Project Origin : Priority Score : 27
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 70,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 $
6/30/2026
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 70,000 $ 70,000
$ - $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000
$ 70,000 $ 70,000
$ - $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000
PA2402 - MURAL PRESERVATION
Functional Area : Parks Council Request
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Description
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Estimated Expenditures To-Date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2025 Estimated Completion
DesignPreservation and enhancment of murals in the City History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal CC.1, Policy CC.1.3; Goal CC.5, Policy CC.5.1
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
TOTAL FUNDS
ConstructionContingency
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)276 - Growth Impact Fees
19
Project Origin : Priority Score : 24
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 400,000 100,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 $
6/30/2026
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 70,000 $ 5,000 $ 75,000$ 30,000 $ 360,000 $ 360,000 $ 750,000 $ 35,000 $ 40,000 $ 75,000
$ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000$ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 900,000 TOTAL FUNDS $ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 ConstructionContingency
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)276 - Growth Impact FeesDesignRenovations to the baseball field to decrease water and energy usage and increase accessibility and safety.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1, Policy CS.1.3; Goal CS.3, Policy CS.3.1; Goal CS.9, Policy CS.9.1, Goal SE.4, Policy SE.4.2 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
Description
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Estimated Expenditures To-Date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
PA2401 - FERNANDEZ PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Functional Area : Parks Staff Recommendation
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
20
Project Origin : Priority Score : 34
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ 150,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ - $ 135,000 $ 135,000$ - $ 15,000 $ 15,000$ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000$ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000$ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Parks
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyGoal CS.2, Goal CS.3, Policy CS 2.6 & 3.1, Policy GM.4.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The ramps at the skatepark have settled and need to be replaced.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
PA2202 - SKATEPARK REHABILITATION
Council Request
TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014
TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
21
Project Origin : Priority Score : 33
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 200,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 180,000 $ 180,000
$ 20,000 $ 20,000
$ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000$ 200,000 $ 200,000$ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Parks
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyGoal CS.1, Goal CS.3, Policy CS 3.1, Policy GM.4.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
There are two soccer fields at Pinole Valley Park which are utilized on an annual basis, the Wright Avenue Soccer Field at the southerly end, and Savage Avenue Soccer Field at the northern end. Both fields are heavily used by soccer leagues and the general public. The Savage Avenue Soccer Field requires substantial rehabilitation which includes: upgrading the irrigation system and ongoing turf maintenance. Turf maintenance includes mowing, fertilizing, aeration, overseeding, and topdressing.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
This project has been delayed pending the development of a Park Master Plan (CIP Project# SS2401).
General Plan Goals/Policies
PA1901 - PINOLE VALLEY PARK SOCCER FIELD REHABILITATION Council Request
TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)276 - Growth Impact Fees
TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
22
Project Origin : Priority Score :
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $
6/30/2029
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 SS2407 - PRIVATE SEWER LATERAL PROGRAM
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer Staff Recommendation
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Description
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Estimated Expenditures To-Date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
DesignRevolving fund to complete private sewer lateral improvements under a reimbursement agreement with residents.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
This program will support the City's sewer collection system and treatment plant regulatory compliance through a reduction in flows from infiltration and inflow (I&I). I&I reduction will reduce treatment costs and may reduce the scope of or need for future capacity improvements.
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goals HS.2, Policy HS.2.5; Goal HS.7, Policy HS.7.6; Goal CC.2, Policy CC.2.2 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
TOTAL FUNDS
ConstructionContingency
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
23
Project Origin : Priority Score : 56
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ ‐ ‐ $ 175,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 175,000 $ 6/30/2028
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $ 10,000 10,000 $
$ 165,000 165,000 $
$ ‐ ‐ $ 175,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 175,000 $ $ ‐ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ 175,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 175,000 $ Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal SE.3, Policy SE.1.3; Goal CS.7, Policy CS.7.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1USE(S)Planning TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
SOURCE(S)500 ‐ Sewer Enterprise FundPlanning and design for renewable solar energy generation and battery storage project at the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP). Install three (3) photovoltaic (PV) arrays with a total PV capacity of 496 kW: a carport array (50‐ kW), a ground‐mount PV array in the public park area to the southwest of the WPCP (175‐kW), and a ground‐mount PV array along the northeast perimeter of the WPCP, adjacent to the public pathway that runs along the canal (271‐kW). Install a 575 kWh capacity battery energy storage system (BESS), controls, and a 450‐kW diesel generator.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
In 2024, Tetra Tech prepared an Energy Conservation, Generation, and Storage Assessment study for City facilities which included: 1) evaluation of energy conservation, energy generation, energy storage, and electric vehicle measures and 2) a renewable microgrid analysis to determine the technical and economic feasibility of installing new renewable energy generation systems and battery storage at the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP). Recommendations included addition of photovoltaic (PV) panel arrays at three different locations, a battery energy storage system (BESS) and generator. Construction would be completed outside of the 5‐year budget window.
General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Start 7/1/2026 Estimated Completion
Description
SS2406 ‐ WPCP SOLAR AND BATTERY
Master Plan
DesignConstructionContingency
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Estimated Expenditures to‐date
24
Project Origin : Priority Score : 59
Budget
New X Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - - $ 170,000 $ 3,880,000.00 $ - $ 4,050,000 $
6/30/2028
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 $ 340,000
$ 3,370,000 $ 3,370,000
$ 340,000 $ 340,000
$ - $ - $ 170,000 $ 3,880,000 $ - $ 4,050,000
$ 170,000 $ 3,880,000 $ 4,050,000
$ - $ - $ 170,000 $ 3,880,000 $ - $ 4,050,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Tennent-1 improvements as identified in the Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master Plan. This project includes the replacement of approximately 130 feet of 24-inch diameter pipeline, 1,250 feet of 30-inch diameter pipeline, and 10 feet of 36-inch diameter pipeline along Tennent Avenue and inside of the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) with 1,390 feet of 36-inch to 42-inch diameter pipeline.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master plan identified capacity deficiencies which result in surcharging of the gravity sewer and cause sanitary sewer overflows (SSO's) during modeled peak wet weather flow (PWWF) conditions.
General Plan Goals/Policies
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)
SS2405 - LOWER TENNENT TRUNK SEWER CAPACITY
Master Plan
500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1Estimated Expenditures to-dateProject Start 7/1/2026 Estimated Completion Description
25
Project Origin : Priority Score : 57
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ ‐ ‐ $ 660,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 660,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $ 600,000 600,000 $
$ 60,000 60,000 $
$ ‐ ‐ $ 660,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 660,000 $ $ 660,000 660,000 $
$ ‐ ‐ $ 660,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 660,000 $ Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Estimated Expenditures to‐dateProject Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion DesignConstructionContingency
Description
This project includes replacement of the anaerobic digester process boilers at the WPCP.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The anaerobic digestion process at the WPCP includes hot water boilers to heat water for use in the digester sludge heat exchanger. Two 40 HP Natural Gas Scotch Boilers, manufactured by Hurst Boiler & Welding Co., Inc. were installed in 2006 during the Anaerobic Digester Improvements project.
General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2404 ‐ WPCP BOILER REPLACEMENT
End of Life Cycle
TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)500 ‐ Sewer Enterprise FundGoal CS.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
26
Project Origin : Priority Score : 57
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ 990,000.00 $ ‐ $ 990,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $ 900,000 900,000 $
$ 90,000 90,000 $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ 990,000 $ ‐ $ 990,000 $ $ 990,000 990,000 $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ 990,000 $ ‐ $ 990,000 $ Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
ConstructionContingencyGoal CS.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1Estimated Expenditures to‐dateProject Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion Description
This project includes replacement of a dewatering centrifuge at the WPCP.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The solids handling process at the WPCP includes solids dewatering using centrifuges. One of two centrifuges at the WPCP was originally installed in 2006 and reused and relocated to the Solids Handling Building during the plant upgrades completed in 2019. The centrifuge is an Alfa Laval, Aldec G2‐95 unit.
General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2403 ‐ WPCP CENTRIFUGE REPLACEMENT
End of Life Cycle
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 ‐ Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
27
Project Origin : Priority Score : 59
Budget
New X Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - - $ - $ 125,000.00 $ 2,835,000.00 $ 2,960,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 250,000
$ 2,460,000 $ 2,460,000
$ 250,000 $ 250,000
$ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 2,960,000
$ 125,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 2,960,000
$ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 2,960,000
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
General Plan Goals/Policies
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
SS2402 - PINON-2 SEWER CAPACITY
Master Plan
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
500 - Sewer Enterprise FundGoal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)
Description
Pinon-2 improvements as identified in the Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master Plan. This project includes the replacement of approximately 820 feet of 6-inch to 10-inch diameter pipeline along San Pablo Avenue, 680 feet of 8-inch to 10-inch diameter pipeline along Pinon Avenue, 890 feet of 6-inch to 8-inch diameter pipeline along Appian Way, 290 feet of 6-inch diameter pipeline along Meadow Avenue, and 290 feet of 6-inch diameter pipeline between Meadow Avenue and San Pablo Avenue with 2,970 feet of 10-inch to 15-inch diameter pipelines.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master plan identified capacity deficiencies which result in surcharging of the gravity sewer and cause sanitary sewer overflows (SSO's) during modeled peak wet weather flow (PWWF) conditions. 28
Project Origin : Priority Score : 59
Budget
New X Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - 6,810,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,810,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 20,000 $ 20,000
$ 6,170,000 $ 6,170,000
$ 620,000 $ 620,000
$ 6,810,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,810,000$ 6,810,000 $ - $ 6,810,000$ 6,810,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,810,000 Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise FundGoal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1 2 Projected Budget
USE(S)Phase 2 (from Orleans to San Pablo) of the Pinon-1 improvements to the Sanitary Sewer Collection System, as identified in the Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master Plan.
SS2401 - PINON TRUNK SEWER CAPACITY PHASE 2
Regulatory Requirement
Description
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Construction of Phase 2 of the work. Phase 1 construction under SS2201.
