Agenda packet, regular meeting — Patterson City Council, November 7, 2023 (part 2 of 2)

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Travel distance is too greatDistancia de viaje demasiado grande Hard to get to without a carDifícil de llegar sin un coche Limited availability of shadeDisponibilidad limitada de sombra Poor lighting conditionsMalas condiciones de iluminación Lack of adequate parkingFalta de estacionamiento adecuado Poor condition of planting and grassMal estado de las plantaciones y el césped Poor condition of equipment and structuresMal estado de equipos y estructuras Poor facilities maintenance (trash, unclean restrooms, graffiti, etc.)Mantenimiento deficiente de las instalaciones (basura, baños sucios, graffiti, etc.)
There isn't anything I want to do thereNo hay nada que quiera hacer allí Lack of amenities that interest meFalta de comodidades que me interesan Lack of restroomsFalta de baños
Not aware of the available parks and facilitiesNo conoce los parques e instalaciones disponibles I use other parks/facilitiesUso otros parques / instalaciones I don't have timeNo tengo tiempo
Other (please specify):o. Otros (favor de especificar):

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 168 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 6 / 34
Q4 What do you like about Patterson Parks? Rank your interest for each item listed, or write in your favorite item in 'Other.'¿Qué le gusta de los parques de Patterson? Clasifique su interés por cada artículo de la lista.

Answered: 167 Skipped: 7
PlaygroundsPati
os de recreo
Baseball
and/or softb...

Soccer
fieldsCampos...

Lawn space for
informal/pra...

Lawn space for
casual/relax...

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 169
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 7 / 34
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Not Interes… Slightly Inte… Moderately… Very Intere…
Extremely I…
Basketball
half-courtsM...

Walking
pathsSendero...

Picnic
tablesMesas ...

BBQsBarbacoas
Reservable
group picnic...

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 170 CITY OF PATTERSON

9.88%
16 10.49%
17 20.99%
34 30.86%
50 27

29.81%
48 22.36%
36 16.15%
26 15.53%
25 16

18.79%
31 28.48%
47 18.18%
30 18.18%
30 16

11.04%
18 12.27%
20 30.06%
49 27.61%
45 19

2.41%
4 13.86%
23 28.92%
48 30.72%
51 24

16.77%
27 22.36%
36 26.71%
43 14.29%
23 19

2.42%
4 8.48%
14 14.55%
24 23.03%
38 51

1.83%
3 11.59%
19 31.10%
51 28.05%
46 27

18.47%
29 14.01%
22 28.03%
44 18.47%
29 21

16.34%
25 20.92%
32 21.57%
33 18.30%
28 22
# OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):OTROS (ESPECIFICAR): DATE
1 I would like to have a park with tennis’s court and more bike trails 11/1/2021 8:18 AM 2 Flying RC Aircraft and Model Rockets 10/24/2021 1:37 PM 3 Tennis court or wall would be nice! 10/13/2021 2:40 PM 4 Basket ball half courts, tennis & creekside trails. 9/23/2021 1:36 PM 5 That they don’t have homeless or criminal element 9/16/2021 6:44 AM 6 Basketball Full-courts, River walk, hiking, camping, Safety 9/14/2021 10:31 AM 7 full court 9/7/2021 11:22 PM
8 Tennis field because I think it's fun. 9/7/2021 5:31 PM 9 Zipline 9/7/2021 5:26 PM
10 Tennis courts 9/2/2021 11:56 AM
11 The BMX track that used to be there. 8/31/2021 5:02 PM 12 Splash pad. It’s 100 degrees every summer day. 8/30/2021 8:55 PM 13 Naturally shaded areas (TREES that are healthy, large and tall which provide shade, bird habitat and
8/24/2021 7:48 PM
14 Tennis courts are not available anywhere and very necessary. There is plenty of opportunity to put in tennis and basketball courts at the Sports Complex and none are there 8/23/2021 7:02 PM
15 Water features 8/20/2021 3:43 PM
16 Need full court basketball and many other activities. 8/20/2021 3:13 PM 17 Shaded Seating areas - benches and tables 8/20/2021 10:35 AM 18 Dog park, water features 8/19/2021 10:49 PM
19 Water features - pond, lake, etc . can be used recycled water 8/19/2021 9:51 PM 20 More shade please!! 8/19/2021 7:07 PM
NOT

INTERESTEDSIN
INTERÉS

SLIGHTLY

INTERESTEDPOCO

INTERESADO

MODERATELY

INTERESTEDMODERADAMENTE

INTERESADO
VERY

INTERESTEDMUY

INTERESADO

EXTREMELY

INTERESTEDEXTREMADAME

INTERESADO
PlaygroundsPatios
de recreo
Baseball and/or
softball
diamondsDiamantes
de béisbol y / o
sóftbol
Soccer
fieldsCampos de
fútbol
Lawn space for
informal/practice
sportsEspacio de
césped para
deportes informales
/ de práctica
Lawn space for
casual/relaxation
useEspacio de
césped para uso
informal / relajación
Basketball halfcourtsMedias
canchas de
baloncesto
Walking
pathsSenderos para
caminar
Picnic tablesMesas
de picnic
BBQsBarbacoas
Reservable group
picnic areasÁreas
de picnic grupales
reservables

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 171
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 9 / 34
21 Water/splash parks, bigger play structures for 7-10 yr olds 8/19/2021 12:08 PM 22 Disk Golf, walking amd biking paths, use of ALL baseball diamonds for Little League and County softball/baseball with minimum fees
8/19/2021 11:57 AM
23 Fitness/exercise equipment 8/19/2021 11:42 AM
24 Clean and well maintained bathrooms! 8/19/2021 11:09 AM

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 172 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 10 / 34
Q5 What would you like to see added to Patterson Parks? Rank your interest for each item listed, or write in your idea in 'Other.'¿Qué le gustaría que se agregara a los parques de Patterson? Clasifique su interés por cada artículo de la lista.

Answered: 169 Skipped: 5
More picnic
areasMás áre...

Reservable
group picnic...

Multi-use
paths (walki...

Community
gardenJardín...

Dog parkParque
para perros

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 173
8 APPENDICES

Native and
drought-tole...

Quiet area to
connect with...

More
restroomsMás...

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 174 CITY OF PATTERSON

Outdoor
amphitheater...

More
playgroundsM...

Skate,
scooter, and...

Pickleball
courtCancha ...

Tennis
courtPista d...

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 175
8 APPENDICES

Exercise
stationsEsta...

Basketball
full...

Soccer
fieldCampo d...

Lacrosse
fieldCampo d...

B b ll

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 176 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 14 / 34
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Not Interes… Slightly Inte… Moderately… Very Intere…
Extremely I…
Baseball
and/or softb...

Pump track
(bike...

Spray (water)
padAlmohadil...

Volleyball
courtCancha ...

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 177
8 APPENDICES

11.04%
18 15.95%
26 32.52%
53 25.77%
42 21.79%
34 19.87%
31 22.44%
35 21.79%
34 3.64%
6 5.45%
9 12.12%
20 23.03%
38 14.81%
24 15.43%
25 22.84%
37 22.22%
36 23.75%
38 20.00%
32 18.75%
30 18.13%
29 22.01%
35 13.84%
22 23.27%
37 22.64%
36 25.93%
42 13.58%
22 23.46%
38 12.96%
21 15.85%
26 12.20%
20 30.49%
50 17.07%
28 9.20%
15 12.27%
20 25.15%
41 24.54%
40 4.79%
8 16.17%
27 26.95%
45 20.96%
35 16.77%
27 15.53%
25 26.71%
43 18.01%
29 9.76%
16 9.76%
16 21.95%
36 18.90%
31 12.88%
21 4.91%
8 27.61%
45 23.31%
38 22.36%
36 13.66%
22 18.01%
29 14.91%
24 35.00%
56 16.88%
27 24.38%
39 13.13%
21 16.15%
26 18.63%
30 23.60%
38 14.91%
24 27.50%
44 20.63%
33 21.88%
35 16.25%
26 11.11%
18 8.02%
13 25.31%
41 24.69%
40 21.60%
35 17.28%
28 19.75%
32 16.05%
26 24.07%
39 16.67%
27 21.60%
35 15.43%
25 51.55%
83 18.63%
30 14.91%
24 8.07%
13 26.09%
42 18.01%
29 20.50%
33 13.04%
21 NOT

INTERESTEDSIN
INTERÉS

SLIGHTLY

INTERESTEDPOCO

INTERESADO

MODERATELY

INTERESTEDMODERADAMENTE

INTERESADO
VERY

INTERESTEDMUY

INTERESADO

EXTREMELY

INTERESTEDEXTREMADAM

INTERESADO
More picnic areasMás
áreas de picnic
Reservable group
picnic area for
gatheringsÁrea de
picnic grupal
reservable para
reuniones
Multi-use paths
(walking, jogging,
biking)Caminos
multiusos (caminar,
trotar, andar en
bicicleta)
Community
gardenJardín
comunitario
Dog parkParque para
perros
Public artArte público
Access to
WiFiAcceso a WiFi
Native and droughttolerant
plantingPlantación
nativa y tolerante a la
sequía
Quiet area to connect
with natureZona
tranquila para
conectar con la
naturaleza
More restroomsMás
baños
Teen gathering
spaceEspacio de
reunión para
adolescentes
Outdoor
amphitheaterAnfiteatro
al aire libre
More playgroundsMás
parques infantiles
Skate, scooter, and/or
BMX parkParque de
patinaje, scooter y / o
BMX
Pickleball
courtCancha de
pickleball
Tennis courtPista de
tenis
Bocce ball
courtCancha de
bochas
Exercise
stationsEstaciones de
ejercicio
Basketball full
courtCancha completa
de baloncesto
Soccer fieldCampo de
fútbol
Lacrosse fieldCampo
de Lacrosse
Baseball and/or
softball

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 178 CITY OF PATTERSON

24.53%
39 10.69%
17 19.50%
31 15.72%
25 11.18%
18 6.83%
11 17.39%
28 13.66%
22 18.35%
29 20.25%
32 23.42%
37 16.46%
26 # OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):OTROS (FAVOR DE ESPECIFICAR): DATE 1 Need a skatepark that has more room to flow like the one at Oakdale skatepark. Also it would be nice to have a Man made lake for water activities like paddle boardI got, kayaking, canoeing
11/21/2021 5:40 PM
2 We have soccer and baseball fields so that is why I marked as moderate. 11/1/2021 8:18 AM 3 Frisbee golf & shuffleboard 9/16/2021 6:44 AM
4 We need indoor soccer facility for year round kid leagues 9/10/2021 12:29 PM 5 Indoor sports facility 9/9/2021 1:59 AM
6 Clean bathrooms 9/7/2021 5:34 PM
7 Jungle gym 9/7/2021 5:26 PM
8 Hiking trails 9/7/2021 1:12 PM
9 We would love tennis courts walking paths bike paths and shade 9/1/2021 7:49 AM 10 mountain bike trail, community gym 8/31/2021 10:19 PM 11 Indoor Sports Facility 8/31/2021 2:55 PM
12 More sports fields to host tournaments and make money. Too small even to run a soccer academy.
8/30/2021 8:55 PM
13 Basketball court at Blenheim park 8/22/2021 7:00 AM
14 Disc Golf course 8/21/2021 7:41 AM
15 Beginners Bike Trail (for children to learn to ride bikes) where there are not hazards and wider path so that parent can hold bike and run and practice turns at beginners level. Not next to street and no hills so that kids can learn to ride safely. 8/20/2021 4:14 PM
16 Trails & sitting area near water 8/19/2021 10:49 PM
17 an outdoor climbing space similar to San Ramon - communnity center and a place where kids can climb on ropes and a water pad next to tennis fieds and soccer fields with picnic table in center
8/19/2021 9:51 PM
18 More water parks. More shade 8/19/2021 3:28 PM
19 Bigger splash pad pleaaassseeee 8/19/2021 2:16 PM
20 Splash/water park 8/19/2021 12:08 PM
21 Racquetball Court 8/19/2021 11:09 AM
diamondCampo de
béisbol y / o sóftbol
Pump track (bike
park)Pista de bombas
(parque de bicicletas)
Spray (water)
padAlmohadilla de
pulverización (agua)
Volleyball
courtCancha de
vóleibol

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 179
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 17 / 34
Q6 The City has plans to construct a Recreation Center across the street from the Community Complex (Ward Ave)? Rank your interest for each item listed, or write in your favorite thing in 'Other.'La Ciudad tiene planes de construir un Centro de Recreación al otro lado de la calle del Complejo Comunitario (Ward Ave). ¿Qué comodidades le gustaría considerar en el futuro edificio? Clasifique su interés por cada artículo de la lista.

Answered: 167 Skipped: 7
Teen
centerCentro...

Workout space
with fitness...

GymnasiumGimnas
io
Dance
studioEstudi...

Classroom(s)Aul
as

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 180 CITY OF PATTERSON

Rentable
meeting...

Climbing
wallMuro de...

Game RoomSala
de juego
Multi-use
hardcourt(s)...

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 181
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 19 / 34
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Not Interes… Slightly Inte… Moderately… Very Intere…
Extremely I…
PreschoolEscuel
a Preescolar
AuditoriumAudit
orio
Prep
kitchenCocin...

Theater
spaceEspacio...

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 182 CITY OF PATTERSON

13.94%
23 18.79%
31 21.21%
35 21.21%
35 2

10.91%
18 10.30%
17 21.21%
35 18.18%
30 3

10.43%
17 13.50%
22 19.02%
31 20.25%
33 3

15.00%
24 18.75%
30 20.63%
33 18.13%
29 2

21.74%
35 21.12%
34 22.98%
37 18.63%
30 1

6.25%
10 14.37%
23 31.25%
50 23.75%
38 2

25.16%
40 15.72%
25 20.75%
33 17.61%
28 2

9.20%
15 4.91%
8 20.86%
34 30.06%
49 3

8.02%
13 11.11%
18 26.54%
43 22.22%
36 3

13.66%
22 10.56%
17 21.74%
35 19.88%
32 3

38.22%
60 15.92%
25 17.20%
27 9.55%
15 1

17.61%
28 15.09%
24 25.16%
40 23.27%
37 1

25.95%
41 16.46%
26 26.58%
42 12.03%
19 1

15.09%
24 7.55%
12 23.90%
38 22.01%
35 3
# OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):OTROS (ESPECIFICAR): DATE
1 There’s a reason they already in Patterson. 11/1/2021 8:18 AM 2 Tennis courts 10/13/2021 2:40 PM
3 A teen center that has a gymnasium, dance room, play room, theater room for screening, etc… A fitness hub for teens and adults.
9/23/2021 1:36 PM
4 Plaza style Court yard patio with outdoor theater & shade trees. 9/14/2021 10:31 AM 5 Indoor sports facility 9/9/2021 1:59 AM
6 Rentable Rooms 9/8/2021 10:20 AM
7 cooking program for youth 9/7/2021 11:22 PM
8 A small play are for ability for small people. 9/7/2021 5:31 PM 9 Music recording booth 9/7/2021 5:28 PM
10 Prep Kitchen: yess 9/7/2021 5:21 PM
11 It would be awesome if there was ,activities for children with special needs , that are not able to join in regular activities for i.e. soccer , t-ball all activities VERY SAD !! , 9/3/2021 8:52 AM
12 A Japanese Garden would be very nice to have. 9/2/2021 9:56 PM 13 Indoor swimming pool 9/1/2021 2:26 PM
14 Indoor Sports Facility 8/31/2021 2:55 PM
15 MMA wrestling room 8/30/2021 8:55 PM
16 A park that resembles a park, please. 8/24/2021 7:48 PM NOT

INTERESTEDSIN
INTERÉS

SLIGHTLY

INTERESTEDPOCO

INTERESADO

MODERATELY

INTERESTEDMODERADAMENTE

INTERESADO
VERY

INTERESTEDMUY

INTERESADO

EXTREMELY

INTERESTEDEXTREMADAM

INTERESADO
Teen centerCentro
para adolescentes
Workout space with
fitness
equipmentEspacio de
entrenamiento con
aparatos de fitness
GymnasiumGimnasio
Dance studioEstudio
de baile
Classroom(s)Aulas
Community or
activity room(s)Salas
comunitarias o de
actividades
Rentable meeting
room(s)Salas de
reuniones rentables
Climbing wallMuro de
escalada
Game RoomSala de
juego
Multi-use
hardcourt(s) (e.g.
basketball,
pickleball)Cancha (s)
de madera dura de
usos múltiples (por
ejemplo, baloncesto,
pickleball)
PreschoolEscuela
Preescolar
AuditoriumAuditorio
Prep kitchenCocina
de preparación
Theater
spaceEspacio de
teatro

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 183
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 21 / 34
17 Small cafe or coffee/smoothie bar 8/21/2021 7:41 AM
18 Outdoor Bike Area for beginners and/or pump track or outdoor trampolines for all ages. or expand pool
8/20/2021 4:14 PM
19 Boys and Girls CLub and sports with real development built in 8/20/2021 3:13 PM 20 Senior exercise room 8/19/2021 11:09 AM

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 184 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 22 / 34
Q7 The City has plans to expand the Aquatics Center at the Community Complex (Las Palmas Ave and Ward Ave)? Rank your interest for each item listed, or write in your idea in 'Other.'La Ciudad tiene planes de expandir el Centro Acuático en el Complejo Comunitario (Las Palmas Ave y Ward Ave). ¿Qué características te gustaría ver? Clasifique su interés por cada artículo de la lista.

