PO Requisition Packet - Brightly Software -
Asset Essentials Software
Final Audit Report
2023-11-30
Created: 2023-11-28
By: Elsa Robinson ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAwQrvZ6zLr8pwKGXP2rDDAghKzTNUXIni "PO Requisition Packet - Brightly Software - Asset Essentials So ftware" History
Document created by Elsa Robinson ([email protected]) 2023-11-28 - 10:22:28 PM GMT
Document emailed to Luis Estevez ([email protected]) for signature 2023-11-28 - 10:25:21 PM GMT
Email viewed by Luis Estevez ([email protected])
2023-11-29 - 5:52:36 PM GMT
Document e -signed by Luis Estevez ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-11-29 - 5:54:10 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Jennifer Lampman ([email protected]) for signature 2023-11-29 - 5:54:12 PM GMT
Email viewed by Jennifer Lampman ([email protected]) 2023-11-29 - 7:03:26 PM GMT
Document e -signed by Jennifer Lampman ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-11-29 - 7:04:33 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Damien R. Arrula ([email protected]) for signature 2023-11-29 - 7:04:35 PM GMT
Email viewed by Damien R. Arrula ([email protected]) 2023-11-30 - 3:15:28 AM GMT
Document e -signed by Damien R. Arrula ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-11-30 - 3:15:59 AM GMT - Time Source: server Ea Adobe Acrobat Sign
O Agreement completed.
2023-11-30 - 3:15:59 AM GMT
el Adobe Acrobat Sign
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
DATE:
Placentia City Council
CITY COUNCIL
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
ACTING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
JULY 16, 2024
AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF ONE (1) NEW FLEET VEHICLE FOR THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
FISCAL
IMPACT:
SUMMARY:
EXPENSE: $75,236.56 TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE
BUDGETED: $80,000.00 FY 2024-25 CIP BUDGET
$60,000.00 MEASURE U (798509-6842)
$20,000.00 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND (418509-6842)
Annually, the Public Works Department evaluates the City's Fleet and recommends the replacement of existing vehicles and purchase of new ones based on the useful service lives and needs of City operations. As part of the approved Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget, the City Council budgeted funds in the current fiscal year to replace and purchase several new vehicles and equipment within the City's Fleet including one new truck for the Code Enforcement Division.
During the FY 24-25 Budget development process, Staff identified the need to purchase one full-size pickup truck to meet the increasing demands of the Code Enforcement Division.
Currently, the Code Enforcement Division (Division) is assigned two (2) 2022 Volkswagen ID.4 vehicles to conduct field operations. The Division needs a larger vehicle to respond to code enforcement issues that require the retrieval of large items such as shopping carts, vendor carts/stalls and unauthorized signage. The selected vehicle for this purchase is one (1) 2024 F-150 Lightning Crew Cab pickup truck and will be purchased from Ken Grody Ford. The truck is ready to be delivered upon receipt of an approved purchase order from the City. The total cost of the vehicle amounts to $75,236.56. A total of $80,000 has been budgeted in the FY 24-25 CIP Budget for this purpose. This recommended action will approve the purchase of the proposed vehicle using the available budgeted funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the purchase of one (1) 2024 Ford F-150 Lightning Crew Cab work truck from Ken Grody Ford in the amount of $75,236.56; and
1.g.
July 16, 2024
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
2. Authorize the City Administrator to approve invoice changes up to 10% of the quoted amount; and
3. Authorize the City Administrator and/or his designee to issue a purchase order to Ken Grody Ford for this vehicle and execute all necessary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
STRATEGIC PLAN STATEMENT:
There is no specific strategic planning goal or objective associated with this agenda item.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council budgeted funds in the current fiscal year to purchase a new truck for the Code Enforcement Division. For this purchase Staff determined the selected 2024 Ford F-150 Lightning Crew Cab truck to be a suitable vehicle for the needs of the Code Enforcement Division due to its ideal size, lower maintenance costs, and ride comfort. The City currently operates a fleet of electric vehicles and the purchase of an electric vehicle for this utility use furthers the City's goal of transitioning its fleet to electric vehicles when feasible. The vehicle has been placed on order by Ken Grody Ford and is ready for delivery if approved by the City Council.
Staff received one (1) suitable competitive bid from Ken Grody Ford for one (1) 2024 Ford F-150 Lightning crew cab truck in the amount of $75,236.56. Staff recommends the purchase of the selected maintenance vehicle from Ken Grody Ford as they are the only vendor that can deliver this vehicle upon approval. Currently, there is a lack of vehicle inventory and a 2-3 year waiting period when ordering a truck directly from the factory. This action authorizes the purchase of one (1) F-150 Lighting truck for use by the Code Enforcement Division from Ken Grody Ford, utilizing budgeted funds within the adopted Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget. Upon taking delivery of this vehicle, it will be added to the City's fleet management list.
Staff will utilize the remaining budgeted funds to outfit the vehicle with the necessary tools and equipment upon receipt.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of $80,000 in Measure U and Equipment Replacement funds was budgeted the FY 2024-25 CIP Budget for this purchase. The quote from Ken Grody to purchase one (1) 2024 Ford F-150 Lightning truck is for a total of $75,236.56. As such, sufficient funds exist for the recommended actions. Once received, the vehicle will be added to the City's fleet inventory.
Prepared by:
inv
Samantha Byfield
Public Works Manager
Reviewed and approved:
40maivAa
Chris Tanio, P.E.
Acting Director of Public Works.
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
Reviewed and appro
J,nnifer'L'ampman
7irectar of Finance ' City Administrator
Reviewed and approved:
Attachment:
Quote from Ken Grody Ford
Damien R. Arrula
CITY OF PLACENTIA
2024 RWG22362
IK E 1 V G I , ,^,.Y FPN R RSO:NICHOLAS
LIGHTNING VIN MPUZANO
SALESPERSON: NICHOLAS CAMPUZANO
7/3/2024 3:53 PM
This presentation is designed to provide an example of various finance options that may be available. Incentive programs, Rebates, Rates, Terms and Payments are estimates, subject to change and are impacted by individual credit history and subject to credit approval and program verification. Specific details will be provided when an alternative or alternatives are selected.
Cash Deal Structure
Vehicle Price
69,090.00
Document Prep Fee
85.00 Tire/Battery/VTR Fee
8.75 Sales Tax
6,052.81
Due On Delivery
75,236.56
Tax: 8.75% TAX
8.75 %
On Approved Credit. Payments are an estimate and may vary among lending institutions. The final terms of your loan or lease may differ depending on credit history and the actual terms of the financial institutions acceptance. Tax rules and amounts may vary based upon State or Locality. Vehicle Price is before Taxes and/or applicable fees. Tax Profile: 8.75% Tax
REV -007285 CA
4-REBILL, NB, 107285, RE201 7939 1202406 08 6447 ICERTICERT
ERTI PRO IRAMPIBOMPI CCAMPIBOOK
EXFL
ROTA
1OD023765 priN 1876N1HM1 RWG22362 NB .2
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
F-150 LIGHTNING
2024 F-150 4X4 SUPERCREW
145" WHEELBASE
131KWH EXT BAT -DUAL CHGR
SINGLE -SPEED TRANSMISSION
RWG22362
EXTERIOR
OXFORD WHITE
INTERIOR
MED DARK SLATE VINYL BUCKET
STANDARD EQUIPMENT WCLUDED AT NO EXTRA CHARQ
EXTERIOR
• DAYTIME RUNNING LAMPS
• FULLY BOXED STEEL FRAME
•HEADLAMPS - AUTO HIGH BEAM
• HEADLAMPS - AUTOLAMP
(ON/OFF)
• LARGE FRONT TRUNK AREA
• LED PROJECTOR W/ DYNAMIC
BENDING HEADLAMPS
• LOCKING REMOVABLE TAILGATE
WITH TAILGATE ASSIST
• PICKUP BOX TIE DOWN HOOKS
• POWER UP/DOWN FRONT HOOD
• REAR PRIVACY GLASS
• TRAILER SWAY CONTROL
INTERIOR
• 12" DIGITAL INSTRMNT CLSTR
• (TOUCH UP/DOWN DR/PASS WIN
• 60/40 FOLD -UP REAR BENCH
• A/C W/DUAL CUMATE CONTROL
• AUTO -DIM REARVIEW MIRROR
• DOOR LOCKS - POWER
• DUAL VISOR VANITY MIRRORS
• FRONT ROW HEATED SEATS
• MESSAGE CTR: OUTSIDE TEMP,
COMPASS, TRIP COMPUTER
• POWERPOINT - 2120V
• TILT/TELESCOPE STR COLUMN
FUNCTIONAL
• AUTO HOLD
• BLIS W/CROSS-TRAFFIC ALERT
• CLASS IV TRAILER HITCH
• COIL SPRINGS FRONT & REAR
• FORDPASS CONNECT''" 4G
HOTSPOT TELEMATICS MODEM
• LANE -KEEPING SYSTEM
• POST -COLLISION BRAKING
• PRE -COLLISION ASSIST W/AEB
• REAR ELOCKING AXLE
• REVERSE BRAKE ASSIST
• REVERSE SENSING AND
REAR VIEW CAMERA
• SELECTABLE DRIVE MODES
• SYNC®4 W/EVR & 12' SCREEN
; AFETY/SECURrry
• ADVANCETRACT" WITH RSCO
• AIRBAGS - FRONT SEAT
MOUNTED SIDE IMPACT
• AIRBAGS - SAFETY CANOPY®
- LED CTR HIGH MNT STOP LAMP
• PERIMETER ALARM
• SOS POST -CRASH ALERT SYSTM
WARRANTY
• 3YR/36,000 BUMPER/ BUMPER
• 5YR/60,000 POWERTRAIN
• 5YR/60,000 ROADSIDE ASSIST
• 5YR/60,000 SAFETY
RESTRAINT SYS
• 8YR/100,000 ELECTRIC
VEHICLE COMPONENTS
INCLUDED ON THIS VEHICLE
EQUIPMENT GROUP 114A
•PRO SERIES
OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT/OTHER
.ZERO EMISSIONS VEHICLE
131KWH EXT BAT -DUAL CHGR
275/60R20 BSW ALL -SEASON
8550/1GVWR PACKAGE
FRONT LICENSE PLATE BRACKE-
20" ALLOY DARK CARBONIZED GRAY
MOBILE POWER CORD (120V/2401/)
(MSRP)
11,500.00
NO CHARGE
500.00
I1AMP OrIE
CH27
nAMP IWO
CONVOY
BASE PRICE
TOTAL OPTIONS/OTHER
(MSRP)
554,995.00
12,000.00
TOTAL VEHICLE & OPTIONS/OTHER morn
DESTINATION & DELIVERY 2,095.00
\ Proudly designed and
(\ /) engineered in Michigan by
the Ford Model e Electric
Model en Vehicle Team.
TOTAL MSRP $69,090.00
ITEM e:
71-D359 O/T 60
This label is affixed pursuant to the Federal Aulomobae Information Disclosure Act. Gasoline, License, and Tide Fees, State and Local taxes are not included. Dealer installed options or accessories are not included unless listed above.
Whether you decide to lease or finance your
le, vehicle, you'll find the choices that are right
Ford Credit for you. See your dealer for details or visit www.ford.com/finance .
SPECIAL ORDER
RE201 R RB 2X 440 007285 05 20 24
EPA
DoT Fuel Economy and Environment
Fuel Economy
combined city/hwy
Driving Range
MPGeStandard Pickup Trucks range from 12 toYou save
73 MPGe. The best vehicle rates 140
MPGe.
0 110 180 240
Char •eTime:10.1hours 12aavl
Annual fuel cost
$1,100
Fuel Economy & Greenhouse Gas Rating (tailpipe only) Smog Rating uarlpipe only) in fuel costs
over 5 years
compared to the
average new vehicle.
a - m
10 1 MIMI 10
Best Best
This vehicle emits 0 grams C02 per mile. The best emits 0 grams per mile (tailpipe only). Does not include em,ss.ons nom generating electricity. learn more at fueleconomy.gov.
Actual results will vary for many reasons, including driving conditions and how you drive and maintain your vehicle. The average new vehicle gets 28 MPG and costs 59,750 to fuel over 5 years. Cost estimates we based on 15,000 miles per year at 5.15 per kW•hr. MPGe is miles per gasoline gallon equivalent. Vehicle emissions are a significant cause of climate change and smog. fueleconomygov
Calculate personalized estimates and compare vehicles
GOVERNMENT 5 -STAR SAFETY RATINGS
Overall Vehicle Score * * * * *
Based on the combined ratings of frontal, side and rollover.
Should ONLY be compared to other vehicles of similar size and weight.
Frontal Driver * * * *
Crash Passenger * * * *
Based on the risk of injury in a frontal impact.
Should ONLY be compared to other vehides of similar size and weight.
Side Front seat * * * * *
Crash Rear seat * * * * *
Based on the risk of injury in a side impact.
Rollover * * * *
Based on the risk of rollover in a single -vehicle crash.
Star ratings range from 1 to 5 stars (tlr Iliac*11r), with 5 being the highest.
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). www.safercar.gov or 1.888.327.4236
III
IMIIIIII
1 FT6 W I B M7R WG22362
IIIIVIW�IIIIII IIIIII (III EI
II
II
r�
MOTORTREND
TRUCK OF THE YEAR,
The FordPass Connect'" modern is active and
sending vehicle data (e.g., diagnostics) to Ford.
See in -vehicle Settings for connectivity options.
FordPass Connect" service and FordPass'• App required for certainremote features (see App Terms for more information).
Connected service and related feature functionality is subject to compatible AT&Tnetwor8 availability. Evolving technology/ cellular networks may affect functionality and availability, or continued provision of some features, prohibiting them Irom Erna -toning. Message and data rates may apply. See your local Ford website for our privacy policy.
FORD PROTECT'
Insist on Ford Protect! The only extended service
plan fully backed by Ford and honored at every Ford
dealership in the U.S. Canada and Mexico. See your
Ford dealer or visit www.FordOwnei com.
i WARNING: Operating, servicing and maintaining a passenger vehicle, pickup truck, van, or off -road vehicle can expose you to chemicals including phthalates and lead, which are known to the Slate of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive hams. To mininize exposure, wear gloves or wash your hands frequently when servicing your vehicle.
For more information go to www.P65Wamings.ca.gov/passenger-vehide . !MAN OR TEXT 1FRW622962T0 41028
nog SD.
ratiw may
8 Y.
Tan tjIfELP
ww.roeamryblyeerlv.ay-te,r.l
23_trd_1151pro_s cc5_oxwh.)pg
07/03/2024
1202406086447
Placentia City Council
AGENDA REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
VIA: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: ACTING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: JULY 16, 2024
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION WORK AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 1301
FISCAL
IMPACT: EXPENSE: $5,383,306.25 ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT $ 538,330.63 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS NO. 1-2
S 92,845.00 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES
$6,014,481.88 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
BUDGETED: S6,153,023.73
$3,000,000.00
$ 800,000.00
$ 600,000.00
$ 600,000.00
$ 511,949.28
$ 312,032.42
$ 190,578.93
$ 63,272.00
$ 39,418.10
SUMMARY:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
FY 2023-24 CIP BUDGET (799800-6740 JL
791301-6740)
FY 2023-24 CIP BUDGET (179800-6740 JL
171301-6740)
FY 2023-24 CIP BUDGET (189800-6740 JL
181301-6740)
FY 2023-24 CIP BUDGET (609800-6740 JL
601301-6740)
FY 2023-24 CIP BUDGET (601301-6740 JL
601301-6740)
FY 2023-24 CIP BUDGET (339800-6740 JL
331301-6740)
FY 2023-24 CIP BUDGET (709800-6740 JL
791301-6740)
FY 2023-24 CIP BUDGET (501301-6740)
FY 2023-24 CIP BUDGET (791301-6740 JL
791301-6740)
On October 17, 2023, the City Council awarded a construction contract to R.J. Noble Company, in the amount of $5,383,306.25 for the rehabilitation of several arterial, collector and residential streets totaling 1.4 million square feet of Placentia roadways. In general, the work consisted of pavement reconstruction; replacement of damaged concrete sidewalk, curb, and gutter; installation of new concrete bus pads on Kraemer Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue; new signing, striping, markings, and pavement legends; signal modifications at two intersections within
1.h.
July 16, 2024
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
the project limits; and protection of the fiber network. The project was completed with the addition of two (2) change orders in the total amount of $538,330.63, or ten percent (10%) of the construction contract amount. The Project has been completed to the satisfaction of the City. This action concludes the Project and authorizes filing a Notice of Completion with the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's Office in the amount of $5,921,636.88.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council take the following actions:
1. Accept the work performed by R. J. Noble Company for construction of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project, City Project No. 1301 for a grand total amount of $5,921,636.88; and
2. Approve Resolution No. R-2024-51 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California authorizing a budget amendment in Fiscal Year 2023-24 in compliance with City Charter of the City of Placentia §§1206 and 1209 pertaining to appropriations for actual expenditures; and
3. Authorize the City Administrator to file a Notice of Completion with the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's Office for the Project; and
4. Authorize the City Administrator to release retention funds in accordance with the terms of the contract.
STRATEGIC PLAN STATEMENT:
This item is consistent with the City Council approved 5 -Year Strategic Goal to Implement Public Infrastructure to Meet Community Needs, under Goal #5, which is to provide safe access to pedestrian and vehicular travel in the public right of way.
DISCUSSION:
The scope of this project entailed the rehabilitation of several arterial, collector and residential streets totaling 1.4 million square feet of Placentia roadways. In general, the work consisted of pavement reconstruction; replacement of damaged concrete sidewalk, curb, and gutter; installation of new concrete bus pads on Kraemer Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue; new signing, striping, markings, and pavement legends; signal modifications at two intersections - Orangethorpe Avenue and Kraemer Boulevard, as well as Placentia Avenue and Crowther Avenue; and protection of the fiber network. The location and limits of the street rehabilitation work included Orangethorpe Avenue (East of Placentia Avenue to West of Kraemer Boulevard), Crowther Avenue (East of Placentia Avenue to East of 57 Freeway Overpass), Bradford Avenue (North of Chapman Avenue to South of Yorba Linda Boulevard), Kraemer Boulevard (South of Chapman Avenue to South of Yorba Linda Boulevard) in addition to five residential cul-de-sac streets (Roanoke, Pecos River, Santee River, Salmon River and Rock River).
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
Two (2) contract change orders totaling an amount of $538,330.63, or ten percent (10%) of the construction contract amount were executed during the contract. During the course of construction, a variety of elements altered the project scope and schedule which included removal and replacement of unsuitable subgrade, failed storm drain requiring removal and replacement, and additional striping changes. The City requested a unit price adjustment credit for additional asphalt and concrete used and was reimbursed for inspection hours outside of normal work hours.
Additionally, the City was credited for liquidated damages by the Contractor for workdays in excess of the contract end date.
Funding for this project utilized several sources which included Gas Tax, Measure M, SB 1/RMRA, Measure U, TOD Traffic Impact Fees, and Various Agency Reimbursements (City of Anaheim, City of Fullerton, and SiFi Network). Approval of the Notice of Completion is the final step in this project and, if approved by the City Council, will be recorded with the Orange County Clerk - Recorder's Office starting the 35 -day window to file any construction claims against the contractor.
At the conclusion of the 35 -day window, if no claims have been filed with the City against the contractor, the City can release the retention funds, which amount to five percent (5%) of the total construction cost.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final construction cost plus the two change orders amounts to $5,921,636.88. This cost consists of the bid amount submitted by R. J. Noble Company in the amount of $5,383,306.25 and $538,330.63 for Contract Change Orders No. 1 and 2. The final contract with Fountainhead Consulting Corporation for Construction Inspection amounts to $92,845.00. As part of the recommended actions, approval of Resolution No. R-2024-51 (Attachment 2) will appropriate additional funds from the TOD Traffic Impact Funds to this project to reduce the funds needed from Measure U Funds due to the final cost of the project, as well as reduce the Various Agency Share to reflect actual reimbursed amounts per agency for work performed on their utilities or within their jurisdictions. With the recommended budget amendment resolution and funds budgeted and available in the FY 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program Budget, there are sufficient funds for the recommended actions.
Prepared by:
(.16)(,.
Raquel/Garcia, EIT
Associate Civil Engineer
Reviewed and approved:
Chris Tanio, P.E
Acting Director of�Public Works
Reviewed and approved:
Reviewed and approve
nn ampman
ire of Finance
Damien R. Arrula
City Administrator
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
Attachments:
1. Notice of Completion — R.J. Noble Company for Project No. 1301
2. Budget Amendment Resolution No. R-2024-51
pi////rn1\\\\\\\\w//A\\\\ //l/!/f/Ake • //�k1%, \\\�\tut/////!/frAM \\\\
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
r
Name
Street
Address
City &
State
L
City Clerk
City of Placentia
401 E. Chapman Ave.
Placentia, CA 92870
J
City Council Approval: July 16, 2024
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
Free Recording Per Government Code Section 27383 & 6103.
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Deputy City Clerk — Carole Wayman
Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.)
Notice is hereby given that:
1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described:
2. The full name of the owner is City of Placentia
3. The full address of the owner is 401 East Chapman Avenue Placentia, CA 92870
4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is: In fee.
N/A
(If other than fee, strike "In fee" and insert, for example, 'purchaser under contract of purchase," or "lessee")
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES
N/A
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on May 28, 2024. The work done was:
FY 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project. City Project #1301. This work included pavement rehabilitation of several arterial, collector and residential streets, replacement of damaced concrete sidewalk, curb and cutter, installation of concrete bus pads, traffic sicnal modifications, new sic ninc, stripinc and pavement markers.
The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was R. J. Noble Com Dany
7. 15505 East Lincoln Avenue, Orance, CA 92865 10/17/2023 (If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert "none".) (Date of Contract)
8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Placentia County of Orance , State of California, and is described as follows: FY 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation Project, City Project #1301
9. The street address of said property is none
(If no street address has been officially assigned. insert "none".)
CITY OF PLACENTIA
Dated: July 16, 2024
Verification for Individual Owner
Signature of owner or corporate officer of owner
named in paragraph 2 or his agent — Damien R. Arrula — City Administrator
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say: I am the City Administrator, Damien R. Arrula ("President of", "Manager of", "Owner of", etc.)
the declarant of the foregoing
Notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on July 16
(Date of Signature.)
, 2024 , at Placentia , California.
(City where signed.)
(Personal signature of the individual who is swearing
that the contents of the notice of completion are
true.)- Damien R Arrula — City Administrator
NOTICE OF COMPLETION - WOLCOTTS FORM 1114 - REV. 6-74
8 pt. type or larger
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. R-2024-51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING A BUDGET
AMENDMENT IN FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 IN COMPLIANCE
WITH CITY CHARTER OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA §§ 1206
AND 1209 PERTAINING TO APPROPRIATIONS FOR
ACTUAL EXPENDITURES.
A. Recitals.
(i). The adopted budget for the 2023-24 Fiscal Year sets out estimated appropriations for City expenses throughout the year.
(ii). From time to time the adopted budget must be adjusted when precise expenditures are finally determined or when estimated expenditures exceed projected costs allocated.
(iii). City Charter of the City of Placentia § 1206 authorizes the City Council to amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by the affirmative votes of at least three members to authorize the transfer of unused balances appropriated for one purpose to another purpose, or to appropriate available revenues not included in the budget. All other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A., of this Resolution.
2. The adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24, via Resolution No. R-2023-42, is hereby amended to reflect the following expenditure of funds from the Account specified to the Account specified:
Fund
Description
Department
GL Account
JL
Account
Amount
Type
City Capital
Projects Fund
Reimbursement
from City of
Anaheim
Public Works
339800-4299
331301-
4299
($53,364.
59)
Decrease
in
Revenue
Capital Project
Fund
FY 2022-23
Roadway Rehab
Project
Public Works
339800-6740
331301-
6740
($53,364.
59)
Decrease
in
Expense
City Capital
Projects Fund
Reimbursement
from Fullerton
Public Works
339800-4299
331301-
4299
($32,602.
99)
Decrease
in
Revenue
Resolution R-2024-51
Capital Project
Fund
FY 2022-23
Roadway Rehab
Proect
Public Works
339800-6740
331301-
6740
($32,602.
99)
Decrease
in
Expense
City Capital
Projects Fund
Reimbursement
from SiFi
Public Works
339800-4710
331301-
4710
$7,500
Revenue
City Capital
Projects Fund
FY 2022-23
Roadway Rehab
Project
Public Works
339800-6740
331301-
6740
$7,500
Expense
TOD Traffic
Impact Fee
TOD Traffic
Mitigation
Public Works
709800-6747
702001-
6741
$95,578.
93 Decrease
TOD Traffic
Impact Fee
FY 2022-23
Roadway Rehab
Proect
Public Works
709800-6740
701301-
6740
$95,578.
93 Increase
3. The Mayor shall sign this resolution, and the City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 16t" DAY OF JULY 2024.
Jeremy B. Yamaguchi, Mayor
ATTEST:
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
Resolution R-2024-51
I, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia held on the 16th day of July 2024 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christian Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Resolution R-2024-51
Placentia City Council
AGENDA REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
VIA: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: ACTING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: JULY 16, 2024
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION WORK AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE LA PLACITA PARKETTE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 7911
FISCAL
IMPACT: EXPENSE: $ 292,617.30 ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT S 615.52 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
$ 293,232.82 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
BUDGETED: $ 726,050.00 FY 2022-23 & 2023-24 CIP PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY:
On November 7, 2023, the City Council awarded a construction contract to SDC Engineering, Inc, in the amount of $292,617.30 for the La Placita Parkette Improvement Project. In general, the work consisted of removal of the existing playground and amenities, addition of water efficient irrigation, landscaping, decorative fencing, new park lighting, removal and replacement of damaged concrete sidewalk panels and provided Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility improvements to ensure the park is fully accessible. The new playground equipment and rubberized surfacing is to be installed separately by the playground manufacturer. This portion of the project was completed with one balancing change order in the amount of $615.52, or less than one percent of the construction contract amount. The construction has been completed to the satisfaction of the City. This action concludes the construction and authorizes filing a Notice of Completion with the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's Office in the amount of $293,232.82.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Accept the work performed by SDC Engineering, Inc. for construction of the La Placita Parkette Improvement Project, City Project No. 7911 for a grand total amount of $293,232.82; and
2. Authorize the City Administrator to file a Notice of Completion with the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's Office for the Project; and
1.i.
July 16, 2024
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
3. Authorize the City Administrator to release retention funds in accordance with the terms of the contract.
STRATEGIC PLAN STATEMENT:
This item is consistent with the City Council approved 5 -Year Strategic Goal to Implement Public Infrastructure to Meet Community Needs, under Objective #5.2, which is working to complete the Placentia Parks Initiative Plan.
DISCUSSION:
On November 7, 2023, the City Council awarded a construction contract to SDC Engineering, Inc, in the amount of $292,617.30 for the La Placita Parkette Improvement Project. The scope of this project entailed a complete renovation of La Placita Parkette. In general, the work consisted of removal of the existing playground and amenities, addition of water efficient irrigation, landscaping, decorative fencing, new park lighting, removal and replacement of damaged concrete sidewalk panels and provided Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility improvements to ensure the park is fully accessible.
The City Council authorized contract change orders up to ten percent (10%) of the contract amount, or $29,261.73. One balancing contract change order totaling $615.52, or less than one percent of the construction contract amount, was executed during this contract.
On June 7, 2022, the City Council approved the purchase and installation of the playground equipment through a separate contract by Great Western Installations Inc. The equipment was purchased in December of 2022 and the installation is being scheduled through the Community Services Department now that the park improvements have been completed. The citrus themed playground will feature a spinner, new slides, citrus tree climbers, shade sails, a playhouse, wagon climber, and inclusive play elements.
Funding for this project utilized several sources which included California Proposition 68 Parks and Water Bond of 2018 Funds, City Quimby In -Lieu Fees and General Funds. Approval of the Notice of Completion is the final step in this construction project and, if approved by the City Council, will be recorded with the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's Office starting the 35 -day window to file any construction claims against the Contractor. At the conclusion of the 35 -day window, if no claims have been filed with the City against the Contractor, the City can release the retention funds which amount to five percent (5%) of the total construction cost.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total construction cost for the La Placita Parkette Improvement Project amounts to $293,232.82. This cost consists of the bid amount submitted by SDC Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $292,617.30 and the addition of $615.52 for Balancing Contract Change Order No. 1.
A total amount of $726,050.00 was available and budgeted within the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program Budget for this project. As such, sufficient funds exist for the recommended actions.
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
Page3of3
Prepared by:
Raquel arcia, EIT
Associate Civil Engineer
Rev wed and a • pe• :
Karen Croc
Director of C. • m - y Service
Reviewed and approved:___
Damien R. Arrula
City Administrator
Reviewed and approved:
ris Tanio, PE
/(),.(260
Acting Director of Public Works
Reviewed and approved.
mpm
f Finance
Attachment:
Notice of Completion — SDC Engineering, Inc. for Project No. 7911
V/!///rn1\\\\\\\W///A�\\\\i//l/I/f/.��\ /fhira% \\:\W" \\.1 N
e
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
r
Name
Street
Address
City &
State
L
City Clerk
City of Placentia
401 E. Chapman Ave.
Placentia, CA 92870
J
City Council Approval:
July 16, 2024
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
Free Recording Per Government Code Section 27383 & 6103.
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Carole Wayman, Deputy City Clerk
Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.)
Notice is hereby given that:
1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described:
2. The full name of the owner is City of Placentia
3. The full address of the owner is 401 East Chapman Avenue Placentia, CA 92870
4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is: In fee.
N/A
(If other than fee, strike "In fee" and insert, for example, 'purchaser under contract of purchase," or "lessee")
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES
N/A
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on May 20, 2024. The work done was:
La Placita Parkette Improvement Project, City Project #7911. This work included removal of existinc alaycround, addition of water efficient irrication, IandscaDinc, decorative fencinc, lichtinc, concrete sidewalk and access ramp.
The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was SDC Encineerinc, Inc.
7. 24881 Alicia Parkway, Suite E #340, Lacuna Hills, CA 92653 11/7/2023 (If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert "none".) (Date of Contract)
8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Placentia County of Orance , State of California, and is described as follows: La Placita Parkette Improvement Project, City Project #7911.
9. The street address of said property is 900 Gonzales St, Placentia, CA 92870. (If no street address has been officially assigned. insert "none".)
CITY OF PLACENTIA
Dated: July 16, 2024
Verification for Individual Owner
Damien R. Arrula, City Administrator
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say: I am the City Administrator, Damien R. Arrula the declarant of the foregoing ("President of", "Manager of", "Owner of", etc.)
Notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on July 16
(Date of Signature.)
NOTICE OF COMPLETION — WOLCOTTS FORM 1114 - REV. 6-74
, 2024, at Placentia , California.
(City where signed.)
Damien R. Arrula (Personal signature of the
individual who is swearing that the contents of the
notice of completion are true.) -
8 pt. type or larger
ATTACHMENT 1
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
Placentia Cit
CITY COUNCIL
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Council
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: JULY 16, 2024
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PLACEWORKS, INC. TO COMPLETE THE SP -5 CORRIDOR PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE FISCAL
IMPACT:
AMOUNT NEEDED FOR AGREEMENT:
STAFF RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCY:
TOTAL COST OF PROPOSED AGREEMENT:
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE FEE FUNDS (749504-6017)
(3 Years)
$389,129
S+10,871
$400,000
$400,000
SUMMARY:
As part of the City Council's annual goal setting process, this year City Council included a goal to prepare an update to Specific Plan 5 (SP -5). This Specific Plan update will provide a vision for the future of SP -5, focusing on future land uses. This effort will also revitalize the SP -5 corridor with updated development standards and design guidelines that are specifically tailored to the neighborhood. As SP -5 is a Specific Plan, it is a Zoning document, and amending the Specific Plan requires supporting environmental documentation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As such, Staff prepared a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update. The RFP was circulated for approximately 3 weeks. The recommended actions would approve a Professional Services Agreement with Placeworks, Inc., in a not -to -exceed amount of $400,000 over multiple Fiscal Years.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Placeworks, Inc. to provide professional services related to the SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update and supporting environmental documentation for an amount not to exceed $400,000; and
2. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the necessary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
1.j.
July 16, 2024
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
STRATEGIC PLAN STATEMENT:
This item is consistent with the City Council approved 5 -Year Strategic Goal to:
Promote Community and Economic Development, as Objective Number 3.3 is to "Continue to recruit and attract retail, hotel and other commercial businesses that complement adjacent City assets and attractions (Anaheim Resort District, Cal State Fullerton, OC Vibe and Angel Stadium Projects)" and Objective Number 3.6 is to "Create design review guidelines and procedures". This agenda item will update the SP -5 Specific Plan to include updated development standards and design guidelines. Also, This project area is poised to benefit directly from adjacent City assets and attractions (Anaheim Resort District, Cal State Fullerton, OC Vibe and Angel Stadium Projects). The SP -5 update is an advanced Planning effort that will result in optimizing land uses to benefit from adjacent assets and will shape the future land use pattern of SP -5.
BACKGROUND:
The General Plan is the City's land use constitution, a legal policy document that is mandated to exist by the State of California. The General Plan is intended to reflect the community's values and set policies to guide in the development, maintenance, and use of the City's built environment.
The Land Use Element is one of several mandatory General Plan Elements required by the State.
On October 1, 2019, City Council adopted the comprehensive General Plan Update, which included an updated Land Use Element. The Land Use Element of the 2019 General Plan strongly encourages enhancements and improvements to the visual image, physical design characteristics, economic vitality and infrastructure of major corridors as indicated in the subsequent paragraphs.
Goal LU-1 states: Provide a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial, industrial, and open space/recreation uses, while providing adequate community services to City residents. Policy LU-1.10 further states: Create specific zoning or plans for major corridors within the City. This policy includes the SP -5 project area which runs adjacent to Placentia Avenue and Orangethorpe Avenue, among other major thoroughfares.
Goal LU-3 states: Revitalize underutilized, abandoned, or dilapidated commercial, industrial, and residential uses and properties. Policy LU-3.1 furthers this goal by stating: Encourage opportunities for redevelopment and improvements in the Old Town area, the TOD district, industrial areas, neighborhoods in the southern sector of the City, and commercial centers along major roadway corridors. This goal is consistent with the SP -5 project area which runs adjacent to Placentia Avenue and Orangethorpe Avenue, and an SP -5 update furthers this goal.
Goal LU-5 states: Improve urban design in Placentia to ensure that development is both architecturally attractive and functionally compatible and to create identifiable neighborhoods, and community areas. Policy LU-6.6 furthers this goal by stating: Improve urban design in Placentia to ensure that development is both architecturally attractive and functionally compatible and to create identifiable neighborhoods, and community areas. The SP -5 Specific Plan update would further this goal.
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
Goal LU-6 states: Enhance and improve the visual image, economic vitality and infrastructure of the Old Town area, TOD, and surrounding areas, like the future Chapman corridor. Policy LU-6.6 furthers this goal by stating: Focus planning and economic development efforts to spur development and infrastructure improvement on major transportation corridors. The SP -5 update is an advanced Planning effort that will result in optimizing land uses to benefit from adjacent assets, will focus on economic development and will shape the future land use pattern of SP -5.
Goal LU-10 states: Create enhanced connectivity with California State University Fullerton (CSUF) campus community. Policy LU-10.2 furthers this goal by stating: In creating the aforementioned corridor plans, the City shall take into consideration the nearby Cal State University Fullerton campus community and capitalize on its proximity. The SP -5 update is an advanced Planning effort that will result in optimizing land uses to benefit from adjacent assets and will shape the future land use pattern of SP -5.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council, as part of their annual goal setting process, recently included a goal to prepare an update to Specific Plan 5 (SP -5). This Specific Plan update will provide a vision for the future of SP -5, focusing on future land uses. This effort will also revitalize the SP -5 corridor with updated development standards and design guidelines that are specifically tailored to the neighborhood.
As SP -5 is a Specific Plan, it is a Zoning document, and amending the Specific Plan requires supporting environmental documentation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Prior to selecting Placeworks for this effort, the Development Services Department conducted an RFP process, which was circulated for approximately three weeks. Two professional firms responded: Kimley-Horn, and Placeworks. A staff project review team made up of the Director of Development Services, Planning Manager, and Public Works Senior Management Analyst reviewed the RFPs, and independently and unanimously ranked Placeworks first based upon qualifications and related experience.
Placeworks total cost was the least of the firms mentioned. The total amount of the PSA, $400,000 represents $389,129 based on Placeworks proposal, plus $10,871 contingency. The recommended actions would approve a Professional Services Agreement with Placeworks, Inc., in a not -to -exceed amount of $400,000 over multiple Fiscal Years.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The SP -5 Specific Plan update effort has been partially budgeted for in the FY 2024-25 CIP in the amount of $98,000. The funding source for this effort is General Plan Update fee revenue, which is a sustainable revenue source that accrues annually and must be spent on Planning efforts related to the General Plan such as this project. To complete the task, an additional $302,000 is proposed to be budgeted for the SP -5 update either mid -year FY 2024-25 or the additional amount(s) would be budgeted in FY 2025-26 and/or FY 2026-27 as this effort is scheduled to take approximately two years, meaning it could span three fiscal years. As noted, General Plan Update
City Council Agenda
July 16, 2024
Fee Funds would be utilized for this project which are restricted to General Plan related studies and plans which does not affect operational funds.
Prepared by:
*44 --
se hM. Lambert
P
Director of Development Services
Reviewed and approved:
Damien R. Arrula
City Administrator
Reviewed and approve
nife(Lampman
recf6'r of Finance
Attachments:
1. Professional Services Agreement with Placeworks, Inc.
Exhibit A. Scope of Work and Cost Proposal
Exhibit B. Insurance Requirements
Exhibit C. Certificates of Insurance
PSA TEMPLATE (LONG FORM)
CITY OF PLACENTIA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH
PLACEWORKS, INC.
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 16th day of July, 2024 ("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF PLACENTIA, a municipal corporation ("City"), and PLACEWORKS, INC, a California S -Corporation ("Consultant").
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to complete the SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update and related CEQA documents, as more fully described herein; and
B. WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise contemplated within California Government Code Section 37103, and holds all necessary licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and C. WHEREAS, City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described in Exhibit "A" (the "Project") and desire to set forth their rights, duties, and liabilities in connection with the services to be performed; and
D. WHEREAS, no official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions of Sections 1090-1092 of the California Government Code, in the subject matter of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT
1.1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide the professional services described in the Consultant's Proposal ("Proposal"), attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their respective fields and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound professional practices. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. Officers and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this Section.
1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City. Consultant agrees to perform all the work to the complete satisfaction of the City and within the hereinafter specified. Evaluations of the work will be done by the City Administrator or his or her designee. If the quality of work is not satisfactory, City in its discretion has the right to:
(a) Meet with Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the matters of concern;
(b) Require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is satisfactory; and/or
(c) Terminate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.
1.4. Warranty. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws, including, but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers' compensation insurance and safety in employment; and all other Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the services required under this Agreement. Consultant warrants that it is not suspended or debarred from doing business with the United States government and can legally be paid from federal funds. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every nature and description including attorneys' fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above -mentioned laws, which may be incurred by reason of Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
1.5. Non-discrimination. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sexual gender, or sexual orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the Government Code. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay, or other forms of compensation and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, a notice setting forth provisions of this non-discrimination clause.
Consultant shall, in all solicitations and advertisements for employees placed by, or on behalf of Consultant shall state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to age, race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or mental or physical disability. Consultant shall cause the paragraphs contained in this Section to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by the Agreement, provided that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials.
1.6. Non -Exclusive Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services contemplated by this Agreement.
1.7. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant's sole cost and expense. All insurance requirements contained in this Agreement are independently applicable to any and all subcontractors that Consultant may engage during the term of this 2 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
Agreement.
1.8. Confidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
2.0. COMPENSATION AND BILLING
2.1. Compensation. Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". Consultant's total compensation shall not exceed four hundred thousand Dollars ($400,000), unless authorized herein.
2.2. Additional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services provided outside the scope of services specified in the Consultant's Proposal or which is inconsistent with or in violation of the provisions of this Agreement unless the City or the Project Manager for this Project, prior to Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable.
Should the City request in writing additional services that increase the hereinabove described "Scope of Services", an additional fee based upon the Consultant's standard hourly rates shall be paid to the Consultant for such additional services. Such increase in additional fees shall be limited to 10% of the total contract sum. The City Administrator is authorized to approve a Change Order for such additional services. Where the original contract is $40,000.00 or less, City Council approval shall be required prior to any increase bringing the total compensation to more than $40,000.00.
2.3. Method of Billing. Consultant may submit invoices to the City for approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant's services which have been completed to City's sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant's invoice within forty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail the services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as "Additional Services" and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices.
2.4. Records and Audits. Records of Consultant's services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times for a period of three (3) years from the Effective Date.
3.0. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1. Commencement and Completion of Work. The professional services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. Said services shall be performed in strict compliance with the Project Schedule 3 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
approved by City as set forth in Exhibit "A".
3.2. Excusable Delays. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, material shortages, compliance with laws or regulations, riots, acts of war, or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a party. If a delay beyond the control of the Consultant is encountered, a time extension may be mutually agreed upon in writing by the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shall present documentation satisfactory to the City to substantiate any request for a time extension.
4.0. TERM AND TERMINATION
4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a period of approximately 29 months, ending on December 31, 2026, unless previously terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties.
4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of canceling, suspending, or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing at least fifteen (15) days prior written notice to Consultant. The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City. If the City suspends, terminates, or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination, or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
If the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of written notice of such default in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
The City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement, at its option and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement, immediately upon service of written notice of termination on the Consultant, if the latter should:
a. Be adjudged a bankrupt;
b. Become insolvent or have a receiver of its assets or property appointed because of insolvency;
c. Make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; d. Default in the performance of any obligation or payment of any indebtedness under this Agreement;
e. Suffer any judgment against it to remain unsatisfied or unbonded of record for thirty (30) days or longer; or
4 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
f. Institute or suffer to be instituted any procedures for reorganization or rearrangement of its affairs.
4.3. Compensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including the date of City's written notice of termination within thirty-five (35) days after service of the notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be prorated based on the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in accordance with the fees set forth herein.
In ascertaining the professional services actually rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings, and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the City or in the possession of the Consultant. City shall not be liable for any claim of lost profits.
4.4. Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to, finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings, maps, and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization from Consultant shall be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal expense to Consultant.
5.0. INSURANCE
5.1. Insurance. The Consultant and all subcontractors, if any, shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement, including any extension thereof, insurance as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Neither the City nor any of its officers, officials, agents, employees, or volunteers makes any representation that the types of insurance and the limits specified to be carried by Consultant under this Agreement are adequate to protect Consultant. If Consultant believes that any such insurance coverage is insufficient, Consultant shall provide, at its own expense, such additional insurance as Consultant deems adequate.
5.2. Deductible or Self -Insured Retention. If any of such policies provide for a deductible or self -insured retention to provide such coverage, the amount of such deductible or self -insured retention shall be approved in advance by City. No policy of insurance issued as to which the City is an additional insured shall contain a provision which requires that no insured except the named insured can satisfy any such deductible or self -insured retention.
5.3. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide to City certificates of insurance showing the insurance coverages, as well as providing the City with the required endorsements in a form and content approved by City, prior to performing any services under this Agreement.
The certificates of insurance and endorsements shall be attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference.
5.4. Non -limiting. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way, the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which Consultant may be 5 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.
6.0. GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing and signed by the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including exhibits to this Agreement.
6.2. Representatives. The City Administrator or his or her designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement and may issue all consents, approvals, directives, and agreements on behalf of the City, called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.
Consultant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives, and agreements on behalf of Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.
6.3. Project Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to assure that the Project Manager is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decision, which must be made by City, to the Project Manager. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Project Manager.
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and be its agent in all consultations with City during the term of this Agreement and who shall not be changed by Consultant without the express written approval by the City. Consultant or its Project Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City.
6.4. Notices. Any notices, documents, correspondence, or other communications concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery, facsimile or if mailed, shall be addressed as set forth below and placed in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and deposited in the United States Postal Service. Such communication shall be deemed served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal delivery; b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 72 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such communication is sent through regular United States mail.
IF TO CONSULTANT: IF TO CITY:
PLACEWORKS, INC.
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, CA 92707
Karen Gully,
Vice President and Managing
6 City of Placentia
401 E. Chapman Ave.
Placentia, CA 92870
[PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
Principal, Design
Tel. (714) 966-9220 ex. 2347
[email protected]
Tel: (714) 993-8234
Attn: Joe Lambert
[email protected]
6.5. Attorneys' Fees. In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms, conditions, or provisions hereof.
6.6. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange County, California. Consultant agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action.
6.7. Assignment. Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign, transfer, sublet, or encumber all or any part of Consultant's interest in this Agreement without City's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting, or encumbrance shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this Agreement. Regardless of City's consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of Consultant's obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder for the term of this Agreement.
6.8. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Consultant and City shall indemnify each other and their officials, officers, and employees from any losses incurred as a result of negligent acts or omissions, or willful misconduct of the indemnifying party, its officials, officers, employees, or subcontractors in connection with the performance of the scope of work of this Agreement.
The parties acknowledge that neither party has an up -front obligation to provide a legal defense to the other party in connection with this indemnification obligation. In the event that either party incurs a loss resulting from the indemnifying party's negligent action or omission, or willful misconduct, the indemnifying party shall reimburse the indemnified party for its reasonable defense costs proportionate to the finally determined percentage of liability based upon the comparative fault of the indemnifying party. Consultant's liability shall be limited to the amounts available under Consultant's professional liability insurance policy.
6.9. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent.
Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers, agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the 7 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this paragraph.
6.10. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.
Notwithstanding any other agency, State, or Federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.
6.11. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require.
6.12. Ownership of Documents. All findings, reports, documents, information, and data including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, preliminary notes, working documents, files, and tapes furnished or prepared by Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City but shall be made available to the City within ten (10) days of request or within ten (10) days of termination. Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from City's use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete documents furnished by Consultant.
Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports, documents, information, data, preliminary notes and working documents, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs, files audio tapes, or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized representative, at no additional cost to the City. Consultant or Consultant's agents shall execute such documents as may be necessary from time to time to confirm City's ownership of the copyright in such documents.
6.13. Public Records Act Disclosure. Consultant has been advised and is aware that 8 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
this Agreement and all reports, documents, information, and data, including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs, or files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, pursuant to this Agreement and provided to City may be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California Government Code Section 7920.000 et seq.). Exceptions to public disclosure may be those documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the California Government Code Section 7924.510, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret. The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.
6.14. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates, and subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant's services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090.
During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates, and subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates, or subconsultants to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute. Consultant's duties and services under this Agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the City with any portion of the City's preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the City. The City shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project.
Consultant's participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications.
Consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project, if any, have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement.
6.15. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City's representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Consultant occurs, then Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates, and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction.
6.16. Prohibited Employment. Consultant will not employ any regular employee of City while this Agreement is in effect.
6.17. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and conditions of this Agreement and those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by reference, the conflict shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order, if applicable:
9 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
This Agreement, the City's Request for Proposals, the Consultant's Proposal.
6.18. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein.
6.19. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this Agreement.
6.20. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
6.21. Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
6.22. Amendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement.
6.23. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
6.24. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party, is materially impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good faith negotiations.
6.25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement.
6.26. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement.
10 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written.
CITY OF PLACENTIA,
A municipal corporation
Date:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
of the City of Placentia
CONSULTANT:
Date:
Signature
Name and Title
Social Security or Taxpayer ID Number
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date:
Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
11 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
Date:
Risk Manager
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date:
Joe Lambert, Project Manager
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL:
Date:
Joe Lambert, Director of Development Services
12 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL AND SCOPE OF WORK
13 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
EXHIBIT B
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
14 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
EXHIBIT C
CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE AND ENDORSEMENTS
15 [PLACEWORKS, INC.]
Rev. 01/2024
L1
PLACEWORKS
Placentia SP -5 Corridor Plan and
Specific Plan Update
CITY OF PLACENTIA • DUE JULY 5, 2024 (SUBMITTED JULY 3, 2024) M
T -
w«mm
1 "-'V
NM MA 0.1
PLACENTIA CORPORATE' INTER
•.v
aHENRYSCHEW'
ID] PLACEWORKS
Placentia SP -5 Corridor Plan and
Specific Plan Update
SUBMITTED TO:
CITY OF PLACENTIA
Department of Development Services
Joseph Lambert
Director of Development Services
401 East Chapman Avenue
Placentia CA 92870
714.993.8124 I [email protected]
SUBMITTED BY:
PLACEWORKS
Karen Gulley
Managing Principal, Design
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana CA 92707
714.966.9220 I [email protected]
WITH:
FEHR & PEERS
FUSCOE ENGINEERING
DUE JULY 5, 2024 (SUBMITTED JULY 3, 2024)
PLACEWORKS.COM
IN
i
%1
I
TRANSVITTAL LETTER
July 3, 2024
Joe Lambert, Director of Development Services
CITY OF PLACENTIA
Department of Development Services
401 East Chapman Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
Subject:SP-5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
Dear Mr. Lambert:
PLACEWORKS
Our team is excited to continue our work in Placentia, building off the Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan to expand or implement new designations and standards for Specific Plan 5 (SP -5). This part of the city is a prime location to create a destination that could give visitors staying in the area a central hub to nearby attractions in Anaheim or elsewhere in Orange County. Capitalizing on the roughly 5 -mile proximity to Disneyland and OCv!be—with their upcoming DisneyForward expansion and new entertainment and sports venues, respectively —SP -5 is an excellent opportunity to continue to spur economic growth for Placentia.
Similar to our approach for Chapman Corridor, we will work alongside the City to ensure the community and decision makers are involved in the planning process —providing valuable input and ensuring there are no surprises along the way. For the land use plan and standards, we will focus on creating a sense of place for this area, encouraging recreation, dining, and other experience -focused uses that will activate the area and support established development such as the existing hotels.
This proposal addresses the tasks identified in the RFP with two possible approaches for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review that would tier off the findings of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City of Placentia Rich Heritage, Bright Future: Placentia General Plan (General Plan Update) (2019 GP EIR). The first approach is an Addendum ("Option A"), which would provide the most efficient path for CEQA review. However, if the project triggers the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, a Subsequent EIR (SEIR) ("Option B") would be required. Technical consultants supporting this team include Fuscoe Engineering (Fuscoe) and Fehr & Peers (F&P). Fuscoe will assist by preparing drainage, water, and sewer systems necessary for the Specific Plan Update and CEQA document. F&P will assist with traffic and mobility. The technical studies will support both the Specific Plan Update and CEQA effort.
It should be noted that F&P and Fuscoe are working on Chapman Corridor and have collaborated on several similar projects over the years. We look forward to assisting the City with this project.
This proposal shall remain valid for 180 days from the date of submittal. As a Principal, Karen Gulley is authorized to bind the team to the contents of this submittal and to negotiate contracts on behalf of PlaceWorks. Please contact either of us at 714.966.9220 or via email with any questions.
We look forward to your response.
Respectfully submitted,
PLACEWORKS
Suzann chwab AICP I Associate Principal Karen Gulley I Managin rincipal, Design x2323 I [email protected] x2347 I [email protected] 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 I Santa Ana, California 92707 I 714.966.9220 I PlaceWorks.com
TA3LE OF CO\TENTS
TRANSMITTAL LETTE6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUALIFICATIONS, RELATED EXPERIENCE AND
REFERENCES 1
PlaceWorks 1
Experience with References 6
Subconsultants 11
Disclosures 13
STAFFING 17
Project Team Organization 17
Key Personnel 18
WORKPLAN/TECHNICAL APPROACH 25
Project Understanding 25
PlaceWorks' Approach 26
Scope of Work 26
CEQA Approach and Considerations 34
Schedule 50
APPENDIX A-1
Resumes A-1
Relevant Project Details A-31
PlaceWorks' Proposed Agreement Changes A-49
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS iii
4 Table of Contents
This page intentionally left blank.
IV CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
QUALIFICATIONS, RELATED
EXPERIENCE, AND REFERENCES
n
-
•
itg
•
QUALIFICATIONS, RELATED EXPERIENCE
AND REFERENCES
PlaceWorks
Since its founding in 1975, PlaceWorks, Inc. has provided comprehensive land use/policy planning and land design services to both public- and private -sector clients. Since 1980, we have provided environmental compliance services.
As our name suggests, PlaceWorks is about places and how they work —geographically, environmentally, functionally, aesthetically and culturally —but we are also passionate about how we work collaboratively with our clients. Ours is a holistic approach. We celebrate personal passion and ownership while encouraging integrity, creativity, and innovative thinking. We bring people together from diverse practice areas, offering the best -of -all -worlds capability and connectivity. Just as each place we work with is distinctly different, so is our thinking.
Our Services
Community Planning
• Comprehensive Planning, including
General Plans, Specific Plans
• Community Engagement
• Housing Research and Analysis
• Zoning and Form -Based Code
• Infill Planning and Design
• Corridor Planning
• Climate Adaptation and Resiliency
Planning
• Transit -Oriented Development
Planning
• Transportation and Active
Transportation Planning
• Municipal Services
• Geographic Information Systems
• Creative Media
Design
• Transit -Oriented Design
• Downtown Planning & Design
• Design Standards & Guidelines
• Site Planning
• Large -Scale Planning and Design
• Entitlement Planning & Design
• Strategic Planning
Environmental Services
• CEQA/NEPA Documentation
• Third -Party Peer Review
• Technical Studies, including:
Air Quality, GHG Emissions, Energy,
Noise, Vibration & Acoustics,
Hydrology & Water Quality/Supply,
Health Risk Assessments, Wildfire
and Safety, Visual Impact Analyses
• Regulatory Compliance
Economics
• Economic, Market & Fiscal Analysis
• Site Selection & Development
• Feasibility Studies
• Transfer of Development Rights
Landscape Architecture
• Park, Open Space, Trails Design and
Project Management
• Streetscape Design
• Urban Forestry
• Storm Water Management
• Open Space Inventory
• Water Conservation
• Outdoor Environment Design
• Evidence -Based Design
PLACEWORKS
Primary Contact
Karen Gulley
Vice President and Managing
Principal, Design
PLACEWORKS
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana CA 92707
714.966.9220 x2347
[email protected]
Company Ownership
100% Employee Owned California
Corporation
Incorporated: September 5, 1975
Office Locations
• Santa Ana (Corporate Headquarters
and lead office for this project)
• Los Angeles
• Ontario
• San Luis Obispo
• Berkeley
• Sacramento
Total Employees
Current Number of: 145
Past 7 years: 125 to 135
Hours of Operation
Monday —Friday, 8:00 am -5:00 pm
Website
https://www.placeworks.com
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 1
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
Our broad experience and technical proficiency have given us a keen understanding of the complexities of both public policies and project designs for sustainable development (economically, environmentally, and equitably). In addition to providing the requisite technical support for wide-ranging tasks, we often serve as a sounding board for clients to explore design and economic strategies and their environmental and regulatory implications.
PlaceWorks' approach to all projects focuses on collaboration. Our policy planners and designers continually confer with our CEQA practitioners and technical specialists to create responsive and site -sensitive plans that satisfy regulatory demands. Whether preparing a specific plan or master plan, conducting public outreach, or conducting a corridor study, we serve as integral partners in a host of planning processes.
Qualifications
Local Project Experience. See below for a partial listing of projects with the Northern Service Plan Area of Orange County. The client for each listed project was the city of location, except where otherwise noted.
Projects denoted with (*) were led by or featured Karen Gulley as key staff.
Placentia
• Chapman Corridor Regulation Requirements & Design Guidelines* • TOD, Corridor Planning, and Placemaking for the Cities of Placentia, Fullerton, Brea, and La Habra* (Clients were SLAG and OCTA) 2009 • Centerpointe at Placentia (Packing House District TOD) Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
"PlaceWorks' creative thinking
was grounded in their
expertise in land planning,
urban design, and the realities
of development. They guided
a process that resulted in a
unified vision and a set of
common goals, which will be
the foundation for a future
Specific Plan."
— Charles Kovac
former Principal Planner, City of Fullerton
Fullerton
• Fullerton Downtown Core and Corridors*
• The Edge —Economic Analysis for redevelopment of the former Beckman Coulter facility at Harbor Boulevard and Lambert Road • Fullerton College Connector Streetcar Feasibility Study* (Clients were SCAG and City)
• Fullerton Smart Growth 2030 (Clients were SCAG and City) • Fullerton Hub Mixed Use Project EIR
Anaheim
• Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan and EIR*
• Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan and EIR*
• Anaheim General Plan Update, Zoning Code Update,* and EIR Brea
• Central City Core and General Plan Market Analysis*
• Brea Connecting the Core Active Transportation Plan*
2 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
Yorba Linda
• Savi Ranch Land Use and Mobility Visioning*
• Savi Ranch Land Use and Mobility Plan*
• Savi Ranch Zone Change Initiative Project*
• Yorba Linda General Plan Goals & Policies Evaluation
Stanton
• Stanton Plaza Specific Plan and EIR*
• Stanton Housing Element Update and Associated CEQA
• Stanton Mapping Updates
Los Alamitos
• Los Alamitos Commercial Corridors Plan* (Clients were SCAG and the City) • Los Alamitos Town Center Strategic Plan and Urban Design • Los Alamitos General Plan and EIR
Buena Park
• Beach Boulevard Entertainment District Concepts
• Buena Park Entertainment District EIR
La Palma
• La Palma General Plan and EIR*
Orange
• City of Orange TDR Feasibility Study
Economic, Market, and Fiscal Analysis. PlaceWorks grounds its economic development work in a thorough analysis and understanding of the economic and market forces underlying each project that we undertake. Too often in California, the term "economic development" is used to refer to real estate development. Our practice targets economic and employment growth that drive the demand for all types of real estate development. Without growth in jobs and income, there is little need for real estate development. Led by PlaceWorks' Chief Economist, Steve Gunnells, we prepared the Development Impact Fee Study for Long Beach's Midtown Specific Plan and the Dana Point Market & Fiscal Analysis.
Award -Winning Public Engagement. The PlaceWorks team is invested not only in producing plans that are adoptable and implementable, but in developing an open, engaging, and interactive process that truly incorporates feedback from the public. PlaceWorks' work is founded on the principle that the success of a project lies with the ownership and involvement of community members. We integrate technical expertise with a community -based approach, developing a thorough understanding of the issues and challenges that are relevant to each community. "PlaceWorks immersed
themselves into our
community, establishing
trust among key stakeholders
and public officials, and the
Corridors Plan showed a great
deal of respect to the past,
present, and future of our
City."
— Steve Mendoza
former Community Development Director,
City of Los Alamitos
Create neighborhood distract that builds upon loc
businesses and clusters new uses.
Balance potential intensity increases with shared
parking concepts.
Complete uniform d sidewalks and improve
landscaping to improve sidewalks
pedestrian environment.
Improve gateways at freeway off -ramp and from
north.
PlaceWorks' context -sensitive approach
for the El Camino Real Corridor in
San Clemente included capitalizing
on market forces to replace vacant,
underutilized, and incompatible land
uses.
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 3
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
•µIMPPOVETHEBDULEVARDM
BEACH BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN
Planning Comm nip', Workshop
Monday, June 13, 2016 at SAO p.m.
City Council Clamber 2WS.Anahelm Blvd.
BEACH
BOULEVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN
You are invited to attend a Planning Commission
Workshop on the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan. At
this meeting staff will provide a presentation to the
Planning Commission on the Waft hand use plan. as
well as an oven I Progress update on the project
The workshop will be hem in conjunction with the
Planning Commission erring, the Coma
n Chamber. located the first floor Wiry Malt. Fa all
the lateg information rent to this prn,at. pleats
Anaheim's Beach Boulevard Specific
guides future development along a
1.5 -mile stretch of Beach Boulevard
between the cities of Buena Park and
Stanton.
Transit -Oriented Design & Planning and Connectivity Plans.
PlaceWorks is a leader in transit -oriented planning, with more than 60 plans for station areas and corridors involving commuter rail, light rail, streetcar, BRT, and local bus service. Our TOD work in the Central Valley includes: Southwest Fresno TOD Specific Plan, Gilroy High Speed Rail Station Area Plan Update, Atascadero's El Camino Real Corridor Plan, and the City of Clovis' Shaw Avenue Corridor Plan.
Specific Plans. PlaceWorks is at the forefront of the specific planning practice and have completed more than 300 specific plans for small, medium, and large cities throughout California, including plans tailored around existing and future station areas, downtowns, and along transit corridors. We focus on laying the groundwork for slow, steady change in the urban fabric and on integrating public realm improvements that foster quality places and encourage alternative travel modes. 4 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
Healthy Communities and Environmental Justice. Creating a healthy community requires a thoughtful, systematic, and multilevel approach.
Our comprehensive, healthy -communities planning tailors services to each community's unique needs —environmental scans; food assessments; alcohol and tobacco assessments; air quality assessments; public safety analyses; sustainable planning efforts; parks, recreation, and open space projects; bicycle and pedestrian trails planning; and stand-alone health elements and integrated health policy for general plans.
Geographic Information Systems. GIS mapping and analyses are an integral part of all our services areas. With our skills in spatial data processing and visualization, we can deliver databases, models, web - based applications, and presentation -quality maps that harness the power of GIS. We possess a comprehensive knowledge of municipal GIS and data management practices and over 25 years of technical experience in GIS development, support, and analysis for a wide range of municipal clients.
��urc.uunxa'�
SB 1000
Implementation Toolkit
Healthy Com
PLACEWORKS
83 PLANNING HEALTHY
COMMUNITIES
PLACEWORKS
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 5
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
Experience with References
Client Contact
Joe Lambert
Director of Community and
Economic Development
CITY OF PLACENTIA
401 E. Chapman Ave
Placentia, CA 92870
714.993.8124
[email protected]
Dates of Services
October 2022 —Ongoing
Key Personnel/Subconsultants
Karen Gulley, Suzanne Schwab,
Chad So, Steve Gunnells, Fehr &
Peers, Fuscoe Engineering
Contract Value
$198,138
Detailed descriptions of five recent most relevant projects are provided on the following pages. Additional details about these and other relevant projects can be found in the Appendix.
CHAPMAN CORRIDOR REGULATION REQUIREMENTS AND
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Cohesive and Integrated Corridor Development
PlaceWorks will tailor development standards and design guidelines for Chapman Avenue and the immediate neighborhood. By implementing new mixed -use General Plan land use designations, the corridor will allow for an integrated land use pattern that encourages multimodal travel, walkability, mixed -use development, mid -density residential, public/private open space opportunities, and high -quality urban design that incentives redevelopment.
The goal is to encourage a network of cohesive development that revitalizes the corridor, provides a path to the Old Town and Packing House Districts, and anchors the westerly city boundary with the City's Civic Center. PlaceWorks is leading community outreach and preparation of this plan, which is expected to be completed in July.
Building Footprint: 33,655 SF
Stories: 4
Units: 100
Du/Ac. 62
Parting Spaces: 233 14 story structure)
Building Footprint: 33,655 SF
Stories: 3
Units: 26
Du/Ac: IS
Parking Spaces: 52 surface +26 garage
Opportunity to allow for rre idenhal to mm
rs louses such as snag pncce (Le
mumor romes ror law omca. aemisr. ea.
Mixed -use oppcdonity sits
MIEN Commercial opportunity site
(busing opporunitysite
r.s Ole Town- Existing Zoning
] Too -Exls9tg zonln9
moN 0. Center oppcomity site
Buiding Footprint: 26,160 SF
Stories: 3
Units: 40
Du/Ac: 25
Parking Spaces: 76 surface + AO garage
6 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
FAIRVIEW DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER VISIONING,
SPECIFIC PLAN, AND EIR
Opportunity Site Planning for Mixed Use, Mixed Income Housing In September of 2023, the City of Costa Mesa initiated the preparation of a Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report to coordinate and facilitate transition of the Fairview Developmental Center (FDC) to a mixed use, mixed income housing community. The FDC is a State-owned property and the State Department of Developmental Services, State Department of General Services, and the City of Costa Mesa will partner on future disposition of the site.
The City's 6th Cycle Housing Element lists the FDC as a housing opportunity site and estimates 2,300 housing units for the location.
Through this process the State will likely sell or lease the FDC site to an owner/developer who would develop the site consistent with the Specific Plan. The FDC Housing Plan is an exciting opportunity for the City to plan for a new neighborhood for Costa Mesa.
Client Contact
Phayvanh Nanthavongdouangsy
Principal Planner
CITY OF COSTA MESA
Economic and Development Services
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
714.754.5611
[email protected]
Dates of Services
August 2023 —Ongoing
Key Personnel/Subconsultants
Karen Gulley, Suzanne Schwab, Steve
Gunnells, Nicole Vermilion, Fehr &
Peers, Fuscoe Engineering
Contract Value
$2,038,110
FAIRVIEW
DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER
SPECIFIC PLAN
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS
7 Qualifications, Related Experience and References
Client Contact
Elizabeth Binsack
Community Development Director
CITY OF TUSTIN
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
714.573.3106
[email protected]
Dates of Services
June 2013 July 2017
Key Personnel/Subconsultants
Karen Gulley, Suzanne Schwab, Steve
Gunnells, Fehr & Peers
$278,708
Contract Value
(TUSTIN
LEGACY
TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN
Re -visioning Infill Development Opportunities
Former Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin, an area now known as Tustin Legacy, is one of the largest infill development opportunity sites in Orange County. PlaceWorks (formerly The Planning Center) completed the original MCAS Tustin Specific Plan in 1999, and in 2013, the City of Tustin decided to take a fresh look at the remaining undeveloped parcels in this area. The re -visioning process focused on a linear park and entertainment uses connecting two of the nation's largest wooden structures -5 -acre blimp hangars —to a nearby Metrolink Station and surrounding and future development.
The amended Specific Plan provides quality development standards and guidelines that protect investment yet are flexible for changing market conditions. The amended plan focuses on new zoning for key planning areas that total 870 acres of vacant/underutilized land. A new urban design guidelines section provides guidance for the layout of blocks, site design, architectural character, outdoor spaces, landscaping, and views. Drawing from existing architectural elements and building form, the plan incorporates a hybrid development code, using form -based elements to prescribe a desired result.
PlaceWorks also completed the supplemental environmental impact report (SEIR) for the specific plan amendment. The original specific plan and 2001 DEIS/EIR established a nonresidential land use trip budget to manage the forecast vehicular trips. This budget was carefully maintained in the SEIR by reallocating trips between planning areas as needed to ensure the specific plan amendment would not impact the overall trip budget.
LEGEND
Tustin City Limit
- - Specific Plan eoundai
I I Mixed -Use Transit
I Mixed -Use Urban
J Commercial
Commercial / Basins
Residential
I Park
(\\\\ Linear Park Overlay
I I Transitional/Emerger
f� EdvcationVillage
L 1 Existing R.O.W.
Proposed R.O.W.
I PA. i Planning Area
8 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
BEACH BOULEVARD CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AND EIR
The Heart of West Anaheim
We have reassembled our team from the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan (BBSP). This corridor plan pioneered new mixed -use zoning designations and corridor housing types along a 1.5 -mile segment of Beach Boulevard in Anaheim. The BBSP area is beginning to come alive, replacing problem motels and underutilized sites with new developments —such as 39 Commons, a new retail center, and Nolin, a new townhome community. Fehr and Peers as well as Fuscoe partnered with us to create streetscape and infrastructure plans for the area to support intensification of development, increase safety, and create a sense of place for this community.
Our robust outreach effort was tailored to the demographics of the area. With large household size and roughly 30 percent of household members under the age of 20, we developed a roadshow and partnered with the area high school's government and economics classes to discuss their ideas for the future of their community. Using an online platform, we asked the students to continue to engage with us and to encourage their families to participate as well. We received 365 responses. We provided additional opportunities to learn about the project and provide input through our community advisory committee, developer roundtable, and pop-up booths at existing community events.
Ultimately, the input we received helped to shape the plan, and the approval process with the city was supported by the community.
Client Contact
Susan Kim, AICP
Former Principal Planner at City of
Anaheim.
Now: Director of Community and
Economic Development
CITY OF LA HABRA
110 E. La Habra Blvd.
La Habra CA 90631
562.383.4100
[email protected]
Dates of Services
August 2015 —November 2018
Key Personnel/Subconsultants
Karen Gulley, Suzanne Schwab, Fehr
& Peers, Fuscoe
Contract Value
$775,920
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 9
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
Client Contact
Kelly Gleason
Senior Planner
CITY OF ATASCADERO
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero 93422
805.470.3448
[email protected]
Dates of Services
2018 -2020
Key Personnel/Subconsultants
Karen Gulley, Steve Gunnells
Contract Value
$174,904
The El Camino Plan
City of Alascaaero
THE EL CAMINO PLAN
Creating a Regional Identity
The EI Camino Real is the gateway to Atascadero's downtown. The look, feel, and content of this five -mile corridor has a significant bearing on the city's regional identity, local character, and economic health.
Although it has great potential to be a vibrant downtown for shopping, dining, and small businesses, it has been slow to recover from the Great Recession. With high vacancies and nondescript buildings, it currently struggles to compete with nearby Paso Robles and other commercial areas.
PlaceWorks developed the EI Camino Plan, whose goal is to identify future land uses and guide urban design concepts with circulation improvements. This project will set a new course for EI Camino Real with a combination of strategic public realm investments and incentives for new development. We have provided the city with a custom strategy and set of tools to transform this automobile -oriented, regional corridor into a multimodal economic hub.
Elements of the corridor plan include the formation of new districts; modernization of zoning regulations; dynamic site design concepts for key areas; contemporary architectural style guidelines that also honor local history; streetscape design; and bicycle and pedestrian improvements to address safety concerns. The plan also includes strategies for business attraction, retention, and investment. . N ot
sr•EE..•EE•.LE..E ® ® s
EL CAMINO REAL IMPROVEMENT IDEAS
1t�
10 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
Subconsultants
Fehr & Peers (Traffic/Parking)
Fehr & Peers is an S -Corporation based in California, with approximately 380 employees in 20 offices across the Country. The work for the City of Placentia will be performed from its Orange County Office. Fehr & Peers has specialized in providing transportation planning and engineering services to public and private sector clients since 1985. It develops creative, cost-effective, and results -oriented solutions to planning and design problems associated with all modes of transportation. It offers clients the right combination of leading -edge technical skills and extensive knowledge of the communities in which it works to deliver comprehensive solutions and superior client service. Its staff are nationally -recognized experts who routinely publish original research, serve on national committees, and teach courses to others in the industry. They do this while maintaining a commitment to translating those techniques into practical solutions. Fehr & Peers takes a creative, data -driven approach to each of its practice areas:
• CEQA & Transportation Impact Analysis
• Travel behavior & forecasting
• Multimodal operations & simulation
• Transit planning
• Bicycle 8c pedestrian planning
• Sustainable transportation
• Freight systems & airports
• Integrated land use & transportation plans
• Conceptual street & trail design
• Transportation engineering & ITS design
Clients hire Fehr & Peers because of its commitment to being the best at what it does. Is lives out this commitment in three distinct ways. First, it invests heavily in its culture to ensure that it is attracting and retaining the best and brightest staff in the industry. Second, it has a robust, internally -funded research and development program that enables it to develop new analytical methods and advance the state of the practice.
And third, it surveys every client at the completion of every project to assess their satisfaction and to identify areas for improvement. Fehr & Peers is very proud of the impact this commitment has had on the communities it has been fortunate to serve.
Recent relevant projects include:
• Chapman Corridor Specific Plan, Placentia, CA North Orange County Collaborative SB 743 Implementation
• CollegeTown Specific Plan & EIR
Details about these projects can be found in the Appendix.
FEHRif'PEERS
Point of Contact
Paul Hermann PE
Senior Associate
FEHR & PEERS
101 Pacifica, Suite 300
Irvine CA 92618
949.308.6318
[email protected]
https://www.fehrandpeers.com
Company Ownership
Company Type: California
S -Corporation
Incorporated: 1985
Office Locations
• Orange County (Work for this project
will be performed from this office)
• Boise
• Boulder
• Dallas
• Denver
• Long Beach
• Los Angeles
• Oakland
• Orlando
• Petaluma
• Portland
• Riverside
• Roseville
• Sacramento
• Salt Lake City
• San Diego
• San Francisco
• San Jose
• Seattle
• Stockton
• Tacoma
• Walnut Creek
• Washington DC
• Walnut Creek
(Corporate)
Total Employees
Current Number of: 380
Hours of Operation
Monday —Friday, 8:00 am -5:00 pm
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 11
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
Fuscoe Engineering
i$ FLOE
I.
F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G
Point of Contact
Ian Adam CPSWQ, QSD
Principal / Stormwater
FUSCOE ENGINEERING
15535 Sand Canyon Ave, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
949.474.1960
[email protected]
Company Ownership
Company Type: California Employee
Stock Ownership Plan
Incorporated: 1992
Office Locations
• Irvine (Work for this project will be
performed primarily from this office)
• Los Angeles
• Ontario
• San Diego
Total Employees
Current Number of: 190
Hours of Operation
Monday —Friday, 8:00 am -5:00 pm
Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. (Fuscoe) provides civil engineering for land development, public infrastructure and General & Specific Plan EIRs, using an eco-adaptive® approach. Specialty practices include survey & mapping services; water quality assurance; sustainable engineering; and geospatial technology. Fuscoe has delivered a broad range of services for numerous General Plan & Specific Plan EIRs for Southern California cities and agencies. Project assignments have included these services:
• Identifying opportunities and feasibility of proposed land uses and revitalization projects in urban, suburban and rural settings • Evaluating zoning and land use changes on infrastructure systems • Identifying measures to reduce potential impacts of proposed developments for construction and post -construction conditions • Providing infrastructure analysis, identifying infrastructure system deficiencies and offering recommendations
• Preparing hydrology, flood control, sewer and water quality technical studies related to proposed land use changes
• Prepare Water Supply Assessments and coordinate findings with local and regional wholesale water providers.
• Evaluate implications of mandatory RHNA housing units on local and regional water supply providers and assess impacts on local and regional wastewater treatment providers
• Drainage, sewer and water master planning
• Developing storm water runoff management, grading and infrastructure plans
• Providing impact assessments for CEQA compliance
Recent relevant projects include:
• Arrow Highway Corridor Specific Plan
• Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan
• City of Santa Ana General Plan Update
• Anaheim Canyon Specific Urban Greening Plan
• Beach Boulevard Specific Plan
Details about these projects can be found in the Appendix. 12 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
Disclosures
PlaceWorks has never filed for bankruptcy, has no planned office closures or mergers, nor any conflicts of interest that may affect our ability to perform the required duties.
PlaceWorks has never been debarred, suspended, nor otherwise declared ineligible to contract with any federal, state, or local public agency.
Litigation
PlaceWorks has one claim in the past seven years, which will have no effect on our performance or completion of this program.
The claim has to do with a defect case involving the Embarcadero Bridge over the Lake Merritt Channel in the City of Oakland. General Contractor, Flatiron West Inc., filed the initial complaint on October 29, 2019 against the City of Oakland for breach of contract. The City of Oakland cross -complained against TY Lin International Group and AECOM on July 21, 2020. TY Lin/AECOM subsequently filed a cross - complaint against DC&E/PlaceWorks on March 5, 2021. Our pre - construction planning role on the project ended around 2007. The claims against DC&E/PlaceWorks include breach of contract, indemnity, and declaratory relief. In March 2024 a settlement was reached, and the lawsuit was dismissed with no admission of fault on our part.
Terminated Contracts
Contract No. C-124573 and No. C-134714, Project No. CTY-07.0, valued at $798,782, Southwest Community Plans EIR I Terminated 10/18/23.
This contract was terminated by the City for convenience and with full agreement by PlaceWorks. The City stated in its letter of October 18, 2023, "Final payment will be issued on a pro rata basis for deliverables properly invoiced and accepted by City"
Contact(s): Maria Ortiz, Management Analyst, City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning, 200 N. Spring Street, Rm. 575, Los Angeles, CA 900125, 213.978.1290
City of Irvine. Contract No. 10901, Project No. COI -45.1, valued at $594,041: Irvine General Plan Update and EIR I Terminated 12/08/2021 Without Cause. This contract was terminated by the City for convenience, and with full agreement by PlaceWorks. All outstanding invoices were paid, and the City stated in its letter of December 8, 2021, "We want to thank your team for the service provided on the General Plan Update. We appreciate your efforts and longstanding partnership with the City."
Contact(s): Kerwin Lau, Manager of Planning Services, City of Irvine, 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606, 949.724.7421
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 13
Qualifications, Related Experience and References
City of Pasadena. Contract No. PRA -08, valued at $1,320,850: Pasadena General Plan Implementation I Terminated 09/04/2019 Without Cause. The Pasadena agreement was terminated by the City and with agreement by PlaceWorks, due to a change the direction the City wanted to take. All invoices were paid in a timely manner following the termination, and as stated in its letter to PlaceWorks, the contract was terminated "pursuant to provision 9.17 —Termination for Convenience (Without Cause)."
Contact(s): David Reyes, Planning Director, City of Pasadena, 100 N.
Garfield Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101, 626.744.4650
Contract No. COFC-01, valued at $255,515: Foster City Park System Master Plan I Terminated 05/21/2019 without cause. The Foster City agreement was terminated for convenience by the City due to City Council's change in vision for the project that allows them to keep the work in-house. All invoices were promptly paid in full, and in their termination letter, they said, "As indicated in the Resolution, and as 1 would like to strongly reiterate here, the reason for the contract termination is solely a change in vision by the City Council. This action in no way reflects the quality or quantity of work performed by PlaceWorks, Inc. or its staff. Indeed, the City and its staff have found working with PlaceWorks to be both successful and rewarding."
Contact(s): Jennifer Liu, Parks & Recreation, 610 Foster City Boulevard, Foster City, CA 94404, 650.286.3380, Alternate: Jeff Moneda, City Manager, 650.577.0983
14 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
STAFFING
PHYSICAL • OCCUPATIONAL • SPEECH
STAFFING
We have assembled a team of talented, enthusiastic, and experienced planners, designers, environmental experts, and engineers to assist the City of Placentia in leading this project to a successful conclusion. Every member of this team has worked together on previous projects. Most worked together on the Chapman Corridor Plan, including subconsultants, Fehr & Peers and Fuscoe.
Project Team Organization
CITY OF PLACENTIA
PLACEWORKS
KAREN GULLEY
Managing Principal, Design
Principal -in -Charge
SUZANNE SCHWAB AICP
Associate Principal
Project Manager & Outreach Lead
PLANNING, DESIGN, OUTREACH
ErCHAD SO AICP I Associate
Assistant Project Manager & Outreach
STEVE GUNNELLS I Chief Economist
Economics
4..r LEO DiPIERRO I Project Planner
GIS
NICOLE VERMILION I Principal
As Needed CEQA Principal Advisor
and AQ/GHG/Energy QA/QC
CEQA COMPLIANCE AND TECHNICAL ANALYSES
IMALIA DURAND I Associate Principal
CEQA Principal
EMILY PARKS I Associate
Air Quality/GHG/Energy Lead
SUBCONSULTANTS
ICHRISTHI MROSLA I Associate
CEQA Project Manager
CHRIS SHIELDS I Senior Associate
Noise/Vibration Lead
ekt
STEVE BUSH PE I Senior Engineer
Water Supply Assessment
Fehr & Peers
Transportation, Mobility, Parking
JASON PACK PE I Principal
Transportation Principal
PAUL HERRMANN PE I Senior Associate
Transportation Project Manager
Fuscoe Engineering
Civil Engineering, Infrastructure
IAN ADAM cPSWQ, QSD/P I Principal, Stormwater Manager
Principal/Stormwater Manager
SUE WILLIAMS CPMSM I Sr. Water Resources Specialist
Project Manager, Water Resources
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 17
Staffing
Key Personnel
Brief bios describing staff qualifications. We have determined that each of the team members has availability for this project. The anticipated percentage of time for each person is shown in the budget spreadsheet.
Resumes are provided in the Appendix.
PlaceWorks
IWHERE DO YOU LIVE AND WORK?
�,Pla.....Ir woe* •n.
I live eunkle the ( City
outside tAe
city of Placentia. City of Placentia.
o•
..
WHAT SHOULD THE STUDY AREA INCLUDE?
The Proje�„.,nd.ws the
Identityarea thet
Corridor. This plan will guide
development within the
Corridor's pro,. boundary.
d. a l:;�nd,' e.
Add Stickers In the
Areas Below
.
INCLUDE
..
DONT
INCLUDE
WHAT TYPES OF USES WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE?
3 LAND USE
KAREN GULLEY I Managing Principal, Design, has a
talent for strategy and innovative problem solving
that has been honed by over 25 years of
experience. Her skill with all facets of community
planning and design for private and public sector
clients expands the opportunities for creative
solutions. As the company's Transportation
Practice Area Leader, she has developed a solid practice in TOD, infill development, and corridor revitalization. She specializes in assisting local communities with evaluating the potential for transit -oriented development associated with Metrolink and BRT. Her work ranges from vision plans to implementation strategies, each developed in a collaborative effort with city staff, transit agencies, and the public. She regularly facilitates public meetings and workshops and is adept at establishing a rapport with her audience and communicating complex and often controversial issues in a clear, accurate manner. Karen provides expertise in project visioning and implementation, and enjoys the challenges of project processing, negotiating conditions of approval, responding to political considerations, and handling communication between stakeholders.
SUZANNE SCHWAB AICP I Associate Principal, will
serve as Project Manager and will be responsible
for the day-to-day management of the project.
Suzanne is a seasoned project manager having led
several corridor and specific plan projects. Her
NJ most recent completed project was adopted in
��. April for the Saint John's Master Plan Entitlement
and Development Agreement in Santa Monica. Her expertise is in specific plans, healthy community planning, and corridor/ transit oriented plans. This project will be Suzanne's primary project as she wraps up the Wine County Specific Plan with the City of Yucaipa.
Suzanne is collaborative in her approach to planning, she will successfully lead this team through any complex or controversial issues that arise.
18 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
CHAD SO AICP I Associate Designer, works on
urban design, landscape design, planning, and
creative community outreach projects across the
state. Chad brings to PlaceWorks and his projects a
background in landscape architecture and a deep
passion for urban design. He develops urban
design and streetscape design concepts; first/last
mile plans for transit stations; and multimodal strategic and specific plans. He also creates graphics, maps, and diagrams that are incorporated into plans and used to present planning and urban design concepts to clients, public meetings, and community workshops.
STEVE GUNNELLS I Chief Economist, works with
communities to bridge the gap between long-
range planning policies and economic
development —with community organizations and
special districts to fund and implement priority
projects —and with developers to guide project
decision -making and obtain entitlements based on
sound economic and market analysis. As PlaceWorks' in-house economist, he plays a role in a great many of the firm's active projects.
He focuses on crafting plans, policies, and development projects that are grounded in regional and global economic realities. He helps his clients leverage market forces to achieve their goals.
LEO DiPIERRO I Project Planner, GIS Analyst,
assists with GIS- and planning- related tasks on a
variety of projects in the Bay Area and beyond. Leo
is well -versed in planning, interdisciplinary
research, writing/formatting, GIS, and analytical/
technical skills. He is also experienced in
interpretation and collection of data from multiple
sources, and has the ability to synthesize material to communicate findings effectively and concisely.
NICOLE VERMILION I Principal, combines broad
perspective and big -picture thinking with a good
technical grounding to find workable solutions to
environmental constraints. She is a skilled project
manager and smoothly guides difficult and
controversial projects to completion. She oversees
project staffing and timing for the air quality, GHG,
and noise technical team's impact evaluations under CEQA. She is responsible for expanding and fine-tuning the team based on changes in technology, legislation, and client needs and for ensuring that PlaceWorks' air quality and GHG studies are defensible and consistent with recent case law. She closely follows the rapid changes in Staffing
DOWNTOWN
'4ORELINE
r i
ON PLAN
Central City Core Specific Plan
MARKET ANALYSIS FINDINGS
ECONOMIC AND MARKET PROFILE
Foundation for the Dana Point General Plan
BREA MALL MIXED USE PROJECT
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
VOLUME I
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 20[9060299
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS
19 Staffing
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT — CIVIC CENTER
SPECIFIC PLAN
PRELIMINARY DRAFT - SUBJECT TO CHANGE I JULY 2022
Figure 6 -Proposed Zoning Districts
111F I—LI
DTI
-I I r I�
lI
I
,,,I
r
LHI ELa_
�$
, �
S, ha.1
LIJ t*L
I
._ t .'
i
i_—''';-. s
II
A
I
I II
I L
I—
tl
-a I I I I I
r
liIII
,� I I I —I
—o o,;, '
requirements and the latest information on CEQA thresholds and analysis methodology. She has performed numerous greenhouse gas emissions inventories for individual projects as well as citywide emissions inventories for general plans.
MALIA DURAND I Associate Principal, will serve
as CEQA principal and oversee the CEQA approval
process. Malia is a highly skilled environmental
land use planner with over 16 years of experience
in environmental land use and urban planning. She
manages CEQA/NEPA public and private projects
for a wide variety of project types and sizes and is
an adept problem solver. She has produced and overseen the production of numerous environmental projects as well as planning and zoning projects throughout Southern California. Malia is responsible for project quality and defensibility, project management, mentoring staff, and helping to maintain and advance our environmental practice in Orange County and the Inland Empire.
CHRISTHI MROSLA I Associate, has experience
authoring CEQA compliance documents and
advancing entitlement applications for all land use
types, especially industrial developments in
Southern California and the Inland Empire. She has
experience creating and managing the project
consultant team to prepare technical reports,
architectural/civil plans, and other various requirements to achieve CEQA compliance and project approval on over 3.5. million square feet of approved developments. She interfaces with lead agency contacts, members of the public, and State Clearinghouse representatives.
Christhi has experience with preparing and presenting public meeting presentations.
EMILY PARKS I Associate, is a member of the
Environmental Team's air quality and greenhouse
gas analysis group. She works on a broad array of
environmental planning projects —from mixed -use,
industrial, and transit -oriented design projects to
comprehensive planning projects such as general
plans and specific plans.
20 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
CHRIS SHIELDS I Senior Associate, possesses a
strong background in noise control, noise
propagation, frequency analysis and engineering
practices, coupled with extensive noise synthesis
computer -modeling experience. His work
experience includes the preparation of technical
studies and related sections of CEQA and NEPA
documents for commercial, industrial, residential, mixed -use recreation, educational, infrastructure, and other development projects. Chris' experience includes noise analyses for federal, state, and local agencies with the use of computer models published by the EPA, FHWA, and Caltrans.
DINA EL CHAMMAS GASS PEQSD I Senior
Engineer, has experience in the fields of
sustainability, environmental engineering, and
sustainable watershed management; has helped
prepare environmental impact statements for
large construction sites and performed field
baseline studies and data modeling and
assessment, working with EPA, EU, and WHO environmental legislation and regulations.
STEVE BUSH PE I Senior Engineer, has completed
hydrology, water supply assessment and utilities
systems analyses for a variety of projects, including
residential development, industrial warehousing,
and schools projects. He coordinates regularly with
public agencies regarding pipeline risk analyses,
flooding impacts, and other safety hazards for the
preparation of CEQA sections.
Fehr & Peers
JASON D. PACK PE I Principal, has an extensive
background in travel demand forecasting, traffic
operations assessment (including micro -simulation
assessment), VMT analysis, big data analysis, transit
ridership forecasting, and transportation impact
studies involving NEPA and CEQA. He uses his
experience and the resources of the F&P to help
clients answer their toughest questions related to mobility. His recent work has included forecasting and operations assessment for large infrastructure improvements, developing recommendations for SB 743 implementation, assisting agencies with establishing VMT banks/ exchanges, emergency evacuation assessment to respond to new legislative requirements (SB 99 and AB 747) and development of Staffing
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 21
Staffing
NOCC+ AO* O*
North Orange County Collaborative VMT Traffic Study Screening Tool Rateetkinnoolon
CONTACT• STATUS
O
innovative transportation policies to assist cities with advancing transportation into the future.
PAUL HERRMANN PE I Senior Associate, has 13
years of experience in transportation engineering
and transportation planning at Fehr & Peers. Prior
to Fehr & Peers, Paul worked at the City of Corona
in the Traffic Engineering Department for two
years. He has led a wide variety of projects
including traffic studies, infrastructure projects,
travel demand forecasting, parking and circulation studies, and long- range development plans. Paul is an expert in SB 743 Implementation and VMT Analysis for CEQA projects. He serves clients throughout Southern California with projects throughout the SCAG region.
Fuscoe Engineering
IAN ADAM cPswQ, QSD/P I Principal, Stormwater
Manager, is a firm Principal and Fuscoe's
Stormwater Management team leader. His
specialty is water resources, with an emphasis in
water quality regulations, sea -level rise policy,
Clean Water Act Citizen Suits and resource agency
negotiation. Ian has worked on over 60 General
Plan Updates and Specific Plans throughout California to assist municipalities and developers with infrastructure assessments, zoning approvals, EIR technical support and long term capital improvement planning. Ian has also worked extensively in the California Coastal Zone, processing Coastal Development Permits, addressing Sea -Level Rise technically and politically, and working in partnership with Coastal Staff on individual projects, Specific Plans and Local Coastal Programs.
SUSAN WILLIAMS PE,QSD/P I Technical Manager,
has 25+ years of experience in the civil engineering
field of water resources for land development and
public works. Susan has provided services for a
wide range of projects including mixed use
developments, affordable housing, retail/
commercial, master planned communities and
kik SO
various parks. More recently, Sue has been overseeing a team of engineers perform infrastructure assessments and CEQA technical reports for various specific plans and general plan updates. 22 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WORKPLAN /
TECHNICAL APPROACH
Maga
WORKPLAN/TECHNICAL APPROACH
Project Understanding
Placentia is known as a pleasant place to live; it is lesser known as a place for commerce and recreation but that sentiment is changing.
The City has embarked on several significant planning projects in recent years including Old Town Revitalization Plan, TOD plans I and II, Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan, and now the update to Specific Plan 5 (SP -5). In each of those plans an economic objective is addressed, whether it be commercial growth through the expansion of mixed - use, retail, hospitality, or population growth by adding capacity for new residential units. SP -5 is another great opportunity for the City to continue to allow for these growth opportunities.
As identified in the RFP, the future Metrolink Station also plays into the City's growth trajectory and the adjacency of the SP -5 area to the TOD "Packing House District" makes it a smart next step to signal to property owners and the development community that the area is ready for change. Coupled with the draw of nearby Disneyland and other large- scale entertainment and sports opportunities in Anaheim, the location of the properties with easy access to the 57 freeway also makes the area suitable for redevelopment. The established Specific Plan provides standards for development and sets permitted land uses but falls short for placemaking, which includes high quality site and building design.
This proposal provides a solid approach to update the Specific Plan and ensure that CEQA clearance streamlines the process for future development. All with the goal of making this a unique area for people to visit —whether they are locals or visitors to Placentia. Our keys to success include:
• Analyze the current SP -5 standards, permitted uses, and existing development to assess what is and is not working.
• Find the right balance between flexibility and design/development control with new standards and introduce design guidelines. • Engage the community in meaningful ways, including property owners and area business operators, to gain insights about their future and ideas for the area.
• Set the stage for the future Streetscape Master Plan, Development Impact Fee Study, and establishment of a Community Facility District.
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 25
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
PlaceWorks' Approach
• Listen to the community and decision makers.
• Partner with staff to identify what has and has not worked for the current SP -5.
• Gain insights through a market analysis, optional task. • Capitalize on the momentum of CCRP, TOD, and Old Town along with our knowledge of the City and working relationship with staff to efficiently and timely update SP -5 within the City's identified time frame.
Scope of Work
The tasks below respond the City's RFP and have been further refined to meet the objectives of the SP -5 update based on our team's experience in the city and best practices for completing a specific plan update.
Where overlap occurs in the task schedule, a WorkPlan callout box has been used to identify when they are initiated and where tasks continue to inform other parts of the project. A proposed project schedule is also included in this proposal depicting project process and order of tasks.
Task 1. Kick-off and Project Management
Task 1. WorkPlan
• Review background documents
• Initiate Community Engagement
• Establish the proposed project
boundary
• Optional: Begin Market Analysis
A successful project needs a good foundation. Task 1 allocates time for the PlaceWorks team to meet with staff, kick off the project, and hold regular meetings and check -ins. Our team will also get up to speed with existing conditions analysis in this first task.
1.1 Kick-off Meeting / Background Review and Goal
To kick off the project, our team will meet with an interdepartmental group of City staff to discuss the overall scope for the SP -5 update. It is anticipated that this group will continue to work closely with our team to assist with data collection and community engagement. PlaceWorks will develop the kick-off meeting agenda with city staff to include the project's goals, objectives, finalize tasks, and timeline.
1.2 Existing Conditions Analysis (Story Map)
Similar to the Chapman Corridor effort, we will use Story Maps, an ArcGIS program that allows the online presentation of geographic data and photos. The Story Map will contain an overview of the current SP -5 area including existing land use, proposed/ allowed uses under SP -5, and a high-level demographic summary for the area. Fehr & Peers will prepare maps of existing and planned transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the area to identify gaps and opportunities. Additionally, Fehr & Peers will support the team by preparing a safety review of historical collision data in the study area to identify trends and countermeasures. 26 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
1.3 Project Management and Communication
A successful project requires coordination and communication.
PlaceWorks will lead the day-to-day project management for the SP -5 update. Regular communication via Zoom calls and email will ensure all members of the team are in the know. We will establish a protocol for email communication, identifying who from the City and the consultant team will be part of the communication. Our project manager will use a variety of tools, including an ongoing budget and schedule tracking template to ensure we stay on track.
Deliverable(s):
» Meeting agendas and summaries, maintain schedule, budget tracking, and invoice reporting
Task 2. Community Engagement
Community engagement is an important component of any planning process. Engaging the Placentia community will give us insight into how residents, visitors, and businesses view the SP -5 area and their ideas for improving it. This scope includes two methods for engaging the community, the first through hybrid community workshops and the second by supporting regular communication through the City's website and social media channels.
2.1 Hybrid Community Workshops
This task consists of facilitation of up to 2 community engagement events to help inform development of the Specific Plan Update. Based on our knowledge of the Placentia community, our team is proposing a hybrid in -person workshop/open house.
The hybrid workshop will consist of a short presentation and then time to have in-depth discussion as attendees circulate booths and participate in quick activities. This format gives flexibility for community members to participate at their leisure and to engage for the amount of time they have available. Our team will develop interactive and engaging activities with eye-catching materials, including but not limited to large scale maps, posters, and handouts.
The intent for any format of an in -person session is to facilitate friendly and casual interactions while gaining valuable input for the SP -5 update.
The hybrid workshops could be held within the project boundary, such as the Placentia Corporate Center, at a nearby entertainment/hospitality use such as The Bruery Tasting Room, or at a City -hosted space where the community is already familiar with attending events.
Virtual community workshops could be considered and have the potential of reaching a broader audience, allowing the community to participate remotely via Zoom. Virtual community workshops may Task 2. WorkPlan
• Hold Community Workshop #1
• Hold City Council Study Session
• Finalize boundary
• Identify Land Use Changes
• Optional: Finalize Market Analysis
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 27
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
include a presentation followed by discussion breakout rooms. Virtual white boards and other graphic materials such as maps, photos, and drawings would also be used to further breakout room discussions.
Regardless of the location or format, we will work with city staff during the kick-off meeting to confirm the appropriate times to schedule these events and identify the format. In addition to the City Council Study Session described in Task 5, Our project schedule includes two proposed times for community events:
• The first is early in the process to inform the community about the project and gain initial ideas.
• A second is later in the process to obtain feedback for proposed uses, standards, and design guidelines.
This task assumes that the City will take the lead to provide and maintain information about the project on the City's website (see Task
2.2 below) and that the City will take the lead to provide or obtain a consultant for translation services (if needed). Additionally, this task allocates time for Fehr & Peers to support the community engagement process. This could include participation in outreach or preparation of materials including proposed cross -sections on Crowther Avenue, Placentia Avenue, Kimberly Avenue, and Orangethorpe Avenue, and/ or alternative analysis at study intersections that reflect proposed facilities.
Deliverable(s):
» Facilitation of up to 2 community events
» Workshop/event materials (printing included in the reimbursable budget)
» Community Engagement Summary
2.2 Web Page and Other Online Content
This task assumes the City will lead development and maintenance of a project web page hosted on the City's website, consistent with other recent planning projects such as the Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan and the Old Town Placentia Revitalization Plan. PlaceWorks will provide content as needed to keep the web page up to date. Examples include project narrative briefs, graphics, and project deliverables in pdf or jpeg format.
We will produce other online content to promote awareness of the project. Online content may include a digital project flyer and social media content to drive people to the project web page or promote the community engagement events (see Task 2.1). From time to time we could also post digital polls to ask the community about specific topics. A digital poll would include one or two questions and provide 28 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
an interactive component to the project web page as well as a quick and easy way for community members to get involved. These could be provided through Google Forms or Survey123.
This task assumes that the City will take the lead in sharing the digital flyer and social media content through the City's various email lists, social media, newsletters, flyers at City hall, and other outlets as appropriate.
Deliverable(s):
2 hybrid community workshops (open house / workshop) with supporting materials
1 digital project flyer
Up to 3 sets of social media content (1 set includes the same content formatted for various social media outlets such as Facebook, Instagram, and X)
Up to 5 digital poll questions —responses to be documented in the Community Outreach Summary from Task 2.1
Task 3. Identify and Prioritize
Options / Develop the Plan
The subtasks described below will help our team to efficiently and systematically update SP -5, potentially introducing new land uses, refining the project boundary, and establishing a project description for CEQA. Ultimately, this task compiles the work into an Administrative Review Draft and Final Plan.
3.1 Site Testing
Once opportunity or catalytic sites have been identified and agreed upon with City staff, PlaceWorks will test fit various types of development on up to three sites to understand capacity, test the exiting standards, and ensure feasibility of development for the SP -5 area.
3.2 Finalize Boundary
After the community and City council have weighed in on the proposed boundary options, the PlaceWorks team will prepare a final project boundary in GIS. This parcel -based approach will allow us to efficiently create the land use and buildout summary in Task 3.3. We will be able to easily share the boundary and associated GIS data back to the City for incorporation in the City's existing GIS database. This task is also the first step toward drafting a project description, which is necessary to initiate CEQA analysis.
Chapman Corridor
Revitalization Plan
YOU ARE INVITED TO HELP
US PLAN THE FUTURE OF
CHAPMAN AVE!
Task 3. WorkPlan
• Hold Community Workshop #2
• Update Development Standards
• Draft Design Standards and
Guidelines
• Finalize Project Description and
initiate CEQA Analysis
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 29
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
3.3 Land Use Plan and Buildout Summary
The next task to inform the project description is finalizing the land use plan and buildout summary. This task is a critical part of the project process. PlaceWorks will lead the effort, working with staff to identify the appropriate densities and intensities for future development and focusing on increasing capacity for areas that are most likely to change.
This task will also be informed by the Market Analysis if this optional task, described below, is selected.
3.4 Land Use Designations and Permitted Uses
PlaceWorks will refine the updated land use designations from Task 3.3.
This task is likely to occur after the City Council weighs in on the SP -5 update at the Study Session in Task 4.1. Land use definitions will be updated or crafted if needed, and the permitted uses table will be finalized for inclusion in the Administrative Review Draft Plan, as described below.
3.5 Update and Draft Development and Design
Standards
To support creating this unique hub in Placentia, our team will focus on standards and guidelines that reinforce placemaking. PlaceWorks will update the standards for building setbacks, heights, massing requirements, minimum lot sizes, the locations of parking, site access, etc. SP -5 does not contain design guidelines, so our team will craft them as a companion to the revised and new development standards.
Consistent with State law, PlaceWorks will prepare objective design standards for any designations that may include a residential use. The guidelines will be graphically rich and will also include public realm design and other criteria identified through the outreach and planning process.
3.6 Administrative Review Draft Plan
In this task the PlaceWorks team will combine the resulting boundary, updated definitions, permitted uses, and standards into one administrative draft document. Having worked closely with City staff through each of these sections, the intent is to streamline the process and efficiently pull them together in one draft document.
Fehr & Peers will support the administrative draft plan with transportation planning to connect the study area to the future Metrolink Station and nearby residences and businesses. Fehr & Peers will prepare maps of existing and planned transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the area creating a proposed mobility plan.
Fehr & Peers will also prepare up to 12 roadway cross -sections of study area streets (Crowther Avenue, Placentia Avenue, Kimberly Avenue, 30 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
and Orangethorpe Avenue) to present recommendations for roadway network improvements. Recommendations will consider potential parking, potential road diets, access management, alternative bicycle facilities, potential microtransit connections to the nearby attractions, and other multimodal best practices. Fehr & Peers will summarize the results of the assessment in a draft technical memorandum that will inform the mobility section of the SP -5 update, it could also be incorporated as an Appendix to the Plan.
This task culminates in an Administrative Review Draft SP -5 document, it assumes:
• 1 redline and 1 clean draft incorporating changes to the Administrative Review Draft to be used as the "Hearing Draft."
Our team will work with the City and respond to comments on the draft report and finalize the Specific Plan Update in Task 3.7, as described below.
3.7 Hearing Draft / Final Plan
The clean draft resulting from the Administrative Review Draft will become the Hearing Draft. This draft is typically used for posting to City website, City decision maker review, etc.
This task assumes:
• 1 redline and 1 clean draft incorporating changes to the Hearing Review Draft, which will become the "Final" Specific Plan document upon City Council approval in Task 4.2
Deliverable(s):
» Confirmed project boundary, land use designations and definitions, permitted uses, proposed buildout, land use map, and catalytic/ opportunity site sketches —all for incorporation into the Administrative Review Draft and Project Description (for CEQA) » Administrative Review Draft, redline and clean (electronic, Work and PDF)
» Hearing Draft, redline and clean (electronic, Word and PDF), resulting in a Final Adopted Plan
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 31
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
Task 4. Study Session and Public Hearing
Task 4. WorkPlan
• Finalize CEQA Analysis
• City County Hearing to Adopt the
SP -5 Update and Certify the EIR
Keeping City decision makers informed will be an important part of the project process.
4.1 City Council Study Session
During milestones such as confirming the project boundary, land uses changes, and/or selection of a preferred plan, the PlaceWorks team will lead a study session with City Council. We have budgeted for participation in one study session. Our team will create and present a PowerPoint show summarizing work to date, community outreach, and/ or preferred land use plan depending on where we are at in the project process. We will work with staff during the kick-off meeting in Task 1.1 to align this study session with the milestone(s) that works best for the City.
4.2 City Council Adoption Hearing
Once the CEQA process is finalized in Task 5, our team will support City Staff at a City Council Hearing to adopt the SP -5 update and certify the EIR.
Deliverable(s):
» Preparation and participation in one City Council Study Session » Prepartation and participation in one City Council Hearing to adopt SP -5 and Certify the EIR
» Materials for both include a PowerPoint presentation and assistance with the staff report as needed
Optional Task
Market Assessment (OPTIONAL)
How a commercial hub functions on an economic level is key to its overall success. While we recognize that the City may have a strong understanding of its economic outlook, PlaceWorks proposes to conduct a market assessment to answer critical questions that will inform the urban design/land use framework and mobility plan for the SP -5 update.
We believe this is critical to ensuring that the Plan update is rooted in market reality and will be economically sustainable. To better inform our work the market analysis will:
• Quantify the market potential for commercial, entertainment / recreation, and hotel / hospitality businesses by type and supportable amount of building space at buildout for the Plan area. • Identify possible niches that SP -5 could capitalize on to become a distinct destination.
• Provide recommendations for land use changes in the SP -5 area. 32 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
• Describe strategies and funding mechanisms to support existing business and attract new businesses.
The market analysis will describe Placentia's role and potential as a commercial destination in the North Orange County area. It will assess and quantify market demand for potential uses retail commercial, office, entertainment / recreation, and hotel / hospitality uses.
PlaceWorks will collaborate with City staff to identify key issues to cover in the market analysis. We have found that stakeholder interviews conducted soon after the project kick-off are one of the best ways for the team to quickly assess perspectives on area opportunities and challenges. PlaceWorks will coordinate and facilitate interviews with key members of the community. Our team will work with the City to identify business owners, property owners, real estate brokers, developers, and other stakeholders to include in this task. It is important to meet with other commercial property owners and businesses to identify long-term plans for change, issues that may affect their business, and other needs for residents in the area.
We will conduct the market analysis and prepare a draft report in a digital format. We will review the draft report with City staff. Based on input from the review meeting and one round of consolidated comments, we will prepare and submit a final market analysis report in a digital format as a deliverable product. Content and graphics from the report will be incorporated into the Specific Plan. The scope and budget include internal meetings with the consultant team to incorporate guidance and insight from the market analysis into the overall Specific Plan update.
Deliverable(s):
» In -Person Market Analysis Kick-off Meeting (separate from Project Kick-off)
» Up to 5 Stakeholder interviews, insights will be incorporated into the Market Analysis Report
» Virtual Review Meeting with City Staff (via Zoom or Teams) » Administrative Draft Market Analysis Report (digital format in Word and PDF)
» Final Market Analysis Report (digital format in Word and PDF) WorkPlan/Technical Approach
eCOhOn IS+ Talk f ii Is
• Ptyki �wAwnaw0761.1 .
• gea f V' how-i M1] VDII/W.YtLGiNU1i,4
• 5b unlefly. nut, dnM{a.enfs. I -E•
7�.4eLl tnfi ,t7: for Jd',
krca 1 .�
611/..4 k.koustem ndor ,s
To {, dm, Se(vireS. 174-4.41.1,1,.
• 5g• was puk dam{., f
SE., 119 nwrzaW f h'a
K.5 11\1,4+44
(MIAs)
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 33
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
CEQA Approach and Considerations
To provide a cost effective and streamlined CEQA review, we propose preparing a CEQA analysis that tiers off the findings of the 2019 GP EIR. The approved land uses and current boundaries of the SP -5 corridor constitute the approved project. There are two potentially viable CEQA tracks for this project: an Addendum or a Subsequent EIR (SEIR). For both of these options, the impact analysis would focus on the net change between the proposed project and approved project and changes in circumstance since the 2019 GP EIR was certified.
• Addendum Option. An addendum allows the most efficient path for CEQA review because an addendum need not be circulated for public review and does not require Assembly Bill (AB) 52 consultation. The City of Placentia may prepare an addendum to the approved project if some changes or additions to the project are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of an SEIR are triggered. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 states that a subsequent EIR shall be prepared if one or more of the following conditions occurs: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR. If the project does not trigger the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, an Addendum to the approved project is the appropriate documentation for the project.
• Subsequent EIR (SEIR) Option. During the preparation of the technical studies or the environmental analysis, if it is determined that the proposed project triggers the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, an addendum would not be feasible and an SEIR would be the appropriate CEQA documentation. Additionally, based on our understanding of the proposed project, the proposed project has the potential to result in new air quality, GHG, and VMT impacts not previously identified in the 2019 GP EIR, which would trigger the preparation of an SEIR. While an SEIR follows the same public review process as a standard EIR, it allows for a more focused evaluation of environmental impacts since it would tier off the analysis for the approved project in the Certified EIR.
Our scope of work presents a cost-effective and timely approach by starting on the technical studies first; preliminary results from the technical studies will inform the appropriate CEQA path. The scope of work incorporates technical studies for air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, noise and vibration, infrastructure, transportation, and water supply. Concurrent with the technical studies, PlaceWorks will prepare the environmental setting and project description that will be incorporated into either the Addendum or SEIR.
The following scope of work outlines the two CEQA approaches. 34 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
Task 5. CEQA Scope of Work
As described above, PlaceWorks has provided two approaches to CEQA documentation for the proposed project.
Addendum Approach. Option A
For the first approach, PlaceWorks would prepare an Addendum in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA procedures. Where our scope of work or cost differs, we identify the Addendum tasks as "A". This approach will use the latest CEQA Guidelines Appendix G environmental checklist, including a comprehensive analysis of impacts as measured from the approved project for each checklist question using methodologies consistent with other recent City CEQA documents and incorporate applicable mitigation measures from the approved project where necessary to reduce significant impacts to a less than significant level.
SEIR Approach. Option B
For the second approach, PlaceWorks would prepare an SEIR in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA procedures. Where our scope of work or cost differs, we identify the SEIR tasks as "B". This approach includes the preparation of a Notice of Preparation (NOP) that includes a detailed enough project description so that the public understands the project, but no more detailed than necessary to begin the CEQA process. At this time, it is anticipated that the following CEQA topics will be closed out from further review (i.e., not carried through to an SEIR):
• Agricultural and Forestry Resources
• Biological Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Geology and Soils
• Mineral Resources
• Wildfire
Similar to the Addendum approach, the SEIR will use the latest CEQA Guidelines Appendix G environmental checklist; include a comprehensive analysis of impacts as measured from approved project for each checklist question using methodologies consistent with other recent City CEQA documents; incorporate applicable mitigation measures from the approved project and/or identify new mitigation measures where necessary to reduce significant impacts to a less than significant level.
The following scope includes completion of each step of CEQA processing for both approaches, including document preparation and technical studies, to ensure compliance with CEQA and legal defensibility.
Task 5.1 Project Initiation (Options A & B)
5.1.1 PROJECT INITIATION/KICK-OFF MEETING
PlaceWorks' CEQA Principal and CEQA Project Manager will participate in one project initiation/kick-off meeting with the City to discuss the proposed project and the paths associated with both CEQA approaches (Addendum or SEIR). PlaceWorks will then develop a detailed CEQA schedule that reflects the selected approach and a detailed data needs list.
Deliverable(s):
» Project Schedule and Data Needs
» Kick-off Meeting Attendance and Materials
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 35
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
5.1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PlaceWorks will prepare the project description for the environmental analyses. CEQA Guidelines Section 15124 indicates that the project description should contain precise boundaries and location, a clearly written statement of objectives (SEIR approach only), a general description of the project characteristics and supporting public service facilities, and a statement briefly describing the intended uses of the EIR (SEIR approach only). It requires that the project description not supply extensive detail beyond that needed for evaluation and review of the environmental impacts. A logical, concise, and organized project description sets the tone and structure of the entire CEQA analysis and is essential for developing a defensible environmental document. To achieve these fundamental requirements, PlaceWorks will develop a project description detailing each component of the project, providing clarity on the different phases of the CEQA analysis. A clear description of construction activities, phasing, and assumptions will be outlined so that they tie directly into the technical quantitative analyses. The completed project description will be submitted to the City for review and comment. This scope of work assumes one round of review and comment.
Deliverable(s):
» Project Description (electronic)
Task 5.2 Administrative Draft CEQA Document
Under both the Addendum (Option A) and SEIR (Option B) approaches, PlaceWorks will incorporate the technical analyses developed in Task 4, Technical Analyses, into the CEQA document.
OPTION 5.2.A ADDENDUM
PlaceWorks will coordinate with the City on the appropriate format for an Addendum and provide an administrative draft for review. The administrative draft Addendum will:
• Focus on the proposed changes compared to the approved project. • Determine if there are any effects peculiar to the project that were not originally evaluated. • Include the determination that the findings of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that would require an SEIR cannot be made.
• Include all the technical analyses from Task 4.
The Addendum will include a discussion that compares the proposed project to the approved project. We will include findings of the environmental effects of the project compared to the approved project. We will rely on and make use of the analysis and mitigation measures in the 2019 GP EIR. Please note that, unlike other CEQA documents (e.g., EIR, MND), an Addendum does not require a public review period. Also, an Addendum does not require AB 52 tribal consultation.
The completed Administrative Draft Addendum will be submitted to the City for review and comment in Microsoft (MS) Word. For the purposes of this proposal, we assume that one round of review with the City of the Administrative Draft Addendum and associated appendices will be necessary and that all comments will be made in the Word document using tracked changes. Modification to the scope of work, budget, and timeline may be necessary if additional reviews are required.
Deliverable(s):
» Administrative Draft Addendum and Appendices (electronic copy only) 36 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
�J
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
OPTION 5.2.B SEIR
5.2.1.B Notice of Preparation
If it is determined that proceeding with an Addendum is not possible, PlaceWorks will proceed with an SEIR.
The first step in the SEIR process is to prepare and distribute a notice of preparation (NOP). PlaceWorks will prepare the draft NOP and submit it to the City for review and approval. The NOP will clearly identify the public review period, contact person, and address established for submitting responses. After approval, PlaceWorks will distribute copies of the NOP to the State Clearinghouse (uploading documents on behalf of the City to CEQANet), County Clerk, and State and local agencies. It is assumed that the City will conduct any local or radius distribution. This task assumes one round of review and comments with the City and up to 50 certified mailings.
5.2.2.B Scoping Meeting
The proposed project meets the definition of a project of "statewide, regional, or areawide significance" as defined in CEQA Guidelines section 15206, since the proposed project includes a specific plan amendment. A scoping meeting is required for projects of "statewide, regional, or areawide significance." PlaceWorks will assist the City in organizing and conducting one public scoping meeting to present the proposed project and preliminary environmental topics that will be included in the SEIR, and to solicit comments regarding the scope and content of the environmental issues to be addressed in the SEIR.
PlaceWorks will develop scoping meeting materials for use in the public meeting. For the purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that the scoping meeting will be in person. If various media are necessary that require additional coordination and materials (e.g., facilitation of both in -person and virtual), additional scope and fee will be necessary. PlaceWorks will develop a draft PowerPoint presentation for one round of review and revision.
5.2.3.B Draft SEIR
PlaceWorks will develop a comprehensive and defensible Draft SEIR for City review. All technical analyses developed in Task 4 will be integrated into the appropriate SEIR sections, in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. Each topical section of the document will: (a) summarize the approved project; (b) describe existing environmental conditions and pertinent regulatory policies and programs that apply to this project; (c) define the criteria by which impacts will be determined to be significant; (d) determine the environmental changes from the approved project that would result from the project; (e) evaluate the significance of those changes with respect to the impact significance criteria (thresholds) and the evaluation in the approved project; (f) define modifications or new mitigation measures to reduce or avoid all potentially significant adverse impacts; and (g) provide a conclusion as to whether significant impacts would remain even after successful implementation of recommended mitigation measures. This task assumes one round of review by the City. Comments are assumed to be relatively light and not result in the need for additional restructuring or detailed analysis. Should additional rounds of review or restructuring of the document or methodology be necessary, additional budget may be requested.
Deliverable(s):
» File NOP with County Clerk and State Clearinghouse
» NOP and distribution by certified mail (up 50 hard copies, up to 50 flash drives, and 50 certified mailings) » Draft and final NOP (digital)
» Scoping meeting attendance and materials
» Administrative Draft SEIR (Word and PDF format)
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 37
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
Task 5.3 Screencheck Draft of CEQA Document (Options A & B) Following the administrative draft review of either an Addendum (Option A) or SEIR (Option B), PlaceWorks will submit a screencheck draft to the City for review. PlaceWorks will coordinate with the City to incorporate and address any comments.
The completed screencheck draft document will be submitted to the City for review and comment.
PlaceWorks' CEQA Principal/Project Manager will meet with the City staff to discuss and resolve any major areas of concern in the screencheck draft. Follow-up will be conducted as necessary to respond to comments.
For the purposes of this proposal, we incorporated one round of review of the screencheck draft with the City. Modification to the scope of work, budget, and time frame may be necessary if additional screencheck reviews are required.
Deliverable(s):
» Electronic version of the Screencheck Draft CEQA Document (Word and PDF format) Task 5.4 Public Draft CEQA Document
OPTION 5.4.A ADDENDUM
Following the receipt of comments on the screencheck draft Addendum, PlaceWorks will prepare the print - check version of the Addendum for the City's final review. This is the last version before the document is ready for decision makers. Upon approval of the print -check draft, PlaceWorks would provide the final Addendum document for Planning Commission and City Council's consideration and determination. It is assumed comments on the print -check will be editorial and minor.
Deliverable(s):
» Printcheck draft and Public Draft Addendum and Appendices (electronic copy Word and PDF) OPTION 5.4.B SEIR
Upon final approval by City staff of the Draft SEIR, PlaceWorks will prepare the Draft SEIR for public review.
This will include final formatting, editing, and printing. PlaceWorks will prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC) and Notice of Availability (NOA) for City approval and signature. PlaceWorks will distribute the NOC and NOA to the State Clearinghouse, County Clerk, and other responsible agencies. It is assumed that the City will handle any online posting and additional distribution of the NOA/NOC. This scope of work does not include development or placement of notices in newspapers.
Deliverable(s):
» File NOA and NOC
» Public Review Draft SEIR and appendices (digital)
» NOA and distribution by certified mail (up 50 hard copies, up to 50 flash drives, and 50 certified mailings) Task 5.5 Final CEQA Document
OPTION 5.5.A ADDENDUM
This task is not applicable to an addendum approach.
OPTION 5.5.B SEIR
Following the NOA and Draft SEIR public review period, and receipt of public comments, PlaceWorks will prepare the Final SEIR.
38 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
While it is difficult to predict the exact volume of comments that will be received on the Draft SEIR, given the size and location of the project and the issues at hand, our assumption is that there will be a moderate level of response and complexity to the comments received. We will take a systematic approach to developing a Final SEIR that involves these key steps: (1) efficiently catalogue, organize, and disseminate comments/assignments to the team; (2) flag any comments that require additional technical analysis or could potentially trigger Section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines regarding recirculation; (3) isolate comments that can be addressed through master responses; and (4) develop a schedule and budget that reflects the level of effort needed. The proposed budget assumes no detailed attorney comment letters or revision to methodology or modeling will be required. The budget and scope will be reassessed upon review of comments received.
Written responses will be prepared for each comment. The draft Final SEIR will contain an introduction describing the public review process for the Draft SEIR, copies of all comment letters, and written responses to all comments. As described previously, master responses will be developed if appropriate based on team discussions. Responses will focus on comments that address the adequacy of the Draft SEIR. Comments that do not address SEIR adequacy will be noted as such, and no further response will be provided unless deemed necessary by the City.
Responses will be prepared by PlaceWorks with input from our in-house technical specialists and subconsultants, as needed. Should comments result in need for revisions to Draft SEIR text, this will be accomplished in strikeout/underline and provided in a dedicated chapter in the Final SEIR. The draft Final SEIR will be provided electronically to the City for review. This task assumes up to 10 comment letters on the Draft SEIR and two rounds of City review and comment on the Draft SEIR. Modification to the scope of work, budget, and time frame may be necessary if additional reviews are required. Additionally, if more comment letters are received than anticipated or extensive comments letters are received, additional scope of work and budget may be necessary. Upon sign -off by the City, the Final SEIR will be completed at least 10 days prior to potential approval by the City.
Deliverable(s):
» Administrative Draft Final SEIR (electronic)
» Printcheck Draft Final SEIR (electronic)
» Public Review Draft Final SEIR (electronic)
Task 5.6 Approval Documents
OPTION 5.6.A ADDENDUM
5.6.1.A&B Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) PlaceWorks will prepare an MMRP based on mitigation measures in the 2019 MMRP and pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. It will be in standard City format and will identify the significant impacts that would result from the project; applicable mitigation measures for each impact; the timing at which the measures will need to be conducted; the entity responsible for implementing the mitigation measure; and the City department or other agency responsible for monitoring the mitigation effort and ensuring its success. The completed MMRP will be submitted to City staff for review and comment. For purposes of this proposal, we incorporated one round of review.
5.6.2.A&B Notice of Determination (NOD)
Within five days of the final approval of the Addendum, PlaceWorks will prepare the required NOD and file it with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse. The NOD and County filing fees will be mailed with pre - stamped return envelope so we receive a filing record. We will request from the City of Placentia a receipt Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 39
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
of previous payment of California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) filing fees. If this receipt is not available, a second payment may be required (not included in this scope). The current filing costs include $50 (county filing fee) and $4,051.25 (CDFW filing fee).
Deliverable(s):
» MMRP (MS Word and PDF)
» NOD (PDF) Filed with State Clearinghouse and County Clerk OPTION 5.6.B SEIR
If an SEIR is required, PlaceWorks would prepare a MMRP and NOD as detailed in section 5.6 above for the SEIR.
5.6.3.B Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations In addition, PlaceWorks will prepare the findings of fact and, if necessary, a statement of overriding considerations. This will be based on the Final SEIR's mitigation measures and conclusions. If economic or other information is necessary to support rejection of project alternatives in the Final EIR, it is assumed that this information would be provided by the City. One round of Applicant comments and one round of City comments are assumed.
Deliverable(s):
» MMRP (MS Word and PDF)
» Findings/Statement of Overriding Considerations (MS Word and PDF) (Option 5.6.B only) » NOD (PDF) Filed with State Clearinghouse and County Clerk Task 5.7 Project Meetings, Management, and Coordination (Options A & B) During the course of the project, under both the Addendum (Option A) and SEIR (Option B) approaches, PlaceWorks staff time will be required to manage the PlaceWorks and subconsultant project team; manage the Addendum or SEIR preparation effort; and maintain constant, close communication with the City. This task is intended to ensure that the proposed project will be completed on time and within budget and that all work products are of the highest quality. PlaceWorks will coordinate the team's work for the communication of issues, transmittal of comments, financial management, and other project management matters. Invoices will be provided on a monthly basis for the duration of the proposed project. Project management time is based on one hour per month of the CEQA Principal's time and four hours per month of the CEQA Project Manager's time for the duration of the estimated schedule for each CEQA approach. It assumes up to 6 months for an Addendum (Option A) and 12 months for the SEIR (Option B). If the schedule of the project is extended for reasons beyond PlaceWorks' control, a contract amendment may be required for additional fees for project management and coordination efforts.
This task also assumes a total of 6 virtual meetings for the Addendum approach and 12 virtual meetings for the SEIR approach over the course of the CEQA process with attendance by the CEQA Project Manager, CEQA Principal, and one staff member (if needed).
Deliverable(s):
» Virtual meeting attendance
» Ongoing project management and administration
40 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
Task 5.8 Hearing Attendance (Options A & B)
PlaceWorks' CEQA Project Manager will attend up to two public hearings at the City. We assume approximately eight hours for each public hearing — the hours noted include preparation, drive, and attendance time.
Deliverable(s):
» Attendance at up to two public hearings
Task 6. Technical Analyses
It is our understanding that the following technical reports will be prepared, reviewed, and/or approved by the City. PlaceWorks will review these reports and incorporate them into the environmental analysis. • Full record of previously certified/adopted CEQA documents, including Draft and Final EIRs, findings, and resolution
• Geotechnical Report (if available)
• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (if available)
• Hydrology/Drainage Report (if available)
For purposes of this proposal, the City -prepared technical documents are assumed to be complete and contain the information necessary to adequately evaluate the environmental impacts of the project for either an Addendum or the SEIR approach. We will review the studies for CEQA adequacy and incorporate them into the Addendum or appropriate topical sections of the SEIR.
PlaceWorks and its subconsultants will prepare the following technical analyses to support the proposed project and preparation of the Addendum or SEIR.
Task 6.1 Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Analysis (PlaceWorks) PlaceWorks will prepare an air quality, energy, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions technical analysis to evaluate potential criteria air pollutant, toxic air contaminant (TAC), energy and GHG emissions impacts associated with the proposed project compared to that identified in the 2019 Certified General Plan EIR (2019 GP EIR). Impacts will be programmatic, based on the level of detail identified in the Specific Plan and modeled based on the current methodology of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) for projects in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). Modeling of operational -phase criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions will be conducted using the latest version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod).
The results of the analysis will be summarized in the environmental document, and modeling will be included as an appendix. If necessary, mitigation measures from 2019 GP EIR will be incorporated and/or modified, as needed, to reduce any potentially significant regional and/or localized air quality impacts.
Construction Phase Impacts. Potential construction emissions associated with the proposed project will be evaluated because no site -specific construction information is anticipated to be available at this time. Under Option A, mitigation measure AQ-1 of the 2019 GP EIR would be modified to identify clear performance standards for future development project in the Specific Plan area to mitigate potential regional and localized construction emissions impacts of the proposed project. Under Option B, mitigation measure AQ-1 would be deleted and new mitigation measures would be identified to mitigate potential regional and localized construction emissions impacts of the proposed project.
Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions. The proposed project could generate an increase in criteria air pollutant and/or GHG emissions from transportation sources (passenger vehicles), energy (natural gas and Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 41
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
indirect emissions from purchased electricity), area sources (landscape emissions, consumer products), indirect emissions from water use and wastewater generation, and indirect emissions from waste disposal. It is not anticipated that the land uses within the Specific Plan would include industrial or business park uses that would be likely to generate a substantial number of truck trips or stationary source emissions. PlaceWorks will estimate the increase in emissions associated with the proposed project compared to the approved project.
Modeling will be based on the existing and project weekday and weekend daily trips and weekday vehicle miles traveled provided by Fehr and Peers for the full buildout scenario. PlaceWorks will provide an estimate of the increase in long-term emissions from operation of the project compared to South Coast AQMD's significance thresholds.
Health Impacts of Criteria Air Pollutants. In 2018, the California Supreme Court determined that the EIR for the Friant Ranch project was inadequate because it did not make a reasonable effort to substantively connect the project's air quality impacts to likely health consequences or explain in meaningful detail why such analysis is not feasible. Although the air quality analysis for the previous project did not identify significant unavoidable long-term air quality impacts, the proposed project could exceed the South Coast AQMD regional significance thresholds. At a minimum, PlaceWorks will include a qualitative discussion correlating the proposed project's criteria air pollutant emissions to potential health effects. Many EIRs still provide a qualitative discussion to address the Friant Ranch Ruling because such modeling requires regional -scale photochemical grid modeling tools, and the results of the health incident analysis are not necessarily meaningful to the decision -makers or public.
AQMP Consistency and Other Air Quality Impacts. The SoCAB is currently designated nonattainment under the National and/or California ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for ozone (O3), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM25), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), and lead (Los Angeles County only). The Certified South Coast AQMD has adopted air quality management plans (AQMPs) to ensure the SoCAB can attain the long-term National and California AAQS. The analysis will include a consistency evaluation of the project's regional emissions to South Coast AQMD's AQMP. Furthermore, the SoCAB has been designated in attainment for carbon monoxide (CO) under both the California and National AAQS; therefore, the air quality analysis will include only a qualitative assessment of CO hotspots. PlaceWorks will also describe potential odor impacts qualitatively compared to that identified in the Certified EIR.
Energy. PlaceWorks will quantify the net increase in project -related energy use associated the long-term on - road fuel usage based on VMT provided by Fehr & Peers. Fuel use for on -road vehicles will be modeled using the most current model. Electricity and natural gas use associated with operation of the proposed project will be based directly on the CaIEEMod outputs. PlaceWorks will also provide an overview and review of the project's consistency with the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program.
GHG Emissions. The GHG analysis will discuss state, regional, and local GHG reduction goals, including Senate Bill 32 (SB 32), Assembly Bill 1279 (AB 1279), and SB 375. To achieve the GHG reduction targets of SB 32 and AB 1279 the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted the 2022 Scoping Plan. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has adopted the Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (Connect SoCal 2024) to ensure that the southern California region can attain the regional transportation -related GHG reduction goals of SB 375. Consistency of the proposed project with these statewide and regional GHG emissions reduction strategies will be analyzed.
Deliverable(s):
» Air Quality, energy, and GHG analyses will be summarized in the environmental document; modeling included as an appendix
42 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
Task 6.2 Noise and Vibration Analysis (PlaceWorks)
PlaceWorks will prepare the noise and vibration technical analyses in relation to the analysis for the proposed project compared to that identified in the 2019 GP EIR. The technical noise impact analysis will discuss relevant standards and criteria for noise exposure, including those in the City of Placentia General Plan Noise Element and Municipal Code noise ordinance. The results of this analysis will be summarized in a technical report that can be summarized in the environmental document prepared for the proposed project, and modeling will be provided in an appendix.
Existing Conditions Noise Survey (SEIR Option Only). PlaceWorks will conduct short-term noise monitoring survey to assess existing conditions and identify the nearest sensitive receptors and other environmental characteristics. PlaceWorks' noise specialist will conduct up to four short-term (15 minute) noise measurements at representative off -site noise -sensitive locations.
Transportation Noise. Traffic noise will be analyzed quantitatively based on information provided by Fehr & Peers (F&P). The FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction guidelines will be used to determine if project -related traffic increase would result in significant increases over the baseline conditions.
Stationary Noise. Noise impacts from nontransportation sources will be evaluated, based on local noise standards. PlaceWorks will analyze noise impacts from non -transportation sources within the specific plan in terms of potential impacts to nearby noise -sensitive receptors and the noise limitations identified in the City's Municipal Code.
Construction Noise and Vibration. PlaceWorks will provide a quantitative analysis for potential construction impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project. Noise and vibration effects from construction activities will be estimated based on available construction information provided by the City, and the results will be discussed in terms of accepted local standards and the Federal Transit Administration guidance manual. Feasible mitigation measures will be identified to minimize noise and vibration impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project
Deliverable(s):
» The noise and vibration analysis will be summarized in the environmental document with technical modeling included as an appendix
Task 6.3 Tribal Consultation Support (PlaceWorks)
An Addendum does not require Assembly Bill (AB) 52 tribal consultation. However, the proposed project would require tribal consultation pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 18, which requires tribal consultation if general plan or specific plan is prepared or amended. An SEIR would require tribal consultation under AB 52 and SB 18.
SENATE BILL 18 TRIBAL CONSULTATION
The proposed project requires City review and amendments to SP -5. Under this task, PlaceWorks will coordinate with City staff to prepare SB 18 notices. Upon receipt of the tribe list provided by NAHC, PlaceWorks will prepare a template letter on behalf of the City to the tribe(s) on NAHC's list, requesting that the tribe(s) contact the City in writing (within the time frames established by SB 18) if they wish to consult on the project. The City will be responsible for mailing out the final letters to each tribe on City letterhead and any follow-up coordination and meetings with the tribe(s). It should be noted that typical tribal consultation under SB 18 can be a lengthier process than the AB 52 consultation process, extending a city's discretionary review process for a development project. A city cannot bring a project before its approval body for consideration and approval until the SB 18 process has been completed.
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 43
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
ASSEMBLY BILL 52 TRIBAL CONSULTATION
Consultation with California Native American tribes under AB 52 is the responsibility of the CEQA lead agency —in this case, the City of Placentia. However, PlaceWorks will assist the City with the consultation process. AB 52 states that tribes interested in consulting must submit or have submitted a general request letter to the lead agency to consult under AB 52 on projects requiring the preparation of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or an environmental impact report. PlaceWorks will coordinate with the City to determine which tribes have submitted these general requests. AB 52 requires that each of these groups must be contacted by letter to provide them with information about the project and asked if they wish to consult with the agency for the project being proposed.
PlaceWorks will draft the template consultation letters on behalf of the City and submit them to City staff for review and use. It is assumed that City staff will print the final letters on City letterhead and mail them to the tribes. In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1(b)(1), consultation is triggered by a tribe notifying the City in writing of its desire to consult. Consultation (if requested by a tribe) must be initiated within 30 days of the City receiving the written request to consult.
PlaceWorks assumes that the City will consult with the tribes and share the information with PlaceWorks to incorporate the relevant CEQA analysis. PlaceWorks will review any comments and mitigation measures that the tribe(s) provide to City staff during the consultation process to ensure that they are consistent with the provisions of AB 52 and CEQA.
For scheduling purposes, the AB 52 consultation process must be completed, and the findings and conclusions of the process must be carried through to the Tribal Cultural Resources topical section of the SEIR. The draft SEIR cannot be released for public review until the consultation process has been completed.
Deliverable(s):
» Draft Tribal Consultation Letters
Task 6.4 Water Supply Assessment (PlaceWorks) (OPTIONAL) Since the final buildout for the proposed project is not known at this time, this task is included as an optional task in case the proposed project meets the requirements of California Senate Bill 610 (SB 610). SB 610 requires the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment (WSA), as part of the environmental review conducted for a qualifying project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for projects that would demand an amount of water equivalent to the amount required by a 500 -dwelling -unit project.
If a WSA is required, PlaceWorks will prepare the document in compliance with SB 610. The WSA would include an assessment of whether available water supplies are sufficient to serve the demand generated by the project, as well as the reasonably foreseeable cumulative demand in the region over the next 20 years under average normal year, single dry year, and multiple dry year conditions. The WSA will rely on information provided in the Golden State Water Company's Placentia-Yorba Linda Service Area 2020 Urban Water Management Plan and water demand factors based on land use. The WSA will include the following information:
• Sources of water supply
• Quantification of past, current, and projected future water demands • Quantification of past, current, and projected water supply • Evaluation of drought impacts and consideration of variability in demand and supply based upon hydrologic conditions
44 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
• Assessment of water supply sufficiency for the project, based upon this analysis.
If there are insufficient supplies to meet demand over the next 20 years, additional sources of supply would need to be identified. If this is the case, the WSA will make recommendations for where these new supply sources will come from. The WSA can also recommend project modifications that could reduce the demand (water usage) at the proposed project.
Deliverable(s):
» WSA (digital copies: MS Word and PDF)
Task 6.5 Transportation Impact Study (Fehr and Peers)
As a subconsultant to PlaceWorks, Fehr and Peers Inc (F&P) will prepare a Transportation Impact Study and provide transportation data needed for air quality, GHG, energy, and noise analyses. Any additional technical analysis, meetings, documentation or response to comments requested outside of the scope identified below.
TASK 6.5.1 MOBILITY ANALYSIS & TRANSPORTATION METRICS FOR CEQA ANALYSIS CEQA Transportation Metrics
The following transportation metrics have been requested to support the CEQA analysis. • Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Metrics:
» Weekday and Weekend Daily Vehicle Trips and Trip Generation for the following Scenarios:
— Existing
— Current Specific Plan
— Proposed Specific Plan (Project)
Note: not just the net increase
• Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) using the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM) and applying the origin -destination method for the following Scenarios:
»
»
»
»
»
Existing
Proposed Specific Plan (Project)
Current Specific Plan
Population and employment in the model to validate the data Trips or VMT by fleet mix (e.g., % passenger vehicles, % medium -duty trucks, % heavy duty trucks) by referencing the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Model, the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Caltrans Annual Average Daily Trips (AADT) data, or other data sources as available Reductions in Trips or VMT from Specific Plan Policies that support transit, bicycles, walking or Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
• Noise Metrics
» ADT segment volumes (two-way) for the following segments (in Excel, with and without the Project, for Existing and Specific Plan Horizon Year):
— Crowther Avenue
— Placentia Avenue
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 45
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
TASK 6.5.2 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED SCREENING ASSESSMENT FOR CEQA F&P will review the project description and conduct a VMT screening assessment based on the City of Placentia Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment (June 2020). Based F&P's initial review of the project, there is potential that the project will screen from VMT assessment based on its proximity to the future Metrolink Station (transit priority area screening).
F&P will confirm this assumption and that the project meets all the appropriate criteria in a VMT screening assessment.
Consistent with City requirements, F&P will also review the proposed project's potential impact on pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities in the study area.
F&P will summarize the results of their assessment in a draft technical memorandum. F&P will work with the City and respond to comments on the draft report and resubmit as final.
TASK 6.5.3 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR CEQA (OPTIONAL) If the project is not eligible for VMT screening, F&P will prepare a full transportation impact analysis by forecasting project VMT estimates and comparing those against the City's established thresholds of significance. F&P will utilize a detailed version of the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM) to prepare VMT forecasts.
VMT Forecasting
The following OCTAM forecasting scenarios will be prepared as part of this effort:
• Baseline (2024) No Project
• Baseline (2024) With Project
• Cumulative (2045) No Project
• Cumulative (2045) With Project
Project Level Assessment
For the project level assessment, F&P will code base year OCTAM to represent the Project, isolating the proposed Project in its respective TAZ in base and future models. VMT data will be extracted from the model run and interpolated to represent the project baseline year. VMT per capita will be reported and compared against the City's threshold of significance.
Cumulative Level Assessment
F&P will also review the OCTAM and 2024 SCAG RTP/SCS land use assumptions to confirm consistency with the general plan and RTP land use. If the project is not assumed in the general plan and RTP buildout year land use, a cumulative model run will be required.
Mitigation Measures
If the proposed project is found to have a significant VMT impact, potential mitigation options will be recommended and discussed with the project team for their inclusion as mitigation. The mitigation strategies will be based on transportation demand management (TDM) measures that have been found to be effective in reducing VMT for the housing uses being developed as part of the project and in the context of Placentia consistent with the requirements in the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing health and Equity (2021).
46 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
�J
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
Documentation and Meetings
The results of the above assessment will be summarized in a draft technical memorandum. The memorandum will be submitted to the City of Placentia for review. F&P will respond to one round of consolidated comments and submit a final version of the memorandum to the City.
This scope of services includes up to two conference calls with the City but does not include any in -person meetings. In -person meeting or public hearing attendance can be scoped on a time and materials basis as requested by the client.
TASK 6.5.4 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) TRAFFIC STUDY (OPTIONAL) Though not required by CEQA, intersection capacity analysis is utilized in Placentia to size transportation infrastructure. If authorized, F&P will conduct a traffic study to assess the project's effect on local transportation infrastructure and identify potential future improvements needed to meet the City's LOS standard. Although the study area will be finalized after the Traffic Study Scoping task below, F&P's scope of work below assumes a traffic study that will evaluate up to five key intersections based on preliminary peak hour trip estimates, which may include the following:
• Crowther Avenue & Placentia Avenue
• Kimberly Avenue & Placentia Avenue
• Orangethorpe Avenue & Placentia Avenue
• Orangethorpe Avenue & SR -57 Southbound Ramps/Iowa Place • Orangethorpe Avenue & SR -57 Northbound Ramps
Traffic Study Scoping
F&P will utilize trip generation estimates developed in Task 6.4.1, above, to identify the appropriate study area. Typically, the City of Placentia, City of Fullerton, and Caltrans request that any intersection to which a project would add 50 or more peak hour trips should be included in a traffic study. F&P will identify applicable intersections in a scoping memorandum that also summarizes the project information, trip generation estimates, trip distribution, and analysis and forecasting methodology. F&P will respond to one round of comments from the City and return the scoping form as final.
If additional intersections are added to the study scope, F&P will adjust the scope and fee of this task accordingly.
Data Collection and Existing Conditions
F&P will collect new AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts at the study intersections. Counts will be collected when schools are in session. We will obtain existing signal timing information for all traffic signals from the City of Placentia, City of Fullerton, and Caltrans.
The traffic counts, signal timings, and intersection geometrics will be incorporated into Vistro to identify how the existing intersections operate and estimate LOS.
Forecasting
F&P will complete the following forecasts for this effort:
• Opening Year Forecasts. Represent anticipated opening year for the project, existing counts will be grown by adding traffic from approved development plus an overall growth rate determined by reviewing growth anticipate by OCTAM in this area.
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 47
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
• Project Forecasts. The trip generation estimates prepared in Task 6.4.1 will be used to estimate the number of trips generated by the project. Those trips will be assigned to the street network using a trip distribution based on existing travel patterns in the area and general locations of other land uses in the area. • Future Year Forecasts. OCTAM will be utilized to estimate future traffic growth between baseline 2024 and future year 2045 to be applied to existing counts.
The Project forecasts will be added to the No Project forecasts to represent "With Project" conditions.
Operations Assessment and Deficiency Identification
LOS at the study intersections will be evaluated for the Opening Year conditions with and without the Project.
The results will be reviewed and, if deficiencies are identified, improvements to provide acceptable operations will be identified.
Off -ramp queues will be reported at Caltrans study intersections, and F&P will evaluate if queueing will affect freeway main -line operations.
Documentation
F&P will summarize the results of its assessment in a draft transportation study report. F&P will work with the City on their review, respond to one set of consolidated comments on the draft report, and resubmit as final.
The document will also address key aspects of the project, like site access, on -site circulation, active transportation and public transit analysis, and freeway ramp queuing at Caltrans intersections. For any unsignalized intersections, peak hour signal warrants will be reviewed.
Deliverable(s):
» Mobility Analysis and Transportation Metrics for CEQA Analysis (digital copies) » VMT Screening Assessment for CEQA (digital copies)
» Two conference calls
» Optional: Draft Transportation Impact Analysis (digital copies in MS Word and PDF) » Optional: Final Transportation Impact Analysis (digital copies in MS Word and PDF) » Optional: Draft LOS Traffic Study (digital copies in MS Word and PDF) » Optional: Final LOS Traffic Study (digital copies in MS Word and PDF) Task 6.6 Infrastructure Report (Fuscoe)
As a subconsultant to PlaceWorks, Fuscoe will assist PlaceWorks with updating a corridor and specific plan for the SP -5 area.
Project Description. Assist PlaceWorks with developing a corridor and specific plan for the SP -5 area (19 acres) located in the City of Placentia. The SP -5 encompasses 11 parcels and is generally located north of Orangethorpe Ave, east of Placentia Ave, south of Crowther Ave, and west of SR -57 in the southwestern portion of Placentia.
Purposes of Services. Provide infrastructure analysis to evaluate the proposed land uses and the update of an existing corridor and Specific Plan and associated CEQA documentation. 48 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
TASK 6.6.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
In coordination with PlaceWorks and City staff, request and review existing condition infrastructure data from the City, County of Orange, and OCSD and compile into comprehensive GIS database for future analysis and exhibits. Data request and review includes storm drain network (City and County) and master plan of drainage; sewer system data including sewer master plans, SSMP, and regional studies; water system data including water master plan and pressure zones.
Evaluate the infrastructure systems that support the current SP -5 corridor planning area including drainage, water, and sewer systems. Establish water and sewer demands using City -approved water and sewer generation factors to generate an existing conditions baseline. Coordinate with Golden State Water Company on the status of the existing water supply and distribution system and Placentia Public Works on the existing sewer network. Conduct outreach with Public Works staff to identify any known issues related to capacity, maintenance, or other items such as localized flooding, etc. for the systems serving the SP -5 area. Summarize the findings into a brief memorandum including narratives, tables and exhibits and emphasize any existing condition deficiencies which helps inform future land use decision. This task assumes the City will provide utility data in GIS format.
TASK 6.6.2 PROPOSED CONDITION INFRASTRUCTURE EVALUATION Review the preliminary concepts/alternatives and provide technical feedback on the proposed alternatives from an infrastructure perspective. Based on the selection of the preferred alternative, calculate the maximum buildout potential for the preferred alternative using water and sewer demand estimates consistent with the demands used in the existing condition. Compare maximum buildout conditions against the existing condition and current SP maximum buildout scenarios. Work with the Public Works department to identify sewer impacts and Golden State Water Company to identify any potential water system impacts related to increases in water and sewer demand.
This analysis does not include any hydraulic modeling of the City's water or sewer systems. If required, Fuscoe will provide input data to the City's modeling consultant.
TASK 6.6.3 CEQA TECHNICAL STUDY
Prepare an infrastructure technical report covering CEQA thresholds analyses for drainage, water, sewer, and water quality. The report will serve as a technical appendix for the EIR / MND and will be used for development of the utilities section within the EIR/MND.
TASK 6.6.4 MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
Participate in meetings with City staff, PlaceWorks, and outside agencies to support the development of the Specific Plan and CEQA documentation.
Deliverable(s):
» Existing Condition Memorandum with exhibits
» Technical Report for CEQA compliance document
» Meetings
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 49
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
Schedule
Provided on the following pages are two project schedules. One for each of the two CEQA options. 50 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
The PlaceWorks Team
SP -5 Corridor Plan & Specific Plan Update with CEQA Compliance
SCHEDULE - EIR ADDENDUM OPTION A
Month:
Week:
2024
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
2025
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
2026
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
1 2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 TASK
1. Kick -Off and Project Management
1.1 Kick-off Meeting/ Background Review & Goals
■
1.2 Existing Conditions Analysis (Story Map)
1.3 Project Meetings and Communication
Ongoing
TASK
2. Community Engagement
2.1 Community -wide Workshop(s) - 2
2.2 Webpage and Other On-line Content
Ongoing
TASK
3. Identify & Prioritize Options/ Develop the Plan
3.1 Site Testing
3.2 Finalize Boundary
3.3 Land Use Plan and Buildout Summary
3.4 Land Use Designations and Permitted Uses
3.5 Update and Draft Development and Design Standards
3.6 Administrative Review Draft Plan
3.7 Hearing Draft/Final Plan
TASK
4. Study Session and Public Hearing
4.1 City Council Study Session
4.2 City Council Adoption Hearing
Task
5. Environmental Review
5.1 Project Initiation
5.1.1 Project Kick -Off Meeting
■
5.1.2 Project Description
5.2 Administrative Draft CEQA Document
5.3 Screencheck Draft of CEQA Document
5.4 Public Review Draft of CEQA Document
5.5 Final CEQA Document (not applicable to addendum approach)
5.6 Certification Documents
5.6.1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
5.6.2 Notice of Determination
■
5.7 Project Meetings, Management and Coordination
Ongoing
►
5.8 Hearings (CC 1st & 3rd Tues/month, PC 2nd Tues/mo)
Task
6. Technical Analysis
6.1 Technical Report and Analysis Preparation
■
Opticnal
Task: Market Analysis
Market Analysis
=Work Period
=Review Period
CC = City Council, PC = Planning Commission
■ Staff Meeting ■ CC Meeting
■ PC Meeting ■ Community Meeting ■ Draft
■ Final
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 51
WorkPlan/Technical Approach
The PlaceWorks Team
SP -5 Corridor Plan & Specific Plan Update with CEQA Compliance
SCHEDULE - SEIR OPTION B
Month:
Week:
2024
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
2025
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
2026
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
1 2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
TASK
1. Kick-off and Project Management
1.1 Kick-off Meeting/ Background Review & Goals
■
1.2 Existing Conditions Analysis (Story Map)
"
"■""-"„'.
1.3 Project Meetings and Communication
Ongoing
iiii
TASK
2. Community Engagement
2.1 Workshop(s) - 2
2.2 TASK
3.1 WebpagCommunity-wide e
t
Webpage and Other On-line Content
Ongoing
"
"-""_'■■"_
3. Identify & Prioritize Options/ Develop the Plan
Site Testing
■
•
3.2 Finalize Boundary
3.3 Land Use Plan and Buildout Summary
3.4 Land Use Designations and Permitted Uses
■■■
3.5 Update and Draft Development and Design Standards
3.6 Administrative Review Draft Plan
3.7 TASK
4.2 Hearing Draft/Final Plan
4. Study Session and Public Hearing
City Council Study ea
■
■
4.2 City Council Adoption Hearing
'
'_■"-""_'■■"_
Task
5. Environmental Review
5.1 Project
"■_"-""_'■■"_
.11 Kick -Off
5.1.1 Project Kick -Off Meeting
5.1.2 Project Description
5.2 Administrative Draft CEQA Document
5.2.1 Notice of Preparation
5.2.2 Scoping Meeting
.
5.2.3 Draft SEIR
5.3 Screencheck Draft CEQA Document
■■■■■■■■■
_
5.4 Public Review Draft (Includes distribution of notices)
5.5 Final CEQA Document
'_""
■
.
5.6 Approval Documents
5.6.1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
5.6.2 of DfFaet/S
■
din a eon
5.6.3 Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations
5.7 Project Meetings, Management, and Coordination
Ongoing
5.8 Hearings (CC 1st & 3rd Tues/month, PC 2nd Tues/mo)
Task
6. Technical Analysis
6.1 Technical Report and Analysis Preparation
■-
Optic nal nal Task: Market Analysis
Market Analysis
=Work Period
Review Period
Public Review Period
CC = City Council, PC = Planning Commission, SM = Scoping Meeting ■ Staff Meeting ■ CC Meeting
■ PC Meeting ■ Community Meeting ■SM ■ Draft ■ Final
52 CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
APPENDIX
Resumes
Relevant Project Details
PlaceWorks' Proposed Agreement Changes
KAREN GULLEY
Managing Principal, Design
Karen has a talent for strategy and innovative problem solving that has been honed by 30 years of experience. Her skill with all facets of comprehensive planning and design for private and public sector clients expands the opportunities for creative solutions. She has led six general plans, more than forty specific plans, dozens of long-range conceptual plans for transit -readiness, and vision plans to reposition large areas. Her deep understanding of the real estate and development fields inform all facets of her public -sector projects —master plans, transit plans, conceptual design studies and park plans, coding, design guidelines, and implementation programs.
Karen has extensive experience in developing community participation programs and facilitating public meetings and workshops. She is adept at establishing a rapport with her audience and communicating complex and often controversial issues clearly and accurately. She provides expertise in project visioning and implementation, project processing, negotiating conditions of approval, responding to political considerations, and handling communication between stakeholders.
Karen is responsible for leading a team of people and projects within the Community Planning & Design Team and maintaining quality control.
Karen's strengths include handling the day-to-day management of large project teams where information sharing, issue management, problem solving, and policy development require extensive coordination. She is responsive to client needs and desires on a project and is dedicated to ensuring that the project stays on track and within budget.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Urban Planning
• Southeast Area Specific Plan I Long Beach CA
• Advanced Technology Education Park (ATEP) Framework Plan I Tustin CA • Tustin Legacy Specific Plan Update I Tustin CA
• Carson Vision Plan I Carson CA
• Savi Ranch Vision Plan I Yorba Linda CA
Corridor Planning
• Downtown Bellflower TOD Specific Plan I Bellflower CA • Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan I Placentia CA
• Beach Boulevard Specific Plan I Anaheim, CA
• Harbor Boulevard Specific Plan I Santa Ana CA
• Midtown Corridor Specific Plan I Long Beach CA
• Katella and Los Alamitos Boulevard Corridor Plan I Los Alamitos CA
EDUCATION
• BA, Economics, University of
California, Santa Cruz
• Masters Program, Urban &
Regional Planning, California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona (all
but thesis)
CERTIFICATIONS
• Certificates from the International
Association for Public Participation
» Planning for Effective Public
Participation
» Strategies for Dealing with
Opposition and Outrage in Public
Participation
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
• Urban Land Institute
» National Urban Revitalization
Product Council
» Women's Leadership Initiative
for District Chapter
Team member since 1991
PLACEWORKS A-1
A-2
KAREN GULLEY
Managing Principal, Design
[email protected]
• Corridor revitalization: planning and implementation projects for the cities of Glendora, Covina, Azusa, San Dimas, Irwindale, and Chino as part of SCAG's Compass Blueprint Demonstration Program
Infill & Redevelopment
• Brea Core Visioning and Specific Plan I Brea CA
• Crafton Hills College Village Plan I Yucaipa CA
• Mixed Use Overlay Zones I Anaheim CA
• Stanton Plaza Specific Plan I Stanton CA
• Prospect Village, Downtown Tustin Redevelopment I Tustin CA Comprehensive Planning
• Anaheim General Plan Zoning for Housing Acceleration and EIR; Anaheim First Community Assessment I Anaheim CA
• WRCOG Economic Development and Sustainability Framework Plan Western Riverside County CA
• Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update and EIR I Rancho Cucamonga CA • Economic Development Strategic Plan I San Bernardino County CA • Fontana General Plan Update & Zoning Code Consistency Program I Fontana CA • Temecula Inaugural General Plan Update and EIR I Temecula CA Large -Scale Land Planning
• MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan/Specific Plan I Tustin CA
• Harmony Specific Plan I Highland CA
• DeAnza Special Study, Mission Bay I San Diego CA
• Kennecott Master Plan I Salt Lake County UT
• Centennial Specific Plan, Tejon Ranch I Los Angeles County CA Plan Implementation
• Tustin Legacy Master Developer I Tustin and Irvine CA • Villages of Columbus Planning & Entitlements, MCAS Tustin I Tustin CA • Moffett Meadows Design & Processing I Irvine CA
ARTICLES
• "Repositioning Urban Corridors to Attract New Residential and Commercial Markets," Urban Land, 2010
• "Sowing the Seeds of Regional Planning," Urban Land, 2007 • "Reshaping the American Commercial Strip," Urban Design Group Journal, Winter 2003
SPEAKING
• "Guiding Infill Development: What Planning Commissioners Need to Know" OC Association of Planning Officials Forum, 2016
• "Got a College? New Town/Gown/Industry Collaboration" 12015 APACA State Conference; 2015 WRCOG Visioning Workshop
• "Effective Elements of Corridor Planning" I APA San Diego Chapter, 2013 AWARDS
• Yucaipa Valley Wine Country Specific Plan 12024 Award of Excellence,
APACA-IE
• Fullerton College Connector Study 12015 Award of Merit, Transportation Planning, APACA OC
• WRCOG Sustainability Framework 12013 Best of the Best Award, ULI OC/IE; 2013 Compass Blueprint Commendation, SCAG
• San Bernardino TOD Overlay 12013 Hard Won Victory Award, APACA-IE
SUZANNE SCHWAB AICP
Associate Principal
Suzanne is an experienced and versatile urban planner who loves creating places for people. She has a diverse planning background — from conceptual planning to development standards and design guidelines incorporated in specific plans, general plans, comprehensive plans, and campus master plans. These projects cover a variety of planning efforts, including health districts, master planned communities, vibrant corridors, and military base reuse.
Suzanne's plans lay the foundation for future great places. She is passionate about linking health to the built environment and has led planning efforts for impactful campus developments such as the Saint John's Hospital Phase II Master Plan in Santa Monica. She also successfully entitled the Centennial at Tejon Ranch Specific Plan in Los Angeles County, a 12,300 -acre new community projected to have 19,333 homes and 10.1 million square feet of nonresidential development with net zero energy and an unprecedented green building program.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Specific Plans
• The Village at South Coast Specific Plan I Santa Ana CA • Wine Country Specific Plan I Yucaipa CA
• Southeast Area Specific Plan (SEASP) I Long Beach CA
• Aqua Bella Specific Plan I Moreno Valley CA
• Centennial Specific Plan I Los Angeles County CA
• Goodman Commerce Center Eastvale Specific Plan I Eastvale CA • Mill Creek, Update to The Preserve Specific Plan I Chino CA • Tustin Legacy Specific Plan Update I Tustin CA
Corridor Plans
• Chapman Corridor Regulatory Requirements and Design Guidelines Placentia CA
• Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan I Anaheim CA
• Midtown Specific Plan I Long Beach CA
• Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan I Santa Ana CA General Plans
• Redondo Beach General Plan Update I Redondo Beach CA
• La Habra General Plan I La Habra CA
Other
• Beach Cities Healthy Living Campus Entitlement Services I Redondo Beach CA • Objective Design Standards and Zoning Code Updates I Anaheim CA
EDUCATION
• Master of Urban and Regional
Planning, University of California,
Irvine
• BS, Marketing and International
Studies, Indiana University,
Bloomington
• AA, Interior Design, Fashion
Institute of Design and
Merchandising, Los Angeles
• Study Abroad Program,
International Education for
Students, London, England
CERTIFICATIONS
• American Institute of Certified
Planners (AICP)
• NCI Charrette System', National
Charrette Institute
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
• Urban Land Institute
Team member since 2022
(also at PlaceWorks 2012-2018)
PLACEWORKS A-3
SUZANNE SCHWAB
Associate Principal
[email protected]
• SCAG Metrolink Area Station Analysis I SCAG Region
• Cal State Dominguez Hills Visioning Plan I Dominguez Hills CA • Harris River Ranch Entitlement Services I Sanger CA
• Riverside Reconnects, Street Car Feasibility Study I Riverside CA • Site Planning for Tustin Legacy, MCAS Reuse I Tustin CA • WRCOG Sustainability Framework Plan I Riverside County CA • SCAG UPLAN Grant Application I Long Beach CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
Master Plans
• Mt. San Antonio Community College I Walnut CA
• Mission Hospital I Mission Viejo CA
• Mission Hospital I Laguna Beach CA
• Saint John's Phase II Master Plan and Development Agreement I Santa Monica CA
• St. Mary Medical Center Revised Planned Unit Development and Development Agreement I Victorville CA
• Holy Cross I Los Angeles CA
• The Mount I Seattle WA
Feasibility Studies
• Providence Health System Workforce Housing (including Zoning Code Review, Site Planning Considerations, and Demand Study) for: Apple Valley CA; Gresham, Hillsboro, and Portland OR; and Olympia WA
Other Entitlement Projects
• St. Joseph Hospital Women's Center Medical Office Building I Orange CA • Mission Medical Office Building I Rancho Mission Viejo CA • Happy Valley Site Plan and Existing Conditions Report I Happy Valley OR • St. Mary Medical Center Reuse Planning I Apple Valley CA
LEADERSHIP & COMMUNITY
• Mentor, UC Irvine's Urban Planning Program
ACTIVITIES
• Building Healthy Places Committee, OC/IE Urban Land Institute 2022 AWARDS
• Yucaipa Valley Wine Country Specific Plan 12024 Award of Excellence,
APACA-IE
• Southeast Area Specific Plan, City of Long Beach 12022 Efficient & Sustainable Land Use — Honorable Mention, SCAG; 2022 Hard -Won Victory, APA CA; 2021 Outstanding Planning Document, AEP; and 2021 Hard Won - Victory, APACA-LA
• Midtown Specific Plan, City of Long Beach 12017 Outstanding Planning Document, AEP; 2017 Sustainability Award for Integrated Planning, SCAG • WRCOG Sustainability Framework 12013 Best of the Best Award, ULI OC/IE; and 2013 Compass Blueprint, Honorable Mention, SCAG
• Young Leader of the Year, Urban Land Institute OC/IE, 2014 • Outstanding Student Achievement, UCI Planning, Policy, and Design Program, 2012
• Fellowship Recipient, California Planning Foundation, 2012 A-4
CHAD SO AICP
Associate
EDUCATION
Chad So is a valued member of PlaceWorks' community planning and design team, with a background in landscape architecture and a deep passion for urban design. He develops urban design and streetscape design concepts, first/last mile plans for transit stations, and multimodal strategic and specific plans. He uses technical analysis with computer - aided design programs and GIS in his design work and creates graphics, maps, and diagrams. These are incorporated into plans and used to present planning and urban design concepts to clients, public meetings, and community workshops.
Before joining PlaceWorks, Chad was an urban designer at Here LA. He developed concepts, illustrations, maps, and narratives for multimodal, bicycle, and pedestrian strategic and specific plans at a scale from county to corridor to site. He trained community members in first/last mile audit methodology, oversaw station area analysis, and recommended urban design improvements. In other work experience, Chad was a design architect intern for the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation's Active Transportation Division.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• Artesia Downtown Specific Plan and EIR I Artesia CA
• Butte County Upper Ridge Community Plan I Butte County CA • Chapman Corridor Revitalization Plan I Placentia CA
• Cupertino General Plan 2040 I Cupertino CA
• Daly City Commercial Mixed Use Zone Development
• Downtown Shoreline Vison Plan l Long Beach CA
• Five Wounds Station Area Plan I San Jose CA
• Fresno Housing Parkway Master Plan I Fresno CA
• Glendora Objective Design Standards l Glendora CA
• Greater Higgins Area Plan l Nevada County CA
• Hercules Waterfront Blocks ABCD Outreach I Hercules CA • Hollister General Plan Design Guidelines I Hollister CA • Livermore General Plan Update l Livermore CA
• Long Beach LGBTQ+ Cultural District I Long Beach CA
• Madera Station Relocation Transit Area I Madera CA
• Millbrae Station Area Specific Plan Update I Millbrae CA • Orange County Council of Governments Objective Design Standards l Orange County CA
• San Bernardino (City) General Plan, Specific Plans, and Downtown Urban Design l San Bernardino CA
• Stockton General Plan Update l Stockton CA
• Sunnyvale Housing Development Objective Design Standards I Sunnyvale CA • Wildomar General Plan Update l Wildomar CA
l Daly City CA
• BS, Landscape Architecture,
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
• Study Abroad, Santa Chiara Study
Center, Castiglion Fiorentino,
Tuscany, Italy
CERTIFICATIONS
• American Institute of Certified
Planners #35134
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
Team member since 2022
PLACEWORKS A_5
-40
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
CHAD SO
Associate
[email protected]
Design and Planning
• 405 Multimodal Corridor Plan I LA County CA
• Blue Line First/Last Mile Plan I Los Angeles, Long Beach, Compton CA • Brea Connecting the Core Active Transportation Plan I Brea CA • Crenshaw/LAX Northern Feasibility Study and TOC Analysis I LA County CA • Downey Pedestrian Plan I Downey CA
• Expo/Crenshaw First/Last Mile Plan I Los Angeles CA
• Glendale Pedestrian Master Plan I Glendale CA
• Golden State District Specific Plan I Burbank CA
• Inglewood First/Last Mile Plan I Inglewood CA
• LA Metro Station Evaluation Program I LA County
• NextGen Bus Study I LA County CA
• North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT Urban Design Integration Guide I Los Angeles CA
• One San Pedro Transformation Plan I San Pedro CA
• Ocean Ave Artist in Residence I Santa Monica CA
• Purple (D Line) Extension First/Last Mile Plan I Los Angeles CA • Regional Dedicated Transit Lanes Study I Southern CA
• Transit to Parks Strategic Plan I LA County CA
• Willoughby Streetscape Design Project I West Hollywood CA Creative Community Outreach
• Climate Talks Box I LA County CA
• East San Gabriel Mobility Action Plan I LA County CA
• Little Tokyo Joint Development Guidelines I Los Angeles CA • Long Beach Vision Zero I Long Beach CA
• One Arroyo Creative Outreach I Pasadena CA
• Oxnard Sustainable Transportation Plan I Oxnard CA
• Santa Barbara Active Transportation Plan I Santa Barbara County CA • Uptown Land Use & Neighborhood Strategy I Long Beach CA A-6
STEVE GUNNELLS
Chief Economist
Steve's career spans the spectrum of community planning and economic development. As PlaceWorks' in-house economist, he plays a role in a great many of the firm's active projects. He focuses on crafting plans, policies, and development projects that are grounded in regional and global economic realities. He helps his clients leverage market forces to achieve their goals. And most importantly, he uses his grasp of economics and real estate markets not only to overcome existing challenges but to help communities create visionary plans that capitalize on the possibilities, not just past trends.
Steve works with communities to bridge the gap between long-range planning policies and economic development —with community organizations and special districts to fund and implement priority projects —and with developers to guide project decision -making and obtain entitlements based on sound economic and market analysis. Steve has also served as the field director for a consulting team on a World Bank project in Yemen, an Economic Development Fellow with the International Economic Development Council, a county planning director in Virginia, and a planning and economic consultant in Michigan and Ohio.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Economic and Market Analysis
• Logistics Industry Analysis I San Bernardino County CA • TDR Bank Benefits Analysis I Santa Fe County NM
• Fiscal Impact Analysis, New Jersey Highlands Water Quality Protection and Regional Planning Act I Chester NJ
• Economic Analysis, Collier County Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District TDR Restudy I Naples FL
• Evaluation of Irvine Business Complex TDR Program I Irvine CA • Market Analysis for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan I Redding CA • Market Analysis, Southwest Fresno Specific Plan I Fresno CA • Economic, Market, and Fiscal Analysis I San Clemente CA • Market Analysis and Mixed -Use Development Feasibility Study I Chino CA • Downtown Market Assessment and TOD Feasibility Study I Fontana CA • Washoe County Economic Forecast and Analysis I Washoe County NV • Fresno Marketplace I Fresno CA
• Dole Foods Atwater Plan and Market Analysis I Atwater CA Economic Development Planning
• Economic Development Element and Economic Development Strategic Action Plan I Corcoran CA
• Re -envisioning Chino: Implementing the 2025 General Plan I Chino CA
EDUCATION
• MSc, Development Management,
London School of Economics
• Master of Urban and Environmental
Planning, University of Virginia
• BA, Urban Planning, Virginia Tech
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
• Urban Land Institute
AWARDS
• 2013 Best of the Best Award, ULI
Orange County/Inland Empire
WRCOG Sustainability Framework
• 2012 SCAG Compass Blueprint
Recognition Award, Achievement
in Sustainability I Re -envisioning
Chino: Implementing the 2025
General Plan
• Michael A. Hoffman Award (co -
recipient), Council of Virginia
Archaeologists I Acquisition and
Preservation of the Morgan Jones
Kiln Site, a National Register Site
Team member since 2007
PLACEWORKS A-7
STEVE GUNNELLS
Chief Economist
[email protected]
• Economic Development Feasibility Study for the California Community Foundation I EI Monte CA
• North Hemet Revitalization Plan I Riverside County CA • Economic Development Recommendations for the Southeast Industrial Area, SCAG Compass Blueprint Demonstration Project I Fullerton CA • Coachella Commercial Entertainment District Planning Study I Coachella CA Comprehensive Planning
• San Bernardino Countywide Plan I San Bernardino County CA • Bloomington Community Plan I Bloomington CA
• Westminster General Plan and EIR I Westminster CA
• Yucca Valley General Plan and EIR I Yucca Valley CA
• San Clemente General Plan and EIR I San Clemente CA
• Menifee General Plan and EIR I Menifee CA
• Industry General Plan Update and EIR I Industry CA
• Clovis General Plan Update and EIR I Clovis CA
• Economic Development Element, EI Monte General Plan I EI Monte CA • Economic Development Element, The Ontario Plan I Ontario CA • Strategic Plan Update: Community Profile and Environmental Scan I Torrance CA Urban and Regional Planning
• Sustainability Plan Framework, Western Riverside COG I Riverside County CA • 2015-2050 Growth Forecast Update I Kern Council of Governments • San Joaquin Valley Demographic Forecasts 2010 to 2050, Fresno COG I San Joaquin Valley CA
• Life on State Corridor Plan, Wasatch Front Regional Council I Multi - jurisdictional, Salt Lake County UT
• 5600 West BRT Phase I Station Area Plan I Salt Lake County UT • Development Options around Transit Stations, SCAG Compass Demonstration Project I Azusa CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
• Downtown Development Plan, Buena Vista Charter Township I Saginaw County MI
• Downtown Development Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan, Lyon Charter Township I Oakland County MI
• Development Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan, Van Buren Charter Township I Wayne County MI
• Tax -Increment -Financing Plan, Detroit Armory Redevelopment I Oak Park MI • Economic Development Program I Richmond County VA
• Overall Economic Development Program I Westmoreland County VA • Urban Development, Management, and Tourism Assessment, World Bank Republic of Yemen
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• "Rail and TOD: Getting on the Right Track" 12015 ULI OC/IE District Council Santa Ana CA
• "Economic Development for Planners" 12011 Southern California Association of Governments' Toolbox Tuesdays I Los Angeles CA
• "TOD and Downtown Development Opportunities" 12010 Downtown Fontana Technical Advisory Roundtable I Fontana CA
• "Mixed -Use Development: Myth or Must" (Panelist) 12009 Developer Conference, Multifamily Executive Conference I Las Vegas NV A-8
LEO DIPIERRO
Project Planner / GIS Analyst
In support of PlaceWorks' Planning Team, Leo assists with GIS- and planning- related tasks on a variety of projects in the Bay Area and beyond. Leo is well -versed in planning, interdisciplinary research, writing/formatting, GIS, and analytical/technical skills. He is also experienced in interpretation and collection of data from multiple sources, and has the ability to synthesize material to communicate findings effectively and concisely.
Leo plays a role on a variety of projects, including housing elements, ArcGIS web app development, general plan updates and buildouts, housing site selection and infill, transportation planning, facilities planning, design, and analysis. His key projects include facilities planning for Big Basin Redwoods State Park; development of housing tools for Solano County; general plan updates for Livermore, San Mateo, Hollister, and Santa Rosa among other cities; and wide-ranging facilities planning and web GIS solutions for the North Coast of Santa Cruz County.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• Big Basin Facilities Management Plan I Santa Cruz County CA • Livermore General Plan Update, Housing Element Update, and EIR Livermore CA
• SB 2 and LEAP/REAP Technical Assistance I Statewide CA • Coyote Valley Corridor Study I San Jose CA
• Solano Transportation Authority Multi -Jurisdictional Housing Element Solano County CA
• Santa Cruz County North Coast Facilities and Management Plan l Santa Cruz County CA
• Sacramento County Infill Program Update I Sacramento County CA • CCTA Ongoing Planning Services l Contra Costa County CA • Peninsula Open Space Trust Bay to Sea Trail Feasibility Study I San Mateo County CA
• San Mateo General Plan Update l San Mateo CA
• Marin County SB 1383 I Marin County CA
• California State Parks Cultural Arts, Interpretation, and Engagement Support Statewide CA
• SCAG Metrolink Station Area Analysis - Land Use and GIS Services I Southern California CA
• San Mateo County Multi -Jurisdictional Safety Element I San Mateo County CA
• Vacant and Underutilized Lot Inventory l Cudahy CA
• Santa Rosa General Plan Update & EIR I Santa Rosa CA
• Soledad General Plan Update & Housing Element Update I Soledad CA • Colfax General Plan and Housing Element l Colfax CA
EDUCATION
• BA, Geography, Humboldt State
University, CA
Team member since 2022
PLACEWORKS A_9
• Butte County General Plan Update I Butte County CA
• Placentia Chapman Corridor Revitalization I Placentia CA
LEO DIPIERRO
Project Planner / GIS Analyst
[email protected]
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
City of San Mateo I Planning Intern I 2021 - 2022
• Developed workflows for municipal -level planning and gained experience with a variety of development planning projects and scales, project reviews for code compliance, and code assessment
• Utilized GIS to develop maps, analyze data, and provide foundation for projects including housing element
• Assisted in community outreach and engagement with Zoom meetings, as well as additional projects involving graphical development and formatting of community materials
Yurok Tribe I Project Intern - GIS Ancestral Mapping 12020 • Assisted tribal officials in ongoing project mapping ancestral territory and historic land allotment using BIA & BLM primary data
• Processed data and developed additional data processing, analysis, and collection skills within ArcGIS Pro
• Actively communicated with tribal officials in relation to the processing, collection, and inclusion of data into relevant collections via Microsoft Teams Humboldt County Planning & Building Department I GIS Intern 2019 - 2020
• Acquired and processed GIS data in ArcMap and internal ArcGIS Online county web mapping services
• Worked closely alongside the county GIS coordinator assisting in ongoing data acquisition and analysis projects, communicating frequently around progress and methodology of data collection and processing • Developed Planning & GIS workflows
• Assessed prior data and determined necessary updates, additions, and changes in ArcGIS Online system
A-10
NICOLE VERMILION
Principal, Air Quality/Energy/GHG/Noise Services
Nicole oversees project staffing and timing for the air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), and noise technical team's impact evaluations under CEQA. She is responsible for expanding and fine-tuning the team based on changes in technology, legislation, and client needs and for ensuring that PlaceWorks air quality and GHG studies are defensible and consistent with recent case law. She closely follows the rapid changes in requirements and the latest information on CEQA thresholds and analysis methodology. She has performed numerous GHG emissions inventories for individual projects as well as citywide emissions inventories for general plans.
Nicole frequently presents at conferences, including the California Chapters of both APA and AEP. She is a beta tester for the CaIEEMod program. As a member of AEP's Climate Change Committee, Nicole has contributed to white papers addressing GHG emissions inventories for climate action plans and general plans, post -2020 GHG thresholds, and Friant Ranch.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Air Quality, GHG, and Energy Analyses
• Retail Centers and Mixed -Use Developments: Brea Mall Mixed -Use Project EIR (for this project, Nicole also managed the entire CEQA project in addition to leading technical analyses, Brea Plaza, Broadway Mixed -Use project in Redwood City; Serramonte Shopping Center Expansion in Daly City; Fresno El Paseo Marketplace in Fresno; Platinum Triangle Marketplace in Highland; San Leandro Shoreline Development; Butcher's Corner in Sunnyvale • Downtown/Town Center and Civic Center Projects: Norwalk Entertainment District -Civic Center Specific Plan EIR; Laguna Niguel Town Center; Men's Central Jail (Treatment Center) for LA County; Orange County Civic Center; Downtown Hayward Specific Plan; Atherton Civic Center; Walnut Creek Downtown Specific Plan; DeI Avenue Specific Plan
• Hotel Projects: Hyatt Regency Newport Beach; Courtyard Marriott Glendale; DeAnza and Village Hotels in Cupertino; Hilton Garden Inns in Walnut Creek and San Jose; Anabella Hotel Anaheim
• Corridor, TOD, Station Area Specific Plan EIRs: Valley Corridor, San Bernardino County; Connect Southwest LA TOD and West Carson TOD, Los Angeles County; Beach Boulevard, Anaheim; Midtown, Long Beach; Millbrae Station, Millbrae
• Senior Living and Medical Facility Projects: Newport Beach Vivante Senior Living; Torrance Memorial New Main Tower Project; DeI Amo Senior Village; Kaiser Medical Centers in Irvine and Anaheim; City of Hope Cancer Research Center Expansion in the cities of Duarte & Irwindale; The Springs at Bethsaida Senior Living in Tustin
EDUCATION
•
Master of Urban & Regional
Planning, University of California,
Irvine
BS with Honors, Ecology &
Evolutionary Biology, University of
California, Santa Cruz
BA with Honors, Environmental
Studies, University of California,
Santa Cruz
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
(APA)
• Association of Environmental
Professionals (AEP)
ACTIVITIES
• Climate Change Committee
California AEP
2023 Certificate of Appreciation
• CaIEEMod Beta -Tester I South
Coast Air Quality Management
District
Tea m
member since 2004
PLACEWORKS A-11
A-12
NICOLE VERMILION
Principal
[email protected]
• Industrial Projects: Proposed Rule 2305 Indirect Source Review — Warehouses Environmental Assessment for SCAQMD; Prologis Warehouse EIR in Los Angeles; CenterPoint Properties Warehouse at Greenleaf Avenue in Santa Fe Springs; Ontario Ranch Specific Plan EIR; Agua Mansa Logistics Center Addendum and Colton Southwest Regional Operations Center IS/ MND in Colton; 12+ warehouse/industrial projects in the City of Industry; 2000 Marina Boulevard Tech Studies- AQ/GHG in San Leandro; Cordes Ranch Annexation Specific Plan in Tracy; Dixon Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan Addendum in Dixon; CenterPoint Properties Warehouse in Richmond • General Plan EIRs: Counties of Contra Costa, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino and Cities of:
» Clovis » Newport Beach » Sierra Madre
» Cupertino » Palm Springs » Stockton
» El Monte » Palo Alto » Temple City
» Highland » Pasadena » Torrance
» Industry » Rancho Mirage » Tulare
» La Habra » San Clemente » Vacaville
» Menlo Park » San Leandro » Vallejo
» Morgan HiII » San Rafael » Westminster
» Newark » Santa Ana
CEQA Projects Managed by Nicole Vermilion
• Brea Mall Mixed -Use Project EIR I Brea CA
• City of Irvine CEQA Manual I Irvine CA
• General Plan EIRs: Corona, Los Alamitos, Ontario, Yucca Valley, Yucaipa • Specific Plan EIRs: Brea, Cal State Fullerton/City of Fullerton, Hemet, Yucaipa • Residential Project EIRs: Anaheim, Brea, Claremont, Mission Viejo • Colton Safety Element MND I Colton CA
• Agua Mansa Logistics Center Addendum I Colton CA
• Colton Southwest Regional Operations Center MND I Colton CA • Irvine Business Complex EIR and GHG Inventory I Irvine CA Additional Projects
• City of Industry Climate Action Plan I City of Industry CA • TIGER II Grant for the San Bernardino International Airport I Highland CA • Antelope Valley Area Plan EIR I County of Los Angeles CA • Concord Hills Regional Park EIR I East Bay Regional Parks District CA • 1700 Dell Avenue Office EIR I Campbell CA
• Measure E Bond Program CEQA and Site Assessment Services I Fremont
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• "Climate Change and Air Quality Workshop — Proposed Cumulative Air Toxics Thresholds" 12022 AEP CA State Conference I Yosemite CA • "A Diversity of Air Quality Thresholds for a Diverse State: Thresholds Concepts to Reflect Differences in Existing Pollution Burdens" 12021 AEP CA State Conference I Long Beach CA (Virtual) "All About the Offsets — Mitigating GHG Impacts with GHG Credits" I AEP February 2020 I Irvine CA • "CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds: The Past, Present and Future — Bracing for Climate Change: Strategies for Mitigation and Resiliency" I Air and Waste Management Association December 2019 I Santa Barbara CA • "Climate Change and Air Quality Workshop — Linking Project level emissions with Health Impacts: What does the Friant Ranch Case tell us? What is required for a CEQA analysis?" 12019 AEP CA State Conference I Monterey CA • "When is it Defensible to Mitigate CEQA GHG Emissions Impacts with GHG Credits?" 12019 AEP CA State Conference I Monterey CA
MALIA DURAND
Associate Principal
Malia Durand is a highly skilled environmental land use planner with over 16 years of experience in environmental review and urban planning. She is an adept problem solver and a strong leader with excellent communication and interpersonal skills.
Malia specializes in managing a wide variety of CEQA/NEPA public - and private- sector development projects. Her experience includes managing a team of urban and environmental planners and overseeing the production of numerous environmental projects, as well as planning and zoning projects throughout Southern California. She has also led and participated in critical negotiations with local, state, and federal resource agencies regarding impacts to sensitive habitat, jurisdictional resources, and species listed by the California and federal Endangered Species Acts.
Malia's responsibilities at PlaceWorks include project quality and defensibility, project management, mentoring staff, and helping to maintain and advance our environmental practice in Orange County and the Inland Empire.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• City of San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR I San Bernardino CA • City of Shafter 2023 General Plan Update and EIR I Shafter CA • Legacy Highlands Industrial Specific Plan EIR Peer Review I Beaumont CA • Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update EIR I Anaheim CA • Euclid & Heil Residential Project EIR Addendum I Fountain Valley CA • Glenneyre Street Lighting Project IS/MND I Laguna Beach CA • Chapman Yorba VIII, LLC- Builders Remedy/Density Bonus Mixed Use Project Environmental Review I Orange CA
• Kite Realty / Ontario Regal Cinemas Planned Unit Development I Ontario CA • Norwalk Entertainment District —Civic Center Plan Review Services I Norwalk CA • Corona City Park Revitalization Project CEQA I Corona CA • Oxford Preparatory Expansion Project IS/MND, Saddleback Valley USD I Lake Forest CA
• Granite Hills High School Athletics Complex Master Plan IS/MND, Apple Valley USD I Apple Valley CA
• Del Mar Hills Elementary School Rebuild Project, Del Mar Union Elementary School District I San Diego CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
Infrastructure Engineers (IE), a Bowman company I Brea CA While employed at IE as Director of Environmental and Planning Services, Malia was one of the firm's most versatile planners, with an innate ability to interact with clients and the public and achieve positive results. During her time at IE, Malia managed the following environmental and planning projects:
EDUCATION
• BS, Environmental Science, San
Diego State University
CERTIFICATIONS
• Certified Inspector of Sediment and
Erosion Control In -Training
(CISEC-IT)
AFFILIATIONS
• Association of Environmental
Professionals (AEP)
• Worldwide Women's Association
(W WA)
Team member since 2023
PLACEWORKS
A-13
MALIA DURAND
Associate Principal
[email protected]
• Bakersfield Industrial/Warehouse Project EIR I Bakersfield CA • Pasadena Environmental Peer Review Services (various projects under a long- term -contract for private development projects I Pasadena CA • Peer Review of Norwalk Entertainment District —Civic Center Specific Plan and EIR I Norwalk CA
• Lynwood Environmental Justice and Safety Elements Update I Lynwood CA • Lynwood Housing Element Update and IS/MND, 6th Cycle I Lynwood CA • Bell Gardens General Plan Zoning Consistency Analysis I Bell Gardens CA • LEAP Grant Application for and Preparation of the Huntington Park Housing Element Update (5th and 6th cycles) I Huntington Park CA • Adelanto Housing Element Update and IS/MND, 6th Cycle I Adelanto CA • Shafter Housing Element Update and IS/MND, 6th Cycle I Shafter CA • Wasco Housing Element Update and CEQA Exemption, 6th Cycle I Wasco CA County of San Diego, Department of Public Works I San Diego County CA As a Land Use and Environmental Planner at the County, Malia managed the environmental processing of Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs), from concept through construction and final mitigation sign -off. Projects included road improvements, bridge rehabilitation and construction, flood control facilities, dump remediation, and complex emergency repair projects. Malia conducted critical negotiations with local, state, and federal resource agency representatives for all permitting and compensatory mitigation associated with impacts to sensitive habitat, jurisdictional resources, and listed species.
She performed environmental code compliance, violation resolution, and environmental remediation, and maintained up-to-date knowledge of environmental laws, regulations, and policy governing both public and private development. During her time at the County, Malia frequently presented to members of the public, stakeholder groups, community planning groups, and representatives of state and federal regulatory agencies. She also spearheaded the development of numerous technological advances for essential county- wide programs, resulting in substantial labor and cost savings. Projects Malia was involved with include:
• Regional General Permit 53 Program MND I San Diego County CA • Lawson Valley Bridge Replacement Project MND I San Diego County CA • Valley Center Road Bridge Replacement Project MND I San Diego County CA • Cole Grade Road Widening Project EIR I San Diego County CA • All Emergency Public Works Projects CEQA/NEPA Processing I San Diego County CA
• Mitigation/Conservation Bank Liasson I San Diego County CA • Former Fallbrook Burn Dump 1C Remediation Project MND I San Diego County CA
LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNITY
• Co-founder of the Green -Spark organization, a 501c3 nonprofit that existed between 2007 and 2010 as a green rebuilding initiative group after the San Diego fires.
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• "Environmental Professionals of Orange County Career Panel," AEP, Orange County Chapter, Cal State University, Fullerton, 2023
A-14
CHRISTHI MROSLA
Associate
EDUCATION
Christhi has experience authoring CEQA compliance documents and advancing entitlement applications for all land use types, especially industrial developments in Southern California and the Inland Empire.
She has experience creating and managing the project consultant team to prepare technical reports, architectural/civil plans, and other various requirements to achieve CEQA compliance and project approval on over
3.5. million square feet of approved developments. She interfaces with lead agency contacts, members of the public, and State Clearinghouse representatives. Christhi has experience with preparing and presenting public meeting presentations.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• Bonita Vista High School Building and Site Improvement CE I Sweetwater Union HS District
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
• Church of the Woods EIR I Unincorporated San Bernardino County CA • Cottonwood and Edgemont Industrial Warehouse IS/MND I Moreno Valley CA • Banana and Rose Commerce Center Industrial Warehouse EIR Addendum Fontana CA
• Patterson Commerce Center Industrial Warehouse IS/MND I Perris CA
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• Panelist/ 2024 Association of Environmental Professional Career Panel/ University of California, Irvine
LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNITY
• Mentor, UC Irvine Physical Sciences Undergrad Mentorship Program, 2022- 2023
• Volunteer, Irvine Ranch Conservancy, 2018
AWARDS
• Dean's Honor List, UCI, 2015-16
• BA, Environmental Science,
University of California, Irvine
• Certificate in CEQA Practice,
University of California, San Diego
AFFILIATIONS
• Association of Environmental
Professionals (AEP)
Team member since 2024
PLACEWORKS A-15
CHRISTHI MROSLA
Associate
[email protected]
This page intentionally left blank.
A-16
EMILY PARKS
Associate, Air Quality/GHG/Ener gy
Emily is a member of the Environmental Team's air quality and greenhouse gas analysis group. She works on a broad array of environmental planning projects —from mixed -use, industrial, and transit -oriented design projects to comprehensive planning projects such as general plans and specific plans.
Emily joined PlaceWorks while earning her master's degree in environmental and ocean sciences at USD. As part of her graduate work, she developed a controlled laboratory study of California killifish and was awarded a grant in 2020 to help fund equipment and lab costs. She received additional funds to support a second summer of research on killifish.
Emily gained experience with public policy as an intern with the San Diego chapter of the Audubon Society. Here she led a team to gather resources and make specific recommendations to improve the climate strategy in the City of San Diego's Climate Action Plan.
Recommendations added to the CAP included measurable goals for the benefits of wetland restoration and riparian forest habitat as carbon sinks.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• The Ontario Plan Update EIR I Ontario CA
• Linbrook Villas CEQA Class 32 Categorical Exemption I Anaheim CA • VP1 Apple Office Project Initial Study I Cupertino CA • CEQA for 1655 South De Anza Boulevard Mixed -Use Project I Cupertino CA • Santa Rosa GP Update EIR I Santa Rosa CA
• UC College of Law EIR I San Francisco CA
• Amador School Consolidation EIR I Amador CA
• La Palma Park Improvements NEPA CE I Anaheim CA
• Irvine Business Complex Quart Office Addendum I Irvine CA AWARDS
• 2021 Stephen Sullivan Memorial Scholarship, University of San Diego • 2020 George Maier Fund Grant, University of San Diego
LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNITY
• Audubon Advocacy Training Internship, SD Audubon Society Chapter
EDUCATION
• MS, University of San Diego,
Environmental and Ocean Sciences
• BS, University of California, Santa
Barbara, Biological Sciences
AFFILIATIONS
• Association of Environmental
Professionals (AEP)
Team member since 2021
PLACEWORKS A-17
EMILY PARKS
Associate
[email protected]
This page intentionally left blank.
A-18
CHRIS SHIELDS
Senior Associate, Noise, Vibration, and Acoustics
Chris possesses a strong background in noise control, noise propagation, frequency analysis and engineering practices, coupled with extensive noise synthesis computer -modeling experience. His work experience includes the preparation of technical studies and related sections of CEQA and NEPA documents for commercial, industrial, residential, mixed -use recreation, educational, infrastructure, and other development projects. Chris' experience includes noise analyses for federal, state, and local agencies with the use of computer models published by the EPA, FHWA, and Caltrans.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• East Bay Regional Park District's North Point Isabel Stand Alone Report Richmond CA
• UC Berkeley Bancroft Parking Structure IS I Berkeley CA • Artesia Downtown Specific Plan EIR I Artesia CA
• Barstow General Plan EIR I Barstow CA
• Hollister General Plan EIR I Hollister CA
• Canyon Middle School ISMND for Canyon Valley USD I Castro Valley CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
• Feather River Levee Repair Project EIR I Yuba County CA • Rancho Cordova Suncreek Revised EIR/EIS I Rancho Cordova CA • The Ranch at Sunridge EIR/EIS I Rancho Cordova CA
• Prairie City State Vehicular Recreation Area General Plan and EIR I Rancho Cordova CA
• Citrus Heights General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, and EIR I Citrus Heights CA
• Capitol Villas Redevelopment Project EIR I Sacramento CA • Brookins Ranch Monitoring I Colusa County CA
• Atherton Drive Gap Closure IS/MND EA-FONSI I Manteca CA • Union Crossing EIR I Manteca CA
• Galt Wastewater Treatment Plant Pipeline Project I Galt CA • Lodi/Delta College Master Plan and EIR I San Joaquin County CA • Brockway Erosion Control Project IEC I Placer County CA • Martis Creek Lake Dam Safety Modification Study EIS I Nevada County CA • Elk Grove USD Cosumnes River Elementary School Expansion Project EIR I Elk Grove CA
• San Juan USD Rio Americano High School Sports Facilities Upgrade EIR Sacramento CA
• Crows Landing Industrial Business Park Specific Plan and EIR I Crows Landing CA • Folsom South of US Highway 50 Specific Plan EIR/EIS I Sacramento County CA • Natomas Levee Improvement Program EIR, EIS, and EIR/EIS I Sacramento County CA
EDUCATION
• BA, Environmental Studies (Minor
in Geology), California State
University, Sacramento
Team member since 2024
PLACEWORKS
CHRIS SHIELDS
Senior Associate, Noise, Vibration, and Acoustics
Chris possesses a strong background in noise control, noise propagation, frequency analysis and engineering practices, coupled with extensive noise synthesis computer -modeling experience. His work experience includes the preparation of technical studies and related sections of CEQA and NEPA documents for commercial, industrial, residential, mixed -use recreation, educational, infrastructure, and other development projects. Chris' experience includes noise analyses for federal, state, and local agencies with the use of computer models published by the EPA, FHWA, and Caltrans.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• East Bay Regional Park District's North Point Isabel Stand Alone Report Richmond CA
• UC Berkeley Bancroft Parking Structure IS I Berkeley CA • Artesia Downtown Specific Plan EIR I Artesia CA
• Barstow General Plan EIR I Barstow CA
• Hollister General Plan EIR I Hollister CA
• Canyon Middle School ISMND for Canyon Valley USD I Castro Valley CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
• Feather River Levee Repair Project EIR I Yuba County CA • Rancho Cordova Suncreek Revised EIR/EIS I Rancho Cordova CA • The Ranch at Sunridge EIR/EIS I Rancho Cordova CA
• Prairie City State Vehicular Recreation Area General Plan and EIR I Rancho Cordova CA
• Citrus Heights General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, and EIR I Citrus Heights CA
• Capitol Villas Redevelopment Project EIR I Sacramento CA • Brookins Ranch Monitoring I Colusa County CA
• Atherton Drive Gap Closure IS/MND EA-FONSI I Manteca CA • Union Crossing EIR I Manteca CA
• Galt Wastewater Treatment Plant Pipeline Project I Galt CA • Lodi/Delta College Master Plan and EIR I San Joaquin County CA • Brockway Erosion Control Project IEC I Placer County CA • Martis Creek Lake Dam Safety Modification Study EIS I Nevada County CA • Elk Grove USD Cosumnes River Elementary School Expansion Project EIR I Elk Grove CA
• San Juan USD Rio Americano High School Sports Facilities Upgrade EIR Sacramento CA
• Crows Landing Industrial Business Park Specific Plan and EIR I Crows Landing CA • Folsom South of US Highway 50 Specific Plan EIR/EIS I Sacramento County CA • Natomas Levee Improvement Program EIR, EIS, and EIR/EIS I Sacramento County CA
EDUCATION
• BA, Environmental Studies (Minor
in Geology), California State
University, Sacramento
Team member since 2024
PLACEWORKS
DINA ELCHAMMAS GASS PE,QSD
Senior Engineer
Dina is a member of the Environmental Planning team and Technical Services Group. She provides technical support related to hydrology, water quality, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and utilities, including third -party peer reviews, water supply assessments, written verifications of water supply, and utility capacity reports. Dina also has experience performing quantitative health risk assessments and pipeline safety hazard assessments.
Dina processes, oversees, and manages CEQA projects; contributes research, analysis, and review —particularly in the fields of water quality, hydrology, utilities, geology and soils, and hazards and hazardous materials; and prepares CEQA compliant documents.
Dina came to PlaceWorks with eclectic experience in the fields of sustainability, environmental engineering, and sustainable watershed management. She was an assistant professor of sustainability and an environmental engineer in the Gulf and Caspian regions, where she prepared and implemented environmental management plans; pollution prevention plans; and management plans for waste, water, and wastewater.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Hydrology/Water Quality, and Utilities
• On -Call Services for Water Supply Assessments and Written Verifications of Water Supply I Ontario CA
• Wine Country Specific Plan Water Demand and Supply Study I Yucaipa CA • Phase I of the Original Model Colony Adept Water Supply Assessment and Written Verification of Water Supply I Ontario CA
• Merrill Commerce Center Specific Plan Water Supply Assessment I Ontario CA • Ontario Ranch Business Park Specific Plan Water Supply Assessment Ontario CA
• Jackson Ranch Specific Plan Water Supply Assessment I Kettleman City CA • Westminster Mall Specific Plan Water Supply Assessment I Westminster CA • Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Third Party Review: Hydrology Report, LID Report, Sewer Study, Utility Study, and WSA I Irwindale CA • 4416 Azusa Canyon Road Tilt -up Warehouse Third Party Peer Review:
Hydrology Report, Hydraulics Report, and WQMP I Irwindale CA • Aqua Mansa Specific Plan Third Party Peer Review: Utility Report and WSA Jurupa Valley CA
• Disneyland Resort Four Diamond Hotel Third Party Peer Review: Hydrology Report, WQMP, and WSA Anaheim CA
EDUCATION
• Master of Engineering,
Environmental and Water
Resources Engineer, American
University of Beirut, Lebanon
• Bachelor of Engineering, Civil
Engineering, American University of
Beirut, Lebanon
• MA, East Asian Studies, Maharishi
University of Management,
Fairfield, Iowa
AFFILIATIONS
• California Stormwater Association
(CASQA)
REGISTRATIONS
• State of California Professional
Engineer No. 91182
• State Water Resources Board's
Qualified Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan Developer (QSD)
Team member since 2018
PLACEWORKS A-21
DINA EL CHAMMAS GASS
Senior Engineer
[email protected]
Environmental and Health Risk Assessments
• 4416 Azusa Canyon Road Tilt -up Warehouse Construction HRA I Irwindale CA • Etiwanda Avenue/Country Village Road Truck Restriction Ordinance Operational HRA Jurupa Valley CA
• Temecula Valley Charter School HRA I Riverside County CA • Villa Park High School Modernization Pipeline Risk Assessment I Orange CA • Solana Vista Elementary School Reconstruction Pipeline Risk Assessment Solana Beach CA
• Brownell Middle School Pipeline Risk Assessment I Gilroy CA CEQA
• Santa Ana General Plan EIR (2021) I Santa Ana CA
• San Bernardino Countywide Plan EIR I San Bernardino County CA • Walnut Business Park EIR I Walnut CA
• 1401 Quail Street Residential Project Addendum I Newport Beach CA • Landfill Gas to Energy Project IS/MND I Newport Beach CA • 4416 Azusa Canyon Road Tilt -up Warehouse Project IS/MND I Irwindale CA • Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan SEIR I Irwindale CA
• Wine Country Specific Plan SEIR I Yucaipa CA
• Freeway Corridor Specific Plan SEIR I Yucaipa CA
• Proposed Rule 2305, Warehouse Indirect Source Rule Environmental Assessment I South Coast Air Basin CA
• Agua Mansa Commerce Park Specific Plan EIR Jurupa Valley CA • Norwalk Civic Center EIR I Norwalk CA
• Newport Crossings Mixed Use Project EIR I Newport Beach CA • Laguna Niguel Town Center Mixed Use Project EIR I Laguna Niguel CA • Ontario Ranch Specific Plan EIR I Ontario CA
• Etiwanda Avenue/Country Village Road Truck Restriction Ordinance EIR Jurupa Valley CA
• UC Berkeley Long -Range Development Plan EIR I Berkeley CA • Whitmore Villa 66 -Unit Residential Project IS/MND I Monterey Park CA • San Rafael General Plan 2040 and Downtown EIR I San Rafael CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
• Crowe Creek State Revolving Fund Project I Fairfield IA • Baku Tbilisi Cheyhan Pipeline I Republic of Georgia
• Crescent New Gas Processing Plant I United Arab Emirates • Mitigation of NGL Plants Flares and RAG Utilization Project I Qatar • Dorood Project Onshore Facilities I Iran
• Expansion and Development of the Harweel Miscible Gas Injection Enhanced Oil Recovery Project l Oman
• Kashagan Field Development Project I Kazakhstan
PUBLICATIONS
• "Immerse in Your Watershed: Problem Based, Service Learning for Undergraduate Sustainability Education," The Journal of Sustainability Education, January 2017.
• "Potentiality of Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse in the Lebanon: A Case Study," Master's Thesis, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, 2003.
AWARDS
• 2002 Abd El Aal Research Award for the Advancement of Water Resource Engineering Research
A-22
STEVE BUSH PE
Senior Engineer
Steve's eclectic skill set covers a wide range of technical services. He leads our risk assessment practice, providing air toxics/health risk, pipeline safety, railroad safety, and EMF risk analyses for development projects and schools. As a member of the CEQA team's hydrology and engineering group, Steve has completed hydrology, water supply assessment and utilities systems analyses for a variety of projects, including residential development, industrial warehousing, and schools projects. He coordinates regularly with public agencies regarding pipeline risk analyses, flooding impacts, and other safety hazards for the preparation of CEQA sections. He is proficient in different air quality modeling software such as CaIEEMod, AERMOD, and HARP.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Environmental and Health Risk Assessments
• Health Risk Assessment for Mexico Plaza Residences I Lynwood CA • UC Berkeley LRDP Health Risk Assessment I Berkeley CA • Dam Inundation Study for Plumas Lake HS I Wheatland CA • Health Risk Assessment for CNG Fueling & Storage I Etiwanda CA • Health Risk Assessment & Railroad Safety Study for Eastside Neighborhood School I Riverside CA
• Pipeline/Railroad/Health Risk Assessments for Lomita Park ES I Millbrae CA • Los Angeles Unified School District EMF Guidance Revisions I Los Angeles CA • Dam Inundation Study for Brownell Middle School I Gilroy CA • Pipeline/EMF/Dam Inundation Studies for Blue Oak Academy I Visalia CA • Health Risk Assessment for Geffen Academy at UCLA I Westwood CA • Pipeline Safety Hazard Assessments for Jefferson School District I Tracy CA • Aboveground Water Tank Safety Hazard Assessment for Helen Keller ES Riverside CA
• Health Risk Assessment and Railroad Safety Study for Martin Luther King Jr Middle School I Hayward CA
• CNG and Propane Risk Assessment for Ramona Elementary School I Moreno Valley CA
Hydrology and Utilities
• Water Supply Assessment for Brea Mall Redevelopment Project I Brea CA • Conceptual Hydrology Study for Eastside Neighborhood School I Riverside CA • CEQA EIR Sections for City of San Rafael General Plan I San Rafael CA • CEQA EIR Sections for City of Los Banos General Plan I Los Banos CA • CEQA EIR Sections for City of Ontario General Plan I Ontario CA • CEQA EIR Sections for Broadway Plaza I Redwood City CA • Hydrology/FEMA Determination Study for New Elementary School I Gilroy CA
EDUCATION
• MS, Chemical Engineering,
University of California, Los Angeles
• BS, Chemical Engineering,
University of California, Santa
Barbara CA
REGISTRATIONS
• State of California Professional
Engineer No. 83997
AFFILIATIONS
• Air & Waste Management
Association (AWMA)
Team member since 2007
PLACEWORKS A-23
STEVE BUSH
Senior Engineer
[email protected]
Air Quality/GHG and CEQA
• 506 Brookside Drive Industrial Warehouse, Richmond CA • 101 Halcyon Drive Industrial Warehouse I San Leandro CA • Cupertino Village Hotel Project I Cupertino CA
Site Investigation
• Phase 1 ESA for Southeast Greenway Plan I Santa Rosa CA • Environmental Oversight of Remedial Action Plan for LAUSD Central Region Elementary School No. 20 I Los Angeles CA
• Site Remediation for former Sargent Industries Property I Huntington Park CA • Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for City Recreation and Parks I Los Angeles CA
• Fontana USD High School Site No. 5 I Fontana CA
• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for City of San Rafael Fire Station 52, and 57 I San Rafael CA
• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for City of San Rafael Public Safety Center I San Rafael CAHigh School No. 5 Alternate Sites EIR I Moreno Valley CA • Citrus Heritage Middle School IS/MND I Riverside USD
• Crummer Site Subdivision EIR I Malibu CA
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• "Translating CBIA v. BAAQMD: Bridging the Gap Between the Holding and Practice," 2017 AEP Conference, San Francisco, CA
• "Avoiding the Unequal Burdens of the Past: The Future Role of Environmental Justice in CEQA," 2018 AEP Conference, Rancho Mirage, CA
PUBLICATIONS
• With J. Curren, S. Ha, M. Stenstrom, S. Lau, and I.H. Suffet, "Identification of subwatershed sources for chlorinated pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in the Ballona Creek watershed," Science of The Total Environment 403, no. 13 (2011): 2525-33
• With M. Philibert, F. L. Rosario -Ortiz, and I. H. Suffet, "Advances in the characterization of the polarity of DOM under ambient water quality conditions using the polarity rapid assessment method," Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 8, no. 6 (2008): 725-733
AWARDS
• Engineering Honor Society, Tau Beta Pi, 2002
A-24
FEHR�' PEERS
Jason Pack, TE
Principal
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis, 1999
REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Traffic Engineer, State of California (TR2402)
RECOGNITIONS
WTS Honorable Ray LaHood Award Winner (Man of the Year) — Inland Empire Chapter (2023)
PRESENTATIONS
VMT Related Presentations:
• 2023 UCLA Land Use Law and Policy Conference
• 2022 National APA
• 2022 Western ITE
• 2022 CEAC Public Works Officers Institute
• 2022 SBCOG City/County Conference
• 2019 California APA
• 2019 CSU Facilities Conference
Future of Transportation Presentations:
• 2018 SBCTA City/County Conference
• 2017 WRCOG Planning Conference
Parking Presentations:
• 2018 OC Planning Directors Conference
• 2015 OC Planning Directors Conference
• 2011 SCAG Toolbox Tuesday
Emergency Evacuation Assessment — 2022 National APA
Conference
Multi -Modal Levels of Service — ULI SCIC
Innovative Interchange Designs — District 8 Professional Liaison Committee Meeting, 2011
Roundabout Operations and Feasibility — ASCE national
webinar series, 2011 through 2018
Process of Signal Coordination — ASCE national webinar series, 2011 through 2016
ABOUT
Jason D. Pack, P.E., is a Principal with Fehr & Peers located in Southern California. He is actively involved in a wide variety of project work but also finds time to lead the firm's research and development efforts in Emergency Evacuation assessment. Jason has an extensive background in travel demand forecasting, traffic operations assessment (including micro -simulation assessment), VMT analysis, big data analysis, transit ridership forecasting, and transportation impact studies involving NEPA and CEQA. His focus is to utilize his experience and the technical resources of the company to help clients answer their toughest questions related to mobility.
His recent work has included forecasting and operations assessment for large infrastructure improvements, developing recommendations for SB 743 implementation (California's new requirements to consider VMT as an impact metric under CEQA), assisting agencies with establishing VMT banks/exchanges, emergency evacuation assessment to respond to new legislative requirements (SB 99 and AB 747) and development of innovative transportation policies to assist City's advancing transportation into the future.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
CEQA/NEPA Assessment
Jason has completed transportation assessments for over 150 projects in support of CEQA or NEPA documentation. These include impact assessment to support negative declarations, transportation sections for EIRs, and transportation sections for EISs or joint EIR/EISs.
Jason has actively been involved in assisting jurisdictions with SB 743 implementation. Example projects are noted below:
• SBCTA SB 743 Countywide VMT SB 743 Implementation
Phase I, CA
• SBCTA SB 743 Countywide VMT SB 743 Implementation
Phase II (VMT mitigation bank/exchange program), CA
A-25
• WRCOG VMT SB 743 Implementation Study, CA
• North Orange County Collaborative VMT SB 743
Implementation Study/Guidelines, CA
• CSU SB 743 Guidelines, CA
• County of San Bernardino Transportation Impact
Study Guidelines, CA
• Corona SB 743 Implementation, CA
• Eastvale SB 743 Implementation, CA
• Moreno Valley SB 743 Implementation, CA
• Villages at Lakeview Traffic Impact Study, Riverside
County, CA
• Riverside Housing Element Traffic Impact Study, CA
General Plans
Jason has worked on a wide variety of General Plans
throughout the state of California, including:
• City of Rancho Cucamonga
• City of Palm Springs
• City of Indio
• City of Moreno Valley
• City of Carlsbad
• City of Redlands
• City of Corona
• City of Montclair
• City of Westminster
• County of San Bernardino
• City of Fountain Valley
• City of San Marcos
• City of Chico
• City of Saratoga
• City of Rancho Cordova
Most of these projects included Complete Street elements, extensive travel demand forecasting, and some level of multi - modal transportation assessment.
Specific Plans/Master Plans/Corridor Plans
Jason has completed assessment for more than 20 specific plans, master plans, and corridor plans. Key projects are identified below:
• Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan - Evaluated a
land use plan along Beach Blvd in Anaheim including
vehicle and multi -modal capacity assessment
• MAG High Capacity Transit Corridors Sustainability
Study — Evaluating the benefits of providing transit
oriented development along the high capacity transit
corridors in the greater Phoenix area
• RTC of Southern Nevada High Capacity Transit Study
— Evaluating the benefits of providing transit oriented development along the high capacity transit corridors
in the Las Vegas area
• Long Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan —
Completing the transportation recommendations and
A-26
assessment for this corridor in the City of Long Beach
including extensive multi -modal assessment
• Cal Poly Pomona Master Plan — Completed the
transportation recommendations and assessment of the
proposed University Master Plan
• Holt Boulevard Corridor Plan — Assessing the corridor in the City of Ontario to consider multi -modal opportunities along the corridor (including a Bus Rapid Transit
application)
• Wine Country Community Plan — Assisted Riverside
County in developing a travel demand forecasting model
and evaluation of the plan for the Temecula Wine Country Area
• CollegeTown Specific Plan — Assessing redevelopment of the block south of the Cal State Fullerton Campus
including the closure of Nutwood Avenue, application of a street car through the project, and mixed -use
development on the site (including Hope International
University, retail, housing, and other development
opportunities)
• San Bernardino Bus Rapid Transit TOD Overlay Study —
Assisting in developing transportation strategies in support of TOD along the SBx BRT system
Interchange and Corridor Studies
Jason has completed the Traffic Report for numerous transportation infrastructure studies throughout California. The most notable of these studies are described below:
• San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), I-15 Express Lanes PS&E, San Bernardino County, CA.
• Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), I-15 Express Lanes Southern Extension (ELPSE) PA&ED,
Riverside County, CA.
• I-15 Corridor Operations Project (COP) PA&ED, Corona, CA
• I-15 Interim Corridor Operations Project (ICOP) PA&ED, Corona, CA
• I-10 Truck Climbing Lane PA&ED and PS&E, Yucaipa, CA
• I-10 Mt. Vernon PA&ED, Colton, CA
• SR -60 Archibald PSR/PDS, PA&ED, PS&E Ontario, CA
• I-10/Alabama PSR/PDS and PA&ED, Redlands, CA
• I-15 Central (SR -74) PA&ED and PS&E, Lake Elsinore, CA • I-15 Main Street Electrical Support, Lake Elsinore, CA • I-15 Nichols PSR/PDS, Lake Elsinore, CA
• I-15 Franklin PS&E and environmental revalidation, Lake Elsinore, CA
• SR -210 Victoria PA&ED, Highland, CA
• I-10 Wildwood PSR and PA&ED, Yucaipa, CA
• I-10 Cherry Valley PA&ED, Calimesa, CA
• I-10 Pennsylvania DEER Support, Beaumont, CA
• I-10 Highland Springs PA&ED, Beaumont, CA
• I-10 Monroe PSR/PDS and PA&ED, Indio, CA
• I-10 Jackson PSR/PDS and PA&ED, Indio, CA
• SR -60 Rubidoux PSR/PDS, Jurupa Valley, CA
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State
University, Pomona, CA (2011)
REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Traffic Engineer, CA (TR2797)
PRESENTATIONS
Is Evacuation Planning Giving CPR to LOS in
CEQA?, APA California, 2023
SB 743 in OC, City Engineers Association of
Orange County (CEAOC), 2020
SB 743 in Riverside & San Bernardino, Institute of
Transportation Engineers Riverside/San
Bernardino Chapter (RSBITE), 2020
Preparing For A Post VMT World Apocalypse,
Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP)
Conference, 2020
EXPERTISE
CEQA Transportation Impact Analysis
Travel Demand Modeling and VMT Forecasting
Long Range Development Plans
Parking and Circulation Studies
Emergency Evacuation Analysis
ABOUT
Mr. Herrmann is a Project Manager and Office
Leader in the Fehr & Peers Orange County and
Inland Empire Office. He has fourteen years of
experience in traffic engineering and
FEHRk PEERS
Paul Herrmann, TE
Senior Associate
transportation planning. He has led a wide variety of projects including traffic studies, infrastructure projects, travel demand forecasting, parking and circulation studies, and long-range development plans. Mr. Herrmann is an expert in SB 743 Implementation and VMT Analysis for CEQA projects. Mr.
Herrmann is also an active member in the Fehr & Peers SB 743, Evacuation Planning and Safety Working Groups which hold weekly discussions on evolving industry best practices. He is also an active member in Fehr & Peers' Parking and Land Use in Transportation Discipline Group.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
CEQA/NEPA Assessment
Paul has completed transportation assessments for over 100 projects in support of CEQA or NEPA documentation. These include impact assessment to support negative declarations, transportation sections for EIRs, and transportation sections for EISs or joint EIR/EISs.
Significant environmental transportation impact assessments that Paul has led are noted below:
• Chapman Corridor Plan, Placentia, CA
• CollegeTown Specific Plan & EIR, Fullerton, CA
• Ontario Ranch Sports Park Specific Plan TIA & EIR, Ontario, CA • Fairview Development Center Specific Plan TIA & EIR, Costa Mesa, CA
• Villages at Lakeview TIA & EIR, Riverside County, CA
• Riverside Housing Element Traffic Impact Study, CA
• Ontario Airport Cargo Facility EIR, Ontario, CA
• Classic Club (Northstar) Specific Plan & Acrisure Arena Amendment TIA & VMT Assessment, Palm Desert, CA
• Classic Club Specific Plan Addendum, Palm Desert, CA
• Beach Boulevard Corridor Plan Traffic Study and EIR, Anaheim, CA • Subarea 29 Residential Project Subsequent EIR, Ontario, CA • Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan/EIR, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
• City of Anaheim Beach Boulevard Corridor Plan Traffic Study and EIR, Anaheim, CA
• Gateway at Grand Terrace Specific Plan EIR, Grand Terrace, CA A-27
• Section 31 Specific Plan EIR, Rancho Mirage, CA,
• Crossings Specific Plan Traffic Study & EIR, Fountain Valley, CA.
• Long Beach Blvd Specific Plan, Long Beach, CA
• South East Area Specific Plan, Long Beach, CA
Paul has actively been involved in assisting jurisdictions with SB 743 implementation and writing City's Transportation Impact Study Guidelines. Example projects are noted below:
• Anaheim SB 743 Implementation and TIA Guidelines
• Santa Ana SB 743 Implementation and TIA Guidelines
• Aliso Viejo SB 743 Implementation and TIA Guidelines
• Fountain Valley SB 743 Implementation and TIA
Guidelines
• Corona SB 743 Implementation and TIA Guidelines
• Eastvale SB 743 Implementation and TIA Guidelines
• Moreno Valley SB 743 Implementation & Impact Fee
Feasibility Study
• Ontario SB 743 Update and TIA Guidelines, CA
• Hemet SB 743 Implementation and TIA Guidelines
Emergency Evacuation Planning
Paul has managed several emergency evacuation assessments consistent with AB 747, AB 1409, and SB 99. For all the projects noted below, Fehr & Peers would meet with City Staff and local fire department and police department representatives to identify critical emergency scenarios to study. We utilized information available in the local travel demand models to assist in estimating evacuating populations (residents, employees, students) and evacuation route capacity to
estimate evacuation travel times. Example projects are noted below:
• General Plan Update Evacuation Assessments:
o Moreno Valley, CA
o Lake Elsinore, CA
o Chino, CA
• Safety Element Update Evacuation Assessment:
o Richmond, CA
o Lafayette, CA
• Housing Element Update Evacuation Assessment:
o Calabasas, CA
• Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Evacuation Assessment
o Ontario, CA
• Evacuation Assessment Peer Reviews:
o Hills Preserve Residential, Anaheim, CA
General Plans
Paul has worked on a wide variety of General Plans throughout the state of California, including development of the Circulation Element and preparation of the transportation impact analysis, for the following cities:
A-28
• City of Ontario
• City of Chino
• City of Lake Elsinore
• City of Moreno Valley
• City of Redlands
• City of Corona
• County of San Bernardino
• City of Fountain Valley
• City of Diamond Bar
• City of Los Alamitos
• City of Anaheim
• SGVCOG Cities
o Pomona
o Diamond Bar
o Monterey Park
Parking Studies
Paul has completed numerous parking assessments. Key
studies are identified below:
• Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Casino Studies in Palm Springs, Cathedral City and Rancho Mirage,
CA
• 100 E. Ocean Boulevard Hotel Project, Parking, Traffic & TDM Study, Long Beach, CA
• Downtown Fullerton Parking Study, Fullerton, CA
• Cotino Story Living By Disney Shared Parking Study,
Rancho Mirage, CA
On -Call Consulting Services
Paul serves as an on -call consultant for several cities and agencies for traffic engineering and planning services. Key active on -call contracts are noted below.
• City of Eastvale Traffic Engineering and Planning
• Cal Poly Pomona Transportation Design and Planning
Services
• City of Santa Ana CEQA Peer Review
• City of Corona Transportation Study Peer Review
• City of Menifee CEQA Peer Review
• City of Anaheim Public Works and Community
Development
• City of Diamond Bar TIA & CEQA Peer Review
• City of Fontana TIA & CEQA Peer Review
EDUCATION:
• Master of Environmental Science and Management
Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and
Management University of California, Santa Barbara
• BS, Science - Ecology and Systematic Biology
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:
• Certif ed Professional in Stormwater Quality
• QSD/QSP Certif ed
AFFILIATIONS:
• BIA/Southern California
> National Association of Environmental Professionals
• Urban Land Institute
• U.S. Green Building Council
Fuscoe Team Member Since 2001
Fuscoe Principal Since 2011
IAN ADAM
MESM, CPSWQ, QSD
VP, Specialty Practices
Irvine, CA
Ian is Vice President, Specialty Practices and Fuscoe's Stormwater Management team leader. H is specialty is water resources, with an emphasis in water quality regulations, sea -level rise policy, Clean Water Act Citizen Suits and resource agency negotiation. Since joining Fuscoe in 2001, Ian has served as an effective leader and technical resource for numerous projects and clients. Ian has worked on over 80 General Plan Updates and Specif c Plans throughout California to assist municipalities and developers with infrastructure assessments, zoning approvals, EIR technical support and long term capital improvement planning.
For the past decade, Ian's experience with local and regional professional thoroughbred stabling operations has led to him to become an expert on CAFO NPDES permitting, including the negotiation of unique individual permits with the top management levels of all three Southern California Regional Water Quality Control Boards (San Diego, Santa Ana and Los Angeles). This expertise also includes providing assistance with the resolution of multiple third party lawsuits against commercial stabling operators.
Ian has also worked extensively in the California Coastal Zone, processing Coastal Development Permits, addressing Sea -Level Rise technically and politically, and working in partnership with Coastal Staff on individual projects, Specifc Plans and Local Coastal Programs. Through this experience, Ian is uniquely trained to address complex drainage and water quality projects for both public and private clients, especially those needing site-specifc solutions, multi -phased schedules and high-level regional board involvement. For the past two years, Ian has been assisting local municipalities and counties on regional stormwater improvement projects, including both feasibility and f nal design.
Ian enjoys the continuing pursuit of leadership development and is highly motivated by helping team members evolve into independent thinkers and leaders themselves. Ian's notable long-term clients include: City of Anaheim, Del Mar Fairgrounds, Orange County Fairgrounds, Los Angeles Turf Club and Del Mar Thoroughbred Club.
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:
• City of Long Beach Southeast Area Specif c Plan, Long Beach, CA • City of Santa Ana General Plan Update, Santa Ana, CA
• Freeway Corridor Specif c Plan, Yucaipa, CA
• Arrowhead Highway Mixed Use District Specif c Plan, Montclair, CA
F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G'
EDUCATION:
> MS, Civil Engineering, California State University,
Long Beach
• BS, Civil Engineering, California State University,
Long Beach
REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:
> PE CA#52976
• QSP/D CA #20169
• Coastal Engineering Certif cate, Old Dominion
University, VA
AFFILIATIONS:
> American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Fuscoe Team Member Since 2013
A-30
SUSAN WILLIAMS, PE, MS,
QSD/P
Technical Manager
Susan has 25+ years of experience in the civil engineering f eld of water resources for land development and public works. She is a very conscientious and responsible Technical Manager who acts as a central design team leader.
Susan is highly prof cient in designing the layout of project drainage facilities using applicable design standards, agency processing requirements and client expectations. Her specialties include drainage design (hydrology, hydraulics, stormwater) and preparation of H&H reports (including Drainage Reports, SWDR, WQMP, SWPPP, SUSMP) and construction plans (PS&E).
She also has expertise in sewer and water design as well as preparation of hydraulic calculations, report and construction plans. Susan ensures quality of design and implements new ideas through communication, teamwork, supervision, participation, plan reviews and training/coaching/mentoring of junior staff.
Susan has provided services for a wide range of projects including mixed use developments, affordable housing, retail/commercial, master planned communities and various parks. More recently, Sue has been overseeing a team of engineers perform infrastructure assessments and CEQA technical reports for various specific plans and general plan updates. She has worked with clients such as Irvine Company Apartment Communities, Brookfield Residential, Sares-Regis Group, Alliance Residential, Lyon Living, KB Home, Costco Wholesale, Cities of Irvine, Anaheim, Brea and Newport Beach, among others.
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:
• Artesia Downtown Specif c Plan & EIR
• Costa Mesa Fairview Specif c Plan & EIR
> South Bristol Specif c Plan & EIR
F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G'
Jj
CHAPMAN CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION
Cohesive and Integrated Corridor Development
PlaceWorks will tailor development standards and design guidelines for Chapman Avenue and the immediate neighborhood. By implementing new mixed -use General Plan land use designations, the corridor will allow for an integrated land use pattern that encourages multimodal travel, walkability, mixed -use development, mid -density residential, public/private open space opportunities, and high -quality urban design that incentives redevelopment.
The goal is to encourage a network of cohesive development that revitalizes the corridor, provides a path to the Old Town and Packing House Districts, and anchors the westerly city boundary with the City's Civic Center. PlaceWorks is leading community outreach and preparation of this plan, which is expected to be completed in July.
Location
Placentia, California
Size
1 mile
Client
City of Placentia
Date Completed
In progress
Services Provided
Community Participation, Transit
Planning & Design, Corridor Planning,
Graphic Design
PLACEWORKS A-31
FAIRVIEW DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER
Specific Plan and EIR
FAIRVIEW
DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER
SPECIFIC PLAN
WHAT'S YOUR VISION FOR FDC?
iCUAL ES. ISION PA : A FDC?
BPpd 1° ,3
'H THE TABLE. DO ANY REP pPha, �' / )N FOR .A T^ (®) 'nit BELOW - 1e,�.1 O ,N B 'ION TO .-° fJ�'� YY
7 kit VI • but -`
�y SA. LALGU RE • `5 ,A FDC, 6 11 !A
SA,.
\ IB' GAR un.,-. .ICAC16N _ .�o°6- �. N. tomns
°
In September of 2023, the City of Costa Mesa initiated the preparation of a Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report to coordinate and facilitate transition of the Fairview Developmental Center (FDC) to a mixed use, mixed income housing community. The FDC is a State-owned property and the State Department of Developmental Services, State Department of General Services, and the City of Costa Mesa will partner on future disposition of the site.
The City's 6th Cycle Housing Element lists the FDC as a housing opportunity site and estimates 2,300 housing units for the location.
Through this process the State will likely sell or lease the FDC site to an owner/developer who would develop the site consistent with the Specific Plan. The FDC Housing Plan is an exciting opportunity for the City to plan for a new neighborhood for Costa Mesa.
A-32
Location
Costa Mesa, California
Size
114 acres
Client
City of Costa Mesa
Date Completed
In Progress
Services Provided
Community Visioning and
Engagement, Specific Plan, Market
Feasibility, Existing Conditions
Analysis, Environmental Impact Report
and Technical Studies
PLACEWORKS
BEACH BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
A Specific Plan and EIR for The Heart of West Anaheim
Location
Anaheim, California
The Beach Boulevard Specific Plan is the result of a focused and comprehensive effort involving the City of Anaheim and the West Anaheim Community. This plan guides future development along a
1.5 -mile stretch of Beach Boulevard between the cities of Buena Park and Stanton. Supported by modern development standards, economic and sustainable community development incentives, and capital improvements, the plan holistically addresses the future of Beach Boulevard —the heart of West Anaheim.
Though designated a "high quality transit corridor," Beach Boulevard still functions primarily for motor vehicles, and nonmotorized modes such as walking and biking are not well integrated. The intent of the plan is to create a new regulatory environment, land use plan, development incentives, and streetscape enhancements to improve conditions along the boulevard and attract economic investment to the area.
The plan's vision and guiding principles were created with the community and reflect the themes that emerged throughout the process. Public involvement included in -person and online components.
The project was approved by a unanimous city council vote in November 2018.
Size
1.5 miles
Client
City of Anaheim
Date Completed
November 2018
Services Provided
Specific Plan, Community Outreach,
EIR
PLACEWORKS A-33
Jj
THE EL CAMINO PLAN
Creating a Regional Identity
INTMCONMSC1014 TRAIL MEN
Location
Atascadero, California
EI Camino Real is the gateway to Atascadero's downtown. The look, feel, and content of this five -mile corridor has a significant bearing on the city's regional identity, local character, and economic health. Although it has great potential to be a vibrant downtown for shopping, dining, and small businesses, it has been slow to recover from the Great Recession.
With high vacancies and nondescript buildings, it currently struggles to compete with nearby Paso Robles and other commercial areas.
PlaceWorks developed the EI Camino Plan, whose goal is to identify future land uses and guide urban design concepts with circulation improvements. This project will set a new course for EI Camino Real with a combination of strategic public realm investments and incentives for new development. We have provided the city with a custom strategy and set of tools to transform this automobile -oriented, regional corridor into a multimodal economic hub.
Elements of the corridor plan include the formation of new districts; modernization of zoning regulations; dynamic site design concepts for key areas; contemporary architectural style guidelines that also honor local history; streetscape design; and bicycle and pedestrian improvements to address safety concerns. The plan also includes strategies for business attraction, retention, and investment.
A-34
Size
5 linear miles
Client
City of Atascadero
Date Completed
2020
Services Provided
Market Demand Analysis, Community
Workshops, Online Surveys, Urban
Design and Mobility Analysis,
Alternative Land Use and District
Concepts, Mobility Improvement
Recommendations, Land Use and
Architecture Recommendation,
Streetscape Design
PLACEWORKS
HARBOR MIXED -USE TRANSIT CORRIDOR
Creating a Place for People
Location
Santa Ana, California
PlaceWorks helped the City of Santa Ana evaluate zoning designations along transit corridors throughout Santa Ana to expand land use options and establish an urban fabric that takes advantage of transportation improvements. A combination of vacant and underutilized land, bus rapid transit investments, future fixed guideway facilities, and desirable freeway and regional access make Harbor Boulevard an ideal candidate for reinvestment and new development opportunities.
PlaceWorks subsequently developed the Harbor Corridor Plan and laid the foundation for a more livable corridor through form -based zoning that allows new housing and mixed -use development opportunities, the safe integration of cars, buses, bicycles, and pedestrians along a six -lane roadway, and design guidelines the create a stronger identity for the residents and businesses.
PlaceWorks conducted an extensive three-year outreach program consisting of over 20 public meetings, including an idea fair and bus tour, neighborhood meetings, focus groups with property/business owners and developers, a joint workshop with the Circulation Element Update, and three study sessions with the Planning Commission. After adoption, the plan immediately drew interest from multiple developers for new residential and mixed -use projects.
2 linear miles
Client
Southern California Association of
Governments and the City of Santa
Ana
Date Completed
October 2014
Services Provided
Land Use/Corridor Planning, BRT/
TOD Station Planning, Public
Outreach, Form -Based Zoning,
Specific Plan Development, Market
Analysis, Infrastructure Analysis,
Implementation and Financing, EIR
Awards
2015 Comprehensive Planning, APACA
& APACA-OC
PLACEWORKS A-35
MIDTOWN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN & EIR
Improving Life on the Boulevard
Location
Long Beach, California
Long Beach Boulevard suffered from a lack of development interests and mobility problems along the corridor and in the surrounding community. Despite years of transit investments and the adoption of a planned development district (PD 29) for mixed -use and high -density development, the corridor continued to falter. The city selected a team, including PlaceWorks, to create the Midtown Specific Plan to stimulate private and public improvements and development in an area without the benefit of redevelopment powers.
The specific plan establishes an equitable balance between mobility modes —car, light rail, bus, bike, and pedestrian —and uses a hybrid form -based / zoning approach, incentive programs, park -once -and -walk strategies, and urban/streetscape design to achieve city and community goals for this key corridor.
The specific plan divides the boulevard into four districts: transit nodes, corridors, medical district, and open space. Density and major mobility improvements are planned for the transit node districts surrounding each of the three Metro Blue Line stations in the area. The plan implements many of the goals, policies, and strategies in the city's general plan mobility element. Most notably, the open space district of the specific plan proposes 11 new parklets, which cap side streets to create mini parks and provide much needed active and passive A-36
Size
2.5 -mile corridor' 369 acres
Client
City of Long Beach
Date Completed
Specific Plan Adopted and EIR Certified
2016
Services Provided
Specific Plan, Form -Based Coding, EIR,
Outreach, Technical Studies for AQ/
GHG, and Health Risk Assessment
Awards
2017 Sustainability Award: Integrated
Planning, SCAG
2017 Outstanding Planning Document
Award, California AEP
PLACEWORKS
open space in the area. Succinct land use districts, clear development standards and design guidelines, and a practical implementation program make this plan a valuable tool for future revitalization of Midtown.
The program -level environmental impact report (EIR) addressed various environmental and technical issues and challenges. For example, a detailed historic resources technical report analyzed potential impacts of demolishing existing buildings, many of which were more than 50 years old. The EIR also addressed and resolved key issues related to construction impacts on air quality and noise emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, transportation and traffic, and utilities and service systems.
The city council unanimously and enthusiastically certified the EIR and adopted the specific plan in May 2016.
I iIWr_ c II Ps'u!IIII q rL IllllII
W SPRING ST F•
W 81,1 ST
W WILLOW ST l_
W 5TH s I �
E-SHUNG=ST=
ArgiaMIL
gar
—E:HILL ST=
Ls3t -215
iw M.,.,
L... .� E 20TH ST
— I EI9TX
wirmiri11
l _EE VnCIFlf_<OAST=E
SI
..P.ZAMMLm
_ ..•
7■ J.�I I1
ST
E ,e's1 . —F-NEW X
I OM
inrr�j E_AHAHERA
I n__
PLACEWORKS
A-37
ARTESIA DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AND EIR
Preparing for the Future Rail Line
USA Si
MIXED -use
ANCHOR
North Focus Area Preferred Concept
The City of Artesia kicked off creation of the Artesia Downtown Saecific Plan in May 2023 with a completion goal of early 2025, anticipating the new Southeast Gateway Metro Rail line connecting Artesia with Los Angeles Union Station. Funded by Metro Transit Oriented Communities grants, the Downtown Specific Plan will dictate the scale of future development growth and opportunity in Artesia's downtown district and curate community gathering spaces, enhance pedestrian and bicyclist experience, and create new housing opportunities.
Just under 100 acres in total area, the Specific Plan anticipates between 1,000 and 2,000 new residential units in various urban development types, fulfilling a significant portion of the city's housing element obligations. Additionally, the plan imagines possibilities for a downtown - serving parking structure and civic uses through a P3 public -private partnership.
A-38
Location
Artesia, California
Size
100 acres
Client
City of Artesia
Date Completed
In Progress
Services Provided
Community Outreach, Urban
Design, Zoning Code, Specific Plan,
Environmental Impact Report
PLACEWORKS
Jj
LOS ALAMITOS COMMERICIAL CORRIDORS PLAN
Reclaiming our Corridors
Location
Los Alamitos, California
w�W
46*
As Southern California grew during the 1950s and 60s, two corridors— Katella Avenue and Los Alamitos Boulevard —widened to serve the growing automobile traffic. Katella served primarily as a major inter- and intracounty east —west transportation corridor, and Los Alamitos Boulevard provided key north —south connections to and from Interstates 405 and 605. Today, these two corridors combine to produce an intersection that processes up to 123,000 automobiles per day. The corridors continue to serve as auto -oriented arterials and, despite hosting nearly all of the City's commercial development, offer few central nodes or gathering places for the residents, students, and workers of Los Alamitos.
The Katella and Los Alamitos corridors have the bones of great corridors.
Key civic, institutional, and commercial anchors dot the corridors. The rights -of -way are wide enough to accommodate multiple modes of transportation while preserving efficient travel for the large volumes of traffic that use the corridors to access local destinations, adjacent cities, and nearby freeways. Additionally, other agencies are planning transportation investments that could influence the corridor study area.
PlaceWorks helped the City of Los Alamitos analyze its two most significant corridors and identify opportunities to capitalize on the forthcoming BRT routes and stations, stimulate new private investment and redevelopment, and create a new downtown for its residents.
PlaceWorks generated roadway and streetscape designs to narrow the City's primary north —south corridor to create a walkable and multimodal environment that can still efficiently convey auto traffic.
Size
240 acres
Client
City of Los Alamitos
Date Completed
June 2010
Services Provided
Visioning, BRT and Circulation
Planning, Economic Studies,
Feasibility Analysis, Corridor Design
and Planning, Commercial Design
Guidelines
PLACEWORKS
A-39
Jj
DOWNTOWN BELLFLOWER SPECIFIC PLAN
Creating a Thriving, Experience -Oriented Transit District Location
Bellflower, California
PlaceWorks developed the Downtown Bellflower Station Area Specific Plan to help the City achieve its goals for comprehensive and quality development in the targeted areas and combine the city's goals for the downtown area with the benefits of the West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. The corridor will connect to a wide range of destinations in Los Angeles and Orange counties and create opportunities for the city to reintroduce Bellflower as a thriving, experience -oriented district.
This groundbreaking specific plan will create synergy between uses along the transit line, encouraging a thriving and well-rounded regional economy. A market analysis revealed that Downtown Bellflower has potential as an experience -oriented destination that prioritizes walkability and comfort for shopping, dining, recreation, and entertainment. By modernizing and consolidating outdated zoning codes and permitted uses, the specific plan will better balance land uses and encourage development throughout the study area, particularly in areas that have struggled to see successful development in the past. Its goals are to attract a range of new development, encourage multimodal transportation, and improve access to employment centers.
PlaceWorks also conducted a parking management study that summarizes existing parking inventory, evaluates long-term trends, and makes recommendations for planning and managing parking for the area.
A-40
Size
400 acres
Client
City of Bellflower
Date Completed
October 2019
Services Provided
Specific Plan Preparation, Existing
Conditions Report, Market Analysis,
Parking Management Study, Land Use
Plan, Design Guidelines, Development
Standards, Mobility Plan, Community
Outreach
PLACEWORKS
FEHR PEERS
Chapman Corridor Specific Plan
Placentia, CA, 2022 -Present
Fehr & Peers provided corridor planning support and transportation impact analysis for CEQA purposes for the Chapman Corridor Specific Plan. Fehr & Peers prepared existing and potential roadway improvement cross sections on multiple segments along the Chapman Avenue corridor to evaluate potential changes. Fehr & Peers incorporated land use information, tested multiple future year buildouts, and prepared forecasts with the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM). The turning movement forecasts were tested in Vistro per the City's adopted LOS policy. Fehr & Peers assessed future intersection operations and identified improvements to address LOS deficiencies. Fehr & Peers also prepared a sensitivity analysis to develop a reduced intensity alternative that would result in no LOS deficiencies and would not require transportation infrastructure improvements.
A-41
FEHR PEERS
North Orange County Collaborative SB 743 Implementation Orange County, CA, 2019-2020
Fehr & Peers prepared strategies and tools for seven cities (Placentia, Fullerton, La Habra, Orange, Brea, Buena Park, and Yorba Linda) in Orange County to implement SB 743. We evaluated the travel demand model, developing baseline VMT data, and evaluating potential thresholds and mitigation measures and programs. We developed an interactive spreadsheet tool that will enable users to assess VMT project - specific impacts and VMT reduction measures. We prepared draft significance criteria and identified up to 8 projects throughout the County to "test" through the significance criteria. We also prepared updated Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for each city.
NOCC+
0 North Orange County Collaborative VMT Traffic Study Screening Tool Project Information
Project Name
Sample Project Name Here
Parcel Number (OCT.AMT.AZ#419 }
374-521-05
Opening Year
2021
Screening Criteria for Orange
Is the project location in a Transit Priority .Area?
Is the project location in a IOW Vtv1T generating zone? Is the Project one of these land use types?
•:o:•(show land use types}
Does the project generate fewer than 110 dailytrips?
(enter project land use in the section below)
No
No
No
The Project does not meet screening criteria. Please Continue No
Project Land Use Information
Residential Single Family Homes
Residential r•lultiFamily Homes
Office
Retail
Industrial
Private School
University
Entertainment
Hotel
Unit
0 Dwelling Units
300 Dwelling Units
30.000 1.000 Sqaure Feet
22.000 • 1.000 Sqaure Feet
0.000 1.000 Sqaure Feet
0 Students
0 Students
0.000 1.000 Sqaure Feet
0 Rooms
Project Trips and VMT Information
vrlT Methodology Origin Destination (OD}
Daily Trips' 3772 Average Trip Length' 8.1 Service Population' 921 VMT per service population 33.0
Project VMT Thresholds Comparison
▪ OPR Guidance (15% Below Existing}
▪ GHG Reduction Targets (14.3% Below Existing)
❑� Below Existing
[ Betterthan General Plan Buildout
33 33
31 30
29 2e
2]
25 25
24 23
22 21
2n
31 ?
VMT Comparison
33.0 31.3
Fisting VW per send ce pew tau on Project VW" per service po pulation FEHR'3PEERS
6P6
A-42
FEHR PEERS
CollegeTown Specific Plan & EIR
Fullerton, CA, 2011-2016
The CollegeTown Specific Plan EIR proposes to create a downtown -style marketplace in the area between Nutwood, Chapman, State College, and State Route 57 (SR 57). The redevelopment project will include residential, retail, improved pedestrian facilities and connections, enhanced streetscapes and storefronts, and will be connected to CSUF by pedestrian -friendly modifications along Nutwood Avenue.
The project is being contemplated as a joint planning effort by the City of Fullerton, Cal State Fullerton, and Hope International University. During Stage 1, Fehr & Peers assisted in transportation assessment of the plan area, refining the on -site transportation amenities and services, preparing a shared parking analysis, an evaluation of the future transit service in the study area, and an overall strategy for the plan area. During Stage 2, we completed the transportation impact assessment for the EIR.
A-43
{ J Lmi. T
r�rrd ;tom;#WK 'k yw+o.� Ku* ;. 'W. -MLA 11vr .. „ _ I . . g r +; ounly lethij ,�. rr � leti ' + J . - r ,� r µ � , s' o i .. • a - y .. ti ��i L
i
+• ` fdondrra . r• - .• _ yLaxrad 9t • - - . ,.
Likk.0 ST
_ .' rc' MNti*Nltt t: i�o� aL 4r�I� { ]., z„ a�"sI:fel_ - •
J�. _+ a s Y ▪ _ f
lig
Fwtwcr1 PI r p j R v S .. f '- i � ¢• �r*o Yard[! ` ■ . • .... I N 4 •a 'mss' f r •
fix• -- -t ^ ".
ti
r
a LLWLJ LJJJJ _
C:rreq� Avc
Olaiw IT.
. I I I II --4-- 6•nope km
F A
H
Li rftr///f HEM
EMJ
IE MTL
111
1�1ti1
IIWJJJLHmnr
■ "w ! monINH IR-1 r111L ill"
it
ne MrMaErar CAW
I1a
•.,rc.'
e
..._._
•■1U•IMAM
.■ 4JLm■■li11
Arrow Hu
4fiva »5ih,a b1 y1 t r• -x.
^i * t�Si~11 L1iig1VOH K 7,1
I '• norm wan 'try K4 t1 "M1 %W14
ARROW HWY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN & EIR
Glendora, CA I MIG, Inc.
The City of Glendora's primary goal for the Arrow Highway Corridor Specific Plan is to transform and revitalize the Arrow Highway Corridor area within the city of Glendora and unincorporated Los Angeles County with a variety of land uses in an attractive environment that provides overall economic redevelopment and improved livability within the city. In order to help the City of Glendora achieve this goal, Fuscoe provided significant technical resources to ensure the proposed land uses are supported by appropriate infrastructure upgrades and services. In addition to the technical analyses, Fuscoe also provided El P support to help the City obtain all necessary entitlements.
CONTACT & STATUS
Lisa Brownfield, Director of Planning Services, 626.744.9872 Completed
F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G'
ir
tires 7'h .. _ ., •� i 1 .7 .k.i . .. .. _. - -
Los Cerrito -s
we,iands
LONG BEACH SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
Long Beach, CA I Placeworks for City of Long Beach
This project entailed preparation of land use updates for a 1,500 -acre portion of East Long Beach as well as a Specific Plan, a Program EIR and an amendment to the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP) and the Southeast Area Development and Improvement Plan (SEADIP) zoning district. Located south of CSU Long Beach, the area provides marina access to Alamitos Bay and is host to regional bikeway connections along the San Gabriel River, which provides ocean access. SEADIP is the last area of Long Beach that is not entirely built out and is characterized by undeveloped Los Cerritos wetlands parcels in varying degrees of degradation and several large under- utilized properties, particularly along Pacific Coast Hwy. Fuscoe participated in conducting community outreach, following State grant protocols to identify the community's key infrastructure concerns. The overall project encompassed refining and implementing the perspectives of multiple stakeholder groups, including property owners, businesses, residents and wetlands preservationists. This significant undertaking offered a unique opportunity to produce a land use and development code that creatively balanced responsible development with resource preservation. The final Specific Plan included customized land uses and development standards; identified locations for future development potential; expanded multi -modal transportation options; and incorporated proactive strategies to preserve wetlands and measures to maintain valuable natural resources.
CONTACT & STATUS
Karen Gulley, Placeworks 714.966.9220
Christopher Koontz, City of Long Beach 562.570.6288
Completed 2017
AWARDS
City of Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan
2021 Hard -Won Victories Award, APA Los Angeles Planning Awards 2027 Outstanding Planning Award, AEP Los Angeles Awards
F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G'
-41
-45
temainder for City Water Demand Increases
from Existing Conditions
+1,054,420 gpd
1AASK AV
Proposed Land Use Change
+1,262 DUs
-281,667 SF
Increase in Water Demands
from Existing Condtions
+115,949 gpd
HEIL AV
Huntington
Beach
MCFADDEN
Fountain
Valley
a
West Santa
Ana Boulevard
wE6,».INsT1 1 ---
/
•
•
•
r G
6EGER61POhZJµ18':
Z F
rA
Anaheim
est Santa
r Boulevard
South
Bristol
Street
Costa Mesa
A-46
Orang
,South Mai
STr et
5 Fwj
Dyer Ro
16 Increase in Water Demands
from Existing Conditions
+273,417 gpd
Grand
Ave/17th
Street
South Main
Street
F l
CymwDEN.Ay
I
55 Fwy/
Dyer Road
FOOTHILL
Tustin
Foothills
Proposed Land Use Change
+588 DUs
-739,316 SF
Increase in Water Demands
from Existing Conditions
-3,653 gpd
Tustin
9y O
2 I Proposed Land Use Change
CITY OF SANTA ANA
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Santa Ana, CA I Placeworks for City of Santa Ana
Proposed Improvements
• Groundwater well l mproverrent Proj
Q Groundwater Nkll lnprovement Proj
(In (Fly 2018/19 CIP)
■ Purrp Salon Irrproverrent Project
(Completed)
Pump Staton lnprovement Project
(In City 2018/19 CIP)
The City of Santa Ana required assistance with evaluation of its key infrastructure, including drainage, sewer, water and water quality, for consistency with the City's General Plan update, as well as help in identifying opportunities for sustainability and water conservation.
As a subconsultant to PlaceWorks, Fuscoe Engineering's stormwater management team provided these services
• Hydrology, Water Quality & Infrastructure Assessment
• Potable Water & Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure Assessment • General Plan Update Technical Report FA Revisions
CONTACT & STATUS
Kathy Swigert, 774.966.9220
Completed February2022
F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G'
Ar
acrgttesErtaaarber, coalcfpqo33daarrinetatieetrretaces
ific film a.bass
ANAHEIM CANYON SPECIFIC
URBAN GREENING PLAN
LOCATION Anaheim, CA I CLIENT MIG, Inc. for City of Anaheim The Anaheim Canyon Specific/Urban Greening Plan was prepared to create an economic development strategy for this 3,000 -acre, industrial -zoned district.
Working closely with City staff and award -winning planners, MIG, Inc., Fuscoe investigated area -wide circulation and infrastructure, stormwater management and operational aspects, such as solid waste handling and recycling. This research, along with several stakeholder group outreach sessions, led to the new Specific Plan/Urban Greening Plan, featuring:
Side streets designated and enhanced for bicycles/pedestrians, leaving arterials maximized for vehicles
Creative "neighborhood -level" stormwater management basins, relieving properties of expensive, area consuming compliance BMPs • Alternative standards to consider for LID buildout of sites • Green Street concepts aimed at stormwater cleansing, enhanced pedestrian experiences and environmental performance
The project was funded by a Sustainable Communities Planning Grant and has become a cornerstone for a city-wide "Urban Greening" plan.
STATUS Completed
CONTACT Pamela Galera, City of Anaheim 1714.765.4463
AWARDS APA California Orange Section, 2017 Comprehensive Planning Award u l I c i r c l e th inkin g® A-47
aaidcfbsech aEhEim edAirgadpcpceed �e4ikit v'
Smock Iederard SperHlr Pion
N 3 - ld.11n and T -- Pre d Land IAe
- •. rte*
BEACH BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN
LOCATIO Anaheim, CA Placeworks
The Beach Boulevard Specific Plan covers approximately 283 acres along a 1.5 - mile portion of Beach Boulevard -State Route 39 in Anaheim. The Specific Plan is a guide for the revitalization of the Beach Boulevard corridor and outlines future development/redevelopment within the corridor for new residential, retail, community gatherings, open space and other productive uses.
In coordination with Placeworks and the City of Anaheim, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc (FEI) evaluated the existing infrastructure systems, including drainage, water, sewer and regional infiltration BMPs as well as capacity assessments to determine the ability of existing systems to serve the proposed land uses. The analysis involved working closely with several departments within the City, including Public Works for drainage, water quality and sewer, and the Water Department for the water distribution system. FEI identified potential impacts to the proposed land uses and various ways to improve the infrastructure to match future demands on the system. FEI also helped identify sustainable objectives for the Specific Plan, including water conservation and reuse, and helped Placeworks develop a defensible EIR. All of the findings were assimilated into a technical infrastructure report to support the EIR and Specific Plan.
STATUS Completed October 2018
CONTACT Keith Linker, City of Anaheim 1 714.765.4141
William Halligan (now at Harris & Assoc.) 1949.655.3900 A-48
c i r c l e
th i n k i ng
Appendix
PlaceWorks' Proposed Agreement Changes
City of Placentia
Proposed Agreement Changes
6.8. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Consultant agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold free and harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers, at Consultant's sole expense, from and against any and all claims, liabilities, demands, actions, expenses, damages, suits or other legal proceedings brought against the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers to the extent arising out of or in any way connected with the negligent performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors' work undertaken pursuant to this Agreement including all negligent acts or omissions, willful misconduct or negligent conduct, whether active or passive, on the part of the Consultant, its employees and/or subcontractors. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall apply whenever any claim, action, complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers based upon the work performed by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable, and whether or not there is any evidence of fault or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its employees and/or its subcontractors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other indemnity provisions contained either in the City's specifications or Consultant's Proposal, which shall be of no force and effect.
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS A-49
PLACEWORKS TEAM PROCESS
Charrettes & Workshops
Stakeholder
Interviews
Research & Analyze
Original Data Files
Vision
Developer Roundtables
—
Collaborate
Mobile Outreach
Envision
PEOPLE
The PlaceWorks Team believes in collaboration and community engagement every step of the way —from the assessment of current conditions and needs, to exploration of opportunities for the future, to confirmation of preferred visions, development plans, and implementation strategies and codes.
The PlaceWorks Team works through multiple methods to include as many people as possible.
PLACEWORKS
Local Stakeholders
Review & Strategize
The Plan
• Plans
• Maps/Diagrams
• Graphics/Illustrations
• Tables/Charts
• Performance
Evaluations
PROCESS
The PlaceWorks Team is effective at completing projects on time and under budget.
We establish clear procedures and protocols to ensure
that the work and the program address objectives and
expected outcomes and coordinates with concurrent
client initiatives.
Websites, Social Media
Open Houses &
Public Hearings
Environmental
Clearance Document
PRODUCT
The PlaceWorks Team is dedicated to providing clients
with reliable and effective products. This means that
for deliverable work products we will provide the Client with electronic files for publications.
4 PlaceWorks - Santa Ana
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100, Santa Ana, CA 92707
714.966.9220
Additional Offices
Los Angeles I Inland Empire I Central Coast I Bay Area I Sacramento placeworks.com
El PLACEWORKS
COSTS: Placentia SP -5
Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
CITY OF PLACENTIA • DUE JULY 5, 2024 (SUBMITTED JULY 3, 2024)
NM MA 0.1
PLACENTIA CORPORATE' INTER
•.v
aHENRYSCHEW'
ID] PLACEWORKS
COSTS: Placentia SP -5 Corridor Plan and
Specific Plan Update
SUBMITTED TO:
CITY OF PLACENTIA
Department of Development Services
Joseph Lambert
Director of Development Services
401 East Chapman Avenue
Placentia CA 92870
714.993.8124 I [email protected]
SUBMITTED BY:
PLACEWORKS
Karen Gulley
Managing Principal, Design
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana CA 92707
714.966.9220 I [email protected]
WITH:
FEHR & PEERS
FUSCOE ENGINEERING
DUE JULY 5, 2024 (SUBMITTED JULY 3, 2024)
PLACEWORKS.COM
IN
i
%1
I
PLACEWORKS
COSTS
July 3, 2024
Joe Lambert, Director of Development Services
CITY OF PLACENTIA
Department of Development Services
401 East Chapman Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
Subject: COSTS for the SP -5 Corridor Plan, Specific Plan Update and associated CEQA Review Dear Mr. Lambert:
The cost information for the SP -5 Corridor Plan, Specific Plan, and associated environmental review are provided in this separate file per RFP instructions.Assumptions, fee schedules, and our detailed budgets are provided on the following pages.
We are happy to work with the City to talk through the options and find the best fit for what you would like to accomplish through this effort.
This proposal shall remain valid for 180 days from the date of submittal. As a Principal, Karen Gulley is authorized to bind the team to the contents of this submittal and to negotiate contracts on behalf of PlaceWorks.
Please contact either of us at 714.966.9220 or via email with any questions.
We look forward to your response.
Respectfully submitted,
PLACEWORKS
Suzann chwab AICP I Associate Principal Karen Gulley I ManaginPrincipal, Design x2323 I [email protected] x2347 I [email protected] 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 I Santa Ana, California 92707 I 714.966.9220 I PlaceWorks.com
COST AND PRICE
Assumptions
This cost estimate assumes:
• A 23 -month schedule.
• Approximately 4% rate increases averaged into the bill rate for 2025-2026. • Two options for approaching CEQA, Option A for an Addendum and Option B for a Subsequent EIR; only one option to be selected. We are happy to work with the city to talk through the options and find the best fit for what the City would like to accomplish through this effort. • The Market Analysis and several technical studies have been included as an optional task that could be omitted to make the project more cost effective.
Our team's fee schedules are shown on the following pages. The breakdown of our overall cost proposal including projected hours and percentage of each team member's time for both CEQA options are detailed after that.
Our estimated budgets including each task and reimbursable costs but excluding opitonal tasks, are $304,107 (CEQA Option A) and $439,435 (CEQA Option B).
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS V
Cost and Price
Fee Schedules
PlaceWorks - 2024 Fee Schedule
Staff Level
Hourly BiII Rate
Principal
$210—$335
Associate Principal
$195—$275
Senior Associate II
$170—$260
Senior Associate I
$160—$220
Associate II
$135—$190
Associate I
$125—$175
Project Planner
$105—$165
Planner
$90—$145
Graphics Specialist
$90—$155
Administrator
$145—$235
Clerical/Word Processing/Technical Editor
$45—$155
Intern
$80—$115
Subconsultants are billed at cost plus 10%. Mileage reimbursement is at the standard IRS -approved rate. Possible yearly increase of 5% on bill rates. 2024_Std FeeSch_01-09-24
Vi CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
LJ
Cost and Price
FEHR''PEERS
2023-2024
(July 2023 through June 2024)
Hourly Billing Rates
Classification Hourly Rate
Principal
Senior Associate
Associate
Senior Engineer/Planner
Engineer/Planner
Senior Engineering Technician
Senior Project Accountant
Senior Project Coordinator
Project Coordinator
Technician
Intern
$250.00 - $395.00
$215.00 - $310.00
$185.00 - $275.00
$160.00 - $235.00
$135.00 - $185.00
$150.00 - $225.00
$170.00 - $210.00
$130.00 - $190.00
$115.00 - $175.00
$130.00 - $170.00
$100.00 - $135.00
• Other Direct Costs / Reimbursable expenses are invoiced at cost plus 10% for handling.
• Personal auto mileage is reimbursed at the then current IRS approved rate (65.5 cents per mile as of Jan 2023).
• Voice & Data Communications (Telephone, fax, computer, e-mail, etc.) are invoiced at cost as a percentage of project labor.
Fehr & Peers reserves the right to change these rates at any time with or without advance notice.
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS Vii
rs FL0OE
ENGINEERING
2023-2024 RATE SCHEDULE
IRVINE
SAN DIEGO
ONTARIO
LOS ANGELES
CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE
President /Vice President / Principal / Sr. Project Manager / Dir. Of Geospatial / S260 Certified Photogrammetrist
Project Manager/Technical Manager/Sr. Land Surveyor $229 Assoc. Project Manager/Sr. Engineer/Sr. Designer/Sr. Stormwater Engineer/ Specialist
AT/Cloud Registration Specialist/ Land Surveyor/ Engineer II / Designer II Engineer I / Designer I / Project Scientist / GIS Analyst Sr. Survey Analyst/Sr. Mapping Analyst
GIS Coordinator / Data Scientist
Assoc. Engineer / Stormwater Engineer / Stormwater Tech. / Plan Processor Geospatial Specialist / Survey Analyst / Mapping Analyst Stormwater Inspector
3D Artist / Survey Technician
Image Technician
Information Coordinator
1 -Man Survey Crew
2 -Man Survey Crew
3 -Man Survey Crew
$208
$190
$184
$175
$165
$152
$150
$130
$125
$110
$105
$217
$340
$433
1. Reproduction and other reimbursable expenses (such as overnight deliveries, mileage, permits, and licenses, etc.) and Client approved subcontractor services will be billed in addition to the above rates with a 10% handling surcharge.
2. This rate schedule is subject to change on an annual basis due to the granting of wage increases and/or other employer benefits to field or office employees during the lifetime of this agreement and Client approved change orders.
3. Overtime is available for critical deadlines at 1-1/2 times the normal rates for office employees.
Surveyors' rates are also adjusted automatically for overtime or holiday/weekend work in agreement with the Operating Engineers Union.
Client Initials
Effective through August 31, 2024
15535 Sand Canyon, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92618 I 949.4741960 fuscoe.com
Cost and Price
The PlaceWorks Team
SP -5 Corridor Plan & Specific Plan Update with CEQA Compliance COST PROPOSAL - CEQA Addendum Option A
Title
Role:
PLACEWORKS
Place-
Works
Hours
Place -
Works
2% Office
Expenses
PLACE-
WORKS
TOTAL
SUBCONSULTANTS
10%
Subconsultant
Markup
SUBCONSULTANT
TOTAL
TOTAL
TASK
BUDGET
GULLEY
Managing
Principal,
Principal -in-
Charge
SCHWAB
Associate
Principal
Project
Manager
SO
Associate
Assistant
ProjMgr
DIPIERRO
Project
Planner,
GIS
GUNNELLS
Chief
Economist
Market
Analysist
DURAND
Associate
Principal
CEQA
Principal
MROSLA
Associate
CEQA
PM
CASTRO
Planner
CEQA
Planner
VERMILION
Principal,
Tech Svcs
Tech Svcs
QA/QC
SHIELDS
Senior
Associate
Noise
Lead
CISNEROS
Associate
Noise
PARKS
Senior
Associate
AQ, GHG,
Energy Lead
EL CHAMMAS
Senior Engineer
Water
Quality/Supply
CEQA
Graphics
Technical
Editing
WP/
Clerical
Fehr & Peers
Mobility,
Traffic
Fuscoe
Civil
Engineering,
Infrastructure
Hourly Rate:
$285
$245
$175
$150
$275
$260
$190
$135
$275
$255
$155
$200
$235
$115
$150
$135
TASK 1. Kick-off and Project Management
1.1 Kick-off Meeting/ Background Review & Goals 4
6 12
8 30
$118
$6,028
2,000
0 $200
$2,200 $8,228
1.2 Existing Conditions Analysis (Story Map)
4 16
16 36
$124
$6,304
0 0 $0
$0 $6,304
1.3 Project Meetings and Communication
64 42
106
$461
$23,491
0 0 $0
$0 $23,491
TASK 1. SUBTOTAL 4
74 70
24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 172
$703
$35,823
$2,000
$0 $200
$2,200 $38,023
TASK 2. Community Engagement
Ir
•
-
2.1 Community -wide Workshop(s) - 2 2
32 48
20 102
$396
$20,206
4,000
0 $400
$4,400
$24,606
2.2 Webpage and Other On-line Content
8 20
28 $109
$5,569
0 0
$0
$0
$5,569
TASK 2. SUBTOTAL 2
40 68
20 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 130
$505
$25,775
$4,000
$0
$400
$4,400
$30,175
TASK 3. Identify & Prioritize Options/Develop the Plan
3.1 Site Testing 2
4 20
26 $101
$5,151
0 0
$0 $0
$5,151
3.2 Finalize Boundary
4 8
2 14
$54
$2,734
0 0
$0 $0
$2,734
3.3 Land Use Plan and Buildout Summary 4
20 16
4 44
$189
$9,629
0 0
$0 $0
$9,629
3.4 Land Use Designations and Permitted Uses 2
8 12
22 $93
$4,723
0 0
$0 $0
$4,723
3.5 Update and Draft Development and Design Standards 2 20 20
2 44
$185
$9,455
0 0
$0 $0
$9,455
3.6 Administrative Review Draft Plan 2
8 24
10 4
2 50
$182
$9,282
18,000
0 $1,800 $19,800
$29,082
3.7 Hearing Draft/ Final Plan 2
8 16
8 2
2 38
$142
$7,242
0 0
$0 $0
$7,242
TASK 3. SUBTOTAL 14
72 116
24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
4 238
$946
$48,216
$18,000
$0
$1,800 $19,800
$68,016
TASK 4. Study Session and Public Hearing
4.1 City Council Study Session
2 8
8 18
$79
$4,009
0 0
$0
$0
$4,009
4.2 City Council Adoption Hearing
2 8
4 14
$65
$3,295
0 0
$0
$0
$3,295
TASK 4. SUBTOTAL
4 16
12 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 32
$144 $7,304
$0
$0
$0
$0 $7,304
Optional Market Analysis
Market Anal sis
----
68 ---------
4 4 76
$397 $20,237 ----
$20,237
TASK 5. CEQA Review
5.1A Project Initiation
5.1.1 Project Initiation/Kick-Off Meeting
1 4
5 $20
$1,040
$0
$0
$1,040
5.1.2 Project Description
4 8
20 8
40 $124
$6,304
$0
$0
$6,304
Task 5.1.A Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 5
12 20
0 0
0 0
0 8
0 0
45 $144
$7,344
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,344
5.2A Administrative Draft CEQA Document
Administrative Draft
8 75
132
4 16
4 239
$751
$38,301
$0
$0
$38,301
Task 5.2.A Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 8
75 132
0 0
0 0
0 4
16 4
239
$751
$38,301
$0
$0
$0
$0
$38,301
5.3A Screencheck Draft of CEQA Document
Prepare Screencheck Draft
1 12
16 4
33 $103
$5,263
$0
$0
$5,263
Task 5.3.A Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 1
12 16
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 0
33 $103
$5,263
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,263
5.4A Public Draft CEQA Document
5.4.1 Prepare Printcheck Draft
4 8
4 10
26 $87
$4,457
$0
$0
$4,457
5.4.2 Prepare Public Draft
2 5
7 $29
$1,499
$0
$0
$1,499
NOA, NOC, Summary Form and Filing (Not Applicable)
0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
NOA Distribution Support (50 mailings) (Not Applicable) 0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Task 5.4.A Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 6
13 0
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 10
33 $117
$5,957
0 0
0 0
$5,957
5.5A Final CEQA Document (Not Applicable)
5.6A Approval Documents
MMRP
1 2
5 8
$26
$1,341
$0
$0
$1,341
MMRP (2nd Draft)
1 2
3 $13
$653
$0
$0
$653
NOD
1 2
3 $13
$653
$0
$0
$653
NOD (2nd Draft)
1 1
$4
$194
$0
$0
$194
Filing Coord/Time
1 4
5 $20
$1,040
$0
$0
$1,040
Task 5.6.A Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 4
11 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
20 $76
$3,881
0 0
$0
$0
$3,881
5.7A Project Meetings, Management, and Coordination
Project Meetings, Management, and Coordination (Assumption is 1hr/month for PIC and 4hrs/month for PM for 6 months) 4 24
28 $112
$5,712
$0
$0
$5,712
6 Virtual Meetings
6 6
12 $54
$2,754
$0
$0
$2,754
Task 5.7.A Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 10
30 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
40 $166
$8,466
0 0
$0
$0
$8,466
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS iX
Cost and Price
The PlaceWorks Team
SP -5 Corridor Plan & Specific Plan Update with CEQA Compliance COST PROPOSAL - CEQA Addendum Option A
Title
Role:
PLACEWORKS
Place-
Works
Hours
Place -
Works
2% Office
Expenses
PLACE-
WORKS
TOTAL
SUBCONSULTANTS
10%
Subconsultant
Markup
SUBCONSULTANT
TOTAL
TOTAL
TASK
BUDGET
GULLEY
Managing
Principal,
Principal -in-
Charge
SCHWAB
Associate
Principal
Project
Manager
SO
Associate
Assistant
ProjMgr
DIPIERRO
Project
Planner,
GIS
GUNNELLS
Chief
Economist
Market
Analysist
DURAND
Associate
Principal
CEQA
Principal
MROSLA
Associate
CEQA
PM
CASTRO
Planner
CEQA
Planner
VERMILION
Principal,
Tech Svcs
Tech Svcs
QA/QC
SHIELDS
Senior
Associate
Noise
Lead
CISNEROS
Associate
Noise
PARKS
Senior
Associate
AQ, GHG,
Energy Lead
EL CHAMMAS
Senior Engineer
Water
Quality/Supply
CEQA
Graphics
Technical
Editing
WP/
Clerical
Fehr & Peers
Mobility,
Traffic
Fuscoe
Civil
Engineering,
Infrastructure
Hourly Rate:
$285
$245
$175
$150
$275
$260
$190
$135
$275
$255
$155
$200
$235
$115
$150
$135
5.8A CEQA Hearing Attendance
Attend Hearings
16 24 4
44 $185
$9,445
$0
$0
$9,445
Task 5.8.A Subtotal
0 0 0 0 0 16
24 4
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 44
$185
$9,445
$0
$0
$9,445
TASK 5. SUBTOTAL
0 0 0 0 0 50
177 177
0 0 0
0 0 20 16
14 454
$1,542
$78,657
$0
$0
$0
$0
$78,657
T SK .. TECHNICAL AN LVSIS
6.1 Air Quality, GHG, and Energy Analysis
14 60
74 $317
$16,167
$0
0 $0
$0
$16,167
6.2 Noise and Vibration Analysis
9 42
51 $176
$8,981
$0
0 $0
$0
$8,981
6.3 Tribal Consultation Support (Not Applicable to Addendum) 0 $0
$0
$0
0 $0
$0
$0
6.4 Water Supply Assessment- Optional
50 50
$235
$11,985
$0
0 $0
$0
$11,985
6.5 Transportation Impact Study
0 $0
$0
$0
0 $0
$0
$0
6.5.1 Mobility Analysis & Transportation Metric For CEQA Analysis $12,000
0 $1,200
$13,200
$13,200
6.5.2 Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Assessment for CEQA $6,000
0 $600
$6,600
$6,600
6.5.3 Transportation Impact Analysis -Optional
0 $0
$0
$18,000
0 $1,800
$19,800
$19,800
6.5.4 Level of Service Traffic Study - Optional
0 $0
$0
$30,000
0 $3,000
$33,000
$33,000
6.6 Infrastructure Report
0 $0
$0
$0
29,650
$2,965
$32,615
$32,615
TASK 6.SUBTOTAL -WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
14 9
42 60
0 0
0 0
125
$493
$25,148 $18,000
$29,650
$4,765
$52,415
$77,563
TASK 6. SUBTOTAL - WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
14 9
42 60
50 0
0 0
175
$728
$37,133 $66,000
$29,650
$9,565
$105,215
$142,348
LABOR HOURS TOTAL- WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS
24 202
266
68 0
50 177
177
14 9
42 0
0 20
24 18
1091
LABOR HOURS TOTAL - WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
24 202
266
68 68
50 177
177
14 9
42 60
50 20
28 22
1167
LABOR DOLLAR TOTALS - WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS
$6,840
$49,490
$46,550
$10,200
$0
$13,000
$33,630
$23,895
$3,850
$2,295
$6,510
$0
$0
$2,300
$3,600
$2,430
1091
$4,333
$220,923
$42,000 $29,650
$78,815
$299,738
LABOR DOLLARS TOTAL - WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
$6,840
$49,490
$46,550
$10,200
$18,700
$13,000
$33,630
$23,895
$3,850
$Z295
$6,510
$12,000
$11,750
$2,300
$3,600
$Z430
1091
$4,568
$253,145
$90,000 $29,650
$131,615
$384,760
PlaceWorks Percent of Total Labor Without Optional Tasks
2.2%
18.5%
24.4%
6.2%
0.0%
4.6%
16.2%
16.2%
1.3%
0.8%
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
2.2%
1.6%
100.0%
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
PlaceWorks Reimbursable Expenses
$4,369
Subconsultants' Reimbursable Expenses
$0
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES TOTAL
$4,369
GRAND TOTAL WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS
$304,107
GRAND TOTAL WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
$389,129
X CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
Cost and Price
The PlaceWorks Team
SP -5 Corridor Plan & Specific Plan Update with CEQA Compliance COST PROPOSAL - CEQA SEIR Option B
Title
Role:
PLACEWORKS
Place-
Works
Hours
Place -
Works
2% Office
Expenses
PLACE-
WORKS
TOTAL
SUBCONSULTANTS
10%
Subconsultant
Markup
SUBCONSULTANT
TOTAL
TOTAL
TASK
BUDGET
GULLEY
Managing
Principal,
Design
Principal -in-
Charge
SCHWAB
Associate
Principal
Project
Manager
SO
Associate
Assistant
ProjMgr
DiPIERRO GUNNELLS
Project Chief
Planner, Economist
GIS
GIS Market
Analysis
DURAND
Associate
Principal
CEQA
Principal
MROSLA
Associate
CEQA
Project
CASTRO
Planner
CEQA
Planner
VERMILION
Principal,
Tech Svcs
Tech Svcs
QA/QC
SHIELDS
Senior
Associate
Noise
Lead
CISNEROS
Associate
Noise
PARKS
Senior
Associate
AQ, GHG,
Energy Lead
ELCHAMMAS
Senior Engineer
Water
Quality/Supply
CEQA
Graphics
Technical
Editing
WP/
Clerical
Fehr & Peers
Mobility,
Traffic
Fuscoe
Civil
Engineering,
Infrastructure
Hourly Rate:
$285
$245
$175
$150 $275
$260
$190
$135
$275
$255
$155
$200
$235
$115
$150
$135
TASK 1. Kick-off and Project Management
1.1 Kick-off Meeting/ Background Review & Goals
4 6
12 8
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 30
$118
$6,028
$2,000
0 $200
$2,200
$8,228
1.2 Existing Conditions Analysis (Story Map)
0 4
16 16
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 36
$124
$6,304
0 0
$0
$0
$6,304
1.3 Project Meetings and Communication
8 48
32 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 88
$393
$20,033
0 0
$0
$0
$20,033
TASK 1. SUBTOTAL
4 74
70 24
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1541
$635
$32,365
$2,000
0 $200
$2,200
$38,023
TASK 2. Community Engagement
2.1 Community -wide Workshop(s) - 2
2 32
48 20
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 102
$396
$20,206
$4,000
0 $400
$4,400
$24,606
2.2 Webpage and Other On-line Content
0 8
20 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 28
$109
$5,569
0 0
$0
$0
$5,569
TASK 2. SUBTOTAL
2 40
68 20
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
130
$505
$25,775
$4,000
$0
$400
$4,400
$30,175
TASK 3. Identify & Prioritize Options/Develop the Plan
3.1 Site Testing
2 4
20 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 26
$101
$5,151
0 0
$0
$0
$5,151
3.2 Finalize Boundary
0 4
8 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 14
$54
$2,734
0 0
$0
$0
$2,734
3.3 Land Use Plan and Buildout Summary
4 20
16 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 44
$189
$9,629
0 0
$0
$0
$9,629
3.4 Land Use Designations and Permitted Uses
2 8
12 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 22
$93
$4,723
0 0
$0
$0
$4,723
3.5 Update and Draft Development and Design Standards
2 20
20 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 44
$185
$9,455
0 0
$0
$0
$9,455
3.6 Administrative Review Draft Plan
2 8
24 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 4
2 50
$182
$9,282
18,000
0 $1,800
$19,800
$29,082
3.7 Hearing Draft/ Final Plan
2 8
16 8
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
2 38
$142
$7,242
0 0
$0
$0
$7,242
TASK 3. SUBTOTAL
14 72
116
24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
4 238
$946
$48,216
$18,000
$0
$1,800
$19,800
$68,016
TASK •. Study sessi.n -n. •u.lic H•.rin _•
4.1 City Council Study Session
2 12
16 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 30
$126
$6,436
0 0
$0
$0
$6,436
4.2 City Council Adoption Hearing
2 12
16 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 30
$126
$6,436
0 0
$0
$0
$6,436
TASK 4. SUBTOTAL
4 24
32 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 60
$252 $12,872 $0
$0
$0
$0 $12,872
OPTIONAL MARKET ASSESSMENT
Market Assessment
68 4
4 68
$397
$20,237
$20,237
TASK 5. CEQA Review
5.1B Project Initiation
5.1.1 Project Initiation/Kick-Off Meeting
1 4
5 $20
$1,040
$o
$o
$1,040
5.1.2 Project Description
4 8
20 8
40 $124
$6,304
$0
$0
$6,304
Task 5.1.B Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 5
12 20
0 0
0 0
0 8
0 0
45 $144
$7,344
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,344
5.2B Administrative Draft CEQA Document
5.2.1 NOP (and filing)
1 6
8 4
4 23 $71
$3,611
$0
$o
$3,611
NOP Distribution Coord. (50 mailings)
4 4 $15
$775
$o
$0
$775
5.2.2 Scoping Meeting (Attendance and Materials)
4 16
8 4
4 36 $126
$6,426
$0
$0
$6,426
5.2.3 Administrative Draft SEIR
24 166
316
16 45
567 $1,781
$90,811
$o
$o
$90,811
Task 5.2.B Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 29
192
332
0 0
0 0
0 20
53 4
630 $1,993
$101,623
$0
$0
$0
$0
$101,623
5.3B Screencheck Draft of CEQA Document
Prepare Screencheck Draft
4 34
50 8
96 $303
$15,473
$0
$0
$15,473
Task 5.3.B Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 4
34 50
0 0
0 0
0 8
0 0
96 $303
$15,473
$0
$0
$0
$o
$15,473
5.4B Public Draft CEQA Document
5.4.1 Prepare Printcheck Draft
8 20
4 16
48 $170
$8,670
$0
$o
$8,670
5.4.2 Prepare Public Draft
4 16
20 $82
$4,162
$0
$0
$4,162
NOA, NOC, Summary Form and Filing
1 4
8 13 $42
$2,142
$o
$o
$2,142
NOA Distribution Support (50 mailings)
4 4 $15
$775
$0
$0
$775
Task 5.4.6 Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 13
44 8
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 16
85 $309
$15,749
$o
$0
0 0
$15,749
5.5B Final CEQA Document
Admin Draft FEIR (10 Comment Letters)
8 16
20 8
8 8
68 $220
$11,240
$0
$0
$11,240
Printcheck Draft FEIR
14 14
$53
$2,713
$0
$0
$2,713
Public Review Draft FEIR
8 8
$30
$1,550
$0
$0
$1,550
Task 5.5.B Subtotal
0 0
0 0 0
8 38
20 0 0 0 0 0
8 8
8 90
$303
$15,503
$0
$0
$0
$0
$15,503
Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS Xi
Cost and Price
The PlaceWorks Team
SP -5 Corridor Plan & Specific Plan Update with CEQA Compliance COST PROPOSAL - CEQA SEIR Option B
Title
Role:
PLACEWORKS
Place -
Place- Works
Works 2% Office
Hours Expenses
PLACE-
WORKS
TOTAL
SUBCONSULTANTS
10%
Subconsultant
Markup
SUBCONSULTANT
TOTAL
TOTAL
TASK
BUDGET
GULLEY
Managing
Principal,
Desien
Principal -in-
Charge
SCHWAB
Associate
Principal
Project
Manager
SO
Associate
Assistant
Proj Mgr
DiPIERRO
Project
Planner,
GIS
GIS
GUNNELLS
Chief
Economist
Market
Analysis
DURAND
Associate
Principal
CEQA
Principal
MROSLA
Associate
CEQA
Project
CASTRO
Planner
CEQA
Planner
VERMILION
Principal,
Tech Svcs
Tech Svcs
QA/QC
SHIELDS
Senior
Associate
Noise
Lead
CISNEROS
Associate
Noise
PARKS
Senior
Associate
AQ, GHG,
Energy Lead
ELCHAMMAS
Senior Engineer
Water
Quality/Supply
CEQA
Graphics
Technical
Editing
WP/
Clerical
Fehr & Peers
Mobility,
Traffic
Fuscoe
Civil
Engineering,
Infrastructure
Hourly Rate:
$285
$245
$175
$150
$275
$260
$190
$135
$275
$255
$155
$200
$235
$115
$150
$135
5.6B Approval Documents
MMRP
1 2
5 8
$26
$1,341
$0
$0
$1,341
MMRP (2nd Draft)
1 2
3 $13
$653
$0
$0
$653
NOD
1 2
3 $13
$653
$0
$0
$653
FOF/SOC
4 16
24 8
2 54
$176
$8,966
$0
$0
$8,966
FOF/SOC (2nd Draft)
4 8
12 $51
$2,611
$0
$0
$2,611
Filing Coord/Time
1 4
5 $20
$1,040
$0
$0
$1,040
Task 5.6.B Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 12
34 29
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 2
85 $299
$15,264
0 0
$0
$0
$15,264
5.7B Project Meetings, Management, and Coordination
Project Meetings, Management, and Coordination (Assumption is lhr/month for PIC and 4hrs/month for PM for 12 months) 12 48
60 $245
$12,485
$0
$0
$12,485
12 Virtual Meetings
12 12
24 $108
$5,508
$0
$0
$5,508
Task 5.7.B Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 24
60 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
84 $353
$17,993
0 0
$0
$0
$17,993
5.8B CEQA Hearing Attendance
Attend Hearings
16 24
4 44 $185
$9,445
$0
$0
$9,445
Task 5.8.6 Subtotal
0 0
0 0
0 16
24 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
44 $185
$9,445
$0
$0
$9,445
TASK 5. SUBTOTAL
0 0
0 0
0 103
400
443
0 0
0 0
0 40
61 22
1069 $3,586
$198,394
$0
$0
$0
$0
$198,394
TASK •. TECHNIC • • NALYSIS
6.1 Air Quality, GHG, and Energy Analysis
24 90
114 $492
$25,092
0 0
$0
$0
$25,092
6.2 Noise and Vibration Analysis
9 54
63 $213
$10,878
0 0
$0
$0
$10,878
6.3 Tribal Consultation Support
1 2
8 11 $34
$1,754
0 0
$0
$0
$1,754
6.4 Water Supply Assessment- Optional
50 50 $235
$11,985
0 0
$0
$0
$11,985
6.5 Transportation Impact Study
0 0
0 $0
0 $0
$0
$0
Mobility Analysis & Transportation Metric For CEQA Analysis
6.5.1 0
0 0
$12,000
$0
$1,200
$13,200
$13,200
6.5.2 Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Assessment for CEQA 0 0
0 $6,000
$0
$600
$6,600
$6,600
6.5.3 Transportation Impact Analysis - Optional
0 0
0 $18,000
0 $1,800
$19,800
$19,800
6.5.4 Level of Service Traffic Study - Optional
0 0
0 $30,000
0 $3,000
$33,000
$33,000
6.6 Infrastructure Report
0 $0
$0
$0
29,650
$2,965
$32,615
$32,615
TASK 6. SUBTOTAL - WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS
0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 24 9 54 90 0 0 0 0
188 $739
$37,724
$18,000
$29,650
$4,765
$52,415
$90,139
TASK 6. SUBTOTAL - WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 24 9 54 90 50 0 0 0
238 $974
$49,709
$66,000
$29,650
$9,565
$105,215
$154,924
LABOR HOURS TOTAL - WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS
24 210
286
68 0
104
402
451
24 9
54 90
0 40
69 26
1857
LABOR HOURS TOTAL- WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
24 210
286
68 68
104
402
451
24 9
54 90
50 40
69 26
1975
LABOR DOLLAR TOTALS - WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS
$6,840
$51,450
$50,050
$10,200
$0
$27,040
$76,380
$60,885
$6,600
$2,295
$8,370
$18,000
$0
$4,600
$10,350
$3,510
$6,663
$355,346
$42,000 $29,650
$78,815
$434,161
LABOR DOLLARS TOTAL - WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
$6,840
$51,450
$50,050
$10,200
$18,700
$27,040
$76,380
$60,885
$6,600
$2,295
$8,370
$18,000
$11,750
$4,600
$10,350
$3,510
1975 $7,295
$387,568
$90,000 $29,650
- - - - $131,615
$519,183
PlaceWorks Percent of Total Labor
1%
11%
14%
3%
3%
5%
20%
23%
1%
0%
3%
5%
3%
2%
3%
1% 100%,
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
PlaceWorks Reimbursable Expenses
Subconsultants' Reimbursable Expenses
EXPENSES TOTAL
$5,274
$0
$5,274
GRAND TOTAL WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS
GRAND TOTAL WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
$439,435
$524,457
Xii CITY OF PLACENTIA • SP -5 Corridor Plan and Specific Plan Update
4 PlaceWorks - Santa Ana
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100, Santa Ana, CA 92707
714.966.9220
Additional Offices
Los Angeles I Inland Empire I Central Coast I Bay Area I Sacramento placeworks.com
EXHIBIT B
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
A. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
City reserves the right to review any and all of the required insurance policies and/or endorsements, but has no obligation to do so. Failure to demand evidence of full compliance with the insurance requirements set forth in this Agreement or failure to identify any insurance deficiency shall not relieve Consultant from, nor be construed or deemed a waiver of, its obligation to maintain the required insurance at all times during the performance, including any extension thereof, of this Agreement.
Consultant shall obtain, maintain, and keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement, including any extension thereof, all of the following minimum scope of insurance coverages:
1. Commercial General Liability Insurance
Broad -form commercial general liability, with coverage at least as broad as the most current version of ISO Commercial General Liability coverage form CG 00 01, in a form at least as broad as ISO form CG 00 01 04 13, and shall include insurance for premises and operations, products/completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily injury, and personal and advertising injury with a policy limit of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence and Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000.00) general aggregate. The aggregate limit, encompassing the above coverage, shall apply separately to this project/location. If Consultant maintains higher limits than the specified minimum limits, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant.
2. Business Automobile Liability Insurance
Business automobile liability for all owned, hired, leased, and non -owned vehicles at least as broad as the most current version of ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01, with a policy limit of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) combined single limit per accident. If Consultant maintains higher limits than the specified minimum limits, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant.
3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance Workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per accident for any employee or employees of Consultant. Consultant agrees to waive and to obtain endorsements from its workers' compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers' compensation insurance policy against the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise under their workers' compensation insurance policies.
By signing this Agreement, the Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the following:
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.
The Consultant shall also comply with Section 3800 of the Labor Code by securing, paying for, and maintaining in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, complete workers' compensation insurance, and shall furnish a certificate of insurance to the Project Manager before execution of this Agreement by the City. The City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers shall not be responsible for any claims in law or equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this Section.
4. Professional Errors and Omissions ("E&O") Liability Insurance Professional errors and omissions ("E&O") liability insurance on an occurrence based policy with policy limits of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence and Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.00) policy aggregate. Architects' and engineers' coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. The retroactive date must be shown, and this date must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least three (3) years after completion of the contract of work. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase "extended reporting coverage" for a minimum of three (3) years after completion of contract work. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the Project Manager for review. If Consultant maintains higher limits than the specified minimum limits, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant.
5. Standards for Insurance Comaanies
All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commission to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders' rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide.
B. Documentation and Other Provisions
1. The commercial general liability insurance policy and business automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to contain the following: The City of Placentia, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied, or used by the Consultant; and automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the Consultant. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor's insurance at least as broad as one of the following ISO ongoing operations forms: CG 20 10 or CG 20 26 or CG 20 33 (not allowed from
subcontractors), or CG 20 38; and one of the following ISO completed operations forms:
CG 20 37, 2039 (not allowed from subcontractors), or CG 20 40.
2. Said policies shall not terminate, nor shall they be cancelled or coverage reduced, without at least thirty (30) days' written notice to the City. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, Consultant shall forthwith obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance. Should Consultant fail to immediately procure other insurance, as specified, to substitute for any cancelled policy or reduction in the required coverage limits, the City may procure such insurance at Consultant's sole cost and expense.
3. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Placentia, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers. Any other insurance maintained by the City of Placentia shall be excess and not contributing with the insurance provided by this policy.
4. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Placentia, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers.
5. Defense fees and costs shall not deplete the limits of any insurance provided under this Agreement.
6. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
7. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure the City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.
8. Consultant agrees to waive, and to obtain endorsements from insurers waiving, subrogation rights against the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise under their insurance policies.
9. Coverage shall be on a standard occurrence form. Claims -made forms are not acceptable. Modified, limited, or restricted occurrence forms are not acceptable.
/
A� o® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
07/01/2024
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER
Marsh Risk & Insurance Services
17901 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1100
(949) 399-5800; License #0437153
Irvine, CA 92614
Attn: [email protected]/F: 212-948-4323 CN115158923--01-24-25
CONTACT
NAME:
PHONE FAX(A/C,
(AIC, No, Ext): (A/C, No):
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
NAIC #
INSURER A : Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co
44520
INSURED
PlaceWorks, Inc
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, CA 92707
INSURER B : Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America
25674
INSURER C : N/A
N/A
INSURER D :
INSURER E :
INSURER F :
COVERAGES
CERTIFICATE NUMBER:
LOS -002640527-04
REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
LTR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
ADDL
INSD
SUBR
WVD
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFF
(MM/DD/YYYYI
POLICY EXP
(MM/DDIYYYYI
LIMITS
A
X
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
EPK148300
07/01/2024
07/01/2025
EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 5,000,000
CLAIMS -MADE
X
OCCUR
DAMAGE RETED
PREMISESO(Ea occurrence)
$ 100,000
X
BI & PD Ded. $5,000
MED EXP (Any one person)
$ 10,000
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$ 5,000,000
GEN'L
X
AGGREGATE
POLICY
OTHER:
LIMIT APPLIES
PRO-
JECT
PER:
LOC
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$ 5,000,000
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$ 5,000,000
Contractors Pollution
$ 5,000,000
B
AUTOMOBILE
X
LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
OWNED
SCHEDULED
AUTOS
NON -OWNED
AUTOS ONLY
BA-1N96406A-24-43-G
07/01/2024
07/01/2025
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
$ 1,000,000
BODILY INJURY (Per person)
$
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
$
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
$
Comp/Coll Deductibles
$ 1,000
UMBRELLA LIAB
EXCESS LIAB
OCCUR
CLAIMS -MADE
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
AGGREGATE
$
DED
RETENTION $
$
B
WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBEREXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
Y/N
N
NIA
UB-7K728676-24-43-G
07/01/2024
07/01/2025
X
STATUTE
EERH
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$ 1,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
$ 1,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
$ 1,000,000
A
Errors & Omissions -Claims Made
Retro Dates: See 2nd Page
EPK148300
07/01/2024
07/01/2025
Each Claim/Aggregate
5,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Re: Liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the Consultant.
The City of Placentia and its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are included as additional insured where required by written contract with respect to General Liability and Auto Liability.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELLATION
City of Placentia
401 E. Chapman Ave
Placentia, CA 92870
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
wievra Red & %Kaunaoue Senaeeee
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2016 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: CN115158923
LOC #: Irvine
ACORO�
ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE