Pico Rivera City Council
January 24, 2023

 Countable Driveway(s) – Driveways must be serving parking lots for the use of the site and not also serving parking lots for other land uses in the surrounding area.  Successful Development – The development should be mature, be located in a mature environment, and appear to be economically healthy.
 Permission of Property Owners/Managers – Permission was obtained in order to survey a site.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRIP GENERATION AND PARKING
Data Collection
Twenty-four hour driveway counts and overnight parking sweeps were conducted at a total of 42 affordable housing sites within the City of Los Angeles (35 sites counted in May-June 2016 and seven additional sites counted in November 2016). The affordable housing study locations were identified in consultation with the City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning and the City of Los Angeles Housing+Community Investment Department. The sites were categorized according to two criteria considered to influence the level of vehicle ownership and tripmaking but also considered to be available and applicable to future projects (i.e., measureable and able to be determined using a readily available data source): proximity to transit and affordable housing type:
 Proximity to Transit – The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has defined “Transit Priority Areas” (TPAs) as the area within ½ mile of an existing major transit stop, and defines a major transit stop as either a rail station or an intersection of 2 or more major bus routes with peak service frequencies of 15 minutes or less. The transit priority area defined by SCAG applies a ½ mile radial from the station or intersection. For this study, a ½ mile walkshed along the transportation network was used in lieu of the ½ mile radius.

Additionally, stations for the Metro Orange Line and Silver Line Busways were not included in the SCAG definition but were added as part of the rail stations. These busways provide peak hour service less than 15 minutes and operate in dedicated rights-of-way. Study locations were defined as either inside or outside a transit priority area. Twenty of the study locations were within a TPA and 22 were outside of a TPA.  Housing Type – Affordable housing type was categorized as serving families, seniors, special needs, or permanent supportive. Family affordable housing offers affordable dwelling units designed for households with children. Senior affordable housing provides affordable dwelling units designed for mature residents. The category of special needs housing includes facilities serving a variety of populations, including foster youth, disabled, mentally ill, and HIV/AIDs. Permanent supportive housing provides long-term housing with supportive services designed to enable homeless persons and individuals/families at risk of homelessness to ensure that they remain housed and live as independently as possible.

Fourteen of the study sites were designated as family housing, thirteen were senior, eight were special needs, and seven were permanent supportive. Each of these categories were divided roughly equally between sites within a TPA and sites outside of a TPA.

Claire Bowin & David Somers
April 20, 2017

Retail job density was also considered as a possible variable influencing tripmaking but, based on exploratory data analysis and discussions with LADOT, the final trip generation analysis was disaggregated based on proximity to transit and housing type only.

Table 1 presents the list of properties included in the analysis. Table 2 shows the aggregated vehicle trip generation results based on proximity to transit and housing type. Table 2 also shows relevant trip generation rates from ITE’s Trip Generation, 9th Edition, for comparison. Table 3 shows the aggregated parking demand and utilization results based on proximity to transit and housing type.

For comparison, Table 3 also shows relevant parking requirements from the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC).

Property managers for 36 of the 42 surveyed sites provided information regarding selected characteristics of the sites. All of the respondents stated that they provide parking but do not charge residents for parking on-site. None of the respondents provide partially or fully-subsidized transit passes to residents, none provide car-share services, and one provides a shuttle to grocery stores.

Results
Reviewing Table 2, the following observations can be made:
 The empirical vehicle trip generation rates across the affordable housing survey sites are higher for the affordable family units relative to the senior, special needs, and permanent supportive affordable units.
 The empirical trip generation rates are generally lower for units located within a TPA than for units located outside of a TPA.
 The empirical trip generation rates averaged across all 42 of the affordable housing survey sites are lower than the ITE trip rates for standard apartments for all three time periods (daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour). This holds true as well for almost all of the disaggregated subcategories (the sole exception being affordable family units outside of a TPA during the AM peak hour).
 Affordable family units both inside and outside of a TPA are the only categories with empirical rates higher than the ITE high-rise apartment rates (an ITE category which primarily consists of buildings within urban areas).
 The empirical rates for senior, special needs, and permanent supportive affordable housing are far lower than both the ITE apartment and ITE high-rise apartment rates.  The empirical rates for the senior affordable housing are lower than ITE rates for senior adult housing.

Reviewing Table 3, the following observations can be made:
 The empirical parking demand ratios are higher for the affordable family units relative to the senior, special needs, and permanent supportive units.

Claire Bowin & David Somers
April 20, 2017

 The empirical parking demand ratios for each of the subcategorizations of the affordable housing survey sites (by affordable housing type and by transit proximity) are lower than the LAMC parking requirement for apartments.
 The empirical parking demand ratios for family affordable housing range from 0.82 to 0.85 spaces per unit and are lower than the parking requirements under the LAMC Affordable Housing Density Bonus Option 2 (LAMC 12.22A.25(d)(2)) for restricted affordable units (1 space per unit).
 The empirical parking demand ratios for senior, special needs, and permanent supportive affordable housing range from 0.20 to 0.48 spaces per unit and are lower than the parking requirements under the LAMC Affordable Housing Density Bonus Option 2 (LAMC

12.22A.25(d)(2)) for units restricted to low or very low income senior citizen or disabled (0.5 spaces per unit).
 The empirical parking demand ratios are lower for units located within a TPA than for units located outside of a TPA for the senior, special need, and permanent supportive units but not for the family units.

SOURCES
Trip Generation, 9th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012.

Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2014.

Los Angeles Municipal Code.

TABLE 1
Affordable Housing Trip Generation and Parking Utilization Survey Locations Count Name Address Transit Priority Area Housing Type
1 Barnsdall Court 1632 N Normandie Ave, Hollywood, CA 90027 Inside Family 2 Parkside Apartments 900 S Grand Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90015 Inside Family 3 El Dorado Family Apts 12129 N El Dorado Ave, Los Angeles, CA 91342 Inside Family 4 Union Point 420 Union Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Inside Family 5 Coronita Family 204 S Lucas Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90026 Inside Family 6 New Venice 1A 535 Santa Clara Ave, Venice, CA 90291 Inside Family 7 New Venice 2C 1002 5th Ave, Venice, CA 90291 Inside Family 8 Sichel Family Apts 1805 Sichel St, Los Angeles, CA 90031 Inside Family 9 Bonnie Brae Village 208 S Bonnie Brae St, Los Angeles, CA 90057 Inside Permanent Supportive 10 Gower Street Apts 1140 N Gower St, Los Angeles, CA 90038 Inside Permanent Supportive 11 The Villas At Gower 1726 N Gower St, Hollywood, CA 90028 Inside Permanent Supportive 12 NoHo Seniors Villa 5525 Klump Ave, North Hollywood, CA 91601 Inside Seniors 13 Morgan Place Senior Apts 7301 S Crenshaw Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90043 Inside Seniors 14 Figueroa Senior Housing 7621 S Figueroa St, Los Angeles, CA 90044 Inside Seniors 15 Hollenbeck Terrace 610 S Saint Louis St, Los Angeles, CA 90023 Inside Seniors 16 Ward Villas 1177 W Adams Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90007 Inside Seniors 17 Vermont Manzanita 1225 S Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90006 Inside Special Needs 18 New Carver 1624 S Hope St, Los Angeles, CA 90015 Inside Special Needs 19 Charles Cobb Apts 521 S San Pedro St, Los Angeles, CA 90013 Inside Special Needs 20 New Genesis 452 S Main St, Los Angeles, CA 90013 Inside Special Needs 21 Rio Vista Apts 3000 N Verdugo Rd, Los Angeles, CA 90065 Outside Family 22 New Venice 4B 915 7th Ave, Venice, CA 90291 Outside Family 23 Cuatro Vientos 5331 E Huntington Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90032 Outside Family 24 Lorena Terrace 611 South Lorena St, Los Angeles, CA 90023 Outside Family 25 Laurel Village 9700 Laurel Canyon Blvd, Pacoima, CA 91331 Outside Family 26 New Venice 2D 919 5th Ave, Venice, CA 90291 Outside Family 27 Cornerstone Apts 14128 Calvert St, Van Nuys, CA 91401 Outside Permanent Supportive 28 Willis Avenue Apts 14731 W Rayen St, Los Angeles, CA 91402 Outside Permanent Supportive 29 PATH Villas At Del Rey 11734 Courtleigh Dr, CA 90066 Outside Permanent Supportive 30 Winnetka Senior Apts 20750 Sherman Way, Los Angeles CA 91306 Outside Permanent Supportive 31 TELACU Pointe 3100 Fletcher Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90065 Outside Seniors 32 Asturias Senior Apts 9628 Van Nuys Blvd, Panorama City, CA 91402 Outside Seniors 33 Cantabria Senior Apts 9640 N Van Nuys Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 91402 Outside Seniors 34 TELACU Vista 4900 N Via Marisol, Highland Park, CA 90032 Outside Seniors 35 Andalucia Senior Apts 15305 W Lanark St, Los Angeles, CA 91406 Outside Seniors 36 TELACU Las Flores 12793 Mercer St, Pacoima, CA 91331 Outside Seniors 37 Buckingham Sr. Housing 4020 S Buckingham Rd, Los Angeles, CA 90008 Outside Seniors 38 Villa Valley 15950 Sherman Way, Los Angeles, CA 91406 Outside Seniors 39 Allesandro Street Apts 1934 Allesandro St, Los Angeles, CA 90039 Outside Special Needs 40 Innes Heights, Lp 1245 Innes Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90026 Outside Special Needs 41 Woodland Terrace 15532 W Nordhoff St, North Hills, CA 91343 Outside Special Needs 42 Guy Gabaldon Apts 3553 Beswick St, Los Angeles, CA 90023 Outside Special Needs TABLE 2
Vehicle Trip Rates for Affordable Housing Sites in Los Angeles (By Transit Priority Area and Affordable Housing Type)
Counts conducted May, June, and November 2016
TPA Area Affordable Housing Type Bin Sample Size Daily Rate (Trips per DU)
Average AM Peak
Hour Rate
(Trips per DU)
AM Percent
In
AM Percent
Out
Average PM Peak
Hour Rate
(Trips per DU)
PM Percent
In
PM Percent
Out
Inside - 20 2.32 0.26 40% 60% 0.20 56% 44%
Outside - 22 2.48 0.25 46% 54% 0.24 52% 48%
- Family 14 4.16 0.52 38% 62% 0.38 55% 45%
- Seniors 13 1.72 0.12 38% 62% 0.15 52% 48%
- Special Needs 8 1.49 0.17 43% 57% 0.11 54% 46%
- Permanent Supportive 7 1.23 0.08 67% 33% 0.13 53% 47% Inside Family Inside, Family 8 4.16 0.49 37% 63% 0.35 56% 44% Inside Seniors Inside, Seniors 5 1.31 0.13 38% 62% 0.13 47% 53% Inside Special Needs Inside, Special Needs 4 1.00 0.10 30% 70% 0.05 67% 33% Inside Permanent Supportive Inside, Permanent Supportive 3 0.87 0.08 62% 38% 0.09 59% 41% Outside Family Outside, Family 6 4.15 0.55 40% 60% 0.43 55% 45% Outside Seniors Outside, Seniors 8 1.97 0.11 38% 62% 0.17 55% 45% Outside Special Needs Outside, Special Needs 4 1.98 0.24 54% 46% 0.16 44% 56% Outside Permanent Supportive Outside, Permanent Supportive 4 1.50 0.09 71% 29% 0.16 49% 51% ITE for Comparison
ITE Record Number Description Sample Size Daily Rate
(Trips per DU)
Average AM Peak
Hour Rate
(Trips per DU)
AM Percent
In
AM Percent
Out
Average PM Peak
Hour Rate
(Trips per DU)
PM Percent
In
PM Percent
Out
ITE 220 Apartment 78-90 6.65 0.51 20% 80% 0.62 65% 35%
ITE 222 High-Rise Apartment 9-17 4.20 0.30 25% 75% 0.35 61% 39% ITE 252 Senior Adult Housing-Attached 5-10 3.44 0.20 34% 66% 0.25 54% 46% ITE 253 Congregate Care Facility 2-3 2.02 0.06 59% 41% 0.17 55% 45% ITE 255 Continuing Care Retirement Community 4-6 2.40 0.14 65% 35% 0.16 39% 61% TABLE 3
Parking Demand Rates for Affordable Housing Sites in Los Angeles (By Transit Priority Area and Affordable Housing Type)
Surveys conducted May, June, and November 2016
TPA Area Affordable Housing Type Sample Size Parking Demand Per Dwelling Unit Parking Utilization
Inside - 20 0.53 64%
Outside - 22 0.56 63%
- Family 14 0.84 72%
- Seniors 13 0.46 71%
- Special Needs 8 0.32 43%
- Permanent Supportive 7 0.37 56%
Inside Family 8 0.85 74%
Inside Seniors 5 0.44 73%
Inside Special Needs 4 0.20 34%
Inside Permanent Supportive 3 0.29 64%
Outside Family 6 0.82 70%
Outside Seniors 8 0.48 69%
Outside Special Needs 4 0.44 52%
Outside Permanent Supportive 4 0.43 50%
LAMC for Comparison
Parking Requirement per
Unit
Apartments (LAMC 12.21A.4(a))
<3 habitable rooms 1
3 habitable rooms 1.5
>3 habitable rooms 2
Projects with Affordable Housing Density Bonus - Option 1 (applies to all units, not just restricted units) (LAMC 12.22A.25(d)(1)) 0-1 bedroom 1
2-3 bedrooms 2
4 or more bedrooms 2.5
Projects with Affordable Housing Density Bonus - Option 2 (applies to restricted units only) (LAMC 12.22A.25(d)(2)) restricted affordable units 1
restricted to low or very low income senior citizen or disabled 0.5 restricted affordable units in residential hotel 0.25
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4418-1 The Mercury Project

APPENDIX D

COUNT DATA
File Name : Paramount_Washington_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Passenger
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 20 82 35 19 144 4 37 49 10 10 111 32 553
07:15 AM 19 100 49 27 198 9 29 54 8 15 111 43 662
07:30 AM 12 117 54 25 219 7 40 67 8 14 109 31 703
07:45 AM 16 111 34 32 199 6 52 67 12 21 143 73 766
Total 67 410 172 103 760 26 158 237 38 60 474 179 2684
08:00 AM 18 100 24 19 137 6 45 75 15 19 116 42 616
08:15 AM 17 92 31 22 138 8 36 65 17 10 106 42 584
08:30 AM 15 77 24 21 129 12 41 58 8 18 107 30 540
08:45 AM 19 70 28 13 140 8 52 76 9 15 103 30 563
Total 69 339 107 75 544 34 174 274 49 62 432 144 2303
04:00 PM 42 118 27 21 125 32 74 149 27 47 277 63 1002
04:15 PM 33 130 34 27 157 29 67 161 20 50 322 50 1080
04:30 PM 40 119 26 18 165 20 88 165 24 43 320 52 1080
04:45 PM 46 154 29 24 159 19 72 181 37 39 360 59 1179
Total 161 521 116 90 606 100 301 656 108 179 1279 224 4341 05:00 PM 31 136 26 18 151 31 81 173 32 36 326 57 1098
05:15 PM 52 134 39 23 155 22 71 157 27 43 400 59 1182
05:30 PM 48 131 24 30 157 35 75 163 31 50 415 54 1213
05:45 PM 53 141 18 23 135 32 69 130 28 45 370 58 1102
Total 184 542 107 94 598 120 296 623 118 174 1511 228 4595 Grand Total 481 1812 502 362 2508 280 929 1790 313 475 3696 775 13923 Apprch % 17.2 64.8 18 11.5 79.6 8.9 30.6 59 10.3 9.6 74.7 15.7 Total % 3.5 13 3.6 2.6 18 2 6.7 12.9 2.2 3.4 26.5 5.6

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 19 100 49 168 27 198 9 234 29 54 8 91 15 111 43 169 662 07:30 AM 12 117 54 183 25 219 7 251 40 67 8 115 14 109 31 154 703 07:45 AM 16 111 34 161 32 199 6 237 52 67 12 131 21 143 73 237 766 08:00 AM 18 100 24 142 19 137 6 162 45 75 15 135 19 116 42 177 616 Total Volume 65 428 161 654 103 753 28 884 166 263 43 472 69 479 189 737 2747 % App. Total 9.9 65.4 24.6 11.7 85.2 3.2 35.2 55.7 9.1 9.4 65 25.6 PHF .855 .915 .745 .893 .805 .860 .778 .880 .798 .877 .717 .874 .821 .837 .647 .777 .897 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
161
Thru
428
Left
65 Out In Total
360 654 1014
Right
28 Thru
753
Left
103
Out Total In
587 884 1471
Left
166
Thru
263
Right
43 Out In Total
720 472 1192
Left
69 Thru
479
Right
189
Total Out In
1080 737 1817
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Passenger
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 46 154 29 229 24 159 19 202 72 181 37 290 39 360 59 458 1179 05:00 PM 31 136 26 193 18 151 31 200 81 173 32 286 36 326 57 419 1098 05:15 PM 52 134 39 225 23 155 22 200 71 157 27 255 43 400 59 502 1182 05:30 PM 48 131 24 203 30 157 35 222 75 163 31 269 50 415 54 519 1213 Total Volume 177 555 118 850 95 622 107 824 299 674 127 1100 168 1501 229 1898 4672 % App. Total 20.8 65.3 13.9 11.5 75.5 13 27.2 61.3 11.5 8.9 79.1 12.1 PHF .851 .901 .756 .928 .792 .978 .764 .928 .923 .931 .858 .948 .840 .904 .970 .914 .963 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
118
Thru
555
Left
177
Out In Total
949 850 1799
Right
107
Thru
622
Left
95 Out Total In
1805 824 2629
Left
299
Thru
674
Right
127
Out In Total
879 1100 1979
Left
168 1501
Thru Right
229
Total Out In
1039 1898 2937
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Passenger
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Buses
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3
07:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 9
08:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
08:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3
Total 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 9
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
04:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3
Total 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 6
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 6
Grand Total 0 3 2 0 10 0 0 3 1 1 10 0 30
Apprch % 0 60 40 0 100 0 0 75 25 9.1 90.9 0
Total % 0 10 6.7 0 33.3 0 0 10 3.3 3.3 33.3 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3
07:30 AM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2
08:00 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 3
Total Volume 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 4 0 5 10
% App. Total 0 33.3 66.7 0 100 0 0 100 0 20 80 0
PHF .000 .250 .250 .375 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .250 .500 .000 .625 .833 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
2 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
2 3 5
Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out Total In
4 1 5
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Out In Total
1 1 2
Left
1 Thru
4 Right
0 Total Out In
3 5 8
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Buses
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 7
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .500 .000 .500 .583 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
1 1 2
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
0 Out Total In
2 3 5
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Out In Total
1 1 2
Left
0 Thru
2 Right
0 Total Out In
3 2 5
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Buses
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Motorcycles
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
07:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
07:30 AM 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 1 0 9
07:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total 0 2 1 4 0 0 7 2 0 0 1 0 17
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
08:15 AM 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 6
08:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4
08:45 AM 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5
Total 0 3 1 4 0 0 6 2 1 0 0 0 17
04:00 PM 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 7
04:15 PM 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 7
04:30 PM 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 8
04:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 4
Total 3 2 1 3 0 0 9 3 1 1 2 1 26
05:00 PM 0 2 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 8
05:15 PM 0 1 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 9
05:30 PM 1 0 1 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 9
05:45 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 6
Total 1 4 1 6 0 0 14 0 2 0 3 1 32
Grand Total 4 11 4 17 0 0 36 7 4 1 6 2 92
Apprch % 21.1 57.9 21.1 100 0 0 76.6 14.9 8.5 11.1 66.7 22.2 Total % 4.3 12 4.3 18.5 0 0 39.1 7.6 4.3 1.1 6.5 2.2

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 3 2 0 5 0 1 0 1 9
07:45 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
08:15 AM 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 6
Total Volume 0 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 9 3 0 12 0 1 0 1 20
% App. Total 0 66.7 33.3 100 0 0 75 25 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .500 .250 .750 .500 .000 .000 .500 .750 .375 .000 .600 .000 .250 .000 .250 .556 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
1 Thru
2 Left
0 Out In Total
3 3 6
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
4 Out Total In
1 4 5
Left
9 Thru
3 Right
0 Out In Total
6 12 18
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Total Out In
10 1 11
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Motorcycles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 8
05:15 PM 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 3 2 0 1 3 0 1 1 2 9
05:30 PM 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 9
05:45 PM 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 6
Total Volume 1 4 1 6 6 0 0 6 14 0 2 16 0 3 1 4 32
% App. Total 16.7 66.7 16.7 100 0 0 87.5 0 12.5 0 75 25 PHF .250 .500 .250 .750 .500 .000 .000 .500 .700 .000 .500 .800 .000 .750 .250 .500 .889 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
1 Thru
4 Left
1 Out In Total
0 6 6
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
6 Out Total In
6 6 12
Left
14 Thru
0 Right
2 Out In Total
11 16 27
Left
0 Thru
3 Right
1 Total Out In
15 4 19
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Motorcycles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 2 Axle
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washingon Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 6 2 1 3 0 3 2 2 2 3 2 27
07:15 AM 5 6 2 2 5 0 2 2 1 2 7 0 34
07:30 AM 2 4 2 0 10 0 0 5 2 0 6 1 32
07:45 AM 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 28
Total 9 21 7 4 25 1 6 13 6 5 18 6 121
08:00 AM 1 4 2 0 5 1 3 3 4 0 9 3 35
08:15 AM 1 3 1 0 6 2 4 2 3 1 6 2 31
08:30 AM 3 1 0 1 6 0 4 2 2 1 15 4 39
08:45 AM 0 4 0 2 5 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 24
Total 5 12 3 3 22 5 12 9 11 3 32 12 129
04:00 PM 0 5 0 0 5 0 1 2 2 0 3 4 22
04:15 PM 0 2 1 1 3 1 0 7 0 3 7 2 27
04:30 PM 0 4 0 0 6 1 0 4 1 0 7 1 24
04:45 PM 1 5 1 3 3 0 3 0 1 0 4 2 23
Total 1 16 2 4 17 2 4 13 4 3 21 9 96
05:00 PM 1 0 1 0 5 0 0 1 2 0 4 0 14
05:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 3 5 14
05:30 PM 1 2 1 0 2 1 2 3 0 1 11 1 25
05:45 PM 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 10
Total 3 2 4 0 9 1 4 5 5 3 20 7 63
Grand Total 18 51 16 11 73 9 26 40 26 14 91 34 409
Apprch % 21.2 60 18.8 11.8 78.5 9.7 28.3 43.5 28.3 10.1 65.5 24.5 Total % 4.4 12.5 3.9 2.7 17.8 2.2 6.4 9.8 6.4 3.4 22.2 8.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washingon Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM 1 5 1 7 1 7 1 9 1 4 1 6 1 2 3 6 28
08:00 AM 1 4 2 7 0 5 1 6 3 3 4 10 0 9 3 12 35
08:15 AM 1 3 1 5 0 6 2 8 4 2 3 9 1 6 2 9 31
08:30 AM 3 1 0 4 1 6 0 7 4 2 2 8 1 15 4 20 39
Total Volume 6 13 4 23 2 24 4 30 12 11 10 33 3 32 12 47 133 % App. Total 26.1 56.5 17.4 6.7 80 13.3 36.4 33.3 30.3 6.4 68.1 25.5 PHF .500 .650 .500 .821 .500 .857 .500 .833 .750 .688 .625 .825 .750 .533 .750 .588 .853 Rosemead Blvd
Washingon Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
4 Thru
13 Left
6 Out In Total
18 23 41
Right
4 Thru
24 Left
2 Out Total In
48 30 78
Left
12 Thru
11 Right
10 Out In Total
27 33 60
Left
3 Thru
32 Right
12 Total Out In
40 47 87
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM
2 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washingon Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 1 2 2 5 0 3 4 7 22
04:15 PM 0 2 1 3 1 3 1 5 0 7 0 7 3 7 2 12 27
04:30 PM 0 4 0 4 0 6 1 7 0 4 1 5 0 7 1 8 24
04:45 PM 1 5 1 7 3 3 0 6 3 0 1 4 0 4 2 6 23
Total Volume 1 16 2 19 4 17 2 23 4 13 4 21 3 21 9 33 96 % App. Total 5.3 84.2 10.5 17.4 73.9 8.7 19 61.9 19 9.1 63.6 27.3 PHF .250 .800 .500 .679 .333 .708 .500 .821 .333 .464 .500 .750 .250 .750 .563 .688 .889 Rosemead Blvd
Washingon Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
2 Thru
16 Left
1 Out In Total
18 19 37
Right
2 Thru
17 Left
4 Out Total In
26 23 49
Left
4 Thru
13 Right
4 Out In Total
29 21 50
Left
3 Thru
21 Right
9 Total Out In
23 33 56
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
2 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 3 Axle
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 8
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
07:30 AM 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 11
07:45 AM 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 5 2 15
Total 0 3 2 1 7 0 2 4 1 1 12 4 37
08:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 1 5 0 13
08:15 AM 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 5 5 1 18
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 11
08:45 AM 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 9
Total 0 5 3 1 10 0 0 6 0 6 19 1 51
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 2 5 0 14
04:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 9
04:30 PM 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 8
04:45 PM 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 8
Total 0 3 2 0 13 1 2 3 1 2 12 0 39
05:00 PM 0 0 3 1 4 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 12
05:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 6
05:30 PM 1 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
05:45 PM 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 8
Total 2 2 5 2 11 1 0 2 0 5 4 0 34
Grand Total 2 13 12 4 41 2 4 15 2 14 47 5 161
Apprch % 7.4 48.1 44.4 8.5 87.2 4.3 19 71.4 9.5 21.2 71.2 7.6 Total % 1.2 8.1 7.5 2.5 25.5 1.2 2.5 9.3 1.2 8.7 29.2 3.1