Answered: 169 Skipped: 5
Multi-use
exercise...

Open swim
poolPiscina...

Splash
padAlmohadil...

Water
slidesToboga...

Water play
structureEst...

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 185
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 23 / 34
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Not Interes… Slightly Inte… Moderately… Very Intere…
Extremely I…
structureEst...

Whirlpool/SpaHi
dromasaje / Spa
Shaded picnic
areaÁrea de...

Party cabana
and ability ...

Group special
play feature...

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 186 CITY OF PATTERSON

9.64%
16 11.45%
19 19.28%
32 16.87%
28 6.02%
10 6.02%
10 14.46%
24 18.67%
31 9.20%
15 6.75%
11 12.88%
21 25.15%
41 9.04%
15 8.43%
14 9.64%
16 18.07%
30 7.83%
13 5.42%
9 13.25%
22 19.88%
33 15.24%
25 11.59%
19 18.90%
31 15.85%
26 5.45%
9 3.03%
5 18.18%
30 21.82%
36 12.65%
21 3.61%
6 12.65%
21 24.70%
41 6.83%
11 1.86%
3 12.42%
20 16.15%
26 # OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):OTROS (ESPECIFICAR): DATE
1 Adult lap swim times!!! 11/10/2021 3:31 PM
2 Our current public pool offers many of these things already 11/1/2021 8:18 AM 3 If water shortage is true fact this won’t be ptact 9/16/2021 6:44 AM 4 Court yard style water park with auditorium & outdoor group fitness area court & lawn 9/14/2021 10:31 AM 5 fish program for kids 9/7/2021 11:22 PM
6 Canoeing 9/7/2021 5:31 PM
7 Activities for children with special needs 9/3/2021 8:52 AM 8 Lap lanes that are available more that 30 minutes a day 9/1/2021 2:26 PM 9 A great idea is to look at Dublin The Wave park with waterslides 8/23/2021 7:02 PM 10 Indoor and/or year-around pool. I would love to do water aerobics all year. 8/22/2021 8:19 AM 11 Swim class all ages 8/19/2021 11:09 AM
NOT

INTERESTEDSIN
INTERÉS

SLIGHTLY

INTERESTEDPOCO

INTERESADO

MODERATELY

INTERESTEDMODERADAMENTE

INTERESADO
VERY

INTERESTEDMUY

INTERESADO

EXTREMELY

INTERESTEDEXTREMA

INTERESADO
Multi-use exercise
poolPiscina de ejercicios
multiusos
Open swim poolPiscina
abierta
Splash padAlmohadilla de
salpicadura
Water slidesToboganes
de agua
Water play
structureEstructura de
juego de agua
Whirlpool/SpaHidromasaje
/ Spa
Shaded picnic areaÁrea
de picnic sombreada
Party cabana and ability
to rent pool spaceCabaña
para fiestas y posibilidad
de alquilar espacio en la
piscina
Group special play feature
(lazy river, wave pool,
etc.)Funciones de juego
especiales grupales (río
lento, piscina de olas,
etc.)

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 187
8 APPENDICES

1.18% 2

10.65% 18

23.08% 39

59.76% 101

2.96% 5

2.37% 4
Q8 Please select your age group:Seleccione su grupo de edad:

Answered: 169 Skipped: 5
TOTAL 169
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Under
12Menores de...
12 to 1812 a 18
19 to 3419
hasta 34
35 to 6435
hasta 64
Over 65Mayores
de 65
Prefer not to
sayPrefiero ...

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Under 12Menores de 12 años
12 to 1812 a 18
19 to 3419 hasta 34
35 to 6435 hasta 64
Over 65Mayores de 65
Prefer not to sayPrefiero no decirlo

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 188 CITY OF PATTERSON

44.58% 74

6.63% 11

1.20% 2

4.22% 7

2.41% 4

17.47% 29

23.49% 39
Q9 Select the race you identify with:Selecciona la raza con la que te identificas:

Answered: 166 Skipped: 8
TOTAL 166
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
WhiteBlanco
African
AmericanAfro...

Native
AmericanNati...

AsianAsiático
Pacific
IslanderIsle...

Two or more
racesDos o m...

Prefer not to
sayPrefiero ...

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
WhiteBlanco
African AmericanAfroamericano
Native AmericanNativo Americano
AsianAsiático
Pacific IslanderIsleño del Pacífico
Two or more racesDos o más razas étnicas
Prefer not to sayPrefiero no decirlo

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 189
8 APPENDICES

40.83% 69

42.60% 72

16.57% 28
Q10 Select the ethnicity you identify with:

Answered: 169 Skipped: 5
TOTAL 169
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
HispanicHispano
Non-HispanicNo
Hispano
Prefer not to
sayPrefiero ...

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
HispanicHispano
Non-HispanicNo Hispano
Prefer not to sayPrefiero no decirlo

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 190 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 28 / 34
Q11 Anything else to tell us about Patterson Parks?¿Algo más que contarnos sobre los parques de Patterson?
Answered: 91 Skipped: 83
# RESPONSES DATE
1 More things for adults needed 12/2/2021 8:31 PM
2 Please bring a skatepark that has more space to ride around like the one in Oakdale, Ca at the Oakdale skatepark. Please also have more walking/running trails and bike paths that are shaded with trees. Would be nice to be able to walk/run around a water feature with trees lining the path. Possibly create a man made lake for water sports such as kayak, canoeing, paddle boarding.
11/21/2021 5:40 PM
3 More walking paths with distances marked/noted, accessible to wheelchairs & strollers 11/10/2021 3:31 PM 4 Looking forward for to see new things in Patterson. 11/1/2021 8:18 AM 5 Upkeep of parks is great! Just wish there were more basketball or tennis courts. 10/13/2021 2:40 PM 6 I'm excited to see what happens to Patterson Parks in the coming years 10/6/2021 9:07 AM 7 Also under age 12 9/30/2021 4:58 PM
8 Also under age 12. Me gustaria seguridad. 9/30/2021 4:56 PM 9 Also Under age 12 9/30/2021 4:47 PM
10 Bowling 9/30/2021 4:38 PM
11 The poor park and street scape miss management should be a topic of discussion during the planing of new facilities. Any new facilities built with public funds (our tax money) should be maintained as it if the improvements were our private property. 9/23/2021 1:36 PM
12 We have most of these things already available. It’s up to people to utilize them and they don’t.
9/22/2021 3:36 PM
13 Plan safety & cleaning & lighting 9/16/2021 6:44 AM
14 They need more shade!!! That is the number one reason I don’t like the parks here, the play structures are not shaded
9/15/2021 11:35 AM
15 Placing safety as a top priority, having an aging community in mind, City of Patterson should create a safe and interactive community environment where all interests are met to enjoy an entertaining and peaceful community. Envision a pedestrian friendly city with courtyards for all ages with auditoriums for performing arts, reunions to celebrate festivities and regular days of outdoor play and exercising. Music plays and people move. They walk, run, bike, or skate.

Safety is the mind to maintain enjoyable moments. Enjoy. 9/14/2021 10:31 AM
16 Indoor Soccer facility needed 9/10/2021 12:29 PM
17 I’d would be awesome if you can add to the survey to build an indoor (sports) soccer facility.

Bet you would get 100% positive feed back. There is a small indoor sports facility on the west side of town, Its a great asset for the community. Maybe work together.?! 9/9/2021 1:59 AM
18 Homeless people discourage park use by the average person. 9/8/2021 2:24 PM 19 need 9/7/2021 11:22 PM
20 The City of Patterson should implement more cultural diverse activities for example there are more than Hispanic and White that live here where are all of the African American events? I also see very little of representation of African American youth working in the local businesses in-fact I only know of one store owner that is African American or Black why is that? You have one AA council member but know black owned businesses. There is nothing here to culturally represent this diverse community , Why?
9/7/2021 6:34 PM
21 No, just a lot of shade and cleaning are needed. 9/7/2021 5:34 PM 22 They need to have larger playground and repairs. 9/7/2021 5:31 PM 23 Some of the parks are really dirty and not kept up with, only the grass is cut. 9/7/2021 5:26 PM 24 I would like if in Parks their would be snackbars. 9/7/2021 5:21 PM 25 Partner with local organizations for improved community services. 9/7/2021 1:12 PM 26 Addition of drinking fountains and lots of trash cans. 9/7/2021 1:10 PM 27 I would love to see a wood park structure similar to Donnelly Park in Turlock, and I am looking forward to bike trails around our town.
9/4/2021 4:33 PM
28 Please install tennis courts 9/2/2021 11:56 AM
29 I wish the current swimming pool would offer more lap swim times, especially on the weekends (in the morning is just great) Also, group fitness classes would be amazing, not just for seniors. Yoga, zumba, body pump, spin, bootcamps, etc.
9/1/2021 2:26 PM
30 My kids enjoy fun play structures with shade , grass and walking and biking paths also would love a open tennis court.
9/1/2021 7:49 AM

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 191
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 29 / 34
31 They are very dirty 8/31/2021 4:01 PM
32 It’s very nice to take my dog on walks. 8/31/2021 3:54 PM 33 Its a great place to hang out with friends. 8/31/2021 3:53 PM 34 Nope 8/31/2021 3:49 PM
35 No 8/31/2021 12:41 PM
36 Need more activities/space for teenagers. Bathrooms in parks!!!!! 8/31/2021 8:01 AM 37 Would like a big walking path around a pretty man made lake Like Lake Elizabeth in Fremont I miss walking around it Tired of walking around neighborhood 8/31/2021 12:58 AM
38 No 8/30/2021 10:59 PM
39 We need more play structures at gold bar park . Some slides , teeter totter, monkey bars. Pull up bars , balancing things for the kids and other structures. The big climbing wall there is missing a lot of foot pegs. The swings that are there are great and the kids love them. Just wish there was a little more for kids to do their.
8/30/2021 8:31 PM
40 Quit charging leagues money to use fields when all the kids who use those fields are Patterson kids! You already have our tax money!!
8/30/2021 8:23 PM
41 I'm associated with Patterson Little League and we would love to see a portion of the large amount of money we pay for field usage to be invested in the field we pay to use. 8/30/2021 7:16 PM
42 BMX/Bike park would be amazing to see. Waterslides too! 8/30/2021 7:16 PM 43 Make it more accessible to the community. 8/30/2021 7:02 PM 44 Yes 8/30/2021 6:50 PM
45 An app or system to report park issues would be really helpful in maintaining parks 8/30/2021 5:26 PM 46 No 8/30/2021 5:15 PM
47 Most are good, but also lack shade and restrooms. The heat of summer keeps us from playing because everything is hot. The invasion of homeless people and several mentally diminished adults hanging around has also become a problem.
8/30/2021 4:39 PM
48 N/A 8/30/2021 4:33 PM
49 While I like several of the proposed ideas for the existing park expansions, I must wonder about Patterson Park & Recreation's (P&R) ability to properly manage and maintain said expansions. P&R's maintenance efforts of our existing parks is leaving much to be desired.

Many of our parks are using residential grade trash cans which blow over frequently. The subsequent trash then litters the playgrounds, often for extended periods of time. The landscaping along the bike path running parallel with American Eagle Ave and Floragold Park is typically maintained by volunteer homeowners that have become fed up with P&R's inability to trim and maintain the landscaping along the bike path. The tan bark in the playgrounds could use more frequent refilling/replacement of bark. These are all things that I would like to think P&R has the capacity to handle - especially in light of how much we are paying in Mello Roos.

Before we expand, we should make sure we can handle the infrastructure we already have - which we quite clearly cannot.
8/25/2021 5:52 PM
50 More activities for early elementary students. 8/24/2021 9:46 PM 51 It just seems as if all of our parks looks the same… a sunken area covered with grass with a few small trees and bushes. Can we please change this!
8/24/2021 7:48 PM
52 I do not feel safe at some of our parks; I go outdoors daily and can count on one hand the number of times I've seen them patrolled.
8/24/2021 5:20 PM
53 N/a 8/24/2021 2:32 PM
54 Please consider adding tennis courts and basketball courts to the Sports Park so the area can live up to its name.
8/23/2021 7:02 PM
55 I am very active in umpiring for a tournament club and if we had a venue here with about 4 or more softball fields, I'm sure we could bring some good tournaments to Patterson and create some revenue for the city. This also opens the opportunities for local youth and adult softball leagues.
8/23/2021 10:35 AM
56 No 8/22/2021 3:18 PM
57 The lack of bathrooms and shade make using the parks difficult for any extended period of time. Also there are so many small parks that no one knows the names of - maybe a better map and naming system? If I were to say to someone "meet me at Newcastle park" they would have no idea where that is. Also more defining features to each park - right now so many of them are exactly the same, uninteresting or uncreative. 8/22/2021 8:19 AM
58 We need more appropriate activities at parks for teens and pre teens 8/22/2021 7:00 AM 59 Need to add or update/invest in parks in established areas of town. I live in the Golden Estates neighborhood and we have a drainage basin nearby, but no amenities for children such as play equipment. It would be great to be able to walk to a park instead of always driving to one. 8/21/2021 10:36 AM
60 We have some great parks, but so many of them are unusable during our long hot season and lack of shade and accessible water fountains or bottle refilling stations (this was an issue long before Covid) Addressing the heat safety issues of shade and hydration is a great first step.

Turn on the drinking fountains! We also have a great skate park that is unusable during hot summer days and the lights never get turned on for the young folks to have the opportunity to ride at night when it has cooled off. Turn on the skatepark lights! 8/21/2021 7:41 AM

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 192 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 30 / 34
61 Any addition would be great because we are so limited here. 8/20/2021 5:31 PM 62 no 8/20/2021 5:16 PM
63 Keep them free of homeless 8/20/2021 5:03 PM
64 . 8/20/2021 4:24 PM
65 A bike park is preferable for children 2-18 as there are levels of all ages learning to ride and the city of Patterson does not have anywhere that we can safely do that. If you can combine the park with a pump track for more advanced riders it would keep the kids off of the streets with the cars and provide some entertainment. Additionally, adding more space to the pool so that we can expand kids swimming and lessen the burden of water shortage would be great! if all we can afford is a tarp over the play structures at least the swings so they don't get so hot in the summertime it would be great!
8/20/2021 4:14 PM
66 Looking forward to seeing overdue and kong-awaited improvements and additions to recreational facilities.
8/20/2021 3:50 PM
67 Need larger shaded areas 8/20/2021 3:43 PM
68 Water slides kid activities are needed and teen areas activities are greatly needed. There are plenty of areas for outdoor sports already and dog and exercise areas we lack activities for our kids. Gaming Movies Chuckee cheese John incredible pizza games bowling alley water slide park to beat the heat another pool.
8/20/2021 3:34 PM
69 More things for the teens to do in the area Really limited to small children which leads to the teens having no options
8/20/2021 3:19 PM
70 Please visit cities like Clovis, Chino HIlls, for ideas to bring beautiful parks and activities to Patterson. The current model of tiny parks are only good for loitering and bad behavior. There is no safe park in patterson and lack any real scenery as well. 8/20/2021 3:13 PM
71 Tennis courts & more shade please! 8/20/2021 10:42 AM 72 The original parks are great! More shade would be better, it’s hot here lol most times it’s just too hot to go & hang out in the sun. Shade shade shade :) 8/20/2021 10:35 AM
73 no 8/20/2021 5:48 AM
74 Splash park would be awesome!! And a dog park 8/19/2021 11:18 PM 75 Would be nice to have interactive things along trails or in playground areas. 8/19/2021 10:49 PM 76 We need more activities for kids under 18. We need a huge splash pad park. We need indoor activities for when it's too hot outside. I like the idea of a climbing wall, maybe indoor batting cages, volleyball courts, etc.
8/19/2021 10:43 PM
77 Overall , I wish those planning the parks take into account the community needs. There are many good examples of parks which provide good facilities for all such as San Ramon. We go to soccer tournaments and it is always a pleasure to there. As a board memebr of Patterson Futblo Club I am intested in soccer fields but understnad the community needs more than just soccer fields to attract business into this community
8/19/2021 9:51 PM
78 Better use of parks already available 8/19/2021 9:21 PM 79 Provide full court basketball courts will have a huge impact on the community. 8/19/2021 8:12 PM 80 Thank you 8/19/2021 7:07 PM
81 No 8/19/2021 4:32 PM
82 We need more shaded areas, picnic tables, more things for toddlers and young kids to do.

