A-10 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Revised Draft
Placentia 2021 Housing Element FAQ
5. What is the "RHNA" why is it important?
Each California city is required to plan for new housing to accommodate a share of regional needs. The Regional Housing Needs Assessment ("RHNA") is the process established in State law' by which housing needs are determined.
Prior to each planning cycle the total new housing need for each region of California is detennined by HCD based upon economic and demographic trends, existing housing problems such as overcrowding and overpayment, and additional housing needed to ensure reasonable vacancy rates and replace units lost due to demolition or natural disasters.
Placentia is located within the Southern California Association of Governments ("SCAG") region, which includes Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial and Ventura counties. The total housing need for the SCAG region is distributed to cities and counties by SCAG based upon objectives and criteria established in State law.'° In 2019 HCD determined that the total new housing need for the entire SCAG region in the 6"' Housing Element cycle is 1,341,827 units. In March 2021 SCAG adopted the RHNA plan for the 6"' cycle, which fully allocates the RHNA to jurisdictions in the SCAG region.' Table 3 shows the RHNA allocations for Placentia, Orange County, and the entire SCAG region.
Table 3. 6" Cycle RHNA - Placentia, Orange County and SCAG Region 0 range
Placentia Count Region
j 4,374 1 183861 1 1,341,827
Housing need allocation 2021-2029
Source: SLA[., 3/9/LW I
The RHNA also distributes each jurisdiction's total housing need into four income categories (the extremely -low and very -low categories are combined for RHNA purposes). Placentia's 6`" cycle RHNA allocation by income category is shown in Table 4.
Table 4. 6"' RHNA by Income Category - Placentia
Extremely Low
+ Very Low
Low Moderate
Above
Moderate
Total
1,231 680
Source SCAG, 3/4/2021
I 770
1,693 I
6. Is the RHNA a construction mandate?
4,374
The RHNA allocation identifies the projected amount of additional housing a jurisdiction would need in order to have enough housing at all price levels to fully accommodate its assigned share projected growth over the 8 -year planning period white also eliminating existing problems of overcrowding and overpayment. The RHNA is a planning requirement based upon housing need, not a construction quota or mandate. jurisdictions are not required to build housing or issue permits to achieve their RHNA ° California Government Code Sec. 65584 et seq
10 California Government Code Sec. 65584(d)
" httasllwwa.scao.ea aevineeorams/vanes/hausinn as..
August 2021 Page 4
A-1 1 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Revised Draft
Placentia 2021 Housing Element FAQ
allocations. but some provisions of State law establish specific requirements when housing production falls short of RHNA allocations. One such requirement is streamlined review and approval of housing development applications that meet specific standards." Other than requirements for streamlined permit processing, there are currently no legal or financial penalties imposed on cities for failing to achieve their RHNA allocations.
7. What must cities do to comply with the RHNA?
The Housing Element must provide an evaluation of the city's capacity for additional housing based on land use patterns, development regulations. other development constraints (such as infrastructure availability and environmental conditions) and real estate market trends. The analysis must be prepared at a parcel -specific level of detail and identify properties (or "sites") where additional housing could be built consistent with City regulations. This evaluation is referred to as the "sites analysis" and State law requires the analysis to demonstrate that the city has adequate capacity to fully accommodate its RHNA allocation in each income category. If the sites analysis does not demonstrate that adequate capacity exists to fully accommodate the RHNA. the Housing Element must describe what steps will be taken to increase capacity commensurate with the RHNA - typically through amendments to land use and zoning regulations that could facilitate additional housing development. Such amendments typically include increasing the allowable residential density or allowing housing to be built in areas that are currently restricted to only non-residential land uses.
8. Why are cities in high-cost areas expected to have
affordable housing? Low-cost housing is not
economically feasible here due to high land prices.
State housing laws are based on the premise that every city has an obligation to adopt regulations to accommodate a range of housing types For persons at all income levels.
Every community is dependent on a variety of tow• and moderate -income workers in jobs such as landscaping. building maintenance, child and elder care, medical technicians. personal services, clerical support and retail trade, While the existing housing stock serves the needs of many residents. market rents and prices are higher than some families can afford. In addition. low•wage jobs have increased at a much faster rate than affordable housing is being built.
While cities are not required to build new 'rousing, they must ensure that their land use regulations encourage a Full range of housing types. Rental apartments typically provide the majority of affordable housing, but other types of housing such as accessory dwelling units (ADUs) can also help to address this need. Various governmental programs provide funding assistance for affordable housing. but if a city's development regulations do not allow sufficient additional housing, the housing needs of the local workforce may be shifted to other cities.
California Government Code Sec. 65913.4 (SB 35 of 2017) August2021 Page 5
A-12 March 20220c-taber 202
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Revised Draft
Placentia 2021 Housing Element FAQ
9. Placentia is fully developed. Why is the RHNA
allocation so high?
SCAG's 6' cycle RHNA allocation for the entire 6 -county region is 1,341,827 units compared to 412,137 units in the 5"' cycle. There are two main reasons why the 6" RHNA allocation is so much higher than the 5' cycle.
First, the 5' cycle RHNA allocation was established in 2012 while the severe economic effects of the "Great Recession" were discouraging growth. As a result, the 5' RHNA was uncharacteristically low. For comparison, SCAG's 4' cycle (2006-201 3) RHNA allocation was approximately 700,000 housing units.
Second. for the 6"' cycle the State made a major modification to the process for determining RHNA allocations. In prior RHNA cycles. total housing need was based only on projected poprrdation growth. However. for the 6"' RHNA cycle the State added existing need to the total RHNA calculation. Existing need includes households that are currently overcrowded (defined as more than one person per room) or are overpaying for housing (defined as more than 30% of gross income). The total 6'" cycle RHNA allocation for the SCAG region is comprised of the sum of existing need and projected need, as follows:
Existing need:
Proiected need:
Total need:
577,422 units
764.405 units
1,341,827 units
As seen from this breakdown, if existing need were excluded (as was the case in prior RHNA cycles) the total need would be similar to the 4' cycle RHNA.
With regard to jurisdictional RHNA allocations. the methodology adopted by SCAG for the 6'" cycle places greater emphasis on the proximity of housing to jobs and public transit rather than availability of vacant developable land. As a result, the urbanized areas of Los Angeles and Orange counties have been assigned much higher housing need as compared to prior cycles even though they generally have much less vacant land than inland areas.
The RHNA allocations assume that in many urbanized cities of Orange and Los Angeles counties, a significant portion of new housing needs will be met through the redevelopment of older commercial properties.
10. How will Placentia accommodate its new housing
needs assigned in the RHNA?
Placentia is fully developed and very little vacant land suitable for new housing is available. Therefore, the City's RHNA allocation must be satisfied through redevelopment of properties with potential for new housing or mixed use (i.e., a combination of housing and other uses on the same property). In recent years Placentia has adopted plans for the redevelopment of properties near downtown and the future Metrolink" station. The Housing Element update will identify a strategy for providing additional opportunities to accommodate the City's assigned housing need. 13 htto.Jlwinw.elacentia orq/705JMetral ink•Statlon•an d• Pa rkr re -strut tura August 2021 Page 6
A-13 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Table A-2: Online Survey Results
2021 Housing Element Survey
1.1f you leve In Placentia, how long have you lived here? 50 40
30 20
10 0
I do mol Ire less man l ye 1-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 wren 21 -yen Answers Count Percentage
1,20 net INS in Placentia 1 la%
Loss then 1 year O.
1-5 y001 106%
0-10 yema t'-01%
11-20 years 24 2e 24%
214 yew 50 59%
Answered e5 Skipped 0
2. How satlsned are you with your current housing situation? Answers
09ry$aes60.1
=omewloal Sateee3
Somewhat @ssa05103
001 Very Sa4s led
Revised Draft
Count
43 35
• Very Satisfied
a Somewhat Satisfied
• Sarnewhel Dissatisfied
Not Very Satisfied
Percentage
5050%
41 1e%
4 r1%
3 514
A-14 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
3.1f you live In Placentia, select the type of housing unit you reside In:
80 00
40 20
ad° 1 „a
40 Jae e
Answered: 05 Skipped. 0
Answers Count Percentage
Single Family Home 63 74 12%
Condominium 9 10 59%
Apanment 10 11 7668
ADU (also known as second unit or "Granny unit") 0 0%
Mobile Home 1 18%
Unsheltered 4 0%
I don't bva in Placentia a 0%
Other 1 18%
Answered. 04 Skipped. 1
4. Do you rent or own the home you live Ing
Answers
0060
Rent
Live wean other household- neither rent nor own
Revised Draft
Count
67 • Own
e Rent
Live with other
• household, neither lana
not 6006
Currently experiencing
homelessness
Percentage
78 32%
20%
118%
A-15 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Currently expenencing homelessness
Answered: 85 Skipped. 0
5.1r you reside in a single-family house, does the property have a second unluguest houselADU7 (if you answered No, sklp to question 7.) Answers Count
No
No
Yes
Percentage
76 8941%
Yes 1 18%
6. in this second unluguest houselADU occupied?
Answers
No
Yes
Count
No
o Yes
Answered:77 Skipped- 8
Percentage
18 62%
1 18%
Answered: 17 Skipped' 68
7. Please select the top reasons you choose to live or would like to live In Placentia. Check all that apply.
Revised Draft
A-16 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
60 sem..fllorAI
R 0 0` e o c ac
a.�� ci 56' e§ c'� cy
d � d pr a
d�a`ytl Qto} Q / c,e \bA
Answers Count Percentage
0ua lly of local school system 53 62 35%
Quality of home 33 38 62%
Quality mbiance of neighborhood 54 63 53%
Selety of neighborhood 52 61 18%
Prorimlty to PAs 31 36 47%
Pronrn8310 lamely 42 49 41%
Cleanliness of slreels and surroundings 34 40%
City services and programs 13 22 35%
Prrulm4y to shopping and services 38 44 71%
Prnrlmily In me14ra1 rano 30 35 29%
I do not want to Ina In Placentia $ 2 35%
Answered. 85 Skipped' 0
Maintaning the character of existing residential neighborhoods Answers
Very Imporlarl
5r+nr n l lK lrr pnrIgr 1
I1o1 Important
Revised Draft
Count
20 4
• Very Important
e Somewhat Important
• Not Important
Percentage
71 76%
23 53%
4 71%
A-17 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Ensuring that chlldem who grow up In Placentia can afford to live In Placentla.
Answers
Vary Important
Not Important
Count
60 14
10 Answered: 85 Skipped: 0
• Very Important
Somewhat Important
• Not Important
Percentage
10 59%
1647%
11 76%
Answered: 04 Skipped: 1
Ensuring that the housing market I Placentla provides a di verse range of housing types, Including townhomes, apartments, duplexltriplex, and condi • Very Important
- 4 1 Somewhat Important
• Not Important
Answers Count Percentage
Very Important 42 4941%
Somewhat Important 25 29 41%
Nol Important 18 21 18%
Answered: 85 Skipped: 0
Establishing special needs housing for senors. large families, veterans. andror persons with disabilities Revised Draft
A-18 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Answers
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Nol Important
Count
35 35
14 • Very Important
o Somewhat Important
• Not Important
Percentage
4110%
41 18%
1647%
Answered:84 Skipped: 1
Integrating affordable housing throughout the community to create mixed -income neighborhoods Answers
Very Important
Nol Important
Somewhat Imporlenl
Count
37 26
22 • Very Important
o Not Important
• Somewhat Important
Percentage
43 53%
30 59%
25 88%
Answered- 85 Skipped:0
Providing shelters and transltonat housing for the homeless. along with services to help move people into permanent housing Revised Draft
A-19 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Answers
Very Important
Somewhat Impodanl
Nol Impollant
Encouraging the rehabilitation of existing housing stock Answers
Very Important
Not Important
• Very Important
Somewhat Important
• Not Important
Count Percentage
32 37 65%
31 3647%
22 25 67%
Answered: 85 Skipped. 0
Count
51 27
6 Establishing programs to help abrlsk homeowners keep their homes Revised Draft
• Very Important
a Somewhat Important
• Not Important
Percentage
60%
31 76%
706%
Answered. 84 Skipped 1
A-20 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Answers
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Nol Important
• Very Important
Somewhat Important
• Not Important
Count Percentage
39 45 88%
34 40%
10 11 76%
Answered: 93 Skipped: 2
FairlEqultable house ng opportunities and programs to help maintain and secure neighborhoods 440
• Very Important
Somewhat lmpoltant
• Not Important
Answers Count Percentage
Very Important 40 47 06%
30 35 29%
Not Imponanl 12 I4 12%
Answered: e2 Skipped' 3
9. What type or housing do you mink Is most needed In the City or Placentia? Check all that apply.
Draft A-21 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
00 40
20 6 Sc
a c
Answers Count Percentage
Single-family houses 53 62 35%
Condominiums/Townhouses 30 35 29%
Apartments 11 12 9496
ADUs/Secondary Units or"Granny Flats" 17 20%
Senor Housing 21 24 71%
Housing iol persons with Drsab6lies 13 15 29%
Deed restricted affordable housing 14 16 47%
Answered: 79 Skipped: 6
10. What do you think are the most Important housing related Issues racing Placentia today? Check all that apply. 80 00
40 20
1 1,o` �a o°ark
M �� ,a 4'. v �a 061
Answers Count Percentage
Aflordabitly 62 72 94%
Lack of housing for large fomllles 7 05%
Lack of housing for smaller families 10 5996
Lack of deed reslncted affordable housing 10 11 7696
Not enough new housing development 10 1176%
Too much new housing development 25 29 41%
Process for building housing is loo burdensome 13 152996 Revised Draft A-22 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
Lack of support for renters 14 10 47%
[maka6u4gori1pr Iornanr 44 1e 1882%
Age of housing stock 19 22 35%
Annw.red.132 Skipped 3
11. What age range most accurately describes you?
35 30
25 20
16 10
0 Under 18
: 1
18-24 25-34
45-54 55-64 65+
Answers Count Percentage
Under 18 0 0%
18-24 0 0%
25-34 8 941%
35-44 22 25 88%
45-54 32 37 65%
55-64 15 17 65%
65+ 8 9 41%
Answered: 05 Skipped- 0
12. Are there any additional commentslsuggested goals that you would like to provide the City for Its 2021 Housing Element update? 11117011}
ia�riid+:. ,7„,11111.'iconincome people
parking
single housing
nueged. trarctC
01111113 fell
5[668
Sipa rtrrr eats
685/1110/015
5100
187111/095
SA 1411
high
apartment
ueiijhhorhaoil
Word Count
watet
Votha
hgll10 ..
1.000010
10 slow 1I101111
fna
Revised Draft A-23 March 2O22Qc r -,i-
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix A: Community Outreach
This page intentionally left blank
Revised Draft A-24 March 2022^ۥr -402T
ATTACHMENT2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
California Housing Element law mandates that each city show it has adequate sites available through appropriate zoning and development standards to accommodate a range of housing types and income levels. This appendix evaluates potential sites for additional housing development to accommodate the City's assigned need in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
Methodology for the Sites Inventory Analysis
The residential sites inventory is comprised of four components: 1) approved projects; 2) vacant sites; 3) underutilized (non -vacant) sites with potential for additional residential development or redevelopment; and potential accessory dwelling units (ADUs).
Based on the "default density" provisions of State law, vacant or underutilized sites of at least one-half acre that allow a density of at least 30 units/acre are considered suitable for housing in all income categories. Sites smaller than one-half acre and sites allowing multi -family or mixes -use at a density less than 30 units/acre are considered suitable for moderate- or above -moderate -income housing, while sites zoned for single -family -detached homes are assigned to the above -moderate category. For approved projects (Table B-2) income levels are based upon the actual or anticipated sales prices or rents.
Potential sites for residential development during the 2021-2029 planning period are summarized in Table B-1. As shown in this table, based on current zoning the capacity is not sufficient to fully accommodate the City's RHNA allocation in all income categories. Analysis supporting this finding is provided in the discussion below and in Tables B-2 through B-4. Prooratn HF -1..8 in the Housing Plan includes a commitment to identify and rezone sufficient sites to address this shortfall.
Table B-1: Residential Sites Summary
Income Category.
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above
Moderate
Total
Approved Projects (Table 8-2) 2524b, 774 1.026
Vacant Sites (Table 13-3) - - 3944% 6569 459
Underutilized Sites (Table B-4) 698786 404469 371257 247381 1.720 ADUs 14 24 17 1
Total Capacity 712898 680 782770 1.087172-28 3.196
RHNA 1,24334 680 7827-70 1,693 4.3913
Surplus (5hortfail) (531431) - (606165) (1.137)
Source: City of Placentia, 2021
Approved Projects
Table B-2 summarizes residential developments that have received some form of approval and will become available during the planning period. Three projects have been approved in the TOD district at densities ranging from 73 to 89 units/acre. One of these is a 100% low-income deed -restricted housing development (USA Properties, Figure B-1). These projects demonstrate that high-density residential Revised Draft
B-1 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
and mixed-use development is highly marketable in this area. All of the projects were built on underutilized sites formerly occupied by industrial and warehouse uses.
Table B-2: Approved Projects
Project/
Address
The Herald
110-132 E. Crowther Ave.
505, 515, 523, 531, 535 W.
Crowther Ave, 407 Goetz
Place, 409 Evelyn Place
USA Properties
207-209 W. Crowther Ave.
Santa Angelina
NE corner Angelina/Morse
455 S. Van Buren
Totals
Product Type
6 -story
multi -family
5 -story
mixed use
6 -story
mixed use
2 -story
multi-familv
Townhouse
Density
(units/ac)
72.9 82.9
88.7 16.9
25.0 Units by
Income Category
215
(market -rate)
418
(market -rate)
189
(187 deed -
restricted lower-
income)
65 (deed -restricted
senior low
income)
139
(market -rate)
252187 low
774 above -mod
Status/Notes
TOD district; redevelop-
ment of
industrial/warehouse; 95
du/ac max allowed (77%)
TOD district;
redevelopment of
industrial/warehouse; 95
du/ac max allowed (87%)
TOD district;
redevelopment of former
packing house; 95 du/ac
max allowed [93%)
Redevelopment of a
church campus. Zone
change from R1 to R3,
Redevelopment of under-
utilized and blighted non-
conforming automotive
dismantling yard.
Figure B-1: TOD Affordable Mixed -Use Project (207-209 W. Crowther Ave) Vacant Sites
Like many older communities in the Southern California metropolitan area, Placentia has minimal vacant land suitable for residential development. The majority of vacant land is within Specific Plan 7, bounded by Buena Vista Avenue to the north, Rose Drive to the west, Orangethorpe Avenue along the south, and the Van Buren Street to the east. Many of the vacant parcels are contiguous land areas too small to allow for construction. However, through lot consolidation these parcels have the potential to provide opportunities for new housing construction. Table B-3 shows vacant sites that are suitable for residential development. Based on the densities permitted in these areas, future units would be Revised Draft B-2 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
affordable to moderate- and above -moderate -income households. Due to high land values and the relatively low densities allowed ni less arcels it is exnected that future housing developments will seek near the maximwin allowable number of units on each site: however, the inventory shown in Table B-3 conservatively reflects a 10% reduction from the allowable number of units.
Underutilized Sites
Underutilized sites with potential for additional residential development or redevelopment are listed in Table B-4. The most significant opportunities for additional housing development are within the TOD and Old Town areas.
Recent real estate deo i pment trends in tie urban pogions of Orange and Los Angeles counties demonstrate the increasing market feasibility of multi -Family and mixed-use redevelopment at densities well above 30 units/acre. As discussed above. several projects have already been approved in the Placentia TOIJ area at densities un to 89 units/acre, The realistic yield estimated in Table B-4 for parcels in the TOD area is assumed to be 83 nit . t icl is t • : e • lens] I tree rece r 6'e is described above. in all other zonas the inventory conservatively reflects a 10% reduction from the allowable number of units for each site,
Accessory Dwelling Units
Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) represent a significant opportunity for affordable housing, particularly for single persons or small households including the elderly, college students, young adults, and caregivers. Recent changes in State law have made the construction of ADUs more feasible for homeowners, and Placentia has seen an increase in ADU development interest recently.
Over the past few years interest in ADUs has increased, and during 2018-2020 the City has approved 21 ADU permits. At that rate, it is estimated that approximately 56 additional ADUs will be approved during the 2021-2029 planning period. Based on recent analysis conducted by SCAG4 over two-thirds of future ADUs are expected to be affordable to lower-income households. The assumption of 7 ADUs per year is considered to be vein conservative given that In 2021 he City issued 9 ADU permits and in just the firj two months of 2022 there have been 13 ADU applications submitted.
Candidate Sites for Rezoning
As noted in Table B-1 above, the Sites inventory shows a shortfall of potential capacity for 531 lower- income units and 606 above-moderate-income_linits. The City has identified the following 2 -pronged strategy for addressing this shortfall:
L The existing TOD area is proposed to be expanded to the west, creating capacity for more than
1.100 multi-familv units. This area is currently zoned Mtrnufacturinn and encompasses approximately 14 acres. The potential capacity for this TOD expansion area assumes an. 4 SCAG, Regional Accessory Dwelliny i Init Affordability Analysis, 2020 (httns://scae.cayr217/a -,Efy ir,/files/file-
attachments/adu affordability analysis 120120v2.ndf?16068685273 Revised Draft
B-3 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
allowable density of 95 units/acre and an average yield of 82 units/acre based on recently approved prnj is in the existing TDD area.
2. The existing R-3 zoning district currently allows a maximum density of 25 units/acre. The City proposes to increase the maximum density in the R-3 district to 30 units/acre. While this zoning amendments would apply to all properties in the R-3 district. only the most likely sites for development are listed in Table B-5, With a conservative 10% reduction from the nronosed allowable density of 30 units/acre. these parcels would have a total capacity for approximately 363 units. an increase of 61 potentialsd.nits compared to the estimated capacity under current regulations.
Program 1.3 in the Housing Plan describes the actions necessary to implem nt this rezoning strategy.
Revised Draft
B-4 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Table B-3: Vacant Sites
r"FrA;41
1111111111111111 11111111111111111011111111
Natchez Ave/Erie St.
N. Placentia Ave/W..Palm
209 S. Walnut
_307 BAKER ST
323 BAKER ST
S. Walnut Ave/Baker St
S. Walnut Ave/Baker St
^230 W SANTA FE AVE
417 W. Crowther
adiacent to 413 W. Crowther
554 Vanderbilt Drive
548 Vanderbilt Drive
700 De Jesus Dr_
519 Langer Drive
J25 Lanaer Drive
531 Lanaer Drive
Lyons Way/Langer Drive
Powell/Ekenrode
Vina Del Mar/Puerto Nateles Dr.
BryceCir./Carlsbad St.
Vina del Mar/Jefferson St
_Olympic Ave
Yellowstone Ave.
Yellowstone Ave_
1150 Mammoth Circle
_1150 Mammoth Circle
Hialand/ Orachard
Oranaethoroe/Richfield
1255 Vina Del Mar
prang ethoroe/Jeff a rson
OrchardNan Buren
Cherry/Van Buren
17272 Cherry
Revised Draft
336-520-26. Medium Density PUD 15 0.22 Yes 2 2
337-241-63 Medium Density RR -11 15 0.14 Yes 1 1
339-361-05 Medium Density R-2 15 0.07 Yes 1 1
339-392-14 OT OT 65 0.24 No 13 13
339-392-19 OT OT 65 0.15 No 8 8
339-392-20 Medium Density R-22 15 0.15 Yes 2 2
339-392-21 Medium Density. RR -22 15 0.10 Yes 1 1
339-393-01 OT OT 29 0.13 No 3 3
339-401-03 TOD. TOD 9.. 0.09 No 7 7
339-401-05 TOD . TOD 95 0.01 No 1 1
340-401-28 Low Density R-1 6 0.16 Yes 1 1
340-401-29 Low Density R-1 6 0.17 Yes 1 1
340-461-13 Low Density PUD 6 0 22 Yes 1 1
340-462-13 Low Density PUD 6 0.13. Yes, 1 1
340-462-14 Low Density PUD 6 0.11 Yes 1 1
340-462-15 Low Density PUD 6 0.12 Yes 1 1
340-462-16 Low Density PUD 6 1.21 Yes 6 6
340-511-66 Low Density .. RPC 6 0.26 I. 1 1
341-022-10 Low Density RR -11 6 0.47 Yes 2 2
. 341-042-39 Low Density R-11 6 0.37. Yes 1 1
341-042-43 Low Density R-1 6 0.38 Yes 2 2
341-081-34 Low Density RR=1 6 0.22 1 1
341-081-36 Low Density, R-1. 6 .0.34. Yes. 1 1
341-082-02 Low Density R-1 .6 0.55 Yes_ 2 2
341-093-02 Low Density R-1. .6 0.23 Yes 1 1
341-093-03 .Low Density. R-1 6 0.24 Yes 1 1
. 341-122-83 Medium Density PUD 15 1.13 Yes 15 15
341-122-89 Medium Density PUD 15. 1.45 Yes. 19 19
341-201-35 Low Density R-1 6 0.49 Yes 2 2
341-343-10 Low Density SP -7 6 0.18 Yes 1 1
341-352-10 Medium Density SP -7 15 0.23 Yes 3 3
341.352-15 .Low Density. SP -7. 6 0.17 Yes 1 1
341-354-01 Low Density SP -7 6 0.18 Yes 1 1
B-5 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
. 17262 Cherry
N. Van Buren/Orchard
N. Van Buren/Orchard.
Willow St.Nan Buren
Willow St./Van Buren
6200 Van Buren
_6200 Van Buren
_Cherry St./Van Buren
Cherry St./Depot St.
_Cherry St.Nan Buren
502 Gerhold Lane
1451 Howard PI
_406 Nevin Lane
_Alta VistaNan Buren
_164 Los Alamitos Cir.
OrchardiRiehfield
.OrchardIS. Caliente Wav
.-Orchard/S. Caliente Wav
Orchard/S. Caliente Wav
Orchard/Richfield
Vincente/Maria Ave
Vincente/Maria Ave
Orannethorpe/Jefferson
OraneethoroefJefferson
503 S. Van Buren St.
560 S Van Buren
_17000 L Paloma
La Paloma/Van Buren
._La Paloma/Van Buren.
_17000 La Paloma
17342 Atwood Ave
Atwood/Van Buren
AtwoodNan Buren
Atwood/Van Buren
AtwoodNan Buren
019117,44
1•
:Max Density Acres 1 2 per. Lower Mod A ove ' Total 1
duiac cycles? 1 Mod Units
341-354-02 Low Density SP -7 6 0.26 Yes 1 1
341-361-01 Low Density PUD 6 0.96 Yes 5 5
341-361-02 Low Density SP -7 6 0.40 Yes 2 2
341-362-01 Medium Density SP -7 15 0.08 Yes 1 1
341-362-02 Medium Density SP -7 15 0.69 Yes 9 9
341-365-02 Low Density. SP -7. 6 0.14 Yes 1 1
341-365-03Low Density SP -7 6 0.15 Yes 1 1
341-374-01 Medium Density R"G, 15 0.26, Yes 3 3
341-375-01 Medium Density R. 15 0.30 Yes 4 4
341-375-02 Medium Density RJG 15 0.22 Yes 3 3
341-421-33 Low Density SP -7 6 0.41 Yes 2, 2
341-431-01 Low Density SP -7 6 0.44 Yes 2 2
341-433-23 Low Density SP -7 6 0.48 Yes 2 2
341-481-28 Medium Density SP -7 15 1.00 Yes 13 13
343-682-24 Medium Density PUD 15 0.11 Yes. 1 1
343-712-03 Medium Density PUD 15 0.42 Yes 5 5
343-712-47 Medium Density PUD 15 0.05 Yes 1 1
343-712-48 Medium Density PUD 15 11,13 Yes 1 1
343-712-49 Medium Density PUD 15 0.03 Yes 1 1
343-712-69 Medium Densitv PUD. 15. 0.04. Yes 1 1
346-013-02 Low Density R-1. 6 0.12 1 1
346-013-03 Low Density R-1. 6 0.13 1 1
346-162-01 HDR RR=3 25 0.47 No 10 10
346-162-02 HDR R-3 25 4.55 No 102 102
346-164-23 HDR R-3 25 0.21 No 4 4
346-171-01 Low Density R-1 6 0.65 Yes, 3 3
346-172-24 Low Density R-1 6 0.26 Yes 1 1
346-172-26 Low Density R=1 6 0.09 Yes 1 1
346-172-27 Low Densit R-1 6 0.09 Yes 1 1
346-173-01 Low Density R-1 6 0.20 Yes 1 1
346-181-02 Low Density R-1- 6 12 Yes 1 1
346-181-11 Low Density R-1 6 0.09 Yes 1 1
346-181-12 Low Density R-1 6 0.19 -Yes 1 1
346-181-13 Low Density R-1 6 0.09 -Yes 1 . 1
346-181-14 Low Density R-1 6 0.14 Yes 1 1_
Revisedi_Draft B-6 March 202/October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
.Atwood/Lincoln
Atwood/Lincoln
TAtwood/Lincoln.
