Agenda packet — Pico Rivera City Council, June 23, 2026 (part 1 of 3)

*Commissioners receive a $30.00 stipend per each meeting held and attended. .

Tuesday, June 23, 2026
Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.

Council Chamber
6615 Passons Boulevard
Next Resolution No. 7490
Next Ordinance No. 1209
Next Agreement No. 26-2549
Housing Assistance Agency
Next Resolution No. HA-112
Next Ordinance No. HA-16
Water Authority
Next Resolution No. WA-26-37
Next Ordinance No. WA-26-01
Next Agreement No. WA-26-83
Public Financing Authority
Next Resolution No. PFA-26-13
ROLL CALL:

Mayor/Chairman/President:

Gustavo V. Camacho
Mayor Pro Tempore/Vice Chairman/Vice President:

Dr. Monica Sánchez
Councilmembers/Directors/Commissioners:

John R. Garcia
Andrew C. Lara
Erik Lutz
INVOCATION:

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

COMMISSIONERS SCHEDULED TO BE PRESENT:

Patricia Saucedo, Parks and Recreation Commission
Bob Perez, Sister City Commission
SPECIAL PRESENTATION:
• Certificates of Recognition – Pico Rivera AYSO Region 603, Boys U12 – Fall Team No Mercy and All Star/Spring Select Pico FC

PLEASE TURN OFF OR SILENCE CELL PHONES WHILE MEETING IS IN SESSION

AND PLEASE REFRAIN FROM TEXTING DURING THE MEETING
**Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Council meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Council. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Council, and the Council does not endorse the religious beliefs or views of this, or any other invocation speaker.
**************************************************************************************************** In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Pico Rivera is committed to providing reasonable accommodations for a person with a disability. Please call the City Clerk’s office at (562) 801-4389, if special accommodation is necessary and/or if information is needed in an alternative format. Special requests must be made in a reasonable amount of time in order that accommodation to be arranged (within 24 to 48 hours’ notice).

Meeting jointly and regularly with the Pico Rivera *Housing Assistance Agency (as needed); Pico Rivera Water Authority (as needed); and Public Financing Authority (as needed) 6-23-2026 Agenda City Council

Page 2 of 7 ends

PUBLIC HEARING:

City Council:

1. Public Hearing – Zone Code Amendment No. 200 Amending Section Title 18, Zoning Code of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code Relating to Secondhand Dealers and Adoption of Provisions Consistent with California Assembly Bill 2632. (1300)
a) Open public hearing
b) Memo from City Manager
c) Written Communications
d) Oral Communications
e) Close public hearing
f) Recommendation:

1. Introduce and waive the first reading of an ordinance approving Zone Code Amendment No. 200, amending Chapters 18.18 General Site Standards,

18.19 Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards and 18.22 Standards for Special Uses and Activities of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code; and

2. Find the ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3).

Ordinance No. _____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 18.18.

GENERAL SITE STANDARDS, 18.19. OFF-STREET PARKING AND
LOADING STANDARDS AND 18.22. STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES AND ACTIVITIES OF TITLE 18, ZONING CODE OF THE PICO RIVERA

MUNICIPAL CODE HEREIN REFERRED TO AS ZONE CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 200 (FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION)
PUBLIC COMMENTS:

TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON ANY AGENDA OR NON-AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE

SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST OR WRITTEN COMMENT ONLINE PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING BY CLICKING HERE OR VISITING THE CITY’S WEBSITE AT WWW.PICO-RIVERA.ORG.

When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and city of residency for the record. You have three (3) minutes to make your remarks. In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2, members of the City Council may only: 1) respond briefly to statements made or questions posed by the public; 2) ask a question for clarification; 3) provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information; 4) request staff to report to the City Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter raised by the public; and 5) direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.

City Council members cannot comment on items that are not listed on a posted agenda.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS:

All items listed on the Consent Calendar may be acted on by a single motion without separate discussion. Any motion relating to a Resolution or Ordinance shall also waive 6-23-2026 Agenda City Council

Page 3 of 7 ends

the reading of the titles in full and include its adoption as appropriate. If discussion or separate vote on any item is desired by a Councilmember or staff, that item may be pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

City Council:

2. Minutes:
• City Council regular meeting of June 9, 2026
Recommendation: Approve

3. 19th Warrant Register of the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year. (700) Check Numbers: 300837-300953
Special Check Numbers: None
Recommendation: Approve

4. Adoption of Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating Budget and Year Two (2) of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program. (700)
Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution adopting the fiscal year 2026-27 Operating Budget and Year Two (2) of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Budget; and

2. Approve a resolution adopting the updated General Fund and Proprietary Fund reserve policies.

Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, RENEWING GENERAL FUND

POLICIES WITH RESERVE POLICIES FOR THE GENERAL FUND, THE

PICO RIVERA INNOVATIVE MUNICIPAL ENERGY ENTERPRISE FUND,

AND THE WATER FUND

5. Resolution Updating Job Description for the Full-Time Senior Human Resources Manager for the Human Resources Division. (200) Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution updating job description for the full-time Senior Manager in the Human Resources Division of the Administration Department.

Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, UPDATING THE JOB

DESCRIPTION FOR THE FULL-TIME SENIOR MANAGER (HUMAN

RESOURCES) POSITION

6. Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Adoption. (1400) 6-23-2026 Agenda City Council

Page 4 of 7 ends

Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution adopting the Engineering and Traffic Survey recommendations regarding speed limits along the City of Pico Rivera street segments, as described in said resolution.

Resolution No. ____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
DESIGNATING SPEED LIMITS FOR CERTAIN CITY’STREETS

7. Budget Amendment Related to the Acquisition of 8613 Whittier Boulevard.

Recommendation: (700)

1. Approve an amendment to the fiscal year (FY) 2025-26 budget by reducing the State Grant fund revenue account and expenditure account by $450,000; and

2. Approve an amendment to the FY 2025-26 budget by transferring $325,133 from the General Fund Community & Economic Development (CED) budget to the General Fund Non-Departmental budget to fund the acquisition of 8613 Whittier Boulevard (APN: 6372-018-012).

8. Budget Amendment Related to the Acquisition of ACE Properties. (700) Recommendation:

1. Approve an amendment to the fiscal year (FY) 2025-26 Budget by transferring $591,420 from the General Fund Community & Economic Development (CED) budget to the General Fund Non-Departmental budget to complete the acquisition of the ACE properties.

9. Treasurer’s Monthly Investment Transaction Report as of May 31, 2026.(700) Recommendation:

1. Receive and file the Treasurer’s Monthly Investment Transaction Report as of May 31, 2026.

10. Amendment No. 7 To Agreement No. 18-1825 with Mariposa Landscapes Inc. for Routine Landscape Maintenance Services. (500)
Recommendation:

1. Approve Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No. 18-1825 with Mariposa Landscapes Inc. in the amount not-to-exceed $268,476 ($44,746 per month) for routine maintenance services on a month-to-month basis for six (6) months; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Agreement No. 18-1825-7
Housing Assistance Agency:

11. Minutes:
• Housing Assistance Agency regular meeting of March 24, 2026 Recommendation: Receive and file
6-23-2026 Agenda City Council

Page 5 of 7 ends

12. Section 8 Management Assessment Program Certification for Fiscal Year 2025-26. (500)
Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution approving the submission of the Section 8 Management Assessment Program Certification for fiscal year 2025-26 and submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE

AGENCY OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF THE SECTION 8 MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT
PROGRAM CERTIFICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 TO THE U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Water Authority:

13. Minutes:
• Water Authority regular meeting of March 24, 2026
Recommendation: Receive and file

14. Agreement with Weck Laboratories, Inc. for Potable Water Analytical and Sampling Services Related to Public Water Supply. (500) Recommendation:

1. Award a three (3) year contract with two (2), one-year renewal options with Weck Laboratories, Inc., for potable water analytical and sampling services related to public water supply for an annual amount of $250,000, for a notto-exceed amount of $750,000; and

2. Authorize the Executive Director or his designee to execute the contract in a form approved by the General Counsel.

Agreement No. ________

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION
REGULAR AGENDA:

City Council:

15. An Ordinance Amending Title 8, Health and Safety of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code. (700)
Recommendation:

1. Introduce and waive the first reading amending Title 8, Health and Safety of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code; and

2. Find the ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3).

Ordinance No. _____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8, HEALTH 6-23-2026 Agenda City Council

Page 6 of 7 ends

AND SAFETY OF THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE (FIRST

READING AND INTRODUCTION)

16. Senate Bill 707 Compliance Requirements and Adoption of City Council Policies Related to Remote Participation and Public Agenda Posting. (300) Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution adopting procedures for the disruption of remote services during City Council meetings, incorporating new Brown Act amendments related to two-way remote access pursuant to Senate Bill 707; and

2. Approve a resolution adopting a public agenda posting board policy pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.4(c)(3).

Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING COUNCIL POLICY

FOR DISRUPTION OF REMOTE PARTICIPATION DURING A COUNCIL

MEETING
Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PUBLIC AGENDA

POSTING BOARD POLICY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54953.4

CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS
GOOD OF THE ORDER (INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGENCY MEETINGS, AB 1234

REPORTS, NEW BUSINESS, OLD BUSINESS)
CLOSED SESSION:
a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 549569(d)(1)
City of Pico Rivera v. Super Lodging Services, LLC, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 26STCV11523
b. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1)
Title: City Manager

CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS
GOOD OF THE ORDER (INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGENCY MEETINGS, AB 1234

REPORTS, NEW BUSINESS, OLD BUSINESS)
ADJOURNMENT:
6-23-2026 Agenda City Council

Page 7 of 7 ends

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Cynthia Ayala, City Clerk, for the City of Pico Rivera, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing notice was posted at the Pico Rivera City Hall bulletin board, Pico Rivera website www.pico-rivera.org, Pico Rivera Post Office which are available for the public to view on this 18th, day of June 2026.

Dated this 18th of June 2026.

Cynthia Ayala, CMC
City Clerk
SB343 NOTICE
In compliance with and pursuant to the provisions of SB343 any public writing distributed by the City Clerk to at least a majority of the City Council Members regarding any item on this regular meeting agenda will be available on the City’s website.

STATEMENT REGARDING DECORUM AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
If you wish to speak at the time set aside for public comments, the City Council has established the following standards and Rules of Decorum as allowed by State law. • Public comments are limited to those portions of the meeting referred to as Public Comments. These portions are intended for members of the public to address the City Council, Housing Assistance Agency or Water Authority on matters related to agendas or any other items under the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council or Agencies. Please submit your electronic written comment or your request to speak prior to the start of the meeting at 6:00 p.m.

Once the meeting has begun, no further comments will be accepted. • Public Hearing Comment requests – are for those wishing to address the Council/Agency on a specific Public Hearing item only.
• All other Public Comment requests – are for those wishing to address the Council/Agency on agenda items or any other items under the subject jurisdiction of the City Council/Agency.
• Citizens may address the Council, Water Authority or Housing Assistance Agency once for a maximum of three minutes. After each speaker returns to his/her seat, the Mayor shall determine the time and manner of response, but typically if answers are available, they will be given after all speakers have had an opportunity to address the City Council. • Members of the audience are asked to refrain from clapping or otherwise speaking from their seats. Those not meeting the standards for decorum may be escorted from the meeting.

RULES OF DECORUM CAN BE FOUND IN THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION

2.08.050 AS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 783 ADOPTED ON AUGUST 20, 1990 AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCES 822 (SEPTEMBER 21, 1992) AND 1020 (MARCH 21, 2006).

To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Meeting Date: June 23, 2026
Subject: PUBLIC HEARING – ZONE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 200
AMENDING SECTION TITLE 18, ZONING CODE OF THE PICO

RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SECONDHAND

DEALERS AND ADOPTION OF PROVISIONS CONSISTENT WITH
CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL 2632 (FIRST READING AND

INTRODUCTION)
Recommendation:

1. Introduce and waive the first reading of an ordinance approving Zone Code Amendment No. 200, amending Chapters 18.18 General Site Standards, 18.19 Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards and 18.22 Standards for Special Uses and Activities of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code; and

2. Find the ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3).

Strategic Priority:
2 - Economic Development & Land Use - Encourage the development of underutilized space, plan for growth, and engage businesses to transform the City as an economic and cultural hub.

Strategy:

2.1 Foster an environment that promotes diverse business growth, attraction, retention, and housing opportunities in the city.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund associated with this ordinance. Any implementation and enforcement activities can be accommodated within existing departmental resources.
1 Back to Outline
PUBLIC HEARING – ZONE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 200 AMENDING SECTION TITLE 18, ZONING CODE OF THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO

SECONDHAND DEALERS AND ADOPTION OF PROVISIONS CONSISTENT WITH CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL 2632 (FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION)

Page 2 of 4 ends

Background:

Effective January 2025 the State of California adopted California Assembly Bill 2632 to modernize and streamline regulations applicable to secondhand dealers and secondhand goods transactions. The legislation amended provisions of the California Business and Professions Code governing reporting requirements, recordkeeping, and operational standards for thrift stores and secondhand retail stores. The law requires cities and counties to permit thrift stores as a use by right in all zoning districts where general retail sales are allowed, and to regulate such establishments in a manner consistent with nonthrift retail uses.

While AB 2632 limits the ability of local agencies to impose discretionary controls on thrift store operations, it preserves local authority to adopt and enforce reasonable operational standards governing the collection and donation of goods pursuant to Government Code Section 65632. These standards may include regulations related to hours of operation, equipment, procedures, health, and safety measures.

On December 9, 2025, the City Council adopted a comprehensive update to Title 18, Zoning Code, representing the City’s first major update to its zoning regulations since 1993. As part of this effort, staff incorporated operational standards applicable to thrift stores in compliance with AB 2632. Since adoption, staff has identified additional measures intended to prevent negative impacts associated with these uses.

In addition, staff is proposing select amendments to improve clarity and ensure internal consistency throughout the Zoning Code.

Discussion:

The following is a summary of the proposed amendments to each chapter and section of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code. The proposed amendments are found in the ordinance (Enclosure 1) with added language double underlined and deleted language indicated with a strikethrough.

Amendment to thrift stores operational and aesthetic standards:

Chapter 18.22. Standards for Special Uses and Activities, Section 18.22.210. Thrift Stores

1. The building and site shall be maintained in a neat, clean, and orderly condition.

2. Outside storage shall not be permitted.

3. Hours of operation shall be between 10:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.

4. Donations shall be accepted only during business hours.

PUBLIC HEARING – ZONE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 200 AMENDING SECTION TITLE 18, ZONING CODE OF THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO

SECONDHAND DEALERS AND ADOPTION OF PROVISIONS CONSISTENT WITH CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL 2632 (FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION)

Page 3 of 4 ends

5. All sales and displays of merchandise shall be permitted within a building only.

6. There shall be no drop-off of donated goods outside of business hours.

7. The operator shall post a notice in a visible location at any public entrance, which states that goods may not be deposited when the store is closed and listing hours when and where donations will be accepted.

8. All donation activity shall be conducted entirely indoors.

9. Any donated, discarded, or illegally dumped items left outside the building shall be removed immediately by operator.

10.Donation acceptance areas shall be clearly marked. The thrift store shall submit a vehicular circulation plan, which does not interfere with any adjacent commercial shopping center ingress, egress, or parking, and shall not queue onto adjacent property or the public right-of-way.

11.Exterior alterations to the premises and all signage must be designed and installed in compliance with all applicable City regulations.

Miscellaneous Amendments
These development standards were in fact in the City’s former Zoning Code; however, they were not carried forward when the zoning code was updated. The proposed amendments restore and clarify these requirements within the updated Zoning Code.

Chapter 18.18. General Site Standards, Section 18.18.070. Screening Revise Section 18.18.070(B)(2) Ground- or Wall-Mounted Equipment to clarify screening and setback requirements for mechanical equipment on residential properties.

Chapter 18.19. Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards, Section 18.19.020. General Provision.

Update Section 18.19.020(E)(3) Paving, General to specify that residential driveways cannot consist of asphaltic material.

Chapter 18.22. Standards for Special Uses and Activities, Section 18.22.130. Home Occupations.

Update Section 18.22.130(B)(1) to include that only one home occupation permit can be issued for a dwelling.

Environmental Analysis:

The proposed ordinance is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3). An activity is not subject to CEQA if: The activity will not result in a direct PUBLIC HEARING – ZONE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 200 AMENDING SECTION TITLE 18, ZONING CODE OF THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO

SECONDHAND DEALERS AND ADOPTION OF PROVISIONS CONSISTENT WITH CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL 2632 (FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION)

Page 4 of 4 ends

or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378. The activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Here it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, therefore the proposed ordinance is not subject to CEQA.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council introduce and waive the first reading of an ordinance amending Chapters 18.18 General Site Standards, 18.19 Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards, and 18.22 Standards for Special Uses and Activities of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code, and find the ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3).

The ordinance will be brought for a second reading at the next available regularly scheduled City Council meeting and will become effective 30 days after adoption.

Steve Carmona
SC:AB:EF:ca
Enclosure: 1) Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO
RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 18.18. GENERAL SITE STANDARDS, 18.19. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
STANDARDS AND 18.22. STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES AND
ACTIVITIES OF TITLE 18, ZONING CODE OF THE PICO RIVERA

MUNICIPAL CODE HEREIN REFERRED TO AS ZONE CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 200
WHEREAS, pursuant to its police power, the City of Pico Rivera may enact and enforce laws within its boundaries which promote the public health, morals, safety, or general welfare of the community, and are not in conflict with general laws; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65860, the legislative body of a city has the authority to adopt zoning ordinances to regulate land use in accordance with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Pico Rivera Municipal Code Section 18.06.020 et seq., the City of Pico Rivera’s zoning code or any portion thereof may be amended by ordinance of the City Council whenever the public necessity, convenience, or general welfare justify or deem essential; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pico Rivera identified the need to amend certain sections of Title 18, Zoning of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code to establish operational and aesthetic standards for thrift stores in compliance with State of California Assembly Bill 2632 (2024); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Pico Rivera conducted a public hearing on Zone Code Amendment No. 200, on June 15, 2026, and submitted findings to the City Council, pursuant to Pico Rivera Municipal Code (PRMC) Section

18.06.050.(C)(2); and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on June 23, 2026, considered the Planning Commission's recommendation, received public testimony, and reviewed all pertinent documents and materials, pursuant to PRMC Section 18.06.050; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed Zone Code Amendment No. 200 is consistent with the General Plan, complying with applicable state laws, and serves the public health, safety, and welfare.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera as follows:

Enclosure 1
1a
ORDINANCE NO. _____

Page 2 of 5 ends

SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as part of the findings.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) and CEQA Guidelines section 15060(c)(2) because the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, and because there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance would have direct physical change, or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change, in the environment.

SECTION 3. The City Council finds that the proposed amendments are consistent with the spirit and integrity of the General Plan and are necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the public.

SECTION 4. Amend Chapter 18.18. General Site Standards, Section

18.18.070(B)(2). Ground- or Wall-Mounted Equipment to read as follows:

2. Ground- or Wall-Mounted Equipment. All exterior ground- or wall-mounted equipment shall be prohibited within the front setback. Residential ground-mounted airconditioning units shall be installed along the rear building wall or side yard, provided that a three-foot side yard setback is maintained. Water heaters shall be placed along the rear half of the building and located within a metal or stucco enclosure painted to match their residence. Exposed vent pipes shall be painted to match the dwelling. All equipment and shall be screened from view using view-obscuring walls, fences, or hedges unless otherwise specified in this Subsection. Walls and fences shall match and/or complement the architectural style, color, material, or finish of the adjacent building or structure. Walls and fences shall be view-obscuring to screen views of equipment from a street and/or adjacent uses.
a. Exception. For single-family residential buildings, window-mounted airconditioning units without screening shall be permitted but shall be prohibited on the front and street side facing façades.
b. Exception. Electric vehicle charging equipment without screening in residential zones shall be permitted.

SECTION 5. Amend Chapter 18.19.

Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards, Section 18.19.020(E)(3) Paving, General to read as follows:

3. Paving, General. All parking and loading areas, including parking spaces and drive aisles, shall be paved with asphalt or concrete so as to prevent dust and mud.

Residential driveways shall not consist of asphaltic material. At the discretion of the Zoning Administrator, alternative vehicular rated materials may be substituted.

SECTION 6. Amend Chapter 18.22. Standards for Special Uses and Activities, Section 18.22.130(B)(1) to read as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. _____

Page 3 of 5 ends

B. Permit Requirements. Home occupations shall be permitted only as an accessory use to a residential dwelling subject to a Home Occupation Permit in accordance with Section 18.05.060 (Other Permits and Approvals).

1. A permit to operate a home occupation shall only be issued to the owner or occupant of the property, and such permit shall only be applicable and remain in effect so long as the applicant is a resident of the premises for which such permit is issued and shall not be transferable to any other person or property. Not more than one home occupation permit shall be issued for a dwelling.

2. The following businesses shall not operate out of a home and shall not be permitted by home occupation permits: alcohol sales, firearm and ammunition sales and services, on-site massage therapists, hairdressers, retail sales, vehicle storage, vehicle sales and vehicle repair, vehicle dispatch, furniture or cabinet making, commercial kennels, commercial stables, breeding facilities, forensic testing or as determined by the Zoning Administrator.

SECTION 7. Amend Chapter 18.22. Standards for Special Uses and Activities, Section 18.22.210. Thrift Stores to read as follows:

A. The following shall apply to new secondhand/thrift shops and as a requirement for approval of any increase in the floor area of an existing shop:

1. All sales and display of merchandise shall be permitted only within a building;

2. Exterior alterations to the premises and all signage must be designed and installed in compliance with all applicable City regulations and guidelines;

3. The building and site shall be maintained in a neat, clean and orderly condition;

4. Outside storage shall not be permitted;

5. The store shall not authorize the donation or drop-off of any goods while the store is closed; and

6. All donations and sorting activities shall take place indoors.

1. The building and site shall be maintained in a neat, clean and orderly condition.

2. Outside storage shall not be permitted.

3. Hours of operation shall be between 10:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.

4. Donations shall be accepted only during business hours.

5. All sales and displays of merchandise shall be permitted within a building only.

6. There shall be no drop-off of donated goods outside of business hours.

ORDINANCE NO. _____

Page 4 of 5 ends

8. All donation activity shall be conducted entirely indoors.

9. Any donated, discarded, or illegally dumped items left outside the building shall be removed immediately by operator.

11.Exterior alterations to the premises and all signage must be designed and installed in compliance with all applicable City regulations.

SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this article, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this article or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this article irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective. To this end, the provisions of this article are declared to be severable.

SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this ordinance. The City Council hereby finds and determines that there are no newspapers of general circulation both published and circulated within the City and, in compliance with Section 36933 of the Government Code directs the City Clerk to cause said ordinance, within fifteen (15) days after its passage, to be posted in at least five (5) public places within the City. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

ADOPTED AND PASSED this __ day of _____ 2026.
________________________________
Gustavo V. Camacho, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________ _________________________________ Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. _____

Page 5 of 5 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Cynthia Ayala, City Clerk of the City of Pico Rivera, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ____ was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera, held on ___________________, with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk
Tuesday, June 9, 2026
A regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chamber, Pico Rivera City Hall, 6615 Passons Boulevard, Pico Rivera, California.

Mayor Camacho called the regular meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. on behalf of the City Council.

PRESENT: Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
ABSENT: Garcia
*Councilmember Lara left the meeting at 6:56 p.m.

COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
• Yarisma Rocha, Planning Commission
• Bobbie Tanner, Veterans Commission
INVOCATION: Delivered by Pastor Drew from Hope Community Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Commissioner Rocha
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
• Certificates of Recognition were not presented and continued to the next City Council meeting.

PUBLIC HEARING:

City Council:

1. Public Hearing – Fiscal Year 2026-27 Preliminary (Proposed) Budget. (700) Mayor Camacho opened the public hearing and noted that there were no oral or written communication to provide public testimony.

Mayor Camacho closed the public hearing.

Mayor and members of the City Council discussed the potential impacts of Los Angeles County Measure ER, which appeared on the June Primary Election ballot, as well as the fiscal implications associated with the closure of the Golf Course.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Sanchez, seconded by Councilmember Lutz to: 1) Conduct a public hearing for the fiscal year (FY) 2026-27 Preliminary (Proposed) Budget; and 2) Receive and file the FY 2026-27 Preliminary (Proposed) Budget and provide direction to staff. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:
2 Back to Outline
6-9-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 2 of 9 ends

AYES: Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garcia

2. Public Hearing – Resolutions Related to the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2026-27. (700) Mayor Camacho opened the public hearing and noted that there were no oral or written communication to provide public testimony.

Mayor Camacho closed the public hearing.

Motion by Councilmember Lutz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Sanchez to: 1) Conduct a public hearing; 2) Approve Resolution No. 7480 approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Pico Rivera Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 1 for fiscal year (FY) 2026-27; and 3) Approve Resolution No. 7481 ordering the Collection of Assessments within the Pico Rivera Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 1 for FY 2026-27 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

Resolution No.7480 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 LEVY AND COLLECTION

OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PICO RIVERA LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
Resolution No.7481 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE COLLECTION

OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PICO RIVERA LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 AYES: Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garcia

3. Public Hearing – Resolutions Related to the Paramount/Mines Landscape Maintenance Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2026-27. (700) Mayor Camacho opened the public hearing and noted that there were no oral or written communication to provide public testimony.

Mayor Camacho closed the public hearing.

Motion by Councilmember Lutz, seconded by Councilmember Lara to: 1) Conduct a public hearing; 2) Approve Resolution No. 7482 approving the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Paramount/Mines Landscape Maintenance Assessment District for fiscal year (FY) 2026-27; and 3) Approve Resolution No. 7483 confirming the Diagram and Assessment and ordering the Levy of the FY 2026-27 Assessment for the 6-9-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 3 of 9 ends

Paramount/Mines Landscape Maintenance Assessment District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

Resolution No. 7482 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 LEVY AND COLLECTION OF

ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARAMOUNT/MINES LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
Resolution No. 7483 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND LEVYING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

ASSESSMENT FOR THE PICO RIVERA PARAMOUNT/MINES

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
AYES: Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garcia

4. Public Hearing – Status Update on Job Vacancies in Compliance with Assembly Bill 2561 – Local Public Employees. (200)
Mayor Camacho opened the public hearing and noted that there were no oral or written communication to provide public testimony.

Mayor Camacho closed the public hearing.

Motion by Councilmember Lutz, seconded by Councilmember Lara to a public hearing and receive and file the Status Update on Job Vacancies report. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garcia
PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Erik Diaz:
• Addressed the City Council on behalf of West Coast Arborists and expressed appreciation to the City Council for its consideration of Item No. 9, Award of Contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc. for Tree Maintenance Services.

Lauren Talbott:
• Addressed the City Council regarding upcoming library updates for the month of June.
6-9-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 4 of 9 ends

Jonathan Greyson:
• Addressed the City Council to express appreciation for the adoption of the SmokeFree Multi-Unit Housing Initiative through Ordinance No. 1208 at the May 26, 2026, City Council meeting.

Written communication was received by the following:

Robert Viera:
• Addressed the City Council to address concerns regarding overnight parking at Lowe’s and Ulta Beauty parking lots.

Mayor Camacho provided an update on the City's legislative advocacy efforts, including ongoing engagement with federal partners regarding the Whittier Narrows Dam Safety Modification Project and discussions with the offices of Senators Padilla and Schiff. Staff reported that more than 50 position letters have been submitted in support of the City’s Legislative Platform, including opposition to legislation affecting local control and support for measures related to public safety, housing, water infrastructure, Proposition 36 implementation, climate and emergency response funding, and affordable energy. He also highlighted ongoing coordination with the California Office of Grants and Local Services and reaffirmed the City’s commitment to advocating for policies and funding that benefit the Pico Rivera community.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS:

City Council:

5. Minutes:
• Approved City Council regular meeting of May 26, 2026

6. Approved 18th Warrant Register of the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year. (700) Check Numbers: 300736-300836
Special Check Numbers: None

7. General Municipal Election - November 3, 2026. (300)

1. Approved Resolution No. 7484 calling for the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities;

2. Approved Resolution No. 7485 requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles to render full services to the City of Pico Rivera relating to the conduct of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026;

3. Approved Resolution No. 7486 requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles to consolidate a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, with the El Rancho Unified School District and the Pico Water District election to be held on the date pursuant to § 10403 of the Elections Code;
6-9-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 5 of 9 ends

4. Approved Resolution No. 7487 adopting regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidate statements submitted to the voters at an election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; and

5. Approved Resolution No. 7488 providing for a procedure for determining by lot a tie among candidates at the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election in accordance with Elections Code Section 15651 and rescinding Resolution No. 7350.

Resolution No. 7484 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR THE HOLDING OF

A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 3, 2026, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS

REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES
Resolution No. 7485 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO RENDER FULL

SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A

GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 3, 2026
Resolution No. 7486 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO

CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2026, WITH THE EL RANCHO UNIFIED

SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE PICO WATER DISTRICT ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE PURSUANT TO § 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE
Resolution No. 7487 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES’

STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2026 Resolution No. 7488 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR A PROCEDURE

FOR DETERMINING BY LOT A TIE AMONG CANDIDATES AT THE
NOVEMBER 3, 2026 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 15651 AND
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 7350
6-9-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 6 of 9 ends

8. Approval and Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2026-27 GANN Appropriations Limit. (700)

1. Approved Resolution No. 7489 adopting the fiscal year 2026-27 GANN Appropriations Limit.

Resolution No. 7489 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

9. Award of Contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc. for Tree Maintenance Services. (500)
This item was pulled from the consent calendar for further clarification and discussion.

10. Amendment No. 1 to Maintenance Services Agreement No. 25-2428 with Tanko Lighting, Inc. (500)

1. Approved Amendment No. 1 to Maintenance Services Agreement No. 25- 2428 with Tanko Lighting Inc., increasing the contract amount by $154,000 for an annual amount of $459,000 to provide maintenance services for the City’s streetlight system for fiscal year (FY) 2025-26; and

2. Appropriated $154,000 from the Lighting Assessment District (Fund 230) for streetlighting maintenance services to Account No. 230.40.4990-54500 (Contracted Services) for the immediate installation of streetlight pole replacement, streetlight repairs, and continuation of streetlight maintenance services.

Agreement No. 25-2428-1

11. Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Review. (300)

1. Directed the City Clerk’s Office to notify City Departments and applicable Agencies to review their Conflict-of-Interest Code pertaining to designated employees to determine if any changes or amendments are necessary.

12. Cancellation of Regular City Council Meetings of August 11, 2026, and August 25, 2026. (100)

1. Approved the cancellation of the August 11, 2026 and August 25, 2026 City Council Regular meetings; and

2. Directed the City Clerk to post a Notice of Cancellation for both meetings.

13. Pico Rivera Major Corridors Median and Parkway Beautification Project, CIP No. 50075, CCL-5351(041) – Notice of Completion. (500)

1. Accepted the work as completed for the Pico Rivera Major Corridors Median and Parkway Beautification Project, CIP No. 50075, CCL-5351(041) constructed by Urban Habitat and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder; and

2. Authorized the City Manager to release the retention and all other monies due to Urban Habitat, following the mandatory waiting period from the date the Notice of Completion is recorded.
6-9-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 7 of 9 ends

14. Rosemead Boulevard Median and Parkway Beautification Project, CIP No. 50076, CCL-5351(042) – Notice of Completion. (500)

1. Accepted the work as completed for the Rosemead Boulevard Median and Parkway Beautification Project, CIP No. 50076, CCL-5351(042) constructed by Urban Habitat and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder; and

2. Authorized the City Manager to release the retention and all other monies due to Urban Habitat, following the mandatory waiting period from the date the Notice of Completion is recorded.

Motion by Councilmember Lutz, seconded by Councilmember Lara to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garcia
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION:

9. Award of Contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc. for Tree Maintenance Services. (500)
Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Sanchez recommended conducting additional research and due diligence as part of the selection process. She expressed concern with relying on another city's proposal as the sole basis for utilizing a piggyback agreement and suggested that the City undertake its own Request for Proposals (RFP) process to promote transparency and ensure a comprehensive evaluation of available options. She noted that the City has not conducted an RFP for these services since 2020, circumstances and market conditions have evolved since that time, and the current agreement remains in effect through August 2026.

Public Works Director Negrete clarified that the proposed piggyback agreement with the City of Rosemead includes a reduced rate. He further explained that City staff conducted a review of the City's service needs and compared them to the scope of services contained in the City of Rosemead's solicitation, ultimately determining that the proposal most closely aligned with the City's operational needs.

Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Sanchez requested to amend the recommendation to direct staff to procure tree maintenance services through the RFP process. Additionally, should the current agreement expire before a new contract is awarded, staff was directed to work with the existing vendor to continue providing services on a month-to-month basis until a new agreement is in place, seconded by Councilmember Lara.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Sanchez, seconded by Councilmember Lara to amend the recommendation to direct staff to procure tree maintenance services through the RFP process. Additionally, should the current agreement expire before a new contract is awarded, staff was directed to work with the existing vendor to continue providing services 6-9-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 8 of 9 ends

on a month-to-month basis until a new agreement is in place. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garcia
REGULAR AGENDA: None
CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS:

Public Works Director Negrete provided updates on several City projects. He reported that planning for the groundbreaking ceremony for the Smith Park Aquatic Center is underway, with the event tentatively scheduled for early July 2026 and construction anticipated to begin on July 6, 2026. He also stated that the Citywide Roadway Rehabilitation Project is currently out to bid, with contract award anticipated at the July 14 City Council meeting. The project specifications identify Loch Alene Avenue and Balfour Street as the first streets to be rehabilitated to ensure completion prior to the start of the school year.

GOOD OF THE ORDER (INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGENCY MEETINGS, AB 1234) Councilmember Lutz highlighted a recent visit by a leadership delegation from Fujian Province, People’s Republic of China, led by County Mayor Luo Tianjin and members of his delegation, and expressed hope that the relationship could lead to the establishment of a future sister city partnership. He also requested that staff explore the creation of a commemorative video in recognition of the upcoming Fourth of July and the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dr.

Sanchez.

Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Sanchez reported on her participation as a commencement speaker at Rio Hondo College and Vail High School in Montebello.

Mayor Camacho reported on his attendance at the United States Mayors Climate Protection Awards Luncheon, where he was recognized with the Small City Honorable Mention Award for the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan. He also highlighted the annual Pico Rivera GoGetters Softball Team versus Pico Rivera City Council and Employee Softball Team game, noting that the City Council and employee team emerged victorious.

ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Camacho adjourned the City Council regular meeting at 7:06 p.m. in memory of Ron Colosimo, long-time educator at Burke Steam Academy. There being no objection it was so ordered.

PRESENT: Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
ABSENT: Garcia, Lara
6-9-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 9 of 9 ends

_______________________________________
Gustavo V. Camacho, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct report of the proceedings of the City Council regular meeting dated June 9, 2026, and approved by the City Council on June 23, 2026.
________________________________
Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk
MEETING DATE: 06/23/26

CHECK DATE STARTING ENDING AMOUNT
CHECK NUMBERS: 5/29/26-6/11/26 300837 300953 $2,377,824.62 ACH NUMBERS: 5/29/26-6/11/26 20300 20369 $1,045,321.69
PRE-NOTE: 20337, 20367
TOTAL REGISTER AMOUNT: $ 3,423,146.31
19th WARRANT REGISTER OF THE 2025 - 2026 FISCAL YEAR
SPECIAL CHECKS/EFT:

VOIDED CHECKS: 300950
3 Back to Outline
Number Date Description Transaction Amount
300837 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $1,395.51
Invoice Amount
144186 $1,395.51
300838 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $7,475.09
Invoice Amount
132093 $7,475.09
300839 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $17,500.00
Invoice Amount
2026JUNERETAINER $17,500.00
300840 06/03/2026 06/04/2026 $120.00
Invoice Amount
2026ARBEXAM-AB $120.00
300841 06/03/2026 $714.00
Invoice Amount
146888-146893 YOGA WELLNESS & YOGALATES 5/4/26-5/28/26 $714.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST EXAM, 5/6/26
Accounts Payable BELTRAN, KATALINA
Description
CITY ATTORNEY RETAINER FEE, JUNE 2026
Accounts Payable BARRERA, ARMANDO
Description

AQMD BUYBACK PROGRAM, TRADED GAS EQUIPMENT
Accounts Payable Alvarez-Glasman & Colvin
Description
PORTABLE RESTROOMS FOR PURPLE HEART EVENT, 5/22/26
Accounts Payable Alan's Lawnmower & Garden Center
Description
CBC GenOpe - CBC General Operating
Check
Accounts Payable 1st Jon Inc
Description
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
user: April Zamora Pages: 1 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300842 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $1,501.50
Invoice Amount
SI-56877 $1,501.50
300843 06/03/2026 $500.00
Invoice Amount
06/17/26 $500.00
300844 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $1,315.70
Invoice Amount
8408298138 $1,315.70
300845 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $4,496.35
Invoice Amount
REPW26051106393 $4,496.35
300846 06/03/2026 06/12/2026 $11,872.00
Invoice Amount
SI-1303038 $11,872.00
300847 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $19,148.00
Invoice Amount

ESET PROTECT COMPLETE CLOUD
Accounts Payable CRAFTWATER ENGINEERING, INC.

Description
PW LIABILITY INSURANCE COLLECT THROUGH APRIL 2026
Accounts Payable CPACINC.COM
Description

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED CITYWIDE
Accounts Payable County of Los Angeles Dept of Public Works Description
DJ SVCS FOR FARMERS MARKET, 6/17/26
Accounts Payable CINTAS CORP.

Description

ERGONOMIC ASSESSMENT & REPORT FOR VARIOUS EMPLOYEES
Accounts Payable Bryan Ramirez (DJ Beatdrop)
Description
Accounts Payable Briotix Health, LP
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 2 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
25-067-5 $19,148.00
300848 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $20,353.26
Invoice Amount
2604172 $20,353.26
300849 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $1,804.09
Invoice Amount
W99446130102 $59.47
W99446130101 $1,744.62
300850 06/03/2026 06/08/2026 $811,157.50
Invoice Amount
13 $853,850.00
13-A ($42,692.50)
300851 06/03/2026 $100.00
Invoice Amount
867454 $100.00
300852 06/03/2026 06/12/2026 $5,130.00
Invoice Amount
Accounts Payable EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL, LLC
Description
Accounts Payable ELIZABETH LEARNING CENTER
Description

REFUND FOR DAMAGE DEPOSIT
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2026, WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2026, WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT

DROPSHIP LIFTGATE
MOBILE 12-SECTION CUBBY STORAGE ASSMB
Accounts Payable DOMINGUEZ GENERAL ENGINEERING
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2026, SMITH PARK AQUATIC CENTER Accounts Payable DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/30/26, REGIONAL TRAIL ENTRANCES Accounts Payable DAHLIN GROUP, INC
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 3 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
3800128432 $5,130.00
300853 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $2,852.94
Invoice Amount
30355450 $2,196.35
3017723 $599.25
301777 $57.34
300854 06/03/2026 06/08/2026 $19,534.67
Invoice Amount
0075941 $15,301.09
0075723 $3,976.28
0074906 $227.69
0074324-1 $1,333.43
CM919185-2 ($1,748.51)
0076797 $383.02
CM919185-1 ($3,057.48)
6134043 $97.78
6126017 $1,814.56
6126017-1 $186.34
6099272 $1,778.43
6097543 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL RE-PIPE $70.73

PLUMBING SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL RE-PIPE

PLUMBING SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION

CREDIT TO ACCOUNT

PLUMBING SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION

CREDIT TO ACCOUNT
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION

IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES

IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable Ferguson Enterprises, Inc
Accounts Payable Ewing Irrigation Products Inc
Description

IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
user: April Zamora Pages: 4 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
CM919185-3 ($1,017.69)
SC680692 $327.04
SC682235 $7.15
SC677451 $581.66
CM919249-2 ($391.90)
CM919249-1 ($600.05)
0074324-2 $265.10
300855 06/03/2026 06/12/2026 $465.00
Invoice Amount
9 $465.00
300856 06/03/2026 $1,200.00
Invoice Amount
0583 $1,200.00
300857 06/03/2026 06/08/2026 $201.78
Invoice Amount
IN516901 $201.78
300858 06/03/2026 06/12/2026 $55,307.08
Invoice Description Amount
Description

REACH SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC.

Description
FACE PAINTING SVCS & BALLOON ART FOR FARMER'S MARKET MAY 2026 Accounts Payable Gopher Sport, Gopher Performance, Moving Minds
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 4/27/26-5/27/26
Accounts Payable FUENTES, LILIANA

CREDIT TO ACCOUNT

MAINTENANCE SUPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION
Accounts Payable FOODCYCLE
SERVICE CHARGE FOR APRIL 2026
SERVICE CHARGE FOR JANUARY 2026

CREDIT TO ACCOUNT

CREDIT TO ACCOUNT
SERVICE CHARGE FOR MARCH 2026
user: April Zamora Pages: 5 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
GSI-PRSPAC-21 $19,472.80
GSI-PRSPAC-20 $35,834.28
300859 06/03/2026 06/08/2026 $13,515.20
Invoice Amount
1200826375 $13,515.20
300860 06/03/2026 06/08/2026 $2,500.00
Invoice Amount
2026 SCE SPONSOR $2,500.00
300861 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $977.37
Invoice Amount
013 (26-073) $977.37
300862 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $1,250.00
Invoice Amount
37852 $1,250.00
300863 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $3,400.00
Invoice Amount
321725 $3,400.00
Accounts Payable Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
Description
TRAINING WORKPLACE BULLYING-04/16/26
Accounts Payable Keenan & Associates
Description
BENEFIT BRIDGE FEE MAY 2026, INSTALLMENT 11 OF 12
Accounts Payable JMD (JM Diaz)
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2026, DURFEE AVE GRADE SEPARATION Accounts Payable HOLA MEXICO FILM FESTIVAL, LLC
Description

SCE SPONSORSHIP PAID TO PR AND REIMB TO HOLA
Accounts Payable HDR Engineering, Inc
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 3/29/26-5/2/26
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2026, SMITH PARK AQUATIC CENTER PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2026, SMITH PARK AQUATIC CENTER user: April Zamora Pages: 6 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300864 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $4,072.00
Invoice Amount
IN1573346 $719.00
IN1599026 $1,243.00
IN1589797 $2,110.00
300865 06/03/2026 $285.43
Invoice Amount
85551 $175.91
85664 $109.52
300866 06/03/2026 06/08/2026 $11,740.00
Invoice Amount
519433 $11,740.00
300867 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 $99,899.86
Invoice Amount
1 $105,157.75
1-A ($5,257.89)
300868 06/03/2026 06/11/2026 $2,888.81
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 4/20/26-5/7/26 ADA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Accounts Payable PageFreezer Software Inc.

