Agenda packet — Pittsburg City Council, September 15, 2025 (part 3 of 4)

8 Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Hikma Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Hikma Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 306 of 460 ends

9 The undersigned, Pittsburg city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Hikma Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Hikma Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Hikma Settlement.

Signature: /signer_1_som/
Name: /name_1_som/
Title: /title_1_som/
Date: /date_1_som/
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 307 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Hikma Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.

Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re-allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Weighted Allocation Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 308 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
1of15
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Alameda County Alameda 2.332% 2.853% 2.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069% 0.0570162%
City Albany Alameda 0.013% 0.0107768%
City Berkeley Alameda 0.152% 0.1249656%
City Dublin Alameda 0.033% 0.040% 0.0338810%
City Emeryville Alameda 0.023% 0.0185765%
City Fremont Alameda 0.108% 0.0888576%
City Hayward Alameda 0.117% 0.0966218%
City Livermore Alameda 0.054% 0.0446740%
City Newark Alameda 0.026% 0.0217626%
City Oakland Alameda 0.486% 0.595% 0.5055601%
City Piedmont Alameda 0.014% 0.0114064%
City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067% 0.0554547%
City San Leandro Alameda 0.039% 0.0321267%
City Union City Alameda 0.043% 0.0352484%
County Amador County Amador 0.226% 0.277% 0.2349885%
County Butte County Butte 1.615% 1.975% 1.6783178%
City Chico Butte 0.216% 0.264% 0.2246499%
City Oroville Butte 0.079% 0.0646595%
County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226% 0.277% 0.2351644% County Colusa County Colusa 0.059% 0.0489221%
County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102% 2.571% 2.1844585% City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037% 0.0301879%
City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0215339%
City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002% 0.0018060%
City Concord Contra Costa 0.055% 0.0456676%
City Danville Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0082255%
City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023% 0.0189024%
City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006% 0.0046030%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 309 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
2of15
City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012% 0.0098593%
City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004% 0.0031007%
City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0079416%
City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005% 0.0038157%
City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0110909%
City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053% 0.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0106309%
City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146% 0.1201444%
City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018% 0.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021% 0.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114% 0.140% 0.1189608% County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768% 0.939% 0.7980034% City Placerville El Dorado 0.015% 0.0127642%
City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081% 0.0665456%
County Fresno County Fresno 1.895% 2.318% 1.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065% 0.0536211%
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012% 0.0098554%
City Fresno Fresno 0.397% 0.3270605%
City Kerman Fresno 0.005% 0.0042534%
City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008% 0.0066167%
City Mendota Fresno 0.002% 0.0019387%
City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004% 0.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008% 0.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012% 0.0098804%
City Sanger Fresno 0.018% 0.0146135%
City Selma Fresno 0.015% 0.0127537%
County Glenn County Glenn 0.107% 0.131% 0.1116978%
County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030% 1.260% 1.0703185% Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Arcata Humboldt 0.054% 0.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117% 0.143% 0.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032% 0.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258% 0.315% 0.2679006% City Brawley Imperial 0.011% 0.0087986%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 310 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
3of15
City Calexico Imperial 0.019% 0.0152799%
City El Centro Imperial 0.158% 0.1302522%
City Imperial Imperial 0.006% 0.0048791%
County Inyo County Inyo 0.073% 0.089% 0.0754413%
County Kern County Kern 2.517% 3.079% 2.6159145%
City Arvin Kern 0.006% 0.0046425%
City Bakersfield Kern 0.212% 0.1747198%
City California City Kern 0.009% 0.0070820%
City Delano Kern 0.030% 0.0249316%
City McFarland Kern 0.003% 0.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kern 0.015% 0.0120938%
City Shafter Kern 0.013% 0.0103417%
City Tehachapi Kern 0.009% 0.0073580%
City Wasco Kern 0.008% 0.0069861%
County Kings County Kings 0.293% 0.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007% 0.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013% 0.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027% 0.0226038%
City Lemoore Kings 0.016% 0.0131900%
County Lake County Lake 0.795% 0.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041% 0.050% 0.0426253%
City Lakeport Lake 0.021% 0.026% 0.0222964%
County Lassen County Lassen 0.319% 0.391% 0.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027% 0.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896% 16.999% 14.4437559% Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Agoura Hills Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040024%
City Alhambra Los Angeles 0.042% 0.0343309%
City Arcadia Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0267718%
City Artesia Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0005100%
City Azusa Los Angeles 0.026% 0.0210857%
City Baldwin Park Los Angeles 0.027% 0.0218520%
City Bell Los Angeles 0.008% 0.0068783%
City Bellflower Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0014485%
City Bell Gardens Los Angeles 0.014% 0.0114301%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 311 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
4of15
City Beverly Hills Los Angeles 0.065% 0.0534897%
City Burbank Los Angeles 0.100% 0.0823132%
City Calabasas Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048948%
City Carson Los Angeles 0.019% 0.0159805%
City Cerritos Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039682%
City Claremont Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0082584%
City Commerce Los Angeles 0.000% 0.0002971%
City Compton Los Angeles 0.044% 0.0361882%
City Covina Los Angeles 0.028% 0.0229127%
City Cudahy Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006020%
City Culver City Los Angeles 0.055% 0.0449894%
City Diamond Bar Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006993%
City Downey Los Angeles 0.052% 0.0429994%
City Duarte Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0027261%
City El Monte Los Angeles 0.031% 0.038% 0.0318985%
City El Segundo Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0268020%
City Gardena Los Angeles 0.034% 0.0278088%
City Glendale Los Angeles 0.166% 0.1366586%
City Glendora Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134411%
City Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040549%
City Hawthorne Los Angeles 0.050% 0.0407833%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0145307%
City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023% 0.0190667%
City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059% 0.0489195%
City La Canada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0025565% City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039971%
City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0081572%
City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045% 0.0369689%
City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012999%
City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024% 0.0194190%
City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0017731%
City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0031940%
City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439% 0.3614151%
City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715% 3.321% 2.8218811 %
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 312 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
5of15
City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134345%
City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0019269%
City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260686%
City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0035528%
City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0254455%
City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030% 0.0250670%
City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0256677%
City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0258228%
City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046% 0.0375827%
City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0053102% City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011% 0.0091483%
City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146% 0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0183333%
City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111% 0.0911933%
City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012645%
City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062% 0.0506992%
City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0028260%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0104837%
City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0147726%
City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009% 0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0178167%
City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0257531%
City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158% 0.1298513%
City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048646%
City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0084884%
City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039603%
City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020% 0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012% 0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039498%
City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112% 0.0919820%
City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0047305%
City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049% 0.0404521%
City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0108517%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 313 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
6of15
City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260581%
County Madera County Madera 0.349% 0.427% 0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012% 0.0097332%
City Madera Madera 0.039% 0.0318441%
County Marin County Marin 0.564% 0.690% 0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015% 0.0124697%
City Mill Valley Marin 0.020% 0.0168401%
City Novato Marin 0.028% 0.0229824%
City San Anselmo Marin 0.009% 0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089% 0.0729823%
County Mariposa County Mariposa 0.084% 0.103% 0.0876131% County Mendocino County Mendocino 0.439% 0.536% 0.4558394% City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039% 0.0317153%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Merced County Merced 0.551% 0.674% 0.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024% 0.0195846%
City Livingston Merced 0.006% 0.0045873%
City Los Banos Merced 0.020% 0.0165142%
City Merced Merced 0.061% 0.0500762%
County Modoc County Modoc 0.065% 0.080% 0.0678250%
County Mono County Mono 0.023% 0.029% 0.0242606%
County Monterey County Monterey 0.908% 1.111% 0.9437083% City Greenfield Monterey 0.006% 0.0050552%
City King City Monterey 0.005% 0.0037355%
City Marina Monterey 0.017% 0.0144098%
City Monterey Monterey 0.041% 0.0336540%
City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009% 0.0074842%
City Salinas Monterey 0.094% 0.0776576%
City Seaside Monterey 0.023% 0.0191772%
City Soledad Monterey 0.007% 0.0060870%
County Napa County Napa 0.288% 0.352% 0.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017% 0.0136869%
City Napa Napa 0.078% 0.0642783%
County Nevada County Nevada 0.441% 0.539% 0.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024% 0.0197805%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 314 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
7of15
City Truckee Nevada 0.003% 0.0023843%
County Orange County Orange 4.364% 5.339% 4.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0113841%
City Anaheim Orange 0.554% 0.678% 0.5759282%
City Brea Orange 0.086% 0.0708897%
City Buena Park Orange 0.087% 0.0714352%
City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124% 0.152% 0.1288366%
