Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Placentia City Council
September 6, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
September 6, 2022
Body
Placentia City Council
Pages
16
Original file
787 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

DISCUSSION:

Subject Site and Surrounding Land Uses
The following table shows the lot size of each proposed parcel. Specific Plan 7 (SP -7) Site Development Standards (listed in Table 3 of the SP -7 document) states the average Low Density Residential lot in SP -7 shall be 7,000 square feet on average and at a minimum, lots shall be 6,000 square feet. As the proposed lots meet the minimum lot size and are between 6,000 – 8,000 square feet, the proposed subdivision appears to meet the intent of SP -7 regarding lot size, as demonstrated in the table below.

Parcel No. Lot Size (square feet) Lot Size (acres) Minimum Required Lot Size
in SP -7 (LDR
Designation)
1 8,273 square feet .19 acres 6,000 square feet
2 7,537 square feet .17 acres 6,000 square feet
The subject site is located within an existing single-family residential district at 412 N. Tidland Circle (Assessor's Parcel Number 341-433-34). The parcel is located on the southern end of N. Tidland Circle, on the eastern side of the cul-de-sac. The table below shows surrounding existing land uses, and General Plan and Specific Plan Land Use designations. The site contains an oil well on what is proposed as "Lot 2", which will be abandoned by CALGEM standards and requirements, as well as pursuant to local Fire Department standards.

Location
Existing General Plan Land Zoning Map
Land Use Use Element Designation
Designation
Subject Site Vacant Specific Plan SP -7 (Specific
Plan 7)
North, South Single -Family Specific Plan SP -7
(across La Residential
Paloma Ave),
East, & West
Applicable Code Section – Placentia Municipal Code
Specific Plan
Land Use
Designation
Low Density
Residential
Low Density
Residential
Section 23.107.070 of the PMC sets forth development standards defining the minimum lot width, lot depth, and lot area for Low Density Residential (LDR) districts in Specific Plan 7. As previously stated, the SP -7 LDR development standards require a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet for all interior lots and a minimum frontage and width of 60 feet. The proposed subdivision meets these standards. The subdivision proposes two lots—Lot 1: 8,273 -square feet, with a street

City Council Agenda
September 6, 2022

Page 3 of 4 ends

frontage of 76.23 feet and Lot 2: 7,537 -square feet, with a street frontage of 73.05 feet. The proposed lots are of a similar lot size to the lots surrounding the subject site.

Parcels Minimum Lot Size 6,000 Minimum Lot Width 60'
square feet
Lot 1 8,273 square feet 76.23 feet
Lot 2 7,537 square feet 73.05 feet
ENVIRONMENTAL:

The proposed application was reviewed by Staff in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq., the State CEQA Guidelines, 14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et seq., and the Environmental Guidelines of the City of Placentia. As part of their actions taken on July 12, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council find that TPM 2022-126 is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15315 (Class 15 - Minor Land Divisions), as it applies to the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for residential use into four or fewer parcels, when the division is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous two years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than twenty percent (20%). The proposed subdivision meets all criteria for this exemption, therefore Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of a categorical exemption pursuant to §15315 (Class 15 - Minor Land Divisions).

CONCLUSION:

The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan and meets the minimum development standards of the PMC. Including the recommended conditions of approval, the proposed subdivision located within the existing SP -7 Zoning District will be compatible with adjacent land uses and will not result in any adverse impacts to the surrounding area.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Pursuant to PMC Chapter 5.02 all new development is subject to Citywide Development Impact Fees. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will result in two (2) additional lots that will be eligible for development. Based on the zoning designation, one single family residence can be developed on the resulting new lots of parcels 1 and 2. The subsequent construction of two (2) new homes will result in approximately $15,764 of total Development Impact Fee revenue. It should be noted that future construction will also require payment of user fees such as building plan check and building permit fees.

City Council Agenda
September 6, 2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

Prepared + Reviewed and approved:

Lesley
Associa
Reviewed and approved:

Jennifer Lampman
Director of Finance
Jo"h M. La 'ert
Dire tor of Development Services
Reviewed and approved:

Damien R. Arrula
City Administrator
Attachments:

1. Resolution No. R-2022-58 Related to TPM 2022-126
Attachment A: Conditions of Approval for TPM 2022-126

2. TPM 2022-126 Subdivision Map

3. Vicinity/Zoning Map

RESOLUTION NO. R-2022-58

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CATEGORICAL

EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
§§ 21000-21177 AND §15000 ET SEQ. OF TITLE 14 OF THE

CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS) (CEQA) AND
APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) 2022-126

PERTAINING TO THE SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 421 N. TIDLAND CIRCLE (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
341-433-34) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.

WHEREAS, On July 12, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Placentia conducted, and concluded, a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, recommending to the City Council of the City of Placentia, approval of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 2022-126 for the property located at 421 N. Tidland Circle.

WHEREAS, The Planning Commission heard testimony, received a report and other relevant information from City staff and members of the public including Blain Meith ("Applicant" hereinafter), regarding a Tentative Parcel Map application.

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

B. Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.

Section 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this City Council with regard to the Application, including written staff reports, verbal testimony and development plans, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The proposed project will not be: (1) detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed development or within the city, or (2) injurious to the property or improvements within the neighborhood or within the city. The subject subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems. Subject to compliance with the attached Conditions of Approval set forth in Attachment "1.A." of the staff report (Attachment A to this Resolution) and by this reference incorporated herein and Standard Development Resolution R-2022-58

Page 1 of 4 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Requirements, the project complies with all applicable code requirements and development standards of the "SP -7" Specific Plan 7 (Low Density Residential subarea) Residential Zoning District and Title 22, and with other applicable regulations of the Placentia Municipal Code (PMC).
b. The proposed use is consistent with the City's General Plan.

The General Plan Land Use designation for the subject site low-density residential, and the proposed use does not involve any change in the allowable land use of the subject site. The proposed project involves the subdivision of a 0.36 -acre parcel into two single family residential parcels consistent with the "SP -7" Specific Plan 7 (Low Density Residential subarea) and the General Plan. Therefore, the site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development.
c. The proposed project as presented in the staff report and accompanying plans complies with all requirements of Chapter 23.107 of the PMC. City Staff carefully examined the proposed subdivision against the applicable development regulations prescribed in Title 23 (Zoning Ordinance) and determined it to be in substantial compliance. The proposed subdivision includes Conditions of Approval and Standard Development Requirements to ensure full compliance with applicable code requirements and to ensure full compliance with the General Plan, and with applicable design improvements required therein.
d. Conditions necessary to secure the purposes of this section, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions are made part of this Tentative Parcel Map approval. Attachment "1.A" of the staff report (Attachment A to this Resolution) contain Conditions of Approval and Standard Development requirements specific to this application in order to provide assurances that the proposed subdivision and related on and off-site improvements are in compliance with applicable requirements of the PMC.
e. That the proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and with all provisions of Title 22 of the PMC. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map application is to subdivide an existing 0.36 acre parcel into two single family residential lots. The proposed map is consistent with all polices, programs, and goals of the General Plan.
f. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. As part of the review of the application, an extensive record research was completed. Additionally, the application submitted a preliminary title report with their application.
g. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure wildlife or their habitat. The subject site is an underutilized property Resolution R-2022-58

Page 2 of 4 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

that only has limited vegetation. There are no known areas within the City that host wildlife or their habitat.

Section 3. a. The City Council of the City of Placentia finds that TPM 2022-126 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq., the State CEQA Guidelines, 14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et seq., and the Environmental Guidelines of the City of Placentia pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines § 15315 (Class 15 — Minor Land Divisions) as this subdivision will result in the division of property in an urbanized area zoned for residential use into four or fewer parcels, the division is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent; b. The City Council finds and determines that, based upon the findings set forth above and below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur; and
c. The City Council finds that facts supporting the above-specified findings are contained in the staff report and exhibits, and the information provided during the public hearing conducted with respect to the Application.

Section 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein, the City Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map 2022-126, as modified herein, and specifically subject to the conditions set forth in Attachment "1.A." of the staff report (Attachment A to this Resolution) attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this 6th day of September 2022.

Rhonda Shader, Mayor
ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
Resolution R-2022-58

Page 3 of 4 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia, held on the 6th day of September 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmembers:

Councilmembers:

Councilmembers:

Councilmembers:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Resolution R-2022-58

Page 4 of 4 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Attachment A
Special Conditions of Approval for
Tentative Parcel Map 2022-126 (TPM 2022-126)
412 N. Tidland Circle (APN: 341-433-34)

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
If the above referenced application is approved, applicant and/or property owner shall comply with the Special Conditions listed below and the Standard Development Requirements attached.

ALL OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND STANDARD

DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FULLY COMPLIED WITH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW TO CONTINUE IN GOOD STANDING.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT — PLANNING DIVISION:

1. Failure to abide by and faithfully comply with any and all conditions attached to this action shall constitute grounds for revocation or amendment of said actions by the City of Placentia Planning Commission.

2. The applicant shall, as a condition of project approval, at its sole expense, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents and consultants from any claim, action, proceeding, liability or judgment against the City, its officers, employees, agents and/or consultants, which action seeks to set aside, void, annul or otherwise challenge any approval by the City Council, Planning Commission, or other City decision-making body or City staff action concerning applicant's project.

The applicant shall pay the City's defense costs, including attorney fees and all other litigation -related expenses, and shall reimburse the City for any and all court costs, which the City may be required to pay as a result of such defense. The applicant shall further pay any adverse financial award which may issue against the City including but not limited to any award of attorney fees to a party challenging such project approval. The City shall retain the right to select its counsel of choice in any action referred to herein. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of any such action.

3. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 2022-126 and the resulting Final Map is contingent upon City Council approval.

4. TPM 2022-126 shall expire twenty-four (24) months after City Council approval or conditional approval if a final map is not recorded. Upon written request, by the developer, the time limit may be extended an additional twelve (12) months by City Council.

Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

5. The developer/owner of each resulting lot shall be required to join any applicable Homeowner's Association (HOA) that the properties fall within the boundaries of.

6. A final map shall be prepared by or under the direction of a registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor in the State, as provided for in the Business and Professions Code.

7. TPM 2022-126 and the related Final Map shall comply with the applicable requirements of Title 22 Subdivisions of the Placentia Municipal Code.

8. Any modifications to the approved Tentative Parcel Map and any modifications which will change, expand or intensify the use shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Development Services. The Director of Development Services or his or her designee may determine if such modifications require approval by the Placentia Planning Commission or may be approved administratively by City staff.

