Agenda packet — Placentia City Council, April 18, 2023 (part 2 of 2)

DISCUSSION:

As part of the construction of the new Placentia Public Safety Center Project, new electrical services and equipment will be established and installed as part of the construction of the facility.

The existing SCE service cable serving the Corporte Yard Facility will have to be relocated to allow for construction of the building and the proposed easement will allow for the placement of a new cable in a new location for maintenance and operations purposes. SCE requires easements to be granted in their favor in order to place their facilities on private and public property.

The City Council previously approved a grant of easement to SCE for this purpose. However, during the Phase I construction process it was determined that SCE had placed their new electrical cable in the wrong location, requiring it to be moved to the correct location necessating a new easement document that reflects the correct location where the electrical cable will be placed. As a separate action, Staff will present a quitclaim of that previous easement to the City Council for its consideration and approval at a later date. The easement noted in the attached documents will provide SCE the legal authority to enter onto the City's property to maintain, repair and potentially replace its utility facilities if needed. The specific location of the new facilities are noted in the legal description of the easement which provides for a strip of land located on the same lot and illustrated on the attached Exhibit "A."
FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended actions.

Prepared by:

Masoud S
City Engir}r✓er
l(�
Reviewed and approved:

Darnten-RT rrbIa-��
City Administrator
Luis Estevez
Deputy City Administrator
Attachment:

Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison (APN # 344-102-09)

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON
An EDISON I,VTERN,177O.\ 1 L Company

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
2 INNOVATION WAY, 2nd FLOOR
POMONA, CA 91768
Attn: Title and Real Estate Services
SCE Doc. No.

GRANT OF

EASEMENT

DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX S NONE
VALUE AND CONSIDERATION LESS THAN S'In0.ill}1
SCE Company

SIG OF DECLARANT OR AGENT DETERMINING TAX FIRM NAME

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
D15FHIt:I StHVII,:t DREIER &LIIAL NO MAY SILL
Fullerton TD2007222
GVM Mi -2047-G1 AYFROVLIT. DAIE
APN 344-102-09

VEGETATION &
LAND

MANAGEMENT
SLS/BT 04/10/2023
CITY OF PLACENTIA, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), hereby grants to SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a corporation, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"), an easement and right of way to construct, use, maintain, operate, alter, add to, repair, replace, reconstruct, inspect and remove at any time and from time to time overhead and underground electrical supply systems and communication systems (hereinafter referred to as "systems"), consisting of poles, guys and anchors, crossarms, wires, underground conduits, cables, vaults, manholes, handholes, and including aboveground enclosures, markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for distributing electrical energy and for transmitting intelligence, data and/or communications (eg. through fiber optic cable), in, on, over, along and across that certain real property in the County of County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:

TWO STRIPS OF LAND LYING WITHIN THAT PORTION OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 5 OF GOLDEN STATE TRACT, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 4, PAGES 66 AND 67 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, SAID PORTION IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN EXHIBIT "A" OF FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION NO. 29-73-53, RECORDED ON AUGUST 19, 1980 IN BOOK 13707, PAGE 1699, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BOTH IN

THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, THE CENTERLINES OF SAID STRIPS ARE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

STRIP #1 (4.00 FEET WIDE) (OVERHEAD SYSTEMS)
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2, SAID CORNER BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 5 WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CARBON CREEK CHANNEL, 60.00 FEET WIDE, AS SAID INTERSECTION IS DEPICTED ON RECORD OF SURVEY, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 247, PAGES 14 THROUGH 18 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID CARBON CREEK CHANNEL, NORTH 74°01'24" EAST 7.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A

TANGENT CURVE IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID CARBON CREEK CHANNEL, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1225.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°55'19" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 83.85 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE, SOUTH 19°54'16" EAST 11.52 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A" AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 83°43'29" EAST

18.00 FEET TO A POINT OF ENDING.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION INCLUDED WITHIN THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 2, MORE

PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, RECORDED ON MARCH 27, 1981 IN BOOK 13998, PAGE 676, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER.

STRIP #2 (6.00 FEET WIDE) (UNDERGROUND SYSTEMS)
BEGINNING AT SAID POINT "A"; THENCE NORTH 66°46'28" EAST 68.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°04'13" EAST 20.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°52'10" EAST 95.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 32°21'40" EAST 10.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°02'16" EAST 260.00 FEET TO A POINT OF ENDING.

THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP ARE TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED TO JOIN AT THE ANGLE POINTS.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION INCLUDED WITHIN SAID PORTION OF SAID LOT 2, MORE

PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, RECORDED ON MARCH 27, 1981 IN BOOK 13998, PAGE 676, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER.

FOR SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION, SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.

It is understood and agreed that the above description is approximate only, it being the intention of the Grantor(s) to grant an easement for said systems as constructed. The centerline of the easement shall be coincidental with the centerline of said systems as constructed in, on, over, under, across, and along the Grantor(s) property.

This legal description was prepared pursuant to Sec. 8730(c) of the Business & Professions Code.

Grantor further grants, bargains, sells and conveys unto the Grantee the right of assignment, in whole or in part, to others, without limitation, and the right to apportion or divide in whatever manner Grantee deems desirable, any one or more, or all, of the easements and rights, including but not limited to all rights of access and ingress and egress granted to the Grantee by this Grant of Easement.

Grantor agrees for himself, his heirs and assigns, not to erect, place or maintain, nor to permit the erection, placement or maintenance of any building, planter boxes, earth fill or other structures except walls and fences on the hereinbefore described easement area. The Grantee, and its contractors, agents and employees, shall have the right to trim or top such trees and to cut such roots as may endanger or interfere with said systems and shall have free access to said systems and every part thereof, at all times, for the purpose of exercising the rights herein granted; provided, however, that in making any excavation on said property of the Grantor, the Grantee shall make the same in such a manner as will cause the least injury to the surface of the ground around such excavation, and shall replace the earth so removed by it and restore the surface of the ground to as near the same condition as it was prior to such excavation as is practicable.
2 DSE
TD2007222

EXECUTED this day of , 20

GRANTOR
CITY OF PLACENTIA, a municipal corporation
Signature
Print Name
Title
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of
On
before me, , a Notary Public, personally
appeared , who proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
3 DSE
TD2007222

EXECUTED this day of 20 .

GRANTEE

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY,
a corporation
Signature
Print Name
Title
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. J State of California
County of
On
before me,
a Notary Public, personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to nie that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
4 DSE
TD2007222

LINE TABLE
LINE # BEARING LENGTH
L1 S19'54'16"E 11.52'
L2 N83'43'29"E 18.00'
L3 N66'46'28"E 68.49'
L4 N88'04' 13"E 20.73'
L5 N64'52'10"E 95.05'
L6 N32'21'40"E 10.08'
L7 N64'02'16"E 260.00'
L1
EXHIBIT "A"
L4; <D41)
lA
CCl-5\2.
/1225 06 -9‘6`'.6
PT. "A"/
TPOB STRIP #1
L4
L3 20gp-106
L 2 O O S �RVEq S
REOOR 5 � NGE c0.
fl�
L6
STRIP #2
L5 6' WIDE
(UG)
STRIP #1
4' WIDE
(OH)
W'LY LINE ��
OF BLK 5�
rl'ex'NN_R=35.00'
1-A 0=89'59'46"
% L=54.98'
'E, t
PCL. 1 tD-\ Z 4
P.M. 1138
ORANGE CO. \ tS,tt
I a '
\ cNs+�
\
%
t
0 ty
I0
\O
t �
t
L7

PER GRANT OF EASEMENT
TO SO. CAL. EDISON CO.

REC. 03/27/1981
BK. 13998 PG. 676, O.R.

ORANGE CO.

N+
A
POR. LOT 2 IN BLOCK 5 OF
GOLDEN STATE TRACT (M.M. 4/66-67)
DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN EXHIBIT "A"

PER FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION
NO. 29-73-53
REC. 08/19/1980 BK. 13707 PG. 1699, O.R.

ORANGE CO.
50 0 50
scale
1"= 50'
LEGEND
17,77.1 DENOTES OVERHEAD
CLC1u SCE EASEMENT AREA

DENOTES UNDERGROUND

SCE EASEMENT AREA
POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
TPOB = TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
100
feet

Placentia City Council
TO: CITY COUNCIL
VIA: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DATE: APRIL 18, 2023

AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: ANNUAL UPDATE REGARDING CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES,

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PACKINGHOUSE DISTRICT

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES, AND RESIDENTIAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING

IMPACT FEES FOR COST RECOVERY
FISCAL
IMPACT: These Development Impact Fees are established for cost recovery or statutory purposes only. There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with the recommended actions. The adoption of revised development impact fees and residential affordable housing impact fees will not have an immediate impact on revenues to the City until effective 60 days subsequent to adoption. This update adjusts most fees commensurate with the Construction Cost Index (CCI) and updates two specific fees commensurate with actual costs, and therefore, does not provide unanticipated revenue. The fees that are specifically being updated beyond CCI commensurate with actual costs are the Public Safety Impact Fee (now known as Fire, Police Animal Shelter fees) and TOD Sewer Impact Fee.

SUMMARY:

The City's Development Impact Fees program ("DIF") was first established in the early 1970's when much of the City was undeveloped. The City's costs for infrastructure have significantly increased over that period of time; however, the City's DIFs were not updated regularly to adequately cover said infrastructure costs, thus requiring the General Fund to subsidize infrastructure improvements or, in some cases, the improvements that are not conducted by a developer. In addition, in April 2017, the City Council approved the Transit -Oriented Development ("TOD") Packinghouse District Plan which will result in impacts to City services that the new development will create and identifies mitigation measures and costs associated with mitigating those impacts. Furthermore, since the inception of the DIF program, the City's Housing Element outlines numerous goals and policies, including goals and policies that provide more affordable housing opportunities to its residents.

In 2017, to address the aforementioned lack of infrastructure funding citywide, within the TOD District, and lack of funds related to implementing the required Housing Element citywide, the City prepared new development impact fee nexus studies ("Studies") for the purpose of updating DIFs.

The result was an update to the existing citywide DIF program, creating a TOD DIF program, and creating a Housing Impact Fee program (collectively, "DIFs"). The studies analyzed the impacts created by new development on City operations and infrastructure needs and calculated the cost

2.a.

April 18, 2023

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023
Page2of7
and method of apportionment of those fees and impacts across needed mitigation measures.

Those fees are then utilized to construct improvements throughout the City to mitigate development impacts on the community. The affordable housing fee was created for the purpose of collecting new developer -paid housing impact fees to be used to provide additional affordable housing opportunities in the community. Collectively, the DIF program that is currently in place was adopted by City Council in October 2017, implemented by Ordinance Nos. 0-2017-09 (TOD DIFs), 0-2017-10 (citywide DIFs), 0-2017-11 (Housing Impact Fee) and became effective in December 2017.

In 2022, City Council adopted an update to the DIF program, largely resulting in adjustments to the 2017 DIFs, increasing each fee by Construction Cost Index ("CCI") as recommended by the three (3) 2017 studies. This year, most of the proposed fees will be adjusted commensurate with the Construction Cost Index (CCI) by .23% consistent with how City Council previously codified the metrics for annual updates to the DIFs.

However, two specific fees are proposed to be updated commensurate with actual costs. The fees that are specifically being updated beyond CCI are the Public Safety Impact Fee (now known as Fire, Police Animal Shelter fees) and TOD Sewer Impact Fee. These specific fees can be updated beyond CCI because the City performed the "City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Nexus Study" dated April 2023 (attached).

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Open the Public Hearing concerning the Citywide Development Impact Fee Schedule, the Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) Packing House Development Impact Fee Schedule, and the Residential Affordable Housing Impact Fee Schedule; and

2. Receive the staff report, consider all public testimony, ask questions of Staff; and

3. Close the public hearing; and

4. Find that the recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(4), 15061(b)(3), and 15273 of the CEQA Guidelines, Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code, and the City of Placentia Local Guidelines for implementing CEQA; and

5. Adopt Resolution No. R-2023-20, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, approving updated Development Impact Fees pursuant to Construction Cost Index to financially mitigate impacts to parks and recreational facilities, sewer facilities, transportation infrastructure, storm drain facilities, Quimby in -lieu fees, and adopting public safety (Fire, Police, Animal Shelter) fees pursuant to the April 2023 Development Impact Fee Nexus Study; and

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 3 of 7 ends

6. Adopt Resolution No. R-2023-21, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, approving updated Development Impact Fees pursuant to Construction Cost Index to financially mitigate impacts to traffic and transportation infrastructure, and streetscape infrastructure in the Transit Oriented Development area, and adopting sewer facilities fees in the Transit Oriented Development area pursuant to the April 2023 Development Impact Fee Nexus Study; and

7. Adopt Resolution No. R-2023-22, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, approving updated Citywide Residential Affordable Housing Impact Fees pursuant to Construction Cost Index for residential developments citywide; and

8. Direct city staff to further evaluate and determine a metric that most closely reflects the current cost indices average for cost trends for specific construction trade labor and materials in the current construction environment; and

9. Direct city staff to prepare a new Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Report to be employed for the future update of both Citywide Development Impact Fees and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Impact Fees for fiscal year 2024-25.

STRATEGIC PLAN STATEMENT:

This item is consistent with the City Council approved 5 -Year Strategic Goal to:

Keep Development Impact Fees current and updated to facilitate cost recovery by requiring new development to pay a fair share of costs for City facilities, as Objective Number 1.3 is to Update Fee Study/Cost Allocation. In addition, this action is consistent with Objective Number 3.12 to secure funding for affordable housing as the Citywide Residential Affordable Housing Impact Fees will be increasing commensurate with CCI.

BACKGROUND:

DIFs are a commonly used method of collecting a proportional share of funds from new development for infrastructure improvements and/or other public facilities capital improvements that would be needed as a result of the new development. These fees are seen as paying for the aforementioned future required infrastructure costs as opposed to the General Fund and are therefore seen as cost recovery in nature. With rare exceptions, DIFs are one-time funds restricted to funding capital costs for new facilities or upgrades to existing facilities and are not used for annual operations and/or maintenance. Impact fees may only be imposed on new development, and the fee proceeds must be expended on improvements needed as a result of the new development.

Pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act ("Act"), California Government Code Section 66000, et seq. (also known as AB 1600), adoption of impact fees requires documentation of the "nexus" between the fees being charged, the impacts of new development, the benefit of the facilities needed to mitigate such impacts, and the proportional cost allocation among different fee categories. Impact fee programs must be adopted by the City Council via an ordinance, however, once the program

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 4 of 7 ends

is adopted, the fees could potentially be automatically updated via City Council resolution. Impact fees are imposed either jurisdiction -wide or in a relatively large area anticipating significant amounts of new development, such as a specific plan area or community plan area. In Placentia, we have both citywide (includes affordable housing) impact fees and TOD District specific impact fees.

In 2017, the City prepared development impact fee nexus studies for the purpose of updating DIFs pursuant to California Government Code Section 66000. Three different nexus studies were completed in 2017 and were utilized respectively to adopt the current citywide DIFs, the housing impact fee, and the TOD DIFs. The DIF program that is currently in place was adopted by City Council in October 2017, implemented by Ordinance Nos. 0-2017-09 (TOD DIFs), 0-2017-10 (Citywide DIFs), 0-2017-11 (Housing Impact Fee) and became effective in December 2017.

Although the 2017 DIF update was comprehensive in nature, the City did not update the DIFs between 2017 and 2020. The 2021 DIF update adjusted the fees commensurate with the CCI from December 2017 to February 2021. In updating the DIFs in 2021, City Council adopted an Ordinance codifying how annual updates to the DIFs will occur. The Municipal Code now states that the annual fee adjustment shall be based on April -to -April Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles as published by the Engineering News -Record for the preceding 12 months (April to April), with the exception of the 2022 fee update which shall be based on February 2021 to April 2022 Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles as published by the Engineering News -Record.

Therefore, this year's annual update is based on the CCI change from April 2022 to April 2023, and subsequent years will be based on April -to -April CCI change unless the Municipal Code is amended.

DISCUSSION:

Update to Development Impact Fees
The existing Citywide DIFs include the following:
• Citywide Public Safety Impact Fee Program
• Now known as Fire, Police Animal Shelter fees pursuant to the City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Nexus Study" dated April 2023
• Citywide Park and Recreation Impact Fee Program
• Citywide Quimby Land Dedication and In -Lieu Fee Program • Sewer Impact Fee Program
• Traffic Impact Fee Program

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 5 of 7 ends

• Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program
The existing residential Affordable Housing Impact Fee includes:
▪ A Residential Affordable Housing Impact Fee ("RAHIF") requiring developers to pay a fee to mitigate the additional demand for affordable housing that is created by proposed market rate residential development.

The existing TOD DIFs include the following:
• TOD Traffic Impact Fee
• TOD Sewer Impact Fee
• Now updated pursuant to the City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Nexus Study" dated April 2023
• TOD Streetscape Infrastructure Impact Fee
As previously stated, all three of the existing DIF programs included nexus studies to justify each respective DIF. Each of the three studies recommended that CCI be utilized as the metric for future DIF increases. The Municipal Code (adopted in 2017) specifically states that the Citywide and TOD DIFs be adjusted annually commensurate with changes in construction costs. The Residential Affordable Housing Impact Fee study recommended CCI as a metric to be utilized for annual adjustments. As previously stated, this method of recurring annual updates was codified in the Municipal Code in 2021. This year's update will largely adjust the fees commensurate with the CCI for Los Angeles as published by the Engineering News -Record from April 2022 to April 2023, effective 60 days after adoption, as follows:

Date CCI
April 2022 13698.12
April 2023
13729.03
The delta calculation between April 2023 CCI and April 2022 CCI is expressed as (13729.03 - 13698.12 = 30.91). 30.91 / 13729.03 = 0.0023, rounded to .23%. As such, Staff has prepared three resolutions to update the DIFs, one each for the existing Citywide DIFs, TOD DIFs, and for the residential Affordable Housing Impact Fee. Therefore, the rates for most DIFs have been increased by .23%. However, it is the observation of city staff that the recommended net increase in rates does not accurately reflect the current market bidding environment for its Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). Therefore, as an additional recommendation, city staff is requesting City Council to direct the Development Services Department to work in concert with finance staff in the preparation of a new Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Report to be employed for the future update of both Citywide Development Impact Fees and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Impact Fees for fiscal year 2024/2025.

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 6 of 7 ends

Public Safety and TOD Sewer
City Council previously directed Staff to begin a review of the Public Safety Impact Fee to update said fee in accordance with the operation and planning of the new Placentia Fire and Life Safety Department. The City worked with SCI Consulting Group to address this fee and to address the TOD Sewer Impact Fee to address unanticipated rising costs associated with sewer improvements in the TOD area. The fees that are specifically being updated beyond CCI are the Public Safety Impact Fee (now known as Fire, Police Animal Shelter fees) and TOD Sewer Impact Fee. These specific fees can be updated beyond CCI because the City performed the "City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Nexus Study" dated April 2023 (attached).

The proposed Public Safety Fees are now split into Fire, Police Animal Shelter fees and are increasing overall by approximately 35% on average (24%-38% depending on the land use category). The TOD Sewer Fees are increasing by approximately 51 % depending on the land use category. These increases are based upon the attached "City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Nexus Study" dated April 2023.

Other Updates
In 2021, the Storm Drain Acreage Fees for Area G in the southeast portion of the City were adjusted to a certain amount (not using CCI) due to a recent legal Settlement Agreement. Staff has been advised by the City Attorney to keep Storm Drain acreage fees for Area G at the same rate as adjusted and adopted in 2021 until the end of 2027. Development that occurs in Area G between the effective date of the 2021 update and December 31, 2027, will be subject to the adjusted fee adopted by City Council in 2021 pursuant to the settlement agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with the recommended actions. DIFs are a commonly used cost recovery method of collecting a proportional share of funds from new development for infrastructure improvements and/or other public facilities capital improvements that would be needed as a result of the new development. These fees are seen as paying for necessary infrastructure costs as opposed to the General Fund and are therefore seen as cost recovery in nature. The adoption of revised Development Impact Fees and Residential Affordable Housing Impact Fees will not have an immediate impact on revenues to the City until effective 60 days subsequent to adoption. This update essentially adjusts the fees commensurate with the Construction Cost Index (CCI), and therefore, does not provide unanticipated revenue, rather it adjusts revenue commensurate with CCI for the period between the 2021 effective date and present. The fees that are specifically being updated beyond CCI commensurate with actual costs are the Public Safety Impact Fee (now known as Fire, Police Animal Shelter fees) and TOD Sewer Impact Fee as justified by the attached "City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Nexus Study" dated April 2023.

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 7 ends

Prepar
Joseph M. Lambe
Director of Development Services
Reviewed and approved:

Da _ a rrula
City Administrator
Reviewed and approved:

Jenny er ampman
Director of Finance
Attachments:

1. Resolution No. R-2023-20 - Approving updated Citywide Development Impact Fees

2. Resolution No. R-2023-21 - Approving updated Transit Oriented Development Packinghouse District Development Impact Fees

3. Resolution No. R-2023-22 - Approving updated Residential Affordable Housing Impact Fees

4. Engineering News -Record City Cost Index Los Angeles April 2023

5. City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Nexus Study dated April 2023

RESOLUTION NO. R-2023-20

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UPDATED

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES PURSUANT TO

CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX TO FINANCIALLY

MITIGATE IMPACTS TO PARKS AND RECREATIONAL

FACILITIES, SEWER FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION

INFRASTRUCTURE, STORM DRAIN FACILITIES, QUIMBY

IN -LIEU FEES, AND ADOPTING PUBLIC SAFETY (FIRE,

POLICE, ANIMAL SHELTER) FEES PURSUANT TO THE
APRIL 2023 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
WHEREAS, the continuing growth of the City of Placentia ("City), combined with the expectation of high quality services by persons who live and work in the City, and reductions by the State of California in property tax allocations to local governments have been catalysts for the review of the City's existing and future public facilities and services made necessary by new development;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq., ("Mitigation Fee Act") the City is empowered to impose fees and other exactions to provide necessary public facilities required to mitigate the negative effects of new development in the City; WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 66477 et seq., ("Subdivision Map Act"), the City is empowered to require the dedication of land or impose a requirement of the payment of fees in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition to the approval of a tentative map or parcel map; WHEREAS, the proposed fees are based upon the information contained in a document and addendum prepared by City staff and SCI Consulting Group ("SCI") entitled "City of Placentia Citywide Development Impact Fees Nexus Study" dated August 2017 ("the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Report"); WHEREAS, the proposed updated public safety fees are based upon the information contained in a document and addendum prepared by City staff and SCI Consulting Group ("SCI") entitled "City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Nexus Study" dated April 2023 ("the updated Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Report") as it relates to updating public safety fees;
WHEREAS, detailed descriptions of each of the facilities, their approximate location, size, approximate time of availability and their estimated costs are set forth in the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports;
WHEREAS, copies of the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports are on file in the City Clerk's office and have been made available for public review in accordance with state law, as more fully described below;
Resolution R-2023-
20 NT 1

Page 1 of 5 ends

ATTACHME

WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports comply with California Government Code Section 66001 by establishing the basis for the imposition of fees in new development. In particular, the Development Impact Fee Reports:

1. Identifies the purpose of the proposed fees;

2. Identifies the use to which the fees will be put;

3. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the fees' use and the types of projects on which the fees are imposed;

4. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the types of developments on which the fees are imposed; and

5. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fees and the cost of the public facilities or portions of the facilities attributable to the developments on which the fees are imposed; WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports justify the imposition of each development fee on new construction by analyzing the General Plan, assigning the costs on a fair -share basis to the various types of development, and assigning the resulting fee per dwelling unit or per building square foot, based on the anticipated burden of such new dwelling and/or development on City facilities and infrastructure and the need created by such dwelling unit and/or development for new and expanded facilities and infrastructure;
WHEREAS, the fees collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance the public facilities described or identified in the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports;
WHEREAS, after considering the specific projects to be funded by the development impact fees and the cost estimates contained in the Development Fee Impact Nexus Study Reports, the City Council approves such projects and costs estimates and finds them reasonable as the basis for calculating and imposing the development impact fees;
WHEREAS, the projects and fee methodologies identified in the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports are consistent with the City's General Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Placentia hereby determines as follows:

A. Each owner of a lot or parcel of property within the Affected Territory, as described in Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code, shall pay to the City prior Resolution R-2023-
20 NT 1

Page 2 of 5 ends

ATTACHME

to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of any development project as defined therein, the following fees:

1. The Parks and Recreation Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit A to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit A.