Atwood/Lincoln
17431 Oak St
601 S. Lakeview Ave_
Lakeview LoopNeterans Way
625 S. Lakeview Ave.
2006 E. Lakeview Loop
2018 E. Lakeview L000
613 S. Lakeview Ave_
1958 E. Veterans Way
Totals
Mod i Abo�te ]
01 R-1 1 1
R-1 1 1
R-1 1 1
R-1 1 1
R-1 1 1
R-3 102 102
F. 2 2
R-3 12 12
11 8 8
R-3 8 8 ,
R-3 10 10
18 18
394 65 459
346-181-16 Low Density
346-181-17 Low Density
346-181-18 Low Density
346-181-19 Low Density
346-181-21 Low Density
346-331-02 HDR
346-331-03 . HDR
346-331-11 HDR
346-331-27 HDR
346-331-29 HDR
346-331-30 HDR
346-331-32 HDR
Sife6 fteBb
336 520 25
337 241 63
339 361 05
339 392 20
1310 19.2 21
311 122 83
311 122 8a
311 352 10
311 362 01
311 362 02
311 371 01
311 375 01
311 375 02
311 181 28
313 712 47
313 71218
313 712 49
313 712 69
Reviled Draft
Natchez Ave/Eric St
N. Placentia Ave/W. Palm
209 S. Walnut
S. Walnut Ave/Baker St
S. Walnut Ave/Baker St
Highland/ Orchard
Orangethorpe/Richfield
Orchard/Van Buren
Willow St./Van Buren
Willow St./Van Buren
Cherry St./Van Buren
Cherry St./Depot St.
Cherry St./Van Buren
Alta Vista/Van Buren
Orchard/S. Caliente Way
Orchard/S. Caliente Way
Orchard/S. Caliente Way
Orchard/Richfield
042
0.11 0.07
0,1-5
0.10 1.13
1.15 043
0.08 09
0.26 0-30
0:22
1.00 0.05
0,1-3
0.03 0.01
6 0.10. YI
6 0.10 Yea
6 0.09 Yes
0.09 Yes
6 0.09 Yes
25 4.55 No
25 0.13 No
25 0.53 No
25 0.38 No
25 0.39 No
25 0.45 No
25 0.81 No
31.9 Gefteral-Plan
Med k Ajolk
MediNm C`onoit'•- PUD 45
McdWm C`cncit\ - R 1 . 1-5
Medium Density R 2 45
Medium Density R 2 45
Medium Densit.4 R 2 45
Medium Density PUD 45
Medium Posits- PUD 1-5-
Medium
6Medium Density SP -7 1-5
Medium Density SP -7 4-5
Medium Density SP -7 48
Medium Density R -G 45
Medium Density R G 4-5
Medium Density R G 45
Medium Density 45
Medium Density PUD 45
Medium Density PUD 45
Medium Density PUD 45
Medium Density PUD 1-5
3 2
4 2
4 47
24 3
4-
1-0
3 4
3 4-5
4 4
4 4
3 2
4 2
4 4;
24 3
4 40
3 4
3 45
4 4
4 4
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
B-7 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
313 682 21
313 712 03
310 161 13
310 511 66
341 022 10
341 012 30
341 012 13
311 081 31
341 081 36
311 082-02
341 093 02
311 093 03
311 201 35
311 313 10
311 352 15
311 351 01
311 351 02
311 361 01
311 361 02
341 121 33
311 431 01
311 133 23
316 171 01
346 172 21
346 173 01
310 101 28
310 101 20
310 162 13
310-162 14
310162 15
340162 16
311 365 02
311 365 03
316 013 02
316 013 03
Revised Draft
161 Los Alamitos Cir.
Orchard/Richfield
700 De Jesus Dr.
PowcII/Ekcnrodc
Vina Del Mar.!Pucrty NcitmIe
Bryce Cir./Carlsbad St.
Vino del Mar/Jefferson St
Olympic Ave
Yellowstone Ave.
Yellowstone Ave.
1150 Mammoth Circle
1150 Mammoth Circle
1255 Vino Dcl Mar
O rangcthorpc/Jefferson
Cherry/Van Buren
17272 Cherry
17262 Cherry
N. Van Buren/Orchard
N. Van Buren/Orchard
502 Gcrhold Lanc
1151 Howard PI
406 Nevin Lanc
560 S Van Buren
17000 L Paloma
17000 La Paloma
551 Vanderbilt Drive
518 Vanderbilt Drive
519 Langer Drivc
525 Langer Drivc
531 Langer Drive
Lyons Way/Langer Drive
6200 Van Buren
6200 Van Buren
Vinccntc/Maria Ave
VincentelMaria Ave
0-14
042
0,22
0.26 0.17
0 0.38
0.22 0.31
0.55 023
0,24
0.19 0.18
0.18 0.26
0.96 0.10
0.41 0.11
0-48-
0.65 -480.65
0.26 0.24
0.16 0
0.13 04-1-
042
1.21 0-14
0-45
0-14
04-3
Plan+ g � ) 6ewtai ithed filed A 1Ja#hs I -
Medium Dencity
Modi►m CL�na�1'
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Dencity
Low Density
Low Dencity
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Dcnsity
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Dencity
Low Dencity
Low Dencity
Low Density
Low Density
Low Dencity
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Dencity
Low Der sib/
Low Dercity
Low Der city
Low Der city
Low Der city
Low Dcr city
Low Der city
PUD
PUD
PUD
RPG
R4
R1
R1
R1
R1
R4
R1
R1
SR-;
S
coo_
SP-;
PUD
SR-;
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
PUD
PUD
PUD
PUD
S
R1
p4
45 1-5
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 1-
4 6
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vasa -0
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
B-8 March 202.20ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
346 172 26
346 172 27
316 181 02
316 181 11
316 181 12
316 181 13
316 181 11
316 181 16
316 181 17
346 181 18
316 181 19
316 181 21
339 101 03
339 101 05
339 394 07
339 391 06-
339
6339 392 11
339 394 01
339 061 07
339 365 18
770 16i 11
339 365 10
339 365 27
33944545
339 392 19
339 393 02
339 361 16
339 365 09
339 393 01
339 361 12
339 052 28
339oo9-052 29
339 355 17
339 392 10
710 192 11
Revised Draft
La Paloma/Van Buren
La Paloma/Van Buren
17312 Atwood Ave
Atwood/Van Buren
Atwood/Van Buren
Atwood/Van Burer-
Atwood/Van Buren
Atwood/Lincoln
Atwood/Lincoln
Atwood/Lincoln
Atwood/Lincoln
17131 Oak St
417 W. Crowther
adjacent to 113 W. Crowther
100 W SANTA FE AVE
110 W SANTA FE AVE
307 BAKER ST
132 W SANTA FE AVE
231 S BRADFORD AVE
219 1/2 S BRADFORD AVE
115 S BRADFORD AVE
111 W SANTA FE AVE
Came earceI above
235 S BRADFORD AVE
323 BAKER ST
226 W SANTA FE AVE
203 W SANTA FE AVE
231 S MAIN ST
230 W SANTA FE AVE
221 W SANTA FE AVE
120 S BRADFORD AVE
120 S BRADFORD AVE
121 S BRADFORD AVE
311 W SANTA FE AVE
310 W SANTA FE AVE
0-09
0.09 0.06
0.04 04-9
0,09
044
0.10 0.10
0.09 0.09
0-09
0.09 0.01
0.07 095
0-24
0.09 0.17
045
0.29 0.31
0.31 0.09
05 0.06
0.09 0.09
0,14
0.05 0-25
0.20 0.15
0.01 0.07
I Allowable Above Total
�tiasl _141145;-±-'"-t-1-51-911-4.6
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Dcnsity
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
Low Density
TOD
TOD
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
# -4
R1
TOD
TOD
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
95 95
29 29
65 29
29 29
35 29
VVVVVVBVVVV
1- 4 Vacant
1- 1- Vacant
1- 4 Vacant
4 1- Vacant
1- 1- Vacant
4- 1- Vacant
1- 4 vacant
1 Vacant
4 4- Vacant
1- 4 Vacant
4 1- Vacant
4 1- Vacant
8 8 Vacant
4- 4 1 Vacant
2 2 Parking Lot
4 4- Parking Lot
1-5 1-5 Vacant
2 2
4 4 Parking. Lot
4 4
10 10
9 9
4 1-
2 2 2 Parking Lot
9 9 Vacant
4 4
2 2
2 2
3 3 Vacant
4 1-
4 6 6
5 5 Parking Lot
4- 4-
2 2 2
B_9 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Eli=geVra•itgalli,nemPlan ras) . s<c+%4=1=1111111
J _ 1
339 363 12
339-363-3
346 331 32
346 331 27
346 331 24
346 331 02
346 331 30
346 331 11
316 331 03
316 164 23
346 162 02
346 162 01
333 W SANTA FE AVE 0,06- 9T OT 35 212 Parking Lot
329 W SANTA FE AVE 095 QT OT 35 2 2 Parking Lot
1958 E. Veterans Way 0:8- HDR R-3 25 20 20 Vacant
2006 E. Lakeview Loop 0.38 HDR R 3 25 9 9 Vacant
2018 E. Lakeview Loep 049 141DR R4 25 9 8 Vacant
601 S. Lakeview Ave. 4.55 140R R-3 25 113 113 Vacant
Eli C. Lakeview Ave. 0,45 #BR R 3 25 14 14 Vacant
Rai C. 6,ikevicw Ave. 0.53 HDR R 3 25 4-3 1-3 Vacant
Lakeview Loop/Veterans Way 0.13 kkBR R-3 25 3 3 Vacant
503 S. Van Buren St. 0.21 1 BR R 3 25 5 5 Vacant
OrangethorpelJefferson 4.55 Irl -DR- R 3 25 113 14a Vacant OrangethorpclJcffcrcon 0.47 148E F4-3 25 14 44 Vacant
0 496 69 573
Revise Draft B-10 March 2072October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Table 8-4: Underutilized Sites
343-691-06 .Orchard/Highland.
339-401-16 Crowther/Melrose
1 Allowable
Acres Generali Zoning
PI_an
4-13 MDR R -G
Density
Llacl
15 16
Exlstinq Lower
Units
3.24 TOD TOD 95
339-401-01 425 W. Crowther 0.06 TOD TOD 95 1
339-401-02 421 W Crowther 0.11 TOD TOD 95 1
339-401-06 415 Goetz Place 0.14 TOD TOD 95 1
339-401-07 411 Goetz Place 0.06 TOD TOD 95 1
339-401-10 408 Goetz Place 0.13 TOD TOD 95 3
339-401-13 .409 W. Crowther 0.09 TOD TOD 95 1
339-063-01- 101 E. Crowther 0.6 TOD TOD- 95
339-063-02 125 E. Crowther 0.25 TOD TOD 95
339-402-15 Crowther 0.1 .TOD TOD 95
339-401-14 405 W. Crowther 0.1 TOD TOD 95
339-401-11 417 Evelyn Place 0.13 TOD TOD 95
339-401-12 adiacent to 417 Evelyn Place 0.13 TOD TOD 95 339-401-04 Crowther/Goetz. 0.08 TOD TOD 95
.339-431-01_551 W. Crowther 1.35 TOD TOD 95
339-402-04 Crowther/Pedestrian Bridge TOD TOD 95
339-091-20 190 W. Crowther 5.91 TOD TOD 25
339-401-15 CrowtherlEvelyn 0.13 TOD TOD 95
339-394-05116 W SANTA FE AVE #B 0.05 OT OT 29
4 339-394-0118 W SANTA FE AVE #A13 0,06- .0T OT, 29
339-394-03 126 W SANTA FE AVE 0.14 OT OT 29
.339-365-26_101 W SANTA FE AVE 0.11 OT OT 29
0 339-364-1233 W SANTA FE AVE 0.14 OT OT -29
339-365-08 232 S MAIN ST 0.13 OT OT 29
339-365-17 225 S BRAFORO AVE 0.15 OT OT 29
339-061-05_220 S BRADFORD AVE 0.26 OT OT 29
339-362-05 23,3.S WALNUT AVE 0.15 OT OT 29
_339-365-21 ..209 S BRADFORD AVE 0.15 OT OT 29.
339-061-02 206 S BRADFORD AVE 0.15 OT OT 2
339-394-02 128 W SANTA FE AVE 0.17 OT OT 29
_339-394-01 132 W SANTA FE AVE 0.09 OT OT 29
339-365-25 109 W SANTA FE AVE 0.17 OT OT 29
339-365-03 210 S MAIN ST 0.15 OT OT 29
_339-061-01 . 204 S BRADFORD AVE 0.14 OT OT 29
,.339-365-22 205 S BRADFORD AVE 0.15 OT OT 29
Revised.Draft
268
49 112
490
Mod I Above
Total
39 - -
3 8
10 3
7 6
20 8
7 10
10 5
10 1
3 2
3 2
6 2
2 2
4 2
4 3
3 3
Net
55 39-
268 268
4 3
9 8
16 Units
Packing House
Residential. Sinale Family Home
Residential Sinale Family Home
lor I
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
11 10 Residential. Single Family Home
4 3 Residential Single Family Home
10 7 Residential, 3 units
7 6 Residential. Single Family Home
49 49 Parkina Lot
2D 20 Parkina Lot
8 Parkina Lot
8 7 Residential. Single Family Home
10 10 oarkina lot utilized by surrounding residential . 10 10 oarkina lot utilized by surroundina residential
6 5 SF home
112 112 Tyler Liahtina - Industrial building
0 0 Golden State Water Well
490 490 Industrial Buildina
10 10
1 1
1 1
3 3
2 2
3 3
3 6
3 4
2 3
3 2
6 2
2 2
4 4. 4
3 3
3 3
3 3
Office
Restaurant
Retail
Restaurant
Glass Reoair Shoo
Residential, Multi -family
Residential. Single Family Home
Restaurant
Residential. Single Family Home
Residential. Single Family Home
Residential, Single Family Home
.Existina Use, Commercial
Existina Use. Commercial
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Multi -family
Residential, Condo
Residential. Multi -family
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
B_1 1 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Allowable
1 General Existinct1
Street Address Acres Zoning Qensity. Lower 1 Mod
Plan (dulacl Units
39-365-07 226 S MAIN ST _0.15 OT OT 29 3
339-365-18 219 1/2 S BRADFORD AVE. 0.15 OT OT 29 2
339-355-11_144 S MAIN ST 0.1 OT OT 35 2
339-355-13 145 S BRADFORD AVE 0.29 OT OT .35 1. 8
_339-365-10141 W SANTA FE AVE 0.34 OT OT 29 8
339-365-27 Same parcel as above 0.34 OT OT 29
339-061-06 228 S BRADFORD AVE 0.15 OT OT 29 3
_339-365-06 224 S MAIN ST 0.15 OT OT 29 1 2
339-355-10 140 S MAIN ST 0.15 OT OT 35 1 - 3
_339-355-14 137 S BRADFORD AVE 0.15 OT OT 35 4
339-052-27. 132 S BRADFORD AVE 0.31 OT OT 35 _ - 9
339-365-19 217 S BRADFORD AVE 0.12 OT OT 29 3
339-061-04 214 S BRADFORD AVE 0.28 OT OT 29 - 7
339-365-05 218 S MAIN ST 0.15 OT OT 29 1 2
339-365-02 206 S MAIN ST 0.15 OT OT 29 1 2
339-365-23201 S BRADFORD AVE 0.12 OT OT 29 3
339-365-01 202 S MAIN ST 0.15 OT OT 29 1 2
339-052-26 144 S BRADFORD AVE 0.31 OT OT 35 9
339-392-13_313 S MELROSE ST 0.06 OT OT 65 1 2
339-392-16 311 BAKER ST 11.15 OT OT 65 .1 7
339.391.15 312 BAKER ST 0.27 OT OT 65 1 14
339-391-14 314 BAKER ST 0.14 OT OT 65 1 7
339-391-13 320 BAKER ST 0.16 OT OT 65 1 8
339-393-08 , 202 W SANTA FE AVE 0.13 OT OT 29 3
339-393-07 214 W SANTA FE AVE OT OT 29 1
339-392-17 315 BAKER ST 0.15 OT OT 65 1 7
339-393-06 216 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT 29 1
339-393-05 220 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT 29 _ 1
339-392-18 319 BAKER ST 0.15 OT 0T 65 1 7
339-393-04 222 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT 29 1
339-393-03 . 224 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT 29 1
339-393-02 226 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT .29 1
339-364-16 203 W SANTA FE AVE 0.09 OT OT 29 2
339-364-15 209 W SANTA FE AVE 0,05 OT 01- 29 1
339-364-13 215 W SANTA FE AVE 0.05 OT OT 29 1.
339-365-09 234 S MAIN ST 0.09 OT OT 29 1 1
339-391.12 322 BAKER ST 0.16 OT OT _ 65 9
Revised Draft
Above 1 !riot
Total I Net ExistlgcjUse Planning
Period2 .
3 3 Residential. Multi -family No
3 2 Existing Use, SF Home No
3 2 Residential, Single Family Home No
9 8 .Existinq Use, SF Home No
8 Existing Use, Commercial No
8 8 Existina Use Commercial No
3 3 . Existing Use- American Legion No
32 Residential. Single Family Home No
4 ' Residential. Single Family Home No
4 4 Existing Use- Commercial No
9 9 Existing Use- Commercial No
3 3 Existing Use- Commercial No
7 7 Existing Use- Commercial No
3 2 Residential Single Family Home No
3 2 Residential. Single Family Home No
3 3 Existing Use- Restaurant No
3 2 Residential, Single Family Home No
9 9 Existing Use- Commercial No
3 2 Residential Single Family Home No
8 7 Residential, Single Family Hame, No
15 14 Residential. Single Family Home No
8 7 Residential. Single Family Home No.
9 8 Residential. Single Family Home No
3 3 Existing Use- Commercial No
1 1 Existina Use- Restaurant No
8 7 Residential. Single Family Home No
1 1 Existina Use- Commercial No
1 1 Existing Use- Commercial No
8 7 Residential. Single Family Home No
1 _ 1 Existing Use- Commercial No
1 1 Existing Use- Commercial No
1 1 Existing Use. Commercial No
2 2 Existing Use, Commercial No
1 1 Existing Use- Commercial No
1 1 Existing Use- Commercial No
2 1. Existing Use, SF Home No
9 9 Residential. Multi -family No
B-12 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Allowable !
General E
S xis
Plan tonin OenDent/tingUnits
- , dal c
3397391-11 326 BAKER ST 0.16 OT OT 65
339-391-10 332 BAKER ST 0.16 OT OT 65 1
.339-391-09 334 BAKER ST 0.16 OT OT 65 1
339-061-08 238 S BRADFORD AVE 0.18 OT OT 29
339-364-12 221 W SANTA FE AVE 0.05 OT OT 29
339-365-16 :229 S BRADFORD AVE 0.13 29 1
339-364-11 229 W SANTA FE AVE. 0.09 29
339-362-06 239 S WALNUT AVE 0.18 35 1
339-365-20 211 S BRADFORD AVE 0.15 OT 29 1
339-061-03 200 S BRADFORD AVE 0.15 OT 29
339-365-04_216 S MAIN ST 0,15 OT 29 1
339-355-09 134 S MAIN ST 0.15 OT 35 1
339-355-15 131 S BRADFORD AVE 0.15 OT 35
339-052-28_120 S BRADFORD AVE 0.2 OT 35
)39-052-29 120 S BRADFORD AVE
339-355-08_132 S MAIN ST
339-355-16 125 S BRADFORD AVE
339-355-07 126 S MAIN ST #A
339-052-24 110 S BRADFORD AVE
339-355-06 122 S MAIN ST
_339-355-18 117 S BRADFORD AVE
339-355-05 118 S MAIN ST
339-355-19 113 S BRADFORD AVE
339-355-04 114 S MAIN ST
339.052-211102 S BRADFORD AVE
339-355-03 110 S MAIN ST
339-355-20 100 W CHAPMAN AVE
OT OT
OT OT
OT OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
0.2 OT 0135
0.15 OT
0.15 OT
0_15 OT OT.
0.22 OT OT
0.15 OT OT
0.12 OT OT
0.15 OT OT
0.15 OT OT
OT 35
OT 35
35 35
35 35
35 35
1 1
0.15 OT OT 35
1.81 OT OT 56
0.15 OT OT 35
0.32 OT OT 35
339 355-02_106 S MAIN ST 0.15 OT OT 35
339-355-22 CHAPMAN/MAIN ' 0.13 OT OT 35
339-392-02 350 W SANTA FE AVE 0.14 OT OT 35
339-392-01 _352 W SANTA FE AVE 0.14 OT OT 35
339-392-22 320 S WALNUT AVE 0.1 OT OT 65
39-3-92-123399-33595;002-133020625
2-12305 S MELROSE ST 0.11 OT OT 35
339-392-04 338 W SANTA FE AVE 006 OT OT 35
339-392-07 330 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT 35
39-392-D 322 W SANTA FE AVE 0.11 OT OT 35
339-392-08 326 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT 35
Revised Draft
1 Above t Prior
Lower Mod Total Net I Existing Use Planning
Mod
Period?
9 9 9 Residential. Multi -family No
8 9 8 Residential, Single Family Home No
8 9 8 Residential. Sinale Family Home No
4 4 4 Existing Use- Commercial No
1 1 1 Existina Use. Commercial No
2 3 2 Residential. Single Family Home No
2 2 2 Existina Use- Commercial No
4 _ 5 4 Residential. Sinole Family Home No f
2 _ 3 2 Residential, Sinale Family Home No
_H
3 3 3 Existina Use- Commercial No
2 3 2 Residential, Sinale Family Home No
3 4 3 Residential. Single Family Home No
4 4 4 Existina Use- Commercial No
6 6 6 Existing Use, Residential No
6 6 6 Existina Use. Residential No_
4 3 Residential Sinale Family Home No
4 4 4 Existina Use- Commercial No
3 4 3 Residential. Single Family Home. No
6 6 6 Existina Use- Commercial No
3 4 3 Residential. Single Family Home No
3 - 3 3 Existina Use- Commercial .N.9._
3 4 3 Residential, Sinale Family Home No
3 4 3 Residential. Single Family Home No
3 4 3 Residential, Single Family Home No
89 89 89 Existing Use- Church No
3 4 3 Residential. Single Family Home No
. 10. 10 10 Existing Use- Commercial No
3 _ 4 3 Residential Simile Family Home No
4 4 4 Placentia Water Tower No ,
3 _ 4 3 Residentiat, Simile Family Home No
3_ 4 3 Residential, Single Family Home No
5 5 5 Existing Use- Commercial No
3 3 3 Existina Use- Commerr ial No
1 1 1 Residential, Multi -family No
1 1 1 Existing Use- Commercial No
3 3 3 .Existina Use- Commercial. No
1 _ 1 1 Existing Use- Commercial No
B-13 March 202ZOctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
1I I Allowable
General
1 MI Acres Plan Lan1n wens
jti1acl
3 9-392-10 .314 W SANTA FF AVF. 0 04 y �OT OT 35
339-392-11 310 W SANTA FE AVE 0.07 OT OT 35
339-363-09232 S WALNUT AVE, 0.15 OT OT 35
_339-363-10 349 W SANTA FE AVE 0.15 OT OT 35
339-363-19 301 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT 35
339-363-11 341 W SANTA FE AVE 0.17 OT OT 35
339-363-29 325 W SANTA FE AVE 0.11 OT OT 35
_339-383-18 307 W SANTA FE AVE 0.11 OT OT 35
339-391-16 400 BAKER ST 1.61 OT OT 65
_339-391-16 400 BAKER ST 0,16 OT OT 65
339-391-06 321 S WALNUT AVE. 0.14 OT OT 65
339-391-01 412 W SANTA FE AVE 0.13 OT OT 35
339-391-02 307 S WALNUT AVE 0.13 OT OT 35
339-391-03 311 S WALNUT AVE 0.13 OT OT 35
339-391-04 315 S WALNUT AVE 0.13 OT OT 65
339-391-05 319 S WALNUT AVE 0.14 OT OT 65
_346-331-07 1952 E. Veterans Way 0.78 HDR R-3 25
346-164-24_513 S. Van Buren St. 0 17 HDR R-3 25
339-052-28 120 S BRADFORD AVE 0-20 OT OT 35
339-052-29 120 S BRADFORD AVE 0.20 OT OT 35
_339-061-07 234 S BRADFORD AVE 0.17 OT OT 29
339-355-13 145 S BRADFORD AVE 0.29 OT OT 35
339-355-17 121 S BRADFORD AVE 0.15 OT. OT 35
_339-363-12 333 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT 35.
339-363-13 329 W SANTA FE AVE 0.06 OT OT 35
339.364-12 221 W SANTA FE AVE 0.05 OT OT 29
339-364-16 203 W SANTA FE AVE 0 09 OT OT 29
339-365-09 234 S MAIN ST 0.09 OT OT 29
_339-365-10 141 W SANTA FE AVE 0.34 OT OT 29
339-365-15 235 S BRADFORD AVE 0.09 OT OT 29
339-365.18 219 1/2 S BRADFORD AVE. 0.15 OT OT 29
_
_339-392-10 314 W SANTA FE AVE 0 04 OT OT 35
339-392-11 310 W SANTA FE AVE 0 07 OT OT 35
_339-393-02 27f W SANTA FE AVE 0 06 OT OT 29
339-394.01 132 W SANTA FE AVE 0.09 OT OT 29
339-394-06_110 W SANTA FE AVE 0.05 OT OT 29
7 339-394-0100 W SANTA FE AVE 0.07 OT OT 29
xis g Lower
Units
Mod Above
Mod
Total 1 Net
Prior
Existing Use PriPteri od%
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
1 1 1 Existina Use. Residential
2 2 2 Existina Use. Residential
3 4 3 Residential, Single Family Home
4 4 4 Residential Multi -family
1 1 1 Existinq Use- Commercial
1 4 5 4 Residential. Sinale Family Home
1 2 3 2 Residential. Sinale Family Home
3 3 3 Residential. Multi -family
94 94 94 Residential. Apartment
9 9 9. Residential. Apartment
8 _ 8 8 Residential, Multi -family
1 3 4 3 _ Residential. Single Family Home
1 3 - 4 3 Residential. Sinale Family Home
4 4 4 Residential, Multi -family
1 6_ 7 6 Residential. Single Family Home
1 7 8 7 Residential. Sinale Family Home
17 17 17 industrial
1 2 3 2 house
6 6 Commercial
6 6 6 Commercial
4 4 4 Parking lot
9 2 9 Commercial
4 4 4 Parkina lot
1 1 1 Parkina Lot
1 1 1 Parkina Lot
1 1 1 Commercial
2 2 2 Commercial
2 2 2 Commercial
8 8 8 . Commercial
2 2 2 Parkina Lot
3 3 3 Commercial.
1 1 1 Commercial.
2 2 2 Commercial
1 1 1 Commercial
2 2 2 Commercial
1 1 1 Parkina Lot
1 1 1 Parking Lot
Revised Draft B-14 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
APN
Allowable
Existing
Street Addt s Acres Plan
General Zoning Density units
_ dohs
1 38.4 ( 71 1
Lower Mod Mode Total
02 618 0 1,791
Net
1.720
]mist np Use
Prior
Planning
Period?
