National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) The NPDES Program is a federal program which has been delegated to the State of California for implementation through the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Regional Water Boards), collectively Water Boards. In California, NPDES permits are also referred to as waste discharge requirements (WDRs) that regulate discharges to waters of the United States.
There are no Capital Projects planned for the NPDES Fund for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Public Education and Government Fund (PEG)
The Public Education and Government is a special revenue fund in which the City is given authority from California Public Utilities Code to levy State Franchise Holder. The revenue of this fund supports Public Education and Government channel facilities.
There are no Capital Projects planned for the PEG Fund for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Solid Waste Fund
Under the Recycling Center and Transfer Stations (RCTS) operating agreement with the Contra Costa Waste Service, Inc. (CCWS), the City receives a Recycling and Inspection Fee of a flat rate plus annual CPI adjustment on all solid waste and recycled material accepted at the transfer station. Solid Waste Management creates and implements programs and services for schools, City offices, businesses, and the community by promoting waste prevention, reuse, and recycling to meet the state mandated, AB 939 (50 percent waste diversion requirements.
There are no Capital Projects planned for the Solid Waste Fund for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Gas Tax Fund (RMRA) Senate Bill 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, was signed into law on April 28, 2017. SB 1 increased the per gallon fuel excise taxes; increased the diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration fees; and provides for inflationary adjustments to tax rates in future years. This legislative package invests $54 billion over the next decade to fix roads, freeways, and bridges in communities across California and puts more dollars toward transit and safety. These funds are split equally between state and local investments.
Beginning November 1, 2017, the State Controller (Controller) deposited various portions of this new funding into the newly created RMRA. A percentage of this new RMRA funding will be apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties.
Current and Projected RMRA Funding Availability: Fund 202 Category Description:
Project
Number CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Zone 7 Pavement Management 2043 $ 1,900,000
Pavement Management Program TBD $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 Zone 7 Pavement Management Phase II TBD $ 1,900,000
$ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 Roadway
Infrastructure
CIP Expenditures
RMRA (202)
23
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program supports community development activities to build stronger and more resilient communities. To support community development, activities are identified through an ongoing process. Activities may address needs such as infrastructure, economic development projects, public facilities installation, community centers, housing rehabilitation, public services, clearance/acquisition, microenterprise assistance, code enforcement, homeowner assistance, etc.
Current and Projected CDBG Funding Availability: Fund 233 Local Traffic Mitigation Fund (LTMF)
These fees are collected from developers to pay for the developer’s share of impacts to streets and traffic flow within the city. These funds are restricted to projects that are included in the current traffic mitigation study.
Current and Projected LTMF Funding Availability: Fund 303 Park Dedication Fees (PDF)
Park Dedication Fees are collected from developers to provide for construction of new parks and recreation facilities. Fees are collected based on the market value of the property, size of development, and number of units. These funds are restricted to new park construction and expansion and rehabilitation of existing parks.
Current and Projected PDF Funding Availability: Fund 304 There are no Capital Projects planned for the PDF Fund for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Pittsburg Regional Traffic Mitigation Fund (PRTMF)
These fees are collected from developers to pay for developer’s share of regional projects to mitigate impacts to streets and traffic flow. These funds are restricted to projects that are included in the current regional fee program.
There are no Capital Projects planned for the PRTMF Fund for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Bailey Road Maintenance
In 1990, Contra Costa County issued a use permit to the Keller Canyon Landfill Company to establish and operate a sanitary landfill in unincorporated Contra Costa County. Vehicles accessing the landfill site must use Bailey Road, portions of which are within the City of Pittsburg. The Landfill Operator was required, under the County’s permit, to pay surcharges on each ton of material collected at the site for maintenance of Bailey Road between Highway 4 interchange and the entrance to the Landfill.
Current and Projected Bailey Road Maintenance Funding Availability: Fund 312 Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Linscheid Drive Traffic Calming Phase I & II 4079 $ 280,236 $ 366,833 2026/27 CDBG Curb Ramp Installation Project TBD $ 10,000 $ 280,236 $ 376,833 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Roadway
Infrastructure
CDBG (233)
CIP Expenditures
Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 BART Pedestrian/Bicycle Connectivity 2019 $ 2,289,000
Bailey Road Improvements Phase I 2041 $ 150,000 $ 493,200 $ 2,439,000 $ - $ 493,200 $ - $ - $ -
Local Traffic Mitigation Fund (LTMF) (303)
CIP Expenditures
Roadway
Infrastructure
24
Infrastructure Repair and Replacement Fund (IRRF)
On January 22, 2013, the City Council adopted Ordinance 12-1363, also known as the Fiscal Sustainability Ordinance. This ordinance established minimum balances for financial reserves used to stabilize the City’s budget and created an Infrastructure Repair and Replacement Fund that receives a portion of funds that exceed the required reserve amount. This fund may be used for repairs and capital improvements projects related to the City’s infrastructure including streets, roads, parking lots, and storm drains.
There are no Capital Projects planned for the IRRF Fund for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Water Operations Fund (WOF)
The Water Fund is maintained by a service charge that is collected in water service bills. Fees collected vary by size of water meter and water use. These funds are used for installing, upgrading, and maintaining the City’s water system. Per Ordinance 12-1363 a minimum of 30% of annual operating costs shall be maintained in reserve.
Current and Projected Water Revenue Bond Proceeds: Fund 500 Current and Projected Water Operations Fund Funding Availability: Fund 501 Current and Projected Funding Availability Various WFR Accounts:
Water Facility Reserve Fund (WFR) Treatment and Distribution The Water Facility Reserve is funded by a onetime charge per residential unit paid by developers. The amount of the fee varies according to the location of the development and is calculated according to a formula described in the fee schedule approved by the City Council (Resolution 05-1029 and as amended by Resolution 12-11778).
This fund is used for expansion and upgrade of the water distribution system or treatment plant to account for increased use with new development.
Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Roadway
Infrastructure Bailey Road Pavement Maintenance 2049 $ 2,080,000 CIP Expenditures $ 2,080,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Bailey Road Maintenance (312) Category Description: Project Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 West Santa Fe Ave. Sewer Water Rehabilitation
Phase I 5003 $ 6,142,000
Water System Reliability (Cabrillo Place
Waterline) 5006 $ 2,822,916
WTP Capital Repairs and Improvements 5065 $ 325,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Water Treatment Plant Filtration
Improvements & Hypochlorite Conversion
5067 $ 8,691,188 $ 2,265,000
West Santa Fe Ave. Sewer Water Rehabilitation
Phase II
TBD $ 250,000 $ 3,000,000
Corporation Yard Groundwater Monitoring
Wells
3118 $ 759,100
Highlands Ranch Tank Improvements 5007 $ 705,000
Buchanan Pump Station Electrical Repairs TBD $ 380,000
$ 19,445,204 $ 2,670,000 $ 25,000 $ 275,000 $ 3,025,000 $ 25,000 Underground
Infrastructure
Community
Facilities
Water Operations Fund (WOF) (501)
CIP Expenditures
25
Current and Projected WFR Treatment Plant Funding Availability: Fund 502 Current and Projected WFR Distribution Funding Availability: Fund 503 Current and Projected WFR P.S. & Reservoir Funding Availability: Fund 506 Current and Projected WFR Funding Availability: Fund 507 There are no Capital Projects planned for the WFR Fund for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Current and Projected WFR Sludge Handling Funding Availability: Fund 509 Sewer Operations Fund (SOF)
The Sewer Fund is maintained by a service charge that is collected in water service bills. Fees collected vary by property use. These funds are used for installing, upgrading, and maintaining the City’s sewer system. Per Ordinance 12-1363 a minimum of 30% of annual operating costs shall be maintained in reserve.
Current and Projected Sewer Operations Fund Funding Availability: Fund 521 Sewer Facility Reserve Fund (SFR) Collection System Capacity Buy In The Sewer Facility Reserve is funded by a one-time charge per residential unit paid by developers. The amount of the fee varies according to the location of the development and is calculated according to a formula described Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Underground
Infrastructure
Water Treatment Plant Filtration
Improvements & Hypochlorite Conversion 5067 $ 1,910,000 CIP Expenditures $ 1,910,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Water Facility Reserves (WFR) - Water Treatment Expansion (502) Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Underground
Infrastructure
Water Treatment Plant Filtration
Improvements & Hypochlorite Conversion 5067 $ 1,988,000 CIP Expenditures $ 1,988,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Water Facility Reserves (WFR) - Distribution (503)
Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Underground
Infrastructure
Water Treatment Plant Filtration
Improvements & Hypochlorite Conversion 5067 $ 745,000
CIP Expenditures $ 745,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Water Facility Reserves (WFR) - P.S. & Reservoir (506)
Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Underground
Infrastructure
Water Treatment Plant Filtration
Improvements & Hypochlorite Conversion 5067 $ 1,083,000 CIP Expenditures $ 1,083,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Water Facility Reserves (WFR) - Sludge Handling (509) Category Description: Project Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 West Santa Fe Ave. Sewer and Water
Rehabilitation Phase I 5003 $ 7,708,530 $ 1,100,000
Loveridge Road Sanitary Sewer Pipe Re-line TBD $ 165,000 Terry Court Sewer Repair 5130 $ 80,000 $ 580,000
Corporation Yard Groundwater Monitoring
Wells
3118 $ 759,000
West Santa Fe Ave. Sewer and Water
Rehabilitation Phase II TBD $ 250,000 $ 4,000,000
$ 8,712,530 $ 580,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 250,000 $ 4,000,000 $ - Underground
Infrastructure
CIP Expenditures
Sewer Operation Fund (SOF) (521)
26
in the fee schedule approved by the City Council (Resolution No. 05-10291 and as amended by 05-10372). This fund is used for expansion and upgrade of the sewer system to account for increased usage with new development.
There are no Capital Projects planned for the SFR Fund for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Waterfront Operations (WO)
On January 1, 2012, California’s SB 551 took effect, granting certain tidelands and submerged land to the City of Pittsburg. These lands were previously managed by the State Lands Commission, which leased certain portions for waterfront commercial and industrial development. The leases will convert to agreements with the City, generating revenue on an annual basis, to be used to facilitate development of the waterfront for commercial, industrial, and recreational use. Per Ordinance 12-1363 a minimum of 30% of annual operating costs shall be maintained in the fund reserve.
Current and Projected Waterfront Operations Funding Availability: Fund 540 Waterfront Grant Funds
The Waterfront Grant Fund is comprised of various grants obtained by City staff for waterfront projects.
There are no Capital Projects planned for the Waterfront Grant Funds for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Marina Enterprise Fund (ME)
The Marina Enterprise Fund is composed of funds collected at the Pittsburg Marina from boat slip rentals and gasoline sales. These funds are used to maintain and improve the various marina facilities. Per Ordinance 12- 1363 a minimum of 30% of annual operating costs shall be maintained in reserve.
Current and Projected Marina Enterprise Fund Funding Availability: Fund 550 Island Energy (IE)
The U.S. Navy awarded Pittsburg Power a franchise service agreement to provide electric and natural gas retail services on Mare Island in Vallejo. In a special arrangement, Pittsburg Power Company established and does business as “Island Energy” on Mare Island. Island Energy has been providing Mare Island customers with dependable electric and gas services at competitive pricing since 1997. Island Energy is a potential revenue source for Capital Improvement Projects.
Current and Projected Island Energy Funding Availability: Fund 580 Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Marina Sheds A - D Upgrades 5517 $ 291,200
CIP Expenditures $ 291,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Marina Enterprise Fund (550)
27
Pittsburg Power Fund
The Pittsburg Power Company (PPC) is a municipal utility formed under the California Constitution. The PPC does business in the City of Pittsburg and as Island Energy (IE) on Mare Island located in Vallejo, California. PPC develops revenue streams for the City of Pittsburg while retaining existing businesses and attracting new business. Island Energy distributes natural gas and electricity to the industries, schools, businesses, and residents on Mare Island. Island Energy’s focus is to build capital asset value and income for the City of Pittsburg as Mare Island is redeveloped over time.
There are no Capital Projects planned for the Pittsburg Power Fund for FY 2026/27-2030/31.
Building Maintenance Fund (BMF)
The City’s Building Maintenance Fund covers ongoing maintenance of City-owned buildings.
Federal/State Funding
Federal grants help state and local governments finance many public services. But agencies must ensure effective management and oversight of these grants. The federal government awards hundreds of billions of dollars in grants to state and local governments each year. These grants help finance a broad range of services, including health care, education, social services, infrastructure, and public safety. Some of the grants that the city has obtained for infrastructure improvement or development include:
o Highway Safety Improvements Program (HSIP)
o TDA Grant
o OBAG 2/3
o CalRecycle
o Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
o PASS Grant
o Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)
o FEMA
o Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Trail Facilities (PBTF)
Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Duct Bank/Vault Replacements 5816 $ 725,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 125,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Waterfront Area Reliability 5820 $ 825,000 $ 125,000 $ 150,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Outage Recovery 5821 $ 330,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 RA Replacement 5826 $ 60,000 $ 50,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Electrical Substation Battery Replacement 5827 $ 80,000 $ 40,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Residential Gas Isolation Valves Installation 5828 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 80,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Electrical System "SKM Modeling" and 5829 $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Island Energy Electrical Substations Protection
Reinforcement
TBD $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 55,000
$ 2,305,000 $ 590,000 $ 650,000 $ 640,000 $ 610,000 $ 610,000 Power
Island Energy Fund (580)
CIP Expenditures
28
Current and Projected Federal/State Grant Funding Availability:
Other Potential Funding Sources
Occasionally the City receives funding from a unique source that does not occur very often. These specific funding sources do not have a designated fund but are still utilized to fund projects. Some of these unique funding sources for our current projects include:
• Developer Funding (direct developer contributions)
• ECCRFAA
• CCTA Funds
• Water Bond (2022A)/Water Bond Proceeds
Current and Projected Other Funding Availability:
Unfunded Needs
The City utilizes funds from varying sources to allocate to projects, with many factors contributing to the selection of each project and its prioritization. The projects specified below do not have a designated funding source but are anticipated future ventures.
Category Description: Project
Number
CURRENT FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 BART Pedestrian/Bicycle Connectivity 2019 $ 5,228,000
Harbor Street Safety Improvements (HSIP 12) 2037 $ 2,246,922 Zone 7 Pavement Management (Phase I) 2043 $ 322,452
Walk-Smart Crosswalk Improvements 2045 $ 113,130
Walk-Smart Crosswalk Improvements-Phase II 2060 $ 149,500 Delta De Anza Multimodal Trail Safety
Improvements
2052 $ 4,427,000
Countywide Smart Signal 2243 $ 1,179,890
Pittsburg Center Smart City Pilot 2314 $ 1,200,000
Underground
Infrastructure
Bella Vista/Riverview Water Consolidation TBD $ 1,534,320 Pittsburg Moves Active Transportation Plan
Update
2472 $ 408,000
Buchanan Road Slope Repair 3024 $ 1,323,436
Water Treatment Plant Alternative Fuel
Conversion
5074 $ 959,752
Park Buchanan Park Pond Loop Replacement 3040 $ 222,288 $ 18,842,738 $ 471,952 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Community
Facilities
FEDERAL/STATE GRANT
CIP Expenditures
Roadway
Infrastructure
29
Current and Projected Unfunded Project Needs:
30
This page was intentionally left blank.
32
33
34
This page was intentionally left blank.
36
Project Title: Project #:
BART Pedestrian & Bicycle Connectivity 2019
Description/Justification:
The Project encompasses the installation of a Class II buffered bicycle lane along Railroad Avenue from California Avenue to East 17th Street. This work will include slurry seal, and the installation of roadside signs and pavement striping and markings.
Additionally, a Class I path along the west side of Railroad Ave from State Route 4 (SR-4) to the Delta De Anza Regional Trail will be installed. Along the SR-4 East-bound on-ramp from the BART parking facility to Railroad Avenue, a Class I path will be installed along the north side of the adjacent properties within Caltrans right-of-way. These improvements will enhance safety and security within the BART vicinity. During the Bid Opening phase additional improvements such as “Alternate A” – The street and trail lighting along California Avenue and “Alternate D” – Railroad Avenue path lighting has been added to the project scope. Railroad Avenue’s beautification of the greenbelt is also included in this project. The greenbelt project includes upgrades to the landscape and irrigation system along the Railroad Avenue segment from State Route 4 (SR-4) to the Delta De Anza Regional Trail.
Supplemental Information:
Caltrans has relinquished to the City of Pittsburg a portion of SR-4 consisting of Class I bikeways south of California Avenue between Railroad Avenue and Harbor Street.
Federal/State Funding Sources: One Bay Area Grant 2 (OBAG2); Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Trail Facilities (PBTF Grant); Safe Routes to Bart (SR2B); Transportation Development Act (TDA Grant); and East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority (ECCRFFA).
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Railroad Ave, California Ave, and Bliss
Ave
Project Manager: K. Labao
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
37
Project Title: Project #:
Harbor St. Safety Improvements (HSIP 12) 2037
Description/Justification:
Improve signal hardware (Cabinets, signal heads, backplates, controllers, backup battery systems, and modems) at intersections, lighting roadway segment improvements, and upgrade pedestrian crossings with enhanced safety features.
Supplemental Information:
On February 28, 2025, Caltrans awarded the City an HSIP 12 Cycle Grant in the amount of $2,246,922.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 10,200 $ 19,800 $ 22,500 $ 52,500
2122 Design $ 60,000 $ 125,000 $ 185,000
2281 Construction $ 1,440,000 $ 882,700 $ 2,322,700
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 10,200 $ 19,800 $ 22,500 $ 52,500 TOTAL $ 80,400 $ 1,604,600 $ 927,700 $ 2,612,700
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL Federal/State Funding $ 2,246,922 $ 2,246,922
201 HUTA $ 365,778 $ 365,778
TOTAL $ 2,612,700 $ 2,612,700
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Harbor Street from Buchanan Road to
East 3rd Street
Project Manager: K.Labao
Project Priority: 1C – Essential
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2027/28
38
Project Title: Project #:
Bailey Road Improvements Phase I 2041
Description/Justification:
This project will widen Bailey Road from West Leland Road the southern city limits from 2-lanes to 4-lanes. The project will accommodate Class II bicycle lanes, sidewalks along Bailey Estates frontage, and a raised center median.
Supplemental Information:
Funding will be provided by the ECCRFFA funds for 97% of total project costs. Remaining funds will come from Development fees.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 10,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 250,000 $ 216,600 $ 776,600 2122 Design $ 100,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,600,000 2281 Construction $ 1,930,000 $ 9,000,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 17,930,000 2372 Administrative Overhead $ 10,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 250,000 $ 216,600 $ 776,600 TOTAL $ 120,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 3,230,000 $ 9,500,000 $ 7,433,200 $ 22,083,200 PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL ECCRFFA $ 5,000,000 $ 16,440,000 $ 21,440,000
303 LTMF $ 150,000 $ 493,200 $ 643,200
TOTAL $ 5,150,000 $ 16,933,200 $ 22,083,200
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Bailey Road from W. Leland Road to
southern city limits
Project Manager: S. Saklaen
Project Priority: 2F – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2029/30
39
Project Title: Project #:
Annual Citywide Traffic Calming 2042
Description/Justification:
This project will provide funding to improve and maintain the current infrastructure to enhance safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. Traffic calming measures include, but are not limited to, the installation of bulb-out, round-about, hawk signs, speed humps, and other improvements throughout the city. Locations are to be determined by the Public Works and Engineering Departments.
Supplemental Information:
This is an ongoing project.
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Citywide
Project Manager: M. Ruiz
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
40
City of Pittsburg 2026/27 – 2030/31 Capital Improvement Program Project Title: Project #:
Zone 7 Pavement Management (Phase I) 2043
Description/Justification:
The City of Pittsburg has divided its pavement management plan into 10 zones. The project will use a variety of pavement management techniques such as pavement overlay, reconstruction, micro-surfacing, cape seal, patch paving, base failure repairs, and crack sealing.
Supplemental Information:
Zone 7 will be broken in two Phases. Phase 1 is expected to take place in Summer 2026 and Phase 2 in Summer 2027.
The CalRecycle Grant was awarded to the City for the Zone 7 Pavement Management Project.
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Maintenance Zone 7
Project Manager: S. Reese
Project Priority: 1A - Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
41
Project Title: Project #:
Walk-Smart Crosswalk Improvements 2045
Description/Justification:
This project is located at the intersections of West 10th Street and West Street, Santa Teresa Drive and Lacoma Drive, Black Diamond Street and West 9
th Street, San Juan and Calistoga Drive, and San Juan and Mariposa Drive crossings. This project will install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) near school crossings in Pittsburg. The crosswalks are all uncontrolled at this time, and the RRFBs will improve the safety of pedestrians using the trail.
Supplemental Information:
Funding Source: TDA FY 2025/2026 Article 3 Grant
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Est. Completion Date:
Roadway Infrastructure
West 10th Street, Santa Teresa Drive,
Black Diamond Street, and San Juan
Drive crossings
K.Labao
1C – Essential
Design
2026/27
42
Project Title: Project #:
Bailey Road Pavement Maintenance 2049
Description/Justification:
Bailey Road is a major arterial in need of pavement rehabilitation. The City has secured funding through two agreements: one with Keller Canyon Landfill for street maintenance on Bailey Road, and another with Contra Costa County which ensures 100% reimbursement on maintenance and repair costs for the County's portion of the roadway. This project will utilize both funding sources to complete the necessary pavement rehabilitation on Bailey Road.
Supplemental Information:
On 04/08/13 Fund 312 was established with the adoption of City Council Reso No. 13-11953. That resolution authorized the execution of the Bailey Road Maintenance Surcharge Disbursement Agreement with Contra Costa County. In short, the use permit for the Keller Canyon Landfill requires the landfill operator to impose a surcharge to their customers for the maintenance of Bailey Rd. between the HWY 4 interchange and the entrance to the landfill. Per the agreement, the City receives 32% of the surcharge revenue collected each fiscal year, which would be expended on projects to maintain the stretch of Bailey Rd.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 40,000
2281 Construction $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 40,000 TOTAL $ 40,000 $ 2,040,000 $ 2,080,000
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 312 Bailey Rd Maintenance $ 2,080,000 $ 2,080,000
TOTAL $ 2,080,000 $ 2,080,000
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Est. Completion Date:
Roadway Infrastructure
Bailey Road
S. Reese
1C - Essential
Design
2026/27
43
Project Title: Project #:
Delta De Anza Multimodal Trail Safety Improvements 2052 Description/Justification:
The project proposes a series of critical safety and operational enhancements to the Delta De Anza Trail (Class I). These improvements include wayfinding signage, protected green bike lanes, rectangular rapid flashing beacons, raised/high visibility crosswalks, bulb-outs, pedestrian lighting, and upgrades to the trail’s existing pavement.
Improvements to the Delta De Anza Trail will help create a well-connected and attractive transportation network that will increase travel by walking or bicycling. The trail is parallel to several important commute routes and serves as an alternative to automobile travel for commutes to work, school, and recreational activities.
Supplemental Information:
All right-of-way required for the project is currently owned and/or operated by the following parties: Contra Costa County, City of Pittsburg, EBMUD, and EBRPD. This project will be scaled to remain within the project budget. Contra Costa County will cover the match requirement for improvements in their jurisdiction.
Funding sources include: One Bay Area Grant (OBAG 3) for Federal funding, and Other funding is from the East Bay Regional Park District.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 6,593 $ 30,000 $ 25,000 $ 14,000 $ 75,593 2122 Design $ 4,896 $ 155,970 $ 344,000 $ 504,866
2281 Construction $ 2,500,000 $ 1,855,759 $ 4,355,759
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 4,188 $ 30,000 $ 25,000 $ 14,000 $ 73,188 TOTAL $ 4,896 $ 215,970 $ 2,894,000 $ 1,883,759 $ 5,009,406 PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL Federal/State Funding $ 4,427,000 $ 4,427,000
Other $ 582,406 $ 582,406
TOTAL $ 5,009,406 $ 5,009,406
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Delta De Anza Trail from Pittsburg to
Bay Point
Project Manager: S. Saklaen
Project Priority: 2G – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2027/28
44
Project Title: Project #:
Walk-Smart Crosswalk Improvements Phase II 2060
Description/Justification:
This project is located at the intersections of West 10th Street/York Street, Power Avenue/Jorgensen Drive, Buchanan Road/Santa Ana Drive, Burton Avenue/Crowley Street, Alturas Avenue/Riverview Drive and Balclutha Way/East Trident Drive . This project will install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) near school crossings in Pittsburg. The crosswalks are all uncontrolled at this time, and the RRFBs will improve the safety of pedestrians using the trail.
Supplemental Information:
Funding Source: TDA FY 2026/2027 Article 3 Grant
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: West 10th Street, Santa Teresa Drive,
Black Diamond Street, and San Juan
Drive crossings
Project Manager: M. Ruiz
Project Priority: 1E – Essential
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
45
Project Title: Project #:
Citywide Arterial Median Conversion 2228
Description/Justification:
This project will focus on median conversions on arterial streets. The locations and priorities are determined by staff to ensure adequate work areas are provided for maintenance staff working within the medians. The project scope includes adding longer necks to medians, converting grass medians to landscaping that requires less water, and converting some medians to red stamped concrete. Some potential locations for this project are Central Harbor median/Roundabout, 3rd Street Median Stamped Concrete fill and grass removal/replanting, then median enhancement on RR from Highway 4 to south to Burger King. These locations are the most important, but other locations throughout the project may be later identified based on bid prices and project funding.
Supplemental Information:
This project will impact O&M and require coordination with maintenance staff.
Project Category: Streets
Location: Central Harbor/3rd Street/Railroad
Avenue half
Project Manager: H. Mata
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
46
Project Title: Project #:
Annual Citywide Striping and Signage 2242
Description/Justification:
This project will provide funding to complete new installations or provide upgrades to signing and striping improvements or removal and replacement of existing signing and striping at locations citywide. Priority for locations will be determined by the Public Works and Engineering Departments.
Supplemental Information:
None
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 15,649 $ 3,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 43,649 2281 Construction $ 131,818 $ 55,674 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 462,492 2372 Administrative Overhead $ 13,028 $ 3,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 41,028 TOTAL $ 160,494 $ 61,674 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 547,168 PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 201 HUTA $ 247,168 50,000$ $ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 547,168 TOTAL $ 247,168 50,000$ $ 50,000 50,000$ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 547,168
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Citywide
Project Manager: M. Ruiz
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
47
Project Title: Project #:
Countywide Smart Signals 2243
Description/Justification:
This project is expected to result in innovative upgrades to traffic signals and intersections on the regional routes of significance within the City of Pittsburg. Many of the City’s existing traffic signals lack communication technology, which makes traffic signal synchronization and coordination between signals along local roads challenging. Thirty (30) signals have been identified to be part of the project. The Smart Signals will enable the City of Pittsburg’s signals to be upgraded to a smart signal system that will enable the implementation of improvements such as signal interconnect and synchronization to optimize traffic flow and reduce congestion; prioritize transit & emergency vehicles; use video detection and analytics to proactively identify ‘near miss” situations and report those back to traffic management center.