2. The Sewer Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit A to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit A.

3. The Traffic Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit A to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit A.

4. The Storm Drain Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit A to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit A.

5. The Public Safety Impact Fees, now known as Fire, Police Animal Shelter fees described in the attached Exhibit A to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit A.

6. The Quimby Fee (In -Lieu Park/Open Space Fee) described in the attached Exhibit A to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit A.

B. The fees authorized by this section shall be cumulative such that each owner of a lot or property shall be charged each applicable fee, subject to any credits, deferrals, waivers and/or reductions authorized and set forth in Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code. Moreover, the amount of each of these fees shall not exceed the fair share of the estimated cost of constructing and/or acquiring the corresponding facilities described in the Development Impact Fee Reports. The amount of each fee shall be reviewed and revised from time to time, but not more than once annually, and shall be set by resolution of the City Council following due notice.

Section 2. Be it further resolved that any other resolutions and/or parts of any other resolution in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Section 3. Adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act because the adoption of this resolution is not a project, in that it is a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4)), and because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the fees may have a significant effect on the environment, in that this resolution contains no provisions modifying physical design, development, or construction of residential, commercial or industrial development or the construction of Resolution R-2023-
20 NT 1

Page 3 of 5 ends

ATTACHME

any development project. This exemption is based on CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), 15378(b)(4), and 15273.

Section 4. Should any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Resolution for any reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Resolution, it being hereby expressly declared that this Resolution, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase hereof would have been prepared, proposed, approved, adopted and/or ratified irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

Section 6. The fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution go into effect 60 days from the adoption of this Resolution, and concurrent with the effective date of this Resolution, Resolution No. R-2022-21 shall be repealed and replaced with this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of April 2023.

Ward L. Smith, Mayor
ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia, held on the 18th day of April 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmembers:

Resolution R-2023-
20 NT 1

Page 4 of 5 ends

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk

ATTACHME

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Resolution R-2023-
20 NT 1

Page 5 of 5 ends

ATTACHME

Land Use
Category
Unit
4 EXHIBIT "A"
TO RESOLUTION NO. R-2023-20
City of Placentia Citywide Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary of Citywide Development Impact Fees
Park and Quimby In
Recreation Lieu
Storm
Sewer Traffic Storm Storm Drainage
Drainage Drainage (Area G)
(Area A) (Area C)
1 1 2
Unit Fire Police Animal
Shelter
Single
Family
Detached DU $3,510.05 $5,276.11 $1,560.58 $1,622.72 $300.69 $137.32 $4,635.64 BSF $0.37 $0.43 $0.01 Housing
3 Single
Family
Attached DU $2,848.54 $4,292.85 $1,146.63 $1,622.72 $245.56 $111.26 $4,635.64 BSF $0.49 $0.57 $0.02 Housing
3 Multi -Family
Housing DU $3,230.41 $4,863.16 $876.01 $1,006.31 $187.43 $85.20 $4,635.64 BSF $0.85 $0.98 $0.03 Mobile
Homes
3 DU $2,569.90 $3,864.87 $1,019.34 $957.20 $281.65 $127.29 $4,635.64 BSF $0.66 $0.77 $0.02 3 Retail/ BSF
Commercial
$0.00 $0.00 $0.79 $1.69 $0.19 $0.08 $4,635.64 BSF $0.52 $0.60 Office BSF $0.00 $0.00 $1.18 $2.42 $0.12 $0.06 $4,635.64 BSF $0.74 $0.86 Industrial BSF $0.00 $0.00 $0.48 $0.95 $0.34 $0.15 $4,635.64 BSF $0.37 $0.43 Notes:
1 New development within the City's TOD area is not subject to the Sewer Impact Fee, the Traffic Impact Fee and the Storm Drainage Impact Fee 2 Storm Drainage Impact Fees for Area G only shall be set at $4,625 per acre pursuant to Agreement between the City of Placentia and the Yorba Linda Water District until it's expiration on October 11, 2027. Said Impact Fees shall not be automatically adjusted annually. 3 Applicable Citywide Development Impact Fees for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) shall be calculated as follows: For ADUs of less than 750 square feet: None. For ADUs of 750 square feet or more on a lot containing single family dwelling(s): The product of: (full fee for single family dwellings) x (square footage of the proposed ADU / square footage of primary dwelling) = ADU Development Impact Fee.

For ADUs of 750 square feet or more on a lot containing multi -family dwellings: The product of: (full fee for multi -family dwellings) x (square footage of the proposed ADU / average square footage of the multi -family units on site) = ADU Development Impact Fee.

For JADUs: JADUs that are permitted and contained within the existing square footage of a single-family residence shall not be subject to Citywide Development Impact Fees. However, JADUs that are part of new construction or are constructed as part of an addition to a single-family residence shall be subject to Development Impact Fees at the same rate as a single-family residence. 4 DU = Dwelling Unit: BSF = Building Area Square Foot.

Resolution R-2023-20
Exhibit A

RESOLUTION NO. R-2023-21

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UPDATED

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES PURSUANT TO

CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX TO FINANCIALLY

MITIGATE IMPACTS TO TRAFFIC AND

TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE, AND

STREETSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE TRANSIT

ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AREA, AND ADOPTING

SEWER FACILITIES FEES IN THE TRANSIT ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT AREA PURSUANT TO THE APRIL 2023

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
WHEREAS, the continuing growth of the City of Placentia ("City), combined with the expectation of high quality services by persons who live and work in the City, and reductions by the State of California in property tax allocations to local governments have been catalysts for the review of the City's existing and future public facilities and services made necessary by new development;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq., ("Mitigation Fee Act") the City is empowered to impose fees and other exactions to provide necessary public facilities required to mitigate the negative effects of new development in the City; WHEREAS, the proposed fees are based upon the information contained in a document and addendum prepared by City staff and SCI Consulting Group ("SCI") entitled "Development impact Fees Nexus Study for the Transit Oriented Development Area" dated June 2017 ("the TOD Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Report") WHEREAS, the proposed updated sewer facilities fees in the Transit Oriented Development area are based upon the information contained in a document and addendum prepared by City staff and SCI Consulting Group ("SCI") entitled "City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Nexus Study" dated April 2023 ("the updated Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Report") as it relates to updating sewer facilities fees in the Transit Oriented Development area;
WHEREAS, detailed descriptions of each of the facilities, their approximate location, size, approximate time of availability and their estimated costs are set forth in the TOD Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports;
WHEREAS, a copy of the TOD Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports are on file in the City Clerk's office and have been made available for public review in accordance with state law, as more fully described below; Resolution R-2023-21 ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1 of 4 ends

1. Identifies the purpose of the proposed fees;

2. Identifies the use to which the fees will be put;

3. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the fees' use and the types of projects on which the fees are imposed;

4. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the types of developments on which the fees are imposed; and

5. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fees and the cost of the public facilities or portions of the facilities attributable to the developments on which the fees are imposed; WHEREAS, the TOD Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports justify the imposition of each development fee on new construction by analyzing the General Plan, assigning the costs on a fair -share basis to the various types of development, and assigning the resulting fee per dwelling unit or per building square footage, based on the anticipated burden of such new dwelling and/or development on City facilities and infrastructure and the need created by such dwelling unit and/or development for new and expanded facilities and infrastructure;
WHEREAS, the fees collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance the public facilities described or identified in the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports;
WHEREAS, after considering the specific projects to be funded by the development impact fees and the cost estimates contained in the TOD Development Fee Impact Nexus Study Reports, the City Council approves such projects and costs estimates and finds them reasonable as the basis for calculating and imposing the development impact fees;
WHEREAS, the projects and fee methodologies identified in the TOD Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Reports are consistent with the City's General Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Placentia hereby determines as follows:

Resolution R-2023-21 ATTACHMENT 2

Page 2 of 4 ends

A. Each owner of a lot or parcel of property within the Affected Territory, as described in Chapter 5.03 of the Placentia Municipal Code, shall pay to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of any development project as defined therein, the following fees:

1. The Streetscape Infrastructure Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit A to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit A.

2. The Sewer Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit A to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit A.

3. The Traffic Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit A to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit A.

B. The fees authorized by this section shall be cumulative such that each owner of a lot or property shall be charged each applicable fee, subject to any credits, deferrals, waivers and/or reductions authorized and set forth in Chapter 5.03 of the Placentia Municipal Code. Moreover, the amount of each of these fees shall not exceed the fair share of the estimated cost of constructing and/or acquiring the corresponding facilities described in the Development Impact Fee Reports. The amount of each fee shall be reviewed and revised from time to time, but not more than once annually, and shall be set by resolution of the City Council following due notice.

Section 2. Be it further resolved that any other resolutions and/or parts of any other resolution in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Section 3. Adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act because the adoption of this resolution is not a project, in that it is a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4)), and because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the fees may have a significant effect on the environment, in that this resolution contains no provisions modifying the physical design, development, or construction of residences or commercial buildings or the construction of any development project. This exemption is based on CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), 15378(b)(4), and 15273.

Page 3 of 4 ends

one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

Section 6. The fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution go into effect 60 days from the adoption of this Resolution, and concurrent with the effective date of this Resolution, Resolution No. R-2022-22 shall be repealed and replaced with this Resolution.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 18th day of April 2023 Ward L. Smith, Mayor
ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia held on the 18th day of April 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmembers:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Resolution R-2023-21 ATTACHMENT 2

Page 4 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT "A"
TO RESOLUTION NO. R-2023-21
City of Placentia TOD Area Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary of TOD Area Development Impact Fees
Land Use Category
Single Family Detached
Housing
Single Family Attached
Housing
Multi -Family Housing
Mobile Homes
DU $1,317 $5,789 $5,407 $12,513
3 Retail/Commercial BSF $2.33 $5.26 $6.30 $13.89
Unit
DU
3 DU
3 TOD TOD
Traffic Sewer TOD Streetscape
Impact Impact Impact Fee
Fee Fee
Total TOD
Impact Fees
2 $2,232 $9,474 $7,384 $19,090
$2,232 $6,842
$5,995 $15,069
DU $1,384 $5,789 $6,799 $13,972
3 Office BSF $3.33 $7.89 $7.54 $18.75
Industrial BSF $1.30 $3.15 $4.95 $9.40
Notes:
1 DU = Dwelling Unit: BSF = Building Area Square Foot.
2 A fee credit must be given for demolished existing housing units or nonresidential building square footage as part of a redevelopment project.
3 Applicable Citywide Development Impact Fees for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) shall be calculated as follows: For ADUs of less than 750 square feet:

None. For ADUs of 750 square feet or more on a lot containing single family dwelling(s): The product of:
(full fee for single family dwellings) x (square footage of the proposed ADU / square footage of primary dwelling) = ADU Development Impact Fee. For ADUs of 750 square feet or more on a lot containing multi -family dwellings: The product of: (full fee for multi -family dwellings) x (square footage of the proposed ADU / average square footage of the multi -family units on site) = ADU Development Impact Fee.

Resolution R-2023-21
Exhibit A

RESOLUTION NO. R-2023-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UPDATED

CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING

IMPACT FEES FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS

CITYWIDE
WHEREAS, to implement the affordable housing goals, policies and programs of the City's Housing Element, the City Council has considered and adopted an affordable housing ordinance that, among other things, authorizes the imposition of residential affordable housing impact fees for certain residential development projects to mitigate the impact of such projects on the need for affordable housing in the City (the "Affordable Housing Ordinance");
WHEREAS, to ensure that future development projects mitigate their impact on the need for affordable housing in Placentia, and to ensure that any adopted residential affordable housing impact fees do not exceed the actual affordable housing impacts attributable to the development projects to which the fees relate, the City caused to be prepared a nexus study which was adopted in 2017;
WHEREAS, the "Residential Nexus Study", dated September 2017 (the Nexus Study"), prepared by Keyser -Marston Associates, Inc., quantifies the impacts of new market -rate units on the need for affordable housing in the city and the justified residential affordable housing impact fees to mitigate those impacts.

WHEREAS, the Nexus Study uses widely applied, appropriate methodology to determine the maximum amount needed to fully mitigate the need for affordable housing created by residential development;
WHEREAS, to ensure that development projects remain economically feasible, the recommended residential affordable housing impact fees as shown in the attached Exhibit A do not exceed the justified fees needed to mitigate the actual affordable housing impacts attributable to the development projects to which the fees relate, as determined by the Nexus Study;
WHEREAS, the Affordable Housing Ordinance and Title 5 of the Placentia Municipal Code authorizes the City Council to adopt by resolution residential affordable housing impact fees, and update said fees, and the City Council desires to do so; WHEREAS, the Affordable Housing Ordinance authorizes the City Council to adopt by resolution a fee for processing applications for waivers from or modifications to the residential affordable housing impact fees, and the City Council desires to do so; Resolution R-2023-22 ATTACHMENT
3

Page 1 of 4 ends

WHEREAS, at least ten days prior to the date this resolution is being heard, data was made available to the public indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the service for which the fee or service charge is levied, and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the service, including general fund revenues, in accordance with Government Code Section 66019;
WHEREAS, at least fourteen days prior to the date this resolution is being heard, notice was provided to any persons or organizations who had requested notice, in accordance with Government Code Section 66019;
WHEREAS, notice of the hearing on the proposed fee was published twice in the manner set forth in Government Code Section 6062a as required by Government Code Sections 66004 and 66018; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the information contained in this Resolution and the accompanying staff report and any attachments at a meeting held on April 18, 2023.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1.

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

2. The findings of the 2017 Nexus Study have been considered and are hereby incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

3. The facts and substantial evidence in the record establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for affordable housing and the impacts of the development described in the Nexus Study for which the corresponding fee is charged, and that there is also a reasonable relationship between the use of the residential affordable housing impact fee and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as is described in more detail in the Nexus Study.

4. The Nexus Study sets forth cost estimates, in 2017 dollars, that are reasonable for constructing affordable housing, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed these costs.

5. The City Council hereby adopts those residential affordable housing impact fees shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

Resolution R-2023-22 ATTACHMENT
3

Page 2 of 4 ends

6. All residential affordable housing impact fees collected shall be deposited into the City's Housing Impact Fee Fund to be used to increase and preserve the supply of housing affordable to households of extremely low, very low, low, and moderate incomes (including necessary administrative costs).

7. The City Council may review residential affordable housing impact fees from time to time. For any annual period during which the City Council does not review the residential affordable housing impact fee, fee amounts shall be adjusted once annually by the Development Services Director based on the percentage increase in the Engineering News -Record Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles, California.

8. The City Council finds that all of the residential affordable housing impact fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution do not exceed the actual affordable housing impacts of the development projects to which those residential affordable housing impact fees relate, as further set forth in the Nexus Study.

9. Adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act because the adoption of this resolution is not a project, in that it is a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4)), and because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the fees may have a significant effect on the environment, in that this resolution contains no provisions modifying the physical design, development, or construction of residences or the construction of any development project. This exemption is based on CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), 15378(b)(4), and 15273.

Section 2. Be it further resolved that any other resolutions and/or parts of any other resolution in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Section 3. Should any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Resolution for any reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Resolution, it being hereby expressly declared that this Resolution, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase hereof would have been prepared, proposed, approved, adopted and/or ratified irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

Section 5. The fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution go into effect 60 days from the adoption of this Resolution, and concurrent with the effective date of this Resolution, Resolution No. R-2022-23 shall be repealed and replaced with this Resolution.

Resolution R-2023-22 ATTACHMENT
3

Page 3 of 4 ends

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of April 2023.

Ward L. Smith, Mayor
ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmembers:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Resolution R-2023-22 ATTACHMENT
3

Page 4 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT "A"
TO RESOLUTION NO. R-2023-22
City of Placentia Residential Affordable Housing Impact Fee Schedule Project Type
Single Family Homes
Condominiums
Apartments
Resolution R-2023-22
Exhibit
A
Residential
Affordable Housing
Impact Fee Per
Unit
$8,052.48
$5,752.20
$2,300.28

ENR
Engineering News -Record
City Cost Index - Los Angeles - As of April 2023
Like 0
Tweet Share
Share 103
The building and construction cost indexes for ENR's individual cities use the same components and weighting as those for the 20 -city national indexes. The city indexes use local prices for portland cement and 2 X 4 lumber and the national average price for structural steel. The city's BCI uses local union wages, plus fringes, for carpenters, bricklayers and iron workers. The city's CCI uses the same union wages for laborers.

To find more recent cost index data, go to this webpage (link below) and click on the link for the year you need, and then navigate to the week you need. Keep in mind that the city cost index figures are always published in the second weekly issue of the month.
httn:// www.enr.com/economics/current costs
Go back to view all City Indexes.

ENR COST INDEXES IN LOS ANGELES (1978-2022)
YEAR
2023
2023
2023
2023
2022
2022
2022
2022
MONTH
April
March
February
January
December
November
October
September
BCI %CHG
8026.15 +0.4
8167.51 +6.9
8205.59 +9.6
8287.07 +13.6
7962.07 +10.4
7709.91 +7.9
7575.69 +8.2
7417.59 -1.2
CCI
13729.03
13870.23
13908.31
13989.79
13664.79
13412.66
13278.44
13120.34
%CHG
+0.2
+4.0
+5.5
+7.6
+5.8
+4.4
+4.5
-0.7
Privacy - Terms

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2022 August 7698.55 0.0 13401.30 0.0
2022 July 7872.42 +7.6 13575.17 +4.3
2022 June 7785.90 +6.3 13488.65 +3.5
2022 May 7968.04 +9.3 13670.79 +5.2
2022 April 7995.37 +24.2 13698.12 +12.8
2022 March 7638.66 +19.0 13341.33 +10.1
2022 February 7484.16 +17.1 13186.84 +9.1
2022 January 7293.41 +14.4 12996.09 +7.6
2021 December 7208.99 +13.2 12911.66 +7.0
2021 November 7145.56 +12.2 12848.24 +6.4
2021 October 7001.54 +10.0% 12704.21 +5.3%
2021 September 7509.80 +18.1 13212.48 +9.5
2021 August 7701.02 +21.3 13403.65 +11.2
2021 July 7314.89 +11.3 13017.52 +5.2
2021 June 7326.41 +15.3 13029.04 +8.1
2021 May 7292.66 +14.1 12995.29 +7.8
2021 April 6436.93 +0.8 12139.56 +0.7
2021 March 6416.68 +0.6 12119.31 +0.6
2021 Feb 6388.59 +0.2 12091.22 +0.4
2021 Jan 6376.34 -1.6 12078.97 -0.5
2020 Dec 6365.59 0.0 12068.22 +0.3
2020 Nov 6368.59 0.1% 12071.22 0.4%
2020 Oct 6364.84 +0.1 12067.47 +0.3
2020 Sept 6359.71 +0.1 12062.34 +0.3

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2020 Aug 6349.32 -0.3 12051.94 +0.1
2020 July 6353.82 -1.4 12056.44 -0.5
2020 June 6353.05 -1.5 12055.68 -0.5
2020 May 6389.86 -1.2 12056.03 -0.6
2020 April 6387.36 -0.7 12053.53 -0.4
2020 March 6377.01 +1.6 12043.18 +0.8
2020 Feb 6376.73 +0.2 12042.90 +0.1
2020 Jan 6478.32 +2.1 12144.49 +1.1
2019 Dec 6368.01 +0.3 12034.19 +0.2
2019 Nov 6359.40 +0.3 12025.57 +0.2
2019 Oct 6360.90 +0.3 12027.07 +0.1
2019 Sept 6355.27 +0.3 12021.45 +0.2
2019 Aug 6371.00 +0.6 12037.18 +0.3
2019 July 6446.97 +2.0 12113.16 +1.1
2019 June 6447.02 +2.8 12113.16 +1.4
2019 May 6464.47 +3.1 12130.66 +1.6
2019 April 6453.22 +2.9 12119.41 +1.5
2019 Mar 6277.68 +0.1 11943.60 +0.1
2019 Feb 6361.93 +1.5 12027.85 +0.8
2019 Jan 6345.43 +1.2 12011.35 +0.6
2018 Dec 6345.93 +1.2 12011.85 +0.6
2018 Nov 6340.43 +1.1 12006.35 +0.6
2018 Oct 6343.43 +1.2 12009.59 +0.6
2018 Sept 6336.58 +0.7 12002.50 +0.4

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2018 Aug 6334.33 +0.6 12000.25 +0.3
2018 July 6319.58 +2.7 11985.50 +3.0
2018 June 6274.33 +2.1 11940.25 +2.6
2018 May 6269.90 +2.0 11935.82 +2.6
2018 Apr 6269.90 +1.9 11935.82 +2.5
2018 Mar 6269.90 +3.4 11935.82 +3.3
2018 Feb 6269.90 +3.4 11935.82 +3.3
2018 Jan 6269.90 +3.4 11935.82 +3.3
2017 Dec 6269.90 +3.4 11935.82 +3.3
2017 Nov 6269.90 +3.8 11935.82 +3.6
2017 Oct 6269.90 +3.9 11935.82 +3.6
2017 Sept 6294.40 +6.9 11960.32 +7.0
2017 Aug 6296.40 +7.4 11962.32 +7.2
2017 Jul 6151.01 +4.9 11636.49 -0.0
2017 Jun 6147.89 +5.0 11636.49 +4.4
2017 May 6147.89 +4.9 11636.49 +4.4
2017 Apr 6153.85 +4.9 11642.47 +4.3
2017 Mar 6066.40 +3.4 11555.03 +3.6
2017 Feb 6066.40 +3.6 11555.03 +3.7
2017 Jan 6066.40 +4.2 11555.03 +4.0
2016 Dec 6066.40 +4.1 11555.03 +3.9
2016 Nov 6038.41 +3.7 11527.02 +3.7
2016 Oct 6037.41 +3.6 11526.02 +3.6
2016 Sep 5886.63 +1.0 11178.02 +0.5

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2016 Aug 5863.14 +2.50 11154.53 +1.60
2016 Jul 5863.64 +2.60 11155.03 +1.60
2016 Jun 5856.89 +2.40 11148.28 +1.50
' 2016 May 5858.89 +2.20 11150.28 +1.40
2016 Apr 5867.64 +02.40 11159.03 +1.50
2016 Mar 5866.39 +2.30 11157.78 +1.50
2016 Feb 5855.40 +2.00 11146.70 +1.30
2016 Jan 5823.91 +1.50 11115.28 +1.10
2015 Dec 5825.91 +2.10 11117.28 +3.40
2015 Nov 5826.71 +2.00 11116.01 +3.30
2015 Oct 5838.19 +2.50 11628.27 +8.20
2015 Sep 5831.47 +2.50 11120.77 +3.60
2015 Aug 5718.09 +0.50 10981.02 +2.30
2015 Jul 5718.09 0.00 10981.02 0.00
2015 Jun 5718.09 -0.25 10981.02 -0.13
2015 May 5732.34 0.00 10995.27 0.00
2015 Apr 5725.59 +0.7 10988.52 +2.4
2015 Mar 5732.34 +0.9 10995.27 +2.5
2015 Feb 5740.6 3.1 11003.54 2.5
2015 Jan 5736.07 3 10999 2.5
2014 Dec 5698.75 2.3 10747.68 0.1
2014 Nov 5710.55 2.1 10759.68 4.3
2014 Oct 5698.75 2.1 10747.68 4.3
2014 Sep 5689.25 2.4 10738.18 4.2

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2014 Aug 5688.50 2.4 10737.43 4.2
2014 Jul 5688.50 2.3 10737.43 4.2
2014 Jun 5690.50 2.4 10739.43 4.2
2014 May 5686.75 2.5 10735.68 4.2
2014 Apr 5685.75 2.6 10734.68 4.3
2014 Mar 5682.75 2.7 10731.68 4.4
2014 Feb 5565.83 0.5 10734.43 4.4
2014 Jan 5567.58 0.7 10736.18 4.5
2013 Dec 5570.08 0.9 10738.68 4.6
2013 Nov 5572.33 0.7 10740.93 4.5
2013 Oct 5580.33 0.8 11320.93 10.1
2013 Sep 5557.48 0.5 10305.43 0.3
2013 Aug 5556.23 0.4 10304.18 0.2
2013 Jul 5558.98 1.8 10306.93 0.1
2013 Jun 5556.73 1.7 10304.68 0.1
2013 May 5550.98 1.6 10298.93 0.0
2013 Apr 5541.23 1.7 10289.18 0.0
2013 Mar 5535.98 1.6 10283.93 0.0
2013 Feb 5536.98 2.3 10284.93 1.9
2013 Jan 5528.73 2.1 10276.68 1.8
2012 Dec 5522.98 2.1 10270.93 1.8
2012 Nov 5534.23 2.3 10282.18 1.9
2012 Oct 5535.23 2.4 10283.18 2.0
2012 Sep 5532.23 2.5 10280.18 2.0