APN
Strea=-Address AGAas
Allowable
Ger+sfal Plaeg 6swef Mod
Ato-ve Het
Med
;drag-Vse
339 361 18
343-644-44
316 181 21
339-491-46
339 101 01
339-404-62
33944444
339-40447
339 101 10
339 101 13
339 063 01
339 063 02
339-402-15
339-404-44
339-484-44
339 401 12
339-491-04
33943141
339-402114
339
339-10445
33949445
1 339 394 04
33449443
33446544
339-364-10
339-365-03
339 365 17
Revised Draft
229 S. Main St
Orchard 1Hiphland
17131 Oak St
Srowttrer!Mekese
425 W. Crowther
421 W. Crowther
415 Gootz Place
411 Goetz Placo
408--GGeetz-Plase
409-W. Crowther
101 E. Crowther
125 E. Crowther
Crowther
495 -01 -Crowther
417 Evolyn Place
adiaam1.V 1117 iirctia
Place
Crowther/Geetz
551 W. Crowther
Crowther Red„ctrian
Bridge
490-W. CFowthor
Crswtherl€velvn
116WSANTA FEAVE 11B
118 W SANTA FE AVE
#A1,3
126 W SANTA FE AVE
101 W SANTA FE AVE
233 W SANTA FE AVE
232 S MAIN ST
225 S BRADFORD AVE
Me Density
4.13 Meii� :Lents
909 hewLIDefloity
3.21 TOD
0:06 TOD
0.11 TOD
944 TOD
046 TOD
0.13 TOD
8-89 TOD
8-60 TOD
0-25 TOD
9-4-0 TOD
040 TOD
0.13 TOD
043 TOD
9-88 TOD
1.35 TOD
TOD
5.91 TOO
0.13 TOD
0-05 0T
046 0T
0.11 GT
0.11 GT
0:44 GT
0.13 GT
0.15 GT
TOD
TOD
TOD
TOD
TOD
TOD
0T
OT
0T
0T
OT
0T
07 B-15
45 45
6 95
95 95
95 95
95 95
95 95
95 95
95 95
95 95
95 95
95 29
29 29
29 29
29 29
307
56 128
561
2 46
4 9
4-2
4 9
7 23
9 8
0 9
4 z 2
45 9 0
307
4 9
4-2
4 9
7 56
23 9
3 0
Duplox 2 units
16 Units
Resider-ial, GF Hi s
ase
Residential, Single Family Homo
Resina /., 2 vrltc
Residential, Single Family Home
Parking Lot
Parking Lot
Parkins Lot
residential
8 rceidential
4 SF homo
128 T„ ec i _QMMinR 1r d,4ctrial boildrn„
0 Citen;
561 I ndustriat-Bu1ldine
42 42
4 4 O##ise
4 4 Restaurant
4 3
3 3
3 4
3 3
3 3
Retail
Restaurant
Class Repair Shop
March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
S#:4ltltiress
339-064-95 0.26
339 362 05 045-
339
45339 365 21 045
339-06442 0.15
33849402 045
339 394 01 9709
3394654 04;
339 365 03 045
339 061 01 0,14
339-36522 045
339 365 07 0.15
33946548 045
Asuesi e e P
iag ] I Lower FAod 111REr=9 Use
339-355-12
339-35541
339-355-43
339 365 10
339 365 27
339 061 06
33946545
339-36549
339 355 14
339 052 27
339 365 19
339 061 01
339 365 05
339 365 02
339-365-23
339-365 94
339 052 26
339 392 13
339 392 16
339 391 15
339-38414
339 391 13
339494-04
339 393 07
339 392 17
Revised Draft
220 S BRADFORD AVE
233 S WALNUT AVE
209 S BRADFORD AVE
206 S BRADFORD AVE
128 W SANTA FE AVE
132 W SANTA FE AVE
109 W SANTA FE AVE
210 S MAIN ST
204 S BRADFORD AVE
205 S BRADFORD AVE
226 S MAIN ST
219 1/2 S BRADFORD
AVE
131 W OLNT:R CT
144 S MAIN ST
115 S BRADFORD AVE
111 W SANTA FE AVE
Same parcel as above
228 S BRADFORD AVE
224 S MAIN ST
140 S MAIN ST
137 S BRADFORD AVE
132 S BRADFORD AVE
217 S BRADFORD AVE
211 S BRADFORD AVE
218 S MAIN ST
206 S MAIN ST
201 S BRADFORD AVE
202 S MAIN ST
144 S BRADFORD AVE
313 S MELROSE ST
111 °MGP. CT
312 BAKER ST
314 BAKER ST
320 BAKER ST
202 W SANTA FE AVE
214 W SANTA FE AVE
315 BAKER ST
0.05 04-0
0.29 0.34
0.34 045
045
0.15 0.15
0,
0.12 0.28-
0.15 .280.15
045
042
045
0,34-
0,04 1004
0.15 0-23
0.14 0.16
0.13 0,06-
0.15 460.15
03 03
03 03
04 03
03 eT
03 03
'
28 29 3 3
29 3 3
29 3 3
29 5 5
29 2 2
29 5 5
29 4 4
29 3 3
29 4 4
29 4 4
29 4 4
VVVVVVVVVVVVUVVVVVVVVVVVV
0 0
2 2
40 40
9 8
8 8
4 4
3 3
4 4
5 5
40 40
3 3
8 8
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
10 10
2 2
8 8
46 46
8 8
8 9
3 3
1 1
8 8
Restaurant
Residential, Singlc Family Homc
RYAIt�l, Cia4le ome
Existing Use, Commercial
Existing Use, Commercial
Existing Uce, Commercial
Residential, Multi family
Residential, Condo
Ro:i:*A;cl, Multi family
Residential, Multi family
5x,st+n3'Jcx Cr Horne
Residential, Singlc Family Homc
Residential. Sincic Family Homo
Existing Uso, SF Homo
Existinc Use, Commercial
Existing Use, Commercial
Existing Use American Legion
Residential, Singlo Family Homo
Residential, Single Family Homo
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use Commorcial
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Singlo Family Homo
Residential, Singlc Family Homc
Existinc Use Restaurant
Residontial, Singlc Family Homo
Existinc Use Commercial
Residential, Singlc Family Horne
Residential, Sincic Family Homc
Residential, Singlo Family Homo
Residential, Sincle Family Homo
Residential, Sincic Family Homc
Existinc Use Commercial
Existing Use Restaurant
Residential, Singlc Family, Homo
B-16 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
339-393-06
339 393 05
339 392 18
339 393 01
339 393 02
33946444
339-36445
33946444
339 361 13
339 365 09
339119 391 112
339 391 11
339 391 10
33949-149
339 061 08
3102
339 365 16
339 361 11
339 362 06
339 365 20
339 061 03
339 365 01
339 355 09
33944544
339 052 28
33929
339 355 08
33944545
339 355 07
339vo9-052 21
339 355 06
339-355-48
339-355-05
339-34549
339 355 01
339-052-24
339-355-03
Revised Draft
5#fre` Addressiggir
Genillitoning
216 W SANTA FE AVE
220 W SANTA FE AVE
319 BAKER ST
222 W SANTA FE AVE
221 W SANTA FE AVE
226 W SANTA FE AVE
203 W SANTA FE AVE
209 W SANTA FE AVE
211 W SANTA FE AVE
215 W SANTA FE AVE
23.4 S MAIN ST
322 BAKER ST
326 BAKER ST
332 BAKER ST
334 -BAKER -ST
238 S BRADFORD AVE
221 W SANTA FE AVE
229 S BRADFORD AVE
229 W SANTA FE AVE
239 S WALNUT AVE
211 S BRADFORD AVE
200 S BRADFORD AVE
216 S MAIN ST
131 S MAIN ST
131 S BRADFORD AVE
120 S BRADFORD AVE
120 S BRADFORD AVE
132 S MAIN ST
125 S BRADFORD AVE
126 S MAIN ST itA
110 S BRADFORD AVE
122 S MAIN ST
117 S BRADFORD AVE
118 S MAIN ST
113 S BRADFORD AVE
111 S MAIN ST
102 S BRADFORD AVE
110 S MAIN ST
0-06 OT
0,06 9T
0.15 9T
0.06 OT
0.06 9T
0.06 9T
0.09 9T
0.05 9T
0.05 OT
0.05 9T
0.09 9T
0.16 9T
0.15 0T
0.16 9T
0.16 9T
0.18 9T
0.05 07
04-3 0T
0,09 9T
0.18 9T
0.15 8T
045 9T
0.15 9T
0.15 9T
0.15 9T
0.20 9T
0.20 9T
0.15 9T
0.15 9T
0.15 9T
042 9T
045 OT
0.12 07
045 0T
0.15 9T
044 9T
1.81 9T
0.15 9T
Allowable I
Density Lower
, loll
8T 20 4 4
9T 29 4 4
9T 65 8 3
0-4 29 4 4
0T 29 4 4
0-4 29 4 4
9T 29 2 2
9T 29 4 4
07 29 0 0
9T 29 4 4
9T 29 2 2
0T 65 40 40
9T 65 40 40
0-4 05 9 9
9T 65 9 9
9T 29 5 5
9T 29 4 4
9T 29 2 2
9T 29 2 2
9T 35 5 5
07 25 3 3
9T 29 4 4
9T 29 3 3
9T 35 4 4
9T 35 5 5
9T 35 6 6
9T 35 0 6
9T 35 4 4
9T 35 5 5
9T 35 4 4
9T 35 7 7
9T 35 4 4
9T 35 4 4
9T 35 4 4
0-1 35 4 4
9T 35 4 4
9T 55 99 99
9T 35 4 4
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Single Family Horne
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use, Commercial
Existing Use, Commercial
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Single Family Homc
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Usc. SF Homo
Residential, Multi family
Residential, Multi family
Resi snfi , SinAls Fv"Nv Homo
Residential, Single Family Homo
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use, Commercial
Residential, Single Family Homo
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Single Family Homc
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Single Family Homo
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use, Residential
Existing Use, Residential
Recido b, Cia lc 5rmily-He4:Fie
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Single Homc
Existing Use Commercial
Residontial, Single Family Homo
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Single Family Homc
Residential, Single Family Homc
Residential. Single Family Homo
Existing Usc Church
Residential, Single Family Homc
B_17 March 2O22October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Sheet Adc#ce&s
Ger ai•P1aeDensAy
Allowable
(Eloles)
Lower Mod Ab•eVeNet
Existing Use
33945549
1 339 355 02
1 339 355 22
1 339 392 02
339 392 01
339 392 22
339 392 12
339 392 04
3390 392 06
339492-03
339 392 09
339 392 08
339 392 03
339 392 05
339492-14
339 392 11
339-363-04
339 363 10
339 363 19
339-363--11
335-363-29
339 363 16
33946343
339 363 18
339491•-16
339 391 16
339 391 06
339-39144
339 391 02
339 391 03
339 391 01
339-39145
316 331 07
316 164 24
TOTALS
Revised Draft
100 W CHAPMAN AVE
106 S MAIN ST
CHAPMAN/MAIN
350 W SANTA FE AVE
352 W SANTA FE AVE
320 S WALNUT AVE
305 S MELROSE ST
338 W SANTA FE AVE
334 W SANTA FE AVE
330 W SANTA FE AVE
322 W SANTA FE AVE
326 W SANTA FE AVE
310 W SANTA FE AVE
336 W SANTA FE AVE
311 W SANTA FE AVE
310 W SANTA FE AVE
232 S WALNUT AVE
319 W SANTA FE AVE
301 W SANTA FE AVE
311 W SANTA FE AVE
325 W SANTA FE AVE
317 W SANTA FE AVE
315 W SANTA FE AVE
307 W SANTA FE AVE
400 BAKER ST
400 BAKER ST
321 S WALNUT AVE
412 W SANTA FE AVE
307 S WALNUT AVE
311 S WALNUT AVE
315 S WALNUT AVE
319 S WALNUT AVE
1952 E. Veterans Way
513 S. Van Buren St.
442
045
043
0.11 0.14
049
0.11 0.06
0.06 046
0.11 0.06
046
0.06 044
043
0.15 0.15
0.06 0.17
0.11 0.06
0.06 0.11
1.61 0.16
0.14 043
0.13 0.13
0.13 0.11
044
0,17
H,.L
3,Efl22222222L22222fl222fl
35 35
35 35
35 65
35 35
35 35
35 35
35 35
35 35
35 35
35 35
35 35
35 35
65 65
65 35
35 35
65 65
25 25
101
14 4
4 3
3 6
4 2
4 2
4 2
4 4
4 2
4 5
2 5
3 4
4 4
40 8
3 3
4 3
8 49
3 1,255 644 9 1;896
14 4
4 3
3 6
4 2
4 2
4 2
4 4
4 2
4 5
2 5
3 4-
4 4
101
40 8
3 3
4 3
8 49
3 Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Single Family Homo
Placentia Water Tower
Residsrtial, Ci lc Family -Home
Residential, Single Family Home
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Multi family
Residential, Single Family Homo
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use Commercial
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Single Family Homc
Residential, Single Family Homo
Existing Uso, Residential
Existing Use, Residential
Residential, Single Family Home
Residential, Multi family
Existing Use Commercial
Residential, Single Family Homc
Residential. Single Family Homc
Residential, Single Family Homo
Residential, Single Family Home
Residential, Multi family
Residential, Apartment
Residential, Apartment
Residential, Multi family
Residential, Single Family Homo
Residential, Single Family Homo
Residential, Multi family
Residential, Single Family Homo
Residential, Single Family Homo
industrial
house
B_18 March 2O220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Table B -S: Candidate Sites for Rezoning
APN
Street Address—_ Acres
339-451-01 500-511 Cameron St. _ 0.89
339 451-14 1 Camero St.
339-451-06 516 Cameron St. 0.34
530 Cameron St. 0.49
531 Cameron St. 0.58
_521 Cameron St. 0.37
515 S. Melrose St. 1.54
505 S. Melrose St. 1.12.
330 W. Crowther Ave.
420 W. Crowther Ave.
440 W. Crowther Ave.
480 W. Crowther Ave.
550 W. Crowther Ave
339-451-05
339-451-03
339451.02
339-101-13
339-101-12
339-101-11
339-101-14
339-101-10
339-101-07
_339-101-06
Subtotals
346-162-01
346-162-02
346-164-23
346-331-02
346-331-03
346-331-11
346-331-27
346-331-29
_346-331-30
346-331-32
346-331-07
346-164-24
Subtotals
Totals
Geperat Plan
OrangethorpelJefferson
Orangethorpe/Jefferson
503 S. Van Buren St.
601 S. Lakeview Ave.
Lakeview Loop/Veterans Wv
625 S. Lakeview Ave.
Egvised Draft
ZeninQ
1 Proposed I Density Potential
GPIZoni� dulac I Units
Existing Use
Industrial M (PMD) TCD 95 73 511 Cameron-Elliav Acoustics 500 Cameron -Giroux Glas Industrial M (PMDI TDD 95 24 Vacant building
Industrial M (PMD) TOD 95 28 Vacant building
Industrial. M (PMD) TOD 95 40 Vacant building
Industrial M (PMD) TOD 95 48 SMC (Sun Meat Comoanv)
Industrial M (PMD( TOD 95 30 Contractor's Office (JEC Electric) Industrial. M TOD 95 126 Vanderveer Industrial Plastics Industrial M TOD 95 92 Coast Southwest
0.59. Industrial M TOD 95 48 Silkv Socks_
1.55 Industrial M TOD 95 127 Coast Southwest
0.53 Industrial M TOD 95 43 Contractor's Business (HVAC Medical Incl
3.34 Industrial M TOD 95 274 Self Storage container business {Extra Space Storage)
2.87 Industrial M TOD 91 235 Warehouse/Office business (West Coast Metal Stamping)
14.5 1.189
0.47. HDR R-3 HDR/R3 30 13 Vacant land
4.55 HDR R-3 HDRIR3 30 123 Vacant land
0.21 HDf R,-3. HDR/R3 30 6 Vacant land
4.55 .HDR R-3 HDR/R3 310 123. Vacant land
0.13 HDR R-3 HDR/R3 30 3 Vacant land
0.53 HDR R-3 HDR/R3 30 14 Vacant land
HDR R-3 HDRIR3 30 10 Vacant land
HDR R-3 HDR/R3 30 11 Vacant land
HDR R-3 HDR/R3 30 12 Vacant land_
HDR R-3 HDR/R3 30 22 Vacant land
HDR R-3 HDR/R3 30 21 Industrial
HDR R-3 HDR/R3 30 5 SFR
363
1,552
2006 E. Lakeview Loon 138
2018 E. Lakeview L000 0.39
613 S. Lakeview Ave. 0.45
1958 E. Veterans Way 0.81
1952 E. Veterans Wav 0.78
513 S. Van Buren St. 0.17
13.4 27.9
B-19 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Figure B-2: Vacant Sites
0 0.5
Revised Draft
1 2
Miles
B-20
March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Figure B-3: Underutilized Sites
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
Revised Draft
B-21
March 202zOctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix B: Residential Land Inventory
Figure 13-4: Candidate Sites for Rezoning
0 0.5 1 2
Revised Draft
Miles
B-22
March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element Performance
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element
Performance
Section 65588(a) of the Government Code requires that jurisdictions evaluate the effectiveness of the existing Housing Element, the appropriateness of goals, objectives and policies, and the progress in implementing programs for the previous planning period. This appendix contains a review the housing goals, policies, and programs of the previous housing element, and evaluates the degree to which these programs have been implemented during the previous planning period, 2013 through 2021. The findings from this evaluation have been instrumental in determining the City's 2021 Housing Implementation Program.
Table C-1 summarizes the programs contained in the previous Housing Element along with the City's progress in implementation.
Table C-2 presents the City's progress in meeting the quantified objectives from the previous Housing Element.
During the mini plarnning period the City has been very successful in addressing the housing needs of special needs populations,
In early 2019 the North Orange County Service Planning Area for Homelessness Outreach Efforts reached an important miles a ie. A regional partnership of 13 cities located in northern Orange County (Anaheim. Brea. Buena Park. Cvnress. Fullerton. La Habra. La Palma. Los Alamitos. Orange. Placentia, Stanton. Villa Pjrk and Yorba Linda) came toget er o share intelligence and resources to address regional homelessness. Their concept was to promote greater regional coordination on homeless issues while reducing the an of control regarding working with the County of Orange and others.
After months of extensive discussions. negotiations and assessments. two locations within the North Orange Coun_Service Planning Area were identified for the development_of"navigation centers" based on a number of factors including zoning. proximity to related services and site availability. The, navigation centers are a multi -jurisdictional approach to guiding underserved residents back into society by increasg access to a shelter with basic needs. health and job resources. and opportunities to reunite with friend and family. Each center was planned to accommodate 100 beds. thereby increasing the regional bed count to 525 additional beds available to homeless individuals in conjunction with a project in the city of Anaheim that accommodated 325 new beds.
Funding For the Navigation Centers was secured through application and governmental meetings with state. reajonal, county and local officials resulting in the $12 million in State of California Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP) funds dedicated for the site acauisitions and construction of these Navigation Centers. Each of the North Orange County Service Planning Are cities also committed funds for construction and ongoing operation of the Navigation Centers. A Memorandum of Understanding was prepared and presented to the City Councils of all thirteen city governments for execution in May. 2019. Construction began in 2019 and the opening of the First 100 -bed Navigation Center in Placentia Revised Draft
C-1 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element Performance
Ira
occurred on March 31. 2020. This groundbreaking success story was horn of the regional need and public official desire to came together to address homelessness and pioneer the way to create and Qperate a multi -jurisdictional homelessness facility. Programs 1.4. 1.14 and 23 identify actions the City is taking to address homelessness.
In addition to the Placentia Navigation Center the City successfully Facilitated development of a 189- unit100%low-income deed -restricted housing development (USA Properties. Figure 8-11. The nroiect is currently under construction adjacent to the Placentia Metrolink Station.
Revised Draft C-2 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element Performance
Table C-1: 2013-2021 Program Evaluation
1 Name of Prograng
HE -1.1: Manufactured Use of Manufactured Housing
Housing and Mobile Homes
HE -1.2: Locate Housing Encourage new housing in proximity Near Transportation, to transportation, employment and
Employment and Services services
HE -1.3: Pursue County,
State and Federal Funds
HE -1.4: Emergency Shelters
and Transitional and
Supportive Housing
HE -1.5: Infrastructure
Program
Revised. Draft
Increase use of County, State and
Federal funds
Continue to encourage the provision
of emergency shelters, transitional
and supportive housing
Reduce constraints associated with
infrastructure
Zoning Code amendment Ongoing.
by June 2014
Ongoing
Monitor funding
opportunities on an
annual basis and apply
for funding as
opportunities arise
Ongoing
Annual review, revisions
as appropriate
Ongoing. This remains a high priority of the City as the construction of the Placentia Metrolink Station is scheduled to start late 2019. The City Council approved and adopted the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Packing House District near the future Metrolink Station on April 18, 2017 which allows densities up to 95 du/acre. To date, 633 units have been entitled in the TOD District. On July 18, 2017, the Old Town Zoning District was adopted (Ordinance No. 0-2017-05) by City Council and the Development Standards include a sub -area allowing high density housing by right without a public hearing, at a density up to 65 dwelling units per acre. Both the TOD and Old Town Zoning Districts are immediately adjacent to the Placentia Metrolink Station.
Ongoing. The City is continually reviewing grant funding opportunities for housing developments and is actively pursuing County and State funds, including transportation circulation grants provided by the State Department of Transportation and SCAG. In partnership with SCAG, the City Council recently approved formation of an EIFD in the Old Town Zoning District that will result in $8.2 million in funding for infrastructure related to transit oriented development The City successfully applied for and received SB2 and LEAP Grant funding.
PMC Ch. 23.47 amended to permit emergency shelters in the M Zone.
The City of Placentia purchased a property at 731 S. Melrose Street, Placentia, and constructed a 100 -bed homeless shelter, which opened in March 2020.
Ongoing. The City annually reviews development costs and opportunities for removing constraints due to the high cost of infrastructure improvements. The City is near built -out with infrastructure mostly in place. Infrastructure near proposed Metrolink Station is a strong candidate for competitive grant funding.
The City is continually reviewing grant funding opportunities for housing developments and is actively pursuing County and State funds, including transportation circulation grants provided by the State Department of Transportation and SCAG. In partnership with C-3 March 2O220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element Performance
Name of Program
Objective
Timeframe
Status of Program Implementation
HE -1.6: Development Minimize development
Processing System Review review/processing time
HE -1.7: Vacant and
Underutilized Land
Inventory
HE -1.8: Adequate Sites for
Housing Development
HE -1.9: Monitoring of
Constructed Units Based on
Income Level
HE -1.10: Encourage
Development of Housing for
Extremely Low -Income
Households
Revised Draft
Inventory of vacant and
underutilized land
Rezone a minimum of 8 acres to
permit residential development at a
density of 30 du/ac (or an amount of
land needed to accommodate at least
231 units at an alternate density of
more than 30 units/acre).
Tracking performance by income
level
67 ELI Units by 2021
Ongoing, Annual Review
Annual update of
inventory
Prior to October 2014
Ongoing
Annual consultation with
affordable housing
developers, or as
development
opportunities arise
SCAG, the City Council recently approved formation of an EIFD in the Old Town Zoning District that will result in $8.2 million in funding for infrastructure related to transit -oriented development.
Completed/Ongoing. The City annually reviews its development processing procedures and has adopted several streamlined procedures in the last three years. Ordinance No. 0-2017-05 adopted by City Council in July 2017 codifies Old Town Development Standards including a sub -area allowing high density housing by right without a public hearing, reducing development processing timeframes, allowing housing at a density up to 65 dwelling units per acre.
Ongoing. The City provides the inventory of vacant and underutilized land upon request by developers, including affordable housing developers and routinely discusses these parcels with developers.
The City has budgeted consulting services with a private economic development firm to assist with identifying up-to-date inventory of vacant and underutilized land. The City is in the process of selling these vacant lands to qualified developers. The City keeps a list of vacant and under-utilized sites that are owned by the City and/or City -related agency.
Completed. Ordinance No. 0-2017-05 adopted by the City Council in July 2017 codifies the Old Town District Development Standards which includes a sub -area allowing high-density residential housing by right without a discretionary review nor public hearing, at a density up to 65 dwelling units per acre for an area exceeding 1.27 acres. The maximum density for this sub -area is up to 65 dwelling units/acre. In addition, TOD Zone was also adopted in 2017 at densities of 65-95 du/ac).
Ongoing. Forms have been developed to gain the information at the time a building permit is issued.
Completed. The completion and occupancy of 49 very low income units in 2020 (the Veteran's Village development) contributes to achieving this goal. The City is reviewing other incentive programs to implement. The City has increased its contacts with non-profit developers regarding affordable housing opportunities. The elimination of redevelopment set aside funds severely restricts this C-4 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element Performance
Name of Program Objective Timeframe Status of Program Implementation effort. (John, also see attached 189 unit USA Properties staff report.
Some of those units maybe extremely low).
HE -1.11: Amend the Review and Revise Density Bonus 2/1/2014 Completed. The City's density bonus ordinance was reviewed and the Density Bonus Ordinance Ordinance City will follow changes in State law relating to such bonuses. (John see PMC CH. 23.23, adopted in 2002. Not sure if it is consistent with State law).
HE -1.12: Development of Senior Housing Development Ongoing Ongoing. The City provides incentives and density bonuses for senior Senior Housing housing development. On December 1, 2020, City Council approved entitlements for a 64 -unit affordable senior housing development at 1314 N. Angelina Drive. (see attached staff report)
HE -1.13: Development of Housing Units with larger bedroom Ongoing Ongoing. The City has not implemented an incentive program. The Housing for Larger Families counts elimination of redevelopment funds severely restricts this effort. The City is reviewing incentive programs to implement. The City has increased its contacts with non-profit developers regarding affordable housing opportunities.
HE -1.14: Housing for Housing Units for households with Ongoing Completed/Ongoing. The City has not implemented an incentive Persons with Special Needs special needs program at this time, however the issuance of permits for 49 very low income units in 2018 (the Veteran's Village development) contributes to this as qualified residents must be Veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness and the development will provide "wrap around" services to provide vocational training, mental health services, job placement, and more. The City has also identified potential parcels for additional special needs housing.
HE -1.15: Transit -Oriented Encourage Transit -Oriented Ongoing Completed and ongoing. The City Council approved and adopted the Development Development Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Packing House District near the future Metrolink Station on April 18, 2017 which allows densities up to 95 du/acre. To date, 633 units have been entitled in the TOD District. On July 18, 2017, the Old Town Zoning District was adopted (Ordinance No. 0-2017-05) by City Council and the Development Standards include a sub -area allowing high density housing by right without a public hearing, at a density up to 65 dwelling units per acre.
Both the TOD and Old Town Zoning Districts are immediately adjacent to the Placentia Metrolink Station and allow Transit Oriented Development. The City continues to work with developers on Transit Oriented Development opportunities connected with the forthcoming Placentia Metrolink Station. Incentives include the utilization of City owned property as well as reduced parking requirements and Revised Draft
C-5 March 2O220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element Performance
Name of Program
Objective
Timeframe
Status of Program 1 mplementatioriMMINK
HE -1.16: Single -Room
Occupancy Units (SROs)
Facilitate development of SROs
HE -1.17: Review and Revise Adopt appropriate parking
Residential Parking requirements for new TOD and
Requirements mixed-use development; Review
existing multi -family parking
standards and revise as necessary
HE -1.18: Encourage and Encourage and Facilitate Lot
Facilitate Lot Consolidation Consolidation
HE -2.1: Support of Regional Fair Housing Activities
Fair Housing Efforts
HE -2.2: Section 8 Rental
Assistance
HE -2.3: Reasonable
Accommodation
Procedures
Revised Draft
Provide information regarding
housing assistance
Provide reasonable accommodation Ongoing
in housing regulations for persons
with disabilities
densities up to 95 dwelling units per acre for the TOD Zone and up to 65 dwelling units per acre for the Old Town Zone, both of which surround the proposed facility.
Ongoing Completed. On May 7, 2016 the City Council approved Ordinance No. 0-2013-08 to amend Title 23 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Placentia Municipal Code Pertaining to Emergency Shelters, Supportive and Transitional Housing Facilities, Single Room Occupancies and Provisions for Reasonable Accommodations for Persons with Disabilities, including Standards and Procedures thereto. (John, see PMC CH. 23.24)
2014 Partially completed. The City will review and propose amendments to its city-wide residential parking requirements during the forthcoming General Plan and Zoning Code updates. The City has already adopted significantly reduced parking requirements for the newly adopted Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Zone and Old Town District Zone, both of which were adopted in 2017.
Zone Code amendment in Completed and Ongoing. The City will address potential regulatory 2014 incentives through the General Plan, Zoning Code, and newly adopted Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Zone and Old Town Zone, both of which were adopted in 2017 and both of which encourage lot consolidation. To date, 633 units have been entitled in the TOD District. One development consists of two lots being consolidated to accommodate the new TOD development and the other consists of seven lots consolidated to accommodate the new TOD development.
Ongoing Ongoing. The City continues to support the Fair Housing Council of Orange County and to refer members of our community to the Council for counseling, mediation and low-cost advocacy for housing related needs.
Ongoing Ongoing. The City continues to partner with the Orange County Housing Authority to receive vouchers for Placentia residents.
On May 7, 2016 the City Council approved Ordinance No. 0-2013-08 to amend Title 23 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Placentia Municipal Code Pertaining to Emergency Shelters, Supportive and Transitional Housing Facilities, Single Room Occupancies and Provisions for Reasonable Accommodations for Persons with Disabilities, including Standards and Procedures Therefore.
C-6 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element Performance
Name of Program
Timeframe
Status of Program ! mplementation
HE -2.4: Comprehensive Housing Resource Directory
Housing Resource Directory
HE 2.5: Zoning Regulations
HE -3.1: Community Based
Neighborhood
Rehabilitation
HE -3.2: Neighborhood
Identity
HE -3.3: Placentia
Rehabilitation Grant
Program
HE -3.4: Energy
Conservation and
Sustainable Building
Practices
HE -3.5: Monitoring At -Risk
Units
HE -3.6: Vacant Building
Ordinance
Revised Draft
Revise the Municipal Code definition
of family consistent with current law
Conserve and Improve existing
residential neighborhoods
Creation of Neighborhood Identity
72 units provided rehabilitation
grants
Energy conservation/reduced utility
costs
Encourage the preservation and
extension of "at -risk" units. Prevent
blight and deterioration in
neighborhoods
Prevent blight and deterioration in
neighborhoods
Ongoing
March 2014
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Continue to provide
energy conservation
educational materials to
residents
Ongoing coordination
with the County and
nonprofits
Ongoing
The City does not have the resources to develop its own directory but works with the Orange County Community Resources Department to provide information and direct residents to their online housing resource area for information.
In process - not yet completed.
Ongoing. The City created a Neighborhood Services Division in order to foster increased neighborhood services to include the coordination of CDBG funded rehabilitation. This Office is responsible for the rehabilitation program and is working with specific neighborhoods on community -centered programs.
Ongoing. Through the City's Neighborhood Services Division, the City continues to work with neighborhoods to foster their sense of identification.
Ongoing/Completed. The City is very successful in implementing the CDBG rehabilitation program. The City is on track to exceed the identified number of units rehabilitated.
The City has utilized federal Energy Efficiency & Conservation Block Grants to provide material and energy efficient products to residents in order to promote energy efficiency. Additionally, on December 6, 2016, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 0-2016-07 adopting the new 2016 California Building Codes, including the latest Green Building Code and the City Council has authorized incentivizing increased compliance with Title 24 through building permit fee reduction.
Ongoing. The City continues to work with the County of Orange Community Resources department to target at -risk projects and seek assistance from the County and non-profit housing groups to continue monitoring and implementing a strategy to preserve such units.
Separately, the City is currently partnering with a non-profit to possibly apply for a Federal grant.
Completed and ongoing. On May 7, 2013 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 0-2013-02 pertaining to the maintenance and rehabilitation of long term boarded and vacant buildings. In addition, in late 2020, the City adopted the International Property Maintenance Code, 2018 Edition (latest edition). The City continues to enforce the C-7 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element Performance
Name of Program Objective Timeframe Status of Program Implementation Vacant Building Ordinance through its Code Enforcement, Planning, and Building Divisions.
HE -4.1 Partnerships with Establish partnerships with non- Ongoing Ongoing. The City began to establish, and continues to do establish, Housing Industry profit and for-profit housing relationships with non-profit and for-profit housing partners. The City developers issued building permits for 49 very low income units in 2018 (the Veteran's Village development) and qualified residents must be Veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness and the development will provide "wrap around" services to provide vocational training, mental health services, job placement, and more.
The City has also identified potential parcels for additional special needs housing.