City Cypress Orange 0.033% 0.0271937%
City Dana Point Orange 0.001% 0.0005560%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055% 0.0455980%
City Fullerton Orange 0.137% 0.168% 0.1425744%
City Garden Grove Orange 0.213% 0.1752482%
City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247% 0.302% 0.2568420%
City Irvine Orange 0.139% 0.170% 0.1442350%
City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047% 0.058% 0.0493043%
City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014% 0.0115457%
City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001% 0.0007071%
City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001% 0.0006546%
City La Habra Orange 0.060% 0.073% 0.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012% 0.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012% 0.0095439%
City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008% 0.0069190%
City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179% 0.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150% 0.1231320%
City Placentia Orange 0.029% 0.035% 0.0298912%
City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001% 0.0006296%
City San Clemente Orange 0.008% 0.010% 0.0086083%
City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008% 0.0065510%
City Santa Ana Orange 0.502% 0.614% 0.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020% 0.0165891%
City Stanton Orange 0.035% 0.0291955%
City Tustin Orange 0.073% 0.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104% 0.127% 0.1082721%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 315 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
8of15
City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044% 0.0362223%
County Placer County Placer 1.045% 1.278% 1.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017% 0.0141114%
City Lincoln Placer 0.031% 0.0255599%
City Rocklin Placer 0.076% 0.0625485%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Roseville Placer 0.196% 0.1616559%
County Plumas County Plumas 0.205% 0.251% 0.2128729%
County Riverside County Riverside 4.534% 5.547% 4.7128296% City Banning Riverside 0.017% 0.0143848%
City Beaumont Riverside 0.021% 0.0171135%
City Blythe Riverside 0.012% 0.0096714%
City Canyon Lake Riverside 0.000% 0.0001761%
City Cathedral City Riverside 0.067% 0.0553614%
City Coachella Riverside 0.021% 0.0173054%
City Corona Riverside 0.147% 0.1207083%
City Desert Hot Springs Riverside 0.024% 0.0200433%
City Eastvale Riverside 0.000% 0.0002747%
City Hemet Riverside 0.051% 0.0421792%
City Indio Riverside 0.056% 0.0457794%
City Jurupa Valley Riverside 0.001% 0.0008991%
City Lake Elsinore Riverside 0.021% 0.0172949%
City La Quinta Riverside 0.063% 0.0516732%
City Menifee Riverside 0.032% 0.0260909%
City Moreno Valley Riverside 0.137% 0.1130348%
City Murrieta Riverside 0.048% 0.059% 0.0497423%
City Norco Riverside 0.016% 0.0134542%
City Palm Desert Riverside 0.083% 0.0682465%
City Palm Springs Riverside 0.076% 0.0629862%
City Perris Riverside 0.009% 0.0076774%
City Rancho Mirage Riverside 0.052% 0.0431098%
City Riverside Riverside 0.268% 0.2206279%
City San Jacinto Riverside 0.010% 0.0085936%
City Temecula Riverside 0.022% 0.0180086%
City Wildomar Riverside 0.008% 0.0062500%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 316 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
9of15
County Sacramento County Sacramento 3.797% 4.645% 3.9465887% Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Citrus Heights Sacramento 0.057% 0.0465312%
City Elk Grove Sacramento 0.130% 0.1066994%
City Folsom Sacramento 0.108% 0.0890850%
City Galt Sacramento 0.017% 0.0143704%
City Rancho Cordova Sacramento 0.008% 0.0067679%
City Sacramento Sacramento 0.721% 0.882% 0.7496530%
County San Benito County San Benito 0.106% 0.130% 0.1101417% City Hollister San Benito 0.027% 0.0225355%
County San Bernardino County San Bernardino 3.259% 3.987% 3.3878124% City Adelanto San Bernardino 0.008% 0.0066640%
City Apple Valley San Bernardino 0.025% 0.0207360%
City Barstow San Bernardino 0.015% 0.0122056%
City Chino San Bernardino 0.064% 0.0525893%
City Chino Hills San Bernardino 0.001% 0.0006388%
City Colton San Bernardino 0.031% 0.0253443%
City Fontana San Bernardino 0.112% 0.0920543%
City Grand Terrace San Bernardino 0.006% 0.0051051%
City Hesperia San Bernardino 0.035% 0.0291522%
City Highland San Bernardino 0.004% 0.0029061%
City Loma Linda San Bernardino 0.009% 0.0071188%
City Montclair San Bernardino 0.039% 0.0322108%
City Ontario San Bernardino 0.179% 0.1472934%
City Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 0.084% 0.0689431%
City Redlands San Bernardino 0.057% 0.0469150%
City Rialto San Bernardino 0.073% 0.0603206%
City San Bernardino San Bernardino 0.178% 0.1461880%
City Twentynine Palms San Bernardino 0.002% 0.0012605%
City Upland San Bernardino 0.052% 0.0424460%
City Victorville San Bernardino 0.033% 0.0269400%
City Yucaipa San Bernardino 0.016% 0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 317 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
10of15
City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003% 0.0021228%
County San Diego County San Diego 5.706% 6.980% 5.9309748% City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128% 0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189% 0.231% 0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044% 0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113% 0.0933582%
City Encinitas San Diego 0.061% 0.074% 0.0630289%
City Escondido San Diego 0.145% 0.1192204%
City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014% 0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055% 0.068% 0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022% 0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080% 0.0656808%
City Oceanside San Diego 0.213% 0.1753428%
City Poway San Diego 0.062% 0.0511040%
City San Diego San Diego 1.975% 2.416% 2.0531169%
City San Marcos San Diego 0.089% 0.0733897%
City Santee San Diego 0.033% 0.0268401%
City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017% 0.0138564%
City Vista San Diego 0.052% 0.0425144%
Consolidated San Francisco San Francisco 3.026% 3.702% 3.1457169% County San Joaquin County San Joaquin 1.680% 2.055% 1.7460399% City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009% 0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053% 0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054% 0.0443454%
City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013% 0.0104219%
City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313% 0.383% 0.3256176%
City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084% 0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 0.816% 0.999% 0.8484126% City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024% 0.0199053%
City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029% 0.0240680%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) San Luis Obispo 0.043% 0.0353456% City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017% 0.0137881%
City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020% 0.0160922%
City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077% 0.0637841%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 318 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
11of15
County San Mateo County San Mateo 1.074% 1.313% 1.1159599% City Belmont San Mateo 0.021% 0.0169860%
City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019% 0.0152537%
City Daly City San Mateo 0.044% 0.0363880%
City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013% 0.0103982%
City Foster City San Mateo 0.020% 0.0166101%
City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004% 0.0031638%
City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013% 0.0110029%
City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015% 0.0126209%
City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013% 0.0105836%
City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016% 0.0130625%
City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056% 0.0463511%
City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021% 0.0172161%
City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013% 0.0108885%
City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052% 0.0425841%
City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043% 0.0353943%
County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 1.132% 1.385% 1.1768968% City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001% 0.0008938%
City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004% 0.0028969%
City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047% 0.0389379%
City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122% 0.1004559%
City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058% 0.0479179%
County Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2.404% 2.941% 2.4987553% City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014% 0.0112566%
City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008% 0.0066824%
City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025% 0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103338%
City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103220%
City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036% 0.0298120%
City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015% 0.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041% 0.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039% 0.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294% 0.360% 0.3054960%
City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067% 0.0549723%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 319 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
12of15
City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004% 0.0034161%
City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053% 0.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783% 0.957% 0.8135396% City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020% 0.0168191%
City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143% 0.1180348%
City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015% 0.0126525%
City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063% 0.0520136%
County Shasta County Shasta 1.095% 1.339% 1.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024% 0.0198896%
City Redding Shasta 0.284% 0.2334841%
City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004% 0.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228% 0.279% 0.2373393% County Solano County Solano 0.760% 0.6260795%
City Benicia Solano 0.031% 0.0253903%
City Dixon Solano 0.016% 0.0130849%
City Fairfield Solano 0.109% 0.0897317%
City Suisun City Solano 0.021% 0.0176183%
City Vacaville Solano 0.119% 0.0976497%
City Vallejo Solano 0.167% 0.1373644%
County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218% 1.490% 1.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032% 0.0266929%
City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081% 0.0667507%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Rohnert Park Sonoma 0.041% 0.0340759%
City Santa Rosa Sonoma 0.184% 0.1519070%
City Sonoma Sonoma 0.022% 0.0183438%
City Windsor Sonoma 0.016% 0.0129298%
County Stanislaus County Stanislaus 1.722% 1.4182273%
City Ceres Stanislaus 0.041% 0.0340260%
City Modesto Stanislaus 0.217% 0.1788759%
City Newman Stanislaus 0.006% 0.0046964%
City Oakdale Stanislaus 0.018% 0.0145531%
City Patterson Stanislaus 0.015% 0.0126590%
City Riverbank Stanislaus 0.010% 0.0085699%
City Turlock Stanislaus 0.065% 0.0531966%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 320 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
13of15
County Sutter County Sutter 0.306% 0.374% 0.3179548%
City Yuba City Sutter 0.074% 0.0606242%
County Tehama County Tehama 0.213% 0.261% 0.2216654%
City Red Bluff Tehama 0.014% 0.0117771%
County Trinity County Trinity 0.082% 0.101% 0.0855476%
County Tulare County Tulare 0.809% 0.990% 0.8410949%
City Dinuba Tulare 0.014% 0.0116929%
City Exeter Tulare 0.004% 0.0032479%
City Farmersville Tulare 0.003% 0.0027879%
City Lindsay Tulare 0.007% 0.0057111%
City Porterville Tulare 0.021% 0.0171845%
City Tulare Tulare 0.037% 0.0302273%
City Visalia Tulare 0.066% 0.0545872%
County Tuolumne County Tuolumne 0.486% 0.594% 0.5047621% County Ventura County Ventura 2.192% 2.681% 2.2781201%
City Camarillo Ventura 0.002% 0.0012815%
City Fillmore Ventura 0.002% 0.0020294%
City Moorpark Ventura 0.008% 0.0067337%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Oxnard Ventura 0.156% 0.190% 0.1617338%
City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021% 0.0174145%
City San Buenaventura (Ventura) Ventura 0.085% 0.0702181% City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014% 0.0119072%
City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065% 0.0533043%
City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022% 0.0179902%
County Yolo County Yolo 0.357% 0.437% 0.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055% 0.0451747%
City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066% 0.0544321%
City Woodland Yolo 0.058% 0.0477904%
County Yuba County Yuba 0.214% 0.262% 0.2225679%
City Marysville Yuba 0.014% 0.0112079%
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 321 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 2

CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political subdivisions eligible to participate in the Hikma Settlement and their counsel.

In light of the Order, and at the request of [SUBDIVISION], the [SUBDIVISION], its counsel [COUNSEL], and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of California, are entering into this California-Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop Agreement). [SUBDIVISION] and [COUNSEL] intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Hikma Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Hikma Settlement Agreement and CA Hikma Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Hikma Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL] from [SUBDIVISION’S] CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out
of the [SUBDIVISION’S] 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such payments, together with any contingency-fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Hikma Settlement Agreement. [COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Hikma Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State Back- Stop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Hikma Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 322 of 460 ends

1 Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 323 of 460 ends

1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds – Indivior Settlement

1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Indivior Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision thereto (the “Indivior Settlement Agreement”), including Section V and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the “CA Indivior Allocation Agreement”) to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections IV and V of the Indivior Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Sections IX or XIV of the Indivior Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Indivior Settlement Agreement. b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.

Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. (“Mylan”); Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.

Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 324 of 460 ends

2 3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the Indivior Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the Indivior Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section V(D)(1) of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section V(B)(2) of the Indivior Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California1 pursuant to Sections IX or XIV of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees, the Additional Remediation Amount, and the Settlement Product Cash Conversion Amount. 2

4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Indivior Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”).

A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed 1 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit. 2All Settlement Product Cash Conversion Amounts paid to California pursuant to Section XIV of the Indivior Settlement Agreement shall be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 325 of 460 ends

3 negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the “Local Allocation”). For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision, and will receive payments as provided in the Indivior Settlement Agreement. c) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the “Distributors Settlement”), that city’s Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the county’s share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight). d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share, with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 326 of 460 ends

4 however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State..
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the Indivior Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice-impacted youth, youth experiencing adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or (6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list. d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Indivior Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this CA Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 327 of 460 ends

5 Indivior Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Indivior Settlement Agreement or this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Indivior Settlement Agreement or this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

Page 328 of 460 ends

6 subject to any limits imposed by the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid- related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision Funds be used for litigation-related fees and expenses.

D. Provision for State Back-Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) (“MDL Fees Order”) in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) “cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee agreements at 15%.” Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement agreements with other Opioid Defendants.

A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency-fee counsel (“State Back-Stop Agreement”), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Indivior Settlement Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any payments to contingency-fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision’s total gross recovery under this Indivior Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments made under a State Back-Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid Abatement use requirements under Section V.B.1 of the Indivior Settlement Agreement. Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Indivior Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

To effectuate a State Back-Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into agreements presented in other forms.

For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or enter into a State Back-Stop Agreement, and no State Back-Stop Agreement shall impose any duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without limitation the Attorney General.
///
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 329 of 460 ends

7 5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State’s use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the settlement have been used in compliance with the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Indivior Settlement Agreement and this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the Indivior Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Indivior. e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Indivior Settlement Agreement, this CA Indivior Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 330 of 460 ends

8 Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Indivior Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Indivior Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 331 of 460 ends

9 The undersigned, Pittsburg city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Indivior Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Indivior Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds –Indivior Settlement.

Signature: /signer_1_som/
Name: /name_1_som/
Title: /title_1_som/
Date: /date_1_som/
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 332 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Indivior Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re-allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled “Weighted Allocation Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one- hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 333 of 460 ends

Page 334 of 460 ends

Page 335 of 460 ends

Page 336 of 460 ends

Page 337 of 460 ends

Page 338 of 460 ends

Page 339 of 460 ends

Page 340 of 460 ends

Page 341 of 460 ends

Page 342 of 460 ends

Page 343 of 460 ends

Page 344 of 460 ends

Page 345 of 460 ends

Page 346 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 2

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Indivior Settlement Agreement and CA Indivior Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Indivior Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL] from [SUBDIVISION’S] CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out of the [SUBDIVISION’S] 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such payments, together with any contingency-fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Indivior Settlement Agreement. [COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Indivior Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State Back- Stop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Indivior Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
1 Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 347 of 460 ends

1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds – Mylan Settlement

1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Mylan Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision thereto (the “Mylan Settlement Agreement”), including Section V and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the “CA Mylan Allocation Agreement”) to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections IV and V of the Mylan Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Section IX of the Mylan Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Mylan Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Mylan Settlement Agreement. b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California. CA Litigating Special Districts include Susanville Elementary School District and Lassen County Office of Education.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 348 of 460 ends

2 3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Mylan Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the Mylan Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the Mylan Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section V(D)(1) of the Mylan Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section V(B)(2) of the Mylan Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California1 pursuant to Section IX of the Mylan Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees and the Additional Remediation Amount.

4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Mylan Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”).

A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA 1 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 349 of 460 ends

3 Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the “Local Allocation”). For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision, and will receive payments as provided in the Mylan Settlement Agreement. c) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the “Distributors Settlement”), that city’s Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the county’s share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight). d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share, with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 350 of 460 ends

4 ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the Mylan Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice-impacted youth, youth experiencing adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or (6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list. d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Mylan Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 351 of 460 ends

5 Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Mylan Settlement Agreement or this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern. c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Mylan Settlement Agreement or this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid- related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 352 of 460 ends

6 However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision Funds be used for litigation-related fees and expenses.

A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency-fee counsel (“State Back-Stop Agreement”), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Mylan Settlement Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any payments to contingency-fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision’s total gross recovery under this Mylan Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments made under a State Back-Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid Abatement use requirements under Section V(B)(1) of the Mylan Settlement Agreement. Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Mylan Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

Page 353 of 460 ends

7 5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State’s use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the settlement have been used in compliance with the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Mylan Settlement Agreement and this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the Mylan Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Mylan. e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Mylan Settlement Agreement, this CA Mylan Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 354 of 460 ends

8 Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Mylan Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 355 of 460 ends

9 The undersigned, Pittsburg city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds –Mylan Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Mylan Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Mylan Settlement.

Signature: /signer_1_som/
Name: /name_1_som/
Title: /title_1_som/
Date: /date_1_som/
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 356 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Mylan Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 357 of 460 ends

Page 358 of 460 ends

Page 359 of 460 ends

Page 360 of 460 ends

Page 361 of 460 ends

Page 362 of 460 ends

Page 363 of 460 ends

Page 364 of 460 ends

Page 365 of 460 ends

Page 366 of 460 ends

Page 367 of 460 ends

Page 368 of 460 ends

Page 369 of 460 ends

Page 370 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 2

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Mylan Settlement Agreement and CA Mylan Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Mylan Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL] from [SUBDIVISION’S] CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out of the [SUBDIVISION’S] 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such payments, together with any contingency-fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the Attorney Fee Fund will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Mylan Settlement Agreement. [COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Mylan Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State Back- Stop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Mylan Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
1 Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 371 of 460 ends

1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds – Sun Settlement

1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Sun Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision thereto (the “Sun Settlement Agreement”), including Section VI and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the “CA Sun Allocation Agreement”) to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections V and VI of the Sun Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Section X of the Sun Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Sun Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Sun Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Sun Settlement Agreement. b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 372 of 460 ends

2 3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Sun Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the Sun Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA Sun Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Sun Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the Sun Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section VI(D)(1) of the Sun Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section VI(B)(2) of the Sun Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California1 pursuant to Section X of the Sun Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees and the Additional Remediation Amount.

