilmember Gregory and Councilmember Bausch to address food truck regulations and report back to City Council within six months with recommendations for future action based on the discussion.

6. The first Food Truck Regulation Review City Council Ad Hoc Committee meeting was held on September 22, 2025. The priority of the meeting was to gather more in-depth feedback from the

public. The meeting had a high level of participation from the public. Ad hoc committee members directed staff to collect additional information on the following topics:
a. Generators that can meet Noise Ordinance requirements, b. Comparison of the current food truck policies listed on the City’s website and the standards in the Zoning Ordinance,
c. Clarification on Fire inspection requirements,
d. Additional information on complaints received by the City regarding food trucks, e. Policies and options for food trucks utilizing tables, chairs, and shade structures, and f. Clarification of how the 7-day rule applies to food trucks hired to serve food at special events (not operated by the City).

7. The second Food Truck Regulation Review City Council Ad Hoc Committee meeting was held on November 12, 2025. The priority of the meeting was to report back on topics brought to light at the first ad hoc meeting. This included details of previous food truck complaints, providing clear and concise rules that align with other departments’ requirements, and additional information on fire department inspections. Staff also provided draft recommendations to gather feedback from the Ad Hoc Committee members and from the public. Ad hoc committee members made recommendations for the following topics:
a. Generator Noise,
b. Accessory Furniture,
c. Temporary Use Permit permitting requirements,
d. Setbacks, and
e. Proximity to Downtown.

8. On December 16, 2025, Staff reported the findings and recommendations made at the second Food Truck Regulation Review City Council Ad Hoc Committee back to City Council for review and formal recommendations. City Council provided specific direction to staff regarding operational requirements effective immediately:
a. Food trucks will utilize generator acoustic panels to protect adjacent land uses and the public right-of-way from excessive noise and to comply with the Noise Ordinance. b. Accessory furniture is not permitted:
i. In the public right of way (e.g., sidewalk or parkways), or ii. Where it will obstruct circulation, ingress, or egress c. The following accessory furniture is permitted:
i. 1 shade structure, no more than 120 square feet in size; and ii. Table(s) totaling no more than 24 square feet in size; and iii. 8 chairs
d. Require a minimum setback of 9 feet (half the length of an uncovered parking space) for food trucks with service windows facing the public right-of-way. No setback is required for food truck service window facing internally into the commercial lot. Shade canopies, tables, and chairs are allowed within the food truck setback. Allow the Zoning Administrator to increase or decrease setback requirements for individual Temporary Use Permits to account for unique site configurations.
e. Temporary Use Permits will not be granted on private property within 100 feet of City Park.

9. The City Council also recommended an amendment to PRMC Section 21.69.120 to:
a. Require a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) for ALL food trucks operating in the City and vending to the public. Exception - food trucks operating as a caterer for a special event are not required to have a TUP, and;

b. Require on-site commercial businesses hosting more than 7 special events that include a food truck in a year to obtain a Temporary Use Permit.

10. On April 14, 2026, on a vote of 5-0, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC 26-022 to recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Rezone 25-08 to amend Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts), Chapter 21.20 (Temporary Use Permits), Table 21.32-1 (Zoning District Use Regulations), and Section 21.91.070 (“F” Definitions); and Specific Plan Amendment 26-02 to amend Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan (UTCSP) Table 5.3- 1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permitting Requirements), based on findings.

11. The proposed ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA. State CEQA Guidelines §15060(c) provides that “[a]n activity is not subject to CEQA if … the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378” and, alternatively, is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

Community Outreach
The following list details the outreach efforts that were made to notify the public of changes to food truck regulations:
 August 5, 2025, City Council discussion of Legislative Update and Review Regarding Food Truck Regulations
 Bilingual updates to the City website at www.prcity.com/foodtrucks  Food-truck specific messaging on the public information kiosk in the lobby of City Hall  Creation of bilingual informational flyers regarding food truck regulations and policies  Creation of a “Notify Me” list for email updates about Food Trucks  September 11, 2025 staff presentation to the Paso Robles Hispanic Business Association  Establishment of the Food Truck Ad Hoc Committee, which held public meetings on September 22, 2025 and November 12, 2025.
 City Council discussion of the Food Truck Ad Hoc Committee recommendations on December 16, 2025.
 April 14, 2026 Planning Commission public hearing regarding this Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment.

Options

1. Take no action, which will leave the existing Zoning Ordinance and Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan unchanged;

2. Introduce for first reading, by title only, Ordinance XXXX to approve Rezone 25-08 to amending Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts), Chapter 21.20 (Temporary Use Permits), Table 21.32-1 (Zoning District Use Regulations), and Section 21.91.070 (“F” Definitions); and Specific Plan Amendment 26-02 amending Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan Table

5.3-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permitting Requirements), based on findings.

3. Introduce for first reading, by title only, a modified version of Ordinance XXXX to approve Rezone 25- 08 and Specific Plan Amendment 26-02.

4. Refer the project back to the Planning Commission or staff for additional analysis.

Analysis and Conclusions
In the summer of 2025, the City received a number of complaints about food trucks, which in some cases were operating without complying with the City’s existing food truck regulations. Code Enforcement on food trucks was subsequently increased, causing frustration among food truck operators. The City Council reviewed food truck policy and created a Food Truck Regulation Ad Hoc Committee at their August 5, 2025 meeting.

The first Food Truck Regulation Ad Hoc Committee meeting was held on September 12, 2025 and focused on outlining the existing permit requirements and operational standards as well as receiving feedback from the public. The second meeting was held November 12, 2025 and focused on reviewing draft recommendations based on the feedback from the first meeting and additional staff analysis. Spanish translation services were provided at both ad hoc committee meetings. No changes were made to the food truck regulations after either of the ad hoc committee meetings.

Updated Operational Requirements for Food Trucks
At their December 16, 2025 meeting, the City Council provided specific direction to staff regarding 5 operational requirements effective immediately:
a. Food trucks will utilize generator acoustic panels to protect adjacent land uses and the public right-of-way from excessive noise and to comply with the Noise Ordinance. b. Accessory furniture is not permitted:
i. In the public right of way (e.g., sidewalk or parkways), and ii. Where it will obstruct circulation, ingress, or egress. c. The following accessory furniture is permitted:
i. 1 shade structure, no more than 120 square feet in size; ii. Table(s) totaling no more than 24 square feet in size; and iii. 8 chairs.
d. Require a minimum setback of 9 feet (half the length of an uncovered parking space) for food trucks with service windows facing the public right-of-way. No setback is required for food truck service window facing internally into the commercial lot. Shade canopies, tables, and chairs area allowed within the food truck setback. Allow the Zoning Administrator to increase or decrease setback requirements for individual temporary use permits to account for unique site configurations.

Food Truck Setback Illustrations

e. Temporary Use Permits will not be granted on private property within 100 feet of City Park.
100 ft buffer around City Park
Zoning Code Amendment
City Council also made a recommendation to amend PRMC Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts) to:
 Require a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) for ALL food trucks operating in the City and vending to the public (with an exception for food trucks operating as a caterer for a special event), and;  Require on-site commercial businesses hosting more than seven special events in a year with food trucks to obtain a Temporary Use Permit.

The Planning Commission considered the recommended changes at their April 14, 2026 meeting, and recommended updated language throughout the Zoning Code and the Uptown/Town Center Specific Plan to enact these changes and to clean up outdated language and references. The following is a summary of all proposed changes. A clean copy (without editing marks) of all recommended changes is included as Attachment 1.

Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts)
The purpose of this section is to ensure that food trucks are compatible with surrounding and adjacent land uses and do not create an adverse impact on adjacent properties by reason of noise, parking, and litter. There are no changes to the purpose and applicability of this section with this amendment.

Special Events that Include Food Trucks
Food Trucks operating on City Property or for a City hosted event are not subject to the requirements or permitting of Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts). Subsection 21.69.120.B states, The provisions of this Section shall not apply to persons operating a food truck as part of a certified farmer’s market, an authorized street fair or other event occurring under a special permit issued by the City of Paso Robles, or as allowed by the City in City parks provided that the food truck is part of the event and is complying with all terms of the permit or permits issued for the event.

Food trucks operating on City property are allowed for special events, subject to the conditions of the related special event permit. PRMC Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts) applies to food trucks operating on private property. The proposed amendments do not change or modify standards for City events that include food trucks. Food truck operators participating in City events continue to be required to coordinate with the respective lead agency/department organizing the event.

Catering
The proposed amendments to PRMC Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts) would require a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) for ALL food trucks operating in the City and vending to the public, with the exception that food trucks operating as a caterer for a special event are not required to have a TUP.

Proposed Subsection 21.69.120.C states,
Caterer. The provisions of Paragraph 21.69.120.D.1 (Temporary Use Permit Required) shall not apply to a food truck operating as a caterer (invited by a commercial business to provide food and/or beverages at a commercial business site) at a special event or events for up to 7 days in a fiscal year (July 1 – June 30), if only one food truck is operating at the special event or events at a time. Catering food trucks shall comply with Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for All Food Trucks).

This will allow food trucks operating as caterers to be exempt from the permitting requirements for food trucks but still ensure operational requirements are being met. Therefore, food trucks would still obtain the necessary County Environmental Health permit, fire inspection, business license, and wastewater approval to safely operate without triggering the need for a temporary use permit.

Furthermore, pursuant to PRMC Chapter 21.20 (Temporary Use Permits), events lasting seven or more days are subject to approval of a TUP including parking lot sales, promotional events, temporary food services, fairs, and festivals, and other similar events as determined by the Zoning Administrator (PRMC Section 21.20.030). These uses often utilize a food truck or food trucks to cater their event. The temporary use permit for the event would allow staff to evaluate all aspects including any participating food truck vendor(s). Therefore, food trucks catering events at the same site for more than seven days in a fiscal year would be reviewed in conjunction with the event’s TUP as opposed to the food truck operator needing a separate temporary use permit for catering different events.

Proposed Subparagraph 21.69.120.D.1.b. clarifies when certain event operators must obtain a TUP when such events include food trucks as follows:

Commercial Business Sites. A commercial business site shall require approval of a Temporary Use Permit (Chapter 21.20) if the site hosts catering food trucks, as defined and regulated in Subsection 21.69.120.C, at a special event or events for more than 7 days in a fiscal year.

Permitting Requirements for Food Trucks
The existing permitting requirements for food trucks listed in PRMC Section 21.69.120.C differentiate permit requirements by length of time operating at one site. Community Service officers have expressed a concern that it is difficult to track the number of days a food truck is operating at one site, which complicates code enforcement actions. Community Service officers recommended removing the 7-day threshold triggering the requirement for a temporary use permit. The amendment would assist enforcement efforts and help direct food truck operators to the Planning Division to obtain a temporary use permit if they wish to continue vending to the public.

Proposed Subparagraph 21.69.120.D.1.a would require a temporary use permit for food trucks operating on private property vending to the public on their first day of operation:

Temporary Use Permit Required. Food trucks shall not operate without approval of a Temporary Use Permit (Chapter 21.20). No Temporary Use Permit shall be issued for a food truck unless it conforms to the requirements of Subsection 21.69.120.E (Temporary Use Permits for Food Trucks) and Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for Food Trucks).” Therefore, if a food truck is not operating as a caterer or in conjunction with a City event as stated in the section preface (Section 120.69.120 a-c), the food truck would have to obtain a temporary use permit.

Proposed Subsection 21.69.120.E outlinesspecial requirements for temporary use permits for food trucks:

Temporary Use Permits for Food Trucks. In addition to the standards in Chapter 21.20 (Temporary Use Permits), Temporary Use Permits for Food Trucks shall be subject to the following:

1. Duration. Food Truck Temporary Use Permits shall last no more than 365 days and shall expire at the end of the fiscal year (as defined by Section 3.28.200 (Business license tax—How and when payable)) in which it is issued.

2. Payment. Food Truck Temporary Use Permits are subject to the adopted fee for a Temporary Use Permit and are not prorated for portions of a fiscal year.

3. Sites. Up to 2 specific locations included in a single submittal for a Food Truck Temporary Use Permit application are eligible to be reviewed and included in the issuance of the permit.

The duration of the TUP would align with the expiration of the business licensing allowing staff to coordinate correspondence and outreach with the Finance Department and allow the food truck operator to renew their business license and temporary use permit concurrently. This will aid with streamlining the process for the applicant and permit tracking and enforcement efforts for staff. In addition, food truck operators expressed desire to apply for more than one location in on application given their mobile nature. Therefore, the zoning code amendment would permit two sites to be reviewed in one temporary use permit application if included at the time of application submittal.

Currently food trucks operating on a single site for one year or more are allowed to apply for a Site Plan (PRMC 21.17), which is a permanent approval to operate. The City has not processed any applications for Food Truck Site Plan review. The draft amendment would eliminate this option, instead requiring approval of a new temporary use permit each year.

