MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR STORM WATER PUMP STATIONS
BIDDER'S BOND
(To Accompany Contract Proposal)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,
That r:'J't14; (7 (;, pi's , as PRINCIPAL, and
, as SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Placentia in the sum of TEN PERCENT (10%) of the total amount of the bid of said PRINCIPAL, to be paid to the said City or its certain attorney, its successors and assigns; for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors or assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
In no case shall the liability of said SURETY here under exceed the sum of
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT,
WHEREAS, said PRINCIPAL has submitted the above-mentioned bid to the City of Placentia for certain construction for which bids are to be submitted via Planet Bids on August 31, 2023, for:
MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR STORM WATER PUMP STATIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, if the aforesaid PRINCIPAL is awarded the contract and within the time and manner required under the specifications, after the prescribed forms are presented to him for signature, enters into a written consent in the prescribed form in accordance with the bid, and files the two bonds with the City of Placentia, one to guarantee faithful performance and the other to guarantee payment for Labor and Materials as required by law, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. In the event suit is brought upon this bond by the Obligee and judgment is recovered, said SURETY shall pay all costs incurred by the Obligee in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals on this ^: J� Day of .(1v,A,i L 2023.
PRINCI L!
i
BY: /f `7/�/�--
Title
BY:
SURETY
Address
Title
(SEAL) (SEAL)
Instructions: If the Contractor is a corporation, the agreement must be executed in the corporate name and signed by the President or Vice President and the Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal affixed. If the Contractor is an individual doing business under a fictitious name, it must be signed by all persons having an interest in the business, and the fictitious name must be signed also. All bond signatures must be notarized. The standard printed bid bond form of any bonding company approved by the City pursuant to Item 7, "insurance Policies and Bonds", in the Instructions to Bidders may be used in lieu of the foregoing approved sample bond form provided the security stipulations protecting the City are in any way reduced by use of the surety company's standard printed form. •
STATE OF `7C%r1;C�
County of t/'Y7alc
On this ;,:73-11\ day of 0 , 2023, A.D.
7 personally appeared before me a
(Notary Public, Judgesor'Other Officer) n n
in and for County, State of L , s rn'+
known to me to be the 1-1'i' of the corporation that
executed the foregoing instrument and, upon oath, did depose that he is the officer of said corporation as above designed; that he is acquainted with the seal of said corporate seal of said corporation; that the signatures to said instrument were made by officers of said corporation as indicated after said signatures; and that the said corporation executed the said instrument freely and voluntarily and for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
BID BOND
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SURETY
ss
e
(Notary Public, J,dge or Other Officeri)
EMILY R, HARTUNG
Notary Public - California
Orange County
Commission; 2391785 [
My Comm. Expires Jan 26, 2026
ACCoRIE) DATE (MMIDDIYYYY)
AC� CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 9/19/2023
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER I CONTACT Luis Schaeffer
NAME:
Luis Schaeffer Ins Services I PH Nr o. EExt 661-609-9892 aC. No): 866-859-7592 PO Box 1032 E-MAIL SS: [email protected]
Lancaster
INSURED
CA 93584
Axis Mechanical Services
1100 E Arlee PI
Anaheim CA 92805
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER A : Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.
