Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Pleasant Hill City Council
March 2, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
March 2, 2026
Body
Pleasant Hill City Council
Pages
171
Original file
19.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-pleasanthillca.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

Task 4: Assessment Engineering and Engineer’s Reports. This task involves developing the final assessment methodology, determining the specific proposed assessment for each parcel, preparing the Engineer’s Reports, and finalizing the assessment measures and messaging plans for each.

Task 5: Non-Advocacy Property-Owner Informational Outreach Services. To ensure a successful outcome, we will advise and support the City with non-advocacy informational outreach before and during the ballot proceeding, providing the public with clear and accurate information about the proposed assessment measures.

Task 6: Proposition 218 Ballot Proceeding Services. We will assist and fully support the City with the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings. This includes preparing all necessary resolutions, designing, mailing, and tabulating official notices and assessment ballots, as well as conducting the public ballot tabulations.

We look forward to this opportunity to assist the City with this important project and stand ready to proceed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at 707-430-4300 and [email protected]. Melanie Lee can be reached at 707-430-4300 ext. 120 and [email protected]
Sincerely,
John W. Bliss, P.E., President
SCI Consulting Group
cc: Melanie Lee, SCI Consulting Group
Heather Jamison, SCI Consulting Group
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 114 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 3 of 12 ends

WORK PLAN AND APPROACH
SCI proposes a phased, collaborative approach that moves from an early understanding of the 2024 outcome through assessment engineering to final Proposition 218 balloting. Each task builds on the prior task, ensuring a consistent progression that integrates discovery, technical analysis, and factual informational outreach. Our process is designed to reduce demands on City staff while providing legally defensible work products that meet all requirements of Proposition 218.

TASK 1: DISCOVERY AND ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Before moving toward a future Proposition 218 effort, the City will benefit from a clear and objective understanding of the factors that affected the 2024 ballot outcome and the current perspectives of property owners in AD No. 20 and AD No. 22. This diagnostic phase establishes the factual foundation needed to guide assessment structure development and future informational outreach.

SCI will analyze 2024 ballot return patterns and participation rates, including zone level voting results and turnout trends. Staff will also review protest letters, correspondence, meeting notes, and prior informational materials to identify the themes, concerns, and informational gaps that may have influenced the prior result. In addition, SCI will perform a preliminary review of past informational messaging to evaluate clarity, identify areas for refinement, and determine which topics may require enhanced explanation for property owners.

Findings from Task 1 will directly inform the outreach preparation in Task 2 and the preliminary engineering work in Task 3.TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Information and data request list
▪ Project kickoff meeting (Virtual)
▪ Project timeline
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ 15–20 stakeholder interviews with property owners, HOA representatives, and business leaders
▪ Obstacles and Opportunities Assessment Memorandum (MS Word / PDF) ▪ 2024 Assessment Outcome Analysis Memorandum (MS Word / PDF) ▪ Stakeholder Interview Summary (MS Word / PDF)
TASK 2: INFORMED OUTREACH PREPARATION
Task 2 builds on the diagnostic findings from Task 1 and focuses on developing the components of a factual, legally compliant informational outreach program for later use in a future Proposition 218 process. SCI will prepare an outreach strategy tailored to the characteristics of each district zone and the informational needs of the various groups of property owners. This will include zone specific approaches where additional clarification may be warranted, and dedicated informational guidance for condominium owners and recently added residential parcels.

As part of this preparation work, SCI will draft factual informational materials, design a digital survey to gather additional community input (if requested by the City), and prepare content for use on a project website or Local Input page. While Task 2 focuses on preparation, certain outreach activities Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 115 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 4 of 12 ends

included in the deliverables may be conducted during this phase as part of the City’s effort to ensure transparency and gather early feedback to shape the next Proposition 218 process. Full implementation of informational outreach supporting a ballot proceeding will occur later under Task 5, after preliminary assessment engineering is complete.

Local Input is an SCI platform that facilitates community 0engagement and fosters collaboration between local
government, voters, and key stakeholders. Through this
customizable online platform, Local Input enhances
transparency, community participation, and decision-making processes at the local level. This enables voters to become more informed, voice their opinions, contribute ideas, and share feedback regarding a proposed local funding measure.

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ Digital survey and summary of survey results (MS Word / PDF) ▪ Public informational meetings (two virtual; two in-person) ▪ Factual outreach materials, including FAQs, handouts, presentations, and email content (Word / PPT / PDF)
▪ Website or Local Input project page content
▪ Summary of outreach findings and key themes memorandum (MS Word / PDF) TASK 3: INITIAL PLANNING AND PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING Task 3 begins the technical assessment engineering work, informed by the findings from Tasks 1 and

2. SCI will analyze the proposed improvements and services, property ownership characteristics, and district boundaries to establish the framework for the proposed assessment measures. SCI will collect and review property data from the City, the County Assessor, and other sources to confirm parcel characteristics and eligibility. This preliminary engineering work will guide development of the assessment methodology and ensure consistency with the City’s objectives.

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ Assessment Measures Timeline
▪ Preliminary assessment engineering findings
TASK 4: ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING AND ENGINEER’S REPORTS (2) With the discovery, early outreach preparation, and preliminary engineering work complete, Task 4 develops the formal assessment methodology and prepares the Engineer’s Reports required under Proposition 218. The findings from Tasks 1 through 3 ensure that the assessment structure, data assumptions, and supporting documentation reflect the City’s objectives, the characteristics of benefiting parcels, and the information themes identified earlier in the project.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 116 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 5 of 12 ends

If the City proceeds with the formation of the assessment districts, SCI will develop multi-year revenue and expense projections based on City input. These projections will serve as the foundation for the budgets and cost estimates included in the Engineer’s Reports. Comprehensive assessment engineering work will involve defining the proportional assessment rate methodology and separating and quantifying both special and general benefits from the proposed improvements and services.

SCI will apply its industry-leading benefit assessment engineering expertise to develop a method that fully complies with the legal and procedural requirements for a new, post-Proposition 218 benefit assessment, including the court’s direction in Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority, Dahms v. City of Pomona, Greene v. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Robert Beutz v. County of Riverside, and other Proposition 218 decisions.

In a review session, SCI will present these fiscal plans, our data review and analysis, and the proposed assessment methodology, levies, and budgets to the City. Issues uncovered by the review will be highlighted, and remedies suggested. After the City and the City’s legal counsel have reviewed the data and information, SCI will prepare Engineer’s Reports that fully meet the requirements of Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”), the Government Code, and other relevant code sections.

The Engineer’s Reports will be prepared by John Bliss, P.E., an assessment engineer with 24 years of extensive assessment engineering experience. The Engineer’s Reports will include a detailed description of the assessment plans for the improvements and services, future capital and facility improvement needs, a detailed cost estimate, an analysis of special and general benefits, the rationale used for the assessment apportionment, the method of assessment apportionment, calculation of the specific proposed assessment amount for each parcel, an assessment diagram, and other elements.

After the Engineer’s Reports have been prepared, they will be reviewed with City staff and, if necessary, shall be revised to reflect any relevant comments or issues identified. SCI shall also finalize the assessment levies, roll, diagram, and other information for preliminary City approval. SCI will also prepare draft resolutions, notices, and other materials and documents required or recommended for the proposed assessment. Such documents shall be finalized in conjunction with the City’s legal counsel. At the culmination of these services, SCI shall present the findings, proposed assessment levies, and the Engineer’s Reports to the City staff and the City Council (“Council”).

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project Meeting (Virtual)
▪ Proposition 218-compliant Engineer’s Reports (PDF)
▪ Draft resolutions and associated agenda reports (MS Word) ▪ Presentation at City Council meeting (In-Person)
TASK 5: NON-ADVOCACY PROPERTY-OWNER INFORMATIONAL OUTREACH SERVICES Effective informational outreach is essential for a successful ballot outcome. Property owners need a clear understanding of the purpose, need, and structure of any proposed assessment measure before they can make an informed decision. When property owners receive straightforward, accessible information about what the measure would fund, why it is needed, and how it would Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 117 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 6 of 12 ends

affect them, they are far more likely to view the proposal with confidence. Conversely, limited information, unanswered questions, or general mistrust can lead to uncertainty and ultimately a no vote.

Under California law, the City may provide informational communications regarding City issues, including assessment measures, so long as those communications remain strictly factual and nonadvocacy. All materials must be objective and balanced, presenting the measure’s purpose, background, and impacts without attempting to influence the outcome.

Task 5 continues the outreach preparation completed in Task 2 and provides property owners with factual and accessible information about the proposed assessment measures during the Proposition 218 process. Task 5 services begin after completion of the preliminary Engineers Reports. SCI will work with the City to develop and implement an informational outreach program that provides property owners with clear and accessible information prior to initiating the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings and throughout the balloting period. This effort will include a nonadvocacy communication strategy tailored to City property owners, identification of informational needs and audiences, key messaging, and a coordinated outreach schedule. SCI will prepare factual materials, including presentations, handouts, brochures, FAQs, email content, and meeting notices, to explain the purpose, structure, and implications of the proposed assessment. The program may also include a digital feedback survey, informational social media posts, and followup emails to help ensure that property owners receive timely information and can request clarification before the ballot is issued.

SCI will use our Local Input platform to house much of this information on a dedicated project page, providing a single, easily accessible location where property owners can review materials, access updates, and submit general feedback.

Task Deliverables:
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ Informational outreach strategy and timeline (MS Word) ▪ FAQ, handouts, slide decks, and related informational materials (Word, PPT, PDF) ▪ Local Input project page
▪ One informational email campaign
▪ Mailers, upon City request and at additional expense
▪ City training on informational outreach versus advocacy (virtual) ▪ Public informational meetings (1 virtual, 1 in-person) ▪ Property owner inquiry support and responses
TASK 6: PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT PROCEEDING SERVICES
Under this task, SCI will manage the entire Proposition 218 mailed ballot proceeding, including the design, production, mailing, and administration of all official assessment notices and ballots to property owners within the proposed Assessment Districts. The official notice, ballot design, and accompanying informational materials are critical to a successful and legally compliant proceeding.

SCI will prepare materials that clearly and accurately explain the purpose and structure of the proposed assessment measures while meeting all constitutional and statutory requirements.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 118 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 7 of 12 ends

Once the draft notice and ballot are prepared, they will be provided to the City and its legal counsel for review and comment. Following the incorporation of all feedback, SCI will oversee the printing, addressing, and mailing of the official notices and ballots. Throughout the balloting process, SCI will assist the City in managing all aspects of ballot administration and communication with property owners. SCI will respond to inquiries regarding ballot content, assessment amounts, and procedures; monitor and research undeliverable ballots; and coordinate with the County Assessor and Recorder’s offices to confirm updated ownership or mailing information. Replacement ballots will be prepared and issued as needed to ensure that every eligible property owner has the opportunity to participate in the proceeding. SCI will also maintain a detailed record of mailed, returned, and replacement ballots to support transparency and accountability.

Additionally, SCI will prepare all necessary resolutions, staff reports, and public hearing materials and will assist the City and its legal counsel in addressing property owner testimony during the hearing. The City Clerk will serve as the official tabulator in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Ballot tabulation will occur at the public hearing, with results announced at the City Council meeting, where the Council may consider levying the assessment if approved. SCI will provide tabulation software, ballot scanners, and established procedures to ensure a transparent and efficient process. SCI’s barcoded ballot identification system will be utilized to maintain the accuracy, integrity, and reliability of the results.

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project meeting(s) (Virtual)
▪ Official Proposition 218 notice, ballot, and envelopes ▪ Printing, mailing, addressing, and postage for Proposition 218 balloting ▪ City Council meetings (3 In-Person)
▪ Draft resolutions and supporting documents
▪ Balloting process support
▪ Tabulation support

IN-PERSON MEETINGS
The Work Plan includes up to six in-person meetings. All other meetings and presentations with staff, City Committees, City Council, or other related groups will be conducted virtually. If requested by the City, SCI is available to attend additional in-person meetings at our standard in-person meeting rates.

CITY RESOURCES
SCI will carry out all tasks specified in the Work Plan and any other related services, as appropriate.

The City would be responsible for the following:
▪ Periodically meet or participate in video or voice conference calls with SCI as needed. ▪ Provide information and documentation regarding the City’s Master Plan, if available, capital improvement plan, description of services and improvements to be funded by the assessment, the annual revenues needed, and additional data as requested. ▪ Designate a City point of contact with authority to act on its behalf regarding the Work Plan. ▪ Assist with the planning, review, and coordination of action items.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 119 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 8 of 12 ends

TENTATIVE TIMELINE
We understand that the City would like to complete the Proposition 218 ballot proceeding sometime in 2026 or early 2027. At this stage, the overall timeline will remain flexible, with a focus on building a strong foundation for community engagement and ensuring that residents have clear, accessible information throughout the Proposition 218 process.

The preliminary Engineer’s Reports, public outreach, and the ballot proceeding will all be sequenced to support a thoughtful and transparent process. Prior to the kickoff meeting, SCI will work with City staff to outline a proposed schedule, and the final project timeline will be developed collaboratively during that meeting to ensure it aligns with the City’s goals, community needs, and any required coordination steps.