Site Plan approval is a vested right that is more typically used for permanent improvements. Allowing long-term approval of food trucks at a single location does not align with the temporary and mobile nature of food truck operations. Food trucks may operate on a specific site for over a year if their temporary use permit is renewed and in compliance each year. This allows all departments to analyze the food truck and site compliance each year.

Requirements for Food Trucks
Existing Subsection 21.69.120.E defines operational requirements for all food trucks. The text amendments would renumber these standards to Subsection 21.69.120.F and would clean up the following:
 Temporary Shade Structures. Current operational requirements include:

6. Temporary Shade Structures. Temporary shade structures shall be removed whenever the food truck is not in operation.
and

14. Equipment Storage. Food trucks and associated equipment shall not be stored overnight at the location of vending.

The proposed amendment would delete requirement No. 6 because requirement No. 14 is more inclusive of all equipment including shade structures. The change would alleviate confusion about accessory structures and remove duplicate language.
 Business Licenses Required. Food truck vendors are required to have a valid business license to operate within City limits. Operational requirement 9, “Business Licenses Required” has been modified to correctly cite Title 3, Chapter 3.28 (Business License Tax). In addition, insurance and liability language has been removed. Liability for use of the food truck on private property is a civil matter between private parties. The amended language for the business license requirement states,
The vendor shall have a valid business license issued by the city pursuant to Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.28 (Business License Tax).

Fire Department Inspections. Between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2025, food-truck fire inspections were delegated to the County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Department, which caused some confusion among food truck operators because the PRMC indicates an inspection by the City Fire Department is required. However, the 2025 Fire Code allows the City Fire Department to conduct necessary inspections to ensure fire safety on all food trucks. Effective January 1, 2026, the City of Paso Robles Fire Department is the agency responsible for inspecting food trucks annually and hood systems biannually.

In addition, the Central Coast Fire Prevention Association is developing a collaborative, regional system for inspecting food trucks one time instead of separately for each jurisdiction. Once the program is in place, a food truck operator will receive an inspection by one of the participating jurisdictions, which would then be valid throughout the county. Additional information will be made available to the public as soon as possible.

To align with the Central Coast Fire Prevention Association inspections, staff has amended the language of operational requirement 11, Fire Department Inspection to be as follows:

Fire Department Inspection. All food trucks shall be inspected and approved by a jurisdiction within the Central Coast Fire Prevention Association (CCFPA) prior to issuance of its initial business license and from time to time thereafter in the discretion of a jurisdiction within the CCFPA. At a minimum, all cooking equipment producing greaseladen vapors shall be protected by a UL 300 listed automatic fire extinguishing system. A Class K fire extinguisher shall be provided within each vending vehicle at an accessible location. All fire protection equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced at intervals required by the California Fire Code.

Chapter 21.20 (Temporary Use Permits)
Based on the recommended amendments to PRMC Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts), amended are needed in PRMC Chapter 21.20 (Temporary Use Permits). “Single food truck operating in one location less than seven days (subject to Section 21.69.120)“ is proposed to be removed from the list of exempt temporary uses in Section 21.20.020. “Single food truck operating in one location no more than one year (subject to Section 21.69.120)” would be added to the list of uses requiring a TUP in Section 21.20.030.

Section 21.91.070 (“F” Definitions)
The County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health department defines food trucks as:
“Mobile Food Facilities: any vehicle used in conjunction with a commissary or other permanent food facility upon which food is sold or distributed at retail. A "mobile food facility" does not include a "transporter" used to transport packaged food from a food facility, or other approved source to the consumer.”
The proposed amendment would add the phrase “mobile food facility” to the definition of “food truck” to correlate the two jurisdictions’ permitting requirements:

Food Truck. A vending vehicle or mobile food facility selling food and/or beverages in an operable motorized coach or trailer with current department of motor vehicles registration and a current food safety permit acceptable to the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Services Division.

Table 21.32-1 (Zoning District Use Regulations)
PRMC Table 21.32-1 is proposed to be amended to align with proposed changes in Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts). All food trucks would require a TUP and Site Plan review is no longer an option for food trucks. No changes are proposed to the zones that permit or prohibit food trucks. No changes are proposed to the food truck courts.

Proposed PRMC Table 21.32-1 (Zoning District Use Regulations) Land
Uses
R-A R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 OP CP C-1 C-2 C-3 RC RL M PM AP AG POS OS PF Specific Use Regulations
Food
truck — — — — — — —
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
— — — —
See
Section 21.69.120
(Food Trucks and
Food Truck Courts)
*Permits for one year
or more require a site
plan review (Chapter

21.17)
Food
truck
court
— — — — — — — C C C C C C C C C — — — — See
Section 21.69.120
(Food Trucks and
Food Truck Courts)
Uptown/Town Center Specific Plan (UTCSP) Table 5.3-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permitting Requirements) Table 5.3-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permitting Requirements) in the Uptown/Town Center Specific Plan did not have a line item for food trucks or food truck courts. The amendment makes clear food trucks are allowed in all the mixed-use districts of the specific plan, but not in the residential and open space districts.

Proposed UTCSP Table 5.3-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permitting Requirements) Land Use
Type
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY ZONE Specific Use
Regulations
T3-N T3-F T4-N T4-F T4-NC TC-1 TC-2 RSC OS
Food Truck - TUP - TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP - See Paso Robles Municipal Code
Section 21.69.120
(Food Trucks and
Food Truck Courts)
Food Truck
Court
- CUP - CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP - See Paso Robles
Municipal Code
Section 21.69.120
(Food Trucks and
Food Truck Courts)

The following maps show the areas of the city where TUPs for food trucks can be considered by the City.

Citywide Map Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan Area
Fiscal Impact
The zoning code and specific plan amendment would not directly impact the City’s fiscal resources.

CEQA
The proposed ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA. State CEQA Guidelines §15060(c) provides that “[a]n activity is not subject to CEQA if … the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378” and, alternatively, is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

Recommendation (Option 2)
Introduce for first reading, by title only, Ordinance XXXX amending Paso Robles Municipal Code Section

21.69.120, Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts; Chapter 21.20, Temporary Use Permits; Table 21.32-1, Zoning District Use Regulations; and Section 21.91.070, “F” Definitions; and amending the Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan Table 5.3-1, Allowed Land Uses and Permitting Requirements.

Attachments

1. Clean Version of Proposed Amendments to Paso Robles Municipal Code and Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan

2. Ordinance XXXX - Amendment to Paso Robles Municipal Code and Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan

3. Legal Notice Affidavit

Attachment 1

21.69.120 Food trucks and food truck courts.

A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this section is to ensure that food trucks are compatible with surrounding and adjacent uses and do not create an adverse impact on adjacent properties by reason of noise, parking, and litter.

B. Special Events that Include Food Trucks. The provisions of this section shall not apply to persons operating a food truck as part of a certified farmer's market, an authorized street fair or other event occurring under a special permit issued by the City of Paso Robles, or as allowed by the City in city parks provided that the food truck is part of the event and is complying with all terms of the permit or permits issued for the event.

C. Caterer. The provisions of Subsection 21.69.120.D(1) (Temporary Use Permit Required) shall not apply to a food truck operating as a caterer (invited by a commercial business to provide food and/or beverages at a commercial business site) at a special event or events for up to 7 days in a fiscal year (July 1 – June 30), if only one food truck is operating at the special event or events at a time. Catering food trucks shall comply with Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for All Food Trucks).

D. Permit Requirements Food Trucks. All food trucks shall comply with the operational requirements of Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for All Food Trucks). In addition, the following Zoning Approvals are required.

1. Temporary Use Permit Required.
a) Food Trucks. Food trucks shall not operate without approval of a Temporary Use Permit (Chapter 21.20). No Temporary Use Permit shall be issued for a food truck unless it conforms to the requirements of Subsection

21.69.120.E (Temporary Use Permits for Food Trucks) and Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for Food Trucks).
b) Commercial Business Sites. A commercial business site shall require approval of a Temporary Use Permit (Chapter

21.20) if the site hosts catering food trucks, as defined and regulated in Subsection 21.69.120.C, at a special event or events for more than 7 days in a fiscal year.

2. Conditional Use Permit Required. Food Truck Courts require approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Chapter 21.19).

Applications for a Conditional Use Permit shall demonstrate permanent improvements to accommodate the Food Truck Court and shall conform to the requirements of Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for Food Trucks) to the satisfaction of the Review Authority.

E. Temporary Use Permits for Food Trucks. In addition to the standards in Chapter 21.20 (Temporary Use Permits), Temporary Use Permits for Food Trucks shall be subject to the following:

1. Duration. Food Truck Temporary Use Permits shall last no more than 365 days and shall expire at the end of the fiscal year (as defined by Section 3.28.200 (Business license tax—How and when payable)) in which it is issued.

Attachment 1

2. Payment. Food Truck Temporary Use Permits are subject to the adopted fee for a Temporary Use Permit and are not prorated for portions of a fiscal year.

3. Sites. Up to 2 specific locations included in a single submittal for a Food Truck Temporary Use Permit application are eligible to be reviewed and included in the issuance of the permit.

F. Operational Requirements for Food Trucks. All food trucks shall comply with the following requirements:

1. Private Property. Food trucks shall operate only on private property with an existing commercial use and only as an accessory use to an existing business.

2. Written Approval of Owner. The written approval of the owner of the location shall be obtained. A copy of this approval shall be provided to the zoning administrator with the permit application, prior to operating at the location. The vendor shall maintain proof of the owner's approval in the vehicle. The person operating the food truck shall present this proof upon the demand of a peace officer or city employee authorized to enforce.

3. Permanent Surface Parking. The food truck shall only be stopped, standing, or parked on a permanent surface paved with concrete, asphalt, or similar as determined by the review authority.

4. Litter Removal. Each vendor shall provide adequate garbage receptacles accessible to customers for disposal of garbage.

The food truck and surrounding property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner at all times. The mobile vendor shall remove litter caused by its products from any public and private property within a twenty-five-foot radius of the food truck's location.

5. No Discharge of Liquid. The vendor shall not discharge any liquid (e.g., water, grease, oil, etc.) onto or into city streets, storm drains, catch basins, or sewer facilities. All discharges shall be contained and properly disposed of by the vendor.

6. Noise. The vendor shall be subject to the noise provisions set forth in Chapter 21.82 (Noise). The operation shall at all times be conducted in a manner not detrimental to surrounding properties or residents by reason of lights, noise, activities, parking, or other actions. The vendor shall prohibit loitering at the site and shall control noisy patrons on-site and those leaving the premises. No amplified music or loudspeakers shall be permitted.

7. Hours of Operation. Food truck vending hours shall be established by the review authority with the required permit.

8. Business License Required. The vendor shall have a valid business license issued by the city pursuant to Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.28 (Business License Tax).

9. Health Permit Required for Food Sales. Vendors operating a food trucks shall have a valid permit issued by the San Luis Obispo County Health Agency. All required county health permits shall be in the possession of the mobile food vendor at all times during which it operates within the city.

Attachment 1

10. Fire Department Inspection. All food trucks shall be inspected and approved by a jurisdiction within the Central Coast Fire Prevention Association (CCFPA) prior to issuance of its initial business license and from time to time thereafter in the discretion of a jurisdiction within the Central Coast Fire Prevention Association (CCFPA). At a minimum, all cooking equipment producing grease-laden vapors shall be protected by a UL 300 listed automatic fire extinguishing system. A Class K fire extinguisher shall be provided within each vending vehicle at an accessible location. All fire protection equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced at intervals required by the California Fire Code.

11. Circulation. Food trucks and trailers and associated equipment shall not alter the circulation pattern of parking lots nor shall they be parked in restricted areas marked for "no parking", "fire lane", etc.

12. Egress. Food trucks shall not block egress from a building.

13. Equipment Storage. Food trucks and associated equipment shall not be stored overnight at the location of vending.

14. Conditions of Approval. Food trucks shall comply with all conditions of approval required by the review authority approving a temporary use permit, site plan, or conditional use permit.

21.20.020 Exempt temporary uses.

The following uses do not require a temporary use Permit:

A. Seasonal stands (such as pumpkin and Christmas tree sales) without a caretaker unit lasting up to ninety days.

B. Construction offices in conjunction with construction of a building or other approved development project.

C. Parking lot sales and other promotional events where only on-site businesses are participating and lasting no more than seven days.

D. Garage and rummage sales (subject to Section 21.20.040).

E. Temporary food service (such as barbecues) when located at the business's permanent location or in conjunction with a non-profit fundraising event lasting less than seven days.

F. Sidewalk vending (subject to Subsection 21.20.040(B)).

21.20.030 Allowed temporary uses.

A. The following activities may be approved by a temporary use permit:

1. Real estate sales offices (within approved development projects).

2. Parking lot sales and other promotional events where only on-site businesses are participating and lasting seven or more days (if less than seven days, no temporary use permit is required).

Attachment 1

3. Trailers/temporary buildings in conjunction with an existing on-site business and remaining no more than twelve months.

