Alternatives Evaluated
The EIR analyzed the No Project Alternative, which would avoid both the adverse and beneficial effects of the Project but would not meet the Project’s objectives. As the proposed Project would not result in any significant environmental impacts, no alternative development scenarios were evaluated. and a Reduced Project Alternative. The Reduced Project Alternative consists of decreasing the size of the proposed project. The EIR determined that the Reduced Project Alternative would be the environmentally superior alternative, although it would not fully meet the project’s objectives.
Lombardi Development Project | Final EIR
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 48 Chapter 3 – Environmental Setting, Impacts & Mitigation
Table 9: Health Risks from Project Construction at the Maximally Exposed Sensitive Receptor (Unmitigated)
Health Impact Metric
Carcinogenic
Inhalation Health Risk in
One Million
Chronic Inhalation
Hazard Index
Risks and Hazards at the maximally exposed sensitive receptor1 Risks and Hazards: Infant 25.6 0.016
Risks and Hazards: Child 4.03
5.25 0.016
Risks and Hazards: Adult 0.61 0.016
Threshold 20 1
Exceeds Threshold? Yes No
Notes:
1 The maximally exposed sensitive receptor is located at an existing residence located approximately 100 feet west of the project site. 2 Chronic non-cancer hazard index was estimated by dividing the annual DPM concentration (as PM2.5 exhaust) by the REL of 5 µg/m3.
Source: Appendix B.
Table 10: Health Risks from Project Construction at the Maximally Exposed Sensitive Receptor (Mitigated)
Health Impact Metric
Carcinogenic
Inhalation Health Risk in
One Million
Chronic Inhalation
Hazard Index
Risks and Hazards at the maximally exposed sensitive receptor1 Risks and Hazards: Infant 3.63 0.002
Risks and Hazards: Child 0.57
0.75 0.002
Risks and Hazards: Adult 0.08
0.09 0.002
Threshold 20 1
Exceeds Threshold? No No
Notes:
1 The maximally exposed sensitive receptor is located at an existing residence located approximately 100 feet west of the project site. 2 Chronic non-cancer hazard index was estimated by dividing the annual DPM concentration (as PM2.5 exhaust) by the REL of 5 µg/m3.
Source: Appendix B.
Lombardi Development Project | Final EIR
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 49 CHAPTER FOUR – Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program
CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines require that a public agency adopts a monitoring program for mitigation measures that have been incorporated into the approved project to reduce or avoid significant effects on the environment. The purpose of the monitoring program is to ensure compliance with environmental mitigation during project implementation and operation. Since there are potentially significant impacts requiring mitigation associated with the project, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is included herein on the following pages.
The first column of the Table identifies the mitigation measure. The second column, entitled “Party Responsible for Implementing Mitigation,” names the party responsible for carrying out the required action. The third column, “Implementation Timing,” identifies the time the mitigation measure should be initiated. The fourth column, “Party Responsible for Monitoring,” names the party ultimately responsible for ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented.
The last column will be used by the City to ensure that individual mitigation measures have been monitored.
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible
for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
AIR-1: Clean Construction Fleet. The Project Applicant and/or their respective contractors shall submit documentation to the City of Porterville demonstrating that all off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower meets EPA or ARB Tier 5 off-road emission standards.
Project
Applicant /
Construction
Contractor
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
IS-BIO-1: Within 30 days prior to ground disturbance activities associated with construction or grading that would occur during the nesting/breeding season of native bird species potentially nesting on the site (typically March through August in the project region, or as determined by a qualified biologist), the applicant shall have weekly surveys conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if active nests of bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and/or the California Fish and Game Code are present in the disturbance zone or within 300 feet (500 feet for raptors and special-status species) of the disturbance zone. The surveys shall continue on a weekly basis with the last survey being conducted no more than seven days prior to initiation of disturbance work. If ground disturbance activities are delayed, then additional pre-disturbance surveys shall be conducted such that no more than seven days will have elapsed between the survey and ground disturbance activities. If active nests are found, clearing and construction within 300 feet of the nest (500 feet for raptors and specialstatus species) shall be postponed or halted, at the discretion of the biologist, until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, as determined by the biologist, and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Limits of construction to avoid an active nest shall be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers and construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas. The biologist shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities will occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur. Results Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible
for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
of the surveys shall be provided to CDFG in the Annual Mitigation Status Report.
BIO-1: A qualified wildlife biologist shall conduct surveys for nesting SWHA following the entire survey methodology developed by the SWHA Technical Advisory Committee prior to Project implementation within 0.5- miles from the limits of Project-associated disturbance.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
BIO-2: If Project-specific activities take place during the SWHA nesting season (March 1 through September 15), and active SWHA nests are present, a minimum 0.5-mile no-disturbance buffer should be delineated and maintained around each nest, regardless if when it was detected by surveys or incidentally, until the breeding season has ended or until a qualified biologist has determined that the birds have fledged and are no longer reliant upon the nest or parental care for survival, to prevent nest abandonment and unauthorized take of SWHA as a result of Project activities.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
BIO-3: In the event an active SWHA nest is detected, and a 0.5-mile nodisturbance buffer is not feasible, consultation with CDFW shall occur to discuss how to implement the project and avoid take. If take cannot be avoided, take authorization through the acquisition of an Incidental Take Permit (ITP), pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 2081 subdivision (b) is necessary to comply with CESA.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible
for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
BIO-4: The removal of known SWHA nest trees, even outside of the nesting season shall be replaced with an appropriate native tree species planting at a ratio of 3:1 at or near the Project area or in another area that will be protected in perpetuity.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
BIO-5: Project activities should be timed to avoid the normal bird breeding season (February 1 through September 15). However, if Project activities must take place during that time, a qualified wildlife biologist shall conduct surveys for nesting TRBL no more than 10 days prior to the start of implementation to evaluate presence/absence of TRBL nesting colonies in proximity to Project activities and to evaluate potential Project-related impacts.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
BIO-6: If an active TRBL nesting colony is found during preconstruction surveys, a minimum 300-foot no-disturbance buffer in accordance with CDFW’s “Staff Guidance Regarding Avoidance of Impacts to Tricolored Blackbird Breeding Colonies on Agriculture Fields in 2015” shall be implemented. This buffer shall remain in place until the breeding season has ended or until a qualified biologist has determined that nesting has ceased, the birds have fledged, and are no longer reliant upon the colony or parental care for survival. It is important to note that TRBL colonies can expand over time and for this reason, the colony shall be reassessed to determine the extent of the breeding colony within 10 days for Project initiation.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible
for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
BIO-7: If a TRBL nesting colony is detected during surveys, consultation with CDFW shall occur to discuss how to implement the Project and avoid take, or if avoidance is not feasible, to acquire an ITP, pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 2081 subdivision (b), prior to any grounddisturbing activities.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
BIO-8: If small mammal burrows are present within the Project site, a qualified biologist shall conduct surveys to assess presence/absence following the California Burrowing Owl Consortium’s “Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines” and CDFW’s “Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation” (CDFG 2012). Specifically, if suitable habitat is present at an individual Project site, three or more surveillance surveys shall be conducted during daylight with each visit occurring at least three weeks apart during the peak breeding season (April 15 to July 15), when BUOW are most detectable.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible
for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
BIO-9: No-disturbance buffers, as outlined in the “Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation” (CDFG 2012), shall be implemented prior to and during any ground-disturbing activities. Specifically, impacts to occupied burrows shall be avoided in accordance with the following table unless a qualified biologist approved by CDFW verifies through non-invasive methods that either: 1) the birds have not begun egg laying and incubation; or 2) that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
BIO-10: If BUOW are found within these recommended buffers and avoidance is not possible, burrow exclusion shall be conducted by qualified biologists and only during the non-breeding season, before breeding behavior is exhibited and after the burrow is confirmed empty through non-invasive methods, such as surveillance. Replacement of occupied burrows shall happen with artificial burrows at a ratio of 1 burrow collapsed to 1 artificial burrow constructed (1:1) as mitigation for the potentially significant impact of evicting BUOW. BUOW may attempt to colonize or re-colonize an area that will be impacted; thus, ongoing surveillance shall occur, at a rate that is sufficient to detect BUOW if they return and determined by a qualified biologist.
Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant /
City of
Porterville
CUL-1:
• Before initiation of construction or ground-disturbing activities associated with the Project, the City shall require all construction Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible
for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
personnel to be alerted to the possibility of buried cultural resources, including historic, archeological and paleontological resources; • The general contractor and its supervisory staff shall be responsible for monitoring the construction Project for disturbance of cultural resources; and
• If a potentially significant historical, archaeological, or paleontological resource, such as structural features, unusual amounts of bone or shell, artifacts, human remains, or architectural remains or trash deposits are encountered during subsurface construction activities (i.e., trenching, grading), all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the identified potential resource shall cease until a qualified archaeologist evaluates the item for its significance and records the item on the appropriate State Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms. The archaeologist shall determine whether the item requires further study. If, after the qualified archaeologist conducts appropriate technical analyses, the item is determined to be significant under California Environmental Quality Act, the archaeologist shall recommend feasible mitigation measures, which may include avoidance, preservation in place or other appropriate measure, as outlined in Public Resources Code section 21083.2. The City of Porterville shall implement said measures.
CUL-2: The Project applicant will incorporate into the construction contract(s) a provision that in the event a fossil or fossil formations are discovered during any subsurface construction activities for the proposed Project (i.e., trenching, grading), all excavations within 100 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted until the find is examined by a qualified paleontologist, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate representative Project
Applicant
Prior to and
during
construction
Project
Applicant
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible
for
Implementing
Mitigation
Implementation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
at the City of Porterville, who shall coordinate with the paleontologist as to any necessary investigation of the find. If the find is determined to be significant under CEQA, the City shall implement those measures, which may include avoidance, preservation in place, or other appropriate measures, as outlined in Public Resources Code section 21083.2.
TRA-1: The Applicant shall pay the City of Porterville for their Fair Share Portion of the intersection and roadway segment improvements described in Tables 27 and 28, in order to maintain or improve the operational level of service of the street system in the project vicinity.
Project
Applicant
During project
design and
construction
Project
Applicant
TRA-2: The project developer shall pay a total of $50,260 in improvement fees, prior to issuance of building permits, to the City of Porterville to improve the existing bus stop at Westfield Avenue and Lombardi Street.
Project
Applicant
During project
design and
construction
Project
Applicant
Appendix A
Traffic Addendum Letter
5HVLGHQWLDO 'HYHOR
S
PHQW
:HVWZ
R
R
G
6W
:HVWILHOG
$YH
;IWX¦IPH %ZI
1 EXXL
I
[
7X
,IRHIVWSR %ZI
2 I
[
G
S
Q
F
7X
4VS
W
T
I
GX 7X
;
I
WX[
S
S
H
7X
0 S
Q
F
EVHM 7X
4VSNIGX
7MXI
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
1ET HEXE k +SSKPI
7UDIILF 6WX
G
\
352-(&7 3($. +285 75$)),&
),*85(
1 127 72 6&$/(
/(*(1'
678'< ,17(56(&7,21
5HVLGHQWLDO 'HYHORSPHQW
:HVWZRRG 6W :HVWILHOG $YH
;IWX¦IPH%ZI
1EXXLI[ 7X
,IRHIVWSR%ZI
2I[GSQF 7X
4VSWTIGX 7X
;IWX[SSH 7X
0SQFEVHM 7X
4VSNIGX
7MXI
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
1ETHEXEk+SSKPI
7UDIILF 6WXG\
3($.+28575$)),&
),*85(
1 127726&$/(
/(*(1'
678'<,17(56(&7,21
5HVLGHQWLDO 'HYHOR
S
PHQW
:HVWZ
R
R
G
6W
:HVWILHOG
$YH
;IWX¦IPH %ZI
1 EXXL
I
[
7X
,IRHIVWSR %ZI
2 I
[
G
S
Q
F
7X
4VS
W
T
I
GX 7X
;
I
WX[
S
S
H
7X
0 S
Q
F
EVHM 7X
4VSNIGX
7MXI
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
1ET HEXE k +SSKPI
7UDIILF 6WX
G
\
352-(&7 3($. +285 75$)),&
),*85(
1 127 72 6&$/(
/(*(1'
678'< ,17(56(&7,21
:HVWZRRG6W :HVWILHOG$YH
5HVLGHQWLDO'HYHORSPHQW
;IWX¦IPH%ZI
1EXXLI[7X
,IRHIVWSR%ZI
2I[GSQF7X
4VSWTIGX7X
;IWX[SSH7X
0SQFEVHM7X
4VSNIGX
7MXI
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
1ETHEXEk+SSKPI
7UDIILF6WXG\
3($.+28575$)),&
),*85(
1 127726&$/(
/(*(1'
678'<,17(56(&7,21
:HVWZRRG6W :HVWILHOG$YH
5HVLGHQWLDO'HYHORSPHQW
;IWX¦IPH%ZI
1EXXLI[7X
,IRHIVWSR%ZI
2I[GSQF7X
4VSWTIGX7X
;IWX[SSH7X
0SQFEVHM7X
4VSNIGX
7MXI
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
30
$0
1ETHEXEk+SSKPI
7UDIILF6WXG\
352-(&73($.+28575$)),&
),*85(
1 127726&$/(
/(*(1'
678'<,17(56(&7,21
Appendix A
NOP/Initial Study
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING REGARDING PROPOSED LOMBARDI
SUBDIVISION PROJECT
TO: Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies, other interested agencies, and members of the public
FROM: City of Porterville, Community Development Department SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) DATE: July 10, 2021 to August 9, 2021
The City of Porterville (City) will be the Lead Agency and will have an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map described below. The City has hired a consultant to prepare the EIR for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City will consider the EIR and its actions on the Project at a later date to be determined and announced.
Your participation as a responsible/trustee agency/cooperating agency or interested person is requested in the preparation and review of the Draft EIR. We are seeking your views at this time regarding the scope and content of the environmental information that is relevant to you or your agency’s statutory responsibilities.
The Project may require actions or approvals by other agencies. Please inform us of any applicable permit(s) and environmental requirements of your agency with respect to the Project. Your agency may need to use the EIR when considering your permit or other approval for the Project.
Project Title: Lombardi Subdivision
Project Applicant: San Joaquin Valley Homes
5607 Avenida de los Robles
Visalia, California 93291
Project Location: The Project site is located between N. Westwood Street and N.
Lombardi Street, bounded to the south by W. Westfield Avenue, in Porterville.
Project Description: The Project consists of an Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the construction of up to 233 single-family residential units on 56 acres and the annexation of the Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus, totaling approximately 69.65 acres.
Potential Environmental Effects: Potentially significant effects may result to various environmental categories including, but not
limited to Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions,
Energy, and Transportation.
The associated maps are available for public review via e-mail (see contact information below).
Document Availability and Public Review Timeline: Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response to the NOP must be sent no later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. The review period for the NOP will be from July 10, 2021 to August 9, 2021. A copy of the NOP can be requested at City Hall, 291 N Main St. or be obtained through the City’s website or by email via the email address below.
Written Comments: Comments in response to the Notice of Preparation will be accepted through 5:00 P.M., August 9, 2021. Please send your written comments to:
Jason Ridenour
Community Development Director
291 N. Main Street.
Porterville CA, 93257
Phone: (559) 782-7460
Email: [email protected]
All written comments should reference the Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Rezone and the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, Lombardi Subdivision Environmental Impact Report.
Please include your name, address, and phone number, and/or email so that we may contact you for clarification, if necessary.
Persons with questions or requests for information may call the Planning Department at (559) 782-7460 or by email at [email protected]
Public Scoping Meeting: The CEQA process encourages comments and questions from the public throughout the planning process. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15083, a Public Scoping Meeting will be held to solicit comments on the scope and content of the EIR. The meeting will be held in person at the Porterville City Hall Council Chambers and online through Zoom. The meeting information is listed below:
Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2021
Time: 5:30 P.M. to 6:30 P.M.
Location: Porterville City Hall, Council Chambers at 291 N. Main St. Porterville, CA 93257 Zoom Link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85241451080?pwd=UGZFdDdRazFyMmhrd1BDU0MrNkVDQT09 Or by Phone: (669) 900-9128 or (253) 215-8782
Webinar ID: 852 4145 1080
Passcode: 345026
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbdE55So59 Newspaper Notice of Preparation Published: The Porterville Recorder, July 10, 2021.
Agencies:
Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
District 6 Office
1352 W. Olive Ave
P.O. BOX 12616
Fresno, CA 93778-2616
Bureau of Reclamation
Michael P. Jackson, P.E., Area Manager
South-Central California Area Office
1243 N Street
Fresno CA 93727
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
Southern Region
34946 Flyover Ct
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Department of Water Resources
P.O. Box 942836
Sacramento, CA 94236-0001
Department of Fish and Wildlife
P.O. Box 944209
Sacramento, CA 94244-2090
Department of Conservation
801 K Street, MS 14-15
Sacramento, CA 95814
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
Lombardi Development Project Initial Study
Prepared for:
City of Porterville
291 N. Main Street
Porterville, CA 93257
(559) 782-7460
Contact: Jason Ridenour
Prepared by:
Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 302
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 840-4414
Contact: Emily Bowen, LEED AP
July 2021
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT INFORMATION.................................................................................................4 Project title.........................................................................................................................4 Lead agency name and address .....................................................................................4 Contact person and phone number...............................................................................4 Project location .................................................................................................................4 Project sponsor’s name/address.....................................................................................7 General plan designation................................................................................................7 Zoning ...............................................................................................................................7 Project Description...........................................................................................................7 Surrounding Land Uses/Existing Conditions ..............................................................8 Other Public Agencies Involved ..................................................................................10 Tribal Consultation........................................................................................................10 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED...................................11 DETERMINATION.............................................................................................................11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST...................................................................................13 I. AESTHETICS...............................................................................................................13 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES......................................................19 III. AIR QUALITY........................................................................................................23 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES...................................................................................29 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES ......................................................................................39 VI. ENERGY...................................................................................................................45 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.........................................................................................49 Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS......................................................................56 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ..................................................59 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .............................................................65 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING .............................................................................74 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES........................................................................................78 XIII. NOISE .....................................................................................................................80 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING........................................................................85 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES.................................................................................................88 XVI. RECREATION .......................................................................................................92 XVII. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC.........................................................................94 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.................................................................97 XX. WILDFIRE..............................................................................................................108 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ..........................................110 LIST OF PREPARERS.......................................................................................................112 Persons and Agencies Consulted...............................................................................112 Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 4
PROJECT INFORMATION
This document is the Initial Study on the potential environmental effects of the City of Porterville’s (City) Lombardi Development Project (Project). The City of Porterville will act as the Lead Agency for this project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. Copies of all materials referenced in this report are available for review in the project file during regular business hours at 291 N. Main Street, Porterville, CA 93257.
Project title
Lombardi Development Project
Lead agency name and address
City of Porterville
291 N. Main Street
Porterville, CA 93257
Contact person and phone number
Jason Ridenour, Interim Community Development Director
City of Porterville (559) 782-7460
Project location
The City of Porterville is located in Tulare County in the southern part of the San Joaquin Valley.
The 56-acre Project site is located in northwest Porterville, bounded to the west by N. Westwood Street, to the south by W. Westfield Avenue, and to the east by N. Lombardi Street. Residential subdivisions lie to the west, east, and south. Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus lies directly north, with a diagonal of the Friant-Kern Canal along the northwest corner. See Figure 1.
Porterville is bisected north-south by State Route (SR) 65 and SR 190 runs east-west in the southern portion of the City.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 5 Figure 1 – Location
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 6 Figure 2 – Site Aerial
Annexation Area
Development Area
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 7 Project sponsor’s name/address
San Joaquin Valley Homes
5607 Ave de Las Robles
Visalia, CA 93291
General plan designation
Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Parks and Recreation, and Neighborhood Commercial.
Zoning
RS-1
Project Description
The proposed Project consists of an Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Rezone and a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the construction of up to 233 single-family residential units. Parcels to be annexed include 245-010-087, -092, -037 and -041 for a total of approximately 69.65 acres. The 56-acre subdivision would be developed on Assessor Parcel Number 245-010-087. The Project site is located between N. Westwood Street and N. Lombardi Street, bounded tothe south by W. Westfield Avenue.
Project Components
• Construction of 233 single family residential units.
• Development of a 152,217 square foot park in the center of the residential development. • Construction of local roads with five points of ingress/egress; one on the southern boundary of the property off W. Westfield Avenue, one on the western boundary off N.
Westwood Street, one on the northern boundary off an unnamed street adjacent to the Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus, and two on the eastern boundary off N.
Lombardi Street.
• Improvement of all streets in or adjacent to the subdivision, in accordance with the approved improvements plan, per Section 407.02(h) of the Porterville Development Ordinance.
• Development of a subdivision tree and landscaping design that will be approved by the City. At least one tree will be planted on each residential lot and street trees will be planted at 35 feet on center along all parkways within and/or bordering the subdivision. • Development of a Landscape plan, in accordance with Chapter 303 of the Porterville Development Ordinance.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 8 • Change the zone on APN 245-010-087 from the prezoned RS-1 to RS-2 (Very Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential).
• Annexation of APN 245-010-087 (56.32 acres), -041 (1.00 acre), -037 (1.06 acres) and -092 (11.27 acres). Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus, is on APN 245-010-087, and rural houses are on -037 and -041. The only physical changes proposed with this Project will occur on APN 245-010-087.
• Cancellation of Williamson Act contract Number 05126 and disestablishment of Ag Preserve 2034
Project Operations
Upon Annexation, General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation, and Rezone, the proposed Project would be in be within City Limits and compliant with land use requirements. Water, sewage disposal and refuse collection services will be provided by the City of Portville and the applicant will be required to tie into the City’s existing facilities. The proposed Project would require gas, telephone, cable, and electrical improvements. Natural gas would be provided by The Gas Company; telephone services would be provided by AT&T; electric power would be provided by Southern California Edison Company; and cable television would be provided by Charter Communication. The extent of work required for utilities and gas would be determined during final project design.
Surrounding Land Uses/Existing Conditions
The proposed Project site is currently in use with primarily agricultural activities. Two rural residences associated with the agricultural activities reside in the Project area; one along W.
Westfield Avenue and one along N. Lombardi Street. Both residences are adjacent to vacant areas utilized for storage and staging heavy equipment.
Lands directly surrounding the proposed Project are described as follows:
• North: Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus and a portion of the Friant-Kern Canal, identified as Public Land and Park Land.
• South: Residential development and vacant land, identified as Low Density and Medium Density Residential.
• East: Residential development, vacant land and agriculture, identified as Very Low and Low Density Residential.
• West: Residential development, identified as Low Density Residential.
The area lies within a Residential Neighborhood (RN) District, as per the City of Porterville Final Zoning Map (effective January 19, 2012).
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 9 Figure 3 – Site Plan
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 10 Other Public Agencies Involved
• Approval of Williamson Act Cancellation by Tulare County Board of Supervisors.
• Annexation approval by Tulare County LAFCo.
• Approval of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
• Dust Control Plan Approval letter from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.
• Compliance with other federal, state and local requirements.
Tribal Consultation
The City of Porterville has not received any project-specific requests from any Tribes in the geographic area with which it is traditionally and culturally affiliated with or otherwise to be notified about projects in the City of Porterville.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 11
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture Resources
and Forest Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards &
Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water
Quality
Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population / Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities / Service
Systems
Wildfire Mandatory
Findings of
Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 13
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I. AESTHETICS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within
a state scenic highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that
are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage point). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and regulations
governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located on the San Joaquin Valley floor in the southern portion of the City of Porterville, California. Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus lies to the north of the site, with a portion of the Friant-Kern Canal running diagonally along the northwest corner. The site is bounded to the east by N. Lombardi Street, with residential development, vacant land and agriculture beyond the roadway. The site is bounded to the south by W. Westfield Avenue, with residential development and vacant land beyond the roadway. The site is bounded by N. Westwood Street to the west, with residential development beyond the roadway in that direction. The aesthetic features of the existing visual Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 14 environment in the proposed Project area are residential and agricultural. There are no scenic resources or scenic vistas in the area. State Routes (SR) in the proposed Project vicinity include 99, 65, 190, 137.
Regulatory Setting
Federal
Aesthetic resources are protected by several federal regulations, none of which are relevant to the proposed Project because it will not be located on lands administered by a federal agency, and the proposed Project applicant is not requesting federal funding or a federal permit.
State
Nighttime Sky – Title 24 Outdoor Lighting Standards
The Energy Commission adopted changes to Title 24, Parts 1 and 6, Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Standards), on April 23, 2008. These new Standards became effective on January 1, 2010.
Requirements for outdoor lighting remained consistent with past Standards and the requirements vary according to which “Lighting Zone” the equipment is in. The Standards contain lighting power allowances for newly installed equipment and specific alterations that are dependent on which Lighting Zone the Project is located in. Existing outdoor lighting systems are not required to meet these lighting power allowances. However, alterations that increase the connected load, or replace more than 50% of the existing luminaires, for each outdoor lighting application that is regulated by the Standards, must meet the lighting power allowances for newly installed equipment.
An important part of the Standards is to base the lighting power that is allowed on how bright the surrounding conditions are. The eyes adapt to darker surrounding conditions, and less light is needed to properly see; when the surrounding conditions get brighter, more light is needed to see.
The least power is allowed in Lighting Zone 1 and increasingly more power is allowed in Lighting Zones 2, 3, and 4.
The Energy Commission defines the boundaries of Lighting Zones based on U.S. Census Bureau boundaries for urban and rural areas as well as the legal boundaries of wilderness and park areas.
By default, government designated parks, recreation areas and wildlife preserves are Lighting Zone 1; rural areas are Lighting Zone 2; and urban areas are Lighting Zone 3. Lighting Zone 4 is a special use district that may be adopted by a local government.
California Scenic Highway Program
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 15 The Scenic Highway Program allows county and city governments to apply to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to establish a scenic corridor protection program which was created by the Legislature in 1963. Its purpose is to protect and enhance the natural scenic beauty of California highways and adjacent corridors, through special conservation treatment. The state laws governing the Scenic Highway Program are found in the Streets and Highways Code, Sections 260 through 263. While not Designated State Scenic Highways, two Eligible State Scenic Highways occur in Tulare County, SR 198 and SR 190.
Local
Porterville General Plan Policies
• LU-I-14: Allow residential developments to employ creative site design, landscaping, and architectural quality that blend with the characteristics of each location and its surroundings and offer superior design solutions.
• LU-I-18: Protect existing residential neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities and land uses, and environmental hazards.
• L-I-20: Establish standards for pedestrian-oriented design in neighborhood centers. Pedestrian orientation design standards may include, but would not be limited to:
Limitations on maximum block length
Minimum sidewalk width
Required streetscape improvements, including street trees Building height and articulation
Building setbacks
Location of entries
Parking location and required landscaping
• LU-I-25: Establish buffering requirements and performance standards intended to minimize harmful effects of excessive noise, light, glare, and other adverse environmental impacts.
RESPONSES
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 16 Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project includes the construction of up to 233 single-family residences and the improvements associated with a new residential development, including lighting and site landscaping. The structures will conform to design standards set forth by the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed Project site is located in an area that is substantially surrounded by urban uses and will not result in a use that is visually incompatible with the surrounding area.
The City of Porterville General Plan does not identify any scenic vistas within the proposed Project area.
A scenic vista is generally considered a view of an area that has remarkable scenery or a resource that is indigenous to the area. The Project is located in an area of minimal topographic relief, and views of the site are easily obscured by buildings, other structures and trees. Neither the Project area nor any surrounding land use contains features typically associated with scenic vistas (e.g., ridgelines, peaks, overlooks).
Construction activities will be visible from the adjacent roadsides; however, the construction activities will be temporary in nature and will not affect a scenic vista. The impact will be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
Less than Significant Impact. There are no state designated scenic highways within the immediate proximity to the Project site. California Department of Transportation Scenic Highway Mapping System identifies SR 190 east of SR 65 as an Eligible State Scenic Highway. This is the closest highway, located approximately 3.1 miles southeast of the Project site; however, the Project site is both physically and visually separated from SR 190 by intervening land uses. In addition, no scenic highways or roadways are listed within the Project area in the City of Porterville’s General Plan or Tulare County’s General Plan.
Based on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the City’s General Plan, no historic buildings exist on the Project site. The proposed Project would not cause damage to rock outcroppings or historic buildings within a State scenic highway corridor. Any impacts would be considered less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 17 vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and regulations governing scenic quality?
Less than Significant Impact. Site construction will include residences, internal access roads, lighting and site landscaping. The residences will be single-family and will conform to design standards set forth by the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, upon Annexation and pending approval. The proposed Project site is located in an area that is substantially surrounded by urban uses, including residential and agricultural, and as such, will not result in a use that is visually incompatible with the surrounding area. The proposed Project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the area or its surroundings.
The impact will be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less Than Significant Impact. Nighttime lighting is necessary to provide and maintain safe, secure, and attractive environments; however, these lights have the potential to produce spillover light and glare and waste energy, and if designed incorrectly, could be considered unattractive. Light that falls beyond the intended area is referred to as “light trespass.” Types of light trespass include spillover light and glare.
Minimizing all these forms of obtrusive light is an important environmental consideration. A less obtrusive and well-designed energy efficient fixture would face downward, emit the correct intensity of light for the use, and incorporate energy timers.
Spillover light is light emitted by a lighting installation that falls outside the boundaries of the property on which the installation is sited. Spillover light can adversely affect light-sensitive uses, such as residential neighborhoods at nighttime. Because light dissipates as it travels from the source, the intensity of a light fixture is often increased at the source to compensate for the dissipated light. This can further increase the amount of light that illuminates adjacent uses. Spillover light can be minimized by using only the level of light necessary, and by using cutoff type fixtures or shielded light fixtures, or a combination of fixture types.
Glare results when a light source directly in the field of vision is brighter than the eye can comfortably accept. Squinting or turning away from a light source is an indication of glare. The presence of a bright light in an otherwise dark setting may be distracting or annoying, referred to as discomfort glare, or it may diminish the ability to see other objects in the darkened environment, referred to as disability glare.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 18 Glare can be reduced by design features that block direct line of sight to the light source and that direct light downward, with little or no light emitted at high (near horizontal) angles, since this light would travel long distances. Cutoff-type light fixtures minimize glare because they emit relatively low-intensity light at these angles.
Current sources of light in the Project area include street lights, light from the Summit Charter Academy parking area, the vehicles traveling along adjacent roadways, and light from nearby residences. The Project would necessitate street lighting. Such lighting would be subject to the requirements of the Porterville Development Ordinance 300.07, which ensures that outdoor lighting does not produce obtrusive glare onto the public right-of-way or adjoining properties. Accordingly, the Project would not create substantial new sources of light or glare. Potential impacts are less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 19 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST
RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production
(as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 20
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located in an area just outside of the City of Porterville planning area.
Approximately two-thirds of the property (the northern portion) is considered Farmland of Statewide Importance by the State Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, while approximately one-third (the southern portion) is considered Prime Farmland. A small south-north rectangle on the eastern boundary is considered Urban and Built-Up Land. The land is enrolled in Williamson Act contracts.
Regulatory Setting
Federal
Federal regulations for agriculture and forest resources are not relevant to the proposed Project because it is not a federal undertaking (the Project site is not located on lands administered by a federal agency, and the Project applicant is not requesting federal funding or a federal permit).
State
State regulations for agriculture and forest resources relevant to the proposed Project include the Williamson Act (1965), as the Project site is currently enrolled in a Williamson Act contract and will require cancellation upon Project development.
Local
Porterville General Plan Policies
Porterville General Plan Policies for agriculture and forest resources are not relevant to the proposed Project because the Project site is not currently within City Limits.
RESPONSES
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located outside the City of Porterville limits but within the Urban Development Boundary. The site is currently zoned RS-1 and designated as Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Parks & Recreation and Neighborhood Commercial. The proposed Project consists of an Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Rezone and a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the construction of up to 233 single-family residential units on approximately 56 acres of land. The site is designated as primarily Farmland of Statewide Importance and Prime Farmland, with a small south-north rectangle on the eastern boundary considered Urban and Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 21 Built-Up Land by the State Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. The site has been planned for development in the Porterville 2030 General Plan and as such, agricultural conversion impacts were analyzed in the Porterville 2030 General Plan EIR (SCH 2006011033). Agricultural conversion imacts were found to be significant and unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Conditions was adopted by Resolution. Since site agricultural conversion impacts were previously analyzed, there would be no new impacts as a result of Project implementation. Impacts are less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Less Than Significant Impact. The site is under Williamson Act contract number 5126 and agricultural preserve number 2034. As part of the proposed Project, the Williamson Act contract will be cancelled, and the Project developer will pay the 12.5% cancellation fees. As such, the proposed Project would not conflict with existing Williamson Act contracts and the impact is considered less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The Project is not zoned for forestland and does not propose any zone changes related to forest or timberland. There is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. No conversion of forestland, as defined under Public Resource Code or General Code, as referenced above, would occur as a result of the Project. There is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 22 e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Less Than Significant Impact. Agricultural conversion impacts in the City’s projected development areas were assessed in the Porterville 2030 General Plan EIR. Impacts were considered significant and unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted. Surrounding land uses include residential and agricultural, and the Project is not expected to involve land use changes to these surrounding areas. The proposed Project does not have the potential to result in the conversion of forestland uses to non-forestland. Any impacts are considered less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 23 III. AIR QUALITY
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d. Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors or adversely affecting a
substantial number of people)?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The climate of the San Joaquin Valley is characterized by long, hot summers and stagnant, foggy, winters.
Precipitation is low and temperature inversions are common. These characteristics are conducive to the formation and retention of air pollutants and are in part influenced by the surrounding mountains which intercept precipitation and act as a barrier to the passage of cold air and air pollutants.
The proposed Project lies within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, which is managed by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD or Air District). National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) have been established for the following criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), and lead (Pb). The CAAQS also set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, and visibility.
Air quality plans or attainment plans are used to bring the applicable air basin into attainment with all state and federal ambient air quality standards designed to protect the health and safety of residents within that air basin. Areas are classified under the Federal Clean Air Act as either “attainment”, “non-attainment”, or “extreme non-attainment” areas for each criteria pollutant based on whether the NAAQS have been achieved or not. Attainment relative to the State Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 24 standards is determined by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The San Joaquin Valley is designated as a State and Federal extreme non-attainment area for O3, a State and Federal non-attainment area for PM2.5, a State non-attainment area for PM10, and Federal and State attainment area for CO, SO2, NO2, and Pb.1
Regulatory Setting
Federal
Clean Air Act
The federal Clean Air Act of 1970 (as amended in 1990) required the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop standards for pollutants considered harmful to public health or the environment. Two types of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) were established.
Primary standards protect public health, while secondary standards protect public welfare, by including protection against decreased visibility, and damage to animals, crops, landscaping and vegetation, or buildings. NAAQS have been established for six “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), and lead (Pb).
State
California Air Resources Board
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is the state agency responsible for implementing the federal and state Clean Air Acts. CARB has established California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), which include all criteria pollutants established by the NAAQS, but with additional regulations for Visibility Reducing Particles, sulfates, hydrogen Sulfide (H2S), and vinyl chloride.
The proposed Project is located within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, which includes San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Kings, Tulare, and parts of Kern counties and is managed by the SJVAPCD.
Air basins are classified as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassified. Attainment is achieved when monitored ambient air quality data is in compliance with the standards for a specified pollutant.
Non-compliance with an established standard will result in a nonattainment designation and an 1 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Ambient Air Quality Standards & Valley Attainment Status. http://www.valleyair.org/aqinfo/attainment.htm. Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 25 unclassified designation indicates insufficient data is available to determine compliance for that pollutant.
Standards and attainment status for listed pollutants in the Air District can be found in Table 1. Note that both state and federal standards are presented.
Table 1
Standards and Attainment Status for Listed Pollutants in the Air District2 Federal Standard California Standard
Ozone 0.075 ppm (8-hr avg) 0.07 ppm (8-hr avg) 0.09 ppm (1- hr avg)
Carbon Monoxide 9.0 ppm (8-hr avg) 35.0 ppm
(1-hr avg)
9.0 ppm (8-hr avg) 20.0 ppm
(1-hr avg)
Nitrogen Dioxide 0.053 ppm (annual avg) 0.30 ppm (annual avg) 0.18 ppm (1-hr avg)
Sulfur Dioxide 0.03 ppm (annual avg) 0.14
ppm (24-hr avg) 0.5 ppm (3-hr
avg)
0.04 ppm (24-hr avg) 0.25
ppm (1hr avg)
Lead 1.5 µg/m3 (calendar quarter)
0.15 µg/m3 (rolling 3-month
avg)
1.5 µg/m3 (30-day avg)
Particulate Matter (PM10) 150 µg/m3 (24-hr avg) 20 µg/m3 (annual avg) 50 µg/m3 (24-hr avg)
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 15 µg/m3 (annual avg) 35 µg/m3 (24-hr avg) 12 µg/m3 (annual avg)
μg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Additional State regulations include:
CARB Portable Equipment Registration Program – This program was designed to allow owners and operators of portable engines and other common construction or farming equipment to register their equipment under a statewide program so they may operate it statewide without the need to obtain a permit from the local air district.
U.S. EPA/CARB Off-Road Mobile Sources Emission Reduction Program – The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) requires CARB to achieve a maximum degree of emissions reductions from off-road mobile sources to attain State Ambient Air Quality Standards (SAAQS); off- road mobile sources include most construction equipment. Tier 1 standards for large compression-ignition engines used in off-road mobile sources went into effect in California in 1996. These standards, along with ongoing rulemaking, address emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and toxic particulate matter from diesel engines. CARB is currently 2 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Ambient Air Quality Standards & Valley Attainment Status. http://www.valleyair.org/aqinfo/attainment.htm. Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 26 developing a control measure to reduce diesel PM and NOX emissions from existing off-road diesel equipment throughout the state.
California Global Warming Solutions Act – Established in 2006, Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) requires that California’s GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. This will be implemented through a statewide cap on GHG emissions, which will be phased in beginning in 2012. AB 32 requires CARB to develop regulations and a mandatory reporting system to monitor global warming emissions levels.
In addition, the proposed Project is being evaluated pursuant to CEQA.
Local
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) is the local agency charged with preparing, adopting, and implementing mobile, stationary, and area air emission control measures and standards. The SJVAPCD has several rules and regulations that may apply to the Project:
Rule 3135 (Dust Control Plan Fees) – This rule requires the project applicant to submit a fee in addition to a Dust Control Plan. The purpose of this rule is to recover the SJVAPCD’s cost for reviewing these plans and conducting compliance inspections.
Rules 4101 (Visible Emissions) and 4102 (Nuisance) – These rules apply to any source of air contaminants and prohibits the visible emissions of air contaminants or any activity which creates a public nuisance.
Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations) – This rule applies to use of asphalt for paving new roadways or restoring existing roadways disturbed by project activities.
Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions) – This regulation, a series of eight regulations, is designed to reduce PM10 emissions by reducing fugitive dust. Regulation VIII requires implementation of control measures to ensure that visible dust emissions are substantially reduced. The control measures are summarized in Table 2.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 27 Table 2
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
Regulation VIII Control Measures for Construction Related Emissions of PM103 The following are required to be implemented at all construction sites:
All disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not actively utilized for construction purposes, shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water, chemical stabilizers/suppressants, covered with a tarp or other similar cover, or vegetative All on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions during construction using water or chemical stabilizer All land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading cut and fill, and demolition activities during construction shall be effectively controlled of fugitive dust emissions utilizing application of water or pre-soaking.
When materials are transported off-site, all material shall be covered, or effectively wetted to limit visible dust emissions, and at least six inches of freeboard space from top of container shall be maintained.
All operations shall limit, or expeditiously remove the accumulation of mud or dirt from adjacent public streets at the end of each workday. The use of dry rotary brushes is expressly prohibited except where preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit the visible dust emissions. Use of Following the addition of materials to, or the removal of materials from, the surface of outdoor storage piles, said piles shall be effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions utilizing sufficient water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.
Within urban areas, trackout shall be immediately removed when it extends 50 or more feet from the site at the end of each workday.
Any site with 150 or more vehicle trips per day shall prevent carryout and trackout.
Porterville General Plan Policies
• OSC-G-9: Improve and protect Porterville’s air quality by making air quality a priority in land use and transportation planning and in development review. • OSC-I-59: Require preparation of a Health Risk Assessment for any development subject to the Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Act.
• OSC-I-61: Coordinate air quality planning efforts with other local, regional and State agencies.
• OSC-I-63: Notify local and regional jurisdictions of proposed projects that may affect regional air quality.
3 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Current District Rules and Regulations. http://www.valleyair.org/rules/1ruleslist.htm#reg8.
Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 28
RESPONSES
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Potentially Significant Impact. The San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB) is designated nonattainment of state and federal health-based air quality standards for ozone and PM2.5. The SJVAB is designated nonattainment of state PM10. To meet Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements, the SJVAPCD has multiple air quality attainment plan (AQAP) documents, including:
• Extreme Ozone Attainment Demonstration Plan (EOADP) for attainment of the 1-hour ozone standard (2004);
• 2007 Ozone Plan for attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard; • 2007 PM10 Maintenance Plan and Request for Redesignation; and • 2008 PM2.5 Plan.
Because of the region’s non-attainment status for ozone, PM2.5, and PM10, if the project-generated emissions of either of the ozone precursor pollutants (ROG or NOx), PM10, or PM2.5 were to exceed the SJVAPCD’s significance thresholds, then the project uses would be considered to conflict with the attainment plans. In addition, if the project uses were to result in a change in land use and corresponding increases in vehicle miles traveled, they may result in an increase in vehicle miles traveled that is unaccounted for in regional emissions inventories contained in regional air quality control plans.
Predicted construction and operational emissions may exceed the SJVAPCD’s significance thresholds for ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 , could potentially create a cumulatively considerable net increase of these pollutants, could potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and could result in other emissions. Therefore, this impact is potentially significant.
This topic will be addressed in the Project’s forthcoming EIR.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 29 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 30 e. Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located in a portion of the central San Joaquin Valley that has, for decades, experienced intensive agricultural and urban disturbances. Current agricultural endeavors in the region include orange groves, olive orchards and row crops.
Like most of California, the Central San Joaquin Valley experiences a Mediterranean climate. Warm dry summers are followed by cool moist winters. Summer temperatures usually exceed 90 degrees Fahrenheit, and the relative humidity is generally very low. Winter temperatures rarely raise much above 70 degrees Fahrenheit, with daytime highs often below 60 degrees Fahrenheit. Annual precipitation within the proposed Project site is about 10 inches, almost 85% of which falls between the months of October and March. Nearly all precipitation falls in the form of rain and storm-water readily infiltrates the soils of the surrounding the sites.
Native plant and animal species once abundant in the region have become locally extirpated or have experienced large reductions in their populations due to conversion of upland, riparian, and aquatic habitats to agricultural and urban uses. Remaining native habitats are particularly valuable to native wildlife species including special status species that still persist in the region.
The site currently consists of land primarily utilized for agricultural activities, with a single-family residence located on the southern boundary and another residence on the eastern boundary property.
Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus lies to the north of the site, with a portion of the FriantKern Canal running diagonally along the northwest corner. The site is bounded to the east by N.
Lombardi Street, with residential development, vacant land and agriculture beyond the roadway. The site is bounded to the south by W. Westfield Avenue, with residential development and vacant land beyond the roadway. The site is bounded by N. Westwood Street to the west, with residential development beyond the roadway in that direction. No aquatic or wetland features occur on the proposed Project site, therefore jurisdictional waters are considered absent from the site.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 31 Regulatory Setting
Federal
Endangered Species Act
The USFWS and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) enforce the provisions stipulated in the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (FESA, 16 United States Code [USC] § 1531 et seq.). Threatened and endangered species on the federal list (50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 17.11 and 17.12) are protected from take unless a Section 10 permit is granted to an entity other than a federal agency or a Biological Opinion with incidental take provisions is rendered to a federal lead agency via a Section 7 consultation. Take is defined as harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect or attempt to engage in any such conduct. Pursuant to the requirements of the FESA, an agency reviewing a proposed action within its jurisdiction must determine whether any federally listed species may be present in the proposed action area and determine whether the proposed action may affect such species. Under the FESA, habitat loss is considered an effect to a species. In addition, the agency is required to determine whether the proposed action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any species that is listed or proposed for listing under the FESA (16 USC § 1536[3], [4]). Therefore, proposed action-related effects to these species or their habitats would be considered significant and would require mitigation.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
The federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (16 USC § 703, Supp. I, 1989) prohibits killing, possessing, trading, or other forms of take of migratory birds except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior. “Take” is defined as the pursuing, hunting, shooting, capturing, collecting, or killing of birds, their nests, eggs, or young (16 USC § 703 and § 715n). This act encompasses whole birds, parts of birds, and bird nests and eggs. The MBTA specifically protects migratory bird nests from possession, sale, purchase, barter transport, import, and export, and take. For nests, the definition of take per 50 CFR 10.12 is to collect. The MBTA does not include a definition of an “active nest.” However, the “Migratory Bird Permit Memorandum” issued by the USFWS in 2003 clarifies the MBTA in that regard and states that the removal of nests, without eggs or birds, is legal under the MBTA, provided no possession (which is interpreted as holding the nest with the intent of retaining it) occurs during the destruction.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction
Areas meeting the regulatory definition of “waters of the United States” (jurisdictional waters) are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) under provisions of Section Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 32 404 of the Clean Water Act (1972) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (1899). These waters may include all waters used, or potentially used, for interstate commerce, including all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, all interstate waters, all other waters (intrastate lakes, rivers, streams, mudflats, sandflats, playa lakes, natural ponds, etc.), all impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States, tributaries of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States, the territorial seas, and wetlands adjacent to waters of the United States (33 CFR part 328.3). Ditches and drainage canals where water flows intermittently or ephemerally are not regulated as waters of the United States.
Wetlands on non-agricultural lands are identified using the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and related Regional Supplement.4,5 Construction activities, including direct removal, filling, hydrologic disruption, or other means in jurisdictional waters are regulated by the USACE. The placement of dredged or fill material into such waters must comply with permit requirements of the USACE. No USACE permit will be effective in the absence of state water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The State Water Resources Control Board is the state agency (together with the Regional Water Quality Control Boards) charged with implementing water quality certification in California.
State
California Endangered Species Act
The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) of 1970 (Fish and Game Code § 2050 et seq. and California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 14, Subsection 670.2, 670.51) prohibits the take of species listed under CESA (14 CCR Subsection 670.2, 670.5). Take is defined as hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill. Under CESA, state agencies are required to consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife when preparing CEQA documents. Consultation ensures that proposed projects or actions do not have a negative effect on state-listed species. During consultation, CDFW determines whether take would occur and identifies “reasonable and prudent alternatives” for the project and conservation of special-status species. CDFW can authorize take of statelisted species under Sections 2080.1 and 2081(b) of Fish and Game Code in those cases where it is demonstrated that the impacts are minimized and mitigated. Take authorized under section 2081(b) must be minimized and fully mitigated. A CESA permit must be obtained if a project will result in take 4 United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetland Research Program Technical Report Y-87-1.
5 United Sates Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2008. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0). ERDC/EL TR-08-28. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1046489.pdf.
Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 33 of listed species, either during construction or over the life of the project. Under CESA, CDFW is responsible for maintaining a list of threatened and endangered species designated under state law (Fish and Game Code § 2070). CDFW also maintains lists of species of special concern, which serve as “watch lists.” Pursuant to the requirements of CESA, a state or local agency reviewing a proposed project within its jurisdiction must determine whether the proposed project will have a potentially significant impact upon such species. Project-related impacts to species on the CESA list would be considered significant and would require mitigation. Impacts to species of concern or fully protected species would be considered significant under certain circumstances.
Native Plant Protection Act
The California Native Plant Protection Act of 1977 (California Fish and Game Code §§ 1900–1913) requires all state agencies to use their authority to carry out programs to conserve endangered and otherwise rare species of native plants. Provisions of the act prohibit the taking of listed plants from the wild and require the project proponent to notify CDFW at least 10 days in advance of any change in land use, which allows CDFW to salvage listed plants that would otherwise be destroyed.
Nesting Birds
California Fish and Game Code Subsections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 prohibit the possession, incidental take, or needless destruction of birds, their nests, and eggs. California Fish and Game Code Section 3511 lists birds that are “Fully Protected” as those that may not be taken or possessed except under specific permit.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Jurisdiction The CDFW has regulatory jurisdiction over lakes and streams in California. Activities that divert or obstruct the natural flow of a stream; substantially change its bed, channel, or bank; or use any materials (including vegetation) from the streambed, may require that the project applicant enter into a Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFW in accordance with California Fish and Game Code Section 1602.
California Environmental Quality Act
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (Subsections 21000–21178) requires that CDFW be consulted during the CEQA review process regarding impacts of proposed projects on specialstatus species. Special-status species are defined under CEQA Guidelines subsection 15380(b) and (d) as those listed under FESA and CESA and species that are not currently protected by statute or regulation but would be considered rare, threatened, or endangered under these criteria or by the scientific community. Therefore, species considered rare or endangered are addressed in this biological resource evaluation regardless of whether they are afforded protection through any other statute or regulation.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 34 The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) inventories the native flora of California and ranks species according to rarity.6 Plants with Rare Plant Ranks 1A, 1B, 2A, or 2B are considered special-status species under CEQA.
Although threatened and endangered species are protected by specific federal and state statutes, CEQA Guidelines Section 15380(d) provides that a species not listed on the federal or state list of protected species may be considered rare or endangered if it can be shown to meet certain specified criteria. These criteria have been modeled after the definition in the FESA and the section of the California Fish and Game Code dealing with rare and endangered plants and animals. Section 15380(d) allows a public agency to undertake a review to determine if a significant effect on species that have not yet been listed by either the USFWS or CDFW (i.e., candidate species) would occur. Thus, CEQA provides an agency with the ability to protect a species from the potential impacts of a project until the respective government agency has an opportunity to designate the species as protected, if warranted.
Local
Porterville General Plan Policies
• OSC-G-7: Protect habitat for special status species, designated under State and federal law.
RESPONSES
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is currently being utilized for agricultural activities.
Specifically, the parcel is planted in orchards. The site is highly disturbed. The only vegetation aside from the orchard trees are grasses and weedy vegetation growing between the rows.
According to the Porterville General Plan, several special status plant species are potentially found within the Porterville Planning Area. These species include Keck’s checkerbloom (Sidalcea keckii), 6 California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program (CNPS). 2019. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-03 0.39).
California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/ Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 35 Springville clarkia (Clarkia springvillensis), San Joaquin adobe sunburst (Pseudobahia peirsonii), Striped adobe-lily (Fritillaria striata), Madera leptosiphon (Leptosiphon serrulatus), Calico monkeyflower (Mimulus pictus), and Spiny-sepaled button celery (Eryngium spinosepalum). Additionally, the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle, which is a special status species, is supported by elderberry shrubs which are known to grown in several areas throughout the Planning Area.
The Planning Area also contains potential habitat for many special status species of animals. These species include California condor (Gymnogyps californianus), San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica), the previously mentioned Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus), Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi), American badger (Taxidea taxus), Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), Western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus), Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias), Western pond turtle (Emys marmorata), Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), Morrison’s blister beetle (Lytta morrisoni), and Molestan blister beetle (Lytta molesta).
However, according to the Special Status Species and Vegetation map (Figure 6-4) found in the Porterville General Plan’s Open Space and Conservation Element, the proposed Project area does not support any of the aforementioned special status species. This is due to either lack of habitat within the Project area, the Project is outside the current range of the species, or the presence of disturbance would otherwise preclude their occurrence.
The Project site is highly disturbed with agricultural activities and is not expected to provide habitat for special status species. Thus, the impact remains less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Less than Significant Impact. Friant Kern Canal, which runs along the northwest corner of the Project site, is an artificial waterway operated and maintained by the Friant Water Authority. As it is hydrologically connected to the San Joaquin River, the Friant Kern Canal is likely under the jurisdiction of the USACE and therefore subject to provisions of the Clean Water Act. The Project will involve constructing residences in the canal vicinity; however, no impacts to the Friant Kern Canal are anticipated. As such, any impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 36 c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Less than Significant Impact. According to the National Wetlands Inventory7, no wetlands occur in or near the Project site. Impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Migratory birds are expected to nest on and near the Project site. The Project has the potential to impede the use of nursery sites for native birds protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Fish and Game Code. Disturbance associated with construction during the breeding season could result in the incidental loss of fertile eggs or nestlings or otherwise lead to nest abandonment. Disturbance that causes nest abandonment or loss of reproductive effort is considered take by the CDFW. Loss of fertile eggs or nestlings, or any activities resulting in nest abandonment, could constitute a significant impact if the species is particularly rare in the region. Construction activities that disturb a rare nesting bird on the site or immediately adjacent to the construction zone could constitute a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO1 would ensure that potential impacts remain less than significant.
Mitigation Measures:
Protecting nesting birds.
BIO-1 Within 30 days prior to ground disturbance activities associated with construction or grading that would occur during the nesting/breeding season of native bird species potentially nesting on the site (typically March through August in the project region, or as determined by a qualified biologist), the applicant shall have weekly surveys 7 United States Environmental Protection Agency. NEPAssist, National Wetlands Inventory. https://nepassisttool.epa.gov/nepassist/nepamap.aspx. Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 37 conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if active nests of bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and/or the California Fish and Game Code are present in the disturbance zone or within 300 feet (500 feet for raptors and special-status species) of the disturbance zone. The surveys shall continue on a weekly basis with the last survey being conducted no more than seven days prior to initiation of disturbance work. If ground disturbance activities are delayed, then additional pre-disturbance surveys shall be conducted such that no more than seven days will have elapsed between the survey and ground disturbance activities. If active nests are found, clearing and construction within 300 feet of the nest (500 feet for raptors and special-status species) shall be postponed or halted, at the discretion of the biologist, until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, as determined by the biologist, and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Limits of construction to avoid an active nest shall be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers and construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas. The biologist shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities will occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur. Results of the surveys shall be provided to CDFG in the Annual Mitigation Status Report.
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Less than Significant Impact. The City of Porterville’s General Plan includes various policies for the protection of biological resources. The proposed Project would not conflict with any of the adopted policies and any impacts would be considered less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Less than Significant Impact. Several conservation and recovery plans apply to land in the City, including the Recovery Plan for Upland Species of the San Joaquin Valley and the Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle Habitat Conservation Plan. Figure 6-4 (Special Status Species and Sensitive Vegetation) in the City of Porterville’s General Plan indicates the Project site is not within an area set aside for the Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 38 conservation of habitat or sensitive plant or animal species pursuant to such plans. The nearest such areas are the Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beatle Conservation Area, located along the Tule River within the Yaudanchi Ecological Reserve. As such, any impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 39 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Archaeological resources are places where human activity has measurably altered the earth or left deposits of physical remains. Archaeological resources may be either prehistoric (before the introduction of writing in a particular area) or historic (after the introduction of writing). The majority of such places in this region are associated with either Native American or Euroamerican occupation of the area. The most frequently encountered prehistoric and early historic Native American archaeological sites are village settlements with residential areas and sometimes cemeteries; temporary camps where food and raw materials were collected; smaller, briefly occupied sites where tools were manufactured or repaired; and special-use areas like caves, rock shelters, and sites of rock art. Historic archaeological sites may include foundations or features such as privies, corrals, and trash dumps.
The City of Porterville and Tulare County was inhabited by indigenous California Native American groups consisting of the Southern Valley Yokuts, Foothill Yokuts, Monache, and Tubatulabal. Most information regarding these groups is based on Spanish government and Franciscan mission records of the 18th and 19th centuries, and in studies conducted during the 1900s to 1930s by American and British ethnographers. The ethnographic setting presented below is derived from the early works, compiled by W. J. Wallace, Robert F.G. Spier, and Charles R. Smith, with statistical information provided by the California Native American Heritage Commission.
Of the four main groups inhabiting the Tulare County area, the Southern Valley Yokuts occupied the largest territory, which is defined roughly by the crest of the Diablo Range on the west and the foothills Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 40 of the Sierra Nevada on the east, and from the Kings River on the north, to the Tehachapi Mountains on the south. The Foothill Yokuts inhabited the western slopes of the Sierra Nevada, between the Fresno River and Kern River, with settlements generally occurring between the 2,000 to 4,000-foot elevations.
The Tubatulabal inhabited the Sierra Nevada Mountains, at the higher elevations, near Mt. Whitney in the east, extending westward along the drainages of the Kern River, and the Kern River-South Fork. The Monache were comprised of six small groups that lived in the Sierras east of the Foothill Yokuts, in locations ranging between 3,000- to 7,000-foot elevations.
A records search of the site files and maps was conducted at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Archaeological Information Center, California State University, Bakersfield (see Appendix A). These investigations determined that there were no previous cultural resource studies performed within the Project area and there have been three cultural resources studies performed within a one-half mile radius.
There are no recorded resources within the Project area and there is one recorded resource, the FriantKern Canal, within the one-half mile radius.
Regulatory Setting
Federal
Cultural resources are protected by several federal regulations, none of which are relevant to this proposed Project because it will not be located on lands administered by a federal agency and the Project applicant is not requesting federal funding.
State
The proposed Project is subject to CEQA which requires public or private projects financed or approved by public agencies to assess their effects on historical resources. CEQA uses the term “historical resources” to include buildings, sites, structures, objects or districts, each of which may have historical, prehistoric, architectural, archaeological, cultural, or scientific importance. CEQA states that if implementation of a project results in significant effects on historical resources, then alternative plans or mitigation measures must be considered; however, only significant historical resources need to be addressed (CCR 15064.5, 15126.4). For the purposes of this CEQA document, a significant impact would occur if project implementation:
• Causes a substantial change in the significance of a historical resource • Causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource • Disturbs any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 41 Therefore, before impacts and mitigation measures can be identified, the significance of historical resources must be determined. CEQA guidelines define three ways that a property may qualify as a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA review:
• If the resource is listed in or determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR)
• If the resource is included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC or identified as significant in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant
• The lead agency determines the resource to be significant as supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record (CCR, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15064.5(a)) Each of these ways of qualifying as a historical resource for the purpose of CEQA is related to the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the CRHR (PRC 5020.1(k), 5024.1, 5024.1(g)).
A historical resource may be eligible for inclusion in the CRHR if it:
• Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage
• Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past • Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values • Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history Properties that area listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places are considered eligible for listing in the CRHR, and thus are significant historical resources for the purpose of CEQA (PRC Section 5024.1(d)(1)).
Public Resources Code §5097.5
California Public Resources Code §5097.5 prohibits excavation or removal of any “vertebrate paleontological site...or any other archaeological, paleontological or historical feature, situated on public lands, except with express permission of the public agency having jurisdiction over such lands.” Public lands are defined to include lands owned by or under the jurisdiction of the state or any city, county, district, authority or public corporation, or any agency thereof. Section 5097.5 states that any Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 42 unauthorized disturbance or removal of archaeological, historical, or paleontological materials or sites located on public lands is a misdemeanor.
Human Remains
Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code states that in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the coroner of the county in which the remains are discovered has determined whether or not the remains are subject to the coroner’s authority. If the human remains are of Native American origin, the coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours of this identification.
The Native American Heritage Commission will identify a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) to inspect the site and provide recommendations for the proper and dignified treatment of the remains and associated grave artifacts.
Local
Porterville General Plan Policies
• OSC-G-11: Identify and protect archaeological, paleontological, and historic resources. • OSC-I-73: Require that new development analyze and avoid any potential impacts to archaeological, paleontological, and historic resources by:
o Requiring a records review for development proposed in areas that are considered archaeologically sensitive, including hillsides and near the Tule River; o Studying the potential effects of development and construction (as required by CEQA);
o Developing, where appropriate, mitigation measures to minimize potential impacts; and Implementing appropriate measures to avoid the identified impacts.
RESPONSES
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 43 Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The records search conducted at the SSJVIC (Appendix A) indicated that there are no recorded cultural resources within the Project area and one recorded resource within the one-half mile, the Friant-Kern Canal. There are no recorded cultural resources within the Project area or within ½ mile that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.
Subsurface construction activities associated with the proposed Project could potentially damage or destroy previously undiscovered historic resources. This is considered a potentially significant impact; however, implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 will ensure that significant impacts remain less than significant with mitigation incorporation.
CUL-1 The following measures shall be implemented:
• Before initiation of construction or ground-disturbing activities associated with the Project, the City shall require all construction personnel to be alerted to the possibility of buried cultural resources, including historic, archeological and paleontological resources; • The general contractor and its supervisory staff shall be responsible for monitoring the construction Project for disturbance of cultural resources; and • If a potentially significant historical, archaeological, or paleontological resource, such as structural features, unusual amounts of bone or shell, artifacts, human remains, or architectural remains or trash deposits are encountered during subsurface construction activities (i.e., trenching, grading), all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the identified potential resource shall cease until a qualified archaeologist evaluates the item for its significance and records the item on the appropriate State Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms. The archaeologist shall determine whether the item requires further study. If, after the qualified archaeologist conducts appropriate technical analyses, the item is determined to be significant under California Environmental Quality Act, the archaeologist shall recommend feasible mitigation measures, which may include avoidance, preservation in place or other appropriate measure, as outlined in Public Resources Code section 21083.2. The City of Porterville shall implement said measures. b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 44 Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The possibility exists that subsurface construction activities may encounter undiscovered archaeological resources. This would be a potentially significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would require inadvertently discovery practices to be implemented should previously undiscovered archeological resources be located. As such, impacts to undiscovered archeological resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporation. c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. There are no unique geological features or known fossilbearing sediments in the vicinity of the proposed Project site. However, there remains the possibility for previously unknown, buried paleontological resources or unique geological sites to be uncovered during subsurface construction activities. Therefore, this would be a potentially significant impact. Mitigation is proposed requiring standard inadvertent discovery procedures to be implemented to reduce this impact to a level of less than significant with mitigation incorporation.