Supplemental Information:
CCTA is the recipient of Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC’s) One Bay Area Cycle 3 funds for the design, construction, and deployment of the project.
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Est. Completion
Date:
Roadway Infrastructure
Approx. 30 intersections total –
Buchanan, W. Leland Rd & Railroad Ave
M. Ruiz
2G – Required
Design
2026/27
48
Project Title: Project #:
Citywide Sidewalk Repair 2244
Description/Justification:
This project will repair damaged sidewalks at multiple locations throughout the City. Priority of locations will be determined by the Public Works and Engineering Departments.
Supplemental Information:
None
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 20,000
2281 Construction $ 330,800 $ 330,800
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 20,000
TOTAL $ 10,000 $ 360,800 $ 370,800
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL Measure M Surplus $ 270,800 100,000$ $ 370,800
TOTAL $ 270,800 $ 100,000 $ 370,800
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Citywide
Project Manager: S. Reese
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Preliminary
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
49
Project Title: Project #:
Pittsburg Center Smart City Pilot 2314
Description/Justification:
This project consists of implementing smart city technologies ¼ mile transportation grid surrounding the Pittsburg Center BART station with connected technologies such as adaptive streetlights, connected traffic signals, and digital and static wayfinding signage. These upgrades will help encourage transit use, encourage walking and bicycling by creating safer and more complete streets, alleviate traffic, and attract local businesses.
Supplemental Information:
Federal/State Funding – Community Project Funding /Congressionally Directed Spending (CPFCDS – Earmark) Cycle 1 (2022).
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Est. Completion Date:
Roadway Infrastructure
¼ Mile radius surrounding the
Pittsburg Center Bart Station
M. Ruiz
2G – Required
Design
2026/27
50
Project Title: Project #:
West Leland Road Extension Phase II 3038
Description/Justification:
This project will extend West Leland Road from Santa Teresa Drive to Avila Road. The new road will be 4 lanes with a raised median and sidewalks. The project will accommodate bicycle facilities where appropriate.
Supplemental Information:
Funding will be provided by the ECCRFFA funds.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 75,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 30,000 $ 1,355,000 2122 Design $ 330,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,330,000
2281 Construction $ 27,500,000 $ 1,840,000 $ 29,340,000 2372 Administrative Overhead $ 75,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 30,000 $ 1,355,000 TOTAL $ 480,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 29,700,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 33,380,000 PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL ECCRFFA $ 33,380,000 $ 33,380,000
TOTAL $ 33,380,000 $ 33,380,000
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: W. Leland Rd from Santa Teresa Drive
to Avila Road
Project Manager: S. Reese
Project Priority: 1E – Essential
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2028/29
51
Project Title: Project #:
Pittsburg-Antioch Highway Widening 3039
Description/Justification:
This project will consist of widening the Pittsburg-Antioch Highway from Loveridge Road to eastern City limits at Arcy Lane from 2-lanes to 4-lanes. The project will accommodate Class II bicycle lanes where appropriate, sidewalks, and a raised landscaped median with a center storage lane for left turns in front of businesses (2WLTL) where appliable.
Supplemental Information:
Funding will be provided by the ECCRFFA funds.
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Pittsburg- Antioch Highway from
Loveridge Road to the eastern City
limits
Project Manager: M. Mena
Project Priority: 2F – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2029/30
52
Project Title: Project #:
Annual Citywide Fence/Soundwall Repairs 3332
Description/Justification:
This project will be determined based on Staff input. The project will maintain ongoing city-owned fences and soundwalls repairs and replacements.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Citywide
Project Manager: H. Mata
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
53
Project Title: Project #:
Linscheid Drive Traffic Calming 4079
Description/Justification:
The project encompasses three intersections near Linscheid Drive with the primary goal of improving pedestrian safety and preventing vehicular speeding. The project was split up into two phases. The first phase constructed a traffic circle at the intersection of Linscheid Drive and Madoline Street. The scope included the installation of a roundabout, striping, and signage. The second phase of this project is expected to be completed by the end of FY 2026 , will take place at the intersections of Linscheid Drive and Ramona Street, and Manville Avenue and Madoline Street.
Improvements include, but are not limited to, the installation of roundabouts, medians, striping and pavement markings.
Supplemental Information:
Measure J funds from project 2019 - BART Pedestrian & Bicycle Connectivity were allocated to this project to complete the construction phase of Phase I (one roundabout at Linscheid/Madoline Street).
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 1,326 $ 27,000 $ 16,000 $ 44,326
2122 Design $ 184,404 $ 184,404
2281 Construction $ 167,506 $ 350,833 $ 518,339
2372 Administrative Overhead
TOTAL $ 185,730 $ 194,506 $ 366,833 $ 747,069
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 233 CDBG 202,184$ 78,052$ $ 366,833 $ 647,069
204 Measure J 100,000$ $ 100,000
Unfunded
TOTAL $ 202,184 $ 178,052 $ 366,833 $ 747,069
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Intersection of Linscheid Dr and
Madoline St
Project Manager: T. Tan
Project Priority: 1A - Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
54
Project Title: Project #:
Pavement Management Program TBD
Description/Justification:
The City of Pittsburg has divided its pavement management plan into 10 zones. The project will use a variety of pavement management techniques such as pavement overlay, reconstruction, micro-surfacing, cape seal, patch paving, base failure repairs, and crack sealing.
Supplemental Information:
Zone 6 will be implemented in Summer 2028, Zone 5 will be implemented in summer 2029, and Zone 8 will be implemented in Summer 2030. Zone 9 will be broken in two Phases. Phase 1 is expected to be completed in Summer 2031 and Phase 2 in Summer 2032.
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Maintenance Zone 6, 5, 8 and 9
Project Manager: S. Reese
Project Priority: 1E - Essential
Project Status: Preliminary
Est. Completion Date: 2031/32
55
Project Title: Project #:
2026/27 CDBG ADA Curb Ramp Installation Project TBD
Description/Justification:
This project consists of the construction of curb ramp(s) required in conjunction with the Linscheid Drive Traffic Calming Project.
Supplemental Information:
Funding Source: HUD CDBG Grant. Project will be combined and bid with Project 4079-Linscheid Drive Traffic Calming Project.
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Linscheid Drive
Project Manager: T. Tan
Project Priority: 1C – Essential
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
56
City of Pittsburg 2026/27 – 2030/31 Capital Improvement Program Project Title: Project #:
Zone 7 Pavement Management (Phase II) TBD
Description/Justification:
The City of Pittsburg has divided its pavement management plan into 10 zones. The project will use a variety of pavement management techniques such as pavement overlay, reconstruction, micro-surfacing, cape seal, patch paving, base failure repairs, and crack sealing.
Supplemental Information:
Zone 7 will be broken in two Phases. Phase 1 is expected to take place in Summer 2026 and Phase 2 in Summer 2027.
Project Category: Roadway Infrastructure
Location: Maintenance Zone 7
Project Manager: S. Reese
Project Priority: 1E - Essential
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2027/28
57
Project Title: Project #:
City Gateway Beautification TBD
Description/Justification:
This project is designed to enhance the visual appeal, and identity of key entrance corridors into the City. The project will create welcoming, well-maintained gateways that reflect community character, promote civic pride and improve first impressions for residents, businesses and visitors.
Corridors could include State Route 4 at Western City Limits, Bailey Road at Willow Avenue, State Route 4 at Bailey Road, Willow Pass Road at west City limits, eastbound Railroad Avenue offramp, Kirker Pass Road at south City limits, WB Railroad/Harbor Off-Ramp, Loveridge at State Route 4, East Leland at LMC, and Century Blvd at West Side.
Supplemental Information:
None
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 62,500 2122 Design $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 75,000 2281 Construction $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000 2372 Administrative Overhead $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 $ 62,500 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 111 Measure M $ 100,000 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ $ 500,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Est. Completion Date:
Roadway Infrastructure
Key Gateway Locations
G. Haynes
1E – Essential
New
Continuous
58
Project Title: Project #:
Loveridge Road Complete Streets TBD
Description/Justification:
This is for the design and construction of a Complete Streets corridor along Loveridge Road from the Pittsburg–Antioch Highway to the Northern Terminus. The improvements are designed to revitalize the existing roadway segment through comprehensive pavement rehabilitation including bicycle lanes, new landscape medians, installation of sidewalks, underground utility enhancements, and streetlighting. These elements aim to improve mobility, safety, and the overall streetscape for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists.
Supplemental Information:
City Staff are actively pursuing grant opportunities to fund the project.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 1,570,000 $ 1,570,000
2122 Design $ 2,210,000 $ 2,210,000
2281 Construction $ 20,900,000 $ 20,900,000
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 1,570,000 $ 1,570,000
TOTAL $ 26,250,000 $ 26,250,000
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2024/25 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL Unfunded $ 26,250,000 $ 26,250,000
TOTAL $ 26,250,000
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Roadway Infrastructure
Loveridge Rd from PA Hwy to N.
Terminus
M. Mena
2G - Required
New
Est. Completion Date: 2030/31
$ 26,250,000
59
Project Title: Project #:
West Leland Landscape Medians TBD
Description/Justification:
The project will design and construct new landscape medians along West Leland Road, extending from Woodhill Drive to Dover Way. These improvements are designed to enhance traffic safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists by providing clearer separation of travel lanes and reducing opportunities for speeding and reckless driving. The medians will also feature landscape elements that improve the visual character of the corridor and provide a more attractive streetscape.
Supplemental Information:
City Staff are actively pursuing grant opportunities to fund the project.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 687,500 $ 687,500
2122 Design $ 65,000 $ 65,000
2281 Construction $ 5,210,000 $ 5,210,000
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 687,500 $ 687,500
TOTAL $ 6,650,000 $ 6,650,000
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2024/25 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL Unfunded $ 6,650,000 $ 6,650,000
TOTAL $ 6,650,000
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Roadway Infrastructure
West Leland Rd from Woodhill Dr to
Dover Way
M. Mena
2G - Required
New
Est. Completion Date: 2030/31
$ 6,650,000
60
Project Title: Project #:
California Ave Class I Bike Path TBD
Description/Justification:
This is for the construction of a Class-I pedestrian and bicycle multi-use path on California Avenue from Harbor Street to Loveridge Road. The proposed improvements will include, but are not limited to, new paved pathway facilities, enhanced pedestrian and bicycle access features, lighting, storm drainage with water quality features, and associated safety enhancements. These improvements are intended to increase mobility for pedestrians and cyclists, improve connectivity within the corridor, and enhance overall roadway safety.
Supplemental Information:
City Staff are actively pursuing grant opportunities to fund the project.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 205,000 $ 205,000
2122 Design $ 400,000 $ 400,000
2281 Construction $ 2,730,000 $ 2,730,000
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 205,000 $ 205,000
TOTAL $ 3,540,000 $ 3,540,000
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2024/25 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL Unfunded $ 3,540,000 $ 3,540,000
TOTAL $ 3,540,000
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Roadway Infrastructure
California Ave from Harbor St to
Loveridge Road
M. Mena
2G - Required
New
Est. Completion Date: 2030/31
$ 3,540,000
61
Project Title: Project #:
West Leland Road Bicycle & Pedestrian Overcrossing TBD
Description/Justification:
This project is for the design and construction of a dedicated pedestrian and bicycle bridge connecting the newly developed Dreamcourts facility at John Henry Johnson Park to Premier Fields. Spanning West Leland Road, the bridge will provide a safe, vehicle-free crossing for pedestrians and cyclists while significantly enhancing connectivity between the two recreational destinations. By improving accessibility and promoting active transportation, the project will create a more cohesive, userfriendly environment for community members and users of all ages.
Supplemental Information:
City Staff are actively pursuing grant opportunities to fund the project.
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Roadway Infrastructure
Loveridge Rd from PA Hwy to N.
Terminus
M. Mena
2G - Required
New
Est. Completion Date: 2030/31
$ 10,000,000
62
Project Title: Project #:
Delta De Anza Multimodal Trail Safety Improvements-Phase II TBD Description/Justification:
This project will enhance the Delta de Anza Trail segment within the Pittsburg city limits through the installation of new pedestrian-scale lighting and comprehensive landscaping improvements along the entire Pittsburg corridor. The project aims to improve safety, accessibility, and overall user experience for pedestrians, cyclists, and other trail users by providing continuous illumination and aesthetically pleasing green space. Work will include installation of energy-efficient lighting fixtures, planting of drought-tolerant vegetation, irrigation system upgrades, soil preparation, and ongoing erosion control measures where needed.
This project supports the City’s goals of promoting active transportation, enhancing public safety, and creating attractive, sustainable recreational spaces. It also aligns with regional efforts to improve multi-use trail networks and encourage outdoor activity.
Supplemental Information:
City staff are actively pursuing grant opportunities to fund the project.
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Est. Completion Date:
Roadway Infrastructure
Delta De Anza Trail from Pittsburg to
Bay Point
G Haynes
2G – Required
Design
2027/28
$ 8,700,000
63
This page was intentionally left blank.
64
This page was intentionally left blank.
66
Project Title: Project #:
West Santa Fe Avenue Sewer Water Rehabilitation (Phase I) 5003 Description/Justification:
This project will replace approximately 8,500 linear feet of water main pipe and approximately 8,000 linear feet of sewer main pipe. This project targets areas where the water and sewer systems have reached the end of their useful life and have become maintenance problems and/or do not produce adequate flow.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: From Montezuma St. to Black
Diamond St. between W 10
th St. & W.
Santa Fe Ave, and E. 12th St.
Project Manager: S. Saklaen
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2028/29
67
Project Title: Project #:
Water System Reliability (Cabrillo Place Waterline) 5006 Description/Justification:
This project will improve system reliability for Zone 2 and Zone 3 customers by looping systems (Buchanan Pump Station & Brookside Drive) or based on an urgent need/chronic problem identified by Public Works.
Supplemental Information:
The Cabrillo Place Waterline project, Phase 1B of the Water System Reliability Project, is the final stage of this initiative. The project involves several critical components aimed at enhancing the water infrastructure in the area.
This includes the installation of a new water main, fire hydrants, and services along Alta Vista Circle. In addition, this project will include the abandonment of the plagued water main running between residential homes in the Top of the Woodlands and Woodland Hills Unit 3 Subdivisions. This final phase is crucial for ensuring a reliable and efficient water system, addressing both current needs and future demands of the community.
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: Crestview Ave to Stoneman Reservoir
Project Manager: S. Saklaen
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
68
Project Title: Project #:
Water Treatment Plant Capital Repairs and Improvements 5065 Description/Justification:
The project will provide upgrades and repairs at the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and other water distribution facilities as identified by the WTP staff annually.
Supplemental Information:
None
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 1,967 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 13,967 2281 Construction $ 18,852 $ 152,516 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 421,368 2372 Administrative Overhead $ 2,665 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 14,665 TOTAL $ 23,484 $ 156,516 $ 54,000 $ 54,000 $ 54,000 $ 54,000 $ 54,000 $ 450,000 PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 501 Water Operations Fund $ 300,000 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 450,000$ TOTAL $ 300,000 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 450,000$
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: Water Treatment Plant
Project Manager: J. Moser
Project Priority: 2H - Required
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
69
Project Title: Project #:
Water Treatment Plant Filtration Improvements & Hypochlorite Conversion 5067 Description/Justification:
The City of Pittsburg’s Water Treatment Plant (WTP) was originally constructed in the 1950’s. Upgrades to the facilities were conducted in the 1970s with major upgrades in the 1980’s. Over the last five years, staff, with consultant assistance, determined that the WTP filtration system had deteriorated significantly and that reconstruction in place was neither cost effective nor prudent. Thus, the City of Pittsburg concluded, with expert consultant assistance, to provide further upgrades to the aging WTP infrastructure.
The Project will improve the water quality and continue to meet the demands of the City of Pittsburg’s residential, commercial, or industrial customers. It includes installation of six new water filters, conversion of an existing gaseous chlorine system to liquid hypochlorite (bleach) and upgrades to filter effluent pumping and buried WTP infrastructure.
Supplemental Information:
Water revenue bonds were sold in 2022 of a not to exceed funding allocation of $50,000,000 to finance improvements covered by this project.
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: Water Treatment Plant
Project Manager: G. Haynes
Project Priority: 1A – Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion Date: 2027/28
70
Project Title: Project #:
Bella Vista / Riverview Water Consolidation Project 5090 Description/Justification:
The Bella Vista and Riverview Mobile Home parks located on Willow Pass Road will be abandoning their existing well system and construct improvements to connect to the City’s potable water system.
Supplemental Information:
The State Water Resources Control Board through its Safe and Affordable Fund for Equity and Resilience (“SAFER”) program will finance the design and construction of the Water Consolidation Project. The City of Pittsburg will manage the procurement of the contractor and oversee the construction of the project as required by the SAFER program.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 10,000 $ 60,000 $ 70,000
2122 Design $ 50,000 $ 177,391 $ 227,391
2281 Construction $ 7,500 $ 1,211,929 $ 1,219,429
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 2,500 $ 15,000 $ 17,500
TOTAL $ 70,000 $ 1,464,320 $ 1,534,320
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL Federal/State Funding $ 1,534,320 $ 1,534,320
TOTAL $ 1,534,320
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: Willow Pass Road
Project Manager: M. Mena
Project Priority: 2G - Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
71
Project Title: Project #:
Americana Park Basin Retrofit TBD
Description/Justification:
To alleviate chronic flooding on North Parkside Drive, the retention pond located in Americana Park will include improvements to provide additional storage capacity for stormwater flows, and installation of a rate controlled outlet structure to provide stormwater treatment. In addition the drainage channel adjacent to the roadway will be retrofitted with soil and vegetation that will improve the quality of stormwater runoff discharged from the retention pond.
Supplemental Information:
The City is waiting for EPA funding.
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: N. Parkside Drive
Project Manager: G. Haynes
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Preliminary
Est. Completion Date: 2029/30
$
72
Project Title: Project #:
Loveridge Road Sanitary Sewer Pipe Re-line 5120
Description/Justification:
The Project includes the rehabilitation of approximately 640 linear feet of existing 15” and 18” sewer collection main. The work will include relining these existing segments of pipe with a cured in place liner. This repair is needed to provide longevity to an existing sewerage system to accommodate existing and future development in the area.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: Loveridge Road, north of Leland Road
Project Manager: G. Haynes
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Preliminary
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
73
Project Title: Project #:
California Season Sewer Lift Station Repair TBD
Description/Justification:
The California Seasons sewer lift station is exhibiting severe corrosion and requires a comprehensive structural assessment, including an evaluation of the force main. The existing telematics system is obsolete and no longer supported. Currently, crews clean the wet well on a quarterly basis, while electricians perform weekly inspections of the pumps and electronic components.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: California Seasons
Project Manager: H. Mata
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2028/29
74
Project Title: Project #:
Terry Court Sewer Repair 5130
Description/Justification:
This project will abandon existing sewer main pipe which runs through property line between 960 and 966 Terry Court and reconstruct new sanitary sewer main at Terry Court to connect at Saint Moritz Drive. The existing sewer main collapsed and requires frequent maintenance. Relocating sewer main to the street side will ensure adequate slope and flow to reduce ongoing maintenance issues.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: Terry Ct and St. Mortiz Dr.
Project Manager: S. Saklaen
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
75
Project Title: Project #:
Central Addition Water and Sewer Rehabilitation (Phase I) TBD Description/Justification:
This project will replace sewer main lines within the Central Addition neighborhood. Many of these main lines run through the backyards of the houses making them a maintenance issue.
Supplemental Information:
None
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 40,000 $ 100,000 $ 140,000
2122 Design $ 600,000 $ 600,000
2281 Construction $ 5,820,000 $ 5,820,000
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 40,000 $ 100,000 $ 140,000 TOTAL $ 680,000 $ 6,020,000 $ 6,700,000
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL Unfunded $ 680,000 $ 6,020,000 $ 6,700,000
TOTAL $ 680,000 $ 6,020,000 $ 6,700,000
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category:
Location:
Project Manager:
Project Priority:
Project Status:
Est. Completion Date:
Underground Infrastructure
Central Addition Neighborhood
S. Saklaen
2H – Required
Preliminary
2029/30
76
Project Title: Project #:
West Santa Fe Avenue Sewer Water Rehabilitation (Phase II) TBD Description/Justification:
This project will replace approximately 4,500 linear feet of water main pipe and approximately 4,000 linear feet of sewer main pipe. This project targets areas where the water and sewer systems have reached the end of their useful life and have become maintenance problems and/or do not produce adequate flow.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Underground Infrastructure
Location: From Montezuma St. to Beacon St.
between W 10th St. & W. Santa Fe
Ave, and E. 4th St. & E. 5th St.
Project Manager: S. Saklaen
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Preliminary
Est. Completion Date: 2029/30
77
Project Title: Project #:
Buchanan Park Storm Drain Improvements TBD
Description/Justification:
Approximately 560 linear feet of twin 18-inch storm drain pipelines have been identified as damaged and in need of replacement. Staff analysis further determined that additional storm drain capacity is necessary to adequately accommodate existing flows from the development located south (upstream) of the project area.
Supplemental Information:
Staff attempted to CCTV the pipeline; however, due to the extent of the damage, the pipe could not be inspected.
Based on these conditions, the project includes the removal and replacement of the twin 18-inch storm drain lines and adding capacity for current development.
Project Category: Drainage Improvement
Location: Buchanan Park
Project Manager: M. Mena
Project Priority: 1A-Essential
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
78
This page was intentionally left blank.
80
Project Title: Project #:
City Gateway Monument 1755
Description/Justification:
This project includes construction of City entryway sign along Highway 4 near the western city limits. The sign will incorporate the new City branding effort and landscaping.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Community Facilities
Location: Highway 4 at Western City Limits
Project Manager: J. Samuelson
Project Priority: 1E – Essential
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
81
Project Title: Project #:
Pittsburg Moves Active Transportation Plan Update 2472
Description/Justification:
The Pittsburg Moves Active Transportation Plan (ATP) was last updated in December 2020. The Pittsburg Moves ATP is not a one-time document, but a living plan that is constantly evolving to reflect the needs of the community, environmental considerations, and state policies. Regular updates to the Pittsburg Moves ATP can help address gaps in the transportation network, particularly in underserved areas, ensuring that all residents, regardless of income or physical ability, have access to safe and convenient transportation options.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) states that a public entity must reasonably modify its policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination against people with disabilities. Updating the ADA Transition Plan will assist the City of Pittsburg, its City Council and staff in identifying policy, programmatic, and physical barriers to accessibility and in developing barrier removal solutions that will facilitate the opportunity of access to all individuals. This includes, but is not limited to, sidewalks, curb ramps, buildings and other city owned facilities.
Supplemental Information:
On November 15, 2024, USDOT awarded the City an Safe Streets for All (SS4A) 2024 Planning and Demonstration Grant in the amount of $408,000 to update the Pittsburg Moves ATP and ADA Transition Plans.
Project Category: Community Facilities
Location: Citywide
Project Manager: M. Mena
Project Priority: 1B – Essential
Project Status: Preliminary
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
82
City of Pittsburg 2026/27 – 2030/31 Capital Improvement Program Project Title: Project #:
Buchanan Road Slope Repair 3024
Description/Justification:
The Buchanan Road slope was damaged and significantly eroded during the unusual atmospheric river storm events of January 2023. The failure is within the City’s right-of-way, but it could threaten the stability of several houses above the slope.
The work to repair and re-establish the slope will include removal of unsuitable soil and rebuilding and strengthening the terraces with suitable imported material, geotechnical fabrics, and other methods as needed and to be specified during design.
Supplemental Information:
This project qualifies for the Emergency Relief Program managed by Caltrans. The City of Pittsburg was awarded funding under the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Maintenance program in March 2025.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 23,317 $ 55,000 $ 78,317
2122 Design $ 147,865 $ 147,865
2281 Construction $ 1,445,718 $ 1,445,718
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 6,536 $ 55,000 $ 61,536
TOTAL $ 177,718 $ 1,555,718 $ 1,733,436
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 110 General Funds Fund $ 410,000 $ 410,000
Federal/State Funding $ 1,323,436 $ 1,323,436
TOTAL $ 1,733,436 $ 1,733,436
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Community Facilities
Location: Buchanan Road at Quercus Lane
across from Buchanan Park
Project Manager: M. Mena
Project Priority: 1A – Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
83
Project Title: Project #:
Corporation Yard Groundwater Monitoring Wells 3118
Description/Justification:
The Corporation Yard fueling system previously contained two underground storage tanks. Elevated gasoline-related petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were identified in soil and groundwater. Although the tanks were removed, elevated concentrations remained, requiring additional environmental evaluation.
The scope of work includes installation of groundwater monitoring wells, exploratory soil borings, and air/soil-vapor samplings to evaluate subsurface conditions and potential vapor intrusion to nearby buildings. The investigation will define the extent of contamination, evaluate groundwater conditions and support regulatory compliance to attain case closure under the State Water Resources Control Board’s Low-Threat Underground Storage Tank Case Closure Policy.
Supplemental Information:
None
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 53,533 $ 3,000 $ 5,000 $ 61,533
2122 Design $ 297,354 $ 297,354
2281 Construction $ 1,203,977 $ 100,000 $ 196,344 $ 1,500,321 2372 Administrative Overhead $ 50,892 $ 3,000 $ 5,000 $ 58,892 TOTAL $ 1,605,756 $ 106,000 $ 206,344 $ 1,918,100
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 501 $ 759,100 $ 759,100
521 $ 759,000 $ 759,000
621 $ 400,000 $ 400,000
TOTAL $ 1,918,100 1,918,100 $
Water Operations Fund
Building Maintenance
CURRENT PROPOSED
Sewer Operations Fund
PROJECT FINANCING
Project Category: Community Facilities
Location: Corporation Yard
Project Manager: T. Tan
Project Priority: 1A – Essential
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion
Date:
2026/27
84
Project Title: Project #:
Highlands Ranch Tank Improvements 5007
Description/Justification:
Highlands Ranch Tank is a 1MG Steel On-Grade tank and has been operated and maintained by the City of Pittsburg since 1999. Based on a recent assessment made in October 2021, it is recommended that several improvements should be made to prevent further erosion/damage to the tank. The scope includes but is not limited to installing a new cathodic protection system, new interior coating system, and the installation of new 12-inch vents. JDH Corrosion Consultants conducted a coating condition assessment on August 25, 2022.
Supplemental Information:
It is recommended that exterior surface of the tank be reinspected and reevaluated for any needed remedial repairs in five (5) years and that the City cleans the tank every three (3) years in accordance with American Water Works Association M42.
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 5,600 $ 7,000 $ 8,000 $ 20,600
2122 Design $ 32,622 $ 50,000 $ 82,622
2281 Construction $ 581,500 $ 581,500
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 5,216 $ 7,000 $ 8,000 $ 20,216 TOTAL $ 43,438 $ 64,000 $ 597,500 $ 704,938
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 501 Water Operations Fund $ 705,000 $ 705,000
TOTAL $ 705,000 705,000 $
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Community Facilities
Location: Highlands Ranch at the end of
Ventura Drive
Project Manager: S. Saklaen
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
85
Project Title: Project #:
Water Treatment Plant Alternative Fuel Conversion 5074
Description/Justification:
This project includes the installation of an alternative power generation facility to power a portion of the City’s water treatment plant.