Water park, splash pads, a jamba juice. A safe biking route for families. 8/19/2021 3:28 PM
83 no 8/19/2021 3:14 PM
84 BATHROOMS 8/19/2021 2:54 PM
85 Need to be patrolled to keep everyone safe 8/19/2021 12:31 PM 86 N/A 8/19/2021 12:03 PM
87 More for the Kids and Teens in this community! Work with the school to utilize what type of buildings are already here in Patterson ex. Rentable classrooms, auditorium, theater, tennis courts, basketball courts, it works for the school to use the pool for swimming, diving, waterpolo. Build the relationship to utilize what we already have. BMX never should have been taken out, just fixed up and fenced to keep protected, like the skatepark. My kids loved that track before it was taken out unnecessarily. Thanks for all the hard work and reaching out to the community for their input.
8/19/2021 11:57 AM
88 More water parks/splash pads! It’s get Extremely hot and 1 is just not enough. 8/19/2021 11:32 AM 89 Keep the drug and pot users out of the parks. 8/19/2021 11:09 AM 90 No. 8/19/2021 10:29 AM
91 No 8/19/2021 10:27 AM

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 193
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 31 / 34
Q12 Are you interested in being more involved with creating the Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan? If so, provide your contact information (name, phone, and email).¿Está interesado en participar más en la creación del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson? Si es así, proporcione su Iiformación de contacto (nombre, teléfono, y correo electrónico).

Answered: 80 Skipped: 94
# RESPONSES DATE
1 Carlos Rios 12/2/2021 8:31 PM
2 No 11/21/2021 5:40 PM
3 Yes! Emily Pack, 209-573-3485, [email protected] 11/10/2021 3:31 PM 4 Yes 11/1/2021 8:18 AM
5 Absolutely! Faria Tahir, 503-828-4034, [email protected]. I have a Bachelor degree in Accounting, have volunteer experience, and am fairly active when it comes to exercising. I'm originally from Cupertino, CA and recently moved to Patterson. I'd more than happy to help out. 10/13/2021 2:40 PM
6 Brianna Belluomini 209 534 2470 [email protected] 10/6/2021 9:07 AM 7 Timothy Benefield [email protected] (209) 566-3162 9/30/2021 5:19 PM 8 Sergio Perez (209) 450-3160 [email protected] 9/23/2021 1:36 PM 9 Yes 9/16/2021 6:44 AM
10 Lacey Timmins [email protected] 408-569-0004 9/15/2021 11:35 AM 11 Tahmirah Hamed, (925) 628-0550, [email protected] 9/15/2021 8:35 AM 12 Jose Mercado 209-202-7175 [email protected] 9/14/2021 10:31 AM 13 [email protected] 9/10/2021 12:29 PM
14 I was on the park and rec commission for 10 years we created a parks and rec master plan back in I think 2012 Karen Willard 209-404-6086 [email protected] 9/9/2021 11:27 AM
15 Yes 9/9/2021 1:59 AM
16 No 9/8/2021 2:05 PM
17 Yes, Name - Isabella Clauzel Email - [email protected] Phone - 209-480-2232 9/8/2021 10:20 AM 18 Fred 5108167832 [email protected] 9/7/2021 11:22 PM 19 Shawun Ruth Anderson, 925-209-6991 [email protected] 9/7/2021 6:34 PM 20 By showing up daily 9/7/2021 5:38 PM
21 Nyle Dobard. 510-512-5094. [email protected] 9/7/2021 5:36 PM 22 Yes. Fatima Sanchez Infante. 408-824-3820. [email protected] 9/7/2021 5:34 PM 23 I'm slightly interested. 9/7/2021 5:31 PM
24 I can do manual labor on weekends and during summer. 9/7/2021 5:28 PM 25 Adriana Corona-Duran (209)892-4770 [email protected] 9/7/2021 1:10 PM 26 Citlaly Villalobos (650)544-0600 [email protected] 9/2/2021 9:56 PM 27 No 9/2/2021 11:56 AM
28 Yes! Terri Smith 8017101365 [email protected] 9/1/2021 2:26 PM 29 Joshua Smith, [email protected] 8/31/2021 10:19 PM 30 [email protected] 8/31/2021 5:02 PM
31 Yes 8/31/2021 4:01 PM
32 Nicole Martinez 2092782994 [email protected] 8/31/2021 3:54 PM 33 Yes i am. Talan Nguyen [email protected] 5108769999 8/31/2021 3:53 PM 34 Yes (408)-824-3820 8/31/2021 3:49 PM
35 No 8/31/2021 12:41 PM
36 Vanessa Villegas, 408-409-9545, [email protected] 8/31/2021 11:56 AM 37 Jasmyn ortiz 2096957474 [email protected] 8/30/2021 10:59 PM 38 Amy Castorena 408-621-2615 [email protected] 8/30/2021 8:55 PM 39 No 8/30/2021 8:23 PM

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 194 CITY OF PATTERSON

Dwight Jones 818-792-9868 [email protected]
8/19/2021 8:12 PM
68 Staci Keithahn 5597869362 [email protected] 8/19/2021 7:19 PM 69 Maria Ventura 5109212696 8/19/2021 7:07 PM
70 No 8/19/2021 4:32 PM
71 [email protected] 8/19/2021 3:28 PM
72 Jamie [email protected] 8/19/2021 3:14 PM
73 Kandace 5109530716 8/19/2021 2:54 PM
74 [email protected] 8/19/2021 2:16 PM
75 Unable to do so due to health issues 8/19/2021 12:31 PM 76 N/A 8/19/2021 12:03 PM
77 [email protected] 8/19/2021 11:32 AM
78 I’m very interested but do not have the time to help effectively. 8/19/2021 11:09 AM 79 Yes. Adrian Laurel, 209 596 0468 [email protected] 8/19/2021 10:29 AM 80 No 8/19/2021 10:27 AM

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 195
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Online Survey (August - October 2021)
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 33 / 34
Q13 Thank you for your time! Please provide your email if you’d like updates on the Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan or visit www.PlayPatterson.com.¡Gracias por su tiempo! Proporcione su correo electrónico si desea recibir actualizaciones sobre el Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson o visite www.PlayPatterson.com.

Answered: 76 Skipped: 98
# RESPONSES DATE
1 [email protected] 12/2/2021 8:31 PM
2 [email protected] 11/10/2021 3:31 PM
3 [email protected] 11/1/2021 8:18 AM
4 [email protected] 10/31/2021 3:20 AM
5 [email protected] 10/13/2021 2:40 PM
6 [email protected] 10/6/2021 9:07 AM
7 [email protected] 9/30/2021 5:15 PM
8 [email protected] 9/30/2021 4:56 PM
9 [email protected] 9/30/2021 4:51 PM
10 [email protected] 9/15/2021 11:35 AM
11 [email protected] 9/14/2021 10:31 AM
12 [email protected] 9/10/2021 12:29 PM
13 [email protected] 9/9/2021 11:27 AM
14 I’m already registered 9/9/2021 1:59 AM
15 [email protected] 9/8/2021 10:20 AM
16 Afriza33 @comcast.net 9/7/2021 6:34 PM
17 [email protected] 9/7/2021 5:38 PM
18 [email protected] 9/7/2021 5:36 PM
19 [email protected] 9/7/2021 5:31 PM
20 [email protected] 9/7/2021 5:17 PM
21 [email protected] 9/4/2021 3:28 PM
22 [email protected] 9/2/2021 9:56 PM
23 [email protected] 9/2/2021 11:56 AM
24 [email protected] 8/31/2021 10:19 PM
25 [email protected] 8/31/2021 5:02 PM
26 [email protected] 8/31/2021 4:01 PM
27 [email protected] 8/31/2021 3:54 PM
28 [email protected] 8/31/2021 3:53 PM
29 [email protected] 8/31/2021 3:49 PM
30 [email protected] 8/31/2021 12:41 PM
31 [email protected] 8/31/2021 11:56 AM
32 [email protected] 8/30/2021 10:59 PM
33 [email protected] 8/30/2021 8:31 PM
34 [email protected] 8/30/2021 8:23 PM
35 [email protected] 8/30/2021 7:59 PM
36 [email protected] 8/30/2021 7:16 PM
37 [email protected] 8/30/2021 7:16 PM
38 [email protected] 8/30/2021 7:01 PM
39 Please execute 8/30/2021 6:50 PM
40 [email protected] 8/30/2021 4:33 PM
41 No. 8/24/2021 9:46 PM

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 196 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Encuesta de la comunidad para la actualización del Plan Maestro de Parques y Recreación de Patterson 34 / 34
42 [email protected] 8/23/2021 10:35 AM
43 [email protected] 8/23/2021 9:05 AM
44 [email protected] 8/22/2021 3:18 PM
45 [email protected] 8/22/2021 8:19 AM
46 [email protected] 8/22/2021 7:00 AM
47 [email protected] 8/21/2021 10:36 AM
48 [email protected] 8/21/2021 7:41 AM
49 n 8/20/2021 5:16 PM
50 [email protected] 8/20/2021 5:09 PM
51 1 8/20/2021 4:24 PM
52 [email protected] 8/20/2021 4:14 PM
53 [email protected] 8/20/2021 3:50 PM
54 [email protected] 8/20/2021 3:43 PM
55 [email protected] 8/20/2021 3:34 PM
56 [email protected] 8/20/2021 12:57 PM
57 [email protected] 8/20/2021 10:42 AM
58 [email protected] 8/20/2021 10:35 AM
59 [email protected] 8/20/2021 5:48 AM
60 [email protected] 8/19/2021 11:18 PM
61 [email protected] 8/19/2021 11:02 PM
62 [email protected] 8/19/2021 10:43 PM
63 [email protected] 8/19/2021 9:51 PM
64 [email protected] 8/19/2021 8:12 PM
65 [email protected] 8/19/2021 7:19 PM
66 [email protected] 8/19/2021 7:07 PM
67 [email protected] 8/19/2021 4:32 PM
68 [email protected] 8/19/2021 3:28 PM
69 [email protected] 8/19/2021 2:16 PM
70 [email protected] 8/19/2021 12:03 PM
71 [email protected] 8/19/2021 11:57 AM
72 [email protected] 8/19/2021 11:42 AM
73 [email protected] 8/19/2021 11:32 AM
74 [email protected] 8/19/2021 11:09 AM
75 [email protected] 8/19/2021 10:29 AM
76 N 8/19/2021 10:27 AM

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 197
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Patterson Riverbank
2010 Population 20,413 (2010 Census) 22,678 (2010 Census) Build-out Population 66,000 52,500
2010 Population Age 50+ 2,459 5,188
2010 Population Age 5-19 5,832 5,805
Aquatics
Number of Facilities 1 1
Name of Facility Patterson Aquatic Center Riverbank Community Pool Owner of Facility City of Patterson City of Riverbank
Year Opened 2006
Lap Pool 6-lanes 6-lane lap pool w/shallow L
Lap Pool Size 25-yard 25-yard
Play Feature Water Play Feature in Zero to 3' Pool
Locker Rooms Yes
Family Changing Room(s)
Concessions Yes
Other Features 2 - 1 Meter Diving Boards
Community/Recreation
Centers
Number of Facilities 1 3
Name of Facility A Riverbank Community Center
Owner of Facility A City of Riverbank
Type of Facility A Community Hall w/Kitchen
Capacity of Facility A 300
Name of Facility B Scout Hall
Owner of Facility B City of Riverbank
Type of Facility B Meeting Space w/Kitchen
Capacity of Facility B 50
Name of Facility C Walnut Grove Community Gym Riverbank Community Gym Owner of Facility C Co-owned with School District Co-owned with School District Type of Facility C City Manages Rentals Gymnasium at Middle School

APPENDIX B - BENCHMARKING STUDY DATA COLLECTION

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 198 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
Patterson Riverbank
Senior Centers
Number of Facilities 1
Name of Facility Hammon Senior Center
Owner of Facility City of Patterson
Year Opened Nov. 2009
Total Square Feet 8,465 s.f.

Arts and Crafts Room 728 s.f. - capacity 48/104 Assembly Community Room (Banquet
Hall)
1,585 s.f.-capacity 106/226 Assembly
Fitness Room 1,042
Lounge / Game Room Yes
Residential Kitchen 313
Youth and/or Teen Centers
Number of Facilities 1
Name of Facility Riverbank Teen Center
Owner of Facility City of Riverbank
Year Opened Opened in 2011
Total Square Feet Capacity 100
Classroom Yes
Computer Room Yes
Fitness Room Yes
Game Room Yes
Residential Kitchen Kitchenette
Lounge Yes

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 199
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
1 The following project samples represent material that will make up my unbound master’s project. Much of the data presented using a GIS has been collected through online resources, personal observation and surveys, as well as from aerial imagery. Each project has been dated based on its completion although much of the material will be edited again before its inclusion.

Access to Recreational Open Space in Patterson, CA:

A Geospatial Analysis Utilizing Geographic Information Systems Compiled by: Leanne Lynch

Abstract:

Many cities throughout California have experienced land use shifts from prime agricultural land to developed industrial and residential areas without adequate planning for recreational open space accessibility. Since 2002 the City of Patterson has rezoned over 800 acres of agricultural land for urban and industrial use while developers set aside recreational open space at inconvenient locations in new subdivisions. I will use Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to conduct an analysis of the accessibility of recreational open space to residents within Patterson's city limits. This project will include a comparative analysis between accessibility maps and survey results collected during Public Participatory GIS (PPGIS) sessions. Participants in the PPGIS study may include citizens living in Patterson, community members employed in Patterson, City and County officials, and farmers whose lands either share a border to the City of Patterson and/or exist within city limits.

GIS layers and data created for the analysis will be shared with the City of Patterson and possibly published in the local media. The study will be made available to the public and act as a resource for the development of Patterson’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Results of this project will help the City planning department make well-informed decisions on improving access to parks, creating secure paths for children, promoting healthy and affordable alternatives to motor vehicle transportation, and better connecting residents with poor access to recreational open space.

Stanislaus County
Patterson
APPENDIX C - REPORT: ACCESS TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE IN

PATTERSON

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 200 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
2 ACCESS BASED ON DISTANCE (Fall 2011):

The first assessment of access to parkland was
based on a distance of .25 miles using 2010
population census data. Neighborhoods within
.25 miles of a park and having either a bicycle
lane or sidewalks on either side of the street
were found to have the highest access to parks.

Some locations within the .25 mile radius, had
barriers interrupting the most direct route to
parks such as missing sidewalks, a lack of bicycle
lanes, or canals and fences. Neighborhoods
within .25 miles that had barriers to parks were
moved into the category of having low access.

The population with low access to parks was
estimated at 6,800; approximately 10% of the
total population having low access was under 18
years old. About 60% of the population over 65 years old had high access to parks.

Focusing the analysis on the population of children under 18 years old highlights the need for diverse, safe, and direct pathways to parks. Children are a part of the population with less independent access to vehicles and require more access to non-motorized transportation methods like walking, bicycling, riding a scooter, and skateboarding. In neighborhoods established before 1990 there are several streets where sidewalks are broken from tree growth, disconnected, or have no sidewalks at all. Alley ways behind these houses are not paved and therefore, families with strollers or persons in motorized chairs must travel in the road, typically around cars that are parked on the street.

A cyclist traveling East on Sperry Ave. must ride in the road before a bike lane begins. Cars line the curb across the street where sidewalks are missing. Sections of neighborhoods in this area lack both sidewalks and designated bicycle lanes near HWY 33

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 201
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
3 The railroad crossing before the intersection at N.

First St. and Walnut Ave had some recent pedestrian
safety renovations. A bicycle lane travels East while a sidewalk lines the opposite side of the street.

A faded bicycle lane directs cyclists down Walnut Ave toward Walnut Grove Elementary School in the background. The faded lines are similar to other bicycle lanes across town while neither the long driveway, nor the unloading areas are wide enough to accommodate both cyclists and vehicles at the school.

ACCESS BASED ON CRIME (Spring 2012):

To further uncover barriers to parkland, I organized and examined different categories of crime and their locations in order to uncover the parks affected by the highest number of incidents of illegal activity and traffic violations.

My previous study which identified the areas in Patterson that are the farthest away from parks did not include the population of Patterson residents who live a block away from a park, but still may be affected by unseen barriers such as illegal activity and safety concerns causing low access.

Unfortunately the geographic location for reported crimes was not readily available through the Patterson Police Department, but a sample of calls are published in the local newspaper every week, so I was able to retrieve a sample of calls from January 1, 2011 to March 13, 2012.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 202 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
4 Due to the number of different types of incidents each were organized into one of five major categories.

Category Incident type
Assault Gun shots, battery, assault, warrant, child endangerment, resisting arrest Burglary/Theft Burglary, car theft, vandalism, bullets hitting property, breaking and entering Traffic Drunk in public, disturbing the peace, forging vehicle registration Illegal Substance Possession of paraphernalia, alleged use Unlawful Activities Contributing to delinquency of a minor, false emergency reporting

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 203
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
5 8.2.a
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 204 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
6 Using a predictive model to estimate the likelihood of incidents near parks, I was able to locate parks which may experience high crime/traffic incidents which may be considered a barrier.