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2012 Aug 5532.60 2.5 10280.55 2.0
2012 Jul 5461.22 1.4 10295.55 2.3
2012 Jun 5465.22 1.7 10299.55 2.5
2012 May 5465.72 1.8 10300.05 2.5
2012 May 5465.72 1.8 10300.05 2.5
2012 Apr 5450.97 1.6 10285.30 2.4
2012 Mar 5449.22 1.7 10283.55 2.5
2012 Feb 5414.62 1.1 10091.80 0.6
2012 Feb 5414.62 1.1 10091.80 0.6
2012 Jan 5414.62 1.7 10091.80 0.9
2011 Dec 5411.62 1.6 10088.80 0.8
2011 Nov 5411.12 1.5 10088.30 0.8
2011 Oct 5406.12 1.6 10083.30 0.8
2011 Sep 5399.62 4.2 10076.80 1.3
2011 Aug 5398.37 3.8 10075.55 1.1
2011 Jul 5385.62 3.5 10062.80 0.9
2011 Jun 5374.12 3.5 10051.30 0.9
2011 May 5368.37 3.7 10045.55 1.0
2011 Apr 5367.37 5.9 10044.55 2.8
2011 Mar 5357.87 5.8 10035.05 2.8
2011 Feb 5354.87 5.8 10032.05 2.8
2011 Jan 5323.12 5.2 10000.3 2.4
2010 Dec 5327.12 5.3 10004.3 2.5
2010 Nov 5330.37 5.4 10007.55 2.5

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2010 Oct 5321.87 5.2 9999.05 2.4
2010 Sep 5181.45 2.4 9948.55 1.9
2010 Aug 5202.09 2.8 9969.19 2.1
2010 Jul 5201.59 2.8 9968.69 2.1
2010 Jun 5195.09 2.4 9962.19 1.9
2010 May 5178.34 1.8 9945.44 1.6
2010 Apr 5068.58 -0.5 9771.69 -0.3
2010 Mar 5066.58 -0.6 9769.69 -0.3
2010 Feb 5060.58 -0.7 9763.69 -0.3
2010 Jan 5058.83 -1 9761.94 -0.5
2009 Dec 5060.58 -1.2 9763.69 -0.6
2009 Nov 5057.83 -2.2 9760.94 -1.2
2009 Oct 5057.58 -2.6 9760.69 -1.4
2009 Sep 5062.33 0.9 9765.44 4
2009 Aug 5063.08 2 9766.19 4.5
2009 Jul 5061.33 2.1 9764.44 4.6
2009 Jun 5074.08 3.8 9777.19 5.5
2009 May 5086.83 5 9789.94 6.1
2009 Apr 5094.33 5.6 9797.44 6.4
2009 Mar 5096.08 5.7 9799.19 6.5
2009 Feb 5093.58 6 9796.69 6.7
2009 Jan 5107.83 6.3 9810.94 6.8
2008 Dec 5120.08 6.6 9823.19 7
2008 Nov 5173.08 7.8 9876.19 7.6

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2008 Oct 5191.83 8.4 9894.94 7.4
2008 Sep 5014.96 4.7 9394.19 1.9
2008 Aug 4963.21 5.3 9342.44 5.4
2008 Jul 4956.46 5.2 9335.69 5.4
2008 Jun 4886.71 3.9 9265.94 4.6
2008 May 4844.71 2.3 9223.94 3.8
2008 Apr 4825.46 2.1 9204.69 3.7
2008 Mar 4820.46 2.1 9199.69 3.7
2008 Feb 4804.19 1.8 9183.42 3.5
2008 Jan 4804.19 1.8 9183.42 3.5
2007 Dec 4802.44 1.6 9181.67 3.4
2007 Nov 4799.94 1.2 9179.17 3.2
2007 Oct 4789.42 1.5 9216.07 3.9
2007 Sep 4788.42 8.3 9215.07 7.5
2007 Aug 4712.65 6.8 8863.27 3.5
2007 Jul 4710.65 6.8 8861.27 3.5
2007 Jun 4704.15 7 8854.77 3.6
2007 May 4738.2 7.6 8888.82 3.9
2007 Apr 4724.2 7.3 8874.82 3.7
2007 Mar 4722.47 7.3 8873.09 3.8
2007 Feb 4719.97 7.1 8870.59 3.6
2007 Jan 4720.47 6.7 8871.09 3.5
2006 Dec 4728.35 7.1 8878.97 3.6
2006 Nov 4742.45 8 8893.07 4.1

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2006 Oct 4717.7 8.3 8868.32 4.3
2006 Sep 4421.91 2 8572.47 1
2006 Aug 4419.66 4.1 8570.22 3.5
2006 Jul 4412.66 3.7 8563.22 3.3
2006 Jun 4396.16 3.1 8546.72 3
2006 May 4402.99 553.55 3.5
2006 Apr 4404.74 4.1 8555.3 3.5
2006 Mar 4401.74 4.8 8552.3 3.9
2006 Feb 4407.74 4.9 8558.3 3.9
2006 Jan 4422.86 6.4 8573.42 4.6
2005 Dec 4416.86 6.3 8567.42 4.6
2005 Nov 4389.61 5.9 8540.17 4.4
2005 Oct 4355.29 5.4 8505.85 4.1
2005 Sep 4334.64 4.9 8485.2 3.9
2005 Aug 4244.74 4.5 8277.95 5.4
2005 Jul 4256.74 5.1 8289.95 5.7
2005 Jun 4266.07 5.3 8299.28 5.8
2005 May 4233.98 5.6 8267.19 5.9
2005 Apr 4233.42 6.3 8266.63 6.3
2005 Mar 4200.5 6.6 8233.71 6.5
2005 Feb 4202.5 7.9 8235.71 7.1
2005 Jan 4156.27 8.1 8193.21 8.8
2004 Dec 4155.2 8 8192.14 8.8
2003 Dec 3847.3 1.6 7531.77 1.7

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
2002 Dec 3787.76 2.5 7402.75 2.4
2001 Dec 3694.24 0.4 7226.92 2.3
2000 Dec 3680.26 2.5 7068.04 3.6
1999 Dec 3591.01 -0.7 6825.97 -0.4
1998 Dec 3617 1.6 6851.95 2.8
1997 Dec 3560.53 3.9 6663.55 1.6
1996 Dec 3426.7 0 6558.44 0.5
1995 Dec 3427.26 0.2 6526.22 -0.1
1994 Dec 3420.42 2.6 6532.95 0.9
1993 Dec 3334.43 4.2 6477.84 2
1992 Dec 3198.66 3.3 6348.55 4.2
1991 Dec 3097.83 2.6 6090.12 1.6
1990 Dec 3020.51 5.8 5994.55 3.5
1989 Dec 2855.26 0.1 5789.77 0.3
1988 Dec 2851.67 1.2 5770.84 5.4
1987 Dec 2816.48 1.9 5474.14 0.4
1986 Dec 2762.63 3.7 5452.2 0.1
1985 Dec 2664.58 -2.3 5446.69 3.6
1984 Dec 2726.44 5.4 5259.93 3.9
1983 Dec 2586.58 1.8 5063.89 2.6
1982 Dec 2540.67 5.6 4934.14 8.9
1981 Dec 2405.22 5.9 4530.96 10.4
1980 Dec 2272.26 10 4102.37 12.7
1979 Dec 2065.79 4.9 3638.81 6.4

YEAR MONTH BCI %CHG CCI %CHG
1978 Dec 1969.77 8.9 3421.25 8.2
The latest news and
information
#1 Source for Construction News,
Data, Rankings, Analysis, and
Commentary

JOIN ENR UNLIMITED
Copyright ©2023. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing

CITY OF PLACENTIA

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
APRIL 2023

FINAL REPORT
PREPARED FOR:

CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF PLACENTIA
PREPARED BY:

SC[iConsultingGroup
4745 MANGELS BOULEVARD
FAIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA 94534
PHONE 707.430.4300
www.sci-cg.com

(This page intentionally left blank)

PAGE

CITY OF PLACENTIA

CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Ward L. Smith, District 5
Mayor Pro Tem Jeremy B. Yamaguchi, District 3
Councilmember Rhonda Shader, District 1
Councilmember Kevin Kirwin, District 2
Councilmember Chad P. Wanke, District 4

CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Damien Arrula

DEPUTY CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Luis Estevez

DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Joseph Lambert

FINANCE DIRECTOR
Jennifer Lampman

POLICE CHIEF
Brad Butts

FIRE CHIEF
Jason Dobine

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC ICansultingGraup

PAGE II

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This Development Impact Fees Nexus Study was prepared by SCI Consulting Group ("SCI") under an agreement with the City of Placentia ("City"). The work was accomplished under the general direction of Joe Lambert, Director of Development Services.

We want to acknowledge the special efforts made by the following individuals and organizations to this project:

Luis Estevez, City of Placentia
Jennifer Lampman, City of Placentia
Brad Butts, City of Placentia
Jason Dobine, City of Placentia
Sylvia Minjares, City of Placentia
Crystal Adams, City of Placentia
Dudek
Deborah Diep, CSU Fullerton Center for Demographic Research County of Orange Auditor's Office
County of Orange Assessor's Office

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 ConsultingGroup

PAGE III

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
FIRE IMPACT FEE 5
FIRE FACILITIES DEMAND FACTOR 6
EXISTING FIRE FACILITIES DEMAND EDUs 8
EXISTING FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES 8
EXISTING FIRE FACILITIES STANDARD 9
FIRE IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION 10
FIRE IMPACT FEE NEXUS FINDINGS 11
POLICE IMPACT FEE 13
POLICE FACILITIES DEMAND FACTOR 14
EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES DEMAND EDUs 15
EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES 16
EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES STANDARD 17
POLICE IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION 17
POLICE IMPACT FEE NEXUS FINDINGS 19
ANIMAL SHELTER IMPACT FEE 21
ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITIES DEMAND FACTOR 21
EXISTING ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY DEMAND EDUs 22
EXISTING ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY COSTS 23
ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITIES STANDARD 23
ANIMAL SHELTER IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION 24
ANIMAL SHELTER IMPACT FEE NEXUS FINDINGS 24
PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REVENUE 26
TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE 28
AVERAGE DAILY SEWER FLOW (GPD) 28
TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION 30
TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE NEXUS FINDINGS 30
COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES 32 FEE PROGRAM ADOPTION REQUIREMENTS 33
FEE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS 34
ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS 34
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 34
TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS 35

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 ConsultingGroup

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC ICansultingGraup

PAGE IV
ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT 36
FEE EXEMPTIONS 36
FEE CREDITS 36
NEXUS STUDY UPDATES 36
APPENDICES 38
APPENDIX A- RESIDENT EQUIVALENT DEMAND FACTOR 39
APPENDIX B - EXISTING FACILITIES, VEHICLES, AND EQUIPMENT 40

1. PAGE V

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM PUBLIC SAFETY IMPACT FEES 3 FIGURE 2 — MAXIMUM TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE 4
FIGURE 3 — FIRE FACILITIES EDU DEMAND FACTOR 7
FIGURE 4 — EXISTING FIRE DEMAND EDUs 8
FIGURE 5 — REPLACEMENT VALUE OF EXISTING FIRE SYSTEM 9
FIGURE 6 — EXISTING FACILITIES STANDARD 9
FIGURE 7 — MAXIMUM FIRE IMPACT FEE 10
FIGURE 8 — POLICE FACILITIES EDU DEMAND FACTOR 15
FIGURE 9 — POLICE FACILITY DEMAND EDUs 16
FIGURE 10 - REPLACEMENT COST OF EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES 16 FIGURE 11 - EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES STANDARD 17
FIGURE 12 — MAXIMUM POLICE IMPACT FEE 18
FIGURE 13 — EDU DEMAND FACTOR 21
FIGURE 14 -ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY DEMAND EDUs 22
FIGURE 15 — EXISTING ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY COSTS 23
FIGURE 16 —ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITIES STANDARD 23
FIGURE 17 — MAXIMUM ANIMAL SHELTER IMPACT FEE 24
FIGURE 18 — PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REVENUE 26 FIGURE 19 — TOD SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 28
FIGURE 20 — AVERAGE DAILY SEWER FLOW (GPD) AT BUILDOUT 29 FIGURE 21 — TOD SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PER GPD 29
FIGURE 22 — TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE 30
FIGURE 23 — COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND MAXIMUM PUBLIC SAFETY IMPACT FEES 32 FIGURE 24 — COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND MAXIMUM TOD SEWER IMPACT FEES 32 FIGURE 25 — RESIDENT EQUIVALENT DEMAND FACTOR 39
FIGURE 26 — EXISTING FIRE FACILITIES 40
FIGURE 27 — EXISTING FIRE APPARATUS, VEHICLES, AND EQUIPMENT 40 FIGURE 28 — EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES, PATROL VEHICLES, AND EQUIPMENT 41

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SCICansultingGraup

(This page intentionally left blank)

CITY OF PLACENTIA
PAGE Vi
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 ConsultingGroup

PAGE 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Placentia ("City") is located in northern Orange County and is bounded by the cities of Brea, Fullerton, Yorba Linda, and Anaheim. Incorporated in 1926, the City has grown to a current population of nearly 52,000. The Southern California Association of Governments ("SCAG") estimates that the City will grow to a population of 58,800 by 2040.

As new development occurs within the City, new or expanded capital facilities will be required to meet the demands of future development. Capital facilities will be partially funded through the City's impact fee programs.

This Development Impact Fee Nexus Study ("Nexus Study") was prepared pursuant to the "Mitigation Fee Act," as found in Government Code § 66000 et seq. The purpose of this Nexus Study is to establish the legal and policy basis for replacing the City's public safety impact fee with three new and separate impact fees — a fire impact fee, a police impact fee, and an animal control services fee. Additionally, the Nexus Study updates the City's Transit Oriented Development ("TOD") Sewer Fee. Each development impact fee addressed by this Nexus Study is determined separately.

In order to impose such fees, this Nexus Study demonstrates a reasonable relationship between new development, the amount of the fee, and the capital improvements funded by the fee. More specifically, this Nexus Study will present findings to meet the procedural requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act ("Act"), also known as AB 1600, which are as follows:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee. If the use is funding public facilities, the facilities must be identified. Identifying the public facilities may be a broad class of projects1 or made by reference to a capital improvement plan, made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or made in other public documents2.

2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put.

3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed ("benefit relationship").

4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the facilities and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed ("impact or need relationship").
1 According to Government Code § 66000(b) and validated by Homebuilders Association of Tulare/Kings Counties, Inc. v. City of Lemoore in 2010.
2 According to Gov't Code Section 66001(a)(2).

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023
SCIConsultingGra p

PAGE 2

5. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the facilities or portion of the facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed ("rough proportional relationship").

Additionally, the Act specifies that the fee shall not include costs attributable to existing deficiencies in public facilities but may include the costs attributable to the increased demand for public facilities reasonably related to the development project in order to refurbish existing facilities to maintain the existing level of service or achieve an adopted level of service that is consistent with the general plan.

The Nexus Study also outlines the procedural requirements for approval of the Nexus Study and proposed development impact fee programs ("fee programs") by the City Council. Also, the Act contains specific requirements for the annual administration of the fee programs. The last section of the Nexus Study provides these statutory requirements and other important information regarding the imposition and collection of the fees.

The figure below summarizes the maximum development impact fees determined by this Nexus Study. The land use categories are defined below. ■ "Single-family detached housing" means detached one -family dwelling units. ■ "Single-family attached housing" means attached one -family unit buildings with an assessor's parcel number for each dwelling unit.
■ "Multifamily housing" means buildings or structures designed for two or more families for living or sleeping purposes and having kitchen and bath facilities for each family.
■ "Mobile home" means a development area for residential occupancy in vehicles that require a permit to be moved on a highway, other than a motor vehicle designed or used for human habitation and for being drawn by another vehicle. ■ "Accessory dwelling unit" means a dwelling unit, or "granny flat," either a detached or attached dwelling unit, which provides complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons with provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the primary residence. ■ "Retail / Commercial" means buildings to be used for retail, general commercial, hotel/motel, private school, and similar nonresidential occupancy. ■ "Office" means a building to be used for general business services, professional office, medical office, and similar nonresidential occupancy.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 3
■ "Industrial" means a building to be used for manufacturing, fabrication, assembly, storage, distribution, and similar nonresidential purposes.

FIGURE 1 — SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM PUBLIC SAFETY IMPACT FEES Maximum Maximum Maximum
Fire Impact Police Impact Animal Care
Land Use Categories Unit Fee 1 Fee 2 Impact Fee 3 Total Calc a b c d=a+b+c
Residential
Single -Family Detached BSQFT $0.37 $0.43 $0.01 $0.81
Single -Family Attached BSQFT $0.49 $0.57 $0.02 $1.08
Multi -Family BSQFT $0.85 $0.98 $0.03 $1.86
Mobile Home BSQFT $0.66 $0.77 $0.02 $1.45
ADU > 750 sq. ft. BSQFT $0.37 $0.43 $0.01 $0.81
Nonresidential
Retail / Commercial BSQFT $0.52 $0.60 $1.120
Office BSQFT $0.74 $0.86 $1.600
Industrial BSQFT $0.37 $0.43 $0.800
Notes:

See Figure 7.
2 See Figure 12.
3 See Figure 17.

Public safety impact fees for residential land uses shall be charged on the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure. Garages, carports, walkways, overhangs, patios, enclosed patios, detached storage structures, or similar areas are excluded.

The nonresidential land uses shall be charged for "covered and enclosed space" within the perimeter of a nonresidential structure. Any storage areas incidental to the principal use of the development, garages, parking structures, unenclosed walkways, or utility or disposal areas shall not be subject to the fee.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC!Co nsultingGroup

PAGE 4
FIGURE 2 — MAXIMUM TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE
Maximum
TOD Sewer
Land Use Category Unit Fee 1
Single -Family Detached DU $9,474
Single -Family Attached DU $6,842
Multi -Family DU $5,789
Mobile Homes DU $5,789
Retail / Commercial BSQFT $5.26
Office BSQFT $7.89
Industrial BSQFT $3.15
Notes:
1 See Figure 22.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 5

FIRE IMPACT FEE
Prior to 2020, the Orange City Fire Authority ("Fire Authority") provided first -responder fire protection services to the City of Placentia along with the Cities of Buena Park, Cypress, La Palma, and the unincorporated Orange County under a joint powers agreement. In 2020, the City established its own fire department providing first -responder fire protection services, including fire prevention and suppression, emergency medical response, transport and rescue, and hazardous materials response. The City collects a public safety fee which funds new or expanded facilities for police, fire, and animal control services.

For purposes of the fire impact fee, the term "facilities" or "fire system facilities" will refer to facilities (land, stations, and other buildings), apparatus (engines, ambulances, and other vehicles), and equipment. The term "new development" will generally refer to the persons (residents and employees working in the City) and the structural area (residential area and nonresidential building area) in which the persons live or work.

The fee's purpose is to fund the one-time cost of expanding the City's facilities, apparatus, and equipment needed to maintain its existing level of service. No capacity exists to serve new development. If the City's fire system capacity is not increased to satisfy the additional demand, the quality and responsiveness of the City's fire protection and emergency response services will deteriorate.

To determine the City's fire impact fee consistent with these substantive requirements, this Nexus Study utilizes a systemwide existing facility standard methodology. The facility standard methodology is commonly used for determining fire impact fees. It was validated by the Homebuilders Association of Tulare/Kings Counties, Inc. v. City of Lemoore in 2010.

Under this method, identification and use of an existing facility standard and the restricted uses of fee revenue ensure that new development will not fund any existing deficiencies as prohibited by the Act. Instead, only capital improvements and apparatus, vehicle, and equipment purchases that expand the City's fire system are allowable uses of fee revenue.

Likewise, the fee program will generate only enough revenue to proportionally expand the fire system to maintain the existing level of service.

The existing facility standard is based on the City's ratio of existing fire protection and emergency response facilities, apparatus, and equipment to the existing service population. Existing development refers to the persons residents and employees working in the City. The City's existing fire system's value is determined using the replacement value of the City's existing inventory of fire protection facilities, apparatus, and equipment.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023
SCIConsultingGra p

PAGE 6
These costs are then applied to seven land use categories in proportion to the need they create for fire protection and emergency response services.

The Act requires that in establishing a development impact fee program, the facilities funded by the fee must be identified. However, the Act provides flexibility regarding how that identification may be made. The fee program may identify a broad class of projects3 or made by reference to a capital improvement plan, made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or made in other public documents4.

The capital improvements within the City and apparatus and equipment purchases will benefit the City's entire fire system. The City's fire protection and emergency response resources are organized as an integrated fire system. The resources of a one fire station do not serve a particular area in isolation from the City's other fire stations and resources.

When the City has a service call, whether, for a fire or other emergency, the City's response often involves resources from multiple fire stations. Likewise, new development in area of the City is served by all the City fine facilities, apparatus, and equipment, not just by the nearest fire station.

FIRE FACILITIES DEMAND FACTOR
To determine the relative demand for fire facilities for various land uses, this Nexus Study relies on equivalent dwelling unit ("EDU") factors to compare fire facilities demand across four residential and three nonresidential land uses. This common approach allows for the cost of fire protection facilities, apparatus, and equipment to be equitably apportioned among residential and nonresidential land uses. The equivalent dwelling unit ("EDU") is also used to convert the nonresidential building area to a residential dwelling unit value.

This approach allows the cost of facilities, apparatus, vehicles, and equipment to be equitably apportioned among residential and nonresidential land uses.

Figure 3 on the following page shows the calculation of the facilities EDU demand factor for seven land use categories. The residential land use categories are expressed per dwelling unit, and the nonresidential land use categories are expressed per 1,000 square feet of building area. Each land use category's occupancy density is multiplied by their respective resident equivalent demand factor, then converted to single-family home value.

By this measure, for example, one single-family home creates the demand for fire facilities equal to 520 square feet of retail/commercial building area. 3 According to Government Code § 66000(b) and validated by Homebuilders Association of Tulare/Kings Counties, Inc. v. City of Lemoore in 2010.
4 According to Gov't Code Section 66001(a)(2).

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023
SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 7
Residential occupancy density is based on census data from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2021 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates for the City of Placentia.

Nonresidential occupancy density figures are from the 2001 "Employment Density Study" prepared by The Natelson Company, Inc. for the Southern California Association of Governments and expressed in terms of the number of employees per 1,000 square feet of building area. The density figure for "nonresidential" is weighted, assuming a land use mix of 25.0% retail/commercial, 10.0% office, and 65.0% industrial. For the purpose of this Nexus Study, these figures are considered to be representative of the employment density of future nonresidential development.

FIGURE 3 - FIRE FACILITIES EDU DEMAND FACTOR
Land Use Category
Calc
Resident
Equivalent Facility EDU
Unit Demand Demand Demand
Unit Density Factor 1 per Unit Factor
a b c=a*b b=a/3.41
Single -Family Detached Housing DU 3.41 1.000 3.41 1.00 Single -Family Attached Housing DU 2.76 1.000 2.76 0.81 Multi -Family Housing DU 2.87 1.000 2.87 0.84
Mobile Home DU 2.24 1.000 2.24 0.66
Residential DU 3.15 1.000 3.15 0.92
Retail / Commerical KBSF 2.33 0.436 1.02 0.30
Office KBSF 3.33 0.436 1.45 0.43
Industrial KBSF 1.67 0.436 0.73 0.21
Nonresidential KBSF 2.04 0.436 0.89 0.26
Notes:

See Appendix A.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 8
EXISTING FIRE FACILITIES DEMAND EDUs
Existing demand EDUs represent the level of existing development served by the City's existing fire system. Figure 4 below calculates the City's fire existing demand EDUs based on the total number of dwelling units and estimated nonresidential building area. As shown, the total existing demand EDUs for the City is 18,239.

