development efforts to spur development and infrastructure improvement on major transportation corridors, such as the future Chapman Avenue corridor. • Goal LU -10 states: Create enhanced connectivity with California State University Fullerton (CSUF) campus community. Policy LU -10.2 furthers this goal by stating: In creating the aforementioned corridor plans, the City shall take into consideration the nearby Cal State University Fullerton campus community and capitalize on its proximity.
In October 2022, City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Placeworks to draft the Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan document and supporting environmental documentation furthering the aforementioned goals of the General Plan. Since that time, Staff has been working closely with Placeworks to refine the plan, and at this time, Staff is seeking City Council input.
DISCUSSION:
The Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan development standards and regulations will foster responsible, progressive and attractive development to meet City Council's goals for the corridor.
Medium-high density mixed-use development will bring new businesses and residents to the Chapman Corridor, and adjacent Old Town Placentia and TOD District, benefitting the traditional downtown with new shoppers and diners.
Another benefit of the Revitalization Plan is to plan for appropriate successor commercial and mixed-use development that will unify the Chapman Corridor from Placentia Avenue to Kraemer Boulevard. Staff envisions that the plan will encourage the consolidation of smaller parcels for new development, providing a catalyst for development, thereby increasing pedestrian activity and revenue to the City in the form of property taxes, sales tax, Transient Occupancy tax and impact fees. This will also result in a more unified aesthetic for the Chapman Corridor, which currently appears aesthetically and visually inconsistent between Placentia Avenue and Kraemer Boulevard.
Placeworks (with Staff oversight) prepared a presentation (Attachment 1) for City Council review.
The presentation will summarize the project overview, corridor boundary options, and existing conditions (including land use, urban design, mobility, opportunity areas, mobility considerations, policy guidance/questions, and next steps. There are three different slides throughput the presentation, each with specific policy questions. The goal of this Study Session is to receive City Council and public input regarding the following policy questions:
The first set of policy questions are related to the corridor boundaries. Those questions are:
1. Which properties should be included within the project boundary?, 2. Could overlays be appropriate to incorporate properties that fall within Old Town and contribute to Chapman Corridor?, and 3. Should the Civic Center be considered for inclusion and possible redevelopment or vertical public/private expansion?
City Council Agenda
February 7, 2023
The second set of policy questions are related to land use and site testing. Those questions are:
1. What does council envision for the future of Chapman Corridor?, 2. What are key objectives for Chapman Corridor?, and 3. What mobility options should be considered for Chapman Avenue and connections to Old Town and the future Metrolink Station? The third set of policy questions are related to additional uses and mobility (transportation). Those questions are: 1. What additional uses and or types of development should be explored?, and
2. Which mobility options and connections should this plan prioritize? Next Steps
February and March:
• Stakeholder and Property Owner Conversations
• Community Outreach
• Refine Plan Objectives
• March/April City Council Study Session #2 (if desired by City Council) • Continue to refine opportunity areas and site testing • Refine Mobility Recommendations — Fehr & Peers
April and May:
• Draft Plan
Summer 2023:
• Conduct an Economic Benefit Analysis (upon completion of land use changes and buildout) • Council approval of Corridor Revitalization Plan, initiate any necessary CEQA studies (final Plan adoption with CEQA certification)
Ongoing:
• Continue to refine opportunity areas and site testing • Refine Mobility Recommendations — Fehr & Peers
On A Parallel Track:
• Initiate a Chapman Corridor Streetscape Master Plan
Prepared by:
Reviewed and a
ved:
Josep La •ert D. + rrula
Director bf Development Services
Attachment:
PowerPoint Presentation
City Administrator
Chaps
Corrid
Revitc,
Plan
City Council
Study Session
02/07/2023
Agenda
• Project Overview
• Boundary Options
• Existing Conditions
• Land Use
• Urban Design
• Mobility
• Opportunity Areas
• Mobility Considerations
• Policy Guidance/ Questions
• Next Steps
Project Overview
• Kicked off in 2022 to explore options for entitlement and incentives for revitalization along the corridor
• Could result in updated zoning, an overlay, or a specific plan for the area
Mobility Identify and Additional Studies/
Analysis Prioritize Options CEQA
e 0 0 0 8
Existing Conditions Stakeholder,
/ Opportunities Property Owner,
and Constraints and Community
Outreach
Land Use Compatibility and Site Testing
Develop the Plan
A
Plan Adoption
Defining the Corridor:
Boundary Options
Boundary Option #1: City RFP (July 2022)
CHAP
57 AN AVE ,
i
r
1 1
�
LL -1
NSET DR
ALTA VISTA ST
ME�C0\ `N
7 •
••.