Supplemental Information:
The City of Pittsburg received $959,752 through a congressional earmark grant application submitted to Congressman Garamendi’s office. The grant is included in the House of Representatives Appropriation Bill# 4366 and was signed into law by President Biden on March 8, 2024.
Project Category: Community Facilities
Location: Water Treatment Plant
Project Manager: M. Mena
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Preliminary
Est. Completion Date: 2027/28
86
Project Title: Project #:
Buchanan Pump Station Electrical Repairs TBD
Description/Justification:
This project includes upgrading and replacing the aging electrical system at the Buchanan Pump Station to improve operational reliability, safety and regulatory compliance. The existing electrical infrastructure has reached the end of its useful life, with a risk of unplanned outages imminent.
Upon completion, the electrical upgrades will improve system reliability, enhance employee safety, reduce maintenance needs and the facility will meet future capacity and regulatory demands.
Supplemental Information:
None
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ 15,000
2122 Design $ 50,000 $ 50,000
2281 Construction $ 300,000 $ 300,000
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ 15,000
TOTAL $ 60,000 $ 320,000 $ 380,000
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 501 Water Operations Fund $ 380,000 $ 380,000
TOTAL $ 380,000 $ 380,000
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Community Facilities
Location: Buchanan Pump Station (Buchanan
Road)
Project Manager: G. Haynes
Project Priority: 2H - Required
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2027/28
87
This page was intentionally left blank.
88
This page was intentionally left blank.
90
Project Title: Project #:
Buchanan Park Pond Loop Replacement 3040
Description/Justification:
Buchanan Park is one of the most widely used parks in the City and features several recreational facilities. The existing path that loops around the pond has since deteriorated, with significant damage from tree roots and the nearby pond. The project will replace portions of the existing walkway around the pond, install slope protection, clear and grub, and remove the cattails in the pond.
Supplemental Information:
Funding sources: Per Capita Grant Program Funds
PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time $ 1,764 $ 1,600 $ 4,500 $ 7,864
2281 Construction $ 8,563 $ 199,761 $ 208,324
2372 Administrative Overhead $ 1,600 $ 4,500 $ 6,100
TOTAL $ 3,200 $ 208,761 $ 222,288
PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 TOTAL Federal/State Funded 222,288$ $ 222,288
TOTAL $ 222,288 $ 222,288
PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
Project Category: Parks
Location: Buchanan Park
Project Manager: S. Saklaen
Project Priority: 2G – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
91
Project Title: Project #:
Pittsburg Premier Fields – Phase II TBD
Description/Justification:
The second phase of the Project will construct two multipurpose fields with site furnishing, tree plantings, and other amenities within the project limits. This project will create a much-needed space for community members to participate in sporting events within their hometown.
Supplemental Information:
Funding for this project is from the sale of a portion of the old golf course.
Project Category: Parks
Location: Old Delta View Golf Course
Project Manager: M. Mena
Project Priority: 2F-Required
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2029/30
92
Project Title: Project #:
City Park Electrical Room Replacement TBD
Description/Justification:
The current service/electrical room that houses all the electrical equipment for City Park fields and services is in need of replacement due to age and condition. Currently the “Storage room” that houses the electrical panels and service wiring is susceptible to the elements. If the equipment were to fail, it would no longer allow for night games for the different sports leagues and community.
Supplemental Information: Design to include electrical code assessment of current service and appropriate new housing structure and storage room.
Project Category: Park Projects
Location: City Park – Field One
Project Manager: G. Haynes
Project Priority: 1C-Essential
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2027/28
93
Project Title: Project #:
Marina Outdoor Fitness Area TBD
Description/Justification:
This project includes the construction of an all-abilities outdoor fitness area. Access to health and wellness is a vital part of a thriving community. An outdoor fitness area ensures that all members of Pittsburg have access to overcome their obstacles in becoming healthier. The court includes 12 units that may serve up to 27 people at one time and includes accessible equipment and access.
Supplemental Information:
RaSi Holds Hands, a charitable organization committed to enriching and empowering young lives through selfless service and community support, has generously pledged $125,000 to advance this project.
Project Category: Parks
Location: Central Harbor Parking Lot
Project Manager: G. Haynes
Project Priority: 2G-Required
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
94
Project Title: Project #:
Soccer Field Turf Replacement TBD
Description/Justification:
This project consists of the removal and replacement of the existing synthetic turf system at City Park and Central Park. The current turf surfaces at these locations have reached the end of their useful life due to age, wear, and environmental exposure, resulting in diminished playability, safety concerns, and increased maintenance requirements.
Supplemental Information:
Project Category: Parks
Location: City Park
Project Manager: G. Haynes
Project Priority: 1C – Essential
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2036/37
95
This page was intentionally left blank.
96
This page was intentionally left blank.
98
Project Title: Project #:
Sheds A – D Upgrades 5517
Description/Justification:
This project is to repair the existing galvanized rain gutters that have corroded.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Marina
Location: Main Harbor
Project Manager: S. Saklaen
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
99
This page was intentionally left blank.
100
This page was intentionally left blank.
102
Project Title: Project #:
Duct Bank and Vault Replacements 5816
Description/Justification:
Specific sections of the island energy system have been identified for duct bank and vault replacement as being critical for “North End,” which includes existing ALCO and EPS customers, and the anticipated City of Vallejo master development north of G Street.
Supplemental Information:
Adopted Budget FY18/19 RES18-13499 $400,000 IE
Project Category: Power
Location: Mare Island
Project Manager: V. Xie
Project Priority: 2H-Required
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
103
Project Title: Project #:
Waterfront Area Reliability 5820
Description/Justification:
The Waterfront Area Reliability Project (“WARP”) will upgrade up to eight (8) utility electrical substations serving the Mare Island waterfront area. The waterfront hosts Pittsburg Power Company (PPC) Utility’s single largest commercial electrical customer, “Mare Island Dry Docks” (MIDD).
The waterfront area is prone to Utility equipment failures (“outages”) often during critical periods of operation. Existing utility facilities include underground lead cable, transformers and breaker sets that are over 40 years old. The dry docks serve demanding US Navy ship repair contracts and exceptionally high electrical loads. Electrical reliability is key to the viability of the MIDD business, which primarily serves the US Navy.
Supplemental Information:
Phase 1 Project scope includes engineering assessments, work scoping, cost estimating and the procurement of critical reliability equipment plus performing intermediate fixes/repairs. Phase 2 Project scope addresses procurement and replacement of and adding redundant underground primary voltage circuits along with breakers and transformer equipment.
Project Category: Power
Location: Berth 12-18 Mare Island
Project Manager: V. Xie
Project Priority: 2H-Required
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
104
Project Title: Project #:
Outage Recovery 5821
Description/Justification:
This project is used to provide ready capital resources to immediately respond to Pittsburg Power Company (PPC) Utility electrical and natural gas outages in the interest of the timely restoration of Customer services and the assurance of Public Safety. The project scope includes procurement of “Emergency” 3rd party resources, heavy equipment rental, general material procurement and the procurement of repair or replacement facility equipment. Each Outage is unique, and demands will vary. The CIP ‘Estimated Project Cost’ assumes three (3) outages at an average expense of $25,000 each – generally seen as the historical average.
Supplemental Information:
“Outages” are characterized as the unpredicted failure of utility equipment, including but not limited to, underground electrical cable faults, breaker failures, transformer failures, gas main line and regulator breaches and other related utility equipment. Outages can affect small groups of customers, or all the Mare Island service territory. The funds cover all costs above, plus Island Energy labor and 3rd party emergency response.
Project Category: Power
Location: Mare Island PPC Utility Service
Territory
Project Manager: V. Xie
Project Priority: 1C – Essential
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
105
Project Title: Project #:
RA Replacement 5826
Description/Justification:
Currently most electrical relays on Mare Island are rocker-arm relays, which need to be open manually. Modern relays open and close the circuits by receiving electrical signals from outside sources and can be operated from remote. The capital plan is to replace up to ten (10) RA assemblies with new PME devices at key stations, after the SKM modeling and analysis on the existing electrical system is complete.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Power
Location: PPC Electrical Distribution System on
Mare Island
Project Manager: V. Xie
Project Priority: 2H — Required
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
106
Project Title: Project #:
Electrical Substation Battery Replacement 5827
Description/Justification:
The existing substation batteries used at Island Energy’s electrical stations are outdated and inefficient. Island Energy are replacing the existing station battery systems in phases to secure power source for electrical system control and monitoring.
Island Energy will perform the battery replacement in-house as part of the Preventive. The fund will be used mostly for the purchase of new station batteries, battery racks and Substation battery chargers.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Power
Location: PPC Electrical Distribution System on
Mare Island
Project Manager: V. Xie
Project Priority: 2H — Required
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
107
Project Title: Project #:
Residential Gas Isolation Valves Installation 5828
Description/Justification:
To excavate existing gas pipeline to install a number of isolation valves throughout residential area on Mare Island. The installation of isolation valves is to allow safe and localized isolation in the event of a gas leak. Due to the locations of the proposed valve installations, contractors will need to be hired to replace ADA compliant sidewalk ramps where needed. The budget includes engineering, parts & materials and subcontracted concrete work.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Power
Location: Mare Island Residential 6 A, B & C
Project Manager: V. Xie
Project Priority: 1C – Essential
Project Status: Ongoing
Est. Completion Date: Continuous
108
Project Title: Project #:
Electrical System “SKM Modeling” And Analysis 5829
Description/Justification:
Gather data from electrical equipment on Mare Island to create detailed models of the electrical power systems using the SKM Power*Tools software, which is widely used by engineers to analyze electrical networks by performing calculations like load flow, fault analysis, arc flash hazard assessment, motor starting, and more. The models simulate the behavior of a power system using SKM software to identify potential issues and optimize design elements, which are needed for Island Energy to design new electrical system and troubleshooting the existing electrical system.
Supplemental Information:
None
Project Category: Power
Location: Mare Island PPC Electrical
Distribution System
Project Manager: V. Xie
Project Priority: 2H – Required
Project Status: Design
Est. Completion Date: 2026/27
109
Project Title: Project #:
Island Energy Electrical Substations Protection Reinforcement TBD Description/Justification:
A comprehensive, multi-layered strategy and action plan to protect critical electrical infrastructures on Mare Island from physical intrusion, vandalism, and sabotage. It integrates perimeter fencing, 24/7 surveillance (CCTV/IR), intrusion detection systems (IDS), access control, robust lighting, reinforcement and repairs of existing protective and security systems.
Supplemental Information:
Island Energy Enterprise fund 580 will fund the project.
Project Category: Power
Location: Mare Island, Vallejo
Project Manager: V.Xie
Project Priority: 1C - Safety
Project Status: New
Est. Completion Date: 2027/28
110
This page was intentionally left blank.
112
The future improvements section includes any potential improvements that are planned, but currently unfunded.
Roadway Infrastructure
Corporation Yard Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: 357 E. 12th Street
Description/Justification:
The project will analyze the existing condition of the pavement at the Corp Yard and determine pavement areas that require patch paving, base failure repairs, pavement reconstruction and slurry seal to help extend the useful life of the Corporation Yard Parking Lot. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,060,000.
Marina Boulevard Improvements (Marina Master Plan Phase III) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Marina Blvd. from 3rd to end of Marina Blvd.
Description/Justification:
Reconfiguration of Marina Boulevard to reduce the number of travel lanes from 4 to 2 and add diagonal parking and green streets improvements to treat surface stormwater runoff. Proposed limits are from 3rd Street North to the end of Marina Boulevard. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,625,000.
Signal at Harbor Street/Central Ave
Project Manager: M. Ruiz
Location: Harbor Street/ Central Avenue
Description/Justification:
This project will design and construct a fully actuated traffic signal at the intersection of Harbor Street and Central Ave. The project will replace existing all-way stop controls at this intersection. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,000,000.
Traffic Signal Interconnect Expansion Project
Project Manager: M. Ruiz
Location: Citywide
Description/Justification:
This project will consist of signal interconnect cables, ethernet switches and wireless antennas for cellular service at traffic signal intersections. This will allow communication and transfer of operational data between traffic signal cabinets with City traffic network. From an operational perspective, this allows City and transportation staff the ability to monitor and maintain the traffic network and to allow full integration of new intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technologies. Since monitoring and changes can be performed from a remote traffic management location, this will ultimately reduce staff costs by not having to deploy signal technician staff to the site to perform operational changes. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,100,000.
James Donlon Boulevard Extension (Project 3015)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: James Donlon Blvd from the future terminus in Sky Ranch to Kirker Pass Rd.
Description/Justification:
This project will cover design and construction of an additional east-west connection between East and Central County by extending James Donlon Boulevard from its future terminus in Sky Ranch to Kirker Pass Road. The new roadway, formerly known as the Buchanan Road Bypass, will relieve congestion and other future travel demand on 113
Buchanan Road. This project has been identified as a priority project for East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority (ECCRFFA) up to 68% of the total project costs. This project is located outside of the current Pittsburg city limits. The current cost estimate for this project is $300,000,000.
Underground Utilities
Water Main Pressure Increase Upgrades Zones 1-2
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Citywide
Description/Justification:
As recommended from the Draft 2022 Water System Master Plan domestic water system improvements are necessary to mitigate existing capacity deficiencies. This project includes the improvements within Pressure Zones 1-2 for distribution main transmission lines with existing head loss deficiencies or velocity deficiencies. The current cost estimate for this project is $2,550,000.
Water Main Pressure Increase Upgrades Zones 3
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Citywide
Description/Justification:
As recommended from the Draft 2022 Water System Master Plan domestic water system improvements are necessary to mitigate existing capacity deficiencies. This project includes the improvements within Pressure Zone 3 for distribution main transmission lines with existing head loss deficiencies or velocity deficiencies. The current cost estimate for this project is $725,000.
Water Main Fire Flow UP Upgrades-Pressure Zone 1
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Citywide
Description/Justification:
As recommended from the Draft 2022 Water System Master Plan domestic water system improvements are necessary to mitigate severe fire flow deficiencies. This project includes the improvements within Pressure Zone 1 for distribution main transmission lines and fire hydrants. The current cost estimate for this project is $9,830,000.
Water Main Fire Flow UP Upgrades-Pressure Zone 2
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Citywide
Description/Justification:
As recommended from the Draft 2022 Water System Master Plan domestic water system improvements are necessary to mitigate severe fire flow deficiencies. This project includes the improvements within Pressure Zone 2 for distribution main transmission lines and fire hydrants. The current cost estimate for this project is $2,200,000.
Water Main Fire Flow UP Upgrades-Pressure Zone 3
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Citywide
Description/Justification:
As recommended from the Draft 2022 Water System Master Plan domestic water system improvements are necessary to mitigate severe fire flow deficiencies. This project includes the improvements within Pressure Zone 3 for distribution main transmission lines and fire hydrants. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,915,000. 114
Riverview Drive/Alturas Avenue 12” Canal Crossing
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Crossing Contra Costa Canal from Alturas Avenue/Riverview Drive and crossing Robinson Ave Description/Justification:
The project will include the removal and replacement of the existing 12” waterline. The project will also include the replacement of the canal crossing and the execution of a license agreement for future maintenance with Contra Costa Water District. The current cost estimate for this project is $187,500.
Zone 1/ Zone 2 Boundary Adjustments
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Leland Road corridor, bounded by Crestview Drive to the west, EBMUD right-of-way to the south, Freed Wat to the east, and Garcia Avenue to the north.
Description/Justification:
The project will construct improvements to the water distribution system to facilities and modifications of the pressure zone boundaries in the problem areas of pressure Zone 2. This current cost estimate for this project is $1,416,400.
Water Main Buchanan Road (Phase 2)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Between the Water Treatment Plant to Railroad Avenue and Loveridge Road/Ventura Avenue Description/Justification:
This project will provide a new water transmission line to meet domestic and fire flow requirements for existing development and new development in the southeast hills and infill development in Zone 2. The cost estimate for this project is $1,902,500.
12” Water Main Stoneman Avenue
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Stoneman Avenue from Harbor Street to Loveridge Road Description/Justification:
This project will include the installation of approximately 3,300-feet of 12-inch transmission main and will provide an additional system loop to enhance fire protection capabilities in Zone 2. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,000,000.
Pittsburg-Antioch Highway Water Line Improvements (Eastern Loop) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Pittsburg-Antioch Highway from Loveridge Road to Century Boulevard Description/Justification:
This project will provide 5,540 feet of 18-inch water line to initiate water service to business along Pittsburg-Antioch Highway, east of Loveridge. It will run from the east end of California Avenue and continue east on the highway to approximately 500 feet west of the City’s eastern limits and tie into Century Blvd to provide a looped system. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,500,000.
Highlands Ranch Zone 2 Reservoir
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Zone 2, Highlands Ranch Subdivision
Description/Justification:
115
The project is located southeast of the City, serving Zone 2 on the Highlands Ranch Subdivision. The project will include the construction of a 1.0-million-gallon reservoir in the area and will be located at an elevation of about 360 feet above the mean sea level. The current cost estimate for this project is $6,157,600.
Water Treatment Plant Filter Backwash Management- 1.5 MGD Package Treatment Unit (Phase1) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Water Treatment Plant
Description/Justification:
The project will construct a 1.5 million gallons per day (MGD) packaged treatment system for treating water filter backwash for recycling. A second treatment unit will be required in the future as the WTP gets closer to the design capacity of 32 MGD. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,875,000.
Water Treatment Plant Filter Backwash Management- 1.5 MGD Package Treatment Unit (Phase 2)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Water Treatment Plant
Description/Justification:
The project will construct a second 1.5 million gallons per day (MGD) packaged treatment system for treating water filter backwash for recycling. The second package system will allow the Water Treatment Plant to treat the maximum allowed recycled backwash water of 10% of the design capacity of 32 MGD. The current cost estimate for this project is $937,700.
Water Treatment Plant 0.5 MG Filter Backwash Basin
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Water Treatment Plant
Description/Justification:
This project will construct a 0.5-million-gallon (MG) backwash recycle basin with mixers to prevent settling prior to pumping the water to the backwash water package treatment units to be constructed with earlier projects. The current cost estimate for this project is $3,610,000.
Water Main Installation/ Replacement Program
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Black Diamond Road and West 10th Street to West Santa Fe (excluding Scudero Circle) Description/Justification:
The project will identify and replace water mains, services, and valves that have reached the end of their useful life and have become maintenance problems, and/or install mains to improve fire flow in localized areas. The current cost estimate for this project is $4,070,000.
1.3 MG Zone 1 Water Tank
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Near Delta View Golf Course
Description/Justification:
The project will provide additional water storage to meet domestic and fire flow requirements for the new infill development in Pressure Zone 1. The current cost estimate for this project is $6,245,000.
Water Main Installation Replacement Program
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Citywide
116
Description/Justification:
This project will identify and replace water mains, services, and valves that have reached the end of their useful life and have become maintenance problems, and/or install mains to improve fire flows in localized areas. The current cost estimate for this project is $3,600,000.
Water Treatment Plant Mechanical Sludge Dewatering
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Water Treatment Plant
Description/Justification:
This project will construct a mechanical sludge dewatering system for use once WTP operations reach 15 million gallons per day (MGD). The current system of dewatering by natural evaporation is adequate for flows up to the 15 MGD threshold. The current cost estimate for this project is $11,920,780.
Bart Specific Plan Sewer Main
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: 1600 West Leland Road
Description/Justification:
This project is contingent on development north of West Leland Road, west of Bailey Road. This project will construct a parallel 8” pipe parallel to State Route 4 on the south side and will be approximately 1000’ long to improve capacity for future development. The current cost estimate for this project is $340,800.
Highway 4 Trunk Line Relief (Segment B)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Along Highway 4 from Lislin Court to Bodega Court Description/Justification:
This project is the western segment (2,500 ft.) of the State Route 4 sewer trunk line that runs from Bailey Road to the PG&E easement, a total of 9,500 ft. This will be an increase from 12-inch pipe to 15-inch to accommodate new development. The current cost estimate for this project is $4,084,800.
Pittsburg/ Antioch (PA) Highway Sewer Line Improvements Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: PA Highway
Description/Justification:
This project will provide for the installation of approximately 3200 linear feet of 10” sewer line and laterals to connect to Delta Diablo manhole. The current cost estimate for this project is $726,000.
Praxiar Storm Water Diversion for Kirker Creek East of Loveridge Road Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: From the intersection of East California Ave and Loveridge Rd. to Kirker Creek Channel along Pittsburg Antioch Highway
Description/Justification:
This project will construct an overflow storm drain line to accept additional storm water capacity in a line that was constructed with Highway 4 widening from an existing 25-year storm to a 50-year storm. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,365,000.
117
West Leland Road Storm Drain Improvements (Crestview Drive to Burton Avenue) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Southwest Corner of Crestview Dr. and West Leland Rd. to Burton Ave.
Description/Justification:
This project includes construction of a new storm drain pipeline with inlets to prevent street flooding. The pipeline will begin with inlets located at the southwest corner of Crestview Drive and West Leland Road. The current cost estimate for this project is $800,000.
Kirker Creek Improvements (Loveridge Rd to DOW Channel) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Kirker Creek East of Loveridge Rd.
Description/Justification:
Construction of improvements to prevent flooding along Kirker Creek north of the Pittsburg Antioch Hwy. This project includes improving the underside pipes, culverts, and channels along Kirker Creek from Loveridge Road to Dow channel. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,330,000.
Kirker Creek Watershed (State Route 4 to Garcia Ave)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Kirker Creek from Hwy. 4 to Garcia Avenue
Description/Justification:
This project will improve all the undersized pipes, and channels from Hwy 4 to Garcia Avenue. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 8043, 8045, 8047, 8048, and 8049. This project includes 955’ of channel restoration to promote stormwater infiltration improvements and 260’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,875,000.
Kirker Creek Watershed (E Leland Rd to CC Canal)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Kirker Creek from East Leland Rd to south of Stoneman Avenue Description/Justification:
This project will improve all the undersized pipes and culverts from East Leland Road to the Contra Costa Canal.
These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 8053, 8057, 8061, and 8067. This project includes 147’ of culvert improvements and 478’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $345,000.
Kirker Creek Watershed (CC Canal to Buchanan Rd)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Kirker Creek from Contra Costa Canal to Buchanan Road Description/Justification:
This project will improve all the undersized pipes and culverts from the Contra Costa Canal to Buchanan Road. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 8071 and 8075. This project includes 425’ of culvert improvements and 114’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $520,000.
Kirker Creek Watershed (Buchanan Rd to Kingswood)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Kirker Creek Watershed from Contra Costa Canal to Kingswood Dr.
Description/Justification:
118
This project will improve all the undersized pipes, and channels from Buchanan Road to Kingswood. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 8077, 8083, 8085, and 8093. This project includes 412’ of channel improvements and 2,794’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $2,180,000.
Kirker Creek behind MLK School
Project Manager: J. Longway
Location: Culverts at the north end of the drainage channel behind MLK School crossing Pittsburg/Antioch Highway.
Description / Justification:
The 82” RCP culverts need to be de-silted to restore flow to the portion of the Kirker Creek Channel. Currently the channel is flowing at 40% of its capacity. Current estimate for de-silting is $650,000 Kirker Creek Watershed (Ventura Area)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Kirker Creek near Ventura Drive, Piedmont Way and Loveridge Road Description/Justification:
This project will improve the undersized pipes near Ventura Drive, Piedmont Way and Loveridge Road. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 8161, 8189, and 8227.
This project includes 212’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $205,000.
Kirker Creek Watershed (Stoneman Ave/ Contra Costa Canal) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Kirker Creek Watershed near Stoneman Avenue and the Contra Costa Canal.
Description/Justification:
This project will improve all the undersized pipes and culverts in the area of Stoneman Avenue and the Contra Costa Canal. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 8179, 8183, 8240, and 8243. This project includes 265’ of culvert improvements and 1350’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,110,000.
Kirker Creek Watershed (Los Medanos College Area)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Kirker Creek Watershed in the vicinity of Los Medanos College Description/Justification:
This project will improve all the undersized pipes, in the vicinity of Los Medanos College and south of the Contra Costa Canal. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 8271, 8280, and 8289. This project includes 1010’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $685,000.
Kirker Creek @ Piedmont Channel
Project Manager: J. Longway
Location: Drainage corridor to the east of Kelly Court, from Garcia Avenue to Highway 4 Description / Justification:
Approximately 800 feet of the bottom of the concrete channel is severely deteriorated, and is in need of replacement. ( identified as nodes 8043,8045,and 8161 in the 991 Stormwater Master Plan) The bottom of the concrete ditch is broken; pieces of concrete missing. Current estimate is $200,000 Lawlor Creek Watershed (State Route 4 to Leland Road)
119
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Lawlor Creek Watershed from Hwy. 4 to West Leland Road.
Description/Justification:
This project will improve all the undersized pipes in the Lawlor Creek Watershed from Hwy 4 to West Leland Road.
These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 3039 and 3041.
This project includes 986’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $540,000.
Lawlor Creek Watershed (Contra Costa Canal to Santa Maria Drive) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Lawlor Creek Watershed from Contra Costa Canal to Santa Maria Drive Description/Justification:
This project will improve all the undersized pipes in the Lawlor Creek Watershed from Contra Costa Canal to Santa Maria Drive. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 3083 and 3091. This project includes 363’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $200,000.
Lawlor Creek Watershed (West Leland Rd to Oak Hills Circle) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Lawlor Creek Watershed from Contra Costa Canal to Oak Hills Cr.
Description/Justification:
This project will improve all the undersized pipes in the Lawlor Creek Watershed from West Leland Road to Oak Hills Circle. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 3137 and 3138. This project includes 1058’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $520,000.
Watershed 4 (Willow Pass Road to Contra Costa Canal)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Watershed 4: Willow Pass Road to Contra Costa Canal Description/Justification:
Watershed 4 is drained via natural swales and channels to the storm drainage system in developed areas north and south of Highway 4. This project will improve all the undersized pipes in Watershed 4 from Willow Pass Road to Contra Costa Canal. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 4017 and 4039. This project includes 392’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $155,000.
Watershed 4 (Leland Road to Sugartree Drive)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Watershed 4: West Leland Road to Sugartree Drive Description/Justification:
Watershed 4 is drained via natural swales and channels to the storm drainage system in developed areas north and south of Highway 4. This project will improve all the undersized pipes in Watershed 4 from West Leland Road to Sugartree Drive. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduit 4051. This project includes 802’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $260,000.
Watershed 4 (Rock Ridge Way to end of Jacqueline Drive) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Rock Ridge Way to Jacqueline Drive
Description/Justification:
Watershed 4 is drained via natural swales and channels to the storm drainage system in developed areas north and south of Highway 4. This project will improve all the undersized pipes in Watershed 4 from Rock Ridge Way to 120
Jacqueline Drive Terminus. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 4071 and 4073. This project includes 2,864’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $695,000.