4. Single food truck operating in one location no more than one year (subject to Section 21.69.120).

5. Temporary food service (such barbecues) when located at the business' permanent location or in conjunction with a nonprofit fundraising event lasting seven or more days.

6. Seasonal stands (such as pumpkin and Christmas tree sales) with a caretaker unit lasting up to ninety days.

7. Circuses, carnivals, fairs, festivals, and concerts lasting up to thirty days.

8. Off-site construction yards with a valid building permit (no temporary use permit is required if on an immediately adjacent property).

9. Similar temporary uses as determined by the zoning administrator.

B. Temporary Uses Requiring an Administrative Use Permit. Other temporary events and special events, outdoor sales, and displays may be allowed with the approval of an administrative use permit pursuant to Chapter 21.19 (Conditional Use Permits and Administrative Use Permits) so long as they are determined to not impact neighboring uses or otherwise create significant impacts.

21.91.070 "F" definitions.

Family Day Care Home. A day-care facility for children under the age of eighteen for periods of fewer than twenty-four hours a day licensed by the state, which is located in a dwelling unit, where a resident of the dwelling provides care and supervision for fourteen or fewer children (or capacity limits as set forth by the state, including children who reside at the home and are under the age of ten. See Health and Safety Code Section 1596.78. For larger and commercial facilities see "Day Care Center".

Farmers' Market. See "certified farmers market and year-round roadside produce stands".

Financial Institutions. A bank, savings and loan, credit union, or other financial institution that provides retail banking services to individuals and businesses. These uses include only those institutions engaged in the on-site circulation of cash money. Does not include check cashing stores.

Food and Beverage Sales. Retail sales of food and beverages for off-site preparation and consumption including groceries, supermarkets, mini-marts, delis, liquor stores, specialty food stores.

Food and Kindred Products Processing. Facilities that cook, manufacture, package, label, or store food and related products including animal processing for consumption off site but do not provide products directly to a consumer. Uses do not include any retail components unless such retail sales are permitted in the applicable zoning district. This use classification excludes "wineries,

Attachment 1
breweries and distilleries", which is defined separately. see also "industrial - artisan" for small scale facilities that include onsite sales.

Food Truck. A vending vehicle or mobile food facility selling food and/or beverages in an operable motorized coach or trailer with current department of motor vehicles registration and a current food safety permit acceptable to the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Services Division.

Food Truck Court. An area designated for two or more food trucks to park for the purpose of selling food and beverages.

Fuel Sales. See "vehicle fuel sales" and "vehicle charging station".

Funeral Services. An establishment primarily engaged in the provision of services involving the care, preparation, or disposition of human remains and conducting memorial services. Typical uses may include crematories, columbaria, mausoleums, mortuaries, funeral chapels, and funeral homes.

Table 21.32-1: Zoning District Use Regulations (portion) Land Uses R-A R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 OP CP C-1 C-2 C-3 RC RL M PM AP AG POS OS PF Specific Use Regulations Food truck
— — — — — — —

T T T T T T T T T
— — — —
See
Section 21.69.120 (Food
Trucks and Food Truck
Courts)
Table 5.3-1: Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements (Uptown Town Centre Specific Plan) (portion) Land Use Type PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY ZONE Specific Use Regulations T3-N T3-F T4-N T4-F T4-NC TC-1 TC-2 RSC OS
Food Truck - TUP - TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP - See Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and
Food Truck Courts)

Attachment 1
Food Truck Court - CUP - CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP - See Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and
Food Truck Courts)

Attachment 2
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX N.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
AMENDING PASO ROBLES MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 21.69.120 (FOOD TRUCKS AND FOOD TRUCK COURTS), CHAPTER 21.20 (TEMPORARY USE PERMITS), TABLE 21.32-1 (ZONING DISTRICT USE REGULATIONS), SECTION 21.91.070 (“F” DEFINITIONS); AND UPTOWN/TOWN CENTRE SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE 5.3-1 (ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS),

AND FINDING THE ACTION NOT A PROJECT SUBJECT TO CEQA
WHEREAS, on October 1, 2024, City Council approved a variety of updates to the Paso Robles Zoning Code, Title 21 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code (PRMC), including updates to PRMC Section 21.69.120, “Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts”. This section of the municipal code establishes the permit requirements and operational standards for food trucks operating within the City limits. The rules codified staff policy on food trucks that had existed since 2019; and WHEREAS, all food trucks are required to comply with the operational requirements of Section

21.69.120, have a valid City business license, and have an active County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Heath Permit; and
WHEREAS, food trucks operating at one location for more than seven days in a calendar year are required to obtain a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) and must meet the findings provided in PRMC Section 21.20.070, “Findings for Approval and Revocation” of Temporary Use Permits; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2025, City Council discussed a ‘Legislative Update and Review Regarding Food Truck Regulations’. Staff presented the current permitting process as well as some of the challenges in enforcing the food truck standards and permitting requirements due to ambiguity in the municipal code. Members of the public were invited to participate in the discussion and provided feedback. The City Council voted to establish an Ad Hoc Committee of the City Council to be comprised of Councilmember Gregory and Councilmember Bausch to address food truck regulations and report back to City Council within 6 months with recommendations for future action based on the discussion; and
WHEREAS, the first Food Truck Regulation Review City Council Ad Hoc Committee meeting was held on September 22, 2025. The priority of the meeting was to gather more in-depth feedback from the public. The meeting had a high level of participation from the public. Ad hoc committee members directed staff to collect additional information on the following topics:
a. Generators that can meet Noise Ordinance requirements, b. Comparison of the current food truck policies listed on the City’s website and the standards in the Zoning Ordinance,
c. Clarification on Fire inspection requirements,
d. Additional information on complaints received by the City regarding food trucks, e. Policies and options for food trucks utilizing tables, chairs, and shade structures, and
f. Clarification of how the 7-day rule applies to food trucks hired to serve food at special events (not operated by the City); and
WHEREAS, the second Food Truck Regulation Review City Council Ad Hoc Committee meeting was held on November 12, 2025. The priority of the meeting was to report back on topics brought to

Attachment 2
light at the first ad hoc meeting. This included details of previous food truck complaints, providing clear and concise rules that align with other departments’ requirements, and additional information on fire department inspections. Staff also provided draft recommendations to gather feedback from the Ad Hoc Committee members and from the public. Ad hoc committee members made recommendations for the following topics:
a. Generator Noise,
b. Accessory Furniture,
c. Temporary Use Permit permitting requirements,
d. Setbacks, and
e. Proximity to Downtown; and
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2025, Staff reported the findings and recommendations made at the second Food Truck Regulation Review City Council Ad Hoc Committee back to City Council for review and formal recommendations. City Council provided specific direction to staff regarding operational requirements effective immediately:
a. Food trucks will utilize generator acoustic panels to protect adjacent land uses and the public right-of-way from excessive noise and to comply with the Noise Ordinance. b. Accessory furniture is not permitted:
i. In the public right of way (e.g., sidewalk or parkways), or ii. Where it will obstruct circulation, ingress, or egress c. The following accessory furniture is permitted:
i. 1 shade structure, no more than 120 square feet in size; and ii. Table(s) totaling no more than 24 square feet in size; and iii. 8 chairs
d. Require a minimum setback of 9 feet (half the length of an uncovered parking space) for food trucks with service windows facing the public right-of-way. No setback is required for food truck service window facing internally into the commercial lot.

Shade canopies, tables, and chairs are allowed within the food truck setback. Allow the Zoning Administrator to increase or decrease setback requirements for individual Temporary Use Permits to account for unique site configurations. e. Temporary Use Permits will not be granted on private property within 100 feet of City Park; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also recommended an amendment to PRMC Section 21.69.120 to:
a. Require a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) for ALL food trucks operating in the City and vending to the public. Exception - food trucks operating as a caterer for a special event are not required to have a TUP, and
b. Require on-site commercial businesses hosting more than 7 special events that include a food truck in a year to obtain a Temporary Use Permit; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2026, on a vote of 5-0, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC 26-022 to recommend the City Council adopt Ordinance XXXX to approve Rezone 25-08 to amend Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts), Chapter

21.20 (Temporary Use Permits), Table 21.32-1 (Zoning District Use Regulations), and Section

21.91.070 (“F” Definitions); and Specific Plan Amendment 26-02 to amend Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan (UTCSP) Table 5.3-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permitting Requirements), based on findings (P25-0070); and

Attachment 2
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing May 5, 2026 to consider the facts as presented in the staff report prepared for this purpose, and to accept public testimony regarding this proposed text amendment to the Paso Robles Municipal Code and Specific Plan Amendment to the Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan, and; WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA. State CEQA Guidelines §15060(c) provides that “[a]n activity is not subject to CEQA if … the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378” and, alternatively, is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as the findings of the City Council in connection with the adoption of this ordinance. In support of the recitals stated above, the City Council hereby finds and determines that it is necessary to adopt an ordinance to establish permitting guidelines and operational requirements to be consistent with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan and to protect the public interest health, safety, and welfare.

Section 2. The City Council hereby makes the following findings with respect to the proposed amendment of Title 21 of the Municipal Code and the Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;
a. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan Land Use as this amendment accommodates for food trucks as a permitted commercial use on commercially zoned properties. This amendment maintains the ability to provide the public access to a commercial good while maintaining aesthetic appeal of City viewsheds and gateways.

2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare;
a. The proposed amendment requires food trucks vending to the public to obtain a temporary use permit issued through the Community Development Department.

This provision allows staff to review food trucks in a site-specific context. In addition, food truck temporary use permits are reviewed by the Fire Department, Industrial Wastewater Division, and is required to have a County of San Luis Obispo Health permit. All food trucks operating within City limits are required to abide by the operational requirements listed in Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts) to ensure the food trucks are not detrimental to public health and safety.

3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of the zoning code.
a. In addition to the City Council’s recommendation to amend Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.69.120 (Food Truck and Food Truck Courts). Staff has

Attachment 2
proposed amendments to Chapter 21.20 (Temporary Use Permits), Table 21.32- 1 (Zoning District Use Regulations), and Section 21.91.070 (“F” Definitions); and Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan (UTCSP) Table 5.3-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permitting Requirements) to ensure consistent language and regulation of food trucks and food truck courts throughout the Zoning Code and Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan.

4. The adoption of the proposed Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA. State CEQA Guidelines §15060(c) provides that “[a]n activity is not subject to CEQA if … the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378” and, alternatively, is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 3. Section 21.69.120 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read in full as follows:

21.69.120 Food trucks and food truck courts.

A. Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this section is to ensure that food trucks are compatible with surrounding and adjacent uses and do not create an adverse impact on adjacent properties by reason of noise, parking, and litter.

B. Special Events that Include Food Trucks. The provisions of this section shall not apply to persons operating a food truck as part of a certified farmer's market, an authorized street fair or other event occurring under a special permit issued by the City of Paso Robles, or as allowed by the City in city parks provided that the food truck is part of the event and is complying with all terms of the permit or permits issued for the event.

C. Caterer. The provisions of Paragraph 21.69.120.D.1 (Temporary Use Permit Required) shall not apply to a food truck operating as a caterer (invited by a commercial business to provide food and/or beverages at a commercial business site) at a special event or events for up to 7 days in a fiscal year (July 1 – June 30), if only one food truck is operating at the special event or events at a time. Catering food trucks shall comply with Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for All Food Trucks).

D. Permit Requirements Food Trucks. All food trucks shall comply with the operational requirements of Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for All Food Trucks). In addition, the following Zoning Approvals are required.

1. Food Truck (single vehicle operating in one location seven days or less). Temporary food trucks lasting less than seven days in a single location are subject to the requirements of Subsection 21.69.120(D) (Operational Requirements for Food Trucks).

2. Food Truck (single vehicle operating in one location more than seven days but less than one year). Temporary food trucks lasting seven or more days (not to exceed one year) in a single location require approval of a temporary use permit (Chapter 21.20). No temporary use permit shall be issued for a food truck unless it conforms to the requirements of Subsections 21.69.120(D) (Operational Requirements for Food Trucks).

3. Food Truck (single vehicle operating in one location one year or more). Temporary food trucks operating for more than one year in a single location shall not operate without

Attachment 2
the approval of a site plan (Chapter 21.17). Applications for a food truck shall conform to the requirements of Subsections 21.69.120(D) (Operational Requirements for Food Trucks).

4. Food Truck Court (two or more). Two or more food trucks located on the same property require approval of a conditional use permit (Chapter 21.19). Applications for a food truck court shall conform to the requirements of this Subsection 21.69.120(D) (Operational Requirements for Food Trucks).

1. Temporary Use Permit Required.
a. Food Trucks. Food trucks shall not operate without approval of a Temporary Use Permit (Chapter 21.20). No Temporary Use Permit shall be issued for a food truck unless it conforms to the requirements of Subsection 21.69.120.E (Temporary Use Permits for Food Trucks) and Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for Food Trucks).
b. Commercial Business Sites. A commercial business site shall require approval of a Temporary Use Permit (Chapter 21.20) if the site hosts catering food trucks, as defined and regulated in Subsection 21.69.120.C, at a special event or events for more than 7 days in a fiscal year.