INSURER B : Infinity Auto Insurance Company
1 INSURER C : Nautilus Insurance Company
1 INSURER D : Technology Insurance Company, Inc
1 INSURER E :
1 INSURER F :
NAIC #
23140
20260
17370
42376
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP
LTR INSD wvn POLICY NUMBER (MMIDD/YYYY) IMM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS A
B
X
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CLAIMS -MADE
X
OCCUR
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
POLICY
X
PRO-
JECT
OTHER:
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
OWNED
AUTOS ONLY
X HIRED
AUTOS ONLY
C X
D
UMBRELLA LIAB
SCHEDULED
AUTOS
NON -OWNED
AUTOS ONLY
X
EXCESS LIAB
DED RETENTION $
WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBEREXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
X AES1217367-01
X
OCCUR
CLAIMS -MADE X
Y/N
N/A
Y
504610029571001
AN1274664
TWC4293628
EACH OCCURRENCE
DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence)
MED EXP (Any one person)
12/28/2022 12/28/2023 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
GENERAL AGGREGATE
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
04/12/2023 04/12/2024
12/28/2022 12/28/2023
07/07/2023 07/07/2024
$ 1,000,000
$ 100,000
$ 5,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $
(Ea accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
EACH OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE
1,000,000
4,000,000
X PER OTH-
STATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) "The City of Placentia and its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the Consultant." are listed as additional insured with respect to General Liability per endorsement CG 2010 07 04 attached.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
City of Placentia
401 E. Chapman Ave.
Placentia
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
CA 92870 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(LOA
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
POLICY NUMBER: AES1217367 01 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 07 04
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON OR
ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Person(s)
Or Organization(s): Location(s) Of Covered Operations
All persons or organizations where required by Any location were you perform work for such written contract with the Named Insured additional insured Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.
A. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to sions apply:
include as an additional insured the person(s) or This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only
with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property "property damage" occurring after:
damage" or "personal and advertising injury" 1. All work, including materials, parts or equip - caused, in whole or in part, by: ment furnished in connection with such work, on
1. Your acts or omissions; or the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the
2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your additional insured(s) at the location of the behalf; covered operations has been completed; or
in the performance of your ongoing operations for
the additional insured(s) at the location(s) desig-
nated above.
B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following additional exclu-
CG 20 10 07 04
2. That portion of "your work" out of which the
injury or damage arises has been put to its in-
tended use by any person or organization other
than another contractor or subcontractor en-
gaged in performing operations for a principal
as a part of the same project.
© ISO Properties, Inc., 2004 Page 1 of 1 ❑
TO:
CITY COUNCIL
VIA: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2023
SUBJECT: SECOND STUDY SESSION TO REVIEW CHAPMAN CORRIDOR
REVITALIZATION PLAN PROGRESS
Placentia City Council
AGENDA REPORT
FISCAL
IMPACT: No fiscal impacts are associated with this Study Session. Potential significant economic benefit to the local Placentia economy, including jobs, public & private investment, and annual/one-time revenue.
SUMMARY:
On October 1, 2019, City Council adopted the comprehensive General Plan Update. This update included all Elements of the General Plan except the Housing Element, which was adopted as part of the required 6th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocations in March 2022, which is in the process of State certification. The Land Use Element of the 2019 General Plan strongly encourages enhancements and improvements to the visual image, physical design characteristics, economic vitality and infrastructure of the Chapman corridor. City Council previously authorized Placeworks, Inc. (Placeworks) to complete the Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan document and supporting environmental documentation furthering the goals of the General Plan. On February 7, 2023, City Council conducted the first Study Session related to the Chapman Corridor Plan and provided direction on several key policies to move the effort forward. At this time, City Staff and Placeworks will present the progress made since February and will present additional policy questions to City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Receive and file the Staff Report and presentation; and
2. Solicit public comments (if any) regarding the proposed Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan and supporting documentation; and
3. Provide direction to Staff as appropriate regarding the proposed Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan.
3.a.
Oct. 3, 2023
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2023
STRATEGIC PLAN STATEMENT:
This item is consistent with the City Council approved 5 -Year Strategic Goal to:
Promote Community and Economic Development, as Objective Number 3.5 is to Initiate the Chapman Corridor Specific Plan and Objective Number 3.6 is to create design review guidelines and procedures. This agenda item will specifically result in creation of the Chapman Corridor Specific Plan (or equal Zoning document) and will also create design review guidelines specific to the Chapman Corridor.