Our approach emphasizes early and ongoing engagement, recognizing that project success depends not just on meeting procedural requirements but also on ensuring residents understand the proposed assessment and feel meaningfully included at every step. If additional time is needed for outreach or stakeholder communication, the ballot proceeding may occur later in 2026 or in early 2027.

ASSESSMENT SUPPORT AND VALIDATION
In the event of a challenge to the assessments, any claims by one or more property owners that they do not receive the special benefits indicated in the Engineer’s Reports, or other allegations challenging the validity of the Engineer’s Reports and its methodology in determining the assessments, SCI will provide any necessary professional assessment engineering assistance to support the assessments at no additional cost to the City.

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Established in 1985, SCIConsultingGroup is a widely recognized public finance consulting firm with leading expertise in helping California public agencies fund essential services and capital improvements. SCI has extensive experience forming and administering landscape, lighting, and maintenance assessment districts throughout California and has guided many public agencies through successful Proposition 218 processes for similar types of benefit assessments.

Our track record speaks for itself. SCI has a proven 90% success rate with local funding measures, including benefit assessments, special taxes, and property-related fees. That success rate increases to 95% when public agencies follow our proven approach, grounded in thoughtful planning, a clear understanding of property owner sentiment, alignment of the measure with the results of a professionally conducted survey, and a well-executed informational outreach effort. This strategic process not only maximizes success but also ensures legal defensibility and builds public trust.

SCI is exceptionally well-qualified to serve as the City’s Assessment Engineer and Proposition 218 consultant for this City-wide benefit assessment district formation. We bring unmatched technical Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 120 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 9 of 12 ends

and legal expertise, including in-depth experience applying Proposition 218 requirements and related case law to ensure compliance, transparency, and defensibility. Our qualifications include:
▪ Serving California public agencies for four decades.
▪ Administers over 1,000 assessments, special taxes, and fees for more than 200 public agencies annually.
▪ The most comprehensive Proposition 218 expertise in the State, including deep knowledge of benefit analysis, general benefit calculations, and assessment apportionment. ▪ Proven record of forming and administering hundreds of benefit assessment districts statewide.
▪ Extensive experience working with public agencies throughout Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, including the Cities of Richmond, Walnut Creek, Lafayette, Berkeley, Hayward, Oakland, and Pleasanton. County clients include the County of Contra Costa and Alameda County. School district clients include Lafayette School District, Martinez USD, Walnut Creek School District, West Contra Costa USD, Alameda USD, Dublin USD, Hayward USD, San Leandro USD, San Lorenzo USD, and Albany USD. Additional clients include Bethel Island MID, Pleasant Hill RPD, RD 2029, AC Transit, Alameda County MVCD, Washington Township Health Care District, and the Alameda County Household Hazardous Waste Program.
▪ Active members and frequent presenters at conferences and workshops hosted by the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (“CSMFO”), California Special Districts Association (“CSDA), and other professional organizations. ▪ Longstanding relationships with our clients reflect our commitment to providing the highest level of service.

Client references are available on request.

PROJECT TEAM
If selected for the project, SCI will assign a highly qualified and experienced team to support the City throughout the Proposition 218 benefit assessment process. Together, the project team brings more than 69 years of cumulative experience in assessment engineering, ballot proceedings, and Proposition 218 compliance for California public agencies. The roles and brief biographies of the proposed project team members are provided below.

Melanie Lee, Senior Consultant, will serve as Project Manager for the Proposition 218 benefit assessment measure. She will coordinate all phases of the project, oversee preparation and quality control of parcel data, support development of the assessment methodology, and manage all informational materials and project deliverables. Melanie has more than 16 years of experience managing local revenue measure projects, benefit assessment formations, and public communication programs for California public agencies. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration from St. Mary’s College of California.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 121 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 10 of 12 ends

John Bliss, President, P.E., License No. C052091, will serve as the Assessment Engineer of Work. He will be responsible for preparing the Engineer’s Reports and providing assessment engineering services in compliance with Proposition 218 requirements. John has been with SCI for over 24 years and has served as the responsible Assessment Engineer on more than 300 Engineer’s Reports for new or increased assessments. He is a licensed Professional Civil Engineer in the State of California and has extensive experience in special and general benefit analysis, database design, cost estimating, and revenue measure formation. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Brown University and a Master’s in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley.

Susan Barnes, Vice President, will serve as Principal in Charge, providing seniorlevel oversight throughout the preparation of the Engineer’s Reports, the mailed notice and ballot process, and all compliance steps under Proposition 218. She will conduct a detailed review of the assessment methodology, benefit findings, and ballot materials to ensure accuracy and consistency. Susan has been with SCI since 2006 and holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Master of Science in Organizational Development from Sonoma State University.

Heather Jamison, Consultant, will serve as Outreach Consultant for the period before and during the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings. She will assist with the preparation of clear public information materials, support communication with property owners, and help coordinate outreach efforts during the mailed ballot period.

Heather brings over a decade of experience in stakeholder engagement and holds a Bachelor’s degree from California State University, Sacramento.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 122 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 11 of 12 ends

FEE SCHEDULE AND MANNER OF PAYMENT
In consideration of the work accomplished, as outlined in the Work Plan, SCI shall be compensated as detailed below. Our professional fees are based on our understanding of the City’s needs and the level of effort we expect to be necessary to complete the Work Plan successfully.

It is important to note that the proposed fees assume both assessment measures will be completed concurrently. If the work proceeds separately, revised fees will be necessary.

TASKS 1,2 FEE
Task 1: Discovery and Assessment Review $8,000 Fixed
Task 2: Informed Outreach Presentation $22,600 Fixed
Task 3: Initial Planning and Preliminary Assessment Engineering $14,400 Fixed Task 4: Assessment Engineering and Engineer’s Reports (2) $37,700 Fixed Task 5: Non-Advocacy Informational Outreach Services $12,500 Fixed Task 6: Proposition 218 Ballot Proceeding Services $23,900 Fixed SUBTOTAL $119,100
Incidental Costs 3 $2,500 NTE
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $121,600
Contingency (5%) 4 $6,080 NTE
TOTAL AUTHORIZATION (including contingency) 1,3 $127,680 As necessary and at the City's discretion, SCI will attend additional in-person meetings at the inperson meeting rate of $1,120 per consultant per meeting for the duration of the Work Plan. All other project meetings, stakeholder outreach meetings, and presentations will be conducted remotely via video or voice conference. Video and voice conferences are not considered in-person meetings in the Work Plan.
2 SCI shall submit an invoice upon completion of each task, with payment due upon receipt. For Task 4, which includes all direct costs for printing, addressing, mailing, and postage, SCI will invoice 30% of the task fee in advance to cover required deposits. This advance payment must be received prior to mailing the notice and ballots.
3 Customary incidental expenses, including travel, lodging, printing, postage, data, or other out‐of‐ pocket costs, shall be reimbursed at actual cost plus 10% not to exceed $2,500, without prior authorization from the City. Mileage expenses shall be billed at the IRS‐approved rate. 4 A five percent contingency is included for potential additional work that may arise during the project, which is not anticipated. This amount is not part of the proposed cost and would be used only at the City’s discretion and with written authorization for activities such as additional inperson meetings, expanded non-advocacy informational outreach, or other out-of-scope services.

All costs in this Work Plan may be funded or reimbursed from the assessment levies if the measures are approved.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 123 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 12 of 12 ends

OTHER INFORMATION AND AGREEMENT TERMS
Independent Contractor. SCI shall perform all services included in this proposal as an independent contractor if selected.

Cancellation. The City or SCI may end the engagement without cause with reasonable written notice. In the event that the engagement is canceled, payment shall still be due for all work performed by SCI, including any portion of a task, up to the date of notification of cancellation.

Insurance Requirements. SCI carries professional errors and omissions insurance in the amount of $2 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate. SCI also carries general liability insurance in the amount of $2 million per occurrence and $4 million aggregate. SCI will provide the City with a certificate of insurance upon request.

Indemnification. Pursuant to California Civil Code Section 2782.8, and as a designated design professional, SCI will defend and indemnify the City only for claims arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of SCI in performing the Work Plan.

Conflict of Interest Statements. SCI has no known past, ongoing, or potential conflicts of interest for working with the City, performing the scope of work, or any other service for this project.

Employment Policies. SCI ensures compliance with all civil rights laws and other related statutes.

SCI does not and shall not discriminate against any employee in the workplace, against any applicant for such employment, or against any other person because of race, religion, sex, color, national origin, handicap, age, or any other arbitrary basis.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 124 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Total AD 20 AD 22
Task 1 Discovery $8,000 $5,200 $2,800
Task 2 Outreach $22,600 $15,820 $6,780
Task3 Initial planning, preliminary $14,400 $10,080 $4,320 Task4 ER $37,700 $20,735 $16,965
Task 5 Proposition 218 Ballot Outreach $12,500 $7,500 $5,000 Task 6 Balloting $23,900 $16,730 $7,170
$119,100 $76,065 $43,035
Incidental Costs $2,500 $1,875 $625
$121,600 $77,940 $43,660
Contingency $6,080 $3,952 $2,128
$127,680 $81,892 $45,788
City of Pleasant Hill Assessment Engineering, Proposition 218 Balloting Services Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 125 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: March 2, 2026
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. __-26 AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH SCI CONSULTING GROUP TO PROVIDE

ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT RATE INCREASE WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 22

SYNOPSIS
The purpose of this item is to authorize a Professional Services Agreement with SCI Consulting Group, to provide Assessment Engineering Services for proposed assessment rate increases within Assessment District 22.

The usage fee rate has not increased since 2002, and it is necessary to increase rates to address increases in operating costs and to fund needed maintenance along certain public streets and easements.

DISCUSSION
Background
Assessment District 22 (AD22) consists of two subdivisions: Grayson Woods, which was formed in 1997; and Gallery Walk, which was annexed into the District in 2002. The District pays for the ongoing maintenance and servicing of landscaping and lighting improvements along public streets and easements within the District.

These landscape and lighting improvements are considered to be of direct benefit to the properties within the AD 22 boundaries. The maintenance activities include weekly mowing and edging of turf; maintenance and repair of irrigation systems; pruning, weeding, and debris removal; graffiti removal; streetlight repair; and utility charges for water in Grayson Woods and electricity in both Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk. The funding for the maintenance and services is provided through annual assessments paid by benefiting property owners within the Assessment District.

Over the past several years the annual maintenance and servicing costs have increased while the assessment rates for AD22 have remained relatively unchanged.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 126 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 The annual reports prepared by the Engineer of Record for FY2023/24 determined that several zones with AD22 were either in a funding deficit or trending in that direction, and without additional assessment revenue, the City would have to reduce the level of services being provided to each zone. The City Council, at the June 5, 2023, City Council meeting, directed staff to pursue a Proposition 218 vote for AD22. The purpose of the Proposition 218 vote was to establish an increased assessment rate for the under-funded zones and to incorporate an annual escalation factor to keep pace with inflation.

On February 26, 2024, the City Council approved Resolution No. 20-24 authorizing the Engineer of Record (Harris and Associates) to perform Assessment Engineering Services for a Proposed Rate Increase for AD22. In June 2024, the City Council conducted a public hearing to review the proposed assessment rate increases to AD 22. The vote was conducted by majority protest and neither Grayson Woods nor Gallery Walk approved the assessment rate increase, leaving both zones underfunded. As a result, annual maintenance and services have been decreased commensurate with the funding available for Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk.

Annual utility and maintenance costs have continued to increase, and without the additional, needed funding, the services provided to the underfunded zones will continue to decrease, including irrigation in Grayson Woods, and landscaping, tree trimming and lighting repairs in both zones. To obtain additional funding, the City Council recommended staff pursue a second Proposition 218 vote. To that end, in December 2024, staff issued an RFP for a new Engineer of Work, with a focus on contracting with a consultant who demonstrated a proven track record for obtaining successful Proposition 218 results.

In February 2025 the City Council approved Resolution No. 6-25, designating SCI Consulting Group (SCI) as the City’s Engineer of Work, to provide Assessment Engineering and District Services to the City for AD20. These services included an initial and comprehensive Proposition 218 compliance, parcel and assessment levy audit.

SCI’s first order of work was to conduct the comprehensive Proposition 218 Compliance, Parcel and Levy audit during the first levy year for AD20. This audit, now complete, reviewed all parcels and levy data to ensure accuracy and compliance with Proposition 218 and the assessment methodology. Additionally, the audit identified discrepancies, validated assessment methodologies, and established a solid foundation for ongoing levy administration.

The annual reports prepared by SCI in June 2025 for FY2025/26 funding determined that both Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk are still in a funding deficit, and without additional assessment revenue, the City will need to reduce further the level of services provided to each zone. SCI also recommended pursuing a new Proposition 218 vote to ensure Proposition 218 compliance, establish an increased assessment rate for all the parcels within the under-funded zones, and to incorporate an annual escalation factor to keep pace with inflation.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 127 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Analysis
On December 9, 2025, SCI submitted a proposal for Assessment Engineering and Proposition 218 Balloting Services (see Exhibit A) for proposed new assessment rate measures. The scope of work includes preparation of new engineer’s reports, all required assessment engineering, and a clear, non-advocacy informational outreach program to support the City through each phase of the Proposition 218 process.