.F;
c a
I
I
I
I
•I
•
•
•
•
I
a
CENTER ST
•„r
up Lu
--
Z
Q
w
0 SANTA FE AVE
O 'i' PV E
C9
fff
c���; ,I�Yillll�liillligldri� .��II� 1111 lnnu n
*'' 1INt4101�� 111111 III f1 ld
♦♦
•
Placentia
1-NI-1111 11111 -- Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell NINI11111
1 1
Anaheim
Boundary Option #2: Placentia Ave to Kraemer Blvd
CHAPMAN AVE
•
,
o, a
.1)I8
4147
1 ,
I
I
1 1
,
I
1 ,
1 •
CENTER ST
W
Q Q
Q w Q
o Q
Q
SANTA FE AVE m
r
c„0\1,1-\\-oz'\\I
111
�
_•�°a
s`. �x�
„---
•
Placentia
•••1. ••1
Anaheim
Policy Questions
1. Which properties should be included within the project boundary?
2. Could overlays be appropriate to incorporate properties that fall within Old Town and contribute to Chapman
Corridor?
3. Should the Civic Center be considered for inclusion and possible redevelopment or vertical public/private
expansion?
Existing Conditions:
Land Use
Urban Design
Mobility
Existing Conditions
Opportunities
Existing Conditions
Assets
Existing Conditions: Land Use
„116. � 104
*a us w. . iu •
11111 .v Z. Z.
:=' Nur RAW 41110 ft=
111:
.0.411MIMM 11).11111
411"1"Im s= Mundt
1.1111111111m ,
nMIE mom
og& WIL" En Nom am 1111111
'+ •=== j gur
min
Cal State Fullerton
1 I �
�i�� 4_!I%/civ' m��ss
•
188Minium
XIQI��I% �vgimmnn it
�/�
Valencia HS
NUTWOOD AVE
Existing Land Uses
SCAG 2019
Single Family Residential
I Multi Family Residential
NM Commercial and Services
General Office
II Industrial
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Mobile Home and Trailer Parks
Open Space and Recreation
IF—I Religious Institution
I I Education
Vacant
Water
City Boundaries
--- Draft Chapman Corridor Study Area
Alta Vista County Club
ALTA VISTA ST
Kraemer Park
Kraemer MS
Civic Center
•
•
iNs as sr",
f
/
/
/
/
/
o �a
q,
/tea
°NORPEPv
ORPNIlliftwer goo 40,1 "Pr J,G
Tulin two
40 ant WI ail ii
.. fl • .
1111 a *4. • MPS
� %101111
1 i 1'.8 •.. • lIlIu.n. isb oar: a MVP.
Lik 10
• C • 111 ai •vnu lle a o
1. 1
newso 11N1j11•IIII11lintironus strialleal en
oyI
....■.
r—,===."
Old Town
Future Metrolink Station
Urban Design: Parcel Size
CHAPMAN AVE
i
1 Q
Q1
oI SUNSET
ALTA VISTA ST
ea� Ara -
await
oIa
SIU
I
Parcel Size
r
0- 0.5 Acres
0.5 - 1 Acres
1 - 5 Acres
> 5 Acres
City Boundaries
--- Draft Chapman Corridor Study Area
SANTA FE AVE
GRG\NiNER PA
Placentia
NoINi1
Anaheim
Urban Design: Parcels with Street Facing Facades
1 ;,SUNSET DR
MRG\)Y `N
c a CENTER ST
J , V
•
I
I
I
•••
1 •
•
I
I
1 ALTA VISTA ST
m
w
w
40,1
ara
SANTA FE AVE
c„0\1,1-\\-oz'\\I GR
Placentia
Urban Design: Community Structure and Branding
QI
Q
W •
1SU
CHAPMAN AVE
r l
(57)
E�OpY �N
M
Landmark
1r I
A LTA
Go
'' .. 4-:•Y
O ?