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 3 0 1 1 2 0 4 0 4 11
07:45 AM 0 2 1 3 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 3 1 5 2 8 15
08:00 AM 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 1 5 0 6 13
08:15 AM 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 5 5 1 11 18
Total Volume 0 6 3 9 2 7 0 9 1 8 1 10 7 19 3 29 57
% App. Total 0 66.7 33.3 22.2 77.8 0 10 80 10 24.1 65.5 10.3 PHF .000 .750 .750 .750 .500 .875 .000 .750 .250 .667 .250 .833 .350 .950 .375 .659 .792 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
3 Thru
6 Left
0 Out In Total
15 9 24
Right
0 Thru
7 Left
2 Out Total In
20 9 29
Left
1 Thru
8 Right
1 Out In Total
11 10 21
Left
7 Thru
19 Right
3 Total Out In
11 29 40
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
3 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 6 1 0 0 1 2 5 0 7 14
04:15 PM 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 3 0 2 0 2 9
04:30 PM 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 8
04:45 PM 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 8
Total Volume 0 3 2 5 0 13 1 14 2 3 1 6 2 12 0 14 39
% App. Total 0 60 40 0 92.9 7.1 33.3 50 16.7 14.3 85.7 0 PHF .000 .375 .500 .625 .000 .650 .250 .583 .500 .375 .250 .500 .250 .600 .000 .500 .696 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
2 Thru
3 Left
0 Out In Total
6 5 11
Right
1 Thru
13 Left
0 Out Total In
13 14 27
Left
2 Thru
3 Right
1 Out In Total
3 6 9
Left
2 Thru
12 Right
0 Total Out In
17 14 31
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
3 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 4+ Axles
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 3 3 2 12 0 1 0 6 1 9 4 41
07:15 AM 1 1 1 0 13 0 0 2 5 1 16 1 41
07:30 AM 1 2 5 1 7 1 0 1 2 0 10 2 32
07:45 AM 1 2 3 2 14 0 3 0 1 1 14 1 42
Total 3 8 12 5 46 1 4 3 14 3 49 8 156
08:00 AM 0 0 1 2 9 0 2 4 2 0 9 1 30
08:15 AM 1 1 3 0 8 1 3 4 3 0 10 2 36
08:30 AM 1 0 0 1 11 0 0 5 3 2 11 1 35
08:45 AM 3 3 3 1 8 2 2 3 1 5 10 0 41
Total 5 4 7 4 36 3 7 16 9 7 40 4 142
04:00 PM 0 2 1 0 7 0 1 1 2 1 3 2 20
04:15 PM 0 1 2 3 5 0 1 1 1 0 8 0 22
04:30 PM 0 1 1 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 9 2 26
04:45 PM 0 2 2 1 8 0 1 4 0 0 9 1 28
Total 0 6 6 5 26 0 6 7 4 2 29 5 96
05:00 PM 0 1 2 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 7 3 27
05:15 PM 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 7 5 23
05:30 PM 0 2 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 17
05:45 PM 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 5 0 12
Total 0 3 5 1 28 1 1 4 1 4 23 8 79
Grand Total 8 21 30 15 136 5 18 30 28 16 141 25 473
Apprch % 13.6 35.6 50.8 9.6 87.2 3.2 23.7 39.5 36.8 8.8 77.5 13.7 Total % 1.7 4.4 6.3 3.2 28.8 1.1 3.8 6.3 5.9 3.4 29.8 5.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 3 3 6 2 12 0 14 1 0 6 7 1 9 4 14 41
07:15 AM 1 1 1 3 0 13 0 13 0 2 5 7 1 16 1 18 41
07:30 AM 1 2 5 8 1 7 1 9 0 1 2 3 0 10 2 12 32
07:45 AM 1 2 3 6 2 14 0 16 3 0 1 4 1 14 1 16 42
Total Volume 3 8 12 23 5 46 1 52 4 3 14 21 3 49 8 60 156 % App. Total 13 34.8 52.2 9.6 88.5 1.9 19 14.3 66.7 5 81.7 13.3 PHF .750 .667 .600 .719 .625 .821 .250 .813 .333 .375 .583 .750 .750 .766 .500 .833 .929 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
12 Thru
8 Left
3 Out In Total
7 23 30
Right
1 Thru
46 Left
5 Out Total In
66 52 118
Left
4 Thru
3 Right
14 Out In Total
21 21 42
Left
3 Thru
49 Right
8 Total Out In
62 60 122
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
4+ Axles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 1 1 2 1 6 0 7 3 1 1 5 1 9 2 12 26
04:45 PM 0 2 2 4 1 8 0 9 1 4 0 5 0 9 1 10 28
05:00 PM 0 1 2 3 1 8 1 10 1 1 1 3 1 7 3 11 27
05:15 PM 0 0 1 1 0 8 0 8 0 2 0 2 0 7 5 12 23
Total Volume 0 4 6 10 3 30 1 34 5 8 2 15 2 32 11 45 104 % App. Total 0 40 60 8.8 88.2 2.9 33.3 53.3 13.3 4.4 71.1 24.4 PHF .000 .500 .750 .625 .750 .938 .250 .850 .417 .500 .500 .750 .500 .889 .550 .938 .929 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Right
6 Thru
4 Left
0 Out In Total
11 10 21
Right
1 Thru
30 Left
3 Out Total In
34 34 68
Left
5 Thru
8 Right
2 Out In Total
18 15 33
Left
2 Thru
32 Right
11 Total Out In
41 45 86
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
4+ Axles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 7 1 0 10
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 1 2 1 8 1 1 14
08:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 3
08:15 AM 0 3 0 2 0 4 0 2 11
08:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3
08:45 AM 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
Total 0 6 0 3 0 8 0 4 21
04:00 PM 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 9
04:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 5
04:30 PM 0 3 0 8 1 1 0 0 13
04:45 PM 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 4
Total 3 6 1 10 3 5 1 2 31
05:00 PM 1 1 0 2 0 8 0 3 15
05:15 PM 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 7
05:30 PM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
05:45 PM 1 2 0 2 1 2 0 0 8
Total 5 6 1 4 1 11 0 5 33
Grand Total 8 18 3 19 5 32 2 12 99
Apprch % 30.8 69.2 13.6 86.4 13.5 86.5 14.3 85.7
Total % 8.1 18.2 3 19.2 5.1 32.3 2 12.1

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 3
08:15 AM 0 3 3 0 2 2 0 4 4 0 2 2 11
08:30 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3
08:45 AM 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 4
Total Volume 0 6 6 0 3 3 0 8 8 0 4 4 21
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100
PHF .000 .500 .500 .000 .375 .375 .000 .500 .500 .000 .500 .500 .477 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Thru
0 Peds
6 Out In Total
0 6 6
Thru
0 Peds
3 Out Total In
0 3 3
Thru
0 Peds
8 Out In Total
0 8 8
Thru
0 Peds
4 Total Out In
0 4 4
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Paramount_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Paramount Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Paramount Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 3 3 0 8 8 1 1 2 0 0 0 13
04:45 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 4
05:00 PM 1 1 2 0 2 2 0 8 8 0 3 3 15
05:15 PM 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 7
Total Volume 4 7 11 0 10 10 2 11 13 0 5 5 39
% App. Total 36.4 63.6 0 100 15.4 84.6 0 100
PHF .500 .583 .688 .000 .313 .313 .500 .344 .406 .000 .417 .417 .650 Paramount Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Thru
4 Peds
7 Out In Total
2 11 13
Thru
0 Peds
10 Out Total In
0 10 10
Thru
2 Peds
11 Out In Total
4 13 17
Thru
0 Peds
5 Total Out In
0 5 5
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Passenger
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 11 2 5 14 167 2 11 1 6 0 146 1 366
07:15 AM 17 2 2 14 235 1 12 2 6 1 102 8 402
07:30 AM 7 2 1 22 270 3 7 0 16 4 137 2 471
07:45 AM 15 1 6 24 217 2 9 2 11 3 149 7 446
Total 50 7 14 74 889 8 39 5 39 8 534 18 1685
08:00 AM 12 2 3 11 176 4 7 1 15 3 137 4 375
08:15 AM 11 2 1 18 176 8 6 2 5 2 121 4 356
08:30 AM 7 3 4 16 157 8 9 1 9 2 127 5 348
08:45 AM 6 5 4 18 173 8 1 1 15 4 116 6 357
Total 36 12 12 63 682 28 23 5 44 11 501 19 1436
04:00 PM 7 3 2 44 170 11 32 8 36 34 280 12 639
04:15 PM 14 5 5 41 194 11 40 11 33 31 290 15 690
04:30 PM 13 7 4 40 206 13 31 10 39 36 300 19 718
04:45 PM 12 2 2 43 181 12 40 10 32 21 326 18 699
Total 46 17 13 168 751 47 143 39 140 122 1196 64 2746
05:00 PM 18 5 4 33 194 13 36 10 35 24 303 14 689
05:15 PM 22 2 6 45 179 9 30 7 27 24 339 10 700
05:30 PM 18 5 2 33 175 18 36 8 33 15 359 15 717
05:45 PM 20 4 7 38 143 12 49 5 30 16 313 18 655
Total 78 16 19 149 691 52 151 30 125 79 1314 57 2761
Grand Total 210 52 58 454 3013 135 356 79 348 220 3545 158 8628 Apprch % 65.6 16.2 18.1 12.6 83.6 3.7 45.5 10.1 44.4 5.6 90.4 4 Total % 2.4 0.6 0.7 5.3 34.9 1.6 4.1 0.9 4 2.5 41.1 1.8

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 17 2 2 21 14 235 1 250 12 2 6 20 1 102 8 111 402 07:30 AM 7 2 1 10 22 270 3 295 7 0 16 23 4 137 2 143 471 07:45 AM 15 1 6 22 24 217 2 243 9 2 11 22 3 149 7 159 446 08:00 AM 12 2 3 17 11 176 4 191 7 1 15 23 3 137 4 144 375 Total Volume 51 7 12 70 71 898 10 979 35 5 48 88 11 525 21 557 1694 % App. Total 72.9 10 17.1 7.3 91.7 1 39.8 5.7 54.5 2 94.3 3.8 PHF .750 .875 .500 .795 .740 .831 .625 .830 .729 .625 .750 .957 .688 .881 .656 .876 .899 Crossway Dr
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Dr
Right
12 Thru
7 Left
51 Out In Total
26 70 96
Right
10 Thru
898
Left
71 Out Total In
624 979 1603
Left
35 Thru
5 Right
48 Out In Total
99 88 187
Left
11 Thru
525
Right
21 Total Out In
945 557 1502
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Passenger
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 13 7 4 24 40 206 13 259 31 10 39 80 36 300 19 355 718 04:45 PM 12 2 2 16 43 181 12 236 40 10 32 82 21 326 18 365 699 05:00 PM 18 5 4 27 33 194 13 240 36 10 35 81 24 303 14 341 689 05:15 PM 22 2 6 30 45 179 9 233 30 7 27 64 24 339 10 373 700 Total Volume 65 16 16 97 161 760 47 968 137 37 133 307 105 1268 61 1434 2806 % App. Total 67 16.5 16.5 16.6 78.5 4.9 44.6 12.1 43.3 7.3 88.4 4.3 PHF .739 .571 .667 .808 .894 .922 .904 .934 .856 .925 .853 .936 .729 .935 .803 .961 .977 Crossway Dr
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Dr
Right
16 Thru
16 Left
65 Out In Total
189 97 286
Right
47 Thru
760
Left
161
Out Total In
1466 968 2434
Left
137
Thru
37 Right
133
Out In Total
238 307 545
Left
105 1268
Thru Right
61 Total Out In
913 1434 2347
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Passenger
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Buses
Crossway Drive
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Drive
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 8
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
05:30 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
Total 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8
Grand Total 2 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 12 0 25
Apprch % 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 100 0
Total % 8 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 4 0 48 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Crossway Drive
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Drive
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 5 8
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .625 .000 .625 .667 Crossway Drive
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Drive
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
2 Left
0 Out Total In
6 2 8
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
1 Out In Total
0 1 1
Left
0 Thru
5 Right
0 Total Out In
2 5 7
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Buses
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Crossway Drive
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Drive
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
05:30 PM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
Total Volume 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 8
% App. Total 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .667 Crossway Drive
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Drive
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
2 Out In Total
0 2 2
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
0 Out Total In
5 3 8
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
3 Right
0 Total Out In
3 3 6
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Buses
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Motorcycles
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 9
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 7
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 11 2 0 19
Apprch % 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 84.6 15.4 0
Total % 0 0 0 0 31.6 0 0 0 0 57.9 10.5 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .750 Crossway Dr
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Dr
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Right
0 Thru
2 Left
0 Out Total In
0 2 2
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
1 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
2 1 3
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Motorcycles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 9
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 66.7 33.3 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 .000 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .500 .000 .750 .750 Crossway Dr
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Dr
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
4 0 4
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
0 Out Total In
2 3 5
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
4 Thru
2 Right
0 Total Out In
3 6 9
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
Motorcycles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 2 Axle
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 8
07:15 AM 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 11 1 18
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 1 0 7 0 17
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 16
Total 1 0 0 0 25 0 2 0 2 0 28 1 59
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 12
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 20
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 23
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 14
Total 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 40 1 69
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 9
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 12
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 12
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 12
Total 0 0 0 0 19 0 1 0 0 0 25 0 45
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 12
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 0 8
05:45 PM 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 7
Total 0 0 0 1 7 1 0 1 1 0 21 0 32
Grand Total 1 0 0 1 79 1 3 1 3 0 114 2 205
Apprch % 100 0 0 1.2 97.5 1.2 42.9 14.3 42.9 0 98.3 1.7 Total % 0.5 0 0 0.5 38.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 1.5 0 55.6 1

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 16
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 12
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 10 20
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 23
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 30 1 0 0 1 0 39 1 40 71
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 97.5 2.5
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .574 .250 .588 .772 Crossway Dr
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Dr
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
30 Left
0 Out Total In
39 30 69
Left
1 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
1 1 2
Left
0 Thru
39 Right
1 Total Out In
31 40 71
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM
2 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 12
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 8 0 8 12
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 12
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 12
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 1 0 0 1 0 30 0 30 48
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .607 .000 .607 .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .833 .000 .833 1.00 Crossway Dr
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Dr
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
17 Left
0 Out Total In
30 17 47
Left
1 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 1 1
Left
0 Thru
30 Right
0 Total Out In
18 30 48
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
2 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 3 Axle
Crossway Drive
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Drive
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 6
Total 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 21
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 9
08:15 AM 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 10
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 5
Total 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 1 17 0 31
04:00 PM 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 11
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 7
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8
Total 0 0 0 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 29
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8
Total 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 21
Grand Total 1 0 0 1 48 0 0 0 1 1 50 0 102
Apprch % 100 0 0 2 98 0 0 0 100 2 98 0
Total % 1 0 0 1 47.1 0 0 0 1 1 49 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Crossway Drive
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Drive
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 6
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 8 9
08:15 AM 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 7
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 10
Total Volume 1 0 0 1 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 20 0 21 32
% App. Total 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 4.8 95.2 0
PHF .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .714 .000 .656 .800 Crossway Drive
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Drive
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
1 Out In Total
1 1 2
Right
0 Thru
10 Left
0 Out Total In
21 10 31
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
1 Thru
20 Right
0 Total Out In
10 21 31
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM
3 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Crossway Drive
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Drive
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 11
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 7
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 8
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 29
% App. Total 0 0 0 5.6 94.4 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .708 .000 .750 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .550 .000 .550 .659 Crossway Drive
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Drive
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
17 Left
1 Out Total In
11 18 29
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Left
0 Thru
11 Right
0 Total Out In
17 11 28
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
3 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 4+ Axles
Crossway Drive
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Drive
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 29
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 33
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 25
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 31
Total 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 118
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 22
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 24
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 15 1 28
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 13 1 25
Total 0 0 0 0 41 0 1 0 2 0 53 2 99
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 16
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 17
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 14
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 18
Total 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 65
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 15
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 15
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 10
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 13
Total 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 53
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 153 0 1 0 2 0 177 2 335
Apprch % 0 0 0 0 100 0 33.3 0 66.7 0 98.9 1.1
Total % 0 0 0 0 45.7 0 0.3 0 0.6 0 52.8 0.6

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Crossway Drive
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Drive
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 29
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 33
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 25
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 31
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 65 118
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .946 .000 .946 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .813 .000 .813 .894 Crossway Drive
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Drive
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
53 Left
0 Out Total In
65 53 118
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
65 Right
0 Total Out In
53 65 118
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
4+ Axles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Crossway Drive
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Drive
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 16
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 17
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 14
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 18
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 35 65
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .875 .000 .875 .903 Crossway Drive
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Drive
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
30 Left
0 Out Total In
35 30 65
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
35 Right
0 Total Out In
30 35 65
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
4+ Axles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 2 10
07:15 AM 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 7
07:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 2 1 6 0 6 0 3 18
08:00 AM 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 5
08:15 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
08:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3
08:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
Total 1 1 0 6 0 3 0 2 13
04:00 PM 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 9
04:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
04:30 PM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3
04:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 8
Total 1 0 0 13 1 2 1 5 23
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 6
05:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 3
05:30 PM 1 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 8
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 9
Total 1 0 1 3 4 2 5 10 26
Grand Total 3 3 2 28 5 13 6 20 80
Apprch % 50 50 6.7 93.3 27.8 72.2 23.1 76.9
Total % 3.8 3.8 2.5 35 6.2 16.2 7.5 25

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 5 5 0 2 2 10
07:15 AM 0 2 2 1 2 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 7
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume 0 2 2 1 6 7 0 6 6 0 3 3 18
% App. Total 0 100 14.3 85.7 0 100 0 100
PHF .000 .250 .250 .250 .500 .583 .000 .300 .300 .000 .375 .375 .450 Crossway Dr
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Dr
Thru
0 Peds
2 Out In Total
0 2 2
Thru
1 Peds
6 Out Total In
0 7 7
Thru
0 Peds
6 Out In Total
0 6 6
Thru
0 Peds
3 Total Out In
1 3 4
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Crossway_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Crossway Dr
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Towne Center Dr
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 4 6
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
05:30 PM 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 3 8
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 6 7 9
Total Volume 1 0 1 1 3 4 4 2 6 5 10 15 26
% App. Total 100 0 25 75 66.7 33.3 33.3 66.7
PHF .250 .000 .250 .250 .375 .500 .500 .250 .750 .625 .417 .536 .722 Crossway Dr
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Towne Center Dr
Thru
1 Peds
0 Out In Total
4 1 5
Thru
1 Peds
3 Out Total In
5 4 9
Thru
4 Peds
2 Out In Total
1 6 7
Thru
5 Peds
10 Total Out In
1 15 16
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Passenger
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 150 3 0 0 2 1 81 0 4 0 4 246
07:15 AM 1 162 2 1 0 2 5 89 0 4 0 7 273
07:30 AM 1 176 0 2 0 1 3 92 0 5 0 5 285
07:45 AM 4 153 5 2 0 2 2 107 0 1 0 9 285
Total 7 641 10 5 0 7 11 369 0 14 0 25 1089
08:00 AM 4 158 7 1 0 3 2 72 0 3 0 12 262
08:15 AM 2 126 5 1 0 5 5 97 0 6 0 13 260
08:30 AM 1 137 1 2 0 2 4 92 0 0 0 5 244
08:45 AM 3 126 4 1 0 2 5 91 2 2 0 8 244
Total 10 547 17 5 0 12 16 352 2 11 0 38 1010
04:00 PM 9 218 6 3 0 2 7 264 0 10 0 4 523
04:15 PM 9 175 3 2 0 2 7 243 2 8 0 9 460
04:30 PM 2 206 8 1 0 3 8 246 0 15 0 6 495
04:45 PM 4 225 7 3 0 4 7 229 2 12 1 3 497
Total 24 824 24 9 0 11 29 982 4 45 1 22 1975
05:00 PM 5 207 6 1 0 5 3 237 1 13 0 9 487
05:15 PM 7 217 4 2 0 2 5 276 4 10 2 5 534
05:30 PM 5 223 3 1 0 3 7 211 0 8 0 13 474
05:45 PM 10 238 0 1 0 2 9 223 2 12 1 8 506
Total 27 885 13 5 0 12 24 947 7 43 3 35 2001
Grand Total 68 2897 64 24 0 42 80 2650 13 113 4 120 6075 Apprch % 2.2 95.6 2.1 36.4 0 63.6 2.9 96.6 0.5 47.7 1.7 50.6 Total % 1.1 47.7 1.1 0.4 0 0.7 1.3 43.6 0.2 1.9 0.1 2