BACKGROUND:
The General Plan is the City's land use constitution, a legal policy document that is mandated to exist by the State of California. The General Plan is intended to reflect the community's values and set policies to guide in the development, maintenance, and use of the City's built environment.
It forms the basis for future decision making as it relates to the mandatory and optional Elements of the General Plan. The Land Use Element is one of seven mandatory General Plan Elements required by the State of California. On October 1, 2019, City Council adopted the comprehensive General Plan Update, which included an updated Land Use Element. The Land Use Element of the 2019 General Plan strongly encourages enhancements and improvements to the visual image, physical design characteristics, economic vitality and infrastructure of the Chapman Corridor and other major corridors as indicated in the subsequent paragraphs. • Goal LU -1 states: Provide a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial, industrial and open space/recreation uses, while providing adequate community services to City residents. Policy LU -1.10 further states:
Create specific zoning or plans for major corridors within the City. This would include the Chapman Avenue corridor and the Placentia Avenue corridor, among other major thoroughfares.
• Goal LU -3 states: Revitalize underutilized, abandoned or dilapidated commercial, industrial and residential uses and properties. Policy LU -3.1 furthers this goal by stating: Encourage opportunities for redevelopment and improvements in the Old Town area, the TOD district, industrial areas, neighborhoods in the southern sector of the City, and commercial centers along major roadway corridors.
• Goal LU -5 states: Improve urban design in Placentia to ensure that development is both architecturally attractive and functionally compatible and to create identifiable neighborhoods, and community areas. Policy LU -6.6 furthers this goal by stating: Improve urban design in Placentia to ensure that development is both architecturally attractive and functionally compatible and to create identifiable neighborhoods, and community areas.
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2023
• Goal LU -6 states: Enhance and improve the visual image, economic vitality and infrastructure of the Old Town area, TOD, and surrounding areas, like the future Chapman corridor. Policy LU -6.6 furthers this goal by stating: Focus planning and economic development efforts to spur development and infrastructure improvement on major transportation corridors, such as the future Chapman Avenue corridor. • Goal LU -10 states: Create enhanced connectivity with California State University Fullerton (CSUF) campus community. Policy LU -10.2 furthers this goal by stating: In creating the aforementioned corridor plans, the City shall take into consideration the nearby Cal State University Fullerton campus community and capitalize on its proximity.
In October 2022, City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Placeworks to draft the Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan document and supporting environmental documentation furthering the aforementioned goals of the General Plan. Subsequent or concurrent with approval of the corridor plan document, staff anticipates the adoption of a Chapman Corridor Streetscape Master Plan.
On February 7, 2023, City Council conducted the first Study Session related to the Chapman Corridor Plan and provided direction on several key policies to move the effort forward. The first set of policy questions were related to the corridor boundaries. The second set of policy questions were related to land use and site testing, including: 1. What does council envision for the future of Chapman Corridor?, 2. What are key objectives for Chapman Corridor?, and 3. What mobility options should be considered for Chapman Avenue and connections to OId Town and the future Metrolink Station? The third set of policy questions were related to additional uses and mobility (transportation). Those questions were: 1. What additional uses and or types of development should be explored?, and 2. Which mobility options and connections should this plan prioritize? At this time, City Staff and Placeworks will present the progress made since February and will present additional policy questions to City Council.
DISCUSSION:
The Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan development standards and regulations will foster responsible, progressive and attractive development to meet City Council's goals for the corridor.
Medium-high density mixed-use development will bring new businesses and residents to the Chapman Corridor, and adjacent OId Town Placentia and TOD District, benefiting the traditional downtown with new shoppers and diners.
Another benefit of the Revitalization Plan is to plan for appropriate successor commercial and mixed-use development that will unify the Chapman Corridor from Placentia Avenue to Kraemer Boulevard. Staff envisions that the plan will encourage the consolidation of smaller parcels for new development, providing a catalyst for development, thereby increasing pedestrian activity and revenue to the City in the form of property taxes, sales tax, Transient Occupancy tax and impact fees. This will also result in a more unified aesthetic for the Chapman Corridor, which currently appears aesthetically and visually inconsistent between Placentia Avenue and Kraemer Boulevard.
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2023
Placeworks (with Staff oversight) prepared a presentation (Attachment 1) for City Council review.
The presentation will summarize a review of the project to date, summary of public outreach, proposed land use districts and sub -areas and existing conditions (including land use, urban design, mobility, opportunity areas, mobility considerations, and policy guidance/questions, with next steps. The goal of this Study Session is to receive City Council and public input regarding the following staff recommendations and policy questions:
Staff Recommendations:
- Keep parcels already included in the "Old Town Placentia" Plan out of the Chapman Corridor.
- An amended boundary of the plan on the south side of Chapman between Murray Street and Main Street with an overlay to allow potential new multi -family or mixed-use development.
- Staff recommends no on -street parking on Chapman Avenue between Bradford Avenue and Placentia Avenue.
Policy Questions:
- Is 3 to 4 stories (and possibly 5 stories in some locations) appropriate for the Chapman Corridor?
- Should certain land uses be considered or more strongly encouraged? - Is there concurrence with Staff regarding the land use districts and sub -areas? - Is there concurrence with Staff regarding the omission of street parking? Next Steps
October - January:
• Traffic Counts
• Draft Plan
• Initiate Technical Studies
Spring 2023:
• Conduct an Economic Benefit Analysis (upon completion of land use changes and buildout) • Council approval of Corridor Revitalization Plan, initiate any necessary CEQA studies (final Plan adoption with CEQA certification)
Summer 2023:
• Conduct an Economic Benefit Analysis (upon completion of land use changes and buildout) • Council approval of Corridor Revitalization Plan, initiate any necessary CEQA studies (final Plan adoption with CEQA certification)
Ongoing:
• Community Outreach — through website updates
On A Parallel Track:
• Initiate a Chapman Corridor Streetscape Master Plan
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2023
Prepared by:
Joseph M. ambert
Director of Development Services
Attachment:
PowerPoint Presentation
Reviewed and approved:
Damien R. Arrula
City Administrator
Chapman
Corridpr
Revita
Plan
City Council
Study Session
10/3/2023
Agenda
• Review of Project To -date
• Summary of Outreach
• Proposed Land Uses
• Mobility Considerations
• Policy Guidance/ Questions
• Next Steps
Project Overview
• Kicked off in 2022 to explore options for entitlement and incentives for revitalization along the corridor
• Could result in updated zoning, an overlay, or a specific plan for the area
Mobility Identify and Additional Studies/
Analysis Prioritize Options CEQA
Existing Conditions Stakeholder,
/ Opportunities Property Owner,
and Constraints and Community
Outreach
Land Use Compatibility and Site Testing
Develop the Plan
A
Plan Adoption
Summary of Outreach
Workshop and Survey
• In-person workshop was held March
30, 2023 at the Powell building
adjacent to the CCRP area
• Approximately 20 people in attendance
• On-line survey launched on March
30, 2023
• Remained open until July 10th, 2023
• 86 responses received
CIS:What type of land uses would you like to see? ;Pvlultiple Choice) 65 respondents voted for this option
45 respondents voted for this option
Small Scale Retail
46 respondents voted for this option
34 respondents voted for this option
Workshop - Key Take Aways
Boundary options:
• Do not include the residential area south of Chapman Ave between Murray St and Alta St. • Include the Civic Center.
WHAT TYPES OF USES WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE?
Ideas for Chapman Avenue area:
• Keep the historical residential character of Placentia; • Update shopping and businesses;
• Improve traffic and parking; and
• Consider the needs of retired community members.
Include land uses that allow for:
• Sports complex;
• Small scale retail; and
• Community center.
Buildings along Chapman could be denser:
• 4-5 story mixed use buildings; and
• Commercial/ Retail.
Mobility considerations:
• People drive or walk to the area
• Intersection improvements for vehicles and pedestrians • Corridor is used to get to/from somewhere, passing through ADD A STICKER NEXT TO THE USE THAT YOU WOULD MOST LIKE TO SEE ON CHAPMAN AVE. CHOOSE AS MANY AS YOU LIKE. •
D namic Mixed -Use Civic Center
•
•
•
�II d PFe
I 6i
Mixed -Use Residential
Commercial Servtces
(Barbershop, Laundry Mats)
Other
Cha • man Corridor Revitaiiz
Survey -Key Take Aways
Boundary options:
• Include the residential area south of Chapman
Ave between Murray St and Alta St.
• Include the Civic Center.
Ideas for Chapman Avenue area:
• Update old buildings/ facade improvements
• More restaurants/ dining options and breweries
• More trees
• Fix the fountain
• Include art and new signage
Include land uses that allow for:
• Markets and small grocery;
• Sports complex; and
• Community center.
Buildings along Chapman could be denser:
• 4-5 story mixed use buildings; and
• Commercial/ Retail.
Mobility considerations:
• Widen the street/lanes
• Make it friendly to walk
• Bike lane improvements
• Intersection improvements for vehicles and
pedestrians
11 respondents voted for this option
ediral Services
11 respondents voted for this option
33 respondents voted for this option
Community Center
26 respondents voted for this option
ealthy Grocery Store
29 respondents voted for this option
22 respcnden.s voted fcr this option
Additional Outreach Efforts
• Summer Concerts
• Oldtown Placentia Meetings
• C.A. Weekly Articles
• City Website Spotlight
• Social Media Post
YOU ARE INVITED TO HELP
US PLAN THE FUTURE OF
CHAPMAN AVE!
Take the Online Survey!
1 The City of Placentia has initiated the Chapman
Corridor Revitalization Plan {CCRP)! The goal of
the CCRP is to identify the Chapman Corridor
area as a gateway to the City of Placentia and
to create a vibrant mix of uses to stimulate the
economic and social environment. Revitalizing this
corridor will create an inviting entry that welcomes
residents and visitors while providing a connection
to the adjacent districts and the City's Civic
Center.
Take the Online Survey) Your participation and
input is essential in developing a cam munity
driven plan that reflects our values and the future
of the Chapman Corridor. The survey will take 5 to
10 minutes and will remain active until Saturday,
June 10th, 2023.
Study Area ; Fnai boundaries TBD)
CkApk Na��
z
AUAYI;iM1 sr
Chapman Corridor
Revitalization Plan
.1r Rsr
Take the online survey!
bit.Iv/CcrDSurvev
•
cxzo"
Land Use
Opportunity Areas
. --
6.414 I
uj
!,:t r.
2ki i 1 1r iir
CHAPMANAVEr
1 57
LTJ
r16
a CENTER sT
arc
Opportunity to allow for
residential to remain or
commercial uses such as small
office (i.e. reuse of homes for
law office, dentist, etc.)
Mixed -Use Opportunity Site
Commercial Opportunity Slte
Housing Opportunity Slte
Old Town - Existing Zoning
TOD - Existing Zoning
Civic Center Opportunity Site
+I J d
Civic Center
6-3
ck• ----
NTA
-- NTA FEAV
Future Station Parking
-.:7);;I---;- 1
o1
1 ce
Placentia Lakes Condos
Cinnamon Tree Condos
Future Metrolink Station
Future Affordable Housing
/ i s
•
,E
0.o���ER
Future Affordable Housing
T
-��
Anaheim
Boundary Option #2: Placentia Ave to Kraemer Blvd
CHAPMAN AVE
CENTER sr
I
.:riatir1 J k-
fat Lid
4- r ^X
.
Q �
h
�
Zr 0 Z Q
0 Q
00 SANTA FE AVE
HER PVE
cRO\N-\
Placentia 1
il•!1•III r1
Anaheim
Proposed Boundary - Refined
CHAPAN AVE
ALTA VISTA ST
AEt-UCN LN
t ► c CENTER Sr
=s ► U
IZS UPti
1 )-
cr
0 Q
i'
► 0 Q
CO1
► SANTA FE AVE
W
144
1 •
Placentia
BE =1 ME 1M 1
Anaheim
4-5 Story Residential
r. I . , Li RI ,J,111 "IL
[7.1. EH 71 i; g
i r2b "c
11 L..,---- ---=
111111
I 611 : el
I III
...„. iiiiimil,:4.1 , I lit_
ii.ir. _ .
.... ::
,...........
--..-v; ti. kill! k Pi
.,,._, .....
i.1 .,......:
--..,,,:
. 4 1_ Lric, ___:,
.:.
I
.... . if .. .
p
Commercial / Retail
Mixed -Use Catalytic Project
Angelina Development - Kraemer Land Company
ji t
IS II
4.2.11. �1 1•.
Ibu
ANGELINA
PLACENTIA I CALIFORNIA
COMPANY 1,12.0
oa.e flab,
ANCALIFORNIAELINA VIEW ON SOUTH KRAEMER BVD, AFTER 1 A9.1 oaexn PLACENTIA R KRAEMER LAND COMPANY 1 19-128
DATE 313121
COVER SHEET 1 CS 1
Al 14
VOW
URBAN
ARENA
Civic Center Mixed Use Opportunity Site
La Habra Civic Center - Land Swap
Laguna Niguel "City Center"
PARKING
0 COMMERCIAL
0 IAL
PARKING
FACIAL
CM GARAGE
Z
fiif66ffrifn;
l JI I lillll I.IIII l.I _L� —
\tel 9 6ffffNfififlfKffff9fy ,
rv##fff-
/(///!/ll///%/r////////L SII
IGCENTER
Figure 2-4: Conceptual Land Use Plan, Ground Level
Figure 2-5: Conceptual Land Use Paan, Second Floor
Norwalk Entertain Center -
Developer Led Effort
Proposed - Sub Areas
Al -rt
■
CHA PmA N A vE
1 ■
1 r0 cENTER sr
--(t) u
1�
57 w
0 cC
ALTA VISTA ST
PruiA.J..ie,d Land Use Districts
Gateway West (GW)
Gul'cevui Core (GC)
Gateway East (GE)
Gateway Neighborhood (GN)
1 1
Z0 Z 0
ckr
co
SANTA FEAvE
Lid
PSE
Eva ILLTVi
Mg' aim
St
_t
11 ip .�1� 11 11111 111 11 111
iI_
Placentia
mmEnr=m11.1
Anaheim
Proposed Land Use Plan - Gateway West
ccr
rzls-r
■
or
�r
CHAPMA N AVE r
1 (57)
MaCON( LN
PIA
o j CENTER ST
S.!
I
1 1
r
r
Gateway West (GW)
(SFF) Single Family Flex
■ (CC) Commercial Corridor
(MU) Mixed Use
r
0 z
LEJ
z
ALTA VISTA ST
Lu
1—
G
o z 0 Q
co
SANTA FEAVE
C -\\ER P`
„
Placentia
NEima••I.1
Anaheim
Proposed Land Use Plan - Gateway Core
ccr
-0/
CHA PMA N AVE 1
CF.)
r
1 1
1 ar�
4:b.1'Li
ii,1�
1 �' i_ cr
1 ? z o z o Q
c
LL
�
Gateway Core (GC) �
I I (SFF) Single Family Flex m
IM (MFF) Multi -Family Flex SANTA EEAvE
0 (OS) Open Space Recreation
(MU) Mixed Use
0 z
LEJ
z
Zrit
CENTER sr
—1
w
sz
ALTA VISTA ST
CI,
1 O -\\ER P`
„
"P".'
mmi
I;a;
4 1
1 •
to 00
Placentia
www,==.1.1
Anaheim
Gateway Neighborhood
McLGpY U N
cr
0 crw
0 ct
ALTA VISTA ST
Multi Family Flex?