HE -4.2: Participation in Continue participating in the County Ongoing Continuum of Care Forum of Orange Continuum of Care Forum ,Revised Draft
The City continues to participate with the County of Orange Continuum of Care Forum and has actively responded to the needs of the County in providing letters of support and other requested material in support of funding applications to the Federal government.
C-8 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix C: Review of Housing Element Performance
Table C-2 — Progress in Achieving Housing Element Quantified Objectives, 2013-2021 Program
1 Quantified Objective 1 Level of Achievement
New Construction
Extremely Low 67
49 Very Low 66
Low 98
Moderate 90 40
Above -moderate 209 343
TOTAL 530 432
Rehabilitation
Acquisition/Rehabilitation
Extremely Low 2
Very Low 2
Low 2
6 TOTAL
Placentia Rehabilitation Grant Program
Very Low/Low
Preservation/Conservation
At -Risk Units
30 Imperial Villas- 58
Moderate
58 Revised Draft C-9 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Appendix a: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Assembly Bill fAB) 6B6 requires housing elements to contain an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH] consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing fAFFW) Final Rule of luly 16. 2015,
Under California law. AFFH means "taking, meaningful actions. in addition to combating discrimination. that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics." To comply with AB 686, the City has completed the following outre•ich and analysis.
1. Outreach
As discussed in the Public Participation appendix. early in the Housing Element update process the City developed a list of stakeholders with local expertise in housing issues. including fair housing The stakeholder list included local service providers. affordable housing developers. and fair housing organizations in an effort to include the interests of lower-income residents and persons with special needs in the community.
Over the course of the Housing Element update. pilicess the City conducted a series of public meetings, Public notice of each meeting was posted on the City's dedicated I-lrn'sing Element wehsite and was also sent directly to persons and organizations on the stakeholder list. Public meetings were held both online and in person to encourage those with mobility difficulties to participate. Agendas and other information for each meeting was posted on the City website to allow interested stakeholders to acce.ss to this information throughout the process. Interested persons were also encouraged to provide input or ask questions via telephone or email. Please refer to Appendix A for additional information regarding the outreach efforts and how public input was incorporated into the Housing Element. information was made available in both English and Spanish,
in addition to public workshops and hearings. the City also directly contacted housing advocates, housing service providers. and community organizations who serve the interests of lower-income households and special needs groups to solicit comments on housing needs. barriers to fair and affordable housing. and opportunities for development.
To encourage continuing stakeholder involvement in local housing issues throughout the planning period, Program 2.1 includes a commitment to conduct ongoing. proactive outreach to engage members of ail socio-economic groups and recruit members of unclerrenresented groups to particinate in City meetings.
2. Fair Housing Assessment
This section provides an assessment of fair housing issues in Placentia including fair housing enforcement and outreach capacity. patterns of integration and segregation. racial or ethnicpatterns of Revised Draft
D-1 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
psee er,wa'
concentration. disparities in access. to opportunities. and disproportionate housing needs. iudutling displacement risk.
A. Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity.
The primary fair housing organization serving Placentia is the Fair Housing Council of Orange County f https://www.fairhousingoc.org/] . The FHCOC was formed in 1965 in the wake of the civil righty movement that resulted in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Council incorporated in 19611. the s_ameyear that Congress extended civil rights protections to cover housing with the adoption of the Fair Housing Act. binder the direction of a volunteer board of directors and staff the agency works to fulfill a mission of protecting the quality of life in OrangeCoun y by ensuring equal access to housin ipnortunities, fostering diversity and preserving dignity and human rights. An operating member of the National Fair Housing Alliance. the FHCOC works to eliminate housing discrimination and guarantee the rights of all people to freely choose the housing for which they qualify in the area they desire. Services provided by the Fair Housing Council include fair housing enforcement and education. landlord/tenant counseling. mediation and homebuyer HUD counseling. which includes first-time homebuyer educ.?n and mortgage default counseling. Services are available to low -to -moderate income clients free of charge and to others for a moderate donation. Services are available in Enc,!lish. Spanish. and Vietnamese.
Oranae County
The County of Orange acts as lead agency for the "Urban County." which includes 21 non -entitlement cities. Placentia is a participating city in the Urban County Program. The raog recent Qrange County Analysis of Impediments to Fair !-lapsing Choice fthe "AI"1 was adopted in June 2020 and includes a thorough examination of structural harriers to fair housing choice and access to opportunity for members of historically marginalized groups protected from discrimination by the federal Fair Housing Act rFHAI. The Al also outlines fair housing priorities and goals to overcome fair housing issues. In addition. the Al lays out meaningful Strategies that can be implemented to achieve progress towards the County's obligation to affirmatively furthering fair housing. The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law fLawvers' Committee!, in consultation with Orange County itsrisdictions and with input from a wide range of stakeholders through a community participation process. prepared the AI. To provide a foundation for the conclusions and recommendations presented in this Al. the following information was reviewed and analyzed:
• Data from the U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey and other sources about the, demographic. housing, economic. and educational landscape of the county. nearby communities, and the broader region,
• Various County and city planning documents and ordinances; • Data reflecting housing discrimination complaints;.
• The input of a broad range of stakeholders that deal with the realities of the housing market and the lives of members of protected classes in Orange County.
As required by federal regulations, the Al draws from the sources listed above to conduct an analysis of fair housing issues such as patterns of integration and segregation of members of protected classes. racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty regionally. disparities in access to opportunity for protected classes. and disproportionate housing needs. The aria ysis also examine.s_publicly support housing in the County as well as fair housing issues for persons with disabilities. Private and public fair Revised Draft D-2 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
housing enforcement. outreach canacitv. and resources are evaluated as well. The Al identifies contributing factors to fair housing issues and steps that should be taken to overcome these barriers.
To ensure that the analysis contained in the Al truly reflects conditions in the community and that the goals and strategies are targeted and feasible, the participation of a wide range of stakeholders is of critical importance. Abroad array of outreach was conducted through community meetings. focus groups, and public hearings.
In preparing this AI. the Lawyers' Committee reached nut to tenants. landlords. homeowners. fair. housing organizations. civil rights and advocacy organizations. legal services provers. social services providers. housing c v ers, and industry groups to hear direct] ..ibout fair housing issues affecting residents of Orange County.
Beginning in October 2019. the Lawyers' Committee held meetings with individual stakeholders throughout the Coun y. In January and February 2020. evening community meetings were held in Mission Vieio. Westminster/Garden Grove. Santa Ana, and Fullerton (which is immediately adjacent to Placentia). Also in February. the Lawyers' Committee held a focus group with a wide array of nonprofit organizations and government officials.
Geographically specific community meetings were held across Orange County, including the South, West. Central. anti North parts of the County. Additional outreach was conducted for members �f protected classes. including the Latino and Vietnamese communities. All community meetings had translation services available if reouested in Spanish and Vietnamese. In addition. all meetings were held in locations accessible to people with mobility issues. The Executive Summary of the Al was translated into Spanish and Vietnamese. Public hearings and City Council meetings were held throughout the ounty,
The County Al describes.ie departments and organizations that handle fair housing enforcement and outreach in Orange County. The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing rIFE ) investigates complaints of employment and housing discrimination. The Fair Housing Council of Orange County (FHCOC) provides services throughout the Urban County, including Placentia. to ensure eaual access to housing. FFICOC's services include outreach and education. homebuyer education. mortgage_ default counseling. landlord -tenant mediation. and limited low-cost advocacy. The Fair Housing Council investigates claims of housing discrimination and assists with referrals to DFEH. Community Legal Aid SoCal is a legal service provider serving low-income people in Orange County and Southeast Los Angeles County.
The 2020 Orange County Al reported that:
• FHCOC regionally conducted or participated in 467 education and/or outreach activities.
Regional y. over 9.550 people were served by these activities. Through its various regional outreach efforts FHCOC distributed over 82.130 nieces of literaturesn fair housing. its services and other housing -related tonics. Additionally. throughout Orange County FHCOC held 32 training sessions for rental property owners/managers. FHCOC presented 16 fair housing, seminars, 70 general fair housing workshops
• On a regional basis. FHCOC staff reReived 363 allegations of housing discrimination and opened, 179 cases where the allegations seemed sufficiently meritorious to warrant further investigation Revised Draft
D-3 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
andlor action. FHCOC also conducted 362 systemic onsite tests. either haired or 'sandwich'. 51. tests occurring in the jurisdiction and 215 other testing activities. • On a regional basis. activities provided by FHCOC included assisting 7.664 unduplicated households addressing 24.766 issues. disputes andlor inquires.
City of Placentia
As seen in Figure D-1. the HCD AFFH Data Viewer renorted a Fair Housing Enfor ement and Outreach (FHEO) inwiry rate of less than 0.25 per 1.000 person for the 2013-2021 period in Placentia.
Figure D-1: FHEO Inauiries — Orange County and Placentia AFFH Data Viewer
181
:
© ®
Glifnrn4i Anp,artrnant of Routing and Community i) v Iop mord •
a
Mlrr
raluavA
6>;r 1ye
• •
•
O
• .11iA7Gf1u
yVkg!T tf •
40020mo •
• of 0 ry
•
to T er
AtIluld Min&
•
•
Jo"'
AFFH DATA AND MAPPPING RESOURCES
ounty :aun•ants
(R) FHE0 Inquiries by City (HUD, 2013-2021)
Total Inqu.res ae, Ore -Thousand Peop'e
Greater than
< 5 Irqu.res
• < 251nq,nes
The Constraints sgction of this Housing Element describes ways that. the City works to address potential impediments to fair housing choice. The City continues to contract with the FHCOC to implement the regional Fair Housing Plan fAil and to offer fair housing services and tenant/landlord, counseling to residents.
B. Patterns of Integration and 5ecireciation
1) Race and Ethnicity
As seen in Figure D-2, the Percentage of non-white population in Placentia is highest in the southeastern Portion of the City and is similar to the adiacent areas in Anaheim and Fullerton. while the northern and. northeastern areas have the lowest non-white proportion similar to the adiacent areas of Yorha Linda.
In describing the County -wide racial and ethnic make -un. the Coi.inty Al fp. 1221 states that. "In general.
Whits residents tend to reside towards the outer edges of the county. while Hispanic and sometimes Asian residents are found more in the center of the county." This countywide distribution is illustrated in Figure D-3,
Revised Draft
D-4 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fiaure D-2: Racial 17emoaraphics - Placentirl
e AFFH Data Viewer
Clifo*Na Department of llotnk gandCarununkry0owlvpntunt AFFH OATA ANE) MAPPRiNG RESOURCES HOME S'nox+ca•cn lo, Placeno
own 1•un•
arl,s
(R) Racial Demographics (2018) - Block Group
Percent of Total Non-Whae Pooularuon
` > 81%
61 80%
A 41.60%
21 40%
5 20%
Pl ocontlo
.•iir yfliinile Ate
;gt����f r.cn•.e
• ->YY
•i1,141:•01141.1041/,•••
Fiaure D-3: Racial Demoaraphics — Oranae County
r 'AFFH Data Viewer['aliltnrriaDapanmentorHoming and Common ny13evoloimttmr AFFH DATA ANDMAPPPJNG RESOURCES ibrni
•117.33137:71 Deyfeiss.
Revised Draft
Goofy Gnu n.On6.
(R) Racial Demographics (2018) - Block Group
Percent of Total Non -White Population
■ >81%
■ 61.80%
■ 41-60%
■ 21-40%
5 20%
D-5 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
2i Persor>s with Disabilities
As shown on Figure D-4, higher percentages of disabled residents (10-2Q%) are located in the northeastern and southwestern portions of the city while the disability rate in other areas of the city is under 10%.
Additional data regarding the number of _people with disabilities by disability type in Placentia is provided in Figure 2-20 of Chapter 2: Housing Needs Assessment. Some individuals may experience more than one disability, and some disability types are not recorded for children below a certain age.
The California Denartrnent of Developmental Services (DDS) estimates that there are 392 persons with developmental disabilities within the ZIP code areas that encompass the City of Placentia.
Figure D-4: Population with a Disability - Placentia
AFFH Data Viewer
rallloi ma Unp:uunnm nl Ilnnsinvind Comnmmity AEFI I DATA AND MAPPPIN(; RESOURCES HOME Placentia, CA, USA X Q
:c c_ns 1r. Placenn
rdsGl e@Js
-rim 1 5i7e:1.F'
tie
9zgmr.:504
-- —,oC rzt'
CitytTe n Been arie
(R) Population with a Disability (ACS, 2015 - 2019) - Tract Percent of Populaoon w rh a D.sabJi;y
■ >40%
■ 30% 40%
` 20% 30%
10% 20%
H.10%
The Orange County Al discusses disability information countywide. According to the Al, "Communities with higher concentrations of persons with disabilities are somewhat more likely to be located in the more ra Tally and ethnically diverse northern portion of the county than they are in the southern portion of the county" (see Figure D-5). This is reflected in the fact that six of the eight cities that have higher concentrations of persons with disabilities are in northern Orange County.
Revised Draft
D-6 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fiaure D--5: Population with a Disability - Orange County AFFH Data Viewer
[alitwnla UupaitmdN ul Hou++m7 11,11dC4nwiun.ov Unvolpyrudra AF r -H ISAIA AND NIAPPPING RESOURCES HOME
(R) Population with a Disability (ACS, 2015 - 2019) - Tract e e , of PoD, ,.o, a:r a D s�n•�rti
■ 3o dq'.,
▪ 20% 30 -
The housing needs of persons with disabilities vary. but generally include accessible and affordable housing. and access to sunoortive services. More severely disabled individuals may require a group living environment where supervision is provided. and the most severely affected individuals may require an institutional environment where medical attention and physical therapy are provided. The, City of Placentia facilitates housing for persons with disabilities through its Reasonable Accommodation procedures and regulations to encourage production of supportive housing. 31 Familial Status
Familial status refers to the presence of children under the age cif 1$ whether the child is biologically related to the head of household. and the martial status of the head of households. Families with children may face housing discrimination by landlords who fear that children will cause property damage. Some landlords may have cultural biases against children of the opposite sex sharing a bedroom—Differential treatments such as limiting the number of children in a complex or confining children to a specific location are also fair housing concerns.
Single -parent households are also protected by fair housing law. Female -headed households with children require special consideration and assistance because of their greater need for affordable housing and accessible day care. health care. and other supportive services. As discussed in the Housing Needs Assessment. 12.6% of Placentia households are female -headed (compared to 14.3% in the SCAG region). 5.8% are female -headed and with children (compared to 6.6% in the SCAG region). and 0.4% are female -headed and with children under 6 fcomnared to 1A% in the $("A•(. regionl, Figure D-6 shows the nercentage of children living in married counle households in Placentia while Figure D-7 shows similar data for the county as a whole,
Revised Draft
D-7 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Figure D-6: nercentaae of Children in Married Couple Households - Placentia. [:xldaunn VuµNO Ylt of lfoiu:rxi And Crr.n,,hlily.Liwola nann AFFH DATA AND MAP.PPING FIE 50UH[:CS F!OML Y 01 ua Llrsee
I S F141.13.480 Devon
o wn : OL n Jriei
(R) Percent of Children in Marred - Couple Households (ACS, 2015.2019) pe -torr of Child,en ,n Married Couple Ho,.seholas
■ 60% 80%
lb 40% 60%
20%-40%
80%
■ 60% P.0%
b 40% 60`6
20% 40%
< 20%
41 Income
Identifying low/moderate-income (LMI1 areas is an important aspect in understanding patterns of segregation. I -IUD defines a LMI area as a Census tract or block group where over 51 percent of the population is LMI (based on HUD income definition of un to 80 percent of the AMI)..Figure D-8 shows that most of the Citv has fewer than 50 percent of its population within LM 12rouDs. although some areas in the western portion of the city are above 50% LMI.
Revised Draft D-8 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Countywide. larger LMI concentrations are located in the central portion of the county to the west and south of Placentia. in Anaheim. Santa Ana, Arange gnd_Costa Mesa. The student population at UC Irvine has the highest percentage of poverty countywide foyer 40 percent].
Figure D-8: Low/Moderate Income Population — Placentia
AFFH Data Viewer
Ctlilonn., Depenmvm pf 1i0115iny and Conunumty Uevelopmenl AFFFI DATA AND MAPPPING RESOURCES Placentia CA USA X Q
' CTtyfrown Boundaries
111 /'//_i -i hitt
(A) Low to Moderate Income Population (HUD)
Percent Lo:rModerate Income Population
75%- 100%
■ 50% 75%
25%.504
• <25%
Figure D-9: Low/Moderate Income Population — Orange County AFFH Data Viewer
Culilornin Uejealtn.unt o} tletwa } and Community D)r elupenenl
AFFH DATA AND MAPPPING RESOURCES
Orange County, CA. USA X O
Revised Draft
D-9
County Boundaries
(A) Low to Moderate Income Population (HUD)
Percent Low Moderate Income Population
■ 75%. 100%
■ 50% 75%
■ 25% 50%
< 25%
March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
C. Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas
1! Racially/Concentrated Areas of Poverty
According to HUD, a racially or ethnically concentrated area of poverty (R./ECAPI is an area in which 50 percent or more of the population identifies as non-White and 40 percent or more of residents are living in Poverty. As shown in Figure D-10. there are no designated R/ECAP areas in Placentia. The nearest R/E'CA•P areas are in the City of Santa Ana approximately 10 miles to the south of Placentia (Figure D- 11),
Figure D-10: Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty — Placentia AFFH Data Viewer
GAA00.1),..3..9.9. I)matrn.M• 91.1109..99 ipy cpronnaylat.Molwwa AFFN DATA AND MAti Pf7NG id 50 URGES HOME 0 illi
t
VGLEUBRAdt
■
(0) Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty'R/ECAP'S' (HUD, 2009 - 2013) irxt
61M Wren
arwaug
.;r, •ie J.0 1
.111•WE09.49.
rJrx�,x f,c�r
Fiuure D-11: Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty -- Oraracre County AFFH Date Viewer
•DDD
GMren,a 11r00r0r.,9 nt I tr,0r0 anti [ r mexdnay 11....RMmr nr • Le90nd J
al•u d Yr to
Revised Draft
Na4
County Boundaries
(R) Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty'R/ECAP'S' (HUD, 2009 - 2013) Tran
0 fr.eclk4
D-10 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Recent Census estimates regarding poverty status of households in Placentia are shown in Figure D-12, As seen in this man. poverty is highest (30-40°/a) in the southwestern portion of the city. which are also the areas with an older housing stock and lower housing values. Poverty rates in Placentia are similar to the adiacent areas of Brea. Yorba Linda. Fullerton and Anaheim. The area immediately west of Placentia in the City of Fullerton with a high incidence of poverty is comprised primarily of the campus of California State University. Fullerton, and is likely influenced by the relatively low incomes of college students.
Fiaure D-12: Poverty Status - Placentia
AFFH Data Viewer
+
ctUwnia Deosnrrwrx of Hoinith0 nil Cammumryl*rekv.rr.-n AFFfr DATA AND MaPPP1NG RESOURCES HOME Tot
0,
r
fiir
leo
6121
Ji
Cuip4hJ'
I:Irp wag
atm:,
VetisUPR,tih
ty ostro ue. at es
(R) Poverty Status (ACS, 2015 - 2019) - Tract
Po'oent o' ,Ie ono 12,o, s neo., Gc. r•p- e.e
btrE vg.
■
Irk tr%, 20t
. 10..
I
0`3t;Ira¢ta6u) ` . S
Program 2.1 in the Housing Plan includes training to landlords on requirements under fair housing law, such as the acceptance of Housing Choice Vouchers. and programs such as 1.3 (Pursue County. State; and Federal Housing Funds). 1.10 (Encourage Development of Housing for Extremelv-Low-Income Households). 1.15 (Transit -Oriented Development). 1.19 (Accessory Dwelling Units). 2.2 (Section f3, Rei tal Assistance) and 2.4 (Comprehensive Housing ResourceDirectory will lte�p to expand the sunny of affordable housing to provide more options for lower-income households throughout the city.. 21 RaciailvlConcentrated Areas of Affluence
According to the Housing and Community Development AFFH Guidance Memo. "segregation is a continuum. with polarity between race. poverty. and affluence. which can be a direct Product of the sante nolicies and Practices," Therefore. both sides of the continuum must be examined. While HCD does not provide a standard definition for RCAAs and the HCD Data Viewer does not currently provide RCAA mans. available data regarding the percentage White nonulation and median household income can provide insight into racially concentrated areas of affluence.
Table D-1 eomnares the median household incomes of Whitelnnn-Hisnanic residents in Placentia and Orange County as a whole to the median incomes for the total population of the city and county. This table shows that in Placentia. the median income for non -Hispanic White households is about 4% higher Revised Draft
D-1 1 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
than for the city's nonulation as a whole. Countywide. the median income for non -Hispanic White households is about 13% higher than for the nonulation as a whole. These data suggest that there is less racial concentration of affluence in Placentia that in Orange County as a whole.
Table D-1: Median Household Income by Race — Placentia and Orange County Medis"tn Household Income
White Alone foot Hispanic)
All Households
Source: U.5. Census ACS 2015-2019
B19013 (Al
L119013H (white alone, not ilispanicl
Placentia
$99.951
$95.757
Orange County
$101.958
$90.234
D. Disparities in Access to Opportunity
11 Overview
California housing law requires cities to analyze disparities in access to onnortunity as part of the fair housing assessment. The California Tax Allocation Committee (TCACI and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD1 have developed mans showing access to various tunes of onnortunities such as education. economic. transportation. and environmental indicators. 21 Educational Opportunity
The County AIS describes disparities in access educational onnortunities across Orange County.
Countywide. there are disparities across racial/ethnic groups in access to educational opportunities as measured by the index. Across all tracts in Oranile r.rii n,tv. non-HiS,ra.nir Whites exhibit the highest exposure to educational opportunity (index score of about 591 and non-Hisnanic Asians second highest (53). Hispanics have the lowest access to these opportunities (311. with non -Hispanic Blacks in between (46).
Several iurisdictions score highly (index values at or above 601 on educational onnortunity across all racial categories. These cities include Aliso Viejo. Hunting_ ton Beach. Irvine. Laguna Niguel. La Palma.
Mission Viejo. and Rancho Santa Margarita,
Non-Hisnanic Whites in Fountain Valley have high exposure to educational onnortunity (scores of about 60). whereas Hispanics in the city do not (301. In both Fullerton and Tustin. Non -Hispanic Whites and.
Asians have much Metier access than do Blacks and Hispanics.
Jurisdictions with the highest educational opportunity also appear to have primarily large concentrations of non-Hisnanic Whites and Asian/Pacific Islanders. Irvine. Aliso Vieio. and Huntington Beach are examples of cities with large populations of those two groups. Other high onnortunity cities. by contrast annear more segregated and more heavily populated by non -Hispanic Whites. Rancho Santa Margarita and Mission Vieio are two examples of such Places.
Educational opportunity scores for Orange County are shown in Figure D-13, 5 P. 144
Revised Draft
D-12 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Figure 0-13: TCAC Educational Opuortunity Areas - Ciranae County raldnonrs 0,[1Aa1rmrrn ul1l....5i j nrW e:ornrnunirv0uwlnpmunr AFI OA1AAf+ID MAPRP1NG RESOURCES HOME .Dray=Olin.a 9S
(R) TCAC Opportunity Areas (2021) - Education Score
Educacfor, Dor.am Score (by re, ori
No Data
■ > 0 75 T More Posmve Educare, Outcomes)
050 075
11_ 0.25-050
▪ < 0.25 (Less Posm„e Educano- Ouaomes)
tLr.
. I 1 al iY i� it idi IW i
The City of Placentia is served by the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District which also serves the city of Yorba Linda. as well as nortions of Anaheim. Brea. Fullerton and rapidly developing unincorporated territory that reaches the Riverside County line. The District maintains its ren utation for academic excellence. remains fiscally solvent. and recently completed a $600 million massive facilities modernization and new school construction program.
Student enrollment for the 2021-2022 school year is roughly 24.000. The District's 34 school sites include 20 elementary schools. 5 middle schools. 1 IC -B school. 4 comprehensive Dish schools. 1 snecial education school. 1 continuation high school. 1 TK -12 home school. and 1 K-12 online school. Twenty- five schools have been designated California Distinguished Schools. eight have been named National Blue Ribbon Schools. seventeen have been honored as California Gold Ribbon Schools. one has earped the title of California Model Continuation High School. and another has received California's Exemplary Independent Study recognition. The District has been placed on the College Board's AP District Honor Roll three times since the nroeram's inception in 2011. PYLUSD Nish schools are consist, ntly named to America's Best High Schools rankings issued by Newsweek. U.S. News and World Report, and other news organizations.
As shown in Figure D-14 TCAC pr1iirational opportunity scores are highest in the northern portion of the city and lowest in the southwestern portion of the city.
Revised Draft
D-13 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Finure D-14: TCAC Educational Opportunity Areas - Placentia AFFH Data Viewer
CaGlomia Doudrimoni of I lousing and Uunmm11rtv DoVomu,noni AFFH DATA AND MAPPPING RESOURCES HOME fl Placentia CA USA
tlatt(wG1sa
(..a 12.,r �h
.:11 tun .13+}&Iihy rt s
CirylTown Baufl rias
(R) TCAC Opportunity Areas (2021) - Education Score •
Educailon Dorm., Sco,e 'eglor)
111 > 0 75: o e Pos2we Educanors Outcomes)
G 350-075
s 25 r_. 50
< 0 25 ;Less Pos .roe Educaoo - Gurco oes)
31 Economic Opportunity
In Orange County. there are significant disparities in access to economic opportunity, as seen in Figure D-15, Non -Hispanic White residents have the greatest access to economic opportunity. Asian and Pacific Islander residents (49). Native Americans (46). and Black residents (461 have lower index scores in the high to mid-40s. Hispanic residents (32) have the lowest access to economic opportunity of all racial and ethnic: groups in ()range County.
A number of iurisdictions have relatively little disparity between groups. There are high economic opportunity scores for all racial and ethnic groups in Aliso Vielo and Irvine thigh 60s to low 70s). La_ Palma also has. relatively high opportunity and little variation in scores between groups (index values ranging from 60 to 66). Huntington Beach. Laguna Niguel, Mission Viejo. and Rancho Santa Margarita have moderate economic opportunity scores for all racial/ethnic groups (scores from the mid-40s to mid -50s1.
Economic Opportunity index scores are eenetally lower in North Orange County than in South County.
Scores are especially low in Westminster. Garden Grove. and much of Santa Ana and Anaheim. Scores are generally high in much of Irvine. La Palma. and Tustin and along the coast from Newport Beach to Laguna Niguel as well as in unincorporated areas near the eastern border with Riverside County.
Areas in Orange County with the highest index scores tend to have lame concentrations of non- Hispanic ,and Asian residents. By contrast, areas with the highest concentration of Hispanic residents tend to have lower economic index scores. Cities such as Fullerton and Costa Mesa are examples of localities with. segregated living patterns and significant disparities between racial and ethnic groups. Neighborhoodl in these cities with higher Hispanic populations score lower than neighborhoods that are heavily populated by non -Hispanic and Asian residents,
Re Draft D-14 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Figure D-15: TCAC Economic Opportunity — DranaeCounty
AFFH Data Viewer
f'alllopiu rkap,pIt mmol Ilsni:Ir„r ar•d Cu,1ununsvilar nnsrrra �� Orange County CA, USA X O
AFFH DATA AND MAPPPING RESOURCES HOME
ounty :our. ares
(R) TCAC Opportunity Areas (2021) - Economic Score
Economic Doman Score (by reg.n7
h1 No Data
' 0 75 (More Posrve Econom,c Outcome)
0 50 0,75
025-050
< 0 25 grass Poor ve [cocoon', Ouccomel
161,44 (tiii1d MIA uIn
Rtr, ein:
In Placentia. the hiehest economic onnortunitv scores are in the northern and eastern portions of the city (Figure D-161. These disparities are similar to those for educational opportunity scores.
Figure D-16: TCAC Economic O000rtunity — Placentia
AFFH Data Viewer
uhiornU tlupsnntnn of I Ietnir'51 .•ral[51 iw.rn,nlrrlor,. AFFH DATA AND MAPPPING RESOURCES HOME.
Placentia, CA, USA X
S -, , t, �• Placene
Revised Draft
rty oeri aura«os
(R)TCAC Opportunity Areas (2021) - Economic Score •
Econome Doman Score (by region)
P.- No Data
- 0.75 (More Poor.ve Ecom „, Oocowe)
050 0,75
025 050
< 0 25 (Less Posnve Economic Ourcome7
D-15 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
41 Transportation Opportunities
According to the County Al. low transportation cost index scores as well as transit index scores are generally higher in North Orange County than in South Orange County. Scores are generally higher in jurisdictions with greater levels of density. In Placentia. proximity to the SR -57 and SR -91 freeways.
OCTA bus routes and the Metrolink light rail system provide access to many transit options. The new Placentia Metrolink station is conveniently located at Melrose Avenue and Crowther Avenue near the Orange Freeway (SR -571. serving the communities of Anaheim. Fullerton. Placentia. and Yorha Linda.
The Placentia Station serves the Metrolink 91 Line that extends to Riverside. Fullerton. and Downtown Los Angeles. OCTA and the City of Placentia are also constructing a new shared -use mufti -story narking_ structure to provide increased travel options for riders. 51 Environ mental Opnortunities
The County Al notes that there are disparities across racial/ethnic grouns in access to environmental opportunities. measured as lowerexnosure to and effects from pollution (Figure D-171. Across all tracts in Orange County. non-Hisnanic Whites exhibit the highest access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods (index score of about 541. All other racial/ethnic grouns obtain lower index scores in the 40s: Hispanics score lowest at 41. followed by non -Hispanic Blacks f451, non -Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander (471. and non -Hispanic Native American 1481.