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 1 162 2 165 1 0 2 3 5 89 0 94 4 0 7 11 273
07:30 AM 1 176 0 177 2 0 1 3 3 92 0 95 5 0 5 10 285
07:45 AM 4 153 5 162 2 0 2 4 2 107 0 109 1 0 9 10 285
08:00 AM 4 158 7 169 1 0 3 4 2 72 0 74 3 0 12 15 262
Total Volume 10 649 14 673 6 0 8 14 12 360 0 372 13 0 33 46 1105 % App. Total 1.5 96.4 2.1 42.9 0 57.1 3.2 96.8 0 28.3 0 71.7 PHF .625 .922 .500 .951 .750 .000 .667 .875 .600 .841 .000 .853 .650 .000 .688 .767 .969 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
14 Thru
649
Left
10 Out In Total
381 673 1054
Right
8 Thru
0 Left
6 Out Total In
10 14 24
Left
12 Thru
360
Right
0 Out In Total
688 372 1060
Left
13 Thru
0 Right
33 Total Out In
26 46 72
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Passenger
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 2 206 8 216 1 0 3 4 8 246 0 254 15 0 6 21 495
04:45 PM 4 225 7 236 3 0 4 7 7 229 2 238 12 1 3 16 497
05:00 PM 5 207 6 218 1 0 5 6 3 237 1 241 13 0 9 22 487
05:15 PM 7 217 4 228 2 0 2 4 5 276 4 285 10 2 5 17 534
Total Volume 18 855 25 898 7 0 14 21 23 988 7 1018 50 3 23 76 2013 % App. Total 2 95.2 2.8 33.3 0 66.7 2.3 97.1 0.7 65.8 3.9 30.3 PHF .643 .950 .781 .951 .583 .000 .700 .750 .719 .895 .438 .893 .833 .375 .639 .864 .942 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
25 Thru
855
Left
18 Out In Total
1052 898 1950
Right
14 Thru
0 Left
7 Out Total In
28 21 49
Left
23 Thru
988
Right
7 Out In Total
885 1018 1903
Left
50 Thru
3 Right
23 Total Out In
48 76 124
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Passenger
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Buses
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
07:15 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
07:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 11
08:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
08:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
08:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7
04:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
04:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
04:30 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
04:45 PM 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7
Total 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 16
05:00 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
05:15 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
05:30 PM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
05:45 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Total 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 17
Grand Total 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 51
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
Total % 0 64.7 0 0 0 0 0 35.3 0 0 0 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
07:15 AM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
07:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 11
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .417 .000 .417 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .000 .000 .000 .550 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
5 Left
0 Out In Total
6 5 11
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
6 Right
0 Out In Total
5 6 11
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Buses
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
04:30 PM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
04:45 PM 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 7
05:00 PM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Total Volume 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 19
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .600 .000 .600 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .875 .000 .875 .000 .000 .000 .000 .679 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
12 Left
0 Out In Total
7 12 19
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
7 Right
0 Out In Total
12 7 19
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Buses
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Motorcycles
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
08:00 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
05:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 5
Grand Total 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 2 13
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 33.3 0 66.7
Total % 0 38.5 0 0 0 0 0 38.5 0 7.7 0 15.4

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:45 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:00 AM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total Volume 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
4 Left
0 Out In Total
0 4 4
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
4 0 4
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Motorcycles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 2
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
05:45 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 5
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 .000 .375 .000 .000 .250 .250 .625 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
3 1 4
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
3 Right
0 Out In Total
2 3 5
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
1 Total Out In
0 1 1
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Motorcycles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 2 Axle
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 12
07:15 AM 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 9
07:30 AM 0 13 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 21
07:45 AM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 10
Total 0 30 1 0 0 0 1 19 0 0 0 1 52
08:00 AM 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 15
08:15 AM 0 12 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 1 22
08:30 AM 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 1 0 1 21
08:45 AM 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 3 19
Total 0 36 0 0 0 0 2 31 0 2 0 6 77
04:00 PM 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 8
04:15 PM 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 10
04:30 PM 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 10
04:45 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Total 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 33
05:00 PM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 9
05:15 PM 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 13
05:30 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 9
05:45 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 5
Total 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 1 0 36
Grand Total 0 102 1 0 0 0 3 82 0 2 1 7 198
Apprch % 0 99 1 0 0 0 3.5 96.5 0 20 10 70
Total % 0 51.5 0.5 0 0 0 1.5 41.4 0 1 0.5 3.5

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 15
08:15 AM 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 9 0 0 1 1 22
08:30 AM 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 11 1 0 1 2 21
08:45 AM 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 1 0 3 4 19
Total Volume 0 36 0 36 0 0 0 0 2 31 0 33 2 0 6 8 77
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 6.1 93.9 0 25 0 75
PHF .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .775 .000 .750 .500 .000 .500 .500 .875 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
36 Left
0 Out In Total
33 36 69
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
2 Thru
31 Right
0 Out In Total
42 33 75
Left
2 Thru
0 Right
6 Total Out In
2 8 10
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
2 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 10
04:45 PM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
05:00 PM 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 9
05:15 PM 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 13
Total Volume 0 19 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 37
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .679 .000 .679 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .000 .000 .000 .712 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
19 Left
0 Out In Total
18 19 37
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
18 Right
0 Out In Total
19 18 37
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
2 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 3 Axle
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
07:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4
07:30 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
07:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
Total 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 14
08:00 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 5
08:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 5
08:30 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6
08:45 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Total 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 21
04:00 PM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6
04:15 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
04:45 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 5
Total 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 17
05:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
05:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
05:30 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
Grand Total 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 57
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
Total % 0 56.1 0 0 0 0 0 43.9 0 0 0 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 5
08:15 AM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 5
08:30 AM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 6
08:45 AM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Total Volume 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 21
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .833 .000 .833 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .917 .000 .917 .000 .000 .000 .000 .875 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
10 Left
0 Out In Total
11 10 21
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
11 Right
0 Out In Total
10 11 21
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
3 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 6
04:15 PM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
04:45 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 5
Total Volume 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 17
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .563 .000 .563 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .667 .000 .667 .000 .000 .000 .000 .708 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
9 Left
0 Out In Total
8 9 17
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
8 Right
0 Out In Total
9 8 17
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
3 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 4+ Axles
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
07:15 AM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 8
07:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4
07:45 AM 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 8
Total 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 25
08:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4
08:30 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8
08:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4
Total 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 17
04:00 PM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
04:15 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
04:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5
04:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 15
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
05:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4
05:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
05:45 PM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6
Total 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 16
Grand Total 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 73
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
Total % 0 49.3 0 0 0 0 0 50.7 0 0 0 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
07:15 AM 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 8
07:30 AM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4
07:45 AM 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 8
Total Volume 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 25
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .700 .000 .700 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .688 .000 .688 .000 .000 .000 .000 .781 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
14 Left
0 Out In Total
11 14 25
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
11 Right
0 Out In Total
14 11 25
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
4+ Axles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage
Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
05:15 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4
05:30 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
05:45 PM 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 6
Total Volume 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 16
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .438 .000 .438 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .563 .000 .563 .000 .000 .000 .000 .667 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
7 Left
0 Out In Total
9 7 16
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
0 Thru
9 Right
0 Out In Total
7 9 16
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
4+ Axles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Right Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 5
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3
07:30 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 3 3 13
08:15 AM 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 6
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 3
Total 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 4 10
04:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 5
04:15 PM 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 10
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
Total 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 3 6 21
05:00 PM 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 4
05:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 8
Grand Total 0 13 4 0 15 0 1 6 13 52
Apprch % 0 100 21.1 0 78.9 0 100 31.6 68.4
Total % 0 25 7.7 0 28.8 0 1.9 11.5 25

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Right Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 5
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 3
07:30 AM 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total Volume 0 3 3 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 3 3 6 13
% App. Total 0 100 25 0 75 0 0 50 50
PHF .000 .375 .375 .250 .000 .375 .500 .000 .000 .000 .375 .750 .500 .650 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Thru
0 Peds
3 Out In Total
0 3 3
Right
0 Thru
1 Peds
3 Out Total In
3 4 7
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Thru
3 Peds
3 Total Out In
1 6 7
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Coffman-Pico_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Coffman-Pico Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Right Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 5
04:15 PM 0 7 7 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 10
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 4
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2
Total Volume 0 8 8 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 6 9 21
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 33.3 66.7
PHF .000 .286 .286 .000 .000 .500 .500 .000 .000 .000 .375 .500 .750 .525 Rosemead Blvd
Coffman-Pico Rd
Rosemead Blvd (Frontage Rd)
Rosemead Blvd
Thru
0 Peds
8 Out In Total
0 8 8
Right
0 Thru
0 Peds
4 Out Total In
3 4 7
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out In Total
0 0 0
Thru
3 Peds
6 Total Out In
0 9 9
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Passenger
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 29 107 17 30 182 15 22 48 9 13 106 8 586
07:15 AM 29 112 24 34 193 10 13 42 6 14 85 15 577
07:30 AM 36 132 28 47 247 18 12 69 5 15 125 13 747
07:45 AM 26 126 26 45 189 15 19 73 16 22 112 27 696
Total 120 477 95 156 811 58 66 232 36 64 428 63 2606
08:00 AM 34 112 17 38 161 8 21 45 14 14 136 21 621
08:15 AM 26 106 21 34 158 16 20 68 13 16 88 15 581
08:30 AM 34 98 20 31 159 20 15 45 9 25 87 22 565
08:45 AM 31 100 24 33 148 19 19 63 23 26 102 24 612
Total 125 416 82 136 626 63 75 221 59 81 413 82 2379
04:00 PM 23 141 26 43 141 23 19 166 41 45 192 29 889
04:15 PM 28 126 33 38 159 32 28 154 29 59 203 25 914
04:30 PM 31 145 26 41 154 28 39 160 41 50 242 38 995
04:45 PM 23 144 30 46 173 34 27 149 38 49 230 41 984
Total 105 556 115 168 627 117 113 629 149 203 867 133 3782 05:00 PM 33 149 34 44 156 48 20 128 41 63 230 49 995
05:15 PM 26 186 29 34 154 50 22 149 28 74 201 48 1001
05:30 PM 40 154 18 56 150 44 27 125 33 53 246 58 1004
05:45 PM 41 188 14 40 127 39 34 104 25 76 196 61 945
Total 140 677 95 174 587 181 103 506 127 266 873 216 3945 Grand Total 490 2126 387 634 2651 419 357 1588 371 614 2581 494 12712 Apprch % 16.3 70.8 12.9 17.1 71.6 11.3 15.4 68.6 16 16.6 70 13.4 Total % 3.9 16.7 3 5 20.9 3.3 2.8 12.5 2.9 4.8 20.3 3.9

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 36 132 28 196 47 247 18 312 12 69 5 86 15 125 13 153 747 07:45 AM 26 126 26 178 45 189 15 249 19 73 16 108 22 112 27 161 696 08:00 AM 34 112 17 163 38 161 8 207 21 45 14 80 14 136 21 171 621 08:15 AM 26 106 21 153 34 158 16 208 20 68 13 101 16 88 15 119 581 Total Volume 122 476 92 690 164 755 57 976 72 255 48 375 67 461 76 604 2645 % App. Total 17.7 69 13.3 16.8 77.4 5.8 19.2 68 12.8 11.1 76.3 12.6 PHF .847 .902 .821 .880 .872 .764 .792 .782 .857 .873 .750 .868 .761 .847 .704 .883 .885 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
92 Thru
476
Left
122
Out In Total
379 690 1069
Right
57 Thru
755
Left
164
Out Total In
631 976 1607
Left
72 Thru
255
Right
48 Out In Total
716 375 1091
Left
67 Thru
461
Right
76 Total Out In
919 604 1523
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Passenger
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_Passenger
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 23 144 30 197 46 173 34 253 27 149 38 214 49 230 41 320 984 05:00 PM 33 149 34 216 44 156 48 248 20 128 41 189 63 230 49 342 995 05:15 PM 26 186 29 241 34 154 50 238 22 149 28 199 74 201 48 323 1001 05:30 PM 40 154 18 212 56 150 44 250 27 125 33 185 53 246 58 357 1004 Total Volume 122 633 111 866 180 633 176 989 96 551 140 787 239 907 196 1342 3984 % App. Total 14.1 73.1 12.8 18.2 64 17.8 12.2 70 17.8 17.8 67.6 14.6 PHF .763 .851 .816 .898 .804 .915 .880 .977 .889 .924 .854 .919 .807 .922 .845 .940 .992 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
111
Thru
633
Left
122
Out In Total
966 866 1832
Right
176
Thru
633
Left
180
Out Total In
1169 989 2158
Left
96 Thru
551
Right
140
Out In Total
1009 787 1796
Left
239
Thru
907
Right
196
Total Out In
840 1342 2182
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Passenger
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Buses
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3
07:15 AM 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 10
07:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 7
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Total 0 6 0 0 2 1 0 6 2 0 6 0 23
08:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
08:15 AM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5
08:30 AM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4
08:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4
Total 0 5 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 1 15
04:00 PM 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 5
04:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
04:30 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 5
04:45 PM 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 9
Total 0 10 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 22
05:00 PM 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 8
05:15 PM 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6
05:30 PM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
05:45 PM 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 7
Total 0 13 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 25
Grand Total 0 34 0 2 10 1 0 18 2 0 17 1 85
Apprch % 0 100 0 15.4 76.9 7.7 0 90 10 0 94.4 5.6
Total % 0 40 0 2.4 11.8 1.2 0 21.2 2.4 0 20 1.2

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 3
07:15 AM 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 10
07:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 7
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 3
Total Volume 0 6 0 6 0 2 1 3 0 6 2 8 0 6 0 6 23
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 66.7 33.3 0 75 25 0 100 0
PHF .000 .375 .000 .375 .000 .500 .250 .375 .000 .750 .250 .500 .000 .500 .000 .500 .575 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
6 Left
0 Out In Total
7 6 13
Right
1 Thru
2 Left
0 Out Total In
8 3 11
Left
0 Thru
6 Right
2 Out In Total
6 8 14
Left
0 Thru
6 Right
0 Total Out In
2 6 8
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Buses
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_Buses
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 5
04:45 PM 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 9
05:00 PM 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 8
05:15 PM 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 6
Total Volume 0 14 0 14 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 6 0 6 28
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .700 .000 .700 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .625 .000 .625 .000 .750 .000 .750 .778 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
14 Left
0 Out In Total
5 14 19
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
0 Out Total In
6 3 9
Left
0 Thru
5 Right
0 Out In Total
14 5 19
Left
0 Thru
6 Right
0 Total Out In
3 6 9
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Buses
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Motorcycles
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
08:00 AM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 7
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
05:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4
Grand Total 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 3 0 1 2 1 19
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 25 50 25
Total % 0 26.3 0 0 36.8 0 0 15.8 0 5.3 10.5 5.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:00 AM 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .375 .000 .375 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
0 Out In Total
1 3 4
Right
0 Thru
2 Left
0 Out Total In
0 2 2
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
0 Out In Total
3 1 4
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Total Out In
2 0 2
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM
Motorcycles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_Motorcycles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 4
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 7
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 25 50 25
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 .000 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .500 .250 .500 .438 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Right
0 Thru
3 Left
0 Out Total In
2 3 5
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Left
1 Thru
2 Right
1 Total Out In
3 4 7
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
Motorcycles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 2 Axle
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 4 1 1 2 2 0 4 1 0 4 0 19
07:15 AM 3 4 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 7 2 22
07:30 AM 3 10 3 0 5 0 0 6 0 1 7 1 36
07:45 AM 1 2 2 0 8 1 1 4 1 0 4 0 24
Total 7 20 7 1 17 3 2 15 2 2 22 3 101
08:00 AM 2 7 2 1 2 1 0 2 2 0 6 0 25
08:15 AM 4 5 3 0 6 2 1 6 1 0 8 1 37
08:30 AM 2 5 2 3 3 1 1 6 2 5 9 0 39
08:45 AM 1 5 2 1 4 2 2 7 0 1 4 0 29
Total 9 22 9 5 15 6 4 21 5 6 27 1 130
04:00 PM 1 3 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 5 1 18
04:15 PM 2 4 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 0 3 1 23
04:30 PM 2 2 0 0 4 2 0 2 2 1 5 0 20
04:45 PM 0 2 0 3 4 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 16
Total 5 11 2 4 16 4 2 9 3 1 18 2 77
05:00 PM 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 3 0 1 6 0 17
05:15 PM 1 4 2 2 0 0 0 4 0 1 2 0 16
05:30 PM 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 2 2 1 1 15
05:45 PM 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 4 1 16
Total 2 12 2 5 7 0 1 13 3 4 13 2 64
Grand Total 23 65 20 15 55 13 9 58 13 13 80 8 372
Apprch % 21.3 60.2 18.5 18.1 66.3 15.7 11.2 72.5 16.2 12.9 79.2 7.9 Total % 6.2 17.5 5.4 4 14.8 3.5 2.4 15.6 3.5 3.5 21.5 2.2

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 2 7 2 11 1 2 1 4 0 2 2 4 0 6 0 6 25
08:15 AM 4 5 3 12 0 6 2 8 1 6 1 8 0 8 1 9 37
08:30 AM 2 5 2 9 3 3 1 7 1 6 2 9 5 9 0 14 39
08:45 AM 1 5 2 8 1 4 2 7 2 7 0 9 1 4 0 5 29
Total Volume 9 22 9 40 5 15 6 26 4 21 5 30 6 27 1 34 130 % App. Total 22.5 55 22.5 19.2 57.7 23.1 13.3 70 16.7 17.6 79.4 2.9 PHF .563 .786 .750 .833 .417 .625 .750 .813 .500 .750 .625 .833 .300 .750 .250 .607 .833 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
9 Thru
22 Left
9 Out In Total
33 40 73
Right
6 Thru
15 Left
5 Out Total In
41 26 67
Left
4 Thru
21 Right
5 Out In Total
28 30 58
Left
6 Thru
27 Right
1 Total Out In
28 34 62
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
2 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_2-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 1 3 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 1 6 18
04:15 PM 2 4 2 8 1 3 2 6 2 2 1 5 0 3 1 4 23
04:30 PM 2 2 0 4 0 4 2 6 0 2 2 4 1 5 0 6 20
04:45 PM 0 2 0 2 3 4 0 7 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 5 16
Total Volume 5 11 2 18 4 16 4 24 2 9 3 14 1 18 2 21 77
% App. Total 27.8 61.1 11.1 16.7 66.7 16.7 14.3 64.3 21.4 4.8 85.7 9.5 PHF .625 .688 .250 .563 .333 .800 .500 .857 .250 .750 .375 .700 .250 .900 .500 .875 .837 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
2 Thru
11 Left
5 Out In Total
14 18 32
Right
4 Thru
16 Left
4 Out Total In
26 24 50
Left
2 Thru
9 Right
3 Out In Total
17 14 31
Left
1 Thru
18 Right
2 Total Out In
20 21 41
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
2 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 3 Axle
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
07:15 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 7
07:30 AM 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 8
07:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 10
Total 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 0 10 0 31
08:00 AM 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 4 0 10
08:15 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 10
08:30 AM 0 1 2 1 3 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 14
08:45 AM 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 11
Total 2 5 5 2 6 1 0 2 1 8 13 0 45
04:00 PM 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 11
04:15 PM 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 7
04:30 PM 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 8
04:45 PM 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 10
Total 0 7 3 0 12 0 4 3 0 4 3 0 36
05:00 PM 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
05:15 PM 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
05:30 PM 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4
05:45 PM 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 9
Total 0 3 1 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 23
Grand Total 2 24 9 2 37 1 5 10 1 12 32 0 135
Apprch % 5.7 68.6 25.7 5 92.5 2.5 31.2 62.5 6.2 27.3 72.7 0 Total % 1.5 17.8 6.7 1.5 27.4 0.7 3.7 7.4 0.7 8.9 23.7 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 4 0 6 10
08:15 AM 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 10
08:30 AM 0 1 2 3 1 3 0 4 0 1 1 2 1 4 0 5 14
08:45 AM 1 2 2 5 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 11
Total Volume 2 5 5 12 2 6 1 9 0 2 1 3 8 13 0 21 45
% App. Total 16.7 41.7 41.7 22.2 66.7 11.1 0 66.7 33.3 38.1 61.9 0 PHF .500 .625 .625 .600 .500 .500 .250 .563 .000 .500 .250 .375 .500 .813 .000 .875 .804 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
5 Thru
5 Left
2 Out In Total
11 12 23
Right
1 Thru
6 Left
2 Out Total In
16 9 25
Left
0 Thru
2 Right
1 Out In Total
7 3 10
Left
8 Thru
13 Right
0 Total Out In
11 21 32
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
3 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_3-Axle
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 2 2 4 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 1 0 3 11
04:15 PM 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 7
04:30 PM 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 2 1 0 3 1 0 0 1 8
04:45 PM 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 10
Total Volume 0 7 3 10 0 12 0 12 4 3 0 7 4 3 0 7 36
% App. Total 0 70 30 0 100 0 57.1 42.9 0 57.1 42.9 0
PHF .000 .583 .375 .625 .000 .600 .000 .600 .500 .375 .000 .583 .500 .750 .000 .583 .818 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
3 Thru
7 Left
0 Out In Total
7 10 17
Right
0 Thru
12 Left
0 Out Total In
3 12 15
Left
4 Thru
3 Right
0 Out In Total
7 7 14
Left
4 Thru
3 Right
0 Total Out In
19 7 26
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
3 Axle
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- 4+ Axles
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 1 2 2 12 1 0 0 1 1 11 2 33
07:15 AM 2 1 1 1 11 3 0 0 0 1 17 0 37
07:30 AM 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 1 0 1 11 0 25
07:45 AM 0 3 2 0 12 1 0 1 1 1 18 1 40
Total 2 5 7 3 45 5 0 2 2 4 57 3 135
08:00 AM 0 0 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 20
08:15 AM 0 1 1 2 7 1 0 2 0 0 15 1 30
08:30 AM 0 2 2 2 7 2 0 3 1 0 17 0 36
08:45 AM 0 0 1 0 8 1 1 1 0 1 10 2 25
Total 0 3 5 5 32 4 1 6 1 1 49 4 111
04:00 PM 0 2 2 4 6 0 1 0 2 0 7 0 24
04:15 PM 0 1 2 2 7 0 0 1 0 1 8 0 22
04:30 PM 0 1 1 0 5 1 0 2 2 2 7 1 22
04:45 PM 0 1 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 19
Total 0 5 5 7 27 1 1 3 4 3 30 1 87
05:00 PM 0 0 1 1 8 1 0 2 0 1 5 0 19
05:15 PM 0 3 0 1 9 0 0 1 0 1 6 1 22
05:30 PM 0 0 1 1 4 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 13
05:45 PM 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 15
Total 0 4 5 4 24 1 1 6 1 5 17 1 69
Grand Total 2 17 22 19 128 11 3 17 8 13 153 9 402
Apprch % 4.9 41.5 53.7 12 81 7 10.7 60.7 28.6 7.4 87.4 5.1 Total % 0.5 4.2 5.5 4.7 31.8 2.7 0.7 4.2 2 3.2 38.1 2.2

