Element 8 – System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance, and Capital Improvements City of Pleasanton Sewer System Management Plan, July 2025 33 required capacity improvements will be funded and constructed by future develop ers and/or incorporated into the long-term CIP once identified .
8.3.4: Infiltration and Inflow
The hydraulic model was used to evaluate the magnitude of infiltration and inflow (I/I) into the City’s sewer system . Peak I/I flow (for the 25- year design storm) was expressed as a wet weather peaking factor (ratio of peak I/I flow to average dry weather flow) for each flow meter tributary area. The wet weather peaking factors ranged from about 1.5 to 5, with most areas having peaking factors less than 4 . While these values certainly indicate that the system is subject to I/I, the values are lower than man y other San Francisco Bay Area systems . Based on the results of the capacity assessment, the City does not consider I/I to be excessive and warranting a targeted I/I investigation program, but it will continue to monitor flows (at its key pump stations and influent to the DSRSD treatment plant, and through future flow monitoring programs) and re -visit the need for a focused I/I program in the future .
8.4: Impacts of Climate Change
It is generally accepted that storm frequency and intensity will increase in the future as a result of climate change. Already, published rainfall statistics (e.g., NOAA Atlas 14) are likely out-of-date and are currently being updated. NOAA Atlas 15 is anticipated to be released in 2026. At that time, the City will re -evaluate its design storm and make adjustments if warranted in the capacity assessment . The City will continue to monitor conditions in the system during large wet weather events and take future action if observations indicate increased flows or risk of spills due to insufficient capacity during such events.
8.5: Project Funding
The City conducts sewer rate and connection fee studies on a periodic basis to assess the funding needs to support CIP, as well as O&M programs. The next sewer rate and connection fee study is scheduled to be complete as shown in Section 1.2 .
8.6: References
• WDR Attachment – Section 8
• Sewer Capacity Evaluation Report , November 2024
• NOAA Atlas 14
Element 9 – Monitoring, Tracking and Reporting System
City of Pleasanton Sewer System Management Plan, July 2025 34
9.0: Element 9 – Monitoring, Tracking and Reporting
System
The SSMP must include an Adaptive Management section that addresses SSMP implementation effectiveness and the steps for necessary SSMP improvement, including:
a. Maintaining relevant information, including audit findings, to establish and prioritize appropriate Plan activities.
b. Monitoring the implementation and measuring the effectiveness of each element of the Plan.
c. Assessing the success of the preventative operation and maintenance activities. d. Updating Plan procedures and activities, as appropriate, based on monitoring and performance evaluation .
e. Identifying and illustrating spill trends, including spill frequency, locations, and estimated volumes .
9.1: Adaptive Management
The City regularly tracks and updates the performance results of its sanitary sewer program. I n March of each year , the SWRCB requires that the City prepare and submit an Annual Report of its findings in CIWQS. During preparation and prior to certification of the Annual Report, the City will also perform the following related activities:
• Review the SERP for effectiveness and make any changes to ensure proper and timely responses.
• Evaluates the SSMP Audit Report ’s corrective actions to monitor implementation status.
• Report on key performance indicat ors summarized in Table 9 -1 and update performance tracking graphs (see Appendix B).
• Document any required SSMP changes in the SSMP Change Log.
9.2: References
• WDR Attachment D – Section 9
• Appendix B – Spill and Operational Performance Tracking
Element 9 – Monitoring, Tracking and Reporting System
City of Pleasanton Sewer System Management Plan, July 2025 35 Table 9–1: Key Performance Indicator Targets per Calendar Year Key Performance Indicator Target
Regulatory Compliance
• Number of Spills 5
• Spill Reports Completed on Time 100%
• Annual Report Completed on Time 100%
• SSMP Audit Completed on Time 100%
• SSMP Update Completed on Time 100%
Spill Response
Response Time (receipt of call to arrival at site)
• During Business Hours Less than 30 min 95% of the time • After Business Hours Less than 90 min 95% of the time Spill Recovery Volume (average) 75%
Spill Reduction
Number of Repeat Spills 0
Inspections & Maintenance
• Gravity Mains & Manhole Cleaning and Inspections
Completed
7-Year Cycle
(190,000 linear feet/year of piping and
respective manholes)
• Lift Station Inspections Completed 75%
• Force Main Inspections Completed
o Yearly Alignment Walks
o Quarterly Vault/ARVs
100%
75%
• Open vs. Total Work Orders 25%
Element 10 – SSMP Audits
City of Pleasanton Sewer System Management Plan, July 2025 36
10.0: Element 10 – SSMP Audits
The Plan shall include internal audit procedures, appropriate to the size and performance of the system, for the Enrollee to comply with section 5.4 the General Order.
10.1: City SSMP Audit Procedures
The City shall perform internal audits of the SSMP on a triennial (every 3 years) basis per the requirements of the General Order and a certified Audit Report will be completed, certified and uploaded to CIWQS no later than six (6) months following the end of the three- year audit period. If the results of the audit require updates or changes to the sewer program, the content and timeline to complete those change s will be described in the audit correctives action plan , and as the changes are mad e, they will be tracked in the SSMP Change Log.
The milestone for the next SSMP audit is included in Section 1.2.