w
r111 t
O
a
Q
SANTA FE AVE m
Secondary
Gateway
Gateway <._••
•
O��NER PVE
Placentia
------1
Anaheim
Urban Design/Mobility: Curb Cuts and Corridor Access
CHAPMAN AVE
1 1
wI
SUNSET DR
1 1
1-
•
CELATE T •. !l._ r .?1'
QQ Q
10 Curb cut/ parking lot access S C
i Residential Driveways SANFE AVE m
ALTA VISTA ST
m
W
W
I
1 I
I
•
•
et:7*4 manna
504100
Placentia
• A •• • 1 N
Anaheim
Existing Conditions: Primary Mobility
Vehicles are the primary travel
mode
• 35 MPH west of Kraemer
• 40 MPH east of Kraemer
• On -street parking
allowed on south side of
Chapman between
Murray and Bradford
• Mostly 4 travel lanes with
additional turn lanes an
intermittent median
. ■
Plei
IE
Existing Chapman Avenue west of Bradford Avenue
1 alita t l P
111
Existing Chapman Avenue west of Placentia Avenue
0 0.i
r
MIL
MIL
41 4
Existing Conditions: Secondary Mobility
• Bus - several stops and routes along
Chapman, Placentia, Bradford & Kraemer
• Bike - Class 111 shared bike route signage
along Chapman
• Pedestrians - paved sidewalks and marked
crossings at intersections
Opportunities
and Constraints
Opportunity Areas
. 111111
In and Out
Vacant land
1. Potential for Affordable Housing
-r r , Opportunity to allow for residential to remain or commercial uses such as small office (i.e. reuse
6.4 of homes for law office, dentist, etc.
um
— —
` Mixed-use opportunity site
1. p
I
C
+ Commercial opportunity site
Housing opportunity site
91 Old Town - Existing Zoning
TOD - Existing Zoning
Civic Center opportunity site
Northgate Market
Possihle
hospitality use
Church, potential for housing
Future
Station Parkin
Future Metrolink Station
CITY OF!ANigHJEM
Policy Questions
• What does council envision for the future of Chapman
Corridor?
• What are key objectives for Chapman Corridor?
• What mobility options should be considered for Chapman Avenue and connections to Old Town and the future
Metrolink Station?
Land Use
Considerations
and Site Testing
Opportunity Site A
Existing Conditions
Single Family Residential
4114,
Br Y
Fankasy Burger 1 CO
J
1 J
Commercial
Services 1
Vacant Bldgs and Recycling Center
esidential
3 Parcels
2.06 acres
Commercial Services
Opportunity Site A
Concepts: New Hospitality Development (Small Scale Hotel) Building Footprint: 12,084 SF
Stories: 5
Rooms: 161
Parking Spaces: 194
Building Footprint: 20,110 5F
Stories:
Rooms: 160
Parking Spaces: 160
NMI MANE. Lli 211.1I,,. 1.1.i'Rm9M11
i i fMrti - .111.11:21.4A r•h l.€q h+ W .1:41F10.1.0
LQF 4Ml51r4o,,AAT
rbru f 1,hii ii
LVD 1111
W.I. FF . a DH WC.