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 1 2 3 2 12 1 15 0 0 1 1 1 11 2 14 33
07:15 AM 2 1 1 4 1 11 3 15 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 18 37
07:30 AM 0 0 2 2 0 10 0 10 0 1 0 1 1 11 0 12 25
07:45 AM 0 3 2 5 0 12 1 13 0 1 1 2 1 18 1 20 40
Total Volume 2 5 7 14 3 45 5 53 0 2 2 4 4 57 3 64 135
% App. Total 14.3 35.7 50 5.7 84.9 9.4 0 50 50 6.2 89.1 4.7 PHF .250 .417 .875 .700 .375 .938 .417 .883 .000 .500 .500 .500 1.00 .792 .375 .800 .844 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
7 Thru
5 Left
2 Out In Total
11 14 25
Right
5 Thru
45 Left
3 Out Total In
61 53 114
Left
0 Thru
2 Right
2 Out In Total
11 4 15
Left
4 Thru
57 Right
3 Total Out In
52 64 116
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
4+ Axles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_4+Axles
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 0 2 2 4 4 6 0 10 1 0 2 3 0 7 0 7 24
04:15 PM 0 1 2 3 2 7 0 9 0 1 0 1 1 8 0 9 22
04:30 PM 0 1 1 2 0 5 1 6 0 2 2 4 2 7 1 10 22
04:45 PM 0 1 0 1 1 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 19
Total Volume 0 5 5 10 7 27 1 35 1 3 4 8 3 30 1 34 87
% App. Total 0 50 50 20 77.1 2.9 12.5 37.5 50 8.8 88.2 2.9 PHF .000 .625 .625 .625 .438 .750 .250 .875 .250 .375 .500 .500 .375 .938 .250 .850 .906 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Right
5 Thru
5 Left
0 Out In Total
7 10 17
Right
1 Thru
27 Left
7 Out Total In
34 35 69
Left
1 Thru
3 Right
4 Out In Total
13 8 21
Left
3 Thru
30 Right
1 Total Out In
33 34 67
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
4+ Axles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 3 9
07:15 AM 1 1 0 3 0 1 2 3 11
07:30 AM 1 2 1 5 1 3 0 3 16
07:45 AM 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 2 16
Total 2 10 1 14 1 10 3 11 52
08:00 AM 0 4 0 3 1 3 0 2 13
08:15 AM 1 5 1 6 1 4 1 4 23
08:30 AM 0 2 0 6 0 5 0 2 15
08:45 AM 0 5 1 4 1 5 0 3 19
Total 1 16 2 19 3 17 1 11 70
04:00 PM 0 5 0 10 1 6 0 4 26
04:15 PM 0 5 0 6 0 6 0 3 20
04:30 PM 1 3 1 10 0 4 2 0 21
04:45 PM 0 5 0 12 1 5 1 3 27
Total 1 18 1 38 2 21 3 10 94
05:00 PM 1 13 0 15 1 8 0 4 42
05:15 PM 1 11 2 9 0 6 1 3 33
05:30 PM 1 7 0 7 1 7 1 3 27
05:45 PM 0 5 0 11 0 6 0 2 24
Total 3 36 2 42 2 27 2 12 126
Grand Total 7 80 6 113 8 75 9 44 342
Apprch % 8 92 5 95 9.6 90.4 17 83
Total % 2 23.4 1.8 33 2.3 21.9 2.6 12.9

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 0 4 4 0 3 3 1 3 4 0 2 2 13
08:15 AM 1 5 6 1 6 7 1 4 5 1 4 5 23
08:30 AM 0 2 2 0 6 6 0 5 5 0 2 2 15
08:45 AM 0 5 5 1 4 5 1 5 6 0 3 3 19
Total Volume 1 16 17 2 19 21 3 17 20 1 11 12 70
% App. Total 5.9 94.1 9.5 90.5 15 85 8.3 91.7
PHF .250 .800 .708 .500 .792 .750 .750 .850 .833 .250 .688 .600 .761 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Thru
1 Peds
16 Out In Total
3 17 20
Thru
2 Peds
19 Out Total In
1 21 22
Thru
3 Peds
17 Out In Total
1 20 21
Thru
1 Peds
11 Total Out In
2 12 14
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/9/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 0 5 5 0 12 12 1 5 6 1 3 4 27
05:00 PM 1 13 14 0 15 15 1 8 9 0 4 4 42
05:15 PM 1 11 12 2 9 11 0 6 6 1 3 4 33
05:30 PM 1 7 8 0 7 7 1 7 8 1 3 4 27
Total Volume 3 36 39 2 43 45 3 26 29 3 13 16 129
% App. Total 7.7 92.3 4.4 95.6 10.3 89.7 18.8 81.2
PHF .750 .692 .696 .250 .717 .750 .750 .813 .806 .750 .813 1.00 .768 Rosemead Blvd
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
Thru
3 Peds
36 Out In Total
3 39 42
Thru
2 Peds
43 Out Total In
3 45 48
Thru
3 Peds
26 Out In Total
3 29 32
Thru
3 Peds
13 Total Out In
2 16 18
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
City Traffic Counters
www.ctcounters.com
Rosemead Blvd
Btwn Washington Blvd & Whittier Blvd

Start 09-Mar-21 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 31 219 26 181
12:15 34 225 19 220
12:30 20 212 18 202
12:45 24 217 109 873 11 189 74 792 183 1665
01:00 16 208 9 206
01:15 12 212 6 204
01:30 16 200 11 197
01:45 17 233 61 853 9 195 35 802 96 1655
02:00 14 242 15 224
02:15 16 262 0 193
02:30 13 254 10 221
02:45 8 242 51 1000 15 224 40 862 91 1862
03:00 10 263 9 220
03:15 5 221 10 213
03:30 24 294 19 222
03:45 17 288 56 1066 20 250 58 905 114 1971
04:00 16 285 16 260
04:15 13 288 38 206
04:30 23 305 45 246
04:45 29 284 81 1162 48 248 147 960 228 2122
05:00 42 315 47 239
05:15 46 348 65 240
05:30 59 303 75 254
05:45 79 323 226 1289 121 242 308 975 534 2264
06:00 76 318 97 209
06:15 69 250 107 218
06:30 76 256 149 214
06:45 103 254 324 1078 124 165 477 806 801 1884
07:00 99 211 172 165
07:15 120 198 178 169
07:30 143 159 229 126
07:45 134 189 496 757 179 107 758 567 1254 1324
08:00 111 166 186 117
08:15 136 130 161 106
08:30 144 112 169 90
08:45 136 121 527 529 161 89 677 402 1204 931
09:00 164 112 129 86
09:15 148 99 147 85
09:30 123 99 141 63
09:45 176 90 611 400 163 60 580 294 1191 694
10:00 152 89 149 54
10:15 176 52 159 46
10:30 174 59 171 29
10:45 165 52 667 252 167 30 646 159 1313 411
11:00 181 73 152 30
11:15 143 43 235 26
11:30 190 41 231 26
11:45 211 44 725 201 235 26 853 108 1578 309
Total 3934 9460 4653 7632 8587 17092
Percent 29.4% 70.6% 37.9% 62.1% 33.4% 66.6%
Grand
Total 3934 9460 4653 7632 8587 17092
Percent 29.4% 70.6% 37.9% 62.1% 33.4% 66.6%
ADT ADT 25,679 AADT 25,679
City Traffic Counters
www.ctcounters.com
Washington Blvd
Btwn Rosemead Blvd & Paramount Blvd

Start 09-Mar-21 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 94 377 70 242
12:15 70 326 45 224
12:30 61 375 44 229
12:45 51 365 276 1443 52 252 211 947 487 2390
01:00 59 383 25 274
01:15 61 375 50 259
01:30 67 397 29 248
01:45 56 380 243 1535 45 266 149 1047 392 2582
02:00 63 411 61 224
02:15 60 441 66 237
02:30 25 466 57 238
02:45 45 499 193 1817 45 275 229 974 422 2791
03:00 44 476 50 237
03:15 51 397 74 258
03:30 63 458 94 247
03:45 60 494 218 1825 119 278 337 1020 555 2845
04:00 102 462 84 232
04:15 99 509 102 278
04:30 112 510 151 265
04:45 113 571 426 2052 183 264 520 1039 946 3091
05:00 113 489 158 247
05:15 130 520 231 241
05:30 183 576 287 280
05:45 150 482 576 2067 355 242 1031 1010 1607 3077
06:00 188 444 269 284
06:15 188 449 340 242
06:30 226 428 286 294
06:45 214 447 816 1768 365 289 1260 1109 2076 2877
07:00 242 383 312 259
07:15 262 348 380 190
07:30 275 300 352 172
07:45 318 269 1097 1300 355 173 1399 794 2496 2094
08:00 275 274 268 166
08:15 261 267 278 142
08:30 277 238 258 152
08:45 277 183 1090 962 251 147 1055 607 2145 1569
09:00 280 172 199 179
09:15 247 171 203 131
09:30 253 147 194 111
09:45 257 146 1037 636 209 122 805 543 1842 1179
10:00 327 167 202 152
10:15 243 155 230 91
10:30 328 122 212 107
10:45 359 119 1257 563 222 85 866 435 2123 998
11:00 310 125 199 76
11:15 330 105 244 69
11:30 342 96 225 63
11:45 395 100 1377 426 232 78 900 286 2277 712
Total 8606 16394 8762 9811 17368 26205
Percent 34.4% 65.6% 47.2% 52.8% 39.9% 60.1%
Grand
Total 8606 16394 8762 9811 17368 26205
Percent 34.4% 65.6% 47.2% 52.8% 39.9% 60.1%
ADT ADT 43,573 AADT 43,573
File Name : ProjectDriveway_Washington
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Project Driveway
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Shopping Center Driveway
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 8 0 319 1 0 0 2 8 155 0 493
07:15 AM 0 0 11 0 312 3 0 0 4 16 201 1 548
07:30 AM 0 0 10 0 322 2 0 0 3 3 251 1 592
07:45 AM 0 0 9 0 306 1 0 0 0 18 261 1 596
Total 0 0 38 0 1259 7 0 0 9 45 868 3 2229
08:00 AM 0 1 9 0 376 5 0 0 5 14 203 1 614
08:15 AM 0 0 8 0 306 5 0 0 4 20 217 1 561
08:30 AM 0 0 10 0 278 6 0 0 8 20 169 1 492
08:45 AM 0 0 9 0 282 3 0 0 8 17 175 2 496
Total 0 1 36 0 1242 19 0 0 25 71 764 5 2163
04:00 PM 0 1 15 0 256 8 0 0 26 26 401 6 739
04:15 PM 0 0 11 0 234 6 0 1 18 29 328 5 632
04:30 PM 0 0 15 0 312 2 0 0 21 31 374 3 758
04:45 PM 0 0 15 0 257 2 0 1 29 19 365 6 694
Total 0 1 56 0 1059 18 0 2 94 105 1468 20 2823
05:00 PM 0 0 21 0 274 3 0 0 23 24 450 9 804
05:15 PM 0 0 16 0 255 5 0 0 26 34 409 15 760
05:30 PM 0 0 11 0 253 1 0 0 17 16 417 8 723
05:45 PM 0 0 14 0 223 1 0 0 14 30 372 7 661
Total 0 0 62 0 1005 10 0 0 80 104 1648 39 2948
Grand Total 0 2 192 0 4565 54 0 2 208 325 4748 67 10163 Apprch % 0 1 99 0 98.8 1.2 0 1 99 6.3 92.4 1.3
Total % 0 0 1.9 0 44.9 0.5 0 0 2 3.2 46.7 0.7

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : ProjectDriveway_Washington
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 2
Project Driveway
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Shopping Center Driveway
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 10 10 0 322 2 324 0 0 3 3 3 251 1 255 592
07:45 AM 0 0 9 9 0 306 1 307 0 0 0 0 18 261 1 280 596
08:00 AM 0 1 9 10 0 376 5 381 0 0 5 5 14 203 1 218 614
08:15 AM 0 0 8 8 0 306 5 311 0 0 4 4 20 217 1 238 561
Total Volume 0 1 36 37 0 1310 13 1323 0 0 12 12 55 932 4 991 2363 % App. Total 0 2.7 97.3 0 99 1 0 0 100 5.5 94 0.4
PHF .000 .250 .900 .925 .000 .871 .650 .868 .000 .000 .600 .600 .688 .893 1.00 .885 .962 Project Driveway
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Shopping Center Driveway
Right
36 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
68 37 105
Right
13 Thru
1310
Left
0 Out Total In
944 1323 2267
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
12 Out In Total
5 12 17
Left
55 Thru
932
Right
4 Total Out In
1346 991 2337
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : ProjectDriveway_Washington
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 3
Project Driveway
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Shopping Center Driveway
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 0 15 15 0 312 2 314 0 0 21 21 31 374 3 408 758 04:45 PM 0 0 15 15 0 257 2 259 0 1 29 30 19 365 6 390 694 05:00 PM 0 0 21 21 0 274 3 277 0 0 23 23 24 450 9 483 804 05:15 PM 0 0 16 16 0 255 5 260 0 0 26 26 34 409 15 458 760 Total Volume 0 0 67 67 0 1098 12 1110 0 1 99 100 108 1598 33 1739 3016 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 98.9 1.1 0 1 99 6.2 91.9 1.9
PHF .000 .000 .798 .798 .000 .880 .600 .884 .000 .250 .853 .833 .794 .888 .550 .900 .938 Project Driveway
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Shopping Center Driveway
Right
67 Thru
0 Left
0 Out In Total
121 67 188
Right
12 Thru
1098
Left
0 Out Total In
1697 1110 2807
Left
0 Thru
1 Right
99 Out In Total
33 100 133
Left
108 1598
Thru Right
33 Total Out In
1165 1739 2904
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : ProjectDriveway_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Project Driveway
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Shopping Center
Driveway
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
07:15 AM 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
07:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 3
07:45 AM 2 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 6
Total 5 3 0 0 2 4 0 1 15
08:00 AM 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 7
08:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
08:45 AM 1 4 0 1 1 1 0 0 8
Total 2 8 0 1 2 4 0 1 18
04:00 PM 2 2 0 0 0 9 1 0 14
04:15 PM 3 4 0 1 0 12 0 0 20
04:30 PM 1 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 10
04:45 PM 3 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 27
Total 9 9 0 1 0 51 1 0 71
05:00 PM 0 2 0 0 0 12 0 0 14
05:15 PM 1 3 0 1 0 16 0 0 21
05:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 1 14
05:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 13
Total 1 7 0 1 0 52 0 1 62
Grand Total 17 27 0 3 4 111 1 3 166
Apprch % 38.6 61.4 0 100 3.5 96.5 25 75
Total % 10.2 16.3 0 1.8 2.4 66.9 0.6 1.8

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : ProjectDriveway_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 2
Project Driveway
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Shopping Center Driveway
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
07:30 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 3
07:45 AM 2 1 3 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 6
08:00 AM 1 2 3 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 7
Total Volume 5 5 10 0 0 0 3 5 8 0 1 1 19
% App. Total 50 50 0 0 37.5 62.5 0 100
PHF .625 .625 .833 .000 .000 .000 .750 .625 .667 .000 .250 .250 .679 Project Driveway
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Shopping Center Driveway
Thru
5 Peds
5 Out In Total
3 10 13
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Thru
3 Peds
5 Out In Total
5 8 13
Thru
0 Peds
1 Total Out In
0 1 1
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : ProjectDriveway_Washington_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 3
Project Driveway
Southbound
Washington Blvd
Westbound
Shopping Center Driveway
Northbound
Washington Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 24 24 0 0 0 27
05:00 PM 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 14
05:15 PM 1 3 4 0 1 1 0 16 16 0 0 0 21
05:30 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 12 0 1 1 14
Total Volume 4 6 10 0 1 1 0 64 64 0 1 1 76
% App. Total 40 60 0 100 0 100 0 100
PHF .333 .500 .625 .000 .250 .250 .000 .667 .667 .000 .250 .250 .704 Project Driveway
Washington Blvd
Washington Blvd
Shopping Center Driveway
Thru
4 Peds
6 Out In Total
0 10 10
Thru
0 Peds
1 Out Total In
0 1 1
Thru
0 Peds
64 Out In Total
4 64 68
Thru
0 Peds
1 Total Out In
0 1 1
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_TheMarketplaceDriveway
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound

Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
The Marketplace Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 169 4 0 0 0 2 111 0 10 0 9 305
07:15 AM 0 203 14 0 0 0 0 128 0 11 0 10 366
07:30 AM 0 260 13 0 0 0 2 216 0 9 0 9 509
07:45 AM 0 282 12 0 0 0 4 232 0 10 0 5 545
Total 0 914 43 0 0 0 8 687 0 40 0 33 1725
08:00 AM 0 234 12 0 0 0 5 212 0 12 0 6 481
08:15 AM 0 196 16 0 0 0 7 137 0 15 0 13 384
08:30 AM 0 176 16 0 0 0 5 164 0 6 0 10 377
08:45 AM 0 163 16 0 0 0 0 154 0 14 0 14 361
Total 0 769 60 0 0 0 17 667 0 47 0 43 1603
04:00 PM 0 280 16 0 0 0 5 256 0 28 0 9 594
04:15 PM 0 251 17 0 0 0 6 251 0 19 0 20 564
04:30 PM 0 289 16 0 0 0 8 249 0 17 0 19 598
04:45 PM 0 285 23 0 0 0 16 260 0 31 0 13 628
Total 0 1105 72 0 0 0 35 1016 0 95 0 61 2384
05:00 PM 0 299 21 0 0 0 9 264 0 24 0 17 634
05:15 PM 0 264 18 0 0 0 11 269 0 19 0 24 605
05:30 PM 0 276 28 0 0 0 3 263 0 24 0 22 616
05:45 PM 0 256 24 0 0 0 8 261 0 25 0 21 595
Total 0 1095 91 0 0 0 31 1057 0 92 0 84 2450
Grand Total 0 3883 266 0 0 0 91 3427 0 274 0 221 8162
Apprch % 0 93.6 6.4 0 0 0 2.6 97.4 0 55.4 0 44.6
Total % 0 47.6 3.3 0 0 0 1.1 42 0 3.4 0 2.7

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_TheMarketplaceDriveway
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound

Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
The Marketplace Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 260 13 273 0 0 0 0 2 216 0 218 9 0 9 18 509
07:45 AM 0 282 12 294 0 0 0 0 4 232 0 236 10 0 5 15 545 08:00 AM 0 234 12 246 0 0 0 0 5 212 0 217 12 0 6 18 481 08:15 AM 0 196 16 212 0 0 0 0 7 137 0 144 15 0 13 28 384 Total Volume 0 972 53 1025 0 0 0 0 18 797 0 815 46 0 33 79 1919 % App. Total 0 94.8 5.2 0 0 0 2.2 97.8 0 58.2 0 41.8
PHF .000 .862 .828 .872 .000 .000 .000 .000 .643 .859 .000 .863 .767 .000 .635 .705 .880 Rosemead Blvd
The Marketplace Driveway
Rosemead Blvd
Right
53 Thru
972
Left
0 Out In Total
843 1025 1868
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
18 Thru
797
Right
0 Out In Total
1005 815 1820
Left
46 Thru
0 Right
33 Total Out In
71 79 150
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_TheMarketplaceDriveway
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound

Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
The Marketplace Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 0 285 23 308 0 0 0 0 16 260 0 276 31 0 13 44 628 05:00 PM 0 299 21 320 0 0 0 0 9 264 0 273 24 0 17 41 634 05:15 PM 0 264 18 282 0 0 0 0 11 269 0 280 19 0 24 43 605 05:30 PM 0 276 28 304 0 0 0 0 3 263 0 266 24 0 22 46 616 Total Volume 0 1124 90 1214 0 0 0 0 39 1056 0 1095 98 0 76 174 2483 % App. Total 0 92.6 7.4 0 0 0 3.6 96.4 0 56.3 0 43.7
PHF .000 .940 .804 .948 .000 .000 .000 .000 .609 .981 .000 .978 .790 .000 .792 .946 .979 Rosemead Blvd
The Marketplace Driveway
Rosemead Blvd
Right
90 Thru
1124
Left
0 Out In Total
1154 1214 2368
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 Out Total In
0 0 0
Left
39 Thru
1056
Right
0 Out In Total
1200 1095 2295
Left
98 Thru
0 Right
76 Total Out In
129 174 303
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_TheMarketplaceDriveway_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound

Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
The Marketplace
Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3
07:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 6
07:45 AM 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 5
Total 1 2 0 1 0 0 5 5 14
08:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3
08:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 6
08:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 4
08:45 AM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 5
Total 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 9 18
04:00 PM 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
04:15 PM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 9
04:30 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 5
04:45 PM 0 2 2 0 0 0 3 3 10
Total 2 10 2 0 0 0 3 11 28
05:00 PM 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 5
05:15 PM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 9
05:30 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 4
05:45 PM 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
Total 0 9 2 4 0 0 0 6 21
Grand Total 3 27 4 7 0 0 9 31 81
Apprch % 10 90 36.4 63.6 0 0 22.5 77.5
Total % 3.7 33.3 4.9 8.6 0 0 11.1 38.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_TheMarketplaceDriveway_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 2
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound

Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
The Marketplace Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 2 5 6
07:45 AM 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 5
08:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3
08:15 AM 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 6
Total Volume 1 4 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 8 14 20
% App. Total 20 80 0 100 0 0 42.9 57.1
PHF .250 .500 .625 .000 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .500 .667 .700 .833 Rosemead Blvd
The Marketplace Driveway
Rosemead Blvd
Thru
1 Peds
4 Out In Total
0 5 5
Thru
0 Peds
1 Out Total In
6 1 7
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Thru
6 Peds
8 Total Out In
0 14 14
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : Rosemead_TheMarketplaceDriveway_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/1/2021
Page No : 3
Rosemead Blvd
Southbound

Westbound
Rosemead Blvd
Northbound
The Marketplace Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Bikes Peds App.Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 9
04:30 PM 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5
04:45 PM 0 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 3 3 6 10
05:00 PM 0 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 5
Total Volume 1 10 11 4 0 4 0 0 0 3 11 14 29
% App. Total 9.1 90.9 100 0 0 0 21.4 78.6
PHF .250 .833 .688 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .250 .550 .583 .725 Rosemead Blvd
The Marketplace Driveway
Rosemead Blvd
Thru
1 Peds
10 Out In Total
0 11 11
Thru
4 Peds
0 Out Total In
3 4 7
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out In Total
1 0 1
Thru
3 Peds
11 Total Out In
4 14 18
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4418-1 The Mercury Project

APPENDIX E

CAPCOA TDM STRATEGIES

VMT MITIGATION WORKSHEET

Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas
Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate
Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity
Designed for Local Governments, Communities,
and Project Developers
Final Draft
December 2021
©2021 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. All Rights Reserved.