I
1 Gateway Neighborhood (GN)
= (MU) Mixed -Use
= (MFF) Multi -Family Flex
I I R-2
R-3
— R -G
— PUD -4
CENTER sT
(-,]
W C)i5.0 Z 0
ckr
co
SANTA FE AVE
Placentia
mmEnr=m11.1
Anaheim
Proposed Land Use Plan -Gateway East
►fir
L ►
�1
clf if
CHAPM,q N A vF 1
1 11
1 8
c 0 CENTER ST
SIU
1cL.
ce) 14i Lia
w c--) 1.-1.0
1 z z o a
■ ckr
m
Gateway East (GE) SANTA FE AVE
= (MU -CC) Mixed Use Civic Center
= (MU) Mixed Use
57 t� CO
� w
C
LL)S4'
ALTA VISTA ST
r
■
PSE
I, 1.
~7i
411: 0
__\____•43,0."4,„" 1_, si_111111111 61111111wil nrosilt 1 1
to
Placentia
mmEnimmim1
Anaheim
Proposed Land Use Plan
1 l
►fir
e.
CFI/AP/1414N�[cc}
AVE diteak aws
MeLOV( \-,N
57 1
CENTER sr
Proposed Designations
I (SFF) Single Family Flex
(MFF) Multi Family Flex 32 - 65 du/acCI Id
— (CC) Commercial Corridor Z 0 Li Z 0
m (MU) Mixed Use �� W -- CI
= (MU -CC) Mixed Use Civic Cer ickr
m
I= (OS) Open Space Recreation SANTA FE
Existing Zoning Designations AVS
R-2
R-3
R -G
PUD -4
PSE
Lid CO
� w
C
LL)S4'
ALTA VISTA ST
Placentia
. ME 1M MI1M1
Anaheim
Proposed Designations (new)
Designation
Single Family Flex (SFF)
escriptio
Would allow existing SF to continue, more incentives for adaptive re -use of structure for flexibility of commercial use (i.e. offices in older homes as found in Orange and Fullerton.
Commercial Corridor (CC) Would allow current commercial to continue to operate. May increase density to allow future capacity and development.
Mixed -Use* (MU)
Encourage key parcels for mixed-use. Would also accommodate future catalyst Site (Angelina Development. Allow for height 2-3 stories and 3-4 stories, 5 if certain conditions are met, varies by sub area. Would also allow for a hotel in the Gateway West sub area.
Multi Family Flex (MFF) Would allow for multi -family development between 32 and 65 dwelling units per acre depending on the sub area.
Civic Center Mixed -Use*
Would provide flexibility in uses and standards for future use of the Civic Center.
Allow for height 3-4 stories, 5 if certain conditions are met. *AII Mixed -Use would allow for housing but would not require ground floor commercial, configurations could be vertical or horizontal.
Mobility
Chapman Ave -Existing
ROW East of Bradford Ave
(No Parking)
EN
■t
i
4' 8' 1'
Planting strip Sidewalk
Sidewalk and Building setback may vary
15'
Marrow
Ira
11' 10'
Drive lane
Chapman Ave
Placentia I
Piaza
•
11'
Center tum Fane drive lane
Kraemer
Park
II I'
.4e p.k
a�oqq
`�P �``�d ��k
1;4
15' 1' 7' 10'
&barrow
Sidewalk Planting strip
• •
• Ill
Chapman Ave Options:
East of Bradford
Concept: Bike Lanes (WB)
(WB) (EB) 1
IT••-
1 11 I1
(WB) (EB)
i:-�#-.
Na
=AL
IT
ft.���t M1.t wt +r•}u 511.• M1,prx
Chapman Ave
Placentia
Plaza
Kraemer
Park
II
4e pi•
aa�o4,6Poei�
Ps 4tc
civic
Center
Concept: Auto Oriented
(WB)
•
wLam r• ..Y
(Add Traffic Lane)
(EB)
• All concepts fit within existing ROW
i
MMOJ
1�1
Chapman Ave -Existing
ROW at Kraemer Park
(Parking)
1 1' B' 1'
Sidewalk
AML
13'
Sha rrow
11'
Drive iane
10'
Center turns lane
• •
■' t
wiff„„w
Chapman Ave
10'
❑rive lane
1'1'
Sharrow
Placentia
Plaza
Parking lane Sidewalk
Kraemer
Park
�e p�
a61/4oed et
vsA
4411111111
41MMI
1[111
■
Chapman Ave Options:
At Kraemer Park
Concept: Remove Parking
s
Sidewalk
■■
snarrow
Sidewalk
Chapman Ave
!CAT
gmmmm
mm2gm
A'
W1
Placentia
Piaza
Kraemer
Park
4e p. t
�o`bP ed `ei$
$tO cis P� ��t
Civic
Center
Concept: Bikeshare
(WB) (EB)
.—. ._.
. eY • ■ . .
r64, 11111.
96,
11'
SF row
a 1
prive lana
io•
(y.,ker Luna lane
10'
pine lane
6' H'
Sharma.. Park any lane Sidewalk
Concept: Bus Shelter
(WB) (EB)
Rtio
Mi.
Cipnall i-arsdaheHa,
11'
nme lane
Canker horn kne
pme lane
t
11• 1' $
8har•aw Park,y lane klewalk
_y227311
• All concepts fit within existing ROW; bikeshare and transit shelter may require some of the pedestrian space
Real -World Examples of On -Street Parking
Removed
Rosemead Boulevard, Temple City, C
Before - 4 Lanes + Parking on Both Sides
After - 4 Lanes + Protected Bikeway
Mixed -Use with On -Street Parking Issues
Commonwealth Avenue/Chapman Avenue, Fullerton, CA
Parking on Commonwealth Avenue
No Parking on Chapman Avenue
If bikes are prioritized on Chapman what
routes are appropriate for connections to
other areas of the City?
• Old Town (within Old Town Revitalization
Plan area)
• Bradford Avenue
• Kraemer Boulevard
• Placentia Avenue
• Consider connections to future
Metrolink Station
Mobility
• Intersection improvements will be developed through
traffic study.
• Alternative bike routes to be explored.
• Traffic counts first week of October.
• Trip generation based on approval to move forward with the Proposed Land Use Plan.
Staff Recommendations
• Leave Old Town parcels alone
• Reduce boundary between Murray St & Main St
• Staff recommends addition of flex designations where
appropriate, while allowing underlying zoning to remain • Staff recommends no on -street parking on Chapman from Bradford to the west
• Staff recommends bike lanes on Chapman Avenue
wherever possible (without losing travel lanes) even if westbound only
Discussion
Policy Questions
• Are 3 to 4 stories (and possibly 5) appropriate heights for the Chapman Corridor?
• Are there any other land types of uses should be
considered or more strongly encouraged?
• Do you agree with Staff on
• Proposed Designations?
• Street Parking and Limits?
• Street Design? What types do you prefer?
Next Steps
October -January:
• Traffic Counts
• Draft Plan
• Initiate Technical Studies
Spring 2023:
• Conduct an Economic Benefit Analysis (upon completion of land use changes and buildout)
• Council approval of Corridor Revitalization Plan, initiate any necessary CEQA studies (final Plan adoption with CEQA
certification)
Ongoing:
• Community Outreach -through website updates
On A Parallel Track:
• Initiate a Chapman Corridor Streetscape Master Plan