2. Conditional Use Permit Required. Food Truck Courts require approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Chapter 21.19). Applications for a Conditional Use Permit shall demonstrate permanent improvements to accommodate the Food Truck Court and shall conform to the requirements of Subsection 21.69.120.F (Operational Requirements for Food Trucks) to the satisfaction of the Review Authority.

E. Temporary Use Permits for Food Trucks. In addition to the standards in Chapter 21.20 (Temporary Use Permits), Temporary Use Permits for Food Trucks shall be subject to the following:

1. Duration. Food Truck Temporary Use Permits shall last no more than 365 days and shall expire at the end of the fiscal year (as defined by Section 3.28.200 (Business license tax— How and when payable)) in which it is issued.

2. Payment. Food Truck Temporary Use Permits are subject to the adopted fee for a Temporary Use Permit and are not prorated for portions of a fiscal year.

3. Sites. Up to two (2) specific locations included in a single submittal for a Food Truck Temporary Use Permit application are eligible to be reviewed and included in the issuance of the permit.

F. Operational Requirements for Food Trucks. All food trucks shall comply with the following requirements:

1. Private Property. Food trucks shall operate only on private property with an existing commercial use and only as an accessory use to an existing business.

2. Written Approval of Owner. The written approval of the owner of the location shall be obtained. A copy of this approval shall be provided to the zoning administrator with the permit application, prior to operating at the location. The vendor shall maintain proof of the owner's approval in the vehicle. The person operating the food truck shall present this proof upon the demand of a peace officer or city employee authorized to enforce.

3. Permanent Surface Parking. The food truck shall only be stopped, standing, or parked on a permanent surface paved with concrete, asphalt, or similar as determined by the review authority.

4. Litter Removal. Each vendor shall provide adequate garbage receptacles accessible to customers for disposal of garbage. The food truck and surrounding property shall

Attachment 2
be maintained in a safe and clean manner at all times. The mobile vendor shall remove litter caused by its products from any public and private property within a twenty-fivefoot radius of the food truck's location.

5. No Discharge of Liquid. The vendor shall not discharge any liquid (e.g., water, grease, oil, etc.) onto or into city streets, storm drains, catch basins, or sewer facilities. All discharges shall be contained and properly disposed of by the vendor.

6. Temporary Shade Structures. Temporary shade structures shall be removed whenever the food truck is not in operation.

6. Noise. The vendor shall be subject to the noise provisions set forth in Chapter

21.82 (Noise). The operation shall at all times be conducted in a manner not detrimental to surrounding properties or residents by reason of lights, noise, activities, parking, or other actions. The vendor shall prohibit loitering at the site and shall control noisy patrons on-site and those leaving the premises. No amplified music or loudspeakers shall be permitted.

7. Hours of Operation. Food truck vending hours shall be established by the review authority with the required permit.

8. Business License Required. The vendor shall have a valid business license issued by the city pursuant to Municipal Code Title 5 (Permits and Regulations)Title 3, Chapter

3.28 (Business License Tax). As part of its application for a business license, the vendor shall furnish to the city evidence of insurance, as deemed acceptable in the reasonable discretion of the city, against liability for death or injury to any person as a result of ownership, operation, or use of its food truck.

9. Health Permit Required for Food Sales. Vendors operating a food trucks shall have a valid permit issued by the San Luis Obispo County Health Agency. All required county health permits shall be in the possession of the mobile food vendor at all times during which it operates within the city.

10. Fire Department Inspection. All food trucks shall be inspected and approved by the Paso Robles Fire and Emergency Services Department a jurisdiction within the Central Coast Fire Prevention Association (CCFPA) prior to issuance of its initial business license and from time to time thereafter in the discretion of the Paso Robles Fire and Emergency Services Department a jurisdiction within the CCFPA. At a minimum, all cooking equipment producing grease-laden vapors shall be protected by a UL 300 listed automatic fire extinguishing system. A Class K fire extinguisher shall be provided within each vending vehicle at an accessible location. All fire protection equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced at intervals required by the California Fire Code.

11. Circulation. Food trucks and trailers and associated equipment (such as tables, chairs, garbage receptacles, etc.) shall not alter the circulation pattern of parking lots nor shall they be parked in restricted areas marked for "no parking", "fire lane", etc.

12. Egress. Food trucks shall not block egress from a building.

13. Equipment Storage. Food trucks and associated equipment shall not be stored overnight at the location of vending.

14. Conditions of Approval. Food trucks shall comply with all conditions of approval required by the review authority approving a temporary use permit, site plan, or conditional use permit.

Section 4. Chapter 21.20.020 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read in full as follows:

Attachment 2

21.20.020 Exempt temporary uses. The following uses do not require a temporary use Permit:

A. Seasonal stands (such as pumpkin and Christmas tree sales) without a caretaker unit lasting up to ninety days.

B. Construction offices in conjunction with construction of a building or other approved development project.

C. Parking lot sales and other promotional events where only on-site businesses are participating and lasting no more than seven days.

D. Garage and rummage sales (subject to Section 21.20.040).

E. Single food truck operating in one location less than seven days (subject to Section 21.69.120).

F. Temporary food service (such as barbecues) when located at the business's permanent location or in conjunction with a non-profit fundraising event lasting less than seven days.

G. Sidewalk vending (subject to Subsection 21.20.040.B).

Section 5. Chapter 21.20.030 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read in full as follows:

21.20.030 Allowed temporary uses.

A. The following activities may be approved by a temporary use permit:

1. Real estate sales offices (within approved development projects).

2. Parking lot sales and other promotional events where only on-site businesses are participating and lasting seven or more days (if less than seven days, no temporary use permit is required).

3. Trailers/temporary buildings in conjunction with an existing on-site business and remaining no more than one year twelve months.

4. Single food truck operating in one location seven or more days but not no more than one year (subject to Section 21.69.120).

5. Temporary food service (such barbecues) when located at the business' permanent location or in conjunction with a non-profit fundraising event lasting seven or more days.

6. Seasonal stands (such as pumpkin and Christmas tree sales) with a caretaker unit lasting up to ninety days.

7. Circuses, carnivals, fairs, festivals, and concerts lasting up to thirty days.

8. Off-site construction yards with a valid building permit (no temporary use permit is required if on an immediately adjacent property).

9. Similar temporary uses as determined by the zoning administrator.

B. Temporary Uses Requiring an Administrative Use Permit. Other temporary events and special events, outdoor sales, and displays may be allowed with the approval of an administrative use permit pursuant to Chapter 21.19 (Conditional Use Permits and Administrative Use Permits) so long as they are determined to not impact neighboring uses or otherwise create significant impacts.

Section 6. Section 21.91.070 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read in full as follows:
“21.91.070 "F" definitions.

Family Day Care Home. A day-care facility for children under the age of eighteen for periods of fewer than twenty-four hours a day licensed by the state, which is located in a dwelling unit,

Attachment 2
where a resident of the dwelling provides care and supervision for fourteen or fewer children (or capacity limits as set forth by the state, including children who reside at the home and are under the age of ten. See Health and Safety Code Section 1596.78. For larger and commercial facilities see "Day Care Center".

Farmers' Market. See "certified farmers market and year-round roadside produce stands".

Financial Institutions. A bank, savings and loan, credit union, or other financial institution that provides retail banking services to individuals and businesses. These uses include only those institutions engaged in the on-site circulation of cash money. Does not include check cashing stores.

Food and Beverage Sales. Retail sales of food and beverages for off-site preparation and consumption including groceries, supermarkets, mini-marts, delis, liquor stores, specialty food stores.

Food and Kindred Products Processing. Facilities that cook, manufacture, package, label, or store food and related products including animal processing for consumption off site but do not provide products directly to a consumer. Uses do not include any retail components unless such retail sales are permitted in the applicable zoning district. This use classification excludes "wineries, breweries and distilleries", which is defined separately. see also "industrial - artisan" for small scale facilities that include onsite sales.

Food Truck. A vending vehicle or mobile food facility selling food and/or beverages in an operable motorized coach or trailer with current department of motor vehicles registration and a current food safety permit acceptable to the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Services Division.

Food Truck Court. An area designated for two or more food trucks to park for the purpose of selling food and beverages.

Fuel Sales. See "vehicle fuel sales" and "vehicle charging station".

Funeral Services. An establishment primarily engaged in the provision of services involving the care, preparation, or disposition of human remains and conducting memorial services. Typical uses may include crematories, columbaria, mausoleums, mortuaries, funeral chapels, and funeral homes.

Section 7. “Food Truck” line item within Table 21.16.200 of Title 21, Chapter 21.32 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code is amended by modifying the permit requirements on the chart to accurately reflect the amended permit requirements of Chapter 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts) to read as follows:

Table 21.32-1: Zoning District Use Regulations (portion) Land Uses R-A R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 OP CP C-1 C-2 C-3 RC RL M PM AP AG POS OS PF Specific Use Regulations Food truck
— — — — — — —
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T
T
P/
T*
T
P/
T*
T
— — — —
See
Section 21.69.120 (Food
Trucks and Food Truck
Courts)
*Permits for one year or
more require a site plan
review (Chapter 21.17)

Attachment 2
Section 8. A portion of Table 5.3-1 of the Uptown/Town Centre Specific Plan is amended by adding “Food Truck” and “Food Truck Court” line items to accurately reflect the amended permit requirements of Chapter 21.69.120 (Food Trucks and Food Truck Courts) to read as follows:

Table 5.3-1: Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements (Uptown Town Centre Specific Plan) (portion)
Land Use Type PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY ZONE Specific Use
Regulations
T3-N T3-F T4-N T4-F T4-NC TC-1 TC-2 RSC OS
Family day care
center for
more than 14
children or
non-family day
care center

CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP - - CUP -
Food Truck - TUP - TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP - See Paso Robles Municipal Code
Section 21.69.120
(Food Trucks and
Food Truck Courts)
Food Truck
Court
- CUP - CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP - See Paso Robles
Municipal Code
Section 21.69.120
(Food Trucks and
Food Truck Courts)
Meeting
Facilities,
public or
private

CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP
Section 9. This Ordinance shall be effective thirty days from the date of its adoption.

Section 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall post or publish this Ordinance as required by law.

Section 11. The adoption of the proposed Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA. State CEQA Guidelines §15060(c) provides that “[a]n activity is not subject to CEQA if … the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378” and, alternatively, is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 12. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application to other

Attachment 2
persons or places.

Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5th day of May 2026, and passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles on the _____ day of _________________ 2026 by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
__________________________________
John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Melissa Martin, City Clerk

Attachment 3

Council Agenda Report
From: Ryan Cornell, Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Subject: Preliminary Overview of the General and Supplemental Sales Tax Funds Budget for Fiscal Years 2026-27 and 2027-28 and the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Date: May 5, 2026
Facts

1. The City Council is required to adopt a comprehensive Operating and Capital Budget to authorize the receipt of revenues and guide City operations no later than June 30 each year. The development of the biannual budget is a multi-month process, typically spanning four to five months, and incorporates financial forecasting, policy direction, and department input.

2. On November 21, 2025, a facilitated Visioning Session and Workshop was conducted by Jacob Green and Associates, Inc. (JGA) for the City Council and City Manager. The workshop was designed to provide an opportunity to collaborate and engage in structured strategic discussions related to the Council’s overall vision.

3. The outcomes of the workshop enhanced communication and fostered a shared understanding of City Council priorities. The process culminated in the development of a vision document outlining six key goal areas and associated initiatives intended to strengthen organizational alignment in advance of the FY 2026–28 budget cycle. The preliminary goal areas identified by the City Council include:
a. Facilities, Transportation & Infrastructure
b. Public Safety
c. Housing and Homelessness
d. Cultural, Recreational & Open Space
e. Community & Economic Development
f. Efficient & Effective Government

4. In December 2025, the City extended its engagement with Jacob Green and Associates, Inc. to continue facilitation services with the City’s leadership team. This phase focused on identifying departmental initiatives aligned with Council priorities, developing implementation strategies, assigning responsible departments and support teams, and establishing preliminary timelines. This effort ensures alignment between the Council’s strategic vision and both near-term and long-term operational planning.

5. On March 26, 2026, staff presented the City Council with updates related to the Visioning and Goal Setting Workshop, including progress on refining initiatives and aligning departmental work plans with the Council’s strategic direction. A special meeting has been agendized for May 6, 2026, to continue this discussion.

6. Although the City Council’s goals and priorities define the desired direction of the organization, fiscal constraints ultimately shape the scope and pace of implementation. Reviewing the City’s financial

outlook provides the necessary context to evaluate trade-offs and prioritize initiatives within limited resources.

7. This report focuses on the General Fund, the Supplemental Sales Tax Fund (i.e., Measures J-20 and I24) as well as the Capital Improvement Program. A review of the City’s enterprise funds (Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste and Airport) and enterprise-related capital improvements will be presented to City Council at its regular meeting on May 19, 2026.

Options

1. Receive and file this report and provide any desired direction on the preparation of the Fiscal Years 2026-27 and 2027-28 budget items outlined within the report;

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
The City’s budget development framework is guided by four primary priorities: (1) the long-term wellbeing and economic strength of the community; (2) the long-term fiscal stability of the City; (3) the nature and scope of municipal services provided; and (4) the overall well-being of the organization and its employees. As a service-based organization, the City relies heavily on its workforce to deliver essential services, making organizational health a critical component of financial planning. The budget process is therefore centered on balancing these priorities in a manner that ensures they work collectively to support both current service levels and long-term sustainability.

The Fiscal Year 2027 and 2028 budget reflects a cautious approach shaped by broader economic uncertainty and rising costs. General Fund revenue projections are being influenced by several external factors, including reduced discretionary consumer spending, elevated lending rates, and persistent inflationary pressures. These conditions, coupled with ongoing uncertainty in the overall economic outlook, are expected to constrain revenue growth in the near term.

At the same time, expenditures are trending upward. Recently adopted three-year labor agreements, which took effect earlier this year, are a driver of increased personnel costs. Additional pressures include rising risk management expenses and general cost escalations across contracts and services. As a result of these factors the budget does not propose any significant staffing expansions. The only change is a minor reorganization within the Police Department, resulting in a net increase of fewer than two full-time equivalent positions.

The City’s fiscal outlook remains stable, with modest revenue growth projected in the near term.

However, consistent with prior discussions, major revenue sources, including sales tax and transient occupancy tax, have leveled off following several years of significant post-pandemic growth. For example, transient occupancy tax experienced increases of approximately 40 percent and 25 percent in successive years but has since slowed to less than 1.6 percent growth over the past four years.

Looking ahead, General Fund and Supplemental Sales Tax (SST) revenues for FY 2026-27 and 2027-28 are projected at approximately $74.4 million and $79.5 million, respectively, representing an increase of 3.3% in the first year and 2.0% in the second year. While growth is expected to continue, it is at a more moderate pace, reinforcing the importance of prudent fiscal management and ongoing monitoring of economic conditions.

Despite this moderation in revenue growth, the City remains in a strong financial position. General Fund reserves are projected to total approximately $16.5 million at the end of the current fiscal year,

representing approximately 31 percent of annual revenues, just above the City Council’s Fiscal Policy target of 30 percent.

In addition to General Fund reserves, the City maintains several other funding sources that further strengthen its financial position. These include approximately $12.4 million in a Section 115 Pension Trust Fund, which is designated exclusively for pension-related costs and provides flexibility to manage future CalPERS obligations during periods of fiscal stress. While staff is not recommending the use of these funds in the current budget cycle, the trust serves as an important financial management tool. Additional reserves include the City Hall Development Fund (approximately $1.1 million), the City Facility Replacement Fund (approximately $115,000), and the Measure J-20 Fund (approximately $15.9 million), all of which support long-term capital and infrastructure needs.

Taken together, the City’s financial condition remains solid entering the upcoming two-year budget cycle.

While revenue growth has stabilized and external economic uncertainties remain, the City’s strong reserve position, adherence to fiscal policies, and proactive financial planning provide a stable foundation to advance Council priorities.

Estimated General Revenues
FYE 2025
Actual % Chg
FYE 2026
Projected % Chg
FYE 2027
Estimated % Chg
FYE 2028
Estimated % Chg
Sales Tax 13,277,120 -2.5 13,604,576 2.5 13,581,200 -0.2 13,928,200 2.6 I-24 SST 6,756,805 -0.1 6,733,371 -0.3 6,781,000 0.7 6,955,000 2.6 J-20 SST 13,524,082 0.1 13,477,689 -0.3 13,562,000 0.6 13,910,000 2.6 Property Tax 14,248,312 0.3 15,207,969 6.7 15,694,000 3.2 16,788,300 7.0 TOT 9,705,846 -2.4 9,968,717 2.7 10,000,000 0.3 10,000,000 0.0 Other Taxes 3,477,239 -21.3 3,665,335 5.4 3,665,000 0.0 3,721,000 1.5 Charges for Services 3,920,615 33.6 3,490,914 -11.0 3,684,000 5.5 3,741,700 1.6 All Other Revenue 7,751,242 6.9 5,874,631 -24.2 7,437,400 26.6 6,831,400 -8.1 Total 72,661,261 0.0 72,023,202 -0.9 74,404,600 3.4 75,875,600 2.0 Sales Tax, Property Tax, and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) make up about 80% of the City’s total revenue, so their performance largely determines overall fiscal stability. After flat or slightly declining revenues in the past two years, modest growth is expected—about 3.4% in FY 2026–27 and 2.0% in FY 2027–28— suggesting a stable but slower growth environment.

Sales tax trends are being shaped more by higher prices than by increased spending. Elevated fuel prices— driven by global oil markets, supply constraints, and California regulations—have pushed gas prices to around $5.97 per gallon. Because sales tax is based on price, this has boosted revenues even as consumers buy less fuel. However, this effect is not unlimited. Over time, higher prices tend to reduce consumption and change behavior, which is why revenue gains do not fully match price increases. In contrast, fuel tax revenues, which depend on gallons sold, remain weaker. Looking ahead, sales tax is expected to grow modestly, supported by steady consumer demand, but it remains sensitive to inflation, interest rates, and broader economic uncertainty.

Property Tax continues to be the City’s most reliable revenue source. Growth is supported by ongoing housing development, particularly at River Oaks II and Olsen South Chandler Ranch, adding about 200 homes per year. The City’s total assessed value has increased to $7.32 billion, up 5% from the prior year, with median home prices reaching $759,000 in 2025. While Proposition 13 limits annual increases—and the City only receives about 17% of the 1% tax rate—new development and property turnover continues

to drive steady gains. In addition, Community Facilities Districts (CFD) are expected to generate about $500,000 annually, helping offset public service costs tied to growth. Overall, Property Tax provides a stable foundation, largely insulated from short-term economic swings.

TOT remains a key but more volatile revenue source tied directly to tourism. Revenues dropped sharply during the pandemic—from $6.2 million in FYE 2019 to $5.1 million in FYE 2020—but rebounded quickly to $9.8 million in FYE 2022. Since then, growth has slowed, with revenues holding relatively flat between $9.7 million and $9.9 million through FYE 2025, and projected to reach about $10.0 million in FYE 2026.

This plateau suggests that while tourism in Paso Robles remains strong, the rapid post-pandemic growth phase has ended. Visitor demand is stable, but factors such as inflation, higher travel costs, and shifting consumer behavior are limiting further gains. Without significant increases in hotel supply, occupancy, or room rates, TOT revenue is likely nearing a short-term ceiling.

Even with slower growth, tourism continues to play a major role in the local economy, supporting jobs, businesses, and City revenues. TOT helps fund essential services and reduces the financial burden on residents. Without tourism, each resident would need to pay an additional $1,779 in annual taxes to maintain current services levels. Regardless, because it depends on discretionary spending, it remains more sensitive to economic changes than other revenue sources. Overall, TOT is expected to remain stable but show limited-to-no growth over the next several years.

General Expenditures
Expenditures by Type FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28
General
Supplemental
Sales Tax General
Supplemental
Sales Tax
Personnel Wages and Benefits 34,589,900 13,991,400 35,982,400 14,620,700 Operating Expenditures 14,175,600 135,800 12,952,700 1,726,500 Debt Repayment 205,500 - 205,500 -
Minor Capital/Equipment 26,000 315,500 26,000 -
Transfer to:

Capital Improvement Program 362,000 18,423,200 650,000 6,300,000 IT Central Services 1,759,500 - 2,040,700 -
Fleet Central Services 2,926,500 163,900 2,962,600 -
Risk Management Services 1,766,100 - 1,528,400 -
Deferred Facility Maintenance - - 600,000 -
Art in Public Places 50,000 - 50,000 -
Estimated EOY Budget Savings (1,950,600) (1,354,300) (1,957,400) (1,572,300) Total 53,910,500 31,675,500 55,040,900 21,074,900
The budget development process begins with a review of current appropriations, with adjustments made only as needed to maintain existing service levels. This “baseline” approach accounts for known cost changes, such as contractual salary increases, updated employee benefit costs, or the elimination of services that are no longer required.

As a service-based organization, personnel costs remain the largest share of General Fund expenditures, accounting for approximately 64–67% of total revenues—consistent with statewide norms. In response to flattening revenues, staff recommends limited personnel adjustments. These include eliminating one police commander position, adding two police lieutenant positions, reclassifying one part-time records technician to full-time, and reclassifying four existing police officer positions to a police corporal

classification over two years. Excluding enterprise-funded personnel, total authorized staffing would increase modestly from 263.44 to 264.97 full-time equivalents (FTE). These changes will be funded through the Supplemental Sales Tax Fund. The proposed budget does not include any new full-time positions within the General Fund.

Costs associated with Information Technology, Fleet, and Risk Management are categorized as Central Service Funds, as they support all City operations, including enterprise activities such as Water, Wastewater, and Airport services. The amounts reflected in this report represent only the General Fund share, with additional details on enterprise funds to be presented at a future meeting.

To address ongoing infrastructure needs, the City has historically allocated approximately $750,000 annually for deferred maintenance. Due to current revenue constraints, staff recommends utilizing reserves in the first year, followed by a $600,000 allocation in the second year. Specific projects are detailed in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) section of the report.

Finally, following City Council’s February 17, 2026 action to reinstate the Arts in Public Spaces Program, the proposed budget includes a transfer equal to 0.5% of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenues to support this initiative. This funding aligns with the Council’s FY 2024–26 goals and is intended to enhance community identity, support economic development, and promote a vibrant cultural environment.

Expenditures by Department FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28
General
Supplemental
Sales Tax General
Supplemental
Sales Tax
City Manager’s Office 3,688,100 - 3,169,500 -
Administrative Services 2,812,200 - 2,906,400 -
Police Department 13,348,800 8,389,900 13,896,300 8,743,100 Fire & Emergency Services 8,103,200 5,468,900 8,240,300 6,979,900 Public Works 8,400,500 583,900 8,255,600 624,200
Community Services 7,260,200 - 7,238,000 -
Community Development 5,384,000 - 5,460,500 -
Transfers to Other Funds 6,864,100 18,587,100 7,831,700 6,300,000 Estimated EOY Budget Savings (1,950,600) (1,354,300) (1,957,400) (1,572,300) Total 53,910,500 31,675,500 55,040,900 21,074,900
The Police Department remains the largest recipient of General Fund resources, accounting for approximately 25% of total revenues, or $13.3 million, consistent with historical trends. In recent years, the department has expanded with support from Measure J-20 supplemental sales tax revenues, which was approved by voters to address public safety and road maintenance. Increased operating costs are primarily driven by added staffing as this past year the City has had its largest sworn staff complement in its history. In addition, supplemental sales tax funds are supporting capital improvements, including the refresh and replacement of Public Safety Center (PSC) carpet and floors, remodel and expansion of the Dispatch Center, with partial State assistance, and upgrades to Records and Community Services Officer (CSO) workspace to accommodate increased personnel.

Fire and Emergency Services and Public Works represent the next largest General Fund expenditures at $8.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively. Together with Police, these investments reflect the City Council’s continued prioritization of public safety and transportation infrastructure. Enhancements to Fire and Emergency Services are fully funded by Measure J-20 and include new personal protective equipment, fire hose replacement, paramedic training, apparatus repairs, and upgrades to the Computer-Aided Dispatch system to improve coordination with San Luis Obispo County. The budget also includes initial

funding for potential participation in a countywide EMS system, with anticipated startup costs to be repaid over time if implemented.

Public Works funding includes key initiatives such as Phase II of the Facility Condition Assessment to address long-term maintenance needs, development of a traffic signal implementation plan to improve circulation, and continuation of the City’s in-house minor road maintenance program.

Other departments—including the City Manager’s Office, Administrative Services, Community Services, and Community Development—reflect relatively modest changes. The budget maintains existing stakeholder funding commitments, including support for the Paso Robles Chamber of Commerce, Main Street, Wine Country Alliance, and El Camino Homeless Organization. It also includes targeted investments in priority projects such as Spaceport licensing (funded over two years), ADA compliance upgrades to the City’s website, development of a Parks Master Plan, replacement of sports field equipment, updates to the Housing Element, and a North Spring Street Corridor Study.

Lastly, it should be noted that, historically, the City does not expend 100% of its annual appropriations.

Consistent with past practice and common budgeting standards among peer agencies, staff has incorporated an estimated 4% savings in year-end expenditures. This assumption reflects typical operational efficiencies, project timing, and unforeseen delays, and provides a more realistic projection of actual expenditures while maintaining prudent fiscal planning.