CUL-2 The Project applicant will incorporate into the construction contract(s) a provision that in the event a fossil or fossil formations are discovered during any subsurface construction activities for the proposed Project (i.e., trenching, grading), all excavations within 100 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted until the find is examined by a qualified paleontologist, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate representative at the City of Porterville, who shall coordinate with the paleontologist as to any necessary investigation of the find. If the find is determined to be significant under CEQA, the City shall implement those measures, which may include avoidance, preservation in place, or other appropriate measures, as outlined in Public Resources Code section 21083.2.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 45 VI. ENERGY
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
California’s total energy consumption is second-highest in the nation, but in 2018 the state’s per capita energy consumption ranked the fourth-lowest, due in part to its mild climate and its energy efficiency programs. 8 In 2018, California was the top-ranking producer of electricity from solar, geothermal and biomass energy, and second in the nation in conventional hydroelectric power generation.
Energy usage is typically quantified using the British thermal unit (BTU). As a point of reference, the approximately amounts of energy contained in common energy sources are as follows:
Energy Source BTUs9
Gasoline 120,429 per gallon
Natural Gas 1,037 per cubic foot
Electricity 3,412 per kilowatt-hour
8 U.S. Energy Information Administration. Independent Statistics and Analysis. California Profile Overview. https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-1. Accessed April 2021. 9 U.S. Energy Information Administration. Energy Units and Calculators Explained. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=about_energy_units. Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 46 California electrical consumption in 2018 was 7,876.8 trillion BTU10, as provided in Table 3, while total electrical consumption by Tulare County in 2019 was 14.202 trillion BTU.11 Table 3 – 2018 California Energy Consumption12
End User BTU of energy
consumed (in trillions)
Percentage of total
consumption
Residential 1,440.1 18.3
Commercial 1,510.4 19.2
Industrial 1,847.9 23.5
Transportation 3,078.4 39.1
Total 7,876.8 --
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) reports that approximately 25.6 million automobiles, 5.2 million trucks, and 857,677 motorcycles were registered in the state in 2019, while in 2017 a total estimated 344.3 billion vehicles miles were traveled (VMT).13 Applicable Regulations
California Energy Code (Title 24, Part 6, Building Energy Efficiency Standards) California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6 comprises the California Energy Code, which was adopted to ensure that building construction, system design and installation achieve energy efficiency. The California Energy Code was first established in 1978 by the CEC in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption, and apply to energy consumed for heating, cooling, ventilation, water heating, and lighting in new residential and non-residential buildings. The standards are updated periodically to increase the baseline energy efficiency requirements. The 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards focus on several key areas to improve the energy efficiency of newly constructed buildings and additions and alterations to existing buildings and include requirements to enable both demand reductions during critical peak periods and future solar electric and thermal system installations.
Although it was not originally intended to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, electricity production by fossil fuels results in GHG emissions and energy efficient buildings require less electricity. Therefore, increased energy efficiency results in decreased GHG emissions. 10 U.S. Energy Information Administration. Independent Statistics and Analysis. California Profile Overview. https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-1. Accessed April 2021. 11 California Energy Commission. Electricity Consumption by County. http://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx. Accessed April 2021. 12U.S. Energy Information Administration. Independent Statistics and Analysis. California Profile Overview. https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-1. Accessed April 2021. 13 Caltrans. 2017. California Transportation Fact Booklet. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-systeminformation/documents/caltrans-fact-booklets/2019-cfb-a11y.pdf. Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 47 California Green Building Standards Code (Title 24, Part II, CALGreen) The California Building Standards Commission adopted the California Green Buildings Standards Code (CALGreen in Part 11 of the Title 24 Building Standards Code) for all new construction statewide on July 17, 2008. Originally a volunteer measure, the code became mandatory in 2010 and the most recent update (2019) went on January 1, 2020. CALGreen sets targets for energy efficiency, water consumption, dual plumbing systems for potable and recyclable water, diversion of construction waste from landfills, and use of environmentally sensitive materials in construction and design, including eco-friendly flooring, carpeting, paint, coatings, thermal insulation, and acoustical wall and ceiling panels. The 2019 CALGreen Code includes mandatory measures for non-residential development related to site development; water use; weather resistance and moisture management; construction waste reduction, disposal, and recycling; building maintenance and operation; pollutant control; indoor air quality; environmental comfort; and outdoor air quality. Mandatory measures for residential development pertain to green building; planning and design; energy efficiency; water efficiency and conservation; material conservation and resource efficiency; environmental quality; and installer and special inspector qualifications.
Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act (SB 350)
The Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act (SB 350) was passed by California Governor Brown on October 7, 2015, and establishes new clean energy, clean air, and greenhouse gas reduction goals for the year 2030 and beyond. SB 350 establishes a greenhouse gas reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels for the State of California, further enhancing the ability for the state to meet the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2050.
Renewable Portfolio Standard (SB 1078 and SB 107)
Established in 2002 under SB 1078, the state’s Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) was amended under SB 107 to require accelerated energy reduction goals by requiring that by the year 2010, 20 percent of electricity sales in the state be served by renewable energy resources. In years following its adoption, Executive Order S-14-08 was signed, requiring electricity retail sellers to provide 33 percent of their service loads with renewable energy by the year 2020. In 2011, SB X1-2 was signed, aligning the RPS target with the 33 percent requirement by the year 2020. This new RPS applied to all state electricity retailers, including publicly owned utilities, investor-owned utilities, electrical service providers, and community choice aggregators. All entities included under the RPS were required to adopt the RPS 20 percent by year 2020 reduction goal by the end of 2013, adopt a reduction goal of 25 percent by the end of 2016, and meet the 33 percent reduction goal by the end of 2020. In addition, the Air Resources Board, Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 48 under Executive Order S-21-09, was required to adopt regulations consistent with these 33 percent renewable energy targets.
RESPONSES
a. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed Project consists of the development of a 233 residential development. The Project would introduce energy usage on a site that is currently demanding minimal energy. By comparison, at buildout, the Project would consume amounts of energy in both the short-term during Project construction and in the long-term during Project operation. Therefore, this impact is potentially significant.
This topic will be addressed in the Project’s forthcoming EIR.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 49 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a. Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil?
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18-1-B of the most recently
adopted Uniform Building Code
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 50 creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of Porterville is situated along the western slope of the Sierra Nevada. The Sierra Nevada geomorphic province is primarily composed of cretaceous granitic plutons and remnants of Paleozoic and Mesozoic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks, and Cenozoic volcan and sedimentary rocks.
The majority of Porterville has elevations ranging from 400 to 800 feet.
Faulting and Seismicity
There are no known active earthquake faults in the City of Porterville. The proposed Project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone and no known faults cut through the local soil at the site. There are several faults located within a 70-mile radius of the proposed Project site. An unnamed fault is approximately seven miles south, Poso Creek Fault is approximately 32 miles southwest, Kern Canyon Fault is approximately 35 miles east, White Wolf Fault Zone is approximately 60 miles southwest, and San Andreas and Cholame-Carrizo Fault sections are approximately 70 miles southwest of the proposed Project site. These faults have exhibited activity in the last 1.6 million years, but not in the last 200 years. It is possible, but unlikely, that previously unknown faults could become active in the area. No Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones are in or near Porterville. Porterville is designated as an area in Seismic Design Category 4 according to the most recent version of the California Building Code. Under this designation, earthquake resistant design and materials are required to meet or exceed the current seismic engineering standards of the Building Code.
Soils
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 51 According to the City’s General Plan EIR, much of the Project area has soils with moderate to high erosion potential. Generally, areas most susceptible to soil erosion are hilly or have slopes greater than 15 percent.
Lower flatlands, such as the subject site, are usually less likely to erode than those located on slopes.
Regulatory Setting
Federal
Federal regulations for geology and soils are not relevant to the proposed Project because it is not a federal undertaking (the Project site is not located on lands administered by a federal agency, and the Project applicant is not requesting federal funding or a federal permit).
State
California Building Code
California law provides a minimum standard for building design through the California Building Code (CBC). The CBC is based on the IBC, with amendments for California conditions. Part 2, Volume 2, Chapter 16 of the CBC contains specific requirements for seismic safety. Part 2, Volume 2, Chapter 18 of the CBC regulates soils and foundations. Part 2, Volume 2, Appendix J of the CBC regulates grading activities. Construction activities also are subject to occupational safety standards for excavation, shoring, and trenching as specified in California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations) and in section A33 of the CBC. About one-third of the text within the California Building Code has been tailored for California earthquake conditions.
Paleontological Resources
Paleontological resources are the fossilized remains of plants and animals and associated deposits. The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology has identified vertebrate fossils, their taphonomic and associated environmental indicators, and fossiliferous deposits as significant nonrenewable paleontological resources. Botanical and invertebrate fossils and assemblages may also be considered significant resources.
CEQA requires that a determination be made as to whether a project would directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature (CEQA Appendix G(v)(c)). If an impact is significant, CEQA requires feasible measures to minimize the impact (CCR Title 14(3) §15126.4 (a)(1)). California Public Resources Code §5097.5 (see above) also applies to paleontological resources.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 52 In addition, the proposed Project is being evaluated pursuant to CEQA.
Local
Porterville General Plan Policies
• OSC-G-5: Preserve soil resources to minimize damage to people, property, and the environment resulting from potential hazards.
• OSC-G-6: Protect significant mineral resources.
• OSC-I-21: Adopt soil conservation regulations to reduce erosion caused by overgrazing, plowing, mining, new roadways and paths, construction, and off-road vehicles. • OSC-I-23: Require adequate grading and replanting to minimize erosion and prevent slippage of manmade slopes.
• PHS-G-4: Protect soils, surface water, and groundwater from contamination from hazardous materials.
• PHS-G-1: Minimize risks of property damage and personal injury posed by geologic and seismic hazards.
• PHS-I-2: Maintain and enforce appropriate building standards and codes to avoid and/or reduce risks associated with geologic constraints and to ensure that all new construction is designed to meet current safety regulations.
• PHS-I-17: Require remediation and cleanup of sites contaminated with hazardous substances.
RESPONSES
a-i. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
No Impact. The proposed Project site is not located within a currently designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Additionally, according to the Fault Rupture Zones Map prepared by the California Department of Conservation in 2007, the Project area is not located within a Fault‐Rupture Hazard Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 53 Area.14 Since no known surface expression of active faults is believed to cross the site, fault rupture through the site is not anticipated. No impacts would occur.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
a-ii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? Less than Significant Impact. Although the Project area occurs in an area with historically low to moderate level of seismicity, strong ground shaking could occur in the region; however, the Project would be designed to withstand strong ground shaking, in compliance with the California Building Code, to minimize the potential effects of ground shaking and other seismic activity. Impacts from seismic ground shaking would result in less than significant impacts.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
a-iii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less than Significant Impact. See Response a-ii. According to the City of Porterville General Plan, Public Health and Safety Element the Project site has a moderate to high risk of damaging ground motion; however, the Project’s Valley location has a low risk of liquefaction. No Subsidence prone soils or oil or gas production is involved with the proposed Project. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
a-iv. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides?
Less than Significant Impact. The City of Porterville’s 2030 General Plan, Figure 7-1 (Geological and Soil Hazards) indicates that the proposed Project site is located on relatively flat topography and is not 14 California Department of Conservation. CGS Information Warehouse. Regulatory Maps and Reports. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/regulatorymaps/. Accessed May 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 54 located adjacent to any steep slopes or areas that would otherwise be subject to landslides. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Porterville sits on top of the alluvial fans of the Tule River and its distributaries. The soil in the proposed Project area is characterized as moderately deep, well-drained, sandy loam underlain by hardpan. The Project site has a generally flat topography, is in an established urban area and does not include any Project features that would result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil.
Therefore, the impact is less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
No Impact. The City of Porterville sits on top of the alluvial fans of the Tule River and its distributaries.
The soil in the proposed Project area is characterized as moderately deep, well-drained, sandy loam underlain by hardpan. See also Response a-ii. There is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the most recently adopted Uniform Building Code creating substantial risks to life or property? Less than Significant Impact. See Responses (c) and (a-ii). The impact is less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 55 No Impact. The Project will tie into the City’s existing wastewater system and will not require installation of a septic tank or alternate wastewater disposal system. There is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The General Plan does not identify any unique geologic features within the Planning Area and according to the CHRIS search results, there are no known paleontological resources on or near the site; however, it is unknown if any subsurface unique paleontological resources exist. Mitigation measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 shall be implemented to reduce potential impacts and as such, impacts are considered less than significant with mitigation incorporation.
Mitigation Measures: CUL-1 and CUL-2.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 56 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Various gases in the earth’s atmosphere play an important role in moderating the earth’s surface temperature. Solar radiation enters earth’s atmosphere from space and a portion of the radiation is absorbed by the earth’s surface. The earth emits this radiation back toward space, but the properties of the radiation change from high-frequency solar radiation to lower-frequency infrared radiation. GHGs are transparent to solar radiation, but are effective in absorbing infrared radiation. Consequently, radiation that would otherwise escape back into space is retained, resulting in a warming of the earth’s atmosphere. This phenomenon is known as the greenhouse effect. Scientific research to date indicates that some of the observed climate change is a result of increased GHG emissions associated with human activity. Among the GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, Nitrous Oxide (NOx), and chlorofluorocarbons. Human-caused emissions of these GHGs in excess of natural ambient concentrations are considered responsible for enhancing the greenhouse effect. GHG emissions contributing to global climate change are attributable, in large part, to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. In California, the transportation sector is the largest emitter of GHGs, followed by electricity generation. Global climate change is, indeed, a global issue. GHGs are global pollutants, unlike criteria pollutants and TACs (which are pollutants of regional and/or local concern). Global climate change, if it occurs, could potentially affect water resources in California. Rising temperatures could be anticipated to result in sea-level rise (as polar ice caps melt) and possibly change the timing and amount of precipitation, which could alter water quality. According to some, climate change could result in more extreme weather patterns; both heavier precipitation that could lead to flooding, as well as more extended drought periods. There is uncertainty regarding the timing, magnitude, and nature of the potential changes to water resources as a result of climate change; however, several trends are evident.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 57 Snowpack and snowmelt may also be affected by climate change. Much of California’s precipitation falls as snow in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascades, and snowpack represents approximately 35 percent of the state’s useable annual water supply. The snowmelt typically occurs from April through July; it provides natural water flow to streams and reservoirs after the annual rainy season has ended. As air temperatures increase due to climate change, the water stored in California’s snowpack could be affected by increasing temperatures resulting in: (1) decreased snowfall, and (2) earlier snowmelt.
Regulatory Setting
Federal
The USEPA Mandatory Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 98), which became effective December 29, 2009, requires that all facilities that emit more than 25,000 metric tons CO2-equivalent per year beginning in 2010, report their emissions on an annual basis. On May 13, 2010, the USEPA issued a final rule that established an approach to addressing GHG emissions from stationary sources under the CAA permitting programs. The final rule set thresholds for GHG emissions that define when permits under the New Source Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration and title V Operating Permit programs are required for new and existing industrial facilities.
In addition, the Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA (Supreme Court Case 05-1120) found that the USEPA has the authority to list GHGs as pollutants and to regulate emissions of GHGs under the CAA. On April 17, 2009, the USEPA found that CO2, CH4, NOx, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride may contribute to air pollution and may endanger public health and welfare. This finding may result in the USEPA regulating GHG emissions; however, to date the USEPA has not proposed regulations based on this finding.
State
California is taking action to reduce GHG emissions. In June 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-3-05 to address climate change and GHG emissions in California. This order sets the following goals for statewide GHG emissions:
• Reduce to 2000 levels by 2010
• Reduce to 1990 levels by 2020
• Reduce to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050
In addition, the proposed Project is being evaluated pursuant to CEQA.
Local
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 58 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) In August 2008, the SJVAPCD adopted the Climate Change Action Plan, which directed the SJVAPCD to develop guidance to assist lead agencies, project proponents, permit applicants, and interested parties in assessing and reducing the impacts of project specific greenhouse gas emissions on global climate change.
In 2009, the SJVAPCD adopted the guidance document: Guidance for Valley Land-Use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects Under CEQA. This document recommends the usage of performance-based standards, otherwise knowns as Best Performance Standards (BPS), to assess significance of project-specific greenhouse gas emissions on global climate change during the environmental review process. Projects implementing BPS in accordance with SJVAPCD’s guidance would be determined to have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact on greenhouse gas emissions and would not require project specific quantification of greenhouse gas emissions.15
RESPONSES
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Potentially Significant Impact. Greenhouse gas emissions would generate from long-term area and mobile sources as well as indirectly from energy consumption. Mobile sources would include residential vehicle trips and area source emissions would result from consumption of natural gas and electricity.
Potential impacts to greenhouse gas emissions are potentially significant and as such, will be analyzed in the forthcoming EIR.
15 SJVAPCD. Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. March 19, 2015. http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/GAMAQI_3-19-15.pdf. Accessed April 2021. Page 112.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 59 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e. For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project
area?
f. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 60 response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
g. Expose people or structures either directly
or indirectly to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located in the northwestern portion of the City of Porterville, near primarily residential and agricultural land uses. The site is currently in agricultural use, specifically planted with orchards.
Residences exist within a quarter-mile of the Project site on all sides. The Project site is approximately four miles north of the Porterville Municipal Airport. Fresno-Yosemite International Airport is the closest major airport to the proposed Project site, approximately 59 miles northwest.
The Teapot Dome Landfill plant is approximately five miles southwest of the City limits, while the Porterville Wastewater Treatment Plant is located approximately 1.5 miles southeast of the site.
Regulatory Setting
Federal
The primary federal agencies with responsibility for hazardous materials management include the EPA, U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created to protect human health and to safeguard the natural environment – air, water and land – and works closely with other federal agencies, and state and local governments to develop and enforce regulations under existing environmental laws. Where national standards are not met, EPA can issue sanctions and take other steps to assist the states in reaching the desired levels of environmental quality. EPA also works with industries and all levels of government in a wide variety of voluntary pollution prevention programs and energy conservation efforts.
State
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 61 The California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and Health is the administering agency designed to protect worker health and general facility safety. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has designated the area that includes the proposed Project site as a Local Responsibility Area, defined as an area where the local fire jurisdiction is responsible for emergency fire response.
In addition, the proposed Project is being evaluated pursuant to CEQA.
Local
City of Porterville Fire Department
The City of Porterville Fire Department, Fire Prevention Division provides limited oversight of hazardous materials. The Fire Department is responsible for conducting inspections for code compliance and fire-safe practices, permitting of certain hazardous materials, and for investigation of fire and hazardous materials incidents. The Fire Department regulates explosive and hazardous materials under the California Building Code, and permits the handling, storage and use of any explosive or other hazardous material.
Tulare County Environmental Health Division
The Tulare County Environmental Health Division (TCEHD) is the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for all cities and unincorporated areas within Tulare County. The CUPA was created by the California Legislature to minimize the number of inspections and different fees for businesses. The TCEHD provides the management and record keeping of hazardous materials and underground storage tank (UST) sites for Tulare County, including the City of Porterville.
Porterville General Plan Policies
• PHS-I-17: Require remediation and cleanup of sites contaminated with hazardous substances. • PHS-I-18: Adopt a Household Hazardous Waste Program and support the proper disposal of hazardous household waste and waste oil; encourage citizens and crime watch organizations to report unlawful dumping of hazardous materials.
• PHS-I-19: Ensure that all specified hazardous facilities conform to the Tulare County Hazardous Waste Management Plan.
• PHS-I-21: Coordinate enforcement of the Hazardous Material Disclosure Law and the implementation of the Hazardous Material Emergency Response Plan with the Tulare County Health and Human Service Agency.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 62
RESPONSES
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
The proposed Project would include the construction of up to 233 single-family residential homes with the associated improvements. Proposed Project construction activities may involve the use and transport of hazardous materials. These materials may include fuels, oils, mechanical fluids, and other chemicals used during construction. Transportation, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials during construction activities would be required to comply with applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Compliance would ensure that human health and the environment are not exposed to hazardous materials. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program through the submission and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan during construction activities to prevent contaminated runoff from leaving the project site. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur during construction activities.