Handbook for Analyzing GHG Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity MEASURES TO REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS | 31
Figure 3-1. Navigation Trees for Quantitative GHG Reduction Measures Measure: T‐1 Increase Residential Density
Utilized: Reduction Due to Increased Density 9.79%
Baseline Assumed in Model
Min 0.8%
Max 30.0%
Number of Housing Units or Jobs per Acre [1] 6.161290323 Unit Number of Housing Units Per Acre
A Percent Increase in Housing Units or Jobs per Acre (not to exceed 500%) N/A B Elasticity of VMT with respect to density N/A
VMT Reduction = A x B N/A
VMT Reduction Utilized N/A
With Project Implementation
Min 0.8%
Max 30.0%
Number of Housing Units or Jobs per Acre [2] 8.903225806 Unit Number of Housing Units Per Acre
A Percent Increase in Housing Units or Jobs per Acre (not to exceed 500%)[3] 45% B Elasticity of VMT with respect to density 0.22
VMT Reduction = A x B 9.79%
VMT Reduction Utilized 9.79%
[1] Based on number of housing units without the project and acreage of TAZ 21804400. [2] Derived from number of housing units with the project and acreage of TAZ 21804400. [3] Percentage increase in housing units per acre calculated based on housing units per acre in TAZ 21804400 without and with the project.

The Mercury Project - CAPCOA Worksheet.xlsm The Mercury 1-21-4418-1
Scenario 1
Measure: T‐4 Integrate Affordable and Below Market Rate Housing Utilized: Reduction Due to Affordable and Below Market Rate Housing 1.43% Baseline Assumed in Model
Min 0.00%
Max 28.6%
A Percentage of Units in Project that are Deed‐Restricted BMR Housing 0% VMT Reduction = 28.6% x A 0.00%
VMT Reduction Utilized 0.00%
With Project Implementation
Min 0.00%
Max 28.6%
A Percentage of Units in Project that are Deed‐Restricted BMR Housing 5% VMT Reduction = 28.6% x A 1.43%
VMT Reduction Utilized 1.43%
The Mercury Project - CAPCOA Worksheet.xlsm The Mercury 1-21-4418-1
Scenario 1
Measure: T‐15 Limit Residential Parking Supply
Utilized: Reduction Due to Limiting Parking Supply 3.84% Baseline Assumed in Model
Min 0.0%
Max 13.7%
Residential Parking Demand 0
Project Residential Parking Supply 0
VMT Reduction 0.00%
VMT Reduction Utilized 0.00%
With Project Implementation
Min 0.0%
Max 13.7%
Residential Parking Demand 542
Project Residential Parking Supply 390
VMT Reduction 3.84%
VMT Reduction Utilized 3.84%
The Mercury Project - CAPCOA Worksheet.xlsm The Mercury 1-21-4418-1
Scenario 1
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4418-1 The Mercury Project

APPENDIX F

ICU AND LEVELS OF SERVICE EXPLANATION
ICU DATA WORKSHEETS – WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOURS

INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) DESCRIPTION
Level of Service is a term used to describe prevailing conditions and their effect on traffic. Broadly interpreted, the Levels of Service concept denotes any one of a number of differing combinations of operating conditions which may occur as a roadway is accommodating various traffic volumes. Level of Service is a qualitative measure of the effect of such factors as travel speed, travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience.

Six Levels of Service, A through F, have been defined in the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board. Level of Service A describes a condition of free flow, with low traffic volumes and relatively high speeds, while Level of Service F describes forced traffic flow at low speeds with jammed conditions and queues which cannot clear during the green phases.

The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of intersection capacity analysis has been used in our studies. It directly relates traffic demand and available capacity for key intersection movements, regardless of present signal timing, The capacity per hour of green time for each approach is calculated based on the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual. The proportion of total signal time needed by each key movement is determined and compared to the total time available (100 percent of the hour). The result of summing the requirements of the conflicting key movements plus an allowance for clearance times is expressed as a decimal fraction. Conflicting key traffic movements are those opposing movements whose combined green time requirements are greatest.

The resulting ICU represents the proportion of the total hour required to accommodate intersection demand volumes if the key conflicting traffic movements are operating at capacity. Other movements may be operating near capacity, or may be operating at significantly better levels. The ICU may be translated to a Level of Service as tabulated below.

The Levels of Service (abbreviated from the Highway Capacity Manual) are listed here with their corresponding ICU and Load Factor equivalents. Load Factor is that proportion of the signal cycles during the peak hour which are fully loaded; i.e. when all of the vehicles waiting at the beginning of green are not able to clear on that green phase.

Intersection Capacity Utilization Characteristics
Level of Service Load Factor Equivalent ICU
A 0.0 0.00 - 0.60
B 0.0 - 0.1 0.61 - 0.70
C 0.1 - 0.3 0.71 - 0.80
D 0.3 - 0.7 0.81 - 0.90
E 0.7 - 1.0 0.91 - 1.00
F Not Applicable Not Applicable

SERVICE LEVEL A
There are no loaded cycles and few are even close to loaded at this service level. No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication.

SERVICE LEVEL B
This level represents stable operation where an occasional approach phase is fully utilized and a substantial number are approaching full use. Many drivers begin to feel restricted within platoons of vehicles.

SERVICE LEVEL C
At this level stable operation continues. Loading is still intermittent but more frequent than at Level B. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication and backups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted, but not objectionably so.

SERVICE LEVEL D
This level encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability at the intersection. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the peak hour, but enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of queues, thus preventing excessive backups. Drivers frequently have to wait through more than one red signal. This level is the lower limit of acceptable operation to most drivers.

SERVICE LEVEL E
This represents near capacity and capacity operation. At capacity (ICU = 1.0) it represents the most vehicles that the particular intersection can accommodate. However, full utilization of every signal cycle is seldom attained no matter how great the demand. At this level all drivers wait through more than one red signal, and frequently through several.

SERVICE LEVEL F
Jammed conditions. Traffic backed up from a downstream location on one of the street restricts or prevents movement of traffic through the intersection under consideration.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
600 S. Lake Avenue, Ste 500, Pasadena 91106
(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792.0941 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Paramount Boulevard @ Washington Boulevard
N-S St: Paramount Boulevard Peak hr: AM Date: 7/4/2022
E-W St: Washington Boulevard Annual Growth: 1.00% Existing Year: 2021 Project: The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Projection Year: 2024 File: ICU1
2021 EXISTING TRAFFIC 2021 EXISTING WITH PROJECT 2021 EXISTING W/ PROJECT + MITIGATION 2024 FUTURE PRE-PROJECT 2024 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Added Added
1 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Amb. Grow. Rel. Proj. Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio NB Left 214 2880 0.074 * 0 214 2880 0.074 * 0 214 2880 0.074 * 6 0 220 2880 0.076 * 0 220 2880 0.076 * NB Thru 319 3200 0.100 0 319 3200 0.100 0 319 3200 0.100 10 11 340 3200 0.106 0 340 3200 0.106 NB Right 108 1600 0.068 4 112 1600 0.070 0 112 1600 0.070 3 0 111 1600 0.069 4 115 1600 0.072 SB Left 86 2880 0.030 4 90 2880 0.031 0 90 2880 0.031 3 5 94 2880 0.033 4 98 2880 0.034 SB Thru 497 3200 0.223 * 0 497 3200 0.223 * 0 497 3200 0.223 * 15 10 522 3200 0.235 * 0 522 3200 0.235 * SB Right 218 0 0.000 0 218 0 0.000 0 218 0 0.000 7 5 230 0 0.000 0 230 0 0.000 EB Left 104 1600 0.065 0 104 1600 0.065 0 104 1600 0.065 3 8 115 1600 0.072 0 115 1600 0.072 EB Thru 747 4800 0.207 * 10 757 4800 0.209 * 0 757 4800 0.209 * 23 3 773 4800 0.214 * 10 783 4800 0.216 * EB Right 245 0 0.000 0 245 0 0.000 0 245 0 0.000 7 3 255 0 0.000 0 255 0 0.000 WB Left 131 1600 0.082 * 7 138 1600 0.086 * 0 138 1600 0.086 * 4 4 139 1600 0.087 * 7 146 1600 0.091 * WB Thru 959 4800 0.208 18 977 4800 0.213 0 977 4800 0.213 29 2 990 4800 0.216 18 1008 4800 0.221 WB Right 39 0 0.000 7 46 0 0.000 0 46 0 0.000 1 7 47 0 0.000 7 54 0 0.000 Yellow Allowance 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * ICU 0.736 0.743 0.743 0.762 0.769

LOS C C C C C
* Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU
1 Counts conducted by: City Traffic Counters
2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
600 S. Lake Avenue, Ste 500, Pasadena 91106
(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792.0941 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Paramount Boulevard @ Washington Boulevard
N-S St: Paramount Boulevard Peak hr: PM Date: 7/4/2022
E-W St: Washington Boulevard Annual Growth: 1.00% Existing Year: 2021 Project: The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Projection Year: 2024 File: ICU1
2021 EXISTING TRAFFIC 2021 EXISTING WITH PROJECT 2021 EXISTING W/ PROJECT + MITIGATION 2024 FUTURE PRE-PROJECT 2024 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Added Added
1 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Amb. Grow. Rel. Proj. Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio NB Left 341 2880 0.118 * 0 341 2880 0.118 * 0 341 2880 0.118 * 10 3 354 2880 0.123 * 0 354 2880 0.123 * NB Thru 734 3200 0.229 0 734 3200 0.229 0 734 3200 0.229 22 11 767 3200 0.240 0 767 3200 0.240 NB Right 146 1600 0.091 8 154 1600 0.096 0 154 1600 0.096 4 3 153 1600 0.096 8 161 1600 0.101 SB Left 180 2880 0.063 8 188 2880 0.065 0 188 2880 0.065 5 7 192 2880 0.067 8 200 2880 0.069 SB Thru 613 3200 0.237 * 0 613 3200 0.237 * 0 613 3200 0.237 * 19 11 643 3200 0.250 * 0 643 3200 0.250 * SB Right 146 0 0.000 0 146 0 0.000 0 146 0 0.000 4 8 158 0 0.000 0 158 0 0.000 EB Left 185 1600 0.116 0 185 1600 0.116 0 185 1600 0.116 6 7 198 1600 0.124 0 198 1600 0.124 EB Thru 1676 4800 0.408 * 20 1696 4800 0.412 * 0 1696 4800 0.412 * 51 4 1731 4800 0.421 * 20 1751 4800 0.425 * EB Right 281 0 0.000 0 281 0 0.000 0 281 0 0.000 9 1 291 0 0.000 0 291 0 0.000 WB Left 118 1600 0.074 * 5 123 1600 0.077 * 0 123 1600 0.077 * 4 0 122 1600 0.076 * 5 127 1600 0.079 * WB Thru 785 4800 0.188 14 799 4800 0.192 0 799 4800 0.192 24 4 813 4800 0.196 14 827 4800 0.200 WB Right 117 0 0.000 5 122 0 0.000 0 122 0 0.000 4 6 127 0 0.000 5 132 0 0.000 Yellow Allowance 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * ICU 0.987 0.994 0.994 1.021 1.028

LOS E E E F F
* Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU
1 Counts conducted by: City Traffic Counters
2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
600 S. Lake Avenue, Ste 500, Pasadena 91106
(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792.0941 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Crossway Drive @ Washington Boulevard
N-S St: Crossway Drive Peak hr: AM Date: 7/4/2022
E-W St: Washington Boulevard Annual Growth: 1.00% Existing Year: 2021 Project: The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Projection Year: 2024 File: ICU2
2021 EXISTING TRAFFIC 2021 EXISTING WITH PROJECT 2021 EXISTING W/ PROJECT + MITIGATION 2024 FUTURE PRE-PROJECT 2024 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Added Added
1 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Amb. Grow. Rel. Proj. Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio NB Left 37 0 0.023 * 0 37 0 0.023 * 0 37 0 0.023 * 1 0 38 0 0.024 * 0 38 0 0.024 * NB Thru 5 1600 0.026 0 5 1600 0.026 0 5 1600 0.026 0 0 5 1600 0.027 0 5 1600 0.027 NB Right 50 1600 0.031 0 50 1600 0.031 0 50 1600 0.031 2 0 52 1600 0.033 0 52 1600 0.033 SB Left 54 0 0.034 0 54 0 0.034 0 54 0 0.034 2 0 56 0 0.035 0 56 0 0.035 SB Thru 7 1600 0.046 * 0 7 1600 0.046 * 0 7 1600 0.046 * 0 0 7 1600 0.047 * 0 7 1600 0.047 * SB Right 12 0 0.000 0 12 0 0.000 0 12 0 0.000 0 0 12 0 0.000 0 12 0 0.000 EB Left 15 1600 0.009 * 0 15 1600 0.009 * 0 15 1600 0.009 * 0 0 15 1600 0.009 * 0 15 1600 0.009 * EB Thru 858 4800 0.179 18 876 4800 0.183 0 876 4800 0.183 26 8 892 4800 0.186 18 910 4800 0.190 EB Right 23 1600 0.014 0 23 1600 0.014 0 23 1600 0.014 1 0 24 1600 0.015 0 24 1600 0.015 WB Left 71 1600 0.044 11 82 1600 0.051 0 82 1600 0.051 2 0 73 1600 0.046 11 84 1600 0.053 WB Thru 1154 4800 0.243 * 32 1186 4800 0.249 * 0 1186 4800 0.249 * 35 13 1202 4800 0.253 * 32 1234 4800 0.259 * WB Right 10 0 0.000 0 10 0 0.000 0 10 0 0.000 0 0 10 0 0.000 0 10 0 0.000 Yellow Allowance 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * ICU 0.471 0.477 0.477 0.483 0.489

LOS A A A A A
* Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU
1 Counts conducted by: City Traffic Counters
2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
600 S. Lake Avenue, Ste 500, Pasadena 91106
(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792.0941 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Crossway Drive @ Washington Boulevard
N-S St: Crossway Drive Peak hr: PM Date: 7/4/2022
E-W St: Washington Boulevard Annual Growth: 1.00% Existing Year: 2021 Project: The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Projection Year: 2024 File: ICU2
2021 EXISTING TRAFFIC 2021 EXISTING WITH PROJECT 2021 EXISTING W/ PROJECT + MITIGATION 2024 FUTURE PRE-PROJECT 2024 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Added Added
1 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Amb. Grow. Rel. Proj. Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio NB Left 139 0 0.087 0 139 0 0.087 0 139 0 0.087 4 0 143 0 0.089 0 143 0 0.089 NB Thru 37 1600 0.110 * 0 37 1600 0.110 * 0 37 1600 0.110 * 1 0 38 1600 0.113 * 0 38 1600 0.113 * NB Right 133 1600 0.083 0 133 1600 0.083 0 133 1600 0.083 4 0 137 1600 0.086 0 137 1600 0.086 SB Left 69 0 0.043 * 0 69 0 0.043 * 0 69 0 0.043 * 2 0 71 0 0.044 * 0 71 0 0.044 * SB Thru 16 1600 0.063 0 16 1600 0.063 0 16 1600 0.063 0 0 16 1600 0.064 0 16 1600 0.064 SB Right 16 0 0.000 0 16 0 0.000 0 16 0 0.000 0 0 16 0 0.000 0 16 0 0.000 EB Left 109 1600 0.068 0 109 1600 0.068 0 109 1600 0.068 3 0 112 1600 0.070 0 112 1600 0.070 EB Thru 1469 4800 0.306 * 36 1505 4800 0.314 * 0 1505 4800 0.314 * 45 14 1528 4800 0.318 * 36 1564 4800 0.326 * EB Right 61 1600 0.038 0 61 1600 0.038 0 61 1600 0.038 2 0 63 1600 0.039 0 63 1600 0.039 WB Left 164 1600 0.103 * 8 172 1600 0.108 * 0 172 1600 0.108 * 5 0 169 1600 0.106 * 8 177 1600 0.111 * WB Thru 936 4800 0.205 24 960 4800 0.210 0 960 4800 0.210 28 10 974 4800 0.213 24 998 4800 0.218 WB Right 47 0 0.000 0 47 0 0.000 0 47 0 0.000 1 0 48 0 0.000 0 48 0 0.000 Yellow Allowance 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * ICU 0.712 0.724 0.724 0.731 0.744

LOS C C C C C
* Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU
1 Counts conducted by: City Traffic Counters
2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
600 S. Lake Avenue, Ste 500, Pasadena 91106
(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792.0941 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Rosemead Boulevard @ Coffman & Pico Road
N-S St: Rosemead Boulevard Peak hr: AM Date: 7/4/2022
E-W St: Coffman & Pico Road Annual Growth: 1.00% Existing Year: 2021 Project: The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Projection Year: 2024 File: ICU3
2021 EXISTING TRAFFIC 2021 EXISTING WITH PROJECT 2021 EXISTING W/ PROJECT + MITIGATION 2024 FUTURE PRE-PROJECT 2024 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Added Added
1 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Amb. Grow. Rel. Proj. Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio NB Left 16 1600 0.010 * 0 16 1600 0.010 * 0 16 1600 0.010 * 0 0 16 1600 0.010 * 0 16 1600 0.010 * NB Thru [3] 569 3200 0.178 11 580 3200 0.181 0 580 3200 0.181 17 13 599 3200 0.187 11 610 3200 0.191 NB Right 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 SB Left 10 1600 0.006 0 10 1600 0.006 0 10 1600 0.006 0 0 10 1600 0.006 0 10 1600 0.006 SB Thru [3] 922 3200 0.293 * 6 928 3200 0.294 * 0 928 3200 0.294 * 28 7 957 3200 0.303 * 6 963 3200 0.305 * SB Right 14 0 0.000 0 14 0 0.000 0 14 0 0.000 0 0 14 0 0.000 0 14 0 0.000 EB Left 17 0 0.011 0 17 0 0.011 0 17 0 0.011 1 0 18 0 0.011 0 18 0 0.011 EB Thru 0 1600 0.039 * 0 0 1600 0.039 * 0 0 1600 0.039 * 0 0 0 1600 0.040 * 0 0 1600 0.040 * EB Right 45 0 0.000 0 45 0 0.000 0 45 0 0.000 1 0 46 0 0.000 0 46 0 0.000 WB Left 6 0 0.004 * 0 6 0 0.004 * 0 6 0 0.004 * 0 0 6 0 0.004 * 0 6 0 0.004 * WB Thru 0 1600 0.009 0 0 1600 0.009 0 0 1600 0.009 0 0 0 1600 0.009 0 0 1600 0.009 WB Right 8 0 0.000 0 8 0 0.000 0 8 0 0.000 0 0 8 0 0.000 0 8 0 0.000 Yellow Allowance 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * ICU 0.495 0.497 0.497 0.507 0.509

LOS A A A A A
* Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU
1 Counts conducted by: City Traffic Counters
2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green
3 Northbound and southbound existing through movements were adjusted by 15% due to COVID-19 conditions.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
600 S. Lake Avenue, Ste 500, Pasadena 91106
(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792.0941 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Rosemead Boulevard @ Coffman & Pico Road
N-S St: Rosemead Boulevard Peak hr: PM Date: 7/4/2022
E-W St: Coffman & Pico Road Annual Growth: 1.00% Existing Year: 2021 Project: The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Projection Year: 2024 File: ICU3
2021 EXISTING TRAFFIC 2021 EXISTING WITH PROJECT 2021 EXISTING W/ PROJECT + MITIGATION 2024 FUTURE PRE-PROJECT 2024 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Added Added
1 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Amb. Grow. Rel. Proj. Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio NB Left 23 1600 0.014 0 23 1600 0.014 0 23 1600 0.014 1 0 24 1600 0.015 0 24 1600 0.015 NB Thru [3] 1251 3200 0.393 * 8 1259 3200 0.396 * 0 1259 3200 0.396 * 38 19 1308 3200 0.411 * 8 1316 3200 0.413 * NB Right 7 0 0.000 0 7 0 0.000 0 7 0 0.000 0 0 7 0 0.000 0 7 0 0.000 SB Left 18 1600 0.011 * 0 18 1600 0.011 * 0 18 1600 0.011 * 1 0 19 1600 0.012 * 0 19 1600 0.012 * SB Thru [3] 1106 3200 0.353 12 1118 3200 0.357 0 1118 3200 0.357 34 17 1157 3200 0.370 12 1169 3200 0.373 SB Right 25 0 0.000 0 25 0 0.000 0 25 0 0.000 1 0 26 0 0.000 0 26 0 0.000 EB Left 50 0 0.031 0 50 0 0.031 0 50 0 0.031 2 0 52 0 0.033 0 52 0 0.033 EB Thru 3 1600 0.048 * 0 3 1600 0.048 * 0 3 1600 0.048 * 0 0 3 1600 0.050 * 0 3 1600 0.050 * EB Right 24 0 0.000 0 24 0 0.000 0 24 0 0.000 1 0 25 0 0.000 0 25 0 0.000 WB Left 7 0 0.004 * 0 7 0 0.004 * 0 7 0 0.004 * 0 0 7 0 0.004 * 0 7 0 0.004 * WB Thru 0 1600 0.013 0 0 1600 0.013 0 0 1600 0.013 0 0 0 1600 0.013 0 0 1600 0.013 WB Right 14 0 0.000 0 14 0 0.000 0 14 0 0.000 0 0 14 0 0.000 0 14 0 0.000 Yellow Allowance 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * ICU 0.607 0.609 0.609 0.627 0.630