Several iurisdictions score esnecially highly on environmental onnortunity across all racial categories.
Laguna Niguel. Aliso Vieio. Mission Vieio. and Rancho Santa Margarita all have index scores in the 70s to 905 for all racial and ethnic groans. Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach also have higher access to environmental health. scoring in the 50s to low -70s on the index. Other cities are low -scoring across the board. Orange City. La Habra. and Fullerton are the least environmentally healthy. with index scores in the 20s. Anaheim. Buena Park. Irvine. Santa Ana. and Westminster also have low access to environmental opportunity. scoring in the 30s to 40s on the index. jurisdictions with the highest environmental onnortunity annear to have primarily large concentrations of non -Hispanic Whites and Asian/Pacific Islanders. Laguna Niguel. AIiso Vieio. Fountain Valley. and Huntington Beach are good examples of cities with large nor}ulations of those two groups. Other high opportunity cities. by contrast appear more segregated and more heavily populated by non -Hispanic Whites. Rancho Santa Margarita. and Mission Vieio are two examples of such places.
Lower -scoring cities exhibit a diversity of residential patterns. For example. Orange (city) has concentrations of both Hispanics and non -Hispanic Whites. Similarly, Fullerton has concentrations of Hispanic neighborhoods as well as non -Hispanic Whites and Asian/Pacific Islanders. Anaheim and La Habra follow a similar pattern. By contrast. Santa Ana is a city with low environmental quality that is characterized almost exclusively by dense concentrations of Hispanics.
Revised Draft
D-16 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fiaure D-17: TCAC Environmental Opportunity - Oranae County Q: AFFH Data Viewer
Orange County. CA. USA X
ral;f •r IAgnrrrnmur tit Itnuung and (Awl rrumvy 11.wrdnlimnnl AF FtI DATA AND MAPPPING RESOURCES HOME til
: F unr,
. !': .F LY�VT'.' ,rte • §1117d"rl5 ❑
ounty
oun•anes
(R)TCAC Opportunity Areas (2021) - Environmental Score
r Envno, mental Doman, Score
No Data
II75 1 ;More Pos.ve Env.ronmenlaI Outcomes)
k 50' 75
25 50
` c 25 (less Pos,ove Env,on mens) O:acomes)
In Placentia. the highest environmental opportunity scores are fund in the central portion of the city {Figure D-18) while neighborhoods in the southwestern and northeastern portions of the citv show lower scores.
Fiaure D-18: TCAC Environmental Opportunity - Placentia AFFH Data Viewer
Callla.rea iRryrurtrnae1.of Boutin{) ami Community tiawtuprsvor AFFH DATA AND MAPPPfNG RESOURCES HOME Revised Draft
(R) TCAC Opportunity Areas (2021) - Environmental Score Env.ronmenrel Domain Score
Fi No Data
■. 75. 1 (More Pos r.ve Enmoonmental Outcomes)
-50 - 75
El',2 25 - 50
■ < 251 Less Posmve Env,ro• menrel Outcomes)
D-17 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
6) Disadvantaaed Communities
Senate Bill 1000 fSB 1000) requires cities with designated disadvantaged communities to include environmental iustice goals and policies in the General Plan. Per SB 1000. the California EPA uses Call;nviroScreen. a napping tool to identify disadvantaged communities. CalEnviroScreen examines various indicators to characterize pollution and socioeconomic factors. As seen in Figure D-19 below, two areas in the southeastern portion of Placentia are classified as disadvantaged communities. The Placentia General Plan includes policies to address environmental iustice consistent with SB 1000.
Fiaure D-19: Disadvantaged Communities — Placentia
AFFI-I Data Viewer
Placentia, CA, USA X Q
t:alirenik I) panmenl of limning nrtd [:trmnntniry[Yavalopnumf ,ho, ;e Plaeenti
61/
-11r-
'+1
C!]
1.462a,051
rtt$+
E3
J!iGi1'�i11
AFFH DATA AND MAPPPING RESOURCES
Itv OWR
b
Bnun
(A) SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities
E. Disproportionate Housina Needs and Displacement Risk The AFFH Rule Guidebook f24 C.F.R. S 5.152) defines "dispronortionate !musing needs" as "a condition in which there are significant disparities in the proportion of members of protected class experiencing a category of housing needs when compared to the proportion of a member of any other relevant groups or the total population experiencing the category of housing need in the anplicable geographic area," The analysis is completed by assessing cost burden, severe cost burden. overcrowd ins, and substanda:j1 housing. in addition. this analysis examines homelessness and displacement risk. 1) Cost Burden fOveraavmentl
A household is considered cost -burdened if it spends more than 30 percent of its income in housing costs. including utilities. Reducing housing cost burden can also help foster more inclusive communities and increase access to opportunities for persons of color. Persons with disabilities, and other Protected classes.
Revised Draft
D-18 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Overnavment is a Problem for many Placentia residents. narticularly for lower-income households.
According to recent HUD estimates (Figure D-20) approximately 2.940 renter households f50% of all renters) and 3.260 owner households (30% of all owners) were paving more than 30% of income for housing. The highest rates of overnavment occur among veru -low-income and extremeiv-low-income households. The impact of housing overpayment on lower income households is narticularly significant for special needs populations - seniors. persons with disabilities. and female -headed households with children.
Fiaure D-20: Cost Burden by Tenure and Income Cateaory - Placentia Income by Cost Burden (Renters ony)
Household Income less -thin or= 3096 HAMFI
Household Income >30% to less -than or= 501/4
HAMFI
Household Income >50% to less -than or= 80%
HAMFI
Household Income >80% to less -than or= 100% 295 855
HAMFI
Household Income >100% HAMFI 80 1,575
Cost burden Cost burden >
> 30% 50%
845 765 1,015
850 465 1,015
870 195 1,360
Total 2,940 1,445 5,825
Cost burden Cost burden >
> 30% 515%
Household Income Tess -than or= 30% HAMFI 605 400 865
Household Income 330% to Tess -than or= 50%
HAMFI
Household Income >50% to less -than or= 80%
HAMFI
Household Income >80% to less -than or= 100%
HAMFI 465 65 1,115
Household Income >100% HAMFI 975 30 6,320
I Total 3,260 1,010 10,750
Income by Cost Burden (Owners only)
Total
345 170 695
870 345 1,750
As shown in Figure D-21. overnavment among renters is most nrevalent in the central and southern jortions of the city. When compared to conditions in other areas of Orange County (Figure D-22) overnavment among Placentia renters appears be similar to adiacent communities.
Revised Draft
D-19 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fiaure D-21: Renters Overoavina for Housina - Placentia t�l,tnrnra l Nswrmninlr}I lnunry andtbernri4y I1wHlgnnmi AFrH DATA 19C MAF0F1Ni: R[ SUt1RCF S 1105b1 M'+se"'. Nt 1
Figure D-22: Renters Overpayina For Housina - Oranae County : AFFH Data Viewer
r_aanonoa Depaiiri u011100+011 0dc011nnniry Devo/un0n0t Legend County Boundaries
(0) Overpayment by Renters (ACS, 2015 • 2019) - Tract
Overnavment among Placentia homeowners is highest in the central and southwestern portions of the city (Figure D-231. Countvwide. rates of overpayment among homeowners in Placentia appear similar to other communities.
The nrohlerns of overpayment. are addressed i n the H i?5k9e Plan through efforts to facilitate production. and preservation of affordable housing (see Program 1.3: Pursue County. State. and Federal Housing Funds. Program 1.8: Adeouate Sites For Housing p ye)ppment. Program 1.10: Encourage Development of Housing for Extremely -Low -Income Households. Program 1.11: Density Bonus Ordinance. Program
1.13: Development of Housing for Larger Families. Program 2.2: Section 8 Rental Assistance. Proerain
2.4: Comprehensive Housing Resource Directory. Provram 3.5: Monitor and Preserve At -Risk Units, Program 4.1: Partnerships with the Housing lndustrvt.
Revised Draft
D-20 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
pure 0-23: Homeowners Overpaying for Housing - Placentia AFFH Data Viewer
CaMom. I trpaemnm n1 IlmianR and Cnmmunny unvrinpmeni
Arr) I DATA AND MAPPPING RCSOURCCS I IOMC
sass platriaM-
I-
T 1)1
nrS
rsr(ni s naaolx.r,n
Im
(R) Overpayment by Home Owners (ACS, 2015 - 2019) - Tract More _u_e ,_ h ew e
lr� •.
2.5 4-;.
4 EA
Figure D-24: Homeowners Overpaying for Housina — Oranae County (R) Overpayment by Homo Owners (ACS, 2015 - 2019) • Tract •
2) Overcrowding
Overcrowding" is defined as a housing unit occupied by more than 1.01 persons per room fe'xclu it kitchens, porches. and hallways). A unit with more than 1.51 occupants ner room is considered "severely overTr•uwcled." The incidence of overcrowded housing is a general measure of whether there is an available supply of adequately sized housing units. Overcrowding is also related to overpayment, because households may not he able to afford a large enough home to accommodate their needs, Overcrowding on lead to a variety of other problems such as lower educational performance among children, psychological stress and adverse heal ill impacts.
Revised Draft
D-21 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
The County Al reported that for Orange County as a whole, White residents experience an overcrowding. rate of 1.95%. Black residents 6.52%. Native American residents 11.38%. Asian American or Pacific islander residents 7.76%. and Hispanic residents 25.72%. Hispanic residents face especially high rates of overcrowding. This is especially true in Anaheim and Santa Ana. where their rates of overcrowding are 29.07% and 42.93%. respectively. Overcrowding in Orange County is illustrated in Figure D-26, In Placentia. the highest rates of overcrowding occur in the southwestern portion of the city (Figure D- 25), which are also the areas with higher percentages of minority residents.
The problems of overcrowding are addressed in the Housing Plan through efforts to facilitate production and preservation of affordable housing (see Program 1.3: Pursue County, State. and Federal 1 -lousing Funds. Program 1.8: Adeauate Sites for Housing Development. Program 1.10: Encourage Development of Housing for Extremely -Low -Income Households. Program 1.11: Density Bonus Ordinance. Program.
1.13: Development of Housing for Larger Families. Program 2.2: Section 8 Rental Assistance. Program
2.4: Comprehensive Housing Resource Directory, Program 3.5: Monitor and Preserve At -Risk Units, Program 4.1: Partnerships with the Housing Industry).
Figure D-25: Overcrowded Households - Placentia
AFFH Data Viewer
Calilrnnia Dep.lnmam nl I Imrsinn and Common./1y Devolopmonl AFFH DATA AND MAPPPING RESOURCES ePlacentia, CA, USA
C12°11 Lal
0 (
x Q.
ateat000llt1
L .--/ 1 —CItyirown Boun3ares
rte"...
: (R) Overcrowded Households (CHHS) - Tract
thll
Pe/cent al o•.erc,o.,ded ro..iseho'ds
205
V.urylL+':NL'Q..
15.01. 20%
•12 01% I5%
[ 83,0.12%
' S82%(Statew/deAye/ age
;
VeritoMAD
f.�
r
nosanatirr -
itap—
f-C�rn u•: In no• n.•
11 / 1511/. 131115 I).•yl i•
Revised Draft
r1�
D-22 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Figure D-26: Overcrowded Householcis — Oran ie County
C;illlr>rn[a Inporlrnant of Iluu+lii. mid Community D vlrlopmnnl Legend
0.1115
County Boundaries
(R) Overcrowded Households (CH HS) - Tract
Percent of Overc onded Households
.I O% 2pt
kb 12.O1% tE%
83%•12%
Mi11.2.%1Srmrwidn Aiikroorl
3) Substandard Housing
The age of a housing unit is often an indicator of housing_conditions. Housing units without proper maintenance can deteriorate over time. Housing units built before 1970 are the most likely to need rehabilitation and to have lead-based paint in deteriorated condition. Lead-based paint becomes hazardous to children under age six and to pregnant women when it peels off walls or is pulverized by windows and doors opening and closing.
Housing over 50 years old is considered aged and is more likely to exhibit a need for maior repairs.
Additionally. older units may not be built to currer t building stanglards for fire and earthgnake safety.
The age of housing units in Placentia compared to the SCAG region as a whole is shown in Figure D-27.
Nearly two-thirds of Placentia's housing units were constructed prior to 1980 and are nDw more than 40 years old. These findings suggest that there may he a substantial need for maintenance and rehabilitation. including remediation of lead-based paint. Based upon field observations of City building inspectors and code enforcement staff, it is estimated there are more than 200 substandard housing units currently in the City. which are primarily concentrated in the La folia and Santa Fe areas. Less than 5% of those (10 unitsl are estimated to have structural problems that are not feasible to repair and therefore are in need of total replacement. Housing programs to assist lower-income households with needed repairs are described in Chapter 4 and include Program 3.1: Community Based Neighborhood Rehabilitation and Program 3.3: Placentia Rehabilitation Grant Program.
Revised Draft
D-23 March 2022.October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Figure D-27: Ape of Housing Units Placentia vs. SCAG Region Percent of Total Units
35%
30%
255%
5;6
ill
20%
1 hill!
15%
10'!
5 /nMOM j_1J
2014 & 2010- 2000- 1990- 1980- 1970- 1960- 1950 1940- 1939 & Later 2013 2009 1999 1989 1919 1969 1959 1949 Earlier
Placentia (%) 0 2% 1 3% 8 5% 14 4% 11 2% 28 6% 25 0% 6 6% 1 3% 2 8% SCAG (%) 10% 1 5% 10 1% 9 5% 15 0% 16 3% 14 5% 15 9% 6 9% 9 3% ■ Placentia (%) r SCAG (%)
American Community Survey 2014-2018 5 -year estimates.
41 Homelessness
The Orange County homeless _population includes many working families and individuals who live in cars. parks. under bridges. in motels and in homeless shelters trying to maintain their dignity while they struggle to survive. As a result. most homeless remain hidden. The most recent available Orange County Point -in -Time Count and Survey report of the Homeless 1.20191 reported 55 unsheltered and 108 sheltered homeless persons in Placentia.
Regional strategies to combat homelessness are developed through Orange County's Continuum of Care, System. The goal of the Continuum of Care Strategic Plan is to work toward a seamless system of care through advocacy. homeless prevention. outreach and assessment. emergency shelter. transitional shelter and permanent affordable housing.
Persons threatened with homelessness are often those with incomes at 30% of area median income or below who are paying more than 30% of their income for rent, The nonprofit 2-1-1 ❑range County organization is a 24 -hours -a -day. 7 days -a -week. toll-free number that people in need of assistance can call to obtain comnrehensive information and referrals to health and human services. Available services include food. shelter. government assistance nrograms. urgent care. substance abuse and treatment programs. and workforce development.
In early 2019 the North Orange County Service Planning Area for Homelessness Outreach Efforts had reached an important milestone. A regional nartnershin of 13 cities located in northern Orange County (Anaheim. Brea. Buena Park. Cvnress. Fullerton. La 1 -labra. La Palma. Los Alamitos. Orange. Placentia, Stanton. Villa Park. and Yorba Linda' came together to share intelligence and resources to address regional homelessness. Their concept was to promote greater regional coordination on homeless issues while reducing the sn ifcontrol regarding working with the County of Orange and others.
Revised Draft
D-24 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
After months of extensive discussions. negotiations and assessments. two locations within the North Orange County Service Planning Area were identified for the development of "navigation centers" based an a number of factors including zoning proximity to related services and site availability. The navieation centers are a multi-iurisdictional approach to guiding underserved residents back into society by increasing access to a shelter with basic needs. health and iob resources. and opportunities to reunite with friends and family. Each center was nlanned to accommodate 100 beds. thereby increasing the regional bed count to 525 additional beds available to homeless individuals in conjunction with a project in the city of Anaheim that accommodated 325 new beds.
Funding for the Navigation Centers was secured through annlication and governmental meetings with state. regional. county and local officials resulting in the $12 million in State of California Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP) funds dedicated for the site acquisitions and construction of the navigation centers. Each of the North Orange County Service Planning Area cities also committed funds for construction and ongoing operation of the navigation centers. A Memorandum of Understanding was prepared and presented to the city councils of all 13 cities in May 2019. Construction began in 2019 and the opening of the first 100 -bed Navigation Center in Placentia occurred on March 31. 2020. This groundbreaking success story was born of the regional need and nublic official desire to come together to address homelessness and pioneer the way to create and overate a multi-iurisdictional homelessness facility. Program 1.4: Emergency Shelters. Low Barrier Navigation Centers. Transitional and Sunnortive Housing and Agricultural Employee Housing. Program 1.14: Housing for Persons with Special Needs. and Program 2.3: Minimize Constraints on Housing for Persons with Disabilities are included in the Housing Plan to describe actions the City is taking to address the issue of homelessness. 51 Displacement Risk
In 2016. the UCLA Urban Displacement Proiect6 team developed a neighborhood change database to heln stakeholders better understand where neighborhood transformations are occurring and to identify areas that are vulnerable to gentrification and displacement in Southern California. The database includes Los Angeles. Orange. and San Diego counties. with gentrification and sociodentographic indicators based on data from the Census Bureau American Community Survey and shows whether each Census tract gentrified between 1990 and 2000: gentrified between 2000 and 2015: gentrified during both of these periods or exhibited characteristics of a"disadvantaged" tract that did not gentrify between 1990 and 2015.
Based an this neighborhood change database. the UCLA team found that of the three counties. Orange Countv exhibited the greatest share of neighborhoods that were considered to he "disadvantaged" and potentially susceptible to gentrification (-43%1.
The areas most susceptible to .displacement in northern Orange County are portions of Buena Park.
Fullerton. Anaheim and Garden Grove. The eastern. south and coastal communities are primarily exclusive or at risk of becoming exclusive. Figure D-28 shows the displacement typology levels for Placentia and adjacent areas. The northern portion of the city and the area near Alta Vista Country Club are identified as "Stable/Advanced Exclusive" while other areas in the western portion of the city are considered "Stable ModeratelMixerl Income" or "Low Income/Susceptible to Displacement." littp:// www.orbandisplacernent.nrg /mans /los-angeles•gentrifica time-and-disnl acement/ Re Draft D-25 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Figure 0-28: Displacement Tvpoioaies - Placentia
Los Angeles - ventriFication and Displacement
L. Habra
gioa
FULLERTON
ANAHEIM
er.er.il•.
atom m.++w+An�wTnmgniverrY�xes r.vxtsdwum+e�k'Lx.q... i bW .
OH pinworm! Typology
LoW.IncomOISuaceptible to Displacement
Ongoing Displacement
Al Risk of GonInhceaon
1 Early/Ongoing Gentrification
Advanced Gentrification
Stable Moderate'Mixed Income
At Risk of Becoming Exclusive
Becoming Exclusive
Slable'Advanced Exclusive
High Student Population
unavailable of unreliable Data
Bispacement 7ypniogy
Neighbor.. Segregation
I I Renewed adios
Oppon:miry ZOrie]
I 110,16119
1 universities & co eges
As noted in the Housing Plan. Program 1.8: Adeauate Sites For Housing Development includes a commitment to ensure compliance with legal protections and replacement housing reciuirements for existing tenants who may he displaced by new developments.
As discussed in Section 2.3 of the Housing Needs Assessment. there is one assisted low-incgrne housing development in Placentia — Imperial Villas -- that is at risk of conversion to market rate in the next 100 years. Program 3.5: Monitor and Preserve Affordable Housing At -Risk of Conversion to Market Rate is included in the Housing Plan to facilitate the preservation of these affordable units.
3. Sites Inventory Analysis
The City's inventory of sites for potential housing is presented in Appendix B. As summarized in Table 8-1. the inventory is comprised of approved projects. vacant sites, non -vacant underutilized sites and future ADUs. The sites analysis shows that as with most cities in the metro areas of Southern California. vacant developable land is veru rare and underutilized sites provide the majority of future housing capacity,
As illustrated in Figures B-2 through 13-5 in Appendix 8. the focus of the Placentia sitts inventory is on redevelopment of underutilized sites in the commercial and light industrial areas near the new 1Jv t,.rolinkrail station. While most of these sites are within areas designated by the TCAC/HCD importunity mans as Low Resource or High Segregation and Poverty. they provide the most significant potential for new housing develooment because most other areas are developed with stable residential neighborhoods with minimal potential for redevelopment.
Revised Draft
D-26 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fiaure 0-29: TCAC Opportunity Areas Composite Score - Placentia 1`ya' AFFH Data Viewer
f::liifurnia IMpiaiMani . k,ouml awl [,.{I 1 Iwrlay Ik+vnlupnr. r 1 AFFH DATA ANO MAPPPING RESOURCES HOME City/ ownit nindaries
b
(R) TCAC Opportunity Areas (2021)- Composite Score
` rgnesr Pe sou ce
1111 Hgh Resource
VIoaerste Resowce ;Rs, rdy l:nar g r ‘_fl
ti Moderare Resowce
! r:, Re$,..,c.
I•,ah Segreca,n & Po,e,t7
h+ ss,"g-I�surf,o err
Data
While former commercial and light industrial areas provide the largest component of the potential_ residential inventory, it is important to recognize that existing residential neighborhoods also provide substantial potential for new housing in areas of higher onnortunity through ADUs and SB 9 urban lot splits.
4. Contributing Factors
The housing element must include an identification and prioritization of significant contributing factors to s gregatian. racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty. disparities in access to opportunity, and disnronortionate housing needs. "Fair housing contributing factor" means a factor that creates, contributes to. perpetuates. or increases the severity of one or more fair housing issues. Contributing factors should be based on all the prior efforts and analyses: outreach. assessment of fair housing, and. site inventory. Contributing factors mustalso be prioritized in terms of needed impact on fair housing choice and strongly connect to goals and actions.
Through the Participation of stakeholders. fair housing advocates. and the assessment of fair housing issues described in this appendix, the City has identified fair housing issues and contributing factors as well as meaningful actions to address those issues as described in Table D-2: Fair Housing Issues, Contributing Factors and Meaningful Actions.
5. Goals. Policies and Actions
Based upon the analysis presented above. the City has identified fair housing issues. contributing factors, and meaningful actions that will be taken to address those issues during the planning period. The 2020- 2024 Orange County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice prepared by the Urban County consortium. of which Placentia is a particir)ating jurisdiction. was of key importance in helping to identify these issues. contributing factors and actions.
Revised Draft
D-27 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Table D-2: Fair Housina issues. Contributing Factors and Meaninaful Actions Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factor Priority
Fair Housing Outreach 1. Lack of lural private fair houaipg outreach and enforcement High may be a significant contributing factor to fair housing issues in QrangeJ pity. Although Orange County is served by two hig11 nuality private. non-profit fair housing_ocganizations. they arg underfunded and understaffed in comparison to the total need For their services. Victims of discrimination would he more able to exercise their rights. thus deterring future discrimination. if the capacity of existing organizations grew to meet the scale of the problem.
2. Lack of local public fair housing not -reach and enforcement may also he a significant contributing factor to fair housing issues €n Orange_County. There are no local public entities that conduct fair housing nutreprh anti enforcementwith the C:al.ifnrnia Depart- ment of Fair Employment and Housin° anei HUD constituting the only nuhlic enforcement bodies that operate in Orange County.
Advocates across Orange Count and the state of California have reporter) issues with the timeline of the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing's investigations and the standards that it applies in making nrobable cause determinations. A local nuhlic enforcement agency. if created. would have the potential to be more responsive to victims of discrimination in Orange County than either the state or HUD
Access to Opportunity Lack of access to opportunity due to high housing costs may he a High s,,t'enifirant contrihuting factor to fair housing issues in Orange ounty. in Placentia. while access to auality transportation and ecational resources is generally pend rhrni}ghnair the r_fty the western portjons oFthe county have lower economic argl. environmental opportunity than do the central and northern areas. Increasing housing affordability in those areas would make it easier for low-income households to access the tunes of services and amenities that further social mobility.
Revised Draft
Meaningful Action
The r'itjy will continue to disseminate information regarding fair hosing in a variety of locations including City Hall. the City website and the library. and conduct ongoing, proactive putreach to engage members of all socio-economic groups and recruit members of underrenresented erouns to narticinate in City meetings.
The City will continue to seek funding to support the Fair Housing Council of Orange County (FHCOCI. whish provides community education. individual counseling. mediation. and low-cost advocacy with the expressed goal of eliminating housing discrimination and Quaranteeine the rights of all neople to freely choose the housing for which they aualifv in the area they desire.
The City will invite FHCOC to conduct annual Fair housing outreach targeted to Placentia residents and landlords. (Program 2.1)
The Citv will seek to improve access to opportunity in the following ways:
Program HE -1.2: Locate Housing Near Transnortatiorl.
Employment and Services
To increase livability within new housing developments. the City sha]l encourage and coordinate the location of maior housing developments, particularly affordable housing and multi -family units. near transportation options. maior employment centers and services.
Program HE -1.3: Pursue County . State. and Federal Housing Funds
D-28 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factor
Priority
Meaningful Action
Monitor availability of counv. state. and federal housing programs and pursue available funds on an annual basis.
Program HE -1.8: Adeouate Sites for Housing Development To ensure the availability of adeauate sites to accommodate the City's assigned housing need. the City will rezone additional land to accommodate the shortfall of lower-income sites comnared to the RHNA allocation in all income categories. as identified in Annendix 8. The City shall encourage the development of housing through financial incentives fsuch as land write-downs; assistance with on- or off-site infrastructure costs. fee waivers. or deferrals to the extent feasible): expedited entitlement review: in-kind technical assistance: and other regulatory, concessions or incentives. and Dravide incentives for lot consolidation.
Program HE -1.11: Density Bonus Ordinance
The City provides incentives and concessions to facilitate development of lower-income housing units through its Density Bonus Ordinance. To ensure that City regulations are consistent with recent changes to Stare law. the City will nrocess an amendment to the ordinance in 2022.
Program HE -1.15: Transit -Oriented Development
Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) is a compact mixed-use or commercial area designed to maximize access to piablih
transoort. and often incorporates features to encourage transit ridership. Consistent with federal. state and regional policies focusing on concentrated growth around transit. in 2017 the City Council adopted the TOD Packing House zoning district. which allows densities un to 95 du /acre near the future Metrolink Station. Since then. 633 multi -family units hay been entitled in the TDD District. Also in 2017. the Old Town tonin District was adopted. which includes a sub -area allowing high density housing by -right up to 65 units per acre. Development incentives include the utilization of City -owned property as well, as reduced narking requirements. financial assistance. density, bonus. and regulatory waivers. To expand housing
Revised Draft D-29 March 2O220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fair Housing Issue
Affordable Housing
Preservation
Contributing Factor
The loss of affordable housing may be a significant contributing factor to fair housing issues in Orarge County_ when subsidy contracts expire. the housingproviders that often have the least econonlic3ncentive to renew their affordability restrictions are those that are located in higher onnortunity areas or in areas that are gentrifying nr at risk of gentrification. in Placentia. there is one subsidized low-income development that could expire in the next 10 years. The loss of these affordable units could contribute to segregation and displacement.
Priority
Meaningful Action
opnortnnities. an amendment to the TOD zone will nrocessesi to extend the district as described in Program 1,8 and Appendix B.
Program HE -I.19: Accessary Dwelling Units
Accessory dwelling units (also known as ADUs.ecorld units or granny flats) can help to adrir 1 a nnrtjnn of rje citv's housing needs. particularly for small lower-income households. The City will continue to monitor legislatipn and revise regulations as necessary to ensure conformance with current law. in addition, the City will explore and pursue ADI! funding annually. modify deveIopment standards and reduce fees beyond the minimum reouirements of State law. nrenare ore -approved mans. and provide homeawner/applicant assistance tools,.
Pr,-_ivrm HE -4.1: Partnerships with the Housing Industry J'he City has limited resources rn 11CP fpr the development and maintenance of affordable housing. To maximize its funding and staff resources. the City shall seek opportunities to nartner with nen-profit and for-nrollt housing developers. Specifically. the City shall proactively seek partnerships to develon affordable housing and contribute to the pattnershin through activities such as in-kind technical assistance. sunnort in seeking grant and funding importunities. and financial assistance which may include land write-downs and assistance with on- nr off-site jnfrastructur_e cnstq where feasible, The Citv will cont�tr affordable housing organizations annually to solicit interest in development.
Program HE -3.$: Monitor and Preserve Affordable Housing At - Risk of Conversion to Market Rate
The City shall continue to monitor units with affordability covenants that are eligible to expire during the next 10 years. TQ enccuray rhe r 4'servation of these Thr -risk" units the City shall coordinate with the Comity and non -p slit housing
organizations to encourage the extension and /or renewal of deed restrictions or covenants.. comply with noticing
requirements. provide education and assistance to tenants„ assist with funding. and promptly reach nut to oualified entities. jn nreservi at -risk housing units.
Revised -Draft D-30 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factor
Availability of Affordable Lack of affordable. accessible housing in a ranee of unit sizes may Housing be a significant contributingjctor to fair housing issues in Orange County. As discussed in connection with several other contributing factors, there is a general shortage of affordable housing in the county. This shortage has a Particular effect on low-income families in which at least one member has a disability that reouires accessibility features. and persons with disabilities who renuire the services of live-in aides.
Revised Draft
Priority Meaningful Action
High All of the meaningful actions described above address this issue, In addition. the following prograrn specifically addresses the #due of housing fnersnns with disabilities.