The operational phase of the proposed Project would occur after construction is completed and residents move in to occupy the structures on a day-to-day basis. Upon Annexation and Rezone approval, the proposed Project will include land uses that are considered compatible with the surrounding uses. The current land uses are also considered compatible with the surrounding uses. None of these land uses routinely transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials, or present a reasonably foreseeable release of hazardous materials, with the exception of common residential grade hazardous materials such as household and commercial cleaners, paint, etc. The proposed Project would not create a significant hazard through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through the reasonably foreseeable upset and accidental conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment occur. Therefore, the proposed Project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment and any impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 63 Less than Significant Impact. See Response a. above. Any accumulated hazardous construction or operational wastes will be collected and transported away from the site in compliance with all federal, state and local regulations. Any impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant Impact. The Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus is located within onequarter mile of the Project site. As the proposed Project includes the development of single-family residences, it is not reasonably foreseeable that the proposed Project will cause a significant impact by emitting hazardous waste or bringing hazardous materials near a proposed or existing school.
Residential land uses do not generate, store, or dispose of significant quantities of hazardous materials.
Such uses also do not normally involve dangerous activities that could expose persons onsite or in the surrounding areas to large quantities of hazardous materials. See also Responses a. and b. regarding hazardous material handling. The impact is less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
No Impact. The proposed Project site is not located on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (Geotracker and EnviroStordatabases – accessed in April 2021). As such, no impacts would occur that would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 64 No Impact. The proposed Project site is approximately four miles north of the Porterville Municipal Airport. Upon Annexation and Rezone approval, land use controls for this area will be provided by the City of Porterville General Plan and Development Ordinance, and the Tulare County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, Part 77.21. Additionally, the Tulare County Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan indicates that the Project area is outside the Proposed Airport Influence Area. The Project site is not within an established Airport Safety Zone. There is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. The Project will not interfere with any adopted emergency response or evacuation plan.
There is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
g. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact. There are no wildlands on or near the Project site. There is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 65 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER
QUALITY
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a. Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or
ground water quality?
b. Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which
would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off- site;
ii. substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or
offsite;
iii. create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff; or
iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 66 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER
QUALITY
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management
plan?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of Porterville has a dry, desert-like climate with evaporation rates that exceed rainfall. Annual precipitation within the proposed Project site is about 10 inches, almost 85% of which falls between the months of October and March. Nearly all precipitation falls in the form of rain and storm-water readily infiltrates the soils of the surrounding the sites.
The City of Porterville is located in the Tulare Lake Basin, and within the Tule Sub-basin. which has been classified as a critically overdrafted basin.16 According to the City’s General Plan EIR, wells in and around the city have shown a moderate groundwater level decline of about 0.75 feet per year over the past 20 years. The City’s municipal wells are generally scattered west of Plano Avenue and south of Westfield Avenue and the distribution system is operated under pressure. The City of Porterville receives all of its municipal water from groundwater.17
According to the City of Porterville 2015 Urban Water Master Plan (UWMP)18, water demands within the City’s service area are largely residential, with commercial, industrial, institutional, and City-related consumption accounts for approximately 25% of the total water demand. 16 California Department of Water Resources. Critically Overdrafted Basins Map. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/GroundwaterManagement/Bulletin-118/Critically-Overdrafted-Basins. Accessed May 2021. 17 City of Porterville – Hydraulic Analysis, page 1. Dee Jaspar & Associates, Inc. (May 2015). 18 City of Porterville 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. October 2017. http://www.ci.porterville.ca.us/documents/2015UWMPUpdateFinal.pdf. Accessed May 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 67 The City’s water use increased in a fairly linear fashion up through 2007. Beginning in 2008, water use began to decline due to economic conditions and water conservation measures. The City produced/used approximately 3,117 MG (9,565 ac/ft/yr) of water from groundwater supplies to serve a population of 65,702 in 2015. Of that, approximately 1,786 MG were for single family residential. 19 This was approximately 37% less than what the General Plan projected for water use for Year 2015. It should also be noted that actual population growth within the City has not kept up with the population growth projections of the General Plan. Therefore, the actual water use in the City is less than what was projected under the City’s General Plan.
The City implements its Drought Response Plan during certain times of the year when watering is limited or restricted. Currently, the City is in Drought Response Phase IV which prohibits residential outdoor watering six days per week. This and other mandatory water conservation measures are being enforced with fines of up to $500 for non-compliance.20
Regulatory Setting
Federal
Clean Water Act
The Clean Water Act (CWA) is intended to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters (33 CFR 1251). The regulations implementing the CWA protect waters of the U.S. including streams and wetlands (33 CFR 328.3). The CWA requires states to set standards to protect, maintain, and restore water quality by regulating point source and some non-point source discharges. Under Section 402 of the CWA, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit process was established to regulate these discharges.
The National Flood Insurance Act (1968) makes available federally subsidized flood insurance to owners of flood-prone properties. To facilitate identifying areas with flood potential, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) that can be used for planning purposes.
State
19 City of Porterville 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. October 2017. http://www.ci.porterville.ca.us/documents/2015UWMPUpdateFinal.pdf. Accessed May 2021. Page 14. 20 City of Porterville, Public Works, Water Conservation. http://www.ci.porterville.ca.us/depts/PublicWorks/waterconservation.cfm Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 68 State Water Resources Control Board
The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), located in Sacramento, is the agency with jurisdiction over water quality issues in the State of California. The SWRCB is governed by the PorterCologne Water Quality Act (Division 7 of the California Water Code), which establishes the legal framework for water quality control activities by the SWRCB. The intent of the Porter-Cologne Act is to regulate factors which may affect the quality of waters of the State to attain the highest quality which is reasonable, considering a full range of demands and values. Much of the implementation of the SWRCB's responsibilities is delegated to its nine Regional Boards. The proposed Project site is located within the Central Valley Region.
Regional Water Quality Board
The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) administers the NPDES storm water-permitting program in the Central Valley region. Construction activities on one acre or more are subject to the permitting requirements of the NPDES General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activity (General Construction Permit). The General Construction Permit requires the preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The plan will include specifications for Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented during proposed Project construction to control degradation of surface water by preventing the potential erosion of sediments or discharge of pollutants from the construction area. The General Construction Permit program was established by the RWQCB for the specific purpose of reducing impacts to surface waters that may occur due to construction activities. BMPs have been established by the RWQCB in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbook (2003), and are recognized as effectively reducing degradation of surface waters to an acceptable level. Additionally, the SWPPP will describe measures to prevent or control runoff degradation after construction is complete, and identify a plan to inspect and maintain these facilities or project elements.
In addition, the proposed Project is being evaluated pursuant to CEQA.
Local
Porterville General Plan Policies
• OSC-I-43: Work with agricultural and industrial uses to ensure that water contamination and waste products are handled in a manner that protects the long-term viability of water resources.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 69 • OSC-I-44: Work with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to ensure that all point source pollutants are adequately mitigated (as part of the CEQA review and project approval process) and monitored to ensure long-term compliance.
• OSC-I-45: Continue to require use of feasible and practical best management practices (BMPs) and other mitigation measures designed to protect surface water and groundwater from the adverse effects of construction activities and urban runoff in coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
• OSC-I-51: Prior to the approval of individual projects, require the City Engineer and/or Building Official to verify that the provisions of applicable point source pollution programs have been satisfied.
• PHS-G-2: Protect the community from risks to life and property posed by flooding and stormwater runoff.
• PU-I-7: Continue to require water meters in all new development. • PU-I-8: Require that agriculture water rights be assigned to the city when agricultural land is annexed to the City for urban development, consistent with the General Plan.
RESPONSES
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
Less than Significant Impact. The State Water Resources Control Board requires any new construction project over an acre to complete a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A SWPPP involves site planning and scheduling, limiting disturbed soil areas, and determining best management practices to minimize the risk of pollution and sediments being discharged from construction sites.
Implementation of the SWPPP will minimize the potential for impacts associated with erosion or siltation onsite or offsite.
The proposed Project will result in wastewater from residential units that will be discharged into the City’s existing wastewater treatment system. The wastewater will be typical of other urban/residential developments consisting of bathrooms, kitchen drains and other similar features. The Project will not discharge any unusual or atypical wastewater.
Additionally, there will be no discharge to any surface or groundwater source. As such, the proposed Project will not violate any water quality standards and will not impact waste discharge requirements.
The impact will be less than significant.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 70 Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less Than Significant Impact.
Water Supply
The information below provides a comparison of existing (baseline) conditions versus potential water use based on full buildout of the proposed project. Existing agricultural water use is based on crop information contained in Tulare County’s Phase I Water Supply Evaluation.21 The site is currently and has historically been farmed with 56 acres of plums. Water usage for orchards in Tulare County is documented to 3.6 acre/feet per year
22 , so it is estimated that the site currently uses 201.6 acre/ft per year (56 acres X 3.6 ac/ft ).
To determine the estimated water use by the proposed Project, this analysis uses the same calculation methods as the City’s UWMP. According to the City’s UWMP, the City has a Year 2020 water usage goal of 179 gallons per capita per day (gpcpd).23 To determine the number of persons (water users) that would result from the proposed Project, this analysis uses the City’s 2015-2023 Housing Element (September 2015) which shows an average household size of 3.39 persons per household in Porterville.24 The proposed Project would include the construction of up to 233 single family residences. Applying the City’s average of 3.39 persons per household, this equates to approximately 790 persons. At 179 gallons per day per capita, the Project would require approximately 51.6 MG per year of potable water, or 158.35 acre/feet per year (790 residents X 179 gpcpd X 365 days = 51,614,650 gallons of potable water per year). As discussed above, the existing agricultural operations on-site require approximately 201.6 acre/feet per year, which is more than what the residential development will utilize. Additionally, the proposed land use changes will eliminate the Medium Density Residential and Neighborhood C 21 Tulare County General Plan 2030 Update. Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report. Appendix G - Phase I Water Supply Evaluation for Tulare County.
http://generalplan.co.tulare.ca.us/documents/GP/002Board%20of%20Supervisors%20Materials/001BOS%20Agenda%20Items%20- %20Public%20Hearing%20August,%2028%202012/002Attachment%20A.%20FEIR/001Exhibit%201.%20FEIR%20Exec%20Summary%20&%20C hap%201-6/Appendix%20G%20-%20Phase%20I%20Water%20Supply%20Evaluation.pdf. Accessed April 2021. 22 Tulare County General Plan 2030 Update. Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report. Appendix G - Phase I Water Supply Evaluation for Tulare County. Table 2.4.
http://generalplan.co.tulare.ca.us/documents/GP/002Board%20of%20Supervisors%20Materials/001BOS%20Agenda%20Items%20- %20Public%20Hearing%20August,%2028%202012/002Attachment%20A.%20FEIR/001Exhibit%201.%20FEIR%20Exec%20Summary%20&%20C hap%201-6/Appendix%20G%20-%20Phase%20I%20Water%20Supply%20Evaluation.pdf. Accessed April 2021. 23 Porterville 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (October 2017), page 15. 24 Porterville Housing Element 2015-2023 (Sept 2015), page 30.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 71 Commercial and redesignate the land to Low Density Residential, which will be a less intense use than what was planned for and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Further, the City engineer has indicated that the City will be able to sufficiently serve water to the proposed Project.25 As such, the impact to water supply is determined to be less than significant.
Water Availability
The proposed Project is anticipated to utilize City groundwater to support the residential development.
The City has historically used groundwater to meet all of their water demands. Although the City’s aquifer is in a state of overdraft, they could still meet their water demands for several more years solely with groundwater.26 However, the City recognizes that continued overdraft of the City’s groundwater is not sustainable. As such, the City has and/or is planning to implement several mechanisms to address this shortfall. These include reliance on surface water, increased groundwater recharge projects, and consolidated water projects. The City’s General Plan EIR indicates that by 2030, total water demand by the City will be 30,000 acre-feet per year, which will exceed the groundwater availability. However, as noted previously, actual population growth within the City has not kept up with the population growth projections of the General Plan. Therefore, the actual water use in the City is less than what was projected under the City’s General Plan. The Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) indicates that future demand can be met with continued groundwater pumping, surface water purchases and conservation measures. Additionally, as discussed above, the proposed Project will demand less water than what is currently being utilized to grow orchards. As such, there is a less than significant impact to this impact area.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite; ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite;
25 Michael Knight, City of Porterville Public Works Director, email communication. 26 Porterville UWMP, page 42. (2010).
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 72 iii. create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
Less than Significant Impact. The site is presently planted in plum orchards, with a single-family residence on the southern boundary as well as the eastern boundary of the parcel. The site will be designed so that during construction storm water is collected in compliance with Portville City standards. At full buildout, the stormwater will tie into the City’s existing storm drain system, which has adequate capacity. The storm water collection system design will be subject to review and approval by the City Public Works Department. Storm water during construction will be managed as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the SWPPP is retained on-site during construction.
Impacts regarding the alteration of drainage patterns to increase runoff that will potentially induce flooding have been discussed in the impact analysis for Response IX-c. Storm water during construction will be managed as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the SWPPP is retained onsite during construction. All other on-site drainage will be collected and deposited in the City’s storm drain system.
Implementation of the proposed Project will not require expansion of the City’s existing stormwater system (other than onsite collection system), nor will it result in additional sources of polluted runoff. The Project would not otherwise degrade water quality and therefore the impact is less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. In flood hazard, tsunami or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is within Zone X, which experiences minimal flood hazards, as indicated by FEMA flood hazard map 06107C1634E, effective 6/16/2009. The site is not within a 100-year flood zone or a 500-year flood zone. The site will be designed for adequate storm drainage.
Flows into the Tule River (located approximately two miles south of the Project site) are controlled by the Success Dam located approximately five miles upstream from the City. A dam failure is usually the result of neglect, poor design, or structural damage caused by a major event such as an earthquake. Dams must be operated and maintained in a safe manner, which is ensured through inspections for safety Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 73 deficiencies, analyses using current technologies and designs, and taking corrective actions as needed based on current engineering practices.
The Project site is located within the Success Dam inundation area, as shown on Figure 7-3 of the 2030 General Plan. This inundation area runs through Porterville, to a location downstream of Corcoran, a distance of approximately 44 miles. The Army Corp Of Engineers (ACOE) is in the process of completing an environmental impact statement for reinforcing the strength of the dam in the event of seismically induced failure. The Project site is within the 0.5-hour to 1-hour inundation zone of Success Dam. In the event of a dam failure, most of the City would be flooded within one hour.
There are no inland water bodies that could be potentially susceptible to a seiche in the Project vicinity.
This precludes the possibility of a seiche inundating the Project site. The Project site is more than 100 miles from the Pacific Ocean, a condition that precludes the possibility of inundation by tsunami. There are no steep slopes that would be susceptible to a mudflow in the Project vicinity, nor are there any volcanically active features that could produce a mudflow in the City of Porterville. This precludes the possibility of a mudflow inundating the Project site.
The Porterville Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), adopted in 2004, includes planning and response scenarios for seismic hazards, extreme weather conditions, landslides, dam failure and other flooding.
The City has designated several evacuation routes through Porterville to be used in case of catastrophic emergencies. In the unlikely event that the dam fails before the ACOE’s proposed dam reinforcement completion date of 2014–2015, the dam owner would follow the emergency action plan (EAP) developed for Success Dam. The EAP includes a notification flowchart, early detection systems, notification for warning and evacuation by state and local emergency management officials, steps to moderate or alleviate the effects of a dam failure, and inundation maps. As such, impacts related to exposure of people or structures to a risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 74 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Physically divide an established
community?
b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Environmental Setting
The proposed Project site is located in the northern part of the City of Porterville and is currently planted with plum orchards. The Project site is bounded to the west by N. Westwood Street, to the south by W.
Westfield Avenue, and to the east by N. Lombardi Street. Residential subdivisions lie to the west, east, and south. Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus lies directly north, with a diagonal of the Friant-Kern Canal along the northwest corner. The Project consists of an Annexation and Rezone to allow the construction of up to 233 single-family residences on approximately 56 acres.
The site is currently prezoned RS-1 (Very Low Density Residential) General Plan Designation, land use and zoning surrounding the site are identified in Table 4.
Table 4
Existing Land Use, General Plan Designation and Zoning
Location Existing Land
Use
Current Zoning
Classification
General Plan
Designation
North Summit Charter
Academy,
Lombardi
Campus and a
portion of the
Friant-Kern Canal.
PS, PK Public Land, Park Land.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 75 Location Existing Land
Use
Current Zoning
Classification
General Plan
Designation
South Residential
development
and vacant land.
RS-2, RM-2 Low Density and Medium
Density Residential.
West Residential
development.
RS-1, RS-2 Low Density Residential.
East Residential
development,
vacant land and
agriculture.
RS-2 Very Low and Low Density
Residential.
Existing land uses in City of Porterville have been organized into generalized categories that are summarized below on Table 5. City of Porterville has a 2030 General Plan planned build-out of approximately 36,341 acres in size, equivalent to approximately 56.6 square-miles.
Table 5
Existing Land Use: City of Porterville Planning Area (2005)27 Generalized Land Use Category Total Percentage
Agriculture/Rural/Conservation 21,270 59%
Single-Family Residential 4,760 13%
Multi-Family Residential 240 1%
Retail Shopping 80 0%
Commercial 760 2%
Industrial 350 1%
Public/Quasi-Public 2,630 7%
Vacant 3,590 10%
Unclassified (Roads, water, etc.) 2,661 7%
Total Area 36,341 100%
Regulatory Setting
Federal
27 City of Porterville General Plan, Land Use Element.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 76 Federal regulations for land use are not relevant to the proposed Project because it is not a federal undertaking (the proposed Project site is not located on lands administered by a federal agency, and the Project applicant is not requesting federal funding or a federal permit).
State
SB 330 Housing Crisis Act of 2019
On October 9, 2019, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 into law, commonly known as Senate Bill 330 (Chapter 654, Statutes of 2019) to respond to the California housing crisis.
Effective January 1, 2020, SB330 aims to increase residential unit development, protect existing housing inventory, and expedite permit processing. This new law makes a number of modifications to existing legislation, such as the Permit Streamlining Act and the Housing Accountability Act and institutes the Housing Crisis Act of 2019. Many of the changes proposed last for a 5-year period and sunset on January 1, 2025. Under this legislation, municipal and county agencies are restricted in ordinances and polices that can be applied to residential development. The revised definition of “Housing Development” now contains residential projects of two or more units, mixed-use projects (with two-thirds of the floor area designated for residential use), transitional, supportive, and emergency housing projects.
RESPONSES
a. Physically divide an established community?
b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the General Plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The proposed Project is located in the northwestern portion of the City of Porterville, in an area of residential and agricultural land uses. The proposed Project site is currently planted in orchards and has a residential home on the southern and eastern boundaries of the parcel.
The Project includes up to 233 single-family residential units on approximately 56 acres of land.
The Project has no characteristics that would physically divide the City of Porterville. Access to the existing surrounding areas will be improved with Project implementation.
The site is currently zoned AE-20 by Tulare County however it is within the Porterville Urban Development Boundary and prezoned in the City as RS-1 and designated by the General Plan as Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Parks & Recreation and Neighborhood Commercial.
As part of the Project, the site will be zoned Low Density Residential and the General Plan land use Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 77 changes will eliminate the Medium Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial and the designation will be amended to Low Density Residential. Project development and subsequent land use and zoning changes will not conflict with any land use plan, policy, regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating and environmental effect.
California Senate Bill 330 Housing Crisis Act of 2019 restricts the adoption of land use or zoning amendment that would result in a net loss in residential capacity. The current project site’s general plan land use designation of Low Density Residential with Medium Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial, and Parks and Recreation provides a residential maximum density of 336 units. The tentative subdivision proposes to amend the existing land uses to be converted to Low Density Residential. This change in zoning designation will increase the max density of the development to 339 Units, resulting in a gross gain in density.
With Project approval, the proposed Project will be consistent with Porterville 2030 General Plan objectives and policies and will not significantly conflict with applicable land use plans, policies or regulations of the City of Porterville.
No impacts would occur as a result of this Project.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 78 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of Porterville is situated along the western slope of a northwest-trending belt of rocks comprising the Sierra Nevada and within the southern portion of the Cascade Range. The Sierra Nevada geomorphic province is primarily composed of cretaceous granitic plutons and remnants of Paleozoic and Mesozoic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks, and Cenozoic volcan and sedimentary rocks.