Key Operating Budget Highlights
 Targeted Public Safety Staffing Adjustments
o Police Department reorganization eliminates 1 Commander and adds 2 Lieutenants o Reclassification of 1 part-time Records Technician to full-time o Reclassification of 4 Officers to Corporal over two years o Net staffing increase of fewer than 2 FTE
 Sustained Investment in Core Emergency Services
o Fire & Emergency Services enhancements funded through Measure J-20 o Includes PPE and fire hose replacement, paramedic training, apparatus repairs, and CAD system upgrades
o Initial funding to evaluate participation in a countywide EMS system o Fire Department Strategic Plan
 Continued Support for Community Partners and Cultural Programs o Annual funding maintained for key partner organizations:
 Chamber of Commerce ($115,000)
 Main Street program ($117,000)
 El Camino Homeless Organization ($222,000)
 Wine Country Alliance ($85,000)
o Funding levels remain flat due to current fiscal conditions o Ongoing support for the Arts in Public Places Program, funded at 0.5% of TOT revenues o Funding for the development of a parks master plan
o Funding for sports field equipment replacement at Barney Schwartz Park o Funding for the North Spring Street Corridor Study
 Fiscal Prudence
o City reserves at 31 percent, above the City’s policy level of 30 percent o Retaining full balance of Section 115 Pension Trust
o No additional General Fund positions due to fiscal headwinds

Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Capital projects are typically one-time, high-cost investments in physical assets, such as buildings, roads, parks, or major equipment, that have a useful life extending beyond one year and are not part of routine operating expenses. The CIP is designed to protect, preserve, and enhance the City’s infrastructure, extend useful life of public facilities, and improve and enhance the delivery of City services.

The CIP projects are presented as a revolving five-year program that acts as a guide for identifying current and future fiscal requirements. The current year acts as the City’s annual capital budget. The CIP does not encompass all of the City’s capital expenditures; rather, it is developed through the prioritization of resources for larger-scale infrastructure and multi-year projects.

There are no rigid or prescriptive criteria governing which projects are included in the CIP versus those deferred to future fiscal years. Instead, project selection reflects a comprehensive staff evaluation process that carefully balances available resources against competing project demands, with the goal of prioritizing those initiatives that offer the greatest community impact and strategic value.

In making these determinations, staff consider several key factors, including:
 The estimated total cost of the project and the extent of its anticipated benefits to the community.  Alignment with City Council goals, as well as established community goals, prior master plans, and adopted strategic plans, which guide the allocation of limited resources.  Projected ongoing operational and maintenance costs associated with new or expanded facilities.  Project readiness and timing, with priority generally given to projects that are “shovel ready.”  Availability of external funding, including projects supported in whole or in part by grant funding.  Identification and reliability of funding sources, including available balances in Measures J-20 and I-24.
 Projects that are necessary to maintain compliance with applicable state and federal laws and regulations.

It is also important to note that General Fund resources are typically limited for capital projects and must be budgeted judiciously. As a result, these funds are often reserved for projects that lack a dedicated funding source, unlike public safety and roadway projects, which are predominately supported by Measures J-20 and I-24, respectively. Consequently, there is often a greater number of unfunded or underfunded needs than available resources in areas such as parks, recreation, libraries, stormwater infrastructure, and general facility improvements, requiring additional prioritization and phasing over multiple fiscal years.

Key Capital Improvement Program Highlights
 $25 million over the next two fiscal years allocated for local road improvements and repairs  $1.2 million in upgrades to the Public Safety Center to ensure effective and efficient delivery of public safety services
 $36 million of major infrastructure investment over the next two fiscal years including the 24th Street bridge upgrade and the state-funded Niblick Road Active Transportation Project.  $3.2 million to modernize the City’s library
 $1.4 million in projects that are intended to improve user experiences across the City’s parks and recreation system

Presented below is a summary of proposed CIP projects, including estimated costs and the fiscal year in which each project is scheduled. More detailed information—such as project descriptions, funding sources, and implementation timelines—will be provided during staff’s presentation and included in the final adopted budget document.

Current
Budget FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029 FYE 2030 FYE 2031
City Facility Projects
Transit Center Bathroom 82,370 620,000 - - - -
PSC Carpet/Floor/Paint
Refresh - 218,000 - - - -
PSC Dispatch Remodel - 752,000 - - - -
Library Remodel 199,346 - 3,231,000 - - -
Centennial Gym Bleachers - - 100,000 - - -
PSC Records/CSO
Remodel - - 200,000 - - -
Senior Center Carpet - - 20,000 - - -
Centennial Park
Floor/Paint Refresh - - - 95,000 - -
Centennial Park Security - - - 200,000 - -
Fire Station No. 2
Remodel - - - 500,000 5,000,000 -
PSC Parking Lot Resurface - - - 30,000 - -
Senior/Veterans Center
Parking - - - 100,000 - -
Fire Station No. 3 Phase II
(design only) - - - - - 500,000
Total Facility Projects 281,716 1,590,000 3,551,000 925,000 5,000,000 500,000 Parks & Recreation
Projects
Centennial Park BBQ
Replacement 247,689 65,600 - - - -
Centennial Pool Filtration/
Chlorine Replacement
32,148 26,000 - - - -
BSP Walking Path Repairs - 79,500 79,500 - - -
Municipal Pool Deck
Replacement - 100,000 200,000 - - -
BSP Handrail/Signage - 50,000 - - - -
City Park Gazebo/Path
Repairs - 20,000 - - - -
Municipal Pool Parking Lot - 13,700 - - - -
Municipal Pool Therapy
Pool HVAC Replacement - 100,000 - - - -
Robbins Field Bleacher
Replacement - 80,000 - - - -
Centennial Pool Deck
Replacement - - 100,000 - - -
Robbins Field Bathroom
Replacement - - 500,000 - - -
Centennial Park Bathroom
Replacement - - - 500,000 - -
Larry Moore Park
Redevelopment - - - - 8,000,000 -
Municipal Pool Locker
Room Repaint - - - - 25,000 -

Current
Budget FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029 FYE 2030 FYE 2031
BSP Retaining Wall
Replacement - - - - - 15,000
Total Parks & Recreation
Projects 279,837 534,800 879,500 500,000 8,025,000 15,000 Road Maintenance
Projects
Riverside (17th to 24th Sts) 1,142,950 1,400,000 - - - - Creston Road Phase II 10,160,479 7,735,700
16th/18th/30th/32nd/36th
(Vine to Spring) 3,955,311 425,000 - - - -
Orchard Bungalow Phase I 1,791,667 7,225,000 - - - -
Park/Pine Streets (14th to
24th Streets) 1,927,775 250,000 - 13,000,000 - -
Capitol Hill - 1,500,000 - - - -
Orchard Bungalow Phase
II - 250,000 6,000,000 - - -
Vine St (10th to 16th Sts)
Chestnut/11th Streets
Fresno/Hilltop/Grove
- - 100,000 250,000 6,000,000 -
Vine St (13th to 16th)
4 th St (Spring to Vine) - - - 500,000 1,650,000
Olive/Chestnut (12th-16th)
13th, 14th, 15th Sts
(Chestnut to Vine)
- - - - 800,000 6,300,000
Airport Road/Hwy 46 East
(design only) - - - - - 750,000
Total Road Maintenance
Projects 18,978,182 18,785,700 6,100,000 13,750,000 8,450,000 7,050,000 Stormwater Projects
23rd and Vine Streets 30,000 - 300,000 - - -
21st St Green Strip Repairs - 80,000 - - - -
Downtown City Park
(12th/Pine) - 50,300 200,000 - - -
North River Slope Repair
(across from Viborg) - 100,000 - - - -
Storm Drain Master Plan
Phase II - 212,000 - - - -
Melody Basin Retrofit - - 100,000 1,000,000 - -
Grand Canyon Basin
Retrofit - - - 100,000 1,000,000 -
Oriole Basin
Reconstruction - - - 100,000 - -
14th at Railroad Basin - - - - 100,000 1,000,000
S. River Road Anchored
Mesh - - - - - 150,000
Total Stormwater Projects 30,000 442,300 600,000 1,200,000 1,100,000 1,150,000 Transportation Projects
24th Street Bridge 1,166,411 10,800,000 9,100,000 - - - 12th St Sidewalk 38,787 600,000 - - - -
Niblick Road Corridor 2,346,477 - 14,707,500 - - -
Union Road Undercrossing
Study - 465,000 - - - -
ADA Transition Plan 355,811 - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000

Current
Budget FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029 FYE 2030 FYE 2031
US 101/Hwy 46 West
Roundabouts (Phase III) 1,876,554 - - 29,000,000 - -
North River Bike/Ped Path 2,040,708 - - 13,800,000 - -
Huer Huero Creek Bridge 1,720,874 - - - 38,000,000 -
Union Road Overcrossing 3,947,795 - - - - 71,000,000
Total Transportation
Projects 13,493,417 11,865,000 23,857,500 42,850,000 38,050,000 71,050,000 Total CIP 33,063,152 33,217,800 34,988,000 59,225,000 60,625,000 79,765,000 Many of the projects identified in the CIP are already underway and require additional appropriations to reach completion, while others were included in the adopted 5-Year CIP and are now advancing into active phases. It is important to note that not all projects are fully funded at this time. For example, the Library Remodel project anticipates utilizing $807,700 in Library Developer Impact Fees, with an estimated $2,423,300 in remaining funding needs. Other major projects with currently unsecured funding include the Huer Huero Creek Bridge ($38.0 million, FYE 2030), US 101 and Highway 46 West Roundabouts ($29.0 million, FYE 2029), North River Road Bike and Pedestrian Path ($11.9 million, FYE 2029), Larry Moore Park Redevelopment ($8.0 million, FYE 2030), and the Union Road Overcrossing ($71.0 million, FYE 2031).

In addition, the CIP budget includes funding for a feasibility study to evaluate options for addressing the grade separation at State Route 46 East and Airport Road. The outcome of this study may identify an alternative approach that could replace the currently planned Union Road Overcrossing and Huer Huero Creek Bridge projects with a more cost-effective and efficient solution. As a result, the CIP should be viewed as a long-range planning tool that is inherently dynamic and subject to change. The budget will be amended as projects evolve, funding opportunities are identified, and priorities are refined. Importantly, no project will proceed to construction or implementation until sufficient funding has been identified and secured, ensuring the City maintains responsible and sustainable fiscal practices.

CIP projects are funded and financed through a variety of general purpose (unrestricted), grant and special purpose revenue sources. These include:

FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029 FYE 2030 FYE 2031
Proposed Funding Sources
General Fund 362,000 650,000 1,250,000 1,150,000 1,200,000 Facility Replacement Fund 185,300 720,000 925,000 25,000 15,000 Supplemental Sales Tax 18,423,200 6,300,000 14,250,000 13,450,000 7,550,000 Transit Fund 1,220,000 190,700 1,062,000 - -
SB 1 Fund 880,500 - - - -
Transportation DIF 2,965,000 3,550,800 738,000 - -
Library DIF - 807,700 - - -
Stormwater DIF 130,300 - - - -
Bike/Ped DIF - - 128,600 - -
Aquatics DIF 200,000 200,000 - - -
Grants 8,752,000 20,066,000 - - -
Unsecured - 2,423,300 40,871,400 46,000,000 71,000,000
Total 33,217,800 34,988,000 59,225,000 60,625,000 79,765,000

General Fund
The main operating and capital fund of the City. This fund gets most of its revenues from taxes (e.g., sales, property, and transient occupancy)—has no restrictions—and is typically expended on any project or improvement deemed appropriate and necessary by City Council.

Measure J-20/Measure I-24 Supplemental Sales Tax
In 2012, the voters of Paso Robles approved Measure E-12, a half-cent supplemental sales tax (SST) that generates approximately $6.0-7.0 million per year. This measure had an automatic sunset in 2025 in which Measure I-24 renewed the tax measure indefinitely. Measure I-24 is a general tax intended to fund the City’s street repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation projects.

In 2020, the voters of Paso Robles approved Measure J-20, a one-cent supplemental SST. Like Measure E-12, Measure J-20 is a general tax with the main priorities towards fire and emergency services, police services, and street repair and maintenance, as approved by City Council in Resolution 20-118.

City Facility Repair & Replacement Fund
Established in FY 2018-19, this fund was created as a general funded set aside account to help fund major repairs and/or replacements of City parks, facilities, and trail amenities.

Development Impact Fees (DIF)
Development impact fees are assessed and collected which are used to construct public facilities due to the need for expanded services. Fees are collected for transportation, public safety facilities, general government facilities, parks and recreation facilities, library facilities, bridge development, storm drain development, bike and pedestrian pathways, and water and sewer connections and are restricted to the use of expanding said facilities.

Transit Fund
Funds used specifically for transit maintenance and improvement projects as specified by the Transportation Development Act.

Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation (SB1)
Revenue source is a part of the taxation of fuel and vehicle registration as passed by State legislature through Senate Bill 1. This revenue source provides funding for roadway maintenance, repair, and reconstruction.