General Plan Goals/Policies
Estimated Expenditures to-dateProject Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area :
29
Project Origin : Priority Score : 52
Budget
New X ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 1,000,000 150,000.00 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,150,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 135,000 $ 135,000
$ 900,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 2,700,000
$ 15,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 315,000
$ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,150,000$ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,150,000$ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,150,000 Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund SS2203 - EFFLUENT OUTFALL
Regulatory Requirement
USE(S)Planning
Description
The Effluent Outfall project is intended to reduce pressure in the effluent pipe during extreme storm events. Effluent pumping capacity of the treatment plant is limited by the capacity of the pipe size at the effluent outfall in Rodeo. Increasing the pipe size at the Effluent Outfall Eductor Station will increase the wet weather effluent pumping capacity and increase the lifespan of the effluent pipe by reducing the pressure in the line during storm events. This project requires coordination with Rodeo.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Design
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal HS.2, Policy HS.2.5; Goal OS.1, Policy OS.1.2Estimated Expenditures to-date $ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
30
Project Origin : Priority Score : 57
Budget
New X Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. Required
Rehabilitation
$ 160,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,135,883
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 20,000 $ 20,000
$ 71,283 $ 71,283
$ 68,717 $ 68,717
$ 160,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 160,000
$ 160,000 $ - $ 160,000
$ -
$ 160,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 160,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Construction
Contingency
Policy GM.4.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1
Estimated
Expenditures
to-date
$ 975,882.60
Project Start 7/1/2022 Estimated Completion
Description
Phase 1 (Tennent to Orleans) and Phase 2 (Orleans to San Pablo) of the Pinon-1 improvements to the Sanitary Sewer collection system, as identified in the Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master Plan.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
On October 4, 2022, City staff released an RFP for preliminary engineering design services for phase 1 of the Pinon project described in the City’s recently adopted Sanitary Sewer Master Plan.
On January 18, 2023, a one-year contract was executed with West Valley Construction Company, Inc. for the work.
General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2201 - SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION
Regulatory Requirement
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)
500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
276 - Growth Impact Fees
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)
Planning
Design
31
Project Origin : Priority Score : 46
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - 425,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 425,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 315,000 $ 315,000
$ 67,500 $ 67,500$ 42,500 $ 42,500
$ 425,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 425,000$ 425,000 $ 425,000$ 425,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 425,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Construction SC 3, SC 4ContingencyGoal CS.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) has five secondary clarifiers which slow the flow to allow the microorganisms and other solids to settle to the bottom of the clarifier where they can be returned to aeration tanks to continue treating waste.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Secondary Clarifiers 1 and 2 (SC1 and SC 2) were constructed in the early 1970s and are peripheral feed clarifiers. Secondary Clarifiers 3 and 4 (SC 3 and SC 4) were constructed in the early 1980s and are center feed clarifiers. Secondary Clarifier 5 (SC 5) was constructed in early 2000 and is a center feed, flocculator clarifier. In the first quarter of FY 2022-23, a preliminary inspection of the center column of the SC 5 was completed to examine the current condition and determine the scope of work for rehabilitation. In the second quarter of FY 2022-23, it was determined that SC 3 & SC 4 also require rehabilitation. Previously, this project was titled, "Secondary Clarifier - Center Column Rehabilitation" which only focused on the rehabilitation work required for SC 5.
General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2101 - SECONDARY CLARIFIER REHABILITATION
End of Life Cycle
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)DesignConstruction SC 5
32
Project Origin : Priority Score : 49
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 6,000 $ 6,000
$ 85,000 $ 85,000
$ 9,000 $ 9,000
$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyPolicy GM.4.1, Goal CS.1, Policy CS.2.6 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) is responsible for accrediting environmental testing labs including the Pinole - Hercules WPCP. The 2019 ELAP inspection results indicated the lab apparatus, countertops, and the fume hood are past their useful life and recommended replacement.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2002 - WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN LAB REMODEL
Regulatory Requirement
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
33
Project Origin : Priority Score : 50
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ 2,760,000 100,000.00 $ 4,440,000 $ - $ - $ 7,300,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 100,000 $ 100,000
$ 230,000 $ 370,000 $ 600,000
$ 2,300,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 6,000,000
$ 230,000 $ 370,000 $ 600,000
$ 100,000 $ 2,760,000 $ 4,440,000 $ - $ - $ 7,300,000$ 100,000 $ 2,760,000 $ 4,440,000 $ 7,300,000$ 100,000 $ 2,760,000 $ 4,440,000 $ - $ - $ 7,300,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyPolicy GM.4.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The City owns and operates two lift stations to convey flow from low lying areas to high elevations where the flow continues by gravity to the wastewater treatment plant. Both pump stations have reached the end of their useful life and need to be rehabilitated. The two pump stations are located on San Pablo Ave. and Hazel St. In FY 2019/20, this project was renamed to include both pump stations. Previously, this project was titled, “Hazel Street Sewer Pump Rehabilitation.” This project also includes the San Pablo Lift Station Force Main, approximately 640 feet of existing 6-inch will be replaced with 8-inch diameter force main.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The City recently completed a Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. In the first fiscal year of construction, the Hazel Street Lift Station will be replaced, followed by the replacement of the San Pablo Ave. Lift Station. The Hazel Street Lift Station will be replaced in coordination with RO2301.
General Plan Goals/Policies
SS1702 - SEWER PUMP STATION REHABILITATION
End of Life Cycle
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
34
Project Origin : Priority Score :
Budget
New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required
X Rehabilitation
$ 120,000 120,000.00 $ 120,000 $ 120,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 600,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $ 20,000 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 $ $ 90,000 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 450,000 $ $ 10,000 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 120,000 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 600,000 $ $ 120,000 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 600,000 $ $ 120,000 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 600,000 $ General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Functional Area : Stormwater
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Design
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)106 ‐ Measure S 2014
SW2401 ‐ STORM DRAIN CREEK DISCHARGE IMPROVEMENTS
End of Life Cycle
USE(S)Planning
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Goal CS.7, Policy CS.7.1; Goals OS.1, Policy OS.1.2; Goal CC.2, Policy CC.2.2Estimated Expenditures to‐date $ ‐
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Condition assessments have identified a number of storm drain pipelines that are structurally deteriorated and failing where they discharge into Pinole Creek. A systematic rehabilitation or replacement of failing storm drain infrastructure will be prioritized as part of the Storm Drain Master Plan.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
35
Project Origin : Priority Score : 33
Budget
New X ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 700,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 135,000 $ 135,000$ 500,000 $ 500,000
$ 65,000 $ 65,000
$ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000$ 700,000 $ 700,000$ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Stormwater
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyPolicy GM.4.1, Goal CS.7, Policy CS.7.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The existing system appears to have capacity issues at Roble Ave. and Encina Ave. that warrant review and upgrade. This project will assess the collection system for capacity and hydraulic profile and upgrade the system as necessary.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
SW2001 - ROBLE ROAD STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Staff Recommendation
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
36
Project Origin : Priority Score : 65
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 50,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 5,000 $ 5,000
$ 45,000 $ 45,000
$ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000
$ 50,000 $ 50,000
$ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000
RO2404 - CROSSWALK TENNENT AVE AT PRUNE ST
Functional Area : Streets & Roads Council Request
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Description
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Estimated Expenditures To-Date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2025 Estimated Completion
DesignHigh visibility crosswalks Tennent Ave at Prune St History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.8; Goal HS.6, Policy HS.6.1; Goal CE.4; Goal CS.2, Policy CS.2.6 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
TOTAL FUNDS
ConstructionContingency
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014
37
Project Origin : Priority Score : 58
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 570,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 570,000 $
6/30/2026
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 20,000 $ 20,000$ 35,000 $ 35,000
$ 465,000 $ 465,000
$ 50,000 $ 50,000
$ - $ 570,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 570,000
$ 55,000 $ 55,000
$ 515,000 $ 515,000
$ - $ 570,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 570,000
RO2403 - OLD TOWN TRAFFIC CALMING
Functional Area : Streets & Roads Council Request
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Description
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Estimated Expenditures To-Date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2025 Estimated Completion
DesignAssess feasibility of and alternatives for, and design and construct traffic calming measures on San Pablo Avenue between John St and Oak Ridge Rd. Consider addition of overhead decorative lighting on San Pablo Ave in the Old Town Area.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal GM.2, Policy GM.3.3, Policy GM.3.7; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.7; Goal CE.1, Policy CE.1.4; Goal CE.3, Policy CE.3.2; Goal CE.4, Policy CE.4.5; Goal CE.5; Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
TOTAL FUNDS
ConstructionContingency
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)325 - City Street ImprovementsUnfunded
38
Project Origin : Priority Score : 58
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 6/30/2026
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 465,000 $ 465,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 550,000 20,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 570,000 $ $ 35,000 20,000 $ $ 55,000 $ 515,000 $ 515,000 TOTAL FUNDS $ 550,000 20,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 570,000 $ ConstructionContingency
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)325 ‐ City Street ImprovementsUnfundedDesignAssess feasibility of and alternatives for, and design and construct traffic calming measures on San Pablo Avenue between John St and Oak Ridge Rd. Consider addition of overhead decorative lighting on San Pablo Ave in the Old Town Area.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal GM.2, Policy GM.3.3, Policy GM.3.7; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.7; Goal CE.1, Policy CE.1.4; Goal CE.3, Policy CE.3.2; Goal CE.4, Policy CE.4.5; Goal CE.5; Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
Description
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Estimated Expenditures To‐Date
$ ‐
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
RO2403 ‐ OLD TOWN TRAFFIC CALMING
Functional Area : Streets & Roads Council Request
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
39
Project Origin : Priority Score : 49
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 150,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 135,000 $ 135,000
$ 15,000 $ 15,000
$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ 150,000
TOTAL FUNDS $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000
TOTAL USES
ContingencySOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014DesignConstruction Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Goal CE.4, Policy CE.4.5; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.7; Goal CE.1, Policy CE.1.4; Goal CE.3, Policy CE.3.2; Goal CS.2, Policy CS.2.6; Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2; Goal H.3, Policy H.3.1; Goal GM.3, Policy GM.3.7; Goal HS.6, Policy HS.6.1Estimated Expenditures to-dateProject Start RO2402 - SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROGRAM
Staff Recommendation
USE(S)Planning
7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
This project involves removing barriers to accessibility for persons using wheelchairsor other personal assistance devices and improving pedestrian accessibility andsafety by reconstructing or upgrading curb ramps at various locations throughout theCity.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
40
Project Origin : Priority Score : 69
Budget
New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required
X Rehabilitation
$ 350,000 350,000.00 $ 350,000 $ 350,000.00 $ 350,000.00 $ 1,750,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $ ‐
$ 320,000 320,000 $ 320,000 $ 320,000 $ 320,000 $ 1,600,000 $ $ 30,000 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 $ $ 350,000 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,750,000 $ $ 350,000 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,750,000 $ $ 350,000 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,750,000 $ General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal CE.3, Policy CE.3.2; Policy GM.3.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2; Goal CE.7; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.7 Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Design
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)105 ‐ Measure S 2006
RO2401 ‐ ROAD MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
Staff Recommendation
USE(S)Planning
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Estimated Expenditures to‐date
$ ‐
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Road repair and rehabilitation at various locations. The primary focus of this project is dig out repairs on major arterials and collectors.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
41
Project Origin : Priority Score : 33
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. Required
Rehabilitation
$ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 100,000 $ 100,000
$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000
$ 100,000 $ 100,000
$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000
RO2303 - PINOLE SMART SIGNALS
Staff Recommendation
TOTAL USES
TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)
106 - Measure S 2014
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)
Planning
Design
Construction
Contingency
Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
Estimated
Expenditures
to-date
$ -
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The Smart Signals project will develop, manage, and implement ITS initiatives that improve the safety and efficiency of multimodal mobility, maximize highway and arterial system throughput, and improve operational efficiency, safety, and reduce environmental impact throughout Contra Costa County. Contra Costa Tranportation Authority is the project lead and will coordinate the project throughout the county. Twelve traffic signals have been identified as candidates for the Smart Signals project. These signals are located on Pinole arterial roadways (Appian Way & San Pablo Avenue).
