CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, November 4, 2025
7:00 PM
City Council Chamber
200 Old Bernal Avenue
Pleasanton, CA 94566
The meeting will be held in-person, broadcast live on Channel 29 and streamed live for viewing at the following links TV30 https://www.tri-valleytv.org, the City's website in the Meetings portal (a red dot will indicate a live meeting) https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/, and the City's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheCityofPleasanton.
Public participation: It is requested that members of the public wishing to address the City Council submit a speaker card. When public comment is opened on an agenda item, individuals may speak once per agenda item.
To submit written public comment regarding an open session item on this meeting agenda visit https://forms.cityofpleasantonca.gov/f/writtenpubliccomment. Comments will be accepted by the City Clerk’s Office until 12:00 p.m. on the day of the Council meeting.
In Person at Council Chamber:
• Submit a physical speaker card to the City Clerk at the meeting. When your name is called, please provide comment at the podium.
CALL TO ORDER
• Welcome and Pledge of Allegiance - Cm. Eicher
• Roll Call
Resolution No. 2025-061
Ordinance No. 2302
AGENDA AMENDMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
Items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine in nature and may be enacted by one motion. If discussion is required, that particular item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered separately.
City Manager
1. Approve meeting minutes October 7, 2025
Community and Economic Development
2. Actions of the Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission
3. Public Hearing - Adopt Ordinance No. 2301 an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pleasanton, amending section 5.28.080 system of assessments to permit changes to the manner in which the annual assessment is levied within the
City Council Agenda Page 2 of 3 November 4, 2025
Downtown Pleasanton Business Improvement District, and to levy the annual assessment for 2026
4. Accept the public improvements performed by Columbia Electric for the Valley Avenue and Northway Road Traffic Signal Installation Project, CIP No. 23532, and authorize the return of the remaining project funds to the Gas Tax Fund (Fund 160) and the Traffic Impact Fee Fund (Fund 212)
5. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a fourth amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., for an additional $999,954, for a new total contract amount of $3,995,644, to complete 100 percent design for Phase 2 of the West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project (Owens Drive to Santa Rita Road, CIP No. 26514)
Finance
6. Accept the monthly disbursements and investment report for September 2025 Public Works
MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
7. Presentation by Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District
8. Public Comment regarding items not listed on the agenda – Speakers are limited to 3 minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS
If necessary to ensure completion of the following items, the Mayor may alter time limits.
9. Public Hearing - Hear an appeal of the Planning Commission’s determination and adopt a resolution upholding the approval of an application for Administrative Design Review to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights in the rear yard located at 2207 Martin Avenue, filed under Case No. P25-0236
10. Continued from October 21, 2025 - Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Citygate Associates, LLC for a comprehensive citywide organizational assessment in a not-to-exceed amount of $249,982
11. Continued from October 21, 2025 - Approve the Long-Term Sewer Capital Improvement Plan
MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL
COUNCIL REPORTS
Brief reports on conferences, seminars, and meetings attended by the Council
City Council Agenda Page 3 of 3 November 4, 2025
ADJOURNMENT
Notice
Under Government Code §54957.5, any writings/documents regarding an open session item on this agenda and items received by the City Clerk’s Office by 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting provided to a majority of the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet will be available for public inspection on the City’s website https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/ and also at the Pleasanton Library located at 400 Old Bernal Ave., Pleasanton, CA 94566.
There is a 90-day limit for the filing of a challenge in the Superior Court to certain City administrative decisions and orders, which require a hearing by law, the receipt of evidence, and the exercise of discretion. The 90-day limit begins on the date the decision is final (Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.6). Further, if you challenge an action taken by the City Council in court, you may be limited, by California law, including but not limited to Government Code §65009, to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council prior to or at the public hearing. The City Council may be requested to reconsider a decision if the request is made prior to the next City Council meeting, regardless of whether it is a regular or special meeting.
Accessible Public Meetings
The City of Pleasanton can provide special assistance for persons with disabilities to participate in public meetings. To make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation (e.g., an assistive listening device), please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 123 Main Street, Pleasanton, CA 94566 or (925) 931-5027 at the earliest possible time. If you need translation or interpretation assistance, please provide at least two working days’ notice prior to the meeting date.
Item #1
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Tuesday, October 7, 2025
7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Balch called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at the hour of 7:00 p.m. from the Council Chamber located at 200 Old Bernal Avenue.
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch
Absent: None.
AGENDA AMENDMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Balch opened public comment. The following individuals provided comment:
Gabrielle Welk.
Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
MOTION: It was m/s by Nibert/Eicher to approve the consent calendar as recommended. Motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch Noes: None
Absent: None
City Council
1. Ratify Commission appointments
Recommendation: Ratify Commission appointments.
Community and Economic Development
2. Actions of the Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission Recommendation: Actions of the Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission.
City Council Minutes
October 7, 2025
3. Introduce an ordinance amending Title 20 and Title 18 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code to adopt by reference the 2025 Edition of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Parts 1-12, including the 2024 International Building, Existing Building, Residential, Fire, Wildland-Urban Interface, Property Maintenance, and Swimming Pool and Spa Codes; the 2024 Uniform Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; the 2023 National Electrical Code and the 2025 California Green Building Standards Code Recommendation: Introduce Ordinance No. 2299 updating various chapters within Pleasanton Municipal Code Title 20 and Title 18 concerning the adoption of the 2025 Edition of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 c.c.r.), including by reference the 2024 International Building, Existing Building, Residential, Wildland- Urban Interface, and Fire Codes; the 2024 Uniform Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; the 2023 National Electrical Code and the 2025 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen).
4. Introduce an ordinance amending Chapter 18.106 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code regarding accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, to comply with State law [P25-0026]
Recommendation:
1. Find that the proposed amendment to the Municipal Code is statutorily exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 and categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15303; and
2. Introduce Ordinance No. 2300, find the subject code amendment consistent with the General Plan, and approve Case P25-0026, an amendment to the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC).
5. Introduce an ordinance amending Section 5.28.080 System of Assessments of the Pleasanton Municipal Code, to permit changes to the manner in which the annual assessment is levied within the Downtown Pleasanton Business Improvement District, and to levy the annual assessment for 2026
Recommendation: Introduce Ordinance No. 2301 amending the Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 5.28.080 System of Assessments, to permit changes to the manner in which the annual assessment is levied within the Downtown Pleasanton Business Improvement District, and to levy the annual assessment for 2026.
City Council Minutes
October 7, 2025
Finance
6. Accept the monthly disbursement and investment report for August 2025 Recommendation: Accept claim disbursements in the amount of $21,970,118 and the investment report for the month of August 2025.
Library and Recreation
7. Adopt a resolution approving a revised Library Collection Development Policy to comply with AB 1825, the California Freedom to Read Act Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-056 approving a revised Library Collection Development Policy to comply with AB 1825, the California Freedom to Read Act.
Public Works
8. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. for the development of the Stormwater System Management Plan, CIP No. 25659 in the amount not-to-exceed $2,192,186 (inclusive of a 15 percent contingency) for four years
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. for the development of the Stormwater System Management Plan, CIP No. 25659 in the amount not-to-exceed $2,192,186 (inclusive of a 15 percent contingency) for four years.
9. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Park Planet for the Annual Playground Renovations Project, CIP No. 25745 to renovate the playground at Moller Park in the amount not to exceed $166,251 (including a project contingency of $16,625)
Recommendation:
1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Park Planet for the Annual Playground Renovations Project, CIP No. 25745 to renovate the playground at Moller Park in the not-to-exceed amount of $166,251 (including a project contingency of $16,625)
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works or designee to approve and execute amendments to the agreement with Park Planet for an amount not to exceed $16,625 (approximately 10 percent of the agreement amount).
3. Authorize the return of $365,956 of the remaining project funding to the fund balance in the Parks CIP - General Fund (Fund 221) for future eligible projects.
City Council Minutes
October 7, 2025
MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
10. Presentation of a commendation in recognition of Anish Joshi’s attainment of Eagle Scout rank and contributions to the City of Pleasanton
Vice Mayor Nibert presented the commendation to recipient Anish Joshi.
11. Oath of Office for new commission members
Recommendation: The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to new commission members.
12. Public Comment regarding items not listed on the agenda – Speakers are limited to 3 minutes.
Mayor Balch opened public comment. The following individuals provided comment:
Sharon Piekarski, Vin Pohray, Debbie Wallace, and Randy Kramm.
Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS
13. Public Hearing: Adopt resolutions to amend the Master Fee Schedule for water rates and connection fees and sewer rates, effective January 1, 2026 Recommendation:
1. Hold a public hearing to consider proposed water and sewer rates.
2. Adopt Resolution Nos. 2025-057 and 2025-058 to amend the Master Fee Schedule for water rates and connection fees and sewer rates, effective January 1, 2026
Presentation by Sanjay Gaur and Nancy Phan (Water Resource Economics).
Mayor Balch opened public comment. The following individuals provided comment: Jan Morrison, John Lotoszyuski, Vin Pohray, Randy Kramm, and Grace Scerri.
Mayor Balch closed the public comment.
Mayor Balch called a recess at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at 9:08 p.m.
Staff reported that a total of 19 protests were received.
City Council Minutes
October 7, 2025
MOTION: It was m/s by Testa/Eicher to approve the item as recommended. Motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch Noes: None
Absent: None
MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL
None.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmembers reported on regional and local meetings attended.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Balch adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m.
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
Item #2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
November 4, 2025
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: ACTIONS OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND PLANNING
COMMISSION
P25-0268, Devendra Deshwal
Application for Administrative Design Review approval to remove approximately 320- square-feet of accessory structures and construct an approximately 232-square-foot single-story addition to the rear of an existing residence and legalize a rear attached unpermitted single-story approximately 427-square-foot sunroom located at 4236 Jensen Street.
Project Information:
Existing floor area: 1,762 square feet
Total floor area with addition: 1,852 square feet
Lot size: 6,111 square feet
Existing floor area ratio: 28.83 percent
Total floor area ratio with addition: 30.31 percent
Approved. (10 days)
P25-0298, Eva Sabala
Application for Administrative Design Review approval to convert an existing approximately 56-square-foot second-story front porch into living space at an existing two-story residence located at 2070 Palmer Drive.
Project Information:
Existing floor area: 3,013 square feet
Total floor area with addition: 3,069 square feet
Lot size: 8,954 square feet
Existing floor area ratio: 33.65 percent
Total floor area ratio with addition: 34.28 percent
Approved. (10 days)
PLANNING COMMISSION - October 22, 2025
Commissioners Present: Commissioners Jagoe, Jain, Mohan, Pace, and Chair Morgan
Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Wedge
PUD-54-01M & P25-0294, Tony and Linda Brunetti, Winding Oaks Drive Applications to amend the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan to allow the installation of gates on private drives at the discretion of the Community and Economic Development Director or their designee, and application for a Planned Unit Development Major Modification to PUD-54's approved development plan to install an electric gate at the entrance to Winding Oaks Drive. The project is within the scope of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). No additional environmental review is required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15162 because no substantial changes to the PUD are proposed, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, and no new information of substantial importance shows that the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR.
Action Recommended: Adopt Resolutions No. PC-2025-20 and PC-2025-21 recommending City Council approval of the amendment to the VACSP (P25-0294) and the PUD Major Modification Application (PUD-54-01M), respectively.
Action Taken: Adopted Resolution No. PC-2025-20 and PC-2025-21, as recommended.
Vote: 5-0
P24-0596 & Tract 8724, Trumark Homes, 0 Vineyard Avenue Private Street Names for P24-0596 and Amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8724, 0 Vineyard Avenue, APN: 946-461-900-1. Environmental review was conducted for the proposed 27-lot project, in the form of a Section 15183 Consistency Checklist under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8724 to include private street names is within the scope of the project previously analyzed, and no further CEQA review is required. The minor amendment is also not a project under CEQA.
Action Recommended: Adopt Resolution No. PC-2025-22 approving the amendment to Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8724.
Action Taken: Adopted Resolution No. PC-2025-22, as recommended.
Vote: 5-0
P25-0352, City Wide, City Initiated Pleasanton Municipal Code Amendments Consider and provide a recommendation to City Council for proposed amendments to Chapters 18.12, 18.20, 18.22, 18.68, 18.103, 18.104, 18.105, 18.110, 18.116, 18.124,
18.128, 18.132, and 18.144 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code to implement modifications to Design Review, noticing, appeals, and other process streamlining. The proposed code amendments are statutorily exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3).
Action Recommended: Adopt Resolution No. PC-2025-23 recommending City Council approval of the PMC amendments.
Action Taken: Adopted Resolution No. PC-2025-23, as recommended.
Vote: 5-0
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Eric Luchini
Zoning Administrator
Ellen Clark
Director of Community and
Economic Development
Gerry Beaudin
City Manager
Item #3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
November 4, 2025
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 2301 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, AMENDING SECTION 5.28.080 SYSTEM OF
ASSESSMENTS TO PERMIT CHANGES TO THE MANNER IN WHICH THE ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT IS LEVIED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN PLEASANTON BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, AND TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR 2026
The foregoing Ordinance No. 2301 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on October 7, 2025, by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Eicher, Gaidos, Nibert, Testa, Mayor Balch Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
ORDINANCE NO. 2301
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, AMENDING SECTION 5.28.080 SYSTEM OF ASSESSMENTS TO PERMIT CHANGES
TO THE MANNER IN WHICH THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IS LEVIED WITHIN THE
DOWNTOWN PLEASANTON BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, AND TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR 2026
WHEREAS, under and pursuant to the provisions of the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, Section 36500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code (“’89 Law”), on September 16, 2025, the City Council of the City of Pleasanton (“City”) adopted Resolution No. 2025-055, titled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE 2025 ANNUAL REPORT AND 2026
BUDGET OF THE DOWNTOWN PLEASANTON BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT,
DECLARING THE INTENTION TO AMEND PLEASANTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
5.28.080 SYSTEM OF ASSESSMENTS TO PERMIT CHANGES TO THE MANNER IN WHICH
THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IS LEVIED, AND TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR 2026”; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2025-055 was duly published, and copies of Resolution No. 2025-055 were mailed to the affected businesses, as required by the 89 Law; and
WHEREAS, as specified in Resolution No. 2025-055, a public hearing concerning the formation of the Downtown Pleasanton Business Improvement District (“District”) will be held before the City Council on November 4, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber of the City of Pleasanton, located at 200 Old Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton, California 94566; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the 89 Law, a determination is made that there has been no finding of a majority protest against the proposed District by the City Council following said public hearing. A "majority protest", pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 36525, would have consisted of written protests received from the business owners which will pay 50% or more of the proposed assessment; and
WHEREAS, based in part on recommendations of the Pleasanton Downtown Association, and the stated purpose of the District to support economic vitality, the District will continue to support businesses in the Downtown; and
WHEREAS, the District assessments are to be modified to expand business support through new events and community programming, beautification and placemaking programs, and business recruitment and retention initiatives, and to provide a stable funding source for the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby establishes a business improvement area to be named “Pleasanton Downtown Business Improvement District” and levies the annual assessment for 2026.
SECTION 2. The boundaries of the District are Del Valle Parkway/Vervais Drive/Ray Street to the north, Bernal Avenue to the south, First Street to the east, and Peters Avenue/Old Bernal Avenue to the west, as shown on the map attached as Exhibit A.
Attachment 1
SECTION 3. Section 5.28.080 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 5.28.080 System of Assessments
All businesses, trades or professions within the boundaries of the district shall be subject to an annual assessment in an amount as follows:
A. Assessment shall be equal to three times the amount of the annual city business license tax for all businesses located curb-side, downstairs on Main Street, except that there shall be a minimum assessment of one hundred twenty-five dollars per year and a maximum of seven hundred and fifty dollars per year.
B. Assessment shall be equal to two times the amount of the annual city business license tax for all businesses with Main Street addresses located upstairs or not curb-side, except there shall be a minimum assessment of one hundred twenty-five dollars per year and a maximum of seven hundred and fifty dollars per year.
C. Assessment shall be equal to one and one-half times the amount of the annual business license tax for all businesses in the district off of Main Street except there shall be a minimum assessment of one hundred twenty-five dollars per year and a maximum of seven hundred and fifty dollars per year.
D. Any business exempt from the City’s business license tax shall pay an annual charge of four hundred and fifty dollars per year, except as provided by subsections E and F of this section.
E. Non-profit organizations that are exempt from the City’s business license tax shall also be exempt from the annual assessment.
F. Insurance agents who are exempt from the City’s business license tax shall pay an assessment based on annual gross receipts as if their business were not exempt and the annual assessment shall be computed as in subsections A through C of this section.
G. If several independent contractors are located at one business address and conducting a similar business service, the maximum charge of four hundred and fifty dollars may be charged to the owner of this business. Notwithstanding this option, each independent contractor shall obtain a business license.
H. Assessments shall be adjusted annually on January 1st based on the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco/Oakland region, rounded to the nearest dollar.
SECTION 4. All of the businesses in the District established by this Ordinance shall be subject to any amendments to the provisions of the 89 Law.
SECTION 5. Revenue generated from the levy of the assessments within the District shall be used to fund improvements and activities within the District and shall not be used outside the District.
SECTION 6. Assessments shall be assessed and collected at the time and in the manner and with the same penalties as is provided in the Pleasanton Municipal Code for the collection of business license taxes. The City’s Finance Director is authorized to advance funds to the District in anticipation of expected revenues.
SECTION 7. The City Council has found that the businesses and the property within the District shall be benefited by the improvements and activities funded by the assessment to be levied.
SECTION 8. A summary of this ordinance shall by published once within (15) days after its adoption in “The Valley Times,” a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Pleasanton, and the complete ordinance shall be posted for fifteen (15) days in the City Clerk’s office within fifteen (15) days after its adoption.
SECTION 9. This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption.
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasanton on October 7, 2025, and adopted on November 4, 2025 by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
Jack Balch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
4318
4326
160
4340
4158
164
4310
4304
4332
4306
162
450
4673
CALI CT
BENJAMIN
CT
4191
4137
4306
4329
4321
4318
4342
4349
4355
4363
4371
4362
4370
4354
435
4358 4377
4376
4374
4382
4389
4397
4382
4388
DEF
ARENDT WY
4408
4401
4467 4 468
NEAL ST
4484
4492
4501
4568
4545
4547
456
45 ELA ST EAST ANGELA ST
4614
4616
4620
4625
4630
4661
4636 4639
4653
4667
288
268
ABBIE ST
4699
4698
ABBIE ST
264
260
252
CT
4350
4348
4366
4584
4649
300
4253
4319
ABC
4444 4453
4456
4524
4546
4559
46 4646
4662
46 4183
4 4
4 46
4615
4622
4687
543
545
547
551
555
4678
1037
4725
4074
EXHIBIT A
519
515
581
4590
400
401
4435
4259
4265
4271
4275
4277
4448
4625
1 4223
4229
4235
4312
43414324
4330
43364337
4345
4410
4466
4543
4582 45
4618
4672
4713
4307
4443
4558
Item #4
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
November 4, 2025
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: ACCEPT THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PERFORMED BY COLUMBIA
ELECTRIC FOR THE VALLEY AVENUE AND NORTHWAY ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION PROJECT, CIP NO. 23532, AND AUTHORIZE THE
RETURN OF THE REMAINING PROJECT FUNDS TO THE GAS TAX FUND (FUND 160) AND THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FUND (FUND 212)
SUMMARY
The Valley Avenue and Northway Road Traffic Signal Installation Project, Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. 23532, involved installing a new traffic signal and implementing related improvements at the intersection of Valley Avenue and Northway Road. The City Council awarded the construction contract to Columbia Electric on April 16, 2024. Construction of the project is now complete. Staff now requests that the City Council accept the improvements, and authorize the return of remaining project funds to the Traffic Impact Fee and Gas Tax Funds.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Accept the project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
2. Authorize the release of retention in the amount of $59,134.76 to Columbia Electric, 30 days after the recordation of the Notice of Completion.
3. Authorize the return of the remaining project funding, in the amount of $137,179 to the fund balance in the Traffic Impact Fee Fund (Fund 212) and the Gas Tax Fund (Fund 160).
BACKGROUND
Staff prepares a traffic signal priority list biannually by evaluating various relevant factors, including eight-hour traffic volume, peak-hour traffic volume, crash history, adjacent land use, and pedestrian/bicycle volumes. The list of intersections to be evaluated is compiled based on staff recommendations and resident requests, as well as projections of future needs due to land use or traffic patterns. The intersection of Valley Avenue and Northway Road was identified as the top candidate for construction on the signal priority list. The intersection is adjacent to Harvest Park Middle School and just north of Walnut Grove Elementary School.
During school commutes, the increase in vehicular traffic, combined with the number of children and adults walking and riding their bikes, reduces the intersection's level of service to an unacceptable level.
On April 16, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Columbia Electric in the amount of $1,155,127. The intersection of Valley Avenue and Northway Road is a T- intersection. The improvements included building a four-phase traffic signal, including left-turn
arrows for northbound Northway Road and westbound Valley Avenue; moving the crosswalk on Valley Avenue to the east side to eliminate the northbound left-turn vehicle-pedestrian conflict; and expanding the paved area at the southeast and southwest corners to reduce the pedestrian crossing distances.
DISCUSSION
The project was completed in phases due to the timing of the delivery of the traffic signal equipment, which has lengthy manufacturing times. The civil improvements were completed at the intersection in August 2024, prior to the start of the 2024-2025 school year. During this time, the intersection operated with stop control for northbound Northway Road and a rectangular rapid flashing beacon at the east crosswalk for pedestrian safety. Most of the traffic signal equipment for this project was delivered in December 2024, with equipment from the City’s spare inventory used to facilitate the completion of the project during the Pleasanton Unified School District’s winter break. The intersection became fully operational in January 2025. The City’s spare inventory used on this project was fully replaced with the last equipment deliveries from the manufacturer in June and July 2025.
Change Orders
The following change orders resulted in a net increase of $27,568 to the original construction contract, for the final project cost of $1,320,864:
1. Change Order No.1 totaled $17,488 and consisted of the following:
• Installing new junction boxes
• Installing lighting wiring.
2. Change Order No. 2 totaled $17,942 and consisted of the following:
• Relocating the existing rectangular rapid flashing beacon for temporary pedestrian safety control.
3. Change Order No. 3 totaled $15,206 and consisted of the following:
• Removal of junction boxes, add new conduit connectors, re-route wiring, and pour concrete sidewalk.
4. Change Order No. 4 totaled $2,860 and consisted of the following:
• Repair landscape sod.
5. A balancing change order for a net decrease of $25,929 was the result of the difference between the contract quantities constructed and the Engineer’s Estimate of quantities within the bid documents.
Attachment 1 more fully details the project's funding and expenditures. As described in the
Fiscal Impact Section, below, the CIP was funded with $1,458,043 of Traffic Impact Fee and Gas Tax Funds. It is recommended that the balance ($137,179) be returned to these two funds.
The work has been completed to the City Engineer's satisfaction, and it is recommended that the project be accepted as complete by the City Council.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Approval of this action advances the Transportation and Land Use action E5, to implement the Complete Streets Program, in the City’s Climate Action Plan 2.0. This action advances active, shared, and public transportation within the city, integrating infrastructure that accommodates multiple modes of transportation.
OUTREACH
Public outreach included construction notices, social media posts, and information posted on the City’s website prior to the start of construction. Construction notices were sent to residents in the project area, as well as the Harvest Park Middle School, Walnut Grove Elementary School, and the Pleasanton Unified School District.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this action advances the Citywide strategic goal Investing in Our Environemtn, to Implement the four-year Capital Improvement Program as well as the goal to Continue to invest in parks, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, and public art. This action will improve traffic safety and the level of comfort for cyclists and pedestrians commuting to school.
FISCAL IMPACT
Total funding for CIP No. 23532 was $1,458,043 of Traffic Impact Fee and Gas Tax funds. The total project expenditure was $1,320,864, leaving a balance of $137,179 in the project fund (see Attachment 1). Staff recommends that the remaining project balance be returned to the Traffic Impact Fee Fund (Fund 212) and the Gas Tax Fund (Fund 160).
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Cedric Novenario, Senior
Transportation Engineer
Ellen Clark, Director of Community and
Economic Development
Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:
1. Funding and Expenditure Summary
ATTACHMENT 1
CIP NO. 23532
11/04/25
Project Funding to Date Amount Totals
$750,000.00
$116,156.00
$196,686.00
$194,512.00
$200,689.00
2022-2023 CIP Allocation (Fund 212 - TIF)
2023-2024 CIP 23541 Transfer to CIP 23532 (Fund 212 - TIF) 2023-2024 CIP 23534 Transfer to CIP 23532 (Fund 160 - Traffic Gas Tax) 2023-2024 CIP 23541 Transfer to CIP 23532 (Fund 160 - Traffic Gas Tax) 2023-2024 CIP 23555 Transfer to CIP 23532 (Fund 160 - Traffic Gas Tax)
SUBTOTAL FUNDING TO DATE
Project Expenditures to Date
PG&E Engineering $2,500
Columbia Electric - Construction Contract $1,155,127
Columbia Electric - Construction Contract - Change Order No. 1 $17,488 Columbia Electric - Construction Contract - Change Order No. 2 $17,942 Columbia Electric - Construction Contract - Change Order No. 3 $15,206 Columbia Electric - Construction Contract - Change Order No. 4 $2,860 Columbia Electric - Construction Contract - Blancing Change Order No. 5 -$25,929 Hexagon Transportation Consultants (On-Call for Traffic Engineering) $38,300 Mark Thomas & Co. (On-Call for Traffic Engineering) $97,369
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Funding Balance/ (Shortfall)
Current Balance 137,179
VALLEY AVE & NORTHWAY RD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
$1,320,864
$1,458,043
Item #5
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
November 4, 2025
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A FOURTH AMENDMENT
TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC., FOR AN ADDITIONAL $999,954, FOR A NEW TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $3,995,644, TO COMPLETE 100 PERCENT DESIGN FOR PHASE 2 OF THE WEST LAS POSITAS MULTIMODAL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (OWENS DRIVE TO SANTA RITA ROAD, CIP NO. 26514)
SUMMARY
On December 6, 2022, the City Council awarded an agreement to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. (Mark Thomas) to provide detailed design and construction documents for Phase 1 of the West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project (from Hopyard Road to the Iron Horse Trail). Phase 2 of the West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project extends the improvements from the Iron Horse Trail/Owens Drive to Santa Rita Road. On August 19, 2025 the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a project funding agreement with Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) to receive a $750,000 grant to complete the design and construction documents for Phase 2 of the Project. Staff requests that the City Council authorize an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas to complete this work. The grant award requires a 25 percent local match; the City’s Direct Local Distribution of Measure BB Pedestrian and Bicycle Funds is proposed to be used to provide the $250,000 match, covering the total $999,954 estimated cost of the amendment to prepare the Phase 2 design and construction documents.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager to issue the Fourth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., for an additional $999,954, for a new total contract amount of $3,995,644, to complete 100 percent design for Phase 2 of the West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project (Owens Drive to Santa Rita Road, CIP No. 26514).
BACKGROUND
West Las Positas Boulevard is a key east-west arterial roadway and a critical connection for the city’s bicycle, pedestrian, and transit networks, providing a primary link from residential neighborhoods to regional trails, schools, retail, and office land uses. The portion of the road between Hopyard Road and Stoneridge Drive was constructed in the early 1980s as part of the development of the Hacienda Business Park. West Las Positas Boulevard has a history of soil settlement and differential movement within the Hacienda Business Park, resulting in uneven roadway surfaces and localized roadway failures.
In 2018, the City adopted an update to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, which identified the West Las Positas Boulevard corridor between Foothill Road and Fairlands Drive as the highest priority for pedestrian and bicycle improvements.
In 2021, the West Las Positas Boulevard Street Sinking Repair Reserve, CIP No. 11514, and the West Las Positas Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project, CIP No. 17567, were combined into one CIP and renamed the West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project, CIP No. 11514, to address both roadway settlement issues and pedestrian/bicycle improvements.
On December 6, 2022, the City Council awarded an agreement to Mark Thomas to provide 35 percent design that aided the development of construction phasing and implementation plans for the project. The contract term was extended by the First Amendment to the Agreement on June 14, 2024.
On July 16, 2024, the City Council authorized the Second Amendment to the Mark Thomas agreement to complete the 100 percent design and create bid documents for construction for the section of West Las Positas between Hopyard Road and the Iron Horse Trail.
On October 21, 2025, the City Council authorized the Third Amendment to the Agreement to include additional work required that was not captured in the added scope of work in Amendment 2. This added scope is needed to complete the 100 percent design for the Hopyard Road to Iron Horse Trail section.
The City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 included a new project, which separates the Phase 2 work for the West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project. CIP 26514 was established and funded with grants from the Alameda County Transportation Commission (CTC) and Measure BB Bike and Pedestrian funding. The proposed Fourth Amendment to the agreement with Mark Thomas, covering the 100 percent design for Phase 2 of the West Las Positas project, will be fully funded under CIP 26514.
DISCUSSION
West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction
The concept design cost estimates for the long-term multimodal improvements between Foothill Road and Fairlands Drive ranged from $25-$30 million, exceeding available funding.
To determine the implementation strategy with limited funding, the project was divided into multiple segments.
• Phase 1 of the project, from Hopyard Road to Iron Horse Trail, addresses the most significant roadway settlement.
• Phase 2 of the project extends from Iron Horse Trail to Santa Rita Road and addresses the most significant pedestrian and bicycle conflicts with vehicles.
In Phase 2, the center median will be narrowed, bike lanes will be elevated to sidewalk grade, and a landscape buffer will be created to further separate vehicles from bicyclists. A new sidewalk will be installed along the south side of the street, and a pedestrian crosswalk will be added to Owens Drive to facilitate pedestrian crossing of West Las Positas Boulevard. The Santa Rita Road intersection will be modified to eliminate the southwest "pork chop" island, and the northwest "pork chop" will be modified to allow for controlled pedestrian and bicycle movements to the elevated bike lane and sidewalk.
Schedule
Phase 1 is anticipated to be bid in mid-2026, with construction beginning in the fall of 2026.
The design of Phase 2 of the project is anticipated to take nine months to complete. This timeline could allow both Phase 1 and Phase 2 to be bid simultaneously in the fall of 2026.
Bidding and completing both phases simultaneously should result in some construction cost savings.