9. Prior to the development of the parcels, the Applicant will provide certification of well abandonment from CALGEM (California Geologic Energy Management Division) and any mitigation measures needed for development atop and/or in proximity of any oil wells.

10. Prior to final release of the buildings for occupancy, all Special Conditions of Approval and Standard Development Requirements shall have been completed and final inspections approved.

11. Applicant/builder is responsible, at its sole cost and expense, to cause all cable, telephone, electrical, and other utility services serving the property to be placed underground within the subject site. Prior to the issuance of building permits, applicant/builder shall submit a separate utility plan for each such utility service. The utility plan shall indicate the precise location of where all cable, telephone, electrical, and other utility services serving the property will be placed underground within the subject site, as well as the points of connection at the proposed building or buildings on the site and the public right-of-way. Prior to the submittal of the utility plans to the City, the plans shall be reviewed and approved by the utility companies. Evidence of approvals shall be in the form of a signed and dated approval stamp and/or approval letter. If the precise locations of future utility services cannot be reasonably ascertained prior to the issuance of building permits, upon prior written approval of the Director of Development Services, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

Applicant/builder shall provide the City with "as built" plans showing the precise locations where all cable, telephone, electrical, and other utility services serving the property were placed underground within the subject site, as well as the points of connection at the building or buildings on the site and the public right-of-way.

12. Developer shall pay in full to the City of Placentia, any and all applicable citywide Development Impact Fees (including, but not limited to fees relating to recreational facilities, sewer facilities, transportation infrastructure, storm drain facilities, public Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

safety impacts and affordable housing impacts) adopted by and set forth by the City Council, as set forth in Chapter 5 of the Placentia Municipal Code, in effect at the time building permits are issued prior to issuance of the first building permit for each respective property.

13. Developer and/or property owner agrees to approve the incorporation of the project into Community Facilities District No. CFD 2014-01 (Public Services) pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 53311, et seq. Said annexation into CFD No. 2014-01 shall be fully completed in accordance with California law prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the project.

14. Developer and/or property owner agrees to approve the incorporation of the project into the Landscape Maintenance District No. LMD 1992-01 pursuant to the provisions of California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq. Said annexation into LMD No. 1992-01 shall be fully completed in accordance with California law prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the project.

15. Developer and/or property owner agrees to approve the incorporation of the project into the Street Lighting District No. SLD 1981-01 pursuant to the provisions of California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq. Said annexation into SLD No. 1981-01 shall be fully completed in accordance with California law prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the project.

16. Condition
No. 17
added by
Planning
Commission
7-12-22
Developer and/or property owner agrees that the City may, at its sole election, require that, instead of annexing into SLD 1981-01 and/or LMD 1992-1, the project shall be incorporated into a Community Facilities District to be created by the City pursuant to the provision of California Government Code Section 53311, et seq; the purpose of which, and the initial amount of the taxes and assessments thereunder, will be substantially the same, in whole or in part, as SLD 1981-1 and/or LMD 1992-1.

Developer and/or property owner agrees to approve the incorporation of the project into said Community Facilities District, provided that the incorporation of the new CFD does not otherwise delay the development of the project; in which event the project shall instead be annexed into SLD 1981-01 and/or LMD 1992-1. Any automatic fee increases for the Community Services District shall not be inconsistent with the approved rate study.

17. Applicant and/or developer shall provide dust control and soil tracking measures during construction and if vehicles are accessing the site.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - BUILDING DIVISON

18. The parcel maps shall be prepared, sealed, and signed by a California licensed land surveyor or a California licensed civil engineer who had been licensed prior to January 1980.

Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

19. Complete orientation of the proposed line between the two parcels shall be addressed on the Tentative Parcel Map No. 2022-126.

20. The parcels map after being approved by the City shall be recorded by the Orange County Recording Office.

21. All improvement and grading plans shall be drawn on twenty-four (24) inches by thirty- six (36) inch Mylar and signed by a registered civil engineer or other registered/licensed professional as required.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT — ENGINEERING DIVISION

22. The following items are required for the entitlement review:
a. Preliminary grading and drainage plan.
b. Preliminary geotechnical report.
c. Preliminary hydrology/drainage study.
d. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in the form and content per the City's WQMP template.
e. Sewer capacity study.

23. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all existing and new utilities including electric power, telephone, telecommunication fiber and/or cable TV in the street adjacent to and on-site shall be placed underground in accordance with the City of Placentia standards and ordinances.

24. It is the applicant's responsibility to notify all utility companies and the City of Placentia for disconnection and/or relocation of the existing utilities, vaults and meters. It is also the applicant's responsibility to ensure applicant notifies the Building Inspection Division that these utilities have been properly relocated and/or disconnected. Prior to recordation of the final map, the public improvement plans as required shall be prepared and signed by the City Engineer.

25. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the engineer of record shall submit all approved project and site improvements plans on an AutoCAD DWG and DFX formatted Compact Disc (CD) to the Public Works Department. The applicant shall pay for and provide the City with copies of as -built plans.

26. Recent title report to clarify the ownership and all easements on the property.

27. Provide an erosion control, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) for protection of the site during and post excavation activities.

Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

GRADING

28. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare a Low Impact Development (LID) specifically identifying the Best Management Practices (BMP's) that will be used on site to control predictable pollutant runoff. The plan shall identify the types of structural and/or non-structural measures to be used. The plan shall comply with the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and LID Implementation Guideline. Website available at
( http://ocwatersheds.com/publiced/residents/glltd) Particular attention should be addressed to the appendix section "Best Management Practices for priority redevelopment." The LID shall clearly show the locations of structural or Nonstructural BMP's, and assignment of long-term maintenance responsibilities. The plan shall be prepared to the general form and content and submitted to the Director of Public Works/City Engineer for review and approval.

29. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) specifically identifying the Best Management Practices (BMP's) that will be used on site to control predictable pollutant runoff. The plan shall identify the types of structural and non-structural measures to be used. The plan shall comply with the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). Particular attention should be addressed to the appendix section "Best Management Practices for Development." The WQMP shall clearly show the locations of structural BMP's, and assignment of long-term maintenance responsibilities (which shall also be included in the Maintenance Agreement). The plan shall be prepared to the general form and content shown in the City of Placentia's WQMP Template and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. Website available at ( http://www.placentia.org/index.aspx?nid=262)

30. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall demonstrate to the City Engineer that coverage has been obtained under the California's General Permit for Discharge of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number to the City Engineer. Construction activity subject to this permit includes clearing, grading and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling, or excavation. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for review a Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the approved SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and available for review upon request.

31. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare and submit a precise grading plan prepared by a licensed civil engineer to the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department showing building footprints, new and revised pads and elevations of finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements, structural best management practices (BMPs) conforming to the approved water quality management plan, and other pertinent information. The Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

project development shall accept and make provisions for the existing surface water that are the natural flows from the adjacent properties immediately abutting to the development site.

32. Prior to approval of the final design plans and issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall conduct a site-specific geotechnical investigation for the entire site and prepare a report that fully assesses the geologic and soil conditions of the site. As part of the report preparation, soil sampling and any geotechnical testing will be completed at each location where structures are to be erected. The report shall provide grading and structural design recommendations for avoiding liquefaction, subsidence or collapse for each of the proposed structures. The recommendations shall be implemented by the Applicant.

33. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Division of Public Works Department.

34.AII private slopes of 4 feet or more in vertical height and of 4:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.

35. The development site shall be graded to drain surface water to the existing City storm drain system with no cross -lot drainage permitted. Drainage shall be indicated on the precise grading plans.

36. Surety and agreement guaranteeing completion of all on-site grading improvements including drainage, structural BMPs, erosion control, grading operations shall be posted and executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits.

37. The final grading plan for this parcel shall be substantially the same, specifically regarding pad elevations, size, and configuration as the proposed grading illustrated on the approved site plan. If there is a significant deviation between the two plans the Community Development Director and the City Engineer will review the plans and determine if a finding of substantial conformance can be made prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The Development Services Director and the City Engineer may refer the matter to the Planning Commission for an opinion before deciding.

38.AII parking, common, and storage areas shall be lighted to maintain a minimum of 1 - foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and be on photo censored cell.

39. The site grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with each other and for consistency with the requirements and standards of the City of Placentia.

Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

40. The applicant shall provide a quitclaim or relocation of existing easements as applicable in the plan review process prior to issuance of grading permit.

41. Provide and identify all pavement and driveway paving materials used inside and outside of the development areas. Identify all storm drain structures, types, sizes, and specifications on the plans.

42. Preliminary WQMP shall include a feasibility check to ensure the proposed infiltration BMPs are not proposed to be within 100 feet horizontally of a water supply well and/or non -potable well for the protection of groundwater quality per Orange County TGD.

Golden State Water Company currently operates a water well pump at the northwest corner of Bradford Avenue and Crowther Avenue.

Public Improvements and Construction

43. Applicant shall be responsible for reconstruction of the existing pavement within the limits of the project. The applicant shall provide street resurfacing using grind to a depth of 2 -inch and 2 -inch overlay. Applicant may also be responsible for reconstruction of the driveway approaches, sidewalks, curb and gutters, streetlights, and street trees as determined by the City Engineer. The limit of the paving shall include full width of the street along the entire property frontage.

All public improvements shown on the plans and the map shall be constructed to the City of Placentia's standards, ordinances, policies

44. Prior to issuance of 1st occupancy permit, all new public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, asphalt concrete pavement, and streetlights within property boundaries shall be constructed satisfactorily to the City Engineer.

45. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending beyond the project boundaries a minimum distance of 150 feet at a grade and alignment approved by the City Engineer.

46.AII ADA improvements constructed within the public right of way must meet the latest ADA and CBC standards and will require CASp inspection during construction and be certified by the CASp inspector. All CASp inspection and related activities shall be provided and paid for by the applicant and the developer.

47. Prior to recordation of final map or issuance of building permit if recordation has already been accomplished, the applicant shall enter into an agreement and post security bond, in a form and amount acceptable to the City Engineer, guaranteeing the construction of public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards and the City Code, including, but not limited to the following:

48. Street improvement including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, driveway approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems and other traffic control devices as appropriate.

Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

a. Storm drain facilities
b. Landscaping
c. Sewer systems
d. Street lighting
Storm Drain Improvements and Construction

49. The project street and lot grading shall be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area and outlet points. Unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director.

50. Drainage easements, when required, shall be shown on the grading plans, and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no buildings, obstructions, or encroachments by landfills are allowed."

51. The project shall be designed to accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. The storm drain design and improvements shall be subject to review and approval by City Engineer. The hydraulics and hydrology report shall include detailed drainage studies indicating how the grading, in conjunction with the drainage conveyance systems including applicable swales, channels, street flows, catch basins, storm drains, and flood water retarding, BMP treatment and LID, will allow building pads to be safe from inundation from rainfall runoff which may be expected from all storms up to and including the theoretical 100 -year flood per the Orange County Hydrology Manual. The project development shall be designed to accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. If the quantities exceed the existing downstream capacity, the developer shall provide adequate drainage facilities to mitigate the impact as approved by the City Engineer.

52. Prior to the approval of the improvement plans, the hydrology study shall show that the 25 -year storm flow will be contained within the street from curb to curb and the 100 -year storm flow shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, additional drainage facilities shall be installed. All analysis shall comply with the Orange County Hydrology Manual and County Local Drainage Manual.

53. The post development peak flow rate generated from the project site shall be less than or equal to the predevelopment peak flow rate from the site for all frequency storms up to and including 100 -year return.

54. Drainage facilities with sump conditions shall be designed to convey the tributary 100 - year storm flows. Secondary emergency flow bypass shall also be provided as approved by City Engineer.

Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

Sewer line Improvements and Construction

55. Sewer flow calculations justifying pipeline design and connection to the main shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted as a part of an improvement plan for approval by the City Engineer. Provide sewer capacity analysis in accordance with the City's Guidelines to evaluate the proposed sewer flow rates into the City sewer system using current flow rate and for pipeline capacity availability. Please see attached "Sewer Capacity Guidelines."

56. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer's engineer shall analyze and mitigate any sewer system deficiencies for all phases of the proposed development.

Results of the system analysis may require special construction such as booster pumps, upsize the downstream pipes and backwater valves. The engineering analysis and special construction requirements shall be subject to review and approval of City Engineer.

57.Onsite water improvement and fire protection plans shall be approved by the Fire Marshal, the local water district, and City Engineer. The water distribution lines and appurtenances shall conform to the applicable laws and adopted regulations enforced by the Golden State Water Company.

58. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall dedicate ingress and egress of the access route within the project site and improve it fully operational as required by the Orange County Fire Authority and satisfaction to the City Engineer.

59. The applicant shall submit a Will Serve Letter from Orange County Sanitation District and Golden State Water Company.

60. Installation of new sanitary sewer manholes may be required at the discretion of the City Engineer and OCSC. All sanitary sewer improvements shall be in accordance with the latest OC Public Works Department Standards.

Traffic

61. Provide new and modify the existing striping modifications within the limits of the new paving and the project.

Final Map

62. Applicant shall provide a quitclaim or relocation of any existing easements that affect the proposed development.

63. The applicant shall prepare and submit a preliminary title report not older than 90 days.

64. Prior to approval of the Final Map, pursuant to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Public Improvements, the developer shall provide security in an amount Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

specified in writing by the Registered Civil Engineer or a Licensed Land Surveyor of record. The developer shall enter into an agreement for providing the necessary right- of-way design and construction of missing public improvements, which shall be constructed in coordination with adjacent existing improvements prior to occupancy of the development and subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.

65. Prior to the exoneration of any security, the applicant shall submit one (1) duplicate Mylar of the final map and all as built public improvement plans, in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer.

66. This project falls under the City's Municipal Code: 8.04.390 Special requirements for construction/deconstruction waste. This is to ensure the diversion of at least fifty (50) percent of all construction/deconstruction waste generated within the city the following special requirements apply to all covered projects as listed in Section 8.04.400:
a) All contractors or owner -builders applying for a permit are required to complete a project form and attest that only an authorized city agent will be used to haul debris and other solid waste generated by that project. b) All contractors or owner -builders are required to place a deposit with the city to ensure their compliance with the required use of an authorized city agent.

The specific deposit amount shall be an equivalent to One (1.00) percent of the total project value.
c) Upon completion of the project, and if proof deemed satisfactory by the city confirms that all solid waste hauling for that project was done by an authorized city agent then a full refund of the deposit will be made.

Acceptable forms of proof are weight tickets, collection receipts, billings, or similar statements from an authorized city agent showing that they performed solid waste collection at the location established for that project.

It is the contractor's or owner -builders' responsibility to provide receipts covering all hauling activity for that project. Failure to provide complete records will be deemed as noncompliance.
d) Failure to provide receipts or other acceptable proof of compliance for all solid waste hauling on a project will result in the forfeiture of one hundred (100) percent of deposited funds. (0-2011-08 § 2, 2011) Resolution R-2022-58

ATTACHMENT A

SCALE : 1" = 20'
0 UTILITY PURVEYORS:

WATER: GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
1920 W. CORPORATE WAY
ANAHEIM, CA. 92801
SEWER: CITY OF PLACENTIA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
401 E. CHAPMAN AVENUE
PLACENTIA, CA. 92870
GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.
1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD., SUITE G
ANAHEIM, CA. 92830
ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
1851 W. VALENCIA DRIVE
FULLERTON, CA. 92833
TRASH: REPUBLIC DISPOSAL SERVICES
1131 N. BLUE GUM STREET
TELEPHONE: AT&T
3939 E. CORONADO ST., SECOND FLOOR
ANAHEIM, CA. 92807
CABLE TV: TIME—WARNER
R/W
10'
▪ 4' 17
EXIST.)