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Deployment of the Smart Signals Project is expected to result in operational and safety improvements for all modes of transportation, such as decrease in travel time and total delay, reduction in number of stops and secondary accidents, reduction of fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and reduction of response time for emergency vehicles. The initial cost estimate of construction is $1,499,829 of which CCTA will receive $1,345,527 in OBAG funds. The City's match requirement of $154,302 was paid in FY 2023/24. A contingency is budgeted for potential obligations for changes in construction that may be requested by the City.
General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
42
Project Origin : Priority Score : 38
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 275,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 265,000 $ 265,000
$ 10,000 $ 10,000
$ 275,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000$ 239,040 $ 239,040
$ 35,960 $ 35,960
$ 275,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
USE(S)Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2Estimated Expenditures to-date $ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
This project will install pedestrian crossing enhancements at three mid-block crossings on arterial roadways. The enhancements include continental markings, median refuge islands, advanced stop bars and Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons. The three mid-block crossings are: San Pablo Ave. & Third Ave.; San Pablo Ave. & Quinan St.; and Pinole Valley Road & Savage Ave.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Funding for improvements was secured through Cycle 11 HSIP grant funds.
General Plan Goals/Policies
RO2302 - SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ON ARTERIAL ROADWAYS
Staff Recommendation
PlanningContingency
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
ConstructionDesignSOURCE(S)215 - Grant: HSIP 106 - Measure S 2014 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
43
Project Origin : Priority Score : 34
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 750,000 750,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 65,000 $ 60,000 $ 125,000
$ 620,000 $ 630,000 $ 1,250,000
$ 65,000 $ 60,000 $ 125,000
$ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000$ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,500,000 TOTAL FUNDS $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)325 - City Street ImprovementsDesign Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024
RO2301 - ROAD REHABILITATION
Pavement Management Program
USE(S)Planning
Estimated Completion
Description
Based on the most current P-TAP report and field inspections, various segments will be recommended annually for rehabilitation. Recommended treatment include patch paving, slurry seal, cape seal, mill and fill.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
44
Project Origin : Priority Score : 27
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 170,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 170,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 30,000 $ 30,000
$ 120,000 $ 120,000
$ 20,000 $ 20,000
$ - $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 170,000
$ 170,000 $ 170,000
$ - $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 170,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
SOURCE(S)100 - General Fund
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
USE(S)PlanningDesignConstructionContingency
RO2107 - BRANDT ST. IMPROVEMENTS
Council Request
Projected Budget
General Plan Goals/Policies
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024
Summary of Capital Cost
Goal CE.4, Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CS.10 Estimated Completion
Description
Provide improvements on Brandt St. including application of pavement treatments based on type and severity of distresses on existing pavement.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
45
Project Origin : Priority Score : 43
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 735,000 20,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 792,805 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 20,000 $ 80,000 $ 100,000
$ 623,000 $ 623,000
$ 32,000 $ 32,000
$ 20,000 $ 735,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 755,000
$ 381,082 $ 381,082
$ 20,000 $ 87,411 $ 107,411
$ 266,507 $ 266,507
$ 20,000 $ 735,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 755,000
General Plan Goals/Policies
Policy CE.1.4, Policy CS.2.6, Policy CS.3.3, Policy H.3.1, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Design
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)200 - Gas Tax500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund325 - City Street Improvements RO2102 - TENNENT AVE REHABILITATION
Pavement Management Program
USE(S)Planning
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ 37,805.00
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The construction impacts from the WPCP upgrade project resulted in pavement deterioration. This project will rehabilitate Tennent Ave. from San Pablo Ave. to WPCP. In February 2021, the City selected a consultant to complete the preliminary engineering for this project.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
In preparation of this project, the City retained a consultant to perform internal CCTV on this section of roadway. The inspection was completed in early 2021. Coordinating collection system improvements with street resurfacing projects ensures that sewer improvements are made prior to the resurfacing so that manholes and valve covers may be properly realigned, and repairs and replacements are made in a cost-effective manner. This also avoids cutting and patching recently paved streets. The City of Hercules will reimburse $86,430 for this project. In addition, this project is being coordinated with RO1902 for efficient implementation. 46
Project Origin : Priority Score : 37
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ - 1,990,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,048,480 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 10,000 $ 10,000
$ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000
$ 180,000 $ 180,000
$ 1,990,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,990,000$ 1,095,000 $ 1,095,000 $ 895,000 $ 895,000
TOTAL FUNDS $ 1,990,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,990,000
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)200 - Gas Tax377 - Arterial Streets RehabilitationDesign Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ 58,480.00
Project Start 7/1/2024
RO2101 - ARTERIAL REHABILITATION
Pavement Management Program
USE(S)Planning
Estimated Completion
Description
The project is currently in the design phase and aims to maximize the funding available to complete rehabilitation work beginning at the southern city limit on Pinole Valley Road to the bridge west of Savage Ave. The project will include replacement, modification, or installation of a ADA compliant curb ramps, road rehabilitation, and striping.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Based on the 2019 P-TAP report, various segments were recommended for treatment by StreetSaver®. The recommendations were further validated through a comparative pavement analysis and coring samples to explore additional treatment options which are not discussed in the P-TAP report. This will allow the City to optimize the available funding. The section of roadway selected based on the analysis was Pinole Valley Road from the southern city limits.
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
47
Project Origin : Priority Score : 50
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 905,000 515,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,475,300 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 45,000 $ 45,000
$ 425,000 $ 825,000 $ 1,250,000
$ 45,000 $ 80,000 $ 125,000
$ 515,000 $ 905,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,420,000
$ 51,000 $ 99,000 $ 150,000
$ 464,000 $ 556,000 $ 1,020,000
$ 250,000 $ 250,000
$ 515,000 $ 905,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,420,000
General Plan Goals/Policies
Policy CE.1.4, Policy CS.2.6, Policy CS.3.3, Policy H.3.1, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Design
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)325 - Grant: STMP Fees215 - Grant: OBAG106 - Measure S 2014 RO1902 - PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AT TENNENT AVE. NEAR RXR Staff Recommendation
USE(S)Planning
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ 55,300.00
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
In 2018, the East Bay Regional Park District completed a trail link to connect Pinole Shores Regional Shoreline to Bayfront Park trail. There remains one very small gap on Tennent Ave. from Bayfront Park to Railroad Ave. Improvements to Tennent Ave. at the Railroad Crossing will facilitate safe movement of bicycles and pedestrians. Since project inception, the scope of work has evolved to include improvements that would maximize parking on Railroad Avenue for park users. In February 2021, the City selected a consultant to complete the preliminary engineering for this project.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
WCCTAC held its STMP Call for Projects in 2018 which committed $100k in funding for preliminary engineering from the 2006 STMP program for this project. City staff also submitted an OBAG 3 application in July 2022 to compete for funding for this project. If awarded, the City will need a match of $345k. 48
Project Origin : Priority Score : 55
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. Required
Rehabilitation
$ 1,915,894.00 $ 28,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 31,884,899
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 133,579 $ 4,150,000 $ 4,283,579
$ 1,782,315 $ 1,782,315
- $ 24,650,000 $ 24,650,000
-
$ 1,915,894 $ 28,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,715,894
$ 41,394 $ 41,394
$ 1,499,189 $ 1,499,189
$ 133,579 $ 133,579
$ 241,732 $ 241,732
$ 28,800,000 $ 28,800,000
$ 1,915,894 $ 28,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,715,894
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
USE(S)
Estimated
Expenditures
to-date
$ 1,169,005.00
Project Start 7/1/2024
Policy CS.3.3, Goal H.3, Policy H.3.1, Goal CE.3, Goal CE. 7, Policy CE.7.3, Goal CS.10.
Estimated Completion
Description
The San Pablo Avenue bridge over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad is an integral part of the area’s transportation network. The age and condition assessment of the bridge supports replacement. The City was approved for initial funding from the Caltrans Highway Bridge Program (HBP). In February 2020, the City awarded a contract to a consultant for preliminary engineering (PE) to advance the project. The PE will be completed in two phases due to funding limitations. Completion of preliminary design is necessary to develop a final cost estimate for the project. Unfunded portions of this project appear in the Unfunded list.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
The total budget identified to complete the PE exceeds the amount of funding Caltrans committed to the project of the State’s share in the current HBP. In October 2022, a draft type selection report was submitted to Caltrans for review. This report is the first step to request additional funding allocations from the Caltrans HBP to complete the PS&E phase and construction phase of the project.
RO1710 - SAN PABLO AVENUE BRIDE OVER BNSF RAILROAD
End of Life Cycle
TOTAL FUNDS
325 - Grant: STMP Fees
215 - Grant: TLC
106 - Measure S 2014
Unfunded
TOTAL USES
Project Management
Planning & Design
Construction
Contingency
SOURCE(S)
325 - Grant: HBP
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
49
Project Origin : Priority Score : 33
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ - 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 10,000 $ 10,000$ 80,000 $ 80,000$ 10,000 $ 10,000
$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)200 - Gas TaxDesignAs part of the high school construction project WCCUSD provided road improvements along the school frontage. Improvements to Pinole Valley Road - from Shea Dr. to Helena Ct. will extend the useful life of the pavement. The existing pavement score is high in this area, so a slurry seal may be the recommended treatment.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
RO1708 - PINOLE VALLEY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Council Request
USE(S)PlanningEstimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Estimate FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
50
Project Origin : Priority Score :
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 75,000 $ 75,000
$ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000
$ 75,000 $ 75,000
$ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingency
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The facilities master plan will serve as a roadmap for achieving identified strategic objectives to improve service delivery and utilization of real estate and facility assets. The masterplan will serve to aid decision-making on capital improvements for a defined list of City owned facilities and provide information on potential major maintenance needs (e.g., repairs vs. replace) as applicable.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
IN2301 - FACILITIES & REAL ESTATE MASTER PLAN
Staff Recommendation
TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014
TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
51
Project Origin : Priority Score :
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 100,000 $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 This project will connect with the Contra Costa County’s project to provide continuous sidewalks and bike lanes along Appian Way from San Pablo Dam Rd. in unincorporated El Sobrante. This project will involve coordination with Contra Costa County. The construction phase of this project is unfunded and appears in the Unfunded and Unprogrammed list.
General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Contingency
USE(S)
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)325 - Grant: STMP Fees
IN2105 - APPIAN WAY COMPLETE STREETS
Staff Recommendation
PlanningDesignConstruction
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Policy CE.1.4, Policy CS.2.6, Policy CS.3.3, Policy H.3.1, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2Estimated Expenditures to-date $ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Completion of preliminary engineering and design to provide continuous sidewalks and bike lanes along Appian Way beginning from unincorporated El Sobrante to about 1500 lineal feet north of the City limit within Pinole. In December 2021, City Council approved a Cooperative Funding Agreement with WCCTAC to receive STMP funds to complete preliminary design for this project.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
52
Project Origin : Priority Score :
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 60,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,152 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 60,000 $ 60,000$ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000$ 60,000 $ 60,000$ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
USE(S)Policy OS.8.1, Policy OS.8.7, Goal SE.9, Policy SE.9.1, Policy SE.9.4Estimated Expenditures to-date $ 15,152.25
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
A feasibility study will allow the City to plan and phase the construction of future recycled water distribution system infrastructure. The study will identify potential recycled water customers, evaluate the quantity, quality, and recycled water distribution system options to address the needs of potential users in surrounding areas, seek opportunities to phase the construction of a recycled water delivery system, and develop planning-level cost options for the phased system.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Recycled water delays or eliminates the need to construct more potable water facilities, sustains the economy with increased water supply reliability, protects the environment, safeguards investments in parks and landscaping with drought proof or drought resistant water supply, and contributes to a green and healthy environment. In 2019, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) prepared an Updated Recycled Waster Plan which considered the potential for potable reuse in EBMUD’s water service area. The development of a new recycled water supply for the Phillips 66 refinery in Rodeo using effluent from the Pinole-Hercules and Rodeo wastewater treatment plants was among the recommended non-potable reuse projects. This project is estimated to deliver up to 3.67 MGD of recycled water to the refinery for use in their boilers and cooling towers. The combined final disinfected effluent from both plants would be pumped at the Rodeo Pump Station to the refinery for treatment a new advanced recycled water treatment plan. This project was recommended by EBMUD because it would deliver a large amount of water to a single customer, with comparatively few pipelines required due to the short distance between the sources of wastewater and the Phillips 66 Refinery General Plan Goals/Policies IN2103 - RECYCLED WATER FEASIBILITY
Council Request
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)100 - General Fund Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
53
Project Origin : Priority Score :
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 170,000 30,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 30,000 $ 30,000
$ 170,000 $ 170,000
$ 30,000 $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000$ 30,000 $ 170,000 $ 200,000$ 30,000 $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 DesignConstructionContingency
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)100 - General Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningPolicy GM.4.1, Policy CS.2.6, Goal CS.9, Goal HS.4Estimated Expenditures to-date $ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
During severe natural hazard events, it is highly likely that utility power will not be available for an extended period of time. Critical facilities will need reliable sources of sustained electrical power to continue operations. This project will: 1) identify critical facilities in need of back-up power in coordination with an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) , 2) assess power loads in each critical facility that requires back-up power, 3) determine the costs and technology options including solar battery storage, and 4) make any additional recommendations to Council before advancing to construction.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The Public Safety Building, Fire Station 74, and the Water Pollution Control Plant have stand by generators.
General Plan Goals/Policies
IN2101 - EMERGENCY POWER FOR CRITICAL FACILITIES
Council Request
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
54
Project Origin : Priority Score :
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 150,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
USE(S)Policy GM.4.1, Policy CS.7.1Estimated Expenditures to-date $ 100,000.00
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Preparation of a storm drain master plan will provide an analysis of the existing collection system. The plan will identify system deficiencies related to capacity, functionality, and permit compliance. The plan can serve to guide future budget allocations for improvements to the system.
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
IN1703 - STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN
Staff Recommendation
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
55
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN: FY 2024/25 THROUGH FY 2028/29
UNFUNDED PROJECTS LIST
# Unfunded Projects
UF001 Railroad Avenue Bridge Removal and Replacement
UF002 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in City Lots
UF003 Parking Lot Resurfacing
UF004 LLAD Landscape Restoration and Improvement
UF005 Dog Park Restroom Replacement
UF006 Dog Park Resurfacing and Fencing Improvements
UF007 Eucalyptus Grove Restoration
UF008 Fernandez Park Baseball Grandstand Improvement
UF009 Repave Trails
UF010 ADA Ramps
UF011 Appian Complete Streets
UF012 Pedestrian Bridge Maintenance (formerly known as Bridge Maintenance) UF013 Pavement Maintenance
UF014 I-80/Pinole Valley Rd. Interchange Improvements
UF015 Shale Hill Retaining Wall and Sidewalk Gap
UF016 Sidewalks Gaps
UF017 Signal System Upgrades
UF018 Tennent-2
UF019 Tree Master Plan
UF020 San Pablo Avenue Bridge over BNSF Railroad
UF021 Installation of Solar at City Facilities
UF022 All Access Weather Roads
UF023 San Pablo Avenue Complete Streets
UF024 Signalized Intersections
UF025 Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections
UF026 Safety at Unsignalized Intersections
UF027 Roadway Segments #1
UF028 Roadway Segments #2
UF029 Roadway Segments #3
UF030 Vehicular Bridge Maintenance
UF031 Old Town Traffic Calming
UF032 City Hall Energy Upgrades
UF033 Public Safety Building Energy Upgrades
UF034 WPCP Energy Upgrades
UF035 Youth Center Upgrades
UF036 Park Energy Upgrades
Legend:
New unfunded projects added
56
UNFUNDED PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
57
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Sanitary Sewer
Stormwater
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 11
Project Information
Council Request
Facilities
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
43 UF001 - Railroad Avenue Bridge Removal and Replacement The Contra Costa County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District has
advised removal of the Railroad Avenue
Bridge. The bridge is a flood barrier. The
first step is to determine if the City of
Pinole is the responsible agency for this
project.
$ -
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Project Origin:
UF002 - Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in City Lots The City desires to promote and
encourage the use of electric vehicles.
With increased adoption of alternative fuel
vehicles, the need for charging
infrastructure is growing. The City wishes
to install charging stations in city owned
parking lots. The first step is to complete a
load study at City owned parking lots to
determine the electrical capacity at each
site. There may be significant electrical
upgrades necessary to install charging
stations. Electrical capacity and siting
determine ultimately determine the cost of
each project. There are incentives
available for the charging equipment.
$ -
Bay Area Air Quality Management District, West
Contra Costa Transportation Authority, Marin
Clean Energy
Functional Area:
Priority Score:
58
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Facilities
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 32
Project Information
LLAD Report
LLAD
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 27
- LLAD Landscape Restoration and Improvement
The Pinole Valley Road Landscape and
Lighting Assessment District was formed
in 2008. The City installed various
improvements on Pinole Valley Road
between Henry Avenue and Ramona
Street. The district provides maintenance
to traffic signals, streetlights, median
landscaping, irrigation for landscaping,
electricity to traffic signals and streetlights,
and graffiti removal. This project will
maintain and restore turf, shrubs, plants
and trees within the District. In FY
2022/23, this work was completed for
Zone A (between I-80 and Henry Ave.)