Watershed 5 (Highway 4 to Paige Court)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Watershed 5: Hwy4 to Paige Ct
Description/Justification:
Watershed 5 drains entirely residential developments north and south of Highway 4 via storm drains. This project will improve the 24” pipe in Watershed 5 from Highway 4 to Paige Court. This is the only deficiency identified in Watershed 5. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduit 5053.
This project includes 212’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $60,000.
Watershed 6 (City Park Storm Drain)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Watershed 6: City Park
Description/Justification:
Watershed 6 encompasses downtown Pittsburg and includes two areas, downtown Pittsburg and just south of Hwy
4. This project will improve undersized pipes in Watershed 6 in City Park. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 6313, 6315, and 6317. This project includes 1,926’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $710,000.
Watershed 6 (Dover Way Storm Drain)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Watershed 6: Dover Way
Description/Justification:
Watershed 6 encompasses areas in downtown Pittsburg and just south of Highway 4. This project will improve undersized pipes in Watershed 6 on Dover Way and Crestview. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 6481, 6491, 6493, 6503, 6505, 6507, and 6509. This project includes 3,426’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,135,000.
Watershed 6 (CC Canal/Crestview Drive to Ramona Drive/Linscheid Drive) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Alturas Avenue to Linscheid Drive
Description/Justification:
Watershed 6 encompasses downtown Pittsburg and an area just south of State Route 4. This project will improve undersized pipes in Watershed 6 along the Contra Costa Canal, north of Alturas Avenue, to Ramona Drive/Linscheid Drive. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 6561, 6563, 6564, 6565, and 6567. This project includes 4,139’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,390,000.
Watershed 6 (Storm Drain Easement Area @ Lois and Ramona Streets) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Storm Drainage Easement Area behind homes on Lois Avenue, From Ramona Street to Pacini Avenue Description / Justification: The existing storm drainage ditch and retaining walls behind the homes located along Lois Avenue is damaged; some portions of the wall are already offset. Approximately 930 feet of open ditch to be replaces with RCP pipe. Current estimate is $1,000,000
121
Watershed 6 (Harbor Street/River Outfall to Harbor Street/School Street) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Watershed 6 on Harbor Street from the River Outfall to School Street Description/Justification:
Watershed 6 encompasses downtown Pittsburg and an area just south of State Route 4. This project will improve undersized pipes in Watershed 6 on Harbor Street from the river outfall to School Street. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 6003, 6005, 6007, 6011, 6013, 6015, 6019, 6023, and 6043. This project includes 4,992’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,330,000.
Watershed 6 (Harbour Drive/Morro Drive to Brighton Drive) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Watershed 6: Stone Harbour Drive from Morrow Drive to Brighton Drive Description/Justification:
Watershed 6 encompasses downtown Pittsburg and an area just south of State Route 4. This project will improve undersized pipes in Watershed 6 on Stone Harbour Drive from Morro Drive to Brighton Drive. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 6054, 6055, and 6057. This project includes 1,793’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $460,000.
Watershed 6 (Cumberland Drive/3rd Street to Railroad Ave/ 7th Street) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location:
Watershed 6: Downtown area
Description/Justification:
Watershed 6 encompasses downtown Pittsburg and an area just south of State Route 4. This project will improve undersized pipes in Watershed 6 in the downtown area. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 6109, 6111, 6113, and 6115. This project includes 2,061’ of pipe improvements. The current cost estimate for this project is $565,000.
Watershed 6 (Marina Blvd and Bayside Drive)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location:
Watershed 6: Marina Blvd and Bayside Drive
Description/Justification:
Watershed 6 encompasses downtown Pittsburg and an area just south of State Route 4. This project will improve undersized pipes in Watershed 6 on Marina Blvd and Bayside Drive. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 6165 and 6207. This project includes 593’ of pipe improvements.
The current cost estimate for this project is $182,000.
Watershed 6 (8th St/Railroad Ave to 8th Street Outfall at Montezuma Slough) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Watershed 6: 8th Street from Herb White Way/Montezuma Street to Railroad Avenue Description/Justification:
This project will improve undersized pipes in Watershed 6 along West Eighth Street and Herb White Way. These improvements were identified in the July 1999, Stormwater Management Plan as conduits 6257, 6258, 6260, and 6263. This project includes 2,154’ of pipe improvements. This project will also include stormwater controls to redirect surface stormwater runoff to vegetated areas to filter and manage stormwater flow. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,105,000.
122
Stoneman Ave Storm Drain Replacement/Repair
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Stoneman Avenue between Meadowbrook Circle and Briarcliff Description/Justification:
This project will replace/repair the collapsed 24” storm drain line and inlets on Stoneman Avenue between Meadowbrook Circle and Briarcliff Drive. The estimated cost estimate for this project is $1,155,000.
Storm Drain Repairs on Buchanan Road/ West Leland Road
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Buchanan Road/ West Leland Road
Description/Justification:
Significant settlement is occurring at Buchanan Road east of Harbor Street and at W Leland Road near John Henry Johnson Drive where existing storm drainpipes cross the road. CCTV had identified deficiencies in the storm drainpipe at the Buchanan Road location and the exact cause of the settlement at W Leland is unknown at this time.
Work will include investigation, design, and construction for the replacement and/or in-place repair of existing storm drain piping and repair to the roadway surface to correct the settled areas and prevent future settlement. The current cost estimate for this project is $335,000.
Kirker Creek Bank Stabilization
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Kirker Creek at Pittsburg/Antioch Highway
Description/Justification:
This project will construct two segments of soldier pile walls to stabilize the southern creek bank along PittsburgAntioch Highway. The current cost estimate for this project is $200,000.
City Parking Lot Retrofit at Pittsburg-Antioch Highway (Green Infrastructure Project) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Harbor Street and Pittsburg-Antioch Highway
Description/Justification:
This project will retrofit the existing surrounding landscaped areas within the existing parking lot and divert surface stormwater runoff into bioretention or vegetated areas. The current cost estimate for this project is $945,000.
Riverview Park (Green Infrastructure Project)
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Riverview Park
Description/Justification:
The project will incorporate vegetated swales and bioretention areas to receive surface stormwater runoff from adjacent roadways, paths, parking areas. The current cost estimate for this project is $945,000.
Americana Park Basin Retrofit (Green Infrastructure Project) Project Manager: J. Longway
Location: North Parkside Drive
Description/Justification:
To alleviate chronic flooding on North Parkside Drive, the retention pond located in Americana Park will include improvements to the storage capacity for stormwater flows, and install a flow-controlled outlet 123
structure. In addition, bioretention treatment will be constructed alongside the roadway for water quality treatment and assist to alleviate roadway flooding. Current estimate for this project is $1,650,000 Environmental Center Parking Area Improvements (Green Infrastructure Project) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Environmental Center in Pittsburg
Description/Justification:
This project will construct improvements to divert surface stormwater runoff to vegetated bioretention areas. The current cost estimate for this project is $845,000.
Marina Parking Lot Modifications (Green Infrastructure Project) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Marina Parking Lot
Description/Justification:
This project aims to construct improvements to the Marina parking lot landscaped areas to receive surface stormwater runoff for treatment. The current cost estimate for this project is $700,000.
Buchanan Park Parking Lot Retrofit (Green Infrastructure Project) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Buchanan Park Parking Lot
Description/Justification:
The project is located at the parking lot in Buchanan Park on Buchanan Road and Harbor Street. The project will divert the surface stormwater runoff from the parking lot area into vegetated swales and bioretention pockets throughout the parking lot area. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,040,000.
Railroad Avenue Bulb Out Retrofit (Green Infrastructure Project) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Railroad Avenue from 10th Street to 3rd Street Description/Justification:
This project aims to retrofit the existing bulb outs at the intersections on Railroad Avenue from 10th street to 3rd street, to receive the surface stormwater runoff from the concrete valley gutters and divert through vegetated treatment areas. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,110,000.
Range Road-Roadway Bioretention (Green Infrastructure Project) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: End of Range Road, south of State Route 4
Description/Justification:
This project aims to construct roadway bioretention improvements at the end of Range Road to receive roadway stormwater runoff for treatment, and neighborhood greenway feature. The current cost estimate of this project is $560,000.
Willow Pass Road Roadway Bioretention (Green Infrastructure Project) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Willow Pass Road
Description/Justification:
This project will construct 3,000 linear feet of bioswales on the north and south sides of Willow Pass Road to treat surface stormwater runoff from the adjacent roadway. The current cost estimate for this project is $620,000. 124
Linscheid Drive Sewer Rehab
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Linscheid Drive
Description/Justification:
Approximately 700 LF of sewer pipe to be removed. The sewer line in question was supposed to be abandoned in sewer rehab projects 2008-26 / 2009-10. There are no active utilities for city of Pittsburg to maintain within the Sewer Easement. The easement is hindering homeowners’ ability to build in their backyards due to regulations against building structures over easements. To release the easement, we will need to finish the abandonment of the sewer line first.
Community Facilities
Police Evidence Storage Building
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: City Hall
Description/Justification:
This project will involve the design and construction of evidence storage building, including plumbing, electrical, ventilation and security components for the processing and storage of evidence for the Pittsburg Police Department.
Building components must comply with various codes, regulations and best practices for law enforcement investigation and safety. The current cost estimate for this project is $645,000.
Purchase Corp Yard Annex
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: 369 East 12th Street
Description/Justification:
The City of Pittsburg currently leases the maintenance shop just east of the Corporation Yard. This project will purchase that land and make it an addition to the City’s Corporation yard. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,650,000.
Civic Center Parking Structure
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: City Hall
Description/Justification:
This project will construct a parking structure near City Hall and the Courthouse for use by both facilities. The current cost estimate for this project is 2,280,000.
Downtown Parking Structure
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Downtown Pittsburg
Description/Justification:
This project will construct a new parking lot at East 5th Street to increase available parking for the downtown area.
In addition, bioretention treatment areas will be constructed to treat surface stormwater runoff. The current cost estimate for this project is $5,280,000.
Civic Center Repair
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Civic Center
125
Description/Justification:
This project will complete major repair projects for the Civic Center that come up including HVAC repair, roof repair, and carpet. The current cost estimate for this project is $250,000.
Civic Center/ Senior Center EOC Upgrades
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Civic Center & Senior Center
Description/Justification:
This project will complete the required upgrades needed for the City’s Emergency Center at both the Civic Center and Senior Center. The current cost estimate for this project is $85,000.
East 8th Street Underground Utilities (Railroad Ave to Harbor St) Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: East 8th Street
Description/Justification:
This project will remove overhead utilities and place them underground along East Eighth Street and the linear park from Railroad Avenue to Harbor Street. The current cost estimate for this project is $985,000.
PG&E Street Light Facilities Acquisition
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Citywide
Description/Justification:
This will provide funding to buy out streetlights from PG&E so they can be City owned and maintained, instead of the City paying PG&E for maintenance. There are approximately 3,671 PG&E-owned streetlights in the City. The City currently owns approximately 32%, or 1,163 of the 4,834 streetlights in the City. This project will not only save the City annual operating funds but will allow the Public Works Department to provide improved and more responsive service to streetlight complaints. The current cost estimate for this project is $1,050,000.
PARKS
All Abilities Playground
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Citywide
Description/Justification:
This project aims to design and construct an All-Abilities Playground within a city park with amenities accessible and appropriate for use by children of all abilities. The current cost estimate for this project is $2,238,000.
Buchanan Park Renovations
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Buchanan Park
Description/Justification:
The project would add the following new amenities to the existing Buchanan Park: basketball court, splash pad, public art, and will replace the existing community center with a larger LEED certified center, replace deteriorated pedestrian walkways with pervious pathways and expand and resurface parking areas. The community center is proposed to be an expansion to 8,000 sf from the current 3,000 sf facility. The outdoor space designated for outdoor recreation and open space at the park comprised more than half of the area of the 16-acre park. The current cost estimate for this project is $9,140,000.
126
Buchanan Park School Age Playground
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Buchanan Park
Description/Justification:
This project will install a school age playground to the north of the Buchanan Center building to benefit those families using the facility and the group picnic area. The current cost estimate for this project is $345,000.
Buchanan Swim Center Improvements/ Solar Heating
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Buchanan Swim Center
Description/Justification:
This project will install a solar system to supplement the heating and improve the parking lot. The current cost estimate for this project is $330,000.
Buchanan Park Restrooms
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Buchanan Park
Description/Justification:
This project will install a new restroom facility at Buchanan Park. City staff will evaluate different restroom manufactures to analyze which restroom facility includes features to best address some of the current issues being experienced at this park such as vandalism, misuse, lighting, etc.
CASP Accessibility Improvements in Parks
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Citywide Park System
Description/Justification:
This project aims to install, repair, or construct improvements at City owned parks as recommended by Certified Access Specialist Program (CASP) – ADA survey of facilities and prioritized by Public Works staff. The current cost estimate for this project is $255,000.
Outdoor Fitness Area
Project Manager: K. Simonton
Location: Marina Boulevard
Description/Justification:
This project includes the construction of an all-abilities outdoor fitness area. Access to health and wellness is a vital part of a thriving community. An outdoor fitness area ensures that all members of Pittsburg have access to overcome their obstacles in becoming healthier. The court includes 10 units that may serve up to 27 people at one time and includes accessible equipment and access. The current cost estimate for this project is $200,000.
DeAnza Park Walkway Rehabilitation and Basketball Court Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Delta DeAnza Park
Description/Justification:
This project aims to rehabilitate/repair/reconstruct deteriorated walkways and to design and construct a basketball court at De Anza Park. It will also include the installation of bioretention treatment areas to treat surface stormwater runoff. The current cost estimate for this project is $560,000. 127
Dredge Buchanan Park Pond
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: Buchanan Park
Description/Justification:
This project will dredge the 1-acre pond at Buchanan Park to its original design depth of four feet. The current cost estimate for this project is $260,000.
City Park Field Replacement
Project Manager: M. Mena
Location: City Park
Description/Justification:
This project will make improvements and repairs to the existing soccer field and baseball fields at City Park.
Improvements could include new fields, irrigation, fencing, dugouts, and other amenities. The current cost estimate for this project is $2,500,000
MARINA
Marina Trail Construction
Project Manager: S. Bellafronte
Location: Sea Point Way
Description/Justification:
This project will remove existing concrete and convert the existing walkway to a trail made of recycled aggregate base. The project limits are on the shoreside of the Mean High Water Line and will not impact the water.
Supplemental Information:
The walkway is in disrepair due to diminishing riprap along the eastern border of Lowy Basin. In association with the Waterfront Breakwater Maintenance Project, this project aims to convert the walkway into a trail and manage the large scenic tree at the northernmost end of the walkway. Options for managing the tree to provide public safety include trimming or removal. In 2022, project costs were estimated at $195,000. This project was not included in the Waterfront or Marina budgets for FY 24.
128
2026/27 — 2030/31
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDIX A : GLOSSARY
OF FUNDING
This page was intentionally left blank.
130
This document includes various funds, their names, descriptions, what type of projects they are used for and the sources of these funds.
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) (298)
This bill provides additional relief to address the continued impact of COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019) on the economy, public health, state and local governments, individuals, and businesses.
BAAQMD’s Charge
This is a grant that helps offset a portion of the cost of purchasing and installing new publicly available charging stations at qualifying facilities and private charging stations to serve fleets and multi-family housing locations within BAAQMD’s jurisdiction. Under the Charge! Program, Pittsburg is considered a disadvantaged and low-income community based on the California Climate Investments Priority Populations 2022 CES 4.0.
The City will install 11 dual port Level 2 EV chargers at workplaces for the City Fleet. This qualifies Pittsburg for a higher tier of program funding, and this funding can be layered with other outside funding sources and incentive programs, making this an impactful opportunity for the City’s progress toward reducing city-wide transportation emissions and maintaining a balanced budget.
Building Maintenance Fund (BMF) (621)
The City’s Building Maintenance Fund covers ongoing maintenance of City-owned buildings.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (233)
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program supports community development activities to build stronger and more resilient communities. To support community development, activities are identified through an ongoing process. Activities may address needs such as infrastructure, economic development projects, public facilities installation, community centers, housing rehabilitation, public services, clearance/acquisition, microenterprise assistance, code enforcement, homeowner assistance, etc.
Gas Tax Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) (202) Senate Bill 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, was signed into law on April 28, 2017. SB 1 increased the per gallon fuel excise taxes; increased the diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration fees; and provides for inflationary adjustments to tax rates in future years. This legislative package invests $54 billion over the next decade to fix roads, freeways, and bridges in communities across California and puts more dollars toward transit and safety.
These funds are split equally between state and local investments.
General Fund (110)
The General Fund’s major revenue sources include property and sales taxes, franchise taxes, other taxes, and intergovernmental revenue, permits, licenses and fees.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-State-owned roads and roads on tribal land. The HSIP requires a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads with a focus on performance.
Highway User Tax Account Gas Tax Fund (HUTA) (201)
The state of California imposes per-gallon excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel, sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel and registration taxes on motor vehicles with allocations dedicated to transportation purposes. 131
Infrastructure Repair and Replacement Fund (IRRF)
On January 22, 2013, the City Council adopted Ordinance 12-1363, also known as the Fiscal Sustainability Ordinance.
This ordinance established minimum balances for financial reserves used to stabilize the City’s budget and created an Infrastructure Repair and Replacement Fund that receives a portion of funds that exceed the required reserve amount. This fund may be used for repairs and capital improvements projects related to the City’s infrastructure including streets, roads, parking lots, and storm drains.
Island Energy Funds (IE) and 590 Pittsburg Power (PPC) (580) The Pittsburg Power Company (PPC) is a municipal utility formed under the California Constitution. The PPC does business in the City of Pittsburg and as Island Energy (IE) on Mare Island located in Vallejo, California. PPC develops revenue streams for the City of Pittsburg while retaining existing businesses and attracting new business. Island Energy distributes natural gas and electricity to the industries, schools, businesses, and residents on Mare Island.
Island Energy’s focus is to build capital asset value and income for the City of Pittsburg as Mare Island is redeveloped over time.
Kirker Creek Drainage Fund (KCDF) (302)
The Kirker Creek Drainage Fund was established to provide for improvements to the drainage area due to impacts from new development. This fee is charged only for new development within the Kirker Creek watershed. Currently the fee is $1.14/sf of impervious area for the development. This fund can be used for construction of drainage improvements within the Kirker Creek watershed.
Local Traffic Mitigation Fund (LTMF) (303)
In order to implement the goals of the circulation element of the city’s general plan and, more specifically, the transportation improvements contained in the capital improvement program, and to mitigate the transportation impacts caused by new development in the city, certain public road improvements must be or had to be constructed.
The city council has determined that a transportation mitigation fee is needed to finance these public improvements and to pay for new development’s fair share of the construction costs of these improvements.
Marina Enterprise Fund (ME) (550)
The Marina Enterprise Fund is composed of funds collected at the Pittsburg Marina from boat slip rentals and gasoline sales. These funds are used to maintain and improve the various marina facilities. Per Ordinance 12-1363 a minimum of 30% of annual operating costs shall be maintained in reserve.
Measure J (MJ) (204)
In 2004, Contra Costa County voters approved Measure J, which continued the ½ cent sales tax that funds transportation projects in the county through March 31, 2034. Pittsburg’s Measure J funds are used for street pavement projects as funding is available. However, using this fund only for street pavement projects reduces funds available for other eligible projects, such as traffic signals. In addition, the City currently uses Measure J Funds to help fund the Public Works Department’s Street operations and maintenance (O&M) to off-set General Fund revenues.
Measure M (MM) (111)
In 2012, 73 percent of Pittsburg voters approved an increase to the local sales tax for 10 years to fund local Pittsburg services. Known as Measure P, it added a half-cent sales tax for five years to local purchases, amounting to an extra 50 cents on a $100 purchase. The sales tax was planned to decrease to one-quarter-cent sales tax in 2017, and then expire in 2022. The sales tax revenue is a guaranteed funding source for essential city services, including public safety, code enforcement, the Senior Center and support for job programs that benefit local residents. Measure M will extend the current half-cent sales tax to 2035 and continue to support these programs, plus youth services, road repairs and services for victims of domestic violence. The measure continues an existing tax at its current level. 132
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) (207) The NPDES Program is a federal program which has been delegated to the State of California for implementation through the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Regional Water Boards), collectively Water Boards. In California, NPDES permits are also referred to as waste discharge requirements (WDRs) that regulate discharges to waters of the United States.
One Bay Area Grant (OBAG)
The One Bay Area Grant, now in its third iteration, guides how MTC distributes federal transportation funding from the Federal Highway Administration to projects and programs that improve safety, spur economic development, and help the Bay Area meet climate change and air quality improvement goals.
Park Dedication Fees (PDF) (304)
Park Dedication Fees are collected from developers to provide for construction of new parks and recreation facilities.
Fees are collected based on the market value of the property, size of development, and number of units.
PG&E Rule 20A & 20B (Credits)
• Rule 20A projects are 100 percent ratepayer-funded but must meet public interest criteria. The utilities annually allocate Rule 20A work credits (or “work credits”) to cities and unincorporated counties (hereafter, “communities”) to redeem for their undergrounding project costs. Under Rule 20A Section 2, 50 percent of the work credit allocation is based on the ratio of overhead meters in a community relative to the total utility overhead meters. The other 50 percent is based on the ratio of total meters (both overhead and underground-served meters) relative to the utility total system meters. Rule 20A work credit allocations are established through the electric utilities’ General Rate Cases. A community may “borrow” up to five years of future work credits to fund an undergrounding project. • Rule 20B projects may be for any undergrounding purpose but must consist of a minimum of 600 feet.
Ratepayers fund around 20 to 40 percent of the costs of these projects. The applicant bears the balance of the project cost. Local government applicants may request the utility initially fund their Rule 20B project's engineering and design costs and reimburse the utility later provided that the project goes forward.
Pittsburg Regional Traffic Mitigation Fund (PRTMF)
These fees are collected from developers to pay for developer’s share of regional projects to mitigate impacts to streets and traffic flow. These funds are restricted to projects that are included in the current regional fee program.
Pittsburg Regional Transportation Development Impact Mitigation Fee (PRTDIM) The cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Pittsburg, and Oakley together with the county of Contra Costa, entered into an agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 6500 et seq., entitled “East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement” (the “agreement”), which provides for the creation of a separate joint powers agency (“ECCRFFA”), to assist in the establishment of a uniform regional development fee program and the funding and implementation of transportation improvement projects in the east county area. The four cities listed above, and the county are the “member agencies” of ECCRFFA.
Public Education and Government Fund (PEG)
The Public Education and Government is a special revenue fund in which the City is given authority from California Public Utilities Code to levy State Franchise Holder. The revenue of this fund supports Public Education and Government channel facilities.
Safe Routes to BART Grant (SR2B)
133
Safe Routes to BART (SR2B) is a grant program sponsored by BART using voter-approved Measure RR capital funds.
SR2B is designed to help local agencies improve access for BART customers traveling to BART stations by walking and biking. Grants to local jurisdictions in Alameda, Contra Costa and San Francisco Counties using Measure RR capital funds will help our partner agencies deliver capital projects for the streets, sidewalks, trails, and plazas that serve riders on their way to and from BART.
Safe Routs to School Grant (SR2S)
The Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Needs Assessment is a comprehensive assessment of existing SR2S projects and programs occurring throughout Contra Costa County. The purpose was to understand SR2S activities throughout Contra Costa County, estimate funding needed to support future SR2S capital improvements and programs, provide resources to local communities as they plan, design, and implement improvements, and offer technical assistance to school sites.
Sewer Facility Reserve Fund (SFR)
The Sewer Facility Reserve is funded by a one-time charge per residential unit paid by developers. The amount of the fee varies according to the location of the development and is calculated according to a formula described in the fee schedule approved by the City Council (Resolution No. 05-10291 and as amended by 05-10372). The average fee for a new residential unit is $3,753. This fund is used for expansion and upgrade of the sewer system to account for increased usage with new development.
Sewer Operations Fund (SOF) (521)
The Sewer Fund is maintained by a service charge that is collected in water service bills. Fees collected vary by property use. For example, a residential property is charged a flat rate of $15.79/month and non-residential is charged $1.61 per CCF, or 100 cubic feet (748 gallons), of water usage/month. These funds are used for installing, upgrading, and maintaining the City’s sewer system. Per Ordinance 12-1363 a minimum of 30% of annual operating costs shall be maintained in reserve.
Solid Waste (210)
Under the Recycling Center and Transfer Stations (RCTS) operating agreement with the Contra Costa Waste Service, Inc. (CCWS), the City receives a Recycling and Inspection Fee of a flat rate ($1.91/ton effective October 2018) plus annual CPI adjustment on all solid waste and recycled material accepted at the transfer station. Solid Waste Management creates and implements programs and services for schools, City offices, businesses, and the community by promoting waste prevention, reuse, and recycling to meet the state mandated, AB 939 (50 percent waste diversion requirements
Transportation Development Act (TDA)
Transportation Development Act (TDA) of 1971, this law provides funding to be allocated to transit and non-transit related purposes that comply with regional transportation plans. TDA established two funding sources; the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), and the State Transit Assistance (STA) fund.
Water Facility Reserve Fund (WFR)
The Water Facility Reserve is funded by a onetime charge per residential unit paid by developers. The amount of the fee varies according to the location of the development and is calculated according to a formula described in the fee schedule approved by the City Council (Resolution 05-1029 and as amended by Resolution 12-11778). The average fee for per new residential unit is $5,807. This fund is used for expansion and upgrade of the water distribution system or treatment plant to account for increased use with new development.
Waterfront Grants Fund (541)
134
This fund is the landing place for grants that the Waterfront Division gets. It is important that the grant funding be in a separate fund for reporting and tracking pour poses. The Waterfront Fund, 540 is also subject to 30% reserves which would fluctuate inappropriately if grant funding were to mingle with operating funds.
Waterfront Operations Fund (WO) (540)
City's Waterfront Fund: revenues come from industrial Tidelands leases managed by the City. California Senate Bill 551 of 2011 enacted a grant of sovereign tidelands and submerged lands (“Tidelands”) within City boundaries to the City of Pittsburg. Prior to 2011, the State Lands Commission had entered into long term leases of Tidelands parcels within City boundaries. With the passage of SB 551, by operation of law, the City became lessor in place of the State of California for all existing leases of Tidelands.
Water Operations Fund (WOF) (501)
The Water Fund is maintained by a service charge that is collected in water service bills. Fees collected vary by size of water meter and water use and range from $29.60/mo for a ¾” meter to $3,360/mo for a 10” meter. These funds are used for installing, upgrading, and maintaining the City’s water system. Per Ordinance 12-1363 a minimum of 30% of annual operating costs shall be maintained in reserve. 135
This page was intentionally left blank.
136
2026/27 — 2030/31
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDIX B: ACRONYMS
This page was intentionally left blank.
138
ACRONYMS
This document includes numerous abbreviations and acronyms in need of explanation. Thus, a list of acronyms is provided to aid the reader when the context does not define the meaning.
ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act
AMR – Automatic Meter Reading
ARPA – American Rescue Plan Act
BART – Bay Area Rapid Transit
BMF – Building Maintenance Fund
CALTRANS – California Department of
Transportation
CCC – Contra Costa County
CCWD – Contra Costa Water District
CCTA – Contra Costa Transportation Authority
CCTV – Closed-Circuit Television
CDBG – Community Development Block Grant
CFD – Community Facilities District
CIP – Capital Improvement Program
DD – Delta Diablo
ECCRFFA – East Contra Costa Regional Fee and
Financing Authority
FY – Fiscal Year
GAAP – Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GASB – Governmental Accounting Standards
Board
GFOA – Government Finance Officers Association
HSIP – Highway Safety Improvement Program
HUTA – Highway User Tax Account Gas Tax Fund
IE – Island Energy
IRRF – Infrastructure Repair and Replacement
Fund
KCDF – Kirker Creek Drainage Fund
LED – Light-Emitting Diode
LF – Linear Foot/Feet
LLDA – Landscape and Lighting District Assessment
LTMF – Local Traffic Mitigation Fund
ME – Marina Operations Fund
MG – Millions of Gallons
MGD – Millions of Gallons Per Day
MJ – Measure J
MM – Measure M
MTC – Metropolitan Transportation Commission
NPDES – National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System
OBAG – One Bay Area Grant
O&M – Operating and Maintenance
PDF – Park Dedication Fees
PCI – Pavement Condition Index
PG&E – Pacific Gas & Electric
PMP – Pavement Management Program
PPC – Pittsburg Power Company
PRTDIM – Pittsburg Regional Transportation
Development Impact Mitigation Fee
PRTMF – Pittsburg Regional Traffic Mitigation
Fund
RMRA – Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Account
ROW – Right-of-Way
S&P – Standard and Poor’s Rating Service
SB – Senate Bill
SCADA – Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SR2B – Safe Routes to BART Grant
SR2S – Safe Routs to School Grant
SRF – State Water Resources Control Board
Revolving Fund
SFR – Sewer Facility Reserve Fund
SOF – Sewer Operations Fund
SS – Sewer
ST – Streets
TDA – Transportation Development Act
VFD – Variable Frequency Drive
WF – Waterfront Fund
WFR – Water Facility Reserve Fund
WOF – Water Operations Fund
WTP – Water Treatment Plant
139
This page was intentionally left blank.
140
2026/27 — 2030/31
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDIX C: CURRENT
PROJECT TOTALS
This page was intentionally left blank.
142
City of Pittsburg CIP Current Projects Totals
65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565 | Tel: (925) 252-4930 City of Pittsburg 2026/27 – 2030/31 Capital Improvement Program CIP Current Projects Totals
143
City of Pittsburg CIP Current Projects Totals
65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565 | Tel: (925) 252-4930 City of Pittsburg 2026/27 – 2030/31 Capital Improvement Program 144
City of Pittsburg CIP Current Projects Totals
65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565 | Tel: (925) 252-4930 City of Pittsburg 2026/27 – 2030/31 Capital Improvement Program 145
This page was intentionally left blank.
146
2026/27— 2030/31
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDIX D: PROJECT
SUMMARY
This page was intentionally left blank.
148
5-year CIP 2026/27 – 2030/31
Roadway Infrastructure
Project Summary
149
5-year CIP 2026/27 – 2030/31
Item No. Finance No. Project Name Estimated Project Cost Funding
Identified Funding Available
Existing Allocation = (E)
New Allocation = (N)
Future Allocation = (F)
Current Project Funding FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 Total Funding 150
5-year CIP 2026/27 – 2030/31
Underground Utilities
Project Summary
151
5-year CIP 2026/27 – 2030/31
Community Facilities
Project Summary
PARK PROJECTS
Project Summary
152
5-year CIP 2026/27 – 2030/31
MARINA PROJECTS
Project Summary
POWER PROJECTS
Project Summary
153
This page was intentionally left blank.
154
2026/27— 2030/31
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPENDIX E: PROJECT
INDEX
This page was intentionally left blank.
156
City of Pittsburg Project Index
65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565 | Tel: (925) 252-4930 City of Pittsburg 2026/27 – 2030/31 Capital Improvement Program 157
City of Pittsburg Project Index
65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565 | Tel: (925) 252-4930 City of Pittsburg 2026/27 – 2030/31 Capital Improvement Program
Debt Obligations
Debt Obligations and Bonded Debt Margin
From time-to-time, the City borrows money to provide up-front financing for facilities that are needed prior to when actual cash would otherwise be available. Typically, such borrowing is used for major capital facility acquisition or construction where an identifiable future revenue stream can be reasonably anticipated to be used for repayment. The City of Pittsburg presents debt information in three categories, each reflecting a distinct legal obligation and funding source. Understanding the differences between these categories is essential for accurately assessing the City’s financial obligations and budgetary capacity.
Tier Category Who Owes It How It’s Paid
1 City Primary
Government Debt City of Pittsburg City revenues — directly affects budget 2 Successor Agency
Debt
Successor Agency
(legally separate entity —
NOT the City of
Pittsburg)
RPTTF distributions (County to
trustee directly) — Successor
Agency budget impact
3 Special Assessment /
Conduit Debt
Property owners within
assessment districts
Property assessments and special
taxes — no City obligation
Only Tier 1 debt directly affects the City’s budget, debt service funds, or debt capacity. Tier 2 and Tier 3 debt are disclosed for transparency, but carry no City repayment obligation.
City Primary Government Debt
The following represents debt for which the City of Pittsburg bears full legal responsibility. Annual debt service on these obligations is incorporated into the City’s operating and capital budgets.
General obligation debt is subject to the California statutory debt limit of 15% of assessed valuation.
City of Pittsburg — Tier 1: Primary Government Debt
Direct obligations of the City of Pittsburg, payable from City revenues Debt Obligation Interest
Rate
Final
Maturity
Balance
June 30,
2025
Due Within
One Year
Subject
to Debt
Limit
Governmental Activities — Bonds
2006 Pension
Obligation Bonds
5.85%–
6.12%
July
2036
$35,025,000 $2,855,000 Yes
Governmental Activities — Direct Borrowings & Leases
PG&E Energy Efficient
Loan
0% 2028 60,440 21,329 No
Lease — GatewayDomus Building3.7% 2028 262,111 113,809 No Lease — PAC Art
Centre
3.7% 2027 71,796 44,558 No
Subtotal — Governmental Activities $35,419,347 $3,034,696
Debt Obligation Interest
Rate
Final
Maturity
Balance June
30, 2025
Due Within
One Year
Subject to
Debt Limit
Business-Type Activities — Enterprise Fund Obligations
2016 Water Revenue
Refunding Bonds
2.0%–5.0% Aug 2034 $18,440,000 $1,680,000 No
2022A Water
Revenue Bonds (PFA)
5.0% Aug 2052 43,870,000 - No
2014 IBank
Installment Sale
Agreement
3.51% Aug 2044 8,802,644 310,951 No
Subtotal — Business-Type Activities $71,112,644 $1,990,951 TOTAL — TIER 1: CITY PRIMARY GOVERNMENT DEBT $106,531,991 $5,025,647 Tier 1 — Debt Service Requirements to Maturity
The following schedules present annual principal and interest requirements to maturity for each City primary government debt obligation per GASB Statement No. 38.
C. Description of the City’s Long-Term Debt Issues
2006 Pension Obligation Bonds — In June 2006, the City issued $39,566,056 of Series 2006 Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds to prepay the unfunded accrued actuarial liabilities owed to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) for the City’s Miscellaneous and Safety plans, and to the Contra Costa County Employees Retirement Association (CCCERA).
The bonds bear interest at rates between 5.850% and 6.115%, and are payable from any form of City taxation. As of June 30, 2025, the outstanding balance was $28,370,164. The bonds mature on July 1, 2036.
Fiscal Year
Ending
June 30
Principal Interest Total
2026 $2,855,000 $1,174,709 $4,029,709
2027 2,655,000 1,134,528 3,789,528
2028 2,745,000 1,099,960 3,844,960
2029 2,835,000 1,062,438 3,897,438
2030 2,935,000 1,021,813 3,956,813
2031–2035 16,875,000 3,603,013 20,478,013
2036 4,125,000 121,873 4,246,873
Total $35,025,000 $9,218,334 $44,243,334
2016 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds — In November 2016, the City issued $30,850,000 of Water Revenue Refunding Bonds to retire the outstanding 2008 Water Refunding Bonds and pay a swap termination fee. The bonds bear interest at rates between 2.0% and 5.0% (Tax-Exempt) and 0.87% (Taxable), payable solely from net water revenues of the Water Utility Enterprise Fund.
As of June 30, 2025, the outstanding balance was $18,440,000. The bonds mature on August 1, 2034.
Fiscal Year
Ending
June 30
Principal Interest Total
2026 $1,680,000 $737,250 $2,417,250
2027 1,745,000 651,625 2,396,625
2028 1,830,000 562,250 2,392,250
2029 1,895,000 469,125 2,364,125
2030 1,975,000 382,250 2,357,250
2031–2035 9,315,000 721,325 10,036,325
Total $18,440,000 $3,523,825 $21,963,825
2022A Water Revenue Bonds — In May 2022, the City issued $2,081,063 of Water Revenue Bonds to finance capital improvements to the City’s municipal water system. The bonds bear interest at 5.0%, payable solely from net water revenues of the Water Utility Enterprise Fund. No principal payments are required until August 2034; interest-only payments are made through FY2033–34. As of June 30, 2025, the outstanding balance was $43,870,000. The bonds mature in 2052.
Fiscal Year
Ending
June 30
Principal Interest Total
2026 $- $2,081,063 $2,081,063
2027 - 2,081,063 2,081,063
2028 - 2,081,063 2,081,063
2029 - 2,081,063 2,081,063
2030 - 2,081,063 2,081,063
2031–2035 525,000 10,392,188 10,917,188
2036–2040 7,415,000 9,385,188 16,800,188
2041–2045 9,540,000 7,308,956 16,848,956
2046–2050 15,290,000 4,636,925 19,926,925
2051–2052 11,100,000 851,000 11,951,000
Total $43,870,000 $42,979,572 $86,849,572
2014 I-Bank Installment Sale Agreement (Direct Loan) — In November 2014, the City entered into Installment Sale Agreement No. 14-12168 with the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (I-Bank) to finance modifications to the Pittsburg Water Treatment Plant and installation of approximately 9,100 feet of water transmission lines. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.51% per annum and is secured by a first lien on net water revenues of the Water Utility Enterprise Fund, on parity with the Water Revenue Bonds. Annual debt service is approximately $660,000. As of June 30, 2025, the outstanding balance was $8,802,644. The loan matures on August 1, 2044.
Fiscal Year
Ending June 30
Principal Interest Annual Fee Total
2026 $310,951 $303,516 $27,309 $641,776
2027 321,866 292,410 26,408 640,684
2028 333,163 280,914 25,475 639,552
2029 344,857 269,015 24,509 638,381
2030 356,962 256,698 23,510 637,170
2031–2035 1,981,779 1,083,061 101,286 3,166,126
2036–2040 2,354,869 703,423 70,479 3,128,771
2041–2045 2,798,197 252,315 33,873 3,084,385
Total $8,802,644 $3,441,352 $332,849 $12,576,845
PG&E Energy Efficient Loan (Direct Loan) — In April 2018, the City obtained a ten-year, interest-free (0%) loan from Pacific Gas and Electric in the amount of $213,294 to fund replacement of the City Hall Chiller with an energy-efficient system. The loan is repayable from general funds through monthly on-bill PG&E payments. No interest is charged. As of June 30, 2025, the outstanding balance was $60,440. The loan matures in 2028.
Year Ending
June 30
Principal Interest Total
2026 $21,329 - $21,329
2027 21,329 - 21,329
2028 17,782 - 17,782
Total $60,440 - $60,440
Building and Facility Leases — The City holds two active right-to-use building leases under GASB Statement No. 87. The Gateway-Domus lease (entered March 2006, 20-year term) requires monthly payments of $10,133 at an implicit rate of 3.7%; the outstanding balance at June 30, 2025 was $262,111. The PAC Art Centre lease (entered February 2020, 7-year term with 5- year extension option) requires monthly payments of $3,500–$3,605; the outstanding balance at June 30, 2025 was $71,796. Both leases mature by 2028.
Year Ending
June 30
Principal Interest Total
2026 $158,367 $9,693 $168,060
2027 145,328 3,835 149,163
2028 30,211 186 30,397
Total $333,906 $13,714 $347,620
Tier 1 — Legal Debt Limit and Remaining Capacity
California Government Code Section 43605 limits the City’s general obligation bonded debt to 15% of the assessed value of all taxable real and personal property. Only the 2006 Pension Obligation Bonds are subject to this limit; revenue bonds, enterprise fund debt, leases, and direct borrowings are excluded.
Computation of Legal Bonded Debt Margin - June 30, 2025 Secured Assessed Valuation (net of exempt property) $3,183,462,180 Bonded Debt Limit (15% of Assessed Value) 477,519,327
Total Bonded Debt (POBs + Water Bonds + 2022A Premium) 99,489,903 Less: Revenue Bonds (Water 2016 + Water 2022A + 2022A
Premium)
2016A Water Revenue Refunding Bonds 18,440,000
2022A Water Revenue Bonds 43,870,000
2022A Unamortized Bond Premium 2,154,903
Total Revenue Bonds (sum) (64,464,903)
Net Debt Applicable to Limit 35,025,000
Legal Bonded Debt Margin 442,494,327
Net Debt as % of Legal Debt Margin 7.92%
Ten-Year Legal Debt Limit Trend
Fiscal
Year
Debt Limit Net Debt
Applicable
Legal Debt
Margin
% of
Limit
2016 335,737,855 34,036,850 301,701,005 11.28%
2017 340,711,533 34,104,558 306,606,975 11.12%
2018 361,299,502 34,030,018 327,269,484 10.40%
2019 381,350,504 33,260,642 348,089,862 9.56%
2020 394,631,565 33,422,178 361,209,387 9.25%
2021 408,098,524 32,872,243 375,226,281 8.76%
2022 416,499,016 32,153,097 384,345,919 8.37%
2023 455,514,432 31,213,452 424,300,980 7.36%
2024 470,674,278 30,078,657 440,595,621 6.83%
2025 477,519,327 35,025,000 442,494,327 7.92%
As of June 30, 2025, the City’s net debt applicable to the legal limit represents 7.92% of the statutory ceiling, down from 11.28% a decade ago. The City retains $442.5 million in remaining legal debt capacity.
Tier 1 — Effect of Existing Debt on Current Operations
Debt service obligations directly affect the City’s budgetary flexibility by committing a portion of annual revenues to fixed principal and interest payments.
2.85%
POB debt service as % of City-wide
revenues (FY2024-25)
7.92%
Net debt as % of
statutory debt limit
(FY2024-25)
$442.1M
Remaining legal debt
capacity (92.67% of limit
unused)
Pension Obligation Bonds: Annual debt service on the 2006 POBs is approximately 2.85% of City-wide governmental revenues. The bonds amortize through July 2036; as the balance continues to decline each year, annual debt service requirements will decrease modestly, improving General Fund flexibility.
Water Utility Debt: The 2016 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds, IBank Agreement, and 2022A Water Revenue Bonds are payable solely from Water Utility Enterprise Fund revenues and do not affect the General Fund. Water charge revenues in FY2024-25 were $29.85 million, providing
1.77x coverage of parity debt service.
Total primary government debt outstanding declined from $105.5 million in FY2024 to $102.1 million in FY2025, a reduction of $3.4 million. Debt per capita fell from $1,360 to $1,323.
Tier 2: Successor Agency Debt (NOT a City of Pittsburg obligation) The Successor Agency to the Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency is a legally separate entity from the City. All Successor Agency debt is payable exclusively from Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) distributions allocated by Contra Costa County directly to the bond trustee.
The City does not receive, control, or guarantee these funds. This debt carries no City repayment obligation, does not count against the City’s statutory debt limit, and has no impact on the City’s budget or credit ratings. Disclosed here for transparency only.
Debt Obligation Interest
Rate
Final
Maturity
Balance
June 30, 2025
Due Within
One Year
Funding
Source
1999 RDA Tax Allocation
Bonds
4.1%–6.2%
/ 6.1%–
6.2%
(CABs)
Aug
2031
$36,920,287 $8,755,000 RPTTF
2006A Housing Set-Aside
Tax Allocation Bonds
5.12%–
5.31%
Aug
2037
6,420,000 380,000 RPTTF
2014 STAB Bonds 4.0%–5.0% Aug
2030
12,995,000 2,575,000 RPTTF
2016A Housing Set-Aside
Refunding Bonds
1.32%–
3.98%
Aug
2030
5,785,000 1,065,000 RPTTF
2016A Subordinate Tax
Allocation Refunding
Bonds
5.0% Sep
2030
76,970,000 13,890,000 RPTTF
Total — Tier 2 Successor Agency (not the city’s
obligation)
$139,090,287 $26,665,000
Tier 3: Special Assessment Debt and Conduit Debt (No City Obligation) These bonds were issued by the City in its capacity as a conduit issuer to finance public improvements within specific assessment districts.
Repayment is exclusively from property assessments or special taxes levied on property owners within each district. If property owners default, bondholders have recourse against those properties — not against the City or its revenues. This debt does not appear on the City’s financial statements, does not count against the City’s debt limit, and has no budget impact. It is disclosed here solely for transparency per California state reporting requirements.
Assessment District
/ Bond Issue
Beginning Balance
June 30, 2024
Retirements Ending Balance
June 30, 2025
City
Obligation
2001-03 Century
Plaza Auto Mall
Assessment District
Bonds
$2,140,000 $185,000 $1,955,000 None
2015 Vista Del Mar
A.D. Special Tax
Refunding Bonds
6,655,000 445,000 6,210,000 None
2022 Limited
Obligation Refunding
Improvement Bonds
3,164,598 549,323 2,615,275 None
Total – Tier 3 Special
Assessment Debt
(not the City’s
obligation)
$11,959,598 $1,179,323 $10,780,275
Summary — All Debt Associated with City of Pittsburg
The following table presents a consolidated view of all debt associated with the City, clearly distinguishing obligations by legal responsibility and budget impact.
Debt Category Balance June
30, 2025
City
Budget
Impact
Counts
Against
Debt Limit
Funding
Source
Tier 1: Primary Govt — Bonds (POBs) $35,025,000 Yes —
General
Fund
Yes City revenues
Tier 1: Primary Govt — Direct
Borrowings & Leases
394,347 Yes —
General
Fund
No City revenues
Tier 1: Primary Govt — Enterprise Fund
Debt
71,112,644 Enterprise
funds only
No Water
revenues
Tier 2: Successor Agency (not a City
obligation)
139,090,287 None No RPTTF only
Tier 3: Special Assessment (no City
obligation)
10,780,275 None No Assessments
only
Subtotal — Tier 1: City Primary
Government
106,531,991
TOTAL — All Debt (for reference
only)
$256,402,553
Credit Ratings
The following table presents current credit ratings for all rated City and Successor Agency debt obligations. Each bond issue may carry both an underlying rating — reflecting the City’s or Successor Agency’s own credit strength — and an insured (enhanced) rating reflecting the guarantee of a bond insurance policy. Bond insurance policies on certain obligations are provided by Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. (AGM). Investors should consider both underlying and insured ratings when evaluating each obligation.
Bond Issue S&P
Underlying
S&P
Insured
Moody's
Underlying
Fitch
Underlying
KBRA
Tier 1 — City Primary Government Obligations
2006 Taxable Pension Obligation
Bonds
AA- — Baa3 AA WR
2016A Refunding Water Revenue
Bonds
— — Aa3 — —
2022A Water Revenue Bonds
(PFA)
AA- AA — — —
Tier 2 — Successor Agency Obligations (NOT a City Obligation) 1999 RDA Tax Allocation Bonds A+ — — AA+ —
2006A Housing Set-Aside Tax
Allocation Bonds
A- — — AA —
2014 Successor Agency Tax
Allocation Refunding Bonds
A+ AA — AA+ AA+
2016A Housing Set-Aside Tax
Allocation Refunding Bonds
A- AA — AA —
2016A Subordinate Tax Allocation
Refunding Bonds
A- AA — A —
Rating Scale & Notes
S&P / Fitch / KBRA scale: AAA → AA+/AA/AA- → A+/A/A- → BBB+/BBB/BBB- (investment grade floor) Moody’s scale: Aaa → Aa1/Aa2/Aa3 → A1/A2/A3 → Baa1/Baa2/Baa3 (investment grade floor) Underlying: Rating reflecting the issuer’s own creditworthiness without bond insurance. Insured: Rating reflecting the guarantee of a bond insurance policy (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. / AGM). WR:
Rating withdrawn. —: Not rated by this agency.
Note: The 2006 POB Moody’s underlying rating of Baa3 reflects Moody’s more conservative methodology specifically applied to pension obligation bonds; the same bonds carry AA-/AA underlying from S&P and Fitch respectively. The 2016A Subordinate TABs carry insured AA from S&P vs. underlying A- (Fitch A), reflecting the credit enhancement provided by AGM bond insurance.
Source: Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system, https://emma.msrb.org/Search/Search.aspx, accessed May 1, 2026 at 10:28 AM; and City of Pittsburg FY2025-26 Annual Budget, Debt Service Section. Ratings reflect bond insurance provided by Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. (AGM) where applicable. Special Assessment District bonds carry no City repayment obligation and are excluded from this table.
Budgeted Debt Service — FY2025-26 and FY2026-27
The following table presents budgeted debt service expenditures for FY2025-26 and FY2026-27, including principal, interest, and other costs such as annual fees and trustee charges. This table reflects the actual cash impact on City funds in each budget year and differs from the GAAP-basis amortization schedules presented elsewhere in this section.
Debt Obligation Series Principal Interest Other
Costs
FY 2025–26
Total
FY 2026–27
Total
City — Pension Obligation Bonds
Taxable Pension
Funding Bond
(CalPERS CIBs +
CABs)
2006 $2,855,000 $1,174,709 $7,001 $4,036,710 $3,789,528 CCCERA 2006 355,482 305,151 - 660,633 660,633
Total Pension Obligation 3,210,482 1,479,860 7,001 4,697,343 4,450,161 City — Energy Efficiency Loan
PG&E Energy
Efficient Retrofit Loan
2018 21,329 - - 21,329 21,329
City — Leases 158,367 9,693 168,060 149,163
City — Revenue Bonds (Enterprise Fund)
2016A Water
Revenue Refunding
Bonds
2016 1,680,000 737,250 6,250 2,423,500 2,396,625
I-Bank Loan — Water
System Modification
2014 310,951 303,516 31,750 646,217 640,684
Water Revenue
Bonds, Series 2022A
2022 - 2,081,063 - 2,081,063 2,081,063
Total Revenue Bonds 1,990,951 3,121,829 38,000 5,150,780 5,118,372 Total City Debt Services 9,869,452 9,739,025
Successor Agency — NOT a City of Pittsburg obligation
1999 RDA Tax
Allocation Bonds
(CABs)
1999 1,822,266 6,932,734 - 8,755,000 8,750,000
Tax Allocation
Refunding Bonds
2014 2,575,000 585,375 5,000 3,165,375 3,158,375
Subordinate Tax
Allocation Refunding
Bonds
2016A 13,890,000 3,501,250 1,500 17,392,750 17,398,750
Housing Set-Aside
Tax Allocation Bonds
2006A 380,000 330,875 3,500 714,375 710,162
Housing Set-Aside
Tax Allocation
Refunding Bonds
2016A 1,065,000 233,997 5,000 1,303,997 1,301,204
Total Successor Agency Debt Services (not a City obligation) 31,331,497 31,318,491 Grand Total — City and Successor Agency Debt Services $41,369,009 $41,057,516
(1) FY2026-27 amounts derived from individual bond amortization schedules. The 1999 RDA Bonds FY2026-27 amount of $8,750,000 represents the total accreted face value payable on August 1, 2026, comprising par principal of $1,713,338 and accreted interest of $7,036,662. (2) Successor Agency debt service is funded exclusively from RPTTF distributions administered by Contra Costa County. The City of Pittsburg has no legal obligation to fund these payments from City revenues. Outstanding principal balances as of June 30, 2025 are presented in the Tier 1, 2, and 3 summary tables above.
Source: City of Pittsburg FY2025-26 Annual Budget, Debt Service Expenditure Requirements; City of Pittsburg FY2024-25 ACFR, Notes 8 and 15C. FY2026-27 budgeted amounts will be updated upon budget adoption.
Source: City of Pittsburg Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 (Notes 8, 9, and 15C; Statistical Section). Assessed valuation source: Contra Costa County Auditor-Controller Office.
Appendix
Major Revenue Sources
General Fund
The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Major revenue sources in the General Fund include property taxes, sales taxes, unrestricted revenues from the state (e.g., motor vehicle-in-lieu fees), county tipping fees, franchise fees, development service fees, police fines and fees, and recreation program fees. Expenditures consist of general government operating expenses, which include Human Resources, Finance, Police, Recreation, Public Works, and other services.
Business License Tax
The Business License Tax is an annual tax on local businesses, based upon either gross receipts (under progressive tax rates) or flat fees, depending on the type of business. Generally, retail businesses, service providers, and contractors pay based on gross receipts, while professionals (e.g. accountants, lawyers, dentists) pay under a flat fee. The rates are established by City Ordinance. The City currently has 4,501 active business licenses.
Community Benefit and Service Fee
The Community Benefit and Service Fee began in 2011. This fee, which started at $300,000 for the first year and increases by an annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation factor allows Pittsburg Disposal Service the exclusive right to collect refuse and recycling from all sectors in the community within the City of Pittsburg.
County Tipping Fees - Keller Canyon Mitigation
The Keller Canyon Mitigation was approved in 1994 as an Amendment to the Keller Canyon Landfill Land Use Permit. A Tipping Fee of $3.00 per ton is divided between Contra Costa County ($1.75 per ton) and the City ($1.25 per ton).
Community Development Service Fees
These revenues, which consist of design review charges, plan check services and building permits from the Engineering, Planning and Permit Center, are directly dependent upon the level of residential and commercial construction taking place in the community. These fees are generally collected during the planning and/or building permit process and are used to recover the costs of operating the City’s development service functions such as planning, engineering, and building.
Department Fees
The Police Department’s revenues are comprised of fines from citations, moving violations, abandoned vehicle abatements, administrative citations, Proposition 172, and the half-cent sales tax (Measure M) for public safety services. A smaller portion of the revenues are generated from fees for services, which include document and report reproduction, research services, court appearances, vehicle inspections, and fingerprinting services.
The Recreation Department’s revenues fees are charged to program participants, facility rentals, community events, Small World Park, youth activities, sports, aquatics, and recreation classes.
Franchise Fees
The City receives various Franchise fees. Comcast and AT&T U-Verse pay five percent of gross receipts on cable.
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) pays five percent on electricity and one percent gas fees for using City right-of-way for the transmission and distribution of electricity and natural gas.
Contra Costa Waste Service, Inc., the operator of the RCTS, pays a Franchise Fee for the general benefit and to support City services.
Pittsburg Disposal Service pays a Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Franchise Fee of twelve percent, for Refuse and Recycling.