LOS B B B B B
* Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU
1 Counts conducted by: City Traffic Counters
2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green
3 Northbound and southbound existing through movements were adjusted by 15% due to COVID-19 conditions.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
600 S. Lake Avenue, Ste 500, Pasadena 91106
(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792.0941 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Rosemead Boulevard @ Washington Boulevard
N-S St: Rosemead Boulevard Peak hr: AM Date: 7/4/2022
E-W St: Washington Boulevard Annual Growth: 1.00% Existing Year: 2021 Project: The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Projection Year: 2024 File: ICU4
2021 EXISTING TRAFFIC 2021 EXISTING WITH PROJECT 2021 EXISTING W/ PROJECT + MITIGATION 2024 FUTURE PRE-PROJECT 2024 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Added Added
1 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Amb. Grow. Rel. Proj. Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio NB Left 80 1600 0.050 * 6 86 1600 0.054 * 0 86 1600 0.054 * 2 2 84 1600 0.053 * 6 90 1600 0.056 * NB Thru [3] 369 4800 0.092 0 369 4800 0.092 0 369 4800 0.092 11 13 393 4800 0.097 0 393 4800 0.097 NB Right 71 0 0.000 0 71 0 0.000 0 71 0 0.000 2 0 73 0 0.000 0 73 0 0.000 SB Left 151 1600 0.094 18 169 1600 0.106 0 169 1600 0.106 5 0 156 1600 0.098 18 174 1600 0.109 SB Thru [3] 647 4800 0.165 * 0 647 4800 0.165 * 0 647 4800 0.165 * 20 7 674 4800 0.171 * 0 674 4800 0.172 * SB Right 144 0 0.000 2 146 0 0.000 0 146 0 0.000 4 0 148 0 0.000 2 150 0 0.000 EB Left 111 1600 0.069 * 0 111 1600 0.069 * 0 111 1600 0.069 * 3 0 114 1600 0.071 * 0 114 1600 0.071 * EB Thru 731 4800 0.152 0 731 4800 0.152 0 731 4800 0.152 22 7 760 4800 0.158 0 760 4800 0.158 EB Right [4] 87 1600 0.004 11 98 1600 0.008 0 98 1600 0.008 3 1 91 1600 0.004 11 102 1600 0.008 WB Left 188 1600 0.118 0 188 1600 0.118 0 188 1600 0.118 6 0 194 1600 0.121 0 194 1600 0.121 WB Thru 941 4800 0.215 * 10 951 4800 0.217 * 0 951 4800 0.217 * 29 11 981 4800 0.224 * 10 991 4800 0.226 * WB Right 89 0 0.000 0 89 0 0.000 0 89 0 0.000 3 0 92 0 0.000 0 92 0 0.000 Yellow Allowance 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * ICU 0.649 0.655 0.655 0.669 0.675

LOS B B B B B
* Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU
1 Counts conducted by: City Traffic Counters
2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green
3 Northbound and southbound existing through movements were adjusted by 15% due to COVID-19 conditions. 4 The eastbound right-turn lane has an overlapping phase with the northbound left-turn phase.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
600 S. Lake Avenue, Ste 500, Pasadena 91106
(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792.0941 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Rosemead Boulevard @ Washington Boulevard
N-S St: Rosemead Boulevard Peak hr: PM Date: 7/4/2022
E-W St: Washington Boulevard Annual Growth: 1.00% Existing Year: 2021 Project: The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Projection Year: 2024 File: ICU4
2021 EXISTING TRAFFIC 2021 EXISTING WITH PROJECT 2021 EXISTING W/ PROJECT + MITIGATION 2024 FUTURE PRE-PROJECT 2024 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Added Added
1 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Amb. Grow. Rel. Proj. Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio NB Left 113 1600 0.071 * 12 125 1600 0.078 * 0 125 1600 0.078 * 3 2 118 1600 0.074 * 12 130 1600 0.081 * NB Thru [3] 685 4800 0.176 0 685 4800 0.176 0 685 4800 0.176 21 19 725 4800 0.185 0 725 4800 0.185 NB Right 158 0 0.000 0 158 0 0.000 0 158 0 0.000 5 0 163 0 0.000 0 163 0 0.000 SB Left 132 1600 0.083 14 146 1600 0.091 0 146 1600 0.091 4 0 136 1600 0.085 14 150 1600 0.094 SB Thru [3] 823 4800 0.200 * 0 823 4800 0.201 * 0 823 4800 0.201 * 25 17 865 4800 0.210 * 0 865 4800 0.211 * SB Right 138 0 0.000 4 142 0 0.000 0 142 0 0.000 4 0 142 0 0.000 4 146 0 0.000 EB Left 261 1600 0.163 * 0 261 1600 0.163 * 0 261 1600 0.163 * 8 0 269 1600 0.168 * 0 269 1600 0.168 * EB Thru 1055 4800 0.220 0 1055 4800 0.220 0 1055 4800 0.220 32 11 1098 4800 0.229 0 1098 4800 0.229 EB Right [4] 204 1600 0.057 8 212 1600 0.054 0 212 1600 0.054 6 3 213 1600 0.059 8 221 1600 0.057 WB Left 209 1600 0.131 0 209 1600 0.131 0 209 1600 0.131 6 0 215 1600 0.134 0 215 1600 0.134 WB Thru 785 4800 0.203 * 20 805 4800 0.207 * 0 805 4800 0.207 * 24 8 817 4800 0.210 * 20 837 4800 0.215 * WB Right 187 0 0.000 0 187 0 0.000 0 187 0 0.000 6 0 193 0 0.000 0 193 0 0.000 Yellow Allowance 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * 0.150 * ICU 0.786 0.799 0.799 0.812 0.825

LOS C C C D D
* Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU
1 Counts conducted by: City Traffic Counters
2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green
3 Northbound and southbound existing through movements were adjusted by 15% due to COVID-19 conditions. 4 The eastbound right-turn lane has an overlapping phase with the northbound left-turn phase.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4418-1 The Mercury Project

APPENDIX G

SYNCHRO ANALYSIS DATA
SYNCHRO ANALYSIS DATA WORKSHEETS – WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOURS HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
5: Washington Blvd & Site Dwy Weekday AM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 55 932 1310 13 0 37
Future Vol, veh/h 55 932 1310 13 0 37
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 130 - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 60 1013 1424 14 0 40
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1438 0 - 0 - 719
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy 5.34 ---- 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 ---- 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 239 - - - 0 318
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 239 - - - - 318
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 18

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 239 - - - 318
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.25 - - - 0.126
HCM Control Delay (s) 25 - - - 18
HCM Lane LOS D - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - - - 0.4
HCM 2010 TWSC Existing Conditions
5: Washington Blvd & Site Dwy Weekday PM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 108 1598 1098 12 0 67
Future Vol, veh/h 108 1598 1098 12 0 67
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 130 - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 117 1737 1193 13 0 73
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1206 0 - 0 - 603
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy 5.34 ---- 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 ---- 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 311 - - - 0 379
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 311 - - - - 379
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 0 16.7

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 311 - - - 379
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.377 - - - 0.192
HCM Control Delay (s) 23.4 - - - 16.7
HCM Lane LOS C - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.7 - - - 0.7
HCM 2010 TWSC Future Without Project Conditions
5: Washington Blvd & Site Dwy Weekday AM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 57 968 1363 13 0 38
Future Vol, veh/h 57 968 1363 13 0 38
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 130 - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 62 1052 1482 14 0 41
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1496 0 - 0 - 748
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy 5.34 ---- 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 ---- 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 224 - - - 0 305
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 224 - - - - 305
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 0 18.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 224 - - - 305
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.277 - - - 0.135
HCM Control Delay (s) 27.1 - - - 18.6
HCM Lane LOS D - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 - - - 0.5
HCM 6th TWSC Future Without Project Conditions
5: Washington Blvd & Site Dwy Weekday PM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 111 1660 1141 12 0 69
Future Vol, veh/h 111 1660 1141 12 0 69
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 130 - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 121 1804 1240 13 0 75
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1253 0 - 0 - 627
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy 5.34 ---- 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 ---- 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 295 - - - 0 365
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 295 - - - - 365
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.6 0 17.4

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 295 - - - 365
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.409 - - - 0.205
HCM Control Delay (s) 25.4 - - - 17.4
HCM Lane LOS D - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 - - - 0.8
HCM 6th TWSC Future With Project Conditions
5: Washington Blvd & Site Dwy Weekday AM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 75 979 1363 31 0 80
Future Vol, veh/h 75 979 1363 31 0 80
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 130 - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 82 1064 1482 34 0 87
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1516 0 - 0 - 758
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy 5.34 ---- 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 ---- 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 219 - - - 0 300
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 219 - - - - 300
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.2 0 21.8

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 219 - - - 300
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.372 - - - 0.29
HCM Control Delay (s) 30.9 - - - 21.8
HCM Lane LOS D - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.6 - - - 1.2
HCM 6th TWSC Future With Project Conditions
5: Washington Blvd & Site Dwy Weekday PM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 147 1668 1141 48 0 100
Future Vol, veh/h 147 1668 1141 48 0 100
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 130 - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 160 1813 1240 52 0 109
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1292 0 - 0 - 646
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy 5.34 ---- 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 ---- 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 282 - - - 0 355
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 282 - - - - 355
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.7 0 19.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 282 - - - 355
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.567 - - - 0.306
HCM Control Delay (s) 33.2 - - - 19.6
HCM Lane LOS D - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.2 - - - 1.3
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 6: Rosemead Blvd & Marketplace Weekday AM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 33 18 797 972 53
Future Volume (veh/h) 46 33 18 797 972 53
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1945 1870 1870 1945
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 50 36 20 866 1057 58
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 65 47 465 4257 2609 143
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.83 0.76 0.76
Sat Flow, veh/h 974 702 1853 5274 3519 188
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 87 0 20 866 548 567
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1695 0 1853 1702 1777 1837
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 0.0 0.2 3.1 9.6 9.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 0.2 3.1 9.6 9.6
Prop In Lane 0.57 0.41 1.00 0.10
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 112 0 465 4257 1354 1399
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.04 0.20 0.40 0.41
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 480 0 538 4257 1354 1399
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.3 0.0 2.5 1.5 3.7 3.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.9
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 4.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 4.4 4.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.0 0.0 2.5 1.6 4.6 4.6
LnGrp LOS D AAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 87 886 1115
Approach Delay, s/veh 52.0 1.6 4.6
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 79.5 10.5 6.5 73.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 55.5 25.5 5.5 45.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 6.5 2.2 11.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.2 0.2 0.0 4.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.3
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 6: Rosemead Blvd & Marketplace Weekday PM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 98 76 39 1056 1124 90
Future Volume (veh/h) 98 76 39 1056 1124 90
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1945 1870 1870 1945
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 107 83 42 1148 1222 98
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 129 100 359 3900 2258 181
Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.76 0.68 0.68
Sat Flow, veh/h 947 735 1853 5274 3426 267
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 191 0 42 1148 651 669
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1691 0 1853 1702 1777 1822
Q Serve(g_s), s 9.9 0.0 0.6 6.2 16.8 16.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.9 0.0 0.6 6.2 16.8 16.8
Prop In Lane 0.56 0.43 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 230 0 359 3900 1204 1235
V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.00 0.12 0.29 0.54 0.54
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 479 0 405 3900 1204 1235
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.9 0.0 5.4 3.2 7.4 7.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.7 1.7
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 8.1 0.0 0.3 2.4 9.2 9.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.3 0.0 5.5 3.4 9.1 9.1
LnGrp LOS D AAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 191 1190 1320
Approach Delay, s/veh 45.3 3.5 9.1
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 73.2 16.8 7.8 65.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 55.5 25.5 5.5 45.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.2 11.9 2.6 18.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.0 0.5 0.0 6.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.2
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future Without Project Conditions 6: Rosemead Blvd & Marketplace Weekday AM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 47 34 19 834 1008 55
Future Volume (veh/h) 47 34 19 834 1008 55
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1945 1870 1870 1945
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 51 37 21 907 1096 60
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 66 48 449 4249 2602 142
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.83 0.76 0.76
Sat Flow, veh/h 971 705 1853 5274 3519 187
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 89 0 21 907 568 588
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1695 0 1853 1702 1777 1837
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 0.0 0.2 3.3 10.2 10.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.6 0.0 0.2 3.3 10.2 10.2
Prop In Lane 0.57 0.42 1.00 0.10
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 115 0 449 4249 1349 1395
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.05 0.21 0.42 0.42
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 480 0 520 4249 1349 1395
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.3 0.0 2.6 1.5 3.8 3.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.9
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 4.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 4.7 4.8
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.8 0.0 2.6 1.7 4.8 4.8
LnGrp LOS D AAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 89 928 1156
Approach Delay, s/veh 51.8 1.7 4.8
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 79.4 10.6 6.5 72.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 55.5 25.5 5.5 45.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 6.6 2.2 12.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.4 0.2 0.0 5.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.4
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future Without Project Conditions 6: Rosemead Blvd & Marketplace Weekday PM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 101 78 40 1107 1175 93
Future Volume (veh/h) 101 78 40 1107 1175 93
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1945 1870 1870 1945
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 110 85 43 1203 1277 101
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 132 102 341 3884 2249 177
Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.76 0.67 0.67
Sat Flow, veh/h 949 733 1853 5274 3430 263
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 196 0 43 1203 679 699
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1691 0 1853 1702 1777 1823
Q Serve(g_s), s 10.2 0.0 0.6 6.6 18.1 18.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.2 0.0 0.6 6.6 18.1 18.3
Prop In Lane 0.56 0.43 1.00 0.14
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 235 0 341 3884 1198 1229
V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.57 0.57
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 479 0 386 3884 1198 1229
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.7 0.0 5.8 3.4 7.7 7.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.5 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.9 1.9
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 8.2 0.0 0.3 2.6 9.9 10.2
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.2 0.0 6.0 3.6 9.7 9.7
LnGrp LOS D AAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 196 1246 1378
Approach Delay, s/veh 45.2 3.7 9.7
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 73.0 17.0 7.8 65.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 55.5 25.5 5.5 45.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 12.2 2.6 20.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.4 0.5 0.0 6.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Conditions 6: Rosemead Blvd & Marketplace Weekday AM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 58 52 19 834 1010 59
Future Volume (veh/h) 58 52 19 834 1010 59
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1945 1870 1870 1945
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 63 57 21 907 1098 64
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 80 72 429 4130 2512 146
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.02 0.81 0.74 0.74
Sat Flow, veh/h 877 793 1853 5274 3506 199
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 121 0 21 907 572 590
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1684 0 1853 1702 1777 1835
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.3 0.0 0.2 3.7 11.3 11.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.3 0.0 0.2 3.7 11.3 11.3
Prop In Lane 0.52 0.47 1.00 0.11
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 153 0 429 4130 1308 1351
V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.05 0.22 0.44 0.44
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 477 0 500 4130 1308 1351
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.1 0.0 3.2 2.0 4.6 4.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 1.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 5.4 0.0 0.1 1.0 5.6 5.8
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.7 0.0 3.2 2.1 5.7 5.6
LnGrp LOS D AAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 121 928 1162
Approach Delay, s/veh 48.7 2.1 5.7
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 77.3 12.7 6.5 70.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 55.5 25.5 5.5 45.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.7 8.3 2.2 13.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.4 0.3 0.0 5.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Conditions 6: Rosemead Blvd & Marketplace Weekday PM Peak Hour
The Mercury Project/1-21-4418-1 Synchro 11 Report
LLG Engineers Page 1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 109 91 40 1107 1179 101
Future Volume (veh/h) 109 91 40 1107 1179 101
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1945 1870 1870 1945
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 118 99 43 1203 1282 110
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 140 117 327 3814 2188 187
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.75 0.66 0.66
Sat Flow, veh/h 913 766 1853 5274 3406 283
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 218 0 43 1203 686 706
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1687 0 1853 1702 1777 1819
Q Serve(g_s), s 11.3 0.0 0.6 7.0 19.2 19.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.3 0.0 0.6 7.0 19.2 19.4
Prop In Lane 0.54 0.45 1.00 0.16
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 258 0 327 3814 1173 1201
V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.00 0.13 0.32 0.58 0.59
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 478 0 373 3814 1173 1201
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.1 0.0 6.5 3.8 8.5 8.5
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 2.1 2.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 8.9 0.0 0.3 3.0 10.6 10.8
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.5 0.0 6.7 4.0 10.6 10.6
LnGrp LOS D AAABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 218 1246 1392
Approach Delay, s/veh 44.5 4.1 10.6
Approach LOS D A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 71.7 18.3 7.8 63.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 55.5 25.5 5.5 45.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.0 13.3 2.6 21.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.4 0.5 0.0 6.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

July 2022 | Initial Study

THE MERCURY PROJECT
City of Pico Rivera
Prepared for:

City of Pico Rivera
Contact: Julia Gonzalez, Deputy Director
Community & Economic Development
6615 Passons Boulevard
Pico Rivera, California 90660
562.942.2000
[email protected]
Prepared by:

PlaceWorks
Contact: Addie Farrell, Principal
700 S. Flower Street, Suite 600
Los Angeles, California 90017
213.623.1443
[email protected]
www.placeworks.com
ENCLOSURE 15
1o

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A
Table of Contents
July 2022 Page i
Section Page

1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1

1.1 PROJECT LOCATION...................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING..................................................................................................... 1

1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................. 11

2. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ..................................................................................35

2.1 PROJECT INFORMATION........................................................................................................... 35

2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED.......................................... 38

2.3 DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY)........................ 38

2.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS............................................................... 39

3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.....................................................................................47

3.1 AESTHETICS .................................................................................................................................... 47

3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES.................................................................. 49

3.3 AIR QUALITY................................................................................................................................... 51

3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES......................................................................................................... 58

3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................. 60

3.6 ENERGY............................................................................................................................................. 62

3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS................................................................................................................ 66

3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ............................................................................................. 70

3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ....................................................................... 73

3.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.................................................................................. 76

3.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING..................................................................................................... 81

3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES................................................................................................................ 84

3.13 NOISE.................................................................................................................................................. 85

3.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING................................................................................................. 95

3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES.......................................................................................................................... 97

3.16 RECREATION ................................................................................................................................ 105

3.17 TRANSPORTATION..................................................................................................................... 107

3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES........................................................................................... 112

3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS..................................................................................... 117

3.20 WILDFIRE........................................................................................................................................ 121

3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE................................................................. 122

4. REFERENCES............................................................................................................124

5. LIST OF PREPARERS................................................................................................128 CITY OF PICO RIVERA (LEAD AGENCY)......................................................................................... 128 PLACEWORKS .............................................................................................................................................. 128

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A
Table of Contents
Page ii PlaceWorks

APPENDICES
Appendix A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analyses
Appendix B Geotechnical Engineering Investigation
Appendix C Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report Appendix D Noise and Vibration Analysis
Appendix E Service Provider Letters and Responses
Appendix F Transportation Impact Analysis Report
Appendix G Tribal Consultation

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A
Table of Contents
July 2022 Page iii
List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure 1 Regional Location................................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 2 Local Vicinity......................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3 Aerial Photograph................................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 4 Site Plan…….......................................................................................................................................13 Figure 5 Open Space Plan.................................................................................................................................15 Figure 6 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access within the Project Site..................................................................21 Figure 7 Articulation Concepts ........................................................................................................................23 Figure 8 Proposed Setbacks..............................................................................................................................25 Figure 9 Walls and Screening Concept............................................................................................................27 Figure 10 Landscape concept .............................................................................................................................29 Figure 11 Public Services Near the Project Site.............................................................................................103 List of Tables
Table Page
Table 1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................................11 Table 2 Summary of Residential Uses............................................................................................................12 Table 3 Residential Population........................................................................................................................12 Table 4 Summary of Parking Spaces..............................................................................................................19 Table 5 Maximum Daily Regional Construction Emissions......................................................................53 Table 6 Maximum Daily Regional Construction Emissions with Mitigation Incorporated .................54 Table 7 Maximum Daily Regional Operation Emissions...........................................................................55 Table 8 Localized Construction Emissions...................................................................................................56 Table 9 Construction-Related Fuel Usage.....................................................................................................63 Table 10 Electricity Consumption....................................................................................................................64 Table 11 Natural Gas Consumption ................................................................................................................65

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A
Table of Contents
Page iv PlaceWorks
Table 12 Project Annual Operation-Related Fuel Usage..............................................................................65 Table 13 Project-Related Operation GHG Emissions..................................................................................72 Table 14 Maximum Allowable Environmental Noise Standards ................................................................87 Table 15 Groundborne Vibration Impact Criteria for Vibration Annoyance...........................................87 Table 16 Project-Related Construction Noise, Leq dBA................................................................................89 Table 17 Project-Related Traffic Noise Increase ...........................................................................................92 Table 18 Vibration Levels for Typical Construction Equipment................................................................94 Table 19 Vibration Levels for Typical Construction Equipment................................................................95 Table 20 Population and Housing Growth Projections for the City of Pico Rivera................................96 Table 21 Schools Serving the Project Site .......................................................................................................99 Table 22 New Student Generation Summary.................................................................................................99 Table 23 City and County Parks near the Project Site.................................................................................106

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A
Abbreviations and Acronyms
July 2022 Page v
AAQS ambient air quality standards
AB Assembly Bill
ACM asbestos-containing materials
ADT average daily traffic
amsl above mean sea level
AQMP air quality management plan
ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials
AST aboveground storage tank
BAU business as usual
bgs below ground surface
BMP best management practices
CAA Clean Air Act
CAFE corporate average fuel economy
CalARP California Accidental Release Prevention Program CalEMA California Emergency Management Agency
Cal/EPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code
Cal/OSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Administration CalRecycle California Department of Resources, Recycling, and Recovery Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CBC California Building Code
CCAA California Clean Air Act
CCR California Code of Regulations
CDE California Department of Education
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act cfs cubic feet per second
CGP Construction General Permit
CGS California Geologic Survey
CMP congestion management program
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNEL community noise equivalent level

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Page vi PlaceWorks
CO carbon monoxide
CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent
Corps US Army Corps of Engineers
CSO combined sewer overflows
CUPA Certified Unified Program Agency
CWA Clean Water Act
dB decibel
dBA A-weighted decibel
DOC California Department of Conservation
DPM diesel particulate matter
DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control
EIR environmental impact report
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act ESA Environmental Site Assessment
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GHG greenhouse gases
gpd gallons per day
GWP global warming potential
HCM Highway Capacity Manual
HQTA high quality transit area
HVAC heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system
in/sec inches per second
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Ldn day-night noise level
Leq equivalent continuous noise level
LACSD Los Angeles County Sanitation District
LBP lead-based paint
LCFS low-carbon fuel standard
LID low-impact development

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A
Abbreviations and Acronyms
July 2022 Page vii
LOS level of service
LST localized significance thresholds
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MW moment magnitude
MCL maximum contaminant level
MEP maximum extent practicable
mgd million gallons per day
MMT million metric tons
MPO metropolitan planning organization
MT metric ton
MWD Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NOX nitrogen oxides
NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
O3 ozone
OES California Office of Emergency Services
OSHA United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration PM particulate matter
POTW publicly owned treatment works
ppm parts per million
PPV peak particle velocity
RCNM Roadway Construction Noise Model
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
REC recognized environmental condition
RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment
RMP risk management plan
RMS root mean square
RPS renewable portfolio standard
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SB Senate Bill
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCE Southern California Edison

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Page viii PlaceWorks
SIP state implementation plan
SLM sound level meter
SoCAB South Coast Air Basin
SoCalGas Southern California Gas
SOX sulfur oxides
SQMP stormwater quality management plan
SRA source receptor area [or state responsibility area] SUSMP standard urban stormwater mitigation plan
SWP State Water Project
SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TAC toxic air contaminants
TDM transportation demand management
TNM transportation noise model
tpd tons per day
TRI toxic release inventory
TTCP traditional tribal cultural places
USDOT United States Department of Transportation
USGS United States Geological Survey
UST underground storage tank
UWMP urban water management plan
V/C volume-to-capacity ratio
VdB velocity decibels
VHFHSZ very high fire hazard severity zone
VMT vehicle miles traveled
VOC volatile organic compound
WQMP water quality management plan
WRD Water Replenishment District of Southern California WSA water supply assessment
July 2022 Page 1

1. Introduction
The project applicant, Mercury Bowl, LLC: Green Rivera, LLC, is seeking approval from the city of Pico Rivera for implementation of The Mercury Specific Plan (Specific Plan) that includes the development of a three to six-story mixed-use building with a 6.5-level parking structure in the core, including 1 level of subterranean parking, ground-floor retail and residential uses, and residential uses in floors two through six (proposed project) on a 2.85-acre site in Pico Rivera.