4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Sun Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Sun Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”).

A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in 1 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 373 of 460 ends

3 Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the “Local Allocation”). For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision, and will receive payments as provided in the Sun Settlement Agreement. c) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the “Distributors Settlement”), that city’s Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the county’s share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight). d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share, with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Sun Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA Sun Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 374 of 460 ends

4 ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the Sun Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice-impacted youth, youth experiencing adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or (6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list. d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Sun Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA Sun Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 375 of 460 ends

5 Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA Sun Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Sun Settlement Agreement or this CA Sun Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern. c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Sun Settlement Agreement or this CA Sun Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement. e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA Sun Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid- related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 376 of 460 ends

6 However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision Funds be used for litigation-related fees and expenses.

A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency-fee counsel (“State Back-Stop Agreement”), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(Y), of the Sun Settlement Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any payments to contingency-fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision’s total gross recovery under this Sun Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments made under a State Back-Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid Abatement use requirements under Section VI(B)(1) of the Sun Settlement Agreement. Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Sun Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

Page 377 of 460 ends

7 5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State’s use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the settlement have been used in compliance with the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA Sun Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Sun Settlement Agreement and this CA Sun Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section VI(B)(2) of the Sun Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Sun.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Sun Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Sun Settlement Agreement, this CA Sun Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 378 of 460 ends

8 Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Sun Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Sun Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 379 of 460 ends

9 The undersigned, Pittsburg city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds –Sun Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Sun Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds –Sun Settlement.

Signature: /signer_1_som/
Name: /name_1_som/
Title: /title_1_som/
Date: /date_1_som/
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 380 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Sun Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 381 of 460 ends

Page 382 of 460 ends

Page 383 of 460 ends

Page 384 of 460 ends

Page 385 of 460 ends

Page 386 of 460 ends

Page 387 of 460 ends

Page 388 of 460 ends

Page 389 of 460 ends

Page 390 of 460 ends

Page 391 of 460 ends

Page 392 of 460 ends

Page 393 of 460 ends

Page 394 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 2

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Sun Settlement Agreement and CA Sun Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Sun Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL] from [SUBDIVISION’S] CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out of the [SUBDIVISION’S] 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such payments, together with any contingency-fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the Attorney Fee Fund will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Sun Settlement Agreement.
[COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Sun Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State Back- Stop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Sun Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
1 Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 395 of 460 ends

1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds – Zydus Settlement

1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Zydus Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2025, and any revision thereto (the “Zydus Settlement Agreement”), including Section VI and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the “CA Zydus Allocation Agreement”) to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections V and VI of the Zydus Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Section X of the Zydus Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Zydus Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Zydus Settlement Agreement. b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California.
c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 396 of 460 ends

2 3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Zydus Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the Zydus Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the Zydus Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section VI(D)(1) of the Zydus Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section VI(B)(2) of the Zydus Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California1 pursuant to Section X of the Zydus Settlement Agreement, including payments for Private Attorney Fees and the Additional Remediation Amount.

4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California, pursuant to the Zydus Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”).

A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in 1 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 397 of 460 ends

3 Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the “Local Allocation”). For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision, and will receive payments as provided in the Zydus Settlement Agreement. c) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the “Distributors Settlement”), that city’s Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to the city. If a city later changes or has already changed its distribution election in the Distributors Settlement, that change in election will apply here, provided that the change in election is received by the settlement administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the county’s share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight). d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share, with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 398 of 460 ends

4 ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the Zydus Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice-impacted youth, youth experiencing adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or (6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list. d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Zydus Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 399 of 460 ends

5 Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Zydus Settlement Agreement or this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern. c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Zydus Settlement Agreement or this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid- related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 400 of 460 ends

6 However, in no event shall more than one third (5% out of the 15%) of CA Subdivision Funds be used for litigation-related fees and expenses.

A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency-fee counsel (“State Back-Stop Agreement”), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Zydus Settlement Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, provided that: (1) such payments, together with any payments to contingency-fee counsel from the Private Attorneys Fee amount related to such Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision’s total gross recovery under this Zydus Settlement Agreement; and (2) the Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments made under a State Back-Stop agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid Abatement use requirements under Section VI(B)(1) of the Zydus Settlement Agreement. Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Zydus Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

Page 401 of 460 ends

7 5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State’s use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the settlement have been used in compliance with the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Zydus Settlement Agreement and this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section VI(B)(2) of the Zydus Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Zydus. e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Zydus Settlement Agreement, this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 402 of 460 ends

8 Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Zydus Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 403 of 460 ends

9 The undersigned, Pittsburg city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds –Zydus Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Zydus Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Zydus Settlement.

Signature: /signer_1_som/
Name: /name_1_som/
Title: /title_1_som/
Date: /date_1_som/
Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 404 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Zydus Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.

Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 405 of 460 ends

Page 406 of 460 ends

Page 407 of 460 ends

Page 408 of 460 ends

Page 409 of 460 ends

Page 410 of 460 ends

Page 411 of 460 ends

Page 412 of 460 ends

Page 413 of 460 ends

Page 414 of 460 ends

Page 415 of 460 ends

Page 416 of 460 ends

Page 417 of 460 ends

Page 418 of 460 ends

APPENDIX 2

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Zydus Settlement Agreement and CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Zydus Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL] from [SUBDIVISION’S] CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out of the [SUBDIVISION’S] 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such payments, together with any contingency-fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the Attorney Fee Fund will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Zydus Settlement Agreement. [COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Zydus Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State Back- Stop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Zydus Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
1 Docusign Envelope ID: 984CEEB7-4103-43AE-BC2C-457BA23653CB

Page 419 of 460 ends

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565

TO: Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Maria M. Aliotti - Interim City Manager

SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 2028 – Crestview Drive Safety Improvements as Complete and
Authorizing the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion

MEETING DATE: September 15, 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Project 2028 – Crestview Drive Safety Improvements (Project) installed pavement markings, raised medians, and pedestrian crossings at six intersections throughout the City. This resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT

The total anticipated expenditures for the Project, including design, staff time, construction, release of retention, and project closeout is $851,000. The total approved budget for the Project was $933,474.

Any unspent Project funds will be returned to the source funds. An updated CIP project sheet is attached to this report.

RECOMMENDATION

City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the Project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

Page 420 of 460 ends

BACKGROUND

Advertising for the Project began on July 3, 2024 and construction bids were opened on July 18, 2024.

On August 5, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14518, accepting the plans and specifications, and awarding a construction contract to RK Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $531,654.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS

This item was not presented to a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS

The Project successfully installed pavement markings, raised medians, and pedestrian crossings at six intersections along Crestview Drive at Nina Place, Alta Vista Circle, Kingsberry Place, Atherton Avenue, William Way and Crestview Lane. These improvements enhanced pedestrian safety, reduced vehicle speeds, and improved overall traffic flow along the corridor. Community feedback has been positive, particularly regarding increased visibility at crosswalks and reduced instances of unsafe turning movements.

The Project included five contract change orders in the amount of $93,922.46 for a total contract amount of $625,576.46.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
CIP Project Sheet

Report Prepared by: Tina Tan, Assistant Engineer

Page 421 of 460 ends

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG

In the Matter of:

Accepting Project 2028 - Crestview )
Drive Safety Improvements as Complete) RESOLUTION NO. 25- And Authorizing the City Engineer to )
File a Notice of Completion )

WHEREAS, Project 2028 – Crestview Drive Safety Improvements (Project) installed pavement markings, raised medians, and pedestrian crossings at six intersections along Crestview Drive at Nina Place, Alta Vista Circle, Kingsberry Place, Atherton Avenue, William Way, and Crestview Lane; and

WHEREAS, on August 5, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24- 14518, accepting the plans and specifications, and awarding a construction contract to RK Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $531,654; and

WHEREAS, during construction, there were a total of five contract change orders in the amount of $93,922.46 for a total contract amount of $625,576.46; and

WHEREAS, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project, including design, construction, and staff time charges are $851,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the Project as complete, authorizes the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, file said document with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within 10 days from the date hereof, and return any unspent Project funds to the source funds.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 15th day of September 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

____
Jelani Killings, Mayor

ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk

Page 422 of 460 ends

City of Pittsburg 2025/26 – 2029/30 Capital Improvement Program

Project Title: Project #:
(HSIP 10) Crestview Drive Safety Improvements 2028

Description/Justification:

The project is a state-only funded California Depar tment of Transportation (Caltrans) project. It enco mpasses six intersections along Crestview Drive with the primary goal of improving pedestrian safety and preventing vehicular speeding.

The project locations are Crestview Lane, William W ay, Atherton Ave, Kingsberry Place, Sunnyhill Way, and Nina Place. The scope of work includes, but is not limited to, upgr ading pavement markings, installing raised medians, upgrading pedestrian crossings with enhanced safety features.

Supplemental Information:

Funding Source: Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10 State Grant.

PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/ 27 2027/28 2028/29 TOTAL 1 1 01 Staff Time $9,500 $20,500 $28,000 $1,800 59,800 $ 21 22 Design $25,000 $49,500 74,500 $
2281 Construction $625,600 $31,300 656,900 $
2372 Administrative Overhead $8,900 $21,100 $28,000 $1,800 59,800 $ TOTAL 43,400 $ 91,100 $ 681,600 $ 34,900 $ 851,000 $ PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 202 7/28 2028/29 TOTAL Federal/State Funding $378,220 378,220 $
228 RMRA $41,180 41,180 $
203 HUTA $100,000 $51,700 151,700 $
233 CDBG $200,000 $162,374 362,374 $
TOTAL 719,400 $ 214,074 $ 933,474 $

PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Streets
Location: Crestview Drive from William Way to
Nina Place.

Project Manager: K. Labao
Project Priority: 1E – Essential
Project Status: Completed
Est. Completion Date: 2025/26

Page 423 of 460 ends

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565

TO: Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Maria M. Aliotti - Interim City Manager

SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting the Plans and Specifications and Awarding Project 3333 – California Theatre Restroom

MEETING DATE: September 15, 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Project 3333 – California Theatre Restroom (Project) is for the construction of an accessible backstage restroom for the California Theatre. Adoption of this resolution will accept the Project plans and specifications and award a construction contract to N G Builder Company.

FISCAL IMPACT

The proposal from N G Builder Company is $129,630 for the Project. Funding for construction will be provided by the existing Project budget. No additional funds are being requested.

The CIP Project Sheet is attached to this Staff Report.

RECOMMENDATION

City Council adopt the attached Resolution, accepting the plans and specifications and authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with N G Builder Company for a total amount not to exceed $129,630 for the construction of the Project.

Staff also recommends that the City Council allocate a construction contingency in the amount of $12,963 for any unanticipated costs and contract change orders.

Page 424 of 460 ends

Staff further recommends that the City Engineer be authorized to approve contract change orders for the Project in a total amount not to exceed 50% of the construction contingency and the City Manager be authorized to approve change orders in an amount not to exceed the approved Project budget.

BACKGROUND

On December 20, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-14033 accepting a $400,000 California Natural Resources Agency Grant for construction of a marque sign and accessible backstage restrooms.

On October 2, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14381 awarding Project 3333, California Theatre Marquee and Below Stage Modifications Phase I to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.

On May 6, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14469 accepting Project 3333, California Theater Marquee and Below Stage Modification Phase I, as complete for the marquee sign construction only.

On September 16, 2024, City Council adopted the Five-Year CIP for Fiscal Years 2024/25-2028/29 and reallocated $106,800 General Funds from Project 3324, California Theatre Phase 1 to the Project.

On August 7, 2025, staff advertised the Project for construction bids and N G Builder Company was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder with a base bid in the amount of $129,630.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS

An update of this Project was provided as part of the CIP presentation at the Infrastructure and Transportation Subcommittee meeting on August 28, 2025.

STAFF ANALYSIS

This Project will construct a new, accessible restroom in the backstage area of the California Theatre, a 1920’s qualified historic building. The venue hosts a variety of entertainment productions that would benefit from the construction of an accessible bathroom close to performers and dressing rooms.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
CIP Project Sheet

Report Prepared By: Tina Tan, Assistant Engineer

Page 425 of 460 ends

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG

In the Matter of:

Accepting the Plans and Specifications)
And Awarding Project 3333 ) RESOLUTION NO. 25- California Theatre Restroom )

WHEREAS, Project 3333 – California Theatre Restroom (Project) is for the construction of an accessible, backstage restroom at the California Theatre; and

WHEREAS, on December 20, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 21- 14033 accepting a $400,000 California Natural Resources Agency Grant for construction of a marque sign and accessible, backstage restrooms; and

WHEREAS, on May 6, 2024, the Phase 1 of Project 3333, California Theatre Marquee and Below Stage Modification was accepted as complete for a total cost of $223,800 for design, staff time and administrative overhead, and the construction of the marquee sign only; and

WHEREAS, on September 16, 2024, City Council adopted the Five-Year CIP for Fiscal Years 2024/25-2028/29 and reallocated $106,800 General Funds from Project 3324, California Theatre Phase 1 to the Project; and

WHEREAS, on August 7, 2025, staff advertised the Project for construction bids; and

WHEREAS, on August 28, 2025, three construction bids were received and N G Builder Company was determined to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder with a base bid in the amount of $129,630.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the plans and specifications, awards a construction contract to N G Builder Company, authorizes a contingency in the amount of $12,963, authorizes the City Engineer to approve contract change orders in an amount not to exceed 50% of the contingency, and authorizes the City Manager to approve change orders for an amount not to exceed the approved Project budget.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 15th day of September 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:
____
Jelani Killings, Mayor

ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk

Page 426 of 460 ends

City of Pittsburg 2025/26 – 2029/30 Capital Improvement Program

Project Title: Project #:

California Theater Marquee & Below Stage Modification 3333

Description/Justification:

The California Theater is a historic building in Downtown Pittsburg that has undergone several needed renovations in the past few years. The project will construct a new theater marquee, dressing room, and restroom facilities at the City’s California Theater.

Supplemental Information:

Funding Sources: California Natural Resources Agency Program State Grant and must be used before March 1st, 2026. Council approved Resolution 21-14033 on 12-20-21.

PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time 4,850$ 5,000$ 10,000$ 19,850$ 2122 Design 52,450$ 52,450$
2281 Construction 161,875$ 3,000$ 254,625$ 419,500$ 2372 Administrative Overhead 5,000$ 10,000$ 15,000$ TOTAL 166,725$ 65,450$ 274,625$ 506,800$ PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 TOTAL Federal/State Funding 400,000$ 400,000$
110 General Fund 106,800$ 106,800$
TOTAL 400,000$ 106,800$ 506,800$

PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Community Facilities
Location: California Theater
Project Manager: G. Haynes
Project Priority: 1E – Essential
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion
Date:
2025/26

Page 427 of 460 ends

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565

TO: Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Maria M. Aliotti - Interim City Manager

SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 2038 – Citywide Roadway Improvements as Complete and
Authorizing the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion

MEETING DATE: September 15, 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Project 2038 – Citywide Roadway Improvements (Project) installed and upgraded traffic advisory signs with new fluorescent sheeting, replaced damaged poles, and relocated existing signage to locations compliant with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). This resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT

The Project was funded by the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant. The total anticipated expenditures for the Project, including design, staff time, construction, release of retention, and project closeout is $2,844,485. The total approved budget for the Project was $2,965,700.

An updated CIP project sheet is attached to this report.

RECOMMENDATION

City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the Project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

Page 428 of 460 ends

BACKGROUND

On August 28, 2020, staff applied to Caltrans for an HSIP 10 grant to conduct and execute traffic safety studies and improvements at multiple locations within the city.

On August 16, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-13978, allocating the HSIP Cycle 10 Grant of $2,965,700 to the Project.

Advertising for the Project began on July 11, 2024 and construction bids were opened on August 1, 2024.

On August 19, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14523, accepting the plans and specifications, and awarding a construction contract to Pavement Coatings Co. for the amount of $1,837,109.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS

This item was not presented to a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS

The Project successfully upgraded traffic advisory signs and striping throughout the city to meet current standards. These upgrades enhance safety for both pedestrians and drivers by improving visibility and contributing to a safer and more navigable roadway system citywide.

During construction, there were a total of four contract change orders in the amount of $563,854 for a total contract amount of $2,400,963. The remaining balance will be used for the second phase of the Project.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
CIP Project Sheet

Report Prepared by: Tina Tan, Assistant Engineer

Page 429 of 460 ends

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG

In the Matter of:

Accepting Project 2038 - Citywide )
Roadway Improvements as Complete ) RESOLUTION NO. 25- And Authorizing the City Engineer to )
File a Notice of Completion )

WHEREAS, Project 2038 – Citywide Roadway Improvements (Project) installed and upgraded traffic advisory signs with new fluorescent sheeting, replaced damaged poles, and relocated existing signage to locations compliant with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD); and

WHEREAS, on August 16, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21- 13978, allocating the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10 Grant for $2,965,700 to the Project; and

WHEREAS, on July 11, 2024, staff advertised the Project for construction bids and construction bids were opened on August 1, 2024; and

WHEREAS, on August 19, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24- 14523, accepting the plans and specifications, and awarding a construction contract to Pavement Coatings Co. for the amount of $1,837,109; and

WHEREAS, during construction, there were a total of four contract change orders in the amount of $563,854 for a total contract amount of $2,400,963; and

WHEREAS, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project, including staff time, design, construction, release of retention, and project close out, are $2,844,485.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the Project as complete and authorizes the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and file said document with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within 10 days from the date hereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 15th day of September 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

____
Jelani Killings, Mayor

ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk

Page 430 of 460 ends

City of Pittsburg 2025/26 – 2029/30 Capital Improvement Program

Project Title: Project #:
(HSIP 10) Citywide Roadway Improvements 2038

Description/Justification:

This project will consist of the installation and/or upgrade of signs with new fluorescent sheeting, completion of a Citywide roadway safety signing audit and modifications to e dge-line and centerline striping. Project improveme nt locations are focused on various arterial roads such as Railroad Avenue, Willow Pass Road, Bailey Road, Pittsburg-Antioch Highway, East Leland Road, Loveridge Road, Buchanan Road, West 10 th Street, Harbor Street, North Parkside Drive, Calif ornia Avenue, Century Boulevard and East 14 th Street.