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ -
Fund 345 & 348
UF003 - Parking Lot Resurfacing
UF004
This project is to maintain and enhance
existing City owned parking facilities and
infrastructure, to increase parking supply,
and to support ongoing multi-modal and
streetscape improvements. Improvements
include saw cutting and demolition,
pavement removal, earthwork, pavement
installation, curb and gutter, striping, and
signage.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ -
59
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Parks
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 36
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Parks
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 36
UF006 - Dog Park Resurfacing and Fencing Improvements
Resurfacing and fencing improvements Project Origin:
Functional Area:
The existing restroom located at the Dog
Park is beyond its useful life and requires
replacement.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ 200,000
$ 75,000
UF005 - Dog Park Restroom Replacement
60
Project Information
Council Request
Parks
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 22
Project Information
End of Life Cycle
Parks
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 27
$ 150,000
$ 250,000
- Fernandez Park Baseball Grandstand Improvement
The current grandstand is aging and
requires increased maintenance to
maintain its serviceability.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
UF008
UF007 - Eucalyptus Grove Restoration
The open space located between the Old
Town area between John St. and Pinole
Valley Road is forested with Eucalyptus
trees. In 2014, a Safety Inspection was
conducted by a consultant. A total of 8
trees were recommended for removal, and
root crown excavation was recommended
for 3 trees. 2 trees were determined to be
hollow and recommended for further
investigation to evaluate the level of
internal decay. In 2018, the City hired a
company to remove 20 Eucalyptus trees in
the area. There are still many trees left
and many of the prior trees were felled
with the trunks remaining on site. This
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
61
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Parks
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 25
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 49
$ -
$ -
- ADA Ramps
This project involves removing barriers to
accessibility for persons using wheelchairs
or other personal assistance devices and
improving pedestrian accessibility and
safety by reconstructing or upgrading curb
ramps at various locations throughout the
City.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
UF010
- Repave Trails
The City’s goal is to develop safe,
connected, and comfortable bicycle and
pedestrian facilities for people of all ages
and abilities. Repaving trails will enhance
trail access from the City’s roadway
network to encourage alternative modes of
transportation. The Active Transportation
Plan is underway and will identify a trail
network and recommend improvements.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
UF009
62
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 30
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 22
- Pedestrian Bridge Maintenance
Maintenance of pedestrian bridges as
identified in the Pedestrian Bridge
Inspection Reports completed by Quincy
Engineering, Inc. In FY 2023/24 there is
$50,000 budgeted in the operating budget
for maintenance activities.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ 224,700
UF012
- Appian Complete Streets
This project will provide continuous
sidewalks and bike lanes along Appian
Way from San Pablo Dam Rd. in
unincorporated El Sobrante to about 1500
lineal feet north of the city limit within the
City of Pinole. The City received STMP
funds from West Contra Costa
Transportation Authority for preliminary
design. The construction phase remains
unfunded.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ 970,000
UF011
63
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 25
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 9
- I-80 / Pinole Valley Rd Interchange Improvements
This project will widen Pinole Valley Road
ramp terminal intersections at I-80 to
provide a dedicated right turn lane to the
eastbound and westbound I-80 on ramps.
This project will also provide crossing
enhancements at the Pinole Valley Road
and I-80 intersection.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ 10,959,000
UF014
UF013 - Pavement Maintenance
The City uses a pavement management
software known as StreetSaver to
strategize the most cost effective method
to extend the pavement life. Pavement
Maintenance is necessary to maintain the
City’s pavement network. Deferred
maintenance results in increased costs
over time.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Fund 200 and Fund 106
$ 42,000,000
64
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 9
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 16
UF015 - Shale Hill Retaining Wall and Sidewalk Gap
UF016 - Sidewalk Gaps
Project Origin:
$ -
This project will address sidewalk gaps by
installing public sidewalks where
sidewalks are missing on one or both
sides of the street. This work will be
coordinated with other construction
projects. Sidewalk gaps often exist in
places with site constraints (i.e. right of
way, grade/slopes, or utility conflicts) or
are adjacent to properties that have been
required to provide sidewalks in the past
due to land uses or ownerships. Locations
for repair will be selected based on site
conditions, pedestrian safety, and
adjacent property attributes.
Functional Area:
Shale Hill is located on San Pablo Ave.
near Oak Ridge Road. The cut slope
above the pavement is comprised of shale
which is loose and sloughs onto the road.
There is no sidewalk in this area because
the toe of the embankment is uncontrolled
and there is inadequate space to
accommodate a sidewalk. Staff has not
been successful in securing grant funds
for this project.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ -
65
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 16
Project Information
Master Plan
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 59
Signal System Upgrades
This project will upgrade various aspects
of the City’s traffic signal system including:
traffic signal controller equipment, vehicle
detection, traffic signal arms and heads,
battery backup systems, and
communications systems to reduce
congestion and improve safety for the
Pinole community.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ 4,239,000
This project involves replacement of the
approximately pipeline along Tennent
Avenue.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
UF018 - Tennent-2 Sewer Capacity Improvements
$ -
UF017 -
66
Project Information
Beautification Adhoc Committee
Infrastructure Assessment
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 11
Project Information
End of Life Cycle
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 58
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Fund 213, Fund 214, Economic Stimulus Funds
$ 28,800,000
This project will replace the existing
thirteen span reinforced concrete span
structure over the Burlington Northern
Santa Fe Railroad adjacent to San Pablo
Avenue at the easterly limits of the City.
On 02/18/20, Council awarded a contract
to a Consultant to begin the preliminary
engineering (PE) for this project (CIP
Project RO1710). The PE will be
completed in two phases due to funding
limitations. The first phase was necessary
to develop a final cost estimate to facilitate
pursuing additional funding required to
complete all phases including
construction.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Cal Fire Urban and Community Forestry Grant
Program
UF020 - San Pablo Avenue Bridge over BNSF Railroad
$ 375,000
UF019 - Tree Master Plan
In 2019, the City Council established a
Beautification Ad Hoc Committee to
analyze options for, and to make
recommendations to Council regarding
clean-up and beautification projects in
Pinole. Among other projects, the
Committee recommended the
development of a Tree Master Plan to
inventory the existing trees, and to
develop a plan for managing the tree
inventory, including finding tree planting
opportunities.
67
Project Information
Council Request
Facilities
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 37
Project Information
General Plan
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 20
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ -
The General Plan, Chapter 8 discusses
improvement of open space management
to reduce wildfire risks. There is a desire
to have improved, all-weather access
roads through open space to improve
access to and from Hercules and El
Sobrante to shorten response times and
improve mutual aid.
Functional Area:
UF022 - All-Weather Access Roads
$ -
UF021 - Installation of Solar at City Facilities
This project involves procurement and
installation of solar panels at City owned
facilities to offset the City’s electricity
consumption and reduce the greenhouse
gas impacts.
Project Origin:
68
Project Information
Council Request
Infrastructure Assessment
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 15
Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 46
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
$ 183,792
Improvement to signal hardware, signal
timing, or protected left turn phases at:
· Appian Way & Fitzgerald Dr
· San Pablo Ave & Tennent Ave
· Appian Way & Canyon Dr/Tara Hills
· Pinole Valley Rd/Tennent Ave/Ellerhorst St
· San Pablo Ave & Pinole Valley Rd
· San Pablo Ave & Pinon Ave/Appian Way
· Pinole Valley Rd & Estates Ave
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program
(STMP) funds
UF024 - Signalized Intersections
$ 200,000
UF023 - San Pablo Avenue Complete Streets
A complete streets plan would create a
new vision for San Pablo Avenue, to
transform it into a place where people of
all ages and abilities can travel safely and
comfortably whether walking, bicycling,
riding transit, or driving . The UF031 - Old
Town Traffic Calming project is within the
limits of this project which may partially or
completely replace it.
69
Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 46
Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 46
Install intersection lighting, install/upgrade
larger or additional stop signs or other
intersection warning/regulatory signs, or
install RRFB:
· Walter Ave & San Pablo Ave
· Pinole Valley Rd & Simas Ave
· Pinole Valley Rd & Wright Ave
· Pinole Valley Rd & Rafaela St
· Wright Ave & Carol St
· Simas Ave & Moraga Dr
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
$ 879,830
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
UF026 - Safety at Unsignalized Intersections
$ 514,548
UF025 - Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections
Installation of advance stop bars before
crosswalk, raised median on approaches,
raised pavement markers and striping
through intersection at:
· Appian Way & Fitzgerald Dr
· San Pablo Ave & Tennent Ave
· Appian Way & Canyon Dr/Tara Hills
· Pinole Valley Rd/Tennent Ave/Ellerhorst St
· San Pablo Ave & Pinole Valley Rd
· Fitzgerald Dr and Best Buy Parking Lot
· Pinole Valley Rd & Estates Ave
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.
70
Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 46
Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 46
- Roadway Segments # 2
Install centerline rumble strips/stripes, or
install edge-lines and centerlines, or install
RRFB:
· Pinole Valley Rd: San Pablo Ave to Collins Ave
· San Pablo Ave: Oak Ridge Rd to Pinole Valley Rd
· San Pablo Ave: Golden Gate to Del Monte Dr
· Tara Hills: Kilkenny Way to Appian Way
· Walter Ave: North Terminus to San Pablo Ave
· Tennent Ave: San Pablo Ave to Pinole Valley Rd
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ 914,375
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
UF028
- Roadway Segments # 1
Install segment lighting, or install/upgrade
signs with new fluorescent sheeting, or
install delineators, reflectors/object
markers.
· Pinole Valley Rd: San Pablo Ave to Collins Ave
· San Pablo Ave: Oak Ridge Rd to Pinole Valley Rd
· San Pablo Ave: Golden Gate to Del Monte Dr
· Tara Hills: Kilkenny Way to Appian Way
· Walter Ave: North Terminus to San Pablo Ave
· Fitzgerald Dr: Jovita Ln to Appian Way
· Appian Way: San Pablo Ave to Michael Dr
· Tennent Ave: San Pablo Ave to Pinole Valley Rd
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
$ 1,469,474
UF027
71
Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 46
Project Information
Caltrans Bridge Inspection
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 22
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
UF030 - Vehicular Bridge Maintenance
$ 1,483,510
UF029 - Roadway Segments # 3
Implement road diet, or install
dynamic/variable speed warning signs, or
install/upgrade pedestrian crossing:
· Pinole Valley Rd: San Pablo Ave to Collins Ave
· San Pablo Ave: Oak Ridge Rd to Pinole Valley Rd
· Tara Hills: Kilkenny Way to Appian Way
· Fitzgerald Dr: Jovita Ln to Appian Way
· Appian Way: San Pablo Ave to Michael Dr
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.