In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the city of Pico Rivera, as lead agency, is preparing the environmental documentation for the proposed project to determine if approval of the requested discretionary actions and subsequent development would have a significant impact on the environment. As defined by Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, an initial study is prepared primarily to provide the lead agency with information to use as the basis for determining whether an environmental impact report, negative declaration (ND), or mitigated negative declaration (MND) would provide the necessary environmental documentation and clearance for the proposed project. This initial study has been prepared to support the adoption of an MND.

1.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located at 8825 Washington Boulevard (APN: 6370-027-018) in the central part of Pico Rivera, Los Angeles County, California (see Figure 1, Regional Location). The project site in the city of Pico Rivera is surrounded by the city of Downey to the south, city of Montebello to the west, and city of Santa Fe Springs to the southeast. Regional access to the project site is via Interstate 605 (I-605), the San Gabriel River Freeway,

1.2 miles to the east, and Interstate 5 (I-5)/ Santa Ana Freeway, 2.0 miles to the south (see Figure 2, Local Vicinity). Rosemead Boulevard also provides regional access and is located approximately 500 feet to the east.

The project site is bounded by Washington Boulevard to the south and adjacent commercial uses to the north, east, and west. A single-family residential neighborhood borders the project site to the northwest (see Figure 3, Aerial Photograph).

1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

1.2.1 Existing Land Use and Zoning
The 2.85 acres project site is currently vacant and fenced off with no public access. It was previously developed with a commercial building that operated as a nightclub until March 2015 and was subsequently demolished in 2020. The project site is paved and contains ornamental landscaping, including palm trees.

The proposed project would be adjacent to, and become part of the Pico Rivera Marketplace, a larger commercial site with a broad range of retail services including a fitness center, restaurants, and bank. The project site is currently zoned General Commercial (C-G) with a general plan land use designation of Mixed-

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

Use/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8 (the Rosemead Boulevard and Washington Boulevard Opportunity Area) (Pico Rivera 2014). The housing element identifies adequate sites within the city that would be able to accommodate the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The project site is within the housing element’s Area 11 with a proposed zoning of Mixed-Use (Pico Rivera 2041b).

1.2.2 Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
The project site is primarily surrounded by commercial and residential uses and is separated from the residential uses by a block wall (see Figure 3). The Pico Rivera Marketplace, which is currently owned by the project applicant, borders the site to the north and east; a single-family residential neighborhood borders to the northwest; and commercial uses border to the west and south across Washington Boulevard. The commercial properties immediately bordering the project site to the east and west are zoned General Commercial, and the commercial uses across Washington Boulevard are zoned Specific Plan (Pico Rivera 2021). The Pico Rivera Marketplace has a general plan land use designation of Commercial, and the commercial uses to the west of the project site along Washington Boulevard have a general plan land use designation of Mixed-Use/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8. Commercial uses to the south of the project site have a general plan land use designation of Specific Plan (Pico Rivera 2014). The single-family neighborhood to the northwest is zoned Single-Family Residential (S-F) with a general plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (Pico Rivera 2021, 2014).

1.2.3 Local and Regional Access
Regional access to the project site is provided by I-605 and I-5, approximately 1.2 miles to the east and 2 miles to the south, respectively. Rosemead Boulevard also provides regional access and is located approximately 500 feet to the east. Washington Boulevard provides direct access to the project site from the south. One driveway from Washington Boulevard leads directly to the project site, and two vehicle access points along the northeastern and eastern boundary of the project site provide access from the Pico Rivera Marketplace property. The curb cut for the existing westerly driveway on Washington Boulevard would remain; however, no vehicle access would be provided from this driveway.

The Montebello/Commerce Metrolink Station is approximately 2 miles northwest connecting downtown Los Angeles and Riverside counties, and the Commerce Metrolink Station is approximately 2.6 miles west connecting downtown Los Angeles and Orange counties. Local bus service is provided along Rosemead Boulevard and Paramount Boulevard (LA Metro bus lines 266 and 265, respectively). Montebello Bus Line, Route 50, also runs along Washington Boulevard in the vicinity of the project site. The closest Route 50 and bus stop line 266 to the project site are located on the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Rosemead Boulevard, approximately 460 feet to the east. The closest bus stop line 265 is located on the intersection of Washington Boulevard and Paramount Boulevard, approximately 0.4 miles to the west. None of these bus lines provide 15-minute headways during peak hours.

Regional bike paths are located along the San Gabriel River, approximately one mile east of the project site, and along the Rio Hondo Channel, approximately 0.8 mile west of the project site. Based on the City’s

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction
July 2022 Page 3
circulation element, Rosemead Boulevard and Washington Boulevard are identified as proposed Class II bike lane and proposed Class III bike route, respectively (Pico Rivera 2014c).

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

PlaceWorks
Figure 1 - Regional Location

THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Source: ESRI, 2021
0 Scale (Miles)
3 Note: Unincorporated county areas are shown in white.

Project Site
County of Los Angeles
County of Orange County

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

PlaceWorks
Figure 2 - Local Vicinity
Source: ESRI, 2021
0 Scale (Feet)
2,000
5 605
Project Boundary
San Gabriel River
Rio Hondo
Pico Rivera
Montebello
Downey
Santa Fe
Springs
City Boundary

THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

PlaceWorks
Figure 3 - Aerial Photograph
Source: Nearmap, 2021
0 Scale (Feet)
135 Project Boundary
E Washington Blvd
Carron Dr
Goodbee St
Birchleaf Ave
Crossway Dr
Guild Dr
Residential
Wells Fargo
Bank
Commercial
LA Fitness
McDonalds
Chilli’s
Bar & Grill
Pico Rivera
Marketplace
Pico Rivera Towne Center

THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction
July 2022 Page 11

1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1.3.1 Proposed Land Uses
The proposed development as defined in the Specific Plan includes a three to six-story mixed-use building with subterranean parking, ground-floor retail and residential uses, and residential uses in floors two through six (see Figure 4, Site Plan).

The building would have a wrap-style design, i.e., the commercial space and apartments “wrap” around the internal parking structure (see Figure 5, Site Plan). As shown in Table 1, Project Summary, the proposed project would develop 255 dwelling units consisting of a mix of studios, one-bedrooms, two-bedrooms, and threebedrooms; up to 5,730 square feet of retail; up to 1,750 square feet of ground-floor lobby/leasing space; up to 17,010 square feet of rooftop pool/community recreation; and up to 190,000 square feet of parking. The first floor of the proposed building is a mix of retail, residential, public seating areas, and a main lobby/leasing office. Floors two through six include residential units, parking, and related residential amenities such as a small flex amenity space for residents. Parking levels would extend from all floors interior to the building and one level of subterranean parking. The roof deck of the parking structure would include a pool and recreation facilities such as a gym and clubhouse for use by residents only. Detailed descriptions for each of these uses are provided below.

Table 1 Project Summary
Proposed Uses Units/Square Feet Floor(s)
Residential (Studio, one-bedrooms, twobedrooms, and three-bedrooms) 255 units (13 affordable units) Floors 1-6
Retail 5,730 square feet Floor 1 (Ground Floor)
Lobby & Leasing Office 1,750 square feet Floor 1 (Ground Floor) Residential recreational Amenities 17,010 square feet Rooftop Pool/Community Recreation Parking 190,000 square feet Floors 1-6 & Subterranean 1 Level

1.3.1.1 RESIDENTIAL
Residential uses consist of studio, junior studio, one, two and three-bedroom apartments for rent, ranging in size from studios with balconies equaling approximately 540 square feet, to three-bedroom apartments with balconies equaling approximately 1,500 square feet as shown in Table 2, Summary of Residential Uses. Thirteen units would be dedicated as affordable. Approximately 258,720 square feet of residential uses is proposed.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

Table 2 Summary of Residential Uses
Unit Type Square Feet Number of Units
Studio 540 35
Junior One-Bedroom 570 48
One-Bedroom 590-620 111
Two-Bedroom 940-1,040 57
Three-Bedroom 1,500 4
Total 255
Based on the project applicant’s standard lease agreement, the project applicant will limit the number of tenants per unit to two persons per bedroom and one person per living room. Table 3, Residential Population, below summarizes maximum tenants allowed per dwelling unit type. As shown in Table 3, the proposed project would have a maximum residential tenant population of 812 persons.

Table 3 Residential Population
Unit Type Maximum Occupancy Number of Units Population
Studio and Junior One-Bedroom 2 83 166
One-Bedroom 3 111 333
Two-Bedroom 5 57 285
Three-Bedroom 7 4 28
Total 812

1.3.1.2 COMMERCIAL
Retail Uses
Retail uses would be located at the ground floor and are focused on the easterly edge that faces the existing commercial retail and parking on Rosemead Boulevard. Local serving retail would consist of up to approximately 5,730 square feet of small business spaces to provide services to the local community. Small businesses may include services such as coffee shops, print shops, laundry, or tailoring services to serve the needs of the local community and future residents. The uses would operate during typical commercial hours that would vary by use, but could generally operate Monday through Sunday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

1.3.1.3 RECREATIONAL AMENITIES AND OPEN SPACE
As shown in Figure 5, Open Space and Rooftop Recreation Concept, the proposed project includes public and private recreational uses and open space. On the ground floor, the proposed project would include a total of 28,770 square feet of public and private open space in the form of passive plaza-type green spaces. Residents would be provided residential amenity space on the rooftop and in community rooms (17,010 square feet). Rooftop recreational uses would include a swimming pool, jacuzzi, poolside cabanas, clubhouse, gym, barbecue area, and garden/green areas. Additionally, private balconies or patio areas would be provided for each residential unit which would provide a total of approximately 20,693 square feet of private open space.

Source: Danielian Associates, 2022
PlaceWorks
0 Scale (Feet)
50 THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Figure 4 - Site Plan
Property Line Setback

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

PlaceWorks
Figure 5 - Open Space and Rooftop Recreation Concept

THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Property Boundary
Building Footprint
Common/Public Open Space
Resident Ground Floor Open Areas
Resident Rooftop Recreation Areas
Open Space Concept Rooftop Recreation Concept
0 Scale (Feet)
80 Public Access
Public Access
Public Access
Source: Danielian Associates, 2022

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction
July 2022 Page 17

1.3.2 Project Access and Parking

1.3.2.1 PROJECT SITE ACCESS
Vehicular access to the project site would be provided by one existing driveway from Washington Boulevard to the south and two vehicle access points (drive aisles) from Rosemead Boulevard to the east. The existing westerly project driveway on Washington Boulevard would be restricted to only emergency vehicle access. The other existing access points along Washington Boulevard and Rosemead Boulevard would remain. The existing driveway on Washington Boulevard is located on the north side of Washington Boulevard along the easterly property boundary directly west of the existing McDonalds restaurant. This driveway currently serves the existing McDonald’s restaurant adjacent to the project site. The site driveway would provide access to the main internal roadway surrounding the proposed building and to the subterranean parking entrance for the proposed project. The driveway would continue to accommodate left-turn ingress and right-turn ingress and egress traffic movements (i.e., no left-turns out). No physical modifications are proposed at this driveway. The existing Rosemead Boulevard driveway is located on the west side of Rosemead Boulevard north of Washington Boulevard. This signalized driveway currently serves the existing Pico Rivera Marketplace and would also serve the proposed project. The driveway would continue to accommodate full access (i.e., left-turn and right-turn ingress and egress traffic movements).

Within the project site, vehicular circulation would be accommodated by a drive aisle which is adjacent to the east and north sides of the proposed building. The drive aisle would be no less than 28 feet wide in order to accommodate Fire Department access to the project site.

1.3.2.2 PROJECT PARKING
The Specific Plan would allow for a minimum of 420 total parking spaces, which is 149 parking spaces less than required by the Pico Rivera Municipal Code. The proposed project is planned to provide a total of 464 vehicular parking spaces on-site, including 437 spaces within the new parking garage and 27 on-site surface parking spaces. The new parking structure is planned to provide 390 residential spaces (i.e., 358 resident parking spaces and 32 spaces for residential guest parking) and 74 parking spaces for non-residential uses. Refer to Table 4, Summary of Parking Spaces.

As part of the parking spaces provided, a total of 19 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) accessible spaces would be provided on-site, of which 16 spaces are allocated for residential use and three (3) spaces are allocated for the commercial use. In addition, 47 electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) ready spaces would be provided on-site (i.e., 44 residential spaces and 3 commercial spaces). Bicycle parking and storage would also be provided for the project, with a minimum of 12 long-term bicycle spaces for residents and a minimum of four (4) shortterm bicycle spaces. Short-term bicycle parking typically consists of bicycle racks. Long-term bicycle parking would be fully enclosed spaces and would typically consist of bicycle lockers, bicycle rooms, or bicycle cages.

Residents would be required to provide the make, model, and year of their vehicle(s) during lease execution and subsequently would be issued an access card or key for entry into the parking garage. All resident and employee parking policies would be outlined in the lease/rental agreement. “No Overnight Parking” signs would be posted within the existing shopping center to prohibit tenants from parking in the center overnight

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

and would be enforced by security staff monitoring the center on a 24-hour basis. The signage would also include verbiage that notes that any violations of the parking restriction are subject to towing. hour basis. The signage would also include verbiage that notes that any violations of the parking restriction are subject to towing.

The project applicant (or successor owner/s) will identify a Community Liaison/Parking Ombudsman in order to keep nearby residential communities informed on various matters and provide an open line of communication. The Community Liaison/Parking Ombudsman will efficiently manage parking and enforce changes that the project management team will make to prevent local neighborhood parking intrusion. The Parking Ombudsman would be responsible for enforcing resident and employee parking rules and will address any complaints from the public regarding neighborhood parking intrusion. The telephone number of the Parking Ombudsman would be disseminated to the surrounding communities. For example, should a community member notice a resident or employee parking in the general neighborhood, they would be able to notify the Ombudsman of the intrusion, as well as request enforcement if it was determined that the motorist parking was attributable to the proposed project. All verifiable violations would be documented for monitoring and reporting purposes and warnings and fines/penalties would be issued. A resident or employee that has been determined by the parking ombudsman to have violated the lease agreement policy (i.e., no on-street parking within the neighborhood) would receive a verbal warning upon their first violation. An employee with a second violation will receive a formal written warning that includes a restatement of the policy along with a notification that the employee’s supervisor/manager has been informed of the multiple violations. A resident with a second violation would receive a formal written warning that includes a restatement of the policy to be included in the resident’s file. Should a subsequent employee violation occur, it would result in the preparation of a formal letter to the project applicant’s Human Resources department to be included in the employee’s file and the employee’s supervisor/manager would again be notified in order to determine the appropriate penalty.

Should a subsequent resident violation occur, it would result in the issuance of a lease termination/non-renewal letter for violation of the terms outlined in the lease/rental agreement.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction
July 2022 Page 19
Table 4 Summary of Parking Spaces
Unit Type No. of Units/Sq, ft. Spaces to be Required by Specific Plan
Spaces
Required by
Municipal Code
Spaces Provided
Studio 35 units 35 70
390
1 Bedroom 159 units 223 318
2 Bedroom 57 units 92 114
3 Bedroom 4 units 8 8
Guest 255 unit1 32 32
Leasing 1,750 s.f. 7 7
74 Retail 5,730 s.f. 22 23
USPS 1 1 1
Additional Secured Parking
Total Parking 420 573 464
Notes:
1 The number of guest spaces are based on the total number of units for the proposed project.

Source: Pico Rivera Municipal Code Table 18.44.040

1.3.3 Pedestrian Improvements
Pedestrian paths on-site would connect to the sidewalk along Washington Boulevard on the southern side of the project site, run along the eastern side of the project site, and connect to an existing pedestrian path at the northeast side of the project site near the existing fitness building within the Pico Rivera Marketplace.

Pedestrian access to the project site would be provided via the existing public sidewalks and pedestrian facilities along Washington Boulevard and Rosemead Boulevard. A handicap accessible ramp would be installed at the west corner driveway at Washington Boulevard. Pedestrian access within the project site would be accommodated by an ADA compliant walkway that would connect the building entrance and retail frontages to the public right-of-way. This walkway would provide exclusive pedestrian and bicycle access from the public sidewalks to the proposed project site, thus minimizing the extent of pedestrian and bicycle interaction with vehicles at the site and providing a comfortable, convenient, and safe environment for pedestrians and bicyclists to access the proposed project from the public rights-of-way. Pedestrian pathways would also be constructed surrounding the proposed building and would connect to the existing shopping center pedestrian facilities, as shown in Figure 6, Pedestrian and Bicycle Access within the Project Site.

1.3.4 Architectural Design
The building would have a wrap-style design (i.e., the commercial space and apartments “wrap” around the internal parking structure) (see Figure 5, Site Plan). The proposed project would use a variety of colors and materials to provide an articulated architectural design, including manufactured stone veneer, balcony railings, cement plaster in various finish colors, cementitious vertical siding, and metal railings (see Figure 7, Articulation Concepts). Setbacks would vary around the perimeter of the development and are shown in Figure 8, Proposed Setbacks. The proposed building height (at the top of the sixth floor) would be 70 feet. Additional rooftop elements, such as recreation facilities, would be allowed up to an additional 11 feet (excluding roof parapet or screens around of mechanical equipment). The building height would step down to three stories at the

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

northwest corner of the project site near the residential community. As shown in Figure 9, Walls and Screening Concept, block walls would be included where the project site boundary meets with residential uses to the northwest of the project site and where the project site meets with the existing bank parking lot to the west.

Additional green wall screening and an evergreen privacy hedge would separate residential uses from the block walls.

1.3.4.1 LANDSCAPING
There are non-native mature palm trees and ornamental landscaping located onsite and these would be removed by the project development/developer. The proposed project would include the planting of ornamental trees around the southeast, southwest and northwest sides of the building, street trees along Washington Boulevard, and accent patio trees along the western portion of the building. Landscaping would surround the proposed building. The landscape features for the proposed project would/will include fencing with synthetic lawn dog runs, evergreen privacy hedges, raised planter walls, and water features (See Figure 10, Landscape Concept). The proposed landscaping would soften transitions from ground plane to vertical plane and provide screening to the adjacent neighborhood as well as shading at the ground floor perimeter of the building.

1.3.4.2 LIGHTING
The lighting for the proposed project would include safety and security lighting, primarily along walkways, outdoor parking areas, and steps for pedestrian safety at the ground level, and accent lighting on the building and landscaping. String lighting and LED accent lighting would be included on the rooftop recreation area.

1.3.4.3 SIGNAGE PROGRAM
The proposed project would include a signage program to provide regulation for the quantity, size, placement, and material of signs on the project site. Retail tenants would be allowed to use their own corporate fonts, colors and logos on signs. The signage program would be used to inform guests of the proposed project’s many retail offerings and locations, as well as provide way finding. The guidelines of the program would be designed to complement the architectural elements of the building and coordinate the type, placement, and physical dimensions of all signage. Letter height and logo height shall not exceed 14 inches and each tenant is allowed a maximum of 20 square feet per location.

PlaceWorks
Figure 6 - Pedestrian and Bicycle Access within the Project Site Source: Danielian Associates, 2022

THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
0 Scale (Feet)
80 Public Pedestrian Path
Enhanced Pedestrian Path at Retail Frontage
Crosswalk
On-site Secured Pedestrian Path
Pedestrian Connection to Gate
Fire Access Gate
Handicap Accessible Ramp
Building Resident Entry
Retail Service Corridor Access
Resident Bike Parking at Various Garage Levels
Public Bike Parking
Property Boundary
Pedestrian Access Gate

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

PlaceWorks
Figure 7 - Articulation Concepts
Source: Danielian Associates, 2022

THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

PlaceWorks
Figure 8 - Proposed Setbacks
Source: Danielian Associates, 2022
0 Scale (Feet)
80 Project Boundary
Building Footprint

THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

PlaceWorks
Figure 9 - Walls and Screening Concept
Source: Danielian Associates, 2022

THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Washington Blvd
0 Scale (Feet)
80 Project Boundary
Walls
Screening
Building Footprint
Project Parking Garage
Pedestrian Fence & Gates

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

PlaceWorks
Figure 10 - Landscape Concept
Source: Danielian Associates, 2022

THE MERCURY INITIAL STUDY

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
0 Scale (Feet)
80 T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction
July 2022 Page 31

1.3.5 Infrastructure Plan
Existing sewer, storm drain, and water lines would connect to the existing infrastructures along Washington Boulevard. All infrastructure improvements would comply with City and building code requirements.

1.3.5.1 POTABLE WATER
The Pico Water District provides water to the project site. The existing water system consists of an 8-inch steel water line along the north side of Washington Boulevard, and this water line currently provides the domestic water and fire water connections to the project site. A second existing 8-inch water line that connects to Washington Boulevard and extends throughout the existing retail center parking lot area provides fire water service for the project site. This fire water line is located in the parking lot drive aisle on the east and north sides of the project site and would continue to provide fire water service to the proposed project. During construction, portions of the existing water line and fire water line may be removed and replaced as required.

The proposed project would connect to the 8-inch water line in Washington Boulevard. New water meters and backflow would be installed to meet project demand, and a new fire double detector check valve would be installed for the fire line. Two new fire hydrants would also be installed on-site.

1.3.5.2 SEWER
The existing sewer system consists of an 8-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sewer line within Goodbee Street and extends west into and through the project site in a 15-foot-wide sewer easement. The existing sewer is in the northwest corner of the project site and continues along the northern boundary of the project site in the parking lot area that is shared with the adjacent property. The project site is served by a lateral that connects to the existing 8-inch sewer line. The proposed project would provide sewer connection to the existing 8-inch line in the northwest corner of the project site and/or the sewer line along the northern border of the project site.

Portions of the sewer line may be removed and replaced during construction as needed.

1.3.5.3 STORMWATER
The project site is largely paved with impervious surfaces. The existing storm drain system in the project site area includes a parkway culvert storm drain system on the north side of Washington Boulevard, adjacent to the project site, that collects existing street drainage flows from Washington Boulevard as well as onsite runoff and surrounding properties runoff. The stormwater is collected via surface gutters that are directed to the low point in Washington Boulevard, where the water enters the parkway culvert system from both the west and east, flows south in a storm drain culvert beneath Washington Boulevard, and discharges into a 48-inch storm drain line south of Washington Boulevard that extends through the project site in a public storm drain easement.

The proposed project would construct a new storm drain system on the project site that would collect, treat, and convey stormwater to the existing storm drain system in Washington Boulevard to the south of the project site. The on-site stormwater system would collect all runoff from the site, convey the stormwater through existing underground storm drain systems to a proposed retention and/or water quality treatment system(s) for infiltration and/or water quality treatment before discharging back to the public system. The proposed water quality system may include infiltration and bio-filtration systems that would filter the water through

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

special soil media. Any off-site surface flows that enter the site would be bypassed through the proposed storm drain system or would sheet flow to existing cross gutters.

1.3.5.4 DRY UTILITIES
Southern California Edison (SCE) provides electricity to the project site, and Southern California Gas (SoCalGas) provides natural gas services to the project site. The proposed project would require an Edison primary feed to multiple transformers based on electrical load estimates. This new electrical service would be underground and connect from an existing feed point in Washington Boulevard. SoCalGas and all-new communication services would run in a joint trench where possible, and all services would be underground.

1.3.5.5 SOLID WASTE
Solid waste would be contracted by the project applicant or owner-operator with a private waste hauler that meets State standards for recycling. Residential access to trash and recycling chutes would be located on all floors and terminate at ground floor trash room. At ground level, there would be separate trash holding area for commercial tenants, that would be transferred to the main trash room and compacted for pick up. The trash room would be provided at the rear of the proposed project site (see Figure 4, Site Plan).

1.3.6 Project Construction
Proposed project construction would occur over approximately 23 months. Construction would include the following activities: grading and excavation, trenching for site utilities and irrigation, building construction, architectural coatings, driveway and walkway construction, landscaping, and street connection improvements.

1.3.7 Project Approvals
Implementation of the proposed project would require the following discretionary and ministerial project approvals from the city of Pico Rivera:

1.3.7.1 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS REQUESTED
▪ Specific Plan approval - seeks adoption by ordinance to facilitate the implementation of the proposed uses and provide regulatory standards, zoning, and guidelines for the development. ▪ Zone reclassification - seeks to change the current zoning designation of General Commercial (GC) to Specific Plan (SP).
▪ Zone code amendment - seeks to add SP for this area to the Zoning Map ▪ General Plan amendment - seeks to change the current General Plan land use designations of MixedUse/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8 to Specific (SP) ▪ Conditional use permit to allow for the proposed project.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction
July 2022 Page 33

1.3.7.2 OTHER AGENCY ACTION REQUESTED

REGIONAL AGENCIES
▪ Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES permit; construction stormwater runoff permits, Storm Drain MS4 Permit)
▪ South Coast Air Quality Management District – Rule 201: Permit to construct ▪ Los Angeles County Fire Department (for emergency site access review)

LOCAL AGENCIES
▪ City of Pico Rivera Public Works/Engineering (for grading permit)

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

1. Introduction

This page intentionally left blank.

July 2022 Page 35

2. Environmental Checklist

2.1 PROJECT INFORMATION

1. Project Title: The Mercury Project Initial Study

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Pico Rivera
Community & Economic Development
6615 Passons Boulevard
Pico Rivera, CA 90660

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Julia Gonzalez, Deputy Director
562.942.2000
[email protected]

4. Project Location:

The project site is located at 8825 Washington Boulevard (APN: 6370-027-018) in the central part of the city of Pico Rivera, Los Angeles County, California. Regional access to the project site is via Interstate 605 (I-605), the San Gabriel River Freeway, 1.23 miles to the east, and Interstate 5 (I-5)/the Santa Ana Freeway, 2.0 miles to the south. Rosemead Boulevard also provides regional access and is located approximately 500 feet to the east. The project site is bounded by Washington Boulevard to the south and adjacent commercial uses to the north, east, and west. A single-family residential neighborhood borders the project site to the northwest.

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:

Kamyar Shabani
Mercury Bowl, LLC: Green Rivera, LLC
1801 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067-2323

6. General Plan Designation:

Mixed-Use/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8 (the Rosemead Boulevard and Washington Boulevard Opportunity Area).

7. Zoning: General Commercial (C-G).

8. Description of Project:

The proposed project involves development of a three to six-story mixed-use building with a 6.5-level parking structure in the core, 1 level of subterranean parking, ground-floor retail and residential uses, and residential uses in floors two through six on a 2.85-acre site. The building is a wrap-style with parking levels extending all floors interior to the building. The proposed project would develop 255 dwelling units

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist

consisting of a mix of studios, junior studios, one-bedrooms, two-bedrooms, and three-bedrooms, with 13 units set aside as affordable housing units. Up to 5,730 square feet of retail space, up to 1,750 square feet of ground-floor lobby/leasing space, up to 17,010 square feet of rooftop pool/community recreation, and up to 190,000 square feet of parking are included as part of the proposed project. The first floor of the proposed building would include a mix of retail, residential, public seating areas, and a main lobby/leasing office. Floors two through six include residential units, parking, and related residential amenities. The roof deck of the parking structure would include a pool and recreation facilities such as a gym and clubhouse for use by residents and their guests only. Implementation of the proposed project would require a General Plan amendment, zone code amendment, zone reclassification, conditional use permit, and approval of a Specific Plan.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

The project site is primarily surrounded by commercial and residential uses. The commercial properties immediately bordering the project site to the east and west are zoned General Commercial, and the commercial uses across Washington Boulevard are zoned Specific Plan. The Pico Rivera Marketplace has a general plan land use designation of Commercial, and the commercial uses to the west of the project site along Washington Boulevard have a general plan land use designation of Mixed-Use/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8. Commercial uses to the south of the project site have a general plan land use designation of Specific Plan. The single-family neighborhood to the northwest is zoned SingleFamily Residential (S-F) with a general plan land use designation of Low Density Residential.

10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participating agreement):
▪ Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES permit; construction stormwater runoff permits, Storm Drain MS4 Permit)
▪ South Coast Air Quality Management District – Rule 201: Permit to construct ▪ Los Angeles County Fire Department (for emergency site access review) ▪ City of Pico Rivera Public Works/Engineering (for grading permit)

11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.94 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist
July 2022 Page 37
The city of Pico Rivera invited California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area to consult on the proposed project via email and certified mail. Seven tribes were contacted consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18. The letters were sent to six tribes on May 14, 2021, and the letter was sent to Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians on June 17, 2021. The City received one request to consult from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. The tribe was subsequently contacted by City staff within 30 days of the request. The City held a consultation call with the Gabrieleño Band of Mission – Kizh Nation on March 15, 2022. The City also received a response from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, which recommended that the City contact the Gabrieleño/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians. The Gabrieleño/Tongva San Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians was on the list provided by Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and received a tribal consultation letter. No response was received from this tribe. The City followed up with all tribes on NAHC list and did not receive additional responses as of June 9, 2022.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist

2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture / Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities / Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance

2.3 DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist
July 2022 Page 39

2.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors, as well as general standards (e.g., the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).

2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.

3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.

4. “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.

5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.

6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.

7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist

8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.

9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.

Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
X
c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
X
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? X
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code
Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
X
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist
July 2022 Page 41
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
X
III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
X
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? X
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? X
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
X
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
X
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
X
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
X
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
X
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
X
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? X

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist

Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VI. ENERGY. Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
X
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? X
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.

X
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
X
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
X
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
X
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
X
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
X
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
X
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
X

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist
July 2022 Page 43
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
X
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
§ 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
X
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
X
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
X
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? X X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
X
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
X
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; X ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite;
X
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
X
iv) impede or redirect flood flows? X
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? X
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? X XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? X
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist

Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state?
X
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
X
XIII. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
X
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? X
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
X
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
X
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
X
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

Fire protection? X
Police protection? X
Schools? X
Parks? X
Other public facilities? X
XVI. RECREATION.
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
X

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist
July 2022 Page 45
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
X
XVII. TRANSPORTATION. Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
X
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
X
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? X
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
X
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code § 5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code § 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.

X
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
X
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
X
c) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
X

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

2. Environmental Checklist

Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
X
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X XX. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
X
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? X
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
X
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
X
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X
July 2022 Page 47

3. Environmental Analysis
Section 2.4 provided a checklist of environmental impacts. This section provides an evaluation of the impact categories and questions contained in the checklist and identifies mitigation measures, if applicable.

3.1 AESTHETICS
Except as provided in California Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. A scenic vista is defined as a viewpoint that provides expansive views of a highly valued landscape feature (e.g., a mountain range, lake, or coastline) or of a significant historic or architectural feature (e.g., views of a historic structure). The project site is in the central part of the city of Pico Rivera, surrounded by the Pico Rivera Marketplace to the north and east; a single-family residential neighborhood to the northwest; and commercial uses to the west and south across Washington Boulevard.

The project site and surrounding area lack significant topography and are developed with urban land uses. It had been previously developed with a commercial building that operated as a nightclub and was subsequently demolished. The project site is currently developed with just hard surfaces and landscaping. The proposed project would have a maximum building height of 70 feet above grade at the top of the sixth floor. The building height would be stepped down to three stories at the northwest corner of the project site, near the residential community. There are no protected or designated scenic vistas or views in the project vicinity, and the proposed project would not obscure any scenic vistas. Therefore, no impact would occur. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact. According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), State Route (SR) 57 between SR-90 and SR-60, which is located approximately 13 miles east of the project site, is considered an eligible state scenic highway from Post Mile (PM) 19.9 to R4.5 (Caltrans 2021). SR-91, approximately 16 miles east of the project site, is the closest officially designated state scenic highway to the project site (ibid). Since the proposed project is not located within these scenic highways, implementation of the proposed project would not damage scenic resources located within or near any state scenic highway. Therefore, no impact would occur.
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

3. Environmental Analysis

Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is in an urbanized area (as defined by California Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21071(a)(2))
1 and in the central portion of the city of Pico Rivera. The project site is currently zoned General Commercial (C-G) with a general plan land use designation of MixedUse/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8 (the Rosemead Boulevard and Washington Boulevard Opportunity Area) (Pico Rivera 2014). The project site is primarily surrounded by commercial and residential uses, including the Pico Rivera Marketplace, which has a general plan land use designation of Commercial, and commercial uses to the west of the project site along Washington Boulevard, which have a general plan land use designation of Mixed-Use/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8. Commercial uses to the south of the project site have a general plan land use designation of Specific Plan (Pico Rivera 2014), and the singlefamily neighborhood to the northwest is zoned Single-Family Residential (S-F) with a general plan land use designation of Low-Density Residential (Pico Rivera 2021, 2014).

The proposed project would require a change to the current zoning designation of General Commercial (GC) to Specific Plan (SP), as well as a zone code amendment to add SP for this area to the Zoning Map. Additionally, the proposed project would change the current general plan land use designations of Mixed-Use/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8 to SP. The proposed project would also incorporate landscape and lighting guidelines that would support the aesthetics of the development. The project site is vacant and disturbed with largely impervious surfaces and fenced from public access; the proposed project would allow for a well-designed and aesthetically pleasing mixed-use building and landscaped areas that would activate the project site and contribute to the surrounding uses.

Further, the proposed project would be consistent with relevant goals and policies included in the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan, such as Policy 3.8-4, which promotes high-quality mixed-use development that is compatible with surrounding uses and enhances adjacent streetscapes, and Policy 3.8-7, which requires screening, setback, or buffering from projects adjacent to residential neighborhoods (Pico Rivera 2014).

Implementation of the proposed project would result in a mixed-use building that would integrate with the surrounding community and would not change the scenic quality of the currently urbanized area.The proposed project would be taller than current buildings in the area but would provide building setbacks, privacy block wall and hedges along residential neighborhood. Specifically, the proposed project would step down to three stories on the northwest corner near the residential community.

Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. Impacts to the scenic quality would be less than significant. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less Than Significant Impact. The two major causes of light pollution in any urban setting are spill light and glare. Spill light is caused by misdirected light that illuminates areas outside the area intended to be lit. The adjacent commercial areas to the proposed project generate nighttime light from security and parking lot lights, 1 PRC Section 21071(a)(2) defines urbanized area as an incorporated city has a population of less than 100,000 persons if the population of that city and not more than two contiguous incorporated cities combined equals at least 100,000 persons. The population of Pico Rivera (60,088 persons) along with the city of Downey (114,355 persons), which borders the city to the south, have a combined population of 174,443 persons (U.S. Census 2020). Thus, Pico Rivera meets the definition of an urbanized area.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

3. Environmental Analysis
July 2022 Page 49
building lights (interior and exterior), streetlights, and vehicle lights. Additionally, light sources in the residential neighborhood to the northwest include street lights, lighting emanating from windows, outdoor residential lighting, and vehicles traveling on surface streets. Glare can occur when a bright object or light source reflects off of a reflective/light-colored surface. Existing sources of glare include light-colored building materials, parked vehicles on surface parking lots and traveling on public rights-of-way.

The proposed project is in an urbanized area and would include light sources that are typical of an urbanized area, and it would not introduce any high-intensity lighting such as is used for athletic fields or nighttime sports activity. The proposed project would have nighttime lights for the safety and security (such as such as lighting along walkways, and in the surface parking lot), as well as tree accent lighting and light emitting diode (LED) step lights. Buildout of the proposed project would be consistent with the SP, which has a primary goal of preventing light spill to the residential neighborhood (zero foot-candles). Landscaping and a wall along the northwest corner of the project site, adjacent to the residential neighborhood, would prevent light spilling onto the residential neighborhood (see Figures 9, Wall and Screening Concept, and 10, Landscape Concept). The proposed project would not therefore significantly increase nighttime lighting from what currently exists at the site.

The project site is in an urbanized area and would have surfaces that are typical of an urbanized area. The proposed project’s architectural design would include non-reflective surfaces, such as manufactured stone veneer, cement plaster, and cementitious vertical siding, which would reduce the amount of glare from the proposed development. Landscaping throughout the project site would further reduce glare.

The proposed project would not introduce lighting nor reflective surfaces at substantially greater intensities than existing lights and buildings near the site. The proposed project would not result in a new source of substantial light or glare and would not impact daytime nor nighttime views. Therefore, light and glare impacts would be less than significant.

3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation (DOC) as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.

Would the project:

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

3. Environmental Analysis

a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The project site is located within a commercial area and is surrounded by commercial and residential areas in the city of Pico Rivera. The project site and surrounding area are void of agricultural uses.

DOC’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) maps California’s agricultural resources and determines the suitability of land throughout the state for agriculture purposes. The DOC produces these maps on a statewide level and by county. The DOC’s FMMP map for Los Angeles County identifies the project site as “Urban and Built-Up Land” (DOC 2021).

The project site is currently zoned General Commercial (C-G) with a general plan land use designation of Mixed-Use/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8 (the Rosemead Boulevard and Washington Boulevard Opportunity Area) (Pico Rivera 2014). It is not zoned or used for agriculture. Therefore, development on the project site would not convert prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance to a non-agricultural use and no impact would occur.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The project site was previously developed with a commercial building that operated as a nightclub until March 2015 and was subsequently demolished in 2020. The project site is currently vacant, paved, and contains ornamental landscaping, including palm trees. The project site is currently zoned General Commercial (C-G) with a general plan land use designation of Mixed-Use/Housing Element Site Opportunity Area 8 (the Rosemead Boulevard and Washington Boulevard Opportunity Area) (Pico Rivera 2014). Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with an existing zone for agricultural use or conflict with a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? No Impact. The City of Pico Rivera is an urban developed city and there are no forest lands or timberland in the city limits. The project site is currently zoned General Commercial (C-G) and is not zoned for, nor used as forest land or timberland (Pico Rivera 2014). The proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning or cause the rezoning of forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impact would occur. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The project site is located within commercial and residential area in the city of Pico Rivera. The project site is currently vacant, does not contain forest land, and development of the proposed project would not result in the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. No impact would occur.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

3. Environmental Analysis
July 2022 Page 51
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
No Impact. The proposed project includes the development of commercial and residential uses in an urban area. Though the project site is currently vacant, it is located in an area completely developed for commercial and residential uses, and there are no farmland and forest land in and around the project site. The FMMP characterizes the project site as “Urban and Built-Up Land.” The development of the proposed project would not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses nor the conversion of forest land to nonforest uses. No impact would occur.

3.3 AIR QUALITY
The Air Quality section addresses the impacts of the proposed project on ambient air quality and the exposure of people, especially sensitive individuals, to unhealthful pollutant concentrations. A background discussion on the air quality regulatory setting, meteorological conditions, existing ambient air quality in the vicinity of the project site, and air quality modeling can be found in Appendix A.

The primary air pollutants of concern for which ambient air quality standards (AAQS) have been established are ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and lead (Pb). Areas are classified under the federal and California Clean Air Act as either in “attainment” or “nonattainment” for each criteria pollutant based on whether the AAQS have been achieved. The South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), which is managed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD), is designated nonattainment for O3, and PM2.5 under the California and National AAQS, nonattainment for PM10 under the California AAQS, and nonattainment for lead (Los Angeles County only) under the National AAQS (CARB 2021).

Furthermore, the South Coast AQMD has identified regional thresholds of significance for criteria pollutant emissions and criteria air pollutant precursors, including VOC, CO, NOx, sulfur oxide (SOx), PM10, and PM2.5.

Development projects below the regional significance thresholds are not expected to generate sufficient criteria pollutant emissions to violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Where available, the significance criteria established by the South Coast AQMD may be relied upon to make the following determinations.

Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The South Coast AQMD adopted the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) on March 3, 2017. Regional growth projections are used by South Coast AQMD to forecast future emission levels in the SoCAB. For southern California, these regional growth projections are provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and are partially based on land use designations included in city/county general plans. Typically, only large, regionally significant projects have the potential to affect regional growth projections. In addition, the consistency analysis is generally only required in connection

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

3. Environmental Analysis

with the adoption of general plans, specific plans, and significant projects. As the proposed project is not a regionally significant project, a consistency analysis is not required.

Changes in population, housing, or employment growth projections have the potential to affect SCAG’s demographic projections and therefore the assumptions in South Coast AQMD’s AQMP. The project would result in 255 residential units. As discussed in Section 3.14, Population and Housing, the proposed project’s population growth would be within SCAG’s forecast growth projections for the city. Additionally, as demonstrated below in Section 3.3(b), the regional emissions of the proposed project would be less than the South Coast AQMD emissions thresholds under the construction (with mitigation measures) and the operational phases. Therefore, it would not be considered by South Coast AQMD to be a substantial source of air pollutant emissions that would have the potential to affect the attainment designations in the SoCAB.

Therefore, the proposed project would not affect the regional emissions inventory or conflict with strategies in the AQMP. Impacts would be less than significant.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The following describes project-related impacts from regional short-term construction activities and regional long-term operation of the proposed project. As discussed above, the SoCAB, which is managed by the South Coast AQMD, is designated nonattainment for O3, and PM2.5 under the California and National AAQS, nonattainment for PM10 under the California AAQS, and nonattainment for lead (Los Angeles County only) under the National AAQS (CARB 2021).

Regional Short-Term Construction Impacts
Construction activities would result in the generation of air pollutants. These emissions would primarily be 1) exhaust from off-road diesel-powered construction equipment; 2) dust generated by construction activities; 3) exhaust from on-road vehicles; and 4) off-gassing of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from paints and asphalt.

Construction activities for the mixed-use proposed project development are anticipated to disturb 2.85 acres on the project site. The project site currently consists of paved surfaces (no structures) and contains ornamental landscaping. The project would involve asphalt demolition and debris haul, site preparation, rough and fine grading and grading soil haul, utilities trenching, paving, building construction, and architectural coating.

Construction is anticipated to occur over 23 months. Construction emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2020.4, and are based on the preliminary construction duration and equipment mix provided by the project applicant. Construction emissions modeling are shown in Table 5, Maximum Daily Regional Construction Emissions, and shows maximum daily emissions for NOx, CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5 from construction-related activities would be less than their respective South Coast AQMD regional significance threshold values. However, construction-related VOC emissions generated from paints used in architectural coating of the new structures on the project site would exceed the South Coast AQMD regional significance threshold for VOC. Impacts therefore have the potential to be significant without the implementation of mitigation measures. However, as shown in Table 6, Maximum Daily Regional Construction

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

3. Environmental Analysis
July 2022 Page 53
Emissions with Mitigation Incorporated, implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 would reduce constructionrelated emissions to below the significance thresholds by requiring use of 0 VOC-content paints for building interior coating. Therefore, air quality impacts from project-related construction activities would be less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.

Table 5 Maximum Daily Regional Construction Emissions
Construction Phase
Pollutants
(lb/day)1, 2
VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Year 2022
Asphalt Demolition 2 17 15 <1 1 1
Asphalt Demolition and Debris Haul 2 23 16 <1 5 2
Site Preparation 2 17 10 <1 1 1
Rough Grading 3 30 21 <1 5 3
Rough Grading and Soil Haul 3 44 24 <1 6 3
Utilities Trenching 1 8 7 <1 1 <1
Utilities Trenching, Fine Grading and Soil Haul, and
Building Construction 2022 4 51 32 <1 5 2
Utilities Trenching and Building Construction 2022 3 23 23 <1 2 1 Building Construction 2022 2 15 17 <1 1 1
Year 2023
Building Construction 2023 2 14 16 <1 1 1
Building Construction 2023 and Paving 3 23 29 <1 2 1
Building Construction 2023 and Architectural Coating 144 15 19 <1 1 1 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions 144 51 32 <1 6 3
South Coast AQMD Regional Construction
Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Significant? Yes No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.
1 Based on the preliminary information provided by the project applicant. Where specific information regarding project-related construction activities was not available, construction assumptions were based on CalEEMod defaults, which are based on construction surveys conducted by South Coast AQMD of construction equipment. 2 Includes implementation of fugitive dust control measures required by South Coast AQMD under Rule 403, including watering disturbed areas a minimum of two times per day, reducing speed limit to 15 miles per hour on unpaved surfaces, replacing ground cover quickly, and street sweeping with Rule 1186–compliant sweepers.

Mitigation Measures
Construction
AQ-1 The construction contractor(s) shall only use interior paints with a VOC (volatile organic compound) content of 0 grams per liter (g/L) to reduce VOC emissions. All building and site plans shall note use of paints with a VOC content of 0 g/L. Prior to construction, the construction contractor(s) shall ensure that all construction plans submitted to the City’s Building Division clearly show the requirement for use on interior paint with a VOC content of 0 g/L for the specified buildings, herein.

T H E M E R C U R Y P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

C I T Y O F P I C O R I V E R A

3. Environmental Analysis