Supplemental Information:

Funding Sources Include: Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10 State Grant.

PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/ 28 2028/29 2029/30 TOTAL 1 1 01 Staff Time 35,764 $ 42,536 $ 1,719 $ 80,019 $ 21 22 Design 184,675 $ 184,675 $
2281 Construction 2,410,000 $ 111,072 $ 2,521,072 $ 2372 Administrative Overhead 23,521 $ 33,479 $ 1,719 $ 58,719 $ TOTAL 243,960 $ 2,486,015 $ 114,510 $ 2,844,485 $ PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 202 8/29 2029/30 TOTAL Federal/State Funding 2,965,700 $ 2,965,700 $
TOTAL 2,965,700 $ 2,965,700 $

PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Streets
Location: Citywide
Project Manager: K. Labao
Project Priority: 1A – Essential
Project Status: Completed
Est. Completion Date: 2025/26

Page 431 of 460 ends

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565

TO: Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Maria M. Aliotti - Interim City Manager

SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting the Military Equipment Annual Report, Determining the Use of
Equipment Complied with Policy 706, and Determining that Policy 706 will Continue

MEETING DATE: September 15, 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

State law requires the Police Department to provide the City Council with an annual report on military equipment use. On review of the report, the City Council determines whether use of the equipment complied with existing policy, and whether to continue with the policy or make any changes.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All equipment has been maintained within the approved Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating Budget and no new equipment authorizations are requested. Staff may increase each equipment category’s usage of up to an additional 20% to allow for greater operational efficiency, but this will not increase the approved FY 2025-26 Operating Budget.

RECOMMENDATION:

City Council adopt the resolution accepting the Military Annual Report, determining that the use of equipment complied with Policy 706, and determining Policy 706 will continue.

Page 432 of 460 ends

BACKGROUND:

Beginning 2022, new state law at Government Code Sections 7070-7075, required each city to adopt an ordinance approving a military equipment use policy before its police department may engage in specified activities. "Military equipment” is defined at Government Code Section 7070. The Police Department has “military equipment” in its inventory and engages in critical public safety activities in coordination with other local jurisdictions.

On May 2, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance 22-1500, adding Chapter 2.64 to the Pittsburg Municipal Code, approving Policy 706 Military Equipment Use Policy for Police Services.

State law further requires the Police Department to submit an annual report to the City Council. The City Council is required to review Policy 706 and the annual report, and determine whether the military equipment complies with specified standards. The City Council may determine that Policy 706 may continue without change, or direct staff to come back with specified changes. The law further requires that the annual report be made available on the Police Department website. Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Police Department is required to hold a community engagement meeting at which the public may discuss and ask questions. In compliance with the requirement, the Police Department brought this item to a Public Safety Subcommittee meeting earlier this year.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS:

This item was presented to the Public Safety Subcommittee and opened to public comment on June 4, 2025.

STAFF ANALYSIS:

Staff is seeking approval of the continued use of the equipment currently in the Police Department inventory by authorized and trained personnel when the use is necessary to maintain public safety. Policy approval would allow the continued collaboration with other law enforcement agencies in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the city. The Police Department works closely with other local, county, state and federal law enforcement agencies within Contra Costa County on police-related matters, including safeguarding the public’s welfare and safety, working on regional task forces, conducting training exercises, providing mutual aid, and responding to emergencies. In certain circumstances, there arises a need to deploy “military” equipment from, or lend military equipment to, outside entities to promote the safety and security of community members. A full inventory of the Police Department’s military equipment is contained in the Annual Report and is attached. Government Code §7071(d)(1) sets forth the findings that City Council must make to approve the policy. The City Council can make the required findings because:

Page 433 of 460 ends

1. Authorizing the use of military equipment is necessary when there is no reasonable alternative option that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. The acquisition and use of this equipment is part of the Pittsburg Police Department’s overall approach to Critical Incident Management, Use of Force, De-Escalation and public safety. The equipment will enable department members to properly respond to both planned and unplanned events efficiently and effectively.

2. The proposed Military Equipment Use Policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties by ensuring required reporting, the opportunity for community engagement and feedback, and transparency and oversight regarding the acquisition and use of the specified military equipment in the City of Pittsburg.

3. For the proposed equipment purchases, the equipment is reasonably cost effective when compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

4. Prior military equipment use has complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time.

For greater annual flexibility when addressing cost increases, maintenance, and training needs, staff will consider up to a 20% increase of costs under each equipment category when making a purchase or retaining services.

Attachments: Resolution
Military Equipment Annual Report

Report Prepared By: Steve Albanese, Chief of Police

Page 434 of 460 ends

Resolution No. 25- Page 1 of 2 September 15, 2025

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG

In the Matter of:

Accepting Military Equipment Annual Report, )
Determining the Use of Equipment Complied ) RESOLUTION NO. 25- With Policy 706, and Determining Policy 706 )
Will Continue )

WHEREAS, State law at California Government Code Sections 7070-75, as added by Assembly Bill 481 in 2021, requires each law enforcement agency to submit to the governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body; and

WHEREAS, on May 2, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance 22-1500, approving Policy 706 “Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition and Use”; and

WHEREAS, Government Code Section 7072 requires the Police Department to hold annually, at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the military equipment annual report; and

WHEREAS, Government Code 7071(e) requires the City Council to review Policy 706 and the military equipment annual report and determine whether each type of military equipment has complied with the following standards: 1) The military equipment identified in the Policy is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative option that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; 2) Policy 706 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties; 3) If purchasing the equipment identified in the Policy, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; and 4) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment that was in effect as the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance; and

WHEREAS, after reviewing the annual report and Policy 706, the City Council must vote whether to continue Policy 706 or direct staff to return to City Council with an amendment or replacement of Policy 706; and

WHEREAS, the annual report was presented to Public Safety Subcommittee on June 4, 2025.

Page 435 of 460 ends

Resolution No. 25- Page 2 of 2 September 15, 2025

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg accepts the military equipment annual report and determines the following: 1) The military equipment identified in the Policy is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative option that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; 2) Policy 706 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties; 3) If purchasing the equipment identified in the Policy, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; 4) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment that was in effect as the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council determines that the use of equipment complies with Policy 706 and that Policy 706 shall continue.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 15th day of September 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

__________________
Jelani Killings, Mayor

ATTEST BY:
_______
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk

Page 436 of 460 ends

PITTSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT
Professionalism
Excellence
Trust
65 CIVIC AVENUE PITTSBURG, CA 94565

Military Equipment

Annual Report
As required by
California Government Code Section 7072

January 1, 2024 – January 1, 2025

Prepared by: Lieutenant William Hatcher and Lieutenant Gabriel Palma

Page 437 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
2 Annual Report Summary

In 2021, the State Legislature passed, and the Governor signed Assembly Bill 481, adding Sections 7070-7075 to the California Government Code. The law required each law enforcement agency to obtain approval from the governing body, by ordinance, of a military equipment use policy. The City Council adopted the ordinance in 2022, adding Chapter 2.64 to the Pittsburg Municipal Code and approving Policy 706 “Military Equipment Funding, Acquisition and Use Policy.” The state law further requires the law enforcement agency to submit to the governing body an annual military equipment report. The governing body, i.e. the City Council, must determine, based on the report, whether the equipment has complied with the standards for approval.

Page 438 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
3 Military Equipment List
Annual Report for Calendar Year 2024

1. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

The unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is a battery powered, remote operated device. Flight time of approximately 30-45 minutes per battery, depending on weather and flight conditions. The UAV has also proven to be useful to public safety agencies in firefighting, search and rescue, pre- operational surveillance, and other tactical situations where aerial views enhance the safety and efficiency of law enforcement and fire personnel. i. DJI Matrice 210 V2, cost $20,000, quantity: 1.
ii. DJI Mavic Pro, (None Commissioned).
iii. DJI Mavic 2, cost $4,000, quantity: 2.
iv. DJI Mini 2, cost $800, quantity: 3.
b. Purpose:

To be deployed when its view would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
i. Major collision investigations
ii. Emergency Life Threatening Situations
iii. Search for missing persons
iv. Natural disaster management
v. Crime scene photography
vi. Special Weapons and Tactics, tactical or other public safety and life preservation missions
vii. In response to specific requests from local, state or federal fire authorities for fire response and/or prevention
c. Authorized Use:

Only assigned operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate Pittsburg Police Department’s UAV’s approved missions.
d. Expected Lifespan:

DJI Matrice 210 V2 - 5 years.