The majority of the Planning Area has elevations ranging between 400 and 800 feet.
Historically, the quarrying of magnesite was a significant industry in the City of Porterville. Currently, the most economically significant mineral resources in Tulare County are sand, gravel, and crushed stone, used as sources for aggregate (road materials and other construction). The two major sources of aggregate are alluvial deposits (river beds, and floodplains), and hard rock quarries. Consequently, most Tulare County mines are located along rivers at the base of the Sierra foothills.
Tule River contains various State-classified mineral resource zones (MRZ-2a, MRZ-2b, and MRZ-3a).
While this area was once suitable for mining operations, it is now surrounded by urban development.
Approximately 890 acres along the Tule River, or 2.5 percent of all lands within the Planning Area, are within mineral resource zones. Tule River contains various State-classified mineral resource zones (MRZ2a, MRZ-2b, and MRZ-3a). While this area was once suitable for mining operations, it is now surrounded by urban development. Approximately 890 acres along the Tule River, or 2.5 percent of all lands within the Planning Area, are within mineral resource zones.
Regulatory Setting
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 79 There are no federal, state or local regulations pertaining to mineral resources relevant to the proposed Project.
RESPONSES
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
No Impact. As shown in Figure 6-3 of the 2030 General Plan, the proposed Project area is not included in a State classified mineral resource zones. Therefore, there is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. As shown in Figure 6-3 of the 2030 General Plan, the proposed Project area is not included in a State classified mineral resource zones. Soil disturbance for the proposed Project would be limited site ground work such as grading, foundations, and installation of infrastructure. Therefore, there is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 80 XIII. NOISE
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the project in
excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The Project site is located in the northwestern part of the City of Porterville and is currently planted in orchards, with a single-family residential home along the southern boundary, as well as the eastern boundary of the parcel. The site is located in an established area that provides a mix of land uses, including residential and agricultural.
The primary existing noise sources contributing to ambient noise in the proposed Project area are traffic noises and noises associated with neighborhoods and agriculture.
Regulatory Setting
Federal
The Federal Railway Administration (FRA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) have published guidance relative to vibration impacts. According to the FRA, fragile buildings can be exposed Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 81 to ground-borne vibration levels of 0.5 PPV without experiencing structural damage32. The FTA has identified the human annoyance response to vibration levels as 80 RMS.
State
The State Building Code, Title 24, Part 2 of the State of California Code of Regulations establishes uniform minimum noise insulation performance standards to protect persons within new buildings which house people, including hotels, motels, dormitories, apartment houses and dwellings other than single-family dwellings. Title 24 mandates that interior noise levels attributable to exterior sources shall not exceed 45 dB Ldn or CNEL in any habitable room.
Title 24 also mandates that for structures containing noise-sensitive uses to be located where the Ldn or CNEL exceeds 60 dB, an acoustical analysis must be prepared to identify mechanisms for limiting exterior noise to the prescribed allowable interior levels. If the interior allowable noise levels are met by requiring that windows be kept closed, the design for the structure must also specify a ventilation or air conditioning system to provide a habitable interior environment Local
Measuring and reporting noise levels involves accounting for variations in sensitivity to noise during the daytime versus nighttime hours. Noise descriptors used for analysis need to factor in human sensitivity to nighttime noise when background noise levels are generally lower than in the daytime and outside noise intrusions are more noticeable. Common descriptors include the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) and the Day-Night Average Level (Ldn). Both reflect noise exposure over an average day with weighting to reflect the increased sensitivity to noise during the evening and night. The two descriptors are roughly equivalent. The CNEL descriptor is used in relation to major continuous noise sources, such as aircraft or traffic, and is the reference level for the Noise Element under State planning law. The Noise Element included in the 2030 City of Porterville General Plan (2008) includes noise and land use compatibility standards for various land uses. These are shown in Table 6 below.
Table 6
Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environment
Land Use
Category
Community Noise Exposure, Ldn or CNEL dB
Normally
Acceptable
Conditionally
Acceptable
Normally
Unaccept
able
Clearly
Unacceptable
Residential –
Low density
single family,
duplex,
<65
(<45 Interior)
65 to 70 70 to 75 >75
(>45 Interior)
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 82 Land Use
Category
Community Noise Exposure, Ldn or CNEL dB
Normally
Acceptable
Conditionally
Acceptable
Normally
Unaccept
able
Clearly
Unacceptable
Residential
– Multiple
family
<65
(<45 Interior)
65 to 70 70 to 75 >75
(>45 Interior)
Schools, libraries,
churches,
hospitals, nursing
<70 60 to 75 70 to 80 >80
Industrial,
manufacturing,
utilities,
agriculture
<75 70 to 80 75 to 85 No
levels
identifie
d
Normally acceptable – Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction, without any special noise insulation requirements.
Conditionally acceptable – New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice.
Normally unacceptable – New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design.
Clearly unacceptable – New construction or development should generally not be undertaken.
Porterville General Plan Policies
• N-G-1: Minimize vehicular and stationary noise levels and noise from temporary activities. • N-G-2: Ensure that new development is compatible with the noise environment. • N-G-5: Reduce noise intrusion generated by miscellaneous noise sources through conditions of approval to control noise-generating activities. • N-I-7: Require noise from existing mechanical equipment to be reduced by soundproofing materials and sound-deadening installation.
RESPONSES
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than Significant Impact. According to the City’s General Plan EIR, the major noise sources in Porterville are related to roadways and vehicle traffic. As shown in Figure 9-2 of the City’s General Plan Noise Element, the Project site’s western boundary is exposed to the 55dB and 60 dB CNEL noise Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 83 contours, located along N. Westwood Street. Design features will be incorporated into the site plan to mitigate noise exposure to residences.
The site itself is located in an urban area adjacent to roadways that are potentially heavily travelled, particularly N. Westwood Street. Noise from the proposed Project will be similar to existing conditions and will generally include noise from vehicles, air conditioner units and other similar equipment. It is not expected that the proposed Project will result in a discernable increase in noise to surrounding land uses.
Proposed Project construction related activities will involve temporary noise sources. Typical construction related equipment include graders, trenchers, small tractors and excavators. During the proposed Project construction, noise from construction related activities will contribute to the noise environment in the immediate vicinity; however, the City of Porterville noise ordinance includes limiting construction activities to daytime hours and not allowing construction on certain holidays. The ordinance also restricts construction delivery trucks to daylight hours to avoid noise-sensitive hours of the day.
Activities involved in construction will generate maximum noise levels, as indicated in Table 7, ranging from 79 to 91 dBA at a distance of 50 feet, without feasible noise control (e.g., mufflers) and ranging from 75 to 80 dBA at a distance of 50 feet, with feasible noise controls.
Table 7
Typical Construction Noise Levels
Type of Equipment dBA at 50 ft
Without Feasible Noise Control With Feasible Noise
Dozer or Tractor 80 75
Excavator 88 80
Scraper 88 80
Front End Loader 79 75
Backhoe 85 75
Grader 85 75
Truck 91 75
The City of Porterville’s General Plan Noise Element (2008) sets the standard noise threshold of 60 dBA at the exterior of nearby residences; however, it does not identify a short-term, construction-noise-level threshold. The distinction between short-term construction noise impacts and long-term operational noise impacts is a typical one in both CEQA documents and local noise ordinances, which generally recognize the reality that short-term noise from construction is inevitable and cannot be mitigated beyond a certain level. Thus, local agencies frequently tolerate short-term noise at levels that they would not accept for permanent noise sources. A more severe approach would be impractical and might Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 84 preclude the kind of construction activities that are to be expected from time to time in urban environments. Most residents of urban areas recognize this reality and expect to hear construction activities on occasion.
Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground borne vibration are construction equipment, steelwheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. Construction vibrations can be transient, random, or continuous. Construction associated with the proposed Project includes the construction of residences and roadways.
The approximate threshold of vibration perception is 65 VdB, while 85 VdB is the vibration acceptable only if there are an infrequent number of events per day. Table 8 describes the typical construction equipment vibration levels.
Table 8
Typical Construction Vibration Levels
Equipment VdB at 25 ft
Small Bulldozer 58
Jackhammer 79
Vibration from construction activities will be temporary and not exceed the FTA threshold for the nearest residences, which are located approximately 50 feet from the development.
Impacts are less than significant.
Mitigation Measures:
None are required.
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The Project is not located within the Porterville Municipal Airport’s projected airport influence area. Therefore, there is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 85 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Induce substantial population growth in
an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
According to the Porterville 2030 General Plan, over the past 30 years, the City of Porterville’s population has grown at an average annual rate of 3.7 percent. However, the City’s population growth slowed to an average annual rate of 2.8 percent over the most recent 15 years. In 2006, the California Department of Finance (DOF) estimated the City with a population of 45,220 residents. In 2010, the City had an estimated population of 54,165 residents. In 2011 the City grew to 54,676 residents, while the City recorded an approximate population of 55,490 in 2012. According to the most recent California DOF report28, the City currently is at approximately 59,571 residents, a 7.35 percent increase from 2012. Buildout of the 2030 General Plan will accommodate a population of approximately 107,300 in Porterville, which represents an annual population growth rate of 3.7 percent.
Regulatory Setting
Federal
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) mission is to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities and quality affordable homes for all. HUD is working to strengthen the housing market to bolster the economy and protect consumers; meet the need for quality affordable 28 State of California Department of Finance. E-1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State – January 1, 2020 and 2021. https://www.dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-1/. Accessed May 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 86 rental homes: utilize housing as a platform for improving quality of life; build inclusive and sustainable communities free from discrimination; and transform the way HUD does business.29 State
The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD’s) mission is to “[p]rovide leadership, policies and programs to preserve and expand safe and affordable housing opportunities and promote strong communities for all Californians.”30 “In 1977, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) adopted regulations under the California Administrative Code, known as the Housing Element Guidelines, which are to be followed by local governments in the preparation of local housing elements. AB 2853, enacted in 1980, further codified housing element requirements. Since that time, new amendments to State Housing Law have been enacted.
State Housing Law also mandates that local governments identify existing and future housing needs in a Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
Local
City of Porterville Housing Element. California Housing Element law requires every jurisdiction to prepare and adopt a housing element as part of a City’s General Plan.
State Housing Element requirements are framed in the California Government Code, Sections 65580 through 65589, Chapter 1143, Article 10.6. The law requires the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to administer the law by reviewing housing elements for compliance with State law and by reporting its written findings to the local jurisdiction. Although State law allows local governments to decide when to update their general plans, State Housing Element law mandates that housing elements be updated every eight years. The City’s Housing Element was adopted in December of 2015, and contains information on housing needs, land inventory, constraints, and a program of action.
RESPONSES
29 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Mission, http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/about/mission. Accessed May 2021.
30 California Department of Housing and Community Development, Mission, http://www.hcd.ca.gov/mission.html. Accessed May 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 87 a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would include the construction of up to 233 singlefamily residences and internal access roads, which would result in approximately 790 additional residents based on the estimated 3.39 persons per household for the City of Porterville, which would increase the City’s population by approximately 1.5% at full buildout. The site is within the Porterville Planning Area of the General Plan and as such, residential site development is expected and has been planned for. Impacts are less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Less than Significant. There are two residential structures currently on-site; however, they will both remain after Project buildout. No houses will be displaced and as such, there will be no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 88 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities,
the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is in an area already served by public service systems. The nearest fire station is Porterville Fire Station 2, which is located at the Public Works complex, approximately 1.4 miles southeast of the proposed Project site. The physical address of the fire station is 500 North Newcomb Street. The Porterville Police Department is located approximately 3.0 miles southeast of the proposed Project site at 350 North D Street.
The Teapot Dome Landfill plant is approximately five miles southwest of the City limits, while the Porterville Wastewater Treatment Plant is located approximately 1.4 miles southeast of the site. Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus abuts the Project site to the north, William R. Buckley Elementary School is 0.3 miles southwest, Burton Middle School is one-half mile southwest, and Oak Grove Elementary School is 0.6 miles southeast of the Project site.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 89 Regulatory Setting
Federal
National Fire Protection Association
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) is an international nonprofit organization that provides consensus codes and standards, research, training, and education on fire prevention and public safety.
The NFPA develops, publishes, and disseminates more than 300 such codes and standards intended to minimize the possibility and effects of fire and other risks. The NFPA publishes the NFPA 1, Uniform Fire Code, which provides requirements to establish a reasonable level of fire safety and property protection in new and existing buildings.
State
California Fire Code and Building Code
The 2007 California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9 of the California Code of Regulations) establishes regulations to safeguard against hazards of fire, explosion, or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures, and premises. The Fire Code also establishes requirements intended to provide safety and assistance to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations. The provision of the Fire Code includes regulations regarding fire-resistance rated construction, fire protection systems such as alarm and sprinkler systems, fire service features such as fire apparatus access roads, fire safety during construction and demolition, and wildland urban interface areas.
In addition, the proposed Project is being evaluated pursuant to CEQA.
Local
Porterville General Plan Policies
• PHS-I-28: Ensure that new development incorporates safety concerns into the site, circulation, building design and landscaping plans.
RESPONSES
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 90 Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site will continue to be served by City of Porterville Fire Station No. 2, which is approximately 1.4 miles southeast of the proposed Project site. The Project applicant would be required to submit plans to the City Fire Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits to ensure the Project would conform to applicable building codes and would provide an on-site fire hydrant system in the event of an on-site fire. The Project would also include local roads that would provide access to emergency vehicles in the event of a fire and would connect to the larger circulation system to ensure adequate provision of emergency access to the Project site. As such, any impacts would be less than significant.
Police Protection?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project includes the construction of 233 singlefamily residential units and a neighborhood park, which will accommodate approximately 790 persons. Protection services would be provided to the Project site from the existing Porterville Police Department, approximately three miles to the southeast of the site. As the Project site is located in an area currently served by the Police Department and the site has been designated for urban use by the General Plan, the department would not need to expand its existing service area or construct a new facility to serve the Project site. The impact is less than significant.
Schools?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site is located within the Burton School District. The Project site is not within any elementary or middle school boundaries, but is within the Monache High School Boundary. Based on school district generation rates for new housing units (0.4 elementary, 0.1 middle school and 0.2 high school students per residential unit31), the proposed Project would generate approximately 104 elementary school students, 26 middle school students and 52 high school students.
Pursuant to California Education Code Section 17620(a)(1), the governing board of any school district is authorized to levy a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement against any construction within the boundaries of the district for the purpose of funding the construction or reconstruction of school facilities.
The Project applicant would be required to pay such fees to reduce any impacts of new residential development of school services. Payment of the developer fees will offset the addition of school-age children within the district. As such, any impacts would be less than significant.
Parks?
31 Porterville 2030 General Plan EIR. SCH 2006011033. Page 234.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 91 Less than Significant Impact. The nearest City park to the proposed Project site is Veterans Park, approximately 1.1 miles southeast on N. Newcomb Street and W. Henderson Avenue. Additionally, the tentative subdivision map includes a neighborhood park in the center of the new development, which would be approximately 152,214 square feet (3.49 acres) in size.
To ensure sufficient recreational opportunities, the City has established a Park Impact Fee, implemented by Chapter 19, Parks, Article III, Park Impact Fee, of the Municipal Code. The Municipal Code states that parks must be constructed or expanded commensurate with growth of the City. The developer will receive a credit against their park fees as a result of the City requirement to include a park in the residential development. Additionally, the Project applicant would be required to comply with Article III of the Municipal Code. As such, any impacts would remain less than significant.
Other public facilities?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project is within the Planning Area identified in the City’s General Plan. As such, the Project would not result in increased demand on other public facilities such as library services that has not already been planned for. Any impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 92 XVI. RECREATION
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of Porterville provides its residents several types of parks and recreational facilities. Parks are defined as land owned or leased by the City and used for public recreational purposes. The City classifies parks and recreational facilities in five categories: Pocket Parks, Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks, Specialized Recreation, and Trail/Parkways. Currently, the City of Porterville has 15 parks for a total of approximately 291 acres of parkland.
These facilities range in size from the 0.1-acre North Park pocket park up to the 95-acre Sports Complex facility. With a 2021 population of 59,571 residents32, the City has a ratio of 4.9 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. The park ratio is based on Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks, and Specialized Recreation areas only. Trails, Community Facilities and Pocket Parks do not contribute to the ratio.
Regulatory Setting
The proposed Project is being evaluated pursuant to CEQA; however, there are no additional federal, state or local regulations, plans, programs, and guidelines associated with recreation that are applicable to the proposed Project.
32 State of California Department of Finance. E-1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State – January 1, 2020 and 2021. https://www.dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-1/. Accessed May 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 93
RESPONSES
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less than Significant Impact. As described in Impact XIV(a), the City has established a Park Impact Fee through the Municipal Code, which states that parks must be constructed or expanded commensurate with growth of the City. The City requires the applicant to pay a Park Impact Fee, dedicate land for open space, or a combination of both. The applicant intends to construct a 152,214 square foot (3.49 acre) park in the center of the residential development. As such, any impacts will be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less than Significant Impact. As stated previously, the proposed Project includes the construction of recreation facilities (a community park) in the site development plan. The developer will receive a credit against their park fees as a result of the City requirement to include a park in the residential development.
As such, the payment of a Park Impact Fee as directed by the Municipal Code is likely not required. Less than significant impacts would occur.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 94 XVII. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed development is located on APN 245-010-087 and is bounded to the east by Westwood Street, to the west by Lombardi Street and to the south by Westfield Avenue. Residential subdivisions lie to the west, east, and south. Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus lies directly north, with a diagonal of the Friant-Kern Canal along the northwest corner. Porterville is bisected north-south by State Route (SR) 65 and SR 190 runs east-west in the southern portion of the City.
The nearest airport to the proposed Project site is the Porterville Municipal Airport, which is located approximately four miles south of the site.
Regulatory Setting
Federal
Federal Transit Administration.
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is an authority that provides financial and technical assistance to local public transit systems, including buses, subways, light rail, commuter rail, trolleys, and ferries.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 95 The FTA is funded by Title 49 of the United States Code, which states the FTA’s interest in fostering the development and revitalization of public transportation.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Titles I, II, III, IV, and V of the ADA have been codified in Title 42 of the United States Code, beginning at Section 12101. Title III prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in “places of public accommodation” (businesses and nonprofit agencies that serve the public) and “commercial facilities” (other businesses). The regulation includes Standards for Accessible Design, which establish minimum standards for ensuring accessibility when designing and constructing a new facility or altering an existing facility.State Senate Bill (SB) 743.
On September 27, 2013, Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 743 into law and codified a process that changed transportation impact analysis as part of CEQA compliance. SB 743 directs the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to administer new CEQA guidance for jurisdictions that removes automobile vehicle delay and LOS or other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestions from CEQA transportation analysis. Rather, it requires the analysis of VMT or other measures that “promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multi‐modal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses,” to be used as a basis for determining significant impacts to circulation in California. The goal of SB 743 is to appropriately balance the needs of congestion management with statewide goals related to reducing GHG emissions, encourage infill development, and promote public health through active transportation.
Local
The City of Porterville and the Tulare County Regional Transportation Plan designate level of service “D” as the minimum acceptable intersection peak hour level of service standard.
Porterville General Plan Policies
• C-G-6: Maintain acceptable levels of service and ensure that future development and the circulation system are in balance.
• C-G-7: Ensure that new development pays its fair share of the costs of transportation facilities. • C-I-12: Continue to require that new development pay a fair share of the costs of street and other traffic and local transportation improvements based on traffic generated and impacts on traffic service levels.
RESPONSES
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 96 a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Potentially Significant Impact. Project related traffic generation could potentially have significant impacts to local and regional transportation systems. Additionally, VMT generation could potentially conflict with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 and as such, these impact areas will be analyzed in the forthcoming EIR.
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Less than Significant Impact. No roadway design features associated with this proposed Project would result in an increase in hazards due to a design feature or be an incompatible use. There are five points of ingress/egress to the proposed Project site and each of these points will be sized appropriately for emergency vehicles. As such, the proposed Project has been appropriately designed for emergency access. Any impacts would be considered less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 97 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code section
21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of
the landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native
American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
ii. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of the Public
Resources Code section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 98
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Federal
The National Historic Preservation Act
The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) established federal regulations for the purpose of protecting significant cultural resources. The legislation established the National Register of Historic Places and the National Historic Landmarks Program. It mandated the establishment of the Office of Historic Preservation, responsible for implementing statewide historic preservation programs in each state.
State
California State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP)
The California State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) is responsible for administering federally and state mandated historic preservation programs to further the identification, evaluation, registration and protection of California's irreplaceable archaeological and historical resources under the direction of the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), appointed by the governor, and the State Historical Resources Commission, a nine-member state review board appointed by the governor.