Example site plan
Opportunity Site A
Precedent Imagery: New Hospitality Development (Small Scale Hotel)
Opportunity Site B
Existing Conditions
Placen a97.3
Chamber-
Residentia! .1
Vacant Lot 1
Vacant aldg
5uzik's Freeze
ChC7''+`` CTS Appliance
0•i
w.l 11�e a-4
:111
8 Parcels
1.62 acres
•
Vacant Bldg
Suzie's Freeze
-
J
PIacentia Chamber of Commerce i Vaoonl Lot
Opportunity Site B
Concepts
Concept A: Wrap
Building Footprint: 33,655 SF
Stories: 4
Units: 100
Du/Ac: 62
Parking Spaces: 233 (4 story structure)
Concept B: Townhome
Building Footprint: 33,655 SF
Stories: 3
Units: 26
Du/Ac: 16
Parking Spaces: 52 surface + 26 garage
Concept : 20-piex
Building Footprint: 26,160 SF
Stories: 3
Units: 40
Du/Ac: 25
Parking Spaces: 76 surface + 40 garage
Opportunity Site B
Precedent Imagery - Concept A: Wrap
Concept A: Wrap
Building Footprint: 33,655 SF
Stories: 4
Units: 100
Du/Ac: 62
Parking Spaces: 233 (4 story structure)
111111111111111111111111.1111V
Opportunity Site B
Precedent Imagery - Concept B: Townhomes
Concept B: Townhome
Building Footprint: 33,655 SF
Stories:
Units: 26
Du/Ac: 16
Parking Spaces: 52 surface + 26 garage
Opportunity Site B
Precedent Imagery - Concept C: 20-piex
Concept : 20-plex
Building Footprint: 26,10 SF
Stories:
Units: 40
Du/ a: 25
Parking Spaces: 76 surface + 40 garage
ITII1Z
uI iju uri 1
11 t u' ut'1
Catalytic Project
Angelina Development - Kraemer Land Company
ANGELINA
PLACENTIA 1 CALIFORNIA
KRAERD COMPANY 119128
313121
VIEW ON SOUTH KRAEMER BLVD. AFTER 1 A9.1
ANGELINA
AREN; PLACENTIA I CALIFORNIA
KRAEMER LAND COMPANY 1 19-128
DATE 33121
COVER SHEET I CS 1
,/,�1
URBAN
ARENA
Land Use and Development Options to
Explore
• 4 and 5 story mixed use
• Revitalized commercial retail centers
• New approaches to Civic Center development
• Reuse of homes for office (i.e. Orange, Pasadena, etc.)
4-5 Story Mixed Use
4-5 Story Mixed Use
Old Pasadena
Commercial / Retail
Commercial / Retail
12885
Rodeo 39,
Home Business Conversion
Mobility Options to Explore
Work with on -demand shuttles/micro-transit operators
• Mobility As A Service (MAAS)
• Electric Neighborhood Vehicle (NEV) Options
• Free Rides Around the Neighborhood (FRAN) on -demand vehicle fleet (similar to City of Anaheim's program)
Consider a shuttle or trolley
• Create a Placentia Old Town Circulator Route
• Potential links to Metrolink Station, CSUF, local schools, Hospital, Civic Uses Expand bike facilities
• Extend bike lanes on Chapman Avenue past Mission Way, through Old Town
• E -scooter, e -bike, and bike share program options
Identify mobility connections to Metrolink
• Opportunities to service Metrolink station and provide a centralized location for all transportation modes/options
• Provide additional services for first-mile/last-mile, deliveries, travel planning eLI
I0
Cal Stat a unit/
Fullerton
P
Ade
liLACEN1iA
Sc,
Fender Ave r
▪ Z
• A
{eek
Carta°"
Policy Questions
1. What additional uses and or types of development
should be explored?
2. Which mobility options and connections should this plan prioritize?
Next Steps
February and March:
• Stakeholder and Property Owner Conversations
• Community Outreach
• Refine Plan Objectives
• March/April City Council Study Session #2
April and May:
• Draft Plan
Summer 2023:
• Conduct an Economic Benefit Analysis (upon completion of land use changes and buildout)
• Council approval of Corridor Revitalization Plan, initiate any necessary CEQA studies (final Plan adoption with CEQA certification)
Ongoing:
• Continue to refine opportunity areas and site testing • Refine Mobility Recommendations - Fehr & Peers
On A Parallel Track:
• Initiate a Chapman Corridor Streetscape Master Plan