SCI’s cost proposal for the work is $45,788 and includes the following:
 Discovery and Assessment Review – this task involves evaluating the 2024 ballot outcome, reviewing available materials and identifying concerns, informational gaps, and zonespecific issues  Informed Outreach Preparation – this task focuses on developing a targeted, factual, and informational outreach strategy based on the findings from Task 1, including zone specific communication and dedicated outreach for key property-owner groups  Initial Planning and Preliminary Assessment Engineering – this task involves early project planning and preliminary assessment engineering to establish the foundation for potential assessment measures
 Assessment Engineering and Engineer’s Reports – this task includes developing the final assessment methodology, determining the proposed assessment for each parcel, preparing the Engineer’s reports, and finalizing the assessment measures and messaging plans  Non-Advocacy Property Owner Informational Outreach Services – to ensure a successful outcome, SCI will advise and support staff with non-advocacy outreach before and during the ballot proceeding, providing the public with clear and accurate information about the proposed assessments
 Proposition 218 Ballot Proceeding Services – SCI will assist and fully support staff with the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings, including resolutions, designing, mailing and tabulating official notices and assessment ballots, as well as conducting the public ballot tabulations
The project will be based on the requirements of the 1972 Act and Proposition 218. SCI’s team understands the requirements of Proposition 218 and the importance of developing a strategy that will minimize the risk of a challenge. Based on SCI’s experience as the current Engineer of Work for AD22, and their familiarity with the City and staff, Engineering staff believes SCI is uniquely qualified to complete the work efficiently, and with minimal guidance. Their knowledge of the Proposition 218 process and AD22 will allow them to quickly answer questions from the City Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 128 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Council, staff and the general public, while maintaining and protecting the best interests of the City, and to ensure a positive outcome.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of preparing all necessary reports required for the Assessment Engineering Services for the Proposed Assessment Rate Increases for AD22 will be borne by the property owners within AD22. The not-to-exceed amount for the engineering services specified in the Professional Services Agreement is $45,788, which will be paid by the Assessment District.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt Resolution

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
None recommended.

ATTACHMENT(S)
Proposed Resolution
Exhibit A – Cost Proposal
Exhibit B - Agreement
Prepared by: Ann James, Public Works Director
Reviewed by: Janet Coleson, City Attorney
Approved by: Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 129 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 RESOLUTION NO. __-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH SCI CONSULTING GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED RATE INCREASE FOR ASSESSMENT DISTICT 22 WHEREAS, on December 1, 1997, by Resolution No. 88-97, the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill ordered the formation of and levied the first assessment within Assessment District No. 22, City of Pleasant Hill, Contra Costa County, State of California (the "District"), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (commencing at Section 22500 of the California Streets and Highways Code) (herein referred to as "the Act"); and WHEREAS, Assessment District 22 (AD22) was amended in 2002 to include Subdivision 8304, Gallery Walk; and
WHEREAS, Section 22620 et seq., of the Act provides for the levy of annual assessments after the formation of the District; and
WHEREAS, SCI Consulting Group is designated as Engineer of Work for purposes of the Districts within the Districts; and
WHEREAS, the annual maintenance and servicing costs have increased while the assessment rates AD22 have remained relatively unchanged, and the City Council is initiating a Proposition 218 vote based on the requirements of the 1972 Act and Proposition 218.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill authorizes the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement (Exhibit A) with SCI Consulting Group for assessment engineering services for Assessment District 22 in an amount not to exceed $45,788.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 2 nd day of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________
ZAC SHESS Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
LYONE P. CONNER, City Clerk
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 130 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Submitted via Email
Ann James [email protected]
City of Pleasant Hill
Attn: Ann James, Public Works Director
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3323
Re: Proposal for Assessment Engineering, Proposition 218 Balloting Services, and Related Professional Consulting Services
Dear Ms. James:

SCIConsultingGroup (“SCI”) is pleased to submit this proposal to provide Assessment Engineering, Proposition 218 Balloting Services, and Related Professional Consulting Services to the City of Pleasant Hill (“City”) for the proposed new assessment measures for Assessment District No. 20 (Commercial Area Landscape and Lighting) and Assessment District No. 22 (Landscape and Streetlighting Maintenance District). This scope includes preparation of new engineers’ reports, all required assessment engineering, and a clear, non-advocacy informational outreach program to support the City through each phase of the Proposition 218 process.

This proposal outlines a structured, evidence-based approach that integrates discovery, assessment engineering, and non-advocacy informational outreach. Our goal is to support the City with a legally defensible assessment structure and a transparent process that provides property owners with clear and accessible information.

Based on our preliminary discussions with the City, our proposal is organized into the six tasks outlined below. These tasks reflect SCI’s recommended approach to support the City from early evaluation through final Proposition 218 balloting.

Task 1: Discovery and Assessment Review. This task involves evaluating the 2024 ballot outcome, reviewing available materials, and identifying the concerns, informational gaps, and zone-specific issues that should guide the City’s next steps.

Task 2: Informed Outreach Preparation. This task involves developing a targeted, factual, informational outreach strategy based on the findings from Task 1, including zone-specific communication and dedicated outreach for key property-owner groups.

Task 3: Initial Planning and Preliminary Assessment Engineering. This task involves early project planning and preliminary assessment engineering to establish the framework and foundation for potential assessment measures.

EXHIBIT A
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 131 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 2 of 12 ends

Task 4: Assessment Engineering and Engineer’s Reports. This task involves developing the final assessment methodology, determining the specific proposed assessment for each parcel, preparing the Engineer’s Reports, and finalizing the assessment measures and messaging plans for each.

Task 5: Non-Advocacy Property-Owner Informational Outreach Services. To ensure a successful outcome, we will advise and support the City with non-advocacy informational outreach before and during the ballot proceeding, providing the public with clear and accurate information about the proposed assessment measures.

Task 6: Proposition 218 Ballot Proceeding Services. We will assist and fully support the City with the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings. This includes preparing all necessary resolutions, designing, mailing, and tabulating official notices and assessment ballots, as well as conducting the public ballot tabulations.

We look forward to this opportunity to assist the City with this important project and stand ready to proceed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at 707-430-4300 and [email protected]. Melanie Lee can be reached at 707-430-4300 ext. 120 and [email protected]
Sincerely,
John W. Bliss, P.E., President
SCI Consulting Group
cc: Melanie Lee, SCI Consulting Group
Heather Jamison, SCI Consulting Group
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 132 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 3 of 12 ends

WORK PLAN AND APPROACH
SCI proposes a phased, collaborative approach that moves from an early understanding of the 2024 outcome through assessment engineering to final Proposition 218 balloting. Each task builds on the prior task, ensuring a consistent progression that integrates discovery, technical analysis, and factual informational outreach. Our process is designed to reduce demands on City staff while providing legally defensible work products that meet all requirements of Proposition 218.

TASK 1: DISCOVERY AND ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Before moving toward a future Proposition 218 effort, the City will benefit from a clear and objective understanding of the factors that affected the 2024 ballot outcome and the current perspectives of property owners in AD No. 20 and AD No. 22. This diagnostic phase establishes the factual foundation needed to guide assessment structure development and future informational outreach.

SCI will analyze 2024 ballot return patterns and participation rates, including zone level voting results and turnout trends. Staff will also review protest letters, correspondence, meeting notes, and prior informational materials to identify the themes, concerns, and informational gaps that may have influenced the prior result. In addition, SCI will perform a preliminary review of past informational messaging to evaluate clarity, identify areas for refinement, and determine which topics may require enhanced explanation for property owners.

Findings from Task 1 will directly inform the outreach preparation in Task 2 and the preliminary engineering work in Task 3.TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Information and data request list
▪ Project kickoff meeting (Virtual)
▪ Project timeline
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ 15–20 stakeholder interviews with property owners, HOA representatives, and business leaders
▪ Obstacles and Opportunities Assessment Memorandum (MS Word / PDF) ▪ 2024 Assessment Outcome Analysis Memorandum (MS Word / PDF) ▪ Stakeholder Interview Summary (MS Word / PDF)
TASK 2: INFORMED OUTREACH PREPARATION
Task 2 builds on the diagnostic findings from Task 1 and focuses on developing the components of a factual, legally compliant informational outreach program for later use in a future Proposition 218 process. SCI will prepare an outreach strategy tailored to the characteristics of each district zone and the informational needs of the various groups of property owners. This will include zone specific approaches where additional clarification may be warranted, and dedicated informational guidance for condominium owners and recently added residential parcels.

As part of this preparation work, SCI will draft factual informational materials, design a digital survey to gather additional community input (if requested by the City), and prepare content for use on a project website or Local Input page. While Task 2 focuses on preparation, certain outreach activities Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 133 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 4 of 12 ends

included in the deliverables may be conducted during this phase as part of the City’s effort to ensure transparency and gather early feedback to shape the next Proposition 218 process. Full implementation of informational outreach supporting a ballot proceeding will occur later under Task 5, after preliminary assessment engineering is complete.

Local Input is an SCI platform that facilitates community 0engagement and fosters collaboration between local
government, voters, and key stakeholders. Through this
customizable online platform, Local Input enhances
transparency, community participation, and decision-making processes at the local level. This enables voters to become more informed, voice their opinions, contribute ideas, and share feedback regarding a proposed local funding measure.

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ Digital survey and summary of survey results (MS Word / PDF) ▪ Public informational meetings (two virtual; two in-person) ▪ Factual outreach materials, including FAQs, handouts, presentations, and email content (Word / PPT / PDF)
▪ Website or Local Input project page content
▪ Summary of outreach findings and key themes memorandum (MS Word / PDF) TASK 3: INITIAL PLANNING AND PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING Task 3 begins the technical assessment engineering work, informed by the findings from Tasks 1 and

2. SCI will analyze the proposed improvements and services, property ownership characteristics, and district boundaries to establish the framework for the proposed assessment measures. SCI will collect and review property data from the City, the County Assessor, and other sources to confirm parcel characteristics and eligibility. This preliminary engineering work will guide development of the assessment methodology and ensure consistency with the City’s objectives.

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ Assessment Measures Timeline
▪ Preliminary assessment engineering findings
TASK 4: ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING AND ENGINEER’S REPORTS (2) With the discovery, early outreach preparation, and preliminary engineering work complete, Task 4 develops the formal assessment methodology and prepares the Engineer’s Reports required under Proposition 218. The findings from Tasks 1 through 3 ensure that the assessment structure, data assumptions, and supporting documentation reflect the City’s objectives, the characteristics of benefiting parcels, and the information themes identified earlier in the project.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 134 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 5 of 12 ends

If the City proceeds with the formation of the assessment districts, SCI will develop multi-year revenue and expense projections based on City input. These projections will serve as the foundation for the budgets and cost estimates included in the Engineer’s Reports. Comprehensive assessment engineering work will involve defining the proportional assessment rate methodology and separating and quantifying both special and general benefits from the proposed improvements and services.

SCI will apply its industry-leading benefit assessment engineering expertise to develop a method that fully complies with the legal and procedural requirements for a new, post-Proposition 218 benefit assessment, including the court’s direction in Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority, Dahms v. City of Pomona, Greene v. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Robert Beutz v. County of Riverside, and other Proposition 218 decisions.

In a review session, SCI will present these fiscal plans, our data review and analysis, and the proposed assessment methodology, levies, and budgets to the City. Issues uncovered by the review will be highlighted, and remedies suggested. After the City and the City’s legal counsel have reviewed the data and information, SCI will prepare Engineer’s Reports that fully meet the requirements of Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”), the Government Code, and other relevant code sections.

The Engineer’s Reports will be prepared by John Bliss, P.E., an assessment engineer with 24 years of extensive assessment engineering experience. The Engineer’s Reports will include a detailed description of the assessment plans for the improvements and services, future capital and facility improvement needs, a detailed cost estimate, an analysis of special and general benefits, the rationale used for the assessment apportionment, the method of assessment apportionment, calculation of the specific proposed assessment amount for each parcel, an assessment diagram, and other elements.

After the Engineer’s Reports have been prepared, they will be reviewed with City staff and, if necessary, shall be revised to reflect any relevant comments or issues identified. SCI shall also finalize the assessment levies, roll, diagram, and other information for preliminary City approval. SCI will also prepare draft resolutions, notices, and other materials and documents required or recommended for the proposed assessment. Such documents shall be finalized in conjunction with the City’s legal counsel. At the culmination of these services, SCI shall present the findings, proposed assessment levies, and the Engineer’s Reports to the City staff and the City Council (“Council”).

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project Meeting (Virtual)
▪ Proposition 218-compliant Engineer’s Reports (PDF)
▪ Draft resolutions and associated agenda reports (MS Word) ▪ Presentation at City Council meeting (In-Person)
TASK 5: NON-ADVOCACY PROPERTY-OWNER INFORMATIONAL OUTREACH SERVICES Effective informational outreach is essential for a successful ballot outcome. Property owners need a clear understanding of the purpose, need, and structure of any proposed assessment measure before they can make an informed decision. When property owners receive straightforward, accessible information about what the measure would fund, why it is needed, and how it would Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 135 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 6 of 12 ends

affect them, they are far more likely to view the proposal with confidence. Conversely, limited information, unanswered questions, or general mistrust can lead to uncertainty and ultimately a no vote.

Under California law, the City may provide informational communications regarding City issues, including assessment measures, so long as those communications remain strictly factual and nonadvocacy. All materials must be objective and balanced, presenting the measure’s purpose, background, and impacts without attempting to influence the outcome.

Task 5 continues the outreach preparation completed in Task 2 and provides property owners with factual and accessible information about the proposed assessment measures during the Proposition 218 process. Task 5 services begin after completion of the preliminary Engineers Reports. SCI will work with the City to develop and implement an informational outreach program that provides property owners with clear and accessible information prior to initiating the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings and throughout the balloting period. This effort will include a nonadvocacy communication strategy tailored to City property owners, identification of informational needs and audiences, key messaging, and a coordinated outreach schedule. SCI will prepare factual materials, including presentations, handouts, brochures, FAQs, email content, and meeting notices, to explain the purpose, structure, and implications of the proposed assessment. The program may also include a digital feedback survey, informational social media posts, and followup emails to help ensure that property owners receive timely information and can request clarification before the ballot is issued.

SCI will use our Local Input platform to house much of this information on a dedicated project page, providing a single, easily accessible location where property owners can review materials, access updates, and submit general feedback.

Task Deliverables:
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ Informational outreach strategy and timeline (MS Word) ▪ FAQ, handouts, slide decks, and related informational materials (Word, PPT, PDF) ▪ Local Input project page
▪ One informational email campaign
▪ Mailers, upon City request and at additional expense
▪ City training on informational outreach versus advocacy (virtual) ▪ Public informational meetings (1 virtual, 1 in-person) ▪ Property owner inquiry support and responses
TASK 6: PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT PROCEEDING SERVICES
Under this task, SCI will manage the entire Proposition 218 mailed ballot proceeding, including the design, production, mailing, and administration of all official assessment notices and ballots to property owners within the proposed Assessment Districts. The official notice, ballot design, and accompanying informational materials are critical to a successful and legally compliant proceeding.

SCI will prepare materials that clearly and accurately explain the purpose and structure of the proposed assessment measures while meeting all constitutional and statutory requirements.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 136 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 7 of 12 ends

Once the draft notice and ballot are prepared, they will be provided to the City and its legal counsel for review and comment. Following the incorporation of all feedback, SCI will oversee the printing, addressing, and mailing of the official notices and ballots. Throughout the balloting process, SCI will assist the City in managing all aspects of ballot administration and communication with property owners. SCI will respond to inquiries regarding ballot content, assessment amounts, and procedures; monitor and research undeliverable ballots; and coordinate with the County Assessor and Recorder’s offices to confirm updated ownership or mailing information. Replacement ballots will be prepared and issued as needed to ensure that every eligible property owner has the opportunity to participate in the proceeding. SCI will also maintain a detailed record of mailed, returned, and replacement ballots to support transparency and accountability.

Additionally, SCI will prepare all necessary resolutions, staff reports, and public hearing materials and will assist the City and its legal counsel in addressing property owner testimony during the hearing. The City Clerk will serve as the official tabulator in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Ballot tabulation will occur at the public hearing, with results announced at the City Council meeting, where the Council may consider levying the assessment if approved. SCI will provide tabulation software, ballot scanners, and established procedures to ensure a transparent and efficient process. SCI’s barcoded ballot identification system will be utilized to maintain the accuracy, integrity, and reliability of the results.

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project meeting(s) (Virtual)
▪ Official Proposition 218 notice, ballot, and envelopes ▪ Printing, mailing, addressing, and postage for Proposition 218 balloting ▪ City Council meetings (3 In-Person)
▪ Draft resolutions and supporting documents
▪ Balloting process support
▪ Tabulation support

IN-PERSON MEETINGS
The Work Plan includes up to six in-person meetings. All other meetings and presentations with staff, City Committees, City Council, or other related groups will be conducted virtually. If requested by the City, SCI is available to attend additional in-person meetings at our standard in-person meeting rates.

CITY RESOURCES
SCI will carry out all tasks specified in the Work Plan and any other related services, as appropriate.

The City would be responsible for the following:
▪ Periodically meet or participate in video or voice conference calls with SCI as needed. ▪ Provide information and documentation regarding the City’s Master Plan, if available, capital improvement plan, description of services and improvements to be funded by the assessment, the annual revenues needed, and additional data as requested. ▪ Designate a City point of contact with authority to act on its behalf regarding the Work Plan. ▪ Assist with the planning, review, and coordination of action items.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 137 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 8 of 12 ends

TENTATIVE TIMELINE
We understand that the City would like to complete the Proposition 218 ballot proceeding sometime in 2026 or early 2027. At this stage, the overall timeline will remain flexible, with a focus on building a strong foundation for community engagement and ensuring that residents have clear, accessible information throughout the Proposition 218 process.

The preliminary Engineer’s Reports, public outreach, and the ballot proceeding will all be sequenced to support a thoughtful and transparent process. Prior to the kickoff meeting, SCI will work with City staff to outline a proposed schedule, and the final project timeline will be developed collaboratively during that meeting to ensure it aligns with the City’s goals, community needs, and any required coordination steps.

Our approach emphasizes early and ongoing engagement, recognizing that project success depends not just on meeting procedural requirements but also on ensuring residents understand the proposed assessment and feel meaningfully included at every step. If additional time is needed for outreach or stakeholder communication, the ballot proceeding may occur later in 2026 or in early 2027.

ASSESSMENT SUPPORT AND VALIDATION
In the event of a challenge to the assessments, any claims by one or more property owners that they do not receive the special benefits indicated in the Engineer’s Reports, or other allegations challenging the validity of the Engineer’s Reports and its methodology in determining the assessments, SCI will provide any necessary professional assessment engineering assistance to support the assessments at no additional cost to the City.

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Established in 1985, SCIConsultingGroup is a widely recognized public finance consulting firm with leading expertise in helping California public agencies fund essential services and capital improvements. SCI has extensive experience forming and administering landscape, lighting, and maintenance assessment districts throughout California and has guided many public agencies through successful Proposition 218 processes for similar types of benefit assessments.

Our track record speaks for itself. SCI has a proven 90% success rate with local funding measures, including benefit assessments, special taxes, and property-related fees. That success rate increases to 95% when public agencies follow our proven approach, grounded in thoughtful planning, a clear understanding of property owner sentiment, alignment of the measure with the results of a professionally conducted survey, and a well-executed informational outreach effort. This strategic process not only maximizes success but also ensures legal defensibility and builds public trust.

SCI is exceptionally well-qualified to serve as the City’s Assessment Engineer and Proposition 218 consultant for this City-wide benefit assessment district formation. We bring unmatched technical Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 138 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 9 of 12 ends

and legal expertise, including in-depth experience applying Proposition 218 requirements and related case law to ensure compliance, transparency, and defensibility. Our qualifications include:
▪ Serving California public agencies for four decades.
▪ Administers over 1,000 assessments, special taxes, and fees for more than 200 public agencies annually.
▪ The most comprehensive Proposition 218 expertise in the State, including deep knowledge of benefit analysis, general benefit calculations, and assessment apportionment. ▪ Proven record of forming and administering hundreds of benefit assessment districts statewide.
▪ Extensive experience working with public agencies throughout Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, including the Cities of Richmond, Walnut Creek, Lafayette, Berkeley, Hayward, Oakland, and Pleasanton. County clients include the County of Contra Costa and Alameda County. School district clients include Lafayette School District, Martinez USD, Walnut Creek School District, West Contra Costa USD, Alameda USD, Dublin USD, Hayward USD, San Leandro USD, San Lorenzo USD, and Albany USD. Additional clients include Bethel Island MID, Pleasant Hill RPD, RD 2029, AC Transit, Alameda County MVCD, Washington Township Health Care District, and the Alameda County Household Hazardous Waste Program.
▪ Active members and frequent presenters at conferences and workshops hosted by the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (“CSMFO”), California Special Districts Association (“CSDA), and other professional organizations. ▪ Longstanding relationships with our clients reflect our commitment to providing the highest level of service.

Client references are available on request.

PROJECT TEAM
If selected for the project, SCI will assign a highly qualified and experienced team to support the City throughout the Proposition 218 benefit assessment process. Together, the project team brings more than 69 years of cumulative experience in assessment engineering, ballot proceedings, and Proposition 218 compliance for California public agencies. The roles and brief biographies of the proposed project team members are provided below.

Melanie Lee, Senior Consultant, will serve as Project Manager for the Proposition 218 benefit assessment measure. She will coordinate all phases of the project, oversee preparation and quality control of parcel data, support development of the assessment methodology, and manage all informational materials and project deliverables. Melanie has more than 16 years of experience managing local revenue measure projects, benefit assessment formations, and public communication programs for California public agencies. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration from St. Mary’s College of California.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 139 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 10 of 12 ends

John Bliss, President, P.E., License No. C052091, will serve as the Assessment Engineer of Work. He will be responsible for preparing the Engineer’s Reports and providing assessment engineering services in compliance with Proposition 218 requirements. John has been with SCI for over 24 years and has served as the responsible Assessment Engineer on more than 300 Engineer’s Reports for new or increased assessments. He is a licensed Professional Civil Engineer in the State of California and has extensive experience in special and general benefit analysis, database design, cost estimating, and revenue measure formation. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Brown University and a Master’s in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley.

Susan Barnes, Vice President, will serve as Principal in Charge, providing seniorlevel oversight throughout the preparation of the Engineer’s Reports, the mailed notice and ballot process, and all compliance steps under Proposition 218. She will conduct a detailed review of the assessment methodology, benefit findings, and ballot materials to ensure accuracy and consistency. Susan has been with SCI since 2006 and holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Master of Science in Organizational Development from Sonoma State University.

Heather Jamison, Consultant, will serve as Outreach Consultant for the period before and during the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings. She will assist with the preparation of clear public information materials, support communication with property owners, and help coordinate outreach efforts during the mailed ballot period.

Heather brings over a decade of experience in stakeholder engagement and holds a Bachelor’s degree from California State University, Sacramento.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 140 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 11 of 12 ends

FEE SCHEDULE AND MANNER OF PAYMENT
In consideration of the work accomplished, as outlined in the Work Plan, SCI shall be compensated as detailed below. Our professional fees are based on our understanding of the City’s needs and the level of effort we expect to be necessary to complete the Work Plan successfully.

It is important to note that the proposed fees assume both assessment measures will be completed concurrently. If the work proceeds separately, revised fees will be necessary.

TASKS 1,2 FEE
Task 1: Discovery and Assessment Review $8,000 Fixed
Task 2: Informed Outreach Presentation $22,600 Fixed
Task 3: Initial Planning and Preliminary Assessment Engineering $14,400 Fixed Task 4: Assessment Engineering and Engineer’s Reports (2) $37,700 Fixed Task 5: Non-Advocacy Informational Outreach Services $12,500 Fixed Task 6: Proposition 218 Ballot Proceeding Services $23,900 Fixed SUBTOTAL $119,100
Incidental Costs 3 $2,500 NTE
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $121,600
Contingency (5%) 4 $6,080 NTE
TOTAL AUTHORIZATION (including contingency) 1,3 $127,680 As necessary and at the City's discretion, SCI will attend additional in-person meetings at the inperson meeting rate of $1,120 per consultant per meeting for the duration of the Work Plan. All other project meetings, stakeholder outreach meetings, and presentations will be conducted remotely via video or voice conference. Video and voice conferences are not considered in-person meetings in the Work Plan.
2 SCI shall submit an invoice upon completion of each task, with payment due upon receipt. For Task 4, which includes all direct costs for printing, addressing, mailing, and postage, SCI will invoice 30% of the task fee in advance to cover required deposits. This advance payment must be received prior to mailing the notice and ballots.
3 Customary incidental expenses, including travel, lodging, printing, postage, data, or other out‐of‐ pocket costs, shall be reimbursed at actual cost plus 10% not to exceed $2,500, without prior authorization from the City. Mileage expenses shall be billed at the IRS‐approved rate. 4 A five percent contingency is included for potential additional work that may arise during the project, which is not anticipated. This amount is not part of the proposed cost and would be used only at the City’s discretion and with written authorization for activities such as additional inperson meetings, expanded non-advocacy informational outreach, or other out-of-scope services.

All costs in this Work Plan may be funded or reimbursed from the assessment levies if the measures are approved.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 141 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 12 of 12 ends

OTHER INFORMATION AND AGREEMENT TERMS
Independent Contractor. SCI shall perform all services included in this proposal as an independent contractor if selected.

Cancellation. The City or SCI may end the engagement without cause with reasonable written notice. In the event that the engagement is canceled, payment shall still be due for all work performed by SCI, including any portion of a task, up to the date of notification of cancellation.

Insurance Requirements. SCI carries professional errors and omissions insurance in the amount of $2 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate. SCI also carries general liability insurance in the amount of $2 million per occurrence and $4 million aggregate. SCI will provide the City with a certificate of insurance upon request.

Indemnification. Pursuant to California Civil Code Section 2782.8, and as a designated design professional, SCI will defend and indemnify the City only for claims arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of SCI in performing the Work Plan.

Conflict of Interest Statements. SCI has no known past, ongoing, or potential conflicts of interest for working with the City, performing the scope of work, or any other service for this project.

Employment Policies. SCI ensures compliance with all civil rights laws and other related statutes.

SCI does not and shall not discriminate against any employee in the workplace, against any applicant for such employment, or against any other person because of race, religion, sex, color, national origin, handicap, age, or any other arbitrary basis.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 142 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Total AD 20 AD 22
Task 1 Discovery $8,000 $5,200 $2,800
Task 2 Outreach $22,600 $15,820 $6,780
Task3 Initial planning, preliminary $14,400 $10,080 $4,320 Task4 ER $37,700 $20,735 $16,965
Task 5 Proposition 218 Ballot Outreach $12,500 $7,500 $5,000 Task 6 Balloting $23,900 $16,730 $7,170
$119,100 $76,065 $43,035
Incidental Costs $2,500 $1,875 $625
$121,600 $77,940 $43,660
Contingency $6,080 $3,952 $2,128
$127,680 $81,892 $45,788
City of Pleasant Hill Assessment Engineering, Proposition 218 Balloting Services Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 143 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the day of February 18, 2026, by and between the City of Pleasant Hill ("City") and SCI Consulting Group, ("Consultant").

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and
B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall furnish the services listed on Exhibit A in a professional manner.

2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until all authorized work is approved by the City. All such work shall be completed no later than June 30, 2027.

3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed $81,892 without additional authorization from the City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment.

4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit a monthly billing to City describing the work performed. Consultant's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the invoice by City staff. When payments made by City equal 90% of the maximum fee provided for in this Agreement, no further payments shall be made until the final work under this Agreement has been accepted by City.

5. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notes and internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. Any modifications made by the City or any agents of the City, to any of the Consultant’s documents or any partial use or reuse of the documents without the express written consent of the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and

EXHIBIT B
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 144 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 2 without liability to the Consultant.
6 Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City's employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights.

7. Interest of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant will not:
a. make a governmental decision whether to:

1. approve a rate, rule, or regulation;

2. adopt or enforce a law;

3. issue, deny, suspend, or revoke any permit, license, application, certificate, approval, order, or similar authorization or entitlement;

4. authorize the City to enter into, modify, or renew a contract provided it is the type of contract that requires agency approval;

5. grant City approval to a contract that requires agency approval and to which the City is a party, or to the specifications for such a contract;

6. grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study, or similar item;

7. adopt, or grant City approval of, policies, standards, or guidelines for the agency, or for any subdivision thereof; or
b. serve in a staff capacity with the City and in that capacity participate in making a governmental decision as defined in 2 California Code of Regulations (“C.C.R”) § 18704(a) and (b) or perform the same or substantially all the same duties for the City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in the City’s Conflict of Interest Code under 2 C.C.R. § 87302. (2 C.C.R. § 18700.3.) Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 145 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 3 8. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise.

9. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all related costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the performance of services under this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers.

To the extent that the Consultant’s services are subject to California Civil Code 2782.8, the above indemnity and duty to defend shall be limited to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8.

10. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies. To the extent that any portion of the following requirements are satisfied through excess or umbrella coverage, such coverage shall be maintained on the same terms as are required for the primary policies under this Agreement.
i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or nonrenewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City.
ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 146 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 4 iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence.
iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per occurrence basis.
b. Policy Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. The City of Pleasant Hill, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.

If Company maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums specified herein, City shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Company. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.
iv. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
v. If the insurance required to be provided by this policy is suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits, Consultant shall notice City in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such action described above. If less than thirty (30) days’ notice is provided to Consultant, Consultant shall notify City immediately of such action.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 147 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 5 c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. e. Wasting Policies. No policy required herein shall include a “wasting” policy limit (i.e. limit that is eroded by the cost of defense).
f. Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer or contractor may require from Consultant by virtue of the payment of any loss.

Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsements that may be necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

11. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations.

12. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Pleasant Hill business license.

13. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Contra Costa, Martinez, California.

14. Written Notification. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice, demand, etc. shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth herein below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of Pleasant Hill
C/O Ann James
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3323
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 148 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 6 If to Consultant: SCI Consulting Group
C/O John Bliss, P.E.
4745 Mangels Blvd.

Fairfield, CA 94534

15. Consultant's Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall.

Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor-in-interest.

16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

17. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

18. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder.

19. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 149 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 7 discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees.

20. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

21. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law.

22. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon fifteen days' written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL: CONSULTANT:
__________________________ By:

Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager
Title: President
Business License #GENL-047336
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________ __________________________
Janet E. Coleson, City Attorney Lyone Conner, City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit A – Scope of Services and Compensation Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 150 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Submitted via Email
Ann James [email protected]
City of Pleasant Hill
Attn: Ann James, Public Works Director
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3323
Re: Proposal for Assessment Engineering, Proposition 218 Balloting Services, and Related Professional Consulting Services
Dear Ms. James:

SCIConsultingGroup (“SCI”) is pleased to submit this proposal to provide Assessment Engineering, Proposition 218 Balloting Services, and Related Professional Consulting Services to the City of Pleasant Hill (“City”) for the proposed new assessment measures for Assessment District No. 20 (Commercial Area Landscape and Lighting) and Assessment District No. 22 (Landscape and Streetlighting Maintenance District). This scope includes preparation of new engineers’ reports, all required assessment engineering, and a clear, non-advocacy informational outreach program to support the City through each phase of the Proposition 218 process.

This proposal outlines a structured, evidence-based approach that integrates discovery, assessment engineering, and non-advocacy informational outreach. Our goal is to support the City with a legally defensible assessment structure and a transparent process that provides property owners with clear and accessible information.

Based on our preliminary discussions with the City, our proposal is organized into the six tasks outlined below. These tasks reflect SCI’s recommended approach to support the City from early evaluation through final Proposition 218 balloting.

Task 1: Discovery and Assessment Review. This task involves evaluating the 2024 ballot outcome, reviewing available materials, and identifying the concerns, informational gaps, and zone-specific issues that should guide the City’s next steps.

Task 2: Informed Outreach Preparation. This task involves developing a targeted, factual, informational outreach strategy based on the findings from Task 1, including zone-specific communication and dedicated outreach for key property-owner groups.

Task 3: Initial Planning and Preliminary Assessment Engineering. This task involves early project planning and preliminary assessment engineering to establish the framework and foundation for potential assessment measures.

EXHIBIT A
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 151 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 2 of 12 ends

Task 4: Assessment Engineering and Engineer’s Reports. This task involves developing the final assessment methodology, determining the specific proposed assessment for each parcel, preparing the Engineer’s Reports, and finalizing the assessment measures and messaging plans for each.

Task 5: Non-Advocacy Property-Owner Informational Outreach Services. To ensure a successful outcome, we will advise and support the City with non-advocacy informational outreach before and during the ballot proceeding, providing the public with clear and accurate information about the proposed assessment measures.

Task 6: Proposition 218 Ballot Proceeding Services. We will assist and fully support the City with the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings. This includes preparing all necessary resolutions, designing, mailing, and tabulating official notices and assessment ballots, as well as conducting the public ballot tabulations.

We look forward to this opportunity to assist the City with this important project and stand ready to proceed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at 707-430-4300 and [email protected]. Melanie Lee can be reached at 707-430-4300 ext. 120 and [email protected]
Sincerely,
John W. Bliss, P.E., President
SCI Consulting Group
cc: Melanie Lee, SCI Consulting Group
Heather Jamison, SCI Consulting Group
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 152 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 3 of 12 ends

WORK PLAN AND APPROACH
SCI proposes a phased, collaborative approach that moves from an early understanding of the 2024 outcome through assessment engineering to final Proposition 218 balloting. Each task builds on the prior task, ensuring a consistent progression that integrates discovery, technical analysis, and factual informational outreach. Our process is designed to reduce demands on City staff while providing legally defensible work products that meet all requirements of Proposition 218.

TASK 1: DISCOVERY AND ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Before moving toward a future Proposition 218 effort, the City will benefit from a clear and objective understanding of the factors that affected the 2024 ballot outcome and the current perspectives of property owners in AD No. 20 and AD No. 22. This diagnostic phase establishes the factual foundation needed to guide assessment structure development and future informational outreach.

SCI will analyze 2024 ballot return patterns and participation rates, including zone level voting results and turnout trends. Staff will also review protest letters, correspondence, meeting notes, and prior informational materials to identify the themes, concerns, and informational gaps that may have influenced the prior result. In addition, SCI will perform a preliminary review of past informational messaging to evaluate clarity, identify areas for refinement, and determine which topics may require enhanced explanation for property owners.

Findings from Task 1 will directly inform the outreach preparation in Task 2 and the preliminary engineering work in Task 3.TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Information and data request list
▪ Project kickoff meeting (Virtual)
▪ Project timeline
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ 15–20 stakeholder interviews with property owners, HOA representatives, and business leaders
▪ Obstacles and Opportunities Assessment Memorandum (MS Word / PDF) ▪ 2024 Assessment Outcome Analysis Memorandum (MS Word / PDF) ▪ Stakeholder Interview Summary (MS Word / PDF)
TASK 2: INFORMED OUTREACH PREPARATION
Task 2 builds on the diagnostic findings from Task 1 and focuses on developing the components of a factual, legally compliant informational outreach program for later use in a future Proposition 218 process. SCI will prepare an outreach strategy tailored to the characteristics of each district zone and the informational needs of the various groups of property owners. This will include zone specific approaches where additional clarification may be warranted, and dedicated informational guidance for condominium owners and recently added residential parcels.

As part of this preparation work, SCI will draft factual informational materials, design a digital survey to gather additional community input (if requested by the City), and prepare content for use on a project website or Local Input page. While Task 2 focuses on preparation, certain outreach activities Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 153 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 4 of 12 ends

included in the deliverables may be conducted during this phase as part of the City’s effort to ensure transparency and gather early feedback to shape the next Proposition 218 process. Full implementation of informational outreach supporting a ballot proceeding will occur later under Task 5, after preliminary assessment engineering is complete.

Local Input is an SCI platform that facilitates community 0engagement and fosters collaboration between local
government, voters, and key stakeholders. Through this
customizable online platform, Local Input enhances
transparency, community participation, and decision-making processes at the local level. This enables voters to become more informed, voice their opinions, contribute ideas, and share feedback regarding a proposed local funding measure.

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ Digital survey and summary of survey results (MS Word / PDF) ▪ Public informational meetings (two virtual; two in-person) ▪ Factual outreach materials, including FAQs, handouts, presentations, and email content (Word / PPT / PDF)
▪ Website or Local Input project page content
▪ Summary of outreach findings and key themes memorandum (MS Word / PDF) TASK 3: INITIAL PLANNING AND PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING Task 3 begins the technical assessment engineering work, informed by the findings from Tasks 1 and

2. SCI will analyze the proposed improvements and services, property ownership characteristics, and district boundaries to establish the framework for the proposed assessment measures. SCI will collect and review property data from the City, the County Assessor, and other sources to confirm parcel characteristics and eligibility. This preliminary engineering work will guide development of the assessment methodology and ensure consistency with the City’s objectives.

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ Assessment Measures Timeline
▪ Preliminary assessment engineering findings
TASK 4: ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING AND ENGINEER’S REPORTS (2) With the discovery, early outreach preparation, and preliminary engineering work complete, Task 4 develops the formal assessment methodology and prepares the Engineer’s Reports required under Proposition 218. The findings from Tasks 1 through 3 ensure that the assessment structure, data assumptions, and supporting documentation reflect the City’s objectives, the characteristics of benefiting parcels, and the information themes identified earlier in the project.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 154 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 5 of 12 ends

If the City proceeds with the formation of the assessment districts, SCI will develop multi-year revenue and expense projections based on City input. These projections will serve as the foundation for the budgets and cost estimates included in the Engineer’s Reports. Comprehensive assessment engineering work will involve defining the proportional assessment rate methodology and separating and quantifying both special and general benefits from the proposed improvements and services.

SCI will apply its industry-leading benefit assessment engineering expertise to develop a method that fully complies with the legal and procedural requirements for a new, post-Proposition 218 benefit assessment, including the court’s direction in Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority, Dahms v. City of Pomona, Greene v. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Robert Beutz v. County of Riverside, and other Proposition 218 decisions.

In a review session, SCI will present these fiscal plans, our data review and analysis, and the proposed assessment methodology, levies, and budgets to the City. Issues uncovered by the review will be highlighted, and remedies suggested. After the City and the City’s legal counsel have reviewed the data and information, SCI will prepare Engineer’s Reports that fully meet the requirements of Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”), the Government Code, and other relevant code sections.

The Engineer’s Reports will be prepared by John Bliss, P.E., an assessment engineer with 24 years of extensive assessment engineering experience. The Engineer’s Reports will include a detailed description of the assessment plans for the improvements and services, future capital and facility improvement needs, a detailed cost estimate, an analysis of special and general benefits, the rationale used for the assessment apportionment, the method of assessment apportionment, calculation of the specific proposed assessment amount for each parcel, an assessment diagram, and other elements.

After the Engineer’s Reports have been prepared, they will be reviewed with City staff and, if necessary, shall be revised to reflect any relevant comments or issues identified. SCI shall also finalize the assessment levies, roll, diagram, and other information for preliminary City approval. SCI will also prepare draft resolutions, notices, and other materials and documents required or recommended for the proposed assessment. Such documents shall be finalized in conjunction with the City’s legal counsel. At the culmination of these services, SCI shall present the findings, proposed assessment levies, and the Engineer’s Reports to the City staff and the City Council (“Council”).

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project Meeting (Virtual)
▪ Proposition 218-compliant Engineer’s Reports (PDF)
▪ Draft resolutions and associated agenda reports (MS Word) ▪ Presentation at City Council meeting (In-Person)
TASK 5: NON-ADVOCACY PROPERTY-OWNER INFORMATIONAL OUTREACH SERVICES Effective informational outreach is essential for a successful ballot outcome. Property owners need a clear understanding of the purpose, need, and structure of any proposed assessment measure before they can make an informed decision. When property owners receive straightforward, accessible information about what the measure would fund, why it is needed, and how it would Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 155 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 6 of 12 ends

affect them, they are far more likely to view the proposal with confidence. Conversely, limited information, unanswered questions, or general mistrust can lead to uncertainty and ultimately a no vote.

Under California law, the City may provide informational communications regarding City issues, including assessment measures, so long as those communications remain strictly factual and nonadvocacy. All materials must be objective and balanced, presenting the measure’s purpose, background, and impacts without attempting to influence the outcome.

Task 5 continues the outreach preparation completed in Task 2 and provides property owners with factual and accessible information about the proposed assessment measures during the Proposition 218 process. Task 5 services begin after completion of the preliminary Engineers Reports. SCI will work with the City to develop and implement an informational outreach program that provides property owners with clear and accessible information prior to initiating the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings and throughout the balloting period. This effort will include a nonadvocacy communication strategy tailored to City property owners, identification of informational needs and audiences, key messaging, and a coordinated outreach schedule. SCI will prepare factual materials, including presentations, handouts, brochures, FAQs, email content, and meeting notices, to explain the purpose, structure, and implications of the proposed assessment. The program may also include a digital feedback survey, informational social media posts, and followup emails to help ensure that property owners receive timely information and can request clarification before the ballot is issued.

SCI will use our Local Input platform to house much of this information on a dedicated project page, providing a single, easily accessible location where property owners can review materials, access updates, and submit general feedback.

Task Deliverables:
▪ Project meeting(s) (virtual)
▪ Informational outreach strategy and timeline (MS Word) ▪ FAQ, handouts, slide decks, and related informational materials (Word, PPT, PDF) ▪ Local Input project page
▪ One informational email campaign
▪ Mailers, upon City request and at additional expense
▪ City training on informational outreach versus advocacy (virtual) ▪ Public informational meetings (1 virtual, 1 in-person) ▪ Property owner inquiry support and responses
TASK 6: PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT PROCEEDING SERVICES
Under this task, SCI will manage the entire Proposition 218 mailed ballot proceeding, including the design, production, mailing, and administration of all official assessment notices and ballots to property owners within the proposed Assessment Districts. The official notice, ballot design, and accompanying informational materials are critical to a successful and legally compliant proceeding.

SCI will prepare materials that clearly and accurately explain the purpose and structure of the proposed assessment measures while meeting all constitutional and statutory requirements.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 156 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 7 of 12 ends

Once the draft notice and ballot are prepared, they will be provided to the City and its legal counsel for review and comment. Following the incorporation of all feedback, SCI will oversee the printing, addressing, and mailing of the official notices and ballots. Throughout the balloting process, SCI will assist the City in managing all aspects of ballot administration and communication with property owners. SCI will respond to inquiries regarding ballot content, assessment amounts, and procedures; monitor and research undeliverable ballots; and coordinate with the County Assessor and Recorder’s offices to confirm updated ownership or mailing information. Replacement ballots will be prepared and issued as needed to ensure that every eligible property owner has the opportunity to participate in the proceeding. SCI will also maintain a detailed record of mailed, returned, and replacement ballots to support transparency and accountability.

Additionally, SCI will prepare all necessary resolutions, staff reports, and public hearing materials and will assist the City and its legal counsel in addressing property owner testimony during the hearing. The City Clerk will serve as the official tabulator in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Ballot tabulation will occur at the public hearing, with results announced at the City Council meeting, where the Council may consider levying the assessment if approved. SCI will provide tabulation software, ballot scanners, and established procedures to ensure a transparent and efficient process. SCI’s barcoded ballot identification system will be utilized to maintain the accuracy, integrity, and reliability of the results.

TASK DELIVERABLES:
▪ Project meeting(s) (Virtual)
▪ Official Proposition 218 notice, ballot, and envelopes ▪ Printing, mailing, addressing, and postage for Proposition 218 balloting ▪ City Council meetings (3 In-Person)
▪ Draft resolutions and supporting documents
▪ Balloting process support
▪ Tabulation support

IN-PERSON MEETINGS
The Work Plan includes up to six in-person meetings. All other meetings and presentations with staff, City Committees, City Council, or other related groups will be conducted virtually. If requested by the City, SCI is available to attend additional in-person meetings at our standard in-person meeting rates.

CITY RESOURCES
SCI will carry out all tasks specified in the Work Plan and any other related services, as appropriate.

The City would be responsible for the following:
▪ Periodically meet or participate in video or voice conference calls with SCI as needed. ▪ Provide information and documentation regarding the City’s Master Plan, if available, capital improvement plan, description of services and improvements to be funded by the assessment, the annual revenues needed, and additional data as requested. ▪ Designate a City point of contact with authority to act on its behalf regarding the Work Plan. ▪ Assist with the planning, review, and coordination of action items.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 157 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 8 of 12 ends

TENTATIVE TIMELINE
We understand that the City would like to complete the Proposition 218 ballot proceeding sometime in 2026 or early 2027. At this stage, the overall timeline will remain flexible, with a focus on building a strong foundation for community engagement and ensuring that residents have clear, accessible information throughout the Proposition 218 process.

The preliminary Engineer’s Reports, public outreach, and the ballot proceeding will all be sequenced to support a thoughtful and transparent process. Prior to the kickoff meeting, SCI will work with City staff to outline a proposed schedule, and the final project timeline will be developed collaboratively during that meeting to ensure it aligns with the City’s goals, community needs, and any required coordination steps.

Our approach emphasizes early and ongoing engagement, recognizing that project success depends not just on meeting procedural requirements but also on ensuring residents understand the proposed assessment and feel meaningfully included at every step. If additional time is needed for outreach or stakeholder communication, the ballot proceeding may occur later in 2026 or in early 2027.

ASSESSMENT SUPPORT AND VALIDATION
In the event of a challenge to the assessments, any claims by one or more property owners that they do not receive the special benefits indicated in the Engineer’s Reports, or other allegations challenging the validity of the Engineer’s Reports and its methodology in determining the assessments, SCI will provide any necessary professional assessment engineering assistance to support the assessments at no additional cost to the City.

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Established in 1985, SCIConsultingGroup is a widely recognized public finance consulting firm with leading expertise in helping California public agencies fund essential services and capital improvements. SCI has extensive experience forming and administering landscape, lighting, and maintenance assessment districts throughout California and has guided many public agencies through successful Proposition 218 processes for similar types of benefit assessments.

Our track record speaks for itself. SCI has a proven 90% success rate with local funding measures, including benefit assessments, special taxes, and property-related fees. That success rate increases to 95% when public agencies follow our proven approach, grounded in thoughtful planning, a clear understanding of property owner sentiment, alignment of the measure with the results of a professionally conducted survey, and a well-executed informational outreach effort. This strategic process not only maximizes success but also ensures legal defensibility and builds public trust.

SCI is exceptionally well-qualified to serve as the City’s Assessment Engineer and Proposition 218 consultant for this City-wide benefit assessment district formation. We bring unmatched technical Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 158 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 9 of 12 ends

and legal expertise, including in-depth experience applying Proposition 218 requirements and related case law to ensure compliance, transparency, and defensibility. Our qualifications include:
▪ Serving California public agencies for four decades.
▪ Administers over 1,000 assessments, special taxes, and fees for more than 200 public agencies annually.
▪ The most comprehensive Proposition 218 expertise in the State, including deep knowledge of benefit analysis, general benefit calculations, and assessment apportionment. ▪ Proven record of forming and administering hundreds of benefit assessment districts statewide.
▪ Extensive experience working with public agencies throughout Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, including the Cities of Richmond, Walnut Creek, Lafayette, Berkeley, Hayward, Oakland, and Pleasanton. County clients include the County of Contra Costa and Alameda County. School district clients include Lafayette School District, Martinez USD, Walnut Creek School District, West Contra Costa USD, Alameda USD, Dublin USD, Hayward USD, San Leandro USD, San Lorenzo USD, and Albany USD. Additional clients include Bethel Island MID, Pleasant Hill RPD, RD 2029, AC Transit, Alameda County MVCD, Washington Township Health Care District, and the Alameda County Household Hazardous Waste Program.
▪ Active members and frequent presenters at conferences and workshops hosted by the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (“CSMFO”), California Special Districts Association (“CSDA), and other professional organizations. ▪ Longstanding relationships with our clients reflect our commitment to providing the highest level of service.

Client references are available on request.

PROJECT TEAM
If selected for the project, SCI will assign a highly qualified and experienced team to support the City throughout the Proposition 218 benefit assessment process. Together, the project team brings more than 69 years of cumulative experience in assessment engineering, ballot proceedings, and Proposition 218 compliance for California public agencies. The roles and brief biographies of the proposed project team members are provided below.

Melanie Lee, Senior Consultant, will serve as Project Manager for the Proposition 218 benefit assessment measure. She will coordinate all phases of the project, oversee preparation and quality control of parcel data, support development of the assessment methodology, and manage all informational materials and project deliverables. Melanie has more than 16 years of experience managing local revenue measure projects, benefit assessment formations, and public communication programs for California public agencies. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration from St. Mary’s College of California.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 159 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 10 of 12 ends

John Bliss, President, P.E., License No. C052091, will serve as the Assessment Engineer of Work. He will be responsible for preparing the Engineer’s Reports and providing assessment engineering services in compliance with Proposition 218 requirements. John has been with SCI for over 24 years and has served as the responsible Assessment Engineer on more than 300 Engineer’s Reports for new or increased assessments. He is a licensed Professional Civil Engineer in the State of California and has extensive experience in special and general benefit analysis, database design, cost estimating, and revenue measure formation. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Brown University and a Master’s in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley.

Susan Barnes, Vice President, will serve as Principal in Charge, providing seniorlevel oversight throughout the preparation of the Engineer’s Reports, the mailed notice and ballot process, and all compliance steps under Proposition 218. She will conduct a detailed review of the assessment methodology, benefit findings, and ballot materials to ensure accuracy and consistency. Susan has been with SCI since 2006 and holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Master of Science in Organizational Development from Sonoma State University.

Heather Jamison, Consultant, will serve as Outreach Consultant for the period before and during the Proposition 218 ballot proceedings. She will assist with the preparation of clear public information materials, support communication with property owners, and help coordinate outreach efforts during the mailed ballot period.

Heather brings over a decade of experience in stakeholder engagement and holds a Bachelor’s degree from California State University, Sacramento.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 160 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 11 of 12 ends

FEE SCHEDULE AND MANNER OF PAYMENT
In consideration of the work accomplished, as outlined in the Work Plan, SCI shall be compensated as detailed below. Our professional fees are based on our understanding of the City’s needs and the level of effort we expect to be necessary to complete the Work Plan successfully.

It is important to note that the proposed fees assume both assessment measures will be completed concurrently. If the work proceeds separately, revised fees will be necessary.

TASKS 1,2 FEE
Task 1: Discovery and Assessment Review $8,000 Fixed
Task 2: Informed Outreach Presentation $22,600 Fixed
Task 3: Initial Planning and Preliminary Assessment Engineering $14,400 Fixed Task 4: Assessment Engineering and Engineer’s Reports (2) $37,700 Fixed Task 5: Non-Advocacy Informational Outreach Services $12,500 Fixed Task 6: Proposition 218 Ballot Proceeding Services $23,900 Fixed SUBTOTAL $119,100
Incidental Costs 3 $2,500 NTE
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $121,600
Contingency (5%) 4 $6,080 NTE
TOTAL AUTHORIZATION (including contingency) 1,3 $127,680 As necessary and at the City's discretion, SCI will attend additional in-person meetings at the inperson meeting rate of $1,120 per consultant per meeting for the duration of the Work Plan. All other project meetings, stakeholder outreach meetings, and presentations will be conducted remotely via video or voice conference. Video and voice conferences are not considered in-person meetings in the Work Plan.
2 SCI shall submit an invoice upon completion of each task, with payment due upon receipt. For Task 4, which includes all direct costs for printing, addressing, mailing, and postage, SCI will invoice 30% of the task fee in advance to cover required deposits. This advance payment must be received prior to mailing the notice and ballots.
3 Customary incidental expenses, including travel, lodging, printing, postage, data, or other out‐of‐ pocket costs, shall be reimbursed at actual cost plus 10% not to exceed $2,500, without prior authorization from the City. Mileage expenses shall be billed at the IRS‐approved rate. 4 A five percent contingency is included for potential additional work that may arise during the project, which is not anticipated. This amount is not part of the proposed cost and would be used only at the City’s discretion and with written authorization for activities such as additional inperson meetings, expanded non-advocacy informational outreach, or other out-of-scope services.

All costs in this Work Plan may be funded or reimbursed from the assessment levies if the measures are approved.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 161 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill
February 18, 2026

Page 12 of 12 ends

OTHER INFORMATION AND AGREEMENT TERMS
Independent Contractor. SCI shall perform all services included in this proposal as an independent contractor if selected.

Cancellation. The City or SCI may end the engagement without cause with reasonable written notice. In the event that the engagement is canceled, payment shall still be due for all work performed by SCI, including any portion of a task, up to the date of notification of cancellation.

Insurance Requirements. SCI carries professional errors and omissions insurance in the amount of $2 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate. SCI also carries general liability insurance in the amount of $2 million per occurrence and $4 million aggregate. SCI will provide the City with a certificate of insurance upon request.

Indemnification. Pursuant to California Civil Code Section 2782.8, and as a designated design professional, SCI will defend and indemnify the City only for claims arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of SCI in performing the Work Plan.

Conflict of Interest Statements. SCI has no known past, ongoing, or potential conflicts of interest for working with the City, performing the scope of work, or any other service for this project.

Employment Policies. SCI ensures compliance with all civil rights laws and other related statutes.

SCI does not and shall not discriminate against any employee in the workplace, against any applicant for such employment, or against any other person because of race, religion, sex, color, national origin, handicap, age, or any other arbitrary basis.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 162 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Total AD 20 AD 22
Task 1 Discovery $8,000 $5,200 $2,800
Task 2 Outreach $22,600 $15,820 $6,780
Task3 Initial planning, preliminary $14,400 $10,080 $4,320 Task4 ER $37,700 $20,735 $16,965
Task 5 Proposition 218 Ballot Outreach $12,500 $7,500 $5,000 Task 6 Balloting $23,900 $16,730 $7,170
$119,100 $76,065 $43,035
Incidental Costs $2,500 $1,875 $625
$121,600 $77,940 $43,660
Contingency $6,080 $3,952 $2,128
$127,680 $81,892 $45,788
City of Pleasant Hill Assessment Engineering, Proposition 218 Balloting Services Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 163 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: March 2, 2026
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
TITLE: INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. __ AMENDING CHAPTER 15.05,

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROL, OF

THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A

REQUIREMENT FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF

DEVICES TO CAPTURE TRASH, LITTER, AND OTHER
POLLUTANTS FROM ENTERING THE CITY’S STORM DRAIN
SYSTEM

SYNOPSIS
The San Francisco Bay Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP), originally adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board in 2009, establishes annual stormwater treatment requirements that must be met by cities, counties, and flood control districts across the San Francisco Bay Area. The MRP has been reissued twice since its inception, and each version has increased its regulatory compliance measures. Provision C.10 of the MRP requires Permittees (cities, counties, and flood management agencies) to implement control measures and actions that reduce trash discharges in stormwater to meet the permit’s discharge prohibitions and receiving water limitations for trash.

To ensure full compliance with provision C.10 of the MRP3.0, staff requests that Council introduce an ordinance amending Chapter 15.05 (Stormwater Management and Discharge Control) of the City of Pleasant Hill Municipal Code, to add a requirement for installation and maintenance of devices for the capture of trash and other pollutants.

DISCUSSION
Background
At the April 7, 2025 City Council Meeting, the City Council received a presentation on the requirements of MRP 3.0, which included Trash Load Reduction (Provision C.10). The core intent of Provision C.10 is to systematically reduce trash pollution in stormwater runoff through measurable, tracked actions and to ensure municipal storm systems are progressively minimizing trash loads reaching creeks, San Francisco Bay, and other receiving waters.

Item 10.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 164 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Under MRP 3.0, permittees were required to reduce trash from 2009 baseline levels to 100% reduction by June 30, 2025. The City of Pleasant Hill’s trash load reduction was 87.3%, which is

12.7% below the required compliance level. These benchmarks are shown on the attached trash management area map (Attachment A), which measures our progress through the end of the reporting cycle.

The Regional Water Quality Control Board is mandating permittees that did not attain 100% trash load reduction to submit an implementation plan and schedule of additional trash load reduction control actions that will attain this goal. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in enforcement action by the Water Board, including fines of up to $10,000 per day.

Three new developed parcels (since June 30, 2025) Taco Bell, Kid Time and Snooker Billiards, are in the process of converting to full trash capture, bringing our trash capture percentage to approximately 90%, still short of the MRP 3.0 required 100%, requiring the City to find alternate means to obtain compliance.

Currently, there is one commercial, high-trash-generating parcel along the north side of Contra Costa Boulevard (552 Contra Costa Boulevard) and four moderate-trash-generating parcels (520, 555, 635, and 675 Contra Costa Boulevard). Staff has determined that if these parcels achieve complete trash reduction compliance on site, the City will reach 100% trash reduction.

At this time, staff has no authority to require full on-site trash capture, and typically conditions property owners to install trash capture measures only when a planning or building permit application is submitted. Staff recommends amending the stormwater ordinance to adopt trash capture installation measures.

Analysis
Section 15.05 of the Municipal Code currently requires private property owners that have full onsite trash capture to enter into a long-term covenant or agreement to ensure the operation and maintenance of their full trash capture devices. In order to be compliant with MRP 3.0, staff recommends the ordinance be further amended to include language that mandates installation and maintenance of full trash capture devices by all owners of private parking lots, streets, roads, and drainage facilities within the City to prevent the discharge of trash or other pollutants from private parking lots, streets, roads, and drainage facilities into the public storm drain system. Additionally, failure or refusal to comply with such requirement shall be prohibited and shall constitute a violation of the City’s Municipal Code
Staff recommends the steps listed below:
a. Identification of property owners of parcels located in moderate and high–trashgeneration areas.

Item 10.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 165 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 b. Outreach to property owners regarding the City’s trash reduction requirements, the need for compliance, and the proposed changes to the stormwater ordinance. c. Implementation of proposed Stormwater Management and Discharge Control ordinance after its adoption (introduction at this meeting and adoption proposed on March 16, 2026).

The proposed ordinance (Attachment B) is ready to be introduced (first reading). The adoption (second reading) of the ordinance is scheduled for March 16, 2026, and should it be adopted, will take effect 30 days later on April 15, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
If the City does not take measurable action to achieve 100% trash capture, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) may issue the City a Notice of Violation for not having sufficient legal authority to implement MRP provisions or for not meeting provision C.10 of MRP3.0.

Failure to comply with this requirement could result in enforcement action by the Water Board, including a cease-and-desist order and fines of up to $10,000 per day.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Introduce Ordinance No. __, Amending Chapter 15.05 (Stormwater Management and Discharge Control) to Add a Requirement for Installation and Maintenance of Devices for the Capture of Trash and Other Pollutants.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
None recommended.

ATTACHMENT(S)
Attachment A - Pleasant Hill Full Trash Capture and Trash Management Area Map Attachment B - Ordinance No. ___ Amending PHMC Chapter 15.05 to Require Capture of Trash and Other Pollutant
Prepared by: Laetitia Galeazzi, Senior Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Ann James, Public Works Director
Item 10.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 166 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Approved by: Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager
Item 10.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 167 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Murderers Cre ek
Pine Creek
Tri b ofHidden Val l e y
Trib of Murderers
Trib of Murderers
Trib of Hidden
Valley
Ellinwood Creek
Trib
ofG ray son
Trib ofMurderers
Hi dden Val le yC reek
Trib ofHid den
Valley
Trib of Grayso n
Grayson Creek
Walnut Creek
E
Branch Grayson Creek
E Branch Grayson
Cree k
RAMP
HWY
242
HWY
iron horse P

ROPOSED

STEVENSON DR

SUNNYVALE AVE
M

ERCURYWA Y

JONES R OAD
RD

FIRST AVE
iron h orse

A S HWOO D D
R

KAHRS AVE

COGGINS DR

LAS JUNTAS
PUTNA
M BLVD
RAMP

M ADEI RAWAY

LAS JUNTAS WAY
SANTOS
LN

GEARY RD

NETHERBY
PL

OAK PARK BLVD

ALAN DR
MARCIA
DR

VICKI LN
DEL
REY
ST

ILENE DR
O
A

KVUE RD

CHILPANCINGO PKWY
M

ACALVEY DR

PRICE LN
ELVIA
ST

KIKI DR

BANCROFT RD

WAVERLY RD

HOOVER AVE

SOUTHWIND DR
LO
N

GBRO OK WAY
IRONW
O
OD DR

CENTER AVE

C AMELBACK
RD
GOLF
LINKS
ST

HARRIET DR

ELDERWOOD DR

GERALDINE
DR

BONNIE LN
ARDITH
DR

HIDDENLAKES
DR

STRAND AVE LOC KWOOD LN

WESTOVER DR

GAIL DR

BENHAM DR

MAYHEW WAY

SILVERHILL D R

BOYD RD

DORIS DR
I 680 FWY

VIKING DR

PATTERSON BLVD

AUGUSTINE DR

HA NNAN DR

VIVIAN DR
S
HIRLEY
DR

DORAY DR

DIABLO VIEW RD

BRANDON RD

STONEHEDGE DR
M

AYBELLE DR

ROANOKEDR

ELOISE AVE

HOOKSTON RD

S ANTA CRUZ DR

SHERM AN DR

ECCLESTON AVE
MER

AI N DR

BRIAR DR

F LAMINGOAK DR

SECOND AVE

DONEGAL WAY
M

AUREEN LN

AUDREY LN

PADRE ST
FLA
ME DR
D
O
B
BS D R
WENDY
DR

HAMILTON DR

CHATTSWOOD
DR

HI L LSDALE DR

SOULE AVE
ODIN
DR
C
S
V
T

INE HILL WAY

CIVIC DR

BLUE RIDGE DR

GREENHILLSDR

PLEASANT

OAKS DR

MARY DR

EVELYN DR

MAZIE DR

ELINORADR

RELIEZ VALLEY RD

DEVON AVE

TWINVIEW PL

HARVARD
D
R

GREENW CI H DR CARLOS TC
STIM
EL
DR

RID G E VIE W
DR

TWINVIEW DR

VIA DEL SOL

KAWAI LN

BYRON DR

BEATRICERD
DO
R

OTHY DR
LA

PLAYA DR

TREAT BLVD

MOHR L N

NANCY LN

NORSE DR

BETTY LN
BERRY
D
R

SHAW RD

HALL LN

ROBERTA AVE
APOLLO
WAY
Ca l. Ridi ng &Hiki ng Trl.

SI

ABEL DR

TAYLOR BLVD

S HENANDOAH DR

DIAMOND BLVD

BROOKVIEW
DR

WITHERS AVE
OAK
RD

RY A N DR

APPALACHIAN DR

GRAYSON RD

GLORIA TER

GO LF CLUBRD
RAMONA
DR

HIGH ST
DIAM
OND LN

B EECHWOOD DR

GREGORY LN

PRIM R OSE
DR

WILLOW PASS RD
45 HO
O
K
AVE

COR TSEN RD

PLEASANT HILL RD

CHERRYLN

ALHAMBRA AVE
LUC IN
NL AD

MORELLOAVE

HELEN RD

BANBRIDGE P L

DEL RIO DR

KATHLEEN DR

SANTA LUCIA DR

CLEAVELAND RD

LUCILLE LN SCOTTSD ALERD

VILI WAY

ELLIOT DR
C RO

YDEN DR

POSHARD ST

SURMONT
D
R
I 680 FWY

CONCORD AVE
RUTH
DR

MERIDIAN PARK BLVD

SPRING LAKE DR

ORION LN
PASO
NO
G
AL
JOHN
GLENN
DR
D UKE
CIR

CYNTHIA DR

CLEOPATRA DR

MC NUTT AVE

TURR NI
DR

GALAXY WAY

JONES RD

TONO LN

VESSIN DR

BAYLOR L N

LINDEN D
R

PILLON R EAL

BELLE AVE

BURNETT AVE

ADRIA DR
BUSKIR
K
AVE

VIRGI NIA HILLS DR

BELVA LN
RAM P

MANOR AVE

MONTI C IR

FIRST AVE

DIABLO C T

EL CAJON
M
ARKET
ST

MAXINE DR
R
OSE LN
C
A
R

OLYN DR

BEVERLY DR

JEANETTEDR

HIGHLAND AVE

JENNIE DR

HUDSON AVE

GLORIA DR

JUL IAN W A Y
iron horse

MOHAWK DR

SYLVIA DR

VINCENT
RD

BUTTNER RD

M ANGINI RD

ROGERS AVE
N
MAIN
ST

MARGIE DR

LUELLA DR
IRON

HILL ST

MASEFIELD DR

HAZEL DR

ESTHER DR

PASO NOGAL RD
CA
REY
DR

JEANN E
CI R

KATHRYN DR

TEIGLAND RD
STUBBS
RD
11 2
3 6
1 4
12 8
10 7
14 5
9 PLH-01
PLH-02
Trash Generation Category
Low
Medium
High
Very High
Creek/Shoreline Hotspot
Trash Management Area
Full-Capture Location
Full Trash Capture
Non-Jurisdicational
(Dot color = Generation Category)
Streets
Creeks
Parcel Boundary
Map Matchline
Pleasant Hill Full Trash Capture and Trash Management Area Map 0 0.0750.15 0.3 Miles
9/25/2024
Information contained on these maps is for the
sole purpose of the Contra Costa Clean Water
Program. Accuracy of the data is not guaranteed.