Maintenance of vehicular bridges as
identified in the Caltrans Bridge Inspection
Reports. The latest bridge inspection
issued in May 2023, contains
recommendations for three bridges near:
· PVHS High School on Pinole Valley Rd
· Wright Ave on Pinole Valley Rd
· On Simas Ave near Pinole Valley Rd
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ -
72
Project Information
Council Request
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 58
Project Information
Assessment
Facilities
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 57
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.
Assess feasibility of and alternatives for,
and design and construct traffic calming
measures on San Pablo Avenue between
John St and Oak Ridge Rd. This project is
within the limits of UF023 - San Pablo
Avenue Complete Streets project and may
partially or completely replace it.
UF032 - City Hall Energy Upgrades
$ 570,000
UF031
$ 189,000
- Old Town Traffic Calming
73
Project Information
Assessment
Facilities
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 58
Project Information
Assessment
Sanitary Sewer
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 59
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)
$ 1,686,000
Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.
Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.
UF033 - Public Safety Building Energy Upgrades
UF034 - WPCP Energy Upgrades
$ 160,000
74
Project Information
Assessment
Facilities
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 58
Project Information
Assessment
Parks
Cost Estimate:
Potential Funding Sources:
Priority Score: 62
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
Project Origin:
Functional Area:
$ 30,000
Park Energy Upgrades
$ 17,000
UF035 - Youth Center Energy Upgrades
Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.
Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.
UF036 -
75
APPENDIX I
APPENDIX I: Capital Improvement Plan Consistency with General Plan Funding is estimated for specific projects or asset plans in the FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) which support the goals and policies of following elements of the General Plan:
• Community Character (CC)
• Growth Management (GM)
• Land Use & Economic Development (LU)
• Housing (H)
• Circulation Element (CE)
• Community Services and Facilities (CS)
• Health and Safety (HS)
• Natural Resources and Open Space (OS)
• Sustainability Element (SE)
The acroynms and associated General Plan goals/policies are listed on individual project sheets.
The FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 CIP includes funding for projects over the next five (5) fiscal years that support General Plan policies and enhance public infrastructure, amenities, and services in Pinole. The CIP is consistent with and helps implement the following General Plan goals and policies:
Community Character Element
GOAL CC.1 Maintain Pinole’s unique qualities and sense of place to preserve the established historic and small-town character of the city.
POLICY CC.1.2 Require all new development to incorporate high-quality site design, architecture and planning to enhance the overall quality of the built environment in Pinole and create a visually interesting and aesthetically pleasing town environment.
POLICY CC.1.3 To enhance a sense of arrival and create a strong appealing image that promotes community identity, the City shall develop community entry features at key gateways or city entries along Interstate 80. Entryways shall incorporate landscaping, trees, structural architectural elements, signage and public art.
POLICY CC.1.5 Encourage project compatibility, interdependence and support with neighboring uses, especially between commercial and mixed-use centers and the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Uses should relate to one another with pedestrian connections, transit options, shared parking, landscaping, public spaces, and the orientation and design of buildings.
GOAL CC.2 Emphasize and enhance the visual and physical connection between the city’s natural environment and the community’s quality of life.
POLICY CC.2.1 Provide visual and physical connections between the natural environment and the built environment through careful site design, building placement, architectural features that allow views of Pinole’s unique environment such as ridgelines or the San Pablo Bay shoreline, public access to open space such as via the Bay Trail, and the use of native vegetation in the urban environment such as for landscape buffers for sidewalk areas and street trees.
POLICY CC.2.2 Preserve natural resources within the built environment, including trees, marshes, creeks and hillsides.
GOAL CC.5 Enhance the quality of life in Pinole by acknowledging the cultural diversity and by promoting, preserving and sustaining the cultural and performing arts.
POLICY CC.5.1 Celebrate the city’s cultural diversity through public art, cultural centers and community events for the benefit and enjoyment of all residents.
POLICY CC.5.2 Develop programs and facilities that promote the cultural and performing arts in Pinole.
Growth Management Element
GOAL GM.1 Regional Planning. Support cooperative transportation, land use and public service planning in Contra Costa County.
POLICY GM.1.1 West Contra Costa County Planning Activities. Achieve efficient public service delivery by coordinating with affected jurisdictions and agencies concerning public and private developments.
GOAL GM.3 Efficient Transportation. Support land use patterns that make efficient use of the transportation system and enhance public safety.
POLICY GM.3.1 Transportation Management. Make more efficient use of the regional and subregional transportation system.
POLICY GM.3.3 Provide Adequate Transportation Facilities and Services. Provide adequate transportation facilities while maintaining neighborhood integrity.
POLICY GM.3.7 Mobility-Impaired. Support efforts to provide safe and convenient transportation systems for all citizens of Pinole, particularly mobility-impaired individuals.
GOAL GM.4 Compact Development and Service Areas. Encourage infill and redevelopment in areas that are already served by utilities, infrastructure and public services.
POLICY GM.4.1 Planning for Present and Future Community Needs. Plan for, provide and maintain a level of public infrastructure facilities and services that adequately serves the present and future needs of the community.
Land Use & Economic Development Element
GOAL LU.1 Preserve and enhance the natural resources, high-quality residential neighborhoods and commercial areas, and small-town (semi-rural) character of Pinole.
POLICY LU.1.3 Establish and implement a continuing program of civic beautification, gateway or entryway enhancement, tree planting, maintenance of homes and streets, and other measures which will promote an aesthetically desirable environment and attractive neighborhood areas.
GOAL LU.4 Preserve and strengthen the identity and quality of life of Pinole’s residential neighborhoods.
POLICY LU.4.1 Ensure all new development, renovation or remodeling preserves and strengthens Pinole’s residential neighborhoods by requiring projects to be harmoniously designed and integrated with the existing neighborhood.
GOAL LU.6 Protect and enhance the natural resources of the San Pablo Bay waterfront for the enjoyment of Pinole residents.
POLICY LU.6.3 Provide waterfront parks, pedestrian pathways and recreation areas that are safe, accessible, and attractive for public use.
Housing Element
GOAL H.2 Protect Existing Character and Heritage. Protect and enhance the integrity and distinctive character and heritage of Pinole encouraging the development of high quality, welldesigned housing and conserving existing housing.
POLICY H.2.4 Maintain Existing Housing and Neighborhood Amenities. Maintain Pinole’s lifestyle characteristics by encouraging the maintenance of existing housing stock, and in particular housing with historic value, and preserving the amenities of existing neighborhoods.
GOAL H.3 Provide Adequate Services and Facilities. Provide adequate services and facilities to meet the needs of the city’s current and future population.
POLICY H.3.1 Plan For Public Facility and Services Needs. Future development shall be planned based on public facility and service capacity, community-wide needs, sound citywide and neighborhood planning and public improvement programming.
POLICY H.3.4 Encourage new pedestrian-oriented development. Encourage new development and redevelopment that places residences in close proximity to a variety of services and facilities.
Circulation Element
GOAL CE.1 Reduce vehicle miles traveled and encourage the use of public transit.
POLICY CE.1.1 Encourage strategic growth that concentrates future development along Pinole’s three primary transit corridors (San Pablo Avenue, Appian Way and Pinole Valley Road).
POLICY CE.1.3 Encourage development that is sensitive to both local and regional transit measures and that promotes the use of alternative modes of transportation.
POLICY CE.1.4 Encourage maximum utilization of the existing public transit system and alternate modes of transportation in Pinole.
GOAL CE.3 Provide timely input and effective means (as appropriate) of programming street and highway improvements to maintain the objective peak hour level of service without detrimentally impacting community character or commercial activity.
POLICY CE.3.2. Maintain roadway network at or above established LOS thresholds.
GOAL CE.4 Establish programs to support sidewalk, trail and street enhancements, where feasible.
POLICY CE.4.5 Inventory sidewalk conditions to identify opportunities for enhancements to the circulation system and to help prioritize repair and maintenance activities as funding becomes available.
GOAL CE.5 Provide adequate parking and loading facilities while encouraging alternative means of transportation.
GOAL CE.7 Support bicycle use as a mode of transportation by enhancing infrastructure to accommodate bicycle and rides.
POLICY CE.7.1 Enhance the City’s Bikeway network through the use of Class I, II, and III bikeways.
POLICY CE.7.3 Establish a network of multi-use paths to facilitate safe and direct offstreet bicycle and pedestrian travel.
Community Services and Facilities Element
GOAL CS.1 Provide safe, attractive and efficiently designed infrastructure and sustainable facilities to serve the public.
POLICY CS.1.1 The City will strive to provide safe, attractive and efficiently designed facilities for public and quasi-public organizations.
POLICY CS.1.3 The City will endeavor to provide convenient access to community facilities and services to all areas of the community.
GOAL CS.2 Ensure and maintain a high level of public safety in the community.
POLICY CS.2.6 The City will continue to fund the repair, maintenance and expansion of facilities to respond to evolving service needs.
GOAL CS.3 Provide adequate and high-quality recreational opportunities and programs for the community.
POLICY CS.3.1 Continue to provide a variety of recreational opportunities that serve and represent all aspects of the community.
POLICY CS.3.3 Expand and organize a multi-use trail system.
GOAL CS.6 Provide adequate, economical and dependable wastewater collection service and treatment.
POLICY CS.6.1 The City shall continue to make capital improvements to the wastewater collection and treatment system to maintain system capability and reliability.
GOAL CS.7 Minimize flooding.