SIDEWALK
CF
30'
PAD=247.0
1 20'
S —
w—
s
w
• O
LS
0 TC
FL
FS
FG
FF
GF
INV.

TG
CF
R/W
P
60'
20 40
LEGEND
—
rilaErr

PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION

PROPOSED LOT NUMBER

EXISTING SEWER MAIN

EXISTING WATER MAIN

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

PROPOSED SEWER MAIN

PROPOSED WATER MAIN

PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT

PROPOSED GRATE INLET

PROPOSED PVC DRAIN

LANDSCAPE AREA

PROPOSED PARKING STALL

PROPOSED WATER METER

PROPOSED BLOCK WALL

EXISTING BLOCK WALL

PROPOSED WATER VALVE

TOP OF CURB

FLOW LINE

FINISH SURFACE

FINISH GRADE

FINISH FLOOR

GARAGE FLOOR
INVERT

TOP OF GRATE

CURB FACE

RIGHT OF WAY

PLAN TER
30'
20' CF
EXIST.

PAVEMENT
EXIST.

CURB & GUTTER
EXIST.

CURB & GUTTER

TYPICAL SECTION

SITE ADD
TIDLAND CI '\ CLE
9 10'
ESS: 412 N. TIDLAND CI 1' CLE
4'
GE
11,1H21
R/W
1•0-
EXIST. SIDEWALK

TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP No. 2022=126

IN THE CITY OF PLACENTIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STAT F., OF CALIFORNIA,
EING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT NO. 227F F TRACT NO.14161, AS PER MAP ' ECORDEH IN BOOK 673, ]PAGES 37-48 INCLUSIVE MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE O]F]FICE OF THE

COUNTY ECORDER, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO
t
2 LOTS
SU
It

0.36 AC ES (NET & G
DIVIDER:

REALM California, LLC
1746 F South Victoria Avenue, #245
VENTURA, CA 93003
Contact: Blain Meith 985..630..9165
[email protected]

TIDLAND CIRCLE
60'
30'
EX. WATER MAIN
EX. SEWER MAIN
30'
m
co
cV
N00'31'34"E
O N
r J
II
J
'00.
cs -LA
cc
1C1311

OSS) MA

PREPARED
CH 2022
Y:

KING CIVIL ENGINEERING CORP
26702 VALPARISO DRIVE
MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691
Contact: Tom King 714..996..7010
[email protected]
N89'28'26'W 100.00'
121 1 B
8,273 S.F.

97.53'
C

43.1'
EX. OIL WELL

TO BE ABANDONED
2 7,537 S.F.
0 0
cfl
0 r`)
N)
0 0
z
3148
132
13:
0 W
BUENA VISTA AVE.
0 1-
z Ivt
▪ c[7D▪ L
.;
- p
z
H
SITE
E Cisneros Ln.

VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.

D
z
CD
Zl
m
z
NOTES:

1. Proposed Use: Single Family Residential

2. Development of Lot: — Fully Developed Lots.

3. All Existing Structures On Site To Be Demolished.

4. Flood Zone "X".

5. Assessor's Parcel No. 341-433-34

6. Subdivider intends to comply with all requirements in Chapters 20.20,22.16 through 22.64 and other laws of the City in regards to construction and erosion control.

OCFA NOTES:

1. All fire lane signs or red curb areas shall be shown on a site plan approved by the OCFA.

2. All structures will be protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.

I, THOMAS A. KING, DEPOSE AND STATE THAT THE OWNERS

OF THIS PROPERTY COMPRISING THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
NO. 2022-126 SHOWN ON THIS MAP, HAVE CONSENTED TO THE
PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF THIS MAP.

THOMAS A. KING R.C.E. NO. 16916
DATED THIS 23 DAY OF MARCH 2022
QRfFESSI0N\
No. 16916
Exp. 6/30/2023
SHEET 1 OF 1

ATTACHMENT 2. VICINITY ZONING MAP
TPM 2022-126; 412 N. Tidland Circle
Aerial B.

Zoning Code
- c-1
- C-1 (0)
- C-1 (0-1)
C-2
I
I
I
C -2-H65
C -M
C-0
MI M
I
I
I
I
1 M (0)

M (PMD)
PUD -1
PUD -2
PUD -2 (0)
- PUD -3
- PUD -3 (0)
- PUD -4
R-1
R-1 (MHP)
R-1 (0) - Old Town
R-2 I J TOD
R-2 (MHP) I N/A
I
I
I
I
j
1 R-3
R-3 (0-1)
R -A
R -G
R -G (0)
R -G(0) & C-1 (0)
- RPC (0)
SP -1
SP -2
SP -3
- SP -4
- SP -5
- SP -6 (0)
- SP -7
- SP -8
- SP -9
- SP -10
-T--C
I

Placentia City Council

AGENDA REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
VIA: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DEPUTY CITY ADMINISTRATOR / PUBLIC SERVICES & INFRASTRUCTURE DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2022
SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: PROPOSED PLACENTIA PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER

FINANCING OPTIONS
FISCAL
IMPACT: EXPENSE: $10.9 to $20.8 MILLION DEPENDING ON SELECTED FINANCING

STRUCTURE
REVENUE: LEASE REVENUE BONDS TO FUND PROJECT
COSTS
SUMMARY:

On March 1, 2022, the City Council selected a preferred project alternative for the proposed Placentia Public Safety Center and directed Staff to complete the architectural and engineering design for the project. The City Council also directed Staff to return with a proposed financing structure to pay for the project, currently estimated at $11.4 million. Staff has identified three (3) potential financing structures for the City Council's consideration. All three options involve bond financing for a portion of or the entire project cost. Staff recommends the City Council select Option 1 as it provides for the largest Tong -term General Fund cost savings to the City. Should the City Council elect to move forward with the project, Staff will assemble a Bond Financing Team to structure a lease revenue bond and will return to the City Council in the near future with the bond documents for its consideration and approval to authorize a bond sale.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Receive and file the presentation; and

2. Select Option 1 as the preferred financing structure option; and

3. Direct Staff to assemble a Bond Financing Team to structure Lease Revenue Bonds to finance a portion or entire project cost; and

4. Direct Staff to return to the City Council with bond documents to authorize the bond sale.

3.a.

Sept. 6, 2022

City Council Agenda
September 6, 2022

Page 2 ends

DISCUSSION:

On March 1, 2022, the City Council received a presentation on the 35% complete preliminary design of the proposed Placentia Public Safety Center. The City Council selected a final preferred project that entails the construction of a two-story, 18,805 square foot building with a ground -level indoor shooting range and an engineered prefabricated Butler Building to house property and evidence collected by the Placentia Police Department. In addition, a new emergency communications center will be constructed on the second floor of the building. The building will also include a training/conference center, staff office space and outdoor storage units for City departments. The current construction cost for the project is estimated to be $11,417,165.

Following the City Council's selection of the preferred project, Staff began working with the project architect to complete construction plans and bid documents for the project. The City Council also directed Staff to return at a later date with a proposed project financing structure for the City Council's consideration. Staff has identified three (3) potential financing structures for the City Council's consideration. Two of the options include a combination of reserve funds, capital project funds and property sales to provide a down payment towards the cost of the project while issuing lease revenue bonds to cover the balance of the project cost. The third option entails bond financing for the entire amount of the project.

Option 1
Source of Funds
Unrestricted Fund Balance Reserves
Delay City Hall/PD HVAC Project FY 23-24
(CIP Fund)
Property Sales
Grand Total Down Payment
Grand Total Bond Amount
Option 2
Total
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$550,000
$5,550,000
$5,900,000
Source of Funds Total
Unrestricted Fund Balance Reserves $3,000,000
Property Sales $550,000
Grand Total Down Payment $3,550,000
Grand Total Bond Amount $7,850,000
Option 3
Source of Funds
Bond for Full Project Amount
Total
$11,417,165

City Council Agenda
September 6, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total cost to finance a portion of or the total project amount depends on the financing structure selected which ranges from $10.4 million to $20.8 million as noted in the table below:

Estimated Estimated Total
Construction Estimated Total Bond Average Principal
Option Fund Costs of Issue Annual Debt and Interest
Issuance Proceeds Service (30 years)
1 $5,900,000 $325,000 $6,223,000 $360,000 $10,945,750
2 $7,850,000 $365,000 $8,214,000 $475,000 $14,440,750
3 $11,400,000 $435,000 $11,834,000 $685,000 $20,807,250 Prepared by:

Luis Esteve
Deputy Ci Administrator
Reviewed and ap
Damien R. Arrula
City Administrator
Attachment:

Presentation
Reviewed and approved:

Jenn er Lampman
Director of Finance

•

PLACENTIA
Rich Heritage, Bright Future
Placentia Public Safety Facility
Project Funding Review
September 6, 2022

Project Timeline
• April 6, 2021: City Council selects preferred project alternative and directs staff to complete engineering design services up to the 35% complete level
• July 20, 2021: City Council awards a professional services agreement to PBK Architects to design the project
• March 1, 2022: City Council reviews 35% engineering design, selects final project package, and directs staff to complete design
• September 6, 2022: City Council presented with project funding package and schedule for consideration

I City Council Approved
Project

L
City Council Approved Project
Staff Offices
071
Emergency
Comm Center
totem-
;
Second Floor
25 Yard Shooting Range
•
= Training:Cont
• CentererenCe
Vr:1 zr.

WOW •PaliWil
1421.1
MOW.

ProPettY &
Elelence,_ Storage
21 I .0
BOMMIN
I
NAM .11.3
aomcce.
10 I IP
11COMMIln

PROMPAINI
MOW..

I MI IR MT
Ks. 011.10.1
retarl.M1
IP
NOWle
4,340 SF CMU First Floor
6,620 SF CMU Second Floor
5,265 SF Butler Building
2,560 SF CMU Gun Range
18,805 SF Total
Construction Cost Estimate:
$11,417,165

Future Market Rate Lease Costs
Fiscal Year
Annual Lease Payments
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
$486,552
$506,014
$526,255
$547,305
$569,197
2028 $591,965
2029
$615,643
2030 $640,269
2031
2032
2033-2050
Total
$665,880
$692,515
$18,470,232
$24,311,827
Lease costs based on current market rate value of $1.90/SF for the City's current leased facility and 4% annual escalator.