By including crime and traffic incidents in the assessment of people’s access to parkland, my original study showing locations of low access can now include places that are much closer to parks than previously estimated. During the analysis a few variables may have influenced the results in ways that should be examined more closely. For example, Meadow Rue Park, the Skate Park, and the grassy area at Las Palmas and Sperry Ave. across from Meadow Rue Park are near several businesses where theft and other crimes have occurred. Although three of the seven parks with high predicted incidents are situated near a shopping center, the crime occurring within a grocery store may not necessarily have an effect on whether a person goes to one of the nearby parks. Another factor affecting the results of this study is that some of the crimes that occurred and were reported in the police log did not include valuable spatial information and only had descriptions such as “northeast Patterson” or “Patterson.” Given the lack of specific data in these instances, the entire incident was discarded to avoid potentially skewing the study’s results. Having more specific information in these cases would have been useful as several of them were assault or battery of which may be considered the most dangerous of crimes that can occur. Further investigation regarding the influences of crime and incidents near parks is necessary to assess the possible correlation between barriers to parks and people’s perceptions of those incidents.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATORY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (PPGIS) SURVEY (Summer 2012):

After an analysis of low and high access due to distance, crime, and traffic incidents in the City of Patterson, the next assessment conducted was a survey to determine whether community members would report similar barriers. The following surveys and maps were created to ground-truth the data acquired from previous

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 205
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
7 analysis through the first hand experiences of people living and working in the City of Patterson. Surveys were conducted at an Earth Day event, the Apricot Fiesta, through after school programs, as well as at a local business in Patterson. All participants completed a consent form, but surveys were kept separate from any recorded personal information to maintain anonymity.

The map on the left was printed
as a large poster for participants
to draw on during PPGIS events.

A question on the survey asks
participants to label the location
of barriers that keep them from
accessing parkland and most
participants preferred to write
the barrier on the survey because
it wasn’t necessarily a barrier
they felt could be drawn. The
survey was designed for adults
18 years and older and children
17 and under. Each survey was
made available in both English
and Spanish.

Response examples to the main
questions are listed below. This
information is currently being
combined with the spatial
orientation of each respondent compared to the distance to the most frequently used parks.

Access to Recreational Open Space Survey: Children Responses ages 10 & 11; 13 surveys (The number after each response represents the total number of respondents having the same answer) How old are you? Boy____ Girl____
1). Circle the neighborhood where you live on the map. Circle size:
2). Color in all of the parks that you visit
3). Number the parks you visit on the map from 1-5 using number 1 for the park you visit the most, number 2 for the park you visit the second most, and so on.
4). List all of the ways you travel to the park.

Walk: 5
Bicycle: 4
Car: 7
Skate: 1
Scooter: 2
5). What do you like to do at the park? What are you favorite features of the parks you go to? Monkey bars
Play on the playground equipment: 3
Walk the dogs and play with them: 2
Football: 2

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 206 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
8 Soccer: 2
Baseball
Batting Cage
Play catch
Run around
Ride bike
Play sports with my team
Play with family/friends
6). What barriers/challenges make it difficult for you to travel to the park? Parents going to work: 2
Going other places (busy): 2
Parents need to take me
None: 2
Fights at Garza Park
Parents worried something might happen to me
Police, parents
7). What keeps you from going to the park more often?
Night time
Too far to walk to
After school program
Need to study for tests at school
Gangs: 3
Need a ride
Violent issues and scary people
Police
Playing video games
Busy with sports
8). If you were in charge of planning and designing your favorite park, what would you do? Make it a water park
Make a park with a cover over it to stop the weather and instead of bark I will put foam I would divide it into a big sports complex for all sports and make sure every sport has their own field. Open 24 hours
Sports Fields
Big playgrounds and swings
Supervise the parks more often (cameras): 4
Put a dodge ball court, golf course, swimming pool, vending machine for food and water, and sprinklers so we can run in them
I would make long monkey bars, swirly slides, and stairs Draw a picture of what you think of when you hear the word barrier. The descriptions below describe what was drawn:

Rain over playground equipment: 2
Sprinklers
A hole
A house with a child in the window looking outside

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 207
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
9 A child in her room at a desk (probably doing homework) A fence
Access To Recreational Open Space: Adult Responses ages 18 and older; 30 surveys Please circle your age group and gender: Between 18-30 30-65 Over 65 Male Female 1). Circle the neighborhood where you live on the map. Circle size:
2). Number the parks you visit from 1-5 using number 1 for the park you visit the most, number 2 for the park you visit the second most, and so on and draw in the route you take to get there. 3). List all of the ways you travel to the park.

Drive: 22
Walk: 20
Run: 4
Bicycle: 9
Bicycle around neighborhoods passing the parks: 1
Roller Blade: 1
Skate: 2
4). What do you like to do at the park? What are you favorite features of the parks you go to? Soccer: 3
Volleyball
Swings: 2
Toddler swings
Slide: 2
Picnic: 4
Take animals (Walk dog, room for dogs to run at the dog park): 7 Walk around park: 3
Relax: 5
Talk with friends: 3
Play with children/grandchildren: 5
Let children play
Climbing structures
Hold teen activities: 2
Trees and green grass: 3
Kid play area is nice to have close to home: 3
Horseshoes: 2
Baseball: 2
Shade: 2
Clean parks: 2
Less trouble with gangs
Roller Blade
Bike Ride
Water fountain
Bathrooms: 2
Workout
BBQ
Family Gatherings/Birthday parties: 2

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 208 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
10 Sports
Play catch
5). What barriers/challenges make it difficult for you to travel to the park? (What keeps you from going to certain parks)?
Privacy at some parks, like bushes and big buildings, because you can't see who may be there like homeless or gang activity
Loose dogs: 3
Gangs: 3
Drugs/selling drugs: 2
Bathrooms: 2
Wheelchair access
Lack of Shade: 2
No shade on play structures for kids (hot slides)
Not enough safe toddler equipment
Heat
Lack of drinking water at the parks
Lack of bike trails
Distance: 6
Too crowded
Old age (“older-further you don't want to go”)
Physical health
None
Pot holes
Many are unknown
Bad roads
No sidewalk along one of my routes
Not enough parking
Rude people
Access
6) What keeps you from going to the park more often?
Lack of shade structures over play equipment, need shady areas (hot play structures): 3 Lack of good play equipment
Dogs: 2 (The dogs became loose one day and were fighting) Gangs
Drugs
People smoke and do drugs at the skate park
Distractions at home
People drinking alcoholic beverages
Time: 8
Money
New bike
Too far: 2
Lack of incentive
Work
None

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 209
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
11 I don't let children go to Garza: too much graffiti and gang violence Not enough dog parks
Bathroom access
Weather: 2
Graffiti, litter, thugs hanging out and making it a hostile environment I don’t want to
7). On the large map: label the locations of the barriers that keep you from accessing parkland and other areas around town.
8). If you were in charge of planning and designing better ways to access your favorite parks, what would you do?
More equipment
“Providing sidewalks through out-of-the-way for easy access” Consistent openings-gates locked usually or left open all night (Sunflower Park) More lights
No fences for children or toys, less gates (more gates and security usually means worse area and further threats): 2
Have open bathrooms: 2
More bike lanes
Smoother roads to access for skateboards
Add shade structures to cover play equipment and for people wanting to sit and rest: 4 Dog poop bags
Garbage cans
More toddler equipment
More picnic tables or equipment at more parks
Provide transportation for better access to people that live far from the park Security cameras
Better walking paths (meandering) that connect parks, Trail network that you would be able to go from one park to another with vegetation: 4
Shorter passage to cut across to the park
Signage to local parks: 2
Make a garden park (themed), make each different
Use natural landscaping and native plants
Parking areas, not just on the street
More water fountains
Need larger parks
Make them closer: my neighborhood is distant from most parks: 2 Ask local residents to provide feedback
What is important that hasn’t been addressed here?
Bathrooms at more than one location: 2
Parks should host “park days” and each neighborhood should be responsible for its turnout and activities (involve neighborhoods around park): 2
Have more games
Paintball
Lighting in the South Park
Restrictions on beer

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 210 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
12 Inform people about the positive activities that they may do in the parks Draw people there, for example: garden club raffle or workshops, music festivals Sports Park should have horseshoe pit,
more benches, and BBQ pit
More trees and landscaping
Love that Patterson is park filled
Keep it family oriented and safe: 2 (Beer
drinking not family atmosphere): 3
Teenagers doing drugs in the park
Security: some parks (Garza) are scary to
go to because of the gangs, have the
police/volunteers patrol the area more: 5
Close to labor camp-Ghetto
Car theft, garages broken into
Lawn is not kept up in Garza (pot holes
should be filled in, dangerous to play
baseball): 2
Since children rely on
parental/guardian approval and
transportation to parks farther away,
those children living near parks with a
high likelihood of incidents are more at
risk to exposure of dangerous or unsafe
activity. Infrastructure improvements
should be considered within the City to
ensure the safety and access to parks
for people of all ages, but especially for
the population of children whom are
most vulnerable to barriers. Through
conscious planning and upgrades to
non-vehicle transportation access,
residents and visitors will also
encounter fewer barriers to parks. By
removing barriers to parks, Patterson
will help create a healthier
environment for its community with better access to recreational open space.

After reviewing a tally of parks that adults and
children visited it was interesting to note that the
parks with a higher likelihood of crime/traffic
incidents were those visited more frequently by
children than adults.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for CITY OF PATTERSON 211
8 APPENDICES

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
Partnership Type
Shared Expertise, Services & Talents
Loaned Executives - Employees share legal, financial, maintenance, management, marketing, graphic design, engineering and other expertise.

Volunteer Labor - Employees donate time and talents to special projects and events.

Volunteer Coordination - Designate a company staff person or its employee association to coordinate volunteer activity Training - Invite recreation and parks staff to attend corporate training programs, especially management training Efficiency Analysis - Determine the most efficient operations and maintenance practices for existing park areas
Energy Conservation - Share the company’s energy conservation program with your municipality
Adjoining Parkland - Maintain parkland adjacent to corporate land Professional Services - Donate services such as security, vehicle repair, plumbing and electrical work
Public Relations - Prepare marketing and public relations plans Surveys/Data Management - Collect and analyze community survey data Shared Equipment, Facilities and Supplies
Loaned Equipment - Lend vehicles, office equipment and the equipment needed for audio-visual presentations, printing and graphics, landscaping, construction and other activities
Loaned Space - Use indoor and outdoor corporate facilities for recreation programs, fundraisers or activities like community gardening Recycled Furniture, Supplies and Equipment - Donate used office furniture, equipment or construction materials such as cement and lumber Computer Time - Share programming expertise and/or use of the corporation’s computer equipment
Joint Purchasing - Jointly purchase equipment, materials and supplies Corporate Product - Contribute products for sampling or demonstration purposes Parking - Use company parking lots after hours for park areas and recreation facilities
Employee Recreation - Open employee recreation facilities to the general public.

Communications - Help to do mailings or prepare signs and brochures

APPENDIX D - PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERSHIP STRATEGIES

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for 212 CITY OF PATTERSON

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
8 APPENDICES
Donations and Dollars
Funding - Donate money through corporate foundations for specific needs Land - Donate land or offer leases and easements to the municipality Sponsorships - Support recreation programs, special events and sports teams with funds, t-shirts and/or volunteers in return for visibility Endowment/Revolving Fund - Set up an endowment with the interest going towards on-going agency costs or set up a revolving fund from which the agency might borrow.

Foundation - Organize a foundation through which contributions to park development and agency operations are channeled Gift Catalog - Use resources to design, produce and distribute a gift catalog and then contribute to it
Auction - Auction off equipment, land or supplies as fundraiser for the recreation and parks agency Team Challenges - Organize company teams to challenge other teams in the community, with fees going to the recreation and parks agency Scholarships - Provide a number of “scholarships” for low-income residents to participate in recreation programs
Advertising - Purchase advertising space in recreation program guides Name, Image, Prestige
Endorsement by Association - Lend its business name and prestige through sponsorship of team sports, special events and fundraisers to gain an image of community concern and involvement Direct Endorsement - Endorse the recreation and parks agency directly using business and community contacts and at the same time get the workd out about recreation opportunities and agency needs
Corporate Publications - Provide free public relations through coverage in the company newsletter of activities like upcoming programs, volunteer needs and fundraising progress.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Patterson_Parks_Master_Plan_FinalDraft2022_-_Compressed_File (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for City of Patterson—Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum Introduction
Introduction
This Addendum, checklist, and attached supporting documents have been prepared to determine whether and to what extent the 2010 City of Patterson General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 2010022035) prepared for the City of Patterson remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the proposed Parks and Recreation Master Plan (Master Plan), or whether additional documentation is required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] § 21000, et seq.).

Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, subd. (a), the attached initial study/checklist has been prepared to evaluate the proposed project.

The attached initial study/checklist uses the standard environmental checklist categories provided in the 2019 Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines but provides answer columns for evaluation consistent with the considerations listed under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subd. (a).

Environmental Analysis and Conclusions
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, subd. (a) provides that the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or Negative Declaration (ND) if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or ND have occurred (CEQA Guidelines § 15164, subd. (a)).

An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the Final EIR or ND (CEQA Guidelines § 15164, subd. (c)). The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the Final EIR and MND prior to making a decision on the project (CEQA Guidelines § 15164, subd. (d)). An agency must also include a brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR or ND pursuant to Section 15162 (CEQA Guidelines § 15164, subd. (e)).

Consequently, once an EIR has been certified or ND has been adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR or ND is required under CEQA unless, based on substantial evidence:
1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or ND . . . due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 1 2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or ND . . . due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the ND was adopted. . . shows any of the following:
1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15382 defines “significant effect on the environment” as “ . . . a substantial, or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance . . .” (see also PRC § 21068).

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) City of Patterson—Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum Introduction
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or ND or negative declaration;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR or ND;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR or ND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative (CEQA Guidelines § 15162, subd. (a); see also PRC § 21166).

This addendum, checklist, and attached documents constitute substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR or ND is not required prior to approval of the above-referenced permits by responsible and trustee agencies and provides the required documentation under CEQA.

This addendum addresses the conclusions of the General Plan EIR.

Background and Issues Presented
In November 2010, the City of Patterson adopted the City of Patterson 2010 General Plan update and certified the City of Patterson 2010 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse Number 2010022035). The 2010 General Plan includes the goals, policies, standards, implementation programs, quantified objectives, draft land use diagram, and preliminary circulation diagram recommended as the City’s formal policy for land use, development, and environmental quality. The General Plan identified the need for preparation of a Master Plan to guide the location and recreational priorities for parks and recreation facilities and the provision of services to properties located within the General Plan Study Area to meet Patterson’s needs as it developed toward the growth projections assumed in the General Plan. The City developed the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (Master Plan) to address parks and recreation considerations as the city grows as envisioned in the General Plan. Specifically, the Master Plan builds on the goals and objectives contained in the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Element of the 2010 General Plan and directly implements the General Plan policies and implementation measures cited below. 2010 Patterson General Plan
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources – Implementation Measures PR-1 The City shall maintain and update a Park and Recreation Facility Master Plan that establishes goals, policies, and standards for the location, size and level of development of all existing and proposed parks.

The Master Plan includes locational standards for parks, preferred sites, improvement and equipment standards, development priorities, financing mechanisms, consideration of community activity centers, sports facilities, and joint use facilities. The Plan also includes opinions of probable cost for new and upgraded facilities and documentation regarding existing conditions, facilities, studies, and regulations. The Master Plan includes a comprehensive review of the City’s parks and recreation facilities to identify improvements and expansions that are required to accommodate future growth anticipated by the General Plan and analyzed in the General Plan EIR.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) City of Patterson—Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum Introduction
Findings
There are no substantial changes proposed by the Master Plan or in the circumstances in which the project will be undertaken that require major revisions of the City of Patterson General Plan EIR. The proposed revisions do not require preparation of a new subsequent or supplemental EIR or MND, due to either the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. As illustrated herein, the project is consistent with the previous EIR and would involve only minor changes; therefore, an Addendum is appropriate CEQA compliance for the proposed project.

There are/are no substantial changes proposed by the Master Plan or in the circumstances in which the project will be undertaken that require major revisions of the Final EIR, or preparation of a new subsequent or supplemental EIR or MND, due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. As illustrated herein, the project is consistent with the Final EIR, and would involve only minor changes.

Conclusions
The General Plan contains policies and implementation measures that specifically call out the need for the Master Plan. The Master Plan was envisioned in the General Plan as a method to ensure adequate infrastructure and services are provided to growth that was anticipated in the General Plan and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The Master Plan would not provide for the expansion of services beyond that needed to accommodate the level of growth identified in the General Plan.

The City of Patterson, acting as the lead agency, determined that an Addendum is the appropriate environmental document under CEQA, because the proposed Master Plan would not require major revisions to the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the City of Patterson 2010 General Plan EIR. As required by Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, this determination must be supported by substantial evidence, which is included in the following analysis.

The City of Patterson may adopt the Parks and Recreation Master Plan based on this Addendum. The impacts of the proposed project remain within the impacts previously analyzed in the City of Patterson General Plan EIR (CEQA Guidelines § 15164).

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
CEQA Checklist
The purpose of the checklist is to evaluate the categories in terms of any changed condition (e.g., changed circumstances, project changes, or new information of substantial importance) that may result in a changed environmental result (e.g., a new significant impact or substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant effect) (CEQA Guidelines § 15162).

The questions posed in the checklist come from the 2019 Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. A “no” answer does not necessarily mean that there are no potential impacts relative to the environmental category, but that there is no change in the condition or status of the impact since it was analyzed and addressed with mitigation measures in the Final EIR or MND. These environmental categories might be answered with a “no” in the checklist, since the proposed project does not introduce changes that would result in a modification to the conclusion of the previously approved CEQA document.

This addendum addresses the conclusions of the City of Patterson General Plan EIR.

Explanation of Checklist Evaluation Categories
(1) Conclusion in City of Patterson General Plan EIR and Related Documents This column summarizes the conclusion of the City of Patterson General Plan EIR relative to the environmental issue listed under each topic.
(2) Do the Proposed Changes Involve New Impacts?
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subd. (a)(1), this column indicates whether the changes represented by the revised project will result in new significant environmental impacts not previously identified or mitigated by the City of Patterson General Plan EIR or whether the changes will result in a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact. (3) New Circumstances Involving New Impacts?
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subd. (a)(2), this column indicates whether there have been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the City of Patterson General Plan EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
(4) New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification? Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subd. (a)(3)(A–D), this column indicates whether new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the City of Patterson General Plan EIR was certified, shows any of the following:

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

If the additional analysis completed as part of this environmental review were to find that the conclusions of the City of Patterson General Plan EIR remain the same and no new significant impacts are identified, or identified impacts are not found to be substantially more severe, or additional mitigation is not necessary, then the question would be answered “no” and no additional environmental document would be required.
(5) Mitigation Measures Implemented or Address Impacts
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subd. (a)(3), this column indicates whether the City of Patterson General Plan EIR provides mitigation measures to address effects in the related impact category. Any previously adopted mitigation measures will be identified on the checklist; however, not all identified mitigation measures will be applicable to the proposed project.

Mitigation measures that are not applicable to the proposed project will be identified. The response will also address proposed revisions to previously adopted mitigation measures. These mitigation measures will be implemented with the construction of the project, as applicable. If “NA” is indicated, the Final EIR has concluded that the impact either does not occur with this Project or is not significant, and therefore no additional mitigation measures are needed.

Discussion and Mitigation Sections
(1) Discussion
A discussion of the elements of the checklist is provided under each environmental category in order to clarify the answers. The discussion provides information about the particular environmental issue, how the project relates to the issue, and the status of any mitigation that may be required or that has already been implemented.
(2) Mitigation Measures
Applicable mitigation measures from the General Plan EIR that apply to the project are listed under each environmental category.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
(3) Conclusions
A discussion of the conclusion relating to the analysis is contained in each section.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
I. Aesthetics, Light, and Glare
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
Significant
and
Unavoidable
No No No CD-1
b) Substantially damage
scenic resources,
including, but not
limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and
historic building within a
State Scenic Highway?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
c) In non-urbanized areas,
substantially degrade
the existing visual
character or quality of
public views of the site
and its surroundings?
(Public views are those
that are experienced
from publicly accessible
vantage point). If the
project is in an
urbanized area, would
the project conflict with
applicable zoning and
other regulations
governing scenic
quality?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare
which would adversely
affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
Significant
and
Unavoidable
No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the City of Patterson General Plan would have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas from Interstate 5 (a State Designated Scenic Highway), and will substantially affect scenic resources and degrade the scenic qualities within the Study Area within the growth boundaries. lines. The EIR noted that the impacts would be significant and unavoidable. The EIR

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
included mitigation measure CD-1 “The City shall implement the Community Design Guidelines and Downtown Physical Design Plan.”
The Master Plan includes guidance for timing, size, and general location of parks and recreation facilities to accommodate growth identified in the General Plan. The Master Plan would not alter assumptions in the EIR regarding the potential for adverse impacts to identified scenic vistas. b) The Master Plan does not contemplate damage to scenic resources. No impact is anticipated as a result of the Master Plan.
c) The project will continue to be subject to the City’s community design guidelines and would not significantly impact scenic quality.
d) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan area would introduce new sources of lighting but noted that full cutoff fixtures or shielding would prevent light trespass on to adjacent properties.

While development consistent with the Master Plan would introduce new sources of light, these impacts are considered in the General Plan. Development consistent with the Master Plan would be subject to requirements requiring cutoff fixtures or shielding to prevent glare. No additional impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
II. Agricultural and Forest Resources
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime
Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide
Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping
and Monitoring
Program of the
California Resources
Agency, to nonagricultural use?
Significant
unavoidable
impact
No No No None
b) Conflict with existing
zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
N/A No No No None
c) Conflict with existing
zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land
(as defined in Public
Resources Code Section
12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public
Resources Code Section
4526), or timberland
zoned Timberland
Production (as defined
by Government Code
Section 51104(g))?
N/A No No No None
d) Result in the loss of
forest land or
conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
N/A No No No None

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
e) Involve other changes in
the existing
environment which, due
to their location or
nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland,
to non-agricultural use
or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the City of Patterson General Plan would permanently covert prime farmland to non-agricultural use. This impact was determined to be significant and unavoidable.

The Master Plan identifies several properties currently designated as Prime or Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance for development as park space or other recreational uses. Such development is contemplated in the General Plan and would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR. b) The EIR did not evaluate conflicts with agricultural zoning or Williamson Act contract. Development consistent with the development plan would be consistent with the general plan land use designations and would require that any land under a Williamson Act contract, be removed from such contract prior to development. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
c) The EIR did not evaluate conflicts with forest zoning. There is no forest zoning in or around the City of Patterson General Plan area. No conflicts would occur. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
d) The EIR did not evaluate conversion of forestland to non-forest use. No forestland exists in or around the City of Patterson General Plan area. No conflicts would occur. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
e) The Master Plan does not contemplate changes of use inconsistent with the General Plan. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Mitigation Measures
None
Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
III. Air Quality
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.

Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality
plan?
Less than
significant
No No No None
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net
increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the
project region is nonattainment under an
applicable federal or
state ambient air quality
standard?
Significant
and
unavoidable
and
cumulatively
considerable
No No No AR-1 and
AR-2
c) Expose sensitive
receptors to substantial
pollutant
concentrations?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No AR-1 and
AR-2
d) Result in other
emissions (such as those
leading to odors or)
adversely affecting a
substantial number of
people?
Less than
significant
No No No None
Discussion
a–b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would generate construction and operation emissions that would exceed San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (Valley Air District) thresholds for ozone precursors and particulate matter. The EIR set forth AR-1 and AR-2 that require review of development projects related to air quality standards. Because the emissions control measures do not reduce project emissions to below Valley Air District thresholds, the EIR concluded that impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

Implementation of the Master Plan would result in construction and operation emissions, but not to an extent that impacts would be generated above that considered in the General Plan. Any projects would be subject to AR-1 and AR-2. The Master Plan would not introduce new

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
c) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would result in emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants during construction and operation that may expose nearby sensitive receptors to unhealthful levels of pollution. The EIR set forth AR-1 and AR-2 to review and mitigate potential development issues.

The EIR concluded that these impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

The Master Plan proposes development consistent with the General Plan. While construction and operation may result in emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants that may expose nearby sensitive receptors to unhealthful levels of pollution, such impacts are considered by the EIR. Any proposed development would be reviewed consistent with the mitigation requirements. The project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
d) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would not generate significant new objectionable odors. The Master Plan does not contemplate projects that would be expected to generate new obbjectionable odors. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR Mitigation Measures
AR-1 The City will ensure that development projects are submitted to the District for CEQA comments and review of air quality analysis.

AR-2 The City will train staff planners preparing CEQA documents on how to use the Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts guidance manual.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
IV. Biological Resources
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect, either
directly or through
habitat modifications,
on any species identified
as a candidate,
sensitive, or special
status species in local or
regional plans, policies,
or regulations, or by the
California Department
of Fish and Game or U.S.

Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Significant
and
unavoidable
and
cumulatively
considerable
No No No NR-12
b) Have a substantial
adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural
community identified in
local or regional plans,
policies, and regulations
or by the California
Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Less than
significant
impact with
mitigation
No No No NR-12
c) Have a substantial
adverse effect on state
or federally protected
wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct
removal, filling,
hydrological
interruption, or other
means?
Less than
significant
impact with
mitigation
No No No NR-12
d) Interfere substantially
with the movement of
any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife
species or with
established native
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of
wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local
policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
ordinance?
N/A No No No None
f) Conflict with the
provisions of an
adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan,
Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or
other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
N/A No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may result in potentially significant impacts to several special-status species, including Swainson’s hawk, San Joaquin kit fox, western burrowing owl, western pond turtle, and nesting birds. The EIR set forth NR-12 that require pre-construction surveys, in locations that may adversely affect special status species. The EIR concluded that impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

The Master Plan does not contemplate development not already considered by the EIR. No new or additional impacts would be created for special-status species that have not already been considered in the EIR. The Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR. b) The EIR found that the development of a wastewater treatment facility had the potential to impact riparian habitat. The EIR set forth NR-12, which requires establishment of a 100-foot setback around the riparian habitat. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

The Master Plan does not involve the development of a wastewater treatment facility and, therefore, NR-13 does not apply to the project. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
c) The EIR found that development activities associated with buildout of the general Plan had the potential to impact wetland environments. The EIR set forth NR-12 to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.

The Master Plan contemplates potential for trails near wetland areas, which would be well within impacts considered by the EIR. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR. d) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may impact movement of migratory species, but not to a level of significance. The proposed project does not consider development inconsistent with the General Plan and would not create new impacts to migratory species. The proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
e) The EIR did not evaluate conflicts with local biological ordinances. The City of Patterson does not have a sensitive naturally occurring tree preservation policy, so no conflict would occur. f) The EIR did not evaluate conflicts with conservation plans. The project site is not located within the boundaries of an adopted habitat conservation plan. No conflicts would occur.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
V. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of a
historical resource as
pursuant to Section
15064.5?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No PR-8
b) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to Section
15064.5?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No PR-8
c) Disturb any human
remains, including those
interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No PR-8
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
d) Listed or eligible for
listing in the California
Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local
register of historical
resources as defined in
Public Resources Code
Section 5020.1(k), or
No impact No No No None
e) A resource determined
by the lead agency, in its
discretion and
supported by
substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant
to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resource Code Section
No impact No No No None

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
5024.1, the lead agency
shall consider the
significance of the
resource to a California
Native American tribe.

Discussion
Cultural Resources
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan had the potential to disturb historic resources. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant if the following conditions are placed on all discretionary projects:

The Planning Department shall be notified immediately if any prehistoric, archaeological, or fossil artifact or resource is uncovered during construction. All construction must stop and an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in prehistoric or historical archaeology shall be retained to evaluate the finds and recommend appropriate action.

All construction must stop if any human remains are uncovered, and the County Coroner must be notified according to Section 7050.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the procedures outlined in CEQA Section 15064.5 (d) and (e) shall be followed.

The proposed project does not include development at this time and reviews have found no records of known historic resources within the project boundaries. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan had the potential to disturb archaeological resources. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant if the previously listed conditions are placed on all discretionary projects.

The proposed project does not include development at this time and reviews have found no records of known archaeological resources within the project boundaries. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
c) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan had the potential to disturb human remains. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant if the previously listed conditions are placed on all discretionary projects.

The proposed project does not include development at this time and reviews have found no records of known burial sites within the project boundaries. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

Tribal Cultural Resources
d–e) The EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan would not impact tribal cultural resources.

Mitigation Measures
PR-8 The City shall impose the following conditions on all discretionary projects which may cause ground disturbance:

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
VI. Energy
Would the project:
a) Result in potentially
significant
environmental impact
due to wasteful,
inefficient, or
unnecessary
consumption of energy
resources, during
project construction or
operation?
N/A No No No None
b) Conflict with or obstruct
a state or local plan for
renewable energy or
energy efficiency?
N/A No No No None
Discussion
a–b) The EIR did not evaluate impacts on energy. The proposed project includes no development activities at this time. Development projects would be considered on a case by case basis for energy use. The proposed project has the potential to generate additional vehicle trips, but not to a level of significance beyond that previously contemplated by the General Plan EIR. Thus, energy consumption would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary. Impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
VII. Geology, Seismicity, and Soils
Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known
earthquake fault, as
delineated on the
most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State
Geologist for the
area or based on
other substantial
evidence of a known
fault? Refer to
Division of Mines
and Geology Special
Publication 42.

Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
ii) Strong seismic
ground shaking?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
iii) Seismic-related
ground failure,
including
liquefaction?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
iv) Landslides? Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
b) Result in substantial soil
erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
c) Be located on a geologic
unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would
become unstable as a
result of the project,
and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide,
lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
d) Be located on expansive
soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994),
creating substantial
direct or indirect risks to
life or property?
N/A No No No None
e) Have soils incapable of
adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks
or alternative
wastewater disposal
systems where sewers
are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
N/A No No No None
f) Directly or indirectly
destroy a unique
paleontological resource
or site or unique
geologic feature?
N/A No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may result in exposure to seismic hazards such as fault rupture, ground shaking, liquefaction, and land sliding. The EIR noted that compliance with Building Standards Code seismic safety requirements would ensure that new development is not exposed to geologic hazards. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

The General Plan area is not within a designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Standard earthwork, soil engineering, and construction practices (e.g., grading, placement of engineered fill, pouring of slab foundations, etc.) would serve to abate any strong ground shaking hazards. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may result in erosion and sedimentation. The EIR noted that implementation of State requirements, such as Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans, would ensure that new development does not create erosion or sedimentation. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant
Any development contemplated by the Master Plan would be required to comply with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan requirements during construction to prevent erosion into downstream

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
waterways. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR. c) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may result in exposure to unstable soils and geologic units. The EIR noted that compliance with Building Standards Code seismic safety requirements would ensure that new development would not be exposed to geologic hazards. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

Any project contemplated by the Master Plan would be subject to applicable building codes. No new or additional impacts are anticipated. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
d) The EIR did not evaluate impacts on expansive soils. The project site is underlain by Capay clay and Stomar clay loam soils, which contain clay and, thus, would be considered expansive.

Implementation of Standard earthwork and soil engineering practices (e.g., excavation of native soils and replacement with engineered fill) during construction would serve to abate any expansive soils hazards. Impacts would be less than significant.
e) The EIR did not evaluate impacts associated with septic tanks. Any new development would be served with wastewater collection and treatment service provided by the City of Patterson. No septic or alternative wastewater disposal systems would be employed. No impact would occur. f) The EIR did not evaluate impacts on paleontological resources. Patterson is underlain by Pleistocene alluvium, which has a high sensitivity for paleontological deposits. The proposed project’s grading activities are expected to be limited to the upper soil layers, which avoids disturbance of native soils that may contain paleontological resources. Nonetheless, the City will apply the following standard condition of approval to the project:

All soil disturbance in excess of 10 feet in depth should be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor. In the event that fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during construction activities, excavations within a 100-foot radius of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted. The project contractor shall notify a qualified paleontologist to examine the discovery. The applicant shall include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. The paleontologist shall document the discovery as needed in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction activities are allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the applicant determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of construction activities on the discovery. The plan shall be submitted to the City of Patterson for review and approval prior to implementation, and the applicant shall adhere to the recommendations in the plan.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
With the implementation of this condition of approval, impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
VIII.Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse
gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly,
that may have a
significant impact on the
environment?
N/A No No No None
b) Conflict with any
applicable plan, policy
or regulation adopted
for the purpose of
reducing the emissions
of greenhouse gases?
N/A No No No None
Discussion
a–b) The EIR did not evaluate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. No development is contemplated at this time, so no impact to GHG emissions is anticipated. Development projects associated with implementation of the Master Plan would be designed in accordance with the latest adopted edition of the Title 24 building energy efficiency standards, which are regarded as the most stringent in the United States. Impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Would the project:
a) Create a significant
hazard to the public or
the environment
through the routine
transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous
materials?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
b) Create a significant
hazard to the public or
the environment
through reasonably
foreseeable upset and
accident conditions
involving the release of
hazardous materials into
the environment?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
c) Emit hazardous
emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials,
substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile
of an existing or
proposed school?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
d) Be located on a site
which is included on a
list of hazardous
materials sites compiled
pursuant to
Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as
a result, would it create
a significant hazard to
the public or the
environment?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
e) For a project located
within an airport land
use plan or, where such
a plan has not been
adopted, within two
miles of a public airport
or public use airport,
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
would the project result
in a safety hazard or
excessive noise for
people residing or
working in the project
area?
f) Impair implementation
of or physically interfere
with an adopted
emergency response
plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
g) Expose people or
structures, either
directly or indirectly to a
significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving
wildland fires?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a–b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would not result in significant exposure to hazardous materials due to management policies under the direction of the Federal and State Governments. With compliance with these requirements, the EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

No development is considered, at this time. The Master Plan does not contemplate development that would create new or expanded exposure to hazardous materials. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
c–d) The EIR found that area uses would not result in exposure to hazardous materials at schools or near other sites. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

The Master Plan does not contemplate development that would result in new or additional sources of hazardous materials near schools or other sensitive locations. The Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
e) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would not be significantly impacted by airport uses.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
The proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
f) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would not conflict with established emergency response plans or evacuation plans. The EIR reviewed potential issues related to disruption of emergency services due to impediments at rail crossings but determined that such impacts were less than significant.

The proposed project would not significantly alter the approach to emergency response plans or evacuation plans. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR. g) The EIR found that any potential for impacts related to wildfire would be located on the west side of Interstate 5. The EIR found these impacts to be less than significant.

No new development projects associated with the Master Plan are contemplated at this time.

Specific development projects that may be located in areas at risk for wildfires would be subject to additional review. The Master Plan would not expose the public to significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fire. Impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
None
Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
X. Hydrology and Water Quality
Would the project:
a) Violate any water
quality standards or
waste discharge
requirements or
otherwise substantially
degrade surface or
ground water quality?
Less than
significant
impact with
mitigation
No No No HS-1, PS-5,
NR-1, PS-6,
PS-7
b) Substantially decrease
groundwater supplies
or interfere
substantially with
groundwater recharge
such that the project
may impede sustainable
groundwater
management of the
basin?
Significant
and
Unavoidable
and
cumulatively
considerable
No No No NR-2, PS-1,
PS-2, PS-6,
PS-7, AR-1,
AR-2, HS-6,
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
(i) result in substantial
erosion or siltation
on- or off-site;
Less than
significant
impact with
mitigation
No No No HS-1, PS-5,
NR-1, PS-6,
PS-7
(ii) substantially
increase the rate or
amount of surface
runoff in a manner
which would result
in flooding on- or
offsite;
Less than
significant
impact with
mitigation
No No No HS-15
(iii) create or contribute
runoff water which
would exceed the
capacity of existing
or planned
stormwater drainage
systems or provide
substantial
additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
Significant
and
Unavoidable
and
cumulatively
considerable
No No No HS-1, PS-5,
NR-1, PS-6,
PS-7

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
(iv) impede or redirect
flood flows?
Significant
and
Unavoidable
No No No HS-1, PS-5,
NR-1, PS-6,
PS-7
d) In flood hazard,
tsunami, or seiche
zones, risk release of
pollutants due to
project inundation?
Less than
significant
No No No PS-5, PS-11
e) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a
water quality control
plan or sustainable
groundwater
management plan?
Less than
significant
impact with
mitigation
No No No HS-15
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may result in the discharge of polluted runoff from the construction of future urban development, potentially causing harm to waterways, violating water quality standards, or otherwise substantially degrading surface water quality. The EIR set in place mitigation measures that require implementation of stormwater pollution prevention measures. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

Development projects contemplated by the Master Plan could create new impervious surfaces, which have the potential to generate polluted runoff. Any development would be subject to Storm Water Pollution Prevent Plan (SWPPP) requirements during construction. No new or additional impacts are anticipated As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR. b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would increase demand for water, requiring additional water supplies beyond what was available to the City, would require the extension of water conveyance infrastructure, and could create one or more “cones of depression” beneath City wells, all deemed to be significant and unavoidable impacts.

Since the time of the General Plan review, the City has completed a more thorough review of the area’s groundwater capacity and determined that the safe yield of groundwater extracted from the aquifer is adequate to serve the buildout of the General Plan area, when combined with conservation and other measures. While no development is contemplated at this time, new parks and recreation facilities will likely generate new sources of water use. Individual projects will be subject to further review as they are proposed and would be reviewed by the City to ensure that

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
the City’s water infrastructure is adequate. The Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
c) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may place housing or other structures into 100- year flood hazard areas and create new impervious surfaces that would alter drainage conditions that could result in increased runoff and potential flooding impacts. In sum, the EIR concluded that these impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

The Master Plan does not include development at this time. Individual projects will be subject to additional reviewed to ensure that adequate storm drain infrastructure is in place to limit runoff and potential flooding impacts. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
d) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may place housing or other structures into 100- year flood hazard areas. The EIR set forth mitigation measures to ensure that new buildings be elevated to 1-foot above the flood elevation. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

The Master Plan does not contemplate development inconsistent with the General Plan and would be subject to the mitigation measures discussed above. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

Mitigation Measures
NR-1 The City shall continue its program of routinely monitoring groundwater quality.

NR-2 The Within 24 months of adoption of the General Plan, the City shall prepare and adopt a comprehensive water conservation plan, which includes but is not limited to, the following:
a. Landscape watering timing restrictions;
b. Requirements for water-efficient irrigation equipment for all new private and public development;
c. Enforcement strategies for water waste;
d. Recommendations for water-efficient landscape ordinances; e. Evaluation of and recommendations for water conservation pricing (such as a tiered rates for water users) to encourage efficient use;
f. Strategies for providing individualized water audits for large accounts to identify conservation opportunities;
g. Requirements for water efficiency training and certification for irrigation designers, installers, and property managers operating within the City.

The City has adopted a Water Master Plan. This mitigation measure does not apply to this project and will be reevaluated at the development stage.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
PS-1 The City shall review and periodically update the City’s Water Master Plan and Urban Water Management Plan consistent with the land use patterns and densities/intensities specified in the General Plan.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

PS-2 The City shall develop and implement a water pipeline replacement and water meter replacement program.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project at the development stage infrastructure conditions will be triggered and evaluated.

PS-5 The City shall prepare, adopt, review, and periodically update Drainage Master Plans for all new development and annexation areas.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

PS-6 New development shall prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) designed to reduce potential impacts to surface water quality through the construction and life of the project whether or not the development site is over one acre. The SWPPP shall include practices to minimize the contact of construction materials, equipment, and maintenance supplies (e.g., fuels, lubricants, paints, solvents, adhesives) with storm water.

The SWPPP shall specify properly designed centralized storage areas that keep these materials out of the rain.

The SWPPP shall specify a monitoring program to be implemented by the construction site supervisor and must include both dry and wet weather inspections. In addition, in accordance with State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2001-046 monitoring would be required during the construction period for pollutants that may be present in the runoff that are “not visually detectable in runoff.”
Best Management Practices (BMPs) designed to reduce erosion of exposed soil may include, but are not limited to, soil stabilization controls, watering for dust control, perimeter silt fences, placement of hay bales, and sediment basins.

If grading must be conducted during the rainy season, the primary BMPs selected shall focus on erosion control, that is, keeping sediment on the site. End-of-pipe sediment control measures (e.g., basins and traps) shall be used only as secondary measures. Entry and egress from the construction site shall be carefully controlled to minimize off-site tracking of sediment. Vehicle and equipment washdown facilities shall be designed to be accessible and functional during both dry and wet conditions.

All development projects are subject to SWPPP requirements.

PS-7 The City shall require the preparation of Project Stormwater Management Plans (SMP) to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer for development projects as required by State law.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
or the consultant retained by the sponsor to prepare the SMP shall thoroughly review and comply with the requirements of the most current municipal Phase II General Permit for storm water discharges (Order No. 2003-0005-DWQ). In general, passive, low-maintenance BMPs are preferred.

The City of Patterson Department of Public Works shall ensure that the Project Stormwater Management Plan is prepared prior to approval of any grading plans. The City of Patterson Department of Public Works shall review and ensure that the SWPPP for each development project within the Plan Area complies with or updates the Project Stormwater Management Plan.

All development is subject to this requirement.

PS-11 The City shall establish and collect development impact fees as needed for public services in accordance with Government Code '66000, et seq.

Development would be subject to this mitigation measure.

AR-1 Ensure that development projects are submitted to the District for CEQA comments and review of air quality analysis.

Development projects are subject to this mitigation measure.

AR-2 Train staff planners preparing CEQA documents on how to use the Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts guidance manual.

This mitigation measure does not apply to the project.

HS-1 The City shall adopt the most current editions of the California Building Code, California Fire Code, Uniform Plumbing, Mechanical, and National Electric Codes.

HS-6 Prior to approval of a noise-sensitive use exposed to existing or projected noise exceeding the standards of the General Plan, an acoustical analysis shall be required. The acoustical analysis shall comply with the requirements set out in Table HS-2 of the Policy Document.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

HS-15 New development shall be required to implement (through installation or the payment of inlieu fees) relevant portions of the March 2010 City of Patterson General Plan Storm Drainage Study.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XI. Land Use and Planning
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an
established community?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
b) Cause a significant
environmental impact
due to a conflict with
any land use plan, policy,
or regulation adopted
for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan has the potential to disrupt established communities, but that any impacts would be mitigated through existing regulations. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

The Master Plan considers parks and recreational facilities within the General Plan area. General Plan and Zoning policies aim to create “complete neighborhoods.” Park and recreational facilities are anticipated to tie communities together rather than disrupt established communities. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan had the potential to create conflicts between current and future land uses, as well as new development and agricultural uses. The EIR determined that these impacts are mitigated through existing regulations. The EIR also noted that the proposed project would amend the General Plan and would pre-zone the affected properties to reflect their proposed use, thereby achieving consistency with the respective plans. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Mitigation Measures
None.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XII. Mineral Resources
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of
availability of a known
mineral resource that
would be of value to the
region and the residents
of the State?
N/A No No No None
b) Result in the loss of
availability of a locallyimportant mineral
resource recovery site
delineated on a local
general plan, specific
plan or other land use
plan?
N/A No No No None
Discussion
a–b) The EIR did not evaluate loss of mineral resources. No extraction activities of minerals of value occur are contemplated as part of the Master Plan. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XIII. Noise
Would the project:
a) Generation of a
substantial temporary
or permanent increase
in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the
project in excess of
standards established in
the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of
other agencies?
Significant
and
unavoidable
and
cumulatively
considerable
No No No HS-5, HS-6,
HS-7, HS-8,
HS-10
b) Generation of excessive
ground borne vibration
or ground borne noise
levels?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
c) For a project located
within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an
airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has
not been adopted,
within two miles of a
public airport or public
use airport, would the
project expose people
residing or working in
the project area to
excessive noise levels?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may expose sensitive receptors to elevated noise levels. Areas of interest included construction activities, which were mitigatable to a less than significant level with implementation measures HS-5, HS-6, and HS-7, and traffic noise levels, which were deemed to be significant and unavoidable, even with implementation measures HS-5, HS-6, HS-7, HS-8. The potential for noise-sensitive land uses to encroach upon existing or proposed noise sources was also deemed to be significant and unavoidable. Other noise impacts were deemed to be less than significant.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
No new development is contemplated at this time. However, existing City policies and the zoning code, require additional review when land use interface conditions occur to mitigate potential conflicts for projects or land uses expected to generate higher than typical noise levels. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
b) The EIR found that impacts related to land uses exposed to ground borne vibration impacts were considered less than significant. No information at this time would indicate that land uses would be exposed to ground borne vibration impacts greater than those reviewed in the EIR as a result of implementation of the Master Plan. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
c) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would not expose persons working or residing in the General Plan area to excessive aviation noise levels. Although the Crows Landing Airfield is in close proximity to the City of Patterson, impacts were not considered to reach a level of significance. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

The Master Plan does not contemplate impacts different or additional to those considered in the EIR. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

Mitigation Measures
HS-5 The City shall review and revise as necessary its noise control ordinance to regulate existing noise sources. (The City of Patterson has updated it’s zoning code to regulate noise sources. This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.)
HS-6 Prior to approval of a noise-sensitive use exposed to existing or projected noise exceeding the standards of the General Plan, an acoustical analysis shall be required. The acoustical analysis shall comply with the requirements set out in Table HS-2 of the Policy Document. (This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.)
HS-7 The City shall enforce state noise insulation standards (California Administrative Code, Title 24) and Chapter 35 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Title 24 requires that an acoustical analysis be prepared for all new developments of multi-family dwellings, condominiums, hotels and motels proposed for areas within the 60 Db Ld], contour of a major noise source for the purpose of documenting that an acceptable interior noise level of 45 Db L~ or below will be achieved. UBC Chapter 35 requires that common wall and floor/ceiling assemblies within multifamily dwellings comply with minimum standards for the transmission of airborne sound and structure-borne impact noise.

HS-8 The City shall develop and employ procedures to monitor compliance with noise mitigation standards after projects are completed. (This mitigation measure applies to development, so does not apply to this project.)
HS-10 The City shall require the following as a condition of project approval to mitigate the adverse noise effects of construction-related activities:

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
• Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, with no construction on Sundays or federal and state holidays; minor construction equipment servicing, and maintenance will be exempted from this restriction. • During construction, mufflers shall be provided for all heavy construction equipment and all stationary noise sources in accordance with the manufacturers’ recommendations.
• Stationary noise sources and staging areas shall be located as far as is feasible from existing residences, or contractors shall be required to provide additional noisereducing engine enclosures (with the goal of achieving approximately 10 dBA of reduction compared to uncontrolled engines).
• Air compressors and pneumatic equipment shall be equipped with mufflers, and impact tools shall be equipped with shrouds or shields. • If for construction purposes, locating stationary construction equipment near existing residential uses is required, an eight-foot-tall sound rated fence shall be erected between the equipment and the sensitive receptor. The fence shall be located as close to the equipment as is feasible.
• Construction vehicle access routes shall be designed to minimize the impact on existing residences and occupied hospital facilities.
• A “construction liaison” shall be designated to ensure coordination between construction staff and neighbors to minimize disruptions due to construction noise.

Occupants and property owners of residences within 400 feet of construction activity shall be notified in writing of the construction schedule and the contact information for the construction liaison.
• A qualified acoustical engineer shall be retained during the construction phase of the project to determine if the noise levels generated from construction equipment at the project site to adjacent property lines are within the standards. (Any development projects within the project area would be subject to this mitigation measure.)
Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XIV. Population and Housing
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial
unplanned population
growth in an area,
either directly (for
example, by proposing
new homes and
businesses) or indirectly
(for example, through
extension of roads or
other infrastructure)?
Significant
and
unavoidable
and
cumulatively
considerable
No No No None
b) Displace substantial
numbers of existing
people or housing,
necessitating the
construction of
replacement housing
elsewhere?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would result in a significant increase in population, housing, and employment. As a matter of course, the General Plan is aimed at continued growth of the City of Patterson for at least a 40-year period. While growth is needed and inevitable the EIR never-the-less determined this impact to be significant and unavoidable.

The Master Plan does not contemplate increases to population, housing or employment beyond what is considered by the General Plan. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan had the potential to displace existing dwelling units as the City expands. The EIR determined that although such units would be displaced, they would be replaced by a substantial number of new units in a variety of densities and product types. The EIR determined the project to be less than significant.

The Master Plan does not consider development that is anticipated to displace existing dwelling units. Individual development projects would be subject to further review. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Mitigation Measures
None
Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XV. Public Services
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
b) Police protection? Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
c) Schools? Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
d) Parks? Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
e) Other public
facilities?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would increase demand for fire protection, including the need for new fire stations, equipment and personnel. The EIR noted that new development that occurs within the General Plan would provide capital improvement fees to the City of Patterson for the construction of new stations. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

While no development is contemplated at this time, future development would contribute incrementally to the demand for fire stations, equipment, and personnel. These impacts are anticipated in the EIR. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR. b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would increase demand for police protection. The EIR found that, because police protection is typically provided by patrolling law enforcement personnel, desired response times could be accommodated through an increase to law enforcement personnel and increased or expanded police stations. The EIR determined that these

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
impacts could be mitigated through capital improvement fees. The EIR concluded that this impact would be less than significant.

While no development is contemplated at this time, future development would contribute incrementally to the demand for increased police protection. These impacts are anticipated in the EIR. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR. c) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would generate additional students with a corresponding increase in the demand for school facilities provided by the Patterson Joint Unified School District. Although no mitigation is available to the City, the school district uses school fees to pay for the construction of new school facilities. The EIR found this impact to be less than significant.

Implementation of the Master Plan will not generate additional students. No new or additional impact is anticipated.
d) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would increase the demand for parks and recreational facilities. Consistent with the Quincy Act, the General Plan requires that parkland be developed concurrently or in advance of population growth to achieve the desired ratio of 5 acres of parkland per 1,000 population. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

The Master Plan responds to impacts anticipated by the General Plan. Implementation of the General Plan would mitigate anticipated issues outlined in the EIR. e) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would increase the demand for new health care facilities, landfill capacity, library services, demand for electricity and natural gas, and other utility services. The EIR determined that, while the City could not mitigate these impacts directly, demand for new health care facilities, landfill capacity and library services could be accommodated through local district and county fees. The demand for electricity, natural gas, and other utility services could be accommodated through expansion of existing services. These impacts were determined to be less than significant.