Federal, State, and Local Grants
Federal, State, and Local Grants: The City actively seeks grants to fund—at least in part—some of the more costly CIP projects. These grants include, but are not limited to, Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), Highway Bridge Program (HBP), Urban State Highway Account (USHA), Regional State Highway Account (RSHA), and Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).

Conclusion
FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28
General
Supplemental
Sales Tax General
Supplemental
Sales Tax
Total Estimated Revenues 54,061,600 21,795,000 55,010,600 22,644,500 Total Proposed Appropriations 53,910,500 31,675,500 55,040,900 21,074,900 Budget Surplus/(Deficit) 151,100 (9,880,500) (30,300) 1,569,600 Estimated Reserves, BOY 16,522,504 15,858,817 16,673,604 5,978,317 Estimated Reserves, EOY 16,673,604 5,978,317 16,643,304 7,547,917 Reserves as % of Revenue 31% N/A 30% N/A
In summary, the General Fund is structurally balanced, with projected reserves of $16.6 million as of June 30, 2028, meeting the City Council’s policy target of maintaining a minimum 30% reserve. The Supplemental Sales Tax Fund, which is not subject to the same reserve requirements due to its voterapproved purpose of enhancing public safety and road maintenance, is recommended for appropriations of $9.9 million in excess of revenues in FY 2026–27—primarily for capital road projects—reducing its projected balance to approximately $6.0 million. It is also important to note that Measure J-20, the onecent supplemental sales tax, is scheduled to sunset in 2032. Given that this funding currently supports ongoing staffing and service levels, it would be fiscally prudent to consider seeking voter approval for an extension ahead of its sunset.

Measure J-20, together with Measure I-24, has been a key funding source supporting both public safety and infrastructure needs across the City. These revenues have allowed the City to maintain service levels while making sustained investments in Police, Fire and Emergency Services, and Public Works.

To date, these measures have supported staffing including 21 Police Officers, 2 Sergeants, a Commander, Deputy Police Chief, 2 Dispatchers, Dispatch Supervisor, Records Supervisor, Executive Assistant, 18 Firefighters/Engineers (including paramedic staffing), an Administrative Captain, Training Captain, Deputy Fire Chief, Fire Prevention Specialist, and 5 Street Maintenance Technicians. These investments directly support emergency response, preparedness, and ongoing service delivery.

Since 2020, approximately $13.5 million has been invested in Police services, $25.1 million in Fire and Emergency Services (including the training tower and Fire Station 3), and about $1.09 million in Public Works road maintenance, totaling a little over $40 million in roadway and public safety-related investments.

Measure J-20 is currently set to sunset in 2032. Given its importance to ongoing service levels and infrastructure maintenance, the City should consider early community engagement and planning discussions regarding a potential continuation measure on the 2028 ballot. Early outreach will help ensure long-term financial stability, informed public understanding, and continuity of public safety and maintenance services.

Finally, while the proposed budget is balanced, it remains a policy document that reflects current priorities and assumptions. Should City Council identify a higher priority or unmet goal through its Visioning and Goal Setting process, the budget can and will be adjusted accordingly. Any such changes that increase appropriations will require corresponding trade-offs, including reductions in other areas, use of reserves

below the established policy threshold, and/or identification of alternative funding sources, such as the Section 115 Trust.

Fiscal Impact
There are no fiscal impacts by receiving and filing this presentation.

CEQA
The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Recommendation
Receive and file this report and provide any desired direction on the preparation of the Fiscal Years 2026- 27 and 2027-28 budget items outlined within the report.

Attachments

1. Preliminary Budget Report – Financial Statements

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

FUND OVERVIEW
General Fund
FY 2020-21
Actual
FY 2021-22
Actual
FY 2022-23
Actual
FY 2023-24
Actual
FY 2024-25
Actual
FY 2025-26
Projected
FY 2026-27
Budget
FY 2027-28
Budget
FY 2028-29
Forecast
FY 2029-30
Forecast
FY 2030-31
Forecast

REVENUES
Taxes
## Sales and Use Tax $ 12,077,864 $ 13,472,626 $ 13,524,049 $ 13,624,123 $ 13,277,120 $ 13,604,576 $ 13,581,200 $ 13,928,200 $ 14,575,000 $ 15,042,000 $ 15,493,300 ## Property Taxes 11,723,491 12,317,408 12,873,711 14,210,193 14,248,312 15,207,969 15,694,000 16,788,300 17,627,700 18,509,100 19,434,600 ## Transient Occupancy Tax 7,132,691 9,803,368 9,824,200 9,946,197 9,705,846 9,968,717 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,500,000 10,290,000 10,598,700 ## All Other Taxes 4,928,369 5,125,133 4,400,080 4,418,448 3,477,239 3,665,335 3,665,000 3,721,000 3,778,000 3,836,000 3,896,000 Subtotal Taxes 35,862,415 40,718,535 40,622,040 42,198,961 40,708,517 42,446,597 42,940,200 44,437,500 46,480,700 47,677,100 49,422,600 0 ##Charges for Services 2,621,071 2,528,717 2,547,621 2,935,001 3,920,615 3,490,914 3,684,000 3,741,700 3,886,000 3,924,900 4,038,000 ## Licenses and Permits 561,801 786,474 1,088,059 1,364,575 1,305,241 858,511 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,326,000 1,352,500 1,379,600 ## Fines and Forfeitures 134,811 97,187 148,380 189,949 271,964 218,580 251,100 261,100 200,000 200,000 200,000 ## Intergovernmental Revenues 1,351,227 657,315 890,611 740,297 1,139,954 1,212,340 555,000 555,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 ##Use of Money and Property 2,932,242 22,727 1,244,314 3,980,539 3,439,027 2,255,826 2,585,800 2,585,800 2,311,500 2,311,500 2,311,500 ##Other Revenues 138,055 294,953 93,140 73,606 51,034 78,746 65,000 65,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 ## Interfund Transfers In 1,936,667 907,160 971,019 902,286 1,544,022 1,250,628 2,680,500 2,064,500 2,105,800 2,147,900 2,190,900 Total Revenues 45,538,289 46,013,068 47,605,184 52,385,214 52,380,374 51,812,142 54,061,600 55,010,600 56,970,000 58,273,900 60,202,600

EXPENDITURES
City Council/City Manager's Office
Personnel Services 1,022,041 1,042,924 1,335,474 1,457,079 1,633,019 1,359,530 1,686,800 1,738,400 1,784,700 1,836,900 1,883,800 Operating Expenses 772,110 932,959 1,223,878 993,949 1,241,471 1,420,128 2,001,300 1,431,100 1,240,600 1,271,500 1,302,900 Capital Outlay - - 11,640 - - - - - - - -
Total City Manager's Office 1,794,151 1,975,883 2,570,992 2,451,028 2,874,490 2,779,658 3,688,100 3,169,500 3,025,300 3,108,400 3,186,700 0 Administrative Services
Personnel Services 1,887,533 1,253,498 1,401,404 1,503,654 1,643,374 1,708,000 1,954,400 2,043,400 2,120,800 2,202,700 2,266,000 Operating Expenses 2,944,086 856,713 906,331 1,001,858 1,282,440 1,037,075 857,800 863,000 877,600 899,600 922,100 Total Administrative Services 4,831,619 2,110,211 2,307,735 2,505,512 2,925,814 2,745,075 2,812,200 2,906,400 2,998,400 3,102,300 3,188,100 0 Police
## Personnel Services 8,435,087 9,524,649 10,461,568 10,869,676 11,858,383 12,192,627 10,991,400 11,599,500 12,086,400 12,627,600 13,042,000 Operating Expenses 1,184,206 1,342,056 1,204,037 1,688,031 1,694,223 1,889,016 2,357,400 2,296,800 2,362,700 2,421,600 2,481,900 Capital Outlay 24,800 - 23,263 - 19,284 14,657 - - - - - Total Police 9,644,093 10,866,705 11,688,868 12,557,707 13,571,890 14,096,300 13,348,800 13,896,300 14,449,100 15,049,200 15,523,900 0 Fire and Emergency Services
## Personnel Services 6,903,397 7,030,867 6,390,606 6,718,595 7,187,235 7,238,361 7,254,500 7,440,500 7,619,300 7,774,600 7,960,900 Operating Expenses 488,150 386,169 687,170 642,102 679,749 732,653 848,700 799,800 823,900 847,200 871,200 Capital Outlay 164,687 143,662 120,244 263,877 268,223 101,557 - - - - - Total Fire and Emergency Services 7,556,234 7,560,698 7,198,020 7,624,574 8,135,207 8,072,571 8,103,200 8,240,300 8,443,200 8,621,800 8,832,100 0 Attachment 1

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

FUND OVERVIEW
General Fund
FY 2020-21
Actual
FY 2021-22
Actual
FY 2022-23
Actual
FY 2023-24
Actual
FY 2024-25
Actual
FY 2025-26
Projected
FY 2026-27
Budget
FY 2027-28
Budget
FY 2028-29
Forecast
FY 2029-30
Forecast
FY 2030-31
Forecast
Public Works
## Personnel Services 1,490,143 1,381,505 2,525,458 3,268,659 3,392,183 3,780,036 4,002,100 4,138,400 4,260,600 4,395,600 4,516,500 Operating Expenses 1,999,847 2,306,615 2,349,642 3,446,225 3,617,361 3,508,711 4,192,900 3,911,700 4,008,600 4,102,200 4,218,700 Debt Service 136,978 136,978 136,978 205,469 205,469 205,468 205,500 205,500 205,500 205,500 205,500 Capital Outlay 30,358 - 10,864 63,582 77,921 33,833 - - - - - Total Public Works 3,657,326 3,825,098 5,022,942 6,983,935 7,292,934 7,528,048 8,400,500 8,255,600 8,474,700 8,703,300 8,940,700 0 Community Services
## Personnel Services 2,609,888 2,805,673 2,774,444 3,493,199 3,809,779 4,174,674 4,583,400 4,728,400 4,852,800 4,980,500 5,103,100 Operating Expenses 1,864,149 2,176,527 1,964,029 1,564,433 2,348,456 2,516,717 2,650,800 2,483,600 2,616,500 2,579,100 2,643,300 Debt Service 68,491 68,491 68,491 - - - - - - - -
Capital Outlay 29,028 50,392 18,811 11,204 346,991 11,000 26,000 26,000 26,500 27,200 27,900 Total Community Services 4,571,556 5,101,083.00 4,825,775 5,068,836 6,505,226 6,702,391 7,260,200 7,238,000 7,495,800 7,586,800 7,774,300 0 Community Development
### Personnel Services 2,113,914 2,427,075 2,712,611 2,712,864 2,997,385 3,700,372 4,117,300 4,293,800 3,249,700 3,360,400 3,454,400 Operating Expenses 882,445 736,118 757,687 923,537 858,833 1,549,200 1,266,700 1,166,700 965,700 989,800 1,014,300 Capital Outlay - - - 61,391 201,836 - - - - -
Total Community Development 2,996,359 3,163,193 3,470,298 3,636,401 3,917,609 5,451,408 5,384,000 5,460,500 4,215,400 4,350,200 4,468,700 0 Utilities (Solid Waste)
Operating Expenses 309,560 437,239 - - - - - - - - -
Debt Service 69,299 - - - - - - - - - -
Capital Outlay - 32,325 - - - - - - - - -
Total Utilities 378,859 469,564 - - - - - - - - -
Transfers to Other Funds
Capital Project Fund 3,381,881 1,324,320 7,312,256 2,128,858 3,003,822 80,000 362,000 650,000 1,250,000 1,150,000 1,200,000 IT Central Service Fund 208,700 1,122,298 1,448,164 1,569,602 1,978,100 1,991,200 1,759,500 2,040,700 2,201,300 2,163,600 2,185,600 Fleet Central Service Fund 1,253,657 2,081,826 2,398,523 2,332,118 2,493,625 2,522,108 2,926,500 2,962,600 3,451,400 3,484,700 3,516,200 Risk Mgmt Central Service Fund - 1,783,370 1,358,700 1,427,700 689,395 1,715,700 1,766,100 1,528,400 1,867,500 2,009,800 2,089,200 Facility Replacement Fund 895,279 655,000 2,150,111 787,626 829,396 750,000 - 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Pension Trust Fund - 421,000 - 556,900 - - - - - - -
Solid Waste Fund - - 572,942 756,630 - - - - - - -
Landfill Closure/Postclosure Fund 180,000 180,000 - - - - - - - - - Debt Service Fund 291,312 285,526 289,000 - - - - 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Art in Public Places Fund - - - - - - 50,000 50,000 52,500 51,500 53,000 All Other Transfers - - 2,968,667 1,051,600 - - - - - - - Total All Other Expenditures 6,210,829 7,853,340 18,498,363 10,611,034 8,994,338 7,059,008 6,864,100 7,831,700 10,622,700 10,659,600 10,844,000 Attachment 1