Accounts Payable OrangeBlue General Contractors
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 4/20/26-5/7/26 ADA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Accounts Payable NV5, Inc.

Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2026, DESIGN SVCS FOR GALLATIN & PARAMT Description
WEEKLY ENROLLMENT NOTICES 5/6/26 & 5/13/26
WEEKLY ENROLLMENT NOTICES, 05/20 & 05/27
PUBLIC HEALTH PERMIT FOR CITY YARD 9633 BEVERLY

PUBLIC HEALTH PERMIT FOR SMITH PARK
Accounts Payable Minuteman Press
Accounts Payable Los Angeles County Department Public Health Description

PUBLIC HEALTH PERMIT FOR RIVERA PARK CONCESSION STAND
user: April Zamora Pages: 7 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
Invoice Amount
INV-21848 $2,888.81
300869 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $6,000.00
Invoice Amount
26-005 $6,000.00
300870 06/03/2026 06/11/2026 $1,711.93
Invoice Amount
2536690 $1,711.93
300871 06/03/2026 06/11/2026 $9,500.00
Invoice Amount
25/26-CK7-PM-SFS $9,500.00
300872 06/03/2026 06/08/2026 $7,675.00
Invoice Amount
3407 $7,675.00
300873 06/03/2026 $3,550.00
Invoice Amount
194 PLANT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR $3,550.00

WET SCRUB GYMNASIUM FLOOR WITH HILLYARD SUPER SHINE
Accounts Payable RIVERA ELECTRIC LLC
Description
POSTAGE FOR MONTHLY PROFILE, MAY 2026
Accounts Payable Pro Line Gym Floors, Inc
Description
GOLF CART LEASE 05/30/26-06/29/26
Accounts Payable Postmaster-Santa Fe Springs Post Office Description
CONSULTING SVCS FOR MAY 2026
Accounts Payable PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC
Description
PUBLIC RECORDS COMPLIANCE FOR SOCIAL MEDIA 6/6/26-6/5/27 Accounts Payable PM Law Enforcement Services, LLC
Description
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 8 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300874 06/03/2026 06/11/2026 $3,798.29
Invoice Amount
22648 $3,798.29
300875 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $1,061.69
Invoice Amount
APRIL2026-C $518.03
APRIL2026-A $260.38
APRIL2026-B $283.28
300876 06/03/2026 $9,126.36
Invoice Amount
2026-05-21-112 $9,126.36
300877 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $871.38
Invoice Amount
7100065705 $871.38
300878 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $4,490.00
Invoice Amount
912 $4,490.00
Accounts Payable SOUTHSTAR DCCM
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2026, TITLE VI ASSESSMENT
Accounts Payable SOUTHERN TIRE MART, LLC
Description

COMMERCIAL TIRES FOR CITY FLEET
Accounts Payable SHARED USE MOBILITY CENTER
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2026, ROSEWOOD CORRIDOR
UTILITIES SVC FOR 04/22/26-05/21/26
UTILITIES SVC FOR 04/22/26-/05/21/26
UTILITIES SVC FOR 04/22/26-/05/21/26

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR STREETS DIVISION
Accounts Payable San Gabriel Valley Water Co
Description
Accounts Payable Roadline Products Inc., USA
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 9 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300879 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $17,650.00
Invoice Amount
83085 $17,650.00
300880 06/03/2026 $70.00
Invoice Amount
052826DISCERT-EG $70.00
300881 06/03/2026 06/10/2026 $3,009.66
Invoice Amount
959323927-0526 $3,009.66
300882 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $452.72
Invoice Amount
43972 $452.72
300883 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $418.29
Invoice Amount
2190516804 $418.29
300884 06/03/2026 06/11/2026 Accounts Payable US Bank Corporate Trust Services $5,940.00 Accounts Payable UNIFIRST CORPORATION
Description

UNIFORM RENTAL SVCS
Accounts Payable Triangle Sports, Inc.

Description
DRI FIT A4 JERSEY 2 COLOR FRONT ON BACK
Accounts Payable T-Mobile USA, Inc
Description
CELL PHONE SVCS 04/21/26-05/20/26
Accounts Payable State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Description
DISTRIBUTION CERTIFICATE FOR ERICK GONZALEZ, GRADE D1
Accounts Payable SOUTHWEST PATROL, INC.

Description
SECURITY SERVICE, 04/29/26-05/12/26
user: April Zamora Pages: 10 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
Invoice Amount
8193721 $5,940.00
300885 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $5,294.25
Invoice Amount
244089 $5,294.25
300886 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $571.47
Invoice Amount
438510 $571.47
300887 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $6,499.24
Invoice Amount
3375 $6,499.24
300888 06/03/2026 06/09/2026 $3,960.00
Invoice Amount
2976 $3,960.00
300889 06/04/2026 06/10/2026 $525.80
Invoice Amount
060426 $525.80
Accounts Payable BMG Money, Inc
Description
EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION FOR P/E 05/29/26
Accounts Payable Z&K CONSULTANTS
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2026, CONSULTING ON PFAS AND WATER WELLS Accounts Payable Whittier Printing
Description
REACH YEARBOOKS 2026
Accounts Payable Whittier Fertilizer Company
Description

LANDSCAPE MATERIALS FOR PARK MAINTENANCE
Accounts Payable West Coast Arborists, Inc
Description
TREE TRIMMING SVCS 5/1/26-5/15/26
Description
ADMINISTRATION AND TRANSACTION FEES 5/1/26-4/30/27
user: April Zamora Pages: 11 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300890 06/04/2026 $4,142.60
Invoice Amount
105934 $4,142.60
300891 06/04/2026 $150.00
Invoice Amount
060426 $150.00
300892 06/04/2026 06/11/2026 $2,422.65
Invoice Amount
5/22/26 $2,422.65
300893 06/04/2026 06/09/2026 $26.53
Invoice Amount
060426 $26.53
300894 06/04/2026 06/11/2026 $377.83
Invoice Amount
060126 $377.90
060126-ADJ SUPPLEMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE FOR JUNE 2026-ADJUSTMENTS ($0.07) Accounts Payable NUFIC
Description
SUPPLEMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE FOR JUNE 2026
Accounts Payable Levying Officer
Description
EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION FOR P/E 05/29/26
Accounts Payable Kiko's Catering Service
Description
CATERING SVCS FOR THE PURPLE HEART MEMORIAL CEREMONY, 05/22/26 Accounts Payable Franchise Tax Board
Description
EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION FOR P/E 05/29/26
Accounts Payable CINDY'S JUMPER INC
Description

RENTAL OF TABLES AND CHAIRS
user: April Zamora Pages: 12 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300895 06/04/2026 06/12/2026 $3,167.27
Invoice Amount
060126 $3,157.22
060126-ADJ $10.05
300896 06/04/2026 06/11/2026 $230.87
Invoice Amount
060126 $230.90
060126-ADJ ($0.03)
300897 06/04/2026 06/09/2026 $568.01
Invoice Amount
161297513 $568.01
300898 06/10/2026 $154.00
Invoice Amount
146957 $154.00
300899 06/10/2026 $6,000.00
Invoice Amount
32382 $6,000.00
Accounts Payable Bickmore Actuarial
Description
ACTUARIAL REVIEW SVCS FOR FY 26/27 & FY 27/28
Accounts Payable ALVA, ELIZABETH
Description
STRENGTH TRAINING 05/06/26-05/27/26
Accounts Payable MECHANICAL GROUP
Description

AIR DUCT REPAIR AT CITY YARD
Description
DENTAL SERVICES (DHMO) FOR JUNE 2026
DENTAL SERVICES (DHMO) FOR JUNE 2026-ADJUSTMENTS
VISION SERVICES FOR JUNE 2026
VISION SERVICES FOR JUNE 2026-ADJUSTMENTS
Accounts Payable Western Dental Services, Inc.

Accounts Payable Standard Insurance Company
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 13 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300900 06/10/2026 $529.39
Invoice Amount
8512 $529.39
300901 06/10/2026 06/12/2026 $180.00
Invoice Amount
146967 $180.00
300902 06/10/2026 $3,755.83
Invoice Amount
8408363614 $289.08
8408363613 $484.23
8408363612 $1,315.70
8408363788 $1,666.82
300903 06/10/2026 $30.00
Invoice Amount
872577 $30.00
300904 06/10/2026 $6,456.04
Invoice Amount
RE-PW25111002532 $6,456.04
Accounts Payable County of Los Angeles Dept of Public Works Description
PW LIABILITY INSURANCE COLLECT THROUGH OCTOBER 2025
Accounts Payable CORONEL, MONICA
Description

REFUND FOR FLOWER ARRANGING

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED CITYWIDE

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED CITYWIDE
Accounts Payable CINTAS CORP.

Description

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED GOLF COURSE Accounts Payable CASTANEDA, MARIA, JUANA
Description
ZUMBA DANCE 05/04/26-05/18/26
Accounts Payable Big City Print
Description

SMALL AND LARGE OUTDOOR SIGNS
user: April Zamora Pages: 14 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300905 06/10/2026 $15,875.00
Invoice Amount
PIC2526-04 $15,875.00
300906 06/10/2026 $16,543.50
Invoice Amount
99072042601 $16,543.50
300907 06/10/2026 $16,137.78
Invoice Amount
W99684270101 $16,137.78
300908 06/10/2026 06/12/2026 $180.00
Invoice Amount
110325CBPELSG-GE $180.00
300909 06/10/2026 06/12/2026 $425.00
Invoice Amount
INV0067 $425.00
300910 06/10/2026 Accounts Payable ESPINOZA, JORGE & LETICIA $4,950.00 Accounts Payable ESCAMILLA FAMILIA ENTERPRISES
Description
250 PALETAS FOR THE EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION LUNCHEON, 06/11/26 Accounts Payable EDWARDS, GENE
Description
REIMBURSE CA PROF CIVIL ENGINEER'S LIC RENEWAL, 11/3/25 Accounts Payable DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY
Description

REACH SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES-INTERNAL

SERVICES DEPT
Description
LARIAC 8 SVCS 04/01/26-04/30/26
Accounts Payable County of Los Angeles Probation Dept
Description
PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION PROGRAM 4/1/26-5/14/26
user: April Zamora Pages: 15 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
Invoice Amount
PI-2585835 $4,950.00
300911 06/10/2026 $9,978.53
Invoice Amount
153524 $9,978.53
300912 06/10/2026 $274.39
Invoice Amount
SC679117 $274.39
300913 06/10/2026 06/11/2026 $574.57
Invoice Amount
4K+3X1080P $574.57
300914 06/10/2026 $13,031.85
Invoice Amount
IN519672 $13,031.85
300915 06/10/2026 $3,167.80
Invoice Amount
IN7105411814 $3,167.80
Accounts Payable GoTo Communications, Inc.

Description
STANDARD PLUS BUNDLE-MONTHLY SVCS,06/01/26-06/30/26
Accounts Payable Gopher Sport, Gopher Performance, Moving Minds
Description

REACH SPORTS AND OUTDOOR SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable FLORES, JONATHAN
Description

REIMBURSEMENT FOR THREE ILLEGAL FIREWORK ENFORCEMENT CAMERAS Accounts Payable Ferguson Enterprises, Inc
Description
SERVICE CHARGE FOR FEBRUARY 2026
Accounts Payable EXPRESS MOBILE WELDING SUPPLY, INC
Description

WELDER MACHINE FOR MECHANIC SHOP
Description
WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUND, 9233 1/2 CHARLESWORTH RD
user: April Zamora Pages: 16 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300916 06/10/2026 $2,060.87
Invoice Amount
28917 $2,060.87
300917 06/10/2026 $400.00
Invoice Amount
181426 $400.00
300918 06/10/2026 $12,006.12
Invoice Amount
33126P $12,006.12
300919 06/10/2026 $5,797.91
Invoice Amount
311189 $4,460.59
311188 $1,260.22
311555 $77.10
300920 06/10/2026 $3,955.95
Invoice Amount
66215 $1,180.00
Description
TRANSPORTATION TO PETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM 06/04/26
MAIL PREP SVCS MAY 2026
SUPPORT FEE MAY 2026
Accounts Payable Inland Empire Stages, LTD
Accounts Payable InfoSend, Inc
Description
POSTAGE FOR MAY 2026
Accounts Payable Heart of Compassion
Description
REIMBURSEMENT FOR CDBG EXPENSE Q3 FY 25/26, DEC. 2025-FEB. 2026 Accounts Payable GUZMAN ALAS, ULISES, DANIEL
Description
4 HOUR PHOTO BOOTH RENTAL
Accounts Payable GREEN PRO SOLUTIONS
Description

DEGREASER FOR ASPHALT TRUCK
user: April Zamora Pages: 17 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
66080 $2,775.95
300921 06/10/2026 $3,625.98
Invoice Amount
PI-2586178 $3,625.98
300922 06/10/2026 $760.17
Invoice Amount
014 (26-094) $760.17
300923 06/10/2026 $7,950.77
Invoice Amount
OE110-0004363-PI $7,950.77
300924 06/10/2026 $845,055.45
Invoice Amount
262953AY $18,600.80
262955AY $17,864.71
262954AY $7,727.03
263109AY $800,862.91
300925 06/10/2026 Accounts Payable LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING LLC $586.96 PRV-TRANSIT/TRANSIENT DEPUTY SPECIAL EVENTS 4/2/26-4/28/26 PRV-PROBLEM SOLVING POLICING, SPECIAL EVENTS 3/18/26-3/31/26 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS MAY 2026
Accounts Payable LA County Sheriffs Department
Description
PRV-PROBLEM SOLVING POLICING, SPECIAL EVENTS 4/1/26-4/30/26 Accounts Payable KYA Services LLC
Description

FIELD DRAINAGE REMEDIATION, SMITH PARK
Accounts Payable JMD (JM Diaz)
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MAY 2026, DURFEE GRADE SEPARATION MT DRAIN Accounts Payable JESSE SALINAS & NATALIE HERNANDEZ
Description
WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUND, 9513 MELITA ST
TRANSPORTATION TO SAN DIEGO ZOO SAFARI PARK, 5/30/26
user: April Zamora Pages: 18 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
Invoice Amount
20372479 $586.96
300926 06/10/2026 $1,349.25
Invoice Amount
4491 $1,349.25
300927 06/10/2026 $1,292.85
Invoice Amount
005985 $1,292.85
300928 06/10/2026 $177.81
Invoice Amount
2026201 $177.81
300929 06/10/2026 $475.00
Invoice Amount
453747 $475.00
300930 06/10/2026 $165.56
Invoice Amount
19754 $165.56
Accounts Payable NATIONAL TRUCK 'N' TRAILER, LLC
Description

JACK HAMMER REPAIR
Accounts Payable Musco Sports Lighting, LLC
Description
CONTROL LINK SVC FEES JUNE 2026- JUNE 2027
Accounts Payable MCA Direct LLC
Description
REAM (500 SHEETS) PAPER
Accounts Payable M's Flowers
Description

FRESH FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS AND WREATH, VET MONUMENT
Accounts Payable League of California Cities
Description
LA COUNTY DIVISION DUES, 7/1/26-6/30/27
Description
PLOTTER AND TRIUMPH JUNE 2026
user: April Zamora Pages: 19 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300931 06/10/2026 $230.00
Invoice Amount
2154578 $230.00
300932 06/10/2026 $4,141.17
Invoice Amount
025425 $4,141.17
300933 06/10/2026 $10,000.00
Invoice Amount
2024-00002002 $10,000.00
300934 06/10/2026 $27,331.86
Invoice Amount
2026JUNEPICOWD-B $18,733.49
2026JUNEPICOWD-A $8,598.37
300935 06/10/2026 $10,656.93
Invoice Amount
INV31 PB SYSTEM, SUBSCRIPTION $10,656.93
UTILITIES FOR 04/14/26-05/13/26
Accounts Payable PlanetBids, Inc.

Description
Accounts Payable Pico Water District
Description
UTILITIES FOR 04/14/26-05/13/26
Accounts Payable PEREZ, EDUARDO & MARIANA
Description
WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUND, 8908 ISORA ST
Accounts Payable PB Loader Corporation
Description

ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR WATER & STREET DIVISION
Accounts Payable Pacific Telemanagement Services (PTS)
Description
PAY PHONES AT CITY HALL & PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR JUNE 2026
user: April Zamora Pages: 20 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300936 06/10/2026 $276.25
Invoice Amount
28267 $276.25
300937 06/10/2026 $9,500.00
Invoice Amount
2026-02 $9,500.00
300938 06/10/2026 $2,743.20
Invoice Amount
25-030-001 $2,743.20
300939 06/10/2026 $30.00
Invoice Amount
872588 $30.00
300940 06/10/2026 $37,125.00
Invoice Amount
INV#14543 $37,125.00
300941 06/10/2026 $172.49
Invoice Amount
SHOTSPOTTER SUBSCRIPTION SVCS FOR PHASE III, 6/24/26-6/23/27 Accounts Payable South Coast Air Quality Mgmt Dist
Description

REFUND FOR FLOWER ARRANGING
Accounts Payable SOUNDTHINKING, INC.

Description

PLANT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
Accounts Payable RODRIGUEZ, JACQUELINE
Description

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SVCS FOR THE WORLD SPIRIT FESTIVAL Accounts Payable RIVERA ELECTRIC LLC
Description

GRANITE DEDICATION PLAQUE FOR ALEBRIJE DOG PARK
Accounts Payable PUBLIC MATTERS LLC
Description
Accounts Payable Preferred Impressions, Inc
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 21 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
4725171 $172.49
300942 06/10/2026 $25,850.00
Invoice Amount
83162 $25,850.00
300943 06/10/2026 $477.26
Invoice Amount
97207 $477.26
300944 06/10/2026 $81.00
Invoice Amount
146930-146934 $81.00
300945 06/10/2026 $2,755.00
Invoice Amount
52596206 $2,755.00
300946 06/10/2026 $3,841.25
Invoice Amount
1069 CATERING SVCS FOR EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION LUNCHEON 06/11/26 $3,841.25 PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 6/3/26, PR WM REPLACEMENT
Accounts Payable Tom's Tailgate LLC
Description
ACTING WORKSHOP SCENE STUDY, 05/13/26-05/27/26
Accounts Payable Tetra Tech, Inc
Description
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SVCS, MAY 2026
Accounts Payable TAMEZ, VICTORIA, ANN
Description
SECURITY SERVICE, 05/13/26-05/31/26
Accounts Payable Specialized Elevator Corporation
Description
AQMD FEES FOR GENERATOR-PARKS & RECREATION, JULY 2025- JUNE 2026 Accounts Payable SOUTHWEST PATROL, INC.

Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 22 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
300947 06/10/2026 $1,020.00
Invoice Amount
17316 $1,020.00
300948 06/10/2026 $1,818.00
Invoice Amount
CINV-045638 $1,818.00
300949 06/10/2026 $30.00
Invoice Amount
872589 $30.00
300950 06/10/2026 06/10/2026 $20,000.00
Invoice Amount
082126-DEPOSIT $20,000.00
300951 06/10/2026 $4,355.90
Invoice Amount
S08468687 $4,355.90
300952 06/10/2026 $3,000.00
Invoice Amount

DELL EQUIPMENT FOR IT DEPARTMENT
Accounts Payable Xentina Digital Group
Description
DEPOSIT FOR PERFORMANCE ON 8/21/26
Accounts Payable xByte Technologies, Inc.

Description

REFUND FOR FLOWER ARRANGING
Accounts Payable WALKING DISTANCE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Description
ACA JUNE 2026
Accounts Payable VIZCARRA, MARIA
Description

PICO RIVERA INNOVATIVE MUNICIPAL ENERGY
Accounts Payable TRUSAIC
Description
Accounts Payable Tripepi, Smith and Associates, Inc.

Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 23 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
1269-051826 $3,000.00
300953 06/11/2026 $550.00
Invoice Amount
05/30/26 $550.00
$2,377,824.62
20300 06/01/2026 $7,730.08
Invoice Amount
597126161 $7,730.08
20301 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 $1,070.94
Invoice Amount
Import - 30484 $1,070.94
20302 06/01/2026 $102.36
Invoice Amount
Import - 30485 $102.36
20303 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 $69,915.46
Invoice Amount
Accounts Payable So Calif Edison Company
Description
Accounts Payable Frontier California
Description
Phone Svc for MAY 2026
Accounts Payable So Calif Gas Company
Description
UTILITIES-GAS SVCS APRIL 2026
Accounts Payable I Copy, Inc (ibe digital)
Description
COPIER LEASE MAY 2026
DJ SVCS FOR EMPLOYEE LUNCHEON, 06/11/26
Type Check Totals:

EFT
CITY OF PR WEB DESIGN INSTALLMENTS 1 OF 6
Accounts Payable Bryan Ramirez (DJ Beatdrop)
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 24 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
Import - 30486 $69,915.46
20304 06/03/2026 $115,256.85
Invoice Amount
SA51826 $39,677.68
SA42726 $49,615.24
SA51826-05.13.26 $19,702.50
SA5426 $6,261.43
20305 06/03/2026 $2,300.00
Invoice Amount
014435 $2,300.00
20306 06/03/2026 $561.60
Invoice Amount
147016-147018 $561.60
20307 06/03/2026 $90.00
Invoice Amount
SPRGWK11'26 $90.00
20308 06/03/2026 Accounts Payable CHICOBAG COMPANY $6,718.81 Accounts Payable Bland, Renee
Description
UMPIRE SVCS 5/28/26
Accounts Payable BAUTISTA, LISSETTE, G.

Description
STRONG NATION HIIT CLASSES 5/5/26-5/21/26
Accounts Payable A & D Transportation, L.P.

Description
BUS TRANSPORTATION TO EL RANCHO HS, 5/20/26
CHECK REGISTER 4/22/26 & PAYROLL PERIOD 4/17/26
CHECK REGISTER 5/13/26
CHECK REGISTER 4/29/26
Accounts Payable (Troon) Indigo Sports, LLC
Description
CHECK REGISTER 5/20/26 & PAYROLL PERIOD 5/15/26
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2026
user: April Zamora Pages: 25 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
Invoice Amount
INV/2026/00566 $6,718.81
20309 06/03/2026 $10,570.61
Invoice Amount
CL61836 $10,570.61
20310 06/03/2026 $1,174.50
Invoice Amount
38332 $1,174.50
20311 06/03/2026 $44,255.00
Invoice Amount
91/605/405-25/26 $20,000.00
2025-2026 MEMBER $24,255.00
20312 06/03/2026 $568.68
Invoice Amount
INV31120001899 $221.78
INV31120002158 $250.00
INV31520001286 $96.90

SAFETY SHOES FOR MICHAEL CUELLAR

SAFETY SHOES FOR PAUL HERNANDEZ

SAFETY SHOES FOR DARRELL RODRIGUEZ
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES FY 25/26
Accounts Payable GCP WW HOLDCO LLC
Description
Accounts Payable GATEWAY CITIES COUNCIL OF

GOVERNMENTS
Description
LOCAL AGENCY PARTICIPATION 91/605/405 MAJOR CORRIDOR STUDY 25-26 Accounts Payable Eastern County Newspaper Group, Inc.

Description

LEGAL AD FOR ZONE CODE AMENDMENT
Accounts Payable Cosby Oil Company
Description
FUEL FOR CITY FLEET 5/11/26-5/20/26
Description

VITA POLYESTER QUICK TURN SCREENPRINT BAG AND POUCH
user: April Zamora Pages: 26 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
20313 06/03/2026 $18.27
Invoice Amount
492700 $18.27
20314 06/03/2026 $18,880.00
Invoice Amount
3740856 $9,794.00
3572958 $9,086.00
20315 06/03/2026 $800.00
Invoice Amount
PIC-0059 $800.00
20316 06/03/2026 $28,135.75
Invoice Amount
PR1PLD12602 $631.75
PR1PLD12603 $1,105.75
PR1MS412602 $9,818.25
PR1MS412603 $16,580.00
20317 06/03/2026 $908.89
Invoice Amount
NPDES PROGRAM SVCS, 03/01/26-03/31/26
Accounts Payable Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc
Description
PLAN CHECK SVCS, 02/01/26-02/28/26
PLAN CHECK SVCS 03/01/26-03/31/26
NPDES PROGRAM SVCS, 02/01/26-02/28/26
PUBLIC HEARING SOFTWARE 6/1/26-7/1/26
Accounts Payable John L Hunter & Associates Inc.

Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2026, RIO HONDO PARKS SOCCER FIELD Accounts Payable Jason Sperling DBA People Speak, LLC
Description
Accounts Payable Interwest Consulting Group
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2026, RIO HONDO PARKS SOCCER FIELD Accounts Payable I Copy, Inc (ibe digital)
Description
TONER
user: April Zamora Pages: 27 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
35581188 $908.89
20318 06/03/2026 $1,394.23
Invoice Amount
20334688 $1,394.23
20319 06/03/2026 $110.00
Invoice Amount
CITYVSGOGET'26 $110.00
20320 06/03/2026 $333,331.89
Invoice Amount
062026-NASA SVCS $333,331.89
20321 06/03/2026 $86,118.40
Invoice Amount
35372 $63,809.26
35373 $22,309.14
20322 06/03/2026 $20,253.00
Invoice Amount
42911 $20,253.00
Description
HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEAN UP, 4789 PARAMOUNT BLVD
SWEEPING SVCS FEBRUARY 2026
BUS STOP SVCS FEBRUARY 2026
Accounts Payable Ocean Blue Environmental Services, Inc RUBBISH ASSESSMENT FOR JUNE 2026
Accounts Payable Nationwide Environmental Services
Description
UMPIRE SVCS 5/29/26
Accounts Payable NASA Services Inc
Description
PARKS & REC COPIER JUNE 2026
Accounts Payable Martinez, Ben
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/30/26, HSIP CYCLE 11
Accounts Payable LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING LLC
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 28 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
20323 06/03/2026 $500.00
Invoice Amount
012ST1-4785390 $250.00
995ST1-4348960 $250.00
20324 06/03/2026 $500.00
Invoice Amount
2026-001213 $500.00
20325 06/03/2026 $314.07
Invoice Amount
S100270976.001 $314.07
20326 06/03/2026 $741.00
Invoice Amount
147060 $741.00
20327 06/03/2026 $8,021.87
Invoice Amount
127749 $3,731.50
127779 CLAIMS ADMIN FEES JUNE 2026 $4,290.37
Accounts Payable Tristar Risk Management
Description
GENERAL LIABILITY FEES JUNE 2026
Accounts Payable Serrano, Leon
Description
TIKI TAKA SOCCER U2-3, 5/6/26-5/27/26
Accounts Payable S & J Supply Co., Inc.

Description

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION
Accounts Payable Rousselle Company Inc.

Description

ADDITIONAL TRAPS AT CHW TRASH ENCLOSURE
Description

SAFETY SHOES FOR RUBEN CASTANDEDA

SAFETY SHOES FOR GERRY BURIEL
Accounts Payable Red Wing Shoe Store
user: April Zamora Pages: 29 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
20328 06/03/2026 $613.21
Invoice Amount
6456283 $613.21
20329 06/03/2026 $5,811.00
Invoice Amount
W6D1481 $45.00
W6D1612 $200.00
W6E0209 $45.00
W6E0211 $45.00
W6E1033 $200.00
W6E1030 $210.00
W6E1031 $135.00
W6E1032 $225.00
W6E1198 $45.00
W6E1197 $45.00
W6E1199 $45.00
W6E1250 $45.00
W6E1251 $45.00
W6E1249 $45.00
W6E1252 $200.00

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

ASPHALT MAINTENANCE
Accounts Payable Weck Laboratories Inc.

Description
Accounts Payable Vulcan Materials Co.

Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 30 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
W6D0787 $390.00
W6D0892 $130.00
W6B1163 $836.00
W6B1169 $70.00
W6B1164 $300.00
W6B1168 $70.00
W6B1166 $70.00
W6E0210 $45.00
W6D1061 $200.00
W6D1062 $45.00
W6D1060 $700.00
W5K0260 $70.00
W5K0265 $70.00
W5K0266 $70.00
W5K0259 $70.00
W5K0263 $300.00
W5K0258 $70.00
W5K0267 $70.00
W5K0262 $70.00
W5K0261 $210.00
W6D1355 $200.00
W6D1334 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING $90.00

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
user: April Zamora Pages: 31 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
W6D1483 $45.00
W6D1482 $45.00
20330 06/03/2026 $330.34
Invoice Amount
1283680-00 $330.34
20331 06/03/2026 $34,363.52
Invoice Amount
00632010 $3,344.50
00631907 $8,275.00
00631907-A $925.00
00632262 $20,907.02
00632444 $845.00
00632009 $67.00
20332 06/04/2026 $8,642.94
Invoice Amount
060426 $8,642.94
20333 06/04/2026 $1,143.68
Invoice Description Amount
Description
EMPLOYEE/EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS FOR P/E 05/29/26 (401A) Accounts Payable Nationwide RS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 5/1/26, GENERATOR UPGRADE
PROF SVCS FROM THRU 02/27/26,PR GENERATOR UPGADE ELECTRICAL PLAN Accounts Payable Nationwide Retirement Solutions
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 2/27/26, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SVCS PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 2/27/26, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SVCS PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/3/26, OVERLAY
Accounts Payable Willdan Engineering
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 2/27/26, OVERLAY
Accounts Payable Western Water Works Supply Company
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
user: April Zamora Pages: 32 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
060426 $1,143.68
20334 06/04/2026 $728.00
Invoice Amount
060426 $728.00
20335 06/04/2026 $1,972.85
Invoice Amount
060426 $1,972.85
20336 06/04/2026 $123.00
Invoice Amount
060426 $123.00
20338 06/02/2026 $275.34
Invoice Amount
Import - 30487 $275.34
20339 06/02/2026 $196.27
Invoice Amount
Import - 30488 $196.27
Description
UTILITIES-GAS SVCS APRIL 2026
Description
Phone Svc for MAY 2026
Accounts Payable So Calif Gas Company
Description
COPE FEES FOR P/E 05/29/26
Accounts Payable Frontier California
Description
UNION DUES FOR P/E 05/29/26
Accounts Payable SEIU Local 721-COPE
Description
UNION DUES FOR P/E 05/29/26
Accounts Payable SEIU Local 721
PEHP BENEFIT/DEDUCTION FOR P/E 05/29/26
Accounts Payable PRMPCEA
user: April Zamora Pages: 33 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
20340 06/03/2026 $1,616.64
Invoice Amount
Import - 30489 $1,616.64
20341 05/14/2026 05/31/2026 ($200.00)
Invoice Amount
20260427-240 ($200.00)
20342 05/14/2026 05/31/2026 $200.00
Invoice Amount
20260427-241 $200.00
20343 05/14/2026 05/31/2026 $356.00
Invoice Amount
20260427-242 $356.00
20344 05/14/2026 05/31/2026 $259.29
Invoice Amount
20260427-243 $259.29
20345 05/14/2026 05/31/2026 $33.45
Invoice Amount
Accounts Payable US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard) Description
A refund was processed in error. The GL Codes reflect the origin Accounts Payable US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard) Description
Attendance to the 2026 Water Safety Summit in preparation for th Accounts Payable US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard) Description
Airfare for attendance to the 2026 Water Safety Summit in prepar Panelist Lunch for Analyst (Parks & Recreation) interviews. Ther Accounts Payable US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard) Description
Description

WATER SVC
Accounts Payable US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard) Description
Accounts Payable City of Pico Rivera
user: April Zamora Pages: 34 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
20260427-244 $33.45
20346 05/14/2026 05/31/2026 $123.00
Invoice Amount
20260427-245 $123.00
20347 05/14/2026 05/31/2026 $441.98
Invoice Amount
20260427-246 $441.98
20348 05/14/2026 05/31/2026 $946.91
Invoice Amount
20260427-247 $946.91
20349 06/05/2026 $40,392.69
Invoice Amount
Import - 30498 $40,392.69
20350 06/08/2026 $1,900.00
Invoice Amount
Import - 30499 $1,900.00
City Polo purchase for Public Works Engineering & Non-Yard Staff Due to the HVAC system being out at the Parks & Recreation Admin Accounts Payable US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard) Description
Final mandatory meeting at the Slab Factory related to the fabri Accounts Payable US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard) Description
Supplies for mandatory staff meeting. /SQ *DOLLAR KING PICO RIVE Accounts Payable US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard) Description
Description
Radio & Telecommunication
Description
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2026
Accounts Payable Frontier California
Accounts Payable So Calif Edison Company
user: April Zamora Pages: 35 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
20351 06/08/2026 $592.37
Invoice Amount
Import - 30500 $592.37
20352 06/09/2026 $292.02
Invoice Amount
Import - 30501 $292.02
20353 06/10/2026 $7,928.11
Invoice Amount
SA6126 $7,928.11
20354 06/10/2026 $41.96
Invoice Amount
323364-00 $41.96
20355 06/10/2026 $504.47
Invoice Amount
9160-26 $504.47
20356 06/10/2026 $3,627.90
Invoice Description Amount
Description

CITY SEAL HARD ENAMEL AND GOLD FINISH PINS
Accounts Payable Eastern County Newspaper Group, Inc.

Description

PLANT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable American Marker
Description
CHECK REGISTER 5/27/26
Accounts Payable AAA Electrical Supply, Inc.

Description
Radio & Telecommunication
Accounts Payable (Troon) Indigo Sports, LLC
Description

RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Accounts Payable Frontier California
Accounts Payable Verizon Wireless
user: April Zamora Pages: 36 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
38353 $1,239.75
38348 $2,388.15
20357 06/10/2026 $250.00
Invoice Amount
INV30220002707 $175.07
INV31120002213 $74.93
20358 06/10/2026 $1,038.80
Invoice Amount
0555214 $256.43
0555090 $29.97
0555091 $10.25
0553899 $20.54
0553901 $56.78
0553902 $293.77
0553900 $121.78
0553903 $31.15
0553904 $94.18
0553905 $113.04
0553906 $10.91
STORAGE FOR BUILDING DIVISION, MAY 2026
INITIAL MOVE-IN FEE, MAY 2026
STORAGE FOR CITY CLERK MAY 2026
STORAGE FOR PARKS AND RECREATION, MAY 2026
STORAGE FOR PW, MAY 2026
ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE FEE, MAY 2026
STORAGE FOR CED, MAY 2026
MONTHLY STORAGE FOR FINANCE, MAY 2026
MONTHLY SHREDDING SVCS MAY 2026
STORAGE FOR HOUSING DIVISION MAY 2026
STORAGE FOR HOUSING REHAB, MAY 2026

SAFETY SHOES FOR ALEX RAICH
Accounts Payable GRM Information Management Services, Inc Description
Accounts Payable GCP WW HOLDCO LLC
Description

SAFETY SHOES FOR ALEX RAICH
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ZONE CODE AMENDMENT NO.200
ASSEMBLY BILL 2561 (AB 2561) COMPLIANCE NOTICE OF PUBLC HEARING user: April Zamora Pages: 37 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
20359 06/10/2026 $4,800.00
Invoice Amount
26-005A $4,800.00
20360 06/10/2026 $90.00
Invoice Amount
SPRGWK12'26 $90.00
20361 06/10/2026 $1,100.00
Invoice Amount
2026-001319 $1,100.00
20362 06/10/2026 $92.09
Invoice Amount
65635184420526 $92.09
20363 06/10/2026 $116.65
Invoice Amount
199824696 $116.65
20364 06/10/2026 $1,828.44
Invoice Description Amount
Description

LONG POLY MAILERS
Accounts Payable Vulcan Materials Co.

Description

PAINT SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES DEPARTMENT
Accounts Payable Uline
Description
PEST CONTROL SVCS MAY 2026
Accounts Payable The Sherwin-Williams Co.

Description
OFFICIATING SVCS 6/04/26
Accounts Payable Rousselle Company Inc.

Description
HOMELESS LIAISON SVCS 5/16/26-5/31/26
Accounts Payable Martinez, Ben
Accounts Payable HOMELESS OUTREACH, LLC
user: April Zamora Pages: 38 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
6492547 $278.33
6493455 $359.43
6536623 $276.94
6493668 $286.11
6585384 $418.88
6565325 $208.75
20365 06/10/2026 $151,327.28
Invoice Amount
3853-0426 $151,327.28
20366 06/10/2026 $9,735.50
Invoice Amount
00342523 $149.00
00342524 $107.50
00342525 $211.25
00632108 $9,267.75
20368 06/10/2026 $1,264.24
Invoice Amount
Import - 30502 UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2026 $1,264.24
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/3/26, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SVCS Accounts Payable So Calif Edison Company
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 5/1/26, HSIP11 CITYWIDE TS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 5/1/26, HSIP11 CITYWIDE SIGNS PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 5/1/26, MASTER PLAN
GROUNDWATER PRODUCTION AND ASSESSMENT APRIL 2026
Accounts Payable Willdan Engineering
Description

ASPHALT MAINTENANCE
Accounts Payable Water Replenishment District of So. California Description

ASPHALT MAINTENANCE

ASPHALT MAINTENANCE
user: April Zamora Pages: 39 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 Number Date Description Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/29/2026 - To Payment Date: 6/11/2026 Source Payee Name
20369 06/11/2026 $79.49
Invoice Amount
Import - 30503 $79.49
$1,045,321.69
Checks
EFTs
All
$3,423,146.31
$1,045,321.69
Transaction Amount
Transaction Amount
$2,377,824.62
Transaction Amount
Grand Totals:

Phone Svc for MAY 2026
Type EFT Totals:

CBC GenOpe - CBC General Operating Totals
Accounts Payable Frontier California
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 40 of 40 Monday, June 15, 2026 To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Meeting Date: June 23, 2026
Subject: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2) OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution adopting the fiscal year (FY) 2026-27 Operating Budget and Year Two (2) of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Budget; and

2. Approve a resolution adopting the updated General Fund and Proprietary Fund reserve policies (Exhibits A and B).

Strategic Priority:
1 - Fiscal & Organizational Sustainability - Create a City government built to adapt to change.

Strategy:

1.1 Build a more transparent and sustainable fiscal system to improve trust and efficiency.

Fiscal Impact:

The Proposed Budget includes total revenues of $146,611,985 and total expenditures of $140,248,322 for FY 2026-27. The General Fund (GF) portion of this Proposed Budget totals $65,033,128 in revenues and expenditures for FY 2026-27.

Background:

The development of the City of Pico Rivera’s (City) Proposed FY 2026-27 Two-Year (Biennial) Budget began in December 2025, coinciding with the finalization of the FY 2024-25 financial statement audit. FY 2026-27 is “Year Two” of the Biennial Budget. It reflects the City Council’s strategic priorities and policy direction, ensuring that resources are effectively aligned to support the community’s needs. The budget also serves as an important communication tool, ensuring the City operates in a fiscally responsible and transparent manner and that resources are allocated effectively to provide high-quality 4 Back to Outline
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 2 of 13 ends

services to the community. The budget is also an evaluation tool that compares commitments made in the previous year’s budget with actual accomplishments. Using the City Council Strategic Priorities as a guide, the discussion below provides the framework for developing the FY 2026-27 revenues and expenditures.

On February 10, 2026, the City Council adopted the recommended Budget Calendar with the following key dates:

The Preliminary Budget for FY 2026-27 was successfully presented on the following dates to the City Council:
• May 5: Study Session – Year Two (2) of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
• June 9: Public Hearing – FY 2026-27 Preliminary (Proposed) Budget and FiveYear CIP In keeping with the City’s commitment to fiscal responsibility and transparency, on May 5, 2026, a study session was held to present the City Council and the community with an overview of the proposed capital projects for the Five-Year CIP included in the period of July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2030 (Year Two (2) of the FY 2025-30 CIP).

On June 9, 2026, the Public Hearing was held to provide the City Council with an opportunity to review and provide input on the Preliminary FY 2026-27 Operating Budget, with a focus on the General Fund and Enterprise Funds, including proposed expenditures related to the organizational structure. The hearing also served as a forum for community members to provide feedback on the proposed allocation of municipal resources.

Guided by the City Council’s Strategic Priorities, the Biennial Budget functions as both a planning tool and a communication instrument, ensuring the City continues to operate efficiently while investing in programs, services, and infrastructure that promotes a vibrant, sustainable future. The following discussion outlines the key components of revenue generation and expenditure planning for FY 2026-27.

June 9th
Public Hearing
June 10 - 17
Update Budget based
on Public Hearing
June 23rd
Budget Adoption
July 1st
Fiscal Year 2026-27
begins
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 3 of 13 ends

Guiding Principles
The City Council’s strategic priorities served as the foundation for developing the FY 2026-27 General Fund Operating Budget. These priorities provided a clear roadmap for developing the revenues and expenditures for FY 2026-27:
• Fiscal and Organizational Stability: Ensure the City has the financial, staffing, and technological capacity to support core services and withstand economic fluctuations. This includes ongoing investment in cybersecurity measures to protect City systems, data, and infrastructure from evolving digital threats, ensuring continuity of operations and safeguarding sensitive information. • Economic Development and Land Use: Promote the activation of vacant and underutilized spaces, support strategic growth, and collaborate with the business community to position the City as a vibrant economic and cultural hub. • Infrastructure: Invest in safe, reliable, and well-maintained public facilities, roads, and utility systems while planning for long-term maintenance to maximize the community’s return on investment.
• Health, Wellness, and Safety: Prioritize community well-being by supporting public safety initiatives and addressing crime-related concerns. This includes the incorporation of new and innovative public safety measures that leverage technology, data, and community partnerships to enhance responsiveness, prevent crime, and improve the overall quality of life. • Community Engagement: Foster a culture of connection, collaboration, and active participation among residents and within the City organization.

Discussion:

We are now at the final step in the process of adopting the FY 2026-27 Operating and Capital Budget. This report summarizes the work completed throughout the budget development process, including presentations, discussions, and direction from the City Council, as well as the outcomes and recommendations resulting from each budget review session. Through a collaborative and transparent budget process, staff has incorporated Council feedback and refined the budget to ensure it aligns with the City’s strategic goals and long-term financial sustainability.