Prom HE -1.12• Development of Senior Housing
Seniors typically have specialized housing npPrls and fixed incomes that may require housing units not generally included in market rate hoUsine. In 2020 the City Council approved entitlements for a 64 -unit affnrdablsenior ihQusing
develonment at 1314 N. Angelina Drive. The Cityshallsontin i . to encourage the development of a wide range of housing choices for seniors through incentives fe.g... financial assistance, parking reductions. regulatory waivers). These may include independent living communities and assisted living facilities with on-site services and access to health care. nutrition, transportation and other appropriate services,
Program 1-1E-1.13: Development of Housing for Larger Families Providing appropriately sizedhovsine units for large families is important to imnroving livability. reducing instances of overernwriing and minimizing deferred maintenance issues. The Otv shall enrnu,r ge incorporation of units with 3 or more bedrooms in for -sale and rental housing developments to accommodate the needs of larger families through activities aich as technical assistance. expedited processing. and flexibility in develonment standards.
Program HE -1.14: Housing for Persons with Special Needs Housing to accommodate persons and families with special needs is a high priority for Placentia. In 2018 the City approved, the Veteran's Village development tvitIi49Irene-low-income units for veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness..
The nrniert also provides services such as vocational training, mental health counseling. lob placement. etc. The City shall continue toworkwirh npn-profit housing developers service providers and the County of Orange to encourage and su quart the development of housing for special needs households, including persons with developmental disabilities. through activities such as technicjl assistance. assistance in seeking.
D-31 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fair Housing issue Contributing Factor
Revised Draft
Priority
Meaningful Action
funding annually. expedited Processing and flexibility in development standards.
Program HE -2.3: Minimize Constraints on Housing for Persons with Disabilities
The City will continue to implement the Reasonable
Accommodation Ordinance. which provides relief from local regulations and permitting procedures that may have a
discriminatory effect on housing for persons with disabilities. In addition. a Zonirje Ordinance amendment will be processed in 2022 to update the d€ f nition of "family' consistent with State law
0-32 March 20220ctobcr 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix E: Glossary
Appendix E: Glossary
Revised Draft
Above Moderate -Income Household. A household with an annual income greater than 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) adjusted by household size, as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
Apartment. An apartment is one or more rooms in an apartment house or dwelling occupied or intended or designated for occupancy by one family for sleeping or living purposes and containing one kitchen.
Assisted Housing. Generally multi -family rental housing, but sometimes single-family ownership units, whose construction, financing, sales prices, or rents have been subsidized by federal, state, or local housing programs.
Below -market -rate (BMR). Any housing unit specifically priced to be sold or rented to Low- or Moderate -Income households for an amount less than the fair -market value of the unit. Both the State of California and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development set standards for determining which households qualify as "Low - Income" or "Moderate -Income." May also refer to the financing of housing at less than prevailing interest rates.
Build -out. That level of urban development characterized by full occupancy of all developable sites in accordance with the General Plan; the maximum level of development envisioned by the General Plan.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). A grant program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on a formula basis for entitlement communities and by counties or the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for non -entitled jurisdictions. This grant allots money to cities and counties for housing rehabilitation and community development, including public facilities and economic development.
Condominium. A type of ownership in which the interior space is individually owned and the balance of the property (both land and building) is owned in common by the owners of the individual units. (See "Townhouse.")
Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). A term used to describe private restrictive limitations that may be placed on property and its use, and which usually are made a condition of holding title or lease.
Density Bonus. The allocation of development rights that allow a parcel to accommodate additional square footage or residential units beyond the maximum for which the parcel is zoned, usually in exchange for the provision of affordable housing at the same site or at another location.
E-1 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix E: Glossary
Density, Residential. The number of residential dwelling units per acre of land.
Densities specified in the General Plan may be expressed in units per gross acre or per net developable acre.
Developable Land. Land that is suitable as a location for structures.
Down Payment. Money paid by a buyer from his own funds, as opposed to that portion of the purchase price that is financed.
Duplex. A detached building under single ownership that is designed for occupation as the residence of two families living independently of each other.
Dwelling Unit (du). A building or portion of a building containing one or more rooms, designed for or used by one family for living or sleeping purposes, and having a separate bathroom and only one kitchen or kitchenette. See Housing Unit.
Elderly Housing. Typically, small apartments or condominiums designed to meet the needs of persons 62 years of age and older or, if more than 150 units, persons 55 years of age and older, and restricted to occupancy by them.
Emergency Shelter. Temporary housing with minimal supportive services for homeless persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or less by a homeless person. No individual or household may be denied emergency shelter because of an inability to pay. [California Health and Safety Code §50801(e)] Extremely Low -Income Household. A household with an annual income equal to or less than 30% of the area median income adjusted by household size, as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)or the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
Fair Market Rent. The rent, including utility allowances, determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for purposes of administering the Section 8 Program.
Family. (1) Two or more persons related by birth, marriage, or adoption [U.S. Bureau of the Census]. (2) An individual or a group of persons living together who constitute a bona fide single housekeeping unit in a dwelling unit, not including a fraternity, sorority, club, or other group of persons occupying a hotel, lodging house or institution of any kind.
General Plan. A comprehensive, long-term plan mandated by State Planning Law for the physical development of a city or county and any land outside its boundaries which, in its judgment, bears relation to its planning. The plan shall include seven required elements: land use, circulation, open space, conservation, housing, safety, and noise.
The plan must include a statement of development policies and a diagram or diagrams illustrating the policies.
Goal. A general, overall, and ultimate purpose, aim, or end toward which the City will direct effort.
Revised Draft E-2 March 2022Octobi
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix E: Glossary
Revised Draft
Green Building. Green or sustainable building is the practice of creating healthier and more resource -efficient models of construction, renovation, operation, maintenance, and demolition. (US Environmental Protection Agency)
Historic Preservation. The preservation of historically significant structures and neighborhoods until such time as, and in order to facilitate, restoration and rehabilitation of the building(s) to a former condition.
Historic Property. A historic property is a structure or site that has significant historic, architectural, or cultural value.
Household. All those persons—related or unrelated—who occupy a single housing unit. (See "Family.")
Housing and Community Development Department (HCD). The state agency that has principal responsibility for assessing, planning for, and assisting communities to meet the needs of Low -and Moderate -Income households.
Housing Element. One of the seven state -mandated elements of a local general plan. It assesses the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community, identifies potential sites adequate to provide the amount and kind of housing needed, and contains adopted goals, policies, and implementation programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing.
Housing Payment. For ownership housing, this is defined as the mortgage payment, property taxes, insurance and utilities. For rental housing this is defined as rent and utilities.
Housing Unit. The place of permanent or customary abode of a person or family. A housing unit may be a single-family dwelling, a multi -family dwelling, a condominium, a modular home, a mobile home, a cooperative, or any other residential unit considered real property under state law.
Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of (HUD). A cabinet -level department of the Federal government that administers housing and community development programs.
Implementing Policies. The City's statements of its commitments to consistent actions.
Implementation. Actions, procedures, programs, or techniques that carry out policies.
Infill Development. The development of new housing or other buildings on scattered vacant lots in a built-up area or on new building parcels created by permitted lot splits.
Jobs -Housing Balance. The existing or projected ratio of employment to housing units within a geographic area.
Land Use Classification. A system for classifying and designating the allowable use of properties.
E-3 March 2022.October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix E: Glossary
Revised Draft
Live -Work Units. Buildings or spaces within buildings that are used jointly for commercial and residential purposes where the residential use of the space is secondary or accessory to the primary use as a place of work.
Low -Income Household. A household with an annual income usually no greater than 51%-80% of the area median income adjusted by household size, as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)or the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
Low -Income Housing Tax Credits. Tax reductions provided by the Federal and state governments for investors in low-income housing.
Manufactured Housing. Residential structures that are constructed entirely in the factory, and which since June 15, 1976, have been regulated by the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 under the administration of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (See "Mobile Home" and "Modular Unit.")
Mixed-use. Properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with significant functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design. A "single site" may include contiguous properties.
Moderate -Income Household. A household with an annual income usually no greater than 81%-120% of the area median income adjusted by household size, as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
Monthly Housing Expense. Total principal, interest, taxes, and insurance paid by the borrower, or total rent and utilities paid by a tenant on a monthly basis. Used with gross income to determine affordability.
Multiple Family Building. A building designed and used exclusively as a dwelling by two or more households occupying separate suites.
Ordinance. A law or regulation set forth and adopted by a governmental authority, usually a city or county.
Overcrowded Housing Unit. A housing unit in which the members of the household or group are prevented from the enjoyment of privacy because of small room size and housing size. The U.S. Bureau of Census defines an overcrowded housing unit as one that is occupied by more than one person per room.
Parcel. A lot or tract of land.
Persons with Disabilities. Persons determined to have a physical impairment or mental disorder expected to be of long or indefinite duration. Many such impairments or disorders are of such a nature that a person's ability to live independently can be improved by appropriate housing conditions.
E-4 March 20220ctober 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix E: Glossary
Revised Draft
Planning Area. The area directly addressed by the general plan. A city's planning area typically encompasses the city limits and potentially annexable land within its sphere of influence.
Policy. A specific statement of principle or of guiding actions that implies clear commitment but is not mandatory. A general direction that a governmental agency sets to follow, in order to meet its objectives before undertaking an action program.
Poverty Level. As used by the U.S. Census, families and unrelated individuals are classified as being above or below the poverty level based on a poverty index that provides a range of income cutoffs or "poverty thresholds" varying by size of family, number of children, and age of householder. The income cutoffs are updated each year to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index.
Program. An action, activity, or strategy carried out in response to adopted policy to achieve a specific goal or objective. Policies and programs establish the "who," "how" and "when" for carrying out the "what" and "where" of goals and objectives.
Redevelop. To demolish existing buildings; or to increase the overall floor area existing on a property; or both; irrespective of whether a change occurs in land use.
Regional. Pertaining to activities or economies at a scale greater than that of a single jurisdiction, and affecting a broad geographic area.
Regional Housing Needs Assessment. A quantification of existing and projected housing need, by household income group, for localities within a region.
Rehabilitation. The repair, preservation, and/or improvement of substandard housing.
Residential. Land designated in the General Plan and zoning ordinance for building consisting of dwelling units. May be improved, vacant, or unimproved. (See "Dwelling Unit.")
Residential Care Facility. A facility that provides 24-hour care and supervision to its residents.
Residential, Multiple Family. Two or more dwelling units on a single site, under common ownership.
Residential, Single -Family. A single dwelling unit on a building site.
Retrofit. To add materials and/or devices to an existing building or system to improve its operation, safety, or efficiency. Buildings have been retrofitted to use solar energy and to strengthen their ability to withstand earthquakes, for example.
Rezoning. An amendment to the map to effect a change in the nature, density, or intensity of uses allowed in a zoning district and/or on a designated parcel or land area.
Second Unit. A self-contained living unit, either attached to or detached from, and in addition to, the primary residential unit on a single lot. "Granny Flat" is one type of second unit.
E-5 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix E: Glossary
Revised Draft
Section 8 Rental Assistance Program. A Federal (HUD) rent -subsidy program that is one of the main sources of Federal housing assistance for low-income households. The program operates by providing housing assistance payments to owners, developers, and public housing agencies to make up the difference between the "Fair Market Rent" of a unit (set by HUD) and the household's contribution toward the rent, which is calculated at 30% of the household's adjusted gross monthly income (GMI).
Shared Living. The occupancy of a dwelling unit by persons of more than one family in order to reduce housing expenses and provide social contact, mutual support, and assistance. Shared living facilities serving six or fewer persons are permitted in all residential districts by §1566.3 of the California Health and Safety Code.
Single-family Dwelling, Attached. A dwelling unit occupied or intended for occupancy by only one household that is structurally connected with at least one other such dwelling unit. (See "Townhouse.")
Single-family Dwelling, Detached. A dwelling unit occupied or intended for occupancy by only one household that is structurally independent from any other such dwelling unit or structure intended for residential or other use. (See "Family.") Single Room Occupancy (SRO). A single room, typically 80 to 250 square feet, with a sink and closet, but which may require the occupant to share a communal bathroom, shower, and kitchen.
Subsidize. To assist by payment of a sum of money or by the granting to terms or favors that reduces the need for monetary expenditures. Housing subsidies may take the form of mortgage interest deductions or tax credits from Federal and/or state income taxes, sale or lease at less than market value of land to be used for the construction of housing, payments to supplement a minimum affordable rent, and the like.
Substandard Housing. Residential dwellings that, because of their physical condition, do not provide safe and sanitary housing.
Supportive Housing. Housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population as defined in California Health and Safety Code §3260(d), and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. "Target population" means adults with low incomes having one or more disabilities, including mental illness, HIV or AIDS, substance abuse, or other chronic health conditions, or individuals eligible for services provided under the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act and may, among other populations, include families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals exiting from institutional settings, veterans, or homeless people. [California Health and Safety Code §50675.14(b) and §53260(d)]
Target Areas. Specifically designated sections of the community where loans and grants are made to bring about a specific outcome, such as the rehabilitation of housing affordable by very -low- and low-income households.
E-6 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix E: Glossary
Revised Draft
Tenure. A housing unit is "owned" if the owner or co-owner lives in the unit, even if it is mortgaged or not fully paid for. All other occupied units are classified as "rented," including units rented for cash rent and those occupied without payment of cash rent.
Townhouse. A townhouse is a dwelling unit located in a group of three (3) or more attached dwelling units with no dwelling unit located above or below another and with each dwelling unit having its own exterior entrance.
Transitional Housing. Shelter provide to the homeless for an extend period, often as long as 18 months, and generally integrated with other social services and counseling programs to assist in the transition to self-sufficiency through the acquisition of a stable income and permanent housing. (See "Emergency Shelter") Buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that call for the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months. [California Health and Safety Code §50675.2(h)] Very -Low -Income Household. A household with an annual income usually no greater than 50% of the area median income adjusted by household size, as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)or the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
E-7 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
Appendix E: Glossary
This page intentionally left blank.
Revised Draft E-8 March 2022October 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSfNESS. CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.00v
December 20, 2021
Joe Lambert, Director
Development Services Department
City of Placentia
401 East Chapman Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
Dear Joe Lambert:
RE: City of Placentia's 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Draft Housing Element GAVIN NEWSOM. Governor
Thank you for submitting the City of Placentia's (City) draft housing element received for review on October 21, 2021. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (b), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review. In addition, HCD considered comments from the Campaign for Fair Housing Elements; Kennedy Commission; and People for Housing Orange County, pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (c).
The draft element addresses many statutory requirements; however, revisions will be necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Gov. Code).
The enclosed Appendix describes the revisions needed to comply with State Housing Element Law.
As a reminder, the City's 6th cycle housing element was due October 15, 2021. As of today, the City has not completed the housing element process for the 6th cycle. The City's 5th cycle housing element no longer satisfies statutory requirements. HCD encourages the City to revise the element as described above, adopt, and submit to HCD to regain housing element compliance.
For your information, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1398 (Chapter 358, Statutes of 2021), if a local government fails to adopt a compliant housing element within 120 days of the statutory deadline (October 15, 2021), then any rezoning to accommodate the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA), including for lower-income households, shall be completed no later than one year from the statutory deadline. Otherwise, the local government's housing element will no longer comply with State Housing Element Law, and HCD may revoke its finding of substantial compliance pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (i).
ATTACHMENT 3
Joe Lambert, Director
Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant; the Strategic Growth Council and HCD's Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities programs; and HCD's Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City will meet housing element requirements for these and other funding sources.
For your information, some general plan element updates are triggered by housing element adoption. HCD reminds the City to consider timing provisions and welcomes the opportunity to provide assistance. For information, please see the Technical Advisories issued by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research at:
httr://oor.ca.00v/docs/OPR Aonendix C final.odf and
http://opr . ca. a ov/docs/F i na 16.26.15. odf.
HCD appreciates your efforts in the preparation of your draft element. We are committed to assisting the City in addressing all statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Chelsea Lee, of our staff, at Chelsea.LeeCZ hcd.ca.aov.
Sincerely,
Paul McDougall
Senior Program Manager
Enclosure
ATTACHMENT 3
APPENDIX
CITY OF PLACENTIA
The following changes are necessary to bring the City's housing element into compliance with Article 10.6 of the Government Code. Accompanying each recommended change, we cite the supporting section of the Government Code.
Housing element technical assistance information is available on HCD's website at htto: //www. hcd . ca. aov/community-developm ent/hou si na-element/ho using-element- memos.shtml. Among other resources, the housing element section contains HCD's latest technical assistance tool, Building Blocks for Effective Housing Elements (Building Blocks), available at http://www hcd.ca.aov/community-development/buildina-blocks/index.shtml and includes the Government Code addressing State Housing Element Law and other resources.
A. Review and Revision
Review the previous element to evaluate the appropriateness, effectiveness, and progress in implementation, and reflect the results of this review in the revised element. (Gov. Code, § 65588 (a) and (b).)
As part of the evaluation of programs in the past cycle, the element must provide an explanation of the effectiveness of goals, policies, and related actions in meeting the housing needs of special needs populations (e.g., elderly, persons with disabilities, large households, female headed households, farmworkers and persons experiencing homelessness).
B. Housing Needs. Resources. and Constraints
1. Affirmatively furthering] fair housing in accordance with Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8899.50) of Division 1 of Title 2...shall include an assessment of fair housing in the jurisdiction. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(10)(A).) The element provides a general overview of affirmatively furthering fair housing (AFFH), beginning on page 2-22, including general information on outreach and segregation and integration. However, it generally does not address this requirement. The element, among other things, must include outreach, an assessment of fair housing, analysis of the sites inventory, identification, and prioritization of contributing factors to fair housing issues and goals and actions sufficient to overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity. For further guidance, please visit HCD's AFFH in California webpage at https://www.hcd.ca.uov/community-develooment/affh/index.shtml .
2. Include an analysis of population and employment trends and documentation of projections and a quantification of the locality's existing and projected needs for all City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 1 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
income levels, including extremely low-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(1).)
Extremely Low -Income (ELI) Households: While the element quantifies existing and projected ELI households, it must also analyze their housing needs. For example, the element should analyze tenure, cost burden and other household characteristics then examine the availability of resources to determine gaps in housing needs. To assist the analysis, see the enclosed data and sample analysis at
htta:ll www.hcd.ca.aovlcommunity-development/buildina-blockslhousina-_ needslextremely-low-income-housina-needs.shtml.
3. Include an analysis and documentation of household characteristics, including level of payment compared to ability to pay, housing characteristics, including overcrowding, and housing stock condition. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(2).) Overpayment: While the element includes some general information on overpayment, it must also quantify and analyze the total number of households overpaying by tenure, including lower-income households. For additional information and sample analysis, see the Building Blocks at http:i/ www.hcd.ca.aov/community-developmentlhousina- elementlhousina-element-memos. s htm l .
Housina Stock Condition: The element estimates over 200 units need rehabilitation (p. 2-8). However, the element should clarify the data sources utilized in arriving at the City's estimation. For example, the analysis could include estimates from a recent windshield survey or sampling, estimates from the code enforcement agency, or information from knowledgeable organizations. In addition, the element should include an estimate of the number of units in need of replacement. For additional information, see the Building Blocks at http://www.hcd.ca.aov/community- developmentibuildina-blockslhousina-needs/housina-stock-characteristics. shtml.
Housina Costs: While the element identifies housing price trends and median home sales prices on page 2-10, it must also identify median rental prices to reflect current market conditions.
4. An inventory of land suitable and available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having realistic and demonstrated potential for redevelopment during the planning period to meet the locality's housing need for a designated income level, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(3).)
Reaional Housina Need Allocation (RHNA): The element's identified RHNA, dated March 4, 2021 and prior to HCD approval, is incorrect (p. 2-21). This RHNA does not reflect changes made to the City's RHNA and approved on July 1, 2021. For additional information, see httos://scaa.ca.aovlsitesimain/files/file-attachmentsl6th-cycle-rhna- final-allocation-plan. pdf?1625161899.
City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 2 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
Sites Inventory: The sites inventory lists the existing uses for nonvacant sites. However, these descriptions are generic (e.g., residential, industrial) and should be sufficiently detailed to facilitate an analysis that the use will likely discontinue in the planning period.
Realistic Capacity: While the element provides assumptions of buildout for sites included in the inventory, it must also provide support for these assumptions. For example, the element should demonstrate what specific trends, factors, and other evidence led to the assumptions. The estimate of the number of units for each site must be adjusted as necessary, based on the land use controls and site improvements, typical densities of existing or approved residential developments at a similar affordability level in that jurisdiction, and on the current or planned availability and accessibility of sufficient water, sewer, and dry utilities. In addition, the estimate must also account for land use controls such as allowing 100 percent nonresidential uses. To demonstrate the likelihood for residential development in nonresidential zones, the element could describe any performance standards mandating a specified portion of residential and any factors increasing the potential for residential development such as incentives for residential use, and residential development trends in the same nonresidential zoning districts.
Suitability of Nonvacant Sites: While the element identifies nonvacant sites to accommodate the regional housing need for lower-income households, it provides no methodology or description of their potential for redevelopment. The element must describe the methodology used to determine the additional development potential within the planning period. The methodology must consider factors including the extent to which existing uses may impede additional residential development, development trends, market conditions, any existing leases or other contracts that would perpetuate the existing use or prevent redevelopment of the site for additional residential development, and regulatory or other incentives or standards to encourage additional residential development on these sites. (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (g).) In addition, the housing element appears to rely upon nonvacant sites to accommodate more than 50 percent of the RHNA for lower-income households. For your information, the housing element must demonstrate existing uses are not an impediment to additional residential development and will likely discontinue in the planning period. (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (g)(2).) Absent findings (e.g., adoption resolution) based on substantial evidence, the existing uses will be presumed to impede additional residential development and will not be utilized toward demonstrating adequate sites to accommodate the regional housing need allocation.
Finally, if element utilizes sites with existing residential uses. Absent a replacement housing policy, these sites are not adequate sites to accommodate lower-income households. The replacement housing policy has the same requirements as set forth in Government Code section 65915, subdivision (c) (3).
Sites Identified in Prior Planning Periods: Sites identified in prior planning periods shall not be deemed adequate to accommodate the housing needs for lower-income households unless a program, meeting statutory requirements, requires rezoning within City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 3 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
three years. The element should clarify if sites were identified in prior planning periods and if so, which sites and include a program if utilizing previously identified sites in the current planning period. For more information on program requirements, please see HCD's Housing Element Sites Inventory Guidebook at
https://www . hcd.ca.aov/community-development/housing-element/housina-element- memos.shtml.
Availability of Infrastructure: The element describes the availability of water capacity but must also demonstrate sufficient existing or planned total sewer and dry utilities capacity to accommodate the RHNA.
For your information, water and sewer service providers must establish specific procedures to grant priority water and sewer service to developments with units affordable to lower-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65589.7.) Local governments are required to immediately deliver the housing element to water and sewer service providers. HCD recommends including a cover memo describing the City housing element, including RHNA, see the Building Blocks at http://www.hcd.ca.aov/community- developmentlbuildina-blocks/other-reouirements/priority-for-water-sewer.shtml.
Environmental Constraints While the element generally describes a few environmental conditions within the City (pp. 3-17 to 3-20), it must also describe any known environmental constraints or other conditions on identified sites that could impact housing development in the planning period. In addition, the element notes consolidation or other factors may impact development on sites identified to accommodate housing for moderate and above moderate -income households and as a result, it should include analysis, adjustments and policies and programs to demonstrate the feasibility of these sites in the planning period.
Affirmatively Furtherina Fair Housina: The element must demonstrate the sites inventory AFFH. For more information, see HCD's guidance at
httvs://www. hcd.ca. aov/community-development/housing-element/housina-element- memos.shtml.
Sites Map: The element does not address this requirement. The element must include a general map of identified sites. For additional information, see the sites inventory analysis section of the Building Blocks at http://www.hcd.ca.aov/community- development/buildina-blocks/site-inventory-analysis/inventory-of-land-suitable.shtml.
Electronic Sites Inventory: For your information, pursuant to Government Code section 65583.3, the City must submit an electronic sites inventory with its adopted housing element. The City must utilize standards, forms, and definitions adopted by HCD.
Please see HCD's housing element webpage at https://www.hcd.ca.aov/community- development/housing-element/index.shtml#element for a copy of the form and instructions. The City can reach out to HCD at sitesinventorv�7a.hcd.ca.aov for technical assistance.
City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 4 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
Accessory Dwellina Units (ADU): The element projects 56 ADUs over the planning period or approximately seven ADUs per year over the eight-year planning period.
According to HCD records, 2 units were permitted in 2018, two were permitted in 2019, and five permitted in 2020. These trends do not support an assumption of seven ADUs per year. To support assumptions for ADUs in the planning period, the element should reconcile trends with HCD records, adjust assumptions as appropriate and include additional information such as more recent permitted units and inquiries, resources and incentives, other relevant factors and modify policies and programs as appropriate.
Zoninai for a Variety of Housing Types: The element must demonstrate zoning to encourage and facilitate a variety of housing types, as follows:
• Emergency Shelters: The element must demonstrate the M (Manufacturing) zone still has sufficient capacity to accommodate the identified housing need for emergency shelters. For example, the element should identify acreage, typical parcels sizes, whether the sites are nonvacant, and the potential capacity for adaptive reuse. In addition, Municipal Code Section 23.47.130, subdivision (5) appears to constrain the development of emergency shelters by imposing spacing requirements of at least 300 feet from any residential use or residentially zoned property, public or private park, or school. The element should analyze spacing requirements for as potential constraints on emergency shelter and add a program as necessary. For additional information and a sample analysis, see the Building Blocks at htto:/I www.hcd.ca.aov/community-develooment/housina- elementlhousina-element-memosldocslsb2 memo050708.odf.
• Employee Housing: The Employee Housing Act (Health and Safety Code, § 17000 et seq.), specifically, sections 17021.5 and 17021.6. Section 17021.5 requires employee housing for six or fewer employees to be treated as a single- family structure and permitted in the same manner as other dwellings of the same type in the same zone. Section 17021.6 requires employee housing consisting of no more than 12 units or 36 beds to be permitted in the same manner as other agricultural uses in the same zone. The element should demonstrate consistency with these requirements and include programs if necessary.
• Manufactured Housing: The element did not address this requirement. The element must demonstrate zoning permits manufactured housing in compliance with Government Code section 65852.3, similar to single family uses. • Permanent Supportive Housing: Supportive housing shall be a use by -right in zones where multifamily and mixed uses are permitted, including nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses pursuant to Government Code section 65651.
The element must demonstrate compliance with this requirement and include programs as appropriate.
• Accessory Dwelling Units: This housing type appears to be excluded from several residential zones, inconsistent with state law. The element should evaluate compliance with state ADU law and include programs as appropriate.
5. An analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 5 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including the types of housing identified in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c), and for persons with disabilities as identified in the analysis pursuant to paragraph (7), including land use controls, building codes and their enforcement, site improvements, fees and other exactions required of developers, and local processing and permit procedures... (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(5).)
Land Use Controls: The element must also analyze all relevant land use controls impacts as potential constraints on a variety of housing types (e.g., multifamily rental housing, mobilehomes, transitional housing). The analysis must also evaluate the cumulative impacts of land use controls on the cost and supply of housing, including the ability to achieve maximum densities and cost and supply of housing. Specifically, the analysis should address multifamily height and parking requirements, including requirements for garages and impacts on one -bedroom and studio units. In addition, the analysis should identify and analyze the standards for the Old Town (OT) and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) zones, including all subdistricts. The element should include programs to address and remove or mitigate identified constraints.
Development Plan Review (DPR): The element notes multifamily uses are subject to a DPR by the Planning Commission but should also analyze this process. The analysis should address typical number of hearings, approval findings and timing and evaluate impacts on housing cost, timing, supply and approval certainty.
Fees and Exactions: While the element includes a summary of total fees for typical single family and multifamily, it should also list and analyze planning fees (e.g., DPR, rezone, general plan amendment, variance, conditional use permit).
Housina for Persons with Disabilities: The element states the City has a reasonable accommodation procedure (p. 3-11), but it should also analyze the procedure for potential constraints. The analysis should address the process, application requirements and approval findings. In addition, the element indicates group homes for six or fewer persons are permitted in residential zones but should also address whether group homes for seven or more persons are permitted, how and where they permitted and include programs as appropriate. For additional information and a sample program and ordinance, see the Building Blocks at
htto:// www.hcd.ca.aov/hpd/housina element2fPRO mitiaate.oho.
Codes and Enforcement: Although the element mentions it follows the California Building Code, it also indicates it processes local amendments to "further define requirements based on the unique local conditions" (p. 3-15). The element must describe the City's building and zoning code enforcement processes and procedures and identify and analyze any local amendments to the building code for impact as potential constraints on housing cost and supply. For additional information and a sample analysis, see the Building Blocks at http://www.hcd.ca.aovlcommunity development/building-blocks/constraints/codes-and-enforcement-on-offsite- improvement-standards.shtml.
City of Placentia's 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 6 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
Local Ordinances: The element must specifically analyze locally adopted ordinances such as inclusionary ordinances or short-term rental ordinances that directly impact the cost and supply of residential development. The analysis should demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from meeting its share of the regional housing need and from meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities, supportive housing, transitional housing, and emergency shelters.
SB 35 Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process: The element must identify and analyze whether the City has written procedures to implement the SB 35 Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process and include a program if necessary.
Zoning, Development Standards and Fees: The element must clarify its compliance with new transparency requirements for posting all zoning, development standards and fees for each parcel on the jurisdictions' website and add a program to address these requirements if necessary.
6. An analysis of potential and actual nongovernmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including the availability of financing, the price of land, the cost of construction, the requests to develop housing at densities below those anticipated in the analysis required by subdivision (c) of Government Code section 65583.2, and the length of time between receiving approval for a housing development and submittal of an application for building permits for that housing development that hinder the construction of a locality's share of the regional housing need in accordance with Government Code section 65584. The analysis shall also demonstrate local efforts to remove nongovernmental constraints that create a gap between the locality's planning for the development of housing for all income levels and the construction of that housing. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(6).) Identified Densities and Approval Times: The element did not address these requirements. The element must address requests to develop housing at densities below those anticipated in the sites inventory and the length of time between receiving approval for housing development and submittal of application for building permits. The analysis must address any hinderances on housing development and programs should be added as appropriate.