Consultant Services
Mark Thomas completed the 95 percent plans for Phase 1 in June 2025 and is preparing the necessary documents for environmental clearance (California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)). The consultant is also in the process of obtaining the required Caltrans Authorization for Construction and temporary construction easements.
Phase 2 of the project will not require NEPA clearance or Caltrans review, resulting in a faster design completion compared to Phase 1. The City is satisfied with Mark Thomas’s work on the project, and staff recommends amending the existing contract to include the Phase 2 design.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Approval of this project will advance the Climate Action Plan (CAP 2.0) in Transportation and Land Use by promoting an effective transportation system and enhancing bike and pedestrian access for the community through the development of a multi-modal corridor.
OUTREACH
The concept plan was presented to the Bike, Pedestrian and Trails Committee, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Hacienda Business Park’s residents/owners in the summer of 2023. Information on the West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project is also posted on the City’s website. Staff will be developing an extensive outreach program to collaborate with adjacent property owners, anticipate and manage construction impacts, and maintain access to adjacent properties. Both the grant funding application and award were reviewed by the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Committee and the City Council.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this action advances the Citywide ONE Pleasanton strategic plan goal of Investing in Our Environment, Strategy 1—Implement the four-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to complete the design and construction of budgeted capital projects, and the strategy to continue to invest in parks, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, and public art. This action will improve traffic safety and the level of comfort for cyclists and pedestrians commuting to school.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the scope of work covered under this Fourth Amendment to the contract with Mark Thomas is budgeted and available in the fiscal year 2025/2026 CIP budget, under CIP No. 26514, West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction - Owens Drive to Santa Rita Road. The funding for this CIP includes a $750,000 grant from ACTC, which requires a $250,000 local match. This local match is provided by the direct local distribution of Measure BB pedestrian and bicycle funds, and would augment the grant to cover the full cost of the proposed contract amendment.
Project Funding Summary
Phase 1 (design and construction) CIP No. 11514
• $9,867,000 from grant funds ($7.3 million plus previous grant balance of $867,000 of Measure B and Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) and $1.7 million from a Federal “Safe Routes to School” grant), $1,434,208 from the City’s direct disbursements of Measure B and BB Bike and Pedestrian funds, which is restricted to bike and pedestrian improvements that can be used on the entire corridor • $25,050,131 in Gas Tax, Measure F, and Measure BB Local Streets and Road funds, and Miscellaneous CIP General Fund, Street CIP, NPID 1 funding • $400,000 and $500,000 from the enterprise water and sewer funds, which are restricted solely to water and sewer work, respectively.
Phase 2 (design) CIP No. 26514
• $750,000 in Measure F (Vehicle Registration Fee) grant funds. • $250,000 in Measure BB Direct Local Distribution funds.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Mike Tassano, Traffic
Engineer/Community
Development Deputy
Director
Ellen Clark, Director of Community and
Economic Development
Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:
1. Fourth Amendment with Exhibit A
Fourth Amendment Page 1
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
This Fourth Amendment to Agreement ("Fourth Amendment") is entered into this 4th day of November 2025 by the City of Pleasanton ("City") and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. ("Consultant”).
Whereas, on December 6, 2022, the City and Consultant entered into a Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) for Civil Engineering Consulting Services for a not to exceed amount of $524,145; and
Whereas, on June 14, 2024, the City and Consultant executed the First Amendment to the agreement, extending the term of the agreement to August 1, 2024, to complete the 35 percent design plans; and
Whereas, on July 16, 2024, the City and Consultant executed the Second Amendment to the agreement to expand the scope of work to include 100 percent design plans and biddable construction documents, increase the contract maximum to a new not-to-exceed amount of $2,773,516.15, and extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2025; and
Whereas, on October 21, 2025, the City and Consultant executed the Third Amendment to the agreement to further expand the scope of work on the 100 percent design plans to a new not-to-exceed amount of $2,995,689.59, and extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2026; and
Whereas, the City received a $750,000 grant from Alameda County Transportation Commission to complete the design for Phase 2 of the West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project; and
Whereas, the City has allocated $250,000 in Measure BB Direct Local Distribution funding as the local match to the Alameda County Transportation Commission grant; and
Whereas, the parties desire to further extend the scope and compensation amount of the Agreement.
Now, therefore, in exchange for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Section 1, “Consultant Services” of the agreement is amended to include additional services for the completion of Phase 2 of the West Las Positas Multimodal Reconstruction Project as outlined in Exhibit 1, Scope of Work.
2. Section 5, “Compensation” of the agreement is amended to read:
The compensation is increasing by $999,954.25 for a new total compensation amount of $3,995,643.84. Total compensation for services and reimbursement for costs shall not exceed this total unless parties agree pursuant to Section 8;
Fourth Amendment Page 2
3. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
3. This Fourth Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement. Counterparts may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including pdf or any electronic signature complying with U.S. federal E-Sign Act of 2000 (15 U.S. Code §7001 et seq.), California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Cal. Civil Code §1633.1 et seq.), or other applicable law) or other transmission method, and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.
In witness whereof, authorized representatives of the parties have executed this Fourth Amendment to the Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
CITY OF PLEASANTON CONTRACTOR
_____________________________ By: __________________________ Gerry Beaudin, City Manager Signature
_Shawn O’Keefe____________
Print name
Title: Principal + Vice President
ATTEST:
_____________________________ [If Consultant is a corporation, signatures must comply Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk with California Corporations Code §313]
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________
_____________________________ Signature
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
__________________________
Print name
Title: __________________________
Rev. 3/19
1 DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK - PHASE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND DESIGN
Project Understanding
Mark Thomas’ scope of services for the West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project includes engineering and design services for project management, surveying and mapping, environmental services, and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the Phase 1 project between Hopyard Road and Stoneridge Drive. To date, we have completed preparation of 95% PS&E for the Phase 1 project improvements to West Las Positas Boulevard between Hopyard Road and Stoneridge Drive and are working towards the NEPA and CEQA environmental clearance and 100% PS&E submittal.
Based on discussions with the City, this scope of services has been prepared to provide engineering and design services for project management, surveying and mapping, environmental services, and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the Phase 2 project between Iron Horse Trail and Santa Rita Road The Phase 2 project will connect to the Phase 1 project improvements on West Las Positas Boulevard, reconfiguring the roadway from a 6-lane section to a 4-lane section with 6' to 7' wide elevated cycle tracks on both sides, landscaped buffers, and intersection safety improvements, such as a protected intersection. Pavement rehabilitation for this segment of West Las Positas Boulevard will be grind and overlay only. No full-depth pavement section reconstruction with soil stabilizing subbase is anticipated beyond potential pavement 'dig-out' areas for subbase repair and replacement to be identified by the City.
Improvements will be consistent with the 35% Plans for the West Las Positas Boulevard Multimodal Reconstruction Project (CIP No. 11514), submitted in January 2024.
Scope of Services:
Our scope of work encompasses civil, drainage, sewer, water, landscape, and electrical design to prepare approved plans, specifications, and estimate (PS&E) and environmental clearance documents under CEQA for use by the City in bidding constructing the improvements. This scope of work, and associated Fee Estimate, assumes preparation of a single set of PS&E for a single bid alternative will be developed as identified above.
The specific tasks to be completed and deliverables to be provided by Mark Thomas for the project are outlined below.
Task 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
Mark Thomas will provide ongoing project management for each task for the duration of the Contract term, which is assumed to be 10 months encompassing the design, environmental clearance, and bidding periods. Project management activities will consist of management, administration, coordination, supervision, project controls, attending meetings, and as follows:
Task 1.1. Project Management and Control
Mark Thomas will supervise, coordinate, and monitor activities and product development for conformance with the Cities’ standards and policies and local ordinances. Prior to the start of any Services, Mark Thomas will interface with City staff to assure format consistency of deliverables and to facilitate free and timely flow of information for each task activity.
Mark Thomas will prepare a detailed critical path method (CPM) schedule to reflect plan and progress of Services and to serve as a master schedule for the Project. The schedule will be updated on a monthly basis to include key milestones and tasks completed.
Task 1.2. Project Administration/Project Coordination
Mark Thomas will prepare and submit monthly progress reports that will identify work performed on each task in the preceding month, including percent completed compared to percent billed for each task must be shown. The monthly summary will show total charges made to each task, the Contract budget for each task, reallocated budget amounts, prior billing amount, current billing, total billed to date, and a total percent billed to date.
Mark Thomas will coordinate planning and design efforts with stakeholders including Caltrans, Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA), utility companies, and private property/business owners as required. This includes design
2 reviews and integration of adjacent public agency and third-party utility company designs for incorporation into the project design as appropriate.
Task 1.3. Project Meetings
Mark Thomas will arrange and conduct up to 20 bi-weekly (i.e. once every two weeks) Project Development Team (PDT) meetings with project stakeholders as directed by the City which will include general discussion materials and preparation of agendas and minutes. Mark Thomas will endeavor to prepare and submit all meeting agendas one (1) week prior to the relevant meeting date and distribute draft meeting minutes for City review within three (3) working days after each meeting. Final meeting minutes will be distributed to the PDT incorporating relevant comments received on draft meeting minutes.
Mark Thomas will coordinate and attend up to two (2) coordination meetings with the City staff and project stakeholders to resolve technical issues. This task also includes preparation of meeting materials (i.e., presentations slides and exhibits) and attendance at up to two (2) public meetings, including one (1) virtual community meeting, and up to one (1) presentation at the Bicycle, Pedestrian and Trails Committee, City Parks and Rec Commission, or City Council meeting to facilitate discussion and answer questions about the designs. Preparation of materials and attendance at stakeholder and public meetings in addition to those identified above may be provided as an additional service.
Task 1.6. Quality Control
The Mark Thomas Quality Control plan consists of established procedures for performing the work (which are reassessed with each project), including methods for design calculations, establishing appropriate levels of design development for intermediate submittals, identification of required plan checks, design checklists, and methods of project documentation.
Our QC/QA Manager will implement and maintain these quality control procedures during the preparation of plans and documents throughout design.
TASK 1 DELIVERABLE(S):
• Monthly progress reports and invoices
• Monthly CPM schedule updates
• Project Cloud-based File Repository
• Project Team Meeting Attendance w/ agendas and minutes (up to 20 meetings) • Stakeholder Meetings (up to 2)
• Public Meetings (Up to 2)
• QC/QA Checklist
• All deliverables to be submitted electronically in .pdf format unless specified otherwise Task 2. SITE INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS
Task 2.1. Project Initiation and Data Gathering
Mark Thomas will coordinate the Phase 2 project kick-off meeting for final design with the City and members of the design team to discuss the project background, scope, concepts, schedule, project management, potential stakeholders and issues, outreach opportunities and expectations.
The data gathering process will include a review of the existing site characteristics. Mark Thomas will conduct site visits and take photographic inventory of existing conditions to reference during the design process and make observations related to sight distance at pedestrian crossings, ADA-compliance and potential tripping hazards on the sidewalks, and identify potential conflicts with existing utilities and privately-owned improvements within the public right-of-way. For estimating purposes, 2 days of site visits have been assumed to complete the field reviews.
Task 2.2. Supplemental Topographic Surveys and Base Map Preparation Mark Thomas proposes the following work plan to set project control, collect topographic survey, provide electronic base files for the design, and delineate public right-of-way limits as described below.
3 The general requirements for the work under this scope are listed below:
• These tasks will be completed under the direct supervision of a California Licensed Land Surveyor. • Base mapping will be delivered in AutoCAD Civil 3D 2018 or earlier version as required by the City. • Submittal of electronic information may be transmitted by email or posted to the Mark Thomas FTP site (or other FTP site, as directed) under password protection with instruction for retrieval and password transmitted by email.
Supplemental topographic survey and base mapping will be prepared by Mark Thomas for use with the Final Design plans and details.
Right of way information will be shown on the base mapping based on available GIS right of way information.
Supplemental Topographic Survey – Mark Thomas will conduct supplemental topographic survey to locate pertinent accessible above ground features to augment the City-furnished base mapping using conventional ground survey techniques. The limits of detailed topo will extend along W. Las Positas Boulevard from the limits of the Phase 1 project survey east of the intersection of Stoneridge Drive to Fairlands Drive.
Ground visible features to be captured include, but are not limited to sidewalks, curb and gutter, driveways, curb ramps, fences, private utilities, storm and sewer facilities, trees, street lighting, signing, striping, and markings within the project limits. Storm and sewer manholes will be dipped to determine invert elevations and pipe diameters within the streets around the site. Drain inlet invert elevations and pipe sizes will be based on information furnished by the City. Field crews will rely upon markings on utility feature lids. No utilities will be dipped other than sewer and storm. This scope of work is limited to five (5) days of field work.
Task 2.3. Boundary Surveys and Mapping (Optional Task)
We have assumed the project improvements will be entirely within the existing public right of way and Public Service Easements (PSE)for W. Las Positas Boulevard. Existing GIS right of way mapping and observed property boundaries, such as the existing back of sidewalk will likely provide adequate boundary information for the design of the project improvements. However, if additional project improvements are identified during the course of design that extend beyond the apparent limits of the public right of way, additional boundary surveys and right of way mapping can be completed as an optional task to refine the right of way delineated for the project.
As an optional task, Mark Thomas will perform a field survey to locate necessary monumentation to establish the right of way lines of West Las Positas Boulevard from Stoneridge Drive to Fairlands Drive. Our research indicates that the available Parcel maps (PM), Records of Survey (RS) & Tract maps (TM) will be sufficient to complete this survey. It is our understanding that no other monument ties to other maps will be necessary to complete the boundary surveys. Should a material discrepancy be found or evidence of a dispute with adjoiners be discovered, Mark Thomas will stop work under the current scope and discuss options to move forward. Once the locations of the property lines are established based on the field evidence collected, Mark Thomas will plot this boundary in a CAD file. Mark Thomas assumes only easements shown on the available Recorded Maps will be shown. It is assumed that boundary evidence necessary to define the boundary will be readily available.
During a boundary survey, it is possible that the requirement to file a Record of Survey will be triggered. This most often happens by the discovery of conflicts or alternate evidence not shown on recent maps. Should such a conflict or other evidence be discovered, work will stop, and the project team will be notified. Work will continue when agreement has been reached on path forward and additional budget for a Record of Survey has been secured.
Survey Assumptions and Exclusions:
• Monument Preservation is not included
• A Record of Survey is not included.
• Preparation of Plats and Legal Descriptions for property acquisition or easements is not included.
Task 2.4. Right of Way Exhibits
It is assumed the project does not require permanent right of way acquisitions as the improvements are within the existing public right of way and public service easements (PSE's) encompassing existing driveways, bus stops, sidewalks and utilities along W. Las Positas Boulevard. The City will obtain Permits to Enter and Construct (PTE&C’s) for the project work within PSE's, including reconstruction of sidewalks, grading changes adjacent to the intersections, and at conforms to reconstructed driveway approaches. It is assumed the City will lead the outreach, development, and execution of PTE&C Agreements with each property owner. To support the City's efforts, Mark Thomas will prepare Right of Way Exhibits showing the locations of work for the PTE&C's . Right of way information will be shown based on the project's base mapping using the City's GIS right of way information. No boundary work
4 or surveys will be provided under this task and areas for the PTE&C's will be approximate only. This scope of work assumes up to 15 Right of Way Exhibits will be provided with aerial backgrounds showing the limits of the PTE&C’s and providing a description of the work on each parcel. One round of revisions for these Right of Way Exhibits is included in this scope. Acquisition of Preliminary Title Reports for the impacted properties is not anticipated or included in this scope of work.
Task 2.5. Utility Coordination
For this project, we assume utility relocations will be limited to replacing existing sewer, storm drain, and water facilities where needed to repair damaged or sunken sections, accommodate new curbs for Class IV cycletracks, protected intersections and curb ramps. To the extent possible, relocation of dry utilities, including gas, communications, overhead electric and vaults/boxes will be avoided to mitigate the potential schedule risk for completion of design and scheduling of relocations by others.
Mark Thomas will coordinate with utility providers for relocation of wet utilities and adjustments to grade of dry utilities where necessary. Mark Thomas will utilize available, City-furnished, utility mapping. Mark Thomas will prepare a Composite Utility Relocation Plan using the 35% plan sheets as a base including a utility relocation schedule incorporating input from various utility owners. The Composite Utility Plan will be updated following the 65% submittal. Based on the Composite, Mark Thomas will prepare, and the City will issue letters (“B Letters”) requesting private utility owners to commence with utility relocation design and request detailed cost estimates and utility relocation schedules. Mark Thomas will provide private utility owners with design submittal drawings for use in developing relocation designs. Coordination with utility owners for plotting existing easements and acquiring new utility easements for relocated facilities is not included in these Services. Mark Thomas will prepare “C – Notice to Owner” letters notifying the utilities of the pending construction. Should any relocations of private utility facilities be required, it is assumed these designs will be provided by the private utility company.
Task 2.6. Potholing of Utilities
Utility potholing may be required to identify potential conflicts with underground facilities and allow for advance coordination for design and scheduling of utility relocations needed by others (i.e., PG&E and AT&T) to construct the project improvements. Potential conflicts requiring the raising/lowering or relocation of existing utilities include the reconstruction of roadway pavements and full depth reclamation, installation of permanent stormwater treatment facilities, relocation and reconstruction of existing storm drain and sewer facilities, relocation of streetlights and traffic signals, and adjusting utility boxes and covers to grade. Mark Thomas will select and utilize a qualified potholing company to provide positive horizontal location and verification of depth of existing subsurface utilities at locations identified as potential conflict points with the project.
Potholing (Allowance Item)
A pothole work plan will be submitted for review and approval by the City prior to performing field work. Mark Thomas will engage a utility potholing company to perform up to forty (40) potholes as part of this scope of services.
Due to the congested nature of the corridor, it is assumed that each pothole will cost approximately $2,500 with needed traffic control and pavement restoration. An allowance budget of $100,000 has been provided to conduct potholing as part of the design. Additional budget may be needed if USA markings need to be removed at the completion of potholing. Positive verification of existing utilities will still need to be conducted by the Contractor at the start of construction to verify the locations and depths of existing facilities.
Mark Thomas shall task a field crew to survey the location of potholed utilities and provide the horizontal and vertical location of the reference points set by others (potholer). This data will be updated in the utility base map and provided to the engineering team to facilitate design. This scope of work is limited to two (2) days of field work. It is assumed that field crews will mobilize after all potholes have been completed.
TASK 2 DELIVERABLE(S):
• Supplemental Survey and Pothole Location Survey – AutoCAD Format • Optional: Boundary Mapping (20 Scale) – AutoCAD Format • ROW Exhibits (Up to 15 parcels)
• Composite Utility Relocation Plan
• Utility “B & C Letters”
• Pothole Work Plan
• Allowance: Utility Pothole Reports (Up to 40)
• All deliverables to be submitted electronically in .pdf format unless specified otherwise
5 Task 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
As a subconsultant to Mark Thomas, Circlepoint will manage the environmental review effort and maintain close contact with City staff and the engineering team throughout the project design phase and the environmental review process.
This scope of work outlines the tasks and associated costs necessary to obtain environmental clearance for the project.
Based on our preliminary review, the project is anticipated to qualify for a Categorical Exemption (CE) under Section 15301, Class 1 – Existing Facilities of the CEQA Guidelines or for a Statutory Exemption (SE) under Senate Bill (SB) 922.
This scope of services assumes NEPA clearance will not be required.
The following scope of work reflects this level of effort.
Task 4.1. CEQA Clearance
Task 4.1.1. Project Management
Under this task, Circlepoint will attend up to four (4) project meetings, coordinate with the project team, prepare and submit monthly invoices, and manage the schedule and budget for all environmental deliverables. Circlepoint will coordinate with Mark Thomas and the City on background information and data needs.
Task 4.1.2. CEQA Clearance
As mentioned above, the project is anticipated to qualify for CEQA CE under Section 15301, Class 1 – Existing Facilities or an SE under SB 922. The Class 1 exemption applies to minor alterations to existing structures or infrastructure that result in negligible or no expansion of use including alterations to existing highways and streets, restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated facilities to meet current standards of public health and safety, or the addition of bicycle facilities. The SE under SB 922 applies to transportation projects statutorily exempt from CEQA and streamlining the environmental review process for the transportation projects, including “Pedestrian and bicycle facilities that improve safety, access, or mobility, including new facilities, within the public right-of-way”.
Circlepoint will support Mark Thomas and the City in selecting the most appropriate exemption pathway based on project details and eligibility criteria. Circlepoint will leverage its knowledge of the project area and past work in the Las Positas corridor to prepare a concise memorandum to support the use of the selected CE or SE for the proposed project. The memorandum will outline the qualifying factors that justify the application of the chosen exemption, based on the project’s characteristics and scope.
If the City prefers to pursue a Class 1 CE, the memorandum will also include a discussion of the exceptions to CEs (per CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2) and evaluate their applicability to the project. This assessment will be supported by recommendations and best management practices from technical studies (e.g., cultural resources) to be incorporated into the project description to avoid or minimize any potentially significant impacts. This documentation will provide a clear and well-supported rationale for the exemption and will serve as a key component of the administrative record.
Circlepoint will work with the City as the CEQA lead agency to file a Notice of Exemption (NOE) with the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) and the County Clerk’s office.
If the City prefers to pursue a SE under SB 922, the memorandum will include a discussion of the project’s consistency with the eligibility requirements specified to qualify for an SE under SB 922. These requirements include that the project must be led by a local agency, which is responsible for certifying the use of a skilled and trained workforce, unless an existing project labor agreement is in place. The project must also avoid increasing single-occupancy vehicle trips, adding highway lanes, or introducing new infrastructure, except for minor modifications to support transit, bicycles, or high-occupancy vehicles, and that the project should not involve the demolition of affordable housing units.
For projects exceeding $50 million, the local agency must hold at least three public meetings to gather public input and conduct two additional meetings annually during construction. Public notice must be provided via various methods, including newspaper publications, onsite/offsite postings, and online announcements.
If the project exceeds $100 million, it must be part of a regional transportation plan or undergo a programmatic-level environmental review. The lead agency must also complete a project business case and a racial equity analysis.
Furthermore, the agency must hold at least three public meetings, including one focused on reviewing the business case and racial equity analysis. If the project is located in an area at risk of residential displacement, an analysis must be conducted, and anti-displacement strategies should be proposed.
Should the project qualify for an SE under SB 922, then Circlepoint will work with the City to file a NOE with the LCI and the County Clerk’s office.
6 Recommended CEQA Technical Memos:
• Cultural Resources: Based on Circlepoint’s previous experience working in the Las Positas corridor, there is the potential for a documented cultural resource site to occur within the project site. Therefore, a Cultural Memo is included in this scope of work from qualified technical specialists with prior experience in the project area, Rincon Consultants Inc., evaluating whether the project has potential to impact cultural resources within the project site and recommendations for such resources, if needed.
TASK 4 DELIVERABLE(S):
• CEQA CE/SE Memorandum (including the NOE, and applicable CE/SE attachments) • Draft and Final Cultural Memo
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS:
• This scope of work and budget assumes the project will qualify for a CE or SE under CEQA. If it is determined that the project triggers an exception to an exemption, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration would be required under a separate proposal.
• All submittals will be conducted electronically (using PDF and Microsoft Word versions) • Circlepoint anticipates responding to two (2) rounds of revisions from the City on the CEQA CE/SE Memo.
Comments on draft documents will be provided to Circlepoint electronically using Microsoft Word’s track change feature.
• This scope of work assumes that NEPA clearance will not be required. • Attendance at public hearings is not included in this scope of work.
Task 5. FINAL DESIGN
The Mark Thomas team will complete final design for the Phase 2 project defined in the 35% Plans, dated January 2024, and prepare Plans, Specification, and Engineer’s Estimate (PS&E) submittals at the 65%, 95%, and 100% (pre- final) levels of completion. The intent of intermediate submittals is to define the project for review by the City and stakeholders, and to allow for major comments prior to investment of significant design effort in design details. The 100% (pre-final) submittal will be provided as a final plan check opportunity by the City to ensure prior comments have been addressed prior to bidding. Addressing new design comments provided by the City after the 100% (pre- final) design package has been submitted would be provided as an additional service with additional fee to be negotiated prior to the start of design revisions.
The approach listed below will best address the scope of improvements listed in our understanding of the project and will be built upon during the preparation of intermediate design submittals by adding plan information and detail sheets until a complete, buildable and biddable package is reached. This scope of work assumes a single bid package will be prepared for the Phase 1 improvements.
Below is an estimated count of plan sheets:
Sheet Name Number of
Sheets
Drawing Scale
Title Sheet 1 Not to scale
Standard Abbreviations/General Notes 1 Not to scale
Typical Cross Sections 2 Not to scale
Key Map 1 500
Project Control 1 500
Demolition Plans 3 20
Layout Plans 3 20
Construction Details 8 Varies
Water Pollution Control 3 20
Drainage and Utility Plans and Profiles 3 20
Drainage and Utility Details and Lateral
Profiles
2 Varies
Sewer Plan and Profiles 3 20
Construction Area Signs 1 200
Staging / Traffic Handling/Detour Plans - -
Stage 1 - 1 Phase 2 40
7 Stage 2 - 4 Phases 8 40
Stage 3 - 1 Phase 2 40
Pavement Delineation/Sign Plans and Details 4 20
Landscape Planting Plans and Landscape
Construction Details
8 20
Landscape Irrigation Plans and Details 11 20
Traffic Signal Modification Plans and
Schedules (Fehr & Peers)
6 20
Street Lighting Plans 2 40
Total Sheets 75
Task 5.1. 65% PS&E
The Mark Thomas team will develop plans, specifications, and estimate for 65% design and include comment- responses as received from the agencies’ review of 35% design submittal. The comment-response matrix will be prepared to identify, resolve, and document conflicts. It is assumed that no major geometric or other major project elements will change after the 65% design. Ahead of the 65% design, Mark Thomas will attend a PDT meeting with the City and other stakeholder agencies to resolve any issues from 35% design review. Mark Thomas will incorporate the agreed upon comments received from the City and other agencies into the 65% design. The 65% plan set will include all the sheets shown above.
65% Technical Specification
Mark Thomas will prepare technical specifications and bid form in the City’s standard format. It is assumed the City will provide the boilerplate contract and general provisions. The basis of the technical specifications will be the 2024 Caltrans Standard Specifications or as required by the City. 65% Construction Quantities and Cost Estimates
An itemized estimate of construction costs and construction quantities will be prepared using recent bid summaries for similar projects in the vicinity of Pleasanton. Prices will be adjusted using engineering judgement that reflects the project location and the quantity of each item. Cost estimates will be prepared for each project segment as identified above.
The 65% PS&E will be submitted to the City for review and comment.
Task 5.2. 95% PS&E
Upon receipt of a single set of non-conflicting comments from the City and reviewing agencies, the Mark Thomas team will prepare a Comment-Response Matrix listing the comment, source, and proposed resolution. Prior to starting further revisions to the designs, Mark Thomas will arrange a PDT meeting with City staff and stakeholders to review the comments received, discuss any questions, and confirm the resolutions. 95% Plans
The Mark Thomas team will incorporate all agreed upon comments received from the City and other agencies into the design plan sheets submitted as directed in 65% PS&E and prepare 95% construction plans. It is assumed that no major changes from the 65% design have been requested.
95% Technical Specification
Mark Thomas will incorporate all agreed upon comments into the technical specifications that are specific to the Project. Mark Thomas will also coordinate with the City to develop any language in the construction contract special conditions, with the City leading this effort.
95% Construction Quantities and Cost Estimates
Mark Thomas will update the construction quantity estimate submitted during 65% PS&E and submit updated quantity calculations showing all sketches, diagrams, and dimensions necessary for use by the City resident engineer and field inspectors. Mark Thomas will provide an independent review by internal staff not associated with the Project review and check quantity take-off calculations and cost estimates.
The 95% PS&E will be provided to the City for review and comment.
8 Task 5.3. 100% (Pre-final and Bid Set) PS&E
Upon receipt of a single set of non-conflicting comments from the City and reviewing agencies, the Mark Thomas team will prepare a Comment-Response Matrix listing the comment, source, and proposed resolution. If necessary, Mark Thomas will arrange a PDT meeting with City staff and stakeholders to review the comments received, discuss any questions and confirm the resolutions.
Once the comment resolutions are agreed upon, Mark Thomas will update the PS&E to the 100% (pre-final) design level. The 100% (pre-final) PS&E will be of sufficient detail for the City to use in bidding and constructing the project improvements. The 100% (pre-final) plans and specifications will be signed and sealed by a professional civil engineer in responsible charge of the work. Any comment by the City will be incorporated to the 100% (Bid Set) PS&E.
Bid Set PS&E will be submitted to the City in hardcopy and electronic format. Signed plans will be provided in PDF format. AutoCAD files for the drawings will be provided if requested. Specifications will be provided electronically in MS Word format.
Task 5.4. Landscape Design
Based on the final geometry and comments received on the 35% Package and Landscape Design Basis Memorandum , Mark Thomas will prepare Landscape Architectural PS&E submittals at the 65%, 95%, 100% and Bid Set levels of completion for the stretch of roadway between Stoneridge Drive and Fairlands Drive as a separate package. 65% plans will include planting plans and irrigation plans (in AutoCAD, 20-scale) and coordination with the civil team on existing trees to remain, hardscape layout, tree placement and bioretention planting areas similar in design to Phase 1. In this portion of roadway, it is assumed that the median curbs will not be replaced, however trees, ground plane plantings, and irrigation are to be replaced due to the condition of the trees and impacts of new, low volume irrigation. Planting plans will include tree, shrub, and groundcover locations, plant list, plant callouts and quantities, and associated landscape construction details. Irrigation plans will include points of connection locations, mainline layout, pressure loss calculations, irrigation equipment list, and associated details.
City comments from the 65% submittal will be addressed and incorporated into the 95% design. Responses will be prepared and submitted. Irrigation plans will include water use (MWELO) calculations, irrigation controller schedule, irrigation head and lateral layout with pipe sizing.
City comments from the 95% submittal will be addressed and incorporated into the 100% and Bid Set Submittals.
Responses to comments will be prepared and submitted. All final plan revisions will be made. Updates to the specifications and estimate will be completed.
Mark Thomas LAUD will provide technical specifications and estimates of probable construction costs for each design submittal.
The following deliverables are anticipated:
• Planting Plans and Landscape Construction Details;
• Irrigation Plans and Details
• Technical Specifications
• Itemized statement of probable construction costs
Task 5.5. Signals, Lighting and Electrical Design
Fehr & Peers will provide Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates (PS&E) for street lighting and traffic signal improvements along the West Las Positas corridor at the following locations:
• Street lighting modification between Stoneridge Drive and Santa Rita Road (about 2,200 feet) • Traffic signal modification at Iron Horse Trail/West Las Positas Boulevard • Traffic signal modification at Owens Drive/West Las Positas Boulevard • Traffic signal modification at Santa Rita Road/West Las Positas Boulevard Traffic signal plans will be prepared on 20-scale sheets; we estimate six (6) traffic signal plan sheets will be needed.
These traffic signal plans will show the locations of poles, equipment, and cabinets. Street lighting plans will be prepared on 40-scale sheets; we estimate two (2) street lighting plans will be needed.
Plans will be developed based on the City of Pleasanton design preferences and 2024 Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications. All plans will be developed in AutoCAD software. This scope assumes PG&E coordination is required for the traffic signal modifications along this segment. We will complete service applications and submit them to PG&E on
9 behalf of the City. This scope does not include PG&E coordination for undergrounding utilities. Any connection or application fees shall be paid for by the client. These fees are not included in this scope and fee.
Fehr & Peers will collect pertinent data related to the design, including obtaining record drawings, performing field confirmation of as-built data, and obtaining geometry CAD files from Mark Thomas. Plans will be developed using the base files for existing conditions and proposed improvements from Mark Thomas.
The traffic signal and street lighting PS&E will be submitted at the 65%, 95%, 100%, and Final design levels and will be reviewed by the City of Pleasanton. Comments will be addressed and incorporated into subsequent submittals. An engineers estimate and specifications will be provided at 65%, 95%, 100%, and Final design levels. This scope assumes we will receive one set of consolidated comments from the City at each review level.
Task 5.6. Draft and Final Storm Water Management Plan
Mark Thomas will prepare a Storm Water Control Plan in accordance with the City of Pleasanton Stormwater Permit requirements including a Storm Water Control Plan Checklist, Storm Water Requirements Checklist, Storm Water Management Plan (SMP), and Clean Bay Blueprint. The project is anticipated to require Provision C.3 Numerically Sized Treatment Requirements to size C.3 planters for reconstructed roadway pavement areas. C.3 planters are not required for bicycle and pedestrian facilities built within the existing paved roadway as they will direct stormwater runoff to adjacent vegetated areas. As such, preparation of sizing worksheets, special project worksheets, hydromodification calculations and flow duration controls are not included in this scope of services. A water pollution control plan showing the types and locations for BMPs during construction and permanent erosion control measures, including slope restorations measures, will be included in the final project plans.
Task 5.7. Draft and Final SWPPP
As a subconsultant to Mark Thomas, Crawford and Associates (Crawford)’s Qualified Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer (QSD) will prepare a design phase Conceptual SWPPP (CSWPPP) in compliance with the statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) CGP, Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, most recently updated by Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. The CSWPPP will comply with City standards and any Project-specific requirements from the RWQCB. Mark Thomas will use the SWPPP template and guidance developed by the California Stormwater Quality Association.
The CSWPPP will include the evaluation and documentation of the risk assessment as presented in the CGP.
Mark Thomas will identify potential temporary water quality and erosion impacts of the Project and propose appropriate temporary construction site and erosion control BMP measures. These BMP measures will be identified on the Water Pollution Control (WPC) Plans included in the CSWPPP. Permit Registration Documents (PRD’s) will be prepared including the Notice of Intent (NOI), a risk assessment, post-construction calculations, a site map, a SWPPP, a signed certificate, and the first annual permit fee to be paid by the City. Mark Thomas will coordinate with the City for review and approval.
The CSWPPP will be based on design-level information to be used for reference purposes only and will not be a construction document. Mark Thomas assumes no QSD or Qualified SWPPP Practitioner role during construction and that the selected Contractor’s QSD will be required to develop an independent SWPPP for approval by the City and uploaded to the State Water Resources Control Board’s Stormwater Multiple Applications and Report Tracking System (SMARTS).
Task 5.8. Constructability Reviews
Mark Thomas’ Construction Management Division engineers will conduct constructability review of the contract documents relative to issues that could impact the actual construction process, including standards, intersystem compatibility, subsurface information, existing facilities and utilities, interfaces with existing operations and other construction projects, access, egress, availability of proposed building materials, long lead procurement and labor sources. The goal of the constructability review is to improve the ease of construction, which in turn may reduce cost and/or time, as well as ensuring proper funding reimbursement.
Constructability Review of the plans, specifications and engineer’s estimate will take place at the 65% and 95% Plan submittal. This work includes:
• A field review of the Project limits. This field review will assist in comparing the planned improvements to the existing field conditions.
• Review of the Project plans, special provisions, technical provisions and estimate for possible errors and deficiencies. Create a tracking spreadsheet to ensure any action items are properly sent to the appropriate party for review and any corrections made.
10 • Review of the Project estimate and quantities to ensure efficient utilization of funds and control of Project costs.
• Assist in the development of a construction project schedule using the project plans and specifications.
Provide recommendations to ensure efficiency of Contractor operations and safe and expeditious completion of the Project.
TASK 5 DELIVERABLE(S):
• PS&E (65%, 95%, 100% (Pre-final)) (2-11”x17” plan sets) • Final (Bid Set) Plans (1 - 24”x36” Hardcopy and AutoCAD format) • Final (Bid Set) Specifications (Hardcopy and MS Word format) • Final Estimate (Hardcopy and MS Excel format)
• Draft and Final Storm Water Control Plan (SCP), including SMP, and Clean Bay Blueprint • Draft and Final Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) • Constructability Review Comments and Comment Resolutions for the 65% and 95% PS&E • All deliverables to be submitted electronically in .pdf format unless otherwise noted
Task 6. Design Support During Bidding
Construction bidding procedures are the responsibility of the City. Mark Thomas will provide engineering services to support the construction bidding phase of the project as described herein. The bid procurement duration is estimated to be three months after the project is advertised for construction.
Task 6.1. Bid Document Revisions
Mark Thomas and subconsultants will provide clarification of the design, provide information in response to bidders’ questions regarding the Bid Documents, and attend the pre-bid meeting and other meetings as requested by the City.
As the actual level of effort is unknown at this time a budget has been provided but this will be billed on an as-needed time and materials basis.
Task 6.2. Bid Addenda
Mark Thomas and subconsultants will prepare addenda to the Bid Documents, if requested by the City. As the actual level of effort is unknown at this time a budget has been provided but this will be billed on an as-needed time and materials basis.
TASK 6 DELIVERABLE(S):
• Bid document revisions as needed
• Addenda to bid document as needed
• Conformed Set
• All deliverables to be submitted electronically in .pdf format unless otherwise noted Project Assumptions
This scope of services is based on the following assumptions:
• The project will be advertised, awarded, and administered by the City and the City will coordinate reproductions of the bid package.
• This scope does not include an RE file.
• City will lead the effort to identify pavement section dig out and reconstruction areas to be shown on the plans.
• Roadway pavement will be reconstructed based on recommendations included in the 'Geotechnical Pavement Investigation 2022 West Las Positas Boulevard', dated June 6, 2022, by BSK Associates. No effort is included in this scope of work to support development of new pavement sections or mix designs. • Geotechnical services during construction will be provided by the City. • The City will lead the effort and will provide rights of entry to private property. The City will obtain and provide encroachment permits, at no fee, for work within public right of way. • A Record of Survey is not included in this scope of work. • Preparation of Plats and Legal Descriptions to support property acquisition and appraisals are not included in this scope
11 • Preparation of As-Built Drawings is not included in this scope of work. • Optional design services by Fehr & Peers, not included in this scope of service, but that may be completed for an additional fee to be negotiated prior to beginning work include the following:
o Corridor Lighting Analysis and addition of new lighting standards o Signal Interconnect & Communication Plans
o Temporary Signal Plans for Construction Staging
MILESTONE SCHEDULE
Milestone Estimated Completion
NTP for Final Design October 2025
Supplemental Surveys December 2025
Potholing Utilities January 2025
65% PS&E February 2026
95% PS&E May 2026
100% PS&E June 2026
Bid Plans and Specifications July 2026
Advertise and Award July 2026 to August 2026
Start of Construction September 2026
Principal
Sr. Project Manager
Project Manager
Sr. Project Engineer
Project Engineer
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Sr. Technician
LAUD Division
Manager
LAUD Project
Manager
Landscape Designer II
Landscape Designer I
Landscape Architect
Survey Division
Manager
Survey Manager I
Project Surveyor III
Asst Surveyor III
Lead Survey
Technician
Survey Technician III
2-Person Crew (OE3)
Division Manager -
CM
Resident Engineer
Asst. Resident
Engineer
Sr. Project
Accountant
Sr. Project
Coordinator
CirclePoint
Fehr & Peers
Crawford
Sub Mark-
Up
Choose Classification => Principal
Sr. Project
Manager
Project
Manager
Sr. Project
Engineer Project Engineer Design Engineer II Design En gineer I Sr.
Technician
LAUD
Division
Manager
LAUD
Project
Manager
Landscape
Designer II
Landscape
Designer I
Landscape
Architect
Survey
Division
Manager
Survey
Manager I
Project
Surveyor III
Asst
Surveyor III
Lead Survey
Technician
Survey
Technician
III
2-Person
Crew (OE3)
Division
Manager -
CM
Resident
Engineer
Asst.
Resident
Engineer
Sr. Project
Accountant
Sr. Project
Coordinator
Enter Staff Names if Necessary =>
Hourly Rate (average if classification, actual if named) => $150 $105 $84 $72 $63 $57 $47 $58 $96 $81 $46 $37 $61 $129 $81 $86 $58 $61 $55 $123 $129 $101 $90 $58 $56 $425 $339 $272 $232 $204 $186 $153 $187 $309 $261 $150 $119 $197 $416 $264 $280 $189 $198 $177 $399 $419 $326 $290 $188 $182 5%
1.0 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION
1.1 Project Management 12 16 28 $10,520 - - - $0 $10,520
1.2 Project Administration/Project Coordination 12 10 40 40 102 $23,292 - - - $0 $23,292
1.3 Project Meetings 12 32 12 32 16 16 16 136 $36,967 - - - $0 $36,967
1.6 Quality Control 4 12 54 40 16 126 $33,015 - - - $0 $33,015 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $850 - - - $850 Subtotal Phase 1 40 70 66 72 16 0 0 16 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 40 392 $104,644 $0 $0 $0 $0 $104,644
2.0 SITE INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS
2.1 Projet Initation and Data Gathering 2 4 20 16 16 58 $13,085 - - - $0 $13,085
2.2 Supplemental Topographic Surveys and Base Map
Preparation 2 5 16 4 4 16 4 16 40 50 157 $42,973 - - - $0 $4 2,973
2.4 Right of Way Exhibits 2 20 4 40 66 $13,568 - - - $0 $13,568
2.5 Utility Coordination 2 40 60 80 80 262 $49,266 - - - $0 $49,266
2.6 Potholing of Utilities 2 16 8 16 2 2 8 20 20 94 $23,593 - - - $0 $23,593 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $104,080 - - - $10 4,080 Subtotal Phase 2 2 12 0 101 84 116 96 40 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 24 4 16 60 70 0 0 0 0 0 637 $246,565 $0 $0 $0 $0 $246,565
4.0 ENVIORNMENTAL CLEARANCE
4.1 Project Management 0 $0 6,057 - - $303 $6,360
4.2 CEQA Clearance 4 6 16 26 $5,723 14,078 - - $704 $20,505 0 $0 - - - $0 $0 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 $0
Subtotal Phase 4 0 4 0 6 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 $5,723 $20,135 $0 $0 $1,007 $26,865
5.0 FINAL DESIGN
5.1 65% PS&E 4 40 160 160 200 160 60 784 $157,848 - - - $0 $157,848
5.2 95% PS&E 4 40 120 120 240 140 40 704 $141,038 - - - $0 $141,038
5.3 100% PS&E 2 24 80 80 80 80 24 370 $75,438 - - - $0 $75,438
5.4 Landscape Design 4 48 120 100 80 352 $59,403 - - - $0 $59,403
5.5 Signals, Lighting & Electrical Design 0 $0 - 79,920 - $3,996 $83,916
5.6 Draft and Final Storm Water Management Plan 2 22 8 28 36 96 $18,118 - - - $0 $18,118
5.7 Draft and Final SWPPP 2 4 4 10 $2,351 - - 5,350 $268 $7,968
5.8 Constructability Reviews 16 24 24 64 $21,494 - - - $0 $21,494 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 - - - $0 Subtotal Phase 5 10 108 0 386 368 552 416 124 4 48 120 100 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 24 24 0 0 2380 $475,690 $0 $79,920 $5,350 $4,264 $565,224
6.0 DESIGN SUPPORT DURING BIDDING
6.1 Bid Document Revisions 2 4 16 16 24 16 4 8 16 14 120 $22,988 - 4,180 - $209 $27,377
6.2 Bid Addenda 4 6 6 4 6 26 $5,808 - - - $0 $5,808 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 - - - $0 Subtotal Phase 6 2 8 0 22 16 30 16 0 0 8 14 16 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 $28,796 $0 $4,180 $0 $209 $33,185 TOTAL HOURS 54 202 66 587 484 714 528 180 4 72 134 116 110 6 6 24 4 16 60 70 16 24 24 40 40 3581 0 0 0 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $104,930 $19,082 $4,390 $0 $128,402
TOTAL COST $26,245.60 $68,430.07 $17,958.31 $136,468.23 $98,525.67 $132,679.30 $80,579.84 $33,740.18 $1,237.76 $18,803.52 $20,059.42 $13,855.25 $21,616.98 $2,498.19 $1,583.97 $6,716.93 $755.29 $3,162.43 $10,619.75 $27,948.57 $6,707.21 $7,815.36 $6,971.61 $7,530.22 $7,274.24 $861,418.30 $39,216.70 $88,490.00 $5,350.00 $5,479.25 $999,954.25 O. OPTIONAL TASKS
O.1 2.3 Boundary surveys and Mapping 2 8 40 16 8 16 20 110 $29,559 - - - $0 $29,559 OTHER DIRECT COSTS 0 $560 - - - $0 $560 Subtotal Optional Tasks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 40 16 8 16 20 0 0 0 0 0 110 $30,119 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,119 TOTAL HOURS - OPTIONAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 40 16 8 16 20 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 Anticipated Salary Increases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OTHER DIRECT COSTS - OPTIONAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL COST - OPTIONAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $833 $2,112 $11,195 $3,021 $1,581 $2,832 $7,985 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,119 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,119
TOTAL COST
COST PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT SCOPE - The City of Pleasanton: W. Las Positas - Phase II Environmental Clearance and Design Total MT Cost
Mark Thomas
Total
Hours
Subconsultants
Please note that the rates shown are for estimating purposes only. See rate schedule for actual rates/ranges. MT Fee (Non-FAR (R-1) Rates) 9/30/2025
Item #6
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
November 4, 2025
Finance
TITLE: ACCEPT THE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2025
SUMMARY
Attached is the City of Pleasanton monthly disbursements and the investment report for the month of September 2025.
RECOMMENDATION
Accept claim disbursements in the amount of $23,416,863 and the investment report for the month of September 2025.
BACKGROUND
The City's Investment Policy requires the Director of Finance to submit a monthly transaction report to the City Council within 60 days of the end of the reporting period in accordance with California Government Code Section 53607.
The Investment Policy also requires the Director of Finance to submit a quarterly report to the City Council on the status of the City's investment portfolio no later than 45 days after the end of each month. This report shall include the types of investments, the amount of money invested with various institutions, purchase and maturity dates, and yield on investments. The Director of Finance certifies that the investment portfolio complies with the investment policy and will meet cash flow needs for the next six months. This report also includes check and electronic payment information for September 2025.
DISCUSSION
The book value of the City of Pleasanton primary investment portfolio decreased by $29.9 million from $259.3 million to $229.4 million during the quarter ending September 30, 2025.
This decrease was primarily due to large disbursements to various vendors related to the new fiscal year (liability insurance premium, prepayment for unfunded pension liability, etc.). The fiscal year-to-date effective rate of return on the portfolio was 1.43 percent. The average days to maturity (ADM) increased from 318 days on June 30, 2025, to 497 days on September 30, 2025.
Local Agency Investment Fund
The City's investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) decreased to $36.5 million from $66.5 million last quarter ending June 30, 2025. The quarterly LAIF apportionment interest rate was 4.34 percent with ADM of 254 days. The average monthly effective yield was
4.21 percent in September, 4.25 percent in August, and 4.26 percent in July.
As of September 30, 2025, approximately 41.0 percent of the total portfolio consisted of Federal Agency Securities, while the LAIF Investment was 16.1 percent of the portfolio.
Corporate Notes accounted for 14.5 percent of the portfolio, Treasury Securities 24.0 percent, Government Money Market and Cash 2.0 percent, Supranationals 1.7 percent, Asset-Backed Securities 0.5 percent, and Certificates of Deposit 0.2 percent.
• Fair Market Value of total portfolio - $227,924,170
• Fiscal year-to-date effective rate of return - 1.43 percent • Weighted average days to maturity – 497 days
• Fiscal year-to-date net interest earnings - $865,854
Asset Composition
As of September 30, 2025, the effective rate of return is 1.43 percent.
The effective fiscal year rate of return on the portfolio was 1.43 percent, a decrease of 0.29 percent from 1.72 percent from last quarter and a decrease of 0.44 percent from 1.87 percent
reported at the same time last year.
As reported previously, the Federal Reserve (the Fed) has been raising interest rates since March 2022 but halted rate increases in July 2023. With the recent rate cut of 0.25 percent in September 2025, the Federal Funds Rate target range was lowered to 4.0 percent to 4.25 percent. Some of the securities in the City’s investment portfolio were purchased before the rate hikes, resulting in a lower investment return. The purchases and sales during the quarter were aimed to rebalance the portfolio, with the goal to achieving higher investment returns over time.
As of September 30, 2025, the entire portfolio, exclusive of CDs and LAIF was held in third- party safekeeping for the benefit of the City of Pleasanton at Bank of New York Mellon. Bank of New York Mellon is a contractual agent for the City.
As of September 30, 2025, all investments in the portfolio are authorized by State of California Government Section 53600 et. Seq. and the City's investment policy.
Securities rated below "AA-/AA3"
Purchases, Maturities, and Sells
During the quarter, the City's investment manager, Chandler Asset Management, purchased a number of securities on behalf of the City. Several securities were also sold/matured as presented in the tables below. Certain securities were sold at a loss with the intent of reinvesting the funds with higher yields, as these securities were purchased before COVID with much lower yields. Staff will continue to monitor cash inflows and outflows, taking into consideration anticipated construction costs for large capital projects and unexpected events.
Below is a list of all the trades that occurred during the quarter ending September 30, 2025.
Section 115 Trust Fund
In December 2018, the City Council approved the investment of $28.0 million of various reserves into a Section 115 Trust Fund to help smooth the pension liabilities, which are expected to grow in the long run. The investment is made in two separate portfolios: the first for $6.7 million in a Conservative portfolio which is available to pay the annual unfunded liabilities if necessary, and the second for $21.3 million in a long-term Capital Growth portfolio.
In February 2020, the City Council authorized Finance staff to deposit, and withdraw from, the Conservative portfolio an additional amount up to the total annual required CalPERS payment.
In March and December 2020, two additional $5.0 million contributions were deposited into the Conservative portfolio for a total of $16.7 million deposited into the Conservative portfolio.
As presented in the chart below, the Conservative portfolio balance was $21.3 million at the end of September 30, 2025, an increase of $0.4 million from the prior quarter. The Conservative portfolio investment return for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 was 2.16 percent, and the five-year annualized return was 4.15 percent.
The second portfolio (Capital Growth) addresses the longer-term pension liabilities with an initial investment of $21.3 million. The focus of this portfolio is to earn a higher rate of return over the next 10 years or so before the City needs to draw upon it.
The Capital Growth portfolio balance was $37.5 million at the end of September 30, 2025, an increase of $2.0 million from the prior quarter. The Capital Growth portfolio quarterly investment return was 5.93 percent, and the five-year annualized return was 9.72 percent.
The two portfolios total $58.8 million, which are held by a third party for the benefit of the City of Pleasanton at US Bank. US Bank is the contractual agent for PARS trust investments that are managed by PFM Asset Management (formerly Highmark Capital Management).
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Not applicable, as this item is a routine administrative matter of City business.
OUTREACH
No outreach was conducted, as this item is a routine administrative matter of City business.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Not applicable, as this item is a routine administrative matter.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with acceptance of this report.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Dawn DeMarcus, Senior
Budget and Finance Analyst
Susan Hsieh, Director of Finance
Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:
1. Disbursements & Investment Report
Attachment 1
September 2025 DISBURSEMENTS
CHECK REGISTER*
DATE CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT
9/4/2025 82504-82510 4,887,368$
9/5/2025 82522-82603 1,530,333
9/11/2025 82604-82623,82628-82736 2,160,010
9/18/2025 82752-82861 3,760,886
9/26/2025 82870-82966 1,149,467
13,488,064$
ACH PAYMENTS
DATE CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT
9/4/2025 82501-82503 1,101,091$
9/5/2025 82511-82521 361,504
9/11/2025 82624-82627 2,060,349
9/18/2025 82737-82751 1,263,042
9/26/2025 82862-82869 179,663
ACH debt payment - Fire Engine 138,916
ACH debt payment - Water Revenue Bond 421,875
Payroll & Tax related ACH Payments 886,888
6,413,329$
WIRE TRANSFERS AMOUNT
DATE
9/19/2025 Escrow Fee for Low Income Housing Assistance Program 40,000$
PAYROLL TRANSFERS
DATE AMOUNT
9/4/2025 1,794,237$
9/17/2025 1,681,233
3,475,470$
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 23,416,863$
* Detailed registers available upon request.
$227,924,170
1.43%
497
*Based on Market value
Total Market Value
Effective Rate of Return
Portfolio Snapshot
Average Days to Maturity
Portfolio Characteristics
September 30, 2025
- 20,000,000 40,000,000 60,000,000 80,000,000 100,000,000 120,000,0000-1 Yrs 1-2 Yrs 2-3 Yrs 3-4 Yrs 4-5 Yrs52.6%20.7%11.2%15.5%0.0%Maturity Distribution16.1%0.2%2.0%10.4%66.5%4.8%Assigned Credit Ratings of InvestmentsLAIFFDICCash & MoneyMarket FundsAAAAAA
0.2%16.1%2.0%14.5%24.0%1.3%39.7%1.7%0.5%Sector Allocation Certificates of Deposit - Bank
LAIF
Government Money Market & Cash
Medium Term Notes
Treasury Securities
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
Federal Agency Issues - Callable
Supranationals
Asset Backed Securities
CITY OF PLEASANTON
Portfolio Management
September 30, 2025
City of Pleasanton
Portfolio Summary
% of
Portfolio
Book
ValueInvestments
Market
Value
Par
Value
Days to
MaturityTerm
YTM
360 Equiv.
YTM
365 Equiv.
Certificates of Deposit - Bank 237,927.71 920.10 3.94551237,927.71237,927.71 4.000 LAIF 36,500,000.00 115.91 4.419136,486,202.4536,500,000.00 4.480 Gov't Money Market 4,554,667.96 11.99 4.05414,554,667.964,554,667.96 4.110 Medium Term Notes 33,300,405.00 1,46514.52 3.36789233,114,047.5033,000,000.00 3.414 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 2,995,657.09 1,8251.31 1.2624462,914,080.003,000,000.00 1.280 Treasury Securities - Coupon 53,937,644.58 1,08223.51 3.87198854,209,121.8053,680,000.00 3.925 Treasury Securities - Discount 488,737.74 1190.21 3.930118488,792.70495,000.00 3.985 Federal Agency Issues - Callable 91,921,335.36 1,78940.07 1.09727590,432,368.9592,040,000.00 1.112 Supranationals 3,960,210.00 1,1231.73 3.1566623,982,800.004,000,000.00 3.200 Asset Backed Securities 1,244,828.13 1,2580.54 4.0141,2091,249,768.271,245,000.00 4.070 Compounding CD's 254,392.57 3650.11 4.093192254,392.57254,392.57 4.150 229,395,806.14 100.00%
Investments
227,924,169.91229,006,988.24 1,235 497 2.732 2.770
Current Year
September 30
523,953.73
Fiscal Year To Date
865,854.33
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
229,188,857.97 240,696,237.59
1.43%2.78%
Total Earnings Month Ending
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, this report includes all investments in the cash management program, is in accordance with the City's current investment policy dated June 17, 2025 and will meet the City's cash flow needs for the next six months. Market value amounts are from Bank of New York Mellon (safekeeping bank) month-end statements. Book value amounts include premiums or discounts and are adjusted at year end on the general ledger. __________________________________________________ ____________________
SUSAN HSIEH, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Portfolio PLST
CC
Reporting period 09/01/2025-09/30/2025
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
10/23/2025
YTM
365
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Certificates of Deposit - Bank
4.000Fremont Bank1093-6 237,927.71 237,927.71 11/21/20254.00008/21/2025 237,927.71 3.9451093-6 51 237,927.71 3.945237,927.71237,927.71237,927.71Subtotal and Average 4.000 51 LAIF
4.480LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND5 36,500,000.00 36,500,000.00 4.48036,486,202.45 4.419SYS5 1 36,500,000.00 4.41936,486,202.4536,500,000.0036,500,000.00Subtotal and Average 4.480 1 Gov't Money Market
4.110Dryfus Govt Cash Mgmt 6727-1 4,408,547.23 4,408,547.23 4.1104,408,547.23 4.054X9USDCRGO 1
4.110Dryfus Govt Cash Mgmt 6727-2 146,120.73 146,120.73 4.110146,120.73 4.054X9USDCRGO 1 4,554,667.96 4.0544,554,667.964,554,667.964,737,286.36Subtotal and Average 4.110 1 Medium Term Notes
4.747ABBVIE INC.6079 500,000.00 500,950.00 03/15/20294.80002/20/2025 511,475.00 4.68200287YDS5 1,261
4.530American Express Corporation6125 1,000,000.00 999,420.00 07/20/20294.35107/25/2025 1,006,040.00 4.468025816EJ4 1,388
4.377Air Products and Chemicals, In6086 500,000.00 503,835.00 02/08/20294.60004/21/2025 509,090.00 4.317009158BH8 1,226
0.732Apple Inc.6065 2,000,000.00 1,996,860.00 02/08/20260.70002/08/2021 1,977,020.00 0.722037833EB2 130
0.981Apple Inc.6066 3,000,000.00 3,331,380.00 02/23/20263.25002/23/2021 2,990,610.00 0.967037833BY5 145
4.902BANK OF NEWYORK MELLON6074 500,000.00 493,470.00 02/01/20294.54301/15/2025 505,660.00 4.83506406RBN6 1,219
5.029Bank of America6076 500,000.00 484,830.00 07/23/20294.27101/15/2025 501,770.00 4.96006051GHM4 1,391
4.122Bank of America6118 750,000.00 733,402.50 12/20/20283.41907/23/2025 738,667.50 4.06606051GHD4 1,176
4.333Bank of America7010 250,000.00 249,435.00 07/23/20294.27107/22/2025 250,885.00 4.27406051GHM4 1,391
4.265CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES6095 500,000.00 501,455.00 10/15/20274.40006/17/2025 505,540.00 4.20714913UAR1 744
4.117CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES6105 1,000,000.00 1,005,920.00 10/15/20274.40007/22/2025 1,011,080.00 4.06014913UAR1 744
4.458Chubb Limited6088 500,000.00 503,710.00 08/15/20294.65004/21/2025 509,925.00 4.397171239AL0 1,414
4.322Cisco Systems, Inc.6089 500,000.00 509,240.00 02/26/20294.85004/21/2025 513,155.00 4.26317275RBR2 1,244
4.214Morgan Stanley Smith Barney6116 750,000.00 736,972.50 07/22/20283.59107/23/2025 742,282.50 4.15661744YAK4 1,025
4.378Duke Energy Corporation6090 500,000.00 491,355.00 07/15/20283.80004/22/2025 497,995.00 4.31826444HAE1 1,018
4.074Duke Energy Corporation6114 750,000.00 744,285.00 07/15/20283.80007/23/2025 746,992.50 4.01826444HAE1 1,018
4.329ELI LILLY & CO6082 500,000.00 502,955.00 02/12/20284.55003/20/2025 507,510.00 4.270532457CU0 864
4.962JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP6073 500,000.00 491,705.00 01/16/20294.50001/15/2025 507,555.00 4.89424422EXH7 1,203
4.218JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP6106 1,000,000.00 1,009,040.00 01/16/20294.50007/22/2025 1,015,110.00 4.16024422EXH7 1,203
1.100JPMorgan Chase Bank NA6068 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 06/22/20261.10006/22/2021 2,916,960.00 1.08546632FSCO 264
5.077JPMorgan Chase & CO6070 500,000.00 504,480.00 07/24/20295.29912/20/2024 515,235.00 5.00746647PDU7 1,392
4.591JPMorgan Chase & CO6107 250,000.00 256,410.00 07/24/20295.29907/22/2025 257,617.50 4.52846647PDU7 1,392 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
YTM
365
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Medium Term Notes
4.088JPMorgan Chase & CO6115 750,000.00 739,305.00 05/01/20283.54007/23/2025 743,535.00 4.03246647PAF3 943
4.391MET TOWER GLOBAL FUNDING6130 1,000,000.00 1,029,130.00 04/12/20295.25007/22/2025 1,034,330.00 4.33158989V2H6 1,289
4.465META PLATFORMS INC6081 500,000.00 496,715.00 08/15/20294.30003/20/2025 506,410.00 4.40430303M8S4 1,414
4.547MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC6091 500,000.00 496,995.00 03/15/20294.37505/23/2025 504,605.00 4.485571748BG6 1,261
4.226MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC6108 1,000,000.00 1,006,950.00 11/08/20274.55007/22/2025 1,011,370.00 4.168571748BY7 768
5.162MORGAN STANLEY6069 500,000.00 505,770.00 07/20/20295.44912/20/2024 516,615.00 5.09161747YFF7 1,388
4.800MORGAN STANLEY6133 250,000.00 257,092.50 07/20/20295.44907/22/2025 258,307.50 4.73461747YFF7 1,388
4.532PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP6083 500,000.00 501,095.00 01/31/20294.60003/20/2025 509,375.00 4.47069371RS80 1,218
4.590PROLOGIS LP6084 500,000.00 490,595.00 09/15/20284.00003/20/2025 500,080.00 4.52774340XBX8 1,080
4.243PROLOGIS LP6111 750,000.00 744,652.50 09/15/20284.00007/22/2025 750,120.00 4.18574340XBX8 1,080
4.268Pacific Service Electric & Gas6120 1,000,000.00 962,760.00 05/15/20293.20007/23/2025 969,610.00 4.21074456QBY1 1,322
4.854ROYAL BANK OF CANADA6080 500,000.00 501,950.00 01/24/20294.96502/20/2025 508,630.00 4.78778017DAA6 1,211
4.307Realty Income Corporation6128 1,000,000.00 1,014,460.00 02/15/20294.75007/23/2025 1,019,200.00 4.248 756109CF9 1,233
4.484State Street Corporation6092 500,000.00 493,045.00 12/03/20294.14105/23/2025 501,495.00 4.422857477BD4 1,524
4.528STATE STREET CORP6085 500,000.00 500,095.00 02/28/20284.53603/20/2025 506,455.00 4.466857477CU5 880
1.090Toyota Motor Credit Corp6067 1,500,000.00 1,479,570.00 01/09/20260.80003/09/2021 1,486,215.00 1.07589236THW8 100
4.192Toyota Motor Credit Corp6134 1,500,000.00 1,544,835.00 01/09/20304.95008/28/2025 1,545,465.00 4.13589236TNA9 1,561
4.741UNITED HEALTH GROUP INC.6078 500,000.00 485,910.00 05/15/20294.00002/20/2025 498,500.00 4.67691324PEH1 1,322
4.746U.S. Bancorp6087 500,000.00 498,370.00 02/01/20294.65304/22/2025 505,555.00 4.68191159HJK7 1,219 33,300,405.00 3.36733,114,047.5033,000,000.0033,300,405.00Subtotal and Average 3.414 892 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
1.280FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK3576 3,000,000.00 2,995,657.09 12/21/20261.25012/22/2021 2,914,080.00 1.2623130AQF65 446 2,995,657.09 1.2622,914,080.003,000,000.002,995,657.09Subtotal and Average 1.280 446 Treasury Securities - Coupon
4.331U S TREASURY2356 750,000.00 745,810.55 11/15/20274.12512/20/2024 757,762.50 4.27191282CLX7 775
3.433U S TREASURY2357 750,000.00 747,421.88 10/31/20264.12512/20/2024 753,225.00 3.38691282CLS8 395
4.476U S TREASURY2364 750,000.00 745,283.20 01/15/20284.25001/15/2025 760,312.50 4.41591282CMF5 836
4.549U S TREASURY2365 750,000.00 751,875.00 09/30/20284.62501/15/2025 771,240.00 4.48791282CJA0 1,095
3.748U S TREASURY2366 750,000.00 735,000.00 05/31/20283.62502/20/2025 750,232.50 3.69791282CHE4 973
4.305U S TREASURY2367 750,000.00 751,699.22 08/31/20284.37502/20/2025 765,412.50 4.24691282CHX2 1,065
4.078U S TREASURY2369 750,000.00 750,644.53 02/28/20274.12503/20/2025 754,545.00 4.02291282CMP3 515
4.053U S TREASURY2370 750,000.00 746,279.30 03/15/20283.87503/20/2025 754,860.00 3.99791282CMS7 896
3.859U S TREASURY2371 750,000.00 762,890.63 11/30/20284.37504/21/2025 766,350.00 3.80691282CJN2 1,156 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
YTM
365
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Treasury Securities - Coupon
3.803U S TREASURY2372 1,000,000.00 998,515.63 04/15/20283.75004/21/2025 1,003,240.00 3.75191282CMW8 927
3.805U S TREASURY2373 750,000.00 750,966.80 03/31/20273.87504/21/2025 752,287.50 3.75291282CMV0 546
4.061U S TREASURY2374 1,000,000.00 997,890.63 01/31/20294.00005/23/2025 1,011,060.00 4.00591282CJW2 1,218
4.005U S TREASURY2375 1,000,000.00 995,273.44 04/30/20273.75005/23/2025 1,001,560.00 3.95091282CMY4 576
4.123U S TREASURY2382 1,000,000.00 1,002,695.31 07/31/20264.37506/17/2025 1,004,810.00 4.06691282CLB5 303
3.871U S TREASURY2383 1,250,000.00 1,261,132.81 03/31/20294.12506/05/2025 1,269,237.50 3.81891282CKG5 1,277
4.202U S TREASURY2384 1,000,000.00 1,005,625.00 04/30/20264.87506/18/2025 1,005,870.00 4.14491282CKK6 211
3.899U S TREASURY2385 1,500,000.00 1,499,003.91 06/15/20283.87506/18/2025 1,510,080.00 3.84591282CNH0 988
4.276U S TREASURY2386 730,000.00 729,857.42 01/31/20264.25006/18/2025 730,554.80 4.21791282CJV4 122
3.860U S TREASURY2387 1,000,000.00 1,014,765.63 06/15/20274.62506/05/2025 1,016,020.00 3.80791282CKV2 622
3.953U S TREASURY2388 1,500,000.00 1,529,707.03 05/31/20294.50006/18/2025 1,542,420.00 3.89991282CKT7 1,338
3.314U S TREASURY2389 450,000.00 447,328.13 05/31/20283.62506/05/2025 450,139.50 3.26991282CHE4 973
4.395U S TREASURY2390 500,000.00 506,269.53 08/31/20284.37506/17/2025 510,275.00 4.33491282CHX2 1,065
3.954U S TREASURY2399 500,000.00 510,214.84 09/30/20284.62506/17/2025 514,160.00 3.90091282CJA0 1,095
4.038U S TREASURY2401 3,000,000.00 3,019,453.13 09/15/20264.62507/22/2025 3,025,230.00 3.98291282CHY0 349
3.950U S TREASURY2402 3,000,000.00 3,002,109.38 01/15/20274.00007/22/2025 3,011,490.00 3.89691282CJT9 471
3.832U S TREASURY2403 2,000,000.00 2,010,937.50 01/31/20294.00007/22/2025 2,022,120.00 3.78091282CJW2 1,218
3.851U S TREASURY2405 1,500,000.00 1,534,511.72 05/31/20294.50007/22/2025 1,542,420.00 3.79991282CKT7 1,338
3.984U S TREASURY2406 3,000,000.00 3,010,312.50 11/30/20264.25007/22/2025 3,017,940.00 3.93091282CLY5 425
3.793U S TREASURY2407 2,250,000.00 2,290,781.25 11/30/20284.37507/23/2025 2,299,050.00 3.74191282CJN2 1,156
3.813U S TREASURY2408 1,750,000.00 1,768,525.39 03/31/20294.12507/23/2025 1,776,932.50 3.76191282CKG5 1,277
3.835U S TREASURY2409 3,000,000.00 3,018,281.25 07/31/20294.00007/23/2025 3,033,990.00 3.78291282CLC3 1,399
3.854U S TREASURY2410 3,000,000.00 3,032,226.56 11/30/20294.12507/23/2025 3,048,990.00 3.80191282CMA6 1,521
3.777U S TREASURY2411 3,000,000.00 3,008,203.13 07/15/20283.87507/23/2025 3,019,920.00 3.72591282CNM9 1,018
3.618U S TREASURY2412 750,000.00 771,855.47 09/30/20284.62508/29/2025 771,240.00 3.56891282CJA0 1,095
3.693U S TREASURY2413 1,500,000.00 1,533,750.00 01/31/20304.25008/29/2025 1,532,175.00 3.64391282CMG3 1,583
4.221U S TREASURY2414 3,000,000.00 2,971,875.00 04/30/20303.50009/30/2025 2,971,890.00 4.16391282CGZ8 1,672
3.640U S TREASURY2415 3,000,000.00 2,978,671.88 09/15/20283.37509/30/2025 2,980,080.00 3.59091282CNY3 1,080 53,937,644.58 3.87154,209,121.8053,680,000.0048,275,431.69Subtotal and Average 3.925 988 Treasury Securities - Discount
3.985U S TREASURY2534 495,000.00 488,737.74 01/27/20263.82709/30/2025 488,792.70 3.930912797SH1 118 488,737.74 3.930488,792.70495,000.00179,042.89Subtotal and Average 3.985 118 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
YTM
365
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Federal Agency Issues - Callable
1.050FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK4575 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 03/25/20261.05003/25/2021 2,958,450.00 1.0363133EMUK6 175
0.921FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK4595 3,000,000.00 2,997,000.00 06/15/20260.90006/24/2021 2,941,470.00 0.9083133EMH21 257
0.595FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4553 3,000,000.00 2,996,250.00 11/25/20250.57011/25/2020 2,983,830.00 0.5873130AKGD2 55
0.110FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4558 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 02/12/20260.60002/12/2021 2,962,980.00 0.1093130AKXQ4 134
0.650FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4559 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 02/26/20260.65002/26/2021 2,959,920.00 0.6413130AKZ25 148
0.625FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4560 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 02/17/20260.62502/17/2021 2,962,890.00 0.6163130AL3S1 139
0.616FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4562 3,125,000.00 3,122,500.00 02/24/20260.60002/24/2021 3,083,218.75 0.6083130AKXJ0 146
0.750FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4563 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 02/24/20260.75002/24/2021 2,961,960.00 0.7403130ALCV4 146
0.800FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4565 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 03/16/20260.80003/16/2021 2,957,670.00 0.7893130ALDN1 166
0.993FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4578 3,000,000.00 2,998,050.00 03/30/20260.98003/30/2021 2,957,820.00 0.9803130ALNT7 180
1.051FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4580 3,000,000.00 2,995,500.00 04/15/20261.02004/15/2021 2,954,220.00 1.0363130ALUC6 196
1.020FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4585 2,795,000.00 2,795,000.00 05/19/20261.02005/20/2021 2,746,926.00 1.0063130AMCL4 230
0.987FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4588 3,000,000.00 2,998,950.00 05/26/20260.98005/26/2021 2,945,190.00 0.9743130AMGW6 237
0.901FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4590 2,750,000.00 2,746,562.50 05/26/20260.87506/02/2021 2,697,915.00 0.8883130AMHB1 237
1.030FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4592 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 06/30/20261.03006/30/2021 2,942,250.00 1.0163130AMSL7 272
1.070FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4594 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 06/30/20261.07006/30/2021 2,943,150.00 1.0553130AMYA4 272
1.025FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4597 3,000,000.00 2,999,250.00 07/14/20261.02007/14/2021 2,937,360.00 1.0113130AMWK4 286
1.033FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4598 3,000,000.00 2,983,500.00 09/30/20260.92009/30/2021 2,919,660.00 1.0193130AP2P9 364
1.085FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4599 3,000,000.00 2,997,750.00 10/14/20261.07010/14/2021 2,919,390.00 1.0713130APC94 378
1.421FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4600 530,000.00 526,947.20 11/24/20261.30012/09/2021 515,774.80 1.4013130APU78 419
1.421FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4601 1,840,000.00 1,829,401.60 11/24/20261.30012/09/2021 1,790,614.40 1.4013130APUR4 419
1.459FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4602 3,000,000.00 2,988,000.00 12/01/20261.37512/09/2021 2,920,650.00 1.4393130APVC6 426
1.370FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4603 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 12/30/20261.37012/30/2021 2,915,430.00 1.3513130AQEC3 455
1.385FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4604 3,000,000.00 2,998,500.00 12/30/20261.37512/30/2021 2,915,610.00 1.3663130AQEF6 455
1.425FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4605 3,000,000.00 2,999,250.00 12/29/20261.42001/03/2022 2,914,620.00 1.4063130AQG80 454
1.541FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4606 3,000,000.00 2,982,750.00 12/29/20261.42001/10/2022 2,914,620.00 1.5193130AQG80 454
1.926FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4607 3,000,000.00 2,975,010.00 01/28/20271.75002/08/2022 2,926,050.00 1.9003130AQLD3 484
2.112FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK4608 3,000,000.00 2,995,500.00 02/25/20272.08003/08/2022 2,933,820.00 2.0833130AQW66 512
0.600FREDDIE MAC4550 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 10/28/20250.60010/28/2020 2,992,140.00 0.5923134GW3F1 27
0.620FREDDIE MAC4554 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 12/01/20250.62012/01/2020 2,982,870.00 0.6123134GXDM3 61
0.550FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSN4556 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 01/28/20260.55001/28/2021 2,967,210.00 0.5423135G06R9 119
3.823U S TREASURY4610 3,000,000.00 2,995,664.06 08/15/20273.75007/23/2025 3,006,690.00 3.77091282CLG4 683 91,921,335.36 1.09790,432,368.9592,040,000.0097,933,231.36Subtotal and Average 1.112 275 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
YTM
365
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Supranationals
3.975INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONST7005 2,000,000.00 1,972,780.00 07/12/20283.50006/18/2025 1,990,740.00 3.921459058KT9 1,015
0.935International Finance Corp7000 1,000,000.00 980,200.00 02/26/20260.50006/28/2021 984,860.00 0.92245950VPS9 148
3.886International Finance Corp7011 1,000,000.00 1,007,230.00 01/15/20274.37506/30/2025 1,007,200.00 3.83345950KDF4 471 3,960,210.00 3.1563,982,800.004,000,000.003,960,210.00Subtotal and Average 3.200 662 Asset Backed Securities
4.473BMW Vehicle Owner Trust7007 175,000.00 174,996.15 06/26/20284.43006/10/2025 176,366.17 4.411096912AD2 999
4.404Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust7006 265,000.00 264,976.07 12/17/20294.36006/11/2025 267,569.89 4.34444935XAD7 1,538
3.872Toyota Lease Owner Trust7013 805,000.00 804,855.91 11/20/20283.96009/17/2025 805,832.21 3.81989240NAD4 1,146 1,244,828.13 4.0141,249,768.271,245,000.00815,571.64Subtotal and Average 4.070 1,209 Compounding CD's
4.150United Business BankSYS 1091-3 254,392.57 254,392.57 04/11/20264.15004/11/2025 254,392.57 4.093SYS 1091-3 192 254,392.57 4.093254,392.57254,392.57254,094.23Subtotal and Average 4.150 192
2.732229,188,857.97 229,006,988.24 2.770 497227,924,169.91 229,395,806.14Total and Average Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
YTM
365
Par Value Book Value
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details - Cash
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Gov't Money Market
0.000BANK OF NEWYORK MELLON7-3 0.00 0.0007/01/2025 0.00 0.000SYS CASH 1
0.00 2.732229,188,857.97 229,006,988.24 2.770 497
0Average Balance
227,924,169.91 229,395,806.14Total Cash and Investments Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Accrued
InterestMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details with Earnings - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Days To
Maturity
Unrealized
Gain/Loss
Current
Rate YTM
Certificates of Deposit - Bank
FREMON1093-6 237,927.71 237,927.71 11/21/202508/21/2025 237,927.711093-6 1,069.04 0.004.0004.000 51 237,927.71237,927.71237,927.71237,927.71Subtotal and Average 1,069.04 0.0051 4.0004.000 LAIF
LAIF5 36,500,000.00 36,500,000.0036,486,202.45SYS5 473,431.93 -13,797.554.4804.480 1 36,500,000.0036,486,202.4536,500,000.0036,500,000.00Subtotal and Average 473,431.93 -13,797.551 4.4804.480 Gov't Money Market
DRYFUS7-1 4,408,547.23 4,408,547.234,408,547.23X9USDCRGO 15,417.53 0.004.1104.110 1 DRYFUS7-2 146,120.73 146,120.73146,120.73X9USDCRGO 12,693.45 0.004.1104.110 1 4,554,667.964,554,667.964,554,667.964,737,286.36Subtotal and Average 28,110.98 0.001 4.1104.110 Medium Term Notes
ABBVIE6079 500,000.00 500,950.00 03/15/202902/20/2025 511,475.0000287YDS5 1,066.67 10,525.004.7474.800 1261 AMEX6125 1,000,000.00 999,420.00 07/20/202907/25/2025 1,006,040.00025816EJ4 7,976.83 6,620.004.5304.351 1388 APC6086 500,000.00 503,835.00 02/08/202904/21/2025 509,090.00009158BH8 3,386.11 5,255.004.3764.600 1226 APPL6065 2,000,000.00 1,996,860.00 02/08/202602/08/2021 1,977,020.00037833EB2 2,061.11 -19,840.000.7320.700 130 APPL6066 3,000,000.00 3,331,380.00 02/23/202602/23/2021 2,990,610.00037833BY5 10,291.67 -340,770.000.9803.250 145 BNYT6074 500,000.00 493,470.00 02/01/202901/15/2025 505,660.0006406RBN6 3,765.26 12,190.004.9024.543 1219 BOFA6076 500,000.00 484,830.00 07/23/202901/15/2025 501,770.0006051GHM4 4,062.09 16,940.005.0294.271 1391 BOFA6118 750,000.00 733,402.50 12/20/202807/23/2025 738,667.5006051GHD4 4,914.81 5,265.004.1223.419 1176 BOFA7010 250,000.00 249,435.00 07/23/202907/22/2025 250,885.0006051GHM4 2,031.05 1,450.004.3334.271 1391 CATERP6095 500,000.00 501,455.00 10/15/202706/17/2025 505,540.0014913UAR1 10,144.44 4,085.004.2644.400 744 CATERP6105 1,000,000.00 1,005,920.00 10/15/202707/22/2025 1,011,080.0014913UAR1 20,288.89 5,160.004.1164.400 744 CHUBB6088 500,000.00 503,710.00 08/15/202904/21/2025 509,925.00171239AL0 2,970.83 6,215.004.4574.650 1414 CISCO6089 500,000.00 509,240.00 02/26/202904/21/2025 513,155.0017275RBR2 2,357.64 3,915.004.3214.850 1244 CITI6116 750,000.00 736,972.50 07/22/202807/23/2025 742,282.5061744YAK4 5,162.06 5,310.004.2133.591 1025 DUKE E6090 500,000.00 491,355.00 07/15/202804/22/2025 497,995.0026444HAE1 4,011.11 6,640.004.3783.800 1018 DUKE E6114 750,000.00 744,285.00 07/15/202807/23/2025 746,992.5026444HAE1 6,016.67 2,707.504.0743.800 1018 ELI LI6082 500,000.00 502,955.00 02/12/202803/20/2025 507,510.00532457CU0 3,096.53 4,555.004.3294.550 864 JDCC6073 500,000.00 491,705.00 01/16/202901/15/2025 507,555.0024422EXH7 4,707.88 15,850.004.9624.500 1203 JDCC6106 1,000,000.00 1,009,040.00 01/16/202907/22/2025 1,015,110.0024422EXH7 9,415.76 6,070.004.2184.500 1203 JP6068 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 06/22/202606/22/2021 2,916,960.0046632FSCO 9,075.00 -83,040.001.1001.100 264 JPMCC6070 500,000.00 504,480.00 07/24/202912/20/2024 515,235.0046647PDU7 4,931.01 10,755.005.0765.299 1392 JPMCC6107 250,000.00 256,410.00 07/24/202907/22/2025 257,617.5046647PDU7 2,465.51 1,207.504.5905.299 1392 JPMCC6115 750,000.00 739,305.00 05/01/202807/23/2025 743,535.0046647PAF3 11,062.50 4,230.004.0873.540 943 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM8) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Accrued
InterestMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details with Earnings - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Days To
Maturity
Unrealized
Gain/Loss
Current
Rate YTM
Medium Term Notes
MET6130 1,000,000.00 1,029,130.00 04/12/202907/22/2025 1,034,330.0058989V2H6 24,645.83 5,200.004.3915.250 1289 METAPF6081 500,000.00 496,715.00 08/15/202903/20/2025 506,410.0030303M8S4 2,747.22 9,695.004.4654.300 1414 MMC6091 500,000.00 496,995.00 03/15/202905/23/2025 504,605.00571748BG6 972.22 7,610.004.5464.375 1261 MMC6108 1,000,000.00 1,006,950.00 11/08/202707/22/2025 1,011,370.00571748BY7 18,073.61 4,420.004.2264.550 768 MS6069 500,000.00 505,770.00 07/20/202912/20/2024 516,615.0061747YFF7 5,373.32 10,845.005.1615.449 1388 MS6133 250,000.00 257,092.50 07/20/202907/22/2025 258,307.5061747YFF7 2,686.66 1,215.004.8005.449 1388 PCAR6083 500,000.00 501,095.00 01/31/202903/20/2025 509,375.0069371RS80 3,897.22 8,280.004.5324.600 1218 PROLOG6084 500,000.00 490,595.00 09/15/202803/20/2025 500,080.0074340XBX8 888.89 9,485.004.5894.000 1080 PROLOG6111 750,000.00 744,652.50 09/15/202807/22/2025 750,120.0074340XBX8 1,333.33 5,467.504.2424.000 1080 PSEG6120 1,000,000.00 962,760.00 05/15/202907/23/2025 969,610.0074456QBY1 12,088.89 6,850.004.2673.200 1322 RBC6080 500,000.00 501,950.00 01/24/202902/20/2025 508,630.0078017DAA6 4,620.21 6,680.004.8534.965 1211 RIC6128 1,000,000.00 1,014,460.00 02/15/202907/23/2025 1,019,200.00 756109CF9 6,069.44 4,740.004.3064.750 1233 SSC6092 500,000.00 493,045.00 12/03/202905/23/2025 501,495.00857477BD4 6,786.64 8,450.004.4834.141 1524 STESTR6085 500,000.00 500,095.00 02/28/202803/20/2025 506,455.00857477CU5 2,079.00 6,360.004.5284.536 880 TOYOTA6067 1,500,000.00 1,479,570.00 01/09/202603/09/2021 1,486,215.0089236THW8 2,799.99 6,645.001.0900.800 100 TOYOTA6134 1,500,000.00 1,544,835.00 01/09/203008/28/2025 1,545,465.0089236TNA9 16,912.50 630.004.1924.950 1561 UHGI6078 500,000.00 485,910.00 05/15/202902/20/2025 498,500.0091324PEH1 7,555.56 12,590.004.7404.000 1322 USBANC6087 500,000.00 498,370.00 02/01/202904/22/2025 505,555.0091159HJK7 3,877.50 7,185.004.7464.653 1219 33,300,405.0033,114,047.5033,000,000.0033,300,405.00Subtotal and Average 258,669.46 -186,357.50892 3.4143.617 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
FHLB3576 3,000,000.00 2,995,657.09 12/21/202612/22/2021 2,914,080.003130AQF65 10,416.66 -81,577.091.2801.250 446 2,995,657.092,914,080.003,000,000.002,995,657.09Subtotal and Average 10,416.66 -81,577.09446 1.2801.250 Treasury Securities - Coupon
UST2356 750,000.00 745,810.55 11/15/202712/20/2024 757,762.5091282CLX7 11,685.63 11,951.954.3304.125 775 UST2357 750,000.00 747,421.88 10/31/202612/20/2024 753,225.0091282CLS8 13,017.43 5,803.123.4334.125 395 UST2364 750,000.00 745,283.20 01/15/202801/15/2025 760,312.5091282CMF5 6,756.11 15,029.304.4764.250 836 UST2365 750,000.00 751,875.00 09/30/202801/15/2025 771,240.0091282CJA0 95.82 19,365.004.5494.625 1095 UST2366 750,000.00 735,000.00 05/31/202802/20/2025 750,232.5091282CHE4 9,161.01 15,232.503.7473.625 973 UST2367 750,000.00 751,699.22 08/31/202802/20/2025 765,412.5091282CHX2 3,031.59 13,713.284.3044.375 1065 UST2369 750,000.00 750,644.53 02/28/202703/20/2025 754,545.0091282CMP3 2,649.34 3,900.474.0774.125 515 UST2370 750,000.00 746,279.30 03/15/202803/20/2025 754,860.0091282CMS7 1,284.53 8,580.704.0523.875 896 UST2371 750,000.00 762,890.63 11/30/202804/21/2025 766,350.0091282CJN2 11,027.15 3,459.373.8594.375 1156 UST2372 1,000,000.00 998,515.63 04/15/202804/21/2025 1,003,240.0091282CMW8 17,315.57 4,724.373.8023.750 927 UST2373 750,000.00 750,966.80 03/31/202704/21/2025 752,287.5091282CMV0 79.84 1,320.703.8043.875 546 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM8) 7.3.11
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Accrued
InterestMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details with Earnings - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Days To
Maturity
Unrealized
Gain/Loss
Current
Rate YTM
Treasury Securities - Coupon
UST2374 1,000,000.00 997,890.63 01/31/202905/23/2025 1,011,060.0091282CJW2 6,739.13 13,169.374.0604.000 1218 UST2375 1,000,000.00 995,273.44 04/30/202705/23/2025 1,001,560.0091282CMY4 15,692.93 6,286.564.0043.750 576 UST2382 1,000,000.00 1,002,695.31 07/31/202606/17/2025 1,004,810.0091282CLB5 7,370.92 2,114.694.1224.375 303 UST2383 1,250,000.00 1,261,132.81 03/31/202906/05/2025 1,269,237.5091282CKG5 141.66 8,104.693.8704.125 1277 UST2384 1,000,000.00 1,005,625.00 04/30/202606/18/2025 1,005,870.0091282CKK6 20,400.82 245.004.2014.875 211 UST2385 1,500,000.00 1,499,003.91 06/15/202806/18/2025 1,510,080.0091282CNH0 17,151.64 11,076.093.8983.875 988 UST2386 730,000.00 729,857.42 01/31/202606/18/2025 730,554.8091282CJV4 5,227.03 697.384.2754.250 122 UST2387 1,000,000.00 1,014,765.63 06/15/202706/05/2025 1,016,020.0091282CKV2 36,772.54 1,254.373.8604.625 622 UST2388 1,500,000.00 1,529,707.03 05/31/202906/18/2025 1,542,420.0091282CKT7 22,684.43 12,712.973.9534.500 1338 UST2389 450,000.00 447,328.13 05/31/202806/05/2025 450,139.5091282CHE4 5,496.60 2,811.373.3143.625 973 UST2390 500,000.00 506,269.53 08/31/202806/17/2025 510,275.0091282CHX2 2,021.06 4,005.474.3944.375 1065 UST2399 500,000.00 510,214.84 09/30/202806/17/2025 514,160.0091282CJA0 63.88 3,945.163.9534.625 1095 UST2401 3,000,000.00 3,019,453.13 09/15/202607/22/2025 3,025,230.0091282CHY0 6,132.60 5,776.874.0374.625 349 UST2402 3,000,000.00 3,002,109.38 01/15/202707/22/2025 3,011,490.0091282CJT9 25,434.78 9,380.623.9504.000 471 UST2403 2,000,000.00 2,010,937.50 01/31/202907/22/2025 2,022,120.0091282CJW2 13,478.26 11,182.503.8324.000 1218 UST2405 1,500,000.00 1,534,511.72 05/31/202907/22/2025 1,542,420.0091282CKT7 22,684.43 7,908.283.8514.500 1338 UST2406 3,000,000.00 3,010,312.50 11/30/202607/22/2025 3,017,940.0091282CLY5 42,848.36 7,627.503.9844.250 425 UST2407 2,250,000.00 2,290,781.25 11/30/202807/23/2025 2,299,050.0091282CJN2 33,081.45 8,268.753.7934.375 1156 UST2408 1,750,000.00 1,768,525.39 03/31/202907/23/2025 1,776,932.5091282CKG5 198.32 8,407.113.8134.125 1277 UST2409 3,000,000.00 3,018,281.25 07/31/202907/23/2025 3,033,990.0091282CLC3 20,217.39 15,708.753.8344.000 1399 UST2410 3,000,000.00 3,032,226.56 11/30/202907/23/2025 3,048,990.0091282CMA6 41,588.11 16,763.443.8534.125 1521 UST2411 3,000,000.00 3,008,203.13 07/15/202807/23/2025 3,019,920.0091282CNM9 24,639.95 11,716.873.7763.875 1018 UST2412 750,000.00 771,855.47 09/30/202808/29/2025 771,240.0091282CJA0 95.82 -615.473.6174.625 1095 UST2413 1,500,000.00 1,533,750.00 01/31/203008/29/2025 1,532,175.0091282CMG3 10,740.49 -1,575.003.6934.250 1583 UST2414 3,000,000.00 2,971,875.00 04/30/203009/30/2025 2,971,890.0091282CGZ8 43,940.22 15.004.2203.500 1672 UST2415 3,000,000.00 2,978,671.88 09/15/202809/30/2025 2,980,080.0091282CNY3 4,475.14 1,408.123.6403.375 1080 53,937,644.5854,209,121.8053,680,000.0048,275,431.69Subtotal and Average 505,421.98 271,477.22988 3.9254.106 Treasury Securities - Discount
UST2534 495,000.00 488,737.74 01/27/202609/30/2025 488,792.70912797SH1 52.62 54.963.9303.827 118 488,737.74488,792.70495,000.00179,042.89Subtotal and Average 52.62 54.96118 3.9303.827 Federal Agency Issues - Callable
FFCB4575 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 03/25/202603/25/2021 2,958,450.003133EMUK6 525.00 -41,550.001.0501.050 175 FFCB4595 3,000,000.00 2,997,000.00 06/15/202606/24/2021 2,941,470.003133EMH21 7,950.00 -55,530.000.9200.900 257 FHLB4553 3,000,000.00 2,996,250.00 11/25/202511/25/2020 2,983,830.003130AKGD2 5,985.00 -12,420.000.5950.570 55 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM8) 7.3.11
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Accrued
InterestMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details with Earnings - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Days To
Maturity
Unrealized
Gain/Loss
Current
Rate YTM
Federal Agency Issues - Callable
FHLB4558 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 02/12/202602/12/2021 2,962,980.003130AKXQ4 2,450.00 -37,020.000.1100.600 134 FHLB4559 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 02/26/202602/26/2021 2,959,920.003130AKZ25 1,895.83 -40,080.000.6500.650 148 FHLB4560 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 02/17/202602/17/2021 2,962,890.003130AL3S1 2,291.67 -37,110.000.6250.625 139 FHLB4562 3,125,000.00 3,122,500.00 02/24/202602/24/2021 3,083,218.753130AKXJ0 1,927.08 -39,281.250.6160.600 146 FHLB4563 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 02/24/202602/24/2021 2,961,960.003130ALCV4 2,312.50 -38,040.000.7500.750 146 FHLB4565 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 03/16/202603/16/2021 2,957,670.003130ALDN1 1,000.00 -42,330.000.8000.800 166 FHLB4578 3,000,000.00 2,998,050.00 03/30/202603/30/2021 2,957,820.003130ALNT7 81.67 -40,230.000.9930.980 180 FHLB4580 3,000,000.00 2,995,500.00 04/15/202604/15/2021 2,954,220.003130ALUC6 14,110.00 -41,280.001.0501.020 196 FHLB4585 2,795,000.00 2,795,000.00 05/19/202605/20/2021 2,746,926.003130AMCL4 10,453.30 -48,074.001.0191.020 230 FHLB4588 3,000,000.00 2,998,950.00 05/26/202605/26/2021 2,945,190.003130AMGW6 10,208.33 -53,760.000.9870.980 237 FHLB4590 2,750,000.00 2,746,562.50 05/26/202606/02/2021 2,697,915.003130AMHB1 8,355.03 -48,647.500.9000.875 237 FHLB4592 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 06/30/202606/30/2021 2,942,250.003130AMSL7 7,810.83 -57,750.001.0301.030 272 FHLB4594 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 06/30/202606/30/2021 2,943,150.003130AMYA4 8,114.17 -56,850.001.0701.070 272 FHLB4597 3,000,000.00 2,999,250.00 07/14/202607/14/2021 2,937,360.003130AMWK4 6,545.00 -61,890.001.0251.020 286 FHLB4598 3,000,000.00 2,983,500.00 09/30/202609/30/2021 2,919,660.003130AP2P9 76.67 -63,840.001.0330.920 364 FHLB4599 3,000,000.00 2,997,750.00 10/14/202610/14/2021 2,919,390.003130APC94 14,890.83 -78,360.001.0851.070 378 FHLB4600 530,000.00 526,947.20 11/24/202612/09/2021 515,774.803130APU78 2,430.64 -11,172.401.4201.300 419 FHLB4601 1,840,000.00 1,829,401.60 11/24/202612/09/2021 1,790,614.403130APUR4 8,438.44 -38,787.201.4201.300 419 FHLB4602 3,000,000.00 2,988,000.00 12/01/202612/09/2021 2,920,650.003130APVC6 13,750.00 -67,350.001.4581.375 426 FHLB4603 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 12/30/202612/30/2021 2,915,430.003130AQEC3 30,939.17 -84,570.001.3701.370 455 FHLB4604 3,000,000.00 2,998,500.00 12/30/202612/30/2021 2,915,610.003130AQEF6 31,052.08 -82,890.001.3851.375 455 FHLB4605 3,000,000.00 2,999,250.00 12/29/202601/03/2022 2,914,620.003130AQG80 10,886.67 -84,630.001.4251.420 454 FHLB4606 3,000,000.00 2,982,750.00 12/29/202601/10/2022 2,914,620.003130AQG80 10,886.67 -68,130.001.5401.420 454 FHLB4607 3,000,000.00 2,975,010.00 01/28/202702/08/2022 2,926,050.003130AQLD3 9,187.50 -48,960.001.9261.750 484 FHLB4608 3,000,000.00 2,995,500.00 02/25/202703/08/2022 2,933,820.003130AQW66 6,240.00 -61,680.002.1112.080 512 FHLMC4550 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 10/28/202510/28/2020 2,992,140.003134GW3F1 7,650.00 -7,860.000.6000.600 27 FHLMC4554 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 12/01/202512/01/2020 2,982,870.003134GXDM3 6,200.00 -17,130.000.6200.620 61 FNMA4556 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 01/28/202601/28/2021 2,967,210.003135G06R9 2,887.50 -32,790.000.5500.550 119 UST4610 3,000,000.00 2,995,664.06 08/15/202707/23/2025 3,006,690.0091282CLG4 14,368.21 11,025.943.8223.750 683 91,921,335.3690,432,368.9592,040,000.0097,933,231.36Subtotal and Average 261,899.79 -1,488,966.41275 1.1121.100 Supranationals
IBFRAD7005 2,000,000.00 1,972,780.00 07/12/202806/18/2025 1,990,740.00459058KT9 15,361.11 17,960.003.9753.500 1015 IFC7000 1,000,000.00 980,200.00 02/26/202606/28/2021 984,860.0045950VPS9 486.11 4,660.000.9350.500 148 IFC7011 1,000,000.00 1,007,230.00 01/15/202706/30/2025 1,007,200.0045950KDF4 9,231.11 -30.003.8864.375 471 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM8) 7.3.11
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Accrued
InterestMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details with Earnings - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Days To
Maturity
Unrealized
Gain/Loss
Current
Rate YTM
3,960,210.003,982,800.004,000,000.003,960,210.00Subtotal and Average 25,078.33 22,590.00662 3.2002.980 Asset Backed Securities
BMW7007 175,000.00 174,996.15 06/26/202806/10/2025 176,366.17096912AD2 108.78 1,370.024.4724.430 999 HYU7006 265,000.00 264,976.07 12/17/202906/11/2025 267,569.8944935XAD7 488.24 2,593.824.4044.360 1538 TOYLOT7013 805,000.00 804,855.91 11/20/202809/17/2025 805,832.2189240NAD4 578.53 976.303.8723.960 1146 1,244,828.131,249,768.271,245,000.00815,571.64Subtotal and Average 1,175.55 4,940.141209 4.0704.111 Compounding CD's
VCBSYS 1091-3 254,392.57 254,392.57 04/11/202604/11/2025 254,392.57SYS 1091-3 578.48 0.004.1504.150 192 254,392.57254,392.57254,392.57254,094.23Subtotal and Average 578.48 0.00192 4.1504.150 229,006,988.24 227,924,169.91 229,395,806.14 2.833 497 2.770 1,565,904.82 -1,471,636.23229,188,857.97Total and Average Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM8) 7.3.11
Par Value Book Value
Accrued
InterestMarket Value
September 30, 2025
Portfolio Details with Earnings - Cash
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CUSIP Investment #
Purchase
Date
Days To
Maturity
Unrealized
Gain/Loss
Current
Rate YTM
Gov't Money Market
BNYT7-3 0.00 0.0007/01/2025 0.00SYS CASH 0.00 0.000.0000.000 1 229,006,988.24 227,924,169.91 229,395,806.14 2.833 497 2.770 1,565,904.82 -1,471,636.23
0.00 229,188,857.97
Average Balance
Total Cash and Investments
Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM8) 7.3.11
Par Value
Stated
Rate
September 30, 2025
Investment Status Report - Investments
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
CITY OF PLEASANTON
S&P
YTM
Moody'sCUSIP Investment # Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
Certificates of Deposit - Bank
FREMON1093-6 237,927.71 237,927.714.00011/21/20251093-6 08/21/2025 237,927.714.000 237,927.71Certificates of Deposit - Bank Totals 237,927.710.004.000237,927.71 LAIF
LAIF5 36,500,000.00 36,500,000.004.480SYS5 36,500,000.004.480 36,500,000.00LAIF Totals 36,500,000.000.004.48036,500,000.00 Gov't Money Market
DRYFUS7-1 4,408,547.23 4,408,547.234.110X9USDCRGO 4,408,547.234.110 DRYFUS7-2 146,120.73 146,120.734.110X9USDCRGO 146,120.734.110 4,554,667.96Gov't Money Market Totals 4,554,667.960.004.1104,554,667.96 Medium Term Notes
ABBVIE6079 500,000.00 500,950.004.80003/15/202900287YDS5 A Received02/20/2025 500,950.00A4.747 AMEX6125 1,000,000.00 999,420.004.35107/20/2029025816EJ4 Aaa07/25/2025 999,420.00A4.530 APC6086 500,000.00 503,835.004.60002/08/2029009158BH8 A Received04/21/2025 503,835.00A4.377 APPL6065 2,000,000.00 1,996,860.000.70002/08/2026037833EB2 Aaa02/08/2021 1,996,860.00AA0.732 APPL6066 3,000,000.00 3,331,380.003.25002/23/2026037833BY5 Aaa02/23/2021 3,331,380.00AA0.981 BNYT6074 500,000.00 493,470.004.54302/01/202906406RBN6 Aa Received01/15/2025 493,470.00A4.902 BOFA6076 500,000.00 484,830.004.27107/23/202906051GHM4 A Received01/15/2025 484,830.00A5.029 BOFA6118 750,000.00 733,402.503.41912/20/202806051GHD4 A Received07/23/2025 733,402.50A4.122 BOFA7010 250,000.00 249,435.004.27107/23/202906051GHM4 A Received07/22/2025 249,435.00A4.333 CATERP6095 500,000.00 501,455.004.40010/15/202714913UAR1 A Received06/17/2025 501,455.00A4.265 CATERP6105 1,000,000.00 1,005,920.004.40010/15/202714913UAR1 A Received07/22/2025 1,005,920.00A4.117 CHUBB6088 500,000.00 503,710.004.65008/15/2029171239AL0 A Received04/21/2025 503,710.00A4.458 CISCO6089 500,000.00 509,240.004.85002/26/202917275RBR2 A Received04/21/2025 509,240.00AA4.322 CITI6116 750,000.00 736,972.503.59107/22/202861744YAK4 A Received07/23/2025 736,972.50A4.214 DUKE E6090 500,000.00 491,355.003.80007/15/202826444HAE1 A Received04/22/2025 491,355.00A4.378 DUKE E6114 750,000.00 744,285.003.80007/15/202826444HAE1 A Received07/23/2025 744,285.00A4.074 ELI LI6082 500,000.00 502,955.004.55002/12/2028532457CU0 Aa Received03/20/2025 502,955.00A4.329 JDCC6073 500,000.00 491,705.004.50001/16/202924422EXH7 A Received01/15/2025 491,705.00A4.962 JDCC6106 1,000,000.00 1,009,040.004.50001/16/202924422EXH7 A Received07/22/2025 1,009,040.00A4.218 JP6068 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.001.10006/22/202646632FSCO Aa06/22/2021 3,000,000.00AA1.100 JPMCC6070 500,000.00 504,480.005.29907/24/202946647PDU7 A Received12/20/2024 504,480.00A5.077 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
Par Value
Stated
Rate
September 30, 2025
Investment Status Report - Investments
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
CITY OF PLEASANTON
S&P
YTM
Moody'sCUSIP Investment # Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
Medium Term Notes
JPMCC6107 250,000.00 256,410.005.29907/24/202946647PDU7 A Received07/22/2025 256,410.00A4.591 JPMCC6115 750,000.00 739,305.003.54005/01/202846647PAF3 A Received07/23/2025 739,305.00A4.088 MET6130 1,000,000.00 1,029,130.005.25004/12/202958989V2H6 Aaa Received07/22/2025 1,029,130.00AA4.391 METAPF6081 500,000.00 496,715.004.30008/15/202930303M8S4 Aa Received03/20/2025 496,715.00AA4.465 MMC6091 500,000.00 496,995.004.37503/15/2029571748BG6 A Received05/23/2025 496,995.00A4.547 MMC6108 1,000,000.00 1,006,950.004.55011/08/2027571748BY7 Aaa Received07/22/2025 1,006,950.00A4.226 MS6069 500,000.00 505,770.005.44907/20/202961747YFF7 A Received12/20/2024 505,770.00A5.162 MS6133 250,000.00 257,092.505.44907/20/202961747YFF7 A Received07/22/2025 257,092.50A4.800 PCAR6083 500,000.00 501,095.004.60001/31/202969371RS80 A Received03/20/2025 501,095.00A4.532 PROLOG6084 500,000.00 490,595.004.00009/15/202874340XBX8 A Received03/20/2025 490,595.00A4.590 PROLOG6111 750,000.00 744,652.504.00009/15/202874340XBX8 A Received07/22/2025 744,652.50A4.243 PSEG6120 1,000,000.00 962,760.003.20005/15/202974456QBY1 Aa Received07/23/2025 962,760.00A4.268 RBC6080 500,000.00 501,950.004.96501/24/202978017DAA6 A Received02/20/2025 501,950.00A4.854 RIC6128 1,000,000.00 1,014,460.004.75002/15/2029 756109CF9 Aaa Received07/23/2025 1,014,460.00A4.307 SSC6092 500,000.00 493,045.004.14112/03/2029857477BD4 Aa Received05/23/2025 493,045.00A4.484 STESTR6085 500,000.00 500,095.004.53602/28/2028857477CU5 Aa Received03/20/2025 500,095.00A4.528 TOYOTA6067 1,500,000.00 1,479,570.000.80001/09/202689236THW8 A Received03/09/2021 1,479,570.00A1.090 TOYOTA6134 1,500,000.00 1,544,835.004.95001/09/203089236TNA9 A Received08/28/2025 1,544,835.00A4.192 UHGI6078 500,000.00 485,910.004.00005/15/202991324PEH1 A Received02/20/2025 485,910.00A4.741 USBANC6087 500,000.00 498,370.004.65302/01/202991159HJK7 Aaa Received04/22/2025 498,370.00A4.746 33,300,405.00Medium Term Notes Totals 33,300,405.000.003.41433,000,000.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
FHLB3576 3,000,000.00 2,995,657.091.25012/21/20263130AQF65 Aaa12/22/2021 2,995,657.09AA1.280 2,995,657.09Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Totals 2,995,657.090.001.2803,000,000.00 Treasury Securities - Coupon
UST2356 750,000.00 745,810.554.12511/15/202791282CLX7 Aa12/20/2024 745,810.55AA4.331 UST2357 750,000.00 747,421.884.12510/31/202691282CLS8 Aa12/20/2024 747,421.88AA3.433 UST2364 750,000.00 745,283.204.25001/15/202891282CMF5 Aaa01/15/2025 745,283.20AA4.476 UST2365 750,000.00 751,875.004.62509/30/202891282CJA0 Aa Received01/15/2025 751,875.00AA4.549 UST2366 750,000.00 735,000.003.62505/31/202891282CHE4 Aaa Received02/20/2025 735,000.00AA3.748 UST2367 750,000.00 751,699.224.37508/31/202891282CHX2 Aa Received02/20/2025 751,699.22AA4.305 UST2369 750,000.00 750,644.534.12502/28/202791282CMP3 Aa Received03/20/2025 750,644.53AA4.078 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.11
Par Value
Stated
Rate
September 30, 2025
Investment Status Report - Investments
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
CITY OF PLEASANTON
S&P
YTM
Moody'sCUSIP Investment # Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
Treasury Securities - Coupon
UST2370 750,000.00 746,279.303.87503/15/202891282CMS7 Aa Received03/20/2025 746,279.30AA4.053 UST2371 750,000.00 762,890.634.37511/30/202891282CJN2 Aa Received04/21/2025 762,890.63AA3.859 UST2372 1,000,000.00 998,515.633.75004/15/202891282CMW8 Aaa Received04/21/2025 998,515.63AA3.803 UST2373 750,000.00 750,966.803.87503/31/202791282CMV0 Aa Received04/21/2025 750,966.80AA3.805 UST2374 1,000,000.00 997,890.634.00001/31/202991282CJW2 Aa Received05/23/2025 997,890.63AA4.061 UST2375 1,000,000.00 995,273.443.75004/30/202791282CMY4 Aa Received05/23/2025 995,273.44AA4.005 UST2382 1,000,000.00 1,002,695.314.37507/31/202691282CLB5 Aa Received06/17/2025 1,002,695.31AA4.123 UST2383 1,250,000.00 1,261,132.814.12503/31/202991282CKG5 Aa Received06/05/2025 1,261,132.81AA3.871 UST2384 1,000,000.00 1,005,625.004.87504/30/202691282CKK6 Aa Received06/18/2025 1,005,625.00AA4.202 UST2385 1,500,000.00 1,499,003.913.87506/15/202891282CNH0 Aa Received06/18/2025 1,499,003.91AA3.899 UST2386 730,000.00 729,857.424.25001/31/202691282CJV4 Aa Received06/18/2025 729,857.42AA4.276 UST2387 1,000,000.00 1,014,765.634.62506/15/202791282CKV2 Aa Received06/05/2025 1,014,765.63AA3.860 UST2388 1,500,000.00 1,529,707.034.50005/31/202991282CKT7 Aa Received06/18/2025 1,529,707.03AA3.953 UST2389 450,000.00 447,328.133.62505/31/202891282CHE4 Aaa Received06/05/2025 447,328.13AA3.314 UST2390 500,000.00 506,269.534.37508/31/202891282CHX2 Aa Received06/17/2025 506,269.53AA4.395 UST2399 500,000.00 510,214.844.62509/30/202891282CJA0 Aa Received06/17/2025 510,214.84AA3.954 UST2401 3,000,000.00 3,019,453.134.62509/15/202691282CHY0 Aa Received07/22/2025 3,019,453.13AA4.038 UST2402 3,000,000.00 3,002,109.384.00001/15/202791282CJT9 Aa Received07/22/2025 3,002,109.38AA3.950 UST2403 2,000,000.00 2,010,937.504.00001/31/202991282CJW2 Aa Received07/22/2025 2,010,937.50AA3.832 UST2405 1,500,000.00 1,534,511.724.50005/31/202991282CKT7 Aa Received07/22/2025 1,534,511.72AA3.851 UST2406 3,000,000.00 3,010,312.504.25011/30/202691282CLY5 Aa Received07/22/2025 3,010,312.50AA3.984 UST2407 2,250,000.00 2,290,781.254.37511/30/202891282CJN2 Aa Received07/23/2025 2,290,781.25AA3.793 UST2408 1,750,000.00 1,768,525.394.12503/31/202991282CKG5 Aa Received07/23/2025 1,768,525.39AA3.813 UST2409 3,000,000.00 3,018,281.254.00007/31/202991282CLC3 Aa Received07/23/2025 3,018,281.25AA3.835 UST2410 3,000,000.00 3,032,226.564.12511/30/202991282CMA6 Aa Received07/23/2025 3,032,226.56AA3.854 UST2411 3,000,000.00 3,008,203.133.87507/15/202891282CNM9 Aa Received07/23/2025 3,008,203.13AA3.777 UST2412 750,000.00 771,855.474.62509/30/202891282CJA0 Aa Received08/29/2025 771,855.47AA3.618 UST2413 1,500,000.00 1,533,750.004.25001/31/203091282CMG3 Aa Received08/29/2025 1,533,750.00AA3.693 UST2414 3,000,000.00 2,971,875.003.50004/30/203091282CGZ8 Aaa Received09/30/2025 2,971,875.00AAA4.221 UST2415 3,000,000.00 2,978,671.883.37509/15/202891282CNY3 Aaa Received09/30/2025 2,978,671.88AAA3.640 53,937,644.58Treasury Securities - Coupon Totals 53,937,644.580.003.92553,680,000.00 Treasury Securities - Discount
UST2534 495,000.00 488,737.743.82701/27/2026912797SH1 P-109/30/2025 488,737.74A3.930 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.11
Par Value
Stated
Rate
September 30, 2025
Investment Status Report - Investments
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
CITY OF PLEASANTON
S&P
YTM
Moody'sCUSIP Investment # Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
488,737.74Treasury Securities - Discount Totals 488,737.740.003.930495,000.00 Federal Agency Issues - Callable
FFCB4575 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.001.05003/25/20263133EMUK6 Aaa03/25/2021 3,000,000.00AA1.050 FFCB4595 3,000,000.00 2,997,000.000.90006/15/20263133EMH21 Aaa Received06/24/2021 2,997,000.00AA0.921 FHLB4553 3,000,000.00 2,996,250.000.57011/25/20253130AKGD2 Aa11/25/2020 2,996,250.00AA0.595 FHLB4558 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.60002/12/20263130AKXQ4 Aaa02/12/2021 3,000,000.00AA0.110 FHLB4559 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.65002/26/20263130AKZ25 Aaa02/26/2021 3,000,000.00AA0.650 FHLB4560 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.62502/17/20263130AL3S1 Aaa02/17/2021 3,000,000.00AA0.625 FHLB4562 3,125,000.00 3,122,500.000.60002/24/20263130AKXJ0 Aa02/24/2021 3,122,500.00AA0.616 FHLB4563 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.75002/24/20263130ALCV4 02/24/2021 3,000,000.00AA0.750 FHLB4565 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.80003/16/20263130ALDN1 Aaa03/16/2021 3,000,000.00AA0.800 FHLB4578 3,000,000.00 2,998,050.000.98003/30/20263130ALNT7 Aaa03/30/2021 2,998,050.00AA0.993 FHLB4580 3,000,000.00 2,995,500.001.02004/15/20263130ALUC6 Aaa04/15/2021 2,995,500.00AA1.051 FHLB4585 2,795,000.00 2,795,000.001.02005/19/20263130AMCL4 Aaa Received05/20/2021 2,795,000.00AA1.020 FHLB4588 3,000,000.00 2,998,950.000.98005/26/20263130AMGW6 Aaa05/26/2021 2,998,950.00AA0.987 FHLB4590 2,750,000.00 2,746,562.500.87505/26/20263130AMHB1 Aaa Received06/02/2021 2,746,562.50AA0.901 FHLB4592 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.001.03006/30/20263130AMSL7 Aaa06/30/2021 3,000,000.00AA1.030 FHLB4594 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.001.07006/30/20263130AMYA4 Aaa06/30/2021 3,000,000.00AA1.070 FHLB4597 3,000,000.00 2,999,250.001.02007/14/20263130AMWK4 Aaa07/14/2021 2,999,250.00AA1.025 FHLB4598 3,000,000.00 2,983,500.000.92009/30/20263130AP2P9 Aaa09/30/2021 2,983,500.00AA1.033 FHLB4599 3,000,000.00 2,997,750.001.07010/14/20263130APC94 Aaa10/14/2021 2,997,750.00AA1.085 FHLB4600 530,000.00 526,947.201.30011/24/20263130APU78 Aaa Received12/09/2021 526,947.20AA1.421 FHLB4601 1,840,000.00 1,829,401.601.30011/24/20263130APUR4 Aaa Received12/09/2021 1,829,401.60AA1.421 FHLB4602 3,000,000.00 2,988,000.001.37512/01/20263130APVC6 Aaa Received12/09/2021 2,988,000.00AA1.459 FHLB4603 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.001.37012/30/20263130AQEC3 Aaa12/30/2021 3,000,000.00AA1.370 FHLB4604 3,000,000.00 2,998,500.001.37512/30/20263130AQEF6 Aaa12/30/2021 2,998,500.00AA1.385 FHLB4605 3,000,000.00 2,999,250.001.42012/29/20263130AQG80 Aaa Received01/03/2022 2,999,250.00AA1.425 FHLB4606 3,000,000.00 2,982,750.001.42012/29/20263130AQG80 Aaa Received01/10/2022 2,982,750.00AA1.541 FHLB4607 3,000,000.00 2,975,010.001.75001/28/20273130AQLD3 Aaa Received02/08/2022 2,975,010.00AA1.926 FHLB4608 3,000,000.00 2,995,500.002.08002/25/20273130AQW66 Aaa Received03/08/2022 2,995,500.00AA2.112 FHLMC4550 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.60010/28/20253134GW3F1 Aa10/28/2020 3,000,000.00AA0.600 FHLMC4554 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.62012/01/20253134GXDM3 Aa12/01/2020 3,000,000.00AA0.620 FNMA4556 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.55001/28/20263135G06R9 Aaa01/28/2021 3,000,000.00AA0.550 UST4610 3,000,000.00 2,995,664.063.75008/15/202791282CLG4 Aa Received07/23/2025 2,995,664.06AA3.823 91,921,335.36Federal Agency Issues - Callable Totals 91,921,335.360.001.11292,040,000.00 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.11
Par Value
Stated
Rate
September 30, 2025
Investment Status Report - Investments
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
CITY OF PLEASANTON
S&P
YTM
Moody'sCUSIP Investment # Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
Supranationals
IBFRAD7005 2,000,000.00 1,972,780.003.50007/12/2028459058KT9 Aaa Received06/18/2025 1,972,780.00AAA3.975 IFC7000 1,000,000.00 980,200.000.50002/26/202645950VPS9 Aaa Received06/28/2021 980,200.00AAA0.935 IFC7011 1,000,000.00 1,007,230.004.37501/15/202745950KDF4 Aaa Received06/30/2025 1,007,230.00AAA3.886 3,960,210.00Supranationals Totals 3,960,210.000.003.2004,000,000.00 Asset Backed Securities
BMW7007 175,000.00 174,996.154.43006/26/2028096912AD2 06/10/2025 174,996.15AAA4.473 HYU7006 265,000.00 264,976.074.36012/17/202944935XAD7 06/11/2025 264,976.07AAA4.404 TOYLOT7013 805,000.00 804,855.913.96011/20/202889240NAD4 09/17/2025 804,855.91AAA3.872 1,244,828.13Asset Backed Securities Totals 1,244,828.130.004.0701,245,000.00 Compounding CD's
VCBSYS 1091-3 254,392.57 254,392.574.15004/11/2026SYS 1091-3 04/11/2025 254,392.574.150 254,392.57Compounding CD's Totals 254,392.570.004.150254,392.57 229,395,806.14Investment Totals 229,395,806.140.00229,006,988.24 2.770 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.11
Par Value
Stated
Rate
September 30, 2025
Investment Status Report - Cash
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
CITY OF PLEASANTON
S&P
YTM
Moody'sCUSIP Investment # Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
Gov't Money Market
BNYT7-3 0.00 0.00SYS CASH 07/01/2025 0.000.000
0.00Cash Totals
Total Cash and Investments 229,395,806.14
0.00 229,395,806.14
0.00 0.00
0.00 229,006,988.24 2.770
Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.11
Stated
Rate
Transaction
Date
September 1, 2025 through September 30, 2025
Activity By Type
Balance
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Purchases
or Deposits
Redemptions
or Withdrawals
Certificates of Deposit - Bank
237,927.71Subtotal
LAIF (Monthly Summary)
36,500,000.00Subtotal
Gov't Money Market (Monthly Summary)
Dryfus Govt Cash Mgmt 6727-1 56,100.284.110 0.00X9USDCRGO Dryfus Govt Cash Mgmt 6727-2 4,288,917.504.110 4,146,384.61X9USDCRGO 4,146,384.61 4,554,667.96Subtotal 4,345,017.78
Medium Term Notes
33,300,405.00Subtotal
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
2,995,657.09Subtotal
Treasury Securities - Coupon
U S TREASURY2386 0.004.250 09/11/2025 269,947.2791282CJV4 U S TREASURY2414 2,971,875.003.500 09/30/2025 0.0091282CGZ8 U S TREASURY2415 2,978,671.883.375 09/30/2025 0.0091282CNY3 269,947.27 53,937,644.58Subtotal 5,950,546.88
Treasury Securities - Discount
U S TREASURY2533 0.004.229 09/11/2025 488,254.90912797RP4 U S TREASURY2534 488,737.743.827 09/30/2025 0.00912797SH1 488,254.90 488,737.74Subtotal 488,737.74
Federal Agency Issues - Callable
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK4548 0.000.530 09/29/2025 3,336,660.003133EMBJ0 FREDDIE MAC4549 0.000.550 09/30/2025 2,997,600.003134GWWT9 6,334,260.00 91,921,335.36Subtotal 0.00
Supranationals
3,960,210.00Subtotal
Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM3) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
Stated
Rate
Transaction
Date
September 1, 2025 through September 30, 2025
Activity By Type
Balance
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Purchases
or Deposits
Redemptions
or Withdrawals
Asset Backed Securities
Toyota Lease Owner Trust7013 804,855.913.960 09/17/2025 0.0089240NAD4
0.00 1,244,828.13Subtotal 804,855.91
Compounding CD's
United Business BankSYS 1091-3 895.024.150 0.00SYS 1091-3
0.00 254,392.57Subtotal 895.02
229,395,806.14Total 11,238,846.7811,590,053.33
Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM3) 7.3.11
September 2024 through September 2025
Activity Summary
Month
Portfolio Management
End Year
Number of
Securities
Average
Balance
360
Equivalent
365
Equivalent
Managed
Pool
Rate
Average
Term
Average
Days to Maturity
CITY OF PLEASANTON
Number
of Investments
Purchased
Number
of Investments
Redeemed
Yield to Maturity
229,828,688.26September 2024 73 1,490 4281.599 1.621 4.480 1 2 220,883,480.07October 2024 71 1,541 4201.495 1.516 4.480 0 1 217,493,941.37November 2024 70 1,540 3941.493 1.514 4.480 0 0 225,183,251.16December 2024 76 1,405 3451.775 1.799 4.480 6 1 241,044,442.47January 2025 80 1,384 3341.844 1.870 4.480 5 2 242,039,662.99February 2025 83 1,385 3291.868 1.894 4.480 5 1 242,036,422.49March 2025 90 1,349 3251.942 1.969 4.480 8 4 255,472,697.89April 2025 95 1,243 2962.172 2.202 4.480 9 1 267,798,757.09May 2025 98 1,235 2872.211 2.242 4.480 4 1 261,524,567.29June 2025 112 1,222 3182.327 2.360 4.480 15 5 256,550,729.23July 2025 136 1,128 4422.781 2.820 4.480 29 15 235,977,919.77August 2025 125 1,247 4822.639 2.676 4.480 4 4 229,188,857.97September 2025 127 1,235 4972.732 2.770 4.480 4 4 Average 240,395,185.36 2.068% 2.096% 4.480 7 3 1,339 37795 Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM4) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
September 2024 through September 2025
Distribution of Investments By Type
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
AverageOctoberSeptember November
2024 2024 by Period
JanuaryDecember February
2024 2025
AprilMarch May
2025 2025
June August
2025 2025
September
2025Security Type
July
2025202520252024
0.2 0.20.2Certificates of Deposit - Bank 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.20.2 0.1 0.2% Certificates of Deposit - S & L
13.8 13.717.3LAIF 22.0 22.022.0 27.6 27.622.0 23.3 15.925.7 15.9 20.7% Fidelity - Government Fund
1.4 1.50.7Gov't Money Market 1.1 0.80.4 2.0 2.02.2 1.8 1.92.1 2.0 1.5% Managed Pool Accounts -4
Passbook/Checking Accounts
9.9 9.910.2Medium Term Notes 9.5 9.39.4 7.6 7.97.3 13.3 14.58.4 14.5 10.1% Bankers Acceptances
Commercial Paper - Discount
1.4 1.41.3Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 1.2 1.21.2 1.1 1.11.2 1.2 1.31.2 1.3 1.3% Federal Agency Issues - Discount
Treasury Securities - Coupon 1.2 1.90.6 3.2 3.92.5 18.3 21.17.8 23.5 6.5% Treasury Securities - Discount 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.1%
72.9 72.869.8Federal Agency Issues - Callable 64.3 64.265.8 58.1 56.964.2 39.2 42.953.2 40.1 58.8%
0.5 0.50.4Supranationals 0.4 0.40.4 0.4 0.40.4 1.6 1.71.1 1.7 0.8% Miscellaneous Securities - Discount
Asset Backed Securities 0.2 0.20.2 0.5 0.1%
Compounding CD's 0.1
Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM5) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
September 30, 2025
Interest Earnings Summary
Month EndingSeptember 30 Fiscal Year To Date
Portfolio Management
CITY OF PLEASANTON
CD/Coupon/Discount Investments:
374,764.23Interest Collected
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period
1,062,607.87
( 1,025,320.95)
1,229,281.99
1,062,607.87
( 828,729.03)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 47,850.33) ( 452,622.51) Interest Earned during Period
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Earnings during Periods
364,200.82
6,328.87
1,010,538.32
-748,862.90
370,529.69 261,675.42
Pass Through Securities:
1,608.87Interest Collected
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period
1,175.55
( 630.52)
5,278.01
1,175.55
( 1,094.12)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Earnings during Periods
2,153.90
0.00 0.00
5,359.44
0.00 0.00
2,153.90 5,359.44
Cash/Checking Accounts:
16,354.92Interest Collected
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period
502,121.39
( 367,206.17)
817,838.90
502,121.39
( 721,140.82)
Interest Earned during Period 151,270.14 598,819.47
Total Interest Earned during Period
Total Capital Gains or Losses
Total Earnings during Period
517,624.86
6,328.87
1,614,717.23
-748,862.90
523,953.73 865,854.33
Portfolio PLST
CC
Run Date: 10/22/2025 - 11:04 PM (PRF_PM6) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
CITY OF PLEASANTON
PARS Post-Employment Benefits Trust 9/1/2025 to 9/30/2025
Susan Hsieh
Director of Finance
City of Pleasanton
123 Main Street
Pleasanton, CA 94566
Account Summary
Source 9/1/2025 Contributions Earnings Expenses Distributions Transfers 9/30/2025 PENSION - Short Term 1075 $21,144,107.96 $0.00 $162,956.25 $5,864.87 $0.00 $0.00 $21,301,199.34 PENSION - Long Term 1076 $36,579,472.61 $0.00 $970,256.46 $10,257.72 $0.00 $0.00 $37,539,471.35 Totals $57,723,580.57 $0.00 $1,133,212.71 $16,122.59 $0.00 $0.00 $58,840,670.69 Investment Selection
Source
PENSION - Short Term
PENSION - Long Term
Investment Objective
Source
PENSION - Short Term
PENSION - Long Term
Investment Return
Source 1-Month 3-Months 1-Year 3-Years 5-Years 10-Years PENSION - Short Term 0.77% 2.16% 5.97% 7.50% 4.15% - 6/21/2018 PENSION - Long Term 2.65% 5.93% 11.63% 16.11% 9.72% - 6/21/2018 Information as provided by US Bank, Trustee for PARS; Not FDIC Insured; No Bank Guarantee; May Lose Value Headquarters - 4350 Von Karman Ave., Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA 92660 800.540.6369 Fax 949.250.1250 www.pars.org Account balances are inclusive of Trust Administration, Trustee and Investment Management fees Annualized Return
Investment Return: Annualized rate of return is the return on an investment over a period other than one year multiplied or divided to give a comparable one-year return.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Performance returns may not reflect the deduction of applicable fees, which could reduce returns. Information is deemed reliable but may be subject to change.