General Fund
The City proposes a balanced General Fund budget for FY 2026-27, as shown on the following page. Revenues of $65,053,128 for FY 2026-27, respectively, match expenditure budgets of an equal amount.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 4 of 13 ends

Table 1. General Fund Total Budget Summary
FY 2025-26

ADOPTED
FY 2026-27 CITY

COUNCIL

APPROVED
FY 2026-27

PROPOSED
Revenues $ 63,554,917 $ 64,518,443 $ 65,033,128
Expenditures $ 63,554,917 $ 64,518,443 $ 65,033,128
TOTAL SURPLUS (DEFICIT) $ - $ - $ -
Revenues
The General Fund has several revenue sources, including five (5) major categories: Sales Tax, Property Tax, Business License Tax, Utility Users’ Tax, and All Other Revenues.

Together, these five (5) categories amount to over 88% of the total General Fund revenues. The following table provides an overview of revenues by category, compared to prior-year actuals, the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget and Year-End Estimate, the FY 2026-27 City Council-Approved Budget, and the FY 2026-27 Proposed General Fund Budget.

Table 2. General Fund Revenues
Expenditures
Aligned with the City’s strategic priorities and established guiding principles, the FY 2026- 27 Budget was developed with prudent, fiscally responsible measures to maintain highquality services for the community while ensuring continued investment in critical infrastructure. The following section summarizes the proposed General Fund spending plan for FY 2026-27.

Revenue Source
FY 2024-25

ACTUALS
FY 2025-26

ADOPTED
BUDGET
FY 2025-26

AMENDED
BUDGET
FY 2025-26

YEAR-END

ESTIMATE
FY 2026-27

APPROVED
FY 2026-27

PROPOSED
VAR.

FY 2026-27
PROP
Vs.

APPROVED
Sales Tax $ 26,839,604 $ 26,944,275 $ 26,944,275 $ 26,812,079 $ 27,379,009 $ 26,804,991 $ (574,018) Property Tax 14,906,320 15,228,118 15,228,118 16,121,094 15,776,835 16,812,798 1,035,963 Business License Tax 4,657,255 4,999,443 4,999,443 4,739,931 5,095,443 5,373,443 278,000 Utility Users Tax 4,182,473 4,262,741 4,262,741 4,258,678 4,429,346 4,257,029 (172,317) Franchise Tax 970,336 1,025,570 1,025,570 961,049 1,049,530 1,049,530 - Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) 404,496 457,512 457,512 436,657 457,512 457,512 - Other Taxes* 1,078,300 1,110,100 1,110,100 1,110,100 1,149,300 1,149,300 - Licenses & Permits 2,707,273 2,441,764 2,441,764 2,492,547 2,437,286 2,482,985 45,699 Charges for Services 817,543 693,451 693,451 716,610 695,652 577,000 (118,652) All Other Revenues** 4,773,380 4,574,106 6,824,106 7,160,215 4,188,898 4,224,579 35,681 OPERATING REVENUE 61,336,980 61,737,080 63,987,080 64,808,960 62,658,811 63,189,167 530,356 Transfers In*** 6,268,624 1,817,837 5,879,275 5,811,126 1,859,632 1,843,961 (15,671) TOTAL - GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 67,605,604 $ 63,554,917 $ 69,866,355 $ 70,620,086 $ 64,518,443 $ 65,033,128 $ 514,685 *Rubbish Franchise Fee
**Includes Fines & Forfeitures, Use of Money, Other Revenue, and Intergovernmental Revenue ***Includes Transfer In (Gas Tax)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 5 of 13 ends

The General Fund has a proposed GF expenditure budget of $65,053,128 for FY 2026-

27. This amount includes $60,553,128 in operating expenditures and $4,500,000 in transfers out for FY 2026-27. These amounts fund the daily, ongoing operations of the City, including public safety (Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department contract), Community and Economic Development efforts, Parks and Recreation programs, Public Works maintenance, animal care/control, debt service, as well as various City services and functions that contribute to the day-to-day operations of the City.

The Transfer Out category includes a $4.5 million transfer to the CIP Fund, consisting of $3.0 million for the Pavement Management Program (PMP) and $1.5 million designated for the Smith Park Aquatic Center project in FY 2026–27.

Table 3 shows the percentage of expenditures for each department/function relative to the total General Fund budget, along with comparisons between the Adopted Budget for FY 2025-26 and the Approved and Proposed Budgets for FY 2026-27.

Table 3. General Fund Department Expenditures Percentage Table 4 summarizes total General Fund Expenditures by category as follows.

Table 4. General Fund Budget by Category
Administration * $ 3,846,748 $ 3,809,062 $ 4,029,408 $ 5,070,449 7.8% Public Safety 16,159,285 17,545,320 16,939,962 16,940,350 26.0% Administrative Services 2,565,489 2,363,852 2,720,927 2,527,155 3.9% Community and Economic Development 7,414,807 6,117,620 7,258,071 6,535,778 10.0% Human Resources 1,342,356 1,348,322 1,392,306 - 0.0%
Non-Departmental 8,039,648 8,257,751 8,374,775 8,124,815 12.5% Parks and Recreation 8,374,080 7,753,397 8,696,176 8,811,901 13.5% Public Works 11,747,504 11,854,406 12,106,818 12,522,680 19.3% General Fund Operating Expenditures 59,489,917 59,049,730 61,518,443 60,533,128 93% Operating Transfers Out 1,065,000 1,065,000 - - 0.0%
Capital Outlay Transfer 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 4,500,000 6.9% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 63,554,917 $ 63,114,730 $ 64,518,443 $ 65,033,128 100.0% *Includes Human Resources starting in FY 2026-27
FY 2026-27

PROPOSED
% FY 2026-27
Department/ Program PROPOSED
FY 2025-26

ADOPTED
FY 2025-26

PROJECTED
FY 2026-27

APPROVED
Salaries and Benefits $ 25,165,069 $ 26,532,951 $ 26,070,020 Maintenance and Operations 34,324,848 34,985,492 34,463,108 General Fund Operating Expenditures 59,489,917 61,518,443 60,533,128 Transfers Out 4,065,000 3,000,000 4,500,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 63,554,917 $ 64,518,443 $ 65,033,128

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
FY 2025-26

ADOPTED
FY 2026-27

APPROVED
FY 2026-27

PROPOSED
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 6 of 13 ends

Since the June 9, 2026, Public Hearing, certain adjustments to proposed revenues and expenditures have been identified and are therefore being recommended to better fund the needs of the community. The complete list of those adjustments is included in Enclosure 3.

The City has developed a balanced GF budget that aligns with our City’s financial policies and strategic goals. The revised actions itemized in Enclosure 3 result in no net change ($0 impact) on the General Fund. For the Other Funds, there is an increase of $114,532 in revenues and a decrease of $60,000 in expenditures, resulting in an overall expenditure increase of $54,532.

Table 5 shows a revised summary of the Proposed Positions by Department. The complete listing of Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department, can be found in Enclosure 1, Exhibit C.

Table 5. Staffing Summary
Enterprise Funds
The City develops budgets for four (4) Enterprise Funds: Water Authority, Pico Rivera Innovative Energy (PRIME), Golf Course, and Sports Arena. These funds operate primarily through fees and charges for services provided to customers, rather than through general tax revenues. Table 6 depicts the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenses, and ending fund balance for FY 2025-26, as well as the proposed budgets for FY 2026-27.

The Water Authority Fund revenue projections are based on previously approved water rate adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) starting on July 1, 2026.

These rate increases have been critical in funding necessary water infrastructure projects, such as the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) Water Treatment System and water main improvements that will extend into the next fiscal year.

The PRIME Fund accounts for revenues and expenditures associated with the procurement and delivery of cleaner energy to residents and businesses within the City.

As a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) program, PRIME operates in a highly Department
FY 2026-27
Approved Additions Deletions
FY 2026-27
Proposed
FY 2026-27
Reclassifications
Administration * 14.00 4.00 0.00 18.00 1.00
Administrative Services 16.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 2.00
Community and Economic Development 30.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 1.00 Human Resources** 4.00 0.00 -4.00 0.00 0.00
Parks and Recreation 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00
Public Works 70.00 4.00 -2.00 72.00 1.00
TOTAL 162.00 8.00 -6.00 164.00 5.00
*Includes City Clerk, Human Resources, Information Systems, Innov. & Comm., and Sustainability **Human Resources moved to Administration in FY 2026-27 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 7 of 13 ends

dynamic energy market, where fluctuations in wholesale energy prices, regulatory changes, and broader market conditions influence costs.

In recent years, volatility in energy markets has necessitated periodic adjustments to PRIME’s generation rates to align with market conditions and maintain the program’s financial stability. With City Council approval in April 2026, PRIME has implemented strategic rate reductions to support ongoing operations and maintenance, while also maintaining reserve levels in accordance with adopted financial policies. This approach positions the program to continue procuring energy cost-effectively and competitively over the long term.

Energy costs and program expenditures may vary year to year based on factors such as weather patterns and market pricing. Lower projected expenses in the upcoming fiscal year are primarily attributed to recent trends in energy demand, including milder seasonal conditions that reduce reliance on higher-cost energy resources. Overall, PRIME’s financial strategy emphasizes rate stability, prudent reserve management, and long-term sustainability while continuing to deliver value to the community.

The Pico Rivera Golf Course is a municipal facility operated by a third-party management company, which is responsible for day-to-day operations, including the pro shop, driving range, restaurant, and banquet services. The Golf Course Fund accounts for all revenues and expenditures related to the maintenance and operation of the course.

While the Golf Course has experienced a modest increase in rounds played, operating expenses have also risen due to higher construction costs, ground maintenance materials, service costs, and increased contract management fees. In anticipation of the upcoming Whittier Narrows Dam project, which is expected to begin in October 2026, staff has adjusted the FY 2026–27 budget to reflect reduced projected revenues and expenditures while continuing to ensure the facility is properly maintained.

The Sports Arena is a City-owned facility located on land leased from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers within the Whittier Narrows Dam area. The City, in turn, leases the facility to a third-party operator and receives revenue through quarterly lease payments.

In anticipation of the Whittier Narrows Dam project, which is expected to begin in October 2026, staff has adjusted the FY 2026–27 budget to reflect reduced expenditures and no projected revenues other than interest income. Staff will continue to monitor developments related to the project and update projections as additional information becomes available.
(This section left intentionally blank)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 8 of 13 ends

Table 6. Summary Enterprise Fund Budgets
All Other Funds
The budgets of all other funds are adequately funded by available fund balances and estimated ongoing revenues. Details and budgets for All Other Funds are attached to this report as Enclosure 1, Exhibit A5.

Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a long-term financial planning tool that identifies and prioritizes major infrastructure investments over a five-year period. It plays a key role in guiding the planning, funding, and maintenance of the City’s infrastructure assets. The CIP includes a wide range of capital projects, such as bridges and roadways, parks and open space, stormwater quality improvements, water production, treatment, and distribution systems, sanitary sewer infrastructure, City facilities, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) upgrades, and other large-scale initiatives. Table 7 summarizes the various project categories included in the CIP, with those containing unfunded amounts highlighted in green.
(This section left intentionally blank)
Water Fund PRIME Golf Course Sports Arena Total
$ 54,574,248 $ 23,835,724 $ (5,057,732) $ 951,494 $ 74,303,734 Revenues 14,822,537 28,294,610 308,950 37,500 43,463,597 Expenses 14,305,046 28,223,119 772,012 243,859 43,544,036 Operating Surplus/ (Deficit) 517,491 71,491 (463,062) (206,359) (80,439) Less: Capital Outlay 50,000 50,000
Total Surplus/ (Deficit) 467,491 71,491 (463,062) (206,359) (130,439) $ 55,041,739 $ 23,907,215 $ (5,520,794) $ 745,135 $ 74,173,295 Estimated Fund Balance 6/30/2026:

Estimated Fund Balance 6/30/2027:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 9 of 13 ends

Table 7. Year Two (2) of the Five-Year CIP Projects by Project Type and Fiscal Year Project
Type Carryover FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 Total Streets* $26,046,730 $6,009,040 $5,690,000 $6,577,692 $9,800,000 $54,123,462 Bridges $36,968,869 $3,450,100 $24,937,072 $200,000 $200,000 $65,756,041 Water $26,184,464 $900,000 $1,150,000 $400,000 $250,000 $28,884,464 Parks* $53,053,855 $2,730,000 $1,320,000 - - $57,103,855 Facilities* $5,107,534 $2,282,000 $2,130,000 - - $9,519,534 Traffic $5,238,295 $1,896,100 $50,000 - - $7,184,395
Storm Drains $545,159 - - - - $545,159
Wastewater* $1,564,991 - - - - $1,564,991
Total $154,709,897 $17,267,240 $35,277,072 $7,177,692 $10,250,000 $224,681,901 *The numbers in green contain projects that are partially or fully unfunded. Additional details are provided in Table 9.

The proposed Five-Year CIP plan (Enclosure 2) was developed using input from multiple departments, feedback gathered from the community over the years, and guidance based on City Council priorities. In developing the CIP budget, staff focused on completing existing projects while keeping facilities, parks, and streets as top priorities. The plan also incorporates recommendations from several master plans completed in recent years, including water, wastewater, storm drain, PMP, and facilities and security.

A study session was held on May 5, 2026, to provide the City Council and the community with an overview of the proposed capital projects included in the Five-Year CIP for the period of July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2030 (Year Two (2) of the FY 2025–30 CIP).

Following the study session, staff conducted a detailed review of project budgets and funding sources.

The total CIP budget for Year Two (2) of the Five-Year CIP, FY 2026-27, covering FY 2026-27 through FY 2029-30, is $224.7 million, including carryover appropriations of $154.7 million from FY 2025-26. The City’s long-term sustainability depends on maintaining both its capital infrastructure and its financial health.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 10 of 13 ends

The City's CIP funding comes from a combination of restricted and special revenue sources, as well as General Fund appropriations. Key special revenue sources used for CIP projects include Proposition C, Measure R, Measure M, SB-1, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), the American Rescue Plan Act Fund, the Water Fund, and various federal, state, and regional grants.

With the passage of Measure AB, City staff, under the direction of the City Council and with voter support, developed a financial strategy to repave streets identified in the PMP over the next five (5) years. While local return funds continue to support improvements to arterial streets, the City has committed $3 million annually toward residential street paving, resulting in a total annual investment of approximately $9 million over the fiveyear period. Measure AB also modernized and enhanced equity in the City’s business license fee structure, providing the flexibility needed to implement a sustainable funding strategy that supports long-term infrastructure improvements and better serves the community. The following table outlines the various funding sources supporting the CIP.

Table 8. FY 2026-27 through FY 2029-30 CIP Funding Sources Source Amount % of Total
Grants $107,030,953 48.1%
General Fund/CIP Fund $45,048,336 20.0%
Water $25,974,557 11.7%
Local Return $15,763,960 7.1%
SB-1 $11,826,197 5.3%
Measure W $1,607,892 0.7%
Certificate of Participation $1,303,987 0.6%
PRIME $499,539 0.2%
CDBG $390,300 0.2%
Total Funded $209,345,721 93.8%
Unfunded $15,236,180 6.2%
Total $224,681,901 100.0%
Unfunded Capital Project Needs
The City has identified $15.2 million in unfunded CIP projects for streets, parks, facilities, and wastewater CIPs. This includes $2 million for the needed improvement related to the Pico Boys Relocation. The unfunded requests will need to be addressed and incorporated into current and future budgets to ensure that the City meets its critical needs and plans effectively for the future.
(This section left intentionally blank)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 11 of 13 ends

Table 9. Unfunded CIP by Category and Fiscal Year
Project
Type Carryover FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 Total Streets - - - $577,692 $3,800,000 $4,377,692
Parks $1,825,000 $680,000 $1,320,000 - - $3,825,000
Facilities $2,280,000 $1,890,000 $2,100,000 - - $6,270,000 Wastewater $763,488 - - - - $763,488
Total $4,868,488 $2,570,000 $3,420,000 $577,692 $3,800,000 $15,236,180 Five-Year Forecast
As part of the FY 2026-27 Budget adoption process, staff has prepared a Five-Year Financial Forecast to provide the City Council with a long-term perspective on the City’s General Fund fiscal outlook. The forecast incorporates projected revenues and expenditures based on current economic conditions, historical trends, known cost drivers, and anticipated service demands. While the City continues to maintain a stable financial position, the ongoing economic uncertainty at the national, state, and local levels reinforces the importance of prudent fiscal management. The forecast serves as a planning tool to support strategic decision-making aimed at sustaining long-term financial stability and preserving essential service levels for the community.

The forecast is built on a set of key assumptions that guide projected revenue and expenditure trends over the forecast period. Revenue projections assume modest yearover-year growth in major General Fund sources, including Sales Tax, Property Tax, Business License Tax, and Utility Users Tax. Sales Tax revenues are projected to remain flat, reflecting current market conditions and recent performance trends. In contrast, Property Tax revenues are anticipated to grow moderately, driven by the dissolution of the Successor Agency and expected gains in assessed valuation from upcoming housing developments in the City.

On the expenditure side, the forecast incorporates projected increases in employee compensation, pension and benefit obligations, contractual services, and inflationary impacts across operating costs. Utility expenses and insurance premiums have also risen significantly, driven largely by an unpredictable and volatile market environment.

Collectively, these assumptions provide a conservative and reasonable basis for evaluating the City’s long-term financial outlook.

Although operating revenues are projected to keep pace with ongoing expenditures in the near term, the forecast identifies projected deficits beginning in Year Two (2), primarily due to anticipated capital outlay funding needs. The five-year forecast includes continued CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 12 of 13 ends

funding for pavement management and allocates resources in the later years to support currently unfunded CIP, consistent with the City’s long-term infrastructure priorities.

These investments are necessary to maintain critical infrastructure and ensure reliable service delivery; however, without dedicated revenue sources, they will require GF support, increasing fiscal pressure. Staff will continue to evaluate funding strategies, pursue external revenue opportunities, and phase capital investments to manage impacts on the City’s long-term financial health.

Table 10. General Fund Five-Year Forecast
Conclusion:

For FY 2026-27, the General Fund Budget is balanced, as shown in Enclosure 1. The General Fund budget is structurally balanced, with proposed revenues and expenditures totaling $65,033,128, including $4.5 million in capital outlay investments. The City’s fiscal health is sustainable only if both its capital infrastructure assets and its financial assets can be maintained over the long term. The Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget with all funds

REVENUES
Year 1
Proposed
2026-27
Year 2
Forecast
2027-28
Year 3
Forecast
2028-29
Year 4
Forecast
2029-30
Year 5
Forecast
2030-31
Sales and Use Taxes $ 26,804,991 $ 27,341,091 $ 27,887,913 $ 28,445,671 $ 29,014,584 Property Taxes 16,618,793 17,928,475 18,824,899 19,766,144 20,754,451 Business License 5,393,443 5,609,181 5,777,456 5,950,780 6,129,303 Utility User Tax (UUT) 4,257,029 4,184,874 4,224,880 4,299,106 4,342,097 Franchise Tax (Fee) & Rubbish 2,198,830 2,275,290 2,343,549 2,413,855 2,486,271 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) 457,512 457,512 471,237 485,374 499,936 Property Transfer Tax 194,005 203,705 213,891 224,585 235,814 Licenses and Permits 2,482,985 2,582,304 2,659,774 2,739,567 2,821,754 Charges for Services 577,000 618,830 1,402,186 1,450,507 1,500,728 Fines and Forfeitures 1,355,000 1,409,200 1,451,476 1,495,020 1,539,871 Other Revenues 617,002 641,682 660,933 680,761 701,183
Use of Money and Property 2,057,577 2,136,236 2,228,228 2,324,197 2,424,318 Intergovernmental 195,000 194,424 196,490 196,863 195,694 Operating Revenue Total: 63,209,167 65,582,805 68,342,910 70,472,430 72,646,004 Transfer In 1,843,961 1,807,082 1,770,940 1,735,521 1,700,811 Revenue Total: 65,053,128 67,389,887 70,113,851 72,207,951 74,346,815

EXPENDITURES
Year 1
Proposed
2026-27
Year 2
Forecast
2027-28
Year 3
Forecast
2028-29
Year 4
Forecast
2029-30
Year 5
Forecast
2030-31
Salaries and Wages 15,680,569 17,131,490 19,114,115 20,400,838 21,800,298 Benefits 10,461,451 11,552,604 12,391,496 13,211,199 14,112,374 Supplies, Services, and Equipment 28,008,288 29,178,586 30,193,275 30,612,998 31,690,944 Training, Memberships, and Conferences 424,484 437,982 448,510 459,354 470,523 Maintenance and Repairs 1,296,051 1,947,893 2,018,330 2,091,480 2,167,454 Other Maintenance and Operations 4,682,285 5,181,761 5,812,630 6,607,403 7,665,810 Operating Expenditure Total: 60,553,128 65,430,316 69,978,355 73,383,271 77,907,403 Operating Surplus (Deficit): 2,656,039 152,489 (1,635,444) (2,910,841) (5,261,399) Capital Transfer - PMP Project: 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 Capital Transfer - Unfunded CIP: $ 1,500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 General Fund Surplus (Deficit): $ - $ (2,040,429) $ (3,864,504) $ (5,175,320) $ (7,560,588) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING BUDGET AND YEAR TWO (2)

OF THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Page 13 of 13 ends

combined includes $146,611,985 in total revenues and $140,248,322 in total expenditures for FY 2026-27.

The FY 2026-27 Budget was constructed to ensure financial sustainability to strategically position the City to continue prioritizing essential services, infrastructure improvements, and long-term fiscal health while supporting the City’s vision of a sustainable, equitable, and vibrant community.

Maintaining progress toward structural balance through continued fiscal discipline remains critical, particularly given the capital investment needs anticipated in the coming years. Staff will closely monitor all revenue sources and expenditure trends and actively assess opportunities to increase revenues and reduce costs where feasible.

Steve Carmona
SC:AG:JG:DS:JA:ep
Enclosures: 1) Resolution approving and adopting the FY 2026-27 Budget and Capital Improvement Projects (Exhibits A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, B, C, and D)
2) Resolution adopting General Fund and Proprietary Fund reserve policies (Exhibits A and B)
3) Summary of Proposed Changes
RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO

RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN OPERATING AND CAPITAL
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and considered the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27, presented through staff reports, Study Sessions, and public testimony; and information received in a noticed regular meeting on the City budget; and WHEREAS, the original of said Proposed Budget will be revised so as to reflect each and all of the amendments, changes, and modifications which the City Council, up to the time of adoption of this resolution, including any actions taken at the June 23, 2026 meeting, believes should be made in said Proposed Budget as so submitted and to correct any non-substantive errors discovered.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera as follows:

SECTION 1. That the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27, a complete copy of which has been provided to the City Council and made available to the public and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, and which is summarized in Exhibits A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5, attached hereto, is hereby approved and adopted.

SECTION 2. That the Estimated Revenue and Transfers In for all funds for Fiscal Year 2026-27, a summary of which is attached as “Exhibit A1,” and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, is hereby approved and adopted. When combined with reserves, the Estimated Revenue and Transfers In for Fiscal Year 2026- 27 are sufficient to fund the appropriations set forth in the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27.

SECTION 3. That the Proposed Appropriations and Transfers Out for all funds for Fiscal Year 2026-27, a summary of which is attached as “Exhibit A1,” and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, providing appropriations summaries of details currently contained in the City’s accounting system, including technical adjustments related to Transfers In and Transfers Out, and detail of estimated revenue, is approved and adopted.

SECTION 4. That the several Tables of Organization and Master Position Control, copies of which are attached hereto as “Exhibit B” and “Exhibit C,” respectively, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, are hereby approved and adopted. The City Manager, subject to compliance with all applicable Municipal Code and Personnel Rules and Regulations, may revise the Tables of Organization and Master Position Control provided that the authorized total number of full-time, regular personnel citywide does not exceed the total number of authorized positions on the Master Position Control (“Exhibit C”).

Enclosure 1
4a
RESOLUTION NO. ____

Page 2 of 3 ends

SECTION 5. That the Salary Schedules/Tables for all authorized full-time positions are updated and approved to reflect the salary provisions in effect per all approved Memorandum of Understanding between the City and all recognized bargaining groups.

SECTION 6. That from the effective date of the budget, the several amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures shall be and become appropriated to the several departments for the respective objects and purposes therein named; provided, however, that:

SECTION 6.1. Department Directors are hereby authorized to move appropriations from one object to another, within each budgetary program/division and within the same fund, provided that total approved appropriations for a budget program and within the same fund are not exceeded; and,
SECTION 6.2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer operating budget appropriations within the same fund between departments, divisions, programs, and/or object codes, provided total appropriations for a Department by fund are not increased.

SECTION 7. That changes to total Department appropriations, total fund appropriations, all other changes to Capital Improvement Program appropriations not specified in Section 6 et al of this Resolution, changes to the number of full-time, regular positions by classification, transfers to and/or from appropriated reserves, cancellation of appropriations, and appropriations of fund balances shall require the majority approval of the City Council.

SECTION 8. That the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) contained in the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27 (“Exhibit D”) is hereby approved in concept, and the Director of Public Works or his/her designee is authorized to publicly advertise for bids on these projects in accordance with State of California statutes and City of Pico Rivera Municipal Code.

SECTION 9. That construction of Capital Improvement Projects requires the use of professional services such as engineering oversight, geotechnical services, water testing, project management, design, surveying, and other required studies and activities.

Funding for these professional services is included within each Capital Improvement Project’s budget as set forth in the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27, and specifically the five-year Proposed Capital Improvement Program budget as presented in “Exhibit D.” Consistent with the State of California statutes and City of Pico Rivera Municipal Code sections covering procurement of professional services, the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to enter into any necessary professional services agreements to facilitate the completion of an approved Capital Improvement Project.

RESOLUTION NO. ____

Page 3 of 3 ends

SECTION 10. That all encumbrances remaining as of June 30, 2026, after thorough review by appropriate Administrative Services Department staff, will either be released or re-appropriated for use in Fiscal Year 2026-27, as appropriate, in the respective funds, departments, programs, and accounts/objects, thus adjusting the adopted budget by the encumbered amount carried over without further City Council action required.

SECTION 11. That all active Capital Improvement Program appropriation balances that existed as of June 30, 2026, will be re-appropriated for use in Fiscal Year 2026-27, as appropriate, without further City Council action required.

SECTION 12. The City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this resolution, and it shall thereupon be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AND PASSED this 23rd day of June 2026.

_______________________________
Gustavo V. Camacho, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ _______________________________ Cynthia Ayala, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney AYES:

NOES:

Expenditures Revenue Surplus / (Deficit)
General Fund * $ 66,698,147 $ 66,274,171 $ (423,976)
Internal Service Fund $ 494,100 $ 796,284 $ 302,184
Special Revenue Funds $ 19,848,472 $ 20,031,117 $ 182,645 Grant Funds** $ 7,216,282 $ 7,961,671 $ 745,389
Capital Project Funds*** $ - $ 5,671,100 $ 5,671,100
Enterprise Funds $ 43,594,036 $ 43,463,597 $ (130,439)
Assessment District Funds $ 2,397,285 $ 2,414,045 $ 16,760 TOTAL CITY BUDGET $ 140,248,322 $ 146,611,985 $ 6,363,664 * Includes funds supported by the General Fund. See page 9 for funds included. **Grant Reimbursement Funds
***Sufficient fund balances available for expenditures in FY 2026-27 City of Pico Rivera
Citywide (All Funds) Summary
FY 2026-27 Proposed Budget (Expenditures and Revenue)
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A1
Starting Fund Estimated Estimated Estimated Operating Transfers In TOTAL Operating Capital Transfers TOTAL Estimated Balance
Revenue &
Transfers-In
Expenditures &
Transfers-Out Fund Balance Revenues REVENUES Expenditures Projects Out EXPENDITURES Fund Balance July 1, 2025 FY 25-26 FY 25-26 July 1, 2026 June 30, 2027 General Fund
100 General Fund - Operating 69,065,373 70,620,086 70,620,086 69,065,373 63,189,167 1,843,961 65,033,128 60,533,128 - 4,500,000 65,033,128 69,065,373 105 Liability Claims (428,020) 2,297,397 1,523,426 345,951 362,049 - 362,049 708,000 - - 708,000 0 106 Workers Compensation Claims 54,732 172,500 292,226 (64,994) 501,994 - 501,994 437,000 - - 437,000 0 180 Strategic Goals-CED 1,233,128 - 19,128 1,213,999 - - - 520,019 - - 520,019 693,980 181 Community Benefit Fund 210,000 417,000 627,000 - - - - - - - - - 182 ICE Legal Aid Fund 25,000 25,000 37,350 12,650 - - - - - - - 12,650 551 Water Enterprise 13,992,407 - - 13,992,407 - - - - - - - 13,992,407 875 Section 115 PRSP-Trust 2,245,835 233,769 13,602 2,466,002 377,000 - 377,000 - - - - 2,843,002 Sub Total 86,398,454 73,765,752 73,132,818 87,031,388 64,430,210 1,843,961 66,274,171 62,198,147 - 4,500,000 66,698,147 86,607,412 Equipment Replacement Fund
170 Equipment Replacement 2,758,925 951,576 438,250 3,272,251 796,284 - 796,284 494,100 - - 494,100 3,574,436 Sub Total 2,758,925 951,576 438,250 3,272,251 796,284 - 796,284 494,100 - - 494,100 3,574,436 Special Revenue Funds
200 Air Quality Improvement 334,308 98,475 352,462 80,321 95,394 - 95,394 34,600 - - 34,600 141,115 201 State Gas Tax - 1,719,344 1,719,344 - 1,768,961 - 1,768,961 - - 1,768,961 1,768,961 - 202 SB1 - Traffic Congestion Relief 4,654,380 1,940,082 4,563,241 2,031,221 1,961,832 - 1,961,832 340,576 1,500,000 - 1,840,576 2,152,477 205 Proposition A 4,439,154 1,829,432 4,512,509 1,756,076 1,672,948 - 1,672,948 2,162,827 - - 2,162,827 1,266,197 206 Proposition C 1,665,630 1,475,756 438,337 2,703,049 1,426,689 - 1,426,689 100,000 1,318,821 - 1,418,821 2,710,917 207 Measure R 2,711,155 1,824,866 615,071 3,920,950 1,149,017 - 1,149,017 155,015 820,000 - 975,015 4,094,952 208 Measure M 625,809 1,330,818 1,047,204 909,423 1,165,806 - 1,165,806 90,000 364,390 833,919 1,288,309 786,920 209 Measure W 1,101,153 957,610 589,715 1,469,048 972,766 - 972,766 355,588 550,000 - 905,588 1,536,226 210 Transportation Development Act (72,552) 141,649 143,070 (73,973) 80,000 - 80,000 - 80,000 - 80,000 (73,973) 215 Measure A - - - - - - - - - - - -
220 Public Image Enhancement (PIE) 1,705,298 92,245 1,141,727 655,817 47,900 - 47,900 - - - - 703,717 221 California Beverage Container 69,134 70,920 24,251 115,803 19,568 - 19,568 70,000 - - 70,000 65,371 225 Sewer Maintenance 0 3 - 3 - - - - - - - 3
250 Cable/PEG Support 358,307 48,589 505,503 (98,607) 50,000 - 50,000 17,945 - - 17,945 (66,552) 255 Economic Development Sustainability 883,252 76,185 51,306 908,131 35,700 - 35,700 - - - - 943,831 263 Passons Grade Separation - - - - - - - - - - - -
270 Park Development 555,557 1,000,674 705,550 850,680 37,500 - 37,500 - - - - 888,180 280 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (55,327) 508,008 566,956 (114,275) 598,522 - 598,522 209,482 389,040 - 598,522 (114,275) 282 Home Program 3,117,455 408,379 - 3,525,835 108,600 - 108,600 - - - - 3,634,435 283 CalHome 705,599 - - 705,599 - - - - - - - 705,599
290 L&M Income Housing Asset 1,448,492 67,474 - 1,515,966 58,900 - 58,900 - - - - 1,574,866 291 Housing Assistance Program (Section 8) 914,273 7,636,416 7,537,138 1,013,551 7,804,046 - 7,804,046 7,805,959 - - 7,805,959 1,011,638 305 2018 Series A Certificates of Participation 1,398,999 895,265 2,288,169 6,095 73,000 833,919 906,919 833,919 - - 833,919 79,095 450 Financial System - 392,844 29,314 363,530 70,049 - 70,049 47,430 - - 47,430 386,149 640 American Recovery Plan (0) 2,593,439 2,593,439 (0) - - - - - - - (0) Sub Total 26,560,078 25,108,472 29,424,306 22,244,243 19,197,198 833,919 20,031,117 12,223,341 5,022,251 2,602,880 19,848,472 22,426,887 City of Pico Rivera
Revenue and Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
Summary of Resources and Requirements
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A2
Starting Fund Estimated Estimated Estimated Operating Transfers In TOTAL Operating Capital Transfers TOTAL Estimated Balance
Revenue &
Transfers-In
Expenditures &
Transfers-Out Fund Balance Revenues REVENUES Expenditures Projects Out EXPENDITURES Fund Balance July 1, 2025 FY 25-26 FY 25-26 July 1, 2026 June 30, 2027 City of Pico Rivera
Revenue and Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
Summary of Resources and Requirements
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget
Grant Funds
637 Gateway Cities Council of Governments (COG) 17,334 - - 17,334 - - - - - - - 17,334 638 Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL) Federal - - - - - - - - - - - - 661 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) (191,655) 449,754 258,099 - 600,000 - 600,000 - 600,000 - 600,000 - 670 Used Oil Recycle 75,090 3,632 8,634 70,088 11,412 - 11,412 8,412 - - 8,412 73,088 671 Cal Recycle 710,088 573,961 296,644 987,406 582,778 - 582,778 538,172 - - 538,172 1,032,012 690 Recreation & Education Accelerating Children's Hopes (REACH) 978,700 980,584 1,342,319 616,965 1,093,492 - 1,093,492 1,311,391 - 75,000 1,386,391 324,066 697 Miscellaneous Local Grants (8,688) 372,292 426,103 (62,500) 59,000 - 59,000 59,000 - - 59,000 (62,500) 698 Miscellaneous Federal Grants 33,578 118,862 207,609 (55,169) 3,666,269 - 3,666,269 - 3,666,269 - 3,666,269 (55,169) 699 Miscellaneous State Grants (2,050,453) 2,677,816 2,415,637 (1,788,275) 1,948,720 - 1,948,720 669,318 288,720 - 958,038 (797,593) Sub Total (436,006) 5,176,901 4,955,045 (214,151) 7,961,671 - 7,961,671 2,586,293 4,554,989 75,000 7,216,282 531,238 Capital Projects Fund
400 Capital Improvement 21,632,580 9,761,329 8,814,459 22,579,450 1,171,100 4,500,000 5,671,100 - - - - 28,250,550 Sub Total 21,632,580 9,761,329 8,814,459 22,579,450 1,171,100 4,500,000 5,671,100 - - - - 28,250,550 Assessment District Funds
230 Lighting Assessment District 4,129,905 2,679,999 6,046,389 763,515 2,397,285 - 2,397,285 2,397,285 - - 2,397,285 763,515 231 Paramount/Mines Assessment District 103,580 17,439 - 121,019 16,760 - 16,760 - - - - 137,779 Sub Total 4,233,485 2,697,438 6,046,389 884,535 2,414,045 - 2,414,045 2,397,285 - - 2,397,285 901,295 Enterprise Funds
550 Water Authority 53,786,710 17,219,397 16,431,859 54,574,248 14,822,537 - 14,822,537 14,305,046 50,000 - 14,355,046 55,041,739 560 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) 21,962,477 28,548,576 26,675,330 23,835,724 28,294,610 - 28,294,610 28,223,119 - - 28,223,119 23,907,215 561 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Power Choice 93 42,659 34,145 8,608 - - - - - - - 8,608 570 Golf Course (4,656,571) 1,363,893 1,765,054 (5,057,732) 308,950 - 308,950 772,012 - - 772,012 (5,520,794) 590 Recreation Area Complex 873,557 316,468 238,531 951,494 37,500 - 37,500 243,859 - - 243,859 745,135 Sub Total 71,966,267 47,490,993 45,144,918 74,312,341 43,463,597 - 43,463,597 43,544,036 50,000 - 43,594,036 74,181,903 Successor Agency
851 Successor - DS FUND (91,252,623) 94,559,590 3,306,967 - - - - - - - - - 852 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund 2,979,879 - 2,979,879 - - - - - - - - - Sub Total (88,272,744) 94,559,590 6,286,847 - - - - - - - - - -
GRAND TOTAL 124,841,038 259,512,051 174,243,031 210,110,058 $ 139,434,105 $ 7,177,880 $ 146,611,985 $ 123,443,202 $ 9,627,240 $ 7,177,880 $ 140,248,322 $ 216,473,720

DESCRIPTION
FY 2022-23

ACTUALS
FY 2023-24

ACTUALS
FY 2024-25

ACTUALS
FY 2025-26

ADOPTED
FY 2025-26

YEAR-END

ESTIMATES
FY 2026-27

CITY COUNCIL

APPROVED
FY 2026-27

PROPOSED
Taxes and Franchises
40100 SALES AND USE TAXES 12,577,282 13,533,367 13,932,771 13,733,107 13,894,530 14,033,689 14,019,321 40101 SALES AND USE TAXES - MEASURE P 12,539,697 12,715,292 12,987,071 13,254,498 12,961,805 13,388,650 12,829,000 40102 SALES TAX REVENUE CONTRA ACCOUNT - (112,592) (80,238) (43,330) (44,256) (43,330) (43,330) 40200 FRANCHISE TAX 1,077,004 1,048,670 970,336 1,025,570 961,049 1,049,530 1,049,530 40400 PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX 220,945 110,238 129,841 194,005 152,790 194,005 194,005 40500 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 597,129 522,694 404,496 457,512 436,657 457,512 457,512 40700 UTILITY USERS TAX 4,001,578 3,881,820 4,182,473 4,262,741 4,258,678 4,429,346 4,257,029 40800 RUBBISH FRANCHISE FEE 986,400 1,035,700 1,078,300 1,110,100 1,110,100 1,149,300 1,149,300 44200 PROPERTY TAX-IN LIEU OF VLF 9,521,166 10,023,410 10,492,654 10,754,346 10,884,847 11,135,050 11,260,264 45400 PROPERTY TAX-A.B. 1197 ALLOCATION 4,048,127 4,029,440 4,283,825 4,279,767 4,668,928 4,447,780 5,358,529 45450 PROPERTY TAX PASS THROUGH - - - - 414,529 - -
Subtotal - Taxes and Franchises 45,569,330 46,788,038 48,381,529 49,028,316 49,699,658 50,241,532 50,531,160 Licenses and Permits
41000 CERT. OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS 24,073 29,799 32,755 22,709 27,222 23,231 25,000 41100 BUSINESS LICENSE TAX 2,928,992 4,427,002 4,334,701 4,788,000 4,573,089 4,884,000 5,182,000 41101 BUSINESS LICENSE TAX - DELINQUENT - 189 877 850 540 850 850 41102 BUSINESS LICENSE - LEGAL MATTERS - - - - - - (20,000) 41105 BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING FEE 295,212 (96,523) 33,171 100,717 80,302 100,717 100,717 41106 DISCOVERED BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING - (308,262) (195,473) (94,569) (472,773) (94,569) (94,569) 41110 BUSINESS LICENSE LATE FEE 45,796 418,926 474,045 204,249 549,982 204,249 204,249 41111 BUSINESS LICENSE DELINQUENT FEE 15 733 9,934 196 8,791 196 196 41115 SB1186 FEE 9,475 10,403 10,065 9,116 10,554 9,116 9,116 41120 HOME OCCUPATION - PLANNING REVIEW 143 - - 1,000 - 1,000 1,000 41130 TOBACCO RETAILER LICENSE - 8,840 2,694 20,800 12,531 20,800 20,800 41200 REGULATORY PERMIT 12,268 9,840 11,139 9,180 9,662 9,180 9,180 41300 BUILDING PERMITS 888,949 618,861 1,019,454 750,000 1,133,278 750,000 1,250,000 41305 GREEN FEE - SB 1473 431 - - - - - -
41315 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE 58,991 5,540 77,068 13,000 105,166 13,000 40,000 41350 AUTOMATED PERMIT SYSTEM 4,202 5,039 17,874 4,000 37,932 4,000 30,000 41400 PLUMBING PERMITS 79,027 86,053 97,419 95,000 14,134 90,000 70,000 41500 ELECTRICAL PERMITS 122,556 151,339 268,545 190,000 359,666 190,000 50,000 41600 STRONG MOTION IMPL PROGRAM (SMIP) 1,907 - - - - - - 41700 HEATING AIR COND PERMIT 54,579 46,493 56,759 50,000 58,153 50,000 50,000 41800 DOG LICENSE 180,683 180,782 164,254 180,000 169,288 180,000 180,000 41900 OTHER LICENSE & PERMITS 177,722 148,207 97,114 150,000 78,675 150,000 100,000 42000 PLAN CHECK FEES 650,469 493,809 454,260 650,000 61,162 650,000 300,000 42300 STORM DRAIN REVENUE 134,352 123,224 149,927 116,204 126,152 116,204 116,204 46100 ZONING AND PLANNING FEES 167,193 206,004 241,073 175,000 281,516 175,000 225,000 46350 RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT 8,537 7,252 6,802 5,755 7,346 5,755 6,685 Subtotal - Licenses and Permits 5,845,572 6,573,550 7,364,456 7,441,207 7,232,367 7,532,729 7,856,428 City of Pico Rivera
Fiscal Years 2022-23 through 2026-27
Historical Actuals and Proposed Budget
General Fund Revenue Detail
OBJECT
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A3