POLICY CS.7.1 The City will ensure that the storm drain system has adequate capacity to minimize street flooding and, where feasible, shall expand the capacity of the system to control storm flows.
GOAL CS.9 Provide economical and dependable community services while conserving energy resources.
POLICY CS.9.1 The City will seek opportunities to improve the energy efficiency of facilities and operations.
GOAL CS.10 Provide safe, efficient roadway infrastructure to support multiple modes of transportation and to meet existing and future circulation needs.
POLICY CS.10.2 The City will update, where possible, the existing roadway network to enhance pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation while maintaining safe vehicular circulation.
Health and Safety Element
GOAL HS.1 Minimize the potential for loss of life, injury, damage to property, economic and social dislocation, and unusual public expense due to natural and man-made hazards.
GOAL HS.2 Protect the community from the risk of flood damage and improve surface water quality.
POLICY HS.2.4 Continue to monitor studies that identify anticipated changes in sea level and create appropriate standards and improvements to minimize flood risks.
POLICY HS.2.5 Establish appropriate capital improvements and management programs to reduce wet weather sewer treatment demand and avoid discharge to the shallow water outfall.
GOAL HS.3 Minimize hazards of soil erosion, weak and expansive soils, potentially hazardous soils materials, other hazardous materials, geologic instability and seismic activity.
POLICY HS.3.5 Require proper handling, storage, disposal and cleanup of hazardous materials to prevent leakage, potential explosions, fires or the escape of harmful gases and to prevent individually innocuous materials from combining to form hazardous substances, especially at the time of disposal.
GOAL HS.4 Ensure that government agencies, citizens and businesses are prepared for an effective response and recovery in the event of emergencies or disasters.
POLICY HS.4.1 Continue to provide essential emergency public services during natural catastrophes
POLICY HS.4.3 Incorporate technological enhancements in new and substantially remodeled structures and facilities to support and improve emergency services.
GOAL HS.6 Support multiple forms of transportation and a circulation system design that reduces vehicle trips and emissions.
POLICY HS.6.1 Promote and encourage walking and bicycling as viable forms of transportation to services, shopping and employment.
GOAL HS.7 Ensure that all new development meets or exceeds state and federal water quality standards.
POLICY HS.7.1 Support Regional, state and federal clean water programs.
POLICY HS.7.3 Reduce the transport of runoff and surface pollutants.
POLICY HS.7.6 Establish appropriate capital improvements and management programs to reduce wet weather sewer treatment demand and avoid discharge to the shallow water outfall.
Natural Resources and Open Space Element
GOAL OS.1 Ensure the preservation of natural resources by determining appropriate land use and compatibility with natural resources and open space.
POLICY OS.1.2 Agency Cooperation. Work with Federal, State and local regulatory and trustee agencies to promote the long-term sustainability of local natural resources.
Sustainability Element
GOAL SE.3 The City will reduce its contribution to climate change and mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change as appropriate.
POLICY SE.3.1 Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from City operations and community sources by a minimum of 15 percent below current or baseline levels by the year 2020.
POLICY SE.3.4 Reduce GHG emissions by reducing vehicle miles traveled and by increasing or encouraging the use of alternative fuels and transportation technologies.
POLICY SE.1.3 Enhance the energy efficiency of all City facilities.
GOAL SE.4 Optimize energy efficiency and renewable energy.
POLICY SE.4.2 Explore opportunities for City-wide expansion of Programs and Facilities related to energy efficiency and conservation.
GOAL SE.5 Achieve a solid waste diversion of 75% of the waste stream by 2020.
GOAL SE.7 Air quality will be maintained and improved for the City of Pinole and the Bay Area as a region and not decline below levels measured in early 1990’s.
POLICY SE 7.3 Support efforts to comprehensively address air quality issues through education, regulation, and innovation.
GOAL SE.8 Utilize transit options and reduce vehicle miles traveled and single-occupancy vehicle use.
POLICY SE.8.7 Work to improve Pinole’s pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and to meet the needs of all pedestrians and bicyclists.
POLICY SE.8.10 Support and promote the use of low- and zero-emissions vehicles, alternative fuels, and other measures to directly reduce emissions from motor vehicles.
Community Character Element
GOAL CC.1 Maintain Pinole’s unique qualities and sense of place to preserve the established historic and small-town character of the city.
POLICY CC.1.2 Require all new development to incorporate high-quality site design, architecture and planning to enhance the overall quality of the built environment in Pinole and create a visually interesting and aesthetically pleasing town environment.
POLICY CC.1.3 To enhance a sense of arrival and create a strong appealing image that promotes community identity, the City shall develop community entry features at key gateways or city entries along Interstate 80. Entryways shall incorporate landscaping, trees, structural architectural elements, signage, and public art.
APPENDIX II
APPENDIX II: Prioritization Matrix Category Scoring Guidelines
1. Regulatory Compliance – Compliance with regulatory mandates issued by agencies likes California State Water Resources Control Board, California Department of Resources, Recycling and Recovery, Department of Fish and Wildlife, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, or other County, State and federal laws. This also includes the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and self-imposed City ordinances. The score should be based on the answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project address a current regulatory mandate? b. Will the proposed project proactively address a foreseeable (within the next 5 years) regulatory mandate?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project does
not address a
regulatory
compliance issue
The project provides a short-term
fix for an existing regulatory
compliance issue or for one
anticipated in the near future
The project resolves a
pressing or long-term
regulatory compliance
issue
2. Health/Safety – Projects that improve the overall health and safety of the community such as multi-purpose trails, transportation safety improvements, new recreation facilities, address safety issues at City facilities, enhancements to police, fire, and emergency medical services.
The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project impact the health and wellbeing or safety of Pinole residents and/or employees?
b. Does the project mitigate a serious risk or liability health/safety issue and to what degree? c. Does the project help assist the City to respond more effectively and efficiently to emergencies throughout the community?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project
does not impact
the health
and/or safety of
the community
The project addresses a serious
health and/or safety issue that
has a limited impact or
addresses a less-serious issue
but serves the health and or
safety of the broader community
The project directly
addresses a serious health
and/or safety issue that
has a widespread impact
and/or improves the health
of the community
3. Project Dependency/Bundling– The completion of the proposed project is complementary to the completion of a precursor capital project/master plan or the proposed project would be implemented efficiently if it was coordinated with another capital project. A project that is not
needed for many years would score lower than a project that needs to be completed before another project can start. The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. When is the proposed project needed?
b. Do any other projects require the proposed project to be completed first? c. Does the proposed project require other projects to be completed first? d. Can the proposed project be completed in conjunction with another project for coordinated, efficient implementation?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project does
not have a project
dependency
The project can be completed
in conjunction with another
project for coordinated,
efficient implementation
The project must be
completed before another
priority project can start
4. Long-Term Planning – General Plan, Three-Corridor Specific Plan, 2020-2025 Strategic Plan, Long-Term Financial Plan, Pinole Economic Development Strategy, Master Plans, Emergency Operations Plan, Communication and Engagement Plan, Climate Action Plan, Local Road Safety Plan, Active Transportation Plan, Parks Master Plan, and departmental strategic plans which serve as a resource for the City to meet goals set forth by City departments, advisory boards and commissions, and the community at-large. Plans include documents that have been prepared internally to assure consistent adherence to industry best practices, as well as those documents that are created with the assistance of outside consultants. A component of long-term planning includes public discussion and/or public engagement. The score should be based on the answers to the following example questions:
a. Is the proposed project contained in one or more of the City’s long-term planning documents?
b. Is the proposed project listed as a high priority?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project is not
part of any longterm planning
document
The project is included in a
long-term planning
document, but may not be
high priority
The project is included
in a long-term planning
document and is a high
priority
5. State of Infrastructure – Projects that address failing infrastructure (i.e., sidewalks, streets, lighting, municipal buildings, recreation facilities) or facilities that have exceeded their useful life. The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project maintain the condition or value of existing infrastructure? b. Does the proposed project avoid potential failure due to substandard conditions?
c. Will the proposed project address a facility that is outdated or exceeded its useful life? d. Is the proposed project supported by a life cycle analysis of repair versus replacement and a master plan for that type of asset?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project
maintains
existing
infrastructure
at current
service levels
The project extends the
service life of an existing
asset or adds new
infrastructure to support
growth
The project addresses existing
infrastructure which has reached
the end of its useful life and is
supported by a life cycle analysis
of repair vs. replacement
6. Operating Budget Impact – Some proposed projects may impact the operating budget for the next few years or for the life of the facility. Some proposed projects can offer cost savings or revenue generation opportunities. The score should be based on answers to the following questions:
a. Will the proposed project require additional personnel to operate? b. Will the proposed project require additional annual maintenance? c. Will the proposed project require additional equipment not included in the project budget?
d. Will the proposed project reduce staff time and City resources thereby resulting in a positive impact on the operational budget?
e. Are there cost savings or revenue generation opportunities as a result of the efficiency of the proposed project?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project will have
a negative impact
on the budget. It will
require additional
money to operate
The project will not
impact the operating
budget as it is
cost/revenue neutral
The project will have a positive
impact on the budget. It will
result in significant savings in
staff time, materials, or offer
revenue generation
7. Quality of Life – Projects that provide widespread economic prosperity, recreational and cultural activities, environmental benefits, beautify Pinole, and attract new residents and visitors. The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project help to create a beautiful and clean community? b. Does the proposed project encourage participation in recreational and cultural activities?
c. Does the proposed project attract new residents, businesses, or visitors? d. Does the proposed project increase environmental stewardship?
e. Does the proposed project contribute towards economic development and revitalization efforts?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project will not
have an impact on the
quality of life for the
Pinole community
The project has
moderate impact on the
quality of life for the
Pinole community
The project greatly
impacts the quality of life
for the Pinole community
8. Grant Funding – The proposed project is partially or fully supported by grants from State or Federal funds. The percentage of total cost funded by an external source will determine the score in this category.