Among OHP's responsibilities are identifying, evaluating, and registering historic properties; and ensuring compliance with federal and state regulations. The OHP administers the State Register of Historical Resources and maintains the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) database. The CHRIS database includes statewide Historical Resources Inventory (HRI) database. The records are maintained and managed under contract by eleven independent regional Information Centers. Tulare, Fresno, Kern, Kings and Madera counties are served by the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (Center), located in Bakersfield, CA. The Center provides information on known historic and cultural resources to governments, institutions and individuals.33 A historical resource may be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) if it:
Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage;
Is associated with the lives of persons important to our past; 33 California Office of Historic Preservation, Mission and Responsibilities, http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=1066, Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 99 Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.34 Tribal Consultation Requirements: SB 18 (Burton, 2004) 35 On September 29, 2004, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill 18, Tribal Consultation Guidelines, into law. This bill amended Section 815.3 of the Civil Code, to amend Sections 65040.2, 65092, 65351, 65352, and 65560 of, and to add Sections 65352.3, 65352.4, and 65562.2 to, the Government Code, relating to traditional tribal cultural Places. SB 18, enacted March 1, 2005, creates a mechanism for California Native American Tribes to identify culturally significant sites that are located within public or private lands within the city or county’s jurisdiction. SB 18 requires cities and counties to contact, and offer to consult with, California Native American Tribes before adopting or amending a General Plan, a Specific Plan, or when designating land as Open Space, for the purpose of protecting Native American Cultural Places (PRC 5097.9 and 5097.993). The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) provides local governments with a consultation list of tribal governments with traditional lands or cultural places located within the Project Area of Potential Effect. Tribes have 90 days from the date on which they receive notification to request consultation, unless a shorter timeframe has been agreed to by the tribe.
Tribal Consultation Requirements: AB 52 (Gatto, 2014)36 This bill was approved by Governor Brown on September 25, 2014 and became effective July 1, 2015. This bill amended Section 5097.94 of, and to add Sections 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2, and 21084.3 to, the Public Resources Code, relating to Native Americans. The bill specifies that a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, as defined, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. This bill requires a lead agency to begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated (can be a tribe anywhere within the State of California) with the geographic area of the proposed project, if the tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that geographic area and the tribe requests consultation, prior to determining whether a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is required for a project.
34 California Office of Historic Preservation, California Register of Historical Resources: Criteria for Designation. https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=21238. Accessed April 2021. 35 Senate Bill No. 18, Chapter 905. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=200320040SB18. Accessed April 2021. 36 Assembly Bill No. 52, Chapter 532. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB52, Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 100 Existing law establishes the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and vests the commission with specified powers and duties. This bill required the NAHC to provide each California Native American tribe, as defined, on or before July 1, 2016, with a list of all public agencies that may be a lead agency within the geographic area in which the tribe is traditionally and culturally affiliated, the contact information of those agencies, and information on how the tribe may request those public agencies to notify the tribe of projects within the jurisdiction of those public agencies for the purposes of requesting consultation.
The NAHC provides protection to Native American burials from vandalism and inadvertent destruction, provides a procedure for the notification of most likely descendants regarding the discovery of Native American human remains and associated grave goods, brings legal action to prevent severe and irreparable damage to sacred shrines, ceremonial sites, sanctified cemeteries and place of worship on public property, and maintains an inventory of sacred places.37 The NAHC performs a Sacred Lands File search for sites located on or near the Project site upon request.
The NAHC also provides local governments with a consultation list of tribal governments with traditional lands or cultural places located within the Project Area of Potential Effect. The City sent letters to the tribal governments listed by the NAHC on April 29, 2021 as required by AB 52.
Local
Porterville General Plan Policies
• OSC-I-72: Develop an agreement with Native American representatives for consultation in the cases where new development may result in disturbance to Native American sites.
RESPONSES
a-i, a-ii. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k) or a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of the 37 Native American Heritage Commission, About the Native American Heritage Commission http://nahc.ca.gov/about/. Accessed April 2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 101 Public Resources Code section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
Less than Significant Impact. A Tribal Cultural Resource (TCR) is defined under Public Resources Code section 21074 as a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of size and scope, sacred place, and object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included and that is listed or eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources or in a local register of historical resources, or if the City of Porterville, acting as the Lead Agency, supported by substantial evidence, chooses at its discretion to treat the resource as a TCR. As discussed above, under Section V, Cultural Resources, criteria (b) and (d), no known archeological resources, ethnographic sites or Native American remains are located on the proposed Project site. As discussed under criterion (b) implementation of Mitigation Measure CULT-1 would reduce impacts to unknown archaeological deposits, including TCRs, to a less than significant level. As discussed under criterion (d), compliance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 would reduce the likelihood of disturbing or discovering human remains, including those of Native Americans. Any impacts to TCR would be considered less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No additional measures are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 102 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project’s
projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the attainment of solid
waste reduction goals?
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
g. Comply with federal, state, and local
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 103
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Utilities required to serve the proposed Project would include: water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, electricity, and telecommunications infrastructure. Water service, sewage disposal and refuse collection would be provided by the City of Porterville.
Regulatory Setting
State
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
Waste Discharge Requirements Program. State regulations pertaining to the treatment, storage, processing, or disposal of solid waste are found in Title 27, CCR, Section 20005 et seq. (hereafter Title 27).
In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 2744. Several SWRCB programs are administered under the WDR Program, including the Sanitary Sewer Order and recycled water programs.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit As authorized by the Clean Water Act (CWA), the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NDPES) Permit Program controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into waters of the United States. In California, it is the responsibility of Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) to preserve and enhance the quality of the state's waters through the development of water quality control plans and the issuance of waste discharge requirements (WDRs). WDRs for discharges to surface waters also serve as NPDES permits. Tulare County is within the Central Valley RWQCB's jurisdiction.
In addition, the proposed Project is being evaluated pursuant to CEQA.
Local
• Porterville General Plan PoliciesOSC-I-44: Work with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to ensure that all point source pollutants are adequately mitigated (as part of the CEQA review and project approval process) and monitored to ensure long-term compliance.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 104 • OSC-I-51: Prior to the approval of individual projects, require the City Engineer and/or Building Official to verify that the provisions of applicable point source pollution programs have been satisfied.
RESPONSES
a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed Project would include up to 233 singlefamily residential units on the Project site. The Project site is located within the service territory of the Porterville Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). Since the WWTF is considered a publicly owned treatment works, operational discharge flows treated at the WWTF would be required to comply with applicable water discharge requirements issued by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Compliance with conditions or permit requirements established by the City as well as water discharge requirements outlined by the Central Valley RWQCB would ensure that wastewater discharges coming from the proposed Project site and treated by the WWTF system would not exceed applicable Central Valley RWQCB wastewater treatment requirements.
As discussed in Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality, with an increase in the area of impervious surfaces on the Project site, an increase in the amount of storm water runoff is anticipated. The site will be designed so that storm water is collected and deposited in the City’s existing storm drain system. The storm water collection system design will be subject to review and approval by the City Public Works Department. Storm water during construction will be managed as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the SWPPP is retained on-site during construction. Thus, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Less than Significant Impact. See Section X – Hydrology for a full discussion pertaining to available water supply. The site is designated and zoned for urban development and has been accounted for in the General Plan and other infrastructure planning documents. The site land use designation is currently Medium Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial. As a part of the Project, land use will be Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 105 redesignated as Low Density Residential, which is a less intensive use than what was analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
The City will have sufficient supply to serve the proposed Project and as such, the proposed Project will have a less than significant impact.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section XVIII(a), implementation of the proposed Project would result in the need for additional wastewater treatment service; however, the proposed development was accounted for in the General Plan and the land use changes proposed as a part of the project will result in a less intensive use than what was planned. In addition, as acknowledged in the General Plan, the City will begin planning for additional WWTF capacity to accommodate growth and development allowed under the General Plan when the influent flow reaches 6.4 million gallons per day (MGD). Currently, flows average 4.5 MGD.38 Additionally, the proposed Project applicant would be required to comply with any applicable City and WWTF regulations and would be subject to applicable development impact fees and wastewater connection charges. Therefore, with compliance to applicable standards and payment of required fees and connection charges, the Project would not result in a significant impact related to construction or expansions of existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less than Significant Impact. Disposal services in the City are provided by the City of Porterville. As of 2004, the City’s solid waste was disposed at Teapot Dome landfill, located approximately five miles southwest of the City limits. Teapot Dome is a County-operated Class III landfill permitted to discharge up to 300 tons per day. As of 2004, the landfill was at 84.7 percent capacity with a remaining capacity of 38 Michael Knight, City of Porterville Public Works Director, email communication.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 106 998,468 cubic yards. According to the City’s General Plan, once Teapot Dome landfill reaches capacity, the City anticipates using its transfer facility to divert waste to the Visalia landfill.
The Visalia Disposal Site, located approximately 35 miles northwest of the City limits, is a Countyoperated Class III landfill permitted to discharge up to 2,000 tons a day. As of 2017, there was approximately 18,000,000 cubic yards of capacity with an expected closure date of 2049.39 The estimated closure date is considered to be worst case scenario, where diversion goals are not met.
Pena Disposal accepts all the recyclables for the City. This processing and transfer facility is approximately 35 miles from City limits and is permitted for unlimited recycling, 2,000 tons per day of mixed solid waste, 100 tons per day of yard waste and 175 tons per day of construction and demolition waste. Most household hazardous wastes, including e-waste, must be taken to various sites in Visalia, except on the biannual clean-up days when the County sets up a drop-off site in Porterville.
According to the General Plan, solid waste generation rates in Porterville are approximately 2.0 pounds per day per resident. Therefore, the proposed Project would include the development of 233 residential units resulting in a population increase of approximately 790 persons, generating approximately 1,580 pounds per day of solid waste.
Implementation of the proposed Project would result in an increase in solid waste disposal needs; however, this increase would be minimal and, as indicated in the General Plan, the County anticipates the available landfill capacity will be sufficient through 2030. The proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to solid waste and landfill facilities.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
e. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less than Significant Impact. See Response f, above. The proposed Project would be required to comply with all federal, State, and local regulations related to solid waste. Furthermore, the proposed Project would be required to comply with all standards related to solid waste diversion, reduction, and recycling during Project construction and operation. The proposed Project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. As such, any impacts would be less than significant. 39 Jonah Trevino, Environmental Coordinator for Tulare County Solid Waste Department. Personal communication on 6/24/2021.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 107 Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 108 XX. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power
lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the environment?
d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Human activities such as smoking, debris burning, and equipment operation are the major causes of wildland fires. Within Tulare County, over 1,029,130 acres (33% of the total area) are classified as “Very High” fire threat and approximately 454,680 acres (15% of the total area) are classified as “High” fire threat. The portion of the county that transitions from the valley floor into the foothills and mountains is characterized by high to very high threat of wildland fires.40 The majority of the Porterville is developed into urban uses or in active agriculture, severely reducing the risk of wildland fire. According to the 40 Tulare County General Plan Background Report. February 2010. Page 8-21.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 109 Tulare County Background Report Figure 8-2, the majority of the City has no threat of wildfire. The proposed Project site is relatively flat in an area actively utilized with primarily residential and agricultural uses.
RESPONSES
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project is located in an area developed with residential and agricultural uses, which precludes the risk of wildfire. The area is flat in nature which would limit the risk of downslope flooding and landslides, and limit any wildfire spread.
To receive building permits, the proposed Project would be required to be in compliance with the adopted emergency response plan. As such, any wildfire risk to the project structures or people would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 110 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
RESPONSES
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 111 the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Potentially Significant Impact. The analyses of environmental issues contained in this Initial Study indicate that the proposed Project may have substantial impact on the environment or on any resources identified in the Initial Study. Mitigation measures have been incorporated in the project design, however some impacts remain potentially significant. Therefore, an EIR will be prepared for those impact areas.
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
Potentially Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(i) states that a Lead Agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact of a project is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. The assessment of the significance of the cumulative effects of a project must, therefore, be conducted in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects. The proposed Project may contribute substantially to adverse cumulative conditions, or create any substantial indirect impacts (i.e., increase in population could lead to an increase need for housing, increase in traffic, air pollutants, etc). Mitigation measures have been incorporated in the project design, however some impacts remain potentially significant. Therefore, an EIR will be prepared for those impact areas.
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Potentially Significant Impact. The analyses of environmental issues contained in this Initial Study indicate that the project may have substantial impact on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
Mitigation measures have been incorporated in the project design, however some impacts remain potentially significant. Therefore, an EIR will be prepared for those impact areas Lombardi Development Project | Initial Study
CITY OF PORTERVILLE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 112
LIST OF PREPARERS
Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
• Emily Bowen, LEED AP, Principal Environmental Planner • Travis Crawford, AICP, Principal Environmental Planner • Caroline Gibbons, Assistant Planner
Persons and Agencies Consulted
City of Porterville
• Troy Andres, Assistant Planner
• Jeff O’Neal, Contract City Planner
• Julie Phillips, Community Developer Manager
• Jason Ridenour, Acting Community Development Director California Historic Resources Information System
• Celeste Thomson, Coordinator
Appendix A
CHRIS Search Results
To: Emily Bowen Record Search 21-119
Crawford Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 302
Visalia, CA 93291
Date: April 5, 2021
Re: City of Porterville Lombardi Residential Development Project County: Tulare
Map(s): Porterville 7.5’
CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH
The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.
The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include known and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, and resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historical Resources, California Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the OHP are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.
PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS
According to the information in our files, there have been no previous cultural resource studies conducted within the project area. There have been three cultural resource studies conducted within a onehalf mile radius, TU-00102, 00258, and 01467.
Record Search 21-119
KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS There are no recorded resources within the project area, and it is not known if any exist there. There is one recorded resource within the one-half mile radius, P-54-004614, the Friant-Kern Canal.
Resource P-54-004614, the Friant Kern Canal, has been given a National Register Status Code of 2S2, indicating it has been determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places by a consensus through the Section 106 process. It is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources. There are no other recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand this project consists of a residential development project including the development of 241 single family residential units and a 2-acre park to support the development. Further, we understand the project area is currently used for agricultural purposes. Please note that agriculture does not constitute previous development, as it does not destroy cultural resources, but merely moves them around within the plow zone. Because a cultural resources study has not been conducted on this property, it is unknown if any cultural resources are present. Therefore, prior to ground disturbance activities, we recommend a qualified, professional consult conduct a field survey to determine if any cultural resources are present. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.
We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will provide you with a current list of Native American individuals/organizations that can assist you with information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native groups in the area. The Commission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any, exist within this project area and the way in which these resources might be managed. Finally, please consult with the lead agency on this project to determine if any other cultural resource investigation is required. If you need any additional information or have any questions or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.
By:
Celeste M. Thomson, Coordinator Date: April 5, 2021
Please note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.
NOP Comments Received
State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Central Region
1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, California 93710
(559) 243-4005
www.wildlife.ca.gov
Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870
August 23, 2021
Jason Ridenour
City of Porterville
291 N. Main Street
Porterville, California 93257
Subject: Lombardi Development Project
Notice of Preparation (NOP)
SCH No.: 2021070158
Dear Mr. Ridenour:
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received a NOP for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) from the City of Porterville, as Lead Agency, for the Project pursuant the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines.1 Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife. Likewise, CDFW appreciates the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code. While the comment period may have ended, CDFW would appreciate if you will still consider our comments.
CDFW ROLE
CDFW is California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State (Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a)). CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (Id., § 1802). Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on projects and related activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources.
CDFW is also submitting comments as a Responsible Agency under CEQA (Pub.
Resources Code, § 21069; CEQA Guidelines, § 15381). CDFW expects that it may need to exercise regulatory authority as provided by the Fish and Game Code. As proposed, for
1 CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21000 et seq. The “CEQA Guidelines” are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with section 15000.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
example, the Project may be subject to CDFW’s lake and streambed alteration regulatory authority (Fish & G. Code, § 1600 et seq.). Likewise, to the extent implementation of the Project as proposed may result in “take” as defined by State law of any species protected under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.), related authorization as provided by the Fish and Game Code will be required.
Nesting Birds: CDFW has jurisdiction over actions with potential to result in the disturbance or destruction of active nest sites or the unauthorized take of birds. Fish and Game Code sections that protect birds, their eggs and nests include, sections 3503 (regarding unlawful take, possession or needless destruction of the nest or eggs of any bird), 3503.5 (regarding the take, possession or destruction of any birds-of-prey or their nests or eggs), and 3513 (regarding unlawful take of any migratory nongame bird).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY
Proponent: San Joaquin Valley Homes
Objective: The Project consists of an Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the construction of up to 233 single-family residential units on 56 acres and the annexation of the Summit Charter Academy, Lombardi Campus, totaling approximately 69.65 acres
Location: The Project site is located between N. Westwood Street and N. Lombardi Street, bounded to the south by W. Westfield Avenue, in Porterville.
Timeframe: Unspecified
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist the City of Porterville in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, direct and indirect impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources. Editorial comments or other suggestions may also be included to improve the CEQA document.
The Project area is within the geographic range of several special-status animal species.
Of particular concern to CDFW are the State threatened Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), and tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), and the Species of Special Concern burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), because potential habitat features exist on or adjacent to the Project site. As such, CDFW requests that the EIR fully identify potential impacts to these species and evaluate if they may be significant. In order to adequately assess any potential impact to biological resources, focused biological surveys conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist during the appropriate survey period(s) may be necessary to determine whether these species or their habitat may be present within the Project area. Information from these surveys may also be necessary to identify any mitigation, minimization, and avoidance measures and/or the need for additional or protocol level surveys, and to identify DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
any Project-related impacts under CESA and other species of concern. CDFW has the following recommendations.
I. Environmental Setting and Related Impact
Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)?
COMMENT 1: Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni; SWHA)
Issue: SWHA have been documented in the Project vicinity (CDFW 2021) and have the potential to occur in the Project area. Landscape trees may also provide suitable nesting habitat. In addition, grassland and agricultural land in the surrounding area provide suitable foraging habitat for SWHA, increasing the likelihood of SWHA occurrence within the vicinity. SWHA have the potential to nest and forage near the Project site. Based on aerial photography, the proposed Project area appears to include large, mature trees that may serve as potential nest sites and ruderal grasslands, fallow fields, and some agricultural crops that occur in the Project vicinity may serve as foraging habitat.
Specific impact: Without appropriate avoidance and minimization measures for SWHA, potential significant impacts that may result from Project activities include: nest abandonment, loss of nest trees, loss of foraging habitat that would reduce nesting success (loss or reduced health or vigor of eggs or young), and direct mortality. All trees, including non-native or ornamental varieties, near the Project site may provide potential nesting sites.
Evidence impact would be significant: SWHA exhibit high nest-site fidelity year after year and lack of suitable nesting habitat in the San Joaquin Valley limits their local distribution and abundance (CDFW 2016). Approval of the Project may lead to subsequent ground-disturbing activities that involve noise, groundwork, construction of structures, and movement of workers that could affect nests and has the potential to result in nest abandonment and loss of foraging habitat, significantly impacting local nesting SWHA.
Recommended Potentially Feasible Mitigation Measure(s)
To evaluate potential impacts to SWHA associated with Project activities, CDFW recommends conducting the following evaluation of Project areas and implementing the following mitigation measures as enforceable conditions in the EIR.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
Recommended Mitigation Measure 1: Focused SWHA Surveys
To evaluate potential Project-related impacts, CDFW recommends that a qualified wildlife biologist conduct surveys for nesting SWHA following the entire survey methodology developed by the SWHA Technical Advisory Committee (SWHA TAC 2000) prior to Project implementation within 0.5-mile from the limits of Projectassociated disturbance.
Recommended Mitigation Measure 2: SWHA Avoidance
CDFW recommends that if Project-specific activities will take place during the SWHA nesting season (i.e., March 1 through September 15), and active SWHA nests are present, a minimum 0.5-mile no-disturbance buffer be delineated and maintained around each nest, regardless if when it was detected by surveys or incidentally, until the breeding season has ended or until a qualified biologist has determined that the birds have fledged and are no longer reliant upon the nest or parental care for survival, to prevent nest abandonment and unauthorized take of SWHA as a result of Project activities.
Recommended Mitigation Measure 3: SWHA Take Authorization CDFW recommends that in the event an active SWHA nest is detected, and a 0.5-mile no-disturbance buffer is not feasible, consultation with CDFW is warranted to discuss how to implement the project and avoid take. If take cannot be avoided, take authorization through the acquisition of an Incidental Take Permit (ITP), pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 2081 subdivision (b) is necessary to comply with CESA.