Individual Custom Account
Account Report for the Period
Balance as of
City of Pleasanton
Balance as of
Individual Custom Account
City of Pleasanton - Capital Growth
Plan's Inception Date
Item #9
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
November 4, 2025
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - HEAR AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S
DETERMINATION AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION UPHOLDING THE APPROVAL
OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW TO INSTALL SIX, APPROXIMATELY 15-FOOT-TALL, TENNIS COURT LIGHTS IN THE REAR YARD LOCATED AT 2207 MARTIN AVENUE, FILED UNDER CASE NO. P25- 0236
SUMMARY
On July 18, 2025, the Zoning Administrator (ZA) held a public hearing and approved an Administrative Design Review (ADR) application to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights in the rear yard of a property located at 2207 Martin Avenue, filed under Case No.
P25-0236. On August 4, 2025, the adjacent neighbors/appellants located at 3520 Dennis Drive filed an appeal of the ZA’s approval to the Planning Commission. On September 10, 2025, the Planning Commission upheld the ZA’s approval, based on the required findings and subject to the draft Conditions of Approval listed in Attachment 2, Exhibit A.
On September 25, 2025, the adjacent neighbors/appellants filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s determination to the City Council (Attachment 3).
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution upholding the Planning Commission’s determination upholding the Zoning Administrator’s determination to approve an application for Administrative Design Review to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights in the rear yard of a property located at 2207 Martin Avenue, filed under Case No. P25-0236, based on the required findings and subject to the draft Conditions of Approval listed in Attachment 1.
BACKGROUND
On February 6, 2024, the City Council approved Planned Unit Development (PUD)-148, which established R-1-40,000 District development standards for the subject property and allowed the installation of fencing around an existing tennis court. PUD-148 does not prohibit lighting of the tennis court; however, a condition of approval for the PUD requires Administrative Design Review (ADR) approval for any tennis court lighting exceeding eight feet in height.
As required by PUD-148, the applicant submitted an ADR application to install the proposed tennis court lights. The initial application was denied by the Planning Commission on May 22, 2025, due to insufficient information on potential lighting impacts. The Commission clarified in making its decision that the denial was based on insufficient technical analysis, not that lighting should be prohibited altogether.
A revised ADR application (P25-0236), including a detailed lighting and photometric study (see Attachment 2, Exhibit B), was submitted on June 2, 2025. Following a public hearing on July
18, 2025, the Zoning Administrator approved the request subject to conditions of approval provided in Attachment 2. That determination was appealed to the Planning Commission on August 4, 2025. (Attachment 2, Exhibit C).
On September 10, 2025, after considering all public comments and the criteria for design review approval per Pleasanton Municipal Code Section (PMC) 18.20.030, the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Administrator’s (ZA’s) approval of the ADR application.
Attachment 2, which includes the Planning Commission Agenda Report for the September 10 appeal hearing, provides additional detail regarding the related approvals for the proposed project.
DISCUSSION
Basis for Appeal
The adjacent property owners/appellants filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s determination on September 25, 2025 (Attachment 3). The basis of the appeal includes:
• Classification of the proposed tennis court lights and fencing as a Class 1 accessory structure, as defined in the PMC, which requires a 20-foot setback • The overall tennis court project history
• Appellants being unable to attend the September 10, 2025, Planning Commission appeal hearing date.
Staff Analysis
As described above, the proposed tennis court and associated tennis court fencing were approved as part of the development plan under PUD-148, which included the proposed tennis court setbacks of approximately six feet from the northern side property line (closest to the adjacent property owners/appellants). The PMC does not address sports courts or any associated fencing and lighting. There are numerous properties throughout the City that have sports courts, both with and without lighting. The PUD process allows for the incorporation of specific development regulations into the development plan, including tailored setback and other requirements. As such, the applicant pursued and obtained approval for a development plan that permitted the tennis court and fencing in its current location.
During the public hearing for approval of PUD-148, the Planning Commission considered requests to prohibit tennis court lighting under PUD-148, but instead recommended a project- specific condition requiring an ADR for any tennis court lighting installed above eight feet in height.
As outlined above, the applicant is pursuing approval to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights. The project proposes tennis court lighting that is consistent with, or below, industry standards for provision of adequate lighting for recreational tennis courts. A photometric study (Attachment 2, Exhibit B) analyzed six, approximately 15-foot-tall, anti-glare light poles with 18-inch extension arms—three of which on the north side of the tennis court include shielding. The photometric study provided nighttime and footcandle renderings showing illumination focused downward with no spillover beyond the property boundaries. The study concludes that, with mitigation measures and existing mature vegetation ranging from six to nine feet in height, the lighting would not cause measurable spillover to adjacent properties
or Dennis Drive.
Conditions of approval for the tennis court lighting further specify that the lights are prohibited from being on between 10 p.m. and 7.a.m. daily, with an automatic timer required to ensure adherence to this requirement. And, as detailed on Page 4 of 6 of the Planning Commission Agenda Report (Attachment 2), the applicant was also required to install screening vegetation, which has matured to a height of 6-9 feet since it was planted.
Regarding the appellants’ ability to attend the prior appeal hearing, the PMC prescribes timelines for scheduling hearings for appeals (PMC 18.144.030), requiring such hearings to be scheduled within 40 days of the appeal being filed (August 4, 2025). While staff made its best effort to schedule the hearing at a time both the appellant and applicant were available, the hearing was ultimately scheduled on September 10, 2025, to meet the PMC timelines and staff’s reasonable ability to prepare the Agenda Report and provide the required public hearing notice during the 40-day period.
Design Review Considerations and Conclusion
PMC Section 18.20.030 sets forth the scope of review criteria to be addressed in reviewing projects subject to design review. These criteria are included in the draft Resolution (Exhibit A).
As described, the Planning Commission denied the prior appeal and upheld the Zoning Administrator’s approval, based on the consideration of the proposed tennis court lighting conformance to the PUD approval, and design measures, supported by appropriate technical analysis, all of which indicate that the project would minimize potential off-site impacts to neighboring residences.
As described in Exhibit A and based on the information and analysis provided in this Agenda Report, staff recommends the City Council make the required findings to affirm the Planning Commission's approval of ADR Case No. P25-0236
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Not applicable, as this item is a routine matter of City Business.
OUTREACH
Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a 1,000- foot radius of the site and published in the newspaper. The noticing map is included in Attachment 4. At the time this report was published, staff has not received any public comments. However, neighbors who received notice of the September 10, 2025, Planning Commission public hearing expressed concerns regarding the proximity of the tennis court lights to nearby residences, potential lighting and traffic impacts, the height of the light poles, aesthetic considerations, tennis court setbacks, and consistency with the Planning Commission’s prior denial (Attachment 2, Exhibit D). Any additional public comments received after publication of this report will be forwarded to the City Council.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Not applicable, as this item is a routine matter of City Business.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable, as this item is a routine matter of City Business.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Diego Mora, Associate
Planner
Ellen Clark, Director of Community and
Economic Development
Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:
1. Resolution and Conditions of Approval
2. September 10, 2025, Planning Commission Agenda Report with Exhibits
3. Appeal Letter Received September 25, 2025
4. Project Location and Notification Map
5. Presentation
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION TO UPHOLD THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW (ADR) APPROVAL TO INSTALL SIX 15-FOOT-TALL TENNIS COURT LIGHTS IN THE REAR YARD OF A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2207 MARTIN AVENUE, AS FILED UNDER CASE NO. P25- 0236
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2024, the City Council approved Planned Unit Development (PUD)-148 for 2207 Martin Avenue, which established development standards for the property, inclusive of allowing for installation of fencing around an existing tennis court, with a Condition of Approval requiring Administrative Design Review approval for any tennis court lighting exceeding eight feet in height; and
WHEREAS, On June 2, 2025, Meenu Gochhwal and Ashish Choudhary (“Applicant”) applied for ADR approval under case No. P25-0236 to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights in the rear yard located at 2207 Martin Avenue (hereinafter “the Project”); and
WHEREAS, the subject property is designated Low Density Residential in the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, zoning for the subject property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development – Low Density Residential) District; and
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2025, the Zoning Administrator approved the application for Administrative Design Review (Case No. P25-0236); and
WHEREAS, on August 4, 2025, Ray & Michele Peterson (“Appellants”) filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s decision to the Pleasanton Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2025, with a 5-0 vote, the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Administrator’s approval for Administrative Design Review application (Case No. P25- 0236); and
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2025, the Appellants filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to the Pleasanton City Council; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the Pleasanton City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on this application and considered all public testimony, agenda reports, and related materials, and the recommendation of City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING:
SECTION 1. The Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The addition of six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights is considered construction of new small facilities or accessory structures and is consistent with the applicable site development standards. The Project does not involve the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances, all necessary public services and facilities are available, and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. Therefore, no additional environmental review is required.
Attachment 1
Resolution No.
SECTION 2. Prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public meeting, the City Council reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.
SECTION 3. The Project is consistent with the adopted General Plan as it aligns with the applicable land use designations and supports the General Plan’s Programs, Policies, and Goals related to retaining the character of existing neighborhoods and minimizing intrusions. The Project is also consistent with the R-1-40,000 District development standards, as modified by the specific development standards for the tennis court set forth in PUD-148.
SECTION 4 Criteria for Design Review Approval With respect to the Administrative Design Review application, the City Council finds the Project was reviewed and approved based on the nine criteria as required by Section 18.20.030 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code, which include the following:
1. Preservation of the natural beauty of the city and the project site's relationship to it;
2. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building to its site, including transition with streetscape, public views of the buildings, and scale of buildings within its site and adjoining buildings;
3. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building and its site to adjoining areas, including compatibility of architectural styles, harmony in adjoining buildings, attractive landscape transitions, and consistency with neighborhood character;
4. Preservation of views enjoyed by residents, workers within the city, and passersby through the community;
5. Landscaping designed to enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas, provide shade, and conform to established streetscape;
6. Relationship of exterior lighting to its surroundings and to the building and adjoining landscape;
7. Architectural style, as a function of its quality of design and relationship to its surroundings; the relationship of building components to one another/the building's colors and materials; and the design attention given to mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings;
8. Integration of signs as part of the architectural concept; and
9. Architectural concept of miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art in relationship to the site and landscape.
With respect to the above criteria, the City Council finds the Project, as conditioned, would preserve and enhance the City’s aesthetic values and ensure the preservation of the public health, safety and general welfare. The Project is consistent with the allowable height, setbacks and other pertinent development standards of the PUD-LDR and subject to the R-1-40,000 District development standards in which it is located. The lighting is designed to harmonize and integrate
Resolution No.
with its surroundings by providing adequate illumination for the tennis court, while minimizing glare and spillover onto adjacent properties. The shielded, downward-directed tennis court lighting is appropriately sized and located in conformance with the existing property standards
SECTION 5. The City Council hereby upholds the Planning Commission’s decision upholding the Zoning Administrator’s decision approving Case No. P25-0236, an Administrative Design Review application to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights in the rear yard at 2207 Martin Avenue, subject to the Conditions of Approval shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 5. City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on November 4, 2025.
I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of November, 2025, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
Resolution No.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
P25-0236
2207 Martin Avenue
November 4, 2025
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this approval, that (s)he is required to satisfy and maintain compliance with the conditions of approval below. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, Planning Division, Director of Engineering/City Engineer, City Attorney, Chief Building and Safety Official, Fire Department or other City staff is required, review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations, and accepted practices related to the approval. In addition to complying with the conditions below, the applicant is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws that pertain to this project whether or not specifically noted herein.
This approval is granted for an Administrative Design Review approval to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights, in the rear yard on Assessor Parcel No. 946-1146-46, located at 2207 Martin Avenue. Development shall be substantially as shown on the project materials listed below:
a. Project plans, Exhibit B, prepared by Meenu Gochhwal and Ashish Choudhary, owners, dated “Received” on June 2, 2025, and kept on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department.
The project materials listed above are collectively the “Approved Plans.”
THIS APPROVAL IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. APPROVAL AND REVISIONS: proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the “Approved Plans”, except as modified by the following conditions.
Minor changes to the plans may be allowed subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development if found to be in substantial conformance with the approved exhibits. Planning Division approval is required before any changes are implemented in site design, grading, architectural design, building colors or materials, green building measures, landscape material, etc.
2. EXPIRATION: Administrative Design Review approval shall lapse and become void one year following the effective date of project approval, unless prior to the expiration of one year, a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion or an extension has been approved by the City.
3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CHECKLIST: The applicant shall submit a “Conditions of Approval Checklist” indicating all conditions in Exhibit A have been satisfied, incorporated into the building permit plans or improvements plans, and/or addressed. Said checklist shall be incorporated as one of the first four plan sheets of all building permit and engineering permit plan submittals for review by the City prior to issuance of permits.
4. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION: To the extent permitted by law, the project applicant shall hold harmless, defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), and indemnify the City, Exhibit A
Attachment 1
Resolution No.
its City Council, its officers, commissions, employee and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and/or the applicant to attack, set aside, or void the approval of the project or any permit authorized hereby for the project, including without limitation, reimbursing the City its attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice.
PLANNING DIVISION – 925-931-5600
Tennis Court Lighting
5. All appropriate City permits shall be obtained prior to construction of the tennis court lighting.
6. All six tennis court lights shall be down-directed so as to minimize any off-site light and glare, and be no taller than 15-feet measured vertically from the average elevation of the natural grade or finished grade, whichever is lower. Project specific condition.
7. The three tennis court lights on the north side of the tennis court shall be shielded to minimize any off-site lighting spillover. Project specific condition.
8. Light trespass across property lines onto adjacent residential property shall be limited to
0.1 foot-candle. Project specific condition.
9. Hours of Illumination. No person or persons shall turn on, or allow to be left on, tennis court lights between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. daily. Project specific condition.
10. Tennis court lights shall be on a timer which allows for a maximum duration of lighting that does not exceed two hours before shutting off lights to help ensure that lights are not inadvertently left on beyond the times specified above. Project specific condition.
11. Final inspection by the Planning Division is required prior to use of tennis court lighting.
Project specific condition.
12. All demolition and construction activities, inspections, plan checking, material delivery, staff assignment, or coordination, etc., shall be limited to the hours of 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be allowed on State or Federal Holidays or Sundays. The Director of Community Development may allow earlier “start-times” or later “stop-times” for specific construction activities (e.g., concrete pouring), if it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that the construction noise and construction traffic noise will not affect nearby residents or businesses. All construction equipment must meet Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) noise standards and shall be equipped with muffling devices. Prior to construction, the applicant shall post on the site the allowable hours of construction activity.
END
Planning Commission
Agenda Report
September 10, 2025
Item 5
SUBJECT: P25-0236
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY OWNERS: Meenu Gochhwal & Ashish Choudhary
APPELLANT: Ray & Michele Peterson
PURPOSE: Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of an Administrative Design Review application to install six approximately 15-foot-tall tennis court lights in the rear yard of an existing property located at 2207 Martin Avenue.
LOCATION: 2207 Martin Avenue
GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential
ZONING: PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development – Low Density Residential) EXHIBITS: A. Draft Resolution and Conditions of Approval B. Project Plans dated “Received June 2, 2025”
C. Appeal Letter dated “Received August 4, 2025”
D. Public Comments
E Location and Notification Map
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution upholding the Zoning Administrator’s approval of an Administrative Design Review application, Case No. P25-0236, based on the required findings and subject to the draft Conditions of Approval listed in Attachment 1 to Exhibit A.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On July 18, 2025, the Zoning Administrator (ZA) conducted a public hearing and approved an Administrative Design Review (ADR) application to install six approximately 15-foot-tall tennis court lights in the rear yard of an existing property located at 2207 Martin Avenue. On August 4, 2025, the neighbors/appellants located at 3520 Dennis Drive filed an appeal of the ZA’s action to the Planning Commission.
Per PUD-148 (the development plan approved by the City Council on February 6, 2024), sports
court lighting exceeding 8 feet in height requires ADR approval. As conditioned, staff recommends the Planning Commission find the proposal consistent with the design review standards as outlined in Plea santon Municipal Code (PMC) Section 18.20.030, affirming the ZA’s approval.
Attachment 2
P25-0236, 2207 Martin Avenue. Planning Commission
2 of 6
BACKGROUND
On August 23, 2023, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed PUD-148 application for 2207 Martin Avenue and recommended approval to the City Council. The request was to apply R-1-40,000 District development standards to the property, with additional standards specific to a partially built tennis court located in the rear yard. During the public hearing, the applicant stated that while they had no immediate plans to install lighting, they did not want future lighting to be prohibited. Additional background related to the development history of the tennis court is provided in the August 23, 2023, agenda report. On December 13, 2023, the Planning Commission reaffirmed and recommended approval of PUD-148 to the City Council.
The PUD-1 48 application was introduced to the City Council on January 16, 2024, and adopted on February 6, 2024. The approval established R-1-40,000 District development standards for the property, along with specific development standards for the tennis court.
While tennis court lighting was not explicitly prohibited, the PUD requires ADR approval for any lighting installed above 8 feet in height.
On May 22, 2024, the ZA referred an ADR application to install six approximately 15-foot-tall tennis court lights to the Planning Commission for review and consideration. With respect to the lighting, neighbors expressed concerns regarding impacts on homes, the height of the light poles, and potential traffic hazards. The Planning Commission determined the lighting impact analysis lacked sufficient detail, making it difficult to assess potential lighting impacts on the neighboring properties. After reviewing all testimony and project materials, the Planning Commission denied the application. However, the Commission clarified the denial did not mean lighting could never be installed; rather, the specific proposal submitted was not supported by an adequate lighting study/analysis.
On June 2, 2025, staff received a second ADR application to install six approximately 15-foot- tall tennis court lights in the rear yard (“the Project”). In response to the Planning Commission’s comments from May 22, 2024, the applicant provided an updated and more detailed lighting/photometric study prepared by cBright Lighting, manufacturer lighting specifications, and an evaluation of the existing and proposed off-site lighting impacts (Exhibit B) .
On June 17, 2025, staff sent neighbor notices as part of the ADR process and received a request for a ZA hearing by the property owners at 3520 Dennis Drive. The ZA held a public hearing on July 18, 2025. During the notice period and at the hearing, neighbors expressed concerns regarding light pollution, visual
blight, setting a precedent for future development, the proximity of lights to the adjacent residence to the north, disregard for zoning regulations, and the project’s history of unpermitted work relating to the tennis court. After considering all public comments, the ZA approved the ADR application, subject to the conditions outlined in Attachment 1 to Exhibit A.
The ZA’s action was appealed to the Planning Commission on August 4, 2025 (Exhibit C).
SITE AND AREA DESCRIPTION
The subject property is a flat, approximately 1.67-acre site located between Martin Avenue and Dennis Drive. It is developed with an approximately 4,173-square-foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached garage. The property includes several mature trees clustered near the center and is also thoroughly landscaped throughout. Surrounding the property to the north, south, and west are other single-family homes—consisting of one- and two-stories—
P25-0236, 2207 Martin Avenue. Planning Commission 3 of 6
while to the east, across Martin Avenue, lies land owned by the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Aerial View of Vicinity
PROPOSED PROJECT
The applicant proposes to install six tennis court lights, each approximately 15 feet tall, around an existing rear yard tennis court (Exhibit B). The lights would be placed directly adjacent to the existing tennis court, with a side setback of approximately 6 feet from the northern property line (adjacent residence) and a rear setback of approximately 33 feet. Each light fixture would be downward-facing, equipped with anti-glare and an approximately 18-inch extension arm.
The light fixture models are proposed: three light fixtures along the northern property line, each producing approximately 31,956 lumens, and three others producing approximately 37,424 lumens, for a combined total of approximately 208,138 lumens. The three light fixtures closest to the adjacent residence on the north side would also include shielding. Further, the project proposes automated light timers.
ANALYSIS
Consistency with General Plan and Zoning Land Uses:
General Plan
Although General Plan policies and programs do not explicitly address sports courts or lighting, at least three policies and programs address the need to retain the character of existing neighborhoods and minimize intrusions. As conditioned, staff finds the Project would meet the intent of the General Plan.
P25-0236, 2207 Martin Avenue. Planning Commission 4 of 6
Zoning
The subject property is zoned PUD-LDR and is subject to the R-1-40,000 District development standards, as well as more site-specific development standards incorporated into the Conditions of Approval adopted as part of PUD-148.
Tennis Court Development Standards
The PMC does not address sports courts and associated lighting. However, the approval for PUD-148 includes specific tennis court development standards, which include the following:
a. Allow fencing at a maximum height of 10 feet in height at the front and rear (narrow) ends of the tennis court.
b. Allow fencing at a maximum height of 8 feet on the long sides of the tennis court, extending from the 10-foot-high corner poles to the service lines. c. Vining vegetation shall be planted to grow along the tennis court fencing, and tall, 5-gallon minimum vegetation shall be placed between the tennis court and northern property line fencing.
d. The Applicant and neighbor (appellant) shall share repair costs of an approximately 7-foot-high solid wood fence along the northern property line between 2207 Martin Avenue and 3520 Dennis Drive. If the applicant and neighbor have not shared costs to pay for the repairs within six months of the effective date of this approval, the applicant shall be relieved of this condition.
e. Tennis court lighting above 8 feet in height shall require Administrative Design Review.
Since the approval of PUD-148, the applicant has added vegetation on the northern property/fence line and increased the height of the existing wood fence at the rear (along Dennis Drive) from approximately 6 feet to 7 feet pursuant to an approved over-height-fence permit (Case No. P24-0196). The applicant has also completed construction of the step-down style tennis court fencing with vegetation as required by item c above (Exhibit B). Furthermore, the applicant is no longer subject to item d above due to the lapse of time.
The applicant proposes tennis court lighting consistent with, or below, industry standards for recreational tennis courts (see May 22, 2024, agenda report for industry standard analysis).
Exhibit B includes a photometric study evaluating six anti-glare, approximately 15-foot-tall light poles with approximately 18-inch extension arms, three of which–on the north side–are equipped with shields. The lighting/photometric study also provides nighttime and footcandle color renderings illustrating the lighting impacts. Both renderings show the light focused downward toward the court with no spillover beyond the property boundaries.
According to the lighting/photometric study (Exhibit B), the proposed lighting, with the included mitigation measures, would result in zero light spillover to the adjacent north property or to Dennis Drive across the rear property line. In addition, existing vegetation provides further light mitigation. As part of the original tennis court and fencing approvals under PUD-148, a mix of plantings was installed and has since matured to a height of approximately 6 to 9 feet (Exhibit B).
The application also provides existing lighting conditions adjacent to/near the project site, including streetlights on Dennis Drive and garage lights from the adjacent property to the north at 3520 Dennis Drive. Staff believes the proposed tennis court lighting would not significantly increase the overall lighting in the surrounding area. As part of the ADR approval, the lights are
P25-0236, 2207 Martin Avenue. Planning Commission 5 of 6
limited to operating between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. daily. Additionally, a condition requires installation of an automatic timer to ensure the lights are not left on outside of these hours.
Appeal
The appellants filed an appeal of the ZA’s determination on August 4, 2025 (Exhibit C). The bases of the appeal include:
• An alleged staff conflict of interest
• A claim that the ZA’s reasoning for approval is not consistent with the Planning Commission’s determination on May 22, 2024
• The overall tennis court project history.
In approving the application, the ZA considered all public comments, relevant development standards, and the Planning Commission’s previous comments and determinations made at the public hearings held on August 23, 2023, and December 13, 2023. When recommending approval of PUD-148 and in their comments denying the first ADR application for tennis court lighting, the Planning Commission accounted for the potential of tennis court lighting, approved the tennis court location with an approximately 6-foot northern side setback, and established specific tennis court regulations, without prohibiting sports court lighting. Under PUD-148, tennis court lighting above 8 feet in height requires ADR approval. As such, the ZA focused on the design and lighting impacts of the proposal–not whether lighting would otherwise be allowed or subject to the R-1-40,000 District accessory structure setback of 20 feet. The ZA concluded that the project complies with PMC Section 18.20.030 design review criteria and the lot’s applicable development standards set forth in PUD-148, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS
The PMC Section 18.20.030 sets forth the scope of review criteria to be addressed in reviewing projects subject to design review. These criteria are set forth in the draft Resolution included as Exhibit A. As described in Exhibit A and based on the information and analysis provided in this Agenda Report, staff recommends the Planning Commission make the required findings to affirm the Zoning Administrator’s approval for ADR Case No. P25-0236.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a 1,000- foot radius of the site (Exhibit E). At the time this report was published, staff received several comments expressing concern about the proposed tennis court lights. Noticed neighbors expressed concerns about the proximity of the tennis court lights to nearby residences, potential lighting and traffic impacts, the height of the light poles, aesthetic considerations, tennis court setbacks, and consistency with the Planning Commission’s prior denial. Please see Exhibit D for full public comment details. Any additional public comments received after publication of this report will be forwarded to the Planning Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures.
Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this report.
P25-0236, 2207 Martin Avenue. Planning Commission 6 of 6
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
As proposed and conditioned, staff finds the proposed tennis court lighting would not adversely impact the surrounding uses. Conditions of Approval have been included as part of Project approval, which will ensure the safety and general welfare of the surrounding area and the City. Staff has reviewed the application and proposed plans and finds the tennis court lighting is consistent with general industry standards for residential tennis court lighting. Accordingly, staff recommends that the Planning Commission affirm the decision of the Zoning Administrator approving the ADR application, Case No. P25-0236, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
Primary Author: Diego Mora, AICP, Associate Planner, [email protected]
Reviewed/Approved By:
Kimberly Cilley, Assistant City Attorney
Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager/Deputy Director
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2025-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
PLEASANTON AFFIRMING THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S DECISION TO
APPROVE AN APPLICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW (ADR) TO INSTALL SIX, APPROXIMATELY 15-FOOT-TALL, TENNIS COURT LIGHTS IN THE REAR YARD LOCATED AT 2207 MARTIN AVENUE, SUBJECT TO THE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE NO. P25-0236
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2025, Meenu Gochhwal and Ashish Choudhary (“Applicant”) applied for ADR approval under case No. P25-0236 to install six approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights in the rear yard located at 2207 Martin Avenue (hereinafter “the Project”); and
WHEREAS, the subject property is designated Low Density Residential in the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the zoning for the subject property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development – Low Density Residential) District; and
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, all public comments and testimony, and findings.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, does resolve, declare, determine, and order the following:
Section 1: Prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The Planning Commission’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.
Section 2: The Project is consistent with the adopted General Plan as it aligns with the applicable land use designations and supports the General Plan’s Programs, Policies, and Goals related to retaining the character of existing neighborhoods and minimizing intrusions. The Project is also consistent with the R-1-40,000 District development standards, as modified by the specific development standards for the tennis court set forth in PUD-148.