Scoring scale:
0 1 2 3 4 5
0% - 16%
External
Funding
17% - 33%
External
Funding
34% - 50%
External
Funding
51% - 67%
External
Funding
68% - 84%
External
Funding
85% to
100%
External
Funding
9. Sustainability and Conservation – The proposed project furthers the City’s sustainability and conservation goals. The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project improve the health of the community and natural environment through sustainable designs with improved air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change? b. Does the proposed project increase use of active modes of transportation and reduces the need for auto-dependency?
c. Does the proposed project incorporate design that meets or exceeds federal and State standards in the field of energy efficiency, such as State of California Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards, LEED building standards, etc.?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project will not
impact the City’s
ability to achieve
sustainability and
conservation goals
The project will have a
modest positive impact
on the City’s ability to
achieve sustainability
and conservation goals
The project will have a
significant positive impact on
the City’s ability to achieve
sustainability and
conservation goals
CITY COUNCIL
REPORT 12.A.
DATE: JUNE 18, 2024
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ERIC CASHER, CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PROCESS FOR ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF
ELECTED MAYOR
RECOMMENDATION
Receive Report and Provide Direction
BACKGROUND
At the May 21, 2024 City Council meeting, the Council approved Councilmember Murphy’s request for a future agenda item and staff presentation on the process for establishing an elected mayor in the City of Pinole.
The City of Pinole’s City Council is currently comprised of five (5) members elected at large to four-year terms. The position of Mayor is rotated among the City Council on a yearly basis.
The Council has a long-standing tradition of prioritizing the council member who received the highest number of votes in the prior election to serve in the role of Mayor. The process for setting the Mayoral rotation schedule was adopted by City Council in Resolution 2010-87, and is based on the number of votes received by each member in the prior election.
REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
Procedural Requirements
California Government Code Sections 34900 et seq. sets forth the requirements for establishing an elected Mayor. The Government Code requires the position of elected mayor to be established through a voter-approved ballot measure. Section 34900 provides that at any general municipal election the city council may submit to the electors the question of whether electors shall thereafter elect a mayor and four city council members and whether the mayor shall serve a two-year or four-year term. The provisions of Code Section 34901 control the form of the ballot measure. It states the questions printed on the ballot should read:
“Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city council members?” “Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?”
“Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?”
The words “Yes” and “No” and “two years” and “four years” shall be so printed on the ballots
that the voters may express their choice. The term of office of mayor shall be that preferred by a majority of those voting on the proposition.
The provisions of Code Section 34902 set forth procedures for designating a council seat as the mayor’s seat and filling of that seat by subsequent election. If a majority of the votes cast are in favor of an elective office, one seat on the council is designated as the office of the mayor at the next general municipal election held in the city.
In order to initiate the process of transitioning to an elected mayor, the City Council must adopt a resolution calling for a measure to be added to the November 5, 2024 ballot. Submission of the ballot measure to the County must occur at least eighty eight (88) days prior to the election, or no later than August 9, 2024. The ballot measure would then be published and filed with the County.
Powers of Elected Mayor
An elected mayor is a member of the City Council and has all the powers and duties of a member of the City Council.For the most part, an elected mayor has the same powers as an appointed mayor. State law designates some additional powers of elected mayors in general law cities.
An appointed or “selected” mayor has powers and duties that include presiding at City Council meetings, administering oaths and affirmations and certifying affidavits and/or acknowledging documents which are executed by the City and required to be acknowledged, and directing a sufficient number of peace officers to attend public meetings at which in his or her opinion a breach of peace could occur.
The only additional power a general law city elected mayor is afforded is the power to make appointments to boards, commissions, and committees, subject to the approval of the City Council. Furthermore, an elected mayor may collect a salary in addition to the salary established for council members if approved by the electorate or by ordinance adopted by the City Council.
Neighboring City Elected Mayors
There are a few cities in Contra Costa County with elected mayors. The charter of the City of Richmond has an elected mayor whose duties include making appointments and removals from all city boards and commissions subject to council approval, preparing an annual budget for submission to the council, and publishing an annual report regarding the affairs of the city.
Additionally, the City of San Ramon has an elected mayor, who is compensated more than the rest of the council and afforded the same benefits as city employees. The City of Brentwood, California also has an elected mayor.
FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated cost to place one ballot measure on the November 5, 2024 ballot is $30,000.
Additional costs from staff time, consultants, and legal experts may be incurred during the
process however the exact fiscal impact is unknown at this time.
ATTACHMENTS
A. 2010-87 CC Reso Reaffirming Mayoral Rotation Schedule
RESOLUTION 2010-87
PROCUEDURES FOR SELECTING MAYOR & MAYOR PRO TEM
REAFFIRMATION OF THE MAYORAL ROTATION SCHEDULE APPROVED IN 2003 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pinole adopted Resolution 3211 on February 6, 1996 concerning the procedure for selecting the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tempore; and:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pinole adopted Resolution 3285 on December 17, 1996, concerning the procedure for selecting the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tempore; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pinole adopted Resolution 109-2000 on February 15, 2000, concerning the procedure for selecting the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tempore; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pinole adopted Resolution 179-2003, amending the procedure for selecting the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tempore; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pinole adopted a minute order action on January 19, 2009 concerning the procedure for selecting the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tempore; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pinole intends to adopt a single resolution to ratify the actions and reaffirm the former procedure (Resolution 109-2000) for selection of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore; NOW, therefore, the City Council of the City of Pinole does hereby resolve as follows:
It is in the best interest of the City of Pinole that the councilmembers that shall serve as Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore are selected by the City Council annually according to a system of succession that permits the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore to gain sufficient experience prior to assuming their respective offices. It is appropriate to base such succession on rotation, seniority and election results in accordance with the following:
1. Mayoral List. The City Clerk shall maintain a Mayoral List in accordance with this Resolution.
The City Clerk shall update the Mayoral List for Council affirmation, following each council election and council vacancy that occurs. The Mayoral List in effect as of the adoption date of this Resolution is attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
2. Succession Generally, When a position on the Mayoral List is vacated for any reason, except as otherwise provided in this Resolution, the next councilmember listed on the Mayoral List shall succeed to the vacant position in accordance with the Mayoral List and this Resolution.
3. Succession to Mayor, When the office of Mayor is vacated for any reason, the Mayor Pro Tempore listed on the then-current Mayoral List shall succeed to the office of Mayor.
4. Succession to the Office of Mayor Pro Tempore. When the office of Mayor Pro-tempore is vacated for any reason, the next councilmember listed on the then-current Mayoral List shall succeed to the office of Mayor Pro Tempore.
1
5. Placement of the Outgoing Mayor on the Mayoral List. The name of the outgoing Mayor shall be placed at the end of the Mayoral List, unless the outgoing Mayor is re-elected (in that election year), in which case, Section 6 shall apply.
6, Placement of Newly Elected Councilmembers on the Mayoral List. The names of the highest vote getters among newly elected councilmembers (incumbent or non-incumbent) shall be placed on the Mayoral List after incumbent councilmembers in order of most votes received, but before the outgoing Mayor unless the outgoing mayor is re-elected at the same election, in which case the outgoing Mayor shall also be placed on the list in order of votes received.
7. Placement on the Mayoral List of Non-Incumbent Councilmembers Newly Elected or Appointed to Fill Vacancies. Non-incumbent councilmembers newly elected or appointed to fill vacancies on the City Council shall be placed last on the Mayoral List, but above the outgoing Mayor, if any, at the time the vacancy is filled,
8. Councilmembers’ Right to Decline the Offices of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore. Councilmembers may decline to succeed to the office of Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore pursuant to the Mayoral List and this Resolution. When a councilmember so declines to succeed to such office, such office shall pass to the next councilmember listed on the Mayoral List that is eligible pursuant to this Resolution to succeed to such office.
The names of councilmembers that so decline to succeed to the office of Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore shall be placed on the Mayoral List immediately following the name of the councilmember that succeeds to such office, notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution.
9. Removal of Mayor by Council Vote, Councilmembers that have succeeded to the office of Mayor in accordance with the Mayoral List and this Resolution may be removed from that office by a majority vote of the full Council. Such removed Mayor shall be treated the same as an outgoing Mayor for purposes of the Mayoral List and this Resolution.
This resolution supercedes Resolutions 3211 and 3285, 109-2000, and 179-2003, and any prior minute order actions, which are hereby repealed and of no further force or effect.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED this 19th day of October 2010, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Banuelos, Fujita, Long, Murray, Swearingen NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Patricia Athenoui1lMC
City Clerk
2
EXHIBIT A to Resolution 2010-87
MAYOR ROTATION LIST
October 19, 2010 — Current Status
LONG SWEARINGEN MURRAY FUJITA BANUELOS
(2nd place vote (2nd highest (Outgoing Mayor Served 1/2 year Appointed August recipient in vote recipient in 12/2008, & term as Mayor in 18, 2008, fill Feb 08 in Nov 4, 2008 highest vote May 2008, when vacancy from Vacancy Election- recipient in Horton resigned Horton’s Council /Recall 1 time switch Nov 4, 2008 as Mayor resignation
Election) with Murray Election) 7/21/08
per 1/13/2009
minute order
December December December December December
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2011-2012 2012-2013
POST NOVEMBER 2, 2010 ELECTION
SWEARINGEN MURRAY New member New member 2 NEWLY New member (2nd highest vote (Outgoing Highest vote 2nd Highest vote ELECTED 3rd Highest vote getter in recipient in Nov4, Mayor in getter in 2010 getter in 2010 MEMBERS FROM 2010 election —will never 2008 Election- 12/2008, & election Election NOVEMBER 2012 ascend to Mayor unless re I time switch with highest vote Term Dec Term Dec 2010- ELECTION ADDED elected in Nov 2012 as 1st Murray per recipient in 2010-Dec 2014 Dec 2014 TO CHART FOR or 2nd highest 1/13/2009 minute Nov 4, 2008 ROTATION Term Dec 2010-Dec 2014 order Election) BEGINNING
DECEMBER 2014
December December December December December
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
3