Property Tax
Homes, businesses, and other taxable real and personal property are subject to a property tax rate of one percent of the assessed value. Assessed values are based on the 1975 property values with subsequent increases limited to two percent or CPI, whichever is lower. However, when there is a transfer of property ownership, or when a new property is constructed, the property is appraised at the current market value. The City of Pittsburg’s property tax revenue is approximately sixteen percent of the property tax rate on secured, unsecured, and unitary taxes that homeowners pay to the County. In recent years, the City has seen a gradual rise in property tax revenues attributable to increased property values as housing demand has picked up within the City, as well as the addition of several single-family and multi-family developments.
Property Transfer Tax
A transfer tax is imposed upon the transfer of real property. Pittsburg receives $0.55 per $1,000 of property value, which is the standard allowed under State law. Estimates are based on historical experience and market conditions
Sales Tax (Bradley-Burns)
Sales tax is levied on goods and services at the point of sale. The Sales tax rate in Pittsburg is
9.2%, of which the city receives one percent. With the favorable ruling in 2018 in the case of South Dakota vs. Wayfair, this allowed the State to charge tax on purchases made from out-of-state sellers. This has generated an additional sales tax revenue source for the City for years to come.
Consistent with trends throughout the State and Bay Area, sales tax revenue has declined, and minimal growth is projected for the next several years.
Measure M Local Sales Tax
In June 2012, the voters approved Measure P, a limited one-half percent (.5%) sale and use tax, to preserve essential services throughout the City. Measure P originally was to reduce to onequarter percent (0.25%) in FY 2017-18 and expire in FY 2022-23. In June 2016, the voters passed Measure M extending Measure P until June of 2035. Voters approved Measure M with 81.31% of the vote. Measure M will continue to fund youth and seniors, economic development, public safety, and public infrastructure within the City. Measure M requires a Citizens Oversight Committee to report on the revenues and expenditures of the measures.
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT or Hotel Tax)
On November 8, 2011, the voters of the City of Pittsburg approved Measure H, with over 77% of the vote, increasing the allowable TOT charge from 8% to 12%; at this same time, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 11-1353, amending Chapter 3.12 of the PMC. As adopted, PMC section
3.12.030 authorizes the City Council to set the TOT rate by resolution, up to a maximum of 12% of the rent charged. The current rate is 10 percent.
Internal Service Funds
The City has several Internal Services Funds that were created to account for the cost of services provided by one City department to another. Each department is allocated a cost based on a predetermined criterion. These funds include Building Maintenance, Fleet Maintenance, Information and Communications Fund, as well as Fringe Benefits and Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Funds.
Enterprise Funds
The City’s Enterprise Funds account for the acquisition, operation and maintenance of government facilities and services, which are entirely self-supported through use charges.
Marina
Pittsburg’s Marina is divided into three distinct harbors with a total of 649 berths; 274 are covered berths. The Marina generates its revenues from use of its berthing facilities and the sale of fuel.
Pittsburg Power and Island Energy Funds
The Pittsburg Power Company (PPC) is a municipal utility formed under the California Constitution. The PPC does business as Island Energy (IE) on Mare Island located in Vallejo, California. PPC develops revenue streams for the City of Pittsburg while retaining existing businesses and attracting new businesses. Island Energy distributes natural gas and electricity to the industries, schools, businesses, and residents on Mare Island. Island Energy’s focus is to provide reliable and less expensive energy to the existing residents of Mare Island, as well as to prepare for potential expansion of service as Mare Island is redeveloped over time.
Sewer Operating Fund
The City maintains the collection system that transports sewage to the treatment plant at Delta Diablo Sanitation District. The City charges water customers a fee to cover the cost to operate and maintain the system. The monthly sewer charge for a residential family is a flat fee. The nonsingle family and non-residential fees are based on a flat fee multiplied by their water consumption. The City’s sewer fees have remained the same since March 2014. Any excess annual revenues over operating expenses are utilized to maintain and update the infrastructure of the system through capital projects.
Waterfront Operations Fund
The Waterfront Operations Division manages the City’s sovereign tidelands that have been granted to the City from the State of California under Senate Bill 551, Chapter 422, Statutes of 2011. Granted sovereign tidelands, also referred to as Trust Lands, are held in trust for the people of California. The City is required to operate its granted Trust Lands in conformance with the California Constitution, granting statutes, the Public Trust Doctrine, and the Trust Lands Use Plan adopted by the City on April 3, 2017 and the California State Lands Commission on June 22, 2017 in accordance with Senate Bill 551. One mechanism the City uses to manage uses within the Trust Lands is leasing, which limit uses to those allowed by statute, and generate revenue that is reinvested into the City’s Trust Lands.
Water Treatment Plant and Operations Fund
The City operates and maintains its own water treatment plant. The City charges water customers fees for water usage to cover the cost to procure water as well as operate and maintain the City’s water system. Currently, the City provides water service to approximately 19,500 customers of which 92% or 17,940 of these accounts are for residential locations. Any excess annual revenues over operating expenses are utilized to maintain and update the infrastructure of the system through capital projects. Any excess annual revenues over operating expenses are utilized to maintain and update the infrastructure of the system through capital projects.
Water and Sewer Facility Reserve Charge Funds
A Facility Reserve Charge (FRC) or development impact mitigation fee is a charge to pay for public facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed and to serve new development, or to pay for new facilities that will be of benefit to the person or property being charged (new development or upgrades to existing meter capacity). FRCs are intended to recover a portion of the City’s Capital Improvement Program costs and utility rate payers’ prior investment in capital facilities that support land development through utility system expansion prior to new development.
The City has separate FRCs for both the water and sewer utilities. However, the development of FRC unit costs for the water and sewer utilities is very similar and addresses the same fundamental concerns. The payment of appropriate FRCs should:
1. Recoup the cost of new utility facilities that are necessary to provide utility services to new development, or
2. Recoup the value of utility facilities that have been previously provided for by ratepayer investment through construction, maintenance and rehabilitation and are now available for use by new developments.
The City has established separate funds to account for the water and sewer facility reserve charges.
Special Revenue Funds
Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes.
Lighting and Landscape Districts (LLADs)
LLADs are established within the City to fund services and improvements in areas within the City.
These services include:
Park maintenance, including park-related structures (restrooms, park facilities) Street median and right-of-way landscaping maintenance Street tree maintenance
Sidewalk repair related to street tree damage only
Streetlight energy maintenance and replacement costs
Gas Tax Funds
Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)
State imposed per-gallon excise tax on gasoline and diesel fuel. The use of gas tax funds is restricted to street expenditures by State and Federal legislation.
SB-1 Gas Tax - Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Enacted under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 also known as SB-1, this $0.12 per gallon tax on gasoline and $0.20 per gallon tax on diesel fuel provides funding to be used for road maintenance and rehabilitation projects and contains specific accountability and reporting requirements.
Housing Authority Fund
The Federal Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) provides housing vouchers to eligible low-income families, the elderly, and the disabled allowing them to afford decent, safe, and sanitary housing.
HUD also provides housing vouchers to homeless veterans participating in the HUD Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) Program. The HUD-VASH program combines the HUD
Housing Choice Voucher rental assistance for homeless veterans with case management and clinical services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) at its medical centers in the community. The City’s Housing Authority manages the HUD system and is reimbursed for vouchers issued by HUD.
Kirker Creek Drainage Fund
The City collects fees from developers of properties that are within the Kirker Creek Watershed Drainage Area. These fees are deposited into a separate special revenue fund to be expended solely for land acquisition, construction, engineering, administration, repair maintenance and operating of planned drainage facilities within the drainage area, or to reduce the principal or interest of any bonded indebtedness of the drainage area.
Measure J Fund
In 1988, the Contra Costa County voters approved a one-half cent sales tax called Measure C for the purpose of funding transportation projects within the County. The imposition of the sales tax expired March 31, 2009, and was replaced with Measure J. This measure allocates sales tax to cities within the County based on population and road mileage. These funds may be used only for transportation and transit related projects.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) NPDES is a joint effort of the Planning, Engineering, and Public Works departments through the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program. Since 1993, the City has worked with Contra Costa County, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and 15 other cities in the county to meet federal mandates for minimizing pollutants in storm water runoff. Revenues are being used to fund its pro-data share of the Clean Water Program’s staffing and overhead costs as well as local level activities necessary to comply with provisions of the joint Municipal regional Permit (MRP). Contra Costa County collects a property assessment of $30 per Equivalent Runoff Unit each year on behalf of the City to fund its clean water activities.
Community Facilities Districts (CFDs)
CFDs are special tax districts created to provide funding for services within the community. These tax revenues are levied and collected on property tax bills and are used for parks ground care, development of public facilities, and police services. Currently the City CFDs include:
Park Maintenance Community Facility District (CFD 2007-1) Railroad Avenue Specific Plan Area Community Facilities District (CFD 2014-1) San Marco Community Facilities District (CFD 2004-1)
Vista Del Mar Community Facilities District (CFD 2005-2) Public Safety Community Facilities District (CFD 2005-1) Public, Education & Government Fees (PEG)
The California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) administers certain provisions of the state franchises under the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act (DIVCA). Some areas of DIVCA are administered by the City, specifically, the collection of franchise fees, PEG issuance, and enforcement of customer service standards. Each state franchise holder shall remit to the City a fee to support PEG channel facilities in the amount of one percent of the gross revenues of the state franchise holder. Revenues collected shall be only expended for the purpose of supporting PEG channel facilities.
Park Dedication Fee Fund
The City collects Park Dedication Fees in lieu of land from developers of properties and deposits these monies in this separate special revenue fund. These funds may be used for the design, development and construction of new parks or the expansion and rehabilitation of existing parks within the City.
Southwest Pittsburg Geological Hazard Abatement District (GHAD) II On February 20, 2001, the City Council created the GHAD II District as a separate legal entity from the City to provide maintenance of slopes in the open space areas of Southwest Pittsburg.
Funding for the GHAD is provided through assessment fees levied on the property taxes of the homes built in the hillside areas. This fund centralizes the accounting for the revenues and expenses associated with GHAD as required by law.
Solid Waste Fund
Under the Recycling Center and Transfer Stations (RCTS) operating agreement with the Contra Costa Waste Service, Inc. (CCWS), the City receives a Recycling and Inspection Fee of a flat rate ($1.91/ton effective October 2018) plus annual CPI adjustment on all solid waste and recycled material accepted at the transfer station. Solid Waste Management creates and implements programs and services for schools, City offices, businesses, and the community by promoting waste prevention, reuse and recycling to meet state mandates like the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, Mandatory Commercial Recycling and Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling, and the Short Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy.
Private-Purpose Trust Fund
Successor Agency to the Former Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency - Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund
AB1X 26, adopted in June 2011, required redevelopment agencies to be dissolved and replaced with Successor Agencies responsible for winding down the affairs of the redevelopment agencies including disposing of their assets. The City is the Successor Agency to the former Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency. Successor Agencies must adopt Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS) annually that identify enforceable obligations consisting of bonds, loans, payments required by governments (except pass- through payments), court judgments and settlements, legal contracts and agreements and contracts necessary for continued administration.
Budget Guide
BUDGET PROCESS
The budget process begins in December and culminates seven months later with the adoption of the Annual Budget in June.
Mid-Year Budget Review
Work begins in December of each year on the mid-year review. The mid-year review is a detailed analysis of all City revenues and expenditures during the current fiscal year. The midyear review reports actual and estimated balances published and distributed to the City Council, staff, and the general public for consideration during the month of February each year.
The mid-year financial analysis provides the financial starting point for the subsequent year's Operating Budget.
Update General Fund 20-Year Forecast
Preparing accurate General Fund revenue and expenditure forecasts is an important part of the budget process. The update of the 20-year forecast of the General Fund begins during the mid-year budget review. The forecast is revised as necessary based on different budgeting scenarios and as more accurate revenue and expenditure data is available during the budget preparation process. The update and revisions occur again once year-end financial statements have been prepared.
Revenue Estimates
Revenue estimates are developed each year using the actual revenues realized from the prior fiscal year and adjusted upwards or downwards based on whether staff has information to suggest such an adjustment is necessary. For example, property taxes are adjusted based on the most recent assessed valuation reports that the City receives from the County. Similarly, the City's sales tax advisor develops sales tax revenue projections based on trends in various sales categories. Rate-based revenues such as those associated with water, sewer, and electric services are based on the current rates, recent consumption patterns, and/or anticipated changes to water supply due to rainfall patterns.
Budget Preparations
Budget packets are distributed by the Finance Department to each City department in early February. Departments submit preliminary budget requests to the Finance Department in February/March. During this time all revenue sources are projected. Finance staff reviews departmental requests and compiles the Preliminary Budget. The requested budgets are then presented to Senior Management and the City Manager for review and approval.
Recommendations from review sessions are incorporated into the proposed operating budget.
The Finance Subcommittee reviews, makes revisions as necessary, to the proposed operating budget. After review by the Finance Subcommittee, the City Council holds Public Workshops to obtain input from the public. After giving due consideration to the public input, the City Council finalizes and adopts the budget by June 30th.
5-Year Capital Improvement Program
The City of Pittsburg 5-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning instrument that identifies the construction of new facilities and infrastructure, and for the expansion, rehabilitation, or replacement of existing City-owned assets. Each year a 5-year CIP is developed in conjunction with the operating budget and reflects changing priorities and funding availability. The 5-Year CIP is presented for the Community Advisory Commission and Planning Commission prior to seeking City Council approval.
Budget Amendments
All changes to the Operating Budget throughout the year require budget amendments, which require the following levels of governing body approval:
Items Requiring Council or Agency Action
Appropriation of fund balance revenues.
New inter-fund loans or advances.
Creation of new capital projects.
Transactions that increase total fund appropriations.
Items Delegated to Department Heads
Budget modifications which do not increase total fund budget Allocation of departmental appropriations to line items except for salary and benefit appropriations.
Changes which exceed current funds disbursement authorizations must be approved by the City Manager/Executive Director. These changes cannot increase the department budget.
Quick-Reference: Budget Amendment Approval Authority
Amendment Action Approving
Authority
Dollar
Threshold
May Increase Total
Fund Budget?
New inter-fund loan or advance City Council /
Agency
Any amount YES
Creation of a new capital
project
City Council /
Agency
Any amount YES
Any transaction increasing total
fund budget
City Council /
Agency
Any amount YES
Reallocation of line items
within GF department, non-GF
Fund (non-salary/benefit)
Department
Head
Any amount NO
Budget modification — within
department
Department
Head
≤ $5,000 NO
Budget modification — among
departments
City Manager /
Exec. Director
Any amount NO
Salary & benefits appropriation
adjustments and reallocations
among expenditure categories.
City Manager /
Exec. Director
Any amount NO
Basis of Budgeting
Governmental Funds include the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds and Capital Project Funds. The Governmental Funds and the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency Funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Modified accrual accounting recognizes revenues when they become available and measurable and, with a few exceptions, recognizes expenditures when liabilities are incurred. This system divides available funds into separate entities within the organization to ensure that the money is being spent where it was intended.
Proprietary funds include Enterprise Funds and Internal Service Funds. These funds are accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. Accrual basis of accounting measures the performance and position of the City by recognizing economic events regardless of when cash transactions occur. The general idea is that economic events are recognized by matching revenues to expenses (the matching principle) at the time in which the transaction occurs rather than when payment is made (or received).
The budgetary process is based upon accounting for certain transactions on a basis other than generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP basis). The major difference between the budgetary basis and GAAP basis is that year end encumbrances are recognized as the equivalent of expenditures on the budgetary basis in governmental funds, while encumbered amounts are not recognized as expenditures on the GAAP basis. Additionally, certain items such as depreciation expense and fair market value adjustments are recognized on the GAAP basis but not for budget purposes.
FY 2026-27 Budget Development Calendar
Year / Month Key Activities Responsible
Party
2025
December 2025 Request for mid-year estimates sent by
Finance to all City departments
Finance
Department → All
Departments
2026
February 2026 Department Mid-Year Estimates Due to
Finance from all City departments
All Departments
→ Finance
Mid-year report published and distributed to
City Council, staff, and public
Mid-year financial analysis provides starting
point for subsequent year's Operating Budget
20-year forecast update begins
Finance
Department
March 2026 Finalize Mid-year Estimates (Finance)
Annual Budget Kick-off Meeting (Finance &
All Departments)
Operating Budget Templates and Other
Forms Due to Finance from All Departments
Staff Allocations Due to Finance
Strategic Plan Adopted by City Council FY
2026-27
Finance / HR / All
Depts / City
Manager / Council
April 2026 Finance presents FY 2025-26 Mid-Year
Budget Review to City Council
Finance Subcommittee reviews FY 2026-27
Proposed Budget
Internal Budget Reviews and Meetings
(Finance & All Departments)
Finance →
Council / Finance
Subcommittee / All
Departments
May 2026 Internal Budget Reviews and Meetings
(Finance & All Departments)
City Council Budget Workshop (public
participation)
Senior Executive Team Budget Review (City
Manager)
Measure M Committee Review
Finance / City
Manager / Council
/ Public
June 2026 City Council adopts Appropriations Limit
Finance updates General Fund 20-year
Projections
City Council adopts Budget (deadline: June
30)
Council / Finance
(Adopted June 15,
2026)
Financial Policies and Procedures
The City of Pittsburg has established Financial Policies and Procedures to provide guidance towards the City’s fiscal stability as well as prudent and accountable management of the City’s funds. The City’s Financial Policies and Procedures are summarized below, and their entirety can be found on the City’s website at https://www.pittsburgca.gov/services/finance/financial-policies.
Balanced Budget
The City will pay for all current non-capital expenditures with current revenues. The City will avoid budgetary procedures that balance current expenditures at the expense of meeting future years’ expenses such as postponing expenditures or accruing future years’ revenues.
Capital Improvement Plans
The City will develop 5-year Capital Improvement Plans that will be updated annually.
The City will develop annual capital budgets based on the 5-year Capital Improvement Plans.
The City will coordinate the capital budget with the operating budget such that future operating costs associated with new capital improvements will be included in financial forecasts.
The City will identify estimated costs and potential funding sources for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to City Council for approval.
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR)
The City will prepare the ACFR consistent with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and Governmental Finance Officers Association (GFOA) standards and will contract with an independent audit firm to audit the ACFR.
Expenditure Controls
The City has various expenditure controls in place to ensure the City does not over-expend its budget including: (1) position requisition must be in the budget and approved by the City Manager, (2) encumbrance requests for purchases or contracts reviewed and approved by the department directors to ensure there are adequate funds, and (3) mid-year budget reviews to forecast expenses and revenues that identifies any potential shortfalls.
Financial Plans
The City will annually prepare 5-year or more Forecasts for the City’s General Fund and Housing Authority Fund that will include realistic revenue and expenditure projections.
Fund Balance
Fund balance is the difference between a fund's assets and liabilities at the close of the prior fiscal year. For budgeting purposes, only the unassigned portion is available for appropriation — other portions may be restricted by law, grant requirements, or Council policy.
The budget year estimated fund balance includes prior fiscal year actual fund balance plus estimated revenues minus the expenditure budget.
Revenue
The City will try to maintain diversified and stable revenues to shelter it from unforeseeable shortrun fluctuations in any revenue stream.
The City will estimate its annual revenues by an objective, analytical process wherever practical.
The City will update revenue projections annually.
The City will calculate the costs associated with user fees to ensure the fees are cost covering.
Capital Assets Policy
The policy defines capital assets as tangible items to be used over a period of time greater than three years and having a value greater than or equal to $5,000. In addition, the policy classifies assets as either land, buildings, improvements other than buildings or equipment and identifies method of depreciation thereof.
Debt Policy
The City of Pittsburg manages its debt obligations in accordance with its Debt Management Policy, which establishes guidelines for the issuance, administration, and retirement of all City debt. The Policy limits general obligation debt to the statutory maximum of 3.75% of assessed valuation at full cash value, as defined under California Government Code Section 43605. Revenue bonds issued for enterprise fund purposes must be supported by pledged system revenues and must maintain minimum debt service coverage consistent with applicable bond covenants. The City does not issue debt to fund operating expenditures.
As of July 1, 2025, the City’s total outstanding debt applicable to the statutory limit is within the legal debt margin of $118 million. Debt service requirements are funded through allocated charges, enterprise fund revenues, tax increment, and special assessment collections — each matched to the obligation they support — ensuring that debt service does not compete with General Fund operating priorities.
Fiscal Sustainability Policy
The goal of the Fiscal Sustainability Policy is to ensure the City has sufficient reserves to cover expenses in the event of an emergency and that it uses one-time revenues for one-time expenses.
Specifically, the Fiscal Sustainability Policy established:
• Minimum unappropriated reserve balance at 30% of operating expenses for the City’s General Fund, Internal Services Funds, and Enterprise Funds to be used only for emergencies such as natural disasters;
• A Budget Stabilization Fund to be used to help absorb costs during an economic downturn and/or budget shortfall with a minimum balance equal to $2.0 million or 5% of the General Fund operating expenses, whichever is greater, and a maximum balance of $7.5 million or 25% of the General Fund operating expenses;
• An Infrastructure Repair and Replacement Fund and Other Post-employment Benefits (OPEB) Fund that receives surplus Budget Stabilization Fund monies; and • Required a 4/5 vote of the City Council for appropriation of reserves or to vary the reserve levels.
The Ordinance also requires the City to deposit one-time General Fund revenues, projected recurring revenues that exceed 10% or more from the previous fiscal year, and fiscal year-end General Fund surpluses into the Budget Stabilization Fund.
Grant Policy
The City has established a grant policy that provides an overall framework for the use and management of grant resources including identifying roles and responsibilities for managing the City’s grants and compliance with Single Audit Act requirements.
Interfund Transfer Policy
The policy ensures that procedures related to the administration and accounting for Interfund transactions are documented, communicated, clearly understood, and consistently applied.
Investment Policy
Provides guidelines for the prudent investment of the City’s idle funds that optimizes returns while protecting the principal and providing sufficient liquidity. Identifies eligible investments that include federal securities, Certificates of Deposit (CDs), medium term private security notes of highly rated companies, and Money Market Funds. Delegates investment decision to the Director of Finance with oversight provided by the City Treasurer and City Manager.
Purchasing Policies
Delegates purchasing authority to the City Manager for goods and services valued at $75,000 or below and to Senior Executive staff for those valued at $50,000 or below. Identifies formal and informal bidding procedures based on dollar amount. Allows informal bidding for construction services of less than $175,000 and requires formal bidding for those greater than $175,000.
Fund Reserves Policy
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
An Ordinance of the City of Pittsburg Amending )
Chapter 3.26.030 of the Pittsburg Municipal )
Code Relating to Fiscal Sustainability and )
Reserve Funds )
ORDINANCE NO. 18-1455
The City Council of the City of Pittsburg DOES ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals.
A. In order to ensure the fiscal sustainability of the City, the City desires to protect its revenues and ensure proper fiscal responsibility; and
B. The City desires to maintain a reserve funds in case of an emergency; and C. The City desires to maintain a minimum balance in the City’s Budget Stabilization Fund; and
D. By ensuring minimum funding levels for reserve funds, the City desires to minimize the need to rely on one-time measures and funding sources to balance its budget, while protecting the City from major deficits and over spending.
SECTION 2. Adding Chapter 3.26 "Fiscal Sustainability and Reserve Funds" to Title 3 "Revenue and Finance" of the Pittsburg Municipal Code
Title 3 "Revenue and Finance" of the Pittsburg Municipal Code is hereby amended to include Chapter 3.26 "Fiscal Sustainability and Reserve Funds," which shall read as follows:
Section 3.26.010 Purpose and Definitions.
A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish policies and procedures to ensure the City maintains unappropriated fund balances, “Reserves” in the City’s funds.
B. For purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
1. “City’s Operating Expenses” shall mean the City’s General Fund operating expenses of the City as set forth in the City’s annual budget which generally includes staff costs and operating expenses of the City and excludes the capital project appropriations.
2. “One-time Revenues” shall mean those revenues that the City receives on a one-time or non-regular basis. For example, such revenues may include, but are not limited to, proceeds from the sale of surplus land, one-time unexpected sales tax allocations associated with capital improvements from local retailers, grants, lump sum payments of project fees, non-reoccurring sales tax of fee revenue, etc.
3. “Unappropriated Reserves” shall mean unappropriated operating revenues excluding capital project and program appropriations which originate from funding sources that are restricted to projects or programs.
Section 3.26.020 General Fund Account
There is established a “General Fund” into which all sums of money collected by the City for any purpose whatsoever shall be deposited, unless otherwise provided by ordinance or resolution directing the deposit into a specific fund other than the General Fund.
Section 3.26.030 General Fund Reserves
A. There is established within the General Fund, a “General Fund Reserve”, which shall be used for emergencies, including for example, natural disasters and costs associated with such natural disasters.
B. At each and every budget cycle, commencing with FY 2013-14, and every year thereafter, money from the General Fund shall be unappropriated, and shall be deposited into the General Fund Reserve. The minimum funding level within the General Fund Reserve shall be thirty percent (30%) of the City’s General Fund Operating Expenses. However, the City Council shall, on a best efforts basis, take such steps as necessary to achieve the minimum General Fund Reserve level during the budget process each year through fiscal year 2017/18. Afterward, the minimum funding levels will become mandatory as defined by this ordinance.
C. The thirty percent (30%) minimum funding level within the General Fund Reserve of the City’s General Fund Operating Expenses shall consist of the following and be restricted as per the City’s policy:
• A Reserve for Economic Uncertainty (20% of the 30% minimum funding level within the General Fund Reserve) – funds designated to mitigate periodic revenue shortfalls due to downturn in economic cycles, thereby avoiding the need for servicelevel reductions within the fiscal year, and • An Emergency Reserve (10% of the 30% minimum funding level within the General Fund Reserve) – funds designated to mitigate costs of unforeseeable emergencies and natural disasters.
The composure of the reserves shall consist of:
1. A minimum of two-thirds of the 30% (i.e., 20%) shall be held in cash and liquid investments consistent with the City’s Investment Policy; and
2. An amount not to exceed one-third of the 30% (i.e., up to 10%) may be held in real property owned and designated by the City, where such real property has an appraised value of at least 125% of the dollar amount which the real property constitutes within the City’s General Fund Reserve.
D. Before the City sells, or otherwise encumbers in such a manner as to significantly impair the value of, any real property referenced in Section C.2 above, the City shall comply with Section E hereof and:
1. Identify replacement real property prior to the sale or encumbrance of the current designated property, provided that the City Council approves such replacement;
2. Direct proceeds from the sale or encumbrance of the current designated property into the General Fund Reserve to maintain the minimum required funding;
3. Increase the amount held in cash or liquid investments to maintain the minimum required funding; or
4. Take any combination of the above actions, such that the City maintains the minimum required funding.
5. Should the sale of any property result in the General Fund Reserve balance being greater than the 30% minimum funding level, the proceeds in excess of the 30% minimum funding level will be deposited into the Budget Stabilization Fund or handled in accordance with the requirements of the Ordinance.