Map Created By CCCWP GIS
Item 10.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 168 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL AMENDING CHAPTER 15.05, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE

CONTROL, OF THE PLEASANT HILL MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A REQUIREMENT

FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF DEVICES TO CAPTURE TRASH, LITTER, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS FROM ENTERING THE CITY’S STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
WHEREAS, Chapter 15.05 of the Pleasant Hill Municipal Code (PHMC) was enacted to fulfill the City of Pleasant Hill’s (City’s) duties regarding stormwater management and discharge control in compliance with the City’s obligations under state and federal law and accompanying permits, specifically provision C.10 of the San Franciso Bay Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP); and
WHEREAS, in order to be in full compliance with provision C.10 of the MRP 3.0, it is necessary to amend Chapter 15.05 to include a provision requiring owners of private parking lots, streets, roads and drainage facilities to install and maintain devices or facilities to capture trash or other pollutants in order to keep such pollutants from entering the City’s stormwater system.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Chapter 15.05.020 of the PHMC is hereby amended to add a definition of “Litter” as follows:
“Litter shall mean, but is not limited to, plastic, paper, cigarette butts, floor sweepings, trash, rubbish, food, cloth, metal, recyclable materials, or waste matter of whatever character when not properly disposed of or managed.”
Section 2. Chapter 15.05.070(D) of the PHMC is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“D. Parking lots, paved areas and related stormwater systems. A person owning, operating or maintaining a paved parking lot, the paved areas of a gasoline station, a paved private street or road, and related stormwater systems shall clean those premises as frequently and thoroughly as practicable in a manner that does not result in the discharge of trash, litter, or other pollutants to the city’s stormwater system. The Director may require installation and maintenance of devices or facilities to prevent the discharge of trash or other pollutants from private parking lots, streets, roads, and drainage facilities into the storm drain system. Failure or refusal to comply with such requirement is prohibited and shall constitute a violation of this chapter.” Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption.

Section 4. Within fifteen days after the passage of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause it or a summary of it to be posted in the three places designated by resolution of the City Council.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the Item 10.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 169 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill held on the 2nd day of March, 2026.

ADOPTED and ordered posted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, held on the day of , 202_, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_______________________________
ZAC SHESS, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
LYONE P. CONNER, City Clerk
Item 10.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 170 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: March 2, 2026
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. __-26 ACCEPTING THE CONTRA COSTA

BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (VIKING DRIVE TO
HARRIET DRIVE) PROJECT NO. 02-23 AS COMPLETE AND

AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO ISSUE AND

RECORD A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY

MANAGER TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT WITH PARK
ENGINEERING INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SERVICES BY $77,954.44

SYNOPSIS
The Contra Costa Boulevard Improvement Project (Viking Drive to Harriet Drive) No. 02-23 constructed "complete streets" enhancements along Contra Costa Boulevard (CCB), between Viking Drive and Harriet Drive to improve access and safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and vehicles along the Project corridor. The contractor, Redgwick Construction Company, has completed all the work to the City’s satisfaction and is requesting final payment for the completed work.

The purpose of this item is to consider the acceptance of the Contra Costa Boulevard Improvement Project (Viking Drive to Harriet Drive) Project No. 02-23 as complete and to authorize the issuance of a Notice of Completion.

DISCUSSION
Background
On April 15, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-24, which awarded the construction contract to Redgwick Construction Company, in the amount of $7,021,589.64, which includes a $6,204,897.00 base bid, Alternative Bid Item 2 for $72,105.00 and a 12% contingency of the base bid in the amount of $744,587.64.

The CCB Improvement Project No. 02-23, was identified in the approved FY 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Plan as a funded project. It provided for “complete streets” enhancements along CCB between Viking Drive and Harriet Drive. Key project elements include modifications to the Item 10.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 171 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 traffic signals and intersection geometry at CCB and Taylor Boulevard, a new traffic signal at CCB and Alan Drive, ADA upgrades, traffic striping modifications, bicycle lanes, median reconfiguration, LED street lighting, and drought-tolerant landscaping. These enhancements greatly improved access and safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users along the CCB project corridor.

A portion of the public improvements at the intersection of Contra Costa Boulevard and Sun Valley Boulevard were within the City of Concord’s right-of-way, and due to the City of Concord’s benefit received from the new traffic signal and intersection modifications being constructed by the project, Concord agreed to pay their “fair share cost” of $440,000.00, for the base bid work within the City of Concord limits. A formal agreement between the City of Concord and the City of Pleasant Hill was finalized, and the City of Concord has reimbursed the City of Pleasant Hill for the work.

The contract documents did not originally identify a new resurfacing treatment as part of the project scope.

During construction staff identified serious deficiencies in the existing asphalt, indicating a rapid deterioration of the roadway. New striping along the project corridor included new bike lanes, green bike markings as well as high visibility crosswalks at the Contra Costa Boulevard/Taylor Boulevard intersection and staff recommended the project limits be resurfaced prior to installing the new roadway striping to maximize the City’s resources and ensure the integrity of the roadway and new striping.

On February 3, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 7-25, approving the resurfacing within the project limits of the CCB Improvement Project, (Viking Drive to Harriet Drive). An appropriation of $1,233,865.00 was authorized from available Street Resurfacing Program funds to the CCB Improvement Project and a change order was issued to Redgwick Construction Company, bringing the total approved project funds to $8,255,454.64. The work was completed in June 2025.

A portion of this change order work on Willow Pass Road (between Contra Costa Boulevard and Santa Monica Drive) is within the City of Concord’s right-of-way. Staff renegotiated the existing agreement to include an additional $140,000.00 for the resurfacing within the City of Concord’s right-of-way. The existing agreement with the City of Concord was amended to include these costs.

Staff identified necessary manhole and valve adjustments within the project limits and notified Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) and Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) of the need to complete the work in conjunction with the resurfacing work being performed with this project. Both CCCSD and CCWD requested that Redgwick perform these utility adjustments and agreed to reimburse the City for the cost of the work. The estimated amount of the combined utility reimbursement is $37,700.00.

Item 10.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 172 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Project highlights included:
 Traffic signal modification at CCB and Taylor Boulevard  Traffic Signal Modification at CCB and Alan Drive
 Remove and replace 18 median streetlights between Harriet Drive and Viking Drive  1,400 tons of Hot Mix Asphalt overlay
 Installed 22 new ADA compliant curb ramps
 Installed 13,500 square feet of new sidewalk
 Repaired 3,466 linear feet of median curb
 Updated thermoplastic pavement markings, reflectors and striping per the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
 Installed CCCSD recycled water line for irrigation
 Rain gauge for irrigation control
 Installed C3.j stormwater management system on the southeast corner of CCB and Taylor Boulevard
Analysis
The CCB Improvement Project is now complete to the satisfaction of the City in accordance with the construction plans and specifications. Project construction began on July 1, 2024, and was substantially completed by December 30, 2025. Final punch list items, including the required landscape maintenance, were completed in January 2026, within the time allotted to the contractor.

The cost of construction (including change orders) is $7,985,694.03, which is under the City Council approved project budget of $8,255,454.64 (3.3%). Change order work totaling $1,418,445.72 included:
 $1,226,093.00 Asphalt repairs and resurfacing within the project limits  $34,724.64 Negotiated change order costs due to PGE schedule conflicts  $53,826.00 Bioretention area at the Southwest corner of CCB and Taylor  $86,743.00 3 ADA curb ramps at Ruth Drive and Taylor Boulevard  $17,059.08 Minor miscellaneous change orders, including concrete and irrigation repairs
The City is retaining $399,284.77 (5% of the construction amount) from Redgwick Construction Company to ensure that all subcontractors and suppliers are paid. The procedure for releasing these monies is for the City Council to formally accept the work and authorize issuance and recordation of a Notice of Completion. If there are no claims filed within 35 days of recording the notice, then payment of the retained amount is made to the contractor. After project acceptance, the City will have a one-year maintenance period with the contractor to address any problems that occur in that Item 10.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 173 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 time frame. New shrubs have a one-year plant establishment period, and new trees have a twoyear tree establishment period.

On May 6, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 27-24, approving a contract with a construction management firm, Park Engineering, Inc. Park Engineering provided a Resident Engineer (RE), an Inspector, and any needed Material Testing. The RE was responsible for project coordination, documentation, and reporting and ensuring construction work stayed on schedule.

The Construction Inspector oversaw the daily operations, and ensured Redgwick’s adherence to the plans and specifications, contractor and public safety, daily reporting, and coordination with the RE and engineering staff. Material testing services were provided for specialty inspections that require equipment or testing beyond what a general construction inspector can perform. The original contract with Park Engineering was in the amount of $400,000; however, due to unexpected utility delays and change orders, there were additional construction management costs in the amount of $77,954.44. The increase in Park Engineering’s construction management costs was not included in the authorized budget. Staff is requesting costs be funded from available project funds.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total project construction cost is $7,985,694.03. The project is funded by $4,792,000 in CCTA grant funds; $778,050 in SB1 funds; $600,000 in Unified Lighting District Funds; $136,139 in Traffic Impact Funds; $118,355 in Traffic Congestion Relief Funds; $943,450.03 in Measure K funds; a $580,000 reimbursement from the City of Concord; and $37,700 in reimbursements from CCCSD and CCWD. The Engineering Division has confirmed with the Finance Division that monies are available to pay for the remaining project retention.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt Resolution accepting the Contra Costa Boulevard Improvement Project (Viking Drive to Harriet Drive) No. 02-23 as complete and authorize the issuance of a Notice of Completion.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
None recommended.

ATTACHMENTS
Item 10.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 174 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 Proposed Resolution
Prepared by: Ann James, Public Works Director
Approved by: Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager
Item 10.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 175 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 RESOLUTION NO. -26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

ACCEPTING THE CONTRA COSTA BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (VIKING DRIVE TO HARRIET DRIVE) PROJECT NO. 02-23 AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING

THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO ISSUE AND RECORD A NOTICE OF

COMPLETION, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT WITH PARK ENGINEERING INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES BY $77,954.44

WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Boulevard Improvement Project (Viking Drive to Harriet Drive) Project No. 02-23 provides modifications to the traffic signals and intersection geometry at Contra Costa Boulevard (CCB) and Taylor Boulevard, a new traffic signal at CCB and Alan Drive, ADA upgrades, traffic striping modifications, bicycle lanes, median re-configuration, LED street lighting, and drought-tolerant landscaping; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to Redgwick Construction Company to perform work described in the contract documents entitled Contra Costa Boulevard Improvement Project (Viking Drive to Harriet Drive) Project No. 02-23; and WHEREAS, the work has been performed to the satisfaction of the City, and Redgwick Construction Company is requesting final payment for the completed work; and WHEREAS, the California Public Contract Code requires the City to notify the public of acceptance of a project prior to making a final payment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill finds that the work performed as Contra Costa Boulevard Improvement Project (Viking Drive to Harriet Drive) Project No. 02-23 is complete to the satisfaction of the City.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill orders that all project streets identified within the project documents are subject to a five-year street pavement moratorium effective the date of this Resolution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill authorizes the City Manager to execute a contract increase from available project funds for Construction Management Services in the amount of $77,954.44 with Park Engineering, Inc. for the Contra Costa Boulevard Improvement Project (Viking Drive to Harriet Drive) Project No. 02-23; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Public Works Director is authorized to execute a Notice of Completion and record it with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within ten (10) days from the date thereof. [Signatures on the Following Page]

Item 10.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 176 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________________
ZAC SHESS, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
LYONE P. CONNER, City Clerk
Item 10.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 177 of 177 - Monday, March 02, 2026

← All documents from this meeting