DJI Mavic Pro - 5 years.

DJI Mavic 2 - 5 years.

DJI Mini 2 - 5 years
e. Fiscal Impact:

Annual maintenance and operator training/licensing cost of approximately $5000-$6000.
f. Training:

Page 439 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
4 All Department UAV operators are licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration for UAV operation. UAV operators train quarterly in the use of the UAV’s.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules:

Use is established under the FAA Regulation 14 CFR Part 107 and the Pittsburg Police Department UAV policy #606. It is the policy of Pittsburg Police Department to utilize UAV’s only for official law enforcement purposes and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.

In 2024 the Pittsburg Police Department utilized Unmanned Arial Vehicles for a total of 207 flights during 59 deployments. The majority of deployments were in conjunction with the Pittsburg Police Department’s Special Response Unit for the purpose of perimeter security during high- risk operations. They were also utilized at a patrol level and for mutual aide when searching open areas for suspects who fled from police.

No additional UAVs were purchased or replaced during this calendar year.

Maintenance costs were maintained within budget.

A review of the UAV deployments found all flights were conducted within Pittsburg Police Department policies and standards.

2. Armored Personnel Carrier
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

The Armored Group LLC BATT (Ballistically Armored Tactical Transport), cost: $175,000, quantity: 1. The BATT is designed to withstand multiple bullet strikes from small arms fire as well as low level explosions.

Equipped with emergency lights/siren and a public address system.

Common uses for the BATT include citizen and officer rescues, evacuations, and the deployment of officers and chemical agents. The BATT is deployed for potentially armed or high-risk encounters by trained members of the Pittsburg Police Department.
b. Purpose:

To be used in response to critical incidents to enhance officer and community safety, improve scene containment and stabilization, and assist in resolving critical incidents.
c. Authorized Use:

The use of the BATT shall only be used/operated by authorized members of the Pittsburg Police Department who have been trained in the use of this vehicle.
d. Expected Lifespan:
25 years
e. Fiscal Impact:

Annual maintenance cost of approximately $5,000

Page 440 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
5 f. Training:

All driver/operators shall attend formalized instruction and be trained in vehicle operations and practical driving instruction.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules:

Use is established under Pittsburg Police Department policy #703. It is the policy of this Department to utilize armored vehicles for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law.

In 2024 the Pittsburg Police Department utilized the Armored Personnel Carrier a total of 8 times. 5 deployments were conducted as part of preplanned high-risk search warrants served by the Pittsburg Police Department’s Special Response Unit. There was 1 Special Response Unit deployment on a barricaded hostage incident. There were 2 supplemental patrol deployments for ballistic security on firearm related details.

No additional Armored Personnel purchases were made during this calendar year. Maintenance costs were maintained within budget.

A review of the Armored Personnel Carrier deployments determined each utilization was conducted within Pittsburg Police Department’s policies and standards.

Page 441 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
6 Command and Control Vehicle
h. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:
2007 Wells Cargo Model EW3225W Command Center Trailer, cost:
$35,000, quantity: 1. This vehicle is a large trailer used as a command center during prolonged incidents. The trailer contains desk space, a meeting area, generator, and bathroom.
i. Purpose:

To be used in response to critical incidents to be used as a command center.
j. Authorized Use:

The use of the trailer is limited to trained members of the Pittsburg Police Department.
k. Expected Lifespan:
20 years
l. Fiscal Impact:

Annual maintenance and driver training cost of approximately $2500.00 m. Training:

All driver/operators shall attend formalized instruction and be trained in vehicle operations and practical driving instruction.
n. Legal and Procedural Rules:

Use is established under Pittsburg Police Department policy #703. It is the policy of this Department to utilize the command vehicle for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law.

Command and Control Vehicle
o. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:
2015 Forrest River 14-foot enclosed trailer, cost $15,000, quantity: 1. This enclosed trailer has been modified with desks, computers, and monitors making it a platform the Crisis Negotiation Team uses to operate during a critical incident.
p. Purpose:

To be used in response to critical incidents for Crisis Negotiation Team purposes
q. Authorized Use:

The command trailer shall be used by officers who have been trained in its deployment and use.
r. Expected Lifespan:
20 years
s. Fiscal Impact:

Annual maintenance and driver training cost of approximately $1,500 t. Training:

All driver/operators shall attend a formalized instruction and be trained in vehicle operations and practical driving instruction.

Page 442 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
7 u. Legal and Procedural Rules:

In 2024 the Pittsburg Police Department utilized the Command-and- Control Vehicle a total of 5 times. All deployments were in support of DUI checkpoints conducted throughout the City of Pittsburg.

No additional Command and Control Vehicles were purchased during this calendar year. Maintenance costs were maintained within budget.

Each deployment was reviewed and found to be within the Pittsburg Police Department’s policies and standards.

3. Specialized Firearms and Ammunition
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

Guns that are fired from shoulder level, having a long spirally grooved barrel intended to make bullets spin and thereby have a greater accuracy over a long distance and Less Lethal launcher for deploying Kinetic Energy Munition.
i. Colt AR-15/M4 semi-automatic rifle for patrol use, cost $16485, quantity: 15.
ii. Colt AR-15/M4 semi-automatic rifle for SWAT use, cost $6,594, quantity: 6.
iii. LWRC M4 semi-automatic rifle for SWAT use, cost $14,034, quantity: 6.
iv. PWS MK111 M4 semi-automatic rifle for patrol use, cost $6,147, quantity: 3.
v. COLT AR-10 semi-automatic rifle for SWAT use, cost $2,800, quantity: 2.
vi. GA Precision GAP-10 Gen 2 6.5 Creedmoor semi-automatic rifle for SWAT use, cost $7,580, quantity: 2.
vii. Brugger and Thomet AG APC9KSD2 9mm for SIU use, cost $10,047, quantity: 3.
viii. Defense Technology 40MM launcher, cost $18,715, quantity:

19. ix. Winchester 5.56x45mm 55 grain FMJ ammunition, cost $2,784, quantity 8,000 rounds.
x. Winchester 223 Remington 64 grain power point ammunition, cost $992, quantity: 2,000 rounds.
xi. Hornady .308 Winchester 168 grain, cost $489, quantity: 400 rounds.

Page 443 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
8 xii. CTS 4557-40MM Kinetic Sponge Baton round, $1,463, quantity: 70. For patrol and SWAT use.

b. Purpose:

To be used as precision weapons to address a threat with more precision and/or greater distances than a handgun, if present and feasible. c. Authorized Use:

Only members that are POST certified are authorized to use a rifle, and 40MM launcher.
d. Expected Lifespan:

Colt AR-15/M4 rifle- 20 years
Remington 700 rifle- 20 years
Defense Technology 40MM launcher- 20 years
Winchester 5.56x45mm 55 grain FMJ ammunition- No expiration Winchester 223 Remington 64 grain power point ammunition- No expiration
Hornady .308 Winchester 168 grain- No expiration
CTS 4557-40MM Kinetic Sponge Baton round- No expiration e. Fiscal Impact:

Annual maintenance for firearms and 40mm launchers is approximately $3000. Although there is minimal maintenance associated with ammunition and 40mm projectiles, costs associated with annual purchases is approximately $35,000.
f. Training:

Prior to the use of the specialized firearms listed within this section, all officers must be certified by POST instructors in the maintenance and operation of such firearms.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules:

Use is established under Pittsburg Police policy #306 and 303.9. It is the policy of this Department to utilize specialized firearms only for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

In 2024 a total of 5,000 specified rounds were fired in a training capacity only. This was through new hire orientation, annual departmental and Special Response Unit trainings and courses throughout the year.

No specified rounds were fired in a public service capacity.

Page 444 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
9 5. Diversionary Device “Flashbangs”
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

A Noise Flash Diversionary Devices (NFDD) is a device that creates a bright flash and loud sound to temporarily divert the attention of subjects in the immediate area. NFDD are used to distract and temporarily incapacitate dangerous suspects by overwhelming their senses of vision and hearing. The distraction allows officers to seize a moment of opportunity to take control of the high-risk situations.

Combined Tactical Systems (CTS) Distraction Device, cost $3,077, quantity: 62.
b. Purpose:

To produce atmospheric over-pressure and brilliant white light and, as a result, can cause short-term (6-8 seconds) physiological/psychological sensory deprivation to give officers a tactical advantage. c. Authorized Use:

Diversionary Devices shall only be used:
i. By SWAT team members who have been trained in their proper use.
ii. In hostage and barricaded subject situations.
iii. In high-risk warrant (search/arrest) services where there may be extreme hazards to officers.
iv. During other high-risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety.
v. During training exercises.
d. Expected Lifespan:
5 years

e. Fiscal Impact:

Minimal cost associated with staff time to order and store. Cost associated with annual ordering is approximately $3,500.

f. Training:

Prior to use, officers must attend divisionary device training that is conducted by POST certified instructors.

g. Legal and Procedural Rules:

It is the policy of this Department to utilize diversionary devices only for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

In 2024 members of the Pittsburg Police Department’s Special Response Unit deployed a total of 18 diversionary devices. 10 were deployed during the service of 6 high risk warrant details. No injuries or damage were

Page 445 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
10 reported as a result of these deployments. A total of 6 diversionary devices were deployed as part of routine training.

All deployments were reviewed and documented in After-Action Reports and found to be within the policies and standards of the Pittsburg Police Department.

6. Chemical Agents “Tear Gas”
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

Chemical agent munitions, which are commonly referred to as “tear gas,” are used by the Pittsburg Police Department as a non-lethal tool to disperse rioting suspects and/or barricaded suspects. CS (2- Chlorobenzylidenemalonoitrile) and OC (Oleoresin Capsicum) are commonly used by law enforcement agencies across the United States.

CS is an irritating agent and lachrymator (irritates the eyes and causes tears to flow). CS has been medically tested in the UK and US, specifically by the U.S. Army. There are no known allergic reactions to CS. OC was de-regulated in California in 1996, is endorsed by the FBI, and is available to civilians to legally possess (2.5oz or less). OC is an inflammatory agent which causes involuntary closure of eyes (open 2-5 minutes) and respiratory inflammation (subsides in approximately 2 minutes). i. Defense Technology eXact Impact 40MM, cost $4,056, quantity:
125.
ii. Defense Technology eXact Impact 40MM CS, cost $1,720, quantity: 53.
iii. Defense Technology 40mm ferret liquid CS, cost $2,118, quantity:

71. iv. Defense Technology Riot CS (82 grams), cost $298, quantity: 9 v. Defense Technology CTS OC Vapor Canister, cost $238, quantity: 5
vi. Defense Technology CTS CS Vapor Canister, cost $667, quantity: 14
vii. Defense Technology CTS Inert Smoke, cost $194, quantity 6.

b. Purpose:

To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
i. Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. ii. Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
iii. Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. iv. Potentially vicious animals.

Page 446 of 460 ends

Pittsburg Police Department Equipment List
11 v. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
c. Authorized Use:

Only officers who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents.
d. Expected Lifespan:

All Chemical Agents have a lifespan of 5 years before being designated for training use only.
e. Fiscal Impact:

Minimal cost associated with staff time to order and store. Cost associated with annual ordering is approximately $9,500.

f. Training:

Officers utilizing chemical agent canisters are certified by POST less lethal and chemical agent instructors.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules:

Use is established under Pittsburg Police policy #303.6. It is the policy of this Department to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

In 2024 the Pittsburg Police Department’s Special Response Unit deployed chemical agents on one incident involving a barricaded hostage situation.

The utilization of chemical agents was documented in a criminal police report as well as an After-Action report and was found to be within the policies and standards of the Pittsburg Police Department. No injuries were reported as a result of the chemical agent deployment.

All other chemical agent deployments were utilized in a training capacity only.

Page 447 of 460 ends

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565

TO: Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Jennifer Brizel - Director of Human Resources

SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Appointing Maria Aliotti as Interim City Manager

MEETING DATE: September 15, 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The proposed action adopts a Resolution appointing Maria Aliotti as Interim City Manager.

FISCAL IMPACT

This appointment includes a five percent salary increase for Ms. Aliotti's service as Interim City Manager and reflects the additional responsibilities Ms. Aliotti will perform in this capacity during the recruitment period. The costs associated with this interim appointment have been budgeted in the adopted Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating Budget and will be absorbed by the salary savings associated with the vacant City Manager position.

RECOMMENDATION

The City Council adopt the resolution appointing Maria Aliotti as Interim City Manager.

BACKGROUND

City Manager Garrett Evans retired on September 4, 2025. The City Council is in the process of conducting a nationwide search for a new City Manager. During the recruitment and selection period for the City Manager, appointment of an Interim City Manager is customary to ensure operational continuity.

Page 448 of 460 ends

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS

This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS

Assistant City Manager Maria Aliotti will assume City Manager responsibilities effective Friday, September 5, 2025, following the retirement of City Manager Garrett Evans.

Aliotti brings over 23 years of dedicated service to the City of Pittsburg, with notable contributions to redevelopment, municipal planning, budget development, and strategic initiative implementation. Most recently, she played a key leadership role in presenting and guiding the adoption of the City’s FY 2025–26 Operating Budget.

During Aliotti’s time in Pittsburg, she has served as an Administrative Analyst, Project Manager, Redevelopment/Development Manager, Director of Community Services, and for the past five years, as Assistant City Manager, bringing executive leadership experience to her new role as Interim City Manager. Aliotti also served on the California Redevelopment Association Brownfields Committee.

The City Council has engaged Peckham & McKenney, a recognized executive search firm, to assist in the recruitment of a permanent City Manager. The recruitment is actively underway, with applications accepted through September 14, 2025. The City Council anticipates completing the recruitment and appointment process in the fall of this year.

A five percent salary increase is recommended in light of the additional responsibility that will be assumed as Interim City Manager.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution

Report Prepared By: Jennifer Brizel, Director of Human Resources

Page 449 of 460 ends

Resolution No. 25- Page 1 of 2 September 15, 2025

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG

In the Matter of:

Appointment of Maria Aliotti as )
Interim City Manager and Authorizing a) RESOLUTION NO. 25- Temporary Salary Increase )

WHEREAS, with the retirement of City Manager Garrett Evans effective September 4, 2025, it is appropriate to appoint an Interim City Manager until the recruitment for a new City Manager concludes, the Council appoints a City Manager, and employment commences; and

WHEREAS, Assistant City Manager Maria Aliotti has the requisite experience to perform the duties of Interim City Manager; and

WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City provide a five percent salary increase to Ms. Aliotti as fair compensation for the additional duties to be undertaken as Interim City Manager; and

WHEREAS, the costs associated with this interim appointment have been budgeted in the adopted Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating Budget under the City Manager’s Office, and will be absorbed by the salary savings associated with the City Manager vacancy; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby resolves that Maria Aliotti is appointed as Interim City Manager effective September 5, 2025, to serve at will and until such time the City Council appoints a City Manager and the appointee's employment commences with the City, the City Council terminates her service as Interim City Manager, or Ms. Aliotti informs the City Council that she no longer wishes to serve in the capacity of Interim City Manager.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City shall increase the salary of Ms. Aliotti by five percent (5%) over the top salary step for the position as Assistant City Manager during her service as Interim City Manager.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, except as otherwise modified by this Resolution, Ms. Aliotti will be subject to the same terms and conditions of employment as set forth in the Senior Executive Team Salary and Benefits Schedule, as well as in all applicable Council and Administrative Policies.

Page 450 of 460 ends

Resolution No. 25- Page 2 of 2 September 15, 2025

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 15th day of September 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

____
Jelani Killings, Mayor

ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk

Page 451 of 460 ends

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565

TO: Chair and Governing Board Members

FROM: Maria M. Aliotti - Interim Executive Director

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Pittsburg Power Company Resolution Approving the 2024 Annual Power Source Disclosure Report to the California Energy Commission

MEETING DATE: September 15, 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

California Public Utilities Code Section 398.1 requires all retail suppliers of electricity products to file an annual report with the California Energy Commission (CEC) disclosing resources or fuel types of power procured and sold to end-use customers.

Pittsburg Power Company (PPC) provides electricity retail service on Mare Island, Vallejo, under the name of Island Energy (IE) and is required by law to disclose the sources of its energy procurement and sales to its end users on Mare Island. The CEC requires the Governing Board of PPC to approve its 2024 Annual Power Source Disclosure (PSD) Report.

FISCAL IMPACT

Approval of the 2024 Annual Power Source Disclosure Report has no fiscal impact on the PPC or IE Enterprise Funds, or the City of Pittsburg General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION

The Governing Board of the Pittsburg Power Company adopt the attached Resolution approving the 2024 Annual Power Source Disclosure Report, and attesting that the information contained in the report is true and accurate, and that the energy procured by PPC was sold once and only once to end-use customers on Mare Island, Vallejo.

Page 452 of 460 ends

Pittsburg City CouncilSeptember 15, 2025

Pittsburg City Council
September 15, 2025