Recommended Mitigation Measure 4: SWHA Tree Removal
CDFW recommends that the removal of known SWHA nest trees, even outside of the nesting season, be replaced with an appropriate native tree species planting at a ratio of 3:1 at or near the Project area or in another area that will be protected in perpetuity.
This mitigation would offset the local and temporal impacts of nesting habitat loss.
COMMENT 2: Tricolored Blackbird (TRBL)
Issue: TRBL colonies require suitable nesting habitat, nearby freshwater, and nearby foraging habitat including grasslands, low-growing agricultural croplands (e.g., alfalfa, irrigated pastures, cut grain fields such as silage), or alkali scrub (Beedy et al. 2017).
Specific impact: Without appropriate avoidance and minimization measures for TRBL, potential significant impacts associated with Project activities include nest and/or colony abandonment, reduced reproductive success, and reduced health and vigor of eggs and/or young.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
Evidence impact would be significant: The Project site has the potential to contain elements that have the potential to support TRBL nesting colonies. TRBL aggregate and nest colonially, forming colonies of up to 100,000 nests (Beedy et al. 2017). This species has been steadily declining due to annual breeding losses due to cropharvesting activities, insufficient insect resources, and habitat loss due to land conversion for agriculture, rangeland, and urban development (Beedy et al. 2017).
Recommended Potentially Feasible Mitigation Measure(s)
To evaluate potential Project-related impacts to TRBL, CDFW recommends conducting the following evaluation of the Project site and including the following measures in the EIR if suitable habitat is present.
Recommended Mitigation Measure 5: Habitat Assessment
If the Project site contains fallow agricultural fields, ruderal grasslands, or other low growing vegetation, CDFW recommends that a qualified biologist conduct a habitat assessment in advance of Project implementation, to determine if the Project site or its immediate vicinity contains suitable habitat for TRBL.
Recommended Mitigation Measure 6: TRBL Surveys
If suitable habitat is present, CDFW recommends that Project activities be timed to avoid the normal bird breeding season (February 1 through September 15). However, if Project activities must take place during that time, CDFW recommends that a qualified wildlife biologist conduct surveys for nesting TRBL no more than 10 days prior to the start of implementation to evaluate presence/absence of TRBL nesting colonies in proximity to Project activities and to evaluate potential Project-related impacts.
Recommended Mitigation Measure 7: TRBL Avoidance
If an active TRBL nesting colony is found during preconstruction surveys, CDFW recommends implementation of a minimum 300-foot no-disturbance buffer in accordance with CDFW’s “Staff Guidance Regarding Avoidance of Impacts to Tricolored Blackbird Breeding Colonies on Agriculture Fields in 2015” (CDFW 2015). CDFW advises that this buffer remain in place until the breeding season has ended or until a qualified biologist has determined that nesting has ceased, the birds have fledged, and are no longer reliant upon the colony or parental care for survival. It is important to note that TRBL colonies can expand over time and for this reason, the colony should be reassessed to determine the extent of the breeding colony within 10 days for Project initiation.
Recommended Mitigation Measure 8: TRBL Take Authorization If a TRBL nesting colony is detected during surveys, consultation with CDFW is warranted to discuss how to implement the Project and avoid take, or if avoidance is not DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
feasible, to acquire an ITP, pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 2081 subdivision (b), prior to any ground-disturbing activities.
COMMENT 3: Burrowing Owl (BUOW)
Issue: BUOW may occur within and/or adjacent to the Project site if suitable small mammal burrows are present. BUOW may inhabit small mammal burrows, a requisite habitat feature used by BUOW for nesting and cover, adjacent to open grasslands, ROWs, vacant lots, low-growing crops, etc., where they can find suitable foraging habitat.
Specific impact: Potentially significant direct impacts associated with subsequent activities and development include burrow collapse, inadvertent entrapment, nest abandonment, reduced reproductive success, reduction in health and vigor of eggs and/or young, and direct mortality of individuals.
Evidence impact is potentially significant: BUOW rely on burrow habitat year-round for their survival and reproduction. Habitat loss and degradation are considered the greatest threats to BUOW in California’s Central Valley (Gervais et al. 2008). The Project site is bordered by some of the only remaining habitat in the vicinity, which is otherwise urban or intensively managed for agriculture. Therefore, subsequent grounddisturbing activities associated with the Project have the potential to significantly impact local BUOW populations. In addition, and as described in CDFW’s “Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation” (CDFG 2012), excluding and/or evicting BUOW from their burrows is considered a potentially significant impact under CEQA.
Recommended Potentially Feasible Mitigation Measure(s) (Regarding Environmental Setting and Related Impact)
To evaluate potential impacts to BUOW, CDFW recommends conducting the following evaluation of the subject parcel and implementing the following mitigation measures.
Recommended Mitigation Measure 9: BUOW Surveys
If small mammal burrows are present within the Project site, CDFW recommends assessing presence/absence of BUOW by having a qualified biologist conduct surveys following the California Burrowing Owl Consortium’s “Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines” (CBOC 1993) and CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation” (CDFG 2012). Specifically, if suitable habitat is present at an individual Project site, CBOC and CDFW’s Staff Report suggest three or more surveillance surveys conducted during daylight with each visit occurring at least three weeks apart during the peak breeding season (April 15 to July 15), when BUOW are most detectable.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
Recommended Mitigation Measure 10: BUOW Avoidance
CDFW recommends no-disturbance buffers, as outlined in the “Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation” (CDFG 2012), be implemented prior to and during any ground-disturbing activities. Specifically, CDFW’s Staff Report recommends that impacts to occupied burrows be avoided in accordance with the following table unless a qualified biologist approved by CDFW verifies through non-invasive methods that either:
1) the birds have not begun egg laying and incubation; or 2) that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.
Recommended Mitigation Measure 11: BUOW Passive Relocation and Mitigation If BUOW are found within these recommended buffers and avoidance is not possible, it is important to note that according to the Staff Report (CDFG 2012), exclusion is not a take avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and is considered a potentially significant impact under CEQA. However, if necessary, CDFW recommends that burrow exclusion be conducted by qualified biologists and only during the non-breeding season, before breeding behavior is exhibited and after the burrow is confirmed empty through non-invasive methods, such as surveillance. CDFW recommends replacement of occupied burrows with artificial burrows at a ratio of 1 burrow collapsed to 1 artificial burrow constructed (1:1) as mitigation for the potentially significant impact of evicting BUOW. BUOW may attempt to colonize or re-colonize an area that will be impacted; thus, CDFW recommends ongoing surveillance, at a rate that is sufficient to detect BUOW if they return.
II. Editorial Comments and/or Suggestions
Nesting Birds: CDFW has jurisdiction over actions with potential to result in the disturbance or destruction of active nest sites or the unauthorized take of birds. Fish and Game Code sections that protect birds, their eggs and nests include sections 3503 (regarding unlawful take, possession or needless destruction of the nest or eggs of any bird), 3503.5 (regarding the take, possession or destruction of any birds-of-prey or their nests or eggs), and 3513 (regarding unlawful take of any migratory nongame bird).
CDFW encourages Project implementation to occur during the bird non-nesting season; however, if Project activities must occur during the breeding season (i.e., February through mid-September), the Project applicant is responsible for ensuring that implementation of the DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
Project does not result in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or relevant Fish and Game Codes as referenced above.
To evaluate Project-related impacts on nesting birds, CDFW recommends that a qualified wildlife biologist conduct pre-activity surveys for active nests no more than 10 days prior to the start of ground disturbance to maximize the probability that nests that could potentially be impacted by the Project are detected. CDFW also recommends that surveys cover a sufficient area around the work site to identify nests and determine their status. A sufficient area means any area potentially affected by a project. In addition to direct impacts (i.e., nest destruction), noise, vibration, and movement of workers or equipment could also affect nests. Prior to initiation of construction activities, CDFW recommends that a qualified biologist conduct a survey to establish a behavioral baseline of all identified nests. Once construction begins, CDFW recommends that a qualified biologist continuously monitor nests to detect behavioral changes resulting from the project. If behavioral changes occur, CDFW recommends that the work causing that change cease and CDFW be consulted for additional avoidance and minimization measures.
If continuous monitoring of identified nests by a qualified wildlife biologist is not feasible, CDFW recommends a minimum no-disturbance buffer of 250 feet around active nests of non-listed bird species and a 500-foot no-disturbance buffer around active nests of non-listed raptors. These buffers are advised to remain in place until the breeding season has ended or until a qualified biologist has determined that the birds have fledged and are no longer reliant upon the nest or parental care for survival. Variance from these no-disturbance buffers is possible when there is compelling biological or ecological reason to do so, such as when the construction area would be concealed from a nest site by topography. CDFW recommends that a qualified wildlife biologist advise and support any variance from these buffers and notify CDFW in advance of implementing a variance.
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database, which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e)).
Accordingly, please report any special-status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to the CNDDB. The CNDDB field survey form can be found at the following link: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data. The completed form can be mailed electronically to CNDDB at the following email address:
[email protected]. The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals.
FILING FEES
The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
Payment of the fee is required for the underlying project approval to be operative, vested, and final (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089).
CONCLUSION
CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the NOP to assist the City of Porterville in identifying and mitigating Project impacts on biological resources.
If you have any questions, please contact Jaime Marquez, Environmental Scientist, at the address provided on this letterhead, or by electronic mail at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Julie A. Vance
Regional Manager
Attachment 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
REFERENCES
Beedy, E. C., W. J. Hamilton III, R. J. Meese, D. A. Airola, and P. Pyle. 2017. Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), version 3.0. in The birds of North America. P. G.
California Burrowing Owl Consortium (CBOC). 1993. Burrowing owl survey protocol and mitigation guidelines. April 1993.
California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 1994. Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson’s Hawks (Buteo Swainsoni) in the Central Valley of California. California Department of Fish and Game.
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=83992&inline CDFG. 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. California Department of Fish and Game.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2015. Staff Guidance Regarding Avoidance of Impacts to Tricolored Blackbird Breeding Colonies on Agricultural Fields in 2015. March 19, 2015.
CDFW. 2016. Five Year Status Review for Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni). California Department of Fish and Wildlife. April 11, 2016.
CDFW. 2021. Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS). https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/BIOS. Accessed August 5, 2021.
Gervais, J.A., D.D. Rosenberg, and L.A. Comrack. Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) in Shuford, W.D. and T. Gardali, editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern.
Kelsey, R. 2008. Results of the tricolored blackbird 2008 census. Report submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR, USA.
Meese, R. J., E.C. Beedy, and W.J. Hamilton, III. 2014. Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), The Birds of North America (P. G. Rodewald, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America: https://birdsnaorg.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/Species-Account/bna/species/tribla. Accessed April 20, 2021.
Orians, G.H. 1961. The ecology of blackbird (Agelaius) social systems. Ecol. Monogr. 31:285-312.
Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory Committee (SWHA TAC), 2000. Recommended Timing and Methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in the Central Valley of California. Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory Committee. May 31, 2000.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 Jason Ridenor
City of Porterville
August 23, 2021
Weintraub, K., T.L. George, and S.J. Dinsmore. 2016. Nest survival of tricolored blackbirds in California’s Central Valley. The Condor 118(4): 850–861.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071 1 Rev. 2013.1.1
Attachment 1
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP)
FOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: Lombardi Development Project
SCH No.: 2021070158
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION
MEASURE
STATUS/DATE/INITIALS
Before Disturbing Soil or Vegetation
Mitigation Measure 1: Focused SWHA Surveys
Mitigation Measure 3: SWHA Take Authorization
Mitigation Measure 5: TRBL Habitat Assessment
Mitigation Measure 6: TRBL Surveys
Mitigation Measure 8: TRBL Take Authorization
Mitigation Measure 9: BUOW Surveys
Mitigation Measure 11: BUOW Passive Relocation
and Mitigation
During Construction
Mitigation Measure 2: SWHA Avoidance
Mitigation Measure 4: SWHA Tree Removal
Mitigation Measure 7: TRBL Avoidance
Mitigation Measure 10: BUOW Avoidance
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9FD35819-51A0-40AE-A856-C66B3F9DB071
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778-2616 (559) 981-1041 | FAX (559) 488-4195 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
September 9, 2021
TUL-65-20.85
NOP
LOMBARDI SUBDIVISION
GTS #: 32963
SENT VIA EMAIL
Mr. Jason Ridenour, Director
Community Development Department
City of Porterville,
291 N. Main Street.
Porterville CA, 93257
Dear Mr. Ridenour:
Caltrans has completed a planning level review of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for a Draft Environmental Impact Study (EIR). The Project consists of an Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the construction of up to 233 single-family residential units on 56-acres. The annexation also includes the existing Summit Charter Academy - Lombardi Campus, which brings the total annexation to approximately 69.65 acres.
The Project site location is on the north west corner of Lombardi Street and Westfield Avenue, approximately 2 miles east of the SR 65/Westfield overcrossing and approximately 3 miles north of the SR 190/Westwood intersection, in the City of Porterville.
The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment. To ensure a safe and efficient transportation system, we encourage early consultation and coordination with local jurisdictions and project proponents on all development projects that utilize the multimodal transportation network.
Caltrans provides the following comments consistent with the State’s smart mobility goals that support a vibrant economy and sustainable communities:
1. Caltrans anticipates the project would have a minor impact to the State Highway System namely SR 65 or SR 190, based on the information in the NOP.
2. The proposed project appears to induce the vehicle miles travel (VMT) in the surrounding vicinity. We recommended that the City considering a multimodal Mr. Jason Ridenour – NOP - LOMBARDI SUBDIVISION
September 9, 2021
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” transportation system (such as bicycle and pedestrian facilities as well as public transportation) to provide connectivity mode between the residential areas to commercial/retail areas to reduce the VMT induced by the project.
3. Alternative transportation policies should be applied to the development. An assessment of multi-modal facilities should be conducted to develop an integrated multi-modal transportation system to serve and help alleviate traffic congestion caused by the project and related development in this area of the City or County.
The assessment should include the following:
a. Pedestrian walkways should link this proposal to an internal project area walkway, transit facilities, as well as other walkways in the surrounding area. b. The Project might also consider coordinating connections to local and regional bicycle pathways to further encourage the use of bicycles for commuter and recreational purposes.
c. If transit is not available within ¼-mile of the site, transit should be extended to provide services to what will be a high activity center.
4. Active Transportation Plans and Smart Growth efforts support the state’s 2050 Climate goals. Caltrans supports reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Green House Gas (GHG) emissions in ways that increase the likelihood people will use and benefit from a multimodal transportation network.
5. Based on Caltrans VMT-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide, dated May 20, 2020 and effective as of July 1, 2020, Caltrans seeks to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips, provide a safe transportation system, reduce per capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), increase accessibility to destinations via cycling, walking, carpooling, transit and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Caltrans recommends that the project proponent continue to work with the City or County to further implement improvements to reduce vehicles miles traveled and offer a variety of transportation modes for its employees.
If you have any other questions, please call me at (559) 981-1041.
Sincerely,
DAVID DEEL
Associate Transportation Planner
Transportation Planning – South
Gavin Newsom, Governor
David Shabazian, Director
State of California Natural Resources Agency | Department of Conservation 801 K Street, MS 14-15, Sacramento, CA 95814
conservation.ca.gov | T: (916) 324-0850 | F: (916) 327-3430 August 9, 2021
VIA EMAIL: [email protected]
Jason Ridenour
Community Development Director
City of Porterville
291 N. Main Street
Porterville, CA 93257
Dear Mr. Ridenour:
INITIAL STUDY/NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE LOMBARDI DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, SCH#2021070158
The Department of Conservation’s (Department) Division of Land Resource Protection (Division) has reviewed the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Lombardi Development Project (Project). The Division monitors farmland conversion on a statewide basis, provides technical assistance regarding the Williamson Act, and administers various agricultural land conservation programs. We offer the following comments and recommendations with respect to the project’s potential impacts on agricultural land and resources.
Project Description
The proposed Project consists of an Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Rezone and a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the construction of up to 233 single-family residential units. Parcels to be annexed include 245-010-087, -092, -037 and -041 for a total of approximately 69.65 acres. The 56-acre subdivision would be developed on Assessor Parcel Number 245-010-087. The Project site is located between N. Westwood Street and N. Lombardi Street, bounded to the south by W. Westfield Avenue.
The project site contains Prime Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance as designated by the Department of Conservation’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program.1 The site also contains lands under Williamson Act contract. 1 California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/
Department Comments
Although conversion of agricultural land is often an unavoidable impact under CEQA analysis, feasible alternatives and/or feasible mitigation measures must be considered.
In some cases, the argument is made that mitigation cannot reduce impacts to below the level of significance because agricultural land will still be converted by the project, and therefore, mitigation is not required. However, reduction to a level below significance is not a criterion for mitigation under CEQA. Rather, the criterion is feasible mitigation that lessens a project's impacts. As stated in CEQA statue, mitigation may also include, “Compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments, including through permanent protection of such resources in the form of conservation easements.”2
The conversion of agricultural land represents a permanent reduction in the State's agricultural land resources. As such, the Department advises the use of permanent agricultural conservation easements on land of at least equal quality and size as partial compensation for the loss of agricultural land. Conservation easements are an available mitigation tool and considered a standard practice in many areas of the State. The Department highlights conservation easements because of their acceptance and use by lead agencies as an appropriate mitigation measure under CEQA and because it follows an established rationale similar to that of wildlife habitat mitigation.
Mitigation via agricultural conservation easements can be implemented by at least two alternative approaches: the outright purchase of easements or the donation of mitigation fees to a local, regional, or statewide organization or agency whose purpose includes the acquisition and stewardship of agricultural conservation easements. The conversion of agricultural land should be deemed an impact of at least regional significance. Hence, the search for replacement lands should not be limited strictly to lands within the project's surrounding area.
A source that has proven helpful for regional and statewide agricultural mitigation banks is the California Council of Land Trusts. They provide helpful insight into farmland mitigation policies and implementation strategies, including a guidebook with model policies and a model local ordinance. The guidebook can be found at:
http://www.calandtrusts.org/resources/conserving-californias-harvest/ Of course, the use of conservation easements is only one form of mitigation that should be considered. Any other feasible mitigation measures should also be considered. 2 Public Resources Code Section 15370, Association of Environmental Professionals, 2020 CEQA, California Environmental Quality Act, Statute & Guidelines, page 284, https://www.califaep.org/docs/2020_ceqa_book.pdf
Conclusion
The Department recommends further discussion of the following issues:
• Type, amount, and location of farmland conversion resulting directly and indirectly from implementation of the proposed project. • Impacts on any current and future agricultural operations in the vicinity; e.g., land-use conflicts, increases in land values and taxes, loss of agricultural support infrastructure such as processing facilities, etc.
• Incremental impacts leading to cumulative impacts on agricultural land. This would include impacts from the proposed project, as well as impacts from past, current, and likely future projects.
• Proposed mitigation measures for all impacted agricultural lands within the proposed project area.
• Projects compatibility with lands within an agricultural preserve and/or enrolled in a Williamson Act contract.
• If applicable, notification of Williamson Act contract non-renewal and/or cancellation.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Lombardi Development Project.
Please provide this Department with notices of any future hearing dates as well as any staff reports pertaining to this project. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact Farl Grundy, Associate Environmental Planner via email at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Monique Wilber
Conservation Program Support Supervisor
Printed on Recycled Paper
July 26, 2021
Mr. Jason Ridenour
City of Porterville
291 N. Main Street
Porterville, CA 93257
[email protected]
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR LOMBARDI DEVELOPMENT PROJECT – DATED JULY 2021
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: 2021070158)
Dear Mr. Ridenour:
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) received a Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Lombardi Development Project (Project).
The Lead Agency is receiving this notice from DTSC because the Project includes one or more of the following: groundbreaking activities, work in close proximity to a roadway, work in close proximity to mining or suspected mining or former mining activities, presence of site buildings that may require demolition or modifications, importation of backfill soil, and/or work on or in close proximity to an agricultural or former agricultural site.
DTSC recommends that the following issues be evaluated in the EIR Hazards and Hazardous Materials section:
1. The EIR should acknowledge the potential for historic or future activities on or near the project site to result in the release of hazardous wastes/substances on the project site. In instances in which releases have occurred or may occur, further studies should be carried out to delineate the nature and extent of the contamination, and the potential threat to public health and/or the environment should be evaluated. The EIR should also identify the mechanism(s) to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation and the government agency who will be responsible for providing appropriate regulatory oversight.
Mr. Jason Ridenour
July 26, 2021