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

FUND OVERVIEW
General Fund
FY 2020-21
Actual
FY 2021-22
Actual
FY 2022-23
Actual
FY 2023-24
Actual
FY 2024-25
Actual
FY 2025-26
Projected
FY 2026-27
Budget
FY 2027-28
Budget
FY 2028-29
Forecast
FY 2029-30
Forecast
FY 2030-31
Forecast
Estimated Budget Savings (1,950,600) (1,957,400) (1,954,800) (2,011,600) (2,067,200) Total Expenditures 41,641,026 42,925,775 55,582,993 51,439,027 54,217,508 54,434,459 53,910,500 55,040,900 57,769,800 59,170,000 60,691,300 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 3,897,263 3,087,293 (7,977,809) 946,187 (1,837,134) (2,622,317) 151,100 (30,300) (799,800) (896,100) (488,700) FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR $ 24,926,284 $ 28,013,577 $ 20,035,768 $ 20,981,955 $ 19,144,821 $ 16,522,504 $ 16,673,604 $ 16,643,304 $ 15,843,504 $ 14,947,404 $ 14,458,704 RESERVES AS % OF REVENUE 55% 61% 42% 40% 37% 32% 31% 30% 28% 26% 24% Capital Projects
Wayfinding Signage $ 63,975 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2955 Union Rd Parcel 17,906 - - - - - - - - - -
4301 Second Wind Way 950,000 - - - - - - - - - -
Citywide User Fee Study 100,000 - - - - - - - - - -
Niblick Rd Signal Synchronization 300,000 - - - - - - - - - - 911 Data Communications 1,950,000 (52,270) - - - - - - - - - Citywide Fiber Optic Network - 766,990 - 58,500 - - - - - - - ADA Transition Plan Setaside - 500,000 374,227 500,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 DT Parking Lot Improvements - 93,000 800,000 - 800,000 - - - - - - Niblick Rd Street Corridor - 16,600 2,854,000 (2,344,000) - - - - - - - Drainage/Basin Improvements - - 672,000 - 223,017 30,000 312,000 600,000 1,200,000 1,100,000 1,150,000 Huer Huero Creek Bridge ROW - - 1,030,000 - - - - - - - - Road Maintenance Program - - 116,029 - - - - - - - -
Traffic Signal Enhancements - - 100,000 150,000 - - - - - - - Mill Rd Parallel Route/Annexation - - 430,000 130,000 500,000 - - - - - - South Vine St Bridge - - 868,000 1,333,100 1,197,305 - - - - - - Parking Structure Feasibility Study - - 68,000 (17,189) - - - - - - - Pioneer Park Relocation - - - 783,100 - - - - - - -
City Corporation Yard - - - 218,000 - - - - - - -
North River Rd Bike/Pedestrian - - - 1,000,000 - - - - - - - City Hall Lobby Doors - - - 12,225 - - - - - - -
Bolen St Sinkhole Remediation - - - 305,122 - - - - - - - Library Improvements - - - - 233,500 - - - - - -
Total 3,381,881 1,324,320 7,312,256 2,128,858 3,003,822 80,000 362,000 650,000 1,250,000 1,150,000 1,200,000 Attachment 1

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

FUND OVERVIEW
Supplemental Sales Tax Fund
FY 2020-21
Actual
FY 2021-22
Actual
FY 2022-23
Actual
FY 2023-24
Actual
FY 2024-25
Actual
FY 2025-26
Projected
FY 2026-27
Budget
FY 2027-28
Budget
FY 2028-29
Forecast
FY 2029-30
Forecast
FY 2030-31
Forecast

REVENUES
4Measure J-20 Supplemental Tax $ 3,080,064 $ 13,142,001 $ 13,327,879 $ 13,509,741 $ 13,524,082 $ 13,477,689 $ 13,562,000 $ 13,910,000 $ 14,429,200 $ 14,891,600 $ 15,338,400 4Measure I-24 Supplemental Tax 5,790,874 6,926,178 6,694,444 6,765,568 6,756,805 6,733,371 6,781,000 6,955,000 7,214,600 7,445,800 7,669,200 ## Intergovernmental Revenues 320,238 499,852 466,665 3,846,718 308,687 3,435,952 452,000 779,500 585,000 390,000 - ##Use of Money and Property 7,246 (250,162) 68,260 731,173 1,170,660 739,776 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 ##Other Revenues 187,145 53,140 - 4,096 - - - - - - -
Interfund Transfers In 748,500 500,000 125,773 - - 3,825,439 - - - - - Total Revenues 10,134,067 20,871,009 20,683,021 24,857,296 21,760,234 28,212,227 21,795,000 22,644,500 23,228,800 23,727,400 24,007,600 -22.8% 3.9% 2.6% 2.2% 1.2%

EXPENDITURES
Police
Personnel Services 57,507 355,883 898,060 1,973,827 3,205,360 4,259,948 8,389,900 8,743,100 9,068,100 9,365,900 9,544,200 Operating Expenses - 64,404 34,930 807 284,220 52,753 - - - - - Capital Outlay - - 45,101 65,910 86,423 96,835 - - - - - Total Police 57,507 420,287 978,091 2,040,544 3,576,003 4,409,536 8,389,900 8,743,100 9,068,100 9,365,900 9,544,200

90.3% 4.2% 3.7% 3.3% 1.9%
Fire and Emergency Services
Personnel Services 95,096 666,468 1,969,370 2,657,836 3,215,589 4,007,540 5,077,600 5,318,400 5,561,500 5,714,400 5,876,700 Operating Expenses 7,074 15,945 3,400 9,038 9,606 8,606 75,800 1,661,500 - - - Capital Outlay - 30,672 32,100 21,598 21,255 221,047 315,500 - - - - Total Fire and Emergency Services 102,170 713,085 2,004,870 2,688,472 3,246,450 4,237,193 5,468,900 6,979,900 5,561,500 5,714,400 5,876,700

29.1% 27.6% -20.3% 2.8% 2.8%
Public Works
Personnel Services 13,487 153,121 118,752 143,003 202,878 454,510 523,900 559,200 590,400 619,700 638,700 Operating Expenses - 70 - - - - 60,000 65,000 63,800 65,400 67,000 Total Public Works 13,487 153,191 118,752 143,003 202,878 454,510 583,900 624,200 654,200 685,100 705,700

28.5% 6.9% 4.8% 4.7% 3.0%
Transfers to Other Funds
Fleet Central Service Fund - - 587,000 2,504,000 - 680,000 163,900 - - - - Capital Project Fund 8,525,921 7,747,522 10,353,062 4,746,526 13,645,158 46,661,452 18,423,200 6,300,000 14,250,000 13,450,000 7,550,000 Total Transfers to Other Funds 8,525,921 7,747,522 10,940,062 7,250,526 13,645,158 47,341,452 18,587,100 6,300,000 14,250,000 13,450,000 7,550,000 Budget for Savings (1,354,300) (1,572,300) (1,170,400) (1,206,400) (1,233,700) Total Expenditures 8,699,085 9,034,085 14,041,775 12,122,545 20,670,489 56,442,691 31,675,500 21,074,900 28,363,400 28,009,000 22,442,900 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 1,434,982 11,836,924 6,641,246 12,734,751 1,089,745 (28,230,464) (9,880,500) 1,569,600 (5,134,600) (4,281,600) 1,564,700 FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR $ 11,786,615 $ 23,623,539 $ 30,264,785 $ 42,999,536 $ 44,089,281 $ 15,858,817 $ 5,978,317 $ 7,547,917 $ 2,413,317 $ (1,868,283) $ (303,583) Capital Projects
Road Maintenance Program 7,208,896 5,862,399 5,424,556 4,130,041 12,515,282 42,420,338 17,905,200 6,100,000 13,750,000 8,450,000 7,050,000 Automated License Plate Reader System 100,455 - - - - - - - - - - Public Safety 911 Equipment 1,216,570 - 131,374 - - - - - - - - Police Substation/Evidence Storage Design - 143,972 122,048 - - - - - - - - Dispatch Center Remodel - - - - - 300,000 - - - -
Records/CSO Office Remodel - - - - - - 200,000 - - -
Fire Station No. 3 - 1,741,151 4,484,428 517,833 383,712 - - - - - - PSC Camera System Upgrade - - 190,656 85,930 - - - - - - - Attachment 1

FY 2020-21
Actual
FY 2021-22
Actual
FY 2022-23
Actual
FY 2023-24
Actual
FY 2024-25
Actual
FY 2025-26
Projected
FY 2026-27
Budget
FY 2027-28
Budget
FY 2028-29
Forecast
FY 2029-30
Forecast
FY 2030-31
Forecast
PSC Refresh - Carpet/Paint - - - - - - 218,000 - - - -
Fire Training Tower - - - 12,722 746,164 4,241,114 - - - - - Fire Station No. 2 Remodel - - - - - - - 500,000 5,000,000 - Fire Station No. 3 Phase 2 - - - - - - - - - - 500,000
Total 8,525,921 7,747,522 10,353,062 4,746,526 13,645,158 46,661,452 18,423,200 6,300,000 14,250,000 13,450,000 7,550,000 - - - - - - - - - - -
Road Maintenance Program
Creston Rd Phase 1 38,367 46,403 337,674 1,828,356 4,795,622 3,813,596 - - - - - Spring St (24th to 36th) 2,257,974 5,702 - - - - - - - - - 24th St Bridge Rehabilitation 83,198 140,945 420,542 89,481 657,943 1,218,409 - - - - - Dry Creek Road Improvements 2,940,745 1,042,725 54,925 - - - - - - - - Union Road along BSP 360,393 - - - - - - - - - -
13th St/Niblick Bridge Deck - - - - 38,683 3,271,317 - - - - - West Side Road Repairs 1,274,617 64,864 - - - - - - - - - Jardine Road Pavement Repairs - 366,840 - - - - - - - - - Rambouillet/Nicklaus Area 134,353 2,508,489 9 - - - - - - - - Olive/16th-20th Street Repairs 119,249 1,486,722 15,500 - - - - - - - - 24th Street (Spring and Oak St) - - - - - 40,000 - - - - - Appaloosa Dr - 21,313 652,649 - - - - - - - -
Melody Dr/Patricia Ln - 67,321 1,960,192 - - - - - - - - Rolling Hill Estates - 24,365 12,195 1,074,918 - - - - - - - Country Club Area - 86,710 1,312,749 - - - - - - - -
17th Street (Chestnut to Spring) - - 10,300 - 783,587 - - - - - - Riverside - 17th to 24th - - 46,444 1,400 8,276 1,143,880 1,400,000 - - - - Various Traffic Sign/Striping - - 441,032 35,256 2,420 121,292 - - - - - Sunset/Panorama Street - - 17,681 3,255 51,390 1,816,185 - - - - - West Side Slurry/Chip Seal - - 39,418 543,343 - - - - - - - Arciero Ct/Mesa Rd - - - - 21,874 1,403,126 - - - - -
Dallons/Tractor Area - - - - 46,188 1,843,812 - - - - - Elm Court, Capitol Hill, Palm Court - - - 38,077 279,976 - - - - - - Golden Hill - Rolling Hills to Creston Rd - - - 75,130 2,564,303 - - - - - - Merry Hill - 15th Street - Terrace Hill - - - 26,439 692,671 - - - - - - Serenade/Holstein-Bahama/St Andrews - - - 72,128 846,942 39,969 - - - - - Creston Rd Phase 2 - - - 320,085 300,650 10,249,144 7,735,700 - - - - Melody Drive - - - - 153,847 852,664 - - - - -
16th/18th/30th/32nd/36th Vine to Spring - - - - 39,174 4,005,826 425,000 - - - - Fontana/Linne - - - - 1,231,573 - - - - - -
Intersection Ehancements - - - - - 311,700 - - - - -
Orchard Bungalow Phase 1 - - - - - 1,800,000 7,225,000 - - - - Park & Pine Streets, 14th to 24th - - - - - 1,950,000 250,000 - 13,000,000 - - Combine/Danley/Germaine/Oakwood - - - - - 970,000 - - - - - Sierra Bonita/Turtle Creek Area - - 103,246 22,173 163 7,569,418 - - - - - Capitol Hill - - - - - 619,500
Orchard Bungalow Phase 2 - - - - - - 250,000 6,000,000 - - - Vine St, 10th to 16th|Chestnut/11th St|Fres - - - - - - - 100,000 250,000 6,000,000 - Vine Street, 13th to 16th & 4th St, from Vine t - - - - - - - - 500,000 1,650,000 - Olive & Chestnut, 12th to 16th|13th, 14th, 1 - - - - - - - - - 800,000 6,300,000 Airport Road, Hwy 46 E + 6,000 Ft North - - - - - - - - - - 750,000 Total Road Maintenance Program 7,208,896 5,862,399 5,424,556 4,130,041 12,515,282 42,420,338 17,905,200 6,100,000 13,750,000 8,450,000 7,050,000 Attachment 1