E. To designate real property as being held to satisfy the City’s minimum General Fund Reserve requirement under Section C.2 above, the City shall identify the property by APN and/or address by a resolution adopted at a public hearing at a duly noticed regular City Council meeting. The City may remove the real property from this designation only by a subsequent resolution adopted at a public hearing at a duly noticed regular City Council meeting.
Section 3.26.040 Budget Stabilization Fund
A. There is established a “Budget Stabilization Fund” which shall provide the City a cushion to help absorb costs during economic downturns and/or budget shortfalls.
B. The target minimum funding level within the Budget Stabilization Fund shall be no less than $2.0 million dollars or five percent (5%) of the City’s General Fund Operating Expenses, whichever is greater. The City Council shall, on a best efforts basis, take such steps as necessary to meet the minimum funding level during the budget process each year.
C. The target maximum funding level for the Budget Stabilization Fund shall be no more than $7.5 million dollars or twenty-five percent (25%) of the annual City’s General Fund Operating Expenses, whichever is greater.
D. Additional Deposits into the Budget Stabilization Fund shall include:
1. One-time General Fund Revenues and/or projected recurring revenues that exceed ten percent (10%) or more from the previous fiscal year shall be deposited into the Budget Stabilization Fund.
2. Fiscal year-end General Fund surpluses shall also be deposited into the Budget Stabilization Fund.
E. Appropriations from the Budget Stabilization Fund require a majority vote of the City Council and may be made in order to balance the General Fund budget.
Section 3.26.050 Infrastructure Repair and Replacement Fund A. There is established an “Infrastructure Repair and Replacement Fund” which shall provide funding for additional repairs and capital improvements projects related to the City’s infrastructure including streets, roads, parking lots, and storm drains.
B. Once the Budget Stabilization Fund reaches the maximum funding level, seventy five percent (75%) of the available, excess revenues that would normally be placed into the Budget Stabilization Fund shall be deposited into the Infrastructure Repair and Replacement Fund.
C. Appropriations from the Infrastructure Repair and Replacement Fund shall require a majority vote of the City Council.
Section 3.26.060 Other Post-employment Benefits (OPEB) Fund A. There is established an “Other Post-employment Benefits (“OPEB”) Fund” which shall be available to provide funding to reduce the City’s General Fund’s portion of unfunded OPEB liabilities, including for example, retiree health benefits.
B. Once the Budget Stabilization Fund reaches the maximum funding level, twenty five percent (25%) of the available, excess revenues that would normally be placed into the Budget Stabilization Fund shall be deposited into the OPEB Fund.
C. Appropriations from the OPEB Fund shall require a majority vote of the City Council.
Section 3.26.070 Internal Service Fund Reserves
A. The City maintains the following Internal Service Funds which provides funding to allocate costs for services provided to all City departments:
1. Information and Communication Systems
2. Fleet Maintenance
3. Building Maintenance
4. Fringe Benefits
5. Liability Insurance
B. It is established within each of these Internal Services Funds an Unappropriated Reserve which shall be used for emergencies, including for example, natural disasters and costs associated with such natural disasters. At each and every budget cycle, commencing with FY 2013-14, and every year thereafter, the unappropriated reserve level within Internal Services Funds shall be thirty percent (30%) of the Internal Services Funds’ annual budget excluding capital project and equipment appropriations. However, the City Council shall, on a best efforts basis, take such steps as necessary to achieve the minimum Internal Services Funds’ Reserve levels during the budget process each year through fiscal year 2017/18.
Afterward, the minimum funding levels will become mandatory as defined by this ordinance.
The thirty percent (30%) reserve level may be exceeded.
Section 3.26.080 Enterprise Fund Reserves
A. The City maintains the following enterprise funds for enterprise operations:
1. Water
2. Sewer
3. Waterfront Operations
4. Marina
B. It is established within each of these Enterprise Funds an Unappropriated Reserve which shall be used for emergencies, including for example, natural disasters and costs associated with such natural disasters. At each and every budget cycle, commencing with FY 2013-14, and every year thereafter, the target unappropriated reserve level within each Enterprise Fund Reserves shall be thirty percent (30%) of each Enterprise Fund’s fiscal year operating expenses, excluding capital project appropriations. However, the City Council shall, on a best efforts basis, take such steps as necessary to achieve the minimum Enterprise Funds’ Reserve levels during the budget process each year through fiscal year
2017/18. Afterward, the minimum funding levels will become mandatory as defined by this ordinance. The thirty percent (30%) reserve level may be exceeded.
Section 3.26.090 Council Action Required
Except as otherwise stated in this Chapter, any variance from the policies established within this Ordinance, shall require adoption of a City Council resolution by a 4/5 vote of the City Council. The Council resolution shall set forth the following:
A. A statement of findings supporting the appropriation of reserves or temporary modification of funding levels required by this ordinance; and
B. A plan for replenishing the reserves within a reasonable time period when the appropriation causes a reserve to fall below minimum funding levels; and C. A description of the circumstances or event constituting an emergency.
SECTION 3. Effective Date
This ordinance shall be in full force and effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 4. Publication
The City Clerk shall either (a) have this ordinance published once within 15 days after adoption in a newspaper of general circulation or (b) have a summary of the ordinance published twice in a newspaper of general circulation, once 5 days before its adoption and again 20 days after adoption.
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Pittsburg held on September 17, 2018 and was adopted and ordered published at a meeting of the City Council held on October 1, 2018 by the following vote:
AYES: Banales, Craft, Evola, Killings
NOES: None
ABSTAINED: None
ABSENT: Longmire
ATTEST: Dwaine “Pete” Longmire, Mayor
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
Gann Limit
This is a place holder for the FY 2026-27 Adopted Gann Limit Resolution
Miscellaneous Statistics
Date of Incorporation June 22, 1903
Form of Government Council/Manager
Area 20.7 sq. miles
Number of Agency/Liaison/Subcommittee Assignments 21
Utility Accounts 19,745 Businesses in the City: Storefronts 955 Active/Issued Business Licenses 4,203 Response to Service Requests 2,000 Businesses in the City: Home Occupations 955
Enrollees in Recreation Programs 2,228 Reservable Picnic Areas 23 Athletic Fields Maintained 13 Playgrounds Maintained 27 Restroom Facilities Maintained 43 Dog Parks 2
Pools Maintained 2 Sponsored Public Performances/Events 8 Neighborhood & Community Parks 32 Sponsored Cultural Celebrations 10 Total Acres of Parks Landscape Maintained 190 Sponsored Public Festivals 3 Total Acres of Greenbelts Maintained 16.5
Building Permits Issued 1,826 Building Inspections Performed 4,500 Code Enforcement Cases Processed 853
Stations 1 Calls for Service 28,117
Sworn Personnel 88
Miles of Streets 175 Water Service Connections** 19,593 Miles of On-Street Bike Lanes 29.8 Gallons of Surface Water Pumped** 2.61B gal Miles of Off-Street Bike Paths 13.8 Storage Tank Capacity** 19.3M gal Street & Pathway Lights 4,543 Miles of Water Mains** 235 Traffic Signalized Intersections 65 Gallons of Ground Water Pumped 310.98M Water Meters Read Every Month 19,737
Fire Hydrants 2,005
Encroachment Permits 219
Active Capital Improvement Projects 60 Fleet Vehicles & Equipment Maintained 282 Storm Drainage Solid Waste
Miles of Storm Drainage Line 109 Trash/Refuse Landfilled (tons/year) 78,854 Stormwater Detention Basins & Ponds 20 Recyclables Processed (tons/year) 43,344 Wastewater
City Buildings Maintained 23 Miles of Sewer Mains 176
Square Footage – City Buildings 213,108 Sewer Lift Stations 2 * Statistics are as of May 2026 unless noted otherwise
** FY 2024-25 ACFR
Facilities
Water
Engineering
Fleet
General
Police
Public Works
City Manager's Office
Parks and Recreation
Community & Economic Development
Finance and Information Systems
Streets
Population and Economics
10-Year Trend
Fiscal
Year Population Unrate Population Unrate Population Unrate 2016 69,424 5.8% 1,135,127 5.90% 39,250,017 6.50%
2017 70,679 5.0% 1,147,439 5.20% 39,536,653 5.90%
2018 72,141 3.7% 1,150,215 4.60% 39,557,045 5.50%
2019 72,437 3.7% 1,153,526 4.00% 39,512,223 5.10%
2020 72,588 16.8% 1,147,788 5.50% 39,346,023 6.20%
2021 76,416 8.8% 1,161,413 7.70% 39,237,836 8.30%
2022 76,544 3.9% 1,156,966 5.10% 39,029,342 5.30%
2023 77,572 4.3% 1,155,025 5.60% 38,965,193 5.50%
2024 75,083 4.1% 1,169,534 4.50% 39,421,000 5.30%
2025 77,131 4.1% 1,155,001 4.80% 39,529,000 5.30%
Population and Unemployment Rate
City County State
- 20,000.00 40,000.00 60,000.00 80,000.00 100,000.00 120,000.00 2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Median Household Income
City County State
Principal Employers
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
2024-25
Percentage Percentage
Number of of Total City Number of of Total City
Employer Employees Rank Employment Employees Rank Employment Pittsburg Unified School District* 1,290 1 3.2% 1,274 1 3.4% Los Medanos Community College* 2 0.0% 719 2 1.9%
City of Pittsburg* 324 3 0.8% 255 5 0.7%
Ramar Foods* 234 4 0.6% 187 7 0.5%
Walmart** 217 5 0.5% 250 6 0.7%
WinCo Foods** 168 6 0.4% 145 10 -
Home Depot** 163 7 0.4% - -
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.** 129 8
Corteva** 125 9 0.3% 370 4 1.0%
Safeway** 125 10 0.3% - -
Subtotal 2,775 6.9% 3,200 7.9%
Employees in the City of Pittsburg 40,388 *** 37,098 **
Source: *Phone Survey by City Staff
***2015-16 data from CAFR
2015-16 ***
***DP03 | Select Economic Characteristics: 2024 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates (U.S. Census) https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2024.DP03?q=workforce+in+Pittsburg+Ca
Assessed and Estimated Value of Taxable Property
10-Year Trend
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
Secured Tax Roll NET Total
Fiscal Personal Unsecured GROSS LESS: Exemptions Assessed Direct Year Land Improvements Property Tax Roll Tax Roll HOPTR Others Valuation Tax Rate 2016 1,596,856,457 4,088,152,986 28,100,163 905,755,131 6,618,864,737 57,212,685 195,920,004 6,365,732,048 0.15020 2017 1,734,578,352 4,271,018,852 31,382,377 763,128,074 6,800,107,655 56,350,900 203,066,563 6,540,690,192 0.15142 2018 1,912,263,271 4,316,648,943 30,152,799 789,812,811 7,048,877,824 55,968,158 206,618,682 6,786,290,984 0.15305 2019 2,097,264,749 4,752,331,104 29,396,436 808,915,163 7,687,907,452 55,103,121 206,894,237 7,425,910,094 0.15419 2020 2,244,198,055 4,919,701,883 24,764,994 882,038,216 8,070,703,148 54,749,068 291,513,686 7,724,440,394 0.15451 2021 2,430,265,323 5,114,403,543 23,294,582 931,043,622 8,499,007,070 54,039,947 293,711,372 8,151,255,751 0.15778 2022 2,591,425,680 5,225,394,381 23,288,811 956,204,399 8,796,313,271 53,217,087 342,980,102 8,400,116,082 0.15585 2023 2,918,316,115 5,627,562,103 23,777,465 1,333,934,749 9,903,590,432 52,009,128 374,728,335 9,476,852,969 0.13847 2024 3,179,166,862 5,870,123,859 27,596,003 1,404,853,295 10,481,740,019 51,142,250 394,814,493 10,035,783,276 0.13985 2025 3,343,537,774 6,135,866,273 30,320,236 1,410,541,283 10,920,265,566 50,845,233 459,437,431 10,409,982,902 0.14062 Homeowners' Property Tax Relief
The State Constitution requires
California cities do not set their own direct tax rate. The state constitution establishes the rate at 1% and allocates a portion of that amount, by an annual calculation, to all the taxing entities within a tax rate area. Beginning in 2013/14 the total Direct Rate no longer includes revenue generated from the former redevelopment tax rate areas. Challenges to recognized enforceable obligations are assumed to have been resolved during 2012/13. For the purposes of this report, residual revenue is assumed to be distributed to the City in the same proportions as general fund revenue. $0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Millions Unsecured Tax Roll
Secured Tax Roll
Property Tax Rates
10-Year Trend
Basic Bay East Bay
County Pittsburg Los Area Regional Pittsburg
Fiscal Wide Direct Medanos Rapid Park Unified School Community Year Levy Rate* Hospital Transit District District College Total 2016 1.0000 0.15020 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4644 2017 1.0000 0.15142 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4656 2018 1.0000 0.15305 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4673 2019 1.0000 0.15419 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4684 2020 1.0000 0.15451 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4687 2021 1.0000 0.15778 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4719 2022 1.0000 0.15585 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4700 2023 1.0000 0.13847 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4526 2024 1.0000 0.13985 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4540 2025 1.0000 0.13990 0.0170 0.0058 0.0273 0.2280 0.0419 1.4541 * Pittsburg Direct Rate = the weighted average of City's Share of 1% levy & Redevelopment Rate Source: Contra Costa County Assessors Office & HdL Coren & Cone
0.0000 0.0500 0.1000 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000 0.3500 2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025 Fiscal Year
Los Medanos Hospital BART East Bay Regional Park District Pittsburg Unified School District Community College
Principal Property Tax Payers
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
2024-25 2015-16
Percentage Percentage
of Total City of Total City
Taxable Taxable Taxable Taxable
Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed
Taxpayer Value Rank Value Value Rank Value
Calpine Corporation $298,500,000 1 2.85% 243,000,000 $ 4 3.78% Diablo Energy Storage LLC 255,060,188 2 2.44% 0.00%
Uss Posco Industries 251,562,289 3 2.40% 259,822,917 3 4.05% Corteva Agriscience LLC 227,295,928 4 2.17% 0.00%
K2 Pure Sol LP 208,287,157 5 1.99% 134,892,022 5 2.10%
Delta Energy Center LLC 172,400,000 6 1.65% 0.00%
K W Kirker Creek LLC 116,326,177 7 1.11% 98,391,575 7 1.53% Centen Ag Inc 102,162,385 8 0.98% 0.00%
Sierra Pacific Apartments LLC 101,565,620 9 0.97% 107,388,938 6 1.67% San Marco Properties LLC 90,970,224 10 0.87% 57,614,707 10 0.90% Dow Agrosciences LLC 0.00% 362,637,418 1 5.65%
Delta Energy Center, LLC 0.00% 292,000,000 2 4.55%
Century Plaza Corporation 0.00% 67,309,948 8 1.05%
United Spiral Pipe LLC 0.00% 58,157,413 9 0.91%
Subtotal $1,824,129,968 17.44% 1,681,214,938 $ 26.18%
Total Net Assessed Valuation:
Fiscal Year 2024-25 $10,460,828,135
Fiscal Year 2015-16 $6,422,944,733
Source: HdL Coren & Cone
Property and SalesTax Revenues
Comparisons by City
Amounts are derived from FY 2024-25 ACFRs of each city. $0
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
$70,000,000
$80,000,000
Pittsburg Oakley Brentwood Antioch Concord
Sales Tax
Bradley-Burns Base (1%) Local Add-on Measures
$5,057,615
$11,129,611
$20,875,449
$23,505,860
$28,888,802
Pittsburg Oakley Brentwood Concord Antioch
Property Tax
Glossary of Budget Terms
The City’s budget contains specialized and technical terminology that is unique to public finance and budgeting. To help the reader understand the terms, a glossary of budgetary terminology has been included in the document.
ACCOUNT – A subdivision within a fund for the purpose of classifying transactions.
ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING – The method of accounting under which revenues are recorded when they are earned (regardless of when cash is received) and expenditures are recorded when goods and services are received (regardless of when disbursements are actually made at the time).
ADOPTED BUDGET – Revenues and appropriations approved by the City Council in June for the following fiscal year.
ALLOCATED COSTS – An expense charged by one department/division to another for services performed or expenditures of a general nature that are charged to one main account and allocated to other departments/divisions by a specified formula.
ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT (ACFR) – The official financial report of the City. It includes an audit opinion as well as basic financial statements and supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal and contractual provisions.
APPROPRIATION – Legal authorization granted by City Council to make expenditures and incur obligations for a specific purpose within a specific time frame.
APPROPRIATION LIMIT – As defined by Section 8 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, enacted by the passage of Proposition 4 at the November 6, 1979 general election, the growth in the level of certain appropriations from tax proceeds are generally limited to the level of the prior year’s appropriation limit as adjusted for changes in cost of living and population. Other adjustments may be made for such reasons as the transfer of services from one government entity to another.
ASSESSED VALUATION - A dollar value placed on real estate or other property by the County as a basis for levying property taxes.
ATTRITION – The natural reduction of work-force due to resignations and retirements.
AUDIT – A review of the City’s accounts by an independent auditing firm to substantiate fiscal year-end balances and assure compliance with generally accepted standards for financial accounting and reporting.
BALANCED BUDGET – Where budgeted operating revenues cover or exceed budgeted noncapital operating expenditures, avoiding budgetary procedures that balance current expenditures at the expense of meeting future years’ expenses such as postponing expenditures or accruing future years’ revenues.
BOND – A municipal bond is a written promise from a local government to repay a sum of money on a specific date at a specified interest rate.
BUDGET – A plan of financial operation, including an estimate of proposed expenditures/expenses for a given period (typically a fiscal year) and the proposed means of financing them (revenue estimates). Upon approval by the City Council, the budget appropriation resolution is the legal basis for expenditures/expenses in the fiscal year.
BUDGET AMENDMENT – A legal procedure utilized by the City Manager to revise a budget appropriation during the year. Adjustments to expenditures within or between department budgets may be accomplished administratively. City Council approval is required for additional appropriations from fund balances or new revenue sources.
BUDGET STABILIZATION FUND – A reserved amount of money placed in a separate fund to be used in times when regular income is disrupted or decreased in order for typical operations to continue.
BUDGET YEAR – The fiscal year for which the budget is being considered; fiscal year following the current year.
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYERS’ RETIREE BENEFIT TRUST (CERBT) – The California Employers' Benefit Trust (CERBT) Fund is an IRC Section 115 irrevocable trust dedicated to prefunding Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) for all eligible California public agencies.
CALPERS – The California Public Employees Retirement System provides retirement benefits for the employees of public agencies in the State of California.
CAPITAL BUDGET – Annual appropriations for capital improvement projects such as street improvements, building construction and various kinds of major facility maintenance. Capital projects are supported by a five-year expenditure plan, which details funding sources and expenditure amounts. They often are multi-year projects, which require funding beyond the oneyear period of the annual budget.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) – A financial plan of authorized expenditures for tangible, long-term construction of, or improvements to, public physical facilities CAPITAL OUTLAY – A budget appropriation category, which budgets all equipment, land or other fixed assets having a unit cost of more than $5,000 and an estimated useful life of over five years.
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND – A governmental fund used to account for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by proprietary funds and trust funds.
CARRYOVER OR CARRY FORWARD – Process of carrying a budgeted and encumbered item from the current fiscal year to the next fiscal year.
CASH BASIS OR CASH METHOD – An Accounting method that recognizes income and deductions when money is received or paid. The modified accrual method is the preferred method for government organizations.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) - One of the longest-running programs of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, funds local community development activities such as affordable housing, anti-poverty programs, and infrastructure development.
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS (CFDs) - Localities that have been empowered by state law to levy special taxes on their residents to fund the capital costs of a wide variety of public improvements (such as roads and sewer services), as well as the ongoing operation and
maintenance costs of a limited number of public services (such as schools, police and fire protection services, libraries, etc.) that benefit the community.
CONTINGENCY – An appropriation of funds to cover unforeseen events that occur during the fiscal year.
COST RECOVERY – The establishment of user fees that is equal to the full cost of providing services including indirect overhead and administrative costs.
DEBT SERVICE – Payment of the principal and interest on an obligation resulting from the issuance of bonds, notes or leasing arrangements.
DEBT SERVICE FUND – A governmental fund used to account for the accumulation of resources and payment of general obligation bond principal and interest from governmental resources and special assessment bond principal and interest from special assessment levies when the government is obligated in some manner for the payment.
DEFICIT – An excess of expenditures or expenses over revenues (resources).
DEPARTMENT – An organizational unit comprised of divisions or programs. It is the basic unit of service responsibility that may include a broad mandate of related activities.
DIVISION – A sub-section (or activity) within a department, which furthers the objectives of the City Council by providing specific services or programs.
ENCUMBRANCE – A contingent liability, contract, purchase order, payroll commitment, tax payable, or legal penalty that is chargeable to an account. It ceases to be an encumbrance when paid-out or when the actual liability amount is determined and recorded as an expense.
EMERGENCY OPERATION CENTER (EOC) – A location from which centralized emergency management can be performed. EOC facilities are established by an agency or jurisdiction to coordinate the overall agency or jurisdictional response and support to an emergency.
ENTERPRISE FUND – A type of fund established for the total costs of those governmental facilities and services, which are operated in a manner similar to private enterprises. These programs are entirely or predominantly self-supporting. The City of Pittsburg maintains several Enterprise Funds that include Water, Sewer, Marina, Waterfront Operations, Island Energy and the Pittsburg Power Company Funds.
EXPENDITURES – The actual spending of Governmental Funds set aside by appropriations.
EXPENSE – The actual spending of Proprietary Funds set-aside by an appropriation.
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY - The ability of a government to sustain its current spending, tax and other policies in the long run without threatening government solvency or defaulting on some of its liabilities or promised expenditures.
FISCAL YEAR – The City’s year for accounting and budgeting purposes, which begins on July 1 and ends on June 30.
FORECAST – Estimate of the future impact of current revenue and expenditure policies based on specific assumptions about future conditions such as inflation or population growth. Forecasts are neither predictions about the future nor a statement of policy intentions.
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) – The amount of time a position has been budgeted for in terms of the amount of time a regular, full-time employee normally works in a year.
FUND – An independent fiscal and accounting entity used to record all financial transactions related to the specific purpose for which the fund was created.
FUND BALANCE – The amount of financial resources available for use. Generally, this represents the detail of all the annual operating surpluses and deficits since the fund’s inception.
GENERAL FUND – The primary fund used to account for all revenues and expenditures of the City not legally restricted as to use. This fund is used to offset the cost of the City’s general operations. Examples of departments financed by the General Fund include the Community and Economic Development, Police, Public Works, Recreation, and other Administrative Departments.
GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT (GHAD) – A local assessment district formed for the purpose of prevention, mitigation, abatement, or control of geologic hazards, including an actual or threatened landslide, land subsidence, soil erosion, earthquake, or any other natural or unnatural movement of land or earth.
GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (GASB) – An independent, nongovernmental organization that establishes Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for state and local governments in the United States.
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (GFOA) – A professional organization of public officials united to enhance and promote the professional management of governmental financial resources by identifying, developing and advancing fiscal strategies, policies, and practices for the public benefit.
GOVERNANCE – The process of providing community leadership and overall direction for a City.
It involves understanding the community’s desires for its future, focusing those desires into an achievable vision and establishing specific objectives and goals in order to realize that future vision. It also involves leadership in explaining City policies to the community and gathering support for City programs.
GRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) - A system designed to capture, store, manipulate, analyze, manage, and present all types of spatial or geographical data.
GRANT – Contributions, gifts of cash or other assets from another governmental entity to be used or expended for a specific purpose, activity or facility.
INFRASTRUCTURE – Facilities on which the continuance and growth of a community depend, such as streets and roads, sewers, public building, parks, etc.
INTERFUND TRANSFER IN/OUT- Monies transferred from one fund to another. Such money is transferred to finance the operations of another fund or to reimburse the fund for certain expenditures/expenses such as administrative support.
INTERNAL SERVICE FUND – A fund used to account for the services provided by one department to other departments on a cost-reimbursement basis.
MANDATORY FRINGE BENEFIT – Benefits the City pays on behalf of its employees including health and dental insurance, pension and social security.
MUNICIPAL CODE – A book that contains the City Council-approved ordinances currently in effect. The Code defines City policy. The Code contains the “laws” of the City.
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) - As authorized by the Clean Water Act, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into waters of the United States.
NORMAL COST (NC) RATE – Pension rate that represents the annual cost of service accrual for the upcoming fiscal year, for active employees. Normal cost is shown as a percentage of payroll and paid as part of the payroll reporting process.
OBJECTIVES – The expected results or achievements of a budget activity, which can be measured and achieved within a given time frame. Achievement of the objective advances the organization towards a corresponding goal.
OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) – The benefits that an employee will begin to receive as part of his or her retirement benefits package.
OPERATING BUDGET – Annual appropriation of funds for on-going program cost, including salaries and benefits, services and supplies, debt service and capital outlay.
ORDINANCE – A formal legislative enactment by the City Council. It has the full force and effect of law within City boundaries unless preempted by a higher form of law. An ordinance has higher legal standing than a resolution.
PROJECT – Long-term investments in public facilities and infrastructure; also known as capital improvements. The amount spent may overlap from year to year until the project is completed.
PROPOSED BUDGET – The financial and operating document submitted by the City Manager to the City Council for consideration.
RESERVE – an account used to record a portion of the fund balance as legally segregated for a specific use, usually at a future time.
RESOLUTION – A special order of the City Council, which has a lower legal standing than an ordinance.
REVENUES – Monies received or anticipated by a local government from both tax and non-tax sources during the fiscal year. Revenues include income from user fees, taxes, permits and other sources.
SALARIES AND BENEFITS – A budget category which generally accounts for full-time and parttime employees, overtime expenses and all employee benefits, such as medical, dental and retirement.
SECTION 115 TRUST – Employer assets placed in a trust, which is used for the designated purpose of prefunding pensions and other post-employment benefits, such as retiree medical costs.
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES – Expenditures/expenses for supplies, materials and services, which ordinarily are consumed within a fiscal year and which are not included in inventories.
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND – This fund type collects revenues that are restricted by the City, State or Federal government as to how the City might spend them. The City of Pittsburg maintains
number of Special Revenue Funds that include Gas Tax, Measure J, the Citywide and Oak Hills Lighting and Landscape Districts, Park Dedication, Traffic Mitigation, Community Development Block Grant funds among others.
SUBSIDY – Supplemental resources provided to ensure adequate funding when anticipated expenditures exceed revenues.
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY – The primary purpose of the Successor Agency is to administer the wind down of the previous Redevelopment Agency’s operations, which entails continued payment for financial obligations and fulfillment of contractual obligations entered into by the Redevelopment Agency prior to the enactment of Assembly Bill 26, which caused the dissolution of all Redevelopment Agencies in California.
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX (TOT) – This tax is collected from the operators of hotels and motels located within the City. The tax collected is then remitted to the City.
UNFUNDED ACTUARIAL ACCRUED LIABILITY (UAL) – Amount of future obligations not covered by assets currently set aside for that purpose, such as pensions or other postemployment benefits.
USER FEES – Fees charged to users of a particular service provided by the City.