Land Use
FIGURE 4 — EXISTING FIRE DEMAND EDUs
Calc
Total
Total Facilities Existing
Existing EDU Demand Demand
Unit 1 Units 2 Factor 3 EDUs
a b c = a " b
Single -Family Detached DU 9,816 1.00 9,816
Single -Family Attached DU 1,913 0.81 1,550
Multi -Family Housing DU 4,582 0.84 3,849
Mobile Home DU 573 0.66 378
Nonresidential KBSF 10,176 0.26 2,646
Total 27,060 18,239
Source: 2020 U.S. Census; City of Placentia; and SCI Consulting Group Notes:
1 DU = Dwelling Unit; KBSF = 1,000 Building Square Feet 2 From U.S. Census 2021 ACS 5 -Year Estimate for City of Placentia. 3 See Figure 3.
' Nonresidential units is determined by multiplying total housing units by an estimated jobs -to - housing ratio of 1.23 and 490 square feet per employees divided by 1,000.

EXISTING FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES
The next step in determining the City's existing fire facilities standard is to calculate the replacement value of the City's fire protection facilities, apparatus, and equipment. Figure 5 below presents a summary of replacement costs (in 2023 dollars) for the City's existing fire facilities (land and fire stations), apparatus (engines and special vehicles), and equipment. Fire station replacement costs are based on $800.00 per square foot. The estimated replacement value of the City's apparatus, vehicles, and equipment inventory is based on unit cost assumptions provided by the City. (The detailed inventory and estimated replacement value for each are provided in Appendix B.) The estimated replacement value of the City's existing fire protection facilities, apparatus, and equipment is approximately $13.4 million.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

FIGURE 5 — REPLACEMENT VALUE OF EXISTING FIRE SYSTEM
Fee Components
Land
Stations / Other Buildings
Apparatus / Vehicles
Equipment
Total Fire System Facilities
Source: Placentia Fire Department;
Group
Total
Replacement
Value (2023 $s)
$2,025,000
$6,961,600
$3,955,000
$431,500
$13,373,100
SCI Consulting
PAGE 9

EXISTING FIRE FACILITIES STANDARD
The City's ratio of existing fire facilities, apparatus, and equipment to the City's service population establishes the standard for determining new development's fair share of the cost to expand the City's fire facilities as growth occurs. As shown in Figure 6 below, this standard is represented by the existing fire system facilities cost of $733.21 per demand EDU.

FIGURE 6 — EXISTING FACILITIES STANDARD
Existing Fire System Facilities 1
Existing Demand EDUs 2
Existing Facilities Standard
Notes:
1 See Figure 5.
2 See Figure 4.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SCIConsultingGroup $13,373,100
18,239
$733.21

PAGE 10

FIRE IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION
Figure 7 below presents the calculation of the maximum fire impact fee. As shown, the fee is determined by multiplying the fire facility standard by their respective EDU demand factor plus an additional 4 percent for administering the fire impact fee program. The fee program administrative cost component is designed to offset the cost of collection, documentation, annual reporting requirements, five-year report requirements, periodic Nexus Study updates, and other costs reasonably related to compliance with the Act. The City may adopt fees lower than the maximum provided they are reduced by the same percentage for each land use category.

Land Use Categories
Calc
Residential
Single Family Detached
Single Family Attached
Multi -Family Housing
Mobile Home
ADU => 750 sq. ft. 5
Nonresidental
Retail / Commerical
Office
Industrial
FIGURE 7 - MAXIMUM FIRE IMPACT FEE
Existing EDU
Facilities Demand
Standard 1 Factor2
a b
$733.21 1.00
$733.21 0.81
$733.21 0.84
$733.21 0.66
$733.21
$733.21
$733.21

0.68 0.98

0.49 Cost per
Unit
c=a*b
per dwelling unit
$733.21
$593.45
$617.10
$481.64
per 1,000 sq. ft.

Fee
Program
Admin. 3
d=c*0.04
$29.33
$23.74
$24.68
$19.27
$500.99 $20.04
$716.01 $28.64
$359.08 $14.36
Average
Living 1 Maximum
Building Fire Impact
Sq. Ft. 4 Fee
e f=(c+d)/e
- per sq. ft. -
2,050 $0.37
1,250 $0.49
750 $0.85
750 $0.66
$0.37
- per sq. ft. -
1,000 $0.52
1,000 $0.74
1,000 $0.37
Notes:
1 See Figure 6.
2 See Figure 3.
3 Collection, documentation, annual reporting requirements, five-year report requirements, periodic Nexus Study updates and other costs reasonably related to compliance with the Act. 4 Average dwelling unit sizes are provided by the City Development Services Department. 5Accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet are exempt. Accessory dwelling unit of 750 square feet or more must be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 11

FIRE IMPACT FEE NEXUS FINDINGS

PURPOSE OF FEE
The purpose of the fire impact fee is to fund the cost of fire protection and emergency response facilities, apparatus, and equipment attributable to new residential and nonresidential development in the City. The fire impact fee will ensure that new development will not burden existing development with the cost of expanded facilities, apparatus, and equipment required to accommodate growth as it occurs within the City.

USE OF FIRE IMPACT FEE REVENUE
Fee revenue will be used to fund the cost of expanded fire facilities, apparatus, vehicles, and equipment to serve new development. Below is a summary of the allowable and prohibited uses of fee revenue.

FIGURE 11 - SUMMARY OF ALLOWABLE AND PROHIBITED USES OF FIRE IMPACT FEE REVENUE Allowable Uses
• New (added) or expanded land and
facilities costs (100%)
• Apparatus, vehicles, and equipment
purchases that expand the system
inventory (100%)
• Facility costs already incurred to
provide growth -related capacity
(100%)
• Cost of an apparatus and vehicle
replacement attributable to new
development (11.0%)
• Portion of a renovation project that
expands service capacity
Prohibited Uses
• Existing deficiencies, such as
improvements to existing facilities that
do not expand service capacity
• Cost of an apparatus and vehicle
replacement attributable to existing
development (89.0%)
• Operational, maintenance, or repair
costs

BENEFIT RELATIONSHIP
The fee will be collected as development occurs. To maintain its existing level of fire protection and emergency response services, fee revenue will be used to replace and expand the City's facilities, apparatus, and equipment to meet the additional demand generated by the new residents and employees and the new structural area created by new development projects.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 ConsultingGroup

PAGE 12
Fee revenue will be deposited into a separate fire impact fee account or fund in a manner to avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds. The fee revenue will be restricted to the uses described in the "Use of Fee Revenue" finding. These actions ensure that a development project paying the fire impact fee will benefit from its use.

IMPACT RELATIONSHIP
New residential and nonresidential development projects in the City will grow the persons (residents and employees) and the structural area (residential area and nonresidential building area) in which persons live or work. The growth in persons and structural area will create an additional need for the City's fire protection and prevention, emergency response service, and a corresponding need for new or expanded facilities and replacement of apparatus, vehicles, and equipment. The fee will be imposed on different types of development projects for the additional service population generated and structural area created by new development projects.

ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY
The cost of fire protection facilities, apparatus, and equipment attributable to a development project is based upon the level of existing development served by the City's existing fire protection facilities. The use of an existing facility standard methodology to determine the fire impact fee achieves proportionality between existing development and new development. Moreover, these equivalent costs are applied to seven land use categories in proportion to the need they create for expanded facilities.

The use of a fire facilities demand factor to determine the fire impact fee schedule achieves proportionality across the types of development on which the fee is imposed.

Larger development projects will generate a higher number of residents and structural area to protect and, as a result, will pay a higher fee than smaller development projects. Thus, the application fire impact fee schedule to a specific project ensures a reasonable relationship between the fee and the cost of the facilities, equipment, and apparatus attributable to that project.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023
SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 13

POLICE IMPACT FEE
The Placentia Police Department ("Department") protects and serves the City through crime prevention, investigation, and other police services. The Department headquarters are located within the Placentia Civic Center at 401 East Chapman Avenue. This section determines the City's police impact fee.

For purposes of the police impact fee, the term "facilities" will refer to facilities (land, stations, and other buildings), vehicles (patrol and other vehicles), and equipment. The term "new development" will generally refer to City residents and employees working in the City.

The fee's purpose is to fund the one-time cost of expanding the City's police facilities, patrol vehciles, and equipment needed to maintain its existing level of service. No capacity exists to serve new development. If the City's police system capacity is not increased to satisfy the additional demand, the quality and responsiveness of the City's police services will deteriorate.

To determine the City's police impact fee consistent with the substantive requirements of the Act, the Nexus Study utilizes a citywide existing facility standard methodology. The facility standard methodology is commonly used for calculating police impact fees. It was validated by the Homebuilders Association of Tulare/Kings Counties, Inc. v. City of Lemoore in 2010. Under this method, identification and use of an existing facility standard and the restricted uses of fee revenue ensure that new development will not fund any existing deficiencies as prohibited by the Act. Instead, only capital improvements and vehicle and equipment purchases that expand the City's police system are allowable uses of fee revenue. Likewise, the fee program will generate only enough revenue to proportionally expand the police system to maintain the existing level of service.

The existing facility standard is based on the City's ratio of existing police facilities, vehicles, and equipment to the existing service population. Existing service population refers to City residents and employees working in the City. The City's existing police system's value is determined using the replacement value of the City's existing inventory of police facilities, patrol vehicles, and equipment. These costs are then applied to seven land use categories in proportion to the need they create for police service.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 14
The Act requires that the facilities funded by the fee must be identified in establishing a development impact fee program. However, the Act provides flexibility regarding how that identification may be made. The fee program may identify a broad class of projects5 or made by reference to a capital improvement plan, made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or made in other public documents6. This fee program identifies facilities (land, stations, and other buildings), vehicles (patrol and support), and equipment as the broad classes that will be funded with the fee.

POLICE FACILITIES DEMAND FACTOR
To determine the relative demand for fire facilities for various land uses, this Nexus Study relies on equivalent dwelling unit ("EDU") factors to compare fire facilities demand across four residential and three nonresidential land uses. This common approach allows for the cost of fire protection facilities, apparatus, and equipment to be equitably apportioned among residential and nonresidential land uses. The equivalent dwelling unit ("EDU") is also used to convert the nonresidential building area to a residential dwelling unit value.

This approach allows the cost of facilities, apparatus, vehicles, and equipment to be equitably apportioned among residential and nonresidential land uses.

Figure 3 below shows the facilities EDU demand factor calculation for seven land use categories. The residential land use categories are expressed per dwelling unit, and the nonresidential land use categories are expressed per 1,000 square feet of building area.

Each land use category's occupancy density is multiplied by their respective resident equivalent demand factor, then converted to single-family home value. By this measure, for example, one single-family home creates the demand for fire facilities equal to 300 square feet of retail/commercial building area.
5 According to Government Code § 66000(b) and validated by Homebuilders Association of Tulare/Kings Counties, Inc. v. City of Lemoore in 2010.
6 According to Gov't Code Section 66001(a)(2).

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC ICansultingGraup

PAGE 15
FIGURE 8 - POLICE FACILITIES EDU DEMAND FACTOR
Land Use Category
Resident
Equivalent Facility EDU
Unit Demand Demand Demand
Unit Density Factor 1 per Unit Factor
Calc a b c=a*b b=a/3.41
Single -Family Detached Housing DU 3.41 1.000 3.41 1.00 Single -Family Attached Housing DU 2.76 1.000 2.76 0.81 Multi -Family Housing DU 2.87 1.000 2.87 0.84
Mobile Home DU 2.24 1.000 2.24 0.66
Residential DU 3.15 1.000 3.15 0.92
Retail / Commerical KBSF 2.33 0.436 1.02 0.30
Office KBSF 3.33 0.436 1.45 0.43
Industrial KBSF 1.67 0.436 0.73 0.21
Nonresidential KBSF 2.04 0.436 0.89 0.26
Notes:
1 See Appendix A.

Residential occupancy density is based on census data from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2021 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates for the City of Placentia.

EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES DEMAND EDUs
Existing demand EDUs represent the level of existing development served by the City's existing police system. Figure 9 on the following page calculates the City's police existing demand EDUs based on the total number of dwelling units and estimated nonresidential building area. As shown, the total existing demand EDUs for the City is 18,239.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 16
FIGURE 9 — POLICE FACILITY DEMAND EDUs
EDU Existing
Existing Demand Demand
Land Use Category Unit Units 1 Factor 2 EDUs
Calc a b c=a*b
Single -Family Detached Housing DU 9,816 1.00 9,816
Single -Family Attached Housing DU 1,913 0.81 1,550
Multi -Family Housing DU 4,582 0.84 3,849
Mobile Home DU 573 0.66 378
Nonresidential KBSF 10,176 0.26 2,646
Total 27,060 18,239
Source: 2020 U.S. Census; City of Placentia; and SCI Consulting Group Notes:
1 DU = Dwelling Unit; KBSF = 1,000 Building Square Feet 2 From U.S. Census 2021 ACS 5 -Year Estimate for City of Placentia. 3 See Figure 8.
4 Nonresidential units is determined by multiplying total housing units by an estimated jobs -to - housing ratio of 1.23 and 490 square feet per employees divided by 1,000.

EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES
The next step in determining the City's existing police facilities standard is to calculate the replacement cost of the City's police facilities, vehicles, and equipment. Figure 10 summarizes replacement cost (in 2023 dollars) for the City's existing police facilities (land and buildings), patrol vehicles, and equipment. As shown below, the estimated replacement cost of the City's existing police facilities, patrol vehicles, and equipment is approximately $15.4 million in 2023 dollars. See Appendix B for more detail.

FIGURE 10 — REPLACEMENT COST OF EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES Total
Replacement
Fee Components Value (2023 $s)
Land $4,140,000
Stations / Other Buildings $6,658,905
Vehicles $1,650,000
Equipment $2,930,365
Total Police Facilities $15,379,270
Source: Placentia Police Department; SCI Consulting Group

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SCIConsultingGroup

PAGE 17

EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES STANDARD
The City's ratio of existing police facilities, vehicles, and equipment to the existing service population establishes the standard for determining new development's fair share of the cost to expand the City's police facilities as growth occurs. As shown below, the standard is represented by the police facilities cost of $843.21 per EDU.

FIGURE 11 — EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES STANDARD
Existing Police Facilities 1 $15,379,270
Existing EDUs 2 18,239
Existing Police Facility Cost Per EDU $843.21
Notes:
1 See Figure 10.
2 See Figure 9.

POLICE IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION
Figure 12 on the following page presents the calculation of the maximum allowable police impact fee. As shown, the fee per unit of development for each land use category is determined by multiplying the police facility standard by their respective EDU demand factor plus an additional 4 percent for administration of the fee program. The fee program administrative cost component is designed to offset the cost of collection, documentation, annual reporting requirements, five-year report requirements, periodic Nexus Study updates, and other costs reasonably related to compliance with the Act.

The City may adopt fees lower than the maximum provided they are reduced by the same percentage for each land use category.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SCIConsultingGroup

PAGE 18
FIGURE 12 - MAXIMUM POLICE IMPACT FEE
EDU Maximum
Facility Demand Cost per Fee Admin. Ave. Unit Police
Land Use Cateory Standard 1 Factor 2 Unit Cost 3 Sq. Ft. 4 Impact Fee Calc a b c=a*b d=c`0.04 e f=(c+d)/e
Residential per dwelling unit - per sq. ft. -
Single -Family Detached $843.21 1.00 $843.21 $33.73 2,050 $0.43 Single -Family Attached $843.21 0.81 $682.48 $27.30 1,250 $0.57 Multi -Family Housing $843.21 0.84 $709.68 $28.39 750 $0.98 Mobile Home $843.21 0.66 $553.90 $22.16 750 $0.77
ADU => 750 sq. ft. 5 $0.43
Nonresidential per 1,000 sq. ft. - per sq. ft. -
Retail / Commercial $843.21 0.68 $576.15 $23.05 1,000 $0.60 Office $843.21 0.98 $823.43 $32.94 1,000 $0.86
Industrial $843.21 0.49 $412.95 $16.52 1,000 $0.43
Notes:
1 See Figure 11
2 See Figure 8.
3 Collection, documentation, annual reporting requirements, five-year report requirements, periodic Nexus Study updates and other costs reasonably related to compliance with the Act. 4 Average dwelling unit sizes were provided by the City Development Services Department. 5Accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet are exempt. Accessory dwelling unit of 750 square feet or more must be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.

CITY OF PLACENTIA 1 1
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 19

POLICE IMPACT FEE NEXUS FINDINGS

PURPOSE OF FEE
The purpose of the police impact fee is to fund the cost of police facilities, vehicles, and equipment attributable to new development in the City. The police impact fee will ensure that new development will not burden existing development with the cost of expanded facilities, vehicles, and equipment required to accommodate growth as it occurs.

USE OF POLICE IMPACT FEE REVENUE
Fee revenue will be used to fund the cost of expanded facilities, vehicles, and equipment to serve new development. Below is a summary of the allowable and prohibited uses of fee revenue.

FIGURE 11 - SUMMARY OF ALLOWABLE AND PROHIBITED USES OF POLICE IMPACT FEE REVENUE Allowable Uses
• New (added) or expanded land and
facilities costs (100%)
• Vehicles and equipment purchases
that expand the system inventory
(100%)
• Facility costs already incurred to
provide growth -related capacity
(100%)
• Cost of a vehicle replacement
attributable to new development
(11.0%)
• A portion of a renovation project that
expands service capacity
Prohibited Uses
• Existing deficiencies, such as
improvements to existing facilities that
do not expand service capacity
• Cost of vehicles replacement
attributable to existing development
(89.0%)
• Operational, maintenance, or repair
costs

BENEFIT RELATIONSHIP
The fee will be collected as development occurs. To maintain its existing level of police services, fee revenue will be used to replace and expand the City's facilities, vehicles, and equipment to meet the additional demand generated by the new residents and employees created by new development projects.

Fee revenue will be deposited into a separate police impact fee account or fund in a manner to avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds. The fee

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 20
revenue will be restricted to the uses described in the "Use of Fee Revenue" finding.

These actions ensure that a development project paying the police impact fee will benefit from its use.

IMPACT RELATIONSHIP
New residential and nonresidential development projects in the City will grow the service population. Service population growth (new residents and employees) will create an additional need for the City's police service and a corresponding need for new or expanded facilities and replacement of vehicles and equipment. The fee will be imposed on different types of development projects for the additional service population generated by new development projects.

ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY
The cost of police facilities, vehicles, and equipment attributable to a development project is based upon the level of existing development served by the City's existing police facilities. Using an existing facilities standard methodology to determine the police impact fee achieves proportionality between existing development and new development.

Moreover, these equivalent costs are applied to seven land use categories in proportion to the need they create for expanded facilities.

The use of a police facility demand factor to determine the police impact fee schedule achieves proportionality across the types of development on which the fee is imposed.

Larger development projects will generate a higher service population and will pay a higher fee than smaller development projects. Thus, imposing the police impact fee schedule on a specific project ensures a reasonable relationship between the fee and the cost of the facilities, vehicles, and equipment attributable to that project.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023
SCIConsultingGra p

PAGE 21

ANIMAL SHELTER IMPACT FEE
The County of Orange ("County") provides animal care services to the City, along with other cities in the County, under a services agreement. The services agreement specifies that the City shall also pay its fair share of the construction cost of its new facility and equipment costs. These costs are applied to seven land use categories in proportion to the need they create for animal shelter services to establish a cost/fee per unit of development.

ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITIES DEMAND FACTOR
Figure 13 determines an equivalent dwelling unit ("EDU") factor for each land use category. The EDU expresses the service population of each unit of a given land use in terms of a single-family attached dwelling unit. Residential density figures are based on census data from the 2020 U.S. Census and expressed in terms of the average occupancy per dwelling unit.

FIGURE 13— EDU DEMAND FACTOR
Dwelling Unit
Residential Land Use Occupancy EDU Demand
Category Unit 1 Factor 2 Factor
Calc a b=a/3.41
Single -Family Detached Housing DU 3.41 1.00
Single -Family Attached Housing DU 2.76 0.81
Multi -Family Housing DU 2.87 0.84
Mobile Home DU 2.24 0.66
Source: 2020 U.S. Census; City of Placentia; and SCI Consulting Group Notes:
1 DU = Dwelling Unit
2 From U.S. Census 2021 ACS 5 -Year Estimate for City of Placentia.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 22
EXISTING ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY DEMAND EDUs
Existing demand EDUs represent the level of existing development served by the City's existing animal shelter system. Figure 9 on the following page calculates the City's animal shelter existing demand EDUs based on the total number of dwelling units and estimated nonresidential building area. As shown, the total existing demand EDUs for the City is 15,596.

FIGURE 14 — ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY DEMAND EDUs
EDU Existing
Existing Demand Demand
Land Use Category Unit 1 Units 2 Factor 3 EDUs
Calc a b c=a`b
Single -Family Detached Housing DU 9,816 1.00 9,816
Single -Family Attached Housing DU 1,913 0.81 1,548
Multi -Family Housing DU 4,582 0.84 3,856
Mobile Home DU 573 0.66 376
Total Residential 16,884 15,596
Source: 2020 U.S. Census; City of Placentia; and SCI Consulting Group Notes:
1 DU = Dwelling Unit; KBSF = 1,000 Building Square Feet 2 From U.S. Census 2021 ACS 5 -Year Estimate for City of Placentia. 3 See Figure 13.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023
SC IConsultingGrop

PAGE 23

EXISTING ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY COSTS
Figure 15 summarizes replacement cost (in 2023 dollars) for the City's share of the Orange County Animal Care Shelter facilities and equipment costs. As shown below, the City's share is approximately $381,200 in 2023 dollars.

FIGURE 15 — EXISTING ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY COSTS
OC Animal
Shelter Costs
Fee Components (2023 $s)
Buildings $317,200
Equipment $64,000
Total Animal Care Facilities $381,200
Source: City of Placentia; SCI Consulting Group

ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITIES STANDARD
The City's ratio of animal shelter facilities to existing EDUs establishes the standard for determining new development's fair share of the cost to expand the Orange County Animal Care Center facilities as growth occurs. The standard is represented by the animal shelter facility cost of $24.44 per capita.

FIGURE 16 — ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITIES STANDARD
Animal Shelter Facilities 1 $381,200
Existing EDUs 2 15,596
Existing Animal Shelter Facility Cost Per EDU $24.44
Notes:

See Figure 15.
2 See Figure 14.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023
SC IConsultingGrop

PAGE 24

ANIMAL SHELTER IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION
Figure 17 presents the calculation of the maximum allowable animal shelter impact fee.

As shown, the fee for each residential land use category is determined by multiplying the animal shelter facility standard by their respective EDU demand factor plus an additional 4 percent for administration of the fee program. The fee program administrative cost component is designed to offset the cost of collection, documentation, annual reporting requirements, five-year report requirements, periodic Nexus Study updates, and other costs reasonably related to compliance with the Act.

Land Use Cateory
FIGURE 17 — MAXIMUM ANIMAL SHELTER IMPACT FEE
Maximum
Fee Animal
EDU Program Average Shelter
Facility Demand Cost per Admin. Unit Sq. Ft. Impact Fee Standard 1 Factor 2 Unit (4%) 3 4 5
Calc a b c=a"b d=c"0.04 e f=(c+d)/e
per dwelling unit - per sq. ft. -
Single -Family Detached $24.44 1.00 $24.44 $0.98 2,050 $0.01 Single -Family Attached $24.44 0.81 $19.78 $0.79 1,250 $0.02 Multi -Family $24.44 0.84 $20.57 $0.82 750 $0.03
Mobile Home $24.44 0.66 $16.06 $0.64 750 $0.02
ADU => 750 sq. ft. 6 $0.01
Notes:

See Figure 16.
2 See Figure 13.
3 Collection, documentation, annual reporting requirements, five-year report requirements, periodic Nexus Study updates and other costs reasonably related to compliance with the Act. 4 Average dwelling unit sizes provided by the City Development Services Department. 5 The maximum animal shelter impact fee is rounded down to the nearest cent. 6 Accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet are exempt. Accessory dwelling unit of 750 square feet or more must be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.

ANIMAL SHELTER IMPACT FEE NEXUS FINDINGS

PURPOSE OF FEE
The purpose of the animal shelter impact fee is to fund the cost of animal shelter facilities for new residential development in the City. The animal shelter impact fee will ensure that new development will not burden existing development with the cost of expanded animal shelter facilities required to accommodate growth as it occurs within the City.

CITY OF PLACENTIA J�
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

1. PAGE 25

USE OF FEE REVENUE
Fee revenue will be used to fund the cost of expanded animal shelter attributable to new residential development.

BENEFIT RELATIONSHIP
The fee will be collected as development occurs. To maintain its existing level of animal shelter services, fee revenue will be used to replace and expand the City's animal shelter to meet the additional demand generated by the new residents created by new development projects.

Fee revenue will be deposited into a separate animal shelter impact fee account or fund in a manner to avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds. The fee revenue will be restricted to the uses described in the "Use of Fee Revenue" finding.

These actions ensure that a development project paying the animal shelter impact fee will benefit from its use.

IMPACT OR NEED RELATIONSHIP
New residential projects in the City will generate new residents. The increase in population will create an additional need for the City's animal shelter facilities and a corresponding need for new or expanded animal shelter facilities and equipment. The fee will be imposed on different types of residential development projects for the additional service population generated created by new residential development projects.

ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY
The cost of animal shelter facilities and equipment attributable to a development project is based upon the level of existing development served by the City's existing animal shelter facilities. The use of an existing facilities standard methodology to determine the animal shelter impact fee achieves proportionality between existing development and new development. Moreover, these equivalent costs are applied to four residential land use categories in proportion to the need they create for expanded facilities.

The use of a fire facilities demand factor to determine the animal impact fee schedule achieves proportionality across the types of development on which the fee is imposed.

Larger development projects will generate a higher number of residents and, as a result, will pay a higher fee than smaller development projects. Thus, imposing the animal shelter impact fee schedule on a specific project ensures a reasonable relationship between the fee and the cost of the facilities and equipment attributable to that project.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023
SCIConsultingGra p

PAGE 26

PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REVENUE
Figure 18 projects development impact fee revenue through 2040. Total development impact fee revenue (in 2023 dollars) is then calculated by multiplying the fire facilities demand standard by demand EDU growth. Certainly, arguments can be made for higher or lower population growth.

FIGURE 18— PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REVENUE
Existing
Demand EDUs Demand EDU Existing Facility Projected Fee
Development Impact Fee (2023) Growth (2040) Standard Revenue (2023$) Calc a b c d=b*c
Fire Impact Fees 18,239 1,999 $733.21 $1,466,000
Police Impact Fees 18,239 1,999 $843.21 $1,686,000
Animal Shelter Impact Fees 15,596 1,710 $24.44 $42,000
It is important to note at the fire impact fee program is designed not to be dependent on a specific capital improvement plan and specific level of new development. Only enough fee revenue will be generated for the City to expand its existing level of service to serve the growing service population.

As shown, fire impact fee revenue will contribute approximately $1.47 million and the police impact fee will contribute approximately $1.69 million (in 2023 dollars) towards the City's long-term capital improvement plan which represents new developments fair share of the plan. The City will need to fund existing development share with other funding sources. Other potential sources of funds include, but are not limited to, a general obligation bond measure, state and federal grants, the City's general fund, and existing or new special tax and assessment proceeds, if allowable.

Fee revenue may be used to fund up to 100 percent of the cost of new (added) or expansion of fire stations or new apparatus, vehicles, ambulances, and equipment added to the City's inventory. Additionally, the City many need to replace apparatus, patrol vehicles and vehicles more quickly due to the increase in service calls from the growth in the persons and structure area created by new development. Therefore, the City may use fee proceeds to fund up to 11.0 percent of apparatus, patrol vehicles, and other vehicle

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 27
replacement costs.' This amount represents costs attributable to the increased demand for existing apparatus, patrol vechicles, and other vehicle replacement to maintain the City's existing level of service. Fee revenue may not be used to fund 1) existing deficiencies such as station renovations and 2) operational, maintenance or repair costs.

Represents percentage growth in EDUs.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SCIConsultingGroup

PAGE 28

TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE
The most common way to measure the impact of development on sewer systems is by the volume of sewer flow to the system. The demand variable used in this analysis is average sewer flow in gallons per day ("GPD"). To ensure that new development pays only for capacity enhancement cost required to meet its needs, the sewer impact fee is calculated based on the anticipated volumes of sewer flow by new development.

As shown in Figure 19 below, the City's environmental engineers, Duduk, estimate that improvements for the TOD area would total $5.45 million. The results of Dudek's hydraulic model indicate that the peak dry weather sewer flows upstream of the TOD area experience a minor 8% increase as a result of estimated sewer loading from the proposed Old City Placentia redevelopment. Therefore, the 92% of the total project costs, or $5.01 million, is attributable to future development in the TOD area.

FIGURE 19 —TOD SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Probable TOD Future
Construction Est. TOD Dev Development
Cost (2023$) 1 Share % 2 Share $
Calc a b
TOD/Old Town CIP Project Cost $5,445,646 92% $5,009,994 Source: City of Placentia; Dudek; SCI Consulting Group
Notes:

City of Placentia Sewer Master Plan TOD Area Focused Capacity Analysis by Dudek, March 2017. 2 Results of the hydraulic model indicate that the peak dry weather wastewater flows (PDWF) upstream of the TOD Zone development experience a minor 8% increase as a result of estimated wastewater loading from the proposed Old Town redevelopment.

AVERAGE DAILY SEWER FLOW (GPD)
As shown in the next two figures, average daily sewer flow is estimated to be 98,989 gallons per day ("gpd") at buildout of the TOD area. Buildout is used since the TOD is planned to be completely redeveloped. Using the total sewer improvements attributable to the TOD area from the previous table, the cost per GPD is $50.61.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

1. FIGURE 20 — AVERAGE DAILY SEWER FLOW (GPD) AT BUILDOUT Land Use Category
Calc
Ave. Daily TOD Ave. Daily
Sewer Flow Landuse Sewer Flow
per Unit Plan at at Buildout
Unit (GPD) Buildout (GPD)
a b c
Single Family Detached Housing DU 180 (13) (2,340)
Single Family Attached Housing DU 130 (3) (390)
Multi -Family Housing DU 110 1,000 110,000
Mobile Homes DU 110 0 0
Retail / Commercial KBSF 100 36 3,635
Office KBSF 150 15 2,250
Industrial KBSF 60 (236) (14,166)
Total TOD Area 799 98,989
Sources: City of Placentia Public Works Department; Dudek; SCI Consulting Group FIGURE 21 — TOD SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PER GPD
Future Development Added Sewer Flow
Share (2023 $) (GPD) Cost per GPD
$5,009,994
98,989 $50.61
Source: City of Placentia; SCI Consulting Group

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup PAGE 29

1. PAGE 30

TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION
Figure 22 below presents the determination of the maximum allowable sewer impact fee for the TOD area. As shown, the sewer impact fee is determined by multiplying the cost per gallon per day for each land use category by their respective average daily sewer flow per unit plus an additional 4 percent for administration of the fee program.

It is important to note that a fee credit must be given for demolished existing housing units or nonresidential building square footage as part of a redevelopment project.

Land Use Category
Calc
FIGURE 22 — TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE
Ave. Daily
Sewer Flow Fee Total
per Unit Cost per Cost per Admin. Cost/Fee
Unit (GPD) 1 GPD 2 Unit Cost (4%) per Unit 3
a b c d=c*0.04 e=c+d
e = (c + d)/1000
Single -Family Detached DU 180 $50.61 $9,110.14 $364.41 $9,474 Single -Family Attached DU 130 $50.61 $6,579.54 $263.18 $6,842 Multi -Family DU 110 $50.61 $5,567.31 $222.69 $5,789
Mobile Homes DU 110 $50.61 $5,567.31 $222.69 $5,789
Retail / Commercial KBSF/BSF 100 $50.61 $5,061.19 $202.45 $5.26 Office KBSF/BSF 150 $50.61 $7,591.78 $303.67 $7.89
Industrial KBSF/BSF 60 $50.61 $3,036.71 $121.47 $3.15
Notes:
1 See Figure 20.
2 See Figure 21.
3 Total cost/fee is rounded down to the nearest dollar for residential land use categories and the nearest cent for nonresidential land use categories.

TOD SEWER IMPACT FEE NEXUS FINDINGS

PURPOSE OF FEE
Redevelopment of the TOD area of the City will create demand for additional sewer capacity. The purpose of this fee is to provide revenue that the City can use to help mitigate the impact new development will have on the City's sewer system.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 31

USE OF FEE REVENUE
Fee revenue will be used as a funding source for sewer capacity improvements in the TOD area to accommodate the projected net increase in sewer flow. Additionally, fee revenue will be used to cover fee program administration costs such as collection, documentation, annual reporting requirements, five-year report requirements, periodic Nexus Study updates, and other costs reasonably related to compliance with the Act. Fee revenue may not be used to fund operational, maintenance, or repair costs.

BENEFIT RELATIONSHIP
The TOD sewer impact fee will be collected as development occurs. Fee revenue will be used to expand the City's sewer infrastructure in the TOD area to meet the additional demand generated by new development. New development in the TOD area will contribute an additional burden to the City's sewer system. Fee revenue will be deposited into a separate account or fund in a manner to avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the City. The fee revenue will be restricted to the funding TOD sewer projects or repaying the City's general fund for expeditures advanced on TOD sewer projects. These actions ensure that a development project paying the fee will benefit from its use.

IMPACT RELATIONSHIP
According to the City's Sewer Capacity Study for the TOD area, redevelopment in the TOD area creates the need for additional sewer capacity.

PROPORTIONALITY RELATIONSHIP
The TOD sewer impact fee charged to new development in the TOD area is based on the cost of identified sewer capacity improvements that will need to be made to satisfy the projected increased sewer flow. The sewer capacity improvement costs are applied to seven land use categories in proportion to their average daily sewer flow per unit.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 ConsultingGroup

PAGE 32

COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FIGURE 23 — COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND MAXIMUM PUBLIC SAFETY IMPACT FEES Current Average Total
Public Public Safety
Land Use Category Unit Safety Fee 1 Fees 1 % Change
Single -Family Detached DU / Average Size DU $1,204 $1,662 38.0% Single -Family Attached DU / Average Size DU $977 $1,351 38.3% Multi -Family DU /Average Size DU $1,109 $1,396 25.9%
Mobile Homes DU / Average Size DU $881 $1,088 23.5%
Retail / Commercial BSQFT $0.82 $1.12 36.6%
Office BSQFT $1.17 $1.60 36.8%
Industrial BSQFT $0.59 $0.80 35.6%
Notes:
1 Current public safety fee is one fee which includes fire, police, and animial control services cost components. 2 For comparison purposes, total maximum fire, police and animal safety fees for the average size unit is shown.

FIGURE 24 — COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND MAXIMUM TOD SEWER IMPACT FEES Maximum
Current TOD TOD Sewer
Land Use Category Unit Sewer Fee Fee 1 % Change
Single -Family Detached DU $6,267 $9,474 51.2%
Single -Family Attached DU $4,525 $6,842 51.2%
Multi -Family DU $3,828 $5,789 51.2%
Mobile Homes DU $3,828 $5,789 51.2%
Retail / Commercial BSQFT $3.48 $5.26 51.1%
Office BSQFT $5.22 $7.89 51.1%
Industrial BSQFT $2.08 $3.15 51.4%
Notes:
1 See Figure 22.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 33

FEE PROGRAM ADOPTION REQUIREMENTS
The following are the general requirements for the adoption of the Nexus Study and the new development impact fee programs ("fee programs") by the City. The specific statutory requirements for the adoption of the fee program may be found in the Mitigation Fee Act (California Govt. Code § 66000 et seq.).

1. The City Council shall conduct at least "one open and public meeting" as part of a regularly scheduled meeting on the requested fee program.

2. At least 30 days before the meeting, the City shall mail out a notice of the meeting to any interested party who filed a written request for notice of the adoption of new or increased fees.

3. At least 30 days before the meeting, the County shall make available to the public the Nexus Study for review.

4. At least 30 days before the public hearing, a notice of the time and place of the meeting shall be published twice in a newspaper of general circulation with at least five days intervening between the dates of first and last publication not counting such publication dates.

5. After the public hearing, adopt an ordinance or resolution establishing the proposed fee program on behalf of the City.

6. The fee shall become effective 60 days after the adoption of the ordinance or longer as specified by the ordinance.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 34

FEE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS
This section summarizes the statutory requirements and general recommendations for the administration of the fee program. The specific statutory requirements for the administration of the fee program may be found in the Mitigation Fee Act (California Govt.

Code § 66000 et seq.).

ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS
Proceeds from the new development impact fees should be deposited into a separate fund or account so that there will be no commingling of fees with other revenue or unexpended balances of the existing fee program funds. Once the old existing fee program funds have been spent, the accounts should be closed.

The new development impact fees should be expended solely for the purpose for which they were collected. Any interest earned by such account should be deposited in that account and expended solely for the purpose for which originally collected.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The following information, entitled "Annual Report," must be made available to the public within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year:
■ a brief description of the type of fee in the account; ■ the amount of the fee;
■ the beginning and ending balance of the account;
■ the fees collected that year and the interest earned; ■ an identification of each public improvement for which the fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures for each improvement; ■ an identification of an approximate date by which development of the improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing of an incomplete public improvement; ■ a description of each inter -fund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, the date on which any loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest to be returned to the account; and
■ the amount of money refunded under section Govt. Code § 66001.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 ConsultingGroup

PAGE 35
The City shall review the Annual Report at the next regularly scheduled public meeting, not less than 15 days after the Annual Report is made available to the public. Notice of the time and place of the meeting, including the address where this information may be reviewed, shall be mailed, at least 15 days prior to the meeting, to any interested party who files a written request with the City for mailed notice of the meeting. Any written request for mailed notices shall be valid for one year from the date on which it is filed unless a renewal request is filed. Renewal requests for mailed notices shall be filed on or before April 1 of each year. The City Council may establish a reasonable annual charge for sending notices based on the estimated cost of providing the service.

For the fifth fiscal year following the first receipt of any development impact fee proceeds, and every five years thereafter, the City must comply with Government Code Section 66001(d)(1) by affirmatively demonstrating that the City still needs unexpended Development impact fees to achieve the purpose for which it was originally imposed and that the City has a plan on how to use the unexpended balance to achieve that purpose.

Specifically, the City shall make the following findings, entitled "Five -Year Findings Report," with respect to that portion of the account or fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted:
• Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put;
• Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged;
• Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements; and
• Designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.

The City shall provide for the refund of all or any part of such unexpended or unappropriated fee revenue, together with any actual interest accrued thereon, in the manner described in Government Code § 66001 (e) of the, to the current record owner of any property for which a fee was paid; provided that if the administrative costs of refunding such fee revenue exceed the amount to be refunded.

TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS
The City must clearly post the following information on the City's website regarding the fee program:
• The current fee schedule indicated the effective date when adopted by the City Council.

CITY OF PLACENTIA J....•
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 36
■ Current and five previous annual accounting reports.
■ Current and any previous Development Impact Fee Nexus Study conducted after January 1, 2018.

ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT
The cost estimates in this Nexus Study are in January 2023 dollars. The fees will need to be adjusted annually commensurate with changes in construction costs. The development impact fees should be adjusted on the first day of each fiscal year by the net percentage change from April to April of the preceding calendar in the Engineering News -Record Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles, or its successor publication.

FEE EXEMPTIONS
The following development projects are exempted from payment of the fee:
■ A structure owned by a governmental agency.
■ A structure which is being reconstructed following damage or destruction by fire or another casualty, or the voluntary demolition thereof, provided that the number of structures or the size in such reconstructed structure is no greater than the number of structures or the size of the structure prior to such damage, destruction or demolition.
■ An accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet. ■ A structure found to have no impact on applicable City facilities.

FEE CREDITS
In order to comply with the Act and recent court cases, a fee credit must be given for demolished existing square footage as part of a redevelopment project. Additionally, subject to certain restrictions, if a developer dedicates land, constructs facilities, or improvements for the City, the fee imposed on that development project may be adjusted to reflect a credit for the cost of the dedicated land, facilities constructed, or improvements provided.

NEXUS STUDY UPDATES
This Nexus Study and the fee programs must be updated at least every eight years. The next Nexus Study update is due no later than January 1, 2031.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023
SCICansultingGra p

(This page intentionally left blank)

CITY OF PLACENTIA
PAGE 37
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 ConsultingGroup

APPENDICES
Appendix A — Resident Equivalent Demand Factor
Appendix B — Existing Facilities, Vehicles, and Equipment PAGE 38

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

PAGE 39

APPENDIX A - RESIDENT EQUIVALENT DEMAND FACTOR
Resident equivalent demand factor is determined by comparing City residents and employees based on commute patterns and the estimated proportion of "waking" hours spent at work. Residents who work outside the City are estimated to spend an average of about 66 percent of their time in the City relative to those who do not work or whom both live and work in the City (2,000 hours divided by 5,840 hours). To avoid double counting, the time for residents who both live and work in the City is allocated based on the proportion of waking hours at work (34 percent) versus elsewhere (66 percent). After accounting for commute patterns, the typical worker is estimated to have a service demand equal to 43.6 percent of the typical resident.

FIGURE 25 — RESIDENT EQUIVALENT DEMAND FACTOR
Residents
and Jobs 1
Calc
Distribution
a/
0 a
Weighted
Weight 2 Average Normalized
b c=a*b
Residents
Not In Labor Force 19,313 38% 100% 38%
Employed in the City 1,585 3% 66% 2%
Employed Outside the City 30,569 59% 66% 39%
Total Residents 51,467 100% 79% 100.0%
Jobs
Live in the City 1,585 9% 34% 3%
Live Outside the City 16,447 91% 34% 31%
Total Jobs 18,032 100% 34% 43.6%
Sources: 2020 U.S. Census; SCI Consulting Group
Notes:
1 Based on commute patterns data from the U.S. Census Bureau for the City. 2 Weighting based on percentage of waking hours in a year (5,840) and percent of waking hours at work (2,000).

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup

APPENDIX B - EXISTING FACILITIES, VEHICLES, AND EQUIPMENT FIGURE 26 — EXISTING FIRE FACILITIES
Fire Station Units
Calc a
Station 1, 110 S. Bradford Avenue
Land 0.22 acres
Buldings 3,602 sq. ft.

Station 2, 1530 Valencia Avenue
Land 0.68 acres
Buldings 5,100 sq. ft.

Unit Cost
b
$2,250,000 per acre
$800.00 per sq. ft.
$2,250,000 per acre
$800.00 per sq. ft.

Total Replacement Cost (Land and Buildings)
Source: Placentia Fire Department; SCI Consulting Group Replacement
Cost (2023$)
c=a*b
$495,000
$2,881,600
$1,530,000
$4,080,000
$8,986,600
FIGURE 27 — EXISTING FIRE APPARATUS, VEHICLES, AND EQUIPMENT Make / Model
Seagrave Type I Engine
Seagrave Type I Engine
Seagrave Quint 100' Aerial Ladder
HME Type VI Mini Pumper
Ford F350 Battalion Chief Unit
Ford F350 Battalion Chief Unit
Ford F150 Service Truck
Ford Explorer Deputy Chief Unit
Ford Mach E Fire Chief Unit
Apparatus /
Vechicles
Replacement
Equipment Value (2023$)
$750,000 $95,000 $845,000
$750,000 $95,000 $845,000
$1,500,000 $95,000 $1,595,000
$350,000 $55,000 $405,000
$175,000 $22,500 $197,500
$175,000 $22,500 $197,500
$55,000 $12,000 $67,000
$120,000 $22,500 $142,500
$80,000 $12,000 $92,000
Total Apparatus and Equipment $3,955,000 $431,500 $4,386,500 Source: Placentia Fire Department; SCI Consulting Group

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SC IConsultingGroup PAGE 40

PAGE 41
FIGURE 28 — EXISTING POLICE FACILITIES, PATROL VEHICLES, AND EQUIPMENT Facility
Calc
Replacement
Amount Unit Cost Cost (2023$)
a b c=a*b
Police Headquarters'
Land 1.84 acres $2,250,000 per acre $4,140,000
Buildings 11,000 sq. ft. $800 sq. ft. $6,658,905
Vehicles 53 each $31,132 ave. each $1,650,000
Equipment $3,006,629
Total Existing Public Safety Facilities $15,455,534
Source: City of Placentia; SCI Consulting Group
Notes:
' Building area and land acres shown for represents 50% of the City Civic Center.

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 SCIConsultingGroup

(This page intentionally left blank)

CITY OF PLACENTIA
PAGE 42
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, 2023 ConsultingGroup

Placentia Cit Council

AGENDA REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
VIA: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: APRIL 18, 2023
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: ADOPTION OF PROPOSED OVERHEAD COST

ALLOCATION STUDY AND COMPREHENSIVE FEE AND RATE SCHEDULE FISCAL
IMPACT: The proposed fee changes as of July 1, 2023, are intended to recover the cost of providing existing services associated with those fee -related regulatory functions and other programs.

SUMMARY:

The City of Placentia is responsible for providing a variety of services to its citizens. Services that support the general public, such as public safety services are supported by tax and other non -fee revenues, while services that are more elective in nature and have specific individual beneficiaries are typically supported by user fee charges. User fee -related services are provided by many City departments, but tend to be more heavily concentrated in Planning, Building, Engineering and Community Services divisions. By law, user fees must not exceed the cost of the service provided.

The City Council can choose to set fees that fully recover the cost of service or place said fees at lower levels that provide a level of subsidy, or alternatively, reduce costs by reducing the level of service provided.

Annually, the City reviews its fees and makes adjustments to ensure fees are consistent with industry best practices and city processes, account for inflation and may also add new fees resulting from new programs and/or changes in service delivery. This consistent review and adjustment of fees provides multiple benefits, including:
• Increasing the availability of General Fund revenues to be used for services and activities available to all residents and businesses, such as public safety services. • Keeping pace with general cost inflation.
• Avoiding fee spikes that are more likely to occur when municipalities leave fees unchanged for a multi-year period.
• Providing fee payers, City staff, and City policymakers with a pattern of consistency that provides information for forecasting and decision-making purposes. • Helping to meet fee -payer service level expectations by collecting fees to fund the existing level of services provided.
• Encouraging generational equity among fee payers by avoiding long-term stagnation of fees followed by significant fee increases.

2.b.

April 18, 2023

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 2 of 4 ends

The last comprehensive fee update was completed in 2022 and prior to that completed in 2018, 2012 and 2007; Prior to 2007, the City's fee schedule had not been updated since 1990.

The City engaged Clear Source Financial Consulting to conduct a comprehensive fee study in 2022. Following their recommendation, Staff is proposing an adjustment of all fees by 5.1%, the CPI for All Urban Consumers (Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim, CA) for February 2023.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council consider the following actions:

1. Open the Public Hearing to consider amending the Placentia Comprehensive Fee Schedule for certain fees, rates, and charges for various City user services; and

2. Receive the Staff report, consider all public testimony, and discuss the proposed fees; and

3. Close the public hearing; and

4. Adopt Resolution No. R-2023-23, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, establishing and adopting certain City fees, rates, and charges for various City services with an effective date of July 1, 2023, for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed fees are intended to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws including providing confirmation that the proposed fees and charges are not a tax as defined in Article 13C of the California Constitution and that the proposed fees are no more than necessary to the cover the reasonable costs of the City's activities and services addressed in the fees. Additionally, the manner in which the costs are allocated to a payor bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payor's burdens on, or benefits received from the activities and services provided by the City.

Nearly every service for which a fee is imposed can be illustrated as follows, contrasting the components of the full cost of service, which is the maximum fee amount justified, against the local agency's goals for cost recovery:

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 3 of 4 ends

The Costs of Service Fee -Based Cost Recovery
Central Services/Governmental 100% = "Full Cost Recovery" Administration/Management
Materials/Services/Supplies
Indirect Service Labor
Direct Service Labor
$ per Year,
per Hour,
and/or
per Unit of
Service
Cost Recovery Target by Service:
• Public/Private Benefit Policies
• Market Sensitivity
• Compliance
• Fiscal Constraints/t-onsiderations
in the Organization
0% = Other Fund Subsidy
The City engaged Clear Source Financial Consulting to conduct a comprehensive fee study in 2022. Following their recommendation, Staff is proposing an adjustment of all fees by 5.1%, the CPI for All Urban Consumers (Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim, CA) for February 2023.

Other changes proposed to the fee schedule are outlined below.

Fire Prevention Fees
The City initially established its fees for fire prevention services in partnership with our consultant, Dennis Grubb and Associates whom the City has contracted with for fire inspection and plan check services. Recently, the City hired its first Fire Marshall and after considerable review of the current fire fees, it was determined that there were several fees not included in the fee schedule such as operational permits by type of operation (places of assembly, exhibits and trade shows, hot work operations, waste handling, etc.), false alarm response and first responder fees. In addition, state mandated fees including inspections for various types of facilities were not included on the current fee schedule including, day -cares, jail/ lockups, schools, hotel/ motels and others.

The proposed changes will allow the City to recover a much higher percentage of its costs related to its fire prevention services.

Development Services
With the passage of AB1124 in 2021 which went into effect January 1, 2022, the State decreased the permit fees local building departments can charge for solar energy systems. For residential solar energy systems, local jurisdictions may not charge a fee of more than $450 plus $15 per kilowatt for each kilowatt above 15 -kilowatt hours. For commercial solar energy systems, jurisdictions have a cap of up to $1,000 for systems up to 50 kilowatts plus $7 per kilowatt between

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 4 of 4 ends

51 kilowatts and 250 kilowatts, plus $5 per kilowatt for each kilowatt above 250 kilowatts. Changes are included in the proposed fee schedule to comply with this legislation.

In addition to the solar permit fee changes, Development Services is also proposing the addition of new fees including:
• Sidewalk Vendor Permit- The City currently does not have a permit process and/or associated fee for street vendors. Per state law, the City may not ban sidewalk vendors, but may require a permit and implement regulations pertaining to the location and operation of street vendors. A new permit fee is being proposed and an ordinance is currently being drafted to outline regulations on the operability of sidewalk vendors.
• Short -Term Rental Permit- The City currently charges a one-time permit fee for short-term rentals. To more accurately account for the city's ongoing costs with regulating short-term rentals, Staff is recommending an annual renewal process to align with industry practice and help ensure compliance by short-term rental operators.

Community Services
The Community Services department has identified a need within the community for summer day - camps for school -aged children. These camps would be full day and last five days per week, with participants registering on a per -week basis. Fees for the camps are included in the proposed fee schedule.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Additional revenues expected from the Proposed Master Fee Schedule are intended to offset the cost of providing existing services associated with those fee -related regulatory functions and other programs. Additional fee revenue is not intended to fund new services. Changes to fees are for cost recovery purposes only.

Prepared by: - -- Reviewed an• approv
Jen fifer Lampman
Damien R. Arrula
Director of Finance City Administrator
Attachments:

1. Resolution R-2023-23 - Establishing and Adopting Certain Fees

2. Notice of Public Hearing, Adjustment of Various Fees

3. PowerPoint Presentation

RESOLUTION R-2023-23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND ADOPTING

CERTAIN CITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES FOR

VARIOUS CITY SERVICES WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF
JULY 1, 2023 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
A. Recitals
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code section 66000 et seq.) the City of Placentia is authorized to adopt and implement fees, rates, and charges for municipal services; provided that such fees, rates, and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been given pursuant to Government Code Section 6062a, oral and written presentations have been made and received, and the required public hearing has been held; and WHEREAS, the City of Placentia desires to implement new fees, rates, and charges for various governmental services provided by the City of Placentia, as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred; and
WHEREAS, the actions implemented through the adoption of this Resolution are statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 21080(b)(8) of the Public Resources Code.

B. Resolution

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals. The recitals in Part A., above, are correct.

2. Estimated Costs. The fees, rates, and charges set forth in Exhibit A do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee, rate, or charge is levied.

Resolution R-2023-23 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 1 of 3 ends

3. Exhibit A. The fees, rates, and charges set forth in Exhibit A are hereby adopted and approved as the fees, rates, and charges for the services identified for each such fee, rate, or charge.

4. Effective Date of Fees. The fees, rates, and charges set forth in Exhibit A shall become effective on July 1, 2023.

5. Deleaated Authority. The City Administrator is hereby delegated the authority to reduce one or more fees included in Exhibit A by up to 10% of the adopted fee amount, based on market conditions.

6. Severability. If any fee, rate, or charge adopted or increased by this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such fee, rate, or charge shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision of this Resolution, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining fees, rates and charges adopted or revised herein. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one (1) or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 18th day of April 2023.

Ward L. Smith, Mayor
Attest:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, Robert McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia held on the 18th day of April 2023 by the following vote:

Resolution R-2023-23 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 2 of 3 ends

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Attachment:

Exhibit A: Master Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees — Effective July 1, 2023 Resolution R-2023-23 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 3 of 3 ends

PLACENTIA
Rich Heritage, Bright Futu r'
Master Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees
Effective July 1, 2023

City of Placentia
Master Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees
Table of Contents

ADMINISTRATIVE FEES

BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW FEES

BUILDING FEES

PLANNING FEES
1 2
3 10
ENGINEERING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEES 14
FIRE PREVENTION FEES 16

POLICE FEES

CODE ENFORCEMENT FEES
26 28
COMMUNITY SERVICES FEES 29

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
Activity Description
1 Returned Check Fee
a) First Check
b) Each Additional Check
2 EFT/ACH Return / Error
3 Postage
4 Digital Media Device
5 Documents - Hard Copy
a) Standard Size
b) Non-standard Size
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$27
$37
$27
Actual Cost
$11
$0.50
Actual Cost
6 Subpoena Response / Retrieval Fees Max. Authorized by State 1 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW AND INSPECTION FEES Activity Description
Business License Administrative Processing Fees
1 Admin Fee - New Account
a) Within City
b) Outside City
2 Admin Fee - Renewal
3 State Fee
[a] State mandated fee.
2 Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
Note
$53
$22
$22
$4 [a]

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - BUILDING PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW FEES Activity Description
Construction / Demolition
1 Construction / Demolition Project Application Fee
2 Impound Refuse Containers
Supplemental Plan Check Fees
3 First 2 Hours
4 Each Additional Half Hour (or portion thereof)
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$102
$156
$323
$143
Supplemental Inspection Check Fees
5 First 2 Hours $239
6 Each Additional Half Hour (or portion thereof) $95
Mechanical Permit Fees
7 Issuance Fee (charged to all permits) $27
8 Air Conditioner
a) 100,000 BTU or less (each) $64
b) Over 100,000 BTU (each) $95
9 Air Handler $95
10 Appliance Vent / Chimney (Only) $95
11 Boiler $95
12 Compressor $95
13 Duct Work $127
14 Evaporative Cooler $95
15 Exhaust Hood (Commercial Grease Hood) $262
16 Exhaust Hood and Duct (Residential) $95
17 Hear Pump (Package Unit) $95
18 Heater
a) 100,000 BTU or less $95
b) Over 100,000 BTU $95
c) Unit, Radiant, etc. $95
d) Wall / Floor $95
19 Vent Fan, Single Duct $80
20 Vent System $95
21 Walk -In Box / Refrigerator Coil $95
22 Other Mechanical Inspections (Per/Hr) $149
23 Stand-alone Mechanical Plan Check (Per/Hr) $185
Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - BUILDING PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW FEES Activity Description
Electrical Permit Fees
24 Issuance Fee
25 New or Re -Wire Power Apparatus
a) New or Re -Wire Residential (Per/Sq. Ft)
b) New or Re -Wire Garages (Per/Sq. Ft)
26 Busways
27 Light Standard or Private Street Light
a) First
b) Each Additional
28 Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors (EV Charger, Backup Batteries)
29 Outlets, Lights, and Switches (each)
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$27
$0.16
$0.14
$68
$121
$36
$80
$4
30 Power Apparatus (per HP, kV, KVA, etc.)
a) Up to and Including 1 $30
b) 2 to 10 $43
c) 11 to 50 $53
d) 51 to 100 $66
e) Greater than 100 $77
31 Pre -Inspection $85
32 Service or Panel (600V up to 1,000 amp) (Per/Unit) $143 33 Signs, Outline Lighting, and Marquees $80
34 Temporary Pole (each) $95
35 Theatrical -type Lighting Fixtures or Assemblies (each) $4 36 Other Electrical Inspections (Per/Hr) $149
37 Stand-alone Electrical Plan Check (Per/Hr) $185
Plumbing Permit Fees
38 Issuance Fee $27
39 Anti -Syphon Valve (each) $29
40 Backflow Preventer (each) $29
41 Bathtub (each) $29
42 Dishwasher (each) $29
43 Drain -Piping Repair / Alterations (each) $29
44 Drinking Fountain (each) $29
45 Floor Sink / Drain (each) $29
Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - BUILDING PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW FEES Activity Description
46 Garbage Disposal (each)
47 Gas Piping
a) First Five Outlets
b) Each Additional Five Outlets
48 Grease Interceptor
49 Grease Trap
50 Laundry
51 P Trap (each)
52 Roof Drain -Rainwater System (Per/Drain)
53 Septic System (each)
54 Sewer (new, add, repair, abandonment)
55 Sewer Cleanout Only (each)
56 Shower Stall (each)
57 Sink (each)
58 Solar Water System Fixtures (tanks, water treatment, equip) 59 Urinal (each)
60 Waste and Vent System
61 Water Closet (each)
62 Water Heater (each)
63 Water Line (each)
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$29
$60
$6
$358
$179
$29
$29
$29
$358
$29
$29
$29
$29
$60
$29
$119
$29
$29
$29
64 Water Pipe Repair Replacement
a) First 100 If $121
b) Each additional 100 If $53
65 Other Plumbing Inspections (Per/Hr) $149
66 Stand-alone Plumbing Plan Check (Per/Hr) $185
Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - BUILDING PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW FEES Activity Description
Miscellaneous Permit / Other Fees
67 Issuance Fee
68 Permit Re -issuance Fee (all types of permits)
69 Permit Extension (all types of permits)
70 Application Meeting (Group Meeting Fee)
71 Building & Zoning Inspection
72 Duplicate Job Card
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$27
$27
$27
$533
$85
$35
Note
73 Dedicated Inspector / Special Inspector Use 15% of Base Bldg Permit [a] Fee
74 Expedited Plan Review 15% of Base Plan Check [b]
Fee
75 Solar Panels
Residential Solar Panels- 10KW or less with expedited plan check $250 Residential Solar Panels over 15KW $450
Residential Solar Panels- 15KW or less with normal plan check $500 + $15/Kw over 15 Commercial Solar Panels- 50 KW or less $1,000
Commercial Solar Panels- Between 51 KW and 250 KW $1,000 + $7/Kw over 50 Commercial Solar Panels- Over 250 KW $2,400 + $5/Kw over 250 76 Address Change $1,864
77 Awning (Minimum Charge) $158 [c]
78 Close or Open Exterior Wall (Minimum Charge) $263 [c] 79 Wood Fence (Minimum Charge) $127 [c]
80 Masonry Wall (Minimum Charge) $158 [c]
81 Patio Cover (Minimum Charge) $158 [c]
82 Add for Screening (Per/ Sq. ft minimum charge) $4 [c] 83 Pre Fab Patio Room (Minimum Charge) $263 [c]
84 Residential Alterations (Minimum Charge) $211 [c]
85 Room Addition (Minimum Charge) $263 [c]
86 Roof
a) First 2,000 sf $339
b) 2,001 sf - 4,000 sf $465
c) 4,001 sf to 6,000 sf $715
d) 6,001 sf or more $896

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - BUILDING PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW FEES Activity Description
87 Pool Re -plaster
88 Gunite
89 Pool and Spa with Electrical / Plumbing
90 Spa or Hot Tub-inground (Pre -fabricated)
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$143
$682
$1,390
$512
Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - BUILDING PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW FEES Activity Description
91 Swimming Pool
a) Electrical
b) Plumbing
92 Stucco
a) First 400 sf
b) Each Additional 100 sf
93 Windows
a) 1 Only
b) 2 Only
c) 3-10
d) 11-20
e) 21-50
f) 51-100
g) 100-200
h) 200-500
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$108
$90
$299
$24
$95
$119
$215
$429
$645
$859
$1,075
$1,289
94 General Plan Update Fee (per $1,000 valuation) $4.00 95 Technology Enhancement Fee (per $1,000 valuation) $2.00 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - BUILDING PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW FEES Activity Description
Table 1-A - Building Permit Fees
Total Valuation
96 $1 to $500
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$71
97 $501 to $2,000
98 a) For the first $500 $71
b) plus $3.30 for each additional $100, or fraction thereof, to and $4 including $2,000
99 $2,001 to $25,000
a) For the first $2,000 $127
b) plus $15 for each additional $1000, or fraction thereof, to and including $16 $25,000
100 $25,001 to $50,000
a) For the first $25,000 $519
b) plus $10.85 for each additional $1000, or fraction thereof, to and $12 including $50,000
101 $50,001 to $100,000
a) For the first $50,000 $828
b) plus $7.55 for each additional $1000, or fraction thereof, to and $8 including $100,000
102 $100,001 to $500,000
a) For the first $100,000 $1,257
b) plus $6 for each additional $1000, or fraction thereof, to and including $7 $500,000
103 $500,001 to $1,000,000
a) For the first $500,000 $3,986
b) plus $5.10 for each additional $1000, or fraction thereof, to and $6 including $1,000,000
104 $1,000,001 and up
a) For the first $1,000,000 $6,885
b) plus $3.40 for each additional $1000, or fraction thereof $4 105 Plan Check 65% of Building Permit
Fee
Note
* If calculated fees do not reach the established minimum fee, the minimum fee applies. [a] For requests for dedicated inspection / special on-call inspection services, an additional fee of 15% of base building permit fees will apply (fee is in addition to base fees paid). Request is subject to Director approval and dependent on staff/consultant availability [b] For requests for expedited plan review, an additional fee of 15% of base plan review fees will apply (fee is in addition to base fees paid). Request is subject to Director approval and dependent on staff/consultant availability and workload. [c] Fee is greater of minimum charge or Table 1-A charge.

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - PLANNING FEES
Activity Description
1 Abandonment of Property
2 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Administrative Review
3 Adult Oriented Business
4 Sidewalk Vending Permit
5 Appeal of Staff Decision
a) to Planning Commission
b) to City Council
6 Building & Zoning Compliance Application
a) Minor
b) Major
7 CC&R's Review
8 Certificate of Compliance $1,346
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$4,389
$2,792
$10,136
$150
$3,106
$5,280
$104
$311
$2,335
9 Condominium Conversion $6,575
10 Development Agreement Review $10,153
11 Development Plan Review $13,980
12 Environmental Impact Report Admin/Review $8,824
13 Extension of Approval
a) Staff Approved Applications
b) Planning Comm/City Council Approved Applications
14 Film Permit
a) Commercial
b) Student
$1,243
$1,087
no charge
Note
[a]
[a]
[a]
[d]
15 General Plan Amendment $14,753
16 Home Occupation Permit $69 [c]
17 House Move $2,679 [a]
18 Initial Study Checklist $622
19 Landscape Plan Review (Residential - 3 or more) $518 [a] 20 Landscape Plan Check (Commercial) $518 [a]
10 City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - PLANNING FEES
Activity Description
21 Letter of Public Convenience/Necessity
22 Lot Line Adjustment
23 Negative Declaration
24 Planning Review / Research (Questions/Issues requiring research) a) First hour
b) Each additional 15 minutes
25 Preliminary Plan Review
26 Security Review
27 SB 9 Administrative Review
a) Review of Residential Home (or Homes) Plan $2,792
b) Administrative Tentative Parcel Map $5,948
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$1,139
$3,385
$3,793
$311
$52
Note
[a]
$3,001 [a]
$829
28 Short Term Rental Registration (one-time) $415
29 Short Term Rental Renewal (annual) $85
30 Sign Plan Review
a) Individual Sign $415
b) Integrated Commercial/Industrial Center $622
c) Master Sign Program $1,036
31 Site Plan Review
a) Minor $208
b) Major - Residential $2,792
c) Major - Commercial $2,792
32 Special Event Permit
a) Minor: outdoor display, etc. $158
b) Major: car show, fair, etc. $932 [e]
33 Specific Plan Review/Amendment
$10,878 [a]
34 Study Session (Applicant Requested) $1,243
35 Temporary Advertising Permit (includes banners, etc.) a) Annual Permit
b) Subsequent/Renewal Permit in Same Calendar Year
$104
$78
36 Tentative Parcel Map (4 or fewer parcels) $7,190
11 [f]
[g]

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - PLANNING FEES
Activity Description
37 Tentative Tract Map (5 or more Parcels/Lots/Units)
a) First 5 Parcels/Lots/Units
b) Each Additional Parcel/Lot/Unit
38 Third Party Review/Preparation of Plans
39 Underground Utility Waiver
40 Use Conformity Determination
41 Use Permit
a) Minor
b) Standard
c) Modification
i) Planning Commission
ii) Staff
d) Special
e) Use Permit - Temporary
i) New
ii) Renewal
42 Variance
a) Minor
b) With Other Applications
c) Standard
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$9,467
$104
$1,553
Note
[a]
$2,528 [a]
$932
$3,313
$10,276
$7,584
$1,450
$1,447
$932
$518
$3,547
$6,416
$9,447
43 Wireless Facility - Preliminary Plan Review $1,647
44 Zone Change $14,753
45 Zone Change - Text Only $3,887
46 Zoning Verification Letter $725
47 Mills Act Agreement $2,000
48 Mills Act Annual Compliance Review $200
48 Certificate of Appropriateness -Major $550
50 Certificate of Appropriateness -Minor $55
[a]
[a] Base fee as noted, plus, as needed, an initial deposit is determined by the Director of Development Services, against which the City will charge the cost or outside consultants/attorneys, other City costs and staff time at Fully Burdened Hourly Rates in excess of the amounts included in the base fee. If costs exceed deposit amount, additional deposit(s) will be required. [b] If City Councilmember brings appeal, no fee charged. [c] Plus inspection fee, if necessary.
[d] Permit required, but no fee charged.
12 City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - PLANNING FEES
Activity Description
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
Note
[e] Plus any costs from other departments.
[f] First-time registration permit fee.
[g] Renewal fee for existing businesses that have already registered with the City will be 75% of the initial registration permit fee. This reduced renewal fee will apply only to the same calendar year of the first-time registration date. 13 City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - ENGINEERING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEES Activity Description
General Permit and Inspection Fees
1 Grading - Standard Projects
a) Grading Permit
b) Plan Check
i) First Sheet
ii) Each Additional Sheet
c) Inspection
i) First Hour
ii) Each Additional Hour
2 Grading - Larger Projects - see Note 2
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$316
Note
$1,102 [a]
$694 [a]
$316
$158
Parcel / Tract Map Checking
3 Parcel / Tract Map Checking
a) Up to 5 Lots
i) First Sheet $1,918 [a]
ii) Each Additional Sheet $694 [a]
b) Greater than 5 Lots
i) First Sheet $2,529 [a]
ii) Each Additional Sheet $694 [a]
Other Permit and Inspection Fees
4 Traffic Control Plan Check - see Note 3 $1,632 [a]
5 Water Quality Management Plan Review $3,706 [a]
6 Sediment and Erosion Plan Check
a) 1st sheet $1,510 [a]
b) Each Additional Sheet $694 [a]
7 Transportation Permit
a) Transportation Permit - Annual (Each) $95
b) Transportation Permit - Single Trip (Each) $17
Encroachment
8 Encroachment Permit
a) Encroachment Permit
$316
b) Encroachment Plan Check
i) 1st sheet $816 [a]
ii) Each Additional Sheet $816 [a]
c) Encroachment Inspection
i) 1st hour $158
ii) Each Additional Hour $158

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - ENGINEERING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEES Activity Description
Other Services
9 PW Special Inspection (Per/Hr)
10 Traffic Engineering Development Plan Check Review -(Base Fee + Deposit) See Note 1
11 Traffic Impact Analysis Review - (Base Fee + Deposit) See Note 1 12 Sewer Capacity Study
FOG
13 FOG Plan Check Fee
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$158
$2,039
$2,447
$1,683
$974
14 FOG Annual Service
a) With Interceptor $280
b) Without Interceptor $2,292
Technology Enhancement Fee
15 Technology Enhancement Fee (per sheet) $12
Note
[a] Three checks included in fee.

Explanatory Notes:

Note 1: Base Fee as noted, plus, as needed, an initial deposit determined by the Director of Public Works, against which the City will charge the cost of outside consultants/attorneys, other City costs and staff time at Fully Burdened Hourly Rates in excess of the amounts included in the base fee. If costs exceed deposit amount, additional deposit(s) will be required.

Note 2: An initial deposit of amount indicated or as determined by the City Engineer, against which the City will charge the cost of outside consultants / attorneys, other City costs and staff time at Fully Burdened Hourly Rates. If Costs exceed deposit amount, additional deposit(s) will be required.

Note 3: Excludes minor projects that do not involve lane closures in major arterial streets.

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
Development Review
1 Small Project - Single family residence, single, ADU
2 Development Plan/Site Review/CUP
3 Map Review - Tentative Tract Map/Screen Check/and or Clearance letter for print linen 4 Fire Master Plan - Emergency access and fire hydrant location, fire lane markings, or vehicle gates across emergency access drives
5 Vehicle or pedestrian gates across emergency access roads Architectural Review (per building)
6 All A Occupancy 5,000 sq ft or under
7 All A Occupancy greater than 5,000 sq ft
8 E Day Care or l-4
9 E Occupancy educational
10 B, F, M, S Occupancies
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$364
$566
$405
$579
$461
$987
$1,124
$688
$1,124
$663
11 H Occupancy - Chemical classification fee $1,254
12 I or R2.1 Occupancies $1,739
13 R1 or R2 Hotels, motels, apartments, condominiums with 50 or less dwelling units per building $607 14 R1 or R2 Hotels, motels, apartments, condominiums with 50 or less dwelling units per building - Inspection $162 Only
15 R1 or R2 Hotels, motels, apartments, condominiums with 51 to 150 units per building $997 16 R1 or R2 Hotels, motels, apartments, condominiums with 51 to 150 units per building - Inspection Only $267 17 R1 or R2 Hotels, motels, apartments, condominiums with more than 150 dwelling units per building $2,070 18 R1 or R2 Hotels, motels, apartments, condominiums with more than 150 dwelling units per building - $647 Inspection Only
19 R3.1 RCF $518
20 R3.1 RCF - Inspection Only $162
21 R4 Licensed residential care / assisted living facilities $781 22 R4 Licensed residential care / assisted living facilities - Inspection Only $283 23 51 - Motor Vehicle Repair Garages (Chem class fee included for above ground hazardous materials) $906 16 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
Hazardous Processes/Systems/Materials
24 Above/underground storage tank (per tank, includes associated tank equipment) Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$618
25 Above -ground storage tank, including equipment - Inspection Only $227 26 Hazardous Material Process/Storage for Non - H Occupancies. Includes Chem Class Review 0 - 5 chemicals $672 27 Hazardous Material Process/Storage for Non - H Occupancies - Inspection Only 28 Chemical Classification Review 6 - 49 chemicals $542 29 Chemical Classification Review 50 - 100 chemicals $752 30 Chemical Classification Review more than 100 chemicals $1,116 31 High -piled storage: code/commodity compliance $1,037 $292
32 Refrigeration unit and system: having a refrigerant circuit containing more than 220 pounds of Group Al or $1,043 3- pounds of any refrigerant
33 Spray booth, spraying area $723
34 Gas Systems: medical gas, industrial gas (including piping and manifolds) $1,006 35 Gas systems: CO2 for Beverage $477
36 Special equipment: industrial ovens, vapor recovery, dust collection, Dry Cleaning $815 37 Photovoltaic System - Commercial $474
38 Battery Systems, stationary storage and cell sites $575 39 Emergency Responder Radio System $984
Suppression Systems
40 NFPA 13D fire sprinkler system: One or two family dwelling - (single lot) 41 NFPA 13D fire sprinkler system: One or two family dwelling - (single lot) - Inspection Only $528
$207
42 NFPA 13R fire sprinkler system: 3 to 16 units per building $641 43 NFPA 13R fire sprinkler system: 3 to 16 units - Inspection Only $250 44 NFPA 13R fire sprinkler system: 17 to 50 units per building $919 45 NFPA 13R fire sprinkler system: 17 to 50 units per building - Inspection Only $421 46 NFPA 13R fire sprinkler system: > 50 units per building $1,050 47 NFPA 13R fire sprinkler system: more than 50 units - Inspection Only $499 48 New NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system: 100 heads per riser $885 17 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
51 New NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system: each add'I riser OR per floor in buildings > 2 stories - Inspection Only 52 New NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system: R -1/R-2 each riser and per floor in buildings > 2 stories 53 New NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system: R -1/R-2 - Inspection Only 54 TI to NFPA 13, 13R fire sprinkler system: _ 100 heads OR other TLS requiring calculation review 57 TI to NFPA 13, 13R fire sprinkler system: >_ 100 heads OR other TLS requiring calculation review - Inspection Only
58 Pre -action fire sprinkler system: Includes the fire alarm system when submitted together 59 Pre -action fire sprinkler system - Inspection Only
60 NFPA 14 Class!, 11, or III standpipes (includes all standpipes within a single building) 61 NFPA 14 standpipes - Inspection Only
62 Fire pump installation
63 Underground fire protection system: 1- 5 appliances (single hydrant or riser equals 1 appliance) 64 Underground fire protection system: > 5 appliances (single hydrant or riser equals 1 appliance) 65 Underground repair
66 Commercial cooking hood and duct system (per system) Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$298
$410
$178
$384
$170
$773
$356
$739
$250
$667
$292
$977
$623
$977
$450
$376
67 Special extinguishing system: Dry Chemical, CO2, FM 200, Foam Liquid Systems, Inert Gas, Halon, & $701 Inergen
Alarm Systems
68 Fire sprinkler and Fire Alarm monitoring system up to 5 initiating devices and/or up to 20 notification $403 devices
69 Fire sprinkler and Fire Alarm monitoring system up to 5 initiating devices and/or up to 20 notification $125 devices - Inspection Only
70 Fire alarm system: 6 - 15 initiating devices and/or 30 initiating devices and/or > 80 notification devices $1,150 75 Fire alarm system: > 30 initiating devices and/or > 80 notification devices - Inspection Only $414 76 Field review/inspection - Underground repair $243
18 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
Administrative/Miscellaneous
77 Alternative Method and Material Request
78 Plan Revision
79 Reinspection Fee
80 Inspection time and materials fee (per hour)
81 Plan Review time and materials (per hour)
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$647
$267
$178
$178
$178
82 Fire Marshal time and material fee $203
83 Accelerated plan review (Per review. Fee is in addition to base fee assessed for plan review) $243 84 Coordination/Pre-submittal Meetings: (hourly minimum 2 hours) $405 85 Additional Review past 2nd review (each submittal) $267 86 After hours inspection $647
87 $162
Written Response to Inquiry (per hour)
88 Fire Watch -Inspector Standby Hourly Rate
First Responder Fees
89 Engine Company Inspections - Light/Ordinary Hazard $120 90 Engine Company Inspections - High Hazard $231
91 Engine Company Re -Inspection $169
92 False Alarm - Commercial $254
93 Engine Company Standby $254
94 False Alarm - Residential $529
19 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
Operational Permits
1 Aerosol products
2 Aviation Facilities and Aircraft refueling vehicles
3 Compressed Gases - Carbon Dioxide used in beverage dispensing systems 4 Compressed Gases - Flammable, greater than amounts listed in CFC T105.5.9 5 Combustible dust producing operations
6 Corrosive, less than exempt amount
7 Corrosive, greater than exempt amount
8 Covered and open mall buildings
9 Cryogenic fluids - operational
10 Cutting and welding
11 Dry cleaning
12 Explosives
13 Flammable and combustible liquids
14 Hazardous Productions Materials (HPM) Facilities
15 Additive Manufacturing
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$311
$311
$254
$436
$498
$373
$684
$2,043
$498
$267
$267
$622
$560
$560
$267
16 Amusement Buildings Same as Places of
Assembly
17 Carnivals and Fairs Same as Places of
Assembly
18 Cellulose Nitrate Film $205
19 Combustible Fibers $250
20 Energy Storage Systems $267
21 Exhibits and Trade Shows $200
22 Fire Hydrants and Valves $185
23 Floor Finishing $205
24 Fruit and Crop Ripening $149
25 Fumigation and Insecticidal Fogging $149
26 Hazardoud Materials $350
27 High -piled Storage $380
28 Hot Work Operations $231
20 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
29 Industrial Ovens
30 Lumber Yards and Woodworking Plants
31 Liquid or Gas -fueled Vehicles or Equipment in Assembly Buildings 32 LP -Gas
a) up to 499 gal water capacity
b) 500 gal water capacity or more
33 Magnesium
34 Miscellaneous Combustible Storage
35 Mobile Fueling of Hydrogen -Fueled vehicles
36 Motor -Fuel Dispensing Facilities
37 Open Burning
38 Open Flames and Torches
39 Open Flames and Candles
40 Organic Coatings
41 Outdoor Assembly Event - Occupant Load 1,000 or more 42 Places of Assembly
a) Occupant Load 50-500
b) Occupant Load 501-1000
c) Occupant Load 1,001 or more
43 Plant Extraction Systems
44 Private Fire Hydrants
45 Pyrotechnic Special Effects Material
46 Pyroxylin Plastics
47 Refridgeration Equipment
48 Repair Garages and Motor Fuel-Dispening
49 Rooftop Heliports
50 Spraying or Dipping
51 Storage of Scrap Tires and Tire Byproducts
52 Temporary Membrane Structures and Tents
21 Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$150
$285
$342
$171
$342
$355
$473
$254
$296
$296
$296
$296
$355
$473
$300
$380
$473
$211
$211
$651
$211
$296
$296
$355
$296
$211
$380
Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
53 Tire -rebuilding Plants
54 Waste Handling
55 Wood Products
56 Lithium Batteries
57 Production Facilities - Attendance of a live audience 58 Pyrotechnics and Special Effects
22 Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$355
$211
$380
$532
$473
Same as
Pyrotechnic Special
Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
Construction Permits
59 Aboveground storage tanks
a) 1st tank
b) Additional aboveground storage tanks
60 Close of flam LST, each
61 Close of flam LST, each add'I tank
62 Private Fire Hydrants, each
63 Modification of a UST permit
64 Transfer UST to a new owner
65 UST - new install of flam. LST
a) 1st tank
b) Each additional tank
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$1,066
$800
$1,155
$800
$467
$600
$311
$1,799
$1,155
66 UST system alteration; minor tank and piping repair $800 67 Flammable and Combustible liquids - < 1,000 sq ft $600 68 UST closure $1,932
69 Solar, gardens and landscaped roofs $622
70 Cryogenic fluids $711
71 Hazardous materials $1,155
72 High -piled Combustible Storage $533
73 Automatic Fire -Extinguishing Systems See Suppression Systems Fees for
inspection only
74 Compressed Gases $311
75 Emergency Responder Communication Coverage System
76 Energy Storage Systems
$626
$444
77 Fire Alarm and Detection Systems and Related Equipment See Alarm Systems Fees for inspection
78 Fire Pumps and Related Equipment $507
79 Fuel Cell Power Systems
80 Gas Detection Systems
81 Gates and Barricades Across Fire Apparatus Access Roads 82 Industrial Ovens
83 LP -Gas- Installation
23 $444
$394
$355
$211
Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
a) Up to 1,000 gal
b) 1,001 to 10,000 gal
c) 10,001 or more gal
84 Motor Vehicle Repair Rooms and Booths
85 Plant Extraction Systems
86 Smoke Control or Smoke Exhaust Systems
87 Solor Photovoltaic Power Systems
88 Special Event Structure
89 Spraying or Dipping
90 Standpipe Systems
91 Temporary Membrane Structures and Tents

STATE MANDATED
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$169
$355
$532
$296
$676
$1,099
$507
$592
$507
$592
$444
92 Assemblies A Occupancy - Two (2) inspections included in operational permit Fee 93 Schools - E Occupancy, including private schools $346 94 Hospital/Medical Facilities - 1 Occupancy $346
95 Jail/Lockup Facility Inspection $296
96 Group 1-4, Day Care facilities $400
97 Day Care - commercial $223
98 Day Care - large family $223
99 Convalescent/Care Facility Inspections $223
100 Laboratory - L Occupancy $342
101 Hotel/Motel
a) 1-30 untis $154
b) 31-50 units $196
c) 50 or more units $231
102 Multi -Family Residential
a) 3-10 units $120
b) 11-50 units $154
c) 50-75 units $296
24 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRE PREVENTION FEES
Activity Description
d) 75 or more units
103 Fire Clearance Pre -Inspection
a) 25 occupants or less
b) 26 occupants or more
25 Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$342
$50 or State
Fee/Actual Cost
$100 or State
Fee/Actual Cost
Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - POLICE FEES
Activity Description
Alarms and Alarm System Permits
1 Alarm Permit
a) Commercial (Annual Permit)
b) Residential (Annual Permit)
2 False Alarms (each alarm after first 2 for permit holders, each alarm for non -permit holders Miscellaneous Permits
3 ABC Permit
a) One Day Non -Profit
b) Commercial
4 Bingo Permit
5 Fortune Tellers/Annual Renewal
a) Non -Profit
b) For Profit
6 Gaming Permit
a) Non -Profit
b) For Profit
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$86
$29
$267
$151
$302
$53
$334
$667
$334
$667
7 Second Hand Dealer License/Renewal
a) Non -Profit $334
b) For Profit $667
8 Solicitor's Vendor's Permit/Renewal
a) Non -Profit $334
b) For Profit $667
9 Live Entertainment Permit
a) Non -Profit $334
b) For Profit $667
10 Carnival Permit Investigation
a) Non -Profit $334
b) For Profit $667
Other Police Fees/Services
11 Bike License
a) Per year
b) Three Year Renewal
26 Note
[a]
$3 [a]
$4

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - POLICE FEES
Activity Description
12 Civil Subpoena
a) Officer and/or other staff- (Deposit per day; actual costs per govt code 69096.1) b) Clerical (Nonrefundable fee plus hourly rate paid in full upon completion of subpoena) Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$275
$30/hr +$15 fee
c) Body Worn Camera (by subpoena only) (Nonrefundable fee, Digital Media Fee, plus hourly rate paid in $30/hr+$15 fee full upon completion of subpoena)
13 Party Disturbance (Second Response) ($0 first courtesy response) 14 Property Release Fee
a) Victims and first appointments for property owners
b) All Others (includes "no shows")
15 Public Fingerprinting Fee (Plus DOJ/FBI fees)
Permit Parking
16 Residential Parking Permits
a) First 5
17 Temporary Parking Permit
$353
$0
$34
$30
$12
$2
Traffic
18 Citation Sign Off - Fix -It Ticket- No charge for Placentia Residents $16 Reports and Administrative Services
19 Visa/Passport Clearance Letter
Vehicle Release Fee (Per Vehicle)
20 Vehicle Repossession Entry
$51
Note
[a]
[a]
$15 [a]
21 Vehicle Release
a) Non 30 -Day Impound / Vehicle Storage $199
b) 30 -Day Impound Release $296
c) 30 -Day Impound Release (DUI) $296
Records
22 Copies
a) Arrest Logs (per page)
b) Police Logs (per page)
c) Police Reports (per page)
d) Police Photos (per page)
e) Location Premise History Search (per page)
f) Digitial Media fee (each flash drive/ disc)
[a] Fee established by State of California.
27 $0.50
$0.50
$0.50
$0.50
$0.50
$10

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - CODE ENFORCEMENT FEES
Activity Description
Miscellaneous Fees
1 Massage Establishment Permit
2 Massage Technician Permit
3 Code Enforcement Reinspection
4 Code Enforcement Hourly Rate
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$552
$263
$135
$108
Note
[a] Hourly rate for Code Compliance inspections required or requested for which no other fees are listed, requests for special event support, etc. 28 [a]

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - COMMUNITY SERVICES
Activity Description
Aquatic Programs
1 Swim Lessons
2 Aquatics Day Class
3 Aquatics Night Class
Contract Recreation Classes
4 Class Fees
5 Instructor / City Percentages:

Classes held at City -Owned Facilities
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$74-85
$79-85
$74
market price
60% Inst / 40% City
Classes held at offsite / Non City -Owned Facilities 65% Inst / 35% City 6 Summer Day Camps (per week/per person) $150
7 Administrative Fee for Classes $11
Youth Sports Programs (Participant Registration Fee)
8 Placentia Youth Basketball $126
Adult Sports Programs (Team Registration Fee)
9 Adult Futsal (Indoor Soccer) $376
10 Adult Basketball $563
Excursions
11 Excursion
a) Single Day $63-135
b) Multi -Day $163-327
c) Administrative Fee $11
Facility Rentals (based on 2 hr minimum) - Includes Set Up, Cleaning, Breakdown, and Overhead
12 Permit Processing Fee (all users) $22
Whitten Center
13 Refundable Security Fee (Damage Deposit) $158
14 Resident Non Pofit
a) Main Room (150 Max)
i) Friday - Sunday $85
ii) Monday - Thursday $65
b) Room A or B (75 Max)
i) Friday - Sunday $65
ii) Monday - Thursday $57
29 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - COMMUNITY SERVICES
Activity Description
15 Resident, Non Resident Non Profit
a) Main Room (150 Max)
i) Friday - Sunday
ii) Monday - Thursday
b) Room A or B (75 Max)
i) Friday - Sunday
ii) Monday - Thursday
16 Non Resident
a) Main Room (150 Max)
i) Friday - Sunday
ii) Monday - Thursday
b) Room A or B (75 Max)
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$102
$85
$0
$76
$65
so
i) Friday - Sunday $102
ii) Monday - Thursday $93
17 Commercial
a) Main Room (150 Max)
i) Friday - Sunday $158
ii) Monday - Thursday $149
b) Room A or B (75 Max)
i) Friday - Sunday $130
ii) Monday - Thursday $121
18 Kitchen (All Users) $132
Aguirre (60 Max)
19 Refundable Deposit (Damage Deposit) $106
20 Resident Non Profit
a) Friday - Sunday $65
b) Monday -Thursday $57
21 Resident, Non Resident Non Profit $0
a) Friday - Sunday $76
b) Monday -Thursday $65
22 Non Resident
a) Friday - Sunday $102
b) Monday -Thursday $93
30 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - COMMUNITY SERVICES
Activity Description
23 Commercial
a) Friday - Sunday
b) Monday -Thursday
Backs - Main Room (150 Max)
24 Refundable Deposit (Damage Deposit)
25 Resident Non Profit
a) Friday - Sunday
b) Monday -Thursday
26 Resident, Non Resident Non Profit
a) Friday - Sunday
b) Monday -Thursday
27 Non Resident
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$130
$121
$158
$85
$65
$102
$85
a) Friday - Sunday $130
b) Monday - Thursday $113
28 Commercial
a) Friday - Sunday $158
b) Monday - Thursday $149
Koch Building (30 Max)
29 Refundable Deposit (Damage Deposit) $106
30 Resident Non Profit
a) Friday - Sunday $57
b) Monday -Thursday $57
31 Resident, Non Resident Non Profit $0
a) Friday - Sunday $65
b) Monday -Thursday $57
32 Non Resident $0
a) Friday - Sunday $93
b) Monday -Thursday $82
33 Commercial $0
a) Friday - Sunday $93
b) Monday -Thursday $82
31 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - COMMUNITY SERVICES
Activity Description
Gyms
34 Gyms Refundable Security Fee (Damage Deposit)
35 Oberle Gym (348 Max)
a) Resident Non Profit
b) Resident, Non Resident Non Profit
c) Non Resident
d) Commercial
36 Tynes Gym (303 Max)
a) Resident Non Profit
b) Resident, Non Resident Non Profit
c) Non Resident
d) Commercial
Gomez Community Center (60 Max)
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$106
$57
$65
$76
$85
$57
$65
$76
$85
37 Refundable Deposit (Damage Deposit) $106
38 Resident Non Profit
a) Friday - Sunday $65
b) Monday -Thursday $57
39 Resident, Non Resident Non Profit
a) Friday - Sunday $76
b) Monday -Thursday $65
40 Non Resident
a) Friday - Sunday $102
b) Monday -Thursday $93
41 Commercial
a) Friday - Sunday $130
b) Monday -Thursday $121
Pools
42 Whitten Center Pool Rental $313
43 Gomez Center Pool Rental $313
Special Events
44 For Grass Areas
a) Damage Deposit $316
b) Per Hour $48
32 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - COMMUNITY SERVICES
Activity Description
Park Shelter / Table Rentals (based on 2 hr minimum)
45 Permit Processing Fee (all users)
46 Picnic Shelters
a) Refundable Security Fee (Cleaning / Damage Deposit)
b) Kraemer Picnic Shelter Rental Rate (per shelter area) i) Resident
ii) Non Resident
b) Koch Picnic Shelter Rental Rate (per shelter area)
i) Resident
ii) Non Resident
47 Picnic Tables
a) Parque del Arroyo Verde Picnic Table Rental Rate
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$106
$64
$110
$64
$110
i) Resident $60
ii) Non Resident $103
b) Parque de los Vaqueros Picnic Table Rental Rate
i) Resident $60
ii) Non Resident $103
c) Tuffree Park Picnic Table Rental Rate
i) Resident $60
ii) Non Resident $103
c) Placentia Champions Sports Complex Picnic Table Rental Rate i) Resident $60
ii) Non Resident $103
Sportsfield Rentals (per hour)
48 Sportsfield Processing Fee - One time fee $74
49 Sporstfield Application Fee
a) Melrose Elementary School SB1
i) Resident Non Profit $8
ii) Resident $10
iii) Non Resident Non Profit $14
iv) Non Resident $23
v) Commercial $45
33 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - COMMUNITY SERVICES
Activity Description
b) Parque de los Ninos
i) Resident Non Profit
ii) Resident
iii) Non Resident Non Profit
iv) Non Resident
v) Commercial
c) PCSC
i) Resident Non Profit
ii) Resident
iii) Non Resident Non Profit
iv) Non Resident
v) Commercial
c) Tuffree Park P4
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$5
$7
$10
$14
$23
$8
$10
$14
$23
$45
i) Resident Non Profit $5
ii) Resident $7
iii) Non Resident Non Profit $10
iv) Non Resident $14
v) Commercial $23
d) Tuffree Park Baseball
i) Resident Non Profit $8
ii) Resident $10
iii) Non Resident Non Profit $14
iv) Non Resident $23
v) Commercial $45
d) Tuffree Park Tennis Courts 1 & 2
i) Resident Non Profit $4
ii) Resident $6
iii) Non Resident Non Profit $8
iv) Non Resident $12
v) Commercial $17
34 Note

City of Placentia

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - COMMUNITY SERVICES
Activity Description
d) Valdez Middle School SB1
i) Resident Non Profit
ii) Resident
iii) Non Resident Non Profit
iv) Non Resident
v) Commercial
d) Torii Hunter Softball
i) Resident Non Profit
ii) Resident
iii) Non Resident Non Profit
iv) Non Resident
v) Commercial
Athletic Field Lighting (per hour)
50 Kraemer Middle School
Fee Effective
July 1, 2023
$8
$10
$14
$23
$45
$8
$10
$14
$23
$45
a) P1 $13
b) P13 $13
c) P17 $17
d) P2 $13
e) SB1 $17
f) SB2 $17
51 Melrose Elementary School SB1 $17
PCSC
a)Jensen $17
b) March $17
c) Munoz $17
d) Valadez $17
52 Tuffree Middle School
a) P1 $17
b) P2 $17
c) P3 $13
d) P4 $13
e)SB1 $17
f) SB2 $17
g) Tennis Court 1 $7
h) Tennis Court 2 $7
53 Melrose Elementary School SB1 $17
35 Note

City of Placentia
401 East Chapman Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
City Clerk's Office (714) 993-8231

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Placentia will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers of Placentia City Hall, 401 E. Chapman Avenue on Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following item:

The adoption of a Resolution Establishing and Updating User and Regulatory Fees and Charges.

ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend this hearing and express opinions upon the items listed above.

ANY WRITTEN MATERIALS to be submitted must be submitted to the City Clerk at least twenty- four (24) hours prior to the hearing.

IF YOU CHALLENGE this proposal in court, you may be limited to, raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearings described in this notice or written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at 401 E Chapman Avenue, Placentia, CA 92870.

FURTHER INFORMATION on these items may be obtained at the City Clerk's Office or by telephone: (714) 993-8231.

Attest: Carole Wayman, Deputy City Clerk
PUBLISHED: Thursday, April 6, 2023 — Placentia News Times POSTED: Thursday, April 6, 2023

• The City maintains a Master Fee Schedule identifying applicable fees for various City Services
• Fees differ from taxes in that cities collect fees and charges for government services performed at the request of, or specifically for, aparticular individual, business or group...as opposed to services for the communityas a whole. pp
performed
Taxes
Paid by everyone for
government services that
benefit the entire community
such as public safety.

Fees
Paid by individual, business or
group for government services
that directly benefits
thems: Ives such as permits for
prix ate swimming pools,
facility rentals and business
licenses

• The Master Fee Schedule outlines permit fees and charges for service citywide but does not include general taxes such as property or sales tax, or Development Impact Fees (DIFs).
• These fees are on a different schedule and presented to City Council separately. • User Fees must be linked to and not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service.
• The full cost of service sets the maximum limit of a cost -based fee. • Cost of service includes direct program costs for I3bor, services, and supplies • Facilities overhead
• Departmental Administration
• Citywide administration and central support services

• The City engaged Clear Source Financial Consulting in 2022 to conduct a Comprehensive User Fee Study which was presented to and adopted by City Council on April 5, 2022.
• Clear Source recommended an annual review of all fees and adjustment by the CPI for subsequent fiscal years, with comprehensive fee studies recommended every 3-5 years.
• The most recent CPI data for the Los Angeles -Lc ng BE ach-Ar aheim, CA region was 5.1%.

Why Should Fees be Reviewed Frequently?
• Recovering the costs of providing fee -related services directly influences the City's fiscal health and increases the City's ability to meet the service level expectations of the fee payers. • A fee for service ensures that the individual bears most, if not all, of the cost incurred by the City to provide that service. • Frequent reviews of fees and charges for sery ce ensures rates are adjusted for inflation and reduces th 2 like ihood for significant increases in any one given year.

1. Open the Public Hearing to consider amending the Placentia Comprehensive Fee Schedule for certain fees, rates, and charges for various City user services; and

2. Receive the Staff report, consider all public testimony, and discuss the proposed fees; and

3. Close the public hearing; and

Placentia City Council

AGENDA REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
VIA: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DATE: APRIL 18, 2023
SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: REVISED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLAN FOR THE

PLACENTIA ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT
FISCAL
IMPACT: Estimated range of $17 to $24 million in property tax increment over approximately 40 years
Up to $59 million in net fiscal impact revenue to the City SUMMARY:

In response to the elimination of redevelopment agencies, California Senate Bill 628, effective January 1, 2015, and California Assembly Bill 313, effective January 1, 2016, authorized public agencies to form Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts ("EIFDs"), which are public financing instruments designed to succeed former Redevelopment Agency financing mechanisms and provide more flexibility than Infrastructure Financing Districts ("IFDs"). An EIFD is a governmental entity, separate and distinct from the city or county that establishes it and is governed by a Public Financing Authority ("PFA").

EIFDs can aid local government entities in funding public capital facilities, or other specified projects of communitywide significance, primarily by capturing tax increment revenue ("TI") generated within the district. EIFDs provide an opportunity for agencies to issue bonds for an array of public infrastructure projects as well as supporting economic development efforts in specific areas. Those areas of particular interest to Placentia are in the newly established Old Town Placentia Revitalization Plan area.

On February 19, 2019 the City Council approved Resolution No. R-2019-05, A Resolution of Intention ("ROI") proposing the establishment of the Placentia Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District ("Placentia EIFD") with the County of Orange and the initiation of proceedings to form an EIFD within City boundaries. Subsequently, on April 23, 2019 the County Board of Supervisors approved their resolution to participate in the Placentia EIFD and PFA. In addition, on May 21, 2019 the City Council approved Resolution No. R-2019-23, A Resolution to establish the membership of the Placentia EIFD PFA.

On June 18, 2019, the Placentia City Council and in accordance with EIFD law, adopted Resolution No. R-2019-28 approving the Infrastructure Financing Plan ("IFP") for the EIFD. The IFP specifically defines the boundaries of the EIFD, identifies the public infrastructure improvements, and the financial analysis of expected tax increment over the life of the EIFD to allow for the issuance of bonds to pay for the identified public infrastructure improvements.

3.a.

April 18, 2023

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 2 of 5 ends

However, a nascent EIFD bond market, the COVID pandemic, inflation, and related current economic conditions have contributed to delayed EIFD implementation and cost increases.

Specifically, the Old Town Streetscape Master Plan cost estimates have increased from approximately $8 million to $10.05 million, an increase of 25.6%. In addition, interest rates have risen, increasing cost of debt service, particularly to a "first-time" debt issuer, such as the Placentia EIFD. As a result, the existing financing structure approved by the City Council on June 18, 2019 will not facilitate private investment and will fall short of expected rate of Tax Increment (TI) growth.

Subsequently, an amendment to the Infrastructure Financing Plan ("IFP") for the EIFD is needed.

This item tonight describes the proposed amendment to the IFP and Staff is seeking City Council direction on the proposed IFP amendment.

STRATEGIC PLAN STATEMENT:

This item is consistent with the City Council approved 5 -Year Strategic Goal to Promote Community and Economic Development, under Objective #3.4, which is to Complete Financing Structure for Old Town EIFD.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council take the following action:

1. Review the Staff presentation on the proposed EFID IFP amendments; and

2. Ask any questions of Staff and the Financial Advisory Team; and

3. Approve in concept the proposed EFID IFP amendments and direct the City Administrator to bring forth the final proposed IFP amendments necessary to fulfill the revised EIFD plan.

DISCUSSION:

In response to the elimination of redevelopment agencies, California Senate Bill 628, effective January 1, 2015, and California Assembly Bill 313, effective January 1, 2016, authorized the formation of EIFDs, which are public financing instruments designed to succeed the former Redevelopment Agency financing mechanism and provide more flexibility than IFDs. An EIFD is a governmental entity, separate and distinct from the city or County that establishes it and is governedby a PFA that is comprised of one or more members from the participating EIFD parties.

EIFDs can aid local government entities in funding public capital facilities, or other specified projects of communitywide significance, primarily by capturing TI generated within the district. The primary source of revenue available to an EIFD, like a Redevelopment project area, is TI.

Essentially, the added improvements gained through EIFD funding would conceptually support future development and result in increased property values, which would generate increased property tax revenues from the base year (established from the most recent equalized tax roll prior to district formation). The increased revenue can then be leveraged for additional improvements through the issuance of bonds and/or applied to fund improvements on a "pay-as- you-go" basis from the date of formation.

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 3 of 5 ends

Unlike Redevelopment, other affected taxing entities are not required to forgo their TI for the district; participation is voluntary. Each tax sharing entity that chooses to join an EIFD has the option to allocate up to 100% of its portion of TI to the district. Under the EIFD law, school districts are precluded from participation.

EIFDs provide an opportunity for agencies to issue bonds for an array of public infrastructure projects as well as supporting economic development efforts in specific areas. The area of particular interest to Placentia is the infrastructure needed in and around the newly established Old Town Placentia Revitalization Plan. This area will require a significant investment of infrastructure in order to attract developers to the area while improving the City's housing stock and retail opportunities for the public. Land use designations in the area include residential, commercial, industrial, open space and parks. The area contains over 300 acres, which is approximately 7.1% of the City's total 4,243 acres.

However, a nascent EIFD bond market, the COVID pandemic, inflation, and related current economic conditions have contributed to delayed EIFD implementation and cost increases.

Specifically, the Old Town Streetscape Master Plan cost estimates have increased from approximately $8 million to $10.05 million, an increase of 25.6%. In addition, interest rates have risen, increasing cost of debt service, particularly to "first-time" debt issuer, such as the Placentia EIFD. As a result, the existing financing structure approved by the City Council on June 18, 2019 will not facilitate private investment and will fall short of expected rate of Tax Increment (TI) growth.

Subsequently, an amendment to the Infrastructure Financing Plan ("IFP") for the EIFD is needed.

This item tonight describes the proposed amendment to the IFP and will be a receive and file. A subsequent date will be scheduled for formal approval of the IFP amendment.

The amendments being discussed by City and County staff would generate the required estimated $10 million (net of debt issuance and interest costs) to completely fund the infrastructure outlined within the Old Town Streetscape Master Plan previously adopted by the City Council in 2017 at one time (instead of in phases), which will better induce private investment to fulfil Tax Increment ("TI") and economic benefit projections. This will also accelerate the City's timetable to meet regional housing needs, including affordable housing. Finally, construction of public funds in one phase will ultimately save the EIFD on construction costs.

Infrastructure Financing Plan
The Infrastructure Financing Plan ("IFP") prepared by Kosmont Companies ("Kosmont") for the Placentia EIFD includes tax increment revenue projections, a cap on the maximum tax increment revenue to be contributed to the EIFD by both the City and the County, bond authorization, a description of proposed facilities to be funded, a finding of communitywide significance, and a statement of the goals of the EIFD. The PFA is ultimately responsible for preparation and final adoption of an IFP for the Placentia EIFD, and the IFP is a proposal that will be provided for the

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 4 of 5 ends

PFA to consider. As a participating taxing entity of the Placentia EIFD, the County Board of Supervisors will also have an opportunity to review and approve the IFP at an upcoming meeting.

Proiected Tax Increment Updates
Kosmont prepared a tax increment analysis to determine district revenue potential based upon planned projects and future development potential. Based on this analysis, the City's contribution is capped at 50% of its share of property tax increment (-6.8 out of 13.6 cents on the dollar) within the district boundary for a maximum of $24,000,000 total over the approximately 40 -year district lifetime (estimated range of actual allocation is $17 to $24 million, depending primarily on interest rates). The County's contribution is similarly capped at 50% of its share (-2.95 out of 5.9 cents) within the district boundary for a maximum of $3,547,000 total over the first 25 years of the district's lifetime, with an option to extend to 30 years, only if needed. Both the City and County allocations would terminate sooner if project funding goals were achieved sooner than projected.

While the Placentia area would benefit from a new dedicated revenue source for infrastructure improvements, formation of the Placentia EIFD would result in a reallocation of property tax TI revenue from the City's General Fund. Once the Placentia EIFD terminates, TI revenue would no longer be allocated to the Placentia EIFD and will flow back into the City's General Fund.

Preliminary Bonded Indebtedness
Kosmont Financial Services provided a preliminary bonded indebtedness analysis with County's participation and estimated EIFD revenues. The structure of the analysis is a City -issued 30 -year lease revenue bond of approximately $10.5 million to net approximately $10.05 million in net proceeds. A total of approximately $19.1 million (principal and interest) would be repaid over 30 years with an average annual payment of approximately $676,000. The proposed IFP amendment would allow for up to 40 years to provide additional time for EIFD tax increment revenues to pay back debt service costs.

Financial Implication of Establishing Placentia EIFD
Kosmont concluded several regional financial implications for the establishment of the Placentia EIFD, including providing essential regional transportation infrastructure improvements, improved regional competitiveness for federal/state grant funds and support of the County's Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (e.g., job creation, quality of life improvement, promote environmental sustainability). Locally, based on the Kosmont gross economic impact analysis, approximately 5,024 construction jobs will be created, 1,178 permanent jobs will be created, $695 million in economic output from construction, and $196 million in annual ongoing economic output.

Implementation of the Placentia EIFD is forecasted to create an acceleration of development and related fiscal revenues in the amount of approximately $59 million in net fiscal impact to the City and $50 million in net fiscal benefit to the County (present value net fiscal benefit over 50 years).

FISCAL IMPACT:

As described above, preliminarily, it is projected that approximately $10.05 million could be generated in net bond proceeds utilizing City and County tax increment revenues over the approximately 40 -year term of the Placentia EIFD to help fund core public infrastructure needed to support Placentia's growth. The City's contribution is capped at 50% of its share of property tax increment (-6.8 out of 13.6 cents on the dollar) within the district boundary for a maximum of

City Council Agenda
April 18, 2023

Page 5 of 5 ends

$24,000,000 total over the approximately 40 -year district lifetime (estimated range of actual allocation is $17 to $24 million, depending primarily on interest rates). The County's contribution is capped at 50% of its share (-2.95 out of 5.9 cents) within the district boundary for a maximum of $3,547,000 total over the first 25 years district lifetime, with an option to extend to 30 years only if needed. Both the City and County allocations would terminate sooner if project funding goals are achieved sooner than projected.

The recommended debt insurance structure is for the City to loan $1 million in General Fund reserves to accelerate Project financing which would reduce bond issues size, debt service, improve security and reduce the bond interest rate. In this proposed structure, the City would take the lead and issue its own 30 -year lease revenue bonds ("LRBs") in lieu of the PFA. The City would provide property/building collateral for underlying LRB lease in this structure.

While the Placentia area would benefit from the infrastructure improvements, the formation of the EIFD would result in a reallocation of TI (i.e., the City's share of taxes levied on property within the district boundaries on that portion of the taxable valuation over and above the taxable valuation of the base year property tax roll) from the General Fund to pay for the Placentia infrastructure improvements.

The aforementioned TI projections are based upon various assumptions made utilizing the future growth potential of the residential, commercial, and industrial development sectors in the area.

Once the EIFD has terminated, the property tax increment revenue allocated to the EIFD will flow back into the City's General Fund. The property tax generated up to the taxable valuation of the base year tax roll will continue to flow to the City's General Fund.

Prepa
Jeannette Orteg
Assistant to the City Administrator/
Economic Development Manager
Reviewed and approved:
rcein
Jennifer Lampman� —
Reviewed
Joseph M. Lambert
Director of Development Services
ff2 ,
-Reviewed and ap
Damien R. Arrula
Finance Director City Administrator
Attachment:

PowerPoint Presentation

Placentia Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) Proposed Amendments

PLACENTIA
Rich Heritage, Bright Future

CITY OF PLACENTIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
APRIL 18, 2023
ko smon
financial services
1601 N. Sepulveda Blvd., #382
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
TEL: 424-297-1070 1 URL: www.KosmontFinancial.com

BACKGROUND: FIRST CITY/COUNTY EIFD IN THE STATE
■ In 2019, the City of Placentia (City) and County of Orange (County) established the Placentia Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) to fund infrastructure improvements within the City's Old Town and Packinghouse District to facilitate transit -oriented development (TOD) of regional significance ■ Base year is 2020-2021; —$73,000 in increment collected ■ A nascent EIFD bond market, the COVID pandemic, inflation, and related current economic conditions have contributed to delayed EIFD implementation and cost increases Original Streetscape Project cost estimate of -$8 million is now $10.05 million, an increase of 25.6% Interest rates have risen, increasing cost of debt service (particularly to "first-time" debt issuer) Impact: Multiple debt issuances over 7-8 years would be needed to fund key projects (only $3-5M available up -front) ■ Goal: Install all aspects of the Old Town Streetscape Master Plan at one time (instead of in phases), which will:

Better induce private investment to fulfil Tax Increment ("TI") and economic benefit projections Accelerate timetable to meet regional housing needs, including affordable housing Save the EIFD on construction costs
■ Existing financing structure will not facilitate private investment and will fall short of expected rate of TI growth kosmon
financial scniccs
Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate

RECAP OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF)
Assessed
Property Value
(A/V) within TIF
District
Boundaries
$600M
$500M
$400M
$300M
$200.
$100M///r
Period of New
Development
$OM
0 Note: Illustrative
kosmon
financial services
5 4141; 44 ; ► .
rrf
f r
,,,fes///I /74F ` frf; /
New Property Value from
4 . New Development / Rehabilitation • �.
/; Available to TIF District;
_moi •'sar••aavr•••••••••ar••.• 4. iifaa4L 4eraaert•r411rra;riae6.6ri. �f\ ; e•• r/41.iis a-•-•• fof 410/.
10 15 20 25
30 35
40 45
50 55
Years from District Formation
Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate 3 Long Term
Districts
Governance
Approvals
Non-contiguous
Areas

EIFD FUNDAMENTALS
Eligible
Projects
45 years from first bond issuance
Public Financing Authority (PFA) implements Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP)A Mandatory public hearings for formation with protest opportunity; no public vot 7 EIFD project areas do not have to be contiguous
ii
Any property with useful life of 15+ years & of communitywide significance; purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, seismic retrofit, rehabilitation, and maintenance kosmon
financial services
Does NOT increase property taxes
Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate 4 PLACENTIA

EIFD MAP
300+ ACRES
j
Proposed
Metrolink Station
TOD P g House
11111.11111111
ti
trLegend
Placentia City Boundary
In EIFD Sul -Aree 1
EIFD Sub -Area 2
▪ EIFD Sub -Area 3
F-1 EIFD Sub-Aree 4
EIFD Sub -Area 5
▪ EIFD Sub -Area 6
EIFD Sub -Area 7
Parcel Lines Within Placentia
Kosmont Financial Services
1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate
5 EXAMPLE EXISTING CONDITIONS VS.

POTENTIAL NEW DEVELOPM NT
• EIFD will fund Streetscape Master Plan
improvements serving the properties of the EIFD
• Will incentivize $460M+ expected in new
development assessed value from residential,
commercial, and hotel development
• Reduce traffic on 91 Freeway
kosmon
financial sCrvices
Kosmont Financial Services
1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate
6 ESTIMATED ECONOMIC BENEFITS AT STAKE
UPDATED ANALYSIS JANUARY 2023
■ 1,600+ housing units
■ 5,024 construction jobs and 1,178 permanent jobs (direct, indirect, and induced)
■ $695 million in economic output from construction and $196 million in annual ongoing economic output (direct, indirect, and induced) ■ $59M in positive net fiscal impact to City general fund over 50 years ■ $50M in positive net fiscal impact to County general fund over 50 years ■ Greenhouse gas reduction/vehicle miles traveled reduction; improved and convenient transit to local universities and other destinations kosmon
financial scniccs
Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate 3 PROPOSED EIFD IFP AMENDMENTS
a) Recalibrate duration (term) of TI allocation to reflect full payment of contributions — Increase City maximum term from 20 to 40 years
• Could end earlier if interest rates level out prior to bond issuance — Increase County maximum term from 20 to 25 years, with option to extend to 30 only if needed • Provides adequate time for County to contribute its full share of TI (i.e., $3.547 million) • Additional 5 years only triggered if TI receipt levels perform worse than suboptimal projections — EIFD to terminate upon extinguishment of all EIFD debt, even if repaid early b) Increase City's maximum dollar allocation from $9,100,000 in tax increment up to $24,000,000 in increment (more likely $17-19M over 33-35 years needed), could be as low as $12M over 30 years in best -case interest rate scenarios
— Amount projected to enable full repayment of various financing structures evaluated, even under severely adverse issuance conditions
c) Limitation / focus on use of funds: EIFD TI limited to repayment of IFP projects costs & associated debt; xcess amount would flow to General Fund
kosmon
financial scrviccs
Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate

SUMMARY OF CASHFLOW PROJECTIONS
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO T1 ALLOCATION/COLLECTION

PARAMETERS

STRUCTURE
REPAY
CITY
$AMT.

UN -REPAID
CITY
"EFFECTIVE"
TI COLL.

CAP
COUNTY
TI COLL.

CAP
COUNTY
YRS.

NEEDED
Proposed Amendments
Original TI Estimates, Market as of Jan '23
33y
n/a
$17.443MM*
$3.547MM
20 Proposed Amendments
Original TI Estimates, +50bps
34y
n/a
$18.926MM* $3.547MM
20 Proposed Amendments
Original TI Estimates, +100bps
36y n/a $20.475MM* $3.547MM 20
Proposed Amendments
Original TI Estimates, +150bps
38y n/a $22.707MM* $3.547MM 20
Proposed Amendments
Original TI Estimates, +200bps
39y n/a $23.783MM* $3.547MM 20
kosmon
financial scniccs
*Estimated; assumes excess TI is sequestered or refunded for cap credit while LRBs are outstanding Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate 9 SUMMARY OF CASHFLOW PROJECTIONS
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO T1 ALLOCATION/COLLECTION

PARAMETERS

STRUCTURE
REPAY
CITY
$AMT.

UN -REPAID*
CITY
"EFFECTIVE"
TI COLL.

CAP**
COUNTY
TI COLL.

CAP
COUNTY
YRS.

NEEDED
Proposed Amendments
Suboptimal TI Estimates, Market as of Jan
'23
39y
$0
$18.535MM
$3.547MM
25 Proposed Amendments
Suboptimal TI Estimates, +50bps
41y $0.617MM $20.168MM $3.547MM 25
Proposed Amendments
Suboptimal TI Estimates, +100bps
43y $2.236MM $21.864MM $3.547MM 25
Proposed Amendments
Suboptimal TI Estimates, +150bps
45y $3.960MM $23.658MM $3.547MM 25
Proposed Amendment
Suboptim lllas i
E mates, +200bps
>45y $5.679MM $24.090MM $3.547MM 25
*Estimated; assumes excess TI is sequestered or refunded for cap credit while LRBs are outstanding kosmon Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate 1 10 firumcial w —,

RECOMMENDED DEBT ISSUANCE STRUCTURE

TO IMPLEMENT NECESSARY CHANGES
• City to loan $1M from reserves to EIFD to accelerate Project financing (reduces bond issue size, debt service, improves security)
• City to issue its own 30 -year lease revenue bonds ("LRBs") (in lieu of EIFD) — City would provide property/building collateral for underlying LRB lease in this scenario — To further ensure security, City General Fund would be available to loan monies to EIFD in the unlikely event of an insufficient TI scenario
• Potential benefits include:
— City LRBs should qualify for bond insurance, producing lower interest rates and no need for a cash - funded debt service reserve fund
Able to raise $6.4 million more in proceeds; $1.2 million in interest savings if sizing were the same Eliminates need for a Capitalized Interest fund to carry LRB interest payments while TI grows Eliminates need to provide "debt service coverage", enabling more bond proceeds to be raised up front Loan provided to EIFD would accrue interest to City General Fund at City's LAIF rate (2.07% as of Q4 2022)
kosmoKosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate I fim�wial1-Ls

RETURN ON INVESTMENT
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
kosmon
financial services
Annual Net New Fiscal Revenue to City and County General Funds increased property tax to City General Fund
i General Fund
County EIFD Allocation Cap Reached;
increased property tax to General Fund
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate $59M in positive
net fiscal impact
to City general
fund over 50
years
12 MARKET MOMENTUM
• Placentia has demonstrated ability
to attract high-quality private
sector investment (e.g., Herald
sale at OC record $605k/unit)
• Purpose of accelerating EIFD
Streetscape improvements is to
take advantage of market
momentum, catalyze further
growth, then capture value via
EIFD in turn
• Current investment marketplace is
very selective; public investment
can accelerate interest
kosmon
financial scriccs
p puq q.}n.NPrEPS A1.44
Na, eJIt
Placentia's Transit Development Dreams Take Shape
SISO Mslliou, 418.1kiit Project
,r4.11.1, plea M.Glnm
11r1 ixd
Breaks Grout! 2021 141.44 .,ter z... r r-xiar .nom •.h.

Ma wf re.ra, i.r.Iwari .m m.•I,.....n
Iparn.ap aaneoar ]luvpwe lay
Y'. Owe pia., ix. AMC ayua. iM .•t
nrnamd ,L akam.. wish i.r.n.m, a• i
a uxu•r cwnr mivaalw[
■ Ill Kalif auntie
tic airy r A-cr. he. — k.R-aK to
neriiii s M.. Tr.& tar as
arr.ed-xr ik.dymne iv. I.rfnnmiemn
Lyon Living Sells New Placentia
Apartments for $130M
Lnl ...a.
.Lr I. AO rA
/194
mr u...f esya,wa r reef gleed. 1,
W..P.A„..d.rl.F [u..i.aw aa..wr.ar ac.•• noraax.lama ■ `.a. .w...M.+emebb Of
• ccialfne.p plumed
axialSt in ,^ slew
.. SMdAd per pYr.rd rmW win Inffla
▪ Tie
alM1Oe.drer dr Mr L,rNr
tsak.adeR. nynfiedaecip n.a
•- b 144,0 in - a e%•1 d:..n
.[m peri el Nei. Ounce
Pketmy
arc dri4anpaemnmplMgevaN.'Ya
ciipinct
• '^.i YAe dr rarp rh• rip n h.y,gl
nb' adrtJhr.ro:ulink
aCa.p.r,t..r..-
.calm.Q.w
. a> Fax.
.0n aalare fuer. Memel
Aimee nd par! NIA w 9.... naxn
PE c21SwaVu• goJe,
pnNbknowed xw..1Ir1cairnMn•
Merar
d Mll.Yl lir li1101
MI NY.. Jarman temen mwsw I.an
dna eem.aar Oa.r a mini P'l.`%
a read.ehuw
4•1nree3 xrximy'Lrilx•xX .,kc
with maiden...mrd , IrlaAx.n.
cud .1 I�.e �nr.M:eme. in 2,41,.
nerd de lme. ave awyr l n.dn•marar
MAW. unIraia ul In nn.[adar of dr
ne
• are dcmali•Lal •! make wn /a The
• .!fr• •
•Hfeclna,d Idn d eiar
vnl ,:i,. sol .cxr
n.. in41h1.14
:Hxld lad !! : bran,' p.m. CAM
aie
!fawn. l.rynal
X'An
de a :he Na fro lcua lur
Iapad nxnk.n,Mmk Kurnaci aa. n,'y rrr
1 quo lqucl Hmrr 41, ter vn.n. W
f1.�.�•il •.a...;..wl rola anml••fM
Ir Placentia
rry
r.

PbMi. he Nhrr Ara an,. ire im-.

11.I'eny.l.;,re !n II
av eYr.�w.e .a. im.
�r amsrni rin,c, LSI lir
Re•nn Irrlral r'an.uaYY+ Ind al mII
Ihfq
the Pic r. -..p..1 ac.:iha.x dcr:kw.
mod. ie.a•.rihr my i i aI.7 bra c
GIA Clap Len. aei .nl$ For N., minion
1Ufire.wIr - mill]assXx
and iwlnlrr..n.nla averaprp
h'a !um n •ex xill a p. Ran No
��i SYury de. thx ey ...flan nen
�• wOisew. a a�
NVa � I lilac flims
Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate 'The alp. i, era3.,.r+rpgdc.
r crawl.'... eon•k ail
Ww rJn.i .eaaa,1 dewkccin,a alms
'1n.5r MS,. POI. a milt ...h Abe
inraxan, rf ik.ia.,..k 11a4[Marge
[5'n
arc,al •.
1� ae nr•ny,IMn. far abe.r l34.a
nI be pun...0 !rain ... ll &athwart rt
mm�r i.ilN ranirca 4•alxve I
-{,r-nq..mh.. ,• huilley mar the
frraamlydney.r new ranul.xt1 Fe
Sl a e...•. or alma SIM par `9us• awn.
aNmrxsanical inainul hdlin6. ra.,,n,
Mat,, tinny 110S,1•1 ,111 Sof 5e na:hu,,.
elan llW pn yore•1...4Y
1 13

• Construction costs and interest rates have risen significantly since EIFD was originally formed • Building public improvements over multiple years/phases will not likely entice private sector investment sufficiently to fulfill original economic development goals and will delay increase to assessed valuation • Construction of public improvements in one phase is key to incentivizing timely private investment to revitalize and improve the City's Old Town and Packinghouse Districts and fulfill AV goals • Amendment will result in -$10M in proceeds to fulfill completion of project • EIFD bond market is new, and the Placentia EIFD specifically has no credit history as a new issuer - Successful implementation of full project more likely with City financing support via LRB • City staff and County staff have met multiple times to work out a mutually beneficial set of amendments to adapt to current economic circumstances while maintaining goals - County staff have agreed to extend their term, amenable to extending further if needed koson
fim�ncial scniccs
Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate

NEXT STEPS
Target Date
1 Task
Today / April 18,
2023
April 2023
May 2023
June 2023
June 2023
July 2023
August 2023
Q2 -Q4 2023
Q2 2024
kosmon
limancial services
a) City Council consideration and approval of Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) amendment terms
b) Award of EIFD Streetscape Master Plan design and engineering contract c) Prepare noticing and hold initial Public Financing Authority (PFA) public meeting to present revised IFP
d) Prepare noticing and hold first PFA public hearing on revised IFP e) Independent City Council and County BOS consideration of approval of revised IFP f) Prepare noticing and hold second PFA public hearing on revised IFP (also present Annual Report to PFA)
g) Prepare noticing and hold third PFA public hearing on revised IFP h) Prepare materials to solicit construction bids on EIFD Streetscape Master Plan i) Prepare debt issuance / enter bond markets
Kosmont Financial Services 1 Proprietary Do Not Duplicate 1 11

THANK YOU -QUESTIONS?
1 LA E N `l' IA
Rich Heritage, Bright Future
kosmon
financial services
1601 N. Sepulveda Blvd., #382
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
TEL: 424-297-1070 1 URL: www.KosmontFinancial.com
Kosmont Transactions Services, Inc., doing business
as Kosmont Financial Services (KFS) is an
Independent Registered Municipal Advisor with the
SEC and the MSRB. KFS does not provide accounting,
tax or legal advice. Information included in this
presentation is provided for discussion purposes only
and should not be construed as advice under any
circumstance. Such information reflects KFS's views as
of the date hereof (unless otherwise noted) and is
subject to change without notice. Any terms and

Placentia City CouncilApril 18, 2023

Placentia City Council
April 18, 2023