10.2: References
• WDR Attachment D – Section 10
• SSMP Audit Report : 8/2/21 to 8/2/24
Element 11 – Communication Program
City of Pleasanton Sewer System Management Plan, July 2025 37
11.0: Element 11 – Communication Program
The SSMP must include procedures for the Enrollee to communicate with:
a. The public for spills and discharges resulting in closures of public areas, or that enter a source of drinking water, and t he development, implementation, and update of its Plan, including opportunities for public input to Plan implementation and updates. b. Owners/operators of systems that connect into the Enrollee’s system, including satellite systems, for system operation, maintenance, and capital improvement -related activities.
11.1: Communication Program
The SSMP Update shall be adopted by City Council at a City Council meeting prior to upload to CIWQS. To facilitate the City Council meeting , staff will include a draft version of the SSMP and prepare a staff report and presentation that provides background on regulatory requirements, SSMP purpose and content, and relationship to existing City policies and programs. The draft SSMP and staff report will be available to the public through posting of the City Council meeting agenda on the City’s website . The City Council meeting will be open to the public and include a period for public comment. The final and adopted SSMP will incorporate input from the City Council meeting. Any significant changes to the adopted SSMP in the future will be approved by City Council through a s imilar process.
The SSMP Update report (including referenced SERP) that is adopted and uploaded to CIWQS will be posted on the City’s Utilit ies Division webpage (see link in Section 11.2).
Any changes to the SSMP Update report will be made in the report, documented in the SSMP change log, and then reposted to the City’s Utilities Division webpage. Note that unless the changes are significant, the SSMP Update report will not be resubmitted to CIWQS until the next 6-year due date.
Other communication efforts of the sewer program will include annual check -ins with City Council on KPIs, and public outreach on SSOs and the sewer pipe blockage control plan as described in those programs.
11.2: References
• WDR Attachment D – Section 11
• Utilities Division Website
Appendix A: SSMP City Council Adoption Documents
RESOLUTION NO. 2025- 036
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON TO APPROVE THE 2025 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton owns and operates a sewer collection system; and WHEREAS. the State Water Resources Control Board on December 6, 2022. adopted the Statewide Waste Discharge Requirements General Order WQ 2022- 0103- DWQ ( Order), which became effective June 5. 2023 and established updated regulatory requirements for sewer collections systems within California; and
WHEREAS. the Order requires the preparation of a Sewer System Management Plan SSMP) by all agencies enrolled under the Order:
WHEREAS, the Order requires that the SSMP be approved by the governing body of the agency at a public meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING:
SECTION 1. The City of Pleasanton approves the 2025 SSMP.
SECTION 2. The City' s Legally Responsible Official, as designated in the SSMP. is authorized to submit the SSMP to the State Water Resources Control Board.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on June 17. 2025
I. Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton. California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 17' day of June 2025, by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher. Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
I- L ,A
J e yn Kw g,
6ty
Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
Appendix B: Spill and Operational Performance Tracking
Spill Performance Results
5 53214 4543473 3 3120123456782008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Annual Spill Events 0123456782008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Annual Spills by Spill CategoryCat 1Cat 2Cat 3Cat 4
0123456782008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Annual Spills by CauseRootsGreaseDebrisother 0200040006000800010000120002008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Comparison of Annual Spill Volumes, Recovered and to WatersSpill VolumeRecovered VolVolume to waters
5863292810035178379831175787235498034510 063809162876882420924510204060801001202008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Pwecentage of Annua; Spill VolumeComparison of Receovered versus To WatersPercent RecoveredPercent to Waters2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Pleasanton1.92 1.92 1.15 0.77 0.38 1.54 1.54 1.92 1.54 1.15 1.54 2.69 1.15 1.15 0.77 0.38 0.77State6.16 5.81 5.33 5.06 4.97 4.86 5.08 4.41 4.05 3.62 3.22 3.24 4.02 3.59 1.67 3.29 1.37RWQCB210.71 9.53 8.36 7.62 6.79 5.77 6.5 4.86 5.21 4.88 3.84 4.23 3.18 4.66 1.87 3.06 1.93024681012Annual Comparison of SSO Rate/100 Miles
Operational Performance Results
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Pleasanton1.92 1.92 1.15 0.77 0.38 1.54 1.54 1.92 1.54 1.15 1.54 2.69 1.15 1.15 0.77 0.38 0.77State6.16 5.81 5.33 5.06 4.97 4.86 5.08 4.41 4.05 3.62 3.22 3.24 4.02 3.59 1.67 3.29 1.37RWQCB210.71 9.53 8.36 7.62 6.79 5.77 6.5 4.86 5.21 4.88 3.84 4.23 3.18 4.66 1.87 3.06 1.93024681012Annual Comparison of SSO Rate/100 Miles - 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,0002011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Calendar Year Line Cleaning, Linear Feet
6%2%6%4%2%1%7%5%2%2%13%16%8%16%3%0%2%4%6%8%10%12%14%16%18%2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Calendar Year Line Cleaning, Percent of System - 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,0002011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Calendar Year CCTV, Linear Feet
5%4%2%5%2%1%2%3%0%0%7%11%8%30%2%0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Calendar Year CCTV, Percent of the System
Appendix C: SSMP Change Log
SSMP CHANGE LOG
Date SSMP
Element # Description of Change / Revision Made
Person
Authorizing
Change
woodardcurran.com
City of Pleasanton Sewer Capital Implementation Plan20-Year Plan -- Scenario 1 Maintain Long Term
Capital Projects Notes Estimated Total
Capital Cost FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 FY 35/36 - FY 44/45
Existing
Customers
Future
Customers
Priority A - Capacity & Reliability Improvement Projects Project 1B: Upsize Sunol Blvd Sewers preferred alt $1,600,000 790,000$ 810,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,600,000 $ -$ Project 2A: Bernal Ave Pipe Bridge preferred alt $3,330,000 -$ 400,000$ 2,930,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,330,000$ -$ Project 3: Upsize Pipes downstream of Stoneridge Mall
$3,660,000 -$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$ -$
-$
-$
-$
3,660,000$
Project 4A: East Pleasanton Capacity Project A (Kiewit and Arroyo Lago) Note 1 $2,972,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ 222,275$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 222,275$ 2,749,725$ Project 4B: East Pleasanton Capacity Project B (Amazon, East Lakes, Site H)
Note 2 $4,314,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,314,000$ Priority A - Lift Station Projects
LS-02, -07, -08, -10 Improvements Note 3 $1,420,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,420,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,420,000 $ -$ LS-04, -12, -13, -15 Improvements Note 3 $940,000 -$ -$ 470,000$ 470,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 940,000$ -$ LS-05 Full Replacement Project Note 4 $6,120,000 -$ -$ 810,000$ 5,310,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,120,000$ -$ EARS and EALS Condition Assessment, Capacity Evaluation, and Predesign $500,000
166,700$ 166,700$ 166,700$ -$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
500,000$ -$
Generator Replacement - Sewer and Storm Note 5 $9,860,000 150,000$ 1,710,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 9,860,000$ -$ Priority A - Condition Assessment Projects
Pipeline Replacement (1-2 mile of system) Note 6 $9,500,000 -$ 500,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,500,000$ -$ Amberwood Siphon
$3,330,000 -$
270,000$ 3,060,000$ -$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$ -$
3,330,000$ -$
Priority A - Annual Sewer System Improvements for Resurfacing $1,400,000 -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ -$ -$
-$ -$
-$
-$
1,400,000$ -$
Large Diameter Inspection Study $150,000 -$
150,000$ -$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
150,000$ -$
Denker Road Sewer Replacement $1,650,000 150,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
1,650,000$ -$
Cathodic Protection and I&I Studies $150,000 -$
150,000$ -$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$ -$
-$
150,000$ -$
Cathodic Protection Installation $9,000,000 -$
-$
500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 5,000,000$ 9,000,000$ -$
Force Main Desktop Analysis and Inspections $704,000 104,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$
-$
-$
-$
-$ -$
-$
704,000$ -$
$60,600,000 1,360,700$ 6,306,700$ 11,586,700$ 10,630,000$ 7,072,275$ 1,920,000$ 1,500,000$ 3,500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 5,000,000$ 49,876,275$ 10,723,725$ Priority B - Lift Station Projects
Health and Safety Signage $10,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ EALS R&R Note 7 $4,000,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 520,000$ 3,480,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ -$ EARS LS Note 7 $8,412,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,093,560$ 7,318,440$ -$ 8,412,000$ -$ EARS LS Piping Note 7 $1,647,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 214,110$ 1,432,890$ -$ -$ 1,647,000$ -$ LS-03, -09, 11 Abandonment Note 8 $600,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ -$ LS-06 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $2,890,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 375,700$ 2,514,300$ -$ -$ -$ 2,890,000$ -$ LS-08 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $3,120,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 405,600$ 2,714,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,120,000$ -$ LS-07 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $3,700,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 481,000$ 3,219,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,700,000$ -$ Priority B - Condition Assessment Projects
Priority B - Pipeline Replacement (1-2 mile of system) Note 6 $15,000,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ 15,000,000$ -$ Priority B - Large Diameter Pipe and Force Main Rehab Note 10 $6,000,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 6,000,000$ -$ Priority B - Sewer Siphon Replacement Note 10 $3,330,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,330,000$ 3,330,000$ -$ Force Main and Large Diameter Desktop Analysis and Inspections $750,000 -$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
750,000$ -$
750,000$
Priority B - Annual Sewer System Improvements for Resurfacing Note 10 $1,750,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ -$ 1,750,000$ -$ $51,209,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,875,600$ 12,411,100$ 11,297,410$ 5,876,450$ 11,418,440$ 3,330,000$ 51,209,000$ -$ Priority C - Lift Station Projects11
LS-02 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $750,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $750,000 $750,000 -$ LS-04 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $810,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $810,000 $810,000 -$ LS-10 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $880,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $880,000 $880,000 -$ LS-12 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $1,230,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $1,230,000 $1,230,000 -$ LS-13 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $1,150,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $1,150,000 $1,150,000 -$ LS-15 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $710,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $710,000 $710,000 -$ Priority C - Condition Assessment Projects