DESCRIPTION
FY 2022-23

ACTUALS
FY 2023-24

ACTUALS
FY 2024-25

ACTUALS
FY 2025-26

ADOPTED
FY 2025-26

YEAR-END

ESTIMATES
FY 2026-27

CITY COUNCIL

APPROVED
FY 2026-27

PROPOSED
City of Pico Rivera
Fiscal Years 2022-23 through 2026-27
Historical Actuals and Proposed Budget
General Fund Revenue Detail
OBJECT
Fines and Forfeitures
42050 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION 82,893 100,695 62,073 85,000 43,000 85,000 50,000 42100 VEHICLE CODE FINES 72,368 44,217 73,767 75,000 202,598 93,000 75,000 42200 OTHER COURT FINES 1,016,504 1,068,996 1,020,589 1,200,000 1,074,923 1,200,000 1,200,000 42250 FINES & VIOLATION- FIREWORKS - 53 13,650 9,100 29,650 4,550 30,000 Subtotal - Fines and Forfeitures 1,171,765 1,213,961 1,170,079 1,369,100 1,350,171 1,382,550 1,355,000 Use of Money and Property
43100 INTEREST INCOME 1,085,107 2,476,966 2,379,071 1,938,900 2,474,358 1,842,300 2,038,786 43116 INVESTMENT FAIR VALUE GAIN (LOSS) (216,844) 860,095 432,319 63,200 (185,193) 60,100 - 43200 RENTS AND CONCESSIONS 3,772 23,111 7,711 9,273 12 9,273 9,273 48820 RENTALS 5 370 7,000 - - - -
Subtotal - Use of Money and Property 872,040 3,360,542 2,826,100 2,011,373 2,289,177 1,911,673 2,048,059 Charges for Services
42010 RECORD RETENTION SURCHARGE 3,323 3,380 3,775 3,435 2,744 3,435 3,000 42020 EV CHARGING USER FEES - - 68,812 - - - -
46504 PARKS AND REC - SPECIAL EVENTS 55,086 33,953 44,226 35,000 57,558 35,000 35,000 46508 PARKS AND REC - YOUTH SPORTS 39,360 54,045 58,490 65,000 64,337 65,000 55,000 46509 PARKS AND REC - ADULT SPORTS 32,804 37,149 25,375 30,000 25,838 30,000 20,000 46510 PARKS AND REC - CONTRACT PROGRAMS 119,286 141,182 163,645 125,000 178,059 125,000 125,000 46511 PARKS AND REC - FEES & PROGRAMS 432 2,374 2,355 2,000 2,366 2,000 2,000 46512 PARKS AND REC - FIELD & FACILITY RENTALS 109,583 114,900 78,163 120,000 87,174 120,000 90,000 46513 PARKS AND REC - BATTING CAGES 950 700 2,628 850 4,389 850 2,500 46514 PARKS AND REC - TEEN SERVICES - - 195 200 - 200 200 46520 PARKS AND REC - GO GETTERS PROGRAM 7,980 6,470 5,880 2,500 5,964 2,500 5,000 46601 PARKS AND REC - TRIPS & TOURS 11,267 33,925 40,882 50,000 31,151 50,000 30,000 46602 PARKS AND REC - SENIOR CENTER 13,911 22,379 27,837 25,000 37,488 25,000 25,000 46603 PARKS AND REC - BUSINESS-FAMILY ENGAGE 3,387 7,030 7,465 2,500 8,190 2,500 3,000 46605 PARKS AND REC - COMMUNITY GARDEN 3,530 7,700 4,715 1,000 4,966 1,000 1,000 46607 PARKS AND REC - CAMPS 92,516 116,492 138,745 135,000 134,247 135,000 130,000 46900 REPRODUCTION CHARGES 232 219 265 266 329 266 300
48670 VENDING MACHINE COMMISSION 0 - - - - - -
48830 CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE - (1,200) - - - - -
48835 TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE 66,843 59,260 97,577 68,474 15,104 70,049 - 48836 TRAINING SURCHARGE 20,512 14,499 22,095 13,253 28,734 13,558 25,000 48840 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 14,678 17,517 24,419 13,973 27,972 14,294 25,000 Subtotal - Charges for Services 595,679 671,973 817,543 693,451 716,610 695,652 577,000

DESCRIPTION
FY 2022-23

ACTUALS
FY 2023-24

ACTUALS
FY 2024-25

ACTUALS
FY 2025-26

ADOPTED
FY 2025-26

YEAR-END

ESTIMATES
FY 2026-27

CITY COUNCIL

APPROVED
FY 2026-27

PROPOSED
City of Pico Rivera
Fiscal Years 2022-23 through 2026-27
Historical Actuals and Proposed Budget
General Fund Revenue Detail
OBJECT
Other Revenue
42302 FORECLOSURE PRGM-REGISTRATION 28,320 19,740 15,980 - 19,839 - 20,000 42304 LEGAL SETTLEMENTS 810,503 - - - - - -
43210 LEASE REVENUE 17,991 - - 9,518 - 9,518 9,518
46000 IMPOUND SERVICE CHARGE 46,070 43,056 42,228 41,305 124,097 41,305 100,000 46300 PARKING PERMIT 286 - 72 - 110 - -
46310 INOPERATIVE VEHICLE EXTENSION 279 - 60 151 91 151 150 47100 SALES OF PROPERTY 928,625 - - - - - -
47130 SALE OF FULLY DEPRECIATED ASSETS - - 26,100 - 6,810 - - 47200 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 234,761 214,671 293,640 230,580 2,500,462 230,580 230,580 47220 DONATION & SPONSORSHIP 13,600 258,600 10,100 - 20,100 - - 47310 RESTITUTION 2,284 - 30 - - - -
47500 ST MANDATED COSTS/REIMB 122,276 57,351 56,922 - 58,630 - - 47610 COST REIMBURSEMENTS 309,887 57,376 8,143 61,860 9,075 63,283 63,283 47612 COST RECOVERY-ROAD IMPACTS (RUBBISH VEHICLES) 19,700 20,700 21,600 22,200 22,200 10,000 10,000 47620 COOP PURCHASING PROGRAM FCCC - - 598 149 2,989 152 152 47630 COST REIMBURSEMENTS-NON CIP DEPOSITS - - - 27,217 5,198 27,761 27,761 47850 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CHARGES - - - - 444,230 - 148,076 47920 RECYCLING PROGRAM REVENUE 3,962 4,211 1,060 2,000 169 2,000 2,000 48970 CBC REBATE PROGRAM 30,299 23,016 16,077 23,849 12,741 24,326 15,000 48975 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES- LEASE - 102,880 - - - - - Subtotal - Other Revenue 2,568,843 801,601 492,610 418,829 3,226,740 409,076 626,520 Intergovernmental Revenue
44800 FEDERAL GRANTS 1 - - - - - -
45000 STATE GRANTS 37,000 78,500 90,000 579,804 92,700 290,599 - 45500 C.O.P.S. PRGM ALLOCATION 165,271 186,159 194,663 195,000 201,537 195,000 195,000 45800 BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASST GRANT 49,431 - - - - -
Subtotal - Intergovernmental Revenue 251,703 264,659 284,663 774,804 294,237 485,599 195,000 TOTAL - OPERATING REVENUE 56,874,931 59,674,323 61,336,980 61,737,080 64,808,960 62,658,811 63,189,167 47900 Non-Operating Transfers In 1,847,348 1,719,327 6,268,624 1,817,837 5,811,126 1,859,632 1,843,961 TOTAL - GENERAL FUND REVENUE 58,722,279 61,393,650 67,605,604 63,554,917 70,620,086 64,518,443 65,033,128

OBJECT DESCRIPTION
FY 2022-23

ACTUALS
FY 2023-24

ACTUALS
FY 2024-25

ACTUALS
FY 2025-26

ADOPTED
FY 2025-26

YEAR-END

ESTIMATES
FY 2026-27

APPROVED
FY 2026-27

PROPOSED
51100 - SALARIES 9,447,769 10,053,680 10,687,834 12,438,717 11,540,893 12,982,199 12,589,540 51120 - VACATION/SICK LEAVE ACCT 555,509 510,757 474,691 377,901 498,333 397,308 397,308 51200 - HOURLY SALARIES 1,327,746 2,005,821 2,044,707 2,826,709 2,136,424 2,974,739 2,961,421 51300 - OVERTIME 144,834 170,465 225,853 140,700 380,991 140,700 132,300 51500 - PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT 3,402,558 3,438,393 3,720,606 4,326,525 4,145,965 4,591,277 4,470,529 51501 - PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT 50,212 69,406 75,077 112,798 104,129 118,348 111,761 51504 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION 64,377 117,651 82,793 134,540 131,502 140,327 135,792 51505 - PT RETIREMENT - - 569 - - - -
51600 - WORKER'S COMPENSATION INS 84,367 102,438 135,385 156,080 153,404 180,343 181,720 51700 - DISABILITY INSURANCE 84,034 88,999 99,409 123,337 122,613 129,978 124,016 51800 - UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 3,507 7,594 7,217 - 15,500 - - 51900 - GROUP HEALTH & LIFE INS 2,564,115 2,783,073 3,099,379 3,908,421 3,337,145 4,320,041 4,328,047 51901 - CASH BACK INCENTIVE PAY 267,317 252,481 232,026 230,562 230,374 230,562 266,166 51903 - AUTO ALLOWANCE 53,043 62,903 57,729 58,680 59,150 65,473 58,920 51904 - TECHNOLOGY STIPEND 16,034 17,942 16,189 16,530 16,732 18,665 16,890 51905 - BILINGUAL PAY 24,723 19,183 20,974 21,810 21,458 24,100 22,934 51906 - POST EMPLOYMENT HEALTH PLAN 11,331 11,168 10,871 15,955 16,053 17,898 19,949 51907 - OPEB COST ALLOCATION 435,239 399,998 568,407 495,442 495,448 412,753 467,632 51908 - CERTIFICATION COMPENSATION - 4,338 2,676 - 3,486 - 3,375 51930 - MEDICARE/EMPLOYER PORTION 180,818 187,849 196,369 180,362 206,230 188,240 181,720 51951 - PARS PSP TRUST - - 621,302 - - - -
51960 - VACANCY SAVINGS (400,000) (400,000) - (400,000) - (400,000) (400,000) 51961 - VACANCY SAVINGS OFFSET 400,000 400,000 - - - - - 51962 - PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS - - - - 565 - -
Subtotal - Salaries and Benefits 18,717,533 20,304,138 22,380,063 25,165,069 23,616,395 26,532,951 26,070,020 52100 - POSTAGE 58,741 37,046 66,430 94,349 84,369 94,349 81,349 52200 - DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 229,088 197,514 253,392 268,108 304,287 297,040 318,840 52205 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 26,685 157,477 19,780 49,701 46,085 49,701 46,101 52210 - SUPPLIES/CHEMICALS 12,266 3,442 - 1,000 889 1,000 1,000 52230 - SB 1186B ADA EXPENSES - 500 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 52250 - UNIFORMS 45,211 54,587 48,305 69,330 84,330 70,593 68,093 52255 - PARTICIPANT UNIFORMS 30,893 30,783 39,688 40,663 40,663 40,663 40,663 52300 - ADVERTISING AND PUBLICATIONS 77,462 51,981 56,536 52,155 64,465 52,155 56,330 52400 - PRINT, DUPLICATE & PHOTO 145,592 166,241 142,141 290,454 202,221 291,454 299,775 52500 - ELECTION EXPENSE 117,591 - 118,162 - - 150,000 150,000 52600 - MEMBERSHIP AND DUES 93,109 97,456 104,862 117,036 95,206 117,336 119,586 52700 - BOOKS AND PERIODICALS 1,107 2,153 1,449 3,450 3,424 3,450 3,450 52800 - SOFTWARE 70,635 2,049 2,028 661 661 661 661
52805 - SOFTWARE LICENSE 311,318 487,809 535,424 678,056 669,279 761,257 701,456 52900 - COMMISSION STIPENDS 5,100 9,075 7,150 14,250 10,500 14,095 14,095 53100 - AUTOMOBILE SUPPLIES 51,857 74,232 70,644 55,000 70,295 55,000 55,000 53150 - FUEL 195,171 199,057 180,555 200,250 200,250 200,250 200,250 53200 - MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 641 408 196 1,900 1,951 1,900 2,050 53300 - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 38,488 32,419 44,315 174,560 66,443 174,560 178,685 53301 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL 106,562 158,483 159,038 219,400 168,727 242,910 169,400 53400 - BUILDING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 183,068 204,060 233,918 220,497 239,932 221,420 221,420 53410 - ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE 33,351 26,935 38,970 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 53430 - PAINT SUPPLIES 4,458 11,987 6,332 7,704 12,704 7,704 7,704 53440 - PLUMBING SUPPLIES 25,636 22,798 18,300 36,000 66,000 36,000 37,000 53450 - SWIMMING POOL MAINTENANCE - - - 1,000 1,000 1,000 - 53500 - SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 150,266 191,134 338,869 175,215 403,088 175,578 185,578 53610 - COST REIMBURSEMENTS - - - 150 150 150 150
53800 - C.O.P.S. PGRM COSTS 165,271 186,159 194,663 - - - - 54100 - SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES 354,835 410,327 508,163 378,194 753,612 166,681 165,638 54200 - UTILITIES 1,209,583 1,252,309 1,339,492 1,128,140 1,349,601 1,128,140 1,409,792 54300 - TELEPHONE 221,881 126,880 157,487 154,013 144,571 159,252 143,961 54400 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 451,428 473,031 693,553 1,801,113 1,258,289 1,356,464 958,087 City of Pico Rivera
General Fund Expenditure Detail
Historical Actuals and Proposed Budget
Fiscal Years 2022-23 through 2026-27
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A4

OBJECT DESCRIPTION
FY 2022-23

ACTUALS
FY 2023-24

ACTUALS
FY 2024-25

ACTUALS
FY 2025-26

ADOPTED
FY 2025-26

YEAR-END

ESTIMATES
FY 2026-27

APPROVED
FY 2026-27

PROPOSED
City of Pico Rivera
General Fund Expenditure Detail
Historical Actuals and Proposed Budget
Fiscal Years 2022-23 through 2026-27
54420 - HEALTH & WELLNESS - - 11,657 - 15,000 - 72,000
54500 - CONTRACTED SERVICES 17,510,363 18,444,149 18,755,875 20,554,395 21,800,193 21,419,646 21,180,698 54510 - CONTRACT INSTRUCTORS 74,124 87,767 98,397 98,300 98,300 98,300 98,300 54530 - CREDIT CARD SERVICE CHARGE 1,419 (1,408) 5,325 3,736 6,789 3,736 3,736 54540 - COURT CHARGES 259,087 267,809 227,914 260,000 260,000 260,000 250,000 54605 - ASPHALT MAINTENANCE 48,945 44,776 55,594 50,000 97,000 50,000 50,000 54635 - GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 5,787 1,869 15,562 24,500 32,559 24,500 24,500 54640 - GRAFFITI ABATEMENT 188,038 363,292 392,930 404,858 404,858 424,101 424,101 54645 - MEDIAN ISLAND MAINTENANCE 7,768 77,194 125,980 81,472 65,283 81,472 81,472 54650 - SIGNAGE 14,862 37,835 32,569 30,150 30,150 30,150 30,150 54655 - STREET LIGHTS/SIGNALS 108,296 158,081 111,100 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 54660 - STREET PAINTINGS/MARKINGS 9,203 14,012 12,773 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 54670 - TREE CARE 5,712 3,277 3,746 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 54675 - WEED ABATEMENT 11,941 15,083 10,171 17,250 12,800 17,723 17,723 54700 - INSURANCE & SURETY BOND 703,209 879,858 1,297,260 1,391,087 1,190,807 1,648,157 1,583,392 54800 - CONVENTION & MTG EXPENSES 76,490 117,556 86,428 154,990 126,637 154,990 153,990 54810 - EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION 2,692 25,429 13,429 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 54900 - PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 19,511 14,982 21,273 54,063 32,598 56,563 63,863 54910 - TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 7,827 18,023 15,186 45,000 18,725 45,000 45,000 54930 - SAFETY PROGRAMS & MATERIALS 21,730 23,681 23,259 34,380 39,380 34,380 34,380 54935 - FIRST AID TREATMENT - 225 450 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 54940 - ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING 1,440 7,252 3,315 96,350 20,551 96,350 92,350 55280 - SENIOR CITIZEN COMMITTEE 73,504 65,142 69,736 - - - - 55285 - EVENT TICKETS 25,529 59,037 74,930 79,700 81,433 79,700 79,700 56205 - PERMITS - FEES - LICENSES 33,505 60,666 78,370 116,300 116,300 116,300 116,300 56850 - INTER DEPARTMENTAL CHARGES 226,950 341,500 341,500 911,500 911,500 974,325 864,043 56910 - LEGAL SERVICE 505,804 462,309 300,273 552,362 514,579 562,362 519,165 56978 - PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - 2016 BONDS 995,000 1,030,000 1,065,000 1,085,000 1,085,000 1,130,000 1,130,000 56979 - INTEREST PAYMENT - 2016 BONDS 926,250 888,775 860,550 828,200 828,200 783,900 783,900 56922 - PENALTIES 1,870 - - - - - -
56992 - BANK SERVICE CHARGES 49,492 52,745 60,995 53,900 68,490 53,900 71,700 56993 - MISC. EXPENSES 216 (6,370) 1,977 - 1,794 - -
57100 - LAND 512,715 - 1,000,806 - - - -
57120 - LOSS ON ASSET DISPOSAL - 196 - - - - -
57220 - LEASE PRINCIPAL EXPENDITURE 25,205 44,016 45,309 - 46,668 - - 57230 - LEASE INTEREST EXPENDITURE 1,876 4,560 3,268 - 3,366 - - 57260 - LEASE EXPENSE - 102,880 - - - - -
57300 - FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 321,390 80,457 11,555 41,097 82,539 41,340 46,340 57850 - CONTRA DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS (23,519) (22,952) (25,376) - (30,775) - - 57900 - REPLACEMENT ACCOUNT - 330,022 330,849 825,409 831,119 629,334 711,691 Subtotal - Maintenance and Operations 27,171,525 28,762,055 30,919,778 34,324,848 35,433,335 34,985,492 34,463,108 TOTAL - OPERATING EXPENDITURES 45,889,057 49,066,192 53,299,841 59,489,917 59,049,730 61,518,443 60,533,128 Non-Operating Transfer Out 6,080,613 9,286,473 9,315,311 4,065,000 11,570,356 3,000,000 4,500,000 TOTAL - GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 51,969,671 58,352,665 62,615,152 63,554,917 70,620,086 64,518,443 65,033,128 Actuals Actuals Actuals
Adopted
Budget Estimate
Approved
Budget
Proposed
Budget
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2026-27 *Excluding General Fund

ADMINISTRATION
Fund: 182 ICE Legal Aid Revenue - - 25,000 - 25,000 - - 182 ICE Legal Aid Expenditure - - - - 37,350 - -
221 California Beverage Container Revenue 685 1,703 27,409 2,200 70,920 2,100 19,568 221 California Beverage Container Expenditure 6,723 - - 15,510 24,251 15,468 70,000 560 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Revenue 24,389,553 28,765,231 29,050,353 29,113,255 28,548,576 29,329,310 28,294,610 560 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Expenditure 18,935,357 21,514,630 24,722,808 25,535,866 26,675,330 27,661,105 28,223,119 561 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Power Ch Revenue - - 12,971 - 42,659 - - 561 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Power Ch Expenditure - - 12,878 - 34,145 - - 590 Recreation Area Complex Revenue 330,704 365,786 394,511 393,100 316,468 407,600 37,500 590 Recreation Area Complex Expenditure (2,798) 236,496 351,754 227,464 238,531 219,731 243,859 670 Used Oil Recycle Revenue 10,897 4,308 5,165 12,734 3,632 12,312 11,412 670 Used Oil Recycle Expenditure - 9,634 8,776 8,634 8,634 8,412 8,412 671 CalRecycle Revenue 565,530 524,393 623,498 516,831 573,961 582,778 582,778 671 CalRecycle Expenditure 395,279 409,087 206,275 395,145 296,644 414,151 538,172

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Fund: 105 Liability Claims Revenue 680,818 615,688 1,857,579 739,000 2,297,397 775,950 362,049 105 Liability Claims Expenditure 598,156 938,412 1,919,208 739,000 1,523,426 775,950 708,000 106 Workers Compensation Claims Revenue 519,176 171,500 171,500 172,500 172,500 198,375 501,994 106 Workers Compensation Claims Expenditure 150,547 95,085 214,136 172,500 292,226 198,375 437,000 170 Equipment Replacement Revenue 241,274 1,620,187 489,915 906,780 951,576 699,700 796,284 170 Equipment Replacement Expenditure 25,089 163,412 449,162 331,000 438,250 331,000 494,100 450 Financial System Replacement Revenue 87,913 - - - 392,844 - 70,049 450 Financial System Replacement Expenditure - - - - 29,314 - 47,430 551 Water Enterprise Revenue 36,297 114,465 152,151 121,000 - 114,900 - 551 Water Enterprise Expenditure - - 4,544,655 - - - -
640 American Recovery Plan Revenue - - 2,396,080 - 2,593,439 - - 640 American Recovery Plan Expenditure - - 2,396,080 - 2,593,439 - - 851 Successor Agency - Debt Service Fund Revenue 6,716,953 5,979,569 9,202,585 1,065,000 94,559,590 - - 851 Successor Agency - Debt Service Fund Expenditure 2,236,165 2,418,287 2,595,795 203,925 3,306,967 - - 852 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund Revenue 3,944,340 7,135,270 4,794,518 - - - - 852 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund Expenditure 5,558,295 3,824,746 8,102,955 - 2,979,879 - - 854 Successor Sales Tax Revenue - - - - - - -
854 Successor Sales Tax Expenditure - 1,065,000 - - - - - 875 Section 115 PRSP-Trust Revenue 115,059 173,776 801,149 85,500 233,769 85,000 377,000 875 Section 115 PRSP-Trust Expenditure 7,026 7,745 10,065 - 13,602 - - -

COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -
Fund: 180 Strategic Goals- CED Revenue 1,835,000 - - - - - - 180 Strategic Goals- CED Expenditure 135,420 406,234 60,219 600,000 19,128 520,019 520,019 255 Economic Development Sustainability Revenue 55,926 94,072 106,818 48,900 76,185 46,400 35,700 255 Economic Development Sustainability Expenditure 39,667 119,596 177,314 - 51,306 - - 280 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Revenue 1,579,782 649,205 790,321 611,687 508,008 611,687 598,522 280 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Expenditure 1,734,555 778,131 560,186 589,764 566,956 589,764 598,522 282 HOME Program Revenue 91,693 160,181 286,283 105,800 408,379 100,500 108,600 282 HOME Program Expenditure - - - - - - -
283 CalHome Revenue 1,200 1,096 - - - - -
283 CalHome Expenditure - - - - - - -
290 Low Mod Income Housing Revenue 58,103 71,537 (197,569) 48,300 67,474 45,900 58,900 290 Low Mod Income Housing Expenditure - - - - - - -
291 Housing Assistance Program (Section 8) Revenue 6,205,840 6,998,764 7,171,558 6,170,061 7,636,416 6,170,061 7,804,046 291 Housing Assistance Program (Section 8) Expenditure 6,147,784 6,674,338 7,114,817 6,123,880 7,537,138 6,161,052 7,805,959 All Funds Revenue and Expenditures*
FY 2023-25 Actuals
FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget & Year-End Estimate
FY 2026-2027 Approved & Proposed Budgets
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A5
Actuals Actuals Actuals
Adopted
Budget Estimate
Approved
Budget
Proposed
Budget
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2026-27 All Funds Revenue and Expenditures*
FY 2023-25 Actuals
FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget & Year-End Estimate
FY 2026-2027 Approved & Proposed Budgets
-

PUBLIC WORKS -
Fund: 200 Air Quality Improvement (AB 2766) Revenue 85,013 102,064 124,449 110,294 98,475 108,894 95,394 200 Air Quality Improvement (AB 2766) Expenditure 35,484 43,580 352,680 34,600 352,462 34,600 34,600 201 State Gas Tax (Highway Users Tax) Revenue 1,557,851 1,679,327 1,723,969 1,734,275 1,719,344 1,768,960 1,768,961 201 State Gas Tax (Highway Users Tax) Expenditure 1,557,851 1,679,327 1,723,969 1,734,275 1,719,344 1,768,961 1,768,961 202 SB1 - Traffic Congestion Relief Revenue 1,466,573 1,744,569 1,925,798 1,798,644 1,940,082 1,822,847 1,961,832 202 SB1 - Traffic Congestion Relief Expenditure 2,846,511 1,865,050 314,890 1,745,453 4,563,241 1,753,700 1,840,576 206 Proposition C Revenue 1,438,157 1,550,177 1,479,598 1,439,681 1,475,756 1,459,081 1,426,689 206 Proposition C Expenditure 2,037,295 1,724,974 2,194,942 1,739,415 438,337 1,713,821 1,418,821 207 Measure R Revenue 1,368,543 2,110,814 1,533,485 1,155,935 1,824,866 1,166,710 1,149,017 207 Measure R Expenditure 1,336,049 841,450 1,806,915 1,175,015 615,071 1,175,015 975,015 208 Measure M Revenue 1,185,305 2,156,337 2,645,657 1,120,833 1,330,818 1,142,418 1,165,806 208 Measure M Expenditure 1,079,866 2,935,241 1,733,998 1,372,369 1,047,204 1,438,309 1,288,309 209 Measure W Revenue 927,214 998,093 1,013,995 994,466 957,610 989,466 972,766 209 Measure W Expenditure 192,525 881,639 1,925,984 1,648,750 589,715 1,657,588 905,588 210 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Revenue 28,110 41,664 77,523 98,586 141,649 74,558 80,000 210 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Expenditure 27,178 42,923 144,256 70,000 143,070 70,000 80,000 220 Public Image Enhancement (PIE) Revenue 790,177 232,645 329,461 77,500 92,245 73,700 47,900 220 Public Image Enhancement (PIE) Expenditure 627 165,032 49,056 - 1,141,727 - - 225 Sewer Maintenance Revenue 167 20,380 - - 3 - -
225 Sewer Maintenance Expenditure - - - - - - -
230 Landscape and Lighting Maint Assessment District Revenue 2,116,949 2,225,833 2,440,691 2,347,800 2,679,999 2,405,730 2,397,285 230 Landscape and Lighting Maint Assessment District Expenditure 1,020,901 1,543,168 1,399,412 2,179,749 6,046,389 2,358,628 2,397,285 231 Paramount/Mines Assessment District Revenue 12,321 15,539 18,084 16,600 17,439 16,760 16,760 231 Paramount/Mines Assessment District Expenditure - - - - - - - 263 Passons Grade Separation Revenue - - - - - - -
263 Passons Grade Separation Expenditure - 15,158 - - - - - 270 Park Development Revenue 2,413 94,571 456,548 5,200 1,000,674 4,900 37,500 270 Park Development Expenditure 227,000 - - - 705,550 - - 305 2018 Series A Certificates of Participation Revenue 1,101,424 1,093,902 1,042,580 1,081,569 895,265 1,072,819 906,919 305 2018 Series A Certificates of Participation Expenditure 8,390,716 1,057,429 4,767,554 885,669 2,288,169 833,919 833,919 400 Capital Improvement Revenue 2,290,695 7,425,469 7,681,987 3,000,000 9,761,329 3,000,000 5,671,100 400 Capital Improvement Expenditure 656,921 2,510,616 4,276,557 - 8,814,459 - - 550 Water Authority Revenue 13,838,551 15,036,147 15,709,241 14,491,955 17,219,397 14,807,977 14,822,537 550 Water Authority Expenditure 7,461,718 9,464,361 10,548,469 17,118,721 16,431,859 14,100,212 14,355,046 637 Gateway Cities Council of Governments (COG) Revenue - - - - - - - 637 Gateway Cities Council of Governments (COG) Expenditure - - - - - - - 638 Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL) Federal Revenue 268,579 298,764 - - - - - 638 Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL) Federal Expenditure 311,701 255,299 - - - - - 661 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Revenue 317,607 527,109 309,126 20,766,925 449,754 24,787,072 600,000 661 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Expenditure 459,649 476,484 407,528 20,766,925 258,099 24,787,072 600,000 697 Miscellaneous Local Grants Revenue 1,079,663 2,295,016 237,509 59,000 372,292 59,000 59,000 697 Miscellaneous Local Grants Expenditure 1,695,246 1,510,224 290,829 59,000 426,103 59,000 59,000 698 Miscellaneous Federal Grants Revenue 1,055,239 563,757 302,931 1,067,485 118,862 3,666,269 3,666,269 698 Miscellaneous Federal Grants Expenditure 1,363,965 69,909 229,220 1,067,485 207,609 3,666,269 3,666,269 699 Miscellaneous State Grants Revenue 486,134 1,268,340 13,450,288 2,861,200 2,677,816 668,720 1,948,720 699 Miscellaneous State Grants Expenditure 725,139 5,907,931 10,340,091 450,518 2,415,637 678,038 958,038 -

PARKS AND RECREATION -
Fund: 181 Community Benefit Revenue - - 210,000 - 417,000 - - 181 Community Benefit Expenditure - - - 83,562 627,000 90,671 - 205 Proposition A Revenue 1,737,582 1,865,117 1,899,343 1,799,863 1,829,432 1,820,028 1,672,948 205 Proposition A Expenditure 1,352,124 1,382,538 1,647,812 2,405,827 4,512,509 2,425,544 2,162,827 215 Measure A Revenue 2 - 0 - - - -
215 Measure A Expenditure - 0 - - - - -
250 Cable/PEG Support Revenue 54,077 76,802 52,563 - 48,589 - 50,000 250 Cable/PEG Support Expenditure 102,087 9,600 14,321 37,355 505,503 37,355 17,945 570 Golf Course Revenue 755,540 1,363,772 1,386,407 1,351,651 1,363,893 1,351,651 308,950 570 Golf Course Expenditure 1,421,792 1,774,466 2,027,882 2,147,257 1,765,054 2,203,498 772,012 690 Recreation & Education Accelerating Children's Hopes Revenue 1,452,730 1,152,193 1,221,740 1,037,400 980,584 1,035,500 1,093,492 690 Recreation & Education Accelerating Children's Hopes Expenditure 1,067,496 1,115,568 1,157,404 1,278,393 1,342,319 1,318,194 1,386,391 ALL FUNDS* TOTAL REVENUE 82,883,358 99,385,130 115,434,769 98,529,510 188,891,965 102,485,633 81,578,857 ALL FUNDS* TOTAL EXPENDITURES 71,337,106 75,932,796 100,800,852 92,943,026 103,622,945 99,065,421 75,215,194 *Excluding General Fund 11,546,252 23,452,334 14,633,917 5,586,484 85,269,020 3,420,212 6,363,664 Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget

ADMINISTRATION
Office of
Innovation & Communications
Director
Senior Analyst
City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
Junior Deputy
City Clerk
Sheriff Captain Director of
Public Works
Director of
Parks and Recreation
Office of Sustainability
Director
Coordinator (PRIME)
Sustainability Technician
Sr. Executive
Assistant
Executive Assistant
Director of
Administrative
Services
Director of
Community and Economic
Development
City Attorney
Residents of the City of Pico Rivera
City Council
City Manager
Assistant City
Manager
Information Technology
Senior I.T. Manager
I.T. Technician
Human Resources
Senior Manager
Technician
Coordinator
Enclosure 1, Exhibit B
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Director
Revenue/Utility Billing
Division Accounting Division
Deputy Director
Account
Clerk III
Finance
Technician
Payroll Division
Supervisor
(Revenue)
Account Clerk
III
Purchasing
Division
Finance
Technician
Account
Clerk III
Account
Clerk III Accountant III
Senior Manager
Accountant I
Executive Assistant
Technician
(B.L.)
Analyst
Senior Budget
Manager
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget

COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Executive Assistant Director
Secretary
Housing Current & Advanced
Planning
Planning
Commission
Deputy Director
Coordinator
Technician
Senior Analyst
Inspector
Assistant
Planner (2)
Senior Planner
Senior
Inspector
Planner Officers (4)
Parking
Enforcement
Counter
Service Rep
Officers (4)
Building Official
Emergency Services
Building & Safety
Technician
Specialist (2)
Administrative
Clerk
Economic
Development
Neighborhood
Services
Senior Manager
Coordinator
Secretary
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget

PARKS AND RECREATION
Coordinator
Supervisor
Executive Assistant Director
Recreation
Commission
Manager
Supervisor (2)
Coordinator
Coordinator (2)
Senior
Technician
Technician
Digital Media
Assistant
Supervisor
Analyst
Case Worker
Coordinator
Admin.

Clerk
Senior Analyst
Supervisor
Coordinator
Pico Rivera
Golf Course
Marketing &
Communications
Supervisor
Manager
Veterans
Commission
Admin. Clerk
Coordinator
Coordinator
Coordinator
Admin Clerk.

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget
Ad
e
e

PUBLIC WORKS
Water
Systems
Operator I
Customer Service
Representative
SupervisorParks
Maintenance
Worker II
Crew Leader
Water
Systems
Operator II
SupervisorFacilities
Facility
Maintenance
Worker II
Facility
Maintenance
Worker III
Facility
Maintenance
Worker I
Crew
Leader
Maintenance
Worker II
Utilities
Superintendent
Maintenance
Worker I
Associate
Engineer
Assistant
Engineer
Inspector
Counter Service
Representative
Maintenance
Worker I
Senior
Engineer
Custodian
Public Works
Superintendent
Water
Systems
Operator III
Secretary
SupervisorStreets
Equipment
Mechanic II
Technician
Senior Analyst
Secretary
Executive
Assistant
Principal Analyst
Deputy Director
Director
Treatment
Operator III
SupervisorDistribution
SupervisorTreatment/
Production
Treatment
Operator II
Treatment
Operator I
Equipment
Mechanic I
FY 25-26
Adopted
FY 26-27
Approved Filled Vacancies
FY 26-27
Proposed
City Manager / City Council
City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Assistant City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Director 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Senior Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Sr. Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
I.T. Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Senior I.T. Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Sustainability Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

11.00 11.00 11.00 0.00 11.00
City Clerk
City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Deputy City Clerk 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Junior Deputy City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00
Human Resources
Director of Human Resources 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Senior Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Human Resources Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Human Resources Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

4.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 4.00
Administrative Services
Director of Administrative Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Administrative Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Senior Manager - Accounting 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Senior Manager - Budget 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Accountant III 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Finance Technician 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00
Account Clerk III 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 4.00
Account Clerk II 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Budget and Financial Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

16.00 16.00 14.00 2.00 16.00
Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department
Authorized, Filled and Vacant
Fiscal Year 2026-27 (Proposed)
Enclosure 1, Exhibit C
FY 25-26
Adopted
FY 26-27
Approved Filled Vacancies
FY 26-27
Proposed
Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department
Authorized, Filled and Vacant
Fiscal Year 2026-27 (Proposed)
Community and Economic Development
Director of Community and Economic Development 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Secretary 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Administrative Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Senior Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Assistant Planner 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Senior Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Analyst (Economic Development) 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Technician (Economic Development) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager (Economic Development) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Neighborhood Improvement Officer 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 Coordinator (Parking Enforcement) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Parking Enforcement Officer 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00
Coordinator (Housing) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Housing Program Specialist 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Senior Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Technician (Building) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Building Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Counter Service Representative 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

30.00 30.00 29.00 1.00 30.00
Parks and Recreation
Director of Parks and Recreation 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Manager 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
Supervisor 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00
Senior Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Caseworker 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Coordinator 9.00 9.00 8.00 1.00 9.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Administrative Clerk 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00
Senior Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Digital and Media Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

28.00 28.00 26.00 2.00 28.00
FY 25-26
Adopted
FY 26-27
Approved Filled Vacancies
FY 26-27
Proposed
Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department
Authorized, Filled and Vacant
Fiscal Year 2026-27 (Proposed)
Public Works
Director of Public Works 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Deputy Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Assistant City Engineer 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Assistant Engineer 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Engineer 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Senior Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Public Works Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Utilities Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Supervisor 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00
Public Works Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Water Systems Operator I 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00
Water Systems Operator II 4.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 4.00
Water Systems Operator III 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Water Treatment Operator I 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Water Treatment Operator II 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Water Treatment Operator III 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Customer Service Representative 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Water Distribution Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Senior Water Treatment Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Facilities Maintenance Worker I 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 Facilities Maintenance Worker II 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Facilities Maintenance Worker III 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 Maintenance Crew Leader 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00
Maintenance Worker I 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 9.00
Maintenance Worker II 12.00 12.00 9.00 1.00 10.00
Principal Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Senior Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Technician (Engineering) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Counter Service Representative 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Secretary 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Equipment Mechanic II 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Equipment Mechanic I 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Custodian 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00

70.00 70.00 61.00 11.00 72.00
TOTALS 162.00 162.00 146.00 18.00 164.00
FY 25-26
Adopted
FY 26-27
Approved Filled Vacancies
FY 26-27
Proposed
Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department
Authorized, Filled and Vacant
Fiscal Year 2026-27 (Proposed)
Department
FY 25-26
Adopted
FY 26-27
Approved Filled Vacancies
FY 26-27
Proposed
Administration 14.00 14.00 13.00 1.00 14.00
Administrative Services 16.00 16.00 14.00 2.00 16.00
Human Resources 4.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 4.00
Community and Economic Development 30.00 30.00 29.00 1.00 30.00 Parks and Recreation 28.00 28.00 26.00 2.00 28.00
Public Works 70.00 70.00 61.00 11.00 72.00
TOTAL 162.00 162.00 146.00 18.00 164.00
FY 26-27 Proposed Reclassifications
Administration
Human Resources Director (Reclass to Senior Manager) 1.00 Total Administration 1.00
Community & Economic Development
Analyst (Reclass to Technician) 1.00
Total Community & Economic Development 1.00
Public Works
Assistant City Engineer (Reclass to Assistant Engineer) 1.00 Total Public Works 1.00
TOTALS 3.00
FY 26-27 Proposed Reclassifications
Administration 1.00
Community & Economic Development 1.00
Public Works 1.00
TOTAL 3.00
The Proposed FY 2026-27 budget includes 3 positions for reclassification.

Proposed Reclassification Positions, by Classification and Department Proposed Position Reclassifications
Fiscal Year 2026-27
FY 26-27 New
Public Works
Maintenance Worker I 4.00
Total Public Works 4.00
TOTALS 4.00
FY 26-27 New
Public Works 4.00
TOTAL 4.00
The Proposed FY 2026-27 budget includes 4 new positions.

Proposed New Positions, by Classification and Department Proposed Position Additions
Fiscal Year 2026-27
FY 26-27 Proposed Eliminations
Administration
Director (Human Resources) 1.00
Total Administration 1.00
Community & Economic Development
Analyst 1.00
Total Community & Economic Development 1.00
Public Works
Assistant City Engineer 1.00
Maintenance Worker II 2.00
Total Public Works 3.00
TOTALS 5.00
FY 26-27 Proposed Eliminations
Administration 1.00
Community & Economic Development 1.00
Public Works 3.00
TOTAL 5.00
The Proposed FY 2025-27 budget includes 5 positions for elimination.