Section 3: Findings for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Finds the Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The addition of six approximately 15-foot-tall tennis court lights is considered construction of new small facilities or accessory structures and is consistent with the applicable site development standards. The Project does not involve the use of significant amounts of
EXHIBIT A
ATTACHMENT 2
Resolution No. PC-2025-19
hazardous substances, all necessary public services and facilities are available, and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. Therefore, no additional environmental review is required.
Section 4: Criteria for Design Review Approval
With respect to the Administrative Design Review application, the Planning Commission finds the Project was reviewed and approved based on the nine criteria as required by Section 18.20.030 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code, which include the following:
1. Preservation of the natural beauty of the city and the project site's relationship to it;
2. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building to its site, including transition with streetscape, public views of the buildings, and scale of buildings within its site and adjoining buildings;
3. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building and its site to adjoining areas, including compatibility of architectural styles, harmony in adjoining buildings, attractive landscape transitions, and consistency with neighborhood character;
4. Preservation of views enjoyed by residents, workers within the city, and passersby through the community;
5. Landscaping designed to enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas, provide shade, and conform to established streetscape;
6. Relationship of exterior lighting to its surroundings and to the building and adjoining landscape;
7. Architectural style, as a function of its quality of design and relationship to its surroundings; the relationship of building components to one another/the building's colors and materials; and the design attention given to mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings;
8. Integration of signs as part of the architectural concept; and
9. Architectural concept of miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art in relationship to the site and landscape.
With respect to the above criteria, the Planning Commission finds the Project, as conditioned, would preserve and enhance the City’s aesthetic values and ensure the preservation of the public health, safety and general welfare. The Project is consistent with the allowable height, setbacks and other pertinent development standards of the PUD-LDR and subject to the R-1-40,000 District development standards in which it is located. The lighting is designed to harmonize and integrate with its surroundings by providing adequate illumination for the tennis court, while minimizing glare and spillover onto adjacent properties. The shielded, downward-directed tennis court lighting is appropriately sized and located in conformance with the existing property standards.
Section 5: The Planning Commission hereby affirms the Zoning Administrator’s decision approving Case No. P25-0236, an Administrative Design Review application to install six approximately 15-foot-tall tennis court lights in the rear yard at 2207 Martin
Resolution No. PC-2025-19
Avenue, subject to the Conditions of Approval shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 6: The Planning Commission directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption with the Alameda County Clerk.
Section 7: This resolution shall become effective 15 days after its passage and adoption unless appealed prior to that time. A decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by any interested party within 15 days of the date of the decision.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on September 10, 2025, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
ATTEST:
_____________________________ ______________________________ Melinda Denis Ken Morgan
Secretary, Planning Commission Chair
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Kimberly Cilley
Assistant City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
P25-0236
2207 Martin Avenue
September 10, 2025
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this approval, that (s)he is required to satisfy and maintain compliance with the conditions of approval below. Where approval by the Director of Community and Economic Development, Planning Division, Director of Engineering/City Engineer, City Attorney, Chief Building and Safety Official, Fire Department or other City staff is required, review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations, and accepted practices related to the approval. In addition to complying with the conditions below, the applicant is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws that pertain to this project whether or not specifically noted herein.
This approval is granted for an Administrative Design Review approval to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights, in the rear yard on Assessor Parcel No. 946-1146- 46, located at 2207 Martin Avenue. Development shall be substantially as shown on the project materials listed below:
a. Project plans, Exhibit B, prepared by Meenu Gochhwal and Ashish Choudhary, owners, dated “Received” on June 2, 2025, and kept on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department.
The project materials listed above are collectively the “Approved Plans.” THIS APPROVAL IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. APPROVAL AND REVISIONS: proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the “Approved Plans”, except as modified by the following conditions.
Minor changes to the plans may be allowed subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development if found to be in substantial conformance with the approved exhibits. Planning Division approval is required before any changes are implemented in site design, grading, architectural design, building colors or materials, green building measures, landscape material, etc.
2. EXPIRATION: Administrative Design Review approval shall lapse and become void one year following the effective date of project approval, unless prior to the expiration of one year, a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion or an extension has been approved by the City
3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CHECKLIST: The applicant shall submit a “Conditions of Approval Checklist” indicating all conditions in Exhibit A have been satisfied, incorporated into the building permit plans or improvements plans, and/or addressed. Said checklist
EXHIBIT A
ATTACHMENT 1
P25-0236 September 10, 2025
shall be incorporated as one of the first four plan sheets of all building permit and engineering permit plan submittals for review by the City prior to issuance of permits
4. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION: To the extent permitted by law, the project applicant shall hold harmless, defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), and indemnify the City, its City Council, its officers, commissions, employee and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and/or the applicant to attack, set aside, or void the approval of the project or any permit authorized hereby for the project, including without limitation, reimbursing the City its attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice.
PLANNING DIVISION – 925-931-5600
Tennis Court Lighting
5. All appropriate City permits shall be obtained prior to construction of the tennis court lighting
6. All six tennis court lights shall be down-directed so as to minimize any off-site light and glare, and be no taller than 15-feet measured vertically from the average elevation of the natural grade or finished grade, whichever is lower. Project specific condition
7. The three tennis court lights on the north side of the tennis court shall be shielded to minimize any off-site lighting spillover. Project specific condition
8. Light trespass across property lines onto adjacent residential property shall be limited to
0.1 foot-candle. Project specific condition
9. Hours of Illumination. No person or persons shall turn on, or allow to be left on, tennis court lights between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. daily. Project specific condition
10. Tennis court lights shall be on a timer which allows for a maximum duration of lighting that does not exceed two hours before shutting off lights to help ensure that lights are not inadvertently left on beyond the times specified above. Project specific condition
11. Final inspection by the Planning Division is required prior to use of tennis court lighting.
Project specific condition
12. All demolition and construction activities, inspections, plan checking, material delivery, staff assignment, or coordination, etc., shall be limited to the hours of 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be allowed on State or Federal Holidays or Sundays. The Director of Community Development may allow earlier “start-times” or later “stop-times” for specific construction activities (e.g., concrete pouring), if it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that the construction noise and construction traffic noise will not affect nearby residents or businesses. All construction equipment must meet Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
P25-0236 September 10, 2025
noise standards and shall be equipped with muffling devices. Prior to construction, the applicant shall post on the site the allowable hours of construction activity.
END
Parcel number: 946114646 – Owner: Meenu Gochhwal/Ashish Choudhary Project Overview and Scope:
• Installation of six 15-foot-tall light poles equipped with LED fixtures around the tennis court, as highlighted in orange.
• The poles will be positioned next to the court approximately 6 feet away from the adjacent neighbor’s property fence and approximately 33 feet from the rear property line.
• Each light fixture includes an 18 -inch extension arm, positioning the light fixtures further into the court and away from the adjacent property. • Fixtures will be downward -facing and equipped with anti -glare features and shields (on three fixtures adjacent neighbors’ side) to prevent any light spillover beyond the neighboring fence line.
• Tennis court Lights will have a light timer to ensure shut off of lights.
Martin Ave Dennis Drive
Extension arm 18” long being used positioning the light fixtures further into the court and away from the adjacent property.
Proactive Privacy and Screening Measures
To ensure privacy and mitigate any visual impact, the following landscaping and screening have been implemented:
• Mature 25-foot trees already line half the property boundary. • For the remaining half, six new 24 G trees (8–9 feet tall) and privet hedges (now 6–7 feet tall) have been planted along both the rear and adjacent fences. • Structural screening is further enhanced by a 6-foot fence on the adjacent side and a 7-foot fence at the rear.
Existing Illumination in Surroundings
Though the adjacent neighbor already has garage door lights and there is a streetlight at the rear of the property, the lighting design ensures that the neighbor’s driveway and garage remain unaffected by the tennis court lighting.
Lighting Impact and Neighbor Consideration
Photometric visuals confirm that:
• No light spillover occurs onto adjacent or rear properties. • The lighting direction and shielding comply with best practices to preserve neighboring privacy and minimize visual intrusion.
Request for Approval
We have taken all reasonable and proactive steps to be thoughtful neighbors, ensuring our lighting remains fully contained within our property boundaries.
We kindly request the City’s approval based on this detailed scope, design approach, and the enclosed supporting photometric documentation.
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Table of contents
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
Table of contents 1
Exterior Scene 1
Planning data 2
Luminaire parts list 3
Luminaires (layout plan) 4
Objects (layout plan) 5
3D Rendering 6
False Color Rendering 7
Exterior Surfaces
Neighbor's property
Surface 1
Isolines (E) 8
Dennis Dr
Surface 1
Isolines (E) 9
Yard
Surface 1
Isolines (E) 10
Tennis 1 Calculation Grid (PA)
Value Chart (E, Perpendicular) 11
Tennis 1 Calculation Grid (TA)
Value Chart (E, Perpendicular) 12
2207 Martin Ave
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / Planning data
Scale 1:436Luminaire Parts List
No. Pieces Designation (Correction Factor) (Luminaire) [lm] (Lamps) [lm] P [W] 1 3 EL-NED-240(TC) (1.000) 37424 37424 240.0
2 3 EL-NED-240(TC)-Z3A (1.000) 31956 37424 240.0
Total: 208138 Total: 224544 1440.0
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / Luminaire parts list
3 Pieces EL-NED-240(TC) 5000K
Luminous flux (Luminaire): 37424 lm
Luminous flux (Lamps): 37424 lm
Luminaire Wattage: 240.0 W
Luminaire classification according to CIE: 99 CIE
flux
code: 39
82 98 99 100
.
3 Pieces EL-NED-240(TC)-Z3A This fixture is with Shield
Luminous flux (Luminaire): 31956 lm
Luminous flux (Lamps): 37424 lm
Luminaire Wattage: 240.0 W
Luminaire classification according to CIE: 99 CIE
flux
code: 41
82 99 99 85
5000K
18" extension single arm to be used for poles
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / Luminaires (layout plan)
Scale 1 : 436
Luminaire Parts List
No. Pieces Designation
1 3 EL-NED-240(TC)
2 3 EL-NED-240(TC)-Z3A
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / Pole (layout plan)
Scale 1 : 436
Object parts list
No. Pieces Designation
1 6 pole-15ft
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / 3D Rendering
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / False Color Rendering
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / Neighbor's property / Surface 1 / Isolines (E) Values in Footcandles, Scale 1 : 369
Position of surface in external scene:
Marked point:
(-69.000 ft, 69.999 ft, 0.000 ft)
Grid: 12 x 56 Points
Eav [fc] Emin [fc] Emax [fc]
0.00 0.00 0.00
Zero Light Spillover Onto Adjacent-Side Property Along Dennis Drive
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / Dennis Dr / Surface 1 / Isolines (E) Values in Footcandles, Scale 1 : 334
Position of surface in external scene:
Marked point:
(-90.000 ft, -69.999 ft, 0.000 ft)
Grid: 7 x 47 Points
Eav [fc] Emin [fc] Emax [fc]
0.00 0.00 0.00
Zero Light Spillover Onto Rear-Side Properties Along Dennis Drive
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / Yard / Surface 1 / Isolines (E)
Values in Footcandles, Scale 1 : 368
Position of surface in external scene:
Marked point:
(-68.500 ft, 33.500 ft, 0.000 ft)
Grid: 21 x 34 Points
Eav [fc] Emin [fc] Emax [fc]
1.48 0.02 17
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / Tennis 1 Calculation Grid (PA) / Value Chart (E, Perpendicular) Values in Footcandles, Scale 1 : 170
Position of surface in external scene:
Marked point: (-39.000 ft, -18.000 ft,
0.000 ft)
Grid: 13 x 5 Points
Eav [fc] Emin [fc] Emax [fc] u0( Emin / Emax
27 13 37 0.50 0.36
- This is measure of lighting uniformity in the court.Emin / Emax Emin / Eav)
Residential Outdoor Tennis Court Lighting
08 / 29 / 2024
Operator
Telephone
Fax
e-Mail
Exterior Scene 1 / Tennis 1 Calculation Grid (TA) / Value Chart (E, Perpendicular) Values in Footcandles, Scale 1 : 240
Position of surface in external scene:
Marked point: (-55.000 ft, -27.500 ft,
0.000 ft)
Grid: 15 x 7 Points
Eav [fc] Emin [fc] Emax [fc] u0 Emin / Emax
25 7.37 39 0.30 0.19
(Emin / Eav)
Emin / Emax - This is measure of lighting uniformity in the court.
This letter is written by
Ray and Michele Peterson
3520 Dennis Drive
Pleasanton, CA
We are appealing the outcome of the Zoning Hearing dated July 18, 2025, regarding application P25-0236.
1. There is a conflict of interest with this application for 6 15-ft tennis court lights.
The Zoning Administrator responsible for making a decision on this application is the same planner who responded to the applicants' original inquiry about a tennis court with lights and fencing, disregarding any permits or setback requirements on an
R-1-40,000 lot.
The ZA also acknowledged that the applicants contacted him AFTER the court was already poured, 6 feet from the property line and light bases in place.
So essentially, the setbacks in place now were determined by the applicants themselves and the project was never just flat work.
See Attachment A.
2. When approving application P25-0236, the ZA's reasoning is not consistent with the Agenda Report for the Planning Commission meeting of May 22, 2024, written by the planning staff.
The report states:
"The addition of six (6) tennis court lights, not to exceed 15 feet, in height is considered construction of new small facilities or accessory structures."
The ZA stated the lights are now separate, not part of the "package", therefore not bound by the setback requirements of an accessory structure.
He gave no basis for this statement.
In this same meeting, the commissioners confirmed with planning staff that the setbacks for this project should have been 20 feet.
See Attachment B.
foot-tall poles are clearly permanent fixtures and must adhere to all setback regulations.
Granting an exception would create an unfair and unequal application of zoning laws.
Summary and Recommendation
In summary, the application for tennis court lighting should be denied because it:
Directly violates explicit and documented assurances made to the Planning Commission and neighbors.
Betrays the good faith agreement that led to the approval of the tennis court fence heights.
Clearly violates the 20-foot side yard setback requirement, a fundamental zoning regulation.
Allowing this proposal would reward deceptive practices and undermine the purpose of public hearings and planning regulations. The project, as now proposed, is significantly different from the one for which community and Planning Commission support was granted. The only correct course of action is to deny the installation of tennis court lighting and require the project to adhere to the previously approved plan.
Summary and Recommendation
In summary, the approval by the Zoning Administrator for tennis court lighting must be denied because it directly violates the project's established Development Standards, contradicts prior assurances made to the public and the Planning Commission, and violates existing setback regulations. These are not minor issues; they represent a fundamental change to the project that was not part of the original approval process. The only correct course of action is to deny the installation of tennis court lighting.
Alan Shapiro
9/3/25, 1:09 PM Mail - Diego Mora - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADU4YzE1MDI1LWJjYjEtNGUwNi04MGM0LWRmNjhlM2QzYmMzYwAQAPLl4o%2BMs0hfmQj4Xwo… 2/2
© Latitude Geographics Group Ltd.
2,598.5
THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION
NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_California_III_FIPS_0403_Ft_US Feet2,598.5
Notes
Notes
Legend
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable.
1,299.260
1: 15,591
Map Print Title
Fire Station
School
Park
Parcels
2207 MARTIN AVENUE
RECEIVED
PLEASANTON. SEP 25 2025
Corumunitv D vclopment Department I Planning Division 200 Old Bernal Ave.I P.O. BoxQ�°"6Yp�Js£�� c9f'4_��t° 925-931-5600 I pod(a),citvqfpleasantonca.gov
2025 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
�,�dministrative D� Review ($345)
Eppeal ofCaseW-fJ1qQ ($345)
□ Beekeeping ($207)
□ Condominium Conversion ($3,807)
Design Review
□ Minor job value< $25,000 ($345)
□ Major job value� $25,000 ($2,276)
Environmental (CEOA) Fees
□ Staff review of Consultant Work
(25% of consultant costs)
D 2025 CEOA Filing Fees
(CEQA Doc.: _____ �
□ General Plan Amendment ($20,509)
Home Occupation/Cottage Foods
□ Non-exempt-no hearing ($138)
D Non-exempt -with hearing ($345)
Housing Site Complian.ceRevicw
D 50 units or less ($9,465)
□ 51 units or more ($10,415)
□ Lot-Line Adjustment ($593)
D Outdoor Dining/Display ($ I 93)
□Over-height Fence Permit ($34)
CHECK TYPE OF APPLICATION(S)
□ PC Determination ($2,069)
Preliminary Review
□ SB 330 ($1,518)
□With Hearing ($2,000)
PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Residential -
DI unit ($4,138)
D 2-5 units ($10,344)
D 6-15 units ($20,688)
□ 16+units($27,584)
Commercial
□ 0-20,000 sq ft ($4,138)
□ 20,001-60,000 sq ft ($10,344)
□ 60,001-100,000 sq ft ($20,688)
□ 100,001+ sq ft ($27,584)
PUD Modifications
D Minor existing residential ($13 8)
□ Minor ($690)
□ Major ($2,758)
Rezoning
D without PUD ($16,950)
D with PUD ($2,758)
□ Sign Design Review ($483)
□ Specific Plan/Specific Plan Amend.
(min. 25% of consultant fee) ($2,633)
Small Wireless Facility
D Public ROW ($4,348)
D Private Property ($4,088)
D Pole Lie. Agreement ($303)
Subdivision Map
□ Tentative Tract Map ($6,400)
□ Minor Subdivision ($690)
Use Permits
□ Conditional ($1,034)
□ Minor Conditional ($690)
D Pets ($276)
D Temporary Conditional ($193)
D Administrative Temporary ($34)
Variance
D General ($3,117)
D Developed Residential Lot ($690)
D Other ________ _
Refer to the appropriate lnfom1ational Handout for required submittal information that must accompany this application.
REQUIRED INFORMATION
A. Project Address(es):
B. Assessor's Parcel Number(s):
C. Description of Proposal: -------------------------------- D. PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as the property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal period. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: MY and M I QKB,£ t11FJ1sci
Company: _________________ _
MailingAd<licess � T)Bi/fJIC:, Q{2_
Signature�
Pa e 1 of3
Telephone: _qc...._2, _'J_---_:2_(_v_-----=----7=-{i?--=(;?_5?:...,____ E-mail:mieheL� fh Dtf trsevi (o)a
I Cm'lcosl/1
Date: Cfl--J 5 "',l-D-µ5
Attachment 2
© Latitude Geographics Group Ltd.
2,598.5
THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION
NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_California_III_FIPS_0403_Ft_US Feet2,598.5
Notes
Notes
Legend
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable.
1,299.260
1: 15,591
Map Print Title
Fire Station
School
Park
Parcels
Attachment 4
2207 MARTIN AVENUE
10/15/2025
1 P25-0236, 2207 Martin AvenueCity CouncilNovember 4, 2025 Application: P25-0236Appeal of the Planning Commission’s determination to uphold the Zoning Administrator’s approval of an application for Administrative Design Review to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights in the rear yard located at 2207 Martin Avenue, filed under Case No. P25-0236Appeal of the Planning Commission’s determination to uphold the Zoning Administrator’s approval of an application for Administrative Design Review to install six, approximately 15-foot-1 2
10/15/2025
2 Project Location
N
N
Entitlement Background/TimelineAug. 23, 2023:Dec. 13, 2023:Feb. 6/Jan. 16, 2024:MJuly 18th, 2025: Aug. 4, 2025:Sept. 10, 2025:SMay 22, 2024:Planning Commission denied ADR for Tennis Court Lights, filed as P24-0278PC Hearing, Reaffirm COA’s& Rec’d Approval of PUD-148Appellant filed an appeal of ZA Approval for P25-0236Sept. 25, 2025:Appellant filed an appeal of the PC decision for ADR P5-0236PC Hearing, PUD-148 to Establish Devt. Stds. & Tennis CourtCity Council, Introduce/Adopt PUD-148ZA Hearing & Approved P25-0236, Second ADR for Tennis Court LightsPC Hearing, Adopted Reso. to uphold the ZA’s approval of ADR P25-02363 4
10/15/2025
3 AppealThe bases of the appeal include (Attachment 3): •Not being able to attend the September 10, 2025, Planning Commission appeal hearing date.•Classification of the proposed tennis court lights and fencing as a Class 1 accessory structure, which requires a 20-foot setback.•The overall tennis court project history.
Development Standards
5 6
10/15/2025
4 Proposed Tennis Court Lights•Light Pole Height: 15’•Setbacks:•6’ from the north side property line (adjacent to Appellant’s property)•33’ from the west rear property line (adjacent to Dennis Dr.) Proposed Tennis Court Lights
N7
8
10/15/2025
5 Lighting Impacts
Lighting Impacts
9 10
10/15/2025
6 Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
11 12
10/15/2025
7 Existing Conditions/Screening Measure
Public CommentsNoticed neighbors expressed concerns about:•Proximity of the tennis court lights to nearby residences•Potential lighting and traffic impacts, including light pollution•Height of the light poles•Aesthetic considerations•Tennis court setbacks•Consistency with the Planning Commission’s prior denial. 13 14
10/15/2025
8 RecommendationAdopt a resolution upholding the Planning Commission’s determination upholding the Zoning Administrator’s determination to approve an application for Administrative Design Review to install six, approximately 15-foot-tall, tennis court lights in the rear yard of a property located at 2207 Martin Avenue, filed under Case No. P25-0236, based on the required findings and subject to the draft Conditions of Approval listed in Attachment 1.
End15
16
Item #10
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
November 4, 2025
City Manager
TITLE: CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 21, 2025 - AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CITYGATE
ASSOCIATES, LLC FOR A COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT IN A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $249,982
SUMMARY
Following a competitive Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process, including two rounds of interviews with finalist firms, staff recommends awarding a professional services agreement to Citygate Associates, LLC for a comprehensive citywide organizational assessment. The 12- month assessment will evaluate operational efficiencies, organizational structure, staffing resources, customer service delivery, and revenue opportunities.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Citygate Associates, LLC for a comprehensive citywide organizational assessment in a not-to-exceed amount of $249,982.
BACKGROUND
The City of Pleasanton recently engaged in extensive community engagement regarding the budget and strategies to address the City's fiscal deficit, including the need to evaluate citywide operations for operational efficiencies. To achieve this, staff identified an organizational assessment as a Priority 1 "Must-Do" project in the recently City Council- approved project prioritization framework for Fiscal Years 2025/26 and 2026/27. The goal of the project is to evaluate operational effectiveness, resource allocation, and strategic alignment of critical municipal departments. The City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) on July 11, 2025, generating ten qualified responses.
An evaluation panel from the City Manager's Office, Finance Department, and Human Resources Department reviewed all proposals. Vendors were evaluated based on their understanding of the City's needs, relevant municipal experience, available resources, including adequate staffing and expertise to handle all assessment tasks, references from similar California cities, and cost. Proposal costs ranged from $84,000 to $413,815. Based on the evaluation criteria, the top three firms (Citygate Associates, BakerTilly, Raftelis) were selected for two rounds of interviews.
Vendors provided additional information on communication support and an optional assessment of the Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD). The optional LPFD assessment was not included in the base scope as it would require coordination with the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Joint Powers Authority and cost-sharing discussions with the City of Livermore. Staff will return to the City Council with a separate recommendation after a determination is made.
Table 1. RFQ Response Summary
Qualified Vendors Project Duration Communication
Support
Optional: LPFD
Assessment
Baseline Cost
BakerTilly 7 Months $21,500 $16,500 $184,000
Citygate
Associates
12 Months $20,000 $40,000 $229,982
Raftelis 8 Months $12,000 $24,250 $179,925
Ultimately, staff recommends Citygate Associates. Although Citygage provides a higher cost proposal compared to the other two top vendors, it offers a more detailed and robust project scope and stood out among all other proposals with its depth of team expertise, proven experience, and strong understanding of the City’s needs.
DISCUSSION
RFQ Process
The RFQ initially focused on three departments (Development Services, Public Works, and Police). However, during the interview process, consultant consensus indicated that a baseline approach covering all City departments (excluding LPFD) would provide greater value and more actionable recommendations. Consultants noted that operational challenges span multiple departments, talent retention has organization-wide root causes, and recommendations are more effectively implemented when viewed holistically.
Citygate Associates, LLC was selected based on:
• Extensive California municipal experience (including El Cerrito, West Hollywood, Sonora, and Monterey County)
• Proven track record with comprehensive assessments
• Customized methodology to meet Pleasanton’s needs
• Strong implementation action plans
Project Scope/Timeline
The assessment will be conducted over 12 months, following five core tasks:
Task 1: Initiate the Project (Months 1-2)
• Project kickoff meetings with City leadership
• Develop stakeholder communication and engagement plan • Obtain and review documentation from all departments
Task 2: Communicate with and Involve Stakeholders (Months 2-3) • On-site interviews with City Council members
• Individual and group interviews with department personnel and City Manager
Task 3: Conduct Organizational Assessment (Months 4-8)
• Conduct comparable agency survey (4-6 agencies)
• High-level assessment of departmental structure, reporting, and staffing for all departments
• Process and efficiency evaluation
• Assessment of reporting and accountability systems
• Address high-priority areas for Development Services, Public Works, and Police
Task 4: Present Draft Findings and Recommendations (Months 8-10) • Mid-Project Review with City leadership to discuss preliminary findings • Additional focused analysis based on City input
• Prepare comprehensive Draft Report with recommendations and implementation strategy
Task 5: Prepare and Present Final Report (Months 11-12) • Deliver Final Report and Implementation Action Plan
• Present findings to City Council and management team
Citygate Associates will conduct a comprehensive assessment using document review, interviews with the City Council, directors and key personnel, staff focus groups, peer benchmarking, workload analysis, and financial analysis. The assessment will evaluate:
• Departmental structure, reporting relationships, and alignment with Council goals • Staffing levels, vacancies, and workload distribution • Process efficiencies and bottlenecks
• Technology effectiveness and enhancement opportunities • Performance metrics and accountability systems
• Cross-departmental workflows and coordination
Key Deliverables
The consultant will provide a comprehensive written report containing detailed analysis of each department, organizational structure recommendations, staffing proposals and resource allocation strategies, process improvement recommendations, technology enhancement opportunities, and cost-benefit analysis of major recommendations. An Implementation Action Plan will accompany the report, featuring prioritized recommendations with clear timelines, a phased implementation approach, resource requirements and budget implications, performance metrics and success indicators, and assignment of responsible parties for each recommendation. Citygate Associates will deliver formal presentations to City Council, provide briefings for the management team, and conduct department leadership sessions. Upon completion, the organizational assessment will provide City Council and staff with a strategic framework for evaluating and improving service delivery to meet current and future community needs.
EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
An organizational assessment advances operational excellence and fiscal sustainability by examining service delivery, accessibility, and employee development opportunities. The comprehensive citywide approach ensures equity considerations are evaluated systematically across all departments.
OUTREACH
The RFQ was posted through the City's website, receiving ten responses.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This action advances the ONE Pleasanton strategic plan Goal B. Optimizing Our Organization:
Organizational Effectiveness and is listed as a "Must-Do" project in the project prioritization framework for Fiscal Years 2025/26 and 2026/27.
FISCAL IMPACT
The not-to-exceed amount of $249,982 includes communication support ($20,000). Funding is budgeted in the City Manager’s contingency fund, non-departmental budget [Fund 00199100/Professional Services 430101].
An investment in a comprehensive organizational assessment is anticipated to generate cost savings and operational efficiencies through the implementation of Citygate Associates' recommendations. Based on Citygate Associates' experience with comparable municipalities, organizational assessments typically identify opportunities for cost savings, revenue enhancement, and efficiency improvements that will exceed the cost of the study when implemented.
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:
Sharon Petrehn, Principal
Analyst
Alexa Jeffress, Assistant City Manager
Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:
1. Professional Services Agreement with Citygate Associates, LLC
2. Citygate Associates, LLC Proposal
3. Presentation
PROF
ESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into this 21st day of October 2025, between the CITY OF PLEASANTON, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Citygate Associates, a Limited Liability Corporation (LLC), whose address is 600 Coolidge Drive, Suite 150, Folsom, CA 95630, and telephone number is 916-827-3616, (“Consultant”).
RECIT
ALS
A. Consul
tant is qualified to and experienced in providing a citywide organizational assessment for the purposes specified in this Agreement.
B. Cit
y finds it necessary and advisable to use the services of the Consultant for the purposes provided in this Agreement.
NOW T
HEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions in this Agreement, City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. Co
nsultant’s Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A. Consultant shall provide said services at that time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.
2. Ci
ty Assistance, Facilities, Equipment and Clerical Support. Except as set forth in Exhibit A, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment that may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall furnish to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit A according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A.
3. Term. T
his contract shall commence on the date written above and shall expire on December 21, 2026.
4. Com
pensation. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A. The payments shall be made on a monthly basis upon receipt and approval of Consultant’s invoice. Total compensation for services and reimbursement for costs shall not exceed $249,982.
a. Invoic
es submitted to City must contain a brief description of work performed, time used and City reference number. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant’s invoice and approved by City.
b. Upon com
pletion of work and acceptance by City, Consultant shall have sixty (60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may be granted by City upon Attachment 1
r
eceiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance of said time limitation. The City shall have no obligation or liability to pay any invoice for work performed which the Consultant fails or neglects to submit within sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after the work is accepted by the City.
5. Sufficiency of Consultant’s Work. All work product and all other documents prepared by Consultant shall be adequate and sufficient to meet the purposes for which they are prepared.
6. Ownership of Work. All work product and all other documents completed or partially completed by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall become the property of the City. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Consultant shall replace them at its own expense. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Consultant agrees to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. Consultant shall keep materials confidential. Materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Agreement and shall not be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services, unless the City provides prior written consent.
7. Changes. City may request changes in the scope of services to be provided by Consultant.
Any changes and related fees shall be mutually agreed upon between the parties and subject to a written amendment to this Agreement.
8. Consultant’s Status. In performing the obligations set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall have the status of an independent contractor and Consultant shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Consultant are its agents and employees and are not agents or employees of City. 9 . Termination for Convenience of City. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Consultant. The Agreement shall then be deemed terminated, and no further work shall be performed by Consultant. If the Agreement is so terminated, the Consultant shall be paid for that percentage of the work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received.
10 . Non-Assignability. The Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any interest or obligation in the Agreement without the prior written consent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City may set forth in writing. Consultant shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subcontractors.