Force Main and Large Diameter Desktop Analysis and Inspections Note 12 $750,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $750,000 $750,000 -$ Priority C - Pipeline Replacement (1-2 mile of system) Note 6 $30,000,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $30,000,000 $30,000,000 -$ Priority C - Large Diameter Pipe and Force Main Rehab Note 10 $12,000,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $12,000,000 $12,000,000 -$ Priority C - Sewer Siphon Replacement Note 10 $3,330,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $3,330,000 $3,330,000 -$ Project Deferral - Unplanned Repair Costs Note 13 $3,800,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $3,800,000 $3,800,000 -$ Priority C - Annual Sewer System Improvements for Resurfacing Note 10 $3,500,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $3,500,000 $3,500,000 -$ $58,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,910,000 $58,910,000 -$ $1,360,700 $6,306,700 $11,586,700 $10,630,000 $7,072,275 $8,795,600 $13,911,100 $14,797,410 $6,376,450 $11,918,440 $67,240,000 $159,995,275 $10,723,725 Engineering/Administration FTE's Count 1 2 3 3 2 3 4 4 3 3 21 NA NA Engineering/Administration FTE's Cost $300,000 $600,000 $900,000 $900,000 $600,000 $600,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $6,300,000 NA NA Total CIP $1,660,700 $6,906,700 $12,486,700 $11,530,000 $7,672,275 $9,395,600 $14,811,100 $15,697,410 $7,276,450 $12,818,440 $73,540,000 $159,995,275 $10,723,725 Total Priority A Projects
Priority B Projects
Total Priority B Projects
Cost SharingNear Term Mid Term
Priority A Projects
Priority C Projects
Total Priority C Projects
Estimated Total Capital Cost
ATTACHMENT 2
Project: City of Pleasanton Sewer Capital Implementation Plan Capital Improvement Projects
20-Year Plan -- Scenario 1 Maintain
C
apital Improvement Project Notes:
1) Estimated Total Capital Cost is derived from “Table 9: Cost Sharing for Scenario 3 CIP” from the Technical Memorandum dated February 11, 2025 concerning the East Pleasanton Annexation. Costs assume that development of the Kiewit property will contribute $222,275 in payment while balance will be funded by the Arroyo Lago development. 2) Estimated Total Capital Cost is derived from “Table 12: Pro-Rata Cost Sharing Scenario 6 CIP” from the Technical Memorandum dated February 11, 2025 concerning the East Pleasanton Annexation. Costs assume that Project 4B costs will be the Total of all developments (Kiewit North, Site H, East Lakes, Arroyo Lago, and Amazon) minus the Project 4A cost (Kiewit North and Arroyo Lago). The City will seek funding from developments as applications are processed or will seek construction of these projects from the first development with reimbursements made to others on a pro rata share basis as others connect. 3) Priority A Lift Station projects encompass all Criticality 2 and 3 improvements, while Priority B represents Criticality 1 (included in rehabilitation projects), as identified in the 2024 LS Condition Assessment TM. 4) At the time of this project, a redundant siphon will also be installed. Costs include demolition of existing station and assumes full replacement, including cutover costs from the old to new station. 5) Includes all sewer and stormwater generators identified in the TJC Report (2023). 6) Pipeline Replacement includes replacement and repair (R&R) of high priority pipes and an allowance for future R&R work, as well as CCTV inspection and Sewer AI for pipes. This money can also be spent on other high priority assets like force mains, siphons, or large diameter sewers as needed depending on the findings of condition assessment efforts. 7) City funded work to be performed by DSRSD. CIP assumes EALS will be rehabilitated, and the EARS LS and associated piping will be installed to supplement this rehabilitated lift station 8) Estimation of $200,000 for abandonment of Lift Stations currently not in service. 9) Major rehabilitation costs for lift stations were estimated based on the lift station's pump horse power and flow rate. A more refined cost estimate will be developed based on the extent of the rehabilitation required at each station prior to construction.
10) This line item is an allowance for the replacement or rehab of sewer siphons, forcemains, and large diameter sewers that are inspected as part of the Priority A analysis work. This cost will be refined as the analysis is completed 11) LS-14 Rehabilitation will take place under separate CIP funding, and therefore not included in this spreadsheet. 12) The SSMP will make subsequent recommendations about the scope and schedule of future condition assessment work, including CCTV, force main inspection, and manhole inspections. 13) Unplanned repair costs represent the risk associated with deferring capital projects. This cost is intended to account for potential emergency repairs that may arise if assets fail before they can be rehabilitated or replaced. To reflect this risk, a line item equal to 2.5% of City-funded capital projects is included in priority C, but spending would occur whenever an asset fails unexpectedly (in addition to the City’s O&M budget).
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14 CIP Cost ($M)
CIP Implementation - Scenario 1
FTE Priority C Priority B Priority A
City of Pleasanton Sewer Capital Implementation Plan20-Year Plan -- Scenario 2 Projects Funded By Priority Long Term
Capital Projects Notes Estimated Total
Capital Cost FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 FY 35/36 - FY 44/45
Existing
Customers
Future
Customers
Priority A - Capacity & Reliability Improvement Projects Project 1B: Upsize Sunol Blvd Sewers preferred alt $1,600,000 790,000$ 810,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 1,600,000$ -$ Project 2A: Bernal Ave Pipe Bridge preferred alt $3,330,000 - $ 400,000$ 2,930,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 3,330,000$ -$ Project 3: Upsize Pipes downstream of Stoneridge Mall $3,660,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ -$ 3,660,000$ Project 4A: East Pleasanton Capacity Project A (Kiewit and Arroyo Lago) Note 1 $2,972,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 222,275$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 222,275$ 2,749,725$ Project 4B: East Pleasanton Capacity Project B (Amazon, East Lakes, Site H)
Note 2 $4,314,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ -$ 4,314,000$ Priority A - Lift Station Projects
LS-02, -07, -08, -10 Improvements Note 3 $1,420,000 - $ - $ - $ 710,000$ 710,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 1,420,000$ -$ LS-04, -12, -13, -15 Improvements Note 3 $940,000 - $ - $ 470,000$ 470,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 940,000$ -$ LS-05 Full Replacement Project Note 4 $6,120,000 - $ - $ 810,000$ 5,310,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 6,120,000$ -$ EARS and EALS Condition Assessment, Capacity Evaluation, and Predesign $500,000 166,700$ 166,700$ 166,700$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 500,000$ -$ Generator Replacement - Sewer and Storm
Note 5 $9,860,000 150,000$ 1,710,000$ - $ 1,000,000$ 3,000,000$ - $ 1,000,000$ 3,000,000$ - $ - $ -$ 9,860,000$ -$ Priority A - Condition Assessment Projects
Pipeline Replacement (1-2 mile of system) Note 6 $12,900,000 - $ 900,000$ 6,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 12,900,000$ -$ Amberwood Siphon $3,330,000 - $ 270,000$ 3,060,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 3,330,000$ -$ Priority A - Annual Sewer System Improvements for Resurfacing $1,400,000 - $ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 1,400,000$ -$ Large Diameter Inspection Study $150,000 - $ 150,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 150,000$ -$ Denker Road Sewer Replacement $1,650,000 150,000$ 1,500,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 1,650,000$ -$ Cathodic Protection and I&I Studies $150,000 - $ 150,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 150,000$ -$ Cathodic Protection Installation $18,000,000 - $ - $ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 10,000,000$ 18,000,000$ -$ Force Main Desktop Analysis and Inspections $704,000 104,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 704,000$ -$ $73,000,000 1,360,700$ 6,706,700$ 15,086,700$ 11,840,000$ 8,282,275$ 1,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 10,000,000$ 62,276,275$ 10,723,725$ Priority B - Lift Station Projects
Health and Safety Signage $10,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000$ - $ - $ - $ -$ 10,000$ -$ EALS R&R Note 7 $4,000,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 520,000$ 3,480,000$ - $ - $ - $ -$ 4,000,000$ -$ EARS LS Note 7 $8,412,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,093,560$ 7,318,440$ -$ 8,412,000$ -$ EARS LS Piping Note 7 $1,647,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 214,110$ 1,432,890$ - $ -$ 1,647,000$ -$ LS-03, -09, 11 Abandonment Note 8 $600,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 78,000$ 522,000$ - $ -$ 600,000$ -$ LS-06 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $2,890,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 375,700$ 2,514,300$ - $ - $ -$ 2,890,000$ -$ LS-08 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $3,120,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 405,600$ 2,714,400$ - $ - $ - $ -$ 3,120,000$ -$ LS-07 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $3,700,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 481,000$ 3,219,000$ - $ - $ -$ 3,700,000$ -$ Priority B - Condition Assessment Projects
Priority B - Pipeline Replacement (1-2 mile of system) Note 6 $15,000,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ 15,000,000$ -$ Priority B - Large Diameter Pipe and Force Main Rehab Note 10 $6,000,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ - $ - $ -$ 6,000,000$ -$ Priority B - Sewer Siphon Replacement Note 10 $3,330,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 432,900$ 2,897,100$ - $ -$ 3,330,000$ -$ Force Main Desktop Analysis and Inspections Note 11 $750,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000$ -$ 750,000$ -$ Priority B - Annual Sewer System Improvements for Resurfacing Note 10 $1,750,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ -$ 1,750,000$ -$ $51,209,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,275,600$ 12,411,100$ 11,808,310$ 9,295,550$ 11,418,440$ -$ 51,209,000$ -$ Priority C - Lift Station Projects11
LS-02 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $750,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $750,000 $750,000 -$ LS-04 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $810,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $810,000 $810,000 -$ LS-10 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $880,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $880,000 $880,000 -$ LS-12 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $1,230,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $1,230,000 $1,230,000 -$ LS-13 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $1,150,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $1,150,000 $1,150,000 -$ LS-15 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $710,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $710,000 $710,000 -$ Priority C - Condition Assessment Projects
Force Main and Large Diameter Desktop Analysis and Inspections Note 12 $1,500,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $1,500,000 $1,500,000 -$ Priority C - Pipeline Replacement (1-2 mile of system) Note 6 $30,000,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $30,000,000 $30,000,000 -$ Priority C - Large Diameter Pipe and Force Main Rehab Note 10 $12,000,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $12,000,000 $12,000,000 -$ Priority C - Sewer Siphon Replacement Note 10 $3,330,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $3,330,000 $3,330,000 -$ Priority C - Annual Sewer System Improvements for Resurfacing Note 10 $3,500,000 - $ $3,500,000 $3,500,000 -$ $55,860,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,860,000 $55,860,000 -$ $1,360,700 $6,706,700 $15,086,700 $11,840,000 $8,282,275 $7,275,600 $14,411,100 $15,808,310 $10,295,550 $12,418,440 $65,860,000 $169,345,275 $10,723,725 Engineering/Administration FTE's Count 1 2 4 3 3 2 4 4 3 4 21 NA NA Engineering/Administration FTE's Cost $300,000 $600,000 $1,200,000 $900,000 $600,000 $600,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $900,000 $900,000 $6,000,000 NA NA Total CIP $1,660,700 $7,306,700 $16,286,700 $12,740,000 $8,882,275 $7,875,600 $15,611,100 $17,008,310 $11,195,550 $13,318,440 $71,860,000 $169,345,275 $10,723,725 Total Priority C Projects
Estimated Total Capital Cost
Cost Sharing
Total Priority A Projects
Priority B Projects
Total Priority B Projects
Priority C Projects
Near Term Mid Term
Priority A Projects
Project: City of Pleasanton Sewer Capital Implementation Plan Capital Improvement Projects
20-Year Plan -- Scenario 2 Funded By Priority
Capital Improvement Project Notes:
1) Estimated Total Capital Cost is derived from “Table 9: Cost Sharing for Scenario 3 CIP” from the Technical Memorandum dated February 11, 2025 concerning the East Pleasanton Annexation. Costs assume that development of the Kiewit property will contribute $222,275 in payment while balance will be funded by the Arroyo Lago development.
2) Estimated Total Capital Cost is derived from “Table 12: Pro-Rata Cost Sharing Scenario 6 CIP” from the Technical Memorandum dated February 11, 2025 concerning the East Pleasanton Annexation. Costs assume that Project 4B costs will be the Total of all developments (Kiewit North, Site H, East Lakes, Arroyo Lago, and Amazon) minus the Project 4A cost (Kiewit North and Arroyo Lago). The City will seek funding from developments as applications are processed or will seek construction of these projects from the first development with reimbursements made to others on a pro rata share basis as others connect.
3) Priority A Lift Station projects encompass all Criticality 2 and 3 improvements, while Priority B represents Criticality 1 (included in rehabilitation projects), as identified in the 2024 LS Condition Assessment TM.
4) At the time of this project, a redundant siphon will also be installed. Costs include demolition of existing station and assumes full replacement, including cutover costs from the old to new station.
5) Includes all sewer and stormwater generators identified in the TJC Report (2023).
6) Pipeline Replacement includes replacement and repair (R&R) of high priority pipes and an allowance for future R&R work, as well as CCTV inspection and Sewer AI for pipes. This money can also be spent on other high priority assets like force mains, siphons, or large diameter sewers as needed depending on the findings of condition assessment efforts.
7) City funded work to be performed by DSRSD. CIP assumes EALS will be rehabilitated, and the EARS LS and associated piping will be installed to supplement this rehabilitated lift station
8) Estimation of $200,000 for abandonment of Lift Stations currently not in service.
9) Major rehabilitation costs for lift stations were estimated based on the lift station's pump horse power and flow rate. A more refined cost estimate will be developed based on the extent of the rehabilitation required at each station prior to construction.
10) This line item is an allowance for the replacement or rehab of sewer siphons, forcemains, and large diameter sewers that are inspected as part of the Priority A analysis work. This cost will be refined as the analysis is completed
11) LS-14 Rehabilitation will take place under separate CIP funding, and therefore not included in this spreadsheet.
12) The SSMP will make subsequent recommendations about the scope and schedule of future condition assessment work, including CCTV, force main inspection, and manhole inspections.
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14 CIP Cost ($M)
CIP Implementation - Scenario 2
FTE Priority C Priority B Priority A
City of Pleasanton Sewer Capital Implementation Plan20-Year Plan -- Scenario 3 Maximum Deferrals Long Term
Capital Projects Notes Estimated Total
Capital Cost FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 FY 35/36 - FY 44/45
Existing
Customers
Future
Customers
Priority A - Capacity & Reliability Improvement Projects Project 1B: Upsize Sunol Blvd Sewers preferred alt $1,600,000 790,000$ 810,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 1,600,000$ -$ Project 2A: Bernal Ave Pipe Bridge preferred alt $3,330,000 - $ 400,000$ 2,930,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 3,330,000$ -$ Project 3: Upsize Pipes downstream of Stoneridge Mall $3,660,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ -$ 3,660,000$ Project 4A: East Pleasanton Capacity Project A (Kiewit and Arroyo Lago) Note 1 $2,972,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 222,275$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 222,275$ 2,749,725$ Project 4B: East Pleasanton Capacity Project B (Amazon, East Lakes, Site H)
Note 2 $4,314,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ -$ 4,314,000$ Priority A - Lift Station Projects
LS-02, -07, -08, -10 Improvements Note 3 $1,420,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,420,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 1,420,000$ -$ LS-04, -12, -13, -15 Improvements Note 3 $940,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 470,000$ 470,000$ - $ - $ - $ -$ 940,000$ -$ LS-05 Full Replacement Project Note 4 $6,120,000 - $ - $ 810,000$ 5,310,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 6,120,000$ -$ EARS and EALS Condition Assessment, Capacity Evaluation, and Predesign $500,000 250,000$ 250,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 500,000$ -$ Generator Replacement - Sewer and Storm
Note 5 $9,860,000 150,000$ 1,710,000$ - $ 1,000,000$ 3,000,000$ - $ 1,000,000$ 3,000,000$ - $ - $ -$ 9,860,000$ -$ Priority A - Condition Assessment Projects
Pipeline Replacement (1-2 mile of system) Note 6 $6,615,000 - $ 315,000$ 2,100,000$ 2,100,000$ 2,100,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 6,615,000$ -$ Amberwood Siphon $3,330,000 - $ - $ - $ 270,000$ 3,060,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 3,330,000$ -$ Priority A - Annual Sewer System Improvements for Resurfacing $1,050,000 - $ - $ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 1,050,000$ -$ Large Diameter Inspection Study $150,000 - $ 150,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 150,000$ -$ Denker Road Sewer Replacement $1,650,000 150,000$ 1,500,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 1,650,000$ -$ Cathodic Protection and I&I Studies $150,000 - $ 150,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 150,000$ -$ Cathodic Protection Installation $9,000,000 - $ - $ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 5,000,000$ 9,000,000$ -$ Force Main Desktop Analysis and Inspections $704,000 104,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 704,000$ -$ $57,365,000 1,444,000$ 5,585,000$ 6,990,000$ 9,530,000$ 9,232,275$ 2,390,000$ 1,970,000$ 3,500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 5,000,000$ 46,641,275$ 10,723,725$ Priority B - Lift Station Projects
Health and Safety Signage $10,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000$ - $ - $ - $ -$ 10,000$ -$ EALS R&R Note 7 $4,000,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 520,000$ 3,480,000$ - $ - $ - $ -$ 4,000,000$ -$ EARS LS Note 7 $8,412,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,093,560$ 7,318,440$ -$ 8,412,000$ -$ EARS LS Piping Note 7 $1,647,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 214,110$ 1,432,890$ - $ -$ 1,647,000$ -$ LS-03, -09, 11 Abandonment Note 8 $600,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000$ - $ - $ - $ -$ 600,000$ -$ LS-06 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $2,890,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $2,890,000 2,890,000$ -$ LS-08 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $3,120,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,120,000$ 3,120,000$ -$ LS-07 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $3,700,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 481,000$ 3,219,000$ - $ - $ -$ 3,700,000$ -$ Priority B - Condition Assessment Projects
Priority B - Pipeline Replacement (1-2 mile of system) Note 6 $12,500,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ $0 12,500,000$ -$ Priority B - Large Diameter Pipe and Force Main Rehab Note 10 $6,000,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $6,000,000 6,000,000$ -$ Priority B - Sewer Siphon Replacement Note 10 $3,330,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $3,330,000 3,330,000$ -$ Priority B - Annual Sewer System Improvements for Resurfacing Note 10 $1,650,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ -$ 1,650,000$ -$ $47,859,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,370,000$ 7,421,000$ 6,283,110$ 5,376,450$ 10,168,440$ 15,340,000$ 47,859,000$ -$ Priority C - Lift Station Projects11
LS-02 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $750,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000$ $750,000 -$ LS-04 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $810,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 810,000$ $810,000 -$ LS-10 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $880,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 880,000$ $880,000 -$ LS-12 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $1,230,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,230,000$ $1,230,000 -$ LS-13 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $1,150,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,150,000$ $1,150,000 -$ LS-15 Major Rehabilitation Note 9 $710,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 710,000$ $710,000 -$ Priority C - Condition Assessment Projects
Force Main and Large Diameter Desktop Analysis and Inspections Note 12 $750,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000$ $750,000 -$ Priority C - Pipeline Replacement (1-2 mile of system) Note 6 $30,000,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000,000$ $30,000,000 -$ Priority C - Large Diameter Pipe and Force Main Rehab Note 10 $12,000,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 12,000,000$ $12,000,000 -$ Priority C - Sewer Siphon Replacement Note 10 $3,330,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,330,000$ $3,330,000 -$ Project Deferral - Unplanned Repair Costs Note 13 $7,600,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,600,000$ $7,600,000 -$ Priority C - Annual Sewer System Improvements for Resurfacing Note 10 $3,500,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,500,000$ $3,500,000 -$ $62,710,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 62,710,000$ $62,710,000 -$ $1,444,000 $5,585,000 $6,990,000 $9,530,000 $9,232,275 $5,760,000 $9,391,000 $9,783,110 $5,876,450 $10,668,440 $83,050,000 $157,210,275 $10,723,725 Engineering/Administration FTE's Count 1 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 25 NA NA Engineering/Administration FTE's Cost $300,000 $600,000 $600,000 $900,000 $900,000 $600,000 $900,000 $900,000 $600,000 $900,000 $6,900,000 NA NA Total CIP $1,744,000 $6,185,000 $7,590,000 $10,430,000 $10,132,275 $6,360,000 $10,291,000 $10,683,110 $6,476,450 $11,568,440 $89,950,000 $157,210,275 $10,723,725 Total Priority C Projects
Estimated Total Capital Cost
Cost Sharing
Total Priority A Projects
Priority B Projects
Total Priority B Projects
Priority C Projects
Near Term Mid Term
Priority A Projects
Project: City of Pleasanton Sewer Capital Implementation Plan Capital Improvement Projects
20-Year Plan -- Scenario 3 Maximum Deferrals
Capital Improvement Project Notes:
1) Estimated Total Capital Cost is derived from “Table 9: Cost Sharing for Scenario 3 CIP” from the Technical Memorandum dated February 11, 2025 concerning the East Pleasanton Annexation. Costs assume that development of the Kiewit property will contribute $222,275 in payment while balance will be funded by the Arroyo Lago development.
2) Estimated Total Capital Cost is derived from “Table 12: Pro-Rata Cost Sharing Scenario 6 CIP” from the Technical Memorandum dated February 11, 2025 concerning the East Pleasanton Annexation. Costs assume that Project 4B costs will be the Total of all developments (Kiewit North, Site H, East Lakes, Arroyo Lago, and Amazon) minus the Project 4A cost (Kiewit North and Arroyo Lago). The City will seek funding from developments as applications are processed or will seek construction of these projects from the first development with reimbursements made to others on a pro rata share basis as others connect.
3) Priority A Lift Station projects encompass all Criticality 2 and 3 improvements, while Priority B represents Criticality 1 (included in rehabilitation projects), as identified in the 2024 LS Condition Assessment TM.
4) At the time of this project, a redundant siphon will also be installed. Costs include demolition of existing station and assumes full replacement, including cutover costs from the old to new station.
5) Includes all sewer and stormwater generators identified in the TJC Report (2023).
6) Pipeline Replacement includes replacement and repair (R&R) of high priority pipes and an allowance for future R&R work, as well as CCTV inspection and Sewer AI for pipes. This money can also be spent on other high priority assets like force mains, siphons, or large diameter sewers as needed depending on the findings of condition assessment efforts.