Proposed Eliminations Positions, by Classification and Department Proposed Position Eliminations
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Project by Fiscal Year and Fund, including both funded and unfunded General
Fund
SB1- Traffic
Congestion
Relief
Proposition
C Measure R
Measure
M
Measure
W
Transportation
Dev Acccount
CDBGCFDA
#14.218
2018
Series A
Cert of
Part
Capital
Improvement
Fund
PRIME
Fund
Highway
Bridge
Program
(HBP)
Miscellaneous
Local Grant
Miscellaneous
Federal Grant
Miscellaneous
State Grant
Water
Authority Unfunded Grand Total
Ongoing 240,811 11,826,197 10,103,351 5,298,141 4,878,633 1,607,892 390,907 1,260 1,303,987 44,237,525 499,539 53,637,115 7,411,816 16,558,631 23,576,322 23,844,557 9,396,180 214,812,861 Sum of FY 2026-27 (Includes Carryover) 240,811 7,626,197 7,053,351 3,298,141 4,798,633 1,607,892 220,907 1,260 1,303,987 35,537,525 499,539 29,450,043 7,411,816 16,558,631 23,576,322 23,844,557 5,018,488 168,048,097 1STREETS 7,626,197 2,514,248 2,681,596 546,264 86,782 159,567 1,303,987 15,072,676 200,000 975,000 280,414 31,446,730 Annual Sidewalk Improvements Project FY 2023-24 788,508 159,567 948,075 Annual Signing and Striping Project FY 2025-26 214,955 214,955 Citywide Roadway Resurfacing and Reconstruction 2025–27 3,609,885 1,793,115 5,403,000 Durfee Ave Underpass Project 48,544 83,406 131,950
Gallatin Rd and Paramount Bl Safety Street Improvements 250,000 250,000 Los Paseos - Phase 1 200,000 850,000 1,050,000
Major Arterials Signing and Striping Project 129,353 125,000 254,353 Major Corridors Median Beautification Project 152,606 197,624 7,412 505,435 863,077 Road Resurfacing Program - Overlay and Reconstruction 4,016,312 1,500,000 700,000 1,303,987 12,632,312 20,152,610 Rosemead Blvd Median Beautification Project 313,098 79,370 52,042 280,414 724,924 Telegraph Road over Rio Hondo Channel Bridge Project 401,156 6,366 407,522 Underpasses Improvements (Passons, Paramount & Rosemead) BOD Report 500,000 546,264 1,046,264 2BRIDGES 4,248,132 381,617 3,665,187 180 7,553 214,071 29,450,043 2,452,186 40,418,969 Annual Citywide Bridge Repairs Project 893,722 893,722
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Prog-Coop Agreement with LACPW 227,700 227,700 Pico Rivera Regional Bikeway Project 16,349 180 7,553 11,368 83,662 119,112 Pio Pico Connector Project 200,000 200,000
Regional Trail Entrances and City Entry Points Safety Improvement Project 391,473 2,368,524 2,759,997 Rehabilitation Telegraph Rd Bridge Over San Gabriel River 2,340,358 21,039,757 23,380,116 Rehabilitation Washington Blvd Bridge Over Rio Hondo River 323,526 3,665,187 8,410,285 12,398,999 Slauson Avenue over San Gabriel River Bridge Seismic Retrofit 25,868 25,868 Washington Blvd over RHC - Bridge Emergency Deck Repair 45,484 2,704 48,188 Whittier Blvd. Underpass East of Orange St. Slope Repairs 365,268 365,268 3WATER 139,908 2,500,000 23,544,557 26,184,464
City Yard Generator, Transfer Switch & Main Electrical Panel 139,908 108,838 248,745 Construction - Water Main Replacement W41,W98,W110 1,349,181 1,349,181 PFAS Treatment System Project - Phase II - Federalize 2,500,000 1,896,150 4,396,150 Storage Tanks 6,634,000 6,634,000
Upsize Existing 4-inch Water Main to 8-inch Ductile Iron Pipe 12,852,469 12,852,469 Water Main Replacement (W110) 607,399 607,399
Water Wells 7,8,9 & 10 Destruction Project 96,520 96,520 4PARKS 550,000 17,522,141 299,539 7,411,816 7,041,930 20,453,429 1,825,000 55,103,855 Dog Park 112,144 112,144
Park Exercising Equipment 900,000 900,000
Pico Park Playground Resurfacing 250,000 250,000
Pico Park Security Camera System 198,666 198,666
Rio Hondo Park 350,000 1,169,654 7,781,775 9,301,429
Rio Hondo Park - Soccer Field 250,000 947,331 1,197,331 Rivera Park Batting Cage 600,000 600,000
Rivera Park enhanced safety netting on field 75,000 75,000 Rivera Park Sandbox Playground Resurfacing 300,000 300,000 Smith Park Aquatic Center Renovation 200,000 15,229,702 7,411,816 6,000,000 8,724,323 37,565,842 Smith Park Security Camera System 161,902 161,902
The PAD Park - Phase II 100,073 299,539 1,041,930 3,000,000 4,441,542 5FACILITIES 214,527 114,546 452,055 1,260 1,787,225 349,920 300,000 2,430,000 5,649,534 City Yard - NPDES Compliance 167,055 167,055
City Yard Stormwater Clarifier Improvements Project 285,000 285,000 HSIP Cycle 12 - Pedestrian School Xings 114,546 349,920 464,466 HVAC Installation (Pico/Rivera Gyms) and Replacement at various City facilities 1,443,172 1,443,172 IDEA Lab Design 214,527 214,527
Install Wrought Iron Fencing at Water Plant 2 300,000 300,000

Page 1 of 3 ends

Enclosure 1, Exhibit D
General
Fund
SB1- Traffic
Congestion
Relief
Proposition
C Measure R
Measure
M
Measure
W
Transportation
Dev Acccount
CDBGCFDA
#14.218
2018
Series A
Cert of
Part
Capital
Improvement
Fund
PRIME
Fund
Highway
Bridge
Program
(HBP)
Miscellaneous
Local Grant
Miscellaneous
Federal Grant
Miscellaneous
State Grant
Water
Authority Unfunded Grand Total
Pico Park (26) Interior and (36) Exterior Doors 600,000 600,000 Pico Park Indoor Restrooms Renovation 150,000 150,000
Pico Park Outdoor Gymnasium Restroom Renovation 400,000 400,000 Rivera Park Office/Auditorium/Lobby Flooring replacement 120,000 120,000 Rivera Park Sound Panels 90,000 90,000
Roofing - City Yard Administration Building 50,000 100,000 150,000 Roofing - Parks and Rec Administration Building 50,000 400,000 450,000 Roofing - Pico Park Community Center 50,000 260,000 310,000 Roofing - Rio Hondo Park Community Center 50,000 310,000 360,000 Teen Center Renovation - Construction 1,260 144,053 145,313 6TRAFFIC 290,970 234,928 472,636 53,787 3,589,515 2,492,559 7,134,395 Citywide Sign Audit and Roadway Safety Sign Enhancement Project 234,928 2,273,859 2,508,787 CitywideTraffic Signal Safety Enhancements Project 171,497 1,690,425 1,861,922 HSIP Cycle 12 - Traffic Signal Improvements Citywide Project 301,139 1,899,090 2,200,229 School Crossings Safety Enhancements Project 53,787 218,700 272,487 Slauson Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP) 290,970 290,970 7STORMDRAINS 26,284 518,875 545,159
Bartolo Storm Drain Improvements and Relinquishment 26,284 26,284 Catch Basin Device Installation 518,875 518,875
8SEWER 801,503 763,488 1,564,991
Sewer Main Improvements 801,503 763,488 1,564,991
Sum of FY 2027-28 1,400,000 1,250,000 800,000 80,000 70,000 2,700,000 24,187,072 30,487,072 1STREETS 1,400,000 500,000 800,000 70,000 2,700,000 5,470,000 Annual Sidewalk Improvements Project FY 2023-24 300,000 70,000 370,000 Citywide Roadway Resurfacing and Reconstruction 2025–27 1,400,000 300,000 1,700,000 Road Resurfacing Program - Overlay and Reconstruction 500,000 2,700,000 3,200,000 Telegraph Road over Rio Hondo Channel Bridge Project 200,000 200,000 2BRIDGES 750,000 24,187,072 24,937,072
Annual Citywide Bridge Repairs Project 500,000 500,000
Regional Trail Entrances and City Entry Points Safety Improvement Project 250,000 250,000 Rehabilitation Washington Blvd Bridge Over Rio Hondo River 24,187,072 24,187,072 5FACILITIES 30,000 30,000
HSIP Cycle 12 - Pedestrian School Xings 30,000 30,000
6TRAFFIC 50,000 50,000
HSIP Cycle 12 - Traffic Signal Improvements Citywide Project 50,000 50,000 Sum of FY 2028-29 1,400,000 900,000 600,000 50,000 3,000,000 577,692 6,527,692 1STREETS 1,400,000 700,000 600,000 50,000 3,000,000 577,692 6,327,692 Annual Sidewalk Improvements Project FY 2023-24 300,000 50,000 350,000 Citywide Roadway Resurfacing and Reconstruction 2025–27 1,400,000 300,000 1,700,000 Road Resurfacing Program - Overlay and Reconstruction 500,000 3,000,000 577,692 4,077,692 Underpasses Improvements (Passons, Paramount & Rosemead) BOD Report 200,000 200,000 2BRIDGES 200,000 200,000
Annual Citywide Bridge Repairs Project 200,000 200,000
Sum of FY 2029-30 1,400,000 900,000 600,000 50,000 3,000,000 3,800,000 9,750,000 1STREETS 1,400,000 700,000 600,000 50,000 3,000,000 3,800,000 9,550,000 Annual Sidewalk Improvements Project FY 2023-24 300,000 50,000 350,000 Citywide Roadway Resurfacing and Reconstruction 2025–27 1,400,000 300,000 1,700,000 Road Resurfacing Program - Overlay and Reconstruction 500,000 3,000,000 3,800,000 7,300,000 Underpasses Improvements (Passons, Paramount & Rosemead) BOD Report 200,000 200,000 2BRIDGES 200,000 200,000
Annual Citywide Bridge Repairs Project 200,000 200,000
Proposed 940,000 389,040 570,000 2,130,000 5,840,000 9,869,040 Sum of FY 2026-27 (Includes Carryover) 220,000 389,040 270,000 630,000 2,420,000 3,929,040 1STREETS 220,000 389,040 609,040
ADA Sidewalk Improvements - CDBG FY 2026-27 389,040 389,040

Page 2 of 3 ends

General
Fund
SB1- Traffic
Congestion
Relief
Proposition
C Measure R
Measure
M
Measure
W
Transportation
Dev Acccount
CDBGCFDA
#14.218
2018
Series A
Cert of
Part
Capital
Improvement
Fund
PRIME
Fund
Highway
Bridge
Program
(HBP)
Miscellaneous
Local Grant
Miscellaneous
Federal Grant
Miscellaneous
State Grant
Water
Authority Unfunded Grand Total
Annual Signing and Striping Project FY 2026-27 220,000 220,000 3WATER 270,000 630,000 900,000
Burke St Water Main Replacement 270,000 630,000 900,000 4PARKS 680,000 680,000
Pico Boys Field 680,000 680,000
5FACILITIES 1,740,000 1,740,000
City Hall HVAC Replacement 700,000 700,000
Parks & Recreation Administration HVAC Replacement 500,000 500,000 Pico Rivera Historical Museum Renovation Phase 1 200,000 200,000 Pico Rivera Historical Museum Renovation Phase 2 340,000 340,000 Sum of FY 2027-28 220,000 300,000 850,000 3,420,000 4,790,000 1STREETS 220,000 220,000
Annual Signing and Striping Project FY 2026-27 220,000 220,000 3WATER 300,000 850,000 1,150,000
Construct Interconnections with Pico Water District 150,000 150,000 Burke St Water Main Replacement 300,000 700,000 1,000,000 4PARKS 1,320,000 1,320,000
Pico Boys Pico Park Ballfield Improvements 1,320,000 1,320,000 5FACILITIES 2,100,000 2,100,000
City Hall HVAC Replacement 1,300,000 1,300,000
Parks & Recreation Administration HVAC Replacement 800,000 800,000 Sum of FY 2028-29 250,000 400,000 650,000
1STREETS 250,000 250,000
Annual Signing and Striping Project FY 2026-27 250,000 250,000 3WATER 400,000 400,000
Construct Interconnections with Pico Water District 400,000 400,000 Sum of FY 2029-30 250,000 250,000 500,000
1STREETS 250,000 250,000
Annual Signing and Striping Project FY 2026-27 250,000 250,000 3WATER 250,000 250,000
Construct Interconnections with Pico Water District 250,000 250,000 Grand Total 240,811 11,826,197 10,103,351 6,238,141 4,878,633 1,607,892 390,907 390,300 1,303,987 44,807,525 499,539 53,637,115 7,411,816 16,558,631 23,576,322 25,974,557 15,236,180 224,681,901

Page 3 of 3 ends

Project by Fiscal Year, including both funded and unfunded Projects
Estimated
Carryover
Sum of
FY 2026-27
Sum of
FY 2027-28
Sum of
FY 2028-29
Sum of
FY 2029-30
Sum of 5-
Year Total
Budget
Sum of Total
Project Life
Budget
Ongoing 154,709,897 13,338,200 30,487,072 6,527,692 9,750,000 214,812,861 242,031,239 1STREETS 26,046,730 5,400,000 5,470,000 6,327,692 9,550,000 52,794,422 62,247,110 Annual Sidewalk Improvements Project FY 2023-24 578,075 370,000 370,000 350,000 350,000 2,018,075 2,080,000 Annual Signing and Striping Project FY 2025-26 214,955 214,955 220,000 Citywide Roadway Resurfacing and Reconstruction 2025–27 3,903,000 1,500,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 10,503,000 10,508,000 Durfee Ave Underpass Project 131,950 131,950 777,436
Gallatin Rd and Paramount Bl Safety Street Improvements 250,000 250,000 250,000 Los Paseos - Phase 1 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000
Major Arterials Signing and Striping Project 254,353 254,353 265,000 Major Corridors Median Beautification Project 863,077 863,077 4,410,390 Road Resurfacing Program - Overlay and Reconstruction 16,622,610 3,530,000 3,200,000 4,077,692 7,300,000 34,730,302 34,934,543 Rosemead Blvd Median Beautification Project 724,924 724,924 5,591,557 Telegraph Road over Rio Hondo Channel Bridge Project 407,522 200,000 607,522 660,184 Underpasses Improvements (Passons, Paramount & Rosemead) BOD Report 1,046,264 200,000 200,000 1,446,264 1,500,000 2BRIDGES 36,968,869 3,450,100 24,937,072 200,000 200,000 65,756,041 73,281,371 Annual Citywide Bridge Repairs Project 393,722 500,000 500,000 200,000 200,000 1,793,722 1,800,000 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Prog-Coop Agreement with LACPW 227,700 227,700 430,000 Pico Rivera Regional Bikeway Project 119,112 119,112 4,493,487 Pio Pico Connector Project 200,000 200,000 200,000
Regional Trail Entrances and City Entry Points Safety Improvement Project 409,897 2,350,100 250,000 3,009,997 3,090,100 Rehabilitation Telegraph Rd Bridge Over San Gabriel River 23,380,116 23,380,116 24,672,149 Rehabilitation Washington Blvd Bridge Over Rio Hondo River 11,798,999 600,000 24,187,072 36,586,071 37,692,635 Slauson Avenue over San Gabriel River Bridge Seismic Retrofit 25,868 25,868 150,000 Washington Blvd over RHC - Bridge Emergency Deck Repair 48,188 48,188 328,000 Whittier Blvd. Underpass East of Orange St. Slope Repairs 365,268 365,268 425,000 3WATER 26,184,464 26,184,464 28,580,000
City Yard Generator, Transfer Switch & Main Electrical Panel 248,745 248,745 315,000 Construction - Water Main Replacement W41,W98,W110 1,349,181 1,349,181 3,080,000 PFAS Treatment System Project - Phase II - Federalize 4,396,150 4,396,150 4,500,000 Storage Tanks 6,634,000 6,634,000 6,634,000
Upsize Existing 4-inch Water Main to 8-inch Ductile Iron Pipe 12,852,469 12,852,469 12,951,000 Water Main Replacement (W110) 607,399 607,399 850,000
Water Wells 7,8,9 & 10 Destruction Project 96,520 96,520 250,000 4PARKS 53,053,855 2,050,000 55,103,855 60,242,364
Dog Park 112,144 112,144 1,100,000
Park Exercising Equipment 900,000 900,000 900,000
Pico Park Playground Resurfacing 250,000 250,000 250,000 Pico Park Security Camera System 198,666 198,666 200,000

Page 1 of 3 ends

Projects
Estimated
Carryover
Sum of
FY 2026-27
Sum of
FY 2027-28
Sum of
FY 2028-29
Sum of
FY 2029-30
Sum of 5-
Year Total
Budget
Sum of Total
Project Life
Budget
Rio Hondo Park 8,951,429 350,000 9,301,429 10,020,000
Rio Hondo Park - Soccer Field 1,197,331 1,197,331 1,197,331 Rivera Park Batting Cage 600,000 600,000 600,000
Rivera Park enhanced safety netting on field 75,000 75,000 75,000 Rivera Park Sandbox Playground Resurfacing 300,000 300,000 300,000 Smith Park Aquatic Center Renovation 35,865,842 1,700,000 37,565,842 40,960,760 Smith Park Security Camera System 161,902 161,902 163,200 The PAD Park - Phase II 4,441,542 4,441,542 4,476,073
5FACILITIES 5,107,534 542,000 30,000 5,679,534 7,442,456 City Yard - NPDES Compliance 167,055 167,055 175,000
City Yard Stormwater Clarifier Improvements Project 285,000 285,000 300,000 HSIP Cycle 12 - Pedestrian School Xings 72,466 392,000 30,000 494,466 500,000 HVAC Installation (Pico/Rivera Gyms) and Replacement at various City facilities 1,443,172 1,443,172 2,043,000 IDEA Lab Design 214,527 214,527 214,527
Install Wrought Iron Fencing at Water Plant 2 300,000 300,000 300,000 Pico Park (26) Interior and (36) Exterior Doors 600,000 600,000 600,000 Pico Park Indoor Restrooms Renovation 150,000 150,000 150,000 Pico Park Outdoor Gymnasium Restroom Renovation 400,000 400,000 400,000 Rivera Park Office/Auditorium/Lobby Flooring replacement 120,000 120,000 120,000 Rivera Park Sound Panels 90,000 90,000 90,000
Roofing - City Yard Administration Building 150,000 150,000 150,000 Roofing - Parks and Rec Administration Building 450,000 450,000 450,000 Roofing - Pico Park Community Center 310,000 310,000 310,000 Roofing - Rio Hondo Park Community Center 360,000 360,000 360,000 Teen Center Renovation - Construction 145,313 145,313 1,279,929 6TRAFFIC 5,238,295 1,896,100 50,000 7,184,395 7,939,490 Citywide Sign Audit and Roadway Safety Sign Enhancement Project 2,508,787 2,508,787 2,839,170 CitywideTraffic Signal Safety Enhancements Project 1,861,922 1,861,922 2,167,720 HSIP Cycle 12 - Traffic Signal Improvements Citywide Project 309,129 1,891,100 50,000 2,250,229 2,260,100 School Crossings Safety Enhancements Project 267,487 5,000 272,487 372,500 Slauson Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP) 290,970 290,970 300,000 7STORMDRAINS 545,159 545,159 733,456
Bartolo Storm Drain Improvements and Relinquishment 26,284 26,284 138,456 Catch Basin Device Installation 518,875 518,875 595,000 8SEWER 1,564,991 1,564,991 1,564,991
Sewer Main Improvements 1,564,991 1,564,991 1,564,991
Proposed 3,929,040 4,790,000 650,000 500,000 9,869,040 9,869,040 1STREETS 609,040 220,000 250,000 250,000 1,329,040 1,329,040 ADA Sidewalk Improvements - CDBG FY 2026-27 389,040 389,040 389,040

Page 2 of 3 ends

Projects
Estimated
Carryover
Sum of
FY 2026-27
Sum of
FY 2027-28
Sum of
FY 2028-29
Sum of
FY 2029-30
Sum of 5-
Year Total
Budget
Sum of Total
Project Life
Budget
Annual Signing and Striping Project FY 2026-27 220,000 220,000 250,000 250,000 940,000 940,000 3WATER 900,000 1,150,000 400,000 250,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 Construct Interconnections with Pico Water District 150,000 400,000 250,000 800,000 800,000 Burke St Water Main Replacement 900,000 1,000,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 4PARKS 680,000 1,320,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Pico Boys Pico Park Ballfield Improvements 680,000 1,320,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 5FACILITIES 1,740,000 2,100,000 3,840,000 3,840,000
City Hall HVAC Replacement 700,000 1,300,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Parks & Recreation Administration HVAC Replacement 500,000 800,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 Pico Rivera Historical Museum Renovation Phase 1 200,000 200,000 200,000 Pico Rivera Historical Museum Renovation Phase 2 340,000 340,000 340,000 Grand Total 154,709,897 17,267,240 35,277,072 7,177,692 10,250,000 224,681,901 251,900,279

Page 3 of 3 ends

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

CIP PROJECT REQUEST FORM
PROJECT NAME:

PROJECT MANAGER:

DEPARTMENT:

NAME OF REQUESTER: DATE:

Project Type:  Streets  Traffic
 Bridges  Storm Drain
 Water  Sewer
 Parks  Studies
 Facilities  Other (please explain)
 Non-CIP  CIP
Please provide project parameters (i.e., geographic location) No
End Dates:
 Low - Project can be deferred without significant negative impact(s)  Medium - Project cannot be deferred without some negative impact(s)  High - Project must be implemented due to mandates, public safety concerns, etc.

Cost Estimate: $ 800,000.00 Water Main Replacement Ongoing / Maintenance Cost:
$ 1,100,000.00 Roadway Reconstruction per/
$ 1,900,000.00 TOTAL
Federal/State Grant:  Yes Local Match Fund Amount (if applicable ):
 No Fund deadline:

Reporting and Audit
Requirements:

Project
No.

Carryover
(if applicable)
Proposed
Fiscal Year
1 Proposed
Fiscal Year
2 Proposed
Fiscal Year
3 Proposed
Fiscal Year
4 Proposed
Fiscal Year
5 Proposed
beyond
$ 200,000
$ 700,000 $ 1,000,000
$ - $ 900,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 630,000 $ 700,000
$ 270,000 $ 300,000
$ - $ 900,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Select 1
$ -
Total $ 1,900,000
Fund 400 $ 570,000
$ -
$ -
Total $ 1,900,000
Funding Sources
Fund 550 - Water Authority $ 1,330,000
Environmental $ -
Construction $ 1,700,000
Maintenance $ -
Right of Way $ -
Cost and Funding Information
$
$
Date
Total Budget
Design $ 200,000
If Yes, Assistance Listing
Numbers and/or Grant ID:

Priority Assessment:

Project Limits:

Burke Street from Passons Boulevard to East End
Are there any existing plans, maps or other supporting documentation for this project? (to be provided upon request)
Project Description: This project replaces the 50 year old water main with a new larger diameter pipe. The project also reconstructs the roadway along Burke Street from Passons Boulevard to its east end.

Project Justification: The water main is undersized and is beyond its service life and is prone to leakage or failure. The roadway has a PCI below 10 and is also beyond its service life.

Project Approval: Established within the 5-year CIP Budget or Date Presented to City Council:

Council Agenda (Attach):

Resolution No. (Attach If Applicable):
(If not presented, provide explanation)
To be presented to the City Council on 6/23/2026.

Year Two of the 5-Year CIP FY 2026-30.

Estimated Start and Design 7/1/26 - 3/21/27
Construction 4/1/27 - 4/1/28
Select 1

USED BY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Project Number Assigned
CIP 50140
Burke St Water Main Replacement and Roadway Reconstruction Gene Edwards
Public Works
Gene Edwards 4/20/2026
Project Information

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

CIP PROJECT REQUEST FORM
PROJECT NAME:

PROJECT MANAGER:

DEPARTMENT:

NAME OF REQUESTER: DATE:

Project Type:  Streets  Traffic
 Bridges  Storm Drain
 Water  Sewer
 Parks  Studies
 Facilities  Other (please explain)
 Non-CIP  CIP
6615 Passons Blvd, Pico Rivera, CA 90660
No
End Dates:
 Low - Project can be deferred without significant negative impact(s)  Medium - Project cannot be deferred without some negative impact(s)  High - Project must be implemented due to mandates, public safety concerns, etc.

Cost Estimate: Ongoing / Maintenance Cost:
per/
Federal/State Grant:  Yes Local Match Fund Amount (if applicable ):
 No Fund deadline:

Reporting and Audit
Requirements:

Project
No.

Carryover
(if applicable)
Proposed
Fiscal Year
1 Proposed
Fiscal Year
2 Proposed
Fiscal Year
3 Proposed
Fiscal Year
4 Proposed
Fiscal Year
5 Proposed
beyond
$ 200,000
$ 500,000 $ 1,300,000
$ - $ 700,000 $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 700,000 $ 1,300,000
$ - $ 700,000 $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ -
Total $ 2,000,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total $ 2,000,000
Funding Sources
Unfunded $ 2,000,000
Environmental $ -
Construction $ 1,800,000
Maintenance $ -
Total Budget
Design $ 200,000
Right of Way $ -
Priority Assessment:

Cost and Funding Information
$ 2,000,000.00 $
If Yes, Assistance Listing
Numbers and/or Grant ID:
$
Date
Estimated Start and Design 7/1/26 - 3/21/27
Construction 4/1/27 - 4/1/28
Select 1
Project Limits:

Are there any existing plans, maps or other supporting documentation for this project? (to be provided upon request)
Project Description: This project replaces the HVAC system in City Hall.

Project Justification: The HVAC system in City Hall is beyond its service life needing costly repairs and having high energy consumption. This project replaces the system with a new reliable and low energy model.

Project Approval: Established within the 5-year CIP Budget or Date Presented to City Council:

Council Agenda (Attach):

Resolution No. (Attach If Applicable):
(If not presented, provide explanation)
Gene Edwards 4/20/2026
Project Information
Select 1
Public Works

USED BY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Project Number Assigned
City Hall HVAC Replacement
Gene Edwards

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

CIP PROJECT REQUEST FORM
PROJECT NAME:

PROJECT MANAGER:

DEPARTMENT:

NAME OF REQUESTER: DATE:

Project Type:  Streets  Traffic
 Bridges  Storm Drain
 Water  Sewer
 Parks  Studies
 Facilities  Other (please explain)
 Non-CIP  CIP
6767 Passons Blvd, Pico Rivera, CA 90660
No
End Dates:
 Low - Project can be deferred without significant negative impact(s)  Medium - Project cannot be deferred without some negative impact(s)  High - Project must be implemented due to mandates, public safety concerns, etc.

Cost Estimate: Ongoing / Maintenance Cost:
per/
Federal/State Grant:  Yes Local Match Fund Amount (if applicable ):
 No Fund deadline:

Reporting and Audit
Requirements:

Project
No.

Carryover
(if applicable)
Proposed
Fiscal Year
1 Proposed
Fiscal Year
2 Proposed
Fiscal Year
3 Proposed
Fiscal Year
4 Proposed
Fiscal Year
5 Proposed
beyond
$ 100,000
$ 400,000 $ 800,000
$ - $ 500,000 $ 800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 500,000 $ 800,000
$ - $ 500,000 $ 800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ -
Total $ 1,300,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total $ 1,300,000
Funding Sources
Unfunded $ 1,300,000
Environmental $ -
Construction $ 1,200,000
Maintenance $ -
Total Budget
Design $ 100,000
Right of Way $ -
Priority Assessment:

Cost and Funding Information
$ 1,300,000.00 $
If Yes, Assistance Listing
Numbers and/or Grant ID:
$
Date
Estimated Start and Design 7/1/26 - 3/21/27
Construction 4/1/27 - 4/1/28
Select 1
Project Limits:

Are there any existing plans, maps or other supporting documentation for this project? (to be provided upon request)
Project Description: This project replaces the HVAC system in the Parks and Recreation Administrative Building Project Justification: The HVAC system in the Parks and Recreation Administrative Building is beyond its service life needing costly repairs and having high energy consumption. This project replaces the system with a new reliable and low energy model.

Project Approval: Established within the 5-year CIP Budget or Date Presented to City Council:

Council Agenda (Attach):

Resolution No. (Attach If Applicable):
(If not presented, provide explanation)
Gene Edwards 4/20/2026
Project Information
Select 1
Public Works

USED BY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Project Number Assigned
Parks and Rec Administration Building HVAC Replacement
Gene Edwards

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

CIP PROJECT REQUEST FORM
PROJECT NAME:

PROJECT MANAGER:

DEPARTMENT:

NAME OF REQUESTER: DATE:

Project Type:  Streets  Traffic
 Bridges  Storm Drain
 Water  Sewer
 Parks  Studies
 Facilities  Other (please explain)
 Non-CIP  CIP
9122 Washington Blvd, Pico Rivera, CA 90660
No
End Dates:
 Low - Project can be deferred without significant negative impact(s)  Medium - Project cannot be deferred without some negative impact(s)  High - Project must be implemented due to mandates, public safety concerns, etc.

Cost Estimate: $ 200,000.00 Ongoing / Maintenance Cost:
per/
Federal/State Grant:  Yes Local Match Fund Amount (if applicable ):
 No Fund deadline:

Reporting and Audit
Requirements:

Project
No.

Carryover
(if applicable)
Proposed
Fiscal Year
1 Proposed
Fiscal Year
2 Proposed
Fiscal Year
3 Proposed
Fiscal Year
4 Proposed
Fiscal Year
5 Proposed
beyond
$ 30,000
$ 170,000
$ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 200,000 $ -
$ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ -
Total $ 200,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total $ 200,000
Funding Sources
Unfunded $ 200,000
Environmental $ -
Construction $ 170,000
Maintenance $ -
Total Budget
Design $ 30,000
Right of Way $ -
Priority Assessment:

Cost and Funding Information
$
If Yes, Assistance Listing
Numbers and/or Grant ID:
$
Date
Estimated Start and Design 7/1/26 - 3/21/27
Construction 4/1/27 - 4/1/28
Select 1
Project Limits:

Are there any existing plans, maps or other supporting documentation for this project? (to be provided upon request)
Project Description: Phase 1 project renovates the Pico Rivera Historical Museum, a History and Heritage landmark of the City.

This phase scope of work includes new windows, bathrooms, roof and HVAC.

Project Justification: This project renovates the Pico Rivera Historical Museum with repairs necessary to preserve the building from futher deterioration.

Renovations needed will extend the usable life of the building, preserving this cultural resource.

Project Approval: Established within the 5-year CIP Budget or Date Presented to City Council:

Council Agenda (Attach):

Resolution No. (Attach If Applicable):
(If not presented, provide explanation)
Gene Edwards 4/20/2026
Project Information
Select 1
Public Works

USED BY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Project Number Assigned
Pico Rivera Historical Museum Renovation (Phase 1)
Gene Edwards

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

CIP PROJECT REQUEST FORM
PROJECT NAME:

PROJECT MANAGER:

DEPARTMENT:

NAME OF REQUESTER: DATE:

Project Type:  Streets  Traffic
 Bridges  Storm Drain
 Water  Sewer
 Parks  Studies
 Facilities  Other (please explain)
 Non-CIP  CIP
9122 Washington Blvd, Pico Rivera, CA 90660
No
End Dates:
 Low - Project can be deferred without significant negative impact(s)  Medium - Project cannot be deferred without some negative impact(s)  High - Project must be implemented due to mandates, public safety concerns, etc.

Cost Estimate: $ 340,000.00 Ongoing / Maintenance Cost:
per/
Federal/State Grant:  Yes Local Match Fund Amount (if applicable ):
 No Fund deadline:

Reporting and Audit
Requirements:

Project
No.

Carryover
(if applicable)
Proposed
Fiscal Year
1 Proposed
Fiscal Year
2 Proposed
Fiscal Year
3 Proposed
Fiscal Year
4 Proposed
Fiscal Year
5 Proposed
beyond
$ 50,000
$ 290,000
$ - $ 340,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 340,000 $ -
$ - $ 340,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ -
Total $ 340,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total $ 340,000
Funding Sources
Unfunded $ 340,000
Environmental $ -
Construction $ 290,000
Maintenance $ -
Total Budget
Design $ 50,000
Right of Way $ -
Priority Assessment:

Cost and Funding Information
$
If Yes, Assistance Listing
Numbers and/or Grant ID:
$
Date
Estimated Start and Design 7/1/26 - 3/21/27
Construction 4/1/27 - 4/1/28
Select 1
Project Limits:

Are there any existing plans, maps or other supporting documentation for this project? (to be provided upon request)
Project Description: Phase 2 project renovates the Pico Rivera Historical Museum, a History and Heritage landmark of the City.

This phase scope of work includes new ceiling tiles, light fixtures, interior paint, flooring, base moulding, doors, exterior siding and exterior paint.

Project Justification: This project renovates the Pico Rivera Historical Museum with repairs necessary to preserve the building from futher deterioration.

Renovations needed will extend the usable life of the building, preserving this cultural resource.

Project Approval: Established within the 5-year CIP Budget or Date Presented to City Council:

Council Agenda (Attach):

Resolution No. (Attach If Applicable):
(If not presented, provide explanation)
Gene Edwards 4/20/2026
Project Information
Select 1
Public Works

USED BY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Project Number Assigned
Pico Rivera Historical Museum Renovation (Phase 2)
Gene Edwards

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

CIP PROJECT REQUEST FORM
PROJECT NAME:

PROJECT MANAGER:

DEPARTMENT:

NAME OF REQUESTER: DATE:

Project Type: Streets  Traffic
 Bridges  Storm Drain
 Water  Sewer
 Parks  Studies
 Facilities  Other (please explain)
 Non-CIP  CIP
Please provide project parameters (i.e., geographic location) No
End Dates:
 Low - Project can be deferred without significant negative impact(s)  Medium - Project cannot be deferred without some negative impact(s)  High - Project must be implemented due to mandates, public safety concerns, etc.

Cost Estimate: $2,000,000 Ongoing / Maintenance Cost:
per/
Federal/State Grant:  Yes Local Match Fund Amount (if applicable ):
 No Fund deadline:

Reporting and Audit
Requirements:

Project
No.

Carryover
(if applicable)
Proposed
Fiscal Year
1 Proposed
Fiscal Year
2 Proposed
Fiscal Year
3 Proposed
Fiscal Year
4 Proposed
Fiscal Year
5 Proposed
beyond
$ 200,000
$ 80,000
$ 400,000 $ 1,320,000
$ - $ 680,000 $ 1,320,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 680,000 $ 1,320,000
$ - $ 680,000 $ 1,320,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ -
Total $ 2,000,000
$ -
$ -
Total $ 2,000,000
Funding Sources
Unfunded $ 2,000,000
Environmental $ 80,000
Construction $ 1,720,000
Maintenance $ -
Total Budget
Design $ 200,000
Right of Way $ -
Priority Assessment:

Cost and Funding Information
$
If Yes, Assistance Listing
Numbers and/or Grant ID:
$
Date
Project Justification: There is a need for additional Pico Boys ballfields in the City.

Project Approval: Established within the 5-year CIP Budget or Date Presented to City Council:

Council Agenda (Attach):

Resolution No. (Attach If Applicable):
(If not presented, provide explanation)
Estimated Start and Design 8/1/26- 3/31/27
Construction 4/1/27 - 12/31/27
Select 1
Project Limits:

Pico Park, 9528 Beverly Blvd
Are there any existing plans, maps or other supporting documentation for this project? (to be provided upon request)
Project Description: This project constructs two additional ballfields and improvs the one existing, for a total of three (3) Pico Boys ballfields.

Gene Edwards 6/16/2026
Project Information
Select 1

USED BY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Project Number Assigned
Pico Boys Pico Park Ballfield Improvements
Gene Edwards
Public Works

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO

RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, RENEWING GENERAL FUND POLICIES WITH

RESERVE POLICIES FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND THE PICO

RIVERA INNOVATIVE MUNICIPAL ENERGY ENTERPRISE FUND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera (“City Council”) has previously approved and updated General Fund and Proprietary Fund reserve policies as part of the annual budget development and approval process; and WHEREAS, it is prudent to have comprehensive reserve policies which address the maintenance and use of reserves across all operations, including Governmental and Proprietary Funds; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the policies governing the treatment of reserves for the General Fund should be reviewed annually, and this Resolution serves that purpose; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has also determined that it is prudent to establish separate and distinct reserve policies for the Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy Proprietary Fund (i.e., Enterprise Fund) and to review these policies on an annual basis; and
WHEREAS, the General Fund reserve policies incorporate by adoption the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54 – Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions as previously adopted and will be applied to the General Fund. The Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy reserve policies incorporate requirements consistent with sound financial management practices for Proprietary Funds; and
WHEREAS, the reserve policies for the General Fund Commitment for Emergencies/Economic Stabilization Reserve shall be equal to an amount calculated as fifty percent (50%) of the General Fund’s annual operating revenues.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated fully into this Resolution.

SECTION 2. The General Fund Reserve Policies (Exhibit “A”), which comply with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Fund Type Definitions, and the Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy Reserve Policies (Exhibit “B”), which establish reserve requirements consistent with sound financial management practices for Proprietary Funds, collectively support the City of Pico Enclosure 2
4b
RESOLUTION NO. ____

Page 2 of 2 ends

Rivera’s long-term fiscal sustainability by addressing the City’s reserve funding needs and requirements.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this resolution, and it shall thereupon be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AND PASSED this 23rd day of June 2026.

NOES:

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
General Fund Reserve Policies
Fund balance refers to the difference between assets and liabilities in the City’s governmental funds balance sheet. This information is one of the most widely used elements of State and local government financial statements. Financial statement users examine fund balance information to identify the available liquid resources that can be used to pay down unfunded liabilities, finance capital improvements, or enhance the overall financial position of the City.

PURPOSE
The purpose of these policies is to provide guidance on maintaining reasonable levels of reserves in the City’s General Fund. In addition, these policies help improve financial reporting by establishing fund balance classifications that create a hierarchy based on the extent to which the City is bound to observe spending constraints that govern how the City can use amounts reported in the governmental fund balance sheet. These policies will also help guide current and future allocation levels to various reserve categories in the General Fund, setting out specific target amounts based on widely used and accepted best practices.

As referencing governmental funds, this policy satisfies the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54 and incorporates all previous City Council policies regarding GASB Statement No. 54.

POLICY
It is the policy of the City of Pico Rivera to identify the various classifications of the City’s governmental fund balances in its Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR). These classifications take into consideration the City’s long-term infrastructure needs, non-current liabilities, funds necessary to mitigate economic uncertainties, funding that has spending constraints such as grants and fixed assets that will not easily convert to cash. These policies will also increase transparency by clearly designating appropriate reserve levels and categories based on City Council direction and long-term financial planning needs.

The fund balance is a tool the City uses to have an effective long-term financial plan, as well as ensure sufficient liquidity to meet its financial obligations in the short-term.

OBJECTIVES
The City of Pico Rivera’s Reserve Policies have two primary objectives:

1. To determine the available liquid resources; and,

2. To provide the information necessary to make informed financial decisions The fund balance classifications of the City’s General Fund are designed to clarify the extent to which the City is bound to honor constraints on the specific purposes for which amounts in the fund can be spent, rather than to simply represent the financial resources available for appropriation. (QFORVXUH([KLELW$

OVERVIEW
There are three categories of funds per generally accepted accounting principles:
x Governmental Funds: the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds (e.g., State Highway Users Tax), and Capital Projects Funds
x Proprietary Funds: Water Authority Enterprise Fund
x Fiduciary Funds: Successor Agency (i.e., former Redevelopment Agency) The GASB 54 classifications only apply to Governmental Funds. For the City of Pico Rivera, these policies will apply only to the General Fund.

The fund balance is only an approximate measure of liquidity or working capital. Therefore, it is necessary for the City to recognize how fund balance is constituted and isolates funds that are needed for longer-term obligations, discern what funds are restricted for specified purposes, and classify those funds that are not available at all. To accomplish this goal, the City’s financial statements for governmental funds are comprised of five fund balance categories, as spelled out in GASB Statement No. 54:
x Nonspendable Funds
x Restricted Funds
x Committed Funds
x Assigned Funds
x Unassigned Funds

NONSPENDABLE AND RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE
The first two classifications are subject to requirements outside the local governing body’s control for financial decision making and planning purposes. “Nonspendable” resources are essentially irrelevant because, by their nature, they are not liquid (i.e., land or similar non-cash assets). “Restricted” resources are of no discretionary value given the restrictions placed upon them by a third-party outside of the City’s control (i.e., reserve funds required to be set aside by bond documents). Accordingly, this policy will just briefly describe these two classifications.

Nonspendable Funds
Some of the assets that are included in determining the City’s fund balance are inherently nonspendable:
x Assets that will never convert to cash, such as prepaid items and inventories x Assets that will not convert to cash within sixty (60) days from the start of the fiscal year, such as long-term loans receivable, and non-financial assets held for resale x Assets that must be maintained intact pursuant to legal or contractual requirements, such as an endowment
Restricted Funds
Restricted funds describe the portion of the fund balance that is subject to externally enforceable legal restrictions, these restrictions fall into three (3) categories:
(i) Restrictions are imposed by parties altogether outside the scope of the City’s governance:
x Creditors (typically through a debt covenant)
x Grantors (typically State, Federal and other governmental agencies) x Contributors
x Other governments
(ii) Restrictions that arise when the authorization to raise revenues is conditioned upon the revenue being used for a particular purpose:
x Gas taxes must be used for street repair
x Proposition C funds must be used for fixed transit routes x Proposition A funds must be used for transit programs x Measure R must be used for local street repair
(iii) Long-term loans receivable and non-financial assets that are collected can also be considered Restricted if the collected funds are subject to an externally enforceable restriction on how they can be spent.

PROCEDURES
This section provides a comprehensive protocol on what is legally deemed the unrestricted (or spendable) portion of the General Fund balance, and the order in which the classifications are spent.

The unrestricted portion of the fund balance is comprised of the General Fund’s resources classified as “Committed,” “Assigned,” or “Unassigned.”

UNRESTRICTED (SPENDABLE) FUND BALANCE
Committed Funds – Emergency Reserve/Economic Stabilization Reserve Committed funds describe a portion of the fund balance that is constrained by limitations imposed by the Pico Rivera City Council. The City Council imposed limitation must occur no later than the close of the reporting period (i.e., end of the fiscal year) and remains binding unless removed under the same manner. A commitment is made by City Council adoption of a resolution that states the amount and purpose of the commitment. This policy requires the commitment to be made as part of the annual budget adoption process (which typically occurs in June of each year).

This reserve policy establishes a Commitment for Emergencies/Economic Stabilization equal to an amount calculated as fifty percent (50%) of the General Fund’s annual operating revenues.

Appropriations from the Emergency/Economic Stabilization Reserve can only be made by formal City Council action (i.e., resolution appropriating use of these reserve funds).

Generally, appropriations and access to these Committed funds will be reserved for emergency situations.

Examples of such emergencies include, but are not limited to:
x Reduction in revenue equal to or greater than 20% of adopted General Fund revenues in a given fiscal year
x An unplanned, major, catastrophic event such as a natural disaster and/or major emergency requiring expenditures over 10% of General Fund adopted appropriations in a given fiscal year x Unfunded and/or unpredictable State or Federal legislative or judicial mandates x Any other unforeseen event that causes the City to expend funds in excess of 10% of General Fund adopted appropriations in a given fiscal year
Assigned Funds
Assigned funds describe the portion of the General Fund reserves that reflect the use of resources by the Pico Rivera City Council intended to provide a means and source of funding for various near-term and longterm needs. For example, funds can be assigned to address long-term liabilities such as Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) unfunded liabilities and leave accrual liabilities. Funds can also be designated “assigned” to address equipment replacement needs as well as to set-aside funding for unfunded/unprogrammed future capital and/or infrastructure projects.

This policy grants authority to assign funds to the Director of Administrative Services upon City Council approval. Assignment of reserves may be modified by the Director of Administrative Services as part of the annual budget process. Use of assigned funds requires formal action by the City Council to appropriate funds in the appropriate account.

Specifically, this reserve policy establishes assignments for the following short-term and long-term needs, at the various levels specified:
x OPEB (Other Post Employment Benefit) Unfunded Liability x Leave Liability
x Equipment Replacement
x Self-insured Retention
x Bond Refinancing/Reserve
x Capital Improvement (Unfunded/Unprogrammed)
x Deferred Maintenance / Infrastructure Maintenance
x Energy Efficiency Projects
x Economic Sustainability
Additional assignments can and should be made by the Director of Administrative Services to conform to accounting rules and standards, as part of the preparation of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) upon City Council approval. These assignments generally include reserving funds for deposits, debt service and bond defeasance. The ACFR will include a detailed accounting of all GASB Statement No. 54 fund balance classifications, including all Assigned Funds.

OPEB (Other Post Employment Benefit) Unfunded Liability Assignment An assignment will be made that is equal to five percent (5%) of the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) as of June 30 of each year as determined by the GASB 75 valuation report.

Leave Liability
An assignment will be made that is equal to fifty percent (50%) of the amount of Governmental activities compensated absences that are calculated as “due in more than one year” as of June 30 of each year and as reported in the ACFR.

Equipment Replacement
An assignment for equipment replacement needs will be made that is equal to thirtythree percent (33%) of the estimated value of the City’s rolling stock as of June 30 of each year, as recorded in the General Fixed Asset Accounting Group account (900-0000-16300). The purpose of this assignment is to augment the fund balance currently in the Equipment Replacement Fund (fund 170).

This assignment is intended to be utilized for non-routine or extraordinary equipment replacement needs and would include not just rolling stock but other equipment such as computers, network and telecom systems, furniture and related equipment, and other critical citywide “equipment” needs.

Self-Insured Retention
An assignment will be made that is equal to $500,000 and is intended to meet the City’s “self-insured retention” for various insurance needs.

This amount will be re-evaluated and adjusted as necessary.

Bond Refinancing/Reserve
An assignment will be made that is equal to $1,000,000 for the purposes of funding future bond refinancing and/or reserve needs.

The intent of this assignment is to have a reserve set aside that could assist the city in refinancing/refunding any of its current, outstanding bond issuances.

Capital Improvement (Unfunded/Un-programmed)
An assignment will be made that is equal to $2,000,000 for the purposes of providing funding for any unfunded, un-programmed or otherwise un-planned capital improvement projects that required a General Fund funding component.

The purpose of this assignment is to provide an auxiliary means of funding capital improvement projects that do not have a dedicated or restricted funding stream (i.e., non-General Fund source of funding).

The amount of this assignment will be evaluated annually and either decreased or increased based on prior and/or projected fiscal year needs.

Deferred Maintenance / Infrastructure Maintenance
An assignment will be made that is equal to $1,000,000 for the purpose of providing funding for deferred maintenance on the City’s building assets (i.e., City Hall, community centers), sports fields and other related infrastructure items.

The purpose of the Deferred Maintenance/Infrastructure Maintenance assignment is to provide a reserve for deferred maintenance on the City’s buildings (i.e., City Hall, Senior Center, etc.), sports fields (i.e., Smith Park, Pico Park) and other related infrastructure. The Deferred Maintenance assignment could also be utilized to replace items such as gym equipment (i.e., in the Senior Center), banquet tables/chairs and other related items. This assignment could be used to supplement the Equipment Replacement assignment as well as the Equipment Replacement Fund (fund 170) for these types of “one-time” furniture and equipment purchases. The amount of this assignment will be evaluated on a regular basis and either decreased or increased based on updated deferred maintenance needs and priorities.

This assignment is separate and distinct from the “Capital Improvement” assignment, which is intended to fund capital projects related to roads, rights of way and similar areas.

Energy Efficiency Projects
An assignment will be made that is equal to $1,000,000 for the purpose of providing funding for projects that would increase energy efficiency or otherwise decrease energy related costs (i.e., lower utility bills and/or lower maintenance costs).

This assignment would be used to fund capital improvement projects related to energy efficiency such as replacing heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, installation of solar panels, installation of “smart roof” technology and other related projects.

Economic Sustainability
An assignment will be made equal to $1,000,000 to fund economic development sustainability efforts within the City of Pico Rivera. Funds will only be appropriated once formal action by the City Council is taken approving a specific economic development project, mission or other targeted effort aimed at increasing the City’s sales tax and/or property tax revenue.

The Economic Sustainability assignment would establish a pool of funds that could be utilized to improve the City’s sales tax and/or property tax base. Use of these funds would be controlled through a strategic effort that would require a specific, City Council approved plan for how the funds would be utilized.

Unassigned Funds
The General Fund may have net resources in excess of what is classified in one of the four previous categories (non-spendable, restricted, committed or assigned). This amount is presented as the Unassigned Fund Balance amount. The General Fund can o n l y report a positive unassigned fund balance.

However, all other governmental funds can report a negative unassigned fund balance.

This policy dictates that any amount of fund balance will be classified as “unassigned” after funding the Emergency/Economic Stabilization Reserve Commitment plus the various Assigned reserves made in accordance with the preceding section. This policy allows for “unassigned” funds and places no specific restrictions on their use. In general, the City Council could choose to utilize “unassigned” fund balance for one-time projects or uses in a given fiscal year, such as technology upgrades, infrastructure improvements, economic development efforts, paying down long-term liabilities, or other such uses either not allocated for in this policy or in addition to the reserve policies set forth herein.

Use of Resources
In circumstances when an expenditure is made for a purpose for which amounts are available in multiple fund balance classifications, the order of allocation of these available funds is first restricted, second committed, third assigned and lastly unassigned amounts.

REPLENISHMENT OF COMMITTED AND/OR ASSIGNED RESERVES
In keeping with the principles discussed in this policy, when either Committed or Assigned funds are utilized for their specific, intended purposes, or the levels fall below the policy levels as described and set forth herein, the City Council will develop a reserve replenishment plan to return the various reserves to their policy levels. This plan will seek to return the Committed and/or Assigned reserves to their policy levels within one (1) to three (3) years, per City Council direction. Furthermore, Unassigned funds will be first utilized to maintain and/or return the Committed and/or Assigned reserves to their policy levels.

ECONOMIC TRIGGERS
In order to maintain a long-term, structurally balanced budget, staff shall perform a periodic analysis of Core Revenues, as well as ongoing pension obligations, beginning with the first month of the fiscal year. The following alternatives/options can be used separately or in aggregate to assess reduction in core revenues or increases in pension obligations.

Reduction in Core Revenues or Increases in CalPERS Contributions:
– If the total Sales Tax Revenues for any quarter of the fiscal year falls below 10% of the amounts for the same quarter of the prior fiscal year, net of any known or expected losses; – If the total Core Revenues for any month or in aggregate fall to a level 5% below (either budget projections OR the same period of the prior year);
– If total General Fund Revenues, net of transfers and one-time revenues fall below 3% (this will be determined based on historical budget/actuals);
– If the total CalPERS Pension Contributions reported in October of each year come in 10% greater than anticipated in prior reports;
Should any of the above mentioned items occur, staff will prepare a plan for City Council consideration to ensure a structurally balanced budget, including, but not limited to:
– An assessment of city programs and core services;
– An assessment of all contractual obligations and multi-year agreements; – A reduction in the workforce;

SUMMARY
Components of Fund Balance
x Nonspendable Fund Balance
o Inherently nonspendable
o Portion of net resources that cannot be spent because of their form o Portion of net resources that cannot be spent because they must be maintained intact x Restricted Fund Balance
o Externally enforceable limits on use
o Limitations imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws and regulations of other governments
o Limitations imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation x Committed Fund Balance
o Council/Agency self-imposed limitations set in place prior to the end of the fiscal year o Limitation imposed at the highest level of decision making that requires formal action at the same level to remove
x Assigned Fund Balance
o Limitation resulting from intended use
o Intended use established by Director of Administrative Services x Unassigned Fund Balance
o Total fund balance in the General Fund in excess of nonspendable, restricted, committed and assigned fund balance (surplus)
o Excess of nonspendable, restricted, and committed fund balance over total fund balance (deficit)
x Use of Fund Balance
o Restricted
o Committed
o Assigned

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Proprietary (Enterprise) Fund Reserve Policies
Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME)
Fund balance refers to the difference between assets and liabilities in the City’s governmental funds balance sheet. This information is one of the most widely used elements of State and local government financial statements. Financial statement users examine fund balance information to identify the available liquid resources that can be used to pay down unfunded liabilities, finance capital improvements, or enhance the overall financial position of the City.

PURPOSE
The purpose of these policies is to provide guidance on maintaining reasonable levels of reserves in the City’s Enterprise Fund established to record activities related to Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME). The City of Pico Rivera approved establishment of a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) energy procurement and provider program. This CCA program is established through a hybrid joint powers authority agreement with California Choice Energy Authority (CCEA) and will be known as “Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy” (PRIME).

It is necessary to establish reserve policies separate from the City’s General Fund policies that address the specific and unique operational needs of the CCA. These policies will also help guide current and future allocation levels to various reserve categories in the PRIME Enterprise Fund (Fund 560), setting out specific target amounts to provide financial stability during market downturns and improve liquidity, which is crucial for procuring energy at competitive rates. Such financial strategies are designed to maintain low and stable rates for customers as a long-term objective.

It is understood that these policies will be revisited annually as part of the budget development process and will be updated accordingly.

POLICY
It is the policy of the City of Pico Rivera to identify the various classifications of the City’s governmental fund balances in its Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR). These classifications take into consideration the City’s long-term infrastructure needs, non-current liabilities, funds necessary to mitigate economic uncertainties, funding that has spending constraints such as grants, and fixed assets that will not easily convert to cash. These policies will also increase transparency by clearly designating appropriate reserve levels and categories based on City Council direction and long-term financial planning needs.

OBJECTIVES
The City of Pico Rivera’s PRIME Reserve Policies have two primary objectives:

1. To determine the available liquid resources; and

2. To provide the information necessary to make informed financial decisions The fund balance classifications and reserve categories of the City’s PRIME fund are designed to clarify the extent to which certain amounts should be set aside to account for potential changes in the energy market, unforeseen capital needs, or other expenses not anticipated with this operation, and to establish strong capital and liquidity positions.
(QFORVXUH([KLELW%
PRIME is anticipated to achieve financial sustainability. Consequently, these policies will be updated as new information becomes available, warranting adjustments.

OVERVIEW
There are three categories of funds per generally accepted accounting principles:
x Governmental Funds: the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds (e.g., State Highway Users Tax), and Capital Projects Funds
x Proprietary Funds: PRIME CCA Fund, Water Authority Enterprise Fund x Fiduciary Funds: Successor Agency (i.e., former Redevelopment Agency) The specific GASB 54 classifications only apply to Governmental Funds. However, the City of Pico Rivera’s PRIME Reserve Policies will be guided by the intent of GASB 54 and will utilize similar language in denoting the reserve “buckets” described below and adopted per this policy.

The fund balance is only an approximate measure of liquidity or working capital. Therefore, it is necessary for the City to recognize how fund balance is constituted and isolates funds that are needed for longer-term obligations, discern what funds are restricted for specified purposes, and classify those funds that are not available at all. To accomplish this goal, the City’s financial statements are comprised of five fund balance categories, as spelled out in GASB Statement No. 54:
x Nonspendable Funds
x Restricted Funds
x Committed Funds
x Assigned Funds
x Unassigned Funds
The PRIME reserve policies will utilize this nomenclature to denote the various reserves necessary for the successful operation of the CCA.

Accordingly, this policy will just briefly describe these two classifications. It is also understood that the functions of the PRIME CCA may render these categories (Nonspendable and Restricted) unnecessary.

However, they are being included in order to provide the flexibility to utilize them should PRIME’s operations deem them necessary.

Nonspendable Funds
Some of the assets that are included in determining PRIME’s fund balance are inherently nonspendable:
x Assets that will never convert to cash, such as prepaid items and inventories x Assets that will not convert to cash within sixty (60) days from the start of the fiscal year, such as long-term loans receivable, and non-financial assets held for resale x Assets that must be maintained intact pursuant to legal or contractual requirements, such as an endowment
Restricted Funds
Restricted funds describe the portion of the fund balance that is subject to externally enforceable legal restrictions, these restrictions fall into three (3) categories:
i. Restrictions are imposed by parties altogether outside the scope of the City’s governance:
a. Creditors (typically through a debt covenant)
b. Grantors (typically State, Federal and other governmental agencies) c. Contributors
d. Other governments
ii. Restrictions that arise when the authorization to raise revenues is conditioned upon the revenue being used for a particular purpose
iii. Long-term loans receivable and non-financial assets that are collected can also be considered Restricted if the collected funds are subject to an externally enforceable restriction on how they can be spent.

Neither of these categories may be necessary nor will be utilized. However, in order to promote prudent financial decisions, these categories are being included in the PRIME reserve policies should the need arise to utilize them given the unique nature of this CCA’s operations.

Procedures
This section provides a comprehensive protocol on what is deemed the unrestricted (or spendable) portion of the PRIME Enterprise Fund’s fund balance, and the order in which the classifications are spent.

The unrestricted portion of the fund balance is comprised of PRIME’s resources classified as “Committed,” “Assigned,” or “Unassigned.” The reserve “buckets” established below are meant to set aside an accumulation of reserves that could be utilized in the event of rate changes, infrastructure needs or other uses. It is understood that these reserve categories will be re-visited and adjusted as necessary as PRIME’s annual operations become more clear and predictable.

These reserve policies are meant to address City Council’s desire to establish prudent financial plans that place PRIME on solid financial footing and allow this Enterprise function to respond to unforeseen capital and funding needs if necessary.

UNRESTRICTED (SPENDABLE) FUND BALANCE
Funding Priorities (Waterfall)
Each of the commitments and assignments will have funding goals expressed as a percentage of anticipated revenue. There will be a hierarchy for funding each reserve category. That is, once all ongoing operational needs are met, any positive net position (i.e., surplus) will be committed as follows:
x First to the Rate Stabilization reserve (commitment) until the twenty percent (20%) goal is met; x Second to the Research and Development reserve (commitment) until the fifteen percent (15%) goal is met;
x Third to the Strategic Infrastructure Investment reserve (commitment) until the fifteen percent (15%) goal is met;
x Fourth to the Cash Flow/Cash Advance reserve (assignment) until the ten percent (10%) goal is met; and
x Fifth and finally to the Economic Uncertainty reserve (assignment) until the ten percent (10%) goal is met.

This “waterfall” of positive net position will continue in each fiscal year until the minimum percentage funding goals are met. Once each of the reserve categories has reached the stated percentage goals, any remaining positive net position will be classified as “unassigned.” Committed Funds
Committed funds describe a portion of the fund balance that is constrained by limitations imposed by the Pico Rivera City Council. The City Council imposed limitation must occur no later than the close of the reporting period (i.e., end of the fiscal year) and remains binding unless removed under the same manner. A commitment is made by City Council adoption of a resolution that states the amount and purpose of the commitment. This policy requires the commitment to be made as part of the annual budget adoption process (which typically occurs in June of each year).

Rate Stabilization Reserve (Commitment)
This reserve policy establishes a Commitment for Rate Stabilization equal to an amount calculated as t w e n t y pe rc ent (20%) of t h e p r i o r f i s c a l y e a r ’ s annual operating revenues of the Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Enterprise Fund.

PRIME is committed to offering competitive pricing to its customers. However, the energy market, by its very nature, is volatile. While rates will be set annually by the Pico Rivera City Council based on energy procurement costs and SCE rate forecasts, it is possible that external market forces may create fluctuations in energy procurement costs or SCE rates. Still, the City is committed to providing stable and predictable energy pricing to its customers. Hence, it is necessary to establish a reserve that would allow PRIME to respond to potential higher energy procurement costs or SCE rate changes without having to raise rates outside of the regular, annual rate setting process.

This commitment would be established to allow PRIME to pay for energy costs should they increase beyond the ability of the set rates to pay for the contracted energy costs. This reserve would only be utilized should PRIME’s regular rate revenue be insufficient to cover the costs of energy procurement. Any such increases would then be addressed through the annual rate setting process, but this reserve would allow PRIME to continue providing energy at set and predictable rates.

Research and Development Reserve (Commitment)
This reserve policy establishes a Commitment for Research and Development equal to an amount calculated as fifteen percent (15%) of the prior fiscal year’s annual operating revenues of the Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Enterprise Fund.

Pico Rivera has long been at the forefront of creating new, sustainable approaches to modern living. The City has been proactively promoting power alternatives, resource conservation and smart energy consumption of all its natural resources for many years. However, investment in research and development are required to plant the seeds for the technologies, products, and services of tomorrow.

PRIME is dedicated to designing cleaner energy platforms for its customers in an effort to promote an environmentally sustainable future.

This commitment would be established to provide a capital funding source for any future customer programs and/or services that the City Council may elect to research and develop. There is a tremendous need in our community to stimulate and invest in distributed energy resource development that increases grid reliability and promotes environmental sustainability. Programmatic research and development funding may be used for initiatives such as demand response rebate programs or energy efficiency services.

Strategic Infrastructure Investment Reserve (Commitment) This reserve policy establishes a Commitment for Strategic Infrastructure Investment equal to an amount calculated as fifteen percent (15%) of the prior fiscal year’s operating revenues of the Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Enterprise Fund.

This commitment would be established to provide capital funding for any future infrastructure projects that would allow PRIME to increase the amount and/or type of energy provided. For example, PRIME could partner with Lancaster Choice Energy (LCE) to build a solar power generating plant.

Appropriations from the Rate Stabilization, Research and Development, and Strategic Infrastructure Investment commitments can only be made by formal City Council action (i.e., resolution appropriating use of these reserve funds).

Assigned Funds
Assigned funds describe the portion of the PRIME Enterprise Fund reserves that reflect the use of resources intended to provide a means and source of funding for various near-term and long-term needs.

This policy grants authority to assign funds to the Director of Administrative Services. Assignment of reserves may be modified by the Director of Administrative Services as part of the annual budget process.

Use of assigned funds requires formal action by the City Council to appropriate funds in the appropriate account.

Specifically, this reserve policy establishes assignments for the following short-term and long-term needs, at the various levels specified:
x Cash Flow/Cash Advance Reserve (10% of revenue)
x Economic Uncertainty Reserve (10% of revenue)
Additional assignments can and will be made by the Director of Administrative Services as part of the preparation of the annual budget.

Cash Flow/Cash Advance (Assignment)
An assignment will be created that is equal to ten percent (10%) of the prior fiscal year’s revenue of the Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Enterprise Fund.

Generally, appropriations and access to these Assigned funds will be reserved for situations where, due to cash flow timing issues, it is necessary to find sources of non-operating revenue in order to pay for operational needs of PRIME. This Assignment is to be utilized only in extreme circumstances where normal cash flow does not allow for payment of ongoing operating costs from operating revenue.

Economic Uncertainty Reserve (Assignment)
An assignment fund will be created that is equal to ten percent (10%) of the prior fiscal year’s revenue of the Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Enterprise Fund.

Generally, appropriations and access to these Assigned funds will be reserved for emergency situations.

Examples of such emergencies include, but are not limited to:
x Reduction in revenue equal to or greater than 20% of adopted PRIME Enterprise Funds revenues in a given fiscal year
x An unplanned, major, catastrophic event such as a natural disaster requiring expenditures over 10% of PRIME Enterprise Fund adopted appropriations in a given fiscal year x Unfunded and/or unpredictable State or Federal legislative or judicial mandates x Any other unforeseen event that causes the City to expend funds in excess of 5% of PRIME Enterprise Fund adopted appropriations in a given fiscal year Unassigned Funds
The PRIME Enterprise Fund may have net resources in excess of what is classified in one of the Commitments or Assignments described above. This amount is presented as the Unassigned Fund Balance amount.

This policy dictates that any amount of fund balance will be classified as “unassigned” after funding the various Committed and Assigned reserves made in accordance with the preceding sections. This policy allows for “unassigned” funds and places no specific restrictions on their use; except that these funds be maintained and used for the purpose of the enterprise itself, but must be appropriated by formal City Council action for use.

Replenishment of Committed and/or Assigned Reserves
In keeping with the principles discussed in this policy, when either Committed or Assigned funds are utilized for their specific, intended purposes, or the levels fall below the policy levels as described and set forth herein, the City Council will develop a reserve replenishment plan to return the various reserves to their policy levels. This plan will seek to return the Committed and/or Assigned reserves to their policy levels within one (1) to three (3) years, per City Council direction. Furthermore, unassigned funds will be first utilized to maintain and/or return the Committed and/or Assigned reserves to their policy levels.

Enclosure 3
Fund Object Code Description Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 100 41102 Business License - Legal Matters 20,000
100 56910 Legal Services 20,000
$ - $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000
Fund Object Code Description Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 221 54100 Special Departmental Expenses 54,532
550 53315 Plant Maintenance and Repair 60,000
550 54500 Contracted Services 60,000
- - 114,532 60,000
$ - $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000
$ - $ - $ 114,532 $ 60,000

SUBTOTAL- OTHER FUND PROPOSED CHANGES FOR ADOPTION

TOTAL - PROPOSED CHANGES FOR ADOPTION - OTHER FUNDS
Enclosure 3 - Summary of Proposed Changes

GENERAL FUND PROPOSED CHANGES

SUBTOTAL- GENERAL FUND PROPOSED CHANGES FOR ADOPTION

OTHER FUNDS PROPOSED CHANGES

TOTAL - PROPOSED CHANGES FOR ADOPTION - GENERAL FUND
Revenue Expenditure
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget Adoption

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
June 23, 2026
FY 2026-27
Revenue Expenditure
4c
To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Meeting Date: June 23, 2026
Subject: RESOLUTION UPDATING JOB DESCRIPTION FOR THE FULLTIME SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER FOR THE

HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION
Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution updating job description for the full-time Senior Human Resources Manager in the Human Resources Division of the Administration Department.

Strategic Priority:
1 - Fiscal & Organizational Sustainability - Create a City government build to adapt to change.

Strategy:

1.5 Develop, retain, and acquire an effective team within the city.

Fiscal Impact:

Sufficient funding has been appropriated for this position in the fiscal year (FY) 2026-27 Adopted Budget. No additional funding is needed.

Background:

Job descriptions are essential to recruitment, training, and development of the workforce as they identify employees’ tasks and responsibilities, as well as how they directly support the organization’s vision and goals. As part of the Human Resources Strategic Plan for organizational sustainability, staff have developed a plan to update the City’s job descriptions to reflect the changing duties affected by enhanced technologies, priority initiatives, elimination of redundancy, etc. In addition, some of these job descriptions necessitate specific details about tasks and required experience.

Back to Outline 5
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026

RESOLUTION UPDATING JOB DESCRIPTION FOR THE FULL-TIME THE SENIOR

HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER FOR THE HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION

Page 2 of 2 ends

Discussion:

The City of Pico Rivera (City) recognizes that the roles and abilities of employees have adapted to advancements in technology and the shift towards shared responsibilities.

Moreover, revising the job descriptions to accurately reflect the work being done, and the true responsibilities of the position, may help identify gaps or overlap in the workforce. A current, accurate job description is an excellent tool for managers and City hierarchy to use as a guide for discussions with employees about performance excellence, deficiencies, needs for skills development, teamwork, organizational changes and/or career progress.

It is also a transparency tool used to describe responsibilities and duties to potential applicants and future employees. The use of updated, descriptive, and accurate job descriptions and titles is crucial in advertising job openings and conducting market studies to ensure that staff are recruited for the workforce demands of the City.

As a result, staff have been working diligently and systematically on reviewing job descriptions, particularly for vacant positions that require recruitment and updating them according to the specific needs of each department. We have accomplished this by working closely with each department and to better understand the needs of the department, as it pertains to each of these roles. Additionally, we have conducted studies of like positions throughout cities and reviewed and compared their current job descriptions to those we are developing and updating. We have also worked closely with the City bargaining groups to ensure their input and alignment in the revision of the job description.

The job description for the full-time Senior Human Resources Manager has been updated to better reflect the distinct nature of inquiries handled and the types of plans reviewed within each department. These changes provide a clearer distinction between the positions by outlining the specific duties related to the Human Resources Division. Moving forward, staff will continue to review and collaborate with individual departments to tailor each position classification based on the relevant role, title, specialization, and expectations of the position.

Conclusion:

Staff recommend that the City Council approve a resolution (Enclosure 1) updating the job description (Exhibit A) for the full-time Senior Human Resources Manager position. The salary schedule (Exhibit B) for this position will remain the same and there are no changes to the budgeted salaries and benefits of these positions.

Steve Carmona
SC:AG:sp
Enclosure: 1) Resolution/Exhibit A and B
RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO

RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, UPDATING JOB DESCRIPTION FOR THE

FULL-TIME SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER POSITION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera seeks to revise existing job description for the full-time Senior Human Resources Manager position; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to define and establish the terms and conditions of employment applicable to the full-time Senior Human Resources Manager position; and WHEREAS, this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect until superseded by a subsequent resolution concerning this matter.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera as follows:

SECTION 1. The job description for the position of “Full-Time Senior Human Resources Manager” as reviewed and approved by Human Resources and the members of the Pico Rivera Mid Managers and Professional & Confidential Employee Association (CEA) as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto is hereby revised and adopted.

SECTION 2. The Salary Schedule for the “Full-Time Senior Human Resources Manager” classifications is set forth in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. The City Council reserves the right and discretion to review and amend this Resolution as it deems necessary.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this resolution, and it shall thereupon be in full force effect.

APPROVED AND PASSED this 23rd day of June, 2026.
____________________________
Gustavo V. Camacho, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________ _______________________________ Cynthia Ayala, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney AYES:

NOES:
5a
RESOLUTION NO.

Page 2 of 8 ends

EXHIBIT “A”

SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER

GENERAL PURPOSE
Under general direction of the Assistant City Manager, the Senior Human Resources Manager plans, organizes, directs, and supervises the operations of the Human Resources Department. The position performs highly responsible professional, administrative, and supervisory duties in the areas of recruitment and selection, classification and compensation, employee and labor relations, benefits administration, leaves management, training and development, workers’ compensation, and policy development. This classification performs complex analysis, provides guidance to management staff, and ensures compliance with federal, state, and local employment laws.

EXAMPLES OF ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS
The duties listed below are intended only as illustrations of the various types of work that may be performed by employees in this classification. Functions may be added, modified or deleted to meet the needs of the City.

Leadership and Management
• Develops and implements departmental goals, objectives, policies, and procedures.
• Plans, coordinates, and directs daily operations of the Human Resources Department.
• Supervises, trains, evaluates, and provides guidance to HR staff. • Formulate budgetary and cost estimates associated with various programs and services.

Recruitment & Selection
• Manages full-cycle recruitment processes, including job analysis, testing, interviewing, and onboarding. Ensures recruitment strategies reflect best practices and diversity, equity, and inclusion principles.

Employee & Labor Relations
• Advises management on employee performance, corrective action, and disciplinary procedures.
• Interprets MOUs and provides support with grievance management. • Participates in labor relations activities.

RESOLUTION NO.

Page 3 of 8 ends

Benefits, Leaves & Workers’ Compensation
• Oversees benefits administration, including medical, dental, vision, retirement, and ancillary benefits.
• Oversees the administration of mandated and non-mandated leave programs (FMLA, CFRA, PDL, ADA/FEHA).
• Oversees the coordination of workers’ compensation claims, return‑to‑work, and modified duty processes.

Training & Organizational Development
• Plans and implements training programs and employee development initiatives. • Supports leadership development and organizational improvement strategies.

Compliance, Policy & Risk Management Support
• Ensures compliance with federal, state, and local employment laws. • Develops, updates, and interprets HR policies and procedures. • Ensures Risk Management best practices are in place for safety and liabilityrelated matters.

Classification & Compensation
• Oversees the City’s classification and compensation plan. • Conducts salary surveys and provides recommendations to maintain internal equity and market competitiveness.

Administrative & Strategic Responsibilities
• Prepares reports, presentations, correspondence, and recommendations for executive leadership and City Council.
• Oversees HRIS processes and maintains accurate personnel records. • Leads special studies, audits, and organizational development initiatives. • Perform analyses, collect data, prepare reports, and make presentations to executive management, commissions, and other bodies.
• Prepare and review bids and specifications; recommend, select and oversee contractors.
• Coordinate projects, programs and staff with other departments and outside agencies.
• Represent the City in the community and at professional meetings, as required. • Serve in an acting capacity for higher-level officials when assigned.

RESOLUTION NO.

Page 4 of 8 ends

QUALIFICATIONS GUIDELINES
Knowledge of:
• Principles and practices of public‑sector human resources management. • Recruitment, selection, classification, and compensation practices. • Employee relations and labor relations principles.
• Benefits, leaves, and workers’ compensation administration. • Applicable federal, state, and local employment laws, including but not limited to the Meyers‑Milias‑Brown Act (MMBA), FMLA/CFRA/PDL, ADA/FEHA, and workers’ compensation regulations.
• CalPERS retirement system.
• HRIS systems and data management.
• Occupational hazards and OSHA standards.
• Purchasing procedures and practices.
• Principles and practices of public administration, including knowledge of government organizations and operations.
• leadership techniques and execution of business functions to meet organizational goals and objectives and evaluate accomplishments.

Skills/Ability to:
• Review complex organizational and administrative problems, evaluate alternatives, and recommend and implement effective courses of action. • Plan, direct, organize, coordinate, and control departmental activities and major HR program areas.
• Manage, supervise, train, coach, and evaluate the work of staff; initiate and complete performance evaluations; and provide constructive, timely, and legally compliant feedback.
• Communicate clearly, concisely, and professionally, both orally and in writing; prepare comprehensive reports, analyses, correspondence, and public presentations.
• Properly explain, interpret, analyze, apply, and make decisions in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, policies, administrative procedures, and Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs).
• Interpret and ensure compliance with federal, state, and local employment laws, including but not limited to the Meyers‑Milias‑Brown Act (MMBA), FMLA/CFRA/PDL, ADA/FEHA, and workers’ compensation regulations. • Demonstrate strong interpersonal skills; maintain effective, collaborative working relationships with employees, managers, union representatives, and external stakeholders.
• Use conflict‑resolution techniques, mediation approaches, and facilitation skills to address employee or labor relations matters in a professional and constructive manner.
• Analyze and solve complex problems; research and interpret data, standards, policies, regulations, and best practices.

RESOLUTION NO.

Page 5 of 8 ends

• Organize, prioritize, and coordinate multiple tasks, assignments, projects, and deadlines in a fast‑paced environment.
• Delegate tasks and manage projects from initiation through completion, ensuring accountability and quality control.
• Represent the City professionally at meetings, negotiations, functions, and public speaking engagements.
• Follow oral and written instructions; work independently with minimal supervision and a high level of judgment and discretion.
• Maintain confidentiality of sensitive or non‑public records and information. • Interview, hire, onboard, and train employees in alignment with City policies and best practices.
• Demonstrate strong leadership skills; model ethical behavior, sound decision‑making, and professional conduct.
• Recommend and implement disciplinary actions consistent with due process requirements and established policies.
• Assist with the preparation, administration, monitoring, and control of departmental budgets.
• Respond effectively in urgent or emergency situations, applying sound judgment under pressure.
• Conduct studies, prepare analyses, evaluate operational practices, and accurately estimate project costs.

Education/Training/Experience
Education:

Bachelor’s Degree in Human Resources, Business, Public Administration, or a closely related field is required.

Experience:
• 8 years of progressively responsible human resources experience, including 3 years of managerial experience, involving professional and technical-level duties in areas such as recruitment and selection, classification and compensation, benefits, labor relations, leave administration, or risk management is required. • 5 years of related analytical and administrative experience to duties is required. • Municipal/Government leadership experience is required. • Government board/City Council experience desirable.

Licenses/Certification:

Valid California Class C Driver’s License and an acceptable driving record is required.

RESOLUTION NO.

Page 6 of 8 ends

PHYSICAL AND MENTAL DEMANDS
The physical and mental demands described here are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfully perform the essential functions of this class.

Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.

Physical Demands
While performing the duties of this class, the employee is regularly required to sit; talk or hear, in person and by telephone; use hands to finger, handle, feel or operate standard office equipment; and reach with hands or arms. The employee occasionally walks and stands and lifts and moves records and documents weighing 20 pounds or less.

Specific vision abilities required by this job include close vision, color vision, depth perception and the ability to adjust focus.

Mental Demands
While performing the duties of this class, the employee is regularly required to use oral and written communication skills; read and interpret data, information and documents; analyze and solve problems; observe and interpret data and situations; use math and mathematical reasoning; learn and apply new skills or information; perform highly detailed work on multiple concurrent tasks; work under changing and intensive deadlines with frequent interruptions; and interact with City officials, media, citizens groups, employees and others encountered in the course of work.

Occasionally required to deal with dissatisfied or quarrelsome individuals.

WORK ENVIRONMENT
The employee works under typical office conditions, and the noise level is moderately quiet.

The work environment characteristics described here are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.

RESOLUTION NO.

Page 7 of 8 ends

Class specifications are only intended to present a descriptive summary of the range of duties and responsibilities that are associated with specified positions. Therefore, specifications may not include all duties performed by individuals within a classification and may be requested to perform job-related responsibilities and tasks other than those stated in this specification. In addition, specifications are intended to outline the minimum qualifications necessary for entry into the class and do not necessarily convey the qualifications of incumbents within the position.

RESOLUTION NO.

Page 8 of 8 ends

EXHIBIT “B”
Salary Schedule
FY 2026-2027
CLASSIFICATION Minimum Middle Maximum
Senior Human Resources
Manager
$11,446 $12,361 $13,274
To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Meeting Date: June 23, 2026
Subject: CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ADOPTION Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution adopting the Engineering and Traffic Survey recommendations regarding speed limits along the City of Pico Rivera’s street segments, as described in said resolution.

Strategic Priority:
3 - Infrastructure - Plan, fund, build, and maintain reliable and cost-effective infrastructure that contributes to enhancing quality of life.

Strategy:

3.1 Prepare and update master plans to ensure up-to-date planning, innovative practices, sustainable methods, and future technology are considered for all infrastructure projects.

Fiscal Impact:

The fiscal year (FY) 2025-26 Adopted Budget includes $50,000 in Prop C funds (Fund 206) in Account No. 206.70.7300.54500-NonCIP30064 for the preparation of the Engineering and Traffic Survey. The traffic survey and job costing for staff overseeing the work will be completed at an approximate cost of $25,000. The unused balance will be made available for future capital projects. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

Discussion:

As required per the California Vehicle Code (CVC) 627, an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) is intended to serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Pico Rivera (City). The data from the survey is required to support and/or establish speed limits on city streets. Speed limits are established primarily for protecting the public from the behavior of reckless, unreliable, or dangerous drivers. Speed limits are generally established at or near the 85th percentile Back to Outline 6
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026

CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ADOPTION

Page 2 of 3 ends

speed. The 85th percentile speed, also referred to as the critical speed, is defined as the speed at or below which 85% of traffic is moving in free flow conditions. Speed limits established on this basis conform to the consensus of those who drive on the roadways as to what speed is reasonable and safe under normal driving conditions.

The E&TS is required to enable the Sheriff’s Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 requires an E&TS verify the prima facie speed limit to lawfully use electronic speed measurement devices from limits established under CVC 22352, 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3. Per the CVC 40802, the prima facie speed limit must be justified by a speed survey:

1. Every five (5) years; or

2. Can be extended to every seven (7) years; or

3. Every 14 years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width or traffic volume.

This section does not apply to local streets, roads or school zones which have been set at the prima facie speed limit. The current speed survey was last conducted and adopted in 2019 and is due to expire in 2026.

In January 2026, the City authorized the preparation of an E&TS by Willdan, the City’s On-Call Traffic Engineer. The study was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC and following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Data collected as part of the E&TS include traffic volumes, speed data and accident collision rates.

The E&TS studied a total of 44 roadway segments within the City, identified as either a major arterial, secondary arterial or collector street in the City’s General Plan. Elements studied in the E&TS, per the CVC, include measurement of prevailing speed, accident history and roadway characteristics not readily apparent to motorist.

Based on the data collected as part of the survey (Exhibit A) staff recommend no changes to the existing posted speed limits. The speed limits will need to be recertified per the CVC; therefore, staff recommend approval of a resolution (Enclosure 1) to reestablish speed limits along the 44 roadway segments studied within the City.

Conclusion:

The Engineering & Traffic Survey was prepared in accordance with the California Vehicle Code and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to serve as the foundation for setting and enforcing speed limits on designated streets within the City of Pico Rivera.

Staff recommend retaining the current posted speed limits, as supported by the report’s CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026

CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ADOPTION

Page 3 of 3 ends

findings, and approval a resolution to renew speed limits along the 44 studied roadway segments within the City. This action will ensure continued compliance with California Vehicle Code requirements, maintain the validity of radar enforcement, and promote consistent, data‑driven speed management that supports roadway safety and efficient traffic operations.

Steve Carmona
SC:NN:KG:np
Enclosure(s): 1) Resolution/Exhibit A
2)Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ENGINEERING

AND TRAFFIC SURVEY DESIGNATING SPEED LIMITS FOR CERTAIN

CITY STREETS
WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 40802 (Speed Traps) designates that a section of a highway or street is considered a “speed trap” if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) performed within a specific time period, and the enforcement of the speed limit involved the use of radar or any other electronic device for measuring the speed of moving objects. The prima facie speed limits on various streets of the City of Pico Rivera must be determined and established on the basis of an E&TS. Conducting an E&TS for establishing speed limits is governed by the CVC and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Since an E&TS is valid for a period of 5, 7 or 14 years the City must update the E&TS for existing speed zones prior to their expiration date. Additionally, the City is required to re-evaluate the speed limits on segments of the roadways that have undergone significant changes in roadway characteristics or surrounding land use; and WHEREAS, the E&TS justifying the proposed speed limits were performed in accordance with the provisions of Title 10.28.060 of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code, the CVC, CAMUTCD and established traffic engineering practices; and WHEREAS, based on the information presented in Section 2, the City Council finds it appropriate to designate speed limits for 44 street segments; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to adopt a resolution to re-establish speed limits on 44 segments; and
WHEREAS, the designated prima facie speed limits are based on the results of the E&TS; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Pico Rivera, hereby determines pursuant to Section 10.28.060 of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code and Section 627 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California, that the public health, safety and welfare will be best protected by establishing specified speed limits on certain streets and installing certain additional traffic control measures as described hereinafter and shown in Section 2.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Pico Rivera does hereby approve and authorize the Director of Public Works to implement the following prima facie speed limits based upon an E&TS conducted in February 2026 that are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and to be reasonably safe:

Enclosure 1
6a
RESOLUTION NO. ______

Page 2 of 2 ends

• Exhibit A presents a summary of the 44 locations surveyed and the subsequent speed posting recommendations.

SECTION 3. Exhibit A is hereby approved and incorporated into and is part of this Resolution and shall become effective upon the approval of this Resolution and the posting of any required signage.

SECTION 4. In the event that any portion of this Resolution is deemed invalid or is unenforceable, such provision shall be severable from the remainder and that the remainder of the Resolution shall be given full force and effect.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this resolution, and it shall thereupon be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AND PASSED this 23rd day of June, 2026.
_______________________________
Gustavo V. Camacho, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ _________________________________ Cynthia Ayala, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney AYES:

NOES:

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed limits
Crash Posted Rec.

Dist. Rate*** Speed 85% 10 mi. %in Speed
No. Street From To (mi.) ADT Exp. Act. Limit Speed Pace Pace Limit Justification 1 Beverly Blvd WCL(200' E/O Rosemead Blvd 0.68 40,637 1.23 0.33 40 42 34-43 66% 40 Closest to 85th Speed Rea Dr)
2 Beverly Blvd Rosemead Blvd ECL (290' W /0 1.1 36,577 1.23 0.27 40** 42 33-42 62% 40** Closest to 85th Speed Pioneer Blvd)
3 Beverly Rd WCL (Culp Dr) Rosemead Blvd 0.7 5,960 1.68 0.22 35** 37 28-37 76% 35** Closest to 85th Speed 4 Beverly Rd Rosemead Blvd San Gabriel River 0.64 4,716 1.68 0.00 35 39 29-38 72% 35 Round Down 85th Speed Pkwy
5 Durfee Ave Whittier Blvd Beverly Rd 0.67 11,479 1.68 0.12 25** 32 22-31 76% 25** Special Condition* 6 Durfee Ave Beverly Rd Gallatin Rd 0.48 5,569 1.68 0.34 25** 30 22-31 83% 25** Special Condition* 7 Durfee Ave Gallatin Rd Kruse Rd 0.31 5,160 1.68 0.00 25 31 21-30 74% 25 Special Condition* 8 Fairway Dr Cypress Point Bradgate Dr 0.35 1,098 1.68 0.00 25 33 22-31 70% 25 Special Condition* 9 Gallatin Rd Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 0.35 10,300 1.68 0.00 30 34 25-34 67% 30 Round Down 85th Speed 10 Jackson St Whittier Blvd Passons Blvd 0.14 4,228 1.68 0.00 NP 27 18-27 74% 25 Closest to 85th Speed * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification ** 25 mph when children are present
D Recommended Speed Limit Reduction D Recommended Speed Limit Increase *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 19

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed limits
Crash Posted Rec.

Dist. Rate*** Speed 85% 10 mi. %in Speed
No. Street From To (mi.) ADT Exp. Act. Limit Speed Pace Pace Limit Justification 11 Kruse Rd Narrows Dr Durfee Ave 0.43 1,773 1.68 1.20 25 29 19-28 77% 25 Round Down 85th Speed 12 Loch Lomond Dr Van Norman Rd Paramount Blvd 0.39 2,029 1.68 0.00 25 33 23-32 64% 25 Special Condition* 13 Mines Ave Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 0.34 2,642 1.68 0.00 35 39 30-39 74% 35 Round Down 85th Speed 14 Mines Ave Rosemead Blvd Passons Blvd 0.41 5,412 1.68 0.00 30** 37 24-33 63% 30** Special Condition* 15 Mines Ave Passons Blvd Rimbank Ave 0.32 409 1.68 0.00 25 32 22-31 73% 25 Special Condition* 16 Narrows Dr Sandoval Ave Kruse Rd 0.11 1,181 1.68 0.00 NP 29 20-29 80% 25 Round Down 85th Speed 17 Olympic Blvd Pine St Orange St 0.2 676 1.68 0.00 NP 27 19-28 78% 25 Closest to 85th Speed 18 Orange Ave Florpark St Shade Ln 0.48 3,327 1.68 0.00 25** 26 17-26 83% 25** Closest to 85th Speed 19 Paramount Blvd Telegraph Rd Slauson Ave 0.47 24,983 0.94 0.54 40** 42 31-40 70% 40** Closest to 85th Speed 20 Paramount Blvd Slauson Ave Washington Blvd 1.1 35,996 0.94 0.28 45 45 36-45 73% 45 Closest to 85th Speed * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification ** 25 mph when children are present
D Recommended Speed Limit Reduction D Recommended Speed Limit Increase *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 20

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed limits
Crash Posted Rec.

Dist. Rate*** Speed 85% 10 mi. %in Speed
No. Street From To (mi.) ADT Exp. Act. Limit Speed Pace Pace Limit Justification 21 Paramount Blvd Washington Blvd Maris Ave 0.58 23,401 0.96 0.20 40 43 33-42 71% 40 Round Down 85th Speed 22 Paramount Blvd Maris Ave Whittier Blvd 0.89 26,987 0.94 0.30 40 41 33-42 69% 40 Closest to 85th Speed 23 Paramount Blvd Whittier Blvd Beverly Blvd 0.62 28,420 0.94 0.10 40** 42 33-42 73% 40** Closest to 85th Speed 24 Paramount Blvd Beverly Blvd Gallatin Rd 0.33 13,051 1.68 0.00 35** 36 27-36 74% 35** Closest to 85th Speed 25 Passons Blvd Slauson Ave Washington Blvd 0.84 7,066 1.68 0.15 25** 31 20-29 71% 25** Special Condition* 26 Passons Blvd Washington Blvd Mines Ave 0.73 10,321 1.68 0.00 25** 29 21-30 82% 25** Round Down 85th Speed 27 Passons Blvd Mines Ave Whittier Blvd 0.74 8,467 1.68 0.00 25** 31 20-29 76% 25** Special Condition* 28 Rex Rd Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 0.52 5,618 0.96 0.00 35 36 26-35 62% 35 Closest to 85th Speed 29 Rosemead Blvd Telegraph Rd Washington Blvd 1.69 29,309 0.94 0.33 40 44 32-41 59% 40 Round Down 85th Speed 30 Rosemead Blvd Washington Blvd Whittier Blvd 1.49 31,758 0.94 0.33 40 43 34-43 62% 40 Round Down 85th Speed * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification ** 25 mph when children are present
D Recommended Speed Limit Reduction D Recommended Speed Limit Increase *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 21

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed limits
Crash Posted Rec.

Dist. Rate*** Speed 85% 10 mi. %in Speed
No. Street From To (mi.) ADT Exp. Act. Limit Speed Pace Pace Limit Justification 31 Rosemead Blvd Whittier Blvd Gallatin Rd 1.1 32,339 0.94 0.21 40 44 36-45 57% 40 Round Down 85th Speed 32 San Gabriel River Beverly Blvd Whittier Pumping 0.24 12,136 0.94 0.31 45 46 39-48 61% 45 Closest to 85th Speed Pkwy Plant
33 San Gabriel River Whittier Springland Dr 0.63 10,744 0.94 0.40 45 46 39-48 58% 45 Closest to 85th Speed Pkwy Pumping Plant
34 San Gabriel River Springland Dr Rose Hill Rd 0.5 9,627 0.94 1.14 45 46 37-46 48% 45 Closest to 85th Speed Pkwy
35 Serapis Ave Telegraph Rd Perkins St 0.96 3,759 1.68 0.00 25** 27 18-27 77% 25** Closest to 85th Speed 36 Slauson Ave WCL (430' W/O Rosemead Blvd 0.84 40,582 1.23 0.24 40 42 34-43 66% 40 Closest to 85th Speed Bluff Rd)
37 Slauson Ave Rosemead Blvd ECL (San Gabriel 0.96 63,719 1.23 0.40 40 42 33-42 63% 40 Closest to 85th Speed River Trail)
38 Telegraph Rd WCL (Bluff Rd) Rosemead Blvd 1.18 38,094 1.23 0.14 45 45 36-45 56% 45 Closest to 85th Speed 39 Telegraph Rd Rosemead Blvd ECL (San Gabriel 1.21 50,776 1.23 0.00 40 41 32-41 68% 40 Closest to 85th Speed River Trail)
40 Tobias Ave Beverly Rd Beverly Blvd 0.17 663 1.68 0.00 NP 28 18-27 77% 25 Round Down 85th Speed * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification ** 25 mph when children are present
D Recommended Speed Limit Reduction D Recommended Speed Limit Increase *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 22

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed limits
Crash Posted Rec.

Dist. Rate*** Speed 85% 10 mi. %in Speed
No. Street From To (mi.) ADT Exp. Act. Limit Speed Pace Pace Limit Justification 41 Washington Blvd WCL (Bluff Rd) Rosemead Blvd 1 36,573 1.23 0.37 40 43 33-42 66% 40 Round Down 85th Speed 42 Washington Blvd Rosemead Blvd ECL (San Gabriel 0.98 46,019 0.47 0.20 40 42 32-41 63% 40 Closest to 85th Speed River Trail)
43 Whittier Blvd WCL (Van Paramount Blvd 0.49 26,404 0.94 1.27 35 38 29-38 77% 35 Round Down 85th Speed Norman Rd)
44 Whittier Blvd Paramount Blvd ECL (Esperanza Ave) 1.19 31,967 0.94 0.24 35 37 28-37 73% 35 Closest to 85th Speed * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification ** 25 mph when children are present
D Recommended Speed Limit Reduction D Recommended Speed Limit Increase *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 23 City of Pico Rivera
2026 Engineering and
Traffic Survey Report
June 2026
Draft
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
6b
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 1

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
June 3, 2026
Kenner Guerrero
Associate Engineer, Public Works
6615 Passons Boulevard
Pico Rivera, CA 90660
Subject: Draft Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) - 2026 Dear Mr. Guerrero:

As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) to justify and update the posted speed limits along 44 street segments in the City of Pico Rivera. These segments were last surveyed in 2021 and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&TS procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices.

The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) dated January 2026, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.

We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Pico Rivera and the assistance, cooperation, and guidance afforded to us during the course of this study.

Very truly yours,

WILLDAN
Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E.

Traffic Engineer
Enclosure
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 2

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Table of Contents
Introduction........................................................................................................3 Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey.......................................................................................5 Speed Sampling......................................................................................................................................5 Crash History..........................................................................................................................................6 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists......................................................................................6 Safety Corridors – New from AB 43 .......................................................................................................6 A Land or Facility that Generates High Concentrations of Pedestrians or Bicyclists - New from AB 43 7 Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit – New from AB 43......................8 Residence Districts & Local Roads .........................................................................................................9 Survey Conditions.............................................................................................10 Survey Locations......................................................................................................................................10 Data Collection ........................................................................................................................................10 Speed Data...........................................................................................................................................10 Field Review Data ................................................................................................................................11 Crash Data ...........................................................................................................................................12 Residential Density and Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12p)...................12 Analysis ............................................................................................................13 Speed Limit Recommendations.........................................................................14 Recommendation Tables.........................................................................................................................14 Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits.............................................................................15 Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes..........................................................21 Table 3 – Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit.........................................................21 Segments with Special Conditions.....................................................................18 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists.......................................................................................18 Safety Corridors.......................................................................................................................................19 Residential Districts.................................................................................................................................20 Table 4 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limit ..............................................................................20 Appendices

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms

APPENDIX C
ADT Count Sheets

APPENDIX D
Safety Corridors

APPENDIX E
Survey Equipment

APPENDIX F
Legislative References
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 3

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Introduction
This E&TS is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Pico Rivera. This E&TS presents recommended speed limits for 44 street segments in the City of Pico Rivera. E&T Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local, major, secondary, collector, and arterial streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. Historically, these surveys must be updated every 7 to 14 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions, and can be enforced per CVC Section 40802.

E&T Surveys are prepared under the direction of CVC Sections 627,22350-22359, and 40801-40803. The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) dated January 2026.

Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43), signed in October 2021, has given local agencies more leeway in lowering and maintaining speed limits aimed at enhancing traffic safety. The California Vehicle Code was amended in 2022 and the CA MUTCD was amended in March 2023 and updated in January 2026 to implement laws and guidelines with the changes set forth in AB 43. There were three major changes to how speed limits can be recommended under AB 43 as follows:

1. An E&T Survey conducted more than 7 years ago may be extended to 14 years (previously to 10 years) if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)].

2. A local authority may establish and designate safety corridors throughout their jurisdiction. The local authority may recommend a speed limit with an additional five mile per hour reduction on segments designated as safety corridors. Local authorities may not lower a speed limit under this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in January 2026, this report reflects lowering speeds on these designated roadway segments.

3. If a local authority, after completing an E&T Survey, finds that the speed limit is still reasonable or safe, the local authority may retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

This E&TS was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Sheriff’s Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the Sheriff’s Department(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)].

Posted speed limits are primarily established to protect the public by mitigating the risks posed by reckless and unpredictable driving behavior. The posted speed limits provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law [CVC Section 22350]. This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 4

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually conducted to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.

The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the CA MUTCD and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey:

1. Measurement of prevailing speed based on the 85th percentile rule

2. Accident history on the roadway

3. Roadway conditions and other relevant factors that are not readily apparent to the motorist.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.

Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers.

To achieve desired operating speeds, agencies often implement other speed management strategies concurrently with setting speed limits, such as traffic calming measures, geometric design features, speed safety cameras, and increased enforcement.

The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 5

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates. Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.

Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey
The CA MUTCD specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&TS are discussed in more detail as follows:

Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. A speed limit is established in the options below.

Options:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed – A speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12z) ▪ Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require rounding down, the speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12aa) ▪ Rounding Down - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ab) ▪ Additional 5 mph Speed Reduction – Additional lowering of the speed limits from those calculated using rounding down or using the reduction using special conditions is prohibited, except for the local agency roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC Sections 22358.6(d) and 22358.7. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ag) If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&T Survey shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ac)
The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85th-percentile speed. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ae) 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 6

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Examples Showing the Applicability of Rounding and Additional Speed Reduction 85th
Percentile
Speed
(mph)
Rounding to the
nearest 5 mph
increment
If rounding to the
nearest is up, may
round down
If rounding to the
nearest is down, it
may be additional
be lowered by 5
mph
If safety corridor or
adjacent to high
concentration of
bicyclists &
pedestrians, may
additional lower by
5 mph
48-50 50 45 N/A 40
45-47 45 N/A 40 35
43-45 45 40 N/A 35
40-42 40 N/A 35 30
Crash History
Reported crashes reviewed from California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than expected average rate of crashes. A segment that has an above-average crash rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph below the basic speed limit.

The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning.

Conditions not readily apparent to motorists include the considerations of crash history, poor visibility, and the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians.

Safety Corridors – New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7, a new section added through AB 43, to additionally lower the speed limit by designating a safety corridor, shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in 2026 on these designated roadway segments, this report reflects lowering speeds using the application of safety corridors.

A safety corridor is defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ai) 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 7

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent E&T Survey performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12al) The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall include the following three requirements. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12am):

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.

Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12an)
A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data. For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ao-ap)
A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ar)
The Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor.

Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12as) The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, plus an additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation, shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85-percentile speed. Refer to (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ae) A Land or Facility that Generates High Concentrations of Pedestrians or Bicyclists - New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additional lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.

Since the E&TS was completed in 2026 on these designated roadway segments, this report reflects lowering speeds using the application of land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians.

A land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians is a portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed below are present within a distance of 1320 feet longitudinally and has supporting crash data that demonstrates the highway segment is within the top 20% of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three to five year period within the jurisdiction. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12at).
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 8

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Table 2B-105(CA) - Requirements to determine Land or Facility that Generates High Concentrations of Bicyclists or Pedestrians
Category Generator
Land Use Employment centers
Presence of retail
Parks, multi-use trails, and recreational destinations
Schools/universities
Senior Centers
Cultural areas, entertainment space areas, or areas of community significance
Religious facilities
Health/medical facilities
Transit Factors Transit stops
Transit Oriented Developments / Transit Priority Areas
Presence of
Pedestrian/Bicyclist
Infrastructure
Sidewalk presence
Crosswalk presence
Bikeway presence
Nearby signalized intersections on four-way intersections Presence of micromobility devices such as bicycles or scooters Demographic Factors Presence of vulnerable groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused
MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status Presence of students (all levels)
Local Data Need identified in a safety analysis such as a road safety audit or formalized planning document such as a local road safety plan If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).

The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, plus an additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation, shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85-percentile speed. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ae) Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit – New from AB 43 The City may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8, added through AB 43.

The currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&T Survey, the City finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 9

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
If the City decides to use a lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&T Survey and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit or not below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).

Residence Districts & Local Roads
The lawful use of a posted speed limit involves two separate steps:

1. Establishing the Speed Limit Lawfully –Under CVC Sections 22357 and 22358, a posted speed limit must generally be supported by a valid E&T Survey. However, certain situations are exempt from this requirement including:
▪ Residence districts (§ 22352)
▪ Narrow residential Streets (§ 22358.3)
▪ School zones (§ 22358.4)
▪ Senior zones (§ 22352(b)(2))
▪ Business activity districts (§ 22358.9)

2. Enforcing the Speed Limit Lawfully – Even if a speed limit is properly established, it must also be enforceable under the CVC’s prohibition on speed traps (§ 40802). Radar may be used only when supported by an E&TS, except in the following locations:
▪ Local streets or roads (§ 40802(b)(1))
▪ School zones (§ 40802(b)(2))
▪ Senior zones (§ 40802(b)(3))
▪ Business activity districts (§ 40802(b)(4))
Within residence districts, a 25-mph prima facie speed limit is designated by CVC Section 22352(b)(1), unless a different speed is determined by ordinance using an E&TS. A residence district is defined in CVC Section 515 as a segment with a residential density greater than either of the following ratios:
▪ On one side of the highway, within a quarter mile, 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures; or
▪ On both sides combined, within a quarter mile, 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

A residence district may extend longer than a quarter mile if the above density ratio continues.

Local streets or roads, as defined in CVC Section 40802(b)(1), are either functionally classified as “local” on the California Road System Maps or meet all of the following criteria:
▪ Primarily provide access to abutting residential property, ▪ Are no more than 40 feet wide,
▪ Have no more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length, and ▪ Have no more than one traffic lane in each direction.

For a 25-mph prima facie speed limit to be both established and enforceable on a residential street without an E&T Survey, the roadway must qualify as both:

1. A residence district, so that the 25-mph limit is lawfully established without an E&T Survey; and

2. A local street or road, so that the speed limit is enforceable with radar without creating a prohibited speed trap.
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 10

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Survey Conditions
The E&T Study considered the roadway context. The factors that are considered when conducting an E&T Survey are the following (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.07):

1. Roadway environment not readily apparent to the driver (CVC § 627) (such as roadside development, number and frequency of driveways and access points, and land use), functional classification, public transit volume and location or frequency of stops, parking practices, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities and activity;

2. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the driver (CVC § 627) (such as lane widths, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, median type, and sight distance);

3. Geographic context (such as residential district, business district, business activity district;

4. Reported crash experience for at least a 36-month period;

5. Speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles including the pace, median (50th-percentile), and 85th- percentile speeds; and

6. A review of past speed studies to identify any trends in operating speeds (CVC § 22358.8) Survey Locations
The procedures below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Pico Rivera. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following:

1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.

2. Minimum visibility restrictions.

3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.

4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.

Data Collection
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic crashes, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. ADT and field reviews were conducted at 44 locations during the months of February and March 2026. The ADT forms are in Appendix C.

Speed Data
Prevailing speeds were determined by a speed zone survey for each roadway segment. The speed zone surveys follow the following guidelines identified in the CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12n:
(A) The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements. (B) Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or, 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 11

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
(C) Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.
(D) A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section. If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs. (E) Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic. (F) The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing. (G) The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.
(H) In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.
(I) Short speed zones of less than 0.5 miles should be avoided, except in transition areas. (J) Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.
(K) Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Speed zone surveys were conducted at 44 locations during the months of February and March 2026. The radar speed distribution forms are in Appendix B.

Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors:

1. Street width and alignment;

2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;

3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;

4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;

5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;

6. Visibility obstructions;

7. Land use and proximity to schools;

8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;

9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and

10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver. 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 12

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Crash Data
Crash data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database. For this study, crash data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2025. The crash rates for the 44 segments are expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles (C/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the crash rate:

𝑹 =
𝑪 × 𝟏, 𝟎𝟎𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝒕 × 𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔
𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓
× 𝒍 × 𝒗
C = Number of midblock crashes over time period
R = Crash Rate (crashes/million vehicle miles)
t = Time Period Covered (in years)
l = Length of Segment (miles)
v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment crash rate was then compared to the average statewide crash rate of similar roadways.

The average statewide crash rates were obtained from 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans.

Residential Density and Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12p) When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider residential density and bicyclist and pedestrian safety.

If any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 miles, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 miles the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 miles but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph 1 or 2 above.

Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 13

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Analysis
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in the CA MUTCD. Some of the criteria used are:

A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed.

B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed.

C. The crash rate for each street segment is compared to average crash rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average crash rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Pico Rivera.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of available data and recommend a speed limit for each of the 44 street segments surveyed based on the guidelines for an Engineering and Traffic Survey set forth by the CA MUTCD and the CVC. A complete summary of all 44 E&TS recommendations is shown in Table 1. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a crash rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in the Segments with Special Conditions section of this report.

The California State Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions. 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 14

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Speed Limit Recommendations
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.

The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12s) Recommendation Tables
Tables 1-3 summarizing the recommendations are referenced below and included in the following pages. The speed limit recommendations have been organized into the following three tables:

Recommendation Table
Total Number
of Segments
Table 1 - Summary of E&TS Recommended Speed Limits 44
Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Changes to the Posted Speed Limit 4 Table 3 - Recommended Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit 40 Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Beverly Blvd WCL (200' E/O
Rea Dr)
1 Rosemead Blvd 0.68 40,637 1.23 0.33 40 42 34-43 66 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed Beverly Blvd Rosemead Blvd ECL (290' W/O
Pioneer Blvd)
2 1.1 36,577 1.23 0.27 40** 42 33-42 62 % 40** Closest to 85th Speed 3 Beverly Rd WCL (Culp Dr) Rosemead Blvd 0.7 5,960 1.68 0.22 35** 37 28-37 76 % 35** Closest to 85th Speed Beverly Rd Rosemead Blvd San Gabriel River
Pkwy
4 0.64 4,716 1.68 0.00 35 39 29-38 72 % 35 Round Down 85th Speed 5 Durfee Ave Whittier Blvd Beverly Rd 0.67 11,479 1.68 0.12 25** 32 22-31 76 % 25** Special Condition* 6 Durfee Ave Beverly Rd Gallatin Rd 0.48 5,569 1.68 0.34 25** 30 22-31 83 % 25** Special Condition* 7 Durfee Ave Gallatin Rd Kruse Rd 0.31 5,160 1.68 0.00 25 31 21-30 74 % 25 Special Condition* 8 Fairway Dr Cypress Point Bradgate Dr 0.35 1,098 1.68 0.00 25 33 22-31 70 % 25 Special Condition* 9 Gallatin Rd Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 0.35 10,300 1.68 0.00 30 34 25-34 67 % 30 Round Down 85th Speed 10 Jackson St Whittier Blvd Passons Blvd 0.14 4,228 1.68 0.00 NP 27 18-27 74 % 25 Closest to 85th Speed 19 *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
11 Kruse Rd Narrows Dr Durfee Ave 0.43 1,773 1.68 1.20 25 29 19-28 77 % 25 Round Down 85th Speed 12 Loch Lomond Dr Van Norman Rd Paramount Blvd 0.39 2,029 1.68 0.00 25 33 23-32 64 % 25 Special Condition* 13 Mines Ave Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 0.34 2,642 1.68 0.00 35 39 30-39 74 % 35 Round Down 85th Speed 14 Mines Ave Rosemead Blvd Passons Blvd 0.41 5,412 1.68 0.00 30** 37 24-33 63 % 30** Special Condition* 15 Mines Ave Passons Blvd Rimbank Ave 0.32 409 1.68 0.00 25 32 22-31 73 % 25 Special Condition* 16 Narrows Dr Sandoval Ave Kruse Rd 0.11 1,181 1.68 0.00 NP 29 20-29 80 % 25 Round Down 85th Speed 17 Olympic Blvd Pine St Orange St 0.2 676 1.68 0.00 NP 27 19-28 78 % 25 Closest to 85th Speed 18 Orange Ave Florpark St Shade Ln 0.48 3,327 1.68 0.00 25** 26 17-26 83 % 25** Closest to 85th Speed 19 Paramount Blvd Telegraph Rd Slauson Ave 0.47 24,983 0.94 0.54 40** 42 31-40 70 % 40** Closest to 85th Speed 20 Paramount Blvd Slauson Ave Washington Blvd 1.1 35,996 0.94 0.28 45 45 36-45 73 % 45 Closest to 85th Speed 20 *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
21 Paramount Blvd Washington Blvd Maris Ave 0.58 23,401 0.96 0.20 40 43 33-42 71 % 40 Round Down 85th Speed 22 Paramount Blvd Maris Ave Whittier Blvd 0.89 26,987 0.94 0.30 40 41 33-42 69 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed 23 Paramount Blvd Whittier Blvd Beverly Blvd 0.62 28,420 0.94 0.10 40** 42 33-42 73 % 40** Closest to 85th Speed 24 Paramount Blvd Beverly Blvd Gallatin Rd 0.33 13,051 1.68 0.00 35** 36 27-36 74 % 35** Closest to 85th Speed 25 Passons Blvd Slauson Ave Washington Blvd 0.84 7,066 1.68 0.15 25** 31 20-29 71 % 25** Special Condition* 26 Passons Blvd Washington Blvd Mines Ave 0.73 10,321 1.68 0.00 25** 29 21-30 82 % 25** Round Down 85th Speed 27 Passons Blvd Mines Ave Whittier Blvd 0.74 8,467 1.68 0.00 25** 31 20-29 76 % 25** Special Condition* 28 Rex Rd Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 0.52 5,618 0.96 0.00 35 36 26-35 62 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed 29 Rosemead Blvd Telegraph Rd Washington Blvd 1.69 29,309 0.94 0.33 40 44 32-41 59 % 40 Round Down 85th Speed 30 Rosemead Blvd Washington Blvd Whittier Blvd 1.49 31,758 0.94 0.33 40 43 34-43 62 % 40 Round Down 85th Speed 21 *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
31 Rosemead Blvd Whittier Blvd Gallatin Rd 1.1 32,339 0.94 0.21 40 44 36-45 57 % 40 Round Down 85th Speed San Gabriel River
Pkwy
Beverly Blvd Whittier Pumping
Plant
32 0.24 12,136 0.94 0.31 45 46 39-48 61 % 45 Closest to 85th Speed San Gabriel River
Pkwy
Whittier
Pumping Plant
33 Springland Dr 0.63 10,744 0.94 0.40 45 46 39-48 58 % 45 Closest to 85th Speed San Gabriel River
Pkwy
34 Springland Dr Rose Hill Rd 0.5 9,627 0.94 1.14 45 46 37-46 48 % 45 Closest to 85th Speed 35 Serapis Ave Telegraph Rd Perkins St 0.96 3,759 1.68 0.00 25** 27 18-27 77 % 25** Closest to 85th Speed Slauson Ave WCL (430' W/O
Bluff Rd)
36 Rosemead Blvd 0.84 40,582 1.23 0.24 40 42 34-43 66 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed Slauson Ave Rosemead Blvd ECL (San Gabriel
River Trail)
37 0.96 63,719 1.23 0.40 40 42 33-42 63 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed 38 Telegraph Rd WCL (Bluff Rd) Rosemead Blvd 1.18 38,094 1.23 0.14 45 45 36-45 56 % 45 Closest to 85th Speed Telegraph Rd Rosemead Blvd ECL (San Gabriel
River Trail)
39 1.21 50,776 1.23 0.00 40 41 32-41 68 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 Tobias Ave Beverly Rd Beverly Blvd 0.17 663 1.68 0.00 NP 28 18-27 77 % 25 Round Down 85th Speed 22 *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
41 Washington Blvd WCL (Bluff Rd) Rosemead Blvd 1 36,573 1.23 0.37 40 43 33-42 66 % 40 Round Down 85th Speed Washington Blvd Rosemead Blvd ECL (San Gabriel
River Trail)
42 0.98 46,019 0.47 0.20 40 42 32-41 63 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed Whittier Blvd WCL (Van
Norman Rd)
43 Paramount Blvd 0.49 26,404 0.94 1.27 35 38 29-38 77 % 35 Round Down 85th Speed 44 Whittier Blvd Paramount Blvd ECL (Esperanza Ave) 1.19 31,967 0.94 0.24 35 37 28-37 73 % 35 Closest to 85th Speed 23 *** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction Recommended Speed Limit Increase Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes No. Street From To Existing New Change

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
10 Jackson St Whittier Blvd Passons Blvd NP 25 PL
16 Narrows Dr Sandoval Ave Kruse Rd NP 25 PL
17 Olympic Blvd Pine St Orange St NP 25 PL
40 Tobias Ave Beverly Rd Beverly Blvd NP 25 PL
Total Segments with Recommended Speed Limit Changes = 4 PL= Post Speed Limit Sign
NP= No Posted Speed Limit
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 24
Table 3 - Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit No. Street From To Existing New

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
1 Beverly Blvd WCL (200' E/O Rea Dr) Rosemead Blvd 40 40 2 Beverly Blvd Rosemead Blvd ECL (290' W/O Pioneer Blvd) 40 40 3 Beverly Rd WCL (Culp Dr) Rosemead Blvd 35 35
4 Beverly Rd Rosemead Blvd San Gabriel River Pkwy 35 35 5 Durfee Ave Whittier Blvd Beverly Rd 25 25
6 Durfee Ave Beverly Rd Gallatin Rd 25 25
7 Durfee Ave Gallatin Rd Kruse Rd 25 25
8 Fairway Dr Cypress Point Bradgate Dr 25 25
9 Gallatin Rd Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 30 30
11 Kruse Rd Narrows Dr Durfee Ave 25 25
12 Loch Lomond Dr Van Norman Rd Paramount Blvd 25 25
13 Mines Ave Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 35 35
14 Mines Ave Rosemead Blvd Passons Blvd 30 30
15 Mines Ave Passons Blvd Rimbank Ave 25 25
18 Orange Ave Florpark St Shade Ln 25 25
19 Paramount Blvd Telegraph Rd Slauson Ave 40 40
20 Paramount Blvd Slauson Ave Washington Blvd 45 45
21 Paramount Blvd Washington Blvd Maris Ave 40 40
22 Paramount Blvd Maris Ave Whittier Blvd 40 40
23 Paramount Blvd Whittier Blvd Beverly Blvd 40 40
24 Paramount Blvd Beverly Blvd Gallatin Rd 35 35
25 Passons Blvd Slauson Ave Washington Blvd 25 25
26 Passons Blvd Washington Blvd Mines Ave 25 25
27 Passons Blvd Mines Ave Whittier Blvd 25 25
28 Rex Rd Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 35 35
29 Rosemead Blvd Telegraph Rd Washington Blvd 40 40
30 Rosemead Blvd Washington Blvd Whittier Blvd 40 40
31 Rosemead Blvd Whittier Blvd Gallatin Rd 40 40
32 San Gabriel River Pkwy Beverly Blvd Whittier Pumping Plant 45 45 33 San Gabriel River Pkwy Whittier Pumping Plant Springland Dr 45 45 34 San Gabriel River Pkwy Springland Dr Rose Hill Rd 45 45 35 Serapis Ave Telegraph Rd Perkins St 25 25
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 25
Table 3 - Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit No. Street From To Existing New

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
36 Slauson Ave WCL (430' W/O Bluff Rd) Rosemead Blvd 40 40 37 Slauson Ave Rosemead Blvd ECL (San Gabriel River Trail) 40 40 38 Telegraph Rd WCL (Bluff Rd) Rosemead Blvd 45 45
39 Telegraph Rd Rosemead Blvd ECL (San Gabriel River Trail) 40 40 41 Washington Blvd WCL (Bluff Rd) Rosemead Blvd 40 40
42 Washington Blvd Rosemead Blvd ECL (San Gabriel River Trail) 40 40 43 Whittier Blvd WCL (Van Norman Rd) Paramount Blvd 35 35 44 Whittier Blvd Paramount Blvd ECL (Esperanza Ave) 35 35 Total Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit = 40
PL= Post Speed Limit Sign
NP= No Posted Speed Limit
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 26
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
18 Segments with Special Conditions
This section is meant to further explain the use of special conditions to lower the recommended speed limit lower than the 85th Percentile speed. These special conditions include the following:
▪ Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
▪ Safety Corridors
▪ Residential Districts
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more above or below the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Each segment is discussed below.

Segment 5 – Durfee Avenue – Whittier Boulevard to Beverly Road This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 11,479 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial and a school zone along the 0.67-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 32 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit.

However, to maintain uniformity with adjacent segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reason.

Segment 6 – Durfee Avenue – Beverly Road to Gallatin Road This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 5,569 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and a school zone along the 0.48-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 30 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to hidden driveways that are not readily apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reason.

Segment 7 – Durfee Avenue – Gallatin Road to Kruse Road This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 5,160 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.31-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 31 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, due to hidden driveways that are not readily apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reason.

Segment 14 – Mines Avenue – Rosemead Boulevard to Passons Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 5,412 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and a school zone along the 0.41-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit.

However, to maintain uniformity with adjacent segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 30 mph for the above reason. 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
19 Segment 15 – Mines Avenue – Passons Boulevard to Rimbank Avenue This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 409 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.32-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 32 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the segment having high residential density with diagonal and parallel parking, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reason.

Segment 25 – Passons Boulevard – Slauson Avenue to Washington Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 7,066 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and a school zone along the 0.84-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 31 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to hidden driveways and moderate pedestrian use that are not readily apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reason.

Segment 27 – Passons Boulevard – Mines Avenue to Whittier Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 8,467 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and a school zone along the 0.74-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 31 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to an uncontrolled crosswalk that is not readily apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reason.

Safety Corridors
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were reduced an additional 5 miles per hour (mph) below the engineer’s initial recommended speed limit to the segment being in a designated safety corridor. Each segment is discussed below.

Segment 8 – Fairway Drive – Cypress Point to Bradgate Drive This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,098 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.35-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 33 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit by rounding down to the nearest 5-mph speed. However, the segment is along a designated safety corridor and the City recommends that the speed limit remain at 25 mph. The reduced speed limit is less than 12.4 mph below the 85th percentile speed.

Segment 12 – Loch Lomond Drive – Van Norman Road to Paramount Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,029 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is industrial along the 0.39-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 33 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit by rounding down to the nearest 5-mph speed. However, the segment is along a designated safety corridor and the City recommends that the speed limit remain at 25 mph. The reduced speed limit is less than 12.4 mph below the 85th percentile speed.
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
20 Residential Districts
The following segments identified in Table 4 have been identified as residential districts. These segments’ speed limits do not need to be justified with an E&T Survey and can be posted at 25 mph. The residence district requirements and segment conditions are met for both local road and residential density thresholds.

Table 4 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limit
No. Segment From To Length (Miles)
1 Bradgate Dr Fairway Dr Sandoval Ave 0.1
2 Catherine/Almo St Rosemead Blvd Passons Blvd 0.33
3 Kinedale Ave Telegraph Rd Florpark St 0.26
4 Lexington Rd Whittier Blvd EOR 0.1
5 Passons Blvd Telepgraph Rd Sunglow St 0.31
6 Passons Blvd Sunglow St Slauson Ave 0.63
7 Pine St Olympic Blvd Beverly Rd 0.33
8 Pine St Beverly Rd Beverly Blvd 0.15
9 Rex Rd Rosemead Blvd Passons Blvd 0.5
10 Sandoval Ave Bradgate Dr Narrows Dr 0.04
11 Serapis Ave Rivera Rd Rex Rd 0.23
12 Shade Ln Orange Ave Passons Blvd 0.33
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data
Segment 1

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Beverly Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM WCL (200' E/O Rea Dr) TO Rosemead Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/27/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:37 PM 50th Percentile Speed 38 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 34-43 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 40,637
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Rosemead, Paramount, Acacia, Rea Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.68 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 80 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 6 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 10
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.33 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 0.88

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 2

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Beverly Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Rosemead Blvd TO ECL (290' W/O Pioneer Blvd)

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/5/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM 50th Percentile Speed 38 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 33-42 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 62 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 36,577
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Pioneer, Abbeywood, San Gabriel River Pkwy, Sandoval, Durfee, Rosemead
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 1.10 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 80 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 6 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.27 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 2 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 11.5

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 3

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Beverly Rd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM WCL (Culp Dr) TO Rosemead Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/3/2026 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:03 AM 50th Percentile Speed 33 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
10 mph Pace 28-37 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 25 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,960
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Pine; TS @ Paramount, Rosemead Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks Yes @ Oak
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.70 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 45 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.22 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 0.86

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 35 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 4

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Beverly Rd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Rosemead Blvd TO San Gabriel River Pkwy

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/3/2026 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:25 AM 50th Percentile Speed 34 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
10 mph Pace 29-38 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,716
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Rosemead, Durfee; AWS @ Canal, San Gabriel River Pkwy Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks Yes @ Tobias
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.64 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 70 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides, Many
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 1 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 1 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 8.75

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 35 mph
Justification Round Down 85th Speed
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 5

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Durfee Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Whittier Blvd TO Beverly Rd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2026 85th Percentile Speed 32 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM 50th Percentile Speed 26 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 22-31 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 25 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,479
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Beverly Rd, Walnut, Whittier; AWS @ Olympic, West Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Length of Segment 0.67 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 68 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.12 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 0.9

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 25 mph
Justification Maintain Uniformity with Adjacent Segments Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 6

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Durfee Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Beverly Rd TO Gallatin Rd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2026 85th Percentile Speed 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:07 AM 50th Percentile Speed 26 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 22-31 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 25 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,569
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Gallatin, Harrell; TS @ Beverly Blvd, Beverly Rd Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.48 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 40 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides, Many
Roadway Conditions Poor Visibility Fair
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.34 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes Safety Factor per mile 0.63

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 25 mph
Justification Hidden Driveways
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 7

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Durfee Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Gallatin Rd TO Kruse Rd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/6/2026 85th Percentile Speed 31 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:20 PM 50th Percentile Speed 25 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 21-30 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 25 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,160
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Kruse, Gallatin
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.31 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 60 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Fair
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 0.97

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 8

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Fairway Dr CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Cypress Point TO Bradgate Dr

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/10/2026 85th Percentile Speed 33 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:32 AM 50th Percentile Speed 26 mph Number of Survey Samples 149 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 22-31 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,098
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Cypress
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, River
Length of Segment 0.35 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 30 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting West Side Only
Vertical Curve No Driveways West Side Only, Few
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks West Side Only
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 0.86

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 25 mph
Round Down 85th Speed & Safety Corridor Justification
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 9

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Gallatin Rd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Paramount Blvd TO Rosemead Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/5/2026 85th Percentile Speed 34 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:15 AM 50th Percentile Speed 29 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph
10 mph Pace 25-34 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 30 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10,300
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Rosemead
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.35 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 60 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways South Side Only
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Fair
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2 + TWLTL + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 30 mph
Justification Round Down 85th Speed
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 10

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Jackson St CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Whittier Blvd TO Passons Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/27/2026 85th Percentile Speed 27 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:50 AM 50th Percentile Speed 23 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit NP mph
10 mph Pace 18-27 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,228
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Passons; TS @ Whittier
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Length of Segment 0.14 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 57 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Fair
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 25 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 11

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Kruse Rd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Narrows Dr TO Durfee Ave

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2026 85th Percentile Speed 29 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:01 AM 50th Percentile Speed 24 mph Number of Survey Samples 180 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 19-28 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,773
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Gangle, Durfee
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Residential
Length of Segment 0.43 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 40 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways North Side
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 1.20 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No Safety Factor per mile 0.7

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 25 mph
Justification Round Down 85th Speed
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 12

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Loch Lomond Dr CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Van Norman Rd TO Paramount Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/5/2026 85th Percentile Speed 33 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:38 AM 50th Percentile Speed 27 mph Number of Survey Samples 138 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 23-32 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 30 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,029
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Paramount
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Length of Segment 0.39 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 40 feet Truck Traffic Heavy
Horizontal Curve No Lighting North Side Only
Vertical Curve No Driveways North Side Only
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Fair
Sidewalks North Side Only
On-Street Parking North Side Only
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 0.77

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 13

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Mines Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Paramount Blvd TO Rosemead Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/5/2026 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:49 PM 50th Percentile Speed 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
10 mph Pace 30-39 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,642
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Paramount, Rosemead
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Manzanar
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.34 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 40 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides, Few
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 0.88

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 14

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Mines Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Rosemead Blvd TO Passons Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/6/2026 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:07 AM 50th Percentile Speed 31 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph
10 mph Pace 24-33 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 30 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,412
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Rosemead; AWS @ Lindsey, Passons Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.41 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 40 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community No Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes Safety Factor per mile 0

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 30 mph
Justification Maintain Uniformity with Adjacent Segments Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 15

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Mines Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Passons Blvd TO Rimbank Ave

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/6/2026 85th Percentile Speed 32 mph Time of Speed Survey 12:08 PM 50th Percentile Speed 26 mph Number of Survey Samples 160 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 22-31 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 25 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 409
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Passons
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.32 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 43 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides, Few
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 25 mph
Justification Residential Density
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 16

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Narrows Dr CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Sandoval Ave TO Kruse Rd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2026 85th Percentile Speed 29 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:15 PM 50th Percentile Speed 24 mph Number of Survey Samples 80 Posted Speed Limit NP mph
10 mph Pace 20-29 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,181
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Sandoval; Stop @ Kruse
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.11 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 40 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting West Side Only
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Fair
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 2.73

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 17

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Olympic Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Pine St TO Orange St

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/27/2026 85th Percentile Speed 27 mph Time of Speed Survey 12:09 PM 50th Percentile Speed 25 mph Number of Survey Samples 117 Posted Speed Limit NP mph
10 mph Pace 19-28 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 676
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Grape, Orange
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.20 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 53 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting North Side Only
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Poor Visibility Fair
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 1.5

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 18

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Orange Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Florpark St TO Shade Ln

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/2/2026 85th Percentile Speed 26 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:39 AM 50th Percentile Speed 23 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 17-26 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,327
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Florpark; AWS @ Sunglow, Charlesworth, Maxine, Shade Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Nova
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.48 miles Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Width 36 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting East Side Only
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides, Many
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes Safety Factor per mile 0.63

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 19

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Paramount Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Telegraph Rd TO Slauson Ave

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/26/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 31-40 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 24,983
Date of ADT 2/25/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Slauson, Telegraph
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Maxine
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.47 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 84 feet Truck Traffic Heavy
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides, Few
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.54 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 1 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 5.53

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 20

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Paramount Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Slauson Ave TO Washington Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/26/2026 85th Percentile Speed 45 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:37 AM 50th Percentile Speed 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph
10 mph Pace 36-45 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 45 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 35,996
Date of ADT 2/25/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Washington, Canford, Rex, Slauson Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Length of Segment 1.10 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 94 feet Truck Traffic Heavy
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.28 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 45 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 21

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Paramount Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Washington Blvd TO Maris Ave

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/26/2026 85th Percentile Speed 43 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:10 AM 50th Percentile Speed 39 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 33-42 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 23,401
Date of ADT 2/25/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Washington
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.58 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 70 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides, Many
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 4
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.20 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 1 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 4.48

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Justification Round Down 85th Speed
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 22

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Paramount Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Maris Ave TO Whittier Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/26/2026 85th Percentile Speed 41 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:48 AM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 33-42 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 26,987
Date of ADT 2/25/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Mines, Loch Lomond, Village Walk Way, Whittier Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential
Length of Segment 0.89 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 58 feet Truck Traffic Moderate
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways East Side Only, Few
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Fair
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.30 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 2 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 9.33

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 23

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Paramount Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Whittier Blvd TO Beverly Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/26/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:31 AM 50th Percentile Speed 38 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 33-42 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 28,420
Date of ADT 2/25/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Whittier, Beverly Rd, Beverly Blvd Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Elba
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.62 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 82 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting @ Raised Median
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.10 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes Safety Factor per mile 0.48

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 24

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Paramount Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Beverly Blvd TO Gallatin Rd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/27/2026 85th Percentile Speed 36 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:24 PM 50th Percentile Speed 32 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
10 mph Pace 27-36 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 13,051
Date of ADT 2/25/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Beverly Blvd
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Ibsen
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.33 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 76 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2 + Raised Median + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 1.82

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 25

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Passons Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Slauson Ave TO Washington Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/6/2026 85th Percentile Speed 31 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:02 AM 50th Percentile Speed 26 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 20-29 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 25 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7,066
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Slauson, Rivera, Washington; AWS @ Rex, Danbridge Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.84 miles Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Width 40 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.15 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 25 mph
Justification Hidden Driveways & Moderate Pedestrian Use Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 26

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Passons Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Washington Blvd TO Mines Ave

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/4/2026 85th Percentile Speed 29 mph Time of Speed Survey 12:42 PM 50th Percentile Speed 25 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 21-30 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 25 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10,321
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Washington, Haney; AWS @ Balfour, Mines (Overhead Flashing Beacon)
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Cosgrove
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.73 miles Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Width 40 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides, Many
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 2 Disadvantaged Community No Speed Related 2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 16.4

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 27

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Passons Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Mines Ave TO Whittier Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/5/2026 85th Percentile Speed 31 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:13 PM 50th Percentile Speed 25 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 20-29 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 25 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,467
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Mines (Overhead Flashing Beacon), Reichling, Loch Lomond, Jackson; TS @ Whittier
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Holbrook
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.74 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 40 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 1 Disadvantaged Community No Speed Related 1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 8.51

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 25 mph
Justification Uncontrolled Crosswalk
Field Study By LA Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pico Rivera was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 28

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Rex Rd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Paramount Blvd TO Rosemead Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/4/2026 85th Percentile Speed 36 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:19 PM 50th Percentile Speed 31 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
10 mph Pace 26-35 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 62 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,618
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Rosemead, Paramount
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Length of Segment 0.52 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 65 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 4
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 29

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Rosemead Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Telegraph Rd TO Washington Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/2/2026 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:46 PM 50th Percentile Speed 38 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 32-41 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 59 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 29,309
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Washington, Rex, Slauson, Terradell, Telegraph Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Length of Segment 1.69 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 80 feet Truck Traffic Moderate
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 18
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.33 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 8 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 2 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 22.8

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 30

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Rosemead Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Washington Blvd TO Whittier Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/4/2026 85th Percentile Speed 43 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:18 PM 50th Percentile Speed 38 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 34-43 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 62 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 31,758
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Whittier, Manzanar, Mines, Coffman and Pico, The Marketplace, Washington
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Length of Segment 1.49 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 80 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve None Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 17
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.33 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 5 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 3 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 15.6

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 31

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Rosemead Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Whittier Blvd TO Gallatin Rd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/5/2026 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:40 AM 50th Percentile Speed 39 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 36-45 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 57 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 32,339
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Whittier, Olympic, Beverly Rd, Beverly Blvd, Gallatin Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 1.10 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 64 feet Truck Traffic Moderate
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Fair
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.21 crashes/MVM

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 32

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET San Gabriel River Pkwy CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Beverly Blvd TO Whittier Pumping Plant

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/3/2026 85th Percentile Speed 46 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:03 PM 50th Percentile Speed 42 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph
10 mph Pace 39-48 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 45 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 61 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 12,136
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Beverly, Melita
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.24 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 56 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.31 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 1.25

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 33

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET San Gabriel River Pkwy CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Whittier Pumping Plant TO Springland Dr

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/3/2026 85th Percentile Speed 46 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:09 PM 50th Percentile Speed 42 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph
10 mph Pace 39-48 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 45 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 58 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10,744
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Springland, Woodford
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Length of Segment 0.63 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 100 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks None
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.40 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No Safety Factor per mile 0.48

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 34

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET San Gabriel River Pkwy CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Springland Dr TO Rose Hill Rd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/10/2026 85th Percentile Speed 46 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:30 AM 50th Percentile Speed 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph
10 mph Pace 37-46 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 45 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 48 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9,627
Date of ADT 2/12/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control AWS @ Springland, Rose Hill
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Length of Segment 0.50 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 100 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting West Side Only
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides, Few
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks None
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median + Bike Lane
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 1.14 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No Safety Factor per mile 0.6

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 35

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Serapis Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Telegraph Rd TO Perkins St

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/2/2026 85th Percentile Speed 27 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:23 AM 50th Percentile Speed 23 mph Number of Survey Samples 109 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 18-27 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,759
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Telegraph, Slauson; AWS @ Claymore, Teradell, Aero, Myron, Burke, Bermudez
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.96 miles Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Width 45 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone Yes Safety Factor per mile 0.31