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 15, 2026
TO: Chair and Governing Board Members
FROM: Darin E. Gale‚ Executive Director
Elena Adair, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg Resolution Approving the Preliminary Official Statement for the 2026 Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds to Be Issued by the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Based on current market rates, a refinancing of the outstanding bonds is anticipated to generate over $2,175,000 of present value savings, or $10,850,000 in gross cash flow savings. The savings will be shared among the taxing entities, including the City’s General Fund. The refunding will also shorten the final maturity of the Successor Agency’s bonds from 2036 to 2030. Successor Agency Board approved the refunding and documents at its April 20, 2026, meeting, and the Countywide Oversight Board approved the refunding and legal documents at its April 23, 2026, meeting. California Department of Finance has also approved that the refunding meets the legal requirements.
The purpose of this item is to obtain Successor Agency Board approval regarding the Preliminary Official Statement, which will serve as the primary marketing and disclosure document for selling the Refunding Bonds to investors.
FISCAL IMPACT
The City will be reimbursed for its staff time and costs associated with the refinancing, which will be included in the bond issuance costs. Other costs associated with issuing the Refunding Bonds will be paid out of the bond proceeds as well. Savings figures discussed in this staff report are net of issuance costs. Anticipated additional property tax revenue to the General Fund as a result of this refinancing is approximately $0.5
million annually.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg Approving Preliminary Official Statement for Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds to be Issued by the Successor Agency for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg.
BACKGROUND
The Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg (“Agency”) is in the process of refunding the following series of Tax Allocation Bonds:
• Housing Set Aside Tax Allocation Bonds (Taxable), 2006 Series A (“2006 Series A Taxable Bonds”)
• Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 (“2014 Bonds”) • Housing Set Aside Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (Taxable), 2016 Series A (“2016 Series A Taxable Bonds”)
• Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, 2016 Series A (“2016 Series A Tax-Exempt Bonds”)
There is an additional series of 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds that are structured as capital appreciation bonds and are non-callable and so not eligible for a refunding. The 2006 Series A Taxable Bonds, 2014 Bonds, 2016 Series A Taxable Bonds, and 2016 Series A Tax-Exempt Bonds (collectively the “Prior Bonds”) will all be refunded through the issuance of the Refunding Bonds, Series A and Series B (Taxable) (collectively, the “Refunding Bonds”). Once issued, the Refunding Bonds will be subordinate to the prior 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds.
The Agency is refinancing the Prior Bonds to achieve debt service savings, improve cash flow, and accelerate the final maturity of outstanding tax allocation bond debt. As shown in the table below, the refunding is projected to achieve net present value savings and material annual cash flow savings in the near term (FY 2027 through FY 2029). In addition to lowering overall borrowing costs, the refunding will simplify the Agency’s debt profile and associated reporting requirements by reducing the total number of outstanding series and by shortening the final maturity by approximately 6 years (from 2036 to 2030).
Summary of Anticipated Refunding Structure
See Exhibit A (Good Faith Estimates) for more detail regarding estimated true interest cost, anticipated issuance costs, proceeds from issuing the Refunding Bonds, and total debt service payment on the Refunding Bonds through final maturity.
On April 20, 2026, the Agency Board considered the proposed Refunding Bonds and adopted an Agency Resolution approving the forms of the Indenture of Trust, Irrevocable Refunding Instructions, and the Bond Purchase Agreement. In addition, the Resolution authorized City staff to proceed, provided the Refunding Bonds comply with the provisions of Section 34177.5(a)(1) of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code. This Section limits the amount of Refunding Bonds to the amount required to refund Prior Bonds and pay the costs of issuing the Refunding Bonds, including amounts required to purchase bond insurance and a reserve fund surety bond for the Refunding Bonds if applicable.
SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
On March 11, 2026, the City’s Finance Management Subcommittee considered the issuance of the proposed Refunding Bonds. That discussion evaluated the outstanding tax allocation bond debt profile, current market conditions, and potential debt service savings from issuing the Refunding Bonds. The Finance Management Subcommittee supported staff’s recommendation to proceed with the refunding, subject to market conditions, in order to achieve debt service savings, improve near-term cash flow, and optimize the overall debt structure of the Agency.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff, in coordination with the financing team, have continued to work towards the issuance of the Refunding Bonds and, based on current market conditions, the Refunding Bonds are still anticipated to result in significant cashflow savings. Based on the current market rates, the Refunding Bonds are estimated to produce approximately $10,850,000 of cashflow savings and approximately $2,175,000 net present value savings. The final amount of savings is expected to fluctuate until the Refunding Bonds are sold and interest rates are locked. These savings will be distributed to taxing
entities annually through final maturity via the current mechanism by which local taxing entities receive residual tax increment revenues. The City’s General Fund is projected to receive approximately 17.1% of the total savings.
The anticipated structure also incorporates several optimization strategies, including (i) replacing existing cash-funded reserve accounts with surety policies provided by a bond insurer, allowing excess reserve funds to be applied toward the refinancing to reduce the size of the Refunding Bonds, and (ii) restructuring later maturities into earlier years to shorten the final maturity of the debt and maximize cash flow relief to the taxing entities.
The savings from issuing the Refunding Bonds continue meet the threshold for required savings for tax allocation refunding bonds under Section 34177.5(a)(1). Up until such date as the Refunding Bonds are sold to bond investors, the interest rates on the Refunding Bonds are subject to change. Nevertheless, as a condition of issuance, the Refunding Bonds must result in the required savings as identified under Section 34177.5(a)(1).
City staff and financing team have worked with Jones Hall LLP (Bond and Disclosure Counsel) to prepare the draft Preliminary Official Statement for the Refunding Bonds (Exhibit C to this Staff Report). The Preliminary Official Statement will serve as the primary marketing piece used to sell the Refunding Bonds to investors. The distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement is subject to federal securities laws, including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These laws require the Preliminary Official Statement to include all facts that would be material to an investor in the Refunding Bonds. Material information is information that has a substantial likelihood of being significant in the deliberations of the reasonable investor when deciding whether to buy or sell the Refunding Bonds. The Preliminary Official Statement summarizes key information from a Fiscal Consultant’s Report prepared by HdL Coren & Cone.
The attached Preliminary Official Statement has been reviewed and approved for transmittal to the Agency Board by City staff and the financing team.
Included in the back of the Preliminary Official Statement is the Continuing Disclosure Agreement that the Agency will enter into with bond investors. Under the terms of this Agreement, the Agency will provide annual reporting regarding key financial and operational metrics within the Project Area and will provide timely notice of upon the occurrence of enumerated significant events (for example, a change in trustee, a rating change, or a missed debt payment on the Refunding Bonds). The terms of this Continuing Disclosure Agreement are materially similar to the terms of the existing Continuing Disclosure Agreements on the Prior Bonds.
ANTICIPATED TIMING
Following an approval of the Preliminary Official Statement, the Refunding Bonds are
estimated to close in late July with the Prior Bonds being redeemed shortly thereafter.
Status Financing Step
Completed Successor Agency Board approval of financing documents and refunding plan
Completed Oversight Board approval of financing documents and refunding plan
Completed California Department of Finance (“DOF”) review and approval June 15, 2026 Successor Agency Board considers Preliminary Official Statement Estimated Late June Subordination Process for Taxing Entities’ Pass-throughs Estimated Late June Credit Rating Process Completed
Estimated July Price the Refunding Bonds
Estimated Late July Close the Refunding Bonds
Estimated Late July Refund prior 2006 Housing Bonds and 2014 Bonds August 1, 2026 Refund prior 2016 Housing Bonds (First Call Date) September 1, 2026 Refund prior 2016 Subordinate Bonds (First Call Date) ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
Attachment A – Good Faith Estimates
Attachment B – Draft Preliminary Official Statement
Resolution No. Page 1 of 2 June 15, 2026
BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
Approving Preliminary Official Statement for )
Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds )
To be Issued by the Successor Agency for the ) RESOLUTION NO.
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg )
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg (the “Former Agency”) was a public body, corporate and politic, duly established and authorized to transact business and exercise powers under and pursuant to the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, constituting Part 1 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code of the State (the “Law”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34172(a) of the California Health and Safety Code (unless otherwise noted, Section references hereinafter being to such Code), the Former Agency has been dissolved and no longer exists as a public body, corporate and politic, and pursuant to Section 34173, and the City of Pittsburg (the “City”) has become the successor entity to the Former Agency (the “Successor Agency”); and WHEREAS, on April 20, 2026, the Successor Agency adopted its Resolution No. 26- 060, authorizing the issuance of subordinate tax allocation refunding bonds (the “Refunding Bonds”) to refund certain outstanding series of tax allocation bonds previously issued by the Former Agency or the Successor Agency, as applicable; and WHEREAS, on April 23, 2026, the Countywide Oversight Board adopted its Resolution OB No. 2026-15, approving the Successor Agency’s action to issue the Refunding Bonds and the California Department of Finance thereafter issued its approval letter related thereto; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has, with the assistance of its financing team, prepared a form of Official Statement for the Refunding Bonds, containing material information relating to the Successor Agency and the Refunding Bonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Successor Agency for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg, as follows:
1. Approval of Official Statement and Continuing Disclosure Undertaking. The Successor Agency hereby approves the preliminary Official Statement in substantially the form on file with the Successor Agency. Distribution of the preliminary Official Statement by the Successor Agency and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, as underwriter (the “Underwriter”), is hereby approved, and, prior to the distribution of the preliminary Official Statement, the Executive Director or his designee, on behalf of the Successor Agency (each, an “Authorized Officer”), is hereby authorized and directed to deem the preliminary Official Statement “final” pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Rule”). The execution of the final Official Statement, which shall include such changes and additions thereto deemed advisable by the Authorized Officer executing the same, and such
Resolution No. Page 2 of 2 June 15, 2026
information permitted to be excluded from the preliminary Official Statement pursuant to the Rule, is hereby approved for delivery to the purchasers of the Refunding Bonds, and each Authorized Officer, acting alone, is authorized and directed to execute and deliver the final Official Statement for and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to deliver to the Underwriter a certificate with respect to the information set forth therein and to deliver to the Underwriter a continuing disclosure undertaking substantially in the form appended to the final Official Statement.
2. Official Actions. The Authorized Officers and any and all other officers of the City and the Successor Agency are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Refunding Bonds. Whenever, in this Resolution, any officer is directed to execute or countersign any document or take any action, such execution, countersigning or action may be taken on behalf of such officer by any person designated by such officer to act on his or her behalf in the case such officer is absent or unavailable.
3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of approval and adoption thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Governing Board of the Successor Agency for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 15th day of June, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Dionne Adams, Chair
ATTEST:
__
Alice E. Evenson, Agency Secretary
Attachment A: Good Faith Estimates
The good faith estimates set forth herein are provided with respect to the Bonds in accordance with California Government Code Section 5852.1. Such good faith estimates have been provided to the Successor Agency by NHA Advisors, LLC as municipal advisor to the Successor Agency (the “Municipal Advisor”), each with respect to the Refunding Bonds as of June 1, 2026.
Information to be disclosed per Government Code Section 5852.1 Estimates True interest cost of the Refunding Bonds (the rate necessary to discount the amounts payable on the respective principal and interest payment dates to the purchase price received for the new issue of bonds)
3.04%
Finance charge of the Refunding Bonds (the sum of fees/charges paid to third parties) $809,280
Amount of proceeds received by the public body from the sale of the Refunding Bonds, less the finance charge of the Refunding Bonds and any reserves or capitalized interest paid or funded with proceeds of the bonds
$57,998,951
The total payment amount (the sum total of all debt service payments on the Refunding Bonds, plus the finance charge of the bonds not paid from bond proceeds) $62,477,791
The foregoing estimates constitute good faith estimates only. The actual principal amount of the Refunding Bonds issued and sold, the true interest cost thereof, the finance charges thereof, the amount of proceeds received therefrom and total payment amount with respect thereto may differ from such good faith estimates due to (a) the actual date of the sale of the Refunding Bonds being different than the date assumed for purposes of such estimates, (b) the actual principal amount of Refunding Bonds sold being different from the Estimated Principal Amount, (c) the actual amortization of the Refunding Bonds being different than the amortization assumed for purposes of such estimates, (d) the actual market interest rates at the time of sale of the Refunding Bonds being different than those estimated for purposes of such estimates, (e) other market conditions, or (f) alterations in the Agency financing plan, or a combination of such factors. The actual date of sale of the Refunding Bonds and the actual principal amount of Refunding Bonds sold will be determined by the Agency based on the timing of the need for proceeds of the Refunding Bonds and other factors. The actual interest rates borne by the Refunding Bonds will depend on market interest rates at the time of sale thereof. The actual amortization of the Refunding Bonds will also depend, in part, on market interest rates at the time of sale thereof. Market interest rates are affected by economic and other factors beyond the control of the Agency.
Jones Hall Draft of June 8, 2026
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JULY ___, 2026
NEW ISSUE—BOOK-ENTRY S&P: “____”
See “RATING”
In the opinion of Jones Hall LLP, as Bond Counsel, subject, however to certain qualifications described herein, under existing law, the interest on the 2026 Series A Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and such interest is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Interest on the 2026 Series A Bonds may be subject to the corporate alternative minimum tax. Interest on the 2026 Taxable Series B Bonds is not intended to be excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes.
In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is exempt from California personal income taxes. See “TAX MATTERS.”
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
Los Medanos Community Development Project
Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds
$____________*
2026 Series A
$____________*
(Federally Taxable) 2026 Series B
Dated: Delivery Date Due: September 1, as shown on the inside front cover Purpose of the Bonds. The above captioned bonds (the “2026 Series A Bonds,” the “2026 Taxable Series B Bonds” and together, the “Bonds”) are being issued by the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg (the “Successor Agency”), as successor agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg (the “Former Agency”) to (i) refund four outstanding series of bonds issued by the Former Agency or Successor Agency payable from tax increment revenue generated in the Former Agency’s Los Medanos Community Development Project (the “Project Area”) and (ii) to pay costs of issuance incurred in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds (including a surety reserve premium), as more fully described herein.
Book-Entry. The Bonds will be delivered as fully registered bonds, registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), and will be available to ultimate purchasers (“Beneficial Owners”) in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, under the book-entry system maintained by DTC. Beneficial Owners will not be entitled to receive delivery of bonds representing their ownership interest in the Bonds.
Payments. Interest on the Bonds will be payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year, commencing March 1, 2027. Annual principal of, premium, if any, and semi-annual interest on the Bonds will be payable by The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (the “Trustee”), to DTC for subsequent disbursement to DTC participants, so long as DTC or its nominee remains the registered owner of the Bonds. See “THE BONDS.”
No Redemption. The Bonds are not subject to redemption prior to maturity. See “THE BONDS – No Redemption.” Security for the Bonds. The Bonds are payable from and secured by a pledge of subordinate tax increment revenues (as described herein) allocable to the Successor Agency under the Dissolution Act (described herein) to be derived from parcels in the Project Area, and from moneys in certain funds and accounts as provided in an Indenture of Trust dated as of July 1, 2026 (the “Indenture”) by and between the Successor Agency and the Trustee, as further described in this Official Statement. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS.” Following issuance of the Bonds, there will only be one series of tax allocation bonds outstanding payable on a basis that is senior to the Bonds, the Former Agency’s Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 1999, which are capital appreciation bonds maturing on August 1, 2030, as described herein. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS – Outstanding Senior Obligations.” Limited Obligations. The Bonds are special, limited obligations of the Successor Agency, secured by an irrevocable pledge of, and are payable from the Subordinate Pledged Tax Revenues and the other funds described in this Official Statement. The Bonds are not a debt of the City of Pittsburg (the “City”), the County of Contra Costa (the “County”), the State of California (the “State”) or any of their political subdivisions except the Successor Agency, and none of the City, the County, the State nor any of their political subdivisions except the Successor Agency is liable thereon. The Bonds, interest thereon and premium, if any, are not payable out of any funds or properties other than those set forth in the Indenture. Neither the members of the Successor Agency, the Countywide Oversight Board, the County Board of Supervisors nor any persons executing the Bonds are liable personally for the Bonds.
This cover page of the Official Statement contains information for quick reference only. It is not a complete summary of the Bonds.
Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. Attention is hereby directed to certain risk factors more fully described in this Official Statement. See “RISK FACTORS.” The Bonds are offered, when, as and if issued, subject to the approval of Jones Hall LLP, San Mateo, California, as Bond Counsel to the Successor Agency. Jones Hall LLP is also serving as Disclosure Counsel to the Successor Agency. In addition, certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Successor Agency by the City Attorney of the City, as general counsel to the Successor Agency. Certain legal matters will be passed on for the Underwriter by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP, Newport Beach, California, as Underwriter’s Counsel. It is anticipated that the Bonds will be available for delivery through the facilities of DTC on or about July ___, 2026*. [Stifel logo]
The date of this Official Statement is ___________, 2026. ______________________
* Preliminary, subject to change. This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such jurisdiction.
MATURITY SCHEDULES
$____________
2026 SERIES A BONDS
Maturity Date
(September 1)
Principal
Amount
Interest
Rate Yield Price
CUSIP†
(Base 724568)
2027
2028
2029
2030
$____________
(FEDERALLY TAXABLE) 2026 SERIES B BONDS
Maturity Date
(September 1)
Principal
Amount
Interest
Rate Yield Price
CUSIP†
(Base 724568)
2027
† CUSIP is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services, managed by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC on behalf of The American Bankers Association. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CUSIP Services. CUSIP numbers have been assigned by an independent company not affiliated with the Successor Agency and are included solely for the convenience of investors. Neither the Successor Agency nor the Underwriter assumes any responsibility for the accuracy of the CUSIP data.
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
(CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA)
SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD/CITY COUNCIL
Dionne Adams, Chair and Mayor
Angelica Lopez, Vice Chair and Vice Mayor
Jelani Killings, Member and City Council Member
Juan Antonio Banales, Member and City Council Member
Arlene Kobata, Member and City Council Member
SUCCESSOR AGENCY/CITY STAFF
Darin Gale, Executive Director and City Manager
Elena Adair, Treasurer and City Director of Finance
Alice E. Evenson, Secretary and City Clerk
____________________________________________
SPECIAL SERVICES
Municipal Advisor
NHA Advisors, LLC
San Rafael, California
Bond and Disclosure Counsel
Jones Hall LLP
San Mateo, California
Fiscal Consultant
HdL Coren & Cone
Brea, California
Trustee
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
San Francisco, California
Verification Agent
[To come]
-iTABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Authority and Use of Proceeds .......................... 1 The City and the Successor Agency .................. 2
The Redevelopment Plan and the Project
Area ............................................................... 3 Security for the Bonds ........................................ 3 Reserve Insurance Policy .................................. 4 Limited Obligations ............................................. 4 Further Information ............................................. 5 REFUNDING PLAN ............................................... 6 General .............................................................. 6 Sources and Uses of Funds ............................... 6 Debt Service Schedules ..................................... 7 THE BONDS .......................................................... 8 Authority for Issuance ........................................ 8 Description of the Bonds .................................... 8 No Redemption of Bonds ................................... 8
THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND THE
DISSOLUTION ACT ........................................... 9 SECURITY FOR THE BONDS ............................ 12
Pledge of Subordinate Pledged Tax
Revenues ..................................................... 12 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules .... 13
Reserve Account; Reserve Policy .................... 17 Outstanding Senior Obligations ....................... 17 Statutory Pass-Through Payments and PassThrough Agreements ................................... 17 Insufficiency of Revenues ................................ 19 FACTORS AFFECTING TAX INCREMENT ........ 20
Property Tax Collection Procedures ................ 20
Unitary Property ............................................... 21 Article XIIIA of the State Constitution ............... 21 Appropriations Limitation – Article XIIIB ........... 22 Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the State
Constitution .................................................. 23 Appeals of Assessed Values ............................ 23 Proposition 8 .................................................... 24 Propositions 218 and 26 .................................. 24 Future Initiatives .............................................. 24 THE PROJECT AREA ......................................... 25 Information Concerning the Project Area ........ 25
General ............................................................ 25 Land Use Composition .................................... 26 Historic Taxable Assessed Values .................. 27
Largest Property Taxpayers ............................ 28 Assessment Appeals ....................................... 28 Historic Tax Increment Revenues ................... 29
Estimated Fiscal Year 2025-26 Tax
Increment Revenues ................................... 30 Projection of Gross Tax Revenues .................. 31
Estimated Debt Service Coverage................... 32
RISK FACTORS .................................................. 33 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ..... 33
Reduction in Taxable Value ............................. 33 Risks to Real Estate Market ............................ 34 Reduction in Inflationary Rate ......................... 35 Levy and Collection of Taxes .......................... 35 Bankruptcy and Foreclosure ............................ 35 Estimated Revenues ....................................... 36 Hazardous Substances ................................... 36 Natural Disasters ............................................. 36 Changes in the Law ......................................... 38 Loss of Tax-Exemption .................................... 38 Secondary Market............................................ 38 TAX MATTERS .................................................... 39 UNDERWRITING ................................................ 40 LEGAL MATTERS ............................................... 41 NO LITIGATION .................................................. 41 RATING ............................................................... 41 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE .............................. 42 CONCLUDING INFORMATION .......................... 42
Audited Financial Statements .......................... 42 Professionals Involved in the Offering ............. 42 Miscellaneous .................................................. 43 APPENDIX A – SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE APPENDIX B – FORM OF BOND COUNSEL OPINION
APPENDIX C – FISCAL CONSULTANT’S REPORT
APPENDIX D – FORM OF SUCCESSOR AGENCY CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE APPENDIX E – AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE CITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 APPENDIX F – CITY OF PITTSBURG AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY GENERAL INFORMATION APPENDIX G – BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT
No Offering May Be Made Except by this Official Statement. No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the Bonds other than as contained in this Official Statement, and if given or made, such other information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized.
No Unlawful Offers or Solicitations. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy in any state in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or in which the person making such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.
Effective Date. This Official Statement speaks only as of its date, and the information and expressions of opinion contained in this Official Statement are subject to change without notice. Neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale of the Bonds will, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Successor Agency or the Project Area since the date of this Official Statement.
Use of this Official Statement. This Official Statement is submitted in connection with the sale of the Bonds referred to in this Official Statement and may not be reproduced or used, in whole or in part, for any other purpose. This Official Statement is not a contract with the purchasers of the Bonds.
Preparation of this Official Statement. The information contained in this Official Statement has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but this information is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness.
The Underwriter has provided the following sentence for inclusion in this Official Statement: The Underwriter has reviewed the information in this Official Statement in accordance with, and as part of, its responsibilities to investors under the federal securities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of this transaction, but the Underwriter does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
Document References and Summaries. All references to and summaries of the Indenture or other documents contained in this Official Statement are subject to the provisions of those documents and do not purport to be complete statements of those documents.
Bonds are Exempt from Securities Laws Registration. The issuance and sale of the Bonds have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in reliance upon exemptions for the issuance and sale of municipal securities provided under Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 3(a)(12) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Estimates and Projections. Certain statements included or incorporated by reference in this Official Statement constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used such as “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “budget” or other similar words.
THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CERTAIN RESULTS OR OTHER EXPECTATIONS CONTAINED IN SUCH FORWARDLOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS
WHICH MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS DESCRIBED TO BE MATERIALLY
DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY DOES NOT PLAN TO ISSUE ANY
UPDATES OR REVISIONS TO THOSE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IF OR WHEN ITS EXPECTATIONS, OR EVENTS, CONDITIONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES ON WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED OCCUR.
Website. The City maintains an Internet website, but the information on the website is not incorporated in this Official Statement.
-1-
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
Los Medanos Community Development Project
Subordinate Tax Allocating Refunding Bonds
$____________*
2026 Series A
$____________*
(Federally Taxable) 2026 Series B
INTRODUCTION
This introduction is not a summary of this Official Statement. It is only a brief description and guide to, and is qualified by, the more complete and detailed information contained in the entire Official Statement including the cover page and the Appendixes hereto, and the documents summarized or described herein. A full review should be made of the entire Official Statement. The offering of the Bonds to potential investors is made only by means of the entire Official Statement.
This Official Statement, including the cover page, is provided to furnish information in connection with the sale by the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg (the “Successor Agency”) of the following series of bonds:
Los Medanos Community Development Project Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, 2026 Series A (the “2026 Series A Bonds”); and Los Medanos Community Development Project Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, (Federally Taxable) 2026 Series B (the “2026 Taxable Series B Bonds” and together with the “2026 Series A Bonds,” the “Bonds”).
Authority and Use of Proceeds
The Successor Agency is issuing the Bonds pursuant to authority granted by Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) and Part 1.85 of Division 24 (commencing with Section 34170) of the California Health and Safety Code (the “Law”), Article 11 (commencing with Section 53580) of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Refunding Law”), including the Dissolution Act described herein. The Bonds are being issued pursuant to an Indenture of Trust dated as of July 1, 2026 (the “Indenture”) by and between the Successor Agency and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”).
* Preliminary; subject to change.
-2-
The Successor Agency is issuing the Bonds in order to redeem and defease the following outstanding series of bonds (collectively, the “Prior Bonds”) issued by the Former Agency or the Successor Agency, as applicable:
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg Los Medanos Community Development Project Housing Set Aside Tax Allocation Bonds, (Taxable) 2006 Series A (the “2006 Series A Taxable Bonds”);
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg Los Medanos Community Development Project Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 (the “2014 Bonds”);
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg Los Medanos Community Development Project Housing Set Aside Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (Taxable), 2016 Series A (the “2016 Series A Taxable Bonds”); and Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg Los Medanos Community Development Project Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, 2016 Series A (the “2016 Series A Tax-Exempt Bonds”);
Proceeds of the Bonds will also be used to pay the costs of issuing the Bonds, including the premium on the Reserve Policy.
The City and the Successor Agency
The City and the County. The City of Pittsburg (the “City”) is located in the eastern portion of Contra Costa County (the “County”) at the confluence of the San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers about 40 miles northeast of San Francisco. The City’s estimated population at January 1, 2026 was 76,484. The City is administered by a Council Manager form of government. The mayor and four City Council members are elected at large for four-year terms.
For certain information regarding the City, see “APPENDIX F – City of Pittsburg and Contra Costa County General Information.” The Bonds are not an obligation of the City or the County.
The Former Agency and the Successor Agency. As a result of the Dissolution Act (described herein) as of February 1, 2012, all redevelopment agencies in the State were dissolved, including the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pittsburg (the “Former Agency”), and successor agencies were designated as successor entities to the former redevelopment agencies to expeditiously wind down the affairs of the former redevelopment agencies. The Former Agency was a redevelopment agency with all of the powers vested in such entities under the Law. Pursuant to Section 34173 of the Health and Safety Code (described herein), the City acts as the Successor Agency to the Former Agency. Subdivision (g) of Section 34173 of the Health and Safety Code, added by AB 1484 (described herein), expressly affirms that the Successor Agency is a separate public and legal entity from the City, that the two entities shall not merge, and that the liabilities of the Former Agency will not be transferred to the City nor will the assets of the Former Agency become assets of the City.
The City Council of the City (the “City Council”) was the governing board of the Former Agency and is the governing board of the Successor Agency. See “THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND THE DISSOLUTION ACT.”