7) City funded work to be performed by DSRSD. CIP assumes EALS will be rehabilitated, and the EARS LS and associated piping will be installed to supplement this rehabilitated lift station
8) Estimation of $200,000 for abandonment of Lift Stations currently not in service.
9) Major rehabilitation costs for lift stations were estimated based on the lift station's pump horse power and flow rate. A more refined cost estimate will be developed based on the extent of the rehabilitation required at each station prior to construction.
10) This line item is an allowance for the replacement or rehab of sewer siphons, forcemains, and large diameter sewers that are inspected as part of the Priority A analysis work. This cost will be refined as the analysis is completed
11) LS-14 Rehabilitation will take place under separate CIP funding, and therefore not included in this spreadsheet.
12) The SSMP will make subsequent recommendations about the scope and schedule of future condition assessment work, including CCTV, force main inspection, and manhole inspections. 13) Unplanned repair costs represent the risk associated with deferring capital projects. This cost is intended to account for potential emergency repairs that may arise if assets fail before they can be rehabilitated or replaced. To reflect this risk, a line item equal to 5% of City-funded capital projects is included in priority C, but spending would occur whenever an asset fails unexpectedly (in addition to the City’s O&M budget).
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14 CIP Cost ($M)
CIP Implementation - Scenario 3
FTE Priority C Priority B Priority A
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14 CIP Cost ($M)
CIP Implementation - Scenario Comparison
Scenario 1 - Total Cost Scenario 2 - Total Cost Scenario 3 - Total Cost
1 2025Long-TermSewer CIPCity Council MeetingOctober 21, 2025 OutlinePurpose of Long-Term CIPOverview of Sewer System AssessmentsPrioritization and SchedulingQuestions and discussionsCouncil Action
2 Long-Term CIP Purpose•Develop a "comprehensive" capital improvement program to ensure "long-term" sustainability of sewer system •Inform the upcoming sewer rate study•Comply with new SWRCB General Waste Discharge Requirements Long-Term CIP updates Element 8 of City's 2025 SSMP1. Goals and Introduction2. Organization3. Legal Authority4. Operations & Maintenance Program5. Design and Performance Provisions6. Spill Emergency Response Plan7. Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Plan8.System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance, and Capital Improvements9. Monitoring, Tracking, & Reporting System10. SSMP Audits11. Communication ProgramAppendicesA.Council Adoption DocumentsB.Performance TrackingC.SSMP Change Log
3 Long-Term CIP - ApproachStep 1Identify CIP NeedsLong-Term CIP ReportStep 2Select Implementation TimingSewer Rate StudyStep 3Update SSMPSWRCBChange Log Process Sewer System Description•21,000 service connections•ADWF– 6 mgd•253 miles of gravity pipe•8 siphons•11 lift stations•5 miles of force main
4 Projects Are Based on Various Assessments
Capacity Assessment
2022/2023 Flow Monitoring
Model CalibrationFuture Development
Design Storm Results
5 Gravity System Condition Assessment
Rehab and repair decisions are based on defect codesDuring CCTV, every defect is given a standardized code 30% of system had CCTV data available
Gravity System Condition Assessment
Total CostCost of Pipe R/R Decisions1Risk Priority RatingEstimated CCTV Cost2Defect Point RepairPoint Repair and LineLineReplace$ 945,000 $ 119,000 $ 298,000 $ 298,000 -$ 230,000 High$ 5,005,000 $ 366,000 $ 3,527,000 $ 448,000 $ 462,000 $ 202,000 Medium$ 1,195,000 $ 707,000 $ 488,000 ---Low$ 5,206,000 $ 4,962,000 $ 244,000 ---Very Low$ 12,362,000 $ 6,154,000 $ 4,557,000 $ 757,000 $ 462,000 $ 432,000 Total PipesTotal Length (LF)1Number of PipesRisk Priority RatingTotalNormal PMPipes that Require CCTV DataDefect Point RepairPoint Repair and LineLineReplace18,80074105732-2High77,6004027427439582Medium100,700448194245---Low1,138,0005,7391,6554,0813---Very Low1,334,3006,6631,7584,83650784Total Pipes1,334,300404,900910,80014,8001,8001,700600Total Length (LF)1
6 Lift Station Assessments
Visited every site• LS 5 – Full Replacement• Generators at many stations
7 • Near-term rehab/replacement • Assumed high risk rehab/replacement needs after inspection• Health & Safety Risks• Criteria Violations• High Risk of Failure• Inspection of Critical AssetsCapital improvement projects were grouped by prioritization categories• Equipment nearing end of life, but in good condition• Anticipated work based on ongoing inspection work• PreventativemaintenancePriority Grouping APriority Grouping APriority Grouping BPriority Grouping BPriority Grouping CPriority Grouping C Summary of ProjectsProject PriorityProject TypePriority CPriority BPriority A$ -$ -$ 15,876,000 Capacity Projects$ 5,530,000 $ 24,379,000 $ 18,840,000 Lift Station Projects$ 53,380,000 $ 26,830,000 $ 25,180,000 Condition Assessment Projects$ 58,910,000 $ 51,209,000 $ 59,896,000 Total Project Cost by Priority
8 Three Scenarios with Varying Spend LevelsPriority APriority BPriority CFTELegend Next Steps
9 Where Can You Find Information on the Sewer System?
Where Can You Learn About Sewer Rates?
10 Questions?
In Combination with the SSMP, the Long-Term CIP provides a sustainable approach to managing the City’s Sewer System System Reliability Capacity Management Regulatory Compliance