7. Analyze any special housing needs such as elderly; persons with disabilities, including a developmental disability; large families; farmworkers; families with female heads of households; and families and persons in need of emergency shelter. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(7).)
While the element quantifies several of the City's special needs populations, it must analyze the special housing needs of each of these groups. For a complete analysis of each population group, the element should discuss challenges faced by the population, the existing resources to meet those needs (availability of senior housing units, percent of large units, percent of deed restricted units, etc.,), an assessment of any gaps in resources and proposed policies, programs, and funding to help address those gaps.
City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 7 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
In addition, the element indicates there are approximately 136 total jobs and 80 full-time year-round jobs in the agricultural industry within the City (p. 2-18); however, the analysis does not consider the regional context. Farmworkers from the broader area and those employed seasonally may have housing needs that are not currently reflected in the analysis. As a result, the element should at least acknowledge the housing needs of farmworkers at a county level (e.g. USDA county -level farmworker data) and include programs as appropriate.
C. Housing Programs
1. Include a program which sets forth a schedule of actions during the planning period, each with a timeline for implementation, which may recognize that certain programs are ongoing, such that there will be beneficial impacts of the programs within the planning period, that the local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element through the administration of land use and development controls, the provision of regulatory concessions and incentives, and the utilization of appropriate federal and state financing and subsidy programs when available. The program shall include an identification of the agencies and officials responsible for the implementation of the various actions. (Gov.
Code, § 65583, subd. (c).)
To address the program requirements of Government Code section 65583, subdivisions (c) (1-6), and to facilitate implementation, several programs should be revised to include more discrete timing, rather than "ongoing" or in "process." Examples include actions under Programs 1.8 (Adequate Sites for Housing Development), 1.14 (Housing for Persons with Special Needs), 1.15 (Transit -Oriented Development), 3.1 (Community Based Neighborhood Rehabilitation), 3.3 (Placentia Rehabilitation Grant Program), 4.1 (Partnerships with the Housing Industry), and 4.2 (Participation in Continuum of Care Forum). In addition, many programs do not contain specific and clear commitments to complete a deliverable or action that will have a tangible and beneficial impact in the planning period and, as a result, should be revised. For example, actions under Programs 1.1 (Manufactured Housing and Mobile Homes), 1.2 (Locate Housing Near Transportation, Employment and Services), 1.3 (Pursue County, State, and Federal Housing Funds), and 1.15 (Transit -Oriented Development) commit to "preserve," "encourage," and "increase," which does not result in any tangible outcomes.
2. Identify actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period with appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that portion of the city's or county's share of the regional housing need for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory completed pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) without rezoning, and to comply with the requirements of Government Code section 65584.09. Sites shall be identified as needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multifamily rental housing, factory -built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single -room occupancy units, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(1).)
City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 8 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
As noted in Finding B4, the element does not include a complete site analysis, therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types.
Shortfall of Sites: The element describes a shortfall of sites, particularly for the moderate and above moderate income RHNA, and indicates rezoning will occur to accommodate the RHNA. While the element includes Program 1.8 (Adequate Sites for Housing Development), it must specifically commit to acreage, allowable densities, and anticipated units. In addition, if necessary, to accommodate the housing needs of lower- income households, the program should specifically commit to rezoning pursuant to Government Code section 65583.2, subdivisions (h) and (i).
Sites Identified in Multiple Planning Periods: If identifying sites utilized in prior planning periods, the element must include a program for vacant sites identified in two of more consecutive planning periods' housing elements or nonvacant sites identified in a prior housing element, that are currently identified to accommodate housing for lower-income households. The program must be implemented within the first three years of the planning period and commit to zoning that will meet the density requirements for housing for lower-income households and allow by -right approval for housing developments that include 20 percent or more of its units affordable to lower-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (c).)
Replacement Provisions: The element should include a policy replacing units on sites with existing residential uses pursuant to Government Code section 65583.2, subdivision (g).
Program 1.5 (Infrastructure Provision): Because the element indicates that the City's future housing needs would place greater demands on its sewage infrastructure (pg. 3- 20), the program could identify additional funding sources, such as CDBG, IBank, and USDA funds, to address infrastructure constraints and prioritize identified areas with infrastructure constraints for improvement. For a list of funding opportunities, see HCD's Financial Assistance Program Directory at htto://hcd.ca.govlfa/LG program directorv.odf. Other resources include the California Financing Coordinating Committee (CFCC).
3. The housing element shall contain programs which assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate - income households. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(2).)
While the element incudes Programs 1.3 (Pursue Funding), 1.8 (Adequate Sites) and
1.14 (Housing for Persons with Special Needs), these programs should be revised with specific and proactive outreach efforts with developers of affordable housing on an annual basis.
City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 9 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
4. Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, including housing for all income levels and housing for persons with disabilities. The program shall remove constraints to, and provide reasonable accommodations for housing designed for, intended for occupancy by, or with supportive services for, persons with disabilities. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(3).) As noted in Findings B5 and B6, the element requires a complete analysis of potential governmental and nongovernmental constraints. Depending upon the results of that analysis, the City may need to revise or add programs and address and remove or mitigate any identified constraints.
5. Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing throughout the community or communities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability, and other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Part 2.8 (commencing with Section 12900) of Division 3 of Title 2), Section 65008, and any other state and federal fair housing and planning law. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(5).) As noted in Finding B1, the element must include a complete analysis of AFFH . Based on the outcome of that analysis, the element must add or modify programs. For more information, please see HCD's guidance at httos:li www.hcd.ca.aov/community- develoimentiaffh/index. shtm.
6. The housing program shall preserve for low-income household the assisted housing developments identified pursuant to paragraph (9) of subdivision (a). The program for preservation of the assisted housing developments shall utilize, to the extent necessary, all available federal, state, and local financing and subsidy programs identified in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a), except where a community has other urgent needs for which alternative funding sources are not available. The program may include strategies that involve local regulation and technical assistance. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(6).)
The element identifies the Imperial Villas project, with 58 units at -risk, of converting to market -rate uses in the planning period. Program 3.5 (Monitoring At -Risk Units) should be revised to comply with noticing requirements, provide education and assistance to tenants, assist with funding, and promptly reach out to qualified entities to preserve at - risk housing units.
7. Develop a plan that incentivizes and promotes the creation of accessory dwelling units that can be offered at affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code, for very low, low-, or moderate -income households. For purposes of this paragraph, "accessory dwelling units" has the same meaning as "accessory dwelling unit" as defined in paragraph (4) of subdivision (1) of Section 65852.2. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(7).)
City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 10 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
As indicated in Finding B4, the element may need to include a program to amend the City's ADU ordinance. In addition, programs must be expanded to include incentives to promote the creation and affordability of ADUs. Examples include exploring and pursuing funding, modifying development standards and reducing fees beyond state law, increasing awareness, pre -approved plans and homeowner/applicant assistance tools. Finally, given the City's assumptions for ADUs exceed recent trends, the element should include a program to monitor permitted ADUs and affordability every other year and take appropriate action such as adjusting assumptions or rezoning within a specified time period (e.g., 6 months).
D. Public Participation
Local governments shall make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of the Housing Element, and the element shall describe this effort. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(8).) Although the element includes a general summary of the public participation process (p. 1- 4 and in Appendix A), HCD has received public comments from groups concerned that the City has not demonstrated diligent efforts were made to involve all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element. The element should address public comments received, could describe the efforts to circulate the housing element among low- and moderate -income households and organizations that represent them and involve such groups and persons in the element throughout the process. In addition, the element should also summarize the public comments and describe how they were considered and incorporated into the element. For additional information, see the Building Blocks at htto://www. hcd.ca.Qov/community-develooment/buildina-blocks/oettina- sta rted/p u blic-pa rti ci oation. shtm l .
In addition, it is unclear when the City made the element available to the public prior to submitting to HCD. The availability of the document to the public and opportunity for public comment prior to submittal to HCD is essential to the public process and HCD's review.
The City must proactively make future revisions available to the public, including any commenters, prior to submitting any revisions to HCD and diligently consider and address comments, including revising the document where appropriate. HCD's future review will consider the extent to which the revised element documents how the City solicited, considered, and addressed public comments in the element. The City's consideration of public comments must not be limited by HCD's findings in this review letter.
City of Placentia's 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 11 December 20, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
HCD Comment
(Letter of 12/20/2021)
A. Review and revision
B.1 Affirmatively furthering fair
housing
B.2 Extremely -low-income
households
B.3 Household characteristics
B.4 Sites inventory
Attachment 4
HCD Comments and Responses
City of Placentia
Revised Draft
Housing Element
Page No.
Appendix C
Appendix D
4-1 1
2-5/6
2-5/6
2-9
2-1 1
2-21
Appendix B
Appendix B
Response/Revision
Appendix C has been revised to provide additional explanation of the effectiveness of goals, policies, and related actions in meeting the housing needs of special needs populations.
The element has been revised to include additional analysis of fair housing. In addition, Program 2.1 has been revised to describe additional actions the City will take to affirmatively further fair housing.
The element has been revised to provide additional analysis of ELI households, including cost burden and severe cost burden by tenure.
Overtoavment. The analysis contained in the draft element (Table II -7) included overpayment for lower-income households by income category.
This analysis has been expanded to also quantify overpaying households by tenure (i.e., renter and owner).
Housing stock conditions. The element has been revised to include data sources and an estimate of the number of housing units in need of replacement.
Median rent. The element has been revised to include the estimated average rent in the city.
RHNA: Table 2-3 has been revised to reflect RHNA modifications approved by SCAG on 7/1/2021.
Sites inventory. The inventory has been revised to include additional information regarding existing uses.
Realistic Capacity. Additional analysis of the realistic capacity of the sites inventory has been provided.
March 2022 -1
ATTACHMENT 4
HCD Comment
(Letter of 12/20/2021)
B.4 Zoning for a Variety of Housing
Types
Revised Draft
Housing Element
Page No.
Appendix B
4-4
Appendix13
4-4
3-20
3-17 to 20
Appendix D
Appendix B
Response/Revision
Suitability of nonvacant sites. Additional analysis has been provided regarding the potential capacity for additional housing on nonvacant sites.
In addition, Program 1.8 has been revised to include a replacement requirement pursuant to Gov. Code §65583.2(g)(3) if this property is rezoned to accommodate a RHNA shortfall and any existing residential units in this project would be demolished.
Sites identified in a prior olannina period. The sites inventory has been expanded to identify sites used in a prior planning period. In addition, Program 1.8 has been revised in conformance with State law.
Infrastructure: The original draft element included analysis of sewer and dry utilities.
Environmental Constraints: The original draft element included analysis of environmental constraints, including seismic, flooding, hazardous waste, transportation of hazardous materials, fire hazards and noise. The analysis has been expanded to clarify that these potential constraints are not expected to preclude development commensurate with the City's assigned share of regional housing needs.
AFFH. Analysis of how the sites inventory addresses fair housing goals has been provided in Appendix D.
Sites map. Maps showing the locations of parcels in the sites inventory have been added in Appendix B.
Electronic sites inventory. An electronic sites inventory is being submitted with the adopted element as required by State law.
B-3 ADUs. The analysis of ADU production has been expanded to address this comment.
3-32 Emeraencv Shelters: The element has been revised to provide additional analysis of the City's available sites and development standards for emergency shelters. In addition, Program 1.4 has been revised to include an amendment to emergency shelter parking requirements consistent with AB 139 (Government Code sec 65583(a)(4)(A)).
March 2022 -2-
ATTACHMENT 4
HCD Comment
(Letter of 12/20/2021)
B.5 Governmental constraints
Revised Draft
Housing Element
Page No.
3-15
4-4
3-15
Response/Revision
Employee housina: The element has been revised to demonstrate consistency with the Employee Housing Act (Health and Safety Code, §17000 et seq.) and Program 1.4 has been revised to include a Code amendment consistent with current law.
Manufactured housing: The element has been revised to demonstrate consistency with Government Code section 65852.3.
3-14 Permanent supportive housina. The element has been revised to 4-3 demonstrate consistency with Government Code section 65651. 3-6
3-34
4-10
3-7 to 24
4-10
3-36 to 39
3-36
3-27 to 29
ADUs. The element has been revised to reflect current City ADU regulations and Program 1.19 has been revised to include additional measures to encourage ADU production.
Land use controls. The element has been revised to include additional analysis of the cumulative impacts of land use controls on the cost and supply of housing, including the ability to achieve maximum densities. The analysis includes multifamily height and parking requirements, including requirements for garages and impacts on 1 -bedroom and studio units, as well as development standards for the Old Town (OT) and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) zones, including all subdistricts. In addition, Program 1.17 has been revised to include a Code amendment to reduce required parking for studio and 1 -bedroom units in the R-3 district to 1 space in either a garage or a carport.
Development Dian review: The element has been revised to provide additional analysis of the DPR process and approval procedures.
Fees. The element has been revised to include at development fees for typical residential projects. It should be recognized that some fees (e.g., General Plan amendment, specific plan, zone change) are not required unless an applicant Is seeking to change land use regulations. Therefore, they are not relevant to the analysis of typical fees.
Housing for persons with disabilities. The element has been revised to provide additional information regarding the reasonable accommodation process and the recent approval of a use permit for a large residential care facility.
March 2022 -3-
ATTACHMENT 4
HCD Comment
(Letter of 12/20/2021)
B.6 Non-governmental constraints
B.7 Special housing needs
0.1 Programs that set forth a
schedule of actions during the
planning period
C.2 Programs to make sites
available during the planning
period
Revised Draft
Housing Element
Page No.
3-35/36
3-35
4-4
4-4
3-45
2-12 to 19
Chapter 4
Chapter 4
Response/Revision
Codes and enforcement. The element has been revised to provide additional analysis of codes and enforcement, including local amendments to the Building Code and the enforcement process.
Other Local Ordinances: The element has been revised to analyze any locally adopted ordinances that directly impacts the cost and supply or residential development, including growth limits, inclusionary requirements and short- term rentals.
SB 35 Streamlined Ministerial Aooroval Process. Program 1.6 has been revised to include preparation of written procedures for the SB 35 Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process.
Zonina, Development Standards. and Fees. Program 1.6 has been revised to address new transparency laws requiring fees and zoning requirements to be provided on a jurisdiction's website.
Aooroval Time and Reauests Lesser Densities: The element has been revised to include additional analysis of requests to develop housing at densities below those identified, the length of time between receiving approval for a housing development and submittal of an application for building permits.
The housing needs assessment has been expanded to provide additional analysis of special housing needs.
Housing programs have been revised to include more specific timing and description of the City's role in implementation.
Shortfall of sites. Program 1.8 (Adequate Sites for Housing Development) has been revised to include specific commitments for rezoning including acreage, allowable densities, and anticipated units, as well as compliance with Government Code section 65583.2, subdivisions (h) and (i).
Sites identified in multiple plannina periods. Program 1.8 (Adequate Sites for Housing Development) has also been revised to include a requirement that for any non -vacant sites identified in Appendix B that were listed in a previous Housing Element sites inventory, or vacant sites that were listed in two previous consecutive inventories, residential development will be allowed by - right when a housing project provides at least 20% of the units affordable to March 2022 -4-
ATTACHMENT 4
HCD Comment
(Letter of 12/20/2021)
C.3 Programs to assist development
of housing for extremely -low-
income households
C.4 Programs to remove
governmental and
nongovernmental constraints to the
maintenance, improvement, and
development of housing
C.5 Affirmatively furthering fair
housing
Revised Draft
Housing Element
Page No.
Response/Revision
lower-income households in compliance with Government Code Sec. 65583.2(c).
Replacement Provisions. Program 1.8 (Adequate Sites for Housing Development) has also been revised to include a requirement that development on any site listed in Appendix B that proposes to demolish existing housing units shall be subject to a policy requiring the replacement of affordable units as a condition of any development on the site pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65583.2(g) (3). Replacement requirements shall be consistent with those set forth in Section 65915(c)(3).
Infrastructure. Program 1.5 has been revised to include annual review of infrastructure grant opportunities and application submittal based on eligibility.
Chapter 4 Programs 1.3 (Pursue Funding), 1.8 (Adequate Sites) and 1.14 (Housing for Persons with Special Needs) have been revised to include specific and proactive outreach efforts with developers of affordable housing on an annual basis.
This comment is addressed in B5 and B6 above.
Appendix D
4-11
C.6 Programs to preserve low-
income housing
C.7 ADUs
4-14
4-10
Additional analysis of AFFH issues is provided in Appendix D and Program 2.1 has been expanded to include additional actions the City will take to further fair housing.
Program 3.5 (Monitoring At -Risk Units) has been revised to include compliance with noticing requirements, provide education and assistance to tenants, assist with funding, and promptly reach out to qualified entities to preserve at -risk housing units.
Program 1.19 (Accessory Dwelling Units) has been revised to include additional incentives to promote the creation and affordability of ADUs.
March 2022 -5-
ATTACHMENT 4
HCD Comment
(Letter of 12/20/2021)
D. Public Participation
Revised Draft
Housing Element
Page No.
Appendix A
Response/Revision
The element has been revised to provide additional information regarding the public participation process.
March 2022 6 -
ATTACHMENT 4
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FISCAL
IMPACT:
SUMMARY:
Placentia Cit Council
CITY COUNCIL
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MARCH 15, 2022
AGENDA REPORT
CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS FOR ONGOING OUTDOOR DINING PERMITS
AND EXTENDING RELAXATION OF CITYWIDE OUTDOOR REGULATIONS
AND ON-SITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESTAURANTS AND OTHER
BUSINESSES AND CONSIDERING AN EXTENSION OF THE WEST SANTA FE
AVENUE STREET CLOSURE
NOMINAL EXPENDITURES RELATED TO STAFF REVIEW OF OUTDOOR
BUSINESS AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS AND WORKING WITH
PARTICIPATING BUSINESSES. UNKNOWN REVENUE RESULTING FROM
SALES TAX FROM RESTAURANTS SERVING MORE CUSTOMERS THAN
TYPICAL OCCUPANCY STANDARDS
On November 16, 2021, City Council adopted Proclamation No. P-2021-02, extending citywide outdoor dining regulations and relaxing on-site parking requirements until March 31, 2022, and extending the street closure of the 100-200 block of West Santa Fe Avenue until June 30, 2022.
At this time, the Old Town Placentia Outdoor Business program will remain active until June 30, 2022 unless directed otherwise. The Temporary Citywide Outdoor Dining and Business Program will be expiring on March 31, 2022 unless directed otherwise and Staff has recommendations for City Council regarding the future of that program. In the meantime, Staff recommends extending the citywide outdoor dining regulations through the end of 2022, and creating an administrative Use Permit process for future, permanent Citywide Outdoor Dining operations on a case by case basis.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Receive the Staff Presentation and consider the creation of an administrative Use Permit (UP) process for existing businesses to expand operations outside (i.e. outdoor dining) and provide direction to Staff; and
3. a.
Mar. 15, 2022
City Council Agenda
March 15, 2022
2. Provide direction to Staff regarding the potential extension of both the Citywide Outdoor Dining program (expiring March 31, 2022) and the Old Town Placentia Street Closure (expiring June 30, 2022); and
3. If City Council chooses to extend the Citywide Outdoor Dining program and/or the Old Town Placentia Street Closure, direct the City Administrator, acting as the Director of Emergency Services, to extend one or both programs that are currently effective and set forth by Proclamation No. P-2021-02.
BACKGROUND:
On May 19, 2020, the City Council adopted Proclamation P-2020-03, which authorized the creation of an administrative program in response to COVID-19 to temporarily relax outdoor dining regulations and relax on-site parking requirements, and to waive related fees. Subsequently on November 3, 2020, the City Council adopted Proclamation P-2020-06 which extended the regulations to allow businesses to operate outdoors and relax on-site parking requirements, and to waive related fees.
On June 1, 2021, City Council adopted Proclamation P-2021-01, which extended the regulations to allow businesses to operate outdoors and relax on-site parking requirements citywide (the Temporary Citywide Outdoor Dining Program) and waive related fees until December 30, 2021, and also extended the Old Town Placentia Outdoor Business program for businesses located in and immediately adjacent to the 100-200 block of West Santa Fe Avenue until June 30, 2022.
City Council action on June 1, 2021 included direction to Staff to come back with analysis for a City Council policy discussion related to the Temporary Citywide Outdoor Dining Program within four (4) to six (6) months; and, to come back with analysis for formal City Council recommendation within nine (9) to 12 months related to the Old Town Placentia Outdoor Business program and street closure.
On November 16, 2021, City Council adopted Proclamation No. P-2021-02, extending citywide outdoor dining regulations and relaxing on-site parking requirements until March 31, 2022, and extending the 100-200 block of West Santa Fe Avenue street closure until June 30, 2022.
DISCUSSION:
At this time, the Old Town Placentia Outdoor Business program will remain active until June 30, 2022 unless City Council directs Staff to extend that program. The Temporary Citywide Outdoor Dining and Business Program will be expiring on March 31, 2022 unless directed otherwise. The attached presentation includes options for City Council direction only regarding the future of the Citywide Outdoor Dining program and options for processing permits related to only Citywide Outdoor Dining.
If City Council directs Staff to create an administrative Use Permit (UP) process for existing businesses to expand operations outside (i.e. outdoor dining), Staff recommends extending the citywide outdoor dining regulations through the end of 2022, and creating an administrative Use Permit process for future, permanent citywide outdoor dining operations on a case by case basis.
City Council Agenda
March 15, 2022
Extending the Citywide outdoor dining regulations through the end of 2022 will allow Staff time to create permanent regulations as directed by Council. As previously stated, the street closure of the 100-200 block of West Santa Fe Avenue expires on June 30, 2022 and City Council may also direct staff to extend that closure as part of Staff's recommendation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Nominal expenditures related to Staff review of outdoor dining, outdoor Business and Encroachment Permits and working with participating businesses through the permitting and inspection process. There will also be offsetting, but unknown revenue gains from ability of businesses to serve a higher number of customers than otherwise possible during this pandemic.
If City Council selects an Administrative Use Permit option, the City's User Fee Schedule will be adjusted accordingly to offset Staff costs.
Prepared by:
sley 'i' hittaker
ssociate Planner
Reviewed and approved:
Damien R. Arrula
City Administrator
Reviewed and approved:
eph ambe
!rector of Development Services
Attachment:
PowerPoint related to Citywide Outdoor Dining
Outline
1. Background
2. Current Businesses Utilizing Temporary Outdoor Dining Procedures and Encroachment (TOBE)
3. Survey of Surrounding Cities
4. Options for Ongoing Outdoor Business Operations
ATTACHMENT 1
Background
• May 19, 2020, the Placentia City Council first approved Citywide Temporary Outdoor Business Encroachment Permits (TOBE) by proclamation, and that program was extended by Council
action in November 2020, June 2021, and the latest action in November 2021 extended TOBE's until March 31, 2022, and the Santa Fe street closure was extended until June 30, 2022 • This allowed approved businesses to increase the allowable space available for business activities such as outdoor dining • 40 Approved Applications (*6 of those located on Santa Fe Ave, which is part of the Old Town street closure)
• 15 (not including any on Santa Fe Ave)Businesses still using Temp. Outdoor Dining
Most consist of water barriers, temporary fencing, flagging, canopies
ATTACHMENT 1
Temporary Outdoor Dining
Permits Still Operating
(Citywide, not Old Town)
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
9. 10.
11. 12.
13. 14.
15. The Bruery
Mr. D's
El Farolito
Esther's Taco
Mini Gourmet
American Legion
The Pizza Store
Clubhouse Grille & Spirits
Craftsman Pizza
Paul's Country Kitchen
Imperial Market (Fiesta
Imperial)
Rembrandts
King's Teriyaki Grill
Kelly's Korner Tavern
Stereo Brewing
ATTACHMENT 1
Proposed
Surrounding Cities
City
Offering Temp.
Dining
Yorba Linda
Brea
Irvine
Tustin
Buena Park Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No change in near future
Grace period given
Looking for option to apply for permanent
outdoor expansion
Currently surveying businesses for needs
Will remain until a permanent an outdoor
dining ordinance is adopted
Costa Mesa Yes Dec 2022
Fullerton
Laguna Beach
Newport Beach
Orange
Extended 6 months Expires in March, will most likely be from Sept 2021 extended
Yes
Yes
Yes
End of 2023
TBD
TBD
ATTACHMENT 1
Options for Ongoing Outdoor Business Operations when
TOBE's Expire
Qption #1: Create Administrative Process (Admin UP or
Admin UP Mod)
• Could allow for a permanent structure to be proposed through building plan check, with an administrative UP or UP Mod.
• Decreased Fee (can be included in forthcoming User Fee Study) • Faster Process
• No Planning Commission Public Hearing required
• Includes ways to address parking (e.g. 5-10% reduction) • Largely dependent on design, quality materials and safety ATTACHMENT 1
Options for Ongoing Outdoor Business Operations
gption #2: Use Permit or UP Mod
• Currently the procedure for restaurants that request to expand outdoor seating - usually because there is an
alcohol license and ABC requirements, and alcohol sales are "conditionally permitted"
Use Permit Facts
UP Fee: $7,215 (plus Fire submittal raises
fee to about $7,900.)
UP MOD Fee: $5,596 (plus Fire submittal
raises fee to $5,958)
Timeline: Approx. 2-3 months
ATTACHMENT 1
Options for Ongoing Outdoor Business Operations
option #3: Do not consider ways to administratively address parking reductions and other Code deviations for Outdoor Dining
ATTACHMENT 1
Staff Recommendation for Citywide TOBE Program
Option #1: Direct Staff to extend TOBE program
(Proclamation No. P-2021-02) through end of 2022 or
longer, giving staff time to execute Council direction
regarding ongoing outdoor operations
Option #2: End all Temporary Citywide Outdoor Business
Permits effective March 31, 2022
Proclamation No. P-2021-02 currently extends the
Citywide Outdoor Business program through March 31,
2022, and the Santa Fe street closure through June 30, 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
Comments or Questions?
ATTACHMENT 1
Placentia City Council
AGENDA REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
VIA: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DATE: MARCH 15, 2022
SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING POLICY DISCUSSION FISCAL
IMPACT: NONE
SUMMARY:
At the April 20, 2021, City Council ("Council") meeting, Staff was directed to research the City's current recreational vehicle ("RV") regulations within single-family residential districts related to the storage of RVs on private property. Staff evaluated existing Placentia Municipal Code (PMC) Section 23.78.145 "Parking and Storage within Required Front Yard Setback", Section 23.78.150 "Parking and Storage Behind Required Front Yard Setback", and Section 23.78.155 "Parking and Storage Within a Side Yard Abutting a Street", including conducting a survey of similar ordinances from eight (8) local jurisdictions to analyze similarities and differences between regulations in those jurisdictions regarding the storage of RVs on private property. The findings of the survey were presented at the July 6, 2021, Council meeting. At that meeting, Staff requested Council to provide direction upon several policy questions. Due to the quantity of items requiring policy direction, the Council opted to create an Ad -Hoc Committee ("Committee") related to RV parking.
The Committee consisted of Councilmember Yamaguchi, Councilmember Smith, and Development Services Department staff, with the goal of analyzing and potentially amending existing RV parking regulations if directed to do so by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council take the following action:
1. Review the presentation and ask any questions of Staff and the RV Parking Ad -Hoc Committee; and
2. Provide policy direction on any potential municipal code amendments related to RV parking; and
3. Based upon said policy guidance, direct Staff to prepare the necessary amendments to be considered by the City Council at a future meeting.
3. b.
Mar. 15, 2022
City Council Agenda
March 15, 2022
DISCUSSION:
According to the RV Industry Association, a national trade group representing manufacturers and component suppliers producing approximately 98% of all RVs manufactured in North America, during 2020 and 2021, RV sales throughout the country hit a record high with 11.2 million households owning an RV in 2021, up 62% over 6.9 million households in 2001, and 26% more than the 8.9 million RV -owning households reported in 2011. The COVID-19 pandemic served as a catalyst to this recent rise in RV ownership, in which families were seeking alternative means of travel in a safe and socially distanced manner.
Conversely, the sudden rise of RV ownership has put a strain upon an already limited supply of RV storage facilities throughout the Orange County region. With a supply shortage of storage facilities and rates ranging between $50 and $500 per month depending upon the type of storage needed and requested amenities, residents have been storing RVs on their own residential properties. This has resulted in an uptick in RV complaints from neighbors and subsequent issuance of citations by the City's Code Enforcement Division. However, Staff continues to receive complaints regarding RVs parked in driveways and along the City streets.
At the April 20, 2021, Council meeting, Staff was directed to research the City's current RV regulations within single-family residential districts related to the storage of RVs on private property. Staff evaluated existing PMC Sections 23.78.145 "Parking and Storage within Required Front Yard Setback", 23.78.150 "Parking and Storage Behind Required Front Yard Setback", and
23.78.155 "Parking and Storage Within a Side Yard Abutting a Street". Upon review of the aforementioned PMC Sections, Staff noted that the City's current regulations only permit RV storage within the front yard setback of a single-family residential lot if it is motorized or mounted to a truck body with an approved Special Use Permit by the Development Services Director. All non -motorized RVs or similar apparatuses are required to be located outside of the front yard setback and within side and rear yards of a property.