Implementation of the Master Plan is not anticipated to trigger the need for significant expansion to other public services beyond what was contemplated in the EIR. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XVI.Recreation
Would the project:
a) Would the project
increase the use of
existing neighborhood
and regional parks or
other recreational
facilities such that
substantial physical
deterioration of the
facility would occur or
be accelerated?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
b) Does the project include
recreational facilities or
require the construction
or expansion of
recreational facilities,
which might have an
adverse physical effect
on the environment?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a–b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would increase the demand for parks and recreational facilities. Consistent with the Quincy Act, the General Plan requires that parkland be developed concurrently or in advance of population growth to achieve the desired ratio of 5 acres of parkland per 1,000 population. The EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

The Master Plan responds to anticipated impacts outlined in the General Plan EIR. Implementation of the Master Plan would implement the General Plan. No new impacts are anticipated.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XVII. Transportation
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program
plan, ordinance or policy
of the circulation
system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
Significant
unavoidable
impact
No No No T-3, T-4, T-5,
T-6, T-7, T11, T-12, T13, T-14
b) Would the project
conflict or be
inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines Section
15064.3, subdivision (b)?
N/A No No No None
c) Substantially increase
hazards due to a
geometric design
feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No T-2, T-3, T-4,
T-11, T-12,
T-13, T-14,
HS-5, HS-6,
HS-7, HS-8
d) Result in inadequate
emergency access?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may impact intersection and roadway segments so that they would not operate at a minimum level of service consistent with City of Patterson or Caltrans standards. Mitigation measures were set in place for intersections and roadway segments within the City of Patterson, however, the City does not have direct control over several intersections and roadway segments outside of the City limits and under the jurisdiction of Stanislaus County or Caltrans. The EIR concluded that impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

The Master Plan has been developed in conjunction with the Transportation Infrastructure Master Plan, which, in turn, was prepared in reference to the General Plan. No new impacts are anticipated not already previously considered by the EIR

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
b) The EIR did not evaluate vehicle miles traveled. While implementation of the Master Plan can be anticipated to contribute toward vehicle trips, no development is considered at this time.

Individual projects will need to be considered on a case-by-case basis. The Master Plan does include provisions to locate park space as close as possible (in most cases, within easy walking distance) of housing, which will limits vehicle miles travelled. c) The EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan had the potential to increase truck traffic through the City, which, in turn, could adversely impact residential neighborhoods and result in potential traffic impacts on area roadways. Mitigation measures were set in place for intersections and roadway segments within the City of Patterson, however, the City does not have direct control over several intersections and roadway segments outside of the City limits and under the jurisdiction of Stanislaus County or Caltrans. The EIR concluded that impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

The Master Plan is not anticipated to contribute to the conditions outlined that would substantially increase incompatible uses. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
d) The EIR determined that with proper development standards in place, buildout of the General Plan would not result in significant impacts associated with emergency response. The EIR determined that impacts would be less than significant.

The Master Plan is not anticipated to contribute to new or additional impacts to emergency access not already considered by the EIR. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

Mitigation Measures
T-2 The City shall maintain a Street Master Plan showing the existing and proposed ultimate rights-of-way and street width for each road segment within the city. The Street Master Plan shall be based on the adopted Circulation Diagram and indicate the necessary rights-of-way to be acquired or dedicated. The Street Master Plan shall be regularly updated.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

T-3 The City shall prepare, adopt, and periodically update a long-term Capital Improvements Program (CIP) that includes traffic, pedestrian and bikeway improvements.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

T-4 The City shall prepare and adopt a traffic impact development fee program to pay for key improvements necessitated by new development, including transit.

Any development shall be subject to appropriate traffic impact development fees.

T-5 The City shall operate the traffic signal system to maximize traffic flow. The timing of traffic signals shall be updated at least once every four years. (See Implementation Measure NR-7.)

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

T-6 The City shall continue to investigate new technologies to help ensure the transportation system operates at the highest efficiency for the lowest cost.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

T-7 The City shall prepare roadway design standards for new and existing streets, roads and roundabouts. Such standards should include right-of-way width, roadway section design, and dedication requirements for new development to accommodate traffic levels expected at buildout of the General Plan. The roadway design standards should be interpreted with flexibility so that the roadways provided are no wider than required to maintain safe and efficient circulation and access.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

T-11 The City shall work with Caltrans to prepare a Project Study Report (PSR) for a new interchange north of the City in the vicinity of Zacharias Road and Interstate 5.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

T-12 The City shall participate in efforts to establish a South County Corridor to connect East Las Palmas Avenue with Interstate 5.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

T-13 The City shall work with Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG), Caltrans and other agencies to obtain funding for major traffic improvements that serve the region.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

T-14 The City shall vigorously pursue and use state and federal funds earmarked for bicycle and transit improvements.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

HS-5 The City shall review and revise as necessary its noise control ordinance to regulate existing noise sources.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

Individual development projects shall be analyzed on a case by case basis.

HS-7 The City shall enforce state noise insulation standards (California Administrative Code, Title 24) and Chapter 35 of the Uniform Building Code (UB C). Title 24 requires that an acoustical analysis be prepared for all new developments of multi-family dwellings, condominiums, hotels and motels proposed for areas within the 60 Db Ld], contour of a major noise source for the purpose of documenting that an acceptable interior noise level of 45 Db L~ or below will be achieved. TJBC Chapter 35 requires that common wall and floor/ceiling assemblies within multi-family dwellings comply with minimum standards for the transmission of airborne sound and structure-borne impact noise.

Individual development projects shall be analyzed on a case by case basis.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
HS-8 The City shall develop and employ procedures to monitor compliance with noise mitigation standards after projects are completed.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XVIII. Utilities and Service Systems
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the
relocation or
construction of new or
expanded water,
wastewater treatment
or stormwater drainage,
electric power, natural
gas, or
telecommunications
facilities, the
construction or
relocation of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
Significant
and
Unavoidable
No No No NR-2, PS-1,
PS-2, PS-6,
PS-7, PS-14,
PS-15, AR-1,
AR-2, AR-6,
HS-6, HS-10
b) Have sufficient water
supplies available to
serve the project and
reasonably foreseeable
future development
during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No NR-2, PS-1,
PS-2, PS-6,
PS-7, AR-1,
AR-2, HS-6,
c) Result in a
determination by the
wastewater treatment
provider which serves
or may serve the project
that it has adequate
capacity to serve the
project’s projected
demand in addition to
the provider’s existing
commitments?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No PS-14, PS15, AR-6,
and HS-10
d) Generate solid waste in
excess of State or local
standards, or in excess
of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the
attainment of solid
waste reduction goals?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No None

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
e) Comply with federal,
State, and local
management and
reduction statutes and
regulations related to
solid waste?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. Expansion of the City to the levels outlined would generate the need for new infrastructure in all of the outlined categories. Impacts were concluded to be significant and unavoidable.

The Master Plan would contribute toward the need for new utility system infrastructure, but not to a level beyond that already considered in the EIR. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
b) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would increase demand for water, requiring additional water supplies beyond what was available to the City, would require the extension of water conveyance infrastructure, and could create one or more “cones of depression” beneath City wells, all deemed to be significant and unavoidable impacts.

The Master Plan would contribute toward the need for water supplies, but not to a level above what was considered by the EIR. As such, the proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
c) The EIR found that buildout of General Plan would substantially increase wastewater flows, requiring additional treatment plant capacity above the current waste discharge volume permitted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and would require the extension of wastewater collection infrastructure, both determined to be significant and unavoidable impacts.

The Master Plan would contribute toward the need for wastewater infrastructure, but not to a level above that considered in the EIR. Any future development would be reviewed to ensure adequate capacity in the City’s wastewater system. As such, the proposed project would not

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.
d–e) The EIR found that buildout of the General Plan would generate additional solid waste, which in turn would exceed the capacity of the landfill serving the City, assuming the same per capita rate of solid waste generation. Based on current assumptions, the current landfill would reach its capacity around 2039. The EIR concluded that this impact would be significant and unavoidable.

As of 2019, the Fink Road Landfill is permitted for 13.3 million cubic yards and has 5.2 million cubic yards of remaining capacity. The facility’s closure date is listed as 2055, at the current rate of solid waste generation. Recent legislation has aimed at diverting solid waste from landfills, which is partially proposed to extend the life of landfills. While no development is considered at this time, future development has the potential to generate additional waste. However, waste generation levels are not anticipated to exceed what is contemplated with buildout of the existing land use designations. As such, the Master Plan would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR.

Mitigation Measures
NR-2 The Within 24 months of adoption of the General Plan, the City shall prepare and adopt a comprehensive water conservation plan, which includes but is not limited to, the following:
h. Landscape watering timing restrictions;
i. Requirements for water-efficient irrigation equipment for all new private and public development;
j. Enforcement strategies for water waste;
k. Recommendations for water-efficient landscape ordinances; l. Evaluation of and recommendations for water conservation pricing (such as a tiered rates for water users) to encourage efficient use;
m. Strategies for providing individualized water audits for large accounts to identify conservation opportunities;
n. Requirements for water efficiency training and certification for irrigation designers, installers, and property managers operating within the City.

The City has adopted a Water Master Plan. This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

PS-1 The City shall review and periodically update the City’s Water Master Plan and Urban Water Management Plan consistent with the land use patterns and densities/intensities specified in the General Plan.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

PS-2 The City shall develop and implement a water pipeline replacement and water meter replacement program.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

PS-6 New development shall prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) designed to reduce potential impacts to surface water quality through the

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
construction and life of the project whether or not the development site is over one acre. The SWPPP shall include practices to minimize the contact of construction materials, equipment, and maintenance supplies (e.g., fuels, lubricants, paints, solvents, adhesives) with storm water.

The SWPPP shall specify properly designed centralized storage areas that keep these materials out of the rain.

The SWPPP shall specify a monitoring program to be implemented by the construction site supervisor and must include both dry and wet weather inspections. In addition, in accordance with State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2001-046 monitoring would be required during the construction period for pollutants that may be present in the runoff that are “not visually detectable in runoff.”
BMPs designed to reduce erosion of exposed soil may include, but are not limited to, soil stabilization controls, watering for dust control, perimeter silt fences, placement of hay bales, and sediment basins.

All development projects are subject to SWPPP requirements.

PS-7 The City shall require the preparation of Project Stormwater Management Plans (SMP) to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer for development projects as required by State law.

The SMP shall provide operations and maintenance guidelines for all of the BMPs identified in the SMP, include measures designed to mitigate potential water quality degradation of runoff from all portions of the completed development (including roof and sidewalk runoff), and clearly identify the funding sources for the required ongoing maintenance. The project sponsor or the consultant retained by the sponsor to prepare the SMP shall thoroughly review and comply with the requirements of the most current municipal Phase II General Permit for storm water discharges (Order No. 2003-0005-DWQ). In general, passive, low-maintenance BMPs are preferred.

All development is subject to this requirement.

PS-14 The City shall implement the improvements recommended by the 2010 Wastewater Master Plan as determined by the City Council.

This mitigation measure does not apply to the project.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
PS-15 The City will prepare, adopt and implement a program for development of a secure, reliable, affordable long-term secondary water supply. Such a program shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following:
a. The development of multiple sources of water, including, but not limited to:
i. Recycled water;
ii. Surface water;
iii. Conservation;
b. Water conservation measures, including but not limited, the following:
i. Best Management Practices as recommended by the Department of Water Resources;
ii. Conservation strategies necessary to ensure compliance with the per capita water demand reduction requirements of State law;
iii. The installation of non-potable water supply infrastructure in all new expansion areas;
c. Groundwater management, including:
i. Participation in regional groundwater management efforts; ii. The enhancement of groundwater recharge to increase groundwater supplies, ensure the protection of water quality and reliability, and to minimize impacts to other groundwater users;
iii. The conjunctive management of water resources;
This mitigation measure does not apply to the project.

AR-1 Ensure that development projects are submitted to the District for CEQA comments and review of air quality analysis.

Development projects are subject to this mitigation measure.

AR-2 Train staff planners preparing CEQA documents on how to use the Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts guidance manual.

This mitigation measure does not apply to the project.

This mitigation measure does not apply to this project.

HS-10 The City shall require the following as a condition of project approval to mitigate the adverse noise effects of construction-related activities:
• Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, with no construction on Sundays or federal and state holidays; minor construction equipment servicing, and maintenance will be exempted from this restriction. • During construction, mufflers shall be provided for all heavy construction equipment and all stationary noise sources in accordance with the manufacturers’ recommendations.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
• Stationary noise sources and staging areas shall be located as far as is feasible from existing residences, or contractors shall be required to provide additional noisereducing engine enclosures (with the goal of achieving approximately 10 dBA of reduction compared to uncontrolled engines).
• Air compressors and pneumatic equipment shall be equipped with mufflers, and impact tools shall be equipped with shrouds or shields. • If for construction purposes, locating stationary construction equipment near existing residential uses is required, an eight-foot-tall sound rated fence shall be erected between the equipment and the sensitive receptor. The fence shall be located as close to the equipment as is feasible.
• Construction vehicle access routes shall be designed to minimize the impact on existing residences and occupied hospital facilities.
• A “construction liaison” shall be designated to ensure coordination between construction staff and neighbors to minimize disruptions due to construction noise.

Development projects are subject to this mitigation measure.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XIX. Wildfire
If located in or near State Responsibility Areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an
adopted emergency
response plan or
emergency evacuation
plan?
N/A No No No None
b) Due to slope, prevailing
winds, and other
factors, exacerbate
wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a
wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
N/A No No No None
c) Require the installation
or maintenance of
associated
infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water
sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or
that may result in
temporary or ongoing
impacts to the
environment?
N/A No No No None
d) Expose people or
structures to significant
risks, including
downslope or
downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of
runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage
changes?
N/A No No No None

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Discussion
a–d) The EIR did not evaluate wildfire impacts. The Master Plan proposed projects would not be located in an area susceptible to wildfire and, thus, would not require the construction of roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities for the purpose of fighting fires.

Impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XX. Mandatory Findings of Significance
Would the project:
a) Does the project have
the potential to
substantially degrade
the quality of the
environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife
population to drop
below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or
animal community,
substantially reduce the
number or restrict the
range of a rare or
endangered plant or
animal, or eliminate
important examples of
the major periods of
California history or
prehistory?
Less than
significant
impact with
mitigation
No No No NR-12
b) Does the project have
impacts that are
individually limited, but
cumulatively
considerable?
(“Cumulatively
considerable” means
that the incremental
effects of a project are
considerable when
viewed in connection
with the effects of past
projects, the effects of
other current projects,
and the effects of
probable future
projects)?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No None

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Initial Study/Addendum
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
EIR
Do the Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
c) Does the project have
environmental effects,
which will cause
substantial adverse
effects on human
beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) As discussed in the Biological Resources section, the EIR found that buildout of the General Plan may result in potentially significant impacts to several special-status species, including Swainson’s hawk, San Joaquin kit fox, western burrowing owl, western pond turtle, and nesting birds. The EIR set forth NR-12 that require pre-construction surveys, in locations that may adversely affect special status species. The EIR concluded that impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

The Master Plan does not include any development at this time. New projects do have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, but no new or additional impacts are anticipated beyond what was addressed by the EIR. Mitigation Measures would be applied as appropriate. The proposed project would not introduce new environmental impacts or create more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the EIR. b) Cumulatively considerable impacts have been addressed in the Air Quality, Biological Resources, Hydrology and Water Quality, Population and Housing, and Noise sections.

As discussed, the Master Plan would not result in new or more severe impacts than previously disclosed in the EIR. As such, no new or more severe cumulative impacts would occur. c) Impacts have been addressed in previous sections.

As discussed, the Master Plan would not result in new or more severe impacts than previously disclosed in the EIR. As such, no new or more severe substantial adverse impacts on human beings would occur.

Mitigation Measures
Refer to the Biological Resources section.

Conclusion
The conclusions from the EIR remain unchanged.

8.2.b
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Parks_MP_Addendum (1) (Approve the CEQA Addendum to the 2010 General Plan EIR for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Jeffrey Frye, Interim Fire Chief
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO: 9.1
SUBJECT: Authorize Staff to abate Public Nuisance, by removing Weeds, Dirt, Rubbish, and/or Rank Growth as pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 243 and Ordinance No.704, as defined in Chapter 6.16 of the Patterson Municipal Code. Authorize Staff to begin the bid process utilizing licensed contractors (Resolution No. 2023-53 Clean - Up Process).

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Authorize Staff to abate Public Nuisance, by removing Weeds, Dirt, Rubbish, and/or Rank Growth as pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 243 and Ordinance No.704, as defined in Chapter 6.16 of the Patterson Municipal Code. Authorize Staff to begin the bid process utilizing licensed contractors (Resolution No. 2023-53 Clean - Up Process).

BACKGROUND
The abatement of Weeds, Dirt, Rubbish and/or Rank Growth is a process the City of Patterson Fire Department conducts annually, per Ordinance, in an effort to reduce the aforementioned which may endanger or injure, or be detrimental to, or which cause substantial diminution in the value of neighboring property or endanger or injure the welfare of the residents in the vicinity of such property, or which may become a fire hazard.

This process is conducted year-round, with greater emphasis placed on abating such nuisances between May and October, where hotter, dryer conditions create a greater fire danger and potential for ignition of said nuisances.

ANALYSIS

9.1 Packet Pg. 427
Based on weed abatement surveys and or inspections, formal notices have been issued for the identified properties and or parcels within City limits (see Exhibit “A”) in accordance with the City of Patterson Municipal Code, Chapter 6.16.050, which states:

6.16.050 Service of notice.

Such notices shall be given in the manner set forth in this section:

The director, or such other official as may be designated by the city council, shall cause a notice or notices to be mailed by United States mail, to the owner of the subject property as shown upon any city record, or upon the last equalized assessment roll or at his last known address, whichever he shall determine to be the best means of serving notice upon the actual owner.

Additionally, if the subject property address and the subject property owner’s address are different, the director or other designated official shall cause a notice or notices to be mailed by United States mail to the property address. The failure of the owner to receive such notice shall not affect the power of the city or of its officers or employees to proceed as provided in this chapter.

Such notice shall be mailed not less than ten days prior to the date set for a hearing upon objections as provided in Section 6.16.060 of this chapter. (Ord. 704 § 1 (part), 2008: Ord. 243 § 5, 1974).

A revised and updated list will be provided at the City Council Meeting.

Staff is requesting approval from the City Council for the abatement of weeds and or rank growth to reduce and or eliminate potential fire hazards. Once approved, Staff will obtain bids from licensed contractors for the removal and proceed with award of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder and bill costs occurred to the property owners in accordance with Patterson Municipal Code, Chapter 6.16.190.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended action would not directly result in an impact to the City’s funds, with the exception of staff time spent on surveying the properties. All costs incurred will be recouped by the City as per the Patterson Municipal Code, Chapter 6.16.190:

6.16.190 Assessment of costs against property-Lien.

The cost of abatement upon, or in front or rear, of each lot or parcel of land shall constitute a special assessment against that lot or parcel. After such assessment has been made and confirmed, it shall constitute a lien upon such lot or parcel for the amount of such assessment, until paid. (Ord. 704 § 1 (part), 2008: Ord. 243 § 16, 1974. Formerly 6.16.180).

9.1 Packet Pg. 428
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-53

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON,

DECLARING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE UNDER
ORDINANCE NOS. 243 AND 704
WHEREAS, the Fire Chief of the City of Patterson has reported weeds, rubbish, dirt, rank growth and/or mistletoe located and existing on properties in the City of Patterson in violation of Ordinance Nos. 243 and 704 of the City of Patterson, a description of said properties being hereto attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Chief of the City of Patterson caused Notice to be mailed to the owner(s) of subject properties as in said ordinance provided, said notice giving notice to abate said nuisance and setting a time and place for hearing objections to the proposed abatement; and WHEREAS, said hearing, public comment/action item was held on the 7 th day of November
2023 as in said Notice(s) provided; and
WHEREAS, no objections to the proposed abatement were received at said hearing.

WHEREAS, the City of Patterson has determined and certifies that the charges are either exempt from or in compliance with all the provisions of Proposition 218, which was passed by the voters in November 1996. The City of Patterson has further determined the charges are in compliance with all laws pertaining to the levy of such charges.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Patterson that said City Council finds that a condition exists with regard to the properties in said City which is dangerous to life, limb and property, and to the public health, safety, morals in that weeds, rubbish, dirt, rank growth and/or mistletoe are growing, located, and existing upon said properties in violation of Ordinance Nos. 243 and 704 of the City of Patterson, which endanger and may injure neighboring properties and endangers and may injure the welfare of residents in the vicinity of said properties, and which is a hazard; that of said properties hereto attached as Exhibit A.

The foregoing resolution was passed by the City Council at a special meeting held on the 7 th
day of November 2023, by , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-53 Weed Abatement (Clean-Up Process) (Resolution No. 2023-53 Clean-Up Process Weed Abatemnet October 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
seconded by , and the resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

EXCUSED:

APPROVED:
_________________________________________
Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct, and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a special meeting held on the 7
th day of November 2023, and I further certify that
said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.

DATE:
________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Patterson

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-53 Weed Abatement (Clean-Up Process) (Resolution No. 2023-53 Clean-Up Process Weed Abatemnet October Exhibit A

SITE APN DATE NOTIFIED
1 1461 Mendocino Creek, Patterson, CA 95363 021-064-008 10/18/2023 2 1444 Mendocino Creek, Patterson, CA 95363 021-064-046 10/18/2023 3 300 N. Salado, Patterson, CA 95363 131-021-040 10/18/2023 4 K Patterson, CA 95363 131-011-024 10/18/2023

SITE APN DATE NOTIFIED
1 1461 Mendocino Creek, Patterson, CA 95363 021-064-008 10/18/2023

SITE APN DATE NOTIFIED
2 1444 Mendocino Creek, Patterson, CA 95363 021-064-046 10/18/2023

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Exhibit A (Resolution No. 2023-53 Clean-Up Process Weed Abatemnet October 2023)

SITE APN DATE NOTIFIED
3 300 N. Salado, Patterson, CA 95363 131-021-040 10/18/2023

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Exhibit A (Resolution No. 2023-53 Clean-Up Process Weed Abatemnet October 2023)

SITE APN DATE NOTIFIED
4 K Patterson, CA 95363 131-011-024 10/18/2023

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Exhibit A (Resolution No. 2023-53 Clean-Up Process Weed Abatemnet October 2023) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Bryan Stice, Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO: 10.1
SUBJECT: Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, A Resolution of the City of Patterson Calling for a Special Mail Ballot Election on April 9, 2024 to Confirm the Zacharias-Baldwin Master Plan Reorganization, Requesting Election Services from Stanislaus County, and Authorizing the Filing of Written Arguments.

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, A Resolution of the City of Patterson Calling for a Special Mail Ballot Election on April 9, 2024 to Confirm the Zacharias-Baldwin Master Plan Reorganization, Requesting Election Services from Stanislaus County, and Authorizing the Filing of Written Arguments.

BACKGROUND
In August 2022, the City of Patterson adopted the Zacharias and Baldwin Ranch Master Plans, which provide a comprehensive plan for the development of approximately 1,296 acres located north of the City and an additional 66 acres located south of the City’s Corporation Yard. In November 2022, the City filed a proposal with the Stanislaus County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the areas outlined in the master plans.

On July 26, 2023, Stanislaus LAFCO approved the City’s reorganization proposal, subject to certain terms and conditions. The required protest proceeding was held on September 20, 2023.

The protest hearing failed to yield the necessary level of support to confirm the City’s reorganization proposal.

ANALYSIS

10.1 Packet Pg. 434
As a result of the above referenced protest hearing, the City’s reorganization proposal is subject to an election of the registered voters in the territory proposed for annexation. The attached Resolution calls for the necessary election and requests election services from the Stanislaus County Registrar of Voters for the special mail ballot election on April 9, 2024 as follows:

1. The City must call for an election to confirm the Zacharias-Baldwin Master Plan Reorganization.

When LAFCO approves an inhabited annexation proposal, LAFCO must conduct a protest proceeding. The results of the protest hearing may terminate or confirm the proposal or may subject the proposal to an election of the registered voters in the affected territory.

The LAFCO Executive Officer conducted the required protest hearing on September 20, 2023.

There are 40 registered voters in the territory proposed for annexation. The Executive Officer received 19 verified written protests from registered voters. The number of written protests was neither sufficient to terminate, nor confirm, the proposed reorganization. The reorganization, therefore, must be confirmed in an election by the registered voters in the affected territory.

On October 4, 2023, the Executive Officer directed the City to call for the necessary election.

The City has forty-five (45) days from the date it receives the LAFCO order to approve a resolution calling for the election.

1. The Resolution proposes a special mail ballot election on April 9, 2024.

The election to confirm the reorganization is a special local election. The City may include the measure on the November 5, 2024 general election ballot or may conduct the election wholly by mail ballot on April 9, 2024. The attached Resolution calls for a special mail ballot election on April 9, 2024. This means the deadline for the registered voters in the affected territory to submit their mail ballots will be April 9, 2024. A majority of the votes cast at the special mail ballot election would confirm the Zacharias-Baldwin Ranch Master Plan Reorganization.

1. The Resolution requests election services from the Stanislaus County Registrar of Voters.

The attached Resolution requests election services from the Stanislaus County Registrar of Voters. The County Registrar will provide ballots and canvass returns. The City is required to pay for the costs of conducting the election.

1. Directions for Submitting Written and Rebuttal Arguments are Forthcoming.

Members of the City Council, as well as registered voters or citizen associations within the affected territory may file written arguments in favor or against the reorganization for inclusion in the voter information pamphlet. Authors of written arguments may also file rebuttal arguments after receiving an opportunity to view the arguments in opposition. Directions and deadlines for submission of written and rebuttal arguments are forthcoming and will be provided once the election calendar becomes more certain. The Resolution does authorize the formation of a subcommittee to draft a written argument in favor of the reorganization.

10.1 Packet Pg. 435

FISCAL IMPACT
The City is responsible for the costs of the election, but the costs will be passed on to the developer groups supporting the reorganization.

10.1 Packet Pg. 436
{CW133833.4}
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-54

A RESOLUTION OF THE PATTERSON CITY COUNCIL
CALLING FOR A SPECIAL MAIL BALLOT ELECTION ON APRIL 9, 2024

TO CONFIRM THE ZACHARIAS-BALDWIN MASTER PLAN

REORGANIZATION TO THE CITY OF PATTERSON,

REQUESTING ELECTION SERVICES FROM STANISLAUS COUNTY,

AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF WRITTEN ARGUMENTS
WHEREAS, on August 16, 2022, the Patterson City Council (“City Council”) authorized City Staff to file a proposal with the Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission (“LAFCO”) to annex approximately 1,296 acres north of City limits and 66 acres south of City limits (“Affected Territory”); and
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2023, LAFCO adopted LAFCO Resolution No. 2023-08, (attached hereto as Exhibit A) approving the Zacharias-Baldwin Ranch Master Plan Reorganization subject to certain terms and conditions (the “Reorganization Proposal”), and directing the LAFCO Executive Officer to complete the required protest proceedings pursuant to Government Code Section 57000 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2023, the LAFCO Executive Officer conducted the protest hearing of the qualified voters residing in the Affected Territory. The LAFCO Executive Officer determined that the written protests received were submitted by at least 25% but less than 50% of the registered voters in the Affected Territory; and
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2023, LAFCO adopted LAFCO Conducting Authority Resolution No. 01-2023 (attached hereto as Exhibit B), ordering the Reorganization Proposal to be subject to confirmation by the registered voters residing in the Affected Territory; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 2023, LAFCO notified the City that the Reorganization Proposal is subject to an election by the registered voters residing in the Affected Territory (attached hereto as Exhibit C); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 57000(d), the City must call for the necessary election within forty-five (45) days from the date LAFCO notifies the City that an election must be held; and
WHEREAS, the necessary election must be conducted pursuant to Chapter 6 of Part 4 of the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000; and WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to call for an election, as ordered by LAFCO, to determine if the Reorganization Proposal shall be confirmed.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby call, provide for, and give notice of the election as follows:

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-54_Election_for_Zacharias_Annexation_final__CW133833-4xDCB25_ (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, {CW133833.4}

1. Special Mail Ballot Election on April 9, 2024. The City Council hereby calls and gives notice of a special election of the qualified voters in the Affected Territory. The special election shall be held and conducted wholly by mail ballot. The date for the special mail ballot election shall be April 9, 2024.

2. Elections Official. The City Clerk is hereby designated as the Elections Official for the election, pursuant to Government Code section 57000, subdivision (d). The City Clerk is hereby authorized to take all actions as may be necessary to conduct the election.

3. Request for Election Services from Stanislaus County. The City Council hereby requests that Stanislaus County provide election services for the special mail ballot election on behalf of the City, including but not limited to, preparing and mailing ballots, and canvassing of returns. The City shall be responsible for the costs of election, pursuant to Government Code section 57150.

4. Qualified Voters. The qualified voters for the special mail ballot election shall be the registered voters residing within the Affected Territory, as ordered by LAFCO Conducting Authority Resolution No. 01-2023. Ballots shall be sent to the active and inactive registered voters residing within the Affected Territory.

5. Notice for the Special Mailed Ballot Election. The City Clerk shall give notice of the special mail ballot election in the time, form and manner provided by law.

6. Ballot Measure Question. The question to be submitted on the ballot shall be in substantially the following form, as ordered by LAFCO Conducting Authority Resolution No. 01-2023:

Shall the order be confirmed that
was adopted on July 26, 2023, by
the Stanislaus Local Agency
Formation Commission ordering a
reorganization consisting of
annexation to the City of Patterson
and detachment from the West
Stanislaus Fire Protection District,
West Stanislaus Irrigation District,
Patterson Irrigation District, and
Del Puerto Water District, subject
to the terms and conditions
specified in the order?
YES
NO

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-54_Election_for_Zacharias_Annexation_final__CW133833-4xDCB25_ (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, {CW133833.4}

7. Majority of Votes Cast Confirms the Reorganization Proposal. The Reorganization Proposal shall only pass if a majority of the votes cast at the election are in favor of the Reorganization Proposal, pursuant to Government Code section 57176. If the majority of the votes cast are in favor of the Zacharias-Baldwin Master Plan Reorganization, then the Zacharias-Baldwin Master Plan Reorganization shall be confirmed and ordered, and a Certificate of Completion shall be filed in the manner stated in Government Code section 57000 et. seq., upon satisfaction of the terms and conditions set forth in LAFCO Resolution No. 2023-08.

8. Subcommittee for Written Arguments. The City Council hereby authorizes a two (2) member subcommittee to prepare and file a written argument in favor of the Reorganization Proposal, in accordance with Government Code Section 57145. The subcommittee shall also be authorized to prepare and file a rebuttal argument to the opposing written argument.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Patterson City Council at a meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of November, 2023, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

EXCUSED:

APPROVED:

Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:

Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-54_Election_for_Zacharias_Annexation_final__CW133833-4xDCB25_ (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, {CW133833.4}
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of November 2023, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.

DATED:

City Clerk of the City of Patterson

EXHIBIT A

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-54_Election_for_Zacharias_Annexation_final__CW133833-4xDCB25_ (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, {CW133833.4}
LAFCO Resolution No. 2023-08

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-54_Election_for_Zacharias_Annexation_final__CW133833-4xDCB25_ (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, {CW133833.4}

EXHIBIT B
LAFCO Conducting Authority Resolution No. 01-2023

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-54_Election_for_Zacharias_Annexation_final__CW133833-4xDCB25_ (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, {CW133833.4}

EXHIBIT C
LAFCO Notification of Election to City of Patterson

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-54_Election_for_Zacharias_Annexation_final__CW133833-4xDCB25_ (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54,

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Election_Resolution_Exhibit_A (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, calling forr a Special Mail Ballot)

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Election_Resolution_Exhibit_A (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, calling forr a Special Mail Ballot)

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Election_Resolution_Exhibit_A (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, calling forr a Special Mail Ballot)

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Election_Resolution_Exhibit_A (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, calling forr a Special Mail Ballot)

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Election_Resolution_Exhibit_A (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, calling forr a Special Mail Ballot)

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Election_Resolution_Exhibit_A (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, calling forr a Special Mail Ballot)

10.1.c
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Election_Resolution_Exhibit_B (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, calling forr a Special Mail Ballot)

10.1.c
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Election_Resolution_Exhibit_B (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, calling forr a Special Mail Ballot)

10.1.d
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Election_Resolution_Exhibit_C (Approve Resolution No. 2023-54, calling forr a Special Mail Ballot) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Ken Irwin, City Manager
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO: 11.A.1
SUBJECT: Motion to Reappoint Peter P. La Torre Jr. MD to the Stanislaus County Measure L Citizens Oversight Committee for the Term 2023 - 2026.

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Reappoint Peter P. La Torre Jr. MD to the Stanislaus County Measure L Citizens Oversight Committee for the Term 2023 - 2026.

BACKGROUND
Measure L is the Transportation Ordinance and Expenditure Plan approved by Stanislaus County Voters on November 8, 2016. The measure raises the sales tax in Stanislaus County by one-half for a total period of 25 years to improve our local streets and roads, improve connectivity and reduce congestion. This money is administered by the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) and pays for specific voter-approved transportation projects for local streets and road improvements and regional projects and transit programs specified in the Plan.

Measure L calls for an independent Citizens Oversight Committee to oversee compliance with the Ordinance as specified in the Transportation Ordinance and plan.

Measure L Citizens Oversight Committee members represent each of StanCOG's member agencies.

Dr. La Torre has served on the committee since 2017. He has demonstrated interest and has a history of participating in community activities and government policy making, therefore staff recommends and supports the City Council in their appointment of Dr. Peter La Torre Jr. as the City of Patterson's representative on the Stanislaus County Citizens Oversight Committee for Measure L.

11.A.1
Packet Pg. 453

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.

11.A.1
Packet Pg. 454

Patterson City CouncilNovember 7, 2023

Patterson City Council
November 7, 2023