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 36

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Slauson Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM WCL (430' W/O Bluff Rd) TO Rosemead Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/2/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:20 PM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 34-43 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 40,582
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Paramount, Crossway, Rosemead Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Commercial, Residential
Length of Segment 0.84 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 80 feet Truck Traffic Heavy
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 6 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 9
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.24 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 3 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 17.4

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 37

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Slauson Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Rosemead Blvd TO ECL (San Gabriel River Trail)

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/2/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:05 PM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 33-42 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 63,719
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Rosemead, Passons
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.96 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 80 feet Truck Traffic Heavy
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 6 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 27
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.40 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 4 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 12.8

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 38

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Telegraph Rd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM WCL (Bluff Rd) TO Rosemead Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/2/2026 85th Percentile Speed 45 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:35 PM 50th Percentile Speed 38 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph
10 mph Pace 36-45 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 45 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 38,094
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Paramount, Birchbark, Rosemead Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential
Length of Segment 1.18 miles Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Width 80 feet Truck Traffic Moderate
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 6 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.14 crashes/MVM

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 39

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Telegraph Rd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Rosemead Blvd TO ECL (San Gabriel River Trail)

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/2/2026 85th Percentile Speed 41 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:02 AM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 32-41 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 50,776
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Rosemead, Serapis, Passons, True Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Length of Segment 1.21 miles Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Width 78 feet Truck Traffic Moderate
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides, Many
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 6 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No Safety Factor per mile 0.25

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 40

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Tobias Ave CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Beverly Rd TO Beverly Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/3/2026 85th Percentile Speed 28 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:55 AM 50th Percentile Speed 24 mph Number of Survey Samples 171 Posted Speed Limit NP mph
10 mph Pace 18-27 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 663
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Beverly Rd, Beverly Blvd Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park
Length of Segment 0.17 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 30 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 2
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 1.76

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 41

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Washington Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM WCL (Bluff Rd) TO Rosemead Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/4/2026 85th Percentile Speed 43 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:43 PM 50th Percentile Speed 38 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 33-42 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 36,573
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Rosemead, Crossway, Paramount, Bluff Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Length of Segment 1.00 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 75 feet Truck Traffic Moderate
Horizontal Curve Yes Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Fair Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 6 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 15
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.37 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 0 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 0 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No Safety Factor per mile 0.3

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold No
Segment 42

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Washington Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Rosemead Blvd TO ECL (San Gabriel River Trail)

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 3/4/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 12:00 PM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 32-41 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 46,019
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Passons, Loch Alene, Rosemead Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential
Length of Segment 0.98 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 75 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Poor Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Number of Lanes 6
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 10
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.47 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.20 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 3 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 0 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 18.7

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 43

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Whittier Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM WCL (Van Norman Rd) TO Paramount Blvd

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/27/2026 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:30 AM 50th Percentile Speed 34 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
10 mph Pace 29-38 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 26,404
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Paramount, Myrtle
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Length of Segment 0.49 miles Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Width 53 feet Truck Traffic Moderate
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve Yes Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking None
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 18
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 1.27 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 1 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations No DUI 0 1 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 19

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
Segment 44

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT
STREET Whittier Blvd CERTIFICATION DATE Draft
FROM Paramount Blvd TO ECL (Esperanza Ave)

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/27/2026 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:01 AM 50th Percentile Speed 33 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
10 mph Pace 28-37 mph 2019 E&T Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 31,967
Date of ADT 2/10/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Esperanza, Gregg, Passons, Durfee, Lindsey, Rosemead, Acacia, Lexington, Paramount
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Length of Segment 1.19 miles Pedestrian Traffic Light
Width 82 feet Truck Traffic Light
Horizontal Curve No Lighting Both Sides
Vertical Curve No Driveways Both Sides
Roadway Conditions Good Visibility Good
Sidewalks Both Sides
On-Street Parking North Side Only
Number of Lanes 4 + Raised Median
CRASH HISTORY Total midblock crashes- all severities
Total Crashes 10
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.24 crashes/MVM

SAFETY CORRIDOR
KSI Crash History Date Range 1/1/2021-12/31/2025 Total midblock crashes- Fatal and Severe Injury KSI Crashes Total 6 Disadvantaged Community Yes Speed Related 1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Vulnerable Populations Yes DUI 0 4 School Zone No
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Safety Factor per mile 24.0

Draft TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crash History Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025
Safety Factor is greater than 0.75 Threshold Yes
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms
DATE: 02/27/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 3:37PM 4:10PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WCL AND ROSEMEAD BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 8804 BEVERLY BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X X 2 0 2
48 X X X 1 2 3
47 X X X X 2 2 4
46 X X X X 2 2 4
45 X X 1 1 2
44 X X X X X 4 1 5
43 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 85TH %: 43 42 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 50TH %: 38 38 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9
36 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 15TH %: 31 30 30 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 33 - 42 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *
32 X X X X X 1 4 5 P % IN PACE: 66% 67% 66%
31 X X X X X X 4 2 6 A
30 X X X X X 2 3 5 C % OVER PACE: 12% 10% 10%
29 X X X 1 2 3 E
28 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 * % UNDER PACE: 22% 23% 24%
27 X X X 2 1 3 *
26 X X X X 3 1 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X 3 2 5
24 X X 0 2 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 33 33
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.34 0.33 0.17
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.58 0.41 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

BEVERLY BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/05/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:31AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ROSEMEAD BLVD AND ECL 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF LINDSEY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X X X 1 2 3
49 X X X X 1 3 4
48 X X 0 2 2
47 X X X X 2 2 4
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X X X 1 3 4
44 X X X X 2 2 4
43 X X X 0 3 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 85TH %: 41 43 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6 20
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 50TH %: 38 38 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14
36 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 15TH %: 30 29 29 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X 7 1 8 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 34 - 43 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X 4 2 6 *
32 X X X X X X 2 4 6 P % IN PACE: 71% 54% 62%
31 X X X X X X 3 3 6 A
30 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 C % OVER PACE: 7% 15% 13%
29 X X X X X 2 3 5 E
28 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 * % UNDER PACE: 22% 31% 26%
27 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *
26 X X X X 2 2 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X 4 2 6
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 30 44 37
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 7 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.30 0.44 0.18
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.55 0.67 0.43 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

BEVERLY BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/03/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:03AM 10:17AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WCL AND ROSEMEAD BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF MARIS AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X 1 0 1
47 X X 0 2 2
46 X 1 0 1
45 X X 1 1 2
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X 1 1 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 X X 1 1 2
40 X X X X X 2 3 5 85TH %: 38 37 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 3 2 5
38 X X X X 3 1 4 50TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 15TH %: 29 28 28 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10 23 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8 20 P % IN PACE: 77% 75% 76% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 C % OVER PACE: 16% 12% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 * % UNDER PACE: 7% 13% 10% 27 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 *
26 X X X X X X 3 3 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 33 33 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X 2 3 5
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 23 23
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.23 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.48 0.34 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

BEVERLY ROAD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/03/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:25AM 11:47AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ROSEMEAD BLVD AND SAN GABRIEL RIVER PKWY 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 9343 BEVERLY RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 X 1 0 1
48 X 1 0 1
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X X X 2 1 3
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X 1 0 1
43 X X 1 1 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X 2 1 3
41 X X X X 1 3 4
40 X X X X X 2 3 5 85TH %: 39 39 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
38 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 50TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 15TH %: 29 30 29 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 30 - 39 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 P % IN PACE: 70% 73% 72% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 C % OVER PACE: 18% 13% 19% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 E
28 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 14% 10%
27 X X X X 3 1 4 *
26 X X X 1 2 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 35 34 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X 3 2 5
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28 23 25
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.23 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.48 0.36 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

BEVERLY ROAD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/09/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:55AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WHITTIER BLVD AND BEVERLY RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF STEPHENS ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X X X 1 2 3
40 X X 1 1 2 85TH %: 32 31 32 M.P.H.
39 X X 1 1 2
38 X X 2 0 2 50TH %: 27 26 26 M.P.H.
37 X X 1 1 2
36 X X 1 1 2 15TH %: 23 23 23 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 3 1 4 *
34 X X X 1 2 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 22 - 31 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 X X X 2 1 3 *
32 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 P % IN PACE: 75% 77% 76%
31 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 C % OVER PACE: 13% 15% 16% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 8% 9% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 27 27 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 11 21
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 11 21 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 23 23 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15
22 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8
20 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.23 0.11 19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.48 0.34 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

DURFEE AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/09/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 10:07AM 10:58AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BEVERLY RD AND GALLATIN RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4531 DURFEE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 30 29 30 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 26 26 26 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X X 1 1 2 15TH %: 22 22 22 M.P.H.
35 X X X 2 1 3 *
34 X X X 1 2 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 21 - 30 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 X X 1 1 2 *
32 X X X 2 1 3 P % IN PACE: 83% 84% 83%
31 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 C % OVER PACE: 7% 9% 7% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 7% 10% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 26 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 22
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15 14 14 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
20 X X X X X X 2 4 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.15 0.14 0.07 19 X X X X X 2 3 5
18 X X 2 0 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.37 0.27 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

DURFEE AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/06/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 2:20PM 4:07PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GALLATIN RD AND KRUSE RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3830 DURFEE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 0 0 0
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 32 30 31 M.P.H.
39 X X 1 1 2
38 X X X 1 2 3 50TH %: 26 24 25 M.P.H.
37 X X 1 1 2
36 X X X 1 2 3 15TH %: 22 21 21 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 3 1 4 *
34 X X X X 2 2 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 20 - 29 21 - 30 M.P.H. 33 X X X 2 1 3 *
32 X X X X 3 1 4 P % IN PACE: 75% 74% 74%
31 X X X X 2 2 4 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 C % OVER PACE: 18% 18% 16%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 * % UNDER PACE: 7% 8% 10% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7 20 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 25 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 12 18 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 26 26 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12
20 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.26 0.13 19 X X X 0 3 3
18 X X X X X X 1 5 6 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.51 0.36 M.P.H. 17 X X 2 0 2
16 X 1 0 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

DURFEE AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/10/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:32AM 12:32PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): CYPRESS POINT AND BRADGATE DR 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: MID-BLOCK
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X 0 1 1
40 X X X 2 1 3 85TH %: 31 33 33 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 1 3 4
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 26 26 26 M.P.H.
37 X X 1 1 2
36 X X 1 1 2 15TH %: 22 23 22 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 2 2 4 *
34 X X 1 1 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 22 - 31 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 X X X X 1 3 4 *
32 X X X X X 2 3 5 P % IN PACE: 72% 69% 70%
31 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 C % OVER PACE: 15% 22% 19% 29 X X X X X X 3 3 6 E
28 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 9% 11%
27 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 28 27 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 29 28 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12
22 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X 3 3 6
20 X X X X 3 1 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.37 0.18
19 X X X X X 2 3 5
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.61 0.61 0.43 M.P.H.
17 X 1 0 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
71 78 149
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

FAIRWAY DRIVE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/05/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:15AM 11:27AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PARAMOUNT BLVD AND ROSEMEAD BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 8842 GALLATIN RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 X X 0 2 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X 1 0 1
40 X X 1 1 2 85TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 2 2 4
38 X X X 1 2 3 50TH %: 29 30 29 M.P.H.
37 X X X 2 1 3
36 X X X X X 2 3 5 15TH %: 23 24 23 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 3 1 4 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 25 - 34 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 P % IN PACE: 66% 68% 67% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 22 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 C % OVER PACE: 14% 13% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 19% 20% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 29 29 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12
24 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 30 29 30
23 X X X X 3 1 4
22 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X 5 2 7
20 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.30 0.29 0.15 19 X X X 2 1 3
18 X 0 1 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.55 0.54 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

GALLATIN ROAD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 02/27/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 9:50AM 11:19AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WHITTIER BLVD AND PASSONS BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 9330 JACKSON ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 27 28 27 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 23 24 23 M.P.H.
37 X 1 0 1
36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 17 18 18 M.P.H.
35 X X 0 2 2 *
34 X 1 0 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 17 - 26 18 - 27 18 - 27 M.P.H. 33 X X X 2 1 3 *
32 X X 1 1 2 P % IN PACE: 72% 77% 74%
31 X X X X 1 3 4 A
30 X X X 2 1 3 C % OVER PACE: 19% 15% 14%
29 X X X X X 3 2 5 E
28 X X X X X X 2 4 6 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 8% 12%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 23 23 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 22 21 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
20 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.21 0.11 19 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14
18 X X X X X X X X X X 2 8 10 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.46 0.33 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X X X X 7 1 8
16 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
15 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

JACKSON STREET
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/09/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 11:01AM 1:01PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): NARROWS DR AND DURFEE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 9441 KRUSE RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 28 29 29 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 24 24 24 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X X X 2 1 3 15TH %: 20 20 20 M.P.H.
35 X 0 1 1 *
34 X X 1 1 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 19 - 28 20 - 29 19 - 28 M.P.H. 33 X X X X 1 3 4 *
32 X X 1 1 2 P % IN PACE: 79% 76% 77%
31 X X X 2 1 3 A
30 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 C % OVER PACE: 15% 14% 16%
29 X X X X 2 2 4 E
28 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 * % UNDER PACE: 7% 10% 7%
27 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 25 25 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 22
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17 22 19 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10
20 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.24 0.11 19 X X X X X 3 2 5
18 X X X X X X 2 4 6 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.49 0.33 M.P.H. 17 X X X X 3 1 4
16 X 0 1 1
15 X X 1 1 2
89 91 180
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

KRUSE ROAD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/05/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 11:38AM 1:38PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): VAN NORMAN RD AND PARAMOUNT BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 8467 LOCH LOMOND DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X X 2 0 2 85TH %: 35 32 33 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 2 3 5
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 27 26 27 M.P.H.
37 X 1 0 1
36 X X X X X 4 1 5 15TH %: 22 21 22 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
34 X 0 1 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 23 - 32 23 - 32 M.P.H. 33 X X X X 3 1 4 *
32 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 P % IN PACE: 66% 66% 64%
31 X X X X X 4 1 5 A
30 X X X X X 2 3 5 C % OVER PACE: 24% 13% 17%
29 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 21% 18% 27 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 *
26 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 27 27 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31 30 30 23 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8
22 X X X X X X 4 2 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X 1 4 5
20 X X X 1 2 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.44 0.22
19 X X X X X X 3 3 6
18 X X X 1 2 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.66 0.67 0.47 M.P.H. 17 X 1 0 1
16 X 0 1 1
15 0 0 0
71 67 138
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

LOCH LOMOND DRIVE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/05/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 1:49PM 3:10PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PARAMOUNT BLVD AND ROSEMEAD BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 8729 MINES AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 X X X X 0 4 4
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X X X X X 2 3 5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X 1 0 1
41 X X X 1 2 3
40 X X X X X X 2 4 6 85TH %: 38 39 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 50TH %: 34 35 35 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8 20 15TH %: 28 30 29 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 P % IN PACE: 74% 74% 74%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 C % OVER PACE: 8% 14% 11% 29 X X X X X X 3 3 6 E
28 X X X X X X 4 2 6 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 12% 15%
27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X X X X 4 1 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 35 34 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X 4 2 6
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 23 22
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.23 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.48 0.33 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

MINES AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/06/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 10:07AM 11:59AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ROSEMEAD BLVD AND PASSONS BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 9313 MINES AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X 0 1 1
44 X 1 0 1
43 X X 1 1 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X 1 3 4
41 X X X 2 1 3
40 X X X X X X X X X 8 1 9 85TH %: 38 36 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 2 2 4
38 X X X X X 3 2 5 50TH %: 31 31 31 M.P.H.
37 X X X 1 2 3
36 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 15TH %: 25 24 25 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 *
34 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 P % IN PACE: 61% 65% 63% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 C % OVER PACE: 19% 24% 27% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 E
28 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 11% 10%
27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 30 31 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10
24 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 31 31
23 X X X X 2 2 4
22 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X 3 2 5
20 X X X 1 2 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.31 0.16
19 X 0 1 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.56 0.40 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

MINES AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/06/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 12:08PM 2:08PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PASSONS BLVD AND RIMBANK AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 9607 MINES AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X X X 0 3 3 85TH %: 31 33 32 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 X X 1 1 2 50TH %: 27 26 26 M.P.H.
37 X 1 0 1
36 X X 1 1 2 15TH %: 23 22 22 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 2 2 4 *
34 X X X X 3 1 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 22 - 31 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 1 4 5 *
32 X X X X 3 1 4 P % IN PACE: 76% 70% 73%
31 X X X X X 2 3 5 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 C % OVER PACE: 15% 17% 16%
29 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 13% 11% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 27 27 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 28 23 23 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
22 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X 1 2 3
20 X X X X X X 3 3 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.34 0.14 19 X X X X X 2 3 5
18 X X X X 1 3 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.58 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
78 82 160
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

MINES AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/09/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 1:15PM 3:15PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SANDOVAL AVE AND KRUSE RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 9340 NARROWS DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 30 28 29 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 25 23 24 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 22 20 20 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 0 0 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 19 - 28 20 - 29 M.P.H.
33 X 1 0 1 *
32 X X 1 1 2 P % IN PACE: 86% 83% 80%
31 X X X 2 1 3 A
30 X X X X X 4 1 5 C % OVER PACE: 5% 14% 14%
29 X X X X 2 2 4 E
28 X X X X 3 1 4 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 3% 6%
27 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
26 X X X X X X 4 2 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 24 25 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10
24 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 12 14 13
23 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10
22 X X X X X X 3 3 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X 1 4 5
20 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.27 0.39 0.17 19 X X X X 1 3 4
18 X 0 1 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.63 0.41 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
44 36 80
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

NARROWS DRIVE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 02/27/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 12:09PM 2:09PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PINE ST AND ORANGE ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF FIR ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 26 30 27 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 24 25 25 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 18 19 19 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 X 0 1 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 19 - 28 19 - 28 19 - 28 M.P.H. 33 X 0 1 1 *
32 X X X 1 2 3 P % IN PACE: 81% 75% 78%
31 X X 0 2 2 A
30 X X X 1 2 3 C % OVER PACE: 4% 14% 9%
29 X 0 1 1 E
28 X X X X X 1 4 5 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 11% 13%
27 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 24 24 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6 18
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15 20 18 23 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
22 X X X X X X 1 5 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X 3 2 5
20 X X X 1 2 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.27 0.30 0.15
19 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
18 X X X 1 2 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.54 0.39 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X 3 2 5
16 X X 2 0 2
15 X X X X X 2 3 5
54 63 117
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/02/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 9:39AM 11:13AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): FLORPARK ST AND SHADE LN 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 8234 ORANGEAVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 26 27 26 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 23 23 23 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 19 18 19 M.P.H.
35 X X 0 2 2 *
34 X 1 0 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 17 - 26 17 - 26 M.P.H. 33 X 0 1 1 *
32 X X 1 1 2 P % IN PACE: 87% 79% 83%
31 X X X X X 2 3 5 A
30 X X 1 1 2 C % OVER PACE: 8% 15% 13%
29 X X X 1 2 3 E
28 X X X X X 2 3 5 * % UNDER PACE: 5% 6% 5%
27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 18 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 23 23 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 13 30 24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10 24 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 19 16 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6 17
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16
20 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.13 0.19 0.08 19 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10
18 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.44 0.28 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8
16 X X X X X X 2 4 6
15 X X X 1 2 3
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

ORANGE AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 02/26/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:31AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): TELEGRAPH RD AND SLAUSON AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF MAXINE ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 X X 1 1 2
50 X X X 1 2 3
49 X X X X 3 1 4
48 X X X X X 1 4 5
47 X 0 1 1
46 X X 0 2 2
45 X X X 2 1 3
44 0 0 0
43 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X 5 1 6
41 X X X X X X 1 5 6
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9 21 85TH %: 42 43 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 50TH %: 37 38 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15
36 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 15TH %: 31 32 32 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 32 - 41 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 *
32 X X X X X X 3 3 6 P % IN PACE: 71% 68% 70%
31 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 A
30 X X X X X X 4 2 6 C % OVER PACE: 18% 18% 21%
29 X X X X X 2 3 5 E
28 X 0 1 1 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 14% 10%
27 X X X X 3 1 4 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 38 37 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 X X 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 29 34 31
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.34 0.16
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.58 0.39 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 02/26/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:37AM 10:03AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SLAUSON AVE AND WASHINGTON BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF TROJAN ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X X 0 2 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X 1 0 1
50 X X X 1 2 3
49 X X X X 3 1 4
48 X X X X X X 5 1 6
47 X X X X 2 2 4
46 X X X X X 4 1 5
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 18 85TH %: 46 44 45 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 14 23 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 50TH %: 41 40 40 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12
36 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 15TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
34 X X X X X 3 2 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 36 - 45 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 X X 1 1 2 *
32 X X X 2 1 3 P % IN PACE: 70% 77% 73%
31 X X 1 1 2 A
30 X X X X 2 2 4 C % OVER PACE: 14% 9% 14%
29 X X X X 2 2 4 E
28 X X 1 1 2 * % UNDER PACE: 16% 14% 14%
27 X 0 1 1 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 41 40 40 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 29 24 27
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.24 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.49 0.36 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 02/26/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:10AM 10:40AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WASHINGTON BLVD AND MINES AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF CARRON DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X 0 1 1
50 X X X 1 2 3
49 X X X 2 1 3
48 X X X X 1 3 4
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X X 2 0 2
45 X X X X X X 1 5 6
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X X X X 3 2 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 13 23 85TH %: 42 43 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 13 24 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 50TH %: 38 39 39 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
36 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 15TH %: 32 33 33 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 *
32 X X X X X X 5 1 6 P % IN PACE: 68% 73% 71%
31 X X X X X 2 3 5 A
30 X X 1 1 2 C % OVER PACE: 12% 16% 16%
29 X X X 1 2 3 E
28 X X X X 3 1 4 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 11% 14%
27 X X X X 2 2 4 *
26 X X 2 0 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 38 38 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 27 29
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.27 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.57 0.52 0.38 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 02/26/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:48AM 11:23AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MINES AVE AND WHITTIER BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 5608 PARAMOUNT BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 X 1 0 1 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 0 1 1
50 X X 2 0 2
49 X X X X 1 3 4
48 X 0 1 1
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X X X 1 2 3
45 X X X X 3 1 4
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X X X X 2 2 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X 1 4 5
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 85TH %: 41 42 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7 21 50TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 15TH %: 33 31 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 *
34 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 *
32 X X X X X 2 3 5 P % IN PACE: 75% 63% 69%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 A
30 X X X X X 3 2 5 C % OVER PACE: 13% 13% 13%
29 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 E
28 X X 1 1 2 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 24% 19%
27 X X 0 2 2 *
26 X 0 1 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
25 X X X X 0 4 4
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 36 31
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.36 0.16
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.60 0.39 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 02/26/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 11:31AM 12:09PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WHITTIER BLVD AND BEVERLY BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4660 PARAMOUNT BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X X 0 2 2
50 X X X X 2 2 4
49 X 0 1 1
48 X X X X 3 1 4
47 0 0 0
46 X X X X 1 3 4
45 X X X 2 1 3
44 X X 0 2 2
43 X X 1 1 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 13 21 85TH %: 41 42 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 50TH %: 37 39 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8 20
36 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 15TH %: 31 34 32 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X 7 1 8 P % IN PACE: 70% 77% 73%
31 X X X X 3 1 4 A
30 X X X X X 3 2 5 C % OVER PACE: 15% 13% 12%
29 X X X X X 3 2 5 E
28 X X X X X X 5 1 6 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 10% 16%
27 X X 1 1 2 *
26 X 0 1 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 38 38 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28 26 27
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.26 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.51 0.37 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 02/27/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 2:24PM 3:28PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BEVERLY BLVD AND GALLATIN RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF IBSEN ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X X 2 0 2
44 X 1 0 1
43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X 0 2 2
41 X X X 1 2 3
40 X X X 2 1 3 85TH %: 35 36 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X 1 2 3
38 X X X 0 3 3 50TH %: 31 32 32 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 2 3 5
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 15TH %: 26 26 26 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 P % IN PACE: 76% 72% 74% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 C % OVER PACE: 15% 13% 12% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 15% 15% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 32 32 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X 2 3 5
24 X X X X X 3 2 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 22 23
23 X X X X X 3 2 5
22 X X X 0 3 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.22 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.47 0.34 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/06/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 9:02AM 9:57AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SLAUSON AVE AND WASHINGTON BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF CANFORD ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 X 0 1 1
40 X X 0 2 2 85TH %: 31 31 31 M.P.H.
39 X X 1 1 2
38 X X X 1 2 3 50TH %: 25 26 26 M.P.H.
37 X X X 2 1 3
36 X X X 2 1 3 15TH %: 21 22 21 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 1 3 4 *
34 X X X 2 1 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 X X X 2 1 3 *
32 X X X X X 3 2 5 P % IN PACE: 70% 72% 71%
31 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 A
30 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 C % OVER PACE: 18% 25% 24%
29 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 3% 6% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 27 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27 27 27 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10
20 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.27 0.27 0.14 19 X X X X 3 1 4
18 X X X X 3 1 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.52 0.37 M.P.H. 17 X X X 2 1 3
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

PASSONS BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
DATE: 03/04/26 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 12:42PM 1:35PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WASHINGTON BLVD AND MINES AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 6110 PASSONS BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 30 29 29 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X X 1 1 2 50TH %: 26 25 25 M.P.H.
37 X X X 2 1 3
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 21 22 22 M.P.H.
35 X X 1 1 2 *
34 X X X 2 1 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 21 - 30 21 - 30 M.P.H. 33 X X X 1 2 3 *
32 X X X X X 2 3 5 P % IN PACE: 79% 84% 82%
31 X X 1 1 2 A
30 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 C % OVER PACE: 12% 10% 11%
29 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 6% 8% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12 25 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 26 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 14 26 24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 13 23 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 15 18 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17
22 X X X X X X X X X X 2 8 10 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11
20 X X X X 2 2 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.15 0.09
19 X X 1 1 2
18 X X X X X 3 2 5 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.39 0.30 M.P.H. 17 X X 1 1 2
16 X X 2 0 2
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

PASSONS BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/05/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 3:13PM 4:09PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MINES AVE AND WHITTIER BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 5135 PASSONS BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X X 0 2 2 85TH %: 29 31 31 M.P.H.
39 X X 1 1 2
38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %: 25 26 25 M.P.H.
37 X X X 1 2 3
36 X X 1 1 2 15TH %: 21 22 22 M.P.H.
35 X X X 1 2 3 *
34 X X X X X 2 3 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 20 - 29 22 - 31 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 X X 1 1 2 *
32 X X X X 2 2 4 P % IN PACE: 80% 74% 76%
31 X X X X X 1 4 5 A
30 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 C % OVER PACE: 15% 15% 20%
29 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 * % UNDER PACE: 5% 11% 5% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 27 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9 23 24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 25 23 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9
20 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.20 0.25 0.11 19 X X X X X 4 1 5
18 X X X 1 2 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.50 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 X 0 1 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

PASSONS BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/04/26 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 2:19PM 3:09PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PARAMOUNT BLVD AND ROSEMEAD BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: MID-BLOCK
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 X X 2 0 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X 1 2 3
41 X X 1 1 2
40 X X X X 2 2 4 85TH %: 35 37 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 0 5 5
38 X X X X X 3 2 5 50TH %: 30 32 31 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8
36 X X X X X X 1 5 6 15TH %: 22 27 24 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 27 - 36 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 P % IN PACE: 59% 68% 62% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 C % OVER PACE: 13% 18% 18% 29 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 * % UNDER PACE: 28% 14% 20% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 *
26 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 32 31 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
24 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 39 25 33
23 X X X X X 2 3 5
22 X X X X 3 1 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 X X X X 4 0 4
20 X X 2 0 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.25 0.17
19 X X X X 3 1 4
18 X X X 2 1 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.50 0.41 M.P.H. 17 X 1 0 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

REX ROAD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/02/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 3:46PM 4:17PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): TELEGRAPH RD AND WASHINGTON BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SOUTH OF DANBRIDGE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 X X X 1 2 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X X 2 0 2
50 X X X X 1 3 4
49 X X 1 1 2
48 X X X X X 2 3 5
47 X X X 1 2 3
46 X X 1 1 2
45 X X X X 3 1 4
44 X X X X 2 2 4
43 X X X X X X 3 3 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X 1 4 5
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21 85TH %: 43 44 44 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 50TH %: 37 38 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 15TH %: 29 31 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 *
34 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 34 - 43 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 P % IN PACE: 56% 61% 59%
31 X X X X X X 4 2 6 A
30 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 C % OVER PACE: 19% 17% 22%
29 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 E
28 X X X X 2 2 4 * % UNDER PACE: 25% 22% 20%
27 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 *
26 X X X 3 0 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 38 38 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 X X 2 0 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 46 41 44
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 6 7 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.41 0.22
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.68 0.64 0.47 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/04/26 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 3:18PM 3:47PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WASHINGTON BLVD AND WHITTIER BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF MANZANAR AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X X X X 2 2 4
49 X 1 0 1
48 X X X X X 3 2 5
47 X X X X 1 3 4
46 X X X X 2 2 4
45 X X 1 1 2
44 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
43 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 85TH %: 43 43 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 50TH %: 39 38 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 15TH %: 32 30 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X 4 2 6 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 34 - 43 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 4 1 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 P % IN PACE: 64% 61% 62%
31 X X X X X X 4 2 6 A
30 X X X X X X 2 4 6 C % OVER PACE: 11% 14% 15%
29 X X X X X 3 2 5 E
28 X X X X X X 2 4 6 * % UNDER PACE: 25% 25% 24%
27 X X X 0 3 3 *
26 X X 1 1 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 37 38 M.P.H.
25 X X 0 2 2
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 39 36
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.39 0.18
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.57 0.63 0.42 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/05/26 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:40AM 10:07AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WHITTIER BLVD AND GALLATIN RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4101 ROSEMEAD BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X X 1 1 2
50 X X 0 2 2
49 X X X 2 1 3
48 X X X 1 2 3
47 X X X X 1 3 4
46 X X X X 2 2 4
45 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8
44 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10
43 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 85TH %: 43 45 44 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
38 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 50TH %: 38 40 39 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 15TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 *
34 X X X X X 2 3 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 36 - 45 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 4 1 5 *
32 X X X X 1 3 4 P % IN PACE: 59% 54% 57%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 A
30 X X X X X X 2 4 6 C % OVER PACE: 8% 12% 10%
29 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 E
28 X X X 2 1 3 * % UNDER PACE: 33% 34% 34%
27 X X X 1 2 3 *
26 X X X X X 3 2 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 38 38 M.P.H.
25 X X X X 1 3 4
24 X X X 2 1 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 41 50 45
23 X X 0 2 2
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 7 7 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.50 0.23
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.71 0.48 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/03/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:03PM 3:02PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BEVERLY BLVD AND WHITTIER PUMPING PLANT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4303 SAN GABRIEL RIVER PKWY 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 X X 2 0 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X 0 2 2
51 X X 1 1 2
50 X X X X X 2 3 5
49 X X X X X 3 2 5
48 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
47 X X X X X X 3 3 6
46 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12
40 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 85TH %: 46 47 46 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
38 X X X 1 2 3 50TH %: 42 42 42 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 2 2 4
36 X X X X X 1 4 5 15TH %: 31 32 32 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 3 1 4 *
34 X X X X X X 3 3 6 * 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 39 - 48 39 - 48 M.P.H. 33 X X X 1 2 3 *
32 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 P % IN PACE: 60% 62% 61%
31 X X X X X 3 2 5 A
30 X X X X X X 2 4 6 C % OVER PACE: 8% 9% 9%
29 X X X X X 4 1 5 E
28 X X X 1 2 3 * % UNDER PACE: 32% 29% 31%
27 X X X 1 2 3 *
26 X X X X 3 1 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40 41 40 M.P.H.
25 X X X 3 0 3
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 49 41 45
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 6 7 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.41 0.23
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.70 0.64 0.48 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

SAN GABRIEL RIVER PARKWAY
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/03/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 3:09PM 4:04PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WHITTIER PUMPING PLANT AND SPRINGLAND DR 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF CYPRESS POINT DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 0 1 1
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X 2 0 2
51 X 0 1 1
50 X X X 2 1 3
49 X X X X X X 4 2 6
48 X X X X X X 3 3 6
47 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13
41 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
40 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 85TH %: 46 46 46 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12
38 X X X X X 2 3 5 50TH %: 42 41 42 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 3 2 5
36 X X X X X X X 1 6 7 15TH %: 32 33 32 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *
34 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 40 - 49 39 - 48 39 - 48 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 *
32 X X X X 2 2 4 P % IN PACE: 56% 59% 58%
31 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 A
30 X X X X X 2 3 5 C % OVER PACE: 4% 6% 7%
29 X X 1 1 2 E
28 X X X X X X 4 2 6 * % UNDER PACE: 40% 35% 36%
27 X X X X X 4 1 5 *
26 X 0 1 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40 40 40 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 45 39 42
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.39 0.21
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.67 0.62 0.46 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

SAN GABRIEL RIVER PARKWAY
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/10/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:30AM 10:21AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPRINGLAND DR AND ROSE HILL RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3535 SAN GABRIEL RIVER PKWY 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X 0 1 1
50 X X X X X X 4 2 6
49 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
48 X X X X X 2 3 5
47 X X X X X 1 4 5
46 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
43 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
41 X X X X X 4 1 5
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 85TH %: 45 46 46 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X 3 2 5
38 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 50TH %: 38 40 40 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X 3 3 6
36 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 15TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 *
34 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 40 - 49 37 - 46 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 P % IN PACE: 49% 51% 48%
31 X X X X 1 3 4 A
30 X X X X X X 4 2 6 C % OVER PACE: 14% 4% 13%
29 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 E
28 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 * % UNDER PACE: 37% 45% 40%
27 X X 1 1 2 *
26 X X X 1 2 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 39 39 M.P.H.
25 X X X X 2 2 4
24 X X X 2 1 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 49 55 52
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 7 7 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.55 0.26
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.70 0.74 0.51 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

SAN GABRIEL RIVER PARKWAY
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/02/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 11:23AM 1:23PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): TELEGRAPH RD AND PERKINS ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 8503 SERAPIS AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 26 27 27 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 22 24 23 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X 1 0 1 15TH %: 17 18 18 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 X 1 0 1 * 10 MPH PACE: 19 - 28 18 - 27 18 - 27 M.P.H. 33 X 0 1 1 *
32 X 0 1 1 P % IN PACE: 74% 81% 77%
31 X X X X X 2 3 5 A
30 X 1 0 1 C % OVER PACE: 11% 13% 13%
29 X X 0 2 2 E
28 X X 1 1 2 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 6% 10%
27 X X X X X 1 4 5 *
26 X X X X X 2 3 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 23 23 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 17 19 23 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11
22 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
20 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.26 0.18 19 X X X X 3 1 4
18 X X X X X X 0 6 6 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.72 0.51 0.42 M.P.H. 17 X X 1 1 2
16 X X X 2 1 3
15 X X X X X X 4 2 6
46 63 109
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

SERAPIS AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/02/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 2:20PM 2:52PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WCL AND ROSEMEAD BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 8640 SLAUSON AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X 0 1 1
50 X 0 1 1
49 X 0 1 1
48 X 1 0 1
47 X X X X 2 2 4
46 X 1 0 1
45 X X X X 0 4 4
44 X X X 1 2 3
43 X X X X X 2 3 5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 85TH %: 41 42 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 50TH %: 36 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 15TH %: 29 31 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 34 - 43 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
32 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 P % IN PACE: 65% 66% 66%
31 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 A
30 X X X X X 2 3 5 C % OVER PACE: 7% 11% 9%
29 X X X X X 3 2 5 E
28 X X X X X 4 1 5 * % UNDER PACE: 28% 23% 26%
27 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
26 X X X X 3 1 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 37 37 M.P.H.
25 X X X X 3 1 4
24 X X 0 2 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 33 33
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.34 0.33 0.17
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.58 0.41 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

SLAUSON AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/02/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 3:05PM 3:39PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ROSEMEAD BLVD AND ECL 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 9040 SLAUSON AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X X 1 1 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X 1 1 2
51 X X 2 0 2
50 X X X 2 1 3
49 X 1 0 1
48 X X X 2 1 3
47 X X X 2 1 3
46 X 1 0 1
45 X X X X 3 1 4
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X X X 1 3 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 85TH %: 44 41 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 50TH %: 38 36 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 15TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 32 - 41 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 *
32 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 P % IN PACE: 62% 64% 63%
31 X X X X X X 3 3 6 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 C % OVER PACE: 18% 14% 14% 29 X X X X X 2 3 5 E
28 X X X X 2 2 4 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 22% 24%
27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X 1 1 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 36 37 M.P.H.
25 X X X X 0 4 4
24 X X X 2 1 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 42 34 39
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.34 0.19
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.65 0.59 0.44 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

SLAUSON AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/02/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 1:35PM 2:08PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WCL AND ROSEMEAD BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 8286 TELEGRAPH RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X 1 0 1
50 X X X X 1 3 4
49 X X X X 3 1 4
48 X X 1 1 2
47 X X X 1 2 3
46 X X X 0 3 3
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12
43 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17
41 X X X X X X X 6 1 7
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 85TH %: 44 45 45 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 50TH %: 40 37 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 15TH %: 33 28 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X 1 3 4 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 36 - 45 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *
32 X X X X X X 1 5 6 P % IN PACE: 65% 46% 56%
31 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 C % OVER PACE: 8% 10% 9%
29 X X X X X 1 4 5 E
28 X X X X X X 3 3 6 * % UNDER PACE: 27% 44% 36%
27 X X X X X 1 4 5 *
26 X X X 0 3 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 37 38 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X 1 4 5
24 X X 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 36 49 43
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 7 7 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.36 0.49 0.22
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.60 0.70 0.47 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

TELEGRAPH ROAD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/02/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 9:02AM 9:28AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ROSEMEAD BLVD AND ECL 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 9425 TELEGRAPH RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 1 0 1
48 0 0 0
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X 0 1 1
43 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8 21 85TH %: 41 41 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 50TH %: 37 36 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 15TH %: 31 29 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 P % IN PACE: 72% 66% 68%
31 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 A
30 X X X X X X 3 3 6 C % OVER PACE: 3% 11% 12%
29 X X X X X 2 3 5 E
28 X X X 1 2 3 * % UNDER PACE: 25% 23% 20%
27 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *
26 X X X X 1 3 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 35 36 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X 3 2 5
24 X X 0 2 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 30 27
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.30 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.55 0.37 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

TELEGRAPH ROAD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/03/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 11:55AM 1:55PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BEVERLY RD AND BEVERLY BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF BARTOLO AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 27 28 28 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 23 24 24 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 19 19 19 M.P.H.
35 X X 1 1 2 *
34 X X X X 1 3 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 19 - 28 18 - 27 M.P.H. 33 X X 2 0 2 *
32 X 0 1 1 P % IN PACE: 82% 74% 77%
31 X X X X 1 3 4 A
30 X X X X X 2 3 5 C % OVER PACE: 16% 14% 19%
29 X X X X X 4 1 5 E
28 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 12% 4%
27 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 24 24 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 21 18 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10
20 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.22 0.11 19 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
18 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.47 0.33 M.P.H. 17 X X X X 2 2 4
16 X X 0 2 2
15 X 0 1 1
77 94 171
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

TOBIAS AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/04/26 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 1:43PM 2:09PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WCL AND ROSEMEAD BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF PHAETON AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 1 0 1
50 X X X X X 3 2 5
49 X X X X 3 1 4
48 X X X 1 2 3
47 X 0 1 1
46 X X X X X 4 1 5
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X X X X X 3 3 6 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9
41 X X X X X X X X X X 2 8 10
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 85TH %: 43 41 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 50TH %: 38 37 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 15TH %: 32 31 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 32 - 41 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 *
32 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 P % IN PACE: 64% 68% 66%
31 X X X X X 2 3 5 A
30 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 C % OVER PACE: 15% 15% 16%
29 X X X 1 2 3 E
28 X X X 2 1 3 * % UNDER PACE: 21% 17% 19%
27 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *
26 X X 1 1 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 37 37 M.P.H.
25 X X 1 1 2
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 36 33 34
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.36 0.33 0.17
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.60 0.57 0.41 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 03/04/26 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 12:00PM 12:34PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ROSEMEAD BLVD AND ECL 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF BEQUETTE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X 1 0 1
50 X 1 0 1
49 X X X X 1 3 4
48 X 0 1 1
47 X X X 1 2 3
46 X X X 1 2 3
45 X X X X 2 2 4
44 X X X X 1 3 4
43 X X X X 2 2 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X 3 1 4
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 85TH %: 41 43 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 50TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11
36 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 15TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 P % IN PACE: 66% 60% 63%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 C % OVER PACE: 14% 17% 16%
29 X X X X X X 3 3 6 E
28 X X X X 3 1 4 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 23% 22%
27 X X X X 2 2 4 *
26 X X X X X 3 2 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 37 37 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 X X 0 2 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 38 35
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.38 0.17
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.62 0.42 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 02/27/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 11:30AM 11:59AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WCL AND PARAMOUNT BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 8465 WHITTIER BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X X 0 2 2
43 X X 1 1 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X X 1 1 2
40 X X X 1 2 3 85TH %: 37 38 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 2 4 6
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 50TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9 22 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 P % IN PACE: 81% 73% 77% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 C % OVER PACE: 6% 13% 10% 29 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 E
28 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 14% 14%
27 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
26 X X X 2 1 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
25 X X X X 1 3 4
24 X X 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 26 21
23 X X X 1 2 3
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.26 0.10
19 X 0 1 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.51 0.32 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

WHITTIER BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE: 02/27/26 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD: 9:01AM 9:40AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PARAMOUNT BLVD AND ECL 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 9450 WHITTIER BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 X X 1 1 2
45 X X X 2 1 3
44 X X X 1 2 3
43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X 1 1 2
41 X X X 2 1 3
40 X X X X 2 2 4 85TH %: 38 37 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X 1 2 3
38 X X X X X X X 6 1 7 50TH %: 34 33 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 15TH %: 28 28 28 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 P % IN PACE: 73% 75% 73% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 C % OVER PACE: 11% 12% 15% 29 X X X X X 3 2 5 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * % UNDER PACE: 16% 13% 13% 27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 33 33 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X 2 3 5
24 X X X 1 2 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23 25 24
23 X X X 1 2 3
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.23 0.25 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.48 0.50 0.35 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

WHITTIER BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF PICO RIVERA

APPENDIX C
ADT Count Sheets

Page 1 ends

Pico Rivera City CouncilJune 23, 2026

Pico Rivera City Council
June 23, 2026