In addition, Staff conducted a survey of similar ordinances from eight (8) local jurisdictions to analyze similarities and differences between regulations in those jurisdictions regarding the storage of RVs on private property. The local jurisdictions surveyed included the cities of Fullerton, Yorba Linda, Brea, Anaheim, Orange, La Habra, Buena Park, and Santa Ana. Upon an analysis of the conducted survey, it was determined that four (4) out of 10 noted regulatory requirements were not consistent with other jurisdictions. The inconsistencies can be found in the following areas: (1) mandating a permit for RV storage within the front yard setback area of a single-family lot, (2) having separate development standards between motorized RVs and non -motorized RVs, and (3) not having requirements for RVs located within street side yards as well as RV screening requirements.
The findings of the survey were presented at the July 6, 2021, Council meeting. At that meeting, Staff requested Council to provide direction upon several policy questions. Due to the quantity of items requiring policy direction, the Council opted to create the aforementioned Committee related to RV parking.
City Council Agenda
March 15, 2022
The Committee met on September 16, and November 15, 2021, and resolved several regulatory questions with exception of those noted below. If the City Council wishes to proceed with amending the existing RV parking ordinance, Staff seeks policy guidance on the following subject areas:
• Minimum setback distance of recreational vehicles and/or similar apparatuses located within the front yard area of a single-family residential property. • Maximum requirements for the percentage of paving within the front yard area of a single- family residential property.
• Maximum number of recreational vehicles and/or similar apparatuses within the front yard of a single-family residential property.
Prepared by:
Andrew Gonza e
Senior Planner
Reviewed and approved:
Damien R. Arrula
City Administrator
Reviewed and approved:
Jbs€ph M. ambert
Director of Development Services
Attachments:
1. Draft Code Amendment Language Related to Off -Street Parking of Recreational Vehicles
2. PowerPoint Related to Parking of Off -Street Parking of Recreational Vehicles
EXISTING ORDINANCE
23.78.175 Parking recreational vehicles.
Request to park and store a recreational vehicle anywhere within the front area other than what is prescribed in Section 2. 1,11,(b) of the Placentia Municipal Code shall be subject to a Special Use Permit pursuant to the following procedures:
(1) An application for a Special Use Permit for parking a recreational vehicle anywhere within the front yard area other than what is prescribed in Section 23.78.145(b) of the Placentia Municipal Code shall be submitted to the city planning division for the review and approval of the director of development services.
(2) The application shall include a detailed site plan showing the precise location of the proposed parking and storage area with full dimensions, the latest prescribed fee pursuant to city council resolution and all other items listed on the recreational vehicle parking submittal requirements on file with the City Planning Division.
(3) A decision date shall be set a minimum of twenty-one (21) days from the date of accepting the completed application.
(4) Not less than ten (10) days prior to the decision date by the director of development services, notice of the proposed use shall be mailed to all property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll within a one hundred (100) foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the subject property.
(5) A decision on the permit shall be based on the potential impact to the surrounding neighborhood and shall be made by the director of development services without a hearing unless one is requested by either the applicant or other affected person. If so requested, the hearing would be scheduled for the next available planning commission meeting. (6) The decision of the director of development services shall be final unless appealed in writing to the planning commission by the applicant or any other interested person (as defined in Chapter 23.04) within ten (10) calendar days. (Ord. 0-2007-07 § 37, 2007; Ord. 0-2001-5 § 5, 2001)
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
23.78.175 Off -Street Parking of Recreational Vehicles
23.78.175.010 Scope.
The standards specified within this chapter shall govern all privately owned lots or parcels within the City that are designated as single-family residential uses or located within low-density, single- family zoning districts.
23.78.175.020 Definitions.
The following words and phrases shall be construed to have the following meanings, unless it is apparent from the context that a different meaning is intended:
a) "City" means the City of Placentia.
b) "Coun t ;e -County- Orange,
N:\CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS\Staff Reports\2022\03-15-2022\3 b Recreational Vehicle Parking Study Session \1. Recommended Code Amendments RV Parking - VER4 2-23-22,docx ATTACHMENT 1
c) "Director" means the Director of the Development Services Department. d) •Marler•Island"-is -an •unincorporated-Ora ngeCour+ty-Island-ourrounded-try-the-r nicipal houndarias•4 the -City niiI;-uninsorpecatedareas-sommanly-referred-to-as-Mamer-lsland and -is -comprised -of 7-.5•-acres;,30 s.irgie-amll„ homes and 1,045 county --residents rlalatively-located -on-the north -and south.sides-of - rba-Linda-BouIevardbetween Valencia -Avenue -and -Rose Dave:
kiarneF-Island- iap---Erhitait 23-1
11111111 1 111
^fir.., 4.4
r 714,401.
Ern'
I.
Ilia
11111
fl
11111
....,Pl. -■■...�
��i wk*A`e 1 iii_ 2 b 111111w �IIH.II
p �f�r 3 m 1 ul:Fit
re FitV
44•
Wier
r Pia !11
41k 4il
Y.
r
Ili
11�F,
MUM
e) "Owner" means any person, partnership, association, corporation, fiduciary or other legal entity having a legal or equitable title or any interest in real property. f) "Recreational Vehicle" means a motorhome, travel trailer, truck camper, camping trailer, or other vehicle or trailer, with or without motive power, designed or altered for human habitation for recreational, emergency, or other human occupancy. "Recreational vehicle" specifically includes, but is not limited to: a "recreational vehicle", as defined by California Vehicle Code Section 243, provided, however, that a "camper" does not include a "camper shell", which means a structure designed to be mounted upon a motor vehicle that provides shelter from the elements but does not contain plumbing, refrigeration, cooking, heating, electrical equipment or other facilities for human habitation; a "camper trailer," as defined by California Vehicle Code Section 242; a "fifth wheel travel trailer", as defined by California Vehicle Code Section 324; a "house car", as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 362; a "trailer", as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 630; a "trailer coach", as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 635; a "mobile home", as defined by California Vehicle Code Section 396; a "park trailer", as defined by California Health and N:\CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS\Staff Reports \2022\03-15-202213.b. Recreational Vehicle Parking Study Session\1 Recommended Code Amendments RV Parking - VER4 2-23-22.docx ATTACHMENT 1 Commented [AG1]: Per DA direction, any reference to
Hamer Island needs to be removed. Possible future
amendment to address the Hamer Island area.
g)
Safety Code Section 18009.3; a "truck camper", as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 18013.4; a van camper; and/or a van conversion. "Recreational apparatus" means any device which may be used for camping or recreational purposes, and which is not currently registered for operation on public streets, including, but not limited to, a jet ski, sea doo, wave runner, all -terrain vehicle, motor bike, boat, airplane, glider, off-highway vehicle or other device uses for recreational purposes. h) Resident" means a person who customarily resides and maintains a primary place of residence or who owns land within the city. It shall not mean a person who maintains an address at a mailbox drop or who rents a room which is not his or her primary place of residence nor shall it mean a person who maintains only a post office box. i) "Out-of-town visitor" means any person who does not reside in the city who is temporarily visiting as a guest of a resident of the city.
23.78.175.030 General Requirements
a) Any recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus shall at no time create a sight obstruction that poses any potential safety hazard(s).
b) No part of any recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus shall extend over any public sidewalk or rights-of-way.
c) The parking of any inoperable, wrecked or dismantled recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus on any residential property shall be strictly prohibited. d) At no time shall a recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus be used for temporary or permanent dwelling purposes.
e) At no time shall a recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus engage in the act of cooking or any other activity that involves the act of heating or warming of food. f) A recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus shall not be permanently connected to electricity, sewer lines or water lines. A recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus may be connected to electricity temporarily for a period not to exceed 24 hours for the sole purpose of charging batteries and cleaning only.
g) The parking of recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus shall be limited to only those vehicles or apparatuses owned by the property owner and/or resident of the property. h) The recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus shall not be used for storage of goods, materials, or equipment other than those items considered to be part of the vehicle or apparatus or essential for its immediate use.
N:\CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS\Staff Reports\2022\03-15-2022\3 b. Recreational Vehicle Parking Study Session\1 Recommended Code Amendments RV Parking - VER4 2-23-22 docx ATTACHMENT 1
23.78.175.040 Storage — Front Yard and Street Side Yard a) A recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus shall not be parked or stored within a front yard where the following condition exists -
1) A legally permitted garage or three (3) sided carport onsite that can fully accommodate the storage of a recreation vehicle or recreational apparatus. 2) A legally permitted driveway or other paved accessway that provides full and unrestricted access to a street side, interior side, or rear yard of the residence that can fully accommodate the storage of a recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus in compliance with PMC Section 23.78.175.040. 3) The recreation vehicle or recreational apparatus will not block access to more than one-half of the required onsite parking for the respective residence as mandated by the minimum off-street parking requirements for single-family lots prescribed within PMC Section 23.78.030
b) IA maximum of one ) recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus may be located within the front yard area
c) IThe recreational vehicle is parked and setback a, minimum of ten (10) feet from the front lot line, measured from the existing street right-of-way line, typically the edge of the sidewalk closet to the residence, to the outermost point of the primary body of the recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus. The trailer tongue, hitch, and/or similar appurtenances are not subject to the setback provision but shall not encroach into any designated right -or -way.[
d) No vehicle, recreational vehicle, or recreational apparatus may be parked on an unpaved surface within the front yard, except on an all-weather surface, subject to the review and approval by the Director.
e) Parking and driveway areas within the entire front yard area shall not exceed fifty-five percent (55%) of such yard area; for lots at the end of cul-de-sac with a lot of frontage of less than forty (40) feet, the parking and driveway areas within the entire front yard may be paved up to a maximum of eighty percent (80%), all subject to the Director's review and approval.
f) A recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus shall be parked/stored at a perpendicular angle to the front property line, including a vehicle or apparatus stored on a property improved with on circular driveway.
g) Additional curb cutting for driveway widening shall be prohibited if reasonable access can be made from existing driveways. At the discretion of the Public Works Department, the driveway widening provision may be waived if extenuating circumstances exist on the subject property whereby the widening of an existing driveway is necessary.
N:\CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS\Staff Reports \2022\03-15-2022\3.b. Recreational Vehicle Parking Study Session\1. Recommended Code Amendments RV Parking - VER4 2-23-22.docx ATTACHMENT 1 •
Commented [AG2]: Policy direction required from City
Council.
Commented [AG3]: Policy direction required from City
Council.
Commented [AG4]: Policy direction required from City
Council
h) All recreational vehicles and recreational apparatuses located within the front yard area shall be maintained and kept free from any debris and/or trash located underneath and/or around the vehicle or apparatus. The vehicle or apparatus shall have no visible signs of deterioration so as to render the vehicle or apparatus which by reason of its appearance as viewed at ground level either from the public right-of-way or neighboring premises as detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of individuals residing within the immediate or within the surrounding community.
i) All recreational vehicles and recreational apparatuses located within the front yard area parked for a period of more than 72 hours shall be equipped with appropriate tire covers, rubberized wheel/tire chocks, trailer jack, and fitted trailer or recreational vehicle covers.
These items shall be well-maintained and not be in a state of disrepair. All vehicle or apparatus covers shall be prohibited from using non -fitted tarps, cloth sheets, furniture covers, and/or similar coverings not intended for exterior use. 1)
A recreational vehicle or recreational apparatus stored within the street side yard shall be screened behind an approved wall or fence and gate. Acceptable screen method shall include a minimum six-foot high solid masonry wall or non -open work fence or gate as determined as appropriate by the Director.
k) The entire front yard and street side yard shall be kept and maintained free and clear of all construction and automotive materials or parts, trash, refuse, debris, trash storage receptacles, inoperative motor vehicles, discarded or broken materials, appliances, furniture, junk, equipment, or similar materials.
I) Emergency or minor repair of a motor vehicle owned by the person residing upon the lot or parcel may be conducted on an otherwise inoperative motor vehicle such that the emergency or minor repair shall be concluded within 72 hours of parking of the vehicle or apparatus.
23.78.175.40 Storage — Side Yard and Rear Yard
a) No vehicle, recreational vehicle, or recreational apparatus may be parked on an unpaved surface within the side and rear yard, except on an all-weather surface, subject to the review and approval of the Director.
b) All recreational vehicles and recreational apparatuses located within the side and rear yard area shall be maintained and kept free from any debris and/or trash located underneath and/or around the vehicle or apparatus. The vehicle or apparatus shall have no visible signs of deterioration so as to render the vehicle or apparatus which by reason of its appearance as viewed at ground level either from the public right-of-way or neighboring premises as detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of individuals residing within the immediate or within the surrounding community. c) The entire side yard and rear side yard shall be kept and maintained free and clear of all construction and automotive materials or parts, trash, refuse, debris, trash storage N:\CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS\Staff Reports\2022\03-15-2022\3 b Recreational Vehicle Parking Study Session\1 Recommended Code Amendments RV Parking - VER4 2-23-22 docx ATTACHMENT 1
receptacles, inoperative motor vehicles, discarded or broken materials, appliances, furniture, junk, equipment, or similar materials.
23.78.175.050 -Exceptions
a) This section does not apply to the regulatory requirements of Chapter 13.48 (Stopping.
Standing or Parking) of Title 13 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Placentia Municipal Code. tr) e-previsions-:entaiRe6vvithie-this sae4ion--sga1i-not--app area-ef-the-e+ty-reerred to-ar,44err►er-Wared1.-All-re@uirements-per4aini te-said-area-shat adt e-te-foilewiag fequirementsbelewa
VEHICLE -STORAGE -ANI) -PARKING -REGULATIONS
Parking and Storage
Operations
t eriio -stege-iFlGiosed
sornpletety-within-a-building
ire -a' tl r^ :here-It4s
net--visible-for -the-street•ar
other-pat'riis cam -private
property,
Otter -residential -storage
options,
Stored -or pariaa 1 -on -paved
arcs t uFi,.^.eets-the-,r^tlawiHg
criteria:
a•)--A.paved-ar -that•ts
net-with144required
butlkling-setback-,area
street excluding
altoys-arrd,
b)--Ssreerned-by-a-6-foot
high-per;m,. rieR send
opaque-#erase-er-walF:
Te--tense-or-wall
RE iDi=NTIAf ZONES AND
RESIDENT -ALLY--
vv
DEVrrisoEL-PRQI2 R -T4
Vehislesand I Abandoned;
ReeFeationc wreeked,
Vehieles tiismantted-of
inepecative
vehiclee, er
part-thereof7
p p
p
N:\CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS\Staff Reports \2022\03-15-2022\3 b Recreational Vehicle Parking Study Session\1. Recommended Code Amendments RV Parking - VER4 2-23-22.docx ATTACHMENT 1
a;-raaintaiaed4fr
applicable
development
standanis-fGF•fent4S
and-wal s- Apntained ill
Z-Alliftg-Gede=`,A'^
�y alcso
storage -area:
c)--The-exception-to
subparagraphs-a=and
b. above -is --that
vehi le-may-t?e-etGred
or -parking -14 a -paved
driveway-conneolin -a
garage•or Garpor#with
a-public-orOvate
street,
Stared -or -parking on -any
unpaved--swrfzja, axiipas
perrnitted-above•
P -=-Permitted
.�PFehibitedi
N:\CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS\Staff Reports \2022\03-15-2022\all Recreational Vehicle Parking Study Session \1. Recommended Code Amendments RV Parking - VER4 2-23-22.docx ATTACHMENT 1 Commented [AG5]: Per DA direction, any reference to
Hamer Island needs to be removed. Possible future
amendment to address the Hamer Island area.
Single -Family Residential RV
Parking Study Session
March 1512022
• 11.2 million households owning an RV in 2021, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a catalyst for the recent rise in RV ownership.
• Increased RV ownerships, limitations in locations to store RVs, and high RV storage rental rates has resulted in RVs to be stored on residential properties.
• Rise in RV ownership led to an uptick in RV complaints regarding the placement of such vehicles or apparatuses. • Complaints prompted the City to reevaluate the RV parking requirements, which only allows the storage of motorized RVs within the front yard area of a single-family property.
ATTACHMENT 2
10 PO
• On July 6, 2021, the City Council formed an Ad-hoc Committee to resolve several policy questions raised by City Staff. • Ad-hoc Committee meet on September 16, 2021, and
November 15, 2021, and discussed several policy questions related to site placement, visual screening, use restrictions, maintenance and provided specific direction for discussion before City Council:
1. Minimum setback distance of recreational vehicles
and/or similar apparatuses within the front yard area.
2. Maximum percentage of paving within the front yard
area.
Maximum number of recreational vehicles and/or similar
apparatuses within the front yard.
ATTACHMENT 2
Garage
SCENARIO 11 SCENARIO 2
Permitted '
1 Prohibited
Driveway % Landscape
House
1._1
Permitted
P1 Prohibited
CL
rci
-10
x Driveway % Landscape %
•
ATTACHMENT 2
- W
Property Line
7 7
Property Line
Property Line
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 2
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
DATE:
Placentia City Council
AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DEPUTY CITY ADMINISTRATOR / PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE MARCH 15, 2022
SUBJECT: PRESENTATION OF TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS ON HEMINGWAY
AVENUE AND COBB AVENUE
FISCAL
IMPACT: None
SUMMARY:
Staff received neighborhood speeding complaints from residents on Hemingway and Cobb Avenues in 2020. In response to public interest in addressing traffic and/or speeding concerns in residential neighborhoods, on July 20, 2021, the City Council adopted a formal Speed Hump Installation Policy (Policy). The adopted Policy, among other things, utilizes a tiered approach toward addressing traffic calming and directs Staff to implement non-physical (Phase I) traffic calming measures as the first step of traffic calming evaluation process, and prior to considering speed humps.
In May/June 2021, the Policy's Phase I traffic calming improvements were implemented on Hemingway and Cobb Avenues to address neighborhood speeding concerns. Speed surveys on these two streets were completed six (6) months after implementing the traffic calming measures and as the data indicates, the traffic calming measures worked in reducing neighborhood traffic speeds. A presentation summarizing the traffic conditions before and after the Phase I traffic calming improvements is attached to this agenda report.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council take the following action:
Receive and file this report and presentation.
DISCUSSION:
Several residents on Hemingway Avenue approached Staff in 2020 regarding concerns of vehicles speeding and cutting the corner at the T -intersection between Hemingway Avenue and Faulkner Drive. Neighborhood residents requested the City install a series of speed humps and stop signs to control vehicle speeds. Staff conducted a 24-hour speed survey in August 2020 and
3. c.
Mar. 15, 2022
City Council Agenda
March 15, 2022
the data indicated at that time that vehicle speeds were normal. However, the City did install edge/centerline striping around the T -intersection to encourage motorists not to cut the corner and risk a collision with an approaching vehicle at that intersection.
Hemingway Avenue did not qualify for speed humps based upon the existing speed hump guidelines at that time and neighborhood residents remained in communication with Staff and City Council members, both of which met residents onsite to discuss their concerns. In May 2021, pursuant to a request from neighborhood residents, the City conducted a seven-day speed survey which is six (6) days more than the typical standard speed survey. The results of the seven-day survey were consistent with the previous one -day speed data and did not indicate any speeding issue. Regardless, the City installed a series of traffic calming measures in the form of new edge striping, centerline striping, and new speed limit signs and legends designed to constrict travel lanes to encourage motorist to slow down as an incremental approach to addressing neighborhood concerns. Once the traffic calming improvements were installed, Staff advised residents that the City would conduct a new seven-day speed survey six (6) months later to gauge the effectiveness of the traffic calming measures.
The residents on Cobb Avenue first approached Staff in fall 2020 expressing the concerns of vehicles speeding on their residential street and requested the City to install a number of speed humps on Cobb Avenue between McCormack Lane and Spahn Lane. Staff conducted a 24-hour speed survey in September 2020 and the data indicated the street did indeed have speeding issues, however the street does not meet the minimum requirements for speed hump consideration. To address speeding concerns, the City implemented a series of traffic calming improvements by installing edge/centerline striping along with new speed limit signs and speed legends on Cobb Avenue.
In December 2021, two-day speed counts were collected on Cobb Avenue and seven-day speed counts were collected on Hemingway Avenue. The speed data in the tables below show that the incremental approach to managing neighborhood speeding concerns have been effective in reducing the vehicle speeds, particularly on Cobb Avenue.
Cobb Avenue
85th percentile speed
Average speed
Average Daily Traffic
September - 2020 December - 2021
(Pre -Improvement) (Post Improvement)
36 mph
23 mph
240 vehicles per day
26 mph
20 mph
135 vehicles per day
Hemingway Avenue August - 2020 May - 2021 December - 2021 (Pre -Improvement) (Pre -Improvement) (Post Improvement) 85th percentile speed 32 mph 32 mph 31 mph
Average speed 25 mph 25 mph 24 mph
Average Daily Traffic 294 vehicles per day 250 vehicles per day 290 vehicles per day
City Council Agenda
March 15, 2022
On July 20, 2021, the City Council approved a formal Speed Hump Installation Policy that updated the evaluation process and design criteria for the installation of speed humps as well as adopting an incremental approach toward implementing traffic speed mitigation measures to address residential traffic and/or speeding concerns. Speed humps have been used as a traffic calming device in various locations around the City to help reduce neighborhood vehicle speeds and cut - through traffic. They provide a vertical change in the roadway intended to reduce the speed of vehicles traveling along that road. Because physical alteration to the roadway pavement is required for installing speed humps, there are some disadvantages associated with speed humps.
As a result, some jurisdictions have adopted a two -phased neighborhood traffic management implementation plan that includes non-physical roadway improvements such as those installed on Cobb and Hemingway Avenues as Phase I options, to reduce vehicle speeds and improve safety. Phase I improvements include any traffic calming measure that does not require significant physical changes to the roadway. Non-physical traffic calming improvements such as edge and centerline striping and posted speed limit signs are intended to increase drivers' awareness of surroundings and influence driver behavior and are designed and implemented as incremental solutions before considering physical changes to the roadway.
A detailed presentation summarizing the traffic conditions before and after Phase I improvements on Hemingway and Cobb Avenues is attached to this agenda report. Staff presented this before and after study to the Streetscape and Transportation Advisory Commission ("STAC") on January 24, 2022. The Commission directed Staff to continue the incremental traffic calming approaches by using the Phase I improvements as the first step to address neighborhood speeding complaints. In addition to the adopted Speed Hump Policy, the development of an in-depth draft Neighborhood Traffic Management Toolkit ("NTMT") is underway. Staff shared a working outline of a proposed NTMT with the STAC for their input on January 24, 2022. With the Commission's input a draft of the proposed NTMT will be presented to the City Council for its consideration and formal adoption at a future date. The recently adopted Speed Hump Policy will be included in the final draft of the NTMT.
Prepared by: Reviewed approved:
KY a Tao
Transportation Manager
Reviewed and approved:
Damien R. Arrula
City Administrator
Luis Estevez
Deputy City Administrator
Attachment:
Presentation — Hemingway and Cobb Avenue Traffic Calming Improvements
eitv 4 Peaceetta .i,...1
Hemingway and Cobb Avenue Traf i
Calming Improvement Update
March 15, 2022
ATTACHMENT 1
Presentation Outline
1. Background
2. Adopted Speed Hump Policy
3. Two -Phased Neighborhood Traffic Calming Approach
4. Hemingway Ave. Traffic Calming Improvements
5. Cobb Ave. Traffic Calming Improvements
6. Before and After Study Summary
ATTACHMENT 1
Background
HEMINGWAY AVENUE:
■ The residents first contacted Staff in 2020 regarding vehicles speeding and cutting the corner at the Hemingway and Faulkner T -intersection. • Installed centerline striping around T -intersection to address the issue of vehicles cutting the corner.
• Implemented edge/centerline striping, speed limit sign and speed legend on Hemingway and Faulkner Streets in June 2021, to address the issue of vehicles speeding.
• Conducted speed survey three times in Aug 2020, May 2021, and Dec 2021, for a total of 15 days.
COBB AVENUE:
• The residents first contacted Staff in 2020 regarding vehicles speeding on Cobb Avenue.
■ Implemented edge and centerline striping, speed limit sign and speed legend in May 2021, to address the issue of vehicles speeding. • Conducted speed survey two times in Sept 2020 and Dec 2021, for a total of three (3) days.
ATTACHMENT 1
Speed Hump Policy
(Resolution No. R-2021-49)
ATTACHMENT 1
Speed Hump Policy
ELIGIBLE STREET:
1. Local - Street shall not be designated as an arterial or collector on City, County, State or Federal plans.
2. Residential - Majority of abutting development shall be fronting or side -on single family residential.
3. Minimum Length Uninterrupted by Stop Signs or Traffic Signals — 800 feet.
4. Maximum Average Daily Traffic Volume - 3,000 vehicles.
5. Maximum Speed Limit - 25 miles per hour.
6. Minimum Speed Profile - 85th percentile speed must exceed 35 miles per hour.
7. Not a bus route or a priority route for emergency services.
Speed Hump
PROS:
• Reduce traffic speeds — Traffic on
street with the speed hump
decreases by 20 to 25%
■ Discourage neighborhood cut -
through traffic
■ Relatively inexpensive when
compared to other traffic calming
measures
r>I
i-}
CONS:
• Delay emergency vehicles response time
• Increase traffic volumes on adjacent streets
• Increase noise levels
• Street maintenance costs increase due to additional labor and materials
• Potential public liability for damaged vehicles and increased claims
ATTACHMENT 1
Two -Phased Traffic Calming Approach
PHASE I: NON-PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS
• Centerline/Edgeline Striping
• Signage
• Speed Legend
• Speed Radar Trailer
• Police Enforcement
PHASE PHYSICAL INTRUSIVE TREATMENTS
• Speed Humps
1. Raised Crosswalk
• Traffic Circle/Roundabout
• Curb Extension
•IiVitil•
• r.11-
ATTACHMENT 1
STOP SIGN INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS
• Installation of stop signs governed by the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Design
• Used to assign right-of-way and control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes • Not used for Speed Control
• Warrant Analysis
❑ Crash Record — 5+ crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a stop installation.
❑ Traffic Volumes - 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hour of an average day
❑ Vehicle Speed - 85th -percentile approach speed exceeds 40 mph
Hemingway Avenue
Traffic Calming Improvements
ATTACHMENT 1
Traffic Calming Improvements
Hemingway Avenue
„r,. t klot 1 ..V4 -ss # It • /N
. •
.P1
• p TX/S; "PI I I-
r "
P W • I:
Michel
ofI_*im kdo. a...a• ••••••• 9.
11111:,416 15'A
i- 4.-., • ,
A J
II 85th Percentile Speed: 32 mph
Street Length: 750 feet
24-hour speed survey on
Hemingway on 8/18/2020
r . f I ' i i .. . ;A : .0 I • "4
.P
, - • • ••• .1' 0 et '.
- •Ad 1; l',. '..,:. ! ;:i.,
; M.1
`....:i..,L, .1 ,,i 0.,...1..... .. l f ! ' • 'i
(--.:1, IA .—". v; • ' :.! il P
-a ,. : • !.
NIP .0 `7'...
1 0 ... • r I. «Lw$1 '
f
VI
-1:
A
.. . Average Daily Traffic: 294
1 r • P.
vehicles/day
. ,.,
Trunipel Age
..,,,u
..4r4., ..
iki., .1
i,..g.
0. •
• t . C '1 mo,2„ A e .,
opr.,4
lks. Ilk
464 I
tit;.
S; ist.t 111•S•7'.."4 Jo( i m
.
MENT 1
Traffic Calming Improvements
Hemingway Avenue
\REFLECTIVE MARKERS
1.7 Double yellow centerline was
installed in September 2020, to
address speeding and corner
cutting concerns at the T
intersection
24-hour speed survey on
Hemingway from 5/26/2021 to
6/1/2021
■ 85th Percentile Speed: 31- 32
mph
■ Average Daily Traffic: 255
vehicles/day
Traffic Calming Improvements
Hemingway/Faulkner Avenues
Striping Improvement - Hemingway
Striping Improvement - Faulkner
Non -Physical Traffic Calming Improvement implemented in June 2021
24-hour speed survey on Hemingway from 12/12/2021 to 12/18/2021 ■ 85th Percentile Speed: 31 mph
▪ Average Daily Traffic: 290 vehicles/day
12 ATTA MENT 1
Traffic Calming Improvements
Hemingway Avenue
Replaced Advance Warning Sign in December 2021, to increase motorist awareness of the cul-de sac
ATTACHMENT 1
Cobb Avenue
Traffic Calming Improvements
Traffic Calming Improvements
Cobb Avenue
Street Length: 650 feet
24-hour speed survey on 9/2/2020
■ 85th Percentile Speed: 35- 36 mph
■ Average Daily Traffic: 235
vehicles/day
Residents submitted speed hump
petition in October 2020 — street did not
meet minimum qualifications for speed
humps under old guidelines as well as
new policy standards
ATTACHMENT 1
Traffic Calming Improvements
Cobb Avenue
Street Length: 650 feet
Non -Physical Traffic Calming
Improvements implemented in May
2021
24-hour speed survey on 12/15/2021 and
12/17/2021
• 85th Percentile Speed: 26 mph
■ Average Daily Traffic: 135
vehicles/day
Phase 1 Improvements
Before & After Study
Traffic Calming Improvements
Before and After Summary
Cobb Avenue
85th percentile speed
Average speed
Average Daily Traffic
Hemingway Avenue
85th percentile speed
Average speed
Average Daily Traffic
Sept- 2020
(Pre -Improvement)
36 mph
23 mph
240 vehicles per day
Aug -2020
(Pre -Improvement)
32 mph
25 mph
294 vehicles per day
Dec -2021
(Post Improvement)
26 mph
20 mph
135 vehicles per day
May -2021
(Pre -Improvement)
32 mph
25 mph
250 vehicles per day
Dec -2021
(Post Improvement)
31 mph
24 mph
290 vehicles per day
Questions?