Proposed Project Financing Structure
Option 1
Source of Funds
Unrestricted Fund Balance Reserves
Delay City HaII/PD HVAC Project to FY 23-24
(CIP Fund)
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
Property Sales
$550,000
Grand Total Down Payment
$5,550,000
Grand Total Bond Amount
$5,900,000
Option 2
Source of Funds
Unrestricted Fund Balance Reserves
$3,000,000
Property Sales
$550,000
Grand Total Down Payment
$3,550,000
Grand Total Bond Amount
$7,850,000

Proposed Project Financing
Structure, Cont.

Option 3
Source of Funds
Bond for Full Project Amount
$11,400,000

PLACENTIA

Financing Assumptions
• Tax exempt Lease Revenue Bonds (public use facility)
• LRB tax exempt rates est. —4.2%* for a projected 30 -year amortization
• City assets leased to Placentia Public Financing Authority; PFA leases assets to City
• PFA issues bonds backed by City lease payments
• Upon completion of construction and occupancy, City assets released and replaced by the new Public Safety Facility. *Estimates only; subject to final bond structure and market rates at time of bond sale.

Financing Cost Summary
Option
Construction Fund
Estimated
Costs of
Issuance
Estimated
Total Bond Issue
Proceeds
Estimated
Average
Annual Debt
Servi
Total
Principal and
Interest (30
year
1 $5,900,000
$325,000
$6,223,000
$360,000 $10,945,750
2 $7,850,000 $365,000
$8,214,000 $475,000 $14,440,750
3 $11,400,000 $435,000 $11,834,000 $685,000 $20,807,250 Staff recommends:
• Allocating 50% of Public Safety Development Impact Fees received in a fiscal year towards the annual debt service payment.
• Allocating 50% of any negotiated, developer fees received in a fiscal year towards the annual debt service payment.

Impacts to Reserve Levels
Option 1- $3M
FY22/23 Reserve
Adopted Budget Contribution
Reserve
goal -
25%
34%
Option 2- $2M
Reserve
Contribution
Option 3- No
Reserve
Contribution
40%

Grant Funding Received for
Project
quipment Purchase
Spacesaver Controloc Evidence Locker
System
Pass-Thru Refrigerated Evidence Locker
Indoor Walk-in Cooler
Evidence Processing Table
Total
Amount
$86,000
$24,000
$14,000
$10,000
$134,000
All items purchased with Prop 69 Funding.

PLACENTIA

Construction and Transition
Schedule
0 Construction Documents
May 18, 2022 Oct 5, 2022 20.0 weeks
F Prepare Construction Document Drawings
10 Complete Project S _ _ _ .
11 Fre D _ .. /City Review csf 50916 CDs
12 Final Costs Estimate Update
May 11, 2022
Jul d, 2022
Jul 13, 2022
Aug 24.. 2022
Aug 31, 2022
Aug 31, 2022
Jul 27, 2022
Aug 31, 2022
1 S_0 weeks Construation Document Drawings
S.0 weeks Project McinuelfS,. - ..

2.0 weeks E.0 Construction C —

1.0 weeks Construction Documents Cost Estimate
13 Buidirrg Department/Engineering Submittal & Review I Aug 31.. 2022 Oct S. 2022 5.0 weeks 11004ti Conshuction Document Drawings 11 Bidding and Negotiations
-Oct 5, 2022
Nov 2, 2022 4,0 weeks
15 Advertise to Bid
16 Repond to Bid RP's/Prepare Addenda
17 Bid Opening
1$ Review Bids
19 Council Award of Bid
Oct 3, 2022
Oct 5, 2022
Nov 2, 2022
Nov 2, 2022
Nov 15, 2022
Oct 3, 2022 0.0
Oct 26..099 3.0 weeks
Nov 2, 2022 0.0
Nov 4, 2022 0.3
Nov 15, 2022 0.0
20 Construction
Nov 16, 2022
Mar 10, 2024 68.6 weeks
21 Job Site Me-etings
22 Subrnittals and Shop Drawings
23 Punch List
24 Final C. _ l 'Move -In
Nov 17, 2022
Nov 21, 2022
Jan 25, 2024
Feb 23, 2024
Jon 25, 2024
Jan 30, 2023
Feb 22, 2024
filar d, 2024

62.0 10.0

4.0 2.0
weeks
weeks
'.weeks
weeks
Meeting Minutes
Reviewed Submittal & Shop Drawings
Punch List
25 Project Complete
Mar 10, 2024

Recommended Actions

1. Receive and file the presentation

2. Select a preferred Financing Structure
Staff recommends Option 1

3. Direct Staff to assemble a Bond Financing Team to
structure Lease Revenue Bonds to finance a portion
of the project cost

4. Direct Staff to return to the City Council with bond documents to authorize the bond sale
•
13 PLACENTIA
All

Next Steps & Timeline
September 6, 2022: City Council review and consideration of financing package and policy direction to staff
September 2022: City Administrator retains financial advisor, bond and disclosure counsel, and bond underwriter
September 20, 2022: City Council considers purchasing contracts for Butler Building and shooting range systems
October 4, 2022: City Council considers and approves bond documents and resolutions and directs staff to proceed with bond sale October 5, 2022: Staff solicits bids for construction of facility November 10, 2022: Bonds are sold
November 15, 2022: City Council considers and awards construction contract
December 2022 — December 2023: Construction period
January 2024 — March 2024: Move-in/occupy

PLACENTIA
All

Questions?

PLACENTIA
Rich Heritage, Bright Future

← All documents from this meeting