11 . Indemnity and Hold Harmless. Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, the City and its officers, agents and employees from and against all claims, losses, damage, injury, and liability for damages arising from, or alleged to have arisen from, errors, omissions, negligent or wrongful acts of the Consultant in the performance of its services under this Agreement, regardless of whether the City has reviewed or approved the work or services which has given rise to the claim, loss, damage, injury or liability for damages. This indemnification shall extend for a reasonable period of time after completion of the project as well as during the period of actual performance of services under this Agreement. The City’s acceptance of the insurance certificates required under this Agreement does not relieve the Consultant from its obligation under this paragraph.
1 2. Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect, at its own cost and expense, insurance coverages with insurers with an A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII. Contractor shall have the obligation to furnish City, as additional insured, the minimum coverages identified below, or such greater or broader coverage for City, if available in the Contractor’s policies:
a. G
eneral Liability and Bodily Injury Insurance. Commercial general liability insurance with limits of at least $2,000,000 combined limit for bodily injury and property damage that provides that the City, its officers, employees and agents are named as additional insureds under the policy as evidenced by an additional insured endorsement satisfactory to the City Attorney.
The policy shall state in writing either on the Certificate of Insurance or attached rider that this insurance will operate as primary insurance for work performed by Consultant and its subconsultants, and that no other insurance effected by City or other named insured will be called on to cover a loss.
b. A
utomobile Liability Insurance. Automobile liability insurance with limits not less than $2,000,000 per person/per occurrence.
c. W
orkers’ Compensation Insurance. Workers’ Compensation Insurance for all of Consultant’s employees, in strict compliance with State laws, including a waiver of subrogation and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limits of at least $1,000,000. d. P
rofessional Liability Insurance. Professional liability insurance in the amount of $2,000,000.
e. C
ertificate of Insurance. Consultant shall file a certificate of insurance with the City prior to the City’s execution of this Agreement, and prior to engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Agreement. The Certificate of Insurance shall provide in writing that the insurance afforded by this Certificate shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits without providing notice to the City in accordance with California Insurance Code section 677.2 which requires the notice of cancellation to: 1) include the effective date of the cancellation; 2) include the reasons for the cancellation; and 3) be given at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the cancellation, except that in the case of cancellation for nonpayment of premiums or for fraud, the notice shall be given no less than 10 days prior to the effective date of the cancellation. Notice shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. In addition, the insured shall provide thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City of any cancellation, suspension, reduction of coverage or in limits, or voiding of the insurance coverage required by this agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete certified copies of policies.
f. W
aiver of Subrogation. The insurer agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, employees and agents.
g. D
efense Costs. Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf of” basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusions. These provisions do not apply to Professional Liability.
h. S
ubcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated in this Agreement, including but not limited naming additional insureds.
1 3. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
T
o Consultant: Chad Jackson, President To City: City Manager Citygate Associates, LLC City of Pleasanton
600 Coolidge Drive, Suite 150 P.O. Box 520
Folsom, CA 95630 Pleasanton, CA 94566
14 . Conformance to Applicable Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances. Consultant shall not discriminate in the employment of persons or in the provision of services under this Agreement on the basis of any legally protected classification, including race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person.
15 . Licenses, Certifications and Permits. Prior to the City’s execution of this Agreement and prior to the Consultant’s engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a City of Pleasanton business license, which must be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement. Consultant covenants that it has obtained all certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform the services under this Agreement. 16 . Records and Audits. Consultant shall maintain all records regarding this Agreement and the services performed for a period of three years from the date that final payment is made. At any time during normal business hours, the records shall be made available to the City to inspect and audit.
17 . Confidentiality. Consultant shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions. 18 . Conflicts of Interest. Consultant covenants that other than this Agreement, Consultant has no financial interest with any official, employee or other representative of the City. Consultant and its principals do not have any financial interest in real property, sources of income or investment that would be affected in any manner of degree by the performance of Consultant’s services under this Agreement. If such an interest arises, Consultant will immediately notify the City.
19 . Waiver. In the event either City or Consultant at any time waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Agreement, whether of the same or of any other covenant, condition or obligation. 2 0. Governing Law. California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to this Agreement with venue in the applicable court or forum for Alameda County.
21 . No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Consultant. 22 . Exhibits. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference incorporated herein.
23 . Counterparts and Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement. Counterparts may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including pdf or any electronic signature complying with U.S. federal E-Sign Act of 2000 (15 U.S. Code §7001 et seq.), California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Cal. Civil Code §1633.1 et seq.), or other applicable law) or other transmission method, and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.
24. Scope of Agreement. This writing constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties.
Any modification to the Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties.
TH
IS AGREEMENT executed the date and year first above written.
CI
TY OF PLEASANTON CONSULTANT
__________________________
By: __________________________
Gerry Beaudin, City Manager Signature
A
TTEST: __________________________
Print name
__________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk Its: __________________________ Title
A
pproved as to form:
_____________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney
[If Consultant is a corporation, signatures must comply with California Corporations Code §313] Rev. 11/23
EX
HIBIT A
S
cope of Consultant’s Services
!
.$%123".$).'/&
1/*%#3
#/0%/&!/1+
1/*%#3/.3%73 )'(,)'(32/&
1/*%#3001/"#(
1/&),%/&22%22-%.3"#3/12
/,)#%
%15)#%2001/"#(
!/1+
,"./1%
1/*%#3
#/0% "2+.)3)"3%".$"."'%3(%
1/*%#3 "2+/--4.)#"3%6)3(".$.5/,5%
3"+%(/,$%12 "2+ /.$4#31'".)9"3)/.",22%22-%.3 "2+
1%2%.31"&3).$).'2".$
%#/--%.$"3)/.2".$
1%0"1%1"&3
%0/13
"2+
1%0"1%".$
1%2%.3).",
%0/13
)5%1-/1%
,%"2".3/.)1%%0"13-%.3
22%22-%.3
1/0/2%$
1/*%#3
#(%$4,%&/170".$%$
#/0%
0$"3%$
1/*%#3 %"-22)'.-%.32
1/0/2",/23 "2%
1/*%#3/23 03)/.",)5%1-/1%
,%"2".3/.)1%%0"13-%.322%22-%.3 /41,8
"3%2
),,).'
#(%$4,%
!
$/0::,*;06579,:,5;:0;@.(;,F:% $7961,*;(7796(*/;6*65+<*;;/,0;@>0+, 9.(50A(;065(3 ::,::4,5;
"$
$#-6336>,+)@(:05.3,05;,.9(;,+&692!3(5(5+(+0:*<::0656- 7961,*;(++ 65:05*3<+05.(*644<50*(;065:73(5(5+(5(::,::4,5;6-;/, 0=,9469, !3,(:(5;65
09,,7(9;4,5;
$/,:,*;065*65*3<+,:>0;/(5<7+(;,+;04,305, -69;/,,?7(5+,+:*67,6- :,9=0*,:(5+(5<7+(;,+!961,*;$,(469.(50A(;065*/(9;:/6>05. (::0.5,+*65:<3;(5;:-69,(*/ +,7(9;4,5;
0;@.(;,<5+,9:;(5+:;/,0;@:,,2:=(3<()3,05-694(;065 (5+05:0./;:65/6>;6),:;796=0+,:,9=0*,:;6;/,
*644<50;@@6<:,9=,
&,<5+,9:;(5+;/(;;/,0;@/(:
3040;,+-05(5*0(39,:6<9*,:(5+0:7961,*;05.(:,=,9,(5+ 05*9,(:05.:;9<*;<9(3+,-0*0;6-
40330656=,9;/,5,?;
,0./;@,(9:
(3(5*05.;/,0;@F:+,:09,;64(05;(05/0./
:,9=0*,3,=,3:(5+;6(+/,9,;6;/,0;@F:
B
#;9(;,.0*!3(5>0;/;/,-05(5*0(39,(30;0,:@6<-(*,9,8<09,: (;/696<./(5(3@:0:6-(330;@-<5*;065:(5+;/6<./;-<3 *9,(;0=,9,*644,5+(;065:
$/0:(5(3@:0:>033:,,2;6-05+
365. ;,94:<:;(05()3,*6:; :(=05.4,(:<9,:(5+,30405(;, 9,+<5+(5*0,: >(:;, (5+ 05,--0*0,5; 69 <55,*,::(9@ 67,9(;065:
&,*644,5+;/,0;@6-!3,(:(5;65-69
<5+,9;(205.;/0:04769;(5;7961,*;
0;@.(;, 79676:,: ;6 7,9-694 (5 9.(50A(;065(3
::,::4,5; 6- (33 0;@ +,7(9;4,5;: -69 ;/, 0;@ 6- !3,(:(5;65
$/, 6)1,*;0=, 6- ;/, :;<+@ 0: ;6 796=0+,
=(3<()3,05-694(;065-690;@+,*0:0654(2,9:65/6>;6 ),:;796=0+,:,9=0*,:;6;/,*644<50;@.0=,5;/,0;@F: 3040;,+-05(5*0(39,:6<9*,:
0;@.(;,>033,=(3<(;,*<99,5;
*65+0;065: (5(3@A, 67769;<50;0,: -69 69.(50A(;065(3 */(5.,: (5+ 796*,:: 04796=,4,5;: ;/(; *(5 -<9;/,9 ,5/(5*,:,9=0*,;6*<:;64,9:(5+:;(2,/63+,9:,=(3<(;, -<;<9,:,9=0*,+,4(5+:(5++,=,367(5473,4,5;(;065
*;065!3(5>0;/(790690;0A,+0473,4,5;(;065:*/,+<3,6-9,*644,5+(;065:(5+67;065:-69/6>;6
!
(+1<:;:,9=0*,:(5+67,9(;065:;6,5:<9,365. ;,94-0:*(3:<:;(05()030;@(5+4(05;(05;/,/0./8<(30;@ 6-30-,05@6<9*644<50;@
5*3<+,+ 05 ;/0: 6)1,*;0=, 0: (5 ,47/(:0: 65 0+,5;0-@05. 67769;<50;0,: -69 *96:: -<5*;065(3 *633()69(;065(5+469,,--0*0,5;:/(905.6-9,:6<9*,:(465.0; @+,7(9;4,5;:(5++,=,36705. :,9=0*,+,30=,9@7,9-694(5*,4,(:<9,:(5+),5*/4(92:;64,(:<9,796.9,::
#
$$$$## #"&##
#
$
)"
$# "
)
$$),#!%#$ "%
$
#$ "
$ %"%
"#$
'#$$ "##$
$),# " "$# #$$&
)$"
&
'$#
# $&$)$ $
$
$)#$
#
%
$
%#
)"&'
"$
$
69,(*/+,7(9;4,5;0;@.(;,>0337,9-694;/,-6336>05.
♦ !,9-694/0./ 3,=,3(::,::4,5;6-+,7(9;4,5;(3:;9<*;<9, =(3<(;,*69,+,7(9;4,5;(3-<5*;065:(5+796*,::,:-69(30.54,5;>0;/0;@ 6<5*03.6(3:(5+0;@790690;0,:
",=0,> 9,769;05. :;9<*;<9,: 963,: (5+ 9,:765:0)030;0,: ;6 0+,5;0-@ 9,+<5+(5*0,:.(7:6905,--0*0,5*0,:
5(3@A,:;(--05.3,=,3:=(*(5*0,:(5+>69236(++0:;90)<;065; 6(::,:: 9,:6<9*,(336*(;065(5+)(3(5*,
♦ !,9-694/0./ 3,=,3(::,::4,5;6-796*,::(5+,--0*0,5*@ ::,::;/,,--,*;0=,5,::6-*<99,5;/<4(5-05(5*0(3(5+;,*/5 636.0*(3 9,:6<9*,:054,,;05.+,7(9;4,5;(36)1,*;0=,:
+,5;0-@05,--0*0,5*0,:69)6;;3,5,*2:052,@796*,::,:(5+9,* 644,5+ 67769;<50;0,:-6904796=,4,5;69*6:;:(=05.:
♦ !,9-694/0./ 3,=,3(::,::4,5;6-9,769;05.(5+(**6<5;()030;@ ",*644,5+:@:;,4:(5+;663:;6,5/(5*,(**6<5;()030;@(5+4(05; (05 :,9=0*,8<(30;@(*96::+,7(9;4,5;:
♦ 5.(.,>0;/05;,95(3:;(2,/63+,9:05*3<+05.:;(--05(33+,7(9; 4,5;:(5+,3,*;,+ 6--0*0(3:;6.(;/,9-,,+)(*29,.(9+05.76;,5;0(367769;<50;0,:-6904796=,4,5;:;6 ,--0*0,5*@*<:;64,9:,9=0*,(5+69.(50A(;065(3*<3;<9,
♦ 9(4,9,*644,5+(;065:;/(;79,:,5;;/,46:;*6:; ,--,*;0=,(5+ :;9(;,.0*>(@;6 4,,;*<99,5;(5+-<;<9,5,,+:>/03,79646;05.(*<3;<9,6-/0. /7,9-694(5*, (**6<5;()030;@ ;9(5:7(9,5*@ (5+ *644<50;@ ,5.(.,4,5; (5+ ,5:<905. *65:0:;,5*@05;/,(7730*(;0656-3(>:*6+,:(5+6;/,99,.<3(;065:
!
♦ ",*644,5+79(*;0*(3(5+(*/0,=()3,:63<;065:;/(;
3(90-@963,:9,:765:0)030;0,:(5+(<;/690;@6-:;(-- 30405(;, +<730*(;065 (5+ 6=,93(7 6- 9,:765:0)030;0,: >0;/05 ,(*/ +,7(9;4,5;(5+),;>,,56;/,90;@+,7(9;4,5;:
4796=,;/,+,30=,9@;04,(5+8<(30;@6-:,9=0*,:796=0+,+)@, (*/ +,7(9;4,5;
4796=,*644<50*(;065:>0;/05(5+),;>,,5+,7(9;4,5;: 4796=,*644<50*(;065:>0;/*<:;64,9:(5+:;(2,/63+,9: +,5;0-@67769;<50;0,:-695,>;,*/5636.@;/(;>6<3+9,+<*,9,: 6<9*, +,4(5+:
=(3<(;,-<;<9,:,9=0*,+,4(5+:(5+,=(3<(;,:;(--05.3,=,3:-<5+05.(5+ 9,=,5<,:6<9*,:;64,,;;/(;+,4(5+
<;305,(=(90,;@6-*6:;9,+<*;065:;9(;,.0,:>0;/05)6;/79,:,5;(5+-<;<9, :*,5(906:;6(30.5:,9=0*,+,30=,9@.6(3:>0;/(=(03()3,9,:6<9*,:
#7,*0-0*+,7(9;4,5;(3790690;0,:>033),(++9,::,+-69,=,3674 ,5;#,9=0*,:!<)30*&692:(5+ !630*,(:-6336>:>0;/:7,*0-0*(9,(:6-,47/(:0:-696;/,9+,7(9;4,5;:+,;,9405,+05*651<5*;065 >0;/;/,0;@;/96<./6<;;/,*6<9:,6-;/,:;<+@
♦ ,=,3674,5;#,9=0*,:644<50;@*65640*,=,3674,5;<:05,:: 0*,5:,
5.05,,905.
$04,305,::(5+,--0*0,5*@6-7,940;796*,::05.
$,*/5636.@:@:;,4,=(3<(;0657,940;;9(*205.65305,769;(3: <:;64,9:,9=0*,:;(5+(9+:(5+7,9-694(5*,4,;90*: <:05,::30*,5:,9,5,>(3(5+*64730(5*,,--0*0,5*@*65;9(*;=:
05 /6<:,
♦ !<)30*&692:
%(*(5;76:0;0659,*9<0;4,5;:;9(;,.@
&(;,9
:,>,967,9(;065:(5(3@:0:
65;9(*;=:
05 /6<:,:,9=0*,+,30=,9@
♦ !630*,
#;(--05.+,736@4,5;(5+7(;963*6=,9(.,(5(3@:0:
!
",:765:,;04,,=(3<(;065
$,*/5636.@<;030A(;0659,*69+:4(5(.,4,5;46)03,9,769;05. !,9-694(5*,4,;90*:(5+(**6<5;()030;@:@:;,4:
$9(0505.796.9(4,--,*;0=,5,::9,=0,>
3,(+,9:/07;9(0505.
0;@.(;,F:79676:,+4,;/6+636.@0:)<03;(96<5+
;/,-6336>05.*69,,3,4,5;:
%!!
0;@.(;,>033>692>0;/:;(--;6.(;/,9(33(=(03()3,
+6*<4,5;(;0659,.(9+05.69.(50A(;065(3:;9<*;<9,
:;(--05.7630*0,:796*,+<9,:7,9-694(5*,+(;(
)<+.,;: (5+ ;,*/5636.@
<9 :<)1,*; 4(;;,9
,?7,9;:>0339,=0,>(5+(5(3@A,;/,+6*<4,5;(;065
;6 *9,(;, ( )96(+ <5+,9:;(5+05. 6- ,(*/
+,7(9;4,5;F:67,9(;065(3:;9,5.;/:(5+>,(25,::,:
<9;,*/50*( 3(5(3@:0:>033(3:605*3<+,;/,
-6336>05.*69,,3,4,5;:
"
# !
&, >033 ,=(3<(;, ,(*/ +,7(9;4,5;F: :,9=0*, 3,=,3: (5+ :;(5+(9+: 7,9-694(5*, 4,(:<9,: 7,9-694(5*,9,769;05.(5+;/,,4736@,,7,9-694(5*,4(5(.,4,5; :@:;,4-69(30.54,5;>0;/ :;(2,/63+,9,?7,*;(;065:
&,>0339,=0,>(;(/0./3,=,3;/, *<99,5;67,9(;05.7630*0,:(5+ 796*,+<9,:>692-36>:69.(50A(;065(3:;9<*;<9,(5+4(5(.,4,5; :@:;,4::7(5:6-*65;963
69.(50A(;065(39,3(;065:/07:05;,9+0=0:065(3(5+05;,9+,7(9;4,5;(3*669+05(;065*644<50*(;065: 05-694(;065:@:;,4:(+4050:;9(;065(5+:<7,9=0:06516)+<;0,:67769;<50;0,:-696<;:6<9*05.69 05:6<9*05.90:24(5(.,4,5;*669+05(;065(5+79(*;0*,:6=,9;04 ,4(5(.,4,5;79(*;0*,:3()69 (.9,,4,5;:(5+9,3(;,+(:7,*;:;64(2,-05+05.:(5++,;,9405,9,*644,5+(;065:
%
$
"
&,>033-6*<:65(::,::05.,?0:;05.(5+-<;<9,:,9=0*,+,4(5+ (336*(;0656-:;(--;64,,;;/,:, +,4(5+::;(--9,;,5;065(5+9,*9<0;4,5;;9(0505.5,,+:(5+9,:6<9*,:796-,::065(3+,=,3674,5; (7796(*/,:;6:<7769;:<**,::06573(5505.;663:(5+;,*/5636.@(=(03()3,;6:;(--(5+;/,6=,9(33 :;(--05.:;9(;,.@
•
"
"
•
"
!
•
•
!
&,>033,=(3<(;,;/,*<99,5;)<+.,;(5+-<5+05.3,=,3:05*3<+05.(5(::,::4,5;6-;/,()030;@;6 4(05;(05(5+
69,5/(5*,:,9=0*,3,=,3:(;;9(*;(5+9,;(05:;(- -(5+0473,4,5;5,>;,*/5636.@
&,>033796=0+,9,*644,5+(;065:65(3;,95(;0=,(7796(*/,:;6-< 5+05.0-(7796790(;,.0=,5 *<99,5;-<5+05.7961,*;,++,4(5+;,*/5636.@5,,+:(5+ 69*/(5.,:05:,9=0*,:*67,693,=,3:
"
"
#;(2,/63+,9,5.(.,4,5;0:7,9/(7:;/,46:;04769;(5;:;,705(5,--0*0,5*@:;<+@ 6)6+@256>:
),;;,9>/,9,67769;<50;0,:30,;/(5;/,7,673,>/6,?,*<;,;/, 796*,::,:,=,9@+(@69>/6(9, +,7,5+,5;65;/6:,:,9=0*,:-69;/,0930=,30/66+
$/,),:;:63<;065:6-;,5*64,-964)9(05:;69405.
>0;/:;(2,/63+,9:
&/03,;/,9,4(@),+0--,9,5;7,9:7,*;0=,:-9 64(=(90,;@6-7(9;0*07(5;:0;0: (3>(@:9,>(9+05.;6-05+/6>7,673,65+0--,9,5;:0+,:6-;/,;()3,:,,2;/,:(4,:63<;065:
<9
;,(4>033,5*6<9(.,/65,:;-,,+)(*2(:205.-69:;(2,/63+,9057 <;),-69,6--,905.6<9:-69;/,09 *90;08<,
&,*(5;/,5:@5;/,:0A,;/,-,,+)(*2>0;/),5*/4(9205. :;(5+(9+:7,9-694(5*,+(;( (5+(=(03()3,9,:6<9*,:;6-9(4,9,*644,5+(;065:
<9&692!3(505*3<+,:1605;3@+,=,36705.(
*644<50*(;065(5+,5.(.,4,5;73(5>0;/;/,0;@
"#!"
&"
603,973(;,9,*644,5+(;065:(9,56;6<9.6(3(;0;@.(;, -;,9*6473,;05.;,*/50*(3(5(3@:0:(5+
:;(2,/63+,9,5.(.,4,5;6<9;,(4>0334,,;>0;/:;(--;6-03;,976;,5;0(3:63<;065: " $($
%
$%"# $ $$)
#
$
<9.6(30:;6796=0+,9,*644,5+(;065:;/(;(9,
(*/0,=()3,56;653@-05(5*0(33@)<;7630;0*(33@(5+*<3;<9(33@(:>,33 &,-05+;/,),:;>(@;6+6
;/(;0:;6>69205;(5+,4>0;/:;(--;6<5+,9:;(5+;/,)96(+,9 -9(4,>692>0;/05>/0*/6<9 9,*644,5+(;065:4<:;>692
6336>05.(
0+ !961,*;",=0,>>0;/:;(-->,>03346=,-69>(9+
;6-05(30A,9,*644,5+(;065:
0;@.(;,6--,9:(++0;065(3),5,-0*0(3,3,4,5;::<*/(:(5690,5;(;0654,,;05.>0;/0;@3,(+,9:/07 +0:;90)<;0656-(!961,*; 90,5;(;06596*/<9,(;;/,050;0(320*2 6--4,,;05.(5++<905.6<965 :0;, =0:0;05$(:2(5+(
0+ !961,*;",=0,>;6+0:*<::050;0(3-0 5+05.:(5+9,*644,5+(;065:>0;/ ;/,0;@
(5(.,9::0:;(5;0;@
(5(.,9,7(9;4,5;,(+:(5+;/,(::0.5,+!961,*;
(5(.,9
$/,:,,3,4,5;:>033,5:<9,;/(;(3305;,95(3(5+,?;,95(3:;(2,/63+,9:/(=,;/,*/(5*,;67(9;0*07(;, 050;@.(;,F:9,=0,>05(*65:;9<*;0=,4(55,9>/0*/0:,::,5;0(3;6,5:<9,;/,7961,*;F::<**,::
!
69:04730*0;@>,/(=,69.(50A,+6<9(::,::4,5;-(*;69:05;6;/,-6336>05.)96(+;/,4,:
--0*0,5;(5+,--,*;0=,7630*,:,9=0*,::<7769;*65;05<,+,--69 ;:;69,+<*,*904,9,+<*,;/,-,(9 6-*904,9,:765+;6(33;@7,:6-7<)30*:(-,;@*(33:-69:,9=0*,(5+4(05;(05;/,/0./,:;3,=,3:6- *644<50;@ 7(9;5,9:/07: (5+ ,5.(.,4,5;
: :<*/ 0;@.(;,F: (::,::4,5; (5+ 790690;0A,+
9,*644,5+(;065:-69;/,!630*,,7(9;4,5;>033*3(::0-@)6;/04 4,+0(;,5,,+:(5+-<;<9, 403,:;65,:0+,5;0-@05.790690;0,:76;,5;0(3(3;,95(;0=,:(5+;/,*65:,8<,5*,:6-05(*;065 <9*6440;4,5;;6(*;0=,30:;,505.(5+*633()69(;065>0;/@6<9*644<50;@(336>:<:;6796=0+, 79(*;0*(3(5+0473,4,5;()3,9,*644,5+(;065:-69;/,,7(9;4,5; ;6;/90=,05;/,,=63=05. ,5=09654,5;6-7630*05.
'6<*(5;9<:;<:;67,9:65(33@4,,;>0 ;/@6<9:;(--+,=,367.,5<05, 9,3(;065:/07:(5+30:;,5>0;/;/,:7,*0-0*.6(36-3,(9505.56;653@>/(;;/,@+6)<;/6>;/,@+6 0;
$/,5C(-;,9+,=,36705.(:<--0*0,5;3@05-694,+-6<5+(;0656-256>3,+.,6-;/,,7(9;4,5;(5+ *6473,;05.(5(5(3@:0:6-+(;((5+(339,3,=(5;9,769;:796*,+ <9,:(5+79(*;0*,:C0;@.(;,>033 6--,99,*644,5+(;065:;/(;(9,0473,4,5;()3,(5+;(0369,+;6;/,,7(9;4,5;F:<508<,:0;<(;065
!
"$
"
%
;0;@.(;,>,:;965.3@=(3<,6<905+,7,5+,5*,(:>,),30,=,0;796=0+,:(:0.50-0*(5;),5,-0;;6 )6;/6<9(5(3@:,:(5+6<9*30,5;:
%#'"
$ %
$
) "$%
"#$
"##$$
"
*$
+
"
$
(
%#&
$
"
' "C>,(9,-9,,;6*/66:,
-964(=(90,;@6-76;,5;0(367;065:)(:,+65>/(;>033),46:;,--,*;0=,-69@6<9(.,5*@
$/,9,0:56D65, :0A, -0;: (33E-694<3(;6(++9,::7630*,(.,5*@:;(--05.<;030A(;065 +,736@4,5;7,9-694(5*,4,;90*:,;*
$/<:;6(**<9(;,3@(::,:: @6<9:7,*0-0*
(.,5*@(5+796=0+,*669+05(;,+),:;79(*;0*,:;(5+(9+:(5+9,*644,5+(;065:;/(; (9,(;;<5,+;6@6<9<508<,5,,+:>,<;030A,;/,0;@.(;, 7,9( ;065(3!630*05. #;9(;,.@ !#(5(3@:0:46+,3
'0 + "$*#1&,",),%6 64&'!&
'16% 1#!&,,0#0 #01-/ !1'!#0 +" #+!&* /(0$/,* * 1/'5,$ ,-1',+0 )(:,+65;/,36*(3*65;,?;*<3;<9,=(3<,:(5+:*(3,6-@6<9(.,5*@
(=05.(::,::,+@6<9*644<50;@F:<508<,36*(3*65;,?;(5+-(*; 7(;;,950;@.(;,>033*655,*; ;/,,7(9;4,5;F:7,9-694(5*,;64,;90*:(5+:;(5+(9+:-6<5+05 ;/,7<)30:/,+>6926-;/, 5;,95(;065(30;@
6<5;@
(5(.,4,5;::6*0(;065
;/,5 ;,95(;065(3::6*0(;0656-
/0,-:6-!630*,!;/,!630*,?,*<;0=,",:,(9*/69<4! ";/, (;065(3!630*05. 5:;0;<;, !;/, (;065(34,9.,5*@ <4),9::6*0(;065 ;/,::6*0(;0656-!<)30* #(-,;@ 644<50*(;065: --0*0(3: 5;,95(;065(3 ! ;/, 5;,95(;065(3 *(+,40,: 6- 4,9.,5*@0:7(;*/05.(5+6;/,9:;(5+(9+: :,;;05.69.(5 0A(;065:(5+*<;;05. ,+., :*/63(9:;6,5:<9,6<99,*644,5+(;065:),:;-0;@6<9:7,*0-0*7630*05.46+,3(5+5,,+:
" $
"!
%!!
<9*6479,/,5:0=,>692>033796=0+,(.<0+,;6;/,,7(9;4,5;-69;/,0;@F:*<99,5;(5+-<;<9, :,9=0*,+,30=,9@+,4(5+:
5(++0;065;6*65+<*;05.(+(;( +90= ,5(::,::4,5;6--0,3+:,9=0*,: +,736@4,5;0;@.(;,F:9,=0,>>03305*69769(;,9,3,=(5;4,(:<9 ()3,,7(9;4,5;(5+0;@+(;( (5+>033+,305,(;,6<9(5(3@:0:6-;/,,7(9;4,5;F:*(7(*0;@;6 796=0+,;/,/0./,:;3,=,36-3(> ,5-69*,4,5;:,9=0*,:76::0)3,>0;/05;/,*65;,?;6-;/,0;@F:9,:6<9*,:(5+05-9(:;9<*;<9,
0;@.(;,<;030A,:
0*96:6-;!6>,9(:(5(5(3@:0:;663(5+6<9;9(05,+:;(;0:;0*0(5:796=0+,36*(3 .6=,954,5;(.,5*0,:>0;//0:;690*(3(5+<7 ;6 +(;,(5(3@;0*:9,3(;,+;6647<;,9 0+,+0:7(;*/ +(;( ;6 ),;;,9 <5+,9:;(5+ ;/, 9,:765:, ;04, 4(5(.,4,5; +,736@4,5; (5+ .,6.9(7/0*(3 05-694(;0659,3(;,+;6(5(.,5*@
69;/0:9,=0,>65,,?(473,6-0;@.(;,F:+(;((5(3@:0:>03305*3<+,;/,<:,6-!6>,9;6(5(3@A, ;/,D(=,9(.,*6440;;,+;04,7,9/6<9E(5+D(=,9(.,!(;963<50;:*6440;;,+E;6+,;,9405,(7,9 /6<921')'7 1',+/ 1#-6979,+0*;0=,7<976:,:
"
&
%$
#$
;/0:4,(5:6-(5(3@:0:
,5()3,:0;@.(;,;6:04<3(;,;/,047(*;;6*/(5.,:057,9:655,3;6+,465:;9(;,76;,5;0(3*/(5.,: 05>69236(+<;030A(;065(5+>/,9,;/,46:;76:0;0=,9,:<3;:*(5),,?7,*;,+ 0;@.(;,(7730,:;/0: